^PLANTATIONS 
 
 8N BOOK SHOP 
 
 Sec 
 
 Shelf... 
 No 
 
 3460
 
 i8p e. p. Supple. 
 
 WORKS. 9 vols, gilt top, the set, $i3.s». 
 
 LITERATURE AND LIFE. i2mo,gilt top, $1.30. 
 
 ESSAYS AND REVIEWS. 2 vols. 121110, gilt top, I3.00. 
 
 CHARACTER AND CHARACTERISTIC MEN. umo, 
 gilt top, Si. 50. 
 
 SUCCESS AND ITS CONDITIONS. i2mo, gilt top, 
 $i.5°- 
 
 THE LITERATURE OF THE AGE OF ELIZABETH. 
 i2mo, gilt top, $1.50. 
 
 OUTLOOKS ON SOCIETY, LITERATURE, AND POLI- 
 TICS. Crown 8vo, gilt top, $1.50. 
 
 AMERICAN LITERATURE, and Other Papers. With 
 an Introductory Note by Whittikr. Crown 8vo, gilt 
 top, $1.50. 
 
 RECOLLECTIONS OF EMINENT MEN, with Other 
 Papers. With Portrait, and Introduction by the Rev. 
 C. A. Bartol. Crown 8vo, gilt top, #1.50. 
 
 HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY, 
 Boston and New York.
 
 CHARACTER 
 AND CHARACTERISTIC MEN 
 
 EDWIN P. WHIPPLE 
 
 BOSTON AXO NEW YORK 
 HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY
 
 Copyright, 1866 and 1894, 
 
 By TICKNOR AND FIELDS, 
 
 AMD HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & CO. 
 
 All rights reserved.
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 SANTA BARBARA 
 
 TO 
 
 THE MEMORY 
 <w 
 
 THOMAS STARR KING, 
 
 Ztys Volume 
 
 IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED.
 
 PREFACE, 
 
 The essays in tho present volume were writ- 
 ten at various times, and without any view to 
 their connected publication ; but they all more 
 or less illustrate one idea of the nature, growth, 
 and influence of character. With the exception 
 of those on Thackeray, Hawthorne, and Agassiz, 
 they were ail originally delivered as lectures or 
 addresses, and the style doubtless exhibits that 
 perpetual scepticism as to the patience of au- 
 diences which torments the lecturer during the 
 brief hour in which he attempts to hold their 
 attention. The first six of the essays, with the 
 exception of that on Intellectual Character, were 
 published in Harper's Magazine, between July 
 and November, 1857, and the paper on Agassi* 
 was also contributed to that periodical. As most 
 of the essays were written before the Rebellion,
 
 VI PREFACE. 
 
 some of the opinions expressed in them look an- 
 tiquated as seen in the light of recent events. 
 This is particularly true of the discourse on the 
 American Mind, which is only now reprinted be- 
 cause it contains some remarks on national char* 
 acter that could not well be omitted. 
 
 Boston, July, 1866.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 ♦ ■ 
 
 Pas 
 
 L Character J 
 
 II. Eccentric Character .... 35 
 
 ILL Intellectual Character ... 66 
 
 IV. Heroic Character .... 96 
 
 V. The American Mind . . .129 
 
 VI. The English Mind .... 165 
 
 VII. Thackeray 197 
 
 Vm. Nathaniel Hawthorne . . . 218 
 
 IX. Edward Everett 243 
 
 X. Thomas Starr Kino .... 258 
 
 XI. Agassiz 266 
 
 xh washington and the principles of the 
 
 Revolution . , 291
 
 CHARACTER. 
 
 IT is impossible to cast the most superficial glanc* 
 over the community, without being impressed by 
 the predominance of associated over individual action, 
 and of people over persons. Few dare to announce un- 
 welcome truth, or even to defend enthusiastic error, 
 without being backed by some sect, party, association, 
 or clique ; and, thus sustained, the effort is in danger 
 of subsiding from a duty into a pleasure or passion. It 
 might be supposed that this companionable thinking,— 
 this moral or religious power owned in joint stock, — 
 would at least operate against egotism and the vices of 
 capricious individualism ; but, practically, it is apt to 
 result in self-admiration through mutual admiration; 
 to pamper personal pride without always developing a 
 personality to be proud of; and to raise the market 
 price of mediocrity by making genius and heroism 
 imall and cheap. Formerly, to attack a community 
 intrenched in laws, customs, institutions, and beliefs, re- 
 quired dauntless courage a soul sublimed by an idea
 
 2 CHARACTER. 
 
 above the region of vanity and conceit; a character 
 resolutely facing responsibilities it clearly realized ; and 
 especially a penetrating vision into the spirit and heart 
 of the objects assailed. T'lis last characteristic is in- 
 sisted upon by all the authorities. " There is nothing 
 so terrible as activity without insight," says Goethe. 
 " I would open every one of Argus's hundred eyes be- 
 fore I used one of Briareus's hundred hands," says 
 Lord Bacon. " Look before you leap," says John 
 Smith, all over the world. But it is too much the 
 mistake of many hopeful people of our day to consider 
 organized institutions, which had their origin in the 
 vices or necessities of human nature, to possess no 
 authority over the understanding if they happen to 
 contradict certain abstract truisms, and a still greater 
 mistake to suppose that these institutions will yield to a 
 proclamation of opinions or a bombardment of words. 
 
 It being then evident that institutions can be success- 
 fully attacked only by forces kindred in nature to those 
 by which they were originally organized, the question 
 arises, What is it that really forms and reforms insti- 
 tutions, communicates life and movement to society, 
 and embodies thoughts in substantial facts? The an- 
 swer is, in one word, Character ; and this conducts us 
 at once beneath the sphere of associated and merely 
 mechanical contrivances into the region of personal an<7
 
 CHARACTER. 8 
 
 vital forces. It is character which gives authority to 
 opinions, puts virile meaning into words, and burns its 
 way through impediments insurmountable to the large 
 in brain who are weak in heart ; for character indicates 
 the degree in which a man possesses creative spiritual 
 energy ; is the exact measure of his real ability ; is, in 
 Bhort, the expression, and the only expression, of the 
 man, — the person. His understanding and sensibility 
 may play with thoughts and coquet with sentiments, 
 and his conscience flirt with beautiful ideals of good- 
 ness, and this amateur trifling he may call by some fine 
 name or other ; but it is the centre and heart of his 
 being, the source whence spring living ideas and living 
 deeds, which ever determines his place when we esti- 
 mate him as a power. The great danger of the con- 
 servative is his temptation to surrender character and 
 trust in habits ; the great danger of the radical is his 
 temptation to discard habits without forming character. 
 One is liable to mental apathy, the other to mental an- 
 archy ; and apathy and anarchy are equally destitute 
 >t causative force and essential individuality. 
 
 As character is thus the expression of no particular 
 quality or faculty, but of a whole nature, it reveals of 
 tourse, a man's imperfections in revealing his greatness. 
 He is nothing unless he acts ; and, as in every vitai 
 thought and deed character appears, his acts must par
 
 { CHARACTER. 
 
 rtike of bis infirmities, and the mental and moral life 
 communicated in them be more or less diseased. As 
 he never acts from opinions or propositions, his nature 
 cannot be hidden behind such thin disguises, the fatal 
 evidence against him being in the deed itself. If there 
 be sensuality, or malignity, or misanthropy in him, it 
 will come out in his actions, though his tongue drop 
 purity and philanthropy in every word. Probably 
 more hatred, licentiousness, and essential impiety are 
 thus communicated through the phraseology and con- 
 tortions of their opposites, than in those of vice itself. 
 Moral life is no creation of moral phrases. The words 
 that are truly vital powers for good or evil are only 
 those which, as Pindar says, " the tongue draws up 
 from the deep heart." 
 
 Now, as men necessarily communicate themselves 
 when they produce from their vital activity, it follows 
 that their productions will never square with the ab- 
 stract opinions of the understanding, but present a con- 
 crete, organic whole, compounded of truth and error, 
 evil and good, exactly answering to the natures whence 
 they proceed. This actual process of creation we are 
 prone to ignore or overlook, and to criticise institutions 
 as Rymer and Dennis criticised poems, that is, ai 
 though they were the manufactures of mental and 
 moral machines, working on abstract principles ; where-
 
 OHARACTEB. 6 
 
 ts creaiiou on such a method is impossible, and we are 
 compelled to choose between imperfect organisms ana 
 nothing. That this imperfection is not confined to 
 jurists and legislators is sufficiently manifest when 
 the vehement and opinionated social critic undertakes 
 the work of demolition and reconstruction, and all the 
 vices peculiar to his own nature, such as his intolerance 
 of facts and disregard of the rights and feelings of oth- 
 ers, have an opportunity of displaying themselves. His 
 talk is fine, and his theories do him honor ; but when 
 he comes to act as a man, when he comes to exhibit 
 what he *is as well as what he thinks, it is too com- 
 monly found that four months of the rule of so-called 
 philosophers and philanthropists are enough to make 
 common men sigh for their old Bourbons and Bo 
 napartes. Robespierre, anarchist and philanthropist, 
 Frederick of Prussia, despot and philosopher, were 
 both bitter and vitriolic natures, yet both, in their 
 youth, exceeded Exeter Hall itself in their professions 
 of universal beneficence, and evinced, in their rants, not 
 hypocrisy, but self-delusion. Frederick indeed wrote 
 jarly in life a treatise called " The Anti-Machiavel, 
 which was," says his biographer, "an edifying homily 
 against rapacity, perfidy, arbitrary government, unjust 
 war ; in short, against almost everything for which iU 
 author is now remembered among men."
 
 CHARACTER. 
 
 Thus tc the pride of reason and vanity of opinion 
 character interposes its iron limitations, declaring war 
 against all forms and modes of pretension, and affording 
 the right measure of the wisdom and folly, the right- 
 eousness and the wickedness, substantially existing in 
 persons and in communities of persons. Let us now 
 consider this power in some of the varieties of its man- 
 ifestation, observing the law of its growth and influ- 
 ence and the conditions of its success. Our purpose 
 will rather be to indicate its radical nature than to 
 treat of those superficial peculiarities which many deem 
 to be its essential elements. 
 
 The question has been often raised, whether charac- 
 ter be the creation of circumstances, or circumstances 
 the creation of character. Now, to assert that circum- 
 stances create character is to eliminate from character 
 that vital causative energy which is its essential char- 
 acteristic ; and to assert that circumstances are the 
 creation of character, is to endow character with the 
 power not only to create, but to furnish the materials 
 of creation. The result of both processes would not 
 be character, but caricature. The truth seems to be, 
 that circumstances are the nutriment of character, the 
 food which it converts into blood ; and this process of 
 assimilation presupposes individual power to act upon 
 tircumstances. Goethe says, in reference to his owl
 
 CHARACTER. J 
 
 mental growth and productiveness, " Every one of my 
 writings has been furnished to me by a thousand differ- 
 ent persons, a thousand different things. The learned 
 and the ignorant, the wise and the foolish, infancy and 
 age, have come in turn — generally without the least 
 suspicion of it — to bring me the offering of their 
 thoughts, their faculties, their experience. Often they 
 have sowed the harvest I have reaped. My work is 
 that of an aggregate of beings taken from the whole of 
 nature ; it bears the name of Goethe." Yes, it bears 
 the name of Goethe, because Goethe assimilated all 
 this knowledge and all this aggregate of beings into 
 Goethe, — broadening, enriching, and deepening his in- 
 dividuality, but not annihilating it ; so that his charac- 
 ter became as comprehensive as his experience. 
 
 Indeed, in all the departments of life, meditative and 
 practical, success thus depends on a thorough knowl- 
 edge, proceeding from a complete assimilation, of all 
 the circumstances connected with each department, — 
 the man standing for the thing, having mastered and, 
 as it were, consumed it, so that all its forces are in 
 himself as personal power and personal intelligence. 
 The true merchant, the true statesman, the true mili- 
 tary commander, the true artist, becomes a man of 
 character only vzLen he " puts on," and identifies hini- 
 lelf with, his particular profession or art. Balzac
 
 8 CHARACTER. 
 
 thought he could not describe a landscape until he had 
 turned himself for the moment into trees, and grass, 
 and fountains, and stars, and effects of sunlight, and 
 thus entered into the heart and life of the objects he 
 ached to reproduce. Nelson realized with such inten- 
 sity the inmost secrets of his profession, that experience 
 and study had in him been converted into intuition, so 
 that he could meet unexpected contingencies with in- 
 stinctive expedients. If he failed, through lack of 
 means, to snatch all the possible results of victory, his 
 unrealized conception tortured him more than a sabre 
 cut or a shattered limb. At the Battle of the Nile 
 many French ships escaped because he had no frigates 
 ! o pursue them. In his despatches he writes : " Should 
 I die this moment, ' want of frigates ' would be found 
 written on my heart ! " 
 
 With this view of character as the embodiment of 
 things in persons, it is obviously limited in its sphere 
 to the facts and laws it has made its own, and out of 
 that sphere is comparatively feeble. Thus, many able 
 lawyers and generals have been blunderers as states 
 men ; and one always shudders for the health of the 
 community when the name of a statesman or clergy- 
 man — properly authoritative in his special department 
 — is employed to recommend some universal panacea 
 ir some aqueou& establishment for washing away the
 
 CHARACTER. 9 
 
 diseases of the world. Character speaks with author- 
 ity only of those matters it has realized, and in respect 
 to them its dogmatisms are reasons and its opinions 
 are judgments. When Mr. Webster, in attacking a 
 legal proposition of an opponent at the bar, was re- 
 minded that he was assailing a dictum of Lord Cam- 
 den, he turned to the Court, and after paying a tribute 
 to Camden's greatness as a jurist, simply added, " But 
 may it please your Honor, / differ from Lord Cam 
 den." It is evident that such self-assertion would have 
 been ridiculous had not the character of the man re. 
 lieved it from all essential pretension ; but if the cas« 
 had been one of surgery or theology, and Mr. Webster 
 had emphasized his " ego" in a difference with Sir Ast- 
 ley Cooper or Hooker, the intrusion of his " I " would 
 have been an impertinence which his reputation as a 
 statesman or lawyer could not have shielded from con- 
 tempt. Indeed, injustice is often done to the real mer 
 its of eminent men when they get enticed out of then 
 strongholds of character, and venture into unaccus- 
 tomed fields of exertion, where their incapacity is soon 
 detected. Macaulay has vividly shown how Hastings, 
 the most vigorous and skilful of English statesmen in 
 India, blundered the moment he applied the experienca 
 he had acquired in Bengal to English politics ; and that 
 perfection in one profession does not imply even cony
 
 10 CHARACTER. 
 
 mon judgment outside of it, was painfully demonstrated 
 a few years ago, in the case of an accomplished Amer* 
 ican general, among whose splendid talents writing 
 English does not appear to be one. "When, therefore, 
 not content to leave his prodigies of strategy and tac- 
 tics to speak for themselves, he invaded the domair 
 of rhetoric, and crossed pens with Secretary Marcy, 
 people began to imagine, as verbs went shrieking about 
 after nouns, and relative pronouns could find no rela- 
 tions, that the great general had no character at all. 
 
 But confine a characteristic man to the matters he 
 has really mastered, and there is in him no blundering, 
 no indecision, no uncertainty, but a straightforward, 
 decisive activity, sure as insight and rapid as instinct. 
 You cannot impose upon him by nonsense of any kind, 
 however prettily you may bedizen it in inapplicable 
 eloquence. Thus Jeremiah Mason — a man who was 
 not so much a lawyer as he was law embodied — was 
 once engaged to defend a clergyman accused of a 
 capital crime, and was repeatedly bothered by the 
 attempts of the brethren to make him substitute theo- 
 logical for legal evidence. As he was making out his 
 brief, one of these sympathizers with the prisoner 
 rushed joyously into the room, with the remark that 
 
 Brother A was certainly innocent, for an angel 
 
 from heaven had appeared to him the night before, and
 
 CHARACTER. 11 
 
 had given him direct assurance of the fact. " That is 
 very important evidence, indeed," was the gruff reply 
 of Mason ; " but can you subpoena that angel ? " The 
 anecdote we mention because it is representative ; for 
 the philosophy which prompted such a demand annu- 
 ally saves thousands of merchants, manufacturers, and 
 farmers from rushing into ruinous speculations, and 
 preserves society itself from dissolving into a mere 
 anarchy of fanaticisms. The resistance doubtless 
 comes, in many cases, from stupidity ; but then stu- 
 pidity is a great conservative power, especially in those 
 periods of moral flippancy and benevolent persiflage 
 when it rains invitations to square the circle, to under- 
 take voyages to the moon, and to peril the existence of 
 solid realities on the hope of establishing a millennium 
 on their ruins. 
 
 As the perfection of character depends on a man's 
 embodying the facts and laws of his profession to such 
 i degree of intensity that power and intelligence are 
 combined in his activity, it is evident that mere unas 
 «imilated knowledge — knowledge that does not form 
 part of the mind, but is attached to it — will often 
 blunder as badly as ignorance itself. Thus Marshal 
 Bsrflner enjoyed for some time the reputation of plan- 
 ning Napoleon's battles, and of being a better general 
 than his master, — an impression which his cwn conceit
 
 12 CHARACTER. 
 
 doubtless readily indorsed ; but the illusion was dis- 
 pelled in the campaign of 1809, when Napoleon senl 
 him on in advance to assume the command. It took 
 him but a marvellously short time to bring the army to 
 the brink of destruction, and his incompetency was so 
 glaring that some of the marshals mistook it for treach- 
 Bry. Instead of concentrating the forces, he dispersed 
 them over a field of operations forty leagues in extent, 
 and exposed them to the danger of being destroyed in 
 detail, thinking all the while that he was exhibiting 
 singular depth ofjnilitary genius; when, in fact, it was 
 only the opportune arrival of Napoleon, and his fierce, 
 swift orders for immediate concentration, that saved 
 the army from disgraceful dispersion and defeat, — 
 an army which, under Napoleon, soon occupied Vienna, 
 and eventually brought the campaign to a victorious 
 conclusion at Wagram. 
 
 It is, however, the misfortune of nations that such 
 men as Berthier are not always tested by events, and 
 the limitations of their capacity plainly revealed. 
 Besides, it must be admitted that, in practical politics, 
 circumstances sometimes lift into power small-minded 
 natures, who are exactly level to the prejudices of their 
 time, and thus make themselves indispensable to it. 
 Mr. Addington, by the grace of intolerance made for a 
 ihort period Prime Minister of England, — a man of
 
 CHARACTER. 13 
 
 peat force of self-consequence, and great variety of 
 demerit, — was one of these fortunate echoes of char- 
 acter; and as his littleness answered admirably to all 
 that was little in the nation, he was, during his whole 
 life, an important element of party power. Canning 
 used despairingly to say of him, that u he was like the 
 Bmall-pox, — every administration had to take him 
 once." No party ever succeeded that did not thus 
 represent the public nonsense as well as the public 
 sense ; and happy is that body of politicians where one 
 of the members relieves his associates of all fear for 
 their safety, not by his vigor or sagacity in administra- 
 tion, but by his being one in whom the public nonsense 
 knows it can confide. Indeed, Sydney Smith declares 
 that every statesman who is troubled by a rush of ideas 
 to the head should have his foolometer ever by his 
 side, to warn him against offending or outstriding pub- 
 lic opinion. This foolometer is as necessary to des- 
 potic as to liberal governments ; for one great secret 
 of the art of politics all over the world is, never to 
 push evil or beneficent measures to that point where 
 resistance commences on the part of the governed. 
 
 Character, in its intrinsic nature, being thus the 
 embodiment of things in persons, the quality which 
 most distinguishes men of character from men of pas- 
 u'ons and opinions is Persistency, tenacity of hold upon
 
 14 CHARACTER. 
 
 their work, and power to continue in it. This quality 
 is the measure of the force inherent in character, and 
 is the secret of tho confidence men place in it, — > 
 Boldiers in generals, parties in leaders, people in 
 Btatesmen. Indeed, if we sharply scrutinize the lives 
 of persons eminent in any department of action or 
 meditation, we shall find that it is not so much bril 
 liancy and fertility as constancy and continuousness 
 of effort which make a man great. This is as true of 
 Kepler and Newton as of Hannibal and Caesar; of 
 Shakespeare and Scott as of Howard and Clarkson. 
 The heads of such men are not merely filled with 
 ideas, purposes, and plans, but the primary character- 
 istic of their natures and inmost secret of their success 
 is this : that labor cannot weary, nor obstacles discour- 
 age, nor drudgery disgust them. The universal line 
 of distinction between the strong and the weak is, that 
 one persists ; the other hesitates, falters, trifles, and at 
 last collapses or " caves in." 
 
 This principle obtains in every department of affairs 
 and every province of thought. Even in social life, 
 it is persistency which attracts confidence more than 
 talents and accomplishments. Lord Macaulay was the 
 most brilliant, rapid, and victorious of talkers, — inex- 
 haustible in words and in matter, — so endless, indeed 
 that on those rare occasions when he allowed others ta
 
 CHARACTER 15 
 
 put in an occasional word, he was hit by Sydney 
 Smith's immortal epigram, complimenting his " flashes 
 of silence " ; but in character, and in the influence that 
 radiates from character, he was probably inferior to his 
 taciturn father, Zachary Macaulay, who, with an iron 
 grasp of an unpopular cause, and a soul which was felt 
 as inspiration in whatever company he appeared, had 
 still hardly a word to spare. The son conversed, but 
 the mere presence of the father was conversation. 
 The son excited admiration by what he said, the father 
 wielded power and enforced respect and became the 
 object to which the conversation of the circle referred, 
 in virtue of what he was, and of what everybody knew 
 he would persist in being. 
 
 In politics, again, no mere largeness of comprehen 
 sion or loftiness of principle will compensate for a lack 
 of persistency to bear, with a mind ever fresh and a 
 purpose ever fixed, all the toil, dulness, fret, and dis- 
 appointment of the business ; and this is perhaps the 
 reason that, in politics, the perseverance of the sinners 
 makes us blush so often for the pusillanimity of the 
 faints. So, in wai, mere courage and military talent 
 are not always sufficient to make a great military 
 commander. Thus Peterborough is, in comparison 
 with Marlborough, hardly known as a general ; yet 
 Peterborough, by his skilful and splendid audacity.
 
 16 CHARACTER. 
 
 gained victories which Marlborough might have been 
 proud to claim. The diihculty with Peterborough was 
 that he could not endure being bored; while Marl- 
 borough's endurance of bores was quite as marvellous 
 as the military genius by which he won every battle he 
 fought and took every place he besieged. If Peter- 
 borough was prevented by the caution of his govern- 
 mant or his allies from seizing an occasion for a great 
 exploit, he resigned his command in a pet ; but Marl- 
 borough patiently submitted to be robbed by the 
 timidity of his allies of opportunities for victories 
 greater even than those he achieved, and persisted, in 
 spite of irritations which would have crazed a more 
 sensitive spirit, until the object of the heterogeneous 
 coalition which his genius welded together had been 
 attained. 
 
 Again, in the conduct of social and moral reforms, 
 persistency is the test by which we discriminate men 
 of moral opinions from men in whom moral opinions 
 have been deepened into moral ideas and consolidated 
 hi moral character. To be sure, a man may, without 
 character, seem to persist in the work of reform, 
 provided society will fly into a passion with him, and 
 thus furnish continual stimulants to his pride and pug- 
 nacity ; but true persistency becomes indispensabl* 
 irhen his ungracious task is to overcome that smiling;
 
 CHARACTER. IT 
 
 indifference, that self-pleased ignorance, that half-pity- 
 ing, irritating contempt with which a fat and con- 
 tented community commonly receives the arguments 
 and the invectives of innovation. It is the more 
 important to insist on sinewy vigor and constancy in 
 the champions of reform, because, in our day, the 
 business attracts to it so many amateurs who mistake 
 vague intellectual assent to possible improvements for 
 the disposition and genius which make a reformer ; 
 who substitute bustle for action, sauciness for audacity, 
 the itch of disputation for the martyr-spirit ; and who 
 arrive readily at prodigious results through a bland 
 ignoring of all the gigantic obstacles in the path. 
 Thus it would not be difficult, on any pleasant morn- 
 ing, to meet at any city restaurant some ingenious 
 gentleman getting what he is pleased to call a living 
 after the old Adarnic method of competition, who will, 
 over a cup of cotfee, dispose of concrete America in 
 about ten minutes ; slavery disappears after the first 
 sip ; the Constitution goes in two or three draughts ; 
 the Bible vanishes in a pause of deglutitional satis- 
 faction ; and a new order of society springs up while, 
 in obedience to the old, he draws forth a reluctant 
 shilling to pay for the beverage. Now, there is no 
 disgrace •n lacking insight into practical life, and power 
 Vo change it for the better ; but certainly these amia-
 
 
 18 CHARACTER. 
 
 ble deficiencies are as gracefully exhibited in assent- 
 ing to what is established a in playing at reform, 
 attitudinizing martyrdom, and engaging in a schemo 
 to overturn the whole world as a mere relaxation 
 from the severer duties o life. 
 
 In passing from practical life to literature, we shali 
 find that persistency is the quality separating first-rate 
 genius from all the other rates, — proving, as it does, 
 that the author mentally and morally lives in the re- CC> 
 gion of thought and emotion about which he writes ; — ' 
 accepts the drudgery of composition as a path to the , 
 
 object he desires to master ; and is too much en- 
 raptured with the beautiful vision before his eyes to <-< J 
 weary of labor in its realization. In the creations of ce: 
 such men there is neither languor nor strain, but a o 
 " familiar grasp of things Divine." They are easily 
 to be distinguished from less bountifully endowed na- 
 tures and less raised imaginations. Thus Tennyson, 
 as a man, is evidently not on a level with his works. ^5- 
 Ele is rather a writer of poems than, like Wordsworth, 
 essentially a poet; and, accordingly, he only occasion- 
 ally rises into that region where Wordsworth per- 
 manently dwells ; the moment he ceases his intense 
 scrutiny of his arrested mood, and aims to be easy 
 and familiar, he but unbends into laborious flatness 
 *ut we think a trained eye can detect, even in th« 
 
 r-4 
 
 CO 
 
 U-l
 
 CHARACTER. 19 
 
 •eeming commonplaces of Wordsworth, a ray of that 
 light, " that never was on sea or land." Still, Ten- 
 nyson, in his exalted moods, has a clear vision of a 
 poetical conception, persists in his advances to it, 
 discards all vagrant thoughts, and subordinates all 
 minor ones, to give it organic expression ; and, when 
 he descends from his elevation, always brings a poem 
 with him, and not a mere collection of poetical lines 
 and images. Such a man, though his poetical char- 
 acter is — relatively to the greatest poets — imperfect, 
 is still, of course, to be placed far above a mere men- 
 tal roue, like the author of " Festus," who debauches 
 in thoughts and sentiments ; pours forth memories 
 and fancies with equal arrogance of originality ; and 
 having no definite aim, except to be very fine and 
 very saucy, produces little more than a collection of 
 poetic materials, not fused, but confused. From such 
 an anarchy of the faculties no great poem was ever 
 born, for great poems are the creations of great in- 
 dividualities, — of that causative and presiding " Me " 
 which contemptuously rejects the perilous imperti- 
 nences it spontaneously engenders, and drives the 
 nature of which it is the centre persistingly on to 
 the object that gleams in the distance. Make a man 
 uf Milton's force and affluence of imagination half-in- 
 toxicated and half-crazy, and any enterprising booksel
 
 20 CHARACTER. 
 
 ler might draw from the lees of his mind a " Festus* 
 once a week and each monstrosity would doubtless be 
 hailed by some readers, who think they have a taste 
 for poetry, as a greater miracle of genius than " Par- 
 adise Lost." 
 
 Indeed, in all the departments of creative thought, 
 fertility is a temptation to be resisted before inven- 
 tions and discoveries are possible. The artist who 
 dallies with his separate conceptions as they throng 
 into his mind, produces no statue or picture, for that 
 depends on austerely dismissing the most enticing im- 
 ages, provided they do not serve his particular purpose 
 at the time. The same truth holds in the inventive 
 arts and in science. 
 
 It is needless to say that the most common and 
 most attractive manifestations of persistency of char- 
 acter proceed from those natures in which the affec- 
 tions are dominant. An amazing example, replete 
 with that pathos which "lies too deep for tears," is 
 found in the story, chronicled by John of Brompton, 
 of the mother of Thomas-a-Beeket. 1 1 is father, Gil- 
 bert-a-Becket, was taken prisoner during one of the 
 Crusades by a Syrian Emir, and held for a consid- 
 erable period in a kind of honorable captivity A 
 (laughter of the Emir saw him at her father's table, 
 beard \iim converse, fel in love with him. and offered
 
 CHARACTEB. 21 
 
 to arrange the means by which both might escape 
 to Europe. The project only partly succeeded ; he 
 escaped, but she was left behind. Soon afterward, 
 however, she contrived to elude her attendants, and, 
 after many marvellous adventures by sea and land, 
 arrived in England, knowing but two English words, 
 " London " and " Gilbert." By constantly repeating 
 the first, she was directed to the city ; and there, 
 followed by a mob, she walked for months from street 
 to street, crying, as she went, " Gilbert ! Gilbert ! " 
 She at last came to the street in which her lover 
 lived. The mob and the name attracted the attention 
 of a servant in the house ; Gilbert recognized her 
 and they were married. We doubt if any poet, if 
 even Chaucer, ever imaginatively conceived sentiment 
 in a form so vital and primary as it is realized in 
 this fact. 
 
 Character, whether it be small or great, evil or 
 good, thus always represents a positive and persisting 
 force, and can, therefore, like other forces, be calcu- 
 lated, and the issues of its action predicted. There \9 
 nothing really capricious in character to a man gifted 
 with the true piercing insight into it; and Pope was 
 right in bringing the charge of insanity against Curll, 
 the bookseller, provided Curll did once speak politely 
 it a customer, and did once refuse two-and-sixpenee
 
 22 CHARACTER. 
 
 for Sir Richard Blackmore's Essays. There is nothing 
 tuore mortifying to a reader of mankind than to be 
 convicted of error in spelling out a character. We 
 can all sympathize with the story of that person who 
 was once requested, by a comparative stranger, to lend 
 him ten dollars, to be returned the next day at ten 
 o'clock. The request was complied with ; but the 
 lender felt perfectly certain that the borrower be- 
 longed to that large and constantly-increasing class 
 of our fellow-citizens who are commonly included in 
 the genus "sponge," and he therefore bade his money, 
 as it left his purse, that affectionate farewell which is 
 only breathed in the moment of permanent separa- 
 tions. Much to his chagrin, however, the money was 
 returned within a minute of the appointed time. A 
 few days after, the same person requested a loan of 
 thirty dollars, promising, as before, to return the sura 
 tit a specified hour. "No!" was the response of in- 
 sulted and indignant sagacity ; " you disappointed m« 
 once, sir, and I shall not give you an opportunity 
 of doing H again." 
 
 A commanding mind in any station is indicated 
 by the accuracy with which it calculates the power 
 Mid working intelligence of the subaltern natures it 
 uses. In business, in war, in government, in all 
 matters where many agents are employed to prodno*
 
 CHARACTER. 28 
 
 a single result, one miscalculation of character by the 
 person who directs the complex operation is sufficient 
 to throw the whole scheme into confusion. Napo- 
 leon's rage at General Dupont for capitulating at 
 Baylen was caused not more by the disasters which 
 flowed from it than by the irritation he felt in hav- 
 ing confided to Dupont a task he proved incompetent 
 to perform. Napoleon did not often thus miscalculate 
 the capacity of his instruments. In the most des- 
 perate exigency of the battle of "YVagram he had a 
 cheerful faith that he should in the end be victorious, 
 relying, as he did, on two things, — probabilities to 
 others, but certainties to him, — namely, that the col- 
 umn led by Macdonald would pierce the Austrian 
 centre, and that the difficult operation committed to 
 Davoust would be carried out, whatever failure might 
 have been possible had it been intrusted to any other 
 marshal. So, after the defeat at Essling, the success 
 of Napoleon's attempt to withdraw his beaten army 
 depended on the character of Massena, to whom the 
 Emperor despatched a messenger, telling him to keep 
 his position for two hours longer at Aspern. This 
 order, couched in the form of a request, almost re- 
 quired an impossilrlity ; but Napoleon knew the in 
 domitable tenacity of the man to whom he gave it 
 The messenger found Massena seated on a heap of
 
 24 CHARACTER. 
 
 rubbish, nis eyes bloodshot, his frame weakened by his 
 unparalleled exertions during a contest of forty hours, 
 and his whole appearance indicating a physical state 
 better fitting the hospital than the field. But that 
 steadfast soul seemed altogether unaffected by bodily 
 prostration. Half dead as he was with physical fatigue, 
 he rose painfully, and said : " Tell the Emperor that 
 I will hold out for two hours — six — twenty-four — 
 as long as it is necessary for the safety of the army." 
 And, it is needless to add, he kept his word. 
 
 In politics, where so many foul purposes are veiled 
 in fair pretences, the calculation of character is of pri- 
 mal importance ; but the process requires insight and 
 foresight beyond what people commonly exercise in 
 practical affairs, and the result is that misconception of 
 men and events which has so often involved individuals 
 and governments in frightful calamities. A true judg- 
 ment of persons penetrates through the surface to the 
 centre and substance of their natures, and can even 
 detect in pretences, which may deceive the pretenders 
 themselves, that subtle guile which corrupt character 
 always infuses into the most celestial professions of 
 morality or humanity. In every French revolution, 
 for example, it rains beneficent words ; but, if we really 
 desire to know how the bland and amiable humanities 
 cf the movement are to terminate, we must give slight
 
 CHARACTER. 25 
 
 attention to what the social and political leaders say 
 and think, except sc far a? in their sayings and 
 thoughts there are occasionally those unconscious es- 
 capes of character which shed unwilling light on what 
 they really are and what they really mean. We must 
 not hesitate to deny undoubted truths if they are pom- 
 pously announced for the purpose of serving the ends 
 of falsehood. There is an acrid gentleman of my ac- 
 quaintance, who, whenever he sees a quack advertise- 
 ment commencing with the startling interrogation, 
 " Is health desirable ? " instantly answers, " No ! " be- 
 cause, if the premise be once admitted, the pills follow 
 in logical sequence ; and, to save health in the concrete, 
 he is willing to deny it in the abstract. So it is well to 
 reject even liberty, equality, and fraternity, when, from 
 the nature of their champions, or from the nature of 
 the society to which they are applied, equality means 
 the dominion of a clique, frateimity introduces massa- 
 cre, and liberty ushers in Louis Napoleon and the 
 Empire. It was by looking through the rodomontade 
 of such virtue prattlers, and looking at men and things 
 in their essential principles, that. Burke was enabled to 
 predict the issue of the French Revolution of 1789, and 
 to give French news in advance, not merely of the 
 mail, but of the actual occurrence of events. He read 
 events in their principles and causes. 
 a
 
 26 CHARACTER. 
 
 This calculation of character, this power ot discern 
 ing the tendencies and results of actions in the naturft 
 of their actors, is not confined to practical life, but is 
 applicable also to literature, — another great field in 
 which character is revealed, and to which some allusion 
 has already been made in treating of persistency. As 
 all the vital movements of the mind are acts, character 
 may be as completely expressed in the production of a 
 book as in the conduct of a battle or the establishment 
 of an institution. This is not merely the case in 
 authors like Montaigne, Charles Lamb, and Sydney 
 Smith, whose quaint exposure of individual peculiar- 
 ities constitutes no small portion of their charm ; or in 
 authors like Rousseau and Byron, who exultingly 
 exact attention to their fooleries and obliquities by 
 furiously dragging their readers into the privacies of 
 their moral being ; or in authors like Lamartine, who 
 teem to dwell in an innocent ignorance or dainty denial 
 of all external objects which offend their personal 
 tastes, and who dissolve their natures into a senti- 
 mental mist, which is diffused over every province of 
 nature and human life which they appear to describe 
 or portray. But the same principle, in these so glar- 
 ingly apparent, holds with regard to writers whose 
 natures are not obtruded upon the attention, but which 
 WA\te in the general tone and animating spirit of their
 
 CHARACTER. 27 
 
 productions. Guizot and Mil- nan have both subjected 
 the original authorities, consulted by Gibbon in his his- 
 tory of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, to 
 the intensest scrutiny, to see if the historian has per- 
 verted, falsified, or suppressed facts. Their judgment 
 is in favor of his honesty and his conscientious re- 
 learch. Yet this by no means proves that we can 
 obtain through his history the real truth of persons and 
 events. The whole immense tract of history he trav- 
 erses he has thoroughly Gibbonized. The qualities of 
 bis character steal out in every paragraph ; the words 
 we instinct with Gibbon's nature ; though the facts 
 xiay be obtained from without, the relations in which 
 they are disposed are communicated from within ; and 
 the human race for fifteen centuries is made tributary 
 to Gibbon's thought, wears the colors and badges of 
 Gibbon's nature, is denied the possession of any pure 
 and exalted experiences which Gibbon cannot verify by 
 his own ; and the reader, who is magnetized by the 
 historian's genius, rises from the perusal of the vast 
 ^ork, informed of nothing as it was in itself, but every- 
 thing as it appeared to Gibbon, and especially doubting 
 two things, — that there is any chastity in women, or 
 any divine truth in Christianity. Yet we suppose that 
 Gibbon would net, by critics, be ranked in the subjec- 
 tive class of writers, but in the objective class. Still,
 
 28 CHARACTER. 
 
 the sensuality and scepticism which are in him are in- 
 fused into the minds of his docile readers with more 
 refined force than Rousseau and Byron ever succeeded 
 in infusing theirs. 
 
 Every author, indeed, who really influences the mind, 
 who plants in it thoughts and sentiments which take 
 root and grow, communicates his character. Error and 
 immorality, — two words for one thing, for error is the 
 immorality of the intellect, and immorality the error of 
 the heart, — these escape from him if they are in him, 
 and pass into the recipient mind through suhtle avenues 
 invisible to consciousness. We accordingly sometimes 
 find open natures, gifted with more receptivity than 
 power of resistance or self-assertion, spotted all over 
 with the sins of the intellects they have hospitably 
 entertained, exhibiting evidence of having stormed 
 heaven with iEschylus, and anatomized damnation 
 with Dante, and revelled in indecencies with Rabelais, 
 and got drunk with Burns, and violated all the austerer 
 moralities with Moore. 
 
 Influence being thus the communication from one 
 mind to another of positive individual life, great na- 
 tures are apt to overcome smaller natures, instead of 
 developing them, — a conquest and usurpation as com- 
 mon in literature as in practical affairs. This spiritual 
 lespotism, wielded by the Caesars and Napoleons of
 
 CHARACTER. 29 
 
 . hough t, ever implies personal and concentrated might 
 in the despot ; and the process of its operation is very 
 different from those mental processes in which some 
 particular faculty or sentiment acts, as it were, on its 
 own account, — processes which lack all living force 
 and influence, creating nothing, communicating nothing, 
 equally good for nothing and bad for nothing. Thus, 
 by wading through what Robert Hall calls the " con- 
 tinent of mud " of a mechanical religious writer, it ia 
 impossible to obtain any religious life ; and diabolical 
 vitality will perhaps be as vainly sought in the volumes 
 of such a mechanical reprobate as Wycherley. But 
 the moment you place yourself in relation with living 
 minds, you find Shakespeare pouring Norman blood in- 
 to your veins and the feudal system into your thoughts, 
 nnd Milton putting iron into your will, and Spinoza 
 entangling your poor wit in inextricable meshes of 
 argumentation, and Goethe suffusing your whole nature 
 with a sensuous delight, which converts heroism itself 
 into a phase of the comfortable, and disinterestedness 
 into one of the fine arts. The natures of such men, 
 being deeper, healthier, and more broadly inclusive 
 than the natures of intense and morbid authors, are 
 necessarily stronger, more searching, and admit of less 
 resistance. In order that they may be genially assimi- 
 lated, we must keep them at such a distance as to save
 
 80 CHARACTER. 
 
 our own personality from being insensibly merged into 
 theirs. They are dangerous guests if they eat you, but 
 celestial visitants if you can contrive to eat even a por- 
 tion of them. It is curious to see what queer pranks 
 they sometimes play with aspiring mediocrities, unqual- 
 iied to receive more than the forms of anything, who 
 ^trut about in their liveries, ostentatious of such badges 
 of intellectual servitude, and emulous to act in the 
 farce of high life as it is below stairs. Thus, when 
 Goethe first invaded the United States, it was noised 
 about that he was a many-sided man, free from every 
 sort of misdirecting enthusiasm, and conceiving and pre- 
 Benting all tilings in their right relations. Instantly a 
 swarm of Goethes sprang up all around us, wantoning 
 in nonchalance and the fopperies of comprehensiveness. 
 The thing was found to be easier even than Byronism, 
 requiring no scowls, no cursing and swearing, no in- 
 creased expenditure for cravats and gin ; and, accord- 
 ingly, one could hardly venture into society without 
 meeting some youthful blase, whose commonplace was 
 trumpeted as comprehension, whose intellectual laziness 
 was dignified with the appellation of repose, and whose 
 many-sidedness was the feeble expression of a person- 
 ality without sufficient force to rise even into one-sided- 
 
 0699. 
 
 So far we have considered character principally aa
 
 CHARACTER. 81 
 
 it works in practical affairs and in literature ; but 
 perhaps its grandest and mightiest exemplifications are 
 in tho.-e rare men who have passed up, through a 
 process of lite and growth, from the actual world 
 into the region of universal sentiments and great spir- 
 itual ideas. Every step in the progress of such men 
 is through material and spiritual facts, each of which 
 is looked into, looked through, and converted into 
 force for further advance. The final elevation they 
 attain, being the consequence of natural growth, has 
 none of the* instability of heights reached by occa- 
 sional raptures of aspiration, but is as solid and as firm 
 as it is high ; and their characters, expressed in deeds 
 all alive with moral energy, are fountains whence the 
 world is continually replenished with a new and nobler 
 life. A great and comprehensive person of this ex- 
 alted order, to whom the imaginations of the poet 
 Beem but the commonplaces of the heaven in which 
 he dwells, is not to be confounded with his counter 
 feits, that is, with certain agile natures that leap, 
 with one bound of thought, from the every-day world 
 t.o an abstract and mocking ideal ; and, perched on 
 their transitory elevation, fleer and gibe at the social 
 system to which they really belong, and of which, 
 with all its sins and follies, thay are far from being 
 tfie best or the wisest members. The impression left
 
 82 CHARACTER. 
 
 by the reality is radiant spiritual power ; the impress 
 sion left by the counterfeit is simply pertness. 
 
 But let a great character, with the celestial city 
 actually organized within him, descend upon a com- 
 munity to revolutionize and reform, and, in the con- 
 flict which ensues, he is sure to be victorious, for he 
 is strong with a diviner strength than earth knows, 
 and wields weapons whose stroke no mortal armor 
 can withstand. If he come at all, he comes in a bodily 
 form, and he comes to disturb ; and society, with a 
 bright apprehension of these two facts, has heretofore 
 thought it a shrewd contrivance to remove him to 
 another world before he had utterly disordered this. 
 But in this particular case its axes, and gibbets, 
 and fires could not apply ; for the tremendous per- 
 sonality it sought to put out of the way had been 
 built up by an assimilation of the life of things ; and 
 all mortal engines were therefore powerless to destroy 
 one glowing atom of his solid and immortally persist- 
 ing nature. Accordingly, after his martyrdom, he is 
 the same strange, intrusive, pertinacious, resistless force 
 that he was before ; active as ever in every part of 
 the social frame ; pervading the community by degrees 
 with his peculiar life; glaring in upon his murderers 
 in their most secret nooks of retirement ; rising, lik« 
 ihe ghost of Banquo, to spread horror and amaze
 
 CHARACTER. 88 
 
 Bent over their feasts ; searing their eyeballs with 
 itrange "sights," even in the public markets; nor 
 does he put off the torment of his presence until the 
 cowards who slew him have gone, like Henry the 
 Second, to the tomb of Becket, and, in the agonies 
 of fear and remorse, have canonized him as a saint. 
 In these scattered remarks on a subject broad as 
 human life, and various as the actual and possible 
 combinations of the elements of human nature, I have 
 attempted to indicate the great vital fact in human 
 affairs, that all influential power, in all the depart- 
 ments of practical intellectual and moral energy, is 
 the expression of character, of forcible, persisting, and 
 calculable persons, who have grown up into a stat- 
 ure more or less colossal through an assimilation of 
 material or spiritual realities. This fact makes pro- 
 duction the test and measure of power, imprints on 
 production the mental and moral imperfections of 
 that power, and, with a kind of sullen sublimity, 
 declares that as a man is so shall be his work. It 
 thus remorselessly tears off all the gaudy ornaments 
 of opinion and phrase with which conceit bedizens 
 weakness, and exhibits each person in his essential 
 personality. The contemplation of this fact, like the 
 contemplation of all facts, may sadden the sentimental 
 and the luxurious, as it reveals Alps to climb, not 
 
 2« O
 
 34 CHARACTER. 
 
 bowers of bliss to bask in ; but to manly natures, who 
 disdain the trappings of pretension, the prospect i9 
 healthy, and the sharp sleet air invigorating. By 
 showing that men and things are not so good or so 
 great as they seem, it may destroy the hope born of 
 our dreams ; but it is the source of another and more 
 bracing hope, born of activity and intelligence. By 
 the acidity with which it mocks the lazy aspirations, 
 blown up as bubbles from the surface of natures which 
 are really crumbling into dust amidst their pretty 
 playthings, this fact may seem a sneering devil ; 
 but if it start into being one genuine thrill of vital 
 thought, or touch that inmost nerve of activity whence 
 character derives its force, it will be found to cheer 
 *nd to point upward like other angels of the Lord.
 
 u. 
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 ONE of the most prominent characteristics which 
 strike an observer of human life is the sulky, 
 sleepy common sense which shapes, guides, and lim- 
 its its ordinary affairs ; a common sense fruitful of 
 definite opinions, creative of stable works, solid, per- 
 severing, consistent, intolerant of innovation, contemp- 
 tuous of abstract truth and ideal right, and most 
 Buolimely oontent with itself. This common intelli- 
 gence, the democracy of reason, the wits love to 
 stigmatize as stupidity, because it rigorously resists 
 all substitution of smart sayings for commodious in- 
 stitutions, and is insensible to the value of all thoughts 
 which will not hitch on to things. It believes in 
 bread, beef, houses, laws, trade, talent, the prices- 
 current, the regular course of events, and, perhaps, 
 in the spirituality of table-knockings ; it disbelieves in 
 total abstinence, woman's rights, transcendentalism, 
 perfectibility, and to the humane interrogation " Am 
 \ not a man and a brother ? " it stoutly answers, " No,
 
 36 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 you are not ! " The great merit of this common sense 
 consists in its representing the average intellect and 
 conscience of the civilized world, — of that portion of 
 intelligence, morality, and Caristianity which has been 
 practically embodied in life and active power. It de- 
 stroys pretence and quackery, and tests genius and 
 heroism. It changes with the progress of society , 
 persecutes in one age what it adopts in the next ; 
 its martyrs of the sixteenth century are its prece- 
 dents and exponents of the nineteenth ; and a good 
 part of the common sense of an elder day is the 
 common nonsense of our own. It would decay and 
 die out were it not continually nourished by the new 
 and freshening life poured into it by the creative 
 thinkers whom it denounces as unpractical visionaries 
 It always yields in the end to every person who rep 
 resents a higher intellectual, moral, or spiritual ener 
 gy than its own, and the grandest achievement of 
 individual power is the conception of a new thought 
 of such indestructible and victorious vitality, that il 
 breaks through all the obstacles which obstruct the 
 passage of heresies into truisms, and converts private 
 opinion into common sense. 
 
 It would seem to be a good law of life that met 
 Bhould be thus associated in mental recognition of 
 aommon principles of intelligence, level to theii ordi
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTEB. 37 
 
 nary actions, and thus present a solid bulwaik of 
 Bound character, on which pretension should try its 
 tricks, »^d nonsense spend its fury, in vain, hut 
 which genuine intellectual or moral energy might 
 overturn or overleap. The great office of common 
 sense is to set up the general wisdom and the gen- 
 eral will against the caprices of individual opinion 
 and the excesses of self-will. Its maxims and prov 
 erbs constitute a kind of intellectual currency, issued, 
 apparently, on the authority of human nature, and 
 based on the experience of sixty centuries. The de- 
 viations from its established order, whether the devi- 
 ations of whim or the deviations of genius, it calls 
 Eccentricity. The essential characteristic of this or- 
 der consists in its disposing tilings according to their 
 mutual relations, — the natural relations they would 
 assume in practical life, provided they received no 
 twists from individual vanity, or conceit, or passion. 
 Eccentricity is the disturbance of the relations enjoined 
 by common sense, and a habit of looking at things, 
 not in their relations to each other, hut in their re- 
 lations to the dominant wilfulness of the individual. 
 Its most ordinary form is the rebellion of mediocrity 
 tgainst the laws of its own order. When this pro- 
 ceeds on any grounds of original disposition, it soon 
 exalts caprice into a principle and organizes crotchets
 
 38 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 into character. Men of this stamp, in whose huddled 
 minds disorder is welded together by a kind of crazy 
 force of individuality, commonly pass for more than 
 they are worth. Their self-will, the parent of bound- 
 less impudence and furious self-assertion, gives au- 
 dacity to intellectual littleness, raciness to intellectual 
 anarchy, and a certain flash and sparkle to meanness 
 and malice. The little brain they have, thus galvan- 
 ized by constant contact with the personal pronoun, 
 presents a grand exhibition of mediocrity in convul- 
 sions, of spite in spasms, of impulses in insurrection 
 animating thoughts in heaps. Commonplaces are 
 made to look like novelties by being shot forth in 
 hysteric bursts. Startling paradoxes are created out 
 of inverted truisms. The delirium of impatient sensa- 
 tions is put forward as the rapture of heaven-scaling 
 maginations. Yet through all the jar, and discord, 
 and fussy miscreativeness of such chaotic minds there 
 runs an unmistakable individuality, by which you can 
 discriminate one crazy head from another, and refer 
 the excesses of each to their roots in character. 
 
 It is only, however, when eccentricity connects 
 itself with genius that we have its raciest and most 
 riotous disregard of the restraints of custom and the 
 maxims of experience. Sane and healthy genius, it 
 s true, is often *t war with recognized principles
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 39 
 
 without being eccentric. If it violates the conven- 
 tional order, and disturbs the practical relations of 
 things, it is because it discerns a higher order, and 
 discovers relations more essential. Eccentricity views 
 things in relation to its own crotchet; genius, in re- 
 lation to a new idea. There is a world-wide differ- 
 ence between the eccentric fanaticism of John of 
 Munster and the religious genius of Martin Luther, 
 though both assailed the established order. But 
 genius itself sometimes falls under the dominion of 
 wilfulness and whim, and it then creates magnificent 
 crotchets of its own. Let us now survey this two- 
 fold eccentricity of ordinary and extraordinary minds, 
 as it appears in social life, in the arena of politics 
 and government, in religion, and, in its more refined 
 expression, in literature and art. 
 
 In regard to the eccentricities of character devel- 
 oped in social life, the most prominent relate to the 
 freaks of impulse and passion. In most old commu 
 nities there is a common sense even in sensuality 
 Vice itself gets gradually digested into a system, is 
 amenable to certain laws of conventional propriety 
 and honor, has for its object simply the gratification 
 of its appeti'es, and frowns with quite a conservative 
 air on all new invention?, all untried experiments, 
 in iniquity. There is often, for instance, in gluttony
 
 40 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 a solid and stolid respectability, a calm and grand 
 devotion of the whole man to the gastronomic ec- 
 stasy, which evinces that appetite has been organized 
 into faith and life. Thus Doctor Johnson, at a Lord 
 Mayor's dinner, committed the scandalous impropriety 
 cf talking wit and wisdom to an alderman by his 
 side, who desired to concentrate his whole energies 
 on the turtle. " Sir," said the alderman, in a tone 
 and with a look of awful rebuke, " in attempting 
 to listen to your long sentences, and give you a 
 short answer, I have swallowed two pieces of green 
 fat, without ta>ting the flavor. I beg you to let me 
 enjoy my present happiness in peace." Examples 
 might be multiplied of the gravity and sobriety which 
 vices assume when they are institutions as well as 
 appetites. 
 
 But the spoiled children of wealth, rank, and fash 
 ion soon profess themselves bored with this time- 
 honored, instituted, and decorous dissoluteness, and 
 demand something more stimulating and piquant, 
 something which will tickle vanity and plume will. 
 A certain crazy vehemence of irdividual life, in 
 which impatience of restraint is combined with a 
 desire to startle, leads them to attempt to scale the 
 eminences of immorality by originalities in lawless- 
 ness and discoveries in diabolism. Despising the timia
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 4l 
 
 science of the old fogies of sensuality, these bright 
 young fellows let loose all the reins of restraint, flame 
 out in all the volatilities of sin and vagaries of vice, 
 ind aim to realize a festivity dashed with insanity 
 md spiced with satanic pride. They desire not 
 merely wine, but the " devil's wine " ; something which 
 will give a zest, a sharp, tingling, fearful, wicked 
 relish to excess. They have a kind of "hunger and 
 thirst after unrighteousness " ; and, poets in dissipa- 
 tion, pursue a constantly receding ideal of frantic 
 delight. Their deity of pleasure is the bewitching 
 daughter of sin and death, who streams mockingly 
 before their inward vision with flushed cheeks, crazy, 
 sparkling eyes, and mad, dishevelled tresses. Such 
 were Buckingham, Rochester, Wharton, Queensberry, 
 — noble roues, high in the peerage of debauch, 
 whose brilliant rascality illustrates the annals of ec- 
 centric libertinism ; who devoted their lives, fortunes, 
 and sacred honor to the rights of reprobates, and 
 raised infamy itself to a kind of fame ; — men who 
 had a sublime ambition to become heroes in sensual- 
 ity, and seem to have taken for their model that 
 Dionysius of Sicily whom Plutarch commemorates as 
 iaving prolonged a drunken feast through ninety days. 
 Rochester, when he fell into the hands of Bishop 
 Burnet, coirld hardly r^ollect the time when be had
 
 #2 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 been sober, and might, with the amiable simplicity 
 recorded of another inebriate, have staggered into an 
 intelligence office, to know where he had been for the 
 last ten years. "Wharton, bragging to Swift of his 
 drunken frolics, was advised by that cynical satirist to 
 rary his caprices a little, and take a frolic to be vir- 
 tuous. Indeed, in these men the " wet damnation " 
 cf drunkenness seems to have filtered through their 
 senses into their souls, so as to make reason reel and 
 conscience stagger, and the whole man to decline 
 from an immoral into an unmoral being. Yet this 
 suicide of soul and body is, by such disciples and 
 martyrs of pleasure, ludicrously misnamed " life." 
 Its philosophy is concentrated in a remark made by 
 George Selwyn, as he surveyed himself in the glass, 
 the day after a heroic debauch: "I look and feel 
 villanously bad," he said; "but, hang it, it is life, — 
 it is life!" 
 
 Those devotees and fanatics of pleasure represent 
 that form of eccentricity in which the head seems too 
 small for the passions of the individual to move about 
 in, and they accordingly appear to craze and rend 
 the brain in the desperate effort to escape from their 
 orison. But there are other eccentrics in whom we 
 ebserve the opposite process, persons whose thoughts 
 and feelings are all turned inward, and group at
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 43 
 
 iddle round some conceit of their wilfulness, some 
 nobby of their intellect, or some master disposition 
 of their selfishness. These are the men who gradu- 
 ally become insane on some one darling peculiarity 
 of character, which is exaggerated into huge size by 
 assiduous training. It is, as Sir Thomas Browne 
 would say, " an acorn in their young brows which 
 grows to an oak in their old heads." Conceit, for 
 instance, often ends in making a man mentally and 
 morally deaf and blind. He hears nothing but the 
 whispers of vanity, he sees nothing but what is re- 
 flected in the mirror of self-esteem, though society all 
 the while may be on the broad grin or in a civil 
 titter at his pompous nothingness. He will doubt 
 everything before he doubts his own importance ; 
 and his folly, being based on a solid foundation of 
 6elf-delusion, steals out of him in the most uncon- 
 scious and innocent way in the world. Thus the 
 proud Duke of Somerset, whose conceit was in his 
 rank and his long line of forefathers, once declared 
 that he sincerely pitied Adam because he had no an 
 cestors. The Earl of Buchan, a poor aristocrat, was 
 accustomed to brood in his Edinburgh garret over 
 the deeds and splendors of his ancestors, until he 
 dentified himself with them, and would startle his 
 fccquaintances with the remark, " When I wa* in
 
 il ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 Palestine with Richard of the Lion Heart," or, " As 
 I was going to see the execution of Charles the 
 First," 6uch and such things occurred. His greater 
 brother, Erskine, the glory of Westminster Hall, was 
 an egotist of genius, and was such a spendthrift of 
 the personal pronoun, that Cobbett, who was once 
 printing one of his speeches, stopped in the middle, 
 giving as his reason, that at this point the " I's " in 
 his fount of type gave out, and he could not proceed. 
 This egotism, which in Erskine was mingled with 
 genius and good-nature, often frets itself into a mor- 
 bid unreasonableness which is satire-proof. Thus we 
 heard but the other day of an eccentric German 
 who prosecuted an author who had anticipated him in 
 the publication of an invention, on the ground that 
 the idea had been abstracted from his own head 
 through a process of animal magnetism. But the 
 most sovereign and malignant of these eccentric ego- 
 tists was undoubtedly Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, 
 who, while she lived, was the most terrible creature 
 in Great Britain. She bullied Queen Anne, and she 
 henpecked the Great Duke himself, who, serene as 
 » summer morning in a tempest of bullets, cowered 
 Lt his own palace before her imperious will. She 
 defied everything, death included. Indeed, death, like 
 everybody else, seemed to be afraid of her. In hei
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 45 
 
 »la age she became as ugly and as spiteful a crone as 
 iver wa. «*acked or burned for witchcraft. She took 
 a malicious dch b ht \a living, because, though life gave 
 her no pleasure, It gave others pain. At one time 
 it was thought she muct go. She lay for a great 
 while speechless and senoeU>3t. The physician said, 
 * She must be blistered or «he will die." This 
 touched her, and she screamed «>.yt, " / won't be blis- 
 tered, and I won't die ! " and she kept her word. 
 
 But the mirth of society changes to wailing when 
 this conceit develops itself into a hobby, and takes 
 :nen by the button to pester them with the rationale 
 £ its bit of absurdity. The hobby-monger is the 
 jnly perfect and consummated bore, and eccentricity 
 n him becomes a very dismal joke. Self-convinced 
 )f the value of his original, deeply cogitated piece of 
 nonsense, he is determined to devote his life, and 
 your money, to the task of converting his great 
 thought into a great fact, and to make incapacity 
 itself a source of income. The thing is a new mode 
 of levying black-mail, for the cheapest way to escape 
 from the teasing persecution of his tongue is to de 
 liver up your purse. His success generates a whole 
 brood of blockheads, who install hobhyism into an 
 institution, and flood the country with hobby patriot- 
 «m, hobby science, hobby medicine, hobby philao
 
 1Q ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 thropy, hobby theology, hobby morality, and hobby 
 Immorality. Dunces who never had but one thought 
 in their lives, — and that a foolish one, — they cling to 
 that with the tenacity of instinct, and set up, on the 
 strength of it, as Galileos, or Arkwrights, or Clark- 
 sons, or Luthers, transmuting sneers, gibes, invectives, 
 blows, into a sweet, celestial ichor, to slake the thirst 
 of their conceit. They are, to be sure, very candid 
 gentlemen. Their cry is, " P^xamine before you con- 
 demn." Ah ! examine ; but, since the lamented de- 
 cease of Methuselah, human life has been unfortunately 
 contracted, and human knowledge unfortunately en- 
 larged, and it is really the coolest impertinence im- 
 aginable to expect that a man will spend his short 
 existence in inspecting and exploding humbugs, and 
 end at fourscore in establishing a principle which he 
 ought to have taken on trust in his teens. It is 
 better to ride a hobby of one's own than to give 
 one's whole attention to discovering the futility of 
 the hobbies of others ; and better still, as these gen- 
 tlemen are determined that society shall support them, 
 to save time by submitting to assessment. In our 
 country the hobby-mongers seem fairly to be in the 
 ascendant, and the right to mind one's own business 
 must be purchased of these idle dunces portentously 
 developed into voluble bores. Whatever may be thei»
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 47 
 
 plan, and however deep may be their sell-deception, 
 their principle of action is identical with that of 
 Punch's music-grinder, who contemptuously refuses 
 the penny you toss at him, to silence his soul-stab- 
 bing melodies, and clamorously demands a shilling 
 as the price of his " moving on." " Don't you sup 
 pose," he inquires, " that I know the vally of peace 
 and quietness as well as you ? " 
 
 But the conceit of one's self and the conceit of 
 one's hobby are hardly mor6 prolific of eccentricity 
 than the conceit of one's money. Avarice, the most 
 hateful and wolfish of all the hard, cool, callous dis- 
 positions of selfishness, has its own peculiar caprices 
 and crotchets. The ingenuities of its meanness defy 
 all the calculations of reason, and reach the miracu- 
 lous in subtlety. Foote, in endeavoring to express 
 the microscopic niggardliness of a miser of his ac- 
 quaintance, expressed a belief that he would be will 
 ing to take the beam out of his own eye if he knew 
 he could sell the timber. Doubtless one source of 
 *he eccentric miner's insane covetousness and parsi- 
 mony is the tormenting fear of dying a beggar, — 
 hat " fine horror of poverty," according to Lamb, 
 - by which he is not content to keep want from the 
 cjor, or at arm's length, but he places it, by heap 
 Ing wealth upon wealth, at a sublime distance/
 
 48 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 Well, after saving, and pinching, and scraping, and 
 Btealing, and freezing, and starving, Curmudgeon, the 
 Bkeleton, comes face to face with another skeleton 
 Death, and that fleshless form, with an ironic grin 
 huddles him away, — and he is remembered only by 
 those he has cheated. But his perverse sharpness 
 does not desert him even in his last hours. Scrooge 
 is reported to be dying. It is said that in his will 
 he has left something to a charitable society, and the 
 secretary thereof " happens in," to console him. " You 
 think," says Scrooge, with a malicious sparkle in his 
 closing eyes, " that I am going, but the doctor says 
 the attack is not fatal. If you will take that bequest 
 now, at a deduction of ten per cent, I '11 pay it." 
 " Done ! " said the secretary. " Done ! " says Scrooge, 
 and dies, — dies consistent and triumphant, with a 
 discount on his lips instead of a prayer. 
 
 It is, however, in politics and public affairs thtt 
 the strange antics of eccentricity produce the smart- 
 est shocks of surprise. Here everything is done in 
 the eyes of men, and disordered minds parade their 
 caprices to a laughing or cursing world. In this 
 sphere of action and passion it is impossible to group 
 or define. The representation tends to become as 
 wild and whirling as the vagaries, volatilities, and 
 inconsistencies it describes. It requires more than
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 49 
 
 ordinary steadiness of character for a statesman to 
 iscape from the eccentricities produced by ambition, 
 and the eccentricities produced by reaching the object 
 of ambition, — power. The strife of politics tends to 
 ansettle the calmest understanding, and ulcerate the 
 most benevolent heart. There are no bigotries or 
 absurdities too gross for parties to create or adopt 
 under the stimulus of political passions. The path 
 of all great statesmen lies between two opposing in- 
 sanities, and we can never appreciate the superb se- 
 renity of such men as Washington, Hamilton, Jay, 
 Jefferson, Madison, until we realize the atmosphere 
 of madness, rancor, and folly they were compelled 
 to breathe. There, for instance, among other causes 
 or occasions of political eccentricity, is the love of 
 innovation in itself, and the hatred of innovation in 
 itself; both productive of eccentric partisans, in whose 
 struggles common sense is suspended by mutual con- 
 Bent. By the eccentric reformer, institutions are de- 
 nounced as confining Liberty in strait-waistcoats ; by 
 the eccentric conservative, Liberty is denounced as 
 putting firebrands into the hands of madmen. Thus 
 many of our disgusted American conservatives ap- 
 plauded Louis Napoleon's usurpation on the ground 
 'Jhat he would restore old abuses, and saw France, 
 fcith delight, leap back thousands of years to the old 
 a d
 
 50 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 Egyptian monarchy of kings, priests, and soldiers. 
 Gibbon, though the most subtle of religious sceptics, 
 had a morbid hatred of political change, and, on the 
 breaking out of the French Revolution, joined the 
 bishops of the Established Church in assailing it 
 He could not help, however, indulging an ironical 
 fling at the new political friends who were his old 
 theological enemies, and blandly reminded them that 
 if, in his history, he had been a little hard on the 
 primitive church, it was from the best of principles 
 and the best of motives, for that church was an in- 
 novation on the old Pagan Establishment. But the 
 greatest conservative of this sort was Lord- Chancel- 
 lor Thurlow. A deputation of Presbyterians having 
 waited on him to request his aid in obtaining the re- 
 peal of certain statutes disqualifying their body from 
 holding civil offices, Thurlow thus bluffly answered : 
 "Gentlemen, I will be perfectly frank with you. 
 Gentlemen, I am against you, and for the Established 
 
 Church, by ! Not that I like the Established 
 
 Church a bit better than any other church, but be- 
 cause it is established. And whenever you can get 
 
 pour religion established, I '11 be for that too. 
 
 Good morning to you!" 
 
 Tn the eccentricity of politicians the two mosl 
 •triking qualities are levity and malignity, — some-
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 61 
 
 times existing apart, and sometimes coexisting ir oua 
 mind. The most magnificent instance of levity, com- 
 bined with genius and eloquence, is found, perhaps, 
 in Charles Townshend, the chancellor of the exchequer, 
 who revived the scheme of American taxation, and 
 who carried into the councils of Great Britain a 
 brain large enough for the weightiest affairs, but in- 
 toxicated with impudence, conceit, and champagne. 
 The conceptions of a statesman and the courage of a 
 hero were strangely blended in him with a spirit as 
 volatile, sparkling, and unscrupulous as ever animated 
 the rake of the old comedy. It was as if Sir Har- 
 ry Wildair's tricksiness and mercurial temperament 
 had passed into the head of Camden or Chatham. 
 In the majority of cases, however, the ambition or 
 possession of power develops malignity in disordered 
 minds. In John Randolph it took the shape of a 
 fretful spite which poisoned all it touched, even his 
 own fine faculties. This mingled levity and malig- 
 nity, however, are never seen in their full absurdi- 
 ties and terrors, unless power be absolute, and caprice 
 ranges over a kingdom or an empire, unrestrained by 
 jpinion or law. From the old Oriental despots to 
 the thing of blood and mud " that lately sat throned 
 ja Naples, the history of eccentric despots presents 
 loch a spectacle of monkey -like mischievousnesfta com-
 
 52 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 biiied with demon-like malice, that we Ian h&rdl/ 
 recognize human nature in a form so diabolically car- 
 icatured. In Nero, Caligula, Domitian, Commodus, 
 Heliogabalus, Paul of Russia, we observe that pecu 
 liar perversity which does wrong things because they 
 are wrong ; and also that last resource of little minds, 
 the desire to startle by the commission of unnatural 
 crimes, evincing the feebleness and barrenness of tal- 
 ent so apt to be associated with such monstrous 
 brutality of disposition, Nero, for example, finds that 
 the luxury of murder palls on his jaded sense, and 
 the poor creature can hit upon no stimulant likely 
 to keep alive his relish for that form of ferocity 
 ehort of murdering his wife and mother ; and at the 
 end — for under such governments there is a decline 
 so deep in the character of the virtues that treachery 
 becomes justice, and assassination becomes patriotism 
 — he dies as thoroughly blase as a London cox- 
 comb, and as abjectly timid as a girl who has seen 
 a ghost. 
 
 This eccentric malignity is also often developed 
 in men whose minds are unsettled by their being 
 lifted, in the tempests of faction, to a power they 
 we unfitted to exercise. They are Pucks raised to 
 w he seat of Jove. Even Robespierre, — who before 
 Ve became a politician resigned a judicial office be-
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 68 
 
 cause he was opposed to capital punishment, — seemed 
 to have been marked oui by nature for an opinionated 
 philanthropist, sour and wilful withal, but well-mean- 
 ing, honest, self-sacrificing, narrow in mind, and obsti- 
 nate in purpose. When he came to be the head of 
 that prolonged mob, the government of France during 
 the Reign of Terror, the poverty of his talents com- 
 pelled him to meet the crisis of affairs by the exploded 
 maxims of the old tyrants. Like all incompetent 
 men who are cursed with power, he tried to make 
 violence do the work of insight and foresight. He 
 Blew because he could not think. He ended in being 
 fiendish because he started in being foolish. The lit- 
 tle thought he had took the shape of an inexorable 
 but bad logic. He tried to solve a political problem, 
 which might have tasked the genius, energy, and ex- 
 perience of the greatest statesman, with a little syllo- 
 gism, of which the Rights of Man and the chopping off 
 the heads of aristocrats constituted the premises, and 
 of which peace, happiness, equality, and fraternity were 
 to be the logical conclusion. The more he chopped, 
 however, the more complicated became his difficulties. 
 New and more puzzling problems sprang up from the 
 Boil he watered with blood. The time came when mere 
 perversity and presumption could carry it no longer. 
 His adherents informed him at night that he was t«
 
 64 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 bo denounced and slain in the Convention on the 
 morrow, and offered him the means of crushing his 
 enemies. He leaned that barren head of his against 
 a pillar, and for two hours tried to frame some plan 
 by which to carry on the government in case he 
 triumphed. But the poor fellow's invention had been 
 exhausted in the production of his little syllogism, 
 which had miserably failed of success. He could 
 do nothing, he saw, but go on murdering and mur- 
 dering, and he had got somewhat tired of that. The 
 thought that would open a path through the entan- 
 glements of his situation would not come into that 
 unfertile brain. So, in mere despair, he told his ad- 
 herents to let tilings take their course, went to the 
 Convention, uttered his usual declamation, was de- 
 nounced, set upon, and skin ; and thus a capital 
 leader of a debating club, like many a clever man 
 before and since, was ruined by the misfortune of 
 being placed at the head of a nation. 
 
 It is both impossible to avoid, and dangerous to 
 touch, in an essay like this, the subject of religious 
 eccentricity, though the deviations here from the line 
 of admitted truths and duties are innumerable in 
 amount and variety. There is, first, the eccentricity 
 which proceeds from observing the proprieties of piety 
 while practising the precepts of atheism, — the linei
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 55 
 
 decencies of behavior contrasting strangely with the 
 roaree vices of conduct. Thus Madame de Montes- 
 pan, who found it for her interest and vanity to live 
 in habitual violation of the Seventh Commandment, 
 was so rigorous in her devotions that she weighed 
 ler bread in Lent. Cardinal Bernis, the most worth- 
 ess of abbes, owed his advancement in the Church to 
 Ifadame de Pompadour, the most worthless of women, 
 wid then refused " to communicate in the dignity of 
 he purple with a woman of so unsanctimonious a 
 character." Next there is the perverted ingenuity by 
 which creeds are spangled all over with crotchets, 
 «nd the Bible made the basis for conceits as subtle 
 us Cowley's and as ridiculous as Sprat's. Who first 
 doubled the Cape of Good Hope ? Vasco da Gama, 
 you will answer. " No," replies Vieyra, a priest 
 of Portugal ; " one man passed it before he did." 
 "Who?" "Jonah in the whale's belly!" The 
 whale, it seems, from the account of this all-knowing 
 geographer, " went out of the Mediterranean, because 
 he had no other course ; kept the coast of Africa on 
 the left, scoured along Ethiopia, on the shores of 
 Nineveh, and making his tongue serve as a paddle, 
 landed the Prophet there." Next, there is the capri- 
 cious suspension of the damnatory clauses of a creed, 
 »ut "€ respect to eminent individuals, who can give
 
 56 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 benefices if they cannot practise duties. Kings hav<\ 
 immensely profited by this ecclesiastical urbanity 
 having been allowed to pass sweetly from riot and 
 rapine in this world to rest and reward in the next. 
 " Louie the well-beloved," said the priest who an- 
 nounced the death of Louis the Fifteenth, " sleeps in 
 the Lord." " If such a mass of laziness and lust," 
 growls Carlyle, in reply, " sleep in the Lord, who, 
 think you, sleeps elsewhere ? " 
 
 But the most ordinary source of the impious piety 
 and irreverent veneration of eccentric religionists is 
 the substitution of an idolatry of self for the wor- 
 ship of God, the individual projecting his own opin- 
 ions and passions into the texts of Scripture and the 
 government of the universe, and thus making a Su- 
 preme Being out of the colossal exaggerations of 
 eelf-will. Under the impulse of a ravenous egoism, 
 Nature and the Bible are converted into an immense 
 magnifying-glass of his own personality, and the Deity 
 with him is but an infinite reflection of himself. Such 
 is ever the tendency and process of fanaticism, and 
 therefore it is that so many gods are often worshipped 
 in one Church. We often smile at the last excess 
 of pagan despotism, the demand of tyrants that divine 
 aonors shall be paid to them ; but the same claim it 
 •ow often urged by little tyrants, who, having div>
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 67 
 
 D'^ed their stupidity, inhumanity, or malignity, strut 
 about in quite a furious fashion at their divinity 
 being disallowed, flinging the fussy thunderbolts of 
 their impotent wrath with the air of Joves and the 
 strength of pygmies ! What, think you, would these 
 gentlemen do in case they possessed arbitrary power 
 If the imagination breaks down in the attempt to 
 conceive their possible enormities, the history of re- 
 ligious persecution will be of essential aid in filling 
 up the gaps and enlarging the scope of the most 
 fertile and wide-wandering fancy. The cant of our 
 day, which resents all attempts to analyze bad opin- 
 ions down to their roots in bad dispositions, is prone 
 to dismiss the great theological criminals of history 
 with the smooth remark that they were sincere in 
 their Satanic inhumanities. They used the rack and 
 the hot iron, — they maimed, tormented, gibbeted, 
 burned, beheaded, crucified, it is true ; but then they 
 practised these little diablerie from a sincere sense 
 of duty! Sincere, indeed ! To be sure they were sin- 
 cere. They acted honestly and directly from their 
 characters. Their thoughts, feelings, deeds, — all were 
 of a piece. But out of what interior hell must such 
 devil's notions of duty and Deity have sprung? 
 How much better it w**ald be to strike at the heart 
 of the matter, and acknowledge at once, in the sharp* 
 8»
 
 58 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 incisive sarcasm of Bishop Warburton, that these 
 men acted thus because " they made God after man's 
 image, and took the worst possible models at that, — 
 •Jiemselves." 
 
 If human life, in so many departments of thought 
 *nd action, thus sparkles or glares with eccentrio 
 characters, it is evident that they must occupy a 
 large space in the world's representative literature, 
 mdeed, from Aristophanes down to Thackeray, genius, 
 hough often itself bristling with eccentricities, has 
 •een quick to discern, and cunning to embody, the 
 ■eccentricities of others. The representation has been 
 •scornful or genial according as wit or humor has 
 predominated in the observing mind. In a majority 
 ♦f cases, however, the whims, caprices, crotchets, rui- 
 ng passions, intrusive egotisms, which make their 
 possessors butts or bores to common sense, are by the 
 «oan of mirthful genius so brightened, interpreted, 
 noftened, and humanized, and made to glide into such 
 ludicrous forms of grotesque character, that they are 
 converted into attractive boon companions in the fes- 
 tivities of mind. Two great writers in English liter- 
 ature, Shakespeare and Scott, have been pre-eminently 
 luccessful in this embodiment of eccentric character 
 Shakespeare individualizing its various kinds, Scott 
 imitating its individual specimens. Lower in th#
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 59 
 
 •cale, and v» 'dely differing in their manner, are Ben 
 Jonson, Vanbrugh, Fielding, Smollett, Miss Burney, 
 Thackeray, Dickens. The author of " Tristram Shan- 
 dy" occupies in literature a delicious and original 
 little world of his own, answering to the quaint 
 craze in the fine creative genius of Laurence Sterne. 
 Addison, another original, has made oddities the ob- 
 jects of affection by insinuating into them the shy 
 humanities of his beneficent humor ; and in Sir Roger 
 de Coverley has clothed eccentricity with innocence 
 and sanctified it with love, while he has made it 
 touch and unseal those fountains of merriment which 
 sleep in the innermost recesses of the heart. Our 
 own Irving, who felt the attraction of Addison's 
 beautiful reserve while in the act of rushing off* him- 
 self into caricature, commenced his career by welcom- 
 ing the broader outlines of eccentricity with riotous, 
 roaring laughter, and ended with surveying its finer 
 shades with a demure smile. Goldsmith, again, half 
 lovingly, half-laughingly, pictures forth foibles of 
 vanity, and caprices of benevolence, and amiable lit- 
 tle crotchets of understanding, which he discerns peep- 
 ing slyly out from corners and crevices of his own 
 v_sy brain. You can almost hear and see these wits 
 and humorists through .he expressive movement of 
 their respective styles. Steele titters as he delineates.
 
 60 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 Dryden chuckles, Swift scowls, Pope hiv.cs, as, in wit 
 which is to provoke the mirth of millions, they endow 
 Borne dunce with the immortality of contempt. And 
 then the more genial and subtle of the humorists 
 have such an art in allowing character to develop 
 itself! The folly, or erratic disposition, or queer twist 
 of mind or morals, seems to leak out unwittingly, to 
 escape unawares. The man is self-exposed without 
 being himself conscious of exposure, and goes on 
 cfarming your interest or pity in words which excite 
 your mirth or scorn. It is like Captain Rcok's at- 
 tempt to rouse the sympathy of his fashionable i'riend9 
 for his losses at the gaming-table. " I lost," he says, 
 "four thousand pounds last nijjht, and the worst of 
 it is, five pounds were in cash." 
 
 In these writers, however, eccentricity is viewed 
 more or less didactically or dramatically. There aie 
 others whose eccentricities are personal, and shape 
 and color all they see and describe. Such are Ful 
 ler, Burton, and Sir Thomas Browne. But perhaps 
 the most delightful and popular of this class is Cliarles 
 Lamb, — a man cosily domesticated by the heart's 
 Ireside of his readers. Such wit, such humor, such 
 pagination, such intelligence, such sentiment, such 
 kindliness, such heroism, all so quaintly mixed and 
 mingled, and stuttering out in so freakish a fashion.
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 61 
 
 and all blending so finely in that exquisite eccentric 
 gomething which we call the character of Charles 
 Lamb, make him the most lovable of writers and 
 men. His essays, the gossip of creative genius, are 
 of a piece with the reoords of his life and conversa- 
 tion. Whether saluting his copy of Chapman's " Ho- 
 mer" with a kiss, — or saying a grace before reading 
 Milton, — or going to the theatre to see his own farce 
 acted, and joining in the hisses of the pit when it 
 fails, — or sagely wondering if the Ogles of Somerset 
 are not descendants of King Lear, — or telling Bar- 
 ry Cornwall not to invite a lugubrious gentleman to 
 dinner because his face would cast a damp over a 
 funeral, — or giving as a reason why he did not leave 
 off smoking, the difficulty of finding an equivalent 
 vice, — or striking into a hot controversy between 
 Coleridge and Ilolcroft, as to whether man as he is, 
 or man as he is to be, is preferable, and settling the 
 dispute by saying, " Give me man as he is not to 
 be," — or doing some deed of kindness and love with 
 tears in his eyes and a pun on his lips, — he is al- 
 ways the same dear, strange, delightful companion and 
 friend. He is never — the rogue — without a scrap 
 of logic to astound common sense. " Mr. Lamb," 
 Bays the head clerk at the India House, "you come 
 down very late in the morning ! " " Yes, 6ir," Mr
 
 62 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 Lamb replies, " but then you know T go home very 
 early in the afternoon." And then with what hu- 
 morous extravagance he expresses his peevishness at 
 being confined to such work, — with curious ingenuity 
 running his malediction on commerce along all its 
 lines of influence. " Confusion blast all mercantile 
 transactions, all traffic, exchange of commodities, in- 
 tercourse between nations, all the consequent civiliza- 
 tion, and wealth, and amity, and link of society, and 
 getting rid of prejudices, and knowledge of the face 
 of the globe ; and rot all the firs of the forest, that 
 look so romantic alive, and die into desks." It is 
 impossible to cheat this frolicsome humorist with any 
 pretence, any exaggerated sentiment, any of the do- 
 me-goodisms of well-meaning moral feebleness. A lady 
 Bends him " Ccelebs in Search of a Wife," for his pe- 
 rusal and guidance. He returns it with this quatrain 
 written on a fly-leaf, expressing the slight disagree- 
 ment between his views of matrimony and those en- 
 tertained by Miss Hannah More: — 
 
 " If ever I marry a wife, 
 
 I '11 marry a landlord's daughter. 
 And sit in the bar all day, 
 
 And drink cold brandy and water." 
 
 If he thus slips out of controversy by making the 
 broadest absurdities Ine venicles ot the nnest insijjht
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 63 
 
 his sense and enjoyment of absurdities in others risea 
 to rapture. The nonsensical ingenuity of the pam- 
 phlet in which his friend Capel Lofft took the ground 
 that Napoleon, while in the hands of the English, 
 might sue out a writ of habeas corpus, threw him into 
 ecstasies. And not only has he quips and quirks and 
 twisted words for all he sees and feels, but he has 
 the pleasantest art of making his very maladies in- 
 teresting by transmuting them into jests. Out of the 
 darkest depths of the " dismals " fly some of his hap- 
 piest conceits. " My bedfellows," he writes to Words- 
 worth, " are cough and cramp. We sleep three in a 
 bed." " How is it," he says, " that I cannot get rid 
 of this cold ? It can't be from a lack of care. I have 
 studiously been out all these rainy nights until twelve 
 o'clock, have had my feet wet constantly, drank co- 
 piously of brandy to allay inflammation, and done 
 everything else to cure it, and yet it won't depart," 
 ■ — a sage decision, worthy of that illustrious physi 
 eian who told his patient that, if he had no serious 
 drawbacks, he would probably be worse in a week. 
 To crown all, and to make the character perfect in 
 \ts winning contradictions, there beats beneath the 
 ."antHstie covering and incalculable caprices of the 
 humorist the best heart in the world, capable of cour- 
 tesy, of friendship, of love, of heroic self-devotion, and 
 unostentatious self-sacrifice.
 
 64 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 
 
 In this desultory survey of some of the expressions 
 of eccentric character in social life, in politics, in re- 
 ligion, in literature, we have aimed to exhibit eccen- 
 tricity in its principles as far as so slippery, elastic, 
 and elusive a quality will consent to submit itself to 
 the limits of definition. We have endeavored to show 
 that it is a deviation from reason and common sense 
 for the gratification of self-will or the indulgence of 
 some original craze in the faculties, and that this de- 
 viation tends to levity or malignity according as the 
 nature is sweet or savage. We have seen that, airy, 
 innocent, and sportive as it may be in the whims of 
 beautiful natures, it has often led to follies so gross, 
 and crimes so enormous, that their actors seem to 
 have escaped from their humanity into brutes or de- 
 mons. And in this slight view of the morbid phe- 
 nomena of human nature we cannot fail to see how 
 important is that pressure on the individual of insti- 
 tutions and other minds to keep his, caprices in check, 
 and educate and discipline him into reason and use^ 
 fulness, and what a poor mad creature a man is 
 likely to become when this pressure is removed. 
 Freedom no less than order is the product of inward 
 r outward restraint ; and that large and liberal dis- 
 course of intelligence which thinks into the meaning 
 l»f institutions, and enters into communion with other
 
 ECCENTRIC CHARACTER. 66 
 
 minds, — which is glad to believe that the reason of 
 the race through sixty centuries of gradual develop- 
 ment carries with it more authority than some wild 
 freak or flash of its owi ■ onceit, — this it is which 
 emancipates man from egotism, passion, and folly ; 
 which puts into his will the fine instinct of wisdom ; 
 which makes him tolerant as well as earnest, and 
 merciful as well as just ; which connects his thoughts 
 with things, and opens a passage for them into the 
 common consciousness of men ; and which, chaining 
 impulse to liberate intelligence, and rounding in ec- 
 centricity with the restraints of reason, enlarges his 
 intellect only to inform his conscience, doubles his 
 power by giving it a right direction, and purifies his 
 nature from vanity, and self-will, to bind him, in the 
 beneficent bonds of a common sympathy and a com- 
 mon sense, to the rights, interests, and advancement 
 at a comma a humanity.
 
 ffl. 
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 THE desire, the duty, the necessity of the age 
 in which we live is education, or that culture 
 which develops, enlarges, and enriches each individ- 
 ual intelligence, according to the measure of its ca- 
 pacity, by familiarizing it with the facts and laws of 
 nature and human life. But, in this rage for infor- 
 mation, we too often overlook the mental constitution 
 of the being we would inform, — detaching the ap- 
 prehensive from the active powers, weakening char- 
 acter by overloading memory, and reaping a harvest 
 of imbeciles after we may have flattered ourselvea 
 we had sown a crop of geniuses. No person can be 
 called educated, until he has organized his knowledge 
 into faculty, and can wield it as a weapon. We 
 purpose, therefore, to invite the attention of our read- 
 ers to some remarks on Intellectual Character, the 
 last and highest result of intellectual education, and 
 the indispensable condition of intellectual success. 
 It is evident, that, when a young man leaves hii
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 67 
 
 school or college to take his place in the world, it 
 is indispensable that he be something as well as know 
 something ; and it will require but little experience 
 to demonstrate to him that what he really knows is 
 little more than what he really is, and that his pro- 
 gress in intellectual manhood is not more determined 
 oy the information he retains, than by that portion 
 which, by a benign provision of Providence, he is 
 enabled to forget. Youth, to be sure, is his, — youth, 
 in virtue of which he is free of the universe, — youth, 
 with its elastic vigor, its far-darting hopes, its gener- 
 ous impatience of prudent meanness, its grand denial 
 of instituted falsehood, its beautiful contempt of ac- 
 credited baseness, — but youth which must now con- 
 centrate its wayward energies, which must discourse 
 with facts and grapple with men, and, through strife, 
 and struggle, and the sad wisdom of experience, must 
 pass from the vague delights of generous impulses 
 to the assured joy of manly principles. The moment 
 he comes in contact with the stern and stubborn re- 
 alities which frown on his entrance into practical life, 
 he will find that power is the soul of knowledge, and 
 character the condition of intelligence. He will dis- 
 cover that intellectual success depends primarily on 
 qualities which are jiot strictly intellectual, but per- 
 K>nnl and constitutional. The test of success is in.
 
 68 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 fluence, — that is, the power of shaping events by 
 informing, guiding, animating, controlling other minds 
 Whether this influence be exerted directly in the 
 world of practical affairs, or indirectly in the world 
 of ideas, its fundamental condition is still force of in- 
 dividual being, and the amount of influence is the 
 measure of the degree of force, just as an effect 
 measures a cause. The characteristic of intellect is 
 insight, — insight into things and their relations ; but 
 then this insight is intense or languid, clesr or con- 
 fused, comprehensive or narrow, exactly in proportion 
 to the weight and power of the individual who sees 
 and combines. It is not so much the into Uect that 
 makes the man, as the man the intellect ; in every 
 act of earnest thinking, the reach of the thought 
 depends on the pressure of the will ; and we would 
 therefore emphasize and enforce, as the primitive re- 
 quirement of intellectual success, that discipline of 
 the individual which develops dim tendencies into 
 po>itive sentiments, sentiments into ideas, and ideas 
 into abilities, — that discipline by which intellect is 
 penetrated through and through with the qnalitief* 1/ 
 manhood, and endowed with arms as well ^s e) <» 
 This is Intellectual Character. 
 
 Now it should be thundered in the ears <A every 
 foung man who has passed through that <y* rse of
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 69 
 
 nstruction ironically styled education, " What do you 
 intend to be, and what do you intend to do ? Do 
 you purpose to play at living, or do you purpose to 
 live ? — to be a memory, a word-cistern, a feeble 
 prater on illustrious themes, one of the world's thou- 
 sand chatterers, or a will, a power, a man ? No 
 varnish and veneer of scholarship, no command of 
 the tricks of logic and rhetoric, can ever make you 
 a positive force in the world. Look around you in 
 the community of educated men, and see how many, 
 who started on their career with minds as bright and 
 eager, and hearts as hopeful as yours, have been 
 mysteriously arrested in their growth, — have lost all 
 the kindling sentiments which glorified their youthful 
 gtudies, and dwindled into complacent echoes of sur- 
 rounding mediocrity, — have begun, indeed, to die on 
 the very threshold of manhood, and stand in society 
 as tombs rather than temples of immortal souls. See, 
 too, the wide disconnection between knowledge and 
 life; heaps of information piled upon little heads; 
 everybody speaking, — few who have earned the 
 right to speak ; maxims enough to regenerate a uni- 
 verse, — a woful lack of great hearts, in which rea- 
 son, right, and truth, regal and militant, are fortified 
 Mid encamped ! Now this disposition to skulk the 
 Austere requirements of intellectual growth in an in
 
 70 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 dolent surrender of the mind's power of self direction 
 must be overcome at the outset, or, in spite cf your 
 grand generalities, you will be at the mercy of every 
 bullying lie, and strike your colors to every mean 
 truism, and shape your life in accordance with every 
 low motive, which the strength of genuine wickedness 
 or genuine stupidity can bring to bear upon you ! " 
 There is no escape from slavery, or the mere pre- 
 tence of freedom, but in radical individual power ; 
 and all solid intellectual culture is simply the right 
 development of individuality into its true intellectual 
 form. 
 
 And first, at the risk of being considered meta- 
 physical, — though we fear no metaphysician would 
 indorse the charge, — let us define what we mean by 
 individuality; for the word is commonly made to sig- 
 nify some peculiarity or eccentricity, some unreason- 
 able twist, of mind or disposition. An individual, 
 then, in the sense in which we use the term, is a 
 causative spiritual force, whose root and being are in 
 eternity, but who lives, grows, and builds up his na- 
 ture in time. All the objects of sense and thought 
 all facts and ideas, all things, are external to his 
 essential personality. But he has, bound up in hi« 
 personal being, sympathies and capacities which ally 
 him with external objects, and enable him to trans-
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 71 
 
 mute their inner spirit and substance into his own 
 personal life. The process of his growth, therefore, 
 is a development of power from within to assimilate 
 objects from without, the power increasing with every 
 vital exercise of it. The result of this assimilation 
 is character. Character is the spiritual body of the 
 person, and represents the individualization of vital 
 experience, the conversion of unconscious things into 
 self-conscious men. Sir Thomas Browne, in quaint 
 reference to the building up of our physical frame 
 through the food we eat. declares that we have all 
 been on our own trenchers ; and so, on the same 
 principle, our spiritual faculties can be analyzed into 
 impersonal facts and ideas, whose life and substance 
 we have converted into personal reason, imagination, 
 and passion. The fundamental characteristic of man 
 is spiritual hunger ; the universe of thought and mat- 
 ter is spiritual food. He feeds on Nature ; he feeds 
 on ideas ; he feeds, through art, science, literature, 
 and history, on the acts and thoughts of other minds ; 
 and could we take the mightiest thinker that ever 
 awed and controlled the world, and unravel his pow- 
 ers, and return their constituent particles to the mul- 
 titudinous objects whence they were derived, the last 
 probe of our analysis, after we had stripped him of 
 all his faculties, would touch that unquenchable fiery
 
 72 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 atom of personality which had organized round itseil 
 such a colossal body of mind, and which, in its sim- 
 ple naked energy, would still be capable of rehabili" 
 iating itself in the powers and passions of which it 
 had been shorn. 
 
 It results from this doctrine of the mind's growth, 
 that success in all the departments of life, over which 
 intellect holds dominion, depends, not merely on an 
 or-tside knowledge of the facts and laws connected 
 with each department, but on the assimilation of that 
 knowledge into instinctive intelligence and active 
 power. Take the good farmer, and you will find that 
 ideas in him are endowed with will, and can work. 
 Take the good general, and you will find that the 
 principles of his profession are inwrought into the 
 substance of his nature, and act with the velocity of 
 instincts. Take the good judge, and in him jurispru- 
 dence seems impersonated, and his opinions are au- 
 thorities. Take the good merchant, and you will find 
 that commerce, in its facts and laws, seems in him 
 embodied, and that his sagacity appears identical with 
 the objects on which it is exercised. Take the great 
 Statesman, take Webster, and note how, by thorough- 
 ly individualizing his comprehensive experience, he 
 geems to carry a nation in his brain ; how, in all 
 that relates *o the matter in hand, he has in him at
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 73 
 
 'acidly what is out of him in fact ; how between the 
 man and the thing there occurs that subtile free-ma' 
 Bonry of recognition which we call the mind's in- 
 tuitive glance ; and how conflicting principles and 
 statements, mixed and mingling in fierce confusion 
 and with deafening war-cries, fall into order and re- 
 lation and move in the direction of one inexorable 
 controlling idea, the moment they are grasped by 
 an intellect which is in the secret of their combina- 
 tion : — 
 
 " Confusion hears his voice, and the wild uproar stills." 
 
 Mark, too, how, in the productions of his mind, the 
 presence and pressure of his whole nature, in each 
 intellectual act, keep his opinions on the level of his 
 character, and stamps every weighty paragraph with 
 " Daniel Webster, his mark." The characteristic of 
 all his great speeches is, that the statements, argu- 
 ments, and images have what we should call a posi- 
 tive being of their own, — stand out as plainly to the 
 sight as a ledge of rocks or chain of hills, — and, like 
 the works of Nature herself, need no other justifica- 
 tion of their right to exist than the fact of their ex- 
 istence. We may dislike tbsir object, but we cannot 
 deny their solidity of organization. This power of 
 piving a substantial body, an undeniable external
 
 74 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 shape and form, to his thoughts and perceptions, M 
 that the toiling mind does not so much oeei» to pass 
 from one sentence to another, unfolding ito leading 
 idea, as to make each sentence a soHd woik in a 
 Torres -Vedras line of fortifications, — tl?is prodigious 
 constructive faculty, wielded with the strength of a 
 huge Samson-like artificer in the materfal of mind, 
 and welding together the substances it may not be 
 able to fuse, puzzled all opponents who understood 
 it not, and baffled the efforts of all who understood 
 it well. He rarely took a position on any political 
 question, which did not draw down upon him a whole 
 battalion of adversaries, with ingenious array of ar- 
 gument and infinite noise of declamation ; but after 
 the smoke and dust and clamor of the combat were 
 over, the speech loomed up perfect and whole, a per- 
 manent thing in history or literature, while the loud 
 thunders of opposition had too often died away into 
 low mutterings, audible only to the adventurous anti 
 quary who gropes in the " still air " of stale " Con 
 gressional Debates." The rhetoric of sentences how 
 ever melodious, of aphorisms however pointed, of ah 
 6tractions however true, cannot stand in the storm of 
 affairs against this true rhetoric, in which thought i« 
 jonsubstantiated with things. 
 
 Now in men of this stamp, who have so organized
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 75 
 
 knowledge into faculty that they have attained the 
 power of giving Thought the character of Fact, we 
 notice no distinction between power of intellect and 
 power of will, but an indissoluble union and fusion 
 of force and insight. Facts and laws are so blended 
 with their personal being, that we can hardly decide 
 whether it is thought that wills, or will that thinks. 
 Their actions display the intensest intelligence ; their 
 thoughts come from them clothed in the thews and 
 sinews of energetic volition. Their force, being pro- 
 portioned to their intelligence, never issues in that 
 wild and anarchical impulse, or that tough, obstinate, 
 narrow wilfulness, which many take to be the char- 
 acteristic of individualized power. They may, in fact, 
 exhibit no striking individual traits which stand im- 
 pertinently prominent, and yet from this very cause 
 be all the more potent and influential individualities. 
 Indeed, in the highest efforts of ecstatic action, when 
 the person is mightiest, and amazes us by the giant 
 leaps of his intuition, the mere peculiarities of his 
 personality are unseen and unfelt. This is the case 
 with Homer, Shakespeare, and Goethe, in poetry, — 
 with Plato and Bacon, in philosophy, — with Nowton, 
 jn science, — with Caesar, in war. Such men doubt- 
 k e*l had peculiarities and caprices, but they were 
 * «rnt and purged away " by the fire of their geniua,
 
 79 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 when its action was intensest. Then their whole 
 natures were melted down into pure force and insight, 
 and the impression they leave upon the mind is the 
 impression of marvellous force and weight and reach 
 af thought. 
 
 If it be objected, that these high examples are fit- 
 -ted to provoke despair rather than stimulate emulation, 
 the answer is, that they contain, exemplify, and em- 
 phasize the principles, and flash subtile hints of the 
 processes, of all mental growth and production. How 
 comes it that these men's thoughts radiate from them 
 as a _i s, endowed not only with an illuminating, but 
 a penetrating and animating power ? The answer to 
 this is a statement of the genesis, not merely of gen- 
 ius, but of every form of intellectual manhood ; for 
 such thoughts do not leap, a la Minerva, full-grown 
 from the head, but are struck off in those moments 
 when the whole nature of the thinker is alive and 
 aglow with an inspiration kindled long before in re- 
 mote recesses of consciousness from one spark of im- 
 mortal lire, and unweariedly burning, burning, burning, 
 until it lit up the whole inert mass of surrounding 
 mind in flame. 
 
 To show, indeed, how little there is of the off- 
 hand, the haphazard, the hit-or-miss, in the charactei 
 tf creative thought, and how completely the gladdest
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 77 
 
 nsjwration Li earned, let us glance at the psychologi- 
 cal history of one of those imperial ideas which 
 measure the power, test the quality, and convey the 
 life, of the minds that conceive them. The progress 
 of such an idea is from film to form. It has its 
 origin in an atmosphere of feeling ; for the first vital 
 movement of the mind is emotional, and is expressed 
 in a dim tendency, a feeble feeling after the object, 
 or the class of objects, related to the peculiar consti- 
 tution and latent affinities of its individual being. 
 This tendency gradually condenses and deepens into 
 a sentiment, pervading the man with a love of those 
 objects, — by a sweet compulsion ordering his ener- 
 gies in their direction, — and by slow degrees invest- 
 ing them, through a process of imagination, with the 
 attribute of beauty, and, through a process of reason, 
 investing the purpose with which he pursues them 
 with the attribute of intelligence. The object dilates 
 as the mind assimilates and the nature moves, so that 
 every step in this advance from mere emotion to 
 vivid insight is a building up of the faculties which 
 each onward mo\ jinent evokes and exercises, — sen- 
 timent, imagination, reason increasing their power and 
 enlarging their scope with each impetus that speeds 
 them on to their bright and beckoning goal. Then, 
 •Then the individual has reached his full mental stat-
 
 78 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 are, and come in direct contact with the object, then, 
 only then, does he " pluck out the heart of its mys- 
 tery" in one of those lightning-like acts of thought 
 which we call combination, invention, discovery. There 
 is no luck, no accident, in all this. Nature does not 
 rapriciously scatter her secrets as golden gifts to lazy 
 pets and luxurious darlings, but imposes tasks when 
 she presents opportunities, and uplifts him whom sho 
 would inform. The apple that she drops at the feet 
 of Newton is but a coy invitation to follow her to 
 the stars. 
 
 Now this living process of developing manhood and 
 building up mind, while the person is on the trail of 
 a definite object of intelligence, is in continual dan- 
 ger of being devitalized into a formal process of mere 
 acquisition,- which, though it may make students 
 prodigies of memory, will be sure to leave them lit- 
 tle men. Their thoughts will be the attaches, not the 
 offspring, of their minds. They will have a bowing 
 acquaintance with many truths, without being admitted 
 to the familiarity of embracing or shaking hands with 
 one. If they have native stamina of animal consti- 
 tution, they may become men of passions and opinions, 
 b it they never will become men of sentiments and 
 ideas; they may know the truth as it is about a thing, 
 wd support it with acrid and wrangling dogmatism
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 79 
 
 but they rmwr will know the truth as it is in the 
 thing, and support it with faith and insight. And the 
 moment they come into collision with a really live 
 man. they will find their souls inwardly wither, and 
 their boasted acquisitions fall away, before one glance 
 of his irradiating intelligence and one stroke of his 
 emiting will. If, on the contrary, they are gu.dei 
 by good or great sentiments, which are the souls of 
 good or great ideas, these sentiments will be sure to 
 organize all the capacity there is in them into posi- 
 tive intellectual character; but let them once divorce 
 love from their occupations in life, and they will find 
 that labor will degenerate into drudgery, and drudg- 
 ery will weaken the power to labor, and weakness, as 
 a last resort, will intrench itself in pretence and de- 
 ception. If they are in the learned professions, they 
 will become tricksters in law, quacks in medicine, for- 
 malists in divinity, though regular practitioners in all; 
 s.nd clients will be cheated, and patients will be poi- 
 Boned, and parishioners will be — we dare not say 
 what ! — though all the colleges in the universe had 
 showered on them their diplomas. " To be weak is 
 miserable " : Milton wrested that secret from Ihe Devil 
 Himself! — but what shall we say of those whose 
 Weakness has subsided from misery into complacency 
 and wh| feel all the morai might of their being houn
 
 80 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 Iy rust and decay, with the most amiable indifference 
 Mid lazy content with dissolution ? 
 
 Now this weakness is a mental and moral sickness, 
 pointing the way to mental and moral death. It has 
 its source in a violation of that law which makes the 
 health of the mind depend on its activity being di- 
 rected to an object. When directed on itself, it be- 
 comes fitful and moody ; and moodiness generates 
 morbidness, and morbidness misanthropy, and misan- 
 thropy self-contempt, and self-contempt begins the 
 work of self-dissolution. Why, every sensible man 
 will despise himself, if he concentrates his attention 
 on that important personage ! The joy and confi- 
 dence of activity come from its being fixed and fast- 
 ened on things external to itself. " The human 
 heart," says Luther, — and we can apply the remark 
 as well to the human mind, — " is like a millstone in 
 a mill ; when you put wheat under it, it turns, and 
 grinds, and bruises the wheat into flour ; if you put 
 no wheat in, it still grinds on, but then it is itself it 
 grinds, and slowly wears away." Now activity for 
 an object, which is an activity that constantly in- 
 creases the power of acting, and keeps the mind glad, 
 fresh, vigorous, and young, has three deadly enemies 
 — intellectual indolence* intellectual conceit, and in 
 s ellectual fear. We will say a few words on the 
 iperation ol this triad of mali^nrnita
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER 81 
 
 Montaigne relates, that, while once walking in the 
 fields, he was accosted by a beggar of Herculean 
 frame, who solicited alms. " Are you not ashamed 
 to beg ? " said the philosopher, with a frown, — 
 K you who are so palpably able to work ? " " O, 
 Bir," was the sturdy knave's drawling rejoinder, " if 
 you only knew how lazy I am ! " Herein is the whole 
 philosophy of idleness ; and we are afraid that many 
 a student of good natural capacity slips and slides 
 from thought into revery, and from re very into ap- 
 athy, and from apathy into incurable indisposition to 
 think, with as much sweet unconsciousness of degra- 
 dation as Montaigne's mendicant evinced ; and at last 
 hides from himself the fact of his imbecility of action, 
 Bomewhat as Sir James Herring accounted for the 
 fact that he could not rise early in the morning: 
 he could, he said, make up his mind to it, but could 
 not make up his body. 
 
 " He who eats with the Devil," says the proverb, 
 "has need of a long spoon"; and he who domesti- 
 cates this pleasant vice of indolence, and allows it to 
 nestle near his will, has need of a long head. Or- 
 dinary minds may well be waichful of its insidious 
 approaches when great ones have mourned over its 
 enfeebling effects ; and the subtle indolence that stole 
 »ver the powers of Mackintosh, and gradually im- 
 
 4* *
 
 82 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 paired the productiveness even of Goethe, may well 
 scare intellects of less natural grasp, and imagination! 
 of less instinctive creativeness. Every step, indeed, 
 of the student's progress calls for energy and effort, 
 and every step is beset by some soft temptation to 
 abandon the task of developing power for the de- 
 light of following impulse. The appetites, for exam- 
 ple, instead of being bitted, and bridled, and trained 
 into passions, and sent through the intellect to quick 
 en, sharpen, and intensify its activity, are allowed to 
 take their way unmolested to their own objects of 
 sense, and drag the mind down to their own sensual 
 level. Sentiment decays, thu vision fades, faith in 
 principles departs, the moment that appetite rules. 
 On the closing doors of that " sensual stye," as over 
 the gate of Dante's hell, be it written : " Let those 
 who erter here leave hope behind." 
 
 But a more refined operation of this pestilent in- 
 dolence is its way of infusing into the mind the delu- 
 sive belief that it can attain the objects of activity 
 without its exercise. Under this illusion, men expect 
 o grow wise, as men who gamble in stocks expect 
 io grow rich, — by chance, and not by work. They 
 tivest in mediocrity in the confident hope that it 
 will go many hundred per cent above par ; and m 
 •hocking has been the inflation of the intellectual
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 83 
 
 tt/Tiriticy oi late years, that this speculation of indo- 
 lence s >metimes partially succeeds. But a revulsion 
 comes, — and then brass has to make a break-neck 
 descent to reach its proper level below gold. There 
 are others whom indolence deludes by some trash 
 about " fits " of inspiration, for whose Heaven-sent 
 spasms they are humbly to wait. There is, it seems, 
 a lucky thought somewhere in the abyss of possibil- 
 ity, which is somehow, at some time, to step out of 
 essence into substance, and take up its abode in their 
 capacious minds, — dutifully kept unoccupied in order 
 that the expected celestial visitor may not be crowded 
 for room. Chance is to make them king, and chance 
 to crown them without their stir ! There are others 
 still, who, while sloth is sapping the primitive energy 
 of their natures, expect to scale the fortresses of 
 knowledge by leaps and not by ladders, and who 
 count on success in such perilous gymnastics, not by 
 the discipline of the athlete, but by the dissipation 
 of the idler. Indolence, indeed, is never at a loss for 
 li smooth lie or delicious sophism to justify inaction, 
 and, in our day, has rationalized it into a philosophy 
 of the mind, and idealized it into a school of poetry, 
 and organized it into a " hospital of incapables." It 
 poraises you the still ecstasy of a divine repose, 
 while it lures you surely down into the vacant dui
 
 Si INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 ness of inglorious sloth. It provides a primrose path 
 to stagnant pools, to an Arcadia of thistles, and a 
 Paradise of mud. 
 
 But in a mind of any primitive power, intellectual 
 indolence is sure to generate intellectual conceit, — 
 a little Jack Horner, that ensconces itself in lazy 
 heads, and, while it dwarfs every power to the level 
 of its own littleness, keeps vociferating, " What a great 
 man am I ! " It is the essential vice of this glib imp 
 of the mind, even when it infests large intellects, 
 that it puts Nature in the possessive case, — labels 
 all its inventions and discoveries " My truth," — and 
 moves about the realms of art, science, and letters 
 in a constant fear of having its pockets picked. 
 Think of a man having vouchsafed to him one of 
 those awful glimpses into the mysteries of creation 
 which should be received with a shudder of prayer- 
 ful joy, and taking the gracious boon with a smirk 
 of all-satisfied conceit ! One page in what Shake- 
 speare calls " Nature's infinite book of secrecy " flies 
 a moment open to his eager gaze, and he hears the 
 iustling of the myriad leaves as they close and clasp, 
 only to make his spirit more abject, his vanity more 
 ravenous, his hatred of rivals more rancorous and 
 wean. That grand unselfish love of *ruth, and joy 
 In its discovery, by whomsoever made, which cbarao
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 85 
 
 *erite the true seeker and seer of science and creative 
 art, alone can keep the mind alive and alert, alone 
 can make the possession of truth a means of elevat- 
 ing and purifying the man. 
 
 But if this conceit, in powerful natures, tend8 to 
 belittle character, and eat into and consume the very 
 faculties whose successful exercise creates it, its slyly 
 insinuated venom works swifter and deadlier on youth 
 and inexperience. The ordinary forms of conceit, it 
 is true, cannot well flourish in any assemblage of 
 young men, whose plain interest it is to undeceive 
 all self-deception and quell every insurrection of in- 
 dividual vanity, and who soon understand the art of 
 burning the nonsense out of an offending brother by 
 caustic ridicule and slow-roasting sarcasm. But there 
 is danger of mutual deception, springing from a com 
 mon belief in a false but attractive principle of cul- 
 ture. The mischief of intellectual conceit in our day 
 consists in its arresting mental growth at the start 
 by stuffing the mind with the husks of pretentious 
 generalities, which, while they impart no vital power 
 and convey no real information, give seeming enlarge- 
 ment to thought, and represent a seeming opulence 
 of knowledge. The deluded student, who picks up 
 \»e»3 ideas in masquerade at the rag-fairs and old- 
 tlothes shops of philosoiny, thinks he has the key
 
 86 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 to »U secrets and the solvent of all problems, when 
 he really has no experimental knowledge of anything, 
 and dwindles all the more for every juieeless, unnu 
 tritious abstraction he devours. Though famished for 
 the lack of a morsel of the true mental food of facts 
 and ideas, he still svvaggeringly despises all relative 
 Information in his ambition to clutch at absolute truth, 
 and accordingly goes directly to ultimates by the short 
 juts of cheap generalities. Why, to be sure, should 
 he, who can, Napoleon-like, march straight on to the 
 interior capital, submit, Marlborough-like, to the 
 drudgery of besieging the frontier fortresses ? Why 
 Bhould he, who can throw a girdle of generalization 
 roujd the universe in less than forty minutes, stoop 
 to master details ? And this easy and sprightly am- 
 plitude of understanding, which consists not in includ- 
 ing but in excluding all relative facts and principles, 
 he calls comprehensiveness ; the mental decrepitude it 
 occasions he dignifies with the appellation of repose ; 
 and, on the strength of comprehensiveness and repose, 
 he is of course qualified to take his seat beside Shake- 
 speare, and chat cosily with Bacon, and wink know- 
 ingly at Goethe, and startle Leibnitz with a slap on 
 the shoulder, — the true Red-Republican sign of liberty 
 in manners, equality in power, and fraternity in ideas 
 These men, to be sure, have a way of saying thingi
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 87 
 
 which he has not yet caught; but then their wide- 
 reaching thoughts are his as well as theirs. Imitating 
 the condescension of some contemporary philosophers 
 of the Infinite, he graciously accepts Christianity and 
 patronises the idea of Deity, though he gives you to 
 understand that he could easily pitch a generalization 
 outside of both. And thus, mistaking his slab-sided- 
 ness for many-sidedness, and forgetting that there is 
 no insight without force to back it, — bedizened in 
 conceit and magnificent in littleness, — he is thrown 
 on society, walking in a vain show of knowledge, and 
 doomed to be up>et and trampled on by the first 
 brawny concrete Fact he stumbles against. A true 
 method of culture makes drudgery beautiful by pre- 
 senting a vision of the object to which it leads; — 
 beware of the conceit that dispenses with it ! How 
 much hetter it is to delve for a little solid knowledge, 
 and be sure of that, than to be a proper target for 
 such a sarcasm as a great statesman once shot at a 
 glib advocate, who was saying nothing with great 
 fluency and at great length ! " Who," he asked, " is 
 this self-sufficient, all-sufficient, insufficient man?'* 
 
 Idleness and Conceit, however, are not more op- 
 posed to lhat out-springing, reverential activity which 
 makes the person forget himself in devotion to his 
 objects, than Fear. A bold heart in a sound head, — ■
 
 88 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 that is the condition of energetic thinking, of the 
 thought that thinks round things, and into things, and 
 through things ; but fear freezes activity at its inmost 
 fountains. " There is nothing," says Montaigne, " that 
 I fear so much as fear." Indeed, an educated man, 
 who creeps along with an apologetic air, cringing to 
 this name and ducking to that opinion, and hoping 
 that it is not too presumptuous in him to beg the right 
 to exist, — why, it is a spectacle piteous to gods and 
 hateful to men ! Yet think of the many knots of 
 mcnitory truisms in which activity is likely to be 
 taught and entangled at the outset, — knots which a 
 brave purpose will not waste time to untie, but in- 
 stantly cuts. First, there is the nonsense of students 
 killing themselves by over-study, — some few instances 
 of which, not traceable to over-eating, have shielded 
 the shortcomings of a million idlers. Next, there is 
 the fear that the intellect may be developed at the 
 expense of the moral nature, — one of 'hose truths in 
 the abstract which are made to do tne office of lies 
 in the application, and which are calculated not so 
 much to make good men as goodies, — persons re- 
 joicing in an equal mediocrity of morals and mind, 
 and pertinent examples of the necessity of personal 
 force to convert moral maxims into moral might 
 The truth would seem to be, that half the crimes and
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 89 
 
 lutFei-ings which history records and observation fur- 
 nishes are directly traceable to want of thought 
 rather than to bad intention ; and in regard to the 
 other half, which may be referred to the remorseless 
 selfishness of unsanctified intelligence, has that selfish- 
 ness ever had more valuable allies and tools than the 
 mental torpor that cannot think and the conscientious 
 stupidity that will not? Moral laws, indeed, are in- 
 tellectual facts, to be investigated as well as obeyed ; 
 and it is not a blind or blear-eyed conscience, but a 
 conscience blended with intelligence and consolidated 
 with character, that can both see and act. 
 
 Bu* curtly dismissing the fallacy, that the moral 
 and spiritual faculties are likely to find a sound basis 
 in a cowed and craven reason, we come to a form 
 of fear that practically paralyzes independent thought 
 more than any other, while it is incompatible with 
 manliness and self-respect. This fear is compounded 
 of self-distrust and that mode of vanity which cowers 
 beneath the invective of men whose applause it nei- 
 ther courts nor values. If you examine critically the 
 two raging parties of conservatism and radicalism, you 
 will find that a goodly number of their partisans are 
 men who have not chosen their position, but have 
 oeen bullied into it, — men who see clearly enough 
 that both parties are based on principles almost
 
 90 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 equally true in themselves, almost equally false bj 
 being detached from their mutual relations. But then 
 each party keeps its professors of intimidation and 
 Btainers of character, whose business it is to deprive 
 men of the luxury of large thinking, and to drive all 
 neutrals into their respective ranks. The missiles 
 hurled from one side are disorganize^ infidel, disun- 
 ionist, despiser of law, and other trumpery of that 
 sort ; from the other side, the no less effective ones 
 of murderer, dumb dog, traitor to humanity, and oth- 
 er trumpery of that sort ; and the young and sensi- 
 tive student finds it difficult to keep the poise of his 
 nature amid the cross-fire of this logic of fury and 
 rhetoric of execration, and too often ends in joining 
 one party from fear, or the other from the fear of 
 being thought afraid. The probability is, that the 
 least danger to his mental independence will proceed 
 from any apprehension he may entertain of what are 
 irreverently styled the "old fogies"; for if Young 
 America goes on at its present headlong rate, there 
 is little doubt that the old fogy will have to descend 
 from his eminence of place, become an object of 
 pathos rather than terror, and be compelled to make 
 the inquiring appeal to his brisk hunters, so ofteu 
 made to himself in vain, " Am I not a mau and a 
 Brother ?" But, with whatever association, politic*.
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 91 
 
 i>r moral, the thinker may connect himself, let him 
 yo in, and not be dragged in or scared in. He 
 certainly can do no good to himself, his country, or 
 his race by being the slave and echo of the heads 
 of a clique. Besides, as most organizations are con- 
 stituted on the principles of a sort of literary social- 
 ism, and each member lives and trades on a common 
 capital of phrases, there is danger that these phrases 
 may decline from signs into substitutes of thought, 
 and both intellect and character evaporate in words 
 Thus, a man may be a Union man and a National 
 man, or an Anti-Slavery man and a Temperance man 
 and a Woman's-Rights man, and still be very little 
 of a man. There is, indeed, no more ludicrous sight 
 than to see Mediocrity, perched on one of these re- 
 Bounding adjectives, strut and bluster, and give it- 
 self braggadocio airs, and dictate to all quiet men its 
 maxims of patriotism or morality, and all the while 
 be but a living illustration through what grandeurs 
 of opinion essential meanness and poverty of soul 
 will peer and peep and be disclosed. To be a states- 
 man or reformer requires a courage that dares defy 
 dictation from any quarter, and a mind which has 
 tome in direct contact with the great inspiring ideas 
 of country and humanity. All the rest is spite, and 
 lpleen, and cant, and conceit, and words.
 
 92 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 It is plain, of course, that every man of large and 
 living thought will naturally sympathize with those 
 great social movements, informing and reforming, 
 which are the glory of the age; but it must always 
 be remembered that the grand and generous senti- 
 ments that underlie those movements demand in their 
 fervid disciple a corresponding grandeur and generos- 
 ity of soul. There is no reason why his philanthropy 
 Bhould be malignant because other men's conserva- 
 tism may be stupid ; and the vulgar insensibility to 
 the rights of the oppressed, and the vulgar scorn of 
 the claims of the wretched, which men calling them- 
 selves respectable and educated may oppose to his 
 own warmer feelings and nobler principles, should be 
 met, not with that invective which may be as vulgar 
 as the narrowness it denounces, nor always with that 
 indignation which is righteous as well as wrathful, 
 but with that awful contempt with which Magnanim- 
 ity shames meanness, simply by the irony of her 
 lofty example and the sarcasm of her terrible si- 
 lence. 
 
 In these remarks, which we trust our readers hava 
 at least been kind enough to consider worthy of an 
 effort of patience, we have attempted to connect al 
 genuine intellectual success with manliness of charac* 
 ter; ha\e endeavored to show that force of indivioV
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 93 
 
 aal being is its primary condition ; that this force is 
 augmented and enriched, or weakened and impover- 
 ished, according as it is or is not directed to ap- 
 propriate objects ; that indolence, conceit and fear 
 present continual checks to this going out of the 
 mind into glad and invigorating communion with facts 
 And laws ; and that as a man is not a mere bundle 
 of faculties, but a vital person, whose unity pervades, 
 vivifies, and creates all the varieties of his manifesta- 
 tion, the same vices which enfeeble and deprave 
 character tend to enfeeble and deprave intellect. 
 But perhaps we have not sufficiently indicated a dis- 
 eased state of consciousness, from which most intel- 
 lectual men have suffered, many have died, and all 
 should be warned, — the disease, namely, of mental dis- 
 gust, the sign and the result of mental debility. Men- 
 tal disgust "sicklies o'er" all the objects of thought, 
 extinguishes faith in exertion, communicates a dull 
 wretchedness to indolence in the very process by 
 which it makes activity impossible, and drags into its 
 own slough of despond, and discolors with its own 
 morbid reveries, the objects which it should ardently 
 leek and genially assimilate. It sees things neither 
 »s they are, nor as they are glorified and transfigured 
 by hope and health and faith ; but, in the apathy of 
 that idling introspection which betrays a genius foi
 
 94 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 
 
 misery, it pronounces effort to be vanity, and d©» 
 Bpairingiy dismisses knowledge as delusion. " De« 
 spair," says Donne, " is the damp of hell ; rejoicing 
 is the serenity if heaven." 
 
 Now contrast this mental disgust, which proceeds 
 from mental debility, with the sunny and soul-lifting 
 exhilaration radiated from mental vigor, — a vigot 
 which comes from the mind's secret consciousness 
 that it is in contact with moral and spiritual verities, 
 and is partaking of the rapture of their immortal life, 
 A spirit earnest, hopeful, energetic, inquisitive, mak- 
 ing its mistakes minister to wisdom, and converting 
 the obstacles it vanquishes into power, — a spirit in- 
 spired by a love of the excellency and beauty of 
 knowledge, which will not let it sleep, — such a spirit 
 soon learns that the soul of joy is hid in the austere 
 form of Duty, and that the intellect becomes brighter 
 keener, clearer, more buoyant, and more efficient, as 
 it feels the freshening vigor infused by her monitions 
 and menaces, and the celestial calm imparted by her 
 soul-satisfying smile. In all the professions and oc- 
 cupations over which Intellect holds dominion, the 
 student will find that there is no grace of character 
 without its corresponding grace of mind. lie will 
 find that virtue is an aid to insight ; that good and 
 •weet affections will bear a harvest of pure and higk
 
 INTELLECTUAL CHARACTER. 95 
 
 .noughts ; that patience will make the intellect per* 
 listent in plans which benevolence will make benefi- 
 cent in results ; that the austerities of conscience will 
 dictate precision to statements and exactness to argu- 
 ments ; that the same moral sentiments and moral 
 power which regulate the conduct of lite will illumine 
 the path and stimulate the purpose of those daring 
 spirits eager to add to the discoveries of truth s nd 
 the creations of art. And he will also find that this 
 purifying interaction of spiritual and mental forces will 
 give the mind an abiding foundation of joy for its 
 starts of rapture and flights of ecstasy; — a joy in 
 whose light and warmth, languor and discontent and 
 depression and despair will be charmed away ; — a 
 joy, which will make the mind large, generous, 
 hopeful, aspiring, in order to make life beautiful and 
 sweet; — a joy, in the words of an old divine, " which 
 will put on a more glorious garment above, and taa 
 joy superinvcsted in glory i "
 
 TV. 
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 ri^HE noblest and most exhilarating objects ol 
 -*- human contemplation are those which exhibit 
 human nature in its exalted aspects. Our hearts 
 instinctively throb and burn in sympathy with grand 
 thoughts and brave actions radiated from great char- 
 acters ; for they give palpable form to ideals of con 
 duct domesticated in all healthy imaginations, and 
 fulfil prophecies uttered in the depths of all aspiring 
 souls. They are, in fact, what all men feel they ought 
 to be. They inspire our weakness by the energy of 
 their strength ; they sting our pride by the irony of 
 their elevation. Their flights of thought and audacv 
 lies of action, which so provokingly mock our wise 
 <aws and proper ways, and which seem to cast om- 
 inous conjecture on the sanity of their minds, cannot 
 blind us to the fact that it is we and not they who 
 are unnatural; that nature, obstructed in common men 
 wisted into unnatural distortions, and only now am) 
 then stuttering into ideas, comes out in them freely
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 97 
 
 harmoniously, sublimely, all hinderances burnt away 
 by the hot human heart and flaming human sou] 
 which glow unconsumed within them. They are, in- 
 deed, so filled with the wine of life, so charged with 
 the electricity of mind, — they have, in Fletcher's fine 
 extravagance, "so much man thrust into them," — that 
 manhood must force its way out, and demonstrate if 
 innate grandeur and power. 
 
 This indestructible manhood, which thus makes for 
 itself a clear and clean path through all impediments, 
 is commonly called Heroism, or genius in action, — 
 genius that creatively clothes its ascending thoughts 
 in tough thews and sinews, uplifts character to the 
 level of ideas, and impassionates soaring imagination 
 into settled purpose. The hero, therefore, with his 
 intelligence all condensed into will, — compelled to 
 think in deeds, and find his language in events, — 
 his creative energy spending itself, not in making ep- 
 ics, but in making history, — and who thus brings 
 his own fiery nature into immediate, invigorating 
 contact with the nature of others, without the medi- 
 ation of the mist of words, — is, of course, the object 
 both of heartier love and of fiercer hatred than those 
 men of genius whose threatening thought is removed 
 to the safe ideal distance of Art. The mean-minded, 
 the little-hearted, and the pusillanimous of soul io 
 5 •
 
 98 HEROIC CHARACTER 
 
 Btinctively recognize him as their personal enemy j 
 are scared and cowed by the swift sweep of his dar« 
 ' ^g will, and wither inwardly as they feel the ominous 
 glance of his accusing eyes ; and they accordingly 
 intrench themselves and their kind in economic max- 
 ims and small bits of detraction, in sneers, suspicions, 
 cavils, scandals, in all the defences by which malice 
 and stupidity shut out from themselves, and strive to 
 shut out from others, the light that streams from a 
 great and emancipating nature. We must clear away 
 all this brushwood and undergrowth before the hero 
 can be seen in his full proportions ; and this will 
 compel us to sacrifice remorselessly to him that type 
 of human character which goes under the name of 
 the Sneak. 
 
 The fundamental peculiarity of this antithesis and 
 antagonist of the hero is his tendency to skulk and 
 evade the requirements of every generous, kindling, 
 and exalting sentiment which the human heart con- 
 tains. He has, to be sure, a feeble glimmer of 
 thought, a hesitating movement of conscience, a sick 
 ly perception that he exists as a soul, and his claim 
 to be considered a man must therefore be reluctantly 
 admitted ; but his soul is so puny, so famine- wasted 
 by fasting from the soul's appropriate diet, that he 
 knows of its existence only as an invalid knows of
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 99 
 
 »he eristen^e of his stomach, — by its qualms. This 
 »oul, however, is still essentially the soul of a sneak, 
 and its chief office appears to be to give malignity to 
 his littleness, by weakly urging him to hate all who 
 have more. This rancor of his has an inexpressible 
 felicity of meanness, which analysis toils after in vain. 
 His patriotism, his morality, his religion, his philan- 
 thropy, if he pretend to have any of these fine things, 
 are all infected with it, lose their nature in its pres- 
 ence, and dwindle into petty tributaries of its snarling 
 venom and spleen. It is compounded of envy, fear, 
 folly, obstinacy, malice, — all of them bad qualities. 
 but so modified in him by the extreme limitation of 
 his conceptions and the utter poltroonery of his char 
 acter, that we may well hesitate to call them bad. 
 He is, indeed, too small a creature to reach even tha 
 elevation of vice; and.no general term designating j> 
 Bin can be applied to him without doing injustice to the 
 dignity of evil and the respectabilities of the Satanic. 
 
 Mean as this poisonous bit of humanity is, he still 
 wields a wide influence over opinion by creeping 
 Btealthily into the recesses of other and larger minds, 
 and using their powers to give currency to his sen- 
 timents, lie thus dictates no inconsiderable portion 
 of the biography, criticism, history, politics, and belles 
 lettres in general circulation ; and, by a cunning
 
 100 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 misuse of the words prudence and practical wisaom^ 
 impudently teaches that disinterestedness is selfishness 
 in disguise, poetry a sham, heroism craft or insanity, 
 religion a convenient lie, and human life a cultivated 
 bog. We detect his venomous spirit in all those 
 eminent men whose abilities are exercised to degrade 
 man and wither up the springs of generous action. 
 Thus Dean Swift, in his description of the Yahoos, 
 combines the sentiment of the sneak with the faculty 
 of the satirist ; Rochefoucauld, in his " Maxims," the 
 sentiment of the sneak combined with the faculty of 
 the philosopher ; and Voltaire, in his " Pucelle," pre- 
 sents a more hideous combination still of sneak and 
 poet. 
 
 Having thus ruled out the evidence of this carica- 
 ture and caricaturist of humanity against the reality 
 of the heroic element in man, ,we may now proceed 
 to its analysis and description. And first, it is ne- 
 cessary to state that all vital ideas and purposes have 
 their beginning in sentiments. Sentiment is tho 
 living principle, the soul, of thought and volition, 
 determining the direction, giving the impetus, and 
 constituting the force, of faculties. Heroism is nc 
 extempore work of transient impulse, — a rocket rush 
 ! ng fretfully up to disturb the dargn(.6S by which 
 after a moment's insulting radiance, it 'a ruthlessly
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 10} 
 
 ■wallowed up, — but a steady fire, which darts forth 
 tongues of flame. It is no sparkling epigram of ac- 
 tion, but a luminous epic of character. It first ap- 
 pears in the mind as a mysterious but potent senti- 
 ment, working below consciousness in the unsounded 
 depths of individual being, and giving the nature it 
 inhabits a slow, sure, upward tendency to the noble 
 and exalted in meditation and action. Growing witli 
 the celestial nutriment on which it feeds, and gaining 
 strength as it grows, it gradually condenses into con- 
 Bcious sentiment. This sentiment then takes the form 
 of intelligence in productive ideas, and the form of 
 organization in heroic character ; so that, at the end, 
 heart, intellect, and will are all kindled in one blaze, 
 all united in one individuality, and all gush out 
 in one purpose. The person thus becomes a living 
 Boul, thinking and acting with the rapidity of one who 
 feels spiritual existence, with the audacity of one who 
 obeys spiritual instincts, and with the intelligence cf 
 one who discerns spiritual laws. There is no break 
 or flaw in the connection between the various parts 
 of his nature, but a vital unity, in which intellect 
 iseems to have the force of will, and will the insight 
 and foresight of intellect. There is no hesitation, no 
 stopping half-way, in the pursuit of his lofty aim, 
 partly because, his elevation being the elevation of
 
 102 HEROIC CHARACTER 
 
 nature, he is not perched on a dizzy peak of thought, 
 hut is established on a table-land of character, and 
 partly because there plays round the object he seek* 
 a light and radiance of such strange, unearthly lustre, 
 that his heart, smitten with love for its awful beauty. 
 is drawn toward it by an irresistible fascination. 
 Disappointment, discouragement, obstacles, drudgery, 
 only sting his energies by opposition or are glorified 
 to his imagination as steps ; for beyond them and 
 through them is the Celestial City of his hopes, 
 ghining clear to the inner eye of his mind, tempting, 
 enticing, urging him on through all impediments, by 
 the sweet, attractive force of its visionary charm ! 
 The eyes of such men, by the testimony of painters, 
 always have the expression of looking into distant 
 space. As a result of this unwearied spiritual energy 
 and this ecstatic spiritual vision is the courage of the 
 hero. He has no fear of death, because the idea of 
 death is lost in his intense consciousness of life, — 
 full, rich, exulting, joyous, lyrical life, — which ever 
 asserts the immortality of mind, because it feels it- 
 self immortal, and is scornfully indifferent to that 
 drowsy twilight of intellect into which atheism sen da 
 its unsubstantial spectres, and in which the whole flock 
 of fears, terrors, despairs, weaknesses, and doubts 
 •catter their enfeebling maxims of misanthropy, and
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 103 
 
 Insinuate their ghastly temptations to suicide. One 
 ray from a sunlike soul drives them gibbering back 
 to their parent darkness ; for 
 
 M Whatever crazy sorrow saith, 
 No life that breathes with human breath 
 Hath ever truly wished for death. 
 
 4 "T is life of which our nerves are scant, 
 life, — not death, — for which we pant. 
 More life, and fuller, that we want ! " 
 
 This life of the soul, which is both light and heat, 
 intelligence and power, — this swift-ascending instinct 
 of the spirit to spiritual ideas and laws, — this bold 
 comtu'ttal of self to something it values more than 
 all the interests of self, — attests the presence of the 
 heroic element by indicating an ideal standard of 
 conduct. Let us now contemplate it in the scale of 
 moral precedence, according as it fastens its upward 
 glance on the idea of glory, or country, or humanity, 
 or heaven. This will lead to a short consideration 
 of the hero as a soldier, as a patriot, as a reformer 
 and as a saint. 
 
 In viewing the hero as a soldier, it must be re- 
 membered that the first great difficulty in human 
 life is to rouse men from the abject dominion of 
 lelfishness, laziness, sensuality, fear, and other forms 
 tf physical existen ;e but spiritual death. Fear ii
 
 104 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 the paralysis of the soul ; and nature, preferring an- 
 archy to imbecility lets loose the aggressive passions 
 to shake it off. Hence war, which is a rude protest 
 of manhood against combining order with slavery, and 
 repose with degradation. As long as it is a passion, 
 it merely illustrates nature's favorite game of fighting 
 one vice with another ; but in noble natures the pas- 
 sion becomes consecrated by the heart and imagina- 
 tion, acknowledges an ideal aim, and, under the 
 inspiration of the sentiment of honor, inflames the 
 whole man with a love of the dazzling idea of glory. 
 It is this heroic element in war which palliates its 
 enormities, humanizes its horrors, and proves the 
 combatants to be men, and not tigers and wolves. 
 Its grand illusions — fopperies to the philosopher and 
 vices to the moralist — are realities to the hero. 
 Glory feeds his heart's hunger for immortality, gives 
 him a beautiful disdain of fear, puts ecstasy into his 
 courage and claps wings to his aspirations, and makes 
 the grim battle-field, with its crash of opposing hosts 
 and the deafening din of its engines of death, as 
 Bweet to him 
 
 " As ditties highly penned, 
 Sung by a fair queen in a summer's bower, 
 Wi'± ravishing division, to her lute." 
 
 This splendid fanaticism, while it has infected suck
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 105 
 
 fije and pure spirits as Bayard and Sir Philip Sid- 
 ney, and thus allied itself with exalted virtues, haa 
 not altogether denied its hallowing light to men 
 stained with Satanic vices. In Hannibal, in Caesar, 
 in Wallenstein, in Napoleon, in all commanders of 
 gigantic abilities as well as heroic sentiments, and 
 whose designs stretch over an extended field of op- 
 erations, the idea of glory dilates to the vastness of 
 their desires, and is pursued with a ruthle.-sness of 
 intellect which, unchecked by moral principle, is in- 
 different to all considerations of truth and humanity 
 which block the way to success. The ravenous hun- 
 ger for universal dominion which characterizes such 
 colossal spirits, though criminal, is still essentially 
 ideal, and takes hold of what is immortal in evil. 
 Such men are the unhallowed poets and artists of 
 action, fiercely impatient to shape the world into the 
 form of their imperious conceptions, — like the usurp- 
 ing god of the old Greek mythology, who devoured 
 all existing natures, and swallowed all the pre-exist- 
 ing elements of things, and then produced the world 
 anew after the pattern of his own tyrannous ideas. 
 But their crimes partake of the greatness of their 
 characters, and cannot be imitated by malefactors of 
 a lower grade. 
 
 The courage of the devotee of glorj has in it as 
 t*
 
 106 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 element of rapture which resembles the fine frenzj 
 of the poet. The hero, indeed, has such prodigious 
 energy and fulness of soul, possesses so quick, keen, 
 and burning a sense of life, that when great perils 
 call for almost superhuman efforts, he exhibits flashes 
 of valor which transcend all bodily limitations ; for he 
 feels, in the fury and delirium of imaginative ecstasy, 
 as if his body were all ensouled, and, though riddled 
 with bullets, would not consent to death. It was 
 this sense which made Cajsar rush singly on the 
 Spanish ranks, and carried Napoleon across the 
 Bridge of Lodi. " I saw him," says Demosthenes, in 
 speaking of Philip of Macedon, " though covered with 
 wounds, his eye struck out, his collar-bone broke, 
 maimed, both in his hands and feet, still resolutely 
 rush into the midst of dangers, and ready to deliver 
 up to Fortune any part of his body she might desire, 
 provided he might live honorably and gloriously with 
 the rest." It was this sense also that forced out of 
 the cold heart of Robespierre the only heroic utter 
 ance of his life. In his lust struggle in the Conven- 
 tion, surrounded by enemies eager for his blood, and 
 his endeavors to speak in his own defence drowned 
 by the clamors of the assembly, desperation infused 
 eloquence even into him, and he cried out, in a voice 
 heard above everything else, " President of Assassins 
 bear me ! '
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 107 
 
 The hero, also, when his inspiration is a thought, 
 has a kind of faith that the blind messengers of 
 death hurtling round bira will respect him who rep- 
 resents in his person the majesty of an idea. " The 
 ball that is to hit me," said Napoleon, " has not yet 
 been cast " ; and this confidence of great generals in 
 a tacit understanding between them and the bullets 
 was quaintly expressed by the brave Dessaix in the 
 presentiment of death which came over him on the 
 morning of the battle of Marengo. "It is a long 
 time," he said to one of his aides-de-camp, " since 1 
 have fought in Europe. The bullets won't know me 
 again. Something will happen." 
 
 The audacity and energy of the hero likewise 
 stimulate his intelligence, brightening and condensing 
 rather than confusing his mind. The alertness, saga- 
 city, and coolness of his thinking are never more ap- 
 parent than in the frenzy of conflict. At the terrible 
 naval battle of the Baltic, Nelson, after the engage- 
 ment had lasted four hours, found that an armistice 
 was necessary to save his fleet from destruction, and, 
 in the heat and din of the cannonade, wrote a letter 
 to the Crown Prince of Dermark proposing one. 
 Not a minute was to be lost, and an officer hastily 
 handed him a wafer to seal it. Bu* Nelson called 
 for a candle and deliberately sealed it in wax,
 
 108 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 * This is no time," he said, " to appear hurried and 
 informal." Gonsalvo, the great captain, in one of his 
 Italian battles, had his powder magazine blown up 
 by the enemy's first discharge. His soldiers, smitten 
 by sudden panic, paused and turned, but he instantly 
 rallied them with the exclamation, " My brave boys, 
 the victory is ours ! Heaven tells us by this signal 
 that we shall have no further need of our artillery." 
 Napoleon was famous for combining daring with 
 Bhrewdness, and was politic even in his fits of rage. 
 In desperate circumstances he put on an air of reck- 
 less confidence, which cowed the spirits of his adver- 
 saries, and almost made them disbelieve the evidence 
 of their senses. Thus he induced the Austrian am- 
 bassador to commit the folly of signing the treaty of 
 Campo Formio, by a furious threat of instant war, 
 which, if declared at that time, would probably have 
 resulted to Austria's advantage. Seizing a precious 
 vase of porcelain, a gift to the ambassador from the 
 Empress Catherine, he exclaimed passionately, " The 
 die is then cast ; the truce broken ; war declared. 
 But mark my words ! before the end of autumn I will 
 break in 'pieces your monarchy as I now destroy this 
 porcelain " ; and, dashing it into fragments, he bowed 
 |n<l retired. The treaty was signed the next day. 
 But perhaps the grandest example in modern hi*
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 109 
 
 tory of that audacity which combines all the physical, 
 tivie, and mental elements of courage is found in 
 Napoleon's return from Elba, and triumphant pro- 
 gress to Paris. The world then beheld the whole 
 organization of a monarchy melt away like a piece 
 of frost-work in the sun, before a person and a name. 
 Every incident in that march is an epical stroke. 
 He throws himself unhesitatingly on the Napoleon 
 in every man and mass of men he meets, and Napo- 
 leonism instinctively recognizes and obeys its master. 
 On approaching the regiment at Grenoble, the officers 
 in command gave the order to fire. Advancing con- 
 fidently, within ten steps of the levelled muskets, 
 and baring his breast, he uttered the well-known 
 words, •' Soldiers of the Fifth Regiment, if there is 
 one among you who would kill his Emperor, let him 
 do it ! here I am ! " The whole march was worthy 
 such a commencement, profound as intelligence, irre- 
 sistible as destiny. 
 
 But the test of ascension in heroism is not found 
 in faculty, but in the sentiment which directs the 
 faculty; the love of glory, therefore, must yield the 
 palm in disinterestedness of sentiment to the love of 
 country, and the hero as a patriot take precedence 
 5>f the hero as a soldier. 
 
 The great conservative instinct of patriotism is io
 
 110 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 all vigorous communities, and under its impulse 
 whole nations sometimes become heroic. Even its 
 prejudices are elements of spiritual strength, and 
 most of the philosophic chatterers who pretend to be 
 above them are, in reality, below them. Thus the 
 old Hollander, who piously attempted to prove that 
 Dutch was the language spoken by Adam in Para- 
 dise, and the poor Ethiopians, who believed that God 
 made their sands and deserts in person, and contempt- 
 uously left the rest of the world to be manufactured 
 by his angels, were in a more hopeful condition 
 of manhood than is the cosmopolitan coxcomb, who, 
 from the elevation of a mustache and the comprehen- 
 siveness of an imperial, lisps elegant disdain of all 
 narrow national peculiarities. The great drawback 
 on half the liberality of the world is its too fre- 
 quent connection with indifference or feebleness. 
 When we apply to men the tests of character, we 
 often find that the amiable gentleman, who is so 
 blandly superior to the prejudices of sect and coun- 
 try, and who clasps the whole world in the mild 
 embrace of his commonplaces, becomes a furious bigot 
 when the subject-matter rises to the importance of 
 one-and-sixpence, and the practical question is wheth- 
 er "he or you shall pay it. The revenge of the little 
 V »oul and the w°ak in will is to apply to the strong
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. Ill 
 
 in character the tests of criticism ; and then your un- 
 mistakable do-nothing can prattle prettily in the pa- 
 tois of the giants, and, with a few abstract maxims, 
 that any boy can grasp, will smirkingly exhibit to 
 you the limitations in thought of such poor creatures 
 bs Miltiades, Leonidas, Fabius, Scipio, of Wallace, 
 Bruce, Tell, Hofer, of Joan of Arc, Henry IV., 
 Turgot, Lafayette, of De Witt and William of Or 
 ange, of Grattan, Curran, and Emmett, of Pym, 
 Hampden, Russell, Sidney, Marvell, of Washington, 
 Adams, Henry, Hamilton, and all the rest of the 
 heroes of patriotism. The idea these men represent 
 may, doubtless, be easily translated into a truism, and 
 this truism be easily overtopped by some truism more 
 general ; but their faith, fortitude, self-devotion, their 
 impassioned, all-absorbing love of country, are, unhap- 
 pily, in the nature of paradoxes. 
 
 Patriotism, indeed, when it rises to the heroic 
 standard, is a positive love of country, and it will do 
 all and sacrifice all which it is in the nature of love 
 U) do and to sacrifice for its object. It is heroic on- 
 ly when it is lifted to the elevation of the ideal. — 
 when it is so hallowed by the affections and glorified 
 by the imagination that the whole being of the man 
 is thrilled and moved by its inspiration, and drudgery 
 Deeomes beautiful, and suffering noble, and death
 
 112 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 gweet, in the country's service. No mere intelligent 
 regard for a nation's material interests, or pride in 
 its extended dominion, is sufficient to constitute a 
 patriot hero. It is the sentiment and the idea of 
 the country, "felt in his blood and felt along his 
 heart " ; it is this which withdraws him from self, and 
 identifies him with the nation ; which enlarges his 
 personality to the grandeur and greatness of the na- 
 tional personality ; which makes national thoughts and 
 national passions beat and burn in his own heart and 
 brain, until at last he feels every wrong done to his 
 country as a personal wrong, and every wrong com- 
 mitted by his country as a sin for which he is per- 
 sonally responsible. Such men are nations individ- 
 ualized. They establish magnetic relations with what 
 is latent in all classes, command all the signs of that 
 subtle freemasonry which brings men into instant 
 communion with the people, and are ever impatient 
 and dangerous forces in a nation until they reach 
 their rightful, predestined position at its head. " As 
 in nature," says Bacon, " things move more violent- 
 ly to their place and calmly in their place, so vir- 
 tue in ambition is violent, in authority settled and 
 calm." As long as Chatham is out of office, Eng- 
 land must be torn with factions, in his furious endeav 
 t>re to upset the pretenders to statesmanship who
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 113 
 
 •coudv the official station* ; but, the moment he is 
 minister, the nation comes to self-consciousness in 
 him, and acts with the promptitude, energy, and unity 
 of a great power. Though his body was shattered 
 and worn with illness, his spirit — the true spirit of 
 the nation — was felt at once in every department 
 of the public service ; timidity, hesitation, intrigue, 
 mediocrity, disappeared before his audacious intelli- 
 gence ; and India, America, the continent of Europe, 
 soon felt the full force of the latent energies of the na- 
 tional soul. The word impossible was hateful to Chat- 
 ham, as it is to all vigorous natures who recognize 
 the latent, the reserved power, in men and nations. 
 u Never let me hear that foolish word again," said 
 Mirabeau. " Impossible ! — it is not good French," 
 said Napoleon. My Lord Anson, at the Admiralty, 
 Bends word to Chatham, then confined to his chamber 
 by one of his most violent attacks of the gout, that 
 it is impossible for him to fit out a naval expedition 
 within tin; period to which he is limited. " Impossi- 
 ble '"cried Chatham, glaring a 1 the messenger; "who 
 talks to me of impossibilities?" Then starting to 
 his feet, and forcing out great drops of agony on his 
 brow with the excruciating torment of the effort, he 
 pxclaimed, "Tell Lord Anson that he serves under a 
 ttlinister who treads on impossibilities!" One of hiu
 
 114 HEfcOlC CHARACTER. 
 
 contemporaries calls all this ranting. " Lord Clmt« 
 ham's rants," he says, " are amazing." But a states- 
 man who indulged in such fine rants as Quebec and 
 Minden, who ranted France out of Germany, Amer- 
 ica, and India, and ranted England into a power 
 of the first class, is a ranter infinitely to be pre- 
 ferred to those cool and tasteful politicians who ruin 
 the countries they govern with so much decorous 
 duncery and grave and dignified feebleness. 
 
 Patriotism, to the patriot hero, does not consist in 
 aiding the government of his country in every basfc 
 or stupid act it may perform, but rather in paralyz- 
 ing its power when it violates vested rights, affronts 
 instituted justice, and assumes undelegated authority. 
 Accordingly, Chatham, the type of the patriot, but 
 •vhose patriotism comprehended the whole British 
 empire, put forth the full force and frenzy of his 
 £ mius and passions against the administrations who 
 taxed America ; gloried, as an English patriot, in the 
 armed resistance of the Colonies ; gave them the ma- 
 terial aid and comfort ( t his splendid fame and over- 
 whelming eloquence ; became, in the opinion of all 
 little-minded patriots, among whom was King George 
 the Third himself, a trumpet of sedition, an enemy 
 to his country ; and, with the grand audacity of hi» 
 character, organized an opposition, so strong in rea-
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. llo 
 
 »oi» and moral power, and so uncompromising in its 
 attitude, that it at least enfeebled the efforts of the gov- 
 ernments it could not overturn, and made Lord North 
 more than once humorously execrate the memory of 
 Columbus for discovering a continent which gave him 
 and his ministry so much trouble. Fox and Burke, 
 as well as Chatham, viewed the Americans as Eng- 
 lish subjects struggling for English legal privileges; 
 they would not admit, even after the Colonists had 
 revolted, that they were rebels ; and Lord North was 
 near the truth, when, interrupted by Fox for using the 
 offensive word, he mockingly corrected himself, and 
 with an arch look at the Whig benches, called the 
 American army and generals, not rebels, but " gentle- 
 men of the Opposition over the water." In after years, 
 when Fox and Burke had quarrelled, Fox, referring, 
 in the House of Commons, to old memories of their 
 political friendship, alluded to the time when they had 
 mutually wept over the fall of Montgomery, and mu- 
 tually rejoiced over a victory by Washington ; and 
 one of the noblest passages in literature is the mem- 
 orable sentence with which Burke concludes his 
 address to the electors of Bristol, in defence of his con- 
 duct in regard to the American war and the govern- 
 ment of Ireland. It just indicates that delicate line 
 nhizh separates, in great and generous natures, the
 
 116 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 highest love or country from the still higher lov° ot 
 mankind. "The charges against me," he says, "are 
 all of one kind, — that I have carried the principles 
 of general justice and benevolence too far, — further 
 than a cautious policy would warrant, — further than 
 the opinions of many could go along with me. In 
 every accident which may happen to me through life, 
 in pain, in sorrow, in depression, in distress, — I wil! 
 call to mind this accusation, and be comforted." 
 
 It is a great advance, morally and mentally, when 
 a man's heart and brain reach out beyond the sphere 
 of his personal interests to comprehend the nation to 
 which he belongs ; but there are men whose ascending 
 and widening natures refuse to be limited even by the 
 sentiment and idea of country, whose raised conceptions 
 grasp the beauty of beneficence, the grandeur of truth, 
 the majesty of right, and who, in the service of these 
 commanding ideas, are ready to suffer all, in the 
 spirit of that patience which St. Pierre finely calls 
 he " courage of virtue," and to dare all, in the spirit 
 c r that self-devotion which is certainly the virtue of 
 courage. This class includes all reformers in society, 
 in government, in philosophy, in religion, whose po 
 sition calls for heroic acts, resolutions, sacrifices, — 
 for manhood as well as for mental power. Thus 
 Milton, whose whole nature was cast in an heroic
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 117 
 
 mould, who felt himself not merely the countryman 
 of Shakespeare and Cromwell, but of Homer and 
 Sophocles, of Dante and Tasso, of Luther and Me- 
 lancthon, — of all men who acknowledge the sway of 
 the beautiful, the noble, and the right, — could not, 
 of course, write anything which was not dictated by 
 an heroic spirit; all his sentences, therefore, have the 
 animating and penetrating, as well as illuminating 
 power of heroic acts, and always imply a character 
 strong enough to make good his words. Still, in 
 some respects, we may doubt whether the mere 
 writing his " Defence of the People of England," rises 
 to the dignity of heroism ; but, when his physician 
 told him that if he did write it he would lose his 
 eyesight, his calm persistence in his work was sub- 
 limely heroic. Freedom demanded of the student his 
 most precious sense, and he resolutely plucked out 
 his eyes, and laid them on her altar, content to abide 
 in outward night, provided with the inner eye of the 
 soul he could see the stern countenance of inexora- 
 ble Duty melt into that approving smile which re- 
 wards self-sacrifice with a bliss deeper than all joys 
 >f sense or raptures of imagination. 
 
 There are occasions, also, where mere intellectual 
 hardihood may be in the highest degree heroic That 
 peculiar nwal fear which is involved in intellectual
 
 118 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 timidity is often harder to overcome than the physi- 
 cal fear of the stake and the rack. There are men 
 who will dare death for glory or for country, who 
 could not dare scorn or contumely for the truth ; and 
 people generally would rather die than think. Noth- 
 ing but that enrapturing sentiment and vivid vision 
 implied in the love of truth, nothing but that trans- 
 porting thrill which imparadises the soul in the per- 
 ception of a new thought, can lift a wise and good 
 man above the wholesome prejudices of prudence, 
 custom, country, and common belief, and make him 
 let loose the immortal idea his mind imprisons, and 
 send it forth to war against false systems and te- 
 nacious errors, with the firm faith that it will result 
 in eventual good, though at first it seems to trail 
 along with it the pernicious consequences of a lie. 
 Such a man feels the awful responsibility laid upon 
 that soul into whose consciousness descends one of 
 those revolutionizing truths, 
 
 " Hard to shape in act : 
 For all the past of time reveals 
 A bridal dawn of thunder-peals. 
 Wherever thought has wedded fact." 
 
 Thus heroic resolution, as well as wide-reaching 
 thought, is often indispensable to the philosophic 
 thinker ; but when to the deep love of truth is added
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. Hi* 
 
 the deeper love of right, and the thinker standi 
 boldly forth as a practical reformer, the obstacles, 
 internal and external, to brave and determined effort 
 are multiplied both to his conscience and his will. 
 A prophet of the future, with his eager eyes fixe4 
 on hope, — 
 
 " The burning eagle, 
 Above the unrisen morrow," — 
 
 he has to labor in the present on men whose inspi- 
 ration is memory. The creative and beneficent char- 
 acter of his aggressive thought is at first concealed 
 by its destructive aspect. His light seems lightning, 
 which irradiates not to bless, but to smite. As regards 
 his own life and comfort, he may be ready, in every 
 exigency, to say, with the hero of Italy, " I had 
 rather take one step forward and die, than one step 
 backward and live " ; but he often has also to resist 
 the tormenting thought that he is sacrificing himself 
 only to injure others, and is preparing to go triumph- 
 antly through the earthly hell of the martyr's stake, 
 only to pass into that hotter hell which is paved with 
 good intentions. A universal yell denounces him aa 
 the apostle of anarchy, falsehood, and irreligion ; and 
 nothing but the faith which discerns and takes hohi 
 of the immortal substance of truth can enable him. 
 not only to withstand this shock of adverse opinior
 
 120 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 but to deal his prodigious blows with the condensed 
 energy of unhesitating, unweakened will. This is true 
 strength and fortitude of soul, reposing grandly on 
 unseen realities above it, and obstinately resisting the 
 evidence of the shifting facts which appear to cast 
 doubt on the permanent law. It is probable that 
 Wickliffe, Huss, Luther, all heroic men who have 
 brought down fire from heaven, the light and the 
 heat of truth, had, in moments of despondency, a sly 
 and sneering devil at their elbow, mocking them with 
 the taunt by which the scoffing messenger of Jove 
 adds keener agony to the sufferings of the chained 
 Prometheus : — 
 
 " Those who do endure 
 Dsep wrongs for man, and scorn, and chains, but heap 
 Thousand-fo'd torment on themselves and him." 
 
 In these remarks, so far, we have laid stress on 
 the principle that the inspiration of the hero is the 
 positive quality of love, not the negative quality of 
 hatred. ror example, Carlyle, always writing of 
 heroism, is rarely heroic, because he hates falsehood 
 rather than loves truth, and is a disorganizer of 
 wrong rather than an organizer of right. His writ- 
 ings tend to split the mind into a kind of splendid 
 disorder, and we purchase some shining fragments of 
 ihought at the expense of weakened will. Being
 
 REROIC CHARACTER. 121 
 
 negative, he cannot communicate life and inspiration 
 to others ; for negation ends in despair, and love alone 
 can communicate the life of hope. His negative 
 thought, therefore, can never become a positive thing ; 
 it can pout, sneer, gibe, growl, hate, declaim, destroy ; 
 but it cannot cheer, it cannot create. Now men may 
 be soldiers, patriots, and reformers, from the inspira- 
 tion of hatred ; but they cannot be heroic. It is love, 
 and love alone, whose sweet might liberates men 
 from the thraldom of personal considerations, and 
 lifts them into the exhilarating region of unselfish 
 activity. It is not the fear of shame, but love of 
 glory, which makes the purely heroic soldier. It is 
 not hatred of other nations, but love of his own, 
 which makes the heroic patriot. It is not hatred of 
 falsehood and wrong, but love of truth and right, 
 which makes the heroic thinker and reformer. And 
 it is not the fear of hell and hatred of the Devil, but 
 the love of heaven, which makes the heroic saint. 
 All the hatred, all the fear, are incidental and acci- 
 dental, not central and positive. We should hardly 
 style old King Clovis a saint on the strength of the 
 passion he flew into when the account of the Crucifix ■ 
 ion was read to him, and of his fierce exclamation, 
 u I would I had been there with my valiant Franks ! 
 
 I would have repressed his wrongs ! " 
 «
 
 122 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 The heroism of the saint, the last to be considered 
 here, exceeds all other heroism in depth, intensity, 
 comprehensiveness, elevation, and wisdom. The hero 
 soldier, the hero patriot, the hero reformer, each is 
 groat by detaching one idea from the sum of things, 
 and throwing his whole energies into its realization ; 
 but the hero saint views all things in relation to 
 their centre and source. He brings in the idea of 
 God, and at once the highest earthly objects swiftly 
 recede to their proper distance, and dwindle to their 
 real dimensions. But this heroism, though it exhibits 
 human nature reposing on an all-inclusive idea, the 
 mightiest that the heart can conceive or the mind 
 dimly grope for on the vanishing edges of intelligence, 
 is still not a heroism eagerly coveted or warmly ap 
 proved. It is recorded of Saint Theresa, that, after 
 she had become old and poor in the service of the 
 Lord, and Vivid only two sous left of all her posses- 
 sions, she sat down to meditate. " Theresa and two 
 sous," she said, " are nothing ; but Theresa, two sous, 
 and God, are all things " ; on which Pierre Leroux 
 makes the bitter comment : " To the young bucks of 
 Pans, Theresa, young and handsome, and worth buf 
 two sous, would be little ; and Theresa, two sous, and 
 Sod, would be still less ! " 
 
 The mental phenomena implied in the acta, or r»
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER 123 
 
 forded in the writings, of the heroes of religion are 
 Df so grand and transcendent a character that one 
 can hardly have patience with Mr. Worldly Wise- 
 man, — the worthy gentleman who writes history and 
 explains the problems of metaphysics, — when, with 
 his knowing look, he disposes of the whole matter by 
 Borne trash about fanaticism and disordered imagina- 
 tion. Now glory, country, humanity, are realities 
 only to those who love them ; and the all-compre- 
 hending Reality the saint seeks and adores, is but a 
 faint star, 
 
 " Pinnacled dim in the intense mane," 
 
 to the wisest of the worldlings. By what right does 
 he sit in critical judgment on the saints and martyrs, 
 when his point of view is earth, and their point of 
 view is heaven ? Religious heroism, indeed, in its 
 gradual growth from religious sentiment, is a feeling 
 before it is an idea ; but what the heart wishes the 
 mind soon discerns ; and the marvellous experiences 
 which visit the consciousness of the saint are logical 
 results of the gravitation of his nature to its source, 
 and are as valid as other facts of immediate per- 
 ception. Once roused, this divinizing sentiment kin- 
 dles the whole solid mass of his being with its 
 penetrating and purifying fire ; carries his thoughts, 
 affections, passions, to higher levels of character;
 
 L24 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 converts faith into sight, so that at last the mys- 
 teries of the supernatural world are partially unrolled 
 to his eager gaze ; he catches glimpses of gloriea 
 almost too bright for the aching sense to bear ; dis- 
 cerns right, truth, beneficence, justice, as radiations 
 from one awful loveliness ; and sees 
 
 " Around His throre the sanctities of heaven 
 Stand thick as stars ; and from His sight receive 
 Beatitude past utterance." 
 
 Filled and stirred with these wondrous visions, 
 
 " Which o'erinform his tenement of clay," 
 
 he becomes a soldier of the chivalry of spirit, a pa- 
 triot of the heavenly kingdom, — the true " pilgrim 
 of eternity," burdened beneath the weight of his 
 rapture until it finds expression in those electric 
 deeds whose shock is felt all over the earth, amazing 
 Time itself with a thrill from Eternity. The still, 
 deep ecstasy which imparadises his spirit can but 
 imperfectly ally itself with human language, though 
 it occasionally escapes along his written page in fit- 
 ful gleams of celestial lightning, touching such words 
 as "joy," and "sweetness," and "rest," with an un- 
 earthly significance, a preternatural intensity of mean- 
 ing; but the full power of this awful beauty ot 
 holiness is only seen and felt in the virtues it creates
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER. 125 
 
 tn the felicity with which it transmutes calamities 
 into occasions for the exercise of new graces of char- 
 acter; in the sureness of its glance into the occult se- 
 crets of life ; in the solid patience which exhausts all 
 the ingenuity of persecution ; in the intrepid meekness 
 which is victorious over the despotic might of unhal- 
 lowed force ; in the serene audacity which dares all 
 the principalities of earth, and defies all the powers 
 of hell ; in the triumphant Faith which hears the 
 choral chant amidst the torments of the rack, and 
 sees the cherubic faces through the glare of the fires 
 of martyrdom ! 
 
 But perhaps there is nothing more exquisitely 
 simple and touching in the experience of the hero 
 of religion, nothing which more startles us by its 
 confident faith, than the feeling which animates his 
 colloquies and meditations when the spiritual home- 
 sickness, the pang of what Coleridge calls the senti- 
 ment of " other worldliness," presses on his soul, and 
 he confesses to the weakness of desiring to depart. 
 Thus figure to yourselves Luther, as he is revealed 
 to us in his old age, sitting by the rude table in his 
 humble house, and, with a few dear veterans of the 
 Reformation, gossiping over the mugs of ale on the 
 affairs of the celestial kingdom, while the thunders 
 if papal and imperial wrath are heard muttering
 
 126 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 ominously in the distance. Luther tells them that 
 he begins to feel the longing to leave their camp on 
 earth, and to go home. He is not without hope 
 that the Lord, in view of his protracted strugpVa 
 and declining energies, will soon recall him. He is 
 resigned, not to die, but to live, if such be the order 
 from head-quarters ; but if it be not presumptuous in 
 him to proffer a petition, he could wish it to be 
 considered that he had sojourned here long enough, 
 and should have permission to depart, it mattering 
 little to him whether the medium of transfer from 
 >ne world to another be the bed of sickness or the 
 Martyr's stake. At any rate, however, age is doing 
 Its sure work even on his stalwart frame ; and he 
 closes with the consoling sentiment so finely embod- 
 ied by the Christian poet : 
 
 " Within this body pent. 
 
 Absent from Thee I roam : 
 But nightly pitch my moving tent 
 A day's march nearer home." 
 
 We have thus attempted to picture, with a few 
 rude scrawls of the pencil, the heroic spirit, as its 
 creative glow successively animates the soldier, the 
 patriot, the reformer, and the saint, painfully con- 
 Bcious all the while that we have not sounded its 
 depth of sentiment, nor measured its height of char
 
 HEROIC CHARACTER 127 
 
 icter, nor told its fulness of joy. We have seen that 
 this spirit is a spirit of cheer, and live, and beauty, 
 and power, giving the human soul its finest and 
 amplest expression ; and that, while its glorious in- 
 spiration illuminates history with the splendors of 
 romance, it is the prolific source, in humble life, of 
 heroic deeds which no history records, no poetry cel- 
 ebrates, and of which renown is mute. This spirit is 
 everywhere, and it is needed everywhere. It is 
 oeeded *"> resist low views of business, low views of 
 polities, low views of patriotism, low views of life. 
 ft is needed in every situation where passion tempts, 
 sloth enfeebles, fear degrades, power threatens, and 
 interest deludes. And it is not without its band of 
 witnesses to sound their everlasting protest against 
 meanness, cowardice, baseness, and fraud, and tc 
 shield in their sustaining arms, and invigorate by 
 their immortal presence, the sorely-tempted novices 
 of heroic honor and virtue. They rise before the 
 soul's eye, a glorious company of immortals, from the 
 battle-fields of unselfish fame ; they come from the 
 alls where patriotism thundered its ardent resolves, 
 and from the scaffolds which its self-devotion trans- 
 figured into sacrificial altars; they issue from the 
 hissing crowd of scorners and bigots through which 
 the lon« Reformer urged his victorious way ; and thej
 
 128 HEROIC CHARACTER. 
 
 come from that promised heaven on earth, beami ; 
 from the halo which encircles the head and beatill ^s 
 the countenance of the saint, smiling celestial disdain 
 of torture and death. From all these they come, — 
 they press upon the consciousness, — not as dea«J 
 memories of the past, but as living forces of tlu, 
 present, to stream into our spirits the resistless «u 
 9rgies which gladden theirs : — 
 
 " Filling the soul with sentiments august ; 
 'Xh» beautiful, the orave the holy, and th* jftflfc
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 IN studying literature and history, we are at first 
 attracted by particular events and individual minds, 
 and we rise but gradually to the conception of nations 
 and national minds, including, of course, under the 
 latter phrase, all the great moving, vital powers ex- 
 pressed in the phenomena of a nation's life. The 
 external history, the political institutions, the litera- 
 ture, laws, and manners of a people, are but its 
 thoughts in visible or audible expression, and ever 
 carry us back to the Mind whence they proceeded, 
 and from which they received their peculiar national 
 character. We cannot form just notions even of in- 
 dividuals without viewing them as related to their 
 age and country, as expressions, more or less emphatic, 
 of the National Mind, in whose depths their personal 
 being had its birth, and from whose vitality they 
 drew the pith and nerve of character. Thus Pericles, 
 Scipio, and Chatham lose much of their raciness and 
 genuineness if not considered as related in this waj 
 6» I
 
 130 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 lo Greece, Rome, and England, who bore them, nur- 
 tured them, colored and directed their thoughts and 
 passions, clothed them with power as with a garment; 
 bo that Greece saw in Pericles the mirror of her own 
 Bupple strength and plastic intellect ; and Rome be- 
 held in Scipio the image of her own tixed will and 
 large reason ; and England recognized in Chatham's 
 <wift Norman energy and solid Saxon sense the child 
 who had drained honesty, intelligence, and imperious 
 pride from her own arrogant breast. It thus requires 
 t greai people to bear a brood of great men ; for 
 great men require strong incitements ; a field for ac- 
 tion ; courage, power, glory, and virtue around as 
 well as within tnem ; and if powerful natures do not 
 itart naturally up, to meet any terrible emergency of 
 a nation's life, we may be sure that the National 
 Mind has become weak and corrupt, has " lost the 
 breed of noble bloods," and that external enemies, 
 like empirics dealing with consumptive patients, only 
 accelerate a death already doomed by interioi de- 
 lay. 
 
 Thus, when we would comprehend in one inclusive 
 term the intellect and individuality of Greece, or 
 Rome, or England, we speak of the Greek, or Ro- 
 man, or English mind. A national mind implies a 
 aatiou, not a mere aggregation of individuals oi
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 131 
 
 itates ; and we propose now to consider the question, 
 Whether or not there is such a thing as an Amer- 
 ican Mind ; and if so, what are its characteristics 
 and tendencies; what is the inspiration, and what 
 the direction it gives to the individual man in 
 America? 
 
 In treating this subject, it is important that we 
 avoid all that blatant and bragging tone in which 
 American conceit thinly veils its self-distrust ; that 
 a deaf ear be presented to the exulting dissonance 
 of the American chanticleer ; that the Pilgrim Fathers 
 be disturbed as little as possible in their well-earned 
 graves ; and that the different parts of the discourse 
 be not found, like the compositions of certain em- 
 inent musicians, to be but symphonious variations 
 on the one tune of " Yankee Doodle," or " Hail 
 Columbia." 
 
 And, first, in view of the varieties of races and in- 
 terests included under our government, can we assert 
 the existence of an American Mind ? We certainly 
 cannot do this in the sense in which we say there 
 was a Greek mind, whose birth, growth, maturity, and 
 decay we can take in at one grasp of generalization ; 
 or in the sense in whicn we say there is an English 
 mind, full-grown and thoroughly organized in man- 
 Mrs, institutions, and literature. All *.hat we can a»
 
 132 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 iert is, that the thoughts, acts, and characteis of 
 Plvmouth Puritan and Virginia Cavalier, through 
 two centuries of active existence, have been fused 
 into a mass of national thought, character, and life ; 
 and that this national life has sufficient energy and 
 pliancy to assimilate the foreign natures incessantly 
 pouring into it, and to grow, through this process of 
 assimilation, into a comprehensive national mind. At 
 present we can discern little more than tendencies, 
 and the clash and conflict of the various elements ; 
 but the strongest force — the force to which the oth- 
 er elements gravitate, and by which they will all 
 eventually be absorbed — is the Saxon-English ele- 
 ment in its modified American form. The Celt, the 
 German, the Englishman, the Dane, can exist here 
 only by parting with his national individuality; for 
 he is placed in a current of influences which inevi- 
 tably melts him down into the mass of American life. 
 But, while this absorption changes his character, it 
 modifies also the character of the absorbing force ; 
 for the American Mind, with every infusion of for- 
 eign mind, adds to its being an element which does 
 not lie as a mere novelty on its surface, but pene- 
 trates into its flexible and fluid substance, mixes with 
 its vital blood, and enriches or impoverishes, elevate* 
 »r depraves, its inmost nature ; and so organic in it*
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 133 
 
 lhaiacter is this seeming abstraction jf a nation, that, 
 for every such infusion of a foreign element, each 
 citizen is either injured or benefited, and finds that 
 he acts and thinks the better or the worse for it 
 The balm or the poison steals mysteriously into him 
 from all surrounding circumstances : from the press, 
 from politics, from trade, from social communion, from 
 the very air he breathes, come the currents of a new 
 life to warm or to chill, to invigorate or deaden, his 
 individual heart and brain. This fact goes under the 
 name of a change in public sentiment; and have we 
 not often witnessed its miracles of apostasy or con- 
 version wrought on men whose characters we fondly 
 thought fixed as fate ? 
 
 The American Mind thus promises to be a com- 
 posite mind, — composite in the sense of assimilation, 
 not of mere aggregation. Its two original elements 
 were the Englishman who came here to found, repair, 
 or increase his estate, and the Englishman who was 
 driven here by political and ecclesiastical oppression. 
 Of these, the stronger of the two is undoubtedly 
 the latter; and the last probe of historical and criti- 
 cal analysis touches him at the nation's centre and 
 heart. This Puritan Englishman was all character : 
 strong in the energy, courage, practical skill and 
 liard persistency of character : with a characteristic
 
 134 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 religion, morality, and temper of mind ; at once the 
 most forcible and the most exclusive man that the 
 seventeenth century produced. Yet from this bigoted, 
 austere, iron-willed, resisting, and persisting Saxon 
 religionist — intolerant of other natures, from the very 
 solidity and lowering might of his own — has sprung 
 the flexible, assimilative, compromising, all-accom 
 plished Yankee, who is neither Puritan nor Cavalier, 
 Englishman, Irishman, Frenchman, nor German, but 
 seems to have a touch of them all, and is ready to 
 receive and absorb them all. A Protean personage, 
 he can accommodate himself to any circumstances, to 
 all forms of society, government, and religion. He 
 is the staid, sensible farmer, merchant, or mechanic 
 of New England, with his restlessness subdued into 
 inveterate industry and power of rigid application ; 
 but he is also Sam Slick in the Provinces, and Nim- 
 rod Wildfire in Kentucky, and Jefferson Brick on 
 the frontier. Through all disguises, and in every 
 clime visited by sin and trade, peep the shrewd 
 twinkle of his knowing eyes and the multiform move- 
 ments of his cunning lingers ! Let him drop down 
 in Siberia or Japan, in England or Italy, in a South 
 era plantation or "Western settlement, and he seems 
 to say, " Gentlemen, behold the smartest man in all 
 creation ! one who will put your brain into his head
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 135 
 
 get at your secret, and beat you in the art of being 
 yourselves ; so please fall into rank, deliver up your 
 purses, acknowledge your born lord and king ! " 
 
 We have not time to discuss here the question, 
 how a national mind, which is distinguished above 
 all others for mental hospitality and general availa- 
 bleness, had its root in a Puritanism as unaccommo- 
 dating as it was powerful. It is, perhaps, sufficient 
 to say, in explanation, that the Puritan, narrow and 
 isolated as he seems, had one side of his nature wide 
 open to liberal influences. His religious creed, it 
 is true, was authoritative ; he submitted to it him- 
 self, he enforced it upon others ; but in political 
 speculation he was audaciously independent. In the 
 art and science of government he had no European 
 equal either among statesmen or philosophers, and his 
 politics, constantly connected as they were with his 
 industrial enterprise, eventually undermined his des- 
 potic theology. But our business here is with the 
 American Mind as it now is, and as it promises to 
 be hereafter. This mind we must consider as having 
 its expression in the nation's life ; and certainly the 
 first survey of it reveals a confusion of qualities 
 which apparently elude analysis and defy geueraliz- 
 Htion. This confusion results, as in the individual 
 Hind, from the variety of unassimilated element* in
 
 136 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 contact or collision with the national personality ; and 
 accordingly its harmony is disturbed by a mob of 
 noisy opinions, which never have, and some of which, 
 we trust, never will, become living ideas and active 
 forces. The consequence of this juxtaposition of 
 mental organization with mental anarchy, in a na 
 tional mind hospitable to everything, and now onh 
 visible to us in its fierce, swift, devouring growth, if. 
 a lack of solidity, depth, and tenacity in comparison 
 with its nimbleness, and a disposition to combine » 
 superficial enthusiasm for theories with a shrewd hold 
 upon things throughout the broad field of its restless, 
 curious, inventive, appropriative, scheming, plausible, 
 glorious, and vainglorious activity. But the two 
 grand leading characteristics of its essential nature 
 are energy and impressibility, — an impressibility all 
 alive to the most various objects, and receptive of 
 elements conflicting with each other, and a primitive, 
 inherent energy, too quick, fiery, and buoyant to be 
 submerged by the wealth of life which its impressi- 
 bility pours into it ; an energy which whelms in its 
 stream all slower and feebler natures with which it 
 comes in contact, and rushes onward with the force 
 of fate and the intelligence of direction. 
 
 In estimating the quantity and quality of this men- 
 tal energy, we must ascertain the different channel*
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 137 
 
 if work and production into which it is poured. 
 Work of some kind is the measure of its power and 
 the test of its quality ; but we must avoid the fallacy 
 of supposing that art and literature are the only ex- 
 pressions of a nation's intellect. It would, indeed, be 
 a grotesque libel on some ten millions of educated 
 people to declare that American literature represented 
 more than a fraction of American intelligence. That 
 intelligence has received a practical direction, and is 
 expressed, not in Iliads and .ZEneids, not in Principias 
 and Cartoons, but in commerce, in manufactures, in the 
 liberal professions, in the mechanic arts, in the arts of 
 government and legislation, in all those fields of labor 
 where man grapples directly with nature, or with so- 
 cial problems which perplex his practical activity. 
 To describe the miracles which American energy has 
 wrought in these departments would be to invade a 
 domain sacred to caucus speeches and all kinds of 
 Btarred-and-striped bravado, and perhaps they speak 
 for themselves with far more emphasis than orators 
 can speak for them, having hieroglyphed, as Carlyle 
 would say, " America, her mark," over a whole con- 
 tinent but it is not generally admitted that mind 
 
 — analytical, assimilative, constructive, creative mtad 
 
 — is as much implied in these practical directions of 
 btellijrence as in abstract sciance and the fine art*
 
 138 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 so that, if a sudden upward ideal turn were given tc 
 the national sentiment, the intellectual energy which 
 would leave contriving railroads, calculating markets, 
 and creating capital, and rush into epics, lyrics, and 
 pastorals, would make Wall Street stare and totter, 
 and our present generation of poets strangle them- 
 selves with their own lines. Indeed, observation, 
 reason, and imagination are powers which do not lose 
 their nature in their application to widely different 
 objects. Thus Sir William Hamilton, the acutest 
 analyst of Aristotle's mental processes, declares that 
 abstruse and seemingly juiceless metaphysician to 
 have had as great an imagination as Homer ; and 
 though we are prone to associate imagination with 
 some elevation of sentiment, Shakespeare has given 
 more of it to Iago, and Goethe has given more of it 
 to Mephistopheles, than Nature gave to Bishop Heber, 
 the purest of England's minor poets. Applying this 
 principle to business, we shall find much to disturb 
 the self-content of second-rate litterateurs and savans, 
 who are accustomed to congratulate themselves that, 
 if others have the money, they at least have the brains, 
 if we should sharply scrutinize the mental processes 
 of a first-rate merchant. Is it observation you de- 
 mand ? Behold with what keen accuracy he perceives 
 and discriminates facts. Is it understanding ? Lock
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 139 
 
 ftt the long trains of reasoning, — the conclusion of 
 each argument forming the premise of the next, — • 
 by which he moves, step by step, to an induction on 
 whose soundness he risks character and fortune. Is 
 it will ? Mark him when a financial hurricane sweeps 
 over the money-market, and observe how firm is his 
 grasp of principles, and how intelligently his cold eye 
 surveys che future, while croakers all around him are 
 selling and sacrificing their property in paroxysms of 
 imbecile apprehension. Is it imagination ? See how 
 to him, in his dingy counting-house, the past becomes 
 present, and the distant, near ; his mind speeding from 
 St. Petersburg to London, from Smyrna to Calcutta, 
 on wings which mock the swiftness of steamers and 
 telegraphs ; or, bridging over the spaces which divide 
 Bensible realities from ideal possibilities, see how he 
 blends in one consistent idea and purpose stray 
 thoughts and separate facts, whose hidden analogies 
 the eye alone of imagination could divine. Is it, in 
 short, general force and refinement of mind ? Behold 
 bow comprehensive and how cautious is his glance over 
 that sensitive, quivering, ever-shifting sea of commer- 
 cial phenomena, — so wide as to belt the globe, and 
 so intimately connected that a jar in any part sends 
 » thrill through the whole, — and note with what 
 lubtle certaintj of insighf he penetrates beneath the
 
 *40 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 leeming anarchy, and clutches the slippery and elu« 
 Bive but unvarying laws. There is, indeed, a com- 
 mercial genius, as well as a poetical and metaphysi- 
 cal genius, — the faculties the same, the sentiments 
 and the direction different. Wealth may be, if you 
 please, often insolent and unfeeling ; may scorn, aa 
 visionary, things more important than wealth ; but still 
 it is less frequently blundered into than artists and 
 philosophers are inclined to believe. 
 
 But though we can thus trace the same radical 
 mental energy in industrial as in artistical labors* 
 the force and durability of a nation's mind still de- 
 mand not only diversity in its industrial occupations, 
 but a diversity in the direction of the mind itself, 
 which shall answer to the various sentiments and ca- 
 pacities of the soul. It is in this comprehensive- 
 ness that most nations fail, their activity being nar- 
 rowed by the dominion of one impulse and tendency, 
 which leads them to the summit of some special 
 excellence, and then surely precipitates them into 
 decay and ruin. Such narrowness is the death of 
 mind, and national exclusiveness is national suicide. 
 Thus the genius and capital of Italy were dispropor- 
 tionately directed to the fine arts ; its wealth is now, 
 accordingly, too much in palaces and cathedrals, in 
 pictures and statues ; and its worship of beauty, and
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 141 
 
 Jisdain of the practical, have resulted in an idle and 
 impoverished people, deficient in persistency, in en- 
 ergy, even in artistical creativeness, and the easy 
 prey of insolent French and Austrian arms and 
 diplomacy. Such a country cannot be made free by 
 introducing acres of rant on the rights of man, but 
 by establishing commerce, manufactures, and a living 
 industry. Again, the higher philosophy of Germany 
 has been directed too exclusively to abstract specu- 
 lation, altogether removed from actual life ; and the 
 reason is not to be sought in the assertion that the 
 German mind lacks solidity, but in the fact that an 
 arbitrary government has heretofore refused all free- 
 dom to German thought, unless it were exercised in 
 a region above the earth and beyond politics, and 
 there it may be the chartered libertine of chaos or 
 atheism. By thus denying citizenship to the thinker, 
 the state has made him licentious in speculation. 
 lie may theorize matter out of existence, Christ out 
 of the Scriptures, and God out of the universe 
 and the government nods in the very sleepiness of 
 toleration; but the moment he doubts the wisdom 01 
 some brazen and nonsensical lie embodied in a law, 
 or whispers aught against the meanest official under- 
 ling, he does it w'th the dungeon or the scaffold star- 
 \Dg him in the face ; and the grim headsman perhaps
 
 142 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 reminds h'm that he lives under a paternal govern- 
 ment, wl dre he is free to blaspheme God, but not to 
 insult the House of Hapsburg. Now, as the German's 
 metaphysics have been vitiated by his lack of politi- 
 cal rights, and as the Italian's exclusive devotion to 
 art has extinguished even the energy by which art 
 is produced, so there is danger that our extreme 
 practical and political turn will vulgarize and debase 
 our national mind to that low point where the ener- 
 gy and the motive to industrial production are lost. 
 There can be no reasonable fear that the beautiful 
 in art or the transcendental in thought will over- 
 whelm our faculty of making bargains ; but there ia 
 danger that the nation's worship of labors whose 
 worth is measured by money will give a sordid char- 
 acter to its mightiest exertions of power, eliminate 
 heroism from its motives, destroy all taste for lofty 
 Speculation and all love for ideal beauty, and inflame 
 individuals with a devouring self-seeking, corrupting 
 the very core of the national life. The safety of the 
 American from this gulf of selfishness and avarice is 
 to be looked for, partly in the prodigious moral, 
 mental, and benevolent agencies he has established 
 nil around him, and partly in that not unamiable 
 ranity by which he is impelled, not only to make 
 money, but to do something great or "smart" in hit 
 >\ay of making it
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 143 
 
 This living and restless mass of being which forma 
 the organic body of American life, — decent, orderly, 
 respectable, intelligent, and productive, — with Eco- 
 nomics as the watchword of its onward movement, has, 
 from the intensity of its practical direction, roused 
 the diseased opposition of two classes on the vanish- 
 ing extremes of its solid substance ; namely, a class 
 of violent reformers who scorn economics on the 
 ground of morality, and a class of violent radicals 
 who scorn economics on the ground of glory ; and 
 these are in irreconcilable enmity with each other, as 
 well as in distempered antagonism to the nation. 
 The first class, commonly passing under the name of 
 " Come-outers," have almost carried the principle of 
 free-will and personal responsibility to the extent of 
 converting themselves from individuals into individu- 
 alisms, and they brand every man who consents to 
 stay in a wicked community like ours as a partici- 
 pant in the guilt and profits of its sins. The Come- 
 outer, when he thoroughly comes out, protests against 
 the whole life of society, condemning, from certain 
 abstract propositions, all its concrete laws, customs, 
 morality, and religion, and strives to separate himself 
 rrom the national mind, and live morally and men- 
 tally apart from it. But this last is a hopeless effort. 
 To the community he is vitally bound, and he can
 
 1 44 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 no more escape from it than he can escape from the 
 grasp of the earth's attraction should he leap into the 
 air for the purpose of establishing himself away off 
 in space. The earth would say to him, as she 
 hauled him back, " If you dislike my forests, fell them ; 
 if my mountains trouble you, blast through them ; plant 
 in me what you will, and, climate permitting, it shall 
 grow ; but as for your leaving me, and speeding off 
 into infinite space on a vagabond excursion round the 
 sun on your own account, that you shall not do, so 
 help me — gravitation ! " 
 
 It is needless to say that the Come-outer, in his 
 zeal for abstract morality, glories in a heroic indif- 
 ference to consequences, and a conscientious blindness 
 to the mutual relations of rights and duties. In- 
 trenched in some passionate proposition, he exhibits 
 a perfect mastery of that logic of anarchy }y which 
 single virtues, detached from their relations, are 
 pushed into fanaticism and almost take the form of 
 vices. Virtue consists in the harmony of virtues ; 
 but, divorcing moral insight from moral sentiment, 
 he ignores the complexity of the world's practical 
 affairs, and would go, in the spirit of Schiller's zealot, 
 
 " Right onward like the lightning and 
 The cannon-ball, opening with murderous crash. 
 His way to blast and ruin."
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 14S 
 
 Indeed, he sometimes brings to mind the story of 
 that wise man who, when he desired to make a cup 
 of tea, could hit upon no happier contrivance for 
 boiling the kettle than by placing it in the kitchen 
 and setting his house on fire. Again, he is some- 
 times raised to such a height of feverish indignation 
 as to mistake his raptures of moral rage for prophet- 
 ic fury, and anticipates the stern, sure, silent march 
 of avenging laws with a blast that splits the brazen 
 throats of denunciation's hundred trumpets. In view 
 of the evils of the world he seems hungry for a fire 
 from heaven to smite and consume iniquity. His 
 prayer seems continually to be, " Lord, why so 
 Blow?" and, though this discontent may be termed by 
 some enthusiasts a divine impatience, it appears to be 
 rather an impatience with Divinity. It is the exact 
 opposite of that sublime repose in the purposes of 
 Providence expressed by the philosophical historian, 
 that " God moves through history as the giants of 
 Homer through space : he takes a step, — and agea 
 have rolled away ! " 
 
 Doubtless, in this class of extreme social Protest- 
 ants, — a class whose peculiarities we have almost 
 heightened to caricature, in attempting to individu- 
 alize its ideal, — there is much talent, much disinter- 
 estedness, much unflinching courage ; and, if thej 
 
 ' 4
 
 146 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 would make a modest contribution of these to tho 
 nation's moral life, they and society would botli be 
 gainers ; but they are " self-withdrawn into such a won™ 
 Erous depth " of hostile seclusion, that they are only 
 visible in their occasional incursions, or when they 
 encamp in the community during Anniversary Week. 
 They are not, in fact, more narrow, more ridden by 
 their one idea of morals, than many of our practical 
 men, who are ridden by their one idea of money ; 
 but their extravagance of phrase, almost annihilating, 
 as it does, the meaning of words considered as signs 
 of things, prevents their influencing the people they 
 attack ; and, after beginning with a resounding prom- 
 ise to reform the world, they too often end in a 
 desperate emulation among themselves to bear off the 
 palm in vehemence of execration, launched against all 
 those organized institutions by which society is pro- 
 tected from the worst consequences of its worldliness, 
 Belfi-hness, sensuality, and crime. 
 
 As the class of persons to which we have just re- 
 ferred push the principle of individualism to the ex- 
 tent of forswearing allegiance to the community, sc 
 there is another class, on the opposite extreme, who 
 carry the doctrine of a Providence in human affairs 
 lo a fatalistic conclusion, which they are pleased tc 
 tall Manifest Destiny ; a doctrine which baptizes rob
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 147 
 
 bery and murder as providential phenomena, — what 
 kind and condescending patrons of Providence these 
 blackguards are, to be sure ! — of inherent national 
 tendencies ; considers national sins simply as neces- 
 Bary events in the nation's progress to glory ; and, by 
 treating every direction given to the public mind as 
 inevitable, is sure to inflame and pamper the worst. 
 This dogma — the coinage of rogues, who find it 
 very convenient to call man's guilt by the name of 
 God's providence — mostly obtains on the southern 
 frontier of our country, where the settlers, amidst 
 their forests and swamps, have a delectable view of 
 the land flowing with milk and honey, which destiny 
 manifestly intends they shall occupy, on the clearest 
 principles of the argumentation of rapine. It must 
 be admitted that this class of our fellow-sinners and 
 citizens, by holding up endless war and hectic glory 
 in the faces of our shrewd and prudent worldlings, 
 scare them much more than the hottest and hearti- 
 est invectives of the reformers. We bear, it seems, 
 with bland composure the charge of being robbers 
 and murderers, tyrants and liberticides ; but our blood 
 runs cold at the vision of a bomb descending into 
 Boston or xsew York, or the awful calamity in- 
 volved \n the idea of United States sixes going 
 telow par'
 
 148 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 Manifest Destiny is, of course, a tempestuously, 
 furious patriot, whose speech — ever under a high 
 pressure of bombast — is plentifully bedizened with 
 metaphors of his country's stars and stripes, and rap- 
 turous anticipations of the rascal's " good time com- 
 ing." Among other Satanic fallacies he has one, 
 conned out of the Devil's prayer-book, called, " Our 
 country, right or wrong!" a stupid fallacy at the best, 
 when we consider that the activity of every nation 
 is bounded by inexorable moral laws as by walls of 
 fire, to pass which is to be withered up and con- 
 sumed; but especially fallacious from his lips, when 
 we reflect that, practically, he inverts the maxim, 
 and really means, " Our country, wrong or right, with 
 a decided preference for the former." Spite of all 
 professions, we must doubt the fidelity of that sailor 
 who, in a hurricane, shows his devotion to his ship 
 by assisting her tendency downward ; and, on the same 
 principle, we may doubt Mr. Manifest Destiny's all- 
 for-glory, nothing-for-money patriotism. 
 
 The fallacy, indeed, of the fatalistic scheme, as 
 applied to nations, is the same as when applied tr 
 individuals ; and its doctrine of inevitable tendencies 
 comes from considering mind as a blind force, not a» 
 tn intelligent, responsible, self-directing energy. A 
 plastic, fluid, impressible national mind. ):ke the
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. I4fi 
 
 American, receives a new impulse and direction few 
 every grand sentiment, every great thought, every 
 heroic act, every honest life, contributed to it ; and 
 that philosophy which screams out to reasonable citi- 
 zens, " The tendency of the nation is toward the 
 edge of the bottomless pit, therefore, patriotically as- 
 sist the movement," is the insane climax of the non 
 tequitur in political logic. Why, we can shield our- 
 selves from such a conclusion, with no better reason- 
 ing than that employed by the grave-digger in Hamlet, 
 in discussing the question of suicide : " Here lies the 
 water ; here stands the man : if the man go to the 
 water and drown himself, it is — will he, nill he — he 
 goes ; but if the water come to him, and drown him, 
 he drowns not himself: argal, he that is not guilty 
 of his own death shortens not his own life." We 
 may be sure that no nation, which goes not to the 
 fire, will ever have the fire come to it. Heaven is 
 liberal of its blessings and benignities, but it prac- 
 tises a rigid economy in dispensing its smiting curses, 
 and lets loose its reluctant angels of calamity and 
 death only as they are drawn down by the impious 
 prayers of folly and crime ! 
 
 If the too exclusive direction, of the American 
 tnind to industrial production has not been much 
 checked by the two antagonistic extremes of radical*
 
 150 THE AMEKICAN MIND. 
 
 *sm its money-ocracy has provoked, and for whose 
 excesses it is to a great degree responsible, we must 
 look for a healthier opposition to it in the various 
 classes of moderate dissentients and reformers, who 
 are not so much disgusted with the community as to 
 lose all power of influencing it, and who are steadily 
 infusing into their own and the national character 
 loftier ideas and more liberalizing tastes. Our church- 
 es, collegiate institutions, and numerous societies es- 
 tablished for moral and benevolent ends, are connected 
 with the national mind, and at the same time are 
 inspired by influences apart from it ; but still, we 
 must admit that just in proportion as the nation's 
 life circulates through them is their tendency to tem- 
 porize with Mammon. The Church, for instance, ex- 
 ercises a vast and beneficent influence in spreading 
 moral and religious ideas ; but do we not often hear 
 sermons in which industrial prosperity is uncon- 
 sciously baptized with great pomp of sacred rhetoric ? 
 and prayers, in which railroads and manufactories 
 hold a place among Divine favors altogether different 
 from the estimate in which they are held above? 
 Do >\e, mad as we all are after riches, hear often 
 enough from the pulpit the spirit of those words i« 
 which Dean Swift, in his epitaph on the afiluent ami 
 piodigate Colonel Chartres, announces the small es-
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 151 
 
 teem of wealth in the eyes of God, from the fact of 
 his thus lavishing it upon the meanest and basest of 
 his creatures? 
 
 Our theology is closer to the public mind, both to 
 act and to be acted upon, than our literature. In- 
 deed, if we take the representative men of those 
 classes whose productions, ethical, poetical, and artis- 
 tical, we call American literature and art, we shall 
 find that the national life is not so much their inspi- 
 ration as it is the object they would inspire. Chan- 
 ning and Allston, for instance, have a purified deli- 
 cacy and refinement of nature, a constant reference 
 to the universal in morals and taste, and a want of 
 ruddy and robust strength, indicating that they have 
 not risen genially out of the national mind, and be- 
 traying, in all their words and colors, that surround- 
 ing influences were hostile rather than sustaining to 
 their genius. Their works, accordingly, have neither 
 the exclusiveness nor the raciness and gusto charac- 
 teristic of genius which is national. The same prin- 
 ciple applies to our poetical literature, which worships 
 Beauty, but not beautiful America. If you observe 
 the long line of the English poets, Chaucer, Shake- 
 speare, Ben Jonson, Dryden, Pope, Byron, with hardly 
 the exceptions of Spenser and Miiton, you will find 
 that, however heaven-high some <-i them are in ele-
 
 152 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 ration, they all rest on the solid base of Englisfc 
 character; idealize, realize, or satirize English histor) 
 customs, or scenery, English modes of thought and 
 forms of society, English manners or want of manners, 
 English life and English men, — are full, in short, 
 of English blood. But our most eminent poets — 
 Dana, Emerson, Bryant, Longfellow, Lowell — are 
 more or less idealists, from the necessity of their 
 position. Though they may represent the woods and 
 streams of American nature, they commonly avoid 
 the passions and thoughts of American human nature. 
 The " haunt and main region of their song " is man 
 rather than men ; humanity in its simple elements, 
 rather than complex combinations ; and their mission 
 »s to stand somewhat apart from the rushing stream 
 of American industrial life, and, assimilating new ele- 
 ments from other literatures, or directly from visible 
 nature, to pour into that stream, as rills into a river, 
 ihoughtfulness, and melody, and beauty. Their pro- 
 ductions being thus contributions to the national 
 mind, rather than offsprings of it, are contempla- 
 tive rather than lyrical, didactic lather than dra- 
 matic. 
 
 Perhaps the fairest and least flattering expression 
 of our whole national life may be found in our poli- 
 tics ; fo" in limited monarchies and in democracies \\
 
 TEE AMERICAN MIND. 158 
 
 is in politics that all that there is in the public mind 
 of servility, stupidity, ferocity, and unreasoning pre- 
 judice is sure to come glaringly out ; and certainly 
 our politics will compare favorably with those of 
 Greece and Rome, of France and England, in re- 
 spect eithe.. to intelligence or morality. In no coun- 
 try is the government more narrowly watched ; in no 
 country do large parties, bound together by an inter- 
 est, more readily fall apart on a principle ; and when 
 we consider that, in practical politics, force and pas- 
 Bion, not reason and judgment, are predominant, — 
 that men vote with a storm of excitement hurrying 
 them on, — this fact indicates that the minor morali' 
 ties have to a great extent become instincts with th(. 
 people. It would be impossible to give here even a 
 scanty view of this political expression of our national 
 mind with its sectional contests, its struggles of free- 
 dom with slavery, its war of abstract philosophies ou 
 concrete interests, its impassioned moralities, and no 
 less impassioned immoralities ; but perhaps a few 
 remarks on three great statesmen, who are marked 
 by unmistakable local and national traits, and who 
 were genuine products of American life, may not be 
 out of placa even here. We .efer to Webster, Clay, 
 and Calhoun. These, though "dead, yet speak", 
 and we shall allude to them as if they still occupied 
 7*
 
 154 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 bodily that position in our politics which they in* 
 questionably occupy mentally. Sucb men can only die 
 with the movements they originated. 
 
 Of these three eminences of our politics, of late 
 years, Webster may be called the most comprehend 
 8ive statesman, Clay the most accomplished politician, 
 and Calhoun the nimblest and most tenacious sec- 
 tional partisan. Webster, on the first view, seems a 
 kind of Roman-Englishman, — a sort of cross between 
 Cincinnatus and Burke ; but, examined more closely, 
 he is found to be a natural elevation in the progress 
 of American life, a man such as New Hampshire 
 bore him, and such as Winthrop and Standish, 
 Washington and Jay, Hamilton and Madison, have 
 made him ; a man who drew the nutriment of char- 
 acter altogether from American influences ; and, es- 
 pecially, a man representing the iron of the national 
 character as distinguished from its quicksilver. The 
 principal wealth of New Hampshire is great men and 
 water-po" er ; but, instead of keeping them to herself, 
 she squanders them on Massachusetts, and Webster 
 was one of these free gifts. 
 
 If we compare Webster with Calhoun, we shall find 
 in both the same firm mental grasp of principles, the 
 game oversight of the means of popularity, and the 
 lame ungraceful and almost sullen self-assertion, a)
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 155 
 
 periods when policy would have dictated a more fa* 
 eile accommodativeness. Their intellects, though both 
 in some degree entangled by local interests and 
 opinions, have inherent differences, visible at a glance. 
 Webster's mind has more massiveness than Calhoun's, 
 is richer in culture and variety of faculty, and is 
 gifted with a wider sweep of argumentation ; but it 
 is not so completely compacted with character, and 
 has, accordingly, less inflexible and untiring persist- 
 ence toward an object. Both are comparatively un- 
 impressible, but Webster's understanding recognizes 
 nnd includes facts which his imagination may refuse 
 to assimilate ; while Calhoun arrogantly ignores every- 
 thing which contradicts his favorite opinions. The 
 mind of Webster, weighty, solid, and capacious, looks 
 before and after ; by its insight reads principles in 
 events, by its foresight reads events in principles 
 and, arching gloriously over all the phenomena of a 
 widely complex subject of contemplation, views things, 
 not singly, but in their multitudinous relations ; yet 
 the very comprehension of his vision makes him 
 somewhat timid, and his moderation, accordingly, lacks 
 the crowning grace of moral audacity. Calhoun has 
 audacity, but lacks comprehensiveness. 
 
 As Webster's mind, from its enlargement of view, 
 bas an instinctive intellectual conscientiousness, the
 
 J 56 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 processes of his reasoning are principally indnctiv^ 
 rising from facts to principles ; while Calhoun's are 
 principally deductive, descending from principles tc 
 facts. Now deduction is doubtless a sublime exercise 
 of logical genius, provided the principle be reached — 
 as it is reached by Webster, when he uses the pro- 
 cess — by induction; for it gives the mind power to 
 divine the future, and converts prophecy into a science. 
 Thus, from the deductive law of gravitation we can 
 predict the appearance of stellar phenomena thousands 
 of years hence. Edmund Burke is the greatest of 
 British statesmen, in virtue of his discovery and ap- 
 plication of deductive laws applicable to society and 
 government. But the mischief of Calhoun's deductive 
 method is, that, by nature or position, his understand- 
 ing is controlled by his will ; and, consequently, his 
 principles are often arbitrarily or capriciously chosen, 
 do not rise out of the nature of things, but out of 
 the nature of Mr. Calhoun ; and therefore it is fre- 
 quently true of him, what Macaulay untruly declares 
 of Burke, that "he chooses his position like a fanat- 
 ic, and defends it like a philosopher," — as it might 
 be said that Clay chooses his like a tactician, and de- 
 fends it like a fanatic. 
 
 If we carefully study the speeches of Web<ter and 
 Calhoun, in one of those great Congressional battle*
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND 157 
 
 where they were fairly pitted against each other, we 
 ghall find that Webster's mind darts beneath the 
 smooth and rapid stream of his opponent's deductive 
 argument at a certain point, — fastens fatally on some 
 phrase, or fact, or admission, in which the fallacy 
 lurks, — and then devotes his reply to a searching 
 analysis and logical overthrow of that, without heed- 
 ing the rest. Calhoun, of course, has the ready 
 rejoinder that the thing demolished is twisted out of 
 its relations ; and then, with admirable control of hia 
 face, proceeds to dip into Webster's inductive argu- 
 ment, to extract some fact or principle which is in- 
 dissolubly related to what goes before and comes 
 after, and thus really misrepresents the reasoning he 
 seemingly answers. To overthrow Calhoun you have, 
 likt Napoleon at Wagram, only to direct a tremen- 
 dous blow at the centre ; to overthrow Webster, 
 like Napoleon at Borodino, you must rout the whole 
 line. 
 
 . In *he style of the two men we have, perhaps, 
 the best expression of their character; for style, it 
 has been well said, "is the measure of power, — as 
 the waves of the sea answer to the winds that caii 
 them up." Web.-ter's style varies with the moods 
 •f his mind, — short, crisp, biting, in sarcasm; lumi- 
 aous and even in statement; ligid, condensed, massive
 
 158 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 in argumentation; lofty and resounding in feeling 
 fierce, hot, direct, overwhelming, in passion. Cal- 
 houn's has the uniform vigor and clear precision of 
 a spoken essay. 
 
 Clay — the love of American economics, as Web- 
 ster was the pride — had all those captivating per 
 sonal qualities which attract men's admiration, at the 
 Bame time that they enforce their respect; and was 
 especially gifted with that flexibility, — that prompt, 
 intuitive, heart-winning grace, — which his great con- 
 temporaries lacked. The secret of his influence must 
 not be sought in his printed speeches. We never go 
 to them as we go to Webster's and Calhoun's for 
 political philosophy and vehement logic. But if 
 Webster as an orator was inductive, and convinced 
 the reason, and Calhoun deductive, and dazzled the 
 reason, Clay was most assuredly seductive, and car- 
 ried the votes. The nature of Clay, without being 
 deficient in force, was plastic and fluid, readily ac- 
 commodating itself to the moment's exigency, and 
 more solicitous to comprehend all the elements of 
 party power than all the elements of political thought. 
 His faculties and passions seem all to have united in 
 One power of personal impressiveness, and that per- 
 •onality once penetrated ;i whole party, hound togeth- 
 er discordant interests and antipathies, made itself
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 159 
 
 felt as inspiration equally in Maine and Louisiana, 
 concentrated in itself the enthusiasm of sense for 
 principles, and of sensibility for men ; and these, the 
 qualities of a powerful political leader, who makes all 
 the demagogues work for him, without being himself 
 a demagogue, indicated his possession of something, at 
 least, of that 
 
 " Mystery of commanding ; 
 That birth-hour gift, that art-Napoleon, 
 Of winning, fettering, wielding, moulding, banding 
 The hearts of millions, till they move as one." 
 
 But the fact that Clay never reached the object 
 of his ambition proves that he was not a perfect 
 specimen of the kind of character to which he be- 
 longed ; and his personality, — swift, fusing, potent as 
 it was, — alert, compromising, supple as it was, — 
 still was not under thoroughly wise direction ; and a 
 sense of honor morbidly quick, and a resentment of 
 slight nervously egotistic, sometimes urged our most 
 accomplished politician into impolitic acts, which lev- 
 elled the labors of years. 
 
 Perhaps the best test even of a man's intellect is 
 the way he demeans himself when he is enraged; 
 and in this Webster was pre-eminent above all 
 American orators, while Calhoun was apt to lose his 
 balance, and become petty and passionate, and Claj
 
 160 THE AMERICAN MIND 
 
 to exhibit a kind of glorious recklessness. Most of 
 the faults of Webster proceeded from his comprehen- 
 siveness of understanding being often unaccompanied 
 by a vigorous impetus from sentiment and feeling 
 and some of his orations are therefore unimpassioned 
 statements and arguments, which, however much they 
 may claim our assent as logicians, do not stir, and 
 thrill, and move us as men. Coming from but one 
 portion of his own nature, they touch only one portion 
 of the nature of others, and wield no dominion over 
 the will. Such was his celebrated speech on the Slav 
 ery question, which so many found difficult to answer 
 and impossible to accept. Not so was it when passion 
 and sentiment penetrated his understanding; for, in 
 Webster, passion was a fire which fused intellect and 
 character into one tremendous personal force, and 
 then burst out that resistless eloquence in which words 
 have the might and meaning of things, — that true 
 mental electricity, not seen in dazzling, zigzag flashes, 
 . — not heard in a grand, reverberating peal over the 
 head, — but in which, mingling the qualities of light 
 and sound, the blue bright flame startles and stings the 
 eye at the very moment the sharp crash pierces and 
 stuns the ear. No brow smitten by that holt, though the 
 brow of a Titan, could ever afterward lift itself above 
 the crowd without being marked by its enduring scar
 
 THE AMEKICAN MIND. 161 
 
 »nd it was well that a great, and not easily moved, 
 nature, abundantly tried by all that frets and teases 
 the temper, should thus have borne within himself 
 Buch a terrible instrument of avenging justice, when 
 meanness presumed too far on the moderation of that 
 large intellect, when insolence goaded too sharply that 
 sullen fortitude ! 
 
 The three great statesmen to whom we have re- 
 ferred, taken together, cover three all-important ele- 
 ments in every powerful national mind, — resistance, 
 persistence, and impressibility ; and each, by repre- 
 senting at the same time some engrossing industrial 
 interest, indicates that practical direction of the na 
 tional energies to which we have all along referred. 
 In this region of industry the nation has been grand- 
 ly creative ; and, by establishing the maxim that the 
 production of wealth is a matter secondary to ita 
 distribution, it promises to be as grandly beneficent. 
 But, perhaps, in the art and science of government it 
 has been more creative and more beneficent than in the 
 province of industry. The elements of order and radi- 
 calism it embosoms are in a healthy rather than de- 
 structive conflict, so that we may hope that even tha 
 problem of slavery will be settled without any wide- 
 ipread ruin and devastation. The mischief of radi« 
 sal ism in other countries is, that it commences ref
 
 162 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 Drmation by abjuring ]a\v; accordingly, it oppose* 
 political power on the principles of anarchy, and 
 wields it on the principles of despotism. Here the 
 toughest problem in the science of government has 
 been practically solved, by the expedient of legaliz- 
 ing resistance ; and thus, by providing legal inlets 
 and outlets for insurrection and revolution, we reap 
 the benefits of rebellion, and avoid its appalling evils.* 
 A nation which has done this can afford to bear 
 some taunts on its vices and defects, especially as 
 its sensitive vanity impels it to appropriate the truth 
 contained in every sarcasm under which it winces. 
 
 It now remains to ask how a national mind like 
 the American, with its powers generally directed by 
 its sentiments to commerce, industrial production, law, 
 and politics, — which are the most lucrative occupa- 
 tions, — and but relatively directed to reforms, — 
 which are the most unprofitable, — how it appears 
 when tested by those virtues which are the conditions 
 of a nation's durable strength? The question is not 
 one of particulars, because, in every social system, no 
 matter how far advanced in humane culture, there, 
 will always be individuals and small classes repre- 
 senting the vices of every grade of civilization which 
 
 • The crime of the Southern Rebellion specially consiited it 
 riolating this fundamental principle of American politics.
 
 THE AMERICAN MIND. 163 
 
 history or tradition has recorded, from cannitals all 
 the way down to dandies. We have our share of 
 New Zealand and our share of Almacks ; but in 
 viewing a national mind we must fasten on the 
 strongest elements and the average humanity. Looked 
 at from this liberal point, American life would bear 
 comparatively well the tests of prudence, moderation, 
 and benevolence ; a little less confidently, those of 
 veracity, steadfastness, and justice ; and considerably 
 less those of beauty, heroism, and self-devotion. 
 
 But it is not so much in the present as in the fu- 
 ture that we have the grandest vision of the Amer- 
 ican mind. We have seen that its organic substance, 
 as distinguished from the unas>imilated elements in 
 contact or conflict with it, is solidly and productively 
 practical ; and as it is a sleepless energy, resisting, 
 persisting, and impressible, we may hope that it will 
 transmute into itself the best life of other national 
 minds, without having its individuality overwhelmed ; 
 that it will be strong and beautiful witli their virtues 
 and accomplishments, without being weak with their 
 vices and limitations ; and that, continually enriched 
 by new and various mental life, it will result in being 
 h. comprehensive national mind, harmoniously com- 
 bining characteristics caught from all nations, — so 
 that Greece might in it recognize beauty, and Koine
 
 164 THE AMERICAN MIND. 
 
 will, and Germany earnestness, and Italy art, ano 
 France vivacity, and Ireland impulse, and England 
 tenacity. It is in this contemplation of America as 
 a conquering Mind that we should most delight, — a 
 mind worthy of the broad continent it is to overarch, 
 — a mind too sound at the core for ignorance to stu- 
 pefy, or avarice to harden, or lust of power to con- 
 sume, — a mind full in the line of the historical 
 progress of the race, holding wide relations with all 
 communities and all times, listening to every word 
 of cheer or warning muttered from dead or thundered 
 from living lips, and moving down the solemn path- 
 way of the ages, an image of just, intelligent, benefi- 
 cent Power I 
 
 tier
 
 1 
 
 VI 
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 T IB hardly necessary for us to say that a nation 
 is not a mere aggregation of existing individu- 
 als, or collection of provinces and colonies, but an 
 organic living body of laws, institutions, manners, and 
 literature, whose present condition is the result of the 
 bIow growth of ages, and whose roots stretch far back 
 into the past life of the people. By a national mind 
 we mean the whole moral and mental life of a 
 nation, as embodied in its facts and latent in its 
 sentiments and ideas. This body of mind, the organ- 
 ization of centuries, exercises, in virtue of its mass, 
 a positive attractive force on all individual minds 
 within the sphere of its influence, compelling them 
 to be partakers of the thoughts and passions of t lie 
 national heart and brain, and receiving in return 
 their contributions of individual thoughts and passions. 
 Now a national mind is great according to the vitality 
 and vigor at the centre of its being, the fidelity with 
 which it re&ists whatever is foreign to its own n*»
 
 166 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 ture, and its consequent perseverance in its own 
 mherent laws of development. Tried by these tests, 
 that pyramidal organism, with John Bidl at the base 
 and Shakespeare at the apex, which we call the 
 English mind, is unexcelled, if not unequalled, in 
 modern times tor its sturdy force ot being, its mus- 
 cular strength of faculty, the variety of its directing 
 sentiments, and its tough hold upon existence. No 
 other national mind combines such vast and various 
 creativeness, and presents so living a synthesis of 
 seemingly elemental contradictions, which is at the 
 same time marked by such distinctness of individual 
 features. That imperial adjective, English, fits its 
 sedition as well as its servility, its radicalism as well 
 as its conservatism, its squalor as well as its splendor, 
 its vice as well "as its virtue, its morality and relig- 
 ion as well as its politics and government. The 
 unity of its nature is never lost in all the prodigious 
 variety of its manifestation. Prince, peasant, Cavalier, 
 Roundhead. Whig, Tory, poet, penny-a-liner, philan- 
 thropist, ruffian, — William Wilberforce in Parliament, 
 Richard Turpin on the York road. — all agree in 
 being English, all agree in a common contempt, 
 blatant or latent, for everything not English. Lib- 
 erty is English, wisdom is English, philosophy is 
 English, religion is English, eartli is English, air if
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 167 
 
 Englisl y heaven is English, hell is English. And 
 this imperious dogmatism, too, has none of the uneasy 
 self-distrust which peeps through the vociferous brag 
 of corresponding American phenomena ; but, express- 
 ing its seated faith in egotism's most exquisite non 
 sequiturs, it says stoutly, with Parson Adams, " A 
 schoolmaster is the greatest of men, and I am the 
 greatest of schoolmasters " ; and, moreover, it believes 
 what it says. The quality is not in the tongue, but 
 in the character of the nation. 
 
 This solid self-confidence and pride of nationality, 
 this extraordinary content with the image reflected in 
 the mirror of self-esteem, indicates that the national 
 mind is not tormented by the subtle sting of abstract 
 opinions or the rebuking glance of unrealized ideals, 
 but that its reason and imagination work on the level 
 of its Will. The essential peculiarity, therefore, of 
 the English Mind is its basis in Character, and con- 
 sequent hold upon facts and disregard of abstractions. 
 Coarse, strong, massive, sturdy, practical, — organizing 
 its thoughts into faculties, and toughening its faccWes 
 into the consistency of muscle and bone, — its wh do 
 soul is so embodied and embrained, that it imprint* 
 on its most colossal mental .abors tie stern charac- 
 teristics of shier physical strength. It not only haa 
 fire, but fuel enough to feed its fire. Its thoughts
 
 168 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 are acts, its theories are institutions, its volitions are 
 events. It has no ideas not inherent in its own 
 organization, or which it has not assimilated and 
 absorbed into its own nature by collision or com- 
 munion with other national minds. It is enriched 
 but never overpowered by thoughts and impulses 
 from abroad, for whatever it receives it forces into 
 harmony with its own broadening processes of inte- 
 rior development. Thus the fiery, quick-witted, wilful 
 and unscrupulous Norman encamped in its domains, 
 and being unable to reject him, and its own stubborn 
 vitality refusing to succumb, it slowly and sullenly, 
 through long centuries, absorbed him into itself, and 
 blended fierce Norman pride and swift Norman intel- 
 ligence with its own solid substance of sense and 
 humor. By the same jealous and resisting, but assim- 
 ilative method, it gradually incorporated the principles 
 of Roman law into its jurisprudence, and the spirit of 
 Italian, Spanish, and German thought into its litera- 
 ture, receiving nothing, however, which it did not 
 modify with its own individuality, and scrawling 
 "England, her mark," equally on what it borrowed 
 and what it created. 
 
 A national mind thus rooted in character, with an 
 organizing genius directed by homely sentiments, and 
 with its sympathies fastened on palpable aims ano
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 109 
 
 objects, has all the strength which comes* from ideas 
 invigorated but narrowed by facts. General maxims 
 disturb it not, for it never acts from reason alone, 
 or passion alone, or understanding alone ; but reason, 
 passion, understanding, conscience, religious sentiment, 
 are all welded together in its thoughts and actions, 
 and pure reason, or pure conscience, or pure passion, 
 it not only neglects, but stigmatizes. Its principles 
 are precedents buttressed by prejudices, and these are 
 obstinately asserted from force of character rather 
 than reasoned out by force of intellect. " Taffy," 
 said swearing Lord Chancellor Thurlow to Lord 
 Kenyon, " you are obstinate, and give no reasons ; 
 now Scott is obstinate, too, but he gives reasons, — 
 
 and bad ones they are ! " 
 
 Indeed, the English mind believes what it practises, 
 and practises what it believes, and is rarely weakened 
 in its active power by perceiving a law of morality 
 or intelligence higher than its own practical morality 
 and intelligence. It meets all emergencies with expe- 
 dients, and gives to its reasons the emphasis of its 
 will. Bringing everything to the test of common 
 pense and fact, it is blind to the operation cf the 
 great laws of rectitude and retribution objective to 
 itself, but trusts that the same practical sagacity and 
 practical energy which have heretofore met real dan-
 
 170 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 gers, will meet impending dangers when they become 
 real. It has no forecasting science of right, but 
 when self-preservation depends on its doing right, the 
 most abstract requirements of justice will be " done 
 into English " in as coarse and as sensible a way as 
 its old hack-writers translated Juvenal and Plutarch. 
 In the mean time it prefers to trust 
 
 " In the good old plan, 
 That they should take who have the power, 
 That they should keep who can." 
 
 Indeed, such a complete localization of thought, 
 morality, and religion was never before witnessed 
 in a civilized nation. It is content with the rela- 
 tive and the realized in manners, laws, institutions, 
 literature, and religion ; and it disowns the jurisdic- 
 tion, and sulkily disregards the judgments, of absolute 
 truth and morality. If its imperious and all-grasping 
 tyranny provokes a province into just rebellion, na- 
 tional statesmen send national warriors to put it 
 down, and prayers are offered in national churches 
 for the victory. The history of its Indian empire — 
 an empire built up by the valor and crimes of Clive, 
 and preserved by the serene remorselessness of 
 Hastings's contriving intellect — is as interesting as 
 the " Pirate's Own Book," and exhibits the triumph 
 of similar principles ; but whatever is done for the
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 171 
 
 national aggrandizement is not only vindicated but 
 baptized ; and when Edmund Burke made the most 
 desperate effort in the history of eloquence to induce 
 the highest court of the realm to apply the Higher 
 Law to the enormities of Hastings, he not only failed 
 of success, but the English mind condemns him now 
 for vituperating the character of " an eminent servant 
 of the public." There is no crime in such matters 
 but to fail in crime. We have heard, lately, many 
 edifying and sonorous sentences quoted from Engli«h 
 jurists about the law of God overriding the law of 
 man ; but it is not remembered that when an Eng- 
 lish jurist speaks of the law of God, he really means 
 that fraction of it which he thinks has become, or is 
 becoming, the law of England. To make a true 
 Englishman responsible for any maxim which is 
 essentially abstract, inorganic, «/iprecedented, and for- 
 eign to the interior working of the national mind, is 
 to misconceive both his meaning and his nature. No 
 great English humorist — that is, no man who sees 
 through phrases into characters — has ever blundered 
 Into such a mistake. The true localizing principle is 
 hinted by Goldsmith's braggart theologian: "When 1 
 Bay religion, I of course! mean the Christian religion 
 and when T say Christian religion, I would have you 
 know, «r, tnat I mean the Chjrch of England ! "
 
 172 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 Now iv 8 evident that a national mind thus proud 
 and practical, thus individual and insular, making, as 
 it does, the senses final, and almost deifying rank and 
 property, would naturally exhibit in its manners and 
 institutions a double aristocracy of blood and capital. 
 Hence results the most hateful of English character- 
 istics, — the disposition, we mean, of each order of 
 English society to play the sycophant to the class 
 above it, and the tyrant to the class below it ; though, 
 from the inherent vigor and independence of the 
 Englishman's nature, his servility is often but the 
 mask of his avarice or hatred. The best representa 
 tive of this unamiable combination of arrogance and 
 meanness is that full-blown Briton, or, as Parr would 
 have called him, that ' ; ruffian in ermine," Lord Chan- 
 cellor Thurlow, who could justly claim the rare dis- 
 tinction of being the greatest bully and the greatest 
 parasite of his time. But this peculiarity is com- 
 monly modified by nobler and sturdier qualities, and 
 the nation is especially felicitous in the coarse but 
 strong practical morality which is the life of its man- 
 ners. The fundamental principles of social order are 
 never brought into question by the average English 
 mind, and even its sensuality is honest and hearty, 
 unsophisticated by that subtile refinement of thinking 
 by which a Frenchman will blandly violate the tea
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 11 3 
 
 commandments on philosophic principles, and with 
 hardly the disturbance of a single rule of etiquette. 
 In the domestic virtues likewise, — in those attach- 
 ments which cluster round a family and a home, — 
 the Englishman is pre-eminent. The Frenchman is 
 wider and more generous in his generalities, more of 
 a universal philanthropist ; but his joy is out of doors, 
 pnd he would hardly, if he could help it, dine at 
 home for the salvation of mankind. But political 
 liberty is only for those who have homes and love 
 them ; and though the Englishman's theories are nar- 
 row, they are facts, while the Frenchman's, if more 
 expansive, are unrealized. 
 
 The leading defect of English manners, however 
 \a consequent on their chief merit. Being the natural 
 expression of the national mind, all the harshness as 
 well as all the honesty of the people is sincerely ex- 
 pressed in them ; and they press especially hard on 
 the poor and the helpless. In the mode of conduct- 
 ing political disputes, in the ferocity and coarseness 
 of political and personal libels, and in the habit of 
 calling unpleasant objects by their most unpleasant 
 names, we perceive; the national contempt of all tin 
 decent draperies which mental refinement casts ovei 
 «ensual tastes and aggres.-ive passions. The literatun 
 of the nation strikingly exhibits this ingrained 'oarse
 
 174 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 ness at the foundation of its mind, and its greatest 
 poets and novelists are full of it in their delineations 
 of manners and character. Chaucer and Shakespeare 
 humorously represent it ; Ben Jonson and Fielding, 
 the two most exclusively English of all England's 
 imaginative writers, are at once its happy expounders 
 and bluff exponents ; and Swift, whose large Saxon 
 brain was rendered fouler by misanthropy, absolutely 
 riots in the gutter. This robust manhood, anchored 
 deep in strong sensations and rough passions, gives 
 also a peculiar pugnacity to English manners. No 
 man can rise there who cannot stand railing, stand 
 invective, stand ridicule, " stand fight." Force of 
 character bears remorselessly down on everything and 
 everybody that resists it, and no man is safe who 
 cannot emphasize the " me." This harshness is a sign 
 of lusty health and vigor, and doubtless educates men 
 by opposition into self-reliance ; but woe unto those 
 it crushes ! Thus a friend of ours once strayed, in 
 the early part of the present century, into the Court 
 of King's Bench, where Lord Ellenborough then sat 
 in all the insolence of office, and where Mr. Garrovv, 
 the great cross-examining advocate, then wantoned in 
 all the arrogance of witness-badgering. The first ob- 
 ject that arrested his attention was a middle-aged 
 woman, whose plump red face and full form displayed
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 175 
 
 do natural pendency to disorders of the nerves, but 
 who was now very palpably in a violent fit of hys- 
 terics. Shocked at tin's exhibition, he asked a by- 
 stander the cause of her extraordinary emotion. 
 " O," was the indifferent reply, " she is a witness 
 whc has just been cross-examined by Mr. Garrow." 
 
 As English manners grew naturally out of English 
 character, so England's social and political institutions 
 have grown naturally out of English manners, and all 
 are hieroglyphics of national qualities. They express, 
 in somewhat grotesque forms and combinations, the 
 thoughts and sentiments of the ruling classes from age 
 to age. Springing originally out of the national heart 
 and brain, w r e may be sure that, however absurd and 
 even inhuman some of them may now appear, they 
 served a practical purpose, and met a national want, 
 at the period of their establishment ; and though the 
 forms in which the national life is embodied are clung 
 'o with a prejudice which sometimes boils into fanat- 
 ical fury, and though the dead body of an institution 
 is often fondly retained long after its spirit is de- 
 parted, this sullen conservative bigotry gives stability 
 and working power to the government amidst the 
 wildest storms of faction, and its evils are moderated 
 by a kind of reluctant reason and justice, which in 
 the long run gets the mastery. Thus the constitution
 
 176 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 Df the House of Commons, before the Eeform Bill of 
 1832, was not fitted to the altered circumstances of 
 the nation, and the reformers really adhered to the 
 principle of English popular representation in their 
 almost revolutionary changes in its forms ; but it 
 would be a great error to suppose that in the 
 unreformed House of Commons legislation did not 
 regard the interest of unrepresented constituencies, be- 
 cause it abstractly had the power to disregard them. 
 Such an impolitic exercise of political monopoly 
 would have reformed the representation a hundred 
 years ago. So was it, less than half a century ago, 
 with the horrible severity of the criminal law, which 
 made small thefts capital crimes, punishable with 
 death. Conservatives like Eldon and Ellenborough 
 opposed their repeal as vehemently as if the nationa." 
 safety depended on their remaining as scarecrows on 
 the statute books, though as judges they would no 
 more have executed them than they would have 
 committed murder. It is understood in England that 
 when the national mind outgrows a law, " its inactiv- 
 ity," in Plunket's phrase, "is its only excuse for ex- 
 istence," though to propose its repeal is to incur the 
 imputation of Jacobinism. " The wisdom of our an- 
 cestors," is the Englishman's reverent phrase as he 
 contemplates these gems from the antique ; but w«
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 177 
 
 •hould do injustice both to his humanity and his 
 jhrewdness, did we reason deductively from them to 
 results, as though they were still living institutions 
 issuing now in ghastly facts. He keeps the withered 
 and ugly symbols of his old bigotries for ornament, 
 not for use! 
 
 Indeed, this unreasoning devotion to organic forms, 
 even after they have lost all organic life, is ever 
 accompanied by a sagacity which swiftly accommo- 
 dates itself to emergencies ; and the sense of the 
 people never shines so resplendently as in avoiding 
 the full logical consequences of its nonsense, — which 
 nonsense we shall find had commonly its origin in 
 sense. Thus the abject theory of the Divine Right 
 of Kings was a politic and convenient fiction, in the 
 early days of the English Reformation, to operate 
 against the Jesuit theory of the sovereignty of the 
 people, by which the Papists hoped to re-establish 
 Romanism ; but when Protestant kings carried the 
 theory out into practice, the genius of the people as 
 easily extemporized a divine right of regicide and 
 revolution. But while the original theory was politic, 
 either as a weapon against Romanism or faction, it 
 is curious to observe how eagerly it was inculcated 
 by the national Church as a part of religion. South, 
 •peaking of deadly sins, refers to ''blaspheming God, 
 a* i
 
 178 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 disobeying the King, and the like " ; and even th« 
 
 heavenly-minded Taylor asserts, in perhaps the great- 
 est of ] lis sermons, "that perfect submission to kings 
 is the glory of the Protestant cause " ; and this per* 
 feet submission, not to the constitution and the laws, 
 but to the king, he proceeds, with superb sophistries, 
 to invest with the dignity of one of those Christian 
 works which are the signs of Christian faith. But 
 the moment that James the Second laid a rough hand 
 on the established safeguards of the property, lives, 
 and religion of the nation, the whole people fell a*, ay 
 from him ; the Tory who preached submission as a 
 duty, and the Whig who claimed rebellion as a right, 
 were both instantly united in a defence of their com- 
 mon English heritage ; and a tempest of opposition 
 arose whose breath blew the monarch from his 
 throne. 
 
 And this brings us to the consideration of the con- 
 crete and national character of English freedom, 
 which, having its foundations deep in the manner*} of 
 the people, and having organized its ideas in pro- 
 tecting institutions, has withstood all assaults because 
 it has ever been intrenched in facts. The nhUDnal 
 genius embodies, incarnates, realizes all its sentimer.ts 
 nnd thoughts. Establishing rights by the hard pro- 
 cess of growth and development, it holds them witn
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 179 
 
 pant's grasp. Seeing in them the grotesque reflec- 
 tion of its own anomalous nature, it loves them with 
 the rude tenderness of a lioness for her whelps. It 
 cares little for abstract liberty, but it will defend 
 its liberties to the death. It cares little for the 
 Rights of Man, but for the rights of English man it 
 will fight " till from its bones the flesh be hacked.' 
 It cares little for grand generabties about liberty 
 equality, and fraternity ; but, swearing lusty oaths, and 
 speaking from the level of character, it bluntly in- 
 forms rulers that, loving property, it will pay no 
 taxes which it does not itself impose, and that, being 
 proud, it will stand no invasion of its inherited prop- 
 erty of political privileges. It will allow the gov- 
 ernment to exercise almost tyrannical power provided 
 it violates no established forms of that Libert}, 
 " whose limbs were made in England." Its attach- 
 ment to the externals of its darling rights has a 
 gruff pugnacity and mastiff-like grip, which some- 
 times exhibit the obstinate strength of stupidity itself, 
 — a quality which Sheridan happily hit off when he 
 obJ3cted in Parliament to a tax on mile-stones, be- 
 cause, he said, " they were a race who could not 
 meet to remonstrate." So strong is its realizing fac- 
 ulty, so intensely does it live in the concrete, that it 
 forces svery national thought Into an institution
 
 180 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 Thus it found rough rebellious qualities seated deep 
 in its arrogant nature, and demanding expression. 
 These first found vent in bloody collisions with its 
 rulers, but eventually battled themselves into laws by 
 which resistance was legalized ; and thus the homely 
 but vigorous imagination of the English Mind, or- 
 ganizing by instinct, at last succeeded in the stu- 
 pendous effort of consummating the wedlock of liberty 
 and order by organizing even insurrection, and forcing 
 anarchy itself to wear the fetters of form. This, we 
 need not say, is the greatest achievement in the art 
 of politics that the world has ever seen ; and Eng- 
 land and the United States are the only nations 
 which have yet been able to perform it. Any child 
 can prattle prettily about human rights and resistance 
 to tyrants ; but to tame the wild war-horses of radical 
 passions, and compel their hot energies to subserve 
 the purposes of reason, is the work of a full-grown 
 and experienced man. 
 
 We now come to a most delicate topic, which can 
 hardly be touched without offence, or avoided with- 
 out an oversight of the most grotesque expression of 
 the English Mind. The determining sentiments nf the 
 people are to war, industry, una general individual and 
 material aggrandizement, — to things human rather 
 than *o things divine ; but every trae Englishman,
 
 THE ENGLiSH MIND. 181 
 
 oowever much of a practical Atheist he may be, feela 
 a genuine horror of infidelity, and always has a religion 
 to swear by, and, if need be, to fight for. He makea 
 it — we are speaking of the worldling — subordinate to 
 English laws and customs, Anglicizes it, and never 
 allows it to interfere with his selfish or patriotic set- 
 vice to his country, or with the gratification of hia 
 passions ; but he still believes it, and, what is more, 
 believes that he himself is one of its edifying expo- 
 nents. This gives a delicious unconscious hypocrisy 
 to the average national mind, which has long been 
 the delight and the butt of English humorists. Its 
 most startling representative was the old swearing, 
 drinking, licentious, church-and-king Cavalier, who was 
 little disposed, the historian tells us, to shape his life 
 according to the precepts of the Church, but who 
 was always "ready to fight knee-deep in blood for 
 her cathedrals and palaces, for every line of her ru- 
 bric, and every thread of her vestments." Two cen- 
 turies ;igo, Mrs. Aphra Behn described the English 
 squire as "going to church every Sunday morning, 
 to set a good example to the lower orders, and as 
 getting the parson drunk every Sunday night to show 
 lis respect for the Church." Goldsmith, in that ex 
 quisite sketch wherein ne records the comments made 
 \>y representative men uf various classes on tlw
 
 182 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 probable effects of a political measure, makes his 
 soldier rip out a tremendous oath as a pious prelim- 
 inary to the expression of his fear that the meas- 
 ure in question will ruin the Church. The cry 
 raised generally by cunning politicians, that " the 
 Church is in danger," is sure to stir all the ferocity, 
 Btupidity, and ruffianism of the nation in its support. 
 Religion in England is, in fact, a part of politics, and 
 therefore the most worldly wear its badges. Thus all 
 English warriors, statesmen, and judges are religious 
 men, but the religion is ever subordinate to the 
 profession or business in hand. " Mr. Whitefield," 
 said Lord George Sackville, condescendingly, "you 
 may preach to my soldiers, provided you say nothing 
 against the articles of war." Mr. Prime Minister 
 Pitt spends six days of the week in conducting a 
 bloody war to defend the political, and especially the 
 religious institutions of England against the diabolical 
 designs of French Atheists and Jacobins, and on 
 Sunday morning fights a duel on Wimbledon Com 
 mon. Sometimes the forms of religion are conde- 
 scendingly patronized because they are accrediced 
 marks of respectability. Percival Stockdale tells us 
 that he was appointed chaplain to a man-of-war, sta- 
 tioned at Plymouth, but found it difficult to exercise 
 his functions. He at last directly requested the cap
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 183 
 
 (Bin to allow him to read prayers. "Well," said 
 the officer, " you had better, Mr. Stockdale, begin 
 next Sunday, as I suppose this thing must be done 
 as long as Christianity is about." But perhaps the 
 quaintest example of this combination of business 
 and theology is found in that English judge, who 
 was condemning to death, under the old barbarous 
 law, a person who had forged a one-pound note. 
 Lord Campbell tells us that, after exhorting the 
 criminal to prepare for another world, he added : 
 "And I trust that, through the mediation and merits 
 of our blessed Redeemer, you may there experience 
 that mercy which a due regard to the credit of the 
 paper currency of the country forbids you to hope 
 for here." Indeed, nothing could more forcibly de- 
 monstrate how complete is the organization of the 
 English Mind than this interpenetration of the form 
 of the religious element with its most earthly aims ; 
 and therefore it is that the real piety of the nation, 
 whether ritual or evangelical, is so sturdy and active, 
 and passes so readily from Christian doctrines into 
 Christian virtues. In its best expressions it is some- 
 what local ; but what it loses in transcendent breadth 
 and elevation of sentiment it gains in practical fac- 
 ulty to perform every day duties. 
 
 We must have performed this anal f sis of the level
 
 184 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 English Mind with a shameful obtusenes;*, if we have 
 not all along indicated and implied its capacity to 
 produce and nurture great and strong men of action 
 and men of thought. It has, in truth, been singu 
 larly fertile in forcible individuals, whose character! 
 have the compound raciness of national and persona 
 peculiarity, and relish of the soil whence they sprung 
 Few of these, however cosmopolitan may have beeu 
 their manners, or comprehensive their reason, have 
 escaped the grasp of that gravitation by which the 
 great mother mind holds to her knee her most ca- 
 pricious and her most colossal children. Let us look 
 at this brood of giants in an ascending scale of in 
 tellectual precedence, fastening first on those who an 
 nearest the common heart and represent most exclu 
 sively the character of the nation's general mind 
 Foremost among these is Sir Edward Coke, thf 
 leviathan of the common law, and the sublime of 
 common sense, — a man who could have been pro 
 dnced only by the slow gestation of centuries, Eng 
 lish in bone and blood and brain. Stout as an oak 
 though capable of being yielding as a willow ; with 
 an intellect tough, fibrous, holding with a Titanic 
 clutch its enormity of acquisition ; with a disposition 
 hard arrogant, obstinate, just ; and with a heart ava- 
 ricious of wealth and power, scorning all weak an<i
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 185 
 
 most amiable emotions, but clinging, in spite of its 
 selfish fits and starts of servility, to English laws, 
 customs, and liberties, with the tenacity of mingled 
 instinct and passion ; the man looms up before us, 
 rude, ungenerous, and revengeful, as when he insulted 
 Bacon in his abasement, and roared out " spider of 
 hell" to Raleigh in his unjust impeachment, yet 
 rarely losing that stiff, daring spirit which drafted the 
 immortal " Petition of Right," and that sour and sul- 
 len honesty which told the messenger of James I., 
 who came to command him to prejudge a case in 
 which the king's prerogative was concerned, " when 
 the case happens, I shall do that which will be fit 
 for a judge to do." Less hard, equally brave, and 
 mere genial, Chief Justice Holt stands before us, 
 with his English force of understanding, sagacity of 
 insight, fidelity to facts, and fear of nothing but — 
 the tongue of Lady Holt ; wise, and with a slight 
 conceit of his wisdom ; a man who has no doubts 
 that laws should be executed and that rogues should 
 be hanged, and before the shrewd glance of whose 
 knowing eye sophism instantly dwindles, and all the 
 bubbles of fanaticism incontinently collapse. Thus he 
 once committed a blasphemous impostor by the name 
 of Atkins, who belonged to a sect, half cheats, half 
 Kulls, called " The Prophets " Ono of the hrother
 
 186 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 hood immediately waited on him and said authorita 
 lively, "I come to you, a prophet from the Lord 
 God, who has sent me to thee, and would have thee 
 grant a nolle prosequi to John Atkins, his servant, 
 whom thou hast sent to prison." Such a demand 
 might have puzzled some judges, but Holt's grim 
 humor and English sagacity darted at once to the 
 point which betrayed the falsity of the fanatic's claim. 
 '•Thou art a false prophet and lying knave," he 
 answered. "If the Lord God had sent thee, it would 
 have been to the Attorney-General, for He knows 
 that it belongeth not to the Chief Justice to grant a 
 nolle prosequi. But I, as Chief Justice, can grant 
 you a warrant to bear him company," — which, it is 
 unnecessary to add, he immediately did. The mas- 
 culine spirit of Coke and Holt is visible in all the 
 great English lawyers and magistrates, refined into a 
 graceful firmness in Hardwicke, caricatured in the 
 bluff, huffing, swearing imperiousness of Thurlow, and 
 finding in Eldon, who combined Thurlow's bigotry 
 with Hardwicke's courtesy, its latest representative. 
 
 In respect to the statesmen of England, we will 
 pass over many small, sharp, snapping minds, emi- 
 nent as red-tape officials and ministers of routine, f.nd 
 many commanding intellects and men versed in af 
 bi"-g, in order that we may the more emphasize the
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 187 
 
 name of Chatham, who, though it was said of him 
 that he knew nothing perfectly but Barrow's Sermons 
 and Spenser's Faerie Queene, is pre-eminent among 
 English statesmen for the union of the intensest na- 
 tionality with the most thoroughgoing force of imagi- 
 nation «ind grandest elevation of sentiment. Feeling 
 the glory and the might of his country throbbing in 
 every pulsation of his heroic heart, he was himself 
 the nation individualized, could wield all its resources 
 cf spirit and power, and, while in office, penetrated, 
 animated, kindled, the whole people with his own fiery 
 and invincible soul. As a statesman, he neither had 
 comprehension of understanding nor the timidity in 
 action which often accompanies it ; but, a hero and 
 a man of genius, he was fertile in great conceptions, 
 destitute of all moral fear, on fire with patriotic en- 
 thusiasm. Possessing a clear and bright vision of 
 some distant and fascinating, but seemingly inaccessi- 
 ble object, and bearing down all opposition with a 
 will as full of the heat of his genius as his concep- 
 ton was with its light, he went crashing through all 
 intervening obstacles right to his mark, and then 
 proudly pointed to his success in justification of his 
 processes. In a lower sphere of action, and with a 
 patriotism less ideal, but still glorious with the beau- 
 tiful audacity and vivii' vision of genius, is that most
 
 188 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 heroic of English naval commanders, Nelson. Bear 
 ing in his brain an original plan of attack, and 
 flashing his own soul into the roughest sailor at the 
 guns, fleet after fleet sunk or dispersed as they came 
 into collision with that indomitable valor guided by 
 that swift, sure, far-darting mind. His heroism, how- 
 ever, was pervaded through and through with the 
 vulgarest prejudices of the common English seaman. 
 His three orders to his men when he took the com 
 mand on the opening of the French war sound like 
 the voice of England herself; first, "to obey orders 
 implicitly ; second, to consider every man their enemy 
 who spoke ill of the King ; and, third, to hate a 
 Frenchman as they did the Devil." 
 
 In ascending from men eminent in action to men 
 renowned in thought, we are almost overwhelmed by 
 the thick throng of names, illustrious in scientific 
 discovery and literary creation, which crowd upon 
 the attention. Leaving out of view the mass of 
 originating genius which has been drawn into the 
 service of the nation's applying talent, in the vast 
 field of its industrial labors, what a proof of the 
 richness, depth, strength, variety, and unity of the 
 English Mind is revealed in its literature alone 
 This bears the impress of the same nationality which 
 characterizes its manners and institutions, but a
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 189 
 
 nationality more or less refined, ennobled, and ex- 
 ulted. If we observe the long line of its poets, 
 Chaucer, Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Dryden, Pope, 
 Byron, with hardly the exceptions of Spenser, Mil- 
 ton, and "Wordsworth, we shall find that, however 
 exalted, divinized, some of them may be in imagina- 
 tion and sentiment, and however palpable may be 
 the elements of thought they have assimilated directly 
 from visible nature or other literatures, they still all 
 rest on the solid base of English character, all par- 
 take of the tough English force, 
 
 " And of that fibre, quick and strong, 
 Whose throbs are love, whose thrills are song." 
 
 Though they shoot up from the level English mind 
 to almost starry heights, their feet are always firm 
 on English ground. Their ideal elevation is ever 
 significant of the tremendous breadth and vigor of 
 their actual characters. Mountain peaks that cleave 
 the air of another world, with heaven's most purple 
 glories playing on their summits, their broad founda- 
 tions are still immovably fixed on the earth. It is, 
 as the poet says of the Alps, • Earth climbing to 
 heaven." This reality of manhood gives body and 
 human interest to their loftiest ecstasies of creative 
 passion, for the superlative i* ever vitalized by the 
 positive force which urges it up, and never mimics
 
 190 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 the crazy fancy of Oriental exaggeration. When to 
 the impassioned imagination of Shakespeare's lover 
 the eyes of his mistress became "lights that do mis- 
 lead the Morn," we have a more than Oriental extrav- 
 agance ; but in the shock of sweet surprise it gives 
 our spirits there is no feeling of the unnatural or 
 the bizarre. 
 
 Observe, again, that portion of English literature 
 which relates to the truisms and the problems of 
 morality, philosophy, and religion. Now, no didactic 
 writing in the world is so parched and mechanical as 
 the English, as long as it deals dryly with gener- 
 alities ; but the moment a gush of thought comes 
 charged with the forces of character, truisms instantly 
 freshen into truths, and the page is all alive and 
 inundated with meaning. Dr. Johnson is sometimes, 
 with cruel irony, called '' the great English moralist,' 
 in which capacity he is often the most stupendously 
 tiresome of all moralizing word-pilers ; but Dr. John- 
 son, the high-churchman and Jacobite, pouring out his 
 mingled tide of reflection and prejudice, hating Whigs, 
 snarling at Milton, and saying " You lie, sir," to an 
 opponent, is as racy as Montaigne or Swift. Ascend- 
 ing higher intc the region of English philosophy, we 
 shall find that the peculiarity of the great English 
 thinker 78, that he grapples a subject, not with hit
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 191 
 
 understanding alone, but with his whole nature, ex- 
 tends the empire of the concrete into the region of 
 pure speculation, and, uulike the German and French- 
 man, builds not on abstractions, but on conceptions 
 which are o'erinformed with his individual life and 
 experience. Hobbes and Locke, in their metaphysics, 
 draw their own portraits as unmistakably as Milton 
 and Wordsworth do theirs in their poetry. This pecu- 
 liarity tends to make all English thought relative, but 
 what it loses in universality it more than gains in 
 energy, in closeness to things, and in power to kin- 
 dle thought in all minds brought within its influence. 
 The exception to this statement, as far as regards 
 universality, is found in that puzzle of critical science, 
 "Nature's darling" and marvel, Shakespeare, who, 
 while he comprehends England, is not comprehended 
 by it, but stands, in some degree, not only for Eng- 
 lish but for modern thought ; and perhaps Bacon's ca- 
 pacious and beneficent intellect, whether we consider 
 the ethical richness of its tone or the beautiful com- 
 prehensiveness of its germinating maxims, can hardly 
 be deemed, to use his own insular image, "an island 
 cut off from other men's lands, but rather a conti- 
 nent that joins to them." Still, accepting generally 
 those limitations of English thought which result from 
 its intense vitality and nationality, we are not likelj
 
 192 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 to mourn much over its relative narrowness, if we 
 place it by the side of the barren amplitude, or 
 ample barrenness, of abstract thinking. Take, for ex- 
 ample, any great logician, with his mastery of logi- 
 cal processes, and compare him with a really great 
 reasoner of the wide, conceptive genius of Hooker, or 
 Chillingworth, or Barrow, or Burke, with his mastery 
 of logical premises, and, in respect to mental enlight- 
 enment alone, do you not suppose that the clean and 
 clear, but unproductive understanding of the passion- 
 less dialectician will quickly dwindle before the mas- 
 sive nature of the creative thinker ? The fabrics of 
 reason, indeed, require not only machinery but ma- 
 terials. 
 
 As a consequence of this ready interchange of re- 
 flective and creative reason in the instinctive opera- 
 tion of the English mind, its poets are philosophers, 
 and its philosophers are poets. The old English 
 drama, from its stout beginning in Marlowe's " con 
 fcistent mightiness " and " working words," until it 
 melted in the flushed, wild-eyed voluptuousness of 
 Fletcher's fancy, and again hardened in the sensual- 
 ized sense of Wycherley's satire and the diamond 
 glitter of Congreve's wit, is all aglow with the fire 
 »ml fierceness of impassioned reason. Dryden a-gue-f 
 (n annihilating sarcasms and radiant metaphors ; Pop*
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 193 
 
 runs ethius into rhythm and epigrams. In the relig- 
 ious poets of the school of Herbert and Vaughan, 
 a curious eye is continually seen peering into the 
 dusky corners of insoluble problems, and metaphysic 
 niceties are vitally inwrought with the holy quaint- 
 ness of their meditations, and the wild-rose perfume 
 of their sentiments ; and, in the present century, the 
 knottiest problems of philosophy have come to us 
 touched and irradiated with the ethereal imaginations 
 of "Wordsworth, Shelley, and Coleridge, or shot pas- 
 sionately out from the hot heart of Byron. 
 
 But, reluctantly leaving themes which might tempt 
 to wearying digressions, we wish to add a word or 
 two respecting the mental characteristics of four men 
 who are pre-eminently the glory of the English intel- 
 lect, — Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, and Newton; 
 and if the human mind contains more wondrous fac- 
 ulties than these exhibit, we know them not. The 
 essential quality of Chaucer is the deep, penetrating, 
 Dantean intensity of his single conceptions, which go 
 right to the heart of the objects conceived, so that 
 there is an absolute contact of thought and thing 
 vithout any interval. These conceptions, however, 
 he gives in succession, not in combination ; and the 
 supreme greatness of Shakespeare's almost celestial 
 strength is seen in this, that while he conceives as 
 
 9 M
 
 194 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 intensely as Chaucer, he has the further power of 
 combining diverse conceptions into a complex whole, 
 •* vital in every part," and of flashing the marvellous 
 combination at once upon the mind in words that 
 are things. Milton does not possess this poetic com 
 prehensiveness of conception and combination ; but 
 he stands before us as perhaps the grandest and 
 mightiest individual man in literature, — a man who 
 transmuted all thoughts, passions, acquisitions, and 
 aspirations into the indestructible substance of personal 
 character. Assimilating and absorbing into his own 
 nature the spirit of English Puritanism, he starts from 
 a firm and strong, though somewhat narrow base ; but, 
 like an inverted pyramid, he broadens as he ascends, 
 and soars at last into regions so exalted and so holy 
 that his song becomes, in his own divine words, " the 
 majestic image of a high and stately drama, shutting 
 up and intermingling her solemn scenes and acts 
 with a sevenfold chorus of hallelujahs and harping 
 symphonies ! " It would not become us here to 
 speak of Newton, — although, in the exhaustless cre- 
 ativeness of his imagination, few poets have equalled 
 him, — except to note the union in his colossal char- 
 acter of boundless inventiveness with an austere Eng- 
 lish constancy to the object in view. His mind, when 
 an the trail of discovery, was infinitely fertile in the
 
 THE ENGLISH MIND. 195 
 
 most original and ingenious guesses, conjectures, and 
 hypotheses, and his life might have been barren of 
 scientific results had he yielded himself to their soft 
 fascination; but in that great, calm mind they were 
 tested and discarded with the same rapid ease that 
 marked their conception ; and the persistent Genius 
 pitched far beyond the outmost walls of positive 
 knowledge, 
 
 "Went sounding on its dim and perilous way!" 
 In these remarks on the English Mind, with their 
 insufficient analysis of incomplete examples, and the 
 result, it may be, of a most " scattering and unsure 
 observance," we have at least endeavored to follow it 
 as it creeps, and catch a vanishing view of it as it 
 Boars, without subjecting the facts of its organic life to 
 any misleading rhetorical exaggeration or embellish- 
 ment. We have attempted the description of this 
 transcendent star in the constellation of nationalities. 
 as we would describe any of those great products of 
 nature whose justification is found in their existence. 
 Yet we are painfully aware how futile is the effort 
 to sketch in a short essay characteristics which have 
 taken ten centuries of the energies of a nation to 
 evolve; but, speaking to those who know something 
 by descent and experience of the virtues and the 
 rices of the English blood, we may have hinted what
 
 [96 THE ENGLISH MIND. 
 
 we could not represent. For this proud antl praeti 
 cal, this arrogant and insular England, 
 
 " Whose shores beat back the ocean's foamy feet," 
 
 Is the august mother of nations destined to survive 
 her ; has sown, by her bigotry and rapacity, no less 
 than her enterprise, the seeds of empires all over 
 the earth ; and from the English Mind as its germ 
 has sprung our own somewhat heterogeneous but 
 rapidly organizing American Mind, worthy, as we 
 think, of its parentage, and intended, as we trust, 
 for a loftier and more comprehensive dominion; dis- 
 tinguished, unlike the English, by a mental hospital- 
 ity which eagerly receives, and a mental energy 
 which quickly assimilates, the blended life-sty earns of 
 various nationalities ; with a genius less persistent, 
 but more sensitive and flexible ; with a freedom less 
 local ; with ideas larger and more generous ; with a 
 past, it may be, less rich in memories, but with a 
 hiture more glorious in hopes.
 
 vn. 
 
 TH A CKERAY. 
 
 rililjK death of Thackeray has elicited from the 
 J- prt-ss hoth of England and the United States a 
 Beries of warm testimonials to the genius of the 
 writer and the character of the man. The majority 
 of them bear the marks of proceeding from personal 
 friends or acquaintances, and the majority of them 
 resent with special heat the imputation that the ob- 
 ject of their eulogy was, in any respect, a cynic. A 
 shrewd suspicion arises that such agreement in select- 
 ing the topic of defence indicates an uneasy conscious- 
 ness of a similar agreement, in the reading public, 
 as to the justice of the charge. If this were so, we 
 6liould think the question was settled against the 
 eulogists. As the inmost individuality of a man of 
 genius inevitably escapes in his writings, and as the 
 multitude of readers judge of him by the general 
 impression his works have left on their minds, their 
 intelligent verdict in regard to his real disposition 
 and nature carries with it more authority than the
 
 198 THACKERAY. 
 
 testimony of his chance companions. Acres of evi* 
 dence concerning the correct life and benevolent 
 feelings of Smollett and Wieland can blind no dis- 
 cerning eye to the palpate fact that sensuality and 
 misanthropy entered largely into the composition of 
 the author of "Roderick Random," and that a profound 
 disbelief in what commonly goes under the name of 
 virtue, and a delight in toying with voluptuous images, 
 characterized the historian of " Agathon." The world 
 has little to do with the outward life a man of gen- 
 ius privately leads, in comparison with the inward 
 life he universally diffuses ; and an author who con 
 trives to impress fair-minded readers that his mind 
 is tainted with cynical views of man and society, can 
 hardly pass as a genial lover of his race on the 
 Btrength of certificates that he has performed indi- 
 vidual acts of kindness and good-will. The question 
 relates to the kind of influence he exercises on those 
 he has never seen or known. What this influence 
 is, in the case of Thackeray, we by no means think 
 is expressed in so blunt and rough a term as "cyn- 
 ical," and those who use it must be aware that it 
 but coarsely conveys the notion they have of the 
 individuality of the writer they seek to characterize. 
 But clear perceptions often exist in persons who 
 lack the power, or shirk the labor, of giving exacl
 
 THACKERAY. 199 
 
 definitions ; and among the readers of Thackeray who 
 quietly take in the subtile essence of his personality, 
 there is less disagreement in their impressions than 
 in their statements. To give what seems to us a fair 
 transcript of the general feeling respecting the writer 
 and the man will be the object of the present 
 paper. 
 
 And, first, to exclude him at once from the class 
 and company of the great masters of characterization, 
 we must speak of his obvious limitations. He is 
 reported to have said of himself, that he " had no 
 head above his eyes " ; and a man who has no head 
 above his eyes is not an observer after the fashion 
 of Shakespeare, or Cervantes, or Goethe, or Scott, or 
 even of Fielding. The eye observes only what the 
 mind, the heart, and the imagination are gifted to 
 see ; and sight must be reinforced by insight before 
 eouls can be discerned as well as manners, ideas as 
 well as objects, realities and relations as well as ap- 
 pearances and accidental connections. 
 
 But, without taking an epigram of humorous self- 
 depreciation as the statement of a fact, it is still 
 plain that Thackeray was not a philosopher or a 
 poet, in the sense in which a great novelist or dram- 
 atist possesses the qualities of either. He had no 
 tonception of causes and principles, no grasp of hu«
 
 200 THACKERAY. 
 
 man nature, as distinguished from the peculiarities of 
 individuals, no perception of the invisible foundations 
 of visible things, no strictly creative power. The 
 world drifted before his eyes as his stories drift to 
 their conclusion ; and as to the meaning or purpose 
 or law of the phenomenon, he neither knew nor 
 Bought to know. This peculiar scepticism, the result 
 not of the exercise, but the absence, of philosophical 
 thought, is characteristic of the " Bohemian " view of 
 life ; and, among a certain class, whose ideal of wis- 
 dom is not so much to know as to be " knowing," 
 this ignorant indifference to principles is one of 
 Thackeray's chief claims to distinction. His philoso- 
 phy is the vanity of all things, and the enjoyment 
 of as many as you can. His superficiality in this 
 respect is evident the moment we pass to some 
 dramatist or novelist who seizes the substance of 
 human nature and human life, and represents things 
 in their vital relations, instead of in the mechanical 
 juxtaposition in which they " happen " to be observed 
 Shakespeare's plot, for example, is a combination of 
 events ; Thackeray's story, a mere procession of inci- 
 dents. Shakespeare knew woman as well as women, 
 and created Cleopatra and Cordelia ; Thackeray 
 sharply scrutinized a certain number of women, and 
 fashioned Becky Sharp and Amelia. The gulf be>
 
 THACKERAY. 201 
 
 iween tne two writers, in respect to naturalness, tc 
 a knowledge of human nature, and to individual 
 characterizations, is as wide as that which yawned 
 between Lazarus and Dives. They never can he 
 brought into the same class, without a flippant and 
 heedless oversight of the distinction between kind9 
 of genius, and of their different positions in the slid- 
 ing-scale of minds. 
 
 Connected with this lack of high thought and im- 
 agination, is a lack of great passions, and an absence 
 of sympathy with them in life. They are outside ot 
 Thackeray's world. When he touches on them, it is 
 with a fleer of incredulity: he has a suspicion ot 
 private theatricals ; he is curious to see the dressing 
 for the part ; he keeps a bright lookout to detect the 
 stage-strut in the hero's stride, and ironically encores 
 the impassioned declamation. In nothing does he 
 better succeed in taking the romance from life, than 
 in this oversight of the reality of great passions in 
 his quick penetration through all the masks of their 
 imitators. He is so bent on stripping the king's 
 robes from the limbs of the thief, that he has lost 
 the sense of kingly natures. His world is, to a 
 great extent, a world in which the grand and the 
 ooble are "left out in the cold," and the prominence 
 given to the mean md the common. He takes the 
 »*
 
 202 THACKERAY. 
 
 real heart and vitality out of mankind, calls what 
 remains by the name of human nature, and adopts 
 a theory of life which makes all history impossible, 
 • — except the " History of Pendennis." An amusing 
 illustration of this defect is observable in one of his 
 " Roundabout Papers," written during the Confederate 
 Rebellion. He had travelled all over the United 
 States with the sharpest eye that any tourist ever 
 brought with him across the Atlantic ; but he saw 
 nothing of the essential character of the people, and 
 he could not for the life of him imagine, after his 
 return, why we went to war. While North and 
 South were engaged in their fierce death-grapple, he 
 had no perception of the ideas at stake, or the pas- 
 sions in operation. He took a kindly view of both 
 parties in the contest. " How hospitable they were, 
 those Southern men!" They gave him excellent 
 claret in New Orleans. " Find me," he says, " speak- 
 ing ill of such a country ! " A Southern acquaint- 
 ance sent him a case of Medoc, just as he was 
 starting for a voyage up the Mississippi. " Where 
 are you," he exclaims, " honest friends, who gave me 
 of your kindness and your cheer? May I l>e con- 
 siderably boiled, blown up, and snagged, if I speak 
 bard words of you. May claret turn sour ere I do! 
 This may be geniality, but it is the geniality of in
 
 THACKEEAY. 203 
 
 3iffereni>e to great things. A uation in its death- 
 throes,-— one side passionately battling for the most 
 gigantic of shams as well as iniquities, — the land 
 flooded with blood, — and still the good-natured " de- 
 lineator of human nature" utterly unable to account 
 for the strange phenomena, is only sure that the 
 Southerners cannot be so bad and wrong as they 
 are represented, for did they not give him "that 
 excellent light claret"? 
 
 Another defect of Thackeray, and the consequence 
 of those we have mentioned, is the limitation of the 
 range of his observation and the comparative poverty 
 of his materials. Because he confines himself to the 
 delineation of actual life, he is sometimes absurdly 
 considered to include it, when, in fact, he only in- 
 cludes a portion, and that a relatively small portion. 
 A man may have a wide experience of the world 
 without knowing experimentally much of Thackeray's 
 world ; and those whose knowledge of the world is 
 chiefly confined to what they obtain from the novel- 
 ists of manners and society, soon learn that Thack- 
 eray's predecessors and Thackeray's contemporaries 
 contain much which Thackeray overlooks. He is 
 >nly one of a large number of observers, each with 
 a special aptitude for some particular province of 
 »<jtual life, each repairing certain deficiencies of the
 
 204 THACKERAY. 
 
 others, and all combined falling short of the immense 
 variety of the facts. In his own domain he is a 
 master, but his mastery comes from his keen and 
 original perception of what has been frequently ob- 
 served before, rather than from his discovery of a 
 new field of observation. After generalizing the 
 knowledge of life and the types of character we have 
 obtained through his writings, we find they are not 
 bo much additions to our knowledge as verifications 
 and revivals of it. The form rather than the sub- 
 stance is what is new, and the superficiality of 
 thought underlying the whole representation is often 
 painfully evident. The maxims which may be de- 
 duced from the incidents and characters would make 
 but an imperfect manual of practical wisdom. 
 
 We now come, by the method of exclusion, to the 
 positive qualities of Thackeray, and to the direction 
 and scope of his powers. Gifted originally with a 
 joyous temperament, a vigorous understanding, a 
 keen sensibility, and a decided, though somewhat in- 
 dolent self-reliance, he appears, before he came before 
 the world as a writer, to have seen through most of 
 the ordinary forms of human pretension, and to have 
 bad a considerable experience of human rascality 
 He lost a fortune in the process of learning the 
 rarious vanities, follies, and artifices he afterwards
 
 THACKERAT. 205 
 
 exposed, and thus may be considered to have fairly 
 earned the right to be their satirist. A man who 
 has been deceived by a hypocrite or cheated by a 
 rogue describes hypocrites and rogues from a sharper 
 insight, and with a keener scorn, than a man who 
 knows them only from the observation of their vic- 
 tims. Truisms brighten into truths, and hearsays into 
 certainties, under the touch of such an artist. As a 
 man's powers are determined in their direction by his 
 materials, — as what he has seen, known, and assim- 
 ilated becomes a part of his intellect and individual- 
 ity, — Thackeray obeyed the mere instinct of his 
 genius in becoming the delineator of manners and 
 the satirist of shams. The artificial — sometimes as 
 complicated with the natural, sometimes as entirely 
 overlaying it, sometimes as almost extinguishing it — 
 was the field where his powers could obtain their 
 appropriate exercise. They had indeed grown into 
 powers by the nutriment derived from it, and took 
 to their game as the duck takes to the water. From 
 the worst consequences of this perilous mental direc- 
 tion he was saved by his tenderness of heart, and 
 his love and appreciation of simple, unpretending 
 moral excellence, lie never hardened into misan- 
 thropy or soured into cynicism. Much of his repre- 
 tentntion of life is necessarily ungenial, for it is the
 
 206 THACKERAY. 
 
 representation of the selfish, the dissolute, the hard 
 hearted, and the worthless. Those who accuse him 
 of cynicism for the manner in which he depicted 
 these must expect a toleration after the fashion of 
 the Regent Duke of Orleans, " who thought," says 
 Macaulay, " that he and his fellow-creatures were 
 Yahoos," but then he thought " the Yahoo was a 
 very agreeable sort of animal." Thackeray's stand- 
 ard of human nature was not high, and his peculiar 
 talent lay in delineating specimens of it lower than 
 his own standard, but the wholesome impulses of hia 
 heart taught him when to use the lash and the 
 scourge. The general impression his individuality 
 leaves on the mind is not that of a cynic, but of a 
 Bceptic. He takes the world as he finds it; usually 
 treats of it in a tone of good-natured banter ; is 
 pleased when he can praise, and often grieved when 
 he is compelled to censure ; touches lightly, but sure- 
 ly, on follies, and only kindles into wrath at obdu- 
 rate selfishness or malignity ; hardly thinks the world 
 ran be bettered ; and dismisses it as something whose 
 ultimate purpose it is impossible to explain. He re- 
 cords that portion which passes under his own mi- 
 croscopic vision, and leaves to others the task of 
 reconciling the facts with accredited theories. 
 
 In hvs earliest works the satirist is predominant
 
 THACKERAY. 207 
 
 »ver the humorist He adopted the almost universal 
 policy of Englishmen who wish to attract public at- 
 tention, — the policy of assault. Mr. Bull can only 
 be roised into the admission of a writer's ability by 
 feeling the smart of his whip on his hide. Sydney 
 Smith, Macaulay, Carlyle, Kingsley, Ruskin, Thack 
 eray, having something to say to him, began with 
 Bhrieking out that he was a fool and a rogue ; and, 
 thus gaining his ear, proceeded to state their rea- 
 sons for so injurious an opinion, with a plentiful 
 mixture all the time of opprobrious epithets to pre- 
 vent a relapse into insensibility. This system natu 
 rally tends to make authors exaggerate things out 
 of their relations in order to give immediate effect 
 to their special view, and the habit of indiscriminate 
 issault frequently survives the necessity for its exer- 
 cise. Thackeray appears at first to have considered 
 that his business was to find fault ; to carry into lit- 
 erature the functions of the detective police ; to pry 
 into the haunts, and arrest the persons, of scoundrels 
 who evaded the ordinary operations of the law. The 
 most fashionable clubs and drawing-rooms were in- 
 raded, to catch scamps whom a common policeman 
 would have sought in low alleys and hells. The 
 successful exposer found a saturnine enjoyment in the 
 tor. fusion ana scandal which his ingeruity and per-
 
 208 THACKERAY. 
 
 tinacity wrought among " respectable " people, and his 
 taste for the sport was naturally increased by its 
 indulgence, and his success in its prosecution. He 
 contracted a morbid liking for tainted character, and 
 his sharp glance and fine scent were exercised to 
 discover the taint in characters generally sound and 
 healthy. The latent weaknesses, foibles, follies, vices, 
 of the intelligent and good became the objects of his 
 search, somewhat to the exclusion of their nobler 
 and predominant qualities, and the result was, in 
 many instances, wofully partial estimates and exhibi- 
 tions of men and women. The truth was truth only 
 from the satirist's point of view. 
 
 But all these earlier works — " The Yellowplush 
 Correspondence," " The Confessions of Fitz -Boodle." 
 " The Luck of Barry Lyndon," " Men's Wives," 
 "The Book of Snobs," not to mention others — have 
 the one merit of being readable, — a. merit which 
 Thackeray never lost. The fascination they exert 
 is in spite of the commonness of their materials. The 
 charm comes from the writer, and his mode of treat- 
 ment. The wit and the humor, so "bitter-sweet"; 
 the fine fancy and delicate observation ; the eye for 
 ludicrous situations ; the richness, raciness, and occa 
 •ional wildness of the comic vein ; the subtilty of 
 the unexpected strokes of pathos ; the perfect obedr
 
 THACKERAY. 209 
 
 ence of the style to the mind it expresses ; and the 
 continual presence of the writer himself, making him- 
 self the companion of the reader, — gossiping, hinting, 
 sneering, laughing, crying, as the narrative proceeds, 
 — combine to produce an effect which nobody, to say 
 the least, ever found dull. The grace, flexibility, and 
 easy elegance of the style are especially notable. It 
 is utterly without pretension, and partakes of the 
 absolute sincerity of the writer ; it is talk in print, 
 seemingly as simple as the most familiar private chat, 
 yet as delicate in its felicities as the most elaborate 
 composition. 
 
 In " Vanity Fair," the first novel which gave the 
 author wide celebrity, we have all the qualities we 
 have noticed cast into the frame of a story, — a story 
 which has a more connected interest and a more 
 elastic movement than its successors, though we can- 
 not think that it equals some of them in general 
 power of thought, observation, and characterization. 
 The moral, if moral it have, is that the Amelias of 
 the world, with all their simplicity and ignorance, 
 will, in the long run, succeed better than the Becky 
 Sharps, with all their evil knowledge and selfish 
 acuteness. Amelia is evidently as nnrdi the favorite 
 of the author's heart as liecky is of his brain, and 
 Vo has expended nearly as much skill in the delinea
 
 210 THACKERAY. 
 
 tion of the one as of the other. The public, how 
 ever, was prepared for the first, but the second took 
 it by surprise. It was the most original female char- 
 acter of its kind that had appeared in contemporary 
 fiction, and the raciness and never-faltering courage 
 with which the character was developed, through all 
 the phases of her career, seemed an insult to the 
 sex. " Cynic ! " cried the ladies. The truth, in this 
 case, was the cause of offence. The Sharps wisely 
 held their tongues, and left the denial of the possi- 
 bility of such a woman to those who had happily 
 never made her acquaintance. Thackeray had evi- 
 dently seen her, and seen also the Marquis of Steyne. 
 The latter represents a class of titled reprobates in 
 England and on the Continent, whom other novelists 
 have repeatedly attempted to domesticate in the do- 
 main of romance, but have failed from ignorance or 
 exaggeration. The peculiarity of the Marquis is that 
 a long life of habitual and various vice has spread a 
 thick scurf over his soul, so that he has lost by de- 
 grees all consciousness of the existence of such an 
 organ. Few felons have gone to the gallows or the 
 gibbet with such an oblivion of the immortal part of 
 than as this noble Marquis exhibits in going to his 
 daily dissoluteness and depravity. The character is 
 in some respects a horrible one, but it is probabl*
 
 THACKERAY. 211 
 
 true. Shakespeare makes Emilia wish that the " per- 
 nicious soul " of Iago " may rot half a grain a day " ; 
 and it would certainly seem that the soul may, by 
 a coufse of systematic and cynical depravity, be com- 
 pletely covered up, if it may not be gradually con- 
 sumed. 
 
 " The History of Pendennis ". has more variety 
 of character, and more minute analysis of feeling, 
 than "Vanity Fair," but the story drifts and drags. 
 Though Mrs. Pendennis and Laura rank high among 
 Thackeray's good women, his genius is specially seen 
 in Blanche Amory, a most perfect and masterly ex- 
 hibition of the union of selfishness and malice with 
 Hentimentality, resulting, as it seems to us, in a char- 
 acter more wicked and heartless than that of Becky 
 Sharp. Major Pendennis and she carry off the 
 honors of the book, — a book which, with all its 
 wealth of wit, humor, and worldly knowledge, still 
 leaves the saddest impression on the mind of all of 
 Thackeray's works. It is enjoyed while we are en- 
 gaged in reading its many-peopled pages ; the sepa- 
 rate scenes and incidents are full of matter ; but it 
 wants unity and purpose, and the wide information 
 of the superficies of life it conveys is of the kind 
 tvhich depresses rather than exhilu-ates. The gloss is 
 altogether taken both from literature and society, and
 
 212 THACKERAY. 
 
 the subtile scepticism of the author's view of life is 
 destructive of those illusions which are beneficent, as 
 well as of those delusions which are mischievous. 
 There are certain habits, prejudices, opinions, and pre- 
 conceptions, which, though they cannot stand the test 
 of relentless criticism, are still bound up with virtues, 
 and are at some periods of life the conditions both 
 of action and good action. They should be unlearned 
 by experience, if unlearned at all. To begin life 
 with a theoretical disbelief in them, is to anticipate 
 experience at the cost often of destroying ambition 
 and weakening will. Thackeray in this novel gives 
 a great deal of that sort of information which is not 
 practically so good as the ignorance of enthusiasm and 
 the error of faith. TTe assent as we read, and con- 
 giatulate ourselves on being so much more knowing 
 than our neighbors ; but at the end we find that, 
 while our eyes have been opened, the very sources 
 of volition have been touched with paralysis. 
 
 "The History of Henry Esmond" is an attempt 
 to look at the age of Queen Anne through the eyes 
 of a contemporary, and to record the result of the 
 inspection in the style of the period. It is, on the 
 whole, successful. The diction of the book is exqui- 
 site ; pleasant glimpses are given of the memorable 
 Qien of the era, — literary, political, and military
 
 THACKERAY. 213 
 
 »nd the languid pace with which the story rambles 
 to its conclusion provokes just that tranquil interest 
 with which Esmond himself recalls in memory the 
 incidents of his career. Both persons and scenes 
 have the visionary grace and remoteness which oV 
 jects take when seen through the thin and shining 
 mist of imaginative recollection. Beatrix Esmond, 
 the heroine, is another of Thackeray's studies in 
 perverted feminine character, and is worthy of the 
 delineator of Becky and Blanche. The picture of 
 the old age of this pernicious beauty, given in "The 
 Virginians/' is equally skilful and true. The defect 
 in the plot of " Henry Esmond " is obvious to every 
 reader. Lady Castlewood, whom the author intends to 
 represent as the ideal of a noble woman, loves the 
 lover of her daughter and is swayed by passions 
 and placed in situations degrading to womanhood ; 
 while Esmond himself, put forward as a high-toned 
 gentleman and chivalrous man of honor, is so demor- 
 alized by his passion for a jilt, that he enters into a 
 conspiracy to overturn the government, and involve 
 England in civil war, simply to pleas*; her, and with 
 a profound disbelief in the. cause for which he is to 
 draw his sword. The atrocious villany of such con- 
 duct, from which a Marqms o*" Steyne would have 
 recoiled, appears to Thackeray simply the weaknesi 
 ►f a noble nature.
 
 214 THACKERAY. 
 
 u The Newcoraes " is perhaps the most genial of 
 the author's works, aud the one which best exhibits 
 the maturity and the range of his powers. It seems 
 written with a pen diamond-pointed, so glittering and 
 incisive is its slightest touch. The leading idea is 
 the necessary unhappiness of marriage without mu- 
 tual love, no matter what other motive, selfish cr 
 generous, may prompt it ; and the worldly view of 
 the matter, as contrasted with the romantic, has 
 never been combated with more unanswerable force 
 than by this realist and man of the world. The 
 practical argument loses none of its power by be- 
 ing given in instances, instead of declamations or 
 syllogisms. The sincerity and conscientiousness of 
 Thackeray's mind, and the absence in him of any 
 pretension to emotions he does not feel and ideas he 
 does not believe, are very marked in this book. He 
 has the honesty of a clear-sighted and clear-headed 
 witness on the stand, stating facts as they appear to 
 him, and on the watch to escape being perjured by 
 yielding to the impulses either of amiability or mal- 
 ice. In the versatile characterization of the work, 
 two inimitable personages stand out as the best ex- 
 pression of Thackeray's heart, — Colonel Newcome 
 Biid Madame de Florae. Ethel Newcome seems to 
 as, on the whole, an ambitious failure, lacking the
 
 THACKERAY. 215 
 
 (isual vitality of the author's feminine characters, and 
 wrought out with set purpose against his grain to 
 show that he could conceive and delineate " a young 
 lady." It is hard for the reader to share Clive's 
 passion for her, for she never arrives in the book to 
 substantial personality. She brings to mind Adam, 
 in the German play, who is represented as passing 
 across the stage, " going to be created." Rosey Mac- 
 kenzie has infinitely more life. Lady Kew is a good 
 female counterpart of the Marquis of Steyne ; Ma- 
 dame d'lvry is Blanche Amory grown up ; Mrs. Mac- 
 kenzie is petty malice and selfishness personified ; 
 and all three are masterpieces in their sev,r?.l kinds. 
 Indeed, the ingenious contrivances of hui>\an beings 
 to torment each other were never better aex forth 
 than in these " Memoirs of a Respectable Fanr.ly." 
 
 We have no space to do even partial justice to 
 "The Virginians," " Lovel the Widower,'' and "The 
 Adventures of Philip." Attractive as tlwse are, they 
 furnish no specially novel illustrations of Thackeray's 
 powers, and exhibit no change in the point of ikv 
 from which he surveyed life Perhaps as he gr^w 
 older there was a more obvious desire on his pert tc 
 appear amiable. He celebrates the I indly virtues. 
 He protests aga'.ist being called a cyni» ; condescends 
 to interrupt the course of his story t/ answer petu
 
 <J16 THACKERAI. 
 
 lant criticisms petulantly ; and relaxes somewhat from 
 his manly and resolute tone. The struggle between 
 his feelings and his obstinate intellectual habit of 
 minutely inspecting defects is obvious on his page. 
 He likes good people, yet cannot help indulging in 
 a sly, mischievous cut at their faults, and then seems 
 vexed that he yields to the temptation. His humility 
 is often that of a person who tells his neighbor that 
 he is a fool and then adds. " but so are we all, more 
 or less " ; the particular fool pointed out having a dim 
 intuition that the rapid generalization at the end is 
 intended rather to indicate the wisdom of the gener- 
 alizer than his participation in the universal folly. 
 A covert insult thus lurks under his ostentatious 
 display of charity. And then in his jets of geniality 
 there is something suspicious. He condescends; he 
 slaps wn the back ; he patronizes in praising ; he is 
 benevolent from pity ; and, with a light fleer or van- 
 ishing touch of sp./^sr", he hints that it is a superior 
 intelligence thai ' 'hus disporting in the levities of 
 good-fellowship. 
 
 One thing remains to be said regarding the collec- 
 tive impression left on the mind by Thackeray's works. 
 That impression, sharply scroti. lize.l, we Jvill venture 
 to say is this, that life as ho rep'<??<;r.is it is life not 
 *orih the living. It is doub'.'.r^s rj-y / tertaining ti
 
 THACKERAY. 217 
 
 read about, and it is not without instruction ; but 
 who would wish to go through the labor and vexa- 
 tion of leading it? Who would desire to be any one 
 of the characters, good or bad, depicted in it? Who 
 would consider it: pleasures and rewards as any com- 
 pensation for its struggles, disappointments, and dis- 
 illusions ? Who, if called upon to accept existence 
 under its conditions, would not, on the whole, con- 
 sider existence a bore or a buiden, rather than a 
 blessing? This can, we think, be said of no other 
 delineator of human life and human character of equal 
 eminence ; and it points to that pervading scepticism, 
 in Thackeray's mind, which is felt to be infused into 
 the inmost substance of his works. Deficient in those 
 qualities and beliefs which convey inspiration as well 
 as information, which impart heat to the will as well 
 as light to the intellect, — lacking the insight of 
 principles and the experience ot great passions and 
 uplifting sentiments, — his representation even of the 
 actual world excludes the grand forces which really 
 animate and move it, a.id thus ignores those deeper 
 elements which give to life earnestness, purpose, and 
 glow.
 
 vm. 
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE.* 
 
 rpHE romance of "The Marble Faun" will be 
 -*- widely welcomed, not only for its intrinsic mer- 
 its, but because it is a sign that its writer, after a 
 silence of seven or eight years, has determined to 
 resume his place in the ranks of authorship. In his 
 Preface he tells us, that in each of his previous publi- 
 cations he had unconsciously one person in his eye, 
 whom he styles his " gentle reader." He meant it 
 "for that one congenial friend, more comprehensive 
 of his purposes, more appreciative of his success, 
 more indulgent of his shortcomings, and, in all re- 
 Bpects, closer and kinder than a brother, — that all- 
 sympathizing critic, in short, whom an author never 
 actually meets, but to whom he implicitly makes his 
 appeal, whenever he is conscious of having done his 
 best." He believes that this reader did once exist 
 for him, and duly received the scrolls he flung " upon 
 
 • The Marble Faun ; or the Romance of Monte Beni. By Na- 
 thaniel Hawthorne. BoHton, 1860.
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 219 
 
 whatever wind was blowing, in the faith that they 
 would find him out" " But," he questions, " is he 
 extant now? In these many years since he last 
 heard from me, may he not have deemed his earthly 
 task accomplished, and have withdrawn to the para- 
 dise of gentle readers, wherever it may be, to the 
 enjoyments of which his kindly charity on my behalf 
 must surely have entitled him ? " As, however, Haw- 
 thorne's reputation has been steadily growing with 
 the lapse of time, he has no cause to fear that the 
 longevity of his gentle reader will not equal his 
 own. 
 
 The publication of this new romance seems to offer 
 us a fitting occasion to attempt some description of 
 ihe peculiarities of the genius of which it is the lat- 
 est offspring, and to hazard some judgments on its 
 predecessors. It is more than twenty-five years since 
 Hawthorne began that remarkable series of stories 
 and essays which are now collected in the volumes 
 of "Twice -Told Tales," " The Snow Image and other 
 Tales," and " Mosses from an Old Manse." From the 
 first he was recognized, by such readers as he chanced 
 to find, as a man of genius; yet for a long time he 
 enjoyed, in his own words, the distinction of being 
 "the obscurest man of letters in America." I lis 
 readers were " gentle " rather than enthusiastic ; their
 
 220 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 fina delight in his creations was an individual per- 
 ception of subtile excellences of thought and style, 
 too refined and self-satisfying to be contagious ; and 
 the public was untouched, whilst the " gentle " reader 
 was full of placid enjoyment. Indeed, we fear that 
 this kind of reader is something of an Epicurean, 
 welcoming a new genius as a private blessing, sent 
 by a benign Providence to quicken a new life in his 
 somewhat jaded sense of intellectual pleasure ; and 
 that, after having received a fresh sensation, he is 
 apt to be serenely indifferent whether the creator of 
 it starve bodily or pine mentally from the lack of a 
 cordial human shout of recognition. 
 
 There would appear, on a slight view of the matter, 
 Co be no reason for the little notice which Hawthorne's 
 early productions received. The subjects were mostly 
 drawn from the traditions and written records of 
 New England, and gave the '• beautiful strangeness " 
 of imagination to objects, incidents, and characters 
 which were familiar facts in the popular mind. The 
 style, while it had a purity, sweetness, and grace 
 which satisfied the most fastidious and exacting 
 taste, Had, at the same time, more than the simpli- 
 city and clearness of an ordinary school-book. Hut, 
 though the subjects and the style were thus popular 
 there was something in the shaping and informing
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 221 
 
 ipirit which failed to awaken interest, or awak- 
 ened interest without exciting delight. Misanthro- 
 py, when it has its source in passion, — when it is 
 fierce, bitter, fiery, and scornful, — when it vigorous- 
 ly echoes the aggressive discontent of the world, and 
 furiously tramples on the institutions and the men, 
 luckily rather than rightfully, in the ascendant, — this 
 is always popular ; but a misanthropy which springs 
 from insight, — a misanthropy which is lounging, 
 languid, sad, and depressing, — a misanthropy which 
 remorselessly looks through cursing misanthropes and 
 chirping men of the world with the same sure, de- 
 tecting glance of reason, — a misanthropy which has 
 no fanaticism, and which casts the same ominous doubt 
 on subjectively morbid as on subjectively moral action, 
 — a misanthropy which has no respect for impulses, 
 but has a terrible perception of spiritual laws, — this 
 is a misanthropy which can expect no wide recog- 
 nition ; and it would be vain to deny that traces ot 
 this kind of misanthropy are to be found in Haw- 
 thorne's earlier, and are not altogether absent from 
 his later works. He had spiritual insight, but it did 
 not penetrate to the sources of spiritual joy ; and his 
 deepest glimpses of truth were calculated rather to 
 sadden than to inspire. A blandly sceptical distrust 
 of human nature was the result 01 his most piercing
 
 222 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 glances into the human soul. He had humor, and 
 sometimes humor of a delicious kind ; but this sun- 
 shine of the soul was but sunshine breaking through, 
 or lighting up, a sombre and ominous cloud. There 
 was also observable in his earlier stories a lack of 
 vigor, as if the power of his will had been impaired 
 by the very process which gave depth and excursive- 
 ness to his mental vision. Throughout, the impres- 
 Bion is conveyed of a shy recluse, alternately bashful 
 in disposition and bold in thought, gifted with origi- 
 nal and various capacities, but capacities which seemed 
 to have been developed in the shade. Shakespeare 
 sails moonlight the sunlight sick; and it is in some 
 Buch moonlight of the mind that the genius of Haw- 
 thorne found its first expression. A mild melan- 
 choly, sometimes deepening into gloom, sometimes 
 brightening into a " humorous sadness," characterized 
 his early creations. Like his own Hepzibah Pyn- 
 cheon, he appeared "to be walking in a dream"; or 
 rather, the life and reality assumed by his emotions 
 " made all outward occurrences unsubstantial, like 
 the teasing phantasms of an unconscious slumber." 
 Though dealing largely in description, and with the 
 most accurate perceptions of outward objects, he still, 
 to use again his own words, gives the impression 
 of a man " chiefly accustomed to look inward, and
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 223 
 
 to whom external matters are of little value 01 im- 
 port, unless they bear relation to something within 
 his own mind." But that " something within his own 
 mind" was often an unpleasant something, — perhaps 
 a ghastly occult perception of deformity and sin in 
 what appeared outwardly fair and good ; so that the 
 reader felt a secret dissatisfaction with the disposition 
 which directed the genius, even in the homage he 
 awarded to the genius itself. As psychological por- 
 traits of morbid natures, his delineations of character 
 might have given a purely intellectual satisfaction ; 
 but there was audible, to the delicate ear, a faint and 
 muffled growl of personal discontent, which showed 
 they were not mere exercises of penetrating imagi- 
 native analysis, but had in them the morbid vitality 
 of a despondent mood. 
 
 Yet, after admitting these peculiarities, nobody who 
 ia now drawn to the "Twice -Told Tales," from his 
 interest in the later romances of Hawthorne, can fail 
 to wonder a little at the limited number of readers 
 they attracted on their original publication ; for many 
 of these stories are at once a representation of early 
 New England life and a criticism of it. They have 
 much in them of the deepest truth of history. ''The 
 Legends of the Province House," ' The Gray Cham- 
 Dion," "The Gentle Boy," "The Minister's Black
 
 224 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 Veil," " Endicott and the Red Cross," not to men- 
 tion others, contain important matter which cannot 
 be found in Bancroft or even Winthrop. They ex- 
 hibit the inward struggles of New England men and 
 women with some of the darkest problems of exist- 
 ence, and have more vital import to thoughtful 
 minds than the records of Indian or Revolutionary 
 warfare. In the " Prophetic Pictui-es," " Fancy's 
 Show-Box," "The Great Carbuncle," "The Haunted 
 Mind," and " Edward Fane's Rose-Bud," there are 
 flashes of moral insight, which light up, for the mo- 
 ment, the darkest recesses of the individual mind ; 
 and few sermons reach to the depth of thought and 
 sentiment from which these seemingly airy sketches 
 draw their sombre life. It is common, for instance, 
 for religious moralists to insist on the great spiritual 
 truth, that wicked thoughts and impulses, which cir- 
 cumstances prevent from passing into wicked acts, 
 are still deeds in the sight of God ; but the living 
 truth subsides into a dead truism, as enforced by 
 commonplace preachers. In " Fancy's Show-Box," 
 Hawthorne seizes the prolific idea ; and the respecta- 
 ble merchant and respected church-member, in the 
 B.ill hour of his owl meditations, convicts himself of 
 being a liar, cheat, thief, seducer, and murderer, a? 
 Ue casts his glance over the mental events which form
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 225 
 
 {us spiritual biography. Interspersed with serious 
 histories and moralities like these are others which 
 embody the sweet and playful, though still thought- 
 ful and slightly saturnine action of Hawthorne's mind, 
 — like " The Seven Vagabonds," " Snow-Flakes," 
 " The Lily's Quest," " Mr. Higgenbotham's Catastro- 
 phe," " Little Annie's Ramble," " Sights from a 
 Steeple," " Sunday at Home," and " A Rill from the 
 Town-Pump." 
 
 The " Mosses from an Old Manse " are intellectu- 
 ally and artistically much superior to the " Twice- 
 Told Tales." The twenty-three stories and essays 
 which make up the volumes are almost perfect of 
 their kind. Each is complete in itself, and many 
 might be expanded into long romances by the simple 
 method of developing the possibilities of their shad- 
 owy types of character into appropriate incidents. 
 In description, narration, allegory, humor, reason 
 fancy, subtilty, inventiveness, they exceed the best 
 productions of Addison ; but they want Addison's 
 sensuous contentment, and sweet and kindly spirit. 
 Thougli the author denies that he has exhibited his 
 own individual attributes in these " Mosses," though 
 he professes not to he "one of those supremely hos- 
 pitable people who serve up their own hearts deli 
 rately fried, with brain-sauce, as a titbit for theii 
 10* o
 
 226 NATHANIEL HA.WTHORNE. 
 
 beloved public," — yet it is none the less apparent 
 that he has diffused through each tale and sketch 
 the life of the mental mood to which it owed ita 
 existence, and that one individuality pervades and 
 colors the whole collection. The defect of the seri- 
 ous stories is, that character is introduced, not as 
 thinking, but as the illustration of thought. The 
 persons are ghostly, with a sad lack of flesh and 
 blood. They are phantasmal symbols of a medita- 
 tive and imaginative analysis of human passions and 
 aspirations. The dialogue, especially, is bookish, 
 as though the personages knew their speech was to 
 be printed, and were careful of the collocation and 
 cadence of their words. The author throughout is 
 evidently more interested in his large, wide, deep, 
 indolently serene, and lazily sure and critical view 
 of the conflict of ideas and passions, than he is with 
 the individuals who embody them. lie shows moral 
 insight without moral earnestness. lie cannot con- 
 tract his mind to the patient delineation of a moral 
 individual, but attempts to use individuals in order 
 to express the last results of patient moral pcrcep 
 tion. Young Goodman Brown and Roger Malvin 
 are not persons ; they are the mere loose, persona/ 
 expression of subtile thinking. " The Celestial Rail 
 road," " The Procession of Life." " Earth's Holocaust,
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE 227 
 
 "The Bosom Serpent," indicate thought of a charac- 
 ter equally deep, delicate, and comprehensive ; but 
 the characters are ghosts of men rather than sub- 
 stantial individualities. In the " Mosses from an Old 
 Manse," we are really studying the phenomena of 
 human nature, while, for the time, we beguile our- 
 selves into the belief that we are following the for 
 tunes of individual natures. 
 
 Up to this time, the writings of Hawthorne con- 
 veyed the impression of a genius in which insight 
 bo dominated over impulse that it was rather men- 
 tally and morally curious than mentally and morally 
 impassioned. The quality evidently wanting to its 
 full expression was intensity. In the romance of 
 " The Scarlet Letter " he first made his genius effi- 
 cient by penetrating it with passion. This book 
 forced itself into attention by its inherent power ; 
 and the author's name, previously known only to a 
 limited circle of readers, suddenly became a familiar 
 word in the mouths of the great reading public of 
 America and England. It may be said that it " cap- 
 tivated " nobody, but took everybody captive. Its 
 power could neither be denied nor resisted. There 
 were growls of disapprobation from novel-reader- that 
 Hester Prynne and the Rev. Mr. Dimmesdale were 
 wbjected to cruel punishments unknown to the juris-
 
 228 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 prudence of fiction, — that the author was an inquis 
 itor who put his victims on the rack, — and that 
 neither amusement nor delight resulted from seeing 
 the contortions and hearing the groans of these mar- 
 tyrs of sin ; but the fact was no less plain that Haw- 
 thorne had for once compelled the most superficial 
 lovers of romance to submit themselves to the magic 
 of his genius. The readers of Dickens voted him, 
 with three times three, to the presidency of their 
 republic of letters ; the readers of Hawthorne were 
 caught by a coup d'etat, and fretfully submitted to a 
 despot whom they could not depose. 
 
 The success of " The Scarlet Letter " is an exam- 
 ple of the advantage which an author gains by the 
 simple concentration of his powers on one absorbing 
 Bubject. In the " Twice -Told Tales" and the " Moss- 
 es from an Old Manse " Hawthorne had exhibited a 
 wider range of sight and insight than in " The Scar- 
 let Letter." Indeed, in the little sketch of " Endi 
 cott and the Red Cross," written twenty years before, 
 he had included in a few sentences the whole matter 
 which lie afterwards treated in his famous story. In 
 describing the various inhabitants of an early New 
 England town, as far as they were representative, 
 he touched incidentally on a " young woman, with 
 no mean share of beauty, who^e doom it was to
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 229 
 
 wear the letter A on the breast of her gown, in the 
 eyes of all the world and her own children. And 
 even her own children knew what that initial signi- 
 fied. Sporting with her infamy, the lost and desper- 
 ate creature had embroidered the fatal token in scarlet 
 cloth, with golden thread and the nicest art of needle- 
 work ; so that the capital A might have been thought 
 to mean Admirable, or anything, rather than Adul- 
 teress." Here is the germ of the whole pathos and 
 terror of " The Scarlet Letter " ; but it is hardly 
 noted in the throng of symbols, equally pertinent, in 
 the few pages of the little sketch from which we 
 have quoted. 
 
 Two characteristics of Hawthorne's genius stand 
 plainly out in the conduct and characterization of the 
 romance of " The Scarlet Letter," which were less 
 obviously prominent in his previous works. The 
 first relates to his subordination of external incidents 
 to inward events. Mr. James's " solitary horseman " 
 does more in one chapter than Hawthorne's hero in 
 twenty chapters ; but then James deals with the 
 tirrns of men, while Hawthorne deals with their souls. 
 Hawthorne relies almost entirely for the interest of 
 his story on what is fe\t and done within the minds 
 of his characters. Even his most picturesque descrip- 
 Kons and narratives are only one tenth matter to
 
 230 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 nine tenth3 spirit. The results that follow from one 
 external act of folly or crime are to him enough for 
 an Iliad of woes. It might be supposed that his 
 whole theory of Romantic Art was based on these 
 tremendous lines of Wordsworth : — 
 
 "Action is momentary, — 
 The motion of a muscle, this way or that : 
 Suffering is long, obscure, and infinite." 
 
 The second characteristic of his genius is con- 
 nected with the first. With his insight of individual 
 60uls he combines a far deeper insight of the spirit- 
 ual laws which govern the strangest aberrations of 
 individual souls. But it seems to us that his mental 
 eye, keen-sighted and far-sighted as it is, overlooks 
 the merciful modifications of the austere code whose 
 pitiless action it so clearly discerns. In his long and 
 patient brooding over the spiritual phenomena of 
 Puritan life, it is apparent, to the least critical ob- 
 server, that he has imbibed a deep personal antip- 
 athy to the Puritanic ideal of character ; but it is no 
 less apparent that his intellect and imagination have 
 been strangely fascinated by the Puritanic idea of jus- 
 tice. His brain has been subtly infected by the Puri- 
 tanic perception of Law, without being warmed by 
 the Puritanic faith in Grace. Individually, he would 
 arvueh prefer to have been one of his own " Seven
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 231 
 
 Vagabonds" rather than one of the austerest preach- 
 ers of the primitive church of New England ; but the 
 austerest preacher of the primitive church of New Eng- 
 land would have been more tender and considerate 
 to a real Mr. Dimmesdale and a real Hester Prynne 
 than this modern romancer has been to their typical 
 representatives in the world of imagination. Through- 
 out " The Scarlet Letter " we seem to be following 
 the guidance of an author who is personally good- 
 natured, hut intellectually and morally relentless. 
 
 " The House of the Seven Gables," Hawthorne's 
 next work, while it has less concentration of passion 
 and tension of mind than " The Scarlet Letter," in- 
 cludes a wider range of observation, reflection, and 
 character ; and the morality, dreadful as fate, which 
 hung like a black cloud over the personages of the 
 previous story, is exhibited in more relief. Although 
 the book has no imaginative creation equal to little 
 Pearl, it still contains numerous examples of char- 
 acterization at once delicate and deep. Clifford, es- 
 pecially, is a study in psychology, as well as a 
 marvellously subtile delineation of enfeebled man- 
 hood. The general idea of the story is this, — 
 "that the wrong-doing of one generation lives into 
 the successive ones, and, divesting itself of every 
 temporary advantage, becomes a pure aud uncontrcl-
 
 232 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 Iable mischief" ; and the mode in which this idea is 
 carried out shows great force, fertility, and refine- 
 ment of mind. A weird fancy, sporting with the 
 facts detected by a keen observation, gives to every 
 gable of the Seven Gables, every room in the House, 
 every burdock growing rankly before the door, a sym- 
 bolic significance. The queer mansion is haunted, — 
 haunted with thoughts which every moment are lia- 
 ble to take ghostly shape. All the Pyncheons whc 
 have resided in it appear to have infected the very 
 timbers and walls with the spiritual essence of their 
 lives, and each seems ready to pass from a memory 
 into a presence. The stern theory of the author 
 regarding the hereditary transmission of family qual- 
 ities, and the visiting of the sins of the fathers on 
 the heads of their children, almost wins our reluc- 
 tant assent through the pertinacity w T ith which the 
 generations of the Pyncheon race are made not 
 merely to live in the blood and brain of their de- 
 scendants, but to cling to their old abiding-place on 
 earth, so that to inhabit the house is to breathe 
 the Pyncheon soul and assimilate the Pyncheon in- 
 dividuality. The whole representation, masterly aa 
 it is, considered as an effort of intellectral and im 
 aginative power, would still be morally bleak, were it 
 not for the sunshine and warmth radiated from the
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 283 
 
 character of Phoebe. In this delightful creation, 
 Hawthorne for once gives himself up to homely 
 human nature, and has succeeded in delineating a 
 New England girl, cheerful, blooming, practical, affec- 
 tionate, efficient, full of innocence and happiness, 
 with all the " handiness " and native sagacity of her 
 class, and so true and close to nature that the 
 process by which she is slightly idealized is com- 
 pletely hidden. 
 
 In this romance there is also more humor than in 
 any of his other works. It peeps out, even in the 
 most serious passages, in a kind of demure rebellion 
 against the fanaticism of his remorseless intelligence. 
 In the description of the Pyncheon poultry, which 
 we think unexcelled by anything in Dickens for 
 quaintly fanciful humor, the author seems to indulge 
 in a sort of parody of his own doctrine of the he- 
 reditary transmission of family qualities. At any 
 rate, that strutting chanticleer, with his two meagre 
 wives and one wizened chicken, is a sly side fleer 
 at the tragic aspect of the law of descent. Miss 
 Hepzibah Pyncheon, her shop, and her customers, 
 are so delightful, that the reader would willingly 
 spare a good deal of Clifford and Judge Pyncheon 
 and Holgrave, for more details of them and Phoebe. 
 Uncle Venner, also, the old wood-sawyer, who boasti
 
 234 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 "that he has seen a good deal of the world, not only 
 in people's kitchens and back-yards, but at the street- 
 corners, and on the wharves, and in other places 
 where his business " called him, and who, on the 
 strength of this comprehensive experience, feels qual- 
 ified to give the final decision in every case which 
 tasks the resources of human wisdom, is a very 
 much more humane and interesting gentleman than 
 the Judge. Indeed, one cannot but regret that Haw- 
 thorne should be so economical of his undoubted 
 stores of humor, and that, in the two romances he 
 has since written, humor, in the form of character, 
 does not appear at all. 
 
 Before proceeding to the consideration of " The 
 Blithedale Romance," it is necessary to say a few 
 words on the seeming separation of Hawthorne's ge- 
 nius from his will. He has none of that ability 
 which enabled Scott and enables Dickens to force 
 their powers into action, and to make what was 
 legun in drudgery soon assume the character of 
 inspiration. Hawthorne cannot thus use his genius ; 
 his genius always uses him. This is so true, that 
 he often succeeds better in what calls forth his per 
 Bonal antipathies than in what calls forth his pen 
 konal sympathies. His Life of General Pierce, foi 
 instance, is altogether destitute of life ; yet in writ
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 235 
 
 Big it he must have exerted himself to the utmost! 
 ta his object was to urge the claims of an old and 
 dear friend to the Presidency of the Republic The 
 ityle, of course, is excellent, as it is impossible for 
 Hawthorne to write bad English ; but the genius of 
 the man has deserted him. General Pierce, whom 
 he loves, he draws so feebly, that one doubts, while 
 reading the biography, if such a man exists; Hol- 
 lingsworth, whom he hates, is so vividly character- 
 ized, that the doubt is, while we read the romance, 
 vhether such a man can possibly be fictitious. 
 
 Midway between such a work as the " Life of 
 General Pierce " and " The Scarlet Letter " may be 
 placed "The "Wonder-Book" and "Tangle wood Tales." 
 In these Hawthorne's genius distinctly appears, and 
 appears in its most lovable, though not in its deepest 
 form. These delicious stories, founded on the my- 
 thology of Greece, were written for children, but 
 they delight men and women as well. Hawthorne 
 never pleases grown people so much as when he 
 writes with an eye to the enjoyment of little people. 
 
 Now " The Blithedale Romance " is far from be- 
 ing so pleasing a performance as " Tanglewood Tales," 
 yet it very much better illustrates the operation, in- 
 dicates the quality, and expresses the power, of the 
 tuthor's genius. His great books appear not so
 
 £36 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 much created by him as through him. They have 
 the character of revelations, — he, the instrument, be- 
 ing often troubled with the burden they impose on 
 his mind. His profoundest glances into individual 
 bouIs are like the marvels of clairvoyance. It would 
 Beem, that, in the production of such a work as 
 " The Blithedale Romance," his mind had hit acci- 
 dentally, as it were, on an idea or fact mysteriously 
 related to some morbid sentiment in the inmost core 
 of his nature, and to numerous scattered observations 
 of human life, lying unrelated in his imagination. 
 In a sort of meditative dream, his intellect drifts iu 
 the direction to which the subject points, broods pa- 
 tiently over it, looks at it, looks into it, and at last 
 looks through it to the law by which it is governed. 
 Gradually, individual beings, definite in spiritual qual- 
 ity, but shadowy in substantial form, group them- 
 Belves around this central conception, and by degrees 
 assume an outward body and expression correspond- 
 ing to their internal nature. On the depth and in- 
 tensity of the mental mood, the force of the fascina- 
 tion it exerts over him, and the length of time it 
 holds him captive, depend the solidity and substance 
 of the individual characterizations. In this way Miles 
 Coverdale, Ilollingsworth, Westervelt, Zenobia, and 
 Priscilla become real persons to the mind which ha»
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 237 
 
 railed them into being. He knows every secret and 
 watches every motion of their souls, yet is, in a 
 measure, independent of them, and pretends to no 
 authority by which he can alter the destiny which 
 consigns them to misery or happiness. They drift 
 to their doom by the same law by which they drifted 
 across the path of his vision. Individually, he abhors 
 Hollingsworth, and would like to annihilate Wester- 
 velt, yet he allows the superb Zenobia to be their 
 victim ; and if his readers object that the effect of 
 the whole representation is painful, he will doubtless 
 agree with them, but sorrowfully confess his incapaci- 
 ty honestly to alter a sentence. He professes to 
 tell the story as it was revealed to him ; and the 
 license in which a romancer might indulge is denied 
 to a biographer of spirits. Show him a fallacy in 
 his logic of passion and character, point out a false 
 or defective step in his analysis, and he will gladly 
 alter the whole to your satisfaction ; but four humap 
 souls, such as he has described, being given, their 
 mutual attractions and repulsions will end, he feels 
 assured, in just such a catastrophe as he has stated. 
 Eight years have passed since "The Blithedale 
 Romance " was written, and during nearly the whole 
 of this period Hawthorne has resided abroad. " The 
 Marble Faun," which must, on the whole, be coo-
 
 238 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 Bidered the greatest of his works, proves that his 
 genius has widened and deepened in this interval 
 without any alteration or modification of its charac 
 teristic merits and characteristic defects. The mosi 
 obvious excellence of the work is the vivid truthful 
 ness of its descriptions of Italian life, manners, and 
 scenery ; and, considered merely as a record of a 
 tour in Italy, it is of great interest and attractive- 
 ness. The opinions on Art, and the special criti- 
 cisms on the masterpieces of architecture, sculpture, 
 and painting, also possess a value of their own. The 
 story might have been told, and the characters fully 
 represented, in one third of the space devoted to 
 them, yet description and narration are so artfully 
 combined that each assists to give interest to the 
 other. Hawthorne is one of those true observers 
 who concentrate in observation every power of their 
 minds. He has accurate sight and piercing insight. 
 When he modifies either the form or the spirit of 
 tne objects he describes, he does it either by viewing 
 them through the medium of an imagined mind or 
 by obeying associations which they themselves sug- 
 gest. We might quote from the descriptive portions 
 of the work a hundred pages, at least, which would 
 demonstrate how closely accurate observation is con- 
 nected with the highest powers of the intellect and 
 imagination.
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 239 
 
 The style of the book is perfect of its kir.d, and, if 
 H&wthorne had written nothing else, would entitle him 
 to rank among the great masters of English composi- 
 tion. Walter Savage Landor is reported to have said 
 of an author whom he knew in his youth, * My friend 
 wrote excellent English, a language now obsolete." 
 Had " The Marble Faun " appeared before he uttered 
 this sarcasm, the wit of the remark would have been 
 pointless. Hawthorne not only writes English, but the 
 Bweetest, simplest, and clearest English that ever has 
 been made the vehicle of equal depth, variety, and 
 subtilty of thought and emotion. His mind is re- 
 flected in his style, as a face is reflected in a mir- 
 ror ; and the latter does not give back its image 
 with less appearance of effort than the former. His 
 excellence consists not so much in using common 
 words as in making common words express uncom 
 mon things. Swift, Addison, Goldsmith, not to men 
 tion others, wrote with as much simplicity ; but the 
 style of neither embodies an individuality so com 
 plex, passions so strange and intense, sentiments so 
 fantastic and preternatural, thoughts so profound and 
 delicate, and imaginations so remote from the recog- 
 nized limits of the ideal, as find an orderly outlet in 
 the pure English of Hawthorne. He has hardly a 
 Word to which Mrs. Trimmer would primly object,
 
 HO NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 \ardly a sentence which would call forth the frosty 
 nathema of Blair, Hurd, Karnes, or Whately, and 
 yet he contrives to embody in his simple style qual- 
 ities which would almost excuse the verbal extrava- 
 gances of Carlyle. 
 
 In regard to the characterization and plot of " The 
 Marble Faun," there is room for widely varying 
 opinions. Hilda, Miriam, and Donatello will be 
 generally received as superior in power and depth 
 to any of Hawthorne's previous creations of charac- 
 ter; Donatello, especially, must be considered one of 
 the most original and exquisite conceptions in the 
 wbole range of romance ; but the story in which 
 they appear will seem to many an unsolved puzzle, 
 and even the tolerant and interpretative "gentle 
 reader" will be troubled with the unsatisfactory con- 
 clusion. It is justifiable for a romancer to sting the 
 curiosity of his readers with a mystery, Only on the 
 implied obligation to explain it at last ; but this story 
 begins in mystery only to end in mist. The sugges- 
 tive faculty is tormented rather than genially excited, 
 and in the end is left a prey to doubts. The cen- 
 tral idea of the story, the necessity of sin to convert 
 such a creature as Donatello into a moral being, is 
 not happily illustrated in the leading event. When 
 Donatello kills the wretch who malignantly dogs tha
 
 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 241 
 
 Iteps of Miriam, all readers think that Donatello 
 committed no sin at all ; and the reason is, that 
 Hawthorne has deprived the persecutor of Miriam 
 of all human attributes, made him an allegorical rep- 
 resentation of one of the most fiendish forms of un- 
 mixed evil, so that we welcome his destruction with 
 something of the same feeling with which, in follow* 
 ing the allegory of Spenser or Bunyan, we rejoice 
 in the hero's victory over the Blatant Beast or Gi- 
 ant Despair. Conceding, however, that Donatello's 
 act was murder, and not "justifiable homicide," we 
 are still not sure that the author's conception of his 
 nature and of the change caused in his nature by 
 that act, are carried out with a felicity correspond- 
 ing to the original conception. 
 
 In the first volume, and in the early part of the 
 second, the author's hold on his design is compara- 
 tively firm, but it somewhat relaxes as he proceeds, 
 and in the end it seems almost to escape from his 
 grasp. Few can be satisfied with the concluding 
 chapters, for the reason that nothing is really con- 
 cluded. We are willing to follow the ingenious pro- 
 cesses of Calhoun's deductive logic, because we are 
 •ure, that, however severely they task the faculty 
 of attention, they will lead to some positive result ; 
 but Hawthorne's logic of events leaves us in the end 
 11 r
 
 242 NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. 
 
 bewildered in a labyrinth of guesses. The book is, 
 on the whole, such a great book, that its defects 
 felt with all the more force. 
 
 In this rapid glance at some of the peculiarities 
 of Hawthorne's genius, we have not, of course, been 
 able to do full justice to the special merits of tho 
 works passed in review ; but we trust that we have 
 Baid nothing which would convey the impression that 
 we do not place them among the most remarkable 
 romances produced in an age in which romance-writ- 
 ing has called forth some of the highest powers of 
 the human mind. In intellect and imagination, in 
 the faculty of discerning spirits and detecting laws, 
 we doubt if any living novelist is his equal ; but his 
 genius, in its creative action, has been heretofore 
 attracted to the dark rather than the bright side of 
 the interior life of humanity, and the geniality which 
 evidently is in him has rarely found adequate ex- 
 pression. In the many works which he may still be 
 expected to write, it is to be hoped that his mind 
 will lose some of its sadness of tone without losing 
 any of its subtilty and depth ; but, in any event, it 
 would be unjust to deny that he has already don« 
 enough to insure him a commanding position in 
 American literature as long as American literature 
 kas an existence.
 
 IX. 
 
 EDWARD EVERETT. • 
 
 IT is certainly fit, gentlemen, that the pensfr of 
 bereavement which this city and the whole na- 
 tion have felt in the death of Mr. Everett should 
 find emphatic expression in the Club of which hr 
 was the honored President. Known to every mem- 
 ber as the most exquisitely affable of presiding offi- 
 cers ; a chairman with the gracious and graceful 
 manners of a host ; ever ready to listen as to speak ; 
 and masking the eminence, which all were glad to 
 acknowledge, in that bland and benignant courtesy, 
 of which all were made to feel the charm, — hif 
 presence gave a peculiar dignity to our meetings, 
 which it will be impossible to replace and impressed 
 on all of us the conviction, that to his other gifts 
 and accomplishments must be added the distinction 
 of having been the most accomplished gentleman of 
 his time. Indeed, it is probable, that, in this quality 
 
 • Read before the Thursday Evenirg Club, at its meeting on 
 bonnry 26, 1866.
 
 244: EDWARD EVERETT. 
 
 of high-bred and inbred courtesy, which we iM have 
 luch good cauoe to admire and to remember, may be 
 found the explanation and justification of some things 
 in his character and cur^r whicli have been sub 
 jected to adverse and acrimonious criticism ; and, in 
 the few remarks I propose to rnake, allow me to 
 throw into relations to this felicity of his nature, 
 the powers and achievements which have made him 
 so widely famous, and, what is better, so widely 
 mourned. 
 
 Mr. Everett was born with that fineness of men 
 tal and of bodily organization, the sensitiveness of 
 which is hardly yet thoroughly tolerated by the 
 world which still profits by its superiorities. There 
 was refinement in the very substance of his being 
 by a necessity of his constitution he disposed every- 
 thing he perceived into some orderly relations to 
 ideas of dignity and grace; he instinctively shunned 
 what was coarse, discordant, uncomely, unbecoming ; 
 and that internal world of thoughts, sentiments, and 
 dispositions, which each man forms or re-forms for 
 himself, and in which he really lives, in his case 
 obeyed the law of comeliness, and came out as 
 uaturally in his manners as in his writings, in the 
 beautiful urbanity of his behavior, as iu the cadencei 
 periods of his eloquence. The fascination of thin
 
 EDWARD EVERETT. 245 
 
 must have been felt even in his childhood, for he 
 was an orator whose infant prattle attracted an au- 
 dience ; and he may be said to have passed from the 
 cradle into public life. To a swiftness and accuracy 
 of apprehension which made study the most delight- 
 ful and self-rewarding of tasks, he added a general 
 brightness, vigor and poise of faculties, which gave 
 premature promise of the reflection and judgment 
 which were to come. By some sure instinct, the 
 friends who seemed combined in a kindly conspiracy 
 to assist and to spoil him, must have felt that they 
 had to do with a nature whose innate modesty was 
 its protection from conceit, and whose ambition to 
 excel was but one form of its ambition for excel- 
 lence. The fact to be considered is, that, in child- 
 hood and in youth as in manhood and age, there was 
 something in him which irresistibly attracted admi- 
 ration and esteem, and made men desirous of help- 
 ing him on in the path his genius chose, and to the 
 goal from which his destiny beckoned. 
 
 It will be impossible here to do more than indi- 
 cate the steps of that comprehensive career, so full 
 of distinction for himself, so full of benefit for the 
 nation, which has been for the past ten days the 
 theme of so many eulogies: — the college student, 
 bearing away the highest honors of his class ; the
 
 246 EDWARD EVERETT. 
 
 boy-preacher, whose pulpit eloquence alternately ki* 
 died and melted men of maturest years ; the Greek 
 Professor, whose knowledge of the finest and most 
 flexible instrument of human thought extorted the 
 admiration of the most accomplished of all the trans- 
 lators of Plato ; the fertile Writer and wide-ranging 
 Critic, whose familiarity with many languages only 
 added to the energy and elegance with which he 
 wielded the resources of his own ; the Representative 
 of Middlesex, whose mastery of the minutest details 
 of political business was not more evident than his 
 ready grasp of the broader principles of political 
 science ; the Governor of Massachusetts, whose wise 
 and able administration gave a new impulse to the 
 cause of education and to some of the most impor- 
 tant of the arts of peace ; the Ambassador, who co- 
 operated with his friend, the great Secretary, in 
 converting the provocations to what would have 
 been one of the most calamitous of all wars into the 
 occasion for negotiating one of the most beneficent 
 <»f all treaties ; the President of Harvard, bringing 
 back to his Alma Mater the culture he had received 
 from her increased an hundred-fold, and presenting 
 to the students the noble example of a scholarship 
 which was always teaching, and therefore always 
 Earning ; the Secretary of State, whose brief posses
 
 EDWARD EVERETT. 247 
 
 Hon of office was yet sufficient to show with what 
 firmness of purpose he could uphold American honor 
 and with what prodigality of information he could 
 expound American rights ; the Orator of all " occa- 
 sions," scattering through many years, and from a 
 hundred platforms, the rich stores of his varied 
 knowledge, the ripe results of his large experience, 
 and the animating inspirations of his fervid soul ; 
 the Patriot, who ever made his scholarship, states- 
 manship, and eloquence serviceable and subsidiary to 
 the interest and glory of his country, and who, when 
 would-be parricides lifted their daggers to stab the 
 august mother who had borne them, flung himself, 
 with a grand superiority to party prejudices, and a 
 brave disdain of consequences to himself, into the 
 great current of impassioned purpose which surged 
 up from the nation's heroic heart ; the Christian phi- 
 lanthropist, who, through a long life, had been the 
 object of no insult or wrong which could rouse in 
 him the fierce desire for vengeance, and whose last 
 public effort was a magnanimous plea for that " re- 
 taliation " which Christianity both allows and enjoins : 
 — all these claims to honor, all this multiform and 
 multiplied activity, have been the subjects of eagei 
 Bnd emulous panegyric ; and little has been ever 
 tacked \n the loving and grateful survey.
 
 248 EDWARD EVERETT. 
 
 Such a career implies the most assiduous self-cul 
 ture ; but it was a culture free from the fault ot 
 intellectual selfishness, for it was not centred in 
 itself, but pursued with a view to the public service 
 and the thirst for acquisition was not stronger than 
 the ardor for communication. Such a career also 
 implies a constant state of preparation for public 
 duties ; but only by those whose ambition is to get 
 office, rather than to get qualified for office, will this 
 peculiarity be sneeringly imputed to a love of dis- 
 play. Still, the vast publicity which such a career 
 rendered inevitable would have developed in him 
 some of the malignant, or some of the frivolous, vices 
 of public life, had it not been that a fine modesty 
 tempered his constant sense of personal efficiency, — 
 had it not been that a certain shyness at the core 
 of his being made it impossible that his self-reliance 
 should rush rudely out in any of the brazen forms 
 of self-assertion. And this brings me back to that 
 essential gentlemanliness of nature, which penetrated 
 every faculty, and lent its tone to every expression, 
 of our departed President. This gave him a most 
 lensitive regard for the rights and feelings of others, 
 and this made him instinctively expect the same 
 regard for his own. He guarded with an almosf 
 jealous vigilance the reserves of his individuality
 
 EDWARD EVERETT. 249 
 
 ftnd resented all uncouth or unwarranted intrusion 
 into these sanctuaries which his dignity shielded, 
 with a feeling of grieved surprise. In his wide con- 
 verse with men, even in the contentions of party, 
 bis mind ever moved in a certain ideal region of 
 mutual courtesy and respect. It was to be antici 
 patedj that, in the rough game of politics, where 
 blows are commonly given and received with equal 
 carelessness, and where mutual charges of dishonesty 
 are both expected and unheeded, such a nature as 
 Mr. Everett's should sometimes suffer exquisite pain ; 
 that his nerves should quiver in impatient disgust of 
 such odious publicity ; that he should be tempted al 
 times to feel that the inconsiderate assailers of hia 
 character — 
 
 " Made it seem more sweet to be 
 The little life of bank and brier. 
 The bird that pipes his lone desire, 
 And dies unheard within his tree, 
 
 " Than he who warbles long find loud, 
 And drops at Glory's temple-gates ; 
 For whom the carrion-vulture wait9 
 To tear his heart before the crowd ! " 
 
 In this sensitiveness, refinement, and courtesy of 
 nature, in this chivalrous respect for other minds 
 »nd tenderness for other hearts, 's to be found thf
 
 250 EDWARD EVERETT. 
 
 peculiarity of his oratory. He was the last great 
 master of persuasive eloquence. The circumstances 
 of the time have given to our public speaking an 
 aggressive and denouncing character, and invective 
 has contemptuously cast persuasion aside, and almost 
 reduced it to the condition of one of the lost arts. 
 This is undoubtedly a great evil, for invective com- 
 monly dispenses with insight, is impotent to interpret 
 what it assails, and fits the tongue of mediocrity as 
 readily as that of genius. It is true that the might- 
 iest exemplars of eloquence have been those who 
 have wielded this most terrific weapon in the armory 
 of the orator with the most overwhelming effect. 
 Demosthenes, Chatham, Burke, Mirabeau, men of 
 vivid minds, hot hearts, and audacious wills, have 
 made themselves the terror of the assemblies they 
 ruled, by their power of uttering those brief and 
 Ireadful invectives, which " appall the guilty and 
 make bold the free," — which come like the light- 
 ning, irradiating for an instant what in an instant 
 they blast. Perhaps the noblest spectacle in the 
 unnals of eloquence is that in which the mute rage 
 and despair of a hundred millions of Asiatics found, 
 in the assembly responsible for their oppression, fiery 
 utterance from the intrepid lips of Burke. But such 
 men are rightly examples only to their peers ; a
 
 EDWARD EVERETT. 251 
 
 certain autocracy of nature is the animating prin- 
 ciple of their genius ; and, when they are copied sim- 
 ply by the tongue, they are likely to produce shrews 
 rather than sages. Mr. Everett followed the bent 
 of his character and the law of ha mind when he 
 aimed to enter into genial relations with hia auditors, 
 and to associate the reception of his views with a 
 quickening of their better feelings, and an addition to 
 their self-respect Mount Vernon, the poor of East 
 Tennessee, the poor of Savannah, attest that his 
 greatest triumphs were those of persuasion. And in 
 recalling the tones of that melodious voice, whose 
 words were thus works, one is tempted to think 
 that Force, in eloquence, is the mailed giant of the 
 leudal age, who, assailing under a storm of missiles 
 the fortress of his adversary, makes the tough gates 
 Bhiver under the furiously rapid strokes of his battle- 
 axe, and enters as a victor ; while Persuasion, " with 
 his garland and singing robes about him," speaks 
 the magical word which makes the gates fly open of 
 their own accord, and enters as a guest. 
 
 It is but just, gentlemen, that our lamented Presi- 
 tent, the. source of. so many eurogies, should now be 
 their theme ; that his joy in recognizing eminency 
 ui others should be met by a glad and universal
 
 252 EDWARD EVERETT. 
 
 recognition of 't in himself. And, certainty, that 
 spotless private and distinguished public life could 
 have closed at no period when the heart of the 
 whole loyal nation was more eager to admire the 
 genius of the orator, and sound the praises of the pa- 
 triot, and laud the virtues of the man, than on the 
 day when his mortal frame, beautiful in life, and 
 beautiful in death, was followed by that long pro- 
 cession of bereaved citizens, through those mourning 
 streets, to that consecrated grave !
 
 X. 
 
 THOMAS STARR KING.* 
 
 I CANNOT doubt that all of you, friends and 
 parishioners of Thomas Starr King, have felt 
 how difficult it is to speak in detail of the qualities 
 of him, the mere mention of whose name so quickly 
 brings up his presence in all its gracious and genial 
 power, and his nature in all its exquisite harmony. 
 He comes to us always as a person, and not as an 
 assemblage of qualities ; and however precious may 
 be the memory of particular traits of mind or disposi- 
 tion, they refuse to be described in general terms, 
 but are all felt to be excellent and lovable, because 
 expressive of him. Others may attract us through 
 .be splendor of some special faculty, or the eminency 
 of some special virtue, but in his case it is the whole 
 individual we admire and love, and the faculty takes 
 •ts peculiar character, the virtue acquires its subtile 
 tharra, because considered as an outgrowth of the 
 
 • Address at the Msmorial Service at Hollis Street Church, Bo* 
 too, on Sunday evening, April 3, 1864.
 
 254 THOMAS STARR KING. 
 
 beautiful, beneficent, and bounteous nature in which 
 it had its root. 
 
 And here, I think, we touch the source of his in- 
 fluence and the secret of » ts power, as friend, pastor, 
 preacher, writer, patriot, and — let me add — states 
 man. He had the rare felicity, in everything he said 
 and did, of communicating himself, — the most pre- 
 cious thing he could bestow ; and he so bound others 
 to him by this occupation of their hearts, that to love 
 him was to love a second self. This communication 
 was as unmistakable in his lightest talk with a 
 chance companion, as in that strong hold on masses 
 of men, and power of lifting them up to the height 
 of his own thought and purpose, which, in the case 
 of California, will give his name a position among 
 the moral founders of states. Everybody he met he 
 unconsciously enriched ; everywhere he went he in- 
 stinctively organized. Meanness, envy, malice, big- 
 otry, avarice, hatred, low views of public and private 
 duty, all bad passions and paltry expediencies, slunk 
 away abashed from every mind which felt the light 
 and heat of that sun-like nature, stealing or stream- 
 ing into it. Such evil spirits could not live in such 
 ft rebuking presence, whether it came in the form 
 of wit, or tenderness, or argument, or admonition, of 
 exhilarating appeal, or soul-animating eloquence. Ev
 
 THOMAS STARR KINO. 255 
 
 «rybody was more generous from contact with that 
 radiating beneficence ; everybody caught the contagion 
 of that cheerful spirit of humanity ; everybody felt 
 grateful to that genial exorcist, who drove the devils 
 of selfishness and pride from the heart, and softly 
 ensconced himself in their vacated seats. The won- 
 der is, not that he raised so much for benevolent 
 purposes, but that he did not make a complete sweep 
 of all the pockets which opened so obediently to his 
 winning appeal. Rights of property, however jeal- 
 ously guarded against others, were felt to be imper- 
 tinent towards him ; his presence outvalued everything 
 in the room he gladdened with his beaming face , 
 people were pleasingly tormented with a desire to 
 give him something ; for giving was so emphatically 
 the law of his own being, he was so joyously disin- 
 terested himself, that, in his company, avarice itself 
 Baw the ridiculous incongruity of its greed, and, with 
 a grim smile, suffered its clutch on its cherished 
 hoards to relax. 
 
 And this thorough good nature had nothing of the 
 weakness, nothing of the cant, nothing or the fear of 
 giving offence, nothing of the self-^onnciousness, noth 
 ing of the bending and begging air of professional 
 benevolence, but was as erect and resolute as it was 
 wholesome and sweet. It seemed the effect of the
 
 256 THOMAS STARR KINO. 
 
 native vigor as well as the native kindliness of jit 
 cordial and opulent soul. It never cloyed with its 
 amiability. It did not insult the poor with conde- 
 scension, or court the rich with servility, but took its 
 place on an easy equality and fraternity with all, 
 without the pretence of being the inferior of any. 
 While he was too manly to ape humility, the mere 
 idea of setting himself up as " a superior being " 
 would have drawn from him one of those bursts of 
 uncontrollable merriment, happy as childhood's and 
 as innocent, which will linger in the ears of friends 
 who often heard that glad music, until the grave 
 closes over them as it has over him. 
 
 The expression of this nature through the intellect 
 was as free from obstruction as through morals and 
 manners. His mind, like his heart, was open on all 
 sides. Clear, bright, eager, rapid, and joyous ; with 
 observation, memory, reason, imagination, in full play ; 
 with a glance quick to detect the ludicrous as well 
 as tne beautiful ; and with an analogical power, both 
 in the region of fancy and understanding, of remark- 
 able vivacity and brilliancy ; his intellect early fast- 
 ened on facts and on principles with the delight of 
 impulse rather than the effort of attention and will. 
 In swiftness and. exactness of perception, both o» 
 ideas and of theii relations, he was a marvel fron
 
 THOMAS STARR KING. 257 
 
 his boyhood. Grasping with such ease, and assimi- 
 lating with such readiness, the nutriment of thought, 
 he made mind faster than others receive impressions. 
 His faculties palpably grew day by day, increasing 
 their force and enlarging their scope with every fresh 
 and new perception of nature and books and men. 
 He tasted continually the deep joy of constant men- 
 tal activity. Who shall measure the happiness of 
 that exhilarating sense of daily increase of knowl- 
 edge and development of power ? — the sweet sur- 
 prise of swift-springing thoughts from never-failing 
 fountains, ■— the glow and elation of soul as objects 
 poured in from without, and ideas streamed out from 
 within ! His mind, as independent as it was recep- 
 tive, and as free from self-distrust as from presump- 
 tion, never lost its balance as it sensitively quivered 
 nnder the various knowledge that went thronging 
 into it; for there was the judgment to dispose as 
 wed as the passion to know, and the sacred hunger 
 for new truth and beauty never degenerated into 
 that ignoble gluttony which paralyzes the action of 
 the mind it overfeeds. 
 
 There is something glorious in the contemplation 
 of a youth passed in such constant, such happy, such 
 »elf-rewarding toil. He nad a natural aptitude for 
 large ideas and deep sentiments. His mind caught
 
 258 THOMAS STARE KING. 
 
 at laws immersed in bewildering details, — darted to 
 the salient points and delved to the central princi- 
 ples of controverted questions, — and absorbed systems 
 of philosophy as hilariously as others devour story- 
 books. The dauntless boy grappled with such 
 themes as Plato and Goethe, and wrote about them 
 with a prematureness of scholarship, a delicacy of 
 discernment, a sweet, innocent combination of confi- 
 dence and diffidence, which were inexpressibly charm- 
 ing. Throughout his career, in sermon and in 
 lecture, this strong tendency to view everything 
 in its principles was always prominent ; and as a 
 popularizer of ideas removed from ordinary appre- 
 hension, — secreted, indeed, from general view in 
 the jargon of metaphysics, — he was, perhaps, with- 
 out an equal in the country. 
 
 It is hardly possible to say what this mind might 
 not have grown to be, had not the drain on its en- 
 ergies begun almost as early as the unfolding of its 
 faculties, — had not the dissipation of power nearly 
 kept pace with its accumulation. His time, talent, 
 and sympathies were the property of all they de- 
 lighted and benefited. The public seized on him at 
 an early age, and did not loosen its grasp until 
 within a few days of his death. His parish was nol 
 » ofined to this society, but overed the ever-enlarg
 
 THOMAS STARR KING. 259 
 
 ing circle of his acquaintances and audiences. The 
 demands, accordingly, on that fertile brain and boun- 
 teous heart were constant and endless. We were 
 always after him to write, to preach, to lecture, to 
 converse ; we plotted lovingly against his leisure ; 
 and as long as there was a bit of life in him, we 
 claimed it with all the indiscriminate eagerness of 
 exacting affection. As soon as a thought sprouted 
 in his head, we insisted on having it ; and we were 
 all in a friendly conspiracy to prevent his exercise 
 of that patient, concentrated, uninterrupted thinking, 
 which conducts to the heights of intellectual power. 
 
 Perhaps his elastic mind might have stood this 
 drain ; but the mind is braced by the emotional forces 
 which underlie it ; and it was on these that his 
 friends delighted to feed. His sympathetic nature 
 attracted towards him the craving for sympathy in 
 others ; and nothing draws more on the very sources 
 of vitality, mental and moral, than this assumption 
 of the sorrows, disappointments, heart-breaks, and mis- 
 eries of others, this incessant giving out of the very 
 capital and reserve fund of existence, to meet the 
 demands for sympathy. I have sometimes seen him 
 physically an^ morally fatigued and exhausted from 
 this over-exertion of brain and heart, and have won- 
 iered why, if each found it so hard to bear his oun
 
 260 THOMAS STARR KING. 
 
 burdens in silence, we did not consider the cruelty 
 of casting the burdens of all, in one mountainous 
 load, upon him. 
 
 When we remember this immense readiness to give, 
 this admission of the claims of misfortune and trou- 
 ble to take out patent rights on his time and sym- 
 pathy, it is astonishing how much, intellectually, he 
 achieved. This was owing not more to the fine qual- 
 ity of his intellect than to its mode of action, for 
 deep down in the very centre of his being was the 
 element of beauty, and this unceasingly strove to 
 mould all he thought and did into its own likeness. 
 It was not only expressed in fancy and imagination, 
 in the richness of his imagery and the cadence of his 
 periods, and in that peculiar combination of softness 
 and fire which lent to his eloquence its persuasive 
 power, but it gave luminousness to his arrangement, 
 method to his scholarship, consecutiveness to his ar- 
 gumentation, symmetry to his moral life. It abridged 
 as well as decorated his work. Things that went into 
 his mind huddled and confused, hastened to fall into 
 their right relations, and harmoniously adjust them- 
 selves to some definite plan and purpose, as soon as 
 Lhey felt the disposing touch of that artistic intelli- 
 gence, to which all disorder was unbecoming as wel. 
 as unsystematic. This quality of beauty, an elemeiM
 
 THOMAS STARR KING. 261 
 
 of his character as well as a shaping faculty of hia 
 mind, demanded symmetry in all things, — symmetry 
 of form in things imaginative, symmetry of law in 
 things intellectual, symmetry of life in things moral 
 The besetting sins of the head and the heart ap- 
 peared to him uncomely as well as wrong, and he 
 avoided them through an instinctive love of the good 
 and the fair. As much of our intellectual and moral 
 effort is spent in removing obstacles and overcoming 
 temptations, and as from this weary work he was in 
 a great measure spared, the time saved was so many 
 year3 added to his life. 
 
 But it must be added, that this pervading senti- 
 ment of the beautiful did not make him one of those 
 bigots of the ideal, whom the deformities of practical 
 life keep in a morbid state of constant moral or men 
 tal irritation. From the fret of this fine fanaticism, 
 which always weakens the character it seemingly 
 adorns, he was preserved by his exquisite, his deli 
 cious sense of the ludicrous. The deformed, when 
 his eye sparkled upon it, hastened to change into the 
 grotesque ; it acquired, indeed, a quaint beauty of its 
 own ; it irritated, not his nerves, but his risibilities ; 
 it slid into his loving neart, — always open to things 
 human, — and was there nursed and cherished on the 
 lunnieat mirth and laughter that humorous object
 
 262 THOMAS STARR KING. 
 
 ever fed upon. For the morally deformed his whole 
 being had an instinctive repugnance ; but when him- 
 self the mark at which meanness or malice aimed, he 
 always seemed to me rather amused than exasper- 
 ated. The oddity of the meanness, the strange futility 
 of the malice, affected him like a practical joke ; 
 quick as lightning to detect the base thing, he still 
 dismissed it laughingly from his mind, with hardly 
 the appearance of having suffered wrong, and certain- 
 ly without any desire or intention to retaliate. No 
 wound could fester in that humane and healthy soul. 
 The love of the beautiful, to which I have referred 
 as so strong an element in his nature, was, as it re- 
 gards natural scenery, most completely embodied in 
 his eloquent book on the White Hills, — which will 
 look the sadder to us now that the loving chronicler 
 of their varying aspects- of grandeur and grace, who 
 has associated his own name with every valley and 
 peak, will visit them no more ; but when his ser- 
 mons and lectures are published, it will be seen how 
 closely the beautiful in nature was linked in his 
 mind with the beautiful in thought, in character, and 
 in action. He loved his theological calling, and it 
 was his ambition to pay the debt which every able 
 man is said to owe his profession, namely, to contrib- 
 ute some worn of permanent value to its literature.
 
 THOMAS STARR KINO. 263 
 
 J lad he lived, he would, I think, have written the 
 most original, the most interpretative, and the most 
 attractive of all books on the life, character, and 
 apistles of the Apostle Paul. But it was ordered 
 that his life should be chiefly spent in direct actior 
 on men through speech and personal influence ; and 
 theology may well wait for the book, when human- 
 ity had such pressing need for the man. 
 
 I hardly know how to speak of his moral and 
 spiritual qualities ; for, noble as they were, they were 
 not detached from his mind, but pervaded it. Both 
 as a thinker and as a reformer he was brave almost 
 to audacity; but his courage was tempered by an ad- 
 mirable discretion and sense of the becoming, and 
 his quick self-recovery from a mistake or error was 
 •iot one of the least of his gift<. He seemed to have 
 do fear, not even the subtlest form which fear as- 
 sumes in our day, — the fear of being thought afraid. 
 No supercilious taunt, or imputation of timidity, could 
 sting him into going further in liberal theology and 
 reforming politics than his own intelligence and con- 
 science carried hiin. Malignity was a spiritual vice 
 >f which I have sometimes doubted if he had even 
 the mental perception. His charity and toleration 
 vere as wide as his knowledge of men. Controversy 
 ras a gymnastic in wnich he delighted to f"Hce hii
 
 264 THOMAS STARR KINO. 
 
 faculties, but he could look at disputed questions 
 from the point of view of his opponents, discrimi- 
 nate between dogmas and the holders of them, ana 
 assail opinions without unwittingly defaming charac- 
 ter. "Speaking the truth in love," was a text which 
 he seemed born to illustrate ; and if, as a theologian, 
 he did not perceive the moral evil of the world in 
 all its ghastliness, it was because its most hateful 
 forms stole away when he appeared, and, addressing 
 what was good in men, the good went gladly out 
 to him in return. His piety, pure, deep, tender, se- 
 rene, and warm, took hold of the positive principles 
 of light and beneficence, not of the negative ones of 
 darkness and depravity, and — himself a child of tho 
 light — he preached the religion of spiritual joy. 
 
 The rarity of such a character, and the wide in- 
 fluence it was calculated to exert in virtue of ita 
 native qualities, were only seen in all their beauty 
 and might when he went from us to California, and 
 we looked at him from afar. In four years he con- 
 densed the work of forty. The very genius of or- 
 ganization seemed to wait upon his steps. Men 
 Hocked to him as to a natural benefactor. As a 
 clergyman, he built up the strongest church in the 
 State, with an income the largest of any in the land. 
 &s a philanthropist, he raised for the most beneficent
 
 TH0MA3 STARR KING. 265 
 
 at all charities the most munificent of all subscrip- 
 tions. As a patriotic Christian statesman, he includ- 
 ed the real elements of power in the community, 
 took the people out of tub hands of disloyal politi- 
 cians, lifted them up to the level of his own ardent 
 soul, and not only saved the State to the Union, but 
 imprinted his own generous and magnanimous spirit 
 on its forming life. In the full speed of this victo- 
 rious career, with the blessings of a nation raining 
 upon him, he was arrested by death, — the rich and 
 abounding life suddenly summoned to the Source of 
 Life, and " happy to go." Human willingness could 
 hardly answer the Divine Will with more perfect 
 submission ; and it is not for us, who remember with 
 what a shock of inexpressible grief and pain that un 
 expected departure smote the hearts of kindred and 
 friends, but who also remember how often from this 
 pulpit, and from his lips, we have been taught that 
 the purpose of Providence in sending death is always 
 beneficent, to doubt that the stroke, so heavy to us, 
 so " happy " to him, was prompted by wisdom and 
 love. Bowing before that transcendent mystery, and 
 not seeking to penetrate it, let us (hid consolation in 
 the faith that this child of the light has been caught 
 up into the Light Ineftable, — that this preacher of the 
 "eligion of joy has entered into the joy of his Lord. 
 
 19
 
 XL 
 
 AGASSIZ.* 
 
 NO thoughtful person can have watched the ten- 
 dencies of scientific thinking, for the last twenty 
 or thirty years, without being impressed with its bear- 
 ings on Natural Theology and the Philosophy of the 
 Mind. A large class of scientific men, eminent for 
 their powers of observation and understanding, but 
 deficient in the more subtile and profound elements 
 of mind which mark the philosophic thinker, have 
 undoubtedly evinced in their speculations a strong 
 leaning to Materialism, in what may be considered 
 its worst form, namely, the doctrine that organized 
 beings owe their origin to merely physical agents. 
 The intellectual defect of these savans is a seeming 
 incapacity to comprehend, appreciate, and feel the 
 necessity of the fertile idea of Cause. For this they 
 substitute the abstraction of Law, without a distinct 
 impression of the meaning of the term, for law im 
 plies a power that legislates. It is no cause, buJ 
 
 • E»say on Classification, 1867.
 
 agassiz. 267 
 
 only the mode in which a cause operates ; " not action, 
 but a rule of action." The distinguishing character- 
 istic of a mind of the second class is its content 
 with that explanation of a problem which is one or 
 two removes from its centre and heart. It has no 
 fine, detecting sense of the real thing to be investi- 
 gated, explained, or affirmed. Too sceptical to admit 
 the validity of that mental instinct, that gravitation to 
 tfie truth, which conducts to solid and intelligent be- 
 lief, they are credulous enough in giving omnipotence 
 to the lifeless notion of law, if by so doing they can 
 escape from the living conception of cause. The in- 
 troduction of the idea of God is to them not only a 
 fallacy but an affront, and throws them into a state 
 of intellectual irritation which is not favorable to the 
 fair consideration of the facts and arguments which 
 make such an introduction necessary. 
 
 But the defect is not merely intellectual. It is 
 also personal, and has one of its roots in the most 
 refined form of vanity and pride. Everybody is 
 familiar with the subjectivity and self-assertion of 
 poets. We are not surprised when Do.nte makes 
 himself the lord of the next world, and plunges his 
 enemies into hell, with the full faith that there cud 
 be no disagreement between the Deity and himself 
 is to their guilt or mode of punishment We are
 
 268 AGASSIZ. 
 
 not surprised when Byron colors all nature with the 
 hues of his own spirit, forces natural objects into 
 Bymbols of his own caprices of disgust or desperation, 
 and views mankind as limited to Byron -kind. But 
 we are hardly prepared to suspect that men engaged 
 in a scientific scrutiny of material existences evei 
 project their own nature on what th«y observe, or 
 are tempted to make their own mindu the measure 
 of things. Yet this is, in many cases, the truth. A 
 clear objective perception of facts, and the laws and 
 principles which inhere in facts, is a moral, no less 
 than a mental quality. It implies a purification of 
 the character from egotism and prida of opinion, a 
 rare union of humility of feeling with a dacity of 
 thought, and, above all, the triumph o»* a f- acere love 
 of objective truth over the desire to er dt a subjec- 
 tive self. The moment a scientific m*tfi begins to 
 bluster about his discoveries, and c**.l them ' my 
 truth," it is all over with him. Me has given 
 pledges to the strongest of all selfisk principles that 
 he will see Nature hereafter only a» Nature squares 
 with his theory, and feeds his self^ .nportance. Es- 
 pecially, if he calls his notion Law , and makes law 
 an ultimate, beyond which the bun an reason cannot 
 go, he feels as if he were the crec ar of that which 
 he has, perhaps, only imperfectly observed. In hi*
 
 AGASSIZ. 260 
 
 ^age opinion it is the folly of superstition to admit 
 '.he necessity of God, but he sees no impropriety 
 in the apotheosis of his darling notion ; and, accord- 
 ingly, he quietly expels God from the universe, ano 
 puts himself in His place. He does it as unmistak 
 ably, though not as coarsely and obviously, as the 
 religious fanatic, who projects a deity from his malig- 
 nant passions, and then insists on his being worshipped 
 by all mankind. The temptation to substitute self 
 — either in its emotional, or imaginative, or reason- 
 ing expression — for objective truth is a temptation 
 which is not confined to any one class of powerful 
 natures, but operates on all ; and men of science 
 have their full share of the infirmity. 
 
 We have been led into these remarks by reading 
 the long introductory Essay on Classification, in the 
 first volume of Mr. Agassiz's " Contributions to the 
 Natural History of North America," — a work of 
 the first importance, if we merely consider its posi- 
 tive additions to our knowledge of Natural History ; 
 but especially interesting to us for the felicity and 
 jower with which it deals with the higher philoso- 
 phy of the science, and the superiority of the author 
 to the besetting mental sins W3 have indicated. In 
 Uie " Essay on Classification," the first of living nat 
 Uralists oroves himself also to be among the first of
 
 270 AGASSIZ. 
 
 living thinkers in the department of natural theology 
 Its publication we cannot but think to be no mere 
 incident in the progress of science, but an event 
 It would seem to impose on every naturalist the 
 duty of agreeing with Mr. Agassiz or of refuting 
 him. No man of any scientific reputation can here- 
 after bring forward the development theory, or the 
 theory that animal life can be produced by the nat- 
 ural operation of physical agents, or the theory that 
 God is an obsolete idea in science, or the theory 
 that things were not created but occurred, without 
 harmonizing his theory with Mr. Agassiz's facts, and 
 grappling with Mr. Agassiz's ideas. The essay will 
 also do much to correct the anarchy of thought 
 which prevails among many naturalists, who, being 
 observers rather than thinkers, have confused notions 
 of the real problems to be decided, are sometimes 
 on one side of an important question, sometimes on 
 another, with an imperfect comprehension of the vital 
 points at issue ; and who need nothing 60 much as 
 the assistance of a master-mind, to draw a definite 
 line between the two opposing systems, and to indi- 
 cate the consequences of each. 
 
 There can be no doubt of the right of Mr. Agas« 
 b.z to speak with authority on the philosophy of his 
 icienoe ; for he has fairly earned the right to speak
 
 AGASSIZ. 271 
 
 ty labor, by study, by the most extensive investiga- 
 tions, by patient and continuous thought. The whole 
 immense subject of natural history, in itself and in 
 its literature, is reflected in the clear and compre- 
 hensive mirror of his mind. He knows facts, and 
 the relations of facts, so thoroughly, that he can 
 wield them with ease as elements of the profoundest 
 philosophical reasoning. The breadth of his view 
 preserves him from the vice of detaching classes of 
 facts from their relations, emphasizing them into 
 undue importance, and severing the fine cord of 
 connection which gives them their real significance. 
 By the instinct of his intelligence he looks at every- 
 thing, not as isolated, but as related, and consequent- 
 ly he is not content with facts, but searches for the 
 principles which give coherence to facts. As an ob- 
 server, he is both rapid and accurate. He possesses 
 not merely the talent of observation, but its genius ; 
 tnd hence his ability to perform the enormous tasks 
 which he imposes on his industry. His mind is 
 eminently large, sound, fertile, conscientious, and sa- 
 gacious, quick and deep in its insight, wide in the 
 range of its argumentation, capable equally of the 
 trinutest microscopic, scrutiny and the broadest gen- 
 eralizations, independent of schools and systems, and 
 inspired by that grand and ennobling love of truth
 
 272 AGASSIZ. 
 
 which is serenely superior to fear, interest, vanity 
 ambition, or the desire of display. In the operation 
 of his mind there is no predominance of any single 
 power, but the intellectual action of what we feel to 
 be a powerful nature. When he observes, his whole 
 mind enters into the act of observation, just as when 
 he reasons, his whole mind enters into the act of 
 reasoning. This unity of the man in each intellect- 
 ual operation gives to his statements and arguments 
 the character of depositions under oath. His personal 
 honor is pledged for his accuracy, and his works are 
 therefore free from those lies of the brain whic^i 
 spring from narrow thought, confused perceptions 
 and hasty generalizations. Though in decided oppo- 
 sition to many eminent naturalists, he, in common 
 with all lovers of truth, has none of the fretful dis- 
 putativeness of polemics ; and while he calmly and 
 clearly controverts antagonistic theories, he exhibits 
 nothing of the disputatious spirit. 
 
 The " Essay on Classification," the reading of which 
 has occasioned these general observations on the char- 
 acteristics of Mr. Agassiz as a scientific thinker, is 
 addressed to all minds that reflect, and not merely 
 to the professed naturalist. In the general reader, its 
 perusal will be likely to produce something of that 
 wonder and awe which his first introduction to th*
 
 AGASSIZ. 273 
 
 marvels of astronomy infused into his mind. And 
 first, Mr. Agassiz takes the ground, that the divisions 
 of the animal kingdom according to type, class, or- 
 der, family, genus, and species are not convenient 
 devices of the human understanding to classify its 
 knowledge, but were instituted by God as the cate- 
 gories of His thinking. There is a systematic ar- 
 rangement in nature which science did not invent, 
 but gradually discovered. The terms in which this 
 arrangement is expressed are the translation into 
 human language of the thoughts of the Creator. 
 The plan of creation, so far from growing out of 
 the necessary action of natural laws, betrays in ev 
 ery part, to the profound student, the signs of hav- 
 ing been the free conception of the Divine Intellect, 
 matured in His mind before it was manifested in 
 external forms. The existence of a plan involves 
 premeditation prior to the act which carried the plan 
 into execution ; and if, through all the various stages 
 of the physical history of the globe, this plan of an- 
 imal creation has never been departed from, we are 
 tompelled to see in it the marks of thought and fore- 
 thought, of intelligent purpose and unity of design. 
 Now the researches of Cuvier, who classified animals 
 according to their structure, and of Von Baer, who 
 classified them according to their development, have 
 
 12* B
 
 274 AGASSIZ. 
 
 sbown that the animal kingdom exhibits four pri 
 mary divisions, the representatives of which are or- 
 ganized upon four different plans of structure, and 
 grow up according to four different modes of devel- 
 opment. As regards living animals, at no period do 
 the types pass into each other. The type of each 
 animal is defined from the beginning, and controls 
 the whole development. The embryo of the verte- 
 brate is a vertebrate from the beginning, and does 
 not exhibit at any time a correspondence with the 
 invertebrates. In regard to extinct species the same 
 principle holds good. Within thirty years it was cus- 
 tomary for geologists and palaeontologists to assert 
 that the lowest animals first made their appearance 
 on the earth, and that these were followed by higher 
 and higher types, until the series was closed by man. 
 Now it is well known that representatives of the 
 four types of animals existed simultaneously in the 
 earliest geological periods. All naturalists now agree 
 that there was no priority in time of the appearance 
 of radiata, mollusks, and articulata ; and if some still 
 ntend that vertebrata originated later than the oth- 
 eis, it is still conceded that they appeared before the 
 tnd of the first great epoch in the history of the 
 globe. It is curious how this great principle of type 
 tonfrols the animal kingdom. Many facts, at first
 
 AGASSIZ. 275 
 
 considered favorable to the notion that animal life 
 was originated by the physical conditions and sur- 
 roundings of its existence, have been turned against 
 the theory by bringing in this fertile idea. Thus the 
 blind fish in the Mammoth Cave of Kentucky has 
 been cited as indicating that physical conditions de- 
 termine the absence or presence of organs. But the 
 discovery of a rudimentary eye in this fish proves 
 that, in its creation, the plan of structure of the type 
 to which it belongs was followed, though the organ 
 was of no use. Indeed, the connection between or- 
 gans and functions, which in most works on natural 
 theology is emphasized as the great proof of causal 
 and intelligent force, is not universally true. Organs 
 without functions are among the ascertained facts of 
 zoology. The whale has teeth which never cut 
 through the gum. The males of mammalia have 
 breasts which are never used. Pinnated animals 
 have fingers which are never moved. Why is this? 
 The reason is, that these organs, though not neces- 
 sary to the mode of existence of the animals, are 
 retained because they relate to the fundamental char- 
 acteristics of their class. " The organ remains, not 
 for the performance of a function, but with reference 
 to a plan " ; as in architecture the same external 
 combinations which mark the style to which a build-
 
 276 AGASSIZ. 
 
 ing belongs are often retained for the sake of sym- 
 raetry and harmony of proportion, when they serve 
 no practical object. 
 
 Now here is a great fact, true not only as regards 
 living animals, but in respect to fossil species of for 
 mer geological epochs, which carry the mind back 
 into an incalculable remoteness of time, — the fact, 
 namely, that all organized beings were made on four 
 different plans of structure. These are types, ideas. 
 The question is, Can we discriminate between these 
 types and the classes in which the four plans of 
 structure are carried out in actual organizations ? 
 If we can thus discriminate, we of course lift the 
 question out of matter into mind. We pass from 
 organization to the Thought and Will that organ- 
 ized. In all matters under human control we are 
 accustomed to take this step. At whatever point we 
 view a fact or event, we trace it back through all 
 the stages of its progress to the invisible thought 
 which contrived it, and the invisible will that bade 
 it be. We never hesitate, when we discern a plan 
 carried practically out in human affairs, to give the 
 plan a previous ideal existence in the mind of its 
 human originator. If we should reason in piactical 
 affairs, as some naturalists reason in regard to tho 
 origin of organized beings, we should insist that no
 
 AGASSIZ. 277 
 
 oae had the logical right to pass, beyond the steam- 
 engine, which is a plan carried out, to the mind of 
 James "Watt, where it previously existed in idea. 
 
 Now Mr. Agassiz has demonstrated that all ani« 
 mals, both of living and extinct species, which have 
 come under the notice of naturalists, exhibit the 
 marks of these four plans of structure, and of no 
 more, however infinitely diversified they may be in 
 their details of structure. The number of existing 
 Bpecies is at least two hundred and fifty thousand, 
 with innumerable living representatives ; and there is 
 every reason to suppose that the number of extinct 
 species is at least as great. Thus, from the begin- 
 ning, through geological epochs which rival in time* 
 the marvels of astronomy in space, and under all the 
 physical conditions and changes of the planet, we 
 »erceive four ideas controlling the structure of r\] 
 :rganized beings. Leaving out of view the difficulty 
 of supposing that physical elements should possess 
 creative intelligence to originate animal life, we may 
 still ask, without profanity, Where, in Heaven's name, 
 did they get the memory ? lt\ each epoch they 
 would have been compelled to create anew, for the 
 previous animals had left no living representative to 
 hint the secret of their structure to the wild ele- 
 mental philosophers who were called upon to extern
 
 278 AGASSIZ. 
 
 porize animal life after the old plans. They would 
 have been compelled to recollect the mode in which 
 they did it in the elder time. What is this but a 
 misuse of terms, — a wilful naming of one thing by 
 thb appellation of another, — a projection of qualities 
 characteristic of intelligent forces, upon forces which 
 Rre unintelligent and necessitated? 
 
 Mr. Agassiz therefore insists that these four plana 
 of structure correspond to four ideas in the Creator's 
 mind, which are independent of the animal forms in 
 which they are carried out. It is impossible for us 
 to condense the facts and arguments by which, in 
 thirty-one weighty chapters, he proceeds to show that, 
 from whatever point we survey animal life, we are 
 inevitably led to a Supreme Personal Intelligence 
 as its cause and support, — to an intelligence whose 
 working in the animal creation exhibits " thought, 
 considerate thought, combining power, premeditation, 
 prescience, omniscience." Throughout this portion of 
 his essay we continually feel the power and compre- 
 hensiveness of his mind, both in the graceful ease 
 with which an immense weight and affluence ol 
 knowledge is borne, and the vigorous felicity with 
 which it is wielded in the service of ideas. There is 
 no branch of his subject in which he does not show 
 Himself the master of his materials. The moat con
 
 AGASSIZ. 279 
 
 fused facts fall into order and relation, and readily 
 support principles they were at first supposed to 
 deny, when subjected to the scrutiny of his penetrat- 
 ing intelligence. His chapters on the simultaneous 
 existence of the most diversified types under identi- 
 cal circumstances ; on the repetition of identical types 
 under the most diversified circumstances; on the uni- 
 ty of plan in otherwise highly diversified types ; on 
 the correspondence in the details of structure in ani- 
 mals otherwi.se entirely disconnected ; on the various 
 degrees and different kinds of relationship among ani- 
 mals ; on their gradation of structure ; their range of 
 geographical distribution ; on the serial connection in 
 structure of those widely scattered on the globe's sur- 
 face ; on the relation between their size and struct- 
 ure, and between their size and the mediums in 
 which they live ; on the permanency of specific pe- 
 culiarities in all organized beings ; and on their hab- 
 its, metamorphoses, duration of life, succession, stand- 
 ing, rank, and development: — these are all fertile in 
 original thought and exact observation, and all swell 
 the grand cumulative argument with which he rigor- 
 ously connects organized beings with their Divine 
 Source. It seems to us that he does not leave a 
 loose or broken link in the whole chain of his rear 
 toning.
 
 280 AGASSIZ. 
 
 The second portion of his essay is devoted to s 
 systematic description of the leading groups of ex- 
 isting animals, as a foundation for a natural system 
 of classification, and the third portion to an elaborate 
 exposition and examination of the principal systems 
 of zoology from Aristotle to Von Baer. His defini- 
 tions of the divisions of what he calls the natural 
 system of classification are clear and exact Branches 
 or types are characterized by the plan of their struct- 
 ure ; classes, by the manner in which that plan is 
 executed, as far as ways and means are concerned ; 
 orders, by the degrees of complication of that struct- 
 ure ; families, by their form, as far as determined by 
 structure ; genera, by the details of the execution in 
 special parts ; and species, by the relations of indi- 
 viduals to one another, and to the world in which 
 they live, as well as by the proportion of their parts, 
 their ornamentation, etc. All other divisions are but 
 limitations of these. The representatives of these 
 divisions are perishable individuals. If we select a 
 living animal, we find that it has in its structure all 
 the marks by which we assign it, not only to a cer- 
 tain species and genus, but to an order, family, class 
 and type ; and this classification is not arbitrary, a 
 human device for simplifying our knowledge, but the 
 detection in the object itself of peculiarities divinelj
 
 AOASSIZ. 281 
 
 impressed on its structure. Thus in the animal king- 
 dom, God himself has combined unity and simplicity 
 with the vastest diversity ; and the study of Natural 
 History is not merely the contemplation of His works, 
 but of His ideas and method, — a study, therefore, in 
 which the spirit of meekness and awe can be united 
 with a depth, force, daring, and amplitude of thought, 
 compared with which the speculations of the selfish 
 and sceptical school of natural philosophers appear 
 feeble, and petty, and pert. The greatness of a 
 philosopher is to be measured by what he suggests 
 and aims after, as well as by what he discovers, 
 and he never seems so great as when he uses his 
 powers in attempting to follow the indications in na 
 ture of a Creative Intelligence infinitely greater than 
 himself. 
 
 In conclusion, we may say that Mr. Agassiz's 
 processes and results are curiously contradictory of 
 the dictum of that self-chosen legislator of science, 
 Auguste Comte. We have been assured, over and 
 over again, by the champions of the Philosophic Posi- 
 tive, that Comte's law of the evolution of scientific 
 thought is incontrovertible. Every branch of knowl- 
 edge, according to this law, passes through three 
 itages ; first, the theological or supernatural, in which 
 phenomena are referred to supernatural agents m
 
 282 AGASSIZ. 
 
 their causes, the principle being the same whether 
 the divine source of things is sought in fetichism 
 or theism ; second, the metaphysical, or transitional 
 stage, in which a passage is made from divine per- 
 sons to personified abstractions, which are supposed 
 to underlie, animate, and produce phenomena; and aa 
 the highest conception of the supernatural stage is 
 God considered as cause, so the highest conception 
 of the metaphysical stage is Nature, considered as 
 force ; third, the positive stage, in which all inquiry 
 after causes and essences is discarded, God and Na- 
 ture are expelled from phenomena, and things are 
 classified according to their invariable relations of 
 succession and similitude. The hope of the positivist 
 U. that the various laws with which he now contents 
 his understanding will, in the progress and perfection 
 of science, be found to be the expression of one 
 general and all-inclusive Law. There are, therefore, 
 three modes of viewing facts and relations : the first, 
 which represents the infancy of a science, regards 
 God as the Creator, the second regards Nature as 
 the soul, and the third regards Law as the regulator, 
 of phenomena. The highest conception of the posi- 
 tivist, if individualized, would represent the universe 
 onder the care of a colossal, yet impersonal police- 
 man, whose business was to preserve order. A
 
 AGASSIZ. 283 
 
 present, the positivist admits that he has only seen 
 tome of the inferior police, but he think9 the glori- 
 ous hope may be not unreasonably indulged that, 
 ages after he is rotten, humanity will catch a glimpse 
 of the master constable himself. By the limitation 
 of the human faculties it is impossible for him to 
 pass to any other orders of government. If he keep9 
 within the circle of the knowable, he stops at the 
 constable ; to superstition and metaphysics belong the 
 absurdity of asserting that the constable is not ulti- 
 mate, but implies a governor and a sovereign ! 
 
 Now, in the " Essay on Classification," Mr. Agassiz 
 has certainly indicated his right to be ranked with 
 positive philosophers as far as the observation, dis- 
 covery, and verification of laws is concerned. He is 
 true throughout to facts and the relations of facts, V> 
 those " invariable relations of succession and simih 
 tude " which the objects of his science bear to each 
 other. He reaches positive conclusions, which there 
 is every probability that future additions to natural 
 history will confirm. He knows everything which 
 the positivists of zoology — positivists after the idea 
 of Comte — have observed and demonstrated. He La* 
 taken the science a3 left by them, and carried it for- 
 ward ; and both as an anatomist and embryologist, as 
 »n observer of the structure of animals and as an
 
 284 AGASSIZ. 
 
 observer of their development, he has put on immov 
 able foundations the great law that all animals ar« 
 organized upon four different plans of structure, and 
 grow up according to four different modes of devel- 
 opment. He has corrected the errors, in matters of 
 fact, of many naturalists of Comte's method of think- 
 ing, who, while they are never weary of stigmatizing 
 the influence of theological and metaphysical theories 
 in corrupting science, have themselves unconsciously 
 misread facts by viewing them in the light of mislead- 
 ing theories. And after showing, as Mr. Agassiz has 
 done, that the various divisions of the system of classi- 
 fication he espouses exist in nature, are independent ol 
 the human mind, and are confirmed by observation 
 and experiment, it will not do to say that the science 
 of zoology itself is not yet in the positive stage. 
 How, then, are we to account for the fact that Mr. 
 Agassiz reverses the " inevitable " evolution of scien- 
 tific thought ? How shall we explain the problen 
 that he passes from the positive stage to the super- 
 natural, instead of to the positive from the supernat- 
 ural? It may be hinted — and tolerance and charity 
 are not always accompaniments of scientific infidelity 
 — that he does it in deference to popular prejudice. 
 and not in obedience to the evidence of objective 
 truth. This insinuation deserves to he considered 
 •omewhat at length.
 
 AGASSIZ. 285 
 
 And first, we admit the paramount importance, in 
 he investigation of the facts of creation, of that In- 
 dependence of thought which is based on courageous 
 character. Cowardice paralyzes the noblest powers ; 
 and we own to an instinctive sympathy with every 
 man who, in stating the conscientious results of 
 thought and research, is honored with a howl of 
 execration from that large body of persons who sup- 
 pose that religion is only safe when it is under the 
 guardianship of ignorance and unreason. But we do 
 not think that the fear of rousing theological preju- 
 dice is the kind of fear that a man of science is 
 now in most danger of regarding. He is more 
 tempted to yield to that refined form of cowardice 
 which makes him apprehensive of offending the prej- 
 udices of his order. A theological leaning in his 
 scientific speculations is likely to expose him to the 
 suspicious of his peers in science, and withdraw from 
 him the signs of that subtle freemasonry by which 
 eading minds recognize each other. In France, 
 where eminence in the physical and mathematical 
 sciences is the measure of intellectual ability, there is 
 a strong scientific prejudice against associating nat- 
 ural science with natural theology ; and France ha;i 
 done much to give the tone to the scientific world 
 It would be horrible, if it were not comical, to no«
 
 286 AGASSIZ. 
 
 tice the gravity with which the savans of the great 
 nation have withdrawn their patronage from the 
 Deity. Even Cousin, in his metaphysical opposition 
 to the materialistic tendencies of French thought, 
 excogitates a Deity who is rather a fine effect of 
 philosophic rhetoric than an object of worship ; and 
 he treats Christianity as a man of charming manners 
 would treat a pretty child, making philosophy most 
 condescendingly hold out its hand to her ! In the 
 middle of the last century the very valets of the 
 French men of science considered belief in God the 
 mark of a vulgar mind. Infidelity was prattled by 
 fops just as superstition was prattled by devotees. 
 Free and liberal minds, so called, became members 
 of an intellectual aristocracy, of which atheism, bla- 
 tant or latent, was the condition of admittance. At 
 present God is not so much denied as ignored. 
 French science professes to get along very well 
 without him. Religion, as far as it pretends to 
 intellectual supports, is regarded as a sign of weak- 
 ness, hypocrisy, or fear ; and the fear of being 
 thought a coward operates to scare many natural 
 philosophers into something very like cowardice. To 
 avoid the imputation of superstition, they often hesi- 
 tate to follow the natural action of their understand 
 jigs. We therefore consider that Mr. Agassiz, ai
 
 AGASSIZ. 287 
 
 far as respects the public opinion of the scientific 
 world, — which is the public opinion to which he 
 naturally pays most heed, — will rather lose caste 
 than gain fame among scientific naturalists by insist- 
 ing so strenuously as he does on the theological as- 
 pects of his science. Especially will he be made the 
 object of ridicule for his belief in the interference of 
 God, as Creator, in each geological epoch, — a doc- 
 trine which will be considered by many as equiva. 
 lent to introducing miracles into science, and as 
 carrying it back to the most besotted supernatural 
 stage of knowledge. 
 
 We think, therefore, that Mr. Agassiz overcame a 
 temptation, rather than yielded to one, when he 
 broke through the technical limitations of his science, 
 and passed from laws to ideas, and from ideas to 
 God. But we have stronger proof that no desire 
 to propitiate popular prejudices induced him to run 
 the risk of offending scientific prejudices, in the 
 qualities of character impressed on his work itself. 
 The task of criticism is not merely to apply laws, 
 but discern natures ; and certainly Mr. Agassiz, in 
 the " E<say on Classification," has exhibited himself 
 as clearly as he has exhibited his subject. An hon- 
 est, sturdy, generous, self-renouncing love of tru h, 
 »nd willingness to follow whithersoever it loads, — to
 
 288 AGASSIZ. 
 
 atheism, if the facts force him that way, to theism, 
 if the facts conduct him to God, — this is the char- 
 acteristic which his broad and open nature haa 
 stamped unmistakably on his page. Every sentence 
 speaks scorn of intellectual reserves, and innocence 
 of intellectual guile. And it is this truthful spirit 
 animating his labors which gives to his results no 
 small portion of their value and significance ; for 
 falseness in the character is likely in the end to 
 become falseness in the intellect ; and a thinker on 
 the great themes which interest all mankind is 
 shorn of his influence if his qualities of disposition 
 are such as to cast doubts on his mental honesty, 
 and to put his readers continually on their guard 
 against observations he is supposed capable of mak- 
 ing wilfully inaccurate, and reasonings he is sup- 
 posed capable of making wilfully fallacious. 
 
 In his "Essay on Classification," Mr. Agassiz states 
 his scientific convictions. But he is not merely a 
 scientific thinker : he is a scientific force ; and no 
 small portion of the immense influence he exerts is 
 iue to the energy, intensity, and geniality which 
 distinguish the nature of the man. In personal in- 
 tercourse he inspires as well as informs, communi- 
 cates not only knowledge, but the love of knowl- 
 edge, and makes for the time everything appear o'
 
 AGASSIZ. 289 
 
 small account in comparison with the subject which 
 has possession of his soul. To hear him speak on 
 his favorite themes is to become inflamed with his 
 enthusiasm. He is at once one of the most domi- 
 nating and one of the most sympathetic of men, 
 having the qualities of leader and companion com- 
 bined in singular harmony. People follow him, work 
 for him, contribute money for his objects, not only 
 from the love inspired by his good fellowship, but 
 from the compulsion exercised by his force. Di- 
 vorced from his geniality, his energy would make 
 him disliked as a dictator ; divorced from his energy 
 his geniality would be barren of practical effects. 
 The good-will he inspires in others quickens their 
 active faculties as well as their benevolent feelings. 
 They feel that, magnetized by the man, they must 
 do something for the science impersonated in the 
 man, — that there is no way of enjoying his compan- 
 ionship without catching the contagion of his spirit. 
 lie consequently wields, through his social qualities, 
 a wider personal influence over a wider variety of 
 persons than any other scientific man of his time. 
 At his genial instigation, laborers delve and dive, 
 students toil for specimens, merchants open their 
 purses, legislatures pass appropriation bills. To do 
 something for Agassiz is a pleasing addition to the 
 
 IS 8
 
 290 agassiz. 
 
 Whole Duty of Man in the region whert he lives. 
 Everybody feels that the indefatigable observer anu 
 thinker, who declined a lucrative lecture invitatiou 
 because, he said, he could not waste his time its 
 making money, has no other than public ends in 
 his eager demands for public co-operation in his 
 scientific schemes. A perfect democrat in his man- 
 ners, meeting every man on the level of his posi- 
 tion and character, he is the equal and companion 
 of all, and inundates all with his abounding personal 
 vitality and cheer. At times the intensity of his 
 temperament may rise to something like irascibility 
 in the championship of his settled convictions; but 
 this is felt to be a necessary consequence of that 
 identification of the man with his pursuit which is 
 the spring of his tireless energy and of his all-sacri- 
 ficing devotion to the advancement of his science. 
 Even his vehemence partakes of the largeness, gen- 
 erosity, and geniality of his nature, — is the "noble 
 rage" of a capacious yet ardent intelligence, momen- 
 tarily carried away by that hatred of error which is 
 the negative form of the love of truth. 
 
 This wide geniality is not, in Agassiz, confined to 
 his own race, but extends to the objects of his sci- 
 ence. He considers all organized beings as endowed 
 with minds ; and as a dramatic poet passes, by imagi-
 
 AGASSIZ. 291 
 
 nation and sympathy, into individaal natures differ- 
 ing from his own, thinking from the point of view 
 of Bottom as easily as from the point of view of 
 Hamlet, so Agassiz, passing tt o bounds even of his 
 own kind, has a sort of interpretative glance into 
 the mental and moral constitution of animals, as well 
 as a scientific perception of their structure. He 
 seems at times to have established spiritual commu- 
 nication with them, so deeply and sympathetically he 
 comprehends their natures and needs ; and it might 
 be said that they appear to have a dim perception 
 of his good intentions towards their order, even when 
 he is compelled to sacrifice individuals among them 
 for the good of the science by which they are enno- 
 bled. We never hear of his being injured by any 
 of the creatures he captures and dissects. By a fan- 
 ciful exaggeration, we might even suppose that the 
 martyrs of his zoological researches, the patriots of 
 the Animal Kingdom, the Leonidases and Ilofers 
 of natural history, had a consciousness that they 
 were immolated for the benefit of their species ; that 
 their death was the price hy which the welfare of 
 their race was to be assured; that Agassiz, their in- 
 terpreter, who introduced them to the higher human 
 order of beings, had the dignity and permanent inter- 
 est* of their k>nd at heart even when he killed; ana
 
 292 AGASSIZ. 
 
 that in his hands they became illustrations and proofs 
 of a vast scheme of creation, visible links in a chain 
 of reasoning which, beginning with the structure of 
 the lowest form of animal life, has no other intelli- 
 gent end than in the ideas of God.
 
 XII. 
 
 WASlliauTON AND THE PRINCIPLES OP 
 THE REVOLUTION.* 
 
 THE day, gentlemen, we have here met to com- 
 memorate, in the spirit of a somewhat soberei 
 joy than rings in the noisy jubilee of the streets, is 
 not so much a day dedicated to liberty in the ab- 
 stract, as a day especially consecrated to American 
 liberty and American independence. The true char- 
 acter of that liberty is to be sought in the events of 
 our Colonial history, in the manners and laws of our 
 Colonial forefathers, and, above all, in the stern, brief 
 epitome of our whole Colonial life contained in that 
 memorable Declaration, the maxims of whose sturdy 
 wisdom still sound in our ears and linger in our 
 hearts, as we have heard them read in this hall to- 
 day ; a Declaration peculiar among all others of its 
 kind, not merely for the fearless free spirit which 
 beats and burns beneath every decisive sentence, but 
 or its combination of clearness in the statement of 
 
 • An Oration delivered before tie municipal authorities of Bo* 
 too, July 4, 1850.
 
 294 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 particular grievances with audacity in the announce* 
 tfient of general principles ; a Declaration, indeed, 
 abounding in sentiments of liberty so sinewy and 
 bold, and ideas of liberty uo exact and practical, that 
 it bears on every immortal feature the signs of rep- 
 resenting a people, to whom liberty had been long 
 familiar as a living law, as an organized institution, 
 as a homely, household fact. The peculiarities which 
 distinguish the whole substance and tone of this sol- 
 emn instrument are peculiarities of the American 
 Revolution itself, giving dignity to its events and 
 import to its principles, as they gave success to its 
 arms. 
 
 Liberty, considered as an element of human na- 
 ture, would naturally, if unchecked, follow an ideal 
 law of development, appearing first as a dim but 
 potent sentiment; then as an intelligent sentiment, or 
 idea ; then as an organized idea, or body of institu- 
 tions, recognizing mutual rights and enforcing mutual 
 duties. But, in its historical development, we find 
 that the unselfish nature of liberty is strangely inter- 
 mixed with its selfish perversion ; that, in struggling 
 tvith outward oppression, it develops inward hatreds; 
 that the sentiment is apt tc fester into a malignant 
 passion, the idea to dwindle into a barren opinion, 
 %nd this passionate opinion to issue in anarchy, which
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 295 
 
 ie despotism disorganized, but as tyrannical under its 
 thousand wills as under its one. These hostile ele- 
 ments, which make up the complex historical fact of 
 liberty, — one positive, the other negative, — one or- 
 ganizing, the other destructive, — are always at work 
 in human affairs with beneficent or baleful energy ; 
 but, as society advances, the baser elements give 
 way by degrees to the nobler, and liberty ever tenda 
 to realize itself in law. The most genial operation 
 of its creative spirit is when it appears as a still, 
 mysterious, plastic influence, silently and surely mod- 
 ifying the whole constitution of a despotic society, 
 Btealing noiselessly into manners, insinuating itself 
 : nto the administration of laws, grafting new shoots 
 upon the decaying trunks of old institutions, and in- 
 sensibly building up in a people's mind a character 
 strong enough to maintain rights which are also cus- 
 toms. If its most beneficent influence be seen in its 
 gradual organization of liberties, of sentiments rooted 
 in facts, its most barren effect for good is when it 
 scatters abstract opinions of freedom, true to nothing 
 existing in a people's practical life, and scorning all 
 illiance with manners or compromise with fact. This 
 is a fertile source of disorder, of revolts which end 
 in massacres, of Ages of Reason which end in 
 Reigns of Terro" ; and perhaps the failure of mosl
 
 296 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 of the European movements comes from their being 
 either mad uprisings against the pressure of intolera« 
 ble miseries, or fruitless strivings to establish abstract 
 principles. Such principles, however excellent as 
 propositions, can influence only a small minority of 
 a nation, for a nation rises only in defence of rights 
 which have been violated, not for rights which it 
 has never exercised ; and abstract " liberty, equality, 
 and fraternity," pushed by amiable sentimentalists 
 like Lamartine, and Satanic sentimentalists like Le- 
 dru Rollin, have found their fit result in the armed 
 bureaucracy, now encamped in Paris, under the 
 ironical nickname of " French Republic." 
 
 Now, it was the peculiar felicity of our position, 
 that free institutions were planted here at the origi- 
 nal settlement of the country, — institutions which 
 De Tocqueville considers founded on principles far 
 in advance of the wisest political science of Europe 
 at that day; and accordingly our Revolution began in 
 the defence of rights which were customs, of ideas 
 which were facts, of liberties which were laws ; and 
 these rights, ideas, and liberties, embodying as they 
 llid the common life and experience of the people, 
 were truly considered a palpable property, an inal« 
 tenable inheritance of freedom, which the Stamp Act^ 
 •nd the other measures of Colonial taxation, tlneai
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 297 
 
 ened with confiscation. Parliament, therefore, ap- 
 peared in America as a spoiler, making war upon 
 the people it assumed to govern, and it thus stimu- 
 lated and combined the opposition of all classes ; for 
 a wrong cannot but be universally perceived when it 
 is universally felt. By thus starting up in defence 
 of the freedom they really possessed, the Colonies 
 vastly increased it. In struggling against innovation, 
 they " innovated " themselves into independence ; in 
 battling against novelties, they wrought out into act- 
 ual form the startling novelty of constitutional Amer- 
 ican liberty. It was because they had exercised 
 rights that they were such proficients in principles ; 
 it was because they had known liberty as an institu- 
 tion that they understood it as a science. 
 
 Thus it was not so much the perception of ab- 
 stract opinions, as the inspiration of positive institu- 
 tions, which gave our forefathers the heart to brave, 
 and the ability successfully to defy, the colossal 
 power of England ; but it must be admitted that in 
 its obnoxious colonial policy England had parted 
 with her wisdom, and ; n parting with her wisdom 
 had weakened her power ; falling, as Burke says, 
 under the opera/ion of that immutable law " which 
 decrees vexation *.o violence, and poverty to rapine.' 
 The England arrayed again** us was not the Eng 
 
 13»
 
 298 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 land w'iich, a few years before, its energies wielded 
 by tbe lofty and impassioned genius of the elder 
 Pitt, had smitten the power and humbled the pride 
 of two great European monarchies, and spread its 
 fleets and armies, animated by one vehement soul, 
 over three quarters of the globe. The administra- 
 tions of the English government, from 1760 to the 
 close of our Revolutionary war, were more or less 
 directed by the intriguing incapacity of the king. 
 George the Third is said to have possessed many 
 private virtues, — and very private for a long time 
 he kept them from his subjects, — but, as a monarch, 
 he was without magnanimity in his sentiments or 
 enlargement in his ideas ; prejudiced, uncultivated, 
 bigoted, and perverse ; and his boasted morality and 
 piety, when exercised in the sphere of government, 
 partook of the narrowness of his mind and the ob- 
 stinacy of his will ; his conscience being used to 
 transmute his hatreds into duties, and his religious 
 sentiment to sanctify his vindictive passions ; and as 
 it was his ambition to rule an empire by the potty 
 politics of a court, he preferred rather to have his 
 folly flattered by parasites than his ignorance en- 
 lightened by statesmen. Such a disposition in the 
 king of a free country was incompatible with eflfi 
 riency in the conduct of affairs, as it split partiei
 
 OF THE REVOLUTION. 299 
 
 into factions, and made established principles yield to 
 personal expedients. Bute, the king's first minister, 
 after a short administration unexampled for corrup- 
 tion and feebleness, gave way before a storm of pop- 
 ular contempt and hatred. To him succeeded George 
 Grenville, the originator of the Stamp Act, and the 
 blundering promoter of American Independence. Gren- 
 ville was a hard, sullen, dogmatic, penurious man of 
 affairs, with a complete mastery of the details of 
 parl : amen'^ary business, and threading with ease all 
 the labyrinths of English law, but limited in his con- 
 ceptions, fixed in his opinions, without any of that 
 sagacity which reads results in their principles, and 
 chiefly distinguished for a kind of sour honesty, not 
 infrequently found in men of harsh tempers and 
 technical intellects. It was soon discovered, that, 
 though imperious enough to be a tyrant, he was not 
 servile enough to be a tool ; that the same domineer- 
 ing temper which enabled him to push arbitrary 
 measures in Parliament, made him put insolent ques- 
 tions in the closet; and the king, in despair of a 
 servant who could not tax America and* persecute 
 Wilkes, without at the same time insulting his inna- 
 te. ~, dismissed him for the Marquis of Rockingham, 
 the 'eader of the great "Whig connection, and a sturdy 
 Wend of the Colonists both before the Revolution and
 
 SCO WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 during its progress. Under him the Stamp Act waa 
 repealed ; but his administration soon proved too lib- 
 eral to satisfy the politicians who governed the un- 
 derstanding of the king ; and the experiment was 
 tried of a composite ministry, put together by Chat- 
 ham, consisting of members selected from different 
 factions, but without any principle of cohesion to 
 unite them ; and the anarchy inherent in the arrange- 
 ment became portentously apparent, when Chatham, 
 driven by the gout into a state of nervous imbecility, 
 left it to work out its mission of misrule, and its 
 eccentric control was seized by the Chancellor of the 
 Exchequer, the gay, false, dissipated, veering, presump- 
 tuous, and unscrupulous Charles Townshend. This man 
 was so brilliant and fascinating as an orator, that Wal- 
 pole said of one of his speeches, that it was like hear- 
 ing Garrick act extempore scenes from Congreve ; 
 but he was without any guiding moral or political 
 principles; and, boundlessly admired by the House 
 of Commons and boundlessly craving its admiration, 
 he seemed to act ever from the impulses of vanity, 
 and speak* ever from the inspiration of champagne. 
 Grenville, smarting under his recent defeat, but still 
 doggedly bent on having a revenue raised in Amer 
 ica, missed no opportunity of goading this versatile 
 political roue with his exasperating sarcasms. ^Yow
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 301 
 
 »re cowards," said he on one occasion, turning to the 
 Treasury bench; "you are afraid of the Americans; 
 you dare not tax America." Townshend, stung by 
 this taunt, started passionately up from his seat, ex- 
 claiming, " Fear ! cowards ! dare not tax America ! T 
 do dare tax America!" and this boyish bravado ush- 
 ered in the celebrated bill, which was to cost Eng- 
 land thirteen colonies, add a hundred millions of 
 pounds to her debt, and affix a stain on her public 
 character. Townshend, by the grace of a putrid fever, 
 was saved from witnessing the consequences of his 
 vainglorious presumption ; and the direction of his 
 policy eventually fell into the hands of Lord North, 
 a good-natured, second-rate, jobbing statesman, equally 
 destitute of lofty virtues and splendid vices, under 
 whose administration the American war was com- 
 menced and prosecuted. Of all the ministers of 
 George the Third, North was the most esteemed by 
 his sovereign ; for he had the tact to follow plans 
 which originated in the king's unreasoning brain and 
 wilful disposition, and yet to veil their weak injus- 
 tice in a drapery of arguments furnished from his 
 own more enlarged mind and easier temper. Chat- 
 ham and Camden thundered against him in the 
 Lords ; Burke and Fox raved and shouted states 
 oianship to him in the Commons, and screamed out
 
 802 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 the maxims of wisdom in ecstasies of invective ; but 
 he, good-naturedly tolerant to political adversaries, 
 blandly indhTerent to popular execration, and sleeping 
 quietly through whole hours of philippics hot with 
 threats of impeachment, pursued his course of court- 
 ordained folly with the serene composure of a Ulys- 
 Bes or a Somers. The war, as conducted by his 
 ministry, was badly managed ; but he had one wise 
 thought which happily failed to become a fact. The 
 command in America, on the breaking out of serious 
 disturbances, was offered to Lord Clive ; but, fortu- 
 nately for us, Clive, at about that time, concluded to 
 commit suicide, and our rustic soldiery were thus 
 saved from meeting in the field a general, who, in 
 vigor of will and fertility of resource, was unequalled 
 by any European commander who had appeared since 
 the death of Marlborough. It may here be added, 
 that Lord North's plans of conciliation were the 
 amiabilities of tyranny and benignities of extortion. 
 They bring to mind the little French fable, wherein 
 a farmer convokes the tenants of his barn-yard, and 
 with sweet solemnity says, " Dear animals, I have 
 assembled you here to advise me what sauce I shall 
 rook you with." " But," exclaims au insurrectionary 
 chicken, "we don't want to be eaten at all!" — 1« 
 which the urbane chairman replies, " My child, yoo 
 wander from the point ! "
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 303 
 
 Such was the government whose policy and whose 
 »rms were directed against our rights and liberties 
 during the Revolutionary war. As soon as the 
 struggle began, it was obvious t lat England could 
 hold dominion over no portion of the country, except 
 what her armies occupied or wasted for the time ; 
 and that the issue of the contest turned on the ques- 
 tion as to which would first yield, — the obstinacy of 
 the king or the fortitude of the Americans. It was 
 plain that George the Third would never yield 
 except under compulsion from the other forces of 
 the English constitution ; that, as long as a corrupt 
 House of Commons would vote supplies, he would 
 prosecute the war, no matter what might be the ex- 
 pense of blood and treasure to England, no matter 
 what might be the infliction of misery upon America. 
 Conquest was hopeless ; and Lord North, before the 
 war was half concluded, was in favor of abandoning 
 it; but all considerations of policy and humanity 
 were lost upon the small mind and conscientiously 
 malignant temper of the king. Indeed, the peculiar- 
 ity of our struggle consisted in its being with an 
 unwise ruler, who could not understand that war, 
 waged after the objects for which it was declared 
 have utterly failed becomes mere rapine and mur- 
 der ; and our energy and endurance were put to tin
 
 304 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 terrible test, of bearing up against the king's armies, 
 until the English nation, humbling its irritated pride, 
 should be roused in our behalf, and break down the 
 king's stubborn purpose. We all know, and may we 
 never forget, that this resistance to tyrannical inno- 
 vation was no fiery outbreak of popular passion, 
 spending itself in two or three battles, and then sub- 
 siding into gloomy apathy ; but a fixed and reason- 
 able resolve, proof against corrupt and sophistical 
 plans of conciliation, against defeats and massacres, 
 against universal bankruptcy and commercial ruin, — 
 a resolve, which the sight of burning villages, and 
 cities turned into British camps, only maddened intc 
 fiercer persistence, and which the slow consuming 
 fever of an eight years' war, with its soul-sickening 
 calamities and vicissitudes, could not weaken into 
 submission. The history, so sad and so glorious, 
 which chronicles the stern struggle in which our 
 rights and liberties passed through the awful baptism 
 of fire and blood, is eloquent with the deeds of many 
 patriots, warriors, and statesmen ; but these all fa 
 into relations t\ one prominent and commanding fig- 
 ure, towering up above the whole group in unap 
 proachable majesty, whose exalted character, warm 
 and bright with every public and private virtue, and 
 rital with the essential spirit of wisdom, has bursl
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 305 
 
 ill sectional and national bounds, and made the 
 Dame of Washington the property of all mankind. 
 
 This illustrious man, at once the world's admira- 
 tion and enigma, we are taught by a fine instinct to 
 venerate, and by a wrong opinion to misjudge. The 
 might of his character has taken strong hold upon 
 the feelings of great masses of men ; but, in trans 
 la ting this universal sentiment into an intelligent 
 form, the intellectual element of his wonderful nature 
 is as much depressed as the moral element is ex- 
 alted, and consequently we are apt to misundor&tand 
 both. Mediocrity has a bad trick of idealizing itself 
 in eulogizing him, and drags him down to its own 
 level while assuming to lift him to the skks. How 
 many times have we been told that he was not a 
 man of genius, but a person of " excellent common 
 Bense," of "admirable judgment," of "rare virtues"! 
 and, by a constant repetition of this odious cant, we 
 have nearly succeeded in divorcing comprehension 
 from his sense, insight from his judgment, force from 
 his virtues, and life from the man. Accordingly, in 
 the panegyric of cold spirits, Washington disappears 
 in a cloud of commonplaces ; in the rodomontade of 
 boiling patriots, he expires in the agonies of rant. 
 Now, the sooner this bundle of mediocre talents and 
 moral qualities, which its contrivers have the an
 
 30G WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 dacity to call George "Washington, is hissed out of 
 existence, the better it will be for the cause of talent 
 and the cause of morals : contempt of that is the con- 
 dition of insight. He had no genius, it seems. 
 no ! genius, we must suppose, is the peculiar and 
 Bhining attribute of some orator, whose tongue can 
 Bpout patriotic speeches, or some versifier, whose muse 
 can " Hail Columbia," but not of the man who sup- 
 ported states on his arm, and carried America in his 
 brain. The madcap Charles Townshend, the motion 
 of whose pyrotechnic mind was like the whiz of a 
 hundred rockets, is a man of genius ; but George 
 Washington, raised up above the level of even emi- 
 nent statesmen, and with a nature moving with the 
 still and orderly celerity of a planet round the sun, 
 — he dwindles, in comparison, into a kind of angelic 
 dunce! What is genius? Is it worth anything? Is 
 splendid folly the measure of its inspiration ? Is wis- 
 dom that which it recedes from, or tends towards? 
 And by what definition do you award the name to 
 the creator of an epic, and deny it to the creator of 
 a country? On what principle is it to be lavished 
 on him who sculptures in perishing marble the im- 
 age of possible excellence, and withheld from liiir 
 who built up in himself a transcendent character 
 indestructible as the obligations of Duty, and beauti 
 ful as ber rewards?
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 307 
 
 Indeed, if by the genius of action you mean will 
 fcnlightened by intelligence, and intelligence energized 
 by will, — if force and insight be its characteristics, 
 and influence its test, — and, especially, if great ef- 
 fects suppose a cause proportionably great, that is, a 
 vital causative mind, — then is Washington most as- 
 suredly a man of genius, and one whom no other 
 American has equalled in the power of working 
 morally and mentally on other minds. His genius, 
 It is true, was of a peculiar kind, the genius of char- 
 acter, of thought and the objects of thought solidified 
 and concentrated into active faculty. He belongs 
 to that rare class of men, — rare as Homers and 
 Miltons, rare as Platos and Newtons, — who have 
 impressed their characters upon nations without pam- 
 pering national vices. Such men have natures broad 
 enough to include all the facts of a people's practical 
 life, and deep enough to discern the spiritual laws 
 which underlie, animate, and govern those facts. 
 Washington, in short, had that greatness of charac- 
 ter which is the highest expression and last result 
 of greatness of mind ; for there is no method of 
 building up character except through mind. Indeed, 
 character ike his is not built up, stone upon stone, 
 precept upon precept, but grows up, through an act- 
 ual contact of thought witn things, — the assimilative
 
 308 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 mind transmuting the impalpable but potent spirit of 
 public sentiment, and the life of visible facts, and the 
 power of spiritual laws, into individual life and pow 
 er, so that their mighty energies put on personality, 
 as it were, and act through one centralizing human 
 will. This process may not, if you please, make the 
 great philosopher or the great poet; but it does make 
 the great man, — the man in whom thought and judg- 
 ment seem identical with volition, — the man whose 
 vital expression is not in words, but deeds, — the 
 man whose sublime ideas issue necessarily in sublime 
 acts, not in sublime art. It was because Washing- 
 ton's character was thus composed of the inmost sub- 
 stance and power of facts and principles, that men 
 instinctively felt the perfect reality of his comprehen- 
 sive manhood. This reality enforced universal re- 
 spect, married strength to repose, and threw into his 
 face that commanding majesty, which made men ot 
 the speculative audacity of Jefferson, and the lucid 
 genius of Hamilton, recognize, with unwonted meek- 
 ness, his awful superiority. 
 
 But, you may say, how does this account for Wash- 
 .ngton's v'rtues ? Was his disinterestedness will ? Was 
 his patriotism intelligence? Was his morality genius ? 
 These questions I should answer with an emphatic 
 res ; foi there are few falser fallacies than that which
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 309 
 
 "^presents moral conduct as flowing from moral opin- 
 ions detached from moral character. Why, there is 
 hardly a tyrant, sycophant, demagogue, or liberticide 
 mentioned in history, who had not enough moral 
 opinions to suffice for a new Eden ; and Shakespeare, 
 the sure-seeing poet of human nature, delights to put 
 the most edifying maxims of ethics into the mouths 
 ot his greatest villains, of Angelo, of Richard the 
 Third, of the uncle-father of Hamlet. Without doubt 
 Ca?sar and Napoleon could have discoursed more flu- 
 ently than Washington on patriotism, as there are a 
 thousand French republicans, of the last hour's coin- 
 age, who could prattle more eloquently than he on 
 freedom. "But Washington's morality was built up in 
 warring with outward temptations and inward pas- 
 Bions, and every grace of his conscience was a trophy 
 of toil and struggle. He had no moral opinions 
 which hard experience and sturdy discipline had not 
 vitalized into moral sentiments, and organized into 
 moral powers ; and these powers, fixed and seated in 
 the inmost heart of his character, were mighty and 
 far-sighted forces, which made his intelligence moral 
 and his morality intelligent, and which no sorcery of 
 the selfish passions ;ould overcome or deceive. In 
 the sublime metaphysics of the New Testament, his 
 eye was single, and this made his whole body full o/
 
 310 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 light. It is just here that so many other eminent 
 men of action, who have heen tried by strong temp 
 tations, have miserably failed. Blinded by pride, or 
 whirled on by wrath, they have ceased to discern 
 and regard the inexorable moral laws, obedience to 
 which is the condition of all permanent success ; and, 
 in the labyrinths of fraud and unrealities in which 
 crime entangles ambition, the thousand-eyed genius 
 of wilful error is smitten with folly and madness. 
 No human intellect, however vast its compass and 
 delicate its tact, can safely thread those terrible 
 mazes. "Every heaven-stormer," says a quaint Ger- 
 man, "finds his hell, as sure as every mountain its 
 valley." Let us not doubt the genius of Washington 
 because it was identical with wisdom, and because 
 its energies worked with, and not against, the spirit- 
 ual order its " single eye " was gifted to divine. We 
 commonly say that he acted in accordance with moral 
 laws ; but we must recollect that moral laws are in- 
 tellectual facts, and are known through intellectual 
 processes. We commonly say that he was so consci- 
 entious as ever to follow the path of right, and obey 
 the voice of duty. But what is right but an abstract 
 term for rights ? What is duty but an abstract term 
 *br duties ? Rights and duties move not in parallel 
 but converging lines; and how, in the terror, discord,
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 311 
 
 and madness of a civil war, with rights and duties 
 in confused conflict, can a man seize on the exact 
 point where clashing rights harmonize, and where 
 opposing duties are reconciled, and act vigorously on 
 the conception, without having a conscience so in- 
 formed with intelligence that his nature gravitates to 
 the truth as by the very instinct and essence of 
 reason? 
 
 The virtues of Washington, therefore, appear moral 
 or mental according as we view them with the eye 
 of conscience or reason. In him, loftiness did not 
 exclude breadth, but resulted from it ; justice did not 
 exclude wisdom, but grew out of it ; and, as the wis- 
 est as well as justest man in America, he was pre- 
 eminently distinguished among his contemporaries for 
 moderation, — a word under which weak politicians 
 conceal their want of courage, and knavish politicians 
 their want of principle, but which in him was vital 
 and comprehensive energy, tempering audacity with 
 prudence, self-reliance with modesty, austere princi- 
 ples with merciful charities, inflexible purpose with 
 6erene courtesy, and issuing in that persistent and 
 unconquerable fortitude, in which lie excelled all 
 mankind. In scrutinizing the events of his life to 
 discover the processes by which his character grew 
 giadually up to its amazing height, we are arrested
 
 812 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 at the beginning by tbe character of his mother, a 
 woman temperate like him in the use of words, from 
 her clear perception and vigorous grasp of things. 
 There is a familiar anecdote recorded of her, which 
 enables us to understand the simple sincerity and 
 genuine heroism she early instilled into his strong 
 and aspiring mind. At a time when his glory rang 
 through Europe ; when excitable enthusiasts were 
 crossing the Atlantic for the single purpose of seeing 
 him ; when bad poets all over the world were sack- 
 ing the dictionaries for hyperboles of panegyric ; 
 when the pedants of republicanism were calling him 
 the American Cincinnatus and the American Fabius 
 — as if our Washington were honored in playing the 
 adjective to any Roman, however illustrious ! — she, 
 in her quiet dignity, simply said to the voluble 
 friends who were striving to flatter her mother's 
 pride into an expression of exulting praise, " that he 
 had been a good son, and she believed he had done 
 his duty as a man." Under the care of a mother, 
 who flooded common words with such a wealth of 
 meaning, the boy was not likely to mistake medioc- 
 rity for excellence, but would naturally domesticate 
 in his heart lofty principles of conduct, and act from 
 them as a matter of course, without expecting or ob- 
 taining praise. The consequence was, that in earlv
 
 OF THE REVOLUTION. 313 
 
 ife, and in his first occupation as surveyor, and 
 trough the stirring events of the French war, he 
 built up character day by day in a systematic en 
 durance of hardship; in a constant sacrifice of incli- 
 nations to duty ; in taming hot passions into the 
 service of reason ; in assiduously learning from other 
 minds ; in wringing knowledge, which could not be 
 taught him, from the reluctant grasp of a flinty ex- 
 perience ; in completely mastering every subject on 
 which he fastened his intellect, so that whatever he 
 knew he knew perfectly and forever, transmuting it 
 into mind, and sending it forth in acts. Intellectual 
 and moral principles, which other men lazily contem- 
 plate and talk about, he had learned through a pro- 
 cess which gave them the toughness of muscle and 
 V)ne. A man thus sound at the core and on the 
 surface of his nature ; so full at once of integrity and 
 Bagacity ; speaking ever from the level of his charac- 
 ter, and always ready to substantiate opinions with 
 deeds; — a man without any morbid egotism, or pre- 
 tension, or extravagance ; simple, modest, dignified, 
 incorruptible ; never giving advice wluV>h events did 
 not indorse as wise, never lacking fortitude to bear 
 calamities which resulted from his Mr>ce being over- 
 ruled ; — such a man could not but exact that re ig- 
 nition of commanding genius which inspires 'in'^eraal 
 14
 
 314 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 confidence. Accordingly, when the contest between 
 the colonies and the mother country was assuming 
 its inevitable form of civil war, he was found to be 
 our natural leader in virtue of being the ablest man 
 among a crowd of able men. When he appeared 
 among the eloquent orators, the ingenious thinkers, 
 the vehement patriots, of the Revolution, his modesty 
 and temperate professions could not conceal his su- 
 periority : he at once, by the very nature of great 
 character, was felt to be their leader ; towered up, 
 indeed, over all their heads as naturally as the foun- 
 tain, sparkling yonder in this July sun, which, in its 
 long, dark, downward journey, forgets not the altitude 
 of its parent lake, and no sooner finds an outlet in 
 our lower lands than it mounts, by an impatient in- 
 stinct, surely up to the level of its far-off inland 
 source. 
 
 After the first flush and fevei of the Revolution- 
 ary excitement were over, and the haggard fact of 
 civil war was visible in all its horrors, it soon ap- 
 peared how vitally important was such a character 
 to the success of such a cause. We have already 
 seen that the issue of the contest depended, not on 
 the decision of this or that battle, not on the occu- 
 pation of this or that city, but on the power of the 
 colonists to wear ot\ the patience exhaust the re»
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 315 
 
 sources, and tame the pride of Great Britain The 
 king, when Lord North threatened, in 1778, to resign 
 unless the war were discontinued, expressed his de- 
 termination to lose his crown rather than acknowl- 
 edge the independence of the rebels ; he was as much 
 f pposed to that acknowledgment in 1783 as 1778; 
 .md it was only by a pressure from without, and 
 when the expenditures for the war had reached more 
 ^han a. hundred millions of pounds, that a reluctant 
 consent wab forced from that small, spiteful mind. 
 Now, undoubttdly a vast majority of the American 
 people were unalterably resolved on independence ; 
 but they were spread through thirteen colonies, were 
 not without mutual jfcakuaies, and were represented 
 in a Congress whose delegated powers were insuf- 
 ficient to prosecute war with vigor. The problem 
 was, how to combine the strength, allay the suspi- 
 cions, and sustain the patriotism of the people, dur- 
 ing a contest peculiarly calculated to distract and 
 weaken their energies. Washington "olved this prob 
 lem by the true geometry of indomitable personal 
 character. He was the soul of the RevoL>tion, felt 
 at its centre, and felt through all its parts, as a 
 uniting, organizing, animating power. Comprehensive 
 as America itself, through him, and through hi.* 
 %lone, could the strength of America aft. Hj wu
 
 316 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 Becurity in defeat, cheer in despondency, light in 
 darkness, hope in despair, — the one man in whom 
 all could have confidence, — the one man whose sun- 
 like integrity and capacity shot rays of light and 
 heat through everything they shone upon. He would 
 not stoop to thwart the machinations of envy ; he 
 would not stoop to contradict the fictions and for- 
 geries of calumny ; and he did not need to do it. 
 Before the effortless might of his character, they 
 stole away, and withered, and died ; and through no 
 instrumentality of his did their abject authors become 
 immorta as the mali<*ners of Washington. 
 
 To do justice to Washington's military career, we 
 must consider that he had to fuse the hardest indi- 
 vidual materials into a mass of national force, which 
 was to do battle, not only with disciplined armies, 
 but with frost, famine, and disease. Missing the 
 rapid succession of brilliant engagements between 
 forces almost equal, and the dramatic storm and 
 gwift consummation of events, which European cam- 
 paigns have made familiar, there are those who see 
 l 1 him only a slow, sure, and patient commander, 
 without readiness of combination or energy of move- 
 ment. But the truth is, the quick eye of his pru 
 ilent audacity seized occasions to deliver blows with 
 the prompt felicity of Marlborough or Wellington
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. &1 S 
 
 He evinced no lack of the highest energy a.id sk/U 
 when he turned back the tide of defeat at Monmouth, 
 3r in the combinations which preceded the siege of 
 Yorktown, or in the rapid and masterly movements 
 by which, at a period when he was considered ut- 
 terly ruined, he stooped suddenly down upon Tren- 
 ton, broke up all the enemy's posts on the Delaware, 
 and snatched Philadelphia from a superior and victo- 
 rious foe. Again, some eulogists have caricatured 
 him as a passionless, imperturbable, " proper " man ; 
 but, at the battle of Monmouth, General Lee was 
 privileged to discover, that from those firm, calm 
 lips could leap words hotter and more smiting than 
 the hot June sun that smote down upon their heads. 
 Indeed, "Washington's incessant and various activity 
 answered to the strange complexity of his position, 
 as the heart and brain of a Revolution, which 
 demanded not merely generalship, but the highest 
 qualities of the statesman, the diplomatist, and the 
 patriot. As we view him in his long seven years' 
 struggle with the perilous difficulties r i his situation, 
 his activity constantly entangled in a mesh of con- 
 6icting considerations, — with his eye fixed on Con- 
 gress, on the States, and on the people, as will 
 as on the enemy, — compelled to compose sectional 
 quarrels, to inspire faltering patriotism, and to tri-
 
 ,418 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 amph over all the forces of stupidity and selfishness, 
 — compelled to watch, and wait, and warn, and for- 
 bear, and endure, as well as to act, — compelled, 
 amid vexations and calamities which might have 
 stung the dullest sensibilities into madness, to trans- 
 mute the fire of the fiercest passion into an element 
 of fortitude ; — and, especially, as we view him com- 
 ing out of that terrible and obscure scene of trial 
 and temptation, without any bitterness in his virtue, 
 or hatred in his patriotism, but full of the loftiest 
 wisdom and serenest power; — as we view all this in 
 the order of its history, that placid face grows grad- 
 ually sublime, and in its immortal repose looks rebuke 
 to our presumptuous eulogium of the genius whicl 
 breathes through it! 
 
 We all know that towards the end of the weary- 
 ing struggle, and when his matchless moderation and 
 invincible fortitude were about to be crowned witb 
 the hallowing glory which Liberty piously reserver 
 for her triumphant saints and martyrs, a committee 
 of his officers proposed to make him king ; and we 
 sometimes do him the cruel injustice to say that his 
 virtue overcame the temptation. lie was not knave 
 enough, or fool enough, to be tempted by such crim- 
 inal baubles. What was his view of the proposal ? 
 He, who had never sought popularity, but whoa
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 319 
 
 popularity had sought, — he, who had entered public 
 life, not for the pleasure of exercising power, but for 
 the satisfaction of performing duty, — he, to be in- 
 sulted and outraged by such an estimate of his ser- 
 vices, and such a conception of his character! — why, 
 it could provoke in him nothing but an instantaneous 
 burst of indignation and abhorrence ! — and, in hia 
 reply, you will find that these emotions strain the 
 language of reproof beyond the stern courtesy of 
 military decorum. 
 
 The war ended, and our independence acknowl- 
 edged, the time came when American liberty, threat- 
 ened by anarchy, was to be reorganized in the 
 Constitution of the United States. As President of 
 the Convention which framed the Constitution, Wash- 
 ington powerfully contributed to its acceptance by the 
 States. The people were uncertain as to the equity 
 of its compromise of opposing interests, and adjust- 
 ment of clashing claims. By this eloquent and 
 learned man they were advised to adopt it ; by that 
 eloquent and learned ma', they were advised to re- 
 ject it; but there, at the end of the instrument itself, 
 and first among many eminent and honored names, 
 was the bold and honest signature of George Wash- 
 ington, a signature which always carried with it the 
 ntegrity and the influence of his character; and that
 
 t$20 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 was an argument stronger even than any furnished 
 by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. The Constitution 
 was accepted ; and Washington, whose fame, to use 
 Allston's familiar metaphor, was ever the shadow 
 cast by his excellence, was of course unanimously 
 elected President. This is no place to set forth the 
 glories of his civil career. It is sufficient to say, 
 that, placed amid circumstances where ignorance, van- 
 ity, or rashness would have worked ruinous mischief 
 and disunion, he consolidated the government. One 
 little record in his diary, just before he entered upon 
 his office, is a key to the spirit of his administration. 
 His journey from Mount Vernon to the seat of gov- 
 ernment was a triumphal procession. At New York 
 the air was alive with that tumult of popular ap- 
 plause, which has poisoned the integrity by intox- 
 icating the pride of so many eminent generals and 
 statesmen. "What was the feeling of "Washington ? 
 Did he have a misanthrope's cynical contempt for 
 the people's honest tribute of gratitude ? Did he 
 have a demagogue's fierce elation in being the object 
 of the people's boundless admiration ? No. His sen- 
 sations, he tells us, were as painful as they were 
 pleasing. His lofty and tranquil mind thought of t lie 
 possible reverse of the scene after all his exertions 
 to do good. The streaming flags, the loud acclam*
 
 OF THE REVOLUTION. 321 
 
 tions, the thunder of the cannon, and the shrill music 
 piercing through all other sounds, — these sent his 
 mind sadly forward to the solitude of his closet, 
 where, with the tender and beautiful austerity of his 
 character, he was perhaps to sacrifice the people's 
 favor for the people's safety, and to employ every 
 granted power of a Constitution he so perfectly un 
 derstood, in preserving peace, in restraining faction, 
 and in giving energy to all those constitutional re- 
 straints on popular passions, by which the wisdom of 
 to-morrow rules the recklessness of to-day. 
 
 In reviewing a life thus passed in enduring hard- 
 ship and confronting peril, fretted by constant cares 
 and worn by incessant drudgery, we are at first sad- 
 dened by the thought that such heroic virtue should 
 have been purchased by the sacrifice of happiness. 
 But we wrong Washington in bringing his enjoy- 
 ments to the test of our low standards. He has 
 everything for us to venerate, — nothing for our com- 
 miseration. He tasted of that joy which springs from 
 a sense of great responsibilities willingly incurred, 
 and great duties magnanimously performed. To him 
 was given the deep bliss of seeing the austere coun- 
 tenance of inexorable Duty melt into approving 
 smiles, and to him was realized the poet's rarturom 
 vision of her celestial compensations : — 
 
 U* o
 
 822 WASHINGTON AND THE PRINCIPLES 
 
 " Stern Lawgiver! yet thou dost wear 
 The Godhead's most benignant grace, 
 Nor know we anything so fair 
 As is the smile upon thy face." 
 
 It has been truly said that "men of intemperate 
 minds cannot be free ; their passions forge their fet- 
 ters " ; but no clank of any chain, whether of avarice 
 or ambition, gave the least harshness to the move- 
 ment of Washington's ample mind. In him America 
 has produced at least one man, whose free soul was 
 fit to be Liberty's chosen home. As was his indi- 
 vidual freedom, so should be our national freedom. 
 We have seen all along, that American liberty, in 
 its sentiment and idea, is no opinionated, will-strong, 
 untamable passion, bursting all bounds of moral re- 
 straint, and hungering after anarchy and license, but 
 a creative and beneficent energy, organizing itself in 
 laws, professions, trades, arts, institutions. From its 
 extreme practical character, however, it is liable to 
 contract a taint which has long vitiated English free- 
 dom. To the Anglo-Saxon mind, Liberty is not apt 
 to be the enthusiast's mountain nymph, with cheeks 
 wet with morning dew and clear eyes that mirror 
 the heavens, but rather is she an old dowager lady. 
 fatly invested in commerce and manufactures, and 
 oeevishly fearful that enthusiasm will reduce her es-
 
 OP THE REVOLUTION. 323 
 
 thblishraent, and panics cut off her dividends. No* 
 the moment property becomes timid, agrarianism be- 
 comes bold ; and the industry which liberty has cre- 
 ated, liberty must animate, or it will be plundered 
 by the impudent and rapacious idleness its slavish 
 fears incite. Our political institutions, again, are but 
 the body of which liberty is the soul ; their preser- 
 vation depends on their being continually inspired by 
 the light and heat of the sentiment and idea whence 
 they sprung ; and when we timorously suspend, ac- 
 cording to the latest political fashion, the truest and 
 dearest maxims of our freedom at the call of expe- 
 diency or the threat of passion, — when we convert 
 politics into a mere game of interests, unhallowed by 
 a single great and unselfish principle, — we may be 
 Bure that our worst passions are busy " forging our 
 fetters"; that we are proposing all those intricate 
 problems which red republicanism so swiftly solves, 
 and giving Manifest Destiny pertinent hints to shout 
 new anthems of atheism over victorious rapine. The 
 liberty which our fathers planted, and for which they 
 sturdily contended, and under which they grandly 
 conquered, is a rational and temperate, but brave 
 and unyielding freedom, the august mother of insti- 
 tutions, the hardy nurse of enterprise, the sworn ally 
 of justice and order ; a Liberty that lifts her awful
 
 324 WASHINGTON AND THE REVOLUTION. 
 
 md rebuking face equally upon the cowards who 
 would sell, and the braggarts who would pervert, her 
 precious gifts of rights and obligations; and this lib- 
 erty we are solemnly bound at all hazards to pro- 
 tect, at any sacrifice to preserve, and by all just 
 means to extend, against the unbridled excesses of 
 that ugly and brazen hag, originally scorned and de- 
 tested by those who unwisely gave her infancy a 
 home, but who now, in her enormous growth and 
 favored deformity, reels with bloodshot eyes, and di- 
 shevelled tresses, and words of unshamed slavishness, 
 into halls where Liberty should sit throned!
 
 i 
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 Santa Barbara 
 
 STACK COLLECTION 
 
 THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW. 
 
 30m-8,'65(F6447s4)9482
 
 THIS BOOK MAY BE KEPT 
 
 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY 
 
 FACILITY 
 
 AA 000 087 849