^ LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIPORNIA . SAN Diceo ILI EDITED BY G. W. PROTHERO, LiTT.D. HONORARY FELLOW OF KING'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, AND PROFESSOR OF HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH. SPAIN: ITS GREATNESS AND DECAY (1479— 1788) lonton: C. J. CLAY and SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. 263, ARGYLE STREET. ILcipjifj: F. A. BROCKHAUS. #.eb3 lovli: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Bombajj: E. SEYMOUR HALE. SPAIN ITS GREATNESS AND DECAY {1479-1788) BY MARTIN A. S/HUME EDITOR OF THE CALENDARS OF SPANISH STATE PAPERS, AUTHOR OF "THE YEAR AFTER THE ARMADA," "PHILIP H," &C. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY EDWARD ARMSTRONG ■ FELLOW OF queen's COLLEGE, OXFORD, AUTHOR OF "ELIZABETH FARNESE," &C. SECOND EDITION, REVISED AND CORRECTED. CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1899 \^AU Rights referred'] GENERAL PREFACE. The awi of this series is to sketch the history of Modern Europe, with that of its chief colonies and conquests, from about the end of the fifteenth century down to the present time. In one or tivo cases the story will commence at an earlier date : in the case of the colonies it will usually begin later. The histories of the differ e7it countries will be described, as a general rule, separately, for it is believed that, except in epochs like that of the French Revolution and Napoleon I, the connection of events will thus be better understood and the continuity of historical develop- metit more clearly displayed. The series is intended for the use of all persons anxious to miderstatid the nature of existing political cotiditions. '■'■The roots of the present lie deep in the past," and the real significance of contemporary events caniiot be grasped unless the historical cajises zvhich have led to them are knoivn. The plan adopted makes it possible to treat the history of the last four centuries in considerable detail, and to embody the most importa}it results of modern research. It is hoped therefore that the series will be useful not only to beginners but to students who have already acquired some general knowledge of European History. For those who wish to carry their studies further, the bibliography appended to each volume will act as a guide to original sources of itformatio7i and works more detailed and authoritative. Considerable attention 7vill be paid to political geography, and each volume will be furnished with such maps and plans as may be requisite for the illustration of the text. G. W. PROTHERO. first Edition iSyS. Second Edition 1899. PREFACE. THE mere relation of the events of history adds but little to the stock of useful knowledge, unless it enables us to apply the experience of the past to the conduct of the present, and so to avoid for our own time some of the errors into which previous generations have fallen. This end can best be attained by regarding history not as a disjointed collection of facts, but as a harmonious concatenation of causes and effects. In the case of most national histories this is difficult, because the actions and the results which follow them are usually distant in point of time, obscured by side issues and complicated by intervening circumstances. It is otherwise with the history of Spain. There the ordinary observer may see the working of the process by which nations are ruined. He who runs may read the lessons that un- supported pride and unwarranted ambition are as disastrous to nations as to men, that riches gained without labour pro- duce no extended or lasting prosperity, that the true basis of wealth is industrial production, that beneficent ends cannot be attained by means which disregard human sufterings or trample on human rights, and, above all, that the hereditary transmission of unrestrained power from father to son is certain to end in disaster, because sooner or later the power vi Preface. must descend to an individual too weak or too vicious to exercise it worthily. The period dealt with in these pages covers ihe rise and decadence of Spain and the commencement of a fallacious resuscitation. The rise was unwarranted by the stage of development which the nation had reached, and the ruin was consequently complete. In the history of no other European country is the whole cycle of national potency and exhaustion presented in so small a space, or in so simple a form. The tale is one of almost unexampled and unrelieved misfortune, and yet each succeeding catastrophe, each re- curring disgrace, each repeated sacrifice, can be traced almost with certainty to the unwise act or short-sighted policy from which it sprang. To the modern student of political economy the financial and administrative systems successively adopted by Spanish ministers will appear grotesquely perverse and calculated to destroy the sources of wealth. Statesmen will note that the first and greatest disaster of Spain was the inheritance by her King of extended territories in Central Europe, which made her the great continental power with a prospect of universal dominion; and that trade, in her case, did not "follow the flag," notwithstanding the strenuous efforts to maintain a monopoly, because the home manufactures were crushed with intolerable burdens, while the workers were demoralised by constant wars, and by the false belief that coin was wealth, instead of a token of value. It will be observed that despotic personal government, with its consequent suffering and dis- aster, only became possible when the weakness of the people's representatives allowed the national purse-strings to be wrested from their grasp by force or bribery ; and that the oppression Preface. \'\\ of the people and the sacrifice of their welfare followed as a natural result from the emasculation of the national parlia- ments. These are a few of the lessons which may be learnt from the history of Spain more easily than from that of any other nation ; and for this reason, amongst others, it is to be deplored that so little attention has hitherto been devoted to its study by English readers. In order to render the application the more direct, the history of Spain related in the following pages has been separated, so far as appeared possible, from the tangled skein of European foreign politics, and the vicissitudes of the Spanish nation itself have been traced with as much detail as the limited space permitted. An attempt has been made to present the story with absolute impartiality, and to render it a trustworthy and readable relation of events. MARTIN A, S. HUME. London, September 1898. EDITORIAL NOTE. The result of the .Spanish-American conflict renders it necessary to say that the Introduction, containing a reference (p. 5) to Cuba and other islands as still forming part of the Spanish colonial Empire, was printed off before the recent war broke out. G. W. P. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. PAGE § I. The Rule of Ferdinand and Isabella ... i § 11. Philip I and the Regency of Ferdinand, 1504^ 1516. Charles I (V), 1516—1529 .... 31 § III. Spain and Europe, 1529 — 1556 64 CHAPTER I. Philip II, 1527— 1551 loi CHAPTER II. Philip II, 1551 — 1560 114 CHAPTER III. Philip II, 1560— 1568 133 CHAPTER IV. Philip H, 1568 — 1581 152 CHAPTER V. Philip II, 1580— 1598 171 CHAPTER VI. Philip III, 1598— 162 1 197 X Contents. CHAPTER VII. PAGE Philip IV, 162 1— 1640 224 CHAPTER VIII. Philip IV, 1638— 1643 244 CHAPTER IX. Philip IV, 1643 — 1665 266 CHAPTER X. Charles II, 1665— 1678 284 CHAPTER XI. Charles II, 1675 — 1700 295 CHAPTER XII. Philip V, 1700 — 1714 318 CHAPTER XIII. Philip V, 1714— 1731 346 CHAPTER XIV. Philip V — Ferdinand VF, 1732 — 1759 ..... 370 CHAPTER XV. Charles III, 1759— 1788 . 392 Bibliography of Spanish History, 1479 — 178S . . . 412 Index 423 Maps (at end), r. Spain, 1527 — 1788. 2. The European possessions of the Spanish Monarchy. INTRODUCTION. SECTION I. THE RULE OF FERDINAND AND ISABELLA. The conquest of the weak and divided kingdom of Granada was, perhaps, no heroic feat : but, none the less, it was a momentous crisis in the history of Spain. Europe itself was startled by it ; the loss of Constantinople seemed to find its compensation in the fall of Granada; the left wing of Islam had been beaten back upon its African reserves. For Spain the consequences were far-reaching. The task of centuries was complete ; she must now seek another. A people which for generations had lived to fight, whose whole social and political organisation had developed out of war, could not lie down to sleep. The union of Castile and Aragon and the acquisition of Granada formed a power of first-rate importance ; it was certain to exercise its young strength in fresh expansion. It is true that to modern notions the union of Castile and Aragon was incomplete ; the marriage of their sovereigns was their only tie. The two kingdoms stood back to back, with different characters and different interests ; common service against the Moors had not obliterated mutual dislike. Yet the unity of the king and queen was so entire, and the personality of each so strong, that for purposes of external policy Castile and Aragon were already Si)ain. Portugal JI. s. I 2 Spain. still preserved her independence, but it had for long seemed likely that Castile would unite with Portugal rather than with Aragon. The little kingdom of Navarre also formed a breach in Iberian unity. It lay like a pair of saddle-bags across the western Pyrenees, tempting both France and Spain to bestride the ridge. A French house was, indeed, already in the saddle. Queen Blanche, Ferdinand's half-sister, had bequeathed Navarre to her divorced husband Henry IV of Castile, but he failed to hold it against her sister and successor Eleanor, who had married into the house of Foix. Eleanor's heir again had married Madeleine, sister of Louis XI, who acted as regent successively for her two children, Francis Phebus and Catherine. Isabella, with a view to the ultimate absorption of Navarre, had schemed to marry each of these children into her own family, but Madeleine had foiled her plans. At the date of the Con- quest of Granada Navarre was ruled by Catherine and her husband, Jean, of the French house of Albret. It seemed unlikely, moreover, that the kingdom, differing in customs, language and ethnology, should gravitate towards Spain. On the eastern flank of the Pyrenees lay another saddle- state. To the south was Catalonia, to the north its depen- dent counties, Roussillon and Cerdagne. These latter in the troubled times of John II had been mortgaged to Louis XI; after much sharp dealing and hard fighting they had remained to France. But as Spanish Navarre was Basque, so was Roussillon Catalan, alien to France, full of Catalan if not of Spanish feeling. It had revolted from Louis XI because he had suppressed the inalienable right of private war. Roussillon and Cerdagne, even after their final union to France under Louis XIV, remained Catalan in customs until the days of Arthur Young, who describes them as a Spanish country tempered by the blessings of French administration. Spain's difficulty has always been that she has so many sides, so many possibilities, so many alternative policies. Ferdinand and Isabella. 3 There were causes enough in Navarre and Roussillon for dispute with France. Yet the northern frontier may almost be left out of consideration. At either end of the Pyrenees the country is difficult, incapable in early days of supporting considerable armies. The two nations might skirmish on this side or on that, but they could not close, they could not strike vital blows. If rivals they were to be, the fight must be fought elsewhere. There remained then three sides to Spain. The Portu- guese discoveries pointed to the Atlantic. Where Lisbon led, Cadiz and Seville, Ferrol and Corunna must some day follow. The voyage of Columbus was so nearly coincident with the conquest of Granada that they may be considered in connec- tion. The discovery of America, even though its full bearings were not realised, from the first struck the imagination, turning men's minds westwards, tempting the pent-up energy of a people, whose blood was boiling, to adventure rather than to war, to the sea rather than to the land. Had Castile at this time been united with Portugal instead of Aragon, the world's history might or must have been very different. There was yet another alternative. Long before the con- quest of Granada Spanish and African adventurers had raided each other's shores. Spain until the present century, has had to feel only too acutely that she has a southern seaboard. Her own Moors had not been exterminated; many had sought shelter with their African brethren and so added to their strength. Here chronic hostility was intensified by recurrent outbursts of fanaticism. Was it not then the obvious policy of Spain to follow up her conquest of Granada, to break the forces of Islam which were forming anew upon the opposite coast? With a huge Moorish population, imperfectly Chris- tianised in the old kingdoms, and professedly Mussulman in Granada, could Spain risk the chances of a reaction, and that with the power of the Osmanli advancing by leaps and bounds in the eastern Mediterranean? Nor was this all. Sicily is by 4 Spain. situation and tradition almost as much African as European. Her southernmost shores He below the northernmost point of Africa. Thrusting herself athwart the Mediterranean, she must be either a basis of operations against the Turk and Moor, or the objective of their common attacks. No power that holds Sicily can afford to neglect Tunis. Further east again the kings of Aragon had long-dormant claims on Athens, and even on Salonica, claims that as a crusading power they might one day make good against the Turkish conquerors of Greece, or as a South Italian power against the commercial monopoly of Venice. If the glance of Castile wavered, that of Aragon looked steadily eastward. The conquest of the Balearic isles had been but a stepping-stone to Sardinia. Early in the 15th century Alfonso had all but conquered Corsica, and had reduced Genoa to the last extremities. Pressure on the north of Italy had only been relieved by diversion to the south, where the warlike king on a dubious title won and held the kingdom of Naples. Although he left this to his bastard, and not to his brother John II of Aragon, the legitimate heir, yet there was now in southern Italy an Aragonese dynasty strengthened by the importation of Aragonese nobles and ecclesiastics. Moreover across the straits lay Sicily, Aragonese for more than two centuries. If therefore Isabella allowed her husband to direct her European policy it was certain that Spain would exercise her united strength upon the neighbouring peninsula. As if these problems were not enough, within a few years of the conquest of Granada the Catholic kings must add another. The marriages of two princesses to the heirs of England and the Netherlands were destined to force Spain to play the leading part in the religious conflict of the future; she must pick up the glove as champion not only of Cross against Crescent, but of the Faith against the heretic. The history of Spain is therefore the tragic result of an embarrassing wealth of alternative policies. It was impossible Ferdinand and Isabella. 5 that a country with no common feeling or constitutional unity between its principal sections, containing an alien race funda- mentally opposed in faith and customs, herself sparsely popu- lated, her material resources undeveloped, should permanently succeed in all the tasks imposed upon her by nature or ambi- tion. That she sank after a century and a half of greatness need excite no wonder. Marvellous rather was the tenacity which held its grip so long. Into the i8th century Spain retained her hold of a moiety of the Netherlands ; only lately Spanish princes have lost the two Sicilies and Parma. Cuba and the Philippines still represent her Colonial Empire in the Western and Eastern Indies, while in the independent States of Southern and Central America handfuls of Spaniards still plunder at pleasure the masses of industrious emigrants from other European states. In Africa the Spanish flag still flies in somewhat fitful triumph over her first conquest, Melilla. Christendom, all deductions made, has reason to be grateful to the conquerors of Lepanto, to the missionaries of the Indies. Catholicism must place to Alba's credit the long-untainted orthodoxy of the Belgian provinces. It was not when Spain was at her height, but when her decline was already obvious, that a French writer in Richelieu's service stated that Spain surpassed all nations in the art of government. If by this phrase be meant, not the gift of administration, but the power to rule, it may pass muster. It is difficult to apportion between Ferdinand and Isabella the glories of their reign. Spanish writers, being at once courteous and Castilian, exalt their queen at the expense of her Aragonese partner. Italian contemporaries speak only of Ferdinand. This is natural, for European policy was his especial field ; whatever troubles occurred at home upon Isabella's death, his success abroad scarcely received a check. As here the husband led the wife, so did the little kingdom of Aragon lead the larger sister nation. From Ferdinand's reign dates the long conflict between the French and Spanish 6 Spain. peoples. But this quarrel was not Castilian. The thoughts of Castile had been turned south and west, to Granada and Portugal; her relations with France had almost invariably been friendly. But Aragon had been opposed to France in Rous- sillon and in Navarre; it had contested with the French crown the possession of Genoa, with the French house of Anjou that of Sicily and Naples. After the fall of Granada the Catholic kings were prepared to devote themselves to internal organisation. Any superfluous energy might well have been employed on African conquest oi American discovery. At this moment their hands were forced by the ambition of their more powerful neighbour. The Granada of France was Brittany; the marriage of the young duchess with Charles VIII was the equivalent of the "last sigh" of the fallen Boabdil. Ferdinand had employed both arms and diplomacy to preserve the independence of Brittany, but in vain. The marriage took place in 149 1, and the French king had thus a start of just a year. The long-deferred inter- vention in Italy was now possible. Charles VIII would enforce the claims, which the house of Anjou had bequeathed to the Crown, against the Aragonese occupants of Naples. Meanwhile Granada fell, and Charles realised that he must buy the abstention of the legitimate hne of Aragon. By the treaty of Barcelona, Roussillon and Cerdagne were ceded on the Catholic kings' engagement that they would give no aid to the enemies of France, saving the Pope, that they would suffer no intermarriage with the houses of Hapsburg, England or Naples. Thus Aragon recovered her lost provinces, and Spain once more had a foothold on soil geographically French. To Ferdinand, half a treaty, his own half, was always better than the whole. Before Charles VIII left France, and again when he marched out of Rome towards Naples, protests were presented by Ferdinand's envoys. No sooner was Naples taken than Ferdinand elaborated the league of Venice which cost the French king his conquests. Coincident with this Ferdinaftd and Isabella. 7 was the double marriage of his children with the house of Hapsburg, and the marriage of his sister to the restored Aragonese king of Naples. Even before Charles VIII died, Ferdinand opened negotiations for a partition of the Nea- politan kingdom (1497). Early in the reign of Louis XII this actually took effect (1500). The spoilers soon quarrelled, for thieves are singularly sensitive as to their own proprietary rights. Gonsalvo's military skill and Ferdinand's diplomatic lack of scruple decided the contest in favour of Spain. Within eleven years Spain had won Granada, Roussillon and Naples. Upon Isabella's death Ferdinand's administration in Castile was threatened by his son-in-law Philip, who was supported by his father the Emperor Maximilian. For protection Ferdinand turned to France ; he married Germaine de Foix, the French king's niece ; upon the child, who was only born to die, were settled the rights of the two crowns in Naples. This new friendship led naturally to the partition treaty of Cambray. In this Louis XII seemed to have the lion's share ; to his Duchy of Milan were assigned the wealthy cities of Venetian Lombardy from the Adda to the Mincio ; while to Ferdinand fell only the towns on the Apulian coast which Venice held in compensation of her expenses in the war of 1495 — 6. No sooner had Ferdinand obtained the cession of these towns than he formed a fresh combination against France. He won to his side the very Pope, the prime mover of the League of Cambray, and Venice the professed enemy. The result was the expulsion of the French from Lombardy. Meanwhile Ferdinand had utilised the difficulties of Louis XII to occupy the Spanish territories of his ally the king of Navarre. Thus he had closed the second gate through the Pyrenees. Navarre retained its separate Cortes, its legal customs, its financial independence. But, notwithstanding that its earlier relations had been with Aragon, Ferdinand cleverly incorporated it with the crown of Castile, thus pledging the more powerful kingdom to the maintenance of his conquest. 8 Spain. In Italy it was already clear that the Spaniards would not be content with Naples ; they soon felt their way up both coasts of the peninsula. In 1505 Gonsalvo de Cordova assumed the protectorate of Pisa during her revolt against Florence; in 15 12 at Ravenna the Spaniards barred the French advance southwards through Romagna. Two years later a Spanish army fired on Venice from the shores of her lagoon, and in retreating scattered the powerful Venetian forces near Vicenza. If the Swiss had the main share in expeUing the French from Lombardy, and if the new native Duke, Maxi- milian Sforza, sat uneasily on Swiss pikes, yet a Spanish force lurked round Verona. When Francis I at Marignano (15 15) beat these selfsame Swiss, this Spanish corps was watching the passage of the Po at Piacenza. The Swiss defeat was to none more profitable than to their Spanish ally. Henceforth Lombardy must be the battlefield between France and Spain. Ferdinand relied less on arms than on diplomacy. Truly marvellous was his power of combination. He had already united Maximilian of Austria and Henry VII of England in defence of Breton autonomy, enabling Henry to enter the coalition by filching from France her traditional ally Scotland, for the marriage of James IV and Margaret Tudor set England temporarily free. Whenever the restless French king moved he found himself checked by Ferdinand's combinations. After the conquest of Naples Charles VIII was confronted by Ferdinand, Maximilian, the Pope, Venice and Milan (1495). The success of Louis XII in Venetian Lombardy was nullified by the coalition of Spain, England, the Swiss, the Papacy and Venice (1511). If France detached Venice from this Holy League, Ferdinand drew over Maximilian to his side. Making a peace with France in 15 13, he threw Henry VIII and Maximilian against her at Guinegate, and hurled the Swiss on Dijon. The last act of his life was a coalition which should check Francis I in the full tide of victory after Marignano (1515). Ferdinand and Isabella. 9 In these combinations marriage was naturally the chief resource. The matches made by Ferdinand's children would be alone sufficient to prove the prominence of Spain in European poUtics. Great importance was, indeed, still given to Pan-Iberian projects. The eldest Infanta, Isabella, was married to John II of Portugal (1490), and on his death to his brother Emanuel (1495). When the Spanish Infante, Juan, died (1497) it seemed likely that Isabella's son, Miguel, would unite the crowns of Spain and Portugal. But in these Portuguese marriages passing-bells followed fast on wedding peals. Miguel scarcely survived the birth which proved his mother's death (1497), and for two more generations the union with Portugal was deferred. Other marriages were purely diplomatic ; they were in- tended to consolidate the anti-French coalitions. Thus the negotiations for the alliance of Prince Arthur and Catherine date from the days when Spain and England had common concern in the defence of Brittany (i486). Catherine was sent to England when Louis XII had increased his power by the occupation of Milan. Her marriage with her deceased husband's brother is contemporaneous with the conflict of France and Spain for Naples. So too the League of Venice against France had caused the double marriage of Maximilian's heir Philip with Ferdinand's second daughter, Juana, and of the Infante Juan with Philip's sister, Margaret. In these complicated matrimonial schemes Ferdinand overreached him- self He was no Maximilian, he had no dreams of universal dominion for his family, his range of vision was limited by the practical and the possible. Yet the successive deaths of Juan, Isabella and Miguel left Juana the heiress to the crowns of Spain ; her child must inherit the possessions of Hapsburgs and Burgundians, and a claim, already (luasi-hcrcditary, to the Empire. Ferdinand was not only the most successful statesman of his age ; he may claim to be founder of a school. This school lo Spain. is often regarded as Italian, but it is pre-eminently Spanish, and more particularly Aragonese. If Machiavelli wishes for a type of unscrupulous statesmanship he turns to Spain. His hero is Caesar Borgia, a Valencian; his ideal of successful villainy is Ferdinand of Aragon. " There is a certain prince of the present time," he writes, "who never preaches aught but peace and good faith, and yet of both he is the greatest foe." Guicciardini again and again returns to the same theme, " I am convinced that above all other men he is a master of pretence." The tale is told of Ferdinand himself that when Louis XII complained that he had twice been deceived, the Aragonese exclaimed, "The drunkard ! he lies. I have cheated him more than ten times." This precise quality Guicciardini in his first embassy attributed to the whole Spanish nation, "In profession and in externals they are most religious, but not in practice ; they are men of infinite ceremonies, which they perform with much reverence of manner, with great humility of phrase, with honourable titles and kissings of hand ; everyone is their lord ; they are at everyone's command j but they are men to keep at arm's length, and to trust but little." In Ferdinand's school were trained the least scrupulous diplomatists of Charles' reign, such as Juan Manuel and Hugo de Moncada; Ferdinand hated the former because he was too like himself. Every student of the age of Philip II can lay his hand upon the later exponents of the great master's principles. The home of Machiavellism was not Italy but Spain. For Ferdinand Africa was but a "jumping off" spot for Italy ; for his minister Jimenez it was the chief object of external policy. At his own expense the Cardinal undertook the conquest of North Africa. Under his auspices Algiers was blockaded by the possession of Pehon ; Oran, Bugia, even distant Tripoli, were won for Spain. Had he received his master's hearty support he might have realised Isabella's dream and conquered the great Moorish kingdom of Tlemcen. Ferdinand and Isabella. 1 1 The Spaniards miglit have gained a firm hold upon North Africa before the Turks aj)peared in the Western Mediterranean, As it was, Spanish garrisons, scantily suppHed with food and even water from Spain or Sicily, clung desperately to their ports and the few yards of territory beyond the walls. A force is lost that always acts on the defensive. Not only Italy but America was diverting the attention of Crown and people from Africa. Before the death of Ferdinand permanent occupation did not extend beyond the islands, but explorers had ranged from Florida to the River Plate, and had claimed for Spain the shores of the Pacific. Already the Cadres of religious and governmental administration were established ; already the Crown was in public interest infringing the charters of those who had borne the brunt of discovery and conquest. There is little doubt that the extension of the dominions of the Crown under Ferdinand and Isabella added greatly to their intrinsic power within their territories. It placed them on a pedestal high above the strongest nobleman, or the wealthiest ecclesiastic ; it gave distance and atmosphere to royalty. Yet this very extension would have been impossible or dangerous had not king and queen resolutely increased also the intension of their power. On the accession of Isabella the fortunes of the Castilian Crown were at their lowest. Royal revenues had been almost completely alienated, royal justice was corrupted or defied, there was no regular military force on which the Crown could count. The Crown had lost its character and prestige ; of the two classes on which it might naturally rely, the clergy was secularised or demoralised, the towns divided or wasted by the factions of the nobles. Isabella's very succession was disputed by her niece, whose only disqualifica- tion was the doubtful legitimacy of her birth. The lack of proof gave a pretext to the rebellion of the nobles ; the claimant was supported by the Crown of Portugal and favoured by that of France. Yet Isabella had some advantages. The alienations of 12 Spain. revenue had been in great part recent ', they were alike irre- gular and unpopular. There was in Castile a very high theory of royal justice; the power of the nobles in this respect was rather of usurpation than of right. The nobles had used their power for personal rather than for class interests ; they were deeply divided; they did not constitute an oligarchy, but perpetuated anarchy. Anarchy, like despotism, when it becomes intolerable, produces its own cure. The Spaniards, with all their moral lapses, had genuine religious instincts; the purification of the Church would find public favour. The towns, if once the Crown could touch them, were both rich and militant. Isabella and her husband grasped the situation. The interest of the monarchy and of the towns was order. Together by drastic measures they broke the power of the nobles. Isabella herself stamped out, for the moment, private war. She destroyed the unlicensed castles in Galicia, she summarily stopped the noble feuds which had devastated Andalusia. The organisation of the Hermandad acted in the same direction. Originally this had been a private association of towns, resembling the town leagues of Germany, and, like these, caused by the weakness of the executive. It had been directed against the brigands who infested the high-roads, against the noble enemies of the towns, sometimes against the Crown itself It was now organised as a governmental institution. With great wisdom its popular and representative character was preserved ; it had no connection with the regular judicial system ; it was a measure of police, supple- menting the criminal jurisdiction in country districts. The Hermandad dealt exclusively with crimes of violence committed in the country, or where the criminal took refuge in the country. The Supreme Junta consisted of delegates from each province. They, and not the Crown, appointed provincial officials to try cases of first instance and to collect contribu- tions. Each village had one or more elected magistrates; every Ferdmand and Isabella. 1 3 hundred hearths provided a horse archer. Thus the Crown was brought into contact with every village in the country. This system was marvellously efficient. A criminal was hunted from parish to parish, fresh relays of archers taking up the hue and cry. The police had the fullest rights of search ; they could ransack suspected castles and force the gates of towns. The criminal, once caught, was haled to the scene of his crime, and within three days punished. Lesser offenders escaped with mutilation, the greater were set against a wall or tree and shot to death. As times mended the Hermandad was found both oppressive and expensive. The Junta and superior offices were abolished in 1498 ; it survived only as an efficient police force, the members still electing the petty magistrates and police sergeants. Its methods had been too severe to be completely popular. There were petitions that the Hermandad should adopt the merciful methods of the Inquisition, and strangle its victims before it shot them. It is noticeable that the Hermandad, as the Inquisition, was extended from Castile to Aragon and there survived until the Cortes of 15 10. Not content with breaking the power of the nobles in the provinces the Crown diminished it in the Royal Council. The legal element, always present, was increased. This class was drawn from the lesser nobility and upper bourgeoisie. The gentry, driven off the roads, took service with the Crown or with the towns. This was the origin of Spanish bureaucracy, which, ultimately oppressive and deadening, was at first bene- ficial as encouraging a sense of order, and order was what Spain chiefly needed. At this time also the great Crown offices, monopolised by the nobility, lost much of their importance. The Grand Chancellorship was attached to the See of Toledo, the Grand Constable and Grand Admiral retained their dignity at the expense of their importance. The provincial governor- ships had often become hereditary, and this system, if unchecked, would crystallise into a new feudal formation. The Crown modified or abolished the system of heredity, or skilfully 14 Spain. instituted new officials, who, nominally collateral or inferior, drew away the practical power from the titular magnates. It was of consummate importance that the grandmaster- ships of the three military orders, Santiago, Alcantara and Calatrava, were, as they became vacant, conferred upon Fer- dinand. The Crown revenues were thus very largely increased. The kings in each order gained the command of a small disciplined force, of a large number of vassals, of considerable territory and numerous fortresses, especially on the Castilian- Moorish frontier. The gentry were now attracted to Court service by the commanderies, the pensions, the benefices, the crosses of the Orders. The kings could reward their supporters without trenching on their own revenues. Above all the possession of the grandmasterships by the king kept them from the hands of the great nobles, who could easily make them dangerous. The king became the sole and only leader of the old chivalry of Spain, as of its modern military system'. This centripetal process was aided by the Moorish wars. The Crown gave employment to the nobles by enlisting their interest in the conquest of Granada, and to a less extent in that of Naples and Navarre. It was now the military centre of the nobility. The influence of the early Renaissance in Spain had similar effects. The Crown early became the intellectual centre ; the new learning became a fashion, bringing the nobility nearer to the Crown, and adding lustre to the Court. Nobles flocked to the Universi- ties, they even looked to University appointments as a career instead of arms. The elaborate ceremonial of the later Spanish Court is ascribed to the Burgundian influence. But the tendency had already begun under the Catholic kings. Isabella loved to see herself surrounded by a numerous suite ; vvhile boasting ^ The Grandmasterships were permanently annexed to the Crown by Pope Hadrian VI. Ferdinand and Isabella. 15 of her simplicity, she was notorious for the magnificence of her costumes. While the king increased in grandeur, the nobles were forbidden their usurped privilege of using the royal style, of quartering the royal arms; their long trains of mules and horses were strictly limited. In some of the above measures the nobles themselves voluntarily concurred ; in the outburst of national enthusiasm they too were influenced by public opinion, and realised the necessity of strengthening the Crown. Thus, at the Cortes of Toledo in 1480, they consented to the resumption of royal estates, and some of the great nobles set the example in promoting the Hermandad. The clergy in Spain were very influential and very rich, always zealously extending their property and jurisdiction. Ferdinand and Isabella did little to check the former, because a large proportion of the wealth found its way to the royal coffers. They strove, however, to control ecclesiastical juris- diction, though not with complete success, and the struggle between the royal officials and the clergy long outlived them. Peculiar privileges had from time to time been conferred by the Papacy on the Crown in the nomination to bishoprics in territories conquered from the Moors. These privileges Ferdinand and Isabella revived and extended, insisting on the sole right of nomination, protesting against the confer- ring of sees on foreigners, and the consequent non-residence. The conflict reached its climax under Sixtus IV in the case of the bishoprics of Cordoba and Cuenca; it ended in the victory of the Crown. This has often been called the Spanish Concordat, but the Papacy did not so formally recognise defeat. The Crown had already, by Papal aid, imposed financial burdens on the clergy, such as the "royal thirds," or strictly speaking two-ninths of the tithe, which became a permanent source of revenue. Fourths or tenths were granted by the Pope for special emergencies, and a large proportion of the tithes of Granada was vested in the Crown. This was a 1 6 Spain. recognition of the crusading character of the Spanish kings, a principle which was hereafter to receive unhmited extension. Tlie rigorous reformation of the clergy was effected by Ferdinand and Isabella in complete independence of the Papacy, and at a time of great corruption in the Papal See. The Crown posed as a religious power, as the head of the Spanish Church, and this explains the attitude of Charles V and Philip II to the Church and the Catholic revival. The reform was not only one of discipline and morals, its object was also to purify doctrine, to stimulate theological learning, to produce a highly educated clergy, promoted not by birth but merit. Indirectly this increased the royal authority. The great sees were no longer the appanages of the magnates, while the Crown had more control over prelates of lesser social rank whose promotion depended upon itself. By its reforms the government also placed a check on the independ- ence of the Religious Orders ; on the other hand the Inquisition, which was in the hands of the friars, lowered the authority of the bishops ; the numerous attacks made by the Inquisition upon bishops form one of its most pecuhar features. The Spanish Inquisition was introduced to meet peculiar circumstances not existing in other countries. It bears some analogy to the Hermandad. As the latter was independent of the normal system of justice, so the Inquisition lay outside the regular ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The Hermandad crushed the social anarchy in the country districts, which was due to special and temporary causes. The Inquisition in the great towns re-established doctrinal order which was threatened by the mixed character of the population. There had hitherto been no efficient Inquisition, and yet religion and nationality were alike in peril. Purity of blood and doctrine was being tainted, especially in the upper classes, by intermarriage with Jews. The contagion was spreading throughout society; Judaism was the peculiar heresy of Spain. To meet this the Spanish Inquisition was established. Its powers centred Ferdmand and Isabella. ly in the Dominican order, reinforced by a secular element of lawyers. Its original victims were not Jews, but nominal Christians falling from their faith. The institution must needs be strong, because the Jews and Judaisers were power- ful, monopolising the medical, banking and tax-farming l)rofessions, and backed by a prosperous industrial population. The Judaisers were numerous in the municipal bodies, and were protected by nobles, many of whom were descended from Jewesses. So also some of the upper clergy were of Jewish descent, notably Talavera, Isabella's confessor and arch- bishop of Granada. Seville was the centre of the heresy, and here, therefore, was the original centre of the Inquisition. Heresy, it was found, could not be checked as long as the Jews themselves went scatheless, and the revival of old re- strictive laws did little to diminish their influence. Hence in 1492 the sphere of the Inquisition was extended to Jews, who were subjected to forced conversion or to exile. The movement and its motives may be compared to the recent measures of the Russian government, whose object also was to purge not only orthodoxy but nationality of an alien element. The conquest of Granada widely extended the functions of the Inquisition. The Crown guaranteed religious liberty, and at first propagandism was solely persuasive. This method was too slow for Jime'nez, who by vexatious regulations drove the people to revolt. The guarantees were then withdrawn, and forced conversion applied (1500). The Crown had a direct interest in its rapidity, for upon this depended the pecuniary favours of the Pope. Thus for more than one reason it was a joyful moment when Jime'nez declared that not an unconverted Moor remained in the kingdom of Granada. The Inquisition was not exclusively a royal constitution, for the Pope confirmed the Inquisitor General whom the Crown nominated, and claimed powers of regulation ; more than once Popes interfered to mitigate the Inquisitor's severity. Yet being a purely Spanish institution it was practically worked H. s. , 1 8 Spain. by the Crown. It gave the king a complete hold over Jews and Moriscos, its financial profits were considerable, it was held in terroreni over the nobles whose Christian blood was seldom pure, it was always threatening to become a secular source of monarchical oppression. The popularity of the Inquisition was not universal. In Cordoba there was open revolt headed by the chief nobleman of the town, supported by the municipality. This was so far successful that the Inquisitor General and his obnoxious agent were removed. In Aragon, Valencia and Catalonia resistance was more general. In Saragossa the Inquisitor was murdered before the altar ; there was scarcely a noble house in Aragon which was not concerned in the conspiracy. The nobles dreaded the Inquisition, the Bishops and the lawyers were jealous of it ; the lower classes usually applauded it, their blood was purer, their fortunes not so tempting,, they regarded it as a scourge wherewith to chastise the nobles. Ferdinand and Isabella relied mainly for support upon the Castilian towns. In their origin these towns had been military colonies in the territories conquered from the Moors. From the first the dominant element was the chivalry rather than the bourgeoisie, and industry was rather agricultural than com- mercial. The town and its lands were divided between the Crown, the religious bodies and various classes of inhabitants, but a large territory remained to the commune. This surplus was far greater than need required, and this explains the capacity of the towns to bear so long the burden of rising taxation. The original charter, for or fuero, regulated the relations of the commune to the Crown, and of the citizens to each other. The towns had been completely self-governing, having their own fortresses, electing their judges {alcaldes)^ police and municipal councils {i-egidores, in some towns named the Twenty-four). To the king belonged only certain royal pleas, and cases of appeal. The Crown lawyers, however, twisted the local for into conformity with an alleged royal Ferdinand and Isabella. 19 for which professed to have higher authority. Royal pleas and cases of appeal, originally exceptional, became numerous. In some towns the Crown appointed a corregidor, at first a concurrent authority with the regidores, who gradually became virtually the town governor. The disorders of the towns ultimately gave the Crown the control of the municipal councils. The office of regidor fell into the hands of the leading families, and every election led to faction fights. The Crown interfered, often substituting nomination for election, and making the offices lifehold. Then it began to sell these offices, and by a natural process they became practically, though not technically, hereditary. The number of regidores was increased for reasons purely pecuniary, and this laid an additional burden upon town finances. The great aim of every ambitious burgher was to gain a place in the governing bodies, which became close and selfish oligarchies. The non-official classes still, however, retained a voice, if not a vote, in the body termed Jurats, who watched the proceedings of the Council in the inhabitants' interest, raising protests against impopular measures. The growth of monarchical influence at the expense of municipal independence was long previous to Ferdinand and Isabella, but they completed and regularised the system, one of their first measures being to place a corregidor in every town where the office did not already exist. This act was very unpopular, yet generally throughout Isabella's reign the Crown and the towns were so fully in harmony that it is difficult to determine their relative power. Notwithstanding the control which the Crown had gained, it continued through- out the 1 6th century to treat the towns with high consideration, making known to them individually every important national event, and receiving almost as foreign ambassadors the com- missioners whom the towns sent to court. Under Ferdinand and Isabella the prosperity of the towns greatly increased, partly from the re-establishment of order. 20 Spain. partly from the fostering commercial policy which gave an impetus to manufacture. But there were elements of discord, firstly between the corregidor and the municipality 3 secondly between the legal and commercial factors, the former having a disproportionate preponderance ; thirdly between the knightly and popular elements, the exempt and the tax-paying. In some towns the gentry almost monopolised the government, in others they were excluded from it. If there had been an absolute line of birth it might have been better, but the constant struggle to rise from one class to the other threw a growing burden of taxation on those who remained poor. Very dangerous was the influence of the great nobles in the cities where they had their palaces. They either unduly influenced the town government, or else provoked hostility, especially if they added to wealth and family influence the official position of corregidor. If there were two such families as at Cadiz, Seville or Zamora, the city was rent by their factions. The Castilian towns were combined in the Cortes. There was no regular summons to nobles and clergy, though these two orders usually attended on great ceremonial occasions, for instance, for the recognition of the heir to the throne. The nobles also were summoned when financial sacrifices were expected, as in 1480 and in 1538. But the Cortes were essentially a taxing body, and while the nobles paid no direct taxation, that of the clergy depended on the Pope. Thus the Cortes were complete without either nobiUty or clergy, whose presence gave no additional validity. The represented towns had formerly been numerous, but in Isabella's reign they were eighteen only, Granada being the last addition. Each town sent two proctors, but the methods of election varied. Sometimes members were drawn by lot from among the town councillors, sometimes one was elected from the regidores, the other from the jwats. Occasionally certain noble families had the right of nomination. In some Ferdinand and Isabella. 21 towns the gentry {/u'dalgos), were elected by turn, in others by the vote of the Council or the body of hidalgos. The majority of the proctors were regidores^ that is, the Cortes consisted mainly of members who had received their town offices from government. Theoretically the members were not delegates but representatives, having full power to act to the best of their judgement. Practically, however, they were bound by secret instructions and oaths. The Cortes had an important voice in the succession to the throne, which in doubtful cases they determined. They received the oath from the new sovereign, they took the oath to the heir, they confirmed a sovereign's testament, and assented to a Council of Regency. Of more frequent importance were their financial functions. They were summoned to vote a subsidy or to negotiate for the commutation of the tax termed Alcabala. The Crown could raise no new form of tax without consent, and this was not always granted. But supply preceded redress and was not conditional thereon. Thus the Cortes had no legislative power proper. They regularly presented a long list of petitions which the Crown either granted or evaded. But the act of legislation was the king's and was by no means confined to the embodiment of these petitions in a statute. Nevertheless the Cortes were and remained a very real check upon the Crown, for future supply did in some measure depend on past redress, and the right of petition was freely and boldly used. The regularity of the summons of Cortes depended less on the constitutional tendencies of a king than on his pecuniary necessities. Thus under Charles V and Philip II, absolute as they were, meetings were frequent. Ferdinand and Isabella disliked parhamentary government, while Jimenez had a horror of the Cortes ; if people were once allowed to talk, he would say, they were certain to become unruly. Thus after the kingdom was restored to order, by measures taken in the Cortes of 1476 and 1480, there was, except perhaps in 1482, 22 Spain. no other session until 1498. That they then became frequent (1499, 1501J 1502) was due partly to the expenses of a more enterprising policy, partly to deaths in the royal family. We already find under Ferdinand and Isabella the multipli- cation of councils or departments which became the peculiarity of Spanish administration. Quite early in the reign the func- tions of the Royal Council were differentiated, although the so-called Councils of State, of Castile, and of Finance might still be regarded as merely sections. Originally the Royal Council of Castile had consisted of great nobles and ecclesias- tics. Then as the towns grew powerful their representatives had been admitted, but these the Crown succeeded in ousting, replacing them by lawyers. The nobles still retained a right of session, with a deliberative but not a decisive voice. The lawyers acting in royal interests drew to themselves all the more important legal business of the country, to such an extent, indeed, that judicial business monopolised the time of the Council. They also set themselves to destroy one by one such legislative prerogatives as the Cortes had once possessed. From this Council we find, under Ferdinand and Isabella, the Council of State or Secret Council definitely separated. This was in fact a Privy Council depending on the king's pleasure, changing its character with each successive monarch. There was no fixed body of rules or procedure ; its members had no fixed place on ceremonial occasions. The king was its president, and apart from him it had no existence. Its functions were consultative, relating especially to foreign affairs, and to the interests of the several kingdoms held by the two Crowns. It was easily converted into a Council of War by the addition of the leading military authorities. Very different was the Council of Castile or Royal Council. This was and remained the most important institution in Spain, having a fixed number of members, fixed rules of procedure, fixed hours of meeting, and very definite functions. The president, usually a learned ecclesiastic, was the first Ferdhiand and Isabella. 23 subject of the kingdom. This Council exercised control over every department of internal life ; on the sovereign's death it assumed the government. Appointed by the Crown it became the chief engine of absolutism. It was strong with all the strength of the Crown, but not strong as against the Crown ; it rarely, if ever, thwarted the power of the Crown, as did occa- sionally the Parliament of Paris, which in many respects it resembled. Ferdinand and Isabella increased the professional element in the Council. It now consisted of nine lawyers, three nobles and one bishop. The monarchy used it to lower the power first of the nobles, and then of the Cortes. The Council had not only judicial but legislative functions ; by a majority of two-thirds it enacted or repealed a law, the result of the deliberation being laid before the king for assent. By the signature of the king, of the president and of four councillors a petition of Cortes could be converted into a law. In the king and the Council of Castile centred the judicial system of the country ; the appointments made in the Council brought the monarchy in touch with every corner of the land. The king was practically, and not merely theoretically, the fount of justice. Ferdinand and Isabella sat in judgement every week, and this was regarded as part of the royal duty. No pains were spared to make justice adequate and pure. There were Chanceries or Audiences, that is, Courts of Appeal, at Valladolid for the country north of the Tagus, and at Granada for the south. Each of these had its civil and criminal section. Another judicial body accompanied the Court, while Seville and Galicia had their separate Audiences. In each Court there were paid advocates for the poor ; exces- sive appeals were prevented by a pecuniary limitation, and by arrangements for fresh trial by an aftbrced bench in the local courts. Between the great Courts, the rising power of the town corregidores, and the Hermandad, the provincial officers of 24 Spain. justice withered away, the king in important cases preferring to send temporary commissions from the Court. A peculiar feature were the \\\%'^qc\.qx's,, pesquisidores or veedores, who kept touch between the Court and the local magistracy, making rounds to enquire into abuses, to force the corregidores to do their duty, to prevent the encroachments of the magnates on the ecclesiastical courts, to inspect prisons, to examine the condition of fortresses, roads and bridges, and the collection of the taxes. The ideal of justice was in Castile extraordinarily high; a glance at the petitions presented at any session of Cortes will prove the importance attributed to it. Yet there were chronic evils in corruption and undue influence, not completely checked by the practice of annual appointment, and by rigorous examination at the close of office. The contrast between the ideal of honour and the practice of pecuniary corruption has always been a peculiar feature of Spain and her settlements. If the Council of Finance was still closely connected with that of Castile, the Council of Aragon was necessarily distinct. As the king was usually absent from Aragon, which was only personally united to Castile, he was advised by Aragonese subjects, constantly in attendance on his person. This pre- cedent probably decided the question whether, when adminis- tration became more complex, the Council should be divided into committees and so preserve its unity, or whether for each distinct department a separate Council should be created. Thus during the joint reign the Councils of the Inquisition, of the Military Orders, and temporarily that of the Hermandad, were created. These were followed under Ferdinand's regency by that of the Bull of Cruzada, which administered the pro- ceeds of the Sale of Indulgences. Little need here be said of the institutions of Aragon, because, interesting as they are, they affected but little the general course of Spanish history. The kingdoms of Aragon and Valencia and the principaHty of Catalonia were in extent Ferdinand and Isabella. 25 less than a quarter of the kingdom of Castile. The three states themselves were only united by a personal tie ; each had its separate Cortes, its distinct institutions. The power of the Crown was small; to the days of the Bourbons Aragon was described as a republic of which the king was only presi- dent. The Cortes of Catalonia and of Valencia were of the usual type, comprising the three estates. Those of Aragon, however, possessed the peculiarity that the great nobles formed a separate estate from the lesser gentry. These magnates could attend by proxy and in their estate unanimity was required. The powers of the Aragonese Cortes were very wide. Redress preceded supply, and supply was granted with extreme reluctance. Every law required the assent of each of the four estates. A standing committee of the four estates exercised considerable control over the executive, especially in the department of taxation. The judicial system also possessed a peculiar feature in the office of the Justicia. His functions were to protect individual liberty and the fueros of the kingdom against the encroach- ments of the ordinary courts. By his firma he could protect the person and property of any who complained that a fiiero was being violated. By the right named vianifestacion he could remove to his own prison any who appealed to him until the case had been decided by the competent court. He thus stood between the people and the ordinary tribunals, and more particularly between the nobles and the Crown. This great official was appointed by the Crown, but could only be re- moved by the Cortes ; in the time of Ferdinand the office was virtually hereditary in the house of Lanuza. There was a growing tendency to check the power of the Justicia^ both on the part of the Crown and of the Cortes. The Cortes employed the agency of his two lieutenants, who were annually drawn by lot, while a parliamentary committee was each year appointed to receive complaints. Ferdinand, on his side, from 1493 imposed upon \\\c Justicia a board of five 26 Spain. legal assessors, whereas of old he was at liberty to choose his own. The constitutional liberties of Aragon had their darker side. Individual liberty was often a high-sounding term for brigandage and vendetta. The nobles were all-powerful ; to their wretched tenants were extended none of the guarantees so liberally granted to other orders. Between nobles and towns, between municipal governments and artisans, feeling ran high and hot. The Crown resented the insolent independence of its kingdom. "Aragon is not ours," Isabella would say, "we ought to conquer it." The royal revenues in Castile were derived in the first place from its extensive domains, from mines and the mono- poly of salt. There was, however, a prodigal habit of alienation. Lands had been lavished to win support, to raise ready money, to pamper favourites. An equally ruinous system was the practice of mortgage or Juros, which was applied also to the taxes. The Crown raised a loan, and assigned the product of certain estates or taxes in payment of interest, often at the rate of ten per cent. In spite of her large resumptions, Isabella soon renewed this practice. The revenues of the grand- masterships added largely, as has been seen, to the royal revenue. The Indies also were a new source of wealth, but until Charles' reign the returns were of uncertain amount and probably not large. The royalty consisted of one- fifth of all precious metals, while there was an export and an import duty of one-eighth. The most important of the taxes was the a/cabala, originally an extraordinary tax, which later became part of the royal revenue. This tax was a duty of one-tenth of the value of everything sold, and it was usually farmed. Ferdinand and Isabella often accepted a commutation, which the town raised as it pleased and paid direct to the Crown : this proved a great economy to both parties. The import and export duties at the sea-ports amounted to one-eighth, and so also at the Ferdmand and Isabella. 27 'dry-ports' on the frontiers of Aragon and Portugal. Tolls were levied on the sheep and cattle moving from their commune, or from the winter pastures of Estremadura to the mountains. Finally, the Servicio, the subsidy demanded at each session of the Cortes, became more and more essential. Ecclesiastical taxation formed an important element. The two-ninths of the tithes had been permanently granted. The Pope from time to time for special reasons conferred upon the Crown the stissidio, a tenth of ecclesiastical revenue. The Bull of Cruzada was a dispensation from the more extreme forms of Lenten abstinence, and was practically forced upon the people for a money payment. Originally granted for war against the Moors, it became an almost regular item of royal revenue. Under the head of ecclesiastical resources may also be mentioned the confiscations inflicted by the Inquisition, of which the Crown reaped the benefit. Revenue was almost wholly derived from Castile. Aragon and its dependencies contributed Httle. The Cortes were here so troublesome that Ferdinand rarely summoned them. The domains of the three kingdoms were deeply pledged, yet Catalonia was very prosper- ous. Sicily, and afterwards Naples, were heavily taxed, but the regular receipts and the subsidies granted by their Parliaments did little more than meet the local expenses of administration and defence. Previous to the war of Granada the army had been purely mediaeval, consisting of the military orders and their tenants, the feudal levies, and the militia of the towns, each body comprising cavalry and infantry. In this war the archers of the Hermandad appeared as a regular force, and Ferdinand kept increasing the gendarmerie, until the corps reached some 3000 men, of whom two-thirds were light horse. After the Italian wars, the enrolment of Stradiots from Albania, and of mounted harquebusiers, raised the cavalry to more than 4000 men. The light horse were admirable of their kind, but the "heavies" were never equal to the French, and the best troopers 28 spam. in Spanish service were, perhaps, the Walloon or Italian auxili- aries or mercenaries. The feudal levies were, after the war of Granada, replaced by a militia proper. One man in twelve was drawn ; the force received pay and was regularly reviewed; it was liable to service at home and abroad. This system, like that of the French franc-archers, was cheap but inefficient, and owing to the distant African and Italian wars it gave way to a regular mercenary force of professional soldiers, who were, however, disbanded at the close of war, and lived as best they could until there was fresh employment. Gonsalvo de Cordoba was unquestionably the creator of the Spanish infantry in its more celebrated form. It was originally armed with sword, shield and javelin, but in the Italian wars, finding it unable to meet the Swiss in French service, he intro- duced the pike and harquebus. Henceforth each of ten companies contained 200 pikes, 200 swords and 100 harque- buses, while two more were exclusively armed with pikes. As was natural in mountain warfare, the unit was at first small, the company of 500 men. After passing through an intermediate stage, termed the coronelia, under Gonsalvo, it became in the reign of Charles the far-famed tercio consisting of three coronelias or twelve companies of 500. These legions of 6000 men were named after their original headquarters, Naples, Sicily, Lom- bardy, and Malaga. The Moorish War had been mainly a war of sieges, and had really been decided, as the Anglo-French War (14 15 — 53) in its later stages, by artillery. What the two brothers Bureau were to Charles VII, Francisco Ramirez was to the Spanish Crown. Ferdinand devoted great attention to this arm, but under himself and his successor the guns were chiefly made in Germany, and Germans also were the more experienced gunners. The ex-corsair Pedro Navarro, who originally learnt his trade in Florentine service, revolutionised the art of en- gineering, especially in the mining department. To him Ferdinand and Isabella. 29 Gonsalvo's success in South Italy was greatly due. After Pedro's capture at Ravenna, Ferdinand had refused to ransom him, and he passed into French service. Gonsalvo retired to his estates in something like disgrace \ Antonio de Leyva was perhaps the best Spanish general that Ferdinand bequeathed to Charles. The Spaniards were admirable military material. Sober and temperate, they were more easily provisioned than any European troops except the Turks. This was of especial consequence in the Neapolitan campaigns, where the French always suffered from wastefulness and excess. In physique the Spaniards were short but muscular and lissom. When the pike was introduced, the Venetian Quirini feared that in this solid formation they might lose the advantage of their activity. Drawn from mountainous districts, at seasons very hot and very cold, Spanish troops could stand climatic changes, and have always been celebrated for marching powers. Peculiarly uneducated, they had remarkable natural intelligence in soldiery, and hence made excellent marksmen, learning easily the art of cover and of reserving fire. Though the esprit de corps and sense of military honour were higher than in any other nation, yet the Spaniards had no false shame in declining action with superior forces ; they seldom attacked except at an advantage. They distinguished themselves especially in the attack and defence of fortresses, and in retreats. Military discipline was easily learnt, but, as Ferdinand confessed, Spanish troops required a very strong hand. Serving as mercenaries they were mutinous if unpaid, but even in mutiny they preserved their military consistency under elected oflicers, and were therefore the more dangerous. No reign, perhaps, can compare in volume and variety with that of the Catholic kings. From their untiring minister Jime'nez to the ragged uplander who was shipped to Messina with one of Gonsalvo's drafts, or to the long-shore boatman who sailed with Columbus for Heaven knew where, every Spaniard seemed infected with his rulers' energy. Within 30 Spain. these thirty years Spain laid her hand heavily on Italy and America, lightly, perhaps too lightly, upon Africa. Yet more marvellous than the energy was the discipline. A dis- orderly nobility, a dissipated priesthood bowed to a yoke that was at once political and spiritual. A standard of justice and of religion was set up, which might never be attained, but which for generations served as an ideal towards which national aspirations strove. The result was the more remarkable in that energy and discipline were the very qualities which seemed incompatible with the indolence and pride which trained Italian observers noted as the national characteristics. How long would pride submit to discipline, and energy overmaster indolence ? At all events the aims were set for posterity and the instruments lay ready to hand. With a disciplined infantry, a guileful diplomacy, a purified Church, Spain was fully equipped for the conquest of territory or the control of opinion. Impoverishment and exhaustion might have been foreseen, but it would have been difiicult to predict whether this new pushing power had, in her army and her Inquisition, forged the tools of reaction or of reform. SECTION II. PHILIP I AND THE REGENCY OF FERDINAND, 1504 — 1 5 16. CHARLES I (V), 1 5 16 — 1529. Isabella was well aware that the mental derangement of her daughter Juana rendered her unfit to reign. She therefore bequeathed to Ferdinand the regency of Castile, until her grandson, Charles, born in 1500, should be of age; the Cortes duly confirmed her will. The supremacy of the Crown had seemed complete, yet Castilian character was not profoundly altered. Strong abroad through his diplomacy, his alliances, his army, Ferdinand was weak at home. Castile resented the rule of an Aragonese. His second marriage was unpopular; it was believed that, if he had issue, he would separate Aragon from Castile, or subject Castile to a king with no Castilian blood. Juana's husband, Philip, was intriguing with the nobles ; even Gonsalvo de Cordoba was suspected of infidelity. When Philip and Juana landed (1506), the magnates seized the opportunity of recovering their power; one by one they fell away from Ferdinand. The Aragonese king had not Isabella's sympathy with the towns, he had looked askance at their extensive privileges. Left defenceless he surrendered the regency and sailed to secure Naples. Philip kept Juana in close confinement and ruled alone. Flemings or favourites filled every place of trust. Of the nobles some grovelled before the throne, others were in rebellion. In Andalusia the old faction fights blazed out ^2 Spam. anew. Philip recklessly alienated the royal revenues and shghted the Inquisition. His death (September, 1506) came as a relief. Juana's condition was aggravated by her hysterical grief, and Philip's party wished the Emperor Maximilian to assume the regency for his grandson. Public opinion, however, turned towards Ferdinand. The magnates who remained in arms were easily reduced ; the military spirit was diverted to Africa, Navarre or Italy ; Ferdinand working hand-in-hand with Jimenez had little trouble for the remainder of his regency. Ferdinand's intentions as to his succession have been much debated. His favourite grandson was Charles' younger brother, Ferdinand, who had been educated as a Spaniard. Should this boy be king of Aragon ? Should a kingdom be manufactured for him in Italy? Should he be, as regent, virtual ruler of Spain, while Charles directly administered the Netherland and German possessions of the Hapsburgs? It has been thought that the French victory at Marignano and the threatening attitude of the Castilian nobles induced Ferdinand to abandon any thought of partition. But all this is guesswork. On Ferdinand's death (1516) Charles succeeded, in nominal conjunction with his mother, to Castile and Aragon. Jime'nez was left as regent until Charles' arrival. Again the nobles struggled for power, some by open revolt, others by making the Council of State an instrument of oligarchy. Once more Jimenez held them down. The story is told that they demanded to see his authority: "There," he answered, *'is my authority," as he pointed to the park of artillery beneath the palace windows. Yet he failed to create an urban militia which should overawe the magnates, and they successfully intrigued against him at Charles' court. Jime'nez protested against the growing foreign influence in Castile, against the vi^ithdrawal of revenue to Flanders, which prevented the due defence of land and sea ; he unceremoniously thrust aside Adrian of Utrecht, Charles' tutor, who was sent as coadjutor in the regency. But Jime'nez never sv/erved from The reign of Charles I ( V). 33 loyalty. In defiance of public opinion he proclaimed Charles as king, and stifled the pretensions of young Ferdinand to an independent authority. The reign of Charles opened under auspices of ill-omen. He seemed intentionally to alienate affection. Above all things Castilians craved for a resident king. Yet twenty months expired before Charles landed, under stress of weather, in the wilds of Asturias. For two months more he wandered about by-roads, entering no important town. It was alleged that he was reluctant to meet Jimenez; his heartless lettei which ordered the Cardinal's retirement was coincident with the old statesman's death. Then at lengi.h (November 15 17) Charles entered Valladolid, but in all this interval he had not learned Castilian. His minister Guillaume de Croy, lord of Chievres, was practically absolute. He was believed already to have sacrificed Spain to secure French friendship for the Netherlands. Toledo, the primacy of Spain, was given to his boy nephew. Another Fleming, Sauvage, was Chancellor. Flemings monopolised all posts of profit, they swept Spain bare of her currency, they studiously insulted the Castilian nobles. Some exaggeration there may have been, but con- temporary Italians confirm Spanish accounts of their vulgarity and greed. Adrian of Utrecht, himself a Netherlander, earnestly warned Charles against these abuses. The powerful city of Toledo was exasperated by the nomination of a foreigner to its see, and by the confiscation of the large fortune which Jimenez had bequeathed to local charities. When Charles summoned his first Cortes to Valladolid the friction was unmistakeable. A deputy for Burgos, Dr Zumel, lieaded an outspoken opposition. Charles was not recognised as joint ruler with his mother until he had sworn to maintain Castilian privileges and to exclude foreigners from office. Then at length a subsidy was granted, but the towns reserved the right of collection and would concede no otlier until the expiry of the three annual instalments. H. s. X 34 Spain. In Aragon opposition was yet more pronounced. Charles, it was argued, could not summon the Cortes until he was king, and king he could not be until he had taken the oath before the standing Committee. The oath taken, the Cortes raised the objection that they had already recognised Juana. Disputes were perhaps purposely prolonged because the muni- cipality of Saragossa reaped a rich harvest from its monopoly of provisions, which ruined the Court and starved the poor. A popular rising against the nobles and the burghers turned the scales in Charles' favour. Yet the scanty subsidy, when granted, by no means met the expenses of obtaining it. That an epidemic carried off many of the foreigners was no great loss ; the Chancellor Sauvage was succeeded by Gattinara, a clever indefatigable Piedmontese, who knew Spain well. From May 15 18 to January 15 19 Charles was occupied in this wrangle. For yet another year he was the sport of the mocking Cata- lans in their Cortes of Barcelona. Here he received the news of his election as Emperor in Maximilian's place. The delays had made it impossible to receive the recognition of Valencia. War with France was certain; to visit Valencia was to risk the alliance of England and the fidelity of Germany. Meanwhile Castihan discontent had grown. Why, it was asked, had the great kingdom yielded so readily, when the pigmy states of Aragon and Catalonia held out so long? Charles had broken all his promises ; he had sent Ferdinand out of Spain ; he was rejecting a Portuguese for an English marriage ; he was heaping offices upon Flemings ; he had farmed the rising taxes to money-lenders; he was already demanding a fresh subsidy for objects which Spain disliked: instead of residing he was hurrying to England and Germany ; he had summoned the Cortes to Santiago in Galicia beyond the border of Castile, an unprecedented departure from custom which entailed grave expenses on the towns. Discontent led to the unconstitutional action of Toledo, which substituted The reign of C/iaj'les T ( V). 35 irregular deputies for the proctors duly drawn by lot ; to the violent rising at Valladolid, which Charles escaped by minutes only; and to the organised opposition of the Cortes at Santiago. Charles, finding a subsidy refused, transferred the Cortes to Corunna, and here by intimidation and corruption manu- factured a majority. Indignation culminated when Adrian was appointed regent; he had, indeed, protested that Castile was for Castilians, but he was no Spaniard and no statesman. It had seemed antecedently probable that civil conflict in Spain would be between Crown and nobles. Events proved the contrary. The humiliation of the grandees had increased the pretensions of the towns. Hitherto the Third Estate had been in harmony with the Crown, but when differences arose the towns resolved to show that they had outgrown their leading-strings. Before Charles left Corunna the revolt broke out, spreading speedily from Toledo to Segovia, Burgos and Zamora. It took the form of attacks on deputies who had voted the subsidy, on foreign merchants, and government officials. If the pro- scribed individuals escaped, their furniture, their very cocks and hens were thrown into a bonfire. The movement was not always democratic. Among the leaders was Pedro de Giron, an Andalusian magnate with a long record of faction and rebellion. More characteristic were Juan de Padilla and Pedro Laso, both noblemen actively engaged in the municipal affairs of Toledo. It is noticeable that in their first manifesto they denounced Charles' alleged breaches of noble privilege. The greater nobles were generally neutral, though some- times sympathising with the revolt ; Adrian even informed Charles that the wires were pulled by the grandees. Leading municipal families, noble, legal or commercial, were often actively engaged. In the clothworking towns, however, the artisans were soon found in the forefront. At Madrid, Guadalajara and Siguenza the democracy overthrew the existing government and excluded nobles from office; at 36 Spain. Segovia the gentry were from the first in danger. Most radical of all the leaders was Antonio de Acuiia, Bishop of Zamora, who enrolled the lower clergy and the friars. The regent had few troops and no resources; his only allies were officials of evil reputation, the lost souls of abso- lutism. An attack upon Segovia united the moderates with the mob. The royalists, in attempting to seize the artillery parked at Medina del Campo, burnt the town. This was the bapthne defeii of the revolution. Indignation spread revolt throughout New and Old Castile and thence to Jaen and Murcia. In Andalusia it was rather a recrudescence of local feuds than organised resistance to the government. Of this the real area lay between the Douro and the Tagus, the very heart of Castile. There was at first no profession of fighting against the Crown: the revolution was conducted in the names of Juana and Charles. A few, indeed, wished to make Juana's power actual, and Acuna vapoured of Italian republics and their liberty. How far could towns with different traditions and separated by difficult country combine in revolution? The central provisional government, the Santa Junta, was organised at Avila (August 1520). This was the geographical centre of disturbance, as being on the border line of Old and New Castile. The regent and his Council were deposed; the Junta declared the supreme royal authority. Padilla surprised Tordesillas, where Juana lived, and broke up and imprisoned the royal Council. The news flashed through Spain that Juana was not mad and that she sympathised with the Junta. Had she signed a document Charles was lost. But, excited as she was at first, she soon relapsed into sullen neutrality ; the entreaties and threats of the Junta could wring nothing from her obstinate reserve. The rebellion was spoiled by meeting with no resistance. The Junta instead of destroying the few remnants of royal government memorialised the absent Emperor. The eighty- TJie reign of Charles I ( V). 37 two clauses of the petition embody an epitome of past, present and future discontents. The dislilce for foreigners was mani- fested in the demand for their exclusion from magistracies and benefices, from household or military service; in the protest against letters of naturalisation. For native manufactures the preemption of Spanish wool was claimed, and the extension to foreign goods of the stringent supervision over home-made cloth. The petitioners complained that Castile was ruined by the withdrawal of the precious metals ; they denounced the export of cattle, sheep and pigs as having trebled the price of meat, candles and shoes ; fearing the diversion of the American trade to Flanders, they would confine it to Castilians, and retain Seville as the sole authorised port. In relation to the Indies one unselfish touch is found ; public opinion had been stirred by the preaching of Las Casas, and the Junta stigmatised the leasing of gangs of natives for forced labour in the mines as the virtual enslavement of a Christian people, for which the increased output of gold and silver was no excuse. Ecclesiastical and judicial abuses form the refrain of each successive Cortes. The Junta too demanded that magistracies should not be granted to the nobles' nominees nor to youngsters fresh from the Universities : the courts should be periodically inspected, the conduct of outgoing magistrates strictly scruti- nised: all municipal offices must be annual and elective, no corregidor should be appointed except on petition by a town. The sale of offices and the promise of reversions was pro- nounced a detestable system. Under equal condemnation fell the arbitrary transference of cases from local to royal courts, the payment of judges by fees and fines instead of salary, the promise of confiscated property before sentence, the plurality of offices. The encroachments and expenses of the ecclesiastical courts were the subject of fierce attack. For the Cortes was claimed the decision whether the Bulls of Cruzada for the sale of Indulgences should be published ; it was insisted that their 38 Spain. purchase must be purely voluntary, and not forced on the people by itinerant friars who, to gain their small commission, kept the congregation whole days in church, and refused absolution to all who would not buy. Non-residence and its attendant evils were ascribed to Roman influences, to the practise of provisions, reservations and pensions on Spanish sees ; the only remedy was compulsory residence and the non- payment of the stipend during absence. The petition did not spare the more direct abuses of Charles' government. The king's table, it protested, cost tenfold that of his predecessors ; the system of purveyance, grosser in Castile than in any other Christian or pagan land, had spread from the royal suite to judicial and financial officers, to police, to noblemen and prelates. It was insisted that old arrears of the Alcahala should be written off, that it should be collected by the towns and commuted, in spite of the rise of prices, at the rate fixed in Isabella's will. So far the proposals were conservative in their general drift, but this conservatism was but a stalking-horse for revolu- tion. It was demanded that the constitution of the Cortes should be radically changed ; that in each represented town the clergy, the gentry and the commons should respectively elect a proctor, who should be bound by pledges to vote ac- cording to his constituency's will ; that these delegates should debate in private, and that death should be the penalty for receiving a gratuity from the Crown, direct or indirect : every three years the Cortes should meet, with or without summons, while the notaries who attended should be their officials and not the king's. The sessions of Santiago and Corunna were pronounced unconstitutional, the subsidy and gratuities voided. Less academic was the Junta's attitude towards the nobles, whom the petition debarred from office in the revenue or domain or royal fortresses : their towns and villages, previously exempted, must be assessed, and lands, rents and services illegally appropriated restored witliin six months; the Crown The reign of Charles I ( V). 39 should redeem the older assignations upon revenue and resume without compensation grants subsequent to 1504. The grant of letters of nobility by the Crown was denounced as being prejudicial to the remaining tax-payers. Charles himself was ordered to return, reside and marry, to revoke immediately Adrian's commission, to dismiss all officers who had offended the communes, to deprive of office for ever the members of the Councils of State and Castile. Henceforth during the king's absence or minority the regent must be a native, acceptable to the people, elected by Cortes and the Council of Castile. The drafting of Utopian programmes is not statesmanship. The attitude of the Junta towards the nobles drove them for refuge to the Crown. Charles corrected his great mistake as the Communes committed theirs. He nominated as co-regents with Adrian the Constable and Admiral, the chief titular officials of Castile ; he threw himself upon the loyalty of the nobles. Feigning a consciousness of strength he empowered the regents to summon Cortes, but to abate not a jot of the prerogative ; towns, which refused to attend, should for ever forfeit their representation ; the Junta must be immediately dissolved. The fortunes of the Communes began to flag. Their power was after all confined to the two Castiles, with outposts in Galicia, Navarre and Murcia. Andalusia and Granada, as a whole, were loyal. At Santiago and Corunna their deputies had been outspoken, those of Cordoba had refused the subsidy. But in the king's absence they would join no unlawful associa- tion. Seville and Cordoba, realising that in noble factions lay the germ of civil war, requested the magnates to withdraw beyond their walls, and rigorously forbade any armed gather- ings round the noble houses. At Cordoba a price was put on the head of a friar and a shoemaker, the agents of revolt among the masses. Finally at La Rambla these towns formed a loyal union of Andalusia, which offered to the king 6odo 40 Spain. horse and 20000 foot if only he would return to Spain unac- companied by foreign troops. In the North the Communes suffered actual shrinkage. Opinion was long divided in Burgos, which lay on the extreme fringe of the area of rebellion, and was jealous of the influence of Toledo. It now seceded and admitted the Constable ; Dr Zumel, the first leader of the constitutional opposition, became a loyalist. Hitherto there had been little fighting, because the Communes had no enemy to fight. Now each town was harassed by its traditional foe. Sometimes even within a city civil war swept down the street and up the very aisles of the Cathedral. Valladolid had become the insurgents' military centre, but their mistake in not early seizing Simancas, the only royalist town, with its strong castle on the Pisuerga, made communications difiicult. The royalists although inferior in wealth and numbers were allowed to surprise Tordesillas; they thus recovered possession of the person of Juana and imprisoned the members of the Junta who were with her. Not only was there shrinkage at the circumference of revolt, there was cleavage at its very centre. The first leader Padilla had been superseded by the Andalusian noble Pedro de Giron : the latter, when suspected of treason, sullenly withdrew to his estates. Then followed the contest for command between Padilla, the showy soldier, pushed into prominence by his brilliant wife, and Laso, the capable politician. The mob beat the moderates and elected Padilla ; Laso and the Junta began to look towards compromise with the Crown. Of all the rebel leaders the most radical, the most inflam- matory was the Bishop of Zamora. Forming his lower clergy and the friars into regiments, feeding the war with the plunder of churches and monasteries, he had fiinned the passions of the people by midnight services, by wild processions where the torchlight fell upon a medley of crucifix and pike. He had operated chiefly in tlie north-western districts, but hearing that the Prior of San Juan was threatening Toledo he marched The reign of Cliarlcs / (V). 41 southwards to its relief. At this moment the news arrived of the young Flemish archbishop's death. The mob hoisted the Bishop upon their shoulders, and seated him on the primate's throne. Even this "Second Luther," as he was termed at Rome, could not accept election so uncanonical. He strove to starve the chapter into electing him, but Castilian sobriety- stood the canons in good stead. The Bishop's violence set all moderate and religious men against him ; the clergy who had once preached war now began to plead for peace. The Prior, moreover, proved more competent in the field than did the Bishop. The conflict had now settled down into a social war. The Communes had protested against the appropriation of royal lands by nobles ; but they had themselves seized not only lands, but mines and saltworks, the proceeds of the Alcabala^ and of the Bulls of Cruzada. Not content with this, they confiscated the possessions of the nobles in the towns, threat- ened their rural estates, harried their sheep. The revolutionary movement spread from the towns to the peasantry and seemed likely to become a Jacquerie. The last act of the Communes before the end was to enrol bands for the express purpose of pillaging the nobles' houses. Meanwhile the magnates were themselves divided. The Constable insisted on rigorous repression, the Admiral on a generous compromise. Left by Charles without resources, many thought of making terms to save their lands and cattle. They were so jealous, wrote Adrian, that any noble would gladly lose an eye if it cost one to his rival. Yet they were more patient than their enemies. While the Constable collected troops, the Admiral detached the moderates ; the revolutionary party had broken up 'before the final action of Villalar. The popular hero Padilla showed little military competence. He did, indeed, storm the strong position of Torrclobaton, but he did not follow up this brilliant action. At length becoming aware of his isolation, he moved westwards to effect a junction 42 Spain. with the forces of the western Communes. The nobles fol- lowed with their cavalry and light guns. In pouring rain the rebel foot pressed forward to gain the shelter of Villalar. The loyal cavalry felt their yielding flanks, and threw in a few shots from their guns. The heavier artillery of the Communes stuck in the mud, and the gunners deserted. Then the loyalist horse were on them ; there was a wild rout \ only five rebels really fought, only one of their opponents fell (April 15 21). On the next day Padilla and two other leaders were executed. In the North there was no further resistance ; Toledo made a gallant resistance under Padilla's widow, who stained her heroism by treasonable intrigue with France. Acuna aided her until he saw that the game was played out ; then he fled, to be captured just as he reached the French frontier. The widow, more fortunate, escaped with her family to Portugal. The war of classes had gone against the masses. When all was over Charles returned. He had scarcely raised a finger to suppress revolt, he had not lent a ducat or a man to the cause which was originally his. Perhaps he was not unwise ; he had not been brought into direct conflict with his subjects ; he had beaten one dangerous element by another. On his first visit Charles had brought his Flemish courtiers, on his second he was accompanied by some 4000 German foot, and a train of German artillery. The nobles after their victory had been scrupulously moderate ; Charles was not cruel, but he was obstinate and knew no compassion. Scarcely 300 rebels were excluded from the amnesty, and few of these sufi"ered in person. But the penalties dragged on. The nobles in vain implored their sovereign to forgive; even after the victory of Pavia the friar Antonio de Guevara must needs plead for pardon so long deferred. A rising in Valencia preceded and outlasted that of the Communes. With the latter it had no original connection, it was rather social than constitutional, the result of long ill- feeling between the gentry, who dominated the Cortes and The reign of Charles I { V). ■ 43 judicature, and the thriving middle and lower classes, espe- cially in the capital. Early in 15 19 Moorish corsairs had hovered off Valencia. Owing to the absence of the gentry during the plague, defence had devolved on the artisans, who thus gained a military organisation. This was followed by a political organisation of their several trade-guilds in a league, termed the Gcnnam'a. The Crown meanwhile was at cross purposes with the nobles and the Cortes, owing to Charles' refusal to visit Valencia to receive and take the oath on his accession (October, 15 19). When Adrian appeared in January 1520, the Cortes absolutely declined to recognise a mere representa- tive, and they were undoubtedly in the right. Even before this the government had coquetted with the Germania ; it now definitely recognised its organisation, and Adrian formally reviewed the armed trades. From Corunna Charles ordered that one-third of the municipal magistrates should be plebeians, yet he left in Diego de Mendoza a viceroy acceptable to the nobles. The Crown trifled with the situation ; wishing to em- barrass the nobility it underrated the gravity of the movement. The trades, half encouraged and half irritated, took the law into their own hands. They formed of sailors, artisans and peasants a Committee of Thirteen, which was interided to be permanent ; it was agreed that at least one member should always represent the peasantry, one the velvet and two the woollen trade. An active propaganda throughout the kingdom produced corresponding committees in other towns. The lower classes, flying to arms, swept all before them, massacring defenceless nobles with their wives and children. The gentry concentrated for defence at Denia in the southernmost corner of the kingdom, while Valencia, Jativa and Alcira were the centres of revolution. In this revolt the social line was absolutely distinct; no noble fought for the Germania, every town but Morella sent a contingent to the commons. The middle class early shrank back 44 Spain. from the conflict and finally joined the nobles. The Thirteen of Valencia themselves were soon outpaced and lost control ; the original leader died broken-hearted at the atrocities of the extremists. The clergy were divided, some preaching against excesses, others stimulating the infuriated mobs. The Moorish peasants on the lords' estates rose in defence of their masters, but were forced to baptism or exterminated by the commons. Nor were these always alternatives — " Plenty of souls for heaven and plenty of money for our pockets," was the cry, when 600 Moorish peasants were first baptized and then hewn to pieces. Revolution seemed likely to spread beyond Valencia; it just crossed the southern border of Aragon, while in Majorca the war of classes was internecine. At length the nobles, reinforced from Murcia and Andalusia, took Valencia. But the insurgent leader, Vicente Peris entered by surprise, and a fierce street fight ensued. Five thousand noble troops stormed the rebels' quarter house by house, under a hail of tiles, crockery, furniture and boiling water. Peris was dragged from his home and killed. Valencia itself was subdued, but the revolution flickered up again in Jativa and Alcira under a picturesque impostor, who professed to be a son of the deceased Infante Juan, Charles was now in Spain and sent aid to the nobles, who forced the two towns to capitulate (September, 1525). Of the lower classes 14,000 were said to ' have fallen, and their condition permanently deteriorated; the noble victors were well-nigh ruined. The towns had capitulated under promise of amnesty, but Charles would have none of this. The punishment of individuals and corporations was entrusted to the dowager-queen Germaine, and the frivolous Frenchwoman used her authority with ferocity. While Spaniards were flying at each other's throats their ruler was guiding Spain towards the long national conflict, which was only closed by the substitution of Bourbon for Hapsburg. Ever since the election of Charles to the Empire, war with his rival Francis I became a certainty. In such a The reigji of CJiarlcs I ( F). 45 war Spain had the most direct concern. If Charles held that the duchy of Burgundy had been filched from his patrimony, the Crown of Aragon had under false pretexts extorted the cession of Roussillon, and had driven the French from Naples, the Crown of Castile had robbed the French house of Albret of its Spanish territories. Spanish and French troops had con- tested the dominion of North Italy at Ravenna; Spaniards, but for their general's caution, would have fought shoulder to shoulder with Swiss against French on the field of Marignano. From one grandfather, Maximilian, Charles had inherited hostility to France intermittent and sentimental, but that of the other, Ferdinand, had been practical and ceaseless. To the ruler of the Netherlands peace with France was essential. The government of Philip and that of Charles himself had stood aside in the previous wars, and had even shown strong French sympathies. The treaty of Noyon (15 16), which was Charles' first act after his accession to the Spanish Crown, was denounced in Spain as sacrificing her interests to the com- merce of the Netherlands with France. Twice during the later conflict between Charles and Francis, the Regent of the Netherlands made a separate truce for her provinces, which had no concern in the quarrel. Personal rivalry was, perhaps, the immediate cause of war, but there were national causes of more depth and i)ermanence. It was unjust to urge that the European negotiations which kept Charles from Spain were indifferent to her fortunes. The wars to come were Franco-Spanisk wars for the dominion of Italy ; they had been rendered inevitable by the Spanish occupation of Naples and the French occupation of Milan. Flemish gold and German blood were lavished to maintain for Spain the frontier of the Pyrenees, to win for Spain the passes of the Alps. The combatants were not badly matched. To all appear- ance the Emperor's resources were the greater. Substantial aid from Germany was, however, discounted by the independ- 46 Spain. ence of the princes, and by troubles directly or indirectly springing from the Lutheran movement. The Netherlands had one enemy at their gate and another within their doors. Robert de la Marck from his principality of Bouillon was a constant menace to Luxemburg and Namur. The descendants of Charles the Bold paid dearly for his confiscation of Guelders. The dispossessed Duke not only found a welcome in his own state, but terrorised the provinces lying round the Zuyder Zee. He was, moreover, the French recruiting sergeant for German lanzknechts, and Francis drew as largely from this mercenary market as did Charles. The Swiss, the other great mercenary nation, were divided in the first campaign, but thereafter, according to custom, usually sold their aid to France. In Italy the possession of Naples and Sicily balanced that of Milan. The population of the duchy had within four years learnt to hate the French and to long for the return of the titular duke, Francesco Sforza. On the other hand Charles' reign opened with actual revolt in Sicily, while his ambassador at Rome described the administration of Naples as deplorable. In Spain itself, after the suppression of the Germmiia, the stubborn resistance of the Valencian Moors to conversion employed a considerable royal force, while, of the two chronic factions which divided Navarre, one necessarily looked toward the house of Albret and found support in popular feeling. A glance at the map would seem to show that Charles, especially after the conquest of Milan and Genoa, held France as between the extended finger and thumb, and could at will increase the pressure on her eastern and southern provinces. But the French king had the advantage of acting on interior lines. This was not only militarily, but financially important. The movement of the Imperial troops was ruinously expensive, costing, as Charles complained, at least one-third more than that of the French. Spain was protected by arid stretches of mountains from invasion, but the French kings had long assumed the right of passage through Savoyard territory, and The reign of Charles I ( F). 47 could therefore easily make elbow-room by pushing into Lombardy. The Spanish infantry had a magnificent reputation, but after all it had been beaten at Ravenna. The lustre of Marignano still shone on the French lances and field pieces ; if the native infantry were decidedly inferior to that of Spain, the Swiss and German mercenaries balanced the German and Italian troops of Charles. The French generals, Francis I himself, La Tre'mouille, La Palisse, the Duke of Albany and Bayard would seem to outweigh the Spanish-Italian chiefs, Prospero Colonna, the Marquis of Pescara, Antonio de Leyva. It was no good sign that in Naples alone six generals contested the command-in-chief. Both monarchs were from the first in desperate financial straits. Francis had been unable to utilize his victory of Marignano because the roads in France had been eaten bare, and the taxes for the ensuing year already spent. Charles had to borrow from Henry VIII his passage money to Spain; his ambassador at Rome, Juan Manuel, was crippled with debt incurred on his master's behalf, and plaintively wished that he had the wherewithal to buy his bread. Above all Charles throughout his whole dominions was hampered by Parlia- mentary control over subsidies, from which Francis I was free. France, Louis XI had said, was a fair meadow whose owner could mow it as often as he pleased. With forces so equal much would depend upon alliances. In later days Francis looked mainly to the Lutheran princes and the Turk, but in the present French and Spanish diplo- matists were courting the coyest of princes, the King of England, and the Pope. The Tudor king, inferior to either rival in military power, was sufiiciently strong to hold tlie balance. He could ruin the trade of the Netherlands and make communication with Spain impossible. On the other hand the French coasts from Boulogne to Bayonne lay open to his fleets, and his territorial claims in France might be 48 Spain. the pretext of war and the reward of victory. English revenues were more flourishing than those of France and Spain. No prince, it was said, was so rich in ready money as Henry VIII ; he could finance Swiss or lanzknechts or Italian condottieri. The princess Mary was but a babe, but she was dandled before both courts, and was promised first to the Dauphin and then to the Emperor. Charles, indeed, was told by Cardinal Schomberg that Mary would never marry either, and laughed heartily when it was explained how in time of war the English used princesses as owls for luring birds. Leo X occupied in Italy the position which Henry VIII held in Europe. The Spaniards in Naples and the French in Milan being evenly balanced, Leo, who also controlled Florence, could turn the scale. With Papal aid the Spaniards could march through friendly territory to the Milanese frontier, or the French to that of Naples. Leo X was better armed and wealthier than any previous Pope, he could subsidise the needy Emperor or the spendthrift King A Pope's price was usually the interest of his family. If English princesses were owls, the Papal nipoti were vultures gorged by the battles of the nations. Yet Leo's chief aim was, perhaps, a state sufficiently strong to awe either foreigner. Charles had risked his hold on Spain for a personal interview with Henry VIII. His English visit at least secured friendly neutrality, and discounted the effects of the coming meeting of Henry and Francis at the Field of the Cloth of Gold. It really, moreover, decided the attitude of the Pope, though he pretended to be hard to win. Leo X already dreamed of the marriage of his baby grand-niece, Catherine de' Medici to a French prince, with Naples under his own administration as their appanage. More definite was the demand for the absorption of Ferrara in the Papal States, but the sacrifice of this faithful ally Francis I re- fused. Charles was more generous ; he not only abandoned The reign of Charles I { V). 49 Ferrara, but would detach Parma and Piacenza from Milan. Nor was this all — after his coronation at Aix Charles met the Diet at Worms, where his personal influence determined the condemnation of Luther (May, 1521). This spiritual support of the Papacy decided the political alliance of the Pope. Hostilities had practically begun in March by attacks of Robert de la Marck and the Duke of Guelders on the Netherlands. Francis I, disavowing responsibility, retorted that Charles had encouraged Milanese exiles, had neither paid tribute for Naples, nor done homage for Flanders and Artois. When in May French troops in D'Albret's name overran Navarre, a declaration of war could not be postponed. The French had blundered in delaying until the Comimineros had been beaten. The attack on Navarre made Charles' cause common to all Castile ; even Toledo sent her contingent to fight the French. The Pope, feeling that Charles was now committed, declared his alliance. The German princes, resenting the French king's insult to their elected Emperor, withdrew or modified their opposition to his authority. Immediately before war broke out De Chievres died. In Spanish history he has left an evil name, but he was a good friend to his native Netherlands, and, while abandoning no essential interest, he had skilfully postponed war until Charles could fight at an advantage. In after years Charles spoke of De Chievres with high respect, but henceforth no minister was his master. Ce bon enfant V Empercur, as Leo X called him, entered on his first great war as an autocrat with a will and a policy of his own. It cost four campaigns to expel the French from Lombardy, and to replace their partisans by the Imperialist faction at Genoa. Striking events were few. At the battle of Bicocca the Spaniards had their first marked success against the Swiss. The mountaineers, clamouring for pay, battle, or dismissal, H. s. A 50 Spain. blundered to their doom ; they were mown down by the Spanish harquebusiers crouching in the cornfields before they could push the pike home. Lautrec, the French general, was no match for the cautious Italian veteran Prospero Colonna, who may be said to have introduced the system of a war of positions. Both Lautrec and his successor Bonnivet were outgeneralled by the fiery Neapolitan nobleman Pescara, adored by his soldiers, taking full advantage of the enter- prise and intelligence of the Spanish foot. At the last skirmish on the Sesia, Bayard received his fatal wound after a quarter of a century of Italian fight. Tlie Imperialists had been aided by Milanese hatred for the French ; Italian friars had preached a crusade against the oppressor. But the Emperor's hand was already heavy; he used or abused alleged Imperial prerogatives, which passing centuries had abandoned to the antiquary. His generals enforced by military execution the requisitions assessed upon the free states in proportion to their resources for the support of the Spanish garrisons in Lombardy. Although Francesco Sforza returned to Milan, his investiture with the Duchy was delayed. Venice had passed from the French to the Imperial alliance, but Charles found difficulty in keeping the Papal contingent with his colours. Leo X had just lived to see Parma and Piacenza added to the Papal States. The Conclave after his death was a national struggle between the French and Spanish parties, which his cousin, the Cardinal Medici, decided in Spain's favour. Unable as yet to secure his own promotion, he won the tiara for Adrian of Utrecht (January, 1522). To Charles it was a gain that the unpopular regent, the symbol of Flemish domination, should be removed from Spain on so flattering a pretext. But Adrian was not prepared to be the Imperial tool. From the first he was at disaccord with Juan Manuel ; he would take no share in the alliance against France. Partly Adrian was offended by the arbitrary measures of The reigii of Char Us / {V). 51 Charles' officers in Lombardy, partly he had a heartfelt desire for peace. Only the misconduct of his own Cardinals of the French party drove him to the Emperor's side shortly before his death (September, 1523). The election of the Cardinal Medici as Clement VII in November seemed to make Charles' position at Rome secure ; he had been the life and soul of the Spanish party in Leo X's court. The Duke of Sessa, the new ambassador, assured Charles that his power was now so great that he might convert stones into obedient sons. But Charles was, like others, destined to discover that his Popes were the most deceptive and disappointing of mankind. From 1521 to 1524 there had been desultory fighting on the Flemish and Burgundian frontiers. Henry VIII, after half- hearted efforts at mediation, openly joined the Emperor (1523). English troops twice invaded Picardy, while English squadrons hovered off the Norman and Breton coasts, yet the revival of the old English-Spanish-Burgundian alliance was more inte- resting than important. Within France herself Charles found a strange ally in the greatest French nobleman, the Constable Bourbon (1523). Machiavelli had said that France was only vulnerable through her feudal nobles. Charles exaggerated the importance of Bourbon's defection; he promised him the hand of his sister Eleanor, the widowed Queen of Portugal, and gave other pledges which hampered him hereafter. The French crown had outgrown its great feudatories ; moreover a rebel who runs away hurts no one but himself Bourbon's desertion gave to Charles a brave trooper, a generous recruiter, an importunate suitor, a general conceited above his competence. Imperial success in Lombardy had been marred by a mishap in Spain. The French, invading Navarre, turned suddenly on Fuenterrabia, the key of Guipuscoa, and occupied the strong position in force (September, 1521). Here there was brisk fighting by land and sea, but the professional Spanish soldier found service in the Pyrenees less profitable than in Italy. The French retained their foothold on Spanish soil 4—2 52 Spain. until 1524. The force which ultimately expelled them was of such poor quality that it had immediately afterwards to be disbanded. A similar cause had made an invasion of Guyenne, which Charles intended to lead in person, abortive and ridiculous (1523). The campaign of 1524 in Italy had been fought almost literally to the last crown and the last loaf The Spanish soldier had this advantage, that the loaf lasted him longer than it did the French. The Constable Bourbon had pawned his jewels, the Duke of Sessa his plate, to pay the troops. Charles was so exhausted that he longed for peace, while Francis was equally anxious for a truce. The failure of negotiations made fighting brisker. The allies determined not only to invade but to dismember France. Wolsey had but lately exclaimed that, if peace was ever to exist, the French must be exterminated. While the English were to attack Picardy and the Emperor Languedoc, Bourbon and Pescara were ordered to invade Provence and at all costs to take Marseilles. The invasion of Provence alone really took effect. Had it succeeded the consequences to Spain would have been momen- tous. To Bourbon was promised a kingdom consisting of the two old Imperial fiefs, Dauphine and Provence, and his own possessions in the Bourbonnais. This was no mere war-dream. Dauphine' had lost its independent existence little more than half a century ; the incorporation of Provence with France counted but thirty years, and Charles somewhat relied upon its disaffection. An intermediate kingdom would have barred the access of France to Italy. Marseilles was the port which thwarted Spanish control of the western Mediterranean, threatening at once Genoa and Barcelona. From Marseilles had sailed the fleets which throughout the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries had contested Sicily and Naples with the lords of Aragon. Deprived of Marseilles France would virtually cease to be a Mediterranean power ; the gulf of Lyons would become a Spanish-Italian lake. Bourbon, irreconcileable with The reign of Charles / (V). 53 the French Crown, wedded to the Emperor's sister, might in name have been an English feudatory, but in fact must have become the cHent of the Crown of Spain, until his dynasty was old enough to hold the scales. This very kingdom, with the substitution of Savoy for the Bourbonnais, the gifted Charles Emmanuel within the century well-nigh made a reality. The bulk of Provence was easily occupied, but the invasion met with no co-operation from Emperor or English. Charles' insufficient forces broke against the walls of Marseilles, de- fended by the hatred of its inhabitants for Aragon, and by the skill of the Italian condottierc Renzo da Ceri. Bourbon and Pescara disagreed. The latter complained that Bourbon was always in a passion, as was also the English ambassador who held the purse, — "the captains were between two passions." There was no alternative but a terrible retreat. " Lost an army, somewhere in the mountains of Genoa," was the Roman witticism on the struggle of the Imperialists to regain Lombardy. Francis I, who had gathered a large force upon the Spanish flank at Avignon, stormed over M. Genevre. The French seemed irresistible ; plague and famine opened the gates of Milan. The Imperialist generals skilfully confined defence to two strategic points. The occupation of Pavia would check an advance on Naples, while behind the Adda, guarded by Lodi, reinforcements could be gathered from Tyrol. Francis I must needs besiege one town or the other. He despatched a seemingly sufficient force to hold the Imperialists at Lodi, while in person he sat down before Pavia, which it would have been madness to leave untaken. Francis, however, made too sure of its capture, and weakened his forces by detaching the Duke of All^aiiy to Naples and directing a division against Genoa. The capture of Pavia would have opened communications with Rome and Florence, and the Medicean Pone, lord of 54 Spain. both, inveterate Imperialist as he was beUeved to be, was changing sides. Clement VII made a secret treaty with France ; he allowed the Duke of Albany to levy troops on Papal territory ; he permitted or ordered his cousin Giovanni de' Medici to join Francis with his Black Bands, the choicest troops in Italy. "I hear,"' wrote the Englishman Pace on October 29, 1524, " Francis is about to attack Pavia ; if defeated his whole military reputation is lost, if victorious his object is gained ; at Pavia therefore he ought to be resisted to the uttermost." Charles, as well as Francis, thought that French success was certain, though he was resolved that it should not be final. The campaign of the winter of 1524 — 5 is perhaps the greatest triumph of Spanish arms, though not more than a third of the Imperialist troops were Spaniards, and though a full meed of praise is due to the Frenchman Bourbon and the Suabian Frundsberg. Yet it was Leyva who kept his garrison of Pavia, mainly German, true, and inspired the inhabitants with his own devotion ; it was Pescara, Spaniard by origin and sympathy, who brushed the French army of observation from the line of the Adda, and marched his trained forces and the German levies to the relief of Pavia. The troops were unpaid, un- clothed, unfed ; when an appeal was made to the Spaniards they abandoned their pay, and offered their cloaks, their very shirts to satisfy the Germans. The French were beaten before the great battle was fought. The Spaniards superior in discipline and ingenuity harassed their quarters with camisades, destroying the morale of all but their finest troops. Starvation at length forced the Imperialists to risk their all against an enemy superior in numbers and position. When they broke into the park of Mirabello, the headquarters of the French besieging force, the first triumphant rush of the French cavalry withered away under the sustained fire of the Spanish harque- busiers. At Ravenna the Spanish foot had proved their superiority to French and German infantry, but had succumbed The reign of CJiarlcs I ( V). 55 to the highly-trained Frencli horse. Pa\ia marked their triumph at once over Swiss pikes and French lances. Their fire was mainly responsible for the immortal victory. The older generation of French generals, trained in the wars of three successive reigns, was annihilated at Pavia, and it was long before France replaced it. The king was a prisoner, but this in no way weakened the defensive capabilities of France. We need not here retell the thrice-told tale of the captivity of Francis I. Francis was forced to accept the treaty of Madrid from want of courage to bear captivity. An un- scrupulous character never lacks for consolation. Francis flattered himself that he was no liar because he solemnly stated before a notary that he was lying. Charles V was forced to abate his more extreme pretensions by his absolute inability to pay his victorious army, and by the uprising of Italian sentiment against Spanish sway. England had proved herself an ally at once exacting, ineffective and untrustworthy • it was now certain that Wolsey was leading her into the enemies' camp. Charles' Burgundian inheritance still probably held the first place in his affections. In 1524 he had formulated six alternative schemes for peace with France ; in all the central idea was the interchange of the Duchies of Milan and Bur- gundy. In the treaty of Madrid he abandoned his claim to annex Languedoc to Aragon, but insisted on the cession of Burgundy and of French suzerainty over Flanders, Artois and Tournai. Spanish interests were not, indeed, neglected. Francis was pledged to withdraw support not only from the Duke of Guclders but from the house of Navarre. His abandonment of all Italian claims seemed to secure the supremacy of Spain in the peninsula. But Charles no longer demanded Dauphine' and Provence as an appanage for the Constable Bourbon, and his sister Eleanor was betrothed to the French king instead of to the rebel duke. France thus retained her point of contact with Italy. Meanwhile the attitude of the Italian states had become 56 Spain. most threatening. Clement VII had been "as a dead man" on heaving of Charles' victory. His friendship was of sufficient importance to extort from the Emperor a favourable treaty, but from the other side appeals were made to his Italian patriotism, to his fears of a General Council, to his greed for territorial gain. Other Italian princes were harassed by contributions, their subjects ruined by the starving soldiery. There was in Italy a passionate desire to rid herself of the Spaniard, which would not now imply the reinstatement of the French. The transference of Francis I from an Italian to a Spanish prison caused an agony of alarm ; Charles, it was believed, would make peace with Francis at the expense of Italy, This was no idle fear. The Emperor professed, indeed, to be 'a good Italian.' Flis Council was divided. One party headed by Lannoy, Viceroy of Naples, urged that peace with France was essential, and that Charles must find his compensation in Italy. The Piedmontese Gattinara, hitherto Charles' most influential adviser, pleaded loyally for Italy : there could be no peace until Francis was humbled to the dust : Burgundy would never be surrendered if Francis were suffered to go free : to effect the Emperor's high aims Italy should be made a partner and not a subject : above all the investiture of Milan should be granted to Francesco Sforza as a pledge of honourable intentions. It became clear that Gattinara's influence was waning. Milan, Venice, and the Papal Counsellors, while negotiating for a European league formed a purely ItaHan alliance for Italian liberty- — " Italia fara da se." The aim was to restore the system of the five chief states, as it existed before the disastrous cataclysm of 1494. A Sforza still ruled in Milan, a Medici in Florence ; Venice and the Papacy seemed sub- stantially unchanged. The military monarchy of Naples should provide the soldier who was to rally round him the manhood of Italy, the armed prince who should make Machiavelli's dream a waking reality. The Italianised line of The reign of Charles T ( V). 57 Aragon was, indeed, no more. Could it not be replaced by the one Neapolitan house which, as long as hope existed, had loyally stood by its late mastejs ? D'Avalos, Marquis of Pescara, was a Spaniard by origin, but his family had been naturalised in Naples for nearly a century. If he were virtually Italian, his wife, Vittoria Colonna, the most distinguished woman of Italy, was a Roman of the Romans. Who was more fit then than Pescara to avenge on Charles the treason of Ferdinand to the unfortunate king Frederick? Pescara more than any man had won Pavia for the Emperor, yet he had been deceived and pushed aside by Lannoy ; he had ruined himself to keep the Emperor's armies in the field, and yet was denied the modest rewards that he had claimed. Moreover, the clever Milanese secretary, Pescara's intimate friend, thought that he might be tempted by the Crown of Naples; he would bring to the Italian league the military prestige which its generals lacked. His troops were after all mercenaries ; Spaniards, Germans and Itahans looked rather to the eloquent, liberal, courageous soldier, than to the Flemish Emperor, whom none knew and few respected. The great conflict, which might have been, between Spain and Italy, was decided once for all within Pescara's breast. Spanish traditions or military loyalty kept him true to Spain. He betrayed Morone's confidences, he decoyed the secretary himself, his troops simultaneously occupied Sforza's chief fortresses. The ingenious fabric of Italian liberty fell like a house of cards. Italy by herself, leaderless and divided, was powerless before Spain ; she was only dangerous because she could still lean upon French lances and English money-bags. This aid seemed to be forthcoming. The eternal treaty of friendship between Charles and Francis was immediately fol- lowed by the league of Cognac for the expulsion of Charles from Italy. The Italian opposition to Spanish supremacy in Italy was merged in a European opposition to the universal 58 Spain. dominion which Charles's enemies beUeved him to covet, and to which his friends urged him to aspire. The ItaHan states, Venice, Milan, the Papacy and Florence, were hounded on by France to enter the lists against the Emperor. Henry VIII was named Protector of the Holy League, but although his diplomatic activity had been unceasing, he lent little or no practical assistance. He made it, however, a sine qua no?i that Milan should pass not to the French king, but to its native Duke. Nevertheless Italy was fighting for France rather than for herself. The prospect before Charles in Italy was gloomy in spite of the collapse of the national conspiracy. Papal and Venetian troops Avere marching to the relief of the citadel of Milan, where Francesco Sforza still held out. Pescara was dead, Bourbon had not the same authority with the troops ; these were scattered over Lombardy, alternately plundering and starving. In Milan itself there was a rising of despaii against the Spaniards ; in town and country assassination was daily thinning their numbers. Had the French crossed the Alps, or had the Italians possessed a resolute leader, the doom of the Imperial army was sealed. But the Duke of Urbino, who led the Venetian forces, was caution personified, and no friend of Clement VII and the Medici, who had once robbed him of his state. With their usual tenacity the Spaniards clung to the siege of Milan citadel, and forced Sforza to capitulate. The German condotiiere Frundsberg had led his lanzknechts from Tyrol over Alpine tracks, hitherto un- trodden by armed men. The Imperialists were now stronger and better led than any army which could oppose them. The Duke of Milan had already suffered for his desertion of the Imperial cause; the hour of reckoning was approaching for the Pope. Charles had a long account to settle with Clement VII. It was hard to forgive the Pope's desertion of his cause during the critical months which preceded the battle of Pavia. Since The reign of Charles I ( V). 59 then Clement had wavered between reconciliation with the Emperor and open alliance with France ; exorbitant demands had alternated with time-serving humiliations. The "willing and not willing " brought ruin upon Italy and himself. Lannoy and the Duke of Sessa, now Spanish ambassador at Rome, had striven their utmost for accord. Hugo de Moncada, an envoy extraordinary, an old officer of Caesar Borgia, violent and unscrupulous, employed more drastic measures. Finding his terms rejected he utilised the disaffected house of Colonna to surprise the Vatican ; Clement fleeing to the Castle of Sant' Angelo had a foretaste of horrors to come (September, 1526). Charles, indeed, on Moncada's own advice, disavowed the outrage, and Clement took vengeance on his baronial enemies. The storm was to break not from the South, but from the North, not from Naples but from Milan. In February 1527 Frundsberg's German levies, mainly Lutherans, effected their junction with Bourbon's troops. Mad with hunger and suffering, these 25,000 men staggered through Italy towards Rome, dragging their generals with them. Frundsberg was struck down by paralysis in attempt- ing to quell a mutiny ; Bourbon won the affection, if not the obedience of his men, by showing that he too was a ruined soldier of fortune with the rest. Lannoy made a convention with Clement for the payment of the troops, but neither realised the full danger. They could not believe that an unfed mob, wholly unprovided with artillery, would dare to attack Rome, and, if they did, Renzo da Ceri, who had held Marseilles against the Imperialists, could easily beat them off; the army of the League had followed Bourbon's troops through Italy; a single check must mean the invaders' annihi- lation. This very certainty gave the Imperialists desperate courage. Bourbon was shot as he scaled the walls, but after an hour's fight Rome was at the mercy of the wild horde (May 6, 1527). Clement barely escaped to Sant' Angelo; in the space of three credos more he would have been 6o Spain. caught. Then followed the unutterable horrors of the sack of Rome. A month more, and Sant' Angelo capitulated ; the Pope was now the Emperor's prisoner. It was Charles' fate that all his apparent triumphs turned to gall and wormwood. He wrote to the Princes of Europe expressing his sorrow at the terrible occurrence; he would sooner, he said, be conquered than win such a victory. He ordered his court into mourning, he summarily suspended the rejoicings for the birth of his son Philip, he ordered the clergy to offer prayers for the Pope's liberty. But he took no step to effect this liberty, he resolved to derive full diplomatic advantage from Clement's captivity. Nevertheless his former difficulties were in no sense removed. Plunder does not serve for pay; the only powerful Imperial army was ruined by its excesses. Bourbon was dead and Lannoy was dead. Dead also was the experienced envoy, the Duke of Sessa. The Prince of Orange, the new general, could scarcely rally his troops to fight, while Moncada, now Viceroy of Naples, had none of the antecedents of a peacemaker, France and England had entered into a definite treaty to procure Clement's freedom. Henry VHI, wishing to divorce Catherine, the Emperor's aunt, needed the Pope's favour ; this seemed to promise that his intervention would be serious. Lautrec's French troops poured into North Italy; Pavia and Alessandria fell ; Andrea Doria recovered Genoa for the French faction. This French invasion of Italy was not Charles' only difficulty. In Spain public feeling was outraged by the Pope's ill-treatment. The Duke of Alba and the Archbishop of Toledo had at once protested. It was on the remonstrance of the Grandees that Charles had stopped the festivities of the Court. Quinohes, General of the Franciscans, had told the Emperor that he must release Clement if he did not wish to be dubbed the Lutherans' Captain. All Spaniards rejoiced at Bourbon's death. Spaniards in Italy, indeed, who knew the TJie reign of Charles / {V). 6i Papacy at iirst-hand, regarded the sack of Rome as a divine visitation, they only hoped that God would find its authors worthy. Soria, envoy at Genoa, recommended the extinction of the temporal power, the source of all European wars. Yrom Rome Bartolommeo Gattinara wrote that some sort of Papal government should exist, but entirely under Imperial control. The small but influential party of intellect at Charles' Court, which took Erasmus as its guide, had long written and spoken against the Curia; the two brothers Alfonso and Juan Valde's in the Chancellor's service had far outstripped theii religious leader in the freedom of their opinions. They now fought the Emperor's cause with pamphlet and despatch. But this very fact gave their enemies a handle. Dominicans and Franciscans had thundered against the Erasmian sect, had refused to be silenced by Emperor, Inquisitor General or Pope. They now drew public opinion over to their side. In the Cortes of 1527 the nobles used their class privilege to refuse a subsidy; the clergy declined on the express ground that the war was against the Pope. Under pressure such as this the Imperial agents abated their pretensions. Clement surrendered the military keys of the Papal States and guaranteed the payment of the soldiery. Before the convention was executed he escaped to Orvieto, where, though slieltered by the army of the League, he pro- fessed neutrality. The French troops pushed on towards Naples ; the handful of Imperial troops, evacuating Rome, had only just time to garrison the Southern capital. Moncada engaging the Genoese squadron in the bay was killed, and his ships sunk or taken (April, 1528). A Venetian fleet mean- while was capturing the Emperor's Apulian ports. Spanish power was well-nigh swept from Italy. For all this the Imperial troops clung desperately to their defences. Neglected, unpaid and mutinous as they were, the Spaniards, when it came to fighting, showed their quality. They could be temperate and sober when occasion needed, 62 Spain. whereas the French could never resist the strong, rich Neapolitan wines so fatal to the weak stomachs of their nation. Naples was once more the grave of a French army which rotted in its trenches. Francis I by insane illiberality alienated the real ruler of Genoa, the naval condotiiere, Andrea Doria. His fleet sailed for Naples, not now to attack but to relieve the Spaniards. Lautrec's luckless career was ended by the plague. The remnants of the French army making a forlorn retreat was forced by the Prince of Orange to capitulate at Aversa (August, 1528). The veteran refugee Pedro Navarro died a traitor's death in the castle of Castelnuovo, which he had once won for Ferdinand. One more battle and the war was really over. In Lombardy the French sought to retrieve their Neapolitan disasters. But at Landriano the gouty old general Leyva surprised the dashing young Saint-Pol (April, 1529). Such was the exhaustion of both combatants that this final decisive battle was fought by 8,000 Spaniards against 12,000 French. It was fortunate for Clement that he had so long wavered. The timid neutrality of the Medici at last turned to his advantage. An Anglo-French alliance might, indeed, have avenged his wrongs, have rid him of the spectre of a General Council, have given to the spiritual power its due independence from the authority of Caesar. But Clement was first Medici and then Pope ; even as Pope his temporal outweighed his spiritual interests. On the fall of Rome Florence had expelled the Medicean government. The Papal States were falling to pieces. The Duke of Urbino w^as in possession of Perugia, the Venetians, " stealing the cloaks of those that fought," had slipped into Ravenna and Cervia, a Malatesta returned to Rimini, the Duke of Ferrara held Modena and Reggio. All these were the allies of France; from France therefore the Pope could not expect restitution. This alone Charles, now virtually master of Italy, could grant, and that the Pope had remained neutral when French success seemed certain, made the Emperor his debtor. The reign of Charles / (V). 63 Charles had little lust for world dominion ; he was content with his success ; his finances did not guarantee further triumphs ; in Germany the existence of the Empire and of Catholicism was threatened alike by Turks and Lutherans; Spain was clamouring for peace. Thus it was that in the treaty of Barcelona Clement received generous terms : Charles engaged to restore the integrity of the Pope's dominions, he bound him to his interests by the marriage of his bastard daughter Margaret to Alessandro de' Medici, who was to become Duke of Florence (June, 1529). Henry VIII and Francis I had vainly warned Clement against peace. But Henry also found that war was ruining the Anglo-Flemish trade, while Margaret, Regent of the Netherlands, could extract no more subsidies. Thus a truce was made for England and the Netherlands, a truce which in the clever hands of Margaret and the Queen-mother, Louise of Savoy, expanded into a general peace. In the treaty of Cambray, the Ladies' Peace, the more humiliating concessions forced on Francis at Madrid were waived. Charles consented to release the French princes for a ransom, to leave his claim to Burgundy to legal process. But the French king withdrew his protection from Robert de la Marck and the Duke of Guelders; from Italy he was absolutely excluded (August 15, 1529)- 64 SECTION III. SPAIN AND EUROPE, 1 5 29 — 1 5 56. Charles could at length leave Spain for Italy. He had long craved to be in the forefront of events. His advent, wrote Orange, would be worth 10,000 men. The Italians regarded it with terror; when Charles set foot on shore at Genoa they saw their country under the tyrant's heel. At Bologna Charles received the iron crown of Lombardy, and Clement placed on his head the Imperial coronet (February 1530). The Emperor's generosity was unexpected. The Duke of Ferrara was pardoned for his recent change of sides. Upon Francesco Sforza was conferred the Duchy which he had forfeited. His health was already shattered, but the Emperor gave to him his young niece Christine of Denmark ; there could be faint hope that his line would be perpetuated. Venice made her peace, restoring Ravenna and Cervia to the Pope, and her recent Apulian conquests to the kingdom of Naples. Florence alone held out : the republican party would have no surrender to the Medici. Charles was pledged to his ally ; in the battle of Gavignana, which decided the fate of the RepubHc, the Spanish harquebusiers once more turned the fortune of the day. For a second time the Medici returned to Florence under Spanish escort (August, 1530). To outward appearance Charles had restored Italy to her previous condition before the battle of Marignano had wrested TJie reign of Charles I ( V). 65 LombarJy from a native prince. Yet all men felt that all was altered. The Pope was little more than the Emperor's chap- lain, with the Papal territories for his stipend. The Dukes of Florence, Milan and Savoy, married to a daughter, a niece, a sister-in-law of Charles, were lesser stars in the family constel- lation ; the Dukes of Mantua, Ferrara and Urbino moved in the Imperial orbit. Between Florentine and Papal territory a Spanish garrison nominally protected the Sienese republic against her exiles. Venice was intact and independent, but. once the strongest of the Italian states, slie was relatively weak against a King of Naples who was also King of Spain. Charles gained by his very liberality. By giving the County of Asti, the old possession of the house of Orleans, to the Duke of Savoy he bribed the porter of the Alps to close his gates against the French. Profitable above all was his generosity to Genoa. The town recovered her liberty and her territory; Doria was her truly national and patriotic Doge. But for all this Genoa was for more than two centuries Spain's water-gate to Italy. Through Genoa poured the Spanish levies which were henceforth to hold Lombardy, which tramped over Alpine passes to Franche Comte and the Netherlands, or opened communications with the allied Hapsburgs in Vorarlberg and Tyrol. Henceforth the Spanish Crown found in the Dorias its admirals ; their squadron, the most sea- worthy in Italian waters, was permanently hired to the Kings of Spain. If Spanish supremacy at sea was threatened by Turks and Barbaresques, it had at least established itself at the expense of France. Barcelona and Genoa, Naples and Palermo formed the quadrilateral of the Western Mediter- ranean. Genoa, moreover, was tied to Spain by golden chains ; her bankers fattened on the extravagance of the Spanish Crown and people ; her merchants monopolised the profitable trades in every port of Spain and Sicily. To the ruling capitalist class revolt from Spain meant ruin. From the summer of 1530 to the close of 1532 Charles H. s. c ^ Spain. was in Germany, vainly striving to check the rank growth of heresy. That he was at length forced to make concessions to the Lutheran princes in the compromise of Nuremberg was mainly due to the advance of the Turk upon Vienna. Charles put himself at the head of the Imperial army; but for the Sultan's retreat the Spanish foot would have tested its worth against the Janissaries in the Danube valley. During these years important changes befell Charles's im- mediate circle. On June 5, 1530, died Gattinara, who since the death of Chievres had exercised an important though not a controlling influence. This, however, had waned during Francis I's imprisonment, and Gattinara had been for a season almost in disgrace. Charles's chief ministers were henceforth Granvelle and Cobos, the former undertaking mainly the affairs of the Netherlands and Germany, the latter those of Spain and Italy. In December Charles lost his aunt, Margaret, Regent of the Netherlands, who had acted at once as his mother, and as instructress in the art of policy. She was replaced by his sister Mary, the widowed queen of Hungary, who proved herself as capable, as devoted, and yet more mascuhne. Charles's brother Ferdinand was in January 1 531 elected King of the Romans. Charles thus in the most formal manner secured the succession for the collateral line ; it was a definite proof that Spain had become the centre of his own interests and hopes. A free hand was left to Ferdinand and Mary in their respective spheres. The system may almost be described as a family federation, and may be compared with that of Napoleon in the height of his power. In passing through Italy on his return to Spain Charles formed a defensive league with the Italian states. Yet his hold upon Italy was insecure. Clement was already veering round towards France. In Charles's interest, indeed, he ex- communicated Henry VIII, but he married his cousin, Catherine de' Medici, to the French king's second son, and held a suspicious interview with Francis at Marseilles The reign of Charles I ( V). 6y (November 1533). Francis was intriguing both with Pope and Protestants. At his instance Phihp of Hesse restored the exiled Duke Ulrich to Wiirteniberg ; the rich principality was lost to the Catholic Hapsburgs and won for their Lutheran opponents (1534). Francis, confident in his new alliances, was demanding Milan, Genoa and Asti, when Clement VII died (September 1534). This was the Emperor's gain. The shiftiness of the Medicean Pope had been so incurable, his punishment so terrible, that the Papal-Imperial alliance could never be secure. Clement could never have forgiven Charles, and Charles could never have trusted Clement. The election of Cardinal Farnese as Paul III was hailed as an Imperial victory. Charles might hope for the security of the Spanish possessions in Italy, for willing aid against heresy in Germany, for zeal in the reform of the Catholic Church, for a generous percentage on the revenues of the Spanish clergy. The years from 1533 to 1541 form perhaps the most essentially Spanish period of Charles's reign. In nothing was he more in harmony with his Spanish subjects than in the burning desire to check the advance of INIahommedan power in the western Mediterranean. This was no mere Quixotism. The very existence of Spain, Sicily and Naples seemed at stake. The enemies were no longer the unwieldy Moorish kingdoms, always liable to disruption from internal faction or the attack of less civilised African fanatics. The foe was now the pirate state of Algiers ruled by Barbarossa. This corsair and his elder brother, natives of Lesbos, were pirates from early youth. The elder brother, invited by the Arab ruler of Algiers to expel the Spaniards from Penon, killed his host and usurped his state. Wiser than the Spaniards he attempted to create a territorial kingdom by the conquest of Tlemcen. He was, however, beaten and killed by the Moors and the Spanish garrison of Oran (15 18). The younger brother Kheir-ed-Din, nicknamed Barbarossa, reduced to the possession of Algiers, put himself under the 68 Spain. suzerainty of the Porte, and became the first of the Turkish Beglierbegs of North Africa, carrying the Crescent to the Straits. Janissaries were sent to his aid ; he could buy at will the fighting population of Anatolia. Algiers became the Alsatia for adventurers, refugees and renegades from the whole of Southern Europe. Barbarossa's chief reliance was on a corps of renegades, while he had a body-guard of Spaniards. His troops were recruited also from the captives chained to the galleys, many of whom abjured their faith to gain wealth and freedom in the corsair's service. To these were added the most adventurous of the Moors expelled or voluntarily migrating from southern Spain, full of traditional hatred of the Spaniards, and accustomed to their methods of warfare. Thus the Spaniards had to fight, not with swarms of undisciplined Moors, but with troops of as good material as their own, and as highly trained. The corsair ships were in point of con- struction the finest in Europe, and their captains among the best seamen. Barbarossa also and several of his successors became admirals of the Turkish fleet, which was thus added to the squadrons of North Africa. The government of Charles fully realised the danger of this union of Barbarossa and the Turks. The African experiences of the reign had not been fortunate. Hugo de Moncada's attack on Algiers had ended in capitulation, massacre and headlong flight (15 19). The capture of Rhodes by the Turks in 1522 might seem, indeed, of not unmixed disadvantage to Spain, for Charles had settled the expelled Hospitallers at Tripoli and Malta, thus drawing a bolt between the western and eastern Mediterranean. But the Algerian corsair was fully a match for the Hospitallers and the Spaniards. He created a territorial kingdom, taking Bona and Constantine, and then annihilated the Spanish garrison at Penon (1529). In 1533 he utilised the distracted condition of Tunis to drive the feeble king, Muley Hassan, from tlie throne, and spread his sway far into the interior. The reign of Charles /{!/). 6g The occupation of Tunis was a direct threat to Sicily and Naples ; it was then the key of the western Mediterranean, while it brought the ruler of Algiers into easy communication with the Porte. Thousands of captives were yearly carried off from Spain and Italy ; Morisco emigrants were conveyed by Barbarossa from Granada and Valencia to settlements in North Africa. The Spanish sea-board was becoming a wilderness, while that of Africa was growing in wealth and population. Charles's determination to take Tunis created wild excite- ment. Nobles and artisans, friars and even women crowded to Barcelona to join the fleet. It was a genuine crusade. Doria sailed in with his Genoese galleys, Prince Louis of Portugal brought round from Lisbon his ocean-going caravels. From Genoa and Ostia, from Naples, Sicily and Southern Spain, Italian levies, Spanish veterans and German mercenaries converged upon the rendezvous at Cagliari. The galleys of the Pope and of the Knights of Malta fitly took part in the re- ligious war. Charles, hoisting the Crucifix at his masthead, stood on his deck amid the nobility of the great crusading nation ; the leader, he said, was Christ, and the Emperor His Standard bearer. Goletta, standing on the neck of land which flanks the narrow channel to the lagoon of Tunis, barred the Emperor's pro- gress. After a month's desperate siege Goletta fell (July 1535). A week more and the troops half-dead, as Charles wrote, with heat and thirst struggled through the sand to Tunis. The Moors were beaten outside the walls, the 20,000 Christian captives rose within the city and opened the gates to Charles. At Goletta Barbarossa had lost 80 ships, here and at Tunis hundreds of cannon fell into Spanish hands ; many, it was noticed, were stamped with the fleur-de-lis. It was a really great achievement. The campaign was fought in the full heat of an African summer ; every barrel of biscuits, every butt of water, must be brought by sea from Sicily ; there were no draught animals, the soldiers dragged their guns by hand. 70 Spain. Even now it would be no light task to find six weeks' supply for 30,000 men engaged with an African enemy equally well provided with artillery and munitions. Muley Hassan was restored to Tunis under Spanish suzerainty, ceding to the Emperor Goletta, Bona and Biserta. Charles wished at once to sail for Algiers, but his army had suffered too severely. A little later he meditated a blow at head-quarters ; he longed to head a Crusade, in concert with Venice, against the Porte. This was prevented by the Sultan's alliance with France, and by the inevitable outbreak of a fresh war in Italy. Charles for the first time visited his South- Italian Kingdoms. The pale-faced youth, who used to say little and count for less, was now the hero and the saviour of southern Europe. Francis I had taunted him as a stay-at- home, but the six weeks of an African campaign had eclipsed the two days' fight at Marignano. In November 1535 died Francesco Sforza, and the duchy of Milan reverted to the Emperor. Francis I, in spite of the renunciation made at Madrid and Cambray, at once advanced the claim of his second son, the Duke of Orleans. The cession of Milan to a French prince, whose wife Catherine had claims to the possessions of the Medici, was for Charles impossible; yet refusal made war a certainty. The war, however, did not nominally arise from the demand for Milan, but from the French King's preposterous claims on Savoy. Hitherto the Dukes, closely connected with the French dynasty, had leaned towards France, whose troops had marched at will through Savoyard territory. This privilege was now refused, for Duke Charles III was under the influence of his spirited wife, Beatrice of Portugal, the sister-in-law and ardent admirer of the Emperor. In retaliation French troops occupied Savoy almost without resistance (March 1536), and crossing the Alps took Turin and great part of Piedmont. Charles was still in Italy; it was impossible that he should TJie reign of Charles I ( V). y i overlook this outrage. Instead of attacking the chain of French posts in Piedmont he reverted to his old scheme for the conquest of Provence. He led his army in person across the Var. No French force of consequence met him in the field, but the whole country was devastated by the French King's orders, while the few towns still occupied were too strongly held to make attack possible or prudent. In November Charles was forced to a humiliating retreat ; his army was ruined by disease ; Leyva, the best of his old generals, had succumbed ; the Emperor's Tunisian laurels were shrivelled by the chilling bise of Provence. For two summers more the war dragged on in Piedmont and the Netherlands. F'or the first time the French more than held their own. The truce for the Netherlands which internal discontent forced the Regent to conclude in 1537 made the Emperor's position in Milan the more critical, for the whole French army could be thrown on Lombardy. The Pope earnestly intervened in favour of a general peace. For this Charles and Francis were too obstinate, but through Papal mediation a ten years' truce was signed at Nice (June 1538). By this truce the hold of Spain upon Italy was seriously weakened. The Emperor, indeed, retained Milan, and his troops garrisoned one-third of Piedmont. The attempt of Filippo Strozzi and the Florentine exiles upon the newly appointed Duke Cosimo had ended in discomfiture. But the French now commanded the passes of the Alps and were firmly settled on the upper Po. They held, moreover, the protectorate of the little state of Mirandola, which became the focus of intrigue against Spanish influence, the sanctuary for exiles from Naples, Milan, Florence and Siena. During the negotiations at Nice Emperor and King, though staying within a league of each other, had refused to meet. Immediately afterwards the world was astonished by their enthusiastic interview at Aigues-Mortes. All old 72 Spain. grievances seemed to be forgotten. Definite shape was given to a project, long in the air, for settling Milan upon a French prince and a Hapsburg princess. Charles had previously professed himself willing to grant the Duchy to the King's third son, while refusing it to Henry of Orleans, the husband of Catherine de' Medici. By his elder brother's death Henry had become Dauphin, and negotiations were rendered easier ; but this creation of a buffer Valois-Hapsburg state was not destined to be reahsed. During the fit of friendship with Francis Charles had obtained leave to pass through France to punish his town of Ghent, which for reasons professedly financial, but partly religious, had rebelled against the Regent. After crushing Ghent Charles changed his mind with regard to Milan. He now proposed to marry his brother's daughter to the French prince, and to create for them a kingdom of the Netherlands and Franche Comte. In compensation Francis was required to resign all Italian claims, and to evacuate Savoyard territory. Nor was this all ; Charles would settle for ever the question of Navarre by marrying the little heiress to his son Philip, while the French King should purchase the possessions of the house which lay northwards of the Pyrenees. These were statesmanlike proposals, and, had they taken effect, might have saved Spain immeasurable calamities. She was strong enough to hold Italy, but not to hold both Italy and the Netherlands, and to assume all liabilities of war along the Franco-German frontier from Alps to Channel. But Francis could never forget his dream of Lombardy, the scene of his first great triumph and his subsequent disgrace. He taxed Charles with perfidy, and the delicate thread of amity was snapped. Francis ostentatiously married the heiress of Navarre to the Duke of Cleves, who had occupied Guelders, although this, under a convention with the deceased Duke, had reverted to the Emperor. Charles replied by formally investing PhiUp with Milan. Meanwhile, as in 1535, there was a lull before The reign of CJtarles I ( V). y^, the storm ; this Charles employed in the attempt to break Barbarossa's power in his own Algerian stronghold. The capture of Tunis had ended in disappointment. Barbarossa was so little humbled that three months later he raided the Balearic Isles, and carried off the population of Port Mahon, including 5000 of the captives released at Tunis. Since then in French alliance he had scoured the coasts of Naples. A joint Spanish-Venetian expedition to the Adriatic foreshadowed the greater campaign of Lepanto. At Prevesa Barbarossa might have been crushed by Doria but for the time-dishonoured rivalry between " the two eyes of Italy," Genoa and Venice. The only result was the annihilation of the considerable Spanish garrison left in Castelnovo. Time was ripe for a decisive blow against Barbarossa, but it was also overripe. Against the advice of admirals and generals Charles insisted on attacking Algiers late in the autumn of 1541. Yet failure seemed impossible. Barbarossa was absent ; Algiers was weakly held by some 800 Turks and 5000 half-trained Moors and renegades. Charles's regular troops numbered at least 22,000 Spaniards, Germans and Itahans. The fleet of 200 ships was commanded by Andrea Doria. With Charles sailed all his most distinguished warriors, Cortes, Alba, Santa Cruz, the younger Frundsberg, Ferrante Gonzaga. No sooner had the troops landed than disaster befell them. A phenomenal equinoctial gale blew down the tents, destroyed stores and ammunition, and finally drove the ships from their moorings to seek shelter to eastward. The garrison of Algiers, ably led, had a light task in completing the discomfiture of troops whose morale was already ruined. But for Charles's imperturbable courage on the retreat to rejoin the ships scarcely a man would have escaped. The very disaster made his reputation as a cool, seasoned soldier; it gave him probably his passion for fight. The great armada was yet further shattered by a recrudescence of the storm. All hope of success against the infidel was over for the reign of Charles. 74 Spain. Barbarossa died in 1546, but his son Hassan, the AnatoHan Dragut, and the Jew Sinan successfully championed the Crescent against the Cross. The misfortunes of Christianity were the opportunity of France. The murder of the French agents, Rincon and Fregoso, who were passing through Lombardy to the Porte, was attributed to the Marquis del Guasto, governor of Milan (May 1 541). When six months later Charles's power seemed shattered at Algiers this murder served as a useful pretext for hostilities. War was declared in 1542. The French every- where prepared to take the offensive. Yet in this last struggle between the two rivals Charles once more asserted his superiority. The Duke of Alba, inimitable in defensive war- fare, drove the Valois from the walls of Perpignan. In June 1543 Charles left Spain for Italy, and journeying thence to Speyer threw himself on the generosity or credulity of the Diet. German aid enabled him to crush the Duke of Cleves and to annex Guelders before Francis moved a man to save his most valuable ally. The Turkish fleet, after ravaging the Italian coasts, joined the French admiral in an attack on Nice, the last refuge of the luckless Duke of Savoy, and wintered in the friendly French harbour of Toulon. Yet the combined fleets met with no marked success, and the cry of Christendom rose loud against the hideous coalition. In Italy alone the French arms triumphed. At Cerisola, a Spanish general, Del Guasto, for once lost his head ; the French lances under the Due d'Enghien at length broke the Spanish foot. The exiles at Mirandola prepared to stir the embers of discontent throughout all Italy. But d'Enghien could not move from lack of funds ; the exiles marching to his aid found Spanish garrisons always in their front. Francis must for once neglect Italy for France, for every man was needed for her defence. The King of England and the Emperor were both upon her soil. The hostility between Charles and Henry had long been a The reign of Charles 1 ( V). 75 diminishing quantity. The fall of Wolsey, of Anne Boleyn, of Cromwell had satisfied any desire that Charles might have for vengeance. Catherine's death relieved him from his chivalrous obligations. Even before this he had urged his envoy to uphold her cause with non-militant discretion ; he had been very cau- tious in pressing the claims of Mary. The English ministers he had long won; Henry's personal rancour had alone delayed an understanding. The old reasons for the Anglo-Spanish-Bur- gundian alliance still subsisted ; it was an added gain if Henry could be withdrawn from a Franco-Lutheran combination. Thus in 1543 an alliance actually came to pass, and in 1544 Henry VHI appeared before Boulogne, while Charles, invading France in person, spread terror to the very walls of Paris. Of a sudden peace was made at Crespy (Sept. 1544) in the full flood of Charles's fortune. The fall of Boulogne decided Francis, but the Emperor's motives are less certain. He was doubtless already influenced by his desire to settle the religious question in Germany. But his military position was by no means strong. Time had been lost upon a paltry siege ; Henry VHI preferred conquest to cooperation. Hitherto Charles had relied upon composite armies; Spaniards and Italians, he would say, were the arms and legs of a corps d'arvice, and Germans the stomach. He had with him few Spaniards or Italians ; his troops were mainly German, of bad quality. Germans rarely fought without their pay, and Charles had little pay to give. A week's haggling or a day's mutiny might have placed him at his rival's mercy. On the stage of Crespy the old play was once more acted with trifling variations in the lines. Charles engaged to give to the Dauphin's brother either his niece with the Netherlands or Franche Comte, or his daughter with the Duchy of Milan ; within four months he must make the choice. The death of the French prince saved him from the wearisome alternative. There is little evidence that Charles had hitherto determined to incorporate Milan with the Spanish dominions ; henceforth y^ Spain. he seemed resolved to concentrate every inch of territory in the hands of PhiUp. During the reign of Charles Spain spent most of her energy abroad ; her domestic history is almost lost to view. In this, indeed, the defeat of the Communes at Villalar was the last striking event. The interest hereafter was mainly constitu- tional and economic. The nobles by their victory had expected to regain authority both with court and country. Before Charles's return they had clamoured for the confiscation of tht rebels' goods or for compensation from the Crown. Charles was warned by his one noble co7ifidant, the Marquis of Denia, to bring foreign troops. By so doing he secured his indepen- dence. Moreover nobles and communes still sullenly watched each other; in the defeated towns Charles might easily find defence against oligarchical pretensions. The consideration of the Crown, if not its popularity, was increased by the introduc- tion of the more elaborate household, the more stilted ceremonial of the Burgundian Court. The expenses of the household, especially those of the table, were quadruple those of the Catholic kings. In this expenditure the Crown found its gain. Of the eight Councillors of State only two were Spaniards, but the presence of loo Spanish gentlemen at Court, each with his attendant suite, implied the formation of a royal party. Charles, after his return, frankly stated that Castile must be for Castilians : he did not repeat his error in granting the greater benefices to aliens. Yet he slowly learnt to be a Spaniard. As late as 1525 we read of mutual dislike between King and people. His manners were not young enough to make him popular. He was reserved and grave, untiring in public business, patient in listening, prudent in reply. His pleasures were few, he hunted a little, but was not inclined to women and other such frivolities. As compared with his predecessors he was thought stingy ; extravagant as was his court, his The reign of Charles I ( F). T] personal habits, apart from his abnormal appetite, were unduly simple. Those who relied on the cast-ofif clothes of royalty were often unfashionably shabby. Yet as a ruler he had two virtues essentially Castilian; he had inherited his grandmother's high standard of justice and her fervent piety. In 1526 Charles at length yielded to his subjects' wishes; he abandoned the idea of an English bride, and married his Portuguese cousin, Isabella, whose dowry was as attractive as her person. Marriages made for prudential reasons have a high average of happiness, and that of Charles increased this average. King and Queen were tenderly devoted to each other, and the Iberian union increased his popularity. Marriage, moreover, induced Charles to travel. As yet there was no capital in Spain, though Valladolid was the more usual residence of the Court. Castilians complained that Charles had seen so little of his kingdom. Now, with his bride, he made a progress through Andalusia and Granada. The old Moorish capital appealed to the artistic side of his nature, and here by the side of the Alhambra he began to build a re- naissance palace, which still remains unfinished. The funds were drawn from a peculiar source ; the Moors bought them- selves free from the extreme rigours of the Inquisition. It was very rarely that Charles sold his soul, though more than once for diplomatic reasons he delayed or endangered its salvation. In striking contrast to Charles's concession to the Moors of Granada was his extreme and personal severity towards those of Valencia. These latter had bravely defended their masters in the hour of peril ; they had been forced to baptism by revolutionists since conquered and proscribed. They naturally reverted to their former faith and customs. The Inquisition held that they were renegades, and Charles upheld the In- quisition. All the experts, the Council of Aragon, the Cortes of Valencia pleaded for leniency, and urged the difficulties of compulsion. Charles replied that all great deeds were difficult. Threats of enforced baptism and exile drove the more spirited 78 Spain. peasants into the Sierra. Hence they repeatedly drove back the local and royal forces, and were only in 1526 beaten by the German lanzknechts whom Charles had brought to Spain. It is possible that the difficulties of this savage little war con- tributed to the compromise with the Moriscos of Granada. The decimation of the Valencian peasantry completed the ruin of their landlords. The industrious East and South of Spain have paid dearly for the extravagant orthodoxy of the central provinces. The decline of constitutional liberties in Castile is often dated from the defeat of Villalar. It is forgotten that the Catholic Kings had arbitrarily used or dispensed with their Cortes, and that during its revolt the third estate was laying claims to powers which it never had possessed. It is forgotten also that under Charles the influence of Cortes was still real and often freely exercised. The defeat of the Communes had little obvious effect on the relations of Crown and Cortes. Even in 1523 the deputies were peculiarly enterprising, insist- ing four times upon redress before supply, resenting the presence of the Chancellor at their debates, and the King's prescription as to the form which the instructions from their constituencies should take. Charles had a high sense of law and precedent, he would suffer no prejudice to the prerogative of the Crown. He therefore resisted the demand for the priority of redress, while the deputies themselves admitted that the limitation of their powers was by custom within his com- petence. The presence of the Chancellor at the debates was an innovation which was not repeated. Charles showed respect for the traditional rights of the Cortes. His necessities, moreover, forced him to summon them with regularity ; they met on the average every three years throughout the reign. However objectionable were his methods of raising money he never levied fresh taxes without consent. In one respect he conceded an innovation which should have proved a valuable constitutional safeguard, for he TJie reign of Charles I ( V). 79 instituted, on petition, a standing committee drawn by lot from the deputies and resembling that of Aragon (1525). The function of this was to watch over the performance of promises made during the session. On two memorable occasions Charles submitted to a defeat. At the crisis of the war with Clement VII (1527) he called upon nobles and clergy for a patriotic grant. The nobles stood absolutely on their right of exemption ; the clergy more delicately declined, and Charles must needs dismiss the Commons without obtaining supply. In 1528, it is true, the towns proved more liberal, and at the Emperor's urgent demand they granted a subsidy for the war witli France. Yet the memory of old parliamentary rights was still fresh. The deputies clamoured aloud for reform, as their predecessors had done on every occasion since the accession of Charles. No less than one hundred and sixty-six separate reforms were demanded. The old grievances of the inordinate aggregation of land in the hands of the clergy, and of its being tied up in perpetual settlement by the nobles, were aired once more with the same want of success as previously ; the reform of the administration was urged, as were measures for increasing the trade with England and France, for avoiding the unjust pressure of taxation upon industry, for improving the food supply of the country, for the suppression of extrava- gance in dress, and many others. But the most important recommendation, as marking a change in public opinion since the Cortes of Toledo in 1525, was that a general amnesty should be granted to the Communeros. Perhaps the Cortes saw already indications of the dry-rot which had entered into the parliamentary institutions which it was their duty to uphold. In any case this recommendation, like many others, was politely shelved by the sovereign'. Ten years passed and the Commons again proved restive. The Cortes of 1538 are very memorable. At a moment of great national danger nobles and clergy were once more sum- 1 For this paragiapli I am indebted to Major Martin Hume. — K. A. 8o Spain. moned. They were begged to assent to a sisa, an indirect tax on meat, which would affect all classes and thus produce a common interest between the three estates. Charles offered in return to place much of the financial administration under parliamentary control. The nobles desired a consultation with the Commons, but this, as contrary to precedent, Charles refused. They then again insisted on their privilege of exemp- tion, and were angrily dismissed to their homes or to wherever they might be pleased to go. Even the Commons stoutly resisted the sisa, and only on the pledge that the subject should never again be raised was the usual subsidy granted. Henceforth the nobles were not summoned to the Cortes. The importance of this has been much exaggerated. The presence of the nobles had been exceptional, and had in no sense added to the strength of the Commons. Had they, indeed, accepted the liability for taxation the result might have been very different, but refusal was a foregone conclusion. Thus the Cortes had so far held their own. Nevertheless it is true that in the reign of Charles their character began to deteriorate, and this was undoubtedly due in part to the defeat of the Communeros. It was not merely that possible progress received a final check, for in national life there can be no complete standstill. The fruits of Villalar were reaped neither by the victorious nobles nor by the vanquished democracy, but partly by the impassive Crown and partly by the lesser gentry, whose action, as a class, had been ambiguous. The latter seized the opportunity yet further to monopolise the municipal offices, and therefore indirectly the representation in the Cortes. The Moorish wars no longer gave employment, and the gentry could not trade ; they therefore sought a liveli- hood in town service. Curiously enough this representation by official gentry prevailed at the moment when the towns reached the fulness of their prosperity, when trade became the chief interest and deserved the most ample representation in the national Council. The Cortes of 1538 proved how TJie reign of Charles 1 ( V). 8 1 inadequate this was. The refusal of the sisa implied that extra- ordinary taxation would continue to be direct, and would fall exclusively on the non-noble classes, whereas the representa- tives themselves were exempt from liability. In this municipal change there were several stages. The gentry first petitioned for admission to office in towns where they were hitherto disqualified. They then claimed a fixed proportion of offices, and finally demanded the exclusion of plebeians. While the members did not adequately represent their towns, the privileged towns less and less effectively represented the country. Even in 1520 Galicia had com- plained that the province had its mouthpiece in Zamora, a town outside its borders. Any extension of representation was opposed purely by the privileged towns. They resisted all requests for the admission of fresh constituencies on the plea of monopoly and privilege. Thus it is probable that the Cortes had no firm hold upon public opinion. The govern- ment, moreover, increased its influence over the towns through the corregidores, who, in spite of frequent petitions, were now appointed for all towns and for long terms. The pushing, active classes, occupied in feverish, commercial progress, seemed to ignore their political decadence. It is difficult to resist the conclusion that the perpetual and ineft'ectual repetition of the same demands in Cortes was a mere sedative to popular discontent. They were seldom seriously pressed : they became, as so much in Spain, meaning- less but solemn forms. The deputies urged the grievances of their constituents until their personal wants were satisfied. Thus the system of gratifications, by no means introduced by Charles, became under him or later an engine of corruption. The right of rejecting petitions had long been exercised, but Charles could venture to disdain the courteous formulas which hitherto had decently veiled refusal. Castile had, as England in the eighteenth century, outgrown her constitutional machinery. H. s. 6 82 Spain. Under Charles the system of administrative councils was yet further developed. A more definite form was given to the Council of State, which seemed likely to become the highest consultative body, dealing with alliances, with peace and war, with appointments to embassies, viceroyalties and commands- in-chief. But there was still no fixed number and few official members ; it consisted of men of experience from all the Emperor's dominions, who had risen to the top in Church and State. This Council was, perhaps, mainly of importance as entailing the growth of the Secretariate, though under Charles a single Secretary, Gonzalo Perez, performed all its functions. The trade of the Indies was already entirely regulated by the powerful Casa de Contratacion. But to Charles was due the Council of the Indies, which embraced every department of civil or ecclesiastical administration in the colonies (1524 and 1529). From the Council of Castile was detached a delegacy, termed the Council of the Chamber, for the bestowal of royal patronage. Finally in 1555 the Council of Italy was apparently separated from that of Aragon, while the same year witnessed the estabhshment of the Council of Flanders. Charles had carefully watched the Castilian nobles; he gave them little effective power, but high and profitable appointments in his dominions; he treated them with honour and considera- tion. This is characteristic of his policy ; he had early learnt his lesson, and vvas resolved not to risk a conflict with any section of his Castilian subjects. With Aragon he was somewhat less scrupulous. Contemporaries state that he tried to extort from the Cortes a surrender of national privileges, and that he begged the Pope to release him from his oath to maintain them. Once at least he committed a breach of the cherished privilege of matiifestacmi by denying the right of a defendant to place himself under the justiciars protection pending trial. In Castile he had retained a tight hold upon his clergy, yet after 1522 he kept it, with few exceptions, exclusively national. In Aragon he conferred two important sees upon Italian The reign of Charles 1 ( F). 83 adherents. Yet even here, when pressed by the Cortes, he drew back and respected national prejudice and interest. In Spain Charles never pushed his absolutism to conclusions after his first lesson, and this is no small credit in a character by nature obstinate. If constitutional independence dwindled, material pro- sperity advanced throughout the reign of Charles. On his accession the land was still mainly agricultural or rather pastoral. Silk manufacture was active among the Moors of the South, and there were cloth factories of repute in Central Spain. But the lower classes generally still lived on the produce of their homesteads, or on the wages of labour or service ; the middle and upper classes on rents, salaries and the interest of the state debt. The sudden demand from the Indies changed all this. The settlers were not numerous, but they made their money easily, and would not labour to supply their needs. Whatever they wanted they must have, and at whatever price. European produce was also foisted by the colonial governments upon the natives, with or without their will. To supply these needs Spain had the exclusive right. Her agriculture and her manufacture must therefore alike be modified to meet an entirely new demand. Thus it fell about that Spain became for a short space -a manufacturing country. The very district which had been the scene of the rising of the Communes reached within a quarter of a century after their defeat the zenith of its prosperity. Medina del Campo, a phoenix from the flames, became the mart of the woollen trade, its fairs were the centre of the system of credit and exchange. Toledo, Segovia, Valladolid became busy manufacturing towns. Spanish life was being profoundly altered. There was a rush from the country to the towns, where wages were rising by leaps and bounds. The manufacturing hands in Toledo were quintupled between 1525 and 1550; in some towns beggars and vagabonds were forced into the factories. The cloth trade spread southward to 6—2 84 Spain. Granada ; the silk manufacture spread northwards to Seville and thence to Toledo. We find the young Mary, Queen of Scots, receiving a gift of blue and red silk stockings from Valencia, as being of the finest quality in the world. A sure sign of the growth of manufacture was the differentiation of function. The small master-clothworker gave place to the capitalist manufacturer who employed some hundreds of hands, while the middleman undertook the shipment and distribution. Charles himself was deeply interested in the American trade: he believed it capable of indefinite expansion. The fluctuations in agriculture were little less than those in trade. Hitherto tillage had been completely subordinate to pasture, but for the rest of the century there was a struggle between the two industries. The situation was the reverse of that in England. There sheep-farming was the modern en- croaching element, and English conservatism called upon the legislature to check it. In Castile arable enclosures began to spread at the expense of the great sheep-rearing corporation, the mesta, and the more conservative bodies, the Cortes and the Council of Castile, were disposed to regard this as a breach of vested interests. The viesia hitherto had been all-powerful. It was a vast union, with its representative administration, its courts, its common chest. It forbade competition among its brethren, and so beat down the rents of pasture; it boycotted any landowner who dared to evict a member. Between the winter pastures in the sunny plains of Estremadura and the summer feeding grounds in the highlands of Castile lay a broad waste track over which no plough could pass. The Crown encouraged the mesta because its revenues depended on the tolls; the people tolerated it because the rents, though low, were certain and gave no trouble. And after all wool was Spain's most profitable product. The colonial trade introduced a rapid change. The colonists cared only for gold ; they would not till the soil. They drank largely, yet, except on the Pacific coast, they were The reign of Charles I ( V). 85 forbidden to plant vines. Hence Spain must supply her colonies, and the area of wheat, vines and olives annually increased. Charles encouraged this tendency; his Ebro canal provided large stretches of Aragon with irrigation. A law was even passed forbidding the conversion of arable land into pasture. The Government raised the maxhmim price of grain ; this encouraged the proprietors to sow and placed them in direct opposition to the mesia. In the South the agricultural interest split within itself, the growers of corn protesting ngainst the extension of vineyards, which took bread from the poor. Once more, however, national traditions got the upper hand. The colonists had not acclimatised sheep, they re- garded cotton clothing as degrading, and hence an increased demand for woollens. The pendulum swung back, and not only was fresh enclosure forbidden, but it was ordered that broken pasture belonging to the Crown, the Church and cor- porations must again revert to pasture (1552). Yet at the close of the reign agriculture was generally thriving ; flax had been introduced, and the import of linen forbidden, to en courage the new industry. Notwithstanding these roseate prospects the condition of trade and agriculture was not quite wholesome. The Cortes were in absolute ignorance of economic laws ; they regarded it as the one function of government to protect the interest of the consumer, especially of the upper middle class consumers, who alone were represented in the Cortes. This was the mean- ing of the severe restrictions placed on native cloths to ensure quality and prevent fraud, of the governmental maximum fixed on the chief necessaries of life, of the so-called monopolies which, in order to eliminate the middleman, gave to individual producers the sole right of selling. Municipal granaries stored grain against bad seasons, and by their rights of preemption and of fixing prices were formidable competitors to private growers. The practical inconveniences arising from the want of currency, of horses, mules, leather, olive oil, breadstuffs, 86 Spain. were met by frequent laws prohibiting export. Spain was anything but a protective country, in spite of occasional pro- tective regulations. In the interest of the consumer she encouraged imports. Her chronic difficulty was that she desired to buy without a corresponding willingness either to sell or to pay. Prices throughout Europe were rising rapidly, and in Spain even faster than elsewhere. Foreigners attributed this to the indolence of the Castilian workman, who measured his wage by the disinclination with which he did his work. It was partly no doubt due to the inpour of precious metals, although the rise preceded any appreciable output from the Indies. In contradiction to this rise of prices there was throughout Spain generally an undoubted lack of currency. This was ascribed to the greed of Charles's Flemish suite upon his first visit to Spain. The superior purity of Spanish coinage undoubtedly encouraged its surreptitious export, but the main cause of the inconvenience was probably the backwardness of communica- tions. Currency was badly distributed; it did not find its way beyond the great commercial centres, and, as commerce was much in the hands of foreigners, ultimately in spite of pro- hibition oozed away from Spain. This rise of prices accompanied by a lack of currency horrified the Cortes, the official representatives of the con- sumer. They were in entire ignorance of the causes, and endeavoured to counteract the evil by a series of contradictory experiments which hampered both commerce and agriculture, and was ultimately destined to ruin both. At one moment they would forbid the export of breadstufts, and force the price of wheat to its former level, regardless of the doubled cost of production. At another they strove to prohibit altogether the export of cloth, silk, leather and iron to the Indies, in order to compel the colonists to manufacture, and so, by stopping the drain upon the home supply, lower its cost for the home con- sumer. Yet again in the consumer's interest they opened the The reign of Cliarles /(F). 87 flood-gates to foreign imports manufactured at a far cheaper price than the rate of wages and produce in Spain could allow. There were of course real difficulties. Nations, as indi- viduals, have their opportunities too early or too late. Spain found her market before she was ready to supply it. Not only was she embarrassed by the feverish activity of the colonial trade, but her own gentry brought into contact with the wider European world learnt higher standards of comfort and luxury, and all other classes must imitate the gentry. Hence the supply never caught up the demand in a country where origin- ally there was little capital and no habits of industry, and hence again the introduction of foreign capitalists who financed Spain at a ruinous rate of interest, and the competition of cheaper foreign goods. A dislike for foreigners was common to all countries, but in Spain it was carried farther than elsewhere. Yet Spain, if she was to be equal to her new position, above all nations needed foreign aid. The Spaniard could conquer and keep down a huge subject population, but he had not the practical faculties necessary for trade and financial administration. Lacking the business talent himself he despised and hated it in others. The restrictions on foreigners were due not to Crown but to people. Ferdinand and Isabella had encouraged German, French and Italian colonies in Spain, although the people grumbled. When after Isabella's death the Cortes proposed to exclude foreigners from dealing in the necessaries of life and from municipal office, and to limit their residence to a year, Ferdinand frankly asserted that Spain could not do without them. Charles was for a time forced to yield to his subjects' wishes, but before long all the taxes were in the hands of Genoese, while the Augsburg house of Fugger farmed the revenues of the military orders and the mines of Almaden and Guadalcanal. The Cortes complained (1528) that the Genoese bankers had the monopoly of capital, that the trade in wool, silk, iron, steel, soap and all necessaries of life was in their 88 Spain. hands. For centuries the harvest in Spain was reaped by Provencals and Auvergnats, who spent nothing and carried their wages back to France. The American trade was at first confined to CastiHans. Ferdinand admitted Aragonese, and Charles would gladly have opened it to all his subjects' ports. The German house of Welser did indeed contract for the colonisation of Venezuela, and the Fuggers for that of Chili and for the spice trade with the Moluccas. But Charles was beaten ; the monopoly of Spain and especially of Castile was too strong for him. When he established the staple of the spice trade at Corunna the Seville merchants angrily protested. In 1529 Charles sold the doubtful Spanish claims to the Moluccas to his Portuguese rivals, and henceforth Seville reigned supreme. Her monopoly in early days was natural ; Cadiz had similarly been the sole port for the Barbary trade. The seas swarmed with pirates, and the American ships must needs sail in company; the collection of duties was facilitated ; the character of ships and crews and emigrants could be more closely watched. The trade was highly organised by the Casa de Cotitraiacmi, a Board of Trade with judicial powers, which regulated the number of ships and the bulk and value of their freights, received and distributed the precious metals and the merchan- dise from the Indies. All lines of traffic within Spain con- verged on Seville. Cadiz also throve because the bigger ships must anchor in her harbour. Hence sailed the galleons with their convoy for Porto Bello to supply Peru and Chili, and the Jlota which made for San Domingo and Vera Cruz. On the return journey the two squadrons joined company and arrived together. The privileged position of Seville and Cadiz drew all life from other Spanish ports ; the monopoly was to become intolerable to Spain herself, to her colonies, to all Europe ; the rigorous restrictions ultimately defeated their own object, and the bonds were burst by the growing maritime powers with the connivance of the colonists. The reign of Charles I ( V). 89 The Cortes, meanwhile, attributed the growing financial difficulties to the increase of taxation. This was of course mainly due to the recurring wars with France, but partly to the increased charges caused by the rise in prices. Con- temporaries noticed that Charles was ever at his wits' end for money. Gold and silver began to flow in from the Indies, the extraordinary subsidy became regular and normal, and yet the deficiency grew apace. The dowry brought by the Portuguese infanta, the ransom for the French King's sons, the sum paid by Portugal for the monopoly of the Molucca trade, huge advances from German and Genoese bankers, were all poured into the bottomless vessel of a Danaid. Charles even resorted to the extreme measure of seizing the whole of the gold and silver brought by one of the American fleets, promising interest to the rightful owners until repayment. Nothing served to fill the void, and the King left behind him a huge debt of 20,000,000 ducats. The economic errors of the Cortes and the fiscal oppression of the Crown were thus already present in the reign of Charles, and each succeeding reign exaggerated these evils. Had the manufacturing industry been fostered a prosperous future would have been in store for Spain, as her market was an exclusive one. But through a series of centuries every economic heresy, every wrong-headed experiment, every foolish nostrum was allowed to work its worst upon the national industries until they were ultimately strangled. The problem which constantly faced the successive Cortes was still the scarcity of currency accompanied by the continual rise of the prices of commodities ; and tlie remedies, vainly repeated, were usually the restriction of the export of the latter, together with measures for the suppression of luxury in dress, princi- pally against the use of bullion '. The constant drain of men ^ A fult treatment of the subject of Spanish sumptuary laws will be found in an Essay in Major Martin's Hume's volume, The Year after tlie Armada. E. A. 90 Spain. for the wars and by emigration rendered skilled labour in- creasingly dear, whilst the unwise fiscal arrangements which threw the greater burden of taxation upon industry, and hampered production by the arbitrary fixing of maximum prices in the supposed interest of the consumer, rendered the Spanish manufacturers of the more costly goods unable to compete with the foreigner ; so that of the vast sums of money that came yearly from the Indies a large portion never got beyond Seville, where it was paid away to foreign merchants, in exchange for goods, for export thence to the Indies. Thus it came about that gradually the national industries were crushed, whilst the country was drained of its resources '. Spanish power had not been wholly occupied by attempts at expansion to the East and South. In Continental America the reign of Charles was the age of discovery, conquest, and settlement. Cortes conquered Mexico, and Pizarro Peru. Other leaders established themselves in Central America. Soto led his ill-fated expedition to the Mississippi valley. The contrast between the governmental settlements in Africa and those of the adventurers in America is very striking. The latter did not cling to isolated seaports which were held or lost at huge expense. They secured enormous territories in spite of resistance sometimes desperate and of civil war yet more dangerous. Even the original conquest is less marvellous than the imposition for all time of Spanish faults and virtues, language and religion on vast masses of hostile popu- lation. In Charles's reign these conquests affected the mother- country directly in two ways, by the drain of population and by the inflow of precious metals. To the latter brief reference has been made. The effect on population is very uncertain, for evidence is conflicting. Some writers speak of severe restric- tions placed on emigration, others ascribe the lack of recruits in Spain to the exodus of every able-bodied man to America; ' [ .am indebted for the last paragraph to Major Marthi Hume. E. A, The reign of CJiarles I ( V). 91 a Venetian envoy describes Seville as being depopulated by emigration. Soto on his Mississippi expedition took 600 men from Spain. Usually, however, the conquerors levied their men in Cuba, but how far these were recent emigrants or older settlers it is difficult to decide. The control which the home government asserted over the adventurers is very remarkable. Charles supported Cortes against his calumniators and covered him with honours, but he refused to combine the administrative with the military power, and created a Viceroyalty for Mexico with its Aitdiencia on the Spanish model. He was probably not sorry to see Cortes ruin himself with abortive expeditions towards the North-West, and allowed him to die in poverty. In Peru the danger was far greater. The first attempt to establish home control ended in total failure ; Peru was within an ace of becoming an independent state, an example which the other colonies would speedily have followed. But Charles persisted, and Pizarro's house was crushed. The result of the reign was the establishment of the military, religious and judicial machinery which existed until the independence of the colonies, and in some respects survived it. The intermittent war between Charles and Francis had closed with the peace of Crespy, and from this begins the last stage of the Emperor's career. Henceforth his activity is directed, to outward appearance, from the interests of Spain to those of Germany. It was at last possible to deal vigorously with religious revolt. The hands of Charles were freed by the shattered health of Francis, and by the Sultan's truce with Ferdinand. Pope and Emperor combined, not as of old for territorial Italian purposes, but for the restoration of Germany to the Church. The earnest of the league was the assembly of the long-deferred Council at Trent (1545). In the follow- ing year Charles took the field against the Protestant princes. It was the Emperor's fortune to become the gaoler of each 92 Spain. of his chief enemies in turn. As he had captured the King of France and the Pope, so now the victory of Miihlberg entailed the imprisonment of his two inveterate foes, the Elector of Saxony and the Landgrave of Hesse. Paul III, indeed, startled at his early successes, and alarmed at the activity of the Council, had broken from him. Charles went his way regardless. Germany lay still at his feet. By the Interim he imposed upon the vanquished Protestants his own religious system; he humbled the free Imperial towns by war contribu- tions and the establishment of municipal oligarchies ; he bowed the princes to the ground by threats of confiscation. Charles was at length Emperor indeed, he was for a moment at the summit of his power. The captivity of Francis I had led to the League of Cognac ; that of Clement VII to the League of Amiens. The captivity of the Landgrave of Hesse was perhaps the most immediate cause of the treaty of Maurice of Saxony with the new French King. While Henry II seized the three Bishoprics, the military keys of Lorraine, Maurice, aided by the ill-concealed hostility of Catholic German princes and the indifference of Ferdinand, drove Charles headlong from Innsbruck. Then followed a momentary revival. Charles, once in the field, shook off the valetudinarian languor which had given Maurice his opportunity. Surrounded by Spanish and Italian veterans under the command of Alba Charles recovered a hold upon South Germany and laid siege to Metz. As at Algiers, Charles paid dearly for his obstinacy in neglecting the advice of scientific soldiers. As in Africa the etiuinoctial gales, so in Lorraine the rains and snows of winter proved his ruin. The siege of Metz was raised ; in the long wrestle between the two great powers the last fall was in France's favour ; Met \ for more than three centuries was lost to Germany. The defeat by France, the armed and unarmed protest of the German princes against his political and religious system, convinced Charles that he had failed. He left to The reis;n of Charles I ( V). 93 P'erdinand the responsibility for the legal recognition of the parity of the two religions. In these chances and changes of fortune on German soil it is easy to forget that Charles was King of Spain. Philip's reign, indeed, within the Peninsula may be dated from the day when the Emperor left his son as Regent. Yet Charles's German triumphs and failures were vitally connected with his Spanish power and policy. To the last moment he had hesitated to abandon his hopes of religious reunion for religious war ; his final determination was due to the pressure of Pedro de Soto, his Spanish confessor. The Spanish people, while complaining of their King's foreign interests, had long reproached him with his tolerance of German heresy. By Spain, and especially by the Spanish clergy, the sinews of war were supplied. In 1545 the Pope granted to Charles half the ecclesiastical revenues of Spain ; he permitted also a large sale of Church lands. This principle, essentially Spanish, Charles wished afterwards to extend to all his dominions. Under the pretext of overthrowing heresy he would base his power on ecclesiastical property ; he would make the Church throughout his dominions as subservient to the Crown as it was in Spain. This danger in no small degree contributed to the unfriendly neutrality of the German ecclesiastical princes towards Charles, when Maurice entered the lists against him in the name of German liberties. Charles's victory was in great measure won by Spanish troops, led by Alba, the most characteristically Spanish of his generals. After Miihlberg Germany was held down by Spanish garrisons. Short, swarthy Spaniards, swaggering, superstitious and licentious, lorded it in Saxony, in the Palatinate, in Wiirtemberg. Philip of Hesse himself was never by night nor day out of the sight of his Spanish guards. Upon Alba was to be conferred the German principality of Neuburg. Hatred for the Spanish troops alienated all Germany from the Spanish King; here, as later in the Netherlands, this was the more 94 Spain. popular and general cause of the revolt. Above all the victory of Mlihlberg was followed by the definite attempt to foist Phihp upon the Empire. Charles forced Ferdinand and his son Maximilian to consent that Philip should succeed the former. Germany would have become an annex of Spain, even as the Netherlands and Italy. Ferdinand was but little younger than Charles, and Phihp long outlived Maximilian; Germany would therefore have fallen under Spanish domina- tion. The success of Maurice scarcely shook the Emperor's resolve. But the resistance of the German princes, as mani- fested in the League of Heidelberg (1553), or, as Charles himself professed (Feb. 1554), the marriage of Philip with Mary Tudor induced him to abandon his scheme. He frankly surrendered all idea of uniting the Empire to the Spanish Crown, and this restored outward harmony between the two lines of Hapsburg. But the lukewarmness of Ferdinand and the outspoken indignation of Maximilian had contributed to Maurice's success. Germany could not tolerate a Spanish Emperor, and least of all Philip, whom Germans on his recent visit (1548) had learnt to know and hate. Not only in Germany was Charles's later pohcy eminently Spanish. While he fought the Protestants on the Danube and the Elbe, his Spanish ambassadors and bishops fought the Papacy at Trent. Their numerical inferiority was compensated by their superior theological learning, their more genuine zeal for reform, their consolidation as a strong national Church, their subordination to the Emperor. The bishops were admirably led by Diego de Mendoza, the ambassador, a zealous churchman, but a diplomatist of high ability and wide modern learning. Stormy meetings preceded the transference of the Council to Bologna, which the Spaniards, remaining at Trent, refused to recognise. The Italian prelates resented the Emperor's pretensions, the Spaniards clung closely to their Crown. A Conciliar schism seemed inevitable. Charles' scheme of Church reform was equally opposed to The reign of Charles J (V). 95 Lutheran revolt and Papal conservatism. Once again his idea was Spanish. It was a return to the attempts of Spanish theologians, in the first days of the Reformation, to find common ground with Luther, not in doctrine, but in reform of disciplinary abuses. When Charles imposed the Interim upon Germany the victory seemed won for Spanish methods alike against German and Roman. Charles would be head of the Church in Germany as absolutely as he was in Spain. The settlement was peculiarly Spanish in being irrespective of the Papal protest ; it was a revival of the ecclesiastical independence of Ferdinand and Isabella, a foreshadowing of that of Philip. Not only on ecclesiastical questions were Pope and Emperor opposed. The resistance of the Curia to Spanish predominance in Italy was natural enough, but in restless territorial greed the Farnesi surpassed the Medici. Paul Ill's ambitions stimulated those of Charles's Italian governors ; encroachment was forced upon them by the ever-present danger of Papal- French alliance. The Pope must needs found a state for his son and grandsons, be this Parma and Piacenza, or Milan, or Siena. The French King was still tempted by the old lure of Milan and Naples. To compass his desire he must intrigue with sullen nobles and turbulent democracy at Naples, galvanise Guelfic opposition in Lombardy, excite the exiles of Genoa and Florence against Doria and Medici, or hurl Turkish- African squadrons against the coasts of Sicily and Naples. At Naples Don Pedro de Toledo ruled with a tight rein without provoking unnecessary scandal. At Milan the Marquis del Guasto had been succeeded by Ferrante Gonzaga, the personal enemy of the Farnesi (1546). The Pope had coveted the office for his son Pier Luigi or his grandson Ottavio, who had married Charles's bastard daughter, Gonzaga, although an Italian, was an Imperialist of Imperialists ; while Charles was stifling independence in Germany, this cadet of the 96 Spain. ruling house of Mantua outpaced him in Italy. Imperialist plots were hatched in Venetian Lombardy ; a Spanish garrison terrorised Siena ; Charles himself saved Genoa from Gonzaga, who would have overthrown its constitution and bridled it with a fortress. Genoa, indeed, was the doubtful link in the Imperial chain. The exile Fieschi, thanks to a slippery plank, was drowned at the moment of seizing the city with French and Papal aid (1547). Gonzaga parried the thrust by murdering Pier Luigi and occupying his strong town of Piacenza. Paul III re- taliated by affiancing his grandson Orazio to the Dauphin's bastard. A French garrison at Parma faced the Spaniards at Piacenza. Any power which held Parma and Piedmont was believed to control North Italy; Charles could scarcely have retained his hold but for the Pope's death and his grandsons' quarrel. Bastard daughters were useful pawns ; Ottavio's marriage, in spite of his desire for vengeance, forced him back for a time to the ImperiaUst side. Julius III, less noteworthy than any recent Pope, passed fitfully for an Imperial partisan. A Spanish subject, the NeapoUtan Carafifa, succeeded him (1555), but it was left to Philip II to fight Charles's battles o'er again. The reign of Charles in Italy ended in success. Siena had revolted against its Spanish garrison (1552) and admitted a French force. Hence the Florentine exile, Piero Strozzi, could threaten the Imperialist Medici at Florence, and exercise pressure, not unwelcome, upon Rome. Alessandro de' Medici had been murdered by an equally disreputable cousin (1537): Charles conferred the Duchy of Florence upon Cosimo, a member of the younger line. The new Duke would gladly have succeeded also to his predecessor's widow, the Emperor's bastard. In this he was disappointed, but in return for a subsidy for the French War (1543) Charles withdrew the Spanish garrisons which temporarily held Plorence and Leghorn. His confidence met with its reward. Cosimo's forces closed round the old rival. TJie reign of CJiarles I ( V). 97 Siena, and forced the French garrison to capitulate. Thus a large state, wedged between the Florentine and Papal frontiers, was annexed by the Spanish Crown. Early in Philip's reign Siena was ceded to Florence, but as a Spanish fief, and to Spain remained the Sienese seaboard, the so-called State of the Presidi, an invaluable halfway house between Genoa and Naples. Nothing proves more conclusively the predominance of Spanish interests in Charles' policy than his settlement of Italy. The connection of Milan with the EnTpIre was no mere theory. For M axinjilian and the German princes its recovery had ever been tbe i:>anacea for Imperial bankruptcyr^The princes and towns of Northern and Central Italy had been forced to contribute to Charles' necessities on the ground of their relation to the Empire. If in the Italian campaigns the Spanish troops had proved themselves more efficient, the Germans had usually outnumbered them ; the acquisition of Milan had cost more German than Spanish blood. The Imperial vicariate in Italy would naturally fall to the Hapsburg line which succeeded to the Empire. Yet Charles tossed aside all German claims, conferring upon Philip not only Milan and Siena, but the Vicariate with all its vague but dangerous pretensions. This was felt to imply the virtual incorporation of Italy with the Spanish Crown. Charles, whom the Spaniards would gladly have rejected, had learnt to see in Spain the centre of his power. He had abandoned all idea of a buffer-state in Northern Italy, and the old dream of a Burgundian kingdom. The long arms of the Spanish Crown must stretch over Italy and Flanders. Could they not also reach across the British Channel? The reverses of Charles in Germany were not without their compensation. Far more important than the Empire to the ruler of Spain and the Netherlands was the friendship of England. It has been seen that in 1544 Henry VIII invaded France in concert with the Emperor. Even with the Protestant H. s. 7 98 Spain. government of Edward VI Charles had had no hostile relations. When in 1553 Edward died and Charles' cousin Mary was on the throne he determined with all his old fire and energy that she should marry Philip. The Netherlands could then be safely left to a son who was King of England. The old alliance of Spain, Burgundy and England, seemed to be revived, and set upon an infinitely firmer basis ; the new national rivalry between Spain and France should be reinforced by the old traditional hatred between France and England. For this transition Charles' own retirement was to pave the way. His health was now completely broken ; he longed only for the rest to body and mind towards which in his laborious life his eyes had often turned. Germany and Italy saw the Emperor's face no more. The solemn transference of the Empire to Ferdinand in March 1558 completed the cycle of renunciations, but long ere this Charles had retired to Yuste to dispel the gloom of recent years under the bright sky of Estremadura. Out of all his wide dominions he found himself at home in Spain. The Flemish alien had become a Spaniard. SPAIN: ITS GREATNESS AND DECAY. BY MARTIN A. S. HUME. 7—2 CHAPTER I. PHILIP II, 1527— I 55 I. At four o'clock in the afternoon of the 21st May, 1527, Philip of Austria first saw the Hght in Valladohd, the ancient capital of New Castile. An overpowering sense of the great- ness of his coming destiny pervaded the birth of the Emperor's firstborn. His mother had ordered her face to be hidden from the light that no involuntary sign of her pain should be visible whilst the puny infant was being ushered into the world over which it was hoped he would rule in time to come. To the remonstrance of her Portuguese lady attendants who urged her not to suppress the natural expression of her suffer- ings the Empress replied, " No. Die I may : but wail I will not." And not in the gloomy old palace alone was the import- ance of the event impressed upon the minds of men. The ruin which extended empire was to bring upon Spain had not yet proceeded far enough to be recognised by the ordinary citizen, and the pride of Spaniards was flattered by the idea that their monarch wielded sway over the greater part of Christendom, and indefinitely over heathendom beyond. So when the longed-for news came that the heir of his greatness had been born in the heart of Castile, and not in far-away Flanders like his father, gravity and restraint were thrown to the winds and the Spaniards went well-nigh crazy with joy. Throughout Philip's life fate decreed that his brightest hopes should always end in gloom and disappointment; and the I02 Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. circumstances of his birth were no exception to the rule. Suddenly the joy bells that greeted his advent were silenced by the dread news that only a fortnight before (6 May, 1527) the Emperor's troops had sacked Rome. In a moment the re- joicings of Valladolid were turned to mourning. All that the Emperor could do to demonstrate his grief at the event was done ; but the citizens of his capital whispered in awestricken tones to each other that this was a bad augury for the new- born prince. In March of the following year 1528 a special meeting of the Cortes of Castile was summoned at Madrid to swear alle- giance to the infant heir to the crown, and though this time they granted the subsidy demanded of them (200 million maravedis — £fi^il'^^) they did so with a bad grace, and clamoured aloud for reform, as their predecessors had done on every oppor- tunity since the accession of Charles ; but on this occasion, as previously, their recommendations were politely shelved. The education of Philip during the absence of the Emperor from Spain, from August 1529 to May 1533, was confided to the Empress, and to one of her Portuguese ladies, Leonor de Mascarenhas. Even thus early, he was a preternaturally grave and silent child, with a fair pink and white skin and silky yellow hair. From his earliest moments of intelligence he must have heard constantly around him prayers for the success of his father against the wicked heretics. The gloomy etiquette of the Castilian court, the atmosphere of grim devotion which surrounded the Empress, and the ever-recurring suggestion that his father was engaged in a great struggle on the side of the Almighty against the powers of evil, must have struck deeply into the nature of the infant. He was the descendant of a line of religious mystics, some of whom had crossed the border line of insanity, he sprang from the union of first cousins and the curse of epilepsy was in his blood, so that it is not wonderful that the effect of his ancestry and his surroundings were visible in him from his earliest years. On the Emperor's return to I] Philip II, 1527 — 1551. 103 Spain he appointed as his son's tutor, on the recommendation of the Empress, a priestly professor of Salamanca named Juan Martinez Pedernales, or Siliceo. He was a man of small knowledge or energy and let the prince go very much his own way. But Philip was an apt pupil in studies that attracted him. He never was a proficient linguist but could read and write Latin well at a very early age, and understood French and Italian ; whilst for mathematics he appears to have had an extraordinary aptitude. At the age of 12 he lost his mother (i May, 1539). She had borne to the Emperor two other sons who died of epilepsy in their infancy, and Philip remained the sole heir of his father's greatness. Wars and the cares of a vast empire kept Charles away from Spain, except for three short visits, until the end of 1 541. Though still in the prime of life he was already tired of the world, and the morbid mental lethargy which lie in- herited from his mother was dominating the physical vigour of the burly Hapsburgs. He was eager thus early to indoctrinate his son with the system of government of which he was to continue the traditions, and he was delighted to find the boy studious, grave and silent beyond his tender years. During the time the father and son were together the great statesman devoted a portion of every day to initiate his successor in the task before him, and he found Philip ready for the lesson. In the autumn of 1542 the Dauphin with ^^\\ army of 40,000 men overran Rousillon, which then belonged to the crown of Aragon, and besieged Perpignan. The opportunity was considered a favourable one for initiating the young prince in actual warfare, and he accompanied the Duke of Alba to the relief of the fortress ; but he saw no fighting, for at the news of the great reinforcements from Italy and Castile being on their way, Henry of Valois abandoned the siege. But Philip's, journey was not fruitless. The Cortes of Aragon, Valencia and Catalonia were in session at Monzon, and thither the prince went to receive the oath of allegiance from them. Long ago I04 Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. Jaime el Conquistador (1216 — 1275) had crushed the feudal power of the Aragonese nobles, and as usually happened in similar cases, had been obliged to depend largely upon the popular power in doing so. The Cortes of the Aragonese dominions possessed therefore far greater power than the Cas- tilian Cortes and held with rough tenacity to the privileges they enjoyed. More than once Charles had met with resist- ance from them; in 1536, for instance, they had absolutely refused to raise taxes for the Emperor's need except in legally constituted Cortes where grievances could be first formulated. The Catalan deputies now took the oath to Philip as heir to the crown, only on condition that it should not be considered binding until it had been ratified in Barcelona. The oath of allegiance taken by the Aragonese to their kings at best was but a grudging one. "We recognise you as king," it ran, "so long as you uphold our privileges : and if not, not." The whole tendency of the policy of Charles and his successor was to concentrate and unify the national power, and no opportunity was missed of weakening, where possible, the autonomy of the stubborn Aragonese. But, like the English commons, they held the purse-strings and refused to vote supplies except on their own terms. Charles's treasury was chronically empty, for the drain upon it was constant. He was now confronted with a fresh for- midable coalition. On. the side of France against the Emperor was the power of the Turk in the Mediterranean, the Pope (Paul III), and the sympathy, at least, of the Lutheran princes of Germany. On a former occasion when the Emperor was in the midst of his great struggle with France he had re- plenished his war chest with the rich dowry (900,000 crowns) of his Portuguese wife, and he now sought to repeat the operation by marrying his heir to his . cousin the Princess Maria, daughter of John III of Portugal and of Charles' sister Catharine. Some years before Charles had projected the marriage of his son with young Jeanne d'Albret, titular i.J Philip II, 1 527 — 1551. 105 Queen of Navarre, whose ancestors' Spanish kingdom had been usurped by Ferdinand the CathoHc ; but Francis I had discovered and frustrated this dangerous intrigue, which would have brought the Spanish monarch over the Pyrenees as tributary sovereign of a large portion of southern France. Before Philip was wedded to the Portuguese princess his father was obliged to leave Spain for Germany, and encouraged by the precocity in statesmanship displayed by the young prince, he determined to leave in his hands the regency of Spain during his absence. This was one of the most important junctures of Philip's life. He was barely sixteen years old and thus early was entrusted with Charles' secret system of government, which henceforward became his own and swayed most of the actions of his life. The two letters written by the Emperor on his departure, for his son's guidance, are of the utmost importance in providing a key to Philip's subsequent political action. Although the regent was entrusted with the ultimate decision on all points, he was to be guided by the opinion of some of Charles's wisest councillors, especially of Tavara, Archbishop of Toledo and the Secretary of State Francisco de los Cobos. Philip is privately informed that the reason they are appointed is that they are respectively heads of factions, and each one will prevent the regent from falling under the influence of the other. For the benefit of a young lad of sixteen, the Emperor mercilessly lays bare the faults and failings of the statesmen wTio are to aid him in his government. He is warned not to trust any of them separately. Their hypocrisy, their greed, their frailties of character and conduct are all exposed, and the prince is told that he must listen to them all, and then decide for himself. Even the Duke of Alba, the most eminent of Charles' Spanish subjects, is dissected for the benefit of the neophyte. He is, says Charles, ambitious, sanctimonious, and hypocritical ; and perhaps even may try to tempt you (Philip) by means of women. But he is a grandee and must not be io6 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. allowed to have any share in the interior government of the kingdom. " In foreign affairs and war make use of him and respect him, as he is the best man we now have." Quite as extraordinary are the more secret instructions given to Philip with regard to his social conduct and his coming marital relations, which are to be entirely ruled by his governor, Doii Juan de Zuniga. The great lesson enforced throughout both documents is self-suppression, patience, and, above all, dis- trust ; the object being to play off one rival against another, and so by making all other men puppets, to concentrate power in the hands of the one man who held the wires. For the rest of Philip's long life these were his guiding principles, strength- ening their hold upon him as he grew in age and experience. With a heavy heart, overburdened with care, the Emperor left his son in the early spring of 1543. Before he set sail from Palamos (6 May, 1543) he impressed upon the young regent in a secret letter, meant for his eye alone, how utterly in- sufficient were his resources to meet the expenditure which he had undertaken, and urged him to provide money from Spain ; "for if our subjects be not liberal with us I know not how we shall fare." Cobos was a great finance minister and lost no time in advising the regent to summon the Castilian Cortes for the purpose of providing funds in the urgent danger of the country : " the armies of the Turk and the King of France being in winter quarters so near us." Philip married his young Portuguese cousin in November 1543, and in January 1544 the Castilian Cortes assembled in Toledo. They were at first in no very yielding mood. They had no instructions from their constituents, they said, to go beyond the votes of the previous Cortes, which had promised 300 million maravedis ' spread over the years 1546, 1547 and 1548, with 150 millions extra, payable during 1545. They had a large number of grievances, moreover, to be remedied before they would grant even this. First and most important they urged that peace ' 3040 maravedis were equal to one pound sterling. 1. 1 Philip II, 1527 — 1551. 107 should be made before the country was utterly ruined ; and the reply to this was that notliing would please the Emperor better if it were possible. It was in fact already corning home to Spaniards that world-wide empire was an expensive luxury which a naturally poor country could ill-afford. The whole of the misfortunes of Spain sprang indeed from its apparent good fortune. When the nation was united under one sovereign at the end of the fifteenth century, it still consisted of many separate races and distinct territories. The work of consoli- dation and unification of its institutions, of the development of its resources, and the civilization of its peoples, might well have absorbed its energies for a century, especially if to this task were added the colonisation and domination of the New World. Eight centuries of struggle with the infidel had stamped their mark deeply on the character of the people. They were brave, hardy, and simple in their lives. Their strong religious feeling, engendered by the fact that they had long held the Christian outposts, would probably have saved them from the religious wars which ravaged the rest of Europe; the geographical position of the country rendered it un- necessary for them to take part in the politics of Central Europe; and probably if Spain had been occupied only in its own problems it would have become the happiest and most prosperous of countries. But as ruler of Holland and Flanders it was of vital importance that the King of Spain should always be friendly with England, as a counterbalance to France, Spain had to find resources to pay for most of the vast expenditure entailed by the foreign responsibilities of its sovereign, and by the time that Philip assumed the regency it was gradually being understood that the imperial connection, which had seemed at first so splendid, was a curse instead of a blessing. Charles himself, practically a foreigner, had always been unpopular in Spain, and hardly a Cortes met during his reign which did not clamour against the extravagance and injustice of the foreign officers by whom he was surrounded. io8 Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. Thus it was that the CastiUan Cortes of 1544 showed but Httle alacrity in voting fresh suppHes for a war in which it was felt that the nation itself had but little concern. Their subsidy, such as it was, was supplemented by the Portuguese dowry and a loan from John III. Philip as Regent of Spain was eminently successful. The Emperor through all his troubles and constant ill-health kept up a close correspondence with his son, who had answered his fondest expectations. Philip's wife died after one year and eight months of wedlock, leaving a sickly baby behind her, but Philip only allowed his grief to detain him in seclusion from his public duties for three weeks. He was already extremely popular with the Spanish people. His gravity, his preference for the Spanish tongue, and his reluctance to marry a French princess, as well as his piety and moderation, had even now gained him the affection of Spaniards, which for the rest of his life he never lost. But the promise of his son, and the defeat of his enemies, once more aroused in the Emperor dreams of universal domi- nation for the benefit of his descendants, if not for himself. It had been the intention of Ferdinand the Catholic that his elder grandson should succeed to his paternal dominions, the Empire and Flanders, whilst Ferdinand, the younger, should inherit Spain and Naples. Charles, however, had arranged otherwise, and made his brother King of the Romans, with the impHed succession to the Empire. But he was determined that as little power and territory as possible should go with it, and he now proceeded to carry into effect the plan referred to (p. 97), of transferring to Philip the imperial vicariate in Italy, as well as attaching Flanders and Holland to the Spanish Crown; thus leaving the future Emperor in possession only of his Austrian dominions. Ferdinand of course did not like the arrangement, but was at last won over to it by the marriage of his son Maximilian to the Emperor's daughter Maria, and the Emperor's guarantee that on Ferdinand's death Maximilian 1.] Philip II, 1527 — 155 I. 109 should succeed him as Emperor. As soon as this was agreed to, the Emperor sent the Duke of Alba to Spain with a statement of the case for Philip's information. The Emperor's new policy was to result in untold trouble and suffering to future generations. The lordships of Flanders and Holland had not hitherto been regarded by Charles as necessarily attached to the Spanish Crown. The cession of the Nether- lands to a French prince was one of the alternative conditions of the peace of Crespy ; and since that had fallen through, Charles had discussed the advisability of handing over the Low Countries to his daughter Maria on her marriage with Maximilian. But the fatal step of making them the inalienable possessions of the ruler of Spain burdened the latter country with a new set of permanent interests, and rendered necessary a change in its foreign policy. Flanders once attached in- alienably to the Crown of Spain could never fall into the hands of France; and the latter country would find itself almost surrounded by Spanish territory. If, moreover, the Spanish suzerainty over Italy were established French influence in that country would be at an end, and the papal power dwarfed. The whole balance of Europe would thus be changed, and France and the Pope forced into a secular struggle against Spain. The possessors of the Flemish sea- board had for generations found it necessary to maintain a close alliance with England, whose interests were equally bound up in preventing France from occupying the coast opposite its own eastern shores ; the principal outlet for its commerce. But Charles' new policy transferred the vital need for a permanent English alliance to Spain itself as possessor of Flanders ; and that at a time when such an alliance was daily becoming more difficult in consequence of Henry's attitude towards the question of religious reform. Spain was thus drawn permanently into the vortex of central European politics, to its own ultimate ruin. The Emperor's new plans were not entirely to Philip's taste. no Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. Having regard to Alba's correspondence with Granvelle upon the subject it is probable that the objection did not arise from motives of prudence, but rather from the ambitious promptings of Alba himself, who would point out to the young prince that the new arrangement would permanently cut him off from the succession to the imperial Crown. At his instance, therefore, the question of the suzerainty over Italy was left open ; and with it what was doubtless Alba's real objection — namely, the ultimate succession of Maximilian to the Empire. At the desire of the Emperor, Philip was to undertake a state progress through northern Italy and the dominions of the Empire to make the acquaintance of his future subjects, and gain the popularity necessary for carrying through the new plans. In pursuance of the policy of depriving the nobles of power in the state, Charles ordered that his son's household previous to his journey should be organised for the first time according to the pompous etiquette of the house of Burgundy, which has since been adopted in most courts. The proud Spanish nobility thus became attached personally to the house- hold of the prince, in nominally domestic capacities, as chamber- lains, equerries, ushers and the like ; and the younger hidalgos no longer lived and hunted on their feudal estates, but surrounded the person of the monarch in silken and enervating idleness. The change was certainly not in accordance with Philip's personal character, for his tastes were simple, sober, modest and industrious; but he was a slave to duty, and thenceforward on state occasions moved in a constellation of splendour. On the 4th April, 1548, Philip met the Castilian Cortes ' at Valladolid and informed them of his approaching voyage, his ^ Anciently 48 cities and towns were summoned to send representatives to the Castilian Cortes, but during the period under consideration the following cities only were usually represented, Burgos, Leon, Granada, Seville, Cordoba, Murcia, Jaen, Soria, Cuenca, Salamanca, Avila, Zamora, Toro, Segovia, Guadalajara, Valladolid, Madrid and Toledo. At the first I.] Philip II, 1 5 27 — 1 5 5 I . Ill sister Maria, and lier husband Maximilian, King of Bohemia, being appointed regents during his absence from Spain. The message was an unwelcome one for the Cortes. They at once despatched a letter to the Emperor, begging him not to summon Philip away from Spain. It was bad enough, they said, that the Emperor himself should live out of his Spanish dominions, but to deprive them of their prince as well was too bad. It had now become clear to the Spaniards that the dragging of them at the tail of the Empire was causing the ruin of the country, and they desired nothing so much as that Spain should be governed by a resident native prince, and should confine herself to her own affairs. " From your Majesty's absence," wrote the Cortes, "has resulted the poverty which these kingdoms are suffering, in consequence of the great sums of money which have been sent out. This has brouglit about a total lack of gold and a great scarcity of silver, and we are sure tliat if the absence of our princes continues, these kingdoms will become much poorer and more ruined even than they are." Once more the Cortes formulated their list of grievances and protested boldly against disregard of former representa- tions. Again they demanded that the Church should hold no more land; once more they urged the codification of the law, the purification of the judicial bench, and proposed a great numljer of domestic and administrative reforms, many of which Philip ratified before he left. What however troubled the Cortes most was the financial and industrial state of the sitting of each Cortes a dispute for precedence always occurred between Burgos and Toledo, usually ending in the victory of the former and a protest by the latter. The members were paid by grants made by the King, four millions of maravedis being included for the purpose in the ordinaiy supply, but during the reigns of Philip II and Philip III con- siderable special grants and concessions were made to the members — both collectively and personally. In the latter reign a percentage on the supply 15 or 17 per cent, was sometimes given to them — a most vicious form of remuneration. 112 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. country. The economic heresies to which reference has been made (pp. 85 — 90) had already produced their baleful influence, and Spanish industry, heavily handicapped as it was, had to a large extent been supplanted by that of foreigners, even in Spanish markets. The remedy proposed by the Cortes was an extraordinary one. It was thought that, if the fine and costly textiles, mostly now the produce of foreign looms, were not shipped from Seville to the Spanish possessions, the money from America would remain in the Peninsula instead of being paid away to foreigners. The Cortes of 1548 therefore de- manded that the export of cloth and silks to the Indies should be prohibited, but the petition was only partially granted. On I St October, 1548, Philip left Valladolid on his long voyage. By slow stages and followed by a great train of courtiers he rode through Aragon and Catalonia. Andrea Doria, with a splendid fleet of fifty-five galleys, met him in the Bay of Rosas and saluted him almost as a demi-god. It is no exaggeration to say that this intense and passionate devotion to Philip reflected at this time the general feeling in Spain, where he was regarded as the native born prince who would free his people from the crushing burden of the Empire. The qualities which made him popular in Spain had a contrary eff'ect elsewhere. His reticence and gravity, his unconcealed dislike to the rough and boisterous pleasures, and the heavy eating and drinking, of the Germans and Flemings drew upon him the hatred of his father's foreign subjects. Through Genoa, Milan and Mantua, Tyrol, Germany and Luxemburg, the Spanish prince slowly progressed to meet his father in Brussels. Everywhere he was greeted by festivals, banquets, and tourneys, to a greater extent, said eye-witnesses, than ever had been seen before. He did his best, but such frivolity was not to his taste, and his journey certainly did not help forward the project of securing to him the succession of the imperial Crown. On the ist April, 1549, he made his state entry into Brussels. Chailes was still ailing. i.J Philip II, 1527—1551. 113 but gathered new life with the presence of his beloved heir; and for the next two years nearly every day Philip learnt from the great Emperor the profound lessons of government which were to rule his policy during the rest of his life. One of the subjects, upon which the Cortes of 1548 had pressed the Emperor, was that Philip should marry again. He had now been a widower for four years, and had contracted a mor- ganatic connection with Dona Isabel de Osorio, by wliom he had several children. His only legitimate child was the lame epileptic Don Carlos, and during Philip's stay in Brussels several matrimonial schemes were discussed between him and the Emperor. Jeanne D'Albret was again suggested, but Philip leant rather towards another Portuguese cousin, tlie daughter of the old King Manoel and Charles's sister Leonora, who after Manoel's death had married Francis I. But greater affairs even than marriages were discussed at the same time — nothing less, indeed, than the ultimate reversion of the imperial Crown to Philip, and the exercise by him of the Emperor's suzerainty over Italy even during his uncle Ferdinand's life. When after infinite negotiation this had been agreed upon in principle, Philip accompanied his father to the Diet of Augsburg, and finally started in May 1551 on his voyage home to Spain. II. s. 114 CHAPTER II. PHILIP II, 1 55 1 — 1560. Philip arrived at Barcelona on the 13th July, 155 1, and at once summoned the Castilian Cortes in Madrid to vote supplies. As usual, the long list of petitions for reforms was presented to the regent, and equally as usual, the consideration of the grievances was postponed ; the Cortes being dismissed as soon as they had voted the ordinary subsidy of 404 million marave- dis spread over three years. The Aragonese Cortes of the following year once more showed how much greater was their parliamentary power than that of the Castilians, since they insisted upon their grievances being considered before the subsidies were voted. The result was that a great mass of legislation of a popular character was passed, especially in matters relating to the liberty of the subject, together with the reform of judicial abuses, and a great sumptuary law prohibiting extravagance in dress. Philip continued the negotiations for marriage with his Portuguese cousin, but he found John III less inclined to be liberal in the matter of dowry for his half-sister than he had been for his daughter, and the matter hung fire. Philip's bosom friend and favourite, Ruy Gomez — a Portuguese by birth — was sent in June 1553 to persuade the King of Portugal to loosen his purse strings ; but during his absence from Spain an event happened which entirely changed the Emperor's Chap. n. J Philip II, 1351 — 1560. 115 plans. It had been known for some time that Edward VI of England was in failing health, but the extent of Northumber- land's power and following was still uncertain ; and Charles' principal desire with regard to England had hitherto been to keep on friendly terms with it. But the evil effects of attach- ing Flanders to the Crown of Spain were already working. Without the strength of the Empire behind him, the possessor of Flanders, with a covetous France on one side and Protes- tant princes on the other, was in an untenable position unless he could depend upon England's co-operation through thick and thin. When the events following on the death of Edward VI proved that English loyalty was stronger than its attach- ment to the reformed religion, Charles suddenly seized the opportunity presented. The hollow Crown of the Empire, with its turbulent Protestant princes, might go. If England could be joined in lasting union with Spain, then France would be humbled and Spain supreme in Christendom. Mary entered London on 3rd August, 1553, with the imperial ambassador Renard by her side, and only four days afterwards Philip's name was suggested to her as that of her future husband. The English people themselves had fixed upon young Edward Courtenay, and Mary was as yet uncertain how far she dared thwart them. But she knew full well the French plots to keep her out of her birthright, and longed for the strong arms and subtle brains of her Spanish kinsmen to sup- port her. She, too, was a grand-daughter of the ecstatic Isabel the Catholic, a daughter of highly-strung Catherine of Aragon, and a niece of Juana the Mad; and religious fervour aided dynastic expediency in her choice of a spouse. Philip was a dutiful son. He was 26 years of age, and his domestic arrange- ments with Dona Isabel de Osorio were on an established foot- ing. But he was a politician and a patriot before all things : personal pleasure was never his aim in life, and at Charles' bidding, in a true spirit of sacrifice, he consented to marry Mary Tudor. London was in a panic at the news, and Mary's 8—2 ii6 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. council made hard terms with the coming consort. They had taken Renard's bribes willingly enough, but from stern Gardiner downwards, they were determined that, come what might, England should never be ruled from Spain. Renard and his master subscribed to all the conditions, in the hope that Philip's influence with the Queen after marriage would enable him to have his way. What they failed to understand was, that Mary herself was powerless against the will of her Council, and against the English people, who dreaded and hated the Spaniard. Philip was a gallant suitor to his elderly bride, and more splendour was lavished over this marriage than the world had ever seen. Charles was still at war with France, and Philip brought with him from Corunna to Southampton, where he landed (20 July, 1554), a fine fleet of a hundred sail with 6000 soldiers to reinforce his father. He had been warned to conciliate the English in all things, and he learnt his lesson well. He conformed, as well as might be, to English fashions and prejudice, offended his Spanish courtiers by openly preferring English attendants, and prohibited the land- ing in England of a single soldier from the fleet. In England he became personally not unpopular, for he was always on the side of moderation, and studiously abstained from publicly interfering in the government. His object was to win over England by persuasion to the Catholic Church, which would have led to the political domination of Spain. But he and his father were politicians first and religious fanatics afterwards ; and on this occasion, as on many others, the zeal of the Churchmen thwarted the Statesmen. Cardinal Pole, the pope's legate, was stopped by the Emperor's influ- ence on his way to England, until he had been persuaded not to take any hasty steps in the matter of the restitution of Church property confiscated during the previous reigns. Philip and Renard prevailed upon him not to insist upon the return of lands that had passed into private hands, and he was then allowed to proceed to England. Mary's hope of progeny was II.] Philip II, \ SSI — 1 5 60. 117 again and again disappointed, and Philip stayed on in vain expectation. The Emperor in the meanwhile was sinking into torpor and despair, yearning hourly for the coming of his son, who should take from his shoulders the burden they were no longer capable of supporting. In vain Renard told him that as soon as Philip left England the bigots in Mary's Council would carry to its bitter end the persecution which King Philip's influence alone had hitherto kept in check. But, at last, Charles would v/ait no longer and peremptorily sum- moned his son. By August 1555 the rogations to the Almighty for the birth of an heir were discontinued, and the great plan of the dynastic union of Spain and England was seen to be a failure. An Anglo-Spanish power ruling England, Spain, Holland and Flanders, supreme over most of Italy, and the Mediterranean, with the riches of the Indies in its hands, would have dominated the world. France, shut in on every side by land and sea, could have progressed no more ; and Spain would have become paramount more completely than if the Emperor's first plan of universally extending the power of the Roman-Austrian empire had been realised. But it was not to be, and Philip made the best of it, with all courtesy and gentleness to his disappointed wife, whom he left, sick at heart and failing in body, on the 26th August, 1555. She watched him from the window of her palace at Greenwich as his boat dropped down the river to Gravesend, and thenceforward, powerless alone to stay her bigoted councillors, was constrained to consent to the lighting of the hellish fires of Smithficld, which will for ever cast a baleful glow upon her wretched reign. From Flanders Philip sought to restrain the persecution, which was entirely against his political interests. What he wanted was the aid of English ships and men against the French. Here the English Councillors were not so ready, for of all things they feared to be dragged into a war with France, and such help as they gave was obtained by Philip on specious pretexts, and granted with grudging unwillingness. Ii8 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. The Emperor was falling a prey to the last extreme of senile mental and bodily depression when Philip arrived in Flanders. " Fortune is a strumpet," he said after the disaster of Metz, "and reserves her favours for the young" — and to the shoulders of his son he determined to shift his burden. He had already, on Philip's marriage in Winchester cathedral, conferred upon him the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily, and had confirmed to him the duchy of Milan, the latter a fief of the Empire. He now determined to hand over to him the sovereignty of the Netherlands. The scene, one of the most dramatic in history, took place in the great hall of the palace of Brussels, on the 25th October, 1555. All that could add impressiveness and solemnity to the ceremony was done to mark the greatness of the occasion. The prematurely aged Emperor leaning on the shoulder of the youthful William of Orange, in a voice broken with tears took a last farewell of his Flemish subjects whom he loved best. He was a Fleming at heart, and the leavetaking was an affecting one on both sides. The Emperor prayed his son to treat his new vassals well, but the Flemings knew that their new Sovereign's heart was for Spain alone, and that though Philip might be their ruler, he could never be their father and friend as the Emperor had been. For once Philip's own self-control gave way at the affecting scene, and it was only after some delay that he could summon sufficient composure to speak — and then alas! only to say that he was unable to address his subjects in their own tongue, and must depute the task to another, Antoine de Perennot, the bishop of Arras (Cardinal de Granvelle). On 1 6th January, 1556, the crowns of Spain were also transferred to Philip, and Charles remained Emperor only in name, until the German electors were prepared for his abdi- cation in favour of his brother Ferdinand. Before he turned his back upon the world for ever, and went to fret his life away in the cloisters of Yuste, he arranged (February 1556) a truce for five years with his old enemy the King of France, wlio II.] Philip Ily \i-)\ — 1560. 119 by the treaty of Vaucelles was thus for a time separated from his ally the Pope. Philip now stands on the stage alone, the most powerful monarch in the world. He had from his very childhood adopted the statecraft of his greater father, and held by it slavishly for the rest of his life. By nature reticent and dis- trustful, slow and secretive, his qualities had been accentuated by the schooling of his mentors. His inherited religious ex- altation, and belief in his divine inspiration, made his methods rigid and unadaptable. He was pitted against opponents whose opportunism and elastic consciences gave them an enormous advantage over him, and the task which he inherited could hardly have had a more unfortunate champion than the monarch who led it to defeat. His sense of duty was over- whelmingly great. He was modest, laborious and conscien- tious, almost to a fault; a good husband and father; and he strenuously did his best through life, according to his limited lights. He accepted his great inheritance as a sacred trust, but his qualities were not equal to his task, and he was a splendid failure. It cannot be too often repeated that, although he was personally pious, his aims were in the main political rather than religious. The irony of events decreed that the very first task to which he set his hand should be to fight the Holy See. The policy of his father had wrested from one pontiff after another their rights over the Spanish clergy, until at last the vast revenues of the Church were used mainly as an instru- ment of governmental policy ; and the priests were made to understand that they depended for promotion, not upon the Pope, but upon their sovereign. The royal council claimed the right of supervising the ecclesiastical courts, and of with- holding the circulation of the papal bulls in Spain. The Inquisition itself was quite as much a political as a religious institution, and was jealously regarded by Philip as being under his immediate control when it suited him. Philip's anomalous position in Italy rendered still more 120 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. difficult his relations with the Italian popes, whom he never regarded otherwise than as tools to be used for the furtherance of his political objects, notwithstanding all the exaggerated lip-deference with which he treated them. The Spanish en- croachments in Italy, and the claims of the Spanish monarchs to exclusive control over the temporalities of the Church in Sicily and Naples, which had been suffered with a bad grace by previous pontiffs, aroused the Neapolitan Paul IV (Caraffa) to fury. He launched the most violent invectives against the Emperor and Philip. The Spaniards, he said, were the vile and abject spawn of Jews, the dregs of the world, and must be expelled, neck and crop, from Italy. The aid of the Sultan Solyman was invoked by the Christian pontiff, while Henry II was inflamed by exhortation and reproach beyond measure, and was at last induced to break the truce of Vaucelles in June 1556, only four months after it had been signed. Then the Pope broke through all bounds of decency and decorum, for he thought he had Philip at his mercy. A violent bull of excommunication was issued against the Emperor and his son. The latter is addressed as "the son of iniquity, Philip of Austria, offspring of the so-called Emperor Charles, who passes himself off as King of Spain; following in the footsteps of his father and rivalling him in iniquity." The position was a difficult one for Philip. He could not afford to degrade the papacy, upon which he looked as one of his principal levers, and yet he must fight the Pope, or lose his Italian states. He was Duke of Milan, a fief of the Empire, his troops had occupied the principalities of Parma and Piacenza, whilst he was independent sovereign of Sicily and Naples. The French still occupied Piedmont, and during the first campaign before Philip's accession had ousted the im- perialists from Siena. The imperial troops in Milan had been hitherto a coercive power over the other imperial fiefs, but under Philip they could no longer be so regarded, as they were the forces of a Spanish prince, who himself was in Milan a ii-l Philip II, 1 55 1 — 1560. 121 tributary of the Emperor. On his accession Philip had sent Alba from England with very full powers to exercise all his sovereignties in Italy, an appointment not to the taste of the Emperor, but probably prompted by a desire on the part of Ruy Gomez, who was the leader of the party of peace and diplomacy in Philip's councils, to remove the warlike old noble from his master's side. On the second coalition against Spain after the rupture of the truce of Vaucelles, Alba invaded the papal states, and nearly captured Rome itself, but he was well matched by Guise, who commanded the Franco-papal forces. Suddenly Henry II found a powerful army from Flanders marching upon Paris, and Guise had to be recalled to France. By the aid of the Doge of Venice a peace was patched up between the Pope and Philip, and Alba sulkily entered Rome, not as a conqueror but as a pretended penitent. Paul IV was conciliated with futile concessions, and Philip was left face to face with France. It was vital for him that he should obtain English aid — the last and only benefit he was ever likely to get now from his marriage with Mary, who was sorrowfully wearing herself into her grave. The English Council were determined not to serve purely Spanish aims, or to allow themselves to be diverted from extirpating heresy ; so the King, sorely against his will, had again to go to England, and exert his personal influence. He arrived on 20th March, 1557, and found his wife ready enough to be avenged upon Henry and his ambassador de Noailles, for their intrigues against her. But the English Coun- cil stood in the way. They had always dreaded this result of a Spanish match, and had no special quarrel with France. The French King however sought to counteract Pliilip's influ- ence in England, by aiding the discontent of the English Protestant refugees in France, and promoting Stafford's foolish attempt on Scarborough. This act of hostility gave Mary an opportunity of persuading her Council, and war between Eng- land and France was declared on the 7th July, 1557. On the 122 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. 3rd of the following month Philip bade a last farewell to his wife, and returned to Brussels, well contented with his success. 8000 English troops were got ready and sent to join Philip's force of 50,000 men in Flanders, under his gallant young cousin Emmanuel PhiHbert, Duke of Savoy. By a series of rapid and masterly movements Savoy managed to outwit Coligny and Montmorenci, who commanded the French forces, and won the great battle of St Quentin on the loth August. 6000 of the French troops were killed, as many more captured, with all the artillery, and Montmorenci him- self taken prisoner; Coligny held out inside the town of St Quentin until 27th August, when the place was taken by assault, amidst scenes of heartless carnage and horror, mainly the work of German mercenaries, which will for ever remain one of the most dreadful episodes of modern warfare. After the destruction of Montmorenci's force nothing stood between Philip's victorious army and Paris. This was his great chance; and he missed it. Overcaution was almost a mania with him, and he refused Savoy's request to be allowed to march on the French capital. When the Emperor heard in his cloistered seclusion the news of the great battle, his first question was whether his son had arrived in Paris. The Spaniards com- plained that the English had behaved badly at St Quentin ; the English were sulky and discontented ; and soon the same spirit was seen in the rest of the force, consisting, as it did, of many jarring nationalities distributed idly amongst the French captured towns. Wages were in arrear, the German mercenaries quarrelled and deserted, the English clamoured to be sent home, and Philip dreading unpopularity in England let them go. Thus his force dwindled, and in a few weeks the fine French army under Guise marched back from Italy. The English fortress of Calais was known to be neglected. Sud- denly Guise appeared before it, stormed the crumbling under- manned outworks (2nd and 3rd January, 1558) and finally captured the citadel on the 8th of the month. Lord Went- 11. j Philip II, 155 1 — 1560. 123 worth was in command, but the forces at his disposal were utterly inadequate to defend the place. As a natural result of the fall of Calais the other English fortress of Guisnes was captured from Lord Grey a few days afterwards, and the last foothold of the English in France was gone. In England counsels were distracted, the war was unpopular, and men were thinking rather of what was to come when the Queen died, than of passing events. When Feria, Philip's friend and ambassador, saw the Council in Pole's chamber (28th January, 1558) to beg for further English aid, they were tearful, apolo- getic, but despairing, and begged for mercenary Germans to be sent to England, instead of sending Englishmen away. Philip assented, and the money was drawn from England to pay for the German levies; but they were eventually utilised by Philip, as no doubt was intended from the first. The English Council, too, were deluded into the belief that an attempt was to be made to recover Calais, and fitted out a fleet; but this also was made use of in the Spanish interests, and at a critical moment (13 July, 1558) turned the tide of victory against the French at Gravelines, preventing an intended march upon Brussels, and compelling Guise to stand on the defensive. Philip's treasury was empty; he was deeply in debt, his troops mutinous, and he hated war. Henry II was in similar straits, and was already looking with dread upon the growth of the party of religious reform in France. Both parties were tired of the struggle, and peace negotiations were opened, Granvelle, Alba, and Orange, representing Philip, Cardinal Lorraine, Mont- morenci and St Andre, the French King; English interests being safeguarded by the Earl of Arundel, Dr Thirlby bishop of Ely, and Dr Wotton. Soon after the negotiations com- menced Mary Tudor died (17th November, 1558). Feria had hurried over to England, but the Queen was almost uncon- scious when lie arrived, and he at once set about propiliating Elizabeth at Hatfield. England had slipped through Philip's hands, but it was vital to his power that it should remain 1 24 Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. friendly to him. If Elizabeth could be married to his nominee all might still be well : but the new Queen showed Feria in her first interview with him that she declined to be patronised. Savoy, who had always been the Spanish candidate for her hand, was again suggested but dropped, for the English dreaded that he might drag them into war to recover his terri- tory from the French. Then Philip himself was tentatively brought forward by Feria, but Elizabeth was coyly irresponsive, and proved herself fully a match for the diplomatists who sought to pledge her to a marriage that should bind her to Spain. Such a marriage, indeed, could only have been possible on conditions that would have vitiated her own claim to the throne. So long as there seemed to be any prospect of his being allowed to influence English policy, Phihp stood by the side of the English envoys in demanding the restitution of Calais as a condition of peace, but when Elizabeth's attitude was defined he gave her clearly to understand that, if peace could only be made with the loss of Calais, then Calais must go. Elizabeth was not in a position to go to war with France alone, for her own position was uncertain, and her treasury empty ; so at last the bitter pill had to be swallowed, and the peace of Cateau Cambresis was signed (2 April, 1559), Calais remaining in the hands of the French. This was an important juncture, upon which the future of Spain was mainly to depend. The keystone of Philip's policy was a close and constant alliance with England : a policy imposed upon him by his inheritance of the Netherlands, but which the circumstances of Elizabeth's birth and her personal character made well-nigh impossible, whilst she remained Queen of England. There were even thus early two well- defined parties in Philip's Councils, for this was part of his cautious method of having every question debated from both points of view. The nobles and soldiers of the Alba school ceaselessly urged upon him that he must overturn Elizabeth, by force of arms if necessary, before she had time to con- II. J Philip II, \.^^\ — 1560. 125 solidate her position ; above all things, they said, no lime must be lost. The people of England were mainly Catholic at heart, many of the principal nobles and councillors were in the pay of Spain, and Philip must strike with promptitude and boldness. But Philip was timid and slow. Ruy Gomez and the bishop of Arras (de Granvelle) were by his side to advise moderation and diplomacy, and though Feria might sneer, the King would not be hurried into violent action. As usual, he pondered until it was too late, and the opportunity had slipped away, to the dismay of those who had always held as an article of political faith that the possessor of the Netherlands must live in close amity with England. Philip's own alternative com- bination was characteristic of his peaceful methods. One of the principal reasons why Henry II was anxious for peace in 1558 was, as we have seen, his dread of the growing power of the religious reformers in France. Philip at the time was not actively responsive on the point, as the religious agitation in the Netherlands had not become acute, and the position of England was undefined. But now Elizabeth's firm attitude had changed the problem. By the draft treaty of Gateau Cambresis Henry's eldest daughter was betrothed to Philip's only son Carlos, who was now fourteen, the bride being three months younger. Philip decided to marry the young princess himself, and so to unite France and Spain in close bonds, to the confusion of Elizabeth and the Protestants throughout Europe. His policy towards England was not aggressive : he only sought to render her innocuous. The next heir after Elizabeth was Mary Stuart, the dauphiness of France, and practically a Frenchwoman. Better a thousand times for him that the heretic Elizabeth should remain Queen than that France, Scotland and England, should be ruled by the same hand. Then indeed would the Netherlands be in jeopardy ; and Philip doubtless thought that it would be easier to prevent such a consummation from the inside, than from the outside. So Alba with a splendid train entered Paris late in June 1559 1 26 Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. to marry by proxy the beautiful little princess (Elizabeth of the Peace as the Spaniards called her) for his master King Philip. The union began unhappily, for Henry II was accidentally killed by a thrust in the eye, by the lance of Montgomerie the captain of the Scots Guard ; but the beautiful French princess became one of the most beloved of Spanish Queens, and her sweetness, wisdom and goodness completely won Philip's heart. The King was yearning for his darling Spain. It had not taken long for his policy of personal concentration of govern- ment to bring the storm clouds over his Netherlands. The Emperor, a Fleming himself, might do much and be forgiven by the sturdy burghers, but Philip was Spanish, and unsympa- thetic to the core, and a measure which would have been popular from a native sovereign was from him the reverse. His proposal to reconstitute the Flemish hierarchy, and create fourteen new bishoprics and three archbishoprics, was looked upon by the Netherlanders with sulky disapproval, and the presence of 4000 Spanish troops in the country aroused the fear that Spanish views both of government and religion were to be forced upon the autonomous States at the point of the pike. Philip had to listen to some bold talk at the farewell meeting of the States, and a petition was presented to him begging that the Spanish troops might be withdrawn, signed by the principal nobles of the Nethei lands. Orange and Egmont amongst them. As was his wont, however, he dissembled, though he must already have decided in his stealthy way, that this manifestation must be crushed ruthlessly, if these stubborn States were to be ruled according to his centralising notions from Spain. He left the difficult task of governing the country to the Duchess of Parma, a daughter of the Emperor by a Flemish lady, and now married to Ottavio Farnese, whose principalities had been taken, and subsequently restored to him, by the imperial troops. The choice of a Regent was not an unpopular one, but all the hatred and resistance of the Flemings fell upon the man whom Philip designated as II.] Philip II, 1551 — 1560. 127 his sister's prime adviser, Antoine de Perennot, Cardinal de Granvelle, a Franche-Comtois and a foreigner, whose very appointment was regarded by the Flemings as a violation of their rights of self-government. When, therefore, Philip sailed for Spain (August 1559) he left behind him an atmosphere charged with trouble, which very soon was to develop into deadly strife. In his absence Spain had been governed by his widowed sister Juana, whose ycung husband, Don Joao of Portugal, had died just before her appointment, leaving her with an infant who afterwards became the unfortunate King Don Sebastian. In May 1555, less than a year after Philip's departure on his matrimonial errand to England, it became necessary to summon the Cortes of Castile to vote supplies. Their parlia- mentary powers were in process of extinction, but they made some show of asserting them. When they conveyed to the regent the intelligence that they had voted 404 million marave- dis for three years' supply, they presented 133 petitions for reform and remonstrated mildly against the disregard of similar presentments from previous Cortes. Once again they begged for a codification of the law, clamoured against the encroach- ments of the clergy, against luxury in coaches and dress, against the unjust incidence of taxation, the abuses of criminal pro- cedure: in fact, they brought out all the old grievances, as fruitlessly as heretofore, — for they had voted the money first. Amongst other subsidiary petitions they begged that bull-fights should be abolished and that the household of the Prince Don Carlos should be arranged on the old Spanish lines, and not in the pompous new-fangled way of the house of Burgundy. But whilst they were clutching at these shadows, the very substance of their parliamentary rights was being haughtily taken from them. It had been a rule of the old Cortes that laws made by them could only be repealed by a vote of Cortes. In pursu- ance of the centralising system introduced by Charles, decrees had been issued by him abrogating parliamentary statutes, and 128 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. the Cortes of 1555 begged that in future the old legal course should be followed. No answer at all was vouchsafed for three years, and then Philip gave one which fittingly foreshadowed the spirit in which he meant to govern. "If I please," he replied, " I shall annul without the Cortes the laws made in Cortes. I shall legislate by pragmatic, and I shall repeal by pragmatic." A meek protest was also raised, both in the Cortes and by the persons interested, against the arbitrary seizing for national purposes of the money coming to Seville from the Indies, on account of private merchants; but the leaders of the protest had been loaded with irons and cast into prison, and henceforward the trading and industrial classes bore the vast burden of national expenditure, with hardly any audible murmur. In matters of religion, however, the position even in Spain was not so tranquil. The steady policy of Charles and Philip was to bring the Spanish Church under subjection to the monarch. The rich ecclesiastical preferments were now all in the King's hand, and the clergy mainly subservient. During Philip's absence and his struggle with the Pope, the Spanish council had forcibly excluded the papal bulls from Spain, and the regent had imprisoned the messengers who bore them. It was seen that, however ceremoniously Philip might treat the papacy when it suited his political objects, he looked upon it, hke all else, as a tool for his semi-divine mission ; and that the holy Church was to be no exception to his determination that all power, temporal and spiritual, in his dominions, should be centred in himself. The Inquisition, especially, had been guarded against any effective interference from Rome, and had already begun to assume its character as a great political agency in the hands of the monarch, working behind an ecclesi- astical mask. So far as Philip's personal experience extended, all resistance to authority arose from religious divergence, and with his views as to the identity of his interests with those of the Almighty, it was obviously his duty to crush ruthlessly all II.] Philip II, 1 55 I — 1560. 129 manifestations of a spirit of religious independence that might lead to rebellion against his authority. The Inquisition was a convenient means for this purpose, and it became necessary for him to strengthen its authority by supporting it through thick and thin. Whilst Philip was in Brussels, he had ap- pointed to the archbishopric of Toledo, the richest see in the world, his confessor Bartolom^ de Carranza, who had made himself conspicuous by his eloquent attempts whilst in England to refute the views of the reformers. The archbishop arrived in Spain in time to stand at the deathbed of the Emperor at Yuste, and in August, 1559, was suddenly summoned from Alcala by the regent. He knew that the spies of the Inqui- sition had been following him from his first landing in Spain, and fearing the meaning of the summons, tried diplomatically to delay his journey until the expected arrival of the King. He was however suddenly dragged from his bed, and carried off to the prisons of the Inquisition at Valladolid. His arrest caused the greatest consternation and indignation throughout Spain. He was accused of heretical writing in a certain com- mentary of his on the Catechism, which writing was unani- mously approved by the Pope and the Congregation of the Index in Rome. Public opinion in Spain made no secret of its belief that he was a victim to the jealousy of Valdes, Archbishop of Seville, Inquisitor-General, who resented his elevation to the primacy. If Philip had arrived in time to pre- vent his arrest he would no doubt have escaped, but matters assumed another appearance when the Archbishop was in the hands of the Inquisition. Philip was friendly with Carranza, and had no reason for tlesiring his ruin ; but the Inquisition must be supported at all risks ; and so for many years it be- came a pitched battle between the King and the Inquisition on the one hand, and the whole Catholic Church on the other. The Pope Pius V in 1566 sought to exert his influence, and threatened to excommunicate Philip unless Carranza were sent to Rome ; but the great struggle ended at last, practically in H. s. Q 130 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. the victory of the Inquisition, for although Gregory XIII con- demned Carranza to only a slight penance, he died an exile from his diocese and from Spain, in May 1576. Philip arrived in Spain on the 8th September, 1559, and almost his first act was to mark his personal participation in the effort of the Inquisition to extirpate heresy in Spain. Before his arrival the regent Juana and his son Don Carlos had sat in the great square of Valladolid (21st May, 1559) whilst three Spanish priests and others convicted for heresy were burnt at the stake. The Cortes of Castile were sitting in Valladolid at the time, and a great multitude came from far and near to see the grand sight, the first auto da fe' that had ever been witnessed in state by a prince of the house of Spain. But this show was surpassed when on October i8th Philip himself sat in his splendidly decked balcony opposite the Church of St Martin at Valladolid, surrounded by a great multitude, frantic with joy to see their beloved prince again, and to enjoy a brilliant holiday and obtain the forty days' in- dulgence with which the Church rewarded them for their attendance. In their presence Philip swore solemnly to main- tain the purity of the faith, and to support the Holy Office, and as the condemned wretches passed his balcony on their way to death, one noble, Don Carlos de Sessa, crippled in all his limbs by the tortures he had undergone, demanded of Philip, "as from one gentleman to another," why he had submitted him to such indignity as this. Philip answered him in the ominous words, " If my son were as perverse as you, I myself would carry the fuel to born him." It is probable that Philip's object in thus celebrating his return home, was to strengthen the prestige of the tribunal which henceforward was to be used as a main instrument for keeping his country from the civil and religious dissensions, which he saw spreading over the rest of the world. In any case, the attitude he adopted, and even the Inquisition itself, were not unpopular with Spaniards. It must not be forgotten II.] Philip II, 155 1 — 1560. 131 that the country had been fighting for many centuries with the enemies of the Christian faith, and that the great majority of Spaniards exulted in the idea that their nation, and especially their monarch, had been selected to make, as they and he thought, common cause with the Almighty for the extirpation of His enemies. In the meanwhile Philip's plans for the isolation of England, by the close union of Spain and France, were pro- gressing amidst many difficulties. The two countries had been enemies and rivals for many years, and the deepest distrust still existed between them. The lovely young princess, whom Alba had wedded as the King's proxy, slowly travelled through France, amidst the lamentations and pity of her brother's subjects. Both they and she knew that she was to be handed over as a mere chattel to the Spanish King whom they feared and hated. At the frontier endless ques- tions of etiquette and mutual jealousies had to be settled before she was allowed to cross the Pyrenees, and it was not until the 30th January, 1560, that Philip met his child- wife at Guadalajara. Their first interview was not propitious. Philip was 33, and looked older, with his grave face ; the Queen was only 14 ; and as she gazed in nervous silence at her new husband he asked her roughly whether she was looking for his grey hairs. But they were, withal, well matched, and in a domestic sense the next few years were the happiest in PhiHp's life ; though in his home circle, and with his servants, he was always just, considerate, and beloved. The new Queen fell ill of smallpox immediately after the marriage at Toledo, and regardless of the remonstrances of those who feared for his own health, her husband hardly left her during her long illness and convalescence. Much depended upon her life apparently, especially for her mother. Catharine de Medici, after years of neglect, found herself by the death of her husband practically arbitress of France, and henceforward she meant, if she could, to keep the balance of power in her 132 Spain: its greatness and decay. [Chap. 11. own hands. For the moment the Guises were paramount, for the Queen-Consort was their niece Mary Stuart, but the Vendomes, the Montmorencys, and the Protestants, were ever on the watch, and if Catharine, through her daughter, could secure a hold upon Philip, she might be mistress of France, whatever faction was uppermost. The young Queen was therefore well schooled in her lesson by her clever mother. Her task was to win the cold heart of her husband, at any cost or sacrifice, and to draw the dynasties of Prance and Spain closer together. The Queen played her part with infinite tact and prudence. Almost daily letters from her mother kept her from the natural mistakes of her youth ; and in the inevitable bickerings between the French and Spanish courtiers who surrounded her she so bore herself as to increase her popularity with both parties. Her personal charm compelled the love of all who approached her and she did her best. But circumstances are stronger than individuals and she was sacrificed in vain. ^35 CHAPTER III. PHILIP II, 1560— 1568. With the return of Philip to Spain in 1559 may be said to commence the long period of his personal government, which left indelible traces on the history of his country. We have already glanced at his personal limitations, and the exterior problems which he inherited; we will now consider the in- terior condition of Spain itself, in order that we may be able at a later stage to understand the effect of the policy which he inaugurated. The representative institutions of Castile had been undermined by Charles, during whose reign the nobles and clergy were excluded from the Cortes. Under Charles and Phihp the municipal life of the country, which had been so vigorous, was completely destroyed, the corregidores of the towns becoming simply magistrates appointed by the royal authority and subservient to the Council of Castile. The town councils had in former times been the basis of parlia- mentary representation, and with their degradation, and the subsequent corruption introduced, the Cortes became merely an institution for legalising the exactions demanded by the sovereign of the people. The administration of the country was nominally confided to eleven councils, the principal of which were the Council of Slate, the Council of Castile, the Council of Finance, and the Council of War. The first of these had in the earlier reigns practically assumed nearly all the executive power, but under Philip and his father it became 1 34 Spain : its greatness and decay. [Chap. a consultative body of favourites appointed by the King, every subject touching the international relations of the country being submitted to it for infinite discussion and report to the King by the Secretary of State. The Council of Castile was concerned in the administration of justice and the interior government, whilst the functions of the Councils of War and Finance are indicated by their names. Practically, however, every matter was now brought under the consideration of Philip himself. Early and late he toiled at his desk, copiously annotating the reports of the councils brought to him by his secretaries, reading letters and drafting rephes. Matters of the gravest moment were delayed, almost indefinitely, whilst the councils were discussing and rediscussing every aspect of them, and reporting, again and again, to the King. Ambassadors and Viceroys were frequently driven to despair whilst their important letters were left unanswered month after month. Concentrated personal government, which had been the ideal of the Emperor, became a reality under the reign of his son. Men of initiative and power were not sought, or re- quired : the ideal minister was a diligent clerk, and it was part of the system that none but men whom the sovereign had raised from the mire, and who could be cast down again by him should have real power in the central government. The nobles, divested of legislative power, had been encouraged in lavish expenditure about the court. Idleness had sapped their vigour as a class, and during the reign of Phihp their vast entailed estates were heavily overburdened with debt. In pursuance of his invariable system he did his best to promote jealousy and division amongst them; and although the number of small nobles holding seignorial rights over towns was largely increased by the purchase of seignories from Charles and Philip, the Crown lost no opportunity of curtailing their privileges and favouring their vassals in all appeals against them. Only in foreign wars, viceroyalties and diplomacy, did Philip consider it safe to employ great nobles. III.] Philip II, 1560 — I56