L^vARY I;MU . WSITY OF CALIF 1,'RNIA SAN DIEGO THK TWO REPUBLICS OR ROMK AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ALONZO T. JONES No past event has any intrinsic importance. The knowledge of it is valu- able only as it leads us to form just calculations with respect to the future. MACAULAY. REVIEW AND HERALD PUBLISHING CO. BATTLE CREEK, MICH. CHICAGO, TORONTO, AND ATLANTA. PACIFIC PRESS PUBLISHING CO. OAKLAND, CAL. NEW YORK, SAN FRANCISCO, AND LONDON, COPYRIGHTED 1891, BY A. T. JONES. To THE COMMON PEOPLE, who heard our common Master gladly, and whose silent, practical experience "throughout the history of the Church, has always been truer and has led the Church in a safer path than have the public decrees of those who claim to be authoritative leaders of theological thought," this book is respectfully dedicated by THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. ROME, in its different phases, occupies the largest place of any national name in history. Rome, considered with reference to government, is interesting and important. Considered with reference to religion, it is yet more in- teresting and more important. But when considered with reference to the interrelationship of government and re- ligion, it is most interesting and most important. It is Rome in this last phase that is the principal subject of study in this book. As in this particular Rome occupies one extreme and the United States of America the other, the latter is con- sidered also, though the plan and limit of the book has made it necessary to give less space to this than the subject deserves. The principle of Rome in all its phases is that religion and government are inseparable. The principle of the gov- ernment of the United States is that religion is essentially distinct and totally separate from civil government, and entirely exempt from its cognizance. The principle of Rome is the abject slavery of the mind ; the principle of the United States of America is the absolute freedom of the mind. As it was Christianity that first and always antagonized this governmental principle of Rome, and established the governmental principle of the United States of America, the fundamental idea, the one thread-thought of the whole book, is to develop the principles of Christianity with refer- ence to civil government, and to portray the mischievous results of the least departure from those principles. 15] CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. Capital and labor Electoral corruption Anti-monopoly legislation The distribution of the land Senatorial corruption and State charity Caius Gracchus is killed The consulship of Marius More State charity and the social war Revolt in the East Bloody strifes in the city Dictatorship of Sulla Sulla, Ponipey, and Caesar Ponipey and Crassus, consuls Land monopoly and anti- poverty reform. ........ 17-46 CHAPTER II. THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. The Senate offends Caesar Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar The con- sulate of Caesar Reform by law The triumvirate dissolved Legal government at an end Caesar crosses the Rubicon Caesar dictator, demi-god, and deity Caesar's government The murder of Csesar Octavius presents himself Plot, counterplot, and war Octavius becomes consul The triumvirs enter Rome "The saviors of their country " Antony and Cleopatra. . 47-80 CHAPTER III. THE ROMAN MONARCHY. The father of the people The accession of Tiberius The enemy of public liberty A furious and cvushing despotism Accession of Caligula Caligula imitates the gods Caligula's prodigality The delirium of power Claudius and his wives Messaliua's depravity Agrippina the tigress Roman society in general Ultimate paganism. 81-108 [7] 8 CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." Roman law and the Jews The persecution by Nero Government of Domitian Pliny and the Christians Government of Trajan Riotous attacks upon the Christians Government of Commodus Government of Septimius Severus Government of Caracalla Persecution by Maximin The persecution by Decius Chris- tianity legalized The ten persecutions a fable. . . 109-136 CHAPTER V. CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. Freedom in Jesus Christ Pagan idea of the State Rights of indi- vidual conscience Christians subject to civil authority The limits of State jurisdiction The Roman religion The Roman laws Sources of persecution Superstition and selfishness The gov- ernors of provinces State self-preservation State religion means persecution Christianity victorious Christianity means rights of conscience. . ........ 137-166 CHAPTER VI. THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. The persecution under Diocletian The attack is begun Afflictions of the persecutors Rome surrenders Six emperors at once Roman embassies to Constantino The Edict of Milan. . . 167-182 CHAPTER VII. ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. The secret of sun worship The rites of sun worship Sun worship in the mysteries Jehovah condemns sun worship Sun worship in Judah Sun worship destroys the kingdom Sun worship of Au- gustus and Elagabalus Aurelian's temple to the sun Constantine a worshiper of the sun. ....... 183-202 CHAPTER VIII. THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. The root of the apostasy Heathen rites adopted The mysteries The forms of sun worship adopted Rome exalts Sunday Heathen philosophy adopted Clement's philosophic mysticism Origen's philosophic mysticism Imperial aims at religious unity Paganism and the apostasy alike The two streams unite in Constantine. 203-226 CONTENTS. 9 CHAPTER IX. THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. "All ye are brethren" A clerical aristocracy created Bishopric of Rome asserts pre-eminence Contentions in Rome and Carthage The bishops usurp the place of Christ An episcopal Punic War The bishopric of Antioch Disgraceful character of the bishopric. 227-244 CHAPTER X. THE RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE. His low utilitarianism Pagan and apostate Christian His perjurj r and cruelty Many times a murderer The true cross and Coustantine Is this paganism or Christianity ? A murderer even in death Little better than a pagan. ...... 245-262 CHAPTER XI. CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. The new theocracy The new Israel delivered Final war with Licin- ius Original State chaplaincies The bishops and the emperor Constantine sent to heaven The mystery of iniquity. . 263-278 CHAPTER XII. THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. A false unity The Catholic Church established Which is the Catholic Church? Councils to decide the question The Donatists appeal to the emperor The State becomes partisan Clergy exempt from public offices Fruits of the exemption The church of the masses The church a mass of hypocrites. .... 279-300 CHAPTER XIII. THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. Israel rejects the Lord as king The Lord would not forsake the people The kingdom not of this world The new and false theocracy Constantine's Sunday law Sunday legislation is religious only The empire a "kingdom of God" By authority of Pontifex Maxi- mus Council of Nice against the Jews Sabbath-keepers accursed from Christ All exemption abolished The church obtains the monopoly Origin of the Inquisition 301-328 10 CONTENTS. CHAPTEK XIY. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH. The Trinitarian Controversy Homoousion or Homoiousion ? The secret of the controversy Constantino's design Constantine's task The Council of Nice Character of the bishops Constantine's place in the council The framing of the creed The creed and its adoption Their own estimate of the creed The true estimate of the council 329-354 CHAPTER XV. ARIANISM BECOMES ORTHODOX. Arius returned ; Athanasius banished Athanasius is returned and again banished Macedonius made bishop of Constantinople General Council of Sardica Athanasius again returned General councils of Aries and Milan The bishop of Borne is banished Hosius forced to become Arian Athanasius again removed Liberius be- comes Arian and is recalled Double council ; Rimini and Seleucia The emperor's creed declared heretical The world becomes Arian. 355-382 CHAPTER XVI. THE CATHOLIC FAITH RE-ESTABLISHED. Jovian, Valentinian, and Valens The contentions begin again The order of the hierarchy Gregory, bishop of Constantinople The Meletian schism The Council of Constantinople- Council of Aquileia Penalties upon heretics The empire is "converted." . . . 383-402 CHAPTER XVII. MARY IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. Chrysostom deposed and banished Chrysostom recalled and again ban- ished A general council demanded Cyril of Alexandria Nes- torius of Constantinople Cyril and Nestorious at war The bishop of Rome joins Cyril General Council of Ephesus Condemnation of Nestorius Council against council All alike orthodox Cyril bribes the court and wins. 403-428 CONTENTS. 11 CHAPTER XVIII. THE EUTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. The controversy begins Eusebius in a dilemma Forecast of the In- quisition- A general council is demanded The second general Council of Ephesus Eutyches is declared orthodox The unity of the council Peace is declared restored. . . . 429-446 CHAPTER XIX. THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. Pretensions of the bishops of Rome "Irrevocable" and "universal" Leo demands another council The general Council of Chal- cedou "A frightful storm " Condemnation of Dioscorus Leo's letter the test Leo's letter approved Leo's letter "the true faith " Unity of the council is created Leo's doctrine seals the creed The creed of Leo and Chalcedon Royalty ratifies the creed The council to Leo Imperial edicts enforce the creed Leo "confirms" the creed The work of the four councils. 447-482 CHAPTER XX. THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. Events that favored the papacy The bishops censors of magistrates The Bible is made the code The bishopric a political office The worst characters become bishops The episcopal dictatorship Civil government vanishes 483-498 CHAPTER XXI. THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. The bishopric of Rome Pride of the bishops and clergy Vices of clergy and people Abominations of sun worship continued Heathen practices in the church Monkish virtue made prevalent Hypocrisy and fraud made habitual Pure, unmingled natural- ism Destruction and devastation No remedy, and final ruin. 499-520 12 CONTENTS. CHAPTER XXII. THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. The papacy and the barbarians The "conversion" of Clovis The "holy "wars of Clovis Such conversion was worse corruption She destroys those she cannot corrupt Destruction of the Heru- lian kingdom Theodoric's rule of Italy Papal proceedings in Rome The pope put above the State Conspiracies against the Ostrogoths The accession of Justinian The Trisagion contro- versy Justinian joins in the controversy The Vandal kingdom uprooted The Ostrogothic kingdom destroyed Temporal author- ity of the papacy The Lombards invade Italy The pope appeals to France The pope anoints Pepin king Pepin's gift to the papacy The pope makes Charlemagne emperor The papacy made supreme The germ of the entire papacy. . 521-568 CHAPTER XXIII. PEOTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. The papal power and Luther's protection The principles of Protest- antism Protestantism is Christianity Zwingle as a Reformer Henry VIII against Luther Luther against the papacy Henry divorces the pope Religious rights in England The Calvinistic theocracy Calvin's Despotism Religious despotism in Scot- land The rise of the Puritans Puritan designs upon England Elizabeth persecutes the Puritans Origin of the Congregationalists Puritan government of New England New England Puritan principles Roger Williams against Puritanism Banishment of Roger Williams John Wheelright and his preaching Wheelright is banished The Puritan inquisition Puritan covenant of grace -Mrs. Hutchinson is condemned The inquisition continues Planting of Connecticut and New Haven The theocracy is completed Laws against the Baptists The Baptist principles The whipping of Elder Holmes The persecutors justify them selves Thomas Gould and his brethren Another remonstrance from England First treatment of Quakers First law against Quakers Rhode Island's glorious appeal Horrible laws against the Quakers Horrible tortures of Quakers The people effect a rescue Children sold as slaves The death penalty is defeated " A humaner policy"- The people rescue the sufferers Laws of New Haven and Connecticut John Wesley prosecuted Martin Luther and Roger Williams 569-662 CONTENTS. 13 CHAPTER XXIV. THE NEW REPUBLIC. Civil government wholly impersonal It is the scriptural idea How are the powers that be, ordained The American doctrine is script- ural The Declaration asserts the truth Government and religion rightly separate Governmental authority not religious Daniel and the government It is intentionally so The Presbytery of Hanover Their second memorial Madison's Memorial and Re- monstrance Christianity does not need it It undermines public authority Virginia delivered Ratification of the Constitution The Christian idea. 663-698 CHAPTER XXV. THE GKEAT CONSPIRACY. The Constitution denounced A religious amendment proposed The National Reform Association Proposed national hypocrisy The two " spheres" The National Reform theocracy -7 The new king- dom of God What they propose to do An official announcement Speech of Mrs. Woodbridge Prohibition joins the procession Principles of National Prohibition party Origin of the American Sabbath Union Church and State to be united The whole scheme is theocratical Anti- American and anti-Christian An- other strong ally When the Church awakes They despise the declaration 699-728 CHAPTER XXVI. THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. Papacy in the public schools National Reform "petitioning" The bond of union The authority for Sunday observance How Sun- day came in No "Thus saith the Lord" That "miserable ex- cuse" Dr. McAllister and Pope Pelagius They do persecute "The good seed "Inalienable right. . . . 729-752 CHAPTER XXVII. THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. Encroachments upon the Constitution Reaction in interests of the pa- pacy Hypocrisy and ruin the consequence The answer has been given February 29, 1892 Are all the people Christians ? The purposes of the British sovereigns Logical substance of the argu- ment The decisive point " Conectecotte " and Pennsylvania- Perversion of the Declaration What is the nation ? Religion in 14 CONTENTS. the States Does the Constitution mean this ? The absurdity of it State authority not national authority The "new order of things " reversed The image of the papacy A. D. 313-323 and 1892 The rights of the people Such a decision prohibited The decisions of 1856 and 1892. . ... 753-800 CHAPTER XXVIII. THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. ''Petitioning" by threats A senatorial theological discussion The words of the surrender "The Sabbath day " Congress interprets the Bible Congress against the word of God The subjection of the people "The voice of religion" Those who protested The Constitution excluded How they " asserted themselves " The un- deniable record. ..... 801-826 CHAPTER XXIX. WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS ? " Preserving the public order" It is not Christianity Supreme law- lessness To save the nation The polity of Rome The Catholic Church and America "The State's Christianity" The nation's perfection Leo's charge and Satolli's mission "Stamped for a Catholic land" Rome and America Rome and labor troubles The " Saviour from the Vatican " Bishop Coxe to Satolli A per- tinent fable She will not dismount The National Reformers' in- quiry "A menace to liberty" "Half-heathenish Christianity "- Are they suspicious ? Where the responsibility lies. . 827-870 CHAPTER XXX. THE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY. The arbitrary authority of the Church The Council of Trent "Tra- dition signifies continuing inspiration " Principles of the Reforma- tion Marks of apostasy "Come out of her, my people" The day of the Lord cometh Description of the papacy The place of the image of the beast The making of the image The Sab- bath a sign of God's power The United States "A Catholic Nation" ! What shall we do ? Our Victory Sure. . 871-899 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PORTRAIT OP AUTHOR . . . Frontispiece. THE RUINS OF CARTHAGE . . . * ... 22 MARIUS AND SULLA . ........ 36 RUINS OF THE FORUM ...... ... 38 POMPEY THE GREAT ......... 41 JULIUS (LESAR (Headj ....... . .42 ROME MISTRESS OF THE WOULD ...... 46 ROMAN AUGURS .......... 54 POMPEY'S THEATER . . ..... 57 JULIUS C^SAR (Statue) . ... 63 THE MURDER OF CAESAR .... . .67 OCTAVIUS AND LiEPIDUS . 73 ANTONY AND OCTAVIA 77 9 CLEOPATKA GOING TO MEET ANTONY ..... 79 BATTLE OF ACTIUM ...... . . . 80 AUGUSTUS .......... 82 TIBERIUS ...... .... 85 TIBERIUS AT CAPRI . ..... 89 CALIGULA ... ....... 91 TEMPLE OF JUPITER . . .... 93 CLAUDIUS ...... .... 97 MESSALINA AND AGRIPPINA . . 103 GLADIATORS SALUTING TIII-: EMPEROU . . . 106 AGRIPPINA, LIVIA, CLAUDIUS. TIBERIUS, NERO AND DOMITIAN . . . .... 114 TRAJAN AND HADRIAN ....... 117 ANTONINUS Pius .......... 121 MARCUS AURELIUS AND COMMODUS ...... 122 SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS ......... 124 MAXIMIN . ...... .... 127 DECIUS . . . . . ... 129 [15] 16 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. GALLIENUS 133 AURELIAN 134 ARCH OP AUGUSTUS .... 142 THE CIRCUS MAXIMUS ... . 150 DIOCLETIAN .... 168 HERCULES 184 APOLLO AND DIANA OF THE EPHESIANS . . . 186 BACCHUS AND CYBELE .... 189 VENUS AND ASTARTE .... 193 WEEPING FOR TAMMUZ AND ASIIERES (Groves) .... 196 ELAGABALUS ....... 198 TEMPLE OF THE SUN AT ROME 200 THE SUN 202 CERES AND BACCHUS 208 CONSTANTINE (Head) 245 ARCH OF CONSTANTINE ...... 249 CHURCH OF THE " HOLY SEPULCHRE " 255 CONSTANTINE (Statue) AND ROME DEIFIED 262 THE EMPEROR HONORIUS GRANTING AUDIENCE .... 325 THE COUNCIL OF NICB 347 CONSTANTINOPLE (Modern) 394 REJOICINGS THAT MARY is MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD . . 423 PEACE is RESTORED ...... . 445 " A FRIGHTFUL STORM " .... 458 MITHRA SACRIFICING THE BULL .... . 507 EVOLUTION OF THE "PICTURES OF CHRIST " 508 JUSTINIAN 543 BELISARIUS ENTERING ROME ....... 551 GREGORY THE GREAT 555 CHURCH OF ST. PETER, ROME 560 ENTRY OF POPE JOHN INTO CONSTANCE. ..... 566 THE CITY OF ROME 568 LUTHER ..... 572 HENRY VIII 579 JOHN CALVIN ... . 586 THE SIGNING OF THE DECLARATION ...... 663 PRESENTING THE SUNDAY-LAW PETITION 733 "TiiE CAPITOL OF THE MODERN WORLD" . 760 THE TWO REPUBLICS. CHAPTER I. THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. WITH the exception of Britain, all the permanent con- quests of Rome were made by the arms of the repub- lic, which, though ' ' sometimes vanquished in battle, " were " always victorious in war." But as Roman power increased, Roman virtue declined ; and of all forms of government, the stability of the republican depends most upon the integrity of the individual. The immortal Lincoln's definition of a republic is the best that can ever be given : "A government of the people, by the people, and for the people." A repub- lic is a government "of the people " the people compose the government. The people are governed by "the people " by themselves. They are governed by the people, "for the people " they are governed by themselves, for them- selves. Such a government is but self-government ; each citizen governs himself, by himself, by his own powers of self-restraint, and he does this for himself, for his own good, for his own best interests. In proportion as this con- ception is not fulfilled, in proportion as the people lose the power of governing themselves, in the same proportion the true idea of a republic will fail of realization. It is said of the early Romans that ' ' they possessed the faculty of self-government beyond any people of whom we 2 [17] 18 THE LAST DATS OF THE REPUBLIC. have historical knowledge," with the sole exception of the Anglo-Saxons. And by virtue of this, in the very nature of the case they became the most powerful nation of all ancient times. But their extensive conquests filled Rome with gold. With wealth came luxury ; as said Juvenal, " Luxury came on more cruel than our arms, And avenged the vanquished world with her charms." In the train of luxury came vice ; self-restraint was broken down ; the power of self-government was lost ; and the Roman republic failed, as every other republic will fail, when that fails by virtue of which alone a republic is pos- sible. The Romans ceased to govern themselves, and they had to be governed. They lost the faculty of self-govern- ment, and with that vanished the republic, and its place was supplied by an imperial tyranny supported by a military despotism. In the second Punic War, Rome's victories had reduced the mighty Carthage, B. c. 201, to the condition of a mere mercantile town ; and within a few years afterward she had spread her conquests round the whole coast of the Mediter- ranean Sea, and had made herself "the supreme tribunal in the last resort between kings and nations." "The south- east of Spain, the coast of France from the Pyrenees to Nice, the north of Italy, Illyria and Greece, Sardinia, Sicily, and the Greek islands, the southern and western shores of Asia Minor, were Roman provinces, governed directly under Ro- man magistrates. On the African side, Mauritania (Mo- rocco) was still free. Numidia .(the modern Algeria) re- tained its native dynasty, but was a Roman dependency. The Carthaginian dominions, Tunis and Tripoli, had been annexed to the empire. The interior of Asia Minor up to the Euphrates, with Syria and Egypt, was under sover- eigns called allies, but, like the native princes in India, subject to a Roman protectorate. Over this enormous CAPITAL AND LABOR. 19 territory, rich with the accumulated treasures of centuries, and inhabited by thriving, industrious races, the energetic Roman men of business had spread and settled themselves, gathering into their hands the trade, the financial adminis- tration, the entire commercial control, of the Mediterranean basin. They had been trained in thrift and economy, in abhorrence of debt, in strictest habits of close and careful management. Their frugal education, their early lessons in the value of money, good and excellent as those lessons were, led them as a matter of course, to turn to account their extraordinary opportunities. Governors with their staffs, permanent officials, contractors for the revenue, negotiators, bill-brokers, bankers, merchants, were scat- tered everywhere in thousands. Money poured in upon them in rolling streams of gold." Froude. 1 The actual administrative powers of the government were held by the body of the senators, who held office for life. The Senate had control of the public treasury, and into its hands went not only the regular public revenue from all sources, but also the immense spoil of plundered cities and conquered provinces. With the Senate lay also the appoint- ment, and from its own ranks, too, of all the governors of provinces ; and a governorship was the goal of wealth. A governor could go out from Rome poor, perhaps a bankrupt, hold his province for one, two, or three years, and return with millions. The inevitable result was that the senatorial families and leading commoners built up themselves into an aristocracy of wealth ever increasing. Owing to the oppor- tunities for accumulating wealth in the provinces much more rapidly than at home, many of the most enterprising citizens sold their farms and left Italy. The farms were bought up by the Roman capitalists, and the small holdings were merged into vast estates. Besides this, the public lands were leased on easy terms by the Senate to persons of polit- ical influence, who by the lapse of time, had come to regard the land as their own by right of occupation. The Licinian 1 " Caesar," chap, ii, par. 6. 20 'flTH LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. law passed in 367 B. c., provided that no one should occupy more than three hundred and thirty-three acres of the public lands ; and that every occupant should employ a certain proportion of free laborers. But at the end of two hundred years these favored holders had gone far beyond the law in both of these points : they extended their holdings beyond the limits prescribed by the law ; and they employed no free laborers at all, but worked their holdings by slave labor wholly. Nor w r as this confined to the occupiers of the public lands ; all wealthy land owners worked their land by slaves. In the Roman conquests, when prisoners were taken in battle or upon the capture or the unconditional surrender of a city, they were all sold as slaves. They were not slaves such as were in the Southern States of the United States in slavery times. They were Spaniards, Gauls, Greeks, Asi- atics, and Carthaginians. Of course they were made up of all classes, yet many of them were intelligent, trained, and skillful ; and often among them would be found those who were well educated. These were bought up by the wealthy Romans by the thousands. The skilled mechanics and ar- tisans among them were employed in their owners' work- shops established in Rome ; the others were spread over the vast landed estates, covering them with vineyards, orchards, olive gardens, and the products of general agriculture ; and all increasing their owners' immense incomes. "Wealth poured in more and more, and luxury grew more un- bounded. Palaces sprang up in the city, castles in the country, villas at pleasant places by the sea, and parks, and fish-ponds, and game preserves, and gardens, and vast ret- inues of servants," everywhere. The effect of all this ab- sorbing of the land, whether public or private, into great estates worked by slaves, was to crowd the free laborers off the lands and into the large towns, and into Rome above all. There they found every trade and occupation filled ELECTORAL CORRUPTION. 21 with slaves, whose labor only increased the wealth of the millionaire, and with which it was impossible successfully to compete. The only alternative was to fall into the train of the political agitator, become the stepping-stone to his ambi- tion, sell their votes to the highest bidder, and perhaps have a share in the promised more equable division of the good things which were monopolized by the rich. For, to get money by any means lawful or unlawful, had become the universal passion. "Money was the one thought from the highest senator to the poorest wretch who sold his vote in the Comitia. For money judges gave unjust decrees, and juries gave corrupt verdicts." Froude* It has been well said that, "With all his wealth, there were but two things which the Roman no- ble could buy political power and luxury." Froude* And the poor Roman had but one thing that he could sell his vote. Consequently with the rich, able only to buy political power, and with the poor, able only to sell his vote, the elections once pure, became matters of annual bargain and sale between the candidates and the voters. ' ' To obtain a province was the first ambition of a Roman noble. The road to it lay through the praetor- ship and the consulship ; these offices, therefore, became the prizes of the State ; and being in the gift of the people, they were sought after by means which demoral- ized alike the givers and the receivers. The elections were managed by clubs and coteries ; and, except on oc- casions of national danger or political excitement, those who spent most freely were most certain of success. Under these conditions the chief powers in the commonwealth necessarily centered in the rich. There was no longer an aristocracy of birth, still less of virtue. . . . But the door of promotion was open to all who had the golden key. The great commoners bought their way into the magistra- cies. From the magistracies they passed into the Senate. " z Id., par. 8. a ld., par. 7. 22 THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. froude.* And from the Senate they passed to the gov- ernorship of a province. To obtain the first office in the line of promotion to the governorship, men would exhaust every resource, and plunge into what would otherwise have been hopeless in- debtedness. Yet having obtained the governorship, when they returned, they were fully able to pay all their debts, and still be millionaires. "The highest offices of State were open in theory to the meanest citizen ; they were confined, in fact, to those who had the longest purses, or the most ready use of the tongue on popular platforms. Distinctions of birth had been exchanged for distinctions of wealth. The struggle between plebeians and patricians for equality of privilege was over, and a new division had been formed between the party of property and a party who desired a change in the structure of society." Froude. 5 Such was the condition of things, B. o., 146, when the ruin of Carthage left Rome with no fear of a rival to her supremacy. Senatorial power was the sure road to wealth. The way to this was through the prastorship and the consul- ship. These offices were the gift of the populace through election by popular vote. The votes of the great body of the populace were for sale ; and as only those who could con- trol sufficient wealth were able to buy enough votes to elect, the sure result was, of course, that all the real powers of the government were held by the aristocracy of wealth. Then as these used their power to increase their own wealth and that of their favorites, and only used their wealth to per- petuate their power, another sure result was the growth of jealousy on the part of the populace, and a demand constantly growing louder and more urgent, that there should be a more equable division of the good things of life which were monopolized by the favored few. "All orders in a society may be wise and virtuous, but all cannot be rich. Wealth which is used only for idle luxury is always envied, and * Id., par. 8, 9. 6 Id., chap. 1, par. 5. ANTI-MONOPOLY LEGISLATION. 23 envy soon curdles into hate. It is easy to persuade the masses that the good things of this world are unjustly di- vided, especially when it happens to be the exact truth. "- Froude* And as these two classes were constantly growing far- ther apart, the rich growing richer and the poor, poorer, there ceased to be any middle class to maintain order in government and society by holding the balance of power. There remained only the two classes, the rich and the poor, and of these the rich despised the poor and the poor envied the rich. And there were always plenty of men to stir up the discontent of the masses, and present schemes for the reorganization of society and government. Some of these were well meaning men, men who really had in view the good of their fellow-men, but the far greater number were mere demagogues, ambitious schemers who used the discontent of the populace only to lift themselves into the places of wealth and power which they envied others, and which, when they had secured, they used as selfishly and as oppressively as did any of those against whom they clamored. But whether they were well meaning men or demagogues, in order to hold the populace against the persuasions and bribes of the wealthy, they were compelled to make promises and concessions, which were only in the nature of larger bribes, and which in the end were as de- structive of free government as the worst acts of the Senate itself. In the long contest between the people and the Senate, which ended in the establishment of an imperial form of government, the first decisive step was taken by Tiberius Gracchus, who was elected tribune of the people in the year 133 B. c. On his way home from Spain shortly before, as he passed through Tuscany, he saw in full operation the large estate system carried on by the wealthy senators or their favorites, the public lands unlawfully leased in great 6 Id., chap. 11, par. 9. 24 THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. tracts, "the fields cultivated by the slave gangs, the free citizens of the republic thrust away into the towns, aliens and outcasts in their own country, without a foot of soil which they could call their own." He at once determined that the public lands should be restored to the people ; and as soon as he was elected tribune, he set to work to put his views into law. As the government was of the people, if the people were only united they could carry any measure they pleased, in spite of the Senate. As the senators and their wealthy favorites were the offenders, it was evident that if any such law should be secured, it would have to be wholly by the people's overriding the Senate ; and to the people Tiberius Gracchus directly appealed. He declared that the public land belonged to the people, demanded that the monopolists should be removed, and that the public lands should be re-distributed among the citizens of Rome. The monopolists argued that they had leased the land from the Senate, and had made their investments on the faith that the law was no longer of force. Besides this they declared that as they were then occupying the lands, and as the lands had been so occupied for ages before, with the sanction of the government, to call in question their titles now, was to strike at the very foundations of society. Tiberius and his party replied only by pointing to the statute which stood unrepealed, and showing that how- ever long the present system had been worked, it was illegal and void from the beginning. Yet Tiberius did not presume to be arbitrary. He pro- posed to pay the holders for their improvements ; but as for the public land itself, it belonged to the people, and to the people it should go. The majority of the citizens stood by Tiberius. But another of the tribunes, Octavius Csecina by name, himself having large interests in the land question, went over to the side of the Senate ; and, in the exercise of his constitutional right, forbade the taking of the vote. From the beginning, the functions of the tribunes were that THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE LAND, 25 they should be the defenders of the people and the guardians of the rights of the people, against the encroachment of the Consulate and the Senate. And now when one of their own constitutional defenders deserted them and went over to the enemy, even though in doing it he exercised only his constitutional prerogative, this the people would not bear. It was to support an unlawful system that it was done ; the people were all-powerful, and they determined to carry their measure, constitution or no constitution. 7 Tiberius called upon them to declare Csecina deposed from the Tribunate ; they at once complied. Then they took the vote which Csecina had forbidden, and the land law of Tiberius Gracchus was secured. Three commissioners were appointed to carry into effect the provisions of the law. But from whatever cause, the choosing of the commissioners was unfortunate they were Tiberius himself, his younger brother, and his father-in-law. Being thus apparently a family affair, the aristocrats made the most of it, and bided their time ; for the tribunes were elected for only a year, and they hoped so to shape the elec- tions when the year should expire, as to regain their power. But when the year expired, Tiberius unconstitutionally pre- sented himself for re-election, and the prospect was that he would secure it. When the election day came, the aristo- crats, with their servants and hired voters, went armed to the polls ; and as soon as they saw that Tiberius would surely be chosen, they raised a riot. The people being unarmed, were driven off. Tiberius Gracchus and three hundred of his friends were killed and pitched into the Tiber. Yet though they had killed Tiberius, they did not dare to attempt at once the repeal of the law which he had secured, nor openly to interfere with the work of the com- 7 Reference to the Roman Constitution must not be understood in the Ameri- can sense, as being a written constitution. The Roman Constitution was, as is the British, merely a system of precedents and unwritten rules of long-estab- lished usage. 26 THE LAST DATS OF THE REPUBLIC. missioners in executing the law. Within two years the com- missioners had settled forty thousand families upon public lands which the monopolists had been obliged to surrender. The commissioners soon became unpopular. Those who were compelled to resign their lands were exasperated, of course. On the other hand, those to whom the land was given were not in all cases satisfied. It was certain that some would be given better pieces of land than others, and that of itself created jealousy and discontent. But the greatest trouble was, that in the great majority of cases it was not land that they wanted, in fact. It was money that they wanted first of all ; and although the land was virtually given to them and well improved at that, they could not get money out of it without work. It had to be personal work, too, because to hire slaves was against the very law by virtue of which they had received the land ; and to hire freemen was impossible, (1) because no freeman would work for a slave'-s wages that in his estimate would be to count him- self no better than a slave and, (2) the new landed pro- prietor could not afford to pay the wages demanded by free labor, because he had to meet the competition of the wealthy land owners who worked their own land with slave labor. The only alternative was for the new land-holders to work their land themselves, and do the best they could at it. But as the money did not come as fast as they wished, and as what did come was only by hard work and economical living, many of them heartily wished themselves back amid the stir and bustle of the busy towns, working for daily wages, though the wages might be small. The discontented cries soon grew loud enough to give the Senate its desired excuse to suspend the commissioners and then quietly to repeal the law, and resume its old supremacy. Just nine years after the death of Tiberius Gracchus his brother Caius was elected a tribune, and took up the work in behalf of which Tiberius had lost his life. The Senate had been jealous of him for some time, and attacked him SENATORIAL CORRUPTION AND STATE CHARITY. 27 with petty prosecutions and false accusations ; and when he was elected tribune, the Senate knew that this meant no good to it. Caius revived the land law that had been secured by his brother ten years before, but he did not stop there ; he attacked the Senate itself. All important State cases, whether civil or criminal, were tried before a court com- posed of senators about sixty or seventy. This privilege also the senators had turned to their own profit by selling their verdicts. It was no secret that the average senatorial juryman was approachable with money ; if not in the form of a direct bribe, there were many other ways in which a wealthy senator could make his influence felt. Governors could plunder their provinces, rob temples, sell their author- ity, and carry away everything they could lay hands on ; yet, although in the eyes of the law these were the gravest offenses, when they returned to Rome, they could admit their fellow-senators to a share in their stealings, and rest per- fectly secure. If the plundered provincials came up to Rome with charges against a governor, the charges had to be passed upon by a board of senators who had either been governors themselves or else were only waiting for the first chance to become governors, and a case had to be one of special hardship and notorious at that, before any notice would be taken of it in any effective way. The general course was only to show that the law was a mockery where the rich and influential were concerned. At this system of corruption, Caius Gracchus aimed a successful blow. He carried a law disqualifying forever any senator from -sitting on a jury of any kind, and transferring these judicial func- tions to the equites, or knights. The knights were an order of men below the dignity of senators, yet they had to be possessed of a certain amount of wealth to be eligible to the order. By this measure, Caius bound .to himself the whole body of the knights. But these attacks upon the Senate, successful though they were, and these favors to the knights, were of no direct 28 THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. benefit to the people ; therefore to maintain his position with them, Caius was obliged to do something that would be so directly in their favor that there could be no mistaking it. It was not enough that he should restore the land law that had been secured by his brother. That law, even while it was being worked at its best, was satisfactory to but few of its beneficiaries. The law was restored, it is true, but the prospect of leaving Rome and going perhaps to some dis- tant part of Italy to engage in hard work, was not much of a temptation to men who had spent any length of time in Rome, involved in its political strifes, and whose principal desire was to obtain money and the means of subsistence with as little work as possible. It required something more than the restoration of the land law to satisfy these, and Caius granted it. With the "enthusiastic clapping" of every pair of poor hands in Rome, he secured the passage of a law decreeing that there should be established in Rome, public granaries to be filled and maintained at the cost of the State, and that from these the wheat should be sold to the poor citizens, at a merely nominal price. This law applied only to Rome, because in Rome the elections were held. " The effect was to gather into the city a mob of needy, unemployed voters, living on the charity of the State, to crowd the circus and to clamor at the elections, available no doubt immediately to strengthen the hands of the popular tribune, but certain in the long run to sell themselves to those who could bid high- est for their voices." Fronde* We have already seen that the only stock in trade of the poor citizen was his vote, and the effect of this law was greatly to increase the value of that commodity ; because as now he was virtually supported by the State, he became more nearly independent, and could easily devote more time to political agitation, and could de- mand larger returns for his influence and his vote. But Caius carried his law, and so bound to himself, and greatly multiplied, too, the mass of voters in Rome ; and having 8 "Caesar," chap, iii, par. 5. CAIUS GRACCHUS IS KILLED, 29 secured the support of both the knights and the populace, he carried all before him, and was even re-elected to the Tribunate, and could have been elected the third time ; but he proposed a scheme that estranged the mob, and his power departed. He proposed that in different parts of the empire, Roman colonies should be established with all the privileges of Roman citizenship, and one of these places was Carthage. That city, while it existed, had always been the greatest earthly menace to Rome, and when it had been reduced to ashes and the Roman plowshare drawn over it, it was cursed forever. And now the mere suggestion to restore it was magnified by Caius's enemies to a height that made the proposition appear but little short of treason. This of itself, however, might not have defeated him ; but if this coloniza- tion scheme was carried out, many of the populace would have to leave Rome and go to some distant part of the em- pire : and worse than all else, they would have to work. No longer could they be fed at the public expense and spend their lives in the capital, in the whirl of political excitement and the amusements of the Roman circus. Even to contem- plate such a prospect was intolerable ; still more, and as though Caius deliberately designed to add insult to injury, he proposed to bestow the franchise upon all the freemen of Italy. This would be only to cut down in an unknown ratio the value of the votes of those who now possessed the fran chise. Such a calamity as that never could be borne. The course of the Senate might have been one of misrule, but this of Caius Gracchus was fast developing into unbearable despotism. The election day came, riots were raised, and Caius Gracchus and three thousand of his friends were killed, as had been his brother and his friends ten years before. The mob having now no leader, the Senate resumed its sway as before, and went on in the same old way, except that the laws actually passed by Caius had to stand. It was not long, however, before the Senate was put to a test which 30 TEE LAST DATS OF THE REPUBLIC. effectually exposed its utter incompetency to rule the Roman State. West of the Carthaginian province of Rome, lay the kingdom of Numidia, over which the Roman power extended its protectorate. Miscipsa was king. He had two sons, Hiempsal and Adherbal, and an illegitimate nephew, Jugur- tha. Miscipsa died B. c. 118, and left his kingdom jointly to the three young men. Jugurtha at once murdered Hiemp- sal, and attacked Adherbal. Adherbal appealed to Rome, but Jugurtha had already made himself safe with the Senate. The Senate sent out commissioners, Jugurtha bribed them, and they went home again. Jugurtha pushed the war, Adherbal was taken, and was killed after having been tort- ured almost to death. After the capture of Adherbal and his forces, some Roman citizens had also been taken, and after their surrender, they too were killed. This raised such a cry at Rome that the Senate was compelled at least to prom- ise an investigation ; but as no results were to be seen, one of the tribunes openly told the people that there were men in the Senate who were bribed. At this the popular indig- nation began to show itself so strongly that the Senate dared no longer to brave it, and declared war on Jugurtha. An army was sent to Africa in command of a consul. Jugurtha bribed the consul, and secured a peace on the payment of a small fine. Memmius, the same tribune who before had the courage openly to charge the Senate with taking bribes, again openly exposed in the Forum this last piece of rascality. The Senate saw the storm gathering, and once more bestirred itself to the extent of calling Jugurtha to Rome. This was only to increase the opportunities of both Jugurtha and them- selves. Jugurtha came laden with gold, and in addition to the Senate which he already owned, he bribed every one of the tribunes, except Memmius, who was proof against all his blandishments. Jugurtha had been called to Rome under a safe-conduct, and he was at last ordered back home, but the cause was not yet settled. The Senate sent over another army. But Rome had as yet no standing army, and there THE CONSULSHIP OF MARIUS. 31 had now been peace so long that the old military discipline of the citizens had completely run down. The men who were enlisted were wholly ignorant of military duty, and the officers, appointed mostly from among the rich young nobles, were more illy prepared for war than were the men. The army went to Africa, arid in about two months the half of it was destroyed, and the other half captured, by Jugurtha. About the same time, two armies were destroyed by the Gauls up on the Rhone. ' ' While the great men at Rome were building palaces, inventing new dishes, and hiring cooks at unheard-of salaries, the barbarians were at the gates of Italy." Fronde* This combination of disgraces and dangers gave such force to the popular complaints against the Senate, that it was at last aroused to a determination really to do something, and the best man that could be found Csecilius Metellus was appointed to lead a new expedition against Jugurtha. Metellus having it in mind to put an end to the Jugurthine War, chose as his second in command the ablest general that he could find, Cains Marius. Arrived in Numidia, the Roman army was successful in several battles, and Jugurtha asked for peace ; but as Metellus demanded unconditional surrender, and could not be bribed, Jugurtha drew his forces into the desert, and caused the war to drag along. As the time for the election of a consul for the next year drew on, Marius's name was mentioned as the candidate of the people. It was the law that the candidate must be present at the election, and Marius obtained the consent of Metellus to go to Rome. Election day came, B. c. 107", and although the aristocracy did all they could to defeat him, Marius was elected the first instance in a hundred years in which a consul had been chosen from the people. Metellus was re- called, and Marius was given sole command in the war with Jugurtha. He first set on foot a thorough reorganization of the military power of Rome. Up to this time, the Roman armies had been but a militia citizens called from their 3 /<*., chap, iv, par. 6. 32 THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. various occupations for service upon emergency, and return ing to their occupations as soon as the occasion was past which made their services necessary. Harms enlisted men to become professional soldiers. These he thoroughly drilled, and reduced to the strictest discipline. Thus originated the standing army of Rome, which out of the corruptions of the times at last arose to a military despotism. With such an army of well trained and well disciplined troops, Marius, before the next year was ended, had brought the Jugurthine War to a triumphant close, and Jugurtha himself was brought in chains to Rome. Marius had barely ended the trouble in Numidia, before all his skill and all the valor of his well trained legions, were urgently demanded to turn back the tide of barbarians, Cimbri and Teutons, which in two mighty streams of hundreds of thousands each, was pouring into Italy. While Marius was in Africa, the largest army that Rome had ever sent against an enemy, was by these savages swept out of existence, B. c. 107. But although the generalship of Marius was now urgently needed B. c. 104 his consulship had expired, and there was no precedent for electing the same person consul a second time. In times of imminent danger it was in the province of the Senate to suspend the constitu- tion, declare the State in danger, and appoint a dictator. But as Marius was the favorite of the populace, it was known by all that should the Senate exercise its prerogative, it would never appoint him as the dictator ; and it was also known by all that Marius was the only man who could save the State. Therefore, the people took the power into their own hands again, and virtually suspended the constitution by electing Marius consul the second time, B. c. 104. The barbarians, however, did not come at once into Italy. By some cause their erratic course was turned aside, and they swept through southern Gaul, across the Pyrenees into Spain, over northern Spain to the Atlantic, up the coast into Gaul again, across Gaul to the Seine and even to the Rhine ; MORE STATE CHARITY AND THE SOCIAL WAR. 33 and then gathering fresh force from their brethren from the wilds of Germany, the torrent rolled once more toward Italy. In this wild raid two years were consumed. In Rome the people still held sway, and Marius was elected consul a third time, and even a fourth time. He put the two years to good use in perfecting the efficiency of his legions, and drawing them up to the borders of Italy. He met the Teutons even beyond the Alps, and annihilated the whole host, July 20, B. c. 102. The Cimbri by another route passed the Alps and forced back as far as the Po, the legions under Catulus. Marius, in his absence, was elected consul the fifth time, and continued in command. He came to the rescue of Catulus. The Cimbri were utterly destroyed (B. c. 101, summer), and Italy was saved. Marius was the idol of the people ; they prided themselves upon saving the country by him, and they elected him consul the sixth time, B. c. 100. But Rome was no sooner free once more from the danger of a foreign foe, than by civil strife and political violence she began to prey again upon her own vitals. Besides Marius, the two favorites of the people just at this time were Saturninus, a tribune, and Glaucia, a praetor. With these Marius allied himself. They were all powerful, and passed, (1) another land law dividing up portions of the public do- main among the veterans of Marius ; (2) a law establishing colonies in Sicily, Achaia, and Macedonia ; (3) a law reduc- ing as low as two cents a peck, the price of wheat from the public granaries ; and, (4) to cap it all, they passed a vote that all the senators should take an oath to execute these laws under penalty of fine and expulsion from the Senate. All this was done in the midst of riot, tumult, and bloodshed. Metellus alone, of all the senators, refused to take the oath to execute these laws. Saturninus had him dragged out of the Senate house and expelled from the city. Yet there was not entire harmony in the popular party. There were rival candidates and consequent jealousies. Saturninus and Glaucia were in the full tide of success, and would brook no rivals. 34 THE LAST DATS OF THE REPUBLIC. Memmius stood for the consulship at the same time that Glaucia was a candidate for that office. As it appeared that Memmius would be elected, he was murdered. At this, both Saturninus and Glaucia were declared public enemies. They took refuge in the capitol, and barricaded it. The aristocrats laid siege to them ; Marius interceded, and they surrendered to him. They were confined in an apartment of the Senate house to be held for trial. The aristocrats tore off the roof, and pelted them to death with stones and tiles. It will be remembered that in the tribunate of Caius Gracchus B. c. 123 the corruption of justice by the sena- tors had made it necessary to deprive them of the right to sit on juries, and that this privilege was bestowed upon the knights. Yet within about thirty years the same evil had grown to such a height among the knights as to call loudly for a reform. Accordingly, in B. c. 91, Marcus Divius Drusus, a tribune, brought forward a proposal to reform the law courts, and thereby incurred the deadly enmity of the whole Equestrian order. With this he proposed both new land laws and new corn laws, which increased the hatred of the senatorial order toward the populace. These laws were passed, but the Senate declared them null and void. Drusus had also entered into negotiations with the Italians to secure for them Roman citizenship. He was denounced in the Senate house as a traitor, and on his way home was assas- sinated. The Italians seeing their last hope was gone, rose in rebellion, and set about to form a new State of their own to be called Italia. They had long borne an equal share in the burdens of the State ; they had helped to subdue Jugurtha, and had borne an important part in the defeat of the barba- rian host. They were now determined that if they were to bear an equal share in the burdens of the State, they would have a voice, too, in the affairs of the State ; and if they could not have it in the Roman State, they would have it in one of their own. Rome was determined not to allow this REVOLT IN THE EAST. 35 if she could avoid it. But in the war which followed, the first campaigns were disastrous to the Roman arms, and although some successes were afterwards gained, they were not decisive ; she soon found her treasury empty, and found disaffection springing up in districts that had not revolted. Drusus had been murdered in 91 ; the war for the franchise immediately followed, and Rome's dangers and distresses became so threatening that in the latter part of the year 90, a law was passed granting the franchise to all the Italian communities which should within sixty days hand in their names to the praetor in Rome ; and a third law was passed shortly afterward empowering the Roman magistrates in the field to bestow the franchise upon all who would receive it. In this way the forces of the insurgents were so weakened that the war was soon closed. The close of war in the field was only the signal ,for the renewal of strife in the political arena of the city. All the old quarrels were renewed with increased bitterness, and the lately enfranchised Italians were a new element in the strife. Their voting power was incorporated with that of tribes already existing, which was only to rob them of a large share of the value of their votes. This made them discontented from the very beginning. Added to all the bitterness of factions, and the rivalries of all classes who had any political power at all, there was now wide-spread distress and ruin that affected all classes. And besides all this, Mithradates, king of Pontus, taking advantage of the social war in Italy, had set out to reduce all the East in sub- jection to himself. The Roman governors had made such a tyrannical use of their power that all the provinces of the "East were ready to revolt at the first fair opportunity that offered. The fleets of Mithradates, coming out over the Black Sea, poured through the Hellespont and the Darda- nelles into the Grecian Archipelago. All the islands, and the provinces of Ionia, Caria, and Lydia, taking advantage of this, rose at once in determined revolt, and put to death 36 THE LAST DATS OF THE REPUBLIC. many thousands of the Roman residents. Not only the gov- ernors, but the merchants, the bankers, and the farmers of the taxes, with their families, were promiscuously murdered. Mithradates himself, with a powerful army, followed close upon the success of his fleet, crossed the Bosphorus, and penetrated into Greece, which received him as a deliv- erer. All this compelled Rome to declare war upon Mith- radates ; but this was only to deepen her own local contests ; because there was bitter rivalry and contention as to who should command the armies to be sent against Mithradates. Marius was still a great favorite, but there was now a strong rival to his popularity in the- person of Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Sulla had been one of Marius's best assistants in putting an end to the Jugurthine "War, and also in defeating the Teutons and the Cimbri. He made himself the favorite of the soldiers by allowing them to indulge "in plundering and in all kinds of license. " Before the social war he had already made one journey into the East with an army, had defeated one of the generals of Mithradates, had restored, for a time, order in the Eastern provinces, and had received an embassy from the Parthians, which was sent to solicit an alliance with Rome, B. c. 92. He returned to Rome in 91, and both he and Marius were given command in the war with the Italians. Sulla's success was more marked than that of Marius, and there were not those lacking who would stir up jealousy between the two commanders by claiming that Marius's success against Jugurtha and the barbarians was more owing to the abilities of Sulla than to his own. Sulla was one of the aristocracy, "a patrician of the pur- est blood," but he had made an immense bid for the favor of the populace by exhibiting in the arena a hundred African lions. t Everybody in Rome, and, for that matter, in all Italy, knew that the contest for the command of the troops in the Mithradatic War, lay between Marius and Sulla ; and every one knew that the contest stood, Sulla and the senatorial BLOODY STRIPES IN THE CITY. 37 party against Marius and the people. The contest deepened, and it was more and more evident that, in the existing state of things, it could not be decided without a crisis. A trib- une Sulpicius Rufus proposed for adoption a series of laws : (1) that Marius should be given command in the Mithradatic War ; (2) that more power should be given to the newly-made citizens and more value to their votes, by increasing the number of tribes, and distributing the new citizens through all the tribes ; (3) that any senator who was in debt more than 2000 denarii (about $300), should lose his seat ; (4) and that those who had been banished on suspicion of having encouraged the Italian revolt should be recalled. These proposals only made the confusion of parties worse confounded. The proposal to give Marius the command pleased the great majority of the people ; that in favor of the new citizens, secured the influence of all these, but the proposal to increase the power of their votes was bitterly op- posed by the old voters, because it would lessen the value of their own votes. The proposal to unseat such of the sena- tors as should come within the provisions of the law, was only to raise the whole Senate to war by attempting to cur- tail its power ; and again, the proposal in favor of Marius only aroused both the Senate and Sulla to the most deter- mined opposition. But through it all it soon became evident that Rufus would carry his whole scheme. The consuls, Sulla was one of them, to prevent the legislation, pro- claimed the day a public holiday. Rufus armed his party and drove the consuls from the Forum, compelled them to withdraw the proclamation of a holiday, and carried his laws. But Sulla put himself at the head of his soldiers and marched them into the city, and ' ' for the first time a Roman consul entered the city of Rome at the head of the legions of the republic." There was resistance, but it was utterly vain. Marius escaped to Africa,. Rufus was taken and killed, and twelve others of the popular leaders put to death without a 38 THE LAST DATS OF TEE REPUBLIC. trial. Sulla, at the head of his troops and supported by the Senate, settled affairs to suit himself, and with his legions departed for the East in the beginning of the year 87" B. c. Sulla was no sooner well out of Italy than one of the consuls Cinna put himself at the head of the people, and proposed to carry out the laws of Kufus. The new citizens had assembled in crowds to exercise their right of voting. The other consul, standing for Sulla and the Senate, brought out an armed force, and commanded the assembled voters to disperse ; and because they refused, they were hewn down where they stood, and " the Forum was heaped high with the bodies of the slain." " Such a scene of slaughter had never been witnessed in Rome since the first stone of the city was laid." Fronde. Cinna and the tribunes fled, but it was to gather together the soldiers as Sulla had done before them. Marius, too, returned with a thousand cavalry from Numidia, and he had no sooner stepped ashore in Italy than he was joined by five thousand of his veterans, and with his six thousand men he united with Cinna at the gates of Rome. The Senate had made preparations for a vigorous defense, and, in order to prevent the threatened attack, issued proc- lamations, making every concession, and granting every privilege that had been demanded. But all was to no pur- pose. They could not be trusted. Marius and Cinna pressed forward, and after a brief resistance, the city was surrendered, and the two generals entered with their troops. A fearful massacre followed. Fifty senators and a thou- sand knights were slain, besides great numbers of their par- tisans, and for many days the city was given up to a reign of terror. These were the last days of the year 87 B. c. Marius died January 13, 86. Cinna, supported by his troops, became virtually dictator, and ruled Rome for three years. Sulla was everywhere successful against Mithradates, and in the year 84 a peace was concluded, in which Mith- radates was reduced to the position of a vassal of Rome. 10 Id., chap, vii, par. 8. DICTATORSHIP OF SULLA. 39 In 83 Sulla determined to return to Italy, which under Cinna's rule had been almost entirely turned against him. The Italians dreaded to have Sulla return, and Cinna started to go into Greece with his forces to meet Sulla there, but his troops mutinied and killed him, and Sulla was in a short time landed in Italy with 40,000 veteran troops, who had not yet known defeat. Sulla was joined by Pompey with a legion which he had raised. .The defeat of Cinna had dissolved the unity of the parties in Italy, yet it took Sulla about a year to bring all the country into subjection. As soon as he had made his position secure, he entered upon a course of continuous and systematic murder of all who had in any way given support to Cinna or Marius. He had the Senate to appoint him dictator, which made him master of every- thing and everybody in Italy. " He at once outlawed every magistrate, every public servant of any kind, civil or muncipal, who had held office under the rule of Cinna. Lists were drawn for him of the persons of wealth and consequence all over Italy who be- longed to the liberal party. He selected agents whom he could trust, or supposed he could trust, to enter the names for each district. He selected, for instance, Oppianicus of Larino, who inscribed individuals whom he had already murdered, and their relations whose prosecution he feared. It mattered little to Sylla n who were included, if none es- caped who were really dangerous to him ; and an order was issued for the slaughter of the entire number, the confisca- tion of their property, and the division of it between the in- formers and Sylla's friends and soldiers. Private interest was thus called in to assist political animosity ; and to stimulate the zeal for assassination, a reward of 5001 was offered for the head of any person whose name was in the schedule. . . . Four thousand seven hundred persons 11 Froude uses the spelling " Sylla " instead of " Sulla." I have preferred the latter form. It is that used by Merivale, Mommsen, and the " Encyclopedia Britannica." 40 THE LAST DATS OF THE REPUBLIC. fell in the proscription of Sylla, all men of education and fortune. The real crime of many of them was the posses- sion of an estate or a wife which a relative or a neighbor coveted. The crime alleged against all was the opinion that the people of Home and Italy had rights which deserved consideration as well as the senators and nobles. The liberal party were extinguished in their own blood. Their estates were partitioned into a hundred and twenty thousand allotments, which were distributed among Sylla's friends, or soldiers, or freedmen. The laud reform of the Gracchi was mockingly adopted to create a permanent aristocratic garrison. There were no trials, there were no pardons. Common report or private information was at once in- dictment and evidence, and accusation was in itself con- demnation. " Froude. Reform was popular, and Sulla must needs be a reformer ; but his was a reformation which aimed to make the Senate both supreme and absolute. He had already, while consul in 88, crippled the power of both the tribunes and the peo- ple, by passing a law that no proposal should be made to the assembly without the sanction of the Senate ; and now the value of the office of tribune was lowered by the pro- vision that any one who should become a tribune should never afterward be chosen to any other office. In an- other form, also, he lessened the power of the people ; he enacted a law that no man shouM be elected consul who was not forty-three years old, and who had not already been a praetor or a quaestor, and that no one should be made consul a second time within ten years. He also took entirely away from the knights the right of sitting as the court of justice, and restored to the Senate this privilege. As in the matter of the election of tribunes and consuls he had so far deprived the people of the exercise of their power, he now went farther, and enacted a law that the assembly of the people should not even be called together without the Senate's sanction. But the heaviest stroke of *'* Id., chap, viii, par. 10, 13. POMPEY THE GREAT. SULLA, POMPET, AND G^SAR. 41 all that he made against the populace was to abolish en- tirely the grants of grain, and to shut up the public granaries. Thus the power of the Senate was made absolute, and to render it secure, ten thousand slaves were enfranchised and formed into a senatorial guard. But in the existing order of things, it was impossible that such power could be re- spected, or that it could long.be exercised. The only means by which Sulla was enabled to create such a power at all, was the army which was so entirely devoted to himself. From this time .forth, in the very nature of things, it became more and more certain that the army would be the real source of power ; that whosoever should have the sup- port of the strongest body of troops would possess the power ; and that just as soon as that power should be turned against the Senate instead of for it, all this system which had been so carefully built up would be scarcely more tangible than the stuff that dreams are made of. Sulla himself had set the example in 88, it had been readily followed by Cinna in 87, it was repeated here by Sulla in 81, and he himself saw in Pompey a readiness to follow it this same year. Pompey had been sent to Sicily and Africa to reduce things to order there, and he was eminently successful. When he had completed his task, he was ordered by the Senate to disband his troops. He refused, and Sulla had to smooth the matter over by granting him a triumph, and allowing him to assume the title of "the Great," although he was only about twenty-five years of age. By this act of Pompey's, Sulla saw that it would be the best thing to do, to bind Pompey securely to himself. Pompey was already married to Antistia, a lady whose father had been murdered for standing up for Sulla, and whose mother had been driven mad, and to destroy herself, by her husband's terrible fate. But Sulla had a stepdaughter, Emilia, whom he proposed that Pompey should marry. Emilia was already married, and was pregnant at the time, yet at Sulla's invitation 4 42 THE LAST DAYS OF THE REPUBLIC. Pompey divorced Antistia, and married Emilia. There was just then another youth in Rome whom it was to Sulla's interest to gain also, and he proposed to secure his allegiance in much the same way that he had gained Pompey's. That youth was Julius Caesar. Caesar was the nephew of the great Marius, and had married Cornelia, the daughter of Cinna, by whom he had a daughter named Julia. He was at this time about twenty years of age. Sulla proposed to him that he should divorce Cornelia, and marry some woman whom Sulla should choose. Caesar flatly refused. Sulla tried to compel him to it : he deprived him of his office of the priesthood, he took his wife's dowry from him, and confiscated his estate. But Caesar would not yield an inch. Next Sulla hired assassins to kill him, and he escaped only by bribing the assassins. Caesar's friends interceded, and finally obtained his pardon ; but he, not willing to trust himself within Sulla's reach, left Italy, and joined the army in Asia. In 79 Sulla resigned his dictatorship, and died the following year. The power which Sulla had given to the Senate was only used to build up itself. As no election could be had with- out the appointment of the Senate, the elections soon fell under the control of senatorial rings and committees, and no candidate could hope to succeed who had not the favor of the Senate ; and the surest means of securing the favor of the senatorial party was the possession of wealth, and a willingness to spend it to secure an office. The distribution of the land by Sulla had worked no bet- ter than had that by the Gracchi, nor in fact hardly as well ; because since that there had been forty years of degeneracy and political violence, and a part of the time almost anarchy. Extravagance in living had increased at a rapid rate among all classes : among the really wealthy, in an ostentatious display, or the exhaustion of pleasure ; among those of moderate fortunes in an effort to ape the ways of the wealthy ; JULIUS CAESAR. POMPEY AND CRASS US, CONSULS. 43 and even among the poor, owing to the virtually free distri- bution of wheat. For so long as they could get the main part of their living for nothing, they were not likely to culti- vate habits of economy. It was easy enough to distribute land to those who had neither land nor money. The diffi- culty was to keep it so distributed. Those to whom Sulla had distributed land, especially his soldiers, lived far beyond their means ; their lands were soon mortgaged, and at last forfeited, falling once more into the hands of the wealthy land owners, to be worked by slaves, while the free citizens were again crowded into the cities. Besides the vast num- bers of slaves who were put to use on farms and in shops all over Italy, there were many- who were kept and trained to fight one another in the amphitheater, solely for the amuse- ment of the populace. Nothing made a person so popular as to set forth a few pairs of gladiators in the circus to mur- der one another. At Capua, about seventy-five miles south of Rome, was the most famous training-school for gladiators. In the year 73 B. c., two hundred of these gladiators, led by Spartacus, broke away from their "stables" in Capua, and were soon joined by escaped slaves from all the surrounding country, in such numbers that in a little while Spartacus found himself at the head of TO, 000 men ready for any sort of desperate action. For two years they spread terror from one end of Italy to the other, till Pompey and Crassus led forth an army, and annihilated the whole host, B. c. 71. Spartacus was killed, sword in hand, and 6,000 captives were crucified all along the highway from Capua to Rome. Pompey and Crassus were made consuls for the year 70, Sulla's legislation was undone, and everything set back as it was before, except that the prerogative of sitting as a court of law was not restored entirely to the knights. This privi- lege the senators had again prostituted to their old purposes, and as the knights could not be fully trusted either, the court was now to be composed of two-thirds knights and one-third 44 THE LAST DATS OF THE RE PUBLIC. senators. The power of the tribunes was fully restored, also the right of the populace to assemble at their own wish. The public granaries were once more opened. The mob was happy, the Senate was embittered, and the way was again opened for the full tide of political violence which imme- diately followed. Caesar was now fast becoming popular. He and Bibulus had been elected aediles for the year 65, the office of which was to take charge of the public buildings and the games and theaters. "They were expected to decorate the city with new ornaments, and to entertain the people with mag- nificent spectacles." Caesar acquitted himself so well in this as to make himself the favorite of the whole multitude of the people. Then as he felt his influence becoming more firmly established, he set on foot an inquiry into the pro- scription that had been carried on by Sulla. A committee of investigation was appointed, of which Caesar himself was made chairman. At the time when the roof of the Senate house had been torn off, and Saturninus and Glaucia were pelted to death with tiles, in Saturninus, the father of Titus Labienus had been killed. One of those engaged in the massacre at the time was Rabirius, and although he was now a very old man, Labienus prosecuted him before Caesar's committee for the murder of his father. Rabirius was con- victed, but he appealed to the people, who could not see their way clear to convict him of a guilt that was common to the whole aristocracy ; and although he was acquitted, they chose to show to the senatorial party that it was out of no respect to them. The people decided to make Caesar the head of religion by electing him to the office of Pontifex Maxirnus, which became vacant just at this time. This was the greatest honor that could come to a Roman citizen. The office was for life, and until now had always been held by members of the aristocracy, and Sulla had sought to confine it exclusively to these by giving to the sacred college the LAND MONOPOLY AND ANTI-POVERTY REFORM. 45 privilege of electing its own chief. Labienus being tribune, had succeeded in carrying a vote in the assembly by which this privilege was resumed by the people. To fill the va- cancy which now occurred, two of the aristocracy were pre- sented by the senatorial party, and Caesar was nominated by the people. Immense sums of money were spent by the sena- torial party to buy sufficient votes to elect one or the other of their two candidates. Caesar likewise spent money freely, although deeply in debt already. When he left home for the Forum on the morning of the election day, and his mother kissed him good-by, he told her he would either come home Pontifex Maximus or would not come home at all. Such an extreme alternative, however, was not necessary, because he was elected by a vote larger than that of both the other can- didates put together. This was in the year 63, arid soon afterward Caesar was elected praetor for the next year. The land monopoly had again become as notorious as at any time before. The small proprietors had sold out, and large holdings had increased, until the land had fallen into a few hands, and Rome was crowded with a rabble of poor citizens largely fed at public expense. Against the will of the Senate, and by the unanimous voice of the people, Pompey had been sent, B. c. 72, to the East against Mithra- dates, who had again strongly asserted his power. Pompey was victorious everywhere, and his conquests in the East had brought to the State large quantities of land, and his honest conduct in these affairs had filled the treasury with money. Here was a grand opportunity for reform. Rullus, a tribune, brought forward a proposition that part of the ter- ritory acquired by Pompey should be sold, and the money used to buy land in Italy upon which to settle poor citizens from Rome. Cicero, as consul, opposed it strenuously. He railed on Rullus with all the bitterness his abusive tongue could utter. Rullus had stated that the populace of Rome was be- come so powerful as to be dangerous, and that for the good 46 THE LAST DAY 8 OF THE REPUBLIC. of the State it would be proper that some should be removed from the city, and placed upon lands where they could sup- port themselves. This was all true, as Cicero well knew ; yet he hesitated not a moment to curry favor with these, by setting it before them in as objectionable a light as possible in order to defeat the aim of Rullus. Cicero hated the in- fluence of the people as much as anybody else in Rome, but he hated Rullus's proposition more because it would lessen the power of the aristocracy, whose favor he just now longed for more than for anything else ; he therefore pre- tended to be the friend of the people and to be defending them against the ulterior scheme of Rullus. He succeeded. Rullus's bill was defeated, and his plan came to nothing. And had his plan even succeeded it would likewise have come to nothing ; because now the cry had become popular and was becoming more and more imperative ' ' Bread for nothing, and games forever ! " ROME MISTRESS OF THE WORLD. CHAPTER II. THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. HTHE senators held office for life, and therefore the Senate JL was always in possession of power ; while owing to the fact that the elections were annual, the power of the people was but spasmodic at the best. Whenever some extraordi- nary occasion, or some leader who could carry the multitude with him, arose, the people would awake and carry every- thing before them. But when the particular occasion was past, or the leader fallen, the people would drop back into the old easy way, though there was scarcely ever an election without a riot, and the. Senate would gradually regain all its former power ; each time only using it the more despotically, in revenge for the checks which had been put upon it, and the insults which it had received. With politics, as it had universally become, it was inevitable and in fact essential, that there should arise a power constantly active, which should balance that of the Senate, and hold in check its des- potic tendencies. This power, as had already appeared, lay in the army. But the army must be led. Consequently the logic of the situation was that a coalition should be formed representing the different classes of the people, but depend- ing upon the army for support. Such a coalition was demanded by the times and events, and was actually created in B. c. 60. Pompey's work was done in the East, and in December 62 B. c., he returned to Rome to display and enjoy such a [47] 4:8 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. triumph as had never before been seen on earth. A long train of captive princes of the conquered countries as trophies of his victories, and wagons laden with all manner of treas- ure as an offering to the State, followed the triumphant general as he returned to the capital. A triumphal column was erected in his honor, with an inscription which declared "that Pompey, 'the people's general,' had in three years captured fifteen hundred cities, and had slain, taken, or reduced to submission twelve million human beings." The offerings which lie brought filled the treasury to overflowing, and the income from the countries subdued made the annual revenue of the republic double what it had been before. All this was lost upon the Senate, however, except to deepen its jealousy of Pompey. By a special vote, indeed, he "was permitted to wear his triumphal robe in the Senate as often and as long as it might please him ; " but with this the Senate proposed that favors to Pompey should cease. At the border of Italy Pompey had disbanded his troops, and he entered Rome as a private citizen, with only his political influence to sustain him. And just here Pompey failed. Although he was every inch a general, he was no politician. He could victoriously wield an army, but he could do nothing with a crowd. He could command legions, but could not command votes. More than this, during his absence, the senatorial party had employed the time in strenuous efforts and by all means in their power, to destroy his influence in the city, and to create jealousy and distrust between Caesar and Pompey. When Pompey had departed for Asia, it was with the friendship of Caesar, whose in- fluence had helped to secure his appointment. During Pompey's absence, Caesar's influence and popularity had constantly increased in Rome. He held the people's favor, and Pompey held the military power. The senatorial party decided, if possible, to divide this power by estranging Pompey and Caesar from one another. The tale was carried to Pompey that his wife, Mucia, had been seduced by Caesar. THE SENATE OFFENDS CJSSAK. 49 This accomplished its intended purpose, and Pompey di- vorced her. Poinpey's prompt action in disbanding his troops at the border of Italy had relieved the Senate from dread of his military power ; yet Pornpey's troops, although disbanded, and of no force as a military power, were an important element in the elections, so long as Pompey could retain their sympathies. Pompey asked that his acts in Asia might be ratified, but the Senate and its partisans, though not openly refusing to do so, raised so many questions and created so many delays as to amount in effect to a refusal. He also asked that public lands might be distributed to his soldiers, and this also was so successfully opposed as to defeat him. He then attempted to gain his wishes by political influence and action. By the free use of money he secured the election of both the consuls for the year 60 B. c. ; but he was disap- pointed in both. One had not sense enough to be a consul, and the other, Metellus Celer, was the brother of Mucia, whom Pompey had divorced, and under pretense had only lent himself to Pompey in order to take revenge for the reproach thus cast upon his sister. Celer immediately went over to the senatorial party, and engaged in the most violent opposition to Pompey. The tribune Flavius, who had pro- posed Pompey's measures, went so far as to seize Celer, and put him in prison. Celer called the senators to his cell to deliberate there. The tribune set up his tribunal at the prison door, so that the senators might not enter ; but the senators had the prison walls torn down, and went in in spite of the tribune. The Senate, not content with estranging Pompey and Caesar from one another, and openly insulting Pompey be- sides, proceeded to offend Caesar. At the close of Caesar's praetorship, at the end of 62 B. c., the province of Further Spain had been assigned him. But he was in debt two hundred and fifty millions of sesterces about twelve millions of dollars. To pay his debts and make the neces- 50 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. sary preparations for his journey to Spain, lie borrowed from Crassus eight hundred and thirty talents nearly thirteen millions of dollars. The senatorial party, however, endeav- ored to prevent his departure from Home, and a decree was passed to the effect that the praetors should not go to their provinces until certain important questions of State and religion had been finally settled. Caesar knew that this was aimed at him, and therefore in defiance of the decree he went at once to his province, and put himself at the head of the legions there. This was the first real opportunity that Caesar had ever had to prove his ability as a military leader, and he acquitted himself well. "He thus effected the com- plete subjugation of the districts of Lusitania north of the Tagus, including the wild fastnesses of the Herminian Mount- ains and the rapid waters of the Durius. Brigantium in Gali- cia, protected on the land side by the difficult character of the surrounding country, he attacked with a naval armament, and erected his victorious standard at the furthest extremity of his province." Merivale. 1 The complete conquest of his province, and the settle- ment of its civil administration upon a permanent basis, were all accomplished in a little more than a year. His great success entitled him to a triumph, and he desired also to stand for the consulship during the ensuing year. He ad- dressed the Senate soliciting the award of the triumph which he had justly earned. The Senate knew that he wanted also to be a candidate for the consulship. The law was that no general to whom was granted a triumph should come into Rome until the time of triumphal entry, which time was to be fixed by the Senate ; and the custom, which had the force of law, was that every candidate for the consul- ship must appear publicly in the Forum on three distinct occasions, and must be present personally in the Forum on the day of the election. The Senate designed to prevent Caesar's candidacy for the consulship by granting the tri- 1 " History of the Romans Under the Empire," chap, iv, par. 22. POMPEY, CRASSUS, AND CAESAR. 51 umph and setting the time on a day beyond the day of the election, thus keeping him out of the city, so that it would be impossible for him to be present in the Forum as a candidate. This custom could be, and in fact had been, dispensed with on important occasions ; but the Senate was very tenacious of both law and custom when they could be turned to its own advantage. Caesar applied to the Senate for a dispensation allowing him to be a candidate in his absence. The Senate would not grant it, and when Caesar's friends began to urge the matter, Cato defeated them by obtaining the floor and talking all the rest of the day. When Caesar learned of the determination of the Senate to shut him out of the consulship by granting a triumph on a day after the election, he checkmated their nicely-planned move. He renounced the triumph, went at once to Rome, went through the necessary forms, and appeared as a candi- date for the consulship. The Senate had now offended Pompey and embittered his soldiers, and had committed itself to open and deter- mined hostility to Caesar. Pompey took in the situation, saw his opportunity, and acted upon it at once. He made overtures to Caesar, who received him willingly, and an al- liance was formed. Caesar and Crassus were already firm friends, and had been working together for some time. But Crassus and Pompey were bitter enemies. Caesar's tact, however, soon tempered the feud, and reconciled the enmity. Caesar was the idol of the people ; Pompey was the idol of the soldiers ; and Crassus, the richest individual in the Roman world, represented the moneyed class, the farmers of the taxes, etc., who were not of the nobility. These three men covenanted together ' ' that no proceedings should be allowed to take place in the commonwealth with- out the consent of each of the three contracting parties. United they constituted a power beyond all the resources of the commonwealth to cope with." Merivale* Thus 2 Id., par. 33. 52 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. THE FIRST TRIUMVIRATE became an accomplished fact, and though there were a few expiring struggles, the power of the Roman Senate was vir- tually gone forever. Caesar was elected consul by acclamation ; and only by the very desperation of bribery and corruption did the sena- torial party succeed in electing Bibulus as his colleague. It was the custom, immediately upon the election of the consuls, to name the province which should be theirs at the expiration of the year. of their office. The Senate sought to cast a slur upon Caesar by assigning to him the department of roads and forests. But he cared not for that, as he held the power of the State, and had a full year in which to use it before anything in that line was to be performed. Caesar's consulship was for the year 59 B. c. The first act of his administration was to secure the publication of the proceedings of the Senate, that the people might know what was done therein. He next brought forward the land law for the reward of Pompey's veterans, which the Senate had already refused to allow. This measure, however, like that of Tiberius Gracchus, included thousands of the free citizens who had sold their lands and crowded into Rome. In the long interval since the repeal of the land law of Sulla, things had fallen back into the same old way. The public lands had fallen from those to whom the State had distributed them, to the great lauded proprietors. Caesar's land law, like all those before it, proposed to buy the rights of these proprie- tors, as represented in their improvements, and distribute the lands among Pompey's veterans and several thousands of the unemployed population of the city. He showed to the Senate that there was plenty of money in the treasury, which Pompey's soldiers themselves had brought to the State, to supply all the land required under the act. The Senate would not listen. Cato took the lead in the opposi- tion, and talked again for a whole day ; he grew so violent THE CONSULATE OF C^SAR. 53 at last that Caesar ordered the lictors to take him off to prison. Many of the senators followed Cato. As nothing could be done, however, Caesar ordered Cato to be set free, at the same time telling them that as they had refused to take part in legislation, henceforth he would present his propositions at once to the people. Bibulus, however, was owned by the Senate, and he as consul might obstruct and delay the proceeding in the assembly. Besides this, the Senate had bribed three tribunes to assist Bibulus. Caesar did not hesitate. A day was appointed, and he presented his bill in the Forum, which before daylight the populace had filled to overflowing, to prevent the senatorial party from getting in. As Bibulus was consul, a passage was made for him through the crowd, and he took his place with Caesar on the porch of the temple of Castor and Pollux. Caesar stepped forward, and read from a tablet the proposed law, and turning to Bibulus asked if he had any fault to find with it. Bibulus answered that 'there should be no revolu- tions while he was consul, at which the assembly hissed. This made Bibulus yet more angry, and he burst out to the whole assembly, "During my year you shall not obtain your desire, not though you cried for it with one voice. " Pompey and Crassus, though not officials, were both present. Caesar now signaled to them. ; they stepped forward, and he asked whether they would support the law. Pompey made a speech in which he declared that he spoke for his veterans and for the poor citizens, and that he approved the law in every letter of it. Caesar then asked, "Will you then sup- port the law if it be illegally opposed ? " Pompey replied : "Since you, consul, and you, my fellow-citizens, ask aid of me, a poor individual without office and without authority, who nevertheless has done some service to the State, I say that I will bear the shield if others draw the sword." At this, a mighty shout arose from the assembly. Crassus followed with a speech to the same purpose. He likewise was cheered to the echo. Bibulus rushed forward to forbid 54: THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. the vote to be taken. The bribed tribunes interposed their veto. Bibulus declared that he had consulted the auspices, had read the sky, and that they were unfavorable to any further proceeding that day, and declared the assembly dissolved. But the assembly had not come together to be dissolved by him, nor in any such way as that. They paid no attention. He then declared all the rest of the year to be holy time. This was met by a yell that completely drowned his voice. The assembly rushed upon the platform, pushed Bibulus off, broke his insignia of office, bandied him about with the bribed tribunes, and trampled upon them ; but they were able to escape without serious injury. Then Cato took up the strain, pushed his way to the rostra, and began to rail at Caesar. He was met with a roar from the assembly that completely drowned his voice, and in a mo- ment he was arrested and dragged away, raving and gesticu- lating. The law was then passed without a dissenting voice. The next day Bibulus asked the Senate to pass a decree annulling the act of the assembly, but this failed. Cato, Celer, and Favonius openly refused to obey the law, upon which a second law was passed, making it a capital offense to refuse to swear obedience to the law. Bibulus then shut himself up in his own house, and refused to act as consul any more. This left the triumvirate absolute, with the actual power in Caesar's hands for the rest of the year. Pompey's soldiers had been provided for by the land law which had just been passed, and his acts in Asia were con- firmed. In addition to this an act was passed in behalf of Crassus. The farmers of the taxes throughout the prov- inces had taken the contract at too high a price, and now they were not making as much as they expected. Crassus was the chief of all these, and an act was passed granting new terms. By these acts Caesar had more firmly bound to himself both Pompey and Crassus. He then proceeded more fully to gratify the people by a magnificent display of plays and games. ROMAN AUGURS. REFORM BY LAW. 55 In legislation, the Senate was totally ignored ; Csesar acted directly with the assembly of the people, and passed such laws as he pleased. Yet it must be said that he passed none that were not good enough in themselves, but they were laws which in fact meant nothing. There was no pub- lic character to sustain them, and consequently they were made only to be broken. There was a law for the punish- ment of adultery, when not only Caesar, but nine tenths of the people were ready to commit adultery, at the first op- portunity. There were laws for the protection of citizens against violence, when every citizen was ready to commit violence at a moment's notice. There were laws to punish judges who allowed themselves to be bribed, when almost every man in Rome was ready both to offer and to receive bribes. There were laws against defrauding the revenue, when almost every person only desired an opportunity to do that very thing. There were laws against bribery at elec- tions, when every soul in Rome from Caesar to the lowest one of the rabble that shouted in the Forum, was ready to bribe or to be bribed. " Morality and family life were treated as antiquated things among all ranks of society. To be poor was not merely the sorest disgrace and the worst crime, but the only disgrace and the only crime : for money the states- man sold the State, and the burgess sold his freedom ; the post of the officer and the vote of the juryman were to be had for money ; for money the lady of quality surrendered her person, as well as the common courtesan ; falsifying of documents, and perjuries had become so common that in a popular poet of this age an oath is called ' the plaster for debts.' Men had forgotten what honesty was ; a person who refused a bribe was regarded not as an upright man, but as a personal foe. The criminal statistics of all times and countries will hardly furnish a parallel to the dread- ful picture of crimes so varied, so horrible, and so un- natural." Mommsen. 3 In this condition of affairs such laws were nothing more nor less than a legal farce. 3 " History of Rome," book v, chap, xi, par. 72. 56 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. Caesar's consulship was about to expire, and as above stated, when he was elected the Senate had named as his "province" the department of roads and forests instead of a province. As this was intended at the first to be only a slur upon Csesar, and as both he and the people fully understood it, the people set aside this appointment, and voted to Csesar for five years the command of Illyria, and Gaul within the Alps ; but as there were some fears from the barbarians of Gaul beyond the Alps, a proposition was introduced to extend his province to include that. Pompey and Crassus heartily assented, and the Senate seeing that it would be voted to him any way by the assembly, made a virtue of necessity, and bestowed this itself. Pompey now married Caesar's daughter Julia, which more firmly cemented the alliance while Csesar should be absent. The triumvirate had been formed to continue for five years. As the term drew to a close, the triumvirate was renewed for five years more. Pompey and Crassus were made consuls for the year 55 B. c., with the understanding that while in office they should extend Caesar's command in Gaul for five years longer after the expiration of the first five ; and that at the expiration of their consulate, Pompey should have Spain as his province, and Crassus should have Syria. The first thing to be done by the new consuls was to se- cure the assembly's indorsement of the triumvirs' arrange- ment of the provinces. This also the senators opposed by every means to the very last. Cato raved as usual, and when at the expiration of his allotted time he refused to sit down, he was dragged away by an officer, and the meeting adjourned. The next day the assembly came together again. When the senatorial party saw that the action of the trium- virs was to be ratified in spite of them, Cato and Atticus, a tribune, were lifted to men's shoulders, and the tribune cried out, as Bibulus on the like occasion formerly, that the skies were unfavorable, and the proceedings illegal. Other trib- K W EH THE TRIUMVIRATE DISSOLVED. 57 unes ordered the proceedings to go on, at which a riot began. Clubs and stones and swords and knives were freely used. The senatorial party were driven out, the arrange- ment of the provinces fully ratified, and the assembly dis- missed. The people had no sooner gone out than the senatorial party came back, presented a motion for Caesar's recall, and proceeded to vote upon it. The assembly re- turned, and drove them out with more bloodshed, and cer- tainly to prevent all question as to what had been done, passed a second time the motion upon Caesar's appointment. Pompey, yet more to please the populace, dedicated a new theater, which would seat forty thousand people. It was decorated with marble and adorned with precious stones in such abundance as had never before been seen in Rome. The dedication with music, games, chariot races, and contests between men and beasts, continued five days, during which five hundred lions one hundred each day were turned loose in the arena only to be killed. Besides this, eighteen elephants were compelled to fight with bands of gladiators, the piteous cries of the poor creatures finding a response even in the savage sympathies of Romans. By the strifes of parties, the election of consuls for the year 54 was prevented until the expiration of 55, and the consulates of Pompey and Crassus had expired. Crassus departed for the East. Pompey assumed command of the province of Spain, but instead of going to Spain, remained in Rome. In 54, Pompey's wife, Caesar's daughter, died ; in June 53 Crassus was killed in that memorable battle with the Parthians ; and the triumvirate was dissolved. Pompey had now been so long separated from the army that his in- fluence with the soldiery was almost gone, while Caesar's uninterrupted course of victory in Gaul had made him the idol of the army, as well as the pride of the people. The triumvirate was no sooner broken by the death of Crassus, than the Senate began earnestly to try to win Pompey, and 58 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. compass Caesar's destruction. "No aristocracy was ever more short-sighted at the crisis of its fate than the once glo- rious patriciate of Rome. It clung desperately to its privi- leges, not from a fond regard to their antiquity, or their connection with any social or religious prejudices; disdained to invoke the watchwords of patriotism or utility ; it took up its ground upon the enactments which Sulla had made to en- hance its own wealth and power, and depress those of its rivals, and contended with its assailants upon purely selfish considerations. Without a policy and without a leader, the nobles went staggering onward in their blind conflict with the forces arrayed against them.'" - Merivale.* Pompey took -his stand with the Senate. Although he was in Rome, he was really commander of the province of Spain, and was thus in possession of an army, though that army was at a distance. Under pretense of a need of troops in Syria against the Parthians who had defeated and slain Crassus, the Senate drew frojn Caesar two legions, and sta- tioned them at Capua. A motion was then made in the Senate for Caesar's recall, and the appointment of his suc- cessor. But just then an obstacle presented itself which disconcerted all their plans. Scribonius Curio had been one of the most violent partisans of the senatorial party, and largely on account of this he had been elected tribune by the favor of the Senate. But Curio went over to the interests of Caesar. When the motion was made to appoint a suc- cessor to Caesar, Curio moved an amendment to the effect that Pompey be included, and that when Caesar was relieved of his command, Pompey should be relieved of his command also. This amendment met with such approval that it was accepted by an overwhelming majority, and the people were so jubilant that they strewed flowers in Curio's way as he re- turned from the assembly. The adoption of this amendment completely blocked the effort of the Senate to depose Caesar. Curio so persistently interposed his veto to all proceedings against Caesar, that at last an attempt was made to get rid *" Romans Uuder the Empire," chap, xi, par. 4 from end. LEGAL GOVERNMENT AT AN END. 59 of him. One of the censors pronounced him unworthy of a place in the Senate ; the consul Marcellus put the question to vote, and it was defeated. Then the consul and his partisans dressed themselves in mourning, and went straight to Pompey ; declared the city in danger ; placed its safety in his hands ; and gave him the two legions that were at Capua. Pompey refused to accept the charge unless it was sanctioned by the consuls who had been elected for the next year. These both confirmed the appointment, and prom- ised their support when they should come into office. Caesar's enemies had now both an army and a commander. TJds being by the official act of the consular authority, WAS A CONFESSION THAT LEGAL GOVERNMENT WAS AT AN END, AND WAS VIRTUALLY THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GOVERNMENT ONLY BY MILITARY FORCE. Curio's tribunate ended with the year 50, and he closed his term of office with an appeal to the people, in which he declared that justice was violated, that the reign of law was passed, and that a military domination reigned in the city. He then left the city, and went to Caesar, who was encamped at Ravenna with a legion. The consuls for the year 49 were both avowed enemies to Caesar. Two of the tribunes for the year were Mark Antony and Cassius Longinus, friendly to Caesar and ready to veto every proposition that appeared to be to his disadvantage. Caesar sent Curio back to Rome early in January with a letter in which he offered any one of three things : (1) That the agreement long before made should stand, and he be elected consul in his absence ; or (2) that he would leave his army if Pompey would disband his troops ; or (3) that he would surrender to a successor all Gaul beyond the Alps with eight of his ten legions, if he were allowed to retain his original province of Illyria and Northern Italy with two legions. The consuls objected to the reading of the letter, but the demands of the tribunes prevailed. When it had been read through, the consuls pro- 60 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. hibited any debate upon it, and made a motion to consider the state of the republic. None of Caesar's propositions would be considered for a moment. Lentulus, one of the consuls, took the lead in urging prompt and determined action, and others followed to the same purpose. Some advised delay till they were better prepared ; others advised that a deputation be sent to treat further with Caesar. The majority supported Lentulus. It was moved that Caesar should dismiss his troops by a certain day which the Senate should name, and return to Rome as a private citizen, or be declared a public enemy. The two tribunes interposed their vetos on the ground that it had been decreed by the people that Csesar should be allowed to stand for the consul- ship in his absence ; but their plea was totally disregarded, and the motion was passed almost unanimously. The trib- unes then protested against the illegality of the proceedings, and cried aloud that they were refused the free exercise of their official prerogatives. The assembly in reply voted the State in danger ; suspended the laws ; ordered an immediate levy of troops ; and gave the consuls sole power to provide for the public safety. The Senate next proposed to punish the two tribunes. They were given to understand that if they entered the Senate house, they would be expelled by force. They, with Curio, fled to Caesar. The consuls made Pompey commander-in-chief of the forces, and gave him the freedom of the public treasury. Pompey went to Capua to take charge of the two legions there, and organize the new levies. When the news of these proceedings reached Caesar at Ravenna, he assembled his legions, and laid the whole matter before them. The Senate had satisfied itself with the pleasing illusion that Caesar's legions were so dissatisfied with him and discouraged by the long tedious campaigns in barbarous Gaul, that they only waited for a good opportu- nity to desert him in a body. But never had they been more mistaken than they were in this. The soldiers were CAESAR CROSSES THE RUBICON. 61 ready to support him to the utmost. They not only offered to serve without pay, but actually offered him money for the expenses of the war. Only one officer out of the whole army failed him. This one slipped away secretly, and fled to Pompey, and Caesar sent all his baggage after him. Caesar sent orders to Gaul beyond the Alps for two legions to follow him, and he set out toward Rome with the one legion 5, 000 men that was with him. About twenty miles from Ravenna, a little stream called the Rubicon formed part of the boundary between the territory of Rome proper and the provinces which had been assigned to Caesar. To cross this boundary with an armed force was to declare war ; but as the Senate had already by its actions more than once openly declared war, Caesar had no hesitation in cross- ing the boundary. He passed it, and marched ten miles onward to Rimini. There he halted and waited for the two legions ordered from Gaul, one of which reached him about the end of January, and the other about the middle of February. By the time that Caesar had reached Rimini, the rumor had reached Rome that he was coming, and a panic seized his enemies throughout the whole city. Their excited im- aginations and guilty fears pictured him as coming with all his legions, accompanied by hosts of the terrible barbarians of Gaul, hurrying on by forced marches, nearer and yet nearer, and breathing forth fiery wrath. ' ' Flight, instant flight, was the only safety. Up they rose, consuls, praetors, senators, leaving wives and children and property to their fate, not halting even to take the money out of the treasury, but contenting themselves with leaving it locked. On foot, on horseback, in litters, in carriages, they fled for their lives to find safety under Pornpey's wing in Capua." Froude* Instead of Caesar's marching toward Rome, however, he was waiting quietly at Rimini for his legions to come from Gaul, and his waiting there was working doubly to his ad- vantage, to say nothing of the results of the panic-stricken 6 " Caesar," chap, xxi, par. 3. 62 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. fears of his enemies in Rome. Not only did the two legions come promptly from Gaul, but troops flocked to him from all the country around ; and cities on the way to Rome began to declare for him, and were ready to open their gates as soon as he should arrive. Ahenobarbus, with a few thousand men, occupied a strong place in the mountains directly in Caesar's way. Caesar surrounded the place, and captured the whole body of them. lie then let them all go. Ahenobarbus and some of his officers went away, but his troops declared for Caesar. As soon as Pompey and the nobles heard of the capture of Ahenobarbus and the deser- tion of these troops, they took up their flight again for Brundusium on the east coast of Italy, where they might take ships for Epirus. The greater part of them sailed away at once. Pompey remained with a portion of his army for the ships to return to take the in away. Caesar hurried to Brundusium, where he arrived on the ninth of March. Pompey was there. Caesar asked for a meeting, but Pompey refused. Caesar began a siege, but the ships soon came, and Pompey and his army sailed away for Durazzo on the coast of Epirus. Caesar had no ships, and could follow the fugitives no farther. He therefore went directly to Rome. She threw wide her gates to receive him. The remains of the Senate was convened by the tribunes who had fled to Caesar, but it would do nothing. The as- sembly of the people voted him the money in the treasury. He took what he needed, and as Spain and the Mediterranean Coast of Gaul were yet subject to Pompey, he went in a few days to bring these into subjection. This was all accom- plished before winter. He was made dictator in his ab- sence. He returned to Rome in October. He appointed a day for the election of consuls for the year 48, and himself and Servilius Isauricus were chosen without opposition. Thus he was elected consul for the very year that had been promised him long before by the Senate and assembly, al- though the Senate had declared that he never should have JULIUS CAESAR. DICTATOR, DEMI-GOD, AND DEITY. 63 it at all. The election of the other lawful magistrates soon followed, the form of legal government was restored, and he set out at once to find Pompey and the Senate. Pie marched to Brundusium, and sailed to Epirus. There he found that Pompey had gone to Macedonia. After much maneuvering, the armies met at Pharsalia in Thessaly, and Pompey 's army was completely routed. Pompey fled to Egypt. Caesar followed closely ; but Pompey had been murdered and beheaded before he had fairly landed, arid only his head was preserved and rendered an unwelcome present to Caesar. Caesar spent the time till the autumn of 47 setting things in order in Egypt and the East, then he returned to Rome. Finding that Pompey was dead, and that all hope of sup- port from him was gone, Caesar's enemies in Rome became his most servile flatterers. Those who had plunged the State into civil war rather than allow him while absent to be even a candidate for the consulship, now in his absence made him dictator for a whole year, and were ready to heap upon him other preferences without limit. A part of the year 46 was spent in subduing the oppos- ing forces in Africa. This was soon accomplished, and the servile flatterers went on with their fawning adulations. Even before his return, the Senate voted in his favor a national thanksgiving to continue forty days. When he returned, they voted him not one triumph, but four, with intervals of several days between, and that his triumphal car should be drawn by white horses. They made him in- spector of public morals for three years. And as though they would be as extravagant in their adulation as they had been in their condemnation, they voted him dictator for ten years, with the right to nominate the consuls and praetors each year ; that in the Senate his chair should always be between those of the two consuls ; that he should preside in all the games of the circus ; that his image carved in ivory should be borne in processions among the images of 64 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. the gods, and be kept laid up in the capitol over against the place of Jupiter ; that his name should be engraved on a tablet as the restorer of the capital ; and finally that a bronze statue of him standing on a globe should be set up with the inscription, " Csesar, the Demi-god." Csesar was not wanting in efforts to maintain the ap- plause of the populace. He gave to each soldier about a thousand dollars, and to each citizen about twenty dollars, with house-rent free for a year ; and' provided a magnificent feast for the citizens, who were supported by the public grants of grain. Twenty-two thousand tables were spread with the richest viands, upon which the two hundred thou- sand State paupers feasted, while from hogsheads the finest wine flowed freely. Above all this he furnished the finest display of games and bloody battles of gladiators that had ever been seen. So great was it, indeed, and so bloody, and so long continued, that it fairly surfeited the savage Roman appetite ; and the people began to complain that the vast sums of money spent on the shows would have been better employed in donations direct to themselves. Time and space would fail to tell of the numbers, the magnitude, and the magnificence of the buildings with which he adorned the city. In the winter of 465 Csesar was compelled to go to Spain to reduce the last remains of the senatorial forces. This was accomplished before the month of April was passed, yet he did not return to Rome until September. As soon as the news of his victory reached Rome, however, the Sen- ate, which sincerely hoped he would be killed, began once more to pour forth its fulsome flattery. It voted a national thanksgiving to continue fifty days, decreed him another triumph, conferred upon him the power to extend the bounds of the city, and erected another statue of him with the inscription, "To The Invincible Deity." When he returned and had enjoyed his triumph, he again celebrated the occasion with games, combats, and shows no CESAR'S GOVERNMENT. fi5 less splendid than those which he had given before, only not so long continued. After this was all over, he took up the regulation of the affairs of society and state. He gave his soldiers lands, but instead of trying to provide lands in Italy for all of them, he distributed the most of them in colonies in the provinces. He cut down the quantity of public grants of grain, and sent thousands upon thousands of citizens away beyond the seas to establish Roman provinces. Eighty thousand were sent to rebuild Carthage. Another host was sent to rebuild Corinth, which had been destroyed by the Romans a hundred years before. To lessen the evils that had rent the State so long in the annual elections, he enacted that the elections to the lesser offices of the State should be held only once in three years. He enacted that at least one third of the hired help of farmers, vineyardists, stock raisers, etc., should be Roman citizens. He enacted that all physi- cians, philosophers, and men of science should be Roman citizens. This privilege was likewise bestowed upon large numbers of people in Gaul, Spain, and other places. In the early days of Rome, unions of the different trades and handi- crafts had been formed for mutual benefit. In the times which we have sketched, they had become nothing but polit- ical clubs, and withal had become so dangerous that they had to be utterly abolished. In B. c. 58, Clodius, to strengthen his political influence, had restored them. Caesar now abolished them again, but allowed bona Jide trades- unions to be organized upon the original plan of mutual benefit. 8 As inspector of public morals he next attempted, as he had when he was consul in 59, to create reform by law. It was a time of unbounded luxury and of corresponding license and licentiousness. He forbade the rich young nobles to be carried in litters. Sea and land were being traversed for dainties for the tables of the rich; Caesar appointed in- 6 Plutarch's "Lives," Numa, chap. xxxi. Merivale, "Romans Under the Empire," chap, iv, par. 42 ; and chap, xx, par. 11. 6 66 TEE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. specters of the tables and the provision stores to regulate the fare, and any prohibited dish found on any table was picked up and carried away even though the guests were sitting at the table at the moment. The marriage relation had fallen to very loose ways. He enacted that any Roman citizen who was the father of three legitimate children born in Rome, or four in Italy, or five anywhere else, should be ex- empted from certain public obligations ; and that the mothers in such cases should be allowed the special dignity of riding in litters, dressing in purple, and wearing necklaces of pearls. Divorces were as frequent as anybody chose to make them, and Csesar, who had divorced his own wife merely upon suspicion, essayed to regulate divorces ; and he who from his youth had enjoyed the personal favors of the chief women of Rome, he who ' ' had mistresses in every country which he visited, and liaisons with half the ladies in Rome," and who was at the time maintaining an adulterous connection with the Queen of Egypt, he presumed to enact laws against adultery. One thing, however, he did, which was more lasting than all his other acts put together ; and, in fact, of more real benefit. This was the reform of the calendar. All this time the Senate was heaping upon him titles and honors in the same extravagant profusion as before. One decree made him the father of his country ; another liber- ator ; another made him imperator, and commander-in-chief of the army for life with the title to be hereditary in his family. They gave him full charge of the treasury ; they made him consul for ten years, and dictator for life. A triumphal robe and a crown of laurel were bestowed on him, with authority to wear them upon all occasions. A figure of his head was impressed upon the coin. His birthday was declared to be a holiday forever ; and the name of the month, Quinctilius^ was changed to Julius, and is still our July. Next his person was declared sacred, and any disrespect to him in word or action was made to be sacrilege. It was THE MTJRDm OF CAESAR. $7 decreed that the oath of allegiance should be sworn by the Fortune of Caesar. The Senate itself took this oath, and by it swore sacredly to maintain his acts, and watch over the safety of his person. To complete the scale, they declared that he was no more Caius Julius, a man, but Divus Julius, a god ; and that a temple should be built for the worship of him, and Antony should be the first priest. Then, having exhausted the extremest measure of the most contemptible sycophancy, March 15, B. c. 44, THEY MURDERED HIM. Csesar was dead ; but all that had made him what he had been, still lived. Pretended patriots assassinated Caesar to save the republic from what they supposed was threatened in him ; but in that act of base ingratitude and cruel ' ' patriot- ism," there was accomplished that which they professed to fear from him, and which in fact they realized from those who were worse than he. It was with the Romans at this time, as it was with the Athenians when Demosthenes told them that if there were no Philip, they themselves would create a Philip. Affairs had reached that point in the Roman State where a Caesar was inevitable, and though to avoid it they had killed the greatest Roman that ever lived, the reality was only the more hastened by the very means which they had employed to prevent it. This they themselves realized as soon as they had awakened from the dream in which they had done the desperate deed. Cicero exactly defined the situation, and gave a perfect outline of the whole history of the times, when, shortly after the murder of Caesar, he bitterly exclaimed, "We have killed the king; but the kingdom is with us still. We have taken away the tyrant ; the tyranny survives." That tyranny survived in the breast of every man in Rome. At the death of Caesar, to Mark Antony, the sole sur- viving consul, the reins of government fell. Lepidus, Caesar's general of cavalry, was outside the walls with a 68 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. legion of troops about to depart for Spain. He took pos- session of the Camp of Mars, and sent to Antony assur- ances of support. As night came on, with a body of troops he entered the city and camped in the Forum. He and Antony at once came to a mutual understanding. Antony as consul agreed to secure for Lepidus the office of Pontifex Maximus made vacant by the murder of Caesar, and the al- liance was completed by Antony's daughter being given in marriage to the son of Lepidus. Antony secured Caesar's will and all his private papers, besides a great sum of money. As the will showed that Caesar had bequeathed his pri- vate gardens to the people of Rome forever as a pleasure ground, and to each citizen a sum of money amounting to nearly fourteen dollars, this bound the populace more firmly than ever to the memory of Caesar. And as Antony stood forth as the one to avenge Caesar's death, this brought the populace unanimously to his support. By the help of all this power and influence, Antony determined to put himself in the place which Caesar had occupied. Among Caesar's papers he found recorded many of Caesar's plans and inten- tions in matters of the government. These he made to serve his purpose as occasion demanded ; for the Senate dared not dissent from any of Caesar's recorded wishes and designs. When the legitimate papers were exhausted, he bribed one of Caesar's clerks to forge and declare to be Caesar's purpose, such State documents as he chose to have made laws, all of which by the power of Caesar's name were carried against all opposition. Soon, however, there came a serious check upon the suc- cess of Antony's soaring ambition. Octavius appeared upon the scene. Caius Octavius was the grandson of one of Caesar's sisters, and by Caesar's will was left his heir and adopted son. He was then in the nineteenth year of his age. He was in Apollonia when Caesar was killed ; and upon learning of the murder he immediately set out for Rome, not knowing the particulars, nor yet that Caesar had OCTAVIUS PRESENTS HIMSELF. 69 left a will in his favor. These lie learned when he reached the coast of Italy. Without delay, he incorporated Caesar's name with his own, Caius Julius Caesar Octavius, and presented himself to the nearest body of troops as the heir of the great general. When he reached Home, Antony re- ceived him coldly ; refused to give him any of the money that had been left by Caesar ; and caused him all the trouble he possibly could in securing possession of the inheritance. Notwithstanding all this, the young Octavius succeeded at every step, and checked Antony at every move. Antony had lost much of his own influence with the populace by fail- ing to fulfill or even to promise to fulfill to them the provisions of Caesar's will. And by refusing to Octavius any of Caesar's money, he hoped so to cripple him that he could not do it. Octavius promptly assumed all the obligations of the will. He raised money on that portion of the estate which fell to him ; he persuaded the other heirs to surrender to his use their shares in the inheritance ; he borrowed from Caesar's friends ; and altogether succeeded in raising suf- ficient funds to discharge every obligation. By paying to the people the money that Caesar had left them, he bound the populace to himself. At the time of Caesar's funeral, one of the tribunes, a fast friend to Caesar, but who unfort- unately bore the same name as one of Caesar's enemies, was mistaken by the populace for the other man, and in spite of his cries and protestations, was literally torn to pieces. The time came for the vacant tribunate to be filled. Octavius strongly favored a certain candidate. The people proposed to elect Octavius himself, though he was not yet of legal age to hold office. Antony, as consul, interfered to stop the proceedings. This roused the spirit of the peo- ple, and as they could not elect Octavius, they stubbornly refused to elect anybody. Antony, seeing his power with the people was gone, next tried to secure the support of the army. The six best legions of the republic were stationed in Macedonia, destined 70 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. for service in Parthia. Five of these legions Antony whee- dled the Senate into transferring to him. Next he intrigued to have the province of Gaul within the Alps bestowed on him instead of the province of Macedonia which had al- ready been given him. This the Senate hesitated to do, and interposed so many objections that Antony found his purpose about to be frustrated, and he made overtures to Octavius. Octavius received him favorably ; a pretended reconciliation was accomplished between them ; and by the support of Octavius, Antony secured the change of prov- inces which he desired. Antony called four of his legions from Macedonia to Brundusium, and went to that place to assume command. As soon as Antony went to Brundusium, Octavius went to Campania, to the colonies of veterans who had been settled there upon the public lands, and by the offer of about a hundred dollars to each one who would join him, he soon secured a force of ten thousand men. These he took to the north of Italy, to the border of Antony's province, and put them in camp there. When Antony met his legions at Brundusium, he found them sullen, and instead of their greeting him with acclama- tions they demanded explanations. They declared that they wanted vengeance for Caesar's death, and that instead of punishing the assassins, Antony had dallied with them. They called upon him to mount the tribunal, and explain his conduct. He replied that it was not the place of a Roman commander to explain his conduct, but to enforce obedience. Yet he betrayed his fear of them by mingling promises with his threats and pledges with his commands. He offered them about twenty dollars apiece, and drew a contrast be- tween the hard service in Parthia, and the easy time that was before them in the province to which he was to take them. This did not satisfy them. He put some to death, yet the others would not be quiet. The agents of Octa- vius were among them contrasting the hundred dollars to each man^ that he was paying, with the paltry twenty dol- PLOT, COUNTERPLOT, AND WAR. 71 lars that Antony was Coffering. Antony was obliged to increase his bid, but it was not yet near the price Octavius was offering. He broke up the command into small bodies, and ordered them to march separately thus along the coast of the Adriatic, and unite again at Rimini, and he himself returned to Rome. He had barely time to reach his home, when a messenger arrived with the word that one of his legions had gone over bodily to Octavius. This message had scarcely been delivered when another came saying that another legion had done likewise. He went with all haste to where they were, hoping to win them back, but they shut against him the gates of the city where they were, and shot at him from the walls. By raising his bid to the same amount that Octavius was paying, he succeeded in holding the other two legions in allegiance to himself. War could be the only result of such counterplotting as this, and other circumstances hastened it. Antony now had four legions ; Lepidus had six ; three were in Gaul under the command of Plancus ; and Octavius had five. When Antony had obtained the exchange of provinces, the one which he secured Gaul within the Alps was already under the command of a pro-consul, Decimus Brutus. But with the command of the province Antony had received authority to drive out of it any pretender to the government. He commanded Decimus to leave the province. Decimus refused, and Antony declared war. Decimus shut himself up in a stronghold, and Antony laid siege to him there. Octavius saw now* an opportunity to humble Antony, and strengthen himself he offered his service to the Senate. The two consuls whose term of office had expired came up, January 43, B. c., and Octavius joined his forces to theirs. Two battles were fought in April, in both of which Antony was worsted, though both the pro-consuls were slain. Antony left the field of battle, and marched across the Alps and joined Lepidus. Decimus desired to follow with all the forces present ; but as he was one of the inur- 72 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. derers of Caesar, Octavius would not obey him. Also the troops of Octavius declared that Caesar's heir was their leader, and Decimus their enemy. Decimus then marched also across the Alps, and joined his forces to those of Plan- cus. This left Italy wholly to Octavius, and he made the most of the opportunity. He demanded that the Senate grant him a triumph. His demand was only treated with contempt. The Senate in turn sent to him a peremptory command to lead his army against "the parricides and brigands " that had joined their forces in Gaul. He replied by sending to Rome four hundred of his soldiers to demand for him the consulship for the year 42. The soldiers presented their demand in the Senate house. It was refused. One of them then laid his hand upon his sword and declared with an oath, "If you do not grant it, this shall obtain it for him." Cicero replied, " If this is the way that you sue for the consulship, doubtless your chief will acquire it." The soldiers returned to Octavius, and reported upon their embassy. Octavius with his legions immediately crossed the Rubicon and started for Rome, giving up to the license of his soldiers all the country as he passed. As soon as the Senate learned that Octavius was coming with his army, they sent an embassy to meet him, and to tell him that if he would only turn back they would grant everything he asked, and add yet above all about five hun- dred dollars for each of his soldiers. But he, knowing that he had the Senate in his power, determined to make his own terms after he should get possession of the city. The Senate turned brave again, put on a blustering air, and for- bade the legions to come nearer than ninety miles to the city. As two legions had just come from Africa, the Senate supposed they had a military power of their own. They threw up fortifications and gave the praetors military com- mand of the city. By this time Octavius and his army had reached Rome. The senators again suddenly lost all their OCTAVIUS BECOMES CONSUL. 73 bravery. Such of them as had least hope of favor fled from the city or hid themselves. Of the others, each one for himself decided to go over to Octavius ; and when each one with great secrecy had made his way to the camp of the legions, he soon found that all the others had done the same thing. The legions and the praetors who had been set to defend the city went over bodily to Octavius. The gates were thrown open ; Octavius with his legions entered the city ; the Senate nominated him for consul ; the assembly was convened, and he was elected September 22, 43 B. c. with his own cousin, Pedius, chosen as his colleague, and with the right to name the prefect of the city. Octavius became twenty years old the next day. An inquiry was at once instituted upon the murder of Caesar, and all the conspirators were declared outlaws ; but as Brutus and Cassius, the two chief assassins, were in command of the twenty legions in Macedonia and Asia Minor, Octavius needed more power. This he obtained by forming an alliance with Antony and Lepidus. These two commanders crossed the Alps, and the three met on a small island in the River Reno, near Bologna. There, as a result of their deliberation for three days, THE SECOND TRIUMVIRATE was formed, and the tripartition of the Roman world was made. They assumed the right to dispose of all the offices of the government ; and all their decrees were to have the force of law, without any question, confirmation, or revision by either the Senate or the people. In short, they proposed that their power should be absolute they would do what they pleased. Yet they were compelled to consider the army. To secure the support of the legions, they pledged to them eighteen of the finest districts in Italy, with an addition of about a thousand dollars to each soldier. The conditions of the compact were put into writing, and when 74 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. each of the triumvirs had taken an oath faithfully to observe them, they were read to the troops. The soldiers signified their approval upon condition that Octavius should marry the daughter of Antony's wife Fulvia. 7 When the powers of the triumvirate had thus been made firm, the triumvirs sat down "with a list of the noblest citi- zens before them, and each in turn pricked [with a pin] the name of him whom he destined to perish. Each claimed to be ridded of his personal enemies, and to save his own friends. But when they found their wishes to clash, they re- sorted without compunction to mutual concessions." Above all other men Cicero was the one upon whom Antony desired to execute vengeance ; and in return for this boon, he sur- rendered to Octavius his own uncle on his mother's side. Lepidus gave up his own brother. "As they proceeded, their views expanded. They signed death warrants to gratify their friends. As the list slowly lengthened, new motives were discovered for appending to it additional names. The mere possession of riches was fatal to many ; for the masters of so many legions were always poor : the occupation of pleasant houses and estates sealed the fate of others ; for the triumvirs were voluptuous as well as cruel. Lastly, the mutual jealousy of the proscribers augmented the number of their victims, each seeking the destruction of those who conspicuously favored his colleagues, and each exacting a similar compensation in return. The whole number ex- tended, we are told, to three hundred senators and two thousand knights ; among them were brothers, uncles, and favorite officers of the triumvirs themselves." Merivale* When this list had been arranged, the triumvirs with their legions started to Rome. Before they reached the city, they sent to the consuls the names of seventeen of the most prominent citizens, with an order to put them all to death at 7 The girl's name was Clodia. She was Fulvia's daughter by Clodius, her former husband. 8 "Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxvi, par. 13. TEE TRIUMVIR8 ENTER ROME. 75 once. Cicero was one of the seventeen. The executioners "attacked the houses of the appointed victims in the middle of the night : some they seized and slew unresisting ; others struggled to the last, and shed blood in their own defense ; others escaping from their hands raised the alarm through- out the city, and the general terror of all classes, not know- ing what to expect, or who might feel himself safe, caused a violent commotion." Merivale. 9 Cicero had left the city, but he was overtaken by the messengers of blood, his head and his hands were cut off and carried to Antony, who exulted over the ghastly trophies ; and Fulvia in a rage of gloating anger took the bloody head and held it upon her knees, and looking into the face poured forth a torrent of bitter invective against him whose face it was, and then in a perfect abandon of fury seized from her hair her golden bodkin, and pierced through and through the tongue that had so often, so exultantly, and so vilely abused both her husbands. The triumvirs reached Rome one after another. " Octa- vius entered first ; on the following day Antony appeared ; Lepidus came third. Each man was surrounded by a legion and his praetorian cohort. The inhabitants beheld with terror these silent soldiers taking possession of every point commanding the city. Rome seemed like a place conquered and given over to the sword." Duruy. A tribune called an assembly of the people ; a few came, and the three com- manders ' ' were now formally invested with the title of tri- umvirs, and all the powers they claimed were conferred upon them " November 27, B. c. 43. The following night there was posted throughout the city this edict : " M. Lepidus, Marcus Antonius, and Octavius Caesar, chosen trium- virs for the reconstitution of the republic, thus declare : Had not the perfidy of the wicked answered benefits by hatred ; had not those whom Caesar in his clemency spared after their defeat, enriched and loaded with honors, become his murderers, we too should disregard 9 Id., par. 14. 10 " History of Rome," chap, lix, sec. iv, par. 10. Y6 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. those who have declared us public enemies. But perceiving that their malignity can be conquered by no benefits, we have chosen to forestall our enemies rather than be taken unawares by them. Some have already been punished ; with the help of the gods we shall bring the rest to justice. Being ready to undertake an expedition against the parricides beyond the seas, it has seemed to us and will appear to you necessary that we should not leave other enemies behind us. Yet we will be more merciful than a former imperator, who also restored the ruined republic, and whom you hailed with the name of Felix. Not all the wealthy, not all who have held office, will perish, but only the most dangerous evil-doers. These offenders we might have seized unawares ; but for your sakes we have preferred to draw up a list of proscribed persons rather than to order an execution by the troops, in which harm might have come to the innocent. This then is our order : Let no one hide any of those whose names follow ; whosoever shall aid in the escape of a proscribed man shall be himself proscribed. Let the heads be brought to us. As a reward, a man of free condition shall receive twenty-five thousand Attic drachmae, a slave ten thousand, to- gether with freedom and the name of citizen. The names of persons receiving these rewards shall be kept secret." Duruy. 11 Attached to this document were one hundred and thirty names of senators and knights who were devoted to death. Another list of one hundred and fifty was almost imme- diately added, and yet others followed in quick succession. Guards had been placed at all the gates, all places of ref- uge had been occupied, and all means of escape had been cutoff. The slaughter began. "The executioners, armed with the prostituted forms of authority, rushed unresisted and unhindered in pursuit of their victims. They found many to aid them in the search, and to stimulate their ac- tivity. The contagious thirst of blood spread from the hired assassins to all who had an ancient grudge to requite, a future favor to obtain. Many fell in the confusion whose names were not included in the list of the proscribed. Many a private debt was wiped out in the blood of the creditor. Robbers and cut-throats mingled with the bitter partisan and the private enemy. While the murderer carried the head of his victim to fix it on a spike before the rostra, and claim 11 Id, Two REPUBLICS. "THE SAVIORS OF THEIR COUNTRY." 77 the proffered reward, thfc jackals of massacre entered the tenantless house, and glutted themselves with plunder." Merivale. When the names of the published lists had been exhausted, and all their political enemies had been slain, the triumvirs published yet another list, not of more to be put to death, but of those whose property should be confiscated. When this list was exhausted, then "all the inhabitants of Rome and Italy, citizens and foreigners, priests and freedmen," who had possessions amounting to more than twenty thousand dollars, were obliged to "lend" to the triumvirs one-tenth of all their possessions, and "give" one year's income besides. Then, "glutted with blood and rapine," Lepidus, for the triumvirate, announced to the Senate that the proscription was at an end. Octavius, however, reserved the right to kill some more, and "declared that the only limit he had fixed to the proscription was that he should be free to act as he pleased." Suetonius. Then the fawn- ing Senate voted to the triumvirs civic crowns as ' ' the sav- iors of their country." In the beginning of the year 42 B. c., Antony and Oc- tavius, leaving Lepidus in command of Rome and Italy, started to the East to destroy Brutus and Cassius, the murderers of Caesar ; but it was summer before they got all their troops together in Macedonia. Brutus and Cassius, with their united forces, had returned from Asia Minor into Europe. The two armies met at Philippi in Mace- donia. The forces of Brutus and Cassius numbered about one hundred thousand, and those of Antony and Octavius about one hundred and twenty thousand. Two battles, twenty days apart, were fought on the same ground. In the first Cassius lost his life ; in the second the army of Brutus was annihilated, and Brutus himself committed suicide. 12 " Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxvi, par. 15. 13 " Lives of the Caesars," Augustus, chap, xxvli. 78 THE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. It became necessary now to pay the soldiers the money and put them in possession of the land which had been promised them when the triumvirate was formed. A sum equal to a thousand dollars had been promised to each soldier, and, as there were now one hundred and seventy thousand soldiers, a sum equal to one hundred and sev- enty million dollars was required. Antony assumed the task of raising the money from the wealth of Asia, and Octavius the task of dispossessing the inhabitants of Italy and distributing their lands and cities among the soldiers. Antony's word to the people of Pergamos describes the situation both in Italy and all the countries of Asia. To them he said : "You deserve death for rebellion; this penalty I will remit; but I want money, for I have twenty-eight legions, which" with their auxiliary battalions amount to 170,000 men, besides cavalry and detachments in other quarters. I leave you to conceive what a mass of money must be required to maintain such armaments. My colleague has gone to Italy to divide its soil among these soldiers, and to expel, so to speak, the Italians from their own country. Your lands we do not demand ; but instead thereof we will have money. And when you hear how easily, after all, we shall be contented, you will, we conceive, be satisfied to pay and be quit of us. We demand only the same sum which you have con- tributed during the last two years to our adversaries ; that is to say, the tribute of ten years ; but our necessities compel us to insist upon receiv- ing this sum within twelve months." Merivale. 14 As the tribute was much reduced by the time it reached the coffers of Antony, the levy was doubled, and the com- mand given that it should be paid in two installments the same year. To this the people replied, "If you force us to pay the tribute twice in one year, give us two summers and two harvests. No doubt you have also the power to do so." But instead of considering the distress of the people caused by these most burdensome exactions, " Antony surrounded himself with flute-players, mountebanks, and dancing-girls. He entered Ephesus, preceded by women dressed as Bac- u " Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxvii, par. 2. ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA. 79 chantes, and youths in the garb of Fauns and Satyrs. Al- ready he assumed the attributes of Bacchus, and set himself to play the part by continual orgies." Duruy. 15 While Cassius was in Asia Minor, he had compelled Cleopatra, queen of Egypt, to supply him with troops and money. As these had been used against the triumvirs, Antony sent from Tarsus in Cilicia, and called her to ac- count for her conduct. She came, representing Yenus, to render her account in person. And ' ' when she first met Mark Antony, she pursed up his heart on the river of Cydnus." "The barge she sat in, like a burnished throne, Burned on the water : the poop was beaten gold ; Purple the sails, and so perfumed that The winds were love-sick with them ; the oars were silver, Which to the tune of flutes kept stroke, and made The water, which they beat, to follow faster, As amorous of their strokes. For her own person, It beggared all description : she did lie In her pavilion (cloth of gold and tissue), O'er-picturing that Venus, where we see The fancy out-work nature : on each side her, Stood pretty dimpled boys, like smiling cupids, With divers colored fans, whose wind did seem To glow the delicate cheeks which they did cool, And what they undid, did. . . . "Her gentlewomen, like the Nereides, So many mermaids, tended her i' the eyes, And made their bends adornings : at the helm A seeming mermaid steers ; the silken tackle Swell with the touches of those flower-soft hands, That yarely frame the office. From the barge A strange invisible perfume hits the sense Of the adjacent wharfs. The city cast Her people out upon her ; and Antony, Enthroned in the market-place, did sit alone, Whistling to the air ; which, but for vacancy, Had gone to gaze on Cleopatra, too, And made a gap in nature. . . . 16 " History of Rome," chap. Ix, sec. iii, par. 1. 80 TEE TWO TRIUMVIRATES. " Upon her landing, Antony sent to her, Invited her to supper : she replied, It should be better, he became her guest ; Which she entreated : Our courteous Antony, Whom ne'er the word of ' No,* woman heard speak, Being barbered ten times o'er, goes to the feast ; - And, for his ordinary, pays his heart, For what his eyes eat only." Shakespeare. Antony went with Cleopatra to Alexandria, B. c. 41. Fulvia died in the spring of 40. Antony's giddy infatuation with the voluptuous queen of Egypt was fast estranging him from Octavius and the Roman people. The matter was patched up for a little while, by the marriage of Antony and Octavia, the sister of Octavius, B. c. 40 ; but within two years Antony was again swallowed up in the charms of Cleopatra, from whom he never again separated. Two children whom he had by her he named respectively the Sun and the Moon, and when Cleopatra assumed the dress and professed the attributes of Isis, Antony played the part of Osiris. He publicly rejected Octavia in 35, divorced her in 32, and war was declared the same year. The war began and ended with the naval battle of Actium, September 2, B. c. 31. In the midst of the battle Cleopatra hoisted sail and fled. Antony left everything and followed her. They sailed home to Alexandria, and there committed suicide. In the mean- time Lepidus had been set aside, and now, just thirteen and one-half years from the murder of Caesar, the State, having again gone through the same course precisely, came again to the exact point where it had been then, only in worse hands, and Octa/vim was the head of one hundred and twenty millions of people, and SOLE MASTEE or THE ROMAN WORLD . 16 " Antony and Cleopatra," act ii, scene II. w > H3 H F H O "^ > Q CHAPTER III. THE ROMAN MONARCHY. "mask of hypocrisy" which Octavius had assumed 1 at the age of nineteen, and " which he never afterwards laid aside," was now at the age of thirty-four made to tell to the utmost in firmly establishing himself in the place of supreme power which he had attained. Having before him the important lesson of the fate of Caesar in the same posi- tion, when the Senate bestowed upon him the flatteries, the titles, and the dignities which it had before bestowed upon Caesar, he pretended to throw them all back upon the Senate and people, and obliged the Senate to go through the form of absolutely forcing them upon him. For he "was sen- sible that mankind is governed by names ; nor was he de- ceived in his expectation that the Senate and people would submit to slavery provided they were respectfully assured that they still enjoyed their ancient freedom." He there- fore ' ' wished to deceive the people by an image of civil lib- erty, and the armies by an image of civil government. " Gibbon. 1 In this way he finally merged in himself the prerogatives of all the regular officers of the State tribune, consul, prince of the Senate, pro-consul, imperator, censor, Pontifex Maximus with all the titles and dignities which had been given by the Senate to him, as before to Caesar. In short, he himself became virtually the State ; his will was absolute. Having thus drawn to himself "the functions of the Senate and the magistrate, and the framing of the laws, in which lu Decline and Fall," chap. Hi, par. 17, 18. [81] 82 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. he was thwarted by no man," the title of "Father of his Country " meant much more than ever it had before. The State was "the common parent" of the people. The State being now merged in one man, when that man became the father of his country, he likewise became the father of the people. And "the system by which every citizen shared in the government being thrown aside, all men regarded the orders of the prince as the only rule of conduct and obedi- ence."- Tacitus.* Nor was this so merely in civic things : it was equally so in religious affairs. In fact there was in the Roman system no such distinction known as civil and religious. The State was divine, therefore that which was civil was in itself religious. One man now having become the State, it became necessary that some title should be found which would fit this new dignity and express this new power. The Senate had exhausted the vocabulary of flattering titles in those which it had given to Caesar. Although all these were now given to Octavius, there was none amongst them which could properly define the new dignity which he possessed. Much anxious thought was given to this great question. "At last he fixed upon the epithet 'Augustus,' a name which no man had borne before, and which, on the contrary, had been applied to things the most noble, the most venerable, and the most sacred. The rites of the gods were called august ; their temples were august. The word itself was derived from the holy auguries / it was connected in meaning with the abstract term ' ' authority, " and with all that increases and flourishes upon earth. The use of this glorious title could not fail to smooth the way to the general acceptance of the divine character of the mortal who was deemed worthy to bear it. The Senate had just decreed the divinity of the defunct Caesar ; the courtiers were beginning now to insinuate that his successor, while yet alive, enjoyed an effluence from deity ; the poets were even suggesting 2 " Annals," book i, chap. 4. AUGUSTUS. THE FATHER OF THE PEOPLE. 83 that altars should be raised to him ; and in the provinces, among the subjects of the State at least, temples to his divinity were actually rising, and the cult of Augustus was beginning to assume a name, a ritual, and a priesthood. ' ' Encyclopedia Britannica. " 3 He tyrannized over the nobles by his power, and held the affections of the populace by his munificence. "In the number, variety, and magnificence of his public spectacles, he surpassed all former example. Four and twenty times, he says, he treated the people with games upon his own account, and three and twenty times for such magistrates as were either absent, or not able to afford the expense. . . . fle entertained the people with wrestlers in the Campus Martius, where wooden seats were erected for the purpose ; and also with a naval fight, for which he excavated the ground near the Tiber." In order that the people might all go to these special shows, he stationed guards through the streets to keep the houses from being robbed while the dwellers were absent. ' ' He displayed his munificence to all ranks of the people on various occasions. Moreover, upon his bringing the treasure belonging to the kings of Egypt into the city, in his Alexandrian triumph, he made money so plentiful that interest fell, and the price of land rose considerably. And afterwards, as often as large sums of money came into his possession by means of confiscations, he would lend it free of interest, for a fixed term, to such as could give security for the double of what was borrowed. The estate necessary to qualify a senator, instead of eight hundred thousand sesterces, the former standard, he ordered, for the future, to be twelve hundred thousand ; and to those who had not so much, he made good the deficiency. He often made donations to the people, but generally of differ- ent sums ; sometimes four hundred, sometimes three hundred, or two hundred and fifty sesterces : upon which occasions, he extended his bounty even to young boys, who before were 3 Article "Augustus." 84 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. not used to receive anything, until they arrived at eleven years of age. In a scarcity of corn, he would frequently let them have it at a very low price, or none at all, and doubled the number of the money tickets." Suetonius.* It occurred to him that he ought to abolish the distribu- tion of grain at public expense, as he declared that it was "working unmitigated evil, retarding the advance of agri- culture, and cutting the sinews of industry." But he was afraid to do it, lest some one would take advantage of the opportunity and ascend to power by restoring it. His own words are these : "I was much inclined to abolish forever the practice of allowing the people corn at the public expense, because they trust so much to it, that they are too lazy to till their lands ; but I did not persevere in my design, as I felt sure that the practice would sometime or other be revived by some one ambitious of popular favor." Suetonius. 5 In public and political life a confirmed and constant hypocrite, in private and domestic life he was no less. He was so absolutely calculating that he actually wrote out be- forehand what he wished to say to his friends, and even to his wife. He married Clodia merely for political advantage, although at that time she was scarcely of marriageable age. He soon put her away, and married Scribonia. Her, too, he soon put away, "for resenting too freely the excessive influence which one of his mistresses had gained over him " (Suetonius 6 }, and immediately took Livia Drusilla from her wedded husband. Her he kept all the rest of his days ; for, instead of resenting any of his lascivious excesses, she con- nived at them. By Scribonia he had a daughter Julia. Her he gave first to his sister's son, who soon died ; and then he gave her to her brother-in-law, Marcus Agrippa, who was already married to her cousin by whom he had children. Never- 4 "Lives of the Caesars," chap. xli. 5 Id., chap. xlii. Merivale, "Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxii, par. 4. 6 Id., chap. Ixix. Two REPUBLICS. TIBERIUS. THE ACCESSION OF TIBERIUS. 85 theless Agrippa was obliged to put away his wife and children, and take Julia. Agrippa likewise soon died ; then Tiberius was obliged to put away his wife, by whom he already had a son and who was soon to become a mother again, in order that he might be the step-son of the emperor by becoming Julia's third husband. By this time, however, Julia had copied so much of her father's wickedness that Tiberius could not live with her ; and her daughter had copied so much of hers, that ' ' the two Julias, his daughter and grand- daughter, abandoned themselves to such courses of lewdness and debauchery, that he banished them both " (Suetonius T ), and even had thoughts of putting to death the elder Julia. Yet Augustus, setting such an example of wickedness as this, presumed to enact laws punishing in others the same things which were habitually practiced by himself. But all these evil practices were so generally followed, that laws would have done no good by whomsoever enacted, much less would they avail when issued by such a person as he. Augustus died at the age of seventy-six, August 19, A. D. 14, and was succeeded by TIBERIUS. Forty-three years of the sole authority of Augustus had established the principle of absolutism in government, but "the critical moment for a government is that of its founder's death." It was now to be discovered whether that principle was firmly fixed ; but Tiberius was fifty-six years old, and had been a careful student of Augustus, and though at his accession the new principle of government was put to its se- verest test, Tiberius made Augustus his model in all things ; "continued his hypocritical moderation, and made it, so to speak, the rule of the imperial government." -Dwruy. 8 Though he immediately assumed the imperial authority, like his model, "He affected by a most impudent piece of 7 " Lives of tbe Caesars," Augustus, chap. Ixv. ""History of Rome," chap. Ixxif, sec. i, par. 9. 86 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. acting to refuse it for a long time ; one while sharply repre- hending his friends who entreated him to accept it, as little knowing what a monster the government was ; another while keeping in suspense the Senate when they implored him and threw themselves at his feet, by ambiguous answers and a crafty kind of dissimulation ; in so much that some were out of patience and one cried out during the confusion, ' Either let him accept it or decline it at once ; ' and a second told him to his face : ' Others are slow to perform what they promise, but you are slow to promise what you actually per- form.' At last as if forced to it, and complaining of the miserable and burdensome service imposed upon him, he accepted the government." /SWefomW. 9 The purpose of all this was, as with Augustus, to cause the Senate by fairly forcing imperial honors upon him, firmly to ally itself to the imperial authority by making itself the guardian of that power ; so that when any danger should threaten the emperor, the Senate would thus stand pledged to defend him. And dangers were at this time so thick about Tiberius that he declared he had " a wolf by the ears." The principle thing that had marked his accession was the murder of Agrippa Posthumus, the son of Agrippa the minister of Augustus ; and now a slave of Agrippa's had got together a considerable force to avenge his master's death. "Lucius Scribonius Libo, a senator of the first dis- tinction, was secretly fomenting a rebellion, and the troops both in Illyricum and Germany were mutinous. Both ar- mies insisted upon high demands, particularly that their pay should be made equal to that of the praetorian guards. The army in Germany absolutely refused to acknowledge a prince who was not their own choice, and urged with all possible importunity Germanicus, who commanded them, to take the government on himself, though he obstinately re- fused it." Suetonius. 9 "Lives of the Caesars," Tiberius, chap. xxlv. 10 Id., chap. xxv. THE ENEMY OF PUBLIC LIBERTY. 87 All these dangers were soon passed, and Tiberius pre- tending to be the servant of the Senate, "assumed the sov- ereignty by slow degrees," and the Senate allowed nothing to check its extravagance in bestowing titles, honors, and powers, for "such was the pestilential character of those times, so contaminated with adulation, that not only the first nobles, whose obnoxious splendor found protection only in obsequiousness, but all who had been, consuls, a great part of such as had been praetors, and even many of the inferior senators, strove for priority in the fulsome- ness and extravagance of their votes. There is a tradition that Tiberius, as often as he went out of the Senate, was wont to cry out in Greek, ' How fitted for slavery are these men ! ' Yes, even Tiberius, the enemy of public liberty, nauseated .the crouching tameness of his slaves." Tacitus. n This course of conduct he continued through nine years, and his reign was perhaps as mild during this time as that of any other Roman would have been ; but when at last he felt himself secure in the position where he was placed above all law, there was no enormity that he did not commit. One man being n<*v the State, and that one man being "divine," high treason violated majesty became the most common crime, and the "universal resource in accu- sations." In former times, "If any one impaired the maj- esty of the Roman people by betraying an army, by exciting sedition among the Commons, in short, by any maladminis- tration of the public affairs, the actions were matter of trial, but words were free. " Tacitus. 12 But now the law embraced "not words only, but a gesture, an involuntary forgetfulness, an indiscreet curiosity." Duruy. 13 More than this, as the emperor was the embodiment of the divinity of the Roman State, this divinity was likewise supposed to be reflected in the statues and images of him. Any disrespect, any slight, 11 "Annals," book iii, chap. Ixv. 12 /d., book 1, chap. Ixxii. 13 " History of Koine " chap. Ixxiii, par. 2. 88 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. any indifference, any carelessness intentional or otherwise, shown toward any such statue, or image, or picture, was considered as referring to him ; was violative of his majesty ; and was high treason. If any one counted as sold, a statue of the emperor with the field in which it stood, even though he had made and set up the statue himself ; any one who should throw a stone at it ; any one who should take away its head ; any one who should melt the bronze or use for any profane purpose the stone, even of a broken or mutilated image or statue, all were alike guilty of high treason. Yet more than this, in all cases of high treason when the accused was found guilty, one fourth of his estate was by law made sure to the informer. "Thus the informers, a description of men called into existence to prey upon the vitals of society and never sufficiently restrained even by penalties, were now encouraged by rewards." Tacitus. Bearing these facts in mind, it is easy to understand the force of that political turn which the priests and Pharisees of Jerusalem took upon Pilate in their charges against Christ : "If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend : who- soever maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar." John xix, 12. On account of the furious^jealousy of Tiberius and his readiness to welcome the reports of informers, the priests and Pharisees knew full well, and so did Pilate, that if a deputation should be sent to Rome accusing him of high treason in sanctioning the kingship of a Jew, Pilate would be called to Rome and crucified. Thus in Tiberius the government of Rome became " a furious and crushing despotism." The emperor being above all law, forgot all restraint, and "abandoned himself to every species of cruelty, never wanting occasions of one kind or another, to serve as a pretext. He first fell upon the friends and acquaintances of his mother, then those of his grandsons and his daughter-in-law, and lastly those of Se- janus, after whose death he became cruel in the extreme." 14 "Annals," book iv, chap. xxx. A FURIOUS AND CRUSHING DESPOTISM. 89 Sejanus was his chief minister of State and his special friend and favorite a worthy favorite, too. Tiberius, at his par- ticular solicitation, retired to the island of Capri, where he attempted to imitate the lascivious ways of all the gods and goddesses at once. Sejanus, left in command of the empire, aspired to pos- sess it in full. He had already put away his own wife, and poisoned the son of Tiberius that he might marry his widow. His scheme was discovered ; he was strangled by the public executioner, and torn to pieces by the populace. Then, under the accusation of being friends of Sejanus, a great number of people were first imprisoned, and shortly after- ward, without even the form of a trial, Tiberius ' ' ordered all who were in prison under accusation of attachment to Sejanus, to be put to death. There lay the countless mass of slain of every sex and age the illustrious and the mean ; some dispersed, others collected in heaps ; nor was it per- mitted to their friends or kindred to be present, or to shed a tear over them, or any longer even to go and see them ; but guards were placed around, who marked signs of sorrow in each, and attended the putrid bodies till they were dragged to the Tiber ; where, floating in the stream, or driven upon the banks, none dared to burn them, none to touch them. Even the ordinary intercourse of humanity was intercepted by the violence of fear ; and in proportion as cruelty pre- vailed, commiseration was stifled." Tacitm. 15 After the example of Augustus, and to satisfy the clamors of the people, he loaned money without interest for three years to all who wanted to borrow. He first compelled "all money-lenders to advance two thirds of their capital on land, and the debtors to pay off at once the same proportion of their debts. " This was found insufficient to meet all the de- mands, and he loaned from the public treasury about five mill- ions of dollars. In order to obtain money to meet this and other drafts on the public treasury, ' ' he turned his mind to 16 /<*., book vi, chap. 19. 90 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. sheer robbery. It is certain that Cneius Lentulus, the augur, a man of vast estate, was so terrified and worried by his threats and importunities, that he was obliged to make him his heir. . . . Several persons, likewise of the first distinc- tion in Gaul, Spain, Syria, and Greece, had their estates confiscated upon such despicably trifling and shameless pre- tenses, that against some of them no other charge was pre- ferred than that they held large sums of ready money as part of their property. Old immunities, the rights of min- ing, and of levying tolls, were taken from several cities and private persons. " - Suetonius. 16 As for anything more about "this monster of his species," we shall only say in the words of Suetonius, "It would be tedious to relate all the numerous instances of his cruelty ; suffice it to give a few examples, in their different kinds. Not a day passed without the punishment of some person or other, not excepting holidays, or those appropriated to the worship of the gods. Some were tried even on New Year's Day. Of many who were condemned, their wives and children shared the same fate ; and for those who were sentenced to death, the relations were forbid to put on mourning. "Considerable rewards were voted for the prosecutors, and sometimes for the witnesses also. The information of any person, without exception, was taken, and all offenses were capital, even speaking a few words, though without any ill intention. A poet was charged with abusing Aga- memnon ; and a historian, for calling Brutus and Cassius ' the last of the Romans.' The two authors were immediately called to account, and their writings suppressed, though they had been well received some years before, and read in the hearing of Augustus. Some who were thrown into prison, were not only denied the solace of study, but de- barred from all company and conversation. Many persons, when summoned to trial, stabbed themselves at home, to 9 16 " Lives of the Caesars," Tiberius, chaps, xlviii, xlix. CALIGULA. ACCESSION OF CALIGULA. 91 avoid the distress and ignominy of a public condemnation, which they were certain would ensue. Others took poison in the Senate house. The wounds were bound up, and all who had not expired, were carried, half dead, and panting for life, to prison. Those who were put to death, were thrown down the Gemonian stairs, and then dragged into the Tiber. In one day, twenty were treated in this manner, and amongst them women and boys. Because, according to an ancient custom, it was not lawful to strangle virgins, the young girls were first deflowered by the executioner, and afterwards strangled. " Those who were desirous to die, were forced to live. For he thought death so slight a punishment, that upon hearing that Carnulius, one of the accused, who was under prosecution, had killed himself, he exclaimed, ' Carnulius has escaped me.' In calling over his prisoners, when one of them requested the favor of a speedy death, he replied, ' You are not yet restored to favor.' A man of consular rank writes in his annals that at table, where he himself was present with a large company, he was suddenly asked aloud by a dwarf who stood by amongst the buffoons, why Pa- conius, who was under a prosecution for treason, lived so long. Tiberius immediately reprimanded him for his pert- ness, but wrote to the Senate a few days after, to proceed without delay to the punishment of Paconius. " Suetonius. " Tiberius died March 16, A. D. 37, in the seventy-eighth year of his age and the twenty-third year of his reign, and was succeeded by CALIGULA. Caligula was the son of Germanicus, who was the adopted son of Tiberius. He was born and brought up in the camp. When he grew large enough to run about, the soldiers made him a pair of boots caliga, after the pattern of their own, and from that he got his name of ' ' Caligula, " that is, Little Boots. His real name was Caius. He was now twenty-five 17 " Lives of the Caesars," Tiberius, chaps. 1x1, Ixli. 92 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. years old, and had been with Tiberius for the last five years. " Closely aping Tiberius, he put on the same dress as he did from day to day, and in his language differed little from him. Whence the shrewd observation of Passienus the orator, afterward so famous, ' that never was a better slave nor a worse master. ' ' Tacitus. 18 He imitated Tiberius in his sav- age disposition, and the exercise of his vicious propensities, as closely as he did in his dress and language. If he were not worse than Tiberius, it was only because it was impos- sible to be worse. Like his pattern, he began his reign with such an appear- ance of gentleness and genuine ability, that there was universal rejoicing among the people out of grateful remem- brance of Germanicus, and among the soldiers and provin- cials who had known him in his childhood. As he followed the corpse of Tiberius to its burning, "He had to walk amidst altars, victims, and lighted torches, with prodigious crowds of people everywhere attending him, in transports of joy, and calling him, besides other auspicious names, by those of 'their star,' 'their chick,' 'their pretty puppet,' and 'bant- ling.' . . . Caligula himself inflamed this devotion, by prac- tising all the arts of popularity." Suetonius. 19 This appearance of propriety he kept up for eight months, and then, having become giddy with the height at which he stood, and drunken with the possession of absolute power, he ran wildly and greedily into all manner of excesses. He gave himself the titles of "Dutiful," "The Pious," "The Child of the Camp, the Father of the Armies," "The Greatest and Best Caesar." Suetonius. He caused him- self to be worshiped, not only in his images, but in his own person. Among the gods, Castor and Pollux were twin brothers representing the sun, and were the sons of Jupiter. Caligula would place himself between the statues of the twin brothers there to be worshiped by all votaries. And they 18 " Annals," book vi, chap. xx. 19 "Lives of the Caesars," Caligula, chaps, xiii, xv. 20 /d., chap. xxii. CALIGULA IMITATES THE GODS. 93 worshiped him, too ; some saluting him as Jupiter Latialis, that is, the Roman Jupiter, the guardian of the Roman people. He caused all the images of the gods that were famous either for beauty or popularity, to be brought from Greece, and their heads taken off and his put on instead, and then sent them back to be worshiped. He set up a temple, and established a priesthood in honor of his own divinity ; and in the temple he set up a statue of gold the exact image of himself, which he caused to be dressed every day exactly as he was. The sacrifices which were to be offered in the temple, were flamingos, peacocks, bustards, guineas, turkeys, and pheasants, each kind offered on successive days. ' ' The most opulent persons in the city offered themselves as candi- dates for the honor of being his priests, and purchased it successively at an immense price."- Suetonius. Zl Castor and Pollux had a sister who corresponded to the moon. Caligula therefore on nights when the moon was full, would invite her to come and stay with him. This Jupiter Latialis placed himself on full and familiar equality with Jupiter Capitolinus. He would walk up to the other Jupiter and whisper in his ear, and then turn his own ear, as if listening for a reply. Not only had Augustus and Romu- lus taken other men's wives, but Castor and Pollux, in the myth, had gone to a double wedding, and after the marriage had carried off both the brides with them. Caligula did the same thing. He went to the wedding of Caius Piso, and from the wedding supper carried off the bride with himself, and the next day issued a proclamation "that he had got a wife as Romulus and Augustus had dono , '' but in a few days he put her away, and two years afterward he ban- ished her. Lollia Paulina was the wife of a proconsul. She was with her husband in one of the provinces where he was in command of an army. , Caligula heard somebody say that her grandmother had been a very beautiful woman. He im- 9 94 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. mediately sent and bad Lollia Paulina brought from her husband, and made her his wife ; and her also soon after- wards he put away. But he found a perfect wanton, by the name of Csesonia, who was neither handsome nor young, and her he kept constantly. He lived in incest with all three of his sisters, but one of them, Drusilla, was a special favorite. Her he took from her husband, a man of consular rank, and made her his wife and kept her so as long as she lived, and when she died, he ordered a public mourning for her, during which time he made it a capital offense for anybody to laugh, or bathe, or eat with his parents or his own family ; and ever afterwards his most solemn oath was to sware by the divinity of Drusilla. He was so prodigal that in less than a year, besides the regular revenue of the empire, he spent the sum of about one hundred millions of dollars. He built a bridge of boats across the Gulf of Baiae, from Baiae to Puteoli, a distance of three and a half miles. He twice distributed to the people nearly fifteen dollars apiece, and often gave splendid feasts to the Senate and to the knights with their families, at which he presented official garments to the men, and purple scarfs to the women and children. He exhibited a large number of games continuing all day. Sometimes he would throw large sums of money and other valuables to the crowd to be scrambled for. He likewise made public feasts at which, to every man, he would give a basket of bread with other victuals. He would exhibit stage plays in different parts of the city at night time, and cause the whole city to be illumi- nated ; he exhibited these games and public plays not only in Eome, but in Sicily, Syracuse, and Gaul. As for himself, in his feasts he exerted himself to set the grandest suppers and the strangest dishes, at which he would drink pearls of immense value, dissolved in vinegar, and serve up loaves of bread and other victuals modeled in gold. He built two ships each of ten banks of oars, the poops of which were made to blaze with jewels, with sails of CALIGULA'S PRODIGALITY. 95 various parti-colors, with baths, galleries, and saloons ; in which he would sail along the coast feasting and reveling, with the accompaniments of dancing and concerts of music. At one of these revels he made a present of nearly one hun- dred thousand dollars to a favorite charioteer. His favorite horse he called Incitatus, go ahead, and on the day be- fore the celebration of the games of the circus, he would set a guard of soldiers to keep perfect quiet in the neighborhood, that the repose of Go-ahead might not be disturbed. This horse he arrayed in purple and jewels, and built for him a marble stable with an ivory manger. He would occasionally have the horse eat at the imperial table, and at such times would feed him on gilded grain in a golden basin of the fin- est workmanship. He proposed at last to make the horse consul of the empire. Having spent all the money, though an enormous sum, that had been laid up by Tiberius, it became necessary to raise funds sufficient for his extravagance, and to raise it he employed ' ' every mode of false accusation, confiscation, and taxation that could be invented." He commanded that the people should make their wills in his favor. He even caused this rule to date back as far as the beginning of the reign of Tiberius, and from that time forward any centurion of the first rank who had not made Tiberius or Caligula his heir, his will was annulled, and all his property confiscated. The wills of all others were set aside if any person would say that the maker had intended to make the emperor his heir. This caused those who were yet living to make him joint heir with their friends or with their children. If he found that such wills had been made and the maker did not die soon, he declared that they were only making game of him, and sent them poisoned cakes. The remains of the paraphernalia of his spectacles, the furniture of the palace occupied by Augustus and Tiberius, and all the clothes, furniture, slaves, and even freedmen be- longing to his sisters whom he banished, were put up at 96 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. auction, and the prices were run up so high as to ruin the purchasers. At one of these sales a certain Aponius Satur- ninus, sitting on a bench, became sleepy and fell to nodding ; the emperor noticed it, and told the auctioneer not to over- look the bids of the man who was nodding so often. Every nod was taken as a new bid, and when the sale was over, the dozing bidder found himself in possession of thirteen gladiatorial slaves, for which he was in debt nearly half a million dollars. If the bidding was not prompt enough nor high enough to suit him, he would rail at the bidders for be- ing stingy, and demand if they were not ashamed to be richer than he was. He levied taxes of every kind that he could invent, and no kind of property or person was exempt from some sort of taxation. Much complaint was made that the law for im- posing this taxation had never been published, and that much grievance was caused from want of sufficient knowl- edge of the law. He then published the law, but had it written in very small characters and posted up in a corner so that nobody could obtain a copy of it. His wife Csesonia gave birth to a daughter, upon which Caligula complained of his poverty, caused by the burdens to which he was sub- jected, not only as an emperor but as a father, and therefore made a general collection for the support of the child, and gave public notice that he would receive New Year's gifts the first of the following January. At the appointed time he took his station in the vestibule of his palace, and the people of all ranks came and threw to him their presents k 'by the handfuls and lapfuls. At last, being seized with an invincible desire of feeling money, taking off his slippers lie repeatedly walked over great . heaps of gold coin spread upon the spacious floor, and then laying himself down, rolled his whole body in gold over and over again." Suetonius. His cruelty was as deadly as his lust and prodigality were extravagant. At the dedication of that bridge of boats which W M., chap. xlii. CLAUDIUS. THE DELIRIUM OF POWER. 97 he built, he spent two days reveling and parading over the bridge. Before his departure, he invited a number of people to come to him on the bridge, all of whom without distinc- tion of age, or sex, or rank, or character, he caused to be thrown headlong into the sea, " thrusting down with poles and oars those who, to save themselves, had got hold of the rudders of the ship. " At one time when meat had risen to very high prices, he commanded that the wild beasts that were kept for the arena, should be fed on criminals, who, without distinction as to degrees of crime, were given to be devoured. During his revels he would cause criminals, and even innocent persons, to be racked and beheaded. He seemed to gloat over the thought that the lives of mankind were in his bands, and that at a word he could do what he would. Once at a grand entertainment, at which both the consuls were seated next to him, he suddenly burst out into violent laughter, and when the consuls asked him what he was laughing about, he replied, "Nothing, but that upon a sin- gle word of mine you might both have your throats cut." Often, as he kissed or fondled the neck of his wife or mis- tress, he would exclaim, ' ' So beautiful a throat must be cut whenever I please." All these are but parts of his ways, but the rest are either too indecent or too horrible to relate. ' At last, after indulging more than three years of his savage rage, he was killed by a company of conspirators, with the tribune of the praetorian guards at their head, having reigned three years, ten months, and eight days, and lived twenty-nine years. He was succeeded by CLAUDIUS. The soldiers not only killed an emperor, but they made another one. There was at that time, living in the palace, an uncle to Caligula, named Claudius, now fifty years old. Though he seems to have had as much sense as any of them, 98 TBE ROMAN MONARCHY. he was slighted and counted as a fool by those around him. Even his mother, when she would remark upon any one's dullness, would use the comparison, "He is a greater fool than my son Claudius." About the palace he was made the butt of the jests and practical jokes of the courtiers and even of the buffoons. At supper he would cram himself full of victuals, and drink till he was drunk ; and then go to sleep at the table. At this, the company would pelt him with olive stones or scraps of victuals ; and the buffoons would prod him with a cane, or snip him with a whip to wake him. And when he had gone to sleep, while he lay snoring, they would put slippers on his hands, that when he should wake and attempt to rub his eyes open, he would rub his face with the slippers. The night that Caligula was killed, Claudius, fearing for his own life, crept into a balcony, and hid himself behind the curtains of the door. The soldiers, rushing through the palace, happened to see his feet sticking out, and one of them grabbed him by the heels and demanding to know who owned them, dragged forth Claudius ; and when he discovered who he was, exclaimed, "Why, this is German- icus ; let 's make him emperor ! " The other soldiers in the band immediately adopted the idea, saluted him as emperor, set him on a litter, and carried him on their shoulders to the camp of the praetorian guards. The next day while the Senate deliberated, the people cried out that they would have one master, and that he should be Claudius. The sol- diers assembled under arms, and took the oath of allegiance to him ; upon which he promised them about seven hundred dollars apiece. By the mildness and correctness of his administration, he soon secured the favor and affection of the whole people. Having once gone a short distance out of the city, a report was spread that he had been waylaid and killed. "The people never ceased cursing the soldiers for traitors, and the Senate as parricides, until one or two persons, and presently CLAUDIUS AND HIS WIVES. 09 after several others, were brought by the magistrates upon the rostra, who assured them that he was alive, and not far from the city, on his way home." Suetonius. As he sat to judge causes, the lawyers would openly re- prove him and make fun of him. One of these one day, making excuses why a witness did not appear, stated that it was impossible for him to appear, but did not tell why. Claudius insisted upon knowing, and after several questions had been evaded, the statement was brought forth that the man was dead, upon which Claudius replied, " I think that is a sufficient excuse." When he would start away from the tribunal, they would call him back. If he insisted upon going, they would seize hold of his dress or take him by the heels, and make him stay until they were ready for him to go. A Greek once having a case before him, got into a dispute with him, and called out loud, "You are an old fool ; " and a Roman knight once being prosecuted upon a false charge, being provoked at the character of the wit- nesses brought against him, upbraided Claudius with folly and cruelty, and threw some books and a writing pencil in his face. He pleased the populace with distributions of grain and money, and displays of magnificent games and spectacles. This is the Claudius mentioned in Acts xviii, 2, who com- manded all Jews to depart from Rome. This he did, says Suetonius, because they "were continually making dis- turbances at the instigation of one Chrestus." These dis- turbances arose from contentions of the Jews against the Christians about Christ. As the Christians were not yet distinguished from the Jews, the decree of banishment like- wise made no distinction, and when he commanded all Jews to depart from Rome, Christians were among them. One of his principal favorites was that Felix, governor of Judea, mentioned in Acts xxiii, 24, before whom Paul pleaded, and who trembled as the apostle "reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come." 23 "Lives of the Caesars," Claudius, chap. xil. 100 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. Claudius was not as bad as either Tiberius or Caligula, but what he himself lacked in this respect was amply made up by his wives. "In his marriage, as in all else, Claudius had been pre-eminent in misfortune. He lived in an age of which the most frightful sign of depravity was that its women were, if possible, a shade worse than its men, and it was the misery of Claudius, as it finally proved his ruin, to have been united by marriage to the very worst among them all. Princesses like the Bernice, and the Drusilla, and the Salome, and the Herodias of the sacred historians, were in this age a familiar spectacle ; but none of them were so wicked as two at least of Claudius's wives. He was be- trothed or married no less than five times. The lady first destined for his bride had been repudiated because her par- ents had offended Augustus ; the next died on the very day intended for her nuptials. By his first actual wife, Urgula- nia, whom he had married in early youth, he had two chil- dren, Drusus and Claudia ; Drusus was accidentally choked in boyhood while trying to swallow a pear which had been thrown up into the air. Very shortly after the birth of Claudia, discovering the unfaithfulness of Urgulania, Clau- dius divorced her, and ordered the child to be stripped naked and exposed to die. His second wife, ./Elia Petina, seems to have been an unsuitable person, and her also he divorced. His third and fourth wives lived to earn a colossal infamy Yaleria Messalina for her shameless character, Agrippina the younger for her unscrupulous ambition. "Messalina, when she married, could scarcely have been fifteen years old, yet she at once assumed a dominant posi- tion, and secured it by means of the most unblushing wickedness. But she did not reign so absolutely undis- turbed as to be without her own jealousies and apprehen- sions ; and these were mainly kindled by Julia and Agrip- pina, the two nieces of the emperor. They were, no less than herself, beautiful, brilliant, and evil-hearted women, quite ready to make their own coteries, and to dispute, as MESSALINA'S DEPRAVITY. 101 far as they dared, the supremacy of a bold but reckless rival. They, too, used their arts, their wealth, their rank, their political influence, their personal fascinations, to secure for themselves a band of adherents, ready, when the proper moment arrived, for any conspiracy. . . . " The life of this beautiful princess, short as it was, for she died at a very early age, was enough to make her name a proverb of everlasting infamy. For a time she appeared irresistible. Her personal fascination had won for her an unlimited sway over the facile mind of Claudius, and she had either won over by her intrigues, or terrified by her pitiless severity, the noblest of the Romans and the most powerful of the freedmen." Farrar. zi She became " so vehemently enamoured of Caius Silius, the handsomest of the Roman youth, that she obliged him to divorce his wife, Julia Silana, a lady of high quality," that she might have him to herself. ' ' Nor was Silius blind to the danger and malignity of his crime ; but, as it was certain destruction to decline her suit, and there were some hopes of beguiling Claudius, while great rewards were held out to him, he was content to take the chance of what might happen thereafter, and enjoy the present advantages. The empress proceeded not stealthily, but went to his house fre- quently, with a numerous train, accompanied him incessantly abroad, loaded him with presents and honors; and at -last, as if the fortune of the empire had been transferred with the emperor's wife, at the house of her adulterer were now seen the slaves, freedmen, and equipage of the prince." Tacitus.** Claudius made a journey to Ostia, and while he was gone, Messalina publicly celebrated her marriage with Silius, with royal ceremony. ' ' I am aware that it will appear fabulous that any human beings should have exhibited such recklessness of consequences ; and that, in a city where everything was known and talked of, any one, much more a 24 "Seekers after God," chap, vi, par. 10-12; and chap. Ix, par. 2. 25 " Annals," book xi, chap. xli. 102 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. consul elect, should have met the emperor's wife, on a stated day, in the presence of persons called in, to seal the deeds, as for the purpose of procreation, and that she should have heard the words of the augurs, entered the house of the hus- band, sacrificed to the gods, sat down among the guests at the nuptial banquet, exchanged kisses and embraces, and in fine passed the night in unrestrained conjugal intercourse. But I would not dress up my narrative with fictions to give it an air of marvel, rather than relate what has been stated to me or written by my seniors." Tacitus. The report of all this was carried to Claudius, which so terrified him that but for his favorites, he would undoubtedly nave surrendered the empire to Silius. Several of these, however, rallied him with the assurance that they would stand by him and help him through, and they persuaded him to start for Rome ; but fearing that even then, if Messalina should meet him, she would persuade him to pardon her, they took him in the same carriage with themselves, and all the way as they went, one of them kept continually exclaim- ing, "O the villainy, O the treason!" As for Messalina, "she never wallowed in greater voluptuousness ; it was then the middle of autumn, and in her house she exhibited a rep- resentation of the vintage : the winepresses were plied, the wine vats flowed, and round them danced women begirt with skins like Bacchanalians at their sacrifices, or under the maddening inspiration of their deity : she herself, with her hair loose and flowing, waved a thyrsus ; by her side Silius, crowned with ivy, and wearing buskins, tossed his head about ; while around them danced the wanton choir in ob- streperous revelry. It is reported that Yectius Valens, having in a frolic climbed to an exceeding high tree, when asked what he saw, answered, ' a terrible storm from Ostia. ' ' Tacitus. Z1 That storm, was coming swiftly, and when it came, Messalina was given the privilege of killing herself. She z '/d, chap, xxvii. 27 Id., chap. xxxi. AGRIPPINA THE TIGRESS. 103 plied the dagger twice but failed, and then a tribune ran her through with his sword. Word was carried to Claudius while he was sitting at a feast, that Messalina was no more, to which he made neither reply nor inquiry, " but called for a cup of wine and proceeded in the usual ceremonies of the feast, nor did he, indeed, during the following days, mani- fest any symptom of disgust or joy, of resentment or sorrow, nor, in short, of any human affection ; not when he beheld the accusers of his wife exulting at her death ; not when he looked upon her mourning children." Tacitus Messalina was dead ; but bad as she had been, a worse woman took her place. This was Agrippina, sister of Caligula, niece of Claudius, and the mother of Nero. "Whatever there was of possible affection in the tigress nature of Agrippina was now absorbed in the person of her child. For that child, from its cradle to her own death by his means, she toiled and sinned. The fury of her own ambition, inextricably linked with the uncontrollable fierce- ness of her love for this only son, henceforth directed every action of her life. Destiny had made her the sister of one emperor ; intrigue elevated her into the wife of another : her own crimes made her the mother of a third. And at first sight her career might have seemed unusually success- ful ; for while still in the prime of life she was wielding, first in the name of her husband, and then in that of her son, no mean share in the absolute government of the Roman world. But meanwhile that same unerring retribu- tion, whose stealthy footsteps in the rear of the triumphant criminal we can track through page after page of history, was stealing nearer and nearer to her with uplifted hand. When she had reached the dizzy pinnacle of gratified love and pride to which she had waded through so many a deed of sin and blood, she was struck down into terrible ruin and violent, shameful death by the hand of that very son for whose sake she had so often violated the laws of virtue and 48 Id., chap, xxxviii. 104 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. integrity, and spurned so often the pure and tender obliga- tion which even the heathen had been taught by the voice of God within their conscience to recognize and to adore. "Intending that her son should marry Octavia, the daughter of Claudius, her first step was to drive to death Silanus, a young nobleman to whom Octavia had already been betrothed. Her next care was to get rid of all rivals possible or actual. Among the former were the beautiful Calpurnia and her own sister-in-law, Domitia Lepida. Among the latter was the wealthy Lollia Paulina, against whom she trumped up an accusation of sorcery and treason, upon which her wealth was confiscated, but her life spared by the emperor, who banished her from Italy. This half vengeance was not enough for the mother of Nero. Like the daughter of Herodias in sacred history, she dispatched a tribune with orders to bring her the head of her enemy ; and when it was brought to her, and she found a difficulty in recognizing those withered and ghastly features of a once celebrated beauty, she is said with her own hand to have lifted one of the lips, and to have satisfied herself that this was indeed the head of Lollia. . . . Well may Adolf Stahr observe that Shakespeare's Lady Macbeth and husband- murdering Gertrude are mere children by the side of this awful giant-shape of steely feminine cruelty." Farrar. By the horrible crimes and fearful sinning of Agrippina, Nero became emperor of Rome, A. D. 57, at the age of seventeen. As in the account already given, there is enough to show what the Roman monarchy really was ; and as that is the purpose of this chapter, it is not necessary any further to portray the frightful enormities of individual emperors. It is sufficient to say of Nero, that, in degrading vices, shameful licentiousness, and horrid cruelty, he transcended all who had been before him. It is evident that for the production of such men as Antony and Augustus, Tiberius and Caligula, Claudius and Nero, with such women as their mothers and wives to say 89 " Seekers after God," chap, x, par. 5. ROMAN SOCIETY IN GENERAL. 105 nothing of Galba, Otho, Vitellius, and Domitian, who quickly followed in direct succession and in so short a time, there must of necessity have been a condition of so- ciety in general which corresponded to the nature of the product. Such was in fact the case. "An evil day is approaching when it becomes recognized in a community that the only standard of social distinction is wealth. That day was soon followed in Rome by its unavoidable consequence, a government founded upon two domestic elements, corruption and terrorism. No language can describe the state of that capital after the civil wars. The accumulation of power and wealth gave rise to a uni- versal depravity. Law ceased to be of any value. A suitor must deposit a bribe before a trial could be had. The social fabric was a festering mass of rottenness. The people had become a populace ; the aristocracy was demoniac ; the city was a hell. No crime that the annals of human wickedness can show was left unperpetrated ; remorseless murders ; the betrayal of parents, husbands, wives, friends ; poisoning reduced to a system ; adultery degenerating into incests and crimes that cannot be written. "Women of the higher class were so lascivious, depraved, and dangerous, that men could not be compelled to contract matrimony with them ; marriage was displaced by concubin- age ; even virgins were guilty of inconceivable immodesties ; great officers of state arid ladies of the court, of promiscuous bathings and naked exhibitions. In the time of Caesar it had become necessary for the government to interfere and actually put a premium on marriage. He gave rewards to women who had many children ; prohibited those who were under forty-five years of age, and who had no children, from wearing jewels and riding in litters, hoping by such social disabilities to correct the evil. It went on from bad to worse, so that Augustus, in view of the general avoidance of legal marriage and resort to concubinage with slaves, was compelled to impose penalties on the unmarried to enact 10 106 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. that they should not inherit by will except from relations. Not that the Roman women refrained from the gratification of their desires ; their depravity impelled them to such wicked practices as cannot be named in a modern book. They actually reckoned the years, not by the consuls, but by the men they had lived with. To be childless and therefore without the natural restraint of a family, was looked upon as a singular felicity. Plutarch correctly touched the point when he said that the Romans married to be heirs and not to have heirs. " Of offenses that do not rise to the dignity of atrocity, but which excite our loathing, such as gluttony and the most debauched luxury, the annals of the times furnish disgusting proofs. It was said, ' They eat that they may vomit, and vomit that they may eat.' At the taking of Perusium, three hundred of the most distinguished citizens were solemnly sacrificed at the altar of Divius Julius by Octavian. Are these the deeds of civilized men, or the riotings of cannibals drunk with blood ? "The higher classes on all sides exhibited a total extinc- tion of moral principle ; the lower were practical atheists. Who can peruse the annals of the emperors without being shocked at the manner in which men died, meeting their fate with the obtuse tranquillity that characterizes beasts? A centurion with a private mandate appears, and forthwith the victim opens his veins, and dies in a warm bath. At the best, all that was done was to strike at the tyrant. Men de- spairingly acknowledged that the system itself was utterly past cure. "That in these statements I do not exaggerate, hear what Tacitus says : ' The holy ceremonies of religion were violated ; adultery reigning without control ; the adjacent islands filled with exiles ; rocks and desert places stained with clandestine murders, and Rome itself a theater of hor- rors, where nobility of descent and splendor of fortune ULTIMATE PAGANISM. 107 marked men out for destruction ; where the vigor of mind that aimed at civil dignities, and the modesty that declined them, were offenses without distinction ; where virtue was a crime that led to certain ruin ; where the guilt of informers and the wages of their iniquity were alike detestable ; where the sacerdotal order, the consular dignity, the government of provinces, and even the cabinet of the prince, were seized by that execrable race as their lawful prey ; where nothing was sacred, nothing safe from the hand of rapacity ; where slaves were suborned, or by their own malevolence excited against their masters ; where freemen betrayed their patrons, and he who had lived without an enemy died by the treachery of a friend. ' ' Draper . 30 To complete this dreadful picture requires but the touch of Inspiration. "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools ; and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. Where- fore God also gave them up to uncleanness, through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies be- tween themselves : who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Crea- tor, who is blessed forever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections. For even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature : and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another ; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in them- selves that recompense of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient : being filled with all unrighteous- ness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness ; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, in- 80 " Intellectual Development of Europe," chap, viii, par. 22-24. 108 THE ROMAN MONARCHY. ventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without un- derstanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful : who, knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death ; not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." 31 When this scripture was read by the Christians in Rome, they knew from daily observation that it was but a faithful description of Roman society as it was. And Roman society as it was, was but the resultant of pagan civilization, and the logic, in its last analysis, of the pagan religion. Roman society as it was, was ULTIMATE PAGANISM. 31 Rom. i, 22-32. AGRIPPINA. CLAUDIUS. LI VI A. TIBERIUS. CHAPTER IV. THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." which Rome was in its supreme place, the other 1 cities of the empire, Alexandria, Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth, etc. were in their narrower spheres; for it was the licentiousness of Greece and the East which had given to the corruption of Rome a deeper dye. Into that world of iniquity, Jesus Christ sent, as sheep among wolves, a little band of disciples carrying hope to the despairing, joy to the sorrowing, comfort to the afflicted, relief to the distressed, peace to the perplexed, and to all a message of merciful forgiveness of sins, of the gift of the righteousness of God, and of a purity and power which would cleanse the soul from all unrighteousness of heart and life, and plant there instead the perfect purity of the life of the Son of God and the courage of an everlasting joy. This gospel of peace and of the power of God unto salvation they were commanded to go into all the world and preach to every creature. The disciples went everywhere preaching the word, and before the death of men who were then in the prime of life this good news of the grace of God had actually been preached in all the then known world. Rom. i, 8 and x, 18 ; Col. i, 6, 23. And by it many were brought to the knowledge of the peace and power of God, revealed in the gospel of Jesus Christ. "In every congregation there were prayers to God that he would listen to the sighing of the prisoner and captive, and have mercy on [109] HO THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." those who were ready to die. For the slave and his master there was one law and one hope, one baptism, one Saviour, one Judge. In times of domestic bereavement the Christian slave doubtless often consoled his pagan mistress with the suggestion that our present separations are only for a little while, and revealed to her willing ear that there is another world a land in which we rejoin our dead. How is it possible to arrest the spread of a faith which can make the broken heart leap with joy? " Draper. 1 Yet to arrest the spread of that faith there were many long, earnest, and persistent efforts by the Roman empire. Before entering, however, upon the examination of this sub- ject as it is, it is necessary to notice a point that has been much misunderstood or else much misrepresented ; that is the imperial or ''Ten Persecutions." In the Church and State scheme of the fourth century, the theory of the bishops was that the kingdom of God was come; and to maintain the theory it became necessary to pervert the meaning of both Scripture history and Scripture prophecy. Accordingly, as the antitype of the ten plagues of Egypt, and as the fulfillment of the prophecy of the ten horns which made war with the Lamb (Rev. xvii, 12-14), there was invented the theory of ten persecutions of the Christians inflicted by the ten emperors, Nero, Domitian, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Septimius Severus, Maximin, Decius, Yalerian, Aurelian, and Diocletian. Some of these persecuted the Christians, as Nero, Marcus Aurelius, De- cius, and Diocletian ; others were as gentle toward the Christians as toward anybody else ; and yet others not named in the list, persecuted everybody but the Christians. The truth is that so far as the emperors were concerned, taken one with another, from Nero to Diocletian, the Chris- tians fared as well as anybody else. In this discussion and in the study of this subject every- where, it must ever be borne in mind that Christianity was wholly outlawed in the Roman empire, and that every one 1 " Intellectual Development of Europe," chap, ix, par. 8. ROMAN LAW AND THE JEW8. m who professed it became by the very fact of his profession an outlaw an enemy to the emperor and people of Rome, and guilty of high treason. So long as the Christians were confounded with the Jews, no persecution befell them from the .Roman State, because the Roman empire had recognized the Jewish relig- ion as lawful ; consequently when the Emperor Claudius commanded all Jews to depart from Rome, Christians were included among them, as for instance Aquila and Priscilla. Acts xviii, 1, 2. And when in Corinth, under Gallic the Roman governor of the province of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection against Paul upon the charge that "this fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law," Gal- lio replied : " If it were a matter of wrong or wicked lewd- ness, O ye Jews, reason would that I should bear with you : but if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it ; for I will be no judge of such matters." And with this, "he drave them from the judgment seat." Acts xviii, 12-16. Also when the centurion Lysias had rescued Paul from the murderous Jews in Jerusalem, and would send him for protection to Felix the governor, he wrote to Felix th us : "When I would have known the cause where- fore they accused him, I brought him forth into their council : whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds." Chap, xxiii, 28, 29. To please the Jews, Felix left Paul in prison. When Festus came in and had given him a hearing, and would bring his case before King Agrippa, he spoke thus of the matter: "There is a certain man left in bonds by Felix: about whom, when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews informed me, desiring to have judgment against him. To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have license to answer for himself concerning the crime laid 112 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." against him. Therefore, when they were come hither with- out any delay on the morrow, I sat on the judgment seat, and commanded the man to be brought forth. Against whom, when the accusers stood up, they brought none accusation of such things as I supposed : but had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive. And because I doubted of such manner of questions, I asked him whether he would go to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these matters. But when Paul had appealed to be reserved unto the hearing of Augustus, I commanded him to be kept till I might send him to Csesar." And when Agrippa had heard him, the unanimous decision was, "This man doeth nothing worthy of death or of bonds," and Agrippa declared, "This man might have been set at liberty, if he had not appealed unto Caesar." Acts xxv, 1421 ; xxvi, 31, 32. And even when he had been heard twice by Caesar Nero as it was still but a controversy between Jews concern- ing questions of their own, the Roman power refused to take cognizance of the case, and Paul, a Christian, was released. But when Christianity had spread among the Gentiles and a clear distinction was made and recognized between 'the Christians and the Jews, by all parties, and Christianity ap- peared as a new religion not recognized by the Roman law, then came the persecution of Christians by the Horn an State. The first persecution of the Christians was that which was inflicted by NERO, in A. D. 64, although it was only the horrid cruelty in- flicted that made his punishment of the Christians conspicu- ous above that of many others upon whom the rage of that tyrant fell. For, "Except that his murders were commonly prompted by need or fear, arid therefore fell oftenest on the rich and powerful, it can hardly be said that one class suf- fered from them more terribly than another. His family, his friends, the senators, the knights, philosophers and THE PERSECUTION BY NERO. H3 Christians, Romans and provincials, were all decimated by them. " Merivale* July 19, A. D. 64, the tenth year of Nero's reign, a fire broke out in the city of Rome, which raged unchecked for six days. The stricken people had barely begun to collect their thoughts after the fire had subsided, when flames burst out a second time, in another quarter of the city, and raged for three days. Taken together, the two conflagrations destroyed nearly the whole of the city. Of the fourteen districts into which the city was divided, only four re- mained uninjured. Nero was universally hated for his des- perate tyranny. A rumor was soon spread and readily believed, that while the city was burning, he stood watching it, and chanting the "Sack of Troy" to an accompaniment which he played upon his lyre. From this the rumor grew into a report, and it was also believed, that Nero himself had ordered the fires to be kindled. It \^is further insinuated that his object in burning the city was to build it anew upon a much more magnificent scale, and bestow upon it his own name. Whether any of these rumors or suspicions were cer- tainly true, cannot be positively stated ; but whether true or not, they were certainly believed, and the hatred of the people was intensified to such fierceness that Nero soon discovered that the ruin of the city was universally laid to his charge. He endeavored tp allay the rising storm : he provided shelter, and supplied other urgent necessaries for the multitude. Vows and great numbers of burnt offerings to the gods were made, but all to no purpose. The signs of public dissatisfaction only became more significant. It be- came essential that the emperor should turn their suspicion from him, or forfeit the throne and his life. The crisis was a desperate one, and desperately did he meet it. There was a little band of Christians known in the city. They were already hated by the populace. These were accused, con- demned, and tortured as the destroyers of the city. Tacitus 2 "Romans Under the Empire," chap. Iv, par. 6. 114 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." tells of the fate of those to whom he says "the vulgar gave the name of Christians " : "He [Nero] inflicted the most exquisite tortures on those men who, under the vulgar appellation of Christians, were already branded with deserved infamy. They derived their name and origin from Christ, who in the reign of Tiberius had suffered death by the sentence of the proc- urator, Pontius Pilate. For awhile this dire superstition was checked ; but it again burst forth ; and not only spread itself over Judea, the first seat of this mischievous sect, but was even introduced into Rome, the common asylum which receives and protects whatever is impure, what- ever is atrocious. The confessions of those who were seized, discovered a great multitude of their accomplices, and they were all convicted, not so much for the crime of setting fire to the city, as for their hatred of human kind. They died in torments, and their torments were embittered by insult and derision. Some were nailed on crosses ; others sewn in the skins of wild beasts, and exposed to the fury of dogs ; others again, smeared over with combustible materials, were used as torches to illu- minate the darkness of the night. The gardens of Nero were destined for the melancholy spectacle, which was accompanied with a horse race, and honored with the presence of the emperor, who mingled with the populace in the dress and attitude of a charioteer. The guilt of the Christians deserved indeed the most exemplary punishment, but the public abhorrence was changed into commiseration, from the opinion that those unhappy wretches were sacrificed, not so much to the public welfare as to the cruelty of a jealous tyrant." Tacitus. 3 This cruel subterfuge accomplished the purpose intended by the emperor, to deliver him from the angry suspicion of the populace. This persecution, however, as directed by Nero, did not extend beyond the city, and ceased with that one effort. And from that time, for the space of nearly two hundred years till the reign of Decius, A. D. 249-251 there was no imperial persecution in the city of Rome. ; ' During that period, the Christians were in general as free and secure as other inhabitants of Home. Their assemblies were no more disturbed than the synagogues of the Jews, or the rights of other foreign religions." M-ilman.* 3 " Annals," book xv, chap. xliv. I adopt Gibbon's Translation. See " De- cline and Fall," chap, xvi, par. 14. 4 "History of Christianity," book iv, chap, ii, par. 17, note. GOVERNMENT OF DOMITIAN. H5 DOMITIAN, who is next named in the list of persecutors, was so jealous of his imperial power and withal such a downright coward, that he was afraid of every man who was, or might become, popular, or from any cause conspicuous. His suspicions were constantly creating imaginary plots against his throne and his life, and his fears welcomed any tale of treason or of plot. There was an ample number of flatterers and sycophants who voluntarily assumed the vile office of in- formers, to have satisfied perhaps any man in the world but Domitian. He, however, was not content with this. He deliberately hired every man in the empire who was willing to sell himself to such service. And there were multitudes who were willing so to sell themselves. This system had been employed by others, but "Domitian seems, of all the emperors, to have carried it furthest, and adopted it most systematically. It was an aggravation rather than an extenuation of his crime that he seduced irito his service men of high rank and character, and turned the Senate into a mob of rivals for the disgrace of thus basely serving him. The instruments of his jealous precaution rose in a gradu- ated hierarchy. The knights and senators trembled before a Massa Bsebius, a Carus, and a Latinus ; but these delators trembled in their turn before the prince of delators, Mem- mius Regulus, and courted him, not always successfully, by the surrender of their estates or their mistresses. . . . The best and noblest of the citizens were still marked out as the prey of delators whose patron connived at enormities which bound their agents more closely to himself, and made his protection more necessary to them. The haughty nobler, quailed in silence under a system in which every act, every word, every sigh, was noted against them, and disgrace, exile, and death followed upon secret whispers. The fears of Domitian increased with his severities. He listened to the tales not of senators and consulars only, but of the hum- 116 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." blest officials arid even of private soldiers. Often, says Epictetus, was the citizen, sitting in the theater, entrapped by a disguised legionary beside him, who pretended to mur- mur against the emperor, till he had led his unsuspecting neighbor to confide to him his own complaints, and then skulked away to denounce him." Merivale? Such a system gave full and perfect freedom to vent every kind of petty spite ; and not only was freedom given to it, but by the informers' receiving a share of the property of the accused, a premium was put upon it. Many were put to death to allay Domitian's fears. Large numbers of others were either put to death or banished for the sake of their property, and yet many others were executed or banished upon charges invented by the informers to satisfy their per- sonal hatred or to maintain with the emperor their standing of loyalty. Among the victims of this universal treachery, some Christians were numbered. Hated as they were, it would have been strange indeed had there been none. Among these was the apostle John, who was banished to the Isle of Patmos. There were two others whose names we know Flavius Clemens and his wife Domitilla. Clem- ens was the cousin, and Domitilla was the niece, of Domi- tian. Clemens had enjoyed the favor of the emperor for a long time, and attained the honor of the consulship. The term of his office, however, had hardly more than expired when he was accused, condemned, and executed ; and Domi- tilla was banished to a desolate island on the western coast of Italy. The charge against them was "atheism and Jew- ish manners," "which cannot with any propriety be applied except to the Christians, as they were obscurely and imper- fectly viewed by the magistrates and by the writers of that period." - Gibbon. 6 A great number of other persons were involved in the same accusation as were Clemens and Domitilla, and like- 5 "Romans Under the Empire," chap. Ixii, par. 17. 6 " Decline and Fall," chap, xvi, par. 18. Two REPUBLICS. ID FLINT AND THE CHRISTIANS. H7 wise met the same fate with them confiscation of goods and banishment or death. Yet it is with no manner of jus- tice or propriety that this has been singled out as a persecu- tion against the church, or of Christians as such ; because at the same time there were thousands of people of all classes who suffered the same things and from the same source. This is granting that Clemens was killed and Domitilla ban- ished really on account of their religion. Considering their kinship to the emperor, and the standing of Clemens, it is fairly questionable whether it was not for political reasons that they were dealt with, and whether their religion was not the pretext rather than the cause, of their punishment. And for political crimes especially it was no unusual thing for all of a man's friends and relations to be included in the same proscription with himself. "This proscription took place about eight months before Domitian's death, at a period when he was tormented by the utmost jealousy of all around, and when his heart was hardened to acts of unparalleled bar- barity ; and it seems more likely that it was counseled by abject fear for his own person or power, than by concern for the religious interests of the State." Merivale. 1 In September, A. D. 96, Domitian was succeeded by NEKVA, whose temper and administration were directly contrary to those of Domitian. lie reversed the cruel decrees of Domi- tian, recalled the banished, and prosecuted instead of en- couraged the informers. Nerva was succeeded in A. D. 98 by- TEA JAN, under whom Pliny the Younger was governor of the province of Bithynia. In that province he found Christianity so prevalent that the worship of the gods was almost deserted. He undertook to correct this irregularity ; but this being a new sort of business with him, lie was soon involved in 7 " Romans Under the Empire," chap. Ixii, par. 15. 118 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." questions that he could not easily decide to his own satisfac- tion, and he concluded to address the emperor for the necessary instructions. He therefore wrote to Trajan as follows : "Sir : It is my constant method to apply myself to you for the reso- lution of all my doubts ; for who can better govern my dilatory way of proceeding or instruct my ignorance? I have never been present at the examination of the Christians [by others], on which account I am unac- quainted with what uses to be inquired into, and what and how far they used to be punished ; nor are my doubts small, whether there be not a distinction to be made between the ages [of the accused], and whether tender youth ought to have the same punishment with strong men ? whether there be not room for pardon upon repentance ? or whether it may not be an advantage to one that had been a Christian, that he has forsaken Christianity ? whether the bare name, without any crimes besides, or the crimes adhering to that name, be to be punished ? In the meantime 1 have taken this course about those who have been brought before me as Christians : I asked them whether they were Christians or not. If they confessed that they were Christians, I asked them again, and a third time, intermixing threatenings with the ques- tions. If they persevered in their confessions, I ordered them to be executed ; for I did not doubt but, let their confessions be of any sort whatsoever, this positiveness and inflexible obstinacy deserved to be pun- ished. There have been some of this mad sect whom I took notice of in particular as Roman citizens, that they might be sent to that city. After some time, as is usual in such examinations, the crime spread itself, and many more cases came before me. A libel was sent to me, though with- out an author, containing many names [of persons accused]. These denied that they were Christians now, or ever had been. They called upon the gods, and supplicated to your image, which I caused to be brought to me for that purpose, with frankincense and wine ; they also cursed Christ ; none of which things, it is said, can any of those that are really Christians be compelled to do : so I thought fit to let them go. Others of them that were named in the libel, said they were Christians, but presently denied it again ; that indeed they had been Christians, but had ceased to be so, some three years, some many more ; and one there was that said he had not been so these twenty years. All these wor- shiped your image and the images of our gods ; these also cursed Christ. However, they assured me that the main of their fault, or of their mistake, was this : That they were wont, on a stated day, to meet together before it was light, and to sing a hymn to Christ, as to a god, alternately ; and to oblige themselves by a sacrament [or oath] not to do GOVERNMENT OF TRAJAN. H9 i anything that was ill ; but that they would commit no theft, or pilfering, or adultery ; that they would not break their promises, or deny what was deposited with them, when it was required back again ; after which it was their custom to depart, and to meet again at a common but inno- cent meal, which they had left off upon that edict which I published at your command, and wherein I had forbidden any such conventicles. These examinations made me think it necessary to inquire by torments what the truth was ; which I did of two servant-maids, who were called "deaconesses;" but still I discovered no more than that they were addicted to a bad and to an extravagant superstition. Hereupon I have put off any further examinations, and have recourse to you ; for the affair seems to be well worth consultation, especially on account of the number of those "hat are in danger ; for there are many of every age, of every rank, and of both sexes, who are now and hereafter likely to be called to account, and to be in danger ; for this superstition is spread like a contagion, not only into cities and towns, but into country villages also, which yet there is reason to hope may be stopped and corrected. To be sure, the temples, which were almost forsaken, begin already to be frequented ; and the holy solemnities, which were long intermitted, begin to be revived. The sacrifices begin to sell well everywhere, of which very few purchasers had of late appeared ; whereby it is easy to suppose how great a multitude of men may be amended, if place for repentance be admitted." To this letter Trajan replied : " My Pliny : You have taken the method which you ought, in examin- ing the causes of those that had been accused as Christians ; for indeed no certain and general form of judging can be ordained in this case. These people are not to be sought for ; but if they be accused and convicted, they are to be punished : but with this caution, that he who denies him- self to be a Christian, and makes it plain that he is not so, by supplicat- ing to our gods, although he had been so formerly, lyay be allowed par- don, upon his repentance. As for libels sent without an author, they ought to have no place in any accusation whatsoever, for that would be a thing of very ill example, and not agreeable to my reign." 8 These are the facts in the case in regard to the persecu- tion by Trajan. As a matter of fact Trajan had little to do with it. Pliny found the laws being violated. As governor of a province, he took judicial and executive cognizance of 8 These two letters are found in English in Dissertation iii, at the close of Whiston's " Josephus." 120 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." it. In his enforcing of the laws there were questions raised which he submitted to the emperor for decision. The em- peror informed him that the proper course had been pur- sued. As a lover of justice, he directed that no regard should be paid to anonymous communications, but that all accusations should be made in due and legal form. He even goes so far as to limit to the regular form of judicial process the Christians' disregard of the law they were not to be sought after ; but when accused in regular form, if they refused to yield, they were to be punished. In all this it is easy to see the emperor, who was the representative of the law ; the just judge, refusing everything but the strictest conformity to the regular legal proceedings ; and the hu- mane man, willing rather to forego opportunity, than to hunt for occasion, to prosecute. It is difficult, therefore, to see how Trajan could fairly be charged with persecuting the Christians. Trajan died in A. D. 117, and was succeeded by HADRIAN. The fanatical populace being forbidden by Trajan's orders to proceed against the Christians in any but the legal way, had in many place's taken to raising riots and wreaking their vengeance upon the Christians in this disorderly way. In A. D. 124, Hadrian made a tour through the Eastern provinces. The proconsul of Asia Minor complained to him of these riot- ous proceedings. The emperor issued a rescript commanding that the Christians should not be harassed, nor should inform- ers be allowed to ply their trade in malicious prosecutions. If those who desired to prosecute the Christians could clearly prove their charges before the tribunal, "let them pursue this course only, but not by mere petitions and mere outcries against the Christians." "If any one bring an accusation and can show that they have done anything contrary to the laws," the magistrate was to judge of the matter " according to the heinousness of the crime ; " but if any one should un- ANTONINUS PIUS. RIOTOUS ATTACKS UPON THE CHRISTIANS. 121 dertake a prosecution of the Christians " with a view to slander," the matter was to be investigated "according to its criminality," and if it was found that the prosecution had been made on false accusation, the false accusers were to be severely punished. This rescript is as follows : " To Minucius Fundanus : I have received an epistle, written to me by the most illustrious Serenius Granianus, whom you have succeeded. I do not wish, therefore, that the matter should be passed by without examination, so that these men may neither be harassed, nor opportu- nity of malicious proceedings be offered to informers. If, therefore, the provincials can clearly evince their charges against the Christians, so as to answer before the tribunal, let them pursue this course only, but not by mere petitions, and mere outcries against the Christians. For it is far more proper, if any one would bring an accusation, that you should ex- amine it. If any one, therefore, bring an accusation, and can show that they have done anything contrary to the laws, determine it thus accord- ing to the heinousness of the crime. So that indeed, if any one should purpose this with a view to slander, investigate it according to its crimi- nality, and see to it that you inflict the punishment." 9 Hadrian's leniency was not from any respect to the Chris- tians as such, but from his- own native respect for justice and fairness. He died A. D. 138, and was succeeded by ANTONINUS PIUS. As soon as Hadrian's death was known, the restraints imposed by his edicts were cast off, and the sufferings of the Christians from popular tumult and riot were renewed. The bitterness of the popular clamor was deepened by serious disasters. Disastrous floods, earthquakes, and tires occurred about this time, all of which the superstitious pagans interpreted as the evidence of the anger of the gods poured upon the empire as punishment for the disrespect shown to the gods by the Christians, and which was so lightly dealt with by the imperial power. Antoninus, how- ever, being doubtless the mildest-mannered man that ever held the imperial power of Rome, renewed and rather ex- Euseblus's "Ecclesiastical History," book iv, chap. ix. 122 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." tended the protective edicts of Hadrian. Antoninus was succeeded in A. D. 161, by MARCUS AUKELIUS. Public calamities still continued. A terrible pestilence swept over the whole Roman empire from Ethiopia to Gaul, and the fury of the populace again fell severely upon the devoted Christians. Marcus Aurelius saw this matter in much the same light as the great mass of the people, and looked upon the pestilence that then raged, as a warning to restore the ancient religion in its minutest particulars. He summoned priests from all quarters to Rome, and even put off his expedition against the Marcomannians for the pur- pose of celebrating the religious solemnities, by which he hoped that the evil might be averted. He therefore sanc- tioned the popular rage against the Christians, and followed it up with an edict in which he commanded that search should he made for the Christians / and when brought to trial, they were to he forced hy tortures to deny the faith and do homage to the Roman gods. Marcus Aurelius died, March 17, A. D. ISO, and was succeeded Jby his son COMMODUS. This emperor, instead of being a persecutor of the Chris- tians, was rather a friend to them, if such a man could be counted the friend of anybody. Commodus, for the first three years of his reign, was a monster in vice, and after that a monster in cruelty as well as in vice. One evening in the third year of his reign, as he was returning from the amphitheater through the dark passage to the imperial palace, he was attacked by an assassin who felt so certain of accom- plishing his bloody purpose that with a drawn sword he ex- claimed, "The Senate sends you this." The attempt failed, however. The guards protected the emperor and captured the assassin. He confessed that his act was the culmination of a conspiracy which had originated with the emperor's sister Lucilla, who hoped to become empress by the death of F i I 9 CD GOVERNMENT OF COMMODUS. 123 Commodus. The conspirators were punished, Lucilla being first banished and afterwards put to death. But the words which the assassin had uttered "the Senate sends you this" still rung in the emperor's ears; and by it he was caused to think that the Senate was in some way connected with the attempt upon his life. The whole body of the Sen- ate became subject to his bitter and abiding enmity. But as he had nothing more tangible than suspicion to guide him, his course was necessarily uncertain, until a horde of inform- ers had arisen and turned his suspicions into facts. This event, however, was not long delayed ; because as soon as it was learned that the emperor desired to detect treason in the senators, the informers, whose trade had been abolished in the mild and just reign of Antoninus Pius, readily reappeared in numbers sufficient to satisfy the desire of the emperor. "Distinction of every kind soon became criminal. The possession of wealth stimulated the diligence of the informers ; rigid virtue implied a tacit censure of the jrregularities of Commodus ; important services implied a dangerous superiority of merit ; and the friendship of the father always insured the aversion of the son. Suspicion was equivalent to proof ; trial to condemnation. The exe- cution of a considerable senator was attended with the death of all who might lament or revenge his fate ; and when Commodus had once tasted human blood, he became incap- able of pity or remorse. . . . Every sentiment of virtue and humanity was extinct in the mind of Commodus. Whilst he thus abandoned the reins of .empire to these unworthy favorites, he valued nothing in sovereign power, except the unbounded license of indulging his sensual appetites. His hours were spent in a seraglio of three hundred beautiful women, and as many boys of every rank and of every prov- ince ; and wherever the arts of seduction proved ineffectual, the brutal lover had recourse to violence. . . . The intervals of lust were filled up with the basest, amusements." QMbon." 10 " Decline and Fall," chap, iv, par. 9, 16. 124: THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." Wild beasts were brought from far countries that the emperor might have the honor of slaying them with his own hand. The African lion, in his native haunts, men were for- bidden under heavy penalty to kill even in self-defense, that he might be reserved for the sport of the emperor. At last he entered the arena in the character of a gladiator, armed with a helmet, a sword, and a buckler, and obliged gladia- tors to fight with him. armed only with a net and a leaden trident. He thus fought (?) seven hundred and thirty-five times, and each contest meant the death of his antagonist. The list of senators sacrificed to his suspicions continued still to lengthen. His cruelty at last arrived at that pitch where nobody within his reach could feel secure for an hour ; and that they might certainly escape his furious caprice, Marcia his favorite concubine, Eclectus his cham- berlain, and Laetus his praetorian prefect, formed a conspir- acy to kill him. Marcia gave him a drink of poisoned wine, and the poison was assisted in its work by a professional wrestler who strangled him. Yet Coinmodus icas not a per- secutor of the Christians ; but with this exception, there were few people in all the empire whom he did not persecute. For some reason Marcia was friendly to the Christians, and her influence with Commodus, as well as his disposition to be as unlike his father as possible, inclined him to be favorable to them. SEPTIMIUS SEVEKUS, the fifth of the ' ' ten persecutors, " was emperor from A. D. 193 to 211. He was at first the friend of the Christians. There were Christians among the domestics of his house- hold. Both the nurse and the teacher of his son Caracalla were Christians, and "he always treated with peculiar dis- tinction several persons of both sexes who had embraced the new religion.' 1 ' Gibbon. 11 It must not be supposed, how- ever, that Severus himself was inclined to become a Chris- tian. Finding that the number of Christians was rapidly increasing, he issued an edict in A. D. 202 forbidding any- 11 Id., chap, xvi, par. 34. SEPTIMTUS SEVERUS. GOVERNMENT OF SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS. 125 body thereafter to adopt the new religion. This, however, did not prohibit those who were already Christians from remaining so. The purpose being to check the spread of the new religion, he forbade any further changing from the old to the new. Yet the result of the edict was indirectly to increase the hardships of the Christians under the already existing laws. This was the measure of the persecution ty Septimius Severus. But there is another side to the story of Severus which, when compared with this, shows that it is only by a severe stretch of language, if not of imagination, that the Christians could be counted as persecuted by him. It was through a triangular civil war that Septimius Severus secured the imperial power. He was commander of the troops on the Illyrian frontier, and was in Pannonia. Pescennius Niger was commander of the troops in Syria. Clodius Albinus was governor of Britain. The troops of Niger proclaimed him emperor ; and the troops of Severus did the same for him. Severus had the advantage of being nearest to Rome. He hastened into Italy with his army, and was acknowledged by the Senate as lawful emperor. War immediately followed between Severus and Niger. Niger was defeated in two engagements, and slain. As long as the contest with Niger was uncertain, Severus pre- tended the utmost friendship for Albinus ; bestowed upon him the title of Caesar ; sent him a letter in which he called him the brother of his soul and empire ; and charged the messengers who carried the letter that when they delivered it, they should secure a private audience with Albinus and assassinate him. Albinus, however, detected the conspiracy, and by it discovered that if he were to live, it would have to be as emperor. He crossed into Gaul ; the armies met at Lyons ; Albinus was defeated, captured, and beheaded. Severus discovered that the Senate had encouraged Albinus. He therefore sent to the Romans the head of Albinus with a letter declaring that none of the adherents of either Albinus 12 126 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." or Niger should be spared. He did, however, pardon thirty- five senators who were accused of having favored Albinus, while forty-one other senators with their wives, their children, and their friends were put to death. The same punishment was inflicted upon the most prominent characters of Spain, Gaul, and Syria, while many others were sent into exile, or suffered the confiscation of all their property, merely because they had obeyed the governor under whose authority they had happened to fall in the triangular conflict. Niger had been a popular governor, and many cities of the East con- tributed to him considerable sums of money when he was proclaimed emperor. All these cities were deprived of their honors, and were compelled to pay to Severus four times the amount that they had contributed to Niger. To elevate to the dignity of a persecution the treatment of the Christians by Septimius Severus in view of his treatment of the Roman Senate and whole cities and provinces of the empire, bears too much evidence of an attempt to make out a case, to be counted worthy of any weight. Severus was succeeded in A. D. 211, by his two sons, CARACALLA AND GETA. A little more than a year afterward, Caracalla murdered Geta in his mother's arms, who in the struggle to protect him, was wounded in the hand and covered with blood : and immediately following, ' ' under the vague appellation of the friends of Geta, above twenty thousand persons of both sexes suffered death." This, however, was but the begin- ning ; for " Caracalla was the common enemy of mankind." He left the city of Rome in A. D. 213, and spent the rest of his reign, about four years, in the several provinces of the empire, particularly those of the East, " and every province was by turn the scene of his rapine and cruelty." Gibbon The s'enators were compelled to accompany him wherever he went and to furnish daily entertainment at immense 12 Jd, chap, vi, par. 10, 13. MAXIMIN. GOVERNMENT Of CAR AC ALL A. expense, which he gave over to his soldiers. They were likewise required to build in every city where he would come, magnificent palaces and splendid theaters which he would either not visit at all or else visit and order at once to be torn down. The property of the most wealthy was confiscated at once, while that of the great mass of the people was taken under the form of taxes heavily increased. In the city of Alexandria in Egypt, simply because they had indulged in a bit of raillery at his expense, he took his station on top of the temple of Serapis, and commanded a general massacre of the citizens, which he directed and enjoyed from his ele- vated station. Thousands upon thousands of people were thus inhumanly slaughtered. And these are but parts of his wicked ways. Yet Caracalla is not numbered among the persecutors of the Christians, nor did he, in fact, molest the Christians as such. Yet it would be difficult to find an emperor, from Nero to Diocletian, who caused as much suffering to the Christians, as Caracalla did to almost every- body but the Christians. It would not be correct, however, to suppose that the Christians were exempt from his rav- ages : they of course shared the common lot in his desperate attentions. The next in the list of the "Ten Persecutors" is MAXIMIN. In the year 235 A. D., Maximin became emperor by the murder of the emperor Alexander Severus. Of him and the persecution of the Christians inflicted by him, the eccle- siastical historian says : "The emperor Alexander being carried off after a reign of thirteen years, was succeeded by Maximinus, who, inflamed with hatred against the house of Alexander, consisting of many believers, raised a persecu- tion, and commanded at first only the heads of the churches to be slain, as the abettors and agents of evangelical truth." JSusebius. 13 13 " Ecclesiastical History," book vi, chap, xxviii. 128 THE '-'TEN PERSECUTIONS." Alexander Severus had not only been a friend to the Christians, but had gone so far as to place an image of Christ among his household gods. The church in Rome had appropriated a piece of land in that city which was claimed by the Cooks' Union. A dispute arose about it, and the case was brought to the emperor for settlement. He decided in favor of the church, saying that it was better that God should be worshiped on that ground than that it should be given up to the cooks. Through such pronounced favor of the emperor, many Christians became connected with the imperial household, and bishops were received at court. When Maximin murdered the emperor Alexander, the Christians and the bishops to whom Eusebius refers were involved in the massacre. And this is the extent of Maxi- min's persecution of the Christians. Maximin was a barbarian who had risen from the condi- tion of a Thracian peasant to the highest military command. When he was in humble circumstances, he had been slighted by the Roman nobles, and treated with insolence by their slaves ; others had befriended him in his poverty, and had encouraged him in adversity. When he became emperor, he took vengeance on all alike, for all "were guilty of the same crime the knowledge of his original obscurity. For this crime many were put to death ; and by the execution of several of his benefactors, Maximin published, in characters of blood, the indelible history of his baseness and ingrati- tude." Gibbon. li Maximin was but little less than a wild beast in the shape of a man. Knowing full well his own shameful inferiority, he was supremely suspicious of every- body else. Being so treacherous and so cruel himself, he was ready to believe that every distinguished person was guilty of treason. ' ' Italy and the whole empire were in- fested with innumerable spies and informers." Magnus, a principal senator, was accused of conspiracy. ' ' Without a witness, without a trial, and without an opportunity of de- 14 " Decline and Fall," chap, vii, par. 8. DECIUS. PERSECUTION BT MAXIMIN. 129 fense, Magnus with four thousand of his supposed accom- plices, was put to death. . . . Confiscation, exile, or simple death were esteemed uncommon instances of his lenity. Some of the unfortunate sufferers he ordered to be sewed up in the hides of slaughtered animals, others to be exposed to wild beasts, others again to be beaten to death with clubs." Gttbon." Such was the conduct of Maximin toward the Roman no- bles. He next, at one single stroke, confiscated all the treas- ure and all the revenue of all the cities of the empire, and turned them to his own use. The temples everywhere were robbed of all the gold and silver offerings ; " and the statues of gods, heroes, and emperors were melted down, and coined into money." In many places these robberies and exactions were resisted, the people defending the rights of their cities and the sacredness of their temples. In such cases massacres accompanied the robbery of the temples and the confiscation of the cities' treasures. Of Maximin's treatment of the Christians, as of that of Domitian and Septimius Severus, it is but proper to remark that to separate this from all the other evidences of his cruelty, which were so wide-spread and continuous, magnify- ing this while ignoring all the rest in order to bestow upon it the distinction of a "persecution" bears too much evi- dence of an effort to make out a case, to be worthy of indorsement in any sober or exact history. The next one in the list of the ' ' Ten Persecutions " is that by the emperor DECIUS, whose reign was but a little more than two years in length, from A. D. 249-251. Decius was a man somewhat after the model of Trajan and Marcus Aurelius devoted to Rome, her laws, and her institutions. His serious endeavor was to bring back the Roman discipline, and the Roman virtue of earlier times. Therefore, one of the earliest acts of his reign 15 Id., par. 9, 10. 130 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." was to revive the office of censor. The choosing of the censor was left to the Senate, and as the result, Valerian was unanimously chosen. The speech which Decius made upon the investiture of Yalerian with the insignia of his office, will enable the reader to form some estimate of the ideal which this emperor had formed for himself in the matter of gov- ernment. He said : "Happy Valerian, happy in the general approbation of the Senate and of the Roman republic ! Accept the censorship of mankind : and judge of our manners. You will select those who deserve to continue members of the Senate ; you will restore the equestrian order to its ancient splendor ; you will improve the revenue, yet moderate the public burdens. You will distinguish into regular classes the various and infinite multitude of citizens ; and accurately review the military strength, the wealth, the virtue, and the resources of Rome. Your decisions shall obtain the force of laws. The army, the palace, the ministers of justice, and the great officers of the empire, are all subject to your tribunal. None are exempted excepting only the ordinary consuls, the prefect of the city, the king of the sacrifices, and (as long as she preserves her chastity inviolate) the eldest of the vestal virgins. Even these few, who may not dread the severity, will anxiously solicit the esteem of the Roman censor." 16 With such views of the public needs and of his duty as emperor to restore the purity of the old Roman discipline, it could only be that the effects of his efforts would be first felt by the Christians, because by their denial of the gods and repudiation of the Roman religion and their denial of the right of the State to interfere with their religious exer- cise or profession, they were placed as the first of the ene- mies of the Roman people. In the year 250 the persecution began. Rigorous search was ordered for all the people who were suspected of refusing to conform to the Roman wor- ship, with the object of compelling them to return to the exercise of the ceremonies of the Roman religion. When they were found, if they refused, threats were first to be used, and if that failed, torture was to be applied, and if that failed, death was to be inflicted. 16 Id., chap, x, par. 14. THE PERSECUTION BT DECIUS. 131 The persecution began in Rome, and as there had been a long period of peace, many of the professed Christians had become worldly, and thought more of increasing their earthly possessions than of cultivating the Christian virtues. Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage, who lived at the time and was put to death only a few years afterward, says : "Forgetful of what believers had either done before in the times of the apostles, or always ought to do, they, with the insatiable ardor of covetousness, devoted themselves to the increase of their property." l7 Immediately upon the issuing of this edict, large num- bers of these gave up their profession, whose ready compli- ance encouraged the emperor to suppose that it would be but an easy task entirely to suppress the Christian faith. Bishops themselves had set the people an example in worldly degeneracy, for says Cyprian of them : "Among the priests there was no devotedness of religion ; among the ministers there was no sound faith : in their works there was no mercy ; in their manners their was no discipline. In men, their beards were defaced ; in women, their complexion was dyed : the eyes were falsified from what God's hand had made them ; their hair was stained with a falsehood. Crafty frauds were used to deceive the hearts of the simple, subtle meanings for circumventing the brethren. They united in the bond of marriage with unbelievers ; they prostituted the members of Christ to the Gentiles. They would swear not only rashly, but even more, would swear falsely ; would despise those set over them with haughty swelling, would speak evil of one another with envenomed tongue, would quarrel with one another with obstinate hatred. Not a few bishops who ought to furnish both exhortation and example to others, despising their divine charge, became agents in secular business, forsook their throne, deserted their people, wandered about over foreign provinces, hunted the markets for gainful merchandise, while brethren were starving in the church. They sought to possess money in hoards, they seized estates by crafty deceits, they increased their gains by mul- tiplying usuries." Cyprian. 16 Seeing, then, that so many of the people had so readily renounced their profession, and believing that the influence 17 "Ante-Nicene Fathers," Treatises of Cyprian, " On the Lapsed," chap. vi. IS Id. 132 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." of the bishops was to a large extent the cause of the exist- ence and spread of Christianity, and seeing the character of many of them thus displayed, the efforts of Decius were first directed at these with the hope that if their influence was checked, it would be easy to restore the Roman worship. But it could not be made to succeed. If a bishop was im- prisoned or banished, it only bound his flock closer to him ; if he was put to death, by his example others were only en- couraged to be the more faithful to their profession ; and thus, although the persecution began with the bishops, it soon embraced the people ; and although it had its begin- ning in Rome, it soon extended throughout the empire. Thus began the first imperial persecution that there had been in the city of Rome since that of Nero, and the first one which really spread over the whole empire. Wherever the edict was published, the idea was always by mild meas- ures first, if possible, to restore the Roman worship every- where ; and it was only when the milder measures failed, that the severer were employed, even to death. Being so wide-spread, the Decian persecution was thus the severest that had ever yet been inflicted upon the Christians by any emperor ; yet it continued only about two years, for the emperor lost his life in a battle with the Goths in December, 251. The author of the next of the "Ten Persecutions" was VALERIAN, who became emperor in August, 253. At first he was fav- orable to the Christians. Indeed, Dionysius, as quoted by Eusebius, says that "never was there any of the emperors before him so favorably and benevolently disposed toward them;" that, "in the commencement of his reign" he ' ' plainly received them with excessive civility and friend- ship ;" and that the emperor's house "was filled with pious persons, and was, indeed, a congregation of the Lord." 1 ' 19 Eusebius's "Ecclesiastical History," book vii, chap. x. GALLIENUS. CHRISTIANITY LEGALIZED. 133 This is probably somewhat extravagant, but that the em- peror was friendly to the Christians at the beginning of his reign, is very evident. This leniency continued till the year 257, when his con- duct toward them was reversed ; but, like Decius, he hoped to put an end to Christianity without the employment of violent measures. He endeavored first to compel the church leaders, the bishops, the presbyters, and the deacons, to renounce Christianity, expecting that the people would fol- low their example. This failing, he next forbade their hold- ing meetings ; likewise failing in this, an edict was issued in 258 commanding them to be put to death at once. The sen- ators and knights who were Christians, were to be deprived of their rank and property, and if they still persevered, they were to be beheaded. Women of rank who were Christians, were to be deprived of their property and banished. Sixtus, the Roman bishop, and four deacons of the church in Rome were put to death under this edict in August. This persecu- tion came to an end in 260, when Valerian was taken pris- oner by the king of Persia. He was succeeded in the em- pire by his son GALLIENTTS, who not only immediately put a stop to the persecution, but issued an edict which in effect recognized Christianity as among the lawful religions of the Roman empire, by com- manding that the church property should be restored ; for none but legally existing bodies could legally hold common property. Yet this man who showed himself to be such a friend to the Christians as to make their religion legal, was very little behind Maximin in his cruelty to every one but the Chris- tians. During his reign there arose nineteen usurpers in different parts of the empire, of whom there was not one "who enjoyed a life of peace or died a natural death." Gal- lienus was so fortunate as to be successful over them all, yet their efforts kept the empire in a state of constant ferment, 134 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." and the disposition of Gallienus toward all may be gathered from a command that he issued with respect to one Inge- nuus, who assumed the office of emperor in the province of Illyricum. When the revolt had been quelled, Gallienus wrote to his minister there these words : "It is not enough that you exterminate such as have appeared in arms : the chance of battle might have served me as effectually. Tke male sex of every age must be extirpated ; provided that, in the execu- tion of the children and old men, you can contrive means to save our reputation. Let every one die who has dropped an expression, who has entertained a thought, against me, against me the son of Valerian, the father and brother of so many princes. Remember that Ingenuus was made emperor : tear, kill, hew in pieces. I write to you with my own hand, and would inspire you with my own feelings." Gibbon. 20 This being a sample of things in nineteen different parts of the empire, it will be seen that under Gallienus as under some of the others whom we have named, although the Christians were unmolested, they were about the only people in the empire who were so. The next one in the list of the ten persecutors is AUEELIAN, who became emperor in A. D. 2TO. His persecution, like that of some of the others in the list, is a myth. So far from Aurelian's being a persecutor or an enemy of the Christians, or one whom they dreaded, the bishops them- selves appealed to him in one of their intestine contro- versies. Paul of Samosata was Bishop of Antioch, and like many other bishops of his day, he assumed a style and an arro- gance becoming an emperor of Rome rather than a servant of Christ. He was accused of heresy and tried by a council of bishops, who pronounced him deposed, and named another to be seated in his place. But, although they could easily enough pronounce him deposed, it was another thing to unseat him in fact. Paul held his bishopric in spite of 20 " Decline and Fall," chap, x, par. 50. 13 AUKELIAN. THE TEN PERSECUTIONS A FABLE. 135 them. The council then appealed to Aurelian to enforce their decree and compel Paul to vacate the bishopric. Aurelian refused to decide the question himself, but referred them to the Bishop of Rome, saying that whoever the bish- ops of Rome and Italy should decide to be the proper per- son, should have the office. They decided against Paul, and Aurelian compelled him to relinquish his seat. After- ward, however, in the last year of his reign, as it proved to be, Eusebius says that Aurelian was persuaded to raise per- secution against the Christians, and the rumor was spread abroad everywhere ; yet before any decree was issued, death overtook him. This is the history of Aurelian as one of the ''Persecutors," and this is the history of "the ninth perse- cution." The tenth persecution, that of Diocletian, was a persecu- tion indeed. We shall not dwell upon it here, because it will have to be noticed fully in another place. The evidence here presented, however, is sufficient to show that the story of the Ten Persecutions is a fable. That both events and names have been forced into service to make up the list of ten persecutions and to find among the Roman emperors ten persecutors, the history plainly shows. The history shows that only five of the so-called ten persecutors can by any fair construction be counted such. These five were Nero, Marcus Aurelius, Valerian, Decius, and Diocletian. Of the other five Trajan not only added nothing to the laws already existing, but gave very mild di- rections for the enforcement of these, which abated rather than intensified the troubles of the Christians. It would be difficult to see how any directions could have been more mild without abrogating the laws altogether, which to Trajan would liave been only equivalent to subverting the empire itself. Domitian was not a persecutor of the Christians as such, but was cruel to all people ; and in common with others, some Christians suffered, and suffered only as did others who were not Christians. Septimius Severus only forbade any 136 THE "TEN PERSECUTIONS." more people to become Christians without particularly inter- fering with such as were already Christians. The cruelty of Maximin, more bitter even than that of Domitian, involved all classes, and where it overtook Christians, that which befell them was but the common lot of thousands and thou- sands of people who were not Christians. Aurelian was not in any sense a persecutor of the Christians in fact. At the utmost stretch, he only contemplated it. Had he lived longer, he might have been a persecutor ; but it is not honest to count a man a persecutor who at the most only intended to persecute. It is not fair in such a case to turn an intention into a fact. Looking again at the record of the five who really were persecutors, it is found that from Nero to Marcus Aurelius was ninety-three years ; that from Marcus Aurelius to Decius was eighty years ; that from Decius to Valerian's edict was six years ; and that from the edict of Gallienus to Diocletian's edict of persecution was forty-three years. From the record of this period, on the other hand, it is found that between Nero and Marcus Aurelius, Domitian and Yitellius raged ; that between Marcus and Decius, the savage Commodus and Caracalla, and Elagabalus and Maximin, all ravaged the em- pire like wild boars a forest ; and that next after Valerian came Gallienus. From these facts it must be admitted that if the persecu- tion of the Christians by Pagan Rome depended upon the action of the emperors, and if it is to be attributed to them, Christians had not much more to bear than had the generality of people throughout the empire. In short, the story of the " Ten Persecutions" is a myth. CHAPTER V. CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. A LTHOUGH the tale of the "Ten Persecutions" is a I\ myth, this is not by any means to pronounce as myths all stories of the persecution of Christians by Pagan Rome. Though there were not ten persecutions as such, there was one continuous persecution, only with variations, for two hundred and fifty years. Nor is it strictly correct to speak of this as the persecu- tion of Christians by the Romans. It was all this, it is true, but it was much more. The controversy between the Christians and the Romans was not a dispute between indi- viduals, or a contention between sects or parties. It was a contest between antagonistic principles. It was, therefore, a contest between Christianity and Rome, rather than be- tween Christians and Romans. On the part of Christianity it was the proclamation of the principle of genuine liberty ; on the part of Rome it was the assertion of the principle of genuine despotism. On the part of Christianity it was the assertion of the principle of the rights of conscience and of the individual ; on the part of Rome it was the assertion of the principle of the absolute absorption of the individual, and. his total enslavement to the State in all things, divine as well as human, religious as well as civil. This is detected by a mere glance again at the actions of the emperors whom we have named in the previous chapter. With the exception of Nero, the emperors who persecuted the Christians most, were among the best that Rome ever [137] 138 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. had ; while those emperors who were the very worst, perse- cuted the Christians, as such, the least or not at all. Mar- cus Aurelius, indeed, is acknowledged not only to have been one of the best of the Roman emperors, but one of the best men of all pagan times ; while on the other hand, Doinitian, and Vitellius, and Cornmodus, and Caracalla, and Elagabalus, and Maximin, were not only the worst of Roman emperors, but among the worst of all men. While on the part of those emperors who persecuted the Christians it was not cruelty that caused them to do so ; on the part of the others named who did not persecute the Christians as such, but who persecuted everybody indiscriminately, it was nothing but cruelty that caused them to do so. With the exception of Nero, it was invariably the best of the emper- ors who persecuted the Christians ; and they invariably did it, not because they were cruel and delighted to see peo- ple suffer, but only by the enforcement of the laws which were already extant ; by way of respect to institutions long established ; and to preserve a system the fall of which, to them, meant the fall of the empire itself. The best men naturally cared most for the Roman insti- tutions and held as most sacred the majesty of Rome and the dignity of Roman law as the expression of that majesty. Being thus the most jealous of the Roman integrity and Roman institutions, any disregard of the majesty of Rome, or any infraction of the laws, would not be suffered by them to go unnoticed. Christians, caring nothing for the maj- esty of Rome in view of the awful majesty of Jesus Christ, not only disregarded the Roman laws on the subject of re- ligion, but asserted the right to disregard them ; and held it to be the most sacred and heaven-enjoined duty to spread abroad these views to all people. Consequently, in the very nature of things, these would be the first ones to incur the displeasure of those emperors who held sacred the Roman institutions. On the other hand, those emperors who cared little or nothing for anything but the gratification of their pREEbOM IN JESUS CHRIST. 139 appetites and passions, and the indulgence of their cruel propensities, cared little or nothing whether the Christians obeyed the laws or not. They themselves cared nothing for the laws, the manners, or the institutions of Rome, and they cared little whether other people cared for these things or not. Jesus Christ came into the world to set men free, and to plant in their souls the genuine principle of liberty, liberty actuated by love, liberty too honorable to allow itself to be used as an occasion to the flesh, or for a cloak of maliciousness, liberty led by a conscience enlightened by the Spirit of God, liberty in which man may be free from all men, yet made so gentle by love that he would willingly become the servant of all, in order to bring them to the enjoyment of this same liberty. This is freedom indeed. This is the freedom which Christ gave to man ; for, whom the Son makes free is free indeed. In giving to men this freedom, such an infinite gift could have no other result than that which Christ intended ; namely, to bind them in everlasting, unquestioning, unswerving allegiance to him as the royal benefactor of the race. He thus reveals himself to men as the highest good, and brings them to himself as the manifestation of that highest good, and to obedience to his will as the perfection of conduct. Jesus Christ was God manifest in the flesh. Thus God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself, that they might know him, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom he sent. He gathered to himself disciples, instructed them in his heavenly doctrine, endued them with power from on high, sent them forth into all the world to preach this gospel of freedom to every creature, and to teach them to observe all things whatsoever he had commanded them. The Roman empire then filled the world, "the sublim- est incarnation of power, and a monument the mightiest of greatness built by human hands, which has upon this planet been suffered to appear." That empire, proud of its con- 140 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. quests, and exceedingly jealous of its claims, asserted its right to rule in all things, human and divine. In the Roman view, the State took precedence of everything. It was entirely out of respect to the State and wholly to pre- serve the State, that either the emperors or the laws ever forbade the exercise of the Christian religion. According to Roman principles, the State was the highest idea of good. " The idea of the State was the highest idea of ethics ; and within that was included all actual realization of the highest good ; hence the development of all other goods pertaining to humanity, was made dependent on this." JVeander. 1 Man with all that he had was subordinated to the State ; he must have no higher aim than to be a servant of the State ; he must seek no higher good than that which the State could bestow. Thus every Roman citizen was a subject, and every Roman subject was a slave. " The more distinguished a Roman became, the less was he a free man. The omnipo- tence of the law, the despotism of the rule, drove him into a narrow circle of thought and action, and his credit and influence depended on the sad austerity of his life. The whole duty of man, with the humblest and greatest of the Romans, was to keep his house in order, and be the obedient servant of the State." Jlommsen. 2 It will be seen at once that for any man to profess the principles and the name of Christ, was virtually to set him- self against the Roman empire ; for him to recognize God as revealed in Jesus Christ as the highest good, was but treason against the Roman State. It was not looked upon by Rome as anything else than high treason ; because as the Roman State represented to the Roman the highest idea of lu History of the Christian Religion ind Church," vol. i, part i, Section First, dlv. 3, par. 1. 2 Quoted by James Freeman Clarke in "Ten Great Religions," chap, viii, sec. iv, par. 1. He does not cite the place where Mommsen says it. I have noted quite carefully Mommsen's " History of Rome," and have not found it. The substance of it is there, in book iii, chap, xiii, par. 1, but this quotation itself is not there. It must have been taken from some other of Mommsen's. works. PAGAN IDEA OF THE STATE. good, for any man to assert that there was a higher good, was to make Rome itself subordinate. And this would not be looked upon in any other light by Roman pride than as a direct blow at the dignity of Rome, and subversive of the Ro- man State. Consequently the Christians were not only called "atheists," because they denied the gods, but the accusation against them before the tribunals was of the crime of " high treason," because they denied the right of the State to inter- fere with men's relations to God. The common accusation against them was that they were "irreverent to the Caesars, and enemies of the Caesars and of the Roman people. " To the Christian, the word of God asserted with abso- lute authority: "Fear God, and keep his commandments; for this is the whole duty of man." Eccl. xii, 13. To him, obedience to this word through faith in Christ, was eternal life. This to him was the conduct which showed his alle- giance to God as the highest good, a good as much higher than that of the Roman State % as the government of God is greater than was the government of Rome. This idea of the State, was not merely the State as a civil institution, but as a divine institution, and the highest conception of divinity itself. The genius of Rome was the supreme deity. Thus the idea of the State as the highest good was the religious idea, and consequently religion was inseparable from the State. All religious views were to be held subordinate to the State, and all religion was only the servant of the State. The Roman State being the chief deity, the gods of Rome derived their dignity from the State rather than the State deriving any honor from them. And the genius of the Roman State being to the Roman mind the chief deity, as Rome had conquered all nations, it was demon- strated to the Roman mind that Rome was superior to all the gods that were known. And though Rome allowed conquered nations to maintain the worship of their national gods, these as well as the conquered people were considered 142 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. only as servants of the Roman State. Every religion was held subordinate to the religion of Rome, and though ' ' all forms of religion might come to Rome and take their places in its pantheon, they must come as the servants of the State." . The State being the Roman's conception of the highest good, Rome's own gods derived all their dignity from, the fact that they were recognized as such by the State. It was counted by the Romans an act of the greatest condescension and an evidence of the greatest possible favor to bestow State recognition upon any foreign gods, or to allow any Roman subject to worship any other gods than those which were recognized as such by the Roman State. A funda- mental maxim of Roman legislation was, " No man shall have for himself particular gods of his own ; no man shall worship by himself any new or foreign gods, unless they are recog- nized by the public laws." Cicero. 3 Again : the Roman State being the supreme deity, the Senate and people were but the organs through which its ideas were expressed ; hence the maxirn, Vox populi, vox dei, the voice of the people is the voice of god. As this voice gave expression to the will of the supreme deity, and consequently of the highest good ; and as this will was ex- pressed in the form of laws; hence again the Roman maxim, " What the law says is right." It is very evident that in such a system there was no place for individuality. The State was everything, and the majority was in fact the State. What the majority said should be, that was the voice of the State, that was the voice of God, that was the expression of the highest good, that was the expression of the highest conception of right ; and everybody must assent to that or be considered a traitor to the State. The individual was but a part of the State. 3 (Rioted in Neander's " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Section First, div. 3, par. 2. ARCH OF AUGUSTUS. RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE. .143 There was therefore no such thing as the rights of the people ; the right of the State only was to be considered, and' that was to be considered absolute. "The first principle of their law was the paramount right of the State over the citizen. Whether as head of a family, or as proprietor, he had no natural rights of his own ; his privileges were created by the law as well as defined by it. The State in the plenitude of her power, delegated a portion of her own irresponsibility to the citizen, who satisfied the conditions she required, in order to become the parent of her children ; but at the same time she demanded of him the sacrifice of his free agency to her own rude ideas of political expediency." MerivaleS It is also evident that in such a system, there was no such thing as the rights of conscience ; because as the State was supreme also in the realm of religion, all things relig- ious were to be subordinated to the will of the State, which was but the will of the majority. And where the majority presumes to decide in matters of religion, there is no such thing as rights of religion or conscience. Against this whole system Christianity was diametrically opposed, First, In its assertion of the supremacy of God ; in the idea of God as manifested in Jesus Christ as the highest idea of good ; in the will of God as expressed in his law as the highest conception of right ; and in the fear of God and the keeping of his commandments as the whole duty of man. Christ had set himself before his disciples as the one possessing all power in heaven and in earth. He had told them to go into all the world and teach to every creature all things whatsoever he had commanded them. Christ had said that the first of all the commandments, that which inculcates the highest and first of all duties, is "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength." This put Jesus Christ above the State, and put allegiance to him above allegiance to the State ; this denied the suprem- 4 " Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxii, par. 21. 14:4: CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN UMPIRE. acy of Rome, and likewise denied that either the Roman gods were gods at all, or that the genius of Rome itself was in any sense a god. Secondly, When the republic as represented by the Sen- ate and people of Rome was merged in the imperial power, and the emperor became the embodiment of the State, he represented the dignity, the majesty, and the power of the State, and likewise, in that, represented the divinity of the State. Hence divinity attached to the Caesars. Christianity was directly opposed to this, as shown by the word of Christ, who, when asked by the Pharisees and the Herodians whether it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar or not, answered: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's ; and unto God the things that are God's." In this Christ established a clear distinction between Caesar and God, and between religion and the State. He separated that which pertains to God from that which per- tains to the State. Only that which was Caesar's was to be rendered to Caesar, while that which is God's was to be rendered to God and with no reference whatever to Caesar. The State being divine and the Caesar reflecting this di- vinity, whatever was God's was Caesar's. Therefore when Christ made this distinction between God and Caesar, sep- arated that which pertains to God from that which per- tains to Caesar, and commanded men to render to God that which is God's, and to Caesar only that which is Caesar's, he at once stripped Caesar the State of every attribute of divinity. And in doing this he declared the supremacy of the individual conscience / because it is left with the individ- ual to decide what things they are which pertain to God. Thus Christianity proclaimed the right of the individual to worship according to the dictates of his own conscience, while Rome asserted the duty of every man to worship ac- cording to the dictates of the State. Christianity asserted the supremacy of God ; Rome asserted the supremacy of the State. Christianity set forth God as manifested in Jesus CHRISTIANS SUBJECT TO CIVIL AUTHORITY. 145 Christ as the chief good ; Rome held the State to be the highest good. Christianity set forth the law of God as the expression of the highest conception of right ; Rome held the law of the State to be the expression of the highest idea of right. Christianity taught that the fear of God and the keeping of his commandments is the whole duty of man ; Rome taught that to be the obedient servant of the State is the whole duty of man. Christianity preached Christ as the sole possessor of power in heaven and in earth ; Rome as- serted the State to be the highest power. Christianity sep- arated that which is God's from that which is Caesar's ; Rome maintained that that which is God's is Caesar's. This was the contest, and these were the reasons of it, between Christianity and the Roman empire. Yet in all this Christianity did not deny to Caesar a place ; it did not propose to undo the State. It only taught the State its proper place ; and proposed to have the State take that place and keep it. Christianity did not dispute the right of the Roman State to be ; it only denied the right of that State to be in the place of God. In the very words in which he separated between that which is Caesar's and that which is God's, Christ recognized the rightfulness of Caesar to be ; and that there were things that rightfully belong to Caesar, and which were to be rendered to him by Christians. He said, "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's." In these words he certainly recognized that Caesar had jurisdiction in certain things, and that within that jurisdiction he was to be respected. As Caesar repre- sented the State, in this scripture the phrase represents the State, whether it be the State of Rome or any other State on earth. This is simply the statement of the right of civil government to be ; that there are certain things over which civil government has jurisdiction ; and that in these things the authority of civil government is to be respected. This jurisdiction is more clearly defined in Paul's letter to the Romans, chap, xiii, 1-10. There it is commanded, " Let 146 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. every soul be subject unto the higher powers." In this is asserted the right of the higher powers that is, the right of the State to exercise authority, and that Christians must be subject to that authority. Further it is given as a reason for this, that "there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God." This not only asserts the right of the State to be and to exercise authority, but it also asserts the truth that the State is an ordinance of God, and the power which it exercises is ordained of God. Yet in this very assertion Christianity was held to be antagonistic to Rome, because it put the God of the Christians above the Roman State, and made the State to be only an ordinance of the God of the Christians. For the Roman empire, or for any of the Roman emperors, to have recognized the truth of this statement would have been at once to revolutionize the whole system of civil and religious economy of the Romans, and to deny at once the value of the accumulated wisdom of all the generations of the Roman ages. Yet that was the only proper alternative of the Roman State, and that is what ought to have been done. Civil government being thus declared to be of God, and its authority ordained of God, the instruction proceeds : " Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the or- dinance of God : and they that resist shall receive to them- selves damnation. . . . Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake." Govern- ments being of God, and their authority being ordained of God, Christians in respecting God will necessarily respect in its place, the exercise of the authority ordained by him ; Imt this authority, according to the words of Christ, is to be exercised only in those things which are . Caesar's and not in things which pertain to God. Accordingly, the letter to the Romans proceeds, "For this cause pay ye tribute also ; for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing." This connects Paul's argument directly with that of Christ above referred to, and shows that this is but a THE LIMITS OF STATE JURISDICTION. 147 comment on that statement, and an extension of the argu- ment therein contained. The scripture proceeds: "Render therefore to all their dues : tribute to whom tribute is due ; custom to whom cus- tom ; fear to whom fear ; honor to whom honor. Owe no man anything, but to love one another ; for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet ; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly com- prehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." Let it be borne in mind that the apostle is here writing to Christians concerning the respect and duty which they are to render to the powers that be, that is, to the State in fact. He knew full well, and so did those to whom he wrote, that there are other commandments in the very law of which a part is here quoted. But he and they likewise knew that these other commandments do not in any way relate to any man's duty or respect to the powers that be. Those other commandments of the law which is here p.artly quoted, re- late to God and to man's duty to him. One of them is, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me;" another, "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image," etc.; another, "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain ;" and another, "Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy ; six days shalt thou labor and do all thy work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy 'God," etc.: and these are briefly comprehended in that say- ing, namely, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength." According to the words of Christ, all these obligations, pertaining solely to God, are to be rendered to him only, and with man in this realm, Caesar can never of right have anything to do in any way what- ever. 14 148 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. As, therefore, the instruction in Romans xiii, 1-10 is given to Christians concerning their duty and respect to the powers that be ; and as this instruction is confined abso- lutely to man's relationship to his fellow-men, it is evident that when Christians have paid their taxes, and have shown proper respect to their fellow-men, then their obligation, their duty, arid their respect, to the powers that le, have been fully discharged, and those powers never can rightly have any further jurisdiction over their conduct. This is not to say that the State has jurisdiction of the last six command- ments as such. It is only to say that the jurisdiction of the State is confined solely to man's conduct toward man, and never can touch his relationship to God, even under the sec- ond table of the law. This will be more fully discussed in a subsequent chapter. This doctrine asserts the right of every man to worship according to the dictates of his own conscience, as he pleases, and when he pleases. Just this, however, was the subject of the whole controversy between Christianity and the Ro- man empire. There was never any honest charge made that the Christians did violence to any man, or refused to pay tribute. The direct and positive instruction was not only that they should do no evil, but that they should speak no evil of any man ; and that they practiced accordingly is shown by Pliny's letter to Trajan concerning the Christians, in which he says that when they met and partook of that harmless meal, before they separated they pledged one another not to steal, not to commit adultery, not to do vio- lence to any man. The Roman State never had any just charge to bring against the Christians in any of these re- spects. The charge was atheism, because they denied the gods, and high treason, because they denied the right of the State to rule in things pertaining to God. Therefore as a mat- ter of fact the whole controversy between Christianity and the Roman empire was upon the simple question of the rights of conscience, the question whether it is the right of every THE ROMAN RELIGION. 149 man to worship according to the dictates of his own con- science, or whether it is his duty to worship according to the dictates of the State. This question was then as it always has been, very far- reaching. When the right was claimed to worship accord- ing to the dictates of conscience, in that was claimed the right to disregard all the Roman laws on the subject of religion, and to deny the right of the State to have anything whatever to do with the question of religion. But this, according to the Roman estimate, was only to bid defiance to the State and to the interests of society altogether. The Roman State, so intimately and intricately connected with religion, was but the reflection of the character of the Roman people, who prided themselves upon being the most religious of all nations, and Cicero commended them for this, because their religion was carried into all the details of life. "The Roman ceremonial worship was very elaborate and minute, applying to every part of daily life. It consisted in sacri- fices, prayers, festivals, and the investigations, by auguries and haruspices, of the will of the gods and the course of future events. The Romans accounted themselves an ex- ceedingly religious people, because their religion was so intimately connected with the affairs of home and State. . . . Thus religion everywhere met the public life of the Roman by its festivals, and laid an equal yoke on his private life by its requisition of sacrifices, prayers, and auguries. All pursuits must be conducted according to a system care- fully laid down by the College of Pontiffs. ... If a man went out to walk, there was a form to be recited ; if he mounted his chariot, another." James Freeman Clarke. 6 But this whole system of religion was false. The gods which they worshiped were false gods. Their gods, in short, were but reflections of themselves, and the ceremonies of worship were but the exercise of their own passions and lusts. Neither in their gods nor their worship was there a single element of good. Therefore upon it all Christianity 6 " Ten Great Religions," chap, vii, sec. iii, par. 1, 4. 150 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. taught the people to turn their backs. The Christian doc- trine declared all these gods to be no gods, and all the forms of worship of the gods to be only idolatry, and a denial of the only true God the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. The games and all the festival days were affairs of state, and ' ' were an essential part of the cheerful devotion of the pagans, and the gods were supposed to accept, as the most grateful offering, the games that the prince and people celebrated in honor of their peculiar festivals." Gibbon* The festivities of the wedding and the ceremonies of the funeral were all conducted under the protection of the gods. More than this, ' ' the number of the gods was as great as the number of the incidents in earthly life." Mommsen." 1 The "pagan's domestic hearth was guarded by the penates, or by the ancestral gods of his family or tribe. By land he traveled under the protection of one tutelar divinity, by sea of another ; the birth, the bridal, the funeral, had each its presiding deity ; the very commonest household utensils and implements were cast in mythological forms ; he could scarcely drink without being reminded of mak- ing a libation to the gods." Milman* All this heathen ceremony Christianity taught the people to renounce, and every one did renounce it who became a Christian. But so intricately was the idolatry interwoven into all the associa- tions of both public and private life, of both State and social action, that "it seemed impossible to escape the observance of them without at the same time renouncing the commerce of mankind and all the offices and amusements of society." Yet with any of it true Christianity did not compromise. Every Christian, merely by the profession of Christianity, severed himself from all the gods of Rome and everything 6 " Decline and Fall," chap, xv, par. 15. 7 " History of Rome," book i, chap, xii, par. 22. 8 " History of Christianity," book ii, chaf. Ill, par. 2. THE ROMAN LAWS. 151 that was done in their honor. He could not attend a wed- ding or a funeral of his nearest relatives, because every cere- mony was performed with reference to the gods. He could not attend the public festival, for the same reason. Nor could he escape by absenting himself on such occasions, because on days of public festivity, the doors of the houses, and the lamps about them, and the heads of the dwellers therein, must all be adorned with laurel and garlands of flowers in honor of the licentious gods and goddesses of Rome. If the Christian took part in these services, he paid honor to the gods as did the other heathen. If he refused to do so, which he must do if he would obey God and honor Christ, he made himself conspicuous before the eyes of the people, all of whom were intensely jealous of the respect they thought due to the gods ; and also in so refusing the Christians disobeyed the Roman law which commanded these things to be done. All this subjected the Christian to universal hatred, and as the laws positively forbade everything that the Christians taught both with reference to the gods and to the State, the forms of law furnished a ready channel through which this hatred found vent. This was the open way for the fury of the populace to spend itself upon the " deniers of the gods, and enemies of the Csesars and of the Roman people ; " and this was the source of the persecution of Christianity by pagan Rome. Before Christ was born into the world, Maecenas, one of the two chief ministers of Augustus, had given to that first of Roman emperors the following counsel, as embodying the principle which should characterize the imperial govern- ment : "Worship the gods in all respects according to the laws of your country, and compel all others to do the same ; but hate and punish those who would introduce anything whatever, alien to our customs in this particular ; not alone for the sake of the gods, because whoever de- 152 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. spises them is incapable of reveren'ce for anything else ; but because such persons, by introducing new divinities, mislead many to adopt also foreign laws. " 9 The Christians did refuse to worship the gods according to the laws, or in any other, way ; they did introduce that which was pre-eminently alien to all the Roman customs in this particular ; they did despise the gods. In the presence of the purity, the goodness, and the inherent holiness of Jesus Christ, the Christians could have no other feeling than that of abhorrence for the wicked, cruel, and licentious gods of the heathen. And when from love for Christ they shrank in abhorrence from this idolatry, it only excited to bitter hatred the lovers of the licentious worship of the in- sensate gods ; and, as above stated, there was the law, and there the machinery of the State, ready to be used in giving force to the religious enmity thus excited. One of the ruling principles of law in the Roman State was this : "Whoever introduces new religions, the tendency and character of which are unknown, whereby the minds of men may be disturbed, shall, if belonging to the higher rank, be banished ; if to the lower, punished with death." 10 Nothing could be more directly condemned by this law than was Christianity. 1. It was wholly a new religion, one never before heard of ; it was not in any sense a national religion, but was ever announced as that which should be universal. Being so entirely new, in the nature of the case its tendency and character were unknown to the Roman mind. 2. Of all religions the world has ever known, Christianity appeals most directly to the minds of men. The first of all the commandments demanding the obedience of men de- 9 Neander's " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. i, Section First, part i, div. iii, par. 2. 10 Id. SOURCES OF PERSECUTION. 153 clares, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy mind." The law of God was set forth as the highest conception of right, and the letter to all the Christians in Rome said, "With the mind I myself serve the law of God." Rom. vii, 25. Again that same letter said, "Be not conformed to this world: but be ye trans- formed Jy the renewing of your mind." Chap, xii, 2. Again and again in the Christian writings this same idea was set forth, and it was all summed up in the saying of Christ to the woman of Samaria, "God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit ; " thus setting God before the mind to be discerned only by the mind, and worshiped in a mental and spiritual conception only. 3. The Christians were almost wholly from the lower ranks. The common people heard Christ gladly ; so also did they hear his gracious gospel from his disciples. There was yet a further disadvantage, however, in the position of the Christians. Christianity had sprung from among the Jews. It had been despised by the Jews. The Jews were viewed by the Romans as the most despicable of all people. Therefore, as the Christians were despised by the Jews, who were despised by the Romans, it followed that to the Romans the Christians were the despised of the despised. It was but the record of a literal fact which Paul wrote : "We are made as the filth of the world, and are the off- scouring of all things unto this day." 1 Cor. iv, 13. The law declared that if those who did what the statute forbade belonged to the lower ranks, they were to be punished with death ; and as the Christians were mostly from the lower ranks, death became the most common penalty incurred by the profession of Christianity. There was yet another disadvantage. These laws had all been framed, and the system had been established, long before there were any Christians in the world. Therefore the teaching of the Christians, their practice, and their disre- gard of the Roman laws, appeared to the Romans in no 154 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. other light than as an open insurrection against the govern- ment, and an attempt at the dissolution of society itself. The persecution of the Christians, having its foundation principle in the system of laws and government of Rome, proceeded from four distinct causes and from four distinct sources. First, from the populace. The Christians refused to pay any respect or honor whatever to the gods to whom the people were devoted in every act and relationship of life. They were charged at once with being atheists and enemies of the gods, and therefore of being the direct cause of all the calamities and misfortunes that might befall anybody from any source. Everything in nature, as well as in the life of the individual, was presided over by some particular deity, and therefore whatever, out of the natural order, might happen in the course of the seasons or in the life of the individual, was held to be a token of the anger of the insulted gods, which was only to be appeased by the punish- ment of the Christians. If the fall of rain was long delayed so that crops and pastures suffered, it was laid to the charge of the Christians. If when rain did come, there was too much so that the rivers overflowed and did damage, they charged this likewise to the Christians. If there was an earthquake or a famine, the Christians' disrespect to the gods was held to be the cause of it. If an epidemic broke out, if there was an invasion by the barbarians, or if any public calamity occurred, it was all attributed to the anger of the gods, which was visited upon the State and the people on account of the spread of Christianity. For instance ; Esculapius was the god of healing, and as late as the time of Diocletian, when a plague had spread far through the empire and continued a long time, Porphyry, who made strong pretensions to being a philosopher, actually argued that the reason why the plague could not be checked was that the spread of Christianity had destroyed the influence of Esculapius. When such things SUPERSTITION AND SELFISHNESS. 155 as this were soberly announced as the opinion of the wise, it can readily be understood how strong a hold the same super- stition had upon the minds of the common heathen. The turning away of individuals from the worship of the gods and their renouncing all respect for them, and holding as idolaters only, those who would show respect to them, excited the most bitter feelings in the great mass of the people. When there was added to this the calamities and misfortunes that might befall, which were held to be but a manifestation of the anger of the gods, and their sympathy with the people in their antagonism to Christianity, all these things tended only to deepen that feeling of bitterness and to inspire the populace with the idea that they were doing the will of the gods, and performing the most accept- able service, when they executed vengeance upon the offend- ing Christians. And "when superstition has once found out victims, to whose guilt or impiety it may ascribe the divine anger, human revenge mingles itself with the relent- less determination to propitiate offended heaven, and con- tributes still more to blind the judgment and exasperate the passions. " \Milman. n JSTor was this resentment always confined to respect for the gods, but often private spite and personal animosities were indulged under cover of allegiance to the gods and respect to the laws. This was shown not only by prosecu- tion before the magistrates, but by open riot and mob violence ; and there was no lack of individuals to work upon the riotous propensities of the superstitiously enraged people. For instance, one Alexander of Abonoteichus, a magician, when he found that his tricks failed to excite the wonder that he desired, declared that the Pontus was filled with atheists and Christians, and called on the people to stone them if they did not want to draw down on themselves the anger of the gods. He went so far at last as never to attempt to give an exhibition until he had first proclaimed, "If any atheist, 11 " History of Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 27. 156 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. Christian, or Epicurean has slipped in here as a spy, let him be gone." The second source from which proceeded the persecution of the Christians was the priests and artisans. The priests had charge of the temples and sacrifices, by which they re- ceived their living and considerable profit besides. Pliny's testimony, before quoted, plainly says that in his province "the temples were almost forsaken," and of the sacrifices "very few purchasers had of late appeared." The influence of Christianity reached much farther than to those who openly professed it. Many, seeing the Christians openly for- saking the gods, and refusing to offer sacrifices, would like- wise, merely upon economical principles, stop making sacri- fices in the temples. The priests and the traffickers in sacri- ficial offerings, seeing their gains falling off, were not slow in charging to the Christians the delinquency, were prompt to prosecute them before the tribunals, and were very diligent to secure the most rigid enforcement of the laws command- ing sacrifice to the gods. From the same cause the artisans found their gains vanishing, through the diminished sale of carved and engraved images, amulets, etc. Upon which, like that Demetrius of the Scriptures who made silver shrines for Diana (Acts xix, 21-29), .they became very zeal- ous for the honor of the gods, and raised persecution against the disciples in order to restore the worship of the gods and their own accustomed income. A third source from which persecution arose was the governors of provinces. Some of these were of cruel and splenetic disposition, and, holding a personal animosity against the Christians, were glad of the opportunity to be the ministers of such laws as were of force against them. Others who were totally indifferent to the merits of the question, yet who earnestly desired to be popular, were ready to take part with the people in their fanatical rage, and to lend their power and use their official influence against the Christians. Yet others who had no particular THE GOVERNORS OF PROVINCES. care for the worship of the gods, could not understand the Christians' refusal to obey the laws. The governors could see nothing in such a refusal to obey the law and perform the ceremonies therein prescribed, but what appeared to them to be blind, willful obstinacy and downright stubbornness. They regarded such willful disobedience to the law to be much more worthy of condem- nation than even the disrespect to the gods. Such a one was Pliny, who said, ' ' Let their confessions be of any sort whatever, this positiveness in inflexible obstinacy deserved to be punished." Many of the governors "would sooner pardon in the Christians their defection from the worship of the gods, than their want of reverence for the emperors, in declining to take any part in those idolatrous demonstrations of homage which pagan flattery had invented, such as sprinkling their images with incense, and swearing by their genius. " Necmder. 12 Still others were disposed to be favorable to the Chris- tians, to sympathize with them in their difficult positions, and to temper as far as possible the severity of the laws against them. And when the Christians were prosecuted before their tribunals, they would make personal appeals to induce them to make some concession, however slight, that would justify the governor in certifying that they had con- formed to the law, so that he might release them, not only from that particular accusation, but from any other that might be made. Such governors would plead with the Christians to this effect, "I do not wish to see you suffer ; I know you have done no real harm, but there stands the law. I am here as the representative of the empire to see that the laws are enforced. I have no personal interest whatever in this matter ; therefore I ask you for my own sake that you will do some honor to the gods, however slight, whereby I may be relieved from executing this penalty and causing you to suffer. All that is required is that you shall worship the 12 Id., par. 5. 158 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. gods. Now your God is one of the gods ; therefore what harm is there in obeying the law which commands to worship the gods without reference to any particular one ? Why not say, 'The Emperor our lord,' and sprinkle a bit of incense toward his image ? Merely do either of these two simple things, then I can certify that you have conformed to the law, and release you from this and all future prosecutions of the kind. " When the Christian replied that he could not under any form or pretense whatever worship any other God than the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ ; nor honor any other by any manner of offering ; nor call the emperor lord in the meaning of the statute, then the governor, understanding nothing of what the Christian called conscience, and seeing all of what he considered the kindest possible offers counted not only as of no worth but even as a reproach, his proffered mercy was often turned into wrath. He considered such a refusal only an evidence of open ingratitude and obsti- nacy, and that therefore such a person was unworthy of the slightest consideration. He held it then to be only a proper regard for both the gods and the State to execute to the utmost the penalty which the law prescribed. Another thing that made the action of the Christians more obnoxious to the Roman magistrates, was not only their persistent disregard for the laws touching religion, but their assertion of the right to disregard them. And this plea seemed the more impertinent from the fact that it was made by the despised of the despised. The fourth source from which persecution came to the Christians was the emperors. Yet until Christianity had become so wide-spread as to attract the attention of the emperor, there was no general persecution from this source. The first persecution by the direct instigation of the em- perors was that inflicted by Nero. With this exception, the persecution of the Christians by the emperors was solely as the representatives of the State, to maintain the authority of STATE SELF-PRESERVATION. 159 the State and the dignity of her laws ; and to preserve the State from the certain ruin which they supposed to be threatened from Christianity. This explains why it was that only the best of the emperors persecuted the Christians, as such. In the emperor was merged the State. He alone repre- sented the divinity of the Roman State. The Christians' refusal to recognize in him that divinity or to pay respect to it in any way, was held to be open disrespect to the State. The Christians' denial of the right of the State to make or enforce any laws touching religion or men's relationship to God, was counted as an undermining of the authority of government. As it was held that religion was essential to the very existence of the State, and that the State for its own sake, for its own self-preservation, must maintain proper respect for religion ; when Christianity denied the right of the State to exercise any authority or jurisdiction whatever in religious things, it was held to be but a denial of the right of the State to preserve itself. Therefore when Christianity had become quite generally spread throughout the empire, it seemed to such emperors as Marcus Aurelius, Decius, Yalerian, and Diocletian em- perors who most respected Roman institutions that the very existence of the empire was at stake. Consequently their opposition to Christianity was but an effort to save the State, and was considered by them as the most reasonable and laudable thing in the world. And it was only as a mat- ter of State policy that they issued edicts or emphasized those already issued for the suppression of Christianity. In making or enforcing laws against the Christians it was in- variably the purpose of these emperors to restore and to pre- serve the ancient dignity and glory of the Roman State. In an inscription by Diocletian, it is distinctly charged that by Christianity the State was being overturned, and his views on this subject are seen in the following extract from one of his edicts : 160 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. "The immortal gods have, by their providence, arranged and estab- lished what is right. Many wise and good men are agreed that this should be maintained unaltered. They ought not to be opposed. No new religion must presume to censure the old, since it is the greatest of crimes to overturn what has been once established by our ancestors, and what has supremacy in the State." 18 This is further shown by the following words from the edict of Galerius putting a stop to the persecution of Chris- tianity : " Among other matters which we have devised for the benefit and common advantage of our people, we have first determined to restore all things according to the ancient laws and the public institutions of the Romans. And to make provision for this, that also the Christians, who have left the religion of their fathers, should return again to a good purpose and resolution." 13 With persecution proceeding from these four sources, it is evident that from the day that Christ sent forth his disciples to preach the gospel, the Christians were not certain of a moment's peace. It might be that they could live a consid- erable length of time unmolested ; but yet they were at no time sure that it would be so, because they were subject at all times to the spites and caprices of individuals and the populace, and at any hour of the day or night any Christian was liable to be arrested and prosecuted before the tribunals, or to be made the butt of the capricious and violent temper of the heathen populace. Yet to no one of these sources more than another, could be attributed the guilt or the dishonor of the persecution, because each one was but the inevitable fruit of that system from which persecution is inseparable. The theory which attaches blame to the emperors as the persecutors of the Christians is a mistaken one, because the emperor was but the representative, the embodiment, of the State itself. The 12 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," sec. i, div. iii, under " Diocletian." 13 Eusebius's "Ecclesiastical History," book viii, chap, xvii, STATE RELIGION MEANS PERSECUTION. 161 State of Rome was a system built up by the accumulated wisdom of all the Roman ages ; and to expect him whose chief pride was that he was a Roman, and who was conscious that it was the highest possible honor to be a Roman em- peror to expect such a one to defer to the views of a new and despised sect of religionists whose doctrines were en- tirely antagonistic to the entire system of which he was a representative, would be to expect more than Roman pride would bear. As the case stood, to have done such a thing, would have been to make himself one of the despised sect, or else the originator of another one, worthy only, in the eyes of the populace, of the same contempt as these. Of course we know now that the emperors should have done just that thing, and they were told then that they ought to do it, but the fact is nevertheless that Roman pride would not yield. Nor is this the only case of the kind in the his- tory of Christianity. The theory that would make the governors responsible is likewise a mistaken one, because the governors were simply the officers of the State set over a particular province to conduct the affairs of the government and to maintain the laws. It was not in their power to set aside the laws, although as we have seen, some of them even went as far as possible in that direction rather than cause the Chris- tians to suffer by enforcing the law. The only theory that will stand the test at all is that which places upon the priests and the people the guilt of the persecutions. They were the ones who did it from real bitterness of the persecuting spirit. And yet to attach all the blame to these, would be a mistake, because it would have been impossible for them to persecute had it not been for the system of government of which they were a part. Had the State been totally separated from religion, taking no cognizance of it in any way whatever ; had the State confined itself to its proper jurisdiction, and used its power and authority to compel people to be civil and to maintain 15 162 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. the public peace, it would have been impossible for either people, priests, governors, or emperors, to be persecutors. Had there been no laws on the subject of religion, no laws enforcing respect for the gods, nor prohibiting the introduc- tion of new religions, even though religious controversies might have arisen, and having arisen even had they engen- dered bitter controversies and stirred up spiteful spirits, it would have been impossible for any party to do any manner of wrong to another. Instead of this, however, the Roman government was a system in which religion was inseparable from the State a system in which the religion recognized was held as essential to the very existence -of the State ; and the laws which com- pelled respect to this religion were but the efforts of the State at self-preservation. Therefore there was a system per- manently established, and an instrument formed, ready to be wielded by every one of these agencies to persecute the pro- fessors of that religion. Except in cases of the open violence of the mob, all that was done in any instance by any of the agencies mentioned, was to enforce the law. If the Christians had obeyed the laws, they never would have been persecuted. But that was the very point at issue. It was not right to obey the laws. Tlie laws were wrong. To obey the laws was to cease to be a Christian. To obey the laws was to dishonor God and to deny Christ. To obey the laws was to consent that mankind should be deprived of the blessing of both civil and religious liberty, as well as to forfeit for themselves eternal life. If religion be properly a matter of State, and rightfully a subject of legislation, then there never was any such thing as persecution of the Christians. And what is more, there never has been in all history any such thing as persecution on account of religion. If religion be properly a subject of legislation and of law, then it is the right of the State to make any laws it may choose on the subject of religion ; and it is its right to attach to these laws whatever penalty will CHRISTIANITY VICTORIOUS. 163 most surely secure proper respect for the religion chosen. And if the legislation be right, if the law be right, the en- forcement of the law under whatever penalty cannot be wrong. Consequently if religion be properly a matter of the State, of legislation, and of law, there never was and there never can be any such thing as persecution on account of religion or for conscience' sake. From all these evidences it is certain that the real blame and the real guilt of the persecution of the Christians by the Roman empire lay in the pagan theory of State and govern- ment the union of religion and the State. This was the theory of the State, and the only theory that then held sway, and this necessarily embodied both a civil and a religious despotism. And as Jesus Christ came into the world to set men free and to plant in their hearts and minds the genuine principles of liberty, it was proper that he should command that this message of freedom, and this principle of liberty, should be proclaimed in all the world to every creature, even though it should meet with the open hostility of earth's mightiest power. And proclaim it his disciples did, at the expense of heavy privations and untold sufferings. "Among the authentic records of pagan persecutions, there are histories which display, perhaps more vividly than any other, both the depth of cruelty to which human nature may sink, and the heroism of resistance it may attain. . . . The most horrible recorded instances of torture were usually inflicted, either by the populace or in their presence in the arena. We read of Christians bound in chairs of red-hot iron, while the stench of their half-consumed flesh rose in a suffocating cloud to heaven ; of others who were torn to the very bone by shells or hooks of iron ; of holy virgins given over to the lust of the gladiator, or to the mercies of the pander ; of two hundred and twenty-seven converts sent on one occasion to the mines, each with the sinews of one leg severed by a red-hot iron, and with an eye scooped from its socket ; of fires so slow that the victims writhed for hours in 164 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. their agonies ; of bodies torn limb from limb, or sprinkled with burning load ; of mingled salt and vinegar poured over the flesh that was bleeding from the rack ; of tortures pro- longed and varied through entire days. For the love of their divine Master, for the cause they believed to be true, men, and even weak girls, endured these things without flinching, when one word would have freed them from their sufferings. No opinion we may form of the proceedings of priests in a later age, should impair the reverence with which we bend before the martyr's tomb." -Lecky. u All this was endured by men and women, and even weak girls, that people in future ages might be free free to wor- ship according to the dictates of their own consciences free both civilly and religiously. All this was endured in sup- port of the principle that with religion civil government can of right have nothing to do. Yet for two hundred and fifty years this contest continued. On one side was the poor and despised, on the other the rich and the honored. On one side was the apparently weak, yet really strong ; on the other the apparently powerful, yet really weak. On one side was a new doctrine sustained by no earthly power, and without recognition ; on the other side was a system which was the outgrowth of ages, and supported by all the resources of the mightiest empire that the world had ever known. Yet it was the conflict of truth and right against error and wrong, of the power of God against the power of the Roman State ; and it was bound to conquer. Two hundred and fifty years this contest continued, and then as the out- come of the longest, the most wide-spread, and the most ter- rible persecution that ever was inflicted by the Roman State, that empire was forced officially to recognize the right of every man to worship as he pleased. Thus was Christianity acknowledged to be victorious over all the power of Rome. The rights of conscience were established, and the separa- tion of religion and the State was virtually complete. 14 " History of European Morals," end of chap, iii, CHRISTIANITY MEANS RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE. 105 Whatever men may hold Christianity to be, however they may view it, whether as the glorious reality that it is, or only a myth ; whether as the manifestation of the truth of God, or only an invention of men ; it never can be denied that from Christianity alone the world received that inestimable boon, the rights of conscience ; and the principle invaluable alike to religion, the State, and the individual of the absolute, complete, and total separation between the civil and the religious powers. It never can be denied that Christianity was in the Roman empire in the first and second centuries as really as it ever was at any time afterward. Marcus Aurelius, Sueto- nius, Hadrian, Tacitus, Trajan, and Pliny, all give the most unexceptionable testimony that it was there. And just as certainly as it was there, so certainly did it proclaim the right of men to worship according to the dictates of 'their own consciences, and that the State has not of right any- thing to do with religion. And so certainly was there a prolonged and terrible contest upon this issue. Therefore those who object to Christianity while advocating the rights of conscience, and opposing a union of religion and the State, contradict themselves and undermine the foundation upon which they stand. Christianity is the glorious original of the rights of conscience and of the individual. Jesus Christ was the first to announce it to the world ; and his disciples were the first to proclaim it to all men, and to maintain it in behalf of all men in all future ages. George Bancroft states the literal truth when he says : "No one thought of vindicating religion for the conscience of the individual, till a voice in Judea, breaking day for the greatest epoch in the life of humanity, by establishing a pure, spiritual, and universal religion for all mankind, enjoined to render to Caesar only that which is Caesar's. The rule was upheld during the infancy of the gospel for all men." 15 15 "History of the Formation of the Constitution of the United States," book v, chap, i, par. 10. 166 CHRISTIANITY AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE. Therefore it is not too much to repeat that, from Chris- tianity alone the world has received that inestimable boon, the rights of conscience ; and the principle invaluable alike to religion, the State, and the individual of the absolute, complete, and total separation between the civil and the relig- ious powers. Yet this victory of Christianity over Pagan Rome was no sooner won, and the assured triumph of Christianity was no sooner at hand, than ambitious bishops and political priests perverted it and destroyed the prospect of all its splendid fruit. They seized upon the civil power, and by making the State the servant of the church, established a despotism as much more cruel than the one which had just been con- quered, as the truth which was thus perverted was higher, nobler, and .more glorious than the evil system which had been established in the blindness and error of paganism. The system which had been conquered was that in which the State recognizes and makes use of religion only for its political value, and only as the servant of the State. This was paganism, and such a system is pagan wherever found. The system which was established by the perversion of Christianity and the splendid victory that it had won, was a system in which the State is made the servant of the church, and in which the power of the State is exercised to promote the interests of the church. This was the papacy. And to tell the history of the perversion of Christianity, and the establishment, and the support, of the papal des- potism, is the purpose of the following chapters of this book. CHAPTER VI. THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. "PvUKING the eighty years occupied for the most part by LJ the "dark, unrelenting Tiberius, the furious Caligula, the feeble Claudius, the profligate and cruel Nero, the beastly Yitellius, and the timid, inhuman Domitian," " Rome groaned beneath an unremitting tyranny, which extermi- nated the ancient families of the republic and was fatal to almost every virtue, and every talent, that arose in that unhappy period." - Gibbon* This dreary scene was relieved by a respite of eighty-four years through the successful reigns of Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius ; only to be opened up again by Commodus, A. D. 180, and to continue unrelieved for more than one hundred years. It is useless to pursue the subject in detail. Of this period it may be remarked as of one before, that to attempt to follow it in detail, would be only " to record the mandates of despotism, incessant accusations, faithless friendships, the ruin of inno- cence ; one unvarying repetition of causes terminating in the same event, and presenting no novelty from their simi- larity and tiresome reiteration." Tacitus? The inroads of the barbarians obliged the legions to be always stationed on the frontier of the empire, all the way from the mouth of the Rhine to the mouth of the Danube. Emperors were made and unmade by the soldiers according to their own caprice, many of whom never saw the capital 111 Decline and Fall," chap, iii, par. 83. 2 " Annals," book iv, chap, xxxlii. [167] 168 THE RISE OF CON8TANTINE. of their empire ; and the office was one so certainly to be terminated by murder that although from Commodus to Constantine there were sixty men named as emperor, only seven died a natural death ; two Decius and Valerian perished by the enemy ; and all the rest were murdered in the internal strifes of the failing empire. DIOCLETIAN, the commander of the imperial body-guard, was proclaimed emperor by the troops September 17, 285. He organized a system by which he wished to give to the office of emperor a tenure more secure than that allowed by the licentious caprice of the soldiery. He reigned alone only about six months, when April 1, A. D. 286 he associated with him- self in the office of emperor, Maximian. Six years after- ward, March 1, A. D. 292, he named two other associates, Galerius and Constantius, though in inferior stations. Dio- cletian and Maximian each bore the title of Augustus, while Galerius and Constantius each bore that of Caesar. Both these Caesars were already married, but each was obliged to put away his wife and be adopted as a son, and marry a daughter, of one of the Augusti. Galerius was adopted as the son of Diocletian, and married his daughter ; Constan- tius as the son of Maximian, and married his step-daughter. The empire was then divided into four principal parts, each to be governed by one of the four emperors. Diocletian re- tained as his part, Thrace, Egypt, and Asia. To Maximian was given Italy and Africa. Upon Galerius was bestowed what was known as the Illyrian provinces, bounded by Thrace, the Adriatic, the Danube, the Alps, and the Khine ; while to Constantius fell all that was west of the Rhine and the Alps ; namely, Gaul, Spain, and Britain. It appease to have been Diocletian's intention that when- ever the place of either of the two Augusti became vacant, it should be filled by one of the Caesars, whose place in turn should be filled by a new appointment, thus securing a per- DIOCLETIAN. THE PERSECUTION UNDER DIOCLETIAN. 169 manent, peaceful, and steady succession to the imperial authority. Nor did the division and distribution of the offices stop here. It was extended in regular gradation to the smallest parts of the empire. Diocletian fixed his capital at Nicomedia ; and Maximian his at Milan, which under his care assumed the splendor of an imperial city. "The houses are described as numerous and well built ; the man- ners of the people as polished and liberal. A circus, a theater, a mint, a palace, baths, which bore the name of their founder Maximian ; porticoes adorned with statues, and a double circumference of walls contributed to the beauty of the new capital. . . . By the taste of the monarch, and at the expense of the people, Nicomedia acquired, in the space of a few years, a degree of magnificence which might appear to have required the labor of ages, and became inferior only to Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch, in extent or populousness."-- Gibbon* And with the exception of the short reign of Maxentius, from the day when these two emperors made these two cities their capitals, no emperor ever dwelt in Rome. Diocletian and Maximian also established each a court and a ceremonial modeled upon that of the king of Persia. Whoever would address the emperor must pass a succession of guards and officers, and "when a subject was at last admitted to the imperial presence, he was required, whatever might be his rank, to fall prostrate on the ground, and to adore according to the eastern fashion, the divinity of his lord and master." The two emperors assumed not exactly crowns, but diadems, the first that had been worn by Romans since the abolition of the kingly office. ' ' The sumptuous robes of Diocletian and his successors were of silk and gold, and it is remarked with indignation, that even their shoes were studded with precious stones." It is, however, as the author of the last and most terrible persecution of Christianity by Pagan Rome the last effort of the pagan State against the freedom of thought and of 3 Id., chap, xfii, par. 28. 170 THE RISE OF CONSTANTINO. worship taught by Christianity that Diocletian is chiefly known to the world, though strictly speaking he was not the author of it. Diocletian and Constantius were both friendly to the Christians, and had many professed Christians in public of- fices. In considerable numbers they were employed in Dio- cletian's palace ; but Galerius and Maximian were savagely opposed to every form of the Christian name. Galerius urged upon Diocletian the issuing of a decree condemning Christianity. Diocletian hesitated, but agreed to prohibit any Christian from holding any public office or employment, and spoke strongly against the shedding of blood. Galerius persuaded him to allow the calling of a council of the officers of the State, the outcome of which was that on February 24, A. D. 303, a "general edict of persecution was published; and though Diocletian, still averse to the effusion of blood, had moderated the fury of Galerius, who proposed that every one refusing to offer sacrifice should immediately be burnt alive, the penalty inflicted on the obstinacy of the Christians might be deemed sufficiently rigorous and ef- fectual. "It was enacted that their churches in all the provinces of the empire should be demolished to their foundations, and the punishment of death was denounced against all who should presume to hold any secret assemblies for the pur- pose of religious worship. The philosophers, who now as- sumed the unworthy office of directing the blind zeal of persecution, had diligently studied the nature and genius of the Christian religion ; and as they were not ignorant that the speculative doctrines of the faith were supposed to be contained in the writings of the prophets, of the evangelists, and of the apostles, they most probably suggested the order that the bishops and the presbyters should deliver all their sacred books into the hands of the magistrates, who were commanded under the severest penalties, to burn them in a public and solemn manner. By the same edict the property THE ATTACK 18 BEGUN. 171 of the church was at once confiscated ; and the several parts of which it might consist, were either sold to the highest bidder, united to the imperial domain, bestowed on the cities and corporations, or granted to the solicitations of rapacious courtiers. "After taking such effectual measures to abolish the worship and to dissolve the government of the Christians, it was thought necessary to subject to the most intolerable hardships the condition of those perverse individuals who should still reject the religion of nature, of Rome, and of their ancestors. Persons of a liberal birth were declared incapable of holding any honors or employments ; slaves were forever deprived of the hopes of freedom, and the whole body of the people were put out of the protection of the law. The judges were authorized to hear and to deter- mine every action that was brought against a Christian. But the Christians were not permitted to complain of any injury which they themselves had suffered ; and thus those unfortunate sectaries were exposed to the severity, while they were excluded from the benefits, of public justice." Gibbon.* The attack upon 'the church buildings began the day before this decree was published. Then, "at the earliest dawn of day, the Praetorian prsefect, accompanied by sev- eral generals, tribunes, and officers of the revenue, repaired to the principal church of Nicomedia, which was situated on an eminence in the most populous and beautiful part of the city. The doors were instantly broke open ; Jthey rushed into the sanctuary ; and as they searched in vain for some visible object of worship, they were obliged to content themselves with committing to the flames the volumes of Holy Scripture. The ministers of Diocletian were followed by a numerous body of guards and pioneers, who marched in order of battle, and were provided with all the instru- ments used in the destruction of fortified cities. By their incessant labor, a sacred edifice which towered above the */d., chap, xvi, par. 45. THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. imperial palace, and had long excited the indignation and envy of the Gentiles, was in a few hours leveled with the ground." Gibbon* , The decree had hardly been posted up in the most public place in Nicomedia, when a professed Christian, whose zeal outran his good sense, pulled it down, and tore it to pieces. It had been now more than forty years since the decree of Gallienus had legally recognized Christianity. In this time of peace the churches had become filled with a mass of people who were Christians only in name. Large church buildings were built in all parts of the empire. The genuine faith and discipline of the church had been seriously relaxed long be- fore that, and now in this time of peace, and through the vast numbers that united themselves with the name of Chris- tianity, there came the natural result violent contention and ambitious aspirations. Quite a striking picture of the churches in this time is given us in the following extract, by one who was there at the time : " When by reason of excessive liberty, we sunk into negligence and sloth, one envying and reviling another in different ways, and we were almost, as it were, on the point of taking up arms against each other and were assailing each other with words as witR darts and spears, prelates inveighing against prelates, and people rising up against people, and hypocrisy and dissimulation had arisen to the greatest height of malig- nity, then the divine judgment which usually proceeds with a lenient hand, whilst the multitudes were yet crowding into the church, with gentle and mild visitations began to afflict its episcopacy, the persecu- tion having begun with those brethren that were in the army. But as if destitute of all sensibility, we were not prompt in measures to appease and propitiate the Deity ; some, indeed, like atheists, regarding our situ- ation as unheeded and unobserved by a providence, we added one wick- edness and misery to another. But some that appeared to be our pastors, deserting the law of piety, were inflamed against each other with mutual strifes, only accumulating quarrels and threats, rivalship, hostility, and hatred to each other, only anxious to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for themselves." Eusebius. 6 When the decree was issued for the abolition of Chris- tianity, vast multitudes of these formal professors turned 6 /d., par. 44. 6 "Ecclesiastical History," book viii, chap, i, AFFLICTIONS OF THE PERSECUTORS. back again with the same readiness and with the same selfish motives with which they had joined the church ; and as is always the case, their easy rejection of the faith made the persecution so much the more severe upon those refusing to yield. Within fifteen days after the publication of the edict, a fire broke out twice in the emperor's palace at Nicomedia, and although it was quenched both times without doing any material damage, as it was attributed to the resentment of the Christians, it caused their suffering to be yet more severe. "At first, indeed, the magistrates were restrained from the effusion of blood ; but the use of every other severity was permitted, and even recommended to their zeal ; nor could the Christians, though they cheerfully resigned the ornaments of their churches, resolve to interrupt their religious assem- blies, or to deliver their sacred books to the flames." Gibbon." 1 As they refused to discontinue their meetings or to burn the Scriptures, another edict was shortly passed, command- ing that all the bishops, presbyters, readers, and exorcists should be punished. Another' edict soon followed, com- manding the magistrates everywhere to compel all these to renounce the Christian faith and return to the worship of the gods by offering the appointed sacrifice. This again was soon followed by an edict, the fourth in the series, including the whole body of the Christians within the pro- visions of the edicts which had preceded. Heavy penalties were pronounced against all who should attempt to shield the Christians from the force of the edicts. "Many were .burnt alive, and the tortures by which the persecutors sought to shake their resolution were so dreadful that even such a death seemed an act of mercy. The only province of the empire where the Christians were at peace was Gaul, which had received its baptism of blood under Marcus Aurelius, but was now governed by Constantius Chlorus, who protected them from personal molestation, 7 "Decline and Fall," chap, xvl, par. 48, 174 THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. though he was compelled, in obedience to the emperor, to destroy their churches. In Spain, which was also under the government, but not under the direct inspection of Constan- tius, the persecution was moderate, but in all other parts of the empire it raged with fierceness, till the abdication of Diocletian in 305. This event almost immediately restored peace to the western province, but greatly aggravated the misfortunes of the Eastern Christians, who passed under the absolute rule of Galerius. Horrible, varied, and prolonged tortures were employed to quell their fortitude, and their final resistance was crowned by the most dreadful of all deaths, roasting over a slow fire. "It was not till A. D. 311, eight years after the com- mencement of the general persecution, ten years after the first measure against the Christians, that the Eastern perse- cution ceased. Galerius, the archenemy of the Christians, was struck down by a fearful disease. His body, it is said, became a mass of loathsome and fetid sores a living corpse, devoured by countless worms, and exhaling the odor of a charnel-house. He who had shed so much innocent blood, shrank himself from -a Roman death. In his extreme anguish he appealed in turn to physician after physician, and to temple after temple. At last he relented towards the Christians. He issued a proclamation restoring them to liberty, permitting them to rebuild their churches, and ask- ing their prayers for his recovery." Lecky* The edict of Galerius here referred to was as follows : "Among the important cares which have occupied our mind for the utility and preservation of the empire, it was our intention to correct and re-establish all things according to the ancient laws and public discipline of the Romans. We were particularly desirous of reclaiming, into the way of reason and nature, the deluded Christians, who had renounced the religion and ceremonies instituted by their fathers ; and presumptuously despising the practice of antiquity, had invented extrava- gant laws and opinions according to the dictates of their fancy, and had collected a various society from the different provinces of our empire. 8 " History of European Morals," chap, iii, par. 3 from the end. ROME SURRENDERS. 175 The edicts which we have published to enforce the worship of the gods, having exposed many of the Christians to danger and distress, many having suffered death, and many more who still persist in their impious folly, being left destitute of any public exercise of religion, we are disposed to extend to those unhappy men the effects of our wonted clemency. We permit them therefore freely to profess their private opinions and to assemble in their conventicles without fear or molesta- tion, provided always that they preserve a due respect to the established laws and government. By another rescript we shall signify our inten- tions to the judges and magistrates, and we hope that our indulgence will engage the Christians to offer up their prayers to the deity whom they adore, for our safety and prosperity, for their own, and for that of the republic." 9 Shortly after Diocletian issued the last of the four edicts against Christianity, and in the twenty-second year of his reign, he abdicated the empire, May 1, A. D. 305. By previ- ous arrangement Maximian on his part also abdicated the imperial authority at his palace in Milan. " The abdication of Diocletian and Maximian was succeeded by eighteen years of discord and confusion. The empire was afflicted by five civil wars ; and the remainder of the time was not so much a state of tranquillity as a suspension of arms be- tween several hostile monarchs who, viewing each other with an eye of fear and hatred, strove to increase their respective forces at the expense of their subjects."- - G'ibbon. w Galerius and Constantius immediately succeeded to the places of these two, each' assuming the title of Augustus. Galerius at once assumed to himself the authority to appoint the two Caesars, without waiting to consult Constantius. As a matter of course he appointed those whom he could use to promote his own ambitious designs to secure to himself the supreme authority in the empire. One of these was his own nephew, Maximin, who was given command of Syria and Egypt. The other was one of his own subordinate officers, Severus, who was sent to Milan to succeed Maximian. 'Eusebius's "Ecclesiastical History," book viii, chap. xvii. I adopt Gibbon's translation, " Decline and Fall," chap, xvi, par. 56. 10 /d., chap, xiv, par. 1. 16 176 THE RISE OF CON8TANTINE. Thus Galerius virtually held control of three fourths of the empire, and only waited a good opportunity to lay claim to the rest. This opportunity he supposed was given him when, July 25, A. D. 306, Constantius died in Britain ; but he was disappointed, for as soon as Constantius was dead, the army proclaimed Constantine Augustus and emperor, and a messenger was sent to Galerius to announce to him the fact. Such a proceeding had not been included in his plans, and Galerius threatened to burn both the letter and the messenger who brought it. Constantine, however, at the head of the legions of Britain, was in a position not to be despised. Galerius, therefore, decided to make the best of the situation. He recognized Constantine as the successor of Constantius in that division of the empire, with the title of Caesar, but fourth in rank, while he raised Severus to the dignity of Augustus. Just at this time there was another important move upon the stage of action. The people of the city of Rome were greatly offended at the action of Diocletian in removing the capital, and Galerius now took a step that deepened their sense of injury. A general census was begun to list all the property of the Roman citizens for the purpose of levying a general tax. Wherever there was any suspicion of conceal- ment of any property, the citizen was tortured to compel an honest statement of his possessions. Rome had been exempt from taxation for nearly five hundred years, and when the census takers began their work there, the injury which the people felt that they had already suffered by the removal of their capital, was so deepened, that they broke out into open revolt, and proclaimed Maxentius emperor, October 28, A. D. 306. Maxentius was the son of Maximian. "The praefect of the city and a few magistrates, who maintained their fidelity to Severus, were massacred by the guards ; and Maxentius, invested with the imperial ornaments, was ac- knowledged by the applauding Senate and people as the protector of the Roman freedom and dignity." Gibbon. 11 11 /d., chap, xiv, par. 10. SIX EMPERORS AT ONCE. At the invitation of Maxentius and the Senate, Maximian gladly left his place of retirement, and again assumed the position of associate emperor. Galerius ordered Severus, who was stationed at Milan, to march to Rome and put down this .rebellion. But when he reached the city, he found it so well fortified and defended against him that he dared not attack it. Besides this, a large number of his troops deserted him to their old commander Maximian, and he was compelled, if he would save his life, to march back again as fast as he could. He stopped at Ravenna, which was strongly fortified, and where he had a large fleet. Max- imian soon came up and began a seige. Severus had found so little favor among the people of Italy, and had been deserted by so large a number of his troops, that Max- imian found it an easy task to convince him that there was a plan formed by the city of Ravenna also, to betray him and deliver him up. By this means, and the positive assurance that his life would be preserved, Severus was persuaded to surrender. But no sooner was the city secured, than he found that the only liberty that was left him was to kill himself. February A. D. 307, Maximian went to Milan, took pos- session of his former capital, and without waiting, crossed the Alps to meet Constantine, who was then at Aries in Gaul. March 31 an alliance was formed. Constantine married Maximian's daughter Fausta, and Maximian gave him the title of Augustus. Galerius himself now under- took to punish the Romans for their rebellion ; but his experience was identical with that of Severus, only that he was fortunate enough to escape with his life and some of his troops. In his retreat, the enmity of the Romans was yet more deepened by the desolation which his legions left in their train. "They murdered, they ravished, they plun- dered, they drove away the flocks and herds of the Italians ; they burnt the villages through which they passed, and they endeavored to destroy the country which it had not been in their power to subdue." - GH&on 12 Id., par. 14. 178 THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. Galerius, not willing to recognize either Maxentius or Maximian, appointed Licinius to the office of Augustus, November 11, 307, to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Severus. Maximin, governor of Syria and Egypt, with the title of Cassar, no sooner heard of the appointment of Licinius to the title of Augustus, than he demanded of Galerius the same honor ; and the demand was made in a tone which in the existing condition of things Galerius w r as compelled to respect. Thus at the beginning of the year 308, "for the first, and indeed for the last, time the Roman world was administered by six emperors." - G-ibbon. It was not however the purpose of these six emperors to administer the Roman world together. Each one was deter- mined to administer it alone. Each one was jealous of all the others, and narrowly watched them all, ready instantly to grasp and make the most of whatever opportunity might present itself. The first two of the emperors between whom this mutual jealousy produced an open quarrel, were Maxim- ian and Maxentius. Maxentius refused to acknowledge him- self subordinate to his father, and his father insisted that it was by his ability as a commander that Maxentius was made secure in his claim to the dignity of emperor. The differ- ence between them was submitted to the troops for decision. They decided in favor of Maxentius. Maximian left his son and Italy, and went to his son-in-law Constantino, in Gaul, and there a second time he abdicated the imperial dignity ; but only that he might the more securely contrive new mischiefs. Not long afterward an invasion of the Franks called Constantine and his troops to the Rhine north of the Moselle. A report of the death of Constantine was hastily seized upon by Maximian as the truth, and he assumed the position of emperor ; took the money from Constantino's treasury, and distributed it among the soldiers ; and began overtures for an alliance with Maxentius. Constantine heard of Max- irnian's movements ; marched quickly from the Rhine to the 13 Id., par. 15. ROMAN EMBASSIES TO CONSTANTINE. If9 Saone ; took some boats at Chalons ; and with his legions so unexpectedly arrived at Aries that Maximian considered it his only safety to take refuge in Marseilles. Constantine followed and attacked the city. The garrison gave up Maximian, who, like Severus, was allowed the choice of killing himself or of being put to death. Galerius died in the month of May, A. D. 311. Four of the six emperors now remained, and another apportionment of the eastern dominions was made between Licinius and Maximin. With the latter Maxentius formed an alliance which drew Constantine and Licinius together on the other side. " Maxentius was cruel, rapacious, and profligate," "a tyrant as contemptible as he was odious." In him it seemed as though the times of Commodus and Elagabalus were returned. In A. D. 308, Marcellus was elected bishop of Rome. "This new bishop wished to avail himself of the calm which religion enjoyed, at the commencement of his pon- tificate, to ordain rules and re-establish in the church the discipline which the troubles [of the Galerian persecution] had altered. But his severity rendered him odious to the people, and caused divisions among the faithful. Discord degenerated into sedition, arid the quarrel terminated in murder." Maxentius blamed Marcellus as being the chief cause of these disturbances, ' ' and condemned him to groom post-horses in a stable on the high-road.'' After about nine months of this service, some priests suc- ceeded in carrying Marcellus off. They concealed him in the house of a Roman lady named Lucilla. When the offi- cers would have taken him again, the faithful assembled under arms to defend him. Maxentius ordered out his guards and dispersed them. He then commanded that Lucilla's house should be converted into a stable, and ob- liged Marcellus to continue in the office of groom. In Jan- uary, A. D. 310, Marcellus died, and was succeeded by Eusebius, whom Maxentius banished to Sicily. He died 180 THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. there after a few months, and was succeeded by Melchiades, in the same year, A. D. 310. In A. D. 311, Melchiades wrote a letter to Constantine, and sent it by a delegation of bishops to him at Treves in Gaul, inviting him to come to the relief of the church, and the conquest of Rome. Constantine deliberated, and Max- entius became more and more tyrannical. In A. D. 312, an embassy from Rome went to Constantine at Aries, and in the name of the Senate and people requested him to de- liver the city from the despotism of the tyrant. Constan- tine gladly embraced the opportunity thus offered, and quickly set out toward Rome. 14 At Turin he met and destroyed a strong body of the troops of Maxentius ; and at Verona after, a considerable siege of the city, and a hard-fought battle in the field, which, beginning in the afternoon, continued through the whole of the following night, he vanquished quite a formidable army. Between Verona and Rome there was nothing to check the march of Constantine. Maxentius drew out his army, and met Constantine on the banks of the Tiber, nine miles from Rome. He crossed the Tiber and set his army in battle array, with the river in his rear. The battle was joined. Maxentius was soon defeated ; and his army, broken to pieces, attempted to escape. In the confusion and by the terrible onslaught of Constantino's veterans, thousands of the soldiers of Maxentius were crowded into the river and drowned. Maxentius, endeavoring to escape on his horse across the Milvian bridge, was crowded off into the river, and being clothed with heavy armor, was drowned, October 28, A. D. 3] 2. In the month of March, 313, Constantine and Licinius met in Milan. Constantine's sister Constantia was given in marriage to Licinius as a bond of friendship between the u De Cormenin, "History of the Popes," Marcellus, Eusebius, and Mel- chiades; Bower, "History of the Popes," Liberius, par. 16; Gibbon, "Decline and Fall," chap, xiv, par. 20. THE EDICT OF MILAN. 181 two emperors. Maximin, on hearing of the death of Max- entius, declared war against Licinius, and started with an army from Syria toward Europe. He crossed the Bosphorus, captured Byzantium, marched onward and took Heraclea. By this time Licinius himself had arrived within eighteen miles of that place, and April 30 a battle was fought, and Maximin was defeated. He himself, however, escaped, and in the month of the following August, his life ended in a manner not certainly known. The edict of Galerius restoring to the Christians the right to worship had had little or no effect upon Maximin. In his dominions and by his direction the persecutions had continued. Before Constantine and Licinius had separated, after their meeting at Milan in March, they jointly issued the celebrated edict of Milan, which acknowledged the right for which Christianity had contended for two hundred and fifty weary and painful years, by confirming " to each individ- ual of the Roman world the privilege of choosing and pro- fessing his own religion." That edict is as follows : "Wherefore, as I, Constantine Augustus, and I, Licinius Augustus, came under favorable auspices to Milan, and took under consideration all affairs that pertained to the public benefit and welfare, these things among the rest appeared to us to be most advantageous and profitable to all. ' ' We have resolved among the first things to ordain those matters by which reverence and worship to the Deity might be exhibited. That is, how Ve may grant likewise to the Christians, and to all, the free choice to follow that mode of worship which they may wish. That whatsoever divinity and celestial power may exist, may be propitious to us and to all that live under our government. Therefore, we have decreed the following ordinance as our will, with a salutary and most correct inten- tion, that no freedom at all shall be refused to Christians, to follow or to keep their observances or worship. But that to each one power be granted to devote his mind to that worship which he may think adapted to himself. That the Deity may in all things exhibit to us his accustomed favor and kindness. " It was just and consistent that we should write that this was our pleasure. That all exceptions respecting the Christians being completely 182 THE RISE OF CONSTANTINE. removed, which were contained in the former epistle that we sent to your fidelity, and whatever measures were wholly sinister and foreign to our mildness, that these should be altogether annulled ; and now that each one of the Christians may freely and without molestation pursue and follow that course and worship which he has proposed to himself : which, indeed, we have resolved to communicate most fully to your care and diligence, that you may know we have granted liberty and full freedom to the Christians, to observe their own mode of worship ; which as your fidelity understands absolutely granted to them by us, the privilege is also granted to others to pursue that worship and religion they wish. Which it is obvious is consistent with the peace and tranquillity of our times ; that each may hate the privilege to select and to worship whatsoever divinity he pleases. But this has been done by us, that we might not appear in any manner to detract anything from any manner of religion, or any mode of worship." 21 If all the professors of Christianity had been content with this victory, and had held the tide of events steadily to the principles of this edict, the principles for which Chris- tianity had so long contended, the miseries of the ages to come would never have been. Yet in order that we may enter upon the direct history of the perversion of this victory, in such a way that it may be best understood, it is essential that we trace two other lines of events that culminate in Constantine, and which gave the most material force to that important series of movements which made the papacy a success. 21 "Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History," book x, chap. v. CHAPTER VII. ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. IN the history of mankind no form of idolatry has been more widely practiced than that of the worship of the sun. It may well be described as universal ; for there is scarcely a nation in which the worship of the sun in some form has not found a place. In Egypt, the oldest nation of historic times, under the names of Ra and Osiris, with half a dozen other forms ; in Phenicia and the land of Canaan, under the names of Baal, Melkarth, Shamas, Adoni, Moloch, and many other forms ; in Syria, Tammuz and Elagabalus ; among the Moabites, under the names of Baal-peor and Chemosh ; among the Babylonians and Assyrians, under the names of Bel and Shamas ; among the Medes and Persians and other kindred nations, under the name of Ormuz and Mithra ; among the ancient Indians, under the name of Mitra, Mithra, or Mithras ; * in Greece, under Adonis, Apollo, Bacchus, and Hercules ; in Phrygia, under the term Atys ; and in Rome, under Bacchus, Apollo, and Hercules ; in 1 This is so among the Hindus of India, even to this day. " The most sacred and the most universally used even to the present day of all Vedic prayers is that composed in the Gayatri meter, and thence called Gayatri, or, as addressed to the vivifying Sun-god, Savitri : ' Let us meditate on that excellent glory of the Divine vivifier; may he enlighten our understanding.' " " Turning toward the Eastern sky, he repeats the Gayatri or Savitri. . . . This prayer is the most sacred of all Vedic utterances, and, like the Lord's prayer among Christians, . . . must always among Hindus take precedence of all other forms of supplication. The next division of the service is called Upasthana (or Mitro-pasthana) because the worshiper abandons his sitting posture, stands erect with his face toward the rising sun, and invokes that luminary under the name of [183] 184 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. all these places, and under all these forms, the sun was wor- shiped by all these peoples. The myth of Hercules alone will illustrate the wide-spread practice of this worship : "The mythology of Hercules is of a very mixed charac- ter in the form in which it has come down to us. There is in it the identification of one or more Grecian heroes with Melcarth, the sun-god of the Phenicians. Hence we find Hercules so frequently represented as the sun-god, and his twelve labors regarded as the passage of the sun through the twelve signs of the zodiac. He is the powerful planet which animates and imparts fecundity to the universe, whose divinity has been honored in every quarter by temples and altars, and consecrated in the religious strains of all nations. From Meroe in Ethiopia, and Thebes in Upper Egypt, even to Britain, and the icy regions of Scythia ; from the ancient Taprobana and Palibothra in India, to Cadiz and the shores of the Atlantic ; from the forests of Germany to the burning sands of Africa ; everywhere, in short, where the benefits of the luminary of day are experienced, there we find established the name and worship of a Her- cules. "Many ages before the period when Alcmena is said to have lived, and the pretended Tyrinthian hero to have per- formed his wonderful exploits, Egypt and Phenicia, which certainly did not borrow their divinities from Greece, had raised temples to the sun, under a name analogous to that of Hercules, and had carried his worship to the isle of Thasus and to Gades. Here was consecrated a temple to the year, Mitra. The prayer he now repeats is Rig-veda iii, 59, of which the first verse is to the following effect : " ' Mitra, raising his voice, calls men to activity. Mitra sustains the earth and the sky. Mitra, with unwaking eye, beholds all creatures. Offer to Mitra the oblation of butter ! ' The use of this hymn, is the morning service of every Hindu." " Jteliffiaus Thought and Life in India," chap, i, last par., and chap, xv, par., 41, 57. HERCULES. THE SECRET OF SUN WORSHIP. 185 and to the months which divided it into twelve parts, that is, to the twelve labors or victories which conducted Hercules to immortality. It is under the name of Hercules Astrochyton, or the god clothed with a mantle of stars, that the poet Kon- nus designates the sun, adored by the Tyrians. ' He is the same god,' observes the poet, 'whom different nations adore under a multitude of different names : Belus on the bank of the Euphrates, Ammon in Libya, Apis at Memphis, Saturn in Arabia, 2 Jupiter in Assyria, Serapis in Egypt, Helios among the Babylonians, Apollo at Delphi, ^Esculapius throughout Greece,' etc. Martianus Capella in his hymn to the sun, as also Ausonius and Macrobius, confirms the fact of this multiplicity of names given to a single star. "The Egyptians, according to Plutarch, thought that Her- cules had his seat in the sun, and that he traveled with it around the moon. The author of the hymns ascribed to Or- pheus, fixes still more strongly the identity of Hercules with the sun. He calls Hercules ' the god who produced time, whose forms vary, the father of all things, and destroyer of all. He is the god who brings back by turns Aurora and the night, and who, moving onward from east to west, runs through the career of his twelve labors ; the valiant Titan, who chases away maladies, and delivers man from the evils which afflict him. ' ' - Antlwn. 3 By whatever name or under whatever form the sun was worshiped, there was always a female divinity associated with it. Sometimes this female was the moon, sometimes the earth, sometimes the atmosphere, and at other times simply the female principle in nature. In other forms it was the idea of a male and female blended in one, as in the case of Baalim. The female sometimes appeared as the wife of 2 Sun worship, with that of the other heavenly bodies, continued till the rise of Mahomet. The father of Mahomet, when a boy, was devoted as a sacrifice to the sun, but fortunately was ransomed. (See Gibbon, " Decline and Fall," chap. 1, par. 9.) It was from the horrors of sun-worship that Mahomet turned Arabia. 3 "Classical Dictionary," article "Hercules." 186 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. the one with whom she was worshiped ; sometimes as both the sister and the wife, as in the case of Osiris ; yet again as the wife of some other god ; and often not exactly as a wife at all, but simply as a female associate. With Osiris was associated Isis ; with Baal, Ashtaroth, or Astarte ; with Bel, Mylitta ; with Shamas, Anunit ; with Adonis, Venus ; with Hercules, Omphale ; with Apollo, Diana ; with Atys, Cybele. Sometimes they were worshiped in the images of the male and female human figure ; sometimes in the form of a bull and a heifer, as in Osiris and Isis ; sometimes in a form in which the human and the beast were blended ; some- times in a simple carved disc for the male, and a piece of carved wood for the female, as in some forms of Baal and Astarte ; sometimes in the form of stones which had fallen from heaven, but mostly in the form of cones or obelisks* which they themselves had shaped to represent the male, and of other shapes to represent the female. 'And yet in unison with all these the sun itself was worshiped, especially at its rising, by a bow or prostration, or kissing of the hand. In none of these forms, however, not even in the naked shining sun, was it the literal object that was worshiped, but certain functions or powers, of which these were but the representations. It was observed that the sun in co-opera- tion with the earth and the atmosphere which gave rain, caused all manner of verdure to spring forth and bear its proper fruit. It was held, therefore, that the sun was the supreme formative power, the mighty author of fruitfulness, and that the greatest and most glorious manifestation and exertion of his powers were employed in reproduction. Sun worship was therefore nothing more nor less than the wor- ship of the principle of reproduction in man and nature. And as the influence of the real sun was extended over and through all nature, so this principle was extended through all worship. * The obelisk, or Cleopatra's Needle, brought from Egypt and now standing in Central Park, New York City, is one of these stone sun-images. APOLLO. DIANA OF THE EPHESIANS. THE RITES OF SUN WORSHIP. 187 " All paganism is at bottom a worship of nature in some form or other, and in all pagan religions the deepest and most awe-inspiring attribute of nature was its power of re- production. The mystery of birth and becoming was the deepest mystery of nature ; it lay at the root of all thought- ful paganism, and appeared in various forms, some of a more innocent, others of a most debasing type. To ancient pagan thinkers, as well as to modern men of science, the key to the hidden secret of the origin and preservation of the universe, lay in the mystery of sex. Two energies or agents, one an active and generative, the other a feminine, passive, or susceptible one, were everywhere thought to combine for creative purposes ; and heaven and earth, sun and moon, day and night, were believed to co-operate to the production of being. Upon some such basis as this rested almost all the polytheistic worship of the old civiliza- tion ; and to it may be traced back, stage by stage, the sepa- ration of divinity into male and female gods ; the deification of distinct powers of nature, and the idealization of man's own faculties, desires, and lusts ; where every power of his understanding was embodied as an object of adoration, and every impulse of his will became an incarnation of deity. " ' ' Encyclopedia Britannica. " 5 As the sun was the great god, the supreme lord, and as he exerted his most glorious powers in reproduction, it was held to be the most acceptable worship for his devotees so to employ themselves and their powers. Consequently prostitution was the one chief characteristic of sun worship wherever found. As the association of a female without reference to relationship was the only requirement necessary to worship, the result was the perfect confusion of all rela- tionships among the worshipers, even to the mutual inter- change of garments between the sexes. In the eighteenth chapter of Leviticus there is a faithful record of such a result among the sun worshipers of the land of Canaan whom the . _ 6 Article " Christianity," 188 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. Lord caused to be blotted from the earth. The prohibition in Deuteronomy xxii, 5 " The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment " was aimed directly at this practice in sun worship. The sacrifice of virginity was the most acceptable offer- ing that ever could be made in the worship of the sun. Indeed, until this sacrifice had been made, no other offering was acceptable. One ancient writer saw the manner of wor- ship of Bel and Mylitta in Babylon, and has left a record of what he saw. He says : "The Babylonians have one most shameful custom. Every woman born in the country must once in her life go and sit down in the precinct of Venus, and there consort with a stranger. . . . Venus is called Mylitta by the Assyrians." Herodotus. 6 Baal-peor, by whose shameful worship Balaam succeeded in bringing evil upon Israel when he failed in his own ef- forts to curse them, was the god which in Moab presided over such characters as above described by Herodotus in Babylon. This particular system of worship did not pre- vail outside of Egypt and the Eastern nations. In Greece and Rome the worship was through Bacchus, Hercules, Apollo, etc., and was more in the form of festivals mys- teries celebrated with obscene symbols and in most lasciv- ious rites. The rites of Bacchus are thus described : " The worship of Bacchus prevailed in almost all parts of Greece. Men and women joined in his festivals dressed in Asiatic robes and bon- nets, their heads wreathed with vine and ivy leaves, with fawn skins flung over their shoulders, and thyrsi or blunt spears twined with vine leaves, in their hands. They ran through the country shouting lo Bacche! Euoi ! lacche! etc., swinging their thyrsi, beating on drums, and sounding various instruments. Indecent emblems were carried in procession, and the ceremonies often assumed a most immoral character and tendency. The women, who bore a chief part in these, frantic revels, were called Bacchae, Msenades, Thyiades, Euades, etc." Anthon. 1 6 Book i, chap, cxcix. 7 " Classical Dictionary," Bacchus, BACCHUS. CYBELE. SUIT WORSHIP IN THE MYSTERIES. 189 In the mysteries Bacchus was identified with Osiris, and was worshiped as the sun. In India, Schiva and his wor- ship were identical with Bacchus and his worship. "The two systems of worship have the same obscenities, and the same emblems of the generative power." Anthon* "An obscure native of Greece brought first to Etruria, and shortly afterwards to the more congenial soil of Rome, the mysterious orgies of Bacchus, which had already obtained an infamous celebrity in the East. The horrible wicked- nesses which were perpetrated at the initiations, at which the passions of the youth of either sex were inflamed by wine and musio, secresy and security, had been practiced by the devotees without remorse for some time, before they were discovered. . . . The Bacchanalia, though constantly interdicted, continued to reappear in the city." Merivale. 9 The worship of the Phrygian Cybele and Atys was com- mon in Greece five hundred years before Christ, and was introduced into Rome about 547 B. c., when an embassy was sent to the king of Pergamus to ask for the stone which rep- resented Cybele, and which was said to have fallen from heaven. The king gave up the stone, which was taken to Rome. A temple was built, and a festival established in her honor. The festival was called Megalesia, and was celebrated annually in the early part of April, and is thus described : "Like Asiatic worship in general, that of Cybele was enthusiastic. Her priests named Galli and Corybantes, ran about with dreadful cries and bowlings, beating on timbrels, clashing cymbals, sounding pipes, and cutting their flesh with knives. The box-tree and cypress were considered as sacred to her, as from the former she made the pipes, and Atys was said to have been changed into the latter." Anthon. 1 * The universality of the worship of the sun in Hercules has been already shown. Of the manner in which his wor- ship was conducted, we have the following account : 8 Id. .'" History of the Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxii, par. 19, 20. 10 " Classical Dictionary," article " Cybele." 190 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. "It seems to have beeii marked by an almost delirious sensuality. Married and unmarried females prostituted themselves at the festival of the gods. The two sexes changed their respective characters ; and tra- dition reported that Hercules himself had given an example of this, when, assuming the vestments and occupation of a female, he subjected himself to the service of the voluptuous Omphale. The Lydian Hercules was named Sandon, after the robe dyed with sandyx, in which Omphale had arrayed him, and which the females of the country imitated in cele- brating his licentious worship." Anthon. n In Rome and Italy, "The worship of Hercules was from an early date among the most widely diffused ; he was, to use the words of an ancient author, adored in every hamlet of Italy, and altars were everywhere erected- to him in the streets of the cities and along the country roads." Mommsen. 12 As before stated, the almost numberless forms of sun worship were practiced in Canaan. In the practice of these fearful abominations they had so corrupted themselves that in the expressive figure of the Scripture, the very earth had grown so sick that it was compelled to vomit out the filthy inhabitants. "The land is defiled : therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants." Lev. xviii, 25. All of this the God of heaven taught his people to renounce. "Ye shall there- fore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations ; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you : (for all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled) : that the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you. For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that com- mit them shall be cut off from among their people. There- fore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed 11 Id., "Hercules." 12 " History of Rome," book i, chap, xii, par. 25. JEHOVAH CONDEMNS 8VN" WORSHIP. 191 before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein : I am the Lord your God." Lev, xviii, 26-30. 1S In all these prohibitions the people were taught to shun as the terrible plague that it was, every suggestion of the evil influences of the worship of the sun. They were to break down all the sun-images and carved stocks groves that might be found anywhere in all the land which the Lord had given them. See Ex. xxiii, 24 ; xxxiii, 13, 14. In yet another and most comprehensive way the Lord taught his people to shun every indication of the worship of the sun. As has been shown, the devotees of the sun wor- shiped with their faces toward the east. When God estab- lished his worship with the children of Israel in the very midst of the sun worshiping nations round about, at first a sanctuary was built and afterwards a temple, where he dwelt by the glory of his presence. To the door of this sanctuary every form of sacrifice and offering was to be brought, and there they were to worship. And the door of that sanctuary (the temple also) was always toward the east, in order that all who would sacrifice to Jehovah and worship him, would in so doing turn their Txicks upon the sun and its worship ; and that whoever joined in the worship of the sun, had first to turn his back upon Jehovah. Through the periods of the judges there were lapses into sun worship among the children of Israel, but they were restored to the worship of the Lord, and by the influence of Samuel and David, and Solomon in his early days, the whole nation was separated from sun worship in all its forms, and united in the pure worship of Jehovah. Yet in his later years Solomon turned from the Lord, and "loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites ; of the nations concerning which the Lord said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you : for surely they will 13 Read also the whole of Leviticus chapters xvlil, xx. 192 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. turn away your heart after their gods : Solomon clave unto these in love. And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines : and his wives turned away his heart. For it came to pass when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods : and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtaroth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. And Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord and went not fully after the Lord, as did David his father. Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon. And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacri- ficed unto their gods." 1 Kings xi, 1-8. After the death of Solomon, the ten tribes separated themselves from Judah and Benjamin, and under the king- ship, and by the direction, of Jeroboam, established a false worship through the two golden calves copied from Egypt, one of which was placed in Bethel and the other in Dan. Each of the successors of Jeroboam walked in the way of Jeroboam "and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin," unto the time of Omri, who in this wicked way ' ' did worse than all that were before him. " ' ' And Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the Lord above all that were before him. And it came to pass as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, that he took to wife Jezebel, the daughter of Eth- baal, king of the Zidonians, and went and served Baal, and worshiped him. And he reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal, which he had built in Samaria. And Ahab made a grove ; and Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him." 1 Kings xvi, 30-33. VENUS. ASTARTE. BUN WORSHIP IN JUDAH. 193 From this it is evident that as corrupt and degrading as was the worship established by Jeroboam, that of the sun was far worse. Ethbaal was a priest of Baal and Astarte, who assassinated the king and made himself king in his stead. Jezebel brought with her into Israel the worship of Baal and Astarte, the male and female sun, and estab- lished it to such an extent that in a few years there were four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal and four hundred of Astarte, and only seven thousand people in all Israel who had not joined in the wicked worship. Elijah began a reformation, but the worship and the gods introduced by Jezebel remained in some measure till the reign of Jehu, who gathered every worshiper of Baal to a general assembly in honor of Baal, and slew them all. "And they brought forth the images out of the house of Baal, and burned them. And they brake down the image of Baal, and brake down the house of Baal, and made it a draught house unto this day. Thus Jehu destroyed Baal out of Israel. How- beit from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin, Jehu departed not from after them, to wit, the golden calves that were in Bethel and that were in Dan." 2 Kings x, 26-29. Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel, married Jehoram, the son of Jehoshaphat king of Judah, and with her, sun worship through Baal and Ashtaroth was introduced into the kingdom of Judah ; for Jehoram ' ' walked in the way of the kings of Israel, as did the house of Ahab ; for the daughter of Ahab was his wife : and he did evil in the sight of the Lord." 2 Kings viii, 18. This worship of Baalim continued till the time of Hezekiah, who ' ' brake the images [sun images] in pieces, and cut down the groves [Asheras, representations of Ashtaroth], and threw down the high places and the altars out of all Judah and Benjamin." 2 Chron. xxxi, 1. By Manasseh, however, this worship was all restored in its fullest extent ; ' ' for he built again the 194 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. high places which Hezekiah his father had broken down, and he reared up altars for Baalim, and made groves, and worshiped all the host of heaven, and served them. Also he built altars in the house of the Lord whereof the Lord had said, In Jerusalem shall my name be forever. And he built altars for all the host of heaven in the two courts of the house of the Lord. And he caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom : also he observed times and used enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a familiar spirit, and with wizards : he wrought much evil in the sight of the Lord, to provoke him to anger. And he set a carved image, the idol which he had made in the house of God of which God had said to David and to Solomon his son, In this house and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen before all the tribes of Israel, will I put my name forever." 2 Chron. xxxiii, 3-7. This image which he set in the house of the Lord was rather a double image of Baal and Ashtaroth, which he put up above the altars of Baal in the house of the Lord. The cloisters about the temple were used as stables for the horses which were dedicated to the sun. By the side of the temple he built houses for the priests and priestesses of the Baalim, where the women wove hangings for the figures of Astarte. Happily, Manasseh was succeeded by Josiah, who anni- hilated this whole system. "For in the eighth year of his reign, while he was yet young, he began to seek after the God of David his father : and in the twelfth year he began to purge Judah and Jerusalem from the high places, and the groves, and the carved images, and the molten images. And they brake down the altars of Baalim in his presence ; and the images that were on high above them he cut down ; and the groves, and the carved images, and the molten im- ages he brake in pieces and made dust of them, and strewed it upon the graves of them that had sacrificed unto them." SUN WORSHIP DESTROYS THE KINGDOM. 195 "And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the Lord, where the -women wove hangings for the grove. And he brought all the priests out of the cities of Judah and defiled the high places where the priests had burned incense, from Geba to Beer-sheba, and brake down the high places of the gates that were in the en- tering in of the gate of Joshua, the governor of the city, which were on a man's left hand at the gate of the city. . . . And he defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech. And he took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sun, at the entering in of the house of the Lord, by the chamber of Nathan-melech the chamberlain, which was in the suburbs, and burned the chariots of the sun with fire. And the altars that were on the top of the upper chamber of Ahaz, which the kings of Judah had made, and the altars which Manasseh had made in the two courts of the house of the Lord, did the king beat down, and brake them down from thence, and cast the dust of them into the brook Kidron." 2 Chron. xxxiv, 3, 4 ; 2 Kings xxiii, 7-12. Yet by the time that Zedekiah reigned, there was again a serious lapse not only into certain forms of sun worship, but into the open worship of the literal sun. Ezekiel was among the captives in Babylonia, and by the Spirit of God he was taken in a vision to Jerusalem, and was caused to see the abominations that were being practiced there. First, he was caused to see the image of Jealousy in the very entry way to the altar of sacrifice, before the house of the Lord. He was told to turn, and he would see greater abominations than this. He then saw, " and behold every form of creep- ing things, and abominable beasts, and all the idols of the house of Israel, portrayed upon the wall round about. And there stood before them seventy men of the ancients of the bouse of Israel, and in the midst of them stood Jaazaniah 196 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. the son of Shaphan, with every man his censer in his hand ; and a thick cloud of incense went up." Again he was told to turn, and he would see yet greater abominations than this that they were doing. He was then brought "to the door of the gate of the Lord's house which was toward the north ; and, behold, there sat women weep- ing for Tammuz. " And he was told to turn yet again, and he should see greater abominations even than this. ' ' And he brought me into the inner court of the Lord's house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs to- ward the temple of the Lord, and their faces toward the east, and they worshiped the sun toward the east. " Eze. viii, 16. All that is meant in this we cannot tell ; but this much is certain, that, in the estimate of Jehovah, as bad as was the worship of Astarte, and however much it provoked to jealousy ; as bad as was the worship of all manner of abominable beasts ; as bad as was the worship of Tammuz ; yet worse than all these, even though in them were embod- ied some forms of sun worship more abominable than all these was the setting of the face toward the east, in the worship of the sun itself. This was to turn the hack upon the Lord; to leave him and his worship behind ; and, in worshiping the visible sun, to choose all that was included in all the forms of its worship that might be known. This was open apostasy the renunciation of all that was good and the acceptance of all that was bad. Now, aside from the lascivious rites of Bacchus and Her- cules, and beyond the fearful orgies of Cybele, this very form of worship prevailed in the Roman empire. The wor- ship of the sun itself was the principal worship of the Rom- ans in the time of Constantine. The sun, as represented in Apollo, was the chief and patron divinity recognized by Augustus. "Apollo was the patron of the spot which had WEEPING FOR TAMMUZ. ASHERES (GROVES). SUN WORSHIP OF AUGUSTUS AND ELAOABALUS. 1<)~ given a name to his great victory of Actium ; Apollo him- self, it was proclaimed, had fought for Rome and for Octavius on that auspicious day ; the same Apollo, the sun- god, had shuddered in his bright career at the murder of the dictator, and had terrified the nations by the eclipse of his divine countenance. . . . Besides building a splendid temple to Apollo on the Palatine Hill, the emperor sought to honor him by transplanting to the Circus Maximus, the sports of which were under his special protection, an obelisk from Heliopolis [city of the sun] in Egypt. This flame- shaped column was a symbol of the sun, and originally bore a blazing orb upon its summit." Merivale. 11 To Sol Deus inmctus the sun, the unconquerable god were attributed the world-wide conquests of the Roman power. The greatest and most magnificent temple that ever was built on earth, except only that built by Solomon, was erected by Antoninus Pius, emperor of Rome, at Baalbek, in honor of the visible shining sun. But it was in Elagabalus that the worship of the sun received its strongest imperial impetus. The way that he became emperor was this : The emperor Caracalla was murdered near Antioch, March 8, A. D. 217, and there Macrinus became emperor in his stead. Caracalla's mother committed suicide shortly afterward, and then Macrinus commanded Julia Maesa, her sister, to leave Antioch with her family. She went to Emesa where a considerable body of troops was stationed, and where was a temple of the sun which the troops frequented in their worship. Julia's grand- son, Bassianus, was made high-priest of the sun in this temple. In this young man the troops " recognized, or thought they recognized, the features of Caracalla." Julia took particular pains, by the careful distribution of money, to deepen this impression, and May 16, 218, he was declared emperor by the troops at Emesa. He asserted his hereditary right to the office because of his relationship to Caracalla. 14 "Romans Under the Empire," chap, xxxiii, par. 13. 18 198 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. The rebellion rapidly spread among the troops throughout the province. Officers who tried to check it were murdered, and the power of young Bassianus daily grew. Macrinus assembled his troops, and left Antioch to quell the insurrection. A battle was fought, and Macrinus was slain, thus ending a reign of eighty-seven days, and Bassia- ims became emperor in fact, June 7, A. D. 218. He assumed the name of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, and sent letters to the Senate announcing his accession to the empire in the place of Macrinus. Not being ready just then to go to Rome personally, he sent a picture of himself which he commanded to be placed in the Senate house over the altar of victory. "He was drawn in his sacerdotal robes of silk and gold, after the loose flowing fashion of the Medes and Phenicians ; his head was covered with a lofty tiara, his numerous collars and bracelets were adorned with gems of an inestimable value. His eyebrows were tinged with black, and his cheeks painted with an artificial red and white." Gibbon. The name under which the sun was worshiped at Einesa, where Bassiauus was high-priest, was Elagabalus. His acces- sion to the office of emperor he attributed to the favor of this sun-god. Therefore as emperor he assumed the name of Elagabalus as greater and more honorable than any that might be derived from any other source, and by this name alone is he known in history. When he went to Rome, the "black conical stone " from Emesa, the symbol of the functions of the sun, was taken with him. and as he moved " in a solemn procession through the streets of Rome, the way was strewed with gold dust ; the black stone, set in precious gems, was placed on a chariot drawn by six milk-white horses richly caparisoned. The pious emperor held the reins, and supported by his ministers, moved slowly backwards, that he might perpetually enjoy the felicity of the divine presence. In a magnificent temple 15 " Decline and Fall," chap, vi, par. 22. ELACiABALUS. AVREfJAN'8 TEMPLE TO THE SUN. 199 raised on the Palatine Mount, the sacrifices of the god Ela- gabalus were celebrated with every circumstance of cost and solemnity. The richest wines, the most extraordinary victims, and the rarest aromatics, were profusely consumed on his altar. Around the altar a chorus of Syrian damsels performed their lascivious dances to the sound of barbarian music. " Gibbon. 16 It was in perfect harmony with the rites of sun worship everywhere that all the laws of nature and decency should "be violated and subverted by Elagabalus ; that he should have a long train of concubines, and a rapid succession of wives ; that a vestal virgin should be taken by force from her sacred retreat to feed his passion ; and that he should put on the dress, and play the part, of a woman, while he publicly assigned to another the title and the place of hus- band to himself. All these things belonged with the worship of the sun, and all this Elagabalus did, not as emperor, but as imperial high-priest and representative of the sun. As emperor and high-priest of the sun, it was his chief purpose, and "it was openly asserted, that the worship of the sun, under his name of Elagabalus, was to supercede all other worship. " Milman . " As soon as Aurelian became emperor, March, A. D. 270, he began the erection of a temple in- Rome in honor of the sun. In A. D. 272 he made an expedition against Zenobia, who had established her authority in the East with her capital at Baalbek. When he had overthrown her power and captured her capital city, he left an officer with a garri- son of troops to govern the city while he returned to Europe. The people^ arose and murdered the governor and his sol- diers. Aurelian returned and gave up the people to indis- criminate massacre, and made of the city itself a heap of ruins. The only attempt he made to repair it was to restore the temple of the sun, which Antoninus had built. When he returned to Koine in A. D. 274, he celebrated a triumph, 16 Id., par. 23. " " History of Christianity," book ii, chap, viii, par. 22. 200 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. which, in magnificence and the abundance of treasures, was second to none that Rome had ever seen. At this time also he dedicated his magnificent temple to the sun. "A considerable portion of his oriental spoils was con- secrated to the gods of Rome ; the Capitol, and every other temple, glittered with the offerings of his ostentatious piety ; and the temple of the sun alone received above fifteen thou- sand pounds of gold. This last was a magnificent structure, erected by the emperor on the side of the Quirinal Hill, and dedicated soon after the triumph, to that deity whom Aure- lian adored as the parent of his life and fortunes. His mother had been an inferior priestess in a chapel of the sun ; a peculiar devotion to the god of light, was a sentiment which the fortunate peasant imbibed in his infancy ; and every step of his elevation, every victory of his reign, forti- fied superstition by gratitude." Gribbon. The immediate predecessor of the emperor Diocletian died on his way from Persia to Europe. The fact of his death was concealed from the army for a time, which gave rise to a strong suspicion that he had been murdered. When Diocletian was chosen emperor, he therefore deemed it necessary to purge himself of all suspicion by a means which would prove satisfactory to all. He did it by a solemn oath in the face of the sun. "Conscious that the station which he had filled, exposed him to some suspicions, Diocletian ascended the tribunal, and raising his eyes towards the sun, made a solemn profession of his own inno- cence, in the presence of that all-seeing deity. "- (ribbon. 19 And it was the oracle of the sun Apollo at Miletus, which he consulted before he issued the decree of persecu- tion, to which he was so strongly urged by Galerius, w r ho was prompted by his mother, a fanatical worshiper of Cybele. But it was in Constantine that, after Elagabalus, the sun found its most worshipful devotee. As emperor of Rome 18 "Decline and Fall," chap, xi, par. 43. 19 /d., chap, xii, par. 41. CONSTANTINE A WORSHIPER OF THE SUN. 201 he had to show some deference to the other gods, and there- fore on the medals which were issued in honor of his vic- tories, there were the figures of Jupiter and MarS, as well as of Hercules and Apollo. Up to the period of his war with Maxentius, A. D. 812, "all that we know of Constantine's religion would imply that he was outwardly, and even zeal- ously, pagan. In a public oration, his panegyrist extols the magnificence of his offerings to the gods. His victorious presence was not merely expected to restore more than their former splendor to the Gaulish cities ruined by barbaric incursions, but sumptuous temples were to arise at his bid- ding, to propitiate the deities, particularly Apollo, his tute- lary god. The medals struck for these victories are covered with the symbols of paganism. Eusebius himself admits that Constantino was at this time in doubt which religion he should embrace. " Oilman. 20 Thus as emperor, and to satisfy the prejudices of the people, some respectful deference was shown to other gods, but "the devotion of Constantine was more peculiarly directed to the genius of the sun, the Apollo of Greek and Roman mythology ; and he was pleased to be represented with the symbols of the god of light and poetry. The unerring shafts of that deity, the brightness of his eyes, his laurel wreath, immortal beauty, and elegant accomplish- ments, seemed to point him out as the patron of a young hero. The altars of Apollo were crowned with the votive offerings of Constantine ; and the credulous multitude were taught to believe that the emperor was permitted to behold with mortal eyes the visible majesty of their tutelar deity ; and that, either waking or in a vision, he was blessed with the auspicious omens of a long and victorious reign. The sun was universally celebrated as the invincible guide and protector of Constantine." (ribbon.* 1 In the time of Constantine, and in Constantine himself, ao " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 36. 21 "Decline and Fall," chap, xx, par. 3. 202 ANCIENT SUN WORSHIP. the worship of the sun occupied the imperial seat, and was the imperial religion of Home. It will be necessary in another chapter to trace the same thing among the people of the empire. THE SUN. CHAPTER VIII. THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. . WHEN Paul was at Thessalonica, he preached to the peo- ple about the second coming of the Lord. After he had gone away, he wrote to them a letter in which he said more about this same event, and in his writing he made it so much of a reality, and his hope was so centered in the event, that apparently he put himself among those who would see the Saviour come, and wrote as though he and others would be alive at that time. He wrote: "For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not pre- vent [go before] them which are asleep. For the Lord him- self shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God : and the dead in Christ shall rise first : then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air ; and so shall we ever be with the Lord." 1 Thess. iv, 15-17. The Thessalonians not bearing in mind what he had told them when he was there, misinterpreted these strong and apparently personal statements, and therefore put into the apostle's words a meaning that he did not intend should be there. Upon this they fell into the mistake of supposing that the second coining of Christ was immediately at hand, and was so near that they could even live without working until he should come. This idea had been worked up quite fully among them by persons pretending to have received [203] 204 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. revelations by the Spirit ; by others pretending that they had received word from Paul to that effect ; and yet others went so far as to write letters to that effect, and forge Paul's name to them. These facts coming to the apostle's knowl- edge, he wrote a second letter to correct the mistakes which, in view of the teaching he had given when he was present with them, they were wholly unwarranted in making. In his second letter Paul did not modify in the least the doctrine that Christ is coming, or that he will then certainly gather his people to himself. There w r as no mistake in the doctrine concerning the fact of his coming. The mistake was in the time when they expected him to come. This is the point which the apostle corrects in his second letter, and writes thus : ' ' Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, that ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means : for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition ; who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped ; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing him- self that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with *you. I told you these things ? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work : only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming." 2 Thess. ii, 1-8. All this he had taught them when he was there with them, and therefore reminded them, in the fifth verse, "Re- member ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things ? " Then, having recalled to their minds the fact, he simply appeals to their knowledge, and says, "And THE ROOT OF THE APOSTASY. 205 now ye know what withholdeth that he [the son of perdi- tion] might be revealed in his time." This plainly sets forth the prophecy of a great falling away or apostasy from the truth of the gospel. ' The purity of the gospel of Christ would be corrupted, and its intent perverted. The falling away of which Paul wrote to the Thessa- lonians, is referred to in his counsel to the elders of the church at Ephesus, whom he called to meet him at Miletus. To them he said : " For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. There- fore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears." Acts xx, 29-31. This warning was not alone to the people of Ephesus in the three years that he was there. It is seen through all his epistles. Because of this readiness of individuals to assert themselves, to get wrong views of the truth, and to speak perverse things, the churches had constantly to be checked, guided, trained, reproved, and rebuked. There were men even in the church who were ever ready to question the authority of the apostles. There were those who made it a business to follow up Paul, and by every possible means to counteract his teaching and destroy his influence. They declared that he was not an apostle of the Lord at all, but of men ; that he had never seen the Lord ; that he was simply a tent maker going about over the country working at his trade, and passing himself off as an apostle. Others charged him with teaching the doctrine that it is right to do evil that good may come. But it was not alone nor chiefly from these characters that the danger threatened. It was those who from among the disciples would arise speaking perverse tMnf/x, of which an instance and a warning are given in the letter to Timo- thy : " Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman 206 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. But shun profane and vain babblings ; for they will increase unto more ungodliness. And their word will eat as doth a canker ; of whom is Hymeireus and Philetus ; who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already ; and overthrow the faith of some." 2 Tim. ii, 15-18. Nor yet was it with such as these that the greatest danger lay. It was from those who would arise not only speaking perverse things, but " speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them." Through error of judgment, a man might speak perverse things with no bad intention ; but the ones here mentioned would speak perverse things purposely and with the intention of making disciples for themselves to draw away disciples after them instead of to draw disci- ples to Christ. These would pervert the truth, and would have to pervert the truth, in order to accomplish their pur- pose. He who always speaks the truth as it is in Jesus, will draw disciples to Jesus and not to himself. To draw to Christ will be his only wish. But when one seeks to draw disciples to himself, and puts himself in the place of Christ, then he must pervert the truth, and accommodate it to the wishes of those whom he hopes to make his own disciples. This is wickedness ; this is apostasy. There was another consideration which made the danger the more imminent. These words were spoken to the bish- ops. It was a company of bishops, to whom the apostle was speaking when he said: "Of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them." From that order of men who were chosen to guide and to care for the church of Christ, from those who were set to protect the church from this order of men there would be those who would pervert their calling, their office, and the purpose of it, to build up themselves, and gather disciples to themselves in the place of Christ. To watch this spirit, to check its influence, and to guard against its HEATHEN RITES ADOPTED. 9Q7 workings, was the constant effort of the apostle ; and for the reason as stated to the Thessalonians, that the mystery of iniquity was already working. There were at that time elements abroad which the apostle could plainly see would develop into all that the Scriptures had announced. And scarcely were the last of the apostles dead when the evil appeared in its practical workings. No sooner were the apostles removed from the stage of action, no sooner was their watchful attention gone, and their apostolic authority removed, than this very thing appeared of which the apostle had spoken. Certain bishops, in order to make easier the conversion of the heathen ; to multiply disciples, and by this increase their own influ- ence and authority ; began to adopt heathen customs and forms. When the canon of Scripture was closed, and the last of the apostles was dead, the first century was gone ; and within twenty years of that time the perversion of the truth of Christ had become widespread. In the history of this century and of this subject the record is, "It is certain that to religious worship, both public and private, many rites were added, without necessity, and to the offense of sober and good men." Moshcim. 1 And the reason of this is stated to be that "The Christians were pronounced atheists, because they were desti- tute of temples, altars, victims, priests, and all that pomp in which the vulgar suppose the essence of religion to consist. For unenlightened persons are prone to estimate religion by what meets their eyes. To silence this accusation, the Christian doctors thought it necessary to introduce some external rites, which would strike the senses of the people, so that they could main tain themselves really to possess all those things of which Christians were charged with being destitute. though under different forms." Mosheim. z 1 " Ecclesiastical History," Century ii, part li, chap. Iv, par. 1, Murdock's translation. 2 Id., par. 3. 208 THE FALLING AWAY THE QREAT APOSTASY. This was at once to accommodate the Christian worship and its forms to that of the heathen, and was almost at one step to heathenize Christianity. No heathen element or form can be connected with Christianity or its worship, and Christianity remain pure. Of all the ceremonies of the heathen, the mysteries were the most sacred and most universally practiced. Some mysteries were in honor of Bacchus, some of Cybele, but the greatest of all, those considered the most sacred of all and the most widely practiced, were the Eleusinian, so called because celebrated at Eleusis in Greece. But what- ever was the mystery that was celebrated, there was always in it as an essential part of it, the elements of abomination that characterized sun worship everywhere, because the mys- teries were simply forms of the W 7 ide-spread and multiform worship of the sun. Among the first of the perversions of the Christian worship was to give to its forms the title and air of the mysteries. For says the record : " Among the Greeks and the people of the East, nothing was held more sacred than what were called the mysteries. This circumstance led the Christians, in order to impart dignity to their religion, to say that they also had similar mysteries, or certain holy rites concealed from the vulgar ; and they not only applied the terms used in the pagan mys- teries to Christian institutions, particularly baptism and the Lord's sapper, but they gradually introduced also the rites which were des- ignated by those terms." Noalicim? That this point may be more fully understood we shall give a sketch of the Eleusinian mysteries. As we have stated, although there were others, these were of such pre- eminence that they acquired the specific name by way of pre-eminence the mysteries. The festival was sacred to Ceres and Proserpine. Everything about it contained a mystery, and was to be kept secret by the initiated. "This mysterious secrecy was solemnly observed and enjoined on all the votaries of the goddess ; and if any one ever appeared at 3 Id., par. 5, 19 THE MYSTERIES. 209 the celebration, either intentionally or through ignorance, without proper introduction, he was immediately punished with death. Persons of both sexes and all ages were ini- tiated at this solemnity, and it was looked upon as so heinous a crime to neglect this sacred part of religion, that it was one of the heaviest accusations which contributed to the con- demnation of Socrates. The initiated were under the more particular care of the deities, and therefore their lives were supposed to be attended with more happiness and real security than those of other men. This benefit was not only granted during life, but it extended beyond the grave, and they were honored with the first places in the Elysian fields, while others were left to wallow in perpetual filth and ignominy. " Anthon. * There were the greater and the lesser mysteries. The greater were the Eleusinian in fact, and the lesser were invented, according to the mythological story, because Her- cules passed near Eleusis, where the greater mysteries were celebrated, and desired to be initiated ; but as he was a stranger and therefore could not lawfully be admitted, a form of mysteries was adopted into which he could be initiated. These were ever afterward celebrated as the lesser, and were observed at Agree. In the course of time the lesser were made preparatory to the greater, and the candidate must be initiated into these before he could be initiated into the greater. "No person could be initiated at Eleusis without a previous purification at Agree. This purification they performed by keeping themselves pure, chaste, and unpolluted during nine days, after which they came and offered sacrifices and prayers, wearing garlands of flowers, and having under their feet Jupiter's skin, which was the skin of a victim offered to that god. The person who assisted was called Iludranos, from kudor, water, which was used at the purification ; and they themselves were called the initiated. A year after the initiation at the * " Classical Dictionary," Eleusinia, 210 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. less mysteries they sacrificed a sow to Ceres, and were admitted into the greater, and the secrets of the festivals were solemnly revealed to them, from which they were called inspectors. "The initiation was performed in the following man- ner : The candidates, crowned with myrtle, were admitted by night into a place called the mystical temple, a vast and stupendous building. As they entered the temple, they purified themselves by washing their hands in holy water, and received for admonition that they were to come with a mind pure and undefiled, without which the cleanliness of the body would be unacceptable. After this the holy mys- teries were read to them from a large book called petroma, because made of two stones, petrai, fitly cemented together ; and then* the priest proposed to them certain questions, to which they readily answered. After this, strange and fear- ful objects presented themselves to their sight ; the place often seemed to quake, and to appear suddenly resplendent with fire, and immediately covered with gloomy darkness and horror." Anthon. 6 After initiation, the celebration lasted nine days. These mysteries, as well as those of Bacchus and others, were directly related to the sun, for "the most, holy and perfect rite in the Eleusinian Mysteries was to show an ear of corn mowed down in silence, aird this was a symbol of the Phrygian Atys. "- " Encyclopedia Eritannica. " ' The Phrygian Atys, as we have before shown, was sim- ply the incarnation of the sun, and the mysteries being a form of sun worship, the "sacred" symbols cannot be de- scribed with decency. Having given in a previous chapter the characteristics of the celebration of the worship of the sun, it is not necessary to describe the actions that were per- formed in the celebration of tho mysteries after the initia- tion, any further than is spoken by the apostle with direct 5 Id. Article " Mysteries." THE FORMS OF SUN WORSHIP ADOPTED. 21 1 reference to this subject. '"Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret." Eph. v, 11, 12. It was to accommodate the Christian worship to the minds of a people who practiced these things that the bishops gave to the Christian ordinances the name of mys- teries. The Lord's supper was made the greater mystery, baptism the lesser and the initiatory rite to the celebration of the former. After the heathen manner also a white gar- ment was used as the initiatory robe, and the candidate having been baptized, and thus initiated into the lesser mysteries, was admitted into what was called in the church the order of catechumens, in which order they remained a certain length of time, as in the heathen celebration, before they were admitted to the celebration of the Lord's supper, the greater mystery. "This practice originated in the Eastern provinces, and then after the time of Adrian (who first introduced the pagan mysteries among the Latins) it spread among the Christians of the West." The reign of Hadrian was from 117-138. Therefore, before the second century was half gone, before the last of the apostles had been dead forty years, this apostasy, this working of the mystery of iniquity, had so largely spread over both the East and the "West, that it is literally true that " a large part, therefore, of the Chris- tian observances and institutions even in this century, had the aspect of the pagan mysteries." MosJieim. 1 Nor is this all. In the previous chapter we have abund- antly shown the worship of the sun to have been universal. These apostates not being content with so much of the sun worship as appeared in the celebration of the mysteries, adopted the heathen custom of worshiping toward the East. So says the history : 7 "Ecclesiastical History," Century ii, part ii, chap, iv, par. 5. 212 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. "Before the coming of Christ, all the Eastern nations performed di- vine worship with their faces turned to that part of the heavens where the sun displays his rising beams. This custom was founded upon a general opinion that God, whose essence they looked upon to be light, and whom they considered as being circumscribed within certain limits, dwelt in that part of the firmament from which he sends forth the sun, the bright image of his benignity and glory. The Christian converts, in- deed, rejected this gross error [of supposing that God dwelt in that part of the firmament] ; but they retained the ancient and universal custom of worshiping toward the east, which sprang from it. Nor is this cus- tom abolished even in our times, but still prevails in a great number of Christian churches. " Moslidm* The next step in addition to this was the adoption of the day of the sun as a festival day. To such an extent were the forms of sun worship practiced in this apostasy, that before the close of the second century the heathen themselves charged these so-called Christians with worship- ing the sun. A presbyter of the church of Carthage, then and now one of the "church Fathers," who wrote about A. D. 200, considered it necessary to make a defense of the practice, which he did to the following effect in an address to the rulers and magistrates of the Roman empire : "Others, again, certainly with more information and greater veri- similitude, believe that the sun is our god. We shall be counted Persians perhaps, though we do not worship the orb of day painted on a piece of linen cloth, having himself everywhere in his own disc. The idea no doubt has originated from our being known to turn to the east in prayer. But you, many of you, also under pretense sometimes of worshiping the heavenly bodies, move your lips in the direction of the sunrise. In the same way, if we devote Sunday to rejoicing, from a far different reason than sun worship, we have some resemblance to those of you who devote the day of Saturn to ease and luxury, though they too go far away from Jewish ways, of which indeed they are ignorant." Ter- tuttian. 9 And again in an address to all the heathen he justifies this practice by the argument, in effect, You do the same 8 Jd., par. 7, Maclaine's translation. 9 " Apology," chap. xvl. ROME EXALTS SUNDAY. 213 thing, you originated it too, therefore you have no right to blame us. In his own words his defense is as follows : "Others, with greater regard to good manners, it must be confessed, suppose that the sun is the god of the Christians, because it is a well- known fact that we pray towards the east, or because we make Sunday a day of festivity. What then ? Do you do less than this ? Do not many among you, with an affectation of sometimes worshiping the heav- enly bodies, likewise move your lips in the direction of the sunrise ? It is you, at all events, who have admitted the sun into the calendar of the week ; and you have selected its day, in preference to the preceding day, as the most suitable in the week for either an entire abstinence from the bath, or for its postponement until the evening, or for taking rest and banqueting." Tertullian. 10 This accommodation was easily made, and all this practice was easily justified, by the perverse-minded teachers, in the perversion of such scriptures as, " The Lord God is a sun and shield " (Ps. Ixxxiv, 11) ; and, "Unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings." Mai. iv, 2. As this custom spread and through it such disciples were multiplied, the ambition of the bishop of Rome grew apace. It was in honor of the day of the sun that there was mani- fested the first attempt of the bishop of Rome to compel the obedience of all other bishops, and the fact that this attempt was made in such a cause, at the very time when these pre- tended Christians were openly accused by the heathen with worshiping the sun, is strongly suggestive. From Rome there came now another addition to the sun- worshiping apostasy. The first Christians being mostly Jews, continued to celebrate the passover in remembrance of the death of Christ, the true passover ; and this was con- tinued among those who from among the Gentiles had turned to Christ. Accordingly the celebration was always on the passover day the fourteenth of the first month. Rome, 10 "Ad Nationes," book i, chap. xiii. 214 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. however, and from her all the West, adopted the day of the sun as the day of this celebration. According to the Eastern custom, the celebration, being on the fourteenth day of the month, would of course fall on different days of the week as the years revolved. The rule of Rome was that the cele- bration must always be on a Sunday the Sunday nearest to the fourteenth day of the first month of the Jewish year. And if the fourteenth day of that month should itself be a Sunday, then the celebration was not to be held on that day, but upon the next Sunday. One reason of this was not only to be as like the heathen as possible, but to be as unlike the Jews as possible : this, in order not only to facilitate the "conversion" of the heathen by conforming to their cus- toms, but also by pandering to their spirit of contempt and hatred of the Jews. It was upon this point that the bishop of Rome made his first open attempt at absolutism. We know not precisely when this began, but it was prac- ticed in Rome as early as the time of Sixtus I, who was bishop of Rome A. D. 119-128. The practice was promoted by his successors, and Anicetus, who was bishop of Rome A. D. 157-168, "would neither conform to that- [Eastern] custom himself, nor suffer any under his jurisdiction to con- form to it, obliging them to celebrate that solemnity on the Sunday next following the fourteenth of the moon." Bower}* In A. D. 100, Polycarp, bishop of Ephesus, made a journey to Rome to consult with Anicetus about this ques- tion, though nothing special came of the consultation. Victor, who was bishop of Rome A. D. 192-202, likewise proposed to oblige only those under his jurisdiction to conform to the practice of Rome ; but he asserted jurisdiction over all, and therefore presumed to command all. "Accordingly, after having taken the advice of some foreign bishops, he wrote an imperious letter to the Asiatic prelates commanding them to imitate the example of the 11 " History of the Popes," under " Pius " and " Anicetus." HEATHEN PHILOSOPHY ADOPTED. 215 Western Christians with respect to the time of celebrating the festival of Easter. The Asiatics answered this lordly requisition by the pen of Polycrates, bishop of Ephesus, who declared in their name, with great spirit and resolution, that they would by no means depart, in this manner, from the custom handed down to them by their ancestors. Upon this the thunder of excommunication began to roar. Victor, exasperated by this resolute answer of the Asiatic bishops, broke communion with them, pronounced them unworthy of the name of his brethren, and excluded them from all fel- lowship with the church of Rome." Mosheim. In view of these things it will readily be seen that be- tween paganism and this kind of Christianity it soon became difficult to distinguish, arid the third century only went to make any distinction still more difficult to be discerned. In the latter part of the second century, there sprang up in Egypt a school of pagan philosophy called the "Eclec- tic." The patrons of this school called themselves "Eclec- tics " because they professed to be in search of truth alone, and to be ready to adopt any tenet of any system in exist- ence which seemed to them to be agreeable to their ideas of truth. They held Plato to be the one person above all others who had attained the nearest to truth in the greatest number of points. Hence they were also called "Plato- nists." "This philosophy was adopted by such of the learned at Alexandria, as wished to be accounted Christians, and yet to retain the name, the garb, and the rank of philosophers. In particular, all those who in this century presided in the schools of the Christians at Alexandria, Athenagoras, Pan- trenus, and Clemens Alexandrinus, are said to have approved of it. These men were persuaded that true philosophy, the M " Ecclesiastical History," Century ii, part ii, chap, iv, par. 11, Maclaine's translation. 216 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. great and most salutary gift of God, lay in scattered frag- ments among all the sects of philosophers ; and therefore, that it was the duty of every wise man, and especially of a Christian teacher, to collect those fragments from all quar- ters, and to use them for the defense of religion and the confutation of impiety. Yet this selection of opinions did not prevent them from regarding Plato as wiser than all the rest, and as especially remarkable for treating the Deity, the soul, and things remote from sense, so as to suit the Chris- tian scheme." Mosheim. In the end of the second century, and especially in the first forty-one years of the third, there flourished in Alex- andria one of these would-be-philosophers Ammonius Saccas by name who gave a turn to the philosophy of the Eclectics, which caused his sect to be called the New Pla- tonists. The difference between the Eclectic and the system founded by Ammonius was this : The Eclectics held, as above stated, that in every system of thought in the world there was some truth, but mixed with error, their task being to select from all systems that portion of truth which was in each, and from all these to form one harmonious system. Ammonius held that when the truth was known, all sects had the same identical system of truth ; that the differences among them were caused simply by the different ways of stating that truth ; and that the proper task of the philoso- pher was to find such a means of stating the truth that all should be able to understand it, and so each one understand all the others. This was to be accomplished by a system of allegorizing and mystification, by which anybody could get whatever he wanted out of any writing that might come to his notice. One of the earliest attache's to this philosophy from among those who professed to be Christians, was Clem- ent of Alexandria, who became the head of that kind 13 Id., chap, i, par. 0, Murdoch's translation. CLEMENT'S PHILOSOPHIC MYSTICISM. 217 of school at Alexandria. These philosophers "believed the language of Scripture to contain two meanings ; the one obvious, and corresponding with the direct import of the words ; the other recondite, and concealed under the words, like a nut by the shell. The former they neglected, as of little value, their study chiefly being to extract the latter : in other words, they were more intent on throwing obscurity over the sacred writings, by the fictions of their own imaginations, than on searching out their true meanings. Some also, and this is stated especially of Clement, accommo- dated the divine oracles to the precepts of philosophy." Jtfosheim. " The following highly edifying explanation by Clement, of the Scripture relating to the fish which Peter caught, will illustrate this system of interpretation : "That flsli then which, at the command of the Lord, Peter caught, points to digestible and God-given and moderate food. And by those who rise from the water to the bait of righteousness, he admonishes us to take away luxury and avarice, as the coin from the fish ; in order that he might displace vainglory ; and by giving the stater to the taxgatherers, and 'rendering to Caesar the things which are Caesar's,' might preserve 'to God the things which are God's.' The stater is capable of other explanations not unknown to us, but the present is not a suitable occa- sion for their treatment. Let the mention we make for our present pur- pose suffice, as it is not unsuitable to the flowers of the Word ; and we have often done this, drawing to the urgent point of the question the most beneficial fountain, in order to water those who have been planted by the Word." 15 And this, of the Saviour's miracle of turning the water into wine, also helps to an understanding of the excellent wisdom of this philosophy : " He gave life to the watery element of the meaning of the law, fill- ing with his blood the doer of it who is of Adam, that is, the whole world ; supplying piety with drink from the vine of truth, the mixture of the old law and of the new word, in order to the fulfillment of the predestined time." 1(> 14 7d., chap, iii, par. 5. 16 "The Instructor," book ii, chap. I. 16 Id. chap. i. 218 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. Of the benefits children will derive from a starvation diet, he gives this valuable instruction : - " They say that the bodies of children, when shooting up to their height, are made to grow right by deficiency in nourishment. For then the spirit, which pervades the body in order to its growth, is not checked by abundance of food obstructing the freedom of its course." 17 The close resemblance between the pagan philosophy and that of the New Platonists is illustrated by the fact that but one of the classes concerned could tell to which of them Ammonius Saccas belonged. The pagans generally re- garded him a pagan. His own kind of Christians counted him a good Christian all his life. The genuine Christians all knew that he was a pagan, and that the truth of the whole matter was that he was a pretended Christian "who adopted with such dexterity the doctrines of the pagan phi- losophy, as to appear a Christian to the Christians, and a pagan to the pagans." He died A. D. 211. Clement is supposed to have died about A. n. 220, and the fame and influence which he had acquired and it was considerable was far outshone by Origen, who had been taught by both Clement and Ammonius. Origen imbibed all the allegorical and mystifying processes of both Ammo- nius and Clement, and multiplied upon them from his own wild imagination. He was not content with finding two meanings in the Scriptures as those before him, but took the secondary sense, the hidden meaning, and added to it four additional meanings of his own. His system then stood thus : First, All scripture contains two meanings, the lit- eral and the hidden. Second, This hidden sense has within itself two meanings, the moral and the mystical. Ttiird, The mystical has within it yet two other meanings, the alle- gorical and the anagogical. According to this method of 17 Id., chap. i. 18 Note to Mosheim's " Ecclesiastical History," Century ii, part ii, chap, i, par. 7, Madame's translation. ORIOEN'S PHILOSOPHIC MYSTICISM. 219 mysticism, therefore, in every passage of Scripture there are at least three meanings, and there may be any number from three to six. His explanation of it is this : First, Man is composed of three parts, a rational mind, a sensitive soul, and a visible body. The Scriptures resemble man, and therefore have a three-fold sense ; () a literal sense which corresponds to the body ; (ty a moral sense corresponding to the soul ; and (c) a mystical sense which corresponds to the mind. Second, As the body is the baser part of man, so the literal is the baser sense of Scripture ; and as the body often betrays good men into sin, so the literal sense of Scripture often leads into error. Therefore, those who would see more in the Scripture than common people could see, must search out this hidden meaning, and yet further must search in that hidden meaning for the moral sense. And those who would be perfect must carry their search yet farther, and beyond this moral sense which they found in the hidden meaning they must find the mystical sense, with its additional train of allegorical and anagogical senses. As in this system of philosophy the body of man was a clog to the soul and hindered it in its heavenly aspirations, and was therefore to be despised, and by punishment and starvation was to be separated as far as possible from the soul, it followed that the literal sense of Scripture, which corresponded to man's body likewise, was a hinderance to the proper understanding of all the hidden meanings of the Scripture, and was to be despised and separated as far as possible from the hidden sense, and counted of the least possible worth. Accordingly, one of the first principles of this teaching was the following : "The source of many evils lies in adhering to the carnal or external part of Scripture. Those who do so will not attain to the kingdom of God. Let us therefore seek after the spirit and substantial fruit of the word, which are hidden and mysterious." Origeti. 19 Quoted in Maclainc's Moshcim, Century iii, part il, chap, iii, par. 5, iiote. 220 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. And the next step was but the logical result of this ; namely : " The Scriptures are of little use to those who understand them as they are written." Origen. 20 By such a system as this it is evident that any one could find whatever he pleased in any passage of Scripture, and that the Scripture could be made to support any doctrine that was ever invented by the wildest fancy of the veriest fanatic. Even though the doctrine might be flatly contra- dictory to the Scripture, the Scripture could be made fully to agree with and teach the doctrine. From this sketch of Platonism as held by Origen, the essential truth of the following passag'e will be readily seen : "This new species of philosophy, imprudently adopted by Origen and other Christians, did immense harm to Christianity. For it led the teachers of it to involve in philosophic obscurity many parts of our religion, which were in themselves plain and easy to be understood ; and to add to the precepts of the Saviour no few things, of which not a word can be found in the Holy Scriptures. ... It recommended to Christians various foolish and useless rites, suited only to nourish superstition, no small part of which we see religiously observed by many even to the present day. And finally it alienated the minds of many, in the follow- ing centuries, from Christianity itself, and produced a heterogeneous species of religion, consisting" of Christian and Platonic principles com- bined. " Mosheim. zl On the part of real Christians, those who loved the truth as it is in Christ, there was strong opposition from the 20 Id. With such a system as this for a basis, it is logical enough that the Catholic Church should forbid the common people to read the Scriptures. For Origen is one of the chiefest fathers of the Catholic Church; and "from the days of Origen to those of Chrysostom, there was not a single eminent com- mentator who did not borrow largely from the works of" Origen. "He was the chief teacher of even the most orthodox of the Western Fathers." Far- Tar's "History of Interpretation," last paragraph under "Origen." 21 Id., Century ii, part ii, chap, i, par. 12, Murdock's translation. IMPERIAL AIMS AT RELIGIOUS UNITY. 221 first to this whole system of philosophy with its mystification and allegory. u But the friends of philosophy and litera- ture gradually acquired the ascendency. To this issue Ori- gen contributed very much ; who, having early imbibed the principles of the New Platonism, inauspiciously applied them to theology, and earnestly recommended them to the numerous youth who attended on his instructions. And the greater the influence of this man, which quickly spread over the whole Christian world, the more readily was his method of explaining the sacred doctrines propagated." Mosheim. While this effort was being made on the side of phil- osophy to unite all religions, there was at the same time a like effort on the side of politics. This was the aim of Elagabalus, A. D. 218 to 222. We have already shown that it was the ambition of Elagabalus to make the worship of the sun supersede all other worship in Rome. It is further related of him that a more ambitious scheme even than this was in the emperor's mind, which was nothing less than the blending of all religions into one, of which "the sun was to be the central object of adoration." Mil-man. But the elements were not yet fully prepared for such a fusion. Also the shortness of the reign of Elagabalus prevented any decided advancement toward success. Alexander Severus A. D. 222 to 225 held to the same idea, and carried it into effect so far as his individual prac- tice was concerned. " The mother of Alexander Severus, the able, perhaps crafty and rapacious, Mammsea, had at least held intercourse with the Christians of Syria. She had conversed with the celebrated Or!gen, and listened to his exhortations, if without conversion, still not without respect. Alexander, though he had neither the religious education, the pontifical character, nor the dissolute manners of his 22 JcZ., Century iii, part ii, chap, i, par. 5. 23 " History of Christianity," book ii, chap viii, par. 22. 222 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. predecessor, was a Syrian, with no hereditary attachment to the Roman form of paganism. He seems to have affected a kind of universalism : he paid decent respect to the gods of the capitol ; he held in honor the Egyptian worship, and en- larged the temples of Isis and Serapis. In his own palace, with respectful indifference, he enshrined, as it were, as his household deities, the representatives of the different relig- ions or theo-philosophic systems which were prevalent in the Roman empire, Orpheus, Abraham, Christ, arid Apollo- nius of Tyana. . . . Tlie homage of Alexander Severus may Ije a fair test of the general sentiment of tlie more intelligent heathen of his time." Milman, u His reign' was also too short to accomplish anything beyond his own individual example. But the same tendency went rapidly forward. On the side of philosophy and the apostasy, the progress was continuous and rapid. About the midd]e of this cent- ury, Origen and Celsus, a pagan philosopher, held a pro- tracted discussion upon the respective merits of the pagan and the Christian philosophy. And the standing of the two systems at this time, is well described in the following state- ment : "Heathenism, as interpreted by philosophy, almost found favor with some of the more moderate Christian apologists. . . . The Christians endeavored to enlist the earlier philosophers in their cause ; they were scarcely content with asserting that the nobler Grecian philosophy might be designed to prepare the human mind for the reception of Christianity ; they were almost inclined to endow these sages with a kind of prophetic foreknowledge of its more mysterious doctrines. 'I have explained,' says the Christian in Minucius Felft, ' the opinions of almost all the phi- losophers, whose most illustrious glory it is that they have worshiped one God, though under various names ; so that one might suppose either that the Christians of the present day are philosophers, or that the phi- losophers of old were already Christians.' "These advances on the part of Christianity were more than met by paganism. The heathen religion, which prevailed at least among the 21 Id., book ii, chap, viii, par. 24. PAGANISM AND THE APOSTASY ALIKE. 223 more enlightened pagans during this period, . . . was almost as different from that of the older Greeks and Romans, or even that which prevailed at the commencement of the empire, as it was from Christianity. . . . On the great elementary principle of Christianity, the unity of the supreme God, this approximation had long been silently made. Celsus, in his celebrated controversy with Origen, asserts that this philosoph- ical notion of the Deity is perfectly reconcilable with paganism." The emperor Decius, having no sympathy with any re- ligion, philosophy, or morality, but that of the old original Roman, did his best to restore it throughout the empire. Hence the persecution, as described in Chapter IY of this book. Valerian followed closely the course marked out by Decius ; but in the forty years of peace to religion, from the edict of toleration by Gallienus to the edict of persecution by Diocletian, all these elements worked steadily forward in the same general direction. Of the progress of the apostasy during this time, we have a powerful illustration in the practice of Gregory Thaumaturgus, the "wonder- worker. " Gregory was a pupil and a convert of Origen's. Origen strongly urged him "to devote his acquirements in heathen science and learning, to the elucidation of the Scriptures." When he left Origen's school at Alexandria, he returned to Pontus, and became bishop of Neo Caesarea, A. D. 240 to 270, and how fully he followed the advice of Origen is shown by the following : " ' When Gregory perceived that the ignorant multitude persisted in their idolatry, on account of the pleasures and sensual gratifications which they enjoyed at the pagan festivals, he granted them a permis- sion to indulge themselves in the like pleasures, in celebrating the memory of the holy martyrs, hoping that, in process of time, they would return of their own accord, to a more virtuous and regular course of life.' There is no sort of doubt that, by this permission, Gregory allowed the Christians to dance, sport, and feast at the tombs of the martyrs, upon their respective festivals, and to do everything > /<*., par. 38. 20 224 THE FALLING AWAY THE ORE AT APOSTASY. which the pagans were accustomed to in their temples, during the feasts celebrated in honor of their gods." Moslieim. Neo Csesarea was one of the most important cities in Pontus. Yet so diligently did Gregory thus employ the tal- ents committed to him by Origen, that it is related of him that whereas ' ' there were said to be only seventeen Chris- tians in the whole city when he first entered it as bishop, there were said to be only seventeen pagans in it at the time of his death." 27 It is manifest, however, from Gregory's practice, that those who were by him brought to the Chris- tian name were as much pagan as before except in the mere matter of the name. In the time of Diocletian, that which was known as paganism was so far different from the original paganism of Rome that Milman plainly designates it as the "new pa- ganism." This new paganism was so little removed from the apostate form of Christianity which we have traced, as really to differ from it only in name. The standing of the two systems at the accession of Diocletian is thus described : "Among the cares of his administration, he by no means neglected the purification of the ancient religions. In paganism itself, that silent but manifest change of which we have already noticed the commence- ment, had been creeping on. . . . This new paganism, as has been observed, arose out of the alliance of the philosophy and the religion of the old world. These once implacable adversaries had reconciled their differences, and coalesced against the common enemy. Chris- tianity itself had no slight influence upon the formation of the new system ; and now an Eastern element, more and more strongly dominant, mingled with the whole, and lent it, as it were, a visible object of wor- ship. From Christianity, the new paganism had adopted the unity of the Deity, and scrupled not to degrade all the gods of the older world into subordinate demons or ministers. The Christians had incautiously 26 "Ecclesiastical History," Century ii, part ii, chap, iv, par. 2, note. Mac- laine's translation. 87 " Ante-Nicene Library," Gregory Thaumaturgus, introduction, par. 1, THE TWO STREAMS UNITE IN CONSTANTINE. 225 held the same language : both concurred in the name of demons ; but the pagans used the term in the Platonic sense, as good but subordinate spirits, while the same term spoke to the Christian ear as expressive of malignant and diabolic agency. But the Jupiter Optimus Maximus was not the great Supreme of the new system. The universal deity of the East, the sun, to the philosophic teas the emblem or representative ; to the vulgar, the Deity. Diocletian himself, though he paid so much def- erence to the older faith as to assume the title of Jovius, as belonging to the lord of the world, yet, on his accession, when he would exculpate himself from all concern in the murder of his predecessor, Numerian, appealed in the face of the army to the all-seeing deity of the sun. It is the oracle of Apollo of Miletus, consulted by the hesitating emperor, which is to decide the fate of Christianity. The metaphorical language of Christianity had unconsciously lent strength to this new adversary ; and, in adoring the visible orb, some, no doubt, supposed that they were not de- parting far from the worship of the ' Sun of Righteousness.' " Milman. zs Diocletian himself really contemplated the same fusion of all religions into one, with the sun as the one great universal deity, which Elagabalus had contemplated in his day ; but by Galerius and the leading philosopher of the new paganism, he was persuaded to use all the power of the State in the effort to make paganism alone supreme over and against every form and every profession of the Christian name. The result, however, was as already related, that Galerius was compelled to issue a public edict confessing his failure. Then came Constantine, the best imperial representative of the new paganism, and the most devout worshiper of the sun as the supreme and universal deity, with the avowed purpose, as expressed in his own words, " First to bring the diverse judgments formed by all nations respecting the Deity to a condition, as it were, of settled uniformity." In Constantine the new paganism met its ideal and the New Platonism the apostate, paganized, sun-worshiping form of Christianity met its long-wished-for instrument. In him the two streams met. In him the aspiration of Elaga- 28 " History of Christianity," book ii, chap, ix, par. 7. 226 THE FALLING AWAY THE GREAT APOSTASY. balus, the hope of Ammonius Saccas and Origen, and the ambition of the perverse-minded, self-exalted bishops, were all realized and accomplished a new, imperial, and uni- versal religion was created. Therefore, "The reign of Constantine the Great forms one of the epochs in the history of the world. It is the era of the dissolution of the Roman empire ; the commencement, or rather consoli- dation, of a kind of Eastern despotism, with a new capital, a new patriciate, a new constitution, a new financial system, a new, though as yet imperfect, jurisprudence, and, finally, a new religion." Milman. The epoch thus formed was the epoch of the papacy ; and the new religion thus created was the PAPAL RELIGION. 29 Id., book iii, chap, i, par. 1. CHAPTER IX. THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. 'TVHE Scripture was fulfilled ; there had come a falling L away. But that there should come a falling away, was not all of the story through that falling away there was to be revealed "that man of sin," " the son of perdition," "the mystery of iniquity," "that wicked," who would oppose and exalt himself above all that is called God or that is wor- shiped ; and who, when he did appear, would continue even till that great and notable event the second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. Referring again to the scripture quoted from 2 Thessalo- nians ii, 2, at the beginning of the previous chapter, it is seen that self-exaltation is the spring of the development of this power. As that scripture expresses it, ' ' He opposeth and exalteth himself." As another scripture gives it, "He shall magnify himself in his heart." And another, " He magnified himself even to the prince of the host " the Lord Jesus Christ. And yet another, "He shall also stand up against the Prince of princes." That is, he shall reign, or assert authority above, and in opposition to, the authority of Christ ; or, as the thought is developed by Paul, this power would oppose and exalt itself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he as God sitteth in the temple the place of worship of God, showing himself that he is God. Referring also again to the instruction of Paul to the elders who met him at Miletus, there is seen a prophecy of [227] 228 THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. this same spirit of self-exaltation, a wish to gain disciples to themselves instead of to Christ. They would prefer themselves to Christ, thus at once putting themselves above him, in opposition to him. And this would be developed from among the bishops. " Of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. " This spirit was actively manifested in opposition to the apostle John while he was yet alive, for he says : "I wrote unto the church ; but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the pre-eminence among them, receiveth us not. " 3 John 9. This assertion of pre-eminence was shown in prating against the apostle with malicious words, and not only re- jecting him, but casting out of the church those members who would receive him. It was but a little while after the living authority of the apostles was gone, before this was carried to yet further extremes. According to the word of Christ, there is no such thing as pre-eminence, or mastership, or sovereignty of position, among men in the church. There was once an argument among his disciples as to who should be counted the greatest, and Jesus called them unto him and said : "Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them ; and their great ones exercise authority upon them. But so shall it not be among you : but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister : and whosoever among you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all. For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many." Mark x, 42-45. And in warning his disciples of all times against the prac- tice of the scribes and Pharisees of that time, who were but the popes of their day, he says they "love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. But be not ye called Rabbi : for one is your master, "ALL Ytf ARE BRETHREN." 229 even Christ ; and all ye are brethren. . . . Neither be ye called masters : for one is your master, even Christ. But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. And who- soever shall exalt himself shall be abased ; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted." Matt, xxiii, 6-12. With these instructions the apostles went forth under the great commission of Christ, preaching everywhere that with the Lord there is no respect of persons, but that all are equal before God. There is neither lordship nor over-lordship among men in the church of Christ ; but all are brethren. Christ only is the head of the church, and the head of every man in the church. In the church each member has the same rights as any other member ; but for the good of all and the mutual bene- fit of all concerned, as well as better to carry on his work in the world, the Lord has established his church, and with it a system of church order in which certain ones are chosen to exercise certain functions for the mutual benefit of all in the organization. These officers are chosen from among the membership by the voice of the membership. Of these of- ficers there are two classes, and two only, bishops and deacons. This is shown by Paul's letter to the Philippians "Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ, to all the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons." Chap, i, 1. Bishops are sometimes called elders ; but the same office is always signified. When Paul gave directions to Titus in this matter, he said : "For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thec : if any be blameless. . . . For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God." Titus i, 5-7. This is further shown in Acts xx, to which we have before referred ; when Paul had called unto him to Miletus "the elders of the church" of Ephesus, among other things he said to them : ' ' Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and 230 THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, " episkopoi bishops. Peter also writes to the same effect : ' ' The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that 'shall be revealed : Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but will- ingly ; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind ; neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." 1 Peter v, 1-3. This text not only shows that the terms ' ' elder " and "bishop" refer to the same identical office, but it shows that Peter counted himself as one among them ; and that not only by his precept but by his example he showed that in this office, although overseers they were not overrulers or lords. The true idea on this point has been clearly stated as follows : "It has been said that the pope, the bishops, the priests, and all those who people convents, form the spiritual or ecclesiastical estate ; and that princes, nobles, citizens, and peasants form the secular or lay estate. This is a specious tale But let no man be alarmed. All Chris- tians belong to the spiritual estate ; and the only difference between them is in the functions which they fulfill. We have all but one baptism, but one faith ; and these constitute the spiritual man. Unction, tonsure, ordination, consecration, given by the pope, or by a bishop, may make a hypocrite, but can never make a spiritual man. We are all consecrated priests by baptism, as St. Peter says: 'You are a royal priesthood;' although all do not actually perform the offices of kings and priests, because no one can assume what is common to all without the common consent. But if this consecration of God did not belong to us, the unction of the pope could not make a single priest. If ten brothers, the sons of one king, and possessing equal claims to his inheritance, should choose one of their number to administer for them, they would all be kings, and yet only one of them would be the administrator of their common power. So it is in the church. Were several pious lay- men banished to a desert, and were they, from not having among them a priest consecrated by a bishop, to agree in selecting one of their A CLERICAL ARISTOCRACY CREATED. 231 number, whether married or not, he would be as truly a priest as if all the bishops of the world had consecrated him." Luther. 1 Such is the order in the church of Christ, and as every Christian is God's freeman and Christ's servant, it follows as has been well stated, that " monarchy in spiritual things does not harmonize with the spirit of Christianity." Neander* Yet this order was not suffered long to remain. A distinc- tion 'was very soon asserted between the bishop and the elder, and the bishop assumed a precedence and an authority over the elder, who was now distinguished from the bishop by the title of "presbyter" only. This was easily and very naturally accomplished. For instance, a church would be established in a certain city. Soon perhaps another church or churches would be established in that same city, or near to it in the country. These other churches would look naturally to the original church as to a mother, and the elders of the original church would naturally have a care for the others as they arose. It was only proper to show Christian respect and deference to these ; but this respect and deference was soon demanded, and authority to require it was asserted by those who were bishops first. Again : as churches multiplied and with them also elders multiplied, it was necessary, in carrying forward the work of the gospel, for the officers of the church often to have meetings for consultation. On these occasions it was but natural and proper for the seniors to preside ; but instead of allowing this to remain still a matter of choice in the conducting of each successive meeting or assembly, it was claimed as a right that the one originally chosen should hold that position for life. 1 D'Aubigne's " History of the Reformation," book vi, chap, iii, par. 7. 8 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. i, Section Second, part i, div. i, A, par. 5. EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. Thus was that distinction established between the elders or presbyters, and the bishops. Those who usurped this per- manent authority and office took to themselves exclusively the title of "bishop," and all the others were still to retain the title of "presbyter." The presbyters in turn assumed over the deacons a supremacy and authority which did not belong to them, and all together bishops, presbyters, and deacons held themselves to be superior orders in the church over the general membership, and assumed to themselves the title of "clergy," while upon the general membership the term " laity" was conferred. In support of these three orders among the "clergy," it was claimed that they came in proper succession from the high-priests, the priests, and the Levites of the Levitical law. "Accordingly, the bishops considered themselves as invested with a rank and character similar to those of the high-priest among the Jews, while the presbyters represented the priests, and the deacons the Levites." JIbskeim. 3 These distinctions were established as early as the middle of the second century. This led to a further and most wicked invention. As they were now priests and Levites after the order of the priesthood of the former dispensation, it was necessary that they also should have a sacrifice to offer. Accordingly, the Lord's supper was turned into "the unbloody sacrifice." Thus arose that which is still in the Roman Catholic Church the daily "sacrifice" of the mass. "The comparison of the Christian oblations with the Jewish victims and sacrifices, produced many unnecessary rites, and by degrees corrupted the very doctrine of the holy supper, which was converted, sooner, in fact, than one would think, into a sacrifice." Mosheim* With this also came a splen- dor in dress, copied from that of the former real priesthood. The estimate in which the bishop was now held may be 8 " Ecclesiastical History," Century ii, part ii, chap, ii, par. 4, Maclaine's trans- lation. * Id., chap, iv, par. 4, Murdock's translation. BISHOPRIC! OF ROME ASSERTS PRE-EMINENCE. 233 gathered from the following words of a document of the second century: "It is manifest, therefore, that we should look upon the bishop even as we would upon the Lord himself." " It is well to reverence both God and the bishop. He who honors the bishop has been honored of God ; he who does anything without the knowledge of the bishop, does (in reality) serve the devil." Ignatius. 5 The next step was for certain bishops to assert authority over other bishops ; and the plea upon which this was claimed as a right, was that the bishops of those churches which had been established by the apostles were of right to be considered as superior to all others. Furthermore it was claimed that in those churches the true doctrine of Christ had been preserved in the greatest purity. As the bishops of those churches claimed to be the repositories of the true doctrine, whenever any question arose upon any matter of doctrine or interpretation of the scripture, appeal was made to the bishop of the nearest apostolic church. As Rome was the capital of the empire, and as the church there claimed direct descent not only from one but from two apostles, it soon came to pass that the church of Rome claimed to be the source of true doctrine, and the bishop of that church to be supreme over all other bishops. In the latter part of the second century, during the episco- pate of Elentherius, A. D. 176 to 192, the absolute authority of the church of Rome in matters of doctrine was plainly asserted in the following words : "It is incumbent to obey the presbyters who are in the church, those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the apostles ; those who, together with the succession of the episcopate, have received the certain gift of truth, according to the good pleasure of the father." "Since, however, it would be very tedious, in such a volume as this, to reckon up the successions of all the churches, we do put to confusion all those who, in whatever manner, whether by an evil self-pleasing, by vainglory, or by blindness and perverse opinion, assemble in unauthor- 5 " Epistle to the Ephesians," chap, vi, and " To the Smyrnaeans," chap. ix. 234 THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. ized meetings ; (we do this, I say) by indicating that tradition derived from the apostles, of the very great, the very ancient, and universally- known church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul ; as also (by pointing out) the faith preached to men, which comes down to our time by means of the succession of the bishops. For it is a matter of necessity that every church should agree with this church, on account of its pre-eminent authority. . . . Since, therefore, we have such proofs, it is not necessary to seek the truth among others which it is easy to obtain from the church ; since the apos- tles, like a rich man depositing his money in a bank, lodged in her hands most copiously all things pertaining to the truth : so that every man, whosoever will, can draw from her the water of life. For she is the entrance to life; all others are thieves and robbers." Irenaus. 6 When this authority and power was asserted during the bishopric of Eleutherius, it is not at all strange that his im- mediate successor, Victor, A. D. 192 to 202, should attempt to carry into practice the authority thus claimed for him. The occasion of it was the question of the celebration of what is now Easter, as already related in the preceding chapter. This action of Victor is pronounced by Bower "the first essay of papal usurpation." Thus early did Rome not only claim supremacy, but attempt to enforce her claim of suprem- acy, over all other churches. Such was the arrogance of the bishops of Rome at the beginning of the third century. The character of the bishopric in A. D. 250 is clearly seen in the quotation already given on page 131 of this book ; but for the convenience of the reader, we insert it again in this place : "Not a few bishops who ought to furnish both exhortation and example to others, despising their divine charge, became agents in secular business, forsook their throne, deserted their people, wandered about over foreign provinces, hunted the markets for gainful merchandise, while brethren were starving in the church. They sought to possess money in hoards, they seized estates by crafty deceits, they increased their gains by multiplying usuries." Cyprian. 1 6 "Against Heresies," book iv, chap, xxvi, par. 2 ; book iii, chap, iii, par. 2; and book iii, chap, iv, par. 1. 7 " On the Lapsed," chap. vi. CONTENTIONS IN ROME AND CARTHAGE. 235 As the bishopric became more exalted, and arrogated to itself more authority, the office became an object of un- worthy ambition and unholy aspiration. Arrogance charac- terized those who were in power, and envy those who were not. And whenever a vacancy occurred, unseemly and wholly unchristian strife arose among rival presbyters for the vacant seat. "The deacons, beholding the presbyters thus deserting their functions, boldly invaded their rights and privileges ; and the effects of a corrupt ambition were spread through every rank of the sacred order." Mosheim.* Cornelius became bishop of Rome, A. D. 251. A pres- byter of the same church aspired to the same office, and was supported by a considerable party in the church, and also by five other presbyters. He wrote letters to Cyprian, bishop of Carthage, charging Cornelius with heinous sins. Corne- lius also wrote about the same time to Cyprian, who thus learning of the division in the church of Rome, called to- gether in council the bishops of his province, and they sent two of their number with letters to Rome to inquire into the trouble. The church in Rome immediately sent letters in answer to the bishops in Africa, assuring them that Cornelius had been properly chosen, and was worthy of the situation. The two messengers returning, also confirmed the testimony of the letters by a report of their own investigations. Upon this the African bishops sent Cornelius a series of resolu- tions which they had adopted in the council lately held, with respect to those who denied the faith in the time of the persecution by Decius, to the effect that all such should not be excluded forever from the church, but should be admitted after doing sufficient penance those who had bought exemption in the time of persecution being obliged to do longer penance than others ; and if while doing penance they should come suddenly to the point of death, they should be received into the church at once. Upon receiving the resolutions, Cornelius called a council 8 "Ecclesiastical History," Century iii, part ii, chap, ii, par. 4. 236 THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. of sixty bishops, and a large number from the other orders of the clergy. Among them was Novatian, who had been opposed to Cornelius for the office of bishop. In the council he likewise opposed the resolution sent up from Africa. He maintained that all who had yielded in the time of persecu- tion ought never again to be admitted to the church upon any terms whatever. The majority, however, was against him, and he himself was turned out of the church. Upon this he joined with a presbyter by the name of Novatus, who had been turned out of the church at Carthage, and the followers of the two together agreed to ordain Novatian a bishop in Rome. Novatian immediately set himself in opposition to Cornelius. This party then sent letters to the other churches round about, informing them of the ordination of Novatian, and exhorting them not to communicate with any who had in any way denied the faith under persecution. Cornelius also at the same time wrote to other bishops informing them that the ordination of Novatian was irregular. Thus the division and the controversy spread farther and farther. While this was going on in Rome, there was also a division in the church of Carthage, where a certain Felicissi- mus had been excommunicated, whose party also had elected a bishop of their own, by the name of Fortunatus. Felicissi- mus went to Rome, hoping to win Cornelius to his side, and the messengers of Novatian went to Carthage to gain the favor of Cyprian and the bishops of Africa to their side. But Cyprian stood by the bishop of Rome, and carried with him the bishops of Africa. Novatian sent yet other mes- sengers into Africa, who diligently worked" up partisans there, and it was not long before they secured the ordination of some of their party as bishops. These newly ordained bishops asserted their right to exercise the office of bishop over churches connected with the church of Rome, instead of the regular bishops of those churches. This increased the confusion, which spread finally throughout the provinces of Africa. This became a matter of great perplexity to THE BISHOPS USURP THE PLACE OF CHRIST. 23Y Cornelius. As both parties were continually sending their letters, and messengers, and embassies, to him, and as both made the same claims, it was very difficult for him to decide who were the regular Catholic bishops. But Cyprian, to relieve this perplexity, drew up a list of all the Catholic bishops in the African provinces, and sent it to Cornelius at Rome. These discussions gave an opportunity for the further assertion of the dignity and authority of the bishopric. Cyprian, "the representative of the episcopal system" (JVeander 9 ), declared that ''The church is founded upon the bishops, and every act of the church is controlled by these same rulers." "Whence you ought to know that the bishop is in the church, and the church in the bishop ; and if any one be not with the bishop, that he is not in the church." 10 He insisted that God made the bishops and the bishops made the deacons, and argued thus : " But if we [bishops] may dare anything against God who makes bishops, deacons may also dare against us by whom they are made." 11 ' ' The epistle of Cyprian to Cornelius, bishop of Rome, shows the height to which the episcopal power had aspired before the religion of Christ had become that of the Roman empire. The passages of the Old Testament, and even of the New, in which honor or deference is paid to the Hebrew pontificate, are recited in profuse detail ; implicit obedience is demanded for the priest of God, who is the sole infallible judge or delegate of Christ." Jfilman. Cornelius was succeeded in the bishopric of Rome by Lucius, who was put to death in less than six months, and was succeeded by Stephen, A. D. 253 to 258. Soon after 9 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. i, Section Second, part 1, div. i, B, par. 5. 10 Epistle xxvi, chap, i, and epistle Ixviii, chap. viii. u Epistle Ixiv, chap. 111. 12 " History of Christianity, " book iv, chap, i, par. 22. 238 THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. Stephen's election, the bishop of Lyons in Gaul wrote to inform him that the bishop of Aries had adopted the views and discipline of Novatian. He also wrote to Cyprian to the same effect. About the same time a question involving much the same point was causing a difficulty in Spain. There two bishops, Basilides and Martial, had been deposed by a council of bishops, and two others were appointed in their places. They were both charged with surrendering the Scriptures in the time of persecution. Basilides went to Rome to secure the support of the bishop of Rome in his desire to be re-instated. In this he succeeded, and returned to Spain, and there exercised his office as bishop as he had formerly done, and Martial followed his example. Then the bishops of Spain sent letters and deputies to Carthage, asking the advice and help of the African bishops ; and the deputies whom they sent were the two bishops whom they had put in the place of Basilides and Martial. A council of twenty- eight bishops was held in Carthage, presided over by Cyprian. Having only a one-sided view of the case, as the bishop of Rome had had on the other side, they indorsed the action of the church of Spain, and decided that Basilides and Martial ought not to be acknowledged as bishops ; that it was not lawful to commune with them ; and that whosoever should do so ought to be excommunicated. Not long afterward, there arose another subject of con- troversy, which caused much contention with far-reaching consequences. As the bishops arrogated to themselves more and more authority, both in discipline and doctrine, "her- etics " increased. Whosoever might disagree with the bishop, was at once branded as a heretic, and was cut off from his communion, as Diotrephes had counted as a heretic even the apostle John. Upon this point the representative of the episcopal system further declared : "Neither have heresies arisen, nor have schisms originated, from any other source than from this, that God's priest is not obeyed ; nor do they ponsider that there is one person for the time priest in the church, and AN EPISCOPAL PUNIC WAR. 239 for the time judge in the stead of Christ ; whom, if according to divine teaching, the whole fraternity should obey, no one would stir up any- thing against the college of priests ; no one, after the divine judgment, after the suffrage of the people, after the consent of the co-bishops, would make himself a judge, not now of the bishop, but of God. No one would rend the church by a division of the unity of Christ." Cyprian. He therefore argued that if any person was outside of this system of episcopal unity, and was not obedient to the bishop, this was all the evidence necessary to demonstrate that he was a heretic. Consequently he declared that no one ought " even to be inquisitive as to what" any one "teaches, so long as he teaches out of the pale of unity." u In this way the truth itself could easily be made heresy. By this system, " heretics " soon became numerous, and, as many persons were changing their residence from place to place, a question was raised whether baptism by heretics was valid. Some bishops of important churches held that it was, others held that it was not. Yet up to this time all bishops and churches were allowed to decide this for themselves. A council of bishops in Africa and JNumidia, about the begin- ning of the third century, had established in those provinces the discipline that all heretics must be re-baptized when ap- plying for admission to any of those churches. This practice was also adopted in Cappadocia, Galatia, Phrygia, Cilicia, and neighboring provinces, by a council held at Iconium in Phrygia, A. D. 230. Pontus and Egypt followed the same course, but Italy, Gaul, and Spain held, on the contrary, that baptism by heretics was valid, it mattered not what the heresy might be. Thus stood the question when Stephen became bishop of Rome. Soon after the difficulty with the Spanish bishops, some bishops of Numidia and Mauritania sent in- quiries to Cyprian, raising anew the question of baptism by heretics. A council of seventy-one bishops was held at Carthage, which declared that the practice of re-baptizing should be invariably followed. The council sent a letter to 13 Epistle liv, chap. v. u /d., li, chap. xiiv. 21 2 -tO THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. Stephen of Home, reporting their decision, and asking him to agree with it. Stephen answered the council by letter in which he first called particular attention to the great dignity of the bishopric of Rome, and the honor which it derived from its succession to the apostle Peter. Next he informed them that he absolutely rejected and condemned their decrees. He then threatened to cut off from his communion all who should presume to disobey by re-baptizing any heretics, and finally not only ordered Cyprian to change his opinion on the subject, and practice accordingly, but declared him to be "a false Christ," a "false apostle," and a "deceitful workman." On receipt of Stephen's letter, Cyprian called another council of eighty -five bishops, which met September 1, A. D. 256. The council canvassed the whole subject anew, came to their original conclusion, and again sent word by messengers to Stephen, who not only refused to receive them at all, but forbade all the church of Rome either to receive or entertain them in any manner. He then proceeded to execute his threat, and excommunicated the whole council, and w T hoever held the same opinion as the council. This excluded from his communion the bishops of Africa, Numidia, Mauritania, Egypt, Cilicia, Galatia, and Cappadocia. He endeavored by a letter, however, to win the bishop of Alex- andria to his view, but failed. Cyprian wrote to Firmilian, bishop of Caesarea in Cappa- docia, telling him of Stephen's conduct. In reply Firmilian wrote to Cyprian a letter in which he compared Stephen to Judas Iscariot, and branded him as "inhuman," "auda- cious," "insolent," "wicked," "impious," "schismatic," "a defamer of Peter and Paul," and "worse than all heretics." This Firmilian is pronounced "one of the most eminent prelates at that time in the church, both for piety and learning ; " but Cyprian was not far behind him and Stephen in eminence for this kind of piety. For he wrote to the bishop of Sobrata a letter in which he charged Stephen THE BISIIOPRIC OF ANTIOGH. 241 with " pride and impertinence, self-contradiction and igno- rance, with indifference, obstinacy, and childishness," and called him "a favorer and abettor of heretics against the church of God.'" -Bower. Stephen died August 2, A. D. 257, and thus was stopped the generous flow of pious phrases. Stephen was succeeded by Sixtus II, who held the office about a year, and was put to death in the persecu- tion under Valerian. He was succeeded July 22, A. D. 259, by JDionysius. At this time there was another Dionysius, who was bishop of Alexandria, and who had entered into a cer- tain controversy with Sabellius upon the subject of the trinity. In the arguments which he published, some per- sons thought they discovered heresy, and reported it to the bishop of Rome, who called a council of the bishops of Italy, and requested Dionysius to answer the accusation and-give an explanation of his faith. Dionysius addressed to the bishop of Rome a "confutation and apology," ex- plaining the expressions in his former writings, which it was charged contained heresy. During the bishopric of Dionysius, there occurred the case of Paul of Samosata, who at that time was bishop of Antioch, an account of which will illustrate the condition of the bishoprics of the principal cities of the empire at this time. The bishops of the East said of Paul that before his connection with the church he was poor almost to beggary, and that he had received neither wealth from his father nor obtained possessions by any art or trade or business, yet hud now acquired excessive wealth by his iniquities and sacrileges ; that by various means which he employed, he had exacted and extorted from the brethren, promising to aid them for a reward ; that he took advantage of those who were in difficulty, to compel them to give him money to be free from their oppressors ; that he made merchan- dise of piety ; that he affected lofty things, and assumed too great things, attaining worldly dignity, wishing rather to be 15 " Lives of the Popes," Stephen, par. 8. THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. called a magistrate than a bishop ; that he went strutting through the forum reading letters and repeating them aloud as he walked ; that in public he was escorted by multitudes going before and following after him ; that he brought reproach upon the faith by his pomp and haughtiness ; that out of vanity and proud pretensions he contrived in ecclesiastical assemblies to catch at glory and empty shad- ows, and to confound the minds of the more simple ; that he had prepared himself a tribunal and a high throne sep- arated from the people like a ruler of this world, rather than a disciple of Christ ; that he was in the habit of slapping his hand upon his thigh and stamping upon the tribunal with his foot, reproving and insulting those who would not ap- plaud his sermons ; that he magnified himself not as a bishop but as a sophist and juggler ; that he stopped the singing of psalms in honor of Christ, and had prepared choirs of women to sing other compositions at the great fes- tivals ; that he hired deacons and presbyters of neighbor- ing districts to preach his views of the trinity ; that he had with him certain women whom the people of Antioch called "adopted sisters;" that he allowed his presbyters and deacons also to follow the same practice ; that he had made his presbyters and deacons rich by indulging their covetous dispositions, and had thus bought their favor, so that none of them would accuse him of the evil doing ; that many bishops beside Paul had indulged themselves in the same things, or had incurred suspicion of it, especially in the matter of the adopted sisters ; that although Paul had dis- missed one of these, he retained two others with him, bloom- ing in age and eminent in beauty, taking them with him wherever he went, indulging in luxury and surfeiting ; that although men around him were groaning and lamenting be- cause of these things, they were so much afraid of his tyranny and power that they did not venture to accuse him ; and finally, that all these things might be borne with in the hope of correcting the evil, were it not that he had trifled DISGRACEFUL CHARACTER OF THE BISHOPRIC. 243 away the sacred mystery, and paraded his execrable heresy. 18 On account of Paul's heresy, a council of eighty bishops was assembled at Antioch. Paul was excommunicated, pro- nounced deposed from the bishopric, and the council on their own authority appointed a successor. Their assumed authority to appoint a successor without consulting the membership of the church of Antioch, caused yet a larger number to take sides with Paul, because such proceeding was decidedly irregular. At this time Zenobia was queen of the East, and with her Paul was rather a favorite. Under her protection and upon the irregularity of the proceedings of the council, he openly for four years defied the decrees of the council, and held his place as bishop of Antioch. When Aurelian, in A. D. 2YO, went to the East to dethrone Zenobia, the bishops appealed to him to enforce their decrees and remove Paul. Aurelian referred the case for decision to the bishops of Rome and Italy. Before this controversy was ended, Dionysius died, and his successor, Felix, decided against Paul. Then according to the decree that Aurelian had al- ready pronounced, Paul was removed from the office and emoluments of the bishopric of Antioch. We do not know whether the charges brought against Paul were all true or not, as those who made the charges were all his enemies. But whether they were true or not, is not particularly important ; because if they were true, it is not to the credit of the bishopric of that time, for they clearly in- volve other bishops in the most serious moral delinquencies of Paul. On the other hand if the charges were not true, then that a company of eighty bishops should falsely make such charges, is scarcely less to the credit of the bishopric of the time, than the other would be if it were true. In either case, therefore, it is certain that the statement of Eusebius of the condition of the bishopric in 302, when the Diocletian persecution began, is strictly true. ' ' They were sunk in negligence and sloth, one envying and reviling an- 16 "Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History," book vii, chap. xxx. 244 THE EXALTATION OF THE BISHOPRIC. other in different ways, and were almost on the point of tak- ing up arms against each other, and were assailing each other with words as with darts and spears, prelates inveighing against prelates, and people rising up against people, and hypocrisy and dissimulation had arisen to the greatest height of malignity." Also some who appeared to be pastors were inflamed against each other with mutual strifes, only accumu- lating quarrels and threats, rivalship, hostility, and hatred to each other, only anxious to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for themselves. The Scripture was fulfilled. There had come a falling away ; there was a self-exaltation of the bishopric ; and THE TIME WAS COME WHEN THE MAN OF SIN SHOULD BE REVEALED. COXSTANTIXE. CHAPTER X. THE RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE. MUCH research and great effort have been made to discover the time of Constantino's conversion to Christianity. One writer dates it at his accession in 306, another in 312, another in 321, yet another not till 323, and still another about 327. Others put it at his death-bed baptism, while still others insist that he never was a Christian. When he became a Christian, or whether he ever did, is an interesting question even at this time, and we propose to set forth as fully as in our power lies, facts by which any person can decide this question. We have already given the history of Constantino's accession and onward to the defeat of Maxentius. We have also shown that at the time of his accession to the throne he was a devout worshiper of the sun. We have related how an incursion of the Franks into Gaul drew him from Aries to the Rhine, and gave Maximian an opportunity to usurp the imperial authority in his absence ; and how he was called by this usurpation from his war with the Franks to save his own imperial authority. As he was about to return to the Rhine to enter again upon the war with the Franks, he received the intelligence that they had retired from Gaul to their own country ; and to express his gratitude A. D. 308 "he gave public thanks in a celebrated temple of Apollo, probably at Autun (Augustodunum), and presented a magnificent offering to the god." JVeander. 1 '"History of the Christian "Religion," Vol. ii, Section First, part i, A, par. 11. [245] 246 THE RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE. We have also shown how events rapidly culminated in the war between him and Maxentius, and of his attitude toward Christians, as expressed in the Edict of Milan. "Up to this period, all that we know of Constantine's religion would imply that he was outwardly, and even zealously, pagan. In a public oration, his panegyrist extols the magnifi- cence of his offerings to the gods. His victorious presence was not merely expected to restore more than their former splendor to the Gaulish cities ruined by barbaric incursions, but sumptuous temples were to arise at his bidding, to pro- pitiate the deities, particularly Apollo, his tutelary god. The medals struck for these victories are covered with the symbols of paganism." Milman* But about the latter part of the year 311 or early in 312, there certainly came such a change in his mind as to lead him to favor Christianity. The influences that caused this change will be more fully set forth hereafter. In this place it is necessary merely to say that there was enmity between him and Galerius, which of itself naturally threw Constantine into opposition to the plans and ambitions of that emperor. Galerius had done all that he could to keep Constantine from escaping from the dominions of Diocletian to those of Con- stantius. Constantine knew that the purpose of Galerius in this was nothing but evil, if not death, to him. By extra- ordinary speed he defeated the scheme of Galerius in this, and when he was made emperor in Britain, as we have seen, the purposes of Galerius were almost wholly disconcerted. This, we repeat, naturally made Constantine an opponent of the plans of Galerius. Therefore when Galerius spent his strongest efforts in behalf of the pagan party in the State, Constantine naturally leaned toward the other. In this also he had the example of his humane father, who, although not able to defeat wholly the edicts of persecution, greatly modified their effects. Another thing that influenced him in this direction was because, as he himself said, 2 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 33. HIS LOW UTILITARIANISM. 247 "My father revered the Christian God, arid uniformly prospered, while the emperors who worshiped the heathen gods, died a miserable death ; therefore, that I may enjoy a happy life and reign, I will imitate the example of my father, and join myself to the cause of the Christians, who are growing daily, while the heathen are diminishing." 3 And "this low utilitarian consideration weighed heavily in the mind of an ambitious captain, who looked forward to the highest seat of power within the gift of his age." SchajfS It is manifest that the only consideration that operated upon his mind at this time was this utilitarian one, and that whatever favor he felt toward Christians so far was merely as a matter of policy, with the hope that by this he might be aided in his aspirations to the sole rulership of the empire. This is confirmed by another in these words : "But to Constantine himself, if at this time Christianity had obtained any hold upon his mind, it was now the Christianity of the warrior, as subsequently it was that of the statesman. It was the military com- mander who availed himself of the assistance of any tutelar divinity who might insure success to his daring enterprise." Milman. 5 Such was his attitude toward Christianity before the defeat of Maxentius. Nor was there afterward any material change, either in his profession or his character. In the same manner as the cruel emperors before him, at the defeat of Maxentius, not content with the death of that emperor himself and a large number of his adherents, he executed vengeance also on his infant son. "Utterly devoid of faith in anything else except himself and his own destiny, unyield- ing in that ambition to exercise dominion, which nerved him for the doubtful war against Maxentius, he regarded both mankind and religion with pity and contempt, and sought to rule men for their good and his own glory, by means of any faith which they might prefer ; and hence, as Christianity became more known and popular, he identified himself with it more and more, only in order to foster any agency which 3 Schaff, " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 2, par. 15. * Id. 6 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 41. 248 THE RELIGION OF CON8TANTINE. seemed to be available in the work of consolidating the war- ring factions of the empire, and securing the permanency of his throne." - The Author of " Arius the Libyan." At what time he made the labarum is not certainly known ; but whenever it was, it was simply another instance of his policy in pretending to favor the church party while still re- taining his paganism. For when he constructed the labarum, he simply " changed the heathen labarum into a standard of the Christian cross with the Greek monogram of Christ, which he had also put upon the shields of his soldiers." " On the top of the shaft was a crown composed of gold and precious stones, and containing the monogram of Christ ; and just under this crown was a likeness of the emperor and his sons in gold. " Schaff. That by this emblem Constantine intended to profess to the church party his alliance with them, is evident, yet he did not propose to forsake his paganism ; for the object in placing there the likenesses of himself and his sons was that they might be worshiped by the pagan part of his army. This is confirmed in the following words : "Even in the labarum, if the initiated eyes of the Christian soldiery could discern the sacred symbol of Christ indistinctly glittering above the cross, there appeared, either embossed on the beam below or embroidered on the square purple banner which depended from it, the bust of the em- peror and those of his family, to whom the heathen part of his army might pay their homage of veneration." "And so, for the first time, the meek and peaceful Jesus became the God of battle ; and the cross, the holy sign of Christian redemption, a banner of bloody strife." Mil-man. 1 In honor of his triumph over Maxentius, a statue of him- self was erected in the Roman forum A. D. 316. In his right hand was the labarum with the inscription, "By virtue of this salutary sign, which is the true symbol of valor, I have preserved and liberated your city from the yoke of tyranny." Eusebius. 8 6 " History of the Christian Church," Vol iii, \ 2, par. 24, and note 2. 7 " History of Christianity," book iii. chap. I, par. 42, 39. 8 " Life of Constautine," book i, chap. xl. PAGAN AND APOSTATE CHRISTIAN. 249 Afterward a triumphal arch was also built in Rome to commemorate the victory at the Milvian bridge, in which his ambiguous relationship between the two religions is again displayed : 'The inscription on this arch of Constantino ascribes his victory over the hated tyrant, not only to his master mind, but indefinitely also to the impulse of Deity, by which a Christian would naturally under- stand the true God, while a heathen, like the orator Nazarius, in his eulogy on Coustantine, might take it for the celestial guardian power of the ' urbs (cterna' [the eternal city]." Again : after the defeat of Maxentius and his triumphal entry into the city of Rome, though he declined to celebrate the pagan rite of going to the Capitol to offer sacrifice to Jupiter and the gods, he restored the pagan temples, and assumed the title of Pontifex Maximum. And when some pagans of Africa brought to him the head of Maxentius, he granted as a reward that the province of Africa should be permitted to establish a priesthood and a worship in honor of the family of Constantine. We have before related that in 313 jointly with Licinius he issued the Edict of Milan, which "confirmed to each individual of the Roman world the privilege of choosing and professing his own religion." Shortly after this he openly patronized the Catholic Church, and then the Edict of Milan was reversed in his part of the dominion, "and the sects who dissented from the Catholic Church were afflicted and oppressed." Soon afterward he exempted the Catholic- clergy from all public offices and obligations ; yet in A. D. 317, his coins still bore the pagan symbols. In A. D. 321, to please the bishops of the Catholic Church he issued an edict commanding judges, townspeople, and mechanics to rest on Sunday. Yet in this also his paganism was still manifest, as the edict required rest on "the venerable day of the sun," and "enjoined the observance, or rather forbade the public desecration, of Sunday, not under the name of Sabbat'int, or Dies Domini, but under its old astrological and heathen title, 9 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 2, par. 25. 250 THE RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE. Dies Solis, familiar to all his subjects, so that the law was as applicable to the worshipers of Hercules, Apollo, and Mithras, as to the Christians." Schaff. 10 Another considerable authority confirms this fact in the following statement : "To fully understand the provisions of this legislation, the peculiar position of Constantine must be taken into consideration. He was not himself free from all remains of heathen superstition. It seems certain that before his conversion he had been particularly devoted to the wor- ship of Apollo, the sun-god. . . . The problem before him was to legislate for the new faith in such a manner as not to seem entirely inconsistent with his old practices, and not to come in conflict with the prejudices of his pagan subjects. These facts serve to explain the peculiarities of this decree. He names the holy day, not the Lord's day, but the ' day of the sun,' the heathen designation, and thus at once seems to identify it with his former Apollo-worship." Rev. Oeo. Elliott. 11 Another excellent authority remarks upon this as fol- lows : - "It is the day of the sun, which is to be observed by the general veneration. The courts were to be closed, and the noise and tumult of public business and legal litigation were no longer to violate the repose of the sacred day. But the believer in tJie new paganism, of which the solar worship was the characteristic, might acquiesce without scruple in the sanctity of the first day of the week." Milman. 12 And yet another adds the following pointed testimony : "The same tenacious adherence to the ancient god of light has left its trace, even to our own time, on one of the most sacred and universal of Christian institutions. The retention of the old pagan name of 'Dies Solis,' or ' Sunday,' for the weekly Christian festival, is, in great meas- ure, owing to the union of pagan and Christian sentiment with which the first day of the week was recommended by Constantine to his subjects, pagan and Christian alike, as the ' venerable day of the sun.' ... It was his mode of harmonizing the discordant religions of the empire under one common institution." Stanley. 10 Id., \ 75, par. 5. "Fletcher (five hundred dollar) Prize Essay, "Abiding Sabbath," p. 229. Copyrighted and published by American Tract Society, 1884. 12 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 44. 13 " History of the Eastern Church," Lecture vi, par. 15. HIS PERJURY AND CRUELTY. 251 The next day after issuing this Sunday law, that is, March 8, A. D. 321, he published another edict, in which he "ex- pressly ordains, that whenever lightning should strike the im- perial palace or any other public building, the haruspices, according to ancient usage, should be consulted as to what it might signify, and a careful report of the answer should be drawn up for his use. " And by yet another " law of the same year, he declares also the employment of heathen magic, for good ends, as for the prevention or healing of diseases, for the protection of harvests, for the prevention of rain and of hail, to be permitted, and in such expressions, too, as certainly betray a faith in the efficacy of these pretended supernatural means, unless the whole is to be ascribed simply to the legal forms of paganism." Neander. u Meanwhile Constantine had been drawing closer to the bishops, and bestowing favors on the Catholic Church, the full account of which will be given in the following chapters. By this time, therefore, he could afford to hold the profession of the two religions upon an equal balance. Accordingly, now " his coins bore on the one side the letters of the name of Christ ; on the other the figure of the sun- god, and the inscription, 'Sol invictus^ (the unconquerable sun), as if he could not bear to relinquish the patronage of the bright luminary which represented to him, as to Augustus and to Julian, his own guardian Deity." Stanley. In A. D. 315 there had been war between Constantine and Licinius. After two battles, a peace was concluded which continued till 323, when, "without any previous injury," but out of sheer ambition and " a love of power that would brook no rival," and " at the expense of truth and humanity," Constantine entered again upon a war with Licinius. On July 3 was fought the battle of Hadrianople, in which Licinius was defeated with a loss of thirty-four thousand men. u " History of the Christian Religion," Vol. ii, Section First, part i, A, par. 33. 15 "History of the Eastern Church," 7d., par. 14. 22 252 THE RELIGION OF CON8TANTINE. He retreated to Byzantium, where Constantine beseiged him. When Constantine was about to take the city, Licinius deserted it and passed over to Asia. Constantine followed, and another battle was fought at Chrysopolis, where Licinius was again defeated with so great a loss of men that he was compelled to sue for peace. His wife Constantia, the sister of Constantine, interceded with her brother in favor of her husband, and obtained from him a solemn promise, con- firmed by an oath, that if Licinius would resign all claims to the office of emperor, he should be allowed to pass the rest of his life in peace and as became his station. Thes- salonica was appointed as the place of his dwelling, or as it proved, his imprisonment ; and it was not long before he was put to death, A. D. 324, in violation of the solemn oath of Constantine. The fact that Licinius was past seventy years of age at the time, lent to the transaction, in addition to its character of deliberate perjury, the element of positive cruelty. The next year, A. D. 325, Constantine convened at Nice the first general council of the Catholic Church, presided over its deliberations, and enforced its decrees. As he entered to take his seat as president of the council, he is thus described : " There was a brightness in his look and a mingled expression of fierceness and gentleness in his lion-like eye, which well became one who, as Augustus before him, had fancied, and perhaps still fancied, himself to be the favorite of the sun-god Apollo." Stanley. 16 By this time he had progressed so- far in his profession of the Catholic religion that he counted himself a bishop, or rather, a bishop of bishops, though he had never yet been received even into the order of Catechumens, much less had he been initiated into full membership in the church. The following year A. D. 326 Constantine went to Rome to celebrate in that city the twentieth year of his accession to the office of emperor, and while there, in the 16 /d., Lecture iv, par. 4. MANY TIMES A MURDERER. 253 month of April, and wholly in jealous tyranny, he had his son Crispus murdered. Crispus was his eldest son, who had assisted in his wars, especially with Licinius, and had proved himself an able commander. He commanded the fleet at the siege of Byzantium, and after the battle the .names of Constantine and Crispus were united in the joyful acclama- tions of their Eastern subjects. This excited the jealousy of Constantine, who soon began to slight Crispus, and bestow imperial favors upon his younger son, Constantius, who was but a mere boy. Constantine pretended that Crispus had entered into a conspiracy against him, and October 21, 325, he issued an edict restoring the order of delators, after the manner of Tiberius and Domitian. "By all the allure- ments of honors and rewards, he invites informers of every degree to accuse without exception his magistrates or minis- ters, his friends or his most intimate favorites, protesting, with a solemn asseveration, that he himself will listen to the charge." - Gibbon. 11 The informers were not long in finding accusations against Crispus and a large number of his friends, and "in the midst of the festival, the unfortunate Crispus was apprehended by order of the emperor, who laid aside the tenderness of a father, without assuming the equity of a judge. . . . He was sent under a strong guard to Pola, in Istria, where, soon afterwards, he was put to death, either by the hand of the executioner, or by the more gentle opera- tion of poison. The Caesar Licinius, a youth of amiable manners, was involved in the ruin of Crispus : and the stern jealousy of Constantine was unmoved by the prayers and tears of his favorite sister, pleading for the life of a son, whose rank was his only crime, and whose loss she did not long survive." Gibbon. 1 * Nor were these the only ones involved in the execution. "The sword of justice or of cruelty, once let loose, raged against those who were suspected as partisans of the danger- 17 "Decline and Fall," chap, xviii, par. 6. I8 2d., par. 7. 254 THE RELIGION OF CON8TANTINE. ous Crispus, or as implicated in the wide-spread conspiracy, till the bold satire of an eminent officer of state did not scru- ple, in some lines privately circulated, to compare the splen- did but bloody times with those of Nero." Jfilman. 19 Nor yet did he stop here. "This was only the first act of the domestic tragedy : the death of the emperor's wife Fausta, the partner of twenty years of wedlock, the mother of his three surviving sons, increased the general horror. She was suffocated in a bath which had been heated to an insupportable degree of temperature." " The tragedy which took place in the family of Constantine betrayed to the sur- prised and anxious world that, if his outward demeanor showed respect or veneration for Christianity, its milder doctrines had made little impression on the unsoftened pagan- ism of his heart." Milman. Shortly after this, Constantine's mother went to Jerusalem on a pilgrimage to recover the holy places, and to build churches upon them. She carried a letter from Constan- tine to Macarius, bishop of Jerusalem, in which he stated that it was always his "first and only object to excite all minds to the observation of the holy law with alacrity and diligence proportioned to the brightness of the manifestation which is thrown by new miracles upon the truth of the faith, day by day : " and that it was his " most intense desire to erect beautiful edifices " upon that spot which had been con- secrated ' ' by the sufferings of our Lord, who thus brought faith to light." 21 Helena was said to be about eighty years old at this time, and the tale was invented, and one hundred years later be- came a matter of history, that she discovered the tomb in which the Saviour had been buried ; that in it were found all three of the crosses that were used on the day of the cruci- fixion, the nails that were used in the crucifixion of the 19 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, ii, par. 12. 20 Id., par. 13, 10. 21 Theodoret's "Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap, xvii. H B o B P ffi THE TRUE CROSS AND CONSTANTINE. 355 Saviour, and the tablet which Pilate had caused to be put upon the cross of the Saviour. But nobody could tell which was the true cross. Yet says the fable : "From this trouble she was shortly relieved by Macarius, bishop of Jerusalem, whose faith solved the doubt, for he sought a sign from God and obtained it. The sign was this : A certain woman of the neighbor- hood, who had been long afflicted with disease, was now just at the point of death. The bishop therefore ordered that each of the crosses should be applied to the dying woman, believing that she would be healed upon being touched by the precious cross. Nor was he disappointed in his ex- pectation : for the two crosses having been applied which were not the Lord's, the woman still continued in a dying state ; but when the third, which was the true cross, touched her, she was immediately healed, and recovered her former strength. In this manner then was the genuine cross discovered. The emperor's mother erected over the place of the sepulcher a magnificent church, and named it New Jerusalem, having built it opposite to that old and deserted city. There she left a portion of the cross, inclosed in a silver case, as a memorial to those who might wish to see it. The other part she sent to the emperor, who, being per- suaded that the city would be perfectly secure where that relic should be preserved, privately inclosed it in his own statue, which stands on a large column of porphyry in the forum called Constantine's at Constantinople. / have written this from report indeed ; but almost all the inhabitants of Constantinople affirm that it is true. Moreover, Constantino caused the nails with which Christ's hands were fastened to the cross (for his mother having found these also in the sepulcher had sent them) to be converted into bridle bits and a helmet, which he used in his military expeditions." Socrates. 22 From this it would seem that by this time he would be ready to stand by the profession of Christianity alone, but such was not the case ; for in A. D. 328, when he traced the limits and laid the foundation of his projected new city of Constantinople, he held the same ambiguous course as form- erly, and accordingly ' ' issued an imperial edict announcing to the world that Constantino by the command of God had founded the eternal city." "But however the Deity might have intimated his injunctions to commence the work, or whatever the nature of the invisible guide which, as he de- 22 " Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap. xvii. 256 THE RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE. clared, thus directed his steps, this vague appeal to the Deity would impress with the same respect all his subjects, and by its impartial ambiguity offend none. In earlier times the pagans would have bowed down in homage before this manifestation of the nameless tutelar deity of the new city ; at the present period, they had become familiarized, as it were, with the concentration of Olympus into one Supreme Being. The Christians would, of course, assert the exclusive right of the one true God to this appellation, and attribute to his inspiration and guidance every important act of the Christian emperor." Milman. Yet a little later his actions seemed to indicate that he had reverted to paganism alone ; for when in A. D. 330 the act- ual work of building the city was inaugurated, the "ancient ritual of Roman paganism contained a solemn ceremony, which dedicated a new city to the protection of the Deity " (Milman zi ) : and Sopater, a Neoplatonic heathen, "assisted with his heathen ceremonies at the consecration." /Stanley. 25 However, in building the city he fully acquitted him- self in the estimation of both pagans and Catholics. For while he erected magnificent edifices for the Catholic Church, he also set up the images of the pagan deities "in all the public places of Constantinople. If the inhabitants were not encouraged, at least they were not forbidden, to pay divine honors to the immortal sculptures of Phidias and Praxiteles, which were brought from all quarters to adorn the squares and baths of Byzantium. The whole Roman world contributed to the splendor of Constantinople. The tutelar deities of all the cities of Greece (their influence, of course, much enfeebled by their removal from their local sanctuaries) were assembled, the Minerva of Lyndus, the Cybele of Mount Dindymus (which was said to have been placed there by the Argonauts), the muses of Helicon, the 23 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, iii, par. 5. 2 */d, par. 4. 25 "History of the Eastern Church," Lecture vi, par. 42. IS THIS PAGANISM OR CHRISTIANITY f 257 Amphitrite of Khodes, the Pan consecrated by united Greece after the defeat of the Persians, the Delphic Tripod. The Dioscuri [Castor and Pollux] overlooked the Hippodrome." Milman. 26 When in 334 the city was finished, and he would cele- brate its completion, "the ceremonial of the dedication was attended by still more dubious circumstances. After a most splendid exhibition of chariot games in the Hippodrome, 1 the emperor moved in a magnificent car through the most public part of the city, encircled by all his guards in the attire of a religious ceremonial, and bearing torches in their hands. The emperor himself held a golden statue of the Fortune of the city in his hands. An imperial edict enacted the annual celebration of this rite. On the birthday of the city, the gilded statue of himself, thus bearing the same golden image of Fortune, was annually to be led through the Hippodrome to the foot of the imperial throne, and to receive the ado- ration of the reigning emperor." MUmcm. Yet it seems as though he considered this not enough. When he had besieged Licinius at this place, he had pitched his tent on a certain hill. In the building of the city he chose that spot for the principal forum at one end of which was a statue of Cybele, and at the other the goddess of Fortune, the patroness of the new city. In the center of the forum he planted a column, the pedestal of which was of white marble twenty feet high. Upon this were set, one upon another, ten pieces of "porphyry, each of which meas- ured about ten feet in height and about thirty-three in cir- cumference," making the pillar in all about one hundred and twenty feet in height. On the top of this pillar, Constantine placed a colossaj bronze statue of Apollo, with the figure of his own head upon it, and round about the crown like the rays of the sun were the nails of "the true cross," which his mother had sent to him from Jerusalem. The full account 26 " History of Christianity," par. 6. 27 Id., par. 7. 258 THE RELIGION OF CONSTANTINO. of this is well given by another, and is of sufficient impor- tance in this connection to be quoted in full : " The lingering attachment of Constantino to the favorite supersti- tion of his earlier days may be traced on still better authority. The Grecian worship of Apollo had been exalted into the oriental veneration of the sun, as the visible representative of the Deity ; and of all the statues that were introduced from different quarters, none were received with greater honor than those of Apollo. In one part of the city stood the Pythian, in another the Sminthian deity. The Delphic Tripod, which, according to Zosimus, contained an image of the god, stood upon the column of three twisted serpents, supposed to represent the mystic Python. But on a still loftier, the famous pillar of porphyry, stood an image in which, if we are to credit modern authority (and the more modern our authority, the less likely is it to have invented so singular a statement), Constantino dared to mingle together the attributes of the sun, of Christ, and of himself. According to one tradition, this pillar was based, as it were, on another superstition. The venerable Palladium itself, surreptitiously conveyed from Rome, was buried beneath it, and thus transferred the eternal destiny of the old to the new capital. The pillar, formed of marble and of porphyry, rose to the height of a hundred and twenty feet. The colossal image on the top was that of Apollo, either from Phrygia or from Athens. But the head of Constantino had been substituted for that of the god. The scepter proclaimed the dominion of the world ; and it held in its hand the globe, emblematic of universal empire. Around the head, instead of rays, were fixed the nails of the true cross. Is tJiis paganism approximating to Christianity, or Christianity degenerating into paganism ? " Milman. ZK We are satisfied that the reader will have no difficulty in answering the question which is here propounded. "It is no more certain that he despised and pitied paganism while he was solemnly offering sacrifices to Jupiter, and winning the admiration and love of the Roman world for his impe- rial piety, than it is certain that he pitied and despised the church of Christ, even while he was manipulating the faith into a sure and reliable support of the empire ; in both courses he only played with the world, giving men any re- ligious toy which the greater part might prefer to have, in 28 Id., par. 7. A MURDERER EVEN IN DEATH. 259 exchange for the liberty of which he robbed them so plausi- bly and successfully that they scarcely perceived his theft, and enthusiastically caressed the royal thief.-' Author of "Arius tlie Libyan." It was the same mixture of pagan and apostate Christian wickedness, the origin and progress of which we have seen in the chapter on "The Falling Away." Nor is the record yet complete. In A. D. 335, in the further exercise of his office of bishop of bishops in the church, Constantine convened the Synod of. Tyre to examine further into some questions that were raised in the trini- tarian controversy. Yet all this time" he was still keeping about him that Sopater who had assisted with the heathen ceremonials at the foundation of Constantinople. Sopater was so openly favored by Constantine that the church party grew jealous and quite alarmed for fear they should lose their emperor altogether. 29 In A. D. 337 Constantine was taken with a serious illness, and being satisfied that he was about to die, he called for an Arian bishop, and was baptized. Then " he was clothed in robes of dazzling whiteness ; his couch was covered with white also : in the white robes of baptism, on a white death- bed, he lay, in expectation of his end. . . . At noon on Whit-Sunday, the 22nd of May, in the sixty-fourth year of his age, and the thirty-first of his reign, he expired. . . . So passed away the first Christian emperor, the first defender of the faith the first imperial patron of the papal see, and of the whole Eastern church, the first founder of tlie holy places, PAGAN AND CHRISTIAN, ORTHODOX AND HERETICAL, LIBERAL AND FANATICAL, not to he imitated or admired, hut much to he remembered, and deeply to he studied." Stanley. His body was inclosed in a coffin of gold and taken in solemn procession to Constantinople, where it la^in state for three months, waiting for his two eldest sons to arrive, the youngest cfnly being present. 29 Id., chap, iv, par. 39. 30 " History of the Eastern Church," end of Lecture vi. 260 THE RELIGION OF CON8TANTINE. And yet the record is not complete. When he was attacked by his last illness he suspected poison, and be- fore he died he gave to the bishop of Nicomedia his will to be handed to his eldest son when he should arrive at Constantinople. The bishop having read it and found its terrible import, put it in the dead emperor's hand, and left it there until Constantius took it. The purport of the instruction was that he believed he had been poisoned by his brothers and their children, and instructed his sons to avenge his death. "That bequest was obeyed by the massacre of six out of the surviving princes of the imperial family. Two alone escaped." Stanley.* 1 As neither Christians nor pagans could tell to which religion Constantine belonged while he was alive, and con- sequently both claimed him, so likewise both claimed him after he was dead : " Even after his death both religions vied, as it were, for Constantine. He received with impartial favor the honors of both. The first Christian emperor was deified by the pagans ; in a latter period he was worshiped as a saint by part of the Christian church. On the same medal appears his title of 'god,' with the monogram, the sacred symbol of Christianity ; in another he is seated in the chariot of the sun, in a car drawn by four horses, with a hand stretched forth from the clouds to raise him to heaven." Milman. 32 Even to this time and to this extent Constantine himself was to blame for his ambiguous position, as he had been all the time he had lived as emperor. He himself had erected a grand church in Constantinople called the Church of the Apostles, which he intended to be his burial place. Further particulars are as follows : "He had in fact made choice of this spot in the prospect of his own death, anticipating with extraordinary fervor of faith that his body would share their tr^e with the apostles themselves, and that he should thus even after death become the subject, with them, of the devotions which 31 Id., Lecture vi, par. 7 from the end. 3a " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, iv, par. 3 from the end. LITTLE BETTER THAN A PAGAN. 261 would be performed to their honor in this place. He accordingly caused twelve coffins to be set up in this church, like sacred pillars in honor and memory of the apostolic number, in the center of which his own was placed, having six of theirs on either side of it." Eusebius. 33 And as had been his practice all the way along, he called this church by a name " truly indicating the mixture of pagan and Christian ideas which led to its erection, the ' HerodnS ' Stanley. The word " Heroon " denotes the temple or chapel of a hero. We have now given the facts simply as we have found them, in regard to Constantine's religious life. We think no one can have the slightest difficulty in deciding that he never was a Christian in any proper sense of the word. We think all must agree "that his progress in the knowledge of Christianity was not a progress in the practice of its virtues ; " that "his love of display and his prodigality, his suspicious- ness and his despotism, increased with his power ; and that the very brightest period of his reign is stained with gross crimes, which even the spirit of the age and the policy of an absolute monarch cannot excuse." SeJiaff All of this is confirmed by another in recording the " fact that he was by general consent, a worse prince at the close of his reign than at its beginning, when he was little better than a pagan." Stanley. The synopsis of the whole question as to what was the religion of Constantine, can be no better expressed than it has already been by another in the following words : "Constantine adopted Christianity first as a superstition, and put it by the side of his heathen superstition, till finally in his conviction the Christian vanquished the pagan, though without itself developing into a pure and enlightened faith." Schaf.* 1 33 "Life of Constantine," book iv, chap. vi. 34 " History of the Eastern Church," Lecture vi, par. 5 from the end. 35 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, g 2, par. 10, 11. 36 "History of the Eastern Church," Lecture vi, par. 26. 37 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, \ 2, par. 6. 262 THE RELIGION OF CON8TANTINE. And the final analysis, the conclusion of the whole matter, the sum of all that has been or that can be said is, that in Constantino the elements of the actual pagan and the apostate Christian were so perfectly mixed as to produce THE TYPICAL PAPIST OF ALL TIMES. HOME DEIFIED. CONSTANTINK. CHAPTER XI. CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. "T^ROM the reading of Chapter VI, it will be remembered L that Diocletian had no sooner abdicated than the system of orderly government which he had established and which he hoped would continue, fell to pieces, and confusion once more ruled in the affairs of state. So far as the government was concerned, the army was now, as it had been for hun- dreds of years, the source of power ;* but among the four' aspiring emperors not only the military force, but the terri- tory of the empire, was almost equally divided. So nearly equal was this division that not one of the emperors had any material advantage over another in this respect. Yet it was the ambition of each one to become sole emperor. It there- fore became a matter of vital concern to each one to obtain whatever power he might, and yet there was no further re- source to be hoped for from the side of the empire. Thus stood matters among the emperors. How was it with the church ? We insert again the quo- tation made from Eusebius concerning the state of things in the churches before the persecution by Diocletian : " When by reason of excessive liberty, we sunk into negligence and sloth, one envying and reviling another in different ways, and we were almost, as it were, on the point of taking up arms against each other, and were assailing each other with words as with darts and spears, prelates inveighing against prelates, and people rising up against people, and hypocrisy and dissimulation had arisen to the greatest height of malig- nity, then the divine judgment, which usually proceeds with a lenient hand, whilst the multitudes were yet crowding into the church, with [ 263] 23 264: CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. gentle and mild visitations began to afflict its episcopacy ; the persecution having begun with those brethren that were in the army. But, as if des- titute of all sensibility, we were not prompt in measures to appease and propitiate the Deity ; some, indeed, like atheists, regarding our situation as unheeded and unobserved by a providence, we added one wickedness and misery to another. But some that appeared to be our pastors, desert- ing the law of piety, were inflamed against each other with mutual strifes, only accumulating quarrels and threats, rivalship, hostility, and hatred to each other, only anxious to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for themselves." The persecution had caused all these divisions and dis- putes to be laid aside. Every other interest was forgotten in the one all-absorbing question of the rights of conscience against pagan despotism. Thus there was created at least an outward unity among all the sects of whatever name, profess- ing the Christian religion in any form. Thus was molded a compact power which permeated every part of the empire, and which was at the same time estranged from every material interest of the empire as it then stood. Here was power which if it could be secured and used, would assure success to him who would gain it, as certainly as he could make the alliance. This condition of affairs was clearly dis- cerned at the time. Constantine ; ' understood the signs of the times and acted accordingly." u To Constantine, who had fled from the treacherous custody of Galerius, it naturally occurred that if he should ally himself to the Christian party, conspicuous advantages must forthwith accrue to him. It would give him in every corner of the empire men and women ready to encounter fire and sword ; it would give him partisans not only ani- mated by the traditions of their fathers, but for human nature will even in the religious assert itself demanding retribution for the horrible barbarities and injustice that had been inflicted on themselves ; it would give him, and this was the most important of all, unwavering adherents in every legion in the army. He took his. course. The events of war crowned him with success. He could not be otherwise THE NEW THEOCRAGJ. 265 than outwardly true to those who had given him power, and who continued to maintain him on the throne." Draper. 1 Constantine was not the only one who saw this oppor- tunity. Maximin likewise detected it, but was distrusted by the church party. Constantine being a much more accom- plished politician, succeeded.' In addition to the advantages which offered themselves in this asserted unity of the churches, there was a movement among the bishops, which made it an additional incentive to Constctntine to form the alliance which he did with the church. Although it is true that all the differences and disputes and strifes among the bishops and sects had been forgotten in the supreme conflict between paganism and freedom of thought, there is one thing mentioned by Eusebius that still remained. That was the ambition of the bishops "to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for themselves." Nor was it alone government in the church which they were anxious to assert ; but government in the State as well, to l)e used in the interests of the church. For, "There had in fact arisen in the church . . ". a false theocratical theory, originating, not in the essence of the gospel, but in the confusion of the religious constitutions of the Old and New Testaments." Neander* This theocratical theory of the bishops is the key to the whole history of Constantine and the church of his time, and through all the dreary period that followed. It led the bishops into the wildest extravagance in their worship of the imperial influence, and coincided precisely with Constantine's idea of an absolute monarchy. The idea of the theocracy that the bishops hoped to establish appears more clearly and fully in Eusebius's "Life of Constantine " than in any other one production of the time. There the whole scheme appears just as they had 1 " Intellectual Development of Europe," chap, ix, par. 22. 2 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. 11, Section Second, part i, div. i, par. 2. 266 CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. created it, and as it was applied in the history of the time. The church was a second Israel in Egyptian bondage. Maxentius was a second Pharaoh, Constantine was a second Moses. As the original Moses had grown up in the palace of the Pharaohs, so likewise his new Moses had grown up in the very society of the new Pharaohs. Thus runs the story : "Ancient history relates that a cruel race of tyrants oppressed the Hebrew nation ; and the God who graciously regarded them in their affliction, provided that the prophet Moses, who was then an infant, should be brought up in the very palaces and bosoms of the oppressors, and instructed in all the wisdom they possessed. And when he had arrived at the age of manhood, and the time was come for divine jus- tice to avenge the wrongs of the afflicted people, then the prophet of God, in obedience to the will of a more powerful Lord, forsook the royal household, and, estranging himself in word and deed from those by whom he had been brought up, openly preferred the society of his true brethren and kinsfolk. And in due time God exalted him to be the leader of the whole nation ; and, after delivering the Hebrews from the bondage of their enemies, inflicted divine vengeance through his means upon the tyrant race. This ancient story, though regarded by too many as fabu- lous, has reached the ears of all. But now the same God has given to us to be eye-witnesses of miracles more wonderful than fables, and, from their recent appearance, more authentic than any report. For the tyrants of our day have ventured to war against the supreme God, and have sorely afflicted his church. And in the midst of these, Constantine, who was shortly to become their destroyer, but at that time of tender age, and blooming with the down of early youth, dwelt, as God's servant Moses had done, in the very home of the tyrants. Young, however, as he was, he shared not in the pursuits of the impious : for from that early period his noble nature (under the leading of the Divine Spirit), inclined him to a life of piety and acceptable service to God." Eusebius. 3 We have related how Galerius sought to prevent Con- stantine's joining his father in Britain ; and how Con- stantine succeeded in eluding his vigilance. By the theo- cratical bishops this was made to be the flight of the new Moses from the wrath of the new Pharaohs. Thus the story continues : 8 " Life of Constantino," book i, chap. xii. THE NEW ISRAEL DELIVERED. 267 "The emperors then in power, who observed his manly and vigorous figure and superior mind with feelings of jealousy and fear, . . . care- fully watched for an opportunity of inflicting some brand of disgrace on his character. But he, being aware of their designs (the details of which, through the providence of God, were more than once laid open to his view), sought safety in flight, and in this respect his conduct still affords a parallel to that of the great prophet Moses." Eusebius.* As the original Moses, without the interposition of any human agency, had been called to the work to which the Lord had appointed him, so the theocratical bishops had the new Moses likewise appointed directly by the authority of God : - "Thus, then, the God of all, the supreme Governor of the world, by his own will, appointed Constantino, the descendant of so renowned a parent, to be prince and sovereign : so that, while others have been raised to this distinction by the election of their fellow-men, he is the only one to whose elevation no mortal may boast of having contributed." Eusebius. 5 Eusebius knew as well as any other man in the empire that the legions in Britain had proclaimed Constantine em- peror, precisely as the armies had been doing in like in- stances for more than a hundred years. .He knew full well that Constantine held his title to the imperial power by the same tenure precisely as had all the emperors Defore him from the accession of Claudius. In short, when the bishop Eusebius wrote this statement, he knew that he was writing a downright lie. When Constantine marched against Maxentius, it was the new Moses on his way to deliver Israel. When the army of Maxentius was defeated and multitudes were drowned in the river, it was the Red Sea swallowing up the hosts of Pharaoh. When Maxentius was crowded off the bridge and by the weight of his armor sank instantly to the bottom of the river, it was the new Pharaoh and "the horse and his rider" be- ing thrown into the sea and sinking to the bottom like a stone. */<#., chap. xx. 5 /d!., chap. xxlv. 268 CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. Then was Israel delivered, and a song of deliverance was sung by the new Israel as by the original Israel at their deliv- erance. Thus the story continues : "And now those miracles recorded in Holy Writ, which God of old wrought against the ungodly (discredited by most as fables, yet believed by the faithful), did he in very deed confirm to all, alike believers and unbe- lievers, who were eye-witnesses to the wonders I am about to relate. For as once in the days of Moses and the Hebrew nation, who were worshipers of God, he cast Pharaoh's chariots and his host into the waves, and drowned his chosen chariot-captains in the Red Sea, so at this time did Maxentius, and the soldiers and guards with him, sink to the bottom as a stone, when, in his flight before the divinely aided forces of Constantine, he essayed to cross the river which lay in his way, over which he had made a strong bridge of boats, and had framed an engine of destruction, really against himself, but in the hope of ensnaring thereby him who was be- loved of God. For his God stood by the one to protect him, while the other, destitute of his aid, proved to be the miserable contriver of these secret devices to his own ruin. So that one might well say, ' He made a pit, and digged it, and shall fall into the ditch which he made. His mis- chief shall return upon his own head, and his iniquity shall come down upon his own pate.' Thus, in the present instance, under divine direc- tion, the machine erected on the bridge, with the ambuscade concealed therein, giving way unexpectedly before the appointed time, the passage began to sink down, and the boats with the men in them went bodily to the bottom. At first the wretch himself, then his armed attendants and guards, even as the sacred oracles had before described, ' sank as lead in the mighty waters.' So that they who thus obtained victory from God might well, if not in the same words, yet in fact in the same spirit as the people of his great servant Moses, sing and speak as they did concerning the impious tyrant of old : ' Let us sing unto the Lord, for he has been glorified exceedingly : the horse and his rider has he thrown into the sea. He is become my helper and my shield unto salvation.' And again, ' Who is like to thee, O Lord, among the gods ? who is like thee, glori- ous in holiness, marvelous in praises, doing wonders ?'" fJusebius. 6 Such adulation was not without response on the part of Constantine. He united himself closely with the bishops, of whom Eusebius was but one, and, in his turn, flattered them : - 6 Jrf., chap, xxxvfii. FINAL WAR WITH L1CINIUS. 269 " The emperor was also accustomed personally to invite the society of God's ministers, whom he distinguished with the highest possible re- spect and honor, treating them in every sense as persons consecrated to the service of God. Accordingly, they were admitted to his table, though mean in their attire and outward appearance ; yet not so in his estima- tion, since he judged not of their exterior as seen by the vulgar eye, but thought he discerned in them somewhat of the character of God him- self." EusebiusJ 1 This worked charmingly. Throughout the empire the courtly bishops worked in Constantino's interest ; and as Licinius only now remained between Constantino and his longed-for position as sole emperor and absolute ruler, the bishops and their political church-followers prayed against Licinius and for Constantine. As these "worldly-minded bishops, instead of caring for the salvation of their flocks, were often but too much inclined to travel about and entangle themselves in worldly concerns " (Neander s ), Licinius attempted to check it. To stop their meddling with the political affairs of his dominions, he forbade the bishops to assemble together or to pass from their own dioceses to others. He enacted that women should be instructed only by women ; that in their assemblies the men and the women should sit separate ; and commanded that they of Nicomedia should meet outside the city, as the open air was more healthful for such large assemblies. This only tended to make the bishops more active, as the acts of Licinius could be counted as persecution. Licinius next went so far as to remove from all public office whoever would not sacrifice to the gods, and the line was quickly drawn once more in his dominion in favor of paganism. This caused Constantino's party to put on a bolder face, and they not only prayed for Constantine against Licinius, but they began to invent visions in which they pretended to 7 Id., chap. xlii. 8 "History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section First, part 1, div. A, par. 26. 270 CON8TANTINE AND TEE BISHOPS. see the "legions of Constantino marching victoriously through the streets at midday." Neander* These enactments on the part of Licinius furnished the new Moses with an opportunity to conquer the heathen in the wilderness, and to go on to the possession of the prom- ised land and the full establishment of the new theocracy. War was declared, % and Constantine, with the labarum at the head of his army, took up his march toward the dominions of Licinius. Another step was now taken in furtherance of the theo- cratical idea, and in imitation of the original Moses. It will be remembered that, after the passage of the Red Sea, Moses erected a tabernacle, and pitched it afar off from the camp, where he went to consult the Lord and to receive what the Lord had to give in commandment to Israel. Constantine, to sustain his part in this scheme of a new theocracy, and as far as possible to conform to the theocratical plans of the bishops, likewise erected a tabernacle, and pitched it a con- siderable distance from his camp. To this tabernacle he would repair and pretend to have visions and communica- tions from the Lord, and to receive directions in regard to his expected battles with Licinius. The original account is as follows : "In this manner Licinius gave himself up to these impieties, and rushed blindly towards the gulf of destruction. But as soon as the emperor was aware that he must meet his enemies in a second battle, he applied himself in earnestness to the worship of his Saviour. He pitched the tabernacle of the cross outside and at a distance from his camp, and there passed his time in pure and holy seclusion, and in offering up prayers to God ; following thus the example of his ancient prophet, of whom the sacred oracles testify that he pitched the tabernacle without the camp. He was attended only by a few, of whose faith and piety, as well as affection to his person, he was well assured. And this custom he continued to observe whenever he meditated an engagement with the enemy. For he was deliberate in his measures, the better to insure safety, and desired in everything to be directed by divine counsel. And since his prayers ascended with fervor and earnestness to God, he was 9 ld. t Section First, part i, dlv. A, par. 27. ORIGINAL STATE CHAPLAINCIES. always honored with a manifestation of his presence. And then, as if moved by a divine impulse, he would rush from the tabernacle, and sud- denly give orders to his army to move at once without delay, and on the instant to draw their swords. On this they would immediately commence the attack, with great and general slaughter, so as with incredible celerity to secure the victory, and raise trophies in token of the overthrow of their enemies." Eusebius. 10 He soon carried this matter somewhat farther, and pro- vided a tabernacle in each legion, with attendant priests and deacons, and also another which was constructed in the form of a church, "so that in case he or his army might be led into the desert, they might have a sacred edifice in which to praise and worship God, and participate in the mysteries. Priests and deacons followed the tent for the purpose of offi- ciating therein, according to the law and regulations of the church. " Sozomen. n Such was the original establishment of state chaplaincies. And it is but proper to remark that the system, wherever copied, has always been worthy of the original imposture. The outcome of the war between Constantine and Licinius we have already related ; also his murder of Licinius. And when, in violation of his solemn oath to his sister Constantia, Constantine caused Licinius to be executed, the courtier- bishop justified the wicked transaction as being the lawful execution of the will of God upon the enemy of God. Thus he speaks : " He then proceeded to deal with this adversary of God and his followers according to the laws of war, and consign them to the fate which their crimes deserved. Accordingly the tyrant himself [Licinius] and they whose counsels had supported him in his impiety, were together subjected to the just punishment of death. After this, those who had so lately been deceived by their vain confidence in false deities, acknowledged with unfeigned sincerity the God of Constantine, and openly professed their belief in him as the true and only God." 10 " Life of Constantine," book ii, chap xil. 11 "Ecclesiastical History," book I, chap. viH. 18 " Life of Constantine," book ii, chap, xviii. 272 GONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. When Constantine went to take his seat as presiding officer in the Council of Nice, his theocratical flatterers pre- tended to be dazzled by his splendor, as though an angel of God had descended straight from heaven, and he who sat at Constantine's right hand that day, thus testifies : "And now, all rising at the signal which indicated the emperor's en- trance, at last he himself proceeded through the midst of the assembly, like some heavenly messenger of God." Eusebius. 13 Constantine, to sustain his part in the farce, declared openly in the council that " the crimes of priests ought not to be made known to the multitude, lest they should become an occasion of offense or of sin ; " and that if he should detect " a bishop in the very act of committing adultery," he would throw "his imperial robe over the unlawful deed, lest any should witness the scene," and be injured by the bad exam- ple." -Tkeodoret. And when the council was closed and the creed for which they had come together was established, he sent a letter to the " Catholic Church of the Alexandrians," in which he announced that the conclusions reached by the coun- cil were inspired by the Holy Spirit, and could be none other than the divine will concerning the doctrine of God. After the council was over, he gave a banquet in honor of the twentieth year of his reign, to which he invited the bishops and clergy who had attended the council. The bishops responded by pretending that it seemed to be the very likeness of the kingdom of Christ itself. The de- scription is as follows : "The emperor himself invited and feasted with those ministers of .God whom he had reconciled, and thus offered as it were through them a suitable sacrifice to God. Not one of the bishops was wanting at the imperial banquet, the circumstances of which were splendid beyond description. Detachments of the body guard and other troops sur- rounded the entrance of the palace with drawn swords, and through the midst of these the men of God proceeded without fear into the innermost of the imperial apartments, in which some were the emperor's own com- panions at table, while others reclined on couches arranged on either side. 13 7d., book iii, chap. x. u "Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap, xi. THE BISHOPS AND THE EMPEROR. 273 One might have thought that a picture of Christ's kingdom was thus shad- owed forth, and that the scene was less like reality than a dream. " Eusebius. 15 At the banquet "the emperor himself presided, and as the feast went on, called to himself one bishop after another, and loaded each with -gifts in proportion to his deserts." This so delighted the bishops that one of them James of Nisibis, a member of that monkish tribe who habitually lived on grass, browsing like oxen, was wrought up to such a height that he declared he saw angels standing round the emperor. Constantine, not to- be outdone, saw angels stand- ing around James, and pronounced him one of the three pillars of the world. He said, "There are three pillars of the world ; Antony in Egypt, Nicolas of Myra, James in Assyria." 16 Another instance of this mutual cajolery is given con- cerning Eusebius and the emperor as follows : " One act, however, I must by no means omit to record, which this admirable prince performed in my own presence. On one occasion, emboldened by the confident assurance I entertained of his piety, I had begged permission to pronounce a discourse on the subject of our Saviour's sepulcher in his hearing. With this request he most readily complied, and in the midst of a large number of auditors, in the interior of the palace itself, he stood and listened with the rest. I entreated him (but in vain) to seat himself on the imperial throne which stood near : he continued with fixed attention to weigh the topics of my discourse, and gave his own testimony to the truth of the theological doctrines it contained. After some time had passed, the oration being of consider- able length, I was myself desirous of concluding ; but this he would not permit, and exhorted me to proceed td the very end. On my again entreating him to sit, he in his turn admonished me to desist, saying it was not right to listen in a careless manner to the discussion of doctrines relating to God ; and again, that this posture was good and profitable to himself, since it argued a becoming reverence to stand while listening to sacred truths. Having, therefore concluded my discourse, I returned home, and resumed my usual occupations." Eusebius. 17 16 "Life of Constantine," book iii, chap. 15. 16 Stanley, "History of the Eastern Church," Lecture v, par. 34. 17 "Life of Constantine," book iv, chap, xxxiii. 274 CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. Oonstantine himself occasionally appeared in the role of preacher also. " On these occasions a general invitation was issued, and thousands of people went to the palace to hear an emperor turned preacher " (Stanley 18 ) ; they were ready at the strong points to respond with loud applause and cheering. At times he would attack his courtiers for their rapacity and worldliness generally, and they, understanding him perfectly, would cheer him loudly for his preaching, and go on in the same old way imitating his actions. Again : when his mother sent the nails of the true cross to him from Jerusalem with the instruction that some of them should be used as bridle bits for his war-horse, it was counted a further evidence that the kingdom of God was come ; for it was made to be the fulfillment of that which " Zacha- riah the prophet predicted, ' that what is upon the bridles of the horses shall be holiness unto the Lord Almighty." Theodoret. And when he appointed his sons and nephews as Csesars to a share in the governmental authority, this was made to be a fulfillment of the prophecy of Daniel vii, 17, " The saints of the Most High shall take the kingdom ! " Yet more than this : Eusebius actually argued that the emperor- s dining hall might be the New Jerusalem described in the book of Revelation. 20 And at the celebration of the thirtieth year of his reign, another of the bishops was so carried away with the imperial honors conferred upon him, that he went so far as to declare that Constantine had been constituted by God to rule over all in the present world, and was destined also by the Lord to reign with the Son of God in the world to come. This, it seems, was rather too much even for Constantine, and he exhorted the gushing bishop not to use such language any more ; but instead to pray for him that he might be accounted worthy to be a servant 18 " History of the Eastern Church," Lecture vi, par. 24. 19 " Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap, xviil. 20 " Encyclopedia Britannica," article "Millennium." CONSTANTINE SENT TO HEAVEN. 375 of God, rather than joint ruler, in the world to come. Eusebius.* 1 But after he was dead, and therefore unable to put any check upon the extravagance of their adulation, Eu- sebius pretended to hesitate as to whether it would not be committing gross sacrilege to attempt to write his life. However, he finally concluded to venture upon it. Some of his statements we have already given ; but there are a few more that should be reproduced in this connection. Refer- ring to Constantino's lying in state so long before his sons assumed the imperial authority, he says : "No mortal had ever, like this blessed prince, continued to reign even after his death, and to receive the same homage as during his life : he only, of all who have ever lived, obtained this reward from God : a suitable reward, since he alone of all sovereigns had in all his actions honored the supreme God and his Christ, and God himself accordingly was pleased that even his mortal remains should still retain imperial authority among men." 21 This was not enough, however. It must needs be that God should set him forth as the pattern of the human race : "And God himself, whom Constantine worshiped, has confirmed this truth by the clearest manifestations of his will, being present to aid him at the commencement, during the course, and at the end of his reign, and holding him up to the human race as an exemplary pattern of godliness." 23 Next, he seeks some object worthy to be a standard of comparison for "this marvelous man." But he is unable to find any such thing or person but the Saviour himself. Therefore he declares : "We cannot compare him with that bird of Egypt, the only one, as they say, of its kind, which dies, self-sacrificed, in the midst of aromatic perfumes, and, rising from its own ashes, with new life soars aloft in the same form which it had before. Rather did he resemble his Saviour, 81 " Life of Constantine," book iv. chap, xlviii. 22 Id., book iv, chap. Ixvii. 23 7d., book i, chap. iv. 276 CONSTANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. who, as the sown corn which is multiplied from a single grain, had yielded abundant increase through the blessing of God, and had over- spread the world with his fruit. Even so did our thrice blessed prince become multiplied, as it were, through the succession of his sons. His statue was erected along with theirs in every province ; and the name of Constantine was owned and honored even after the close of his mortal life." 24 But even this does not- satisfy the aspirations of the episcopal adulator. The task is now become one of such grandeur as to transcend all his powers ; he stops amazed, and in impotence resigns it all to Christ, who only, he professes, is worthy to do the subject justice : "For to whatever quarter I direct my view, whether to the east, or to the west, or over the whole world, or toward .heaven itself, I see the blessed emperor everywhere present ; . . . and I see him still living and powerful, and governing the general interests of mankind more com- pletely than ever before, being multiplied as it were by the succession of his children to the imperial power. . . . "And I am indeed amazed when I consider that he who was but lately visible and present with us in his mortal body, is still, even after death, when the natural thought disclaims all superfluous distinctions as unsuitable, most marvelously endowed with the same imperial dwellings, and honors, and praises, as heretofore. But further, when I raise my thoughts even to the arch of heaven, and there contemplate his thrice blessed soul in communion with God himself, freed from eveiy mortal and earthly vesture, and shining in a refulgent robe of light ; and when I perceive that it is no more connected with the fleeting periods and occupations of mortal life, but honored with an ever-blooming crown, and an immortality of endless and blessed existence ; I stand as it were entranced and deprived of all power of utterance : and so, while I con- demn my own weakness, and impose silence on myself, I resign the task of speaking his praises worthily to one who is better able, even to him who alone has power (being the immortal God the Word) to confirm the truth of his own sayings." 25 All this with much more to the same puipose is set forth by that bishop who above all others is entitled " one of the best among the bishops of Constantino's court," and the one 24 Id., book iv, chap. Ixxii. 25 Id., book i, chaps, i, ii. THE MYSTERY OF INIQUITY. 277 who ' ' cannot be reckoned among the number of the ordinary court bishops of his period." Neander By the plain, unbiased facts of history, Constantine stands before the world as a confirmed and constant hypocrite, a perjurer, and a many-times murderer. And yet this bishop, knowing all this, hesitates not to declare him the special favorite of God ; to liken him to Jesus Christ ; to make God indorse him to the human race as an example of godliness ; and to exalt him so high that no one but "the immortal God " can worthily speak his praises ! When one of the best of the bishops of his court, one who was familiar with the whole course of his evil life, could see in the life and actions of such a man as this, a Moses, and angels, and the New Jerusalem, and the kingdom of God, and even the Lord Christ- when in such a life, all this could be seen by one of the best of the bishops, we can only wonderingly inquire what could not be seen there by the worst of the bishops ! Can any one wonder, or can any reasonable person 'dis- pute, that from a mixture composed of such bishops and such a character, there should come the mystery of iniquity in all its hideous enormity f NOTE ON CONSTANTINE S VISION OF THE CROSS. It will be observed that in this account of Constantino nothing has been said about his "vision of the cross," of which so much h;is been said by almost every other writer who has gone over this ground. For this there are two main reasons. First, There is no point in the narrative where it could have been in- troduced, even though it were true. Second, The whole story is so manifestly a lie that it is unworthy of serious notice in any narrative that makes any preten- sions to truth or soberness. There is no point at which such an account could be inserted, because nobody ever heard of it until "long after" it was said to have occurred ; and then it was made known by Constantine himself to Eusebius only, and was never made a matter of record until after Constautine's death. 26 " History of the Christian Keligion and Church," Vol. ii, Section First, part i, <"iv. A, par. 45, note. 278 CON8TANTINE AND THE BISHOPS. These things of themselves would go far to discredit the story; but when it is borne in mind that the only record that was even then made of it was in Eusebius's " Life of Constantine," the character of which is quite clearly seen in the extracts which we have made from it in this chapter, the story may be entirely discredited. Eusebius's words are as follows : "While he was thus praying with fervent entreaty, a most marvelous sign appeared to him from heaven, the account of which it might have been difficult to receive with credit, had it been related by any other person. But since the victorious emperor himself long afterwards declared it to the writer of this history, when he was honored with his acquaintance and society, and confirmed his statement by an oath, who could hesitate to accredit the relation, especially since the testimony of after-time has established its truth? " 27 It will be seen at once that this account is of the same nature as that of Eusebius's " Life of Constantine " throughout. It is of the same piece with that by which " no mortal was allowed to contribute to the elevation of Constantine." If it should be pleaded that Constantine confirmed his statement by an oath, the answer is that this is no evidence of the truth of the statement. " That the emperor attested it on oath, as the historian tells us, is indeed no additional guarantee for the emperor's veracity." Stanley. z& He gave his oath to his sister as a pledge for the life of her husband, and shortly had him killed. In short, when Constantine confirmed a statement, by an oath, this was about the best evidence that he could give that the statement was a lie. This is the impression clearly conveyed by Stanley's narrative, as may be seen by a comparison of Lecture iii, par. 11; Lecture iv, par. 9; Lecture vi, par. 10, and is sustained by the evidence of Constantine's whole imperial course. In addition to this, there is the fact that Eusebius himself only credited the story because it came from Constantine, and because it was established " by the testimony of after-time," in which testimony he was ever ready to see the most wonderful evidence of God's special regard for Constantine; and the further fact that it was one of the principles of Eusebius that " it may be lawful and fitting to use falsehood as a medicine, for the advantage of those who require such a method," 29 which principle is fully illustrated in his dealings with Constantine. When all these things, and many others which might be mentioned, are fairly considered, they combine to make the story of Constantine's vision of the cross, utterly unworthy of the slightest credit, or any place, in any sober or exact his- tory. Therefore I do, and all others ought to, fully concur in the opinion that this " flattering fable " " can claim no place among the authentic records of his- tory; and by writers whose only object is truth, it may very safely be consigned to contempt and oblivion." Waddington. 30 27 " Life of Constantine," book i, chap, xxviii. 28 " History of the Eastern Church," Lecture vi, par. 10. 29 Quoted by Waddington in " Note on Eusebius," at the end of chapter yi, of his "History of the Church." 80 " History of the Church," chap, vi, par. 3. CHAPTER XII. THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. T F the mutual flattery of Constantino and the bishops had i concerned only themselves, it would have been a matter of very slight importance indeed ; but this was not so. Each side represented an important interest. Constantine merely represented the State, and the bishops the church ; and their mutual flattery was only the covering of a deep laid and far reaching scheme which each party was determined to work to the utmost, for its own interests. "It was the aim of Constantine to make theology a branch of politics ; it was the hope of every bishop in the empire to make politics a branch of theology." Draper. 1 Consequently, in their mutual toadyism were involved the interests of both the Church and the State, and the welfare of human society for ages to come. Therefore, ' ' To the reign of Constantine the Great must be referred the commencement of those dark and dismal times which oppressed Europe for a thousand years. It is the true close of the Roman empire, the beginning of the Greek. The transition from one to the other is emphatically and abruptly marked by a new metropolis, a new religion, a new code, and, above all, a new policy. An ambitious man had attained to imperial power by personating the interests of a rapidly growing party. The unavoidable consequences were a union between the Church and the State, a diverting 1 " Intellectual Development of Europe," chap, x, par. 6. 24 [279] 280 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. of the dangerous classes from civil to ecclesiastical paths, and the decay and materialization of religion." -Draper.* To set forth the true account of the seed that was sown in the workings of this mutual intrigue, and to indicate certain inevitable fruits thereof, must now employ our thoughts. As we are to consider acts which were very far-reaching, and trace their consequences, we shall follow to its logical results each special act as it occurs, before noticing the next one. When the alliance was formed between Constantine and what was represented to him as Christianity, it was with the idea on his part that this religion formed a united body throughout the empire. As has been shown, this was true in a certain sense, because the persecution as carried on by Galerius under the edicts of Diocletian, was against Chris- tianity as a profession, without any distinction whatever as to its phases, and this caused all the different sects to stand together as one in defense of the principles that were com- mon to all. Therefore the essential unity of all the profes- sions of Christianity he supposed to be a fact ; and from all his actions and writings afterward it is certain that represen- tations had been made to him by the bishops in a stronger measure than was true, and in an infinitely stronger measure than he found it in practice to be. As has also been shown, the alliance with Christianity on his part was wholly political, and merely a part of the polit- ical machinery by which he designed to bring together again the divided elements of the empire into one harmonious whole, as contemplated by Diocletian. It being represented to him by the bishops who met him in Gaul in A. D. 311, that Christianity was a united body which, if he would support it, would in turn be a powerful support to him, he accepted their representations as the truth, and formed the alliance solely as a part of his political designs, and to help him to forward his declared "mission to unite the world under one head." 8 Id., chap, ix, par. 24, A FALSE UNITY. 281 But an apparent unity upon the grand principles common to all sects of Christianity, created by a defense of the rights of Christians to believe and to worship according to the dictates of their own conscience, and a real unity which would stand together in Christian brotherhood under the blandishments of imperial favor, were two very different things. It was easy enough for all the sects in which Christianity claimed at that time to be represented, to stand together against an effort of the imperial power to crush out of existence the very name, as well as the right to profess it. It was not so easy for these same denominations to stand together as one, representing the charity and unifying influence of Christianity, when imperial support, imperial influence, and imperial power, were the prizes to be gained. Therefore, although the alliance was formed with what was supposed to be Christianity as a whole, without any respect to internal divisions, it was very soon discovered that each particular faction of the Christian profession was ambitious to be recognized as the one in which, above all others, Christianity was most certainly represented. The bishops were ready and willing to represent to Constantine that Christianity was one. They did so represent it to him. And although he entered the alliance with that understand- ing, the alliance had no sooner been well formed than it devolved upon him to decide among the conflicting factions and divisions just where that one was to be found. The Edict of Milan ordered that the church property which had been confiscated by the -edicts of Diocletian, should be restored to "the whole body of Christians," with- out any distinction as to particular sects or names. Thus runs that part of the edict : - "And this we further decree, with respect to the Christians, that the places in which they were formerly accustomed to assemble, concerning which also we formerly wrote to your fidelity, in a different form, that if any persons have purchased these, either from our treasury, or from any other one, these shall restore them to the Christians, without money and 282 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. without demanding any price, without any superadded value or augmen- tation, without delayer hesitancy. And if any have happened to receive these places as presents, that they shall restore them as soon as possible to the Christians, so that if either those that purchased or those that received them as presents, have anything to request of our munificence, they may go to the provincial governor, as the judge ; that provision may also be made for them by our clemency. All which it will be necessary to be delivered up to the body of Christians, by your care, without any delay. "And since the Christians themselves are known to have had not only those places where they were accustomed to meet, but other places also, belonging not to individuals among them, but to the right of the whole body of Christians, you will also command all these, by virtue of the law before mentioned, without any hesitancy, to be restored to these same Christians, that is, to their body, and to each conventicle respect- ively. The aforesaid consideration, to wit, being observed ; namely, that they who -as we have said restore them without valuation and price, may expect their indemnity from our munificence and liberality. In all which it will be incumbent on you, to exhibit your exertions as much as possible to the aforesaid body of Christians, that our orders may be most speedily accomplished, that likewise in this provision may be made by our clemency, for the preservation of the common and public tranquillity. For by these means,, as before said, the divine favor with regard to us, which we have already experienced in many affairs, will continue firm and permanent at all times. " But that the purpose of this our ordinance and liberality may be extended to the knowledge of all, it is expected that these things written, by us, should be proposed and published to the knowledge of all. That this act of our liberality and kindness may remain unknown to none." 3 This was proper enough in itself. But Constantine and the bishops had formed an alliance for political purposes. The bishops had lent to Constantine their support, the fruit of which he was enjoying ; and now they demanded that the expected return should be rendered. Accordingly, the res- toration of the property of the Christians, under the Edict of Milan, had no sooner begun, than the contentions which had been raised before the late persecution, between the church of Rome and the churches of Africa, were not only made to assume new and political significance, but were 3 Eusebius's "Ecclesiastical History," book x, chap. v. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ESTABLISHED. 283 made an issue upon which to secure the imperial recognition and the legal establishment of the Catholic Church. As the rule had already been established that all who did not agree with the bishops of the Catholic Church were necessarily heretics, and not Christians, it was now claimed by the Catholic Church that therefore none such could be par- takers of the benefits of the edict restoring property to the Christians. The Catholic Church disputed the right of heretics to receive property or money under the Edict of Milan, by disputing their right to the title of Christians. This forced an imperial decision upon the question as to who were Christians. The dispute w r as raised in Africa. Anulinus was proconsul in that province. To settle this Question, Constantine issued the following edict : "Hail, our most esteemed Anulinus : This is the course of our benevolence ; that we wish those things that belong justly to others, should not only remain unmolested, but should also, when necessary, be restored, most esteemed Anulinus. Whence it is our will, that when thou shall receive this epistle, if any of those things belonging to the Catholic Church of the Christians in the several cities or other places, are now possessed either by the decurions, or any others, these thou shalt cause immediately to be restored to their churches. Since we have pre- viously determined, that whatsoever these same churches before possessed, shall be restored to their right. When, therefore, your fidelity has understood this decree of our orders to be most evident and plain, make all haste to restore, as soon as possible, all that belongs to the churches, whether gardens or houses, or anything else, that we may learn thou hast attended to, and most carefully observed, this our decree. Farewell, most esteemed and beloved Anulinus," * By this it was made evident that the imperial favors were only for the Catholic Church. Nor was it enough that Con- stantine should decide that all his favors were for the Cath- olic Church ; he must next decide which was the CatJwlic Church. This was brought about by a division which was created in the church at Carthage, having its origin in the late persecution. 284: THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATS. The edict issued by Diocletian had commanded the magis- trates everywhere to compel the Christians to deliver up the Scriptures. Some Christians did so ; others refused and suffered all kinds of punishments rather than to do so. "When Constantine formed his alliance with the bishops, Mensurius was bishop of Carthage, and some of his ene- mies had falsely accused him of being one of those who had delivered up the Scriptures rather than to suffer. They were supported by a certain Donatus, bishop of a city in Numidia, and they separated themselves from com- munion with Mensurius. When Mensurius died,, as the "primacy of the African church was the object of am- bition to these two parties " (Mil-man 5 ), and as this prim- acy carried with it imperial patronage, there were several candidates. A certain Csecilianus was elected, however, "in spite of the cabals and intrigues of Botrus and Csele- sius, two chief presbyters who aspired to that dignity." .Bower. 6 Botrus and Cselesius were now joined by Donatus and his party, and these all were further joined and supported by a certain Lucilla, a woman of great qualities, wealth, and interest, and an avowed enemy to Caecilianus. This faction gathered together about seventy of the bishops of Numidia for the purpose of deposing Caecilianus as one having been illegally chosen. When they came together at Carthage, they found that the great majority of the people were in favor of Csecilianus ; but they went ahead, nevertheless. They summoned him to the council. He refused to go, and it was well that he did so, because one of them had already said of him, " If he comes among us, instead of laying our hands on him by way of ordination, we ought to knock out his brains by w r ay of penance."- Bower. 1 A council com- posed of men of this character, it is easy to believe, were readily susceptible to whatever influence might be brought 5 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 10 from the end. 6 " History of the Popes," Melchiades, par. 2. 7 /d., par. 3. WHICH IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? 285 to bear upon them to bring them to a decision. Lucilla, by the free use of money, succeeded in persuading them to declare the election of Csecilianus void, and the bishopric of Carthage vacant. They pronounced him and all who held with him separated from their communion, and proceeded to elect and ordain a certain Majorinus, who had formerly been one of Lucilla's servants, but was now a reader in the church. Thus stood matters in the church in Africa when in March, A. D. 313, Constantine sent to the proconsul Anulinus the following edict : "Health to thee, most esteemed Anulinus. As it appears from many circumstances that when the religion was despised, in which the highest reverence of the heavenly Majesty is observed, that our public affairs were beset with great dangers, and that this religion, when legally adopted and observed, afforded the greatest prosperity to the Roman name, and distinguished felicity to all men, as it has been granted by the divine beneficence, we have resolved that those men who gave their services with becoming sanctity, and the observance of thia law, to the performance of divine worship, should receive the recompense for their labors, most esteemed Anulinus ; wherefore it is my will that these men, within the province intrusted to thee in the Catholic Church, over which Cacilianus presides, who give their services to this holy religion, and whom they commonly call clergy, shall be held totally free and exempt from all public offices, to the end that they may not, by any error or sacri- legious deviation, be drawn away from the service due to the Divinity, but rather may devote themselves to their proper law, without any molestation. So that, whilst they exhibit the greatest possible reverence to the Deity, it appears the greatest good will be conferred on the State. Farewell, most esteemed and beloved Anulinus. " 8 As will be seen later, tlys exemption was a most material benefit. And when the party of Majorinus saw themselves excluded. from it, they claimed that they were the Catholic Church, and therefore really the ones who were entitled to it. Accordingly, they drew up a petition to the emperor, entitled, "The petition of the Catholic Church, containing the crimes of Caecilianus, by the party of Majorinus." Bowet\ 9 This 8 Eusebius's "Ecclesiastical History," book x, chap. vii. 8 "History of the Popes," Melchiades, par. 5. 286 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. petition requested the emperor to refer to the bishops of Gaul the controversy between them and Caecilianus. The petition, with a bundle of papers containing their charges against Caecilianus, they gave to the proconsul Anulinus, who immediately sent it by a messenger to Constantine, and sent also by the same messenger a letter giving him an account of the dispute. When Constantine received the petition and the accompanying papers, he appointed three of the principal bishops of Gaul to meet with the bishop of Rome to examine the matter, and sent to Melchiades, the then bishop of Rome, the following letter : " Constantine Augustus, to Miltiades [ the same as Melchiades], bishop of Rome, and to Marcus : As many communications of this kind have been sent to me from Anulinus, the most illustrious proconsul of Africa, in which it is contained that Csecilianus, the bishop of Carthage, was accused, in many respects, by his colleagues in Africa ; and as this ap- pears to be grievous, that in those provinces which divine Providence has freely intrusted to my fidelity, and in which there is a vast popula- tion, the multitude are found inclining to deteriorate, and in a manner divided into two parties, and among others, that the bishops were at variance ; I have resolved that the same Csecilianus, together with ten bishops, who appear to accuse him, and ten others, whom he himself may consider necessary for his cause, shall sail to Rome. That you, being present there, as also Reticius, Maternus, and Marinus, your colleagues, whom I have commanded to hasten to Rome for this purpose, may be heard, as you may understand most consistent with the most sacred law. And, indeed, that you may have the most perfect knowledge of these matters. I have subjoined to my own epistle copies of the writings sent to me by Anulinus, and sent them to your aforesaid colleagues. In which your gravity will read and consider in what way the aforesaid cause may be most accurately investigated and justly decided. Since it neither escapes your diligence, that I show such regard for the holy Catholic Church, that I wish you, upon the whole, to leave no room for schism or division. May the power of the great God preserve you many years, most esteemed." 10 % Several other bishops besides those named in this letter were appointed by. the emperor to attend the council, so that when the council met, there were nineteen members of it. 10 Eusebius's "Ecclesiastical History," book x, chap. v. COUNCILS TO DECIDE THE QUESTION. 287 According to Constantino's letter, as well as by virtue of his own position, Melchiades presided in the council, and thus began to reap in imperial recognition and joint authority, the fruit of the offers which he made when in A. D. 311 he sent that letter and delegation of bishops to Constantino in Gaul, inviting him to the conquest of Rome and the deliverance of the church. The council met in the apartments of the empress, in the Lateran Palace in Rome, October 2, 313. Caecilianus ap- peared in person, and Donatus came as his accuser. The council decided that none of the . charges were proved, pro- nounced Caecilianus innocent, and Donatus a slanderer and the chief author of all the contention. Their decision, with a full account of the proceedings, was immediately sent to Constantirie. The Donatists appealed from the council to the emperor, demanding a larger council, on the plea that the bishops who composed this one were partial, prejudiced, and had acted hastily, and, besides this, were too few in num- ber properly to decide a matter of so great importance. Constantine ordered another council to be held at Aries, to be composed of "many bishops." The following is the let- ter he sent to one of the bishops who was summoned to Aries, and will show his wishes in the matter : "Constantine Augustus, to Chrestus, bishop of Syracuse : As there were some already before who perversely and wickedly began to waver in the holy religion and celestial virtue, and to abandon the doctrine of the Catholic Church, desirous, therefore, of preventing such disputes among them, I had thus written, that this subject, which appeared to be agitated among them, might be rectified, by delegating certain bishops from Gaul, and summoning others of the opposite parties from Africa, who are pertinaciously and incessantly contending with one another, that by a careful examination of the matter in their presence, it might thus be decided. But since, as it happens, some, forgetful of their own salvation, and the reverence due to our most holy religion, even now do not cease to protract their own enmity, being unwilling to conform to the decision already promulgated, and asserting that they were very few that advanced their sentiments and opinions, or else that all points which 288 TEE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. ought to have been first fully discussed not being first examined, they proceeded with too much haste and precipitancy to give publicity to the decision. Hence it has happened that those very persons who ought to exhibit a brotherly and peaceful unanimity, rather disgracefully and de- testably are at variance with one another, and thus give this occasion of derision to those that are without, and whose minds are averse to our most holy religion. Hence it has appeared necessary to me to provide that this matter, which ought to have ceased after the decision was issued by their own voluntary agreement, now, at length, should be fully ter- minated by the intervention of many. " Since, therefore, we have commanded many bishops to meet to- gether from different and remote places, in the city of Aries, towards the calends of August, I have also thought proper to write to thee, that taking a public vehicle from the most illustrious Latroniarius, corrector of Sicily, and taking with thee two others of the second rank, which thou mayest select, also three servants to afford you services on the way ; I would have you meet them within the same day at the aforesaid place. That by the weight of your authority, and the prudence and unanimity of the rest that assemble, this dispute, which has disgracefully continued until the present time, in consequence of certain disgraceful contentions, may be discussed, by hearing all that shall be alleged by those who are now at variance, whom we have also commanded to be present, and thus the controversy be reduced, though slowly, to that faith, and observance of religion, and fraternal concord, which ought to prevail. May Almighty God preserve thee in safety many years." u This council met according to appointment, August, A. D. 314, and was composed of the bishops from almost all the provinces of the Western division of the empire. Sylvester, who was now bishop of Rome, was summoned to the council, but declined on account of age, sending two presbyters and two deacons as his representatives This council also declared Caecilianus innocent of the crimes laid against him by the Donatists. The council also decided that who- ever should falsely accuse his brethren should be cut off from the communion of the church without hope of ever being received again, except at the point of death. It further decided that such bishops as had been ordained by the Donatists should officiate alternately with the Catholic bishops till one or the other should die. THE DONATISTS APPEAL TO THE EMPEROR. 289 But the council did not stop with the consideration of the question which it was summoned to consider. The bishops in council now took it upon themselves to legislate in matters of discipline for the world, and to bestow special preference and dignity upon the bishop of Rome. They " ordained that Easter should be kept on the same day, and on a Sunday, by all the churches in the world" (Bower}, and that the bishop of Rome should announce to the churches the particular Sunday upon which it should be celebrated. Before adjourning, the council sent to the bishop of Rome an account of their proceedings, with a copy of the decrees which they had adopted concerning the discipline of the churches, that he might publish them to all the churches. The Donatists appealed again, not for council, but to the emperor himself. Constantino held a consistory and heard their appeal, and in harmony with the council already held, pronounced in favor of Csecilianus and against the Donatists. Upon this the Donatists claimed that the emperor had been influenced by Hosius, one of his favorite bishops, and denied that he had any jurisdiction in the matter at all, because it was not right for civil magistrates to have anything to do with religion ! This claim was true enough, if they had made it at the beginning, and had refused from the first to allow their controversy to be touched upon in any way by the imperial authority. Then they would have stood upon proper ground ; but when they themselves were the first to appeal to the civil authority ; when they had asked the em- peror to consider the matter again and again, with the hope of getting the imperial power on their side ; and when they had carried to the last extreme, their efforts in this direction, when they had done all this in vain, and then turned about to protest, their protest was robbed of every shadow of force or merit. The question as to which was the Catholic Church having now been decided, Constantine, in his next epistle, could add w " History of the Popes," Sylvester, par. I, note A. 290 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. yet another distinguishing title. As we have seen, the Edict of Milan March, A. D. 313 ordered that the churches should be restored to the Christians "the whole body of Christians" without distinction. When the Catholic Church asserted its sole right to the designation " Chris- tian," and backed its assertion with political reasons which were then peculiarly cogent, the imperial epistle ran March, A. D. 313 "to the Catholic Church of the Christians." When the emperor wrote to Melchiades appointing the first council under the imperial authority, his epistle ran autumn, A. D. 313 the holy Catholic Church." When he wrote to Chrestus summer, A. D. 314 summoning him to the second council under imperial authority, he referred to the doctrine of the Catholic Church as embodying the "most holy religion." When it had been decided which was " the most holy Catholic religion," he addressed an epistle to Csecilianus A. D. 316 announcing imperial favors to " the legitimate and most holy Catholic religion," and empowered Csecilianus to assist the imperial officers in preventing any diversion from the most holy Catholic Church. The following is that letter : - " Constantine Augustus, to Csecilianus, bishop of Carthage : As we have determined, that in all the provinces of Africa, Numidia, and Mauritania, something should be granted to certain ministers of the legiti- mate and most holy Catholic religion to defray their expenses, I have given letters to Ursus, the most illustrious lieutenant-governor of Africa, and have communicated to him, that he shall provide, to pay to your au- thority, three thousand folles [about one hundred thousand dollars]. "After you shall have obtained this sum, you are to order these monies to be distributed among the aforesaid ministers, according to the abstract addressed to thee from Hosius. But if thou shalt learn, per- haps, that anything shall be wanting to complete this my purpose with regard to all, thou art authorized, without delay, to make demands for whatever thou mayest ascertain to be necessary, from Heraclides, the procurator of our possessions. And I have also commanded him when present, that if thy authority should demand any monies of him, he should see that it should be paid without delay. And as I ascertained that some men, who are of no settled mind, wished to divert the people THE STATE BECOMES PARTISAN. 291 from the most holy Catholic Church, by a certain pernicious adulteration, I wish thee to understand that I have given, both to the proconsul Anulinus and to Patricius, vicar-general of the prefects, when present, the following injunctions : that, among all the rest, they should particu- larly pay the necessary attention to this, nor should by any means toler- ate that this should be overlooked. Wherefore, if thou seest any of these men persevering in this madness, thou shalt, without any hesitancy, pro- ceed to the aforesaid judges, and report it to them, that they may ani- madvert upon them, as I commanded them, when present. May the power of the great God preserve thee many years." 13 When the Donatists rejected the decision of the emperor himself, and denied his right to say anything in the contro- versy in which they had invited him over and over again to participate, as announced in the above letter to Csecilianus he carried against them A. D. 316 the interference which they had solicited, to the full extent to which it would un- doubtedly have been carried against the Catholics if the Donatists had secured the decision in their favor. The Donatist bishops were driven out, and Constantine ordered all their churches to be delivered to the Catholic party. As this was done hi the interests, and by the direct counsel, of the Catholic party through Hosius, the emperor's chief coun- sellor, the imperial authority thus became wholly partisan, and to both parties was given a dignity which was far, far beyond any merit that was in the question at issue. To the Catholic party it gave the dignity of an imperial alliance and the assurance of imperial favor. The Donatist party it elevated to a dignity and clothed with an importance which placed it before the world as worthy of imperial antagonism. Into the Catholic party, it infused more than ever the pride of place, power, and imperial favor. To the Donatist party it gave the dignity and fame of a persecuted people, and in- creased the evil which it attempted to destroy. More than this, when the governmental authority, which should be for the protection of all alike from violence, be- came itself a party to the controversy, it forsook the place of impartial protector, and assumed the place of a partisan. 13 Eusebius's " Ecclesiastical History," book x, chap, vj. 292 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. This only deepened the sense of injury felt by the defeated, and the sense of triumph felt by the victorious, party ; and the antagonism was only the more embittered. " The im- placable faction darkened into a sanguinary feud. For the first time, human blood was shed in conflicts between fol- lowers of the Prince of peace." - Milman. u And the gov- ernment, by becoming a partisan, had lost the power to keep the peace. By becoming a party to religious controversy, it had lost the power to prevent civil violence between religious factions. " Each party recriminated on the other, but neither denies the barbarous scenes of massacre and license which devastated the African cities. The Donatists boasted of their martyrs, and the cruelties of the Catholic party rest on their own admission : they deny not, they proudly vindi- cate, their barbarities : ' Is the vengeance of God to be de- frauded of its victims ? ' and they appeal to the Old Testament to justify, by the examples of Moses, of Phineas, and of Elijah, the Christian duty of slaying by thousands the renegades and unbelievers." Milman. 15 This, though a shameful perversion of Scripture, was but the practical work- ing out of the theocratical theory of government, which was the basis of the whole system of the union of Church and State which had been created by Constantine and the bishops. Constantino issued an edict commanding peace, but it was all in vain. The tumult went on, constantly increasing in violence, until the only alternative was for the imperial authority either to enter upon the horrors of a protracted war with its own subjects, or openly refuse to go any farther. The latter step was taken. In A. D. 321, upon the advice of the civil officers of Africa, Constantine "repealed the laws against the Donatists, and gave the African people full liberty to follow either of the contending parties, as they liked best. " Mosheim. 16 u " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 5 from the end. 15 Id. 16 "Ecclesiastical History" Century iv, book ii, part ii, chap, v, par. 5, Mur- dpck's translation. CLERGY EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC OFFICES. 293 The Donatist controversy touched no point of doctrine, but of discipline only, and was confined to the provinces of Africa. The result in this case, however, ought to have convinced Constantine that the best thing for the imperial authority to do was to return, and strictly adhere, to the principles of the Edict of Milan, to let religious questions and controversies entirely alone, and allow each indi- vidual "the privilege of choosing and professing his own religion." Yet, even if this thought had occurred to him, it would have been impossible for him to do so and attain the object of his ambition. The principles of the Edict of Milan had no place in the compact entered into between Constantine and the bishops. As yet he possessed only half the empire ; for Licinius still held the East, and Constan- tine's position was not yet so secure that he dare risk any break with the bishops. He had bargained to them his influ- ence in religious things for theirs in politics. The contract had been entered into, fie had s'old himself to the church influence, and he could not go back even if he would. The empire was before him, but without the support of the church party it could not be his. It is necessary now to notice the material point in that edict issued in A. D. 313, exempting from all public offices the clergy of the Catholic Church. As a benefit to society and that ' ' the greatest good might be conferred on the State, " the clergy of the Catholic Church were to "be held totally free and exempt from all public offices." At this time the burdens and expenses of the principal offices of the State were so great that this exemption was of the greatest material benefit. The immediate effect of the edict, therefore, was to erect the clerical order into a distinct and privileged class. For instance, in the days of the sys- tematic governing of the empire, the decurionate was the chief office of the State. " The decurions formed the Sen- ates of the towns ; they supplied the magistrates from their body, arid had the right of electing them. Under the new 294 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. financial system introduced by Diocletian, the decurions were made responsible for the full amount of taxation im- posed by the cataster, or assessment on the town and dis- trict. " Milman. " As the splendor and magnificence of the court display was increased, and as the imperial power became more absolute, the taxation became more and more burdensome. To such an extent indeed was this carried that tenants, and indeed proprietors of moderate means, were well-nigh bankrupted. Yet the imperial power demanded of the decu- rions the full amount of the taxes that were levied in their town or district. "The office itself grew into disrepute, and the law was obliged to force that upon the reluctant citizen of wealth or character which had before been an object of eager emulation and competition." Milman. 1 * The exemption of the clerical order from all public of- fices opened the way for all who wpuld escape these burdens, to become, by whatever means possible, members of .that order. The effect was, therefore, to bring into the ministry of the church a crowd of men who had no other purpose in view than to be relieved from the burdensome duties that were laid upon the public by the imperial extravagance of Constantine. So promptly did this consequence follow from this edict, and " such numbers of persons, in order to secure this exemption, rushed into the clerical order," that "this manifest abuse demanded an immediate modification of the law." It was therefore ordered that " none were to be ad- mitted into the sacred order except on the vacancy of a relig- ious charge, and then those only whose poverty exempted them from the municipal functions" Milman. 19 Nor was this all. The order of the clergy itself found that it was required to pay for this exemption a tribute which it had not at all contemplated in the original bargain. Those already belonging to the clerical order who were sufficiently 17 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, ii, par. 2, 3. 18 Id., par. 3. Id, FRUITS OF THE EXEMPTION. 295 wealthy to exercise the office of decurion, were commanded to ' ' abandon their religious profession " (Milman 20 ), in order that they might fill the office which had been deserted by the exemption which had been granted to their particular order. This of course was counted by the clergy as a great hardship. But as they had willingly consented at the first to the inter- ference of the authority of the State when it was exercised seemingly to their profit, they had thereby forfeited their right to protest against that same interference when it was exercised actually to the denial of their natural rights. Yet the resources of dishonest intrigue were still left to them, especially the plea that their possessions belonged not to themselves but to the church, and it was exercised to such an extent as virtually to defeat the purpose of this later law. Thus the evil consequences of the original law still flowed on, and "numbers, without any inward call to the spiritual office, and without any fitness for it whatever, now got them- selves ordained as ecclesiastics, for the sake of enjoying this exemption, whereby many of the worst class came to the ad- ministration of the most sacred calling." JVeander. 21 Another scheme adopted by Constantino, was fraught with more evil in the same direction. As he had favored the new religion only on account of its value to him as a political factor, he counted it to his advantage to have as many as possible to profess that religion. He therefore used all the means that could be employed by the State to effect this purpose. He made the principal positions about his palace and court, a gift and reward to the professors of the new imperial religion, and with " the hopes of wealth and honors, the example of an emperor, his exhortations, his irresistible smiles, diffused conviction among the venal and obsequious crowds which usually fill the apartments of a palace. . . . As the lower ranks of society are governed by imitation, the conversion of 20 Id. 21 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Second, part i, div. i, par. 11. 25 296 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. those who possessed any eminence of birth, of power, or of riches, was soon followed by dependent multitudes. The salvation of the common people was purchased at an easy rate, if it be true that, in one year, twelve thousand men were baptized at Rome, besides a proportionable number of women and children, and that a white garment, with twenty pieces of gold, had been promised by the emperor to every convert." - Gibbon. It will be observed that in this statement Gibbon inserts the cautious clause, "if it be true," but such a precaution was scarcely necessary ; because the whole history of the times bears witness that such was the system followed, whether this particular instance was a fact or not. This is proved by the next instance which we shall mention of Con- stantine's efforts in gaining converts to the new religion. He wrote letters offering rewards both political and financial to those cities which, as such, would forsake the heathen religion, and destroy or allow to be destroyed their heathen temples. "The cities which signalized a forward zeal, by the voluntary destruction of their temples, were distinguished by municipal privileges, and rewarded with popular dona- tives."- - Gibbon. In cities that would accept this offer, he would build churches at the public expense, and send there "a complete body of the clergy arid a bishop" when "there were as yet no Christians in the place." Also upon such churches he bestowed "large sums for the support of the poor; so that the conversion of the heathen might be promoted by doing good to their bodies." Neander. zi And that this was simply the manifestation of his constant policy, is shown by the fact that at the Council of Nice, in giving instruction to the bishops as to how they should conduct themselves, he said : 22 "Decline and Fall," chap, xx, par. 18. 23 Id. 24 "History of the Christian Keligion and Church," Vol. ii, Section First, part j, A, par. 38. THE CHURCU OF THE MASSES. 297 " In all ways unbelievers must be saved. It is not every one who will be converted by learning and reasoning. Some join us from desire of maintenance ; some for preferment ; some for presents : nothing is so rare as a real lover of truth, We must be like physicians, and accommo" date our medicines to the diseases, our teaching to the different minds of all." 25 He further enacted "that money should be given in every city to orphans and widows, and to those who were conse- crated to the divine service ; and he fixed the amount of their annual allowance [of provisions] more according to the impulse of his own generosity, than to the exigencies of their condition."- - Theodoret. In view of these things it is evident that there is nothing at all extravagant in the state- ment that in a single year twelve thousand men, besides women and children, were baptized in Rome. In addition to all this, he exempted all church property from taxation, which exemption, in the course of time, the church asserted as of divine right ; and the example there set is followed to this day, even among people who profess a separation of Church and State. The only result which could possibly come from such proceedings as these, was, First, the great mass of the people, of the pagans, in the empire, with no change either of character or convictions, were drawn into the Catholic Church. Thus the State and the Church became one and the same thing ; and that one thing was simply the embodiment of the second result ; namely, a solid mass of hypocrisy. "The vast numbers who, from external considerations, without any inward call, joined themselves to the Christian communities, served to introduce into the church all the corruptions of the heathen world. Pagan vices, pagan delusions, pagan superstition, took the garb and name of Christianity, and were thus enabled to exert a more corrupt- ing influence on the Christian life. Such were those who, 25 Stanley, " History of the Eastern Church," Lecture v, par. 13 from the end. ^"Ecclesiastical History," hook 1, chap. xi. 298 THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. without any real interest whatever in the concerns of re-. ligion, living half in paganism and half in an outward show of Christianity, composed the crowds that thronged the churches on the festivals of the Christians, and the theaters on the festivals of the pagans. Such were those who accounted themselves Christians, if they but attended church once or twice in a year ; while, without a thought of any higher life, they abandoned themselves to every species of worldly pursuit and pleasure." Neander* 1 It could not be otherwise. The course pursued by Con- stantine in conformity with the political intrigues of the bishops, drew into the Catholic Church every hypocrite in the Roman empire. And this for the simple reason that it could draw no other kind ; because no man of principle, even though he were an outright pagan, would allow himself to be won by any such means. It was only to spread throughout all the empire the ambiguous mixture of paganism and apostate Christianity which we have seen so thoroughly ex- emplified in the life of Constantine himself, who was further inspired and flattered by the ambitious bishops. There were some honest pagans who refused all the im- perial bribes and kept aloof from the wicked system thereby established. There were some genuine Christians who not only kept aloof from the foul mass, but protested against every step that was taken in creating it. But speaking generally, the whole population of the empire was in- cluded in the system thus established. "By taking in the whole population of the Roman empire, the church became, indeed, a church of the masses, a church of the people, but at the same time more or less a church of the world. Christianity became a matter of fashion. The number of hypocrites and formal professors rapidly in- creased ; strict discipline, zeal, self-sacrifice, and brotherly love proportionally ebbed away ; and many heathen customs ""History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Third, part i, div. i, par. 1. THE CHURCH A MASS OF HYPOCRITES. 299 and usages, under altered names, crept into the worship of God and the life of the Christian people. The Roman State had grown up under the influence of idolatry, and was not to be magically transformed at a stroke. With the secularizing process, therefore, a paganizing tendency went hand in hand." Schaff. The effect of all this was further detrimental to true Christianity in that it argued that Christianity consists in the mere profession of the name, pertaining not to the essential character, nor implying any material change in the general conduct. Consequently, those who had been by this means brought into the church acted worse, and really were worse, than those who remained aloof. When the bishops or clergy of the church undertook to exhort the heathen to become Christians, the pagans pointed to the hyp- ocritical professors who were already members of the church, and replied to the invitation with such arguments as these : " 'We lead good lives already : what need have we of Christ ? We commit no murder, theft, nor robbery ; we covet no man's possessions ; we are guilty of no breach of the matrimonial bond. Let something worthy of censure be found in our lives, and whoever can point it out may make us Christians.' Comparing himself with nominal Christians : ' Why would you persuade me to become a Christian ? I have been defrauded by a Christian, I never defrauded any man ; a Christian has broken his oath to me, and I never broke my word to any man.' ' Neander. Not only was the church thus rendered powerless to in- fluence those who were without, but she was likewise power- less to influence for any good those who were within. When the vast majority in the church were unconverted and had joined the church from worldly and selfish motives, liv- ing only lives of conscious hypocrisy, it was impossible 28 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, g 22, par. 2. 29 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section First, part i, div. C, par. 1. THE UNION OF CHURCH AND STATE. that church discipline should be enforced by church au- thority. The next step taken by the bishopric, therefore, was to secure edicts under which they could enforce church disci- pline. This, too, not only upon the members of the church, but likewise upon those who were not. The church having, out of lust for worldly power and influence, forsaken the power of God, the civil power was the only resource that remained to her. Conscious of her loss of moral power, she seized upon the civil. The account of this further wicked- ness will be given in the next chapter. CHAPTER XIII. THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. THE church was fully conscious of her loss of the power of God before she sought the power of the State. Had she not been, she never would have made any overtures to the imperial authority, nor have received with favor any from it. There is a power that belongs with the gospel of Christ, and is inseparable from the truth of the gospel, that is the power of God. In fact, the gospel is but the manifestation of that power, for the gospel "is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth." Rom. i, 16. As long, therefore, as any order or organization of people pro- fessing the gospel of Christ maintains the principle of that gospel in sincerity, so long the power of God will be with them, and they will have no need of any other power to make their influence felt for good wherever known. But just as soon as any person or association professing the gospel loses the spirit of it, so soon the power is gone also. Then, and only then, docs such an organization seek for another kind of power to supply the place of that which is lost. Thus -was it with the church at this time. She had fallen, deplorably fallen, from the purity and the truth, and therefore from the power, of the gospel. And having lost the power of God and of godliness, she greedily grasped for the power of the State and of ungodliness. And to secure laws by which she might enforce her discipline and dogmas upon those whom she had lost the power either to convince [301] 302 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. or to persuade, \vas the definite purpose which the bishopric had in view when it struck tlmt bargain with Constantine, and lent him the influence of the church in his imperial aspirations. In the chapter on "Constantine and the Bishops," evi- dence has been given which shows how diligently the bishops endeavored to convince themselves that in the theocracy which they had framed and of which they were now a part, the kingdom of God was come. But they did not suppose for a moment that the Lord himself would come and conduct the affairs of this kingdom in person. They themselves were to be the representatives of God upon the earth, and the the- ocracy thus established was to be ruled by the Lord through them. This was but the culmination of the evil spirit mani- fested in the self-exaltation of the bishopric. That is to say, their idea of a theocracy was utterly false, and the working out of the theory was but the manifestation of the mystery of iniquity. Yet this is not to say that all ideas of a theocracy have always been false. The government of Israel was a true theocracy. That was really a government of God. At the burning bush, God commissioned Moses to lead his people out of Egypt. By signs and wonders and mighty miracles multiplied, God delivered Israel from Egypt, led .them through the Red Sea, and through the wilderness, and finally into the promised land. There he ruled them by judges, to whom "in divers manners" he revealed his will, " until Samuel the prophet." In the days of Samuel, the people asked that they might have a king. Their request was granted, but only under the following earnest protest : "And the Lord said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee : for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt even unto this day, wherewith ISRAEL REJECTS THE LORD AS KINO. 303 they have forsaken me, and served other gods, so do they also unto thee. Now therefore hearken unto their voice : howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them, and show them the manner of the king that shall reign over them. "And Samuel told all the words of the Lord unto the people that asked of him a king. And he said, This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you : He will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his char- iots, and to be his horsemen ; and some shall run before his chariots, and he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties ; and will set them to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instru- ments of war, and instruments of his chariots. And he will take your daughters to be confectionaries, and to be cooks, and to be bakers. And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your oliveyards, even the best f them, and give them to his servants. And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants. And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put them to his work. He will take the tenth of your sheep : and ye shall be his servants. And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you ; and the Lord will not hear you in that day. "Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel ; and they said, Nay ; but we will have a king over us ; that we also may be like all the nations ; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our bat- tles. And Samuel heard all the words of the people, and he rehearsed them in the ears of the Lord. And the Lord said to Samuel, Hearken unto their voice, and make them a king. And Samuel said unto the men of Israel, Go ye every man unto his city. " God chose Saul, and Samuel anointed him king over Israel. "And Samuel said unto all Israel, Behold, I have 304 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. hearkened unto your voice in all that ye said unto me, and have made a king over you. And now, behold, the king walketh before you : and I am old and gray-headed ; and, behold, my sons are with you : and I have walked before you from my childhood unto this day. Behold, here I am : witness against me before the Lord, and before his anointed : whose ox have I taken ? or whose ass have I taken ? or whom have I defrauded ? whom have I op- pressed? or of whose hand have I received any bribe to blind mine eyes therewith? and I will restore it to you. And they said, Thou hast not defrauded us, nor oppressed us, neither hast thou taken ought of any man's hand. And he said unto them, The Lord is witness against you, and his anointed is witness this day, that ye have not found ought in my hand. And they answered, He is witness. "And Samuel said unto the people, It is the Lord that advanced Moses and Aaron, and that brought your fathers up out of the land of Egypt. Now therefore stand still, that I may reason with you before the Lord of all the right- eous acts of the Lord, which he did to you and to your fathers. When Jacob was come into Egypt, and your fathers cried unto the Lord, then the Lord sent Moses and Aaron, which brought forth your fathers out of Egypt, and made them dwell in this place. And when they forgot the Lord their God, he sold them into the hands of Sisera, cap- tain of the host of Razor, and into the hand of the Philis- tines, and into the hand of the king of Moab, and they fought against them. And they cried unto the Lord, and said, We have sinned, because we have forsaken the Lord, and have served Baalim and Ashtaroth : but now deliver us out of the hand of our enemies, and we will serve thee. And the Lord sent Jerubbaal, and Bedan, and Jephthah, and Samuel, and delivered you out of the hand of your enemies on every side, and ye dwelt safe. And when ye saw that Nahash the king of the children of Ammon came against you, ye said unto me, Nay ; but a king shall reign THE LORD WOULD NOT FORSAKE THE PEOPLE. 305 over us : when the Lord your God was your king. Now therefore, behold the king whom ye have chosen, and whom ye have desired ; and, behold, the Lord hath set a king over you. If ye will fear the Lord, and serve him, and obey his voice, and not rebel against the commandment of the Lord ; then shall both ye and also the king that reigneth over you continue following the Lord your God : but if ye will not obey the voice of the Lord, but rebel against the command- ment of the Lord, then shall the hand of the Lord be against you, as it was against your fathers. "Now therefore stand and see this great thing, which the Lord will do before your eyes. Is it not wheat harvest to-day ? I will call unto the Lord, and he shall send thunder and rain ; that ye may perceive and see that your wicked- ness is great, which ye have done in the sight of the Lord, in asking you a king. So Samuel called unto the Lord ; and the Lord sent thunder and rain that day : and all the people greatly feared the Lord and Samuel. And all the peo- ple said unto Samuel, Pray for thy servants unto the Lord thy God, that we die not : for we have added unto all our sins this evil, to ask us a king. "And Samuel said unto the people, Fear not : ye have done all this wickedness : yet turn not aside from following the Lord, but serve the Lord with all your heart ; and turn ye not aside ; for then should ye go after vain things, which cannot profit nor deliver ; for they are vain. For- the Lord will not forsake his people for his great name's sake : be- cause it hath pleased the Lord to make you his people. Moreover as for me, God forbid that I should sin against the Lord in ceasing to pray for you : but I will teach you the good and the right way : only fear the Lord, and serve him in truth with all your heart : for consider how great things he hath done for you. But if ye shall still do wick- edly, ye shall be consumed, both ye and your king." 1 Sam., chaps, viii, xii. Although the people were allowed to have a king, and 306 ME ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. although in this movement they had virtually rejected the Lord, as Samuel told them, the Lord would not forsake them. He still continued to guide the nation, communicat- ing his will by prophets ; and although they had done wrong in demanding a king, the Lord made even the kingship to be an additional element in teaching them his eternal purpose ; he made it to them a reminder of the eternal kingdom which he would establish in the accomplishment of his purpose concerning the earth. Saul failed to do the will of God, and as he rejected the word of the Lord, the Lord rejected him from being king, and sent Samuel to anoint David king over Israel ; and David's house, and David's throne, God established for evermore. When Solomon succeeded to the kingdom in the place of David his father, the record is : "Then Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord as king instead of David his father." 1 Chron. xxix, 23. David's throne was the throne of the Lord, and Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord as king over -the earthly kingdom of God. The succession to the throne descended in David's line to Zedekiah, who was made subject to the king of Babylon, that perchance the kingship with the kingdom might stand. Zedekiah entered into a solemn covenant before God that he would remain a faithful subject of the king of Babylon. His name was Mattaniah at first, and when he entered into this covenant, the king of Babylon changed his name to Zedekiah, which means The Justice of Jehovah. Mattaniah gave his hand, and accepted this new name as the seal of the covenant with the king of Babylon, and in so doing pledged that if he should break that covenant, he would incur the judgment of the Lord. Zedekiah did break this covenant, upon which the Lord said : " As I live, saith the Lord God, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he brake, even with THE KINGDOM NOT OF THIS WORLD. 307 him in the midst of Babylon he shall die. . . . Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. Therefore thus saith the Lord God ; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head." Eze. xvii, 16-19. And in recompensing this evil upon the head of Zedekiah, the word of Samuel to the people was fulfilled when he told them, "If ye shall still do wick- edly, ye shall be consumed, both ye and your king." For to Zedekiah, and to the kingdom forever after, God gave this testimony : "Thou profane, wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come, when iniquity shall have an end, thus saith the Lord God : Remove the diadem, and take off the crown ; this shall not be the same ; exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn it ; mid it shall l>e no more, until he come whose right it is j and I will give it him" Eze. xxi, 25-27. The kingdom was then subject to Babylon. When Babylon fell, and Medo-Persia succeeded, it was overturned the first time. When Medo-Persia fell, and was succeeded by Grecia, it was overturned the second time. When the Greek empire gave way to Home, it was overturned the third time. And then says the word, "It shall be no more, until he come whose right it is ; and I will give it him." And he whose right it is, is thus named : "Thou . . . shalt call his name Jesus. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest ; and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David ; and he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever ; and of his kingdom there shall be no end." Luke i, 31-33. But that kingdom is not of this world, nor will he sit upon that throne in this world. While Christ was here as " that prophet," a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief, he refused to exercise any earthly authority or office what- ever. When appealed to, to mediate in a dispute between 308 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. two brothers in regard to their inheritance, he replied, "Man, who made me a judge or a divider over you?" Luke xii, 14. And when the people would have taken him and made him a king, he withdrew himself from them, and went to the mountain alone. John vi, 15. The last night he spent on earth before his crucifixion, and in the last talk with Pilate before he went to the cross, he said, "My kingdom is not of this world." John xviii, 36. Thus the throne of the Lord has been removed from this world, and will be no more in this world nor of this world, until, as King of kings and Lord of lords, he whose right it is shall come again. And that time is the end of this world and the beginning of the world to come. This is shown by many scriptures, some of which it will be in order here to quote. To the twelve disciples the Saviour said: "I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me ; that ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Luke xxii, 29, 30. As to when this shall be, we are informed by the word in Matthew thus : "In the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Matt, xix, 23. And the time when he shall sit upon the throne of his glory, is stated by another passage in Matthew thus : "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory : and before him shall be gathered all nations." Chap, xxv, 31, 32. By these scriptures and all others on the subject, it is evident that the kingdom of Christ, the kingdom of God, is not only not of this world, but is never- more to be of this world. Therefore while this world stands, a theocracy can never be in it again. From the death of Christ until now, every theory of an earthly theocracy has been a false theory. And from now until the end of the world, every such theory will be a false theory. Yet such THE NEW AND FALSE THEOCRACY. 3Q9 was the theory of the bishops of the fourth century ; and being such, it was utterly false and wicked. The falsity of this theory of the bishops of the fourth century has been clearly seen by but one of the church his- torians, that is, Neander. And this, as well as the scheme which the bishops had in mind, has been better described by him than by all the others put together. The design of the bishops with respect to the civil power is seen in the following statement : "There had in fact arisen in the church ... a false theocratical theory, originating not in the essence of the gospel, but in the confusion of the religious constitutions of the Old and New Testaments, which . . . brought along with it an unchristian opposition of the spiritual to the secular power, and which might easily result in the formation of a sacerdotal State, subordinating the secular to itself in a false and outward way." Neander. 1 That which they had in mind when they joined their interests to Constantino's, was to use the power which through him they would thus secure, to carry into effect in the State and by governmental authority their theocratical project. The State was not only to be subordinate to the church, but was to be the servant of the church to assist in bringing all the world into the new kingdom of God. The bishops were the channel through which the will of God was to be made known to the State. Therefore the views of the bishops were to be to the government the expression of the will of God, and whatever laws the bishopric might deem necessary to make the principles of their theocracy effective, it was their purpose to secure. This also has been well stated by the same excellent authority just quoted, as follows : " This theocratical theory was already the prevailing one in the time of Constantine ; and . . . the bishops voluntarily made themselves de- 1 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol ii, Section Second, part i, div. i, par. 2. 310 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. pendent on him by their disputes, and by their determination to make use of the power of the State for the furtherance of their aims." Neander* As we have found in the evidence of the previous chap- ter, the church had become filled with a mass of people who had no respect for religious exercises, and now it became necessary to use tne power of the State to assist in preserv- ing respect for church discipline. As the church-members had not religion enough to lead them to do what they pro- fessed was their duty to do, the services of the State had to be enlisted to assist them in doing what they ' professed to believe it was right to do. In other words, as only worldly and selfish interests had been appealed to in bring- ing them to membership in the church, and as they therefore had no conscience in the matter, the services of the State were employed as aids to conscience, or rather to supply the lack of conscience. Accordingly, one of the first, if not the very first, of the laws secured by the bishops in behalf of the church, was enacted, as it is supposed, about A. D. 314, ordering that on Friday and on Sunday ''there should be a suspension of business at the courts and in other civil offices, so that the day might be devoted with less interruption to the purposes of devotion." JVeander. 3 To justify this, the specious plea was presented that when the courts and public offices were open and regularly conducted by the State on these church days, the members were hindered from attending to their religious exercises. It was further argued that if the State kept its offices open, and conducted the public business on those days, as the church-members could not conduct the public business and attend to church services both, they could not well hold public offices ; and that, therefore, the State was in fact discriminating against the church, and was 2 "History of the Christian Religion," Vol. ii, Section Second, part i, div. i, par. 3. 3 /tf., Section Third, part ii, div. iii, par. 3. CONSTANTINE'S SUNDAY-LAW. 3H hindering rather than helping the progress of the kingdom of God. This was simply to confess that their Christianity was altogether earthly, sensual, and selfish. It was to confess that there was not enough virtue in their profession of re- ligion to pay them for professing it ; and they must needs have the State pay them for professing it. This was in fact in harmony with the whole system of which they were a part. They had been paid by the State in the first place to become professors of the new religion, and it was but con- sistent for them to ask the State to continue to pay them for the continued profession of it. This was consistent with the system there established ; but it was totally inconsistent with every idea of true religion. Any religion that is not of sufficient value in itself to pay men for professing it, is not worth professing, much less is it worth supporting by the State. In genuine Christianity there is a virtue and a value which make it of more worth to him who professes it, than all that the whole world can afford yea, of more worth than life itself. This, however, was but the beginning. The State had become an instrument in the hands of the church, and she was determined to use it for all it was worth. As we have seen by many proofs, one of the first aims of the apostate church was the exaltation of Sunday as the chief sacred day. And no sooner had the Catholic Church made herself sure of the recognition and support of the State, than she secured from the emperor an edict setting apart Sunday especially to the purposes of devotion. As the sun was the chief deity of the pagans, and as the forms of sun worship had been so fully adopted by the apostate church, it was an easy task to secure from the sun-loving and church-courting Constantine, a law establishing the observance of the day of the sun as a holy day. Accordingly, March 7, A. D. 321, Con- stantine issued his famous Sunday edict, which reads as follows : 26 312 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. Constantine, Emperor Augustus, to Helpidius : On the venerable day of the sun let the magistrates and people residing in cities rest, and let all workshops be closed. In the country, however, persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits ; because it often happens that another day is not so suitable for grain-sowing or for vine-planting ; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such opera- tions, the bounty of heaven should be lost. (Given the 7th day of March, Crispus and Constantine being consuls each of them for the second time. ) " * Schaff attempts to give the Sunday legislation of Con- stantine a "civil" character ; but this is not only an error as to fact, but an anachronism by fifteen hundred and fifty years. There was no such idea in the conception of gov- ernment entertained by Constantine and the bishops ; nor was there any place for any such idea in this piece of legis- lation. The whole thing was religious. This is seen in at least five distinct counts. First Count. As we have abundantly shown, the theory of government intended by the bishops and sanctioned by Constantine, was a theocracy ; that is, a government of God, which, in itself, could be nothing else than religious. We have shown that the bishops, in behalf of the church, played the part of oppressed Israel, while Maxentius was made to occupy the place of a second Pharaoh, and Constantine that of a new Moses delivering Israel. We have seen that the new Pharaoh the horse and his rider was thrown into the, sea, and sunk to the bottom like a stone. We have heard the song of deliverance of the new Israel when the new Moses had crossed the Red Sea the River Tiber. We have seen that the new Moses, going on to the conquest of the heathen in the wilderness, set up the tabernacle and pitched it far off 4 Schaff's translation, " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, g 75, par. 5, note 1. The following is the Latin, from the same place : " Imperator Con- stantinus Aug. Helpidio : Omnes judices, urbanseque plebes et cunctarum artium officia venerabili die Soils quiescant. Ruri tamen positi agrorum culturae libere licenterque inserviant, quoniam frequenter evenit, ut non aptius alio die f rumenta sulcis aut vineae ecrobibus mandentur, ne occasione moment! pereat commoditas eoelesti provisione concessa," SUNDAY LEGISLATION 18 RELIGIOUS ONLY. 313 from the camp, where he received " divine" direction as to how he should conduct "the battles of the Lord." Thus far in the establishment of the new theocracy, each step in the course of the original theocracy had been imitated. Now this establishment of Sunday observance by law, was simply another step taken by the creators of the new theocracy in imitation of the original. After the original Israel had crossed the Red Sea, and had gone a consider- able journey in the wilderness, God established among them, by a law, too, the observance of the Sabbath, a day of weekly rest. This setting apart of Sunday in the new theocracy, and its observance being established and enforced by law, was in imitation of the act of God in tlie original theocracy in establishing the observance of the Sabbath. This view is confirmed by the testimony of the same bishop, who has already given us so extensive a view of the work- ings of the new theocracy. And these are the words : "All things whatsoever that it was^duty to do on the Sabbath, these we have transferred to the Lord's day." Now the Sabbath is wholly religious. The government in which its observance was enforced was the government of God. The law by which its observance was enforced was the law of God. .The observance of the Sabbath was in recognition of Jehovah as the true God, and was a part of the worship of him as such. Now when it is declared by one of the chiefest factors in the new theocracy, that, all things whatsoever that it was duty to do on the Sabbath, these we have transferred to the Sunday, this in the connection in which it stands, is the strongest possible proof that the observance of the day and the object of the law were wholly religious, without a single civil element anywhere even con- templated. This is confirmed by the Second Count. In accordance with their idea of a the- 5 "Commentary on the Psalms," xcii, quoted in Cox's "Sabbath Literature," Vol. i, p. 361, and in the "Sabbath Manual," by Justin Edwards, pp. 125-127. 314 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. ocracj, the governmental system which was now established composed the kingdom of God. We have seen how this idea was entertained by the bishops at the banquet which Constantine gave to them at the close of the Council of Nice. We have seen it further adopted when Constantine's mother sent to him the nails of the "true cross," of which he made a bridle bit, when the bishops declared that the prophecy was fulfilled which says, "In that day [the day of the kingdom of God upon earth] shall there be upon the bridles of the horses, holiness unto the Lord." This idea, however, stands out in its fullness, in an oration which Eusebius delivered in praise of Constantine, and in his presence, on the thirtieth anniversary of the emperor's reign. The flattering bishop announced that God gave to Constantine greater proofs of his beneficence in proportion to the emperor's holy services to him, and accordingly had permitted him to celebrate already three decades, and now was entered upon the fourth. He related how the emperor at the end of each decen- nial period, had advanced one of his sons to a share of the imperial power ; and now in the absence of other sons, he would extend the like favor to other of his kindred. Thus he said : "The eldest, who bears his father's name, ne received as his partner in the empire about the close of the first decade of his reign : the second, next in point of age, at the second ; and the third in like manner at the third decennial period, the occasion of this our present festival. And now that the fourth period has commenced, and the time of his reign is still further prolonged, he desires to extend his imperial authority by calling still more of his kindred to partake his power ; and, by the appointment of the Ca?sars, fulfills the predictions of the holy propliets, according to what they uttered ages before : ' And the saints of the Most High shall take the kingdom,'" Eusebius. 6 Then as we have seen by so many proofs that the sun was the chief deity in this new kingdom of God, the bishop proceeds to draw for the edification of the Apollo-loving umperor, the following picture of him as the sun in his 6 " Oration in Praise of Constantine," chap. iii. THE EMPIRE A "KINGDOM OF GOD." 315 chariot traversing the world ; and positively defines the system of government as a monarchy of God patterned after the divine original : "He it is who appoints him this present festival, in that he has made him victorious over every enemy that disturbed his peace: he it is who displays him as an example of true godliness to the human race. And thus our emperor, like the radiant sun, illuminates the most distant subjects of his empire through the presence of the CaBsars, as with the far piercing rays of his own brightness. To us who occupy the Eastern regions he has given a son worthy of himself ; a second and a third re- spectively to other departments of his empire, to be, as it were, brilliant reflectors of the light which proceeds from himself. Once more, having harnessed, as it were, under the selfsame yoke the four most noble Caesars as horses in the imperial chariot, he sits on high and directs their course by the reins of holy harmony and concord ; and himself every- where present, and observant of every event, thus traverses every region of the world. Lastly, invested as he is with a semblance of heavenly sovereignty, he directs his gaze above, and frames his earthly government according to the pattern of that divine original, feeling strength in its con- formity to the monarchy of God." 7 This is evidence enough to show that the system of gov- ernment established by Constantino and the bishops was considered as in very fact, the kingdom of God. The laws therefore being laws of the kingdom of God, would neces- sarily have a religious character ; and that such was held to be the case, is made plain by the following passage : "Our emperor, ever beloved by Him, who derives the source of impe- rial authority from above, and is strong in the power of his sacred title, has controlled the empire of the world for a long period of years. Again: that Preserver of the universe orders these heavens and earth, and the celestial kingdom, consistently with his Father's will. Even so our emperor whom he loves, by bringing those whom he rules on earth to the only begotten Word and Saviour, renders them fit subjects of his kingdom."* 7 Id. The reader may more fully understand this by reference to the illus- tration, opposite page 507 of this book. There at the upper left-hand corner of the picture can be seen the sun in his chariot driving four horses. It is evident that in this picture which the bishop has drawn of the emperor, he was playing upon the sun-worshiping sentiments of the " bishop of externals." 8 Id., chap. ii. 316 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. As the object of the emperor was to render the people fit subjects for this kingdom of God, the Sunday law was plainly in the interests of the new kingdom of God, and was therefore religious only. This is yet further proved by the Tfiird Count. The purpose of the first Sunday law, was ' ' that the day might be devoted with less interruption to the purposes of devotion." This is Neander's translation of the statement of Sozomen respecting the first law closing public offices on Friday and Sunday. 9 Prof. Walford's translation of the passage is as follows : " He also enjoined the observance of the day termed the Lord's day, which the Jews call the first day of the week, and which the Greeks dedicate to the sun, as likewise the day before the seventh, and com- manded that no judicial or other business should be transacted on those days, but that God should be served with prayers and supplications." Sozomen. 10 Such, therefore, was the character and intent of the first enactment respecting Sunday. And of the second Sunday law we have a statement equally clear, that such was its pur- pose also. In praise of Constantine, the episcopal "orator" says : "He commanded, too, that one day should be regarded as a special occasion for religious worship." Eusebius. 11 And in naming the great things which Christ had been enabled to accomplish by the help of Constantine, he shuts out every element upon which a civil claim might be based, by continuing in the following words : "Who else has commanded the nations inhabiting the continents and islands of this mighty globe to assemble weekly on the Lord's day, and to observe it as a festival, not indeed for the pampering of the body, BUT for the comfort and invigoration of the soul by instruction in divine truth f " I2 9 " History of the Christian Religion and Church,"' Vol. ii, Section Third, part ii, div. iii, par. 2. 10 " Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap. viii. 11 " Oration in Praise of Constantine," chap. Ix. 12 /d., chap. xvii. BY AUTHORITY OF PONTIFEX MAXIMTTS. 317 As the purpose of the Sunday law was to set apart the day for the purposes of devotion, for the comfort and invig- oration of the soul by instruction in divine truth, and for religious worship, it follows inevitably that the legislation was wholly religious. This is yet further supported by the- Fourth Count. The title which is given to the day by Constantine in the edict, is distinctively religious. It is venerabili die solis venerable day of the sun. This was the pagan religious title of the day, and to every heathen was suggestive of the religious character which attached to the day as the one especially devoted to the sun and its worship. An additional act of the emperor himself in this connection, has left no room for reasonable doubt that the intent of the law was religious only. As the interpreter of his own law, and clearly indicating its intent, he drew up the following prayer, which he had the soldiers repeat in concert at a given signal every Sunday morning : "We acknowledge thee the only God: we own thee as our King, and implore thy succor. By thy favor have we gotten the victory: through thee are we mightier than our enemies. We render thanks for thy past benefits, and trust thee for future blessings. Together we pray to thee, and beseech thee long to preserve to us, safe and triumphant, our em- peror Constantine and his pious sons." JSusebius. 13 If, however, there should be yet in the mind of any per- son a lingering doubt as to whether Constantine's Sunday legislation was religious only, with no thought of any civil character whatever, even this must certainly be effectually removed by the Fifth Count. It was by virtue of his office and author- ity as Pontifex Maximus, and not as emperor, that the day was set apart to this use ; because it was the sole preroga- tive of the Pontifex Maximus to appoint holy days. In proof of this, we have excellent authority in the evidence of two competent witnesses. Here is the first : 13 " Life of Constantine," book iv, chap. xx. 318 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. "The rescript, indeed, for the religious observance of the Sunday . . . was enacted . . . for the whole Roman empire. Yet, unless we had direct proof that the decree set forth the Christian reason for the sanctity of the day, it may be doubted whether the act would not be received by the greater part of the empire, as merely adding one more festival to the Fasti of the empire, as proceeding entirely from the will of the emperor, or even grounded on Ms authority as Supreme Pontiff, by which he had the plenary power of appointing holy-days." Afilman. 1 * It is true that this statement is qualified by the clause "unless we had direct proof that the decree set forth the Christian reason for the sanctity of the day ; " but this quali- fication is wholly removed by another statement from the same author, which reads as follows : " The rescript commanding the celebration of the Christian Sabbath bears no allusion to its peculiar sanctity as a Christian institution. It is the day of the sun, which is to be observed by the general veneration. . . . But the believer in the new paganism, of which the solar worship was the characteristic, might acquiesce without scruple in the sanctity of the first day of the week. " 15 This is confirmed by another authority as follows : "There is no reference whatever in his law either to the fourth, commandment or the resurrection of Christ." Schaff. 16 Therefore, as it is admitted that unless we had direct proof that the decree set forth the Christian reason for the sanctity of the day, it was merely adding one more festival to the Fasti of the empire, the appointment of which lay in the plenary power of the Pontifex Maximus, and as it is plainly stated that there is no such proof , this plainly proves that the authority for the appointment of the day lay in the office of the Pontifex Maximus, and that authority was wholly religious. Our second witness testifies as follows : "A law of the year 321 ordered tribunals, shops, and workshops to be closed on the day of the sun, and he [Constantine] sent to the legions, 14 "Histoiy of Christianity," book iii, chap, iv, par. 9 from the end. 15 Jd.j chap, i, par. 44. 16 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 75, par. 5. COUNCIL OF NICE AGAINST THE JEWS. 319 to be recited upon that day, a form of prayer which could have been employed by a worshiper of Mithra, of Serapis, or of Apollo, quite as well as by a Christian believer. This was the official sanction of the old custom of addressing a prayer to the rising sun. In determining what days should be regarded as holy, and in the composition of a prayer for national use, CONSTANTINE EXERCISED ONE OF THE RIGHTS BELONGING TO HIM AS PONTIFEX MAXiMUs ; and it caused no surprise that he should do this. " Duruy. lT In the face of such evidence as this, to attempt to give to the Sunday legislation of Constantine a civil character, to say the very least, seems to spring from a wish to have it so, rather than from a desire to give the facts simply as they are. The Council of Nice in A. D. 325 gave another impetus to the Sunday movement. It decided that the Roman cus- tom of celebrating Easter on Sunday only should be followed throughout the whole empire. The council issued a letter to the churches, in which is the following passage on this subject : " We have also gratifying intelligence to communicate to you rela- tive to unity of judgment on the subject of the most holy feast of Easter : for this point also has been happily settled through your prayers ; so that all the brethren in the East who have heretofore kept this festival when the Jews did, will henceforth conform to the Romans and to us, and to all who from the earliest time have observed our period of cele- brating Easter." 18 This was followed up by a letter from " Constantine Au- gustus to the Churches, " in which upon this point he said : " The question having been considered relative to the most holy day of Easter, it was determined by common consent that it would be proper that all should celebrate it on one and the same day everywhere. . . . And in the first place it seemed very unsuitable in the celebration of this sacred feast, that we sJiould follow tlie custom of the Jews ; a people who, having imbrued their hands in a most heinous outrage, and thus polluted their souls, are deservedly blind. . . . Let us then have nothing in common with that most Jiostile people the Jews. . . . Surely we should never suffer 17 " History of Rome," chap, cii, part i, par. 4 from the end. 18 Socrates's " Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap ix. 320 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. Easter to be kept twice in one and the same year. But even if these con- siderations were not laid before you, it became your prudence at all times to take heed, both by diligence and prayer, that the purity of your soul should in nothing have communion, or seem to have accordance with the customs of men so utterly depraved. . . . "Since then it was desirable that this should be so amended that we should have nothing in common with that nation of parricides, and of those- who slew their Lord ; and since the order is a becoming one which is observed by all the churches of the western, southern, and northern parts, and by some also in the eastern ; from these considerations all have on the present occasion thought it to be expedient, and I pledged myself that it would be satisfactory to your prudent penetration, that what is observed with such general unanimity of sentiment in the city of Rome, throughout Italy, Africa, all Egypt, Spain, France, Britain, Libya, the whole of Greece, and the dioceses of Asia, Pontus, and Cilicia, your intelligence also would readily concur in. Reflect, too, that not only is there a greater number of churches in the places before mentioned, but also that this in particular is a most sacred obligation, that all should in common desire whatever strict reason seems to demand, and which has no communion with the perjury of the Jews. "But to sum up matters briefly, it was determined by common con- sent that the most holy festival of Easter should be solemnized on one and the same day ; for in such a hallowed solemnity any difference is unseemly, and it is more commendable to adopt that opinion in which there will be no intermixture of strange error, or deviation from what is right. These things therefore being thus ordered, do you gladly receive this heavenly and truly divine command ; for whatever is done in the sacred assemblies of the bishops is referable to the divine will." This throws much light upon the next move that was made, as these things were made the basis of further action by the church. At every step in the course of the apostasy, at every step taken in adopting the forms of sun worship, and against the adoption and the observance of Sunday itself, there had been constant protest by all real Christians. Those who remained faithful to Christ and to the truth of the pure word of God observed the Sabbath of the Lord according to the commandment, and according to the word of God which sets forth the Sabbath as the sign by which the Lord, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, is distinguished SABBATH-KEEPERS ACCURSED FROM CHRIST. 321 from all other gods. These accordingly protested against every phase and form of sun worship. Others compromised, especially in the East, by observing both Sabbath and Sun- day. But in the west under Roman influences and under the leadership of the church and the bishopric of Rome, Sunday alone was adopted and observed. Against this Church and State intrigue throughout, there had been also as against every other step in the course of the apostasy, earnest protest by all real Christians. But when it came to the point where the church would enforce by the power of the State the observance of Sunday, this protest became stronger than ever. And additional strength was given to the protest at this point, by the fact that it was urged in the words of the very arguments which the Catholic Church had used when she was antagonized rather than courted by the imperial authority. This, with the strength of the argument upon the merit of the question as to the day which should be observed, greatly weakened the force of the Sunday law. But when, in addition to these consid- erations, the exemption was so broad, and when those who observed the Sabbath positively refused to obey the Sunday law, its effect was virtually nullified. In order, therefore, to the accomplishment of her origi- nal purpose, it now became necessary for the church to secure legislation extinguishing all exemption, and prohibit- ing the observance of the Sabbath so as to quench that pow- erful protest. And now, coupled with the necessity of the situation, the "truly divine command" of Constantine and the Council of Nice that "nothing" should be held "in common with the Jews," was made the basis and the au- thority for legislation, utterly to crush out the observance of the Sabbath of the Lord, and to establish the observance of Sunday only in its stead. Accordingly, the Council of Laodicea enacted the following canon : "CANON 29. Christians shall not Judaize and be idle on Saturday, but shall work on that day ; but the Lord's day they shall especially 322 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. honor, and, as being Christians, shall, if possible, do no work on that day. If, however, they are found Judaizing, they shall be shut out from Christ." 16 The report of the proceedings of the Council of Laodicea is not dated. A variety of dates has been suggested, of which A. D. 364 seems to have been the most favored. Hefele allows that it may have been as late as 380. But whatever the date, before A. D. 380, in the political condi- tion of the empire, this could not be made effective by im- perial law. In A. D. 364 Yalens and Valentinian became emperors, the former of the East and the latter of the West. For six years, Yalens was indifferent to all parties ; but in A. D. 370 he became a zealous Arian, and so far as in him lay, established the Arian doctrine throughout his dominion. Valentinian, though a Catholic, kept himself aloof from all differences or controversies among church parties. This continued till 3Y5, when Valentinian died, and was suc- ceeded by his two sons, one aged sixteen, the other four, years. In 3Y8 the reign of Valens ended, and Theodosius, a Spanish soldier, was appointed emperor of the East. In 380 he was baptized into the Catholic Church, and imme- diately an edict was issued in the name of the three emper- ors, commanding all subjects of the empire, of whatever party or name, to adopt the faith of the Catholic Church, and assume the name of "Catholic Christians." As now " the State itself recognized the church as such, and endeavored to uphold her in the prosecution of her prin- ciples and the attainment of her ends" (Neander 11 ) ; and 16 Hefele's "History of the Church Councils," Laodicea. In both the Greek and Latin copies of this canon, the word " Sabbath " is used instead of " Saturday," and the wotd "anathema" accursed is the one which Hefele translates "shut out." The following is the Latin: " Quod non oportet Christianos Juda- izere et otiare in Sabbato, sed operari in eodem die. Preferentes autem In yen- eratione Dominicum diem si vacare voluerint, ut Christian! hoc faciat ; quod si reperti fuerint Judaizere Anathema sint a Christo." 17 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Sectiou Third, part ii, div. iii, par. 4. ALL EXEMPTION ABOLISHED. 323 as Theodosius had already ordered that all his subjects "should steadfastly adhere to the religion which was taught by St. Peter to the Romans, which faithful tradition " had preserved, and which was then "professed by the pontiff, Damasus " of Rome ; and that they should all "assume the title of Catholic Christians ; " it was easy to bring the impe- rial power to the support of the decrees of the church, and make the Laodicean Canon effective. Now was given the opportunity for which the church had waited so long, and she made use of it. At the earliest possible moment she secured the desired law ; for, says the record : "By a law of the year 386, those older changes effected by the em- peror Constantine were more rigorously enforced ; and, in general, civil transactions of every kind on Sunday were strictly forbidden. Whoever transgressed was to be considered, in fact, as guilty of sacrilege." Neander. 1 * As the direct result of this law, there soon appeared an evil which, under the circumstances and in the logic of the case, called for further legislation in the same direction. The law forbade all work. But as the people had not such religion as would cause them to devote the day to pious and moral exercises, the effect of the law was only to enforce idleness. Enforced idleness only multiplied opportunity for dissipation. As the natural consequence, the circuses and the theaters throughout the empire were crowded every Sun- day. But the object of the law, from the first one that was issued, was that the day might be used for the purposes of devotion, and that the people might go to church. But they had not sufficient religion to lead them to church, when there was opportunity for amusement. Therefore, the record is : "Owing to the prevailing passion at that time, especially in the large cities, to run after the various public shows, it so happened that when these spectacles fell on the same days which had been consecrated by the church to some religious festival, they proved a great hinderance 18 Id. 324 THE ORIGINAL SUNDAY LEGISLATION. to the devotion of Christians, though chiefly, it must be allowed, to those whose Christianity was the least an affair of the life and of the heart." Neander. 19 Assuredly ! An open circus or theater will always prove a great hinderance to the devotion of those Christians whose Christianity is the least an affair of the life and of the heart. In other words, an open circus or theater will always be a great hinderance to the devotion of those who have not religion enough to keep them from going to it, but who only want to use the profession of religion to maintain their popu- larity, and to promote their selfish interests. On the other hand, to the devotion of those whose Christianity is really an affair of the life and of the heart, an open circus or theater will never be a particle of hinderance, whether open at church time or all the time. With the people there, how- ever, if the circus and theater were open at the same time as the church, the church-members, as well as others, not being able to go to both places at once, would go to the cir- cus or the theater instead of to the church. But this was not what the bishops wanted. This was n^t that for which all work had been forbidden. All work had been forbidden in order that the people might go to church ; but instead of that, they crowded to the circus and the theater, and the audiences of the bishops were rather slim. This was not at all satisfying to their pride ; and they took care to let it be known. " Church teachers . . . were, in truth, often forced to complain that in such competitions the theater was vastly more frequented than the church." - Neandcr. And the church was now in a condition in which she could not bear competition. She must have a monopoly. Therefore the next step to be taken, and the logical one, too, was to have the circuses and theaters closed on Sundays and other special church days, so that the churches and the theaters should not be open at the same time. 19 Id, par. 5. Id. o fc H i i P . 325, which met at the city of Nice, the latter part of May or the first part of June, in that year. The number of bishops that composed the council was three hundred and eighteen, while the number of "the pres- byters and deacons, in their train, and the crowd of acolytes and other attendants, was altogether beyond computation " (Eusebius n \ all of whom traveled, and were entertained to and from the council and while there, at the public expense. "They came as fast as they could run, in almost a frenzy of excitement and enthusiasm ; the actual crowd must have been enough to have metamorphosed the place." And "shrill above all other voices, vehement above all other disputants, ' brandishing their arguments like spears, against those who sat under the same roof and ate off the same tables as themselves,' were the combatants from Alexandria, who had brought to its present pass the question which the council was called to decide."-- Stanley. n 12 Id., book iii, chap. viii. 13 " History of the Eastern Church," Lecture iii, par. 22, CHARACTER OF THE BISHOPS. 343 The emperor did not arrive at Nice for several days after the others had reached that place ; but when he came, "He had no sooner taken up his quarters in the palace of Nicsea, than he found showered in upon him a number of parchment rolls, or letters, containing complaints and petitions against each other from the larger part of the assembled bishops. We cannot ascertain with certainty whether they were col- lected in a single day, or went on accumulating day after day. It was a poor omen for the unanimity which he had so much at heart. . . . We are expressly told both by Eusebius and Sozomen, that one motive which had drawn many to the council was the hope of settling their own pri- vate concerns, and promoting their own private interests. . . . There, too, were the pent-up grudges and quarrels of years, which now for the first time had an opportunity of making themselves heard. Never before had these remote, often obscure, ministers of a persecuted sect come within the range of imperial power. He whose presence was for the first time so close to them, bore the same authority of which the apostle had said that it was the supreme earthly distributer of justice to mankind. Still after all due allow- ance, it is impossible not to share in the emperor's astonish- ment that this should have been the first act of the first (Ecumenical Assembly of the Christian Church." Stanley. , u 14 7d., Lecture iv, par. 2, 3. I take this occasion to remark that which has already become apparent, and which becomes more and more emphatic as the history proceeds, that the term "Christian" in such connection as it is here used by Stanley, is totally misapplied. This was not an assembly of the Christian Church ; it was not the Christian Church that united with the State. This was an assembly of the Catholic Church ; it was the Catholic Church that formed the union with the State. The history of " the church " is not the history of Chris- tianity. The history of Christianity has not been written except by the rack, by sword, and by flame ; in tears, in sufferings, and in blood, and in the books that shall be opened at the last day. Faithfulness to the authors whom I quote will oblige me in a few instances to copy this misapplication of the word "Christian." But the reader will need merely to note the connection to see that the word is sadly misused, and this note will be the assurance in every such case that I do not indorse the use of the word in anv such connection. 344: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH. The council met in a large hall in the palace of the em- peror, which had been arranged for the purpose. In the center of the room on a kind of throne, was placed a copy of the gospels ; at one end of the hall was placed a richly carved throne, which was to be occupied by Constantine. The day came for the formal opening of the assembly. The bishops were all assembled with their accompanying presby- ters and deacons ; but as it was an imperial council, it could not be opened but by the emperor himself ; and they waited in silence for him to come. " At last a signal from without probably a torch raised by the ' cursor' or avant-courier announced that the emperor was close at hand. The whole assembly rose and stood on their feet ; and then for the first time set their admiring gaze on Constantine, the conqueror, the august, the great. "He entered. His towering stature, his strong-built frame, his broad shoulders, his handsome features, were wor- thy of his grand position. There was a brightness in his look and mingled expression of fierceness and gentleness in his lion-like eye, which well became one who, as Augustus be- fore him, had fancied, and perhaps still fancied, himself to be the favorite of the sun-god Apollo. The bishops were fur- ther struck by the dazzling, perhaps barbaric, magnificence of his dress. Always careful of his appearance, he was so on this occasion in an eminent degree. His long hair, false or real, was crowned with the imperial diadem of pearls. His purple or scarlet robe blazed with precious stones and gold embroidery. He was shod no doubt in the scarlet shoes then confined to emperors, now perpetuated in the pope and cardinals. Many of the bishops. had probably never seen any greater functionary than a remote provincial magistrate, and gazing at his splendid figure as he passed up the hall between their ranks, remembering too what he had done for their faith and for their church, we may well believe that the simple and the worldly both looked upon CONST ANTINE'S PLACE IN THE COUNCIL. 345 him, as though lie were an angel of God, descended straight from heaven." Stanley. He paraded thus up the whole length of the hall to where the seat of wrought gold had been set for him ; then he turned, facing the assembly, and pretended to be so abashed by the presence of so much holiness, that he would not take his seat until the bishops had signalled to him to do so ; then he sat down, and the others followed suit. On one side of Constantine sat Hosius, on the other, Eusebius. As soon as all had taken their seats after the entrance of Constantine, Eusebius arose and delivered an oration in honor of the emperor, closing with a hymn of thanksgiving to God, for Constantino's final victory over Licinius. Eusebius resumed his seat, and Constantine arose and delivered to the assembly the following address : "It has, my friends, been the object of my highest wishes, to enjoy your sacred company, and having obtained this, I confess my thankfulness to the King of all, that in addition to all my other blessings, he has granted to me this greatest of all I mean, to receive you all assembled together, and to see one common, harmonious opinion of all. Let, then, no en- vious enemy injure our happiness, and after the destruction of the im- pious power of the tyrants by the might of God our Saviour, let not the spirit of evil overwhelm the divine law with blasphemies ; for to me far worse than any war or battle is the civil war of the church of God ; yes, far more painful than the wars which have raged, without. As, then, by the assent and co-operation of a higher power I have gained my victo- ries over my enemies, I thought that nothing remained but to give God thanks, and to rejoice with those who have been delivered by us. But since I learned of your divisions, contrary to all expectations, I gave the report my first consideration ; and praying that this also might be healed through my assistance, I called you all together without delay. I re- joice at the mere sight of your assembly ; but the moment that I shall consider the chief fulfillment of my prayers, will be when I see you all joined together in heart and soul, and determining on one peaceful har- mony for all, which it should well become you who are consecrated to God, to preach to others. Do not, then, delay, my friends ; do not delay, ministers of .God, and good servants of our common Lord and Saviour, to remove all grounds of difference, and to wind up by laws of 15 Id., par. 4. 346 ESTABLISIDfENT OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH. peace every link of controversy. Thus will you have done what is most pleasing to the God who is over all, and you will render the greatest boon to me, your fellow-servant." 16 Thus the council was formally opened, and then the emperor signified to the judges of the assembly to go on with the proceedings. " From this moment the flood-gates of debate were opened wide ; and from side to side recrimi- nations and accusations were bandied to and fro, without regard to the imperial presence. He remained unmoved amid the clatter of angry voices, turning from one side of the hall to the other, giving his whole attention to the ques- tions proposed, bringing together the violent partisans." Stanley. 11 To end their personal spites, and turn their whole attention to the question which was to come properly before the assembly, he took from the folds of his mantle the whole bundle of their complaints and recriminations against one another, which they had submitted to him immediately upon his arrival. He laid the bundle out be- fore the assembly bound up, and sealed with the imperial ring. Then, after stating that he had not read one of them, he ordered a brazier to be brought in, and at once burned them in the presence of the whole assembly. As they were burning, he addressed the authors of them in the following words : " 'You have been made by God priests and rulers, to judge and de- cide, . . . and have even been made gods, so highly raised as you are above men ; for it is written, "I have said ye are gods, and ye are all the children of the Most High ; " " and God stood in the congregation of the gods, and in the midst he judges the gods." You ought really to neglect these common matters, and devote yourselves to the things of God. It is not for me to judge of what awaits the judgment of God only.' And as the libels vanished into ashes, he urged them, 'Never to let the faults of men in their consecrated offices be publicly known to the scandal and temptation of the multitude.' ' Nay,' he added, doubt- less spreading out the folds of his imperial mantle as he spoke, 'even though I were with my own eyes to see a bishop in the act of gross sin, I would throw my purple robe over him, that no one might suffer from the sight of such a crime.' " 18 16 Stanley, Id., par. 6. 17 /. 361, he was murdered by the pagans. In the fifth century A. D. 494 Pope Gela- sius made him a martyr. In the sixth century he was worshiped as a Catholic saint; and since the Crusades, he has been "the renowned Saint George of En- gland, patron of arms, of chivalry, and of the Garter." 2 5 " Ecclesiastical History," book ii, chap. xvii. LIBERIUS BECOMES ARIAN AND 18 RECALLED. The next day the edict of recall was read in the circus, but it provided that the two bishops should rule jointly. It happened to be the most interesting and decisive moment of a horse-race, but the excited feelings of the multitude were turned in an instant to the more absorbing question of the orthodox faith. Some cried in ridicule that the edict was just, because there were two factions in the circus, and now each one could have its own bishop. Others shouted, "What, because we have two factions in the circus, are we to have two factions in the church?" Then the whole multitude set up one universal yell, "There is but one God, one Christ, one bishop ! " Upon which Theodoret devoutly remarks, "Sometime after this Christian people had uttered these pious and just acclamations, the holy Liberius returned, and Felix retired to another city." 26 It is true that Liberius returned soon after this, but Con- stantius had made it the condition of his return that he should sign the decisions of the Council of Milan. Two years' sojourn in cold and barbarous Thrace, while a rival bishop was enjoying the splendors of the episcopal office in Rome, exerted a strong tendency to convince Liberius that Athanasius was rightly condemned, and that the Arian doc- trine might be true. He therefore signed both the condem- nation of Athanasius and the Arian creed of Milan. Upon this Constantius called him to Sirmium. But as in the mean- time the emperor had changed his views and adopted the Semi-Arian doctrine, he would not allow Liberius to return to Rome unless he would first subscribe to the same. Libe- rius signed this also, and was allowed to go on his way to Rome. The people poured out through the gates to meet him, and escorted him in triumph to the episcopal palace, August 2, 358. "The adherents of Felix were inhumanly murdered in the streets, in the public places, in the baths, and even in the churches ; and the face of Rome, upon the return of a Christian bishop, renewed the horrid image of the massacres of Marius and the proscriptions of Sylla." ., and Bower, " History of the Popes," Liberius, par. 7. 376 AHIANISM BECOMES ORTHODOX. (ribbon.*" 1 Felix escaped, but returned not long afterward, and attempted to hold services in a church beyond the Tiber, but was again driven out. As stated above, Constantius had again changed his opinions as to the nature of Christ, adopting the Semi-Arian view. The Semi-Arian party was a third one that had grown up between the strictly Arian and the Athanasian, based upon a third mental abstraction as elusive as either of the others. The three doctrines now stood thus : The Athanasians declared the Son of God to be of the same substance, the same existence, and the same essence, with the Father. The strict Arians declared the Son to be like the Father, but rather by grace than by nature, as like as a creature could be to the Creator. The Semi-Arians declared the Son to be like the Father in nature, in existence, in essence, in substance, and in every- thing else. The Athanasian doctrine was expressed in Ilomoousion / the strict Arian in Anomean / and the Semi-Arian in I'lomoiousion. It will be seen that the Semi-Arian was nearer to the original doctrine of Arius than was the Arian of the present period. This was owing to the followers of Eusebius of Nicomedia, who in the bitterness of their opposition to the Athanasians, were carried away from the original Arian doctrine from the Ilomoiousion to the Anomean. The flomoousion was the doctrine of the Council of Nice ; the Anomean was the doctrine of the Council of Milan ; the Ilomoiousion was the doctrine now held by Constantius, and a company that actually outnumbered the Arians. In furtherance of his "visionary" commission to give peace to the church, Constantius determined to call a gen- eral council, and have the Semi-Arian doctrine adopted. The council was first appointed to meet at Nicomedia, A. D. ""Decline and Fall," chap, xxi, par. 85. DOUBLE COUNCIL RIMINI AND SELEUCIA. 358, but while the bishops were on the way there, an earth- quake destroyed that city. The appointment was then changed to Nice in early summer, 359. But before that time arrived, he decided to have two councils instead of one, that all might more easily attend. The bishops of the East were to meet at Seleucia in Isauria ; those of the West at Rimini on the Adriatic Sea in Italy. The emperor issued an order commanding all bishops without exception to attend one or the other, as they might choose, and the civil officers in the provinces were commis- sioned to see that the command was obeyed. "The bish- ops therefore set out from all parts ; the public carriages, roads, and houses were everywhere crowded with them, which gave great offense to the catechumens, and no small diversion to the pagans, who thought it equally strange and ridiculous that men who had been brought up from their infancy in the Christian religion, and whose business it was to instruct others in that belief, should be constantly hurrying, in their old age, from one place to another, to know what they themselves should believe." Boicer To make sure that the two councils should act as one, it was ordered that each should appoint two deputies to report to the emperor the decisions arrived at, " that he might him- self know whether they had come to an understanding in accordance with the Holy Scriptures, and might decide ac- cording to his own judgment what was best to be done." ** In the summer of A. D. 359, more than four hundred bishops assembled at Rimini, of whom eighty were Arians. One hundred and sixty assembled at Seleucia, of whom one hundred and five were Semi-Arians ; about forty were Arians, while the Catholics were still fewer in number. A civil officer of high rank was appointed to represent the emperor at each council, and the one appointed to Rimini was directed not to allow any bishop to go home until all "had come to one mind concerning the faith." That there 88u History of the Popes," Liberius, par. 21. M Hefele's " History of the Church Councils," sec. 82, par. 1. 3Y8 ARIANISM BECOMES ORTHODOX. might be as little difficulty as possible in coming co one mind, a creed was drawn up and sent to the council to be signed. There were at that time present with the emperor at Sirmium five bishops, one of whom was George of Alex- andria, and all of whom were Arians or Semi-Arians. They drew up a creed, the main points of which were as fol- lows : "We believe in one only and true God, the Father and Ruler of all, Creator and Demiurge of all things, and in one only begotten Son of God, who was begotten of the Father without change before all ages, and all be- ginning, and all conceivable time, and all comprehensible substance. . . . God from God, similar to the Father, who has begotten him according to the Holy Scriptures, whose generation no one knows [understands] but the Father who has begotten him. . . . The word ousia, because it was used by the Fathers in simplicity [that is, with good intention], but not being understood by the people, occasions scandal, and is not con- tained in the Scriptures, shall be put aside, and in future no mention shall be made of the Usia with regard to God. . . . But we maintain that the Son is similar to the Father in all things, as also the Holy Scriptures teach and say." so The emperor sent a letter to each council, commanding that the bishops should settle the question of the faith before they should have anything to do with an investigation of any of their own private differences. The council at Kimini was already met, and was earnestly discussing the faith, when the bishops arrived from Sirmium with the above creed, which they read aloud to the assembly, and "declared that it was already confirmed by the emperor, and was now to be universally accepted without discussion, as to the sense*which individuals might attach to its words." To this all the Arians in the council readily agreed, but the Catholics, with loud voices, proclaimed their dissent. They declared that any new formula of faith was wholly unnecessary ; that the Council of Nice had done all that was necessary in regard to the faith ; and that the business of the council was not to find out what was the true faith, but to put to confusion all its opponents. They demanded that the bishops who brought 30 /<*., par. 2. TUB EMPEROR' S CREED DECLARED HERETICAL. 379 this creed should with them unanimously curse all heresies, and especially the Arian. This demand was refused by the Arians. Then the Catholics took everything into their own hands. They unanimously approved the Nicene Creed, especially the Homoousion / and then declared heretical the creed which had come from the emperor. They next took up the doctrine of Arianism, and pronounced a curse upon each particular point ; denounced by name the bishops who had come from the emperor as "ignorant and deceitful men, imposters, and heretics; and declared them deposed. 1 ' Finally, they unanimously pronounced a curse upon all here- sies in general, and that of Arius in particular. All this they put in writing ; every one of them signed it July 21, A. D. 359, and sent it by the ten deputies, to the emperor, accompanied by a request that he would allow them to return to their churches. At the same time the Arians of the council also sent ten deputies to Constantius, who reached the emperor before the others, and made their report. When the others arrived, Constantius refused even to see them so much as to receive their report, but sent an officer to receive it, and under the pretext of being overwhelmed with public business, kept them waiting. After they had waited a long time, they were directed to go to Adrianople and await the emperor's pleasure, and at the same time he sent a letter to the bishops at Rimini, commanding them to wait there the return of their deputies. Shortly afterwards the deputies were ordered to go to a small town called Nice, not many miles from Adrianople. This was a trick of the Arians and Semi-Arians, by which they proposed to have their creed signed there, and then pass it off upon the uninitiated, as the original creed of the Council of Nice in Bithynia. There the creed was presented, but with the omission "in all things," so that it read, "the Son is like to the Father," instead of, " like to the Father in all things." This the deputies were required to sign, which of course they refused to do, but were finally forced to sign it, 30 ARIANISM BECOMES ORTHODOX. and to reverse all the acts and proceedings of the Council of Rimini. The emperor was highly pleased at this result, and calling it a good omen of like success with the whole council, gave the ten deputies leave to return to Rimini. At the same time he sent letters to the prefect, commanding him anew not to allow a single bishop to leave until all had signed, and to exile whoever should persist in a refusal, provided the number did not exceed fifteen. The bishops were "eager to return to their sees; the emperor was inflexible ; Taurus took care to render the place both inconvenient and disagreeable to them. Some there- fore fell off, others followed their example, the rest began to waver, and being so far got the better of, yielded soon after, and went over to the Arian party in such crowds that in a very short time the number of the orthodox bishops who continued steady, was reduced to twenty." Bower. ^ At the head of these twenty was a certain Phsebadius, and they determined invincibly to hold their position. Nevertheless they were caught by a trick that the veriest tyro ought to have seen. Two bishops in particular, Ursa- cius and Valens, had charge of the creed, and they pretended in the interests of peace to be willing to make a concession, and to insert such alterations and additions as might be agreeable to Phsebadius, who exulted over the proud dis- tinction which would thus be his as the preserver of or- thodoxy. They came together, and began to reconstruct the creed : first were inserted some curses against the Arian heresy, then an addition, declaring the Son to be "equal to the Father, without beginning, and before all things." When this was written, Talons proposed that in order to leave no room whatever for any new disputes or any question upon this point, there should be added a clause declaring that "the Son of God is not a creature like other creatures." To 31 " History of the Popes," Liberius, par. 24. THE WORLD BECOMES ARTAN. 381 this the twenty bishops assented, blindly overlooking the fact that in admitting that the Son was not a creature like oilier creatures, they did indeed place him among the creat- ures, and admitted the very point upon which the Arians had all the time insisted. Thus all were brought to ' ' the unity of the faith." The council broke up, and the bishops departed to their homes. The council was past, and no sooner did the Arians find themselves secure, than they loudly proclaimed the victory which they had gained. They gloried in the fact that the great council of Rimini had not declared that the Son was not a creature, but only that he was not like other creatures. They affirmed that it was, and always had been, their opin- ion that the " Son was no more like the Father than a piece of glass was like an emerald." Upon examination of the creed, the twenty bishops were obliged to confess that they had been entrapped. They renounced the creed, and pub- licly retracted "all they had said, done, or signed, repugnant to the truths of the Catholic Church." Bower. The companion council which was called at Seleucia, met September 27, 359, but as there were three distinct parties, besides individuals who differed from all, there was amongst them such utter confusion, tumult, and bitterness, that after four days of angry debate, in which the prospect became worse and worse, the imperial officer declared that he would have nothing more to do with the council, and told them they could go to the church if they wanted to, and "indulge in this vain babbling there as much as they pleased." The parties then met separately, denounced, condemned, and ex- communicated one another, and sent their deputies to Con- stantius, who spent a whole day and the greater part of the night, December 31, 359, in securing their signatures to the confession of faith which he had approved. The emperor's confession was then published throughout the whole empire, and all bishops were commanded to sign it, under penalty s ~Td., par. 24, 25. 382 ARIANISM BECOMES ORTHODOX. of exile upon all who refused. "This order was executed with the utmost rigor in all the provinces of the empire, and very few were found who did not sign with their hands what they condemned in their hearts. Many who till then had been thought invincible, were overcome, and complied with the times ; and such as did not, were driven, without distinction, from their sees into exile, and others appointed in their room, the signing of that confession being a qualifi- cation indispensably requisite both in obtaining and keeping the episcopal dignity. Thus were all the sees throughout the empire filled with Arians, insomuch that in the whole East not an orthodox bishop was left, and in the West but one ; namely, Gregory, bishop of Elvira in Andalusia, and he, in all likelihood, obliged to absent himself from his flock and lie concealed. "--Bower. Thus Constantius had succeeded much more fully than had his father, in establishing "the unity of the faith." That faith was the original Arian. And Arianism was now as entirely orthodox, and, if the accommodated sense of the word be used, as entirely Catholic, as Athanasianism had ever been. Having like his father, by the aid of the bishops, united the world " under one head," and brought the opinions re- specting the Deity to a condition of "settled uniformity," the emperor Constantius died the following year, A. D. 361. 33 / 11 " Ecclesiastical History," book vi, chap, xviii. 15 " History of the Popes," Innocent T, par. 8. 410 MAKf IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. hitherto done in his behalf. Having therefore much at heart the peace of the church, which will be attended with that of our empire, I write to you anew by these holy bishops and presbyters, earnestly desiring you to command the Eastern bishops to assemble at Thessalonica. The Western bishops have sent five of their body, two presbyters of the Roman Church, and one deacon, all men of strictest equity, and quite free from the bias of favor and hatred. These I beg you would receive with that regard which is due to their rank and merit. If they find John to have been justly deposed, they may separate me from his com- munion ; and you from the communion of the orientals, if it appears that he has been unjustly deposed. The Western bishops have very plainly expressed their sentiments, in the many letters they have written to me on the subject of the present dispute. Of these I send you two, the one from the bishop of Rome, the other from the bishop of Aquileia ; and with them the rest agree. One thing I must above all beg of your Meekness ; that you oblige Theophilus of Alexandria to assist at the council, how averse soever he may be to it ; for he is said to be the first and chief author of the present calamities. Thus the synod, meeting with no delays or obstructions, will restore peace and tranquillity in our days." 16 Not only were the letters of Honorius disregarded, but his ambassadors were insulted and abused ; which when he learned, he was about to declare war, but was prevented by an invasion of the barbarians. Thus the efforts to obtain a general council upon this question came to naught. When Innocent learned this, he determined to take the side of Chrysostom. He therefore published a letter announcing the fact, and separating from his communion Theophilus and all who were of his party. Chrysostom died in 407 ; but the quarrel was continued by the bishop of Rome, who refused to communicate with the new bishop of Constantinople, unless he would acknowledge that Chrysostom was lawful bishop of that city until the day of his death. As this would be to acknowledge that his own election to the bishopric of Constantinople was unlawful, Atticus refused ; and the contention was kept up seven years longer, but was finally compromised in 414. The empress Eudoxia died about A. D. 405. The em- peror Arcadius died May 1, A. D. 408, leaving a son 16 Bower, Id., par. 14. GYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA. 411 Theodosius II seven years of age, heir to the throne, and a daughter, Pulcheria, ten years of age, who, after A. D. 414, held the most important place in the affairs of the empire for forty years. At the age of twenty and by the arts of Pulcheria, Theodosius II was married to Eudocia, wljo was nearly eight years older than himself, and the incapable youth was kept in a "perpetual infancy, encompassed only with a servile train of women and eunuchs," and ruled by women, eunuchs, and monks. The war with Chrysostom was ended, yet the roots of bitterness and seeds of strife still remained between Alexan- dria and Constantinople. And though -the two men who were bishops of these two cities were in harmony so far as the confusion about Chrysostom was c6ncerned, the same jealousy as to the dignity of their respective sees still existed, and soon broke out more violently than ever before. The subject of the next dispute was a question of doctrine, and, like that over the Homoousion, was so illusive, and the dis- putants believed so nearly alike and yet were so determined not to believe alike, and the men who led in it were so ar- rogant and cruel, that from the beginning the contention was more violent than any that had yet been. In A. D. 412, Cyril, the nephew of Theophilus, became bishop of Alexandria. He was one of the very worst men of his time. He began his episcopacy by shutting up the churches of the Novatians, "the most innocent and harm- less of the sectaries," and taking possession of all their ecclesiastical ornaments and consecrated vessels, and strip- ping their bishop, Theopernptus, of all his possessions. Nor was Cyril content with the exercise of such strictly episcopal functions as these : he aspired to absolute authority, civil as well as ecclesiastical. He drove out the Jews, forty thousand in number, de- stroyed their synagogues, and allowed his followers to strip them of all their possessions. Orestes, the prefect of Egypt, displeased at the loss of such a large number of wealthy and 412 MART TS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. industrious people, entered a protest, and sent up a report to the emperor. Cyril likewise wrote to the emperor. No answer came from the court, and the people urged Cyril to come to a reconciliation with the prefect, but his advances were made in such a way that the prefect would not receive them. The monks poured in from the desert to the number of about five hundred, to champion the cause of Cyril. Orestes \vas passing through the streets in his chariot. The monks flocked around him, insulted him, and denounced him as a heathen and an idolater. Orestes, thinking that perhaps they thought this was so, and knowing his life to be in danger, called ont that he was a Christian, and had been baptized by Atticus, bishop of Constantinople. His defense was in vain. In answer, one of the monks threw a big stone which struck him on the head, and wounded him so that his face was covered with blood. At this all his guards fled for their lives ; but the populace came to the rescue, and drove off the monks, and captured the one who threw the stone. His name was Ammonius, and the prefect punished him so severely that shortly afterward ho died. "Cyril commanded his body to be taken up ; the honors of a Christian martyr were prostituted on this insolent ruffian, his panegyric was pronounced in the church, and he was named Thaumasius the wonderful." Milman. 11 But the party of Cyril proceeded to yet greater violence than this. At that time there was in Alexandria a teacher of philosophy, a woman, Hypatia by name. She gave pub- lic lectures which were so largely attended by the chief people of the city, that Cyril grew jealous that more people went to hear her lecture than came to hear him preach. She was a friend of Orestes, and it was also charged that she, more than any other, was the cause why Orestes would not be reconciled to Cyril. One day as Hypatia was passing through the street in a chariot, she was attacked by a crowd of Cyril's partisans, whose ring-leader was Peter the Reader. 17 " History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 23. NESTORIU8 OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 413 She was torn from her chariot, stripped naked in the street, dragged into a church, and there beaten to death with a club, by Peter the Header. Then they tore her limb from limb, and with shells scraped the flesh from her bones, and threw the remnants into the fire, March, A. D. 414. This was Cyril, now Saint Cyril, bishop of Alexan- dria. And in addition to his naturally tyrannical and mur- derous disposition, ''jealousy and animosity toward the bishop of Constantinople was a sacred legacy bequeathed by Theophilus to -his nephew, and Cyril faithfully admin- istered the fatal trust." JH-ilnian. 18 In 428, there was appointed to the bishopric of Constan- tinople a monk of Antioch, Nestorius by name, who in wickedness of disposition was only second to Cyril of Alex- andria. In his ordination sermon before the great crowd of people, he personally addressed to the emperor these words : " Give me, my prince, the earth purged of heretics, and I will give you heaven as a recompense. Assist me in destroying heretics, and I will assist you in vanquishing the Persians." 10 The fifth day afterward, in accordance with this proposi- tion, JSTestorius began his part in purging the earth of heretics. There was a little company of Arians who met in a private house for worship ; these were surprised and at- tacked, and as they saw the house being torn to pieces and sacked, they set fire to it, which burned that building and many others adjoining. On account of this, Nestorius received from both parties the appropriate nickname of the "Incendiary."" This attack upon the Arians was followed furiously upon the Quarto-Decimans, who celebrated Easter on a day other than the Catholic Sunday ; and also upon the Novatians. The authority of the emperor somewhat checked his fury against the Novatians, but it raged unmolested against the Quarto-Decimans throughout Asia, Lydia, and Id., par. 21. 19 Socrates's " Ecclesiastical History," book vii, chap. xxix. 414 MARY IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. Caria, and multitudes perished in the tumults which he stirred up, especially at Miletus and Sardis. And now these two desperate men, Nestorius and Cyril, became the respective champions of the two sides of a con- troversy touching the faith of the Catholic Church, as to whether Mary was the Mother of God or not. In the long contention and the fine-spun distinctions as to whether the Son of God is of the same substance, or only of like sub- stance with the Father, Christ had been removed entirely beyond the comprehension of the people. And owing to the desperate character and cruel disposition of the men who carried on the controversy as the representatives of Christ, the members of the church were made afraid of him. And now, instead of Jesus standing forth as the mediator between men and God, he was removed^so far away and was clothed with such a forbidding aspect, that it became necessary to have a mediator between men and Christ. And into this place the Virgin Mary was put. This gave rise to the question as to what was the exact relationship of Mary to Christ. Was she actually the mother of the divinity of Christ, and therefore the Mother of God ? or was she only the mother of the humanity of- Christ ? For a considerable time already the question had been agitated, and among a people whose ancestors for ages had been devout worshipers of the mother goddesses Diana and Cybele the title "Mother of God " was gladly welcomed and strenuously maintained. This party spoke of Mary as "God-bearer;" the opposite party called her only "man- bearer ; " while a third party coming between tried to have all speak of her as " Christ-bearer." As before stated, this question had already been agitated considerably, but when two such characters as Cyril and Nestorius took it up, it speedily became the one all-impor- tant question, and the all-absorbing topic. Nestorius started it in his very first sermon after becoming bishop of Constan- tinople. He denied that Mary could properly be called the CTRIL AND NESTORIUS AT WAR. 415 Mother of God. Some of his priests immediately withdrew from his communion, and began to preach against his heresy, and the monks rushed in also. Nestorius denounced them all as miserable men, called in the police, and had some of them flogged and imprisoned, especially several monks who had accused him to the emperor. From this the controversy spread rapidly, and Cyril, urged on by both natural and inherited jealousy, carue to the rescue in defense of the title, "Mother of God." "Cyril of Alexandria, to those who esteem the stern and uncompromising assertion of certain Christian tenets the one paramount Christian virtue, may be the hero, even the saint : but while ambition, intrigue, arro- gance, rapacity, and violence are proscribed as unchristian means barbarity, persecution, bloodshed as unholy and unevangelical wickedness posterity will condemn'the ortho- dox Cyril as one of the worst of heretics against the spirit of the gospel." Milman. 20 It is not necessary to put into this book the blasphemous arguments of either side. It is enough to say that in this controversy, as in that regarding the Homoomion, the whole dispute was one about words and terms only. Each deter- mined that the other should express the disputed doctrine in his own words and ideas, while he himself could not clearly express his~ideas in words different from the others. "Never was there a case in which the contending parties approxi- mated so closely. Both subscribed, both appealed, to the Nicene Creed ; both admitted the pre-existence, the impassi- bility, of the Eternal Word ; but the fatal duty ... of con- sidering the detection of heresy the first of religious obliga- tions, mingled, as it now was, with human passions and in- terests, made the breach irreparable." Milman. 21 Cyril demanded of Nestorius that he should confess Mary to be the Mother of God, without any distinction, explanation, or qualification. And because Nestorius would 20 "History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 20. par. 15, 416 If ART IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. not comply, Cyril denounced him everywhere as a heretic, stirred up the people of Constantinople against him, and sent letters to the emperor, the empress, and to Pulcheria, to prove to them that the Virgin Mary "ought to be called " the Mother of God. He declared that to dispute such a title was rank heresy, and by adulation, and by declaring that whoever disputed this title was unworthy of the protec- tion of the imperial family, he sought to have the court take his side at once against Nestorius. But Nestorius had the advantage with respect to the court, because he was present in Constantinople. Fierce letters also passed between Cyril and uSTestorius, and both sent off letters to Celestine, bishop of Rome. Nestorius sent his first, but he wrote in Greek, and Celestine had to send it to Gaul to be translated into Latin, so that he could read it. Before the letter of Kestorius was returned from Gaul, Cyril's letter had arrived, which was written in Latin ; with which also he had sent some of the sermons of Nestorius which he had translated into Latin for the benefit of Celestine. Yet further he gave citations to Athanasius and Peter of Alexandria, where they had given to Mary the title of Mother of God. Celestine called a council in Rome, A. D. 430. The letters and papers of both Cyril and Nesto- rius were read, after which Celestine made a long speech to prove that " the Virgin Mary was truly the Mother of God." He supported his view's by quotations from the Eastern bishops, whom Cyril had cited, and also from his predeces- sors Damasus and Hilary, and from Ambrose of Milan who had caused the people on Christmas day every year to sing a hymn in honor of Mary, in which she was called the Mother of God. The council declared that Nestorius was "the author of a new and very dangerous heresy," praised Cyril for oppos- ing it. declared the doctrine of Cyril strictly orthodox, and condemned to deposition all ecclesiastics who should refuse THE BISHOP OF ROME JOINS CYRIL. 417 to adopt it. Celestine conveyed to Nestorius the decision of the council, and in the name of the council and in his own name, commanded him publicly and in a written apology, to renounce his heretical opinions within ten days after the receipt of this letter, or else incur the penalty of excommu- nication. On the same day Celestine also wrote a letter to Cyril, appointing him as his agent to execute the decision of the council, and empowering him in the name, and with the authority, of the apostolic see, to excommunicate and depose JSTestorius, if by the expiration of ten days he had not recanted. Other letters were also sent at the same time to the clergy and laity of Constantinople and to the principal bishops of the East, exhorting them to steadfast- ness in the faith, and declaring that whomsoever Nestorius had excommunicated or deposed on account of this question, should be counted as in communion with the bishop of Rome. All these letters were sent to Cyril, who upon "receiving them, called a council of the Egyptian bishops, and drew up twelve propositions with their respective curses, which Nestorius was to sign if he would obey the sentence of the council at Rome, and recant his opinions. It was also required that Nestorius should not only acknowledge the creed of Nice, but that he must add a written and sworn declaration that he did so, and that he would condemn all his previous "pernicious and unholy assertions," and agree in future to "believe and teach the same as Cyril, and as the synod, and the bishops of the East and West." Hefele. All this with the decree of the Council of Rome was sent by four bishops to Nestorius at Constantinople. These bishops to make as great a display of their authority as pos- sible, went to the cathedral on Sunday, at the time of public service, and delivered the documents to Nestorius, while he was performing the principal service of the day. In answer 22 "History of the Church Couucils," sec. 131, par. 1. 33 418 MARY IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. to these decrees Nestorius, in a sermon preached on the fol- lowing Sabbath, declared that to maintain the peace and tranquillity of the church, "he was ready to grant the title of ' Mother of God ' to the Virgin Mary, providing nothing else was thereby meant but that the man born of her was united to the Divinity." But Cyril insisted that he should adopt the twelve propositions and their curses which the Alex- andrian Synod' had sent. As a final reply Nestorius then drew up twelve counter propositions with their respective curses, to which he demanded that Cyril should subscribe. It was now the middle of December, 430. All the time that these contentions had been going on, both parties had been calling for a general council ; and as early as Novem- ber 19, the emperors Theodosius II and Valentinian III had issued letters ordering a general council to meet at Ephesus in the spring of 431. Of all places in the world, Ephesus was the very one where it would be the nearest to an impossibility to obtain anything like a fair examination of the question. Like Diana of old, the Virgin Mary was now the patroness of Ephesus ; and the worse than heathen Catholics were more fanatically devoted to hei-than even the heathen Ephesians had been to Diana. But a fair examination of the question, or in fact any real examination, was not intended by Celes- tine and Cyril. Their only intention was either the uncon- ditional surrender or the condemnation of Nestorius. Cyril was appointed by Celestine to preside at the council. He addressed Celestine, asking whether Nestorius should be allowed to sit as a member of the council. Celestine told him that he should do everything to restore peace to the church and to win Nestorius to the truth : but that if Nesto- rius was quite determined against this, "then he must reap what, with the help of the devil, he had sown." - Hefele Celestine also sent a letter to the emperor Theodosius II, saying that he could not personally attend the council, but 23 Id., sec. 133. GENERAL COUNCIL OF EPHESUS. 419 that he would take part by commissioners. He desired that the emperor "should allow no innovations, and no disturb- ance of the peace of the church. He should even regard the interests of the faith as higher than those of the State ; and the peace of the church as much more important than th-e peace of the nations." Celestine's instructions to his commissioners were to the same intent. He commanded them to "hold strictly by Cyril," but at the same time to be sure "to preserve the dignity of the apostolic see." They were directed to attend all the meetings of the council, yet to take no part in any of the discussions, but to "give judg- ments " on the views of others. And finally, the letter which Celestine sent by these legates to the bishops in council exhorted them "to preserve the true faith," and closed with these words : "The legates are to be present at the transactions of the synod, and will give effect to that which the pope has long ago decided with respect to Nestorius ; for he does not doubt that the assembled bishops will agree with this." 554 Neither of the emperors was present at the council, but they jointly appointed Count Candidian, captain of the im- perial bodyguard, as the "Protector of the Council." Nes- torius came with sixteen bishops, accompanied by an armed guard composed of bathmen of Constantinople and a horde of peasants. In addition to this, by the special favor of the emperor, an officer, Irenseus, with a body of soldiers, was appointed to protect him. Cyril came wjth fifty Egyptian bishops, and a number of bathmen and "a multitude of women" from Alexandria, and such sailors in his fleet as he could depend upon. Arrived at Ephesus, he was joined by Memnon, bishop of that city, with fifty-two bishops, and a crowd of peasants whom he had drawn into the city. Juve- nalis, bishop of Jerusalem, came with his subordinate bish- ops, we know not the number ; these also were hostile to Nestorius, and joined Cyril and Memnon. Others camo par. 3. 420 MARY JS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. from Thessalonica, Apamea, and Hieropolis, and when the council opened, there were one hundred and ninety-eight bishops present, including the pope's legates, and not including Nestorius. John of Antioch, with the bishops of his diocese, was on the way, but did not reach Ephesus until Cyril's part of the council was over. The council was to have met June 7, 431, but owing to delays on the part of the bishops of Jerusalem, Thessalo- nica, and Antioch, it did not open until June 22, and even then the bishops of Antioch had not arrived. But all the time was spent in preliminary disputes, winning partisans,. and working up the populace. As Cyril had the great majority of the bishops on his side, and as the city was already devoted to the " Mother of God,"" Nestorius was at a great disadvantage, and his enemies did not hesitate to let him know it, and to make him feel it. Cyril preached a sermon in which he paid the following idolatrous tribute to Mary : " Blessed be thou, O Mother of God ! Thou rich treasure of the world, inextinguishable lamp, crown of virginity, scepter of true doc- trine, imperishable temple, habitation of Him whom no space can contain, mother and virgin, through whom He is, who comes in the name of the Lord. Blessed be thou, O Mary, who didst hold in thy womb the Infinite One ; thou through whom the blessed Trinity is glorified and worshiped, through whom the precious cross is adored throughout the world, through whom heaven rejoices and angels and archangels are glad, through whom the devil is disarmed and banished, through whom the fallen creature is restored to" heaven, through whom every believing soul is saved." 25 Cyril and his party urged that the council should be opened without any more delay. As the emperor had par- ticularly required the presence of John of Antioch, JSTesto- rius insisted on waiting till he came ; and Candidian sus- tained Nestorius. Cyril refused, and he and his partisans assembled in the Church of the Virgin Mary to proceed 25 Schaff 's " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 171, par. 10. CONDEMNATION OF NE8TORIUS. -J.91 with the council. As soon as Count Candidian learned of this, he hastened to the church to forbid it, and there he fell into an ecclesiastical trap. He declared that they were act- ing in defiance of the imperial rescript which was to guide the council. They answered that as they had not seen the rescript, they did not know what it required of them. The Count read it to them. This was just what they wanted. They declared that tJt.e reading of the rescript legalized their meeting ! They greeted it with "loud and loyal clamors," pronounced the council begun, and commanded the Count to withdraw from an assembly in which he had no longer any legal place. Candidian protested against the unfairness of the pro- ceedings ; and then, he himself says, they " injuriously and ignominiously ejected " him. They next expelled all the bishops, sixty-eight in number, who were known to favor Nestorius, "and then commenced their proceedings as the legitimate Senate of Christendom." 3filman. srj One of Cyril's presbyters was secretary, and he for- mally opened the business of the council by reading a state- ment of the dispute that had brought them together. Then the emperor's letter calling the council was read. They sent four bishops to notify Nestorius to appear. He courteously refused to acknowledge the legality of their assembly. A second deputation of four bishops was sent, and they returned with the word that they were not allowed by the guard to go near him, but received from his attendants the same answer as before. A third deputation of four was sent, and they returned with the report that they were subjected to the indignity of being kept standing in the heat of the sun, and receiving no answer at all. Having made such an earnest effort to have Nestorius present, but in vain, they "sorrow- fully " commenced the proceedings without him. The Nicene Creed was first read, and then Cyril's letter 25 " History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 49. 422 MARY IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. to Nestorius, with the twelve propositions and their accom- panying curses, all of which were solemnly confirmed by all the bishops in succession. Then was read the letter of Nestorius to Cyril, with the twelve counter-propositions and their curses. One after another the bishops arose and declared the propositions blasphemous, and vehemently uttered the appended curses. Then when the list was completed, they all arose, and with one mighty roar that made the arches of the great church echo and re-echo, they bawled, "Anathema to him who does not anathematize Nestorius! Anathema! Anathema! The n'Jiole world unites in the excommunication! Anathema on him who holds communion with Nestorius! " 2o Next were read the letters of Celestine, condemning him, which were made a part of the acts of the council. Then followed the reading of statements from the writings of Athanasius, Peter of Alexandria, Julius I, Felix I of Rome ; Theophihis of Alexandria, Cyprian, Ambrose, Gregory Nazianzen, Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, Atticus of Constantinople, and Amphilochius of Iconium, all to the effect that Mary was the Mother of God. Then the tender- hearted, pious souls, according to their own words, proceeded "with many tears, to this sorrowful sentence : "- "As, in addition to other things, the impious Nestorius has not obeyed our citation, and did not receive the holy bishops who were sent by us to him, we were compelled to examine his ungodly doctrines. We discovered that he had held and published impious doctrines in his letters and treatises, as well as in discourses which he delivered in this city, and which have been testified to. Urged by the canons, and in accordance with the letter of our most holy father and fellow-servant Celestine, the Roman bishop, we have come, with many tears, to this sorrowful sentence against him, namely, that our Lord Jesus Christ, whom he has blasphemed, decrees by the holy synod that Nestorius be excluded from the episcopal dignity, and from all priestly communion." 27 25 Id., par. 22. 27 Hefele's " History of the Church Councils," sec. 134, par. 6 W EH cc O 525 H^ O O - COUNCIL AGAINST COUNCIL. This sentence the bishops all signed, and then it was sent to Nestorius, addressed, "To Nestorius, a second Judas." All these proceedings, from the visit and protest of Can- didian to the notice to Nestorius, were carried through in a single day and one prolonged sitting. It was now night. Criers were sent all through the city to post up the decrees of the council, and to announce the joyful news that Mary was indeed the Mother of God. Everywhere they were met with loudest shouts of joy. The multitude rushed into the streets and poured toward the church. With lighted torches they escorted the bishops to their abodes, the women marching before and burning in- cense. The whole city was illuminated, and the songs and exultations continued far into the night. The demonstration far outdid that of their lineal ancestors, who, when they tried to kill the apostle Paul, "all with one voice about the space of two hours cried out, Great is Diana of the Ephesians." Five days afterward John of Antioch with his bishops, arrived, and was greatly surprised to learn that the council was over. He got together about fifty bishops, who unani- mously condemned the doctrines of Cyril and the proceed- ings of the council, and declared accursed all the bishops who had taken part in it. Cyril and Memnon answered with counter-curses. Letters came from Celestine, and Cyril's council re-assembled formally to receive them. When they were read, the whole company arose and again cried with one voice : " The council renders thanks to the second Paul, Celestine / to the second Paul, Cyril : to Celes- tine, protector of the faith / to Celestine, unanimous with tJie council. One Celestine, one Cyril, one faith in the whole council, one faith throughout the world f" 2 * Cyril's council next sent messengers with overtures to John, who refused to see them. Then the council declared 28 Milman's " History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 56. 424 MART IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. annulled all the acts of John's council, and deposed and ex- communicated him and all the bishops of his party. John threatened to elect a new bishop of Ephesus in the place of Memnon, whom his council had deposed. A party tried to force their way into the cathedral ; but finding it defended by Memnon with a strong garrison, they retreated. Mem- non's forces made a strong sally, and drove them through the streets with clubs and stones, dangerously wounding many. On learning that the council had been held, and Nesto- rius deposed before the arrival of John of Antioch, a letter had been sent down from the court, but was not received till this point in the contest. This letter annulled all the proceedings of the council, and commanded a re-considera- tion of the question by the whole assembly of the bishops now present. The letter also announced the appointment of another imperial officer, one of the highest officials of the State, to assist Count Candidian. The court had not made known in Constantinople the proceedings of the council, and the deposition of Nesto- rius. Cyril sent away a secret message to the monks of Constantinople, announcing that Kestorius had been de- posed and excommunicated. The object of this was by stirring up those fanatics to influence the court. The weak-minded Theodosius II stood in great awe of the holi- ness of the monks. "His palace was so regulated that it differed little from a monastery." In 422 there died one of these who was noted for that kind of holiness that attaches to a monk, and Theodosius secured "his cassock of sack-cloth of hair, which, although it was excessively filthy, he wore as a cloak, hoping that thus he should become a partaker, in some degree, of the sanctity of the deceased." Socrates. And now, on receipt of Cyril's message, a certain Dalmatius, who was famous for his filthy sanctity, left his cell and put himself at the head of the whole herd of monks and archi- " 9 " Ecclesiastical History," book vii, chap. xxii. ALL ALIKE ORTHODOX. 495 mandrites in and about Constantinople. They marched solemnly through the streets, and everywhere as they passed, the populace burst into curses against Nestorius. They marched to the palace and lounged about the gates ; but the chief influence at court was yet favorable to Nes- torius, and their demonstrations had no immediate effect. By this time the reports of both parties had reached the court. Theodosius, after examining both accounts, approved both, and pronounced Nestorius, Cyril, and Memnon, all three deposed. As for their faith, he pro- nounced them "all three alike orthodox," but deposed them as a punishment which he said they all three alike deserved as being the chief authors of continual disturb- ances. The new imperial commissioner was sent down to Ephe- sus with the letter announcing the emperor's decision. As soon as he arrived, he summoned the bishops before him. Memnon refused to appear. Those who did come, however, had no sooner arrived than each party began to denounce the other. Cyril and his party pronounced the presence of Nestorius unendurable, and demanded that he be driven out. The party of Nestorius and John of Antioch, just as sternly demanded that Cyril should be expelled. As neither party could have its way, they began to fight. The imperial com- missioner had to command his soldiers to separate the pugil- istic bishops and stop the fight. When order had thus been enforced, the imperial letters were read. As soon as the sentence of deposition against Cyril and Memnon was read, the uproar began again, and another fight was prevented only by the arrest of the three chiefs. Nestorius and John of Antioch submitted without remonstrance ; but Cyril made a speech "in which he represented himself as the victim of persecution, incurred by apostolic innocence, and borne with apostolic resignation," and then yielded to the "inevitable necessity." Memnon was hunted up and also taken into 426 MART IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. custody. Cyril escaped, and with his body-guard of bath- men, women, and sailors, sailed away to Alexandria. The emperor next commanded that eight bishops of each party should appear in his presence at Constantinople. They were sent, but, on account of the desperate temper of the monks of Constantinople, it was counted unsafe for them to enter the city, and therefore they were stopped at Chalcedon, on the opposite side of the Bosphorus. There the emperor met them. The whole summer had been spent in these con- tentions of the council, and it was now September 4, when the emperor granted them the first audience. Four times the emperor had them appear before him, arid heard them fully. He appeared so decidedly to favor the party of Nesto- rius, that they thought the victory was already won. So cer- tain were they of this that they even sent off letters to their party at Ephesus, instructing them to send up a message of thanks to him for his kindness. But at the fifth meeting all their brilliant prospects were blasted. Cyril, from his post in Alexandria, had sent up thousands of pounds of gold, with instructions to Maximian, bishop of Constantinople, to add to it, not only the wealth of that church, but his utmost per- sonal effort to arouse ''the languid zeal of the princess Pulcheria in the cause of Cyril, to propitiate all the courtiers, and, if possible, to satisfy their rapacity." Milman. As avarice was one of the ruling passions of the eunuchs and women who ruled Theodosius II, "Every avenue of the throne was assaulted with gold. Under the decent names of eulogies and benedictions, the courtiers of both sexes were bribed according to the measure of their rapaciousness. But their incessant demands despoiled the sanctuaries of Con- stantinople and Alexandria ; and the authority of the patri- arch was unable to silence the just murmur of his clergy, that a debt of sixty thousand pounds had already been contracted to support the expense of this scandalous corruption." Gibbon. 31 30 "History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 64. 31 " Decline and Fall,'' chap, xlvii, par. 15. CYRIL BRIBES THE COURT AND WINS. 437 The efforts of Cyril were at last effective. The eunuch Scholasticus, one of the chief ministers of the emperor and the supporter of the cause of Nestorius at court, was bought ; and it was this that caused the sudden revolution in the em- peror's conduct toward the party of Nestorius. In the fifth and last audience that he gave the deputies, the emperor told them at once that they had better abandon Nestorius, and admit both Cyril and Memnon to their communion. They remonstrated, but he would listen to nothing. He put an end to the hearings, and returned the next day to Constanti- nople, taking with him the bishops of Cyril's party, regularly to ordain the successor of Nestorius in the bishopric of Con- stantinople. Shortly afterward an imperial edict was issued declaring Nestorius justly deposed, re-instating Cyril and Memnon in their respective sees, pronouncing all the other bishops alike orthodox, and giving them all leave to return to their homes. This dissolved the council. Even before the dissolution of the council the emperor had sent an order to Nestorius, commanding him to leave Ephesus and return to the monastery w r hence he had been called to the archbishopric of Constantinople. By the per- sistent efforts of Celestine, bishop of Rome, and others, the emperor was induced A. D. 436 to banish him and two of his friends a count of the empire and a presbyter of Constantinople to Petra in Arabia. July 30, in the same year, an imperial edict was issued, commanding all who be- lieved with Nestorius, to be called Simonians ; that all the books by Nestorius should be sought for and publicly burnt ; forbidding the Nestorians to hold any meetings anywhere, in city, in village, or in field ; and if any such meeting was held, then the place where it was held should be confiscated, as also the estates of all who should attend the meeting. Nestorius was not allowed to remain long at Petra. lie was taken from there to a place away in the desert between Egypt and Libya, and from there dragged about from place 428 MARY IS MADE THE MOTHER OF GOD. to place till he died of the hardships inflicted, at what date is not certainly known, but about A. D. 440. Such was the cause and such the conduct of the first Council of Ephesus, the third general council of the Catholic Church. And thus was established the Catholic doctrine that the Virgin Mary was the Mother of God. The controversy went on, however, nor did it ever logic- ally stop until December 8, A. D. 1854, when Pope Pius IX established the actual divinity of the Virgin Mary, by announcing the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, which reads as follows : "By the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ and of the blessed apos- tles Peter and Paul, as well as by our own, we declare, promulgate, and define that the doctrine which teaches that the most blessed Virgin Mary, at the very instant of her conception, was kept free from every stain of original sin solely by the grace and prerogative of the omnipotent God, in consideration of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of mankind, was revealed by God, and must on that account be believed firmly and continually by all the faithful ones." 32 32 "Encyclopedia Britannica," article " Immaculate Conception." The follow- ing is the original as there given: " Auctoritate Domini Nostri Jesu Christi, beatorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, ac Nostra, declaranras, pronuntiamus et de- flnimus, doctrinam, quse tenet Beatissimam Virginem Mariam in primo instant! suiB Conceptions fuisse singulari Omuipotentis Dei gratia et privilegio, intuitu meritorum Christi Jesu, Salvatoris humani generis, ab omni originalis culpae labe praeservatam immunem, esse a Deo revelatam, atque idcirco ab omnibus fidelibus firmiter constanterque credendam." CHAPTER XVIII. THE EUTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. IT having been decided that the Virgin Mary was the Mother of God, out of that decision there now arose an- other question involving the nature of Christ. That ques- tion was : How was the divine nature related to the human so that Mary could truly be called the Mother of God? That is, Did the divine nature become human ? or was the divine nature only joined to the human? In other words : Were there two natures in Christ ? or was there but one ? It was now A. D. 448, and the Eutychian controversy began. For a clear understanding of the case, it will be best formally to introduce the leading characters. Theodosius II was still emperor of the East ; Yalentinian III was emperor of the West. Eutyches was the abbot, or superior, of a monastery close to Constantinople. He had been the chief leader of the monks in the contest against Nestorius. "At his bidding the swarms of monks had thronged into the streets, defied the civil power, terrified the emperor, and contributed more than* any other cause, to the final overthrow of Nestorius. He had grown o!3 in the war against heresy." Milman. 1 Flavianus was now the occupant of the episcopal seat of Constantinople. Chrysaphius was another eunuch, who had risen to the place of chief minister of Theodosius II, and was also the godson of Eutyches. He was carrying on a court intrigue 1 " Jlistory of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iv, par. 22. [439] 430 THE ETTTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. to break the power of Pulcheria, by exalting the influence of Eudocia. He hoped also to place Eutyches on the epis- copal throne of Constantinople. The accession of Flavi- anus to that dignity had prevented this design for the time being, but he still held it in mind. When Flavianus was installed in the bishopric, Chrysaphins demanded that he should make to the emperor the offering of gold that was customary on such occasions. Instead of bringing gold, Flavianus brought only three loaves of consecrated bread. This, Chrysaphius so employed as to prejudice the emperor against the archbishop. Dioscorus was now archbishop of Alexandria. In this place it will be sufficient description of him simply to re- mark that he was a second Cyril, and leave it to the progress of the narrative to reveal him exactly as he was. Leo I, "the Great," w r as bishop of Kome, and regarded Dioscorus as "a prelate adorned with many virtues, and enriched with the gifts of the Holy Ghost.'' 1 Eusebius was bishop of Doryleum, to which office he had been appointed from a civil office in the household of Pulcheria. He also had been an early, ardent, and persistent adversary of Nestorius. This Eusebius now stood forth as the accuser of Eutyches. At a small synod which had been called for another pur- pose at Constantinople, November 8, A. D. 448, Eusebius presented a written complaint against Eutyches, and asked that it be read. The complaint was to the effect that Euty- ches had accused of Nestorianism orthodox teachers even Eusebius himself. To the complaint wa*s appended a de- mand that Eutyches should be summoned before the present synod to answer. As for Eusebius himself, he announced that he was ready to prove that Eutyches had "no right to the name of Catho- lic," and that he was "far from the true faith." Flavianus expressed surprise, and told Eusebius that he ought to go 2 Bower's " History of the Popes," Leo, par. 22, THE CONTROVERSY BEGINS. 431 to Eutyches, and, by a private interview, try to convince him of the true faith ; and if then he really showed himself to be a heretic, he would cite him before the synod. Euse- bius said he had been to him several times. Flavianus asked him to go again ; but he refused, and then the synod sent a priest and a deacon, as deputies to convey to Eutyches the accusations, and summon him to the synod which would meet again in four days. The synod met again, November 12, and Eusebius re- newed his complaint, with the addition that by conversations and discussions, Eutyches had misled many others. He then suggested that the synod should give expression to the true faith on the question that had been raised. Flavianus produced a letter which Cyril had written to Nestorius at the beginning of the controversy between them ; the act of the Council of Ephesus which approved this letter ; and an- other letter, which Cyril had written, about the close of that controversy. He required the bishops present to assent to the statements therein contained, as the expression of the true faith according to the Nicene Creed, which they had always believed and still believed, namely : "Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, is true God and true man, of a reasonable soul and a body subsisting, begotten of the Father before all time, without beginning, according to the Godhead, but in the last times, for us men and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, according to the manhood ; of one substance with the Father according to the Godhead, and of one substance with his mother, according to the manhood. We confess that Christ after the Incarnation consists of two natures in one hypostasis [personality] and in one person ; one Christ, one Son, one Lord. Whoever asserts otherwise, we exclude from the clergy and the church." 3 This they all signed, and then at the suggestion of Euse- bius it was sent to those who were absent for them to sign. The next session of the synod was held November 15, and the deputies who had been sent 10 Eutyches reported that he had refused to come, for the reason that when he became 3 Hefele's " History of the Church Councils," sec. 172, par. 3. 34 4:32 THE EUTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. a monk, he resolved never to leave the monastery to go to any place whatever. Besides, he told them that the synod ought to know that Eusebius had long been his enemy, and that it was only out of malice that he now accused him. He said he was ready to affirm and subscribe the declarations of the Councils of Nice and Ephesus. The synod summoned him again, and again he refused to come. Then Eusebius de- clared, "The guilty have ever ways of escaping ; Eutyches must now be brought here, even against his will." The synod then summoned him the third time. At the next meeting a messenger came from Eutyches, saying that he was sick. Flavianus told him the synod would wait until Eutyches got well, but that then he must come. At the next meeting, the deputies who had been sent with the third summons, reported that Eutyches had told them that he had sent his messenger to the archbishop and the synod that he might in his name give his assent to the declarations of the councils of Nice and Ephesus, "and to all that Cyril had uttered." At this Eusebius broke in with the declaration, "Even if Eutyches will now assent, because some have told him that he must yield to necessity and subscribe, yet / am not therefore in the wrong, for it is with reference, not to the future, but to the past, that I have accused him." ^ The deputies then closed with the informa- tion that he would come to the synod on the next Monday. At the appointed time, Eutyches came ; but he did not come alone. He came accompanied by a messenger of the emperor's privy council, and escorted by a great crowd com- posed of soldiers, and servants of the praetorian prefect, and "a rout of turbulent monks." The emperor's representa- tive bore a letter to the synod, in which the emperor said : "I wish the peace of the church and the maintenance of the orthodox faith, which was asserted by the Fathers at Nicsea and Ephesus ; and be- cause I know that the patrician Florentius is orthodox, and proved in * Id., par. 13. EUSEBIUS IN A DILEMMA. 433 the faith, therefore it is my will that he be present at the sessions of the synod, as the faith is in question." 5 At this the bishops cried out, ' ' Many years to the emperor, his faith is great! Many years to tJie pious, orthodox, high- priestly emperor.'''' Then the emperor's commissioner took his place, and Eusebius and Eutyches, the accuser and the accused, placed themselves in the midst. The first thing was to read the proceedings from the beginning up to this point, the vital part of which was the declarations to which they had demanded that Eutyches should give his assent. The reader read the Nicene Creed, and there was no dissent. He read the first of Cyril's letters, yet there was no dissent. He read the decision of the Council of Ephesus, and still there was no dissent. Then he began the second of Cyril's letters and read : "We confess our Lord Jesus Christ as perfect God and perfect man, and as of one substance with the Father according to the Godhead, and of one substance with us according to the manhood ; for a union of the two natures has taken place, therefore we confess one Christ, one Lord, and, in accordance witli this union without confusion, we call the holy Virgin God-bearer, because God the Logos was made flesh and man, and in the conception united the temple which he assumed from her with himself " 6 At this point Eusebius broke in. Seeing the reading was nearly finished with no sign of dissent, he was afraid that Eutyches would actually approve all the declarations, which doubtless he would have done. He therefore interrupted the reading, with the exclamation, "Certainly such is not confessed by this man here ; he has never believed this, but the contrary, and so he has taught every one who has come to him." Elorentius asked that Eutyches might be given a chance to say for himself "whether he agreed with what had been read." To this Eusebins vehemently objected, for the reason, said he, " If Eatyches agrees to it, then I must ap- pear as having been, lightly a slanderer, and shall LOSE M\ OFFICE "/ / * Id. par. 21. "A/., par. :>2. THE EUTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. Florentius renewed his request that Eutyches might be allowed to answer ; but Eusebius strenuously objected. And he only consented at the last, on the express condition that no prejudice should lodge against him, even though Eutyches should confess all that was required. Elavianus confirmed this condition, with the assurance that not the slightest disadvantage should come to Eusebius. But even then Eutyches was not allowed to answer in his own way, because the predicament in which Eusebius had found him- self, involved in a measure the whole synod also, as they had given full credit to the charges of Eusebius, and had refused all the assurances of Eutyches that he agreed to all the documents which they had cited. Flavianus and Euse- bius, therefore, in order to save themselves from defeat and perhaps deposition, if the matter should come to a general council, determined if possible to entrap Eutyches in some statement which they could condemn. The proceedings then were as follows : Flavianus. '"Say now, dost thou acknowledge the union of two natures ? " Eutyches. "I believe that Christ is perfect God and perfect man, but here I stop, and advise you to do so too." Eusebius. "Dost thou confess the existence of two natures, even after the incarnation, and that Christ is of one nature w r ith us after the flesh, or not ? " Eutyclies. "I have not come to dispute, but to testify to your Holiness what I think. My view, however, is set down in this writing ; command, therefore, that it be read." Flamamts. " If it is thine own confession of faith, why shouldst thou need the paper ? " Eutyches. "That is my belief: I pray to the Father with the Son, and to the Son with the Father, and to the Holy Ghost with the Father and Son. I confess that his bodily presence is from the body of the holy Virgin, and that he became perfect man for our salvation. This I con- FORECAST OF THE INQUISITION. 435 fess before the Father, before the Son, and before the Holy Ghost, and before your holiness." Flavianm. "Dost thou confess also that the one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, is of one substance with the Father as to his Godhead, and of one substance with his mother as to his manhood ? " Eutyches. "I have already declared my opinion ; leave me now in peace." Flavian-its. "Dost thou confess that Christ consists of two natures ? " Eutyches. "I have not hitherto presumed to dispute concerning the nature of my God ; but that he is of one substance with us, have I hitherto, as I affirm, never said. Up to this present day have I never said that the body of our Lord and God is of one substance with us. I do con- fess, however, that the holy Virgin is of one substance with us, and that our God is made of our flesh." Fla/uianus, Florentine, and Basil of Seleucia. "If thou dost acknowledge that Mary is of one substance with us, and that Christ has taken his manhood from her, then it follows of itself that he, according to his manhood, is also of one substance with us." Eutyches. "Consider well, I say not that the body of man has become the body of God, but I speak of a human body of God, and say that the Lord was made flesh of the Yirgin. If you wish me to add further that his body is of one substance with ours, then I do this ; but I do not under- stand this as though I denied that he is the Son of God. Formerly I did not generally speak of a unity of sub- stance, but now I will do so, because your Holiness thus requires it." Fla/oianus. "Thou. doest it then only of compulsion, and not because it is thy faith ? " Eutyches. "I have not hitherto so spoken, but will do so now in accordance with the will of the synod." 436 THE EUTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. Florentine. -- " Dost thou believe that our Lord, who was born of the Virgin, is of one substance with us, and that after the incarnation he is of two natures, or not ? " Eutyches. "I confess that before the union he was of two natures, but after the union I confess only one nature." At this "the whole council was in an uproar, and noth- ing was heard but anathemas and curses, each bishop there present striving to distinguish himself above the rest, by being the foremost in uttering the most bitter and severe his zeal could suggest."- Ilower. 1 When the noise had ceased, Flaviamis, in the name of the synod, demanded of Eutyches a public declaration of his faith in, and a curse upon every view that did not accept, the doctrines which had been set forth by the synod. Eutyches. "I will now indeed, since the synod so re- quires, accept the manner of speech in question ; but I find it neither in Holy Scripture nor in the Fathers collectively, and therefore cannot pronounce a curse upon the non-accept- ance of the question, because that would be cursing the Fathers." All together (springing to their feet}. "Let him be ac- cursed ! " Flamanus. " What does this man deserve who does not confess the right faith, but persists in his perverseness ? " Eutyches. "I will now indeed accept the required man- ner of speaking in accordance with the will of the synod, but cannot pronounce the curse." Florentine. "Dost thou confess two natures in Christ, and his unity of substance with us ? " Eutyches. "I read the writings of St. Cyril and St. Athanasius : before the union they speak of two natures, but after the union only of one." Florentius. " Dost thou confess two natures even after the union? If not, then wilt thou be condemned." 7 " History of the Popes," Leo, par. 24. A GENERAL COUNCIL 18 DEMANDED. 43? Eutyche*. "Let the writings of Cyril and Athanasius be read." Basil of Seleutia. "If thou dost not acknowledge two natures after the union also, then thou acceptest a mingling and confusion." Florentines. "He who does not say ^ of two natures^ and who does not acknowledge two natures, has not the right faith." All together. "And he who accepts anything only by compulsion does not believe in it. Long live the em- perors ! " Flavianus, announcing the sentence. " Eutyches, a priest and archimandrite, has, by previous statements, and even now by his own confessions, shown himself to be en- tangled in the perversity of Valentinus and Apollinaris, without allowing himself to be won back to the genuine dogmas by our exhortation and instruction ; therefore we, bewailing his complete perversity, have decreed, for the sake of Christ whom he has reviled, that he be deposed from every priestly office, expelled from our communion, and deprived of his headship over the convent. And all who henceforth hold communion with him, and have re- course to him, must know that they too are liable to the penalty of excommunication." 8 The sentence was subscribed by all the synod, about thirty in number, and the synod was dissolved, November 22, A. D. 448. It is not necessary to follow the particulars any farther ; as in every other controversy, the dispute speedily spread far and wide. The decree of the synod was sent by Flavianus to all the other bishops for their indorsement. As soon as the action of the synod had been announced, Dioscorus, 8 Hefele's "History of the Church Councils," sec. 172, par. 22-24; and Bow- er's "History of the Popes," Leo, par. 46. 438 THE EUTYCHIAN CONTROVERSY. with all his powers, espoused the cause of Eutyches. Through Chrysaphius the Eunuch, Eutyches was already powerful at court, and added to this the disfavor in which Flavianus was already held by the emperor, the war as- sumed powerful proportions at the start. The next step was, of course, for both parties to appeal to the bishop of Rome. Eutyches felt perfectly safe in appeal- ing to Leo, because he had the words of Julius, bishop of Home, saying, "It must not be said that there are two natures in Christ after their union ; for as the body and soul form but one nature in man, so the divinity and humanity form but one nature in Christ." This being precisely the view of Eutyches, he felt perfectly confident in his appeal to Leo, for he could not suppose that Leo would contradict Julius. He shortly foujid that such a hope was altogether vain. The emperor also wrote to the bishop of Rome. It seems that Leo did not make any answer to Eutyches direct. To Flavianus he sent a request for a fuller account of the whole matter, and that it should be sent by an envoy. To the emperor he wrote rejoicing that Theodosius "has not only the heart of an emperor, but also that of a priest, and is rightly anxious that no discord should arise ; for then is the empire best established when the holy Trinity is served in unity." 10 Dioscorus seeing now a chance of humbling the arch- bishop of Constantinople, joined Eutyches in a request to the emperor to call a general council. Chrysaphius, seeing again a prospect of accomplishing his favorite project to make Eutyches archbishop of Constantinople, strongly sup- ported this request. But Theodosius, after his experience with the council at Ephesus, dreaded to have anything to do with another one, and sought to ward off another calamity 9 Bower, Id., par. 25. 10 Hefele's "History of the Church Councils," sec. 173, par. 10. THE SECOND GENERAL COUNCIL OF EPHESUS. 439 of the kind. But there was no remedy ; the tiling had to come. Accordingly, March 30, A. D. 449, a message in the name of the two emperors, Theodosius II and Valentinian III, was issued, announcing that "as doubts arid controversies have arisen respecting the right faith, the holding of an oacumenical synod has become necessary." Therefore the archbishops, metropolitans, and "other holy bishops dis- tinguished for knowledge and character," should assemble at Ephesus August 1 . A special edict was sent to Dioscorus, saying : - "The emperor has already forbidden Theodoret of Cyrus, on account of his writings against Cyril, to take part in the synod, unless he is ex- pressly summoned by the synod itself. Because, however, it is to be feared that some Nestorianizing bishops will use every means in order to bring him with them, the emperor, following the rule of the holy Fathers, will nominate Dioscorus to be president of the synod. Arch- bishop Juvenal of Jerusalem and Thalassius of Csesarea, and all zealous friends of the orthodox faith, will support Dioscorus. In conclusion, the emperor expresses the wish that all who shall desire to add anything to the Nicene confession of faith, or take anything from it, snail not be regarded in the synod ; but on this point Dioscorus shall give judgment, since it is for this very purpose that the synod is convoked." Leo was specially invited ; and a certain Barsumas, a priest and superior of a monastery in Syria, was called as the representative of the monks, and Dioscorus was directed to receive him as such, and give him a seat in the council. Not willing to wait for the decision of the question by the coming general council, Leo took occasion to assert his authority over all ; and June 13 sent a letter to Flavianus, in which he indorsed the action of the Synod of Constanti- nople as far as it went, but reproved the synod for treating the matter so mildly as it had done, and himself took the strongest ground against Eutyches. In answer to the re- quest of the emperor that he should attend the general 440 THE EUTTCHIAN CONTROVERSY. council, Leo declined to attend in person, but promised to be present by Legates a Latere. The council, composed of one hundred and forty-nine members, met in the Church of the Virgin Mary at Ephesus, and was formally opened August 8, A. D. 449. Dioscorus, the president, was seated upon a high throne. Two imperial commissioners, Elpidius and Eulogius, were in attendance with a strong body of troops to keep order in the council, and preserve peace in the city. The council was opened with the announcement by the secretary, that " the God- fearing emperors have from zeal for religion, convoked this assembly." Then the imperial message calling the council was read, and next the two legates of the bishop of Rome announced that though invited by the emperor, Leo did not appear in person, but had sent a letter. Next Elpidius, the imperial commissioner, made a short speech, in which he said : "The Logos has on this day permitted the assembled bishops to give judgment upon him. If you confess him rightly, then he also will con- fess you before his heavenly Father. But those who shall prevent the true doctrine will have to undergo a severe two-fold judgment, that of God and that of the emperor." 12 Next was read the emperor's instructions to the two im- perial commissioners, which ran as follows : - "But lately the holy Synod of Ephesus has been engaged with the affairs of the impious Nestorius, and has pronounced a righteous sentence on him. Because, however, new controversies of faith have arisen, we have summoned a second synod to Ephesus, in order to destroy the evil to the roots. We have therefore selected Elpidius and Eulogius for the serv- ice of the faith in order to fulfill our commands in reference to the Synod of Ephesus. In particular, they must allow no disturbances, and they must arrest every one who arouses such, and inform the emperor of him ; they must take care that everything is done in order, must be present at the decisions, and take care that the synod examine the matter quickly and carefully, and give information of the same to the emperor. Those 12 Id., sec. 178, par. 5. EUTTCHES IS DECLARED ORTHODOX. 44! bishops who previously sat in judgment on Eutyches( at Constantinople ) are to be present at the proceedings at Ephesus, but are not to vote, since their own previous sentence must be examined anew. Further, no other question is to be brought forward at the synod, and especially no question of money, before the settlement of the question of faith. By a letter to the proconsul, we have required support for the com- missioners from the civil and military authorities, so that they may be able to fulfill our commissions, which are as far above other business as divine above human things." 13 Following this was read a letter from the emperor to the council itself, in which he said : "The emperor has adjudged it necessary to call this assembly of bishops, that they might cut off this controversy and all its diabolical roots, exclude the adherents of Nestorius from the church, and pre- serve the orthodox faith firm and unshaken ; since the whole hope of the emperor and the power of the*empire, depend on the right faith in God and the holy prayers of the synod." u The council was now formally opened, and according to the instructions of the emperor they proceeded first to consider the faith. But upon this a dispute at once arose as to what was meant by the faith. Some insisted that this meant that the council should first declare its faith ; but Dioscorus inter- preted it to mean not that the faith should first be declared, for this the former council had already done, but rather that they were to consider which of the parties agreed with what the true faith explains. And then he cried out :, " Or will you alter the faith of the holy Fathers f " In answer to this there were cries, ' ' Accursed he he wlio makes alterations in it / ac- cursed he he who ventures to discuss the faith.' 1 '' Next Dioscorus took a turn by which he covertly an- nounced what was expected of the council. He said : "At Nica^a and at Ephesus the true faith has already been pro- claimed ; but although there have been two synods, the faith is but one." In response to this there were loud shouts from the assembly, "No one dare add anything or take any- 13 Id., sec. 175, par. 3. " Id., par. 6. 442 THE EUTTCIIIAN CONTROVERSY. tldng away. A great guardian of the faith is Dioscorus. Accursed l>e he who still discusses the faith y the Holy Ghost speaks by Dioscorus. " 15 Eutyches was now introduced to the council, that he might explain his faith. He first commended himself to the holy Trinity, and censured the Synod of Constantinople. He then handed to the secretary a written confession, in which he repeated the Nicene Creed, indorsed the acts of the Coun- cil of Ephesus and the doctrine of the Holy Father Cyril, and cursed all heretics from Nestorius clear -back to Simon Magus, who had been rebuked by the apostle Peter. He then gave an account of the proceedings against himself. When this had been read, Flavianus demanded that Eu- sebius should be heard ; but the imperial commissioners stopped him with the statement that they were not called together to judge Eutyches anew, but to judge those who had judged him, and that therefore the only legitimate business of the council was to examine the acts of the Synod of Constantinople. Accordingly the proceedings of that synod were taken up. All went smoothly enough until the reader came to the point where the synod had demanded of Eutyches that he should acknowledge two natures in Christ after the incarna- tion. When this was read, there was an uproar against it in the council, as there had been against the statement of Eutyches in the synod ; only the uproar here w T as as much greater than there, as the council was greater than the synod. The council cried with one voice, ''Away with Eusebius ! banish Eusebius ! let him be burned alive ! As lie cuts asunder the two natures in Christ, so be he cut asunder / " 16 Dioscorus asked: "Is the doctrine that there are two natures after the incarnation to be tolerated ? " Aloud the 15 Id., sec. 178, par. 6, 7. 16 Milman's "History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iv, par. 30. THE UNITY OF THE COUNCIL. 443 council replied : ' ' Accursed l)e lie who says so. " Again Dioscorus cried: " I have your voices, I must have your hands. He that cannot cry loud enough to be heard, let him lift up his hands." Then with uplifted hands the coun- cil unanimously bellowed : " Whoever admits the two natures, let him he accursed; let him he driven oxt, torn in pieces, massacred.'''' 1 '' Eutyches was then unanimously pronounced orthodox and declared restored to the communion of the church, to the government of his monastery, and to all his former privileges ; and he was exalted as a hero for " his courage in daring to teach, and his firmness in daring to defend, che true and genuine doctrine of the Fathers. And on this occasion, those distinguished themselves the most by their panegyrics, who had most distinguished themselves by their invectives before." -Sower. 1 * Dioscorus having everything in his own power, now de- termined to visit vengeance upon the archbishop of Con- stantinople. Under pretense that it was for the instruction of his colleagues, he directed that the acts of the previous Council of Ephesus concerning the Nicene Creed, etc., should be read. As soon as the reading was finished, he said : " You have now heard that the first Synod of Ephesus threatens every one who teaches otherwise than the Nicene Creed, or makes alterations in it, and raises new or further questions. Every one must now give his opinion in writing as to whether those who, in their theological inquiries, go beyond the Nicene Creed, are to be punished or not." 19 This was aimed directly at Flavianus and Eusebms of Doryleeum, as they had expressed the wish that the expres- sion "two natures" might be inserted in the Nicene Creed. To the statement of Dioscorus, several bishops responded at once : "Whoever goes beyond the Nicene Creed is not to 17 Bower's " History of the Popes," Leo, par. 81. is ld. "Hefele's "History of the Church Councils," sec. 178, par. 15. 4:4:4: THE EUTYCIIIAN CONTROVERSY. be received as a Catholic.*' Then Dioscorus continued: "As then the first Synod of Ephesus threatens every one who alters anything in the Nicene faith, it follows that Fla- vianus of Constantinople and Eusebius of Dorylaeum must be deposed from their ecclesiastical dignity. I pronounce, therefore, their deposition, and every one of those present shall communicate his view of this matter. Moreover every- thing will be brought to the knowledge of the emperor." Flavianus replied: " / except against you," and, to take time by the forelock, placed a written appeal in the hands of the legates of Leo. Several of the friends of Flavianus left their seats, and prostrating themselves before the throne of Dioscorus, begged him not to inflict such a sentence, and above all that he would not ask them to sign it. He replied, ' ' Though my tongue were to be cut out, I would not alter a single syllable of it" Trembling for their own fate if they should refuse to subscribe, the pleading bishops now em- braced his knees, and entreated him to spare them ; but he angrily exclaimed : " What! do you think to raise a tumult f Where are the counts f " At this the counts ordered the doors to be thrown open, and the proconsul of Asia entered with a strong body of armed troops, followed by a confused multitude of furious monks, armed with chains, and clubs, and stones. Then there was a general scramble of the "holy bishops " to find a refuge. Some took shelter behind the throne of Dioscorus, others crawled under the benches all concealed themselves as best they could. Dioscorus declared : " The sentence must he signed. If any one objects to it, let him take care / for it is with me he has to deal." The bishops, when they found that they were not to be massacred at once, crept out from under the benches and from other places of concealment, and returned trembling to their seats. Then Dioscorus took a blank paper, and accompanied by the bishop of Jerusalem, and attended by an armed guard, PEACE JS DECLARED RESTORED. 445 passed through the assembly and had each bishop in succes- sion to sign it. All signed but the legates of the bishop of Rome. Then the blank was tilled up by Dioscorus with a charge of heresy against Flavianus, and with the sentence which he had just pronounced upon Flavianus and Eusebius. When the sentence was written, Flavianus again said : " I ex- cept against you; " upon which Dioscorus with some other bishops rushed upon him, and with Barsumas crying out, " Strike him ! strike Mm dead /" they beat him and banged him about, and then threw him down and kicked him and tramped upon him until he was nearly dead ; then sent him off immediately to prison, and the next morning ordered him into exile. At the end of the second day's journey he died of the ill usage he had received in the council. 20 All these proceedings, up to the murder of Flavianus, were carried out on the first day. The council continued three days longer, during which Dioscorus secured the con- demnation and deposition of Domnus of Antioch, and several other principal bishops, although they had signed his blank paper, for having formerly opposed Cyril and Eutyches. He then put an end to the council, and returned to Alexandria. The emperor Theodosius, whom Leo had praised as hav- ing the heart of a priest, issued an edict in which he approved and confirmed the decrees of the council, and commanded that all the bishops of the empire should immediately sub- scribe to the Nicene Creed. He involved in the heresy of Nestorius, all who were opposed to Eutyches, and com- manded that no adherent of Nestorius or Flavianus should ever be raised to a bishopric. " By the same edict, persons of all ranks and conditions were forbidden, on pain of per- petual banishment, to harbor or conceal any who taught, held, or favored, the tenets of Nestorius, Flavianus, and the 20 Bower's " History of the Popes," Leo, par. 32 ; Milman's " History of Latin Christianity," 1 book ii, chap, iv, par. 30 ; and Hefele's "History of the Church Councils," sec. 178, par. 16, and sec. 179. 35 446 THE EUTYCIHAN CONTROVERSY. deposed bishops ; and the books, comments, homilies, and other works, written by them or passing under their names, were ordered to be publicly burnt." 21 He then wrote to Val- entinian III, that by the deposition of the turbulent prelate Flavianus, ''peace had in the end been happily restored to all the churches in his dominions." As the doctrine which the council had established was contrary to that which Leo had published in his letter, he denounced the council as a "synod of robbers," refused to recognize it at all, and called for another general council. But in every respect this council was just as legitimate and as orthodox as any other one that had been held from the Council of Nice to that day. It was regularly called ; it was regularly opened ; the proceedings were all perfectly regular; and when it was over, the proceedings were regularly ap- proved and confirmed by the imperial authority. In short, there is no element lacking to make the second Council of Ephesus as thoroughly regular and orthodox as the first Council of Ephesus, which is held by the Church of Rome to be entirely orthodox, or even as orthodox as the Council of Nice itself. 21 Bovver, Id., par. 34. CHAPTER XIX. THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. IEO persisted in his refusal to recognize the validity of .> the acts of the second Council of Ephesus, and insisted that another general council should be called. As it was the will of Leo alone that made, or could now make, the late council anything else than strictly regular and orthodox according to the Catholic system of discipline and doctrine, it is evident that if another general council was called, it would have to be subject to the will of Leo, and its decision upon questions of the faith would be but the expression of the will of Leo. This is precisely what Leo aimed at, and nothing less than this would satisfy him. Leo had now been bishop of Rome eleven years. He was a full-blooded Roman in all that that term implies. "All that survived of Rome, of her unbounded ambition, her inflexible perseverance, her dignity in defeat, her haugh- tiness of language, her belief in her own eternity, and in her indefeasible title to universal dominion, her respect for traditionary and written law, and of unchangeable cus- tom, might seem concentrated in him alone." Hfilman. 1 Yet Leo was not the first one in whom this spirit was manifested. His aspirations were but the culmination of the arrogance of the bishopric of Rome which had been constantly growing. To trace the subtle, silent, often vio- lent, yet always constant, growth of this spirit of supremacy and encroachment of absolute authority, is one of the most curious studies in all history ; though it cannot be followed 1 " History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iv, par. 2. [447] 448 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. in detail in this book. Not only was there never an oppor- tunity lost, but opportunities were created, for the bishop of Rome to assert authority and to magnify his power. Su- premacy in discipline and in jurisdiction was asserted by Victor and Stephen ; but it was not until the union of Church and State that the field was fully opened to the arro- gance of the bishopric of Rome. A glance at the successive bishops from the union of Church and State to the accession of Leo, will give a better understanding of the position and pretensions of Leo than could be obtained in any other way. MELCHIADES was bishop of Rome from July 2, A. D. 311, to December, 314, and therefore, as already related, was in the papal chair when the union of Churdh and State was formed, and took a leading part- in that evil intrigue. And soon the bishopric of Rome began to receive its reward in imperial favors. "The bishop of Rome sits by the imperial author- ity at the head of a synod of Italian bishops, to judge the disputes of the African Donatists." MUman* Melchiades was succeeded by SYLVESTER, A. D. 314-336. In the very year of his accession, the Council of Aries bestowed upon the bishopric of Rome the distinction and the office of notifying all the churches of the proper time to celebrate Easter. And in 325 the general Council of Nice recognized the bishop of Rome the first bishop of the empire. Under him the organization of the church was formed upon the model of the organization of the State. He was suc- ceeded by MAKE, A. D. 336, whose term continued only from January till October, and was therefore so short that nothing occurred worthy of rec- ord in this connection. He was succeeded by 8 .W., book i, chap, ii, par. 1. PRETENSIONS OF THE BISHOPS OF ROME. 449 JULIUS, OCTOBER 336-352, under whom the Council of Sardica 347 made the bishop of Rome the source of appeal, upon which "single precedent " the bishopric of Rome built " a universal right." ScJiajf* Julius was succeeded by LIBEKIUS, 352-366, who excommunicated Athanasius and then approved his doctrine, and carried on the contest with Constantius, in which he incurred banishment for the Catholic faith ; and then became Arian, then Serni-Arian, and then Catholic again. He was succeeded by DAMASUS, 366-384. In his episcopate, Yalentinian I enacted a law making the bishop of Rome the judge of other bishops. A council in Rome, A. D. 378, enlarged his powers of judging, and peti- tioned the emperor Gratian to exempt the bishop of Rome from all civil jurisdiction except that of the emperor alone ; to order that he be judged by none except a council, or the emperor direct ; and that the imperial power should be ex- erted to compel obedience to the judgment of the bishop of Rome concerning other bishops. Gratian granted part of their request, and it was made to count for all. Damasus was succeeded by SIEICIUS, 384-389, who issued the first decretal. A decretal is "an answer sent by the pope to applications to him as head of the church, for guidance in cases involving points of doctrine or discipline." The directions of Siricius in this decretal were to be strictly observed under penalty of excommuni- cation. It was dated February 11, A. D. 385. He convened a council in Rome, which decreed that "no one should pre- sume to ordain a bishop without the knowledge of the apostolic see." -Bower.* He was succeeded by 3 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, \ 62, par. 6. * " History of the Popes," Siricius, par. 21. 450 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. ANASTASIUS i, 389-402, who, though very zealous to maintain all that his predecessors had asserted or claimed, added nothing in particular himself. He condemned as a heretic, Origen, who had been dead one hundred and fifty years, and who is now a Catholic saint. He was succeeded by INNOCENT i, 402 4:17. Innocent was an indefatigable disciplinarian, and kept up a constant correspondence with all the West, as we'll as with the principal bishoprics of the East, establishing rules, dic- tating to councils, and issuing decretals upon all the affairs of the church. Hitherto the dignity of the bishopric of Borne had been derived from the dignity of the city of Rome. In- nocent now asserted that the superior dignity of the bishop- ric of Rome was derived from Peter, whom he designated the Prince of the Apostles ; and that in this respect it took precedence of that of Antioch because that in Rome Peter had accomplished what he had only begun in Antioch.* He demanded the absolute obedience of all churches in the West, because, as he declared, Peter was the only apostle that ever preached in the West ; and that all the churches in the West had been founded by Peter, or by some successor of his. This was all a lie, and he knew it, but that made no difference to him ; he unblushingly asserted it, and then, upon that, asserted that "all ecclesiastical matters through- out the world are, by divine right, to be referred to the apostolic see, before they are finally decided in the prov- inces." Sower. 5 At the invasion of Alaric and his siege of Rome, Innocent headed an embassy to the emperor Honorius to mediate for a treaty of peace between Alaric and the emperor. "Upon the mind of Innocent appears first distinctly to have dawned the vast conception of Rome's universal ecclesiastical supremacy, dim as yet, and shadowy, 5 /d., "Innocent," par. 8 from the end. "IRREVOCABLE" AND "UNIVERSAL." 4.", 1 yet full and comprehensive in its outline." - Milman* He was succeeded by ZOSIMUS, MARCH 18, A. D. 417 DEC. 26, 418, who asserted with all the arrogance of Innocent, all that In- nocent had claimed. He not only boasted with Innocent that to him belonged the power to judge all causes, but that the judgment "is irrevocable ; " and accordingly established the use of the dictatorial expression, "For so it has pleased the apostolic see," as sufficient authority for all things that he might choose to command. And upon this assumption, those canons of the Council of Sardica which made the bishop of Rome the source of appeal, he passed off upon the bishops of Africa as. the canons of the Council of Nice, in which he was actually followed by Leo, and put tradition upon a level with the Scriptures. He was succeeded by BONIFACE i, 419-422, who added nothing to the power or authority of the bishopric of Rome, but diligently and " conscientiously " maintained all that his predecessors had asserted, in behalf of what he called "the just rights of the see," 1 in which he had been placed. He was succeeded by CELESTINE i, 422-432, who in a letter written A. D. 438, plainly declared : ' ' As I am appointed by God to watch over his church, it is incum- bent upon me everywhere to root out evil practices, and in- troduce good ones in their room, for my pastoral vigilance is'restrained by no bounds, but extends to all places where Christ is known and adored." -Sower. 1 It was he who appointed the terrible Cyril his vicegerent to condemn Nes- torius, and to establish the doctrine that Mary was the Mother of God. He was succeeded by 6 " History of Latiu Christianity," book ii, chap, i, par. 8. 7 " History of the Popes," Celestine, par. 15. 452 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. SIXTUS in, 432-440, who, as others before, added nothing specially to the papal claims, yet yielded not an iota of the claims already made. He was succeeded by LEO i, "THE GREAT," A. D. 440-461. Such was the heritage bequeathed to Leo by his prede- cessors, and the arrogance of his own native disposition, with the grand opportunities which offered during his long rule, added to it a thousandfold. At the very moment of his election he was absent in Gaul on a mission as media- tor to reconcile a dispute between two of the principal men of the empire. He succeeded in his mission, and was hailed as "the Angel of Peace," and the "Deliverer of the Em- pire." In a sermon, he showed what his ambition em- braced. He portrayed the powers and glories of the former Rome as they were reproduced in Catholic Rome. The conquests and universal sway of Heathen Rome were but the promise of the conquests and universal sway of Catholic Rome. Romulus and Remus were but the precursors of Peter and Paul. Rome of former days had by her armies conquered the earth and sea : now again, by the see of the holy blessed Peter as head of the world, Rome through her divine religion would dominate the earth. 8 In A. D. 445, "at the avowed instance of Leo" and at the dictation, if not in the actual writing, of Leo, Valen- tinian III issued a "perpetual edict" "commanding all bishops to pay an entire obedience and submission to the orders of the apostolic see ;" "to observe, as law, whatever it should please the bishop of Rome to command ;" "that the bishop of Rome had a right to command what he pleased ;" and "whoever refused to obey the citation of the Roman pontiff should be compelled to do so by the mod- 8 Milman, ' History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iv, par. 2. LEO DEMANDS ANOTHER COUNCIL. 453 erator of the province" in which the recalcitrant bishop might dwell. 9 This made his authority absolute over all the West, and now he determined to extend it over the East, and so make it universal. As soon as he learned the decision of the Council of Ephesus, he called a council in Rome, and by it rejected all that had been done by the council at Ephesus, and wrote to the emperor, Theodosius II, "entreating him in the name of the holy Trinity, to declare null what had been done there," and set everything back as it was before that council was called, and so let the matter remain until a general council could be held in Italy. Leo addressed not the emperor Theodosius alone, to have another council called. He wrote to Pulcheria, appointing her a legate of St. Peter, and entreated her " to employ all her interest with the emperor to obtain the assembling of an oecumenical council, and all her authority to prevent the evils that would be otherwise occasioned by the war which had been lately declared against the faith of the church. "- Bower. 10 In February 450, the emperor Yalentinian III, with his mother Placidia and his wife Eudocia, who was the daughter of Theodosius II, made a visit to Rome. The next day after their arrival, they went to the Church of St. Peter, where they were received by Leo, who, as soon as he met them, put on all the agony he could, and with sobs, and tears, and sighs, he addressed them ; but on account of his great excess of grief, his words were so mumbled that noth- ing could be made of them. Presently the two women began to cry. This somewhat relieved the stress upon Leo, so that with much eloquence, he represented the great danger that threatened the church. Then he mustered up his tears again, and mixed them with '/who receive it in faith ; as, however, those who would do away with the preaching of the truth devised vain expressions through their own heresies, and, on the one side, dared to destroy the mystery of the incarnation of our Lord and rejected the designation of God-bearer, and, on the other side, introduced a mixt- ure and confusion [of the natures], and, contrary to reason, imagined only one nature of the flesh and of the Godhead, and rashly maintained that the divine nature of the Only-begotten was, by the mixture, become passible, therefore the holy, great, and (Ecumenical Synod decrees that the faith of the three hundred and eighteen Fathers shall remain invio- late, and that the doctrine afterwards promulgated by the one hundred and fifty Fathers at Constantinople, on account of the Pneumatomachi shall have equal validity, being put forth by them, not in order to add to the creed of Nica3a anything that was lacking, but in order to make known in writing their consciousness concerning the Holy Ghost against the deniers of his glory. " On account of those, however, who endeavored to destroy the mys- tery of the incarnation, and who boldly insulted him who was born of the holy Mary, affirmed that he was a mere man, the holy synod has ac- 472 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. cepted as valid the synodal letter of St. Cyril to Nestorius and to the ori- entals in opposition to Nestorianism, and has added to them the letter of the holy archbishop Leo of Rome, written to Flavian for the overthrow of the Eutychian errors, as agreeing with the doctrine of St. Peter and as a pillar against all heretics, for tlie confirmation of the orthodox dogmas. The synod opposes those who seek to rend the mystery of the incarna- tion into a duality of sons, and excludes from holy communion those who venture to declare the Godhead of the Only-begotten as capable of suffer- ing, and opposes those who imagine a mingling and a confusion of the two natures of Christ, and drives away those who foolishly maintain that the servant-form of the Son, assumed from us, is from a heavenly substance, or any other [than ours], and anathematizes those who fable that before the union there were two natures of our Lord, but after the union only one." Having thus paved the way, they presented for the pres- ent occasion, for all people, and for all time, the following creed : "Following, accordingly, the holy Fathers, we confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, and we all with one voice declare him to be at the same time perfect in Godhead, and perfect in manhood, very God, and at the same time very man, consisting of a reasonable soul and a body, being t:onsubstantial with the Father as respects his Godhead, and at the same time consubstantial with ourselves as respects his manhood ; resembling us in all things, independently of sin ; begotten before the ages, of the Father, according to his Godhead, but born, in the last of the days, of Mary, the virgin and Mother of God, for our sakes and for our salvati on ; being one and the same Jesus Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, made known in two natures without confusion, with- out conversion, without severance, vrithyut separation inasmuch as the dif- ference of the natures is in no way annulled by their union, but the peculiar essence of each nature is rather preserved, and conspires in one person and in one subsistence, not as though he were parted or severed into two persons, but is one and the same Son, Only-begotten, Divine Word, Lord Jesus Christ, as the prophets declared concerning him, and Christ himself has fully instructed us, and the symbol of the Fathers has conveyed to us. Since, then, these matters have been defined by us with all accuracy and diligence, the holy and universal synod has determined that no one shall be at liberty to put forth another faith, whether in writing, or by framing, or devising, or teaching it to others. And that those who shall presume to frame, or publish, or teach another faith, or ROYALTY RATIFIES THE CREED. 473 to communicate another symbol to those who are disposed to turn to the knowledge of the truth from heathenism, or Judaism, or any other sect that they, if they be bishops or clerks, shall suffer deprivation, the bishops of their episcopal, the clerks of their clerical, office ; and if monks or laics, shall be anathematized." 22 When the reading of this report of the commission was finished, the council adjourned. THE SIXTH SESSION, OCTOBER 25. At this session the emperoi Marcian and the empress Pulcheria, came with their whole court to ratify the decision which the council in the previous session had reached con- cerning the faith. Marcian opened the session in a speech, spoken first in Latin and repeated in Greek, which was as follows : "From the beginning of our reign we have had the purity of the faith peculiarly at heart. As now, through the avarice or perversity of some, many have been seduced to error, we summoned the present synod so that all error and all obscurity might be.dispelled, that religion might shine forth from the power of its light, and that no one should in future venture further to maintain concerning the incarnation of our Lord and Saviour, anything else than that which the apostolic preaching and the decree, in accordance therewith, of the three hundred and eighteen holy Fathers have handed down to posterity, and which is also testified by the letter of the holy Pope Leo of Rome to Flavian. In order to strengthen the faith, but not at all to exercise violence, we have wished, after the ex- ample of Constantine, to be personally present at the synod, so that the nations may not be still more widely separated by false opinions. Our efforts were directed to this, that all, becoming one in the true doctrine, may return to the same religion, and honor the true Catholic faith. May God grant this." As soon as he had finished the speech in Latin, The bishops unanimously exclaimed. "Many years to the emperor, many years to the empress ; he is the only son of Constantine. Prosperity to Marcian, the new Constantine ! " After he had repeated the speech in Greek, the bishops repeated their shouts of adulation. Then the whole declara- 22 Evagrius's "Ecclesiastical History," book ii, chap, iv, par. 4. THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. tion, preamble and all, concerning the faith, was read, at the close of which The Emperor Marcian. "Does this formula of the faith express the view of all ? " I?ie six hundred Mshops all shouting at once. "We all believe thus ; there is one faith, one will ; we are all unani- mous, and have unanimously subscribed ; we are all ortho- dox ! This is the faith of the Fathers, the faith of the apos- tles, the faith of the orthodox ; this faith has saved the world. Prosperity to Marcian, the new Coiistantine, the new Paul, the new David ! long years to our sovereign lord David ! You are the peace of the world, long life ! Your faith will defend you. Thou honorest Christ. He will defend thee. Thou hast established orthodoxy. ... To the august em- press, many years ! You are the lights of orthodoxy. . . . Orthodox from her birth, God will defend her. Defender of the faith, may God defend her. Pious, orthodox enemy of heretics, God will defend her. Thou hast persecuted all the heretics. May the evil eye be averted from your empire ! Worthy of the faith, worthy of Christ ! So are the faithful sovereigns honored. . . . Marcian is the new Constantine, Pulcheria is the new Helena ! . . . Your life is the safety of all ; your faith is the glory of the churches. By thee the world is at peace ; by thee the orthodox faith is established ; by thee heresy ceases to be : Long life to the emperor and empress ! " 23 The emperor then "gave thanks to Christ that unity in religion had again been restored, and threatened all, as well private men and soldiers as the clergy, with heavy punish- ment if they should again stir up controversies respecting the faith," and proposed certain ordinances which were made a part of the canons established in future sessions. As soon as he had ceased speaking, the bishops again shouted, "Thou art priest and emperor together, conqueror in war and teacher of the faith." 23 Quoted by Stanley, "History of the Eastern Church," Lecture ii, par. 34. THE COUNCIL TO LEO. 475 The council was sitting in the Church of St. Euphemia, and Marcian now announced that in honor of St. Euphemia and the council, he bestowed upon the city of Chalcedon the title and dignity of "metropolis ;" and in return the bishops all unanimously exclaimed, " This is just ; an Easter be over the whole world ; the holy Trinity will protect thee. We pray dismiss us." Instead of dismissing them, however, the emperor com- manded them to remain "three or four days longer," and to continue the proceedings. The council continued until November 1, during which time ten sessions were held, in which there was much splitting of theological hairs, pro- nouncing curses, and giving the lie ; and an immense amount of hooting and yelling in approval or condemna- tion. None of it, however, is worthy of any further notice except to say that twenty-eight canons were estab- lished, the last of which confirmed to the archbishopric of Constantinople the dignity which had been bestowed by the Council of Constantinople seventy years before, and set at rest all dispute on the matter of jurisdiction by de- creeing that in its privileges and ecclesiastical relations it should be exalted to, and hold, the first place after that of Old Rome. Against this, however, Leo's legates pro- tested at the time ; and Leo himself, in three letters one to Marcian, one to Pulcheria, and one to Anatolius denounced it in his own imperious way. Having closed its labors, the council drew up and sent to Leo a memorial beginning with the words of Psalms cxxvi, 2, which read in substance as follows : " ' Our mouth was filled with laughter, and our tongue with joy.' " The reason of this joy is the confirmation of the faith which has been preserved by your Holiness and the blissful contents of which have been translated by you as interpreter of the voice of Peter. You the bishops of Chalcedon have taken as their guide, in order to show to the sons of the church the inheritance of the truth. Your letter has been for us a spiritual, imperial banquet, tfnd we believe we have had the heavenly Bridegroom present at it in our midst. As the head over the 37 476 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. members, so have you by your representatives, had the predominance among us. In order that everything might proceed in the most orderly manner, however, the faithful emperors have had the presidency. The wild beast Dioscorus, having in his madness attacked even him who is by the Saviour a keeper of the divine vineyard, and having dared to ex- communicate him whose vocation it is to unite the body of the church, the synod has inflicted meet punishment upon him because he has not re- pented and appeared in answer to our exhortation. All our other busi- ness has been prosperously conducted by God's grace and through St. Euphemia, who has crowned the assembly held in her bridal chamber, and has transmitted its doctrinal decree as her own to her bride- groom Christ by the hand of the emperor and the empress. . . . We have also confirmed the canon of the synod of the one hundred and fifty Fath- ers, by which the second rank is assigned to the see of Constantinople, immediately after thy holy and apostolic see. We have done it with confi- dence, because you have so often allowed the apostolic ray which shines by you to appear to the church at Constantinople, and because you are accus- tomed ungrudgingly to enrich those who belong to you by allowing them participation in your own possessions. Be pleased, therefore, to embrace this decree as though it were thine own, most holy and most blessed father. Thy legates have strongly opposed it, probably because they thought that this good regulation, like the declaration of the faith, should proceed from thyself. But we were of an opinion that it belonged to the (Ecumen- ical Synod to confirm its prerogatives to the imperial city in accordance with the wish of the emperor, assuming that when thou hadst heard it, thou wouldst regard it as thine own act. For all that the sons have done, which is good, conduces to the honor of the fathers. We pray thee, honor our decree also by thine assent ; and as we have assented to thy good decree, so may thy loftiness accomplish that which is meet towards the sons. This will also please the emperors, who have sanctioned thy judgment in the faith as law ; and the see of Constantinople may well receive a reward for the zeal with which it united itself with thee in the matter of religion. In order to show that we have done nothing from favor or dislike towards any one, we have brought the whole contents of what we have done to thy knowledge, and have communicated it to thee for confirmation and assent." This was followed up December 18, by two letters to Leo from the emperor and the archbishop of Constantinople, Anatolius, saying that he had constantly done all for the honor of Leo and his legates, and from reverence for the pope, the council and himself had transmitted all to Leo for IMPERIAL EDICTS ENFORCE THE CREED. 477 his approval and confirmation ; Marcian expressing his glad- ness that the true faith had received its expression in accord- ance with the letter of Leo, and both praying him to approve and confirm the decrees of the council, and especially the canon in reference to the see of Constantinople. Leo stead- ily denounced that canon, however. But as Anatolius, in a letter, April, 454, acknowledged to Leo: "The whole force and confirmation of the decrees have been reserved for your Holiness ; " this was to yield absolutely all to Leo, so far as it was possible for the council and its members to go. February 7, A. D. 452, the emperor Marcian, in the name of himself and Valentinian III, issued the following edict confirming the creed of the council : " That which has been so greatly and universally desired is at last accomplished. The controversy respecting orthodoxy is over, and unity of opinion is restored among the nations. The bishops assembled in Chalcedon at my command from various exarchies, have taught with exactness in a doctrinal decree what is to be maintained in respect to religion. All unholy controversy must now cease, as he is certainly impious and sacrilegious who, after the declaration made by so many bishops, thinks that there still remains something for his own judgment to examine. For it is evidently a sign of extreme folly when a man seeks for a deceptive light in broad day. He who, after discovery has been made of the truth, still inquires after something else, seeks for falsehood. No cleric, no soldier, and generally no one, in whatever position he may be, must venture publicly to dispute concerning the faith, seeking to produce confusion, and to find pretexts for false doc- trines. For it is an insult to the holy synod to subject that which it has decreed and fundamentally established, to new examinations and public disputes, since, that which was recently defined concerning the Christian faith is in accordance with the doctrine of the three hundred and eight- een Fathers and the regulation of the one hundred and fifty Fathers. The punishment of the transgressors of this law shall not be delayed, since they are not only opponents of the lawfully established faith but also by their contentions betray the holy mysteries to the Jews and heathen. If a cleric ventures openly to dispute respecting religion, he shall be struck out of the catalogue of the clergy, the soldier shall be deprived of his belt, other persons shall be removed from the residence city, and shall have suitable punishments inflicted upon them, according to the pleasure of the courts of justice." 478 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. The following July 28, he issued a decree in which he forbade the Eutychians to have any clergy ; and if anybody should attempt to appoint any, both they who should ap- point and he who was appointed, should be punished with confiscation of goods and banishment for life. They were forbidden to hold any assemblies of any kind, or to build, or to live in, monasteries'. If they should presume to hold any kind of meeting, then the place where it was held would be confiscated, if it was with the knowledge of the owner. But if, without the knowledge of the owner it was rented by some one for them, he who rented it should be punished with a beating, with confiscation of goods, and with banish- ment. They were declared incapable of inheriting anything by will, or of appointing any Eutychian an heir. If any were found in the army, they were to be expelled from it. Those of them who had formerly been in the orthodox faith, and also the monks of the monastery he called it the "stable" of Eutyches, were to be driven entirely beyond the boundaries of the Roman empire. All their writings were to be burnt, whoever circulated them was to be ban- ished, and all instruction in the Eutychian doctrine was to be "rigorously punished." And finally, all governors of provinces with their officials, and all judges in the cities who should be negligent in enforcing the law, were to be fined ten pounds of gold, as despisers of religion and the laws. At the same time that this last decree was issued, Eutyches and Dioscorus were sentenced to banishment. Eutyches died before the sentence was enforced; and Dios- corus died in exile at Gangra in Paphlagonia two years afterward. As Leo had published his letters rejecting the canon con- cerning the see of Constantinople, and had not yet formally published any approval of the doctrinal decree of the council, the report went abroad throughout the East that he had repudiated all the decisions of the council. The report, LEO "CONFIRMS" THE CREED. 4.79 therefore, was a new incentive to all who disagreed with the creed of the council, and ' ' heresy " became again so preva- lent that February 15, A. D. 453, Marcian addressed a letter to Leo earnestly beseeching him as soon as possible to issue a decree in confirmation of the decision of the Council of Chalcedon, "so that no one might have any further doubt as to the judgment of his Holiness." March 21, Leo re- sponded in the following words : "I doubt not, brethren, that you all know how willingly I have confirmed the doctrinal decree of the Synod of Chalcedon. You would have been able to learn this not only from the assent of my legates, but also from my letters to Anatolius of Constantinople, if he had brought the answer of the apostolic see to your knowledge. But that no one may doubt my approving of that which was decreed at the Synod of Chalcedon by universal consent in regard to the faith, I have directed this letter to all my brethren and fellow-bishops who were present at the synod named, and the emperor will, at my request, send it to you, so that you may all know that, not merely by my legates, but also by my own confirmation of it, I have agreed with you in what was done at the synod ; but only, as must always be repeated, in regard to the subject of the faith, on account of which the general council was assembled at the command of the emperors, in agreement with the apostolic see. But in regard to the regulations of the Fathers of Nicsea, I admonish you that the rights of the individual churches must remain unaltered, as they were there established by the inspired Fathers. No unlawful ambition must covet that which is not its own, and no one must increase by the diminution of others. And that which pride has obtained by enforced assent, and thinks to have confirmed by the name of a council, is invalid, if it is in opposition to the canons of the aforesaid Fathers [of Nicsea]. How reverentially the apostolic see maintains the rules of these Fathers, and that I by God's help shall be a guardian of the Catholic faith and of the ecclesiastical canons, you may see from the letter by which I have re- sisted the attempts of the bishop of Constantinople." As the necessity for the Council of Chalcedon was created by the will of Leo alone ; as the council when assembled was ruled from beginning to end by his legates in his name ; as the documents presented in the council were addressed to "Leo, the most holy, blessed, and universal patriarch of 480 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. the great city of Rome, and to the holy and (Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon ; " as the council distinctly acknowl- edged Leo as its head, and the members of the council as members of him ; as the judgments were pronounced as his own ; as his letter was made the test, and the expression of the faith, and with that all were required to agree ; as the decisions of the council were submitted to him for approval, and were practically of little or no force until he had formally published his approval, and then only such portion as he did approve ; as, in skort, everything in connection with the council sprung from his will and returned in subjection to his will, Leo, and in him the bishopric of Rome, thus be- came essentially the fountain of the Catholic faith. It is not at all surprising, therefore, that Leo should officially declare that the doctrinal decrees of the Council of Chalcedon were inspired. This is precisely what he did. In a letter to Bishop Julian of Cos (Epistle 144), he said : ' ' The decrees of Chalcedon are inspired by the Holy Spirit, and are to ~be received as the definition of the faith for the welfare of the whole world." And in a letter (Epistle 145) to the emperor Leo, who succeeded Marcian in A. D. 457, he said : ' ' The Synod of Chalcedon was held by divine in- spiration." As, therefore, the doctrinal decrees of the Council of Chalcedon were the expression of the will of Leo ; and as these decrees were published and held as of divine inspiration ; by this turn, it was a very short cut to the infallibility of the bishop of Rome. Now let the reader turn to pages 436 and 470 and 472, and compare the Italicized words in the statement of Euty- ches, in the statement of the commissioners in the council, and in the creed of Chalcedon. It will be seen that Leo and the council came so near to saying what Eutyches had said, that no difference can be perceived. Eutyches had been condemned as a heretic for saying that in Christ, after the incarnation, the two natures are one. Now Leo and THE WORK OF THE FOUR COUNCILS. 481 the council express the orthodox faith by saying that in Christ there are two natures united in one. In other words, Eutyches was a condemned heretic for saying that Christ is "<9/ two natures ; " while Leo and the council were declared everlastingly orthodox for saying that Christ is "m two natures." In Greek, the difference was expressed in the two small words, ek and en / which, like the two large words, Homoousion and Homoiousion, in the beginning of the controversy between Alexander and Arius, differed only in a single letter. And like that also, the meaning of the two words is so "essentially the same," that he who believes either, believes the other. ' ' Such was the device of the envious and God-hating demon in the change of a single letter, that, while in reality the one expression was com- pletely inductive of the notion of the other, still with the generality the discrepancy between them was held to be con- siderable, and the ideas conveyed by them to be clearly in diametric opposition, and exclusive of each other ; whereas he who confesses Christ in two natures, clearly affirms him to be from two, . . . and on the other hand, the position of one who affirms his origin from two natures, is completely inclusive of his existence in two. ... So that in this case by the expression, ''from two natures,' is aptly suggested the thought of the expression, i in two,' and conversely; nor can there l>e a severance of the terms." JEvagriv^. Zi And that is all that there was in this dispute, or in any of those before it, in itself. Yet out of it there came con- stant and universal violence, hypocrisy, bloodshed, and murder, which speedily wrought the utter ruin of the empire, and established a despotism over thought which remained supreme for ages, and which is yet asserted and far too largely assented to. 2 * " Ecclesiastical History," book II, chap, v; Hefele's "History of the Church Councils," sec. 193, par. 5, note ; Schaff's " History of the Christian Church," Vol. Hi, \ 140, par 9. note 2 ; 141, par. 12, note 4. 4:82 THE POPE MADE AUTHOR OF THE FAITH. The whole world having been thus once more brought to the "unity of the faith," the controversy, the confusion, and the violence, went on worse than before. But as the faith of Leo which was established by the Council of Chalcedon, "substantially completes the orthodox Christology of the ancient church," and has "passed into all the confessions of the Protestant churches " (Schaff z5 } ; and as the work of these four general councils Nice, Constantinople, first of Ephesus, and Chalcedon was to put dead human formulas in the place of the living oracles of God, a woman in the place of Christ, and a MAN IN THE PLACE OF GOD, it is not necessary to follow any farther the course of ambitious strife and contentious deviltry. 25 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 142, par. 1, 3. CHAPTER XX. THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. events related in the five chapters immediately pre- 1 ceding this, abundantly demonstrate that the promise of the unity of the faith, which the bishops made to Constan- tine, was a fraud ; and that the blessings which were prom- ised and expected to accrue to the State by the union with the Church, proved a continual and horrible curse to the State and to society in general. In tracing the faith of the Catholic Church, it has been necessary to deal most largely with society and the State in the East. But bad as it was in the East, it was worse in the West. The reason is that in the Eastern empire the imperial authority held its place above the church the civil power remained superior to the ecclesiastical ; whereas in the Western empire, the church exalted itself above the State the ecclesiastical was made superior to the civil power. To trace the course, and to discover the result, of the workings of the Western system, that is, of the papacy in fact, is the purpose of the present chapter. In the sketch of the bishops of Home from Melchiades to Leo, given in the foregoing chapter, we have seen the working of the episcopal spirit in exalting the bishopric of Rome to the place of supremacy in religion. In the con- troversies which we have traced, it is clearly seen that in order to secure the weight of the influence of the bishop of Rome, each one to his particular side of the question, the parties to the innumerable controversies which kept every- thing in a ferment, were always ready to bestow every sort [483] 484 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. of flattering title and token of distinction upon him to whom they appealed. Then when the controversy had culminated in the inevitable council, the victorious party, if in harmony with the bishop of Rome, added to its flattering unction on him the weight of the council in whatever dignities and honors it might choose to bestow. In fact, there was never a controversy in which there was not an appeal to the bishop of Home by one or both parties, and almost always by both. And there never was a general council that agreed with the bishop of Rome, by which there was not some special honor or dignity conferred upon him. On the other hand, there was a curious train of political events which conspired to the same result, and which yet more fully opened the way for the church to usurp the civil power, and for the bishop of Rome to encroach upon the imperial authority. Diocletian established his capital at Nicomedia, and Maximian his at Milan, A. D. 304 ; and with the exception of Maxentius and Constantine, during brief periods, never afterward was there an emperor who made Rome his capital : and even while Constantine did so, instead of detracting from the dignity of the bishop of Rome, it added to it ; for as we have seen, the bishop of Rome bore a leading part in the formation of the union of Church and State, and the moment that that union was consummated, "the bishop of Rome rises at once to the rank of a great accredited functionary. ... So long as Constantine was in Rome, the bishop of Rome, the head of the emperor's religion, became in public estimation, ... in authority and influence, immeasurably the superior, to all of sacerdotal rank. . . . As long as Rome is the imperial residence, an appeal to the emperor is an appeal to the bishop of Rome." Milman. 1 Thus the presence of Constantine in Rome redounded to the importance and dignity of the bishopric of Rome ; but it was not until Constantine had moved his capital to Constan- tinople, that the way was opened for the full play of that 1 " History of Latin Christianity," book I, chap, ii, par. 1. EVENTS TEAT FAVORED THE PAPACY. 485 arrogant spirit that has ever been the chief characteristic of that dignitary. "The absence of a secular competitor allowed the papal authority to grow up and to develop its secret strength " (Milman 2 ) ; and under the blandishments of necessitous imperial favor he did as he pleased, and more rapidly than ever his power grew. In the sketch of the hierarchy, given on page 390, it will be noticed that in the gradation of the church dignita- ries the ascent was only so far as corresponded to the four prefects in the State. There was not above the four patri- archs a bishop over all, as above the prefects the emperor was over all. The one great reason for this is that Constan- tine was not only emperor but bishop, and as "bishop of externals " in the church, he held the place of chief bishop, supreme pontiff over the four patriarchs precisely as 'he held as emperor the chief authority over the four prefects. Yet, in the nature of things, it was inevitable and only a question of time when the bishop of Rome would assert as a matter of right, his supremacy over all others, and when this should be accomplished, the matter of the supremacy would then lie between him and the emperor alone, which would open the way for the bishop of Home to encroach upon the civil and imperial authority. This spirit showed itself in the action of the bishop of Borne in studiously avoiding the title of "patriarch," "as placing him on a level with other patriarchs." He always preferred the title of "papa," or "pope" (/ScfM/" 3 ) : and this, because "patriarch" bespeaks an oligarchical church government, that is, government by a few ; whereas "pope" bespeaks a monarchical church government, that is, government by one. Again : in all the "West there was no rival to the bishop of Rome. Whereas in the East there were three rivals to one another, whose jealousies not only curbed the encroach- ments of one another, but built up the influence and author- ity of the bishop of Rome. 8 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, iii, par. 1. 8 " History of the Christain Church," Vol. iii, \ 55, par. 1, note. 486 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. In addition to all these things, both the weakness and the strength of the imperial influence and authority were made to serve the ambitious spirit of the bishopric of Rome. After Constantino's death, with the exception of Valentinian I, there never was a single able emperor of the "West ; and even Valentinian I was the servant of the bishop of Rome to the extent that he " enacted a law empowering the bishop of Rome to examine and judge other bishops." Bower. * When Constantius exercised authority over the West, the bishop of Rome openly defied his authority ; and although Liberius afterward changed his views and submitted, the example was never forgotten. And when Theodosius for a brief period exercised authority in the West, it was not only as the servant of the bishop of Rome, but as the subject of the bishop of Milan. It is true that the power of Ambrose in that particular case was exercised in a just cause. But a power that could be carried to such extremes in a cause that was just, could as easily be carried to the same extreme in a cause that was unjust. So it had been exercised before this on several occasions, and so it was exercised afterward on numberless occasions, and by others than Ambrose. All these things conspired to open the way for the exalta- tion of the ecclesiastical above the civil power ; and the ecclesiastics walked diligently in the way thus opened. The seed which directly bore this evil fruit, was also sown in that dark intrigue between Constantine and the bishops, which formed the union of Church and State, and created the papacy. That seed was sown when Constantine be- stowed upon the bishops the right of judgment in civil matters. It is a doctrine of Christianity, first, that there shall be no disputes among Christians, and, second, if any such do arise, then Christians must settle such differences among themselves, and not go to law before unbelievers. I Cor. vi, 1-7. * "History of the Popes," Damasus, par. 8. TEE BISHOPS CENSORS OF MAGISTRATES. 48T This order was faithfully followed in the church at the beginning ; but as the power and influence of the bishopric grew, this office was usurped by the bishop, and all such cases were decided by him alone. Until the union of Church and State, however, every man had the right of appeal from the decision of the bishop to the civil magistrate. Very shortly after the establishment of the Catholic Church, " Constantiiie likewise enacted a law in favor of the clergy, permitting judgment to be passed by the bishops when litigants preferred appealing to them rather than to the secular court ; he enacted that their decree should be valid, and as far superior to that of other judges as if pronounced by the emperor himself ; that the governors and subordinate military officers should see to the execution of these decrees ; and that sentence, when Dassed by them, should be irre- versible." So&omen. 1 This was only in cases, however, where the disputants voluntarily appeared and submitted their causes to the de- cision of the bishops. Yet as the bishops were ever ready to "extend their authority far beyond their jurisdiction, and their influence far beyond their authority" (Milman),* they so worked this power as to make their business as judges occupy the principal portion of their time. "To worldly- minded bishops it furnished a welcome occasion for devoting themselves to any foreign and secular affairs, rather than to the appropriate business of their spiritual calling ; and the same class might also allow themselves to be governed by impure motives in the settlement of these disputes." Neander. 1 Some bishops extended this right into what was known as the right of intervention, that is, the right of interceding with the secular power in certain cases. "The privilege of 5 " Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap, ix, par. 2. 6 " History of Christianity," book iv, chap, i, par. 49. 7 "History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Second, part i, div. i, par. 12. 488 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. interceding with the secular power for criminals, prisoners, and unfortunates of every kind, had belonged to the heathen priests, and especially to the vestals, and now passed to the Christian ministry, above all to the bishops, and thenceforth became an essential function of their office." Schaff.* This office was first assumed by the heathenized bishops for this purpose, but soon instead of interceding they began to dictate ; instead of soliciting they began to command ; and instead, of pleading for deserving unfortunates, they interfered with the genuine administration of the civil mag- istrates. As early as the Council of Aries, A. D. 314, the second council that was held by the direction of Constantine, the church power began to encroach in this matter upon the jurisdiction of the State. Canon 7 of this council, charged the bishops to take the oversight of such of the civil magis- trates within their respective sees, as were church members ; and if the magistrates acted inconsistently with their Chris- tian duties, they should be turned out of the church. 9 This was at once to give to the bishops the direction of the course of civil matters. And the magistrates who were members of the church, and it was not long before the great majority of them were such, knowing that their acts were to be passed upon for approval or disapproval by the bishop, chose to take counsel of him beforehand so as to be sure to act according to "discipline," and avoid being excom- municated. Thus by an easy gradation and extension of power, the bishopric assumed jurisdiction over the jurispru- dence of the State. Further, as the empire was now a religious State, a "kingdom of God," the Bible was made the code of civil procedure as well as of religion. More than this, it was the Bible as interpreted T)y the Jjishops. Yet, more than this, it 8 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, \ 16, par. 5. 'Neander, "History of the Christian Keligion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Secoud, part i, div. i, par. 14 ; and the canon itself in Hefele's "History of the Church Councils." THE BIBLE 18 MADE THE CODE. 489 was the Bible as interpreted by the bishops according to the Fathers. "The Bible, and the Bible interpreted by the Fathers, became the code, not of religion only, but of every branch of knowledge." Milman. And as the Fathers themselves, necessarily, had to be interpreted, the bishops became the sole interpreters of the code, as well as the censors of the magistracy, in all the jurisprudence of the empire. The advice which one of the model bishops in the church in the estimation of some, a model even to this day 11 gave upon a certain occasion to a magistrate who had con- sulted him in regard to the performance of his duty, well illustrates the workings of this system as a system. A cer- tain officer consulted Ambrose, bishop of Milan, as to what he would better do in a certain criminal case. Ambrose told him that according to Romans xiii, he was authorized to use the sword in punishment of the crime ; yet, at the same time, advised him to imitate Christ in his treatment of the woman mentioned in John viii, who had been taken in adul- tery, and forgive the criminal ; because if the criminal had never been baptized, he might yet be converted and obtain forgiveness of his sin : and if he had been baptized, it was proper to give him an opportunity to repent and reform. 12 With the Bible as the code, this was the only thing that could be done, and this the only proper advice that could be given. For Christ distinctly commands : " Judge not ;" "Condemn not." And he does directly command that when a brother offends and is reproved, if he repents, he is to be forgiven ; and if he does it seven times in a day and seven times in a day turns and says "I repent," so often is he to be forgiven. Therefore, with the Bible as the code, the advice which Ambrose gave was the only advice which 10 " History of Christianity," book iv, chap, v, par. 17. 11 See Schaff, " History of the Christian Church," Vol, iii, 175. 12 Neander, " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Second, part i, div. i, par. 14. 490 THE CHURCn USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. could properly be given. But it was destructive of civil government. And this is only to say that it was an utter perversion of the Bible to make it the code of civil procedure. Such procedure therefore in civil government where there was no possible means of knowing that repentance was genuine or reformation sure, was to destroy civil govern- ment, and substitute for it only a pretense at moral govern- ment which was absolutely impotent for any good purpose, either moral or civil. In other words, it was only to destroy the State, and to substitute for it, in everything, the church. This is not saying anything against the Bible, nor against its principles. It is only exposing the awful perversion of its principles by the church in exalting its authority above the State. God's government is moral, and he has made provision for maintaining his government with the forgive- ness of transgression. But he has made no such provision for civil government. No such provision can be made, and civil government be maintained. The Bible reveals God's method of saving those who sin against his moral govern- ment. Civil government is man's method of preserving order, and has nothing to do with sin, nor the salvation of sinners. Civil government prosecutes a man and finds him guilty. If before the penalty is executed he repents, God forgives him ; but the government must execute the penalty. And this authority was carried much further than merely to advise. The monks and clergy went so far at last as ac- tually to tear away from the civil authorities, criminals and malefactors of the worst sort, who had been justly con- demned. To such an extent was this carried that a law had to be enacted in 398 ordering that "the monks and the clergy should not be permitted to snatch condemned male- factors from their merited punishment." Neander. Yet they were still allowed the right of intercession. This evil led directly to another, or rather only deepened and perpetuated itself. Ecclesiastical offices, especially the bishoprics, were the only ones in the empire that were elect- 13 Id., par. 17, note. THE BISHOPRIC A POLITICAL OFFICE. 491 ive. As we have seen, all manner of vile and criminal characters had been brought into the church. Consequently these had a voice in the elections. It became therefore an object for the unruly, violent, and criminal classes to secure the election of such men as would use the episcopal influ- ence in their interests, and shield them from justice. "As soon as a bishop had closed his eyes, the metropoli- tan issued a commission to one of his suffragans to adminis- ter the vacant see, and prepare, within a limited time, the future election. The right of voting was vested in the infe- rior clergy, who were best qualified to judge of the merit of the candidates ; in the senators or nobles of the city, all those who were distinguished by their rank or property ; and finally in the whole body of the people who, on the appointed day, flocked in multitudes from the most remote parts of the diocese, and sometimes silenced by their tumult- uous acclamations, the voice of reason and the laws of disci- pline. These acclamations might accidentally fix on the head of the most deserving competitor ; of some ancient presbyter, some holy monk, or some layman, conspicuous for his zeal and piety. ' ' But the episcopal chair was solicited, especially in the great and opulent cities of the empire, as 'a temporal rather than as a spiritual dignity. The interested views, the selfish and angry passions, the arts of perfidy and dissimulation, the secret corruption, the open and even bloody violence which had formerly disgraced the freedom of election in the commonwealths of Greece and Rome, too often influenced the choice of the successors of the apostles. While one of the candidates boasted the honors of his family, a second allured his judges by the delicacies of a plentiful table, and a third, more guilty than his rivals, offered to share the plunder of the church among the accomplices of his sacrile- gious hopes." - Gibbon. The offices of the church, and especially the bishopric, thus became virtually political, and were made subject to al] " " Decline and Fall," chap, xx, par. 22. 38 492 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. the strife of political methods. As the logical result, the political schemers, the dishonest men, the men of violent and selfish dispositions, pushed themselves to the front in every place ; and those who might have given a safe direc- tion to public affairs, were crowded to the rear, a*nd in fact completely shut out of office by the very violence of those who would have office at any cost. Thus by the very workings of the wicked elements which had been brought into the church by the political methods of Constantino and the bishops, genuine Christianity was sep- arated from this whole Church and State system, as it had been before from the pagan system. The genuine Chris- tians, who loved the quiet and the peace which belong with the Christian profession, were reproached by the formal, hypocritical, political religionists who represented both the Church and the State, or rather the Church and the State in one, the real Christians were reproached by these with being "righteous overmuch." " It was natural, however, that the bad element, which had outwardly assumed the Christian garb, should push itself more prominently to notice in public life. Hence it was more sure to attract the common gaze, while the genuinely Christian temper loved retirement, and created less sensa- tion." "At the present time, the relation of vital Christianity to the Christianity of mere form, resembled that which, in the preceding period, existed between the Christianity of those to whom religion was a serious concern, and paganism, which constituted the prevailing rule of life. As in the earlier times, the life of genuine Christians had stood out in strong contrast with the life of the pagan world, so now the life of such as were Christians not merely by outward pro- fession, but also in the temper of their hearts, presented a strong contrast with the careless and abandoned life of the ordinary nominal Christians. By these latter, the others . . . were regarded in the same light as, in earlier times, THE WORST CHARACTERS BECOME BISHOPS. 493 the Christians had been regarded by the pagans. They were also reproached by these nominal Christians, just as the Christians generally had been taunted before by the pa- gans, with seeking to be righteous overmuch." Neander. In the episcopal elections, " Sometimes the people acted under outside considerations and the management of dema- gogues, and demanded unworthy or ignorant men for the highest offices. Thus there were frequent disturbances and collisions, and even bloody conflicts, as in the election of Damasus in Rome. In short all the selfish passions and corrupting influences which had spoiled the freedom of the popular political elections in the Grecian and Roman repub- lics, and which appear also in the republics of modern times, intruded upon the elections of the church. And the clergy likewise often suffered themselves to be guided by impure motives." Schaff. It was often the case that a man who had never been baptized, and was not even a member of the church, would be elected a bishop, and hurried through the minor offices to this position. Such was the case with Ambrose, bishop of Milan, in A. D. 374, and Nectarius, bishop of Constanti- nople, in 381, and many others. In the contention for the bishopric, there was as much political intrigue, strife, con- tention, and even bloodshed, as there had formerly been for the office of consul in the republic in the days of Pompey and Caesar. It often happened that men of fairly good character were compelled to step aside and allow low characters to be elected to office, for fear they would cause more mischief, tumult, and riot if they were not elected than if they were. Instances actually occurred, and are recorded by Gregory Nazianzen, in which certain men who were not members of the church at all, were elected to the bishopric in opposition to others 15 "History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Third, part i, div. 1. par. 5, 6. 16 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 49, par. 2. 494 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. who had every churchly qualification for the office, because "they had the worst men in the city on their side." 17 And Chrysostom says that " many are elected on account of their badness, to prevent the mischief they would otherwise do." 18 Such characters as these elected to office by such characters as those, and the office representing such authority as that did, nothing but evil of the worst kind could accrue either to the civil government or to society at large. More than this, as the men thus elected were the dis- pensers of doctrine and the interpreters of Scripture in all points both religious and civil ; and as they owed their posi- tion to those who elected them, it was only the natural con- sequence that they adapted their interpretations to the char- acter and wishes of those who had placed them in their positions. For ' ' when once a political aspirant has bidden with the multitude for power, and still depends on their pleasure for effective support, it is no easy thing to re- fuse their wishes, or hold back from their demands." Draper. 19 Nectarius, who has been already mentioned after he had been taken from the prsetorship and made bishop by such a method of election as the above -elected bishop of Con- stantinople before he had been baptized wished to ordain his physician as one of his own deacons. 'The physician declined on the ground that he was not morally fit for the office. Nectarius endeavored to persuade him by saying, "Did not I, who am now a priest, formerly live much more immorally than thou, as thou thyself well knowest, since thou wast often an accomplice of my many iniquities ?" Schaff. 20 The physician still refused, but for a reason which was scarcely more honorable than that by which he was 17 Neander's " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Second, part i, div. ii, par. 9, note. 18 Schaff's " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, | 49, par. 2, note 5. 19 " Intellectual Development of Europe," Vol. i, chap, x, par. 6. 20 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, I 59, par. 2. THE EPISCOPAL DICTATORSHIP. 495 urged. The reason was that although he had been baptized, he had continued to practice his iniquities, while Nectarius had quit his when he was baptized. The bishops' assumption of authority over the civil juris- prudence did not allow itself to be limited to the inferior magistrates. It asserted authority over the jurisdiction of the emperor himself. "In Ambrose the sacerdotal char- acter assumed a dignity and an influence as yet unknown ; it first began to confront the throne, not only on terms of equality, but of superior authority, and to exercise a spirit- ual dictatorship over the supreme magistrate. The resist- ance of Athanasius to the imperial authority had been firm but deferential, passive rather than aggressive. In his public addresses he had respected the majesty of the em- pire ; at all events, the hierarchy of that period only ques- tioned the authority of the sovereign in matters of faith. But in Ambrose the episcopal power acknowledged no lim- its to its moral dominion, and admitted no distinction of persons. " Milman. 21 As the Church and the State were identical, and as who- ever refused to submit to the dictates of the bishopric was excommunicated from the church, this meant that the only effect of disobedience to the bishop was to become an out- cast in society, if not an outlaw in the State. And more than this, in the state of abject superstition which now pre- vailed, excommunication from the church was supposed to mean consignment to perdition only. "The hierarchical power, from exemplary, persuasive, amiable, was now au- thoritative, commanding, awful. When Christianity became the most powerful religion, when it became the religion of the many, of the emperor, of the State, the convert or the hereditary Christian had no strong pagan party to receive him back into its bosom when outcast from the church. If he ceased to believe, he no longer dared cease to obey. No course remained but prostrate submission, or the endurance 21 " History of Christianity," book iii, chap, x, par. 2. 496 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. of any penitential duty which might be enforced upon him." Milman. "When the alliance was made between the bishops and Constantine, it was proposed that the jurisdiction of the civil and ecclesiastical authorities should remain separate, as being two arms of the same responsible body. This was shown in that saying of Constantine in which he represented himself as a "bishop of externals" of the church, that which per- tained more definitely to its connection with civil society and conduct ; while the regular bishops were bishops of the internal, or those things pertaining to the sacraments, ordi- nation, etc. " Constantine . . . was the first representative of the imposing idea of a Christian theocracy, or of a system of policy which assumes all subjects to be Christians, con- nects civil and religious rights, and regards Church and State as the two arms of one and the same divine government on earth. This idea was more fully developed by his success- ors, it animated the whole Middle Age, and is yet working under various forms in- these latest times." ScJMff. To those who conceived it, this theory might have ap- peared well enough, and simply in theory it might have been imagined that it could be made to work ; but when it came to be put into practice, the all-important question was, Where was the line which defined the exact limits between the juris- diction of the magistrate and that of the bishop ? between the authority of the Church and that of the State? The State was now a theocracy. The government was held to be moral, a government of God ; the Bible the supreme code of morals, "was the code of the government ; there was no such thing as civil government all was moral. But the subject of morals is involved in every action, yea, in every thought of man. The State then being allowed to be moral, it was inevitable that the church, being the arbiter of morals and the dispenser and interpreter *f the code regu- lating moral action, would interpose in all questions of 22 Id., book iv, chap, i, t>ar. 85. 88 "History of the Christian Church." VoL iii, \ 2, par. 8. CIVIL GOVERNMENT VANISHES. 497 human conduct, and spread her dominion over the whole field of human action. " In ecclesiastical affairs, strictly so called, the supremacy of the Christian magistracy, it has been said, was admitted. They were the legislators of discipline, order, and doctrine. The festivals, the fasts, the usages, and canons of the church, the government of the clergy, were in their ex- clusive power. The decrees of particular synods and coun- cils possessed undisputed authority, as far as their sphere extended. General councils were held binding on the whole church. But it was far more easy to define that which did belong to the province of the church than that which did not. Religion asserts its authority, and endeavors to extend its influence over the whole sphere of moral action, which is, in fact, over the whole of human life, its habits, manners, conduct. ' ' Christianity, as the most profound moral religion, ex- acted the most complete and universal obedience ; and, as the acknowledged teachers and guardians of Christianity, the clergy continued to draw within their sphere every part of human life in which man is actuated by moral or religious motives. The moral authority, therefore, of the religion, and consequently of the clergy, might appear legitimately to ex- tend over every transaction of life, from the legislature of the sovereign, which ought, in a Christian king, to be guided by Christian motive, to the domestic duties of the peasant, which ought to be fulfilled on the principle of Christian love. . . . "But there was another prolific source of difference. The clergy, in one sense, from being the representative body, had begun to consider themselves the church; but, in another and more legitimate sense, the State, when Christian, as comprehending all the Christians of the empire, became the Church. Which was the legislative body, the whole community of Christians ? or the Chris- tian aristocracy, who were in one sense the admitted rulers ? -Milman.** 84 "History of Christianity, book Iv, chap. 1, par. 58-66. 498 THE CHURCH USURPS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY. To overstep every limit and break down every barrier that seemed in theory to be set between the civil and eccle- siastical powers, was the only consequence that could result from such a union. And when itjwas attempted to put the theory into practice, every step taken in any direction only served to demonstrate that which the history everywhere shows, that "the apparent identification of the State and Church by the adoption of Christianity as the religion of the empire, altogether confounded the limits of ecclesiastical and temporal jurisdiction." JMJUman.** The State, as a body distinct from the Church, was gone. As a distinct system of law and government the State was destroyed, and its machinery existed only as the tool of the Church to accomplish her arbitrary will and to enforce her despotic decrees. 25 "History of Latin Christianity," book ii, chap, iii, par. 40. -m CHAPTER XXI. THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. WE have seen the church secure the enactment of laws by which she could enforce church discipline upon all the people, whether in the church or not. We have seen her next extend her encroachments upon the civil power, until the whole- system of civil jurisprudence, as such, was destroyed by being made religious. We shall now see how the evils thus engendered, and like dragon's teeth sown broadcast, with another element of the monstrous evil planted by Con- stantino and the bishops, caused the final and fearful ruin of the Roman empire. Among the first of the acts of Constantino in his favors to the church was, as has been shown on page 290 of this book, the appropriation of money from the public treasury to the bishops. Another enactment, A. D. 321, of the same character, but which was of vastly more importance, was his glinting to the church the right to receive legacies. "This was a law which expressly secured to the churches a right which, per- haps, they had already now and then tacitly exercised ; namely, the right of receiving legacies, which, in the Roman empire, no corporation whatever was entitled to exercise, unless it had been expressly authorized to do so by the State." Neander. 1 Some estimate of this enactment may be derived from the statement that " the law of Constantime which empow- 1 " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. 11, Section Second, part i, div. 1, par. 7. [499] 500 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. ered the clergy of the church to receive testamentary be quests, and to hold land, was a gift which would scarcely have been exceeded if he had granted them two provinces of the empire." Milman* That which made this still more magnificent gift to the church was the view which prevailed, especially among the rich, that they could live as they pleased all their lives, and then at their death give their property to the church, and be assured a safe conduct to eternal bliss. "It became almost a sin to die without some bequest to pious uses." Milman* We have seen in the previous chapter what kind of char- acters were chosen to the bishopric in those times ; and when such a law was now made bestowing such privileges upon such characters, it is easy to understand what use would be made of the privilege. Not content with simply receiving bequests that might voluntarily be made, they brought to bear every possible means to induce persons to bestow their goods upon the churches. They assumed the protectorship of widows and orphans, and had the property of such persons left to the care of the bishop. Now into the coffers of the bishops, as into the coffers of the republic after the fall of Carthage, wealth came in a rolling stream of gold, and the result in this case was the same as in that. With wealth came luxury and magnificent display. The bishopric assumed a stateliness and grandeur that transcended that of the chief ministers of the empire ; and that of the bishopric of Rome fairly outshone the glory of the emperor himself. He was the chief beneficiary in all these favors of Constantine. As already related, when the emperors in the time of Diocletian began habitually to absent themselves from Rome, the bishop of Rome became the chief dignitary in the city. And by the time that Constantine moved the capital perma- nently from Rome, through these imperial favors the bishop of that city had acquired such a dignity that it was easy for him to step into the place of pomp and magnificent display 2 " History of Christianity," book iv, chap, i, par. 39. 3 Id. TEE BISHOPRIC OF ROME. 501 that had before been shown by the emperor. ' ' The bishop of Rome became a prince of the empire, and lived in a style of luxury and pomp that awakened the envy or the just indig- nation of the heathen writer, Marcellinus. The church was now enriched by the gifts and bequests of the pious and the timid ; the bishop drew great revenues from his farms in the Campagna and his rich plantations in Sicily ; he rode through the streets of Rome in a stately chariot, and clothed in gorgeous attire ; his table was supplied with a profusion more than imperial ; the proudest women of Rome loaded him with lavish donations, and followed him with their flat- teries and attentions ; and his haughty bearing and profuse luxury were remarked upon by both pagans and Christians as strangely inconsistent with the humility and simplicity en- joined by the faith which he professed."- Eugene Lawrence.* The offices of the church were the only ones in the em- pire that were elective. The bishopric of Rome was the chief of these offices. As that office was one which carried with it the command of such enormous wealth and such dis- play of imperial magnificence, it became the object of the ambitious aspirations of every Catholic in the city ; and even a heathen exclaimed, "Make me bishop of Rome, and I will be a Christian ! " Here were displayed all those elements of political strife and chicanery which were but referred to in the previous chapter. The scenes which occurred at the election of Damasus as bishop of Rome, A. D. 366, will illustrate the character of such proceedings throughout the empire, ac- cording as the particular bishopric in question compared with that of Rome. There were two candidates Damasus and Ursicinus and these two men represented respectively two factions that had been created in the contest between Liberius, bishop of Rome, and Constantius, emperor of Rome. "The presbyters, deacons, and faithful people, who had adhered to Liberius in his exile, met in the Julian Basilica, * " Historical Studies," Bishops of Rome, par. 13. 502 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. and duly elected Ursicinus, who was consecrated by Paul, bishop of Tibur. Damasus was proclaimed by the followers of Felix, in S. M. Lucina. Damasus collected a mob of charioteers and a wild rabble, broke into the Julian Basilica, and committed great slaughter. Seven days after, having bribed a great body of ecclesiastics and the populace, and seized the Lateran Church, he was elected and consecrated bishop. Ursicinus was expelled from Rome. "Damasus, however, continued his acts of violence. Seven presbyters of the other party were hurried prisoners to Lateran : their faction rose, rescued them, and carried them to the Basilica of Liberius. Damasus at the head of a gang of gladiators, charioteers, and laborers, with axes, swords, and clubs, stormed the church : a hundred and sixty of both sexes were barbarously killed ; not one on the side of Damasus. The party of Ursicinus were obliged to withdraw, vainly petitioning for a synod of bishops to exam- ine into the validity of the two elections. "So long and obstinate was the conflict, that Juventius, the prefect of the city, finding his authority contemned, his forces unequal to keep the peace, retired into the neighbor- hood of Rome. Churches were garrisoned, churches be- sieged, churches stormed and deluged with blood. In one day, relates Ammianus, above one hundred and thirty dead bodies were counted in the Basilica of Sisinnius. . . . Nor did the contention cease with the first discomfiture and banishment of Ursicinus : he was more than once recalled, exiled, again set up as rival bishop, and re-exiled. An- other frightful massacre took place in the Church of St. Agnes. The emperor was forced to have recourse to the character and firmness of the famous heathen Prastextatus, as successor to Juventius in the government of Rome, in order to put down with impartial severity these disastrous tumults. Some years elapsed before Damasus was in undisputed possessions of his see." "But Damasus had the ladies of Rome in his favor ; and the council of Yal- entinian was not inaccessible to bribes. New scenes of PRIDE OF THE BISHOPS AND CLERQY. 503 blood took place. Ursicinus was compelled at last to give up the contest." Milmcm. & Of the bishop of Rome at this time we have the follow- ing sketch written by one who was there at the time, and had often seen him in his splendor: "I must own that when I reflect on the pomp attending that dignity, I do not at all wonder that those who are fond of show and parade, should scold, quarrel, fight, and strain every nerve to attain it ; since they are sure, if they succeed, to be enriched with the offerings of the ladies ; to appear no more abroad on foot, but in stately chariots, and gorgeously attired ; to keep costly and sumptuous tables ; nay, and to surpass the em- perors themselves in the splendor and magnificence of their entertainments. " Ammianus Marcellinus. 6 The example of the bishop 'of Rome was followed by the whole order of bishops, each according to his degree and opportunities. Chrysostom boasted that " the heads of the empire and the governors of provinces enjoy no such honor as the rulers of the church. They are first at court, in the society of ladies, in the houses of the great. No one has precedence of them." By them were worn such titles as, "Most holy," "Most reverend," and "Most holy Lord." They were addressed in such terms as, " Thy Holiness," and "Thy Blessedness." "Kneeling, kissing of the hand, and like tokens of reverence, came to be shown them by all classes, up to the emperor himself." ScJiajf.' 1 The manners of the minor clergy of Rome are described by one who was well acquainted with them. " His whole care is in his dress, that it be well perfumed ; that his feet may not slip about in a loose sandal ; his hair is crisped with a curling-pin ; his fingers glitter with rings ; he walks on tiptoe lest he should splash himself with the wet soil ; 5 " History of Latin Christianity," book i, chap, ii, par. 18, and note. 6 Book xxvii, chap, iii, par. 12-15, Bower's translation in "History of the Popes," Damasus, par. 6. 7 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, \ 53, par. 3. 504 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. when you see him, you would think him a bridegroom rather than an ecclesiastic." Jerome.* Such an example being set by the dignitaries in the church, these too professing to be the patterns of godliness, their ex- ample was readily followed by all in the empire who were able. Consequently, "The aristocratical life of this period seems to have been characterized by gorgeous magnificence without grandeur, inordinate luxury without refinement, the pomp and prodigality of a high state of civilization with none of its ennobling or humanizing effects. The walls of the pal- aces were lined with marbles of all colors, crowded with statues of inferior workmanship, mosaics of which the merit consisted in the arrangement of the stones ; the cost, rather than the beauty and elegance, was the test of excel- ency, and the object of admiration. The nobles were sur- sounded with hosts of parasites, or servants. ' You reckon up,' Chrysostom thus addresses a patrician, 'so many acres of land, ten or twenty palaces, as many baths, a thousand or two thousand slaves, chariots plated with silver or over- laid with gold.' "Their banquets were merely sumptuous, without social grace or elegance. The dress of the females, the fondness for false hair sometimes wrought up to an enormous height, and especially affecting the golden dye, and for paint, from which irresistible propensities they were not to be estranged even by religion, excite the stern animadversion of the ascetic Christian teacher. ' What business have rouge and paint on a Christian cheek ? Who can weep for her sins when her tears w r ash her face bare and mark furrows on her skin ? With what trust can faces be lifted up towards heaven, which the Maker cannot recognize as his own workmanship ? ' Their necks, heads, arms, and fingers were loaded with golden chains and rings ; their persons breathed precious odors ; their dresses were of gold stuff and silk : and in this attire they ventured to enter the church. 8 Quoted and translated by Milman, " History of Latin Christianity," book i, chap, ii, par. 20, note 1. VICES OF OLE ROY AND PEOPLE, 505 "Some of the wealthier Christian matrons gave a religious air to their vanity ; while the more profane wore their thin silken dresses embroidered with hunting pieces, wild beasts, or any other fanciful device, the more pious had the miracles of Christ, the marriage in Cana of Galilee, or the paralytic carrying his bed. In vain the preacher urged that it would be better to emulate these acts of charity and love, than to wear them on their garments. . . . The provincial cities, according to their natural character, imitated the old and new Rome ; and in all, no doubt, the nobility, or the higher order, were of the same character and habits." Milman. 9 As in the republic of old, in the train of wealth came luxury, and in the train of luxury came vice ; and as the violence now manifested in the election of the bishops was but a reproduction of the violence by which the tribunes and the consuls of the later republic were chosen, so the vices of these times were but a reproduction of the later republic and early empire not indeed manifested so coarsely and brutally ; more refined and polished, yet essentially the same iniquitous practice of shameful vice. Another phase of the evil : Under the law empowering the church to receive legacies, the^efforts of some of the clergy to persuade people, and especially women, to bestow their wealth upon the church, took precedence of every- thing else. " Some of the clergy made it the whole business and employment of their lives to learn the names of the ladies, to find out their habitations, to study their humor. One of these, an adept in the art, rises with the sun, settles the order of his visits, acquaints himself with the shortest ways, and almost breaks into the rooms of the women before they are awake. If he sees any curious piece of household furniture, he extols, admires, and handles it ; and, sighing that he too should stand in need of such trifles, in the end rather extorts it by force than obtains it by good-will, the ladies being 8 "History of Christianity," book iv, chap, i, par. 12, 13, 15. 506 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. afraid to disoblige the prating old fellow that is always running about from house to house." Jerome. Because of the insatiable avarice of the Roman clergy, and because of the shameful corruption that was practiced with the means thus acquired, a law was enacted, A. D. 3TO, by Valentinian I, forbidding any ecclesiastics to receive any inheritance, donation, or legacy from anybody ; and to let the world know that he did not complain of this hardship, the great bishop of Milan exclaimed : "We are excluded by laws lately enacted from all inheritances, donations, and legacies; yet we do not complain. And why should we? By such laws we only lose wealth ; and the loss of wealth is no loss to us. Estates are lawfully bequeathed to the min- isters of the heathen temples ; no layman is excluded, let his condition be ever so low, let his life be ever so scandal- ous : clerks alone are debarred from a right common to the rest of mankind. Let a Christian widow bequeath her whole estate to a pagan priest, her will is good in law ; let her bequeath the least share of it to a minister of God, her will is null. I do not mention these things by way of complaint, but only to let the world know that I do not complain." Ambrose. n The fact that such^ a law as this had to be enacted a law applying only to the clergy furnishes decisive proof that the ecclesiastics were more vicious and more corrupt in their use of wealth than was any other class in the empire. This in fact is plainly stated by another who was present at the time : "I am ashamed to say it, the priests of the idols, the stage-players, charioteers, whores, are capable of inher- iting estates, and receiving legacies ; from this common privilege, clerks alone, and monks, are debarred by law ; debarred not under persecuting tyrants, but Christian princes. " Jerome. 12 Nor was this all. The same pagan rites and heathen superstitions and practices, which were brought into the 10 Quoted by Bower, " History of the Popes," Damasus, par. 12. 11 Id. Two REPUBLICS. 39 This is a combination sun piece. The central object is Mithra in a cavern, sac- rificing a bull. Mithra was the sun, the bull was the symbol of the powers of night. The blood of the bull is to impart the power of regeneration. At the right hand be- low is the Genius of the Night, with his torch extinguished. At the left is the Genius of the Day, with his torch aflame. Above, in the middle, is the earth, with its pro- ductions. At the left is Apollo in his chariot, drawn by four horses, in this place representing the rising sun ; while at the right is Aurora, the goddess of the morning, disappearing before the brightness of the coming ApoDo. The inscription on the body of the bull is : "To Mithra, the invincible Sun-God." This sacrifice was made at the winter solstice, what is now Christmastime. The whole combination-piece is intended to represent the victory of the sun, the god of the day, over the powers of darkness, or of night. The original was in a vault at Rome under the capitol, and is now in the Louvre, Paris. MITHRA SACRIFICING THE BULL. ABOMINATIONS OF SUN WORSHIP CONTINUED. 507 church when the Catholic religion became that of the em- pire, not only still prevailed, but were enlarged. The cele- bration of the rites of the mysteries still continued, only with a more decided pagan character, as time went on, and as the number of pagans multiplied in the church. To add to their impressiveness, the mysteries in the church, as in the original Eleusinia, were celebrated in the night. As the catechumen came to the baptismal font, he "turned to the West, the realm of Satan, and thrice renounced his power ; he turned to the East to adore the Sun of Righteousness, and to proclaim his compact with the Lord of Life." Milman. 13 About the middle of the fourth century there was added another form and element of sun worship. Amongst the pagans for ages, December 25 had been celebrated as the birthday of the sun. In the reigns of Domitian and Trajan, Rome formally adopted from Persia the feast of the Persian sun-god, Mithras, as the Mrth festival of the unconquered sun Natales invicti Solis. The Church of Rome adopted this festival, and made it the birthday of Christ. And within a few years the celebration of this festival of the sun had spread throughout the whole empire east and west ; the perverse-minded bishops readily sanctioning it with the argument that the pagan festival of the birth of the real sun, was a type of the festival of the birth of Christ, the Sun of Righteousness. Thus was established the church festival of Christmas." This custom, like the forms of sun worship the day of the sun, worshiping toward the East, and the mysteries which had already been adopted, was so closely followed that it was actually brought " as a charge against the Chris- tians of the Catholic Church that they celebrated the Solstitia 13 "History of Christianity," book Iv, chap, ii, par. 8. " Schaff's " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 77, par. 3, 4, and the notes ; Gibbon's " Decline and Fall," chap, xxii, par. 8, note. Neander's " His- tory of the Christian Religion and Church," Section Third, part ii, div. iii, par. 21-23, and the notes. 508 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. with the pagans." Weander. 15 The worship of the sun itself was also still practiced. Pope Leo I testifies that in his time many Catholics had retained the pagan custom of paying "obeisance from some lofty eminence to the sun." And that they also " first worshipped the rising sun, paying homage to the pagan Apollo, before repairing to the Basilica of St. Peter." Schaff. The images and pictures which had formerly represented the sun were adopted and transformed into representations of Christ. How easily this was accomplished can be dis- cerned by an examination of the accompanying illustration. And such was the origin of the ' ' pictures of Christ " ; and especially of the nimbus or halo round the heads of them. The martyrs, whether real or imaginary, were now hon- ored in the place of the heathen heroes. The day of their martyrdom was celebrated as their birthday, and these cele- brations were conducted in the same way that the heathen celebrated the festival days of their heroes. "The festivals in honor of the martyrs were avowedly instituted, or at least conducted, on a sumptuous scale in rivalry of the banquets which formed so important and attractive a part of the pagan ceremonial. Besides the earliest Agapse, which gave place to the more solemn Eucharist, there were other kinds of banquets, at marriages and funerals, called likewise Agapse. " Mil/man. 1T These festivals were celebrated either at the sepulchers of the martyrs or at the churches, and the day began with hymns ; the history or fables of their lives and martyrdom was given; and eulogies were pronounced. "The day closed with an open banquet in which all the worshipers were invited to partake. The wealthy heathen had been accustomed to propitiate the manes of their departed friends by these costly festivals ; the banquet was almost an integral part of the heathen religious ceremony. The custom passed into the church ; and with the pagan feeling, the festival 15 Id. 16 " History of the Christian Church," \ 74, par. 4. 17 " History of Christianity," par. 14. O < S5-3 ? S" 2 S. - M iii^i> als-^ i-|Sj?j D" J a' S' b B* o o j* P 5 a> *"^ j ^'.Tn w, B^-> ,. y? rv.f ?^"^swr ^ V - " ^ '" ' : 'Ml. S7~ f ' \j I fc-' .U ^^^^iW^4 & ^V^^L ^^rii*e^^.. ^..:. &;Aa^i^.M\^.-^:.;Xq- o o a N_h2 Egego^g O3 ^ ^ 3, P r ^ ^S.S'S'* 5- "2. B O ip P* Pi5';i a, 2. s to &&*j HEATHEN PRACTICES IN THE CHURCH. 509 assumed a pagan character of gayety and joyous excitement, and even of luxury. In some places the confluence of worshipers was so great that, as in the earlier and indeed the more modern religions of Asia, the neighborhood of the more celebrated churches of the martyrs became marts for commerce, and fairs were established on those holidays. "As the evening drew in, the solemn and religious thoughts gave way to other emotions ; the wine flowed freely, and the healths of the martyrs were pledged, not unfrequently, to complete inebriety. All the luxuries of the Roman banquet were imperceptibly introduced. Dances were admitted, pantomimic spectacles were exhibited, the festivals were prolonged till late in the evening, or to mid- night, so that other criminal irregularities profaned, if not the sacred edifice, its immediate neighborhood. The bishops had for some time sanctioned these pious hilarities with their presence; they had freely partaken of the banquets." Milman. 1 * So perfectly were the pagan practices duplicated in these festivals of the martyrs, that the Catholics were charged with practicing pagan rites, with the only difference that they did it apart from the pagans. This charge was made to Augustine: "You have substituted your Agapse for the sacrifices of the pagans ; for their idols your martyrs, whom you serve with the very same honors. You appease the shades of the dead with wines and feasts : you celebrate the solemn festivals of the Gentiles, their calends and their solstices ; and as to their manners, those you have retained without any alteration. Nothing distinguishes you from the pagans except that you hold your assemblies apart from them." Draper. 19 And the only defense that Augustine could make was in a blundering casuistical effort to show a distinction in the nature of the two forms of worship. In the burial of their dead, they still continued the pagan practice of putting a piece of money in the mouth of the 18 Id., par. 15, 16. 19 " Intellectual Development of Europe," Vol. i, chap, x, par. 5. 510 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. corpse with which the departed was to pay the charges of Charon for ferrying him over the River Styx. 20 Another most prolific source of general corruption was the church's assumption of authority to regulate, and that by law, the whole question of the marriage relation, both in the Church and in the State. "The first aggression . . . which the Church made on the State, was assuming the cognizance over all questions and causes relating to mar- riage. " Milma/n,.* 1 Among the clergy she attempted to enforce celibacy, that is, to prohibit marriage altogether. Monkery had arisen to a perfect delirium of popularity, and " a character- istic trait of monasticism in all its forms is a morbid aversion to female society, and a rude contempt of married life. . . . Among the rules of Basil is a prohibition of speaking with a woman, touching one, or even looking on one, except in unavoidable cases." Schaff. As monkery was so uni- versally and so extremely popular among all classes from the height of imperial dignity to the depths of the monkish degradation itself, it became necessary for the clergy to imitate the monks in order to maintain popularity with the people. And as monkery is only an ostentatious display of self-righteousness, the contempt of married life was the easiest way for the clergy to advertise most loudly their imitation of monkish virtue. In their self-righteousness some of the monks attained to such a "pre-eminence" of "virtue" that they could live promiscuously with women, or like Jerome, write "letters to a virgin," that were unfit to be written to a harlot. The former class, in the estimation of an admirer, "bore away the pre-eminence from all others. " His account of them is as follows : " There are persons who, when by virtue they have attained to a condition exempt from passion, return to the world. In the midst of the 20 Milmatfs "History of Christianity," book iv, chap, ii, par. 13, note. ai Id., book iv, chap. 1, par. 58. 28 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 32, par. 15. MONKISH VIRTUE MADE PREVALENT. 5H stir, by plainly intimating that they are indifferent to those who view them with amazement, they thus trample underfoot vain-glory, the last garment, according to the wise Plato, which it is the nature of the soul to cast off. By similar means they study the art of apathy in eating, practising it even, if need be, with the petty retailers of victuals. They also constantly frequent the public baths, mostly mingling and bathing with women, since they have attained to such au ascendency over their passions, as to possess dominion over nature, and neither by s^ght, touch, or even embracing of the female, to relapse into their natural condition ; it being their desire to be men among men, and women among women, and to participate in both sexes. In short, by a life thus all excellent and divine, virtue exercises a sovereignty in opposition to nature, estab- lishing her own laws, so as not to allow them to partake to satiety in any necessary. " Evagrius. 23 The first decretal ever issued, namely, that by Pope Siri- cius, A. D. 385, commanded the married clergy to separate from their wives under sentence of expulsion from the cler- ical order upon all who dared to offer resistance ; yet promis- ing pardon for such as had offended through ignorance, and suffering them to retain their positions, provided they would observe complete separation from their wives though even then they were to be held forever incapable of promo- tion. The clergy finding themselves forbidden by the pope to marry, and finding it necessary, in order to maintain a standing of popularity, to imitate the monks, practiced the same sort of monkish " virtue " as described above. "The clerks who ought to instruct and awe the women with a grave and composed behavior, first kiss their heads, and then stretching out their hands as it were to bestow a blessing, slyly receive a fee for their salutation. The women in the meantime, elated with pride in feeling themselves thus courted by the clergy, prefer tJ^ freedom of widowJiood to the subjection attending the state of matrimony."' Jerome As these associations differed from those in real matri- mony "only in the absence of the marriage ceremony," it was not an uncommon thing for men to gain admission to "holy orders" "on account of the superior opportunities zs " Ecclesiastical History," book i, chap. xxi. z *Quoied by Bower, " History of the Popes," Damasus, par. 1*3. 512 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. which clericature gave of improper intercourse with women. " This practice became so scandalous that in A. D. 370 Yalen- tian I enacted a law "which denounced severe punishment on ecclesiastics who visited the houses of widows and vir- gins." Lea.*~ a The law, however, had really no effect in stopping the wickedness, and "with the disappearance of legitimate marriage in the priesthood, the already prevalent vice of the cohabitation of unmarried ecclesiastics with pious widows and virgins 'secretly brought in,' became more and more common. This spiritual marriage which had become as a bold ascetic venture, ended only too often in the flesh, and prostituted the honor of the church." Schaff Again : in accordance with the rest of the theocratical legislation of Constantine and the bishops, the precepts of the Scripture in relation to marriage and divorce were adopted with heavy penalties, as the laws of the empire. As the church had assumed "cognizance over all questions relating to marriage," it followed that marriage not cele- brated by the church was held to be but little better than an illicit connection. Yet the weddings of the church were celebrated in the pagan way. Loose hymns were sung to Yenus, and " the bride was borne by drunken men to her husband's house among choirs of dancing harlots with pipes, and flutes, and songs of offensive license." And when the marriage had been thus celebrated, and even consummated, the marriage bond was held so loosely that it amounted to very little, for "men changed their wives as quickly as their clothes, and marriage chambers were set up as easily as booths in a market." Milman. 21 Of course there were against all these evils, laws abun- dant with penalties terrible, as in the days of the Caesars. And also as in those days the laws were utterly impotent : not only for the same great reason that then existed, that the iniquity was so prevalent that there were none to enforce 25 "History of Sacerdotal Celibacy," chap, v, par. 17, and chap, iv, par. 7. 26 " History of the Christian Church," Vol. iii, 50, par. 8. 27 "History of Christianity," book iv. chap, i, par. 58, note^ and 60. HYPOCRISY AND FRAUD MADE HABITUAL. 513 the laws ; but for an additional reason that now existed, that is, tJie bishops were the interpreters of the code, and by this time through the interminable and hair-splitting distinctions drawn against heresies, the bishops had so sharpened their powers of interpretation that they could easily evade the force of any law, scriptural, canonical, or statutory that might be produced. There is yet one other element of general corruption to be noticed. As we have seen, the means employed by Constantine in establishing the Catholic religion and church, and in making that the prevalent religion, were such as to win only hypocrites. This was bad enough in itself, yet the hypocrisy was voluntary ; but when through the agency of her Sunday laws and by the ministration of Theodosius the church received control of the civil power to compel all without distinction who were not Catholics to act as though they were, hypocrisy was made compulsory ; and every per- son who was not voluntarily a church-member was compelled either to be a hypocrite or a rebel. In addition to this, those who were of the church indeed, through the endless succession of controversies and church councils, were forever establishing, changing, and re-establishing the faith, and as all were required to change or revise their faith according as the councils decreed, all moral and spiritual integrity was destroyed. Hypocrisy became a habit, dissimulation and fraud a necessity of life, and the very moral fiber of men and of society was vitiated. In the then existing order of things it was impossible that it could be otherwise. Right faith is essential to right morals. Purity of faith is essential to purity of heart and life. But there the faith was wrong and utterly corrupt, and nothing but corruption could follow. More than this, the faith was essentially pagan, and much more guilty than had been the original pagan, as it was professed under the name of Christianity and the gospel, and as it was in itself a shameful corruption of the true faith of the gospel. As the faith of the people was essentially pagan, or rather worse, 514 THE RUIN OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. the morality of the people could be nothing else. And such in fact it was. " There is ample evidence to show how great had been the reaction from the simple genuineness of early Christian belief, and how nearly the Christian world had generally associated itself, in thought and temper, not to say in su- perstitious practice, with the pagan. We must not shut our eyes to the fact that much of the apparent success of the new religion had been gained by its actual accommodation of itself to the ways and feelings of the old. It was natural it should be so. Once set aside, from doubt, distaste, >r any other feeling, the special dogmas of the gospel, . . . and men will naturally turn to compromise, to electicism, to universalism, to indifference, to unbelief. . . . ' ' If the great Christian doctors had themselves come forth from the schools of the pagans, the loss had not been wholly unrequited ; so complacently had even Christian doctors again surrendered themselves to the fascinations of pagan speculations ; so fatally, in their behalf, had they extenuated Christian dogma, and acknowledged the fundamental truth and sufficiency of science falsely so called. "The gospel we find was almost eaten out from the heart of the Christian society. I speak not now of the pride of spiritual pretensions, of the corruption of its secular politics, of its ascetic extravagances, its mystical fallacies, of its hollowness in preaching, or its laxity in practice ; of its saint worship, which was a revival of hero-worship ; its addiction to the sensuous in outward service, which was a revival of idolatry. But I point to the fact less observed by our church historians, of the absolute defect of all distinctive Christianity in the utterances of men of the highest esteem as Christians, men of reputed wisdom, sentiment, and devo- tion. Look, for instance, at the remains we possess of the Christian Boethius, a man whom we know to have been a professed Christian and churchman, excellent in action, steadfast in suffering, but in whose writings, in which he PURE, UNMINGLED NATURALISM. 515 aspires to set before us the true grounds of spiritual con- solation on which he rested himself in the hour of his trial, and on which he would have his fellows rest, there is no trace of Christianity whatever, nothing but pure, unmingled naturalism. "This marked decline of distinctive Christian belief was accompanied with a marked decline of Christian morality. Heathenism re-asserted its empire over the carnal affections of the natural man. The pictures of abounding wickedness in the high places and the lew places of the earth, which are presented to us by the witnesses of the worst pagan deg- radation, are repeated, in colors not less strong, in lines not less hideous, by the observers of the gross and reckless iniquity of the so-called Christian period now before us. It becomes evident that as the great mass of the careless and indifferent have assumed witli the establishment of the Chris- tian church in authority and honor, the outward garb and profession of Christian believers, so with the decline of belief, the corruption of the visible church, the same masses, indifferent and irreligious as of old, have rejected the moral restraints which their profession should have imposed upon them. Merivale. In short, the same corruptions that had characterized the former Home were reproduced in the Rome of the fifth cent- ury. "The primitive rigor of discipline and manners was utterly neglected and forgotten by the ecclesiastics of Rome. The most exhorbitant luxury, with all the vices attending it, was introduced among them, and the most scandalous and unchristian arts of acquiring wealth universally practiced. They seem to have rivaled in riotous living the greatest epi- cures of Pagan Rome when luxury was there at the highest pitch. For Jerome, who was an eye witness of what he writ, reproaches the Roman clergy with the same excesses which the poet Juvenal so severely censured in the Roman nobility under the reign of Domitian." Bower. 28 " Conversion of the Northern Nations," Lecture iv, par. 10, 12, 13. 39 41 History of the Popes," Damasus, par. 14. 516 THE RUIN OF TIIE ROMAN EMPIRE. The following quotation, though touching upon some points already made, gives others of sufficient value to justify its insertion: "The mass of professing believers were found to relapse into the grossest superstitions and practices of the heathen. . . . The old heathen cultus, par- ticularly that of the sun ( Sol invictus ), had formerly en- twined itself with the Christian worship of God. Many Christians, before entering the Basilica of Peter, were wont to mount the platform, in order to make their obeisance to the rising luminary. Here was an instance of the way in which the 'spirit of paganism,' had found means of in- sinuating itself into the very heart of Christianity. Leo could say, with no great exaggeration, in looking at the moral position of the Roman Christians, ' Quod temporibus nostris auctore diabolo sic vitiata sunt omnia, ut fere nihil sit quod absque idololatria transigatur ' [ In our time, by the instigation of the devil, all things have become so corrupt that there is hardly anything that is done without idolatry]. The weddings of the Christians could not be distinguished from those of the pagans. Everything was determined by auguries and auspices ; the wild orgies of the "Bacchanalians, with all their obscene songs and revelry, were not wanting." Merivale. And now all the evils engendered in that evil intrigue which united the State with a professed Christianity, hur- ried on the doomed empire to its final and utter ruin. "The criminal and frivolous pleasures of a decrepit civiliza- tion left no thought for the absorbing duties of the day or the fearful trials of the morrow. Unbridled lust and unblush- ing indecency admitted no sanctity in the marriage tie. The rich and powerful established harems, in the recesses of which their wives lingered, forgotten, neglected, and de- spised. The banquet, theater, and the circus exhausted what little strength and energy were left by domestic ex- cesses. The poor aped the vices of the rich, and hideous 30 "Conversion of the Northern Nations," notes and illustrations, E. DESTRUCTION AND DEVASTATION. 517" depravity reigned supreme, and invited the vengeance of heaven. Lea. 31 The pagan superstitions, the pagan delusions, and the pagan vices, which had been brought into the church by the apostasy, and clothed with a form of godliness, had wrought such corruption that the society of which it was a part could no longer exist. From it no more good could possibly come, and it must be swept away. "The uncon- trollable progress of avarice, prodigality, voluptuousness, theater going, intemperance, lewdness ; in short, of all the heathen vices, which Christianity had come . to eradicate, still carried the Koman empire and people with rapid strides toward dissolution, and gave it at last into the hands of the rude, but simple and morally vigorous, barbarians." Schaff. And onward those barbarians came, swiftly and in multi- tudes. For a hundred years the dark cloud had been hang- ing threateningly over the borders of the empire, encroach- ing slightly upon the West and breaking occasionally upon the East. But at the close of the fourth century the tem- pest burst in all its fury, and the flood was flowing ruin- ously. As early as A. D. 377 a million Goths had crossed the Danube, and between that time and A. D. 400 they had ravaged the country from Thessalonica to the Adriatic Sea. In A. D. 400 a host of them entered the borders of Italy, but were restrained for a season. In 406 a band of Burgundians, Vandals, Suevi, and Alani from the north of Germany, four hundred thousand strong, overran the country as far as Florence. In the siege of that city their course was checked with the loss of more than one hundred thousand. They then returned to Germany, and with large accessions to their numbers, over- ran all the southern part of Gaul. The Burgundians re- mained in Gaul ; the Vandals, the Alani, and the Suevi 31 "History of Sacerdotal Celibacy," chap. v. par. 20. 32 "History of the Christian Church," Vol. 3, 23, par. 2. 518 THE RUIN OF TUB ROMAN EMPIRE. overran all the southern part of Spain, and carried their ravages over the greater part of that province, and clear to the Strait of Gibraltar. In 410 again returned the mighty hosts of the Goths, and spread over all Italy from the Alps to the Strait of Sicily, and for five days inflicted upon Rome such pillage as had never befallen it since the day, nearly a thousand years before, when the Cimbri left it in ruins. They marched out of Italy and took possession of Southwestern Gaul from the Mediterranean Sea to the Bay of Biscay. In May 429, the Vandals, in whose numbers the Alani had been absorbed, crossed the Strait of Gibraltar' into Africa, and for ten years ravaged the country from there to Carthage, of which city they took possession with great slaughter, October 9, A. D. 439 ; and in 440 the terrible Genseric, king of the Vandals, ruled the Mediterranean and sacked the city of Rome. In 449 the Saxons and their German neighbors invaded Britain, of which they soon became sole possessors, utterly exterminating the native inhabitants. In 451-3 another mighty host, numbering seven hundred thousand, of all the barbarous nations, led by Attila, deso- lated Eastern Gaul as far as Chalons, and the north of Italy as far as the Rhone, but returned again beyond the Danube. And finally, in 476, when Odoacer, king of the Heruli, became king of Italy, the last vestige of the Western empire of Rome was gone, and was divided among the ten nations of barbarians of the North. Wherever these savages went, they carried fire and slaughter, and whenever they departed, they left desolation and ruin in their track, and carried away multitudes of cap- tives. Thus was the proud empire of Western Rome swept from the earth ; and that which Constantino and his ecclesi- astical flatterers had promised one another should be the everlasting salvation of the State, proved its speedy and everlasting ruin. NO REMEDY, AND FINAL RUIN. 519 It was impossible that it should be otherwise. We have seen to what a fearful depth of degradation Pagan Rome had gone in the days of the Caesars, yet the empire did not perish then. There was hope for the people. The gospel of Jesus Christ carried in earnestness, in simplicity, and in its heavenly power, brought multitudes to its saving light, and to a knowledge of the purity of Jesus Christ. This was their salvation ; and the gospel of Christ, by restoring the virtue and integrity of the individual, was the preservation of the Roman State. But when by apostasy that gospel had lost its purity and its power in the multitudes who professed it ; and when it was used only as a cloak to cover the same old pagan wick- edness ; when this form of godliness, practiced not only without the power but in defiance of it, permeated the great masses of the people, and the empire had thereby become a festering mass of corruption ; when the only means which it was possible for the Lord himself to employ to purify the people, had been taken and made only the cloak under which to increase unto more ungodliness, there was no other remedy : destruction must come. And it did come, as we have seen, by a host wild and savage, it is true ; but whose social habits were so far above those of the people which they destroyed, that savage as they were, they were caused fairly to blush at the shameful corruptions which they found in this so-called Christian society of Rome. This is proved by the best authority. A writer who lived at the time of the barbarian invasions and who wrote as a Christian, gives the following evidence as to the condition of things : " ' The church which ought everywhere to propitiate God, what does she, but provoke him to anger ? How many may one meet, even in the church, who are not still drunkards, or debauchees, or adulterers, or fornicators, or robbers, or murderers, or the like, or all these at once, without end ? It is even a sort of holiness among Christian people, to be less vicious.' From the public worship of God. and almost during it, 4O 520 THE FALL OF THE EMPIRE. they pass to deeds of shame. Scarce a rich man but would commit mur- der and fornication. We have lost the whole power of Christianity, and offend God the more, that we sin as Christians. We are worse than the barbarians and heathen. If the Saxon is wild, the Frank faithless, the Goth inhuman, the Alanian drunken, the Hun licentious, they are, by reason of their ignorance, far less punishable than we, who, knowing the commandments of God, commit all these crimes." SalDian. 33 ' ' He compares the Christians, especially of Rome, with the Arian Goths and Yandals, to the disparagement of the Romans, who add to the gross sins of nature the refined vices of civilization, passion for the theaters, debauchery, and unnatural lewdness. Therefore has the just God given them into the hands of the barbarians, and exposed them to the ravages of the migrating hordes."- Scliaff.^ And this description, says the same author, "is in gen- eral not untrue.'' 1 And he confirms it in his own words by the excellent observation that "nothing but the divine judg- ment of destruction upon this nominally Christian, but essen- tially heathen, world, could open the way for the moral regeneration of society. There must be new, fresh nations, if the Christian civilization, prepared in the old Roman em- pire, was to take firm root and bear ripe fruit." Schaff These new, fresh nations came, and planted themselves upon the ruins of the old. Out of these came the faithful Christians of the Dark Ages, and upon them broke the light of the Reformation. And out of these and by this means God produced the civilization of the nineteenth century and the new republic of the United States of America^ from which there should go once more in its purity, as in the beginning, the everlasting gospel to every nation and kindred and tongue and people. 33 Quoted by Schafl, Id., \ 12, par. 3. 35 Id. \ 24, par. 2. 3* Id. CHAPTER XXII. THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. AS out of the political difficulties of the days of Constan- tino, the Catholic Church rose to power in the State ; so out of the ruin of the Roman empire she rose to supremacy over kings and nations. She had speedily wrought the ruin of one empire, and now for more than a thousand years she would prove a living curse to all the States and empires that should succeed it. We have seen how that, by the arrogant ministry of Leo, the bishop of Rome was made the fountain of faith, and was elevated to a position of dignity and authority that the aspir- ing prelacy had never before attained. For Leo, as the typ- ical pope, was one whose " ambition knew no bounds ; and to gratify it, he stuck at nothing ; made no distinction be- tween right and wrong, between truth and falsehood ; as if he had adopted the famous maxim of Julius Caesar, Be just, unless a kingdom tempts to break the laws, For sovereign power alone can justify the cause,' or thought the most criminal actions ceased to be criminal, and became meritorious, when any ways subservient to the increase of his power or the exaltation of his see." Bower. 1 Nor was the force of any single point of his example ever lost upon his successors. His immediate successor, HILARY, 4(51-467, was so glad to occupy the place which had been made so large by Leo, that shortly after his election he wrote a letter lu History of the Popes," Leo, last par. but one. [521] 522 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. to the other bishops asking them to exult with him, taking particular care in the letter to tell them that he did not doubt that they all knew what respect and deference was paid "in the Spirit of God to St. Peter and his see." The bishops of Spain addressed him as "the successor of St. Peter, whose primacy ought to be loved and feared by all." He was succeeded by SIMPLICIUS, 467-4:83, in whose pontificate the empire perished when the Heruli, under Odoacer, overran all Italy, deposed the last emperor of the "West, appropriated to themselves one third of all the lands, and established the Herulian kingdom, with Odoacer as king of Italy. In fact, the more the imperial power faded, and the nearer the empire approached its fall, the more rapidly and the stronger grew the papal assumptions. Thus the very calamities which rapidly wrought the ruin of the empire, and which were hastened by the union of Church and State, were turned to the advantage of the bishopric of Rome. During the whole period of barbarian invasions from 400 to 476, the Catholic hierarchy everywhere adapted itself to the situation, and reaped power and influence from the calamities that were visited everywhere. We have seen that Innocent I, upon whose mind there appears first to have dawned the vast conception of Rome's universal ecclesiastical supremacy, during the invasion of Italy and the siege of Rome by Alaric, headed an embassy to the emperer to mediate for a treaty of peace between the empire and the invading Goths. 'We have seen that at the moment of Leo's election to the papal see, he was absent on a like mission to reconcile the enmity of the two principal Roman officers, which was threatening the safety of the empire. Yet other and far more important occasions of the same kind fell to the lot of Leo during the term of his bish- opric. In 453 Leo was made the head of an embassy to meet Attila as he was on his way to Rome, if possible to THE PAPACY AND THE BARBARIANS. 523 turn him back. The embassy was successful ; a treaty was formed ; Attila retired beyond the Danube, where he imme- diately died ; and Italy was delivered. This redounded no less to the glory of Leo than any of the other remarkable things which he had accomplished. He was not so suc- cessful with Genseric two years afterward, yet even then he succeeded in mitigating the ravages of the Yandals, which were usually so dreadful that the idea still lives in the word "vandalism." Moreover, it was not against religion as such that the barbarians made war, as they themselves were religious. It was against that mighty empire of which they had seen much, and suffered much, and heard more, that they warred. It was as nations taking vengeance upon a nation which had been so great, arid which had so proudly asserted lordship over all other nations, that they invaded the Roman empire. And when they could plant themselves and remain, as absolute lords, in the dominions of those who had boasted of absolute and eternal dominion, and thus humble the pride of the mighty Rome, this was their supreme gratification. As these invasions were not inflicted everywhere at once, but at intervals through a period of seventy-five years, the church had ample time to adapt herself to the ways of such of the barbarians as were heathen, which as ever she readily did. The heathen barbarians were accustomed to pay the greatest respect to their own priesthood, and were willing to admit the Catholic priesthood to an equal or even a larger place in their estimation. Such of them as were already professedly Christian, were Arians, and not so savage as the Catholics ; therefore, they, with the excep- tion of the Yandals, were not so ready to persecute, and were willing to settle and make themselves homes in the territories of the vanished empire. An account of the conversion of the Burgundians, and through them of the Franks, will illustrate the dealings of the papacy with the barbarians, and will also give the key 524 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. to the most important events in the history of the supremacy of the bishopric of Rome. Ever since the time of Constantine, the god and saviour of the Catholics had been a god of battle, and no surer way to the eternal rewards of martyrdom could be taken than by being killed in a riot in behalf of the orthodox faith, or to die by punishment inflicted for such proceeding, as in the case of that insolent ruffian who attempted to murder Orestes. It was easy, therefore, for the heathen barbarians, whose greatest god was the god of battle, and whose greatest victory and surest passport to the halls of the warrior god, was to die in the midst of the carnage of bloody battle, it was easy for such people as this to become converted to the god of battle of the Catholics. A single bloody victory would turn the scale, and issue in the conversion of a whole nation. The Burgundians were settled in that part of Gaul which now forms Western Switzerland and that part of France which is now the county and district of Burgundy. As early as A. D. 430, the Huns making inroads into Gaul, severely afflicted the Burgundians, who finding impotent the power of their own god, determined to try the Catholic god. They therefore sent representatives to a' neighboring city in Gaul, requesting the Catholic bishop to receive them. The bishop had them fast for a week, during which time he cate- chised them, and then baptized them. Soon afterward the Burgundians found the Huns without a leader, and, sud- denly falling upon them at the disadvantage, confirmed their conversion by the slaughter of ten thousand of the enemy. Thereupon the w r hole nation embraced the Catholic religion "with fiery zeal." JMfilman.* Afterward, however, when about the fall of the empire, the Visigoths under Euric as- serted their dominion over all Spain, and the greater part of Gaul, and over the Burgundians too, they deserted the Catholic god, and adopted the Arian faith. 2 "History of Latiu Christiauty," book ii, chap, ii, par. 21 ; Socrates's "Ecclesiastical History," book vii, chap. xxx. THE "CONVERSION" OF CLOVI8. 525 Yet Clotilda, a niece of the Burgundian king, "was edu- cated " in the profession of the Catholic faith. She married Clovis, the pagan king of the pagan Franks, and strongly persuaded him to become a Catholic. All her pleadings were in vain, however, till A. D. 496, when in a great battle with the Alemanni, the Franks were getting the worst of the conflict, in the midst of the battle Clovis vowed that if the victory could be theirs, he would become a Catholic. The tide of battle turned ; the victory was won, and Clovis was a Catholic. Clotilda hurried away a messenger with the glad news to the bishop of Rhiems, who came to baptize the new convert. But after the battle was over, and the dangerous crisis was past, Clovis was not certain whether he wanted to be a Catholic. He said he must consult his warriors ; he did so, and they signified their readiness to adopt the same religion as their king. He then declared that he was convinced of the truth of the Catholic faith, and preparations were at once made for the baptism of the new Constantine, Christ- mas day, A. D. 496. "To impress the minds of the barbari- ans, the baptismal ceremony was performed with the utmost pomp. The church was hung with embroidered tapestry and white curtains ; odors of incense like airs of paradise, were diffused around ; the building blazed with countless lights. When the new Constantine knelt in the font to be cleansed from the leprosy of his heathenism, 'Fierce Sicam- brian,'.said the bishop, ' bow thy neck ; burn what thou hast adored, adore what thou hast burned.' Three thousand Franks followed the example of Clovis." Milman. 3 The pope sent Clovis a letter congratulating him on his conversion. As an example of the real value of his relig- ious instruction, it may be well to state that some time after his baptism, the bishop delivered a sermon on the crucifixion of the Saviour ; and while he dwelt upon the cruelty of the Jew r s in that transaction, Clovis blurted out, "If I had been there with my faithful Franks, they would not have dared to 3 "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, ii, par. 27. 526 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. do it." "If unscrupulous ambition, undaunted valor and enterprise, and desolating warfare, had been legitimate means for the propagation of pure Christianity, it could not have found a better champion than Clovis. For the first time the diffusion of belief in the nature of the Godhead became the avowed pretext for the invasion of a neighboring territory." Milman,* "His ambitious reign was a per- petual violation of moral and Christian duties ; his hands were stained with blood in peace as well as in war ; and as soon as Clovis had dismissed a synod of the Gallican church, he calmly assassinated all the princes of the Mero- vingian race."-- Gibbon* The bishop of Yienne also sent a letter to the new con- vert, in which he prophesied that the faith of Clovis would be a surety of the victory of the Catholic faith ; and he, with every other Catholic in Christendom, was ready to do his utmost to see that the prophecy was fulfilled. The Catholics in all the neighboring countries longed and prayed and conspired that Clovis might deliver them from the rule of Arian monarchs ; and in the nature of the case, war soon followed. Burgundy was the first country invaded. Before the war actually began, however, by the advice of the bishop of Rhiems, a synod of the orthodox bishops met at Lyons ; then with the bishop of Yienne at their head, they visited the king of the Burgundians, and proposed that he call the Arian bishops together, and allow a conference to be held, as they were prepared to prove that the Arians were in error. To their proposal the king replied, " If yours" be the true doctrine, why do you not prevent the king of the Franks from waging an unjust war against me, and from caballing with my enemies against me? There is no true Christian faith where there is rapacious covetousness for the posses- sions of others, and thirst for blood. Let him show forth hi? faith by his good works." Milman* *Id. par. 28. 6 " Decline and Fall," chap, xxxviii, par. 6. 6 "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap. Li, par. 28. THE "HOLT" WARS OF CLOVIS. 527 The bishop of Vienne dodged this pointed question, and replied, "We are ignorant of the motives and intentions of the king of the Franks ; but we are taught by the Scripture that the kingdoms which abandon the divine law, are fre- quently subverted ; and that enemies will arise on every side against those who have made God their enemy. Eeturn with thy people to the law of God, and he will give peace and security to thy dominions."- - Gibbon. 7 War followed, and the Burgundian dominions were made subject to the rule of Clovis, A. D. 500. The Visigoths possessed all the southwestern portion of Gaul. They too were Arians ; and the mutual conspiracy of the Catholics in the Gothic dominions, and the crusade of the Franks from the side of Clovis, soon brought on another holy war. At the assembly of princes and warriors at Paris, A. D. 508, Clovis complained, "It grieves me to see that the Arians still possess the fairest portion of Gaul. Let us march against them with the aid of God ; and, hav- ing vanquished the heretics, we will possess and divide their fertile province." Clotilda added her pious exhortation to the effect "that doubtless the Lord would more readily lend his aid if some gift were made ; " and in response, Clovis seized his ba-ttle-ax and threw it as far as he could, and as it went whirling through the air, he exclaimed, "There, on that spot where my Francesca shall fall, will I erect a church in honor of the holy apostles." - Gibbon? War was declared ; and as Clovis marched on his way, he passed through Tours, and turned aside to consult the shrine of St. Martin of Tours, for an omen. "His messen- gers were instructed to remark the words of the Psalm which should happen to be chanted at the precise, moment when they entered the church." And the oracular clergy took care that the words which he should "happen " to hear at that moment uttered not in Latin, but in language which Clovis understood should be the following from 7 "Decline and Fall," chap, xxxviii, par. 8. 8 Id., par. 11. 528 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. Psalm xviii : "Thou hast girded me, O Lord, with strength unto the battle ; thou hast subdued unto me those who rose up against me. Thou hast given me the necks of mine enemies, that I might destroy them that hate me." The oracle was satisfactory, and in the event was completely successful. "The Visigothic kingdom was wasted and sub- dued by the remorseless sword of the Franks."-- Gibbon.* Nor was the religious zeal of Clovis confined to the over- throw of the Arians. There were two bodies of the Franks, the Salians arid the Ripuarians. Clovis was king of the Salians, Sigebert of the Ripuarians. Clovis determined to be king of all ; he therefore prompted the son of Sigebert to assassinate his father, with the promise that the son should peaceably succeed Sigebert on the throne ; but as soon as the murder was committed, Clovis commanded the murderer to be murdered, and then in a full parliament of the whole people of the Franks, he solemnly vowed that he had had nothing to do with the murder of either the father or the son ; and upon this, as there was no heir, Clovis was raised upon a shield, and proclaimed king of the RipUarian Franks ; all of which Gregory, bishop of Tours, commended as the will of God, saying of Clovis that "God thus daily pros- trated his enemies under his hands, and enlarged his king- dom, because he walked before him with an upright heart, and did that which was well pleasing in his sight." Milman. Thus was the bloody course of Clovis glorified, by the Catholic writers, as the triumph of the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity over Arianism. When such actions as these were so lauded by the clergy as the pious acts of orthodox Catholics', it is certain that the clergy themselves were no better than were the bloody objects of their praise. Under the influence of such ecclesiastics, the condition of the bar- 9 Id., par. 12, and Milman's " History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, ii, par. 29. 10 " History of Latin Christianity," Id., par. 29. SUCH CONVERSION WAS WORSE CORRUPTION. 529 barians after their so-called conversion, could not possibly be better, even if it were not worse than before. To be con- verted to the principles and precepts of such clergy was only the more deeply to be damned. In proof of this it is nec- essary only to touch upon the condition of Catholic France under Clovis and his successors. Into the "converted" barbarians, the Catholic system in- stilled all of its superstition, and its bigoted hatred of heretics and unbelievers. It thus destroyed what of gener- osity still remained in their minds, while it only intensified their native ferocity ; and the shameful licentiousness of the papal system likewise corrupted the purity, and the native respect for women and marriage which had always been a noble characteristic of the German nations. "It is difficult to conceive a more dark and odious state of society than that of France under her Merovingian kings, the descendants of Clovis, as described by Gregory of Tours. . . . Throughout, assassinations, parricides, and fratricides intermingle with adulteries and rapes. ' ' The cruelty might seem the mere inevitable result of this violent and unnatural fusion ; but the extent to which this cruelty spreads throughout the whole society almost surpasses belief. That king Chlotaire should burn alive his rebellious son with his wife and daughter, is fearful enough ; but we are astounded, even in these times, that a bishop of Tours should burn a man alive to obtain the deeds of an estate which he coveted. Fredegonde sends two murderers to assassinate Childebert, and these assassins are clerks. She causes the archbishop of Rouen to be murdered while he is chanting the service in the church ; and in this crime a bishop and an archdeacon are her accomplices. She is not content with open violence ; she administers poison with the subtlety of a Locusta or a modern Italian, apparently with no sensual design, but from sheer barbarity." "As to the intercourse of the sexes, wars of conquest, where the females are at the mercy of the victors, especially 530 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. if female virtue is not in much respect, would severely try the more rigid morals of the conqueror. The strength of the Teutonic character, when it had once burst the bonds of habitual or traditionary restraint, might seem to disdain easy and effeminate vice, and to seek a kind of wild zest in the indulgence of lust, by mingling it up with all other vio- lent passions, rapacity and inhumanity. Marriage was a bond contracted and broken on the slightest occasion. Some of the Merovingian kings took as many wives, either together or in succession, as suited either their passions or their politics." The papal religion "hardly interferes even to interdict incest. King Chlotaire demanded for the fisc the third part of the revenue of the churches ; some bishops yielded ; one, Injuriosus, disdainfully refused, and Chlotaire withdrew his demands. Yet Chlotaire, seemingly unrebuked, married two sisters at once. Charibert likewise married two sisters : he, however, found a churchman but that was Saint Germanus bold enough to rebuke him. This rebuke the king (the historian quietly writes), as he had already many wives, bore with patience. Dagobert, son of Chlotaire, king of Austrasia, repudiated his wife Gomatrude for barren- ness, married a Saxon slave Mathildis, then another, Regna- trude ; so that he had three wives at oilce, besides so many concubines that the chronicler is ashamed to recount them. Brunehaut and Fredegonde are not less famous for their licentiousness than for their cruelty. Fredegonde is either compelled, or scruples not of her own accord, to take a pub- lic oath, with three bishops and four hundred nobles as her vouchers, that her son was the son of her husband Chilperic. Milman. 11 Thus did the papacy for the barbarians whom she "converted;" and such as she could not thus cor- rupt, she destroyed. At the fall of the empire, the bishopric of Rome was the head and center of a strong and compactly organized power. And by deftly insinuating itself into the place of mediator 11 Id., par. 33, 34. SHE DESTROYS THOSE SHE CANNOT CORRUPT. 531 between the barbarian invaders and the perishing imperial authority, it had attained a position where it was recognized by the invaders as the power which, though it claimed to be not temporal but spiritual was none the less real, had suc- ceeded to the place of the vanished imperial authority of Rome. And in view of the history of the time, it is impos- sible to escape the conviction that in the bishopric of Rome there was at this time formed the determination to plant itself in the temporal dominion of Rome and Italy. The emperors had been absent from Rome so long that the bishop of Rome had assumed their place there, and we have seen how the church had usurped the place of the civil authority. The bishop of Rome was the head of the church ; and now, as the empire was perishing, he would exalt his throne upon its ruins, and out of the anarchy of the times would secure a place and a name among the pow- ers and dominions of the earth. The barbarians who took possession of Italy were Arians, which in the sight of the bishop of Rome was worse than all other crimes put together. In addition to this, the Herulian monarch, Odoacer, an Arian, presumed to assert civil authority over the papacy, which, on account of the riotous proceedings in the election of the pope, was necessary, but would not meekly be borne by the proud pontiffs. At the election of the first pope after the fall of the empire, the representative of Odoacer appeared and notified the assembly that without his direction nothing ought to be done, that all they had done was null and void, that the election must be- gin anew, and "that it belonged to the civil magistrate to prevent the disturbances that might arise on such occasions, lest from the church they should pass to the State." And as these elections were carried not only by violence, but by bribery, in which the property of the church played an im- portant part, Odoacer, by his lieutenant at this same assem- bly, A. D. 483, "caused a law to be read, forbidding the bishop who should now be chosen, as well as his successors, 532 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. to alienate any inheritance, possessions, or sacred utensils that now belonged, or should for the future belong, to the church ; declaring all such bargains void, anathematizing both the seller and the buyer, and obliging the latter and his heirs to restore to the church all lands and tenements thus purchased, how long soever they might have possessed them. " Bower. 12 By the law of Oonstantine which bestowed upon the church the privilege of receiving donations, legacies, etc., by will, lands were included ; and through nearly two hun- dred years of the workings of this law, the church of Rome had become enormously enriched in landed estates. And more especially ' ' since the extinction of the Western empire had emancipated the ecclesiastical potentate from secular control, the first and most abiding object of his schemes and prayers had been the acquisition of territorial wealth in the neighborhood of his capital. " Bryce. 13 The church of Rome had also other lands, scattered in different parts of Italy, and even in Asia, for Celestine I addressed to Theodosius II a request that he extend his imperial protection over certain estates in Asia, which a woman named Proba had bequeathed to the Church of Rome. As the imperial power faded away in the West, the bishop of Rome, in his growing power, came more and more to assert his own power of protection over his lands in Italy. And when the imperial power was entirely gone, it was naturally held that this power fell absolutely to him. When, therefore, Odoacer, both a barbarian invader and a heretic, issued a decree forbidding the alienation of church lands and possessions, this was represented as a presumptuous invasion of the rights of the bishop of Rome, not only to do what he would with his own, but above all as protector of the property and estates of the church. For this offense of Odoacer, there was no forgiveness by the bishop of Rome. Nothing short of the utter uprooting 12 " History of the Popes," Felix II, par. 1. 13 " The Holy Roman Empire," chap, iv, par. 7. DESTRUCTION OF TEE HERULIAN KINGDOM. 533 of the Herulian power could atone for it. The Catholic ecclesiastics of Italy began to plot for his overthrow, and it was so6n accomplished. There were at that time in the dominions of the Eastern empire, unsettled and wandering about with no certain dwelling-place, the people of the Ostrogoths under King Theodoric. Although in the service of the empire, they were dissatisfied with their lot ; and they were so savage and so powerful that the emperor was in constant dread of them. Why might not this force be em- ployed to destroy the dominion of the Heruli, and deliver Rome from the interferences and oppression of Odoacer? The suggestion was made to Theodoric by the court, but as lie was in the service of the empire, it was necessary that he should have permission to undertake the expedition. He accordingly addressed the emperor as follows : "Although your servant is maintained in affluence by your liberal- ity, graciously listen to the wishes of my heart. Italy, the inheritance of your predecessors, and Rome itself, the head and mistress of the world, now fluctuates under the violence and oppression of Odoacer the mercenary. Direct me with my national troops, to march against the tyrant. If I fall, you will be relieved from an expensive and troublesome friend : if, with the divine permission, I succeed, I shall govern in your name, and to your glory, the Roman Senate, and the part of the republic delivered from slavery by my victorious army." u The proposition which had been suggested was gladly accepted by the emperor Zeno, arid in the winter of 489, the whole nation took up its march of seven hundred miles to Italy. "The march of Theodoric must be considered as the emigra- tion of an entire people : the wives and children of the Goths, their aged parents, and most precious effects, were carefully transported ; . . . and at length, surmounting every obstacle by skillful conduct and persevering courage, he descended from the Julian Alps, and displayed his invin- cible banners on the confines of Italy." Gibbon. Theodoric defeated Odoacer in three engagements, A. D. 489-490, and ' ' from the Alps to the extremity of Calabria, "Gibbon, "Decline and Fall," chap, xxxix, par. 5. w /d., par. 6. 534 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. Theodoric reigned by right of conquest." Odoacer shut himself up in Ravenna, where he sustained himself against a close siege for three years. By the offices of the bishop of Ravenna, and the clamors of the hungry people, Odoacer was brought to sign a treaty of peace. He was soon after- ward slain at a solemn banquet, and "at the same moment, and without resistance," his people "were universally massa- cred," March 5, A. D. 493. Thus was_ destroyed the kingdom of Odoacer and the Heruli. And that it was in no small degree the work of the Catholic Church is certain ; for, "Throughout the conquest and establishment of the Gothic kingdom, the increasing power and importance of the Catholic ecclesiastics, forces itself upon the attention. They are embassadors, mediators in treaties ; [they] decide the wavering loyalty or instigate the revolt of cities. " Milman. 16 The bishop of Pa via himself bore to Theodoric at Milan the surrender and offer of al- legiance of that great city. Another thing which makes this view most certainly true, is the fact that no sooner was order restored in Italy and in Rome, and the church once more felt itself secure, than a council of eighty bishops, thirty-seven presbyters, and four deacons, was called in Rome by the pope, A. D. 499, the very first act of which was to repeal the law enacted by Odoacer on the subject of the church possessions. Nor was the law repealed in order to get rid of it ; for it was immedi- ately re-enacted by the same council. This was plainly to declare that the estates of the church were no longer subject in any way to the authority of the civil power, but were to be held under the jurisdiction of the church alone. In fact, it was tantamount to a declaration of the independence of the papacy and her possessions. This transaction also conclusively proves that the resent- ment of the bishopric of Rome, which had been aroused by the law of Odoacer, was never allayed until Odoacer and 16 " History of Latin Christianty," book iii, chap, iii, par. 3. THE OD OHIO'S RULE OF ITALY. 535 the law, so far as it represented the authority of the civil power, were both out of the way. And this is the secret of the destruction of the Herulian kingdom of Italy. It is no argument against this to say that the Ostrogoths were Arians too. Because (1) as we shall presently see, Theodoric, though an Arian, did not interfere with church affairs ; and (2) the Church of Rome, in destroying one oppo- nent never hesitates at the prospect that it is to be done by another ; nor that another will arise in the place of the one destroyed. Upon the principle that it is better to have one enemy than two, she will use one to destroy another, and will never miss an opportunity to destroy one for fear that another will arise in its place. Theodoric ruled Italy thirty-three years, A. D. 493-526, during which time Italy enjoyed such peace and quietness and absolute security as had never been known there before, and has never been known there since until 1870. The people of his own nation numbered two hundred thousand men, which with the proportionate number of women and children, formed a population of nearly one million. His troops, formerly so wild and given to plunder, were restored to such discipline that in a battle in Dacia, in which they were completely victorious, ' ' the rich spoils of the enemy lay untouched at their feet," because their leader had given no signal of pillage. When such discipline prevailed in the excitement of a victory and in an enemy's country, it is easy to understand the peaceful order that prevailed in their own new-gotten land which the Herulians had held before them. During the ages of violence and revolution which had passed, large tracts of land in Italy had become utterly desolate and uncultivated ; almost the whole of the rest was under imperfect culture ; but now ' ' agriculture revived under the shadow of peace, and the number of husbandmen multiplied by the redemption of captives ; " and Italy, which had so long been fed from other countries, now actually began to export grain. Civil order was so thoroughly main- 41 536 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. tained that "the city gates were never shut either by day or by night, and the common saying that a purse of gold might be safely left in the fields, was expressive of the con- scious security of the inhabitants. "- Gibbon. 17 Merchants and other lovers of the blessings of peace thronged from all parts. But not alone did civil peace reign. Above all, there was perfect freedom in the exercise of religion. In fact, the measure of civil liberty and peace always depends upon that of religious liberty. Theodoric and his people were Arians, yet at the close of a fifty years' rule of Italy, the Ostrogoths could safely challenge their enemies to present a single authentic case in which they had ever persecuted the Catholics. Even the mother of Theodoric and some of his favorite Goths had embraced the Catholic faith with perfect freedom from any molestation whatever. The separation between Church and State, between civil and religious powers, was clear and distinct. Church property was pro- tected in common with other property, while at the same time it was taxed in common with all other property. The clergy were protected in common with all other people, and they were likewise, in common with all other people, cited before the civil courts to answer for all civil offenses. In all ecclesiastical matters they were left entirely to them- selves. Even the papal elections Theodoric left entirely to themselves, and though often solicited by both parties to interfere, he refused to have anything at all to do with them, except to keep the peace, which in fact was of itself no small task. He declined even to confirm the papal elections, an office which had been exercised by Odoacer. jSTor was this merely a matter of toleration ; it was in genuine recognition of the rights of conscience. In a letter to the emperor Justin, A. D. 524, Theodoric announced the gen- uine principle of the rights of conscience, and the relation- 17 " Decline and Fall," chap, xxxix, par. 14; and Milmam's "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, iii, par. 5, PAPAL PROCEEDINGS IN ROME. 537 ship that should exist between religion and the State, in the following words, worthy to be graven in letters of gold : "To pretend to a dominion over the conscience, is to usurp the pre- rogative of God. By the nature of things, the power of sovereigns is confined to political government. They have no right of punishment but over those who disturb the public peace. The most dangerous heresy is that of a sovereign who separates himself from part of his sub- jects, because they believe not according to his belief." 18 Similar pleas had before been made by the parties op- pressed, but never before had the principle been announced by the party in power. The enunciation and defense of a principle by the party who holds the power to violate it, is the surest pledge that the principle is held in genuine sincerity. The description of the state of peace and quietness in Italy above given, applies to Italy, ~but not to Rome / to the dominions of Theodoric and the Ostrogoths, but not to the city of the pope and the Catholics. In A. D. 499, there was a papal election. As there were as usual rival candidates Symmachus and Laurentius there was a civil war. " The two factions encountered with the fiercest hostility ; the clergy, the Senate, and the populace were divided ; " the streets of the city ' ' ran with blood, as in the days of repub- lican strife. " Milman. 19 The contestants were so evenly matched, and the violent strife continued so long, that the leading men of both parties persuaded the candidates to go to Theodoric at Ravenna, and submit to his judgment their claims. Theod- oric's love of justice and of the rights of the people, read- ily and simply enough decided that the candidate who had the most votes should be counted elected ; and if the votes were evenly divided, then the candidate who had been first ordained. Symmachus secured the office. A council was 18 Milman's " History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, iii, par. 8 from the end. 19 7d., par. U. 538 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. held by Symmachus, which met the first of March, 499, and passed a decree "almost in the terms of the old Roman law, severely condemning all ecclesiastical ambition, all canvassing either to obtain subscriptions, or administration of oaths, or promises, for the papacy " during the lifetime of a pope. But such election methods as these were now so prevalent that this law was of as little value in controlling the methods of the aspiring candidates for the bishopric, as in the days of the republic the same kind of laws were for the candidates to the consulship. Laurentius, though defeated at this time, did not discon- tinue his efforts to obtain the office. For four years he watched for opportunities, and carried on an intrigue to dis- place Symmachus, and in 503 brought a series of heavy charges against him. ' ' The accusation was brought before the judgment-seat of Theodoric, supported by certain Roman females of rank, who had been suborned, it was said, by the enemies of Symmachus. Symmachus was summoned to Ravenna and confined at Rimini," but escaped and returned to Rome. Meantime, Laurentius had entered the city, and when Symmachus returned, "the sanguinary tumults be- tween the two parties broke out with greater fury ; " priests were slain, monastaries set on fire, and nuns treated with the utmost indignity. The Senate petitioned Theodoric to send a visitor to judge the cause of Symmachus in the crimes laid against him. The king finding that that matter was only a church quarrel, appointed one of their own number, the bishop of Altimo, who so clearly favored Laurentius that his partisan- ship only made the contention worse. Again Theodoric was petitioned to interfere, but he declined to assume any juris- diction, and told them to settle it among themselves ; but as there was so much disturbance of the peace, and it was so long continued, Theodoric commanded them to reach some sort of settlement that would stop their fighting, and restore public order. A council was therefore called. As Symma- THE POPE PUT ABOVE TEE STATE. 539 chus was on his way to the council, ' ' he was attacked by the adverse party ; showers of stones fell around him ; many presbyters and others of his followers were severely wounded ; the pontiff himself only escaped under the pro- tection of the Gothic guard " (3ilman?), and took refuge in the church of St. Peter. The danger to which he was then exposed he made an excuse for not appearing at the council. The most of the council were favorable to Symmachus and to the pretensions of the bishop of Rome at this time, and therefore were glad of any excuse that would relieve them from judging him. However, they went through the form of summoning him three times ; all of which he de- clined. Then the council sent deputies to state to Theodoric the condition of affairs, ' ' saying to him that the authority of the king might compel Symmachus to appear, but that the council had not such authority." Theodoric replied that "with respect to the cause of Symmachus, he had assembled them to judge him, but yet left them at full liberty to judge him or not, providing they could by any other means put a stop to the present calamities, and restore the wished-for tranquillity to the city of Rome. " The majority of the council declared Symmachns "ab- solved in the sight of men, whether guilty or innocent in the sight of God," for the reason that " no assembly of bishops has power to judge the pope ; he is accountable for his actions to God alone." Bower ^ They then commanded all, under penalty of excommunication, to accept this judg- ment, and submit to the authority of Symmachus, and acknowledge him "for lawful bishop of the holy city of Rome." Symmachus was not slow to assert all the merit that the council had thus recognized in the bishop of Rome. He wrote to the emperor of the East that ' ' a bishop is as much above an emperor as heavenly things, which the bishop administers and dispenses, are above all the trash of 20 Id., par. 14. 21 " History of the Popes," Symmachus, par. 9, 10, 540 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. the earth, which alone the greatest among the emperors have the power to dispose of." Bower. He declared that the higher powers referred to in Romans xiii, 1, mean the spiritual powers, and that to these it is that every soul must be subject. At another council held in Rome in 504, at the direction of Symmachus, a decree was enacted "anathematizing and excluding from the communion of the faithful, all who had seized or in the future should seize, hold, or appropriate to themselves, the goods or estates of the church ; and this de- cree was declared to extend even to those who held such estates by grants from the crown." Bmuer This was explicitly to put the authority of the church of Rome above that of any State. Justin was emperor of the East A. D. 518-527. He was violently orthodox, and was supported by his nephew, the more violently orthodox Justinian. It was the ambition of both, together and in succession, to make the Catholic re- ligion alone prevalent everywhere. They therefore entered with genuine Catholic zeal upon the pious work of clearing their dominions of heretics. The first edict, issued in 523, commanded all Manichseans to leave the empire under pen- alty of death ; and all other heretics were to be ranked with pagans and Jews, and excluded from all public offices. This edict was no sooner learned of in the West, than mut- terings were heard in Rome, of hopes of liberty from the " Gothic yoke." The next step was violence. Under the just administration of Theodoric, and the safety assured by the Gothic power, many Jews had estab- lished themselves in Rome, Genoa, Milan, and other cities, for the purposes of trade. They were permitted by express laws to dwell there. As soon as the imperial edict was known, which commanded all remaining heretics to be ranked as pagans and Jews, as the Catholics did not dare to attack the Gothic heretics, they, at Rome and Ravenna 22 Id., par. 16. * 3 Id., par. 18. CONSPIRACIES AGAINST THE OSTROGOTHS. 541 especially, riotously attacked the Jews, abused them, robbed them, and burnt their synagogues. A legal investigation was attempted, but the leader* in the riots could not be dis- covered. Then Theodoric levied a tax upon the whole com- munity of the guilty cities, with which to settle the damages. Some of the Catholics refused to pay the tax. They were punished. This at once brought a cry from the Catholics everywhere, that they were persecuted. Those who had been punished were glorified as confessors of the faith, and "three hundred pulpits deplored the persecution of the church."- Gibbon. zi The edict of 523 was followed in 524 by another, this time commanding the Arians of the East to deliver up to the Catholic bishops all their churches, which the Catholic bishops were commanded to consecrate anew. Theodoric addressed an earnest letter to Justin, in which he pleaded for toleration for the Arians from the Eastern empire. This was the letter in which was stated the prin- ciple of the rights of conscience, which we have already quoted on page 537. To this noble plea, however, "Justin coolly answered : "I pretend to no authority over men's consciences, but it is my pre- rogative to intrust the public offices to those in whom I have confidence ; and public order demanding uniformity of worship, I have full right to command the churches to be open to those alone who shall conform to the religion of the State." 25 Accordingly, while pretending to no authority over men's consciences, the Arians of his dominions were by Justin " stripped of all offices of honor or emolument, were not only expelled from the Cathoffc churches, but their own were closed against them ; and they were exposed to all insults, vexations, and persecutions of their adversaries, who were not likely to enjoy their triumph with moderation, **" Decline and Fall," chap, xxxlx, par. 17 ; Milman's "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, iii, par. 23. 25 Milman's "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, iii, par. 30. 542 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAP ACT. or to repress their conscientiously intolerant zeal." JUilman. Many of them conformed to the state religion ; but those of firm faith sent to Theodoric earnest appeals for protection. Theodoric did all that he could, but without avail. He was urged to retaliate by persecuting the Catholics in Italy, but he steadfastly refused. He determined to send an em- bassy to Justin, and most singularly sent the pope as his embassador. "The pope, attended by five other bishops and four senators, set forth on a mission of which it was the ostensible object to obtain indulgence for heretics heretics under the ban of his church heretics looked upon with the most profound detestation." MilmanJ 1 This arrange- ment gave the bishop of Rome the most perfect opportunity he could have asked, to form a compact with the imperial authority of the East, for the further destruction of the Ostrogothic kingdom. The pope, John I, ' ' was received in Constantinople with the most flattering honors, as though he had been St. Peter himself. The whole city, with the emperor at its head, came forth to meet him with tapers and torches, as far as ten miles beyond the gates. The emperor knelt at his feet, and implored his benediction. On Easter day, March 30, 525, he performed the service in the great church, Epiphanius the bishop ceding the first place to the holy stranger." Milman. Such an embassy could have no other result than more than ever to endanger the kingdom of Theodoric. Before John's return, the conspiracy became more manifest ; some senators and leading men were ar- rested. One of them, Boethius, though denying his guilt, boldly confessed, "Had there been any hopes of liberty, I should have freely indulged them ; had I known of a con- spiracy against the king, I should have answered in the words of a noble Roman to the frantic Caligula, You would not have known it from me." 29 Such a confession as that Id. Id. K Id., par. 82. 89 /d., par. 28. 544 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. of his country was often sacrificed to that of defender of the faith." Gibbon.* 1 "The emperor Justinian unites in him- self the most opposite vices, insatiable rapacity and lavish prodigality, intense pride and contemptible weakness, un- measured ambition and dastardly cowardice. ... In the Christian emperor, seem to meet the crimes of those who won or secured their empire Jby assassination of all whom they feared, the passion for public diversions without the accomplishments of Nero or the brute strength of Commo- dus, the dotage of Claudius."- Milman. Pope Felix was succeeded by Boniface II, A. D. 530-532, who was chosen amidst the now customary scenes of dis- turbance and strife, which in this case were brought to an end, and the election of Boniface secured, by the death of his rival, who after his death was excommunicated by Boniface. On account of the shameful briberies and other methods of competition employed in the election of the popes, the Roman Senate now enacted a law "declaring null and execrable all promises, bargains, and contracts, by whomsoever or for whomsoever made, with a view to engage suffrages in the election of the pope ; and excluding forever from having any share in the election, such as should be found to have been directly or indirectly concerned either for them- selves or others, in contracts or bargains of that nature." Bower. Laws of the same import had already been enacted more than once, but they amounted to nothing ; be- cause as in the days of Caesar, everybody was ready to bribe or be bribed. Accordingly, at the very next election, in 532, "Votes were publicly bought and sold ; and notwithstanding the decree lately issued by the Senate, money was offered to the senators themselves, nay,, the lands of the church were mortgaged by some, and the sacred utensils pawned by others or publicly sold for ready money. " Itower. 3 * As the result 31 " Decline and Fall," chap, xlvii, par. 23, 33 "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap.'iv, par. 2. 83 "History of the Popes," Boniface II, par. 3. s* Id., John II, par. 1. THE TRISAGION CONTROVERSY. 545 of seventy-five days of this kind of work, a certain John Mer- curius was made pope, and took the title of John II, De- cember 31, 532. In the year 532, Justinian issued an edict declaring his intention "to unite all men in one faith." Whether they were Jews, Gentiles, or Christians, all who did not within three months profess and embrace the Catholic faith, were by the edict " declared infamous, and as such excluded from all employments both civil and military ; rendered incapable of leaving anything by will ; and all their estates confiscated, whether real or personal." As a result of this cruel edict, " Great numbers were driven from their habitations with their wives and children, stripped and naked. Others be- took themselves to flight, carrying with them what they could conceal, for their support and maintenance ; but they were plundered of what little they had, and many of them inhumanly massacred." Bower. , 35 There now occurred a transaction which meant much in the supremacy of the papacy. It was brought about in this way: Ever since the Council of Chalcedon had "settled" the question of the two natures in Christ, there had been more, and more violent, contentions over it than ever before ; "for everywhere monks were at the head of the religious revolution which threw off the yoke of the Council of Chal- cedon." In Jerusalem a certain Theodosius was at the head of the army of monks, who made him bishop, and in acts of violence, pillage, and murder, he fairly outdid the perfectly lawless bandits of the country. "The very scenes of the Saviour's mercies ran with blood shed in his name by his ferocious self-called disciples." Milman. 36 In Alexandria "the bishop was not only murdered in the baptistery, but his body was treated with shameless indignities, and other enormities were perpetrated which might have appalled a cannibal." And the monkish horde 35 Id., par. 2. 36 "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, i, par. 5. 546 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. then elected as bishop one of their own number, Timothy the Weasel, a disciple of Dioscorus. Milman. 51 Soon there was added to all this, another point which increased the fearful warfare. In the Catholic churches it was customary to sing what was called the Trisagion, or Thrice-Holy. It was, originally, the "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of Hosts " of Isaiah vi, 3 ; but at the time of the Council of Chalcedon, it had been changed, and was used by the council thus : "Holy God, Holy Almighty, Holy Im- mortal, have mercy on us." At Antioch, in 477, a third monk, Peter the Fuller, "led a procession, chiefly of mo- nastics, through the streets," loudly singing the Thrice-Holy, with the addition, "Who wast crucified for us." It was orthodox to sing it as the Council of Chalcedon had used it, with the understanding that the three "Holies" referred respectively to the three persons of the Trinity. It was heresy to sing it with the later addition. In A. D. 511, two hordes of monks on the two sides of the question met in Constantinople. "The two black- cowled armies watched each other for several months, work- ing in secret on their respective partisans. At length they came to a rupture. . . . The Monophysite monks in the Church of the Archangel within the palace, broke out after the ' Thrice-Holy ' with the burden added at Antioch by Peter the Fuller, 'who wast crucified for us. 1 The orthodox monks, backed by the rabble of Constantinople, endeavored to expel them from the church ; they were not content with hurling curses against each other, sticks and stones began their work. There was a wild, fierce fray ; the divine pres- ence of the emperor lost its awe ; he could not maintain the peace. The bishop Macedonius either took the lead, or was compelled to lead the tumult. Men, women, and children poured out from all quarters ; the monks with their archi- 37 Id. Bower calls him Timothy the Cat ; but whether " weasel " or " cat," the distinction is not material, as either fitly describes his disposition, though both would not exaggerate it. JUSTINIAN JOINS IN THE CONTROVERSY. 54.7 mandrites at the head of the raging multitude, echoed back their religious war-cry." Milman. 38 These are but samples of the repeated it might almost be said the continuous occurrences in the cities of the East. "Throughout Asiatic Christendom it was the same wild struggle. Bishops deposed quietly ; or where resist- ance was made, the two factions fighting in the streets, in the churches : cities, even the holiest places, ran with blood. . . . The hymn of the angels in heaven was the battle cry on earth, the signal of human bloodshed." Milman. 39 In A. D. 512 one of these Trisagion riots broke out in Constantinople, because the emperor proposed to use the added clause. "Many palaces of the nobles were set on fire, the officers of the crown insulted, pillage, conflagration, violence, raged through the city." In the house of the favorite minister of the emperor there was found a monk from the country. He was accused of having suggested the use of the addition. His head was cut off, and raised high on a pole, and the whole orthodox populace marched through the streets singing the orthodox Trisagion^ and shouting, " Be-hold the enemy of the Trinity." 40 In A. D. 519, another dispute was raised, growing out of the addition to the Trisagion. That was, "Did one of the Trinity suffer in the flesh ? or did one person of the Trinity suffer in the flesh ? " The monks of Scythia affirmed that one of the Trinity suffered in the flesh, and declared that to say that one person of the Trinity suffered in the flesh, was absolute heresy. The question was brought before Pope Hormisdas, who decided that " one person of the Trinity suffered in the flesh " was the orthodox view ; and de- nounced the monks as proud, arrogant, obstinate, enemies to the church, disturbers of the public peace, slanderers, liars, and instruments employed by the enemy of truth to banish all truth, to establish error in its room, and 38 Id., par. 31. 39 Id., par. 21, 22. 548 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. to sow among the wheat the poisonous seeds of diabol- ical tares. Now, in 533, this question was raised again, and Justin- ian became involved in the dispute. This time one set of monks argued that "if one of the Trinity did not suffer on the cross, then one of the Trinity was not born of the Virgin Mary, and therefore she ought no longer to be called the Mother of God." Others argued : " If one of the Trinity did not suffer on the cross, then Christ who suffered was not one of the Trinity." Justinian entered the lists against both, and declared that Mary was "truly the Mother of God;" that Christ was "in the strictest sense one of the Trinity ; " and that whosoever denied either the one or the other, was a heretic. This frightened the monks, because they knew Justinian's opinions on the subject of heretics were exceedingly forcible. They therefore sent off two of their number to lay the question before the pope. As soon as Justinian learned this, he too decided to apply to the pope. He therefore drew up a confession of faith that "one of the Trinity suffered in the flesh," and sent it by two bishops to the bishop of Rome. To make his side of the question appear as favorable as possible to the pope, he sent a rich present of chalices and other vessels of gold, enriched with precious stones ; and the following flattering letter : "Justinian, pious, fortunate, renowned, triumphant; emperor, con- sul, etc., to John, the most holy Archbishop of our city of Rome, and patriarch : "Rendering honor to the apostolic chair, and to your Holiness, as has been always and is our wish, and honoring your Blessedness as a father, we have hastened to bring to the knowledge of your Holiness all matters relating to the state of the churches. It having been at all times our great desire to preserve the unity of your apostolic chair, and the constitution of the holy churqhes of God which has obtained hitherto, and still obtains. " Therefore we have made no delay in subjecting and uniting to your Holiness all the priests of the whole East. " For this reason we have thought fit to bring to your notice the present matters of disturbance ; though they are manifest and unques- THE VANDAL KINGDOM UPROOTED. 549 tionable, and always firmly held and declared by the whole priesthood according to the doctrine of your apostolic chair. For we cannot suffer that anything which relates to the state of the church, however manifest and unquestionable, should be moved, without the knowledge of your Holiness, who are THE HEAD OP ALL THE HOLY CHURCHES ; for in all things, we have already declared, we are anxious to increase the honor and authority of your apostolic chair." 41 All things were now ready for the deliverance of the Catholic Church from Arian dominion. Since the death of Theodoric, divided councils had crept in amongst the Ostro- goths, and the Catholic Church had been more and more cementing to i|s interests the powers of the Eastern throne. "Constant amicable intercourse was still taking place be- tween the Catholic clergy of the East and the West ; between Constantinople and Kome ; between Justinian and the rapid succession of pontiffs who occupied the throne during the ten years between the death of Theodoric and the invasion of Italy." Milman.* 2 The crusade began with the invasion of the Arian king- dom of the Vandals in Africa, of whom Gelimer was the king, and was openly and avowedly in the interests of the Catholic religion and church. For in a council of his minis- ters, nobles, and bishops, Justinian was dissuaded from undertaking the African war. He hesitated, and was about to relinquish his design, when he was rallied by a fanatical bishop, who exclaimed : "I have seen a vision ! It is the will of heaven, O emperor, that you should not abandon your holy enterprise for the deliverance of the African church. The God of battle will march before your standard and dis perse your enemies, who are the enemies of his Son."* 3 This persuasion was sufficient for the "pious" emperor, and in June 533, " the whole fleet of six hundred ships was ranged in martial pomp before the gardens of the palace," laden and equipped with thirty-five thousand troops and "Croly's "Apocalypse," chap, xl, "History," under verses 3-10. 42 " History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, iv, par. 6, 43 Gibbon's "Decline and Fall," chap, xli, par. 3, 42 550 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. sailors, and five thousand horses, all under the command of Belisarius. He landed on the coast of Africa in September ; Carthage was captured on the 18th of the same month ; Geli- mer was disastrously defeated in November ; and the con- quest of Africa, and the destruction of the Vandal kingdom, was completed by the capture of Gelimer in the spring of 534." During the rest of the year, Belisarius " reduced the islands of Corsica, Sardinia, Majorica, Minorica, and what- ever else belonged to the Yandals, either on the continent or in the islands." Bower. ^ Belisarius dispatched to Justinian the new of his victory. ' l He received the messengers of victory at the time when he was preparing to publish the Pandects of the Roman law ; and the devout or jealous emperor celebrated the divine goodness and confessed, in silence, the merit of his success- ful general. Impatient to abolish the temporal and spiritual tyranny of the Yandals, he proceeded, without delay, to the full establishment of the Catholic Church. Her jurisdiction, wealth, and immunities, perhaps the most essential part of episcopal religion, were restored and amplified with a liberal hand ; the Arian worship was suppressed, the Donatist meet- ings were proscribed ; and the Synod of Carthage, by the voice of two hundred and seventeen bishops, applauded the just measure of pious retaliation." Gibbon.^ As soon as this pious work had been fully accomplished in Africa, the arms of Justinian were turned against Italy and the Arian Ostrogoths. In 534 Amalasontha had been supplanted in her rule over the Ostrogoths by her cousin Theodotus. And "during the short and troubled reign of Theodotus 534 to 536 Justinian received petitions from all parts of Italy, and from all persons, lay as well as cler- ical, with the air and tone of its sovereign." Milman." 44 Id., par. 7-12. 45 " History of the Popes," Agapetus, par. 5, note A. * 6 " Decline and Fall," chap, xli, par. 11. 17 " History of Latin Christianity," book iii chap, iv, par. 7. THE OSTROOOTHIC KINGDOM DESTROYED. 551 Belisarius subdued Sicily in 535, and invaded Italy and captured Naples in 536. As it was now about the first of December, the Gothic warriors decided to postpone, until the following spring, their resistance to the invaders. A garrison of four thousand soldiers 'was left in Rome, a feeble number to defend such a city at such a time in any case, but these troops proved to be even more feeble in faith than they were in numbers. They threw over all care of the city, and " furiously exclaimed that the apostolic throne should no longer be profaned by the triumph or toleration of Arianism ; that the tombs of the Caesars should no longer be trampled by the savages of the North ; and, without reflect- ing that Italy must sink into a province of Constantinople, they fondly hailed the restoration of a Roman emperor as a new era of freedom and prosperity. The deputies of the pope and clergy, of the Senate and people, invited the lieutenant of Justinian to accept their voluntary allegiance, and to enter into the city whose gates would be thrown open to his reception." - Gibbon.** Belisarius at once marched to Rome, which he entered De- cember 10, 536. But this was not the conquest of Italy or even of Rome. ' ' From their rustic habitations, from their different garrisons, the Goths assembled at Ravenna for the defense of their country : and such were their numbers that after an army had been detached for the relief of Dalmatia, one hundred and fifty thousand fighting men marched under the royal standard" in the spring, A. D. 537 ; and the Gothic nation returned to the siege of Rome and the defense of Italy against the invaders. "The whole nation of the Ostrogoths had been assembled for the attack, and was al- most entirely consumed in the siege of Rome," which con- tinued above a year, 537-538. "One year and nine days after the commencement of the siege, an army so lately strong and triumphant, burnt their tents, and tumultuously repassed the Milvian bridge," and Rome was delivered, 48 " Decline and Fall," chap, xli, par. 22. 552 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. March 538. The remains of the kingdom were soon after- ward destroyed. "They had lost their king (an inconsid- erable loss), their capital, their treasures, the provinces from Sicily to the Alps, and the military force of two hun- dred thousand barbarians, magnificently equipped with horses and arms."- - Gibbon.** And thus was the kingdom of the Ostrogoths destroyed before the vengeful arrogance of the papacy. This completely opened the way for the bishop of Rome to assert his sole authority over the estates of the church. The district immediately surrounding Rome was called the Roman duchy, and it was so largely occupied by the estates of the church that the bishop of Rome claimed exclusive authority over it. ' ' The emperor, indeed, con- tinued to control the elections and to enforce the payment of tribute for the territory protected by the imperial arms ; but, on the other hand, the pontiff exercised a definite authority within the Roman duchy, and claimed to have a voice in the appointment of the civil officers who administered the local government." Encyclopedia Britannica. Un- der the protectorate of the armies of the East which soon merged in the exarch of Ravenna, the papacy enlarged its aspirations, confirmed its powers, and strengthened its situa- tion both spiritually and temporally. Being by the decrees of the councils, and the homage of the emperor, made the head of all ecclesiastical and spiritual dominion on earth, and being now in possession of territory, and exerting a measure of civil authority therein, the opportunity that now fell to the ambition of the bishopric of Rome was to assert, to gain, and to exercise, supreme authority in all things tem- poral as well as spiritual. And the sanction of this aspira- 49 Id., par. 23, 28, and chap, xliii, par. 4. Afterward, from 541 till 553, there was carried on what had been called the " Gothic " War ; but those who made the war were not Goths. They were " a new people," made up of Roman captives, slaves, deserters, and whoever else might choose to join them, with but a thousand Goths to begin with. See Gibbon, Id., chap, xliii, par. 4 and 6. 60 Article "Popedom," par. 25. TEMPORAL AUTHORITY OF THE PAPACY. 553 tion was made to accrue from Justinian's letter, in which he rendered such distinctive honor to the apostolic see. It is true that Justinian wrote these words with no such far-reach- ing meaning, but that made no difference ; the words were written, and like all other words of similar import, they could be, and were, made to bear whatever meaning the bishop of Rome should choose to find in them. Therefore, the year A. D. 538, which marks the conquest of Italy, the deliverance of Rome, and the destruction of the kingdom of the Ostrogoths, is the true date which marks the establishment of the temporal authority of the papacy, and the exercise of that authority as a world-power. All that was ever done later in this connection was but to enlarge by additional usurpations and donations, the territories which the bishop of Rome at this point possessed, and over which he asserted civil jurisdiction. This view is fully sustained by the following excellent statement of the case : " The conquest of Italy by the Greeks was, to a great extent at least, the work of the Catholic clergy. . . . The overthrow of the Gothic king- dom was to Italy an unmitigated evil. A monarch like Witiges or Totila would soon have repaired the mischiefs caused by the degenerate successors of Theodoric, Athalaric, and Theodotus. In their overtliroio began the fatal policy of the Roman see, . . . which never would permit a powerful native kingdom to unite Italy, or a very large part of it, under one dominion. Whatever it may have been to Christendom, the papacy has been the eternal, implacable foe of Italian independence and Italian unity ; and so (as far as independence and unity might have given dig- nity, political weight, and prosperity) to the welfare of Italy. . . . Rome, jealous of all temporal sovereignty but her own, for centuries yielded up, or rather made Italy a battle field to the Transalpine and the stranger, and at the same time so secularized her own spiritual suprem- acy as to confound altogether the priest and the politician, to degrade absolutely and almost irrevocably the kingdom of Christ into a kingdom of this world." Milman. 61 Then "began that fatal policy of the Roman see," be- cause she was then herself a world-power, possessing tem- poralities over which she both claimed and exercised domin- 61 " History of Latin Christianity," book Hi, chap, iv, last two par. 554: THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. ion, and by virtue of which she could contend with other dominions, and upon the same level. And that which made the papacy so much the more domineering in this fatal policy, was the fact of Justinian's having so fully committed himself. When the mightiest emperor who had ever sat on the Eastern throne had not only under his own hand ren- dered such decided homage to the papacy, but had rooted out the last power that stood in her way, this to her was strongly justifiable ground for her assertion of dominion over all other dominions, and her disputing dominion with the powers of the earth. It is evident that as the papacy had hitherto claimed, and had actually acquired, absolute dominion over all things spiritual, henceforth she would claim, and, if crafty policy and unscrupulous procedure were of any avail, would actu- ally acquire, absolute dominion over all things temporal as well as spiritual. Indeed, as we have seen, this was already claimed, and the history of Europe for more than a thou- sand of the following years, abundantly proves that the claim was finally and fully established. Henceforth kings and emperors were but her tools, and often but her play- things ; and kingdoms and empires her conquests, and often only her traffic. The history of this phase of the papacy is fully as inter- esting, though the details are not so important, as that which shows how her ecclesiastical supremacy was estab- lished. Here, however, will be noticed but the one point, how the papacy assumed the supremacy over kings and em- perors, and acquired the prerogative of dispensing kingdoms and empires. The contest began even with Justinian, who had done so much to exalt the dignity and clear the way of the papacy. Justinian soon became proud of his theological abilities, and presumed to dictate the faith of the papacy, rather than to submit, as formerly, to her guidance. And from A. D. 542 to GREGORY THE (JKEAT. THE LOMBARDS INVADE ITALY. 555 the end of his long reign in 565, there was almost constant war, with alternate advantage, between Justinian and the popes. But as emperors live and die, while the papacy only lives, the real victory remained with her. In A. D. 568 the Lombards invaded Italy, and for nearly twenty years wrought such devastation that even the pope thought the world was coming to an. end. The imperial power of the East was so weak that the defense of Italy fell exclusively to the exarch of Ravenna and the pope. And as "the death of Narses had left his successor, the exarch of Ravenna, only the dignity of a sovereignty which he was too weak to exercise for any useful purpose of government " (Milman 5z \ the pope alone became the chief defender of Italy. In 580 Gregory I the Great became pope, and concluded a treaty of peace with the Lombards, and ' ' the pope and the king of the Lombards became the real powers in the north and center of Italy. "-- Encyclopedia Britan- nica. 5s The wife of the king of the Lombards was a Catholic, and by the influence of Gregory, she "solemnly placed the Lombard nation under the patronage of St. John the Baptist. At Monza she built in his honor the first Lombard church, and the royal palace near it." Id. From this the Lombards soon became Catholic ; but though this was so, they would not suffer the priesthood to have any part in the affairs of the kingdom. They "never admitted the bishops of Italy to a seat in their legislative councils." Gibbon. 5 * And although under the Lombard dominion "the Italians enjoyed a milder and more equitable government than any of the other kingdoms which had been founded on the ruins of the empire," this exclusion of the clergy from affairs of the State was as much against them now, though Catholic, 5a "History of Latin Christianity," book iii, chap, vii, par. 1. 63 Article " Lombards," par 6. 54 " Decline and Fall," chap. xlv. par. 18. 556 THE SUPREMACY OF TEE PAPACY. as their Arianism had been against them before ; and the popes ever anxiously hoped to have them driven entirely from Italy. In 728 the edict of the Eastern emperor abolishing the images, was published in Italy. The pope defended the images, of course, and "the Italians swore to live and die in defense of the pope and the holy images." Gibbon. An alliance was formed between the Lombards and the papacy for the defense of the images. The alliance, how- ever, did not last long. Both powers being determined to possess as much of Italy as possible, there was constant irritation, which finally culminated in open hostilities, and the Lombards invaded the papal territory in A. D. 739. Charles Martel, the mayor of the palace of the Frankish kingdom, had gained a world-wide glory by his late victory over the Mohammedans at Tours. Of all the barbarians, the Franks were the first who had become Catholic, and ever since, they had been dutiful sons of the church. The pope, Gregory III, now determined to appeal to Charles for help against this assertion of Lombard dominion. He sent to Charles the keys of the " sepulcher of St. Peter ;" some filings from the chains with which " Peter had been bound ; " and, more important than all, as the legitimate inheritor of the authority of the ancient Roman republic, he presumed to bestow upon Charles Martel the title of Roman consul. " Throughout these transactions the pope appears actually, if not openly, an independent power, leaguing with the allies or the enemies of the empire, as might suit the exigencies of the time." And now, " the pope, as an inde- pendent potentate, is forming an alliance with a Transalpine sovereign for the liberation of Italy." MilmanJ* The Lombards, too, sent to Charles with counter nego- tiations. This the pope knew, and wrote to Charles that in 55 Id., chap, xlix, par. 9. 56 " History of Latin Christianity," book iv, chap, ix, par. 14, 26. THE POPE APPEALS TO FRANCE. 557 Italy the Lombards were treating him with contempt, and were saying, "Let him come, this Charles, with his army of Franks ; if he can, let him rescue you out of our hands ; " and then Gregory laments and pleads with Charles thus : "O unspeakable grief, that such sons so insulted should make no effort to defend their holy mother the church ! Not that St. Peter is unable to protect his successors, and to exact vengeance upon their op- pressors, but the apostle is putting the faith of his followers to trial. Believe not the Lombard kings, that their only object is to punish their refractory subjects, the dukes of Spoleto and Benevento, whose only crime is that they will not join in the invasion and plunder of the Roman see. Send, O my Christian son, some faithful officer, who may report to you truly the condition of affairs here ; who may behold with his own eyes the persecutions we are enduring, the humiliation of the church, the desolation of our property, the sorrow of the pilgrims who frequent our shrine. Close not your ears against our supplication, lest St. Peter close against you the gates of heaven. I conjure you by the living and the true God, and by the keys of St. Peter, not to prefer the alliance of the Lombards to the love of the great apostle, but hasten, hasten to our succor, that we may say with the prophet, ' The Lord has heard us in the day of tribulation, the God of Jacob has protected us.'' 57 The embassadors and the letters of the pope "were re- ceived by Charles with decent reverence ; but the greatness of his occupations and the shortness of his life, prevented his interference in the affairs of Italy, except by friendly and ineffectual mediation."-- Gibbon. But affairs soon took such a turn in France that the long-cherished desire of the papacy was rewarded with abundant fruition. Charles Martel was simply duke or mayor of the palace, under the sluggard kings of France. He died October 21, 741. Gregory III died November 27, of the same year, and was succeeded by Zacharias. No immediate help coming from France, Zacharias made overtures to the Lombards, arid a 67 Milraan's " History of Latin Christianity," book iv, chap. Ix, par. 24, 68 " Decline and Fall," chap, xlix, par. 12. 558 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. treaty of peace for twenty years was concluded between the kingdom of Lombardy and ' ' the dukedom of Rome. " Charles Martel left two sons, Carloman and Pepin ; but Carloman being the elder, was his successor in office. He had been in place but a little while, before he resigned it to his brother, and became a monk, A. D. 747. The events in Italy, and the prestige which the pope had gained by them, exerted a powerful influence in France, and as the pope had already desired a league with Charles Martel, who although not possessing the title, held all the authority, of a king, Pepin, his successor, conceived the idea that perhaps he could secure the papal sanction to his assuming the title of king with the authority which he already possessed. Pepin therefore sent two ecclesiastics to consult the pope as to whether he might not be king of France, and Zacharias re- turned answer "that the nation might lawfully unite, in the same person, the title and authority of king ; and that the unfortunate Childeric, a victim of the public safety, should be degraded, shaved, and confined in a monastery for the remainder of his days. An answer so agreeable to their wishes was accepted by the Franks as the opinion of a casu- ist, the sentence of a judge, or the oracle of a prophet ; . . . and Pepin was exalted on a buckler by the suffrage of a free people, accustomed to obey his laws, and to march under his standard ; " and March 7, 752, was proclaimed king of the Franks. Gibbon. Zacharias died March 14 the same year, and was suc- ceeded by Stephen II, who died the fourth day afterward, and before his consecration, and Stephen III became pope, March 26. Astolph was now king of the Lombards. He had openly declared himself the enemy of the pope, and was determined to make not only the territories of the exarchate, but those of the pope, his own. "In terms of contumely and menace, he demanded the instant submission of Rome, and 59 Id., par. 13. THE POPE ANOINTS PEPIN KINO. 559 the payment of a heavy personal tribute, a poll-tax on each citizen." The pope sent embassadors, but they were treated with contempt, and Astolph approached Koine to enforce his demand. "The pope appealed to heaven, by tying a copy of the treaty, violated by Astolph, to the holy cross." Milman. He wrote to Pepin, but got no answer ; in his distress he wrote even to Constantinople, but much less from there was there any answer. Then he determined to go per- sonally to Pepin, and ask his help. There was present at the court of the pope an embassador from the court of France, under whose protection Stephen placed himself, and traveled openly through the dominions of Astolph. No- vember 15, 752 he entered the French dominions. He was met on the frontier by one of the clergy and a nobleman, with orders to conduct him to the court of the king. A hundred miles from the palace he was met by Prince Charles, afterward the mighty Charlemagne, with other no- bles who escorted him on his way. Three miles from the palace, the king himself, with his wife and family, and an array of nobles, met Stephen. " As the pope approached, the king dismounted from his horse, and prostrated himself on the ground before him. He then walked by the side of the pope's palfry. The pope and the ecclesiastics broke out at once into hymns of thanksgiving, and so chanting as they went, reached the royal residence. Stephen lost no time in adverting to the object of his visit. He implored the im- mediate interposition of Pepin to enforce the restoration of St. Peter. . . . Pepin swore at once to fulfill all the requests of the pope ; but, as the winter rendered all military operations impracticable, invited him to Paris, where he took up his residence in the Abbey of St. Denys."- Milman. 61 60 " History of Latin Christianity," book Iv, chap, xi, par. 24. 61 Id., par. 25. 560 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. Pepin had already been anointed by a bishop in France, but this was not enough ; the pope must anoint him too, and then upon this claim that the king of the Franks held his kingdom by the grace of the bishop of Rome. In the mon- astery of St. Denys, Stephen III placed the diadem on the head of Pepin, anointed him with the holy oil, confirmed the sovereignty in his house forever, and pronounced an eternal curse upon all who should attempt to name a king of France from any other than the race of Pepin. The pope was attacked with a dangerous sickness which kept him at the capital of France until the middle of 753. At some point in this series of transactions, we know not exactly where, the pope as the head of the restored republic of Rome, renewed to Pepin the Roman title and dignity of patrician, which, as well as that of consul, had been con- ferred upon Charles Martel. The insignia of this new office were the keys of the shrine of St. Peter, " as a pledge and symbol of sovereignty;" and a "holy" banner which it was their ' ' right and duty to unfurl " in the defense of the church and city of Rome. Meantime Astolpli had persuaded Carloman to leave his monastery, and go to the court of Pepin to counteract the influence of the pope, and if possible to win Pepin to the cause of the Lombards. But the unfortunate Carloman was at once imprisoned "for life," and his life was ended in a few days. In September and October 753, Pepin and the pope marched to Italy against Astolph, who took refuge in Pavia. They advanced to the walls of that city ; and Astolph was glad to purchase an ignominious peace, by pledging himself, on oath, to restore the territory of Rome. Pepin returned to his capital ; and Stephen retired to Rome. But Pepin was no sooner well out of reach, than Astolph was under arms again, and on his way to Rome. He marched to the very gates of the city, and demanded the surrender of the pope. "He demanded that the Romans PEPIN'S GIFT TO THE PAPACY. 561 should give up the pope into his hands, and on these terms only would he spare the city. Astolph declared he would not leave the pope a foot' of land.''- MUnian.^ Stephen hurried away messengers with a letter to Pepin in which the pope reminded him that St. Peter had prom- ised him eternal life in return for a vow which he had made to make a donation to St. Peter. He told Pepin that he risked eternal damnation in not hastening to fulfill his vow ; and that as Peter had Pepin's handwriting to the vow, if he did not fulfill it, the apostle would present it against him in the day of judgment. Pepin did not respond, and a second letter was dispatched in which the pope ""conjured him, by God and his holy mother, by the angels in heaven, by the apostles St. Peter and St. Paul, and by the last day," to hasten to the rescue of , his holy mother the church, and promised him if he would do so, "victory over all the bar- barian nations, and eternal life." But yet Pepin did not respond, and as Astolph was pressing closer and harder, the pope determined to have St. Peter himself address the dilatory king. .Accordingly, he sent now the following letter : "I, Peter the apostle, protest, admonish, and conjure you, the most Christian kings, Pepin, Charles, and Carloman, with all the hierarchy, bishops, abbots, priests, and all monks ; all judges, dukes, counts, and the whole people of the Franks. The M'otfrer of God likewise adjures you, and admonishes and commands you, she as well as the thrones and dominions, and all the hosts of heaven, to save the beloved city of Rome from the detested Lombards. If ye hasten, I, Peter the apostle, promise you my protection in this life and in the next, will prepare for you the most glorious mansions in heaven, will bestow on you the everlasting joys of paradise. Make common cause with my people of Rome, and I will grant whatever ye may pray for. I conjure you not to yield up this city to be lacerated and tormented by the Lombards, lest your own souls be lacerated and tormented in hell, with the devil and his pestilential angels. Of all nations under heaven, the Franks are highest in the esteem of St. Peter ; to me you owe all your victories. Obey, and obey speedily, and, by my suffrage, our Lord Jesus Christ will give you in this ""/acy was laid in the days of Constantino. For, the papacy being pro- fessedly the government of God, he who sits at the head of it, sits there as the representative of God. He represents the divine authority ; and when he speaks or acts officially, his speech or act is that of God. But to make a man thus the representative of God, is only to clothe human passions with divine power and authority. And being human, he is bound always to act unlike God ; and being clothed with irresponsible power, he will often act like the devil. Conse- quently, in order to make all his actions consistent with his profession, he is compelled to cover them all with the divine attributes, and make everything that he does in his official capacity the act of God. This is precisely the logic and the profession of papal infallibility. It is not claimed that all the pope speaks is infallible ; it is only what he speaks offi- cially \vhat he speaks ex cathedra, that is, from the throne. The decree of infallibility is as follows : "We teach and define that it is a dogma divinely revealed, that the Roman pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when in discharge of the office of pastor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine regarding faith or morals to be held by the universal church, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer willed that his church should be endowed for defining doctrines regarding faith or morals ; and that therefore such definitions of the Roman pontiff are irreformable of themselves, and not from the consent of the church. " But if any one which may God avert presume to contradict this our definition, let him be anathema. "Given at Rome in public session solemnly held in the Vatican Ba- silica in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy, on the eighteenth day of July, in the twenty-fifth year of our pontificate." 69 69 Schaff's " History of the Vatican Council," Decrees, chap. iv. The "ponti- ficate " is that of Pius IX. 568 THE SUPREMACY OF THE PAPACY. Under this theory, he sits upon that throne as the head of the government of God, and he sits there as God indeed. For the same pope that published this dogma of infallibility, published a book of his speeches, in the preface to which, in the official and approved edition, he is declared to be "The living Christ," "The voice of God;" "He is nature that protests; he is God that condemns." 70 Thus, in the pa- pacy there is fulfilled to the letter, in completest meaning, the prophecy 2 Thess. ii, 1-9 of " the falling away " and the revealing of "that man of sin," "the son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped ; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God." Therefore, sitting in the place of God, ruling from that place as God, that which he speaks from the throne is the word of God, and must be infallible. This is the inevit- able logic of the false theocratical theory. And if it be denied that the theory is false, there is logically no escape from accepting the whole papal system. Thus so certainly and so infallibly is it true that the false and grossly conceived view of the Old-Testament theocracy, contains within it the germ, of THE ENTIRE PAPACY. n 70 Speeches of Pope Pius IX, pp. 9, 17; Gladstone's Review, p. 6. 71 Neander's " History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. ii, Section Second, part i, div. ii, par. 29. CHAPTER XXIII. PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. THEN came the Eeformation, protesting against the papal system, and asserting again the rights of the individual conscience, declaring for a separation between Church and State, and that to Caesar is to be rendered only that which is Caesar's, while men are left free to render to God, accord- ing to the dictates of their own conscience, that which is God's. To Luther more than to any other one, there fell the blessed task of opening up the contest with the papacy, and of announcing the principles of Protestantism. It is not without cause that Luther stands at the head of all men in the great Reformation and in the history of Protestantism : for he alone of all the leaders in the Reformation times held himself and his cause aloof from the powers of this world, and declined all connection of the State with the work of the gospel, even to support it. After he had burnt the pope's bull, Aleander, the pope's^nuncio, at the coronation of Charles Y at Cologne, addressed the elector, Frederick of Saxony, whose subject Luther was, in these words : "Seethe immense perils to which this man exposes the Christian commonwealth. If a remedy is not speedily applied, the empire is destroyed. What ruined the Greeks, if it was not their abandonment of the pope ? You cannot remain united to Luther without separating from Jesus Christ. In the name of his Holiness, I ask of you two things : first, to burn the writings of Luther ; secondly, to punish him according to his demerits, or at least to give him up a prisoner to the [569] 570 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. pope. The emperor, and all the princes of the empire, have declared their readiness to accede to our demands ; you alone still hesitate." l The elector answered just then, that this was a matter of too much importance to be decided upon the spur of the moment, and at a later time he would give a definite an- swer. At this time Luther wrote to Spalatiu, the elector's chaplain, these words : "If the gospel was of a nature to be propagated or maintained by the power of the world, God would not have intrusted it to fishermen. To defend the gospel appertains not to the princes and pontiffs of this world. They have enough to do to shelter themselves from the judg- ments of the Lord and his Anointed. If I speak, I do it in order that they may obtain the knowledge of the divine word, and be saved by it." 2 As Luther was on his way home from the Diet of Worms, where he made his memorable defense, Frederick had him captured and carried away to the Wartburg, where he was kept in confinement to protect him from the wrath of the papacy, which, through the imperial power, was expressed in the following words : " We, Charles the Fifth, to all the electors, princes, prelates, and others, whom it may concern: "The Almighty having intrusted to us, for the defense of his holy faith, more kingdoms and power than he gave to any of our predeces- sors, we mean to exert ourselves to the utmost to prevent any heresy from arising to pollute our holy empire. " The Augustine monk, Martin Luther, though exhorted by us, has rushed, like a madman, against the holy church, and sought to destroy it by means of books filled with blasphemy. He has, in a shameful manner, insulted the imperishable law of holy wedlock. He has striven to excite the laity to wash their hands in the blood of priests ; and, over- turning all obedience, has never ceased to stir up revolt, division, war, murder, theft, and fire, and to labor completely to ruin the faith of Christians. ... In a word, to pass over all his other iniquities in silence, this creature, who is not a man, but Satan himself under the form of a man, covered with the cowl of a monk, has collected into one stinking 1 D'Aubigne's " History of the Reformation," book vi, chap, xi, par. 9. 2 Jd., par. 13, THE PAPAL POWER AND LUTHER'S PROTECTION. 571 pool all the worst heresies of past times, and has added several new ones of his own. . . . "We have therefore sent this Luther from before our face, that all pious and sensible men may regard him as a fool, or a man possessed of the devil ; and we expect that, after the expiry of his safe-conduct, effectual means will be taken to arrest his furious rage. "Wherefore, under pain of incurring the punishment due to the crime of treason, we forbid you to lodge the said Luther so soon as the fatal term shall be expired, to conceal him, give him meat or drink, and lend him by word or deed, publicly or secretly, any kind of assistance. We enjoin you, moreover, to seize him, or cause him to be seized, wher- ever you find him, and bring him to us without any delay, or to keep him in all safety until you hear from us how you are to act with regard to him, and till you receive the recompense due to your exertions in so holy a work. "As to his adherents, you will seize them, suppress them, and con- fiscate their goods. "As to his writings, if the best food becomes the terror of all man- kind as soon as a drop of poison is mixed with it, how much more ought these books, which contain a deadly poison to the soul, to be not only rejected, but also annihilated ! You will therefore burn them, or in some other way destroy them entirely. "As to authors, poets, printers, painters, sellers or buyers of pla- cards, writings, or paintings against the pope or the church, you will lay hold of their persons and their goods, and treat them according to your good pleasure. "And if any one, whatever be his dignity, shall dare to act in con- tradiction to the decree of our imperial majesty, we ordain that he shall be placed under the ban of the empire. "Let every one conform hereto." 3 Luther remained in the Wartburg until March 3, 1522, when without permission from anybody, he left and returned to Wittemberg. Knowing that his leaving the Wartburg with- out saying anything to the elector, would be ungrateful, and knowing also that his returning at all was virtually disclaim- ing the elector's protection, he addressed to him, the third day of his journey, the following letter : "Grace and peace from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ. 3 Id., book vii, chap, xi, par. 13. 44 572 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. "Most serene elector, gracious lord: What has happened at Wit- temberg, to the great shame of the gospel, has filled me with such grief, that if I were not certain of the truth of our cause, I would have despaired of it. "Your Highness knows or if not, please to be informed I re- ceived the gospel not from men, but from heaven, by our Lord Jesus Christ. If I have asked for conferences, it was not because I had doubts of the truth, but from humility, and for the purpose of winning ."others. But since my humility is turned against the gospel, my conscience now impels me to act in a different manner. I have yielded enough to your Highness in exiling myself during this year. The devil knows it was not from fear I did it. I would have entered Worms, though there had been as many devils in the town as there were tiles on the roofs. Now Duke George, with whom your Highness tries so much to frighten me, is far less to be feared than a single devil. Had that which has taken place at Wittemberg taken place at Leipsic (the duke's residence), I would in- stantly have mounted my horse and gone thither, even though (let your Highness pardon the expression) for nine days it should have done nothing but rain Duke Georges, and every one of them been nine times more furious than he is. What is he thinking of in attacking me ? Does he take Christ, my Lord, for a man of straw ? The Lord be pleased to avert the dreadful judgment which is impending over him. "It is necessary for your Highness to know that I am on my way to Wittemberg, under a more powerful protection than that of an elector. I have no thought of soliciting the assistance of your Highness ; so far from desiring your protection, I would rather give you mine. If I knew that your Highness could or would protect me, I would not come to Wit- temberg. No sword can give any aid to this cause. God alone must do all without human aid or co-operation. He who has most faith is the best protector. Now, I observe that your Highness is still very weak in the faith. " But since your Highness desires to know what to do, I^will answer with all humility. Your electoral Highness has already done too much, and ought to do nothing at all. God does not wish, and cannot tolerate, either your cares and labors, or mine. Let your Highness, therefore, act accordingly. "In regard to what concerns myself, your Highness must act as elec- tor. You must allow the orders of his Imperial Majesty to be executed in your towns and rural districts. You must not throw any difficulty in the way, should it be wished to apprehend or slay me ; for none must oppose the powers that be, save He who established them. " Let your Highness, then, leave the gates open, and respect safe- conducts, should my enemies themselves, or their envoys, enter the THE PRINCIPLES OF PROTESTANTISM. 573 States of your Highness in search of me. In this way you will avoid all embarrassment and danger. "I have written this letter in haste, that you may not be disconcerted on learning my arrival. He with whom I have to deal is a different per- son from Duke George. He knows me well, and I know something of Him. " Your electoral Highness's most humble servant, " MARTIN LUTHER.* " Borna, the Conductor Hotel, Ash -Wednesday, 1522." During his absence, fanatical spirits had arisen, and extreme and somewhat violent steps had been taken, and amongst the first words which he spoke upon his arrival in Wittemberg were these : "It is by the word that we must fight ; by the word overturn and destroy what has been established by violence. I am unwilling to employ force against the superstitious or the unbelieving. Let him who believes approach ; let him who believes not stand aloof. None ought to be constrained. Liberty is of the essence of faith." 5 In 1524 the Swabian peasants revolted, and in January, 1525, Luther addressed to them the following words : "The pope and the emperor have united against me ; but the more the pope and the emperor have stormed, the greater the progress which the gospel has made. . . . Why so ? Because I have never drawn the sword, nor called for vengeance ; because I have not had recourse either to tumult or revolt. I have committed all to God, and awaited his strong hand. It is neither with the sword nor the musket that Christians fight, but with suffering and the cross. Christ, their captain, did not handle the sword ; he hung upon the tree." 6 And when, June 25, A. D. 1530, the memorable confes- sion of Protestanism was made at Augsburg, that confession, framed under the direction of Luther, though absent, accord- ingly announced for all future time the principles of Prot- estantism upon the subject of Church and State. Upon this question that document declared as follows : t ld., book ix, chap, viil, par. 14. 6 Id., par. 22. 6 Id., book x, chaj). x, par. 19. PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. ' ' ARTICLE XXVIII. " OF ECCLESIASTICAL POWER. " There have been great controversies touching the power of the bishops, in which some have in an unseemly manner mingled together the ecclesiastical power, and the power of the sword. And out of this con- fusion there have sprung very great wars and tumults, while the pontiffs, trusting in the power of the keys, have not only instituted new kinds of service, and burdened men's consciences by reserving of cases, and by violent excommunications ; but have also endeavored to transfer worldly kingdoms from one to another, and to despoil emperors of their power and authority. These faults godly and learned men in the church have long since reprehended ; and for that cause ours were compelled, for the comforting of men^ consciences, to show the difference between the ecclesiastical power and the power of the sword. And they have taught that both of them, because of God's command, are dutifully to be reverenced and honored, as the chief blessings of God upon earth. "Now, their judgment is this : that the power of the keys, or the power of the bishops, according to the gospel, is a power or command from God, of preaching the gospel, of remitting or retaining sins, and of administering the sacraments. For Christ sends his apostles forth with this charge : ' As my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. Receive ye the Holy Ghost : Whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them ; and whosesoever sins ye retain, they are retained.' John xx, 21-23. ' Go, and preach the gospel to every creature,' etc. Mark xvi, 15. "This power is exercised only by teaching or preaching the gospel, and administering the sacraments, either to many, or to single individ- uals, in accordance with their call. For thereby not corporeal, but eternal things are granted ; as, an eternal righteousness, the Holy Ghost, life everlasting. These things cannot be obtained but by the ministry of the word and of the sacraments ; as Paul says, ' The gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth.' Rom. i, 16. See- ing, then, that the ecclesiastical power bestows things eternal, and is ex- ercised only by the ministry of the word, it does not hinder the civil government any more than the art of singing hinders civil government. For the civil administration is occupied about other matters, than is the gospel. The magistracy does not defend the souls, but the bodies, and bodily things, against manifest injuries ; and coerces men by the sword and corporal punishments, that it may uphold civil justice and peace. "Wherefore the ecclesiastical and the civil power are not to be con- founded. The ecclesiastical power has its own command, to preach the gospel and to administer the sacraments. Let it not by force enter into the office of another ; let it not transfer worldly kingdoms ; let it not PROTESTANTISM IS CHRISTIANITY. abrogate the magistrates' laws ; let it not withdraw from them lawful obedience ; let it not hinder judgments touching any civil ordinances or contracts; let it not prescribe laws to the magistrate touching the form of the State; as Christ says, 'My kingdom is not of this world.' John xviii, 36. Again : 'Who made me a judge or a divider over you?' Luke xii, 14. And Paul says, 'Our conversation is in heaven.' Phil, iii, 20. ' The weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God, to the pulling down of strongholds ; casting down imagi- nations, ' etc. 2 Cor. x, 4, 5. " In this way ours distinguish between the duties of each power, one from the other, and admonish all men to honor both powers, and to ac- knowledge both to be the gifts and blessings of God. "If the bishops have any power of the sword, they have it not as bishops by the command of the gospel, but by human law given unto them by kings and emperors, for the civil government of their goods. This, however, is another function than the ministry of the gospel. " When, therefore, the question is concerning the jurisdiction of bishops, civil government must be distinguished from ecclesiastical juris- diction. Again, according to the gospel, or, as they term it, by divine right, bishops, as bishops, that is, those who have the administration of the word and sacraments committed to them, have no other jurisdiction at all, but only to remit sin, also to inquire into doctrine, and to reject doctrine inconsistent with the gospel, and to exclude from the com- munion of the church wicked men, whose wickedness is manifest, without human force, but by the word. And herein of necessity the churches ought by divine right to render obedience unto them ; accord- ing to the saying of Christ, ' He that heareth you, heareth me.' Luke x, 16. But when they teach or determine anything contrary to the gos- pel, then the churches have a command of God which forbids obedience to them: 'Beware of false prophets.' Matt, vii, 15. 'Though an angel from heaven preach any other gospel, let him be accursed. ' Gal. i, 8. 'We can do nothing against the truth, but for the truth.' 2 Cor. xiii, 8. Also, 'This power the Lord hath given me to edification, and not to destruction.' 2 Cor. xiii, 10." This confession is a sound exposition of the doctrine of Christ concerning the temporal and the spiritual powers. It clearly and correctly defines the jurisdiction of the State to be only in things civil ; that the sword which is wielded by the powers that be, is to preserve civil justice and peace ; and that the authority of the State is to be exercised only 5T6 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. over the bodies of men and the temporal concerns of life, that is, of the affairs of this world. This shuts away the State from all connection or interference with things spir-- itual or religious. It separates entirely religion and the State. While doing this for the State, it also clearly defines the place of the church. While the State is to stand entirely aloof from spiritual and religious things and concern itself only with the civil and temporal affairs of men, the church on its part is to stand aloof from the affairs of the State, and is not to interfere in the civil and temporal concerns of men. The power of the church is not to be mingled with the power of the State. The power of the church is never to invade the realm, or seek to guide the jurisdiction, of the State. The duty of the clergy is to minister the gospel of Christ and not the laws of men. In dealing with its membership in the exercise of discipline, the church authorities are to act with- out human power, and solely by the word of God. The ministry of the gospel is with reference only to eternal things, and is not to trouble itself with political administration. This is Protestantism. This is Christianity. Wherever these principles have been followed, there is Protestantism exemplified in the Church and the State. Wherever these principles have not been followed, there is the principle of the papacy, it matters not what the profession may have been. THE LUTHERANS IN GERMANY. In his later years, having refused to walk in the advanc- ing light, and so having less of the word of God and there- fore less faith, even Luther swerved from the genuine Chris- tian and Protestant principle, denied any right of toleration to the Zwinglians, and advocated the banishment of " false teachers" and the utter rooting out of the Jews from "Christian" lands. 7 At Luther's death many Protestants set themselves to maintain the doctrines stated by him, and 7 Schaff's " History of the Christian Church," Vol. xiv, \ 11, par. 22, 23. ZWINGLE AS A REFORMER. 57? steadily refused to take a single advance step. These thus became Lutherans rather than Protestants, and thus was formed the Lutheran Church. And though this church to this day holds the Augsburg Confession as one of its chief symbols ; and though about the end of the seventeenth cent- ury "the Lutheran churches adopted the leading maxim of the Arminians, that Christians were accountable to God alone for their religious sentiments, and that no individual could be justly punished by the magistrate for his erroneous opinions, while he conducted himself like a virtuous and obedient subject, and made no attempts to disturb the peace and order of civil society" (Mosheim*} ; yet ever since the year 1817, the Lutheran Church has been a part of the Estab- lished Church of Prussia. And in the face of the declara- tions of the Augsburg Confession, the emperor of Germany to-day, as king of Prussia, is the supreme pontiff of the Lutheran Church in Prussia. In the Scandinavian countries also, the Lutheran Church is the State Church. THE REFORMATION IN SWITZERLAND. Zwingle, w~ho gave the cast to the Reformation in Switz- erland, sanctioned, if he did not really create there, the union of Church and State. His view was that the State is Christian. "The Reformer deserting the paths of the apos- tles, allowed himself to be led astray by the perverse ex- ample of popery." He himself " resolved to be at one and the same time the man of the State and of the Church, . . . at once the head of the State and general of the army this double, this triple, part of the Reformer was the ruin of the Reformation and of himself." For when war came on in Switzerland, Zwingle girded on his sword, and went with the troops to battle. ' ' Zwingle played two parts at once he was a reformer and a magistrate. But these are two char- acters that ought no more to be united than those of a min- ister and of a soldier. We will not altogether blame the 8 " Ecclesiastical History," Century xvii, sec. ii, part il, chap. 1, par. 16. 578 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. soldiers and the magistrates : in forming leagues and draw- ing the sword, even for the sake of religion, they act accord- ing to their point of view, although it is not the same as ours ; but we must decidedly blame the Christian minister who becomes a diplomatist or a general." He who took the sword, perished by the sword. In the first battle that was fought October 11, A. D. 1531 twenty-five of the Swiss reform preachers were slain, the chief of whom was Zwingle, who fell stricken with many blows. "If the German Reformer had been able to ap- proach Zwingle at this solemn moment and pronounce those oft-repeated words, ' Christians fight not with sword and arquebuse, but with sufferings and with the cross,' Zwingle would have stretched out his dying hand and said, ' Amen. ' r - THE REFORMATION IN ENGLAND. Although the Reformation was begun in England by Tyndale about the same time that it was commenced by Luther in Germany, it attracted N no public notice until 1521, when Henry VIII, as the doughty champion of the papacy, promptly took up the enforcement of the pope's bull ; and Luther's writings were publicly burnt in London, May 21. Cardinal Wolsey was master of ceremonies. " Before, a priest of a stately figure carried a rod, sur- mounted by a crucifix ; behind him another, no less stately, carried the archiepiscopal cross of York ; a nobleman, walk- ing at his side, carried his cardinal's hat. He was attended by nobles, prelates, embassadors of the pope and the emperor, and these were followed by a long train of mules, carrying trunks with the richest and most splendid coverings. At London, amidst this magnificent procession, the writings of the poor monk of Wittemberg were carried to the flames. Tor these quotations, under "Zwingle," see D'Aubigne's "History of the Reformation," book xvi, chap, iv, par. 1; chap, i, par. 7* chap, iv, par. 2: and chap, viii, par. 6 from the end. HENRY VTII. HENRY VIII AGAINST LUTHER. On arriving at the cathedral, the proud priest made even his cardinal's hat be placed upon the altar. The virtuous bishop of Rochester took his station at the foot of the cross, and there, in animated tone, inveighed against heresy. The impious writings of the heresiarch were then brought forward, and devoutly burned in presence of an immense crowd. Such was the first news which England received of the Reformation. " D^Aubignt. 10 But Henry was not content with this ; nor even with opposing the Reformation in his own dominions. He wrote to the Archduke Palatine of Germany, in the following words : "This fire, which has been kindled by Luther, and fanned by the arts of the devil, is raging everywhere. If Luther does not repent, deliver him and his audacious treatises to the flames. I offer you my royal co-operation, and even, if necessary, my life." 11 Nor did he stop here. He entered the lists as a theolo- gian, and wrote against Luther a book entitled the "De- fense of the Seven Sacraments Against Martin Luther, by the Most Invincible King of England, France, and Ireland, Henry, Eighth of the Name." In the book he set him- self forth as a sacrifice for the preservation of the church, and also proclaimed the papal principles, in the following words : " I will throw myself before the church, I will receive in my breast the poisoned darts of the enemy who is assailing her. To this the present state of affairs calls me. Every servant of Jesus Christ, whatever be his age, rank, or sex, must bestir himself against the common enemy of Christendom. " Let us arm ourselves with double armor with heavenly weapons, that by the arms of truth we may vanquish him who combats with the arms of error. But let us also arm ourselves with terrestrial armor, in order that, if he proves obstinate in his wickedness, the hand of the execu- tioner may constrain him to silence ; and he may thus, for once at least, be useful to the world by his exemplary punishment." 12 10 Id., book ix, chap, x, par. 9. n Id., book xviii, chap, v, par. 5, 12 Id., book ix, chap. x. par. 12. 580 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. He denounced Luther as "an infernal wolf, a venomous viper, a limb of the devil," and other such handsome things. By his partisans and flatterers, Henry's book was extolled to the skies. It was declared "the most learned work that ever the sun saw," and, appropriately enough indeed, it was compared with the works of St. Augustine. Henry himself they pronounced a Constantine, a Charle- magne, and even a second Solomon. Henry was no less pleased in fact with his performance, than the others pre- tended to be. He had his embassador at Rome deliver to the pope in person a copy of the book ; and the embassador, in presenting it to the pope, who received him in full con- sistory, said : "The king, my master, assures you that, after refuting the errors of Luther with his pen, he is ready to combat his adherents with the sword." 13 The grateful pope, as was to be expected, struck even yet a higher note of praise to Henry. Leo X replied that the book of the king of England could only have been com- posed with the aid of the Holy Spirit, and in return gave the embassador both his foot and his cheek to be kissed, saying, "I will do for your master's book as much as the church has done for St. Jerome and St. Augustine." To his cardinals Leo said, " "We must honor those noble cham- pions who show themselves prepared to cut off with the sword the rotten members of Jesus Christ. What title shall we give to the virtuous king of England ? " One suggested, "Protector of the Roman Church," another^ "Apostolic King ; " as the final result, a bull was issued by the pope, proclaiming Henry VIII "Defender of the Faith," and grant- ing ten years' indulgence to all who would read the king's book. The bull was promptly sent by a messenger to Henry, who of course M*as overjoyed when he received it. A moment after Henry received the bull, the king's fool entered the room. Henry's joy was so marked that the fool asked him the cause of it. The king replied, "The pope 13 Id., par. 17. LUTHER AGAINST THE PAPACY. 581 has just made me 'Defender of the Faith." The fool being the only wise man in the whole transaction, replied, "Ho! ho! good Harry, let you and me defend one an- other ; but take my word for it, let the faith alone to defend itself." Henry decided that the new dignity thus bestowed upon him should be publicly proclaimed. " Seated upon an elevated throne, with the cardinal at his right hand, he caused the pope's letter to be read in public. The trumpets sounded ; Wolsey said mass ; the king and his court took their seats around a sumptuous table, and the heralds-at- anns proclaimed, " Ilenricus Dei gratia Rex Angliae ef Franciae, Defensor Fidei et Dominus Jliberniae ! " "Henry, by the grace of God king of England and France, defender of the faith, and lord of Ireland." " Thus was acquired by the sovereign of England, the title and dignity of "Defender of the Faith," which has been worn by all the successors of Henry, and is held to-day by Queen Yictoria. Luther was not the man to keep silence, not even when kings spoke. lie had faced the emperor ; he had defied the pope ; and now he both contemns and defies Henry, and all the rest of the papal brood together. Besides meeting and overthrowing the king's arguments in detail, his ringing words of defiance of the papacy, and his faith in the word of God only and its power, were a call to all Europe to take refuge under the standard of the Reformation, and are worthy forever to be held in remembrance. The opening and the closing of his reply to Henry is as follows : " I will not deal mildly with the king of England ; it is in vain (I know it is) to humble myself, to yield, beseech, and try the ways of peace. I will at length show myself more terrible than the ferocious beasts who are constantly butting me with their horns. I will let them feel mine ; I will preach and irritate Satan until he wears himself out, and falls down exhausted. 'If this heretic retracts not,' says the new Thomas, Henry VIII, 'he must be burnt.' Such are the weapons now employed against me ; first, the fury of stupid asses and Thomastical swine, and then the fire. \ 7 ery well ! Let these swine come for- 14 /rf., book xviii, chap, v, par. 10-12. 582 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. ward, if they dare, and burn me ! Here I am, waiting for them. My wish is, that my ashes, thrown, after my death, into a thousand seas, may arise, pursue, and engulf this abominable crew. Living, I will be the enemy of the papacy ; burnt, I will be its destruction. Go, swine of St. Thomas ; do what seemeth to you good. You shall ever find Luther as a bear in your way, and a lion in your path. He will thunder upon you from all quarters, and leave you no peace until he has brayed your brains of iron, and ground to powder your foreheads of brass. For me, I cease not to cry, 'The gospel ! the gospel ! Christ ! Christ !' while my opponents cease not to reply, ' Customs ! customs ! ordinances ! ordi- nances ! Fathers ! Fathers ! ' ' Let your faith,' says St. Paul, ' stand not in tlie wisdom of men, but in the power of God.' And the apostle, by this thunderbolt from heaven, overthrows and scatters, like the dust before the wind, all the silly crotchets of this Henry. To all the sayings of Fa- thers, men, angels, devils, I oppose not the antiquity of custom, not the multitude, but the word of the Eternal Majesty, the gospel, which they themselves are constrained to approve. By it I hold ; on it I rest ; in it I glory, triumph, and exult over papists, Thomists, Henrys, and all the hellish sty. The King of heaven is with me, and therefore I fear noth- ing, even should a thousand Augustines, a thousand Cyprians, and a thousand churches, of which Henry is defender, rise up against me. It is a small matter for me to despise and lash an earthly king, who himself has not feared, in his writing, to blaspheme the King of heaven, and pro- fane his holiness by the most audacious falsehood. Papists ! Will you not desist from your vain pursuits ? Do as you please, the result, however, must be, that before the gospel which I, Martin Luther, have preached, popes, bishops, priests, monks, princes, devils, death, sin, and whatever is not Jesus Christ or in Jesus Christ, shall fall and perish." 15 Soon, however, Henry wanted a divorce from his wife, Catherine, that he might marry Anne Boleyn. The pope, Clement VII, proposed to grant him his wish, and actually signed a "decretal by which he himself annulled the mar- riage between Henry and Catherine." He also " signed a valid engagement by which he declared beforehand that all retractation of these acts should be null android" ZPAu- ~bign6. v> Both these documents were committed to the legate, Compeggio, whom he was sending to England pro- fessedly to conduct the proceedings and accomplish the fact 15 Id., book ix, chap, x, par. 20-24. 16 Id., book xix, last chap., last par. but one. HENRY DIVORCES THE POPE. 583 of the divorce ; but at the same time gave him positive com- mand that he must n^ver let the decretal go out of his hands. Compeggio departed for England ; the political winds sud- denly veered, messengers were sent with all speed after him, directing him to delay both his journey, and all the proceed- ings as much as possible ; and especially commanding him not to use the decretal, nor take any other step favorable to the divorce, without a new and express order from the pope himself. The outcome of it all was that the pope, finding it impracticable under the circumstances to offend the emperor, who was Catherine's nephew, played so long his lingering game with Henry, with the hope of holding both sover- eigns, that Henry grew impatient, and divorced both Cather- ine and the pope. This being accomplished, he proceeded at once, A. D. 1533, to put Anne Boleyn in the place of Catherine, as queen ; and himself in the place of the pope, as head of the church in England. It was in the fullest sense of the word that Henry put himself in the place of the pope in the realm of England. In 1534- the " Act of Supremacy" was passed by Par- liament, by which "authority in. all matters ecclesiastical was vested solely in the crown. The courts spiritual became as thoroughly the king's courts as the temporal courts at AVestminster. The statute ordered that the king ' shall be taken, accepted, and reputed the only supreme head on earth of the Church of England, and shall have and enjoy, an- nexed and united to the imperial crown of this realm, as well the title and state thereof as all the honors, jurisdic- tions, authorities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity belonging, and with full power to visit, repress, redress, reform, and amend all such errors, her- esies, abuses, contempts, and enormities which by any man- ner of spiritual authority or jurisdiction might or may lawfully be reformed.'" Green. 11 The very pattern of the Inquisition was established in England. At the close of 1534 a statute was made which 17 " Larger History of the English People," book v, chap, iv, par. 16. 45 584 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. declared to be treason "the denial of any of the king's titles," and as the king in 1535 assumed, the title, " On earth supreme head of the Church of England," anj denial of his headship of the church was therefore treason ; and Thomas Cromwell pushed this principle to the utmost limit. "Spies were scattered broadcast over the land, secret denunciations poured into the open ear of the minister. The air was thick with tales of plots and conspiracies. . . . The confessional had no secrets from Cromwell. Men's talk with their closest friends found its way to his ear. Words idly spoken, the murmurs of a petulant abbot, the ravings of a moonstruck nun, were, as the nobles cried passionately at his fall, tor- tured into treason. The only chance of safety lay in silence. But even the refuge of silence was closed by a law more infamous than any that has ever blotted the statute-book of England. Not only was thought made treason, but men were forced to reveal their thoughts on pain of their very silence being punished with the penalties of treason. All trust in the older bulwarks of liberty was destroyed by a policy as daring as it was unscrupulous. The noblest institu- tions were degraded into instruments of terror." - Green. 1 * That which was now the Church of England was simply that which before was the Catholic Church in England. "In form nothing had been changed. The outer Constitu- tion of the church remained entirely unaltered." In faith, likewise, nothing had been changed in fact, except in the mere change of the personages who assumed the prerogative of dispensers of it. Henry, as both king and pope, was now the supreme head of the church. "From the primate to the meanest deacon, every minister of it derived from him his sole right to exercise spiritual powers. The voice of its preachers was the echo of his will. He alone could define orthodoxy or declare heresy. The forms of its worship and belief were changed and rechanged at the royal caprice." For as early as 1532, Henry had laid down the proposition that " the king's majesty hath as well the care of the souls 18 Id., par. 21, 3. RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN ENGLAND. 585 of his subjects as their bodies ; and may by the law of God by his Parliament make laws touching and concerning as well the one as the other." - Green. Such was the "Reformation" accomplished by "Henry, Eighth of the Name," so far as in him and his intention lay. But to be divorced from the pope of Rome was a great thing for England. And as Henry had set the example of revolt from papal rule when exercised from the papal throne, the English people were not slow in following the example thus set, and revolting from the same rule when exercised from the English throne. It began even in Henry's reign, in the face of -all the terrors of a rule "which may be best de- scribed by saying that it was despotism itself personified. "- Macanday During the regency of Edward YI and under the guidance of Cranmer and Ridley, advance steps were taken even by the Church of England itself the use of images, of the crucifix, of incense, tapers, and holy water ; the sacrifice of the mass, the worship of saints, auricular confession, the service in Latin, and the celibacy of the clergy, were abolished. During the Catholic reaction under Mary, the spirit of revolt was confirmed ; and under Eliza- beth, when the polity of the Church of England became fixed, and thenceforward, it constantly, and at times almost universally, prevailed. In short, the example set by Henry has been so well and so persistently followed through the ages that have since passed, that, although the Church of England still subsists, and, although the sovereign of England still remains the head of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith, both the office and the title are of so flexible a character that they easily adapt themselves to the headship and defense of the faith of Episcopalianism in England and of Presbyterianism in Scotland. And yet even more and far better than this, the present sovereign of England, Queen Victoria, has dis- tinctly renounced the claim of right to rule in matters of 19 Id., book vi, chap, i, parr 5, 1, and book v, chap, iv, par. 13. 20 Essays, "Hallam," par. 27. 586 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. faith. In 1859 Her Majesty issued a royal proclamation to her subjects in India, in which she said these words : "Firmly relying, ourselves, on the truth of Christianity, and ac- knowledging with gratitude the solace of religion, we disclaim alike the right and the desire to impose our convictions on any of our subjects. We declare it to be our royal will and pleasure that none be in any wise favored, none molested or disquieted, by reason of their religious faith or observances, but that all shall alike enjoy the equal and impartial pro- tection of the law ; and we do strictly charge and enjoin all those who may be in authority under us that they abstain from all interference with the religious belief or worship of any of our subjects, on pain of our highest displeasure. " And it is our further will that, so far as may be, our subjects, of whatever race or creed, be freely and impartially admitted to offices in our service, the duties of which they maybe qualified by their education, ability, and integrity to discharge." CALVINISM IN GENEVA. The views of Calvin on the subject of Church and State, were as thoroughly theocratic as the papal system itself. Augustine was his master and model throughout. When at the age of twenty-eight, at the urgent call of Farel, Calvin settled in Geneva, he drew up a condensed statement of Christian doctrine, in fact a synopsis of his "Institutes," consisting of twenty-one articles which all the citizens were called up in bunches of ten each, " To profess and swear to, as the confession of their faith." This method of making a Calvinistic city was gone through with, Calvin himself said, 'with much satisfaction." This oath and confession of faith were made as citizens, not particularly as church mem- bers. They were not asked whether they were converted ; they were not required to be church members ; but simply as men and citizens, were required to take the oath and accept this as the confession of their faith. In fact, the oath of allegiance as a citizen, and the con- fession of fa;th as a Christian, were identical. This was at once to make the Church and the State one and the same thing JOHN CALVIN. THE CALVINISTIC THEOCRACY. 587 with the Church above the State. Yea, more than this, it was wholly to swallow up the civil in the ecclesiastical power ; for the preachers were supreme. It was but another man-made theocracy, after the model of the papacy. In- deed, according to Calvin's "Institutes," the very reason of existence of the State, is only as the support and the servant of the church ; and accordingly, when the magistrate inflicts punishment, he is to be regarded as executing the judgment of God. " What we see on the banks of the Leman is a theocracy ; Jehovah was its head, the Bible was the supreme code, and the government exercised a presiding and paternal guardianship over all interests and causes, civil and spirit- ual." Wylie* 1 Serious difficulty, however, arose, when it came to en- forcing the strictness of scriptural morality, and the Calvin- istic restrictions regarding the dress and manner of life of the citizens which the two preachers had adopted. 22 All who had been made Christian citizens by the machine method before mentioned, resented it, and desired that the strictness of discipline should be modified. This the preachers looked upon as an attempt of the civil power to dictate in spiritual matters, and they refused to yield in the least degree. The people insisted, and the preachers stood firm. The dissen- sion soon grew so violent that the preachers refused to adminis- ter the sacraments to the people ; then the people rose up and banished them from the city, A. D. 1539. Calvin went to Strasburg, where he remained two years, during which time much disorder prevailed in Geneva, and the friends of Calvin insisted all the time that if only he were recalled, order could be restored. In 1541 the decree of banishment was revoked, and at "the earnest entreaties 21 " History of Protestantism," book xiv, chap, x, last par. but one. 22 Id. Everybody had to be at home by nine o'clock at night ; and hotel keepers were required to see that this rule was observed by their guests. Rules were made "restraining excess in dress, and profusion at meals; " and every- body was required to attend both preaching and other religious serrices. 588 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. of the Genevese, Calvin returned." He was no less de- termined than before to have his own way, and to make his will absolute ; and the circumstances under which he re- turned, paved the way for him to execute his will as he was not suffered to do before. "He entered upon his work with a firm determination to carry out those reforms which he had originally purposed, and to set up in all its integrity that form of church policy which he had carefully matured during his residence at Strasburg." The town was divided into parishes, with an elder or some one appointed by the council of elders, in charge of each parish, to see that disci- pline was observed. " His system of church polity was essentially theocratic ; it assumed that every member of the State was also under the discipline of the church ; and he asserted that the right of exercising this discipline was vested exclusively in the consistory, or l)ody of preachers and elders. His attempts to carry out these views brought him into collision both with the authorities and with the populace, the latter being en- raged at the restraints imposed upon the disorderly by the exercise of church discipline, and the former being inclined to retain in their own hands a portion of that power in things spiritual, which Calvin was bent on placing exclu- sively in the hands of the church rulers. His dauntless courage, his perseverance, and his earnestness at length pre- vailed, and he had the satisfaction, before he died, of seeing his favorite system of church polity firmly established, not only at Geneva, but in other parts of Switzerland, and of knowing that it had been adopted substantially by the Re- formers in France and Scotland. ]Sor was it only in relig- ious matters that Calvin busied himself ; ^nothing was indif- ferent to him that concerned the welfare and good order of the State or the advantage of its citizens. His work, as has been justly said, 'embraced everything;' he was consulted on every affair, great and small, that came before the coun- cil, on questions of law, policy, economy, trade, and CALVIN'S DESPOTISM. 589 manufactures, no less than 011 questions of doctrine and church polity ."- Encyclopedia Britannica.** It is plain that when every member of the State was subject to the discipline of the Church, and when this discipline was exercised exclusively by the body of preachers and elders with Calvin at the head of that body, his power was practi- cally unlimited. And by this it is further evident that the system there made and established by Calvin, was but the papal system over again, with Calvin as pope. 21 And the use which he made of the power with which he was thus clothed, shows that he was as ready to exert the authority, as he was to sit in the place, of a pope. 'The people having just thrown off the yoke of the pope of Rome, were not all ready to bear with meekness the yoke of the pope of Geneva. One of the first to speak out, was Gruet, who attacked him "vigorously on his supremacy, called him " bishop of Asculurn," and '' the new pope." Among other points of dissent, Gruet denied the immortality of the soul. He may have been an infidel, but it is not certain ; at any rate, he was brought before the council, by which he was condemned and punished with death. Another who dis- sented was Castalio, master of the public schools of Geneva. He attacked Calvin's doctrine of unconditional predestina- tion. He was deposed from his office and banished. An- other was Jerome Bolsec, a monk who had been converted to Protestantism. He, too, attacked the doctrine of absolute decrees. He was thrown into prison, and after a two days' debate with Calvin before the council, was banished. Out of this grew still another. Jacques de Bourgogne, a lineal descendant of the dukes of Burgundy, and an inti- mate friend and patron of Calvin, had settled at Geneva solely to have the pleasure of his company. Bourgogne had 23 Article "Calvin." It was written by W. Lindsay Alexander, D. D., one of the Bible revisers, and is clearly favorable to him. 24 Hallam describes him as " a sort of prophet-king," in " Constitutional History," chap, iv, par. 13, note. 590 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. employed Bolsec as his physician, and when Bolsec became involved in his difficulty with Calvin, Bourgogne came to his support, and tried to prevent his ruin. This so incensed Calvin that he turned his attention to the nobleman, who was obliged to leave Geneva, lest a worse thing should befall him. Another, and the most notable of all the victims of Calvin's theocracy, was Servetus, who had opposed the Catholic doctrine of the Trinity, and also infant baptism ; and had published a book entitled " Christianity Restored," in which he declared his sentiments. At the instance and by the aid of Calvin, he had been prosecuted by the papal Inquisition, and condemned to death for blasphemy and heresy, but he escaped from their prison in Dauphine, in France, and in making his way to Italy, passed through Geneva, and there remained a short time. He was just about to start for Zurich, when at the instigation of Calvin, he "was seized, and out of the book before mentioned, was accused of blasphemy. The result, as everybody knows, was that he was burned to death. The followers of Serve- tus were banished from Geneva. Calvin's system of government was not confined to Geneva, however, nor did his idea die with him. It occu- pies almost as large a place in the subsequent history as does the papacy itself, of which throughout it is so close a counterpart. He himself tried during the reign of Edward YI to have it adopted in England. " He urged Cranmer to call together pious and rational men, educated in the school of God, to meet and agree upon one uniform confession of doctrine according to the rule of Scripture," declaring: "As for me, if I can be made use of, I will sail through ten seas to bring it about. ^-- Bancroft.^ 25 " History of the United States," chap. " Prelates and Puritans," par. 11. It is not without reason that, by one of his admirers, Calvin has been compared with Innocent III. Wylle's " History of Protestantism," book xiv, end of chap, xx.lv. &ELIGIOUS DESPOTISM IN SCOTLAND. 591 All his personal effort in this direction failed, however. He died May 27, A. D. 1564. CALVINISM IN SCOTLAND. It was stated above that before his death Calvin had the satisfaction, of knowing that his system of church polity had been adopted in Scotland. No doubt this furnished him much satisfaction indeed. But if he could only have lived to see the time when that system was being worked in Scot- land according to its perfect ideal, we may well believe that he would have fairly wept in the fullness of his un- speakable joy. From A. D. 1638 to 1662, under the Covenanters, the Calvinistic system was supreme in Scotland; and "the arrogance of the ministers' pretensions and the readiness with which these pretensions were granted ; the appalling conceptions of the Deity which were inculcated, 'and the absence of all contrary expression of opinion ; the intrusions on the domain of the magistrate ; the vexatious interference in every detail of family and commercial life, and the patience with which it was borne, are to an English reader alike amazing. 'We acknowledge,' said they, 'that accord- ing to the latitude of the word of God (which is our theame), we are allowed to treate in an ecclesiastical way of greatest and smallest, from the king's throne that should be estab- lished in righteousness, to the merchant's balance that should be used in faithfulness.' The liberality of the inter- pretation given to this can only be judged of after minute reading." Encyclopedia Britannica In fact it was "one of the most detestable tyrannies ever seen on the earth. When the Scotch Kirk was at the height of its power, we may search history in vain for any institu- tion which can compete with it, except the Spanish Inquisi- tion. Between these two, there is a close arid intimate 26 Article " Presbyterianism," par. 32. 592 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. analogy. Both were intolerant, both were cruel, both made war upon the finest parts of human nature, and both de- stroyed every vestige of religious freedom."- Buckle.* 1 PURITANISM AND THE NEW ENGLAND THEOCRACY. After Scotland, it was in Puritan New England that the Calvinistic system of government most nearly reached its ideal. The rise of the Puritans was on this wise : To escape the persecutions by Mary, in her attempt to restore Catholicism as the religion of England, many members of the Church of England fled to Germany. The worship of these while in exile was conducted by some with the rites of the Church of England as established under Edward VI, while others adopted the Swiss or Calvinistic form of worship. This caused a division, and much contention between them. " The chief scene of these disturbances was Frankfort." John Knox took the leadership of those who were inclined to Calvinism, while Cox, who afterward became bishop of Ely, was the chief of those who defended the forms of the Church of England. Those who maintained the English form of worship were called Conformists, and those who advocated Calvinistic forms, were called 2f on- Conformists. The contentions finally grew so bitter that the Conformists drove the Non- Conformists out of the city. At the accession of Elizabeth, November, 1558, the exiles returned to England carrying their differences with them. There the Non-Conformists acquired the nick-name of "Puri- tans." "A Puritan, therefore, was a man of severe morals, a Calvinist in doctrine, and a Non-Conformist to the cere- monies and discipline of the Church [of England], though 27 " History of Civilization," Vol. il, chap, v, last par. To this "famous chapter " the reader is confidently referred as the best and most fruitful result of that " minute reading " which is above said to be requisite to enable a person to judge concerning the system. THE RISE OF THE PURITANS. 593 they did not totally separate from it." - Neal Yet more than this : they were not only not separate from the Church of England, but it was not the purpose of the Puritans to separate from either the church, or the government, of En- gland. It was their set purpose to remain in, and a part of, both, to "reform" both, and create and establish instead a Puritan Church of England, and a Puritan government of England. The controversy, as already stated, turned upon the forms of worship whether the clergy shouftl wear vest- ments, whether the church should be governed by bishops, about cathedral churches, and the archdeacons, deans, canons, and other officials of the same ; about festivals and holy-days ; the sign of the cross, god-fathers, god-mothers, etc. The Conformists held firmly to the form of worship as established under Edward VI ; the Puritans insisted on go- ing the full length in renouncing all the remaining forms and ceremonies. The queen was not in favor of adopting even the system established under Edward, but inclined yet more toward the papal system. Under the circumstances, she rather connived at the efforts of the Puritan party until she had made herself secure on the throne. In addition to this, many seeing the queen herself neglecting the forms enjoined by statute, did the same thing. The result was that the Puritan principles so grew in favor that in the con- vocation of 1502, when a motion was made to abolish most of the usages in dispute, it was lost by only a single vote, the vote standing fifty-eight for the motion and fifty-nine against it. 29 As Elizabeth saw that the Puritan party was rapidly growing, she thought to check it by enforcing uniformity according to the established usage. In this she was zeal- ously supported, if not rather led, by the archbishop of Canterbury. This attempt at coercion 1567 caused the 28 "History of the Puritans," preface, par. 6. '" J Hallam's "Constitutional History," chap, iv, par. 5. 594 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Puritans to add to their objections to caps, surplices, tippets, etc., a strong dislike for the whole system of episcopacy, and a stronger determination to substitute for it the Presby- terian form of ecclesiastical polity. And as "it is manifest that the obstinacy of bold and sincere men is not to be quelled by any punishments that do not exterminate them, and that they were not likely to entertain a less conceit of their own reason when they found no arguments so much relied on to refute it as that of force" (IZallam 30 ), the inev- itable consequence was that the efforts to enforce uniformity only caused non-conformity to grow more determined and more prevalent. The Puritans had now grown into a powerful party, and, owing to the difficulties of her position, Elizabeth, whose interest in any matter of religion unless that perhaps of the papal was more political than anything else, might have been even yet brought to assent to some of their demands if the Puritans could have been content with any- thing like moderation. But they now made such extrav- agant demands, and asserted such extreme doctrines, that it became at once apparent that they would be content with nothing less than the utter subversion of the State, and the establishment in England of the system by which Calvin had ruled Geneva. About 1570 this movement took definite shape ; and among the leaders in the movement, ' ' Thomas Cartwright was the chief. He had studied at Geneva ; he returned with a fanatical faith in Calvinism, and in the system of church government which Calvin had devised ; and as Margaret professor of divinity at Cambridge, he used to the full the opportunities which his chair gave him of propagating his opinions. No leader of a religious party ever deserved less of after sympathy. Cartwright was unquestionably learned and devout, but his bigotry was that of a mediaeval in- quistor. The relics of the old ritual, the cross in baptism, 30 /d., par. 3 from the end. PURITAN DESIGNS UPON ENGLAND. 595 the surplice, the giving of a ring in marriage, were to him not merely distasteful, as they were to the Puritans at large ; they were idolatrous, and the mark of the beast. " His declamation against ceremonies and superstition, however, had little weight with Elizabeth or her primates ; what scared them was his most reckless advocacy of a scheme of ecclesiastical government which placed the State beneath the feet of the Church. The absolute rule of bish- ops, indeed, Cartwright denounced as begotten of the devil, but the absolute rule of presbyters he held to be established by the word of God. For the church modeled after the fashion of Geneva he claimed an authority which surpassed the wildest dreams of the masters of the Vatican. All spiritual authority and jurisdiction, the decreeing of doc- trine, the ordering of ceremonies, lay wholly in the hands of the ministers of the church. To them belonged the supervision of public morals. In an ordered arrangement of classes and synods, these presbyters were to govern their flocks, to regulate their own order, to decide in matters of faith, to administer 'discipline.' Their weapon was excom- munication, and they were responsible for its use to none but Christ." Green. 31 The actual relation which the State was to bear toward the Church, the magistrates toward the ecclesiastics, was set forth as follows, in a "Second Admonition to Parliament," -1572 by "the legislator" of the proposed Puritan re- public : "It must be remembered that civil magistrates must govern' the church according to the rules of God prescribed in his word, and that as they are nurses, so they be servants uuto the church ; and as they rule in the church, so they must remember to submit themselves unto the church, to submit their scepters, to throw down their crowns before the church, yea, as the prophet speaketh, to lick the dust off the feet of the church." Cartwright.^ 31 " Larger History of England," book vi, chap, v, par. 31. 32 Quoted by Hallam, "Constitutional History," chap, iv, par. 13. 596 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. "The province of the civil ruler in such a system of re- ligion as this, was simply to carry out the decisions of the presbyters, ' to see their decrees executed, and to punish the contemners of them.' Nor was this work of the civil power likely to be light work. The spirit of Calvinistic Presbyterianism excluded all toleration of practice or belief. Not only was the rule of ministers to be established as the legal form of church government, but all other forms, Episcopa- lian or Separatist, were to be ruthlessly put down. For heresy there was the punishment of death. Never had the doctrine of persecution been urged with such a blind and reckless ferocity. ' I deny, ' wrote Cartwright, ' that upon repent- ance there ought to follow any pardon of death. . . . Here- tics ought to be put to death now. If this be bloody and ex- treme, I am content to be so counted with the Holy Ghost ! ' "The violence of language such as this was as unlikely as the dogmatism of his theological teaching, to commend Cartwright's opinions to the mass of Englishmen. Popular as the Presbyterian system became in Scotland, it never took any popular hold on England. It remained to the last a clerical, rather than a national, creed ; and even in the moment of its seeming triumph under the commonwealth, it was rejected by every part of England save London and Lancashire. 33 But the bold challenge which Cartwright's 33 It was for good cause that it was so rejected ; for even before the death of Charles I, the Presbyterian Parliament had dealt " the fiercest blow at religious freedom which it had ever received." "An 'Ordinance for the Suppression of Blasphemies and Heresies,' which Vane and Cromwell had long held at bay, was passed by triumphant majorities. Any man, ran this terrible statute, denying the doctrine of the Trinity or of the divinity of Christ, or that the books of Scripture are the 'word of God,' or the resurrection of the body, or a future day of judgment, and refusing on trial to abjure his heresy, ' shall suffer the pain of death.' Any man declaring (among a long list of other errors) 'that man by nature hath free will to turn to God,' that there is a purgatory, that images are lawful, that infant baptism is unlawful ; any one denying the obligation of observing the Lord's day, or asserting ' that the church government by presby. tery is anti-Christian or unlawful,' shall, on refusal to renounce his errors, ' be commanded to prison.'" Green's " Larger History of England," book vii, chap, f, par. U. ELIZABETH PERSECUTES TUB PURITANS. 597 party delivered to the government in 1572, in an 'Admoni- tion to the Parliament,' which denounced the government of bishops as contrary to the word of God, and demanded the establishment in its place of government by presbyters, raised a panic among English statesmen and prelates, which cut off all hopes of a quiet treatment of the merely ceremonial questions which really troubled the consciences of the more advanced Protestants. The natural progress of opinion abruptly ceased, and the moderate thinkers who had pressed for a change in ritual which would have satisfied the zeal of the Reformers, withdrew from union with a party which revived the worst pretensions of the papacy." Green. 341 From this time forward, Elizabeth, her most active agency still being the archbishop of Canterbury and his subjects, exerted all her power to crush the Puritans. And though the persecution was cruel, they bore it all with patience ; first, because every effort that was made to crush them only multiplied their fame and influence a hundred-fold, and, second, because they lived in strong hope that better days, if not their actual triumph, would come when Elizabeth was gone. And as Elizabeth steadily refused to marry, and thus cut off every possibility of heirship to the throne through her, the hopes of the Puritans strengthened as her age increased ; because James of Scotland was next in the line of succession, and was not Presbyterianism established in Scotland ? And had not James in 1590, with his Scottish bonnet off and his hands raised to heaven declared : " I praise God that I was born in the time of the light of the gospel, and in such a place as to be king of such a church, the sincerest [purest] kirk in the world. The church of Geneva keep Pasche and Yule [Easter and Christmas] ; what have they for them ? They have no institution. As for our neighbor Kirk of England, their services are an evil-said mass in English ; they want nothing of the mass but the lift- ings. I charge you, my good ministers, doctors, elders, nobles, gentle- men, and barons, to stand to your purity, and to exhort the people to do 45 ** Id., book vi, chap, v, par. 81. 598 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. the same ; and I, forsooth, as long as I brook my life, shall maintain the same" ? 35 And had lie not in 1591, written a letter to Elizabeth re- questing her to ' ' show favor to Mr. Cartwright and his brethren, because of their great learning and faithful travels in the gospel r ? Was not James therefore a good Presby- terian ? And would he not surely put the Puritans in their long-coveted position in England ? Elizabeth died March 2-t, 1603, and was at once suc- ceeded by James. Before he left Scotland for London to be crowned king of England, he gave public thanks to God in the church of Edinburgh, that he was leaving "both kirk and kingdom in that state which he intended not to alter any ways, his subjects living in peace."- Neal. This, however, as well as the speech before quoted, was but a piece of that "kingcraft" upon which James prided himself. He had been brought up under Calvinistic disci- pline in Scotland, and had enough of it ; and as a matter of fact, he was only too glad of the opportunity to break loose from all Presbyterian and Puritan influence ; and this oppor- tunity he used to the full when he reached London. He called a conference of the two church parties, at which he openly took his stand for Episcopacy and the Church of England as it was, and renounced all connection with the Puritans, or favor for them. He told the Puritans in the conference, "If this be all your party have to say, I will make them conform, or I will harrie them out of the land, or else worse hang them, that's all." Not long afterward, he declared in his council of State, that "his mother and he from their cradles had been haunted with a Puritan devil, which he feared would not leave him to his grave ; and that he would hazard his crown but he would suppress those malicious spirits." -Bancroft.' 1 ''' Accordingly he issued a proclama- tion commanding all Puritans to conform or suffer the full 35 "Neal's History of tbe Puritans," part ii, chap, i, par. 2. M Id. 37 "History of the United States," chap. " The Pilgrims," par. 8. ORIGIN OF THE CONGREGATIONALISTS. 599 extremity of the laws, and the archbishop of Canterbury followed it up " with unrelenting rigor." Meanwhile, some of the Puritans seeing that the pros- pect from new Presbytery, was but the same as from old priest, only writ large, drew off from the Puritan party, as well as from the Church of England, and advocated a com- plete separation from both systems as to church govern- ment. They held that each church or assembly of worship- ers is entirely independent of all others, and self-governing ; that all points of doctrine or discipline are to be submitted to the congregation for discussion and final decision ; and that each congregation should elect its own pastor, etc. For this reason they were called Independents or Congregctr tionalists, and were nicknamed Separatists. Upon these the wrath of both Puritans and Conformists was poured with about equal virulence. As early as 1567, one of these Congregations was formed in London ; but it was forcibly broken up, thirty-one of its members being imprisoned for nearly a year. Persecution, however, only caused their numbers to grow, and by 15T6 they formed a distinct sect under the leadership of Robert Brown, from whom they were again nicknamed Brownists. . -And still they were subject to the enmity of both old ecclesiastical parties. Their meetings were broken up by mobs, and "the result to individuals is described as follows, by one who wrote at the time an account of a "tumult in Fleet street, raised by the disorderly preachment, pratings, and prat- tlings of a swarm of Separatists : "At length they catcht one of them alone, but they kickt him so vehemently as if they meant to beat him into a jelly. It is ambiguous whether they have kil'd him or no, but for a certainty they did knock him about as if they meant to pull him to pieces. I confesse it had been no matter if they had beaten tlje whole tribe in the like manner." 38 Ill 1592 Bacon wrote concerning them: "As for those which we call Brownists, being, when they were at the "Beginnings of New England," p. 67. 600 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. most, a very small number of very silly and base people, here and there in corners dispersed, they are now, thanks to God, by the good remedies that have been used, suppressed and worn out ; so that there is scarce any news of them." 39 Yet in 1593 there were twenty thousand of them ; and in the same year, at the order of Archbishop Whitgift, three of their leading men were hanged, two of whom had already been in prison seven years. The crime of which they were convicted and for which they were executed, was "separa- tion from the Church of England." The attitude and the words of King James, were simply a proclamation of the continuance of the war which Eliza- beth had already waged against the Puritans and Congrega- tionalists, and caused the Separatist principles and numbers more to grow. The chief of the Separatists was now William Brewster, a prominent man of Scrooby. Assisted by John Robinson, he organized a congregation in 1606, which held its meetings in his own drawing-room at Scrooby Manor. They were so persecuted and abused by all classes, as well as by the officers of the law, that in 1608 they fled to Holland, stopping first at Amsterdam, and afterward going to Leyden in 1609. From there a company of these PILGRIMS sailed, and landed at Plymouth, New England, in 1620. The success of this venture suggested to the Puritans a new scheme. Was not here an opportunity to establish a complete and unabridged Puritan government ? And was not the way fully opened, and the opportunity easy to be improved ? Enough ! They would do it. The scheme was talked about, pamphlets were written, a company was formed, a grant of land was obtained, and John Endicott, with a company of sixty, was sent over in 1628. They joined a fishing settlement at the place afterward called Salem on Massachusetts Bay. 39 Bancroft's "History of the United States," chap. "Prelates and Puri- tans," par. 3 from the end. PURITAN GOVERNMENT IN NEW ENGLAND. 601 In 1629 a royal charter was obtained, creating "The Government and Colony of Massachusetts Bay in New En- gland ; " and four hundred and six people, led by Francis Higginson, were sent over, and Endicott became governor of the whole colony. A Puritan or Calvinistic government was at once estab- lished and put into working order. A church was immedi- ately organized according to the Congregational form, with Higginson and Samuel Skelton as the ministers. All, how- ever, were not inclined to Puritanism. Two persons of the former company at Salem, John and Samuel Browne, took the lead in worshiping according to their own wish, conduct- ing their service after the Episcopal order, using the book of common prayer. Their worship was forbidden. The Brownes replied, " You are Separatists, and you will shortly be Anabaptists." The Puritans answered, "We separate, not from the Church of England, but from its corruptions. We came away from the common prayer and ceremonies, in our native land, where we suffered much for non-conformity ; in this place of liberty we cannot, we will not, use them. Their imposition would be a sinful violation of the worship of God." 40 In return the Brownes were rebuked as Separa- tists ; their defense was pronounced sedition ; their worship was declared mutiny ; and they were sent back to England as "factious and evil-conditioned men," Endicott declaring that "New England was no place for such as they." Higginson died in the winter of 1629-30. In 1630 there came over another company led by John Winthrop and Thomas Dudley, who were the governor and deputy- governor to succeed Endicott. "Their embarkation in 1630 was the signal of a general movement on the part of the English Puritans. Before Christmas of that year seven- teen ships had come to New England, bringing more than one thousand passengers." -Flake. " Dudley's views of 40 Bancroft's "History of the United States," chap. "New England's Planta- tion," last par. but one. 41 " Beginnings of New England," pp. 103, 104. 602 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. toleration and liberty of conscience are expressed in the following lines, which he wrote : "Let men of God in courts and churches watch ' O'er such as do a toleration hatch, Lest that ill egg bring forth a cockatrice To poison all with heresy and vice." 42 And Winthrop's estimate of the 'preachers is seen in his declaration that " I honored a faithful minister in my heart, and could have kissed his feet." 43 It was therefore not at all strange that under the government of Winthrop and Dudley in 1631, the following law should be enacted : " To the end this body of the commons may be preserved of honest and good men, it is ordered and agreed that, for the time to come, no man shall be admitted to the freedom of this body politic but such as are members of some of the churches within the limits of the same." "Thus the polity became a theocracy ; God himself was to govern his people ; and the ' saints by calling,' . . . were, by the fundamental law of the colony, constituted the oracle of the divine will. . . . Other States have confined political rights to the opulent, to free-holders, to the first-born ; the Calvinists of Massachusetts, refusing any share of civil power to the clergy, established the reign of the visible church, a commonwealth of the chosen people in covenant with God." Bancroft.^ This was the Calvinistic system precisely. The preachers were not to hold office in itself, but they were to be the rulers of all who did. For, as no man could be a citizen unless he was a member of the church ; and as none could become members of the churches or even " propounded to the congregation, except they be first allowed by the elders f this was to make the preachers supreme. This is exactly the position they occupied. They were consulted in everything, and everything must be subject to their dictation. 42 Id., p. 103. * 3 Adams's "Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 32. 44 " History of the United States," chap. " Self-Government in Massachu- setts," par. 25. NEW ENGLAND PURITAN PRINCIPLES. G03 Other companies of immigrants continued to come, and the colony rapidly grew. In 1634 there were nearly four thousand in the colony. In 1631 Roger Williams landed in Boston, and as the death of Higginson had left a vacancy in the church at Salem, the church called Williams to fill his place ; but as Winthrop and his "assistants" objected, Williams went to Plymouth Colony. The leading minister in Massachusetts Colony at this time was John Cotton. He distinctly taught the blessedness of persecution in itself, and in its benefit to the State, in the following words : "But the good brought to princes and subjects by the due punish- ment of apostate seducers and idolaters and blasphemers, is manifold. " First, it putteth away evill from among the people, and cutteth off a gangreene, which would spread to further ungodlinesse. . = . " Secondly, it driveth away wolves from worrying and scattering the sheep of Christ. For false teachers be wolves, . . and the very name of wolves holdeth forth what benefit will redound to the sheep, by either killing them or driving them away. " Thirdly, such executions upon such evil doers causeth all the country to heare and feare and doe no more such wickednesse. . . Yea, as these punishments are preventions of like wickednesse in some, so are they wholesome medicines, to heale such as are curable of these eviles. . . . "Fourthly, the punishments executed upon false prophets and seduc- ing teachers, doe bring downe showers of God's blessings upon the civill state. . . . " Fifthly, it is an honour to God's justice that such judgments are executed." 45 . . . And Samuel Shepard, a minister of Charlestown, preached an election sermon entitled "Eye Salve," in which he set forth the following views : "Men's lusts are sweet to them, and they would not be disturbed or disquieted in their sin. Hence there be so many such as cry up tollera- tion boundless and libertinism so as (if it were in their power) to order a 45 "The Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 35,36. 604 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. total and perpetual confinement o.f the sword of the civil magistrate unto its scabbard (a motion that is evidently distructive to this people, and to the publick liberty, peace, and prosperity of any instituted churches under heaven). "Let the magistrate's coercive power in matters of religion, there- fore, be still asserted, seeing he is one who is bound to God more than any other man to cherish his true religion ; . . . and how wofull would the state of things soon be among us, if men might have liberty without controll to profess, or preach, or print, or publish what they list, % tending to the seduction of others." 46 In accordance with these principles, every inhabitant of the colony was obliged to attend the services of the Estab- lished Church on Sunday under penalty of fine or imprison- ment. The fine was not to exceed five shillings, equal to about five dollars of the present day, for every absence. About 1633 Roger Williams was called a second time to the ministry of the Salem church. This time he was al- lowed to take the place ; but it was not long before he was again in trouble with the theocrats. He denounced their laws making church membership a qualification for office, and all their laws enforcing religious observances. He declared that the worst law in the English code was that by which they themselves when in England had been compelled to attend the parish church ; and he reproved their inconsistency in counting that persecution in England, and then doing the same things themselves in New England. They maintained, as argued by Cotton, that "persecution is not wrong in itself. It is wicked for falsehood to perse- cute truth, but it is the sacred duty of truth to persecute falsehood." And, as stated by Winthrop, that "we have come to New England in order to make a society after our own model ; all who agree with us may come and join that society ; those who disagree may go elsewhere ; there is room enough on the American continent."* 7 Roger Williams told them that to compel men to unite with those of a different faith is an open violation of natural Id., pp. 36, 37. 17 " Beginnings of New England," p. 178. ROGER WILLIAMS AGAINST PURITANISM. 605 right ; and that to drag to public worship the irreligious and the unwilling, is only to require hypocrisy. "Persons may with less sin be forced to marry whom they cannot love, than to worship where they cannot believe." 48 Accordingly he insisted that "no one should be bound to worship or to maintain a worship against his own consent." At this the theocrats inquired with pious amaze, "What, is not the laborer worthy of his hire 2 " To which Roger replied in words which they could not fail fully to under- stand, " Yes, from them that hire him" The view that the magistrates must be chosen exclusively from membership in the churches, he exploded with the argument that with equal propriety they should select a doctor of physic or the pilot of a ship, because of his stand- ing in the church. Against the statements of Cotton and Shepard and the claims of the theocrats altogether, as to the right of the magis- trate to forestall corrupting influences upon the minds of the people, and to punish error and heresy, he set the evi- dent and everlasting truth that "magistrates are but the agents of the people or its trustees, on whom no spiritual power in matters of worship can ever be conferred, since conscience belongs to the individual, and is not the property of the body politic ; . . . the civil magistrate may not inter- meddle even to stop a church from apostasy and heresy ; this power extends only to the bodies and goods and out- ward estate of men." 49 The theocrats raised the alarm that these principles sub- verted all good government. To which he replied : "There goes many a ship to sea, with many hundred souls in one ship, whose weal and woe is common, and is a true picture of a commonwealth or a human combination or society. It hath fallen out sometimes that both Papists and Protestants, Jews and Turks, may be embarked in one ship ; upon which 48 Backus's "Church History of New England," pp. 62, 63. 49 Bancroft's "History of the United States," chap. "The Providence Plantations," par. 3-6. 606 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. supposal I affirm that all the liberty of conscience that ever I pleaded for turns upon these two hinges, that none of the Papists, Protestants, Jews, or Turks be forced to come to the ship's prayers or worship, nor compelled from their particular prayers or worship, if they practice any." 50 "The removal of the yoke of soul-oppression, as it will prove an act of mercy and righteousness to the enslaved nations, so it is of binding force to engage the whole and every interest and conscience to preserve the common liberty and peace." 51 He also denied the right of the compulsory imposition of an oath. The magistrates had decided to require an oath of allegiance to Massachusetts, instead of to the king of En- gland. Williams would not take the oath, and his influence was so great that so many others refused also that the gov- ernment w r as compelled to drop the project. This caused them to raise a charge against him as the ally of a civil faction. The church at Salem stood by him, and in the face of the enmity of the theocrats elected him their teacher. This was no sooner done than the preachers met together and declared that any one who should obstinately assert that "the civil magistrate might not intermeddle even to stop a church from apostasy and heresy," was worthy of banishment. A committee of their order was appointed to go to Salem and deal with Williams and the church " in a church way." Meantime the people of Salem were punished for choos- ing him for their teacher, by the withholding of a tract of land to which they had laid claim. Williams was ready to meet the committee at every point in expressing and defin- ing his doctrines, and in refuting all their claims. After the committee had returned, the church by Williams wrote let- ters to all the churches of which any of the magistrates were members, ' ' that they should admonish the magistrates of 60 Blakely's "American State Papers," page 68, note. 81 Bancroft's "History of the United States," chap. "The Providence Plantations," par. 6. BANISHMENT OF ROGER WILLIAMS. 607 their injustice." By the next general court the whole of Salem was disfranchised until they should apologize for these letters. The town and the church yielded. Roger Williams stood alone. He was able and willing to do it, and at once declared his " own voluntary withdrawing from all these churches which were resolved to continue in perse- cuting the witnesses of the Lord," and "hoped the Lord Jesus was sounding forth in him the blast which should in his own holy season cast down the strength and confidence of those inventions of men." In October, 1635, he was summoned before the chief representatives of the State. He went and ' ' maintained the rocky strength " of his posi- tion, and declared himself "ready to be bound and ban- ished, and even to die in New England," rather than to re- nounce his convictions. By the earnest persuasions of Cotton, the general court of 1635, by a small majority, sentenced him to exile, and at the same time .attempted to justify the sentence by the flimsy plea that it was not a resjtrainment on freedom of con- science, but because the application of the new doctrine to their institutions seemed "to subvert the fundamental state and government of the country." In January, 1636, a war- rant was sent to him to come to Boston and take ship for England. He refused to go. Officers were sent in a boat to bring him, but he was gone. " Three days before, he had left Salem, in winter snow and inclefnent weather, of which he remembered the severity even in his late old age. ' For fourteen weeks he was sorely tost in a bitter season, not knowing what bread or bed did mean.' Often in the stormy night he had neither fire, nor food, nor company ; often he wandered without a guide, and had no house but a hollow tree. But he was not without friends. The respect for the rights of others which had led him to defend the freedom of conscience, had made him the champion of the In- dians. He had learned their language during his residence at Plymouth ; he had often been the guest of the neighbor- 608 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. ing sachems ; and now, when he carne in winter to the cabin of the chief of Pokanoket, he was welcomed by Massassoit ; and ' the barbarous heart of Canonicus, the chief of the Nar- ragansetts, loved him as his son to the last gasp.' 'The ravens,' he relates, 'fed me in the wilderness.' " 52 The act of 1631 making membership in the church a test of citizenship had involved the theocrats in another dilemma. There was a considerable number of people who were not members of the churches, and because of unfitness could not be admitted. Even more than this, they did not want to be admitted. But as membership in the church was neces- sary to citizenship, and as they wanted to be, and deemed it their right to be, citizens, they took to organizing churches of their own. But the theocrats were not willing that power should slip through their fingers in any such way as this ; they found not only a way to escape from the dilemma, but with that to make their power more absolute. In 1635 the following law was enacted : "Forasmuch as it hath bene fsund by sad experience, that much trouble and disturbance hath happened both to the Church & civill State by the officers & members of some churches, wch have bene gathered . . . in an vudue manner, ... it is ... ordered that . . . this court doeth not, nor will hereafter approue of any such companyes of men as shall henceforth ioyne in any pretended way of church fellowshipp, without they shall first acquainte the magistrates, & the elders of the greatr pte of the churches in this jurisdicon, with their intencons, and have their approbacon herein. And ffurther, it is ordered, that noe pson, being a member of any churche which shall hereafter be gathered without the approbacon of the magistrates, & the greater pte of the said churches shall be admitted to theffreedome of this comonwealthe." 53 In May, 1636, Henry Yane was elected governor. Some time before this Anne Hutchinson, with her family, had come over from Lincolnshire, being followed later by her brother-in-law, John Wheelwright. She was an excellent woman, and made many friends, and at her house held re- 52 Jd., par. 7-11. 63 "Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 29. JOHN WHEELWRIGHT AND HIS PREACHING. 609 ligious meetings for women. The object of these meetings was to talk over the sermons for mutual edification ; but as was natural, they drifted into the discussion of the ministers rather than their sermons. In one of these meetings Mrs. Hutchinson happened to remark that of the ministers " none did preach the covenant of free grace but Master Cotton," and that they " had not the seal of the Spirit, and so were not able ministers of the New Testament." This remark soon got into circulation among the preachers, and of course was not at all palatable. As Cotton was named as the one exemplary minister, in October the ministers went in a body to his house to call him to account. Cotton proposed that the other ministers and Mrs. Hutchinson should have a friendly interview at his house, in order to come to an understanding. She, suspect- ing a trap, was rather wary at first, and declined to commit herself to any definite statement upon the point at issue, but being urged by the "Kev." Hugh Peters to deal fairly and honestly with them, she allowed herself at last to be per- suaded to say that the report was in substance true, and that she did in truth see a wide difference between Cotton's preaching and theirs; "that they could not preach a cove- nant of grace so clearly as he, because they had not the seal of the Spirit." Instead of the preachers' being reconciled to Mrs Hutch- inson's view, or to Cotton, their enmity was deepened. The matter spread more and more, and the colony was di- vided into two parties ; and at the head of the Hutchinson party was Yane, the governor. In January 1637, on a fast-day, .John Wheelwright preached in Boston to the effect that "it maketh no matter how seemingly holy men be according to the law, if ... they are such as trust to their own righteousness they shall die, saith the Lord. Do ye not after their works ; for they say and do not. They make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments ; and love the upper- 610 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. most rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues ; and greetings in the market place, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. But believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and ye shall be saved, for being justified by faith we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. And the way we must take if so be we will not have the Lord- Jesus Christ taken from us is this : we must all prepare a spiritual combat, we must put on the whole armor of. God, and must have our loins girt up and be ready to fight ; . . . because of fear, in the night, if we will not fight, the Lord Jesus Christ may come to be surprised.'' 54 This brought matters to a crisis. In March the legislature met, and a court was appointed, composed of Henry Vane, twelve magistrates, twelve preachers, and thirty-three depu- ties. Wheelwright was arraigned before the court. His sermon was brought forth, and an attempt was made to have him admit that when he spoke in the sermon of those under a covenant of works, he meant his brother ministers in the colony. Of course it was easy for him to throw the matter on them. He demanded that they controvert his doctrine. He said he was ready to prove by the Scriptures that the doctrine was true. As to who was meant in the sermon, he told them that "if he were shown any that walked in such a way as he had described to be a covenant of works, them did he mean." The rest of the ministers were asked by the court if they "did walk in such a way." "They all acknowledged that they did," except Cotton, who declared that "Brother Wheelwright's doctrine was accord- ing to God in the parts controverted, and wholly and alto- gether." By hard work the opposition succeeded in having Wheel- wright convicted of sedition ; but they were not able to secure sentence at once, and had him remanded to the next session. As soon as the decision was known, more than sixty of the leading citizens of Boston signed a petition to 64 " Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 55. WHEELWRIGHT 18 BANISHED. 611 the court in behalf of Wheelwright, in which they referred to the persecution as a restriction of the right of free speech, and among other things said : "Paul was counted a pestilent fellow, or a mover of sedition, and a ringleader of a sect, . . . and Christ himselfe, as well as Paul, was charged to bee a teacher of new doctrine. . . . Now wee beseech you, consider whether that old serpent work not after his old method, even in our daies. . . . Thirdly, if you look at the effects of his doctrine upon the hearers, it hath not stirred up sedition in us, not so much as by accident ; wee have not drawn the sword, as sometimes Peter did, rashly, neither hare wee rescued our innocent brother, as sometimes the Israelites did Jonathan ; and yet they did not seditiously. The covenant of free grace held forth by our brother hath taught us rather to become humble suppliants to your worships, and if wee should not prevaile, wee would rather with patience give our cheekes to the smiters." 55 It is not necessary to follow particulars farther ; the question was made the issue at the next election. Wheel- wright's enemies carried the day, electing Winthrop gov- ernor. At the next session held in November, he was summoned to appear, and was ordered to submit, or pre- pare for sentence. He maintained that as he had preached only the truth of Christ, he was guilty of neither sedition nor contempt. The court replied that they had not cen- sured his doctrine, but had left that as it was ; but the cen- sure was upon the application by which " he laid the magis- trates and ministers and most of the people in this church under a covenant of works." He was sentenced to be dis- franchised and banished, and he was given fourteen days to leave Massachusetts. Like Roger Williams, he was com- pelled to go forth alone in the bitterness of the New England winter. Wheelwright was no sooner out of the way than they pro- ceeded to try his friends who had presented the petition, and these men who had not only in the petition disclaimed any thought of sedition, but had said that if their petition was not heard, they "would rather with patience give their 65 /d., p. 57. 612 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. cheekes to the smiters," were held to be public enemies. "Such scruples, however, never hampered the theocracy. Their justice was trammeled neither by judges, by juries, nor by laws." Adams. 56 This accomplished, they next proceeded to execute ven- geance on Anne Hutchinson, the chief traitor, and the cause of all their dissension. In November, 1637, "she was brought to trial before that ghastliest den of human iniquity, an ecclesiastical criminal court. The ministers were her ac- cusers, who came burning with hate to testify to the words she had spoken to them at their own request, in the belief that the confidence she reposed was to be held sacred. She had no jury to whose manhood she could appeal, and John Winthrop, to his lasting shame, was to prosecute her from the judgment seat. She was soon to become a mother, and her health was feeble ; but she was made to stand till she was exhausted ; and yet abandoned and forlorn, before those merciless judges, through two long, weary days of hunger and of cold, the intrepid woman defended her cause with a skill and courage which even now, after two hundred and fifty years, kindles the heart with admiration. "The case for the government was opened by John Win- throp, the presiding justice, the attorney-general, the fore- man of the jury, and the chief magistrate of Massachusetts Bay. lie upbraided the prisoner with her many evil courses, with having spoken things prejudicial to the honor of the ministers, with holding an assembly in her house, and with divulging the opinions held by those who had been censured by that court." Adams. 5 ' 1 The proceedings then continued after the following order : Governor Winthrop. ' ' We have thought good to send for you, . . . that if you be in an erroneous way, we may reduce you that so you may become a profitable member here among us ; otherwise if you be obstinate, . . . that then the court may take such course that you may trouble 56 Id., p. 65. bl ld., pp. 65, 66. THE PURITAN INQUISITION. 613 us no further. Therefore I would entreat you . . . whether you do not justify Mr. Wheelwright's sermon and the petition ? " Mrs. Ilutchinson. "I am called here to answer before you, but I hear no things laid to my charge." Gov. "I have told you some already, and more I can tell you." Mrs. II. " Name one, sir." Gov. "Have I not named some already? " Mrs. II. " What have I said or done ? " . . . Gov. " You have joined with them in faction." Mrs. II. " In what faction have I joined them ? " Gov. "In presenting the petition." . . . Mrs. H. " But I had not my hand to the petition." Gov. " You have counseled them." Mrs. II. "Wherein ? " Gov. "Why, in entertaining them." Mrs. If. " What breach of law is that, sir? " Gov. ' ' Why, dishonoring of parents. " . , . Mrs. II. "I may put honor upon them as the children of God, and as they do honor the Lord." Gov. "We do not mean to discourse with those of your sex, but only this : you do adhere unto them, and do endeavor to set forward this faction, and so you do dis- honor us" Mrs. II. "I do acknowledge no such thing, neither do I think that I ever put any dishonor upon you." Dep.-Gov. "I would go a little higher with Mrs. Hutch- inson. Now .... if she in particular hath disparaged all our ministers in the land that they have preached a covenant of works, and only Mr. Cotton a covenant of grace, why this is not to be suffered. '' . . . Mrs. II. "I pray, sir, prove it, that I said they preached nothing but a covenant of works." . . . Dep.-Gov. "If they do not preach a covenant of grace, clearly, then, they preach a covenant of works," 47 614 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Mrs, H. "No, sir; one may preach a covenant of grace more clearly than another, so I said." Rev. Hugh Peters. "That which concerns us to speak unto, as yet we are sparing in, unless the court command us to speak, then we shall answer to Mrs. Hutchinson, notwith- standing our brethren are very unwilling to answer. Myself and others had heard that the prisoner said we taught a cove- nant of works ; we sent for her, and though she was ' very tender ' at first, yet upon being begged to speak plainly, she explained that there ' M-as a broad difference ' between our Brother Mr. Cotton and ourselves. I desired to know the difference. She answered ' that he preaches the cove- nant of grace and you the covenant of works,' and that you are not able ministers of the New Testament, and know no more than the apostles did before the resurrection." Mrs. II. "If our pastor would show his writings, you should see what I said, and that things are not so as is re- ported." Mr. Wilson. " Sister Hutchinson, for the writings you speak of, I have them not." . . . Peters was followed by five other preachers, who first with hypocritical meekness expressed themselves as loth to speak in this assembly concerning that gentlewoman, yet to ease their consciences in the relatio'n wherein they stood to the commonwealth and unto God, they felt constrained to state that the prisoner had said they were not able minis- ters of the New Testament, and that the whole of what Hugh Peters had testified was true. The court then adjourned till the next day. When the court opened the next day, Mrs. Hutchin- son began her defense by calling as her witnesses Messrs. Leverett, Coggeshall, and Cotton. And the inquisitorial mill again began to grind. Gov. Wintlirop. "Mr. Coggeshall was not present." Coggeshall. ' ' Yes, but I was ; only I desired to be silent till I should be called." .PURITAN COVENANT OF GRACE. 615 Gov. "Will you . . . say that she did not say so ? " Mr. C. " Yes, I dare say that she did not say all that which they lay against her." Mr. Peters. " How dare you look into the court to say such a word? " Mr. C. "Mr. Peters takes upon him to forbid me. I shall be silent." . . . Gov. "Well, Mr. Leverett, what were the words? I pray speak." Mr. Leverett. "To my best remembrance, . . . Mr. Peters did with much vehemency and entreaty urge her to tell what difference there was between Mr. Cotton and them, and upon his urging of her she said : ' The fear of man is a snare, but they that trust upon the Lord shall be safe.' And . . . that they did not preach a covenant of grace so clearly as Mr. Cotton did, and she gave this reason of it, because that as the apostles were for a time with- out the Spirit, so until they had received the witness of the Spirit they could not preach a covenant of grace so clearly." Cotton was next called, and took his place as witness. Mr. Cotton. "I must say that I did not find her saying they were under a covenant of works, nor that she said they did preach a covenant of works." Gov. "You say you do not remember ; but can you say she did not speak so ? " Mr. C. "I do remember that she looked at them as the apostles before the ascension." . . . Dep.-Gov. "They affirm that Mrs. Hutchinson did say they were not able ministers of the New Testament." Mr. C. "I do not remember it." 58 Mrs. Hutchinson believed also in the abiding presence of the Holy Spirit, and in the promise of Christ that the Spirit will guide the Christian, especially in the understand- ing of the Scriptures. She therefore taught that "the Holy 58 " Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 66-70. 616 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Ghost dwells in a justified person," and that it is the duty of Christians to "follow the bidding of the Holy Spirit." For this she was regarded by the formalistic Puritans as little less than a raving fanatic, and her teachings as tending to anarchy. And as "there was nothing which the ortho- dox Puritan so steadfastly abhorred as the anarchical pre- tense of living by the aid of a supernatural light," she was denounced as "weakening the hands and hearts of the people toward the ministers," and as being "like Roger Williams, or worse." 59 Now at her trial, knowing that although the court was worsted in its case as to the main point, and that she had no hope of escape without an attack upon this phase of her belief, she chose rather to introduce the matter herself than to allow the court to force her upon ground of their own choosing. She therefore stated that she knew by the Spirit of God that her teachings were the truth, and closed a short speech as follows : Mrs. II. "Now if you condemn me for speaking what in my conscience I know to be truth, I must commit myself unto the Lord." Mr. Nowell. "How do you know that that was the Spirit?" Mrs. II. " How did Abraham know that it was God ? " Dep.-Gov. "By an immediate voice." Mrs. II. " So to me by an immediate revelation." She next stated to the court her conviction that the Lord had showed to her that she would be delivered out of the hands of the court, and referred to some passages in the book of Daniel. In the condition in which the poor woman was, it is not to be wondered at that under the continued and cruel goading of the court, she should speak the follow- ing words : Mrs. II. " You have power over my body, but the Lord Jesus hath power over my body and soul ; and assure 59 Beginnings of New England," p. 49 ; and Bancroft's " History of the United States," chap. " The Colonization of New Hampshire," par. 8. MRS. HUTCHINSON IS CONDEMNED. 61 T yourselves thus much, you do as much as in you lies to put the Lord Jesus Christ from you, and if you go ' on in this course you begin, you will bring a curse upon you and your posterity, and the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.' 1 Gov. "Daniel was delivered by miracle. Do you think to be delivered so too ? " Mrs. If. " I do here speak it before the court. I look that the Lord should deliver me by his providence." . . . Dep.-Gov. "I desire Mr. Cotton to tell us whether you do approve of Mrs. Hutchinson's revelations as she hath laid them down." Mr. C. "I know not whether I understand her; but this I say, If she doth expect a deliverance in a way of providence, then I cannot deny it." Gov. . . . "I see a marvelous providence of God to bring things to this pass. . . . God by a providence hath answered our desires, and made her to lay open herself and the ground of all these disturbances to be by revela- tions." .'. . Court. "We all consent with you." Gov. "Ey, it is the most desperate enthusiasm in the world." . . . Mr. Endicott. "I speak in reference to Mr. Cotton. . . . Whether do you witness for her or against her ? " Mr. C. "This is that I said, sir, and my answer is plain, that if she doth look for deliverance from the hand of God by his providence, and the revelation be ... accord- ing to a word [of Scripture], that I cannot deny." Mr. Endicott. " You give me satisfaction." Dep.-Gov. "No, no ; he gives me none at all." Mr. C. "I pray, sir, give me leave to express myself. In that sense that she speaks I dare not bear witness against it." Mr. Nowell. "I think it is a devilish delusion." Gov. " Of all the revelations that ever I read of, I never read the like ground laid as is for this. The enthu- siasts and Anabaptists had never the like." . . . 618 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Mr. Peters. "I can say the same ; . . . and I think that is very disputable which our Brother Cotton hath spoken." . . . Gov. "I am persuaded that the revelation she brings forth is delusion. " All the court (except two or three ministers). " We all believe it, we all believe it." . . . Coddington. "I beseech you do not speak so to force things along, for I do not for my own part see any equity in the court in all your proceedings. Here is no law of God that she hath broken, nor any law of the country that she hath broke, and therefore deserves no censure ; and if she say that the elders preach as the apostles did, why they preached a covenant of grace, and what wrong is that to them? . . . Therefore I pray consider what you do, for here is no law of God or man broken." Mr. Peters. "I confess I thought Mr. Cotton would never have took her part." Gov. " The court hath already declared themselves sat- isfied . . . concerning the troublesomeness of her spirit and the danger of her course amongst us, which is not to be suf- fered. Therefore if it be the mind of the court that Mrs. Hutchinsou . . . shall be banished out of our liberties, and imprisoned till she be sent away, let them hold up their hands." All but three consented. Gov. "Those contrary minded hold up yours." Messrs. Coddington and Colburn only. Gov. "Mrs. Hutchinson, the sentence of the court you hear is that you are banished from out of our jurisdiction as being a woman not fit for our society, and are to be im- prisoned till the court shall send you away." Mrs. Hutchinson. "I desire to know wherefore I am banished." Gov. " Say no more : the court knows wherefore, and is satisfied." 60 00 " Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 72-75. THE INQUISITION CONTINUES. 619 Here the proceedings in the court ended. She was com- mitted to Joseph Welde of Roxbury, whose brother, one of the preachers, had pronounced her a Jezebel. There the preachers continued their tormenting questioning and cross- questioning, until the poor woman was driven so near to distraction that they with "sad hearts" could frame a charge against her of being possessed with Satan. They therefore wrote to the church at Boston offering to make proof of the same, upon which she was summoned to appear to answer before the church. When she came, one of the ruling elders read a list of twenty-nine "errors," of all of which they accused her. She admitted that she had maintained all of them, and then asked a pointed question herself. Mrs. II. " By what rule did such an elder come to me pretending to desire light, and indeed to entrappe me?" The elder. "I came not to entrappe you, but in com- passion to your soul." The inquisition continued from eight o'clock in the morning until eight o'clock at night, when sentence of admonition was pronounced. The case was then adjourned for a week, when she was caused once more to appear upon her trial, and was charged, amongst other things, with having denied " inherent righteousness." Of course she was con- victed upon all the charges, ' ' so that the church with one consent cast her out. . . . After she was excommunicated, her spirit, which seemed before to be somewhat dejected, revived again, and she gloried in her sufferings." " And all this time she had been alone ; her friends were far away. That no circumstance of horror might be lost, she and one of her most devoted followers, Mary Dyer, were nearing their confinements during this time of misery. Both cases ended in misfortunes over whose sickening details Thomas Welde and his reverend brethren gloated with a savage joy, declaring that ' God himselfe was pleased to step in with his casting vote ... as clearly as if he had pointed 620 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. with his finger.' Let posterity draw a veil over the shock- ing scene. " Adains, 61 Happily she escaped with her life. A few days after her condemnation, the governor sent her a warrant banishing her from the territory of Massachusetts. At the solicitation of Roger Williams, she and her friends went to Narragan- sett Bay. Miantonomoh made them a present of the island of Rhode Island, where they settled. In 1636 about a hundred people, under the leadership of Thomas Hooker, a minister second only to Cotton in the estimate of the colonists, removed from Massachusetts Col- ony to the valley of the Connecticut, and established there the towns of Springfield, "Windsor, Hartford, and Wethers- field ; and January 14, 1639, Springfield preferring to re- main in the jurisdiction of Massachusetts, the three remaining towns established a form of government under eleven "fun- damental orders," the preamble of which is as follows : "Forasmuch as it hath pleased the Almighty God by the wise dispo- sition of his divine providence so to order and dispose of things that we, the inhabitants and residents of "Windsor, Hartford, and Wethersfield are now cohabiting and dwelling in and upon the river of Connecticut and the lands thereunto adjoining ; and well knowing where a people are gathered together, the word of God requires that to maintain the peace and union of such a people there should be an orderly and decent government established according to God, to order and dispose of the affairs of the people at all seasons as occasion shall require ; do there- fore associate and conjoin ourselves to be as one public state or com- monwealth ; and do for ourselves and our successors and such as shall be adjoined to us at any time hereafter, enter into combination and con- federation together, to maintain and pursue the liberty and purity of the gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess, as also the disci- pline of the churches which according to the truth of the said gospel is now practiced amongst us ; as also in our civil affairs to be guided and governed according to such laws, rules, orders, and decrees as shall be made, ordered, and decreed." 62 Order number four was to the effect that the governor should "be always a member of some approved congrega- 61 Id. 6a Charters and Constitutions, Connecticut. PLANTING OF CONNECTICUT AND NEW HAVEN. 621 tion, and formerly of the magistracy within this jurisdiction." The oath of office for the governor was as follows : "I, , being now chosen to be governor within this jurisdic- tion, for the year ensuing, and until a new be chosen, do swear by the great and dreadful name of the overliving God, to promote the public good and peace of the same, according to the best of my skill ; as also will maintain all lawful privileges of this commonwealth ; as also that all wholesome laws that are or shall be made by lawful authority here established, be duly executed ; and will further the execution of justice according to the rule of God's word ; so help me God in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ." 63 The oath of the magistrate was substantially the same. Unlike Massachusetts, church membership was not required in order to be a voter. Persons became citizens by vote of the major part of the town where they lived, or the major part of such as should be then present and taking the l ' oath of fidelity." In 1637 a colony of Puritan immigrants with John Davenport as their pastor, arrived in Boston, and remained until the spring of 1638, then founded the town and colony of New Haven. In 1639 a colony from New Haven settled the town of Milford, and another company from England settled the town of Guilford. In the same year a form of government was established, and "by the influence of Davenport it was resolved that the Scriptures are the perfect rule of the common wealth ; that the purity and peace of the ordinances to themselves and their posterity were the great end of civil order ; and that church members only should be free burgesses." Bancroft.^ A committee of twelve was appointed to nominate seven men to become magistrates. In August the seven met together to put into working order the forms of the new government. " Abrogating every pre- vious executive trust, they admitted to the court all church 63 id. 64 " History of the United States," end of chap. "The Colonization of Connecticut." 622 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. members ; the character of- civil magistrates was next ex- pounded ' from the sacred oracles ; ' and the election fol- lowed. Then Davenport, in the words of Moses to Israel in the wilderness, gave a charge to the governor to judge righteously ; 'The cause that is too hard for you,' such was part of the minister's text, ' bring it to me, and I will hear it.' Annual elections were ordered ; and God's word estab- lished as the only rule in public affairs." The other towns followed 'this example, and thus "the power of the clergy reached its extreme point in New Haven, for each of the towns was governed by seven ecclesiastical officers known as 'pillars of the church.' These magistrates served as judges, and trial by jury was dispensed with, because no authority could be found for it in the laws of Moses." In 1643 the four colonies of Massachusetts, Plymouth, Connecticut, and new Haven formed a league called the United Colonies of New England, the purpose of which was defined as follows : " Whereas wee all came into these parts of America with one and the same end and ayme ; namely, to advaunce the kingdome of our Lord Jesus Christ and to enjoy the liberties of the gospell in puritie with peace ; And, whereas, in our settleinge (by a wise Providence of God) wee are further dispersed vpon the sea coasts and riuers than was at first intended, so that wee cannot according to our desire with conven- ience communicate in one gouernment and jurisdiccon, . . . wee there- fore doe couceiue it our bounden dutye without delay to enter into a present consotiation amongst our selucs for mutuall help and strength in all our future concernements : That as in nation and religion so in other respects wee bee and continue one according to the tenor and true meaneing of the ensuing articles : Wherefore it is fully agreed and con- cluded by and between the parties of jurisdiccons aboue named, and they jointly and seuerally doe by these presents agree and conclude that they all bee and henceforth bee called by the name of The United Colonies of New England. " 1. The said United Colonies for themselves and their posterities do joyntly and seuerally hereby enter into a firme and perpetuall league of 65 " Beginnings of New England," p. 136. THE THEOCRACY IS COMPLETED. friendship and amytie for offence and defence, mutnall advise, and suc- cour vpon all just occasions both for preserueing and propagateing the truth and liberties of the gospell and for their owne mutuall safety and wellfare. . . . "6. It is also agreed that for the managing and concluding of all af- faires proper and concerning the whole Confederacon two commissioners shall be chosen by and out of eich of these foure jurisdiccons ; namely, two for the Massachusetts, two for Plymouth, two for Connectacutt, and two for New Haven, being all in. church fellowship with us which shall bring full power from their seueral generall courts respectively to heare examine, weigh, and determine all affaires," etc. 6G The population of the four colonies was about twenty-' four thousand, Massachusetts having about fifteen thousand, and the other three colonies about three thousand each. The Federal Commissioners formed an advisory board rather than a legislative body. The formation of this league strengthened the theocracy. By the strictness of the rules which had been framed by the preachers to regulate the admission of members to the churches, there were so few that joined the churches, that the membership, which was supposed to include at least the great majority of the people, in fact embraced not more than one third of them. And now as a demand began to be made for freedom of worship according to other than Congrega- tional forms, the Congregational clergy saw that something must be done more firmly to confirm their power. Accordingly at Cambridge, August, 1648, after two years' reflection, there was framed a "Platform of Church Disci- pline Gathered out of the Word of God." It was in fact the establishment of the Congregational Church upon the basis of the confederacy of the four colonies ; for throughout, although it professed to maintain the principles of the independence of each congregation, it provided " councils composed of elders, and other messengers of churches to advise, to admonish, and to withhold fellowship from a church," but not to ex- ercise special acts of discipline, or jurisdiction, in any par- 66 "National Reform Manual," 1890, pp. 223, 224. 624 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. ticular church. And further it provided that if any church should separate itself from the communion of the churches, the magistrates might compel them to conform. "The Westminster Confession was promulgated as the creed ; the powers of the clergy were minutely defined, and the duty of the laity stated to be ' obeying their elders and submitting themselves unto them in the Lord.' The magistrate was en- joined to punish 'idolatry, blasphemy, heresy,' and to coerce any church becoming ' schismatical.' ' Adams." In October, 1649, the platform was referred to the gen- eral court for consideration and adopted, and was further submitted by them to the churches for their approval. In October, 1651, it was confirmed by each of the legislatures. Thus was the theocracy of Massachusetts completed and clothed with all the power of the commonwealth. And as its power was increased, so were its bitter fruits vastly in- creased. In 1649 Governor Winthrop died, and was suc- ceeded by John Endicott ; and in 1652 John Cotton died, and was succeeded by John lS r orton, and these two men, John Endicott and John Norton, have been not inaptly described as "two as arrant fanatics as ever drew breath." And with the accession of these two men to the headship of the com- plete and fully furnished theocracy, the New England reign of terror may be said to have begun. THE SUFFERINGS OF THE BAPTISTS. Of all the pests which so far the New England Puritans dreaded and hated, the Baptists or, as they were nicknamed, "the Anabaptists," were the greatest. It was not one of the least of the offenses of Roger Williams that he was a Baptist. Not long after Roger Williams's banishment, that Thomas Shepard of Charlestown in the sermon before referred to entitled "Eye Salve," had told the governor and the magis- trates that ' ' Anabaptists have ever been looked at by the godly leaders of this people as a scab ; " and the president 67 "Emancipation of Massachussets," p. 98. LAWS AGAINST TUB BAPTISTS. 625 of Harvard College said that ' ' such a rough thing as a New England Anabaptist is not to be handled over tenderly." According to these principles, therefore, the general court of Massachusetts in 1644 " Ordered and agreed that if any person or persons, within this juris- diction, shall either openly condemn or oppose the baptizing of infants, or go about secretly to seduce others from the approbation or use thereof, or shall purposely depart the congregation at the ministration of the ordinance, or shall deny the ordinance of magistracy, or their lawful right and authority to make war, or to punish the outward breaches of the first table, and shall appear to the court willfully and obstinately to continue therein, after due time and means of conviction, every such person or persons shall be sentenced to banishment." 68 The next year, however, a strong petition was presented for the repeal of the law because of the offense that had been "taken thereat by the godly in England, 'but many of the elders entreated that the law might continue still in force." The law remained, but the representative of the colony who went to England in 1646 explained to Parlia- 68 Id., p. 105. Under the year 1649, Hildreth gives the copy of a law em- bodying the provisions cited above, with other important points. It seems to be the same law, but if it really belongs under 1649, it must be a re-enactment with additions. It runs thus: "' Although no human power be lord over the faith and consciences of men, yet because such as bring in damnable heresies, tending to the subversion of the Christian faith and destruction of the souls of men, ought duly to be restrained from such notorious impieties,' therefore ' any Chris- tian within this jurisdiction who shall go about to subvert or destroy the Chris- tian faith or religion by broaching and maintaining any damnable heresies, as denying the immortality of the soul, or resurrection of the body, or any sin to be repented of in the regenerate, or any evil done by the outward man to be ac- counted sin, or denying that Christ gave himself a ransom for our sins, or shall affirm that we are not justified by his death and righteousness, but by the per- fection of our own works, or shall deny the morality of the fourth commandment, or shall openly condemn or oppose the baptizing of infants, or shall purposely depart the congregation at the administration of that ordinance, or shall deny the ordinance of magistracy, or their lawful authority to make war, or to punish the outward breaches of the first table, or shall endeavor to seduce others to any of the eiTors and heresies above mentioned ; ' any such were liable to banish- ment." " History of the United States," Vol. i, chap, xii, par. 1, 2. 626 PROTESTANTISM TRUE ^AND FALSE. nient that "'tis true we have a severe law, but wee never did or will execute the rigor of it upon any. . . . But the reason wherefore wee are loath either to repeale or alter the law is because wee would have it ... to beare witnesse against their judgment, . . . which we conceive ... to bee erroneous." In pursuance of this law and in the same year, a Baptist by the name of Painter, for refusing to let his child be sprinkled, "was brought before the court, where he declared their baptism to be antichristian." He was sentenced to be whipped, which he bore without flinching. And now in 1651 three Baptist ministers, John Clarke, Obadiah Holmes, arid John Crandall, went from the Provi- dence plantation to Lynn, Massachusetts, to visit an aged Baptist. They arrived on Saturday, July 19, and the next day they worshiped together in his private house. While Mr. Clarke was preaching, two constables entered the house with a warrant to arrest "certain erroneous persons being strangers." The three ministers were carried off at once to the tavern, and were notified that they must attend worship at the parish church in the afternoon. They protested, say- ing that if they were forced into the meeting-house, they should be obliged to dissent from the service. The con- stable told them that was nothing to him. He was ordered to bring them to church, and to church they must go. As they entered the meeting-house, the congregation was at prayers, and the three prisoners took off their hats ; but as soon as the prayer was over, they put on their hats again, and began reading in their seats. The officers were ordered to take off their hats again. When the service \vas over, Elder Clarke asked permis- sion to speak. His request was granted on condition that he would not speak about what he had just heard preached. He began to explain why he had put on his hat, saying that he " could not judge that they were gathered according to the visible order of the Lord." He was allowed to proceed THE BAPTIST PRINCIPLES. 627 no further, and the three were shut up for the night. The following Tuesday they were taken to Boston and put in prison. July 31, they were tried before the court of assist- ants, and were fined, Clarke twenty pounds, Holmes thirty, and John Crandall five, " or each to be well whipped." At the beginning of the trial Elder Clarke had asked that they be shown the law under which they were being tried, and now he made the same request again, but Endicott broke in, "You have deserved death. I will not have sucli trash brought into our jurisdiction. You go up and down, and secretly insinuate things into those that are weak, but you cannot maintain it before our ministers ; you may try a dis- pute with them." As they were sent away from the court to prison, Elder Holmes says, "As I went from the bar, I exprest myself in these words : ' I blesse God I am counted worthy to suffer for the name of Jesus ; ' whereupon John Wilson (their pastor, as they call him) strook me before the judge- ment-seat, and cursed me, saying, ' The curse of God . . . goe with thee ; ' so we were carried to the prison." The Baptists were ready to defend their doctrines as well as to attack the popish ceremonies of the Puritans ; therefore Elder Clarke, as soon as they had arrived at the prison, wrote a letter to the court, and proposed to debate the Baptist principles with any of their ministers. He was asked in reply what the Baptist principles were that he would debate. Clarke drew up four propositions, the first stating their faith in Christ ; second, that baptism, or dip- ping in water, is one of the commandments of the Lord Jesus Christ, and that a visible believer or disciple of Christ Jesus (that is, one who manifests repentance toward and faith in Jesus Christ) is the only person to be baptized or dipped in water, etc. ; third, that every such believer in Christ may in point of liberty, and ought in point of duty, to improve that talent which the Lord had given him, and in the congregation may ask for information to himself ; or if 628 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. he can, may speak by way of prophecy, for edification, and upon all occasions and in all places as far as the jurisdiction of his Lord extends, may and ought to walk as a child of light ; and, fourth, "I testify that no such believer or serv- ant of Christ Jesus hath any liberty, much less authority, from his Lord, to smite his fellow-servant, nor with outward force, or arm of flesh to constrain, or restrain, his con- science, nor his outward man for conscience' sake, or worship of his God, where injury is not offered to any person, name, or estate of others, every man being such as shall appear before the judgment-seat of Christ, and must give an account of himself to God ; and, therefore, ought to be fully persuaded in his own mind for what he undertakes, because he that doubteth is damned if he eat, and so also if he act, because he doth not eat or act in faith, and what is not of faith is sin." There was at first some talk, or rather a bluff, that Cotton would debate with him ; but after consulting to- gether, Cotton declined, and as Elder Clarke's fine had been paid by his friends, he was released, and ordered to go out of the colony as soon as possible. They all three refused to pay the fine that was imposed. Crandall was admitted to bail, but they resolved to hold Elder Holmes, and make him an example. What happened to him he himself tells in a letter to his brethren in London, as follows : "I desired to speak a few words : but Mr. Nowel answered, 'It is not now a time to speak/ whereupon I took leave, and said, 'Men, brethren, fathers, and countrymen, I beseech you to give me leave to speak a few words, and the rather because here are many spectators to see me punished, and I am to seal with my blood, if God give strength, that which I hold and practice in reference to the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. That which I have to say, in brief, is this : although I am no disputant, yet seeing I am to seal with my blood what I hold, I am ready to defend by the word, and to dispute that point with any that shall come forth to withstand it.' Mr. Nowel answered, now was no time to dispute ; then said I, ' I desire to give an account of the faith and order which I hold,' and this I desired three times ; but in comes THE WHIPPING OF ELDER HOLMES. 629 Mr. Flint, and saith to the executioner, 'Fellow, do thine office, for this fellow would but make a long speech to delude the people,' so I, being resolved to speak, told the people, ' That which I am to suffer for is the word of God, and testimony of Jesus Christ.' 'No,' saith Mr. Nowel, ' it is for your error, and going about to seduce the people ; ' to which I replied, 'Not for error, for in all the time of my imprisonment, wherein I was left alone, my brethren being gone, which of all your ministers came to convince me of error ? And, when upon the governor's words, a motion was made for a public dispute, and often renewed upon fair terms, and desired by hundreds, what was the reason it was not granted?' Mr. Nowel told me, it was his fault who went away and would not dispute ; but this the writings will clear at large. Still Mr. Flint calls to the man to do his office ; so before, and in the time of his pull- ing off my clothes, I continued speaking, telling them that I had so learned that for all Boston I would not give my body into their hands thus to be bruised upon another account, yet upon this I would not give an hundredth part of a wampum peague to free it out of their hands ; and that I made as much conscience of unbuttoning one button, as I did of paying the thirty pounds in reference thereunto. I told them, moreover, that the Lord having manifested his love towards me in giving me repentance towards God, and faith in Christ, and so to be baptized in water by a messenger of Jesus, in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, wherein I have fellowship with him in his death, burial, and resurrection, I am now come to be baptized in afflictions by your hands, that so I may have further fellowship with my Lord, and am not ashamed of his sufferings, for by his stripes am I healed. And as the man began to lay the strokes upon my back, I said to the people, 'Though my flesh should fail, and my spirit should fail, yet God would not fail ; ' so it pleased the Lord to come in, and to fill my heart and tongue as a vessel full, and with an audible voice I break forth, praying the Lord not to lay this sin to their charge, and telling the people that now I found he did not fail me, and therefore now I should trust him forever who failed me not ; for in truth, as the strokes fell upon me, I had such a spiritual manifestation of God's presence, as I never had before, and the outward pain was so removed from me, that I could well bear it, yea, and in a manner felt it not, although it was grievous, as the spectators said, the man striking with all his strength, spitting in his hand three times, with a three-corded whip, giving me therewith thirty strokes. When he had loosed me from the post, having joyfulness in my heart, and cheerfulness in my countenance, as the spectators ob- served, I told the magistrates, 'You have struck me with roses;' and said, moreover, 'Although the Lord hath made it easy to me, yet I pray God it may not be laid to your charge."' 48 630 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. When the whipping was over, two men, John Hazel and John Spur, went up to the suffering man, and shook hands with him, Hazel not speaking anything at all, and Spur simply saying, " Blessed be the Lord ; " yet both were fined forty shillings, with the choice of paying the fine or being whipped. They both refused to pay the fine, but a friend paid Spur's, and after imprisonment for a week, another paid Hazel's. The whipping of Holmes was thirty lashes with a three-thonged whip of knotted cord wielded with both hands, and was so severe that when taken back to prison, his lacerated body could not bear to touch the bed. For many days he was compelled to rest propped up on his hands and knees. In prison an old acquaintance came "with much tenderness like the good Samaritan," to comfort him and dress his wounds, and even against him informa- tion was given, and inquiry made as to who was the surgeon. When Elder Holmes's letter reached his friends in London, they published it, upon which Sir Richard Saltonstall wrote to the Boston preachers the following letter : "Reverend and dear friends, whom I unfeignedly love and respect : It doth, not a little grieve my spirit to hear what sad things are re- ported daily of your tyranny and persecution in New England ; that you fine, whip, and imprison men for their consciences. First, you compel such to come into your assemblies as you know will not join with you in worship, and when they show their dislike thereof, or witness against it, then you stir up your magistrates to punish them for such (as you conceive) their public affronts. Truly, friends, this practice of com- pelling any in matters of worship to do that whereof they are not fully persuaded, is to make them sin, for so the apostle tells us (Rom. xiv, 23) ; and many are made hypocrites thereby, conforming in their outward man for fear of punishment. We pray for you and wish your prosperity every way ; hoped the Lord would have given you so much light and love there, that you might have been eyes to God's people here, and not to practice those courses in a' wilderness, which you went so far to pre- vent. These rigid ways have laid you very low in the hearts of the saints. I do assure you I have heard them pray in public assemblies, that the Lord would give you meek and humble spirits, not to strive so much for uniformity as to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. When I was in Holland, about the beginning of our wars, I THE PERSECUTORS JUSTIFY THEMSELVES. 631 remember some Christians there, that then had serious thoughts of planting in New England, desired me to write to the governor thereof, to know if those that differ from you in opinion, yet holding the same foundation in religion, as Anabaptists, Seekers. Antinomians, and the like, might be permitted to live among you ; to which I received this short answer from your then governor, Mr. Dudley: 'God forbid,' said he, ' our love for the truth should be grown so cold that we should tolerate errors.' It is important to know what answer was made to this, and to know the arguments that were used by the New En- gland theocracy to justify these wicked persecutions. The preachers answered Sir liichard's letter, by the hand of their chief, John Cotton. And the letter runs as follows : "Honored and dear Sir : My Brother Wilson and self do both of us acknowledge your love, as otherwise formerly, so now in late lines we received from you, that you grieve in spirit to hear daily complaints against us ; it springeth from your compassion for our afflictions therein, wherein we see just cause to desire you may never suffer like injury in yourself, but may find others to compassionate and condole with you. For when the complaints you hear of are against our tyranny and perse- cution in fining, whipping, and imprisoning men for their consciences, be pleased to understand we look at such complaints as altogether injuri- ous in respect of ourselves, who had no hand or tongue at all to promote either the coming of the persons you aim at into our assemblies, or their punishment for their carriage there. Righteous judgments will not take up reports, much less reproaches against the innocent. The cry of the sins of Sodom was great amMoud, and reached unto heaven ; yet the righteous God (giving us an example what to do in the like case) he would first go down to see whether their crimes were altogether ac- cording to the cry, before he would proceed to judgment. Gen. xviii, 20, 21. And when he did find the truth of the cry, he did not wrap up all alike promiscuously in the judgment, but spared such as he found innocent. We are amongst those (if you knew us better) you would ac- count of as (as the matron of Abel spake of herself) peaceable in Israel. 2 Sam. xx, 19. Yet neither are we so vast in our indulgence or tolera- tion as to think the men you speak of suffered an unjust censure. For one of them, Obadiah Holmes, being an excommunicate person himself, out of a church in Plymouth patent, came into this jurisdiction, and took upon him to baptize, which I think himself will not say he was compelled here to perform. And he was not ignorant that the rebaptiz- 632 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. ing of an elder person, and that by a private person out of office and under excommunication, are all of them manifest contestations against the order and government of oiw churches, established, we know, by God's law, and he knoweth by the laws of the country. And we con- ceive we may safely appeal to the ingenuity of your own judgment, whether it would be tolerated in any civil state, for a stranger to come and practise contrary to the known principles of the church estate ? As for his whipping, it was more voluntarily chosen by him than inflicted on him. His censure by the court was to have paid, as I know, thirty pounds, or else to be whipt : his fine was offered to be paid by friends for him freely ; but he chose rather to be whipt ; in which case, if his sufferings of stripes was any worship of God at all, surely it could be accounted no better than will worship. The other, Mr. Clarke, was wiser in that point, and his offense was less, so was his fine less, and himself, as I hear, was contented to have it paid for him, whereupon he was released. The imprisonment of either of them was no detriment. 1 believe they fared neither of them better at home ; and I am sure Holmes had not been so well clad for years before. " But be pleased to consider this point a little further : You think to compel men in matter of worship is to make them sin, according to Rom. xiv, 23. If the worship be lawful in itself, the magistrate com- pelling to come to it, compelleth him not to sin, but the sin is in his will that needs to be compelled to a Christian duty. Josiah compelled all Israel, or, which is all one, made to serve the Lord their God. 2 Chron. xxxiv, 33. Yet his act herein was not blamed, but recorded among his virtuous actions. For a governor to suffer any within his gates to profane the Sabbath, is a sin against the fourth commandment, both in the private householder and in the magistrate ; and if he requires them to present themselves before the Lord, the magistrate sinneth not, nor doth the subject sin so great a sin as if he did refrain to come. But you say it doth but make men hypocrites, to compel men to conform the outward man for fear of punishment. If it did so, yet better be hypo- crites than profane persons. Hypocrites give God part of his due, the outward man ; but the profane person giveth God neither outward nor inward man. Nevertheless, I tell you the truth, we have tolerated in our church some Anabaptists, some Antinomians, and some Seekers, and do so still at this day. 69 " In 1655 Thomas Gould of Charlestown refused to have his baby sprinkled and christened. The regular preacher ordered the church "to lay him under admonition, which the church was backward to do. 1 ' Not long afterward he 69 Backus's "Church History of New England," pp. 75-81. THOMAS GOULD AND HIS BRETHREN. C33 was at church as the law required him to be, and when the time of sprinkling the children came, he went out. He was spoken to about it, but told them he could not stay because he "lookt upon it as no ordinance of Christ. They told me that now I had made known my judgment, I might stay. . . . So I stayed, and sat down in my seat, when they were at prayer and administering the service to infants. Then they dealt with me for my unreverent carriage." Their dealing with him was to admonish him and exclude him from the communion. In October, 1656, he was accused before the county court for denying baptism to his child. Of course he was con- victed. He was admonished and given till the next term to consider his ways. During this time they made it so un- pleasant for him that he ceased attending the church at Charlestown, and went to church at Cambridge instead. But this, being an apparent slight upon the minister, was only a new offense. Although not actually punished, he was sub- jected to petty annoyances, being again and again summoned both to the church and to the court to be admonished, until in May 28, 1665, he withdrew entirely from the Congrega- tional Church, and with eight others formed a Baptist church. This being " schismatical," was counted as open rebellion, and Gould and his brethren were summoned to appear be- fore the church the next Sunday. They told the magistrates that they could not go at that time, but the following Sunday they would be there ; but the minister refused to wait, and in his sermon "laid out the sins of these men, and delivered them up to Satan." They were called before one court after another, until their case reached the general court in October. Those among them who were freeman were disfranchised, and if they should be convicted again of continued schism, were to be imprisoned until further order. In April, 1666, they were fined four pounds, and were imprisoned until September, when they were ordered to be discharged upon payment of PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. fines and costs. In April, 1068, they were ordered by the governor and council to appear at the meeting-house at nine o'clock on the morning of April 1-i, to meet six ministers who would debate with them. The debate, however, did not amount to much except that it gave to the ministers an op- portunity to denounce the Baptists as they wished. The Baptists, asking for liberty to speak, were told that they stood there as delinquents, and ought not to have liberty to speak. Two days were spent in this way, when at the end of the second day, "Rev." Jonathan Mitchell pronounced the following sentence from Deut. xvii, 9-12 : - " And thou shall come unto the priests and the Levites, and unto the judge that shall be in those days, and inquire ; and they shall show thee the sentence of judgment : And thou shalt do according to the sen- tence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose, shall show thee ; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee. According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee, and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do ; thou shalt not decline from the sentence which they shall show thee, to the right hand nor to the left. And the man that will do pre- sumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minis- ter there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die ; and thou shalt put away evil from Israel." May 27, Gould and two of his brethern as " obstinate and turbulent Anabaptists," were banished under penalty of perpetual imprisonment. They remained. Accordingly they were imprisoned. By this persecution much sympathy was awakened in the community, and a petition in their behalf was signed by sixty-six of the inhabitants of Charles- town, among whom were some of the most prominent citi- zens. The petition was to the legislature, and prayed for mercy upon the prisoners, saying, " They be aged and weakly men ; . . . the sense of this their . . . most deplorable and afflicted condition hath sadly affected the hearts of many . . . Christians, and such as neither approve of their judgment or practice ; especially considering that the men are reputed godly, and of a blameless conversation. . . . We therefore most humbly beseech this honored court, in their Christian ANOTHER REMONSTRANCE FROM ENGLAND. 635 mercy and bowels of compassion, to pity and relieve these poor prisoners." 70 The petition was by vote declared scan- dalous and reproachful. The two persons who had taken the lead in getting it up, were fined, one ten and the other five pounds, and all the others who had signed the petition were compelled to sign a document expressing their sorrow for giving the court such just grounds of offense. Report of these proceedings having reached England, thirteen of the Congregational ministers wrote, by the hand of Robert Mascall, a letter to their brethren in New England, in which they said : "O, how it grieves and affects us, that New England should perse- cute ! Will you not give what you take ? Is liberty of conscience your due ? And is it not as due unto others who are sound in the faith ? Amongst many Scriptures, that in the fourteenth of Romans much con- firms me in liberty of conscience thus stated. To him that esteemeth any- thing unclean, to him it is unclean. Therefore though we approve of the baptism of the immediate children of church members, and of their admission into the church when they evidence a real work of grace, yet to those who in conscience believe the said baptism to be unclean, it is unclean. Both that and mere ruling elders, though we approve of them, yet our grounds are mere interpretations of, and not any express script- ure. I cannot say so clearly of anything else in our religion, neither as to faith or practice. Now must we force our interpretations upon others, pope-like ? How do you cast a reproach upon us who are Congregational in England, and furnish our adversaries with weapons against us ! We blush and are filled with shame and confusion of face, when we hear of these things. Dear brother, we pray that God would open your eyes, and persuade the heart of your magistrates, that they may no more smite their fellow-servants, nor thus greatly injure us their brethren, and that they may not thus dishonor the name of God. My dear brother, pardon me, for I am affected ; I speak for God, to whose grace I commend you all in New England ; and humbly craving your prayers for us here, and remain your affectionate brother, ROBERT MASCALL. . " Finsbury, near Morefield, March 25, 1669." 71 It seems that the imprisoned Baptists were by some means released after about a year's confinement, but the 70 "Emancipation of Massachussets," pp. 118-125. 71 Backus's " Church History of New England," pp. 99-101. 636 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. next year afterward Gould and Turner were arrested and imprisoned "a long time." The cases which we have cited are not by any means all the persecutions and oppressions that fell upon the Baptists ; but these are sufficient to show that the persecution was shameful enough, even had these been all the cases that ever occurred. The persecution continued even beyond the date which we have now reached, but the Baptists were assisted in their splendid fight for freedom of thought and of worship, and relief came the quicker to them, by the no less heroic and more fearfully persecuted Quakers. THE SUFFERINGS OF THE QUAKERS. In July, 1656, Mary Fisher and Anne Austin, two Quaker women, landed in Boston. By some means, news of their coming had preceded them. Before they were allowed to land at all, Richard Bellingham, the deputy-governor, Governor Endicott being absent, sent officers aboard the ship, " searched their trunks and chests, and took away the books they found there, which were about one hundred, and carried them ashore, after having commanded the said women to be kept prisoners aboard ; and the said books were, by an order of the council, burnt in the market-place by the hangman." The women were soon taken from the ship, however, and at once "shut up close prisoners, and command was given that none should come to them without leave ; a fine of five pounds being laid on any that should otherwise come at or speak with them, tho' but at the window. Their pens, ink, and paper were taken from them, and they not suffered to have any candle-light in the night season ; nay, what is more, they were stript naked, under pretense to know whether they were witches, tho' in search- ing no token was found upon them but of innocence. And in this search they were so barbarously misused that modesty forbids to mention it. And that none might have communi- cation with them, a board was nailed up before the window FIRST TREATMENT OF QUAKERS. 637 of the jail." 72 August 18, the following order was issued to the jailer : " To the Keeper of the Boston, Jail : You are by virtue hereof to keep the Quakers formerly committed to your custody as dangerous persons, industrious to improve all their abilities to seduce the people of this jurisdiction, both by words and letters, to the abominable tenets of the Quakers, and to keep them close prisoners, not suffering them to confer with any person, nor permitting them to have paper or ink. "Signed, EDWARD RAWSOX, " Sec. of the Boston Court. "August 18, 16XC." 1 ' They were not only denied food by the authorities, but ' ' liberty was denied even to send them provisions. " ' ' Seeing they were not provided with victuals, Nicholas Upshal, one who lived long in Boston, and was - a member of the church there," bought of the jailer for five shillings a week the privilege of furnishing them with food. September Y, an- other order was issued to the jailer, commanding him "to search as often as he saw meet, the boxes, chests, and things of the Quakers formerly committed to his custody, for pen, ink, and paper, papers and books, and to take them from them." 7 * "After having been about five weeks prisoners, William Chichester, master of a vessel, was bound in one hundred pound bond to carry them back, and not suffer any to speak with them, after they were put on board ; and the jailer kept their beds . . . and their Bible, for his fees." 75 During the imprisonment they were frequently examined by the ministers with a view to getting some hold on them by which they might be dealt with for the heresy of schism, or some other such crime, but all in vain. It was well for the two women that they happened to be sent away when they were, for not long afterward Endicott returned, and was not a little 72 " Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 143, 144. 73 Besse's "Sufferings of the Quakers." 74 /<7. 76 " Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 144. 638 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. displeased with Bellingham, the deputy-governor, for dealing so gently with them, declaring that if lie' had been there, he "would have had them well whipped," although as yet the colony had no law at all concerning Quakers. These two women had not been long gone before eight other Quakers arrived in Boston. They were subjected to the same sort of treatment to which the other two had been. In the same month of September, the Commissioners of the United Colonies met at Plymouth, and the Boston court called upon them to stir up Plymouth Colony to vigilance, especially against the Quakers. The letter ran as follows : " Having heard some time since that our neighboring colony of Ply- mouth, our beloved brethren, in great part seem to be wanting to them- selves in a due acknowledgment and encouragement of the ministry of the gospel, so as many pious ministers have (how justly we know not) deserted their stations, callings, and relations ; our desire is that some such course may be taken, as that a pious orthodox ministry may be re- stated among them, that so the flood of errors and principles of anarchy may be prevented. Here hath arrived amongst us several persons pro- fessing themselves Quakers, fit instruments to propagate the kingdom of Satan , for the securing of our neighbors from such pests, we have im- prisoned them all till they be dispatched away to the place from whence they came." 76 "The commissioners gave advice accordingly," but Brad- ford, who was governor of Plymouth, would not take any such steps. After his death, however, severe measures were adopted. October 14, 1656, the general court of Massachusetts enacted the following law : "Whereas there is an accursed sect of heretics lately risen in the world, which are commonly called Quakers, who take upon them to be immediately sent of God and infallibly assisted by the Spirit, to speak and write blasphemous opinions, despising governments, and the order of God in the church and commonwealth, speaking evil of dignities, re- proaching and reviling magistrates and ministers, seeking to turn the people from the faith, and gain proselytes to their pernicious ways : This court taking into consideration the premises, and to prevent the like mischief as by their means is wrought in our land, doth hereby order, 76 Backus's " Church History of New England," p. 89. FIRST LAW AGAINST QUAKERS. 639 and by the authority of this court be it ordered and enacted that what master or commander of any ship, bark, pink, or catch, shall henceforth bring into any harbor, creek, or cove, within this jurisdiction, any Qua- ker or Quakers, or other blasphemous heretics, shall pay, or cause to be paid, the fine of one hundred pounds to the treasurer of the county, except it appear he want true knowledge or information on their being such, and in that case he hath liberty to clear himself by his oath, when sufficient proof to the contrary is wanting. And for default of good payment, or good security for it, he shall be cast into prison, and there to continue till the said sum be satisfied to a treasurer as aforesaid. And the commander of any catch, ship, or vessel, being legally convicted, shall give in sufficient security to the governor, or- any one or more of the magistrates, who have power to determine the same, to carry them back to the place whence he brought them, and on his refusal to do so, the governor or any one or more of the magistrates, are hereby empowered to issue out his or their warrants to commit such master or commander to prison, there to continue till he give in sufficient security to the con- tent of the governor, or any of the ma; istrates as aforesaid. And it is hereby further ordered and enacted, thai, what Quaker soever shall arrive in this country from foreign parts, or shall come into this jurisdiction from any parts adjacent, shall be forthwith committed to the house of correc- tion, and at their entrance to be severely whipped, and by the master thereof to be kept constantly to work, and none suffered to converse or speak with them during the time of their imprisonment, which shall be no longer than necessity requires. And it is ordered, if any person shall knowingly import into any harbor of this jurisdiction any Quaker's books or writings concerning their devilish opinions, he shall pay for such book or writing, being legally proved against him or them, the sum of five pounds ; and whosoever shall disperse or sell any such book or writ- ing, and it be found with him or her, or in his or her house, and shall not immediately deliver the same to the next magistrate, shall forfeit or pay five pounds for the dispersing or selling of every such book or writ- ing. And it is hereby further enacted that if any person within this colony shall take upon them to defend the heretical opinions of the Quakers, or any of their books or papers as aforesaid, being legally proved, shall be fined for the first time forty shillings ; and if they per- sist in the same, and shall again defend it the second time, four pounds ; if they shall again defend and maintain said accursed heretical opinions, they shall be committed to the house of correction till there be conven- ient passage to send them out of the land, being sentenced to the court of assistants to banishment. Lastly, it is hereby ordered that what person or persons soever shall revile the person of magistrates or ministers as is usual with the Quakers, such person or persons shall be severely whipped, or pay the sum of five pounds." 77 77 Basse's "Sufferings of the Quakers." 640 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. When this law was published, Nicholas Upshal, the kind and Christian old gentleman who had bought the privilege of feeding Mary Fisher and Anne Austin, when they were in prison, ' ' publicly testified against it. " The next morning he was summoned to answer before the general court. He told them that " the execution of that law would be a forerunner of a judgment upon their country, and there- fore in love and tenderness which he bare to the people and the place, desired them to take heed, lest they were found fighters against God." He was fined twenty pounds, although a member of one of the churches. And then having absented himself from church on account of these things, he was fined three pounds, and banished, although winter was now come, and he " a weakly, ancient man." 78 Notwithstanding these laws and penalties, and the spirit to inflict the penalties in the severest way, the Quakers continued to come. In fact, wherever such laws were, that was the very place where the Quakers wished to be, because they were opposed to every kind of soul-oppression and every form of the union of Church and State. Not only in this, but in almost everything else, their views made them objects of special hatred to the theocrats of Massachusetts. They recognized no such distinction among Christians as clergy and laity, and could neither be coaxed nor forced to pay tithes. They refused to do military service, and would not take an oath. They would not take their hats off either in church or in court. ' ' In doctrine their chief peculiarity was the assertion of an 'inward light,' by which every in- dividual is to be guided in his conduct of life." And "the doctrine of the 'inward light,' or of private inspiration, was something especially hateful to the Puritan." FisJ^e. 19 Another thing no less hateful to the Puritan than this, was their refusal to keep Sunday in the Puritan way. They called "in question the propriety of Christians turning the 78 "Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 146. ""Beginnings of New England," p. 180. RHODE ISLAND'S GLORIOUS APPEAL. 641 Lord's da y into a Jewish Sabbath." Fiske. They were denounced as infidels, blasphemers, agents of the devil, and were counted as easily guilty of every heresy and every crime in the Puritan theocratical catalogue. Admission to the confederacy of the New England colo- nies had been absolutely refused Rhode Island, on account of its principles of liberty of conscience ; but hatred of the Quakers led Massachusetts colony in 1657 to ask Rhode Island to join the confederacy in the endeavor to save New England from the Quakers. "They sent a letter to the authorities of that colony, signing themselves their loving friends and neighbors, and beseeching them to preserve the whole body of colonists against 'such a pest,' by banishing and excluding all Quakers, a measure to which ' the rule of charity did oblige them.' ' - Fiske.* 1 But Roger Williams was still president of Rhode Island, and, true to his principles, he replied: "We have no law amongst us whereby to punish any for only declaring by words their minds and understandings concerning things and ways of God as to salvation and our eternal condition. As for these Quakers, we find that where they are most of all suffered to declare themselves freely and only opposed by arguments in discourse, there they least of all desire to come. Any breach of the civil law shall be punished, but the freedom of different consciences shall be respected." 82 This reply enraged the whole confederacy. Massachu- setts threatened to cut off the trade of Rhode Island. In this strait Rhode Island, by Roger Williams, appealed for protection to Cromwell, who now ruled England. The ap- peal presented the case as it was, but that which made it of 80 Id. 81 /^ p- 184< 88 Jd., pp. 184, 185. This was not in any sense an expression of indifference as to the teachings of the Quakers; because by discussion Roger was constantly combating them. He wrote a book against them, entitled, " George Fox Digged out of his Burrowes," and at the age of seven ty-three he " rowed himself in a boat the whole length of Narragansett Bay to engage in a theological tourna- ment against three Quaker champions." Id., p. 186. 642 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. everlasting importance, as the grandest and most touching appeal in all history, is the piteous plea, " But whatever fortune may "befall, let us not be compelled to exercise any civil power over metis consciences." In this year, October 14, another law was passed against Quakers, in which it was enacted that "If any person or persons within this jurisdiction shall henceforth entertain and conceal any such Quaker or Quakers, or other blasphem- ous heretics, knowing them so to be, every such person shall forfeit to the country forty shillings for every such hour's entertainment and con- cealment of any Quaker or Quakers, etc., as aforesaid, and shall be com- mitted to prison as aforesaid, till forfeiture be fully satisfied and paid : and it is further ordered that if any Quaker or Quakers shall presume, after they have once suffered what the law requires, to come into this jurisdiction, every such male Quaker shall for the first offense have one of his ears cut off, and be kept at work in the house of correction till he can be sent away at his own charge, and for the second offense shall have his other ear cut off : and every woman Quaker that has fulfilled the law here that shall presume to come into this jurisdiction, shall be severely whipped, and kept at the house of correction at work, till she be sent away at her own charge, and so also for her coming again she shall be alike used as aforesaid : and for every Quaker, he or she, that shall presume a third time herein again to offend, they shall have their tongues burned through with a red-hot iron, and be kept at the house of correction close to work, till they be sent away at their own charge. And it is further ordered that all and every Quaker arising from among ourselves, shall be dealt with, and suffer the like punishments, as the law provides against foreign Quakers." 84 The Quakers, however, not only continued to come, and to come again when imprisoned, whipped, and banished ; but their preachings, and much more their persecutions, raised up others in the colonies. This result followed so promptly that May 20, 1058, the following statute was enacted : ' ' That Quakers and such accursed heretics, arising among ourselves, may be dealt with according to their deserts, and that their pestilent errors and practices may be speedily prevented, it is hereby ordered, as an addition to the former laws against Quakers, that every such person 83 Id. M Basse's " Sufferings of the Quakers." HORRIBLE LAWS AGAINST THE QUAKERS. 643 or persons, professing any of their pernicious ways by speaking, writing, or by meeting on the Lord's day, or at any other time, to strengthen themselves, or seduce others to their diabolical doctrines, shall, after due means of conviction, incur the penalty ensuing ; that is, every person so meeting, shall pay to the country for every time ten shillings ; and every one speaking in such meeting, shall pay five pounds apiece ; and in case any such person, after having been punished by scourging or whipping for such, according to the. former law, shall be still kept at work in the house of correction, till they put in security with two sufficient men, that they shall not any more vent their hateful errors, nor use their sin- ful practices, or else shall depart this jurisdiction at their own charges, and if any of them return again, then each such person shall incur the penalty of the law formerly made for strangers." 85 In 1058 "Rev." John Norton, supported by the rest of the clergy, circulated a petition praying that the penalty of death should be visited upon all Quakers who should return after having been banished. The Board of Commissioners of the United Colonies met in Boston in September. The petition was presented to the Board, which in response advised the general court of each colony to enact such a law. Accordingly, October 1 6, the general court of Massachusetts enacted the following law : "Whereas there is a pernicious sect, commonly called Quakers, lately risen, who by word and writing have published and maintained many dangerous and horrid tenets, and do take upon them to change and alter the received laudable customs of our nation, in giving civil respect to equals, or reverence to superiors ; whose actions tend to undermine the civil government, and also to destroy the order of the churches, by deny- ing all established forms of worship, and by withdrawing from orderly church fellowship, allowed and approved by all orthodox professors of truth, and instead thereof, and in opposition thereunto, frequently meeting by themselves, insinuating themselves into the minds of the simple, or such as are least affected to the order and government of church and commonwealth, whereby divers particular inhabitants have been infected, notwithstanding all former laws made, upon the experi- ence of their arrogant and bold obtrusions, to disseminate their princi- ples amongst us, prohibiting their coming into this jurisdiction, they have not been deterred from their impious attempts to undermine our peace and hazard our ruin : 85 Id. 644 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. "For prevention thereof, this court doth order and enact that every person or persons, of the cursed sect of the Quakers, who is not an inhabitant of, but is found within, this jurisdiction, shall be apprehended without warrant, where no magistrate is at hand, by any constable, com- missioner, or selectman, and conveyed from constable to constable, to the next magistrate, who shall commit the said person to close prison, there to remain (without bail) unto the next court of assistants, where they shall have a legal trial: and being convicted [Xote : " For which conviction, it was counted sufficient that they appeared with their hats on or said ' thee ' and ' thou.' " ] to be of the sect of the Quakers, shall be sentenced to be banished upon pain of death : and that every inhabitant of this jurisdiction being convicted to be of the aforesaid sect, either by taking up, publishing, or defending the horrid opinions of the Quakers, or the stirring up of mutiny, sedition, or rebellion against the govern- ment, or by taking up their abusive and destructive practices, viz., deny- ing civil respect to equals and superiors, and withdrawing from our church assemblies, and instead thereof frequenting meetings of their own in opposition to our church order, or by adhering to, or approving of, any known Quaker, and the tenets and practices of Quakers, that are opposite to the orthodox received opinions of the godly, and endeavoring to dis- affect others to civil government and church orders, or condemning the practice and proceedings of this court against the Quakers, manifesting thereby their complying with those whose design is to overthrow the order established in Church and State, every such person upon con- viction before the said court of assistants, in manner aforesaid, shall be committed to close prison for one month, and then, unless they choose voluntarily to depart this jurisdiction, shall give bond for their good behavior, and appear at the next court, where, continuing obstinate, and refusing to retract and reform their aforesaid opinions, they shall be sen- tenced to banishment upon pain of death ; and any one magistrate upon information given him of any such person, shall cause him to be appre- hended, and shall commit any such person to prison, according to his discretion, until he come to trial as aforesaid." 86 Kor were any of these laws in any sense a dead letter. They were enforced in the regular Puritan way. In 1657 the following order was issued by Governor Endicott : "To the marshall general or his deputy : You are to take with you the executioner, and repair to the house of correction, and there see him cutoff the right ears of John Copeland, Christopher Holder, and John Rouse, Quakers, in execution of the sentence of the court of assistants for the breach of the law instituted, 'Quakers.' " 87 86 Id. 87 Id. HORRIBLE TORTURES OF QUAKERS. In the latter part of the same year the following order was issued by the court : "Whereas Daniel South-wick and Provided Southwick, son and daughter of Lawrence Southwick, absentin'fj themselves from the public or- dinances, have been fined by the courts of Salem and Ipswich, pretending they have no assistance, 'and resolving not to work, the court, upon perusal of a law, which was made upon account of debts, in answer to what should be done for the satisfaction of the fines, resolves that the treasurers of the several counties are and shall be fully empowered to sell the said persons to any of the English nation, at Virginia or Barba- does, to answer the said fines. 88 With this latter sentence there is connected an important series of events. As stated in this order, these two persons were son and daughter of Lawrence Southwick. Lawrence Southwick and his wife Cassandra, were an aged couple who had been members of the Salem church until about the close of 1656. They had three children, Joseph, who was a man grown, and the two mentioned above, who were but mere youth. The old gentleman and his wife were arrested at the beginning of the year 1657, upon a charge of harboring Quakers. The old gentleman was released, but as a Quaker tract was found upon his wife, she was imprisoned seven weeks, and fined forty shillings. If they were not Quakers before, this made them such, and likewise some of their friends. A number of them now withdrew from the Salem church, and worshiped by themselves. All were arrested. Lawrence and Cassandra Southwick and their son Joseph, were taken to Boston to be dealt with. Upon their arrival there, Febru- ary 3, without even the form of a trial they were whipped and imprisoned eleven days, the weather being extremely cold. In addition to this, they were fined four pounds and thirteen shillings, for six weeks' absence from church on Sun- day, and their cattle were seized and sold to pay this fine. The following summer two Quakers, William Leddra and William Brend, went to Salem. They, with five others, 49 88 Id. 646 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. among whom were the Southwicks who before had suffered, were arrested for meeting together. They were all taken to Boston, and put all together in a room in the prison, of which the windows were boarded up close. Food was denied them, unless they would work* to par for it. u To work when wrongfully confined, was against the Quaker's conscience." Adams."' They therefore went five days without any- thing to eat. This, however, was only a part of their suf- ferings, for on the second day of their imprisonment, they all were severely whipped, and then with raw wounds were thrown back into the close dark room, in the July heat, with nothing to lie upon but the bare boards. On the second day afterwards they were informed that they could go if they would pay the constables and jail fees. They refused to pay anything. The next day the jailer, in order to force them to yield, took Brend, and with irons bound his neck and heels together, and kept him that way' for sixteen hours, from five o'clock in the morning till nine o'clock at night. The next day Brend was put to the mill and ordered to work. He could not have worked if he would, as he could scarcely move ; but he would not have worked if he could, and so he refused. Then in a rage *' the gaoler took a pitched rope, about an inch thick, and gave him twenty blows over his back and arms with all his strength, till the rope untwisted ; then he fetched another rope, thicker and stronger, and told Brend that he would cause him to bow to the law of the country, and make him work. Brend thought this in the highest degree unreasonable, since he had com- mitted no evil, and was wholly unable to work, having been kept five days without eating, and whipped also, and now thus unmercifully beaten. Yet in the morning the gaoler relented not, but began to beat again with his' pitched rope on the poor man's bruised body, and foaming at the mouth like a madman, with violence laid four score and seventeen more blows upon him, as other prisoners, who beheld this 89 "Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 164. THE PEOPLE EFFECT A RESCUE. 647 cruelty with grief and passion reported. And if his strength and his rope had not failed him, he would have laid on more. He thought also to give him the next morn- ing as many blows more. ... To what condition these blows must have brought the body of Brend, who had noth- ing on but a serge cossack over-shirt, may easily be con- ceived. His back and arms were bruised and bleeding, and the blood hanging, as it were, in bags under his arms, and so into one was his flesh beaten that the sign of a particular blow could not be seen. His body being thus cruelly tort- ured, he lay down upon the boards so extremely weakened that the natural parts decaying, and his strength failing, his body turned cold ; there seemed, as it were, a struggle between life and death ; his senses were stopped, and he had for some time neither seeing, feeling, nor hearing ; till at length a divine power prevailing, life broke through death, and the breath of the Lord was breathed in his nostrils.'- 90 The people now, horrified at the outrage, would bear no more. Aery was raised, they "rushed to the jail, and rescued the tortured prisoner. This rather frightened the govern- ment. Endicott sent his own family doctor to succor Brend, but the surgeon pronounced the case hopeless that the flesh would " rot from off his bones," and he must die. The cry of the people grew louder, arid their indignation more fierce. They demanded that the barbarous jailer should be brought to justice. The magistrate posted up on the church door a promise that he should be brought to trial, but here the "Rev." John Norton stepped forth, declaring: "Brend endeavored to beat our gospel ordinances black and blue ; if he then be beaten black and blue, it is but just upon him, and I will appear in his behalf that did so." He rebuked the magistrates for their faintness of heart, and commanded them to take down the notice from the church door. They obeyed, and the cruel jailer was not only justified, but was commanded to whip the Quakers who were yet in prison 90 Besse's "Sufferings of the Quakers." 64:8 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. " twice a week if they refused to work, and the first time to add five stripes to the former ten, and each time to add three to them." 91 The other prisoners now presented a petition to the court praying to be released. Their petition was dated, "From the House of Bondage in Boston, wherein we are made cap- tives by the wills of men, although made free by the Son (John viii, 36), in which we quietly rest, this sixteenth of the fifth month, 1658." They were brought into court for examination. They made so strong a defense that there appeared some prospect of their acquittal ; but the preachers rallied in force. The "Rev." Charles Chauncy, in "the Thursday lecture," preached as follows : " Suppose you should catch six wolves in a trap [there were six Salem Quakers], . . . and ye cannot prove that they killed either sheep or lambs ; and now ye have them, they will neither bark nor bite ; yet they have the plain marks of wolves. Now I leave it to your consideration whether ye will let them go alive ; yea or nay ? " 9 * By their diligence the preachers not only prevented any acquittal, but succeeded in forcing through the law of Octo- ber 16, 1658, above quoted (pages 6-4o-4-), inflicting capital punishment upon all who remained, or returned after sen- tence of banishment. The very day on which this law was passed, the prisoners were brought into court, and sentence of banishment was pronounced, the Southwicks being com- manded to leave before the spring elections. They did not go. In May, 1659, they were called up again, and charged with rebellion for not going as commanded. They pleaded that they had no place to go to, and that they had done noth- ing to deserve either banishment or death, though all they had in the world had been taken from them. "Major-General Dennison replied that 'they stood against the authority of the country, in not submitting to their laws : that he should not go about to speak much concerning the error of their 91 "Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 166. OT fd., p. 169. CHILDREN OFFERED AS SLAVES. ('49 judgments: but,' added he, 'You and \ve are not able well to live together, and at present the power is in our hand, and therefore the stronger must send off.'' Accordingly the sentence of banishment was again pro- nounced under the penalty of death. "The aged couple were sent to Shelter Island, but their misery was well-nigh done ; they perished within a few days of each other, tort- ured to death by flogging and starvation." Adams. 9 * Their. son Joseph was sent away in a ship to England. Then the two children, Daniel and Provided, were brought before the court. They were asked why they had not come to church. Daniel replied, "If you had not so persecuted our father and mother, perhaps we might have come." They were fined. As parents and home and all were gone, it was impossible for them to pay any fine ; and as there was not much prospect of the government's making any- thing out of an attempt to force children to work, even by flogging, the sentence quoted on page 645 was pronounced, commanding the county treasurers to sell them to recover the fine. The treasurer of Salern took the children to Boston, and went to a ship's captain who was about to sail for Barbadoes, and began to bargain for their passage to that place to be sold. The captain said he was afraid they would corrupt his ship's company. TJte treasurer. " Oh no, you need not fear that, for they are poor, harmless creatures, and will not hurt anybody." Tlie captain. "Will they not so? And will ye offer to make slaves of so harmless creatures ? " 95 Fortunately, no others could be found so inhuman as the Puritans, and they were compelled to let the children go. In September, 1659, three Quakers, William Robinson, Marmaduke Stevenson, and Mary Dyer, who had but lately come to Boston, were banished. Mrs. Dyer was wife of the secretary of Rhode Island. She returned home. Robinson 93 Id., p. 170. 94 /d. 95 /(7., p. 173. 650 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. and Stevenson went as far as Salem, where they turned about and went back to Boston. Not long afterward, Mrs. Dyer returned. October 20, they were brought before the gen- eral court. Being called to the bar, Governor Endicott commanded the officer to pull off the men's hats. He then said : "We have made several laws to keep the Quakers from amongst us, and neither whipping, nor imprisonment, nor cutting off ears, nor ban- ishment upon pain of death, can keep them from us. Neither I nor any of us desire the death of any of them. Give ear and hearken to your sentence of death." 96 He then sentenced them one by one to be hanged. October 27 was the day set for the execution. For fear the people might effect a rescue, a guard was put upon the prison. As the day drew near, the dissatisfaction of the people became more marked, and when the time came, it was deemed necessary to have a company of two hundred armed men, to make sure that the theocrats might accom- plish the hanging. The three prisoners marched hand in hand to the scaffold on Boston Common, with drums beating before them to drown any words that they might speak. As the procession moved along, "Rev." John Wilson, the Boston preacher, with others of the clergy, stood ready to join in the march. Wilson tauntingly cried out, "Shall such jacks as you come in before authority, with your hats on?" Robinson replied, "Mind you, mind you, it is for not putting off the hat we are put to death." When, they reached the gallows, Eobinson attempted to speak to the people, but Wilson interrupted him with, "Hold your tongue, be silent ; thou art going to die with a lie in thy mouth." The two men were then bound and hanged. The rope was placed round Mrs. Dyer's neck, but her son just then arrived from Rhode Island, and upon his earnest en- treaty and promise to take her away, they let her go. The bodies of the two men were tumbled into a hole in the ^Besse's "Sufferings of the Quakers." THE DEATH PENALTY IS DEFEATED. 651 ground, and left exposed with no sort of burial. The next spring, however, Mrs. Dyer returned again. June 1, she was again marched to the gallows. At the last moment she was told that see might go if she would promise to stay away. She answered, "In obedience to the will of the Lord, I came, and in his will I abide faithful unto death." And so they hanged her. 97 In November, William Leddra, who had been banished, returned to Boston. He was at once arrested, but public opinion was now so strong against the persecution that the government made every effort to persuade him to go away. But he would not go. He was kept in prison four months, and at last, in March, he was sentenced to be hanged. A few days before his execution, he was called before the court, and as he was being questioned, Wenlock Christison, another Qu-aker who had that moment returned from banishment, walked into the court room, and, standing before the judges with uplifted hand, said : "I am come here to warn you that ye shed no more innocent blood." He was arrested and taken at once to jail. Leddra was hanged, but Christison remained ; and as he had openly rebuked the judges, his case was the more notori- ous. But as the discontented murmurings of the people grew louder and louder, the government hesitated to proceed. The theocrats, however, were not yet ready to yield, and so they brought him to trial before the general court, both the governor and the deputy-governor being present. Endicott. "Unless you renounce your religion, you shall die." Christison. "Nay; I shall not change my religion, nor seek to save my life ; neither do I intend to deny my Master ; but if I lose my life for Christ's sake, and the preaching of the gospel, I shall save my life. " 97 " Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 175, 176; "Beginnings of New England," pp. 188, 189. . 652 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Endicott. " Wlftt liave you to say for yourself, why you should not die ? " Christison. " By what law will you put me to death? " Endicott. "We have a law, and by our law you are to die." Christison. "So said the Jews of Christ, 'We have a law, and by our law he ought to die ! ' Who empowered you to make that law ? " One of the Board. "We have a patent, and are the patentees ; judge whether we have not power to make laws." Christison. ."How, have you power to make laws re- pugnant to the laws of England ? " Endicott.- "No." Christison. "Then you are gone beyond your bounds, and have forfeited your patent ; and that is more than you can answer. Are you subjects to the king? yea or nay? " One of the Court. "Yea, we are so." Christison. "Well, so am I. Therefore seeing that you and I are subjects to the king, I demand to be tried by the laws of my own nation." One of the Court. "You shall be tried by a bench and a jury." Christison. " That is not the law, but the manner of it ; for I never heard nor read of any law that was in England, to hang Quakers." Endicott. "There is a law to hang Jesuits." Christison. "If you put me to death, it is not because I go under the name of a Jesuit, but of a Quaker. Therefore I appeal to the laws of my own nation." One of the Court. "You are in our hands, you have broken our law, and we will try you." In the very midst of the trial, a letter was brought in and handed to the court. It was from Edward Wharton, yet another Quaker who had returned from banishment. The letter states : "Whereas you have banished me on pain of death, yet I am at home in my own house at Salem, and therefore purpose that you will take off your wicked sentence "A IIUMANER POLICY." 653 from me, that I may go about my occasions out of your jurisdiction." The trial was over ; but what should they do with the Quaker? They were afraid to sentence him, and they could not bear to confess defeat by letting him go. The court de- bated among themselves more than two weeks what to do. "Endicott was exasperated to frenzy, for he felt the ground crumbling beneath him ; he put the fate of Christison to the vote, arid failed to carry a condemnation. The governor seeing this division, said, ' I could find it in my heart to go home ; ' being in such a rage, that he flung -something furi- ously on the table. . . . Then the governor put the court to vote again ; but this was done confusedly, which so incensed the governor that he stood up and said, ' You that will not consent, record it : I thank God I am not afraid to give judgment. . . . Wenlock Christison, hearken to your sen- tence : You must return unto the place from whence you came, and from thence to the place of execution, and there you must be hanged until you are dead, dead, dead.' " 98 The sentence of the court was to put Christison to death ; but they never dared to execute it. "Even the savage Endicott knew well that all the train bands of the colony could not have guarded Christison to the gallows from the dungeon where he lay condemned/' Adams." The sentence of death, as such, they were thus forced to abandon ; but they still hoped to accomplish the same thing by another, and as their chief apologist defined, a " humaner policy." For this purpose the " Vagabond Act " was passed May 22, 1661, by which it was enacted that, "Any person convicted before a county magistrate of being an undomiciled or vagabond Quaker, was to be stripped naked to the middle, tied to the cart's tail, and flogged from town to town, to the border. Domiciled Quakers to be proceeded against under Act of 1658 to" banishment, and then treated as vagabond 98 "Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 18, 151,152 ; " Beginnings of New England," p. 190. ""Emancipation of Massachusetts," p. 177. 654 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Quakers. The death penalty was still preserved, but not enforced. " Adams. 10 The first victim of this new and ' ' humaner " law was Joseph Southwick, who returned from banishment in 1661, and in the " seventh month " was sentenced to its penalty. On the trial, Endicott told him that they had made the new law "to save his life, in mercy to him." He inquired whether it were not as good to take his life now, as to whip him after their manner, twelve or fourteen times on the cart's tail through their towns, and then put him to death afterward? He was sentenced to be flogged through Boston, Roxbury, and Dedham. " The peculiar atrocity of flogging from town to town lay in this : that the victim's wounds became cold between the times of punishment, and in the winter some- times frozen, which made the torture intolerably agonizing." Adams. m In response to their sentence, Joseph Southwick said : " Here is my body ; if you want a further testimony of the truth I profess, take it and tear it in pieces. ... It is freely given up, and as for your sentence, I matter it not." Then " they tied him to a cart, and lashed him for fifteen miles, and while he ' sang to the praise of God,' his tor- mentor swung with all his might a tremendous two-handed whip, whose knotted thongs were made of twisted cat-gut ; thence he was carried fifteen miles from any town into the wilderness." Adams. 102 And there they left him. In the middle of the winter of 1661-62, a Quaker woman, Elizabeth Hooton, was subjected to the same torture, being whipped through Cambridge, Watertown, and Dedham. In 1662 three Quaker women fell under the notice of "Rev." John Rayner ; " and as the magistrate was ignorant of the technicalities of the law, the elder acted as clerk, and drew up for him the following warrant : " To the Constables of Dover, Hampton, Salisbury, Newbury, Rowley, Ips- wich, Wenham, Linn, Boston, Roxbury, Dedham, a'l^d untill these vaga- bond Quakers are carried out of this jurisdiction : 100 Id., p. 142. Wl ld., pp. 148,149. m Id., p. 172. THE PEOPLE RESCUE THE SUFFERERS. 655 "You and every one of you are required, in the king's majesty's name, to take these vagabond Quakers, Anne Coleman, Mary Tomkins, and Alice Ambrose, and make them fast to the cart's tail, and driving the cart through your several towns, to whip them on their backs, not exceeding ten stripes apiece on each of them in each town, and so to convey them from constable to constable, till they come out of this jurisdiction, as you will answer it at your peril : and this shall 'be your warrant. Per me, ' ' RICHARD WALDEN. "At Dover, dated December tJte 22d, 1662." "The Rev. John Rayner pronounced judgement of death by flogging ; for the weather was bitter, the distance to be walked was eighty miles, and the lashes were given with a whip, whose three-twisted, knotted thongs cut to the bone. " ' So, in a very cold day, your deputy, Walden, caused these women to be stripp'd naked from the middle upward, and tyed to a cart, and after awhile cruelly whipp'd them whilst the priest [John Rayner], stood and looked, and laughed at it. ... They went with the executioner to Hamp- ton, and through dirt and snow at Salisbury, half way the leg deep; the constable forced them after the cart's tayl at which he whipp'd them.' "Had the Rev. John Rayner but followed the cart, to see that his three hundred and thirty lashes were all given with the same ferocity which warmed his heart to mirth at Dover, before his journey's end he would certainly have joyed in giving thanks to God over the women's gory corpses, freezing amid the snow. His negligence saved their, lives, for when the ghastly pilgrims passed through Salisbury, the people, to their eternal honor, set the cap- tives free." Adams. 3 There are many other instances of these horrible tort- ures to both men and women ; but these, without any men- tion of the hanging of witches, are enough to explain and to justify the deserved and scathing sentence of the histo- rian of the United States, that "the creation of a national and uncompromising church led the Congregationalists of 103 u Emancipation of Massachusetts," pp. 155-157. 656 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. Massachusetts to the indulgence of the passions which dis- graced their English persecutors, and Laud was justified by the men whom he had wronged.' 1 Bancroft. 1 ^ Yet it must not be supposed that the legislation with respect to the views of the Baptists and the Quakers was exceptional in its nature or even in its severity ; only, as the laws regarding them were more openly disregarded, the pen- alties were inflicted upon them in greater measure than upon any others. There was a law running as follows : " ' Albeit faith is not wrought by the sword, but the word, neverthe- less, seeing that blasphemy of the true God cannot be excused- by an ignorance or infirmity of human nature,' therefore, 'no person in this jurisdiction, whether Christian or pagan, shall witting! y and willingly presume to blaspheme his holy Name, either by willful or obstinate denying the true God, or his creation or government of the world, or shall curse God, or reproach the holy religion of God, as if it were but a public device to keep ignorant men in awe, nor shall utter any other eminent kind of blasphemy of like nature or degree,' under penalty of death." Another law subjected to fine, whipping, banishment, and finally to death, " any who denied the received books of the Old and New Testaments to be the infallible word of God." IliWreth. Another and about the mildest form of punishment is shown by the following law, enacted in 1646 : "It is therefore ordered and decreed, that if any -Christian (so- called) within this jurisdiction shall contemptuously behave himself towards the word preached or the messenger thereof called to dispense the same in any congregation, when he faithfully executes his service and office therein according to the will and word of God, either by in- terrupting him in his preaching, or by charging him falsely with an error which he hath not taught in the open face of the church, or like a son of Korah, cast upon his true doctrine or himself any reproach, to IM u History of the United States," chap. " The Place of Puritanism in History," par. 5. In his last revision, however, this is softened into this : " The uncompromising Congregationalists of Massachusetts indulged the passions of their English persecutors." 105 " History of the United States," Vol. i, chap, xii, par. 1, 2. LAWS OF NEW HAVEN AND CONNECTICUT. 657 the dishonor of the Lord Jesus who hath sent him, and to the dispar- agement of that his holy ordinance, and making God's ways contemptible or ridiculous, that every such person or persons (whatsoever censure the church may pass) shall for the first scandal, be convented and reproved openly by the magistrate, at some lecture, and bound to their good be- havior ; and if a second time they break forth into the like contemptu- ous carriages, they shall either pay five pounds to the public treasure, or stand two hours openly upon a block or stool four foot high, upon a lecture day, with a paper fixed on his breast, written with capital letters, 'A WANTON GOSPELLER ; ' that others may fear and be ashamed of breaking out into the like wickedness." 106 Yet Massachusetts, though the worst, was not by any means the only one, of the colonies that had an established religion, and that per-consequence persecuted. The other Puritan colonies were of the same order. Plymouth and New Haven were second only to Massachusetts, and Con- necticut was not far behind. New Haven had a law against Quakers, ordering that "Every Quaker that comes into this jurisdiction shall be severely whipped, and be kept at work in the house of correction ; and the second time, be branded in one hand, and kept at work as aforesaid ; the third time be branded in the other hand, and the fourth time, to be bored through the tongue with a red-hot iron." That the law was by no means a nullity, is seen by the fact that Humphrey Norton, merely passing through South- bold on his way to one of the Dutch plantations, was appre- hended, without being asked whither he was going, and committed to the marshal 1, conveyed to New Haven, and there cast into prison, chained to a post, and none suffered to visit him in the bitter cold winter. . . . At length, he was had before the court, where was their priest [minis- ter], John Davenport, to whom Humphrey Norton had sent some religious queries ; and the priest having spoken what he pleased in answer to those queries, Humphrey attempted to reply, but was prevented by their tying a great iron key across his mouth, so that he could not speak. After that he was had again to prison, and after ten days more, sentenced 106 Trumbull's "Blue Laws, True and False," p. 83, with note. 658 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. to be severely whipped, and burned in the hand with the letter ' H ' for heresy, and to be sent out of the colony, and not to return upon pain of the utmost penalty they could inflict by law, and to pay ten pounds jto wards the charge of the court and colony. And they ordered this sentence to be executed the same day. Accordingly, the drum was beat, and the people gathered ; ' the poor man was fetched, and stripped to the waist, and set with his back towards the magistrates, and had given, in their view, thirty-six cruel stripes, and then turned, and his face set towards them, his hand made fast in the stocks, where they had set his body before, and burned very deep with a red-hot iron : then he was sent to prison again, and there kept, till a Dutchman, a stranger to him, paid down twenty nobles for his fine and fees.' It was remarkable that as soon as he had suffered this cruel sentence, and was let loose from the stocks, he knelt down, and prayed to the Lord, to the astonishment of his persecutors." 107 The "Blue Laws" of Connecticut are proverbial; yet they were copied almost bodily from the Massachusetts code. For instance, the "Wanton Gospeller" statute of Massachusetts was adopted by Connecticut, word for word, with only the change of the inscription to "An Open and Obstinate Contemner of God's Holy Ordinances." Nor was it alone in New England that Church and State were united. It was so to a greater or less extent in every one of the thirteen original colonies in America, except Rhode Island. In New England the established religion was Con- gregationalism, while in all the colonies south from New York to Georgia, except only Pennsylvania, the Church of England was the favored one. In Pennsylvania there was no union with any particular denomination as such, but no one could hold office or even vote except "such as possess faith in Jesus Christ." And protection from compulsory re- ligious observances was guaranteed to no one, except those "who confess and acknowledge one almighty and eternal 107 Besse's " Sufferings of the Quakers." JOHN WESLEY PROSECUTED. 659 God to bo the Creator, Upholder, and Ruler of the world/' As all were thus required to be religious, and to possess faith in Jesus Christ, it was therefore required "that according to the good example of the primitive Christians, every first day of the week, called the Lord's day, people shall abstain from their common daily labor, that they may the better dispose themselves to worship God according to their understandings." 108 Maryland, while held by the Roman Catholics, was freer than any other colony, except Rhode Island ; yet even there, as in Pennsylvania, it was only toleration that was guaran- teed, and that only to persons " professing to believe in Jesus Christ." But in 1692 the Episcopalians took possession, and although other forms of religion were still tolerated, " Protest- ant Episcopacy was established by law," and so continued until the Revolution. The Church and State system in Georgia, and even its practical working as late as 1T3T, may be seen in the per- secution of John Wesley. The case grew out of Wesley's refusing the sacrament to certain women, and this was made only the opportunity to vent their spite upon him in what- ever else they could trump up. The first step was taken thus : " GEORGIA. SAVANNAH ss. "To all Constables, Tythingmen, and others whom these may con- cern : You and each of you are hereby required to take the body of John Wesley, clerk, and bring him before one of the bailiffs of the said town, to answer the complaint of William Williamson and Sophia his wife, for defaming the said Sophia, and refusing to administer to her the sacrament of the Lord's Supper, in a publick congregation, without cause ; by which the said William Williamson is damag'd one thousand pound sterling. And for so doing, this is your warrant, certifying what you are to do in the premises. Given under my hand and seal the eighth day of August, Anno Dom., 1737. Tuo. CHRISTIE." Wesley was arrested, and brought before the recorder for examination. When questioned upon this matter, he re- 108 u Charters and Coristitutions," Pennsylvania. 660 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. plied that "the giving or refusing the Lord's Supper being a matter purely ecclesiastical, I could not acknowledge their power to interrogate me upon it." The case was deferred to the next regular sitting of the court. When the court con- vened, the judge charged the grand jury to " beware of spiritual tyranny, and to oppose the new illegal authority that was usurped over their consciences." The grand jury, says "Wesley, was thus composed : " One was a Frenchman who did not understand English, one a Papist, one a profest infidel, three Baptists, sixteen or seventeen others, dissenters, and several others who had personal quarrels against me, and had openly vow'd revenge." A majority of this grand jury framed an indictment of ten counts, as follows : " That John "Wesley, clerk, has broken the laws of the realm, con- trary to the peace of our sovereign lord the king, his crown and dignity. "1. By speaking and writing to Mrs. Williamson against her hus- band's consent. " 2. By repelling her from the holy communion. "3. By not declaring his adherence to the Church of England. "4. By dividing the morning service on Sundays. "5. By refusing to baptize Mr. Parker's child otherwise than by dipping, except the parents would certify it was weak, and not able to bear it. "6. By repelling Wm. Gough from the holy communion. " 7. By refusing tq read the burial service over the body of Nathaniel Polhill. " 8. By calling himself ordinary of Savannah. " 9. By refusing to receive Wm. Agliorly as a godfather, only be- cause he was not a communicant. " 10. By refusing Jacob Matthews for the same reason, and baptizing an Indian trader's child with only two sponsors. The prosecution was made to drag along with Wesley neither convicted nor acquitted, but held, as" he describes it, as a sort of "prisoner at large," until, willing to bear it no longer, he determined to go back to England. That he should leave Georgia and go somewhere was just what the Georgians wanted, and although a pretense of opposing his MARTIN LUTHER AND ROGER WILLIAMS, 061 going was made, they were glad when he left, December 2, 1737.109 Of the Southern colonies, Virginia took the lead, and was next to Massachusetts in intolerance and persecution. The colony was divided into parishes, and all the inhabitants were taxed to maintain the worship of the Episcopal Church. All the people were required to attend the churches of the establishment. The rights of citizenship were dependent upon membership in the Episcopal Church. Whoever failed to attend church any Sunday "without an allowable excuse," was to be fined one pound of tobacco, and if any one should be absent from Sunday service for a month, the fine was fifty pounds of tobacco. Virginia, however, though standing in the lead of the Southern colonies in the severity of its religious legislation, was the first of all the colonies to separate Church and State, and to declare and secure by statute the religious rights of all men. From this review of Protestantism, it plainly appears that after Martin Luther, until the rise of Roger Williams, not a single Reformer preached in sincerity the principles of Christianity and of Protestantism as to the rights of con- science, and that in not a single place except the colony of Rhode Island, was there even recognized, much less exem- plified, the Christian and Protestant principle of the separa- tion of Church and State, of the religious and civil powers. Throughout this whole period we find that in all the dis- cussions, and all the work, of the professed champions of the rights of conscience, there everywhere appears the fatal defect that it was only their own rights of conscience that they either asserted or defended. In other words, their argument simply amounted to this : It is our inalienable 109 "John Wesley a Missioner to Georgia," by William Stevens Perry, D. D., bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church of Iowa ; New York Independent, March 5, 1891, pp. 5, 6. 50 662 PROTESTANTISM TRUE AND FALSE. right to believe and worship as we choose. It is likewise our inalienable right to compel everybody else to believe and worship as we choose. But this is no assertion at all of the rights of conscience. The true principle and assertion of the rights of conscience is not our assertion of our right to believe and worship as we choose. This always leaves the way open for the addi- tional assertion of our right to compel others to believe and worship as we choose, should occasion seem to demand ; and there are a multitude of circumstances that are ever ready strongly to urge that occasion does demand. The true principle and the right assertion of the rights of conscience is our assertion of every other man's right to be- lieve and worship as he chooses, or not to worship at all if lie chooses. This at once sweeps away every excuse and every argument that might ever be offered for the restriction or the invasion of the rights of conscience by any person or any power. This is the Christian doctrine. This is the Roger Wil- liams doctrine. This is the genuine Protestant doctrine, for it is " the logical consequence of either of the two great dis- tinguishing principles of the Reformation, as well of justifica- tion by faith alone as of the equality of all believers." Bancroft. no In the promulgation of the principles of Protestantism, and in the work of the Reformation, the names of MARTIN LUTHER and ROGER WILLIAMS can never rightly be sepa- rated. Williams completed what Luther began ; and to- gether they gave anew to the world, and for all time, the principles originally announced by Him who was the Author and Finisher of the faith of both JESUS CHRIST, THE AUTHOR OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY. 110 " History of the United States," chap. " Self-Government in Massa- chusetts," par. 23. I I EH < M W H K CHAPTER XXIV, THE NEW REPUBLIC. came the American Revolution, overturning all i. the principles of the papacy, and establishing for the enlightenment of all nations, THE NEW REPUBLIC, the first national government upon the earth that accords with the principles announced by Jesus Christ for mankind and for civil government. The American Revolution did not consist in the establish- ment of a government independent of Great Britain, but in the ideas concerning man and government that were pro- claimed and established by it. This Revolution is the ex- pression of two distinct ideas. First, that government is of the people ; and, second, that government is of right entirely separate from religion. The first decided step in this grand revolution was taken when the Declaration of Independence was signed. That immortal document declares : "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal ; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights ; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organiz- ing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." Thus in two sentences was annihilated the despotic doctrine which, springing from the usurped authority of the [663] 664 THE NEW REPUBLIC. papacy, to sit in the place of God and to set up and pull down kings, and to bestow kingdoms and empires at its will, had now become venerable, if not absolutely hallowed, by the precedents of a thousand years the doctrine of the divine right of kings ; and in the place of the old, false, despotic theory of the sovereignty of the government and the subjection of the people, there was declared the self- evident truth, the subjection of government, and the sovereignty of the people. In declaring the equal and inalienable right of all men to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that gov- ernments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, there is not only declared the sovereignty of the people, but also the entire capability of the people. The declaration, in itself, presupposes that men are men indeed, and that as such they are fully capable of deciding for them- selves as to what is best for their happiness, and how they shall pursue it, without the government's being set up as a parent or guardian to deal with them as with children. In declaring that governments are instituted by the gov- erned, for certain ends, and that when any government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new govern- ment, in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness, it is likewise declared that instead of the people's needing to be cared for by the gov- ernment, the government must he cared for hy the people. This is confirmed by the national Constitution, which is but the complement of the Declaration. Thus says THE PREAMBLE I " We, tJie people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." CIVIL GOVERNMENT WHOLLY IMPERSONAL. 665 And Article IX of Amendments says : "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. And Article X of Amendments says : " The powers not delegated to the United States by this Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to tlie people." In declaring the objects of government to be to secure to the people the rights which they already possess in full measure and inalienable degree, and to effect their safety and happiness in the enjoyment of those rights ; and in declaring the right of the people, in the event named, to alter or abolish the government which they have, and insti- tute a new one on such principles and in such form as to them seems best ; there is likewise declared not only the complete subordination but also the absolute impersonality of government. It is therein declared that the government is but a device, a piece of political machinery, framed and set up by the people, by which they would make themselves secure in the enjoyment of the inalienable rights which they already possess as men, and which they have by virtue of being men in society and not by virtue of government ; the right which was theirs before government was ; which is their own in the essential meaning of the term ; and ' ' which they do not hold by any sub-infeudation, but by direct hom- age and allegiance to the Owner and Lord of all " (Stanley Matthews *), their Creator, who has endowed them with those rights. And in thus declaring the impersonality of govern- ment, there is wholly uprooted every vestige of any character of paternity in the government. In declaring the equality of all men in the possession of these inalienable rights, there is likewise declared the strong- x ln Argument In Cincinnati Case, Minor et al, on "Bible In the Public Schools," p. 241. 666 THE NEW REPUBLIC. est possible safeguard of the people. For this being the dec- laration of the people, each one of the people stands thereby pledged to the support of the principle thus declared. There- fore, each individual is pledged, in the exercise of his own inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happi- ness, so to act as not to interfere with any other person in the free and perfect exercise of his inalienable right to life, lib- erty, and the pursuit of happiness. Any person who so acts as to restrict or interfere with the free exercise of any other person's right to life, or liberty, or the pursuit of happiness, denies the principle, to the maintenance of which he is pledged, and does in effect subvert the government. For, rights being equal, if one may so act, every other one may do so ; and thus no man's right is recognized, government is gone, and only anarchy remains. Therefore, by every interest, personal as well as general, private as well as pub- lic, every individual among the people is pledged in the en- joyment of his right to life, or liberty, or the pursuit of happiness, so to conduct himself as not to interfere in the least degree with the equal right of every other one to the free and full exercise of his enjoyment of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. "For the rights of man, as man, must be understood in a sense that can admit of no single exception ; for to allege an exception is the same thing as to deny the principle." We reject, therefore, with scorn, any profession of, respect to the principle which, in fact, comes to us clogged and contradicted by a petition for an excep- tion. . . . To profess the principle and then to plead for an exception, let the plea be what it may, is to deny the prin- ciple, and it is to utter a treason against humanity. The rights of man must everywhere all the world over be recog- nized and respected." Isaac Taylor? The Declaration of Independence, therefore, announces the perfect principle of civil government. If the principle thus announced were perfectly conformed to by all, then the government would be a perfect civil government. It is but 2 Quoted by Stanley Matthews, Id., p. 243. IT IS THE SCRIPTURAL IDEA. 667 the principle of self-government government of the peo- ple, by the people, and for the people. And to the extent to which this principle is exemplified among the people, to the extent to which the individual governs himself, just to that extent and no further will prevail the true idea of the Dec- laration, and the republic which it created. Such is the first grand idea of the American Revolution. And it is the scriptural idea, the idea of Jesus Christ and of God. Let this be demonstrated. The Declaration holds that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, and that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men deriv- ing their just powers from the consent of the governed. Now the Creator of all men is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and "is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles \ Yes, of the Gentiles also.' 1 And as he " hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth" (Acts xvii, 26), "there is no respect of persons with God." Rom. ii, 11. Nor is this the doctrine of the later scripture only ; it is the doc- trine of all the Book. The most ancient writings in the Book have these words : "IM did despise the cause of my man-servant or of my maid-servant when they contended with rne ; what then shall I do when God riseth up ? and when he visiteth, what shall I answer him ? Did not he that made me in the womb, make him ? " Job xxxi, 13- 15. And, "The Lord your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty and a terrible, which re- gardeth not persons, nor taketh reward : he doth execute the judgment of the fatherless and widow, and loveth the stranger in giving him food and raiment. Love ye there- fore the stranger." "The stranger that dwelleth with you, shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself." Deut. x, 17-19 ; Lev. xix, 34. All men are indeed created equal, and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. 668 THE NEW REPUBLIC. As to civil government, the Scripture commands, " Ren- der to Caesar the things which are Caesar's ; " and Christ himself paid tribute to Caesar, "thus recognizing the right- fulness of civil government to be." But more than this, it is plainly declared, "The powers that be are ordained of God." Rom. xiii, 1. This scripture has long been used to sustain the papal fable of the divine right of kings, but such use was always only a perversion. It is proper and inter- esting to have a scriptural answer to the question. How then are the powers that be ordained of God ? And to this question, the Scriptures do give a clear answer. Let us read : "In the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim, the son of Josiah king of Judah, came this word unto Jeremiah from the Lord, saying, Thus saith the Lord to me : Make thee bonds and yokes, and put them upon thy neck, and send them to the king of Edom, and to the king of Moab, and to the king of the Ammonites, and to the king of Tyrus, and to the king of Zidon, by the hand of the messengers which come to Jerusalem unto Zedekiah king of Judah, and command them to say unto their masters, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel : Thus shall ye say unto your masters : I rTave made the earth, the man and the beasts that are upon the ground, by my great power and by my outstretched arm, and have given it unto whom it seemed meet unto me. And now have I given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadezzar the king of Babylon, my servant ; and the beasts of the field have I given him also to serve him. And all nations shall serve him, and his son, and his son's son, until the very time of his land come, and then many nations and great kings shall serve them- selves of him. And it shall come to pass that the nation and kingdom which will not serve the same Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, and that will not put their neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon, that nation will I punish,, saith the Lord, with the sword, and with the famine, and with the pestilence, until I have consumed them by his hand." HOW ARE THE POWERS THAT BE, ORDAINED? C69 In this scripture it is clearly shown that the power of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, was ordained of God : nor to Nebuchadnezzar alone, but to his son and his son's son : which is to say that the power of the Babylonian em- pire, as an imperial power, was ordained of God. Neb- uchadnezzar was plainly called by the Lord, " My servant ; " and the Lord says, " And now have /given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon." He further says that whatever "nation and kingdom which / will not serve the same Nebuchadnezzar the king of Baby- lon, and that will not put their neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon, that nation will I punish." Another instance : In the above scripture it is stated that the power of Babylon should continue through Nebuchad- nezzar and his son and to his son's son, and that all nations should serve Babylon until that time, and that then nations and kings should serve themselves of him. Other prophecies "show that Babylon was then to be destroyed. Jer. li, 28 says that the king of the Medes, and all his land, with the captains and rulers, should be prepared against Babylon to destroy it. Isa. xxi, 2 shows that Persia (Elam) should ac- company Media in the destruction of Babylon. Isa. xlv, 14 names Cyrus as the leader of the forces, more than a hundred years before he was born, and one hundred and seventy-four years before the time. And of Cyrus, the prophet said from the Lord, "I have raised him up in right- eousness, and I will direct all his ways ; he shall build my city, and he shall let go my captives, not for price, nor re- ward, saith the Lord of hosts." Isa. xlv, 13. But in the conquest of Babylon, Cyrus was only the leader of the forces. The kingdom and rule were given to Darius the Mede ; for, said Daniel to Belshazzar, on the night when Babylon fell, "Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians." Then the record proceeds : "In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain. And Darius the Median took the kingdom." Of him we read in Dan. xi, 1, 670 THE NEW REPUBLIC. the words of the angel Gabriel to the prophet : "I, in the first year of Darius the Mede, even I, stood to confirm and to strengthen him." There can be no dispute, therefore, that the power of Babylon, as exercised by Nebuchadnezzar and his succes- sors, and that of Medo-Persia as exercised by Darius and Cyrus and their successors, was ordained of God. It would be easy to follow the same truth onward to the power of Grecia, in Alexander and his successors, and to Rome, as indeed it was Nero who was emperor when this letter was written to the Christians at Rome, in which is this declara- tion that " the powers that be are ordained of God." Was then the pow r er exercised by Nebuchadnezzar and his successors unto Nero was this power bestowed upon any of these directly, or in a miraculous way ? Did God send a prophet or a priest to anoint any of these rulers to be king or emperor ? or did he send a heav- enly messenger, as he did to Moses and to Gideon? Neither. Nebuchadnezzar was king because he was the son of his father, who had been king. How then did his father become king? In 625 B. c., Babylonia was but one province of the empire of Assyria ; Media was another. Both re- volted, and at the same time. The king of Assyria gave Nabopolassar command of a large force, and sent him to Babylonia to quell the revolt, while he himself led other forces into Media, to put down the insurrection there. Nabopolassar did his work so well in Babylonia that the king of Assyria rewarded him with the command of that province, with the title of king of Babylon. Thus Nabopolassar received his power from the king of Assyria. The king of Assyria received his from his father, Asshur-bani-pal ; Asshur-bani-pal received his from his father, Esar-haddon ; Esar-haddon received his from his father, Sennacherib ; Sennacherib received his from his father, Sargon ; and Sargon received his from the troops in the field, that is. from the people ; for the army of Assyria THE AMERICAN DOCTRINE IS SCRIPTURAL. 671 was not a standing army, as those of modern nations are, but it was the male portion of the nation itself, at war. Thus it was, and thus only, that the power of Nebuchadnezzar and his son and his sou's son, was ordained of God. It was simply providential, and was brought about and worked out as is anything and everything else in the realm of the provi- dence of God. It was so, likewise, with all the others. And it has always been so in every case, in every government, that ever was on earth, except only in the nation of Israel. Yet more than this, except in the nation of Israel, it is not, and never has been, personal sovereigns in themselves that have been referred to in the statement that " the powers that be are ordained of God." It is not the persons that be in power, but the powers that be in the person, that are ordained of God. The inquiry of Rom. xiii, 3, is not, Wilt thou then not be afraid of the person ? But it is, ' ' "Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power ? " It is not the person, therefore, but the power that is represented in the person, that is under consideration here. And that person derives his power from the people, as is clearly proved by the scriptural examples and references given. And this is the American doctrine, the doctrine of the Declaration of Independence. In the discussions which brought forth the Declaration and developed the Revolution, the doctrine found expression in the following forceful and eloquent words : " Government is founded not on force, as was the theory of Hobbes ; nor on compact, as was the theory of Locke and of the revolution of 1688 ; nor on property, as was asserted by Harrington. It springs from the necessities of our nature, and has an everlasting founda- tion in the unchangeable will of God. Man came into the world and into society at the same instant. There must exist in every earthly society a supreme sovereign, from whose final decision there can be no appeal but directly to heaven. This supreme power is originally and ultimately in the people ; and the people never did in fact freely, nor can 672 THE NEW REPUBLIC. rightfully, make an unlimited renunciation of this divine right. Kingcraft and priestcraft are a trick to gull the vulgar. The happiness of mankind demands that this grand and ancient alliance should be broken off forever. "The omniscient and omnipotent Monarch of the uni- verse has, by the grand charter given to the human race, placed the end of government in the good of the whole. The form of government is left to the individuals of each society ; its whole superstructure and administration should be conformed to the law of universal reason. There can be no prescription old enough to supersede the law of nature and the grant of God Almighty, who has given all men a right to be free. If every prince since Nimrod had been a tyrant, it would not prove a right to tyrannize. The admin- istrators of legislative and executive authority, when they verge toward tyranny, are to be resisted ; if they prove, in- corrigible, are to be deposed. " The first principle and great end of government being to provide for the best good of all the people, this can be done only by a supreme legislative and executive, ultimately in the people, or whole community, where God has placed it ; but the difficulties attending a universal congress, gave rise to a right of representation. Such a transfer of the power of the whole to a few was necessary ; but to bring the powers of all into the hands of one or some few, and to make them hereditary, is the interested work of the weak and the wicked. Nothing but life and liberty are actually heredi- tablc. The grand political problem is to invent the best combination of the powers of legislation and execution!' They must exist in the State, just as in the revolution of the planets ; one power would fix them to a center, and another carry them off indefinitely ; but the first and simple prin- ciple is, EQUALITY and THE POWER OF THE WHOLE. . . . "The British colonists do not hold their liberties or their lands by so slippery a tenure as the will of the prince. Colonists are men, the common children of the same Crea- THE DECLARATION ASSERTS THE TRUTH. 673 tor with their brethren of Great Britain. The colonists are men : the colonists are therefore freeborn ; for, by the law of nature, all men are freeborn, white or black. ' No good reason can be given for enslaving those of any color. Is it right to enslave a man because his color is black, or his hair short and curled like wool, instead of Christian hair ? Can any logical inference in favor of slavery be drawn from a flat nose or a long or short face? The riches of the West Indies, or the luxury of the metropolis, should not have weight to break the balance of truth and justice. Liberty is the gift of God, and cannot be annihilated. ' ' Nor do the political and civil rights of the British colo- nists rest on a charter from the crown. Old Magna Charta was not the beginning of all things, nor did it rise on the borders of chaos out of the unformed mass. A time may come when Parliament shall declare every American charter void ; but the natural, inherent, and inseparable rights of the colonists, as men and as citizens, can never be abolished. . . . The world is at the eve of the highest scene of earthly power and grandeur that has ever yet been displayed to the view of mankind. Who will win the prize, is with God. But human nature must and will be rescued from the general slavery that has so long triumphed over the species." James Otis. 3 Thus spoke an American "for his country and for the race," bringing to "the conscious intelligence of the people the elemental principles of free government and human rights." Outside of the theocracy of Israel, there never has been a ruler or an executive on earth whose authority was not, primarily or ultimately, expressly or permissively, derived from the people. It is not particular sovereigns whose power is ordained of God, nor any particular form of government. It is the geniiis of government itself. The absence of government is 3 Quoted iii Bancroft's " History of the United States," Vol. iii, chap. Til, par. 14-21. 674 THE NEW REPUBLIC. anarchy. Anarchy is only governmental confusion. But says the scripture, ''God is not the author of confusion." God is the 4 God of order. He has ordained order, and he has put within man himself that idea of government, of self-protection, which is the first law of nature, and which organizes itself into forms of one kind or another, wherever men dwell on the face of the earth. And it is for men themselves to say what shall be the form of government under which they will dwell. One people has one form ; another has another. This genius of civil order springs from God ; it matters not whether it be exercised through one form of government or through another, the govern- mental power and order thus exercised is ordained of God. If the people choose to change their form of government, it is still the same power ; it is to be respected still, because in its legitimate exercise, it is still ordained of God. It is demonstrated, therefore, that where the Declaration of Independence says that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, it asserts THE ETERNAL TRUTH OF GoD. The second grand idea of the American Revolution that government is of right entirely separate from religion is the logical sequence of the first. RELIGION is defined as "the recognition of God as an object of worship, love, and obedience." And again, as "man's personal relation of faith and obedience to God." And the first governmental definition of the word in the United States, declared that "-religion" is "the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it." Now governments deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, can never of right exercise any power not delegated by the governed. But religion pertain- ing solely to man's relation to God, and the duty which he owes to his Creator, in the nature of things can never be delegated. It is utterly impossible for any person ever, in any degree, to transfer to another any relationship to God GOVERNMENT AND RELIGION RIGHTLY 8EPARA TE. 675 or any duty which he owes to his Creator. To attempt to do so would be to deny God and renounce religion, and even then the thing would not be done his relationship to God would still abide as firmly as ever. Logically and rightfully, therefore, the government of the United States disavows any jurisdiction or power in things religious. Religion is not, and never can rightly be made, in any sense a requisite to the governmental authority of the United States, because the supreme law declares that- " No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." 4 The government cannot rightly legislate in any sense upon matters of religion, because the supreme law says that- " Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." 5 By this clause, Congress is forbidden to make any law looking toward any establishment of a national religion, or approving or disapproving any religion already established in any State as several of the States had established re- ligions when this amendment was adopted. By it likewise Congress is forbidden to make any law prohibiting the free exercise of religion by any individual in all the land. That is to say that Congress is forbidden to make any law bear- ing in any way whatever on the subject of religion ; for it is impossible to make a law on the subject of religion with- out interfering with the free exercise of religion. No law can ever be made even in favor of any religion without prohibiting the free exercise of that religion. No man can ever sanction legislation in favor of the religion in which he believes without robbing himself of the free exercise of that religion. Congress, therefore, is absolutely forbidden ever 4 Constitution, Article vi. 6 Id., First Amendment. 51 676 TEE NEW REPUBLIC. to make any law on the subject of religion in any way whatever. Consistently with all this, and as the crown of all, relig- ion is not in any sense a requisite to the citizenship of the United States, for again the supreme law declares : "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." 6 Thus logically by the Declaration and explicitly by the Constitution, the government of the United States is com- pletely separated from religion. And such is the second grand idea of the American Revolution. And it is also the scriptural idea, the idea of Jesus Christ, and of God. Let this be demonstrated, and it will be proved that the American system of government is complete and the idea perfect. And demonstrated it can easily be. To the definition that religion is the recognition of God, as an object of worship, love, and obedience, the scripture responds: "It is written, as I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God." Eom. xiv, 11, 12. And, to the statement that religion is man's personal rela- tion of faith and obedience to God, the scripture responds : "Hast thou faith ? Have it to thyself before God." Rom. xiv, 22. "For we must all appear before the judgment- seat of Christ ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad." 2 Cor. v, 10. No government can ever account to God for any individ- ual. No man nor any set of men can ever have faith for another. No government will ever stand before the judg- ment-seat of Christ to answer even for itself ; much less for the people or for any individual. Therefore, no government can ever of right assume any responsibility in any way in any matter of religion. ""Treaty with Tripoli," Article ii. GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY NOT RELIGIOUS. 6T7 As to religion and government, Christ commanded, "Render to Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." To Caesar to govern- ment there is to be rendered only that which is Caesar's ; while that which is God's is to be rendered to God alone. Men are not to render to Caesar that which is God's, nor are they to render to God l>y Caesar that which is God's. That which is Caesar's is to be rendered to him alone. That which is God's is to be rendered to him alone. Now, as religion pertains to man's relations to God, it is to be rendered to God alone. It does not pertain to government ; it never can be rendered to government. Christ has forbidden that it should be so rendered. Therefore, the word of Jesus Christ does distinctly and decidedly separate religion from earthly government. Nor is this the only passage of Scripture on this subject. It is the doctrine of the Book. In the former part of this chapter, we have shown by the Scriptures that earthly governments the powers that be are ordained of God. By the scriptures cited, we have seen that the power of Babylonia, as represented by Nebuchad- nezzar, and the power of Media and Persia, as represented by Darius and Cyrus, was distinctly declared to be ordained of God. Now it is important to inquire, Unto what was this power ordained? Was there any limit set to it? In short, Was this power which was ordained of God, ordained to be exercised in things pertaining to God, that is, in matters of religion ? These questions are clearly answered in the Scriptures. In the third chapter of Daniel we have the record that Nebuchadnezzar made a great image of gold, set it up in the plain of Dura, and gathered together the princes, the governors, the captains, the judges, the treasurers, the coun- selors, the sheriffs, and all the rulers of the provinces, to the dedication of the image ; and they stood before the image that had been set up. Then a herald from the king cried aloud : "To you it is commanded, O people, nations, and languages, that at what time ye hear the sound of the 678 THE NEW REPUBLIC. cornet, flute, . harp, sackbut, psaltery, dulcimer, and all kinds of music, ye fall down and worship the golden image that Nebuchadnezzar the king hath set up ; and whoso falleth not down and worshipeth shall the same hour be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace." In obedience to this command, all the people bowed down and worshiped before the image, except three Jews, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego. This disobedience was reported to Nebuchadnezzar, who commanded them to be brought before him, when he asked them if they had dis- obeyed his order intentionally. He himself then repeated his command to them. These men knew that they had been made subject to the king of Babylon by the Lord himself. It had not only been prophesied by Isaiah (chap, xxxix), but also by Jeremiah. At the final siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, the Lord, through Jeremiah, told the people to submit to the king of Babylon, arid that whosoever would do it, it should be well with them ; whosoever would not do it, it should be ill with them. Yet these men, knowing all this, made answer to Nebuchadnezzar thus: "O Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this matter. If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thy hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up." Then the three men were cast into the fiery furnace, heated seven times hotter than it was wont to be heated ; but suddenly Nebuchadnezzar rose up in haste and astonish- ment, and said to his counselors, "Did we not cast three men l>ound into the midst of the fire ? " They answered, "True, O king." But he exclaimed, " Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt ; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God." The men were called forth. "Then Nebuchadnezzar spake DANIEL AND THE GOVERNMENT. 679 and said, Blessed be the God of Shadracli, JVIeshach, and Abed-nego, who hath sent his angel and delivered his serv- ants that trusted in him, and have changed the king's word, and yielded their bodies, that they might not serve nor worship any god, except their own God." Here stand the following facts : First,. God gave power to the kingdom of Babylon ; second, he suffered his people to be subjected as captives to that power ; third, by a wonderful miracle he defended his people from a certain exercise of that power. Did God contradict or oppose himself? Far from it. What, then, do these facts show? They show conclusively that this was an undue exercise of the power which God had given. By this it is demon- strated that the power of the kingdom of Babylon, al- though ordained of God, was not ordained unto any such purpose as that for which it was exercised ; that though ordained of God, it was not ordained to be exercised in things pertaining to God, or men's rights of religion ; and it was written for the instruction of future ages, and for our admonition upon whom the ends of the world are come. Another example : Darius, king of Media and Persia, made Daniel prime minister of his dominion. But a num- ber of the presidents and princes, envious of the position given to Daniel, attempted to undermine and displace him. After earnest efforts to find occasion against him in matters pertaining to the kingdom, they were forced to confess that there was neither error nor fault anywhere in his conduct. Then said these men, "We shall not find any 'occasion against this Daniel, except we find it against him concern- ing the law of his God." They therefore assembled to- gether to the king, and told him that all the presidents of the kingdom, and the governors, and the princes, and the captains, had consulted together to establish a royal statute, and to make a decree that whoever should ask a petition of any god or man, except the king, for thirty days, should be 680 THE NEW REPUBLIC 1 . cast into the den of lions. Darius, not suspecting their ob- ject, signed the decree. Daniel knew that the decree had been made, and signed by the king. It was hardly possible for him not to know it, being prime minister. Yet notwithstanding his knowl- edge of the affair, he went into his chamber, and his windows being- open toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed and gave thanks before God, as he did aforetime. He did not even close the windows. He simply paid no attention at all to the decree that had been made, although it forbade his do- ing as he did, under the penalty of being thrown to the lions. As was to be expected, the men who had secured the passage of the decree, "found" him praying and making supplications before his God. They went at once to the king, and asked him if he had not signed a decree that every man who should ask a petition of any god or man within thirty days, except of the king, should be cast into the den of lions. The king replied that this was true, and that, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, it could not be altered. Then they told him that Daniel did not regard the king, nor the decree that he had signed, but made his petition three times a day. The king realized in a moment that he had been entrapped ; but there was no remedy. Those who were pushing the matter, held before him the law, and said, " Know, O king, that the law of the JViedes and Persians is, That no decree or statute which the king established! may be changed." Nothing could be done ; the decree, being law, must be en- forced. Daniel was cast to the lions. In the morning the king came to the den and called to Daniel, and Daniel re- plied, " O king, live forever ; my God hath sent his angel, and hath shut the lion's mouths, that they have not hurt me ; forasmuch as before him innocency was found in mej and also before thee, O king, I have done no hurt." If IS INTENTIONALLY SO. 681 Thus again God lias shown that although the powers that be are ordained of God, they are not ordained to act in things that pertain to men's relationship to God. God de- clares the man innocent, who disregards or violates the law that interferes with man's relationship to God, or that pre- sumes to dictate in matters of religion. These cases show plainly that, according to the mind of God, religion and earthly government are to be entirely separated. It follows, therefore, that the Constitution of the United States is in harmony with the will of God as ex- pressed in the Scriptures of truth, upon the subject of relig- ion and the State. Yet, for reasons which will appear later, there is now an attempt to make it appear that this was the result of forget- fulness, if not rather hostility to the Christian religion. But nothing could be farther from the truth than both of these suggestions. So far from its having been the result of for- getfulness, it was by direct design : and so far frorfi its hav- ing resulted from hostility to Christianity, it was out of respect for it and for the rights of men which that religion inculcates. It is impossible for it to have been in any way a matter of forgetfulness, because the Constitution speaks expressly upon the subject. Yet, though the Constitution had been wholly silent on the question, the fact could not be justly attributed to forgetfulness or carelessness ; because the work of the Convention was not the adoption of the Constitution. After the Convention had finished its labors, that which they had done was submitted for approval to the thirteen States, every one of which was most vigilantly wakeful to detect every possible defect in it ; and as we shall presently see, this point was discussed by the States when the proposed Constitution came before them for approval. And that the Constitution was made as it is, in this mat- ter, entirely out of respect to religion and to Christianity in particular, is susceptible of the strongest proof. In fact, 682 THE NEW REPUBLIC. Christian churches were the chief factors in the movement. We have already shown that the Constitution is the comple- ment of the Declaration of Independence ; and that this phase of the Constitution is but the logical sequence of the Declaration. Nor is this all ; it is the direct fruit of the Declaration. The history of this matter is worth reviving. June 12, 1776, a convention of the Colonial House of Burgesses of Virginia, adopted a Declaration of Rights, com- posed of sixteen sections, every one of which, in substance, afterward found a place in the Declaration of Independence and the national Constitution. The sixteenth section reads as follows : - " That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence, and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience ; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other." 7 This was followed, July 4. by the Declaration of Inde- pendence, written by Thomas Jefferson of Virginia. The Declaration of Independence had no sooner been published abroad, than the Presbytery of Hanover in Virginia, at its very first meeting, openly took its stand in the recognition of the new and independent nation, and addressed to the Virginia House of Assembly the following memorial : "To the Honorable, the General Assembly of Virginia : The memo- rial of the Presbytery of Hanover humbly represents : That your memo- rialists are governed by the same sentiments which have inspired the United States of America, and are determined that nothing in our power and influence shall be wanting to give success to their common cause. We would also represent that dissenters from the Church of England in this countiy have ever been desirous to conduct themselves as peaceable members of the civil government, for which reason they have hitherto sub- mitted to various ecclesiastic burdens and restrictions that are inconsis- tent with equal liberty. But now when the many and grievous oppressions 7 " Charters and Constitutions," Virginia. THE PRESBYTERY OF IIANOVER. Q83 of our mother country have laid this continent under the necessity of casting off the yoke of tyranny, and of forming independent govern- ments upon equitable and liberal foundations, we flatter ourselves that we thall be freed from all the incumbrauces which a spirit of domination, prejudice, or bigotry has interwoven with most other political systems. This we are the more strongly encouraged to expect by the Declaration of Rights, so universally applauded for that dignity, firmness, and precision with which it delineates and asserts the privileges of society, and the prerogatives of human nature ; and which we embrace as the Magna Charta of our commonwealth, that can never be violated without en- dangering the grand superstructure it was designed to sustain. Therefore, we rely upon this Declaration, as well as the justice of our honorable legis- lature, to secure us the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of our own consciences : and we should fall short in our duty to our- selves, and the many and numerous congregations under our care, were we, upon this occasion, to neglect laying before you a statement of the religious grievances under which we have hitherto labored, that they may no longer be continued in our present form of government. "It is well known that in the frontier counties, which are justly supposed to contain a fifth part of the inhabitants of Virginia, the dis- senters have borne the heavy burdens of purchasing glebes, building churches, and supporting the established clergy, where there are very few Episcopalians, either to assist in bearing the expense, or to reap the advantage ; and that throughout other parts of the country there are also many thousands of zealous friends and defenders of our State, who, besides the invidious and disadvantageous restrictions to which they have been subjected, annually pay large taxes to support an establish- ment from which their consciences and principles oblige them to dis- sent ; all which are confessedly so many violations of their natural rights, and, in their consequences, a restraint upon freedom of inquiry and private judgment. " In this enlightened age, and in a land where all of every denomi- nation are united in the most strenuous efforts to be free, we hope and expect that our representatives will cheerfully concur in removing every species of religious as well as civil bondage. Certain it is, that every argument for civil liberty gains additional strength when applied to lib- erty in the concerns of religion ; and there is no argument in favor of establishing the Christian religion but may be pleaded, with equal pro- priety, for establishing the tenets of Mohammed by those who believe the Alcoran ; or, if this be not true, it is at least impossible for the magis- trate to adjudge the right of preference among the various sects that profess the Christian faith, without erecting a claim to infallibility, which would lead us back to the Church of Rome. 684 THE NEW REPUBLIC. "We beg leave farther to represent, that religious establishments are highly injurious to the temporal interests of any community. With- out insisting upon the ambition and the arbitrary practices of those who are favored by government, or the intriguing, seditious spirit which is commonly excited by this, as well as by every other kind of oppression, such establishments greatly retard population, and, consequently, the progress of arts, sciences, and manufactures. Witness the rapid growth and improvement of the Northern provinces compared with this. No one can deny that the more early settlements and the many superior ad- vantages of our country, would have invited multitudes of artificers, me- chanics, and other ^useful members of society, to fix their habitation among us, who have either remained in their place of nativity, or pre- ferred worse civil governments, and a more barren soil, where they might enjoy the rights of conscience more fully than they had a prospect of do- ing in this ; from which we infer that Virginia might have now been the capital of America, and a match for the British arms, without de- pending on others for the necessaries of war, had it not been prevented by her religious establishment. " Neither can it be made to appear that the gospel needs any such civil aid. We rather conceive that, when our blessed Saviour declares his kingdom is not of this world, he renounces all dependence upon State power ; and as his weapons are spiritual, and were only designed to have influence on the judgment and heart of men, we are persuaded that if mankind were left in quiet possession of their inalienable religious privileges, Christianity, as in the days of the apostles, would continue to prevail and flourish in the greatest purity by its own native excellence, and under the all-disposing providence of God. "We would also humbly represent, that the only proper objects of civil government are the happiness and protection of men in the present state of existence, the security of the life, liberty, and property of the citizens, and to restrain the vicious and encourage the virtuous by wholesome laws, equally extending to every individual ; but that the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can only be directed by reason and conviction, and is nowhere cogniz- able but at the tribunal of the universal Judge. "Therefore we ask no ecclesiastical establishments for ourselves; neither can we approve of them when granted to others. This, indeed, would be giving exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges to one set of men, without any special public services, to the common reproach and injury of every other denomination. And for the reason recited, we are induced earnestly to entreat that all laws now in force in this commonwealth, which countenance religious domination, may be speedily repealed ; that all of every religious sect may be protected in THEIR SECOND MEMORIAL. 685 the full exercise of their several modes of worship ; exempted from all taxes for the support of any church whatsoever, farther than what may be agreeable to their own private choice or voluntary obligation. This being done, all partial and invidious distinction will be abolished, to the great honor and interest of the State, and every one be left to stand or fall according to his merit, which can never be the case so long as any one denomination is established in preference to the others. "That the great Sovereign of the universe may inspire you with unanimity, wisdom, and resolution, and bring you to a just determina- tion on all the important concerns before you, is the fervent prayer of your memorialists." 8 The Presbytery of Hanover was immediately joined in the good work by the Baptists and the Quakers, who sent up petitions to the same purpose. The Episcopalian was the established church of Virginia, and had been ever since the planting of the colony. The Episcopalians and the Methodists sent up counter-memorials, pleading for a con- tinuance of the system of established religion. Two mem- bers of the assembly, Messrs. Pendleton and Nicolas, cham- pioned the establishment, and Jefferson, as ever, espoused the cause of liberty and right. After nearly two months of what Jefferson pronounced the severest contest in which he was ever engaged, the cause of freedom prevailed, and December 6, 1776, the Assembly passed a law repealing all the colonial laws and penalties prejudicial to dissenters, releasing them from any further compulsory contributions to the Episcopal Church, and discontinuing the State sup- port of the Episcopal clergy after January 1, 1777. A motion was then made to levy a general tax for the support of all denominations, but it was postponed till a future Assembly. To the next Assembly petitions were sent strongly pleading for the general assessment. But the Presbytery of Hanover, still strongly supported by the Bap- tists and the Quakers, was again on hand with a memorial, in which it referred to the points previously presented, and then proceeded as follows : 8 Balrd's "Religion in America," book iii, chap, iii, par. 9-16. 686 THE NEW REPUBLIC. " We would also humbly represent, that the only proper objects of civil government are the happiness and protection of men in the present state of existence, the security of the life, liberty, and property of the citizens, and to restrain the vicious and to encourage the virtuous by wholesome laws, equally extending to every individual ; but that the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can only be directed by reason and conviction, and is nowhere cogniz- able but at the tribunal of the universal Judge. "To illustrate and confirm these assertions, we beg leave to observe, that to judge for ourselves, and to engage in the exercise of religion agreeably to the dictates of our own consciences, is an inalienable right, which, upon the principles on which the gospel was first propagated, and the Reformation from popery carried on, can never be transferred to another. Neither does the church of Christ stand in need of a gen- eral assessment for. its support ; and most certain we are that it would be of no advantage, but an injury to the society to which we belong ; and as every good Christian believes that Christ has ordained a complete system of laws for the government of his kingdom, so we are persuaded that by his providence he will support it to its final consummation. In the fixed belief of this principle, that the kingdom of Christ and the concerns of religion are beyond the limits of civil control, we should act a dishonest, inconsistent part, were we to receive any emoluments from human establishments for the support of the gospel. "These things being considered, we hope that we shall be excused for remonstrating against a general assessment for any religious purpose. As the maxims have long been approved, that every servant is to obey his master, and that the hireling is accountable for his conduct to him from whom he receives his wages ; in like manner, if the legislature has any rightful authority over the ministers of the gospel in the exercise of their sacred ofiice, and if it is their duty to levy a maintenance for them as such, then it will follow that they may revive the old establishment in its former extent, or ordain a new one for any sect they may think proper ; they are invested with a power not only to determine, but it is incumbent on them to declare who shall preach, what they shall preach, to whom, when, and in what places they shall preach ; or to impose any regulations and restrictions upon religious societies that they may judge expedient. These consequences are so plain as not to be denied, and they are so entirely subversive of religious liberty, that if they should take place in Virginia, we should be reduced to the melancholy neces- sity of saying with the apostles in like cases, ' Judge ye whether it is best to obey God or men,' and also of acting as they acted. " Therefore, as it is contrary to our principles and interest, and, as we think, subversive of religious liberty, we do again most earnestly MADISON'S MEMORIAL AND REMONSTRANCE. 687 entreat that our legislature would never extend any assessment for religious purposes to us or to the congregations under our care." 9 In 1779 they defeated the bill, which had been ordered to a third reading. But in the first Assembly after the war was over, in 1784, it was brought up again, this time with Patrick Henry as its leading advocate. It was entitled ' ' A Bill Establishing a Provision for Teachers of the Christian Religion." James Madison stood with Jefferson. As the bill was about to pass, they succeeded in carrying a motion to postpone it till the next session, but in the meantime, to have it printed and generally circulated. As soon as this had been accomplished, Madison wrote, also for general cir- culation and signature, a Memorial and Remonstrance, to be presented to the next Assembly, in opposition to the bill. This document reads as follows : "We, the subscribers, citizens of the said commonwealth, having taken into serious consideration a bill printed by order of the last session of General Assembly, entitled, 'A Bill Establishing a Provision for Teachers of the Christian Eeligion,' and conceiving that the same, if finally armed with the sanctions of a law, will be a dangerous abuse of power, are bound as faithful members of a free State to remonstrate against it, and to declare the reasons by which we are determined. We remonstrate against the said bill "1. Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth ' that religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.' The religion, then, of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man ; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable, because the opinions of men, depend- ing only on the evidence contemplated in their own minds, cannot fol- low the dictates of other men. It is unalienable, also, because what is here a right towards men is a duty towards the Creator. It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such hpmage, and such only, as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of civil society. Be- fore any man can be considered as a member of civil society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the universe : and if a mem- ber of civil society who enters into any subordinate association must 9 Id., par. 21-23, 688 THE NEW REPUBLIC. always do it with a reservation of his duty to the general authority, much more must every man who becomes a member of any particular civil so- ciety do it with a saving of his allegiance to the universal Sovereign. We maintain, therefore, that in matters of religion no man's right is abridged by the institution of civil society, and that religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance. True it is, that no other rule exists by which any question which may divide a society can be ultimately determined than the will of the majority; but it is also true that the majority may trespass upon the rights of the minority. " 2. Because, if religion be exempt from the authority of the society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the legislative body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their juris- diction is both derivative and limited. It is limited with regard to the co-ordinate departments : more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents The preservation of a free government requires not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained, but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the rights of the people. The rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by any authority derived from them, and are slaves. " 3. Because it is proper to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. We hold this prudent jealousy to be the first duty of citizens, and one of the noblest characteristics of the late Revolution. The freemen of America did not wait till usurped power had strength- ened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the con- sequences by denying the principle. We revere this lesson too much, soon to forget it. Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other religions, may establish, with the same ease, any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other sects ? that the same authority which can force a citizen to con- tribute three pence only, of his property, for the support of any one estab- lishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever ? " 4. Because the bill violates that equality which ought to be the basis of every law, and which is more indispensable in proportion as the validity or expediency of any law is more liable to be impeached. ' If all men are by nature equally free and independent,' all men are to be considered as entering into society on equal conditions : as relinquishing no more, and therefore, retaining no less, one than another, of their natural rights. Above all, are they to be considered as retaining an 'equal title to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of CHRISTIANITY DOES NOT NEED IT. 689 conscience.' Whilst we assert for ourselves a freedom to embrace, to profess, and to observe, the religion which we believe to be of divine origin, we cannot deny an equal freedom to them whose minds have not yet yielded to the evidence which has convinced us. If this freedom be abused, it is an offense against God, not against man. To God, there- fore, not to man, must an account of it be rendered. As the bill vio- lates equality by subjecting some to peculiar burdens, so it violates the same principle by granting to others peculiar exemptions. Are the Quakers and Menonists the only sects who think a compulsive support of their religions unnecessary and unwarrantable ? Can their piety alone be intrusted with the care of public worship ? Ought their relig- ions to be endowed above all others with extraordinary privileges by which proselytes may be enticed from all others ? We think too favor- ably of the justice and good sense of these denominations to believe that they either covet pre-eminences over their fellow-citizens, or that they will be seduced by them from the common opposition to the measure. "5. Because the bill implies either that the civil magistrate is a competent judge of religious truths, or that he may employ religion as an engine of civil policy. The first is an arrogant pretension, fal- sified by the contradictory opinions of rulers in all ages and through- out the world ; the second, an unhallowed perversion of the means of salvation. "6. Because the establishment proposed by the bill is not requisite for the support of the Christian religion. To say that it is, is a contra- diction to the Christian, religion itself, for every page of it disavows a dependence on the powers of this world. It is a contradiction to fact ; for it is known that this religion both existed and flourished, not only without the support of human laws, but in spite of every opposi- tion from them ; and not only during the period of miraculous aid, but long after it had been left to its own evidence and the ordinary care of providence. Nay, it is a contradiction in terms ; for a religion not in- vented by human policy must have pre-existed and been supported before it was established by human policy. It is, moreover, to weaken in those who profess this religion a pious confidence in its innate excellence and the patronage of its Author ; and to foster in those who still reject it a suspicion that its friends are too conscious of its fallacies to trust it to its own merits. "7. Because experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal estab- lishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits ? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy ; ignorance and servility in the laity ; in both superstition, bigotry, and persecution. Inquire of the teachers of Christianity for the ages in which it appeared 690 THE NEW REPUBLIC. in its greatest luster ; those of every sect point to the ages prior to its incorporation with civil policy. Propose a restoration of this primitive state, in which its teachers depended on the voluntary rewards of their flocks; many of them predict its downfall. On which side ought their testimony to have greatest weight ; when for, or when against, their interest ? "8. Because the establishment in question is not necessary for the support of civil government. If it be urged as necessary for the sup- port of civil government only as it is a means of supporting religion, and it be not necessary for the latter purpose, it cannot be necessary for the former. If religion be not within the cognizance of civil govern- ment, how can its legal establishment be necessary to civil government ? What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on civil society ? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of civil authority ; in many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny ; in no instance have they been seen the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wished to subvert the public liberty may have found in established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and per- petuate it, needs them not. Such a government will be best supported by protecting every citizen in the enjoyment of his religion with the same equal hand which protects his person and his property ; by neither invading the equal right of any sect, nor suffering any sect to invade those of another. "Because the proposed establishment is a departure from that generous policy which, offering an asylum to the persecuted and oppressed of every nation and religion, promised a luster to our country, and an acces- sion to the number of its citizens. What a melancholy mark is the bill, of sudden degeneracy ! Instead of holding forth an asylum to the perse- cuted, it is itself a signal of persecution. It degrades from the equal rank of citizens all those whose opinions in religion do not bend to those of the legislative authority. Distant as it may be in its present form from the Inquisition, it differs from it only in degree. The one is the first step, the other is the last, in the career of intolerance. The magnanimous sufferer of this cruel scourge in foreign regions must view the bill as a beacon on our coast warning him to seek some other haven, where liberty and philanthropy, in their due extent, may offer a more certain repose from his troubles. " Because it will have a like tendency to banish our citizens. The al- lurements presented by other situations are every day thinning their number. To superadd a fresh motive to emigration by revoking the liberty which they now enjoy, would be the same species of folly which has dishonored and depopulated flourishing kingdoms. IT UNDERMINES PUBLIC AUTHORITY. 691 "Because it will destroy that moderation and harmony which the forbearance of our laws to intermeddle with religion has produced among its several sects. Torrents of blood have been spilt in the Old World in consequence of vain attempts of the secular arm to extinguish religious discord by proscribing all differences in religious opinion. Time has at length revealed the true remedy. Every relaxation of narrow and rigorous policy, wherever it has been tried, has been found to assuage the disease. The American theater has exhibited proofs that equal and complete liberty, if it does not wholly eradicate it, sufficiently destroys its malignant influence on the health and prosperity of the State. If with the salutary effects of this system under our own eyes, we begin to contract the bounds of religious freedom, we know no name which will too severely reproach our folly. At least let warning be taken at the first-fruits of the threatened innovation. The very appearance of the bill has transformed ' that Christian forbearance, love, and charity,' which of late mutually prevailed, into animosities and jealousies, which may not be appeased. What mischiefs may not be dreaded, should this enemy to the public quiet be armed with the force of law ? " Because the policy of the bill is adverse to the diffusion of the light of Christianity. The first wish of those who enjoy this precious gift ought to be that it may be imparted to the whole race of mankind. Com- pare the number of those who have as yet received it with the number still remaining under the dominion of false religions, and how small is the former ? Does the policy of the bill tend to lessen the disproportion ? No ; it at once discourages those who are strangers to the light of revelation from coming into the region of it, and countenances by example tbe nations who continue in darkness in shutting out those who might convey it to them. Instead of leveling, as far as possible, every obstacle to the victorious progress of truth, the bill, with an ignoble and unchristian timidity, would circumscribe it with a wall of defense against the encroachments of error. "Because attempts to enforce, by legal sanctions, acts obnoxious to so great a proportion of citizens, tend to enervate the laws in general, and to slacken the bands of society. If it be difficult to execute any law which is not generally deemed necessary or salutary, what must be the case where it is deemed invalid and dangerous ? And what may be the effect of so striking an example of impotency in the government on its general authority ? " Because a measure of such singular magnitude and delicacy ought not to be imposed without the clearest evidence that it is called for by a majority of citizens ; and no satisfactory method is yet proposed by which the voice of the majority in this case may be determined, or its influence secured. 'The people of the respective counties are, indeed, requested 52 C92 THE NEW REPUBLIC. to signify their opinion respecting the adoption of the bill, to the next session of the Assembly.' But the representation must be made equal before the voice either of the representatives or of the counties will be that of the people. Our hope is, that neither of the former will, after due consideration, espouse the dangerous principle of the bill. Should the event disappoint us, it will still leave us in full confidence that a fair appeal to the latter will reverse the sentence against our liberties. "Because, finally, 'The equal right of every citizen to the free exer- cise of his religion, according to the dictates of conscience,' is held by the same tenure with all our other rights. If we recur to its origin, it is equally the gift of nature ; if we weigh its importance, it cannot be less dear to us ; if we consult the declaration of those rights 'which pertain to the good people of Virginia as the basis and foundation of govern- ment/ it is enumerated with equal solemnity, or rather with studied em- phasis. Either, then, we must say that the will of the legislature is the only measure of their authority, and that in the plenitude of that authority they may sweep away all our fundamental rights, or that they are bound to leave this particular right untouched and sacred. Either we must say that they may control the freedom of the press, may abolish the trial by jury, may swallow up the executive and judiciary powers of the State ; nay, that they may despoil us of our very right of suffrage, and erect themselves into an independent and hereditary assembly, or we must say that they have no authority to enact into a law the bill under consid- eration. "We, the subscribers, say that the General Assembly of this com- monwealth have no such authority. And in order that no effort may be omitted on our part against so dangerous an usurpation, we oppose to it this remonstrance ; earnestly praying, as we are in duty bound, that the Supreme Lawgiver of the universe, by illuminating those to whom it is addressed, may, on the one hand, turn their councils from every act which would affront his holy prerogative, or violate the trust committed to them ; and, on the other, guide them into every measure which may be worthy of his blessing, redound to their own praise, and establish more firmly the liberties, the prosperity, and the happiness of the common- wealth." 10 This incomparable remonstrance was so generally signed that the bill for a general assessment was not only defeated, but in its place there was passed, December 26, 1785, "An Act for Establishing Keligions Freedom," written by Thomas Jefferson, and reading as follows : 10 Blakely's " American State Papers," pp. 27-38. VIRGINIA DELIVERED. f,93 " Well aware that Almighty God hath created the mind free ; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burdens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and mean- ness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy Author of our relig- ion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his almighty power to do ; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesias- tical, who being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have as- sumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such en- deavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time ; that to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propaga- tions of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical ; that even the forcing him to support this or that teacher of his own religious persuasion, is depriving him of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to the particular pastor whose morals he would make his pattern, and whose powers he feels most persuasive to righteousness, and is "withdrawing from the ministry those temporal rewards which, proceeding from an approbation of their personal conduct, are an addi- tional incitement to earnest and unremitting labors for the instruc- tion of mankind ; that our civil rights have no dependence on our religions opinions, more than our opinions in physics or geometry ; that, therefore, the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to the offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which, in common with his fellow-citizens, he has a natural right ; that it tends also to corrupt the principles of that very religion it is meant to encourage, by bribing, with a monopoly of worldly honors and emoluments, those who will externally profess and conform to it ; that though indeed these are criminal who do not withstand such tempta- tion, yet neither are those innocent who lay the bait in their way ; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opin- ion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles, on the supposition of their ill tendency, is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being of course joidge of that tendency, will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own ; that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt actions against peace and good order ; and, finally, that truth is great, and will prevail if left to herself ; that she is the proper and 094 THE NEW REPUBLIC. sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is per- mitted freely to contradict them. " Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or minis- try whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his relig- ious opinions or belief ; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities. "And though we well know that this Assembly, elected by the people for the ordinary purposes of legislation only, have no power to restrain the acts of succeeding Assemblies, constituted with the powers equal to our own, and that therefore to declare this act irrevocable, would be of no effect in law, yet we are free to declare, and do declare, that the rights hereby asserted are of the natural rights of mankind, and that if arfy act shall be hereafter passed to repeal the present or to narrow its operation, such act will be an infringement of natural right." 12 Now during this very time events were shaping and plans were being laid for the formation of a federal government for the American Union, to take the place of the helpless Confederation of States, and it is not too much to say that to James Madison, more than to any other single individual, except perhaps George Washington, is due the credit of bringing it all to a happy issue. And these contests in Virginia, by which there had been severed the illicit and corrupting connection between religion and the State, had awakened the public mind and prepared the way for the formation of a Constitution which would pledge the nation to a complete separation from all connection with religion in any way. Accordingly, the Constitution, as originally pro- posed by the convention, declared on this point that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." Yet this was not allowed by the people of the States to be enough. One of the objections that was urged oftenest and strongest 12 /d., pp. 23-26. RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION. was that it did not make the freedom of religion secure enough. In the Virginia Convention for the ratification of the Constitution, Madison said : "There is not a shadow of right in the general government to inter- meddle with religion. Its least interference with it would be a most flagrant usurpation. I can appeal to my uniform conduct on this sub- ject, that I have warmly supported religious freedom. It is better that this security should be depended upon from the general legislature, than from one particular State. A particular State might concur in one religious project." 1S In the Massachusetts Convention, there was objection made to the clause prohibiting a religious test, that " there is no provision that men in power should have any religion ; a papist or an infidel is as eligible as Christians." To this a minister replied, "No conceivable advantage to the whole will result from a test." Another said, "It would be happy for the United States if our public men were to be of those who have a good standing in the church." Again, a minis- ter replied, "Human tribunals for the consciences of men are impious encroachments upon the prerogatives of God. A religious test, as a qualification for office, would have been a great blemish." 14 And Elder Isaac Backus, the Baptist minister, whose "Church History of New England" we have quoted in this book, said : "Mr. President, I have said very little to this honorable convention ; but I now beg leave to offer a few thoughts upon some points in the Constitution proposed to us, and I shall begin with the exclusion of any religious test. Many appear to be much concerned about it ; but nothing is more evident, both in reason and the Holy Scriptures, than that relig- ion is ever a matter between God and individuals ; and, therefore, no man or men can impose any religious test without invading the essential prerog- atives of our Lord Jesus Christ. Ministers first assumed this power un- der the Christian name : and then Constantine approved of the practice 13 Id., p. 44. 14 Bancroft's " History of the Formation of the Constitution," book iv, chap, iii, par. 17. 696 THE NEW REPUBLIC. when lie 'adopted the profession of Christianity as an engine of State policy. And let the history of all nations be searched from that day to this, and it will appear that the imposing of religious tests has been the greatest engine of tyranny in the world. And I rejoice to see so many gentlemen who are now giving in their rights of conscience in this great and important matter. Some serious minds discover a concern lest if all religious test should be excluded, the Congress would hereafter establish popery, or some other tyrannical way of worship. But it is most certain that no such way of worship can be established without any religious test." 15 New York, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Virginia, and North Carolina, all proposed amendments more fully to secure religious rights. The first Congress under the Con- stitution met March 4, 1789, and in September of the same year the first Amendment was adopted, declaring that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or 4 prohibiting the free exercise thereof." And in 1797 the treaty with Tripoli was framed by an ex-Con- gregational clergyman, signed by President Washington, and approved by the Senate of the United States, declaring that ''the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." This completed the testimony of the supreme law of the land, expressive of the will of the American people that the government of the United States is, and of rigid ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT OF ALL ECCLESIASTICAL OR RELIGIOUS CONNECTION, INTERFERENCE, OR CONTROL. And the proof 18 abundant and absolutely conclusive, that it was all in- tentional, and that it was altogether out of respect for Christianity and the inalienable rights of men. Much has been said none too much of the wisdom of our fathers who set to the world this glorious example. Yet in this particular thing it would be an impeachment of their common sense to suppose they could have done other- wise. They had before them the history of the world, pagan, papal, and Protestant, from the cross of Christ to the Declaration of Independence, and, with the exception of 15 Blakely's " American State Papers," p. 45. THE CHRISTIAN IDEA. 697 the feeble example of toleration in Holland, and of religious freedom in Rhode Island, all the way it was one uninter- rupted course of suffering and torture of the innocent ; of op- pression, riot, bloodshed, and anarchy by the guilty ; and t all as the result of the alliance of religion and the State. The simplest process of deduction would teach them that it could not be altogether an experiment to try the total separation of the two, for it would be impossible for any system of government without such a union, to be worse than all so far had proved with such union. Our fathers were indeed wise, and it was that sort of wis- dom that is the most profitable and the rarest the wisdom of common sense. From all that was before them they could see that the State dominating religion and using relig- ion for State purposes, is the pagan idea of government ; that religion dominating the State and using the civil power for religious purposes, is the papal ideapf government ; that both these ideas had been followed in the history of Protest- antism ; therefore they decided to steer clear of both, and by a clear-cut and distinct separation of religion and the State, establish the government of the United States upon THE CHRISTIAN IDEA. Accordingly we can no more fittingly close this chapter than by quoting the noble tribute paid by the historian of the United States Constitution, to the principles of that grandest symbol of human government, and "most wonder- ful work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and pur- pose of man." "In the earliest States known to history, government and religion were one and indivisible. Each State had its special deity, and often these protectors, one after another, might be overthrown in battle, never to rise again. The Peloponnesian War grew out of a strife about an oracle. Rome, as it sometimes adopted into citizenship those whom it vanquished, introduced, in like manner, and with good logic for that day, the worship of their gods. 698 THE NEW REPUBLIC. "No one thought of vindicating religion for the con- science of the individual, till a voice in Judea, breaking day for the greatest epoch in the life of humanity, by establish- ing a pure, spiritual, and universal religion for all mankirid, enjoined to render to Caesar only that which is Caesar's. * The rule was upheld during the infancy of the gospel for all men. No sooner was this religion adopted by the chief of the Roman empire, than it was shorn of its character of universality, and enthralled by an unholy connection with the unholy State ; and so it continued till the new nation, the least defiled with the barren scoffings of the eighteenth century, the most general believer in Christianity of any people of that age, the chief heir of the Reformation in its purest forms, when it came to establish a government for the United States, refused to treat faith as a matter to be regulated by a corporate body, or having a headship in a monarch or a State. "Vindicating the right of individuality even in religion, and in religion above all, the new nation dared to set the example of accepting in its relations to God the principle first divinely ordained of God in Judea. It left the man- agement of temporal things to the temporal power ; but the American Constitution, in harmony with the people of the several States, withheld from the Federal government the power to invade the home of reason, the citadel of con- science, the sanctuary of the soul ; and not from indiffer- ence, but that the infinite Spirit of eternal truth might move in its freedom and purity and power. "- Bancroft. u Thus with "perfect individuality extended to conscience," the Constitution of the United States as it is, stands as the sole monument of all history representing the principle which Christ established for earthly government. And under it, in liberty, civil and religious, in enlighten- ment, and in progress, this nation has deservedly stood as the beacon light of the world, for more than a hundred years. 16 " History of the Formation of the Constitution," book v, chap, i, par. 10, 11. CHAPTER XXV. THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. IT would seem that all people in the United States would be glad of the opportunity to rejoice evermore that by its supreme law this nation was pledged to religious freedom. It would seem that everybody ought to be glad of the oppor- tunity to herald to all the world the fame of a nation under whose protection all people might dwell wholly unmolested in the full enjoyment of religious rights and the liberty to worship or not to worship according to the dictates of their own consciences. Such, however, is not the case. As religious bigotry knows no such thing as enlightenment or progress ; as eccle- siastical ambition never can be content without the power to persecute ; so from the beginning, complaint has been made against the character of the United States Constitution as it respects religion, and constant effort has been made to weaken its influence, undermine its authority, and subvert its precepts. From the very beginning, this feature of the Constitu- tion has been denounced as foolish, atheistical, the strictly national sin, and the cause of epidemics, etc., particularly by ministers of such religion as had not sufficient power of truth to support itself, and doctors of a divinity so weak and sickly that it could not protect itself, much less protect and bless its worshipers or anybody else. October 27, 1789, "The First Presbytery Eastward in Massachusetts and New Hampshire," sent to President Washington an address in which they complained because [699J 700 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. there was no "explicit acknowledgment of the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent, inserted some- where in the Magna Charta of our country." September 20, 1T93, in a sermon preached in New York City on a fast day on account of the yellow fever in Philadelphia, and entitled " Divine Judgments," Dr. John M. Mason magni- fied the "irreligious " feature of the Constitution as one of the chief causes of the calamities of which he was speaking. He solemnly observed that had " such momentous business" as forming a Constitution, been transacted by Mohamme- dans, or even the savages, they would have done it "in the name of God" or "paid some homage to the Great Spirit." Yes, that is all true enough ; and their god would have been as cruel and savage as the Mohammedan and other national gods have always been. But happily for us and all the rest of the world, the noble men who framed the Con- stitution were neither Mohammedans nor savages. They were men enlightened by the principles and precepts of Christianity, arid by a knowledge of history ; and were en- dowed with respect for the rights of men. In 1803 Samuel B. Wylie, D. D., of the University of Pennsylvania, preached a sermon in which he inquired : "Did not the framers of this instrument ... in this re- semble the fool mentioned in Ps. xiv, 1, 3, who said in his heart, ' There is no God ' 2 " In 1811 Samuel Austin, D. D., a New England Congregationalist, afterward president of the University of Vermont, preached a sermon in Worcester, Mass., in which he declared that this " capital defect " in the national Constitution "will issue inevitably in the destruc- tion" of the nation. In 1812 President Dwight of Yale College preached a sermon in me college chapel, in which he lamented the fail- ure of the Constitution to recognize a God, declaring that "we commenced our national existence, under the present system, without God." The next year he recurred to the same thing, saying that "the grossest nations and individ- THE CONSTITUTION DENOUNCED. uals, in their public acts and in their declarations, manifes- toes, proclamations, etc., always recognize the superinten- dency of a Supreme Being. Even Napoleon did it." Of course Napoleon did it. It is such characters as he that are most likely to do it ; and then, having covered himself with the hypocritical panoply, to ruin kingdoms, desolate nations, and violate every precept of morality and every principle of humanity. Yes, Napoleon did it ; and so did Charlemagne before him, and Clovis, and Justinian, and Theodosius, and Constantino, to say nothing of hundreds of the popes. But the fathers of this republic were not such as any of these, the noblest pledge of which is the character of the Constitution as it respects religion, for all of which every Christian can most reverently thank the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. In 1819, on a thanksgiving day appointed by the governor of Pennsylvania, Dr. Duffield preached a sermon at Carlisle, in which lie declared the Constitution " entirely atheistical." Other such testimonies as the foregoing might be given to a wearisome extent, but with one more these must suffice. 1 In 1859 Prof. J. H. Mcllvaine, D. D., of the College of New Jersey, known also as Princeton College, published an arti- cle in the Princeton Itevieio for October, in which he really lamented that "the practical effect" of the Constitution as it is, with respect to religion, " is the neutrality of the govern- ment with respect to all religion ; " and seemed much to be grieved "that no possible governmental influence can be con- stitutionally exerted for or against any form of religious be- lief." If only our fathers in forming the national govern- ment and making the Constitution, had created a national god and established its worship under penalties of fine, imprisonment, whipping, branding, banishment, or death, 1 The reader will find these and many others like them in the "Proceed, ings of the Fifth National Reform Convention," held in Pittsburg, February 4, 5, 1874, issued by the National Reform Association, and sold by the Christian Statesman Publishing Company, Pittsburg, Pa. 702 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. and had drawn up a national creed so that the question of orthodoxy, with all its riotous and bloody accompaniments, could have been the grand issue in every congressional or presidential election, no doubt all these distressed doctors of divinity would have been delighted. Fortunately for the country and for the human race, the noble men who estab- lished this government had in view the protection and preser- vation of the inalienable rights of all the people, rather than the clothing of religious bigots with governmental power to force upon others their false religious views. So far, however, all these criticisms and denunciations had been merely individual. Though they were strongly seconded by the legislative, judicial, and executive authori- ties in almost all the States, there was as yet no organized attack upon the Constitution, or regular war upon its prin- ciples. But in 1863 such an organization was effected and such a war was begun. In February of that year, ." A con- vention for prayer and Christian conference " was held in Xenia, Ohio, to consider in particular the state of the coun- try. It was composed of representatives of eleven different religious denominations from seven States. The convention met February 3, and on the fourth, Mr. John Alexander, . a United Presbyterian and covenanter, then of Xenia, later and now (1891) of Philadelphia, presented for the consider- ation of the Convention, a paper in which he bewailed the "human frailty and ingratitude" of the makers of the Con- stitution, and deplored the national sin of which they and all their posterity were guilty, because they had "well-nigh legis- lated God out of the government ; " and closed with the fol- lowing words : "We regard the Emancipation Proclamation of the President and his recommendation to purge the Constitution of slavery, as among the most hopeful signs of the times. . "We regard the neglect of God and his law, by omitting all acknowl- edgment of them in our Constitution, as the crowning, original sin of the nation, and slavery as one of its natural outgrowths. Therefore the most important step remains yet to be taken, to amend the Constitu- A RELIGIOUS AMENDMENT PROPOSED. 703 lion so as to acknowledge God and the authority of his law ; and the object of this paper is to suggest to this convention the propriety of con- sidering this subject, and of preparing such an amendment to the Consti- tution as they may think proper to propose in accordance with its provisions. " In order to bring the subject more definitely before the convention, we suggest the following as an outline of what seems to us to be needed in the preamble of that instrument, making it read as follows (proposed amendment in brackets) : " WE, THE PEOPLE OP THE UNITED STATES, [recognizing the being and attributes of Almighty God, the Divine Authority of the Holy Script- ures, the law of God as the paramount rule, and Jesus, the Messiah, the Saviour and Lord of all,] in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to our- selves and to our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." The convention approved the spirit and design of the pa- per, and ordered its publication. The following July 4-, "a few delegates " met in Pittsburg, issued an address to the country, and formed a plan for the calling of a National Convention, which met in Allegheny, January 27, 1864. It is reported as "an earnest, prayerful, and most encouraging meeting." It adopted a series of resolutions and a memo- rial to Congress, which latter is worth quoting, as showing the rapid growth of their designs upon the national Consti- tution. It runs as follows : " To the Honorable, the Senate and House of Representatives, in Congress assembled : "We, citizens of the United States, respectfully ask your Honorable bodies to adopt measures for amending the Constitution of the United States, so as to read in substance as follows: " 'We, the people of the United States, [humbly acknowledging Al- mighty God as the source of- all authority and power in civil government, the Lord Jesus Christ as the Ruler among the nations, and his revealed will as the supreme law of the laud, in order to constitute a Christian govern- ment], and in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the gen- eral welfare, [and secure the inalienable rights and the blessings of life. 704 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to ourselves, our posterity, and all the people,] do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America, " 'And further : that such changes with respect to the oath of office, slavery, and all other matters, should be introduced into the body of the Constitution, as may be necessary to give effect to these amendments in the preamble. And we, your humble petitioners, will ever pray,'" etc. "Resolved, That a special committee be appointed to carry the Me- morial to Washington, lay it before the President, and endeavor to get a special message to Congress on the subject, and to lay said Memorial be- fore Congress." The Prof. J. H. Me Ilvaine,' D. D., LL. D., before re- ferred to, was made chairman of this special committee ; and, as may well be supposed, was a diligent agent in this par- ticular office, as well as an earnest worker for the bad cause, till the day of his death. At this Allegheny meeting a permanent organization was effected, called "The National Association to Secure the Re- ligious Amendment of the Constitution of the United States," with Mr. John Alexander as the first president, and Zadok Street, a Quaker, as vice-president. 2 It is not necessary to trace the particulars of the thing any farther ; suffice it to say that a national convention has been held each year since in the principal eastern cities Pittsburg, New York, Philadelphia, Washington, and as far west as Cincinnati. The official organ of the Association is the Christian Statesman, established in 1867, and published in Pittsburg, Pa. In the latest official manual of the associ- ation 1894 we find that the president is Hon. Felix R. Brniiot, of Pittsburg, who has held the office since 1869 ; that there are one hundred and twenty-five vice-presidents, from thirty States, the District of Columbia, and Utah, among whom are eleven bishops, twelve college presidents and three ex-college presidents, eleven college professors, four ex-gov- 2 In lending his name and influence to this Association, Mr. Street seems to have forgotten the experiences of his denominational ancestors In New England under a government with which that which is now proposed by this Association is identical. THE NATIONAL REFORM ASSOCIATION. 705 ernors, three editors, Drinkhouse of the Methodist-Protes- tant, Baltimore ; Fitzgerald of the Christian Advocate, Nash- ville; 3 and Howard of .the Cumberland Presbyterian, Nash- ville, and such a store of Reverends, D. D.'s, LL. D.'s and Rev. D. D.'s and Rev. D. D. LL. D.'s, that we cannot take the time or space to designate them ; though it may not be amiss to mention such well-known names as Joseph Cook of Boston ; President Seelye of Amherst, Dr. T. L. Cuyler of Brooklyn, and Herrick Johnson of Chicago. Besides all these, there is an executive committee of eighteen, and seven district secretaries. Article II of the constitution of the as- sociation reads as follows : " The object of this society shall be to maintain existing Christian features in the American government ; to promote needed reforms in the action of the government touching the Sabbath, the institution of the family, the religious element in education, the oath, and public moral- ity as affected by the liquor traffic and other kindred evils ; and to se- cure such an amendment to the Constitution of the United States as will declare the nation's allegiance to Jesus Christ, and its acceptance of the moral laws of the Christian religion, and so indicate that this is a Christian nation, and place all the Christian laws, institutions, and usages of our government on an undeniable legal basis in the fundamen- tal law of the land." Now it is evident that were these principles adopted as the legal basis of the government, none but professed Chris- tians could hold any office or place of trust under the gov- ernment. And it is just as certainly evident that the conse- quence would be that every political hack, every demagogue, every unprincipled politician, in the United States would be- come a professed Christian ; and every popular religious body would be joined by a horde of hypocrites. But instead of trembling at such a prospect, the National Reformers act- ually rejoice at it. In the National Reform Convention held at Cincinnati, January 31 to February 1, 1872, "Rev." 3 Dr. Fitzgerald -has also been made a bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church South. This makes the number of bishop vice-presidents twelve. 706 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. T. P. Stevenson, corresponding secretary of the Association and editor of the Christian Statesman, delivered an address in which he said : "The acknowledgment, in the terms of the proposed Amendment or any similar terms, of the revealed will of God as of supreme author- ity, would make the law I have quoted from the Bible [Ex. xviii, 21], supreme law in this land, and candidates and constituencies would gov- ern themselves accordingly. If it be objected that men would become hypocrites to obtain office, we can only say that the hypocrisy which ab- stains from blasphemy and licentiousness, and conforms the outward life to the morality of the Christian religion, is a species of hypocrisy which we are exceedingly anxious to cultivate, and which all our laws restraining immorality are adapted and intended to produce." And in the Christian Statesman, of November 1, 1883, "Ilev." "W. J. Coleman, one of the principal exponents of the National Reform religion, replied to some questions that had been put by a correspondent who signed himself "Truth Seeker." We copy the following : " What effect would the adoption of the Christian Amendment, to- gether with the proposed changes in the Constitution, have upon those who deny that God is the Sovereign, Christ the Ruler, and the Bible the law? This brings up the conscience question at once. . . . The classes who would object are, as 'Trulh Seeker' has said, Jews, infidels, atheists, and others. These classes are perfectly satisfied with the Constitution as it is. How would they stand toward it if it recognized the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ ? To be perfectly plain, I believe that the exist- ence of a Christian Constitution would disfranchise every logically con- sistent infidel." 3 Notice, it is only the logically consistent dissenter that would be disfranchised. By the same token, then, the log- ically z'^consistent could all be citizens. That is, the man of honest intention, of firm conviction, and of real principle, who valued his principles more than he did political prefer- ment, would be disfranchised ; while the time-servers, the men of no convictions and of no principle, could all be acceptable citizens. In other words, the honest man, if he be a dissenter, could not be a citizen ; but every hypocrite 3 Dr. Me Allister also before U. S. Senate Committee, March 6, 1894. PROPOSED NATIONAL HYPOCRISY. 7Q7 could be a citizen. Therefore the inevitable result of the National Reform theory and purpose is to put a premium upon hypocrisy. 4 And through it the professed Christian churches of the country would become, in fact, that which the Revelation has shown in prophecy, "the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird." Rev. xviii, 2. The word of God says, "Whatsoever is not of faith is sin." Rom. xiv, 23. Even the voluntary doing of any duty toward God, without faith, is sin ; and to compel men^ to do it is nothing else than to compel them to commit sin. More than this, to proffer obedience to God, from interested motives, is sin and hypocrisy. Now the National Reform scheme proposes to offer political inducements to men to proffer obedience to God. The National Reform scheme does propose to have every member of 'the State prof- fer* service to God, and conform to religious observances, from none other than interested motives. For men to tender obedience or homage to God, while they have no love for him in their hearts, is both to dishonor him and to do violence to their own nature. And to bribe or compel men to do this very thing, is the direct aim of the National Reform Associ- ation. Its success therefore would so increase hypocrisy and multiply sin, under the cloak of godliness, that national ruin would as certainly follow as it did the same system practiced upon the Roman empire. From the proposition made in the memorial to Congress to change the body of the Constitution so as to fit their proposed preamble it will be seen that if their purpose could be made effective, there would not be left enough of the Constitution as it now is to be of any use to anybody. According to their purpose, the Bible, as the revealed will of Christ who is to be made the Ruler, is to be the supreme law. That in effect, then, would become the Constitution. Then this supreme law would necessarily need to be authori- tatively interpreted. They are all ready for this, however. 4 See pages 297, 298 of this book. 53 708 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. They have the whole scheme completed. They know that the changes which they propose, mean much : but above all things else that they intend that these changes shall bring about, is the putting of the clergy in the place of the su- preme interpreter of the new supreme law of the land. In the Christian Statesman of February 21, 1884, one of their leaders, the "Rev." J. C. K. Milligan, announced the fol- lowing program : " The changes will come gradually, and probably only after the whole frame-work of Bible legislation has been thoroughly canvassed by Con- gress and State legislatures, by the Supreme Courts of the United States and of the several States, and by lawyers and citizens generally ; an out- pouring of the Spirit might soon secure it. The churches and the pul- pits have much to do with shaping and forming opinions on all moral questions, and with interpretations of Scripture on moral and civil, as well as on theological and ecclesiastical points ; and it is probable that in the almost universal gathering of our citizens about these, the chief discus- sions and the final decision of most points will be developed there. ' Many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mount- ain of the Lord, and to the house of the God of Jacob ; and he will teach, us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths ; for the law shall go forth of Zion.' There certainly is no class of citizens more intelli- gent, patriotic, and trustworthy than the leaders and teachers in our churches." This passage, the expressions of which might easily be paralleled to any extent from the columns of the Christian Statesman, simply puts in condensed form the plans and ul- timate aims of the National Reform Association. And by it, it is seen at once that it is a revival of the original scheme of John Calvin, and is the very image of the papal scheme of the fourth century. Compare with this, pages 4-88-490 of this book. Ac- cording to this National Reform scheme, it is intended once more to destroy all distinction between moral and civil af- fairs. Once more all things pertaining to the government are to be made moral, with the clergy in the place of interpret- ers on all points. THE TWO "SPHERES." 709 Yet, like those who made the papacy m the first place, they theorize learnedly about the two distinct " spheres " of the State and the Church. 7 According to the theory, the State is in itself a moral person distinct from the people, having an individuality and a responsibility to God, of its own. And in its sphere it must be religious and serve God, and cause all the people to do likewise in its own way, and apply the moral law to itself and everybody else. On the other hand, the Church in her sphere must be religious and serve God, and cause all the people to do likewise in her own way, and interpret the Scriptures for herself and the State, and everybody else. "The evangelist is a minister of God to preach, and the magistrate is a minister of God to rule;" yet both are ministers in the mine field the field of morals with this important difference, however, the State is to '"apply" the standard of morals the Scriptures as interpreted hy the Church. As defined by themselves, it is expressed in the following passage from a speech by I). McAllister, 13. D., in the Washington, J). C., National Reform convention, April 1-3, 1890. He said : "Now what does the National Reform Association say? It says, 'Let the church do its duty in her own line. Let the line of demarca- tion be drawn here ; let the functions of the State go with the State with civil government, God's own ordinance. Let the church hold the moral principles of God's law, the law of Jesus Christ, the only perfect law, and let the Slate apply those moral principles that pertain to its own sphere of justice and right, in her schools and everywhere clue, and do her own work as she shall answer to God himself, as she is the creature of his ordaining.'" [Applause.] It is yet more fully expressed in a speech by "Rev." T. H. Tatlow in a convention at Sedalia, Mo., May 23, 24, 1889, as follows : - "To these crafty and carnal assumptions, the spiritual man, firm in Christian principle and the integrity of his convictions, replies , God's jurisdiction over man is before and above all others ; and is wisely adapted toman's entire existence in all its diversified relationships, both as spirit- 7 l'a) The ten commandments, as ex- pressive of the whole duty of man to God, are likewise composed of two parts the spiritual and the secular ; ( that, and recognize God in our Constitution. And I see in this reform a providence teaching us the necessity of recognizing some- thing else besides the will of the people as the basis of government." And at the Chautauqua (N. Y.) Assembly in August fol- lowing, Col. Elliot F. Shepard, speaking as president of the American Sabbath Union, said : "Governments do not derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. God is the only law-giver. His laws are made clear and plain in his word, so that all nations may know what are the laws which God ordained to be kept." Having so clearly shown both in their principles and in their own plain words, that their purpose is entirely to sub- vert the principles of the government of the United States and undo the nation ; it is evident that there was but one more step that could be taken in the apostasy, and that was to secure AN ALLIANCE WITH THE PAPACY ITSELF. And even this has been done. 19 The gentleman cannot have made this so very much of a study after all, or he would have known that Jefferson was not in this country at that time, and had nothing to do with the framing of the Constitution. Yet even though he had, it would only have been to his everlasting honor, and would have been no reflection on that document. CHAPTER XXVI. THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. THE fourth and in every sense of the word the most im- portant ally that the National Reform combination was en- abled to secure was and is THE PAPACY. As we have seen, the National Reform principles are papal principles from beginning to end, and it was only the logic of the situation that a positive union should finally be formed with the papacy. All that was necessary was to find something upon which the two parties could meet and firmly stand together, and then have the National Reform combination obtain a standing at which it would be to the interests of the papacy to recognize it. Consistently enough, this basis of agreement, this bond of union in fact, was found in the chief institution of the papacy the Sunday, and in the demand for the national recognition of the " Christian " religion in the enactment and enforcement of a national law requiring the recognition and observance of this sign of papal authority. As early as 1881, the National Reformers struck this note. In that year, August 31, one of its leading repre- sentatives published in the Christian Statesman the follow- ing pleading bid for the papal favor : "This common interest ['of all religious people in the Sabbath' Sunday] ought both to strengthen our determination to work, and our readiness to co-operate in every way with our Roman Catholic fellow- citizens. We may be subjected to some rebuffs in our first proffers, and the time has not yet come when the Roman Church will consent to strike hands with other churches as such ; but the time has come to make [729] 730 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY.- CONCLUDED. repeated advances, and gladly to accept co-operation in any form in which they may be willing to exhibit it. It is one of the necessities of the situation." In 1881, however, the National Reform movement did not possess sufficient influence to make it much of an item in the estimation of the papacy, and no definite response was made to this proffer to accept rebuffs at her hands, especially as it was openly announced that they were prepared to make repeated advances, and submit to repeated rebuffs. Rome therefore bided her time. She knew as well as they that "it is one of the necessities of the situation."" She knew full well that without her consent they never could secure the religious legislation which they wanted, and she was de- termined, here as ever, to have all the tokens of surrender come from them. The author of this book personally knows a gentleman who, riding on a railroad in California in 1886, fell into conversation with a Catholic priest, and finally said to him, " What is your church going to do with the religious amendment movement ? are you going to help it forward? are you going to vote for it?" " Oh, "said the priest, "we have nothing to do with that. We leave that to the Protestants ; we will let them do all that. They are coming to us, and we only have to wait." Rome therefore waited ; and as she waited, the National Reform movement rapidly grew in influence, especially by its alliances. And as it grew, it continued to bid for papal recognition. The Christian Statesman of December 11, 1884, said : - "Whenever they [the Roman Catholics] are willing to co-operate in resisting the progress of political atheism, we will gladly join hands with them." And almost as though it was in response to this in his Encyclical of 1885, Pope Leo XIII addressed to Catholics everywhere the following words : "We exhort all Catholics who would devote careful attention to public matters, to take an active part in all municipal affairs and elec- PAPACY IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. tions, and to further the principles of the church in all public services, meetings, and gatherings. All Catholics must make themselves felt as, active elements in daily political life in the countries where they live They must penetrate wherever possible in tlie administration of civil affairs ; must constantly use their utmost vigilance and energy to prevent the usages of liberty from going beyond the limits fixed by God's law. All Catholics should do all in their power to cause the constitutions of States, and legislation, to be modeled in the principles of the true church. Ali Catholic writers and journalists should never lose for an instant from view, the above prescriptions. All Catholics should redouble their submission to authority, and unite their whole heart, soul, and body, and mind, in the defense of the church." As the pope thus definitely instructed all Catholics to do precisely what the National Reform combination was already doing, this was a good sign that the desired "joining of hands " was not far off. And at a National Reform confer- ence not convention of ministers of a number of differ- ent denominations, 'held at Saratoga, New York, August 14-17, 1887, another bid was made. The official report of the proceedings of the Saratoga conference gives the follow- ing : - Rev. Dr. Price of Tennessee. "I wish to ask the secretary, Has any attempt ever been made by the National Reform Association to ascertain whether a consensus, or agreement, could be reached with our Roman Catholic fellow-citizens, whereby we may unite in support of the schools, as they do in Massachusetts ? " The secretary. " I regret to say there has not. . . . But I recognize it as a wise and dutiful course on the part of all who are engaged in or who discuss the work of education, to make the effort to secure such an agreement." Dr. Price. " I wish to move that the National Reform Association be requested by this Conference to bring this matter to the attention of American educators and of Roman Catholic authorities, with a view to securing such a basis of agreement, if possible." ' The motion was seconded and adopted. 1 The Christian Statesman of May 28, 1891, gives an account of how "the Protestants and Roman Catholics united " at a recent election of the School Board of New Haven, Conn., and secured the election of men who favored the 732 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. In May, 1888, United States Senator Henry W. Blair introduced in Congress a joint resolution to amend the National Constitution so as to recognize "the Christian religion," and require the teaching of the principles of that religion in all the public schools of the country ; and also introduced a bill to enforce the observance of Sunday as "the Sabbath," "the Lord's day," "a day of religious worship," and "to secure to the whole people rest from toil during the first day of the week, their mental and moral culture, and the religious observance of the Sabbath day." As all this was in complete harmony with the instruction of the pope to all Catholics ; and was done upon the direct solicitation of the National Reform combination, it served to bring the National Reformers and the papacy so much the nearer to a positive and declared union. In November, 1888, the American Sabbath Union be- came the predominating power in the National Reform alliance, and December 1, the Field Secretary of that organ- ization personally addressed to the head of the papacy in this country Cardinal Gibbons a letter asking him to join hands with them in petitioning Congress to pass the bill for the enactment of a national law to "promote" the ob- servance of Sunday " as a day of religious worship.'' The Cardinal promptly announced himself as "most happy" to do so, in the following letter: restoration of religious exercises in the public schools of that city; and how that a committee of five, " consisting of three Protestants Ex-President Woolsey of Yale, the Rev. Dr. Harvvood, and Rev. John E. Todd and two Roman Catholics Father Fitzpatrick and Murphy were appointed to arrange a form of worship" for the schools. The result was that a responsive exercise for teachers and pupils was framed, in which the following passage was to be recited between the Lord's prayer and the " Apostles ' " Creed : Teacher "Hail, Mary, full of grace; the Lord is with thee; blessed art Ihou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus ! Children Respond. "Holy Mary, mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen." X NATIONAL REFORM "PETITIONING." 733 " CARDINAL'S RESIDENCE, 408 N. CHARLES STREET, "BALTIMORE, December 4, 1888. " REV. DEAR SIR : I have to acknowledge your esteemed favor of the 1st instant in reference to the proposed passage of a law by Congress 'against Sunday work in the government's mail and military service,' etc. " I am most happy to add my name to those of the millions of others who are laudably contending against the violation of the Christian Sab- bath by unnecessary labor, and who are endeavoring to promote its decent and proper observance by legitimate legislation. As the late Plenary Council of Baltimore has declared, the due observance of the Lord's day contributes immeasurably to the restriction of vice and immorality, and to the promotion of peace, religion, and social order, and cannot fail to draw upon the nation the blessing and protection of an overruling Provi- dence. If benevolence to the beasts of burden directed one day's rest in every week under the old law, surely humanity to man ought to dictate the same measure of rest under the new law. "Your obedient servant in Christ, "JAMES CARDINAL GIBBONS, ' 'Archbishop of Baltimore. " a And although in this particular instance the Cardinal spoke only for himself, the anxious zeal of those professed Protestants to secure an alliance with the papacy, hurried them into counting every Catholic man, woman, and child in the United States, under the census of 1880, as having actually signed the petition. This was done at the conven- tion of the National Reform allies, held in Washington, D. C., under the auspices of the American Sabbath Union, December 11-13, 1888. In the announcements of the conven- tion it had. been stated that the church in which the con- vention was to meet would be festooned with the names of six million petitioners ; but at the very beginning of the first meeting, it was stated that there were fourteen million of them. A question was sent up asking how the number conld have grown so much larger so suddenly. Mrs. Bate- ham was recalled to the platform to answer the question, and when she answered it, the cause of such a sudden and 2 Senate Hearing on "Sunday Bill," page 18. 734 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. enormous growth was explained by the fact that Cardinal Gibbons had written the above letter saying he was most happy to add his name to the others, and solely upon the strength of his name, seven million two hundred thousand Catholics were counted as petitioners. Thus matters stood for about one year, until Novem- ber 12, 1889, when the "Congress of Catholic Laymen of the United States '' was' held in Baltimore "to celebrate the one hundredth anniversary of the establishment of the American hierarchy. " In that congress there was a paper read by Mr. Manly B. Tello, editor of the Catholic Universe, of Cleveland, Ohio, in which it was said : " What we should 'seek is an en rapport with the Protestant Chris- tians who desire to keep Sunday holy. . . . We can bring the Protestant masses over to the reverent moderation of the Catholic Sunday." And the platform which was adopted as the result of the discussions in the congress, declared upon this point as fol- lows : " There are many Christian issues to which Catholics could come to- gether with non-Catholics, and shape civil legislation for the public weal. In spite of rebuff and injustice and overlooking zealotry, we should seek alliance with non-Catholics for proper Sunday observance. Without going over to the Judaic Sabbath, we can bring the masses over to the moderation of the Christian Sunday." This was one of the "planks" of the platform which was "received with the greatest demonstrations ;" and the whole platform was adopted "without discussion" and "without a dissenting voice." As all the papers that were read in the congress, as well as the platform, had to pass the inspection of the hierarchy before they were presented in public, these statements are simply the expression of the papacy in official response to the overtures which the so- called Protestant theocrats had been so long making to the papacy. As was only to be expected, it was received by THE BOND OF UNION. 735 them with much satisfaction. The American Sabbath Union joyously exclaimed : "The National Lay Congress of Roman Catholics, after correspond- ence and conference with the American Sabbath Union, passed its famous resolution in favor of co-operation with Protestants in Sabbath reform. . . . This does not mean that the millennium is to be built in a day. This is only a proposal of courtship ; and the parties thus far have approached each other shyly." And in a temperance (?) speech in a temperance conven- tion in New York City, reported in the National Temperance Advocate, for May, 1889, Archbishop Ireland thanked God that "Protestants and Catholics" "stand together in de- manding the faithful observance of Sunday." When a union so long desired as this had been, has reached the stage of courtship, actual marriage could not be very far off. Yes, that marriage was certainly coming, and like every other feature of the papacy, it is contrary to nature one woman (church) marrying another in order that both might more readily form an adulterous connection with the State. And the fruit of the confused relationship will be just that which is pictured in the Scripture a hideous non- descript monster, breathing out persecution and death. Kev. xiii. 11-17. Thus are the leaders of professed Protestantism in the United States joined heart and hand with the papacy, with the sole purpose of creating in this government an order of things identical with that which created the papacy at the first. It is most appropriate, therefore, that the bond of union which unites them in the evil work, should be the very thing the day of the sun by means of which the papacy at first secured control of the civil power to compel those who did not belong to the church to submit to the dic- tates of the church, and to act as though they did belong to it. It was by means of Sunday laws that the church secured con- trol of the civil power for the furtherance of her ends when the papacy was made. It is appropriate that the same iden- 736 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. tical means should be employed by an apostate Protestantism to secure control of the civil power for the furtherance of her ends, and to compel those who do not belong to the church to submit to the dictates of the church, and to act as those do who do belong to the church. And as that evil intrigue back there made the papacy, so will this same thing here make the living image of the papacy. Two things that are so alike in the making will as surely be as much alike when they are made. What Home means by the transaction is shown by a let- ter from Cardinal Gibbons upon the subject of the authority for Sunday observance, written but a little while before the " Congress of Catholic Laymen" was held. The letter was written to Mr. E. E. Franke, then of Pittsburg, now of Jersey City, N. J. , and is as follows : " CARDINAL'S RESIDENCE, ) "408 NORTH CHARLES ST., BALTIMORE, MD., > "October 3, 1889. \ "DEAR MR. FRANKE : At the request of His Eminence, the Cardinal, I write to assure you that you are correct in your assertion that Protest- ants in observing the Sunday are following not the Bible, which they take as their only rule of action, but the tradition of the church. I defy them to point out to me the word 'Sunday' in the Bible ; if it is not to be found there, and it cannot be, then it is not the Bible which they follow in this particular instance, but tradition, and in this they flatly contradict themselves. "The Catholic Church changed the day of rest from the last to the first day of the week, because the most memorable of Christ's works was accomplished on Sunday. It is needless for me to enter into any elabor- ate proof of the matter. They cannot prove their point from Scripture ; therefore, if sincere, they must acknowledge that they draw their observ- ance of the Sunday from tradition, and are therefore weekly contradict- ing themselves. Yours very sincerely, " M. A. REARDON." This shows that it is as a Roman Catholic, securing honor to an institution of the papacy, and thus to the papacy itself, that Cardinal Gibbons indorses the national Sunday- law movement ; and that it is as Roman Catholics doing the same thing, that the laity and the hierarchy of the Catholic THE AUTHORITY FOR SUNDAY OBSERVANCE. 737 Church in the United States have accepted the proffer of the professed Protestant combination for political purposes, and have joined hands with this combination in its aims upon the institutions of the country. The Cardinal understands what he is doing a great deal better than the associations for religious legislation under- stand what they are doing. And further, the Cardinal un- derstands what they are doing a great deal better than they themselves do. His letter also shows that those who signed the petition for a Sunday law, as the Cardinal did, were hon- oring the papacy, as the Cardinal does. What Kome means in this may be seen not only by this letter, but by the history of the original movement as given in Chapter XIII of this book. The Cardinal and the rest of the hierarchy know just how the original movement worked and accomplished what it did. All these facts are familiar to them, and they are glad to see this perfect pattern of the original so strongly supported and so persistently urged. They are indeed glad to join hands with it, and to be married to it, for it is in spirit and in truth only a part of that of which they themselves are a part. And these organizations that are so determined to have Sunday laws, know as. well as Cardinal Gibbons does that there is no authority in the Scripture for Sunday observance. They know as well as he does that there is no other basis for it than tradition, and no other authority for it than the authority of "the Church." The American Sabbath Union has issued a series of "Pearl of Days Leaflets," No. 3 of which was written by "Kev." George S. Mott, a vice- president of the Union, and is entitled "Saturday or Sunday Which?" In this leaflet, page 7, are the follow- ing words : " Our opponents declare, 'We are not satisfied with these inferences and suppositions ; show us where the first day is spoken of as holy, or as being observed instead of the seventh ; we must have a direct and posi- tive command of God.' We admit there is no such command." 55 738 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. The Woman's Christian Temperance Union likewise oc- cupies the same position. Leaflet No. 3, of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, department of Sabbath ob- servance, is a concert exercise on the fourth commandment for Sunday- schools and ''Bands of Hope." From this leaflet we copy the following : "Questions, Why do we not still keep the seventh day for our Sabbath, instead of the first, or Sunday ? "Answer. We still keep one day of rest after six of work, thus imitating God's example at creation, and at the same time we honor and keep in memory the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who on the first day of the week rose from the dead, and thus completed our redemption. " Question 6. If Jesus wished the day changed, why did he not command it ? " Answer. A command to celebrate the resurrection could not wisely be made before the resurrection occurred. He probably gave his own disciples such directions afterward when 'speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.' " In 1885 the American Sunday-school Union issued a one- thousand-dollar prize essay on the Sunday question, written by " Rev.'' A. E. Waffle, who is now an ardent worker for Sunday laws. In this essay (pp. 186, 187) he plainly says : "Up to the time of Christ's death no change had been made in the day." And "So far as the record shows, they [the apostles] did not, however, give any explicit command enjoining the abandonment of the seventh-day Sabbath, and its observance on the first day of the week." The American Sabbath Union leaflet above referred to, corresponds to this precisely, in that it says (page 5) that the observance of the first day of the week "grew up spontaneously in the apostolic age, and out of the heart of believers, and so became the Sabbath of the Christian era." And this, with a number of other things, is said by the same* document (pp. 6, 7) to "furnish a reliable presumption that, during those years following the resurrection, the first day of the week was observed in a religious way. " HOW SUNDAY CAME IN. 739 And Dr. Herrick Johnson, speaking for the whole religio- political combination, before the United States Senate Com- mittee, December 13, 1888, confirmed these statements in the following words : Mr. Johnson. " I think that no one who accepts the Bible doubts that there is one day in seven to be observed as a day of rest. " The Chairman. " Will you just state the authority ? " Mr. Johnson. "Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. . . . Six days shall thou labor and do all thy work." The Chairman. "Is there any other ? " Mr. Johnson. "There are references to this law all through the Bible." The Chairman. "Now you come and change that Sabbath day to which the Lord refers." Mr. Johnson. "That we hold was changed by the Lord himself." The Chairman. " When did he do that, and by what language ?" Mr. Johnson. "There was a meeting for worship on the first day of the week, the day the Lord arose, and seven days after 3 there was another meeting for the same purpose, and it is referred to as the Lord's day." The Chairman. " After the change ?" Mr. Johnson. "Yes, sir ; after the change." The Chairman. "It is based then upon two or three days' being observed as days of religious worship after the resurrection ? " Mr. Johnson. " Yes, sir." Such, according to the official declarations of these organizations, is the origin and basis of Sunday observance. And as to the authority for it, they are equally explicit. "Rev." George Elliot, pastor, 1888-1890, of the Foundry Methodist Episcopal Church, Washington, D. C., is a repre- sentative of the movement. He appeared twice before congressional committees as such representative. In 1884, he wrote an essay on the Sunday question, which took a prize of five hundred dollars. The essay, entitled, "The Abiding Sabbath," is issued by the American Tract Society, and is recommended everywhere by the Woman's Christian Temper- ance Union. In this book (p. 184), is the following state- ment : 3 There Is no such statement in the Bible. 740 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. "It is not difficult to account for the complete silence of the New Testa- ment so far as any explicit command for the Sabbath or definite rules for its observance are concerned. . . . The conditions under which the early Chiristian church existed were not favorable for their announcement. The early church, a struggling minority composed of the poorest people, could not have instituted the Christian Sabbath in its full force of meaning. The ruling influences of government and society were against them." And how the ruling influences of government and society were turned in favor of the Sunday, so that it could be and was instituted in its full force of meaning, the following extracts from pages 213 and 228 of the same book plainly show : "For the perfect establishment of the Christian Sabbath, as has already been observed, there was needed a social revolution in the Roman empire. The infant church, in its struggle through persecution and martyrdom, had not the poicer even to keep the Lord's day perfectly itself, much less could the sanctity of the day be guarded from desecra- tion by unbelievers. We should expect, therefore, to find the institution making a deepening groove on society and in history, and becoming a well-defined ordinance the very moment that Christianity became a domi- nant power. That such was the case, the facts fully confirm. From the records of the early church and the works of the Christian Fathers, we can clearly see the growth of 'the institution culminating in the famous edict of Constantine, when Christianity became the established religion of the empire. "The emperor Constantine was converted, and Christianity became, practically, the religion of the empire. It was now possible to enforce the Christian, Sabbath, and make its observance universal'. In the year 321, consequently, was issued the famous edict of Constantine, commanding abstinence from servile. labor on Sunday." As to the origin and growth of Sunday observance, and its culmination in the famous Edict of Constantine, these statements are strictly in accord witli the historical facts. And that famous edict in which the Sunday observance move- ment culminated then, was issued solely at the request of the church managers in return for services rendered, and on their part was but the culmination of their grand scheme to secure control of the civil power to compel all to submit to the dis- NO " THUS SAITH THE LORD." 7-H cipline and the dictates of the church. Therefore, by their own official and representative statements, we know that they know that Cardinal Gibbons states the exact truth when he tells them that it is the Catholic Church that has changed the day of rest from the seventh day of the week to the first, and that the original and only authority for Sunday observ- ance is the authority of the papacy. This they know, and therefore they realize that their efforts are impotent to per- suade the consciences of men in the matter of Sunday observ- ance. Mr. Elliott himself has borne conclusive testimony to this in the same book above referred to (p. 263), as follows : "To make the Lord's day only an ecclesiastical contrivance, is to give no assurance to the moral reason, and to lay no obligation upon a free conscience. The church cannot maintain this institution by its own edict. Council, assembly, convocation, and synod can impose a law on the conscience only when they are able to back their decree with ' Thus saith the Lord.' " To make Sunday observance only an ecclesiastical con- trivance is all that he or anybody else has ever been able to do. That is just what these official statements of those organizations show that they know it to be. The only edicts they are able to show for it, are the edicts of Constan- tine and his successors, who in every instance did only the bidding of the church. These are confessedly the only au- thority by which they would lay the observance of Sunday as a law upon the consciences of men. They cite no "Thus saith the Lord " for the institution, nor for its observance. On the contrary, they confess that "there is no such com- mand ; " they confess that there is no command " enjoiniig the abandonment of the seventh-day Sabbath and its observ- ance on the first day of the week ; " they confess "complete silence of the New Testament " so far as concerns any com- mand to observe Sunday, or rules as to how it should be observed; they confess that they have only "presumption," and "probability," and a "spontaneous growth out of 742 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. the hearts of believers," for its origin and basis, and the church as " a dominant power" issuing "the famous Edict of Oonstantine " for its authority. Therefore, by their own showing and upon their own confession, the observance of Sunday is of "no obligation upon a free conscience." Yet council, assembly, convocation, and synod have decreed that Sunday shall be observed by all ; and as they are not able to back their decree with a "Thus saith the Lord," they are determined now, as those others were at the first, to back it with the Thus saith the State, and lay it as an obliga- tion upon not free, but enslaved consciences, compelling men to do homage to the authority of the papacy. Yet in the face of all this testimony and ever so much more to the same effect, and in the face of the whole history of the Sunday institution, they have the effrontery to present the plea that it is only a "civil" Sunday observance that they want to enforce ! 5 They therefore pass resolutions, and adopt planks such as the following from the National Pro- hibition platform of 188T : " 10. For the preservation and defense of the Sabbath as a civil institution, without oppressing any who religiously observe the same or any other day than the first day of the week." None of those Prohibitionists, however, have attempted to explain just why, in their efforts to preserve and defend the Sabbath as a civil institution, they should refrain from oppressing only those who "religiously observe" Sunday or some other day. This betrays a lurking consciousness of the fact that such legislation is oppressive. It likewise re- veals the utter impossibility of either defining or defending such a thing as a civil Sabbath. There is no such thing as a civil Sabbath, and these organizations mean no such thing as a civil Sunday. The whole subject is religious from beginning to end. There never was a law enacted, nor a single step taken, in favor of Sunday that had not a religious 5 See pages 312-319 of this book. THAT "MISERABLE EXCUSE." purpose and intent ; and there can never be any such thing without such purpose ; for the institution is religious in itself. In this connection it will not be amiss to remember that it was altogether for "civil" reasons that Roger Williams was banished, that the Baptists and the Quakers were dealt with as they were by the New England theocracy ; and that it was for the good of the State and to preserve the State, that is, for "civil" reasons, that the emperor Justin com- pelled all to be Catholics, and that the alliance was first formed with the church and such legislation enacted. 6 In the scathing words of another, this "miserable" "civil" plea is best described: "The rulers of Massachusetts put the Quakers to death, and banished the ' Antinomiaiis ' and 'Anabaptists,' not because of their religious tenets, but be- cause of their violations of the civil laws. This is the justification which they pleaded, and it was the best they could make. Miserable excuse ! ... So the defenders of the Inquisition have always spoken and written in justifica- tion of that awful and most iniquitous tribunal." aird.' t As the members of this whole combination taken singly and together are wedded to the idea of a man-made theocracy, the practical effects of the movement, if successful, would seem to be sufficiently discernible from, the examples that have been given in the papal, the Calvinistic, and the Puritan theocracies. This probability is greatly strengthened by the fact not only that it is such a perfect likeness of the papal theocracy and is joined to the papacy itself, but that 6 Pages 603, 607, and 541, of this book. 7 "Religion in America," book ii, chap, xix, par. 14, note. "This is the stale pretense of the clergy in all countries: after they have solicited the govern- ment to make penal laws against those they call heretics or schismatics, and prompted the magistrates to a vigorous execution, when they lay all the odium on the civil power; for whom they have no excuse, but that such men suffered not for religion, but for disobedience to law." Buckle, " History of Civiliza- tion," v I i, pp. 338, 339, note. 744 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. great pride is taken in appealing to the principles and prac- tices of the Puritan theocracy. It was declared in the Washington, D. C., convention, December 11-13, 1888, that the object of the movement is to make Sunday "the ideal Sabbath of the Puritans." A favorite invocation of " Kev." M. A. Gault is that it might " rain Puritanism," all the way from six weeks to three months. Dr. Herrick Johnson, in his noted philippic against the Sunday news- paper, exclaims: "Oh, for a breath of the old Puritan!" Having so explicitly ^declared their intentions in merely working for their much-desired laws, it were almost super- fluous to inquire whether there will not be persecution were it not for the singular apathy and the overweening confidence of the people generally with regard to the scheme. To ask the question, however, is on-ly to ask whether they may be expected to use the power for which they are grasping, should they succeed in their designs. And to this it would seem to be a sufficient answer, merely again to ask, If they do not intend to use the power, then why are they making such strenuous efforts to get it ? For an answer we might cite the reader to pages 714, 715 of this book. But in addition to that, this question has been asked to themselves, and they have answ r ered it. At the Lakeside, Ohio, convention, there was asked the following question : " Will not the National Reform movement result in persecution against those who on some points believe differently from the majority, even as the recognition of the Christian religion by the Roman power resulted in grievous persecution against true Christians ? " The answer given by Dr. Me Allister is as follows : "Now notice the fallacy here. The recognition of the Roman Cath- olic religion by the State, made that State a persecuting power. Why ? Because the Roman Catholic religion is a persecuting religion. If true Christianity is a persecuting religion, then the acknowledgment of our principles by the State will make the State a persecutor. But if the true Christian religion is a religion of liberty, a religion that regards the DR. MCALLISTER AND POl'E PELAGIUS. 745 rights of all, then the acknowledgment of those principles by the State will make the State the guardian of all men, and the State will he no per- secutor. True religion never persecutes." There is indeed a fallacy here, but it is not in the ques- tion ; it is in the answer. That which made the Roman State a persecuting power, says the Doctor, was its recogni- tion of the Catholic religion, "'which is a persecuting relig- ion." But the Roman Catholic religion is not the only persecuting religion that has been in the world. Presbyte- rianism persecuted while John Calvin ruled in Geneva ; it persecuted while the Convenanters ruled in Scotland ; it per- secuted while it held the power in England. Congregation- alism persecuted while it had the power in New England. Episcopalianism persecuted in England and in Virginia. Every religion that has been allied with the civil power, or that has controlled the civil power, has been a persecuting religion ; and such will always be the case. Dr. Me Allister's implied statement is true, that "true Christianity never persecutes ; " but it is true only because true Christianity never will allow itself to be allied in any way with the civil power, or to receive any support from it. The National Reform Association does propose to "enforce upon all, the laws of Christian morality ; " it proposes to have the government adopt the National Reform religion, and then "lay its hand upon any religion that does not con- form to it ; " and it asserts that the civil power has the right " to command the consciences of men." The whole Sunday- law movement does propose to enforce the observance of the Christian Sabbath, or the Lord's day. Now any such thing carried into effect, as is here plainly proposed by the Asso- ciations, can never be anything else than persecution. But Dr. McAllister affirms that the National Reform movement, if successful, would not lead to persecution, "because true religion never persecutes." The Doctor's argument amounts only to this : The National Reform re- ligion is the true religion. True religion never persecutes. Therefore to compel men to conform to the true religion, 746 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. that is, the religion that controls the civil power, is not persecution. In A. D. 556, Pope Pelagius called upon Narses to com- pel certain parties to obey the pope's command. Narses re- fused, on the ground that it would be persecution. The pope answered Narses's objection with this argument : " Be not alarmed at the idle talk of some, crying out against persecu- tion, and reproaching the church, as if she delighted in cruelty, when she punishes evil with wholesome severities, or procures the salvation of souls. He alone, persecutes who forces to evil. But to restrain men from doing evil, or to punish those who have done it, is not persecution, or cruelty, but love of mankind." 8 Compare this with Dr. Me Allister's answer, and find any difference in principle between them who can. There is no difference. The arguments are identical. It is the essential spirit of the papacy which is displayed in both, and in that of Pope Pelagius no more than in that of Dr. Me Allister ; and he spoke for the whole National Reform combination when he said it. Another question, in the form of a statement, at the same time and place was this : "There is a law in the State of Arkansas enforcing Sunday observ. ance upon the people, and the result has been that many good persons have not only been imprisoned, but have lost their property, and even their lives." To which Dr. Me Allister coolly replied : "It is better that a few should suffer, than that the whole nation should lose its Sabbath." This argument is identical with that by which the Phari- sees in Christ's day justified themselves in killing him. It was said : " It is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not." John xi, 50. And then says the record: "Then from that day 8 Bower's " History of the Popes," Pelagius, par. 6. THEY DO PERSECUTE. forth they took counsel together for to put him to death." Verse 53. The argument used in support of the claim of right to use this power, is identical with that used by the papacy in in- augurating her persecutions; the argument in justification of the -use of the power, is identical with that by which the murderers of Jesus Christ justified themselves in accomplish- ing that wicked deed ; and if anybody thinks that these men in our day, proceeding upon the identical theory, in the identical way, joining themselves to the papacy, and justify- ing their proceedings by arguments identical with those of the papacy and the murderous Pharisees, if anybody thinks that these men will stop short of persecution, he has vastly more confidence than the author of this book has, in apostate preachers in possession of civil power. Nor are we left to conjecture even in this. That they are ready to persecute, and to justify their persecution, has already been abun4antly demonstrated. It may be known to the reader that there is a consider- able and constantly growing number of people in the United States known as Seventh-day Adventists, besides the denomi- nation known as Seventh-day Baptists, who exercise the right to think for themselves religiously as well as otherwise, and to believe and decide for themselves as to what the Bible requires with respect to their duty toward God. " They observe the seventh day as the Sabbath according to the plain reading of the fourth commandment, and quietly carry on their business on Sunday as on other days. These peo- ple are found in all the States and Territories of the Union, in numbers ranging from a few to several thousands in different places. And from 1885 up to the very hour in 1894 when this book went to press, in Arkansas, Tennessee, Mary- land, and Georgia in succession, and in the last three States both in succession and at once, these people have been persecuted by fines, by imprisonments, and by working in the chain-gang, for refusing to observe Sunday. 748 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. The procedure is well described in the following extract from the speech of Senator Crockett of Arkansas, in the State Senate, in behalf of the persecuted ones in that State. We cannot see how any lover of justice can fail to assent to the Senators opinion as expressed in the closing sentence. . "Let me, sir, illustrate the operation of the present law by one or two examples. A Mr. Swearingen came from a Northern State and set- tled on a farm in county. His farm was four miles from town, and far away from any house of religious worship. He was a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, and after having sacredly ob- served the Sabbath of his people (Saturday) by abstaining from all secu- lar work, he and his son, a lad of seventeen, on the first day of the week went quietly about their usual avocations, They disturbed no one interfered with the rights of no one, But they were observed, and re- ported to the Grand Jury, indicted, arrested, tried, convicted, fined, and having no money to pay the fine, these moral, Christian citizens of Ar- kansas were dragged to the county jail and imprisoned like felons for twenty-five days and for what ? For daring, in this so-called land of liberty, in the year of our Lord 1887, to worship God. " Was this the end of the story ? Alas, no sir ! They were turned out ; and the old man's only horse, his sole reliance to make bread for his children, was levied on to pay the fine and costs, amounting to thirty- eight dollars. The horse sold at action for twenty-seven dollars. A few days afterward the sheriff came again, and demanded thirty-six dol- lars, eleven dollars balance due on fine and costs, and twenty-five dollars for board for himself and son while in jail. And when the poor old man a Christian, mind you told him with tears that he had no money, he promptly levied on his only cow, but was persuaded to ac- cept bond, and the amount was paid by contributions from his friends of the same faith. Sir, my heart swells to bursting with indignation as I repeat to you the infamous story." Nor did the unjust proceeding stop here. The Supreme Court confirmed the judgments which sanctioned these in- iquitous proceedings, and it confirmed them under a Con- stitution which declares : "All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences ; no man can of right be compelled to attend, erect, or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent. No human authority can, in any case or manner whatsoever, control or interfere with the right of " THE GOOD SEED." conscience ; and no preference shall ever be given by tbe law to any religious establishment, denomination, or mode of worship, above any other." The Supreme Courts of Tennessee and Maryland likewise confirmed the like procedure in those States, and under constitutions containing substantially the same provisions. And even the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Tennessee confirmed it alias "due process of law" under the United States Constitution ; and plainly and in so many words justified it as persecution ! Here are the words : " If the human impulse to rest on as many days as one can have for rest from toil is not adequate, as it usually is, to secure abstention from daily vocations on Sunday, one may, and many thousands do, work on that day, without complaint from any source ; but if one ostentatiously labors for the purpose of emphasizing his distaste for, or his disbelief in, the custom, he may be made to suffer for his defiance by persecutions, if you call them so, on the part of the great majority, who will compel him to rest when they rest." 9 It is by no means certain that the strict Sunday observers of these States are any worse than would be those of any other State, in like circumstances. A very strong sug- gestion in this direction is the fact, that although accounts of these persecutions are not only a matter of public record in the proceedings of courts and legislatures, but were pub- lished and denounced by the secular papers throughout the country, and too by such papers as the World and the Sun of New York City ; the Inter Ocean, the Tribune, and oth- ers of Chicago ; the Globe-Democrat and the Republic,^ St. Louis ; and the Boston Magazine, the Arena ; yet not a half-dozen religious papers in all the land ever spoke a word against it. 9 This decision and tbe practice which -called it out, the New York Inde- pendent, August 6, 1891, fitly described as "bad law, bad morals, and bad re- ligion." The decision does in fact justify all persecution from that of Jesus Christ, to this case at bar. 750 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. True, the National Keforra papers mentioned it, but only to apologize for it or to justify it. And as a matter of course, the National Reform leaders as well as papers, have justified it all. The Christian Statesman of June 4, 1891, in its leading editorial, stirring up the people of Michigan to sow " the good seed" of Sunday-law enforcement, referred to these persecutions, and soothingly remarked that "these instances have occurred in three States only," and that then only one person " ever died from such a cause." And as for the decisions of the Supreme Courts which we have named, they have abundant precedent in the decis- ions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and others of the original thirteen States, which have perpetuated the colonial Sunday legislation, which was copied from the British system, which was derived directly from the papal system, and which in turn has been copied in the legislation, and perpetuated by the decisions, of the Supreme Courts of all the younger States of the Union- And now, instead of following the splendid example of California and lifting the legislation of the States up to the level of the national principles, the great effort is, and the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee at least has fully endorsed the effort, to bring down the national principles and procedure to the level of those of the States, and so to turn this nation into the Romish tide, and commit it to papal principles, to the sup- port of papal institutions, and to the enforcement of the chief of all papal observances. Religious bigotry is ever the same everywhere. And the movement to secure the enactment of National Sunday laws is simply an attempt to spread over the whole nation the same wicked persecutions that have appeared in these lo- calities. And this is but the preliminary step to the crushing out of all freedom of religious thought and action. For, by what right, or upon what authority, do they presume to do this? We have seen that by their own plain statements they con- INALIENABLE RIGHT. 751 fess that there is no command of God for Sunday observ- ance. Yet they propose to compel all in the nation to keep Sunday as an obligation to God. By what right, then, does this great combination demand State and national laws com- pelling people to observe, as an obligation to God, that for which there is no command of God ? Where there is no command of God, there is no obliga- tion toward God. In this demand, therefore, they do in fact put themselves in the place of God, and require that their will shall be accepted as the will of God. They re- quire that their views, without any command from the Lord, shall be enforced upon all men ; and that all men shall be required to yield obedience thereto as to an obligation en- joined by the Lord. Now it is the inalienable right of every man to dissent from any and every church doctrine, and to disregard every church ordinance, institution, or rite. All but papists will admit this. Therefore, whenever the State undertakes to enforce the observance of any church ordinance or institu- tion, and thus makes itself the champion of the Church, it simply undertakes to rob men of their inalienable right to think and choose for themselves in matters of religion and church order. Men are therefore, and thereby, compelled either to submit to be robbed of their inalienable right of freedom of thought in religious things, or else to disregard the authority of the State. And the man of sound principle and honest conviction will never hesitate as to which of the two things he will do. When the State undertakes to enforce the observance of church ordinances or institutions, and thus makes itself the champion and partisan of the church, then the inalienable right of men to dissent from CHUKCH doctrines and to disre- gard church ordinances or institutions, is extended to the authority of the STATE in so far as it is thus exercised. And that which is true of church doctrines, ordinances, and insti- tutions, is equally true of religious doctrines and exercises of all kinds. 752 THE GREAT CONSPIRACY. CONCLUDED. Now Sunday is, and is acknowledged even by them- selves to be, but a church institution only. And when the State enforces Sunday observance, it does compel submis- sion to church authority, and conformity to church discipline; and does thereby invade the inalienable right of dissent from church authority and discipline. If the State can rightfully do this in this one thing, it can do so in all ; and therefore in doing this it does in effect destroy all freedom of religious thought and action. 10 Yet strictly speaking, it is not their own will nor their own views which they propose to have enforced. Protest- ants did not create the Sunday institution ; they did not originate Sunday observance. Protestantism inherited both the Sunday institution and Sunday observance. The Catho- lic Church originated Sunday observance. The papacy sub- stituted the Sunday institution for the Sabbath of the Lord, enforced its acceptance and observance upon all, and prohib- ited under a curse the keeping of the Sabbath of the Lord. She did it and justified herself in it, precisely as these now do. That is, by tradition and "presumptions" and "spon- taneous growths from the hearts of believers," and by what Christ "probably" taught, or intended to teach, or would have taught if the matter had only been brought to his attention. . There is authority for Sunday observance. It is the authority of the Catholic Church. Therefore, whoever ob- serves Sunday, does recognize the authority of the papacy, and does do homage to the Catholic Church. The enact- ment of Sunday laws does recognize the authority of the Catholic Church ; the enforcement of Sunday observance does compel homage and obedience to the papacy. Just what there is in this movement, therefore, is the literal ful- fillment of that prophecy in Revelation xiii, 11-17. It is the making of the image of the papal beast ; and the enforce- ment of THE WORSHIP OF THE BEAST AND HIS IMAGE. 10 See page 688, par. 2, 3, of this book. CHAPTER XXVII. THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. first edition of this book was finished and went to JL press in August, 1891. In this chapter in that edition, the author discussed the probabilities that The Great Con- spiracy would succeed. At that time we pointed out and discussed at large the encroachments by which, in violation of every principle of the Constitution, the religious power had been enabled to fasten itself upon the government to such an extent that it was confessedly " impossible " to shake it off; namely, Government chaplaincies, religious proclama- tions by the president, and appropriation of public money to the churches by Congress. We also exposed the organ- ized attempts which were -then being made in Congress, through the proposed amendment to the Constitution recog- nizing "the Christian religion," and the bills proposing to require the observance of Sunday by a national law. We cited the weighty words of Congress both Senate and House spoken in 1829-30 when the same question was before it, as follows : "The Jewish government was a theocracy, which enforced religious observances ; and though the committee would hope that no portion of the citizens of our country would willingly introduce a system of relig- ious coercion in our civil institutions, the example of other nations should admonish us to watch carefully against its earliest indication. . . . Among all the religious persecutions with which almost every page of modern history is stained, no victim ever suffered but for the violation of what government denominated the law of God. To prevent a similar 56 [ T53 1 754 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. train of evils in this country, the Constitution has wisely withheld from our government the power of defining the divine law. . . . "Extensive religious combinations to effect a political object, are, in the opinion of the committee, always dangerous. This first effort of the kind calls for the establishment of a principle, which, in the opinion of the committee, would lay the foundation for dangerous innovations upon the spirit of the Constitution, and upon the religious rights of the citi- zens." Knowing that extensive religious combinations to effect a political object, are indeed always dangerous ; and know- ing that here existed the most extensive religious combina- tion that it was possible to form in the United States and formed for this very purpose ; we knew that the danger from it was real. And in view of this dangerous situation as it then was, we closed the book with the following words : ' ' CONCLUSION. "The principles exemplified in the Constitution of the United States as respects religion, were first announced by Jesus Christ, and were preached to the world by his apostles and the early Christians. For two hundred and fifty years they were opposed by the Roman empire. But at last that empire was compelled to confess the justice of the principles, and so to acknowledge the victory of Christianity. " Then ambitious bishops and political ecclesiastics took advantage of a political crisis to secure control of the civil power, and in the name of Christianity to pervert the victory which Christianity had so nobly won. This created the pa- pacy, a religious despotism, and speedily wrought the ruin of the Roman empire, and proved a curse to the ages that followed. "Then came Protestantism, casting off the yoke of the papacy, and restating the principles of Christianity respect- ing religion and the State. Yet, from Martin Luther to Roger Williams, in every place and in every form, wherever it was possible, professed Protestantism, following the ex- ample of the papacy, seized upon the civil power, and used ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE CONSTITUTION. 755 it to restrict and repress tlie freedom of the mind, and to persecute those who chose to think differently from the re- ligious majority. "Thus upon a test of ages, by paganism, Catholicism, and false Protestantism, there was demonstrated to the world that any connection between religion and the State is debasing to both ; that if the religious power rises superior to the civil power, it is ruinous to the State ; and that religious and civil rights are both secure, and religion and liberty go forward together, only when religion and the State are sep- arate. And in all this there was demonstrated by every proof, the perfect wisdom and absolute justice of the divine principle enunciated by Jesus Christ, that religion and the State must be entirely separate that to Caesar there is to be rendered only that which is Caesar's, while men must be left free to render to God that which is God's, according to the dictates of the individual conscience. "In the formation of the government and in the Consti- tution of the United States, the triumph of the principles of Christianity respecting earthly government, was complete. In their completeness, and by the directing providence of God, these divine principles were thus set forth for an example to all nations. Yet instead of these principles having been maintained in their integrity as established by the fathers of the New Republic, there has been allowed or effected by those who came after, a steady encroachment, little by little, of religion upon the State. Each successive encroachment has been made, by the precedent, only a stepping stone to further encroachment, until now the demand is openly, persistently, and even powerfully made, that the government shall formally and officially abandon this fundamental and characteristic principle, and commit itself to the principle of religious legislation legislation in behalf of the name and institutions of a professed Chris- tianity which is only to commit itself to the principles of the papacy. 756 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. "If in the discussions preliminary to the establishment of this principle as part of the supreme law of this nation, Madison could say that, ' If with the salutary effects of this system under our own eyes, we begin to contract the bounds of religious freedom, we know no name which will too severely reproach our folly,' 1 how much more emphatically can the same thing be said upon the experience of more than a hundred years ! If in the face of all history on one hand, and this more than a hundred years of experience on the other, such a thing should be done, we may not only ask, What name would too severely reproach our folly? but, What punishment would be too severe for our wickedness ? If such a thing should be done, what wonder should there be if this national apostasy should be the signal of national ruin f "And has not the movement to accomplish this purpose attained sufficient prominence to make the prospect of its success worthy the serious consideration of every soul who has any love for the genuine principles of the religion of Jesus Christ, or any regard for the fundamental principles of the government of the United States, or any respect for the rights of mankind ? If that which has already been accomplished in this direction is not sufficient to arouse every such person to the most active and earnest diligence in defense of the divine heritage bestowed upon the world by Jesus Christ and bequeathed to us by our Revolutionary fathers, what more can be required to do it ? " We have seen the rise, the rapid growth, and the aim, both immediate and ultimate, of the strongest religious com- bination that could possibly be formed in the United States. And it is evident that the combination will leave no neces- sary means unemployed to accomplish its purpose. And, indeed, having already the sanction of such an array of relig- ious precedents on the part of the government, and the ^age 691, this book. REACTION IN INTERESTS OF THE PAPACY. 757 favor, from powerful sources, of so many distinct pieces of religious legislation, what is to hinder the complete success of the movement in its one chief aim ? " It is evident that even now all that remains is to bring the question to an issue where votes shall decide. If it shall be brought to a vote in Congress first, the probabilities are altogether in favor of its being carried. During the Fifty- first Congress, the New York Independent attempted a sort of census of the Sunday standing of members. There was not a majority of the members who replied, but the great majority^ of those who did reply expressed themselves in fa- vor of the governmental recognition of Sunday sacredness by closing the coming World's Fair on Sunday. " But even though a vote should fail in a Congress already elected, and the question should be made the issue in a congressional election, still the probabilities are that the religious combination could secure enough members to carry their scheme in some way to a successful issue. And if the combination can succeed in causing the government to bend to their will in a single point, everything else that they con- template will follow. If the first step be taken, the last step is then as certainly taken ; for the last step is in the first. "The government of the United States is the only one that has ever been on earth, which, by its fundamental prin- ciples and its supreme law, has been in harmony with the word of God as it respects earthly government ; the only one that was ever pledged to a distinct and positive separation from religion ; and therefore the only government since the papacy arose, that was ever fully separated from the princi- ples of the papacy. Against this the papacy and those who held to her principles, have always protested. They have always insisted that it was an experiment that never could 758 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. be made to succeed. Yet in spite of it all and in the face of the hoary principles of the mother of harlots, this nation in liberty and enlightenment lias been the admiration of all nations, and in progress has been the wonder of the world. And the influence which by these things, and above all by its absolutely free exercise of religious right, this govern- ment has exerted upon other nations, has surely and steadily weakened the hold of the papal principles upon them, till even Spain, the home of the Inquisition, has been led to grant toleration. "Now if this government of such glorious principles, shall be subverted, and shall be joined to the religion and put under the feet of an imperious hierarchy, and its hitherto splendid powers shall be prostituted to the vile uses of re- ligious oppression and persecution, the reactionary influence upon the other nations will be such as to lift the papacy to such a position of prominence and power as it never before possessed ; as much greater than that which it possessed in the midnight of the Dark Ages, as the world is larger now than it was then. In short, this reaction would lift the pa- pacy to the place where the prophecy would be fulfilled that, 'Power was given him over all kindreds and tongues and nations.' Rev. xiii, 7. "As surely as this thing shall ever be done, so surely will there be universal persecution. The exaltation of the day of the sun has been the greatest ambition of the spirit of the papacy from its earliest manifestation. And any one who will pause and think a little, will clearly see that the only religious thing there is, in the observance of which all nations agree is THE SUNDAY. They all likewise agree that its observance should be enforced by law. Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Russia, France, Belgium, Holland, Spain, Italy, Roumania, Scotland, England, the United States, Scandinavia, Brazil and other South American States, Aus- tralia, and even Japan Catholic, heathen, and so-called HYPOCRISY AND RUIN THE CONSEQUENCE. 759 Protestant alike all agree in the exaltation of Sunday to the highest place in human affairs, and in compelling all to observe it. And in all alike, hatred of a Christian's observ- ance of the Sabbath of the Lord, adds intensity to the zeal for the ' sacredness' of Sunday. "But, we repeat, the Sunday is the institution par excel- lence of the papacy that which 'the church' sets forth as the sign of her authority. The keeping of Sunday by Prot- estants ' is an homage they pay in spite of themselves to the authority of the Catholic Church;' so says 'the church,' and Protestants cannot disprove it. And when the nations exalt Sunday and compel its observance, they thereby cause men to honor, obey, and do homage to the papacy ; the ' man of sin ' is made once more the fountain of authority and the source of doctrine ; all men are compelled, under pains and penalties, to recognize it as such, and so, ' All that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.' Rev. xiii, 8. "And further saith the Scripture, 'I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them ; until the Ancient of Days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the Most High ; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.' Dan. vii, 21, 22. "Of course, in the eyes of those who demand such legis- lation, and even many others, such proceedings would not be considered persecution. It would only be enforcing the law. But no State has any right either to make or to enforce any such law. Such a law is wrong in itself ; the very making of it is wrong. And to obey such a law is wrong. All that any persecution has ever been, was only the enforcement of the law. 8 " And what would be the result? Precisely what it was before. As sure as the movement to commit the govern- 2 See pages 162-164 of this book. 760 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. ment of the United States to a course of religious legislation, shall succeed, so surely will there be repeated the history of Rome in the fourth and fifth centuries. "First, by hypocrisy, voluntary and enforced, there Will be a general depravity, described by inspiration thus : ' This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covet- ous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy. Without natural affection, truce-break- ers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good. Traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God. Having a form of godr liness, but denying the power thereof : from such turn away. . . . But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.' 2 Tim. iii, 1-5, 13. "Second, As before, society will grow so utterly corrupt that there will be no remedy, and only ruin can result. 3 The principles, the proposals, and the practices of this movement, are identical with those which characterized that church movement in the fourth century. Two things that are so alike in the making, can be no less alike when they are made. And two things that are so alike in every other respect, cannot possibly be any less alike in the final results. The events of the history have occurred in vain, if this is not the lesson which they teach, and the warning which they give. "By that 'mystic symbol of legal government,' its Great Seal, the Government of the United States stands pledged to 'A new order of things JVovus Ordo Seclorum /' and by this same symbol, it is declared that ' God Has Favored the Undertaking.' That God has favored the undertaking is certain, and is manifest to all the world. "Thus God has made the New Republic, the exemplar to all the world, of the true governmental principles. To this nation God has committed this sacred trust. How will the 8 See pages 512-516, 519 of this book. a THE ANSWER HAS BEEN GIVEN. 761 nation acquit itself ? how will the nation fulfill this divine obligation ? Will it maintain the high position which God has given it before all the nations ? or shall it be brought down from its high estate, be shorn of its power and its glory, and, bound and fettered, be led a captive in the ruin- ous triumph of the papacy ? Shall the new order of things prevail ? or shall the old order be restored ? " These are the living questions of the hour. The fate of the nation and of the world, depends upon the answer. The issue out of which the answer must come, even now hangs in the political balance. The answer itself even now trem- bles upon the tongue of time. "AND WHAT SHALL THE ANSWER BE?" Such were the concluding observations and inquiry of this book as it originally went forth in 1891. And before a year had passed, the probability that The Great Conspiracy would succeed had been turned into accomplished fact ; the answer to the above questions have been given in distinct tones by all three departments of the government the judiciary, the legislative, and the executive. And the answer was and is that, The New Order of Things should not con- tinue ; but that the Old Order of Things shall be restored, and the principles of the papacy, and in that the papacy itself, shall be triumphant. The first phase of this answer came from an unexpected source, and in an unexpected way from the Supreme Court of the United States, and in a wholly voluntary and an un- called-for way. The said decision came forth in this way : In 1887 Con- gress enacted a law forbidding any alien to come to this country under contract to perform labor or service of any kind. The reason of that law was that large contractors and corporations in the United States, would send agents to Europe to employ the lowest of the people whom they could get, to come over and work. They would pay their expenses 762 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. over, and because of this, require them to work at so much the smaller wages after they arrived. This was depreciating the price that Americans should receive for their labor, and therefore Congress enacted a law as follows : "Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passage of this act it shall be unlawful for any person, company, partnership, or corporation, in any manner whatsoever, to prepay the transportation, or in any way assist or encourage the importation or migration of any alien or aliens, any foreigner or foreigners, into the United States, its Terri- tories, or the District of Columbia, under contract or agreement, parol or special, expressed or implied, made previous to the importation or migra- tion of such alien or aliens, foreigner or foreigners, to perform labor or service of any kind in the United States, its Territories, or the District of Columbia." Trinity Church corporation, in New York City, hired a preacher in England to come over here and preach for them. They contracted with him before he came. He was an alien, and came over under contract to perform service for that church. The United States District Attorney entered suit against the church for violating this law. The United States Circuit Court decided that the church was guilty, and ren- dered judgment accordingly. An appeal was taken to the Supreme Court of the United States, upon writ of error. The Supreme Court reversed the decision, first upon the correct and well-established principle that "the intent of the lawmaker is the law." The court quoted directly from the reports of the Senate Committee and the House Committee who had the bill in charge when it was put through Con- gress ; and these both said in express terms that the term "'laborer,'' or "labor or service," used in the statute, was intended to mean only manual labor or service, and not professional service of any kind. For instance, the Senate Committee said : - " The committee report the bill back without amendment, although there are certain features thereof which might well be changed or modi- fied, in the hope that the bill may not fail'of passage during the present FEBRUARY 29, 1892. 763 session. Especially would the committee have otherwise recommended amendments, substituting for the expression, 'labor and service,' when- ever it occurs in the body of the bill, the words, 'manual labor' or 'manual service,' as sufficiently broad to accomplish the purposes of the bill, and that such amendments would remove objections which a sharp and perhaps unfriendly criticism may urge to the proposed legislation. The committee, however, believing that the bill in its present form will be construed as including only those whose labor or service is manual in character, and being very desirous that the bill become a law before the adjournment, have reported the bill without change. (6059, Congres- sional Record, 48th Congress.)" Such was the plainly declared intent of the law, by those who made it, arid at the time of the making of it, there was nothing left for the Supreme Court to do but to give effect to the law as it was intended, by reversing the decision of the court below. And in all reason when the court had thus made plain the intent of the law, this was all that was necessary to the decision of the case. But instead of stopping with this that was all-sufficient, the court took up a line of reasoning (?) by which it would reach the same point from another direction, and then as the result of each and of both, decided what the true intent of the law was and reversed the decision of the lower court ac- cordingly. And never was the aptness and wisdom of that piece of advice which Abraham Lincoln once gave to a friend " Never say what you need not, lest you be obliged to prove what you cannot "- more completely illustrated than in this unnecessary line of argument which was pursued by the Supreme Court of the United States in this decision of February 29, 1892. The court unanimously declares that "this is a religious people," "a religious nation," and even "a Christian na- tion," and that such is "the voice of the entire people." In support of these declarations the court offers considerable ar- gument, which will be noticed presently. But the first thing to be noted is that whether the court supported the declara- tions with considerable argument or with none at all, it had THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. no shadow of right to make any such declarations. By the whole history of the making of the Constitution, by its spirit, and by its very letter, the government of the United States, and therefore the Supreme Court as a co-or- dinate branch of the government, is precluded from declaring or arguing in favor of the Christian religion or any religion whatever. Let it not be forgotten that James Madison, in persuading the Virginia Convention to ratify the Constititu- tion, gave the assurance that "there is not a shadow of right in the general government to intermeddle with religion. Its least interference with it would be a most flagrant usurpa- tion."' And it is certain that in the declarations made, in the argument conducted, in the citations made, and in the conclusion reached, in this decision, the Supreme Court did "intermeddle with religion;" and in so doing did that which it had " not a shadow of right" to do. The first words of the Court in this line are as follows : "But beyond all these matters, no purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, State or national, because this is a re- ligious people. This is historically true. From the discovery of this continent to the present hour, there is a single voice making this affirmation." Every citizen of the United States knows that it is not true, either historically or otherwise, that this is a religious people. Not even a majority of the people are religious. There is not a single city in the United States in which the people are religious no, not a single town or village. That is to say, this was so up to the time of the rendering of this decision, February 29, 1892 ; since that, of course the people are religious because the Supreme Court says so. To be sure, some of our neighbors, and many other people whom we meet, do not know that they are religious people, as they have never chosen to be so and do not profess it at all ; but all that makes no difference ; the Supreme Court of * Page 695 of this book. ARE ALL THE PEOPLE CHRISTIANS? 765 the United States lias by unanimous decision declared that they are religious people, and it must be so whether they know it or not. Nor is this all. The court not only declares that this is a "religious nation," but that it is a " Christian nation." The people, therefore, are not only religious but they are Christians yes, Jews, infidels, and all. For is not the Supreme Court the highest judicial authority in the United States ? and what this court declares to be the law, is n't that the law ? and when this court lays it down as the supreme law as the meaning of the Constitution that the people are religious, and are Christians, then does n't that settle the question ? Not at all. The very absurdity of the suggestion only demonstrates that the court can have nothing at all to do with any such matters, and shows how completely the court transcended its powers and went out of the right way. No ; men are not made religious by law, nor by judicial decision, nor by historical precedents. The statement that "from the discovery of this continent to the present hour there is a single voice " making the affirmation that this nation is a religious people, is equally wide of the mark. For at the time of the making of this national government there was a new, fresh voice heard contradicting the long, dismal monotone of the ages, and declaring for this new nation that it "is not in any sense founded upon the Christian religion," and that it can never of right have anything to do with religion that it has "not a shadow of right to intermeddle with religion," and that "its least interference with it would be a most flagrant usurpation. " And this voice it was which gave rise to the "new order of things "for this country and for the world. Why did not the court heed this voice ? After this deliverance the court proceeds to cite historical evidences to prove the proposition that this is a "religious people" and a "Christian nation." The first is as follows : 766 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. "The commission to Christopher Columbus, prior to his sail westward is from ' Ferdinand and Isabella, by the grace of God, king and queen of Castile,' etc., and recites that, 'it is hoped that by God's assistance some of the continents and islands in the ocean will be discovered,' etc." What religion did Ferdinand and Isabella have in mind when they issued that document ? What religion did they profess ? And what religion did they possess, too ? The Catholic religion, to be sure. And not only that, it was the Catholic religion with the Inquisition in full swing, for it was Ferdinand and Isabella who established the Inquisition in Spain under the generalship of Torquemada, and who, because Spain was a "Christian nation," sentenced to con- fiscation of all goods, and to banishment, every Jew who would not turn Catholic. 5 And by virtue of such religious activity as this, Ferdinand and Isabella fairly earned as an everlasting reward, and by way of pre-eminence, the title of "THE CATHOLICS." And this is the first piece of " historical " authority by which the Supreme Court of the United States adjudges American citizens " to be a religious people," and by which that court decides that this is a " Christian nation." Now that is quoted to prove that this is a "religious peo- ple " and a " Christian nation ; " and it is declared that this language of Ferdinand and Isabella, and the language of the Constitution of the United States, "have one meaning." Then in view of that quotation and this decision, should it be wondered at if the Catholic Church should claim that this is so indeed, and should demand favors from the gov- ernment as such? Everybody knows that the Catholic Church already is not slow to take part in politica.1 ques- tions, to interfere with the government, and to have the gov- ernment recognize the Catholic Church and give it every 5 This sentence was inflicted too, after the commission to Christopher Columbus under which he discovered this " Christian nation ." THE PURPOSES OF THE BRITISH SOVEREIGNS. ^67 year from the public treasury nearly four hundred thousand dollars of the money of all the people. The people know that this is already the case. And now, when this Catholic document is cited by the Supreme Court to prove this a Christian nation ; and when that court declares that .this document and the Constitution have one meaning ; should it be thought strange if the Catholic Church should claim that that is correct, and act upon it ? However it is not denominational or "sectarian " Chris- tianity that the court proposes to recognize as the national religion here, but simply "Christianity, general Christian- ity." Accordingly, British documents are next quoted which designate "the true Christian faith 1 ' as professed in the church of England in colonial times. And here is the quo- tation : - "The first colonial grant, that~made to Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584, was from ' Elizabeth, by the grace of God ; of England, Fraunce, and Ireland, queene, Defender of the Faith,' etc.; and the grant authorized him to enact statutes for the government of the proposed colony ; Provided, That, ' they be not against the true Christian faith now pro- fessed in the Church of England.' 6 . . . Language of a similar import may be found in the subsequent charters, . . . and the same is-true of the various charters granted to other colonies. In language more or less emphatic, is the establishment of the Christian religon declared to be one of the purposes of the grant." 7 It is true that "the establishment of the Christian re- ligion was one of the purposes" of all these grants. But are the American people still bound by the purposes and intentions 6 Turu to pages 584, 585, and 593 of this book and it will be seen what was the " true Christian faith " professed in the Church of England in Queen Elizabeth's time. 7 It may very properly be noted here, in passing, that this and the previous quotation, just as certainly prove the divine right of rulers in this country, as they prove that this is " a religious people " or " a Christian nation." And this is the logic of the discussion, too ; for it is plainly declared that these documents and the Constitution have all one language and " one meaning." 57 768 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS of Queen Elizabeth and her British successors ? Does Britain still rule America, that the intent and purposes of British sovereigns shall be held binding upon the American people? Nay, nay. After all these documents were issued there was the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independ- ence, by which it was both declared and demonstrated that these Colonies are and of right ought to be free and inde- pendent States free and independent of British rule, and the intents and purposes of British sovereigns in all things, religious as well as civil. 8 It is true that " the establishment of the Christian relig- ion was one of the purposes" of these grants. But shall the Constitution of the United States count for nothing, when it positively prohibits any religious test, and any establish- ment of religion of any kind ? Shall the supreme law of this nation count for nothing in its solemn declaration that "the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion " ? Has the Supreme Court of the United States the right to supplant the supreme law of this land with the intents and purposes of the sovereigns of England ? Is the Supreme Court of the United States the interpreter of the supreme law of the United States ? or is it the interpreter of the intents and purposes of the sovereigns of England, France, and Ireland, "Defenders of the Faith " ? It is true that " the establishment of the Christian re- ligion was one of the purposes " of these grants ; and that purpose was accomplished in the colonies settled under those grants. But though all this be true, what possible bearing can that rightly have on any question under the Constitution and laws of the national government? The national system was not intended to be a continuation of the colonial system ; on the contrary, it was intended to be distinct from both the colonial and State systems. And the chief, the very funda- mental, distinction that the national system was intended to 8 See page 683 of this book. LOGICAL SUBSTANCE OF THE ARGUMENT. have from both the others was in its complete separation from every idea of an establishment of religion. And though it be true that all the colonies except Rhode Island had establishments of" the Christian religion" in pursuance of the purpose of these British grants ; and though all the States except Rhode Island and Virginia had these same establishments of " the Christian religion " when the national system was organized ; yet this had no bearing whatever upon the national system except to make all. the more emphatic its total separation from them all, and from every conception of an establishment of "the Christian religion." Let us reduce to the form of a short and direct argument this reasoning of the court. The proposition to be proved is, "this is a Christian nation." The leading member is, "the establishment of the Christian religion was one of the purposes " of the British grants here. We have then the prin- cipal statement and the conclusion. But this is not enough ; we must know how the conclusion follows from the leading statement. So far the argument stands merely thus : (a) "The establishment of the Christian religion was one of the purposes of the British grants in America." (5) "This is a Christian nation." But this will never do ; there is a destructive hiatus be- tween the two statements. This blank must be tilled, or else there is a total absence of reasoning, and the conclusion is nothing. With what, then, shall this blank be tilled ? It could be filled thus : (a) "The establishment of the Christian religion was one of the purposes of the British grants in America." (b) "America is subject to British sovereignty." (c) Consequently, in the meaning of the law, "this is a Christian nation." This would complete the formula, would give the conlu- sion something to rest upon, and would connect it with the 770 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. leading statement. But the difficulty with it is that it is not true. It is not only contrary to the history and the experi- ence of the nations concerned, but it is contrary to the argument of the court itself ; for the court, in its argument, does recognize and name the Declaration of Independence, and the national Constitution. This thought then is not allowable in the argument. What thought, then, will fit the place and make the for- mula complete? There is one, and only one possible thought, that can fit the place and make the connection be- tween the court's premise and its conclusion. That thought is given by the court itself as the turning-point, and is indeed, the pivot the very crucial test of the argument of the court. Here is the statement in the words of the court : (a) "The establishment of the Christian religion is de- clared to be one of the purposes of the [British] grants [in America]." () " This declaration and the national Constitution have one language and ' one meaning.' ' (c) Consequently, " this is a Christian nation." This and this alone is the course of reasoning by which the court reaches its conclusion that " this is a Christian na- tion." This is the thought, and indeed those are the words of the court. The thing is accomplished solely by making the language of the Constitution bear "one meaning" with these quoted declarations whose purpose was plainly "the establishment of the Christian religion." But some may say, This formula encounters the same difficulty as did the other one ; viz., it is not true, and is contrary to all the history and experience of the nation in the times of the making of the Constitution. It is true that 9 Immediately after quoting the First Amendment to the Constitution, along with all these other documents, the court's words are these : " There is no dissonance in these declarations. There is a universal language pervading them all, having one meaning. They affirm and reaffirm that this is a religious nation." THE DECISIVE POINT. 771 the connecting statement between the premise and the con- clusion in this latter formula is, in itself, as false as is that one in the former. It is true that the Constitution was never intended to bear any such meaning as is here given to it in harmony with the declarations quoted. It was both intended and declared to bear a meaning directly the opposite of that which these declarations bear. And if any other person, persons, or tribunal, on earth (except all the people) had said that such is the meaning of the Constitution, it would have amounted to nothing. Such a statement made by the Supreme Court, however, does amount to something. And HERE IS THE DECISIVE POINT. The Supreme Court of the United States is constitution- ally authorized to interpret, and declare the meaning of, the Constitution. Whatever the Supreme Court says the mean- ing of the Constitution is, that is legally and constitutionally its meaning so long as said decision stands. The meaning which the court gives to the Constitution may be utterly false, as in the Dred Scott decision and in this one, but that matters nothing ; the false meaning stands as firmly as though it were true, until the decision is reversed either by the Supreme Court itself, or by the higher court the people as was done in the matter of the Dred Scott decision, of which this decision now under consideration is a complete parallel. Such then is indisputably the meaning which the Su- preme Court of the United States has given to the Constitu- tion of the United States a meaning the purpose of which is "the establishment of the Christian religion." This is a meaning which by every particle of evidence derivable from the makers and the making of the Constitution is demon- strated to be directly the reverse of that which it was in- tended to bear and which it did bear while the makers of it lived. Therefore as certainly as logic is logic, and truth is truth, it is demonstrated that in this decision the Supreme 772 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. Court of the United States has subverted the Constitution of the United States in its essential meaning as regards the Christian religion or the establishment thereof. Nor was the court content with a little. These declara- tions of Ferdinand and Isabella, Elizabeth, James I, et al., were not sufficient to satisfiy the zeal of the court in behalf of "Christianity, general Christianity," as the established and national religion here ; but it must needs heap upon these fifteen more, from different sources, to the same pur- pose. Having extracted the logical substance of the court's argument throughout, in the foregoing analysis, it will not be necessary for us to apply the set formula to each citation in all the long list. This the reader can readily enough do in his own mind. We shall, however, present all of the court's quotations and its application of them, with such further remarks as may be pertinent. Next following the citations from Ferdinand and Isa- bella, Elizabeth, and the others of Britain, the court sets forth documents of the New England Puritans which also plainly declare that "the establishment of the Christian re- ligion was one of the purposes" of their settlement in the land. Here is the language of the court and of the Puri- tans : "The celebrated compact made by the Pilgrims in the 'Mayflower,' 1620, recites: 'Having undertaken for the glory of God and Advance- ment of the Christian faith, and the honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia ; Do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually, in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends aforesaid.' "The fundamental orders of Connecticut, under which a provisional government was instituted in 1638-1639, commence with this declara- tion: " 'Forasmuch as it hath pleased the Almighty God by the wise dis- pensation of his diuyne pruidence so to order and dispose of things that we the inhabitants and residents of Windsor, Hartford, and Wethersfield "CONECTECOTTE" AND PENNSYLVANIA. 773 are now cohabiting and dwelling in and upon the River Conectecotte and the Lands thereunto adioyneing ; and well knowing where a people are gathered together, the word of God requires that to mayntayne the peace and vnion of such a people there should be an orderly and decent Government established according to God, to order and dispose of the affayres of the people at all seasons as occasion shall require ; doe there- fore assotiate and conioyne ourselves to be as one publike State or Com- onwelth ; and doe, for ourselves and our successors and such as shall be adioyned to vs att any tyme hereafter, enter into Combination and Con- federation togather, to mayutayne and presearue the liberty and purity of the gospell of our Lord Jesus wch we now prfesse, as also the disci- plyne of the churches, wch according to the truth of the said gospell is now practised amongst us.'" It is worthy of remark in this connection, that by this "historical" citation, the Supreme Court just as certainly justifies the employment of the "civil body politick" for the maintenance of "the disciplyne of the churches," as by this and the previous ones it establishes the Christian religion as the religion of this nation. For it was just as much and as directly the intention of those people to maintain the disci- pline of the churches, as it was to "preserve the liberty and purity of the gospel then practiced " among them. Indeed, it was only by maintaining the discipline of the churches that they expected to preserve "the liberty and purity of the gospell " as there and then practiced. All their history shows that they never thought, nor made any pretensions, of doing it in any other way. And in fact, order number four of these very "fundamental orders" required that the gov- ernor of that "publike State or Comonwelth " should "be always a member of some approved congregation," and should take an oath that he would "further the execution of justice according to the rule of God's word ; so help me God in .the name of the Lord Jesus Christ." 10 And we know and have abundantly shown that the main- tenance of the discipline of the churches by the power of 10 See pages 602-604, 608 aud 620-621 of tbis book. 774 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. "the civil Body Politick" is precisely what the churches of the United States design to accomplish through the enforce- ment of national Sunday laws. This is what is done always in the enforcement of Sunday laws whether State or national. And all this purpose, the Supreme Court fully sanctions and justifies in its (mis)interpretation of the national Constitution, when it declares that the language of these "fundamental orders of Connecticut " and the language of the national Constitution is " one language " " having one meaning." The court proceeds : "Iii the charter of privileges granted by William Penn to the province of Pennsylvania, in 1701, it is recited: 'Because no People can be truly happy, though under the greatest Enjoyment of Civil Liberties, if abridged of the Freedom of their Consciences, as to their Religious Profession and Worship ; And Almighty God being the only Lord of Conscience, Father of Lights and Spirits ; and the Author as well as Object of all divine Knowledge, Faith and Worship, who only doth enlighten the Minds, and persuade and convince the Understandings of People, I do hereby grant and declare,' etc." Yes. and the same document provided that in order to "be capable to serve the government in any capacity" a person must " also profess to believe in Jesus Christ the Saviour of the world." And according to the same docu- ment, in order to be assured that "he should in no ways be molested," etc., a person living in that province was re- quired to "confess and acknowledge the only Almighty and Eternal God to be Creator, Upholder, and Ruler of the world." Still citing proof that this is a Christian nation, the court continues in the following queer fashion : "Coming nearer to the present time, the Declaration of Independence recognizes the presence of the Divine in human affairs in these words : 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.' ' We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General PERVERSION OF THE DECLARATION. Y75 Congress Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare,' etc. : 'And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.'" It is undoubtedly true that the Declaration of Independ- ence does recognize the presence of the Divine in human affairs. But it is a hazardous piece of logic to conclude from this that " this is a Christian nation." For what nation has there ever been on earth that did not recognize the presence of the Divine in human affairs ? But it would be rather risky to conclude from this that all nations have been and are " Christian 'nations." But, it may be said, This recognizes the " Creator," and "the Supreme Judge of the world," as well as "Divine Providence." Yes, that is true, too. And so do the Turks, the Arabs, the Hindoos, and others ; but that would hardly justify the Supreme Court or anybody else in con- cluding and officially declaring that Turkey, Arabia, and Hindoostan, are Christian nations. But it may still be said that those who made this Declara- tion used these expressions with none other than the God of Christianity in mind. This may or may not be true, ac- cording to the way of thinking of the respective individuals who signed or espoused the Declaration. 11 But whatever these expressions may have meant to those who used them at the time, it is certain that they did not mean what the Su- preme Court has here made them mean. Of this we have the most positive evidence. 11 Thomas Paine, though not a signer of the Declaration, had no small part in bringing it about, and it is certain that he did most heartily support it. And it is evident enough that he did not use these terms with reference to Chris- tianity, nor with the intention to establish " a Christian nation " here. Ethan Allen, the Green Mountain hero, was another, and there were thousands oi others. 770 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. Thomas Jefferson was the author of the Declaration of In- dependence, and from that day and forward he exerted all his powers to ^establish "the true Christian faith professed in the Church of England," which according to the purpose of Elizabeth and her successors had been established in Vir- ginia for more than a hundred and fifty years. When this was accomplished, and an attempt was made to establish "Christianity, general Christianity," under the title of "the Christian religion," Jefferson again enlisted all his powers to defeat the attempt, and it was defeated. And to the day of his death, the one thing in all his career upon which he looked with the most satisfaction was this disestablishment of " the Christian religion " in Virginia. And now, lo ! this document of which Jefferson was the author is quoted by the Supreme Court of the United States and classed with docu- ments "one of the purposes" of which was "the establish- ment of the Christian religion," and, as having " one mean- ing " with these, is used to prove a proposition with reference to this nation which Jefferson spent all his powers and the best part of his life in combating ! What would Jefferson himself say to this use of his language were he Jiere to read this decision ( la Except in the matter of the Dred Scott decison, a more perverse use of the language of the Declaration of Independ- ence certainly never was made, than is thus made in this "Christian nation" decision, February 29, 1892. Next the court says : "If we examine the constitutions of the various States, we find in them a constant recognition of religious obligations. Every constitution of every one of the forty-four States contains language which either directly or by clear implication recognizes a profound reverence for religion and an assumption that its influence in all human affairs is essential to the well being of the community." This is all true enough in itself ; but even though it be true respecting all the States, that can have no bearing what- 1 - Pages 693, 694, this book. WHAT IS THE NATION? 777 ever in any matter respecting the nation or the national jurisdiction or the consideration of any national question. The Constitution declares that - "The powers not delegated to (he United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to States respectively, or to the people." No power in, over, or concerning religion has been dele- gated to the United States the nation by the Constitution, nor has such power been prohibited by it to the States. On the contrary, any such power has actually been prohibited to the United States by the Constitution. All power and jurisdiction, therefore, in all questions and all matters of whatever kind concerning religion, are reserved, and belong exclusively to the States or to the people. And even though all the forty-four States had one and the same religion and that specifically and by law established, this would mean absolutely nothing, and could never rightly be made to mean anything, to the United States, i. e., to the nation. The Supreme Court of the nation therefore has no right to cite religious characteristics of the States, and then from these draw conclusions and make official declarations that the nation is " religious" or " Christian " or anything else in the way of religion. This is why Madison said that "there is not a shadow of right in the general government to intermeddle with religion." And this is why he also declared that the " least interference " of the general govern- ment with religion "would be a most flagrant usurpation." This, because in so doing it would be intruding into a field and entering upon the consideration of that which is not only reserved but positively prohibited. The United States the nation indeed is not composed of the States. The original thirteen States did not compose the nation, nor do the forty-four now compose it. The United States, the nation, is that power, that system, that organization, above all the States and distinct from them, which was created to perform in behalf of the States and the 778 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. people, what neither the people, nor any State, nor yet all the States together, could do for themselves. When the thirteen colonies, by conquering the British forces and se- curing the recognition of their independence, had demon- strated that "these colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States," that is exactly what they were. They were not only free and independent of Great Britain, but they were free and independent of each other. Each State was as free and independent of all the others as though it stood alone on this continent. True, Articles of Confed- eration had'been entered into under which a Congress acted. But the Congress had no real power. It could recommend to the States, measures to be carried into effect, but the States could and did do just as they pleased as to paying any atten- tion to the recommendations. If the measure suited them, they would act upon it, but if not, they would n't. And if it suited part of them and did not suit the rest, even if it met the approval of all but one, only the ones that chose would comply with the recommendation, and as to the others, or the other one, there was no power on earth that could require them or it to act with the States that chose to comply. Washington described the situation by saying : " We are one nation to-day, and thirteen to-morrow." This is the exact truth. Practically they were thirteen independent nations, just as those of Europe are. Finding that they could not long exist with such a fast- and-loose order of things as that, "a federal nation" was created to perform, by delegated powers, in behalf of the States and the people, what could not be performed by them- selves. Such is the origin and purpose of this nation. And this is the nation. As is well stated by another: "From 1776 to 1789 the United States were a confederation ; after 1789 it was a federal nation." Fiske. ls Yet in the nation each State respectively retains its own full sovereignty, and each citizen individually his own full 13 " Civil Government," p. 234. RELIGION IN THE STATES. 779 freedom, in all things "not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States." Arid as no power in matters of religion has been delegated to the nation, but on the contrary all such power has been posi- tively prohibited to the nation, so the Supreme Court of the nation was doubly precluded from drawing from the example of the States anything on the subject of religion, and was also doubly precluded from ever making any such declara- tion as that "this is a Christian nation." It is worth while however to give the citations which the court makes from the State constitutions, that the use which the court makes of the national Constitution in connection therewith may be clearly seen. So here they are exactly as the court sets them forth, except italics : "This recognition may be in the preamble, such as is found in the Constitution of Illinois, 1870: 'We, the people of the State of Illinois, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political, and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing upon our endeavors to secure and transmit the same unimpaired to succeeding generations,' etc. "It may be only in the familiar requisition that all officers shall take an oath closing with the declaration ' so help me God.' It may be in clauses like that of the Constitution of Indiana, 1816, Article XI, section 4 : 'The manner of administering an oath or affirmation shall be such as is most consistent with the conscience of the deponent, and shall be es- teemed the most solemn appeal to God.' Or in provisions such as are found in Articles 36 and 37 of the Declaration of Rights of the Constitu- tion of Maryland, 1867: 'That as it is the duty of every man to itorship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to Him, all persons are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty ; wherefore, no person ought, by any law, to be molested in his person or estate on account of his religious persuasion or profession, or for his religious practice, unless, under the color of religion, he shall disturb the good order, peace, or safety of the State, or shall infringe the laws of morality, or injure others in their natural, civil, or religious rights; nor ought any person to be compelled to frequent or maintain or contribute, unless on contract, to maintain any place of worship, or any ministry ; nor shall any person, otherwise competent, be deemed incompetent as a witness, or juror, on account of his religious belief: Provided, He believes in the existence of God, and that, under His dispensation, such person will be held morally 780 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. accountable for his acts, and be rewarded or punished therefor, either in this world or the world to come. That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, other than a declaration of belief in the eiisten.ce of God; nor shall the leg- islature prescribe any other oath of office than the oath prescribed by this constitution." Or like that in Articles 2 and 3, of Part 1st, of the Con- stitution of Massachusetts, 1780: 'It is the right as well as the duty of all men in society publicly and at stated seasons, to worship the Supreme Be- iny, the Great Creator and Preserver of the universe. . . . As the happiness of a people and the good order and preservation of civil government essen- tially depend upon piety, religion, and morality, and as these cannot be gen- erally diffused through a community but by the institution of the public worship of God and of public instructions in piety, religion, and morality; Therefore, to promote their happiness and to secure the good order and preservation of their government, the people of this commonwealth have a right to invest their legislature -with power to authorize and require, and the legislature shall, from time to time, authorize and require, the several towns, parishes, precincts, and other bodies-politic or religious societies to make suitable provisions, at their own expense, for the institution of the public worship of God and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion, and morality in all cases where such provision shall- not be made voluntarily.' Or as in sections 5 and 14 of Article 7, of the Constitution of Mississippi, 1832: ' No person who denies the being of a God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this State. . . , Religion, morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government, the preservation of liberty, and the happiness of mankind, schools, and the means of educa- tion, shall forever be encouraged in this State.' Or by Article 22 of the Constitution of Delaware, 1776, which required all officers, besides an oath of allegiance, to make and subscribe the following declaration: 'I, A. B., do prof ess faith in God the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy Ghost, one God, bkssed for evermore; and I do acknowl- edge the Holy Scriptures of ftie Old and New Testaments to be given by divine inspiration.' " And the doctrine that is held all through the decision, that these quotations and the Constitution speak the same language and have one meaning, is just at this point em- phasized in the following words : "Even the Constitution of the United States, which is supposed to have little touch upon the private life of the individual, contains in the First Amendment a declaration common to the constitutions of all the Slates, as DOES THE CONSTITUTION MEAN THIS? 781 follows: 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of re- ligion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.' And also provides that the Executive shall. have ten days (Sundays excepted) within which to determine whether he will approve or veto a bill. [Here is a sly indica- tion that the enforcement of Sunday observance is constitutional.] " There u no dissonance in these declarations. There is a universal lan- guage pervading them all, having one meaning; they affirm and re-affirm that this is a religious nation. These are not individual sayings, declara- tions of private persons ; they are organic utterances; they speak the voice of the entire people. " According to this interpretation, then, when the Consti- tution of the United States declares that "no religious test sJiall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States," it means that "no religious test ought ever to be required .... other than a belief in the existence of God" and of " a future state of rewards and punishments," and a profession of " faith in God the Father, and in Jesus Christ his only Son, and in the Holy Ghost, one God, blessed forevermore ; and I do acknowledge the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be given by divine inspiration." For this is what the Constitutions of Maryland, Mississippi, and Delaware plainly mean ; and these and the Constitution of the United States are pervaded by a "universal language," "having one meaning" ! ! ! And when-the Constitution of the United States declares that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, "it means that the Congress " shall, from time to time, authorize and require the several towns, parishes, - precincts, and other bodies-politic, or religious societies, to make suitable provisions, at their own expense, for the institution of the public worship of God, and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion, and morality, in all cases where such provisions shall not be made voluntarily " ! ! ! For plainly that is what the Constitution of Massachusetts means, and behold that and the Constitution of 'the United States are pervaded by " a universal language " " having one meaning" ! 782 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. How the court could present such a string of quotations, every one of which distinctly contemplated an establishment of religion and the prohibition of the free exercise thereof, and then quote this clause of the national Constitution, which in every feature and every intent, absolutely prohibits any establishment of religion, and any interference with the free exercise thereof how the court could do all this and then declare that "there is no dissonance " in the declarations, that they all have the same language, and " one meaning," is a most astonishing thing. If such a thing had been done by any of the common run of American citizens, it could have been considered as nothing less than wildly absurd ; but coming as it does from such a source as the Supreme Court of the whole nation, it is as far worse as could be possible. To say that it is absurd is not enough, it is simply preposterous. And yet, preposterous as it is, it is expected to, and, so far as the great mass of the people are concerned, it undoubtedly will, carry with it all the weight of supreme national law. All this is bad enough, and preposterous enough, in itself; but there is another consideration that even magnifies it, that is, the leaving out, the complete ignoring, of all of the history and all the essential facts which are pertinent to the question. 14 Why should the court leave out Jefferson, Madison, and Washington from the place where they only and wholly belong, and drag Ferdinand, Isabella, and Elizabeth into the place where they do not and cannot by any shadow of right belong? Why should Jefferson, Madison, and Washington not only be allowed no place by the court, but be compelled by the court to give place to Ferdinand, Isa- bella, and Elizabeth ? Why should the purposes of Jefferson, Madison, and Washington, and the other fathers who made this nation, be completely ignored, and the purposes of Ferdinand, Isabella, Elizabeth, and the Puritans be taken up and exalted to their place ? Why should all the history of the u Glance again at pages 682-696 and consider this point. THE ABSURDITY OF IT. 783 making of the national Constitution be ignored as completely as though there were no such history, and all this other stuff be taken up and discussed and approved as though this were the only historical evidence there is on the subject? Why should the national Constitution be interpreted and construed according to the purposes of Ferdinand, Isabella, Elizabeth and her successors ; the Puritans ; and the constitutions of the States; instead of the purposes of Jefferson, Madison, Washington, and the other fathers who made it ? Why should the real meaning which our Fathers gave to the Con- stitution be supplanted with a meaning that is as foreign to it as the sovereigns of Spain and England are foreign to the nation itself to-day ? Why should the only history that is pertinent to the question be wholly ignored, and that which in every element is absolutely impertinent be exalted and honored in its stead ? The language in which Abraham Lincoln characterized the position of Chief Justice Taney in the Dred Scott decis- ion, and of Stephen A. Douglas in the defense of it, is the language that is most fitting to the position of the Supreme Court in this "Christian nation" decision; for here the two decisions are perfectly parallel. Lincoln's words are as follows : "I ask, How extraordinary a ^ing it is that a man who has occupied a seat on the floor of the Senate [or on the bench of the Supreme Court A. T. j.] of the United States . . . pretending to give a truthful and accurate history of the slavery question [or of the question of re- ligion and the nation A. T. j.] in this country, should so entirely ignore the whole of that portion of our history the most important of all ! Is it not a most extraordinary spectacle, that a man should stand up and ask for any confidence in his statements, who sets out as he does with portions of history, calling upon the people to believe that it is a true and fair representation, when the leading part, the controlling feature, of the whole history is carefully surpressed ? "And now he asks the community to believe that the men of the Revolution were in favor of his ' great principle,' when we have the naked history that they themselves dealt with this very subject-matter of his principle, and utterly repudiated his principle acting upon a 58 784 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. precisely contrary ground. It is as impudent and absurd as if a prose- outing attorney should stand up before a jury, and ask them to convict A as the murderer of B, while B was standing alive before them." But the court does not stop even here. Having estab- lished "the Christian religion" for "the entire people, "and settled all the appurtenances thereto as within the meaning of the Constitution, the court cites and sanctions the declara- tion of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that "Christian- ity, general Christianity, is, and always has been, part of the common law," and then proceeds to sanction also the doc- trine that it is blasphemy to speak or act in contempt "of the religion professed by almost the whole community." This is done by citing the pagan decision of "Chancellor Kent, the great commentator on American law, speaking as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New York " which "assumes that we are a Christian people." Here is the lan- guage of the court on that strain : "While because of the general recognition of this truth the question has seldom been presented to the courts, yet we find that in Updegraph vs. The Commonwealth (11 Serg. and Rawle, 394, 400) it was decided that 'Christianity, general Christianity, is, and always has been a part of the common law of Pennsylvania; . . . not Christianity with an estab- lished church, and tithes, and spiritual courts ; but Christianity with lib- erty of conscience to all men.' And in The People vs. Ruggles (8 Johns. 290, 294, 295), Chancellor Kent, the great commentator on American law, speaking as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New York, said : ' The people of this State, in common witii the people of this country, profess the general doctrines of Christianity, as the rule of their faith and practice ; and to scandalize the Author of these doctrines is not only, in a religious point of view, extremely impious, but, even in respect to the obligations due to society, is a gross violation of decency and good order. . . . The free, equal, and undisturbed enjoyment of religious opinion, whatever it may be, and free and decent discussions on any religious subject, is granted and secured ; but to revile, with malicious and blasphe- mous contempt, the religion prof essed by almost the whole community, is an abuse of that riyJit. Nor are we bound, by any expressions in the Con stitution, as some have strangely supposed, either not to punish at all, or to punish indiscriminately, the like attacks upon the religion of Mahomet or of the Grand Lama; and for this plain reason, that the case assumes that STATE AUTHORITY NOT NATIONAL AUTHORITY. 785 we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply in- grafted upon Christianity, and not upon the doctrines or worship of those impostors.' And in the famous case of Vidal vs. Girard's Executors (2 How., 127, 198), this court, while sustaining the will of Mr. Girard, with its provision for the creation of a college into which no minister should be permitted to enter, observed: 'It is also said, and truly, that the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania.'" But even though it be decided, and declared, and ad- mitted, that "Christianity, general Christianity, is and al- ways has been " not only a part but the whole of the common law, and the statute law also, of Pennsylvania ; and that it is "blasphemy" in New York to speak or act in contempt of the established religion ; that never can rightly be made to mean anything to the nation. And even though all this were a fact within the legitimate consideration of the Su- preme Courts of Pennsylvania. New York, and all the other State Supreme Courts in the land, it never could by any kind of right be a fact within the legitimate consideration of the Supreme Court of the nation in the construction of any na- tional law or the decision of any national question. There remains but one thing more to complete the per- fect likeness of the whole papal system, and that is the direct and positive sanction of Sunday laws. Nor is this one thing lacking. As before, observed, it is indirectly indicated in the quotation from the national Constitution. But the court does not stop with that ; it makes Sunday laws one of the "organic utterances," which prove conclusively that "this is a Christian nation." The words are as follows : "If we pass beyond these matters to a view of American life as ex- pressed by its laws, its business, its customs, and its society, we find everywhere a clear recognition of the same truth. Among other matters, note the following : The form of oath usually prevailing, concluding with an appeal to the Almighty; the custom of opening sessions of all deliber- ative bodies, and most conventions, with prayer; the prefatory words of all wills, 'In the name of God, Amen;' the laics respecting the observance of the Sabbath with the general cessation of all secular business, and the closing of courts, legislatures, and other similar public assemblies on that day. . . . These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a 786 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that THIS is A CHRISTIAN NATION. Here we may properly reduce to the simple and direct form again this whole discussion as presented by the court. So stated it stands thus : - (a) "The establishment of the Christian religion," " Christianity, general Christianity," " is one of the purposes of all these " documents. (5) "Even the Constitution of the United States, . . . contains in the First Amendment a declaration common to" all these ; for " there is a universal language pervading tltem all, having one meaning; they affirm and re-affirm that this is a religious nation. . . . They are organic utterances ; they speak the voice of the entire people." (c) Consequently, "this is a Christian nation." And therefore the decision concludes, "The construction ["of this statute"] invoked cannot be accepted as correct. It is a case where there was presented a definite evil, in view of which the legislature used general terms with the purpose of reach- ing all phases of that evil, and thereafter, unexpectedly, it is developed that the general language thus employed is broad enough to reach cases and acts which the whole Instory and life of the country affirm could not have been intentionally legislated against. It is the duty of the courts, under those circumstances, to say that, however broad the language of the statute may be, the act, although within the letter, is not within the intention of the legislature, and therefore cannot be within the statute. "The judgment will be reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion." "In accordance with this opinion " then let us recapitu- late, and see what has been done by it. "The Christian re- ligion," that is, "Christianity, general Christianity," is legally recognized and declared to be the established religion of this nation, and that consequently "this is a Christian nation." With this also, "in language more or less em- phatic," there is justified by the "meaning" of the Con- stitution of the United States, (1) the maintenance of the discipline of the churches by the civil power; (2) the require- THE "NEW ORDER OP THINGS" REVERSED. 787 ment of the religious oath; (3) the requirement of the relig- ious test oath as a qualification for office; (4) public taxation for the support of religion and religious teachers; (5) the re- quirement of a belief in the Trinity and the inspiration of the "Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments;" (0) the guilt of blasphemy upon every one who speaks or acts in contempt of the established religion; and (7) laws for the observance of Sunday, with the general cessation of all "secular business." All this is declared by unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of the United States to be the meaning of the Consti- tution of the United States. And what the Supreme Court says the meaning of the Constitution is, that is its meaning and that is the law until the decision is reversed. Therefore, again we say, and it is not too much to say; as certainly as logic is logic, and truth is truth, it is demonstrated that in this decision the Supreme court of the United States has sub- verted the Constitution of the United States in its essential meaning as regards the Christian religion or the establish- ment thereof. Now what more was ever required by the papacy, and all phases of the old order of things, than is thus brought within the meaning of the national Constitution by this de- cision ? What more was ever required by the papacy itself, than that "the Christian religion" should be the national religion ; that the discipline of the Church should be main- tained by the civil power ; that the religious test-oath should be applied to all ; that the public should be taxed for the support of religion and religious worship ; that there should be required a belief in the doctrine of the Trinity, and the inspiration of the "Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament; " that the guilt of "blasphemy " 16 should be vis- 15 It will not be amiss right here to recall the fact that Martin Luther, by an official edict issued by the Emperor Charles V, was made an outlaw in all Europe, because he had " sought to destroy the holy church by means of books flllfd with blasphemy." 788 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. ited upon every one who should speak or act "in contempt of the religion professed by almost the whole community ; " and that everybody should be required by law to observe Sunday? Indeed what more than this could be required or even desired by the most absolute religious despotism that could be imagined ? Therefore it is pertinent here to inquire, Does this decision maintain the "New Order of Things" to which this nation stands pledged by the Great Seal of the United States ? No, no, twenty times no. On the contrary it sanctions, and restores, and fastens upon this nation, the old order of things which our revolutionary fathers hoped that we should forever escape, through their sublime efforts which culminated in the creation of this nation and the formation of the national Constitution as it reads, and as they meant it. What more could be done to create the very image of the papacy in this nation, in the principle of the thing, than is done in this decision? In principle we say ; not in its posi- tive workings of course, because the decision in itself, on this point, does not bear the force of a statute that can be made at once obligatory upon all by the executive power of the nation. But it does sanction and justify beforehand any and every encroachment that the religious power may make on the civil, and every piece of legislation that Congress might enact on the subject of religion or religious observ- ances ; so that by it the national door is opened wide for the religious element to enter and take possession in whatever way it chooses or can make effective. And there stands at the door ready and determined to enter and take possession, the strongest religio-political combination that could be formed in the land. Therefore we say that although life is not by this given to this image that it should of itself speak and act (Rev. 13 : 15) ; yet so far as the making of the evil thing, and the establishment of the principle of it, are concerned, it is cer- THE IMAGE OF THE PAPACY. 789 tainly done. The tree does not yet stand with its branches widespread bearing its pernicious fruit, but the tree implanted. And as certainly as the branches and the fruit are all in the natural stock that is planted, and it is only a question of time when they will appear, so certainly the widespreading branches and the pernicious fruit of the full-grown tree of religious despotism are in the evil stock of Church and State, of "the establishment of the Christian religion," that has been planted by the Supreme Court in and for this nation ; and it is only a question of time when these fruits will inevit- ably appear. Look again at pages 281-293 of this book ; and see how, and how rapidly too, this same thing progressed before. There it is seen how that there was in the Roman Empire, as there is now in the. United States, a powerful ecclesiastical organization, the leaders and managers of which were "only anxious to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for themselves." And as we have seen, the Edict of Milan, which among other things ordered that the confiscated church property should be restored "to the whole body of Chris- tians," was no sooner issued than this hierarchy seized upon it and made it an issue by which to secure the imperial recognition and legal establishment of the Catholic Church of the Christians, by asserting her arrogant claim that she only is Christian and all others are heretics and therefore not Christians at all. And we have seen how fully she succeeded in this arrogant and insidious enterprise. Nor was* she long in accomplishing it. The Edict of Milan was issued in March, A. D. 313. Before that month expired, the de- cision was rendered that the imperial favors were for the Catholic Church only. In the autumn of the same year 313 the first council sat to decide which was the Catholic Church. In the summer of 314 sat the second council on the same question. And in 316 the decree was sent to Cecilianus empowering him to distribute that money to the 790 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. ministers of "the legitimate and most holy Catholic religion," and to use the civil power to force the Donatists to submit to the decision of the councils and the emperor. The Edict of Milan, March, 313, named "the whole body of Christians" as the beneficiaries, without any qualification or any sectarian designation. Before the expiration of that month, the provisions of the edict were confined to "the Catholic Church of the Christians" alone. In the autumn of the same year, when the emperor wrote to the* bishop of Rome, appointing the first council, he defined the established church as "the holy Catholic Church." The following sum- mer, 314, when he called the second council, he referred to the doctrine of the Catholic Church as embodying the "most holy religion." And when it had been decided which party represented this " most holy religion," then in 316 his letter and commission to Cecilianus defined it as "the legitimate and most holy Catholic religion." Nor was this all. While this was going on, also about the year 314, the first edict in favor of Sunday was issued, though it was blended with "Friday." It ordered that on Friday and on Sunday " no judicial or other business should be transacted, but that God should be served with prayers and supplications," and in 321, Friday observance was dropped and Sunday alone was exalted by the famous Sun- day-rest law of Constantirie; all in furtherance of the am- bition of the ecclesiastics to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for themselves. In 323, by the direct and officious aid of the Catholic Church, Constantine succeeded in defeating Licinius and making himself sole emperor. No sooner was this accomplished than the religious liberty as- sured to "the Christians" by the Edict of Milan, like the provisions of the same Edict restoring confiscated property to the Christians, was by a public and express edict limited to Catholics alone. Thus in less than eleven years from the issuing of the Edict of Milan, the Catholic Church stood in full and exclu- A. D. Slil-323 AND 1893. 791 sive possession of the authority of the empire both in the rights of property and the right to worship under the profes- sion of Christianity ; and with a specific and direct commis- sion to use that power and authority to compel the submission of "heretics." Thus was made the papacy the beast of Revelation 13:1-10 and all that ever came in its career from that day to this has been but the natural and inevitable growth of the power and the prerogatives which were then possessed and claimed by the Catholic Church. And it all came from the Edict of Milan bestowing gov- ernmental favors upon "the Christians." No man can fairly deny that in the Edict of Milan and in the religio-political intrigue that lay behind it, there was contained the whole papacy. No man can successfully deny that the Edict of Milan, though appearing innocent enough upon its face, contained the whole papacy, or that the things that followed in the ten years up to 323, which we have sketched, were anything else than the logical and inevitable development of the evil that lay wrapped up in that. Now here is a question that is worthy of the most serious consideration by the American people. If a thing appearing so just and innocent as does the Edict of Milan, could so easily be made to produce such a world of mischief in so short a time, and be a curse to the world forever after, what then can be the result of this decision of the Supreme Court of the United States to tJie same purpose as that, but which has not, in any sense, any appearance of justice or innocence ? Behind this "Christian nation" decision lies an arro- gant and meddling ecclesiastical organization "only anxious to assert the government as a kind of sovereignty for them- selves," and ready to push the arguments and the conclusion of the decision to the utmost limit of their logic, as certainly as there was the same thing behind the Edict of Milan ready and determined to push it to the furthest possible limit in their own favor. And as certainly as the situation here is the same as it was there, so certainly will the same course in 792 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. principle and in practice be followed here as was there, and so certainly the evil results which sprung from that will again appear before the country and before the world. "Old con- troversies which have apparently been hushed for a long time will be revived, and new controversies will spring up ; new and old will commingle, and this will take place right early." And when they do, then, with national prestige and political as well as ecclesiastical power and preferment, the prizes to be contended for, all the bitterness and inten- sity of the old controversies will be revived and manifested, and even intensified. Commotion, strife, violence, persecu- tion, and all the evil accompaniments of an established relig- ion, will afflict and even ruin the nation, even as that former thing afflicted and finally ruined the Roman Empire. This is why Jefferson, Madison, and their wide-awake associates in Virginia, so strongly and persistently opposed the movement to establish "the Christian religion " in that State. This is why they pertinently and forcibly inquired, " Who does not see that the same authority which can estab- lish Christianity, in exclusion of all other religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians in exclusion of all other sects ? " This is why they denounced that bill as " a signal of persecution," as " differing from the Inquisition only in degree," and as "the first step in the career of intolerance," in which the Inquisition is "the last step." This was all true, every word of it. But if this was true of only an attempt to establish the Christian religion, how much more is it true of this decision, which actually es- tablishes the Christian religion as the national religion, and upon "proofs" and "authorities" presented, positively de- clares that " this is -a Christian nation.'" Those wise men, then, "saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle." It is certainly true now, as it was then, that all the consequences are in the principle. And as the principle stands established and justified by the supreme THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE. 793 judicial authority in the nation, so in that all the conse- quences are established and justified. In short, as certainly as in the Edict of Milan there was wrapped up the papacy, just so certainly in this Supreme Court decision there is wrapped up the image of the papacy. And as truly as the issuing of the Edict of Milan was in principle and in embryo the making of the papacy the beast so truly this decision is in principle and in embryo the making of the image of the papacy the image of the beast. Both are described in their career and in their end in Kev. 13 : 1-17 ; 14:9-16; and 19 : 11-21. It is too late now to avoid the consequences by denying the principle, as the principle is already established, and all the consequences are in the principle ; too late, unless the whole people should rise up as one man and reverse this decision, and with one voice repudiate it as it deserves, even in the words in which United States Senator William Pitt Fessenden, denounced the famous Dred Scott decision, as "utterly at variance with all truth, utterly destitute of all legal logic, founded on error, and unsupported by anything resembling argument." 19 For, " The people of these United States are the rightful masters of both congresses and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.' 1 Abraham Lincoln. n The right of the people of the United States to appeal from any action of the government of the United States, when it touches any of their reserved rights, is an inalien- able right. The authority of the government of the United States is delegated, and not absolute. The authority of the govern- ment of the United States is not the supreme authority in the United States, because the people have not delegated all 16 Elaine's "Twenty Years of Congress," vol. i, p. 133. 17 Speech "To the Kentucklans," Cincinnati, Ohio, September, 1859. 794 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. their rights. In the Constitution the people have declared and established that "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The government is but the creature of the Constitution. The people made the Constitution with the delegation only of certain rights to be exercised by the government. Therefore the people are the supreme authority in the United States, and the source of final appeal in all questions of their re- served rights. And "prudent jealousy" in the guardian- ship of these rights against encroachment on the part of the government, is the first duty of American citizens; and relig- ious rights are the chief of all these reserved rights, no less than the chief of all natural rights. The government, being but a creature of the Constitution, is subject to the Constitution. Having been created by the people, through the Constitution, it is bound by the limita- tions prescribed by the people in the Constitution. In the Constitution the people have declared that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." No power concerning religion has been delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor has such power been prohibited by it to the States. All questions, and all matters of religion, therefore, are withheld from the government of the United States, and are reserved and belong exclusively to the States or to the people. As no power concerning religion has been delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States ; as all power and jurisdiction in matters of religion has been reserved exclusively to the States or to the people, it follows that the government has no power or SUCS A DECISION PROHIBITED. 795 authority or jurisdiction in, over, or concerning the subject of religion, and that therefore the Supreme Court of the United States had no authority or right to declare the American people "a religious people," or this nation "a Christian nation." Again : not only has no authority or jurisdiction in matters of religion been delegated to the United States by the Constitution, but all such authority or jurisdiction has actually been prohibited to the United States by the Constitution. 15 Therefore, as all religion, and specifically the Christian religion, is prohibited the government of the United States by the supreme law ; and as the Supreme Court is but a co- ordinate branch of the government of the United States, it follows that the Supreme Court not only had no right or power to declare, but was directly and positively pro- hibited by the supreme law from declaring, the American people "a religious people," or this nation "a Christian nation." And it never can be legitimate for the court to undertake to tell in what sense it used the expression, ; ' This is a Christian Nation," because the court had no shadow of right to use the expression at all. Finally : As the government is but the creature of the supreme law, it is subject to the supreme law, and is bound by the limitations thereof. And though the Supreme Court is the official interpreter of the supreme law, the court itself is bound by the limitations of the supreme law, the Constitution, and must act within the limitations therein set to its powers as a co-ordinate branch of the national government. For any branch of the government to go beyond these limitations, is to take official action without authority, and is therefore usurpation. This is why Madison said, and most truly, that the " least interference " or ''inter- meddling of the general government with religion, would be A MOST FLAGRANT USURPATION." 15 Pages 675, 676 of this book. 796 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. NOTE ON THE DRED SCOTT DECISION. In the preceding discussion, mention has been several times made of the Dred Scott decision and the parallel between it and this "Chris- tian nation '' decision. Space will not permit a full showing of this parallel, but a synopsis may be given. The principle of the Dred Scott decisio*h was the establishment of slavery as a national institution by the meaning of the Constitution. The key-note of the decision which aroused the popular mind, and upon which the popular opposition to the decision was conducted, was the statement that the black man "had no rights which the white man Was bound to respect." To prove this the court cit<'d "historical facts" from "the public history of every European nation," from "the legislation of the different colonies," and from " the plain and unequivo- cal language of the laws of the several States," Massachusetts, Con- necticut, etc. To sustain the proposition, the court also cited " Chan- cellor Kent, whose accuracy and research no one will question." In addition to all this, the court rung in part of the Declaration of Indepen- clence, that "all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," even this was made to support that proposition by the court's declaring that in these words the Declaration did not refer to persons of the African race; that in this the Declaration meant the same as those European, colonial, and State documents. And then the court reached the climax and conclusion of its argument by finding and deciding that the Constitution meant the same as all these other documents meant that the\ T had all one language and one mean- ing. The ground covered was precisely the same as that covered in this "Christian nation " decision, the sources of the "historical facts" were precisely the same as in this, the course of the argument was the same, and the conclusion was reached in the same way that this "Chris- tian nation" conclusion was reached. In the legal and analytical discussion which was carried on over the decision, the keynote was the proposition that "the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." This was a queer proposition to make, in view of the fact that "neither the word ' slave ' nor ' slavery ' is to be found in the Constitution, nor the word 'property ' even, in any connection with language alluding to the tilings slave or slaver}-." But the court made the proposition, and sup- ported it by "argument " built up from the " history of every European nation," the colonies, the several States, Chancellor Kent, and the per- version of the Declaration of Independence; and then upon all this and as the connecting link, deciding that all these other documents and the Constitution have all one language and one meaning; and then from THE DECISIONS OF 1S',G AND LW2. 797 this reaching the grand climax and conclusion tliat " the right of prop- erty in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution," and that persons of the African "race were "so far inferior" to the white race "that they had no rights which a white man was bound to respect; and that a negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit." This all sounds singular enough now, and to some peo- ple it sounded surprisingly singular then; but the Supreme Court of the United States actually made those singular propositions, and rendered its official decision accordingly. And yet that decision and those propositions were no more surprisingly singular, than is in truth this "Christian nation" decision, and in fact hardly so much so as is this; for slavery was not in specific terms excluded from the cognizance of the national authority as is religion, and especially the Christian relig- ion, by the, irordx of the Constitution, and the supreme la/r. Those propositions, the arguments by which in the opinion of the court they were sustained, and the decision which was rendered ac- cordingly, were afiirmed and defended by a large number of people. They were denied and opposed by another large number. Stephen A. Douglas was the champion of the decision and of those who maintained its rightfulness. Abraham Lincoln was the leader of those who denied and opposed the decision, its propositions, and the arguments by which it was sought to be sustained. Those who opposed it were charged by the other side with "resistance to the decision;" were denounced as "the enemies of the Constitution;" as aiming "a deadly blow to our whole representative system of government;" "the enemies of the su- premacy of the laws;" and the foes of governmental order in placing "all our rights and liberties at the mercy of passion, anarchy, and violence." From the history of the making of the Constitution, and from the declarations and express purposes of those who made the Declaration of Independence and the national Constitution, from the plain words and public acts of -Jefferson, Madison, and Washington, the oppo- nents of the decision showed conclusively that the "assumed his- torical facts "cited by the court " were not really true," were really "not facts at all " as used by the court; that the decision was inac- curate in the historical statements cited, and "very much more inac- curate by the suppression of statements that really belong to the history." They therefore maintained that "It is not resistance, it is not factious, it is not even disrespectful, to treat it as not having yet quite established a settled doctrine for the country." They declared, "We think the Dred Scott decision erroneous. We know that the court has overruled its own decisions, and we shall do what we can to have it overrule this. We offer no resistance to it." " Somebody has to reverse that decison, since it was made, and we mean to reverse it, and we mean to do it peaceably." The court did not reverse its decision. 798 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. But in the war, and in the Fourteenth .and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution, THE PEOPLE did reverse that decision. Another argument used by those who supported the decision, and especially by those who really sympathized with it, but who had not the courage openly to take their stand upon it and support it, by which they supported it in all its effects and purposes through seeking to allay all suspicion of it, was by insisting on a distinction Lincoln pro- nounced it a "quibble" between the words "dicta" and "decision." They pleaded that only that portion of the court's discussion that applied directly and definitely to the case of Dred Scott as it was before the court, and that decided Ids status this only was the decision; while all the rest was obiter dicta, mere passing remarks, immaterial, and of no force or authority. This indeed was altogether a quibble ; for the very things that these persons pleaded were dicta only, were the very things wherein lay all the mischief. In that part it was where the arguments were made, the conclusions reached, and the principles recog- nized and established, which threatened all the danger to the country that was seen and feared by the opponents of the decision. And it was upon these very things that Lincoln and his party made their fight from beginning to end. The mere deciding that Dred Scott and his family were slaves, and had no standing in a court of the United States, and must remain slaves, was the smallest part of the decision as compared with the propositions announced and the principle established in the discussion of the question, and which these secret partisans sought to cover up under the quibble that all this was mere dicta. This point is made clear in Lincoln's speech at Columbus, Ohio, September, 1859, in these words: " That decision lays down principles, which, if pushed to their log- ical conclusion, would decide that the constitutions of free States, for- bidding slavery, are themselves unconstitutional. Mark me, I do not say the judges said this, and let no man say I affirm the judges used these words. I only say, It is my opinion that what they did say, if pressed to its logical conclusion, will inevitably result thus. ... So be- lieving, to prevent that incidental consummation is the original and chief purpose of the Republican organization.'' "In my judgment there is no avoiding that result, save the people see that constitutions are better construed than our Constitution is construed in that decision. They must take care that it is more faithfully and truly carried out than it is there expounded. . . . Take it just as it stands-, and apply it as a principle; extend and apply that principle elsewhere, and consider where it will lead you. ... I say, if this principle is established, . . . when this is done, where this doctrine prevails, the miners and sappers will have formed public opinion for the slave-trade. They will then be ready for Jeff. Davis, and Stephens, and other leaders of that company, to sound the bugle for the revival of the slave-trade, for the second Dred Scott decision, for the flood of slavery to be poured over the free States, while we shall be here tied down, and helpless, and run over like sheep." THE DECISIONS OF 1856 AND 1892. 799 The other side confessed that if the principle were admitted, then this result might follow, and to escape this dangerous conclusion, they turned all that part of the decision into mere dicta. This subterfuge Lincoln exposed as follows: " There is no sort of question that the Supreme Court has decided that it is the right of the slave-holder to take his slave and hold him in the territory: and saying this, Judge Douglas himself admits the con- clusion. He says, If this is so, this consequence will follow; and be- cause this consequence would follow, his argument is: ' The decision cannot, therefore, be that way. ... It might be, if it were not for the extraordinary consequences of spoiling my humbug.' " Id. Thus the original organization of the Republican party; the political campaign in which Lincoln was made president of the United States; the four years' war of the Rebellion; and the Fourtee-nth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution the whole of this ten years of the most critical history of the nation was carried through upon that part of the Dred Scott decision, and the logic of that part of the decis- ion, which in the quibble was pronounced mere dicta and not pertinent nor material to the question in issue before the court. And this same quibble between the words "dicta" and "decision" is now sought to be established by the sympathizers with a religious despotism, as a valid distinction with reference to this "Christian nation " decision. And this with the purpose of silencing opposition to it. And when this is done, where this doctrine prevails, the miners and sappers will have formed public opinion for a religious despotism. They will then be ready for Gibbons, Ireland, McAllister, George, and other leaders of that companyto sound the bugle for a revival of religious despotism, for the second Christian nation decision, for the flood of persecution to be poured over the nation, while we shall be here tied down, and help- less, and run over like sheep. This is the situation to-day under this decision as certainly as it was the situation in 1859 under the Dred Scott decision. So that as a matter of fact there is not only .a complete parallel between the argument, the proofs, the conclusion, and the principle of the Dred Scott decision and those of this "Chris- tian nation" decision; but there is also a complete parallel between the position and the course of the sympathizers with the Dred Scott decision and the position and course of the sympathizers with this "Christian nation " decision. As certainly as the principle recognized and established in the Dred Scott decision carried in it the fact and all the consequences of the civil despotism which Abraham Lincoln clearly saw and uncompromisingly opposed, so certainly in principle this "Christian nation " decision car- ries in itself the fact and all the consequences of the religious despot- ism in the living likeness of the f>apacy, which we have pointed out, which we clearly see, and which we uncompromisingly oppose. And 59 800 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. in our opposition to this we say with Abraham Lincoln in his opposi- tion to that, "We have to fight this battle upon principle, and upon principle alone. . . . So I hope those with whom I am surrounded have principle enough to nerve themselves for the task, and leave nothing undone that can fairly be done, to bring about the right result. "- Speech, at Springfield, III., July 17, 1858. There is another point in parallel that is well worth noticing, though it is only indirectly connected with the Ured Scott Decision. Lincoln always insisted that the repeal of the Missouri Compromise was to establish a principle to be used in the future for "the planting of slavery wherever in the wide world local and unorganized opposition could not prevent it ; " and therefore earnestly advocated its restora- tion. Yet he said, "Some men, . . . who condemn the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, nevertheless hesitate to go for its restoration, lent they be thrown in company with THE ABOLITIONIST." The other side also diligently used this argument as a scarecrow to prevent as many as possible of the timid ones from acting upon their real convictions. Even so now there are many people who in principle and from con- viction are opposed to this "Christian nation " decision, and all the purposes of this combination to secure national religious legislation and the full establishment of a religious despotism ; yet they hesitate to act openly and positively in opposition lest they be thrown in company icitJi THE ADVENTISTS. And those who are urging on this religious despotism are diligently using this argument to prejudice the idea of opposition beforehand, and as a scarecrow to frighten the timid ones. Lincoln's words to those persons in that day are ours to these in this day: "Will they allow me to tell them, good-humoredly, that I think this [hesitation to show their opposition] is very silly. STAND WITH ANYBODY THAT STANDS RIGHT. Stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. ... To desert such ground because of any company ... is to be less than a man less than an American." Speech, at Peoria, III., October 10, 1854. And on this question, before us to-day, to desert such ground becauSe of any company, is to be less than a man less than an American less than a Christian. CHAPTER XXVIII. THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. IT is not only too late to avoid the consequences of that "Christian nation 1 ' decision by denying the principle, because the principle is established, and all the consequences are in the principle ; but it is even more than doubly too late, because the consequences of the principle have already be- come a fixture in the legislative precedents and procedure of the nation. The great religious combination for political purposes whose history we have traced in Chapters XXV and XXVI, has already seized upon it and made it to do service in se- curing what the National Reform Association has always been aiming at, that is, the establishment of Sunday as the national Sabbath. This is the one thing that they had in view above all other things, in their efforts to obtain an amendment to the Constitution declaring this a Christian nation. And when the Supreme Court unanimously de- clared that "this is a Christian nation" even now, and that this is the "meaning" of the Constitution as it is now, they were only too glad to have and to use this decision as the basis of their demand upon Congress that Sunday should be set up as the national Sabbath by an act of the national legislature. One of the very first uses that was ever made of that "Christian nation" decision was when, in the month of April, 1892, the president of the American Sabbath Union took it in his hand, and went before committees of the [801] 802 TUB CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. United States Senate and House of Representatives, recited its '"argument," and demanded the closing of the World's Fair on Sunday, by Congress, "because this is a Christian nation." The Pearl of Days, the official organ of the American Sabbath Union, May 7, 1892, arguing for Sunday legis- lation by Congress, said that this decision 'Establishes clearly the fact that our government is Christian. Tim decision is vital to tlie Sunday question in nil its aspects, and places that question among the most important issues now before the American people. . . . And this important decision rests upon the fundamental principle that religion is imbedded in the organic structure of the American government a religion that recognizes, and is bound to main- tain, Sunday as a day for rest and worship." The Christian Statesman, which has always been the offi- cial organ of the National Reform Association, and which was then the mouthpiece of the whole combination, in the is- sue of May 21, 1892, said : - " 'Christianity is the law of the land.' 'This is a Christian nation.' - U. 8. Supreme Court, February 20, 1802. The Christian church, therefore, has rights in this country. Among these is the right to one day in seven protected from the assaults of greed, the god of this world, that it may be devoted to worship of the God of heaven and earth." From December, 1888, to December, 1891, the National Reform combination had tried repeatedly to secure the pas- sage of some sort of bill by Congress, requiring the observ- ance of Sunday. They knew that any such act of Congress would be unconstitutional. The leading National Reformers had so declared continuously for more than twenty-five years. But that made no difference to them, they were de- termined to have it, even though it were unconstitutional. They tried to secure it by a national bill, and failed. They then tried to secure it by a bill relating only to the District of Columbia, in order that if successful they might use this as a lever to secure the passage of their coveted national law. "PETITIONING" BY THREATS. 803 But in this also they failed. They desired the recognition of the principle of religion in legislation by Congress ; and they cared not in what shape it might be brought about, nor how slightly the principle was recognized, just so it was done. As one of their number told congressional committees and the public repeatedly : " We will take a quarter of a loaf, half a loaf, or a whole loaf. If the government should do noth- ing more than forbid the opening of the post-offices at church hours, it would be a national tribute to the value of religion, and would lead to something more satisfactory." Having repeatedly failed to get what they wanted, by di- rect legislation, they welcomed the proposition of a con- gressional appropriation in aid of the World's Columbian Exposition, as the means of securing indirectly that which they had failed to accomplish directly. They therefore unanimously declared in favor of a governmental appropri- ation of $5,000,000 in aid of the Exposition, but coupled in- separably with the provision that the gates of the Exposition should be closed on "the Lord's day," " the Christian Sab- bath," "the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday." They first petitioned Congress according to this scheme ; but as Congress seemed to be slow in responding, they soon pro- ceeded to add threats to their "petitions." And these threats were of such a nature that more than one of the Sena- tors openly in the Senate rebuked them as "an abuse of the right of petition." This however did not cause those "petitioners" to cease their threats. The National Reform Bureau, whose head- quarters were at Pittsburg, Pa., sent out to pulpits all over the land, a form of threatening resolution to be adopted by the respective churches, and. sent up to the senators and rep- resentatives in Congress. And here is a true copy of that threatening resolution : " Resolved, That we do hereby pledge ourselves and each other, that we will from this time henceforth refuse to vote for or support for any 804 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. office or position of trust, any member of Congress, either senator or representative, who shall vote for any further aid of any kind to the World's Fair, except on conditions named in these resolutions." l This particular resolution was sent up by certain Presby- terian churches of the State of New York ; but with slight variations, or none at all, the like resolution was sent up by different churches throughout the country. And in all cases the "conditions named" were that the gates of the Exposi- tion should be closed on "the Sabbath," "the Christian Sabbath," or "the Lord's day," according as different churches chose differently to express their thought as to the best name for Sunday. Under the influence of these resolutions, the Congress of the United States surrendered to the dictate of the churches, and did for them what the leaders and lobbyists of this com- bination knew to be an unconstitutional thing. And the matter was treated by Congress in such a way as to preclude the charitable supposition that the members did not know that it was unconstitutional, even though its unconstitu- tionally had not been definitely pointed out to them. The question was treated as religious and religious only. It is true that the Expotition was not closed all the time on Sunday (it was closed three or four Sundays); but this does not affect the action of Congress. Besides, in the cases and decisions of the courts by which the Exposition was opened on Sunday, the question of the constitutionality or unconstitutionally of the action of Congress was not con- sidered at all. The whole procedure was on other points exclusively. The non-enforcement of an act of Congress, or any other law, does not affect the act itself. As a matter of legislation, therefore, and of fact, this action of Congress stands just as though the Exposition had been closed all the time. That particular phase of the subject which produced the legislation to close the "World's Columbian Exposition on Sun- 1 Congressional fiecord, May 25, 1892, page 5144. A SENATORIAL THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSION. 805 day, was introduced in the United States Senate by Senator Quay, July 10, 1892. He did it by offering an amendment to the appropriation bill, requiring that provision should be made " by the proper authority for the closing of the Expo- sition on the Sabbath day." With this he also sent up to the secretary of the Senate a Bible with the fourth com- mandment marked in brackets, and had that commandment read by the secretary as giving the reasons for this legisla- tion. This introduced the legislation with a positive relig- ious character, and this idea was never forsaken from begin- ning to end. The chaplain of the Senate, who took an active interest in the matter throughout, said of the discus- sion in the Senate : "During this debate you might have imagined yourself in a general council or assembly or synod or conference, so pronounced was one Senator after another." a As these are all ecclesiastical terms, it is evident that in the mind of the chaplain, the Senate, for this occasion at least, had transformed itself into an ecclesiastical body. Nor indeed is the chaplain alone in this view ; from the speeches as they appear in the Congressional Record, it is plain that some at least of the senators were impressed with this notion too. Senator Hawley said : "Everybody knows what the foundation is. It is founded in relig- ious belief." And Senator Peffer said of it : "To-day we are engaged in a theological discussion concerning the observance of the first day of the week." As Senator Colquitt was a National Reformer of years' standing, nothing else was to be expected of him, and he fully sustained this character in his speech, about half of which was made up from extracts from a sermon by Father Hya- cinthe, Old Roman Catholic of France. The rest of his a New York Independnit, July 28, 1892. 806 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. speech was National Reform sentiment of his own manafact- ure. Altogether it was of such a sort that he himself began to see how incongruous it was in that place, and halted with these words : " But I shall continue this no farther, Mr. President, for it may to some sound like cant, like preaching, as though we were undertaking to clothe ourselves in over-righteous habiliments, and pretend to be better than other men." 3 In speaking further, Senator Hawley greatly regretted that he was not enough of an ecclesiastic to do justice to the subject, and exclaimed : "I wish, Mr. President, that I were the most eloquent clergyman, the most eloquent of those staunch old sturdy divines who have honored American citizenship, as well as American Christianity, that I might give something more than this feeble expression of my belief in the serious importance of this vote." 5 And because he could not have his wish to be, for the occasion, "the most eloquent clergymen," " the most elo- quent of those staunch old sturdy divines " (such as John Cotton, and John Davenport, and Cotton Mather, perhaps), he did what evidently he counted the next best thing, and presented the views of Archbishop Ireland, Archbishop Gross, and Archbishop Riordan, of the Catholic Church, all the bishops of the Episcopalian Church, and most, if not all, the bishops of the Methodist Episcopal Church, both North and South. This is evidence enough to demonstrate that the question was treated altogether and consciously as a religious or ecclesiastical one. It is in order, and it is important too, now to present the evidence that this constitutionally for- bidden question was taken up and considered and acted upon, out of deference to the demands and threats of the combined churches. 3 Congressional Record, Fifty-second Congress, p. 6755. 5 Congressional Record, July 12, 1892, p. 6700. THE WORDS OF THE SURRENDER. 807 In the Senate, the two most influential advocates of the measure were Senators Hawley and Hiscock. And Senator Hiscock set forth the matter thus : ; "If I had charge of this amendment in the interest of the Columbian Exposition, I would icrite tfie provision for the closure in any form that the religious sentiment of the country demands, and not stand here hesitating or quibbling about it. Rather than let the public sentiment against the Exposition being opened on Sunday be re-enforced by the opposition in the other house against any legislation of this kind in the interest of the Exposition, I say to the junior senator from Illinois [Mr. Palmer], he would better yield to this sentiment, and not let it go out to the country that there is the slightest doubt that if this money shall be appropriated, the Exposition will be closed on Sunday. ... If I were interested in this measure, as I might be interested if it were located in my own State, / should make this closure provision satisfactory to those petitioners who have memorialized us against the desecration of the Lord's day. ... I would not leave it uncertain whether the government might engage in business or not upon the Sabbath day." 6 Senator Vest, though professedly speaking for an open Fair, was constrained to say : "If I abhorred anything, it would be any public act of mine which would say to the honest, religious people of the United States, ' I am pre- pared to flout your opinions, to entirely disregard them, and to stamp upon them my disapprobation by giving a vote directly in conflict with what you have asked.'" 7 Senator Hawley, however, was the most outspoken of all. He first stated that "there are more than 13,000,000 people recorded as members of churches in the United States." He then added to these "attendants," "asso- ciates," and "sympathizers," "who go to church or send their wives and children, and subscribe for it, and have a profound respect for it, whether they believe in it or not," and thus he made up the number of "from forty to fifty mill- ions," who "have more or less of religious profession or 6 Congressional Record, July 13, 1892, p. 6755. 7 /d., July 12, p. 6697. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison would have said it. They did say it in their day. 808 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. sympathy " in this country, and then upon all this argued thus : "There is no use in endeavoring to escape responsibility. If the Senate to-day decides that it will not close that Exposition on Sunday, the Exposition will be opened on that day, and you will have offended more than 40,000,000 of people seriously and solemnly offended them. No wise statesman and monarch of modern times, no satrap of Rome, would have thought it wise to fly in the face of a profound conviction of the people he governed, no matter if he thought it a profound error. It is not wise statesmanship to do it. . . . Now, if gentlemen repudiate this, if they desire to reject it, if they deny that this is in the true sense of the word a religious nation, I should like to see the disclaimer put in white and black, and proposed by the Congress of the United States. Write it. How would you write it ? How would you deny that from the foundation of the country, through every fiber of their being, this people has been a religious people ? Word it, if you dare ; advocate it, if you dare. How MANY WHO VOTED FOR IT WOULD EVER COME BACK HERE AGAIN? None, I hope." 8 It was the same way in the House. A dispatch from Washington to the Chicago Daily Post, April 9, 1892, gave the following from an interview with a member of the House Committee on the World's Fair : "The reason we shall vote for it is, I will confess to you, a fear that unless we do so, the church folks will get together and knife us at the polls ; and well you know we all want to come back, and we can''t afford to take any risks." "Do you think it will pass the House ?" "Yes; and the Senate too. We are all in the same boat. lam sorry for those in charge of the Fair ; but self-preservation is the first law of nature, and that is all there is about it." At this subservient attitude of Congress, the Sunday-law managers chuckled with great satisfaction. In the Union Signal, October 20, 1892, there was published an editorial interview with Joseph Cook, on Congress and Sunday- closing of the World's Fair, in which occurs the following passage from Mr. Cook : " In Boston the first question asked a stranger is, ' Have you written a book ? ' in New York, ' How much are you worth ? ' in Chicago, ' How 8 Congressional Record, July 12, 1892, p. 6700, and July 13, p. 6759. "THE SABBATH DAT." 809 much do you expect to be worth ?' in Washington, 'Do you hope to be re-elected?' The American people have convinced Congress that this latter question is of great and growing importance in connection with votes on Sunday-closing." And so the threats of the churches were not in vain. For fear that they could not "come back here again," United States senators and representatives in Congress violated the Constitution ; entered the field of religion ; discussed a religious question ; committed the government of the United States to the decision of a religious contro- versy ; and assumed the prerogative of interpreter of the di- vine law for the people of the United States. That this may be seen the more clearly, let us look again at the official proceedings. There we find the following ac- count : " Mr. Quay. On page 122, line 13, after the word 'act,' I move to insert, ' and that provision has been made by the proper authority for the closing of the Exposition on the Sabbath day.' "The reasons for the amendment I will send to the desk to be read. The secretary will have the kindness to read from the Book of Law I send to the desk, the part enclosed ia brackets. " The Vice- President. The part indicated will be read. "The secretary read as follows : " ' Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy ; six days shall thou labor and do all thy work ; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God ; in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates ; for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day ; wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.'" 10 The foregoing is all that was said or done in relation to the question that day. The next legislative day, however, the question was taken up and discussed. The debate was opened by Senator Manderson, of Nebraska, who used the following language : "The language of this amendment is, that the Exposition shall be closed on the 'Sabbath day.' I submit that if the senator from Pennsyl- 10 Congressional Record, July 10, 1892, p. 6614. 810 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. vania desires that the Exposition shall be closed upon Sunday, this lan- guage will not necessarily meet that idea. . . . " The word ' Sabbath day ' simply means that it is a rest day, and it may be Saturday or Sunday, and it would be subject to the discretion of those who will manage this Exposition, whether they should close the Exposition on the last day of the week, in conformity with that observ- ance which is made by the Israelites and the Seventh-day Baptists, or should close it on the first day of the week, generally known as the Christian Sabbath. It certainly seems to me that this amendment should be adopted by the senator from Pennsylvania, and, if he proposes to close this Exposition, that it should be closed on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday. . . . ''Therefore I offer an amendment to the amendment, which I hope may be accepted by the senator from Pennsylvania, to strike out the words 'Exposition on the Sabbath day,' and insert 'mechanical portion of the Exposition on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.' . . . "Mr. Quay. I will accept the modification so far as it changes the phraseology of the amendment proposed by me in regard to designating the day of the week on which the Exposition shall be closed. " The Vice- President. The senator from Pennsylvania accepts the modification in part, but not in whole. . . . "Mr. Harris. Let the amendment of the senator from Pennsyl- vania, as modified, be reported. " The Vice- President. It will be again reported. " TJie Chief Clerk. On page 122, line 13, after the word 'act,' it is proposed to amend the amendment of the committee by inserting, " ' And that provision has been made by the proper authority for the closing of the Exposition on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.' " u This amendment was afterward further amended by the insertion of the proviso that the managers of the Exposition should sign an agreement to close the Fair on Sunday before they could receive any of the appropriation ; but this which we have given is the material point. All of this the House confirmed in its vote, accepting the Senate amendments. Besides this, the House had already, on its own part, by a vote of 131 to 36, decided that Sunday 11 Id., July 12, 1892, pp. 6694, 6695, 6701. CONGRESS INTERPRETS THE BIBLE. 811 is the " Christian Sabbath ; " and by a vote of 149 to 11 that the seventh day is not the Sabbath. And thus did the Con- gress of the United States, at the dictate of the churches, not only take sides in a religious controversy, and discuss and decide a religious question, but put itself in the place, and assumed to itself the prerogative of authoritative interpreter of the divine law ; for, from the official record of the proceed- ings, there appear these plain facts : 1. The divine law was officially and in its very words adopted as containing the "reasons" and forming the basis of the legislation. In other words, the legislation proposed only to enforce the divine law as quoted from the Book. 2. Yet those to whom the legislation was directed, and who were expected to execute its provisions, were riot al- lowed to read and construe the divine law for themselves, and this for the very reason that there was a possibility that they might take the divine word as it reads, and as it was actually quoted in the official proceedings, and shut the Exposition on the day plainly specified in the divine word, which was cited as the basis and authority for the action taken. 3. Therefore, to preclude any such possibility, Congress assumed the prerogative of official and authoritative inter- preter of the divine law, and declared that ik the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday," is the Sabbath of the fourth commandment of the divine law that " the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday," is the meaning of the w r ord of the Lord which says, ' ' The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God." This is what the Congress of the United States has done, and, in the doing of it, has violated every rule and every principle that governs in the interpretation of law. A lead- ing rule for the interpretation of law, is this : " In the case of all law, it is the intent of the lawgiver that is to be enforced." 812 THE CONSPIRA CT 8 UCCEEDS. CONCL UDED. What, then, was the intent of the Lawgiver when the Sabbath commandment was given ? Did the Lawgiver de- clare, or show in any way, his intention? He did. He declared in plain words that the seventh day is the one in- tended to be observed. Nor did he leave them to decide for themselves which day they would have for the Sabbath. He did not leave it to the people to interpret his law for themselves, nor to interpret it at all. By three special acts every week, kept up continuously for forty years, the Lord showed his intent in the law. The people were fed on the manna in their forty years' wanderings between Egypt and Canaan ; but on the seventh day of the week no manna ever fell. On the sixth day of the week there was a double por- tion, and that which was gathered on the sixth day would keep over the seventh day, which it could not be made to do on any other day of the week. By this means the Law- giver signified his intent upon the subject of the day men- tioned in the law quoted by Congress, and by keeping it up so continuously, and for so long a time, he made it impos- sible for the people then to mistake his intent, and has left all future generations who have the record of it, without ex- cuse in gathering anything else as his intent than that the seventh day is the Sabbath. Therefore, when Congress decided that "the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday," is the meaning of the divine law which says "the seventh day is the Sabbath," it plainly set itself in contra- diction to the word and intent of the Most High. Another established rule is this : "When words are plain in a written law, there is an end to all con- struction ; they must be followed." And, "Where the intent is plain, nothing is left to construction." Are the words of this commandment, quoted by Con- gress, plain words? They are nothing else. There is not an obscure nor an ambiguous word in the whole command- ment. Then, under the rule there is no room for any con- CONGRESS AGAINST THE WORD OF GOD. 813 struction ; much less is there room for any such construction as would make the expression "the seventh day" mean "the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday. 7 ' Fitting to the point, the New Testament has given us an instructive and important piece of narrative. In Mark 16:1, 2, are these words : "And when the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Salome, had brought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him. And very early in the morning, the first day of week, they came unto the sepulcher at the rising of the sun." These people arose very early in the morning of the first day of the week ; yet the Sabbath was past. Now Congress legislated to secure respect for the Sabbath on "the first day of the week." Such a thing can never be done, how- ever, because Inspiration has declared that the Sabbath is past before the first day of the week comes. It matters not how early our illustrious and devout Congress or anybody else may get out and around "on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday," they will be too late to find the Sabbath there, for the Lord says that then it is "past." And it is the Sabbath according to the commandment, too, that is'past when the first day of the week comes the Sabbath according to this very commandment which Con- gress has officially cited. Here is the record : " And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments ; and rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment. Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepul- cher, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them. And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulcher. And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus." Luke 23 : 56 ; 24 : 1-3. Here is the plain word of the Lord, stating plainly and proving conclusively that "the Sabbath day " according to the very commandment which Congress has officially cited, is the day before "the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday," and that the Sabbath day according to this 814 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. commandment is past before "the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday," comes at all, no matter how early they may get up the first day of the week. It is true that the churches are at the head of all this, and that Congress did it at the dictation and under the threats of the churches. It is true that the churches have put this false interpretation upon the commandment, and then saddled it off thus upon Congress. This is all true, but that does not relieve Congress from one whit of the guilt of perverting the law of the Most High, of forcing into that law a meaning that was never intended to be there, and of putting itself in the place of God and assuming the office of interpreter of his laws. Congress had no business to allow itself to be forced into such a position. An eminent law writer and legal authority has justly observed that "A court or legislature which should allow a change of public sen- timent to influence it in giving to a written constitution a construction not warranted by the intention of its founders, would be justly charge- able with reckless disregard of official oath and public duty." 12 The theologians gave to the Sabbath commandment a construction which was not in any sense warranted by the intention of the Author of the commandment. They then went to Congress and demanded with threats that it allow itself to be influenced by these theological sentiments and political threats, to give to the written Constitution of the government of the living God a construction which is not in any sense warranted by the intention of the Founder of that Constitution. And our national Legislature did allow this sentiment to influence it into doing that very thing. Such a thing done to a human constitution, an earthly statute, being justly chargeable to reckless disregard of official oath and public duty, what must be chargeable against such an action with reference to the divine Constitu- tion and the heavenly law ? The national Legislature, the Congress of the United States, has allowed the churches to 12 Cooley, " Constitutional Limitations," p. 67. THE SUBJECTION OF THE PEOPLE. 815 draw it into the commission of an act with reference to the Constitution and laws of the living God, which, if done only with the laws of men, would be reckless disregard of official oath and public duty. And both Congress and the churches are without excuse in the doing of it. By this legislation, at the dictate of the churches, Con- gress has distinctly and definitely put itself and the gov- ernment of the United States into the place where it has established, and proposed to enforce, the observance of an institution as sacred, and as due to the Lord, which not only the Losd has neither established nor required, but which is directly contrary to the plain word of the Lord upon the subject of this very institution, and its observance as due to the Lord. And in the doing of this, Congress has also been caused to assume to itself the prerogative of authoritative interpreter of the Scriptures for the people of the land, and for all who come into the land, and has put itself in the place of God, by authoritatively deciding that an observance established and required by the State, and which it calls the Lord's, is the Lord's indeed, although the Lord plainly declares the contrary. In thus submitting to the dictates of the churches, and making itself the official and authoritative mouthpiece for the theological definitions and interpretations of the divine law, the Congress of the United States has given over the government of the United States into the hands of the com- bined churches. A forcible American writer has long ago stated the principle thus : - "To permit a church any church . . . to dictate, beforehand, what laws should or should not be passed, would be to deprive the peo- ple of all the authority they have retained in their own hands, and to make such church the governing power, instead of them." 1S This is precisely what has been done before the eyes of the people of the tTnited States in this Sunday legislation of the Fifty-second Congress. The combined "evangelical " 13 Hon. Richard W. Thompson, '-The Papacy and the Civil Power," p. 45. 60 816 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. churches, joined with the Catholic Church, as a united body on this question, did dictate under threats that this law should be passed. Congress did permit it, and did yield to the dictation, and in so doing, it did deprive the people of the governmental authority which they had retained in their own hands by the Declaration and the Constitution, and did make the churches the governing power in the government instead of the people. " Government of the people, by the people, and for the people," is gone, and there has been established, in its stead, the subjection of tJie people by the churches and for the churches. And under the mistaken notion that he was pledged to maintain the government of the United States, rather than the Constitution of the United States, President Benjamin Harrison approved this unconstitutional procedure on the part of Congress. 14 Thus in the year- A. D. 1892, the government of the United States, by specific official acts of the three depart- ments the Judiciary, the Legislative, and the Executive of which that government is composed, was turned from the " New Order of Things " to which it was committed by our Revolutionary Fathers, and to which it stands pledged by the 14 This is a fact. In a personal interview with the author of this book, the reason (?) and the only reason which he gave., for approving this legislation, was that it was " part of the general appropriation bill for the running expenses of the government; that to disapprove, this he would have to disapprove the whole bill ; and if that were done, all the machinery of the government would have to stop, and the whole government itself be brought to a standstill." This, too, while admitting that if this Sunday legislation had come before him separated from other legislation, so that it might be considered upon its merits alone, the result might be different. This was nothing else than to argue that he was re- sponsible for the maintenance of the government. But this was altogether a mistake. The maintenance of the government devolves altogether upon Con- gress. And if the president were to veto a general appropriation bill because of an unconstitutional piece of legislation which had been tacked to it; and If the whole government should in consequence be brought Indeed to a standstill, he would be no more responsible for it than would any private citizen. President Harrison's assumption, therefore, was altogether a mistaken one, and this plea wholly irrelevant. " THE VOICE OF RELIGION." 817 Great Seal of the government itself, and was thrown into the evil tide of the old order of things. And thus this en- lightened nation, the example and glory of the world, was caused to assume the place and the prerogatives of the gov- ernments of the Middle Ages in embodying in the law the dogmas and definitions of the theologians, and executing the arbitrary and despotic will of the church. As we have seen, the Legislative branch, the law-making power, of the government not only acted a most responsible part in -this evil-laden thing, but openly confessed and pub- licly announced that it did so, and that it did not "dare" to do otherwise. This, too, the church power was quick to see and prompt to boast of. As soon as the Senate had passed the measure, even before the House had agreed to it, "Rev." J. D. Sands, of the Seventh United Presbyterian Church, Pittsburg, Penn., seizes the occasion to declaim from his pulpit in a sermon preached July 17, 1892, as follows : "That the church has weight with great political or governing bodies has been demonstrated most effectually in the late World's Fail- matter, when the United States Senate, the highest body in the country, listened to the voice of religion, and passed the World's Fair $5,000,(XK) appropriation bill with the church instituted proviso that the gates of the great Exposition should not be opened upon Sunday. That grand, good fact suggests to the Christian's mind that if this may be done, so may other equally needful measures. The church is gaining power con- tinually, and its voice will be Jieard in the future much oftener than in the past." And the Christian Statesmen, October 1, 1892, cele- brating the twenty-fifth anniversary of its founding for this very purpose, joyfully exclaimed : "The forty millions in the Christian homes of the land, the ruling majority when they assert themselves, have won at least one great moral victory in each of the recent sessions of Congress. . . . The Sabbath - closing victory with which the quarter century closes, shows the way to others that will make the nineteenth century go out in glory eight years hence. For the great Christian majority lias learned, by response to its great petition, and its host of letters with reference to the World's Fair, 818 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. that it can have of national and State governments whatever legislation against immorality it will ask unitedly and earnestly." It was not long before they had an opportunity to "assert themselves" again. For no sooner had this act of religious legislation been done than a movement was set on foot to have it undone. Men who had all along declared that no such thing would ever be done ' ' in this enlightened land," and especially under a Constitution prohibiting it, were compelled to admit that just such a thing had been done "in this enlightened land," and in spite of a Constitu- tion that prohibited it. They who before had refused to take any part in opposing the movement because there was "no danger of such a thing ever being done," were ready to op- pose it with all their might, after it had been done. The Seventh-day Adventists had been uncompromisingly opposed to this movement in all its phases and in all its pur- poses from its very beginning. Accordingly, as soon as the first measure for religious legislation was introduced in Congtess, by Senator Blair in 1888, they took steps to coun- teract it as far as possible. Accordingly, they circulated a petition which was in effect, and was intended to be, a remonstrance against anything of Jthe kind forever. That petition runs as follows : " To the Honorable, the Senate of the United States [Duplicate to the House of Representatives] : "We, the undersigned, adult residents of the United States, twenty- one years of age or more, hereby respectfully, but earnesly petition your Honorable Body not to pass any bill in regard to the observance of the Sabbath, or the Lord's day, or any other religious or ecclesiastical institu- tion or rite ; nor to favor in any way the adoption of any resolution for the amendment of the national Constitution, that would in any way tend, either directly or indirectly, to give preference to the principles of any religion or of any religious body above another, or that will in any way sanction legislation upon the subject of religion ; but that the total separation between religion and the State, assured by the national Con- stitution as it now is, may forever remain as our fathers established it." THOSE WHO PROTESTED. 819 To this petition, or remonstrance, they obtained more than three hundred and fifty thousand bona-fide individual signatures. By these and hearings before congressional committees the Blair legislation was delayed till it died, and the Breckinridge bill was defeated. When the demand was made that Congress should close the World's Columbian Exposition on Sunday, this too was opposed with the former protest, and with the following one direct : "We, the undersigned, citizens of the United States, hereby respect- fully, but decidedly, protest against the Congress of the United States committing the United States government to a union of religion and the State, in the passage of any bill or resolution to close the World's Colum- bian Exposition on Sunday, or in any other way committing the govern- ment to a course of religious legislation." While these petitions were being circulated, many peo- ple were found who would not allow that the cause was of sufficient importance to justify them in taking the time even to write their names to a protest, even though they were in full harmony with the protest in itself. These men said : "I am in favor of what that says, as much as you are; but it is all nonsense to be circulating such a thing as that for signatures to be sent to Congress. Although I agree with it all, I would not take the time to sign my name to it. There is not the least danger that any such thing as that protests against, will ever be done. You would better go home and spend your time at more profitable business." And just because so many people were so sure that it never would be done, it was done. One member of Congress in response to one of these petitions that had been sent to him to be presented, said that if any such measure as this op- posed were ever proposed in Congress, he did not "believe that there could be found a dozen members in the House who would favor it." And just three weeks from the day that he wrote this letter, the question came to a vote in the 820 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. House of Representatives, and this gentleman saw more than a dozen dozen men vote for it. Then the unbelieving ones awoke to the fact that they had mistaken the importance of the issue, and immediately set out to retrieve this mistake by making another, they Demanded that the Exposition should be opened on Sunday by act of Congress. This was only to ask for further relig- ious legislation ; because Congress had no more right to say that the Exposition should be opened on Sunday than it had to say that it should be closed on that day. Those who had been protesting all the time against letting Congress have anything to do with the question in any way whatever, insisted that now Congress should simply undo what it had done, that it should repeal its Sunday legisla- tion, because of its unconstitutionality , thus putting the gov- ernment back in harmony with the Constitution on its own part, and leaving the matter of Sunday observance, with all other religious matters, to the States or to the people where the Constitution itself placed it. Any question of the full propriety of the legislation, however, gave to the church managers their coveted oppor- tunity further to "assert themselves." And they did it to the utmost of their power, and in the same way as at the first by threats of the "boycott" and whatever else they could bring to bear. And as in the first instance, so in this, Congress yielded to the requirements of the combined churches, instead of to the requirements of the Constitution. This, too, for religious reasons, which alone were urged, and which were supported by frequent reference to the Su- preme Court decision that " this is a Christian nation." A hearing was held at Washington City, January 10-13, 1893, before the House Committee on Columbian Exposition, at which were present leading representatives of the whole National Reform- American Sabbath Union combination, the Evangelical Alliance, and the Young People's Society of Christian Endeavor. There were present also representa- THE CONSTITUTION EXCLUDED. 821 lives of those who wanted the Exposition opened by act of Congress ; and of those who were and always had been un- compromisingly opposed to letting Congress have anything to do with the question one way or the other. About sixty speeches in all were made. All argument, however, based on the unconstitutionality of the original legislation was positively excluded, 15 while arguments based upon religion and religion only, in consideration of "heavenly things'" and to the exclusion of "earthly things," were heard for hours. The president of the American Sabbath Union opened the discussion on that side with words as follows : "I approach this subject with great reverence. When we come to deal with heavenly things, we should put aside earthly things, and should do very much as the Jews used to do in the temple at Jerusalem ; before they made their offerings, before they entered upon the service, they pre- pared themselves by ablution and by prayer for the proper discharge of their duties. Now when we come to consider the Sabbath, that it rests upon the law of God, that it is a revelation to mankind which no one would have thought of, that we owe it entirely to our Father which is in heaven, we ought therefore to come with the same reverential spirit to its consideration ourselves. . . . We represent the Christian sentiment of the United States of America. . . . "We hope that Congress will maintain its dignity. We have re- solved not to say one single word as to the constitutionality or unconsti- tutionality of this law before this committee ; for to claim that it is unconstitutional here would be a reflection upon the committee, upon both Houses of Congress, and upon the president of the United States who approved this law. And you yourself very wisely took that last consideration entirely out from before the committee, when you stated this was not the place to argue that question. Therefore we dismiss it without saying a single word. . . . "When our blessed Lord was incarnate in Palestine, he approved and magnified that law, saying, ' I come not to destroy, but to fulfill. And then he gives another point on the Sabbath, which was, that the 'Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath ;' and that 'the Son of man,' our Lord, 'is Lord also of the Sabbath.' In other words, it is a part of his patrimony, given to him by our Father who is in heaven, and every one who attempts to cut it off in any way, robs Jesus himself. . . . 15 See " Captivity of the Republic," p. 34. 822 THE CON8PIRA CY S UCCEEDS. CONCL UD ED. "And on the other hand, when we talk of elevating the people and lifting them up higher, can we get any higher principle, or any higher method of doing this, than that which was adopted by our blessed Lord himself ? Not at all. And is it not rather to be thought that these people icho are especially consecrated to the service of God, are better able, through their consecration, and through their education, to inculcate what will best elevate the people, than those who are ignorant of that sort of connection, and approach the subject from a lower and entirely different standpoint? "Now this day we are to present to you in brief speeches, the senti- ments of the Christian Church and common people of the United States in the various branches of that church, and without any further intro- duction, I will ask that the roll should now be taken up." 16 This was followed by many others of the same tenor, in which the committee and Congress were exhorted as in the presence of death and in view of the judgment to " stand by the side, and to the "preservation, of God's holy day ; " and were warned that "if we touch that fourth commandment, God will bring a curse upon us as a nation." 17 The result of this hearing, and the situation as it stood at the close of the hearing, was reported from Washington to the Chicago Herald the day that the hearing was ended January 13. And everybody who was at the Capitol at that time can certify to the absolute correctness of the re- port. Here is the material portion of it : " The churches and the ministers are at work again quite as ear- nestly as they were a year ago, and with equal effectiveness. While there was no doubt a month ago that if a vote could have been taken upon the question of Sunday opening at once, a comfortable majority would have been found in both houses of Congress for opening, it is not now likely that the Durborow resolution can be carried through either body. . . . " The odds are decidedly against the resolution ever getting into the House, and even if it shall be reported, no one can find a majority in its favor. The trouble is that a large number of members who believe in Sunday opening on principle and as a matter of right, are too timid to vote their convictions in the face of the organized opposition from the churches and ministers. These statesmen argue that the men who want the Fair open on Sunday are reasonable men, who will not permit their judg- ment or their votes to be affected by failure to get what they want. J6 " Captivity of the Kepublic," pp. 41, 42. " Id., pp. 42-47, HOW THEY "ASSERTED THEMSELVES." 823 While, on the other hand, the church people icho are for Sunday dosing will, if their wishes are thwarted, lose their tempers, and at the next election, make trouble for those who wte against them. "This sort of cowardice or caution, combined with the fact that the ministers who are making Sunday closing a sort of stock-in-trade have no hesitancy about bulldozing their congressional representatives or any one else they can get hold of, offers an explanation of the changed condition of affairs with reference to this question." Lest anybody should be inclined to pass this by as a mere newspaper report, and perhaps prejudiced at that, we shall present the deliberate judgment of two members of the House. Representative Reilly, of Pennsylvania, made a statement which was printed in the same issue of the Her- ald as was the foregoing, as follows : "The present agitation, if continued, can only result in injury to the Fair. Attempts to have the law repealed only result in stirring up ani- mosity toward the Fair, and creating antagonism on the part of the church people. They can do the Fair much harm if they decide to carry out the threats they have already made, and I think the friends of the Ex- position who favor Sunday opening would act wisely in ceasing their efforts." And Representative George W. Houk wrote a letter on on this subject to President Higinbotham of the Exposition, which was printed in the Chicago Tribune, February 5, 1893. After stating his "deliberate conviction that Congress was and is without any constitutional power or authority what- ever to impose such a condition upon the grant of the appro- priation," he states the case thus : " At this point I now beg to call your attention to certain existing facts. A most extensive religious agitation has been made to prevail all over the country, upon this question. Concerted action has been taken by the clergy and upon the question as presented by them to their congregations, as to whether they were in favor of ' the desecration of the Sabbath.' An entire unanimity of sentiment has been obtained, of course, among the Protestant Christian churches at least, and other large organizations of Christian workers, against the repeal of the con- dition requiring the closing of the Exposition Sundays. "From the nature, extent, and character of the opposition, based as I think it is, upon an erroneous, though conscientious sentiment, rather than upon a deliberate and rational judgment, it occurs to me 824 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. that in case it were possible to have the existing law repealed, it might after all ultimately result in serious detriment to the final success of the Exposition. " It is of the first importance, in my judgment, to the final success of the Exposition that there should be a harmonious co-operation on the part of all the people of the United States in its support. If the present law requiring the gates to be closed Sundays to the public, should be re- pealed by a vote of a majority in both the House and Senate, which does not seem to me at all probable, and the act should receive the sanction of the president, which seems to be equally improbable, it is certain that the religious element of the country, through all its organizations, would be deeply offended, and would array itself in antagonism to the Fair. "It is not a question whether such a course would be reasonable or not ; and, while such action might be regarded as an exhibition of re- ligious fanaticism, most remarkable under the circumstances, it is never- theless true that a large number of good, conscientious, Christian people throughout the country, in their excited state of feeling upon this ques- tion, would be likely to pursue that course. "I am in a position to have reliable information in regard to this matter, and although I firmly believe that the refusal to permit the Ex- position to be opened to the public Sundays under the regulations I have suggested, will be a most deplorable mistake, I am also fully pur- suaded that the repeal of the existing law closing its gates would array the whole religious element of the United States (Protestant at least) against it. ... "The question now to be decided by the management is, whether it is advisable further to urge a doubtful contest, upon a matter that is ag a gravating an already extensive and bitter hostility against Chicago and the Exposition, which even if ultimately successful, would be as likely to be fraught with disaster as benefit to the enterprise." Now the Constitution of the United States is the only thing in existence that gives to any member of Congress, either senator or representative, any power or authority. He owes his very existence as a member of that body, to the Constitution. The Constitution defines his powers and sets the limitations of the exercise thereof. This is his only legiti- mate guide. To take any other thing as his guide in legisla- tion, is to repudiate the Constitution and to put that other THE UNDENIABLE RECORD. 825 thing in its place ; and, as shown before, is to rob the people of all the governmental authority which by the very idea of a written constitution, they have retained in their own hands, and is to make this other thing the governing power, instead of the people. It makes the caprice and arbitrary will of a few the only guide in legislation and governmental affairs, instead of the deliberate judgment of the majority as expressed in the Constitution. The undeniable record in this case shows that 1. The leaders of the combined churches of the United States asked Congress to do what they knew, and had de- clared for years, to be an unconstitutional thing. 2. When Congress did not respond readily enough, they turned their petitions into demands under threats. 3. Congressmen did yield to these threatening demands, openly announced that they did so, and that they did not dare to do otherwise. 4. When an attempt was made to have Congress undo this legislation and take its stand once more on the Constitu- tion only, the chairman of a congressional committee deliber- ately ruled out all discussion based upon the Constitution, and admitted, unquestioned, discussion based only upon religion and the consideration of " heavenly things." 5. To the threats and demonstrations of violence on the part of the church leaders, Congress yielded the second time, thus confirming its unconstitutional course instead of correcting it. 6. Congress thus confirmed its repudiation of the Con- stitution, its only legitimate guide, and its choosing as its guide instead the church power the very thing above all others that the Constitution and the fundamental principles of the government were intended forever to exclude. 7. And in confirmation of the known unconstitutionally of this whole high-handed procedure, the chief managers of this religious combination have since declared in print that 826 THE CONSPIRACY SUCCEEDS. CONCLUDED. " the Constitution furnished no guarantee for such legis- lation. v 18 How could there possibly be a more complete reversal of the order of things established and intended by those who made our national government and its Constitution ? How could there possibly be a more direct and complete revolu- tion of the principles of our government than has been ac- complished in this case, in its inception, its intent, its conduct, and its successful issue as it stands to-day through the decision of the Supreme Court, the action of Congress, and the approval of the president of the United States ? The Great Conspiracy has succeeded. It has accom- plished its avowed purpose "to change that feature of our fundamental law" which declares that "governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed ; " and in its place they have set up that feature of the papacy which insists that governments derive their powers from " the will of God" as expressed through the church. The government founded by our fathers according to the divine principles which Jesus Christ announced for civil governments, has been swept away ; and in its place there has been set up, in principle, and in procedure so far, THE LIVING IMAGE OF THE PAPACY. is u The National Reform Movement," a leaflet distributed at the annual convention of the National Reform Association, held in Allegheny, Pa., Novem- ber, 1893. CHAPTER XXIX. WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? AS to what shall be the results of this success of The Great Conspiracy, we might with perfect safety refer the reader to Chapters XII- XXI inclusive, of this book, as at the be- ginning of Chapter XXVII, and leave the matter there, well assured that the course of events will be in substance as there developed in the history of the like procedure before. However, as there are important developments already, it may be helpful and certainly not in vain to consider them. It is worthy of note that it is not merely to the church power in itself, but to the principle of violence and lawless- ness that the government of the United States has been sur- rendered. And that principle asserted by the professed Protestantism, the professed Christianity indeed, of the country by that which professes to represent, and in name does represent, all the elements of righteousness, peace, and gentleness ! This is what makes the situation so much worse than it otherwise would be. The facts set forth in the previous chapter, as well as the statements from representatives in Congress on the subject, show that the church people who were engaged in this cam- paign for national Sunday legislation, are worse than the people who do not belong to church. For "these states- men " argued that the people who were opposed to this legis- lation "are reasonable men who will not permit their judg- ment or their votes to be affected by failure to get what they want. While on the other hand, the church people who [827] 828 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? are for Sunday closing will, if their wishes are thwarted, lose their tempers, and at the next election make trouble for those who vote against them." What is this, then, but to say, and to say truly, that the church people who demand Sunday legislation are more unruly and more dangerous to public interests than the people who do not belong to the church ? For, generally speaking, the people who are op- posed to Sunday legislation are not church people ; and such church people as are opposed to it are not considered by these others to be "orthodox."" And in consideration of the mischief, the trouble, and the damage to the country, that they would do if they should not have their own way, the government itself must be surrendered to, and run in the interests of, this dangerous element ! Nor is it in Congress alone that this principle is recog- nized. It has been given a place in the judicial procedure of the United States courts. On page 749 reference is made to the decision of the United States Circuit Court for the western district of Tennessee giving legal sanction to the practice of persecution to secure the recognition of Sunday. In that same connection, the court said : "By a sort of factitious advantage, the observers of Sunday have secured the aid of the civil law, and adhere to that advantage with great tenacity, in spite of the clamor for religious freedom and the progress that has heen made in the absolute separation of Church and State. . . . And the efforts to extirpate the advantage above mentioned by judicial decision in favor of a civil right to disregard the change, seem to me quite useless." The court was composed of Circuit Judge Howell E. Jackson, now a member of the Supreme Court of the United States, and District Judge E. S. Hammond. The opinion was written by Judge Hammond, and was filed August 1, 1891. Then in the Memphis Appeal- Avalanche of August 30, there was published a four-column article by Judge Hammond, dated August 12, and entitled "The Sunday "PRESERVING THE PUBLIC ORDER." 829 Habit," which is little if anything else than a defense of the decision that had been rendered on this subject August 1. In this article the judge confesses that "the logic of this [his] position may lead to a union of Church and State un- doubtedly ; " but that the support of Sunday by the civil power and by persecutions " is a necessityof statesmanship " upon " the policy of securing the public peace." The dan- ger to the public peace, and the source of it, if Sunday laws were disregarded by those who have a "distaste for, or a disbelief in, the custom ; " or if they were attacked by a proposal to abolish them, is set forth as follows : " We have lived so free of it in modern days that we forget the force of religious fanaticism, and he who supposes that its fury cannot be again aroused may be mistaken. . . . "Christians would become alarmed, and they might substitute for the stars and other symbols of civil freedom upon the banners of their armed hosts, the symbol of the cross of Christ, and fight for their re- ligion at the expense of their civil government. They have done this in times that are passed, and they could do it again. And he is not a wise statesman who overlooks a possibility like this, and endangers the public peace. . . . " The civilian, as contradistinguished from the churchman, though united in tJie same person, may find in, the principle of preserving the public order a satisfactory warrant for yielding to religious prejudice and fanaticism the support of those laws, when the demand for such a sup- port may become a force that would disturb the public order. It may be a constantly diminishing force, but if it be yet strong enough to create disturbance, statesmanship takes account of it as a factor in the prob- lem.'' This statement and those of representatives Reilly and Houk, cited in the previous chapter, are the deliberate opinions of representative men, and officials in official place men who were in position not only to know, but in which they were obliged to consider the question in all its bearings. And when, having so considered the question, they set forth this as their deliberate conclusion, then nothing more is needed to demonstrate that the church element that is 830 WUAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? managing and supporting the Sunday cause in the United States is one of the most dangerous elements in the United States. This thought was so well presented before the House Committee on Columbian Exposition, January 12, 1893, by Mrs. Marion Foster Washburne, of Chicago, that her earnest and weighty words are worthy of a place in this or any other book. In referring to the speeches and representations of the clergy before the same committee the day before, she said: "Moreover, they threatened and of all things, the boycott! The very tactics they preach against from their pulpits. And one man said that the 'religious boycott was justified by the deep prejudices of the people.' "I have a profound respect and reverence, as all fair-minded people must have, for the man who believes in his religion and stands upon it against the world ; but I have precious little respect for the clergyman, who, when he wants to win a worldly advantage, uses a worldly argu- ment, making the admission that the heavenly one is insufficient for practical purposes. The man who claims to have faith in prayer, and yet descends to the boycott ! "... I know that we cannot possibly make as good a showing as some church societies, and the reason is that we are not organized as they are. The great mass of liberal and thoughtful people all over the country are not so organized that they can act as one, before such a com- mittee, but their numbers may be nay, are even greater than those contained in the societies here represented. They are simply quiet and tolerant private citizens, who, for the most part, are rather amused that any one should be intolerant. But while this organization of the evan- gelical churches gives them an advantage in being able to present petitions and speakers, it is, gentlemen, a danger ! Our forefathers fore- saw the danger of an organized minority coercing an unorganized majority, and forbade this country a standing army ; there is as much danger, or, as the history of religious persecution shows, more danger, in the interference of an organized body of churchmen in tlie affairs of the State, than in a standing army." x That the government and people of the United States should be deliberately surrendered into the power of this most dangerous and destructive element, is bad enough. 1 "Captivity of the Republic," pp. 50, 51. IT IS NOT CHRISTIANITY. 831 That this pandering to this most dangerous and destruc- tive element, and this deliberate surrender of the govern- ment and the nation to it, should be advertised and exalted as "wise statesmanship" by those who have done it, is far worse. It is not statesmanship of any kind, either wise or other- wise. It is shameful cowardice. It is a base betrayal of the supreme public trust the rights of all the people. But that this most dangerous and destructive element should be advertised and exalted and respected as Chris- tianity, by those who have surrendered to it, as well as by those who manifest it and impose it on the government, is simply abominable. Eead Luke 23 : 23, 24 ; Matt. 27 : 24. It is not Christianity in any sense. It is deviltry. Yet in the face of the indubitable evidence that the ele- ment that manages the Sunday cause is of such dangerous proclivities that the government of the United States must be surrendered to it in order "to preserve the public peace," these same ones evidently take great pride in advertising and exalting themselves as "the best people of the land," and the " law-abiding people of the country ! " The truth is, however, that this claim, like the claim of their Sunday Sabbath, is absolutely fraudulent. The undeni- able fact is that these very ones are of the least law-abiding people in the United States. They have demonstrated that they have no respect for any law but such as their own arbitrary will approves. For without the slightest hesi- tation, yea, rather, with open persistence, they have know- ingly disregarded and overridden the supreme law the Constitution of the United States. Their action is as much worse than that of the average law-breaker, and their offense as much greater, as the supreme law of the land is greater and more important than local statutes. The average law-breaker damages the individual / these supreme law-breakers damage the whole nation. The average law-breaker invades the rights of the individual; 61 832 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? these supreme law-breakers have invaded and even swept away the rights of all the people. The average law.-breaker disregards social order only in the locality where he is ; while these supreme law-breakers strike at the very exist- ence of social order by breaking down the chief govern- mental safeguard. For the average law-breaker, there is always a ready remedy in the regular forms of governmental order ; but for these supreme law-breakers, these who have overridden the Constitution, and so have broken down the established safeguards of governmental order itself, where is the remedy ? These facts demonstrate that instead of their being truly the law-abiding portion of the people, these men are among the chiefest law-breakers in the land the most lawless of all the nation. Nor is this at all to be wondered at. For in order to accomplish this their bad purpose, they "gladly joined hands" and hearts with the papacy that power which the Lord designates as the "lawless one" and as the very "mystery of lawlessness" itself. 2 Thess. ii, 3, 7 (R. V.). ' Nor is it to be considered at all strange that they should show themselves so lawless as to- disregard and override the supreme law of the nation, and join themselves to the very "mystery of lawlessness" to accomplish this lawless pur- pose. For, for all these years they have openly, both in actions and words, disregarded and overridden the supreme law of the universe, the law of God which he proclaimed with a voice that shook the earth, and wrote with his own finger of fire on the tables of stone, and they have fol- lowed the preaching, the precedent, and the authority of the mystery of lawlessness in the doing of it. The Sabbath of the Lord, the seventh day, which he him- self has named and appointed, which he declared with his own voice from heaven, which is his own, upon which he placed his blessing, which he made holy, and which he sanctified this, the Sabbath of the Lord, is the sign of SUPREME LAWLESSNESS. 833 what Jesus Christ is to those who believe in him. The ob- servance of it by faith the true observance of it brings into the life of the believer in Jesus, as nothing else can, the living presence and power of Jesus Christ. This is true, and every man may know it by faith in Jesus. All these years they and the people have been told in the words of God that "the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord." But instead of believing it, or allowing the peo- ple to believe it, they have disregarded it and declared that it is not so. They have taught the people that it is not so. They have put no difference between the holy and the pro- fane (Ezek. xxiii, 36), by telling the people that it makes no difference what day they keep. Thus they disregard the law of the living God, and teach the people to disregard it. Then after teaching the people to disregard the plain word of the law of God as to the observance of the day which he has commanded, and telling all that there is no command of God for the observance of Sunday, they join heart and hand with the Mystery of Lawlessness to force upon all the Sunday which the papacy lias established instead of the Sabbath of the Lord. They set the sign of the Mystery of Lawlessness above the sign of the living God, and would compel all to receive it. Having thus forsaken the Lord, and all true allegiance to his law, and gone over bodily and heartily and " gladly '' to the Mystery of Lawlessness having g'one to such lengths as this in despising the law of the living God, it is not at all to be wondered at that they would despise the supreme law of the government of the United States, nor that they should require Congress, in violation of its solemn oath, to join in their high-handed enterprise, and establish their lawless pur- pose by the surrender of the power of the national govern- ment into their hands to be used at their lawless will, and to enforce upon all their lawless decrees. In view of such an example as this, should it be thought surprising that lawlessness should be manifested by others 834 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? throughout the whole country as never before, and that vio- lence should cover the land from ocean to ocean ? In view of such an example as this set by " the best people " of the land, should it be thought strange that the example should be followed by the "Industrials," " Common wealers," "Coxeyites," or the worst people of the land? If it is proper for the preachers and churches of the country to threaten Congress till their confessedly unconstitutional de- mands are complied with, why is it not equally proper for the " Commonwealers," and everybody else, also to threaten Congress till their demands are complied with ? If Con- gress can guarantee to the people religion, even on Sunday, why shall it not also guarantee to the people money on every day of the week ? When the principle of the petition by threat, and legislation by clamor, and the surrender of governmental prerogative to preserve the public peace, has been once recognized in favor of one class, then why shall not the principle be applied in behalf of any and every other class, on demand? Why should Coxey, Browne, Kelly, Frye, and company be denounced, prosecuted, fined, and imprisoned, while simply following the example of Crafts, Cook, Shepard, George, and company, in which these latter were listened to and honored by the preference of Congress. There is another result, or rather, phase of the same re- sult, which has appeared promptly upon this action of the professed Protestantism of the United States ; that is, the bold and rapid strides of the papacy to take advantage of that which has been done, and through this to take posses- sion of the country itself. Nor indeed should any one be surprised at this ; it was only to be expected. For when the professed Protestantism of the country, to accomplish its lawless purpose to gain control of the national power, gladly joined hands with the Mystery of Lawlessness ; what else could be expected than that she should at once lay claim to all the "benefits" to be derived from the trans- TO SAVE THE NATION. 835 action in itself, and press the principles of the transaction to the utmost limit of their logic in her own behalf ? As we have before shown, the aim and purpose of the National Reform combination was identical with the aim and purpose of the papacy. It was therefore with great gladness that Rome heard the declaration of the Supreme Court of the United States that "this is a Christian nation," with the citation of Catholic documents to prove it, and also saw Congress set up the sign of her authority the Sunday as the holy day of the nation in express exclusion of the Sabbath of the Lord. It was with supreme satisfaction that she saw her own sign of her own salvation, set up in the United States by a national act as a symbol of the salva- tion of the nation. 2 In our opposition to the National Re- 2 That it was for the salvation of the nation was definitely expressed in the Senate. Senator Hawley said : "This very day and this hour, I would not for the wealth of ten exposi- tions, have upon my shoulders the responsibility of having decided this question wrongly upon what may be a turning-point in the history of the United States. Open the Exposition on Sunday, and the flood-gates are opened. ... I ask you to regard that which is of immeasurable importance in the salvation of a nation, the great, profound sense of religious obligation." Congressional Record, July 12, 1892, pp. 6699-6700. Senator Colquitt said : " Without legislation relating to the great contests that are going on in this country, without the interference of bayonets, without calling upon the militia, without the marshaling of armed forces, if there is one palliative, if there is one preventive, if there is one check, if there is one remedy that is g^ing to cure all of these discordant elements of strife and bloodshed, it is tht observance of the Sabbath day and the observance of the restraints of our home in addition." Id., July 13, 1892, p. 6755. Senator Frye said : " I believe that the salvation of this country depends upon the nearness to which it approaches the Sabbath of the early days. We have been wandering from it from time to time, getting away from it. The sooner we get back to it the better it will be for this republic." Id., July 12, 1892, p. 6703. It is a forcible comment on Senator Colquitt's speech, that whereas Sunday was thus set up to save the nation from " the interference of bayonets," etc., one of the very first things done by the church leaders after the passage of this act, was 836 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? form movement we told the National Reformers and all the people, over and over, that in all their efforts and argu- ments they were but playing into the hands of Rome ; and that their success would be the assured success of Rome in this country. In December, 1886, the author of this book published in the American Sentinel the following passage on this subject : "Although the Catholic Church apparently takes no very active in- terest in this movement itself, we may rest assured that there is not a single writer nor a single official of the Catholic Church, from the pope to the lowest priest in America, who ever ' for an instant' loses sight of the movement, or of the 'prescriptions 'which the pope has given in view of it. "Then when the matter comes to the enforcement of the laws, what is to hinder the Catholics from doing it, and that, too. in the Catholic way ? Every priest in the United States is sworn to root out heresy. And Monsignor Capel, in our own cities and at our very doors, defends the 'Holy Inquisition.' 3 When the refusal to observe Sunday becomes heresy that can be reached by the law, what, then, is to hinder the Catholics from rooting out the heresy ? Certainly when the National Reformers shall have been compelled by the necessity of the situation to join hands with the Catholics to secure the laws which they desire, it would not be in their power, even were it in their disposition, to repeal the laws ; so there would then be nothing left but the enforcement of the laws by Catholics, if by nobody else. This view of the case alone ought to be sufficient to arouse every Protestant and every American to the most uncompromising opposition to the National Reform party. " It is of no use for the National Reformers to say that they will not allow the Catholics to do these things. For when the National Reform- ers, to gain the ends which they have in view, are compelled by ' the to call upon the president to enforce it at the point of the bayonet ; and in the year 1894 the principal part of the country from ocean to ocean was marked with " the interference of bayonets," with " calling upon the militia," and with " the marshaling of armed forces." The Pharisees of oLl rejected the Lord of the Sabbath, and chose a robber instead to save that nation; but their action de- stroyed the nation. The Pharisees of our day rejected the Sabbath of the Lord and chose a robber Sunday in its stead, to save this nation. But like the efforts of the Pharisees before, instead of saving the nation, it will destroy the nation. 3 Archbishop Corrigan and others did it again at the Chicago Catholic Congress, 1893. THE POLITY OF ROME. 837 necessity of the situation,' to unite with Rome, having, by the help of Rome, gained those ends, it will be impossible, without the help of Rome, either to make them effective or to reverse them, or to hinder Rome from making them effective in her own way. When the thing is done, it will be too late to talk of not allowing this or that. The whole thing will then be sold into the hands of Rome, and there will be no remedy. " Lord Macaulay made no mistake when he wrote the following : " 'It is impossible to deny that the polity of the Church of Rome is the very masterpiece of human wisdom. . . . The experience of twelve hundred eventful years, the ingenuity and patient cure of forty genera- tions of statesmen, have improved that polity to such perfection that, among the contrivances which have been devised for deceiving and op- pressing mankind, it occupies the highest place.' * "And it is into the hands of this mistress of human deception and oppression that the National Reformers deliberately propose to surrender the United States government and the American people. But just as surely as the American people allow the National Reform party, or any- thing else, out of seeming friendship for Christianity, or for any other reason, to do this thing, they are undone. "We know that a good many people have regarded the American Sentinel as exerting itself to no purpose, because they think there is no danger of the success of National Reform. But in the National Reform party, allied with Home, there is danger. Then put with this the almost universal demand for more rigorous laws, more vigorously enforced, for the stricter religious observance of Sunday, the very thing above all others at which the National Reform movement aims, the danger is in- creased and is imminent. In view of these facts, there is great danger that through the sophistry of the National Reform arguments, the ill- informed zeal of thousands upon thousands of people who favor Sunday laws will be induced to support the National Reform movement, and so they and the whole nation be delivered into the hands of Rome. There js danger in the National Reform movement. We know it, and by the evidences we here give in their own words, it is high time that the American people began to realize it. "We say that if the National Reformers and the Catholics, or any others, want to keep Sunday, let them do it. But Heaven forefeud that they shall ever succeed in securing the laws that they ask, by which they will compel others to do it. And we do most devoutly pray, God forbid that they shall ever succeed in their scheme of putting into the hands of Rome the power to enforce religious laws, and to correct heresy. God forbid that they shall ever succeed in making free America a slave to Rome. 4 " Essays," Von Rankc. 838 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? "The success of the National Reform movement is the success of Rome. How many, then, of the American people are ready to enter into the National Reform scheme ? " Bear in mind that this quotation was printed in 1886. And now in view of this we ask a careful consideration of the following important facts and statements : All these years, and even to the very latest document issued Novem- ber, 1893, the National Reform combination has constantly presented as the basis, and the. leading argument, for the governmental recognition of their religion, that "this coun- try was settled by Christian men having Christian ends in view." And now that they have secured their long-desired governmental recognition of "the Christian religion," the Catholic Church appropriates the argument bodily, and boldly declares that America was first discovered and settled by Catholic Christian men, having Catholic Christian ends in view. At the late World's Congress of Religions, Chicago, 1893, this was made plain beyond all chance for question. In a paper read by Professor Thomas O 'Gor- man, of the Catholic University of Washington, D. C., it is presented more fully and compactly than in any other place we have found, and we shall therefore quote largely from it. On this point of the discovery and settlement of America "by Christian men having Christian ends in view," he says : "By right of discovery and possession, dating back almost nine hun- dred years, America is Christian. On the waters of Lake Michigan, close to the Convent of La Rabida are moored three Spanish caravels and a little farther away one Viking ship. All three convent, caravels, and Scandinavian craft are evidences of an acquaintance between America and the church in times when the only Christianity in existence was Catholic. This fact is sufficient justification for a change I have allowed myself to make. In the programme, this paper has for title, 'Relation of the Catholic Church to America.' For wider latitude and juster account, I make it, ' Relation of Christianity to America.' "The strange Viking boat carries the relation to a period antedating Columbus by almost five hundred years. About the year 1000, Christian THE CA TIIO LIC CHURCH AND AMERICA. 839 colonists from Norway founded in Greenland a Christian community, which for four hundred years that is, almost down to the days of Columbus possessed a body of Catholic priests and a continuous line of bishops in communion with the popes of Rome. From Greenland, traders and missionaries pushed westward to the mainland. Trading posts and mission stations, if not permanent settlements, arose on the coasts of New England, and the natural products of this country found their way to Europe and even to Rome, the capital of Christendom, as payment of the Peter pence from the Catholic people of far-away Green- land and Vinland. In the showcases of the Convent of La Rahida in your White City are some of the many contemporary documents which prove these facts, and imply a relation existing long before Columbus, between Rome and the land that was to become in later ages the cradle of the American Republic. For reasons which it is not my present task to indicate, the intercourse had gradually grown intermittent, and had all but ceased when Columbus appeared. At any rate, it had never dawned on the mind of Europe that the far-away Scandinavian colony was in a new continent. Greenland and Vinland were supposed to be connected in some way with northern Europe, and to be a southern dip of the known continent into habitable western latitudes from uninhabitable polar regions. So much for the older acquaintance between the church and America., "AMERICA DISCOVERED BY CATHOLICS. "The Spanish convent and caravels indicate a relation that began four hundred years ago ; a relation which was to Europe the revelation of a new world, what the Scandinavian relation had not been ; a relation that has not ceased since, as had the Scandinavian ; a relation that at first flitted like some distant dream before the eyes of Spain in the solemn halls of Salamanca, that gradually took on some faint reality be- neath the walls of Granada, in the quiet port of Palos, that finally be- came fact on the newly-found shores of San Salvador, in the shadow of the cross raised on American soil by the successful discoverer. The books, pamphlets, lectures, and articles written in this Columbian anni- versary prove beyond a candid doubt that the discovery of America was eminently a religious enterprise, and that the desire to spread Christianity was, I will not say the only, but the principal motive that prompted the leaders engaged in that memorable venture. Before you can strip the discovery of its religious character, you must unchristen the admiral's flagship [Santa Maria], and tear from her bulwarks the painting of the patroness [the Virgin Mary], under whose auspices the gallant craft plowed her way through the terrors of the unknown ocean. 840 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? " MOTIVES OF THE EARLY COLONISTS. "The inspiration that gave the Old World a new continent was also the cause of its colonization and civilization. Various popes from Alexander VII, 1493, to Leo XI, 1514, approved aud legalized discovery and occupation in America. The purpose of their bulls was to prevent or settle difficulties aud wars between rival claimants to the new lands. The indirect results of their intervention were of untold benefit to hu- manity. That intervention promoted the geographical study and knowl- edge of the globe, instigated Magellan's voyage around the world, created the partition of the continent, and hence also the colonial system out of which this great nation is born." Thus the National Reformers see their fundamental argu- ment appropriated by Rome and used to her sole advantage; and not one of them, nor yet all of them together, can suc- cessfully dispute it for a moment. And so we and they see fulfilled to-day that which we have told them all the time, that in all their efforts they were but playing into the hands of Rome. Again: The National Reform combination .has always made the fallacious claim that the union of religion and the State is not the union of Church and State ; and vice verm, the separation of Church and State does not mean the separation of the State from religion. This claim the Catholic Church now appropriates, and declares : "We may truly say that with us separation of Church and State is not separation of the nation from religion." * And thus again we and they see fulfilled that which we told them long ago, and repeatedly. Again : The National Reform combination has argued that Sunday laws, Thanksgiving proclamations, and other official documents of presidents and governors, laws which upheld "Christian marriage" by prohibiting polygamy, chaplains in army and navy, in Congress and legislatures, and decisions of courts that Christianity is part of the com- mon law. all prove that this is a Christian nation. All "THE STATE'S CHRISTIANITY." 841 this also the Catholic Church has adopted as proof of her claims upon the nation. Professor O'Gorrnan continues : " Of what I should call the State's Christianity, I give the following evidences : "Not only does the federal government make Sunday a legal day of rest for all its officials, but the States have Sunday laws which do not enforce any specific worship, but do guard the day's restfulness. More- over, certain religious holy days are made legal holidays. "Presidents and governors in official documents recognize the depen- dence of the nation on God and the duty of gratitude to him. . . . "The action of Congress in regard to Mormonism is an upholding of the Christian marriage, and in all the States bigamy is a crime. Immor- ality is not allowed by the civil power to flaunt itself in public, but is driven to concealment, and the decalogue, inasmuch as it relates to the social relations of man, is enforced. "Celebrations of a public and official character, sessions of State legislatures and Congress are opened with prayer. Chaplains are ap- pointed at public expense for Congress, the army, the navy, the military and naval academies, the State legislatures and institutions. . . . "More than once it-has been decided by courts that we are a Chris- tian people, and that Christianity is part of our unwritten law, as it is part of the common law of England. "Such, briefly, is the relation of Christianity to the American Republic, when we consider only its internal life. Are we not justified in concluding that here Christianity has added to her domain a nation which is the most active, the most progressive, and not the least intel- lectual in this nineteenth century ! " When it is borne in mind that by the term " Chris- tianity." Professor O'Gorman means Catholicism, and Catholicism alone, the force of this array of National Re- form "evidences'"' is clearly seen and appreciated. Again : The Supreme Court of the United States de- clared that " we are a religious people," and that " this is a Christian nation." This the National Reform combination hailed as containing "all that the National Reform Asso- ciation seeks ; " and this they have been using ever since as the official and ultimate authority that must settle every ques- tion and silence every word of doubt or dissent. As proofs of its declaration that "this is a Christian nation," and that 842 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? this is the meaning of the Constitution, the Supreme Court not only cited the commission of Ferdinand and Isabella to Columbus, but also "the form of oath universally prevail- ing ; " the laws respecting the observance of the Sabbath ; the constitutional proviso "that the Executive shall have ten days (Sunday excepted) within which to determine whether he will approve or veto a bill," etc. This whole ground is covered in just two sentences by Professor O'Gorman, with direct reference to the Constitution, as follows : " Our political charter presupposes God and Christianity, presup- poses the main facts and the past history of Christianity, and is bound to them " by discovery and colonisation. The oath required from all officers of the federal government, the exemption of Sunday from their working days, the subscription, ' In the year of our Lord ' are a recognition of God, and imply that the Lord Jesus Christ is the turning-point of hu- manity, the source and beginning of a new order." Once more : The Supreme Court also cited the Declara- tion of Independence as proof that this is a Christian nation. Professor O'Gorman follows to the same extreme, and then declares that the Catholic Church is the foundation of it all. Here are his words : "Look at the fundamental articles, the formative principles of the republic, 'All men are created equal; they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights ; among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ; to secure these, governments are insti- tuted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.' These are Christian principles asserting God, creation, the rights of the creature, and by implication the duties that are correl- ative to those rights. To these principles the Catholic Church gave an im- pregnable foundation when in the Council of Trent, she defined that reason is not totally obscured, and will is not totally depraved." Then in his closing sentences he sums up all, covers the whole ground, and swallows up everything into the Catholic Church, as follows : "Our roots are in the good ; our up-growth must needs be toward the better. The affirmation of any one truth, logically followed out, leads to the knowledge and affirmation of all truth. The American Republic began in the affirmation of certain fundamental evident truths THE NATION'S PERFECTION. 843 of reason ; our dominant tendency, therefore, the law of our progression, is toward complete truth, if we but remain true to the spirit that called us into being, and still, thank God, animates our present living. "We believe that divine Providence led to the discovery of this con- tinent and directed its settlement and guided the birth of this nation, for a new and more complete application to political society of the truths affirmed by reason and Christian revelation, for the upbuilding of a nation as great religiously as it is politically, of a nation that shall find its perfection in Catholic Christianity. With that freedom allowed every speaker in this Parliament of Religions, I affirm my sincere conviction that Catholic Christianity is the fullness of truth, natural and supernatural, rational and revealed ; that Catholic Christianity is the strongest bulwark of law and order in this republic. If ever our country should fail and fall, it is not from the Catholic Church that shall come the shout of triumph at the failure and the fall, for never has she had a fairer field of work than the United States of America." Thus Rome sets herself forward as the end and all, and hers the prior and supreme right, in all things pertaining to this union of '.'religion and the State," in this "Chris- tian nation of the United States.". And the blindness of professed Protestants and of the Supreme Court has given her the complete legal, legislative, and gov- ernmental basis for all her claims. And we say again that there is not one person in the National Reform combi- nation, nor in the whole combination together ; not one member of the Supreme Court, nor yet the whole court to- gether; who can successfully dispute the argument or the claim Rome is now making upon the foundation which they themselves have so surely laid for her. And so we and they see fulfilled to-day before the eyes of the whole nation, and of the world, that which we have all the time told them, that they were only playing into the hands of Rome. To- day Rome is profiting by that in which the National Re- formers have always fondly hoped they themselves might be profited. And Rome knows it ; and all these assumptions and logical claims from National Reform and Supreme Court, premises, arguments, and declarations, she also backs up 844 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? with the publicly-announced plan of Leo XIII, with respect to the United States and through this for Europe and "all humanity," as follows : "In hia [Pope Leo's] view, the United States has reached the period when it becomes necessary to bring about the fusion of all the heteroge- neous elements in one homogeneous and indissoluble nation. ... It is for this reason that the pope wants the Catholics to prove themselves the most enlightened and most devoted workers for national unity and political assimilation. . . . America feels the need of this work of in- ternal fusion. . . . What the church has done in the past for others, she will do for the United States. . . . That is the reason the Holy See encourages the American clergy to guard jealously the solidarity, and to labor for the fusion of all the foreign and heterogeneous elements into one vast national family. . . . "Finally, Leo XIII desires to see strength in that unity. Like all intuitive souls, he hails in the united American States and in their young and flourishing church, the source of new life for Europeans. He wants America to be powerful, in order that Europe may regain strength from borrowing a rejuvenated type. Europe is closely watching the United States. . . . Henceforth we [Europeans] will need authors who will place themselves on this ground ; ' What can we borrow, and what ought we to borrow from the United States for our social, political, and ecclesiastical reorganization f ' The answer depends in great measure upon the development of American destinies. If the United States suc- ceed in solving the many problems that puzzle us, Europe will follow her example, and this outpouring of light will mark a date in the history not only of the United States, BUT OF ALL HUMANITY. "That is why the holy father, anxious for peace and strength, col- laborates with passion in the work of consolidation and development in American affairs. According to him, the church ought to be the chosen crucible for the moulding and absorption of races into one united family. And that, especially, is the reason why he labors at the codification of ecclesiastical affairs, in order that this distant member of Christianity may infuse new blood into the old organism." 6 And this was swiftly followed by the establishment of Satolli as permanent apostolic delegate here to carry out this plan ; and, Satolli openly declared at the Catholic Congress in Chicago, September 5, 1893, not only that this is his place and work here, but commanded the Catholics of the United 6 Letter from the Vatican to the New York Sun, July 11, 1892. LEO'S CHARGE AND 8ATOLLFS MISSION. 845 States to carry out this scheme. His words are as follows: "In the name of Leo XIII, I salute the great American republic, and I call upon the Catholics of America to go forward, in one hand bearing the book of Christian truth, and in the other the Constitution of the United States. . . . "To-day this is the duty of the Catholics: To bring into the world the fullness of supernatural truth and supernatural life. This especially is the duty of a Catholic Congress. There are the nations who have never separated from the church, but who have neglected often to apply in full degree the lessons of the gospel. There are the nations who have gone out from the church, bringing with them many of her treasures, and because of what they have brought, shedding partial light. But cut off from the source, unless that source is again brought into close contact with them, there is danger for the future. "Bring them in contact with their past by your action and teaching. Bring your fellow-countrymen, bring your country into immediate contact, icith that great secret of blessedness Christ and 7iis church. And in this manner shall it come to pass the word of the psalmist shall be fulfilled: 'Mercy and justice have met one another, justice and peace have kissed.' . . . "Now all these great principles have been marked out in most illuminous lines in the encyclicals of the great pontiff, Leo XIII. He has studied them. Hold fast to them as the safest anchorage, and all will be well. These several questions are studied the world over. It is well they be studied in America, for here in America do we have more than elsewhere the key to the future. [Applause.] " Here in America you have a country blessed specially by Provi- dence in the fertility of field and the liberty of its Constitution. [Loud applause.] Here you have a country which will repay all efforts [loud and prolonged applause] not merely tenfold, but, aye a hundredfold. And this no one understands better than the immortal Leo. And he charges me, his delegate, to speak out to America words of hope and blessing, words of joy. Go forward ! in one hand bearing the book of Christian truth the Bible and in the other the Constitution of the United States." [Tremendous applause, the people rising to their feet.] The Constitution of the United States as it was made, and as it was intended by its makers to remain, was directly opposed to every principle and every purpose of Rome. The founders of the government of the United States said that " to judge for ourselves and to engage in the exercise of 846 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? religion agreeably to the dictates of our own consciences is an unalienable right, which, upon the principles on which the gospel was first propagated, and the reformation from popery carried on, can never be transferred to another." They said further that " it is impossible for the magistrate to adjudge the right of preference among the various sects which profess the Christian faith, without erecting a claim to infallibility which would lead us lack to the Church of Rome." Thus certainly did the makers of this government intend that the people of the United States should never, by any act of the government, be led back to the Church of Rome ; and thus certainly did they intend that the government of the United States should never touch any question of religion, and specifically ' ' the Christian religion, " in order that their expressed purpose might prevail, that the people should not be led back to the Church of Rome and popery. And the Constitution, as our fathers made it and in- tended it, no Catholic was ever commanded by any pope to take in one hand, with the Catholic Bible in the other. But when that Constitution was interpreted to mean that "this is a Christian nation;" when that Constitution was interpreted according to Rome's principles, and the sign of her authority, with Catholic documents, was cited to support this interpretation, then it was, and not till then, that all Catholics were commanded to take this Catholic Constitu- tion in one hand, and the Catholic Bible in the other, and, with Satolli at their head, go forward to their "hundred- fold " reward in the United States, and through this bring again " all Europe " and " all humanity " back into immedi- ate contact with " the church." And now with the Catholic Bible in one hand, and the Catholic Constitution of the United States in the other, the Catholic Church steps forth and declares that this is a Catho- lic Christian nation. The arguments which the National Reformers have used all these years to prove that this is -STAMPED FOR A CATHOLIC LAND." 847 a Christian nation, she now boldly appropriates, and says that they mean that this is a Catholic Christian nation. All the claims which the National Reform combination has presented for the governmental recognition of religion, the Catholic Church now adopts, and declares as the conse- quence that it is governmental recognition of the Catholic religion. And with all this prestige and power already within her grasp, she grows enthusiastic, and is now circulating official documents in the United States, in which she openly an- nounces the "collapse of Protestantism,'' and her hope to "missionize" the United States "in half a decade;" and at the same time abruptly challenges all Protestants to show why they keep Sunday. And to cap it all, she publishes to the people of the United States the following, which she herself pronounces "bold doctrines to preach to Ameri- cans : " " The friends of Catholicity assure us that, as God in his providence creates a new soul for every human body that is born into the world, so the American republic was no sooner born from the womb of time than he in like manner created a spiritual republic to be its com- panion, its protector, and infallible guide through all the years of its existence. "They tell us furthermore that as the soul can live without the body, but the body cannot live without the soul, so the church can live without the republic, but the republic cannot live without the church. In a word, that the church is necessary to the republic, and without her spiritual guidance, the republic must inevitably fail, as have all the ancient republics of history before her. . . . "Is not this whole country stamped for a Catholic land ? With the great doctor, St. Augustine guarding the Atlantic Coast, and the heroic missionary, San Francisco, the Pacific ; with the indomitable apostle, St. Paul, kindling zeal and enthusiasm in the North, and the gentle San Antonio inspiring love and peace in the South ; with the warrior king, St. Louis, in the center, and the great St. Joseph and Notre Dame, the gracious queen of heaven, hard by, with all these powerful intercessors pleading for her, can we, I say, expect anything less than a glorious triumph for Catholicity in America ? 62 848 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS? "Surely God's plans are manifest. America is the last and greatest of nations, and he means to possess her for himself. . . . The nets of St. Peter will drag this continent from ocean to ocean, till they are filled to breaking with the souls of men that shall be saved." 7 Immediately following these manifestations in the World's Parliament of Religions, carne the celebration of Cardinal Gibbons's jubilee, October 18, 19, 1893, at which the union of the Catholic Church and the American State was deftly announced, by Archbishop Ireland, with some other statements that are worthy of note in this connection. At the celebration, Archbishop Ireland delivered a pane- gyric upon Cardinal Gibbons, in which he joined Leo XIII and the cardinal together as links which are to bind together "the church and the age," and himself gave the definition of his expression, "The church and the age," thus : "Rome is the church; America is tfie age. " With this specific defini- tion, there will be no difficulty in seeing the archbishop's meaning in the extracts which we shall present. Speaking evidently of the cardinal, the archbishop said : " I indicate the opportunity for the great and singular churchman. His work is to bridge the deep valley separating the age from the church, to clear off the clouds which prevent the one from seeing the realities of the other, to bring the church to the age and the age to the church." With Rome as the church, and America as the age, it is clear that the archbishop's speech is in the direct line of SatollTs instructions from Leo to the Catholics of America to bring their "country into immediate contact with" "the church." The archbishop continues : "I preach the new, the most glorious crusade. Church and age ! Unite them in mind and heart, in the name of humanity, in the name of God. Church and age ! Bring them into close contact ; they pulsate alike ; the God of humanity works in one, the God of supernatural reve- lation works in the other in both the selfsame God." 7 " The Catholic Church and the American Republic, Historically, Analytic- ally, and Prophetically Considered," 1893, pp. 2, 3, 15, 16. ROME AND AMERICA. 849 And of course for all the purposes of this design, this "crusade," and of those engaged in it, the pope is this god who works in both "the church and the age." This is more clearly indicated in another place in the archbishop's speech, as follows : " Surely much yet is to be done before the union of age and church is complete, but the work has begun and has progressed to a surprising degree. Let us pray that Leo may live yet many years, and that when death at last comes, Leo's spirit may yet dominate in the Vatican, and all will be well. Meanwhile, in America, let Catholics of America cluster around him, inhale his ideas and work with him, as Americans should work, in energy and earnestness. We are especially favored by him. He lives among us in an especial manner, having sent to us his chosen rep- resentative, who makes Leo known to us as no other could, whose words, whose acts, prove to us daily how truly Leo is pontiff of the age. Mon- signor Satolli, the church and the age ! ROME IS THE CHURCH ; AMERICA IS THE AGE ! And Monsignor Satolli's command to Catholics of America is : ' Go forward, on the road of progress, bear- ing inone hand the book of Christian truth Christ's gospel and in the other the Constitution of the United States.'" Next the archbishop turns personally to the cardinal, and defines his place, thus : - "I have spoken of the providential pope of Rome. I speak now of the providenital archbishop of Baltimore How oft, in past years, I have thanked God that in this latter quarter of the nineteenth century, Cardinal Gibbons had been given to us as primate, as leader, Catholic of Catholics, American of Americans, a bishop of his age and to his country; he is to America what Leo is to all Christendom. ... A particular mission is reserved to the American cardinal. . . . America is watched? The prelate who in America is the representative of the union of church and age is watched. His leadership guides the combatants the world over. . . . The ripplings of Cardinal Gibbons's influence cross the threshold of the Vatican. . . . The historic incident of the Knights of Labor, whose condemnation Cardinal Gibbons averted by personal in; terview with Leo, was one of the preparations to the encyclical on the Condition of Labor. "The work of Cardinal Gibbons forms an epoch in the history of the church in America. He has made known, as no one before him did, the church to the people of America ; he has demonstrated the fitness of the church for America, the natural alliance existing between the church 850 WHAT SHALL BE THE RESULTS/ and the freedom-giving institutions of America. Through his action the scales have fallen from the eyes of non-Catholics, prejudices have van- ished. He, the great churchman, is the great citizen. Church and country unite in him, and the magnetism of the union pervades the whole land, teaching laggard Catholics to love America, teaching well-disposed non- Catholics to trust tJie church." Nor is this all theory, nor simply the grandiloquence of a set panegyric. For before that celebration was over, there was furnished an object-lesson, which, whether it was pre- arranged or .not, was seized upon and made to tell for all the occasion was worth, and in Rome's hand it is worth a great deal. The next night after this speech was made, a grand banquet was held in honor of the cardinal and the occasion. At that banquet the vice-president of the United States sat at the right hand of the cardinal. And in response to loud calls for a speech at the table, Archbishop Ireland made use of this situation to the following effect : * "I do not know whether or not you appreciate the full value of THE UNION YOU SEE TYPIFIED HERE TO-NIGHT, THE UNION OP THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND AMERICA, the fraternity between the church and the non-Catholics of the nation. The vice-president of the United States comes here and takes his seat alongside the cardinal. This spirit of fraternity BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE, THUS TYPIFIED, is the result of the work of our American cardinal. . . . In this freest of democracies it was his providential mission to prove that the Catholic Church is at home. . . . Of this our cardinal is proof to all men, to all the world. ... I wish for him many years of life for the sake of the church and for the sake of the country that he may go to work even more vigorously, bringing into closer contact the old church and the new democracy." 8 Another thing which is giving the papacy an opportunity constantly to put itself forward in the United States both to magnify itself and to exalt Sunday, is the universal labor troubles and their attendant lawlessness. When in March, 1890, the emperor of Germany appointed his "International Labor Conference," he not only appointed the Roman 8 These quotations are all taken from the Catholic Times, of Philadelphia, October 21, 1893. ROME AND LABOR TROUBLES. 851 Catholic prince-bishop, of Breslau, as his personal dele- gate, but sent a personal letter to the pope, asking him to take an interest in the conference; to " follow with sym- pathy the progress of the deliberations;" and to lend his "benevolent support to the work." In reply, the pope took particular pains to remind the emperor of "the teaching of the Catholic Church of which We are the head ; " to suggest among other subjects for consideration by the conference the subject of " rest on the Lord 'y faith in Christ, they actually compel -men by the condemnation of the law of men. Professing to lead in the way of righteousness, uprightness, and sincerity, they actually lead in the way of unrighteous- ness, corruption, and deceit. Professing themselves to be models of Protestantism, they have actually joined hands with Romanism, and follow her customs, and require all to receive the sign of her authority. Professing to be the example in all things good, they actually set the example in the chief things that are bad. Thus again, these who had been espoused to Christ, who had been joined to him in the bonds of heavenly alliance, have violated their vows and broken their marriage bonds to Him who is perfect in power, in love, and purity. Once more these have forsaken the heavenly power, and sought for earthly power. They have forsaken the arm of the Lord, and have put their confidence in the arm of flesh. They 882 THE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY. have forsaken the heavenly Husband, and have formed an adulterous connection with an earthly lord. Once more the unholy church has formed an unholy connection with the unholy State. And once more the very first fruit of it is a national law expressive of her will in the matter of Sunday observance, and the rest of the baleful fruit of such illicit connection will inevitably follow. Is it at all strange, therefore, that the following passage should have been printed, even some time ago, by a leading divine 8 in one of the leading "Protestant" papers of the country ? Discussing the question of the reunion of Chris- tendom, he argues for it against certain ones, thus : "You would exclude the Roman Catholic Church, the mother of u-s all, the church of scholars and saints, such as Augustine, and Aquinas, and Bernard, and Fenelon ; the church of all races, ranks, and classes, which already gives signs of becoming American as well as Roman. . . . You would exclude also the Protestant Episcopal Church, the beautiful daughter of a beautiful mother." That was printed February 9, 1888, in the Evangelist, New York City, one of the two leading Presbyterian papers of the country. And from that time to this, never have we seen or heard a single word of protest or dissent from any of the professed evangelical Protestant churches of the country. This states their relationship to "Babylon, the mother of harlots " as that of daughters ; and even beautiful daughters, after the "beautiful mother." Their silence is consent that the relationship is correctly stated. And their action in forsaking their rightful Lord and entering into this illicit union with another is positive demonstration that the relationship is herein correctly given. For just as certainly as the original apostasy created "Babylon the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth," just so certainly this apostasy in our day and in our country has created the har- lot daughters of " Babylon the mother." She is the mother only of "harlots and abominations." By positive statement it has been said of them and for them that they are her "Prof. Cbas. W. Shields, D. p., of Princeton Theological Seminary, N. J. "COME OUT OF HER, MY PEOPLE." 883 daughters. By silence they have confessed it, arid by action they have demonstrated it. And it is so. We are sorry ; but so it is. There is but one thing more that they can possibly do in this direction, and even this they will do ; that is, enter into alliance with satanic power itself, by joining hands with Spiritualism. This they will do as certainly as they have done that which they have done. Then will be completely fulfilled the prophecy which now is but partly fulfilled. Rev. xviii, 2, 3. Then also the world will hear that cry of the angel of the Lord which comes " mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her forni- cation, and the kings of the earth have committed fornica- tion with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies." At the same time there is "heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath re- membered her iniquities." Rev. xviii, 4, 5. Thank the Lord, there are yet some of the people of God in these churches. There are yet some Christians there ; but they can- not remain there much longer without becoming partakers of her sins. They cannot stay there much longer and remain Christians. They cannot stay there much longer without receiving of her plagues and of the judgments of God upon her iniquities. Her judgment cometh and hasteth greatly. " Strong is the Lord God that judgeth her." The yielding of the merchants to her boycott will do them no good, for it is written : " And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her ; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more : the merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and tine linen, and purple, 884 THE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine-wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble, and cinnamon, and odors, and ointments, and frankin- cense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men. And the fruits that thy soul lusted after are departed from thee, and all things which were dainty and goodly are departed from thee. and thou shalt find them no more at all. The merchants of these things which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weep- ing and wailing, and saying, Alas, alas, that great city that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls ! For in one hour so great riches is come to naught." Rev. xviii, 11-17. The popularity and patronage which legislators hope to have from pandering to her desires, will likewise do them no good, for it is written : "A mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all." Rev. xviii, 21. Such being the final result to the churches, of this course of evil in which they have even now gone so far, and the churches being one with the State in this course, it is in- evitable that the ruin of the churches will be the ruin also of the State. Therefore it is as plain as A, B, C, that this course upon which these churches have entered means the destruction of the State and the ruin of the nation. What they in their apostasy and bad ambition promise shall save the nation, only proves its speedy and awful ruin. This is certain. Not only is this evident from what has already been said, but this same thing has been worked out in the history of the Roman empire, for the instruction of all people and nations, showing clearly enough just what the result must be. In the case of the Roman empire, however, God made the savage nations of the North the instruments of his judg- ment in sweeping away the mass of corruption which the THE DAY OF THE LORD COMETH. 885 union of Church and State from the first great apostasy had built up there. But in this case where can any such instruments be found ? There are none. Civilization has encompassed the earth. Not only that, but in this case "// nations" are involved in the corruption. Where, then, shall the Lord find a people to execute his judgment and sweep away this mass of corruption ? For the reasons given, they cannot be found upon the earth. A people is found, how- ever, and here is the Lord's description of them : "Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain : let all the inhabitants of the land tremble : for the day of the Lord cometh, for it is nigh at hand: a day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds and of thick darkness, as the morning upon the mount- ains : a great people and a strong ; there hath not been ever ///6 like, neither shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations. A fire devoureth before them; and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them. The appearance of them is as the appearance of horses ; and as horsemen, so shall they run. Like the noise of chariots on the tops of mountains shall they leap like the noise of a flame of fire that devoureth the stubble, as a strong people set in battle array. Before their face the people shall be much pained : all faces shall gather blackness. They shall run like mighty men ; they shall climb the wall like men of war ; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their ranks : neither shall one thrust another ; they shall walk every one in his path ; and when they fall upon the sword, they shall not be wounded. They shall run to and fro in the city ; they shall run upon the wall, they shall climb up upon the houses ; they shall enter in at the windows like a thief. The earth shall quake before them ; the heavens shall tremble the sun and moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining : and the Lord shall utter his voice before his army : for his camp is very great : for he is strong that executeth his word : for the day of the Lord is great and very terrible ; and who can abide it ?" Joel ii, 1-11. "And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse ; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns ; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood : and THE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY. his name is called the Word of God. And the armies winch were in heaven followed him upon while horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations; and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS." "And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshiped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth : and all the fowls were filled with their flesh. Rev. xix, 11-16, 19-21. "And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. " Matt, xxiv, 31. " And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire : and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God. And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvelous are thy works, Lord God Almighty ; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints." Rev. xv, 2, 3. As the first great apostasy developed "the beast," so this second great apostasy as certainly develops "the image of the beast." Both are described in the thirteenth chapter of Revelation. In the first ten verses of that chapter there is given a description of the rise and career of a certain power under the symbol of "a beast." Then from the eleventh to the seventeenth verse inclusive, there is given the descrip- tion of another power under the symbol of " another beast" and "the image of the beast." The first of these powers is also designated as "the first beast" and "the beast which had the wound by a sword." The full description of the first one is as follows : - "And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy, And the beast DESCRIPTION OF THE PAPACY. 887 which I saw was like unlo a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth :is the mouth of a lion : and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast ? Who is able to make war with him ? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies ; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them : and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. If any man have an ear, let him hear. He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity : he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." Every person not a Catholic, who knows the A, B, C of history knows that this is a vivid sketch of the papacy and its career up to 1 708 A. i>. Every such person knows that the one great power to which all the nations have done homage the most, and for the longest time, is the papacy. Every such person knows that the most blasphemous power that was ever on the earth is the papacy. He likewise knows that the one power that has made war with the saints of God, and has overcome them the most cruelly, and has persecuted them the most widely and for the longest time, is the papacy. We know that to say this is not considered as proper Protestantism for these days ; but proper Protest- antism it is, nevertheless. For all this is true of the papacy, and has been true of it for ages. And everybody, Catholic, or non-Catholic, knows that the papacy is the union of Church and State, with the Church in possession of the power of the State to use in enforcing her decrees, and compelling men to submit to her dictation. The description of the '.'other beast," or the image of the beast, is as follows : 888 TEE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY. " And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and be had two horns like a lamb, and spake as a dragon. And lie exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, and de- ceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast ; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads : and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." This prophecy says that it would be said unto them that "they should make an image to the beast." This would be to make an image to the papacy. The papacy being a union of Church and State, with the Church using the power of the State to enforce the doctrines of the church and to compel submission to her decrees, the making of an image of this would be only to make or establish an order of things by which a union of Church and State would be created, with the civil power in the hands of the church to compel submis- sion to the church doctrines, and observance of church insti- tutions. But in order for this to be made, it must be that before this there was no union of Church and State in the place where this is to be done. As it is necessary to say "that they should make an image " of the papacy, that is, union of Church arid State, it is plain on the face of it that this is said and must be said, in a place where there is no union of Church and State, and where the church has no control of civil affairs and no connection with the civil power. Now where was there ever a place or a nation on earth in which there was no union of Church and State except in the United States alone ? With the single exception of the THE PLACE OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST. 889 United States government, there never was a government on earth, pagan, papal, or professed Protestant, in which from the beginning of its existence, as such, until this day, there was no union of religion and the State ; in which the relig- ious power had no control of, or connection with, the civil power. This is the truth, and any one may satisfy himself of it by thinking, whether little or much. This being the truth, it follows that in the United States is the only place on earth where it could be said that they should make a union of Church and State. Consequently, in the govern- ment of the United States alone could the image of the beast the image of the papacy be made. There are many other points corroborative of this, but this is sufficient for this place. Because of this prophecy of Rev. xiii, 11-17, it has been preached and published by the Seventh-day Adventists for more than forty years that there would be formed in the United States a union of Church and State, with national Sunday legislation that there would be made here an image of the papacy. For instance : more than forty years ago January, 1853 a little pamphlet of about seventy- five pages, perhaps 2 x 5 inches in size, was published, giving a brief exposition of Revelation 13, and especially that part in verses 11-17. On this point there was then written and printed the following : " The two-horned beast says to them that dwell on the earth, ' Make an image." The dwellers on the earth, or territory of this beast, it seems, have a part to act in this work. This clearly marks the United States as the scene of action. This is the manner in which laws are made here by the representatives of the people. As all men by the Declaration are declared to be equal, it became necessary that some course should be taken by which all could have equal privileges in the construction of the laws. If the whole mass were called together, there would be an end- less discussion and no laws made. Therefore the people were to elect such representatives as would carry out their principles ; and they were to meet and make laws, which, when passed, should be considered the laws of the people. The image is to be formed by the people or their rep- resentatives. 890 THE SECOND ORE AT APOSTASY. " It appears probable to us that this Sunday institution is the very point on which this union will be effected. Here is a point on which all Protestant sects can unite. A point which we may safely say is the im- portant item in the faith of Protestants is their Sunday worship. "Verse 15. 'And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.' From this text we may draw two conclusions : " 1. The image of the beast is to be made in the same territory where the two-horned beast rules ; for the two-horned beast can exer- cise that authority in no territory but its own. "2. That it already has it in its power to give life to the image of the beast, or cause the decree to be made and executed. Is it not in the power of the United States to pass such laws ? They declare ' all men shall be protected in worshiping God according to the dictates of their own consciences.' We see the mass hold the first day of the week as a holy day. If a memorial should be sent in to Congress with one million names signed to it, declaring that their rights were infringed upon, and praying them to pass a solemn enactment that the first day should not be profaned by labor, how soon the result would be a law upon the point ! "Were the United States, as a body, to pass a law that Sunday should be kept holy, or not profaned by labor, there would be, I conceive, an image to the papacy ; for the law would then be in the hands of the church, and she could inflict penalties on those who did not obey the Sunday institution." Bear in mind that on the strength of that scripture, this was printed in 1853. And no man can deny that in 1892 the very things were done which in this exposition of the proph- ecy were said would be done. The churches professedly representing millions of petitioners, did that year memo- rialize Congress with threats in behalf of Sunday sacredness; and how soon the result was a law upon the point ! Again : in 1884, this same denomination printed the following on the same prophecy Rev. xiii, 11-17 : "By this first beast is represented the Roman Church, an ecclesias- tical body clothed with civil power, having authority to punish all dis- senters. The image of the beast represents another religious body clothed with similar power. The formation of this image /* the work of that beast whose peaceful rise and mild professions render it so striking a symbol of the United States. Here is to be found an image of the THE MAKING OF THE IMAGE. 891 papacy. When the churches of our land, uniting upon such points of faith as are held by them in common, shall influence the State to enforce their decrees and sustain their institutions, then will Protestant America have formed an image of the Roman hierarchy." 9 This has been done. The churches of our land have united upon the Sunday issue, and then united with the Catholic Church itself, and in this unity they have influenced the State to enforce the church decree for Sunday observ- ance, and to sustain the church institution of Sunday. They have done it. And in the doing of it, they have made the living image of the papacy in this land. Nine years before this was done, we published that it would be done ; and now it has been done. On the strength of the prophecy we published that it would come ; and on the strength of facts, everybody may know that it has come. The prophecy is fulfilled. The image of the beast is made, and lives in the United States to-day. Once more : in 1885 this same people published on the same subject these words : "To secure popularity and patronage, legislators will yield to the demand for a Sunday law." l To secure the popularity and patronage which were put up at public auction by the churches, our nation's legislators assembled in Congress did yield to the demand for a Sun- day law. In the light and upon the strength of the prophecy, we published seven years before that they would do it. And now in their own words, we can publish and do publish, that they have done it. 11 The prophecy is fulfilled. The image of the beast is made, and lives, in the United States to-day. That which now remains is for it to go on and cause all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to re- 9 "Great Controversy," Vol. iv, p. 278. JO " Testimony, No. 32," p. 207. " Pages 07, 808. 892 THE SECOND ORE AT APOSTASY. ceive the mark of the beast, and carry on the general and universal boycott upon all who refuse to keep Sunday, by which no one may buy or sell save he that has the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. But upon this WHAT SAITH THE LORD ? "And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him ; for the hour of his judgment is come : and worhip him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters. "And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication. ''And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his fore- head, or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indigna- tion ; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb : and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up forever and ever : and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiv- eth the mark of his name. Here is the patience of the saints : here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. "And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth : Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labors ; and their works do follow them. And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle. And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap ; for the time is come for thee to reap ; for the harvest of the earth is ripe. And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth ; and the earth was reaped." -Rev. xiv, 6-16. Just here while all are to be compelled to worship the papacy and its image, and to receive its mark, the Lord sends the everlasting gospel to all, calling them to worship him alone, who made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters, for the hour of his judgment is come. THE SABBATH A SIGN OF GOD'S POWER. 893 And the sign which he himself has set up that men may know that he is the Lord, the true God, who made heaven and earth and the sea and the fountains of waters, is the Sabbath of the Lord. Ezek. xx, 20; Ex. xxxi, IT; xx, 8-11. There is also made the announcement of the fall of Babylon; and then the dreadful warning against obedience to the de- crees of the papacy anywhere, or its image here in the United States. And the next thing that follows is the coming of the Lord to reap the harvest of the earth. And the harvest is the end of the world. Matt, xiii, 39. And this is how we have krunon all these years that there would be a union of Church and State formed in the United States with national Sunday legislation. This is why we have been telling the people by voice and pen, in every place and in every way, all these years, that this was coming. Now it is here, and no man can deny it. Here are the words which we published years ago that it would come, and no man can deny that. Men may disbelieve it, but they cannot deny it; they may reject it, but they cannot disprove it. While we were telling it, many would not believe it, and said it would never come. We knew it, and published that it would come. Now it has come. It is here. And this demonstrates unmistakably that we were right. To all these we now say, Come now and stand with us, that you may be in the right now on this great question. The apostasy of Protestantism exalts the papacy, because this is an open confession to the world that the papal princi- ples alone are correct. The making of the image to the beast restores and magnifies the power of the beast. Rev. xiii, 12. This, as pointed out on page 7r>9, brings about the situation described in Rev. xiii, 8. And this in turn de- velops the fulfillment of Rev. xviii, 8. The scheme of Leo XIII, as stated on pages 844, 845, is thus caused to succeed. The kings and nations that have been separated from her, are drawn back into illicit connection with her ; once more she guides and dominates the nations. Consequently she 894 THE SECOND GEE AT APOSTASY. glorifies herself and lives deliciously ; the kings of the earth commit fornication and live deliciously with her, as did the false prophets with Jezebel of old ; and therefore she con- gratulates herself, saying in her heart, "I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow." And saith the Lord: "Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine ; and she shall be utterly burned with fire ; for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her." Yerse 9. The apostasy of Protestantism restores and exalts the papacy, and so assures the success of Leo's scheme. Leo's scheme embraces Ameriga, and through this Europe, and through these, "all humanity;" in short.it embraces the world. This is precisely the thing that the prophecy an- nounced long ago that the papacy would do. The success of this scheme marks the perdition, and absolute ruin, of the papacy. This ruin therefore of the papacy marks the ruin of the world, the end of the reign of evil, the perfect reign of righteousness the complete annihilation of the mystery of iniquity and the everlasting triumph of the mystery of God. Rev. xvi, 17-19 ; xviii and xix. The movements, both earthly and heavenly which are to accomplish this eternal consummation are now in active progress before the eyes of all the world. In the very latest days of the closing up of these pages for the press, there has occurred in the progress of Leo's scheme that which is worthy of note at this point in our book. A short dispatch dated Baltimore, Md., September 21, 1894, announcing the arrival from Rome, of Bishop Keane, Rector of the Catholic University at Washington, D. C., reported from the Bishop the following : " In speaking of the relations of the Quirinal [the Italian Capitol] to the Vatican, Bishop Keane said that the policy of the pope, in view of the recent overtures in Italy, is the union of tlie church with the great democratic powers of the future that is America and France. This is his hope, and toward it all his remarkable energies are bent." 1Z 12 Chicago Herald, September 22, 1894. THE UNITED STATES "A CATHOLIC NATION"! 895 And in a long dispatch dated at New York three days later, September 24, it is stated that Bishop Keane was ''the bearer of a rescript from Pope Leo XIII," of which the purport is given in the following words : " The papal rescript elevates the United States to the first rank as a Catholic nation. Heretofore this country has stood before the church as a ' missionary ' country. It had no more recognition officially at Home than had China. ... By the new rescript the country is freed from the propaganda and is declared to l>e a Catholic country in wl\ose people the pope has amplest confidence and on whom he confers the rights of self-government, subject only to the holy see on matters of faith. In a way this remarkable action of the Roman pontiff may be looked on as the most astonishing of all the stupendous effects wrought in the world by the American republic. The United States is considered by the pope as the most promising field in the world for the church." "The importance, not only to Catholics, but to all citizens of the United States, of this radical change in the relations to Rome of the church in America, can scarcely be overestimated. It is a declaration of independence for American Catholics. It is in effect giving the official sanction of the infallible head of the church to the principles and policy preached and practised by Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop Ireland, Bishops Spalding, Keane and others of the ' American school ' among the Catholic hierarchy. It is a decision declaring as acceptable to Catholic faith the American idea of total separation of Church and State"! !^ What the pope means by the "total separation of Church and State " was defined by Bishop Keane at the University, September 23, 1894, in the following words : " The world he [Leo XIII1 likens to the man, in that the Church represents the soul, and the State the body." u These things, in view of the situation and aims of the papacy as set forth on pages 838-850 of this book, show a marked and rapid progress. The course of this progress from its present stage to the consummation can be well and easily traced by carefully 13 Lansing (Mich.) Republican, September 24, 1894. " Catholic Standard, October 13, 1S94, page 2, second column. 65 896 THE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY. reviewing pages 109-520 of this history. For there is seen the development and working of the beast ; and this which is now to be fully developed and to work is the-living like- ness, image, of the beast. He who would readily recognize the likeness must study the original. CONCLUSION. As for us, our position is and shall continue to be pre- cisely what it always has been. We propose to worship Him alone who made the heaven and the earth, and the sea and the fountains of waters. We propose to heed faithfully the message from God warning against the worship of the beast and his image and receiving his mark or the number of his name. We say forever : "Nay, we will not regard the institution of the beast." We know that in this contest there is, and will be, ar- rayed against us all the power that earth knows, with this power under the direction of the papacy, and the whole combination stirred up and urged on by Satan from beneath. But above all this we ~know, and are glad in the knowledge that Jesus Christ is with us, and he has said to us, "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, . . . and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world." Christ has said it. It is so, and we know it. Therefore though all the power that earth knows be arrayed against us, we shall come off more than con- querors through him that hath loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood. So that we may boldly say, "The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me." We know that we shall be reproached. We know that we shall be denounced. We know that "anarchist," "in- fidel," " atheist," and every other opprobrious epithet will be applied to us. We know that we shall be despised, and WHAT SHALL WE DOf 897 that we shall be even the despised of the despised. We know that we shall be counted, and made, of no reputation. But we rest perfectly easy in our trust in Him, and our com- plete dependence upon him who "made himself of no repu- tation-," in order that we might have his matchless character. We know that we shall have no reputation. But ah ! we know that we have the divine character of Jesus Christ, which is well pleasing to God. For ''now the righteous- ness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets ; even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe." And we do believe in him, the glorious Son of God. It is not true that "the dearest treasure that mor- tal times afford, is spotless reputation.'' It is everlastingly and infinitely true that the dearest treasure that either mor- tal or immortal times afford, is spotless diameter. And that is alone the character of Jesus Christ, which was wrought out in his humiliation. That character is ours as an ever- lasting gift by faith in him. Men may take away our repu- tation. But we do not care for that, as we have a character which they cannot touch, for it is the gift of God. We know that a general boycott will be placed against us by which we can neither buy nor sell, nor conduct any business. But for this we do not care. For " ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear ; but ye have re- ceived the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God : and if children, then heirs : heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together." Rom. viii, 15-17. "Joint heirs with Christ" are we. Of what is he heir? God hath appointed him "heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds." Heb. i, 2. He being heir of all things, and we being joint heirs with him, we there- fore are just as certainly heirs of all things as is he. And so he tells us, "All things are yours; whether Paul, or 898 TEE SECOND GREAT APOSTASY. Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come ; all are yours ; and ye are Christ's; and Christ is God's." 1 Cor. iii, 21-23. So when they take away from us all things of earth, we still have left all things in heaven and earth. And God has promised that our bread shall not fail ; but that bread shall be given us, and our waters shall be sure. Isa. li, 12-14 ; xxxiii, 16. We know that the time wjll come when men will think that he that killeth us will be doing God service. And we know indeed that a decree will go forth that we shall even be killed. But for this we do not care. For "this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life." And we have him. He gave himself a free gift to us, and he is ours. Christ is our life, and our life is hid with Christ in God, and no man can touch it. Therefore we fear not them who can kill the body, but after that have no more that they can do. Christ is our life. He is the Life-giver. And he can and will raise the dead. Christ, Christ is our refuge, our hope, our confidence, our power, our righteousness, our wealth, our life. And we stand in this contest with no other calculation nor con- sideration. So we are not at all uneasy, nor any way in doubt as to the outcome. We knew that this was coming, which has come. We know that the rest of the events which we have pointed out as connected with this, will come, as surely as this already has come. And we know that the culmination of all these events is that grand, triumphant scene, in which the prophet "saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire : and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God. And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and OUR VICTORY SURE. 89 marvelous are thy works, Lord God Almighty ; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints. Who shall not fear thee, O Lord, and glorify thy name? for thou only art holy : for all nations shall come and worship before thee ; for thy judgments are made manifest." Rev. xv, 2-4. This is what we have in view. This victory, this triumph is promised to us ; and it will surely come. For it we wait patiently and confidently. And to all the people we say as did David to Abiathar : "Abide thou with us, fear not ; for he that seeketh our lives seeketh thy life : but with us thou shalt be in safeguard." 1 Sam. xxii, 23. " Come thou with us, and we will do thee good : for the Lord hath spoken good concerning Israel." mRMFRITRN SFNTTNFI An Eight-page Weekly Journal, de- 111 ILUlUin JLHlini-L. voted to the defence of American insti- tutions, the preservation of the United States Constitution ns it is, BO far as regards re- ligion or religious tests, and the maintenance of human rights, both civil and religious. Edited by ALONZO T. JONES. It will ever be uncompromisingly opposed to anything tending toward a union of Church and State, whether in name or in fact. Single Copy, per year, post-paid, - - $1.00 In clubs of ten or more copies, per year, each, ' .75 To foreign countries, single subscription, post-paid, 5s. Address, AMERICAN SENTINEL, 43 Bond Street, New York. THE NRTIONRL SflNDRY LflW This pamphlet contains the - me nmiumu. jununi Lnw. g umeil t s mbchaif or the rights of American citizens, and in opposition to the Blair Sunday-rest bill, which Alonzo T. Jones presented before the Senate Committee on Education and Labor, Dec. 13, 1888. Mr. Crafts has pronounced the report as published as "mighty interesting read- ing." And Mr. Jones's comments make it more so. His argument is enlarged to what it would have been without Senator Blair's interruptions, objections, and counter-argu- ments, and is accompanied with answers to all of his objections and counter-arguments. As the Sunday question is now a living issue, this treatise will be interesting to all classes, especially legislators, lawyers, judges, and other public men. The argument is based on Scripture and history, constitution and law, showing the limits of the civil power, the unconstitutionality of the Sunday bill, an analysis of tlie Sunday laws and other religious legislation of the different States, the Sunday-law movement of the fourth century, and the Sunday-law movement of the nineteenth century. The methods used in securing indorsements to the petition for the Blair bill, and the workings of such Sunday-laws as are proposed for the United States. The work contains 192 paires, and will be sent post-paid on receipt of '25 cents. Address the publishers of " Two Republics." THF CRFHT mNTROUFR^vY Revised and enlarged to over TOO oc. inc uncm iunii\uuci\ji tavo pageSi handgomely boundt with 38 full-page illustrations. Cloth, $2.25; gilt edges, $2.75; library, $3.00; half morocco, $3.50; full morocco, $1.50. Those who desire to follow further the subject treated in " The Two Republics," will find in "The Great Controversy " (issued by the name publishers) nn excellent account of that which is to follow, with much other matter of absorbing interest, and worthy of careful study. RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LIBRARY. A monthly publication (with occasional extras) published by the INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS LIBERTY ASSOCIATION. The following have been issued : No. 1. Due Process of Law and the Divine Right of Dissent. A review of Judge Hammond's decision in the King case. By A. T. Jones. 120 pages. Price 15 cts. No. 2. Religious Intolerance in the Republic. A portrayal of recent persecutions in Tennessee. 16 pages. Price 2 cts. No. 3. Church and State. By James T. Ringgold, of the Baltimore Bar. 60 pages. Price 10 cts. No. 4. The National Sunday Law. Arguments by A. T. Jones in opposition to the Blair Sunday-rest Bill. 192 pages. Price 25 cts. No. 5. Sunday Laws in the United States. By James T. Ringgold. 24 pages. Price 3 cts. No. 6. The Captivity of the Republic. 128 pages. Price 15 cts. No. 7. Appeal and Remonstrance. 24 pages. Price 3 cts. No. 8. Appeal from the U. S. Supreme Court Decision Making this a " Christian Nation." A Protest. By A. T. Jones. 86 pages. Price 15 cts. No. 10. Religious Liberty and the Mormon Question. 20 pages. Price 2^ cts. No. 11. The " Civil Sabbath ; " or Disguised Religious Legislation. 12 pp. Price 1% cts. No. 12. The Columbian Year, and the Meaning of the Four Centuries. 44 pages. Price, 5*4 cts. No. 13. The Limits of Civil Authority. 12 pages. Price i^ cts. No. 14. Christ and the Sabbath. 4 pages. Price 5 cts. No. 15. Rome's Challenge : Why Do Protestants Keep Sunday ? 40 pages. Price 5 cts. No. 16. Our Answer : Why do Seventh-day Adventists Suffer Imprisonment Rather than Keep Sunday? By A. F. Ballenger. 12 pages. Price i 1 /, cts. No. 18. Christ and the Pharisees; or, Christ's Faithfulness in Sabbath-keeping. 40 pages. Price 5 cts. No. 19. Protestantism, True and False. 32 pages. Price 4 cts. No. 20. Civil Government and Religion. 182 pages. Price 25 cts. No. 21. Congress on Sunday Legislation. 16 pages. Price i^ cts. No. 22. The Legal Sunday : Its History and Character. 260 pages. Price 40 cts. The same in cloth, 75 cts. No. 23. The Sabbath Question in the Dominion Parliament, as viewed by Hon. G. Amyot, M. P. 12 pages. Price ij^ cts. No. 24. What Do These Things Mean ? The true meaning of the present unsettled condition of "Capital and Labor," finances, etc. 20 pages. Price 2% cts. No. 25. "The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary." 16 pages. Price 2 CtS. No. 26. The Puritan Sabbath for " Physical Rest." 12 pages. Price i^ cts. No. 27. Religious Persecution, or the " Blue Laws" Revived. 60 pages. Price 8 cts. No. 28. Now in Jail for Conscience' Sake. 8 pages. Price i ct. No. 29. Papacy and Prophecy, or the " Sovereign Pontiff " and the Church of Rome, by L. Gaussen, Professor of Theology. 32 pages. Price, 4 cts. No 30. Papacy and Persecution, or Did the Roman Catholic Church Ever Persecute? By C. P. Bollman. 16 pages. Price 2 cts. , Ansiual subscription to the Library, Ji. Liberal discounts on any of the numbers in quantities and to the trade. 23952