http://www.archive.org/details/faithofcatholicsOOberirich ff— /t * ' f l THE 5 —/ yi2 FAITH OF CATHOLICS, CONFIRMED 3V ^Crfptttte,/^E AbSeY ' AND ATTESTED BY THE FATHERS FIVE FIRST CENTURIES OF THE Clf\ QUOD UBIQUE, QUOD SEMPER, QUOD AB OMNIBUS, CjWSl "M fin. Lin, LONDON, PRINTED FOR JOS. BOOKER, 61, NEW BOND-STREET: SOLD BT KEATING, BROWN, & KEATING, DUKE-STREET, GROSVENOR SQUARE J BELCHER AND SON, AND WILKS, BIRMINGHAM; TODD, YORK; BELL, NEWCASTLE ; SH A RROCK, PRESTON; HAYDOCK, MANCHESTER; COYNE, DUBLIN; AND HALY, CORK. 1813. 35Wi73 LOAN STACK I by J. Ht'uker ft Son, Hi^h-itrttt, liivmin.£hanu TO THE CATHOLICS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, THIS COMPILATION, MONUMENTi THE ABBEY EgKA33fo THE ANTIQUITY AND PERPETUITY OF THEIR FAITH, IS INSCRIBED BY THEIR DEVOTED SERVANTS, Joseph Berington, John Kirk. November 23, 1812. 3i& INTRODUCTION. FOR my own use, and for the use of others, I have often wished for such a compilation as I now offer to my brethren of the Catholic communion. Our ministers, in their public instructions to the people, fail not to inculcate, that their church never framed, nor frames, any new article of belief; but simply stated, and states, the doctrine, which she received ; which doctrine, they add, comiug down to them, through an uninterrupted series of tradi- tion, is the same that Christ taught, and the apos- tles, instructed by him, delivered. The reflecting man, who hears this, says within himself: " I most readily subscribe to this position, because there can be no point, which I am bound to receive as a di- vine truth, that Jesus Christ, the founder of the Christian law, did not teach ; and I am sensible, that if there be not a speaking authority that can tell me, without danger of being itself deceived, what the truths are which Christ taught, my mind can rest only on its own unstable judgment, that is, it must be tossed to and fro y and carried about with every wind of doctrine. In the church, of which I am a member, I behold this speaking authority, established on the promises of Christ, and to It I submit; but it would be satisfactory to mc, to trace, by my own inspection, that body of divine h 11 INTRODUCTION. truths, in all their articles, which, from hand to hand, has heen brought down, and which, doubt- less, may be found in the volumes of those men, who, through the progress of ages, have illustrated the church by their virtues, and in their writings attested the doctrines which they had received." The minister of religion, if he heard this reason- ing, could not, for a moment, hesitate. He would assure him, that the question stood precisely as he viewed it; and, for the satisfaction which he wished, he would refer him to many books written on the subject, and particularly to the works of those venerable men, to whom he had alluded, the Fathers of the church; acknowledged to have been the faithful witnesses of the doctrines, which they had received, and themselves delivered. But the works of these Fathers were chiefly written in Greek or Latin, the languages of the countries in which they lived ; languages not accessible to all readers; and of those works few.Jiave been translated. Certainly, many excellent Tracts, in this country, and in others, have been compiled, replete with Extracts from the Scriptures and Fathers, to prove, that all the points of Catholic belief were, at all times, taught, as they now are: but few of these Tracts, with us, are, at this time, in circulation ; and those that are, come not up to the notion which 1 have formed, of the proper character of such writings* I would have them state — without any comment, and, as far as may he, without any diiect allusion to the opinions of others — the plain texts of Scripture, and the analogous or correspond- INTRODUCTION. Ill ing expressions of the Fathers, that the reader — free from prepossession and the bias of argument — may form his own judgment. It would be rash to say, that controversy has done no good; but the good which it could do, I believe, it has done ; and if so, methods of another order may become expedient. But, in truth, my motive is to be serviceable to the professors of my own religion. — I will now say, in what way I have proceeded. First. I state, in distinct Propositions^ the ar- ticles of belief, as briefly, but as comprehensively, as may be ; and these Propositions I generally take from a small Tract, entitled RomanCatholic Principles, ^wb- lished anonymously, towards the close of the reign of Charles II. This I did, because those Princi- ples, a few clauses excepted, are drawn up with great precision; and because in stating points of religious belief, I feel a predilection for whatever bears the stamp of age. Antiquity is the badge of our faith. In any other view, as the Catholic creed, in all its articles, is clearly defined, and is as unchangeable as it has been unchanged, it mattered not, whence the Propositions were taken. — Still I am aware— as all human language, not sanctioned by the highest authority, is open to misconception, and the expres- sion of the point of belief, must, from its character, be concise, and, in some measure, condensed — I am aware, the scholastic reader may sometimes pause, accustomed as he has been to scrupulous precision, and to weigh the utmost value of words. Should this happen, let me request him not to pro- nounce on single Propositions, but to cor\cct one b 2 IV INTRODUCTION. with another ; to explain what may seem dubious by what is more clear; and to permit the subse- quent words of Scripture, the quotations from the Fathers ; and — where they could be introduced — the decisions of the council of Trent, to develope and illustrate each Proposition. Secondly. The Proposition is followed by such passages from the Scriptures, as seem to support it with the clearest evidence. But 1 must observe, that I restrict myself, in a great measure, to the New Testament, not as doubting, that there were many passages in the Old, which might be brought to enforce the same doctrine — for we know, that the two covenants are united, as it is known, what use our Saviour and his apostles made of the pro* phetical and other writings — but I was unwilling, as such support was not wanted, to call in aid, the application of which might, possibly, be contro- verted. Thirdly. To the authorities from Scripttwe suc- ceed those from the Fathers of the five first centu- ries of the church. It was suggested to me, that it would be expe- dient to give, in an Appendix, the entire Latin and Greek originals of all the passages ; and I should readily have complied, had I not soon discovered, that the bulk of a work, which I wished to make as cheap, and as concise, as my plan would allow, must thereby be too much augmented* I have, however, taken care — while I attended to the accu- racy of each quotation — to mark the references so distinctly, that the originals might, with ease be INTRODUCTION. V consulted. Still, should the Latin and Greek be hereafter desired, they shall be given separately ; as it would cost me the trouble only of transcription*. It may be, that I have occasionally erred in the translation of some passages, not always very in- telligible; but should any such errors be discovered, I trust, it will not be in any point of moment. On some occasions, the original of certain clauses is given. It was my wish to be literal and plain. As order and precision are necessary for the attain- ment of accurate knowledge, I thought it necessary, in quoting the Fathers, to preserve the chrono- logical series of their lives; so that each authority should take its proper place. I, therefore, marked each century, and quoted the fathers, who belonged to it, in the order in which they lived. This is repeated under each Proposition. To each name are, likewise, added the letters L. C. or G. C. de- noting whether they belonged to the Latin or the Greek church ; and when any Father is, the first time, introduced, I state in a Note, who he was, and what were his principal works. It may be asked, why I have confined myself to the five first centuries of the church j why I have not brought down my proofs through the whole * I must acknowledge my great obligations to the Rev. John Kirk, of Lichfield, who, with patient labour, not revised only and •verified all the passages which I had collected, but likewise sup- plied many others, which were still wanting to complete the body of evidence, from the Greek and Latin fathers. I have therefore requested, that he will allow his name to appear with min« as being a joint labourer in the compilation. b3 VI INTRODUCTION. series of the succeeding ages? — The answer is obvious : why was I to do more than was neces- sary? If the doctrine, stated in each Proposition, that is, the doctrine now professed by Catholics, be that, which, in those five centuries, was taught and believed — not in one, but in all; not by one Father, but by a succession of them — as the faith of all the churches j your religion will be proved to be apos- tolical 5 and the deduction of the proof through a longer period of time would have added nothing to the evidence. Otherwise, the task would have required but one kind of labour; as the authorities, from the encreasing number of writers, would have encreased. They before encreased, the reader will observe, from a like cause. The authorities from the first centuries are scanty, compared with those of the fourth and fifth, from which, on account of their number, I was, sometimes, obliged to select the most prominent; while, in the preceding aera, when the writers, that remain to us, were few, and few the subjects on which they wrote, some scat- tered passages were all that could be collected*. * To the English reader, who may wish to pursue the subject through a longer period of time, from the introduction of Christi- anity among his ancestors in the seventh century, I recommend the Antiquities of tl\e Anglo-Saxon Church, by the Rev. John Lingard — a work, that, for deep research, luminous arrangement, acute observation, and classical elegance, has not been surpassed. Could my advice prevail, he will undertake a History of England t a task, for which he is eminently qualified, and which— if we may judge from the samples before us in Rapin, and Hume, and Henry— an enlightened Catholic alone can properly execute. The language of truth flows not from the pen which prejudice guides. INTRODUCTION. Vll Fourthly. Having completed, under each Pro- position, this portion of the work, I subjoin, on the same article, the decision of the council of Trent. This council or synod- the last, called General, that has been celebrated — was opened in the year 1545, and closed, after many interruptions, in 1563; the decrees of which on faith, but not on discipline, are universally admitted by the Catholic churches of the west. My motive for introducing the doc- trinal decrees of this council was, that the reader might have it in his power, to compare the words of each Proposition witli the words of the decree; and then, looking to the passages from the Scrip- ture, and to those from the Fathers, through the five centuries, on the same subject, judge im- partially, how far the doctrine is supported by either, or by both. Or he may, should it so please him, take any point, as he had learnt it from his catechism; compare it with the same, as stated in the Proposition and the decree of Trent; and then trace it, after considering the Scripture authorities, through those from the Fathers in regular suc- cession. Such is the outline of the form of this Com- pilation. — Some further observations, however seem necessary, to which I request the reader's serious attention. First. In reviewing the different articles of his belief, he will soon observe, how much more numerous are the proofs from scripture in support of some than of others; in favour of the authority of the church, let me say, than of purgatory, or the b 4 Vlll INTRODUCTION. invocation of Saints: and, if not well instructed in the principles of his faith, he might thence be induced to conclude, that the tetter articles rested not on an authority equally strong with the first. If he so concluded, he would palpably err as a Catholic. The creed or religious belief of Catholics is not confined to the Scriptures: but it is, that which our Saviour taught, and his apostles delivered, before the sacred books of the New Testament had any ex- istence. During the course of his mission, and after his resurrection, the apostles had been instructed by their divine master, fully and explicitly, we cannot doubt, in all things that it was necessary for them to know. To them he shewed himself alive after his passion, by many proof "s> for forty days appearing to them, and speaking of the kingdom of (2od : (Acts i. 3.) Then, giving to them his final commission, he distinctly said: Go ye therefore and Teach all nations, baptising, SCc. — Teaching them to observe all thi?igs whatsoever I have commanded you j and behold, I am with you all days, even to the con- summation of the world: (Mat. xxviii. 19, 20.) — The same commission is repeated: Go ye into the whole world, and Preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth, and is baptised, shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be condemned. (Mark xvi. 15, 16.) Commenting on this commission as stated by S. Matthew, the learned S. Jerom calls the form, in which it is delivered, the ordo prcecipuus, or the leading rule, and then adds : " Christ commanded INTRODUCTION. IX the apostles first to teach all nations; in the second place to baptise them in the sacrament of faith; and then, after faith and baptism, to teach them what things were to be observed. And, lest we should think that these things were of little moment, or few, he added: all things ivhatever I have commanded; that is, they who have believed, and have been baptised, shall observe all my pre- cepts; and behold! I am zvith you all days even to the end of the ivorld. This is his promise : he will be with his disciples to the end of the world ; thus shewing, that they shall never die, and that he will never desert them that shall believe in him."— Comment, in Mat. L. iv. in , fine. T, hi. p. 734. Had Christ said: " Go, and commit to writing the gospel, or those saving truths, which you have heard from my mouth ; and let that writing, or Written word, be the rule of belief to those whom you shall instruct, and to their successors, to the end of the world" — had he said this, the point had been clear. But he said it not: he commands them to go, and to teach, or preach. The commission is to teach; and obedience to that teaching is enjoined under the severest menace: He that believeth not shall be condemned ; or, as you may have seen it ren- dered, shall be damned*. Under what latitude of interpretation can it now be maintained, that this positive ordinance of Christ was merely temporary ; that it was to cease, * kaTfHflQYIOSTaii X INTRODUCTION. and be superseded by anotber rule, when the apos- tles should be dead, and the writings, which they might leave behind them, should have been de- clared authentic, and have obtained a very general circulation? — Were this to have been so; without any effort of the imagination, I might be allowed to represent to myself the apostle S. John, who survived his brethren, surrounded at Ephesus — as we are told, he often was — by his disciples, and thus addressing them: " My dear children; I have finished my gospel; written some epistles, as likewise the work, which, from the various scenes therein described, I have entitled Apocalypse or Revelations. Three other gospels have been com- piled ; a Narrative, called Acts, made public;' and my brothers Peter, Paul, James, and Jude, have addressed certain Letters to the churches. I can speak to their truth and their authenticity. Now then — as my time of abiding with you is short — it is essential, that you should know, that these writings are to be the future rule of belief to you and to all the faithful to the end of the world — not that ordinance of teachings which our master de- livered to us" Poly carp, the venerable bishop of Smyrna, who was acquainted with many of the disciples of Christ, and particularly with S. John, does not tell us, that he was ever addressed in that manner. But it is said of him, that •■ he always taught what he had learnt from the apostles/' And yet, surely, it was the duty of the evangelist so to have in- structed his pupils, had he been aware, that a new INTRODUCTION. XI order of teaching and believing was thenceforth to prevail. It is admitted, that the greatest part 1 of the books of the New Testament was, at this time, corning into the general use of the christian churches. The moment then was opportune and critical. We Catholics, therefore, believe, that our mas- ter Christ established a rule, which was to last as long as his religion should last; and that to give to that rule a security that should never fail, he pro- mised to be with the apostles and their successors, even to the consummation of the world. We likewise think, that the perpetuity of that faith, which Christ came down from heaven to establish, would have been ill-provided for — rather, would not have been provided for at all — if that ordinance of teaching, which, during his life time and that of the apostles, was judged necessary, had been then suspended, when it began to be most wanted. He would be with his apostles — who could enforce, even by miracles, the truths which they had re- ceived from his lips — but would leave their suc- cessors to the guidance of their own judgments; or, which is the same thing, to the guidance of a rule, which himself had not established, and that on points, avowedly not within the competence of human reason. The apostles taught the truths which thcv had learnt from Christ. / have received of the Lord, said S. Paul (1 Cor. xi. 23.) that which J also de- livered to yon: And again: For I delivered to you first of all, which I also received; how that Christ Xll INTRODUCTION. died for our sins according to the Scriptures : (Ibid. xv. ,3.) This is the ordo pnecipuus, the leading rule; first to receive^ and then deliver. He does not say, that he learnt it from the Scriptures ; but that he had received it. And the same truths, by the same mode of teaching, have continued to be delivered down to us, by the pastors of the church, the successors of those apostles*. The difference lies in this only 5 That the interval between us and Jesus Christ, the fountain of every christian truth, is measured by eighteen centuries; whereas the com- munication between that fountain and the apostles, and between these apostles and the next to them in succession, was immediate. But truth is not * The following passage was omitted under the name of S. Clement, p. 72. " We received the gospel from the apostles : they were sent by Jesus Christ ; Jesus Christ was sent by God ; and both happened agreeably to the will of God. Receiving command, and by the resurrection of our Lord fully secured, and strengthened by the Holy Spirit, the apostles went out, announcing the coming of the kingdom of God. They preached through the country and towns, and appointed bishops and deacons, their first fruits, and whom they had proved by the spirit. Nor was this any thing new: the prophet (Isaiah, c. lx. 17.) had foretold it.— These our apostles knew, through Jesus Christ, that disputes, concerning episcopacy, would arise; wherefore they appointed those, of whom I have spoken, and thus established the series of future succession, that, when they should die, other approved men might enter on their ministry. And of this ministry we cannot, without injustice, de- prive those, who were so appointed by the apostles, or by other eminent men, with the approbation of the whole church ; and who, in the practice of many virtues, and with the good testimony of all, have long, without blame watched over the fold of Christ." — £/>. 1. ad Cor. Inter PP. Jpost. T. 1. p. 171. 173. Amstehzdani, 1724. INTRODUCTION. Xm lost, nor, altered, nor weakened by descent, when an unbroken chain of living witnesses, provided with all necessary documents, proclaims its iden- tity, and the promised assistance of the Holy Spirit gives security to their words : / am zoith you all days, even to the end of the world. But how is Jesus Christ with the pastors of his church ? — How ! Does it become a thinking Chris- tian to ask this question }—How does the divine Providence govern the world ? — How, after he had left the earth, could Christ, as he promised, be with his apostles? — How were the writers of the scrip- tures inspired in the execution of their tasks ? But, if the subject be duly considered, it should appear, that no particular interference of the divine Spirit, in the government of the church, is, on ordinary occasions, necessary, to preserve its pastors from error. They deliver what they received. To this all are witnesses: the decisions of councils are witnesses; the faithful are witnesses; all liturgies and other forms of prayer are witnesses; the cate- chisms and books of public instruction are wit- nesses; 2nd the writings of all preceding teachers, joined to the admitted testimony of the Scriptures, are witnesses. A barrier, in defence of the truths once received, is thus formed, which no subtlety can undermine; no boldness surmount. Still we cannot doubt, that God, with paternal kindness, watches over the great work of his mercy, and interferes, as he judges it expedient; in the same manner, as it is believed, he guided the pens of the * evangelists, though all of them, by other means, XIV INTRODUCTION. were in possession of the facts which they relate. For as much as many, says S. Luke i. 1, 2, 3, have taken in hand to set forth in order a narration of those things that have been accomplished amongst us; according as they have delivered them unto us, who from the beginning were eye witnesses and ministers of the word: it seemed good to me also, having diligently attained to all things from the beginning, to write to Thee in order, most excellent Theophilus. But here, I admit, a question may be very fairly proposed. — If the ordinance of teaching, de- livered to the apostles, was designed to be per- petual, as has been said, of what use are the Scrip- tures of the New Testament? — We conceive them to be of no use, as an independent rule of faith, for this plain reason: That, as all the truths, which we believe to be divine, and which are the objects of our faith, came immediately from Christ, and were taught by the apostles, before those Scriptures were written — we are not at liberty to think, that those truths would not have remained, to the end of the world, pure and unaltered, had that primitive state of things continued; that is, had it never seemed good to any of those apostolic men, as it did to S. Luke, to commit to writing what they had learned. He did it, he says, that Theophilus, to whom he writes, might know the verity of those words in which he had been instructed, (v. 4.)* * 1 ho following just observations of an eminent Scholar, but whom the exercise of private judgment often led astray, I trai scribe with pleasure. " Our knovdtdj.c of the tacts related in th •an- e INTRODUCTION. XV But though these Scriptures are not to us a rule of faith, taken independently of the teaching au- thority of the pastors of the church, the successors of the apostles; yet we venerate them, as a sacred depositc, bequeathed to us by the kindest of parents, containing truths of high moment, prac- tical lessons of saving morality, and facts of his- tory, relating to the life of our Saviour and the conduct of his disciples, eminently interesting and instructive. For this we are deeply grateful. Nor have I mentioned all the advantages to be de- rived from the Scriptures. For, as the nature of the present work will evince, they come forward, with a powerful aid, to support, by the evidence of their contents, the divine truth of the faith which we have received ; applying that aid, in a just mea- sure, to each article, and giving a lustre to the whole. So Theophilus, when he should read that admirable narration, which S. Luke compiles for Gospels is derived from them ; but our faith or belief in them does not rest on the testimony of the writers of those books, but on that of those who first received these books, and who transmitted them to us as authentic, knowing them to be deserving of credit. The facts therefore of the New Testament we believe, not on the evi- dence of four persons, but on that of thousands, who were well acquainted with their truth, and by whom the contents of the gos- pels were credited. These books were not the cause of the belief of Christians in the first ages, but the effect of that belief; the books being received by them, because a priori they knew, that their con- tents were true- Consequently, if these books had not existed, the belief in the facts of Christianity would have been the same, and it would not be weakened, if they were not to exist." — Letters to a Young Man, Fart ji, by Dr. Priestley. XVI INTRODUCTION. him, would be more and more confirmed in the Verity of those words, in which he had been in- structed. Really, I cannot understand, under what se- curity of conscience, we could, unauthorised, chuse that for a rule of belief, which Christ did not ap- point — and which, if expounded by private inter- pretation, must often lead into error — and neglect that authority, which he so positively ordained to be our guide. Go ye, and teach all nations: teach- ing them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. And yet, I believe, it has been said — not by any member, indeed, of the Catholic church — that " the Scriptures are the sole rule of faith, and reason their sole interpreter", that is, that each one shall teach himself. * S. Paul allowed not this liberty to his Corin- thian converts. He speaks to them of the gospel, which he had preached; which they had received; and wherein they stand: and by this, he adds, you are saved, if you hold fast after what manner I preached to yon, unless you have believed in vain. (1 Cor. xv. 1, 2.) No choice is allowed: they must 'believe, as he had taught them. The Catholic reader will now be sensible, should any point of his belief seem to receive little sup- port, or even no support, from any text of Scrip- ture, that its truth is not thereby affected, as its divine origin from Christ, and its descent from the apostles, remain the same; and, therefore, that the doctrine of Purgatory and the Invocation of Saints stands on the same foundation as that of the Au- INTRODUCTION. XV11 thority of the church, though, in support of the former, the evidence of Scripture be comparatively weak. Why, or how, this has happened, let him say, who hath known the mind of the Lord, and hath been his counsellor. (Rom. xi. 34.) But even where the proofs from scripture are most plain, and most abundant,' the well-taught Catholic does not apply them definitively, as the light of his own understanding may direct him; but he turns to the guide that Christ appointed, that is, the teaching authority of the successors of the apostles^ which guide will lead him through the paths of truth, by explaining, in what sense, the passages of scripture, on doctrinal points, have, at all times, been understood, expounded, and applied. Such a guide is manifestly necessary, when, on those points — as it too often happens — the meaning of any passage has been made a subject of controversy. For, it need not be said, how prone to error is the undi- rected mind of man; and that whenhe thinks that he follows the evidence of the written word, which must be to him a silent letter, it is his own fancy that he follows, or the delusive light of a very fallible understanding.— -Such a guide, says the Catholic, can give me no security; while, if I wish for subjects, on which to exercise the powers of my mind— in which to err, indeed, may be easy, but where error would be innocent — they present themselves on every side. On points, avowedly, above my reach, I wish to risk no decision, uor on col- lateral subjects connected with them: for errors in religion, I am told, have all arisen from the 6 XV1U INTRODUCTION. scriptures misunderstood, or have been maintained by alledged proofs derived from them. The security, which a Catholic, well-instructed, experiences in the profession of his belief, resting on the teaching authority established by Christ, must be esteemed a signal blessing. And what adds to it, is, that the more he enquires, the more he finds that security confirmed, as he ascends, through the annals of time, towards Christ and his apostles; while the unlettered man, by a few plain documents, is taught, that the guides, whom his Saviour has commanded him to follow, can lead him securely into all truths -, and that, in trusting to them, he trusts in God. I would ask the soundest reasoner — when I had obtained from him the concession, that it was im- portant to believe the truths that Christ came from heaven to establish ; and that, on the admission of those truths, as the same divine teacher had so positively declared, depended future happiness. — I would ask him, I say, were I at a loss, by what means to come to the knowledge of those truths, what advice he would give me? Would he advise me to search the scriptures for them, and rely on my own sagacity for the discovery; when I added, that, on less important subjects, my own judgment often deceived me; and that, in regard to the mean- ing of some leading points in the scriptures, there were as many, (and as opposite) opinions as there were lines? — Or would he refer me to such a guide, as has been described, the speaking authority of the Catholic church, which could tell me, in what INTRODUCTION. XIX sense those Scriptures, on the points in question, had, at all times, been expounded; and, besides, could hold out to me a clue, that should safely lead me, through the series of ages, up to the time, when Christ himself taught, and the apostles, as he commanded, delivered the doctrines which they had received from him? What his advice would be, cannot be doubted. And I can as little doubt, that he would proceed to assure me, that to rely on any other guide, or to oppose to it the guidance of ff private judgment", must obviously arise from the most inveterate pre- judice, or from the wild conviction, that it mattered not what a man believed, when he chose a guide that could not direct him. I am then convinced, would the serious en- quirer — laying aside every other motive, but the evidence which common reason, would present to him — decide impartially, that he must embrace the Catholic principle of a teaching authority, resting on the commission given by our Saviour to his apostles, and the concomitant promise of perpetual assistance. But, is not this authority an overbearing con- troul? Does it not infringe that liberty of con- science which each one — it is often said — enjoys of chusing his own % faith, and of professing what he has chosen? That man enjoys this liberty in regard to his fellow-man, I am ready to allow. To one another we are not accountable. But is it so in regard to heaven? When Christ said to his apostles: Go ye c 2 XX INTRODUCTION. and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth, and is baptised, shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be condemned (Mark xvi.): when he pronounced this solemn threat, if Peter, with his usual promptness, had observed : " Master, shall this be? Shall that liberty be thus taken away, which every disciple should enjoy of chusing his own faith, and of professing what he shall have thus chosen ?" — I leave it to the person, who may be supposed to have made the objection, to say, what, probably, on the occasion, would have been the reply of Christ. I will suggest to him only, what, on another occasion, he did say to the same Peter: Get thee behind me, Satan, thou art a scan- dal to me: because thou savour est not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men: (Mat. xvi. 23) Notwithstanding what I have said of the au- thority of teaching pastors, succeeding to the apos- tles, and exercising their ministry in the propa- gation and maintenance of divine truth, I am aware, that we often speak of the written word, or the scriptures, as a rule of faith. — This has arisen from the great authority those scriptures bear, as the inspired word of God, and as containing the chief points of Christian belief. But that they are not to us, as I before expressed -it, an independent rule, is manifest, when it is moreover observed, that, not only do they owe their integrity, to the vigilant care of the church; but that no passage in them, on doctrinal points, is ever explained in any other sense, than as that church, in conformity INTRODUCTION. XXI with what she lias received, explains them. Hence we lay it clown as an introductory and certain principle; " That all that, and that only is of Catholic faith, which God has revealed, and the church proposes to our belief." — " The Catholic Christian" observes the learned bishop of Meaux, c< forms not his faith by reading the Scriptures: his faith, is already formed before he begins to read: reading serves only to confirm what he before be- lieved; that is, to confirm the doctrine which the church had delivered to him." — Conference avec M. Claude, p. 330. It is hardly necessary, I should say, why, in stating the distinct articles of Catholic belief, I have not included in them the high mysterious doctrines of original sin, the Trinity of persons, the Incarnation of the second person, and the atonement for sin, — I did not include them, because they are generally admitted by all societies of Christians — the followers of Socinus excepted — and my object was, to establish those parts alone which form the peculiar belief of Catholics. For which reason, as will be seen, I have lightly passed over the sacrament of baptism. To the high doctrines, just mentioued, we bow with submissive reverence; and from the rule, which, in their regard, guides the decision of our minds, we learn, how, on other points, derived from the same divine source, to proceed. Them we em- brace, because Christ and his apostles taught them: but Christ and his apostles taught these other points: to these, therefore, we submit. To act c 3 XX11 INTRODUCTION. otherwise would, surely, be absurd. They come down to us through the same series of receiving and delivering; the scriptures confirming their truth, and the Fathers, in their writings, witnessing the legitimacy of their descent. And shall human arrogance here interfere; and because it judges some points to accord better with its notions of truth than others, receive these, and reject the others ; receive the doctrines of original sin, of the Trinity, of the Incarnation, and of the atonements and reject that of the corporeal presence in the eucharist? Or the motive may be, that the scrip- tures, called in, without authority, to be the sole rule of belief, and arbitrarily expounded, shall seem to speak more distinctly, on some points than on others, It here seems expedient to notice a charge, often urged against Catholics, that the use of reason, in the concern of religion, is forbidden to them. — That this should have been said by Deists, who reject all revelation $ or by the followers of Socinus, to whose understandings no mysteries are accep- table j I can readily conceive. But I cannot con- ceive, that it should be heard from men, who them- selves believe, that the Divine Being has com- municated his will to man, and that, in the mani- festation of that will, may be, and are, not one, but various subjects, placed beyond the reach of human comprehension. For, by admitting but one single point— let us say that of the Incarnation of the second person — not, it is plain, from any evidence in the object, but on the single motive of its having INTRODUCTION. XX111 been so revealed, they by this admit a principle, on which the whole fabric of Catholic belief rests. To make this more plain, let me ask you, who are ready to submit your reasoning powers to this limited suspension — why you are a Christian? — I am a Christian, you will answer: Because, having maturely weighed the various arguments, which prove the authenticity of the Jewish scriptures; dwelt on the prophecies therein contained; and looked forward to their fulfilment, I seemed to dis- cover — in applying those prophecies to a personage, who appeared among the Jews, in the reign of Augustus Caesar — their probable completion. At the same time, a general expectation among nations, and particularly in Judea, selected that period as the season of some great event. Fondly then I contemplated the birth of" that personage, with its wonderful circumstances, his character, his conduct, his lessons of new morality, Ills miracles, his suf- ferings, his death, his resurrection from the dead, and his glorious ascension into heaven, all recorded, in the simple language of truth, by witnesses, who could have no motive to deceive me. And these witnesses, with their associates in the same cause, afterwards, I found, all died, attesting the truth of what they had heard and seen. The personage then, called Jesus Christ, who lived and died, as is related, was manifestly, I concluded, the expected Messiah, in whom the ancient prophecies were fulfilled, and who was sent by God to make known his further will to man. To his lessons I then sub- mit as to the voice from heaven : I embrace his law, c 4 XXIV INTRODUCTION. whether it contain moral precepts — the obvious ten- dency of which I plainly see — or it contain mys- terious doctrines, which I cannot comprehend. In these the authority of the teacher is the motive of my belief. Shall I, weak and limited as I am in all my powers, attempt to measure what may be in- finite; or vvithold my assent, because, having com- pared what is spiritual with what is earthly, I dis- cover not that analogy or those relations, on which my understanding can repose? The establishment of Christianity is then to me a Fact, to which, by no laborious process of reason- ing, I have been conducted; and, being thus far advanced, if I demur or hesitate to believe, from any such motives as have been mentioned, that Same reason, which hitherto has been my guide, will not fail to tell me, that, in so doing, I act not the part of a christian nor of a philosopher : — I have said; why I am a Christian. This reasoning, 1 admit, is, accurately just: but I must be allowed to add, that it is my own, and that of every Catholic, who, from considering the motives of credibility, as they are called, has been led to the belief of the fact of the Christian dis- pensation. But does the exercise of his reasoning faculties terminate here? It does not; because, from the unhappy divisions of the Christian world, he is compelled to go further. I will now say: why I am a Catholic. First, however, let me observe, that the distinction be- tween Catholic and Christian, in their proper accep- tation, is a distinction without a difference. It INTRODUCTION. XXV prevails, however, and has long prevailed to a cer- tain extent, since, as early as the fourth century, (though before well-known) a Spanish bishop, reasoning against the Novatians, who had separated themselves from the church, says: ic Christian is my name; Catholic is my surname." It served, there- fore, to denote those, who adhered to and were members of that great society, which in the creed is called The Catholic church. I am a Catholic then because I am a Christian; and I reason in the following manner: — 1. Hav- ing been conducted, as has been stated, to the threshold of divine Faith, am I not bound to receive, as undoubted truths, whatever God, in his goodness, has taught me by his son, without demur and without wavering ; not enquiring whether they accord with my preconceived notions, or with the relations and analogies of things conceived in my mind? 2. Would not such demur, and wavering, and such enquiry, argue pride, and a culpable want of confidence in that Being, whose wisdom, and power, and goodness, and love for his creatures, we know to be without bounds? 3. But how am I to learn,' what truths those are which God has revealed ? 4. Am I to learn them — for eighteen hun- dred years have now elapsed since first they were delivered — am I to learn them from those records, called the Books of the New Testament, wherein are deposited many words and actions of our Saviour's life and conversation, as likewise many XXVI INTRODUCTION. rules of belief and practice — or may those truths be collected from any other source? 5. To satisfy this difficulty, should I not en- quire, whether any Rule has been prescribed, which it is my duty to follow, and, by following which, I shall learn, in perfect security, the truths in question; conscious, that, without such rule to guide me, I must be liable, from the very character of mind, to fall into misconceptions and error? 6. I now turn to those scriptures, and pe- rusing them with respectful caution, I find, that, in giving his last instructions to his apostles, Christ bids them Go, and teach all nations, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever he had commanded; and he promises to he with them all days, even to the end of the world. (Mat. xxviii) In the gospel of S. Mark, c. xvi. I find the same injunction re- peated, with the threat, that he who believeth not the gospel, which shall be preached to every crea- ture, shall be condemned. 7. This is the ordinance or rule which I sought: and by it, 1 plainly see, two things are established : first, an authority which is to point out to me, by teaching, what I am to believe ; and secondly, a duty, if I will be saved, of listening to and obeying that authority. 8. But I cannot discover, that any command is given of committing to writing what our Saviour had taught, nor any reference made to books that might be written. Go and teach is the simple mandate: and as, during the lives of the apostles, there was no written word that could be a INTRODUCTION. XXVll rule, under what new injunction, is the rule of teaching set aside, and that of Scripture-interpreta- tion substituted? 9. The authority then, of which I speak, was first lodged with the apostles, to whom it was directly committed ; but as they, in a few years, would be called away from their labours, and Christ promised, that he would be with them to the end of the world, must not this promise include them and their successors in the ministry of the gos- pel ? 10. Should it be restricted to the few years of the lives of the apostles, would heaven, I humbly ask, have sufficiently provided for the perpetuity of that faith, the foundations of which had been laid at such a vast expence of supernatural means ? 11. In the successors, then, of the apos- tles, I conclude, was to be lodged, when they were gone, the same authority of teaching; and to the faithful was to descend, under the same menace of condemnation, the duty of receiving what they should be thus taught. 12. Still, this being allowed me, must it not be proved — in order to ascertain the genuine character of these teachers — that the line of their succession from the apostles, during eighteen hun- dred years, has not been broken; and, moreover, that nothing, at any time, has been added to, nor taken from, that deposite of sacred truths, which was originally committed to the apostles ? IS. Doubtless, this must be proved: — First, then, I look to the promise of Christ, that XXV111 INTRODUCTION. he would be with the pastors of his church to the end of the world. — Secondly I turn to the annals of history, in which is recorded the succession of those pastors — the object of my research — and I particularly select the succession of the bishops of Rome. — Thirdly I institute a similar enquiry, through a similar research, on the points of be- lief. 14. The result of this investigation is — That a line of succession, in that church, may be traced, distinctly and incontrovertibly ; and that, whether I take the whole code of belief, or, which is more easily accomplished, select any one article ; state it, as it is now publicly taught; and pursue it through the popular books of instruction, and the writings of those who, in every age, have re- corded its doctrine — I am, invariably, brought to one conclusion, that the Catholic belief of the nine- teenth century does, in no point, differ from the belief of the early ages, that is, from the belief of the apostles. 15. Here I rest in perfect security : my rea- son has led me to a guide, and to that guide I submit my judgment, on all those points, which it has pleased God to reveal, and his church proposes to my belief. — I have said, why I am a Catholic. But let it not be imagined, that, because the Catholic bows, in humble submission, to the voice of the teaching authority, on such points, and so far, as Christ has commanded, that his liberty, on other subjects, is abridged ; or that, on such sub- jects, he is not as free to reason, to discuss, to INTRODUCTION. XXlX receive, or to reject, as the freest man can wish. So it was of old : Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat, said the Lord to Adam: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it : for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. (Gen. ii.) Here was a re- striction; and shall the descendants of Adam think it much to be restrained, where the utmost licence of thought could lead them to no certain know- ledge? When our first parents did eat, we know, who told them, that their eyes should be opened, and that they should be as Gods, knowing good and evil. — I was not aware, that the exercise of private judg- ment had been so early recommended*. Under what misconception, now, has it been made a subject of reproach to Catholics, that the use of reason is forbidden to them ? I have led the reader through a series of investigation, com- posed of fifteen members; which investigation, it is plain, to be completed, must be carried on to a much greater length. And every Catholic, whose circumstances will allow it, and whose capacity will bear him through, is invited to pursue a similar enquiry, from which the avenues to his * This pretended right of private judgment is called by a modern writer " the pride and pleasure of the human mind." I recommend to the perusal of Catholics his work, entitled, A Sketch of the Denominations of the Christian World, by the Rev. John - Evans. In it they will behold a fine display of the effects of that prolific principle; while they learn to thank heaven for the better guide it has provided for them, XXX INTRODUCTION. faith will be best secured, and himself be always ready to satisfy every one that asketh a reason of that hope which is in him. To facilitate this enquiry, the following compilation has been under- taken — I will now proceed. Secondly. Much has been written on the use to be made of the Fathers, and on their authority in deciding controverted points of doctrine. — Their use — as far as the subject before us is concerned — regards their testimony; and may be considered as limited to their being zvitnesses to the doctrines which they had received. — What their characters may be as writers on general subjects, or what their style of composition, is foreign from my plan to consider. — I observe, when they speak on points of essential belief, that they uniformly hold the same language — the language of S. Paul — declaring that what they received, that they deliver. They give nothing new; speak of nothing new, but error: and to every attempt at innovation they as uni- formly profess themselves hostile. The testimony, then, of these men — not con- spiring to the maintenance of any preconcerted purpose; often separated by distance of space and time; not speaking the same language; some being Greeks and others Latins — is irresistible. It is not their reputation for piety, for candour, nor for orthodoxy, that carries conviction to the mind of the reader — for the testimony of Tertullian, when a Montanist heretic, to the fact of his having re* ceived such doctrines, is little less than before his INTRODUCTION. XXXI defection — but the simple circumstance of united testimony. In the second and third centuries, it will be noticed, the authorities are less numerous, from the obvious reason, that fewer works on religion were then written ; or that— which to us is the same — fewer have come down to us. But it has often excited my surprise, that all our doctrines can, even then, be so distinctly traced, when no opposition to their truth called for any direct testimony. On these occasions, however, that is, before the sub- tlety of error made it necessary to be more accurate, it was very natural, that teachers of the people and writers should be more loose and unguarded in their expressions. And so it was. S. Jerom, I re- collect, remarks, speaking of some fathers who wrote before the Arian controversy, that their words might not have been always accurate; and the same apology, on other subjects, has been made for Lactantius and other writers. They spoke without fear of being misunderstood; using such phrases as were in common use. But when that heresy, and those rising from it — the errors of Nes- torius and Eutyches — had made it necessary to adopt a language of more precision, writers of in- ferior talents and acquirements became more guarded and more correct. A man of common candour, being aware of this, will know how to judge, as he investigates the opinions of those early days. Before any con- troversy had arisen on a particular point of doc- trine, he will not look for the same precision, as XXX11 INTRODUCTION. after Arius and Nestorius had caused litigation; and he will be disposed to make allowances for the case. It may be expected, that I shall claim this allowance on the subject of Christ's presence in the Eucharist ; a point which, during the centuries, of which I am speaking, had experienced no contra- diction: but I shall not; with such fulness and decision is the doctrine every where announced. Still, I will not deny, that a captious controvertist may, on this and other points, extract some few passages, not always so full and explicit, which he may think himself at liberty to make use of, should the candour of his mind not incline him to compare passage with passage; to explain what may seem ambiguous or loosely- worded, by what is clear and precise; and to decide finally, not from detached clauses, but from the united evidence of those who, during the period of the century, wrote incidentally or purposely on the subject. Having mentioned the subject of the real pre- sence, and observed, how full and decisive on it are the sentiments of the early Fathers, I may be allowed, perhaps, to introduce the analogous de- claration of the great innovator, Luther. He is defending his own opinion against those, who — making use of the liberty, which he had promul- gated, of expounding the scriptures by their own judgment — denied the real or corporeal presence. " That no one among the fathers/' he sa)s, " nu- merous as they are, should have spoken of the eucharist, as these men do, is truly astonishing. INTRODUCTION. XXX111 Not one of them speaks thus: There is only bread and wine; or, the body and blood of Christ are not present. And when we reflect, how often the sub- ject is treated and repeated by them, it ceases to be credible — it is not even possible — that, not so much as once, such words as these should not have dropt from some of them. Surely, it was of moment, that men should not be drawn into error. Still, they all speak with such precision, evincing, that they entertained no doubt of the presence of the body and blood. Had not this been their con- viction, can it be imagined, that, among so many, the negative opinion should not have been uttered on a single occasion ? On other points this was not the case. But our Sacramentarians, on the other hand, can proclaim- only the negative or con- trary Opinion. These men then, to say all in one word, .have drawn their notions, neither from the Scriptures, nor the fathers.'* — Defensio verborum Ctfme.T. vii. p. 391. Edit. Witcbergce. 1557. These authorities so chained his mind, that no effort could release him. He blushes not to add : iC This I cannot, nor am I willing, to deny, that, had any one, five years ago, been able to persuade me, that, in the sacrament were only bread and wine, he would have laid me under great obligations to him. In the discussion of this point, studiously anxious, I laboured much. Every nerve was stretched to extricate myself, if possible -> for I was clearly sensible-, that nothing would have given so much pain to the Roman bishop." — Ibid. p. 502, d XXXIV INTRODUCTION. This extraordinary man could shew some re- spect for the Fathers, when their opinions served to strengthen his own; but when they differed, all respect ceased. Our Henry the VIII. had entered the lists with him, in defence of the sacrifice of the mass; the Friar replied: a thousand Cyprians, or a thousand other such were against me. God cannot err and deceive : Austin, and Cyprian, and all the vessels of election, might, and did err."— Contra Regent Angl. T. ii. p. 334. This may pass with Luther: but the more humble man will ask — If the testimony of the fathers may be disregarded, by what other means shall that chain of evidence be supported, which, through the lapse of ages, unites, and has united, the successive generations of believers, in one faith, with Christ and his apostles? I adduce therefore with pleasure the testimony of two divines of the established church, whose least praise it was, that they professed themselves the disciples of thi* inconsistent reformer. Dr. Cave thus speaks : " In this are all Protestant Divines, with few exceptions, agreed, that the Scrip- ture is the first and only infallible rule of faith and morals: and that the next place is due to the Fathers, as far as they accord with, and approve, and confirm, by their testimony, the truth con- tained in the scripture. We revere the Fathers: INTRODUCTION. XXXV not indeed as judges of the faith, but as witnesses, who deliver to us with fidelity what was, in every age, done and believed. They hand down to us the sacred deposite of faith ; and clearly point out what, and when heresies rose, and the article of faith which they opposed. The more ancient those witnesses, the stronger is their- testimony, and our reliance on them the more firm* Tims did those champions of old, Tertullian, Augustin, and others proceed in their defence of the Christian Religion — unceasingly appealing to their forefathers — and among them no one has treated this argument more successfullv than Vincent of Lerins, in his Com- monitorium against heretics." — Ep. Apolog. in ap- pend. T. ii. Hist. Lit. p. 68. Oxonii, 174'J. The same is the language of Dr. Mills, in his dedication of the works of S. Cyril of Jerusalem to the Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery : " Al- though you do not allow, that the authority of the Fathers is sufficiently strong to establish a new dogma of faith ; yet it is usual with you to adduce them as witnesses of the faith, once delivered to the saints, and as most faithful interpreters of the word of God. For since the many controversies, with which the church in our days isharrassed, have arisen from the contending parties not admitting any certain rule, whereby to interpret the Scripture — different authors drawing from the same words different, and absolutely contrary meanings— -these contentions would be happily terminated, if that, d 2 XXXVI INTRODUCTION. which was held by the church at all times, and in all, or most places, were, on both sides, ad- mitted as ■■■tnie, certain, and indisputable.- — And I mysdlf have heard you reject, not without in- dignation, idle scriptural interpretations adduced byfthe Anans and Socinians, for no other reason, •than! because they are most remote from the sense of the Fathers." * , It is proper to add, that many of these fathers, to whose testimony we have recourse, were them- selves bishops of the churches which the apostles had: founded; to which churches an appeal was always made against the heretics, in favour of the true doctrine. "-What the apostles taught," ob- serves Tertullian, , which influence precedes-, and accompanies, and iblloWi; all their, good works, and without which no works can be pleasing to God, we must believe that nothing is now wanti-ug to render them deserving of eternal life, in reward of their good deeds, provided they depart this life in the ^nace of God. Although in the holy scriptures good worlds are so much valued, that Jesus Christ himself promises, that a cup of cold water shall not lose' its reward; and that the apostle testifies,. that a momentary pain endured in this world shall produce an eternal weight of glory ; neverthe- less, God forbid, that a Christian should trust or glory in himself, and not in the Lord, whose bounty is so great to all and for the reform of abuses ; and as it is the last general one that has beep held, and its decisions, on doctr-inal points are universally admitted by the Latin church—these decisions may be' considetcd as forming a complete statement of the doctrines which tlie pre- lates^-assembled at 1 rent, had received from their predecessors. On the subject of Justification they say, " This holy Synod means to expound to the faithful that true and sound doctrine which Christ, the author of our faith, taught, which the apostles dclf- vered,and which the Catholic Church, glided by the Holy Spirit, has ever retained." Sess. vi. Proxin.p, 24. Edit, Anhwpia. 1640. a4 ( 8 ) meii, (hat he will have those gifts, which he bestows upon them, to be their merits." Ibid. c. 16. p. 39. Faith in Christ: its Object and Character. Proposition IV, The merits of Jesus Christy though infi* nite in themselves, are not applied to us, otherwise than by a right faith in him; which faith is one, entire, and conformable to its object, which object is Divine Revela- tion, that is, the truths taught by Christ, and to that revelation or to those truths Faith gives an \indoubting assent. SCRIPTURE. Mark* xvi. 15, 16. Go ye into the whole world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth t and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not, shall be condemned. * S. Mark was the disciple of S. Peter, and the founder of the church of Alexandria. It is generally believed that he wrote his gospel at Rome under the eye of S. Peter, and about the year 45 f if not later. ( 9 ) Acts* iv. 12. Neither is there salvation in any other. For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved* Rom. iii. 22. Even the justice of God by faith of Jesus Christ, unto all, and upon all them that believe in him, x. 8, 9. This is the word of faith which we preach : That if thou confess zoith thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and be- lieve in thy heart, that God hath raised him upfront the dead, thou shalt be saved. Heb. xi. 6. But without faith it is impossible to please God: for he that cometh to God, must believe that he is, and is a rewarder of them that seek him. COUNCIL OF TRENT. cc When the apostle says, that man is justified by faith, and gratuitously, his words are to be understood in that sense which the perpetual consent of the Catholic Church has held, and expressed, to wit, that therefore is man made just by faith, because faith is the beginning of man's salvation, the foundation and root of all justice, without which it is impossible to please God. Sess. vi. c. viii.p, 31. Divine Revelation. Proposition V. The Divine Revelation contains many mysterious doctrines, surpassing- the natural * The Acts of the Apostles, which contain the history of the church for about 30 years from the ascension of Christ, were written by S. Luke, the companion of S. Paul, about the year 6'3. His gospel was written a few years sooner. ( *o ) reach of the human understanding : for which reason, it became the wisdom and goodness of God to provide some way or means, whereby man might be enabled to learn what tlwse mysterious doctrines are- means apparent to all; proportioned to ilhe capacities of all ; and sure and certain to alL SCRIPTURE. Matt. xi. 25, 26. At that- time Jesus answered and said: I praise thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these tilings from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them to Utile ones. Even so, Father, for so hath it seemed good in thy sight. Ibid . xvi. 17. And Jesus answering, said unto aim: Wessed art thou, Simon' Bar-jona: because flesh and blood hath not r traded it to thee, but my F He that opposes and withstands the church, can he trust that he is in the church +?" De Unit. Eccl. p. 105, 106, 108. Cent. IV. jLactantiust, L. C. "The Catholic Church alone retains the true worship. This is the source of truth : this is the dwelling of faith § : this is the temple of God, into which he that enters not, and from which he that goes * Dum episcopus qui unus est,et ecclesia pretest — contemnitur. •f Qui ecclesia: renititur, et resistit, in ecclesia se esse conjidit t X He was converted in his youth to the Christian religion, and became the most accomplished and elegant scholar of the age. The emperor Constantine chose him to be tutor to his son, Crispus. In what year he died, is uncertain. Of his works, that remain, the principal are, Divine Institutions in seven books, and, The deaths of the Persecutors. From the classical purity of his language, he has acquired the name of the Christian Cicero. § Sola Catholica Ecclesia est, quae rerum cultwn retinet. Hie tstfons veritatis, hoc est domieilium Jidei. ( 18 ) out, forfeits the hope of life, and of eternal salvation*."—^ Inst. L. iv. c. 30. p. 232. Edit. Cantabrigiw, 1685. Eusebius f , G. C. " To what has been men- tioned I shall add my reasoning 1 on the divinity of our Saviour; but nothing newly invented from myself, no- thing from my own closet, nor resting on the opinion of my own sagacity. I shall deliver the uncorrupted doctrine of the Church of God, which, once received from ear and eye-witnesses, this church preserves inviolate J." In proem. de^EccL Theol.p. 60.— Edit. Colonics, 1687. S. Athanasius §, G. C. " If you wish to con- found the opinions of the gentiles, and of the heretics, and to show, that the knowledge of God is not to be found with them, but in the church alone [|, you may repeat the words of the seventy-fifth psalm." — Ep. ad Marcel. T.l.p. 996. —Edit* Bened. Parisiis, 1698. — " Let us again consider, * A spe vita, ac salutis aterna: alicnus est f Besides his Ecclesiastical History in ten books, he is the author of other valuable works, some of which are extant. He was bishop of Caesarea in Palestine, the confidential friend of the Great Constantine, and died in the year 338. ♦ Ttjv tr\; butMIK>wfoia<; . % ol rov xavova aafahn yivuaxovrtg. ( 23 ) tent discourses of lying sects." Ifcer. xlix* T. l.p. $04, Edit. Colonics, 1682. S. Jerom* L. C. " The Church, to which you should adhere, is that, which, having been founded by the apostles, continues to the present day t." Adv. Lacif. T. 1. p. 627. Edit. Paris. 1609. S. ChrySOStom } % G. C. He has left us a ho- mily, in which he expressly inculcates the respect and sub* mission due to the church, " whose greatness, he says, is such, that when combated, she comes off victorious ; wheu craftily assailed, she remains untouched ; when slandered, she shines with additional lustre§. — For what can be equal * He was the most eloquent, the most learned, and the most accomplished scholar of an age, which, in every branch of science, could boast of its great men. His life, which began in 329, was protracted to 420, a space filled by him in various offices, in tra- velling, in retirement, and in unceasing application. His works are numerous, and marked by a peculiar elegance of style. He never rose above the order of priesthood. f In ilia cccksia permancndum, que ab apostolus fundata, usque ad diem hanc durat. % He was bishop of Constantinople, and stiled Chrysostom from the golden stream of eloquence with which he spoke. . His works are numerous, as there is hardly any subject, connected with religion, that he has not illustrated. His Expositions of Scripture are peculiarly valuable. He died in the beginning of the fifth century, about the year 407. The edition of his works that is quoted, is always that of Paris l63b ; unless that of Mont* faucon be expressly mentioned. iff a K«0fOTaTai,— b4 ( 24 ) in power and strength to the Church of God I Talk not of walls, nor of arms; for walls decay wifh time; but the church never grows old with age. — The devils themselves cannot overcome the church. * M — Horn, de non contemnenda Ecclesia. T* xii. p. 491.— Edit. Montfaucon Paris 1735. Cent. V, S. Auglisiin^ L. C. "If you hear him con- tradicting not one particle, but the whole, and declaring that it is false : what will you do ? which way will you turn yourself? The rise of what book, what authority, what series of succession will you cite as a witness ? For if you shall attempt this, you will effect nothing ; and you here see, what the authority of the Catholic church can do J, which is confirmed by the series of bishops, succeeding to one another, from the sees founded by the apostles, down to the present day : to this add the agreement of nations," Contra Faustum L* xi. T. vi. p> 103. Edit* Paris, J614. " These, so many and so great, ties, bind the believing man to the Catholic Church But, unless the authority of this church induced me to it, I would not believe the gos» * hxMviao- zfe doupwos 7TE$iyiV0VTai. f S. Augustin was bishop of Hippo in Africa, and himself an African. His works are very numerous, and his name, on account of the erudition of those works, their vast researches, and their deep insight into all the ways of the divine economy, has ever borne the greatest weight in the Christian churches. He illus- trated the close of the fourth, and the beginning of the filth cen- tury, in the Latin Church, while S. John Chrysostom shone in the east. He died in the year 430. J Quid Eccksix Catholicas vakat auctoritas. ( 25 ) pel*. As then I obey those who say to me — Believe the gospel; so, why should I not obey them, when they say: Believe not the Manicbeans." Contra ep. Fundam* T. vi. p. 46. " This Church, moreover, the divine authority com- mends, and as it cannot deceive us, fee, who fears to be im- posed on, under the obscurity of the present question, (concerning baptism), will consult the church +, which, without any ambiguity, the scriptures establish." Contra Crescon. L. 1. T. vii. p. 168. "'Do thou run to the ta- bernacle of God ; hold fast to the Catholic Church; do not depart from the rule of truth +, and thou shalt be protected in the tabernacle from the contradiction of tongues." Enar. in. in Psal. SO. T. viii. p. 74. 8. Isidore of Pelusium,§ G. C. "Those holy volumes of Scriptures are certain steps, by which to ascend to God. Receive therefore, as pure gold, and purged, as it were, by the Holy Spirit, whatever is pro- posed to you in the church ||. But as to such writings, as are not contained in that holy volume, though they may hold out some good advice, leave them to be dis- cussed and preserved by others." Ep. 369. p. 96. Edit. Paris. 1638. * Nisi me Catholiece Ecclesia: commoveret authoritas. f Eandem ecclesiam de ilia consulat. I Ecclesiam Catholicam tene ; a regula •ccritatis noli disccdere. § A priest of Damiata, anciently called Pelusium, in Egypt. He flourished from the beginning of the fifth century, till towards the year 435, or 440, and has left us 2012 letters, written in Greek. ( 26 ) S. Cyril of Alexandria* G. C. "Though the mind of man, sometimes, from self-love, depart from the right road, and from true belief, yet almost always does it feel oppression, fearing to charge its thoughts with absurdity. But to reform itself is easy, if it will but carefully examine what the fathers have written, whom all esteem for the truth and rectitude of their opinions : and thus will be discovered what true faith is. For men, whose hearts are upright, wish to follow them. They, having stored their minds with the doctrines delivered by the apos- tles, and treated the points of belief in a manner void of all blame, became the lights of the world." — ApoL ad Oriental, analhem. viii. T. vi. p. 178. Edit. Paris. 1638, Capreolus of Carthage^ L. C. "Though the authority of the universal church be amply suffi- cient yet, that I may not seem to refuse an answer to your request, I will say : We profess that to be the one and true doctrine, which evangelical antiquity holds and delivers." — Ep. ad Vitalem $? Constant. Labbe Cone* Gen. T. ii. p. 1691. Ed. Paris. 1671, Vincent of Lerins,% L. C. But, in this, * He succeeded Theophilus, in the patriarchal see of Alexan- dria, in 412, and was the active and successful opponent of Nes- torius; against whom was called in 431, the council of Ephesus, in which S. Cyril presided. He died in 444. The best edition of his works, in Greek and Latin, is that of Paris in l6'38, in six Tomes, by John Aubert. t He succeeded Aurelius in the see of Carthage, and in 431 sent his deputies to the council of Ephesus, with a letter, which is «xtant in the acts of that council. % He acquired the name of Lerinensis from the isle of Lerins in the south of France, where was a celebrated monastery, in ( 27 ) Catholic Church, we must be particularly careful to hold fast that doctrine, which has been believed in all places, at all times, and by all*. For as the word itself plainly denotes, there is nothing truly and properly Catholic^ but that which comprehends all in general. Now it will be so, if we follow universality, antiquity, and unani- mous consent. We shall follow universality ', if we be- lieve that doctrine alone to be true, which the church every where admits. We shall follow antiquity, if we depart not from the opinions which our ancestors and fathers openly maintained. We shall follow unanimous consent^ if we adhere to the sentiments of all, or of almost all, our pastors and teachers." Commonit, 1. n, ii. p. 317. Edit. Paris. 1684, " But," he proceeds, "what shall the Catholic Christian do, if any portion of the church fall from the universal faith ? — Prefer the sanity of the whole body to the distempered member. Should some novel contagion strive to infect a whole church ? — Then also will he be careful to hold fast to antiquity, which no fraud of novelty can seduce. But if in that antiquity itself should be detected the error of two or three men, or of a city, or a province ? In that case, the rashness or ignorance of a few must be met by the de- crees of some ancient universal council. Should no such decrees be found, then will he consult and weigh together which he was a monk. The only work, which he has left, is a small unfinished Treatise, entitled Commonitorium ; but though small, it is replete with excellent matter, not inelegantly expressed. The principles which he establishes, and the rules which he lays down, whereby christian truth may be securely ascertained, and the plausible artifices of heretics may be detected, are admirable. The reader shall himself judge. Vincent died about the year 445. The best edition of his treatise is that of.Baluze in l6'84. t Quod ubiqtie, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est ( 28 ) the opinions of his elders, of those, who, though living at different times and in different places,yet abiding in the com- munion and faith of the one Catholic Church, were deemed worthy teachers ; and what, not one or two only, but all of them shall be found, with unanimity, publicly, frequently, and pcrseverantly to have held and taught and written, that, without hesitation, he must embrace*." Ibid. n. iii. p. 318. — 'These rules, he adds/were practically exemplified in Africa, when the errors of the Donat ists t had seduced many ; and, on a larger scale, through the Christian world, during the great Arian controversy +. — ri. v. vi. — " Thus," he observes, ffl was antiquity preserved, and novelty ex- ploded^." n. ix. p. 323. 4i Never was it allowed, never is it allowed, never will it be allowed, to deliver any doctrine to the Catholic Christian, that has not been received : and it ever has been, is, and ever will be a duty to anathematize those, who in- troduce any novelty [|. Who, therefore, shall dare to preach what he has not received ? Who shall shew him- self so easy of belief, as to admit what the church has not delivered ? So taught the great Apostle. But I hear some * Quicquid* * • »o?nnes pariter uno eodemque consensu apeite, fre- quenter, per sever 'anter tenuisse, scripsisse, docuisse cognovcrit, id sibi quoque inteltigat absque ulla dubitatione credendum. t The Donatists were schismatics in Africa, in the fourth cen- tury, and maintained that the true church was only to be found among themselves, and that baptism, and the other saciaments were null, when conferred by any others. Their excesses are described by S. Optatus of Milevis, and their errors refuted by S. Augustin. I The Arians denied that the Sen of God was of the same substance with the Father. § Retenta est scilicet antiquitas, explosa novitas. |j AdnwUiarc aliquid christianis catholkis, prater id quod acct* ( 29 ) vain men cry, and cry to Catholics : under our authority, our rule, our exposition, condemn what you held, take up that which you condemned, reject your ancient belief, the doctrines of your fathers, the institutes of your elders, and embrace — what?— I shudder to utter it." Ibid. n. ix. p. 328. "Reflecting often on tltese things, I am astonished at the madness, (he impiety, the lust of error in some men, who, not content with the rule of faith -once delivered and received, are ever seeking for something new, and are ever anxious to add to religion, to change, or to take away, as if, what was once revealed, was not a celestial dogma, but a human institution, which, to be brought to perfec- tion, required constant emendation, or rather correction. If novelty must be shunned, antiquity must be held fast: if novelty be profane, antiquity is sacred*, ' Ibid. n. xxi. p. 348. "What mean those words to Timothy (I. Tim. vi. £0.) — Keep that which is committed to thy trust f — They mean— That which was entrusted to thee, not what was invented by thee : what thou didst receive, not what thou didst devise: a thing, not of ingenuity, but of doctrine: not of private science, but of public delivery : brought to thee, not arising from thee : a thing, of which thou must be the guardian, not the author: the disciple, not the master : the follower, not the leader. — What was entrusted to thee, that retain, that deliver. Thou hast received gold ; thou must return gold, no base metal, no counterfeit. O perunt, nunquam licuit, nusqitam licet, nunquam licebit ; et anathem- atizare eos qui annuntiant aliquid p) alerquam quod semel acceptum est, nunquam non oportuit, nusquam non oporiet, nunquam nan opor- tebit. * Si vitanda est novitas, tencnda est antiquitas ; et si prophano, est novitas. mcrata est vetuitas. ( 30 ) Timothy, if the divine bounty hath given thee the capa- city, use it to polish the precious gems of the divine word, to arrange them with fidelity, with skill to embellish them : give them splendour, grace, and beauty, what before, though involved in some obscurity, was believed, whilst thou expouudest, be it more clearly understood. Posterity, to thee indebted, may behold in a brighter day, what their fathers venerated in obscurity : but teach what alone thou didst learn; that, while the expression may be new, the thing said be ancient*." — Ibid.' n. xxii. p. 350. " Why, then, it may be said : — Is the church of Christ to make no advance, no proficiency, in religious know- ledge ? — God forbid ! But let it be a real proficiency not a change +. By the first is understood, that the thing be im- proved within itself: by the second, that something be introduced from without. Let intellect, science, wisdom, in all orders of men, and in all ages, receive every possible increase ; but, without any change in the dogma, in its sense, in its acceptation J." This he illustrates from the growth of the human body, which, through all its changes from childhood to manhood, retains its identity, and then adds: " So may the dogma of Christian belief follow the same laws of increase : be expanded by age, be consolidated by years; itself ever remaining unchanged and untouched ; full and perfect in all its parts and members, without any admixture, any loss of substance, any variation of mean- ing." Ibid. n. xxiii. p. 350, 351, 352. 41 Should the license of change be ever allowed, I shudder to think, to what danger of utter ruin religion * Eadem tamen quae didicisti docc, ut cum dicas nove, non d.'cas nova, f Vere profectus sit ille fdei non permutation I In codem scilicet dogmate, eodem sensu, cademquc sentcntia. ( 31 ) must be exposed. For, one point of belief being surren- dered, another, and a third, will follow, and then more, as by an acquired privilege *. Thus the whole must fall into ruins." Ibid. p. 353. Under the following heads, and particularly under Prop. viii. and ix. will be found many other extracts from the fathers, attesting the truth of the proposition ; that is, attesting that the Catholic Church is the guide td truth, the expounder of the scriptures, and the judge of contro- versy. Marks of tlte Church. Its Unity. SCRIPTURE. John x. 16. And other sheep I have, that are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be onefold, and one shepherd. Ibid, xvii. 20,21. And not for them only do I pray, but for them also, who through their word shall believe in me: that they all may be one, as thou, Father, in me, and 1 in thee: that they also may be one in us. Rom. xv- 5, 6. The God of patience and of comfort grant you to be of one mind, one towards another, according * Abdicata qualibet parte catholici dogmatis, alia quoque atauc item alia, ac deinceps alia et alia, jam quasi ex more et lictio, abdi* cabuntur. ( 32 ) to Jesus Christ : that with one mind, and with one mouth, you may glorify God, and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ* Ibid. xvi. 17, Now, I beseech you, brethren, to mark them, who cause dissentions, and offences contrary to the doctrine, which you hate learned, and to avoid them* 1 Cor. i. 10. Now, I beseech you, brethren — that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no schisms among you / but that you be perfect in the same mind) and in the same judgment* Ephes. iv. 3, 4, 5, 6. Careful to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace, one body, and one sjirit; as you are called in one hope of your calling. One Lord 9 one faith, one baptism. One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in us all. Phil. iii. 15. 16. Let us, therefore, as many as are perfect, be thus minded. — Nevertheless, whereunto we are already arrived, that we be of the same mind', let us also continue in the same rule. Titus iii. 10. A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid: knowing, that he that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment. FATHERS. Cent. I. &. Ignatius,* O. C. Having recommended, a* * He was bishop of Antioch, the second from S. Peter; and having governed that church about 40 yeais, suffered martyrdom ( 33 ) he does in all his epistles, concord among themselves, and submission to superiors, he says to the people of Magnesia: "Avoiding heterodox opinions*, and useless fables — labour to be strengthened in the doctrines of the Lord and of the apostles, in order that you prosper in all things, in body and spirit, in faith and charily—, together with your respectable bishop, the united col- lege of priests, and the holy deacons. Be submissive to the bishop and to one another, as Jesus Christ, according to the flesh, was to his father, and the apostles to Christ, and to the father and the holy Spirit — that your union be in body and spirit." — Ep. adMagncsios: Inter PP. Apost, T.2.p.2l. Ed. Amsterdam?, 1724. 16 I conjure you to use only Christian food, and to re- frain from foreign weed, which is heresy t. — Guard your- selves from such, which you will do, if you be not puffed up, but remain inseparably united to Jesus Christ, and your bishop + and the ordinances of the apostles. He who is within the altar is clean ; but he who is without, that is, without the bishop, and the priests, and the deacons, is not clean." Ep. ad Trallianos: p. 23. — The same love of unity, and the greatest horror of schism he often repeats : " He who corrupts the faith of God, for which Christ suf- fered, the same, being defiled, shall go into unquenchable at Rome, by the command of the emperor Trajan, in the begin- ning of the second century, leaving behind him seven epistles, ad- dressed to different churches, and acknowledged to be genuine. He had been the disciple of S. John ; and his letters breathe the whole spirit of that apostle. * (xn irhxiacfe reus ET£go$o£icu;. + ring Ictiv uteris. J axupne seul, and one heart: the same faith she delivers and teaches, with one accord, and as it' gifted with one tongue +: for though in the world there be various modes or speech, the tradition of doctrine is one and the same. In the churches of Germany, in those of Spain and Gaul, in those of the East, of Egypt, and of Africa, and in the middle regions, is the same belief, the same teaching. For as the world is enlightened by one sun, so does the preaching of of Jerusalem ; though he resided near twenty years at Rome. S. Jerom says, that he lived near to the apostolic times, and com- piled a history, in five books, of all that had passed from the death of our Saviour to his own days. A few fragments are preserved by Eusebius. He died about the year ISO. * Tt\v aurrw %a^a hqlytuv TrapsiKnQe $i$x<7KCihixv-— t £{XEfi A)$ iv CTQpa HtHTYlfXeVYI. C 2 ( 36 ) one faith enlighten all men, that are willing to come to the knowledge of truth. Nor, among the pastors of the church, does he that is eloquent, deliver other doctrine — for no one is above his master — nor he that is weak in speech, diminish the truth of tradition. Faith being one, cannot be affected by the powers or the want of utterance*." Ad' versus Hcereses: L. I.e. ii. iii. p* 45, 46. Ed, Oxon. 1702. iC God placed in his church Apostles, prophets, doc- tors; and the whole operation of the spirit, of which they do not partake, who are not united to the church ; but, by their own bad designs and actions, they deprive them- selves of life. For where the church is, there is the spirit of God; and where this spirit is, there is the church, and all grace : the spirit is truth.' ' Ibid. L. iii. c. xl. p. 266. Vide L* iv. c. 62. About the time of S. Ircnaeus began the Quartodeci- man dispute. — This question — which regarded the time of celebrating the festival of Easter, and which was finally decided, against the churches of Asia Minor, by the coun- cil of Nice — proved the anxious solicitude of the church to maintain unity in discipline as well as unity in faith. To depart from the Jewish practice, and to avoid some incon- veniences that this practice caused, was an additional mo- tive ; but, uniformity was the leading object, and it was obtained by the decision of the synod* Tertullian, L. C- " The Apostles, having re- ceived the promised assistance of the Holy Spirit, first preached the faith in Judca, and planted churches, whence, going into the whole world, they proclaimed the same doc- * This passage is preserved in Greek, and, when compared with the Latin, it causes regret, that the whole is not extant in that language. ( 37 ) trine to the nations, and founded churches.— Therefore, the so many and so great churches are one, from that one of the apostles, from which are all. And thus all are aposto- lic, while all maintain the same unity.**' De Prcescrip. c« xx. p* 33i. — " There is one faith to the Apostles and to us t, one God, one Christ, one hope, the same sacraments. Let me say it in one word, we are one church. Whatever belongs to any among us, is also our ownj." De virg. velanJ* p. 309. S. Clement of Alexandria. G. C- "From what has been said, I think it manifest, that there is only one true churchy, which is alone ancient, to which all the just properly belong. — This church, which is one||, is formed into one nature, which unity it is the endeavour of heretics to sever into many. Therefore we say, that the ancient and Catholic Church alone is one in essence, in opinion, in origin, and in excellence, one in faith H. — Of this church, the eminence, as well as the principle of its construction, arises from unity**; by this surpassing all * Itaquetotac tantce ecclesice, una est ilia ab apostolis prima , ex qua omnes. Sic omnes primas, et omnes apostolicx, dam unam omnes probant unitatem. f Una nobis et illisjides. X Una ecclesia sumus. Ita nostrum est, quodcunque nostrorum est. § (juccv hvat ty\v dhnQn iiotM(rtav.— 5 Kara snivoiav //.ovw iivai qa^iv rm a^xMctv kou xaQotutw batiwiav, hi ivorrrra 7ri<7TEu$. ** n Hoxn Ty$ EKK>wta$ — xara tyiv (Aovafa £ 899, 900. He elsewhere defines the church to be " a people collected into one faith * from the Jews and Gentiles " — and after- wards adds : " Thus they both arrive at the unity of faith i."--Ibid. L. vi. p. 736, 793. Cent. III. Origen, G. C. <; As they shall not possess the kingdom of God, who have been defiled by fornication, other impurities and the wor.-hip of idols; so neither shall 110^^8+.' ' — Horn, inep' ad Tit. apud Pamphylum ApoL T. 1. p. 481. Edit. Genebrardi. — "Should any one be found, not hastening, not betaking himself to the walled cities, that is, shall not have entered into the churches of God, but have remained without, he shall perish in the hands of the enemy." Horn. v. in Jerem. T. iii. p. 161. — Edit. Paris 1733. — " Let no one persuade, no one deceive himself: out of this house, that is, out of the Church, is no salvation §. He that shall go out, becomes guilty of his own death." Horn. iv. in Jpsue. T. ii. p. 404. S. Cyprian, L. C» "The church is one||, wide- ly extended by its fecundity : as there are many rays of * SIS TW fjLlUV TTKTTIV ffUVayOfA£VO$ >&0$. t Stws ay/pa ei$ jr\v homra tuj ttio-tms HaravTcaartv. % Ita et hi qui in hizrcsim declzna-verunt.— § Extra Eccltsiam nemo sakatur,-- |) Ecctaia una est. ( S9 ) light, but one sun ; many branches of a tree, but one root deeply fixed ; many streams of water, but one source. Take a ray from the sun ; the unity of light allows not divi- sion : break a branch from the tree, the branch cannot ger- minate : cut off the stream from its source; the stream dries up. So the church— sends forth her rays over the whole earih : yet is the light one — and its unity is undi- vided*." De Unitate Ecclesice, p. WS. Ed. Oxon. 1682. " He th t does not hold this unity of the church, can he think that he holds the faith ? he that opposes and withstands the church, can he trust that he is in the churcli ? When the blessed Paul teaches the same tiling and shews the sacred character of unity, saying, (Ephes. iv. 4, 5, 6.) one body and one spirit, 8fc. which unity, it is our duty firmly to hold and to vindicate t." Ibid, Whoever, separated from the church, is joined to an adultress, is cut off from the promises of the church. Who deserts the church of Christ, obtains not the rewards of Christ. He is an alien, he is profane, he is an enemy. He cannot have God for a father, who has not the church for his mother. If excluded from the ark of Noah, any one might have escaped ; so may he if out of the church J. The Lord admonishes and says : He that is not with me is against me. (Mat. xii. 30.) Who violates the peace of Christ and concord, is against him. The Lord says : land the Father are one, (John x. SO.) And again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost it is written; And these three are one, (1 John v. 7.) Whoholds not this unity, holds not • Unum lumen est, quod ubique diffunditur, nee unitas corporis separator. f Hanc Ecclesia unitatem qui non tenet, tenere sejidem credit ? qui Ecclesice renititur et resistit, in Ecclesia se esse conjidit ? Quam unitatem firmiter tenere, et vindicare debemus, % Si potuit evadere quisquam qui extra arcam Noefuit, et qui extra Ecclesiamf oris fuer it, evadet, c 4 ( 40 ) the law of God, nor the faith of the Father and the Son, nor the truth that is to salvation *." Ibid. p. 109. Having, after this, shewn, that by the seamless garment of Christ, was represented the unity of the church, S. Cyprian adds : " Who is so wicked and perfidious, who so trans- ported by the rage of discord, as to think, that the unity of God, the vesture of the Lord, the church of Christ, may be severed? Christ tells us in his gospel: There-shall be onejlock and one shepherd. (John x. 16.) Does any one then imagine, that in the same place, may be many shep- herds, and many flocks +? The apostle also, urging the same unity, entreats and admonishes, saying : ( 1 Cor. i. 10.> Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no schisms among yow yi Ibid. p. 110. " God is one, and Christ is one, and his Church is one, and faith is one, and his people, connected by one solid bond, is one. Unity cannot be severed +; nor the one body, by laceration, be divided. Whatever is separated from the stock, cannot live ; cannot breathe apart : it loses the substance of life." Ibid. p. 119. S. Dionysius of Alexandria^ G. C. Writing to Novatian, the schismatic, he says: " You * Hanc unitatem qui non tenet, Dei legem non tenet ; veritatem non tenet ad salutem. f Et esse posse uno in loco aliquis existimat aut multos pastores, aut plures greges f + Et una ecclesia ejus et fides una, etplebs in solidam corporis unita- tem copulata. Scindi unitas non potest. The whole treatise might be cited, which, in every line, expresses a horror of schism, and a love of unity and concord. § He was catechist of the same church of Alexandria, as ( 41 ) ought rather to have suffered all things, than have raised a sell ism in the church. To die in defence of its unity would be as glorious, as laying down one's life rather than sacrifice to idols ; and, in my opinion, more glorious;* be- cause here the safety of the whole church is consulted.— -If you bring your brethren to union, this will overbalance your fault, which will be forgotten, and you will receive commendation. If you cannot gain others, at least save your own soul." Apud. Euseb* Hist. EccU Z». vi. c. 45. p. 318. Cantabrigice 1720. Cent. IV. LactantiuSy L. C. " The Catholic Church alone retains the true worship. (See the passage at p. 17.) S. Alexander, Patriarch of Alexan- dria,^ G. C* He writes to his u fellow-ministers of the Catholic Church :"— " As the body of the Catholic S. Clement had been, and succeeded to the see about 247- He is spoken of by the early ecclesiastical writers, as highly illustrious for his learning, and the zeal with which he defended the Catho- lic cause. Of his works, however, which were numerous, enough only remaihs, chiefly in fragments, to make us regret their loss. He died about the year 264. * e$ei ?rav onxv TraQeiv, vtte^ ru (j.n tiieutofyau tw ixxXmtav th 6ex, km w &k afrolioTifx Ty$ evekev ts fin cx^ai (laviv^ia^ hoit's/ie $E HOCl fl£l£uV. t He succeeded Achillas in 321, if not in 315. He vigorously opposed the heresy of Arius from its birth, and excommunicated its author, and his abettors. He assisted at the council of Nice in 325, and died in the same vear. ( 42 > Church is one*, and the Scriptures command, that we main- tain i he bond of peace and concord, it is proper, that, in re- gard to all things that are done among us, we should con- dole, or rejoice with one another." Apud Socrat* JL. 1. c. vi. p. 10. Edit. Cantab. 1720. Speaking of the Arians, he says : " That seamless garment, which the murderers of Christ would not divide, these men have dared to rip asun- der, t" Apud. Theodortt. L.l.c. iv. p. 9. Edit. Cantab. 1720. Council ofNice.% G. C. " But as to those per- sons who — are found not to have declined to any schism, and to have kept themselves uncontaminated within the Catholic and Apostolic Church, they have a right to or- dain," &c. Gen. Cone. T. ii. p. 250. Edit. Paris, 1671. Constantine the Great, who himself had called the bishops together at Nice in Bithynia, in a letter to the bishops who were not present at the council, says: u What I chiefly proposed to myself was, that one belief, sincere affection, and uniformity of worship towards the Almighty Being should be maintained." Ibid. p. 263. — In another letter to the church of Alexandria, where Arius§ had first broached his new doctrines, the same emperor attests, that more than three hundred bishops, who were remarkable for their modesty and learning, pro- + rov af fuxTOV x iruvoc ^X l(rai irotyir.trxv, X Held in 325, to declare the faith of the church, in oppo- sition to the errors of Arius. About 318 bishops assisted at it, besides priests and deacons. § A priest of Alexandria, whose followers were called Arians. ( 4S ) claimed, at Nice, with one voice, one and the same faith *; and that Arius alone was found to dissent from it.'* Ibid, p. 62. And yet in a letter to Constantine, this heretic pro- fesses his belief, u in the one Catholic Church of God, reaching from one extremity of the earth to the other." Ibid, p. 464. EusebiuSy G. C. Speaking of the deaths of the martyrs of Lyons, he says : " Having loved peace, and re- commended the same to us, they went to God in peace, leaving behind them, not grief to their mother, not discord to their brethren, but joy, and peace, and concord, and char ty to all." Hist. Eccl. L. v. c. 1 1, p. 212. Edit. Cantab. 1720. — " Then are his garments divided, and lots cast for his coat, when each one corrupts and tears the beauty of his word, that is, the expressions of the Holy Scriptures, and entertains such opinions as are usually advanced by he* retics." Demon. Evang. L. x. p. 506. Paris. 1628. S. Athanasius, G. C. " The Gentiles, who disagree among themselves, are deprived of the true doc- trine. But the saints, and they, who are the preachers of truth, are unanimous. They lived, indeed, at different times ; but the object of all was the same ; for they were the prophets of the one God, and they announced, witli one consent t, the same word of truth.' ' Ep. de Decret Nicazn. S. Hilary, L. C. "Though the church of the world be one; yet each city has its church. It is one in * fjLiav fcai rw avrnv wurriv. ( 44 ) all*; for though there arc many, it is one in many." Com- ment, in Psal. xiv, p. 62. " Since the church founded by Christ, and strengthened by the Apostles, is onet, from which error has madly cut itself off ; and it cannot be de- nied, that the separation has arisen from a sinister under- standing, while, what is read, is made subservient to the apprehension, and not this to the words : still a general opposition every where prevails. Wherefore, all heretics advance against the church ; but while they oppose each other, their gain is nothing. It is the Church that triumphs over all — their mutual opposition strengthens our faith. +" De Trin. L. vii. p. 917.— " As their mind and heart were one, I ask, did this arise from unity of belief? Truly. Again I ask; is faith necessarily one? It is §; the Apostle teaching, (Ephes. iv.) one faith, one Lord, one baptism^ one hope, and one God." Ibid. L. viii.^. 951. Lucifer, bishop of Cagliari,\\ L. C- He states that Arius and other heretics, who had preceded him, were cut off from the church, " because they left the failh, which the patriarchs, prophets, apostles, and martyrs had maintained;" and then adds: " How can we Christians acquiesce with you, and desert what the apostles deli- vered ?" — Again afterwards: M From you, not believing, • Una in omnibus est. f Cum ecclesia una omnium sit. \ Fidem nostram f dum sibi adversantur, affirmant. § Utrum fides una, anne altera sit f Una certe. || He flourished about the middle of the fourth century, and was one of the most zealous defenders of S. Athanasius. He died in 371. ( 45 ) as the people of God believe; not teaching, as the apostles of Christ taught; not submitting to the sound words of the Lord, we have judged it proper to separate ourselves." Throughout the whole book he inveighs, with great vehe- mence, against heresy. Ad Constantium Imp. L. un. Bibl. PP. T. iv. p. 222, 224, 225. S. Hasil, G. C. " We, indeed, ourselves are of little value ; but, by the grace of God, we remain ever the same, unaffected by the common changes of things. Our belief is not one at Seleucia, and another at Constantinople; one at Lampsacus, and another at Rome ; and so different from what it was in former times, but always one and the lame*." Ep. 251. ad Ercesinos. T. iii. p. 386. Edit. Bened. Parisiis, 1721. — "As many as hope in Christ, are one people, and they, who are of Christ, form one church t , though it be named in many places." Ep. 161. ad Amphil T. iii. p. 252. — a It is more just to judge of our concerns, not from this or that man,who walk not in truth ; but from the number of bishops, who, in all regions, are united to us. Let the ci- ties of Asia— the sound part of Egypt, and of Syria, be in- terrogated. These by letter communicate with us, and we with them. From these you may learn, that we are all unanimous; all think the same thing J. Wherefore, he, who declines our communion, may be considered by you, as separated from the universal church. — It is better we should lose our lives, and that the churches should remain unanimous^, than that, on account of our childish feuds, * ateu fjua kai r\ aum aet. t h^ %ao^ m - . .Hcct fjua sKx\rma. J in a-ufi^uxoi 7ravTE$ h/xEVy to Iv os attorns* ( 46 ) the faithful should be so much injured." — Ep. 204. ad Neocces. T, iii. p. 307. S. Cyril of Jerusalem, G. C. "Uphold the faith, and that faith alone, which is now delivered to thee by the church *, confirmed, as it is, by all the Scriptures," Cat. v, n. 7. p. 75. " We declare the ways of error, that we may proceed on one royal roadt. M Cat xvi. n 5. p. 226. 4( As far as our time of instruction would allow, we have spoken to you of that holy and apostolic faitn ; which was delivered to you." Cat. xviii. n. 14. p. 274. S. Ephrem of Edessa. G. C. " Blessed is the man, who has chosen the Catholic Church. — They shall be deemed deserving of punishment, who think of sowing the seeds of separation in the breasts of men. — Quit not then this Catholic faith, nor fall from it, should any question or schism ari&e.J" In Testam, T. iii. p,296. Edit. Vo>sii. — " The assembly of the good detests those appellations, which are derived from men : wherefore the Sabellians and Arians, and other sectaries, displeased with the names which their respective authors have given to them, craftily aim to decorate themselves with the name of our church, and to please her. They are aware, who they are whom she * /U0V»V TYiV V7T0 TMJ EHX*Wta$ vrOfa&ifropmV '. t Iva piav c3bv fteurihixrw odevuo-fuv. J t>i$ Ha6o7\a (An ekcttute mo-reus — jtojfe TragagfunTe a^auTn^ Iv rm ho-ray/xa) — Edit Oxford, 1700. p. 373, 374-. I quote the the Greek translation of S. Ephrem, hecause it was made during his life, and is probably that, which S. Jerom says, was publicly read in churches; and therefore may be deemed of almost equal authority with the original. { 47 ) loves, and that she rests wholly on Christ. — Have they not read, how the Apostle blamed those, who said they were the followers of Paul, or of Apollos, or of Cephas ? But a more bitter cause of grief has assailed us, since some of our own standing have given their names to their followers.— Blessed be that name wherein we were called Consider, therefore, on which side is the doctrine of the Apostles, They gave no names ; and where it is done, there is a de- parture from their rule. On the other hand, we declare, that, truth will be found with those, who are known by the name of Christ alone." Serm. xxiv. Adv. H ceres, p. 493. T. iv. Edit. Quirbii. S. Pacianus*, L. C. " The Church is the body of Christ, (Col. i. 24.) the body, not a member. The body from many parts, and many members, formed into one, as the Apostle says (1 Cor. 12, 14.) for the body is not one member, but many. The Church, there- fore, is the complete body, the entire body, now diffused through the whole world. As a city, I say, whose parts are united into one ; not, as you Novatians are, a small, but insolent portion, a collection of mushrooms, disjoined from the body.— The church is without spot, or wrinkle, that is, not deformed by heresies. It is the heretic that cu(s, and disfigures, and rumples the garment of Christ, that is, his church."^ Ep. iii. ad. Sympron. Bibl. Max. Patrum, T. iv. p. 310. Lugduni, 1677. * He was bishop of Barcelona in Spain, and died about the year 380, leaving some tracts, principally against the Novatian heretics, who denied to the church the power of forgiving sins, and of receiving sinners, who had fallen during persecution, how- ever penitent they might be. S. Jerom says of him, that he was famous for the purity of his manners, and the eloquence of his discourses. f Hareses non habeas. Hareticus vesteai Domini ', Eccksiam Christi, scindit, intcrcipit, vitiat, irruaat. ( 48 ) Council of Constantinople, G. C* In this century, in the year 381, was celebrated at Con- stantinople, the second general council, the object of which meeting was, to confirm what had previously been done at Nice, in 325, and to condemn the error of Macedonius, who had denied the divinity of the Holy Ghost. To the creed of Nice they added some clauses, among which is that: « f And one holy Catholic and Apostolic church. " This was the declared faith of the 150 bishops th.^re assembled ; and though they were all of the Greek church, yet was their creed received in the west ; and it continues, to this day, to be recited in all churches, under the name of the Nicene creed. The fathers, in giving an account of their proceedings to the western church, conclude in these words : ic The doctrine of faith being thus established by common consent, and Christian charity ruling within us, let us hence cease to say, what was censured by the Apostle (K Cor, i. Y2.)i I am of Paul, and I am of Jpollos, and J of Ce- phas; and having shewn, that we are all of Christ, who in us is not divided, we shall preserve inviolate, by the grace of God, the body of the church*, and stand with confidence before the tribunal of the Lord." Ep. ad Da- masum. Cone. Gen. T. 2. p. 965. Ed. Lutetioz Pari riorum 1671. S. Optatus of Milevis^ L. C. "The church is one,^*' he says to Parmenianus, the schismatical t Milevis was a city of Africa, of which S. Optatus wa» bishop, about the middle of the fourth century. The work I quote was written against the Donatists, in 7 books, addressed to Parmenianus, a bishop of that sect It abounds with innumerable passages in favour of the unity and other marks of the true church. I Ecclcsia una est. ( 49 ) bishop, to whotn he writes, tc which Jesus Christ calls his dove, his spouse; and this one church cannot be among all heretics and schismatics.* It 'must then be in one place; and this, you pretend, is, where you would have it to be, that is, in one corner of Africa ; not with us, who occupy the remaining portion ; nor, if we pass over all the regions of the earth, can the church, it seems, be found, but where you arc. Then, where is the propriety of the word Catho- lic, which has been given to the Church? And if it must be confined to your narrow limits ; if you exclude all nations from it ; where is the truth of the promise made to Christ in the psalm: (Ps. ii.) / will give thee the nations for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession? Allow the Son to enjoy his inheritance : allow the Father to fulfd his promise. — Why will you piit boundaries ; lay down limits i< — You cannot deny, that S. Peter, the chief of the apostles, established an episcopal chair at Rome : this chair was one, that all others might preserve unity, by the union which they had with it : so, that whoever set up a chair against it, should be a schism- atic, and an offender. t It was in this one chair, which is the first mark of the church, that S. Peter sat." De Schism. Donat. L. ii. p. 25, 26, 27. Edit. Paris. 1700. S. A.mbroseiyX L. C* Commenting on the words * Apud omnes liareticos et schismatic^ esse mm potest. f Utjam schismaticus, et peccator esset, qui contra singularefn cutkedram alteram collocareL \ He died in the year 396, having held the see of Milan twenty years, with great profit to the church ; edified by his exalted virtues the western provinces, and instructed them by his writings. These are numerous, comprising, CQ?nmentaries,on many parts of Scripture, and moral Treatises. ( 50 ) of the Apostle to the Ephesians, c. iv. v. 4. One body and one spirit, as you are called in one hope of your calling 9 he says : "To promote peace and concord, Paul added this ; that, as the church is one body, so the people should culti- vate union ; for the object of our belief is one : One Lord 9 one faith, one baptism, one God and father of all. Again he commends unity, that, as we are called to unity, we should dissent in nothing.* For if there be ono Lord, that is, one Christ ; one faith, and one baptism, one God and father of all — the mind also should be one, and the heart of the people one +, since all the things that he enumerates, are instances of unity ; for they agree in all things." Com. in c* iv. ep, adEphes.% T. iii. p. 503. Edit. Paris. 1614. In a discourse on the death of his brother Satyrus, having related his escape from a storm, and ihe anxious desire he felt to return solemn thanks to God, S. Ambrose adds : a When he got to land, he sent for the bishop of the place ; but aware, that true faith alone was acceptable to heaven, he enquired of him, was he in communion with the Catholic bishops, that is, with the Roman bishop?^ for the country, he knew, was infected with schism. The bishop, al the time, had withdrawn himself from our communion, and though he was in banishment for his faith, yet in schism there could be no true faith. || He * Unitatem commendat, ut in nullo dissenliamus. f Unus debet esse et animus et cor poptdi. X This commentary on the epistles of S. Paul, though pub- lished among the works of S. Ambrose, is generally believed not to have been written by him, but by his contemporary Ililarius, a Roman deacon. § Utrumnam cum Episcopis Catholicism hoc est cum Roman* ec- 'tksia convenirct. H j\un putaiitfidem esse in schismate; ( 51 ) had faith towards God, but not towards the Church, whose members he permitted to be torn asunder. For since Christ died for the church and the church is the body of Christ, they, by whom his passion is made void, and his body is torn asunder, cannot hold his faith. How desirous soever, therefore, my brother might be to express publicly his gratitude, he chose to defer it ; because he knew, that true faith was necessary for its due accomplishment." — De Obitu fratris Sati/ri ; T. iv. p. 316. — I have mentioned this fact, because it shews, more than any reasoning on the subject of union could do, how great was the horror then entertained of schism, or of departing from the faith of the church. S. EpiphanhlSf G. C- " For tlie church, taking her origin from one faith, and established by the Divine Spirit, is the only child of her mother.* They that have come out after hi r, or even before her, are called har- lots : which, though they be not quite cut off from her inheritance, yet they have no dowry from Christ ; no in- fluence from the Holy Ghost. There remains only one, namely, the holy Catholic church, t which is truly called the Christian religion. — To this church, all thi*y, who, at any time, pleased God, have given their faith.'' — In exposit. jideu Ad calcem L. adv. liter. T. i. p. 1083. S. Jerom, L. C. " I know, that the Church is founded upon Peter, that is, on a rock. Whoever eateth the Iamb out of that house, is a profane man. Who- * ixxxwix iemv ano fua$ marsus yeysvQfxtvn. /ju» tv pew xai fiia rri yeysmxv 1 ?* D 3 ( 52 ) ever is not in the ark, shall perish by the flood*." Ep. lvii. ad Dam. T. 1. p. 604. — 4KYi$ km a7ro