510 H '/,''! .'I >f' : - .:*:; ;.. : ; :, V ;; ; '., . K . ^J^ < I --:: M^ y University of California. nir : /'--, : i w ' I i , : : .-: A MEMORIAL OF THE SEMI-CENTENARY CELEBRATION OP THE FOUNDING OF THE THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF CONNECTICUT. HARTFORD, CONN.: PRESS OF THE CASE, LOCKWOOD & BRAINARD COMPANY. 1884. W 3 PREFATORY NOTE. At the annual meeting of the Pastoral Union of Connecti- cut, in the Chapel of Hosmer Hall, Hartford, May 8, 1884, Rev. Graham Taylor, Rev. John H. Goodell, and J. M. Allen, Esq., were appointed a committee to publish at their discretion the proceedings of the semi-centennial celebration of the Theological Institute of Connecticut. Congratulating the officers and students, the graduates and friends of the Institute upon the record of its past history, the substantial and invaluable attainments of the present, and the still brighter prospects of growing power and useful- ness in the future, the Committee present as a fitting Memo- rial of the Semi-Centennial Anniversary, I. A brief account of the gbservance of the occasion. II. The papers, addresses, and letters prepared for the celebration abridged in accordance with the design of this publication. III. An appendix containing reports of the past year's work, an account of the closing exercises with the address of Professor Riddle to the Graduating Class. THE SEMI-CENTENNIAL ANNIVERSARY. In May 1883, a committee representing the Pastoral Union, Trustees, Faculty, and Alumni, was appointed to make arrangements for the celebration of the semi-centennial anniversary of the Institute. At an early day, all who had been students of the Seminary, and the members of the Pas- toral Union, received a cordial invitation to participate in the memorial observance on. Wednesday, May 7, 1884:. Special invitations were also extended to many residents of Hartford, and notices of the services were published in the local news- papers. Returning alumni and invited guests were welcomed to the generous hospitality of the homes of the many friends of the Seminary in the city. From a wider extent of territory than was ever before represented on any occasion in the history of the Institute, its graduates and friends gathered in numbers that did honor to the commemoration, and betokened their loyalty to its past and future. Assurances of warm interest in the Institution and its jubilee were received from foreign and home missionaries and pastors, unable to be present. The weather all through the anniversary days was unpropitious. A cold northeast storm prevailed; but the attendance at the business meeting of the Alumni Associa- tion, at an early hour on Wednesday, was large. Rev. Dr. A. C. Thompson was chosen president, Rev. S. B. Forbes of Rockville, Conn., vice-president, with Rev. Gr. W. Winch of Enfield, secretary for three years. Appropriate mention was made of the death of Rev. M. S. Goodale, D.D., of Amster- 6 dam, "N. Y., of the class of '36, the first that graduated from the Seminary, and who was to have given a paper on Dr. Nettleton on this occasion, also of Rev. Benjamin Howe, class of '41, of Linebrook, Ipswich, Mass. The Chapel of Hosmer Hall, and one of the adjoining rooms, were filled at the opening of the commemorative exercises, by the large audience, which, besides the guests from abroad, included many friends from the city. At ten o'clock Rev. S. B. Forbes, vice-president of the Alumni Association, took the chair, and called upon Rev. Dr. Laurie of Providence, to offer prayer. Rev. Lyman Whiting, D.D., read the Scriptures, and after singing, Mr. Rowland Swift, in behalf of the Trustees and the citizens of Hartford, delivered a most felicitous and hearty address of welcome. Rev. Professor William Thompson, the venerable Dean of the Faculty, then delivered the Historical Discourse, reviewing, as only an eye-witness could, the life and work of the Institute during the half-century of its existence, and of his own life-work in its service. Rev. Lavalette Perrin, D.D., followed with a paper on Dr. Bennet Tyler, the Seminary's only "President" and first Professor of Theology. The close and vital " Relation of the Seminary to the Cause of Foreign Missions," was thoroughly and interestingly devel- oped by Rev. Dr. A. C. Thompson of Boston. The hour for recess having arrived, it was necessary to omit the reading of Rev. Dr. H. M. Parsons' tribute to the ever- blessed memory of Rev. Asahel Nettleton, D.D., whose character and work are sacredly cherished among the suc- cessive generations of students as a most precious inherit- ance of the past, and a bright goal of their high calling. The intermission afforded a pleasant opportunity for the social reunion and intercourse of the large company present. The main hall and its adjoining rooms were thronged with ladies and gentlemen, many of the latter meeting, after long separation, as old friends and fellow-students. At 1 o'clock two hundred and fifty guests were seated in the music room, and two adjoining class-rooms, where an ample collation was handsomely served, after the blessing had been asked by President Noah Porter of Yale College. To the Chairman of the Prudential Committee, Mr. George Kellogg, and the many ladies who so kindly assisted his efforts, all were indebted for the very thoughtful and complete provi- sion for their comfort and enjoyment. The chapel was again well filled by those who reassembled to enjoy the exercises of the afternoon, which were happily conducted by Professor Lewellyn Pratt, in place of Rev. Dr. Henry M. Field, who had accepted the invitation to pre- side, but was unable to be present. The paper presented by Rev. John H. Goodell of Windsor Locks, on " The Biblical Teaching of the Seminary its Dis- tinctive Feature," was listened to with marked interest as a contribution of permanent value to the Institution. From a large number of letters received by the committee from the alumni and other friends, Rev. W. S. Hawkes of South Hadley Falls, Mass., read carefully selected and copious extracts, which were heard with evident pleasure by all, and with personal interest by many. These reminiscences pre- sented a varied and graphic picture of the successive periods of seminary life, as seen from within, which will be treasured in printed form by many more than those who heard their recital. " Several carefully prepared impromptu addresses " were then announced by the chairman. The first to respond was Rev. Dr. Gushing Eells of the class of '37, who told the thrilling story of his missionary life and labors in Oregon and Washington Territories during the past forty-five years of service. In his allusion to his inti- mate relation with the martyred Dr. Whitman, in the early history of the great Northwest, he became truly " the old man eloquent." Upon his retirement, the fact was related that while thus engaged in missionary work amid the hardships of frontier life, he and his wife had earned and given to the cause of Christian education over fifteen thousand dollars. Rev. Francis Williams of the class of '41, spoke face- 8 tiously of the social life at East Windsor Hill when he was a student there. President Porter of Yale presented the salutations of that sister seminary, with many bright and interesting allusions to the past and present relations between the two institutions. Rev. Graham Taylor of Hartford, referred to the indebted- ness of the city pastors for the library privileges so freely granted them at Hosmer Hall. He alluded to the deep obli- gation felt by many of the city churches for the valuable assistance rendered by the students in their Sunday-schools and prayer-meetings. The appreciation of their presence and services by people and pastors is very apparent each year, in the many ways in which, he assured them, their absence is felt. On behalf of the " Pastors' Mission/' he thanked the students, especially for the noble response they had made to the appeal for their aid in conducting evangelistic services in the most destitute parts of the city. Nearly all of them had volunteered service. The unfailing regularity with which they had met their appointments, and the spirit and effi- ciency with which they had done " the work of an evange- list," not only in the services, but in thoroughly canvass- ing whole sections of the city, and in calling as opportu- nity invited from house to house, deserved a public recognition as hearty as the personal appreciation it had received from all directly associated with them in the work. The varied programme of the afternoon was brought to a close by the reading of a poem entitled " The Survival of the Axe," prepared for the occasion by Rev. Theron Brown, of the class of 1859, a Baptist clergyman of Norwood, Mass. The play of its feeling, humorous and earnest, met with appre- ciative response from his amused and interested auditors. The commemorative services of the day were fittingly closed with the concert of the " Hosmer Hall Choral Union," in the Asylum Hill Congregational Church, in the evening, under the direction of Associate-Professor "Waldo S. Pratt, with a chorus numbering one hundred and seventy-five voices, including almost all the seminary students, and with the assistance of soloists and orchestra from abroad, the Union rendered Handel's Oratorio, " The Messiah." The audience completely filled the spacious edifice, and included the alumni and guests of the Seminary, to all whom complimentary admission was tendered by the generosity of the Trustees. The public indebtedness to the Seminary for the eminent character of the performance was well expressed in the following hearty recognition by the Hartford "Courant": " It is so long since the Messiah was given in this city that the public owes a debt to the Choral Union for giving it, and a double debt for giving it so well as was done last evening. Some of the obligation must extend over to the Theological Seminary, since it is largely through it that the performance became possible. It not only furnishes a considerable share of the singers, but has given place for rehearsal, furnished the director, and done very much more, directly and indirectly, to wards, developing and strengthening the Union. Without the Seminary it would hardly have come into existence, and certainly would not have had so good an opportunity for development into an enthusiastic society with a high aim and a better conception of the purpose of music of the highest order than has yet existed here. Each of the performances given since the initial one has shown a marked advance, and this last was no exception to the established rule. " When from a body chosen mainly out of those who have an enthusiasm for study arid practice, such admirable results can come, as were produced last evening, it evidences very remarkable ability on the part of the instructor. Those who have often heard the Messiah, and compare the rendering of the choruses last evening with those of the Handel and Haydn Society of Boston, the Sacred Harmonic Society of London, and similar organizations, must confess that while, of course, weak in the grand effects, there was not simply a precision, a technical mastery of difficulties, but better still, an intelligence of comprehension and a poetry of execution which are almost never surpassed. It was not simple earnestness, but there 2 10 was a delicacy of shading, a studious force of contrasts, a breadth- of style which showed the most careful study of the piece, viewed as a great religious work. In a word, it was given in a manner quite in keeping with the Institution under whose auspices it was performed. These qualities were so uniformly displayed that it is not necessary to select instances. Of course, with a chorus of less than two hundred, with a small orchestra, and an organ not of first magnitude, the thrilling effects produced by numbers cannot be gained ; but it may be said that the ' Hallelujah ' and the closing chorus, 1 Worthy is the Lamb,' were a surprise to all in their massive and stirring power. But all had been equally studied, and revealed in the details the supervision of a skilled director, and the most painstaking practice. The impression made upon the crowded audience was one of surprise, pleasure, and satis- faction." The annual devotional service, held on Thursday morn- ing, was more largely attended than usual, and most appro- priately conducted by Rev. H. C. Alvord. Brethren widely sundered for years found the hour of spiritual fellowship most delightful and refreshing. The afternoon was d'evoted to the annual meeting of the Pastoral Union, whose business proceedings, reported in the Appendix, were enlivened by a thrilling address of congratu- lation and sympathy, by Rev. Dr. E. B. Webb of Boston, who succeeded this year to the Presidency of the Board of Trustees. The closing exercises in the evening were very largely attended. Rev. Dr. A. J. F. Behrends of Brooklyn, delivered the last lecture in the Carew course on " The Relation of the Mind of Man to the Revelation of God." His profoundly philosophical treatment of the theme was designed to demon- strate the capacity of man's mind to receive, respond to, and interpret the revealed thought of God. The memorable series of services was concluded by the eminently appropriate and practical address of Rev. Pro- fessor Riddle to the graduating class, which is the fitting con- clusion to this Memorial volume. ADDRESSES AND LETTERS. Address of Welcome. BY ROWLAND SWIFT, ESQ. Mr. President, Alumni, and friends: As one looks about him here, just now, there is something in the very motion and composure of this gathered company that is suggestive of the season of reunion and repast for kindred hearts. I am sure that something of the old-time spirit of the Pilgrims' Jubilee, grave indeed, but fervid too and even exuberant, is abroad in the assembly and moving upon the surface and through the depths of it. A narrative of early colonial times tells of the reward to public and united prayers, when the rains saved the shrivel- ing crops : " Having these many signs of God's favor and acception we thought it would be great ingratitude if, secretly, we should smother up the same or content our- selves with private thanksgiving for that which by private prayer could not be obtained." Cotton Mather recorded the information that Mr. Eliot taught his Indian converts "to set apart their days for both fasting and prayer and for feasting and prayer," and that they, the devout Indians, " performed the duties of those days with a very laborious piety." I hope we shall do as well as they, with less fatigue and possibly as appropriately; but it is our turn to-day to celebrate; it is our calling to rejoice and give thanks, not secretly, at the manifold things of divine bestowal which we have received. The committee have honored me with a request that I should say a few words for them at this stage of your proceed- ings. I wish, at the same time, that what I have to offer, so very briefly as will be necessary, may be commended to your 12 acceptance as the hearty greeting of a citizen of Hartford, for I cannot avoid associating, in a manner, events which we celebrate in this presence, with others inevitably to be recalled to mind as we go on, and which are happily so much in harmony with this occasion. I assume, as a fact, that this memorial service to which you have been invited, commemo- rates one of the accomplishments which is fairly illustrative of the old-time character of our Christian citizenship its loyalty, its wisdom, and its piety. I presume you will not forget that probably before ever a kernel of wheat was sown upon these hills or even a furrow had been traced across the virgin intervals, our provident forefathers had hewed and planted and covered in the beams of their little sanctuary. The colony was still very young when Hopkins, first the merchant citizen, then the chief magistrate, had set apart a significant portion of his estate by will, " to give some encouragement for the breeding up of hopeful youths both at the grammar school and college, for the public service of the country in future times," supplementing this first provision by another, as he so positively set forth, " in further prosecution of the aforesaid public ends, which, in the simplicity of my heart, are for the upholding and promoting the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ in those parts of the earth." It is assuring to remind ourselves how the land was possessed, and how orderly and characteristic was the progress of Christian enterprise. A city that began, well back in the last century, to gather its public libraries, and to multiply its churches; where, from common school to college, seminaries of learning have increased as rapidly as riches ; where, in due time, were planted homes for the orphan, retreat for the insane, asylum and training-school for the deaf and dumb, reformatories for the inebriate, hospitals for the sick and injured, houses of refuge for the aged and infirm, and numerous other distinctively Christian enterprises, to this day doing their beneficent and sacred work Hartford, at the appointed time, not lacking a citizenship equal to the oppor- tunity, after thoughtful observation and deliberation, of course 13 adopted this consecrated school. It was like Hartford to do it ; to do it in a way that should bring to record that measured decision that goes with purpose and faith ; and if you would see a chart of the willing mind that is accepted according to what a man hath and not according to what he hath not, look over, some day, the lists of saintly donors enrolled upon the old subscription books. She who cast in of her living has written her name there, and the well-to-do men of the time have honored the page and their names and their city by varying and increasing and noble gifts. Here the renovated institution was not out of place. New associations were and are felicitous, and you who, to-day, return here for the first time, find yourselves here at home, and we together, citizens and alumni, may reverently give thanks for what we see not only within these walls, but for the legacy of unnumbered names ever to be remembered with Hopkins's and Wadsworth's and Watkinson's and Gallaudet's and Hosmer's, because of their co-operation in those benefi- cent projects which best adorn our neighboring landscapes, and most significantly characterize our civilization. With the close of our half century we would gladly have welcomed full numbers to our golden festival. A timely summons, as hopefully importunate as could be framed, went abroad to every name upon your rolls of survivors. Many are marked " not present " this morning, yet it will seem so often, while you are together, as if they were very near and verily of your company ! I have been told that on the shores of the Adriatic, there may be heard, at nightfall of almost any day, the sweet snatches of song that are sent out by waiting mothers and children who expect, through the deepening shadows, the return of husband or brother. From afar out upon the waters, responding strains are heard at last, and though distant and but faintly to be heard, how do they reward and animate the heart of loving wife and child ! They sing to and fro from beach to boat as the tired but blessed fishermen are guided to their rock and to their home ! In the mountains of the Tyrol, too, they say such another call 14 rises, at the cottage-doors of the shepherds, from those who love them and who come out at sunset and listen, sometimes long, for the answering music that shall tell them that, from the pastures where they find verdure and danger, the herdsman, though belated, is corning homeward with all his flock. The song that flies from cot to cliff, and from cliff to cot, ceases never until man and herd are brought safely to home and rest. In such expressive sympathy will you find yourselves with your absent brethren, when in due course you hear from them by and bye. Our overtures that were sent across the seas brought 'responses that thrill the heart like a heroic song. They seem to say : " We have cast our net on the other side of the ship. We shall find. The master said so. It is filling ; we cannot leave it till we bring it safe, unbroken to the land ! " From the mountains of the west others sent answers of regret, but so praiseful that their cheer comes very close home. " Thank God for our ninety-and-nine. We seek those that remain, that have been given to us ; when they are found it will not be long we will come home ; then, friends, we will have rest, and rejoice together." But I am not unmind- ful how the time speeds on to-day. The fervent grip of your hands with one another has already had its spell, and the irrepressible interchange of news and assurance, a longer charm. So the Anniversary will quickly weave its shining golden thread across and through the texture of the onward extending life. God bless you, friends, and give you cheer when you must go again from the restful holiday to the waiting field, but a brimful, New England Thanksgiving welcome to you while you stay! Historical Address. BY PROFESSOR WILLIAM THOMPSON. To some who favor us with their presence this morning, the establishment and early fortunes of the Theological Insti- tute of Connecticut are a familiar story. They were old enough in 1834 to read and hear what was said, and done by its advocates and opponents. They have not been indifferent observers of its ongoings from one decade to another. But of the men who started the enterprise, and of its singular experiences, few of you retain from personal knowledge a clear impression. The survey now proposed is chiefly for a younger class of hearers, more or less curious to learn how the Seminary fared while it remained at East Windsor Hill. " New England Theology " is an ambiguous phrase. The varieties of belief denoted by this term at different periods have always been spoken of with special reference .to Congre- gationalists. Before the time of Pres. Edwards, New England divines held the Calvinistic views embodied substantially in Willard's Lectures on the Assembly's Catechism. Whatever modifications of theological belief were afterwards adopted, the system remained essentially the same, and it has long been customary to name as its chief expounders and advocates in the last century Edwards, Bellamy, and Dwight. Its more recent representatives in New England were Woods and Tyler. The views held by these writers differ but little from those embodied in the creeds of New England churches from the earliest period in their history to a very recent day. They are sometimes designated as " Old Calvinism," sometimes " Old School Theology." The tenets set fortli by a class of theologians claiming to bo " consistent Calvinists," led by Drs. Eiimioiis and Hopkins, 16 have been styled in some quarters " New England Theology." But what these eminent divines taught as " improvements " on the doctrinal system long accepted among us never gained a currency sufficiently wide to justify this title. More recently the speculations of Dr. Nathaniel "W". Taylor and his associates have been known to a moderate extent by the same name. They are more properly known as the " New Divinity of New England," or "New Haven Divinity." In the year 1822 the Theological Department of Yale College was Organized in its present form, and Dr. Nathaniel W. Taylor was appointed professor. The founder of his profes- sorship required that as a condition of holding office the incumbent sliould give his assent to the Saybrook Platform, the doctrinal part of which instrument is in full accord with the Assembly's Catechism. It was the accredited formula of a large proportion of the Congregational churches in New England. Not long after the inauguration of Dr. Taylor it became known to some of his intimate ministerial friends, of whom Dr. Nettleton was one, that he held theories and speculations not in agreement with the acknowledged standards of ortho- doxy. In his Concio ad Clerum, preached Sept. 10, 1828, sen- timents and hypotheses were avowed which awakened wide- spread anxiety. Two years before this Prof. Fitch preached a sermon on " Sin," which was generally considered as antagonistic to evangelical doctrine. Various attempts were made to prevent open controversy, but they proved futile. Personal expostulation, correspondence, conferences of repre- sentative men, all failed to quiet the rising agitation or restrain the New Haven divines from advocating their senti- ments through the press. The tenets of Dr. Taylor which created disquietude, it is believed, may be fairly stated as follows : First. God could not have prevented all sin in a moral system. Second. Mankind came into the world with the same nature in kind as that with which Adam was created, and the 17 fact that his posterity uniformly sin is due to the circum- stances in which they are placed. Third. Self-love is the primary cause of all moral action. The exact form of the thesis was in these words : " Of all spe- cific voluntary action the happiness of the agent, in some form, is the ultimate end." Fourth. Antecedent to regeneration the selfish principle is suspended in the sinner's heart, so that he ceases to sin and uses the means of regeneration with motives that are neither sinful nor holy. In the leading religious quarterly of New England at that time, the Christian Spectator, these dogmas were set forth with great earnestness, eloquence, and skill by eminent divines, who shared the prestige of our chief literary institution, and of the general respect and confidence won by their eminent attainments and services. To protest publicly against the sentiments avowed by such writers, holding exalted positions and assured of powerful support, was a step from which min- isters of the gospel and intelligent laymen naturally recoiled. But there seemed to be no option. Individual remonstrances and entreaties had failed to prevent the wide dissemination of theological sentiments believed by many to be fraught with incalculable mischief. This apprehension of danger was deeply felt by Jeremiah Evarts, Glov. John Cotton Smith, Drs. Tyler, Nettleton, Humphrey, Griffin, Ebenezer Porter, Woods, and other leading men in New England and in various quarters. If any persons were competent to estimate correctly the difference between the New Haven Theology and what the Congregational churches and ministers of New England generally and firmly believed to be the teachings of the Divine Word, they were found among those who struck the first note of alarm. The more thoroughly the New Haven Divinity was examined, the more clearly it appeared to be antagonistic to biblical views of the divine government, human depravity, regeneration, and the essential difference between the motives that govern renewed and unrenewed men. Perhaps the time has not yet come for an impartial 3 18 judgment on the merits of the controversy and the spirit in which it was conducted. With some confidence, however, an unbiased inquirer may be referred to what was written at the most exciting stage of the discussion by Drs. Dow, Nettleton, Tyler, and Woods, as seldom marred by asperity or unfair- ness. Such a reader would not fail of seeing that these men were profoundly moved in view of doctrinal innovations imperiling the purity of revivals and the spiritual vigor of the churches. No branch of the new divinity awakened more general fear and regret than what was currently styled at the time " Re- generation by self-love." Near the fatal close of his long illness Dr. Nettleton was visited by his old ministerial friend, the acknowledged leader of the new movement, with whose views he had been sorely grieved. Shortly after the inter- view he wrote to his distinguished visitor, concluding his letter as follows : "I would cherish the hope that your own religious experience is at variance with some things which you have published ; particularly on the subject of self-love, and the great doctrine of regeneration. It does seem to me I experienced all which you make essential to regeneration, while, as I now fully believe, my heart was unreconciled to God. And this is the reason that leads me to fear that what you have written will be the means of deceiving and destroy- ing souls. I say this with the kindest feelings and with eternity in view. Receive it as my dying testimony and as an expression of my sincere love." With such positive convictions respecting the views persist- ently advocated in high places as " great improvements " on the old theology thirty-six Connecticut Congregational minis- ters met in convention at East (now South) Windsor, Sept. 10, 1833, " for the purpose of consultation and taking such measures as may be deemed expedient for the defense and promotion of evangelical principles." The sessions were held in a small ancient brick school-house about half a mile north of the present Congregational church. The more prominent members of the body were Drs. Samuel Spring, Asahel Nettleton, Nathaniel Hewitt, Daniel Dow, G. A. Calhoun, 19 Joseph Harvey, and Kev. Cyrus Yale. Only three of the thirty-six delegates are now living. The two days in that secluded brick school-house devoted to prayerful deliberation were marked by the absence of party-spirit and unmistakable tokens of the divine presence. The result was the organiza- tion of the Conn. Pastoral Union, and shortly after the Theo- logical Institute of Connecticut. At a session of the Legis- lature in the ensuing spring an act of incorporation was obtained, allowing the trustees to hold property to the amount of fifty thousand dollars. Upon the petition of the trustees in 1859 the charter was so amended that the Insti- tute could hold any real or personal estate, provided the annual income thereof should not exceed twelve thousand dollars. The location of the Seminary at East Windsor was chiefly due to the generous aid proffered by Mr. Erastus Ellsworth, who had recently retired to that town after a prosperous business career in New York. If other friends have made larger donations to the Institute, no one is better entitled to be called its foster-father. In its early days of weakness and subsequent perils Erastus Ellsworth promptly responded to every call that taxed his purse, time, patience, or capacity as a man of affairs. On the 13th of May, 1834, the corner- stone of the seminary edifice was laid by the venerable Dr. Perkins of West Hartford, and two professors were inducted into office : Dr. Bennett Tyler, Professor of Theology, and Dr. Jonathan Cogswell, Professor of Sacred History. During the previous winter fifteen students had received instruction from Dr. Tyler. On the 14th of the following October the Professor of Biblical Literature entered on his duties. The regular course of instruction now began, sixteen students being in attendance. Two stories of the seminary building were ready for use, and about two thousand volumes, chiefly given by Connecticut pastors, had been placed on the shelves of the library. In their first report to the Pastoral Union the trustees advert to the " prayerful solicitude and trembling hope " with which the resolution was adopted " under an imperious sense 20 of duty to the Great Head of the Church and implicit reli- ance upon his blessing, to proceed to the establishment of a new seminary for the education of young men for the gospel ministry." With limited means and under great discourage- ments the guardians of the young enterprise found their first year's experience fitted to " excite their gratitude and animate their hopes." " The increasing confidence and favor of the Christian public " was noted with special gratification. The whole amount of subscriptions to May 1st, 1835, was thirty- three thousand seven hundred thirty-three dollars. The largest donation was that of $1,250 from Mr. David N. Lord of the city of New York. A large proportion of the gifts by which the current expenses of the Institute were met du ring- its first years was in small sums by persons of moderate means. For a time the trustees judged that when the cost of buildings had been defrayed an income of $3,000 annually would be sufficient, and that it would be better to obtain this sum by yearly subscriptions than to aim at permanent endow- ments. Could any one expect that the establishment of a second theological seminary in Connecticut would escape hostile crit- icism ? In the fall of 1834 the theological Professors of Yale College published a statement denying that any good reason could be assigned for the new enterprise. This called out an " Appeal to the Public in behalf of the Institute." The trustees defended their action on the ground that the theo- logical school at New Haven was under the entire control of a corporation, nearly one-half of whose members are such men as one political party or another happens to choose for State officers. By a change in recent years the alumni choose six members of the corporation. It is not apparent that this measure increases the security of the Theological Department. Reference w T as also made by our trustees to the feeling of insecurity awakened among the churches by the disclosure of the fact that three of the Professors in the New Haven Semin- ary were not required to give their assent to any confession of faith. % The Professor of Theology was indeed bound to declare " his free assent to the Confession of Faith arid Eccle- 21 siastical Discipline agreed upon by the Churches of this State in the year 1708." This refers to the Saybrook Platform, which in doctrine is identical with the Assembly's Catechism. But, to the surprise of the public, it was now announced that Dr. Taylor " had certain knowledge, from personal inter- course with the founders (of his professorship), that if he had embraced every minute doctrine of the Confession it would have been considered a decisive disqualification for the office." Consequently it was claimed that, while the Professor of The- ology held and taught doctrines at variance with the creed, he could not be impeached, because his assent had been given only for substance of doctrine. A still more weighty reason for their action was assigned by our trustees. It was the deep and wide-spread dissatisfaction produced by the publication and defense of the New Haven views. These have been already stated. A subordinate motive for organizing a new seminary was the growing demand for more adequate physical exercise by candidates for the sacred office. Extended investigations had lately shown that an alarming percentage, fully one-half, of those who deserve the character of close students, injured themselves by neglect of bodily exercise. An early grave or chronic weakness and disease were the penalty to be expected in the case of many promising aspirants for the ministry. To check this fearful loss of consecrated talent it was resolved to provide ample means for manual labor in the new school of the prophets. The prejudices of many good people were roused against the. Institute by the persistent accusation that it was divisive in its aims and spirit, and foretokened the breaking up of existing ecclesiastical relations in this state. The answer was that no such purpose was entertained. It was said : u While we concede to our brethren who differ from us the right to think for themselves and to inculcate their own opin- ions, we ask them to allow us the same privilege. To say that the founders of the Seminary had a right to form and publicly avow their own religious principles ; to say that they had a right to consecrate a portion of their property to the 9O defense and diffusion of these principles, and to guard the sacred deposit against perversion as they have done in their statutes, is only to claim in their behalf a participation in the privileges common to every protestant and to every citizen of a free country." One individual who was active in the forma- tion of the Pastoral Union and in measures immediately fol- lowing did indeed favor a radical policy. No one, however, seconded his proposal to withdraw fellowship from the New School brethren. The intimate friends of Dr. Joseph Harvey could not have been surprised by his advocacy of an extreme measure. Excelled by few men in personal attractions, an able preacher and polemic, he inherited a morbid, nervous organi- zation, that often taxed the patience of his friends, and best explains certain intellectual caprices that made him a doubtful coadjutor in any undertaking. At an early day he suddenly ceased to cooperate with the Pastoral Union and connected himself with the Presbyterian Church. It has been well said that " earnestness and fidelity to con- victions everywhere carry a cross.'' The men who conscien- tiously identified themselves with the Institute in its early days were well aware of the grave difficulties surrounding the enterprise. With few exceptions the press was either adverse or indifferent. Without a periodical to repel calumnious mis- representations the trustees and faculty for the most part suf- fered in silence under the scourge of unscrupulous tongues and pens. The seclusion and incongenial surroundings of the Seminary, its moderate equipment in funds, books, teachers, and constituency offered abundant material to unfriendly critics. Their opportunity to prejudice the public mind was not lost. If a candidate for the gospel ministry set his face towards East Windsor, he did not fail to encounter warnings and dis- suasives to which young men are keenly alive. That the number of students, compared with older seminaries, contin- ued to be small was not surprising. That within the first few years thirty-four were in attendance was justly and devoutly recognized as a special token of divine favor. So also was their continuance, with so few exceptions, till the end of the course, in view of the odium that lessened their chance for a 23 fair start in life. An early graduate after a long interval thus adverts to his experience : " Our numbers all told were few, and class distinctions, however informal and loosely held, narrowed still more the area of our restricted intimacies. Most of us were fresh from our large college associations with their varied excitements, and we found it hard to settle our- selves down into the narrow grooves in which our seminary life seemed to drag itself along. And the outside neighbor- hood was nearly as contracted as the Seminary. The families that cared for an acquaintance, though cultured and hospita- ble, were still infrequent and scattered. Both from within and from without a pressure was put upon us sometimes annoying and always troublesome. We were young men with aspirations for usefulness and ambitious of success. We were desirous to know and obey the truth, but at the same time did not want, if we could help it, to be put without the pale of popular sympathy and support." Gradually, as one small class after another came before ecclesiastical bodies for license or ordination, popular prejudice subsided. Judged by its average pupils it appeared that the Seminary w r as not belligerent, but contented itself with teaching the same evan- gelical truths that had long been the strength and inspiration of New England Congregational churches. The limited views of our first Board of trustees were illus- trated in two particulars. Instead of planning at the outset for a library that any competent judge would deem suitable for a public institution, they seemed to regard a few thousand volumes, chiefly such as could be spared from a pastor's study, as sufficient. The w r ant of standard works in every depart- ment was a continued source of lamentation. In 1836, through the influence of Dr. John Todd, then pastor in Gro- ton, Mass., one thousand dollars from the estate of Deacon Stone of Townshend was appropriated to the increase of the library. Not long after Mr. Abrier Kingman of Boston Highlands, in gratitude that his pastor decided not to accept a professorship tendered him by the trustees of the Institute, made a handsome donation of carefully selected books neatly bound. Besides these gifts the trustees expended less than 24 fifteen hundred dollars on the library during the thirty years prior to our leaving East Windsor Hill. The dreary record of three thousand volumes had indeed been changed to that of seven thousand before we came to Hartford. Of the fifty dollars allowed the librarian as his salary for forty-five years twenty-five dollars went to his assistant. Another sample of the humble standard with which the trustees were at first content may be seen in the annual income judged sufficient when the necessary buildings and other fixed property were paid for. In successive reports they expressed the opinion that three thousand dollars would defray current expenses. In partial justification of this estimate it should be known that one professor, who had received a handsome legacy from a rich brother in New York, served the institution gratuitously, and the salary of the youngest professor was six hundred and fifty dollars, exclusive of house rent. By some influential members of the board permanent funds were looked upon with distrust. Had they not in many cases been perverted ? Are they not always a prize coveted by men seeking an easy position, and under little restraint from the obligations of creeds and the wills of deceased benefactors ? " Let us shun this danger," said these good men. " We will rely on the annual gifts of those whose hearts are with us. Some of our own number will take short agencies, keeping the churches informed of our work, and thankfully accepting the smallest contributions." On a scale of three thousand dollars a year the plan seemed feasible. Its chief merit lay in securing from godly persons the prayers and sympathies not less helpful than their donations. The first year of the experiment was successful. Three hundred and twenty-eight subscribers were reported. The smallest sum in the list was fourteen cents, and the largest seven hundred and fifty dollars. Subscriptions were solicited chiefly in this state and in the city of New York. In the year 1839 a legacy of eleven thousand dollars was received from the estate of Miss Rebecca Waldo, of Worces- ter, Mass. This gift, by far the largest that had yet come into the treasury, was hailed with peculiar joy. Wide-spread commercial disasters had not long before crippled a number 25 of our patrons, and the collection of three thousand dollars in small sums had already become a difficult task. From that time little was openly said against permanent endowments. Before a second professorship was in this way provided for, the moral support previously derived from Christian people in the humble walks of life sensibly declined. The annual subscribers numbering 328 in 1835 dropped down to seven in the year 1859. Besides the one thousand dollars appropriated to the library by the trustees of Dea. Stone's estate in 1837, some years later Mr. Richard Bond of Boston Highlands bequeathed to the Institute seven thousand dollars, of which four thousand dollars were to be appropriated for the purchase of books. Besides the benefit of his professional services with- out compensation the Seminary received from Dr. Cogswell one thousand dollars towards the endowment of a Professorship of Ecclesiastical History, also liberal aid from time to time for the relief of needy students. At an early period in our history two thousand dollars were bequeathed to the Institute by Mr. Alva Oilman of Hartford. The joint bequest of the three Misses Waldo of Worcester, Mass., amounted to four- teen thousand dollars, and were set apart for the support of a Professor of Ecclesiastical History. The second professorship placed upon a stable foundation was that of Christian Theology, by the bequest of Mr. Chester Buckley and his wife of Wethersfield. To the late Hon. Seth Terry the Institute is deeply indebted for the patience, tact, and legal experience, gratuitously employed in success- fully thwarting an attempt to set aside the wills of Mr. and Mrs. Buckley. On becoming satisfied, after consulting the best legal authorities, that the validity of the wills was seriously endangered by a technical flaw, Judge Terry planned a compromise securing to the Seminary and variqus benevo- lent institutions a large proportion of the bequests named in the wills, and to the heirs-at-law a considerable amount in advance of what would have fallen to them by the terms of of the instrument in debate. The last of the three endow- 4 26 merits furnished before the removal to Hartford came in part from the estate of the Rev. Dr. Asahel Nettleton. Besides a bequest for the support of the Professor of Bible Literature Dr. Nettleton left five hundred dollars for the purchase of periodicals, and whatever should be realized from the sales of Village Hymns for the benefit of indigent students. By a providential interposition the instrument bequeathing a por- tion of his property to charitable objects was preserved and its provisions executed. Grateful mention should be made of the assistance afforded our young brethren by yearly grants from the Hale Donation and the Everest Fund. From the former source between two and three hundred dollars, and from the latter at least fifty dollars, have been annually applied for this purpose. By means of scholarships a succession of young men have been helped on their way to the sacred office. Of these charitable foundations six were furnished before we came to Hartford and sixteen have been added since. The first in the series was the gift of Mr. Abner Kingman to perpetuate the memory of his respect and affection for Dr. Nehemiah Adams of Boston, and the second from the same liberal friend bearing the name of Eliot. The names of his bene- ficiaries were communicated from time to time to Mr. King- man, so that he could follow them into their home or foreign ' O fields. More than thirty years he had the satisfaction of seeing the fruit of this one species of his manifold beneficence. Our annals will faithfully transmit to coming generations the names of those whose gifts or services have made them prominent during the period just closed. But at least a word of grateful recognition is due to those self-sacrificing Christian women in Hartford and Tolland Counties, who ministered with patient toil, like Dorcas of old, to the wants of needy students from year to year. If unlike hers their names are unrecorded, they will have their reward. The manual labor department of the Seminary was planned chiefly for the promotion of physical health, but some antici- pated it would also yield pecuniary profit. Seventy acres of choice alluvial land, lying between the seminary buildings and Connecticut river, were purchased for tillage by students, 27 and agricultural implements were furnished without charge. One acre or less, as he might choose, was allowed each student. The scheme included the construction of a road through the center of the field to the river, where a wharf was to be built to facilitate the transportation of farm pro- ducts to this city. Operations began in the spring of 1834. The first gush of enthusiasm resulted in the construction of the road. A few, who had been accustomed to farm work in early youth, managed to keep in good health and earn enough to pay for a few text-books at the end of the season. As to the majority of the students, however, the outcome in respect both to health and profit was not altogether encouraging. In 1835 the net profit of work on land was two hundred and twelve dollars and seventy cents. In 1836, when the number of cultivators had increased, three hundred and eighty-three dollars and sixty-two cents were earned. The next year no estimate of proceeds was reported. Several drawbacks, not duly estimated at first, conspired to disappoint expectations from the agricultural branch of manual labor. As the soil became impoverished no provision was made for enriching it. Not unfrequently more time was required for necessary labor than fidelity to class-work would allow. As the terms of study were then arranged the summer vacation included one of the months when few crops can be wholly neglected without loss. Fortunately, as a home market was easily found for the products of the farm, no money was wasted on a wharf at the river. The fate of the workshop, intended for manual labor in cold and stormy weather, was even more disastrous. Each student was supplied with a box of tools, but with few exceptions the proper use of them was unknown to the young men. With no superintendent shop-tools rapidly depreciated in value, .little merchantable work was produced, and the end of the experiment was 'much the same as of a similar one at Andover. By their charter the trustees were authorized to establish a classical school as well as a theological seminary. Some of them were in favor of organizing it as early as 1836, but the majority declined taking any steps in that direction until 28 their main enterprise had obtained firm footing. In 1850 public sentiment called with earnestness for the organization of a first-class academy. It was found that a large percent- age of the pupils in the best training schools of Massachusetts were from Connecticut. There was evidently wanting among us a school sufficiently endowed to secure the services of well-qualified teachers, not dependent for support on tuition fees, and pledged to a high standard of scholarship irrespective of the number of pupils. This view was enter- tained by many who had no partiality for the East Windsor Institute. With the Pastoral Union and their associates the project found /avor because it promised eventually to strengthen the higher institution under their care. Not that academical pupils would pass directly into the seminary, but some of them after leaving college would be predisposed to take their professional course in the place to which they had become attached in former years. By some of us the pros- pect of a good training school at our door was hailed as a welcome boon. It would solve a hard problem. If our children were to enjoy any better advantages than were offered by the very inferior schools of the 'town, how could their expenses away from home be met from an income of $650 a year? In 1851 the trustees took measures for put- ting into operation a classical school to bear the name of East Windsor Hill Academy. They avowed their purpose to provide both thorough instruction in the various branches of study and in the great principles of Christian faith. The direct superintendence of the academy was placed in the hands of a committee, two members of which were to be from the theological faculty. Mr. Paul A. Chadbourne was chosen principal, with an excellent corps of assistant teachers. Fifty pupils were in attendance the first year. The Assembly's Catechism was recited -each w T eek, and constant care was exercised to secure the objects dearest to the hearts of Christian parents. To this feature of the academy grateful tributes were paid in after years by the graduates. When Dr. Chadbourne was called to a professorship in Williams College his place could not be easily filled; but during 29 the ten years of its existence the academy held to the purpose and pledge of its founders. Failing to obtain the funds required for the maintenance of its high standard, the trustees chose to discontinue the school rather than suffer its good name to be tarnished. Its graduates who entered our best colleges took a high rank, and keen disappointment was felt on all sides that pecuniary embarrassment had paralyzed a young training school in which centered so many hopes for the cause of accurate scholarship and high moral culture. Although opposition to the Theological Seminary had declined as its spirit, methods, and results became known to the Christian public, and its pecuniary resources had at length reached a respectable figure, yet at the end of twenty years its guardians and friends became somewhat anxious. From the first local embarrassments had not been a slight obstacle to its growth. Instead of becoming less they had seriously increased. Facilities of intercourse between East Windsor Hill and other places had lessened. Steamboats had ceased to ply between Hartford and Springfield. The daily stage had been withdrawn. The railroad was on the opposite side of the river. To take a train one must go eight miles to Hartford or six to Warehouse Point or three to Windsor with the uncertainties of a primitive ferry. To or from either of these points no regular conveyance was established, and to obtain a private carriage was at times attended with difficulty. Dr. Eli Smith, the distinguished missionary, on a visit to his native land had occasion to find his way to East Windsor Hill in prosecution of a matrimonial alliance. In Springfield he learned that the nearest station was at Wind- sor. Stopping there at twilight he was a long time busy in finding a vehicle to take him to the river, where fresh delays and perils awaited the veteran traveler. On reaching his destination, he remarked, that in his various explorations in Palestine and Armenia he had experienced some inconven- iences, but he never found it so difficult to get from one point to another as from Old Windsor to East Windsor Hill. Besides its isolation the seminary suffered from want of 30 social and spiritual vitality and a literary atmosphere so helpful to studious young men. From 1855 to 1860 the Institution passed through a trying ordeal. For reasons already adverted to in part its continued existence was debated by its stanchest friends. While the academy continued to flourish, such was the decline in the theological department of the Institute as to threaten at least its 'temporary suspension. To guard the funds in such an emergency became an object of solicitude with the Trustees. Under legal advice it was decided that, if one of the theo- logical professors should serve temporarily as principal of the school, the funds of the Institute would not be forfeited. Accordingly the Professor of Biblical Literature was requested to act in that capacity. This arrangement, involving no addition to the Professor's salary, was an economical one, as it saved to the treasury the amount otherwise required for the support of a principal. The proposal was accepted and several hours were daily spent in the academy without curtailing the time allotted to Hebrew and Greek in the other building. To instruct advanced classes fitting for college required of the teacher a review of the branches quite neglected for thirty years. This style of labor continued for two years. Meanwhile the trustees of the Institute invited the cor- porators of Yale College to consider an overture for uniting the two seminaries. The number of students in each was small and declining. The guardians of each were constrained to ask what could forestall the calamity that threatened both. The proposed conference took place between a committee of our trustees and the Prudential Committee and afterwards the Clerical Fellows of Yale College. On both sides, it would seem, the conference was candid and courteous. Our trustees signified to the other party " that they had in charge three sacred and inalienable trusts; their funds, their faith, and a school in which these funds should be devoted to the inculcation of their faith." They asked there- fore to be received into the united seminary in their complete and unrestrained integrity. It was proposed that the united school should be at New- Haven ; that the present professors 31 in both seminaries should retire, leaving all the chairs to be filled by a new election ; that the trustees of the Institute should nominate candidates and the Corporation should have power to elect, but only from among these nominees. These were the chief points. To all the specifications of the over- ture the New Haven gentlemen acceded, with one exception. They demurred as to the mode of appointing professors, and proposed as a substitute that a union be formed sub- stantially upon the basis already set forth, except that, instead of the trustees of the Pastoral Union nominating and the Corporation of the College electing the professors, the boards should constitute distinct and independent houses of convoca- tion, each electing, and that a concurrent election shall be necessary in each case to actual induction. While offering this as a basis of prospective union the New Haven gentle- men signified that a due regard to certain very obvious per- sonal relations and sympathies compelled them to ask a delay of definite action until such time as Providence should seem to indicate. After the conferences closed two of the Clerical Fel- lows of the Corporation signified that they should require some restriction upon the creed of the Pastoral Union if it was to be enforced in the united seminary. The attempt at union thus proving futile our board of trustees in 1856 sum- moned the friends of the Institute to " instant and earnest and assiduous endeavor and united prayer to God" for the increase of its efficiency. Only partial success, however, attended the efforts thus called forth. Local hindrances to the growth of the Seminary became more and more formidable from year to year. In the judgment of many its continued life depended upon its being transplanted to a more eligible home. Prominent trustees came to their annual meetings after 1857 with feelings little akin to a joyous reunion. Still the majority of the board were nothing, daunted by the untoward signs which were hailed with joy by those whose maxim from the first had been ; " Delenda est Carthago." How to effect an escape from our paralyzing environments and rekindle the languishing hopes of guardians and friends came to be an urgent problem. To leave East Windsor Hill 32 was to incur a considerable loss of property, to inflict a deep wound upon certain liberal and steadfast friends who could not listen to arguments in favor of a removal from the old site, and to run the risk of extinction elsewhere in circum- stances of mortifying publicity. In the early part of this transitional period of our history the infirmities of age compelled Dr. Tyler to ask a release from his official trusts. Before his resignation and to the O last day of his life his prevailing belief and hope were that the Institute would see brighter days. Occasionally, indeed, he yielded for a moment to a feeling of despondence and once or twice read at evening prayers in the chapel the hymn ; " By whom shall Jacob now arise, for Jacob's friends are few." Without warning and without the slightest justification anonymous charges against his doctrinal soundness were put in circulation just as he was leaving a post which he had honorably filled for more than twenty years. This bitter cup, it is supposed, was prepared by a few members of the Pastoral Union who had shared with him the burdens of an unpopular undertaking. Brooding over the misfortune which seemed to threaten the beloved Seminary they yielded to the suspicion that the Professor of Theology was the Achan that troubled the camp. At an informal trial which was forced upon the Pastoral Union the charges in question were thoroughly refuted and the way made clear for the venerable professor to retire with dignity and grace. In 1864 the Clerical Fellows of Yale College appointed a committee, of which the late Dr. Hawes was chairman, to confer with our trustees on the question of uniting the two seminaries. Since the abortive attempt in the same direction in 1856 such changes had taken place as awakened fresh hope that the measure might be consummated. But it was des- tined to a second and final defeat. The trustees of the Insti- tute had now resolved to remove it to Hartford " in order to open to it a wider field of usefulness and to confer upon it greater privileges." This step was agreed upon in spite of their disappointment in the efiort to raise a fund of two hun- dred thousand dollars, deemed necessary to meet the increased 33 outlay required by the proposed change. At the meeting of the Pastoral Union that year (1864) statements were made by ministerial brethren, from Massachusetts which favored an enlargement of our constituency beyond the bounds of the state of Connecticut. The brethren from a neighboring state expressed a desire to cooperate with us in checking the speculations of a false philosophy which had invaded the denomination, and which they deemed more alarming at that time than ever before. In consequence of the representations and appeals made at that juncture the Union passed several resolutions favoring an invitation to its membership of any Congregational pastors in sympathy with our theological senti- ments. Up to this time the Pastoral Union embraced few ministers not living in Connecticut. At present a considerable number from other states are enrolled among its members. The first accession from Massachusetts rendered much assist- ance in the removal to Hartford, but, subsequently less aid than was expected came from that particular band of allies. By more than one of their number it was confidently affirmed that, if a pastor in eastern Massachusetts were elected to a professor- ship in the Seminary, funds would be supplied from that quarter for his salary. The election was made but no funds came from " Boston and vicinity." To meet the embarrassment that ensued our steadfast patron, Mr. James B. Hosmer, gave fifty thousand dollars for the support of the new Massachu- setts Professor. That the receipts of the treasury might equal its expenditures Mr. Hosmer had been accustomed as treasurer to make good the annual deficits from his own resources, but in view of the circumstances this gift of fifty thousand dollars revealed a magnanimity of character not less worthy of record than the still larger donations reserved for a later day. While the Seminary was adjusting itself to its new surroundings schemes for its amalgamation with two western seminaries were set on foot. At the meeting of the National Council in Oberlin in 1871 an effort was made to enlist the moral support of that body in carrying out this pol- 34 icy. A series of resolutions was offered, one of which read as follows : " That we recognize thankfully the valuable ser- vice which the Theological Seminary at Hartford has done in the past and that we heartily commend its system of instruc- tion, but in view of the fact that two institutions of a similar character are no longer needed in close proximity to each other its consolidation with one of the western seminaries, if such a measure be practicable, would be viewed with satis- faction by our churches, and would, we believe, greatly enlarge its sphere of usefulness." From another western institution a proposal was made to receive us, doctrines, funds, teachers and all. From still another quarter came indefinite overtures of the same kind. Certainly the proposed method of dis- patching a troublesome life was more adroit, if it proved no more successful, than the somewhat violent one encountered in its infancy. Its persistence, however, and symptoms of fresh vigor in its new home were accepted at length as provi- dential signs that it had a mission of fts own this side the Allegheny Mountains. The sixth and last attempt to put an end to the independent existence of the Institute took the form of an anonymous pamphlet entitled, " Can it be done?" E"o intelligent reader of the document could doubt its author- ship or the plausibility of its reasoning. In point of time it had the advantage of appearing while we occupied hired dwelling houses on Prospect Street, not altogether adapted to our use, and suggestive of a second migration. The dis- tinguished writer of the missive sent it to each Congregational minister in Connecticut, not, he says, " with any purpose of introducing a public discussion of the subject or expecting that its suggestions would be at once unanimously approved, but % with the hope that in due season they would bear some fruit." The chief obstacle which he foresaw in the way of merging our Seminary in that at New Haven lay in the sub- scription to our creed, but he fondly hoped that a rigorous exactness would not be insisted upon, so that the formulary could be adopted by all who recognize in a general way the doctrines common to the various Protestant confessions. He 35 presents the form of a compact intended to secure the rights and endowments of both institutions. MY COLLEAGUES. At first and for several years there were but three profes- sors. Dr. Tyler was a graduate of Yale College, studied his profession with Rev. Asahel Hooker of Goshen, and was pastor in Middlebury, Conn., till called to the presidency of Dart- mouth College. On resigning that post he succeeded Dr. Edward Payson as pastor at Portland, and in 1834 was chosen Professor of Theology in our seminary. His literary and professional attainments were about the same as those of Dr. Ebenezer Porter of Andover, Dr. Humphrey, President of Arnherst College, and Dr. Lyman Beecher. Our records speak none too highly of his great worth and valuable services. His clear, logical method in argument, "his sound judgment, his love of the great doctrines of the Gospel, his eminent ability to teach and defend them, his warm, devoted, and uniform piety, the generosity of his heart, and the urbanity of his manner, admirably qualified him for his office." It was well said that " the success of the Institute in its early strug- gles was in no small measure to be ascribed under God to his hopeful spirit, his unwavering faith, his firmness and courage, his untiring and unselfish efforts." I labored with him as a son with a father from 1834 to 1858. The native kindness of his disposition, his self-control and practical wisdom made him a delightful companion, while he was facile princeps among the guardians and teachers of the Seminary. Dr. Jonathan Cogswell, our first Professor of Ecclesiastical History, was graduated at Harvard College, preached some years in Saco, Maine, and when the Institute was founded, was pastor of the First Church in New Britain. A legacy from his brother in New York enabled him to tender his services to the trustees without cost to the Seminary. His generosity and good nature checked the adverse criticisms to which his professional services were sometimes liable. From its commencement Dr. Asahel Nettleton held a semi- official relation to the Institute. Owing to precarious health 36 he spent the winter months in Virginia, where he had labored in revivals with signal success. As an inmate of my family for several months, always considerate of the feelings and welfare of those about him, by the serenity of his countenance, his animated and instructive conversation, and by his entire deportment, so humble, gentle, and in every way magnetic, he won our profound respect and ardent affection. In spite of the deep sand through which the road lay from Hartford to East Windsor Hill many an old friend found his way to Dr. Nettle- ton's residence to renew personal friendships or to confer with him relative to the kingdom of Christ. At the time when he was attacked by the malady of which he died after protracted sufferings, he was living with his brother -a short distance from the Seminary. His familiar lectures to the students on revivals so long as he was able to meet them, as well as his occasional sermons in the Chapel, were highly valued. Students of that day will never forget his visits at their rooms for conversation on spiritual themes usually closing with prayer. With the avails of Village Hymns he had bought a house and farm at East Windsor Hill for the use of an indigent brother with whom he planned to spend the evening of life. Almost daily visits for more than a year, and at least a score of nights of watching at his bedside, justify the testimony now given, that neither racking pains nor nameless social trials, from which a sensitive nature shrinks, extorted from his lips a word of complaint. In the last fiery ordeal the Christian graces, so conspicuous in the prime of his public life, shone with unwonted lustre. Dr. Nahum Gale, who succeeded Dr. Cogswell in the chair of Ecclesiastical History, was much younger than either of my other colleagues. He had been at the Institute as a pupil, and came to his office from a thriving pastorate in Ware, Mass. After two or three years Professor Gale became doubtful of the continuance of the Seminary and accepted an invitation to settle as pastor of the Church in Lee, Mass., where he labored successfully till his death. In 1844 Dr. Edward Hooker, then pastor in Bennington, Vt., was elected Professor of Homiletics and Pastoral Duty, 37 and continued in office four years. He was a greatgrandson of President Edwards, and a son of Rev. Asahel Hooker of Goshen, with whom Dr. Tyler and other useful ministers had studied theology near the beginning of the present century, before the Seminary at Andover was founded. The families of Drs. Tyler and Hooker formed a group exceptionally amiable and refined. Dr. Hooker enjoyed the respect and affectionate sympathy of his brethren and pupils in his labors and repeated afflictions. He served with conscientious fidelity in his appointed sphere, but his partiality for the pastoral office led to his resignation at the end of four years. Our third Professor of Church History was Rev. Dr. Edward A. Lawrence. Since his recent death his talents, scholarship, and character have called out warm and discrimi- nating eulogies from those who knew little of his work with us. Before he came to the Seminary and during the twenty years after he withdrew from it he impressed all who knew him with the accuracy, thoroughness, and extent of his knowl- edge, the firmness of his convictions, his courtesy, fairness, and candor ; his modesty, gentleness, and fidelity to every trust. His uniform serenity and self-poise under sore provo- cations were among the many proofs that he held frequent communion with his divine Master. To his yearning spirit heaven seemed more and more but another name for uninter- rupted and eternal fellowship with his Lord. " There is a sight from men concealed ; That sight, the face of God revealed, Shall bless the pure in heart." Of my eight colleagues who have finished their course, only one more will be named in this sketch. To the citizens of Hartford Dr. Robert G. Yermilye was better known than either of my associates of whom mention has been made. When the Institution came to this city in 1865, he was one of the two Professors constituting the faculty. That trying period of our history brought into clear light the noble qualities of his character. But want of time forbids more than a dance at his characteristics. For Christian integrity 38 and kindness, unswerving loyalty to Gospel truth with fair- ness to opponents, for refined dignity on public occasions and in the ordinary intercourse of life, for the rare union of qualities denoted by the true friend, the Christian gentleman, the able divine, the accomplished teacher and preacher, both the pupils and colleagues of Dr. Termilye will cherish his memory with affection and respect. Among the founders and devoted friends of the Seminary Rev. George A. Calhoun deserves to be held in grateful remembrance. For more than forty years pastor in North Coventry he acquired an enviable reputation both among his own people and the churches of the state. His good judg- ment, his intelligent apprehension of the issues involved in the discussions raised by the New Haven divines, his chari- table temper and prudent speech qualified him for the prom- inent position long held as trustee of the Institute. To him specially fell the task of collecting in small sums the funds to meet current expenses before endowments were provided. His tall, well-proportioned figure, the benignant seriousness of his countenance, his slow movements and deliberate speech invited the confidence and respect felt by all who knew him. His influence, it is believed, secured an early appropriation, repeated annually while he lived, by the trustees of the Hale Donation in aid of our students. Very few of them were able to defray current expenses from their own funds, and the Hale charity was eminently opportune. The whole amount received from that source and appropriated to reduce the cost of board is found to be $12,310. One of the most remarkable men connected with the early history of the Institute was Nathaniel Hewitt, D.D. At the time of its organization he was pastor of a church in Bridgeport. Some years before that his name had become familiar to the country as the "Apostle of Temperance." His overwhelming assaults on the drinking usages of those days made him famous in 1827, but his power as a pulpit orator had already achieved signal results in Fairfield. In any assembly he would impress a casual observer as an uncommon man. His massive form crowned with an impe- 39 rial head, his features bearing the stamp of a lofty, deter- mined spirit, his voice equally suited to the son of thunder and the son of consolation, were a part of his rare native gifts. With the traits that command admiration and respect were united others of a gentler kind that won the warmest affection of intimate companions. In his better frames, even when past the meridian of life, his conversational powers fascinated any circle of youth or reverend seniors. As a pastor in ministering to the afflicted and such as were oppressed with spiritual trouble his sympathy and skill were as noteworthy as the stronger features of his character on public occasions. Dr. Hewitt's theological convictions were entwined indissolubly with his personal religious experience. Deep consciousness of sin and assurance of salvation through the expiatory sufferings of Christ made it easy for him to accept the distinctive teachings of the New Testament and impelled him to preach and defend them most loyally. No one probably had more influence than Dr. Hewitt in the establishment of our Seminary, and for several years he labored earnestly for its welfare. Always punctual in his attendance at the anniversaries, and not an infrequent visitor at other times, the family that secured him for a guest or even at a dinner was deemed fortunate. For thirty-three years the pastorate of Dr. Elisha Lord Cleveland in New Haven was coincident with the life of the Seminary at East Windsor. As a trustee, he was identified with it for about a quarter of a century, and in the fellowship of long-continued trials for conscience sake, mutual sympathy bound us very closely together. It was natural that the young- est teacher in the Institute and its youngest trustee should be on the most intimate terms. Classmates at Andover, of the same age, favored with similar home-training in early life, traditionally and experimentally partial to the faith of the primitive churches held by our fathers, we could not differ widely respecting theological novelties that startled and dis- tressed reverent students of the divine Word. Dr. Cleve- land went to New Haven after graduating at Andover for the purpose of gaining such additional preparation 40 for the work of the ministry as the eminent teacher in the theological department of Yale College might afford. Soon called by the Third Church to become its pastor, he took a firm stand in relation to the doctrinal controversy then at its height. His church and congregation, neither rich nor numerous at the time of his settlement, were deeply in debt for their place of worship. The creditors, displeased with the doctrinal views set forth by the young pastor, pressed their claim so vigorously that he with his little flock that clung to him retired to an obscure hall. A feeble band despised by the world, they went forth from their house of worship wel- coming the reproach and embarrassment sure to follow. Fidelity to the principles he had avowed and taught seemed to require that the pastor should face any trial that the Mas- ter might appoint him when called to act so conspicuously as the representative of a conservative theology. " He cast his lot with poverty, odium, and the inevitable loss for a period of public and social position in the cultivated circles of a lit- erary and ecclesiastical center, in which he had been a favor- ite, and which he was so well fitted to grace and enjoy." At length the little baud that worshiped in a hall became a large, wealthy, and intelligent congregation. Their hall was exchanged first for the lecture-room kindly offered them by the Center Church, then for a new church edifice, attract- ive and commodious, and at last for the stately and beautiful temple which now adorns a central locality in the City of Elms. From a mere pittance the pastor's salary became the most liberal in the city. " He was sought to officiate on high public occasions." " His voice was heard more impressive and effective than any other," says Dr. Bacon, " in the great assembly of citizens that was convened at New Haven to pledge their support to the imperiled government." "In aid of his inward resources and endowments for high oratory and eloquence came all that richness, pathos, and melody of voice, so familiar to his congregation. There was his broad, yet not disproportioned frame, his face of singular beauty and strength, his deep-set eye, instinct with intelli- gence, at times almost hidden under his massive, overhanging 41 brow, often and not unjustly likened to Daniel Webster's ; the whole so apt to be lighted up by that smile which loved to play upon his lips, and which, if less than seraphic, often seemed more than human." Time permits only the bare mention of his executive ability, prudence, firmness, the amia- * bility of his temper, the wisdom, gentleness, and benignity, which shed such a radiance over his own home and made him so welcome in the families of his parishioners. Not by way of complaint, but as an instance of the limita- tions under which the interior work of the Institute was car- ried on, a glance is due at a single personal experience for a considerable period from the year 1834. Lack of funds and possibly defective views of what is implied in the phrase Biblical Literature may explain the fact that one individual was made responsible for all the teaching furnished the stu- dents in the exegesis both of the Old Testament and the New. By general consent first-rate scholarship and leisurely train- ing are indispensable requisites for success in either of these branches. Everybody would now say, if you would over- whelm the teacher and inflict an irreparable injury on his scholars, give him both. To my gray-haired pupils now before me, who must have often lamented the poor quality of their exegetical instruction at East Windsor Hill, I can only say the fault was not wholly mine. It is also remembered that the Professor of Hebrew and Greek was not at liberty to give his undivided strength to the work officially assigned him. At an early day a church was organized in the Semi- nary, which was located two miles from any place of worship, and two sermons were preached in the chapel every Sabbath. The service came to each of the Professors once in three weeks. Two of them had been pastors more than a score of years, the third just one year. The inevitable effect of this arrangement need not be described. Another little drawback should be mentioned. Among the extra official duties not to be evaded was the superintendence of rhetorical exercises and the correction of one-third of the sermons required from members of the senior class. At a later day the department 6 42 of Church History became vacant. With the help of text- books the Professor of Biblical Literature served for a time as a proxy. A little further on, when the health of the theological Professor broke down, the man of all work, now no longer young, was requested to take up for a time a part of the burden which had fallen from Dr. Vermilye's hands. Two prizes of sixty dollars each were offered about the year 1858 to members of the middle and senior classes who should pass the best examination in the first and second vol- umes of Turrettin's Theology. No member of the faculty coveted the office of examiner who must be supposed ready to try his pupils on any one of twelve hundred pages of eccle- siastical Latin. A majority vote of the professors added this to the other multifarious duties of the Professor of Biblical Literature. It was well for him that among Mr. Kingman's gifts to the library was a copy of Forcellmi totius Latinitatis Lexicon in four royal quarto volumes. Without this aid he might have hesitated one time to examine the valedictorian of his class at Yale College, who easily won the Turrettin prize. From necessity the proper division of labor, if theoretically acknowledged, was practically postponed to a recent period in our history. .If one " thrust himself into the duties or usurp the office of another," let the law of mutual subservi- ency exact a fit penalty. But if the foot does not volunteer to attempt the work of the hand, doing the ungracious thing under an iron necessity, u he is more sinned against than sin- ning." In commenting on the distribution of service enjoined in the twelfth chapter of Romans, Chalmers utters a protest against the modern policy of the church, a policy not unknown in other organizations. "We should as much as possible," he says, " humor, even as the Spirit Himself does, the consti- tutional varieties of tastes and talent among in en The tendency now is in an opposite direction and each has many things laid upon him What makes it all the more ruinous is, that rarely indeed is one man eminent in more than one thing; and the sure way, therefore, of degrad- ing him from eminence to mediocrity is to bustle and belabor him with more than one thing." 43 The review allotted me to-day may suitably close with a reference to two or three contrasts fitted to inspire with grati- tude and large expectations the guardians and friends of our Seminary. The number of students connected with the Institution during the thirty years prior to its removal from East Windsor never ran higher than thirty- four. Sometimes it fell much lower. Our present catalogue contains fifty-four names. The library lias grown from three thousand to thirty- eight thousand volumes. This numerical difference is fully equalled by the difference in the quality of our literary treasures. Less than two thousand dollars was laid out for books during our first three decades. To our earnest plea for help in that direction scarcely a faint response came back. At length a generous patron has appeared and the days of our mourning are ended. His name will be held in lasting and grateful remembrance by a long succession of teachers and pupils. Another mural tablet will not be wanting in our Hall when he is taken hence. In one particular a serious loss attended our removal to this city. Instead of the convenient, well-lighted, and well- ventilated rooms at the old home, our apartments in three dwelling-houses in Prospect street, and for a time in a fourth on Main street, were far from being satisfactory. Between the fifteen years passed in such quarters and the last five in this edifice we observe another step in our onward move- ment. Representatives of any class from 1834 to 1840, who may be here to-day, must remember the anniversary occasions of that period. The lecture-room, used also as a chapel, would accommodate besides the faculty, students ancl trustees not more than fifty persons. Addresses by members of the graduating class and by some eminent divine, it is pre- sumed, were heard with satisfaction and profit by all present. Among the friends of the Seminary in neighboring towns were some excellent singers who conducted the service of song at these annual gatherings, assisted by the home choir. On one occasion, owing probably to the absence of outside helpers, the musical part of the entertainment seemed likely to be a failure. But unexpected help was at hand. A young 44 man from, an obscure hill-town had found his way into the chapel. He had enjoyed such advantages for the cultivation of music as the village singing schools of that day afforded, and seizing the opportunity to volunteer a solo when a suit- able interval occured, he sung in a heavy bass voice the entire hymn of Mrs. Hemans on the landing of the Pilgrims. Over against that performance will be given this evening the Oratorio of the Messiah ,by the Hosmer Hall Choral Union. Financially the outlay of three thousand dollars a year has grown, probably, to seven or eight times that sum, and authority given at first to hold fifty thousand dollars' worth of property now covers the right to hold twenty times this amount. As to the method of making the column of receipts tally with that of disbursements, it is surmised that between our present treasurer and his predecessor it would not be easy to picture a contrast. Estimated by a just standard, the title of collegiate and theological institutions to public confidence depends on their teachers far more than on their material resources and accommodations. The advance made by our Seminary in this vital matter is a plain token of " the good will of Him that dwelt in the bush." This comparison of then and now should embrace one more feature. The sneers and unscrupulous censures, leveled at our Institute in its youth and its long struggle with poverty and weakness, have largely given way either to a decent silence or words of confi- dence and cheer. This happy change is distinctly shown also by liberal gifts, increasing sympathy and other tokens of regard from our fellow-citizens, which we trust the future will more and more justify. Only in rare instances is one permitted to look back and note the vicissitudes of an enterprise with which his hopes and toils have been identified for half a century, from early man- hood to quite beyond three score years and ten. Of the thirty- six men who met in the small brick school-house at East Wind- sor fifty years ago only three are now living. Of the first board of trustees, twenty-four in number, not one remains. Of the eight Professors who held office while we continued at East Windsor Hill I am the only one left. At short inter- 45 vals the names on our Historical Catalogue are marked with the lethal star. But the Seminary abides. The tree transplanted from East Windsor to Prospect and from Prospect to Broad street without being killed or dwarfed may be expected to outlive successive generations of trustees, professors, and pupils. The badge seen on the walls of an old English mansion, long occu- pied by the family of Moore, is the mulberry tree, the morus, and the legend is, "Morus tarde moriens, morum cito moritur." The mulberry tree is slow to die ; the mulberry fruit dies soon. Outside of our city and of our commonwealth friendly eyes are directed to this seat of sacred learning. -If we hesitate to credit the predictions of sanguine coadjutors who have recently espoused our cause, yet they may well incite us to whole-hearted endeavors in our allotted field. When devout, scholarly interpretation of the divine Word, based on ap- proved principles, shall fail to sanction any doctrine here taught when theological novelties antagonistic to the faith of the Christian Church for ages shall have vindicated them- selves in personal purity and spiritual fruitfulness hitherto unknown or rarely witnessed it will be soon enough to revise our creed. Tested by the best biblical scholarship, by count- less individual experiences and by their transforming, elevat- ing power on domestic, social, and national life, let the doc- trines which we hold and teach ever find able advocates and cordial friends in the guardians and faculty of this Institution. Our Seminary began its life as a practical protest against what were deemed unscriptural sentiments. Like the speckled bird of the prophet, " the birds round about were against her." If others judge that the time has come to exchange signals with those who deny the supreme authority of the Scriptures, the expiatory nature of Christ's death, and the endless punishment of those who die impenitent, let us incur a fresh storm of obloquy, if need be, and welcome double the distresses of past years rather than prove disloyal to the faith- ful and true Witness. Should some ingenious rationalistic speculator attempt to use our 'consecrated funds for purposes alien to the views inculcated here for the last half century, 46 let the memory of Tyler and Nettleton, of Atwater, Calhoun, and Hosmer rouse their official successors to the fearless dis- charge of their sacred trust. If the gratified sentiment that pervades our present convocation is shared by invisible spec- tators, let us hope that the enlarged cloud of witnesses at our next jubilee may rejoice that the Hartford Theological Semi- nary is permitted to bear a humble part in whatever service may be needful at that brighter day to complete the triumph of Christ our Lord. Mindful of the perils that beset all human organizations we will rely on the guardianship of Him who has been our helper in all the checkered history of the past. " The Lord our God be with us as He was with our fathers ; let Him not leave us nor forsake us ; that He may incline our hearts unto Him, to walk in all His ways, and to keep His commandments, and His statutes, and His judgments which He commanded our fathers," to Whom be glory and honor, thanksgiving and praise. Bennett Tyler, D.D. BY REV. LAVALETTE PERRIN, D. D. -I have been requested to give a pen-picture appropriate to this occasion of Rev. Bennett Tyler, DD., as he stands related to the work of this Seminary, and to polemic theology in New England. While I appreciate the complimentary courtesy of the request, I am at a loss to find in myself any special fitness for such a service, unless it be that given by the opportunity while studying theology, and during the early years of my ministry, to observe from an unbiased stand-point, the parties to a vigorous polemic struggle which was hap- pily issued in the victory of both. If it had been required of my now sainted mother, whose relations to this Institution in its early struggles were quite intimate, to characterize Dr. Tyler as a man, a neighbor, a minister, a preacher, and a pastor, I am sure she would have done it, in the use of all proper terms of admiration and eulogy, in the superlative degree. And to her estimate I should heartily subscribe, first from a belief that no more conscientious and competent witness could be called, and also because a limited personal acquaintance gave the same testimony. This service does not require the expression of personal or partisan devotion. Nor should this occasion be used for the parade of fulsome eulogy. If the praise wrought so often into the rhetoric of commemorative discourse, were expressed in loving, helpful fellowship with living workers in their toils and trials, death might sometimes defer his advent among them. A larger charity, and a more sympathizing, coopera- tive zeal among the living, will serve the cause of the Master better than incense burned upon the tombs of the dead. We 48 are indeed to cherish the memory of the just, but our regard for God's servants should not begin at their graves. It is a fault of our times that living, struggling worth, is often lost sight of in the shadow of departed greatness, real or illusive. The chief value of commemorative discourse to the earnest Christain worker, is in the aid it gives him for the study of God's providential provision for the spread and defense of the truth. It is both instructive and inspiring to observe how, for the development and spread of His Kingdom, God raises up the needed human agents at the right time. Studied in this light, the biography of eminent Christian scholars and workers is as profitable as it is interesting. In this light let us try to set the character and work of Dr. Tyler. The eighteenth century is remarkable for certain prepara- tory movements and provisions for the wonderful develop- ments of the nineteenth. This is as true in the religious as it is in the political history of our country and the world. As when on a summer's day which precedes some great convul- sion of nature, the skilled observer discerns tokens of coming agitation in the cast of the sky, the state of the atmosphere, and the fleecy mists that rise here and there, so in the religious aspect of the New England churches during the eighteenth century, the discriminating observer sees a divine preparation for that signal outcome of mental and spiritual activity, which has given us two flourishing theological seminaries in the State of Connecticut, and a rapid succession of new depart- ures in the methods and matter of Christian teaching. In their utter rejection of the petrified forms of godliness, the churches in the middle of the last century had well-nigh lost the power of godliness, which always requires some form for its proper exercise and expression. The necessities of their case, and their isolated condition, had fostered a hard, materi- alistic tendency in modes of thought, and the theology of the times had little power to stir and lift the soul. The logic of the intellect had so crystalized about the technics of the day as to allow no exercise for the rhetoric of the feelings. A revo- lution was to be effected in the thought-systems and forms of 49 the New England churches. The raw, cheerless, dead air of a necessitarian philosophy was to give place to a more genial, life-inspiring atmosphere. Only a thunder-storm that should sweep the entire realm of religious thought, and leave echoes and reverberations here and there skirting the horizon for long years to come, would sift its deadly elements from the moral atmosphere, and give it moisture and vitalizing energy. God works in the spiritual world as truly as in the natural, by laws and agents adapted to the end in view. In the line of this thought is a fact worthy of our special notice just here. The eighteenth century produced, in these New England churches, a number of stalwart Christian thinkers, and the first half of the present century was marked by the appearance of just that conflict of opinion which is incidental to real progress, in the apprehension of spiritual truth. Without naming others, of whom there were many, we may notice six eminent divines who may be said to have prepared the way for, and contributed largely to, that battle of the bishops which was in progress fifty years ago called by one writer the " Connecti- cut Controversy," and some of the veterans in which were just resting upon their laurels when I entered the ministry. Let me name them in the order of their birth, and do not fail to observe that five of them were natives of our little State, and the sixth did his life-work in it. Jonathan Edwards was born at Windsor in 1T03 ; Joseph Bellamy at New Cheshire in 1719 ; Samuel Hopkins at Waterbury in 1721 ; Nathaniel Emmons at East Haddam in 1745 ; Timothy Dwight at Northampton in 1752 ; and Charles G. Finney at Warren in 1792. These names are as household words in the discussions and Christ- ian activities of the present century. Beginning with Jona- than Edwards, who wrestled with the mighty problem of sin and salvation while teaching savages in the wilderness, and closing with Charles G. Finney, who swept the broad and barren field of logical skepticism with the fire of a new spiritual life, the last century gave birth to the efficient agents in a grand movement forward and upward of Christian thought and purpose. 7 50 The progress has been slow, and some of the steps in it have seemed for a time to be backward rather than forward, but viewed as a whole the trend of thought and feeling has been steadily in advance. From 1750 to 1850 we easily trace the steps of progress toward this result, and this Institution is an incidental product of the transition process. Already had the sturdy logic of Edwards, blended with the facile rhetoric of D wight, and fired with the fervor, aggres- sive zeal and questioned methods of Finney, brought on an irrepressible conflict of views and utterances, when I first became a servant of the churches. A host of Christian cham- pions were wrestling with the new thought-forms which the spirit of progress demanded. To me, then, they seemed like giants, and I doubt not they were honestly, as they certainly were earnestly, contending for the faith once delivered to the saints. The rank and file of our Connecticut ministers recog- nized as worthy leaders such men as Dow of Thomson, Yale of New Hartford, Cleveland of New Haven, Hewett of Bridge- port, Calhoun of Coventry, Nettleton the Evangelist, and Perkins of West Hartford, who did not fully agree with Porter of Farmington, McEwen of New London, Goodrich of New Haven, Bushnell of Hartford, Bacon of New Haven, and Arms of Norwich, in the choice of terms and methods to be used in their work. These valiant soldiers, with others of equal worth and ability, too numerous to name in this brief sketch, were in active service on the field, when, as a raw recruit, I entered the ranks on duty. Noble men they were, loyal to the Master, and seeking the spread of truth, but having gifts differing and seeing the truth under different phases or aspects, it quite naturally followed that some of the words they employed were not fitly chosen, and not always fitly spoken. But we trust they have all now entered those realms of light and harmony, where they see as they are seen and know as they are known, and these differences by which they were so disturbed in the flesh have melted away in the light and warmth of the Sun of Righteousness. We have thus a background upon which to set the picture of Dr. Tyler. It will doubtless seem to you that the back- 51 ground is made the chief feature of the picture. There are two reasons for this. First, the face itself has been already drawn in his published memoir, to which, as a portrait of the man himself, I cannot hope to add, and which you would not wish me to repeat. And secondly, to get a right view of the man we must see him as he was encircled by the earnest Christian men of his day, intent upon what seemed to them a momentous issue. Upon this background he rises before us, the central figure of a school or phalanx, over against whom, in a like aspect of leadership, was Dr. Taylor of New Haven. It was my privilege as a student to sit at the feet of both, and it is my pleasure fcere to express a high admiration of them, as able, honest, and earnest teachers and preachers of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Differing widely in mental structure and furniture, each possessed a special fitness for the position he occupied on the battle-field of the hour. Tak- ing their observations from different stand-points, it was nat- ' ural that they should emphasize different truths, and different phases of the same truth. It brings out the features of Dr. Tyler more minutely to mark the difference between the two. In both there is reverence for the truth, and zeal in proclaim- ing it. In one it is reverence for the truth as formulated by the fathers. In the other it is reverence for the truth as per- sonally apprehended. With Dr. Tyler there was something valuable in old associations. He loved not only truth, but the familiar dress which it wore. Besides, he was distrustful of human speculations. With him faith had no need of phil- osophy as a voucher. Not what man can comprehend, but what God has revealed, was with him the ruling question. Yet he would retain and use the old technical terms as the signs of living ideas, not as the monuments of dead ones. Nor would he allow rhetorical beauties to harden into logical perplexities. To know and teach the truth as revealed in the word of God was his guiding, purpose. While partial to the old terms and methods, he was not blind to new aspects of truth and new expressions for it. Indeed, so kindly did he carry himself toward any improvement in this respect, that at one time he fell under the suspicion of favoring the " new 52 departure " of his day, and was under formal surveillance by certain strict constructionists, as tending to a departure from the faith. Nor is it difficult to see by a comparison of his earliest with his latest writings, that his own views of truth were modified and enlarged by his study and criticism of the views of others. But his loyalty to the word of God was unfeigned and steadfast. With our canvas and its background thus prepared, if we view Dr. Tyler in a comparison with others, say Drs. Tay- lor, Hewett, Goodrich, Calhoun, and Porter of Farmington, it will help us to get the more important features of the man. While he differed from each of tkese in character as a whole, he combined their leading features in well-rounded and hap- pily-balanced harmony. The adventurous assurance of Tay- lor ; the dictatorial push of Hewett ; the quick zeal of Good- rich ; the stern conservatism of Calhoun ; and the winning benevolence of Porter, make striking personal contrasts when put in bold relief and distinct outline upon the same canvas. But the Divine Artist so wrought the extremes of these vir- tuous impulses into a golden mean of true saintliness in the character of Dr. Tyler, that his face alone upon the picture gives us their embodied harmony. This happy combination of qualities fitted him for the special relation in which he stood to this institution, and to the churches and ministers of his time. As a man he was well furnished, and of comprehensive affinities for all the relations of life. The well-ordered Chris- tian family was to him an earthly paradise. There, in all the quiet beauty and loveliness of chastened piety, he scattered benedictions and was refreshed by the responses of love and devotion. Mild and loving as a husband and father, yet always firm for the right at the home altar; kind, cheerful, and genial as a companion, a friend, a 1 neighbor, the large- hearted benevolence written upon his face found constant play in the more social relations of life. As a pastor he was impartial, sympathetic, and tender in all required ministries ; as a preacher he was always instruc- tive, often very earnest, and sometimes he brought a magnetic 53 influence to bear upon the attentive hearer ; as a reasoner he was methodical rather than incisive, and sought more to per- suade than to compel men to believe ; as a teacher he was winsome and helpful in developing truth rather than imperi- ous and positive in stating it. In form, of medium height, with broad shoulders and full chest ; a ruddy face, susceptible of varied expression ; a mild eye that often kindled with feel- ing, and a physique noticeable for its symmetry, Dr. Tyler stood among the noble Christian workers of his day, the embodiment of qualities and powers of a very high order. His life-work developed in happy proportions practical theol- ogy working through practical religion for the salvation of men. Dr. Tyler was born July 10, 1783, in Middlebury, Conn. At the age of seventeen he entered Yale College, and was graduated in 1804. He studied theology with the Eev. Asa- hel Hooker of Goshen, was licensed by the Litchfield North Association in 1806, and was installed pastor of the church in South Britain, June, 1808. In 1822 he was elected and made president of Dartmouth College. In 1828 the Second Church in Portland, Me., invited him to become their pastor, and he accepted the call. When this institution was founded in 1834, he was persuaded to give it his services, and contin- ued at the head of it until 1857, when he resigned. His work was nearly done. He died May 14, 1858. The manner of his death is thus recorded : " On the morning of Friday, May 14, 1858, he had taken his usual exercise in the garden of his daughter, Mrs. Greeley, and at nine o'clock entered the house, saying, i I have finished the garden, if I do not live to eat of its fruit.' He was immediately seized with a neuralgic affec- tion in the head and lungs, from which he suffered exceed- ingly. He could not be moved home. His w T ife, children, and grand-children gathered round the bed of the dying patriarch, and received his parting counsels. He was asked if it was a pleasant thought that he should be free from sin. He replied, ' It is the pleasantest thought I have ; ' then added, with characteristic self-distrust, ' But O, if I should be 54 deceived ! ' He said little about his feelings : ' I am a great sinner, but Christ is a great Saviour.' 'I have not the rav- ishing views which some have had, but I enjoy perfect peace.' ' The heart is very deceitful, but I trust I am not deceived ; I have no fear.' At eight o'clock in the evening he fell asleep in Jesus." Monograph on Dr. Nettleton. ASAHEL NETTLETON was born in North Killingworth, Conn., April 21, 1783, of humble parents. His father, a farmer in moderate circumstances, was esteemed and respected by his neighbors. Both parents were professors of religion, on the Half-way Covenant plan (i. e., on their assent to the covenant of the church though not admitted to the Lord's table they were permitted to present their child for baptism.) There had been for half a century a great religious dearth in New England. But now the Spirit of the Lord was poured out in a copious manner. In connection with a published account of the awakening in North Killingworth, the cases of two or three converts, as described by themselves, were printed, and Nettleton was one of them. " It was about ten months from the time when Mr. Nettleton's attention was first seriously turned to the subject of religion before he obtained peace in believing. "With him, what the old divines termed the t law work] was deep and thorough. This pro- tracted season of conviction gave him a knowledge of the human heart which few possess, and which was doubtless intended by God to prepare him for that preeminent success which attended his labors as a minister of Christ." In the year 1801 the father of Mr. Nettleton died, and as he was the oldest son the care of the family devolved on him. While expecting to spend his days on the farm his mind was actively reflecting upon the condition of lost sinners in the world. When at work in the field, he would often say to himself, " If I might be the means of saving one soul, I should prefer it to all the riches and honors of this world." He would frequently look forward to eternity, and put to himself the question, " What shall I wish I had done, thousands .and millions of 56 years hence ? " Samuel J. Mills and Asaliel Nettleton were born on the same day. It is a remarkable fact, that their new birth occurred very nearly at the same time, that their con- victions were similar, and from the commencement their con- secration of the same peculiar cast. Nettleton resolved, under the strong pressure of these convictions, to seek an education. While laboring on the farm, he devoted leisure moments to study, reciting occasionally to his pastor, in the winter teach- ing school, and employing his evenings on studies preparatory to the college course. Thus, in two or three years, he accom- plished his |>lan, and entered the Freshman class of Yale Col- lege, in 1805. At that time he was the only professor of religion in his class. In the winter of 1807-8, a revival of religion began in New Haven and Yale College. He was most active and helpful, and especially sought for by those under conviction, for his experience and wise counsels. He believed, that sinners, properly speaking, never use, but always abuse the means of grace that in all their efforts to escape future misery and secure future happiness, they are influenced by unholy motives, and that their services are mercenary and sinful. In this opinion, which to him appeared to be clearly taught in the Scripture, he was greatly confirmed by his own religious experience. While under conviction of sin, he had such discoveries of his own heart as to impress indelibly upon his mind a conviction of the entire sinfulness of the religious ' services of un renewed men. There was no one point in the- ology on which his mind was more fully established than this ; or one on which he more strenuously insisted during his life, both in the pulpit, and in his conversation with awakened sin- ners. He considered it a point of great practical importance, and particularly useful in destroying the self-righteous hopes of sinners, and in showing them their lost condition, and entire dependence on the grace of God. This was a weapon which he wielded with great power, and which seemed, in his hands, preeminently " the sword of the Spirit." I have quoted somewhat at length, this statement of his early and established foundation in the truth, because it is the key, not only to his wonderful mission during the ensuing 57 twenty-five years, but the main ground upon which he became so strenuous and active and successful in laying the founda- tions of this School of the Prophets fifty years ago. During the junior year in Yale College, Nettleton became acquainted with Samuel J. Mills, who had come to New Haven for an interview with him, having heard from a mutual friend that " he intended never to be settled, but to be a missionary to the heathen." They compared views and con- sulted together concerning their future work in Foreign Missions. They "entered into an agreement to avoid all entangling alliances, and to hold themselves in readiness to go to the heathen, whenever God, in his providence, should prepare the way. They also formed the purpose of meeting the next year at Andover, and while pursuing their theolog- ical studies, to mature their plans of future action. This purpose, Mr. Nettleton found himself under the painful necessity of abandoning, on account of a debt which he had contracted, while obtaining his education ; and which he wished to discharge as soon as possible. He felt the disap- pointment deeply. Soon after graduation he accepted the office of butler in College, held it for a year, and devoted what leisure time he could command to theological studies. After that he put himself under the instructions of Rev. Bezaleel Pinneo of Milford, with whom he remained until licensed to preach, by New Haven West Association, May 28, 1811. It is well known that in 1810, Messrs. Judson, Nott, Mills, and Newell, at that time members of Andover Seminary, presented themselves before the General Association of Mass. in Bradford, and made known their convictions of the duty and importance of personally attempting a mission to the heathen, and requested the advice of the Association, and that this movement led to the formation of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. Had Mr. Nettleton fulfilled his plan of going to Andover, doubtless he would have been one of that company. When he heard what had been done, he lamented with tears that he could 8 58 not have been there. He feared that Providence thus indi- cated that he should not enter the foreign field. He still, however, cherished the purpose, and did not abandon wholly the hope, till the failure of his health in 1822. After his license to preach, on account of the above intention, he declined to be a candidate for settlement in the ministry, and commenced his labors in some waste places and desolate parts of the Lord's vineyard. His labors were crowned with signal success. Wherever he went the Spirit of God seemed to accompany his preaching. His brethren in the ministry, seeing these extraordinary results, advised him to delay his purpose of leaving the country. Acceding to this advice, it became increasingly apparent, that a great work was needed in the churches at home, and that his labors as evangelist were especially owned of God. Accordingly he was ordained as an evangelist in the summer of 1817, by the South Association of Litchfield County. "In the year 1820, the General Association of Connecticut appointed a committee to take into consideration the subject of increasing ministerial labor in the several congregations of their body. They invited Mr. Nettleton to meet with them, and requested his opinion as to the expediency of introducing and supporting an order of Evangelists. He gave it, as his opinion, that it would be inexpedient to introduce and support such an order. He foresaw the evils that would be likely to grow out of the system, if it were made per- manent, and they were the very evils which afterwards arose in some parts of the country, extending their baleful influence to the present time. From 1812 to 1822 Mr. Nettleton labored in revivals in different parts of this State and often in waste places, with great power from on high, and with the result of the conver- sion of many precious souls. An account of his work written in 1817, says, "The doctrines taught are those considered as the grand leading truths of the Gospel, viz. : the strict spiritu- ality of the moral law the total depravity of the natural heart its enmity to God the necessity of regeneration by the Holy Spirit an entire dependence on the merits of Jesus 59 Christ, for justification, pardon, and acceptance our obliga- tions to own Him before men, and to manifest our faith in Him by a holy walk and conversation the divine sovereignty the electing love of God and the final perseverance of the saints, as the only ground of the sinner's hope, and the anchor for the Christian's soul." Mr. Nettleton was not the originator of the measures resulting in the formation of the Pastoral Union of Conn., and the establishment of this Theological Institute ; but he was in most hearty sympathy with the purpose of the founders, and took a deep interest in the doctrines declared as the basis of agreement. At the organization he was appointed Professor of Pastoral Duty, but chose not to sustain any official relation to the Institute that he might with the more freedom and effect plead its cause. It may be well to note at this point the esteem in which he was held by the churches, and some of the ablest representatives of the Congregational clergy of New England. When, in 1828, slanderous reports were circulated about him in Virginia, where he was laboring, on account of his faithful- ness and convincing power in preaching, testimonials vouch- ing for his character, and attesting the copious abundance of heavenly blessings upon his public ministrations, were for- warded to the Rev. Dr. John H. Rice of that State, signed by the late Dr. Bacon of New Haven, Pres. Day, Profs. Taylor, Goodrich, and Fitch of Yale College. In the year before, Dr. Lyman Beecher, then of Boston, in a letter to the editor of the Christian Spectator, says: "Mr. Nettleton has served God and his generation with more self-denial, and wisdom, and success, than any man living. I witnessed his commencement and know his progress, and the relative state of things in Connecticut especially, and what (but for his influence in promoting revivals, and exciting, and teaching by example, others to promote them) might have been the condition of the churches in those days of revolution through which they have passed ? And considering how far his knowl- edge and influence have extended, I regard him as beyond comparison, the greatest benefactor which God has given to this nation. Now that such a man as he should be traduced, 60 and exposed to all manner of evil falsely, is what neither my reason nor my conscience, nor my heart will endure. And in anticipation of the attack which may be, and probably will be made on him, though I am pressed immeasurably with the warfare here, yet sure I am of this, that so long as God spares my life and powers, there is one man certainly, in New England (I know there are thousands) who will consider that in defending him, he defends the cause in one of its most vital points. While I live I am pledged to brother Nettleton by affection, and gratitude, and duty, and nothing could grieve or alarm me more, than to witness in New England, any flinching, or any temporizing in respect to him." Thus spake Lyman Beecher in Boston, when in his prime, he stood up against the encroachments and speculations then practi- cally taking form in this suppressed hostility to Mr. Nettle- ton, and afterwards formulated into a system philosophically undermining the doctrines of grace. His views on some points of theology, that were spoken without "bated breath" in the year 1834, are briefly touched in some of his letters at that time. Speaking of a certain class of divines he says : " They admit that there is a tendency, or propensity to sin, in the very constitution of the human mind," but they deny that this tendency is sinful. They also admit that " every effect must have a cause, and that this cause must be prior to the effect." Now I observe that the objections which they allege against the views of their oppo- nents, lie equally against their own. It will be no easier for the sinner to repent and believe against this propensity to sin, than it was while it was called a " sinful propensity." Changing the name of a lion into that of a lamb, will not alter its nature. We have here the new philosophy, that all trees are by nature alike, neither good nor bad, until they bear fruit. And then the tree is not good, but the tree is good only because the fruit is good, and vice versa. " Make the tree good and the fruit will be good," said our Saviour, u for the tree is known by the fruit." " Make the fruit good, and the fruit will be good," says the new philosophy, " for the fruit is known by the fruit. Nothing is good or bad but th