5O CENTS. THE PONG A CHIEFS. AN INDIAN'S ATTEMPT TO APPEAL FROM THE TOMAHAWK TO THE COURTS, WITH SOME SUGGESTIONS TOWARDS A SOLUTION OF THE INDIAN QUESTION. IB 3T Z Y !_, 3T IF 1 IF. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY INSHTATHEAMBA (BRIGHT EYE.) AND DEDICATION BY .WENDELL PHILLIPS. BOSTON: LOCKWOOD, BROOKS, AND COMPANY. 1879. FANEUIL HALL RESOLUTIONS. At a largely attended meeting held in Faneuil Hall, Dec. 2, 1879, over which His Honor, Mayor Prince, presided, the following preamble and resolutions, written by Mr. W. H. Whereas, Great and inexcusable wrongs have been com mitted by the National Government and its agents upon peace ful tribes of Indians, in removing them, against their will and consent, from the lands they occupied to a sickly and malari ous climate ; and whereas, the petitions and remonstrances of the chiefs of these tribes have been totally disregarded ; and whereas, this action on the part of the government has pro duced great distress and suffering and death among these tribes, and has led to wars in which both white people and the Indians have suffered severe losses ; and whereas, the Indians have been denied the protection of law in the assertion of their just rights and privileges, it is hereby Resolved, That in the case of the Poncas we recognize the insufficiency of the treaties and promises of the government to protect them,- and therefore the necessity of placing them under the protection of our laws. Resolved, That the present system of agencies and trader- ships, placing the authority in the hands of one man, and com pelling the Indians to sell the products of their labor to him, and to buy all their necessary supplies from him, is detri mental to the welfare of the Indians, discouraging to honest labor, and corrupting in its tendencies to the government. Resolved, That the only solution of the Indian problem is to recognize the Indian as a fellow-citizen, and to accord to him the rights that are declared by the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Resolved, That while we heartily commend the Indian policy suggested by the Secretary of the Interior to educate the In dians, to convey to them in fee, individually, titles to their farms, and thereafter to treat them like other inhabitants of the United States under the laws of the land, we earnestly urge and declare that immediate measures should be taken to secure to them their legal rights and due protection and compensation under the law ; and especially to restore to the Poncas their former homes and property as indemnification for the wrong which the Secretary of the Interior says has been done them. STANDING BEAR AND HIS FAMILY, 1. Ta-du-mon-ie. 2. Ma-chii-nah-zhe. 3. Ma-he-du-ba. 4. Sust (Walk-in-the-wind.) (Standing Bear.) (Sunshine.) Standing Bet Orphan grand-son of Standing Bear. Only living child of Standing Bear. te. 5. Vo-zh6n-ga-du-ba. 's wife. (Light of the way.) Orphan neice of Standing Bear. THE PONCA CHIEFS. AN INDIAN'S ATTEMPT TO APPEAL FROM THE TOM AH A WK TO THE COURTS. A FULL HISTORY OF THE ROBBERY OF THE PONCA TRIBE OF INDIANS, WITH ALL THE PAPERS FILED AND EVIDENCE TAKEN IN THE STANDING BEAR HABEAS CORPUS CASE, AND FULL TEXT OF JUDGE DUNDY'S CELEBRATED DECISION, WITH SOME SUGGESTIONS TOWARDS A SOLUTION OF THE INDIAN QUESTION. BY Z Y L Y F F, WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY INSHTATHEAMBA (Bright Eyes), AND DEDICATION BY WENDELL PHILLIPS. BOSTON: LOCKWOOD, BROOKS & CO. 1880. Copyright, 1879. By LOCKWOOD, BROOKS & CO. 7/623 Bancroft Library TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, Those who love liberty and intend that their Gov ernment shall protect every man on its soil and ex- ecute justice between man and man, THIS NARRATIVE, With an Introduction, written by an Indian Girl, of the wrongs suffered at the hands of the Government by the Ponoas, in consequence of which one-third of the tribe died within the last eighteen months, and the rest have endured and still endure cruel and wast ing oppression, 18 RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED, as a fair specimen of the system of injustice, oppres sion, and robbery which the Government calls "its Indian Policy;" which has covered it with disgrace as incompetent, cruel, faithless, never keeping its treaties, and systematically and shamelessly violating its most solemn promises; has earned the contempt and detesta tion of all honest men and the distrust and hate of the Indian tribes. WETOELL PHJLLIFS. CONTENTS. CHAPTER PAGB DEDICATION, ...... iii INTRODUCTION, ...... v I. STANDING BEAR'S FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH THE INDIAN RING, ..... 1 II. STANDING BEAR FINDS A FRIEND IN THE EDITOR OF A WESTERN PAPER, . . 17 III. A FLANK MOVEMENT ON THE INDIAN RING, 37 IV. MR. HAYT'S ASSAULT ON STANDING BEAR, AND THE RJEPLY THE OLD CHIEF MADE, 53 V. THE OMAHAS COME TO STANDING BEAR'S Am, ....... 62 VI. THE OMAHAS FRIGHTENED AT THE CLAIMS OF THE COMMISSIONER, . . .67 VII. STANDING BEAR'S RELIGION WHAT ARMY OFFICERS THINK OF HIM, . . .71 VIII. STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL TO THE COURTS, 77 IX. WHAT THE ATTORNEYS HAD TO SAY TO THE COURT, ....... 103 X. STANDING BEAR RELEASED DECISION OF JUDGE ELMER S. DUNDY, . . .106 XL THE ORDER OF RELEASE STANDING BEAR'S FAREWELL ADDRESSES, . . 128 APPENDIX, ....... 135 INTRODUCTION. THIS little book is only a simple narration of facts concerning some of my people. Many of the transactions recorded in it came under my own observation, my uncle, White Swan, being one of the chiefs who underwent so much suf fering after being left in the Indian Territory. Wrongs more terrible than those related here have been practised on others of my people, but they have had no writer to make them known. I wish for the sake of my race, that I could introduce this little book into every home in the land, because in these homes lies the power to remedy the evil shown forth in these pages. The people are the power which move the mag istrates who administer the laws. It is a little thing, a simple thing, which my people ask of a nation whose watchword is lib erty ; but it is endless in its consequences. They ask for their liberty, and law is liberty. " We did not know of these wrongs," say the magis trates. Is not that only the cry of " Am I my brother's keeper?" For years the petitions of vii INTRODUCTION. v iii my people have gone up unnoticed, unheeded by all but their Creator, and now at last a man of your race has arisen, who has sho vm faith enough in humanity to arouse the nation from the sin of its indifference. Thank God, it was only indiffer- ence, and not hatred, which withheld from an oppressed and unfortunate race, justice and mercy. May those who read this story, when they think of the countless happy homes which cover this continent, give help to a homeless race, who have no spot on earth they can call their own. INSHTATHEAMBA (Bright Eyes). THE PONCA CHIEFS. CHAPTER I. STANDING BEAR'S FIKST ENCOUNTER WITH THE INDIAN KING. Ix the autumn of 1876, the Indians on the Ponca reservation in Southern Dakota were at work on their farms as usual. It was as peace ful and happy a community as could be found anvwhere. Most of their children were attend ing school, and their church was in a flourishing condition. How these people were robbed of their wealth and a large portion of them sent to their graves, through the tools of the Indian Ring, it is the object of these pages to relate. One Sunday the Indians went to their church as usual, to hear the words of the minister, but some of the words which he said that tribe will never forget. He told them that he had heard that they were to be driven from their 1 2 THE PONCA CHIEFS. homes and sent far to the south, never to come back again. He said he was exceedingly sorry for them, as they had been honest, industrious, frugal, hard-working, and had just gotten themselves nice houses and farms. He did not know that he could help them. He could only pity them. Under all circumstances he advised them to do that which was right, and trust in God, that in the end he would protect them from their oppressors. Consternation seized upon the whole commun ity. Runners were dispatched, and in a few hours afterwards every member of the Ponca tribe had heard the news. The one universal sentiment was: " We will not leave the home of our fathers to go to a strange land, never to return." The chiefs and head men came together and questioned the minister, but he knew nothing more than he had already told. Somebody had ordered them to be taken to the Indian Territory. Soon after a great council was called, and some men purporting to come from Wash ington appeared, and said an order had been issued to take the tribe to the Indian Territory. Standing Bear, White Eagle and other chiefs absolutely refused to go. Standing Bear said: " This land is ours, we have never sold it. "We have STANDING BEAR AND THE INDIAN RING. 3 our houses and our homes here. Our fathers and some of our children are buried here. Here we wish to live and die. We have harmed no man. We have kept our treaty. We have learned to work. We can make a good living here. We do not wish to sell our land, and we think no man has a right to take it from us. Here we will live, and here we will die." Then these men told them that the Indian Territory was a much better country. That they could raise much more grain and not work near so hard. That if they once saw it they would not want to stay in Dakota, and many other things of like nature. Finalty, they pro posed that the chiefs should go down to the Indian Territory and look at the country. Then, if they did not like it, and did not wish to go, they might stay where they were. They told them that if they went down there, the Great Father would buy their land in Dakota and pay them for it, and give them all the land they needed in the Indian Terri tory. If they would just go down and look at the country all the trouble would be ended. They could sell their land then or not, just as they pleased. After further consultation it was agreed that ten of the leading men should go down there and look at the country. These men took them to the territory. They showed them a portion of country, and THE PONCA CHIEFS. wanted to know what they thought of it. The chiefs replied they did not like it at all. They did not think it was as good as where they were located in Dakota. Standing Bear's account of what occurred at this time is as follows: " These men then talked entirely different from what they did in Dakota. They said, you shall trade your land in Dakota for land here. You can go out there and choose what you want, but you shall trade. Your tribe will be brought down here, and you may as well choose your land now. I told them that we could not come. I had seen that a great many people down there were sick. The land they showed us was stony, and I did not believe we could make a living on it. I was afraid my people would get sick and die. We could not come there. "Then the men grew very angry, and said if we did not agree to come they would go off and leave us there to starve. They would not take us back home. We said it would be better for ten of us to die than that the whole tribe, all the women and little children, should be brought there to die, and die we all would, right there, rather than do what they asked. " Then they went off and said we might stay there and die. They would not take us back. I sent the interpreter to them, and told them that they had brought us far from our own country on the cars, and if they would not take us back they should at least give us some money to pay our way. They said they would not give me one cent of money. They had said they would take us from the Indian Territory to see the Great STANDING BEAR AND f HE INDIAN RING. 5 Father. I sent and asked if they would take us to Washington, and told them if they would, and the Great Father said we must come to the Indian Terri tory, then, I supposed, we must come. They replied that the Great Father had nothing to do with the matter. They would not take us anywhere. We could stay there and die. I sent again, and told them if they would not take us" back, nor give us any money, to give us a paper that we could show to white men and tell who we were, so they would not think we were hostile or intended to steal from them. They replied they would give us nothing, not even a paper. "Now, there were two very old men with us, who could not travel on foot at all. I sent to them and told them we would walk back, but that these two old men could not walk and they must care for them. We could not carry them on our backs, and they must take them, and I sent the old men to them, and told them to stay with them. They took these two old men and went off and left us. " None of us had a cent of money, and we had no in terpreter, so we could not speak a word to any man. The next morning we started on our long journey. It was in the winter. White men were suspicious of us. They thought we were vagabond Indians, who will travel round to beg and won't work. Very few of them would give us anything. Every day we travelled on we grew weaker, and had to go slower. We got a few pieces of bread. What we lived on was corn. We would take it and pound it between stones. We slept out on the prairie without shelter. A few times we foiled haystacks to sleep in. It took us just fifty days to reach the Otoe Agency in Southern Nebraska. The last few days we 6 THE PONCA CHIEFS. were very weak, and could walk only a few miles. When we got there, we found that these men had sent word to the Agent there to have nothing to do with us; that we were bad Indians, and if we came there we should be driven off. But when the Agent saw how nearly starved we were, and looked at our bleed ing feet, for our moccasins wore out the first ten days, he took pity on us, and first gave us something to eat, and then asked us what bad things we had been doing. When we told him what had happened, he was much astonished, and said he would write a letter to Wash ington, and tell all how we had been treated. "The Otoes gave us horses and provisions, and we made the journey to the Omaha Agency in five days. We looked so bad when we got there that everybody w&s sorry for us. From there we sent a telegram to the President. The other seven who were with me went on up to the reservation on horseback, and Mr. Hamilton, the missionary to the Omahas, sent John Springer, an educated Omaha, with me to Sioux City to send the telegram. We stopped at the first station at which we reached the railroad, and sent the telegram. It cost $6.25. We asked the operator who sent it if anybody would stop it before it got to Washington, and he said, 'No, if they did, they would be put out of their place.' "John Springer went on with me to Sioux City, and we went to see the editor of the paper there (Sioux City Journal). We told him all about it, and he printed it in his paper. Springer gave me some money there, and left me, anjd I went on the cars up to Yankton. The men who took us to the Territory had returned and were there. A white man, whom I did not know, came STANDING BEAR AND THE INDIAN RING. 7 to me there, and said he had heard about our troubles. He said these men who were there were scoundrels. He knew every one of them. They were very bad men who got rich by swindling the Indians. He said he knew that we had never sold our land, or signed a treaty to go away, and the best thing for me was to go back to my farm, go to work, and pay no attention to what these men said, or what orders they gave, until some man came who had papers signed by the Presi dent. He said if these men had land, and another man should come and order them to leave it, they would knock him down, and that was the way they ought to be served ! " I went back to the Ponca Agency and these same men came there. They wanted to talk again. I said : ' What are you here for? What business have you to come here at all. I never sent for you. I don't want anything to do with you. You are all liars. You are all bad men. You have no authority from the Great Father. You came out here to cheat and steal. You can read and write, and I can't, and you think you know everything and I know nothing. If some man should take you a thousand miles from home, as you did me, and leave you in a strange country with out one cent of money, where you did not know the language and could not speak a word, you would never have got home in the world. You don't know enough. I want you to go off of this reservation. You have no business here, and don't come back until you bring a letter from the Great Father. Then if you want to buy my land, bring the money with you so I can see it. If I want to sell I will talk to you. If I don't I won't. This is my land. The Great Father did g THE PONCA CHIEFS. not give it to me. My people were here and ownefl this land before there was any Great Father. Wo sold him some land, but we never sold this. This ia mine. God gave it to me. When I want to sell it I will let you know. You are a rascal and a liar, and I want you to go off my land. If you were treating: a white man the way you are treating me, he would kill you, and everybody would say he did right. I will not do that. I will harm no white man, but this is my land, and I intend to stay here and make a good living for my wife and children. You can go.' " When I said this he was very angry, and the next morning he had Big Snake and me arrested. They took us down to Yankton, and brought us before eight officers. The head officer said : ' We have heard many complaints about you. We have had four letters mak ing complaints. What have you to say? I thought you were good and all trying to work. I have read in the papers that you have been badly treated, but these letters say exaclly the opposite.' "Then we told the soldiers all about it, and the soldiers were angry at what had been done, and the head officer said : ' I will send a telegram to Washington, but you will stay here until I hear from it. I will not put you in prison. That land is yours. I have a hard duty, but I am a soldier, and must obey orders. I would like to help you, but I cannot. I have known your tribe a long time, and you have all done well, and learned how to work. I know that is so. Some rascals are trying to swindle you out of your land and stock. I have seen things like this many times. It is very hard to see this, but I can't help it. When a white man has land he can stay on it, and if anybody else wants it STANDING BEAR AND THE INDIAN RING. 9 they have to pay him money for it, and he don't have to give it up until he gets the money, and I don't see why the same law will not apply to an Indian who has land.' ' ' The soldiers treated us very kindly, and after a little while we went back on the reservation. I don't know whether the head officer ever had from Washington an answer from his telegram. Then these men got up another council. The half-breeds who belong to the tribe are most all bad men; they are rascals, and go witn the agents and traders. At this council all the half- breeds took the side of these men. They all wanted to go to the Indian Territory. But not one of the Poncas would agree to go. At this council there was a white man who came to talk for us. He was a lawyer, and said he had been watching us for years, and he knew we were trying to do right. He said be would not see us swindled out of all we had, and not do any thing. "These men said to us that we were thieves and bad Indians, and the Commissioner had resolved to move us away from the white people. That the Sioux would come and kill us all unless they kept many soldiers to watch them, and that cost the Great Father much money, and that he did not have many soldiers any more, and what he had he wanted to fight for the white people, and not to protect bad Indians. "Then this lawyer answered back for us. He said he did not want to call them liars, but he believed they wera. If they had any authority for what they were doing, why did they not show the papers. They had none. They could not show an order of any kind. He would not say so positively, but he believed they were 10 THE PONCA CHIEFS. all of the same lot of thieves who had always been swindling the Indians. That reservation belonged to the Poncas. They had never gone to war with the whites, though everybody knew they had cause enough. Nobody could take it from them. Nobody could make them sell it. Even the Great Father could not do that. He said many other things, and talked a long while. He got very angry at last, and said they were thieves and scoundrels, and if they were served right they would every one be hung. Then they would not let him talk any more. "At last they said it was no use to talk any more. We must all go to the Indian Territory, and that was the end of the matter. It was no use for us to say we would not, because we must. We told them we would not go, and the council broke up. ' 'Soon after this the half-breeds belonging to the tribe, numbering ten men and their families, packed up and started. This white lawyer told us not to go, and he did not believe they would try to make us go. He said for us to do what we thought best, and not rely on him, but it was his belief that if we went on with our work and paid no attention to them they would not do anything. He said, if you want to go, go, and if you don't, stay right where you are. It will be time enough when, they begin to try to make you go. No body will shoot you while you are at work. If the sol diers come and give you orders, then you will have to obey.' " We talked over the matter very much, and we were very sad. After a little while some soldiers came to the Agency, and the interpreter said they had come to go to war with us, if we did not go. We could not STANDING BEAR AND THE INDIAN RING. H fight. We were all farming and had but few guns. Everybody was working hard. It was in the spring. Many had sowed their spring wheat, some had planted corn, and made gardens. The children were going to school. One day about noon, 1 had just come in from the field; my brother was still at work, and another man was plowing for me. My wife was gelling dinner, and a man rode up. He said the officer liad given an order that we were to load up everything we had and bring it 10 the Agency building. I supposed it came from tho soldiers, aud I unhitched my horses from the plows and hitched, them to the wagons, and loaded in all I had. There were some things the government had given us. I do not count them. They had given them to us, and I suppose they had the right to take them back. Among them were the threshing machines, reap ers, mowers, and the mill. Then I had some things which I Lad bought with the grain and stock I had raised and sold. These were mine, and no man had any right to take them away. However, I obeyed the order, and took them all to the Agency. Within two or three days I had them all there. These were the things which were mine and which they took away: " One house (I built it with my own hands. It took me a long time, for I didn't know how very well). It was twenty feet by forty, with two rooms; four cows, three steers. ei "WASHINGTON, D. C., Dec. 18th, 1877. ) " This is to certify that Standing Bear is a chief of the Ponca Indians. This tribe is at peace with the United States, and Standing Bear is recognized as a chief of said tribe, whose influence has been to preserve peace and harmony between the Ponca Indians and the United States, and as such is entitled to the confidence of all persons whom he may meet. * * * * (Seal.) " E. A. HAYT, Commissioner." It was remarked that " Mr. Hayt gave him a 58 THE PONCA CHIEFS. good character." Standing Bear did not seem to understand, for he replied, "The Commis sioner did not give me a good character. I got my character by a long life devoted to the ad vancement of my tribe. Many years before other white men have said the same about me. They could not say differently if they told the truth." He then showed the following documents: "To whom it may concern: " This is to certify that Standing Bear, the bearer hereof, is an Indian, full blood, of the Ponca tribe, and a chief of said tribe. He is a reliable and trust worthy man, of industrious habits, and rare zeal in set- ting a good example to the Indians and inciting them to industrious and civilized habits. He and bis wife are one in the good work of providing comfortably for their home and children, who are likewise taught to work^and respect all who do. If the Poncas had no other councilors but such men as Sta'nding Bear, their condition would not long be one of helpless dependence. I most heartily commend him to the kindness of all to whom he may present this. ''A. J. CARRIER, U. 8. Indian Agent." "Ponca Agency, D. T., March 30th, 1876." ' ' To all whom this may come: " The bearer, Ma-chu-na-zha (Standing Bear), is one of the liead chiefs of the Ponca tribe of Indians. He is civil, quiet and well-behaved, a warm friend of the whites, and loyal to the government. He is deserving STANDING BEAR'S DEFENCE. 59 of respect and kind treatment from all to whom he may present himself whenever traveling through the settlements. . H. HUGO, First Lieutenant, TJ- S. Army" Standing Bear exhibited a large number of these documents, all speaking of him in the very highest terms, some of them dating back as far as 1865. After they were examined Standing Bear remarked: '"You see that the Commissioner did not give me my character; he only certified to what was true." The translation of the letter was continued, and that part was read where Mr. Hayt says: "There being no way whereby their request to be sent back North could be complied with," Standing Bear smiled and said: " No one asked the Commissioner to send me back North. All I wanted was permission to come. Now I am already North, and that difficulty is overcome. If the Commissioner can't send me North, he seems to know of a very quick way to send me South." Coming to that part where Mr. Hayt says "large sums were expended," Standing Bear said, "That may be so, but all the money we ever got was $6.25 a head. There was a good deal of money at the Agency. I know that we never got it. Besides I don't want the Com- 60 THE PONCA CHIEFS. missioner's money. All I ask is to be allowed to make my own living. I can take care of myself if they don't keep me under arrest. The statement of a supply of cattle and agri cultural implements is untrue." In regard to the disaffections of other chiefs against Standing Bear, he said: "In every tribe of Indians there are two parties. First, those who understand that it is necessary, if the Indians are not all to be exterminated, to go to work, to learn to read and write and count money, to be like white men. Those who think about these things at all, know that the game is all gone, and that our mode of life must change. Then there are always some who believe in the old traditions, who think the Great Spirit will be displeased with them if they do like white men. They want to retain their old habits and religion. They hate to work. They want to lie in the shade in the summer, and near the fire in the winter, and make their women wait on them. These two classes gather around the chiefs who represent these two things. There are a few of these Indians who do not want to work among the Poncas. They have a chief, and he don't like me, because I tell him and his band that they are not good Indians, and if the tribe should follow his advice there would soon be not one Ponca left to tell what had become of us. The bad agents, half-breeds, and all those who make their liv ing from the money which is sent to tribes which are not advanced enough to make their own living, give a great deal of encouragement to this sort of Indians, STANDING BEAR'S DEFENCE. 61 and pretend that they have a great deal more influence than they really have. I represent in the Ponca tribe the foremost of those who want to support themselves, to send their children to school, to build houses, to get property and all kinds of stock around us, and to be independent. It may be that those lazy, bad In dians told the Commissioner that I had no influence. They would do so if they had a chance. But if I could go down to the Territory, and tell all the tribe to follow me who wanted to work and send their chil dren to school, nine out of every ten would come with me. A few would object, but there are not more than fifteen or twenty of them. White Eagle thinks the same way about these matters that I do. He is a good man, and has great influence in the tribe. The Com missioner may have intended no wrong to me in mak ing the statement. He may have been so informed, but if he had issued an order for my arrest he would soon have learned whether I had friends in the tribe or not. There might have been trouble, for I could not have been with them to have told them what to do. My voice has always been for peace. Some others have advised differently." 62 THE PONCA CHIEFS. CHAPTER V. THE OMAHAS COME TO STANDING BEARDS AID. THE next day after tliis conversation, the fol lowing petition from the Omaha tribe was re ceived. The petition was drawn up and forwarded by Chas. P. Morgan, who is a full- blooded Omaha. OMAHA AGENCY, April 21, 1879. " To the friends of the Poncas now held as prisoners at Omaha barracks: " We, the undersigned, Omaha Indians, for ourselves, and on behalf of the Omaha tribe, wish publicly to declare that in consideration of the relationship exist ing between our tribe and those Poncas, and under a sense of the dictates of common humanity to our race, we are anxious for their return to our reservation, nnd are willing to share with them our lands, and to assist them until they can, by their industry, support them selves. They are our brothers and our sisters, our un cles and our cousins, and although we are called sav ages we feel that sympathy for our persecuted brethren that should characterize Christians, and are willing to share what we possess with them if they can only be allowed to return and labor, improve and provide for RELIEF FROM THE OMAHAS. 63 themselves where they may live in peace, enjoy good health, and the opportunity of educating their children up to a higher state of civilization. They came here to our reservation about the first of March, from the In dian Territory, and as they believe from the jaws of death, even bringing sickness with them. We received them kindly and hospitably, and afforded- them such assistance as we could in the way of land to raise a crop this summer, and they were preparing to go to work to sow and plant when they were arrested and taken from us by soldiers without any just cause or provocation that we or they know of. Having learned with thankfulness that the good people of Omaha, and the friends of humanity and justice deeply sympathized with and enlisted in the cause of these Poncas, we feel encouraged to appeal to you for a continuance of your efforts in their behalf, until their right to live among their friends and brothers and enjoy the fruits of their labor is restored to them. " Fire-Chief, Standing Hawk, " Yellow Smoke, Hard- Walker, "Ga-he-ga, Shon-ga-skah, ' ' Paw-nee-num-puzzhe Du-ba- mo-ni, " Ta-o-ka-hah, Um-pa-tun-ga, " Wah-ha-wn-ne, Mowad-da-na, " Num-ba-du-'.a, Hog-ga-mo-ui, " Gali-ke-a-mo-ni, Wah-jap-pa, " Wah-ke-da, Nah-ha-wa-kah, " Mah-pe-a-hog-ga, Ta-noo-ga." The New York Herald made the following comment upon this petition: " The appeal of the Omaha Indians in favor of their 64 THE PONCA CHIEFS. kindred, the Poncas, is one of the most extraordinary statements ever published in America. Whether some portion of it may not be the work of a white man we are not prepared to deny ; but the facts are of more consequence than the rhetoric, and these are simply that a tribe of Indians, nominally civilized, but still savage in the estimation of many whites, are willing and anxious to recieve the Poncas on their reservation, allot lands to them, and assist them until they can make crops and support themselves. Many white men in Nebraska might have made the same offer without hurting themselves, and the news of such a deed would have gone through the entire Indian country with benefit to the dominant race. But white men did not do it. Church members talked and petitioned, but not an acre of laud did they offer. It was re served for a band of heathen redskins, who have hardly yet forgotten the war-whoop, to emphasize that sympathy which civilization and religion have talked about and only talked. The world moves, but civilization seems sometimes to stand still, while savages pass to he front and into the position of honor." Rev. J. Owen Dorsey, who is engaged in linguistic labors, preserving various Indian lan guages, was at the Omaha Agency the day the Poncas were arrested. Long Runner refused to obey the order to go. He was surrounded and a gun was placed at his head. He told them to kill him there, for he would rather die than go back. He was' tied and a guard placed RELIEF FROM THE OMAHAS. 65 over him. Word was sent to the others to re port and be ready to start at noon. Mr. Dorsey wrote a letter to Col. Meacham, editor of The Council Fire, who was at the time in Washington, in which he said: "I saw them leave to-day. All but the prisoner (Long Runner) went about half a mile in advance of the soldiers without a guard and without a struggle, save that which was going on in their own hearts. Their appeals to me were* touching. Said Standing Bear: ' My friend, you know us. We can't live down there where the Great Father put us. So we came here to live and work the land." Mr. Dorsey asked Col. Meacham to see the Secretary of the Interior and Commissioner and appeal to them in Standing Bear's behalf. Col. Meacham made the following report of his interview with them: "They gave me a patient hearing. I read your (Rev. Mr. Dorsey's) letter to them a second time. Mr. Schurz remarked : "That is a sad case. I feel deeply for the Poncas. They are peaceable and quiet, and I wish I could better their condition." Mr. Hayt "There is no use of talking about the Poncas going North. They must remain where they are. We have expended large sums of money for them in their new home. They have become ac climated (we//). They are there by law(?). They cannot be sent North without authority of Congres 66 THE PONCA CHIEFS. They must stay where they are. Those who have left must be taken back. If we allow them to stay away the others will follow." Col. Meacham "If a mistake has been made, we made it. The Indian was in our power. He was help less, and is still helpless. He is at our mercy. He should not pay the peDalty of our mistakes. We have it in our power to relieve him of the wrong. True, we cannot call Lack the dead, but we can do justice to the living. Let us do right became it is rigid" Mr. Hayt "Right is for the Poncas to stay where we have placed them. If we suffer them to leave their homes, the Pawnees, and Cheycnnes and Ncz Perces must go next. We cannot do that. It was a mistake to give the Sioux the Ponca country. This mistake was made by Gen. Sherman before our administration began. I am sure Congress will cot consent to send all these Indians back North. We must reconcile them to stay where they are in the Indian Territory." Col. Meacham "Gentlemen, I submit that there is a principle involved in this matter. I doubt the right of any man to say that another man shall not live where God placed him. If the Pawnees, Poncas and Nez Perces cannot live in the Indian Territory we ought to move them out. " Col. Meacham closes his report of this inter view with these words: " The Commissioner insisted that the Poncas must return. I will make another effort. Ever yours, for God's children, "A. B. MEACHAM."* *Note: Mr. Meacham afterward visited the Poncas in the Indian Territory and made reports which greatly injured their cause. THE PONCA CHIEFS. 67 CHAPTER VI. THE OMAHAS FRIGHTENED AT THE CLAIMS OP THE COMMISSIONER. WHEN the letter of Commissioner Hayt was published, the educated Omahas were fright ened, because it claimed absolute power over their bodies, to remove them anywhere, at the will of the Commissioner, and one of them wrote a letter to Omaha, inquiring if the Com missioner, just because she was an Indian, could order her to the Indian Territory, New Mexico, or any place he pleased, and she could not ap peal to the law for protection. She stated that if it was true, rather than live in constant dread of such a fate, she would go to Canada and live under the protection of the British gov ernment, where this Commissioner could not lay his hands on her. She was informed that the object of this suit was to ascertain that very thing. Actuated by a similar feeling, another Indian girl prepared a statement concerning the Poncas, 68 THE PONCA CHIEFS, which she proposed to publish. Not knowing the nature of the document, she was requested through Mr. Dorsey to forward it to the editor, that it might be submitted to counsel. The fol lowing is a verbatim copy of her letter and the statement which she prepared, excepting the blank for the name: OMAHA AGENCY, April 29th, 1879. "MB. , DEAR Sm. Mr. Dorsey requested me to send you the inclosed copy of a statement made by the Ponca chiefs at my house on their return from the Indian Territory about two years ago. We had it published at their desire in one of the Sioux City papers at the time, and I kept the original, thinking it might be of use at some future time. I send also the telegram which the chiefs sent to Washington about the same time. On reaching their home after leaving here, they were ordered to get ready to go to the Indian Territory, and soldiers were sent to them to force them to go. I feel a deep interest in the subject, as White Swan, one of the chiefs who was taken down, is'my uncle. My father and I went to Columbus to bid him and his family good-bye on their way down, and the soldiers were with them there. My uncle says they never signed any paper, petition, or treaty to be taken down to Indian Territory, although it is said a petition signed with their names was seen in Washington. The chiefs told us that when the white men were trying to make them sign the paper, they were asked to allow the Ponca tribe to live with the Omahas. They, the white men, told the chiefs, 'No, the Omahas are to be taken down too.' The chiefs THE OMAHAS FRIGHTENED. 69 then asked to be allowed to live with the Sioux and mingle with them as one people ; that the two tribes were formerly enemies, but they had made peace with them and would rather live with them than be sent to Indian Territory. This also was denied them, and they were told to get ready to go. " The statement shows how much they trusted in the justice of the white people, believing that the wrong done them had been done only by a few, and without authority. I do hope some action will be taken in the matter soon. Yours respectfully, " BRIGHT EYES." STATEMENT OF PONCA CHIEFS. "We, the Ponca chiefs -and principal men of the tribe, desire to make the following statement of facts concerning ourselves in all good faith, hoping it may come to the ears of the President of the United States, whom we are glad to learn is a good man and anxious to do justice to all. " Some time ago there came a man to our reserve, who said he was sent by the Great Father at Washing ton to make a treaty with us for our land. We said the President was our friend, and this was our home, but we would hear what he had to say. If he wanted our land we would go to Washington and talk about it. He told us he was ordered to do what he did, seemed sincere and friendly, and to satisfy us he sent .a telegram to Washington, and after getting an an swer, he said he would take ten of our chiefs to see the Indian Territory, where we could select a new home, and that the money for our present journey would be furnished from the Sioux's funde . 70 THE PONCA CHIEFS. " We got ready and started, wishing first to visit the Omaha reserve, but this was not allowed us. After some days we reached the country of the Osages, and looked over the country and found it stony and broken, and not a country that we thought we could make a living in. We saw the Osages there, and they were without shirts, their skin burned, and their hair stood up as if it had not been combed since they were little children. We did not wish to sink so low as they seemed to be." The remainder of the statement is only a repetition of that of Standing Bear, made in the first chapter. The statement is signed by White Eagle, Standing Buffalo, Standing Bear, Smoke Maker, White Swan, Big Elk, and Ga- he-ga. The following is the telegram which Stand ing Bear said that he and John Springer sent to the President, and which was also enclosed in the letter of Bright Eyes. "To the President of the United States: " Was it by your authority that the men you sent to take us down to the Indian Territory, to select a home, left us there without money, and without an interpreter or pass, to find our way back as best we could? And did you tell him to say to us: 'If you don't select a home here, you shall be driven from your present home at the point of the bayonet?' Please answer, as we are in trouble. THE OMAHAS FRIGHTEKED. 71 " We have been fifty days in getting back as far as the Atoes ; tired, hungry, shoeless and footsore, and with heart and spirit broken and sad." This was signed with the same names as the above statement. Perhaps it would be well here to refer to the remarks of Gen. Crook, at the close of the council" with Standing Bear, when he was first brought to Fort Omaha. After Standing Bear's brief rehearsal of his treatment by the government, Gen. Crook said: "I have heard all this story before. It is just as they represent it. It has long since been reported to Washington. They haw all the facts in Washington, and it would do no good for me to intercede. I might sencj. a telegram, but it is likely to do more harm than good." Many who read the report of Gen. Crook's remarks in the papers, thought he was mis taken about the facts being known at Washing ton, that it was almost beyond belief that the authorities would countenance such treat ment of the Indians. These documents show how truthfully he spoke. 72 THE PONCA CHIEFS. CHAPTER VII. STANDING BEAR'S RELIGION WHAT ARMY OFFI CERS THINK OF HIM. As much had been said about these Poncas being savages, Standing Bear was asked to state his religious belief. Without a moment's reflection, he spoke as follows: "There is one God, and He made both Indians and white men. We were all made out of the dust of the earth. I once thought differently. I believed there were happy hunting-grounds, where there were plenty of game, and plenty to eat, no sickness, no death, and no pain. The best of the Indians would go to these happy hunting-grounds. I thought that those who were bad would never live any more; that when they died that was the end of them. But I have learned that these things are not so, and that God wishes us to love Him and obey His commandments, follow the narrow road, work for Him on earth, and we shall have happiness after we die. I am told His Son died for us, died that we might live. I want to try and do something for Him, to be like Him, follow in His foot steps as nearly as I can. I think there is but one God. I need help to do right, and I pray to Him that he will STANDING BEAR'S RELIGION. 73 help me for His Son's sake. I do not wish to do any thing wrong. I wish to follow the 'narrow road. It is the road of happiness. God never does anything wrong. He knows what is best for me. No man can understand God, or know why He deals with us as He does. Sometimes what we think is the worst is the best for us. When I was arrested by the soldiers and brought down here, I thought for a little while that God had forsaken me, but now I see tnat, perhaps, it is the best thing for me and my people. If they would only hearken to His word, they would find that all is for their good. He sees me all the time . He watches over me, and knows all I do. He knows my thoughts. He knows when I think wicked thoughts. He knows it all. If He did not watch over me, and take care of me, I should die. I want Him to watch over me, and take care of me. and I believe He always will. He helps me. I can do nothing without His help. I love His truth. 1 hate lies. I wish to follow the truth al ways. God has control of the whole earth, and every thing is in His power. He sees over all things at once, every man, woman, and child, and knows their thoughts and actions, and everything they do. He watches over me wherever I go. He sees me here to-day. He has been with me through all my wanderings, and has taken care of me. He has seen how I have been taken away from my land. Through all this He has been close to me. When I have felt that I had no friends, I remembered that He was my Father. His people have been good to me, but the people of the devil are trying to send me to hell. They have tried to make me believe that God tells them what to do, as though God would put a man where he would be destroyed, 74 THE PONCA CHIEFS. and they have destroyed many already, but they can not deceive me. God put me here, and intends for me to live on the land they are trying to cheat me out of. "I pray to God every day for Him to help me to regain my rights, if I am worthy of it. For His Son's sake I have asked it. He made me and the whiles, and although we are of a different color, I think men's hearts are all alike. If I were to go back to my land to-day, the first thing I would do would be to fall down on my knees and thank God for it. I think in the future, as I grow in years, I will try to love Him more and more every day, do that which is right, and be afraid to do that which is wrong." He was asked how long he had held these views, and he replied, " Since the missionary came up from Omaha Agency, about eight years ago, and told me the right way." " How many of the tribe think the same way on this subject that you do?" "Only a few. It is a hard thing to say, but I will tell you the truth. Some of these have died since we went down to the Territory. We had no missionary down there, and no one to talk to us about God. My boy, who died there, would get a few in a tent and talk to them sometimes and tell them the right way the best he knew how. He used to pray with me very often, and read to me out of the Testament. Some of the people who were sick prayed all the time when they were dy-' ing. They asked God to take them away from there if it was His will, or to end their sufferings speedily. STANDING BEAR'S RELIGION. 7,3 When any one came to our old reservation to talk of God, I would always find a place for Mm to speak, and get the people to come." By request, Lieut. Carpenter, who was de tailed to make the arrest of Standing Bear and his party, made the following statement in writing: " On the 23d day of March, 1879, acting under or ders of my superior officers, I arrested a band of twenty-nine Ponca Indians, under Standing Bear, at the Omaha Indian Agency, and brought them to Fort Omaha, Neb. At the time of the arrest, while holding a council with the party, Standing Bear made an able speech to me, in which he reviewed the situation of his people, and declared their desire to remain where they were;' although consenting under vigorous protest to accompany me. He stated that he had alwaj's been a friend to the whites, and that on one occasion he found a poor soldier on the plains in midwinter, with both feet frozen, and nearly starved to death; that he carried him in his arms to camp and took care of him for several weeks until he died. 'And now,' said he. 'you, a soldier, come here to drive me from the land of my fathers.' "When arrested they were in a pitiable condition from the effects of chills and fever. Over half of the adults suffered from this disease on the march to Omaha, and, notwithstanding the best medical treat ment while prisoners, many are still in feeble health. 76 THE PONCA CHIEFS. Before leaving their camp, the women and children cried piteously at the prospect of going back to the Indian Territ ory. They must have suffered greatly during their winter march, but no charge of depreda tions while en route has ever been made against them. ''From my personal knowledge of these people while under my charge, I consider them further ad vanced in civilization than any other tribe west of the Mississippi, with the single exception of the Omahas, to whom they are related by the band of common origin. The men are industrious and willing to work, at any thing they can find to do. The children conduct themselves well, and the women are modest in their demeanor and neat in appearance and domestic habits. "Fort Omaha, Neb., May 8th, 1879." By reference to the dates it will be seen that the above statement was written after these Indians had been under Lieut. Carpenter's charge over two months, so that he had had ample opportunities to observe them closely, and know of their character and habits. Every man among them able to work has been at work since their arrival at Fort Omaha, being employed by the contractors on the govern ment buildings. One, who worked a few days, was forced to quit on account of the return of malarial disease. THE PONCA CHIEFS. 77 CHAPTER VIII. STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL TO THE COTJBTS. THE case came to trial on the 30th of April, 1879, and lasted two days, including one evening session. The following chapter contains a ver batim report of the evidence: THE EVIDENCE. Willie W. Hamilton, sworn on behalf of the relators, and examined in chief by Mr. Webster, testified as follows : Q. You may state your age. J.. Twenty-two. Q. Where do you live? A. At the Omaha Agency. That is where I have lived for the last twelve years. Q. What are you engaged in at the Agency? A. I have been in a store for the last six years, sell ing goods. Q. To what people were you selling goods? A. The Omaha Indians. Q. On their reservation? A. On their reservation, yes, sir. Q. Are you acquainted with the Omaha language? A. Yes, sir. 78 THE PONCA CHIEFS. The Court Do the Poncas speak the same language? JL. Yes, sir. Mr. Webster You are able then to talk with both Omahas and Poncas in their native tongue? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know the parties that are under arrest at the present time at Omaha? A. I do. Q. How long have you known them? A. I became acquainted with them since they came down here, twenty-two days ago. .1 saw them when they came to the Agency, but not to talk with them or be come acquainted with them. Q. When was it t-hat they came to the Agency? A. They came to the Agency in March, I think. Q. That is last March? A. Yes, sir, I think it was in the fore part of the mouth. I won't be certain. Q. Where does your father live? A. My father lives at the Agency, or about three miles from the Agency. Q. How long has he been living there? A. For the same length of time I have twelve years. Q. What has been his business? A. He is- a missionary to the Indians. Q. How long has he been such? A. He has been missionary among the lowas and Oniahas for over thirty years. Q. State the condition of these Poncas when the}' arrived at the Omaha Agency, *so far as you observed? A. So far as I know they were in a very bad condi tion when they came there. STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 79 Q. What property did they have when they came there? , A. All they had was their horses and wagons and tents. Q. How were they supplied as to clothing? A. They had blankets, some of them, and some had coats ; those that had coats wore pants, and were dressed in citizens' clothes. Q. DC you know where they came from when they arrived at the Agency? A. They said they came from the Indian Territory. Q. Do you know how they came up from the Indian Territory to the Agency? A. They came up in wagons, some of them horseback, and others 011 foot. Q. State the number that came. A. I don't know exactly the number that came I think about thirty-five. Q. How many were men, about the number approxi mately, and how many were women, and how many were children? A. Ten or twelve were men, I think. I don't know how many were children, or how many were women. I was not among them much at first, and I did not pay any attention to them. I think there must have been between twelve and fifteen women. Q. You may state whether or not they were divided into families at the time when they came whether they were married and composed families as man and wife? A. They were. Q. And the children were the children of these families ? 80 THE PONCA CHIEFS. A- Yes, sir, some of them some were orphans, liv ing with their relations. Q. Which ones do you speak of as being orphans? . A- There were two orphans came with them. There is one (indicating a young Indian boy who was present with the relators in ,the court room) sitting in the woman's lap. The other is at camp. Q. Whose son is this one here? A. He is a grandson of Standing Bear's. Q. Which one is Standing Bear? A. That one in the corner (indicating one of the three Indian men present.) Q. Who is this woman who sits here? A. She is the wife of Standing Bear. Q. The child is the grandson of Standing Bear and this woman? A. Yes, sir. Q. What is her name? A. Susette. Q. Is the father of that child living or dead? A. Dead. Q. And the other orphan that you speak of, what relation does it sustain to Standing Bear and Su sette? A' Grand-daughter. [Objected to by counsel for the government as im material, and not tending to show that these Indians have dissolved their tribal relations.] Mr. Webster Tell us who is that man sitting next to Standing Bear? A. Yellow Horse. Q. Do you know what relation he is to Standing Bear? STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 81 [Objected to by counsel for government as incom petent. Overruled.] A. They are brothers. Q. State what these Indians were engaged in after they arrived at the Omaha Agency? A. What little time they staid there they were en gaged in helping the Omahas put in their crops. Q. What crops were the Omahas putting in? A. Wheat. Q. State what one, if any, of the Indians, the Poncas, were putting in crops for themselves? A. Buffalo Chip was helping put in a crop for him self. His friends at the Omaha Agency gave him land enough to sow his wheat. Q. At the time of the arrest, state, if you know, about the amount of wheat Buffalo Chip had put in on this land which was set apart for him? A. I think there must have been four or five acres sowed. Q. You may state what the habits of the Omahas were at the Agency where these Indians were, as to labor and agriculture? A. They are all, or the greater part of them, on their farms. They have a great deal of land broken, and each one has his farm to himself. Q. State whether the land is allotted to the members of the tribe? A. It is. Q. State what day of the week it was when these Indians were arrested? A. It was on Sunday. Q. On that day, state whether they were resting from their labors? A. They were. 2 THE PONCA CHIEFS. Q. State whether.it is the habit of the Poncas to rest on the Sabbath day from their labor? The 'Court Is that necessary? Mr. Webster The theory of this government is to Christianize these Indians, I believe. The Witness It is about the same as it is with white men, some do, and some do not. Mr. Webster State how many of these Poncas, , during their stay at the Omaha Agency, were engaged in labor whether all were so engaged? A. All that were able, to were. Q. Those who were not employed in actual labor, state why they were not? [Objected to as immaterial by counsel for the gov ernment. Objection overruled.] Mr. Webster You may answer why the others were not engaged in labor. A. Because they were sick and unable to work. Q. How many of their number were sick when they arrived on the Agency and unable to work? A. There were hardly any of them able to work when they arrived on the Agency not more than one or two, so far as I could learn. Q. During their stay at the Agency, and prior to their arrest by Lieut. Carpenter, state to what extent they had improved in heal h so as to be able to commence labor? A. They had improved a good deal, but those who weie working were not really able to work. Q. At the time of their arrest by Lieut. Carpenter about how many had begun to labor? A. I think five or six out of the twelve. Q.. State whether any are engaged in labor now at the Fort? STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 83 [Objected to by counsel for government. Objection sustained.] CRO SS- EX AMINED. Dist.-Atfy Lambertson How many Indians came there? A. Thirty-five I think. I don't know the exact num ber. Ihe Court How many join in the petition twenty- seven? Mr. Lambertson I believe there are not quite that many. The children, I think, are not put in the peti tion. (To the witness.) At the time they were ar rested, five or six were engaged in agricultural pursuits? A. Yes, sir. Q. Were they squaws? A. No, sir. Q. Standing Bear was working, was hfi? A. Yes, sir. Q. Then there were five of the thirty-five that were working? A. Only that many in the field. The women were working around their tents. They are not supposed to go into the fields. Q. Who was their chief? A. Standing Bear is the head chief of the tribe. Buf falo Chip was the chief of these Indians here. Stand ing Bear has a tribe of about a hundred, I think; I do not know the exact number. Q. You don't know what some of them, or a good many of them did at the Indian Territory before they arrived at the Omaha Agency? A. I know that a good many of them died before be left with his tribe. 84 THE PONCA CHIEFS. Q. And the original number of his tribe was about a hundred? A. Yes, sir. Q. He was their acknowledged chief there at the Agency? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did they obey his orders? A. Yes, sir. Q. What other chiefs have they? A. There are several chiefs down at the lower Agency in the Indian Territory. I was not there. Q. Name some of the other chiefs that were ar rested. A. Standing Bear, Buffalo Chip, and Chicken Hunter. Q. These managed and controlled the Indians? A. Yes, sir. Each one controlled his own band. Q. They lived at the Omaha Agency as the friends of the Omaha Indians? A. Yes, sir; while they were there. Q. They followed the same pursuit the other Indians did? A. Yes, sir. Q. What did they live in tents? A. Yes, sir; they brought their tents, I think. Q. These tents were provided by the government? A. These tents were made by themselves. Q. These wagons were furnished by the govern ment? A. Yes, sir; they brought their wagons with them. Q. Did they have any citizens' clothes? A. They had. Q. These clothes were also provided by the govern ment? STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 85 A. Yes, sir; some were, and some wore not. Q. Some of them wore blankets? A. Some wore blankets, pants, and vests, and some wore Indian clothes throughout. Q. These blankets were they provided by the gov ernment? A. Some of them yes, sir. Q. You say Standing Bear had put in about five acres of wheat? A. No, sir; Buffalo Chip had. There was three or four acres put in for Standing Bear by the police of the Oinahas. Q. Then Standing Bear didn't put in any himself? A. He helped to put it in. Q. About how long were these Indians there before they were arrested? A. About two weeks. Q. Who arrested them Agent Vore? A. They were arrested by Lieut. Carpenter. Q. Hadn't they been arrested before by Agent Vore? A. No, sir. Q. Didn't they seem to .come there as guests of the Omahas? A- No, sir. Q. How did they come? A. They came as Indians, and said they wanted to go back to their old land, or find some place to work, and that if the Omahas would give them some land they would remain with them. Q. Do these Omahas speak the English language? A. A very few of them. Q. None of these Indians here can speak English? A. No, sir. 86 THE PONCA CHIEFS. Q. About how much cultivated land is there at the Agency? A. I couldn't tell. Q. Do you have any idea of the amount? A. I suppose they have in about 1,500 acres of wheat. Q. How many Omaha Indians are there? A. 1083, I believe, at the last count. Q. That would be about an acre and a half to the Indian? A. Of wheat ground yes, sir. They have corn ground as much as that, or more, too. Q. That would make about three acres to the Indian? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do they cultivate this land? A. Yes, sir. Q. How do the Omahas live? A. They live very well. Q. Does the government furnish them anything? A. Nothing but farm implements. Q. The government has an agent there? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is there not from time to time annuities paid them by the government? A. There has been none paid for going on three years now. Q. Does the government furnish them any clothes? A. No, sir, all the annuities they have is in money. Q. Have these Indians received any better clothes since they came to Fort Omaha, or are the clothes they have on now the same they had when arrested? A. Some they had, and some were given them. Q. Who furnished them? STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. A. I don't know. Several persons who came there gave them things. Q. They didn't have as good clothes as these when they came to Omaha Agency, did they? A. No, sir, hardly so good. Q. Are all the Indians at the barracks dressed as well as these? A. No, sir. Q. These are the better dressed ones and the better looking ones? A, Yes, sir ; for that matter they all look alike. RE-DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. WEBSTER. Q. During the stay of these Poncas at the Agency, were tliey receiving any annuities from the govern ment? A. No, sir, not that I know of. At one time, a day or two before they were taken away by Lieut. Carpen ter, they received some rations from the agent at the Omaha Agency. Q. State what objections the Omahas had, if any, to the Poncas remaining upon these lands at the Omaha reservation? A. They had no objection at all. I know from what the Omahas told me. [Objected to by counsel for the government, ss in competent and immaterial. Overruled.] Mr. Webster You may sta'te the facts. A . They said they wanted the Poncas to come back there and live with, them; they had more land than they needed, and they could sell them part of their land and they could join together and live as one tribe 88 THE PONCA CHIEFS. of Indians. They were willing to have them come and take part of their land, and try to become citizens, as they were trying. The Court Were the Poncas ever any part of the Omaha tribe? Mr. Webster No, sir, they have simply inter-married to some extent. RE-CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. LAMBERTSON. Q. State whether these Indians submitted themselves to the authority of the Omaha Indians, or the Omaha chiefs? Were they governed in the same manner the Omahas were, and followed the same pursuits? A. Yes, sir. Q. And obeyed the Omaha chiefs? A. They took ad vice, of course, of the Omaha chiefs. Q. Were they governed by the same form as the Omaha Indians? A. Yes, sir. Q. They submitted themselves to the same rules, customs and habits as the Omahas? A. Yes, sir. Mr. Webster Do the Omahas have any chiefs? A. Tliey have no chiefs now. Q. Then there was no part of the Omahas command ing these Poncas? A. No, sir. Q. About all there was about that was that they simply advised together, and consulted as to what was best to be done? A. Yes, sir. Mr. Lambertson Is there any head man in the Omaha tribe? STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 89 A. No, sir, not now. There was some time ago, last summer but they put away all their chiefs and head men. Mr. Webster They live like white men, then? A. They try to. LIEUT. WILLIAM L. CARPENTER. Sworn on behalf of the relators, and examined in chief by Mr. Webster, testified as follows: Q. Do you have immediate charge of these Indians? A. I have. Q. State whether you are the officer who made the arrest at the Omaha Agency? A. I am. Q. Will you state the date of that arrest? A. It was on Sunday, in the latter part of March, the last week in March. I would have to look at a cal endar. Q. State whether prior to that time you had been acquainted personally with these Poncas? A. I had never seen them at all before. Q. At the time they were arrested by you, state in what manner they were dressed whether they were wearing citizens' clothes or not? A. The majority of the men were dressed in citi zens' clothes. Only two, I think, wore blankets and leggings. Q. State what you know of these Indians having been engaged in labor and agriculture at the Omaha Agency at the time of, and prior to their arrest. A. I don't know anything on that subject from my own knowledge nothing but what I have heard. 90 THE PONCA CHIEFS. Q. Did you, by conversation or otherwise, acquire any knowledge as to what their habits had been at the Omaha Agency? [Objected to by counsel for the government as in competent, immaterial and irrelevant. Sustained.] Mr. Webster After you had brought these Indians to Fort Omaha, you may state what kind of dress they continued to wear from the day of their arrest by you, up to the present time? A. Some of them wore the same clothing they are wearing now. Q. State what these Indians have been doing while under your charge, as to laboring, and their desire to labor. A. About ten days ago two of the Indians stated they were willing to work. They had been sick for some time. [Objected to as immaterial by counsel for the gov ernment. Sustained.] Mr. Webster State from your observation of these Indians, and the labor which they have performed, what skill and knowledge they have as laborers? [Objected to and sustained.] CROSS-EXAMINED ME. LAMBEETSON. Q. How many chiefs are there. [Objected to by counsel for relators as improper cross-examination. Sustained.] Mr. Lambertson Slate the names of the parties arrested? [Objected to by counsel for the relators as immaterial, and on the ground that the returns show that.] The CtouriVTby is that material? STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 91 Mr. Lambertson To show that these Indians have their chiefs, to whom they profess allegiance. The Court You will have to make the witness your own to do that. STANDING BEAR, One of the relators, sworn on the part of the relators, and examined in chief by Mr. Webster, through the witness Hamilton, who was sworn as interpreter, testi fied as follows: Mr. Lambertson Does this court think an Indian is a competent witness? The Court They are competent for every purpose in both civil and criminal courts. The law makes no dis tinction on account of race, color, or previous condition. Mr. Webster (to the interpreter) Ask him to state when it was they left their reservation to go to the Indian Territory? A. He says it is about two years since they left. Q. Ask him to state the manner in which they lived on their old reservation, what labor they performed, and what success they had? A. He says, we lived well ; I had my land, and raised enough so I could get along nicely. Mj children were going to school, we had a good school, and everything going nicely. Q. Ask him whether his people were working when they lived up there? A. He says they were all working hard. Q. Ask him what they were doing up there to be come like white men? The Court What sort of white men? You had bet ter limit that a little. Mr. Webster Well, civilized. 92 THE PONCA CHIEFS. A. He says the white men are great workers, some of them, and some are not. He says it is about the same way w;th the Indians some want to work, and some don't. He says he wants to work, and become like a white man, and that he has tried his best. Q. Ask him when they left their reservation where they went to first, whether to the Omaha reservation? A. He says no, they didn't go there; they went south to the Indian Territory. Q. Ask him how they came to go down there. Have him tell the story as to how they came to go down there? [Objected to by counsel for government on the ground the inquiry here is solely as to whether these Poncas have dissolved their tribal relations. The question was withdrawn.] Mr. Webster Ask him how he and his people lived in the Indian Territory after they got down there, what they had, whether they worked, and what kind of clothes they wore? Ask himjfurther, what they did still after they arrived thore to become like civilized white men, and then let him tell the story. Mr. Lambertson I want questions put to him, and let him answer the questions. A. He says, when I got down there, I saw the land, and the land was not good to my eye ; some places it looked e:ood, but you kick up the soil a little, and you found lots of stones. It was not fit to farm. When we got down there we heard we were going to get cloth ing, and get money, and everything that we wanted, but I have not seen it yet. When I was told to go down there, I thought, perhaps, the land was good, and I could make a living, but when I got down there STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 93 it was entirely different from the land in my own home. I could'nt plow, I couldn't sow any wheat, and we all got sick, and couldn't do anything, it seemed as though I had no strength in my body at all. The hot climate didn't agree with me. But when I came back here I seemed to get strength every day. Instead of our tribe becoming prosperous, they died off every day during the time. From the time I went down there until I left, one hundred and fifty-eight of us died. I thought to myself, God wants me to live, and I think if I come back to my old reservation he will let me live. I got back as far as the Omahas, and they brought me down here. I see you all here to-day. What have I done? I am brought here, but what have I done? I don't know. It seems as though I haven't a place in the world, no place to go, and no home to go to, but when I see your faces here, I think some of you are trying to help me, so that I can get a place sometime to live in, and when it comes my time to die, to die peacefully and happy. (This was spoken in a loud voice, and with much emphasis.) The Court Tell the witness to keep cool. Mr. Webster Have him state what they did by way of farming and labor while they were down in the Indian Territory. A. He says they couldn't farm, all the work they did was to haul wood sometimes to the agent, and work around the Agency, what work they could do. Q. Ask him if they were all ready and willing to work if they had had any work to do? A. He says yes, if there had been any work to do. They would have all worked if there had been any farming; they all farmed on their own reservation , they 94 THE PONCA CHIEFS. all had farms, and all had work to do. Down there, there was no land to farm, and they all got sick, and were not able to work. Q. Ask him if they had any schools down there, or anything by way of educating the children? A. He says they had no schools there. Q. Ask him how many there were in his band of Poncas at the time he left the Indian Territory? A. He says about fifty. Q. Ask him how many came away with him when he came to the Omaha reservation? A. He says thirty. Q. Ask him whether the others are still in tne In dian Territory? A. He says he thinks some may be on the road back. He heard some were on the road up here. Q. Ask him how many chiefs of the tribe are down there with the others in the Indian Territory? A. He says seven. Q. Ask him why he and the others left the tribe in Indian Territory and came to the Omaha reservation? A. He says it was hard for him to stay there, and ho thought perhaps if he could come up here he could save his wife and child, the only child he has living, and that is why he came up to save them, and to get a living for them some place else, if he could. Q. Ask him how many of his children died in the Indian Territory before he came away? A. He says two died down there. He says his son could talk English and write, and was a great help to him when he was on White Creek, and whenever he thinks of it, it makes him feel very bad. Q. Ask him what he and those who came with him STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 95 meant to do when they came north how they meant to enrn a living? [Objected to by counsel for the government as imma terial. Overruled.] A. He says he thought it was necessary to earn a living by work, and that is what he wanted to do, and that he thought if he came north he could get his laud back and go to work and earn his living in that way. Q. Ask him when they left the tribe whether they intended to stay away from the tribe? A. He says when he left, they asked if he was ever coming back, and he told them if he ever came back it wouid not beto stay; that lie wanted to go to a place where they could all work and earn their own living. Q. Ask him what he intended to do by way of be coming like civilized white men? A. He says in his travels he has seen a great many white people, .and he finds them all working wherever he goes farming, building houses, and that they have cattle and everything they want; all they want to eat, and he thinks if he has a chance he can do just the same, and that is the way he thought he would do. The Court That is the reason he left? A. Yes, sir. Mr. Webster Ask him whether the others that came awny with him intended to do what he did? [Objected to by counsel for the government as in competent.] The Court He may state if he knows. . A. He says they all wanted to do the same to work and earn a living. Q. Ask him, if he was released from his imprison- 96 THE PONCA CHIEFS. merit, whether he intends to go back to the tribe, or What he intends to do? [Objected to by counsel for the government. Ques tion withdrawn.] Q. Ask him whether they all intended to put in crops on these lands of the Omahas? A- He says that was the intention of all. Q. Ask him whether, after the time they left the Indian Territory, he intended to continue to exercise his powers as chief, or whether they simply acted together as friends? [Objected to by counsel for the government as leading. Overruled.] A. He says he didn't consider himself a chief ; he didn't consider himself as their head man, but looked upon himself and the rest as being alike. Q. Ask him whether, when they advised with him, it was simply in a social way, because of his haying been a chief, or whether they recognized any authority in him. A. He says he felt himself to be as poor as the rest of them. Q. That is after they left the tribe? A. Yes, sir. Q. Ask him to state whether he sent his own chil dren to school? [Objected to as immaterial. Sustained.] CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ME. LAMBEKTSON. Q. Ask him what was the number of people in the band of which he was chief in the Indian Territory. A. He says about fifty. STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 97 Q. Ask him how many of his particular band he left in the Indian Territory? A. He says only three of his band he brought with him. The rest of his band are there yet. He brought Yellow-Horse, Long-Runner, and Chicken Hunter, these men and their families. Q. About how many families of his band did he leave in the Indian Territory! A. He says about forty people. Q. Ask him how many families? A. He says about thirty families; there are about twenty that are married. There are few children; the children are dead. Q. Ask him if any members of any other band ex cept his own came with him? A. He says there was. Q. Ask him how many? A. He says there was one chief of some other band. He says this other chief had six men with him. Of course he has his family and some of his band. Q. Ask him how many compose his band, when he is in the Indian Territory? A. He says about fifty-six. That was his band when he went to the Indian Territory. Q. And there were fifty when he left? A. Yes, sir. Q. Ask him how many of the band of which he was chief died during the time he was in the Indian Terri- tory? [Objected to a? immaterial.} Mr. Lambertson Ask him how many of his own band came with him, that is including his own fam ily. Assuming that he had fifty in his band in the THE PONCA CHIEFS. Indian Territory, how many of that fifty came with, him? A. He says, taking the men, women, and children, that came with him, there were twenty. He says, counting his {amity, and all that came with him out of his band. Q. Ask him if he was chief or head man over these Indians now here and those in the Indian Territory? A. He sa3 r s, I was not the head man; I don't consider myself any better than they are. Q. Was that after he got out of the Indian Territory? A. Yes, sir; after we left the Indian Territory. Q. Ask him who came with him from the reservation, in Dakota to the Indian Territory. [Objected to as improper cross-examination by coun sel for the relators. Sustained.] Mr. Lambertson Ask him when he went to the In dian Territory the first time? A. He says the time he went down there was the year before they planted corn , it was the year before they were taken down the second time. Q. Ask him if he remained there until the other Indians came down? [Objected to by counsel for the relators as im proper cross-examination. Overruled.] A. He says no, he did not stay there. He says ho was left down there without an interpreter, to make his way back the best he could, because he would not pick out a piece of land there that he liked. Q. How long was he left there before the other In dians came down? A. He says it was in the spring they were taken down from their reservation. He says he would like STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 99 to tell the whole thing over from the time he was taken down first until they were all taken down. Mr. Lambertson (to Mr. Webster) Are you willing he should? Mr. Webster No. Mr. Lambertson (to the witness) Ask him if while they were in the Indian Territory the government pro vided them with wagons and farming implements? [Objected to by counsel for the relators as im proper cross-examination and as immaterial. Over ruled.] A. He says they got some wagons and some mowing machines. Q. Ask him if they took their wagons with them when they left the Agency in the Indian Territory? A. He says they came in wagons. Q. Ask him if the wagons which the} 7 " came in from the Indian Territory to the Omaha Agency were the same wagons that were furnished by the government? A. He says two of the wagons they have were given to them on their former reservation, and the other is one he bought himself a light spring wagon. Mr. Webster^- Does he mean the Ponca reservation? A. Yes, sir, up above. Mr. Lambertson Ask him if when he left the In dian Territory the other members of the tribe were willing to remain? [Objected to by counsel for the relators as imma- . terial and irrelevant. Sustained.] Mr. Lambertson Ask him if, when he left the In dian Territory, he informed the agent that he was going away to live for himself and take care of himself? A. He says he told the agent several times he 100 THE PONCA CHIEFS. wanted to go, and asked him to help us get away to our own lands. He says he told him he was comiug away to try and save the rest of his family and find some place where he could work and make a living. Q. Ask him when he left the Indian Territory, whether he intended to go back to their former reserva tion in Dakota Territory, or did they intend to go to tho Omaha reservation? A. He says he wanted to go on his own land, that had always been his own land; that he never sold it, and that is where he wanted to go to; that his son when he died made him promise if ever he went back there that he would take his bones there and bury him, and that he has got his bones in a box, and that if ever he goes there he will bury his bones there; that there is where he wants to live the rest of his life, and that there is where he wants to be buried. Q- Ask him if he wants to live in the same manner in which he lived when in the Dakota reservation? A. He says he might go there and worli until he was blind, but that would not change his color; that he would be an Indian in color, but he wants to go and work and become a citizen. Q. Ask him if he wants to live as the Omaha Indians live on the Omaha reservation? [Objected to by counsel for the relators as being too indefinite. Sustained.] Mr. Lambertson What I desire to ask him is, at tho time he came away, if he intended to continue in the same pursuits as when he was arrested, to adopt the same habits and customs as the Omaha Indians. [Objected to same as before.] The Court He may answer. STANDING BEAR'S APPEAL. 1Q1 A. He says that before he was brought down hero he didn't know hardly what to do whether to remain with the Omahas, or to go up to his old reservation ; tha^; the Omahas wanted him to stay there. They said they hed better all stay there and farm this summer, and then go up this fall ; that if they went up there now they would have a hard time to get along, and if they staid there this summer they would heip them so they could have a good start after they got to their old res ervation. Q. Ask him whether during the time he was at the Omaha reservation the government issued him and his band rations or provisions? A. He says the agent issued rations to his band once. He don't know whether they were issued from the gov ernment or were bought. It was issued only once. (The interpreter adds that he was the person who weighed out the rations the time referred to.) With this the testimony closed , the relators resting their case at this point, and no testimony whatever being introduced on behalf of the government. 102 THE PONCA CHIEFS. CHAPTER IX. WHAT THE ATTORNEYS HAD TO SAT TO THE COURT. At the conclusion of the testimony of Stand ing Bear, the government having no evidence to offer, the argument for the Indians was opened by Hon. J. L. Webster. He first on- quired, after a brief recital of the wrongs and cruelties which had so long been practised upon the Indians, how the government of the United States got titles to land, and said titles come in three ways first by discovery; second by conquest; third by purchase. He maintained that the government could not claim title to this land by discovery. The landing of white men upon the eastern shore of this continent could not give a title to the little piece of land on which the Poncas then resided at the mouth of the Niobrara river. A title by discovery did not give a fee simple to the soil, if it was occupied, but only political control. SUMMING UP. 103 The government of the United States could never acquire a title by conquest, for it had never been at war with the Ponca tribe. These two peoples had always been on the most friendly terms. The government had never purchased the land, and, therefore, the title to it still remained in the Poncas. Mr. Web ster then discussed the questions relating to Indian tribes as separate nations, the effect of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution, citizenship of Indians, the use of the army in their control, and made a thorough and able review of the whole prob lem, claiming that there was no law for the re moval of the Poncas to the Indian Territory, or for keeping them there by force, or for re turning those who had escaped, and asked the absolute discharge of Standing Bear and his party. Mr. Webster, who occupied about six hours in the delivery of his argument, was followed by the Government Attorney, Hon. G. M. Lam- bertson, who opened his argument with a very high commendation of the course of Messrs. Poppleton and Webster in volunteering their services, without the hope of reward, in defence of those helpless Indians. He claimed that Standing Bear was not entitled to the protec- 104 THE PONCA CHIEFS. tion of the writ of habeas corpus, not being a person or citizen under the law. His argument occupied about five hours, and was very ingen ious and eloquent. lion. A. J. Poppleton followed in a very powerful argument. He traced the history of the writ of habeas corpus from its origin, and claimed that it applied to every human being. He appealed on the behalf of these Indians as men, and showed that the position taken by the government counsel undermined the very foundations of human liberty. His argument consumed about four hours. Judge Dundy then allowed Standing Bear to address the court on his own behalf. The court room was at this time filled with leading citizens of the State, prominent officers of the army and their wives. Standing Bear's speech made a profound impression on all who heard it. He claimed that, although his skin was of a different hu, yet he was a man, and that God made him. He said he was not a savage, and related how he had saved the life of a soldier whom he had found on the plains, starved, and almost frozen to death, and of a man who had lost his way on the trackless "prairie, whom he had fed and guided to his destination. In spite of the orders of the SUMMING UP. 105 court and the efforts of the bailiffs, he was greeted with continual rounds of applause. At the conclusion of his speech, court adjourned, and the judge took several days to consider the matter. 106 THE PONCA CHIEFS. CHAPTER X. STANDING BEAR RELEASED DECISION OF JUDGE ELMER S. DTJNDY. "United States ex rel. Standing Bear, vs. George Crook, a Brigadier-General of the Army of the U. S. Before Elmer S. Dundy, U. S. District Judge for Nebraska. Habeas corpus. "An Indian is a person within the meaning of the habeas corpus act, and as such is entitled to sue out a writ of habeas corpus in the federal courts, when it is shown that the petitioner is deprived of liberty undercolor of authority of the United States, or is in custody of an officer in violation of the constitution, or a law of the United States, or in violation of a treaty made in pursuance thereof. "The right of expatriation is a natural, inherent, and inalienable right, and extends to the Indian as well as to the more fortunate white race. "The Commissioner of Indian Affairs has ample au thority for removing from an Indian reservation all persons found thereon without authority of law, or whose presence may be detrimental to the peace and welfare of the Indians. "The military power of the government may be em ployed to effect sucTi removal. But when the removal STANDING BEAR RELEASED. 1Q7 is effected, it is the duty of the troops to convey the persons so removed by the most convenient and safe route, to the civil authorities of the judicial district in which the offence may be committed, to be proceeded agains^in due course of law. "In time of peace no authority, civil or military, ex ists for transporting Indians from one section of the country to another, without the consent of the Indians, nor to confine them to any particular reservation against their will, and where officers of the govern ment attempt to do this, and arrest and hold Indians who are at peace with the government, for the pur pose of removing them to, and confining them on, a reservation in the Indian Territory, they will be released on habeas corpus. A. J. POPPLETON and JNO. L. WEBSTER, For the Relators. G. M. LAMBERTSON, U. S. Atty. For the Government. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. "DUNDY, JUDGE. "During the fifteen years in which I have been en gaged in administering the laws of my country, I have never been called upon to hear or decide a case that appealed so strongly to my sympathy as the one now under consideration. On the one side we have a few of the remnants of a .once numerous and powerful, but now weak, insignificant, unlettered and generally despised race. On the other, we have the representa tive of one of the most powerful, most enlightened, 108 THE PONCA CHIEFS. and most christianized nations of modern times. On the one side we have the representatives of this wasted race coming into this national tribunal of ours asking for justice and liberty to enable them to adopt our boasted civilization and to pursue the arts of peace, which have made us great and happy as a na tion. On the other side we have this magnificent, if not magnanimous, government, resisting this applica tion with the determination of sending these people back to the country which is to them less desirable than perpetual imprisonment in their own native land. But I think it is creditable to the heart and mind of the brave and distinguished officer who is made respond ent herein, to say that he has no sort of sympathy in the business in which he is forced by his position to bear a part so conspicuous. And so far as I am indi vidually concerned, I think it not improper to say that if the strongest possible sympathy could give the relators title to freedom, they would have been restored to liberty the moment the arguments in their behalf were closed. No examination of further thought would then have been necessary or expedient. But in a country where liberty is regulated by law, some thing more satisfactory and enduring than mere sym pathy must furnish and constitute the rule and basis of judicial action. It follows that this case must be examined and decided on principles of law, and that unless the relators are entitled to their discharge under the constitution or laws of the United States, or some treaty made in pursuance thereto, they must be remand ed to the custody of the officer who caused their arrest, to be returned to the Indian Territory, which they left without the consent of the government. STANDING BEAR RELEASED. 109 " On the 8th of April, 1879, the relators, Standing Bear and twenty-five others, during the session of the court held at that time at Lincoln, presented their pe tition, duly verified, praying for the allowance of a writ of habeas corpus, and their final discharge from custody thereunder. " The petition alleges in substance that the relators are Indians who have formerly belonged to thePonca tribe of Indians, now located in the Indian Territory; that they had some time previously withdrawn from the tribe and completely severed their tribal relations therewith, and had adopted the general habits of the whites, and were then endeavoring to maintain them selves by their own exertions, and without aid or as sistance from the general government ; that whilst they were thus engaged, and without being guilty of violat ing any of the laws of the United States, they were ar rested and restrained of their liberty, by order of the respondent, George Crook. "The writ was issued and served on the respondent on the 8th day of April, and the distance between the place where the writ was made returnable and the place where the relators were confined being more than twenty miles, ten days were allotted in which to make return. "On the 18th of April the writ was returned, and the authority for the arrest and detention is therein shown. The substance of the return to the writ, and the addi tional statement since filed, is that the relators are in dividual members of, and connected with the Ponca tribe of Indians; that they had fled or escaped from a reservation situated some place within the limits of the Indian Territory; had departed therefrom without per- HO THE PONCA CHIEFS. mission from the government, and at the request of the Secretary of the Interior the General of the army had issued an order which required the respondent to ar- restftmd return the rclators to their tribe in the Indian Territory, and that pursuant to the said order, he had caused the relators to be arrested on the Omaha Indian reservation, and that they were in his custody for the purpose of being returned to the Indian Territory. " It is claimed upon the one side, and denied upon the other, that the relators had withdrawn, and severed for all time, their connection with the tribe to which they belonged. And upon this point alone was there any testimony produced by either party hereto. The other matters stated in the petition, and the return to the writ, are conceded to be true, so that the questions to be determined are purely questions of law. "On the 8th of March, 1859, a treaty was made by the United States with the Ponca tribe of Indians, by which a certain tract of country north of the Niobrara river, and west of the Missouri was set apart for the perma nent home of the said Indians, in which the govern ment agreed to protect them during their good behav ior. But just when, or how, or why, or under what circumstances the Indians left their reservation in Da kota and went to the Indian Territory does not appear. JUEISDICTIOX OF COURT. " The district attorney very earnestly questions the jurisdiction of the court to issue the writ and to hear and determine the case made herein; and has supported his theory with an argument of great ingenuity and much ability. But nevertheless, I am of the opinion STANDING BEAR RELEASED. that his premises were erroneous, and his conclusions therefore wrong and unjust. The great respect I en tertain for that officer, and the very able manner in which his'views were presented, make it necessary for me to give somewhat at length the reasons which lead me to this conclusion. " The district attorney discussed at length the reas ons which led to the origin of the writ of habeas corpus, and the character of, and proceedings and practice in connection therewith in tie parent country. It was claimed that the laws of the realm limited the right to sue out this writ to the free subjects of the kingdom and that none others came within the benefit of such beneficent laws. And reasoning from analogy, it is claimed that none but American citizens are entitled to sue out this high prerogative writ in any of the federal courts. I have not examined the English laws regu lating the suing out of the writ, nor have I ihought it necessary so to do. Of this I will only observe tfcat if the laws of England are as they are claimed to be, they will appear at a disadvantage when compared with our own. This only proves that the laws of a limited mon archy are sometimes less wise and humane than the laws of our own good republic that whilst the Parlia ment of Great Britain was legislating in behalf of the favored few, the Congress of the United States was legislating in behalf of all mankind who come within our jurisdiction. " Section 751 of the ' Revised Statutes' declares that ' the supreme court and the circuit and district courts shall have power to issue writs of habeas corpus.' Section 752 confers the power to issue writs on tho judges of said courts within their jurisdiction, and de- 112 THE PONCA CHIEFS. clares this to be ' for the purpose of inquiry into the cause of restraint of liberty.' Section 753 restricts the power, limits the jurisdiction, and defines the cases where the writ may properly issue. That inky be done under this section where the prisoner ' is in custody under or by color of authority of the United States, * * * or is in custody for an act done or omitted in pursuance of a law of the United States, * * * or in custody in violation of the constitution or of a law or treaty of the United States.' Thus it will be seen that when a person is in custody or deprived of his liberty, under color of authority of the United States, or in violation of the constitution or laws or treaties of the United States, the federal judges have j urisdiction, and the writ can properly issue. I take it that the true construction to be placed upon this act is this: That in all cases where federal officers, civil or military, have the custody and control of a person, claimed to be unlawfully restrained of liberty, that they are then restrained of liberty under color of authority of the United States, the federal courts can properly proceed to determine the question of unlawful restraint because no other courts can properly do so. In the other in stance, the federal courts and judges can properly is sue the writ in all cases where the person is alleged to be in custody in violation of the constitution or a law or treaty of the United States. In such a case it is wholly immaterial what officer, state or federal, has custody of the person seeking the relief. These re- lators may be entitled to the writ in either case. Under the first paragraph they certainly are, that is, if an Indian can be entitled to it at all, because they are in custody of a federal officer under color of authority of STANDING BEAR RELEASED. H3 the United States, and they may be entitled to the writ under the other paragraph before recited, for the reason, as they allege, tha,t they are restrained of liberty in vio lation of a provision of their treaty before referred to. Now, it must be borne in mind that the habeas corpus act describes applicants for the writ as 'persons' or 'parties,' who may be entitled thereto. It nowhere describes them as citizens, nor is citizenship in any way or place made a qualification for sueing out the writ, and in the absence of express provision or necesary implication, which would require the interpretation contended for by the district attorney, I should not feel justified in giving the words person and party such" a narrow construction. The most natural, and there fore most reasonable way, is to attach the same mean ing to -words and phrases when found in a statute that is attached to them when and where found in general use. If we do so in this instance, then the question cannot be open to serious doubt. Webster describes a person as 'a living soul: a self conscious being; a moral agent; especially a living human being; a man, woman or child; an individual of the human race.' This is comprehensive enough, it would seem, to include even an 'Indian. In describing and defining generic terms, the first section of the revised statutes declares that the word person includes co-part nerships and corporations. On the whole it seems to me quite evident that the comprehensive language used in this section is intended to apply to all mankind, ns well tlie relators a? the more favored white race. This will be doing no violence to language, nor to the spirit or letter of the law, nor to the intention, as it is believed, of the law-making power of the government. 114 THE PONCA CHIEFS. "I must liold, then, that Indians, and consequently the relators, are persons, such as are described by and included within the laws before quoted. It is said, however, that this is the first instance on record in which an Indian has beeji permitted to sue out and maintain a writ of habeas corpus in a federal court, and therefore, the court must be without jurisdiction in the premises. This is a non sequitur. I confess I do not know of another instance where this has been done, but I can also say that the occasion for it perhaps has never before been so great. It may be that the Indians think it wiser and better in the end to resort to this peaceful process than it would be to undertake the hopeless task of redressing their own alleged wrongs by force of arms. Returning reason, and the sad experience of others similarly situated, has taught them the folly and madness of the arbitrament of the sword. They can readily see that any serious resistance on their part would be the signal for their utter extermination. Have they not then chosen the wiser part, by resort ing to the very tribunal erected by those they claim have wronged and oppressed them? This, however, is not the tribunal of their own choice, but it is the only one into which they can lawfully go for deliverance. It cannot there fore be fairly said that because no Indian ever before invoked the aid of this writ in a federal court, that the rightful authority to issue it does not exist. Power and authority rightfully conferred does not necessarily cease to exist in consequence of long non-nser. Though much time has elapsed, and many generations have passed away since the passage of the original habeas corpus act from which I have quoted, it will not do to say that these Indians cannot avail themselves of its STANDING BEAR RELEASED. H5 beneficent provisions simply because none of their ancestors ever sought relief thereunder. " Every person who comes within our jurisdiction, whether he be European, Asiatic, African, or 'native to the manor born,' must obey the laws of the United States. Every one who violates them incurs the penalty provided thereby. When a person is charged, in a proper way, with the commission of crime, we do not inquire upon the trial in what country the accused was born, nor to what sovereign or government alle giance is due, nor to what race he belongs. The ques tions of guilt and innocence only form the subjects of inquiry. An Indian then, especially off from his res-* eryation, is amenable to the criminal laws of the United States the same as all other persons. They being sub ject to arrest for the violation of our criminal laws and being Arsons such as the law contemplates and in cludes in the description of parties who may sue out the writ, it would, indeed, be a sad commentary on the justice and impartiality of our laws, to hold that In dians, though natives of our own country, cannot test the validity of an alleged illegal imprisonment in this manner, as well as a subject of a foreign government who may happen to be sojourning in this country but owing it no sort of allegiance. I cannot doubt that Congress intended to give to every person who might be unlawfully restrained of liberty undercolor of authority of the United States the right to the writ and a discharge thereon. I conclude then, that so far as the issuing of the writ is concerned, it was properly issued, and that the relators are within the jurisdiction conferred by the habeas corpus act. " A question of much greater importance remains for 116 THE PONCA CHIEFS. consideration, which, when determined, will be decisive of this whole controversy. This relates to the right of the government to arrest and Hold the relators for a time for the purpose of being returned to a point in the In dian Territory, from which it is alleged the Indians es caped. I am not vain enough to think that I can do full justice to a question like the one under consideration. But as the matter furnishes so much valuable material for discussion, and so much food for reflection, I shall try to present it as viewed from my own stand-point, without reference to consequences or criticisms which, though not specially invited, will be sure to follow. " A review of the policy of the government adopted in its dealing with the friendly tribe of Poncas, to which thejelators at one time belonged, seems not only appropriate, but almost indispensable to a correct understanding of this controversy. The Ponca In dians have been at peace with the government, and Lave remained the steadfast friends of the whites for many years. They lived peaceably upon the land and in the country they claimed arid called their own. " On the 12th of March, 1858, they made a treaty with the United States by which they cedecl all claims to lands except the following tract: 'Beginning at a point on the NiObrara river and running due north so as to intersect the Ponca river twenty five miles from its mouth, thence from said point of intersection up and along tbe Ponca river twenty miles, thence due south to the Niobrara river, and thence down and along said river to the place of beginning, which tract is hereby reserved for the future homes of said Indians.' In consideration of this cession the government agreed ' to protect the Poncas in the possession of the tract of land STANDING BEAR RELEASED. H7 reserved for their future homes, and their persons and property thereon, during good behavior on their part.' Annuities were to be paid them for thirty years, houses were to be built, and schools were to be established, and other things were to be done by the government in consideration of said cession. (See page 997, 12, Stat. at large.) On the 10th of March, 1865, another treaty was made, and a part of the other reservation was ceded to the government. Other lands, however, were, to some extent, substituted therefor, and ' by way of rewarding them for their constant fidelity to the gov ernment and citizens thereof, and with a view of re turning to the said tribe of Ponca Indians their old burying grounds and corn fields.' This treaty also provides for paying $15,080 for spoliations committed on the Indians. " (See page 675, 14 vol., Stat. at large.) " On the 29th day of April, 1868, the government made a treaty with the several bands of Sioux Indians, which treaty was ratified by the Senate on the 16th of the fol lowing February, in and by which the reservations set apart for the Poncas under the former treaties were completely absolved. (15 Statutes at large, page 635.) This was done without consultation with, or knowledge or consent on the part of, the Ponca tribe of Indians. " On the 15th of August, 1876, Congress passed the general Indian approproation bill, and in it we find a provision authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to use $25,000 for the removal of the Poncas to the In dian Territory, and providing them a home therein, with consent of the tribe. (See page 192, 19 vol., Statues at large.) "In the Indian appropriation bill passed by Congress 118 THE PONCA CHIEFS. on the 27th day of May, 1878, we find a provision au thorizing the Secretary of the Interior to expend the sum of $30,000 for the purpose of removing and locat ing the Ponca Indians on a new reservation near the Kaw river. "No reference has been made to any other treaties or laws, under which the right to arrest and remove tho Indians is claimed to exist. " The Poncas lived upon their reservation in Southern Dakota and cultivated a portion of the same until two or three years ago, when they removed therefrom, but whether by force or otherwise, does not appear. At all events, we find a portion of them, including the relators, located at some point in the Indian Territory. There, the testimony seems to show, is where the trouble commenced. Standing Bear, the principal wit ness, states that out of 710 Indians who went from the reservation in Dakota to the Indian Territory 158 died within a year or so, and a great proportion of the others were sick and disabled, caused in a great measure, no doubt, from change of climate, and to save himself and the survivors of his wasted family, and the feeble remnant of his little band of followers, he determined to leave the Indian Territory and return to his old home, where, to use his own language, ' he might live and die in peace, and be buried with his fathers.' He also states that he informed the agent of their final purpose to leave, never to return, and that he and his followers had finally, fully, and forever severed his and their connection with the Ponca tribe of Indians, and had resolved to disband as a tribe, or band, of Indians, and to cut loose from the government, go to work, become self-sustaining, and adopt the habits and customs of a STANDING BEAR RELEASED. H9 higher civilization. To accomplish what would seem to be a desirable and laudable purpose, all who were able so to do went to work to earn a living. The Omaha Indians, who speak the same language, and with whom many of the Poncas have long since con tinued to intermarry, gave them employment and ground to cultivate so as to make them self-sustaining. And it was when at the Omaha reservation, and when thus employed, that they were arrested by order of the government for the purpose of being taken back to the Indian Territory. They claim to be unable to see the justice, or reason, or wisdom, or necessity of removing them by force from their own native plains and blood relations to a far off country in which they can see little but new made graves opening for their reception. The land from which they fled in fear has no attractions for them. The love of home and native land was strong enough in the minds of these people to induce them to brave every peril to return and live and die where they had been reared. The bones of the dead son of Stand ing Bear were not to repose in the land they hoped to be leaving forever, but were carefully preserved and protected, and formed a part of what was to them a melancholy procession homeward. Such instances of parental affection, and such love of home and native land may be heathen in origin, but it seems to me that they are not unlike cliristian in principle. "What is here stated in this connection is mainly for the purpose of showing that the relators did all they could to separate themselves from their tribe, and to sever their tribal relations, for the purpose of be coming self-sustaining, and living without support from, the government. This being so, presents the 120 THE PONCA CHIEFS. question as to whether or not an Indian can withdraw from his tribe, sever his tribal relation therewith, and terminate his allegiance thereto, for the purpose of mak ing an independent living, and adopting our own civili zation. " If Indian tribes are to be regarded and treated as separate but dependent nations, there can be no serious difficulty about the question. If they are not to be regarded and treated as separate, dependent nations, then no allegiance is owing from an individual Indian to his tribe, and he could, therefore, withdraw there from at any time. The question of expatriation has engaged the attention of our government from the time of its very foundation. Many heated discussions have been carried on between our own and foreign governments on this great question, until diplomacy has triumphantly secured the right to every person found within our jurisdiction. This right has always been claimed and admitted by our government, and it is now no longer an open question. It can make but little difference then whether we accord to the Indian tribes a national character or not, as in either case I think the individual Indian possesses the clear and God-given right to withdraw from his tribe and for ever live away from it, as though it had no further existence. If the right of expatriation was open to doubt in this country down to the year 1868, certainly since that time no sort of question as to the right can now exist. On the 27th of July, of that year, Con gress passed an act, now appearing as sec. 1,999 of the revised statutes, which declares that: " ' Whereas, the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indisputable to the enjoy- STANDING BEAR RELEASED. ment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and, whereas, in the recognition of this principle the government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights of citizenship. * * * * Therefore any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision of any officer of the United States which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is declared incon sistent with the fundamental principles of the republic.' This declaration must forever settle the question until it is re-opened by other legislation upon the same sub ject. This is, however, only re-affirming in the most solemn and authoritative manner a principle well set tled and understood in this country for many years past. "In most, if not all, instances in which treaties have been made with the several Indian tribes, where re servations have been set apart for their occupancy, the government has either reserved the right or bound itself to protect the Indians thereon. Many of the treaties expressly prohibit white persons being on the reservations unless especially authorized by the treat ies or acts of Congress for the purpose of carrying out treaty stipulations. "Laws passed for the government of the Indian country, and for the purpose of regulating trade and intercourse with the Indian tribes, confer upon cer tain officers of the government almost unlimited power over the persons who go upon the reservations with out lawful authority. Sec. 2,149 of the revised statutes, authorizes and requires the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, with the approval of the Secretary of the In terior, to remove from any * tribal reservation' any person being thereon without authority of law, or 122 THE PONCA CHIEFS. whose presence \vitliin the limits of the reservation may, in the judgment of the Commissioner, be detri mental to the peace and welfare of the Indians; the au thority here conferred upon the Commissioner fully justifies him in causing to be removed from Indian reservations all persons thereon in violation of law, or whose presence thereon may be detrimental to the peace and welfare of the Indians upon the reserva tions. This applies as well to an Indian as to a white person, and manifestly for the same reason, the object of the law being to prevent unwarranted interference between the Indians and the agent representing the government. Whether such an extensive discretion ary power is wisely vested in the Commissioner of In dian Affairs or not, need not be questioned. It is enough to know that the power rightfully exists, and where existing, the exercise of the power must be up held. If, then, the Commissioner has the right to cause the expulsion from the Omaha Indian reserva tion of all persons thereon who are there in violation of law, or whose presence may be detrimental to the peace and welfare of the Indian, then he must of ne cessity be authorized to use the necessary force to accomplish his purpose. Where, then, is he to look for this necessary force? The military arm of the government is the most natural and most potent force to be used on such occasions, and sec. 2,150 of the re vised statutes especially authorizes the use of the army for this service. The army, then, it seems, is the proper force to employ when intruders and trespassers who go upon the reservations are to be ejected there from. " The first sub-division of the revised statutes last STANDING BEAK RELEASED. 123 referred to provides that 'the military forces of the United States may be employed in such manner, and under such regulations as the president may direct: " 'First In the apprehension of every person who may be in the Indian country in violation of law, and in conveying him immediately from the Indian coun try, by the nearest conveyance and safe route, to the civil authority of the Territory or judicial district in which such person shall be found, to be proceeded against in due course of law.' * * * This is the authority under which the military can be lawfully employed to remove intruders from an Indian reserva tion. What may be done by the troops in such cases is here fully and clearly stated, and it is this authority, it is believed, under which the respondent acted. "All Indian reservations held under treaty stipula tions with the government must be deemed, and taken to be part of the Indian country, within the meaning of our laws on that subject. The relators were found upon the Omaha Indian reservation, that being a part of the Indian country, and not being a part of the Omaha tribe of Indians, they were there without law ful authority, and if the Commissioner of Indian Affairs deemed their presence detrimental to the peace and welfare of the Omaha Indians, he had lawful warrant to remove them from the reservation, and to employ the necessary military force to effect this object in safety. General Crook had the rightful authority to remove the relators from the reservation, nnd mu c t stand justified in removing them therefrom. But when the troops are thus employed they must exercise the authority in the manner provided by the section of the law just read. This law makes it the duty of the 124 THE PONCA CHIEFS. troops to convey the parties arrested by the nearest convenient and safe route to the civil authority of the Territory or judicial district in which such person shall be found, to be proceeded against in due course of law. The duty of the military authorities is here very clearly and sharply defined, and no one can be justified in depart ing therefrom, especially in time of peace. As Gen eral Crook had the right to arrest and remove the re- lators from the Omaha Indian reservation, it follows from what has been stated that the law re quired him to convey them to this city, and turn them over to the marshal and United States attorney, to be proceeded against in due course of law. Then proceedings could be instituted against them in either the circuit or dis trict court, and if the relators had incurred a penalty under the law, punishment would follow. Otherwise they would be discharged from custody. But this course was not pursued in this case, neither was it in tended to observe the laws in that regard, for General Crook's orders, emanating from higher authority, ex pressly required him to apprehend the relators, and remove them by force to the Indian Territory, from which it is alleged they escaped. But in what General Crook has done in the premises no fault can be im puted to him. He was simply obeying the orders of his superior officers as a good soldier ought to do, but the orders, as we think, lack the necessary authority of law, and are, therefore, not binding on the relators. "I think I have shown pretty clearly the rightful authority vested in the Commissioner of Indian Affairs in cases like the one under consideration that he may call on the troops to assist in carrying out his lawful orders, and just how and for what purpose the author- STANDING BEAR RELEASED. 125 ity is vested in him to remove trespassers and intru ders from the Indian country. I have searched in vain for the semblance of any au thority justifying the Commissioner in attempting to remove by force any Indians, whether belonging to a tribe or not, to any place, or for any other purpose than what has been stated. Certainly, without some specific authority found in an act of Congress, or in a treaty with the Ponca tribe of Indians, he could not lawfully force the relators back to the Indian Territory to remain and die in that country against their will. In the absence of all treaty stipulations or laws of the United States authorizing such removal, I must con clude that no such arbitrary authority exists. It is true, if the relators are to be regarded as a part of the great nation of Ponca Indians, the government might, in time of war, remove them to any place of safety so long as the war should last, but perhaps no longer un less they were charged with the commission of some crime. This is a war power merely, and exists in time of war only. Every nation exercises the right to ar rest and detain an alien euQjny, during the existence of a war, and all subjects or citizens of the hostile nations are subject to be dealt with under this rule. But it is not claimed that the Ponca tribe of Indians are at war with the United States so that this war power might be used against them. In fact they are amongst the most peaceable and friendly of all the Indian tribes, and have at times received from the government unmistaka ble and substantial recognition of their long continued friendship for the whites. In time of peace the war power remains in abeyance, and must be subservient to the civil authority of the government until something 126 THE PONCA CHIEFS. occurs to justify its exercise. No fact exists, and noth ing has occurred, so far as the Delators are concerned, to make it necessary or lawful to exercise such an au- thorit3 r over them. If they could be removed to the Indian Territory by force, and kept there in the same wa} r , I can see no good reason why they might not be taken and kept by force in the penitentiaiy at Lincoln, or Leavenworth, or Jefferson City, or any other place which the commander of the forces might, in his judg ment, see proper to designate. I cannot think, and will not believe, that any such arbitrary authority ex ists in this country, and until the highest judicial tribunal in this land shall otherwise determine, I shall not be convinced that my conclusions are erroneous. "I have not thought it necessary to consider tho question of citizenship so ably presented on both sides, and therefore express no opinion thereon. " The reasoning advanced in support of my views, leads me to conclude : "First. That an Indian is a PERSON within the mean ing of the laws of the United States, and has therefore the right to sue out a writ of habeas corpus in a federal court or before a federal judge, in all cases where he may be confined, or in custody under color of authority of the United States, or where he is restrained of lib erty in violation of the constitution or laws of the Uni ted States. " Second. That General George Crook, the respondent, being the commander of the military department of the Platte, has the custody of the relators under color of authority of the United States, and in violation of the laws thereof. " Third. That no rightful authority exists for remov-. STANDING BEAR RELEASED. 127 ing by force any of the relators to the Indian Territory, as the respondent lias been directed'to do. " Fourth. That the Indians possess the inherent right of expatriation as well as the more fortunate white race, and have the inalienable right to ' life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,' so long as they obey the laws and do not trespass on forbidden ground. And "Fifth. Being restrained of liberty under color of authority of the United States, and in violation of the laws thereof, the relators must be discharged from cus tody, and it is so ordered." 128 THE PONCA CHIEFS. CHAPTER XL THE OEDEB OF EELEASE STANDING BEAE ? S FAEE- WELL ADDEESSES. A few days after the decision, Gen. Crook received an order from the Secretary of War ordering the discharge of Standing Bear and his companions. The day before he was to leave, the editor went out to bid him good-bye. The old chief said he had something to say that he did not wish anybody to hear. The editor, Standing Bear and the interpreter went out on a little hill to one side. There he spoke as follows : " When I was brought here a prisoner, my heart was broken. I was in despair. I had no friend in all the big world. Then you came. I told you the story of my wrongs. From that time until now you have not ceased to work for me. Sometimes, in the long days while I have been here a prisoner, I have come out here, and stood on this hill and looked towards the city. I thought there is one man there who is writing or speaking for me and my people. I remember the dark day when you first came to speak to me. I know if it STANDING BEAR'S ADDRESSES. 129 had not been for what you have done for me I would now be a prisoner in the Indian Territory, and many of these who are with me here would have been in their graves. It is only the kind treatment they have received from the soldiers, and the medicine which the army doctor has given them, which has saved their lives. I owe all this to you. I can never pay you for it. "I have traveled around a good deal. I have noticed that there are many changes in this world. You have a good house now to live in. A little while ago I had a house and land and stock. Now I have nothing. It may be that some time you may have trouble. You might lose your Louse. If you ever want a home come to me or my tribe. You shall never want as long as we have anything. All the tribe in the Indian Territory will soon know what you have done. While there is one Ponca alive you will never be without a friend. Mr. Poppleton and Mr. Webster are my friends. You are my brother." The old chief then led the way to his lodge, and opening a trunk, he took out a war-bonnet, a tomahawk, and a pair of beaded buckskin leggings. He said, "These leggings are for you, the tomahawk for Mr. Webster, and the war- bonnet for Mr. Poppleton. I wish you to take them and tell them I sent them to them." The editor suggested that he should go down to the city and present them himself, which he consented to do. The following is the ac- 130 THE PONCA CHIEFS. count of the presentation, published at the time in the daily papers: The decision of Judge Dundy, releasing Standing Bear and his band to civilization went into effect on Monday, May 19th, 1879, and they forthwith took their departure for the locality which they have selected on United States territory. On Sunday, the now liberated chief visited the city, and called at Hie residences of Hon. J. L. Webster, and Hon. A. J. Poppleton, to whose vindication in the courts he owes his enfran chisement, to express his gratitude by word and by deed. Out of the poverty of his wordly possessions he gave such visible token of his appreciation as he could, while out of the wealth of his human soul, and out of the fulness of his manly heart, he uttered sentiments and expressed purposes which distinguish him as a chief among ten thousand, and as a character dark though his skin may be, " altogether lovely." He first visited the residence of Mr. Webster, and to that gen tleman he presented his tomahawk, bearing his name. After shaking hands with all present, begin ning with the ladies, to whom he said he wished first to pay respect, he said, addressing Gen. Webster: STANDING BEAR TO WEBSTER. " You and I are here. Our skins are of a different color, but God made us both. A little while ago, when I was young, I was wild. I knew nothing of the ways of the white people. " I see you have nice houses here. 1 look at these beautiful rooms ; I would like to have a house too, and STANDING BEAR'S ADDRESSES. 131 it may be after a while that I can get one, but not so nice a house as this. That is what I want to do. " For a great many years a hundred years or more the white men have been driving us out. They :ire shrewd, sharp and know how to cheat; but since I have been here I have found them different. They have all treated me kindly. I am very thankful for it. "Hitherto, when we have been wronged we went to war to assert our rights and avenge our wrongs. We took the tomahawk. We had no law to punish those who did wrong; so we took our tomahawks and went to kill. If they had guns and could kill us first it was the fate of war. " But you have found a better way. You have gone into the court for us, and I find that our wrongs can be righted there. Now I have no more use for Hie toma hawk. 1 want to lay it down forever." Uttering these words with eloquent impressiveness, the old chief stooping down, placed the tomahawk on the floor at his feet then standing erect he folded his arms with native dignity and continued: "Hay it down; I have no more use for it; Iliave found a better way." Stooping again and taking up the weapon he placed it in Mr. Webster's hands and said: " I present it to you as a token of my gratitude. I want you to keep it in remembrance of this great vic tory which you have gained. 1 have no further use for it; 1 can now seek the ways of peace." " STANDING BEAK, I rejoice to know that you and 132 THE PONCA CHIEFS. those who are with you desire to become civilized, and like the white people of America. We know that for the last hundred years your tribe has always been the friend and protector of the white people. The ways of the whites may seem to you to be difficult, and hard to learn. Our ancestors were born white, while yours were born red; but a thousand years ago, when they inhabited the central and northern portions of Europe, they followed the same manner of life that you have led. We have progressed slowly from that time until we are now as you see us. I think it is the duty of the government and all the people to aid the friendly and peaceful Indians in every way possible to acquire the arts of civilization. "When the whites landed on these shores, they found heve at least four millions of your people, and now you are reduced to 250,000, and we have ab sorbed nearly all your lands. I think it a duty we owe to humanity and to God to extend to your people the benefit and protection of our laws. What I have done to relieve you from imprisonment and captivity in the Indian Territory where, if you had returned your whole band would have been exterminated was from principle, and as a matter of justice. I shall continue to fight your battles as long as it is necessary to give you the protection of the laws, and I rejoice to know that you have come to believe the tomahawk is of no further service to you, and that you have resolved to seek the ways of peace. I ac cept the weapon from your hands, and shall preserve it through the years to come, in memovy of the effort I have made to prevent the extermination of your peo ple. What I have done has been a labor of pleasure. STANDING BEAR RELEASED. 133 I hope you and those who are with you will live to become happy and prosperous, and that any habits of wild life which may still cling to you may drop off as the blighted fruit falls from the trees when shaken by the winds, and that ere long I may hear that you are surrounded with all the comforts and blessings of civ ilized life." Leaving Mr. Webster's residence, Standing Bear visited Mr. Poppleton's rooms. He informed Mr. Poppleton that he was about to leave for the north, and he thought he would call and bid him good-bye. STANDING BEAR TO POPPLETON. He said: "I believe I told you in the court room that God made me and that I was a man. "For many years we have been chased about as a dog chases a wild beast. God sent you to help me. I thank you for what you have done. "I want to get my land back. That is what I long for all the time. I wish to live there and be buried with my fathers. " When you were speaking in the court room of course I could not understand, but I could sec that you were trying very hard to release me. I think you are doing for me and my people something, that never has been done before. " If I had to pay you for it, I could never get enough to do it. I have here a relic which has come down to my people through a great many generations. I do not know how old it is; it may be two or three hundred years old. I desire to present it to you for what you have done for me." 134 THE PONCA CHIEFS. Mr. Poppleton, accepting the gift, said to Standing Bear that he was more than repaid for what he may have done, in the satisfaction he felt in having rescued him and his people, and secured their rights to them; and his satisfaction would be all the deeper should they succeed in maintaining themselves in their new relations and achieving the arts and the freedom and peace of civilized life. The keepsake given by the chief to the great attorney is a rare gift, being esteemed the most sacred, as it is the most venerable object in the possession of the tribe. It resembles a wig, and was worn by the head chief at their most weighty councils. Curiosity-hun ters have often sought to secure it at any price in money, but he has to one and all said that money could not buy it. Among occasions on which it has been worn was that of the first treaty in 1817, we believe made between the Poncas and the government of the United States. Standing Bear, who is himself sixty years of age, informed us that when he was a little boy his father told him that no one in the tribe knew how old it was, and that it had come into their posses sion in generations long past. THE PONCA CHIEFS. 135 APPENDIX SHORTLY after the habeas corpus case was brought in Omaha, to secure the release of Standing Bear and his associates, Bright Eyes, and her father, Iron Eye, head chief for some years of the Omaha tribe, were sent to the In dian Territory to ascertain the condition of the remainder of the Ponca tribe, who were still held as prisoners in that land. While there, Ke-tha-ska (White Eagle), head chief of the tribe, dictated a letter to the people of the United States, which has been pronounced by Rev. Joseph Cook to be, in many passages, as eloquent as the historic speech of Logan. The letter is very long. The following are the closing paragraphs: " He had related at great length the dealings of the chiefs with the agents of the government who came to remove them from their lands in Dakota, and had come to the point where the last peremptory order for their departure had been given : 136 THE PONCA CHIEFS. THE STORY OF WHITE EAGLE. "We then separated, and calling all the men of our tribe together, I said to them, ' My people, we, your chiefs, have worked hard to save you from this. We have resisted until we are worn out, and now we know not what more we can do. We leave the matter into your hands to decide. If you say that we fight and die on our lands, so be it.' There was utter silence. Not a word more was spoken. We all arose and started for our homes, and there we found that in our absence the soldiers had collected all our women and children together, and were standing guard over them. The soldiers got on their horses, went to all the houses, broke open our doors, took our household utensils, put them in their wagons, and, pointing their bayonets at our people, ordered them to move. They took all our plows, mowers, hayforks, grindstones, farming imple ments of all kinds, and everything too heavy to be taken on a journey, and locked them up in a large house. We never knew what became of them after wards. Many of these things of which we were robbed we had bought with money earned by the work of our hands. They promised us more when we should get down here, but we have never received anything in place of them. "We left in our own land two hundred and thirty-six houses which we had built with our own hands. We cut the logs, hauled them, and built them ourselves. We have now, in place of them, six little shanties, built for us by the government. These are one story high, with two doors and two windows. They are full of holes and cracks, and let in the wind and rain. We APPENDIX. 137 hear that our own houses which we left in Dakota have all been pulled down. To show how much tho tribe have been robbed of we will count the household possessions of a single one of our families in Dakota before we came down. Two stoves, one a kitchen stove and the other a parlor stove, with all the accom panying utensils, two bedsteads, two plows and one double plow, one harrow, one spade, two hayforks, one hand-saw, and one large two-handled saw, one grindstone, one hay rake, a cupboard and four chairs. We have now no stoves, chairs, or bedsteads. We have nothing but our tents, and their contents, com posed mostly of clothing. The tribe owned two reap ers, eight mowers, a flour and saw mill. They are gone from us also. We brought with us twenty-five yoke of oxen. They all died when we got here, partly from the effects of the toiisome journey, and partly by disease. We have not one left. We brought with us five hundred horses, and bought at different times after we arrived two hundred more. We have now been here about two years, and during that time we have lost over six hundred, mostly by death; some were stolen by bad men. We have now not one hun dred left of the seven hundred. Our horses died either from the effects of poisonous weeds or disease. The tribe numbered seven hundred when we started. Since we have been here over one hundred and fifty of my people have died. " When people lose what they hold dear to them the heart cries all the time. I speak now to you lawyers who have helped Standing Bear, and to those of you who profess to be God's people. We had thought that there were none to take pity on us and none to help 138 THE PONCA CHIEFS us. We thought all the white men hated us, but now we have seen you take pity on Standing Bear when you heard his story. It may be that you knew noth ing of our wrongs, and, therefore, did not help us. I thank you in the name of our people for what you have done for us through your kindness to Standing Bear, and I ask of you to go still further in your kind ness and help us to regain our land and our rights. You cannot bring our dead back to life, but you can yet save the living. My heart thinks all the time of our dead. I cry day and night for the men, women, and children who have been killed by this land. My eyes were heavy with weeping, but when I heard of your kindness to some of my people I felt as if I might raise my head and open my eyes to see the coming light. I want to save the remainder of my people, and I look to you for help. They cry for their land, and I want to give them back that of which they were robbed. "When I went to see the President, and told him how we had been wronged, he said that those who did the deed were gone, and it was among the things of the past. I now ask the President once again through this message, which I send to all the white people of this land, to rectify his mistake. When a man desires to do what is right, he does not say to himself, 'It does not matter/ when he commits a wrong. his " KHE-THA-SKA, X (White Eagle)." mark. EVIDENCE FROM OFFICIAL RECORDS. All the statements of fact contained in this APPENDIX. 139 book are fully corroborated by the official re ports of the Department of the Interior. The following extracts give a condensed history of the whole transaction. It is hardly likely that any will be so bold as to say this evidence is impeachable, whatever they may say of the statements of the Indians themselves. WHAT KIND OF INDIANS ABE THE PONCAST "The Poncas are good Indians. In mental endow ment, moral character, physical strength and cleanli ness of person they are superior to any tribe I have ever met." [Report of Indian Commissioner, 1878, p. 65.J THE PONCA TITLE. "Article I. The Ponca tribe of Indians hereby cede and relinquish to the United States all that portion of their present reservation as described in the first article of the treaty of March 12, 1858, lying west of the range line between townships numbers thirty-two (32) and thirty-three (33) north, ranges ten (10) and eleven (11) west of the sixth (6) principal meridian, according to the Kansas and Nebraska survey, estimated to con tain thirty thousand acres, be the same more or less. "Article II. In consideration of the cession or release of that portion of the reservation above described by the Ponca tribe of Indians to the government of the United States, the government of the United States, by way of rewarding them for their constant, fidelity to the government and citizens thereof, and with a view of returning to the said tribe of Ponca Indians 140 THE PONCA CHIEFS. their old burying-grounds and corn-fields, hereby cede and relinquish to the tribe of Ponca Indians the follow ing described fractional townships, to wit: (townships described in treaty). But it is expressly understood and agreed that the United States shall not be called upon to satisfy or pay the claims of any settlers for improvements upon the lands above ceded by the United States to the Poncas, but the Ponca tribe of Indians shall, out of their own funds, and at their own expense, satisfy said claimants, should any be found upon said lands above ceded by the United States to the Ponca tribe of Indians." [United States Statutes at large, vol. xiv, page 675.] HOW THE PONCAS WERE REMOVED. 11 Steps are being taken for the removal of the Poncas from their present location in Southeastern Dakota to the Indian Territory. For this removal, conditioned on the consent of the Poncas, Congress at its last session appropriated $25,000." [Report of Indian Commissioner, 1876, pp. 16, 17.] DID THE PONCAS CONSENT? "The title of the old Ponca reservation in Dakota still remains in the Poncas, they having signed no pa pers relinquishing their title, nor having violated any of the provisions of the treaty by which it was ceded to them by the government. These Indians claim that the government had no right to remove them from their reservation without first obtaining from them by treaty or purchase the title which they have acquired from the government, and for which they had rendered APPENDIX. a valuable consideration." [Report of Indian Commis sioner, 1877, p. 101.] " More than three-fourths of the tribe refused to leave their old reservation in Dakota, stating, as re ported to me, that they preferred to remain and die on their native heath in defence of their homes, and what they claimed to be their rights in the land composing the reservation on which they were living, than to leave there and die by disease in the unhealthy mias matic country which they claimed had been selected for them in the Indian Territory." [Report of Indian Commissioner, 1877, p. 96.] FATE OF NORTHERN INDIANS SENT TO INDIAN TERRITORY. " The effect of a radical change of climate is disas trous, as this (the. Pawnee) tribe alone, in the first two years, lost by death over 800 out of its number of 2,376. The northern Cheyennes have suffered severely, and the Poncas, who arrived there in July last, have al ready lost 36 by death, which, by an ordinary compu tation, would be the death rate for the entire tribe for a period of four years. In this connection, I recom mend the removal of all the Indians in Colorado and Arizona to the Indian Territory. "^[E. A. Hayt, in In dian Commissioner's Report, 1877, pp. 5, 6.] WERE THE PONCAS WRONGED? " In this removal, I am sorry to be compelled to say, the Poncas were wronged. They gave up lands, houses, and agricultural implements. But the removal inflicted a far greater injury upon the Poncas, for which no 142 THE PONCA CHIEFS. reparation can be made the loss by death of many of their number by change of climate." [Report of In dian Commissioner, 1878, pp. xxxvi. and xxxvii.] WHY IT WAS POSSIBLE TO COMMIT THIS WRONG. " My predecessors have frequently called attention to the startling fact that we have within our midst 275,000 people for whom we provide no law. " [Report of In dian Commissioner, 1876, p. 9.] THE COMMISSIONER'S CLAIMS TO ABSOLUTE POWEB OVER INDIANS REGARDLESS OP COURTS. i " The Commissioner of Indian Affairs says with refer ence to the habeas corpus case at Omaha, M'here a writ was served on General Crook, commanding him to show cause why he holds Standing Bear and other Ponca In dians as prisoners, that the United States district-at torney has been directed to appear for the United States and endeavor to have the writ dismissed. He takes the ground that under the law, and according to repeated decisions of the Supreme Court, the Indians stand as wards of the government, and are under the same relations to the government as minors to their parents or guardians; that the law forbids them to make contracts, and such contracts if made by them are void. No attorney has the right or can appear for an Indiao, until authorized to do so by the Indian Department." [Associated Press telegram, April 10, 1879.] APPENDX. . 143 INDIAN CHARACTERISTICS. The Indians have been so long and so con stantly misrepresented by those whose interest it has been to rob them, and have had special facilities for disseminating falsehoods concern ing them, that it seems only appropriate to close this little volume with some general statements which are known to be true by all those ac quainted with them. In the first place there never was such a thing as a nomadic tribe of American Indians. The Indian is more strongly attached to the spot where is located his village and graveyard than any other human being. They have fought al most to utter extermination, time and again, in the hope of retaining their lands. The idea that an Indian is naturally blood thirsty and delights only in torture and cruelty, is almost too absurd to deserve con tradiction. When at peace there are no more generous, kindly and sympathizing people on the earth. It is, however, a fact that when they go to war, they seek to exterminate their ene mies, and in the rage of battle seldom spare age or sex. 144 THE PONCA CHIEFS. It is also a fact, which no person desiring the truth to be known will question, that for the last fifteen or twenty years, in nearly every prominent council which has been held with the western Indians, they have earnestly petitioned for schools and farming implements, and many speeches are on record in the gov ernment reports protesting against the issue of rations. Their leading and most intelligent chiefs have said time and again, that as long as rations and clothing were issued to a people they would not work, and they desired the rations stopped, and farming implements issued and schools established in their stead. Any one can arrive at a just conception of the Indian who will take for his first premise, that an Indian is a human being, subject to like pas sions, desires and ambitions, and adopting the same mode of reasoning, as the other por tions of the human race would under similar circumstances. The prominent traits of Indian character are honesty, generosity, gratitude, attachment to home and country, and love of family and friends. In speaking of one of their traits of character, Gen. George Crook, Commander of the Department of the Platte, says, " The Indian APPENDIX. 145 in his nature is in one respect the opposite of the Chinaman. The latter is frugal, even to abstemiousness, and economical to the verge of parsimoniousness; the former frequently at feasts and dances gives away the bulk of his possessions to needy friends and relatives."* The cause of all our troubles with them s* may be summed up in the words of the closing paragraph of the above letter. These words should command the attention of the American people. Gen. Crook has been among the Indians for nearly thirty years. He has by force of character and honesty of purpose in all his transactions risen from the rank of Brevet Second Lieutenant to that of Brigadier- General in the Army of the United States. There is no man in America so well qualified to speak upon the subject, and he says of the Indian: " When his horses and cattle arc big enough to be of service, they are driven off in herds by white renegades; when his wheat and corn and vegetables are almost ready for the market, his reservation is changed, and sometimes, as in the case of the Poncas, he is compelled to abandon everything. Were we to treat some of our foreign immigrants in such a manner, * See letter in New York Triirune, Oct. 16th, 1879. 146 THE PONCA CHIEFS. it would not take long to turn them into prowling vagabonds, living by robbery and as sassination." Therefore the solution of the Indian prob lem lies in these propositions: Acknowledge their manhood and humanity, give them titles in fee simple to their lands, non-transferraMe for say twenty years, that tlfeir children may become accustomed to their new life; stop the issue of rations, issue to them farming imple ments, live stock and seeds; extend over them the common school system; protect them from wrong by the regular processes of law; punish the individuals among them who commit crime, after fair trials in the courts, and not hold the tribe responsible, make war and kill innocent persons for the crimes of others; abolish the traderships; let them sell their products where they can get the best prices, and buy where they can buy the cheapest. Then, being equal before the Jaw, and their lives and property protected by it, they will rapidly* advance, and the Indian Bureau can close its accounts. THE END. OPINION OF BOSTON^ MERCHANTS. At a meeting held in the Merchants' Exchange, November 25, 1879, Mr. Edward Atkinson presented the following pre amble and resolutions, which were unanimonsly adopted : Whereas, The Ponca Indians, a civilized and peaceful tribe, appear to have been unlawfully and unjustly deprived of their lands, their houses, and their property, and have been banished from their homes, where they were living in peace, in quiet, in happiness and prosperity, to a distant land, unfitted to their wants and unhealthy in its climate ; and Whereas, This action on the part of our government is unworthy of a Christian people, and merits the reprobation of all who love justice and liberty and who hate oppression and wrong, it is hereby Resolved, That it is the duty of the government to accord to these Indians their just and equal rights, and to restore to them their homes and property. Resolved, That, in the name of humanity and the high civili zation that marks this age and ought to characterize this people, we protest against the policy that has been adopted in regard to the treatment of the Indian tribes ; a treatment alike condemned by the justice of God and the laws and sentiments of a Christian commonwealth. Resolved, That, while expressing our abhorrence of the cruelties to which the Ponca Indians have been subjected, im mediate measures should be taken to secure for them their legal rights and protection in their persons and property. Resolved, That the Indians are persons, and, in accordance with the fundamental provisions of the Constitution of the United States, that no person within their limits shall be deprived of l|fe, liberty, or property without due process of law, should be recognized as such ; that they should be amen able to law, and possess the rights that are accorded those of every nationality, race, or color, residing in our land. All the profits accruing from the sale of this book at public meetings, held in belialf of the Indians, will be devoted to securing, through the regular processes of the courts, the recovery of the lands taken by force from the Ponca Indians, and to settling the question, by a decision of the highest legal tribunal of the country, whether the life and property of an Indian can be protected by law.