,1TY OP' 1-J ^- I Useful Reference Series, No. 4 MODERN DRAMA AND OPERA MODERN DRAMA AND OPERA A Reading List on the Works of D'ANNUNZIO, HAUPTMANN, IBSEN, JONES, MAETER- LINCK, PHILLIPS, PINERO, ROSTAND, SHAW, SUDERMANN and of DEBUSSY, PUCCINI, RICHARD STRAUSS Compiled by Mrs. CLARA (MULLIKEN) NORTON FRANK K. WALTER FANNY ELSIE MARQUAND BOSTON, MASS. THE BOSTON BOOK COMPANY 1911 Originally issued in the Bulletin of Bibliography, 1907, 1908, 1911, but greatly extended and with additions for this publi- cation in book form. Part I MODERN DRAMAS BY MRS. CLARA (MULLIKEN) NORTON B. A. (Nebraska); B. L. S. (N. Y. State Library School) and FRANK K. WALTER Vice-Director, New York State Library School ^ 1 54« PREFACE TO PART I This list aims to cover the best English editions or translations of the dramatic works of these authors, whether published in collections or separately. The an- notations and references to critical reviews accompanying the dramas listed are followed by general critical and biographical articles selected from sources in English, and include separate books, periodicals and analytical chap- ters of books. Much additional matter and many more of the partic- ular dramas of these authors are to be found in the native tongue in which they write. This is notably true of Hauptmann and Sudermann. Stoeckius, in his " Naturalism in Modern German Drama," includes a full biographical list of the German material relating to Hauptmann. In the cases of Ibsen and Maeterlinck the number of translated dramas tallies closely with the number of originals. For a fairly com- plete list of their published plays see Hale's "Dramatists of To-day." The publisher is given for each volume of plays, and in most cases prices are quoted. No abbre- viations not immediately intelligible to the user have been included. With few exceptions the books listed have been personally examined by the compiler. PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION OF PART I The principal changes made in the entries of the first edition, prepared by Mrs. Norton in 1906, have been additional citations of reviews, alternati\e editions available, and the correction of a few obvious errors. The general purpose has not been changed and no attempt at completeness or scholarly bias made. A liberal policy of selection has been followed and an attempt made to keep the list fairly to date. More than two hundred additional entries of books, periodical articles and ana- lyticals have been made and more than four hundred additional citations made to reviews. A table of con- tents and a title index of dramas mentioned have been made. In the sections on criticism, a number of acted but unpublished plays, with critical references, have been noted. Two new sections, on Henry Arthur Jones and Pinero, permit some comparative study of the "literary drama" of the first edition and the "stage play" as represented in the work of these two prominent English playwrights. As the original notes on these sections were destroyed in the New York State Library fire credit for their present form is largely due to three members of the class of 1911 of the New York State Library School: Mrs. Philip L. Allen and Mr. Sylvester J. Carter, who collected the material on which the present section on Pinero is based, and Miss Ruth F. Eliot who collected that on Henry Arthur Jones. CONTENTS PART I MODERN DRAMA Page Modern Drama: its Traits, Tendencies and Technique 11 D'Annunzio: — Plays 18 Criticism 19 Hauptmann: — Plciys 21 Criticism 23 Ibsen: — Plays 25 Criticism 29 Jones, Henry Arthur: ^ Plays 34 Non-dramatic works 38 Criticism 38 Maeterlinck: — Plays 41 Criticism 44 Phillips : — Plays 47 Criticism 48 Pinero : — Plays 50 Non-dramatic works 55 Criticism 55 Rostand: — Plays ^. 58 Criticism 59 Shaw: — Plays (collected) Gl Works published separately <)4 Criticism 64 Sudermann: — Plays / 07 Criticism 69 9 10 CONTENTS PART II MODERN OPERA Page Abbreviations for Periodicals referred to in Part II 72 Debussy 73 Puccini 75 Strauss, Richard 80 INDEX Title-index of Plays and Operas 89 THE MODERN DRAMA; ITS TRAITS, TENDENCIES AND TECHNIQUE Adams, William Davenport, comp. Dictionary of the drama; a guide to the plays, playwrights, players and playhouses of the United Kingdom and America from the earliest times, v. 1. O. Phil., 1904. Lippincott, $3. To be complete in 2 v. Finds a place here merely as a guidebook to a vast body of varied theatrical publications. Reviewed in Nation. Xov. 17. 1904, 79:400. Archer, William. Study and stage, a yearbook of criticism. 2,3U p. D. Lend., 1899. Richards, 5s. One year's notes on the stage, written in journalistic style, but level-headed and intelligent in perspective. Mr. Archer is the eminent translator of most of Ibsen's dramas. Reviewed in Academy. Dec. 1899, 57: 715-16; Saturday Rev., Nov. 18, 1899, 88: 643; Spectator, June 30, 1900.84:903. Baughan, E. A. Literature in drama. Fortnightly Rev. 90: 775-82. Nov.. 1908. Same, Living Age, 259: 781-7. Dec. 26. 1908. Discusses modern literary possibilities of the drama. Borsa, Mario. English stage of todav; tr. by Selwyn Brinton. O. Lond.. 1908. Lane. .'J2.50. Discusses most of the present prominent dramatists in an in- teresting, scholarly fashion. Reviewed in Academy, Dec. 14, 1907, 73: 250; Athenaeum. Feb. 15, 1908. 1: 204; Dial. .\pr. 10, 1908. 44: 248; Inde- pendent, May 7, 1908, 64: 1039; Nation, Dec. 26. 1907. 85: 594; Putnam's. May. 1908. 4: 234. Clarence, Reginald. "The Stage" cyclopedia; a bibli- ography of plavs. 503 p. O. Lond. 1909. "The Stage." 10s. 6d. "An alphabetical list of plays and other stage pieces of which any record can be found since the commencement of the English Stage, together with descriptions, authors' names, dates and places of production." Chiefly useful in tracing, through titles and dates of pro- duction, criticisms and descriptive articles not recorded in the ordinary periodical inde.x and for the frequent references to sources and adaptations. Clapp, Henry Austin. Reminiscences of a dramatic critic, with an essav on the art of Henry Irving. 241 p. O. Bost.. 1902. Houghton, .S1.75. The American stage during the last thirty years. His criti- cisms are full of taste and penetration. Spectator. Colby, Frank Moore. Adventures of a plav-goer. :.SVc hi< Imaginary obligations. 1904. p. 118-66.) Colton, Arthur. Drama and the play. (See North Ameri- can Rev., Jan., 1911, 193: 72-S2.) Comparison of the "literary drama" and "the stage play." 11 12 MODERN DRAMA Courtney, William Leonard. Modern social drama as intkR'ncctl 1)\ [he no\cl. (See Fortnightly Rev-., 1902, 77: 000-74.)' A lecture delivered in Feb., 1902, at the Birmingham and Midland Institute. Mr. Courtney is editor of the Fortnightly Review and is prominent as a dramatic critic. Eaton, Walter Prichard. At the New Theatre and others; the .American stage: its problems and per- formances. 359 p. O. Bost., 1910. Small, SI. 50 net. "Survey of the American stage during the two seasons of 190S-1(). .V sound but slightly biased account of the theatrical syndicate is followed by a discussion of the virtues and defects of the New Theatre, criticism of the plays produced there and at other New York theatres, and a number of dramatic essays." A. L. A. Book List. Reviewed in Nation. Nov. 24. 1910, 91: 505; N. Y. Times. Nov. 12, 1910. I.-): 030. Faguet, Emile. The symbolical drama. {See Inter- national Mo., Dec, 1903, 8: 329-41.) A member of the French Academy gives definite ideas as to the existence of symbolism in the different dramas of Ibsen and Maeterlinck. Faxon, Frederick Winthrop. Dramatic Index, 1909-10- Boston Book Co. 2 v. sq. O. 1910-11. $3.50 each. -Annual cumulation, with additions, of the quarterly lists [n the Biillelin of Bibliography. Also forms Part II of the annual Magazine Subject-Index. (Boston Book Co., .?5.50 per vol.) Includes references to periodical articles relating to dramatic authors, criticisms, plots, portraits, and dramatic illustrations. Pilon, Pierre Marie Augustin. The English stage- being an account of the Victorian drama; tr. from the French by Frederic WTiyte, with an introduction by H. A. Jones. 319 p. O. N. Y., 1897. Dodd, S2.50. Appeared first in Revue des deux mondes. Includes sum- maries, criticisms and prophecies, with chapters on Pinero and Ibsen. Reviewed in VVestminster Rev., Feb., 1S97, 147: 151-5, by Stoddard Dewey. Fiske, Mrs. Minnie Maddern. Matter of the play. {See International Mo.. 1902, 5: 629-44.) Concerned with the stage interpretation of the problem play. Francke, Kuno. History of German literature as deter- mined by social forces. Ed. 4. 595 p. O. N. Y., 1901. Holt, S2.50. An enlargement of his Social Forces in German Literature to include a treatment of contemporary German drama. A scholarly work summing up the complex forces in modern German society, but not always just in criticizing the details of the different dramas. Freytag, Gustav. Technique of the drama; an exposi- tion of the dramatic composition and art . . . tr. from the 6th German ed. by E. J. MacEwan. Ed. 3. 395 p. D. Chic, 1900. Scott, Foresman, $1.50. One of the best-known general discussions of the subject. Needs supplementing with later material but still one of the familiar references in college courses. GafEney, Fannie Humphreys. Modern dramatic real- ism. {See Arena, Apr., 1903, 29: 391-6.) Greenslet, Ferris. Theory of the drama. {See Forum, July, 1899, 27: 631-40.) A thoughtful discussion of dramatic pleasure and its source. MODERN' DRAMA 13 Hale, Edward Everett, Jr. Dramatists of today: Ros- tand, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Pinero, Shaw, Phillips, Maeterlinck; being an informal discussion of their significant work. 236 p. D. N. Y.. 1905. Holt, $1.50. "Essays reprinted partly from the Dial, dealing mainly with continental plays seen on the American stage. Of lighter weight and narrower scope than Huneker's Icono- clasts. Temperate, conservative, readable, reliable." A chatty and entertaining book for the general reader to consult first, but one which he may safely neglect for the further study of any particular author. The bibliographic lists add to its value as a popular guide. Reviewed in Atlantic Mo., June, 1905, 95: 842; Nation, July 6. 1905, 81: 14; Outlook. May VS. 1905, 80: 138; Dial, May 16, 1905, 38: 357; Critic, July, 1905, 47: 90. Hamilton, Clayton Meeker. Theory of the theatre and other principles of dramatic criticism. 251 p. D. N. Y.. 1910. Holt, §1.50. "Papers that illustrate certain steady principles of dramatic criticism." Bk. Rev. Digest. "A live book, tho not a permanent one." Independent. Reviewed in Bookman, May. 1910, 31: 301; Dial. June 16, 1910, 48: 420; Independent, Sept. 1. 1910, 69: 484; Nation, May 19. 1910. 90: 518; Review of Reviews, June, 1910, 41: 768. Hapgood, Norman. Stage in America, 1897-1900. 40S p. D. X. v., 1001. Macmillan, .SI. 75. Disussis the syndicate, theatrical conditions, prevailing types of pl.iNs, prominent actors, plays and dramatists. "Even those who are unable to agree unreservedly with his precepts and conclusions will appreciate the vigor and general intelli- gence of his convictions and his comprehension of the funda- mental principles upon which the theatre must be conducted if it is to demonstrate its right to be considered an art." Reviewed in Bookman, 13: 241; Nation, 72: 401; Dial, 30: 335; Spectator, May, 1901, 1: 704; Literature, 8: 465; Critic, 41: 129. Theory of dramatic criticism. (See Forum, Mar., 1899, 27: 120.) • A plea for more breadth of mind in our dramatic critics, disparaging those who prudishly moralize upon the evils of the stage and remain blind to the art of the play and to its social mission. Henderson, Archibald. Evolution of dramatic tech- nique. {See North American Rev., Mar., 1909, 189: 428-44.) The drama is not stationary in form but progressive in development. Hennequin, Alfred. Art of playwriting; being a prac- tical treatise on the elements of dramatic construc- tion, intended for the playwright, the studer»t and the dramatic critic. 187 p. D. Bost., cl890. Houghton, SI. 25. Has the faults of similar manuals, but includes some fairly good analyses of dramatic art in general. Herrmann, Oscar. Living dramatists: Pinero, Ibsen, .D'Annunzio; introduction by W. \V. Massee. O. N. Y., 1905. Brentano, S5 net. Hogg, Wentworth. Guide to selecting plays. 190 p. U. X. v., lUlO. S. P'rcnch. paper. 25c. "It has not been my intention to write any critical re- marks . . . my sole desire being to give ... a concise sum- mary of the plot, the number and nature of the characters and some idea of the necessary scenery." Preface. 14 MODERN DRAMA Huneker, James Gibbons. Iconoclasts, a book of (Iruiiuitists: Il)seii, Sliindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard Shaw. 430 p. O. N. Y., 1905. Scribner, SI. 50 net. Brilliant and original characterizations of the symbolistic and revolutionary dramatists. The subjects of the essays correspond closely to those included in this bibliography. Stimulating, broadening in judgment, and pre-supposing some knowledge of the matter criticized. "W.hat one misses in his work is repose and finish and a careful avoidance of too gen- eral observations." The greater part of the foregoing essays, now completely revised, first appeared in the New York Sun. They also appeared in single numbers in The Lamp. Reviewed in Athenaeum, August, 1905, 2: 284; Atlantic, Mo., June, 1905, 95:841. by H. W. Boynton; Dial, May 16, 1905. 38: 357 ; Outlook. May 13, 1905. 80: 140. Jerome, Jerome K. Problem of the problem play. {See Harper's Weekly. Dec. 10, 1904, 48: 1916-18.) Kerr, S. P. What are immoral plays? {See Westminster Rev., Apr., 1901, 155: 444-50.) Answer to Allan Laidlaw's What are immoral plays? chal- lenging his theory and presenting a more solid and tempered argument. Laidlaw, Allan. Drama on the downward grade, 1868- 1898. (5ee Westminster Rev., Mar., 1900, 15.3:317-23.) Scattered remarks to prove that one form of drama is degenerating and giving place to a form of a higher kind. What are immoral plays? {See Westminster Rev., Aug., 1900, 154: 212-16.) Answers the question in an original but fantastic manner. The argument, in the somewhat difficult case of art or morals, is against repression of these plays on the stage. A sounder statement is found in S. P. Kerr's article in Westminster Rev., 155: 444-50. McCracken, Elizabeth. The play and the gallery. {See Atlantic Mo., 89: 497-507.) The effect of the theatre upon the social and moral stand- ards of the tenements. Published also in the Outlook, May, 1902, 71: 169-78. Mackaye, Percy Wallace. Playhouse and the play, and other addresses concerning the theatre and democracy in America. 210 p. D. N. Y., 1909. Macmillan, $1.25. Five essays by a rising young American play-writer, dealing generally with the significance of the theatre in American civic life. Reviewed in Independent, July 8, 1909, 67: 93, Nation, May G, 1909, 88: 409; Review of Reviews, June, 1909, 39: 767. Maeterlinck, Maurice. The modern drama. {See his The double garden. D. 1904. N. Y. Dodd, $1.40.) Marked by distinction of style and freshness of vision. Suggestive if not convincing. An article under the same title, translated by Alfred Sutro, appeared in the Cornhill Mag., Aug., 1899, 80: 166-73. Of our anxious morality. {See Fortnightly Rev., Jan., 1906, 85: 46-01.) Translated by Alexander Teixeira de Mattos. Manager vs. critic. {See Everybody's July, 1909, 21: 119-30.) Discussion of manager's attitude toward frank criticism. Critic's side by H. Davis; manager's, by P. Armstrong. MODERN DRAMA 15 Matthews, Brander. Development of the drama. 351 p. D. N. Y.. VMi. Scribner, SI. 25 net. Mr. Matthews is a playwright and a critic of distinction who writes with charm, sincerity and effect. Reviewed in Nation, Oct. 29, 190;j, 77: 346-7; Lamp, Nov., 1903. 27: 329-32. Inquiries and opinions. 305 p. D. N. Y.. 1907. Scribner, SI. 25. Includes Apology for technic (p. 51-71); Modern novel and the modern play (p. 181-20t); Literary merit of our latter-day drama (p. 207-25); Ibsen the playwright (p. 229-79); Art of the stage-manager (p. 283-305). Makers of drama of today. (See Atlantic Mo., Apr., 1903, 91: 504-12.) Historical sketch of dramatic progress during the nine- teenth century. Mr. Matthews is distinguished as a critic of French drama. Revival of the poetic drama. (See Atlantic Mo., Feb., 1908, 101: 219-24.) The poetic play must be dramatic as well as poetic. Studv of the drama. 320 p. D. Bost., 1910. Hough- ton, SI. 50. "A study of the technic of the drama. It is intended, not for those who want to write plays, but for those who wish to learn how plays are written now and how they were written in the past. . . . In other words, this study is devoted mainly to an examination of the structural framework which the great dramatists of various epochs have given to their plays; and it discusses only incidentally the psychology, the phil- osophy and the poetry which we now admire in these pieces." Preface. Reviewed in .Athenaeum, July 2, 1910, 2: 23; Bookman, Apr. 1910,31: 183; Dial,.-Vpr. 10. 1910, 48: 268; Educational Rev. Apr., 1910, .39: 422; Sept.. 1910. 40: 207; Forum, May, 1910, 43: 558; Literarv Digest. .Apr. 2. 1910, 40: 6.58; Nation, Apr. 14, 1010. 90: 3S2; Review of Reviews. June, 1910, 41: 768. Merington, Marguerite. What constitutes a plav? (See North American Rev., Dec, 1902, 175: 863-70.) "That the persons of the play, under e.xtraordinary con- ditions, shall produce on an audience the effect of human nature, is the touchstone of the playwright's art." (The) play once more. (See Outlook. Feb. 4, 1911,97: 258-60.) Discusses the recent revival of the drama as a ix)pular literary form. Potter, Helen. The drama of the twentieth centurv. (See Arena, Feb., 1900, 23: 157-66.) A rambling attempt to show the evolution toward the realization of a new idea — that of a "conditioned stage with a conditioned audience." Price, William T. Technique of the drama; a statement of the principles involved in the value of dramatic material, in the construction of plavs and in dramatic criticism. 287 p. D. N. Y., 1897. Brentano, S1.50. Scott, Clement. Drama of yesterday and today. 2 v. O. Lond.. 1899. Macmillan. S7. "Result of forty years' keen observation, enthusiastic and competent. Valuable especially as a history of the stage, and for its chronicle of plays in the appendix. Its repetition, gossip and needless bulk detract from its readable interest." Reviewed in Athenaeum. Dec. 23, 1899: 874-5. 16 MODERN DRAMA Scott, Clement. Two dramatic revolutions. {See Noitli Aiiicrican Rev., 157: 470-84.) .1 non-Puritanic and violent attack on Ibsen's Ghosts and the Si^cond Mrs. Tanqueray, decrying their pessimism and irreverence and the "art that makes evil Rood upon the stai; •." Mr. Scott is dramatic critic for the Daily Telegraph. Shaw, George Bernard. Dramatic opinions and essays; containing ... a word on tlic dramatic opinions and essays of G. Bernard Shaw, by James Huneker. 2 v. D. N. Y.. 190G. Brentano, S2.50 net. Criticisms of Ibsen. Sudermann and Rostand are scattered throuRh this collection, made up of the papers contributed by Mr. Shaw in his capacity as dramatic critic to the Lon- don Saturday Review, 1895-98. Strang, Lewis C. Plays and players of the last quarter of a century. 2v. D. N. Y. (?), 190.3. Concise sketches of the leading actors and dramatists and their work. The criticism is usually sound, but is from the point of view of the stage, rather than of the literary critic. Symons, Arthur. Plays, acting and music. D. N. Y., I'JO;?. Dutton, $2 net. "Leader and follower of the school of symbolists, Mr. Symons with true critical gifts here uncovers the veil of mysti- cism that hangs about them." The book is mainly concerned with the continental drama. Clearly defined individual views about the artistic features of the drama are expressed in beautiful prose. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., 96: 360; Academy, Sept. 19, 11903, 6.5: 261; .\thenaeum, Dec, 1903: 762; Dial, 37: 62. Tree, Herbert Beerbohm. Some aspects of the drama of today. (See North American Rev., Jan., 1897, 164: 66-74.) .A. critical outline of the essentials of the art of the stage. Of value because Mr. Tree is himself an actor-manager. Walkley, Arthur Bingham. Drama and life. 331 p. D. N. Y., 1908. Brentano, $1.75. Essays and critiques chiefly on recent dramatists and actors and dramatic technique reprinted from the Edinburgh Review and London Time%. Reviewed in Forum, .^pr.. 1908, 39: .5.50-60 and North American Rev., May, 1908, 187: 777, by F. M. Colby; Atheneeum, Feb., 1908, 1: 140; Nation, May 28, 1908, 86: 496. Dramatic criticism; three lectures delivered at the Royal Institution, Feb.. 1903. 125 p. D. Lond.. 1903. Murray, 5s net. These lectures on The Ideal Spectator, The Dramatic Critic, Old and New Criticism, dealing with stage criticism in the main, are lucid and reliable. Playhouse impressions. D. Lond., 1892. Unwin. o. p. Reprints from London periodicals on modern actors and dramatists including Ibsen, Dumas, Sardou, Daudet, H. A. Jones. Pinero, etc. Readable and reliable. Wedmore, Frederick. Literature and the theatre. {See Nineteenth Century. Apr., 1902, 51: 508-80.) Claims that the two can be divorced. Studies of Pinero, Becque and Horvieu incidentally made in comparing the English and French stage. West, Kenyon. Dramatic criticism. {See Era, July. 1903, 12: .39-44.) On the ideal dramatic critic and playwright and their re- sponsibilities in interpreting the public taste. MODERN DRAMA 17 Witkowski, George. German drama of the nineteenth century; authorized translation from the 2d German ed. by L. E. Horning. 230 p. D. N. Y., 1909. Holt, «1. "Nothing at the same time so comprehensive and terse has appeared on the subject." N. Y. Times. Reviewed in Educational Rev., Sept., 1909, 38: 205; Forum, Sept., 1909, 42: 282; Independent, Sept. 2.J, 1909, (57: 709. Woodbridge, Elisabeth. The drama, its laws and its technique, l.bl p. D. Bost.. 1898. Allyn, 80c. net. Founded on F"rey tag's Technique of the Drama adapted to modern .\merican use. Contains a good, short bibliography. A.L. A. Catalog. 1904, p. 181. D'ANNUNZIO Annunzio, Gabriele d'. Daughter of Jorio, a pastoral tragedy; tr. by Cliarlotte Porter, Pietro Isola and Alice Henry; with an introduction by Miss Porter. 51+208 p. D. Bost.. 1907. Little, $1.50. Published also by Badger, Bost., 1911, $1.50. "Presents with intense human touches a picture of patri- archal peasant life." Bk. Rev. Digest. Reviewed in Outlook, Jan. 18, 1908, 88: 142; Review of Reviews, Feb., 1908, 37: 255; Poet-lore, 1908, 19: 111-19, by Pietro Isola. (The) dead city: a tragedy, rendered into English by G. Mantellini; illustrated from the stage produc- tions of Eleonora Duse. 282 p. D. Chic, 1902. Laird, S1.25. "A sympathetic and admirable translation." William Sharp. Action takes place in Greece on the plain of Argolis. The play, a strange introduction of the fatality of the Greek tragedy on the modern stage, has been received with almost equal praise and censure. Morbid, vitiated, gloomy and overwrought in description, it is beautiful in its original phrasing and construction. Reviewed in Academy, June 2, 1900, 58: 464-6; Saturday Rev., Sept. 22, 1900, 90: 366; Dial. Jan. 1, 1903, 34: 8-9, by H. D. Sedg\vick, Jr.; Critic, Dec, 1902, 41: 574-5. (The) dream of an autumn sunset; tr. from the Italian by Anna Schenck. {See Poet-lore, Jan.-Mar., 1904, 15: 6-29.) The setting of this one-act, one-scene play is picturesquely described "as a domain of a patrician of Venice, on the bank of the Brenta." Lurid, violent and unremittingly hysterical, it is the opposite extreme of the beautiful dreaminess of his Spring Morning. Dream of a spring morning; a play; tr. from the Italian by Anna Schenck. {See Poet-lore, 1902, 14: e-36.) A long, one-act play in five scenes. The argument is much the same as that of Romeo and Juliet, a morbid motive of Isabella's madness and hysterical passion worked out with delicate and exquisite pathos and promising dramatic possi- bilities. Francesca da Rimini; tr. by Arthur Symons. 22.3 p. D. N. Y., cl902. Stokes, $1. In an introductory analysis the translator says. "This play is more than a tragedy of two lovers, it is a study of an age of blood in the 13th century in Italy." The long, beautifully told story, with its luxurious descriptions, symbolic color and allusion, is developed with more conciseness and delicate reserve than the author has shown in any other of his dramas yet translated. Reviewed in Kuhns, L. O., Great poets of Italy, 1903, p. 331-9; Walkley, A. B., Drama and Life, 1908, p. 255-9; Arena, Feb., 1908, 39: 144-8, by A. Henderson; Fortnightly Rev., Feb., 1902, 77: 237-46, bv Arthur Symons; Athenaeum, -Apr. 11, 1903, 1: 475; Dial. Jan. 1, 1903, 34: 9, by H. D. Sedg- wick, Jr.; North American Rev., July, 1902, 175: 17-30. by Mrs. Edith Wharton; Poet-lore, 1908, 19: 111-19, by Pietro Isola; Saturday Rev., July 25, 1903, 96: 114. 18 D'ANNUNZIO 19 Annunzio, Gabriele d'. Gioconda; tr. by Arthur Synions. 144 p. U. X. Y.. 1902. Russell, SI. Has bei-'n received in the Italian theatres as one of the most remarkable plays of modern Italian drama. The author's quick eye for all shades of force, strangeness, magic and delight, make it a tragedy of great beauty and power. The character analysis in Silvia reveals a strong woman's soul. The motive — the contest between the life of art and the everyday life of home — is so bold in treatment and develop- ment as not to allure the average reader or listener. Its con- structive fault is its excess of dialogue over movement. Reviewed in VValkley, A. B., Drama and Life, 1908, p. 251- 4; Academy, Oct., 1901, 61: 330-8; Critic, Dec, 1902, 41: 574-5; Poet-lore, 1908, 19: 111-19, by Pietro Isola. Ship (La nave). Bost., 1909. Badger. SI. 25. o. p- ".■\n awful theme is coldly imagined, the fancy is deliberately flogged to the verge of insane hallucinations and a magnificent rhetoric offers itself as a substitute for the more spontaneous and durable traits of genuine invention." Reviewed in Current Literature, Apr., 1908, 44: 420-1; Fortnightly Rev., May, 1908, 89: 860-73; Nation, Feb. 6, 1908, 86: 133-4. Criticism Annunzio, Gabriele d'. Martyrdom of St. Sebastian (San Sebastiano). A mystery play written in archaic French verse with music by Debussy. Produced in Paris in June. 1911. Reviewed in N. Y. Tribune, Sunday, June 4, 1911; Nation, Mar. 2, 1911, 92: 211. Cooper, Frederic Taber. Gabriele d'Annunzio. {See Bookman, Mar., 1896, 3: 18-23.) A biographical and critical sketch without reference to his dramas. Courtney, William Leonard. D'Annunzio. {See his Development of Maurice Maeterlinck and other sketches of foreign writers. 1904.) Crawford, Virginia M. Gabriele d'Annunzio. {See her Studies in foreign literature. 1899. p. 1S6-218.) De la Ramee, Louise. Gabriele d'Annunzio. {See her Critical studies. 1900. p. 1-49.) Under her pseudonym "Ouida," the writer has also written an appreciation of "The genius of D'.\nnunzio" which appeared in the Fortnightly Rev., Mar., 1897, 67: 349-73. A clear ex- position of his mind and literary tendencies. Fornaro, Carlo de. D'Annunzio, the man. {See Critic. Aug., 1904, 4."): l.'37-41.) .\ personal sketch with pictures. Fornaro, Sofia de. Italian writers of today. {See Critic, Aug.. 1902. 41: 103-5.) Includes a sli«ht characterization of D'Annunzio. Herrmann, Oscar. Living dramatists: Pinero, Ibsen, D'Annunzio; introduction by Will \V. Massee. 1S7 p. O. N. Y., 1905. Brentano, S5 net. Isola, Pietro. Gabriele D'Annunzio's dramas. {See Poet-lore. 1908. 19: 111-19.) Criticisms of Gioconda. Francesca da Rimini and Figlia di Jorio. 20 D'ANNUNZIO Italian poets of today. (See Quarterly Rev., 1902, 196: 24t)-()S.) D'Annunzio's dramas, characteristics, melancholy and love of the- inysterious are the topics discussed. Kuhns, Levi Oscar. The great poets of Italy, together with a brief connecting sketch of Italian literature, with portraits. 359 p. U. Bost., 190.3. Houghton, S2 net. "Elementary introduction to the history of Italian litera- ture, expanded from a study of the Italian poets prepared for Chautauqua circles." D'Annunzio is considered in the chapter on "Nineteenth century" and particular study is given to "Francesca da Rimini." Reviewed in Dial. Dec. 1, 1903, 35: 418. by W. M. Payne. Sedgwick, Henry Dwight. D'Annunzio, poet and play- wright. (See Dial, Jan. 1, 1903, .34: 7-10.) In his volume of Essays on Great Writers Mr. Sedgwick gives a longer and closer study of "D'Annunzio, the novel- ist," which throws light on the general style and character of the man. Sharp, 'Williani. The dramas of Gabriele D'Annunzio. [See Fortnightly Rev., Sept., 1900, 74: 391-409.) Minutely detailed and competent analysis of each of his dramas published prior to the publication of the article. Symons, Arthur. D'Annunzio. (See his Studies in prose and verse. 1904. p. 129-42.) A significant work of criticism by a judicial critic. He writes briefly but always pregnantly. Wharton, Mrs. Edith. The three Francescas. (See North American Rev., July, 1902, 175: 17-30.) Comparison of Phillips, Crawford and D'Annunzio in their treatment of the same general theme. HAUPTMANN Hauptmann, Gerhart. And Pippa dances; a mystical talc 1)1 the glass-wiirks in four acts, tr. by Marv Harned. Bost., 1911. Badger, SI. 50. (See also Poet-lore, 1907, 18:289-341.) A study of varying ideals and their effects on those who hold them. Pippa the dancer typifies a different ideal to each of the group of men who contest for her and brings to each joy or sorrow according to his ideal. Reviewed in Edinburgh Rev.. Oct., 1906, 204: 456-8; Independent, Sept. 20, 1900, 01: 092-3; Poet-lore, 20: 121- 8, Mar.-Apr., 1909. Before dawn: a social drama, tr. by Leonard Bloomfield. Best., 1911. Badger, SI. 50 net. {See also Poet-lore, July-Aug.. 1909, 20: 241-313.) "Depicts the revolting conditions among the suddenly enriched peasants of the Silesian coal districts. . . Alarmist theories of heredity . . . are used to the utmost as the very basis of the tragedy." Pref. to translation. Coming of peace; a family catastrophe; tr. by Janet Achurch and C. E. Wheeler. 125 p. O. Lond., 1900. Duckworth, 3s. 6d. net. "Congenial home life is made impossible through the dis- parity of education and the consequent diversity of interest. The play has little chance on an English stage. It would be called lugubrious. The translation is satisfactory." Reviewed in Academy, Nov., 1900, 59: 460. Elga; tr. from the German by Mary Harned. Bost., 1911. Badger, $1.50 net. (5ee also Poet-lore, 1906, 17: 1-35.) A new version of Grillparzer's tale of "The Kloster of Sendomir" — concerned with the tragedy of an injured hus- band, and for the most part cast in the form of a dream. There are one or two very good dramatic episodes, but Haupt- mann's standard of best work in naturalistic drama is not maintained. Scene from Gerhart Hauptmann's latest plav [Elga]. {See Current Literature. Sept., 1905, 39: 318-22.) Reviewed in .Academy, Mar., 1905, 68: 243; Poet-lore, 1905, 16: 135-6, by P. H. Grumman. — Elga; a play in six scenes; and Pippa dances; a mystical plav- of the glass-works in four acts. Bost., 1909. Badger, S1.25. Fuhrmann Henschel: a play in five acts, tr. by Marion A. Redlich. 152 p. O. Chic. 1910. Dramatic pub. CO., SI. 25. "A study in moral and mental degeneration." Reviewed in Francke. Kuno. German ideals of today. Bost. Houghton, 1907. 21 22 HAUPTMANN Hauptmann, Gerhart. Hannele: a dream poem; tr. from the German bj- William Archer. 195 p. D. Lond., 1894. Published also by Heincmann, Lond. 92 p. S. 2s 6d' also by Doubleday. N.V., 19(JS. Ill p. D. $1 (tr. by C H. MeUerK also by R. H. Badger, Bost., 1911. $1.50 (tr. by G. S. Bryan). (See also Poet-lore, May-June, 1909. 20: 101-91.) Reveals the mind and soul of a wretched little orphan who, just before her death, lapses into a delirium in which she sees in fantastic action all the visions of her unhappy life and her ■■hlmmelfahrt" beyond. By means of a delicate art that feels for simple words, makes the emotions bound, and colors and vivifies all it touches, Hauptmann carries us into this atmosphere of dreamland where Hannele is soaring and makes us see the same visions in realistic shape and plan. This dream poem is his most characteristic work, but has met with no stage success outside of German theatres. Reviewed in Literary world, 1895, 2G: 6; Critic, Feb. 10, 1894, 24: 97, by Arthur Waugh. Lonely lives: a drama; tr. from the German by- Mary Morison. 17 9 p. D. Lond., 1898. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Unmistakably Ibsenian in the very close analogy it bears to Rosmersholm; with the same sets of problematic char- acters battling with the same matters of religion and science, and the same ill-defined bounds of platonic liberty, yet drawn in shapes that are more human, true and appealing. The psychology of the play has little that is convincing. The moral tells us that we cannot lift ourselves ethically above our age. Some critics have claimed for its simple plot the best construc- tion of all modern stage plays. Reviewed in .\thenajum, Apr 6, 1901, 1: 443; Critic, 35: 840; Dial, June 1, 1900, 28: 430, by E. E. Hale. Jr.; Spectator. Sept. 30. 1893. 71: 437. — Reconciliation, a play in three acts, tr. by R. T. House. Bost., 1911. Badger, S1.50. (.See also Poet- lore, Sept.-Oct., 1910, 21: 337-90.) (The) sunken bell, a fairy play in five acts . . . tr. by C. H. Meltzer. 125 p. D. N. Y., 1902. R. H. Russell. Published also by Heinemann. Lond.. 4s net; also (with music by Aime Lachaume) bj^ Double- day, N. Y.. 1908. 180 p. 11. $1; also by R. H. Badger. Bost., 1911. S5 net. A perfect fairy-drama that might delight a child. The same art that in Hannele blended the real with the ideal, the natural with the supernatural, the physical with the spiritual, is here even more highly idealized. Its fancies and images spring from primitive nature, whose woodland elves, sprites and fairies appear in every shape of subtle charm and weirdest mystery. Heinrich, the bell- founder, is a mediaeval mystic, who is striving to satisfy his restless soul with an artistic ideal of real worth and purity. These fairy figures stand for the influences of nature that seek to drag the artist-man down from the heights to the level of his lower instincts. A masterpiece that shows all of Hauptmann's many tendencies in dramatic art, as beautiful to see as it is to read. Reviewed in Francke, Kuno, Glimpses of modern German culture. 1898. p. 85-97; Spectator, Apr., 1900. 84: 602; Dial, June 1, 1900, 28: 430, by E. E. Hale, Jr.; Academy, May, 1900, 58: 448; Athenaeum, Feb. 21, 1903, 121: 252. HAUPTMANN 23 Hauptmann, Gerhart. (The) weavers, a drama of ihtj forties; tr. from the German by Mary Morison. 14« p. D. Lond., 1S99. Heinemann. 2s. 6d. Pub- lished also by Huebsch, N.Y. 1911. SI net. The autfior here takes as his theme the rebellion of the Silesian flax-weavers in 1860. Their hungry eyes, bowed necks and wretched want are pictured with keenest pathos and unrelieved gloom of the sort that makes this play a re- markable judgment of man's cruelty to his fellow-beings. Hauptmann's characteristic failure to work out logically the reformer's ideas that he can set forth dramatically with such brilliant effects is to be deplored. Technically the play lacks continuity of scene, and has no hero or spokesman other than as one exists abstractly in the hunger of the masses. Reviewed in Critic, Sept., 1899, 35: 839; Dial. June 1, 1900, 28: 4.32. by E. E. Hale, Jr.: Spectator, Sept. 30. 1893, 71 : 43G-7. Criticism (Der) arme Heinrich. (See Poet-lore, 16: 145-8.) Brief outline of Hauptmann's play based on Hartmann von .•\lt'e's work of the same name but original in treatment. Barker, Thomas Stockham. Gerhart Hauptmann and his work. (See Critic, Mar., 1S99, 34: 225-31.) An unfavorable review of the only single biography of Hauptmann yet published: "Gerhart Hauptmann, sein Lebens- gang und seine Dichtung," by Paul Schlenther, published in Berlin in 1898. Amounts to a general sketch of Haupt- mann and a criticism of his plays. Coar, J. Firman. Three contemporary German drama- tists. (See Atlantic Mo., Jan., 1898, 81: 71-80.) .A. criticism of Wildenbruch, Sudermann and Hauptmann. The latter is enthusiastically viewed as the artist-poet who wrote the Sunken Bell. Francke, Kuno. Gerhart Hauptmann's Der arme Huinrich. (See his German ideals of today. 1907. p. 282-93.) See also (Der) arme Heinrich above. Gerhart Hauptmann's Michael Kramer. (See his German ideals of today. 1907. p. 275-82.) Gerhart Hauptmann. (See Warner's library of the world's best literature, 17: 7025-40.) A general sketch with an extract from Hannele. Grummann, Paul H. Gerhart Hauptmann's dramas from the Sunken bell to Pippa. (See Poet-lore, July-Aug., 1910, 21: 285-99.) Brief characterizations of Sunken bell. Teamster Henschel, Schluck und Jau, Michael Kramer, Red Cock, Der .Arme Hein- rich, Rosa Bernd, Elga. Recent German criticism comprising Bulthaupt's interpretation of Hauptmann. (See Poet-iore, 1905, 16: 117-26.) . ^ „ , A reply to a criticism of Hauptmann in Heinnch Bult- haupt's "Dramaturgie des Schauspiels", 1902. Guthrie, William Norton. Gerhart Hauptmann. (See Sewanee Rev., May, 1895, 3: 278-89.) A well written appreciation with some sane comparisons of Hauptmann with other dramatists. Hale, Edward Everett, Jr. [Charlemagne's hostage.) (See his Dramatists of to-day. 1905. p. 37-61.) Reviewed also in Current Literature, .\pr.. 1908, 44: 421-2. 24 HAUPTMANN Heller, Otto. Studies in modern German literature: Suderniann. Hauptniann; women writers of the 19th century. 301 p. D. Bost., 1905. Ginn. S1.25. Distinctly popular essays indicating in a way adapted to readers who have little first-hand information, the chief aspects of the work of Hauptmann and Sudermann and some minor women writers. The critic while not great ia always sensible and genuinely interested and interesting. He shows his high estimate of the two great dramatists in an unduly favorable and somewhat too detailed analysis of their plays, arranged in chronological order. Reviewed in Athena?um, Nov. 18, 1905, 2: 685; Poet-lore, Sept., 1905. Iti: 127-S. Henderson, Archibald. Gerhart Hauptmann; social idealist. (See Arena, Mar., 1905, 33: 251-7.) The social reformer as seen in his four greatest plays. Clear and well-outlined. Lee, Elizabeth. German drama of today. {See Living Age, 234: 15G-6G.) A clear indication of the character and tendencies of the modern drama as shown in Hauptmann and Sudermann. Marshall, Beatrice. Gerhart Hauptmann. {See Fort- nightly Rev., Sept., 1901, 76: 459-81.) .\ review and an abstract of Dr. Schlenther's biography of Hauptmann. See also Barker, T. S., Gerhart Hauptmann and his Work. Meyer, Edward Stockton. Modern German drama. {See Critic, July, 1905, 47: 61-70.) Treats of the German naturalistic movement as developed by Hauptmann and Sudermann. Muller, Margarethe. Gerhart Hauptmann. (5ee Atlan- tic Mo., Sept., 1900, 86: .368-77.) Nordau, Max. [Gerhart Hauptmann, his writings thus far.] {See his Degeneration. 1895. p. 523-30, 547.) Shows the author's characteristic intemperance and violence toward the "naturalistic school". Interesting as an adverse opinion rather than valuable as a criticism. Plays of Gerhart Hauptmann. {See Living Age, Sept., 1903, 238: 711-26.) Also published in Quarterly Rev., 191: 317-36. A review of a collection of Hauptmann's German plays, with a brief analysis of each. Puzzle of Gerhart Hauptniann. {See Current Liter- ature, May, 1909, 46: 543-4.) Review and criticism of Hauptmann's Griselda. Steiner, Edward A. Two German dramatists. {See Out- look, Jan. 5, 1901, 67: 74-7.) Based on personal visits to Hauptmann and Sudermann and condensed into a brief analysis of a few stage plays. Stoeckius, Alfred. Naturalism in the recent German drama with special reference to Hauptmann. 36 p. O. Columbia Univ., N. Y., 1903. A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, at Columbia University, containing a valuable bibliography of German titles and a chronological list of Hauptmann's works. Of special interest to students. Witkowski, Georg. Gerhart Hauptmann. {See his German drama of the nineteenth century. 1910. p. 187-202.) Brief sketch of Hauptmann's development as a dramatist with brief analysis of Before sunrise, Friedensfest, Einsame menschen (Lonely lives). Die Weber (the Weavers), Florian Geyer, Hannele, Der Biberpelz, Fuhrmann Henschel, Rosa Bernd, etc. IBSEN Ibsen, Henrik. Works; rev. and ed. by William Archer 11 V. D. N. Y.. 1906-08. Scribner, -SI each. Contents: — V. 1. Feast at Solhaug; Lady Inger of Ostrat; Love's comedy. 2. The Vikings at Helgeland; The pretenders. 3. Brand. 4. Peer Gynt. 5. Emperor and Galilean. 6. League of youth; Pillars of society. 7. Doll's house; Ghosts. 8. Enemy of the people; The wild duck. 9. Rosmersholm; The lady from the sea. 10. Hedda Gabler; The master builder. 11. Little Eyolf; John Gabriel Borkman; When we dead awaken. The recognized definitive collection in English. The intro- duction to each play throws valuable light both on the playg and their author. These introductions taken together form a pretty complete review of Ibsen's life and art. "The vol- umes of this set are sold separately. Separate editions of in- dividual plays are given under the particular titles of the plays. Letters; tr. by J. N. Laurvik and Mary Morison. 456 p. O. N. Y., 1905. Fox. $2.50 net. Included here as containing much interesting matter re- lating to Ibsen's dramas. Reviewed in Bookman, Jan.. 1907. 24: 477; Fortnightly Rev., Mar., 1905, 83: 428-41 ; International Quar., Jan.. 1905, 10: 201- 77; Dial, Dec, 1905. 39: 429-32; Nation, Mar., 1906, 82: 243^. Speeches and new letters; authorized translation by Arne Kildal with an introd. by L. M. Hollander and a bibliographical appendix. O. Bost., 1910. Badger, S.3. Most of the material is here first translated into English. The bibliography is comprehensive and of decided value to students of Ibsen. Brand; a dramatic poem in 5 acts. Published also by Scribner. 288 p. D. $2.50. N. Y., 1894. Tr. in the original metres by C. H. Herford. Shows Ibsen on his highest plane of dramatic work. It is an unsparing scourge of Norway's half-heartedness in its pur- suit of national and Christian ideals. While so intensely national it also has universal application in that it advocates self-realization regardless of the sacrifice involved. The lan- guage and thought are stern and solemn, symbolic and impres- sive. Reviewed in .Arena. Dec, 1890, 3: 81-90, by W. L. Cross; Contcmporarv Rev.. Mar.. 1891. 59: 407-22. by C. H. Her- ford; Fortnightly Rev., .Aug., 1899. 72: 227-.39. bv M. A. Stobart; Dial. .Apr. 10, 1894, lO: 236-40, by W. H. Payne; Atlantic Mo., Dec, 1890, 66: 856. 25 26 IBSEN Ibsen, Henrik. (A) Doll's house. A moral essay calling for more cQuality in marriage. Nora, who furnishes the example of the customary sacrifice of woman's individuality, is one of the most distinctive of Ibsen's char- acters. The plot has evidently been seized for the mere joy of its adaptability for a dramatic picture and for the play it has given the artist in painting each person in his own individ- uality. Considered otherwise there is little excuse for a problem so impossible and for whose evils there is agreed to be little remedy. "In the matter of technique, a Doll's house marks a turn- ing-point in the history of European drama." R. F. Sharp. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., May 15, 1897, 83: 539-41, by G. B. Shaw. Published also separately (tr. by H. L. Menchen) by J. W. Luce. Bost., 190S. 75 c. (A) doll's house; the Wild duck; the Lady from the sea; with an introd. by R. Farquharson Sharp. 300 p. S. N. Y.. 1910. Dutton. 35 c. (Everyman's Library.) (.4) Doll's house and Ihe Wild duck tr. by Sharp; Lady from the sea by Mrs. Marx-.Aveling. Includes list of English trans- lations of Ibsen's dramas. Emperor and Galilean. His largest work, consisting of two five-act epic-dramas, "Caesar's Apostasy " and "Emperor Julian." Boyesen says, "It is looser in construction than any subsequent dramas and is occasionally even a trifle prolix in its discussions. More- over, the wealth of philosophic thought keeps both critics and the public much in the dark as to its real meaning." Enemy of the people. Published also by W. H. Baker, Bost., under title Enemy of society, paper. 25 c. The hero, Dr. Stockholm, simply tells the truth he has discovered in regard to the corruption of some mineral waters that have brought visitors and prosperity to a little town in Norway. "The strongest man is he who stands most alone" is a quotation which reveals Ibsen's opinion that civilization is a detriment to individual character. The drama is clever, powerful and impressive, and has found much favor on the stage. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Apr. 5, 1902, 1 : 444. Feast at Solhaug. A short, historical drama, one of Ibsen's early works. "The theme is fate's disentanglement of a young knight from the net wound round him by the first fancy he has aroused in a woman's heart. . . . The play is young, it affects the senses like youthful, emotional music and youthful experiences must lie behind it." Brandes' "Ibsen," p. 92-3. Ghosts. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost. paper. 25c. Anatole France says, "If the will of those who are no more is to be imposed upon those who still are, it is the dead who live, and the live men who become the dead ones." Such an idea of heredity is the motive of this painfully wrought and intensely revolutionary play. It is significant in the way it preserves the unity of time, concentrating into a single day the culminating point of an action that has been going on for years. Reviewed in Moore, George, Impressions and Opinions, 1891, p. 215-26; Poet-lore, 0: 356; Saturday Rev., July 3, 1897; 84: 12-14, by G. B. Shaw; Athenaeum. Apr. 5, 1902, 1: 444, by N. Hapgood; Nation, Feb. 10, 1887, 44: 116-17. IBSEN 27 Ibsen, Henrik. Hedda Gabler. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost. oOc. Also (tr. by Edmund Gosse) by U. S. Bk. Co., X. Y. 1891. 272 p. D. $1. Amid the wealth of symbolism in this play whose every line has a subtle significance, Ibsen symbolizes his own gloomy style in the action of Hedda when she has the curtain drawn to exclude the sunliRht. It is the sunless side of things that one sees in this as in all his plays. The plot develops with precision and force while the characters pursue their destinies in such wise as might the eyeless fish in a subterranean cavern. Reviewed in VValkley, A. B., Playhouse impressions. 1S92, p. 59-C3; Fortnightly Rev., Jan., 1891. 55: 4-13, by Edmund Gosse; Fortnightly Rev., Mar., 1908, 89: 565-7, by C. Smedley. John Gabriel Borkman. Published also by Stone & Kimball. 198 p. D. N. Y.. 1897. SI. 50. (Green tree library.) Tr. by William Archer. Also by Duffield. N. Y., 1907. $1.50. Mr. Huneker speaks of the simple, logical structure, the unflinching criticism of life and the perfection of the character drawing and dialogue. Reviewed in National Mag., 8: 120; Poet-lore, 9: 302-6; 11: 116; Saturday Rev.. 82: G54. Lady from the sea. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost. paper. 2.5c. Also (tr. by Mrs. E. Marx-Aveling) by E. P. Button. N. Y. 1910. S. 35c. (Everyman's library.) In spite of its obscure symbolism this drama is full of the most poetic fancy. It deals with the old theme that only through law are won the ideals, freedom and happiness, a theme developed in the main by the use of most commonplace and vulgar actualities. "A mi.xture of psychology and poetic fancy surrounding one of Ibsen's haunting principles — that an action is only valu- able and reasonable if it be the spontaneous outcome of the individual will. . . . The theme of the play ... is the psy- chological development of an idle woman who has nothing particular to occupy her life. R. F. Sharp. Reviewed in Walkley. A. B., Playhouse impressions. 1892. p. 59-63; Westminster Rev., July, 1902, 1.5S: 10.5-6. Lady Inger of Ostrat. An historic melodrama with a gloomy castle, spectral pictures and secret passages that make a setting distinctly Maeterlinckian. There are in addition shifting conspiracies, distorted characters and constant mystery. The outworn expedient of much soliloquy to convey information is here used to an excess that we find in a few of his social dramas. An improbable plot but an actable play, produced in 1855. League of youth. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1900. paper. 25 c. under title Young men's league, tr. by Henry Carstarphen. The stinging satire upon democracy interests American readers. Ibsen's feelings, though here they are rarely well moderated, are clearly cast with the figure Bratsberg, who, in league with the past, looks askance upon the struggles and motives of Norway's political parties. The play excels in easy dialogue and the grasp the author has upon the several characters. Little Eyolf. Published also by Stone & Kimball. 164 p. D. Chic, 1894. (Green tree library.) Tr. by William .Archer. .Mso by J. W. Luce. Bost., 1908. 75 c. Tr. by H. L. Menchen. Represents the spectacle of a handful of people all makmg the worst of everything. Ibsen's characteristic use of sug- gestion is here carried to an extreme, but it contributes to the strong atmospheric effect which is the most marked fea- ture of the play. Mystery and the secret ways of fate form 28 IBSEN the aesthetic basis of the theme, and the difficult feat is accom- plished of presenting horror in the sunshine. A loveless mar- riage IS the problem. Reviewed in Stevens, G. \V.. Things Seen; Fortnightly Rev., 63: 277-84. by \V. L. Courtney; Saturday Rev., 1896, ,.T i'i'3- *^-^' by G. B. Shaw; Dial, Jan. 1, 1S95, 18: 5-6, by W. M. Payne; Dublin Rev., Jan., 1895. 120: 112-25, by A. S. Spender. Ibsen, Henrik. Love's comedy. I'ublislurd also by Scribner, N. Y., 1900. $1.40. Tr. by C. H. Ilerford. William Archer and Edmund Gosse. T'if .^'^^'"'^. '* '^''i '" a fashionable pension in the suburbs of Christiania. The theme is a defense of rational marriage as opposed to a marriage of inclination. This first of the fv ^'''^^^ satiric dramas in verse has much lyrical beauty and force, but slight dramatic interest, due to its burden of P"''osophy and the tedious movement. George Brandes and P. H. Wicksteed among critics have each met its puzzles m mterestmg argument. This is a brilliant translation to which IS added a valuable critical estimate. Reviewed in Athenaeum. June 16, 1900, 1: 762-3; Academy, June 23. 1900, 58: 527-8; Fortnightly Rev., Feb., 1900. 73: 191-9. by C. H. Herford; Fortnightly Rev., Jan., 1873, 19: <'-88, by Edmund Gosse. (The) master builder; a play in three acts. Published also by Heincmann (new ed.) 250 p. D. Lond., 1893. 2s. 6d. Tr. by E. W. Gosse and William Archer. Also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 50c. Brandes writes, "This is a play that echoes and re-echoes m our mmds long after we have read it. . . . Great is its art, profound and rich is its symbolic language. . . . Ibsen's in- tention is to give us by means of real characters, but in half- allegoncal form, the tragedy of a great ambitious artist whose ideals can never be realized even though he is successful." Reviewed in Arena. Feb., 1908, 39: 160-5, by M. Mailly; Poet-lore, 1902, 12: 95; Saturday Rev., Mar. 4, 1893, 75: 241; Spectator, Mar. 4, 1893, 70: 285. Peer Gynt. A masterpiece of poetic drama; a piece of world-literature into whose lines one can read new and ever new meanings, and even his own meanings that please him best. The typical Norseman is satirized in the hero, a man of dreams and idle in action; a cynically indifferent, selfish ne er-do-weel, who, like Brand, pursues a motto "to be him- self," but does it in contrast by giving Self its wildest satis- faction. The heroine, Solveig, drawn in perfect antithesis to the hero, is most appealing. Prominent critics disagree as to whether the ethical problem has or has not been solved in the romantic ending. Peer Gynt's own lively wit and imagination add charm and distinct vitality. Reviewed in Couch, A. T. Quiller-, Adventures in Criti- cism. 1896, p. 283-96; Saturday Rev.. Sept. 19, 1S96, 82: 321; Contemporary Rev., 56: 274, by P. H. Wicksteed; Book- man, 3: 535. Poet-lore. 1907, 18: 383-92, by Jane D. Stone. Pillars of society. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost. paper. 25c. -An attack upon the hypocrisy and snobbishness of Consul Bernick, local magnate of a provincial Norwegian town. He may be said to typify the merchant-class supporters of a comrnunity, who are lined up like whited sepulchres. "The plot is sirnple and the art grim, yet there is dramatic interest in the swift action, biting sarcasm and skilful grouping of mcidents. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., May 18, 1901, 91: 631, by M. Beerbohm. IBSEN 29 Ibsen, Henrik. The Pretenders. The theme is the struggle for the vacant throne of Sverre in the romantic epoch of the thirteenth century in Xorwegian history. Boyesen calls it "highly impressive as an acting drama; written with true dramatic instinct which concentrates the action and dispenses with all superfluous dialogue. It shows Ibsen's familiarity with the stage both as stage manager and artistic director." Rosmersholm. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost. paper. 25c. Tr. by M. Carmichael. Several characters of the savage, free, northern type dreamily aspire to moral liberty. The subtle psychology of the problem enshrouds the reader with perplexity. So slight are the inci- dents and details and so bare the chance of an actor's right interpretation of such strangely real and unreal people that the drama may well be reserved for mere closet reading. Reviewed in Walkely, .^. B., Playhouse impressions. 1892. p. 53-8; Nation, Mar. 12, 1891,52: 216-17. by E. R. Pennell; Saturday Rev., Feb. 28, 1891, 71: 258. Vikings at Helgeland. The character of the author's earlier work is to be noted in. this saga-like drama. Romance, blood, fate and tragic pathos move its legendary though life-like characters. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Apr. 25, 1903. 121: 539-40. When we dead awaken; a dramatic epilogue in 3 acts. Published also by Stone & Kimball. 157 p. D. Chic, 1900. (Green tree library.) Tr. by William Archer. This last of Ibsen's great prose dramas has a familiar motive closely related to the artist's career in The Master Builder "Life without love, even the most artistic, is to be counted as death," and about the sculptor Rubek is drawn a drastic pic- ture of the kind of death that life without love assuredly is. A play of engaging interest and masterly work. Better for reading than for acting. Reviewed in Fortnightly Rev.. Apr., 1900, 73: 575-90, by J. A. Joyce; Academy, Apr. 14, 1900, 58: 307-8; Nation, Feb. 1. 1900.70:94, by W. M. Payne; Athenaeum, Apr. 7. 1900, 1:442; Poet-lore, May-June, 1909. 20: 201-17. by T. B. Thompson. (The) wild duck. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost. paper. 25c. Tr. by E. M. Aveling. Also (tr. by R. F. Sharp) by E. P. Dutton. N. Y., 1910. 35c. (Everyman's library.) This wild drake kept in a garret in a tamed state is the image of a man born to liberty, but condemned by accidents of civilization and the acquired weakness of his nature to live in servitude and darkness. Considered dramatically there is masterly character drawing, but an unhappy mixture of satire and tragedy as well as a lack of skill in effecting cli- maxes. "In technical skill the play is his masterpiece; indeed, it would be difficult to name any modern drama that is its superior in construction, characterization, and absolute naturalness and aptness of dialogue. . . . The only weak point in the play lies in the 'symbolism' of the Wild Duck itself." R. F. Sharp. Criticism Archer, William. From Ibsen's workshop; the genesis of his dramas. {See F"ortnightIv Rev., Dec. 1909. 92: 976-92. Same in Forum. Dec.', 1909. 42: 506-22.) Ibsen and English criticism. {See Fortnightly Rev., July. 1889, 52: 30-7.) Ibsen's notable translator here discusses whether or not his plays will ever find a permanent place on the English stage. 30 IBSEN Archer, William. (The) real Ibsen. {See International Ml... Feb.. 1901, 3: 1S2-201.) A biographical sketch of real value, with incidental com- ments on the beauty of Ibsen's verse in the original tongue. Bjorkman, E. Ibsen as he should be read. N. Y.. 1907. Motiatt. sl.20. Boyesen, Hjalmar Hjorth. (A) Commentary on the works of Henrik Ibsen. 317 p. D. Lond., 1894. Heine- mann, 7s. 6d. net. This distinguished Scandinavian critic has compressed in a notable introduction and several chapters the pith of Ibsen's social ideas. His analysis is chiefly distinguished by a happy mixture of quick perception, generous appreciation and good common sense. The style is easy and vivid, but shows evi- dence of hurried construction and examples of poor trans- lation. Reviewed in Dial, Apr., 1894, 16: 236, by W. M. Payne; Academy, .Apr.. 1894, 286; Spectator, May, 1894, 72: 652; Saturday Rev., 78: 3.J9; Critic. 2,"): 119. Brandes, Georg Moritz Cohen. Henrik Ibsen. {See his Eminent authors of the 19th century. 1886; p. 405-60.) "A masterful analysis, worth everything else that has been written in English concerning Ibsen." Nation. Brandes is a profound admirer of Ibsen as well as an ardent advocate of the modern spirit for which Ibsen stands. Henrik Ibsen; Bjornstjerne Bjornson; critical studies. 171 p. O. N. Y., 1899. Macmillan, $2.25. Reviewed in .'Academy, July, 1899, 57: 79-80; .'Kthenaeum, Aug., 1899, 2: 202; Spectator, July, 1899, 83: 25; Nation, 69: 340; Dial, Nov., 1899, 27: 314, by W. M. Payne. Brochner, Jessie. Henrik Ibsen. {See Bookman, Oct., 1903, 18: 180-9.) Presents the personal side of Ibsen. Of value for its 5 or 6 illustrations. Butler, A. Maynard. View of Ibsen. {See Contem- porary Rev., May, 1902, 81: 709-19.) Attempts to define Ibsen's present status and gives brief comments on each play. Crawfurd, Os'wald. The Ibsen question. {See Fort- nighty Rev., May, 1891, 55: 723-40.) The question is popularly covered, giving the Ibsen point of view, a sketch of his life and short ethical interpretations of the plays. Ellis, Havelock. Ibsen. {See his The new spirit. Ed. 3. 1892. p. 133-73.) Ender, A. von. Henrik Ibsen and the women of his dramas. {See Theatre, Aug., 1909, 10: 48-54, new ser.) Discusses the dramatic rather than the literary significance of several of Ibsen's chief creations. Evans, Edward Payson. Henrik Ibsen; his early career as poet and plavwright. {See Atlantic Mo., May, 1890, 65: 577-88.) Garland, Hamlin. Ibsen as a dramatist. {See Arena, June, 1890, 2: 72-82.) Influence of Ibsen. (5ee his Crumbling idols. 1894. p. 99.) "In 12 essays, full of sound, inspiring thought, Mr. Gar- land shows himself a clear-sighted critic and a hopeful prophet." Reviewed in Dial. July 1, 1894, 17: 11, by E. E. Hale, Jr.; Nation, July 19, 1894, 59: 53; Critic. Sept. 15, 1894, 25: 169. IBSEN 31 Gosse, Edmund William. Henrik Ibsen. (See his Studies in the literature of northern Europe. 1883. p. .35-69.) Enlargement of an article printed in the Fortnightly Rev.. Jan., 1873. 19: 74-88. Published also in his ••Northern Studies." 1890. p. 38-104. ^ Henrik Ibsen. N. Y., 1908. D. Scribner, SI. ••A biography which sketches the influences . . . that set the great poet to weaving such an individual life tapestry. . . . There is no attempt to set forth the plots of his dramas, nor to treat the spurious 'lessons' and suppositious 'problems' which so many look for in Ibsen." Book Review Digest. Reviewed in .Athenaeum, Mar. 2, 1908, 1: 304; Atlantic Mo., Aug.. 1908, 102: 260; Dial. Feb. 16, 1908, 44: 108; Independent. Apr. 23, 1908,64:921; Nation, Mar. 5, 1908,86:222; Putnam's, May. 1908, 4: 238; Saturday Rev., Mar. 14, 1908, 105: 330-1. • Ibsen's social dramas. (See Fortnightly Rev., Jan. 1889, 51: 107-21.) An e.xcellent, discriminating critique. Lighter in treat- ment than Brandes. Hapgood, Norman. Ibsen. (See his Stage in America, 1897-1900. 1901. p. 206-18.) Thoughtful interpretation of Ibsen's dramas as produced on the .\merican stage. Henderson, Archibald. Henrik Ibsen and social prog- ress. (See Arena, Jan.. 1905, 3.3: 26-30.) Herrmann, Oscar. Living dramatists: Pinero, Ibsen, D'Annunzio; introduction bv Will W. Massee. 187 p. O. N. v.. 1905. Brentano, 'S5 net. Huneker, James. Ibsen. (See his Egoists. 1908. p. 317-49.) Appreciative but sane general sketch of Ibsen's dramatic work. Ibsen and his translators. (See Nation, Jan. 23. 1890, 50: 67-8.) The Nation considers that most of the notices of transla- tions of Ibsen that have appeared in American journals up to 1890 are ignorant and valueless plagiarisms of English reviews. Jaeger, Henrik Bernhard. Henrik Ibsen, a critical biography [tr.] from the Norwegian by VV. M. Payne. Ed. 2. 320 p. il. O. Chic, 1901. McClurg. §1.50 net. Ibsen's literary works strung in the order of their appear- ance upon the thread of his personal career. Chiefly valu- able for the account of his early life. Reviewed in Dial, June 1, 1902, 32: 16-17. by W.H.Carruth. James, Henry. Henrik Ibsen. (See his Essays in Lon- don and elsewhere. 1893. p. 230-52.) This essay is distinguished by the subtle observations, delicate, critical shadings and clever style so characteristic of Mr. James. In the few pages on Ibsen, the author con- siders only Ibsen's successes as a dramatist and ignores the prevalent question of his "morality and immorality." Reviewed in .\thenaeum, July 29, 1893, 2: 158; Nation. Nov. ,30, 1893, 57: 416. Knorr, Helena. Ibsen and the ethical drama of the nineteenth century. (See Poet-lore, Jan. -Mar., 1898. 10: 49-65.) Traces the evolutions of the ethical drama through its earlier representatives: Dumas, .Angler and Ibsen, with Ibsen as its master. 32 IBSEN Lee, Jannette Barbour. Ibsen secret; a key to the prosL- diaiuarf of Henri k Ibsen. N. Y., 1908. D. Put- nam, SI. 25. Devoted principally to the symbolism in Ibsen's dramas. Enthusiastic and emotional rather than discriminating or analytic. Reviewed in .Atlantic Mo.. Aug., 1908, 102: 259; Independent, Apr. 2a, 1008, 04: 922; Nation, Nov. 28, 1907, 85: .500. Lord, Walter Frewen. Works of Henrik Ibsen. {See Xinetoi-iuh century, Aug., 1S89, 26: 241-56.) A faint outline of the plays, considered in chronological order. Macfall, Haldane. Ibsen, the man, his art and his significance. X. V., 1907. D. Morgan Shepard Co., $1.50. Considerable attention paid to the plots. The material seems chiefly drawn from other biographers. Impressionistic and rhetorical in tone. Reviewed in Dial, Feb. 16, 1907,42: 110; Putnam's, Apr., 1907, 2: 120. Matthews, Brander. Ibsen the playwright. {See Book- man, Feb., 19(16, 22: 568-75; Mar., 1906. 23: 18-27.) See also his Inquiries and opinions. 1907. p. 229-79. An interesting summary with especial attention given to the stage success of the plays. Monkhouse, Allan. Ibsen's social plays. (5ee his Books and plays. 1894. p. 155-85.) Reviewed in Spectator, Aug., 1S94, 73: 242-3; Literary world, Sept. S, 1894, 25: 282; Academy, Oct., 1894, 46: 252. Moses, Montrose J. Henrik Ibsen; the man and his plays. N. Y., 1908. 525 p. D. Kennerley, .$1.50. "The groundwork has been based on Mr. William Archer's definitive English edition of Ibsen's dramas." Preface. Includes a bibliographical note (p. 517-22). Reviewed in Dial. Mar. 16, 1909; 46: 192; Independent, June 24, 1909, 00: 1400; Nation, Dec. 17, 1908; 87: 609; North American Rev.. Apr., 1909. 189; 621-3; Outlook, Mar. 3, 1909. 91: 773. Nordau, Max. Ibsenism. (See his Degeneration. Ed. 5. 1895. p. 338-415.) Nordau has undertaken to prove in a scientific and elabo- rate argument that a large percentage of society has de- veloped a taste for the inferior in art and music and the depraved and filthy in literature, and that authors . . . who furnish the supply are morally and mentally degen- erate." Critic. » Original, violent in language and "as brilliant as it is pig- headed." Reviewed in North American Rev., June, 1895, 160: 735-40. by Kenyon Cox; Bookman, 1: 178; Saturday Rev., Mar. 9, 1895, 79: 323; Dial, Apr. 10, 1895, 18: 230, by E. E. Hale, Jr.; Nation, 00: 327. Payne, William Morton. Henrik Ibsen. (5ee Outlook, May 21, 1902, 71: 240-7.) Rose, Henry. Ibsen as a religious teacher. {See Contem- porary Rev., June, 1908, 93: 692-708.) Traces Swedenborgian and other religious elements in Peer Gynt and Brand. Schofield, William Henry. Personal impressions of Bjornson and Ibsen. {See Atlantic Mo., Apr., 1898, 81: 567-73.) A study of Ibsen in contrast with his great contemporary, Bjornson, by a great philologist who has studied in Christ- iania. IBSEN 33 Shaw, George Bernard. Quintessence of Ibsenism. Ed. 2. 170 p. D. N. Y.. 1891. Brentano. Sl.OO. A thesis written to meet the misapprehension of Ibsen's works by the members of the Fabian Society of London, who considered it worse than eccentric to commend him. It treats of Ibsen's moral doctrine rather than of his art or literary development. It is defiant toward conventional morality, cynical and paradoxical, but stimulates one's desire to read more deeply into Ibsen's philosophy. Reviewed in Nation, Oct. G, 1904, 7'J: 282. Simons, L. Ibsen as an artist. {See Westminster Rev., Nov., 1893. 140: 506-13.) Art criticism applied to The Master builder. Lady from the sea and Rostnersholm. Smedley, C. In defence of Hedda Gabler. (5ee Fort- nightly Rev., Mar.. 1908, 89: 565-7.) Smith, L. W. Ibsen, Emerson and Nietsche, the indi- vidualists. {See Popular Science Mo.. Feb., 1911, 78: 147-57.) Treats the philosophy of Ibsen rather than his dramatic skill. Stampenbourg, Baron de. (The) passing of Ibsen. (.SV.; Independent, Nov. 7, 1901. 53: 2630-3.) Wicksteed, Philip H. Four lectures on Henrik Ibsen dealing chiefly with his metrical works. Ed. 2. 112 p. S. Lond., 1892. Sonnenschein. 2s. 6d. Valuable lectures, including some representative selec- tions from Ibsen's works. Winter, William. (The) Ibsen drama. {See his Shadows (,{ the stage. Series 3. 1895. p. 330-7.) Mr. Winter accords scant praise to Ibsen as a dramatist. "His plays have too little action to qualify them for the stage — are too commonplace and insipid to take rank as litera- ture." HENRY ARTHUR JONES Jones, Henry Arthur. Bed of roses; a comedy in one act. 22 p. D. Lond. and N. Y. S. French, paper. 6d. See also French's (late Lacy's) Acting ed. of plays. Lond. V. 119. One of his earliest comedies. "An irascible father having turned his son out of doors three years previously, forbids his daughter to marry his medical attendant. The son returns, and the father relents when he learns that the medical attend- ant has been the means of saving his son's life in the Cape War." Hogg. Breaking a butterfly; a play in three acts. 76 p. O. Lond., 1884. Privately printed, o. p. "An adaptation for English playgoers of Ibsen's 'Doll's House,' falsifying the ethical import and distorting the motive of the husband." Wm. Archer. Reviewed in Archer, Wm., About the theatre, 1886. p. 48. Carnac Sahib; an original play in four acts. 151 p. D. Lond. Macmillan. 2s. 6d. "Distinguished by fidelity of portraiture, command of dialogue and splendor of presentation, but there is no genuine interest in the characters and sympathy, though not entirely lacking, is badly distributed. Undramatic picture of Anglo- Indian life." Athenceum. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Apr. 22, 1899, 1: 507; Oct. 28, 1899, 2: 595. Case of rebellious Susan: a comedy in three acts. 156 p. D. Lond. and N. Y. S. French, 75c. Published also by Macmillan. Lond., 1901. 128 p. D. 2s. 6d. The revolt of a spirited wife against modern social conditions. The play as a whole is one of the author's cleverest and most convincing dramas. Reviewed in Athenaeum, July 17, 1897, 2: 107; Illustrated London News, June 18, 1910, 136: 994; Sept. 24, 1910, 137: 450. (A) clerical error; a comedy in one act. 24 p. D. N. Y. French, cl906. paper. 25c. In Jones' early manner (first produced in 1879). A clergy- man, misunderstanding a note written by his ward, nearly marries her himself instead of marrying her to the man really meant in her note. Slight, but pleasant. (The) Crusaders; an original comedy of modern London life. 130 p. D. Lond., 1905. Macmillan, 2s. 6d. A satire on the motives and methods of modern reformers. (The) dancing girl; a drama in four acts. 119 p. D. N. Y.. 1909. S. French, 75c. A study in degenerate English society. "Almost a really great play. The characters are typical studies from life." The dramatic technique is excellent. Reviewed by Walklev, A. B., Playhouse impressions. 1892. p. 130-4; Illustrated London News, Feb. 20, 1909, 134: 354; Saturday Rev., Jan. 24, 1891, 71: 99; Theatre, 1891, 26: 98-9; Mar., 1892, 28: 121. 34 JONES 35 Jones, Henry Arthur. (The) deacon; a comedy sketch in two acts. 23 p. D. Lond. S. French, paper. 6d. (See also French's (late Lacy's) Acting ed. of plays. V. 133.) A satire on unreasonable and bigoted opposition to the stage. The violence and improbability of the characters rather defeat the purpose of the play. Reviewed in Theatre, 1890, 25: 185-6. Dolly reforming herself; a comedy in four acts. N. Y., 1910. S. French, 75c. "Founded on a philosophic question 'Can we cure ourselves of our bad habits?' and the answer worked out by the behavior of a few people in a country house." Beerbohm. Reviewed in Illustrated London News, Feb. 6, 1909, 134: 182; Saturday Rev., Nov. 7, 1908, 100: 573, by Max Beer- bohm. Elopement; a comedy in two acts. Lond. and New York. S. French, paper. 6d. (See also French's (late Lacy's) .\cting ed. of plays, v. 122.) A slight play of the 1879 group. The plot centres around an intended elopement which finally ends happily for all. Harmony; a domestic drama in one act. 18 p. D, Lond. and New York, 1889. S. F'rench. paper. 6d. (.S^e also French's (late Lacy's) Acting ed. of plays, v. 119.) A brief sketch of the lower middle classes, a now practically forgotten play seldom if ever rising above the commonplace. Hearts of oak; a domestic drama in two acts. D. Lond. and New York., 1885. S. French, paper. 6d. (See also French's (Lacy's) Acting ed. of plays, v. 122.) Once very popular as a stage production. \ conventional drama with a prodigal hero, an elderly villain and a much- loved heroine of the types beloved by the gallery god. (The) hypocrites; a play in four acts. 118 p. O- New York, 1908. S. F'rench, 75c. "A victory which accomplishes itself. The hero is a young curate who holds fast to the higher ideal of the Church of Eng- land against all the hypocrites about him and by virtue of his single truth enforces one law for both the low-born and nobly- born transgressor in the common sin of seduction." W. D. Hcnvells. Reviewed in Current Literature, Feb., 1907, 42: 189-95; Harper's Weekly, Nov. 24, 1906, 50: 1682-3, by VV. D. Howells; Theatre, Oct., 1906, 6: 255-9. Joseph entangled; a comedy in three acts. 141 p. O. N. Y.. 1909. S. French, 7oc. "A realistic comedy of manners, full of vitality and distin- guished by its naturalness of dialogue. The play is spent in frantic efforts to e.xplain certain compromising circumstances." M. Beerbohm. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., Jan. 23, 1904,97: 107, by Max Beerbohm. Judah; an original play in three acts. 107 p. O Lond., 1S94. Macmillan, 2s. 6d. A non-conformist minister perjures himself to s;ive the repu- tation of a faith-healer and medium whom he loves and with whom he afterward works out their common rehabilitation in the eyes of the world. The play, which is one of Jones' strong- est, is a study of the moral degeneration and regeneration wrought by love. Reviewed by Walkley, A. B., Playhouse impressions, 1892. p. 119-22; Academy, 37: 396, by F. Wedmore; Saturday Rev., May 24, 1890, 69: 640; Theatre, 1890, 25: 24; 1892. 28: 152. 36 JONES Jonea, Henry Arthur. (The) lackey's carnival; a comedy in lour acts. O. Lond., 1900. Privately printed. "First effort of a dramatist to penetrate the character of servants, but the play should have been more wholly devoted to the main idea. The hero, stripped of circumstantial un- reality, is a fine and memorable character." Max Beerbohm. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Oct. 6, 1900, 2: 451; Saturday Rev., Oct. 6. 1900, 90: 423, by Max Beerbohm. (The) liars; an original comedy in four acts. 160 p. O. N. v., 1909. S. French. 75c. Published also by Macmillan. Lond., 1904. 130 p. D. 2s. 6d. "The subject is a married lady sailing too close to the wind in a flirtation. The interest apart from its wealth of comedy lies in the keen and accurate picture of smart society." G. B. Shaw. Reviewed in Academy, Oct. 16, 1897, .52: 306; Athcna?um, Oct. 16, 1897, 2: 533; Jan. 4, 1902, 1: 28; Bookman, Nov. 1, 1898, 8: 210; Critic, Nov., 1898, 30: 371-3; Forum, Feb., 1899. 26: 7.57, by J. G. Speed; Harper's Weeklv, Oct. 8, 1898, 42: 994; Saturday Rev., Oct. 9, 1897, 84: 388, by G. B. Shaw; Dec. 10, 1910, 110: 778. Manoeuvres of Jane; an original comedy in four acts. 12S p. D. Lond., 1905. Macmillan, 2s. 6d. .'\ farcical study of the manner in which a disobedient daughter man(euvres so as to thwart the plans of everybody but herself and to marry the man of her choice. One of Jones' best farce-comedies. Reviewed in Academy, Nov. 5, 1898, 55: 216; Athenaeum, Nov. 5. 1898, 2: 651; Harper's Weekly, Dec. 23, 1899, 43: 1293, by John Corbin; Independent, Apr. 6, 1905, 58: 783; Saturday Rev., Nov. 5, 1898, 86: 60.3-05, by Max Beerbohm. (The) masqueraders; a play in four acts. 124 p. D. Lond., 1899. Macmillan, 2s. 6d. Published also by S. French. N. Y., 1909. 135 p. O. 75c. "Dramatic and interesting, but inconclusive and incomplete, suggesting views as to the significance of feminine surrender which the writer does not hold." Athencsiim. Reviewed in Athenaeum, July 15. 1899, 2: 108. Michael and his lost angel; a play in five acts. 131 p. D. Lond., 1905. Macmillan. 2s. 6d. "If sympathetically considered from the author's attitude, this seems a genuinely sincere and moving play written with knowledge as to the man and insight as to the woman by an adept playwright with a kindly observer's sense of contempo- rary manners and a knowledge of spiritual history." G. B. Shaw. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Apr. 17, 1897, 1: 519; Dial, Sept. 16. 1896, 21: 149; Saturday Rev., Jan. 18, 1896; 81: 70-1; Jan. 25, 1896, 81: 98-100. (The) middleman; a play in four acts. 128 p. O. N. Y. S. French, 75c. "A piece of frank romance, the dramatic significance of which lies in the situation of a father who will not permit his son to marrv the woman whom he, the son, has dishonored." A. B. Walkley. Reviewed by Walkley, A. B., Playhouse impressions, 1892, p. 116-18; Arena, Mar., 1901, 25: 329-39; Theatre. 1889, 23: 200. Mrs. Dane's defense; a play in four acts. 136 p. O- N. Y., 1909. S. French, 75c. Published also by Macmillan. Ix)nd., 1905. 131 p. D. 2s. 6d. Deals with the unsuccessful attempt of a woman to conceal a dishonorable past. A study in the inevitable punishment which awaits a lapse from feminine virtue. Excellent in stage construction and character drawing. JONES 37 Reviewed in Athenaeum, Oct. 13, 1900, 2: 487; Critic Feb 190J, 38: 139, by J. R. Towse; Fortnightly Rev., Nov., 1900. 74: 8')3-5; North .American Rev., Mar., 1901, 172: 478-9- Outlook. .A.pr. L"J, 1905, 79; 10(iO. Jones, Henry Arthur. (An) old master; a comedy in one act. 22 p. D. Lond., 1«83. S. French, 6d. (5ee also French's (late Lacy's) Acting ed. of plays, v. 119.) Of interest only as an example of Jones' early manner. Of no literary merit and not very successful as a stage produc- tion. (The) physician; an original play in four acts. 119 p. D. Lond.. 1899. Macmillan. 2s. 6d. A morbid study of hypochondria and a physician's struggle to decide between love and professional duty. Reviewed in Critic, Oct. 9, 1897; 28: 209; Harper's Weekly, Oct. 16, 1897, 41 : 1020, by J. D. Barry; Saturday Rev.. Apr. 3. 1897, 83: 348-50. by G. B. Shaw. (The) rogue's comedy; a play in three acts. 140 p. D. Lond., 1898. Macmillan, 2s. 6d. A study of the English underworld. Full of humor but often drops to level of mediocre melodrama. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Jan. 28, 1899, 1:121; Critic, Dec. 12. 189G, 26: 393; Dial, Apr. 16, 1899,26: 279; Saturday Rev.. Jan. 25, 1896, 81: 98-100; Apr. 25, 1896, 81: 426. Saints and sinners; a new and original drama of modern English middle-class life in five acts. IGcS p. O. Lond., 1881. Macmillan, 3s. 6d. "Ruthless handling of hypocrisy and selfishness under a cloak of religion. The truth of character, literary ability of dialogue and dramatic skill of construction are unques- tioned." Nation. Reviewed in Archer, Wm., About the theatre, 1886. p. 49; Nation, Oct. 30. 1884. 39: 371, by Henry Norman; Theatre. 1892, 28: 151. Silver king; a drama in five acts. 179 p. O. X. Y., 1907. S. French, 75c. A melodrama with a long record of stage success. The hero ruined by association with blacklegs and gamblers, flees to America under suspicion of murder. He goes to Montana becomes a "silver king," and returns to track down the real murderer and to free himself from suspicion. As a literary production it is of little significance. Reviewed in Archer, William, About the theatre, 1886, p. 47; Theatre, 1882. Sweet Will; a comedy in one act. 24 p. D. N. Y., 1893. S. French, paper. 15c. (See also French's (late Lacy's) Acting ed. of plays, v. 131.) A quiet pastoral play in which the course of true love though hindered by poverty finally does "run smooth." (The) tempter; a tragedy in verse in four acts. 130 p. S. Lond., 1898. Macmillan, 2s. 6d. A miracle play with mediaeval setting. Powerful and stimu- lating, but neither great poetry nor great drama. The author's only poetical drama. Reviewed in .Athenaeum, Dec. 31, 1898, 2: 940; Westminster Mag., Jan., 1899, 151: 107. Triumph of the Philistines and how Mr. Jordan preserved the morals of Market Pewbury under very trying circumstances; a comedy in three acts. 137 p. D. Lond. and N. Y., 1899. Macmillan. 2s. 6d. "An object lesson in British lower middle-class hypocrisy, which is attacked courageously and uncompromisingly . . . Shows creative imagination, curious observation and inven- tive humor which combine to produce a right effect even though details are outrageous." G. B.'Shaw. 38 JONES Reviewed in Saturday Rev.. May 18, 1895, 79: 650. by G. B. Shaw. Jones, Henry Arthur. Whitewashing JuUa; an origi- nal coinedv in tliree acts and an epilogue. 140 p. D. Lond., i;)U5. Macmillan, 2s. Gd. Julia, returning to her native town, is forced, in order to escape social ostracism, to explain satisfactorily her relations to a married foreign prince. The outcome is satisfactory and Julia is "white washed." An attack on country bigotry and moral pretense. Reviewed in Athenaeum. Mar. 7, 1903. 1: 315; Saturday Rev., May 17. 1903, 95: 291, by Max Beerbohm. Non-Dramatic Works (Selected) Jones, Henry Arthur. Appeal to churchmen to save tiie drama. {See Current Literature. Dec. 1906. 41: 680-1.) Points out the moral possibilities of clean, courageous drama. Bible on the stage. (See New review, Feb.. 1893.) Censorship muddle. 60 p. O. Lond., 1909. S. French, 6d. Corner-stones of modern drama. (See Fortnightly Rev., Dec, 1906, 86: 1084-94.) Literature and the modern drama. (See Atlantic Mo., Dec, 1906, 98: 796-807.) Recognition of the drama by the state. (See Nine- teenth Cent., Mar., 1904, 55: 449-66.) Discusses the question of an endowed National theatre. Renascence of the English drama; essays, lectures and fragments relating to the modern English stage, written and delivered in the years 1883-94. D. Lond., 1895. Macmillan, 6s. Though without logical connection or definite plan these articles not only reveal much of Jones' purposes and methods in playwriting but afford much suggestive material for the general criticism of contemporary dramatists. Criticism Archer, William. [Henry Arthur Jones.] (See his About the theatre, 1886, p. 45-6.) Beerbohm, Maz. Popular success of Henry Arthur Jones. (See Saturday Rev., Oct. 13, 1900, 90: 458.) Bettany, A. L. Henry Arthur Jones and modern Eng- lish drama. (See Theatre, 31: 203.) Blathwayt, R. Henry Arthur Jones. (See Idler 4: 67.) Slight, popular sketch of Jones and his work. Borsa, Mario. English stage of to-day. 190S. Includes general critique of Jones with brief comments on several plays. Bullock, J. M. Henry Arthur Jones with bibliography of his plays. (See Bookbuyer, Apr., 1898, 16: 225.) Biographical and critical with concise comments on many individual plays. Bibliography is confined to list of titles with year of first production. Hamilton, J. A. Henry Arthur Jones. (See Munsey, May, 1894, 11: 174.) Howells, William Dean. Plays of Henry Arthur Jones. (See North American Rev.. Oct.. 1907, 186: 205-12.) An appreciative sketch with brief analysis of several later plays. JONES 39 Jones, Henry Arthur. Chance the idol. 1902. The hero is a man of good intentions but no will-power who, by yielding to his love for gambling, is financially ruined and unable to make reparation to the woman he has wronged. A study in feebleness of moral fibre. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., Sept. 13, 1902. 94: 328. by Max Beerbohm. Chevaleer. 1904. .\n itinerant showman, the "Chevaleer" takes advantage of an apparently compromising position in which he discovers a lady and her admirer to secure for himself a lucrative com- mission. Broadly farcical, it derives its humor from the meeting of diverse strata of society and the resulting situa- tions. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., Sept. 10, 1904, 98: 328, by Max Beerbohm. (The) evangelist. A study of non-conformist religious ideals and motives. Produced at the Knickerbocker, N. Y.. Nov., 1907. Reviewed in Forum, Jan., 1908, 39: 370-1. Hoodman blind. 1885. A piece of apprentice work. Reviewed in Archer, William, About the theatre, 1886, p. 54. (The) knife. 1910. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., Jan. 1, 1910, 108: 11, by Max Beerbohm. Lord Harry. 1886. Comment by \Vm. Archer in his About the theatre. 1886. p. 55. Noble vagabond. 1886. Reviewed in Theatre, 1886. 18: 44, 107. Princess' nose. 1902. "A young wife is neglected by her husband who plans to elope with a married woman who is a guest in the house." A fortunate accident opens the husband's eyes and brings things to a happy conclusion. Strong in spots but not an adequate solution of married fickleness nor a powerful play. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., Mar. 22, 1902, 93: 363. We can't be as bad as all that. 1911. Characteristic study of the weaknesses of certain English social types whose acquaintance in real life would be highly undesirable. Neither a great success nor a marked failure either in style or construction. Reviewed in Canadian Mag., Mar., 1911, 36: 476-8; Book- man, Feb.. 1911, 23: 607; Munsey's Mag., Feb., 1911, 44: 710. Wealth. 1889. Reviewed in Theatre, 1889. 22: 326. ;■ and Herman, Henry. Chatterton. 1884. "Thoughtful and original. Makes no attempt to reproduce or interpret the idiosyncrasies of the historical Chatterton, but presents an accepted type of genius at war with poverty." Wm. Archer. Comment by Wm. .\rcher in his About the theatre. 1886. p. 48. Moses, Montrose J. Henry Arthur Jones: dramatist. (See Book News, Apr.. 190S, 26: 437-9.) Popular illustrated sketch of no marked value. Recent English dramatists. O. Phil., 1901. Booklovers' library, o. p. Includes criticism of Jones. 40 JONES Tarpey, W. K. Henrv Arthur Jones' work as a dramatist. (Sre Critic, Aug., 1900, 37: 12.3, 124-8.) Walkley, Arthur Bingham. Henry Arthur Jones on plavmakiiig. {See his Playhouse impressions. 1892. p. 111-15.) Criticism of an address of Jones and incidentally of his theory of the drama. The realist in spite of himself. {See his Playhouse impressions. 1S92. p. 123-9.) Demonstration of Jones' essential realism in his best work. MAETERLINCK Maeterlinck, Maurice. Plays; tr. by Richard Hovey. 2 V. D. Chic, 1896-1902. Stone & Kimball, $1.25 ea. (Green tree library.) Contents: — V. 1. Princess Maleine. The intruder. The blind. The seven princesses. V. 2. AUadine and Palomides. P^llfes and M^lisande. Home. The death of Tintagiles. Reviewed in Critic, 26: 379; Literary World, 26: 68. Three plays by Maeterlinck: Alladine and Palo- mides, Interior, The death of Tintagiles. Lond. Gowans & Gray. O 2s. 6d. Translated by William Archer and Alfred Sutro. A|jlavaine and Selysette; a drama in five acts, tr. by Alfred Sutro. 172 p. O. Lond., 1897. Richards, 3s. 6d. net. Published also by G. Allen. 110 p. O. Lond.. 1904. 3s. 6d. net. (Acting version.) Also published by Badger. Best., 1909. $1.25. A modern wrestle with the old story of Platonic friendship. Aglavaine, a highminded and cultured girl, shares the love of the husband of Selysette, the sweet sclf-belittling child-wife. In the half-spiritual motives, overcome in the end by jealousy and tragedy, and in the unusually lengthy monologues of these three deep-souled characters, who love the joys of silence and all things ill-fitted to the conventions of real living, Maeterlinck has expressed many of his own views of life and love. A drama to be loved because of its gentle pathos and soul-revelations rather than for its real dramatic significance. Reviewed in Westminster Rev., Apr., 1899, 151: 409-16! Fortnightly Rev., Aug., 1897. 68: 185-6, by V. M. Crawford: Living Age, 235: 193. Alladine and Palomides. Published also by F. Stokes. N. Y., 1908. S. paper, 25c. A love drama in which all the moods, the naively childish characters and the bare little externals of plot and movement resemble PelUas and MHisande. It is a revelation of the hidden life. "Mere words have no meaning" and whatever one sees of outward things about the play seems vague and far removed from actual existence. 41 42 MAETERLINCK Maeterlinck, Maurice. (The) blind. Published also undor title The sightless, tr. by Sir Laurence Alma Tadema. Lond. W. Scott. O. Is. (Scott library.) .-V one-act, one-scene play, in which a group of blind men helplessly grope about in a cavern-like forest place, seeking in vairi for their guide, a priest who is already dead. It symbolizes a world of people lost in the darkness of unfaith and uncertain where to fasten their reason. The story is simply told by the picture on the stage which the words of the blind men explain without further action. One feels the artist's touch throughout in the atmosphere and suggestion. Reviewed in Poet-lore, Oct.-Dec, 1901, 13: 554-60. by E. D. Daniels. Blue bird; a fairy play in five acts, tr. by Alexander Teixeira de Mattos. N. Y.. 1909. O. Dodd, SI. 20. Published also by Dodd. N. Y., 1910. 240 p. il. O. $2. (New theatre ed.) A symbolic play dealing with the dream adventures of Tyltil and Mytil, the children of a wood-cutter who are com- missioned by the fairy Birylune ... to go in quest of the Blue bird whose possession will enable man to discover the hidden souls of animals and things." Nation. Reviewed in Craftsman, Dec, 1910, 19: 246-61; Current Literature, Sept., 1909, 47: 305-11; Dial, May 1, 1909, 46: 296- 7; Hamptons Mag., Nov., 1910, 25: 671-3, 677; Independ- ent, Apr. 8. 1909. 66: 765; Munsey, Dec, 1910, 44: 414-15; Nation, Apr. 8, 1909, 88: 366-7; Outlook, Oct. 15, 1910, 96: 339-40; World to-day, Nov., 1910, 19: 1196. Death of Tintagiles. Published also separately by Gowans and Gray. Lond. D. paper. 6d. (Tr. by Alfred Sutro.) In this attempt to typify the struggle of human affection against death, the scene is fittingly laid in the remote realm of an ugly, mysterious Queen who pursues with undying hatred the child Tintagiles, heir to her throne. Though the setting is remote and unreal the theme is developed with truthfulness to life and dramatic power. Reviewed in Athensura, June 24, 1899, l: 794-5. (The) Home. Published also separately under title Interior (tr. by William Archer) by Gowans and Gray. Lond. D. paper 6d.; also by F. Stokes. N. Y. S. paper. 25c. Also in Maeterlinck, M. Three plays. (See above.) The dramatic make-up of this slight little play is closely fashioned after that of The blind and The intruder, hence it is unusual and unconventional — a play of situations and dramatic suggestiveness in which the interest centers in the rescuers of a drowned girl, who loiter outside and pityingly watch, through the closed shutters of a window, the little family group to whom they must break the painful news. Reviewed in Critic, June 22, 1895, 26: 451-3, by Israel Zangwill. (The) Intruder. Artful in its beautiful execution and in the subtle hold it has upon the attention, this play needs only to be read aloud to reveal its dramatic effectiveness. The invisible intruder is Death. The action centers in the death of a sick woman who does not appear at all in the play. Meanwhile a family group sit about a waning lamp and converse in a homely, realistic way. The symbolism, atmosphere and the use of simple, poetic words make one feel the awful presence of Death. It represents his most characteristic work in drama. Reviewed in Caine, Hall, Introduction to Maeterlinck's Princess Maleine, tr. by William Wilson, 1892, p. 8-19; Fort- nightly Rev., Sept., 1891, 56: 346-54, by William Archer. MAETERLINCK 43 Maeterlinck, Maurice. Joyzelle; a drama in five acts. tr. by Clarence Stratton. {See Poet-lorfe, 1905 16: 1-45.) Published also (bound with Monna Vanna) by Dodd X Y D. SI.20; also by G. Allen. Lend. O. 3s. 6d. " ' As the author expresses the motive, "it is the triumph of love and will over fatality." In its vague dealing with un- seen powers and justice it resembles his later work, Monna Vanna, though in comparison it is a more commonplace drama, inferior in its style and distasteful in its subject. Reviewed in Fortnightly Rev.. July, 1903, 80: 76-87 by M. A. Gerothwohl; Critic. Aug.. 1903. 43: 114-15, by Grace Corneau. Mary Magdalene; a play in three acts; tr. by Alex- ander Teixeira de Mattos. 182 p. D. N. Y., 1910 Dodd. SI. 20. "The influence of Christ is the moving influence of the drama, and thrice his voice is heard behind the scenes. . . . His presence in the course of the drama has so miraculously changed the heart of the Magdalene that she, who had sinned so often cannot ... sin once more even to save her Saviour from the cross." A study of the ennoblement of a woman's soul by spiritual ecstasy. Reviewed in .-Mhenaeum, Nov. 5, 1910, 2: 565; Bookman, Dec. 1910, 32: 419-21; Current Literature, Dec, 1910, 49: 667-9; Dial, Dec 16, 1910, 49: 522; Nation, Oct. 20, 1910. 91 : 374. Monna Vanna; a plav in three acts, tr. by A. I. D. Coleman. 143 p. O. N. Y.. 1904. Harper. SI. 20 net. The scene is laid at Pisa at the close of the 15th century when Pisa, as an ally of Venice, was besieged by the Floren- tines. The motive is the heroism of a pure-minded woman who sacrifices herself for the city, and discovers the difference between the love and perfect trust of her captor and the cruelty and jealousy shown by her husband. Without being a masterpiece or possessing any great dramatic power it abounds in imagination and delicate literary touches. The translation is good. Reviewed in Dial, Oct. 16, 1903, 35: 257-8, by E. E. Hale, Jr.; Nation, Oct. 15, 1903, 77: .307; Athenaeum, June 28, 1902, 1: 827; Nineteenth Cent., Julv 1902, 52: 72-5, 282-91; Fort- nightly Rev., Aug., 1902, 78: 183-6, bv L. A. Tadema; Har- per's Weekly. Nov. 11, 1905, 49: 1640; Bookman, Sept., 1902, 16: 46-9, by F. T. Cooper. Pelleas and MeHsande. Published also (bound with The sightless) by W. Scott. Lond. O. Is. (Tr. by Sir Laurence Alma Tadema.) .Mso by Crowell. N. Y., 1908. 135 p. D. $l..i0 (tr. by Ewing Wins- low.) Old forgotten castles, haunted forests and mysterious black pools make a romantic setting for this modern revision of the historic Da Rimini story. The characters are dim and confused, more abstract than vital, and hidden meanings crowd each scene, yet the play is suggestive of life in its pas- sion and profound dramatic truth. Reviewed in Archer, William. Study and the stage, 1899, p. 133-7; Symons, .'\rthur. Plays, acting and music, 1903, Dial, 18: 174, by E. E. Hale. Jr.; Dial, Dec. 1, 1908, 45: 415; Independent, Oct. 8, 1908, 65: 843; Literary Digest. Oct. 1, 1910, 41: 544-5; Saturday Rev., Sept. 3, 1910, 110: 296. 44 MAETERLIXCK Maeterlinck, Maurice. Princess Maleine; a drama in rive acts, tr. by Gerard Harry, and The intruder, a drama in one act, based on a tr. of William Wilson; with an introduction by Hall Caine. 255 p. D. Lond., 1892. Heinemann, 5s. Savage and violent love and tragedy. Terror is the key- note that fills the air about the murky palace, its hideous royalty and the unfortunate Maleine. The action has little sequence. A fateful, mysterious, shuddering mood grows more and more tense till a ridiculously cyclonic clima.x is reached. Many commentators refer to it as a "Shakespeare anthology" by reason of its marked likeness to various parts of Hamlet, ^Iacbeth and Lear. Reviewed in Caine, Hall, Introduction to Maeterlinck's Princesse Maleine, tr. by Gerard Harry, 1892, p. 1-8; Critic, June 22, 1895, 2ij: 451-3. by Israel Zangwill; .Academy, Mar. 19, 1892, '11: 270-2, by William Sharp; Fortnightly Rev., Sept., 1891, 56: 346-54, by VVUliam Archer. (The) seven princesses; tr. by Charlotte Porter and Helen A. Clarke. {See Poet-lore, 1894, 6: 29-32; 87-93; 150-61.) Published also by Gowans & Gray. Lond. O. paper. 6d. (Tr. by William Metcalfe.) -A romantic story with some poetical quality, showing the playwright's pronounced originality and independence. The setting is not to be placed in any particular locality, but is the ever-dilapidated castle of most of his plays and an old king and queen who typify the past. Finely earnest scenes follow weak and flabby ones in an unsatisfactory way; some- times tragical, sometimes ridiculous, and with an amusing repetition of phrase. While the play gives no impression of preaching a moral lesson there is, lurking back of every line and incident, a hidden meaning suggesting greater and deeper things. Sister Beatrice and Ariane and Barbe Bleue; two plays tr. into English verses from the manuscript, by Bernard Miall. 183 p. D. N. Y., 1902. Dodd, $1.20 net. Published also by G. Allen. Lond., 1902. D. 3s. 6d. .A simple, unforced translation, the former in blank verse, the latter in irregular rhymed verse. Sister Beatrice is slight, without the subtlety of meaning or the strangeness of atmosphere that are characteristic of most of the author's work. Mr. Hale describes Ariane and Barbe Bleue as a sort of commentary on Maeterlinck by reason of its sub- jectively explanatory nature. "Truth is not found in the beaten path of humanity but in the secret depths of the soul where it is locked by the force of worldly authority, conven- tion, tradition and prudery." This doctrine is exemplified in Ariane, when she insists that of all the keys that Blue- beard has given her, the only one of value is the forbidden one. Reviewed in Athenaeum, May 3, 1902, 1: 554-5; Critic, Sept., 1902, 41: 275. Criticism Archer, William. Maeterlinck as a pessimist playwright. (See Fortnightly Rev., Sept., 1891, 56: 346-54.) Burton, Richard. Maurice Maeterlinck; a dramatic im- pressionist. (5ee Atlantic Mo., Nov., 1894, 74: 672-80.) A description of the dramatist's peculiar qualities as re- vealed in his various plays, with the addition of some con- clusions formed by the writer. MAETERLIXCK 45 Campbell, Janey Sevilla. Impressional drama. (See Nineteenth Cent., Aug., 1905, 58: 204-13.) To quote the writer, "There is a tendency of thought toward a psychical interpretation of life," and Maeterlinck in his Pelleas and MHisajide is cited as an illustration. Chesterton, Gilbert Keith. Dramas in whisper. {See his Books and personalities. 1905. p. 142-.) Maeterhnck. (See his Varied types. 1903. p. 209-14.) Reviewed in Nation, Dec. 24, 1903, 77: 509; Atlantic Mo., Sept., lOai, 94: 423-1; .Vthenzeum, Dec. 27, 1902, 2: 845-6. Courtney, William Leonard. Development of Maurice Maeterlinck and other sketches of foreign writers. Lend.. 1904. Richards, 3s. 6d. net. The "other foreign writers" include Rodenbach, Huys- mans, D'Annunzio, TurgeniefT, Tolstoi and Gorky. Mr. Courtney is sympathetic and acute in his interpretation of Maeterlinck's philosophy and development. Reviewed in Contemporary Rev., Sept., 1904, 86: 452-5; Athenaeum, July 10, 1904, 2: 70. Crawford, Virginia M. Maurice Maeterlinck. (See her Studies in foreign literature. 1899. p. 139-74.) Clearly written, enthusiastic and fairly thoughtful essays on the symbolists. Reviewed in Bookman, Mar., 1900, 11: 89-90; Nation, Dec. 21, 1899, 69: 472-3. Daniels, E. D. Cursory review of symbolism in Maeter- linck's The blind. (See Poet-lore, 1901, 13: 554-60). Henderson, Archibald. Maurice Maeterlinck, sym- bolist and mystic. (See Arena, Feb., 1906, 35: 115- 24.) M. Maurice Maeterlinck, moralist and artist. (See Living Age, July, 1901, 230: 201-20.) Publish'^d also in the Edinburgh Rev., Apr., 1901, 193: 350- t i . Maeterlinck, Maurice. Evolution of mystery; tr. by Alfred Sutro. (See Fortnightly Rev., May, 1900, 73:899-921.) Valuable as Maeterlinck's own explanation of the pre- dominant element in his plays. His prose essays furnish the best clue to his aims and ideals and the best method of un- raveling his mystical puzzles. (The) modem drama; tr. by .Alfred Sutro. (See his The double garden. 1904. p. 115-35.) Of value for a close study of the ideas that are at the bottom of all his work. Marked by his distinction of style and fresh- ness of vision. Suggestive if not convincing. Published also in the Cornhill Mag., 80: 166-73, tr. by X. T. de Mattos. translator and translated. (See Independent, Sept. 16, 1909, 67: 666-8.) Review of Maeterlinck's translation of Macbeth. Maeterlinck, Mme. Maurice. Later heroines of Mau- rice Maeterlinck. (See Fortnightly Rev., Jan., 1910, 93:48-56.) Divides his later heroines into the naive woman and the woman who dares, with particular reference to Aglavaine, Joyzelle, Monna Vanna and Ariane. Summarized in Current Literature, May, 1910, 48: 554-8. Maeterlinck's methods of life and work. (See Con- temporary Rev., Nov., 1910. 98: 552-7.) Summarized in Review of Rev., Dec, 1910, 42: 729-30. Maeterlinck's exit from shadowland. (See Current Literature, Dec, 1910, 49: 667-9.) FERLI^^^^ 46 MAETERLI Maurice Maeterlinck {See Living Age, Oct., 1902, 235: l'J3-l'U5). "Discusses the growing realistic and optimistic elements in his later work. Newman, Ernest. Maeterlinck and music. (See Atlan- tic Mo., Dec, lyUl, 88: 769-77.) Emphasizes the sympathy in dramatic theory between Wagner, the musician, and Maeterlinck, the mystic. Nordau, Max. Maurice Maeterlinck. {See his Degen- eration. 189.5. p. 232-40.) Osgood, Hamilton. Maeterlinck and Emerson. {See Arena, Mar., 1896. 15: 563-73.) Trai.(.s iMiierson's influence upon Maeterlinck. Phelps, Albert. Later work of Maurice Maeterlinck, {See Poet-lore, July-Sept., 1899. 11: 357-72.) Discusses the metaphysical ideas of wisdom, destiny, love and justice as handled by Maeterlinck in his essays, and is remotely of interest as a study of his plays. Phelps, William Lyon. Maeterlinck and Browning. {See Independent, 55: 552-4. 1398-1400.) Gives the reasons for the similarity between Luria and Monna Vanna. and a reply to the same. Pidoiix, Magdeleine. Maurice Maeterlinck at home. {See Bookman. Jan.. 1901. 12: 104-7.) A good biographical sketch. Ropes, Arthur R. Maeterlinck. {See Contemporary Rev., Mar., 1900, 77: 422-36.) This review may be summed up in the following quota- tion: "Maeterlinck has suggested much, but achieved little." Soissons, S. C. de. Maeterlinck as a reformer of the drama. {See Contemporary Rev.. Nov., 1904, 86: 699- 708.) A staunch defense of Maeterlinck against his would-be critics. Steiner, Edward A. A visit to Maeterlinck. {See Out- look, Nov. 16. 1901, 69: 701-3.) Strang, Lewis C. Sudermann and Maeterlinck. {See his Plavers and plays of the last quarter of a century. 1903. 'v. 2. p. 259-71.) Biographical sketches and critical estimates of the famous actors and actresses of the last twenty-five years and the plays in which they appeared. Symons, Arthur. Maeterlinck as a mystic. {See his Symbolist movement in literature. 1899. p. 153-68.) A subtle book, containing a number of charmingly written essays, fresh and vivid with the thought of a critic who be- longs to the school of symbolists. Reviewed in Athenffium, Mar. 24, 1900, 1: 360. Thorold, A. Six masters in disillusion. N. Y., 1909. $1.50. Discusses Fontenelle, M€rimee, Fabre, Huysmans. Maeter- linck. Anatole France. Reviewed in Current Literature. Aug., 1909, 47: 160-4. (p. 160^2 deal with Maeterlinck.) Transformation of Maeterlinck. {See Current Litera- ture, Mar., 1909. 46: 285-8.) Discusses Maeterlinck's development from pessimism to optimism. Walkley, Arthur Bingham. Maeterlinck. {See his Frames of mind. 1899.) "Displays a praiseworthy and varied erudition. Illum- inating and pleasant." Saturday Rev., 115: 40. Zangwill, Israel. Men, women and books. {See Critic, June 22. 1895, 26: 451-3.) PHILLIPS Phillips, Stephen. Herod; a tragedy. 128 p. D. Lond.. 1901. Lane. §1.50. "A successful drama in stately and beautiful blank verse. Theme, the conflict between Herod's passionate love for his queen and his overmastering self-love and ambition." Reviewed in Saturday Rev., 90: 754; Spectator, Dec. 15, 1900, 85: 887; Athenaeum, Jan. 5, 1901, 1: 27; Nation, Apr. 25, 1901, 72: 343; Atlantic Mo., 87: 421; Contemporary Rev.. Jan., 1901, 79: 32-7. by Stephen Gwynn; Fortnightly Rev., Jan., 1901, 75: 178-8G; Forum, Dec, 1909, 42: 578-9. Nero. 200 p. D. N. Y., 1906. Macmillan, SI. 25. A spectacular drama of high literary quality and finished workmanship, opening with the murder of Claudius and ending with the burning of Rome. Reviewed in .'Academy, Mar., 1906, 70: 223; Spectator, Mar., 1906, 96: 426; Nation. Apr. 19, 1906, 82: 325; Fortnightly Rev., Jan., 1906, 86: 83-95, by J. S. Roberts; Outlook, Mar. 9, 1907, 85: 572. Paolo and Francesca; a tragedy in four acts. 120 p. D. Lond., 1903. Lane, S1.50. "A rarely beautiful poem which is at the same time a fairly good acting drama, based on the story of Paolo and Fran- cesca as told by Dante. It combines in a remarkable way the simplicity, unity and restraint of the Greek drama with the passion and color of modern dramatic art. The whole is instinct with the utmost purity and delicacy of feeling. It unquestionably places Mr. Phillips in the first rank of modern dramatists and modern poets." Saturday Revieu'. Reviewed in Ainger, Rev. Alfred, Lectures and essays, V. 2, p. 168-81; Athenaeum, Jan., 1900. 1: 6; Dial, Jan. 16, 1900. 28: 49, by W. M. Payne; Forum, Mar.. 1900, 29: 116-28, by W. P. Trent; Nation. May 10, 1900, 70: 361; Nineteenth Cent., Dec, 1899, 46: 915-33, by Sidney Colvin; Saturday Rev., Dec. 9, 1899, 88: sup. 5; Spectator, Dec. 2, 1899, 83: 839. Pietro of Siena. 82 p. D. N. Y.. 1910. Macmillan. $1. Pietro, who overthrows Luigi, ruler of Siena, spares his life because of love for Gemma, sister of Luigi, and the threat- ened tragedy comes to a happy conclusion. Though the action is confined between sunrise and sunset the work is an example of skilful rhetoric rather than of powerful drama. Reviewed in Spectator, Nov. 26, 1910. 105: 912. Sin of David. 141 p. D. N. Y., 1904. Macmillan. $1.25. "A modern version of the Hebrew story of David, Uriah and Bathsheba. Scene, England during the Cromwellian wars." While it lacks true dramatic fire it still ranks in the class with Herod and Ulysses for its purely literary quality. "Has the general air of being better designed for the closet than the stage." Reviewed in .\thenaeum, Feb. 4. 1905, 1: 155; Nation. Jan. 26, 1905, 80: 72; Spectator, Nov. 26. 1904, 93: 837-8; Dial, Jan. 16. 1905, 38: 47; Bookman, Feb., 1905, 20: 554. 47 48 PHILLIPS Phillips, Stephen. Ulysses; a drama in a prologue and three acts. 148 p. D. N. V.. 1902. Macmillan, SI. 25. Selected episodes from the Odyssey "rearranged, reimagined, unsparingly accelerated and cut down." "A poem that can be read (except for the prolopuc) with unalloyed satisfaction, and a play that deserves to hold the stage." Reviewed in Dial, May 1, 1902, 32: 317; Saturday Rev., Feb. 22. 1902, 93: 236-7; Spectator, Feb. 15, 1902, 88: 254-5; Atlantic Mo., .\pr.. 1902, 89: 565-7; Bookman, Apr., 1902, 15: 168-70, by Edith Wharton; Nineteenth Cent., Mar., 1902, 51: 434-13. by Stephen Gwynn; Poet-lore, Oct., 1902, 14: 126. and Carr, J. Comyns. Faust; freely adapted from GcEthe's dramatic poe'm. 239 p. D. N. Y., 1908. Mac- millan, SI. 25. "Free paraphrase of Goethe's poem which presents the main events of the legend with a more narrow continuity of narra- tive." Although a meritorious effort, it cannot be considered a dangerous competitor of its original. Reviewed in Atlantic, Dec, 1908, 102: 812; Bookman, Dec, 1908, 28: 303-4; Current Literature, Nov., 1908, 43: 551-2; Forum, Sept., 1908, 40: 221-4; Nation, Sept. 24, 1908, 37: 294-5. Criticism Archer, William. Real conversations; Conversation III with Mr. Stephen Phillips. {See Critic, June, 1901, 38: 504-11.) The conversation is concerned with Ulysses in particular and the drama in general. Of moderate interest. Stephen Phillips. (See his Poets of the younger generation. 1902, p. 309-54.) Mainly devoted to Phillips, the poet. The long criticism of Herod and Paolo and Francesca is divided sanely between praise and fault finding. Boynton, Henry Walcott. Poetrv and the stage. {See Atlantic Mo., July, 1903, 92: 120-6.) •\ prophecy of the stage success of Paolo and Francesca. Gosse, Edmund. Revival of poetic drama. {See Atlan- tic Mo., Aug., 1902, 90: 156-66.) A cheerful essay, calling attention to the injudicious praise that has been heaped upon Phillips, yet prophesying a greater development of his powers in the future. Stephen Phillips. {See Century Mag., Jan., 1901, 61 : 4.30-3.) .4 personal sketch. Gwynn, Stephen. Poetry and the stage. {See Fort- nightly Rev., Feb., 1909, 91: 337-51.) Same article in Living .Age, Apr. 3, 1909, 261: 3-14. General discussion of Phillips' merits as poet and dramatist. Hellems, F. B. R. Stephen Phillips as a writer of tragedy. Atlantic Mo., Dec, 1908, 102: 809-21. Henderson, Archibald. Stephen Phillips; poet and dramatist. {See Arena, May, 1905, 33: 474-81.) Mr. Henderson's criticisms indicate a wide and general reading along dramatic lines, but reveal no serious study of Phillips. Howells, William Dean. The new poetic drama. {See North American Rev., May, 1901, 172: 794-800.) A comparison of Phillips with Rostand. PHILLIPS 49 Le Gallienne, Richard. Poetry of Stephen Phillips. (See Bookman, Mar., 1901, 13: 24-9.) Secondarily the article considers Herod and other tragedies. Mr. Stephen Phillips. {See Quarterly Rev., 195: 486- 50(J.j A critical and biographical study of Phillips in which his originality, influence, success in poetic drama and the reasons for his popularity are discussed. Published also in Living Age, June, 1902. 233: 641-50. Porter, Charlotte. Phillips' Paolo and Francesca and Swinburne's Rosamund. (See Poet-lore, Jan.- Mar.. 1900, 12: 120-36.) Recent British poetry. (See Nation, 70: 361.) .'\ comparison between Swinburne and Phillips. Savage, Ernest A. Stephen Phillips. (See Westminster ^ Rev., Aug., 1901, 156: 187-96.) Th- dramatic works of Phillips are criticized at length. Symons, Arthur. Mr. Stephen Phillips. (See his Studies in prose and verse. 1904. p. 242-60.) A significant book of criticism by a distinguished literary critic. Todhunter, John. Blank verse on the stage. (See Fortnightly Rev., Feb., 1902. 77: 346-60.) Mainly concerned with Stephen Phillips. A close study of his metre with some comparisons. Poetic drama, and its prospects on the stage. (See Fortnightly Rev., Apr., 1902, 77: 713-25.) Makes special reference to Phillips. Wharton, Mrs. Edith. The three Francescas. (See North American Rev., July, 1902, 175: 17-30.) -•^ comparison of Phillips, Crawford and D'Annunzio. Wodehouse, E. A. Valuation of Mr. Stephen Phillips. (See Fortnightly Rev., May, 1905, 83: 830-42.) PINERO Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. (The) Amazons; a farcical romance in three acts. 1G9 p. D. Lond. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by VV. H.Baker. Bost.,1895. 189 p.D. paper. 50c. A whimsical and extravagant satire on the tendency to edu- cate girls in masculine pursuits. "It is too flimsy, both in conception and execution, to with- stand the strain of critical examination. It has, how^ever, the distinguished merit of being amusing and cleverly written." Critic. Reviewed in Athenaeum. Mar., 1893, 1: 322; Critic. Feb. 24, 1894, 24: 136-7. Benefit of the doubt. 300 p. S. Lond., 1895. Heine- mann, 2s. 6d. "In its vigorous satire of social affectations and follies it may in its class stand comparison with most past and any present work. As a study in feminine nature little in Ibsen is more revolutionary and little in Balzac more profound." Alhenaum. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Oct., 1895, 2: 542; Critic, Nov. 2, 1895, 27: 283, by Arthur Waugh; Jan. 18, 1895, 28: 49; Satur- day Rev., Oct. 19, 1895, 80: 503-04, by G. B. Shaw. Cabinet minister; a farce in four acts. 202 p. D. Lond., 1892. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W.H. Baker. Bost.,1894. D. paper. 50c. Deals with the perplexities of the wife of a Cabinet minister who. to escape a financial crisis, accepts the aid of an im- possible money-lender who demands social recognition in return. The characters are skilfully and humorously drawn but the work as a whole is little more than an amusing series of episodes. Reviewed in Academy, July 19, 1890, 38: 56; Athenaeum, Apr., 1890, 1: 541; June, 1905, 1: 731; Critic, Mar. 26, 1892,20: 182; Gentleman's Mag., Mar., 1892, n. s. 48: 319-20, by J. H. McCarthy; Theatre. June, 1890, 24: 284. 312. Dandy Dick; a farce in three acts. 164 p. D. Lond., 1893. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. A study of middle-class sporting life full of humor and good- natured cynicism. Has had a long and successful stage career. Reviewed in Academy, Feb. 5, 1887, 31: 100; Athenaeum, Feb., 1887. Critic, Oct. 15, 1887, 11: 190; Saturday Rev., Feb. 17, 1900, by Max Beerbohm. Gay Lord Que.x; a comedy in four acts. 226 p. D. Lond. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by R. H. Russell. N. Y., 1900. 186 p. O. $1.25. A study of fast life among the upper classes. Severely criti- cized for insincerity and defective technique but notwith- standing the critics, a great stage success. Reviewed in Academy, Apr. 15, 1899, 56: 436-7; May 17, 1902, 62: 511-12, by Arthur Symons; Athenaeum, Apr., 1899,1: 475; Nov., 1908, 2: 583; Critic. Jan., 1901, 38: 38-42; Harper's Weekly, Dec. 1, 1900, 44: 1142, by L. Reamer; Munsey, Jan., 1901, 24: 604-08, by J. R. Towse; Saturday Rev., Apr. 15, 1899, 87: 459-60, by Max Beerbohm. Hester's mystery. D. N. Y., n. d. S. French, paper. 15c. 60 PINERO 51 One of Pinero's earlier plays. The villain, in order to force the heroine to marry him, attempts to create a mystery about her unexplained absence from a boarding school. The mystery is satisfactorily explained along lines conventional both in plot and style. l<.-:viewed in Academy, June 26, 1880, 17: 483; Athenaeum, June, 1880, 1: 772; Saturday Rev., July 3, 1880, 50: 20. Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. His house in order; a comedy in four acts. 23U p. D. Lond., 1906. Heine- mann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1907. 204 p. D. 50c. A study of the oppressiveness and bigotry of middle-class English social conventions and the vindication of a wife who dared to defy them. "So actual that some people already find it unnatural. It, isjjust as realistic and natural as Gorky's "Out of the Depths." " R. Ross. Reviewed in Walkley, .\. B., Drama and life, 1908; .'Academy Feb. 10, 190(5, 70: 140-1; .Athenaeum, Feb., 1906, 1: 179; Feb., 1907, 1: 144; Bookman, Dec, 1900, 24: 331; Current Literature, Apr., 1906, 40: 403-04; Nov., 1906, 41: 543-8 (criticism and extracts); Harper's Weekly, Nov. 24, 1906, 50: 1682, by VV. D. HowcUs; Reader, Aug., 1906, 8: 333-4; Satur day Rev., Feb. 10, 1906, 101: 167-8. Hobby horse; a comedy in three acts. 180 p. D. Lond., 1892. Hcinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by VV. H. Baker. Bost., 1894. D. paper. 50c. A satire on the tendency to promote philanthropic schemes as a social pastime. Bright and amusing rather than con- vincing. Reviewed in .\thenaeum, Oct., 1886, 2: 576; Critic, Nov. 20, 1886, 9: 253. In chancery; an original fantastic comedy in three acts. 72 p. D. N. Y., cl905. S. French, 50c. Study of double personality due to loss of memory. One of the early plays, first produced in 1884 and revived in 1890. "One of Mr. Pinero's most humorous works with strongly contrasted characters. . . . Full of mirthful situations from first to last." Illuslrated London News. Reviewed in Walkley, A. B. Drama and life, 1908; Theatre, Jan.. 1891, 26: 37^0; Oct., 1884, n. s. 4: 216-17. Iris; a drama in five acts. 232 p. D. Lond., 1902. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by R. H. Russell. N. Y., 1902. 228 p. D. .SI; also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1905. D. paper. 50c. .A. study in the demoralizing effect of bad environment. Interesting and thought provoking even if somewhat lacking in the sympathy necessary to make a play truly great. Reviewed in Academy, Sept., 28, 1901, 61: 251; Athenaeum, Sept., 1901, 2: 392; Dial. Feb., 1902. 32: 112-14; Bookman, Nov., 1902, 16: 280-2; Critic, Nov.. 1902, 41: 444-5, by J. R. Towse; Fortnightly Rev., Nov., 1901, 76: 902-10, by W. L. Courtney; Reader, Dec, 1902. 1: 179-80. by J. D. Barry. Lady Bountiful; a story of years; a play in four acts. 200 p. S. Lond., 1892. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. The effects of indiscriminate liberality in money matters. "Distinguished ... by purpose and originality and possesses qualities of high literary merit. It abounds in contrasts of character." Critic. Reviewed in .Athenaeum, Mar., 1891. 1: 354; Critic, Nov. 21, 1891, 19: 2S5; Theatre, Apr.. 1891, 26: 202-04. Letty; an original drama in four acts and an epi- logue. 254 p. D. Lond., 1904. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1905. 225 p. D. paper. 50c. 52 PIXERO The temptations of a young girl exposed to rather dubious society. The ending is conventional and the play as a whole is superficial. Reviewed in Academy. Oct. 17, 1903. 65: 418-19; Jan. 23. 1904. OG: 104; Bookman, Nov., 19&1, 20: 184; Athenaeum, Oct. 17. 1903, 2: .523-4; Current Literature, Nov., 19tM, 37: 453-4; Reader, Feb.. 1905. 5: 361-2; Saturday Rev.. Oct. 17. 24. 1903. 96: 487-9. 511-12. by Max Beerbohm. Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. Magistrate; a farce in three acts. 178 p. S. Lond.. 1>S92. Heinemann. 2s. 6d. -Vction revolves around the attempt of a woman to hide from her second husband the real ages of herself and her son by her first husband. Thoroughly farcical without being coarse. A great success on the stage. Reviewed in .Vcademy. Mar. 28. 1885. 27: 231; Jan. 16. 1886. 29: 50; Athenaeum, Mar., 1885, 1: 418. Mid-channel; a play in four acts. 224 p. D. Bost., 1910. W. H. Baker, 50c. .•V study of middle-class life of low ideals. "A disagreeable but exceedingly able work; a dreary tale set forth with great skill and compelling power." Nation. "In Mid-channel there is but one person who is not saliently vulgar and this is an elderly woman who has little to do with the play." Beerbohm. Reviewed in Eaton, W. P. At the New Theatre and others, 1910; Athenaeum, Sept. 11, 1909, 2: 307-08; Bookman. Mar.. 1910. 31: 68-70; by C. Hamilton; Nation, Feb. 3, 1910, 90: 120; Saturday Rev., Sept. 11. 1909. 108: 310-11, by Max Beerbohm. The monev spinner; an original comedy in two acts. 43 p. D. N. Y., 1900. S. French, paper. 25c. One of Pinero's first successes. (Produced Nov.. 1880.) The "money spinner." so called from her skill at cards, risks disgrace to save her husband from financial ruin. While conventional in theme the play shows promise of the author's later success in stagecraft and character delineation. Reviewed in Academy, Jan. 29, 1881, 19: 89; Critic, Jan. 28. 1882. 2: 30; Theatre. Feb.. 1881. n. s. 3: 113-14; Dec. 1880. n. s. 2: 372-3. Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith; a drama in four acts. 232 p. D. Lond., 1895. Heinemann.' 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost.. 1900. 200 p. S. paper. 50c. Generally considered one of the author's best plays. "He has used the popular sex interest as a peg on which to hang a problem of far finer value — the fallacy of resigning our ideals to suit the exigencv of our environment." A . Waugh. Reviewed in Academy. Mar. 23, 1895. 47: 262-3. by W. H. Davenport Adams; Athenaeum. Mar.. 1895. 1: 353; Critic. Mar. 30. 1895, 26: 248; May 18, 1895, 26: 356, bv I. Zangvvill. Saturday Rev.. Mar. 9. 1901. 91: 300-1. by Max Beerbohm. Preserving Mr. Panmure; a comic plav in four acts. 137 p. D. Lond.. 1910. Chiswick Press. Pinero's latest production. Excellent in its stage-craft but perilously near bad taste in parts. The setting, like all of Pinero's later work, involves much social vulgarity. Reviewed in .Athenaeum, Jan.. 1911. 1: 107; Academy. Jan. 28, 1911, 80: 108-10; Saturday Rev.. Jan. 28. 1911, 111: 75. Princess and the butterfly, or The fantastics; a comedy in five acts. 250 p. D. Lond., 1898. Heine- mann, 2s. 6d. PIXERO 53 Published also by S. French. N. Y. D. 50c. A fantastic sketch centerinR around two middle-aged char- acters who demonstrate the perennial youth of love. "A good old-fashioned, well-seasoned bit of sentimental drawing-room fiction." G. B. Shaw. Reviewed in .-Academy, Apr. 3, 1897, 51: 383-4. by G. B. Shaw; Athenaeum, Apr. 3, 1897, 1: 454; Critic, Apr. 17, 1897, 30: 277, by Arthur Waugh; Nov. 27. 1897, 31: 327-8; Fort- nightly Rev., May, 1897. 67: 740-56, by \V. L. Courtney; Saturday Rev., Apr. 3, 1897, 83: 348-9, by G. B. Shaw. Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. (The) profligate; a play in four acts. 14S p. S. Lonfl., 1891. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by \V. H. Baker. Bost., 1894. D. paper. 50c. Shows the retribution which comes from a dissolute life and the power of a good woman in uplifting a man. A powerful, unconventional play. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Apr. 1889, 1: 546; Academy, June 8, 1889. 35: 403-04, by Frederick VVedmore; Theatre, May 7, 1889, 13: 322-4; June, 1889, 22: 331-4. (The) rocket; an original comedy in three acts. 80 p. D. N. Y. 1905. S. French, 50c. A rascally old "Chevalier" attempts to getawealthy husband for his pretended daughter. Her real father, long missing, returns, proves his relationship and the Chevalier's dreams of wealth come down like a rocket. Farce of the broadest and most extravagant kind, but does not transgress the bounds of good taste. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Dec, 1883, 2: 786; Saturday Rev., Dec. 29, 1883, 56:834. (The) school-mistress; a farce in three acts. 176 p. S. Lond., 1894. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1894. 177 p. D. paper. 50c. The mistress of a boarding school, in order to keep her impecunious husband in style, determines to go on the stage. A fire brings her home unexpectedly, to her husband's dis- comfiture. Unpretentious in plot and treatment, it is a suc- cessful farce. Reviewed in Academy, July 3, 1886, 30: 17; Athenaeum, Apr., 1886, 1: 465; Theatre, May 10, 1886, n. s. 1 : 228. Second Mrs. Tanqueray. 202 p. D. 1-ond., 1S95. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1894. 174 p. D. paper. 50c. Probably the best known and one of the most esteemed of the author's works. A powerful and relentless statement of the fact that a past can never be entirely overcome even with the greatest effort. Reviewed in Academy, Feb. 24, 1894, 45: 174-5; June 10, 1893, 43: .509-10, by Frederick Wedmore; Athenaeum, Sept., 1901, 2: .360; Critic, Oct. 14. 1893. 23: 244; Gentleman's Mag., Jan., 1894, 276: 98-102; Saturday Rev., 23 Feb., 1895, 79: 250- 1, by G. B. Shaw; Theatre. Sept., 1893, 34: 139^4; Mar., 1895. .37: 152-4, by A. Brereton. (The) squire; an original comedy in three acts. 81 p. D. N. Y., cl905. S. French, paper. 25c. This play roused a storm of controversy when produced in 1882 because of its alleged resemblances to Thomas Hardy's "Far from the madding crowd." (For both sides of controversy see Theatre Mag., Feb., Apr., Oct., 1882, ser. 3, 5: 107-10; 202-04; 6: 246-7. Oct.. 1882.) Reviewed in .•Vcademy, Jan. 14, 1882, 21: 34; Critic, Oct. 21, 1882, 2: 287-8. 64 PINERO Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. Sweet Lavender; a do- iiu-stic tlrania in three acts. 192 p. S. Lond., 1S93. Heineinann, 2s. Gd. PublislK'd also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1893. S. paper. 50c. .\ clean, wholt-sonic play which, with all its defects, deserved its long stage popularity. Reviewed in Academy. Mar. 31, 1888. 33: 228, by Frederick Wedmore; Critic. Nov. 24, 1888, 13: 262-3; Athenaeum, Mar., 1888, 1: 382; Theatre, May, 1888. 20: 263-5; Nov., 1890: 25: 234-5. (The) thunderbolt; an episode in the history of a provincial family; in four acts. 270 p. D. Lond., 1909. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1909. 237 p. D. paper. 50c. "Has caught to a nicety the manners, tricks of speech and idiosyncrasies of many well-to-do folk of the midlands. The strength of the piece lies in its technical perfection." Athevirum. "It is probable that Mr. Pinero has never written a play of such excellence as this one." Academy. Reviewed in Academy, May 16, 1908, 74: 792; Athenaeum, May, 1908, 1: 615; Bookman, Jan., 1911, 32: 464-7, by C. Hamilton; Current Literature, Feb., 1911, 50: 184-91(excerpts); Everybody's, Mar., 1911, 24: 412-14; Munsey, Jan. 11, 562- 3, bv M. White, Jr.; Nation, Oct. 27, 1910, 91: 398; Nov. 17. 1910, 91: 479; Saturday Rev., May 16, 1908, 105: 624-5, by Max Beerbohm. (The) times; a corned V in four acts. 204 p. S. Lend., 1891. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1894. D. paper. 50c. .A wealthy merchant with social and parliamentary ambi- tions has his plans frustated by the marriage of his son to a pretty but vulgar girl. "It lays bare no horrid social wound, it wrangles over no vital problems of inextricable perplexity." Preface. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Oct., 1891, 2: 593. Trelawny of the "Wells"; a comedietta in four acts. 224 p. S. Lond., 1899. Heinemann, 2s. Gd. "The primary object of it is entertainment, which it provides in most liberal measure, and the distinctive merit of it is that the entertainment is not only light but intellectual." Critic. "Such dramatic effect as it embodies is obtained by contrast, the inner life of the stage, with its tawdry squalor being thrown into sharp relief against a background of West End society." Academy. Reviewedin Academy, Jan. 29, 1898, 53: 133-4; Athenaum, Jan. 3. 1898, 1: 159; Bookman, Jan., 1899, 8: 424-8, by Nor- man Hapgood; Critic, Jan., 1899, 34: 41-3; Munsey's Mag., Feb., 1911, 44: 710; Saturday Rev., Feb. 5, 1898, 85: 170-2, by G. B. Shaw. (The) weaker sex; a comedy in three acts. p. S. Lond., 1894. Heinemann, 2s. Gd. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1894. 133 p. S. paper. 50c. "Mr. Pinero's vigorous hits at a world of 'gentlemanly ladies and zoological gentlemen.' " Academy. Reviewed in Academy, Apr. 13, 1889, 35: 260-1, by Frederick Wedmore; Athenaeum, Mar., 1889, 1: 385; Theatre; Apr., 1889, 22: 218-20. Wife without a smile; a comedy in disguise. 230 p. D. Lond., 1905. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. Published also by W. H. Baker. Bost., 1905. 166 p. D. paper. 50c. Severely criticized at the time of its production (Oct., 1904) on account of some ill-advised stage effects. PINERO 55 "Dubbed 'a comedy in disguise' but in reality an unpleasant problem treated with unbecoming levity. ... A farce which is not comic. . . . When not unpleasant it degenerates into buffoonery." Reviewedin Academy. Oct. 22, 1904,67: 367-8; Athenaeum, Oct. 22, 1904. 2: 523; Saturday Rev., Oct. 22. 29, 1904. 98: 511-12, 545-6, by Max Beerbohm. Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. Carr. J. Comyns. and Sul- livan, Sir Arthur. (The) beauty stone; an original romantic musical drama in three acts. 101 p. O. Lond., 1898. Chappell & Co.. Is Libretto by Pinero and Carr. Also, with music, Chappell & Co., 1898. 217 p. Q. o. p. "That Mr. Pinero in association with Sir Arthur Sullivan should have failed to make Mephisto interesting is certainly a very remarkable fact; but so it is." Academy. "The indisputable dullness of their 'Beauty stone' comes mainly from their pseudo-archaic manner. Their primary idea for the play is rather charming. . . . The story of the play is pretty and simple. The scenes are nicely ordered and constructed." Beerbohm. Reviewed in Academy. June 4, 1898, 53: 611-12; Saturday Rev., June 4, 1898, 85: 744-5. Non-dramatic Works Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. Modern British drama. {See Theatre, June, 1895. 37: 346-8.) Brief statement of Pinero's theories of dramatic art. Robert Louis Stevenson, the dramatist; a lecture delivered ... to the members of the Philosophical Institution of Edinburgh . . . 24th Feb.. 1903. 35 p. O. Lond., 1903. o. p. Of considerable value not only as an estimate of Stevenson but for the author's excellent statements of the characteristics of modern dramatic art in general. Published also in Critic, Apr.. 1903. 42: 341-53, and printed separately by Critic Co.. N. Y., 1903. 15 p. O. Reviewed in Blackwood's Mag.. Apr., 1903. 173: 559-C3. Criticism Archer, William. English dramatists of today. P. Lond.. 1882. Contains section on Pinero. Real conversations — Conversation I with Mr. Arthur VV. Pinero. (See Pall Mall Mag., Feb. 2, 1901, 23:388-99.) Published also by W. Heinemann. Lond., 1904. D. 6s. (Conversation with Pinero. p. 5-28.) Beers, Henry A. English drama of todav. (See North American Rev., May, 1905, 180: 746-57.) Includes estimate of Pinero. Borsa, Mario. English stage of today. Lond.. 1908. S2.50. Includes section on Pinero with brief characterizations of some of his best plays. Pinero and the Italian stage. (.See English Illus- trated Mag., June. 1901, 25: 216-20.) (A) candid friend to Mr. A. W. Pinero. (See Theatre, July, 1893, 34: 30-4.) Attacks many of Pinero's mannerisms. 66 PIXERO Filon, Pierre Marie Augustin. English stage, being an account of tlie \'ictorian drama, tr. from the French by Frederic Why te. N. Y. 1897. $2.50. Includes chapter on Pinero giving a French estimate of his skill as a playwright. Fyfe, H. Hamilton. Arthur Wing Pinero, playwright; a study. 250 p. D. Lond., 1902. Greening & Co. Includes "bibliography of Mr. Pinero's plays," p. 231-50. Plays of Pinero as literature. {See Theatre, Dec, 1S9.5. 3.S: 324-8.) Hale, Edward Everett, Jr. Dramatists of today. 1905. Includes section on Pinero. Hamilton, J. A. Arthur Wing Pinero, {See Munsey, Dec, 1N93, 10: 247-51.) Herrmann, Oscar. Living dramatists. 1905. Opening sections deal with Pinero. Hyde, G. M. .Arthur W. Pinero, with bibliography of his plays. {See Book-buyer, Nov., 1S98, 17: 301-05.) Kobbe, Gustav. Plays of Arthur Wing Pinero. {See Forum, Sept., 1898, 26: 119-28.) Valuable for the concise characterization of the different plays mentioned. Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. Bygones. 1880. An early play, delicate in touch but too slight and conven- tional to be enduring. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Sept., 1880, 2: 410; Illustrated London News, Oct. 2, 1880, 77: 327. Daisy's escape. 1879. The heroine narrowly escapes eloping with a cad by meeting the right man at the psychological moment. A forerunner of the author's later and better farces, but with slight merit of its own. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Sept., 1879, 2: 412; Theatre, Oct., 1879, ser. 3,v. 3:164. Girls and boys. 1882. "Dramatic contrast between simplicity and worldliness." Theatre. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Nov. 1882, 2: 606; Saturday Rev., Nov. 25, 1882, 54: 700; Theatre, Dec, 1882, ser. 3, 6: 355-7. Imprudence. 1881. "An attempt to imitate the extravagant class of French pieces associated with the name of the Palais Royal. . . . More complicated than ingenious." Graphic. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., Aug. 6, 1881, 52: 171; Theatre, Sept. 1, 1881, 3d ser., 4: 74-7. Iron master. 1884. A close paraphase of "Le maitre des forges." "A strong rather than a pleasing or sympathetic work." Alhencsum. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Apr., 1884, 1: 546; Theatre. 1881. n. s., V. 2: 263-5. Lords and commons. 1883. A healthy social study, based on the Swedish Mannen af bord och gvinnan af lovel. Reviewed in Academy, Dec. 1, 1883, 24: 371-2, by F. Wedmore; Athenaeum, Dec, 1883, 2: 710; Theatre, Jan., 1884, n. s., v. 3: 1-7. Low water. 1884. A stage failure and disclaimed by its author but interesting as an example of the differences of critical opinions regarding the author. PINERO 87 Reviewed in Academy, Jan. 26, 1884, 25: 69; Athenaeum, Jan., 1884, 1: 97; Saturday Rev., Jan. 19, 1884. 57: 83; Theatre, Feb., 1884, n. s., v. 3: 86-8. Pinero, Sir Arthur Wing. Mayfair. 1885. English version of Sardous "Maison neuve." The improba- bility of the plot spoils the dialogue. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Nov., 1885, 2: 613. Rector; a story of four friends. 1883. An unsuccessful play with many good points of dialogue and character drawing. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Mar., 1883, 1: 419; Academy, Apr. 7, 1883, 23: 248. Pinero and his critics. {See Blackwood's Mag., June, I'.IOO, 167: 837-40.) Pinero and the literary drama. {See Theatre, July, 1.S93, 34: 3-8.) Pinero's skill as a dramatist. {See Nation, Sept. 6, 1906, 83: 211.) Recent English dramatists. 129 p. O. Phil., 1901. (Booklovers' library.) o. p. Includi-s criticisms of Pinero. Rideing, W. H. Some women of Pinero's. {See North American Rev., July, 1908, 188: 38-49.) Salaman, M. C. Pinero, the man and the dramatist. {See Cassell's family mag., Sept., 1899, n. s. 19: 354- 62.) Popular, illustrated sketch. Sharp, R. Farquharson. Pinero and farce. {See Theatre, Oct., 1N92, 29: 1.54-7.) Criticism of the comic elements of his earlier plays. Tarpley, W. Kingsley. English dramatists of today. {Sec Critic. Aug., 1900, 37: 117-23.) Walkley, Arthur Bingham. Drama and life. 1908. Includes criticism of several of Pinero's best plays. Lelty, His house in order, etc. Playhouse impressions. Lond., 1892. Criticisms of several of Pinero's works by a well-known dramatic critic. Waugh, Arthur. London letter. {See Critic, Feb. 24, 1S94, 24: 1:^4.) General criticism of Pinero's ability as a playwright. Wedmore, Sir Frederick. Literature and the theatre. {See Ninteenth Century, Apr. 1902. 51: 568-80.) Incidentally compares Pinero with two French contempo- raries, Becque and Hervieu. ROSTAND Rostand, Edmond. Chantecler; a play in four acts; tr. by Gertrude Hall. D. N. Y., 1910. Duffield, SI. 25. "Chantecler, sure that his song makes the sun rise, loves the beautiful hen-pheasant. She, jealous of his devotion to the dawn, tricks him into neglecting his morning song. The sun rises without it, to Chantecler's great surprise and dis- apfKjintment, but he rises superior to his disillusionment, and the pheasant in remorse risks her life to save his from a sudden danger. A strong social satire in the symbolic form of a barn- yard drama." Reviewed in Bookman. Oct., 1910. 32: 154-5; Mar., 1911. 33: 19-27; Book News, Oct., 1910. 29: 85-91; Current Litera- ture, Mar., 1911, 50: 313-15; Delineator. Feb., 1911, 97: 94. 159-60; Dial, Aug. 16, 1910. 49: 84; Independent, Feb. 23. 1911, 70: 406-07; Literary Digest, Feb. 4, 1911. 42: 208-09; Nation, Sept. 15, 1910, 91: 249; Munsey. Mar.. 1911. 44: 871- 2; Outlook, Oct. 29. 1910, 96: 575; Feb. 4, 1911, 97: 251-2; Libermer, M. F.. Story of Chantecler. 97 p. D. N. Y.. 1910. Moffatt. 75c. Cyrano de Bergerac; a play in five acts; tr. from the French by Gladys Thomas and M. F. Guillemard. 294 p. D. N. Y.. 1900. Russell, $1. A romantic play of high literary and histrionic value. Of the translations this in blank verse is perhaps the best. N. Y. State Library, Bulletin of Best Books. Cyrano de Bergerac; an heroic comedy in five acts; tr. from the French by Charles Renauld, with an intro- duction by Adolphe Cohn. 233 p. D. N. Y., cl898. Stokes, 50c. Cyrano de Bergerac; tr. from the French by Ger- trude Hall. 235 p. S. N. Y.. 1898. Doubleday. 50c. Reviewed in Archer, William, Study and stage, 1899, p. 44-50; Crawford, V. M., Studies in foreign literature, 1899. p. 27-48; Poet-lore. Jan.-Mar.. 1899. 11: 118-24; Nine- teenth Cent., July, 1898, 44: 102-15. by Stanley Young; Athenaeum, Apr. 28, 1900, 1 : 538 (Rev. of the Ogilvie & Parker translation) ; Forum, Dec, 1898,26: 502-12, by Gustave Kobbe; Saturday Rev., 86: 42; 89: 524, by Max Beerbohm; National Mag., 9: 471, Coquelin's French version of the play, by P. S. Vimbert; Bookman, Dec, 1899. 11: 363-6. by Paul Wilstach. Scribner's Mo.. Nov., 1908, 44: 533-41. by P. Wilstach. Cyrano, Rostand, Coquelin. {See Current Literature, July, 1900. 29: 26-7.) Extract from Eliot Gregory's Reading from the Ways of Men. Rostand, Edmond. (The) Fantasticks; a romantic comedy in three acts; freely done into English verse by George Fleming. 150 p. D. N. Y. Heinemann, 2s. 6d. La Princesse Lointaine (The princess Far-away); a play in four acts in verse; tr. into English verse with a preface by Charles Renauld. 110 p. D. N. Y., cl899. Stokes. 50c. A poor translation. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., June 22, 1895, 79: 828-9. by G. B. Shaw. 58 ROSTAND 59 Rostand, Edmond. L'Aiglon; a play in six acts; adapted into English by L. N. Parker. 2G1 p. O. N. Y., 1900. Russell, SI. 50. This tragedy, with its poor, weak little hero (the young king of Rome, son of Napoleon I), its frivolity and its de- cadent circumstance, makes a stronger effect than Cyrano — stronger even though less obvious. Reviewed in Adrich, T. B., Note on L'Aiglon. (See his Ponkapog papers. 1903. p. 73-81); Athenaium, Mar. 17, 1900, 1: 334-5, by Jules Claretie; June 8. 1901, 1: 735; Nation, May 10. 1900, 70: 356-7; Feb. 7, 1901, 72: 114. The romancers; a comedy in three acts; tr. by Mary Hendee. 134 p. S. N. Y.. 1899. Doubleday. 50c. net. "Scene is laid in a bright garden of flowers and trees, with- out regard to special time or place. Fanciful, jesting, and gay — a merry burlesque of the scheme of Romeo and Juliet." A. Henderson. "A remarkable play in execution." Jules Lemaitre. Reviewed in Athenaeum, June 2, 1900, 1 : 699. Criticism (The) case against Rostand. (.See Bookman, Nov., 1910, 32: 217-18.) Chesterton, Gilbert Keith. Rostand. (See his Varied types. 1903. p. 73-82.) For reviews see G. K. Chesterton entry under Maeterlinck. Filon, Augustin. [P. M.] Modern French drama, seven essays, tr. by J. E. Hogarth, with an introd. by W. L. Courtney. 304 p. D. Lond., 1898. Chapman, 7s. 6d. Reprinted from Fortnightly Rev., July, 1898, 70: 98-114. Chapter 7 is a criticism of Cyrano de Bergerac with a few personal notes on the original Cyrano and Rostand himself. Hapgood, Norman. Rostand. (See his Stage in America, 1897-1900. 1901. p. 249-78.) Criticism of Rostand's plays and the acting of them. Henderson, Archibald. The theatre of Edmond Ros- tand. {See Arena, Sept., 1905, 34: 225-.34.) Full and informing criticism, but extravagant in praise. A good portrait of Rostand accompanies the article. Howells, William Dean. The new poetic drama. (See North American Rev., May. 1901. 172: 794-800.) Comparison of Rostand with Stephen Phillips. James, Henry. Edmond Rostand. (See Critic, Nov., 1901, 39: 437-50.) A broad-minded and penetrative analysis. Published also in Cornhill Mag., 84: 577-98. Master of great plays. (See Outlook. Nov. 27, 1909, 93: 663-5.) Brief sketch of Rostand's work, with portrait. M. Edmond Rostand. (See Critic, Oct., 1901, 39: 299.) A brief, personal sketch with a full length, highly char- acteristic portrait. and the literary prospects of the drama. (See Edinburgh Rev., July-Q£t-. 1900, 192: 307-21.) Analyzes five of his plays, and indicates their literary spirit. MoSett, Cleveland. The author of Cyrano; a study of Edmond Rostand's personality and methods of writing. (See McClure's Mag., Mar., 1900, 14: 4.37-45.) \ personal sketch; a talk with Coquelin and Rostand; how Cyrano was written. CO ROSTAND On displaying celebrities. (See Nation. June 25, 1903, 76: 510-11.) Account of Rostand's reception into the French Academy. Representations of Christ on the American stage. (See Current Literature. Feb.. 1911, 50: 193-6.) Extended note on La Samaritaine, with extracts from the play, and comparison with the similar plays of Maeterlinck. Rostand, Edmond. (La) Samaritaine. A novel but reverent treatment of the Scriptural story, similar to and yet unlike Maeterlinck's Mary Magdalene. Reviewed in Bookman, Feb.. 1911, 23: 002-04; Current Literature, Feb.. 1911. 50: 193-6; Literary Digest. Dec. 24, 1910, 41: 1203. Sedgwick, EUery. M. Edmond Rostand. (See Atlantic Mo.. Dec. 1898, 82: 826-33.) Slight biographical and critical sketch. Readable yet hardly more than a surface criticism of the plays. SHAW Shaw, George Bernard. Plays, pleasant and unpleasant. 2 V. D. X. v., I'JUU. Brentano, S2.50. Published also by Constable. Lend. 2v. 10s. 6d., and sepa- rately at 2s. net each. "A delight to the intellectual, a mockery to the brainless, a confusion to those who, having brains, cannot use them." Baltimore Sun. In the preface of each volume Shaw expounds in a his- torical and highly personal way his views as to the relation between the players and the play. Contents: — V. 1. The unpleasant plays: Widowers' houses. The philanderer. Mrs. Warren's profession. V. 2. The pleasant plays: — You never can tell. Arms and the man. Candida. The man of destiny. Reviewed in Dial, July 16. 1898. 25: 43-5, by E. E. Hale, Jr.; Nation, July 14, 1898, 67: 36-7; Athenaeum, May 28. 1898, 1: 703-4; Bookman, July, 1898, 7: 416-17, by Paul Wilstach; Academy, 53: 461-3; 490-2; 613-14; Bookbuyer, July, 1898, 26: 503-5. by J. R. Sullivan. Doctor's dilemma; Getting married; and The shew- ing up of Blanco Posnet. 535 p. D. N. Y., 1911. Brentano, $1.50. First two published also by Constable, Lond., 6s. Three plays each preceded by a characteristic preface. The first preface deals with the medical profession and vivisection; the second with the marriage question; the third, freedom of the drama and stage censorship. Reviewed in Forum, Mar., 1911, 45: 334-54, by Temple Scott. — — John Bull's other island and Major Barbara. Sq. D. X. Y.. 1907. Brentano. S1.50. Published also by Constable, Lond., 6s. Includes also How he lied to her husband. Has char- acteristic prefaces to each play and, as an introduction, the author's "First aid to critics." Reviewed in Academy, June 29, 1907, 72: 621; Athenaeum, July 27. 1907. 2: 107; Independent. Oct. 10, 1907, 63: 879; North American Rev., Oct., 1907, 186: 284-8; Outlook, July 20, 1907, 86: 610; Review of Rev.. Sept.. 1907. 36: 386. Three plays for Puritans; being a third volume of his collected plays. 315 p. D. N. Y., 1906. Brentano, $1.25. "This volume is not edifying, but it is entertaining; and what is more, if you have never read a play, or if, having read one. you regretted the effort, the present volume will be a revelation." Baltimore Sun. Contents: — Devil's disciple. Caesar and Cleopatra. Captain Brassbound's conversion. 61 62 SHAW Reviewed in Dial. May 16. 1901, 30: 343; Nation, June 6, 1901, 72: 400; Literary World, Aug. 1, 1901, 32: 12G; Saturday Rev., Jan. 2C. 1901. 91: 107-8. by Max Beerbohm; Athenaeum, Feb. 9, 1901, 1: 186-7; Spectator. Apr. 13. 1901. 86: 634-6. Shaw, George Bernard. Arms and the man. Scene is kiid in a Bulgarian mountain hotel in 1885. "Amus- ingly iconoclastic with Mr. Shaw's notion of conventional heroism as its target." For review of comic opera The Chocolate Soldier (by M. Bernauer and 1. Jacobson with music by O. Strauss) founded on Arms and the man, see Academy, Sept. 17, 1910, 79: 278; Illustrated London News, Sept. 17. 1910. 137: 410; Saturday Rev., Sept. 17, 1910. 110: 355. Caesar and Cleopatra. Setting is on the Syrian border of Egypt toward the end of the 23d dynasty. A study of antiquity, humorous and truth-telling, and tending to be both real and fantastic. Candida. A comedy of more depth than others of the "mere plays" in the "plays pleasant." The characterization is varied. The clergyman and Candida herself are particularly true studies, the former being the exponent of Christian socialist idealism. Reviewed in Walkley, A. B., Drama and life. 1908. p. 214- 18; London Times, Apr. 30, 1904, p. 133; Athensum, Apr. 30, 1904. 1: 570; Academy, May 7. 1904, 66: 528. Captain Brassbound's conversion. The author claims to have stolen "the scenery, atmos- phere and knowledge of the East" from Cunningham Grahame's Morocco the Most Holy. A farce so bound to tickle the humor of the reader that he forgets to be dissatisfied with its cynicism. The devil's disciple. Published also separately by Constable, Load., 1906. 88 p. D. 2s. In the preface, "On Diabolian ethics," the author refers to this as "the novelty of the advanced thought of rny day — a play certain to be written at the end of the nineteenth century." It has some tragic situations mingled with mali- cious, roistering humor. Doctor's dilemma. A satire on the medical profession. Various types of doc- tors, old-school, new-school, surgeons and quacks serve to show the confusion of medical science. Reviewed in Walkley. A. B., Drama and life. 1908. p. 239- 44; Forum, Mar., 1911, 45: 343-6, by Temple Scott. Getting married. "The whole subject of marriage as it is understood and prac- tised at present is exemplified in several ways and discussed and turned into ridicule." Temple Scott. Reviewed in Forum, Mar., 1911, 45: 346-50, by Temple Scott. How he lied to her husband. "Admittedly a jeux d'esprit, this barefaced and indubitably 'original' little farce is as preposterously veracious and as iin- mensely telling as anything that he has done, trifle though it is; and it is full ... of vivid and irresistible divinations of character. ' ' Laurence Gilman. John Bull's other island. The action arises from the opposition of English and Irish types and conditions. Both nations are impartially treated both as to their merits and their weaknesses. Shows com- plete contempt of conventional dramatic technique. SHAW 63 Reviewed in Walkley, A. B., Drama and life. 1908. p. 219- 23. Borsa. Mario. English drama of today. 1908. p. 156-60. Shaw, George Bernard. Man of destiny. An original one-act complication in which Napoleon, lead- ing the French army into Italy in 1796, Quarters himself at a little inn and at a Milanese repast carries on a very engrossing dialogue with "The Lady." Shaw makes Napoleon a mouth- piece with which he lectures Englishmen in his own whimsical fashion. Reviewed in Bookman, Apr., 1904, 19: 160, by F. M. Colby. Major Barbara. The central figure is a girl of good family who has become an officer in the Salvation Army without losing touch with her relatives. The most extreme theories of social reform are thrown together in one confused jumble. "As a study of actual social conditions or as drama quite worthless . . . but entertaining, paradoxical and irrespon- sible." Reviewed in Walkley, A. B., Drama and life, 1908. p., 233- 8; Current Literature. Feb., 1906. 40: 191-3; Aug., 1907, 43: 193-8; Nation, July 4, 1907. 84: 19; Saturday Rev.. Aug. 28, 1909, 108: 254. Mrs. Warren's profession. Based on the Socialists' plea that the necessary result of poverty is vice. Unpleasant as are all the convincing argu- ments to those who would rather shut their eyes and ears than be convinced and convicted, it is nevertheless made entertaining by the charm of the characters. Frank, "the good-for-nothing." is especially delightful. Structurally the interest is held by the brilliancy of the dialogue rather than by action, and surprise is substituted for climax. Reviewed in Saturday Rev., 1898, 85: 651, 679, by Max Beerbohm; Westminster Rev., Mar., 1902. 157: 344-7. Author's apology; from Mrs. Warren's profession; with an introd. by John Corbin. 67 p. S. N. Y., 1905. Brentano, paper. 60c. net. (The) Philanderer. This play points out the fact that certain usages of society are being outgrown — for instance, marriage in its present form. But as no practical substitute is suggested, the point is weakened. It loses prominence also through the develop- ment of the humorous situations wherein lies the chief merit of the play. Incidental is a subtle attack on vivisection. As a whole it is slightly tragic and very amusing. Reviewed in Walkley, A. B., Drama and life, 1908. p. 245- 50. Shewing up of Blanco Posnet. A moral conflict between Posnet and the Almighty in which Posnet is brought to see God's purposes in the suffering and mental agony he has undergone. "Forbidden by the censor in England, because it was considered blasphemous and immoral." Reviewed in Forum, Mar., 1911, 45: 334-54; Saturday Rev., Aug. 28, 1909, 108: 254. Widowers' houses. Middle class respectability and younger son gentility fattening on the poverty of the slum as flies fatten on filth." is the way Shaw puts it. His own feeling on the subject is so strong that his irony becomes too bitter to be entertaining and the didactic trend encumbers the dramatic power with the result that the whole is rather ineffectual. The characters are nearly all "villains" and are treated in an unnatural and old-fashioned style. You never can tell. A successful comedy with a theme that is both droll and complex, but realistically developed. The characters make but a feeble impression, except i>erhaps that of an eldi-rly 64 SHAW waiter who, in the farcical ending, dances through the hotel rooms with a young lady who is saucy, pert and in some ways delightful. Reviewed in Athenaeum, May 12, 1901, 1: 603. Works Published Separately Shaw, George Bernard. Cashel Byron's profession . . . also, The adiiiirablc Bashville; or, Constancy unre- warded; being the novel of Cashel Byron's profession done into a stage play in three acts and blank verse. 376 p. D. N. Y., 1906. Brentano, $1.50. An exceedingly clever and ruthlessly disagreeable eluci- dation of a phase of life generally avoided. Cashel Byron is a prize fighter, a champion light-weight, well-born and clean- minded. A young woman, rich, refined and bookish, falls helplessly in love with him and marries him in desperate defiance of social laws. Reviewed in Critic, Feb., 1902, 40: 179; Saturday Rev., Nov. 2, 1901, 92: 550, by Ma.x Beerbohm. Man and superman; a comedy and a philosophy. 244 p. D. N. Y.. 1904. Brentano. $1.25 net. Published also by Constable, Lond., 6s. A clever, satirical play which is made the vehicle of a very daring theory of social life, matrimony, and the development of the "superman." Reviewed in Athenaeum, Sept. 26, 1903, 2: 422-3, by William Archer; Spectator, Nov. 21, 1903, 91: 840-1; Dial, July 16, 1903, 37: 33-4, by A. Henderson; Nation. Dec. 15, 1904, 79: 486; Critic, Oct., 1903, 43: 310-12, by William Archer; Aug.. 1904, 45: 186-7, by O. H. Dunbar; Bookman, Aug., 1903. 19: 609-10, bv F. M. Colby; Blackwood's Edinburgh Mag.. Oct., 1903, 174: 532-4. Dramatic opinions and essays; containing ... a word on the dramatic opinions and essays of G. Ber- nard Shaw, by James Huneker. 2 v. D. N. Y.. 1906. Brentano, S2.50 net. Published also by Constable. Lond. 10s. 6d. "Selections from dramatic criticisms which appeared in the London Saturday Review, 1895-8. A combination of acute and searching criticism of modern plays and players with unlimited flippancy and egotism. Deliciously entertaining, if not altogether profitable, reading for those familiar with the plays and the actors." A. L. A. Booklist. (The) Perfect Wagnerite. Constable. Lond.. 3s. 6d. Quintessence of Ibsenism. Ed. 2. 170 p. D. N. Y., 1891. Brentano, SI. This book, short as it is, affords the best key we have to Shaw's doctrine. Criticism An Irish bull in the china shop. (See Independent, Nov. 2. 1905, 59: 1060-1.) Editorial on Shaw and prudish "Comstockery." Archer, William. Mr. Bernard Shaw's plays. (See his Study and stage — a year-book of criticism. 1899. p. 1-22.) Balanced criticism and praise by a well-known theatrical critic. Barnicoat, Constance A. Mr. Bernard Shaw's counter- feit presentment of women. (See Fortnightly Rev., Mar., 1906, 85: 516-27.) SHAW 65 A match for Shaw in clever audacity. She quotes freely to illustrate his various methods of constructing woman's nature. Published also in Living Age. Apr., 1906, 249: 67-75. Beers, Henry A. The English drama of today. (See North American Rev., May, 1905, ISO: 740-57.) Shaw, Phillips, Yeats and others are considered with rather secondary critical treatment. Borsa, Mario. G. B. S. (See his EngUsh drama of today. 1908. p. 120-66.) "Shaw's dramatic work is pure journalism, destined to enjoy a certain vogue and then to be swallowed up in the deep pit of oblivion." Includes brief analyses of several of Shaw's best known plays. ' Gary, Elizabeth Luther. Apostles of the new drama. (See Lamp, Jan., 1904, 27: 593-8.) These apostles are W. B. Yeats and G. B. Shaw. Chesterton, Gilbert Keith. Mr. Bernard Shaw. (.See his Heretics. 1905. p. 54-61.) George Bernard Shaw. 249 p. D. N. Y., 1909. Lane, $1.50. "Sketch of the man and criticism of his works written . . . by one 'who is kindly disposed toward Mr. Shaw personally but who does not take his ideas altogether seriously.' " Book Rev. Digest. Paradoxical and clever, it treats its subject with a candor and lack of respect not unlike Shaw's own treatment of other writers. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Sept. 11, 1909, 2: 291; Bookman. Sept., 1909. 36: 270-1; Catholic World. Nov., 1909, 90: 244; Current Literature. 47: 528-31; Dial. Oct. 16, 1909, 47: 280; Nation, Oct. 21, 1909, 89: 375; Outlook, Nov. 13, 1909, 93: 574; Saturday Rev., Sept. 4, 1909, 108: 290. Chilton, C. B. Shaw contra mundum. (5ee Independent, Mar. S. 190G, 60: 550-6.) Deacon, Renee M. Bernard Shaw as artist-philosopher; an exposition of Shavianism. 106 p. D. N. Y., 1910. Lane, SI. "A sort of student's primer of Shavian philosophy, in which Mr. Shaw's dramatic theory, conception of life, and artistic function are laid down with an uncritical admiration." Dial. Reviewed in Dial, Oct. 16, 1910, 49: 283; Independent, Oct. 6, 1910, 69: 775. France, Wilmer Cave. Philosophy of George Bernard Shaw. (See Bookman, June, 1905, 21: 428-31.) Brief, but well summarized. George Bernard Shaw, an enquiry. (See Academy, Feb. 9, 1901, 60: 127-8.) Reply by P^lorence Norman in Academy, Mar. 2, 1901, 00: 192-3. Grendon, Felix. Some misconceptions concerning Shaw. (See Poet-lore, Sept.-Oct., 1909. 20: 376-88.) An extreme euloRy, not a criticism. Hamon, Augustin. Un noveau Moliere. (See Nine- teenth Century, July. 1908, 64: 48-63.) A French view of Shaw. Asserts that he is at his best in comedy and that in his intellectual make-up he is more French than English. Henderson, Archibald. Arnold Daly and Bernard Shaw; a bit of dramatic history. (See Arena, Nov., 1904, 32: 489-96.) Philosophy of Shaw. (See Atlantic Mo., Feb., 1909, 103: 227-37.) 66 SHAW Discusses Shaw as a socialist and social evolutionist. Appre- ciative in tone. Is Bernard Shaw a menace to morals? {See Current literature, Nov., 1905, 39: 551-2.) Some discussion provoked by the comments of Mr. A. E. Bostwick of the New York Public Library on circulating Shaw's books. Jackson, Holbrook. Bernard Shaw; a study and an appreciation. 2:i3 p. D. Phil., 1907. Jacobs, $1.50. (Lond., Richards, 6s.) "I am not playing the part of commentator, but of interpreter. My one aim is to induce people to refuse Shaw on any but first- hand terms — to read him." Preface. Contents: — The man. The Fabian. The playwright. The philosopher. Reviewed in Atheneeum, Sept. 28, 1907, 2: 376; Dial, Nov. 16, 1907. 43: .321; Literary Digest, Oct. 19, 1907, 35: 578; Nation, Oct. 10. 1007. So: 334. Loraine, Robert. Where does Shaw leave you? (See Cosmopolitan, Jan., 1906, 40: 339-44.) Lewis, Austin. The Nemesis of Bernard Shaw. (See Overland Mo., Oct., 1905, 61: 369-71.) Mr. Lewis is a socialistic writer of San Francisco and a friendly commentator who considers Shaw a man who has failed to "make good." The point of view of Bernard Shaw. (See Overland Mo., Jan.. 1904, 58: 43-6.) Mencken, Henry Louis. George Bernard Shaw, his plavs; a critical analysis of all Shaw's literary and dramatic work. 107 p. D. Bost., 1905. Luce, $1. Reviewed in Nation, Feb. 1, 1906, 82: 103-4. Well written and informing. Mr. Mencken is, obviously, an admirer of Shaw, but he is no mere idolater. His book comprises an essay on Shaw as a dramatist which is remark- ably comprehensive in its scope, and perhaps open to argu- ment as to its doctrine. But it is good reading. Then follow chapters descriptive and amiably critical on Shaw's plays. Mosley, J. K. Modern attacks on Christian ethics. (See Contemporary Rev., Apr., 1908, 93: 422-35.) Same article in Living Age, May 9, 1908, 257: 358-62. Discusses Shaw's views on state supervision of children and the marriage relation. Norman, Florence. George Bernard Shaw. (See Academy, Mar. 2, 1901, 60: 192-3.) Reply to an article entitled, "George Bernard Shaw, an Enquiry," that appeared in Academy, Feb. 9, 1901, 60: 127-8. Plays of Mr. Bernard Shaw. (See Edinburgh Rev., 1905,201:498-523.) „ . An acceptable study of all the published collections of Shaw's plays. Treats him seriously as a dramatist of genius and an earnest reformer. Rogers, A. K. Bernard Shaw's philosophy. (See Hib- bert-Journal, July. 1910, 8: 818-37.) Walkley, Arthur Bingham. George Bernard Shaw. (See his Frames of mind, 1899.) Rcview^ed in Athenfrum, Jan. 13, 1900, 1: 40. (The) yellow dramatist. (See Outlook, Nov. 25, 1905, 81: 701.) ^ , Shaw, George Bernard. Dark lady of the sonnets. A burlesque "interlude" on a Shakespearean subject treated with the author's characteristic lack of reverence. Reviewed in Academy, Dec. 3. 1910, 79: 543-4; Current Literature, Feb., 1911, 50: 196; Literary Digest, Dec. 17, 1910. 41: 1155. SUDERMANN Sudermann, Hermann. Fires of St. John, a drama in four acts; tr. and adapted by Charles Swickard. 139 p. O. Bost.. 1904. Luce. SI. 25. An old German peasant custom of lighting bonfires and dancing around them on St. John's eve is used as an alle- gorical background for this romantic drama. The custom symbolizes "the outburst in the human soul, after Christian centuries, of the wild yearnings and primeval passions of unregenerate man." One follows the plot with the feeling that it is an unsatisfactory play with a conclusion that is unforgivable. Fires of St. John, a drama in four acts; tr. from the German by Charlotte Porter and H. C. Porter. (5e« Poet-lore, Jan.-Mar., 1904, 15: 1-71.) Published also separately by R. Badger. Bost., 1911. $1.50. St. John's fire; tr. from the German by G. E. Polk. 108 p. O. Minneapolis, 1905. Wilson, SI. "Miss Polk's translation is at once faithful to the spirit of the original and to the idiom of our own tongue. It is neither slavish nor careless." M. G. Peck. Reviewed in Outlook. May 27, 1905, 80: 247; Review of Reviews, July. 1905, 32: 127. Johannes; [a play in five acts] tr. from the German by W. H. Harned and Mary Harned. (See Poet-lore, Apr.-June, 1899, 11: 161-236.) A tragedy of great dramatic and religious interest. The Jewish prophet, in struggling for a Christ ideal too visionary and austere for his human followers, becomes disenchanted with himself and tragically falls. In the fall he awakens to his weak hold on the power of Love. The Gospel story is enlarged to show the psychological purpose of the play. There is lack of unity in the whole and the main lines are common- place and conventional. Reviewed in Francke, Kuno, Sudermann's John the Bap- tist. (See his Glimpses of modern German culture. 1898. p. 142-53.) John the Baptist: a play, tr. by Beatrice Marshall. 201 p. D. N. Y., 1908. Lane, Sl.oO. Reviewed in Athenaeum, Jan. 9, 1909, 1: 52; Nation, Dec. 24, 1908. 87: 636. (The) Joy of living ... a play~-in five acts; tr. from the German by Edith Wharton. 185 p. D. N. Y., 1903. Scribner, SI. 25 net. Published also by Heinemann, Lond. 4s. 6d. The well-drawn characters typify the Berlinese aristoc- racy who live in an environment wholly political. The truthful art of the author brings his message and psychology before our minds brutally "as it is." He would have us see that there are personalities — such as the one typified in the high-minded Beata — so big that they can beg reasons for transcending moral laws. The point of the title is the proposal of a '"Toast to life" by the guilty Beata herself at the moment when her own self-inflicted death is near. The fine workmanship of the play and the opportunities it offers for artistic interpretation have given it great stage success. 67 68 SUDERMANN Reviewed in Poet-lore, Jan.-Mar., 1903. 14: 114-20, by P. H. Grummann; Apr.-June, 1903, 14: 5-11, by H.A. C; Nation, Feb. 27, 1902, 74: 169-70. by Charles Harris; Fortnightly Rev.. Sept., 1902. 78: 429-40. by W. S. Lilly; Athenaeum. Feb. 28. 1903. 1: 283; July 4. 1903. 2: 38; July 18, 1903, 2: 103. Sudermann, Hermann. Magda, a play in four acts; tr. from the German by C. E. A. Winslow. 161 p. D. Bost., 1895. Lamson, 50c. net. Published also by S. French. N. Y.. 50c. Pre-eminently a study of character and environment, offering, in the characters of Schwartzc and his outcast daugh- ter Magda. a contrast between provincial and cosmopolitan ideals, the petty narrowness of the one and the irresponsible lawlessness of the other. The Pastor, the real hero of the play, represents the true sanity, order and law of life. Technically perfect as an acting drama it is also an intensely interesting one to read. Reviewed in Poet-lore, Oct.-Dec, 1896, 8: 557-63; Atlantic Mo., Jan.. 1898, 81: 71-80, by J. F. Coar. Morituri; three one-act plays: Teja; Fritzchen; The eternal masculine. Tr. by Archibald Alexander. 159 p. D. N. Y., 1910. Scribner. $1.25. "The English of the translation is far from faultless." The famous Morituri group is closely related to the best of the author's work as a whole. Reviewed in Dial. Dec. IG, 1910, 49: 522. Morituri: Teias; tr. by Mary Harned. {See Poet- lore, July-Sept., 1897, 9: 330-52.) Morituri: (The) eternal masculine. "A satire . . . has a court setting and concerns the love of a queen for an artist. When he declares his love she turns against him for his presumption and asks another lover, the marshal, to despatch him. An amusing denouement disallu- sions all three." Book Review Digest. Morituri: Fritzchen. "Tragic story of a young German whose father advises him to see life before he settles down. This he does, becomes involved in an affair with another man's wife, is challenged by the husband to a duel and brings home to his father the terrible result of his suggestion before he goes forth to certain death." Book Review Digest. Roses; four one-act plays: Streaks of light; the last visit; Margot; the Far-away princess; tr. from the German bv Grace Frank. 186 p. D. N. Y., 1909. Scribner. $1.25. "Presents four one-act plays, one of which is a pleasant comedy of a young student and a princess incognita. . . . The other three plays are studies of feminine pathology of the most pronounced type." Outlook. "The first of the plays is a frankly repulsive study, and the second is distressingly pathetic. 'The last visit' is more human and also more dramatic. The last play is wholly charming." N. Y. Times, Oct. 13. 1909. Reviewed in Independent. Oct. 21. 1909, 67: 932; Nation, Oct. 14, 1909, 89: 364; Outlook, Nov. 6. 1909. 93: 558. Teja. A one-act drama in one brief scene. Gloomy in theme, it shows the stern Ostrogothic character as the king and his people face death from starvation and an encircling enemy. (The) three heron's feathers; tr. by H. T. Porter. (See Poet-lore. Apr.-June. 1900. 12: 161-234.) An unsuccessful venture away from the use of prose and naturalistic construction into the employment of poetic artifice and the fairy tale. Allegorical and fanciful, the SUDERMANN 69 drama is intended to symbolize the same restless cravings of the same emotional idealist that Hauptmann symbolizes, but with more beauty, in The Sunken Bell. Reviewed in Francke, Kuno, German ideals of today. 1907. p. 249-57. Criticism Coar, J. Firman. Three contemporary German drama- tists. {See Atlantic Mo., Jan., 1898, 81: 71-80.) .\ comparison of Sudermann, Hauptmann and Wilden- brucli. Florer, Warren Washburn. Recent German criticism; Hermann Sudermann. {See Poet-lore, Sept., 1905, 16: 116-23.) Heller, Otto. Studies in modern German literature: Sudermann, Hauptmann, women writers of the 19th century. 301 p. D. Bost., 1905. Ginn, S1.25. Distinctly popular essays indicating, in a way adapted to readers who have little first-hand information, the chief aspects of the work of Sudermann, Hauptmann and some minor women writers. The critic, while not great, is always sensible and genuinely interested and interesting. He shows his high estimate of the two great dramatists in an unduly favorable and somewhat too detailed analysis of their plays, arranged in chronological order. Reviewed in Athenffium, Nov. 18, 1905, 2: 685; Poet-lore, Sept., 1905, IG: 127-8. Jones, Dora M. Plays of Hermann Sudermann. {See Westminster Rev., Nov., 1900, 154: 553-60.) A general characterization, slight in substance and value. Lee, Elizabeth. German drama of to-day- {See Living Age, 2.34, 156-66.) Discussion of Hauptmann and Sudermaim as representatives of modern German drama. Meyer, Edward Stockton. Modern German drama. {See Critic, July, 1905, 47: 61-70.) Treats of the features of German naturalism as developed in Sudermann and Hauptmann. Meyer, Richard M. Hermann Sudermann. {See Inter- national Mo.. 1902, 6: 140-54.) Biographical and critical. Fair and to the point. Phelps, William Lyon. Hermann Sudermann. {See his Essays on modern novelists. 1910. Macmillan, $1.50. p. 132-58.) Discusses Sudermann's fiction rather than his dramas. Steiner, Edward A. Two German dramatists. {See Outlook, Jan. 5, 1901, 67: 74-7.) Based on personal visits to Sudermann and Hauptmann, and condensed into a brief analysis of a few stage plays. Strang, Lewis C. Sudermann and Maeterlinck. {See his Players and plays of the last quarter century. 1903. V. 2. p. 259-71.) A concise biographical and critical sketch. Wells, Benjamin Willis. Hermann Sudermann. {See Forum, Nov., 1898, 26: 374-84.) A biographical and critical sketch of Sudermann by the author of "Modern German Literature." Of the plays men- tioned in this list Mr. Wells considers two — Magda and Johannes (John tlie Baptist). Witkowski, Georg. Hermann Sudermann. {See his German drama of the nineteenth century. 1909. p. 152-61.) Treats especially of Sudermann's skill in stage technique. Part II MODERN OPERAS by FANNY ELSIE MARQUAND B. A. (Wellesley), B. L. S. (N. Y. State Library School) DEBUSSY Debussy, Claude Achille, 1862-. Debussy's songs. (in Mus. Cour. v. 42, no. 23. June 5, 1901. p. 7.) — — Claude Debussy, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 24. June 11, 1902. p. 11-12.) Work of Debussy, (in Harp. W. 49. Mar. 4, '05. p. 337.) Oilman. Lawrence. Poet and dreamer, (in Harp. W. 50. Mar. 31, '06. p. 452.) Melody lacking in Debussy's works, (in Mus. Amer. v. 4, no. 14. Aug. 18, 1906. p. 14.) Gilman, Lawrence. Claude Debussy, poet and dreamer, (in No. Amer. Rev. v. 183, Nov., 1906. p. 877-86.) Gilman, Lawrence. Debussy. (in his Music of tomorrow. 1907. p. l(>-46.) Gilman, Lawrence. Debussy's The sea. (in Harp. W. 51. Mar. 23, '07. p. 438.) Debussy and the music of tomorrow, (in Cur. Lit. V. 43. Aug., 1907. p. 198-9.) Review of Gilman, Lawrence. Music of tomorrow. Por- trait of Debussy from painting by J. Blanch. Debussy. (in Nation, v. 86. Mar. 5, 1908'. p. 223-4.) Review of Liebich, Mrs. Franz. Claude Achille Debussy. — Liebich, Mrs. Franz. Claude Achille Debussy. 92 p. Lane. 1908. Review Athenaeum v. 132. Aug. 1, 1908. p. 134-5. Spec- tator V. 100. Feb. 29, 1908. p. 339-40. Bauer, E. F. Debussy talks of his music, (in Harp. W. 52: 32. Aug. 29, '08.) — Gilman, Lawrence. Debussy, (in his Aspects of modern opera. 1909. p. 143-215.) Keeton, A. E. Debussy: his science and his music. (in 19th Cent. v. 66. Sept., 1909. p. 492-502.) Same as article in Liv. Age. v. 263. Oct. 30, 1909. p. 270-8. — Biographical sketch with portrait. (in Etude. V. 28. Nov., 1909. p. 735-6.) Portrait, (in Etude 28, Nov., 1909. p. 735-6; Gaz. d. Beaux Arts. 1903. ser. 3, v. 29. p. 453; 111. Lond. N. V. 134. Mar. 20, 1909. p. 419; 111. Lond. N. v. 134. May 29, 1909. p. 798; Internat. Stud. v. 21, p. 199. 1904: Put. Mo. v. 4. Apr. 1908. p. 124; Mus. Cour. V. 60, no. 16. Apr. 20, 1910. p. 8.) Pelleas and Melisande. Debussy, C. A. Pelleas and Melisande; Drame lyrique en 5 actes and 12 tableau.x de Maurice Maeterlinck. 409 p. Par E. Fremont. C1904. The full score; to be found in the Library of Congress. Archer, William. Pelleas and Melisande. (in his Study of the stage. 1899. p. 133-7.) Review of the play. 73 74 DEBUSSY Pelleas and Melisande. Gilman. Lawrence. De- bussy's Pcllcas and Melisande; a guide to the opera, with musical examples from the score. 84 p. il. D. N. Y. Schirmer, 1907. Krehbiel, E: H: Pelleas and Melisande. (in his Chapters of opera. 1909. p. 393-7.) Melitz, Leo. Pelleas and Melisande. (in his Opera-goers' complete guide. 1909. p. 292-7.) Singleton, Esther. Pelleas and Melisande. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 243-58.) Hale, E. E., jr. The antennae in poetry, (in Dial. V. 18. Mar. 1895. p. 174-5.) Review of the play. Pelleas and Melisande. (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 21. May 21, 1902. p. 11.) Pelleas and Melisande in Paris, (in Mus. Cour. V. 44, no. 22. May 28, 1902. p. 17-18.) Pelleas and Melisande. (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 3. July 16, 1902. p. 10.) Pelleas and Melisande. (in Mus. Cour, v. 45, no. 4, p. 18. July 23, '98.) The individual art of Claude Debussy, as shown in Pelleas and Melisande. (in Mus. Amer. v. 6, no. 22. Oct. 12, 1907. p. 16.) Van Vechten, Carl. The coming opera season, il. (in Bkman. v. 26. Nov., 1907. p. 256-65.) Oilman's guide to Pelleas and Melisande. (in Nation, v. 85. Dec. 26, 1907. p. 595.) Review. Gilman, Lawrence. Debussy's Pelleas and Meli- sande. il. (in Harp. W. v. 52. Mar. 7, 1908. p. 25.) Concerning an epoch making score, (in Harp. W. v. 52. Mar. 21, 1908. p. 25.) A drama of decoration. (in Outlook. v. 88. Mar. 28, 1908. p. 673-4.) Musical significance of Pelleas and Melisande. il. (in Cur. Lit. v. 44. Apr., 1908. p. 426-9.) Partly a rev. of Gilman's book and quoting Gilman in Harp, w., Krehbiel in Tribune, DeKoven in World, Finck in Ev. Post and H. T. Parker in Bost. Transcript. 2 ill. Miss Garden as Melisande; M. Pener as Pelleas. Appreciation of Pelleas and Melisande. il. (in Theatre, v. 8. Apr., 1908. p. 112-14.) Production at Manhattan Opera House. (in Theatre, v. 9. Feb., 1909. p. 43-4.) Production at Covent Garden, Lond. il. (in 111. Lond. N. v. 134. May 29, 1909. p. 778-9.) G., C. L. Critical notice, (in Spectator, v. 102. June 12, 1909. p. 936-7.) Pelleas and Melisande at Manhattan Opera House. (in Mus. Cour. v. 60, no. 14. Apr. 6, 1910. p. 32.) PUCCINI Puccini, Giacomo, 1858-. Apthorp. W: F. Puccini. (in his Opera past and present. 1901. p. 202-3.) Dry, Wakeling. Giacomo Puccini. 144 p. Lane, 1906. Rev. in Ath. 128: 840-1. Dec. 29. '06. Review of Dry, Wakeling. Giacomo Puccini, (in Mas. Amer. v. 5, no. 6. Dec. 22, 190G. p. 7.) il. Puccini in his study. — The musical message of Puccini; a review of Dry, Wakeling. Giacomo Puccini, (in Cur. Lit. v. 42. May. 1907. p. 549-51.) Elson, Arthur. Puccini, (in his History of opera. 1906. p. 302-14.) Elson, Arthur. Puccini. (in his Modern com- posers of Europe. 1905. p. 170-4.) Gilman, Lawrence. Life of Puccini. (in his Eminent foreign composers as guests of America. R. of R. V. 34. Dec. 1906. p. 698-702.) — Gilman, Lawrence. Puccini, (in his Aspects of modern opera. 1909. p. 33-63.) Streatfeild, R. A. Puccini, (in Grove's Dictionary of music and musicians. 1908. v. 3, p. 847-8.) — Streatfeild, R. A. Puccini, (in his Masters of Italian music. 1895. p. 189-213.) Streatfeild, R. A. Puccini, (in his The opera. 1897. p. 279-82.) — The Covent Garden season, (in Sat. Rev. v. 77. May 12, 1894. p. 494-5.) Veit, Alfred. Puccini; rival of Mascagni and Leon- cavallo, (in Music, v. 13. Jan. 1898. p. 296-300.) — The clever Puccini, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 2. Jan. 8. 1902. p. 22-3.) Letter from Puccini, (in Mus. Cour. v. 46, no. 13. Apr. 1, 1903. p. 24.) — Puccini scores modern music, (in Mus. Amer. V. 5. Dec. 1. 1906. p. 5.) Gorst, Harold E. Puccini's record, (in Sat. Rev. V. 103. Jan. 5. '07. p. 10-11.) Review of W. Dry's Giacomo Puccini. Puccini's operas, (in Nation, v. 84, Jan. 24, 1907. p. 89.) Puccini interviewed, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 11. Jan. 26, 1907. p. 3.) Puccini had to be tempted to study music, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 11. Jan. 26, 1907. p. 14.) — Puccini in America, (in Ind. v. 62. Jan. 31, 1907. p. 255 6.) Caruso entertains Puccini, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 16. Mar. 2, 1907. p. 17.) — His impressions of America. (in Mus. Amer. V. 5. no. 17. Mar. 9. 1907. p. 3.) Port, of Puccini. 75 76 PUCCINI Puccini, Giacomo, 1858-. Impressions of America, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 22. Apr. 13. 1907. p. 17.) Praises Americans as critics, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 25. May 4. 1907. p. 15. 111. Puccini's triumphal return to Italy. From Ars et Labor. Cartoon. Sketch, (in Theatre, v. 9. June, 1909. p. 198.) Portrait. (in Baker, Dictionary of musicians. 1900. p. 465; Cur. Lit. v. 39. Sept., 1905. p. 316; Elson, Modern composers of Europe, p. 170; Etude. V. 27. Oct., 1909. p. 663-4; Ind. v. 62. Jan. 31, 1907. p. 255; Munsey. v. 24. Mar., 1901. p. 881; Munsey. v. 28, pt. 2. Mar., 1903. p. 932; Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 6. Dec. 22, 1906. p. 7; Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 17. Mar. 9, 1907. p. 3; R. of R. V. 34. Dec. 1906. p. 699; Theatre, v. 9. June. 1909. p. 198.) La Boheme. La Boheme; libretto with Italian and English text; as sung by Ellis opera CO. 67 p. Boosey & CO., 1898. La Boheme. (in Famous composers and their works, ed. byL. C. Elson; new ser., v. 2. 1900. p. 160.) Elson. Arthur. La Boheme. (in his Critical history of opera. 1901. p. 307-9.) Hughes. Rupert. La Boheme. (in Hughes, Rupert. Musical guide. 1903. p. 345-6.) — Klein, Hermann. La Boheme. (in Klein, Her- mann, Thirty years of musical life in London. 1903. p. 436-7.) Krehbiel. H: E: La Boheme (in his Chapters on opera. 1909. p. 285-7.) — Law, F: S. The Bohemians, (in Law. F: S. Operatic tales. cl907. p. 324-38.) — Mehtz. Leo. La Boheme. (in his Opera-goers' complete guide. 1909. p. 173-5.) — Singleton. Esther. La Boheme. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 178-94.) Puccini's La Boheme. (in Music, v. 15. Dec, 1898. p. 215-17.) — La Boheme in New York, (in Mus. Cour. v. 42, no. 1. Jan. 2. 1901. p. 24.) La Boheme in Berlin, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 4. July 23. 1902. p. 5.) — Puccini's opera a bone of contention, (in Mus. Amer. v. 4. no. 22. Oct. 13, 1906. p. 7.) Hammerstein may give La Boheme. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 9. Jan. 12. 1907. p. 11) Settlement of litigation between Conried and Hammerstein. — La Boheme at the Manhattan Opera House, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 17. Mar. 9. 1907. p. 4.) La Boheme at Covent Garden, un Ath. v. 128. Oct. 13, '06. p. 451; v. 129. May 25. '07. p. 643.) May 25. '07; 128: 451. Oct. 13. '06) Edgar. Elson. Arthur. Edgar, (in his Critical history of opera. 1901. p. 304-5.) Girl of the golden west. Puccini, Giacomo. America as a centre of world opera. Cur. Lit. v. 50. Feb., '11. p. 196-200. Extended note on "Girl of the golden west" and Humper- dinck's Konigskinder. PUCCINI 77 Madam Butterfly, Puccini, Giacomo. Madam But- terfly. 3 V. Milano (etc.) Ricordi. cl907. Full score, to be found in the Library of Congress. Krehbiel, H: E: Madama Butterfly. (in his Chapters on opera. 1909. p. 340-2.) Law, F: S. Madam Butterfly, (in his Operatic tales. cl907. p. 360-70.) Melitz, Leo. Madam Butterfly, (in his Opera- goers' complete guide. 1909. p. 238-40.) Singleton. Esther. Madam Butterfly. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 274-92.) — Madam Butterfly, (in Mus. Cour. v. 41, no. 13. Sept. 26, 1900. p. 19.) An Italian opera with a Japanese American theme. (in Cur. Lit. v. 39. 1905. p. 316.) Port, of Puccini and ref. to Lend. Times, Ath. and III. Lond. News. Puccini's best work, (in Mus. Amer. v. 4, no. 8. July 7, 1906. p. 10.) Brilliant audience delighted by Madam Butterfly premiere, il. (in Mus. Amer. v. 4, no. 23. Oct. 20, 1906. p. 5.) Madame Butterfly at Covent Garden, (in Ath. V. 126. July 15. '06. p. 90-91; v. 29. May 25, '07. p. 642; V. 128. Oct. 13. '06. p. 451; v. 130. Aug. 24. '07. p. 129; v. 130. Oct. 12, '07. p. 453.) Madam Butterfly at Lyric Theatre, (in Ath. v. 130. Aug. 24. '07. p. 219.) Madam Butterfly in English. (in Mus. Amer. V. 4. no. 25. Nov. 3. 1906. p. 14.) K., P. M. Madam Butterfly captivates New York audiences, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 1. Nov. 17. 1906. p. 5.) Three ill. of scenes. Oilman, Lawrence. A new opera and a new con- ductor, (in Harp. W. v. 50. Nov. 24, 1906. p. 1686.) Madam Butterfly. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 3. Dec. 8, 1906. p. 4.) Paris likes "Butterfly." (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 8. Jan. 5, 1907. p. 7. one-fifth col.) Indianapolis hears Madam Butterfly, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 10. Jan. 19. 1907. p. 5.) — Chicago applauds Madam Butterfly. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 11. Jan. 26. 1907. p. 7.) Madama Butterfly in Italian at the Metropolitan Opera House, N. Y. city, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 14. Feb. 16. 1907. p. 4.) Milwaukee hears Madam Butterfly. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 14. Feb. 16, 1907. p. 7.) Minneapolis hears Madam Butterfly, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 15. Feb. 23, 1907. p. 16.) Madam Butterfly in Buffalo. (in Mus. Amer. V. 5. no. 23. Apr. 20, 1907. p. 8.) Madam Butterfly in Brooklyn. il. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 24. Apr. 27, 1907. p. 5.) Madame Butterfly again in English, il. (in Mus. Amer. v. 6. no. 23. Oct. 19, 1907. p. 21.) Oilman, Lawrence. Madam Butterfly again, il. (in Harp. W. v. 51. Oct. 26. 1907. p. 1572.) 78 PUCCINI Msnon Lescaut. Puccini, Giacomo. Manon Lescaut. 3 V. Milan, G. Ricordi. cl893. The full score: to be found in the Library of Congress. Elson, Arthur. Manon Lescaut. (in his Critical history of opera. 190L p. 305-7.) Krehbiel, H: E: Manon Lescaut. (in his Chapters on opera. 1909. p. 337-40.) Singleton, Esther. Manon Lescaut. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 148-61.) Manon Lescaut at Covent Garden, (in Ath. v. 103. May 19. '94. p. 654-5; Acad. v. 45. May 19, '94. p. 423.) The opera, (in Sat. Rev. v. 77. May 19, 1894. p. 525.) Puccini's La Boheme and Manon Lescaut. (in Music. V. 15. Dec, 1898. p. 215-17.) Conried produces Manon Lescaut. (in Mas. Cour. V. 5, no. 11. Jan. 26, '07. p. 13.) Melitz, Leo. Manon Lescaut. (in his Opera-goers' complete guide. 1909. p. 246-8.) La Tosca. Elson, Arthur. La Tosca. (in his Critical history of opera. 1901. p. 309-13.) Klein, Hermann. La Tosca. (in his Thirty years of musical life in London. 1903. p. 455-6.) Krehbiel, H: E: La Tosca. (in his Chapters of opera. 1909. p. 300-04.) Law. F : S. La Tosca. (in his Operatic tales. cl907. p. 348-59.) Melitz, Leo. La Tosca. (in his Opera-goers' com- plete guide. 1909. p. 193-5.) Singleton, Esther. La Tosca. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 215-32.) — Premiere, (in Mus. Cour. v. 40, no. 5. Jan. 31. 1900. p. 29.) La Tosca in Rome, (in Mus. Cour. v. 40, no. 7. Feb. 14, 1900. p. 35-6.) Puccini's La Tosca. (in Sat. Rev. v. 90. July 14, 1900. p. 46-7.) Runciman, J. F. Puccini and Kubelik. (in Sat. Rev. V. 90. July 14, 1900. p. 81-2.) Music in London, (in Mus. Cour. v. 41, no. 6. Aug. 8. 1900. p. 17.) La Tosca at Covent Garden, Lond. (in Ath. July 21, 1900, p. 96.) • La Tosca in Naples, (in Mus. Cour. v. 42, no. 4 Jan. 23, 1901. p. 21.) Tosca at Metropolitan Opera House, (in Mus. Cour. V. 42, no. 6. Feb. 6, 1901. p. 24-5.) Tosca in Boston, (in Mus. Cour. v. 42, no. 15. Apr. 10, 1901. p. 18.) La Tosca in Dresden, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 23. Dec. 3, 1902. p. 5.) — The Grau opera, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no 25. Dec. 17, 1902. p. 33.) Tosca in Brooklyn, (in Mus. Cour. v. 47, no. 15. Oct. 7. 1903. p. 8.) La Tosca in Paris, (in Mus. Cour. v. 47, no. 18. Oct. 28, 1903. p. 8. 9-10.) PUCCIXI 79 La Tosca. Immense audience greets Emma Eames. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 9. Jan. 12, 1907. p. 4.) Savage opera reaps success, (in Mus. Cour. v. 48, no. 2. Jan. 13. 1904. p. 17.) La Tosca in Paris, (in Mus. Cour. v. 48, no. 3. Jan. 20, 1904. p. 6.) La Tosca at Covent Garden. (in Ath. v. 128. Oct. 20. 1906. p. 487; v. 129. June 22, 1907. p. 770; V. 130. Oct. 26, 1907. p. 526.) Portrait of Emma Eames as Tosca. (in Harp. W. V. 51. Mar. 9, 1907. p. 352.) Oilman L. Production of La Tosca. (in Harp. W. V. 52. Nov. 21, 1908. p. 28.) Le villi. Elson, Arthur. Le villi, (in his Critical his- tory of opera. 1901. p. 304.) Melitz, Leo. Le villi, (in his Opera-goers' complete guide. 1909. p. 214-16.) Singleton, Esther. Le villi. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 93-7.) Production at Metropolitan Opera House. (in Theatre, v. 9. Feb., 1909. p. 42.) STRAUSS Strauss, Richard, 1864-. Bloomfield. Daniel. Bibliography of Straussiana. (in Musician, v. 15, Feb., 1910.) p. S7. De Koven, Reginald. The modern revolt in music. (in N. Am. Rev. v. 186. Nov., 1907. p. 360-9.) Sketch, (in Baker, Dictionary of musicians. 1900. p. 567.) Elson, Arthur. Richard Strauss, (in his Modern composers of Europe. 1905. p. 1-26.) Gilman, Lawrence. Richard Strauss. (in his Aspects of modern opera. 1909. p. 67-105.) Gilman, Lawrence. Achievement of Richard Strauss. (in his Phases of modern music. 1904. p. 3-25.) Henderson, W. J. Richard Strauss. (in his Modern musical drift. 1904. p. 98-168.) — Huneker, J. G. Richard Strauss, (in Hughes, Rupert, Musical guide. 1903. p. 753-4.) Huneker, J. G. Richard Strauss, (in his Overtones 1904. p. 1-63.) — Klein, Hermann. Richard Strauss, (in his Thirty years of musical life in London. 1903. p. 408.) Kobbe, Gustav. Richard Strauss and his music. (in his How to appreciate music. 1906. p. 207-23.) — Maitland, J. A. Fuller-. Strauss, (in Grove's Dictionary of music and musicians. 1908. v. 4, p. 717-20.) Maitland. J. A. Fuller-. Richard Strauss, (in his Masters of German music. 1894. p. 268-76.) Newman, Ernest. Richard Strauss. 144 p. Lane, 1908. Newman, Ernest. Richard Strauss and the music of the future, (in his Musical studies. 1905. p. 249- 304.) Paine, J. K. Richard Strauss, (in Famous com- posers and their works. 1891. v. 2, p. 601.) Streatfeild, R. A. Richard Strauss, (in his Modern music and musicians. 1906. p. 326—45.) Strauss, (in Sat. rev. v. 84, p. 661. 1898.) Symons Arthur. The music of Richard Strauss. (in Monthly Rev. v. 9 no. 3: p. 80. Rep. in Liv. Age. 236: p. 113.) Symons, Arthur. Strauss, (in his Studies in seven arts. 1906. p. 301-28.) — Thus spake Richard Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 40, no. 13. Mar. 28, 1900. p. 25-6.) — Richard Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 40, no. 17. Apr. 25. 1900. p. 19-20.) Bird. Arthur. Richard Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. V. 41, no. 25. Dec. 19, 1900. p. 32.) — Strauss, (in Mus. Stand. Dec. 29, 1900.) 80 STRAUSS 81 Strauss, Richard, 1864-. Richard Strauss, (in Mus- Cour. V. 42. no. 3. Jan. 16, 1901. p. 25.) Richard Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 42, no. 24. June 12. 1901. p. 19-20.) Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 8. Feb. 19, 1902. p. 20.) — Strauss in London. (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 9. Feb. 26, 1902 p. 33.) Strauss contra Wagner, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 11. Mar. 12. 1902. p. 22-4.) Brecher, Gustav. Richard Strauss. (in Mus. Cour. V. 44, no. 13. Mar. 26, 1902. p. 23-4.) Review of Brecher's book. Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 15. Apr. 9, 1902. p. 20.) Strauss, (in Mus. Rec. &Rev. Apr., 1902. p. 31- 34.) Marnold, M. Richard Strauss, (tr. in Music. Apr., 1902. V. 21, p. 371-82; Sept.. 1902, v. 22, p. 28-39; Oct., 1902, v. 22, p. 101-10.) Hanslick contra Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 20. May 14, 1902. p. 22-3.) Strauss in London, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 22. May 28, 1902. p. 25.) Kobbe, Gustav. Richard Strauss and his music. (in No. Amer. Rev. v. 174. June, 1902. p. 785-95.) Strauss, (in Mus. Stand. June 21, 1902. p. 390- 1, 393^.) Strauss in London, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44, no. 26. June 25. 1902. p. 14.) Runciman, J. F. Concerning Richard Strauss, (in Mus. cour. V. 44. no. 26. June 25, 1902. p. 17.) Critical sketches, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 1. July 2, 1902. p. 1, 5. 16, 17-19.) Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 2. July 9, 1902. p. 19-20.) Runciman, J. F. Strauss, Huneker and others. (in Sat. Rev. v. 94. July 19, 1902. p. 75-76.) Does not discuss the operas. Strauss is interviewed, (in Mus. cour. v. 45, no. 4. July 23, 1902. p. 17.) Richard Strauss' compositions. (in Mus. Cour. V. 45, no. 5. July 30. 1902. p. 5-6.) Modern song writer, (in Outlook, v. 71. Aug. 2, 1902. p. 876-7.) Strauss in London, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 6. Aug. 6. 1902. p. 5.) Henderson, VV. J. The future of orchestral music. Strauss, (in Atlan. Mo. v. 91. Jan., 1903. p. 70-7.) Newman, Ernest. Richard Strauss and the music of the future, (in Fortn. Rev. v. 79. Jan., 1903. p. 30-15.) Strauss, (in Mus. Times (Lond.). v. 44. Jan., 1903. p. 9-15.) — Strauss, (in New York Tribune. Jan. 4. 1903. p. 3.) Critical sketch, (in Mus. Cour. v. 46, no. 1. Jan. 7, 1903. p. 22, 29.) 82 STRAUSS Strauss, Richard, 1864-. Symons, Arthur. Music of Richard Strauss, (in Liv. Age. v. 236. Jan. 10, 1903. p. 113-19.) From the Monthly Rev. G., C. L. Richard Strauss, (in Spectator, v. 90. Jan. 24, 1903. p. 129-30.) Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 46. no. 4. Jan. 28. 1903. p. 5.) Review of Newman's article in Fortnightly Review. Newman, Ernest. Richard Strauss and the music of the future, (in Cur. Lit. v. 34. Feb.. 1903. p. Comment with quotations on Henderson's article in Atlan. mo., Jan.. 1903. Strauss the successor of Wagner, (in Mus. Cour. V. 46, no. 6. Feb. 11, 1903. p. 20.) Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 46, no. 16. Apr. 22, 1903. p. 8.) Modern music dilemma, (in Mus. Cour. v. 46, no. 17. Apr. 29, 1903. p. 20-1.) Keeton, A. E. Richard Strauss as man and mu sician. (in Contemp. Rev. v. 83. June, 1903. p. 845-54.) Strauss, (in New York Tribune. June 14. 1903. p. 8.) Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 47. no. 3. July 15, 1903. p. 18.) Strauss, (in Mus. Stand. Sept. 2. 1903.) Richard Strauss festival in N. Y. (in Mus. Cour. V. 47. no. 17. Oct. 21. 1903. p. 46.) Riciiard Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 47. no. 18. Oct. 28. 1903. p. 25.) Richard Strauss, (in Mus. Cour. v. 48. no. 6. Feb. 10. 1904. p. 23.) Strauss, (in New York Tribune. Feb. 28. 1904. p. 9.) Harris, G. W. Richard Strauss and his music. (in Ind. v. 56. Mar. 3, 1904. p. 490-94.) Strauss, (in New York Tribune. Mar. 4, 1904. p. 9.) Richard Strauss; an estimate (in Harp. W. v. 48. Mar. 5. 1904. p. 373.) Strauss, (in New York Tribune. Mar. 10. 1904. p. 9.) Richard Strauss, (in Bk. News. v. 22. Apr.. 1904. p. 863.) Oilman, Lawrence. Richard Strauss; an appre- ciation, (in Critic, v. 44. Apr., 1904. p. 352-4.) Sketch, (in Cur. Lit. v. 36. Apr., 1904. p. 402-4, 437-9.) Port, of Strauss, p. 403, from Town and Country, p. 437-9 summary and quotations from Keeton in Cont. Rev.. June, 1903 and Huneker in Scr. Mag., Mar., 1904 and Harris in Ind., Mar. 3, 1904. , ,^„^ Strauss, (in Etude, v. 22, no. 4. Apr., 1904. p. 147.) The man Richard Strauss, (in the Acad. v. 68. Feb. 11, 1905. p. 131.) Strauss, (in Musician, v. 10. no. 5. May, 1905. p. 190.) STRAUSS 83 Strauss, Richard, 1864-. Has Strauss been outdone. (in Mus. Amer. v. 3, no. 6. Dec. 23, 1905. p. 9.) Strauss excoriated by Hermann Klein, (in Mus. Amer. v. 3, no. 17. Mar. 10. 1906. p. 12.) Dr. Muck discusses Richard Strauss and Salome. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 13. Feb. 9, 1907. p. 16.) New love poem, (in Harp. VV. 48: p. Apr. 2, "04.) 529. Ziegler, E. Revolutionist, (in Bkman 23: Aug., ■06.) p. 634-7. Richard Strauss' extension of the boundaries of musical expression, (in Cur. Lit. v. 44. May, 1908. p. 542-3.) A summary with quotations from R. DeKoven's Modem revolt in music, N. Am. Rev. 186: 360-9. Strauss, (in Bost. Transcript. Oct. 5, 1908. p. 13.) Strauss, (in Bost. Transcript. Oct. 7, 1908. p. 23.) Richard Strauss, (in Nation, v. 87. Oct. 29, 1908. p. 420.) Review of Newman, E., Richard Strauss and the music of the future. Gilman, La\vrence. Study of Richard Strauss. (in No. Amer. Rev. v. 188. Dec. 1908. p. 934-7.) Mendelssohn and Strauss, (in Nation, v. 88. Feb. 4, 1909. p. 122-3.) Strauss, (in Athena?um. May 22, 1909. p. 020.) Gideon. H: L. Music dramas of Richard Strauss. (in Forum, v. 43. Apr.. 1910. p. 381-7.) The composer of Salome and Elektra. (in Lit. Digest. V. 40. Apr. 9. 1910. p. 731-2.) From London Daily Mail. — Portraits. Baker, Dictionary of musicians. 1900. p. 567; Bk. News. v. 22. Apr.. 1904. p. 863; Cent. V. 75. Feb.. 1908. p. 497; Critic, v. 44. Apr., 1904. p. 304; Cur. Lit. v. 36. 1904. p. 402; Elson, Arthur, Modern composers of Europe. 1905. p. 1-26; Famous composers and their works. 1891. V. 2. p. 604; Harp. W. v. 48. Mar. 5, 1904. p. 373; 111. Lond. N. v. 134. Jan. 23, 1909. p. 148; Mus. Cour. V. 45. no. 1. July 2. 1902. p. 1; Mus. Cour. V. 46, no. 1. Jan. 17, 1903. p. 1; Mus. Cour. V. 47, no. 17. Oct. 21, 1903. p. 1; Munsey. 1903. V. 30, p. 207; Theatre, v. 9. Apr., 1909. p. 12S; W. W. V. 13. Mar., 1907. p. 8591; Cur. Lit. 46: 432, Apr., '09; 111. Lond. N. 134: 148, Ja. 23, '09; 135: 262, Aug. 21, '09; Craftsman 17: 283, Dec, '09 (in group).) Portraits at various ages, (in 111. Lond. N. v. 134, Feb. 6, 1909. p. 190.) Electra. Hofmansthal, Hugo von. Electra, a tragedy in one act; tr. by Arthur Symons. Brentanos, cl908. The play from which the opera was taken. Hofmannsthal's sensational tragedy, il. (in Cur. Lit. Apr., 1908. v. 44, p. 429-32.) Hutcheson, Ernest. Elektra. Schirmer, 1910. Singleton, Esther. Electra. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 312-30.) Elektra, another sensational work, (in Mus. Amer. v. 6. no. 24. Oct. 26. '07. p. 2.) 84 STRAUSS Electra. Production at Garden Theatre, N. Y. city, (in Theatre, v. 8. Mar.. 1908. p. 60.) Portrait of Frau Krull as Elektra. (in 111. Lond. N. V. 134. Jan. 30. 1909. p. 150.) Premiere at Royal Opera House. Dresden, il. (in Mus. Cour. v. 58. Feb. 17. 1909. p. 5-6.) — Scenes from Electra. il. (in Harp. W. v. 53. Mar. 27. 1909. p. 32.) Musical value of Strauss' Elektra. il. (in Cur. Lit. V. 46, Apr.. 1909. p. 431-5.) Quotes from N. Y. Times; Bost. Transcript; Musical Leader and Concert Goer, article by C.V. Kerr; Lond. Daily Telegraph; Mus. Courier; Manchester Guardian by E. Newman. Portrait of Strauss. Cartoon in "Jugend" of Dresden Opera House after the storm. Schumann-Heink as Electra from N. Y. Times and one scene, also from N. Y. Times. Elektra. (in Lond. Times. Apr. 19. 1909. p. 8.) Elektra. (in Lond. Times. Apr. 21. 1909. p. 10.) Elektra. (in Lond Times. Apr. 24. 1909. p. 15.) Elektra. (in Monthly journal of International Musical Society. Apr., 1909.) Synopsis and criticism of Elektra. il. (in Theatre. V. 9. Apr.. 1909. p. 128-9.) Premiere at Royal Opera House, Dresden, il. (in Craftsman, v. 17, Dec, 1909. p. 281-95.) Strauss' Elektra. (in Bost. Transcript. Feb. 2, 1910.) Gilman, Lawrence. Strauss' Electra. (in Harp. W. V. 54. Feb. 12. 1910. p. 25.) American reception of Strauss' Elektra. il. (in Cur. Lit. V. 48. Mar., 1910. p. 322-5.) Quotes A. Farwell in Mus. Amer.; Mus. Courier; Henderson in N. Y. Sun; Finck in Ev. Post.; Krehbiel in N. Y. Tribune; Cartoon from Fliegende Blatter and three half tones of char- acters in opera. Baughan, E: A. Strauss' Elektra and the future of music drama, (in Liv. Age. v. 265. Apr. 30, 1910. p. 265-70.) From English Review. Elektra at the Manhattan Opera House, (in Mus. Cour. V. 60, no. 14. Apr. 6, 1910. p. 31.) Bernard Shaw's glorification of Elektra. (in Cur. Lit. V. 48. May, 1910. p. 536-7.) Feuersnot. Strauss. Richard. Feuersnot; ein sing- gedicht in einem akt von Ernst von Wolzogen. Opus 50, 331 p. Berlin. Adolph Furstner. cl901. The full score; to be found in the Library of Congress. Melitz. Leo. Feuersnot. (in his Opera-goers' com- plete guide. 1909. p. 118-19.) Feuersnot. (in Mus. Wld. Jan.. '02. p. 157-8.) Feuersnot in Vienna, (in Mus. Cour. v. 44. no. 10, Mar. 5, 1902. p. 12.) Feuersnot in Berlin, (in Mus. Cour. v. 45, no. 21, Nov. 19, 1902. p. 5.) STRAUSS 85 Guntram. Strauss, Richard. Guntram; in drei Auf- ziigen. Dichtung und Musik von R. Strauss. Opus 25, 525 p. Miinchen, Jos. Aible, cl895. Full score; to be found in the Library of Congress. Floersheim, Otto. First performance in Weimar. (in Mus. Cour. v. 28. no. 23. June 6. 1894. p. 11-12.) Melitz, Leo. Guntram. (in his Opera-goers' complete guide. 1909. p. 13&-8.) Guntram in Berlin, (in Mus. cour. June 20, 1901. V. 42, no. 26, p. 5-6.) Guntram. (in Boston Symphony Orchestra pro- gram. 1904-5. no. 4, p. 222-7.) Salome. Wilde, Oscar. Salome; a tragedy, with six- teen full page illustrations by Aubrey Beardsley. N. Y. Lane, 1906. S3.50. The play from which the opera was taken. Small ed. Lane. Strauss, Richard. Salome; dramma musicale in un atto di Oscar Wilde; tradotto da Alex. Lewington. Opus. 54. 352 p. Berlin, Adolph Furstner, cl906. Strauss, Richard. Salome; drame musicale en un acte, poeme de Oscar Wilde. 352 p. Opus. 54. Berlin, Adolph Furstner, cl906. Full score; to be found in the Library of Congress. Strauss, Richard. Salome; drama in einem Auf- zuge nach Oscar Wilde's gleichnamiger Dichtung in deutscher Ubersetzung von Hedwig Lachmann. Opus. 54. 352 p. Berlin, Adolph Furstner, cl905. Full score; to be found in the hbrary of Congress. Chop, Max. Strauss' Salome. Leipzic Reclam, 1907. (Universal Bibliothek 4955.) — Oilman, Lawrence. Strauss' Salome; a guide to the opera, with musical illustrations. Lane, 1906. Gilman, Lawrence. Strauss' Salome. (in his Musicof tomorrow and other studies. 1907. p. 81-98.) — Krehbiel, H: E. Salome, (in his Chapters of opera. 1909. p. 343-57.) Melitz, Leo. Salome, (in his Opera-goers' com- plete guide. 1909. p. 337-8.) Singleton, Esther. Salome. (in her Guide to modern opera. 1909. p. 293-311.) — Salome, (in Mus. Stand. Dec. 16, 1905. p. 385.) — Salome, (in Mus. Cour. Jan. 3. 1906. p. 5.) — Strauss' Salome scores an overwhelming success, (in Mus. Amer. v. 3. no. 8. Jan. 6. 1906. p. 9.) Richard Strauss' Salome; the musical sensation of the winter, (in Cur. Lit. v. 40. 1900. p. 307-10.) Quotes from German papers and London Truth. Portraits of Strauss and his wife. Cartoon from "Jugend." — Salome motifs dissected, (in Mus. Amer. v. 3, no. 19. Mar. 24, 1906. p. 13.) Salome in Leipzic. (in Mus. Amer. v. 4, no. 6. June 23. 1906, p. 7.) Thus spake Richard Strauss, (in Mus. Amer. V. 4, no. 10. July 21. 1906. p. 6.) Schneider, Louis. Salome's success. (in Mus. Amer. v. 4, no. 13. Aug. 11, 1906. p. 2.) 86 STRAUSS Salome. Reception of Salome in N. Y. (in Mus. Amer. v. 4, no. 20. Sept. 29. 1906. p. 5.) Gilman, Lawrence. Richard Strauss' Salome. (in No. Amer. Rev. v. 184. Jan., 1907. p. 180-5.) Paris sopranos at odds over "Salome." (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 8. Jan. 5. 1907. p. 6.) — Salome in Milan, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 9. Jan. 12, 1907. p. 11-12.) In Milan p. 11, one-sixth col. In Berlin p. 11, one-fourth col. VV. J. Henderson's lectures on Salome reviewed. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 10. Jan. 19, 1907. p. 5.) Richard Strauss' Salome. (in Nation, v. 84, Jan. 24, 1907. p. 89.) Chilton, C. B. Salome, a septic opera, (in Ind. V. 62. Jan. 24, 1907. p. 186-8.) Salome, (in Musician, v. 11, no. 5. p. 249-50.) Gilman, Lawrence. Strauss' Salome. il. (in Harp. W. V. 51. Jan. 26, 1907. p. 132; 53: Feb. 6. '09.) p. 27. Salome creates a sensation at the Conried benefit. il. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 11, Jan. 26. 1907. p. 1 cont. on p. 8.) Richard Strauss' Salome, il. (in Ind. v. 62. Jan. 31, 1907. p. 252-5.) Salome is barred from the Metropolitan Opera House, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 12. Feb. 2, 1907. p. 1 cont. on p. 8.) Gilman, Lawrence. A maleficent music drama, il. (in Harp. W. v. 51. Feb. 9, 1907. p. 206.) Salome, (in Outlook, v. 85. Feb. 9, 1907. p. 294-5.) Conried will give Salome on tour, (in Mus. Amer. V. 5. no. 15. Feb. 23, 1907. p. 1.) Emil Paur, conductor of the Pittsburg orchestra, gives opinion of Salome, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 15, Feb. 23, 1907. p. 7.) Seven veil music at the Metropolitan, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 16. Mar. 2, 1907. p. 2.) Strauss making a standard interpretation of the Salome music, il. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 17, Mar. 9. 1907, p. 18.) Salome dropped, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 17. Mar. 9, 1907. p. 1.) Salome; the storm centre of the musical world. (in Cur. Lit. v. 42. Mar., 1907. p. 294-8.) Richard Strauss and the music of the future, (in R. of R. v. 35. Mar., 1907. p. 354-5.) Cost of withdrawing Salome, (in Mus. Amer. V. 5. no. 17. Mar. 9, 1907. p. 17.) Burlesque on Strauss' music drama, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 18. Mar. 16, 1907. p. 14.) Madame Fremstadt tells why opera was dropped. (in Mus. Amer. v. 5, no. 22. Apr. 13, 1907. p. 21.) — Paris audience cheers Salome, (in Mus. Amer. v. 5. no. 26. May 11, 1907. p. 21.) Too many Salomes spoil the opera, (in Mus. Amer. V. 6. no. 2. May 25. 1907. p. 17.) STRAUSS 87 Salome. Salome in Paris, with portraits of Fremstadt, Kam, Destinn and Larsen as Salome, (in Mus. Amer. V. 6. no. 11. July 27. 1907. p. 7.) Portrait of Maud Allen as Salome, (in Theatre. V. 8. Sept.. 1908. p. 235.) The vulgarization of Salome, (in Cur. Lit. v. 45. Oct.. 1908. p. 437-40.) Quotes Henderson in N. Y. Sun; N. Y. World; Evening Mail; N. Y. Times. Portrait of Emmy Destinn as Salome, (in Theatre. V. 8. Dec. 1908. p. 335.) Production at Manhattan Opera House, (in Mus. Cour. V. 58. Feb. 3. 1909. p. 23-6.) Gilman, L. Strauss' Salome again, (in Harp. W. 53: Feb. 6. '09) p. 27. Production at Manhattan Opera House. (in N. Music R. V. 8. Mar.. 1909. p. 219-20.) Production at Manhattan Opera House, (in Crafts- man. V. 15. Mar.. 1909. p. 741-2.) — Production of Salome at Manhattan Opera House, il. (in Theatre, v. 9. Mar.. 1909. p. 76-8.) Portrait of Hedwig Reicher as Salome, (in Every- body's, v. 20. Apr., 1909. p. 564.) — Portrait of Bellincioni as Salome, (in Mus. Cour. V. 59, no. 5. Sept. 22. 1909. p. 5.) Maud Allen. Port, as Salome, (in Theatre 9: 130. Apr., 1909.) Portrait of Frau Krull as Salome, (in Craftsman. v. 17. Dec, 1909. p. 284.) ABBREVIATIONS FOR PERIODICALS REFERRED TO IN PART II Acad. Atlan. Mo. Bkman. Bk. News. Cent. Contemp. Craftsman. Critic. Cur. Lit. Dial. Etude. Everybody's. Fortn. Rev. Forum. Gaz. d. Beaux Arts. Harp. W. 111. Lond. N. Ind. Internat. Stud. Lit. Digest. Liv. Age. Munsey. Music. Mus. Amer. Mus. Cour. Mus. Rec. & Rev. Mus. Stand. Mus. Times. Mus. Wld. Musician. Nation. No. Amer. Rev. 19th Cent. Outlook. Put. Mo. R. of R. Sat. Rev. Spectator. Theatre. W. W. The Academy. Atlantic Monthly. Bookman. Book News. Century magazine. Contemporary Review. Craftsman. Critic. Current Literature. Dial. Etude. Everybody's Magazine. Fortnightly Review. Forum. Gazette des Beaux arts. Harper's Weekly. Illustrated London News. Independent. International Studio. Literary Digest. Living Age. Munsey's Magazine. Music. Musical America. Musical Courier. Musical Record and Review. Musical Standard. Musical Times. Musical World. Musician. Nation. No. American Review. Nineteenth Century. Outlook. Putnam's Monthly. Review of Reviews. Saturday Review. Spectator. Theatre. World's Work. TITLE -INDEX OF PLAYS AND OPERAS Page Admirable Bashville 64 Aglavaine and Selysette 41, 45 (L')Aiglon 55. 59 AUadine and Palomides 41 Amazons 50 And Pippa Dances 17, 21 Ariane and Barbe Bleu 44, 45 Arme Heinrich 23 Arms and the man 61, 62 Beauty stone 55 Bed of roses 34 Before dawn 21 Before sunrise, see Before dawn Benefit of the doubt 50 Blind (The) 41, 42, 43 Blue bird 42 (La) Boheme 76 Brand 25 Breaking a butterfly 34 Bygones 56 Cabinet minister 50 Caesar and Cleopatra 61, 62 Caesar's apostasy, see Emperor and Galilean Candida 61 . 62 Captain Brassbound's conversion 61, 62 Carnac Sahib 34 Case of rebellious Susan 34 Chance, the idol 39 Chantecler 58 Chatterton 39 Chevaleer 39 Clerical error 34 Coming of peace 21 Crusaders 34 Cyrano de Bergerac 58, 59 Daisy's escape 56 Dancing girl 34 Dandy Dick 50 Dark lady of the sonnets 66 Daughter of Jorio IS 89 90 TITLE-INDEX Page Deacon 35 Dead city 18 Death of Tintagiles 41, 42 Devil's disciple 61, 62 Doctor's dilemma 61, 62 Doll's house 25. 26. 34 Dolly reforming herself 35 Dream of an autumn sunset 18 Dream of a spring morning 18 Edgar 76 Einsame menschen see Lonely lives Electra 83. 84 Elektra see Electra Elga 21, 24 Elopement 35 Emperor and Galilean, 25, 26 Emperor Julian see Emperor and Galilean Enemy of the people 25, 26 Es lebe das leben see Joy of living Eternal masculine 68 Evangelist 39 Fantasticks (Rostand) 58 Fantastics see Princess and the butterfly Far away princess 68 Faust 48 Feast at Solhaug 25, 26 Feuersnot 84 Figlia di Jorio see Daughter of Jorio Fires of St. John 67 Florian Geyer 24 Francesca da Rimini 18, 20 ,49 Friedensfest see Coming of peace Fritzchen 68 Fuhrmann Henschel 21, 24 Gay Lord Quex 50 Getting married 61, 62 Ghosts 25, 26 Gioconda 19 Girl of the golden West 76 Girls and boys 56 Griselda 24 Guntram 85 Hannele 22. 23. 24 Harmony 35 Hearts of oak 35 Hedda Gabler 25. 27. 33 Herod 47 Hester's mystery 50 His house in order 51, 57 Hobby horse 51 Home 41, 42 Hoodman Blind 39 How he lied to her husband 61, 62 Hypocrites 35 TITLE-INDEX 91 Page Imprudence 56 In chancery 51 Interior see Home Intruder 41, 42 Iris 51 Iron master 56 Johannes 67, 69 John Bull's other Island 61, 62 John the Baptist see Johannes John Gabriel Borkman 25, 27 Joseph entangled 35 Joy of living 67 Joyzelle 43, 45 Judah 35 Kolster see Elga Knife 39 Lachey's carnival 36 Ladv Bountiful 51 Lady from the sea 25, 26. 27, 33 Lady Inger of Ostrat 25, 27 Last visit 68 League of youth 25, 27 Letty 51 , 57 Liars 36 Little Eyolf 25, 27 Lonely lives 22 Lord Harry 39 Lords and commons 56 Love's comedy 25, 28 Low water 56 Madam Butterfly 77 Magda 68, 69 Magistrate 52 Maison neuve see Mayfair Maitre des forges see Iron master Major Barbara 61, 63 Man and Superman 64 Man of destiny 61, 63 Manoeuvres of Jane 36 Manon Lascaut 78 Margot 68 Martyrdom of St. Sebastian 19 Mary Magdalene 42 Masqueraders 36 Master builder 25. 28, 33 Mayfair 57 Michael and his lost angel 36 Michael Kramer 23 Mid-channel 52 Middleman 36 Mrs. Dane's defense 36 Mrs. Warren's profession 61. 63 Monev-spinner 52 Monna Vanna 42, 45. 46 Morituri f>8 92 TITLE-INDEX Page Nero 47 Noble vagabond 39 Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith 52 Old master 37 Paolo and Francesca 47, 49 Peer Gynt 25. 28 Pelleas and Melisande (Debussy) 73, 74 Pelleas and Melisande (Maeterlinck) 41, 43, 45 Philanderer 61, 63 Physician 37 Pietro of Siena 47 Pillars of Society 25, 28 Preserving Mr. Panmure 52 Pretenders 25, 29 Princess and the butterfly 52 Princess F'ar-away, see Princesse Lointaine Princess Maleine 41, 44 Princess' nose 39 Princesse Lointaine 58 Profligate 53 Reconciliation 22 Rector 57 Red cock 23 Rocket 53 Rogue's comedy 37 Romancers 59 Rosa Bernd 23, 24 Roses 68 Rosmersholm 25, 29, 33 St. John's Fire, see Fires of St. John Saints and sinners 37 Salome (Strauss) 79-81 , 85-87 (La) Samaritaine 60 San Sebastiano, see Martyrdom of St. John Schluck und Jan 24 Schoolmistress 53 Second Mrs. Tanqueray 53 Seven princesses 41, 44 Shewing up of Blanco Posnet 61, 63 Sightless, see Blind Silver King 37 Sin of David 47 Sister Beatrice 44 Squire 53 Streaks of light 68 Sunken bell 22, 23 Sweet Lavender 54 Sweet Will 37 Teamster Henschel, see Fuhrmann Henschel Teja 68 Tempter 37 Three heron's feathers 68 TITLE-INDEX 93 Page Thunderbolt 54 Times 54 (La) Tosca 78 Trelawney of the "Wells" 54 Triumph of the Philistines 37 Ulysses 48 Und Pippa tanzt, see And Pippa passes Vikings at Helgeland 25, 29 (Le) villi 79 We can't be as bad as all that 39 Weaker sex 54 Wealth 39 Weavers 23 Weber, see Weavers White washing Julia 38 Widowers' houses 01, 63 Wife without a smile 54 Wild duck 25. 26, 29 You never can tell 61, 63 Young men's league, see League of youth ...THE... RIVERDALE PRESS BROOKLINE MASS. UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY nil |ll llll|||lll||i|i||i||ii|iii mill iiiiii||ii Nil AA 000 318 287 ^-