■m^Aii,:^^^^--y\^ vy^mm^d^ ol 01 01 7 I 4i 6! 9i 9 6 l^he B^eliglous Ufc of Botanical Phikfophy^ A SERMON PREACHED AT THE CHURCFI Gx^ St. LEONARD, SHOREDITCH, On WHIT SUN-TUESDAY, June r, 1784, On t]:ie W i s d o rj of God, as difplayed in the Vegetable Creation. By W I L L I a xM J O N E S, M. a. FELLOW OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY. THE SECOND E D I T I O xNT. L O N D O Prifileil for G. G. J. nr.d J. Robinson, Ptter-ncfTf r-Row ; J. F. and C. Rivingtoh> St. Paul's Church-Yird ; and VV. Keymer Colchefler. SRLF URL sx S/53 DEDICATION. T O Sir JOSEPH BANKS, Bart. PRESIDENT OF the ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. SIR, I I TH E following difcourfe bears an humble tef- timony to the excellence of Botanical Phi- ' LosoPHY, which has been honoured with much of ; YOUR attention, and in which your name will always : be of the firft eminence. I thought myfelf happy in an opportunity of ex- ■ preffing on a proper occasion my regard to a I fcience, in which I have found great delight, from I SS4 the I IJ DEDICATION, ')c time wlaen I fiiH: turned my thoughts to the ■'jdy of nature: v.nd the return of every fcrifQii iiiil brinrs feme new pleafure with it. Fut what aie our views, Sir, who ftudj at home, when com- pared with YOURS ? who, not content with the limita- tions to which we lefier ftudents mud: fubmit, h.avc furvcyed, [o (ar as man can do, the whole vegetable kingdom ; that wonderful theatre, in ^^'hich the di- vine wifdom and gocdnefs are fo largely difplayed : '^ihis, Sir, has been your botanical garden ! You went abroad with all the botany of your own coun- try, and vou added to it thiat of the terraqueous o-lobe : like a vcffel that carries out the commodities to of Britain, and returns laden with the riches of the world. But there is ftill a farther treafure, which may be daily opening itfelf to us, in the various applications of this ufeful and pleafant fcience. We are all per- fuaded, that much, (perhaps the far greater part] of the medicinal ufcs of plants, is ilill hidden from man ; being either totally unknown, or loft and forgotten. I humbly think, fome experimental enquiries might be forwarded with fuccefs, for obtaining a more cer- tain and extenfive knowledge of the virtue of trees and DEDICATION. Ill and herbs. This would be an honour to botcanical philofophy ; and that no empty honour ; it would be highly beneficial to mankind. That the fcience of nature, and all the ufeful learning that relates to it, may be promoted by your example and labours, and encouraged by your patro- nage and protection in the learned focicty over which you prefide, is the fervent wifli of, S I R^ Your mod obedient. and devoted Nayland, Aug, 2, 17B4, humble Servant, WILLIAM JONES. E R M O N, ^c. And the earth brought forth grafsy and herb yielding feed after his ki?tdy and the tree yielding fruit, whofe feed was in itfelf; and God faw that it was good. Gen. i. 12. F an author who fhould undertake to explain the proportion of architedure, were to trouble us with along preface, to prove i that eveiy houfe we fee, mufl have been the work of fome man, becaufe no houfe could pofTibly build itfelf, or rife into form by | accident ; I prefume, we fhould all be of opinion, that he might ! have fpared this part of his labour. It feems equally fuperfluous to infift, that the ftrudure of nature could not raife itfelf; the i cafes being- exadlly parallel, and both felf-evident to common I fenfe. There is a fort of fenfe, which pretends to difcover, not ! only that the argument is necelTary, but that the proof is deficient. We truft, however, that fuch fenfe neither is, nor ever will be ' common. If t^here really be fuch a thing as ipeculative or philo- ; ( 2 ) which the ait'edatlon of wifdoin meets tlie extremity of folly ^ and it would be lofs of time to reafon with it. We therefore take it iipon the authority of the text, that herbs, trees, fruits and feeds, are the work of God ; and the prefent occafiou requires us to con- fider how, and in what refpeds, this work is good, and difplays the wifdom of the great Creator. The goodnefs afcribed to this part of the creation is evidently not moral but natural : it means, that the feveral articles of the vegetable kingdom have that fort of goodnefs of which they are capable ; that they are beautiful and perfecft in their kinds j won- derful in their growth ; fufficient in their powers and properties ; and beneficial in their ufes. In thefe capacities we are to con- fider them j and to obferve how the wifdom of the Creator is manifefted, Firft, in the form and flrudure of vegetables. Secondly, in the manner of their growth. Thirdly in their natural ufes, for meat and medicine. Fourthly, in their moral ufes ; for the advancement of human prudence and religious faith. Herbs and flowers may be regarded by fome perfons as objecfls of inferior confideration in philofophy^ but every thing mufl: be great which hath God for its author. To him all the parts of nature are equally related. The flowers of the earth can raile our thoughts up to the Creator of the world as efFe<5lually as the ftars of ( 3 ) of heaven : and till we make this ufe of both, we cannot be faid to think properly of either. The contemplation of nature ihould always be feafoned with a mixture of devotion -, the highcft fa- culty of the human mind ; by which alone contemplation is im- proved, and dignified, and dired:ed to its proper objed. To join thcfe together is the delign of our prefent meeting ; and when they are joined, may they never more be put afunder. In the form and ilrudure of plants, with the provifion for their growth and increafe, there is a flore of matter which would more than fill a philofophical treatife : I mufl therefore content myfelf with tracing fome of the outlines of fo large a fubjed:. The firft thing which engages the curlofity of man, and tempts him to beflow fo much of his labour and attention upon this part of the creation, is the beautiful form and fplendid at- tire of plants. They who pradife this labour know how de- lightful it is. It feems to reftore man in his fallen flate to a par- ticipation of that felicity, which he enjoyed while innocent in Paradife. When wc cafl our eyes upon this part of nature, it is firfl ob- iervable, that herbs and trees compofe a fcene fo agreeable to the iight, becaufe they are invelled with that green colour, which being exactly in the middle of the fpedlrum of the coloured rays of light, is tempered to a mildnefs which the eye can bear. The other brighter and more fnnple colours are fparingly beftowed on tlie flowers of plants ; and which, if diffufed over all their parts, would have been too glaring, and confequently offenlive. The 'fmaller and more elegant parts are adorned with that bright- B 2 nefs ( 4 ) nefs, which attrads the admiration without endangering the fcnfe. But wliile the eye is delighted with the colouring of a flower, the reafon may be ftill more engaged with the natural ufe and defign of a flower in tlie oeconomy of vegetation. The rudi- ment of the fruit, when young and tender, requires fome cover- ing to proted: it ; and accordingly, the flower-leaves furround the feat of frud:ification ; when the fun is warm, they are expanded by its rays, to give the infant-fruit the benefit of the heat -, to forward its growth when the fun fets, and the cold of the even- ing prevails, the flower-leaves naturally clofe, that the air of the night may not injure the feed-vefl'el. As the fructification ad- vances, and the changes of the air are no longer hurtful, the flower-leaves have anfwered their end, and fo they wither and fall away. How elegant therefore, as well as appofite, is that allu- fion in the gofpel ; / /ay unto you that Solofno?i in all his glory y was not arrayed like one of thefe'^ for the flower, which is the glory of the lily and other plants, is literally and phyfically a raiment for the clothing of the feed-vefl^el. And a raiment it is, whofe texture furpafles all the laboured produdions of art for the clothing of an eafl:ern monarch. The finefl; works of the loom and the needle, if examined with a microfcope, appear fo rude and coarfe, that a favage might be afnamed to wear them : but when the work of God in a flower is brought to the fame tefl:, we fee how fibres, too minute for the naked eye, are compofed of others ftill more minute ; and they of others -, till the primordial threads or firft principles of the texture, are utterly undifcernible ; while the whole fiibfl:ance prefents a celefl:ial radiance in its colouring, with a richnefs fuperior to filver and gold 5 as if it were intended for Matt. vi. 29. ( 5 ) for the clothing of an angel. The whole creation does not afford a more fplendid obje(a for minute examination than the leaves and filaments of flowers ; even of fome flowers which look ob4 fcure, and promife little or nothing to the naked eye. I But befides this richnefs of fubflance and colour, there is an ele- gance of defign in the whole form and difpofition of a plant, which human artifl:s, in ornamental works, are always fludious to imitate. Their leaves, and branches and flowers, are thrown about with that eafe, and turned into beautiful lines, fo as to charm the eye with a variety of flexure, and convince us that all the ex- cellence of art mufl: take its pattern from nature. The parts generally obfervable in plants, are a root, a ftalk, branches, leaves, flowers, fruit and feeds, fucceedlng each other in their order, and all feeming neceflTaiy to one another. But un- der the diredlion of divine wildom, vegetable life is carried on in every pofTible form, and the end of frudiification is attained, while the means feem to be wantino: : as if Providence meant to fhewl us, that it is not confined to any particular means -, and that the work of God in this refped effentially differs from the work of man. The Capillary Plants, or Ferns, have neither ftalks, norl branches, nor flowers, but conflfl of fmgle leaves on their pedi- cles, with feeds upon the backs of them. The flower of the Carline Thiftle fits upon the ground without a ilalk ; while the Euphorbium, or Torch-thiflile, has nothing but a flalk, like the ftaft" of a fpear. The Mclon-thifile is all fruit ; tlie Opuntia, or Indian fig, all leaf; the Jcflamine has a flower without a it.Q,d.-^ the Fig-tree a fruit without a flovv^er. The "tuber terrcv, or Trufle, has neither leaf, fbem, branch, flower nor feed ; nothing but a globular root, which thrives under ground, and does not ap- pear ( 6 ) pear to be fed by fibres like other roots : yet It increafes and multiplies. It is a general rule in nature, that plants which have the fame charadters have like qualities ; but where this rule would teach us to expedl a poifon, we find a plant with an agreeable odour and wholefome nourlihment ; as in the Solajium Efcukntmn, which is of a deadly race, with all the external chara(flers of a night-lhade. Are we not hence to learn, that quality does not arife from con- figuration, or from any necefiity of nature ; but follows the will and wifdom of the Creator ; who to every plant, as to every man,