UCSB LIBRARY y~ -79 5^^ AN ESSAY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHEISTTAN DOCTEINE AN ESSAY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE JOHN HENKY CARDINAL NEWMAN FOVRTEENm IMPRESSION LONGMANS, GEEBN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA 1909 All rights reserve* TO THE REV. SAMUEL WILLIAM WAYTE, B.D. PRESIDENT OP TRINITY COLLEGE, OXPOED. MY DEAR PRESIDENT, NOT from any special interest which I anticipate you will take in this Volume, or any sympathy you will feel in its argument, or intrinsic fitness of any kind in my associating you and your Fellows with it, But, because I have nothing besides it to offer you, in token of my sense of the gracious compliment which you and they have paid me in making me once more a Member of a College dear to me from Undergraduate memories ; Also, because of the happy coincidence, that whereas its first publication was contemporaneous with my leaving Oxford, its second becomes, by virtue of your act, contemporaneous with a recovery of my position there : Y! DEDICATION. Therefore it is that, without your leave or your responsibility, I take the bold step of placing your name in the first pages of what, at my age, I must consider the last print or reprint on which I shall ever be engaged. I am. my dear President, Most sincerely yours, JOHN H. NEWMAN. February 23, 1878. PEEFACE TO THE EDITION OF 1878. THE following pages were not in the first instance written to prove the divinity of the Catholic Eeligion, though ultimately they furnish a positive argument in its behalf, but to explain certain difficulties in its history, felt before now by the author himself, and commonly insisted on by Protestants in controversy, as serving to blunt the force of its primd facie and general claims on our recognition. However beautiful and promising that Keligion is in theory, its history, we are told, is its best refutation ; the inconsistencies, found age after age in its teaching, being as patent as the simultaneous contrarieties of religious opinion manifest in the High, Low, and Broad branches of the Church of England. In reply to this specious objection, it is maintained in this Essay that, granting that some large variations of teaching in its long course of 1800 years exist, never- theless, these, on examination, will be found to arise from the nature of the case, and to proceed on a law, and with a harmony and a definite drift, and with viii PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. an analogy to Scripture revelations, which, instead of telling to their disadvantage, actually constitute an argu- ment in their favour, as witnessing to a superintending Providence and a great Design in the mode and in the circumstances of their occunrence. Perhaps his confidence in the truth and availableness of this view has sometimes led the author to be careless and over-liberal in his concessions to Protestants of historical fact. If this be so anywhere, he begs the reader in such cases to understand him as speaking hypothetically, and in the sense of an argumentum ad hominem and a fortiori, Nor is such hypothetical reasoning out of place in a publication which is addressed, not to theologians, but to those who as yet are not even Catholics, and who, as they read history, would scoff at any defence of Catholic doctrine which did not go the length of covering admissions in matters of fact as broad as those which are here ventured on. la this new Edition of the Essay various important alterations have been made in the arrangement of its separate parts, and some, not indeed in its matter, but in its text. February 2, 1878. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE FIRST EDITION. OCULI MEI DEFECERUNT IN SALUTARE TUUM. IT is now above eleven years since the writer of the following pages, in one of the early Numbers of the Tracts for the Times, expressed himsejf thus : " Considering the high gifts, and the strong claims of the Church of Rome and her dependencies on our admiration, reverence, love, and gratitude, how could we withstand her, as we do ; how could we refrain from being melted into tenderness, and rushing into communion with her, but for ths words of Truth, which bid us prefer Itself to the whole world? 'He that loveth father or mother more than Me, is not worthy of Me.' How could we learn to be severe, and execute judgment, but for the warning of Moses against even a divinely-gifted teacher who should preach new gods, and the anathema of St. Paul even against Angels and Apostles who should bring in a new doctrine?" l He little thought, when he so wrote, that the time would ever come when he should feel the obstacle, which he spoke of as lying in the way of communion with the Church of Rome, to be destitute of solid foundation. The following work is directed towards its removal. Having, in former publications, called attention to the 1 Records of the Church, xxfv. p. 7. X ADVERTISEMENT TO THE FIRST EDITION, supposed difficulty, he considers himself bound to avow his present belief that it is imaginary. He has neither the ability to put out of hand a finished composition, nor the wish to make a powerful and moving representation, on the great subject of which he treats. His aim will be answered, if he succeeds in suggesting thoughts, which in God's good time may quietly bear fruit, in the minds of those to whom that subject is new; and which may carry forward inquirers, who have already put themselves on the course. If at times his tone appears positive or peremptory, he hopes this will be imputed to the scientific character of the Work, which requires a distinct statement of principles, and of the arguments which recommend them. He hopes too he shall be excused for his frequent quotations from himself; which are necessary in order to show how he stands at present in relation to various of his former Publications. * * * LlTTLEMORE, October 6, 1845. POSTSCRIPT. Since the above was written, the Author has joined the Catholic Church. It was his intention and wish to have carried his Volume through the Press before deciding ADVERTISEMENT TO THE FIRST EDITION. XI finally on this step. But when he had got some way in the printing, ho recognized in himself a conviction of the truth of the conclusion to which the discussion leads, so clear as to supersede further deliberation. Shortly after- wards circumstances gave him the opportunity of acting upon it, and he felt that he had no warrant for refusing to do so. His first act on his conversion was to offer his Work for revision to the proper authorities ; but the offer was declined on the ground that it was written and partly printed before he was a Catholic, and that it would come before the reader in a more persuasive form, if he read it as the author wrote it. It is scarcely necessary to add that he now submits every part of the book to the judgment of the Church, with whose doctrine, on the subjects of which he treats, he wishes all his thoughts to be coincident. CONTENTS. T1J /T\ PAET I. DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENTS VIEWED IN THEMSELVES. PAGE INTRODUCTION ....' 3 CHAPTER I. The Development of Ideas ........ 83 Section 1. The Process of Development in Ideas ... 83 Section 2. The Kinds of Development in Ideas ... 41 CHAPTER II. The Antecedent Argument in behalf of Developments in Christian Doctrine 55 Section 1. Developments to be expected 55 Section 2. An infallible Developing Authority to be expected 75 Section 3. The existing Developments of Doctrine the prob- able Fulfilment of that Expectation 92 CHAPTER III. The Historical Argument in behalf of the existing Developments 99 Section 1. Method of Proof 99 Section 2. State of the Evidence 110 XIV CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. PAGE Instances in Illustration , . . 122 Section 1. Instances cursorily noticed 123 1. Canon of the New Testament 123 2. Original Sin . 126 3. Infant Baptism v 127 4. Communion in one kind ..,..-. 129 5. The Homoiision 133 Section 2. Our Lord's Incarnation, and the dignity of His Mother and of all Saints ....... 135 Section 3. Papal Supremacy ..., 148 PAET H. DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENTS VIEWED EELATIVELY TO DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS. CHAPTER V. Genuine Developments contrasted with Corruptions . . . 169 Section 1. First Note of a genuine Development of an Idea : Preservation of its Type : 171 Section 2. Second Note : Continuity of its Principles . . 178 Section 3. Third Note : Its Power of Assimilation . . . 185 Section 4. Fourth Note : Its Logical Sequence . . . 189 Section 5. Fifth Note : Anticipation of its Future . . . 195 Section 6. Sixth Note : Conservative Action upon its Past . 199 Section 7. Seventh Note : Its Chronic Vigour .... 203 CHAPTER VI. Application of the First Note of a true Development to tha Existing Developments of Christian Doctrine : Preservation of its Type 207 CONTENTS. XV TAGE Section 1. The Church of the First Centuries . . . . 208 Section 2. The Church of the Fourth Century . . . 248 Section 3. The Church of the Fifth and Sixth Centuries . 273 CHAPTER VII. Application of the Second : Continuity of its Principles . . . 323 1. Principles of Christianity . 323 2. Supremacy of Faith ...... 326 3. Theology .336 4. Scripture and its Mystical Interpretation . . 338 5. Dogma 846 6. Additional Remarks 853 CHAPTER VIII. Application of the Third : its Assimilative Power .... 855 1. The Assimilating Power of Dogmatic Truth . . 357 2. The Assimilating Power of Sacramental Grace . 368 CHAPTER IX. Application of the Fourth : its Logical Sequence .... 383 1. Pardons 384 2. Penances ......... S35 3. Satisfactions 836 4. Purgatory 388 5. Meritorious Works ....,., 393 6. The Monastic Rule ....... 395 CHAPTER X. Application of the Fifth : Anticipation of its Future . , . 400 1. Resurrection and Relics ...... 401 2. The Virgin Life ....... 407 3. Cultus of Saints and Angels > * 410 4. Office of the Blessed Virgin ..... 415 XVI CONTENTS. CHAPTER XI. PAGE Application of the Sixth : Conservative Action on its Past . . 419 Section 1. Instances cursorily noticed . . . . , . 420 Section 2. Devotion to the Blessed Virgin , , , 425 CHAPTER XIL Application of the Seventh : its Chronic Vigour ... t 437 CONCLUSION , .445 PART L DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENTS VIEWED IN THEMSELVES. INTRODUCTION. CHRISTIANITY has been long enough, in the world to justify us in dealing with it as a fact in the world's history. Its genius and character, its doctrines, precepts, and objects cannot be treated as matters of private opinion or deduction, unless we may reasonably so regard the Spartan institutions or the religion of Mahomet. It may indeed legitimately be made the subject-matter of theories ; what is its moral and political excellence, what its due location in the range of ideas or of facts which we possess, whether it be divine or human, whether original or eclectic, or both at once, how far favourable to civilization or to literature, whether a religion for all ages or for a particular state of society, these are questions upon the fact, or professed solutions of the fact, and belong to the province of opinion ; but to a fact do they relate, on an admitted fact do they turn, which must be ascertained as other facts, and surely has on the whole been so ascertained, unless the testimony of so many centuries is to go for nothing. Christianity is no theory of the study or the cloister. It has long since passed beyond the letter of documents and the reasonings of individual minds, and has become public property. Its " sound has gone out into all lands," and its " words unto the ends of the world." It has from the first had an objective existence, B 2 4 INTRODUCTION. and has thrown itself upon the great concourse of men. Its home is in the world ; and to know what it is, we must seek it in the world, and hear the world's witness of it. 2. The hypothesis, indeed, has met with wide reception in these latter times, that Christianity does not fall within the province of history, that it is to each man what each man thinks it to be, and nothing else ; and thus in fact is a mere name for a cluster or family of rival religions all together, religions at variance one with another, and claiming the same appellation, not because there can be assigned any one and the same doctrine as the common foundation of all, but because certain points of agreement may be found here and there of some sort or other, by which each in its turn is connected with one or other of the rest. Or again, it has been maintained, or implied, that all existing denominations of Christianity are wrong, none representing it as taught by Christ and His Apostles ; that the original religion has gradually decayed or become hopelessly corrupt ; nay that it died out of the world at its birth, and was forthwith succeeded by a counterfeit or counterfeits which assumed its name, though they inherited at best but some fragments of its teaching ; or rather that it cannot even be said either to have decayed or to have died, because historically it has no substance of its own, but from the first and onwards it has, on the stage of the world, been nothing more than a mere assemblage of doctrines and practices derived from without, from Oriental, Platonic, Polytheistic sources, from Buddhism, Essenism, Manicheeism ; or that, allowing true Christianity still to exist, it has but a hidden and isolated life, in the hearts of the elect, or again as a literature or philosophy, not certified in any way, much less guaranteed, to come from above, but one out of the various separate informa- ttftRObtJCTlOtt. 5 tions about the Supreme Being and human duty, with which an unknown Provideuce has furnished us, whether in nature or in the world. 3. All such views of Christianity imply that there is no sufficient body of historical proof to interfere with, or at least to prevail against, any number whatever of free and independent hypotheses concerning it. But this surely is not self-evident, and has itself to be proved. Till positive reasons grounded on facts are adduced to the contrary, the most natural hypotheses, the most agreeable to our mode of proceeding in parallel coses, and that which takes pre- cedence of all others, is to consider that the society of Christians, which the Apostles left on earth, were of that religion to which the Apostles had converted them ; that the external continuity of name, profession, and com- munion, argues a real continuity of doctrine ; that, as Christianity began by manifesting itself as of a certain shape and bearing to all mankind, therefore it went on so to manifest itself; and that the more, considering that prophecy had already determined that it was to be a power visible in the world and sovereign over it, characters which are accurately fulfilled in that historical Christianity to which we commonly give the name. It is not a violent assumption, then, but rather mere abstinence from the wanton admission of a principle which would necessarily lead to the most vexatious and preposterous scepticism, to take it for granted, before proof to the contrary, that the Christianity of the second, fourth, seventh, twelfth, sixteenth, and intermediate centuries is in its substance the very religion which Christ and His Apostles taught in the first, whatever may be the modifications for good or for evil which lapse of years, or the vicissisudes of human affairs, have impressed upon it. 6 IKTRODUCTTON. Of course I do not deny the abstract possibility of ex- treme changes. The substitution is certainly, in idea, supposable of a counterfeit Christianity, superseding the original, by means of the adroit innovations of seasons, places, and persons, till, according to the familiar illustra- tion, the "blade" and the "handle" are alternately renewed, and identity is lost without the loss of continuity. It is possible ; but it must not be assumed. The onuspro- bandi is with those who assert what it is unnatural to expect ; to be just able to doubt is no warrant for disbelieving. 4. Accordingly, some writers have gone on to give reasons from history for their refusing to appeal to history. They aver that, when they come to look into the documents and literature of Christianity in times past, they find its doctrines so variously represented, and so inconsistently maintained by its professors, that, however natural it be a priori, it is useless, in fact, to seek in history the matter of that Revelation which has been vouchsafed to mankind ; that they cannot be historical Christians if they would. They say, in the words of Chillingworth, " There are popes against popes, councils against councils, some fathers against others, the same fathers a gainst themselves, a consent of fathers of one age against a consent of fathers of another age, the Church of one age against the Church of another age : " Hence they are forced, whether they will or not, to fall back upon the Bible as the sole source of Revelation, and upon their own personal private judg- ment as the sole expounder of its doctrine. This is a fair argument, if it can be maintained, and it brings me at once to the subject of this Essay. Not that it enters into aay purpose to convict of misstatement, as might be done, each separate clause of this sweeping accusation of a smart but superficial writer ; but neither on the other hand do I INTRODUCTION. 7 mean to deny everything that he says to the disadvantage of historical Christianity. On the contrary, I shall admit that there are in fact certain apparent variations in its teaching, which have to be explained ; thus I shall begin, but then I shall attempt to explain them to the exculpa- tion of that teaching in point of unity, directness, and consistency. 5. Meanwhile, before setting about this work, I will address one remark to Chillingworth and his friends : Let them consider, that if they can criticize history, the facts of history certainly can retort upon them. It might, I grant, be clearer on this great subject than it is. This is no great concession. History is not a creed or a catechism, it gives lessons rather than rules ; still no one can mistake its general teaching in this matter, whether he accept it or stumble at it. Bold outlines and broad masses of colour rise out of the records of the past. They may be dim, they may be incomplete ; but they are definite. And this one thing at least is certain ; whatever history teaches, whatever it omits, whatever it exaggerates or extenuates, whatever it says and unsays, at least the Christianity of history is not Protestantism. If ever there were a safe truth, it is this. And Protestantism has ever felt it so. I do not mean that every writer on the Protestant side has felt it ; for it was the fashion at first, at least as a rhetorical argument against Rome, to appeal to past ages, or to some of them ; but Protestantism, as a whole, feels it, and has felt it. This is shown in the determination already referred to of dispensing with historical Christianity altogether, and of forming a Christianity from the Bible alone : men never would have put it aside, unless they had despaired of it. It is shown by the long neglect of ecclesiastical history in England, which prevails even in the English Church. 8 INTRODUCTION. Our popular religion scarcely recognizes the fact of the twelve long ages which lie between the Councils of Nicrca and Trent, except as affording one or two passages to illustrate its wild interpretations of certain prophesies of St. Paul and St. John. It is melancholy to say it, but the chief, perhaps the only English writer who has any claim to be considered an ecclesiastical historian, is the unbeliever Gibbon. To be deep in history is to cease to be a Protestant. 6. And this utter incongruity between Protestantism and historical Christianity is a plain fact, whether the latter be regarded in its earlier or in its later centuries. Pro- test:ints can as little bear its Ante-nicene as its Post tri- dentine period. I have elsewhere observed on this cir- cumstance : " So much must the Protestant grant that, if such a system of doctrine as he would now introduce ever existed in early times, it has been clean swept away as if by a deluge, suddenly, silently, and without memorial; by a deluge coming in a night, and utterly soaking, rot- ting, heaving up, arid hurrying off every vestige of what it found in the Church, before cock-crowing: BO that ' when they rose in the morning* her true seed ' were all dead corpses ' Nay dead and buried and without grave- stone. 'The waters went over them; there was not one of them left ; they sunk like lead in the mighty waters.' Strange antitype, indeed, to the early fortunes of Israel! then the enemy was drowned, and ' Israel saw them dead upon the sea-shore.' But now, it would seem, water proceeded as a flood ' out of the serpent's mouth,' and covered all the witnesses, so that not even their dead bodies lay in the streets of the great city/ Let him take which of his doctrines he will, his peculiar view of self-righteousness, of formality, of superstition ; his notion of faith, or of spirituality in religious worship ; his denial of the virtue of the sacraments, or of the ministerial com- mission, or of the visible Church ; or his doctrine of the divine efficacy of the Scriptures as the one appointed instrument of religious teaching ; and let him consider how far Antiquity, as it has come down to us, will counte- nance him in it. No ; he must allow that the alleged deluge has done its work; yes, and has in turn disap- peared itself; it has been swallowed up by the earth, mercilessly as itself was merciless." l That Protestantism, then, is not the Christianity of history, it is easy to determine, but to retort is a poor reply in controversy to a question of fact, and whatever be the violence or the exaggeration of writers like Chillingworth, if they have raised u real difliculty, it may claim a real answer, and we must determine whether on the one hand Christianity is still to represent to us a definite teaching from above, or whether on the other its utterances have been from time to time so strangely at variance, that we are necessarily thrown back on our own judgment indi- vidually to determine, what the revelation of God is, or rather if in fact there is, or has been, any revelation at all. 7. Here then I concede to the opponents of historical Christianity, that there are to be found, during the 1800 years through which it has lasted, certain apparent incon- sistencies and alterations in its doctrine and its worship, such as irresistibly attract the attention of all who inquire into it. They are not sufficient to interfere with the general character and course of the religion, but they raise the question how they came about, and what they mean, and have in consequence supplied matter for several hypotheses. l Church of the Fathers [Hist. Sketches, vol. i. p. 418]. 10 INTRODUCTION Of these otie is to the effect that Christianity has even changed from the first and ever accommodates itself to the circumstances of times and seasons ; but it is difficult to understand how such a view is compatible with the special idea of revealed truth, and in fact its advocates more or less abandon, or tend to abandon the supernatural claims of Christianity ; so it need not detain us here. A second and more plausible hypothesis is that of the Anglican divines, who reconcile and bring into shape the exuberant phenomena under consideration, by cutting off and casting away as corruptions all usages, ways, opinions, and tenets, which have not the sanction of primitive times. They maintain that history first presents to us a pure Christianity in East and West, and then a corrupt; and then of course their duty is to draw the line between what is corrupt and what is pure, and to determine the dates at which the various changes from good to bad were introduced. Such a principle of demarcation, available for the purpose, they consider they have found in the dictum of Vincent of Lcrins, that revealed and Apostolic doctrine is " quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus," a principle infallibly separating, on the whole field of his- tory, authoritative doctrine from opinion, rejecting what is faulty, and combining and forming a theology. That " Christianity is what has been held always, everywhere, and by all/' certainly promises a solution of the perplexi- ties, an interpretation of the meaning, of history. What can be more natural than that divines and bodies of men should speak, sometimes from themselves, sometimes from tradition ? what more natural than that individually they should say many things on impulse, or under excitement, or as conjectures, or in ignorance ? what more certain than that they must all have been instructed and catechized in the Creed of the Apostles ? what more evident than that what was their own would in its degree be peculiar, and INTRODUCTION. 11 differ from what was similarly private and personal in their brethren ? what more conclusive than that the doctrine that was common to all at once was not really their own, but public property in which they had a joint interest, and was proved by the concurrence of so many witnesses to have come from an Apostolical source ? Here, then, we have a short and easy method for bringing the various informations of ecclesiastical history under that antece- dent probability in its favour, which nothing but its actual variations would lead us to neglect. Here we have a precise and satisfactory reason why we should make much of the earlier centuries, yet pay no regard to the later, why we should admit some doctrines and not others, why we refuse the Creed of Pius IV. and accept the Thirty- nine Articles. 8. Such is the rule of historical interpretation which has been professed in the English school of divines ; and it contains a majestic truth, and offers an intelligible prin- ciple, and wears a reasonable air. It is congenial, or, as it may be said, native to the Anglican mind, which takes up a middle position, neither discarding the Fathers nor acknowledging the Pope. It lays down a simple rule by which to measure the value of every historical fact, as it comes, and thereby it provides a bulwark against Rome, while it opens an assault upon Protestantism. Such is its promise; but its difficulty lies in applying it in particular cases. The rule is more serviceable in determining what is not, than what is Christianity ; it is irresistible against Protestantism, and in one sense indeed it is irresistible against Rome also, but in the same sense it is irresistible against England. It strikes at Rome through England. It admits of being interpreted in one of two ways: if it be narrowed for the purpose of disproving the catho- licity of the Creed of Pope Pius, it becomes also an objec- tion to the Athanasian ; and if it be relaxed to admit the doctrines retained by the English Church, it no longer excludes certain doctrines of Home which that Church denies. It cannot at once condemn St. Thomas and St. Bernard, and defend St. Athanasius and St. Gregory Nazianzen. This general defect in its serviccableness has been here- tofore felt by those who appealed to it. It was said by one writer ; " The Rule of Vincent is not of a mathematical or demonstrative character, but moral, and requires practical judgment and good sense to apply it. For instance, what is meant by being 'taught always' ? docs it mean in every century, or every year, or every month ? Does ' everywhere ' mean in every country, or in every diocese? and does 'the Consent of Fathers' require us to produce the direct testimony of every one of them? How many Fathers, how many places, how many instances, con- stitute a fulfilment of the test proposed ? It is, then, from the nature of the case, a condition which never can be satisfied as fully as it might have been. It admits of various and unequal application in various instances; and what degree of application is enough, must be decided by the same principles which guide us in the conduct of life, which determine us in politics, or trade, or war, which lead us to accept Revelation at all, (for which we have but probability to show at most,) nay, to believe in the existence of an intelligent Creator." * 9. So much was allowed by this writer ; but then he added : " This character, indeed, of Vincent's Canon, will but recommend it to the disciples of the school of Butler, from Proph. Office [Via Media, vol. i. pp. 55, 56]. INTRODUCTION. 18 its agreement with the analogy of nature ; but it affords a ready loophole for such as do not wish to be persuaded, of which both Protestants and Romanists are not slow to avail themselves." This surely is the language of disputants who are more intent on assailing others than on defending themselves ; as if similar loopholes were not necessary for Anglican theology. He elsewhere says : " What there is not the shadow of a reason for saying that the Fathers held, what has not the faintest pretensions of being a Catholic truth, is this, that St. Peter or his successors were and are universal Bishops, that they have the whole of Christendom for their one diocese in a way in which other Apostles and Bishops had and have not." ' Most true, if, in order that a doctrine be considered Catholic, it must be formally stated by the Fathers generally from the very first ; but, on the same understanding, the doctrine also of the apostolical succes- sion in the episcopal order " has not the faintest pretensions of being a Catholic truth." Nor was this writer without a feeling of the special difficulty of his school ; and he attempted to meet it by denying it. He wished to maintain that the sacred doctrines admitted by the Church of England into her Articles were taught in primitive times with a distinctness which no one could fancy to attach to the characteristic tenets of Rome. " We confidently affirm/' he said in another publication* " that there is not an article in the Athanasian Creed con- cerning the Incarnation which is not anticipated in the controversy with the Gnostics. There is no question which the Apollinurian or the Nestorian heresy raised, which may not be decided in the words of Ignatius, Ireneeus and Tertullian." 4 8 [Ibid. p. 181.] * [British Critic, July, 1836, p. 193 Vid. snpr. vol. 5. p. 130.] 1*4 INTRODUCTION. 10. This may be considered as true. It may be true also, or at least shall here be granted as true, that there is also a consensus in the Ante-nicene Church for the doctrines of our Lord's Consubstantiality and Coeternity with the Almighty Father. Let us allow that the whole circle of doctrines, of which our Lord is the subject, was consistently and uniformly confessed by the Primitive Church, though not ratified formally in Council. But it surely is otherwise with the Catholic doctrine of the Trinity. I do not see in what sense it can be said that there is a consensus of primi- tive divines in its favour, which will not avail also for certain doctrines of the Roman Church which will presently come into mention. And this is a point which the writer of the above passages ought to have more distinctly brought before his mind and more carefully weighed ; but he seems to have fancied that Bishop Bull proved the primitiveness of the Catholic doctrine concerning the Holy Trinity as well as that concerning our Lord. Now it should be clearly understood what it is which must be shown by those who would prove it. Of course the doctrine of our Lord's divinity itself partly implies and partly recommends the doctrine of the Trinity ; but impli- cation and suggestion belong to another class of arguments which has not yet come into consideration. Moreover the statements of a particular father or doctor may certainly be of a most important character ; but one divine is not equal to a Catena. We must have a whole doctrine stated by a whole Church. The Catholic Truth in question is made up of a number of separate propositions, each of which, if maintained to the exclusion of the rest, is a heresy. In order then to prove that all the Ante-nicene writers taught the dogma of the Holy Trinity, it is not enough to prove that each still has gone far enough to be only a ' INTRODUCTION. 15 heretic not enough to prove that one has held that the Son is God, (for so did the Sabellian, so did the Macedo- nian), and another that the Father is not the Son, (for so did the Arian), and another that the Son is equal to the Father, (for so did the Tritheist), and another that there is but One God, (for so did the Unitarian), not enough that many attached in some sense a Threefold Power to the idea of tho Almighty, (for so did almost all the heresies that ever existed, and could not but do so, if they accepted the New Testament at all) ; but we must show that all these statements at once, and others too, are laid down by as many separate testimonies as may fairly be taken to constitute a " consensus of doctors." It is true indeed that the subsequent profession of the doctrine in the Universal Church creates a presumption that it was held even before it was professed; and it is fair to interpret the early Fathers by the later. This is true, and admits of applica- tion to certain other doctrines besides that of the Blessed Trinity in Unity ; but there is as little room for such antecedent probabilities as for the argument from sugges- tions and intimations in the precise and imperative Quod semper, quod nbique, quod ab omnibus, as it is commonly understood by English divines, and is by them used against the later Church and the see of Rome. What we have a right to ask, if we are bound to act upon Vincent's rule in regard to the Trinitarian dogma, is a sufficient number of Ante-nicene statements, each distinctly antici- pating the Athanasian Creed. 11. Now let ns look at the leading facts of the case, in appealing to which I must not be supposed to be ascribing any heresy to the holy men whose words have not always been sufficiently full or exact to preclude the imputation. First, the Creeds of that early day make no mention in 16 INTRODUCTION. their letter of the Catholic doctrine at all. They make mention indeed of a Three; but that there is any mystery in the doctrine, that the Three are One, that They are coequal, coeternal, all increate, all omnipotent, all incomprehensible, is not stated, and never could be gathered from them. Of course we believe that they imply it, or rather intend it. God forbid \ve should do otherwise! But nothing in the mere letter of those documents leads to that belief. To give a deeper meaning to their letter, we must interpret them by the times which came after. Again, there is one and one only great doctrinal Council in Ante-nicene times. It was held at Antioch, in the middle of the third century, on occasion of the incipient innovations of the Syrian heretical school. Now the Fathers there assembled, for whatever reason, condemned, or at least withdrew, when it came into the dispute, the word "Homoiision," which was afterwards received at Nicaea as the special symbol of Catholicism against Arius.* Again, the six great Bishops and Saints of the Ante- nicene Church were St. Irenojus, St. Hippolytus, St. Cyprian, St. Gregory Thaumaturgus, St. Dionysius of Alexandria, and St. Methodius. Of these, St. Dionysius is accused by St. Basil of having sown the first seeds of Arianism; ' and St. Gregory is allowed by the same learned Father to have used language concerning our Lord, which he only defends on the plea of an economical object in the writer. 7 St. Hippolytus speaks as if he were ignorant of 6 Tliis of course has been disputed, as is the case with almost all facts which bear upon the decision of controversies. I shall not think it necessary to notice the possibility or the fact of objections on questions upon which the world may now be said to be agreed ; e. g. the arianizing tone cf Euscbius. 8 'A.v6* tyca, OVTOS fffrlv, oaa ff ^t*s fo/uej', 6 irpuros avBpuirois rk ffTttp^ara - Ep. ix. 2. ^ Bull, Dcfens. F. N. 6. INTRODUCTION. 17 our Lord's Eternal Sonship; 8 St. Methodiiw speaks incorrectly at least upon the Incarnation ; 9 and St. Cyprian does not treat of theology at all. Such is the incomplete- ness of the extant teaching of these true saints, and, in their day, faithful witnesses of the Eternal Son. Again, Athenagoras, St. Clement, Tertullian, and the two SS. Dionysii would appear to be the only writers whose language is at any time exact and systematic enough to remind us of the Athanasian Creed. If we limit our view of the teaching of the Fathers by what they expressly state, St. Ignatius may be considered as a Patri- passian, St. Justin arianizes, and St. Hippolytus is a Photiuian. Again, there are three great theological authors of the Ante-nicene centuries, Tertullian, Origen, and, we may add, Eusebius, though ho lived some way into the fourth. Tertullian is heterodox on the doctrine of our Lord's divinity, 1 and, indeed, ultimately fell altogether into heresy or schism ; Origen is, at the very least, suspected, and must be defended and explained rather than cited as a witness of orthodoxy ; and Eusebius was a Semi- Arian. 12. Moreover, it may be questioned whether any Ante- 8 " The authors who make the generation temporary, and speak not ex- pressly of any other, are these following : Justin, Athenagoras, Theophilus, Tatinu, Tertullian, and Hippolytus." Waterland, vol. 5. part 2, p. 104. 9 "Lcvia suut," says Mnran in his defence, "quae in Snnctissimnm Trini- tatcm hie liber peccare dicitur, paulo graviora quoa in mysterii'in Incarna- tiouis." Div. Jes. Christ, p. 527. Shortly after, p. 530, ' In tertia onitioiie nounullu K'gimus Incarnationem Domini spectantia, qua) subahsurd5 dicta fateor, uego impid cogitata." 1 Bishop Bull, who is tender towards him, allows, " Ut quod res est dicam, cum Vidontinianis hie et reliquo guosticorum grege aliquatenus locutus est Tert'illiauus; in re ipsa tamen cum Catholicis omniud sensit." Defeat. F. N. iii. 10, 15. C 18 INTRODUCTION. nicene father distinctly affirms either the numerical Unity or the Coequality of the Three Persons ; except perhaps the heterodox Tertullian, and that chiefly in a work written after he had become a Montanist : J yet to satisfy the Anti- roman use of Quod semper, Sfc., surely we ought not to be left for these great articles of doctrine to the testimony of a later age. Further, Bishop Bull allows that " nearly all the ancient Catholics who preceded Arius have the appearance of being ignorant of the invisible and incom prehensible (immensam) nature of the Son of God ; "* an article expressly taught in the Athanasian Creed under the sanction of its anathema. It must be asked, moreover, how much direct and literal testimony the Ante-nicene Fathers give, one by one, to the divinity of the Holy Spirit ? This alone shall be observed, that St Basil, in the fourth century, finding that, if he distinctly called the Third Person in the Blessed Trinity by the Name of God, he should be put out of the Church by the Arians, pointedly refrained from doing so on an occasion on which his enemies were on the watch ; and that, when some Catholics found fault with him, St. Athanasius took his part. 4 Could this possibly have been the conduct of any true Christian, not to say Saint, of a later age ? that is, whatever be the true account, of it, does it not suggest to us that the testimony of those early -times lies very unfavourably for the application of the rifle of Vincentius ? 13. Let it not be for a moment supposed that I impugn the orthodoxy of the early divines, or the cogency of theii testimony among fair inquirers ; but I am trying thembj Adv. Praxeam. 8 Defens. P. N. iv. 3, 1. 4 Basil, ed. Ben. vol. 2. p. xcvL INTRODUCTION. 19 that unfair interpretation of Vincentius, which, is necessary in order to make him available against the Church of Rome. And now, as to the positive evidence which those Fathers offer in behalf of the Catholic doctrine of the Trinity, it has been drawn out by Dr. Burton and seems to full under two heads. One is the general ascription of glory to the Three Persons together, both by fathers and churches, and that on continuous tradition and from the earliest times. Under the second fall certain distinct statements of particular fathers ; thus we find the word "Trinity" used by St. Theophilus, St. Clement, St. Hippolytus, Tertullian, St. Cyprian, Origen, St. Methodius ; and the Divine Circumincessio, the most distinctive portion of the Catholic doctrine, and the unity of power, or again, of substance, are declared with more or less distinctness by Athenagoras, St. Irenosus, St. Clement, Tertullian, St. Hippolytus, Origen, and the two SS. Dionysii. This is pretty much the whole of the evidence. 14. Perhaps it will be said we ought to take the Ante-nicene Fathers as a whole, and interpret one of them by another. This is to assume that they are all of one school, which of course they are, but which in controversy is a point to be proved; but it is even doubtful whether, on the whole, such a procedure would strengthen the argument. For instance, as to the second head of the positive evidence noted by Dr. Burton, Tertullian is the most formal and elaborate of these Fathers in his statements of the Catholic doctrine. " It would hardly I" possible," says Dr. Burton, after quoting a passage, " for Athanasius himself, or the compiler of the Athanasian Creed, to have delivered the doctrine of the Trinity in stronger terms than these." 6 Yet Tertullian must be considered heterodox on the 1 Ante-nicene Test, to the Trinity, p. 69. o 2 20 INTRODUCTION. doctrine of our Lord's eternal generation. 6 If then we are to argue from his instance to that of the other Fathers, D we shall be driven to the conclusion that even the most exact statements are worth nothing more than their letter, are a warrant for nothing beyond themselves, and are consistent with heterodoxy where they do not expressly protest against it. And again, as to the argument derivable from the Doxologies, it must not be forgotten that one of the passages in St. Justin Martyr includes the worship of the Angels. " We worship and adore," he says, " Him, and the Son who came from Him and taught us these things, and the host of those other good Angels, who follow and are like Him, and the Prophetic Spirit." ' A Unitarian might argue from this passage that the glory and worship which the early Church ascribed to our Lord was not more definite than that which St. Justin was ready to concede to creatures 15. Thus much on the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. Let us proceed to another example. There are two doctrines which are generally associated with the name of a Father of the fourth and fifth centuries, and which can show little definite, or at least but partial, testimony in their behalf before his time, Purgatory and Original Sin. The dictum of Vincent admits both or excludes both, according as it is or is not rigidly taken ; but, if used by Aristotle's " Lesbian Uule/' then, as Anglicans would wish, it can be made to admit Original Sin and exclude Purgatory. . "Qnia ct Pater Deus est, etjudcx Deus cst, non tamcn idco Pater et judex semper, quia Dcus semper. Nam nee Pater potuit csse ante Filiuui, uec judcx ante delictum. Fuit autem tempus, cum et dclictum et Filius non fuit, quod judicein, ct qui Patrem Dominum faceret." Contr. Herm. 3. 1 Vid. infra, towards the end of the Essay, ch. x., where more will be said on the passage. INTRODUCTION. 21 On the one hand, some notion of suffering, or disadvan- tage, or punishment after this life, in the case of the faithful departed, or other vague forms of the doctrine of Purgatory, has in its favour almost a consensus of the four first ages oi the Church, though some Fathers state it with far greater openness and decision than others. It is, as far as words go, the confession of St. Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, St. Perpetua, St. Cyprian, Origen, Lactantius, St. Hilary. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, St. Ambrose, St. Basil, St. Gregory of Nazianzus, and of Nyssa, St. Chrysostom, St. Jerome, St. Paulinus, and St. Augustine. And so, on the other hand, there is a certain agreement of Fathers from the first that mankind has derived some disadvantage from the sin of Adam. 16. Next, when we consider the two doctrines more dis- tinctly, the doctrine that between death and judgment there is a time or state of punishment ; and the doctrine that all men, naturally propagated from fallen Adam, are in consequence born destitute of original righteousness, we find, on the one hand, several, such as Tertulliun, St. Perpetua, St. Cyril, St. Hilary, St. Jerome, St. Gregory Nyssen, as far as their words go, definitely declaring a doctrine of Purgatory : whereas no one will say that there isa testimony of the Fathers, equallystrong, for thedoctrine of Original Sin, though it is difficult here to make any definite statement about their teaching without going into a discussion of the subject. On the subject of Purgatory there were, to speak generally, two schools of opinion ; the Greek, which con- templated a trial of fire at the last day through which all were to pass ; and the African, resembling more nearly the present doctrine of the Homan Church. And so there were two principal views of Original Sin, the Greek and 22 INTRODUCTION. the African or Latin. Of the Greek, the judgment of Hooker is well known, though it must not be taken in the letter : " The heresy of freewill was a millstone about those Pelagians' neck ; shall we therefore give sentence of death inevitable against all those Fathers in the Greek Church which, being mispcrsuadcd, died in the error of freewill ?"' Bishop Taylor, arguing for an opposite doctrine, bears a like testimony : " Original Sin," he says, " as it is at this day commouly explicated, was not the doctrine of the primitive Church ; but when Pelagius had puddled the stream, St. Austin was so angry that he stamped and disturbed it more. And truly . . I do not think that the gentlemen that urged against me St. Austin's opinion do well consider that I profess myself to follow those Fathers who were before him ; and whom St. Austin did forsake, as I do him, in the question/' ' The same is asserted or allowed by Jansenius, Pctavius, and Walch, 1 men of such different schools that we may surely take their agreement as a proof of the fact. A late writer, after going through the testimonies of the Fathers one by one, comes to the conclusion, first, that "the Greek Church in no point favoured Augustine, except in teaching that from Adam's sin came death, and, (after the time of Methodius,) an extraordinary and unnatural sensuality also;" next, that " the Latin Church affirmed, in addition, that a corrupt and contaminated soul, and that, by generation, was carried on to his posterity;" 8 and, lastly, that neither Of Justification, 26. Works, vel. ix. p. 396. 1 " Qiiiimvis igitur quarn mnxinio fallantur Pehigiatii, quum asscrant, peccatum originate ex Augustini profluxisse ingcnio, antiqunm voro ecclcsisun illud plane ncscivisse ; diffitcri tauien nemo potcst, apud Grsccos patrcs imprimis invcuiri loca, quse Pelagiauismo favere vidcntur. Hinc ct C. Jan- ocnius, ' Grace!,' inqnit, ' nisi cautc leganturet intelligantur, prasbcre possunt occasioncm errori IVlagiano;' et D. Petavius dicit, ' Gracci originalis fere criininis raram,noc disertam, mcntionem scriptis suis attigerunt.'" JPa/cA, tUiscell. Sacr. p. 607. * iloru, Comment, dt- P..CC. Orig. 1801, p. 96. INTRODUCTION. 23 Greeks nor Latins held the doctrine of imputation. It may be observed, in addition, that, in spite of the forcible teaching of St. Paul on the subject, the doctrine of Original Sin appears neither in the Apostles' nor the Nicene Creed. 17. One additional specimen shall be given as a sample of many others : I betake myself to one of our altars to receive the Blessed Eucharist ; I have no doubt whatever on my mind about the Gift which that Sacrament contains ; I confess to myself my belief, and I go through the steps on which it is assured to me. "The Presence of Christ is here, for It follows upon Consecration ; and Consecration ;s the prerogative of Priests; and Priests are made by Ordination ; and Ordination comes in direct line from the Apostles. Whatever be our other misfortunes, every link in our chain is safe ; we have the Apostolic Succession, we have a right form of consecration : therefore we are blessed with the great Gift.'' Here the question rises in me, " Who told you about that Grift ? " I answer, " I have learned it from the Fathers : I believe the Real Presence because they bear witness to it. St. Ignatius calls it ( the medicine of immortality : ' St. Irenncus says that ' our flesh becomes incorrupt, and partakes of life, and has the hope of the resurrection/ as ' being nourished from the Lord's Body and Blood ;' that the Eucharist ' is made up of two things, an earthly and an heavenly : ' 3 perhaps Origen, and perhaps Magnes, after him, say that It is not a type of our Lord's Bodjr, but His Body : and St. Cyprian uses language as fearful as can be spoken, of those who profane it. I cast my lot with them, I believe as they." Thus I reply, and then the thought comes upon me a second time, " And do not the same ancient Fathers bear witness to another User. iv. 18, 5. 24 INTRODUCTION. doctrine, which you disown P Are you not as a hypocrite, listening to them when you will, and deaf when you will not ? How are you casting your lot with the Saints, when you go but half-way with them ? For of whether of the two do they speak the more frequently, of the Real Presence in the Eucharist, or of the Pope's supremacy ? You accept the lesser evidence, you reject the greater." 18. In truth, scanty as the Ante-nicene notices may be of the Papal Supremacy, they are both more numerous and more definite than the adducible testimonies in favour of the Real Presence. The testimonies to the latter are confined to a few passages such as those just quoted. On the other hand, of a passage in St. Justin, Bishop Kaye remarks, "Le Nourry infers that Justin maintained the doctrine of Transubstantiation ; it might in my opinion bo more plausibly urged in favour of Consubstantiation, since Justin calls the consecrated elements Bread and Wine, though not common bread and wine. 4 . . . We may there- fore conclude that, when he calls them the Body and Blood of Christ, he speaks figuratively." " Clement," observes the same author, "says that the Scripture calls wine a mystic si/m&ol of the holy blood. . . . Clement gives various interpretations of Christ's expressions in John vi. respect- ing His flesh and blood; but in no instance does he interpret them literally His notion seems to have been that, by partaking of the bread and wine in the Eucharist, the soul of the believer is united to the Spirit, and that by this union the principle of immortality is im- parted to the flesh." s " It has been suggested by some," says Waterland, " that Tertullian understood John vi. merely of faith, or doctrine, or spiritual actions ; and it is strenuously denied by others." After quoting the passage, * Justin Martyr, ch. 4. 6 Clem. Alex. ch. 11. INTRODDCTION. 25 he adds, " All that one can justly gather from this confused passage is that Tertullian interpreted the bread of life in John vi. of the Word, which he sometimes makes to bo vocal, and sometimes substantial, blending the ideas in a very perplexed manner ; so that he is no clear authority for construing John vi. of doctrines, &c. All that is cer- tain is that he supposes the Word made flesh, the Word incarnate to be the heavenly bread spoken of in that chap- ter. 5 " " Origen's general observation relating to that chapter is, that it must not be literally, but figuratively understood." 7 Again, " It is plain enough that Eusebius followed Origen in this matter, and that both of them favoured the same mystical or allegorical construction; whether constantly and uniformly I need not say." 8 I will but add the incidental testimony afforded on a late occa- sion : how far the Anglican doctrine of the Eucharist depends on the times before the Nicene Council, how far on the times after it, may be gathered from the circum- stance that, when a memorable Sermon 9 was published on the subject, out of about one hundred and forty passages from the Fathers appended in the notes, not in formal proof, but in general illustration, only fifteen were taken from Ante-nicene writers. With such evidence, the Antc-nicene testimonies which may be cited in behalf of the authority of the Holy See, need not fear a comparison. Faint they may be one by one, but at least we may count seventeen of them, and they are various, and are drawn from many times and countries, and thereby serve to illustrate each other, and form a body of proof. Whatever objections may be made to this or that particular fact, and I do not think any valid ones can be raised, still, on the whole, I consider that a cumulative argument rises from them in favour of the ecumenical and Works, vol. vii. p. 118120. 7 Ibid. p. 121. 8 Jbi4. p. 127. [Pr. Pnsey'a University Sermon of 1843.] 26 INTBODUCTION. the doctrinal authority of Rome, stronger than any argument which can be drawn from the same period for the doctrine of the Real Presence. I shall have occasion to enumerate them in the fourth chapter of this Essay. 19. If it be said that the Real Presence appears, by the Liturgies of the fourth or fifth century, to have been the doctrine of the earlier, since those very forms probably existed from the first in Divine worship, this is doubtless an important truth ; but then it is true also that the writers of the fourth and fifth centuries fearlessly assert, or frankly allow that the prerogatives of Rome were derived from apostolic times, and that because it was the See of St. Peter. Moreover, if the resistance of St. Cyprian and Firmilian to the Church of Rome, in the question of baptism by heretics, be urged as an argument against her primitive authority, or the earlier resistance of Polycrates of Ephesus, let it be considered, first, whether all authority does not necessarily lead to resistance ; next, whether St. Cyprian's own doctrine, which is in favour of Rome, is not more weighty than his act, which is against her; thirdly, whether he was not already in error in the main question under discussion, and Firmilian also ; and lastly, which is the chief point here, whether, in like manner, we may not object on the other hand against the Real Presence the words of Tertullian, who explains, "This is my Body," by " a figure of my Body/' and of Origen, who speaks of " our drinking Christ's Blood not only in the rite of the Sacraments, but also when we receive His discourses/' 1 and says that "that Bread which God the Word acknowledges as His Body is the Word which nourishes souls," 2 passages which admit of a Catholic interpretation when the Catholic doctrine is 1 Numer. Horn. xvi. 9r 3 Interp. Com. in Matt. 80- INTRODUCTION. 27 once proved, but which primd facie run counter to that doctrine. It does not seem possible, then, to avoid the conclusion that, whatever be the proper key for harmonizing the records and documents of the early and later Church, and true as the dictum of Yincentius must be considered in the abstract, and possible as its application might be in his own age, when he might almost ask the primitive centuries for their testimony, it is hardly available now, or effective of any satisfactory result. The solution it offers is as difficult as the original problem. 20. Another hypothesis for accounting for a want of accord between the early and the late aspects of Christianity is that of the Disciplina Arcani, put forward on the assump- tion that there has been no variation in the teaching of the Church from first to last. It is maintained that doctrines which are associated with the later ages of the Church were really in the Church from the first, but not publicly taught, and that for various reasons : as, for the sake of reverence, that sacred subjects might not be pro- faned by the heathen ; and for the sake of catechumens, that they might not be oppressed or carried away by a sudden communication of the whole circle of revealed truth. And indeed the fact of this concealment can hardly be denied, in whatever degree it took the shape of a defi- nite rule, which might vary with persons and places. That it existed even as a rule, as regards the Sacraments, seems to be confessed on all hands. That it existed in other respects, as a practice, is plain from the nature of the case, and from the writings of the Apologists. Minucius Felix and Arnobius, in controversy with Pagans, imply a denial that then the Christians used altars ; yet Tertullian speaks expressly of the Ara Dei in the Church. What 28 INTRODUCTION. can we say, but that the Apologists deny altars in the sense in which they ridicule them ; or, that they deny that altars stick as the Pagan altars were tolerated by Christians ? And, in like manner, Minucius allows that there were no temples among Christians ; yet they are distinctly recognized in the edicts of the Dioclesian era, and are known to have existed at a still earlier date. It is the tendency of every dominant system, such as the Paganism of the Ante-nicene centuries, to force its oppo- nents into the most hostile and jealous attitude, from the apprehension which they natural!}' feel, lest if they acted otherwise, in those points in which they approximate to- wards it, they should be misinterpreted and overborne by its authority. The very fault now found with clergymen of the Anglican Church, who wish to conform their prac- tices to her rubrics, and their doctrines to her divines of the seventeenth century, is, that, whether they mean it or no, whether legitimately or no, still, in matter of fact, they will be sanctioning and encouraging the religion of Rome, in which there are similar doctrines and practices, more definite and more influential ; so that, at any rate, it is inexpedient at the moment to attempt what is sure to be mistaken. That is, they are required to exercise a disci- plina arcani; and a similar reserve was inevitable on the part of the Catholic Church, at a time when priests and altars and rites all around it were devoted to malignant and incurable superstitions. It would be wrong indeed to deny, but it was a duty to withhold, the ceremonial of Christianity ; and Apologists might be sometimes tempted to deny absolutely what at furthest could only be denied under conditions. An idolatrous Paganism tended to re- press the externals of Christianity, as, at this day, the presence of Protestantism is said to repress, though for another reason, the exhibition of the Roman Catholic religion. INTRODUCTION. 29 On various grounds, then, it is certain that portions of the Church system were held back in primitive times, and of course this fact goes some way to account for that apparent variation and growth of doctrine, which embar- rasses us when we would consult history for the true idea of Christianity ; yet it is no key to the whole difficulty, as we find it, for obvious reasons : because the varia- tions continue beyond the time when it is conceivable that the discipline was in force, and because they manifest themselves on a law, not abruptly, but by a visible growth which has persevered up to this time without any sign of its coming to an end. 3 21. The following Essay is directed towards a solution of the difficulty which has been stated, the difficulty, as far as it exists, which lies in the way of our using in controversy the testimony of our most natural informant concerning the doctrine and worship of Christianity, viz. the history of eighteen hundred years. The view on which it is written has at all times, perhaps, been implicitly adopted by theo- logians, and, I believe, has recently been illustrated by several distinguished writers of the continent, such as De Maistre and Mohler : viz. that the increase and expansion of the Christian Creed and Ritual, and the variations which have attended the process in the case of individual writers and Churches, are the necessary attendants on any philosophy or polity which takes possession of the intellect and heart, and has had any wide or extended dominion ; that, from the nature of the human mind, time is necessary for the full comprehension and perfection of great ideas ; and that the highest and most wonderful truths, though s \_Vid. Apolog., p. 198, aiid Difficulties of AugL vol. i. xii. 7.] 30 INTRODUCTION. communicated to the world once for all by inspired teachers, could not be comprehended all at once by the recipients, but, as being received and transmitted by minds not inspired and through media which were human, have required only the longer time and deeper thought for their full elucidation. This may be called the Theory of Development of Doctrine ; and, before proceeding to treat of it, one remark may be in place. It is undoubtedly an hypothesis to account for a diffi- culty ; but such too are the various explanations given by astronomers from Ptolemy to Newton of the apparent motions of the heavenly bodies, and it is as unphilosophical on that account to object to the one as to object to the other. Nor is it more reasonable to express surprise, that at this time of day a theory is necessary, granting for argument's sake that the theory is novel, than to have directed a similar wonder in disparagement of the theory af gravitation, or the Plutonian theory in geology. Doubt- less, the theory of the Secret and the theory of doctrinal Developments are expedients, and so is the dictum of Vin- centius ; so is the art of grammar or the use of the quad- rant ; it is an expedient to enable us to solve what has now become a necessary and an anxious problem. For three hundred years the documents and the facts of Chris- tianity have been exposed to a jealous scrutiny ; works have been judged spurious which once were received with- out a question ; facts have been discarded or modified which were once first principles in argument ; new facts and new principles have been brought to light ; philo- sophical views and polemical discussions of various tendencies have been maintained with more or less success. Not only has the relative situation of controversies and theologies altered, but infidelity itself is in a different, I am obliged to say in a more hopeful position, as regards Christianity. The facts of Revealed Religion, though in INTRODUCTION. 31 their substance unaltered, present a less compact and orderly front to the attacks of its enemies now than formerly, and allow of the introduction of new inquiries and theories concerning its sources and its rise. The state of things is not as it was, when an appeal lay to the sup- posed works of the Areopagite, or to the primitive Decre- tals, or to St. Dionysius's answers to Paul, or to the Coena Domini of St. Cyprian. The assailants of dogmatic truth have got the start of its adherents of whatever Creed ; philosophy is completing what criticism has begun ; and apprehensions are not unreasonably excited lest we should have a new world to conquer before we have weapons for the warfare. Already infidelity has its views and con- jectures, on which it arranges the facts of ecclesiastical history ; and it is sure to consider the absence of any antagonist theory as an evidence of the reality of its own. That the hypothesis, here to be adopted, accounts not only for the Athanasian Creed, but for the Creed of Pope Pius, is no fault of those who adopt it. No one has power over the issues of his principles ; we cannot manage our argu- ment, and have as much of it as we please and no more. An argument is needed, unless Christianity is to abandon the province of argument ; and those who find fault with the explanation here offered of its historical phenomena will find it their duty to provide one for themselves. And as no special aim at Roman Catholic doctrine need be supposed to have given a direction to the inquiry, so neither can a reception of that doctrine be immediately based on its results. It would be the work of a life to apply the Theory of Developments so carefully to the, writings of the Fathers, and to the history of controversies and councils, as thereby to vindicate the reasonableness of every decision of Rome ; much less can such an undertaking be imagined by one who, in the middle of his days, is .beginning life again. Thus much, however, might be 32 INTRODUCTION. gained even from an Essay like the present, an explana- tion of so many of the reputed corruptions, doctrinal and practical, of Borne, as might serve as a fair ground for trusting her in parallel cases where the investigation had not been pursued. CHAPTER I. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS. SECTION I. ON THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. IT is the characteristic of our minds to be ever engaged in passing judgment on the things which come before us. No sooner do we apprehend than we judge : we allow nothing to stand by itself : we compare, contrast, abstract, generalize, connect, adjust, classify : and we view all our knowledge in the associations with which these processes have invested it. Of the judgments thus made, which become aspects in our minds of the things which meet us, some are mere opinions which come and go, or which remain with us only till an accident displaces them, whatever be the influence which they exercise meanwhile. Others are firmly fixed in our minds, with or without good reason, and have a hold upon us, whether they relate to matters of fact, or to principles of conduct, or are views of life and the world, or are prejudices, imaginations, or convictions. Many of them attach to one and the same object, which is thus variously viewed, not only by various minds, but by the same. They sometimes lie in such near relation, that 34 ON THE PROCE8S OF [CH. I. each implies the others ; some are only not inconsistent with each other, in that they have a common origin : some, as being actually incompatible with each other, are, one or other, falsely associated in our minds with their object, and in any case they may be nothing more than ideas, which we mistake for things. Thus Judaism is an idea which once was objective, and Gnosticism is an idea which was never so. Both of them have various aspects : those of Judaism were such as mono- theism, a certain ethical discipline, a ministration of divine vengeance, a preparation for Christianity : those of the Gnostic idea are such as the doctrine of two principles^ that of emanation, the intrinsic malignity of matter, the inculpability of sensual indulgence, or the guilt of every pleasure of sense, of which last two one or other must be in the Gnostic a false aspect and subjective only. 2. The idea which represents an object or supposed object is commensurate with the sum total of its possible aspects, however they may vary in the separate consciousness of individuals ; and in proportion to the variety of aspects under which it presents itself to various minds is its force and depth, and the argument for its reality. Ordinarily an idea is not brought home to the intellect as objective except through this variety ; like bodily substances, which are not apprehended except under the clothing of their properties and results, and which admit of being walked round, and surveyed on opposite sides, and in different perspectives, and in contrary lights, in evidence of their reality. And, as views of a material object may be taken from points so remote or so opposed, that they seem at first sight incompatible, and especially as their shadows will be disproportionate, or even monstrous, and yet all these anomalies will disappear and all theso contrarieties SECT. I.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 35 be adjusted, on ascertaining the point of vision or the surface of projection in each case ; so also all the aspects of an idea are capable of coalition, and of a resolution into the object to which it belongs ; and the primd facie dis- similitude of its aspects becomes, when explained, an argu- ment for its substantiveness and integrity, and their multi- plicity for its originality and power. 3. There is no one aspect deep enough to exhaust the con- tents of a real idea, no one term or proposition which will serve to define it ; though of course one representation of it is more just and exact than another, and though when an idea is very complex, it is allowable, for the sake of con- venience, to consider its distinct aspects as if separate ideas. Thus, with all our intimate knowledge of animal life and of the structure of particular animals, we have not arrived at a true definition of any one of them, but are forced to enumerate properties and accidents by way of description. Nor can we inclose in a formula that intellectual fact, or system of thought, which we call the Platonic philosophy, or that historical phenomenon of doctrine and conduct, which we call the heresy of Montanus or of Manes. Again, if Protestantism were said to lie in its theory of private judgment, and Lutheranism in its doctrine of justification, this indeed would be an approximation to the truth ; but it is plain that to argue or to act as if the one or the other aspect were a sufficient account of those forms of religion severally, would be a serious mistake. Sometimes an attempt is made to determine the "leading idea," as it has been called, of Christianity, an ambitious essay as employed on a supernatural work, when, even as regards the visible creation and the inventions of man, such a task is beyond us. Thus its one idea has been said by some to be the restoration of our fallen race, by others philanthropy, by D2 36 ON THE PROCESS OF [CH. I. others the tidings of immortality, or the spirituality of true religious service, or the salvation of the elect, or mental liberty, or the union of the soul with God. If, indeed, it is only thereby meant to use one or other of these as a central idea for convenience, in order to group others around it, no fault can be found with such a proceed- ing : and in this sense I should myself call the Incarnation the central aspect of Christianity, out of which the three main aspects of its teaching take their rise, the sacramen- tal, the hierarchical, and the ascetic. But one aspect of Revelation must not be allowed to exclude or to obscure another ; and Christianity is dogmatical, devotional, practical all at once ; it is esoteric and exoteric ; it is indulgent and strict ; it is light and dark ; it is love, and it is fear. 4. When an idea, whether real or not, is of a nature to arrest and possess the mind, it may be said to have life, that is, to live in the mind which is its recipient. Thus mathematical ideas, real as they are, can hardly properly be called living, at least ordinarily. But, when some great enunciation, whether true or false, about human nature, or present good, or government, or duty, or religion, is carried forward into the public throng of men and draws attention, then it is not merely received passively in this or that form into many minds, but it becomes an active principle within them, leading them to an ever-new contemplation of itself, to an application of it in various directions, and a propagation of it on every side. Such is the doctrine of the divine right of kings, or of the rights of man, or of the anti-social bearings of a priesthood, or utilitarianism, or free trade, or the duty of benevolent enterprises, or the philosophy of Zeno or Epicurus, doctrines which are of a nature to attract and influence, and have so SECT. I.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 87 far a primd facie reality, that they may be looked at on many sides and strike various minds very variously. Let one such idea get possession of the popular mind, or the mind of any portion of the community, and it is not difficult to understand what will be the result. At first men will not fully realize what it is that moves them, and will express and explain themselves inadequately. There will be a general agitation of thought, and an action of mind upon mind. There will be a time of confusion, when conceptions and misconceptions are in conflict, and it is uncertain whether anything is to come of the idea at all, or which view of it is to get the start of the others. New lights will be brought to bear upon the original statements of the doc- trine put forward ; judgments and aspects will accumulate. After a while some definite teaching emerges ; and, as time proceeds, one view will be modified or expanded by another, and then combined with a third ; till the idea to which these various aspects belong, will be to each mind separately what at first it was only to all together. It will be sur- veyed too in its relation to other doctrines or facts, to other natural laws or established customs, to the varying circum- stances of times and places, to other religions, polities, philosophies, as the case may be. How it stands affected towards other systems, how it affects them, how far it may be made to combine with them, how far it tolerates them, when it interferes with them, will be gradually wrought out. It will be interrogated and criticized by enemies, and defended by well-wishers. The multitude of opinions formed concerning it in these respects and many others will be collected, compared, sorted, sifted, selected, rejected, gradually attached to it, separated from it, in the minds of individuals and of the community. It will, in propor- tion to its native vigour and subtlety, introduce itself into the framework and details of social life, changing public opinion, and strengthening or undermining the foundations 38 ON THE PROCESS OP [CH. I. of established order. Thus in time it will have grown into an ethical code, or into a system of government, or into a theology, or into a ritual, according to its capabili- ties : and this body of thought, thus laboriously gained, will after all be little more than the proper representative of one idea, being in substance what that idea meant from the first, its complete image as seen in a combination of diversified aspects, with the suggestions and corrections of many minds, and the illustration of many experiences. 5. This process, whether it be longer or shorter in point of time, by which the aspects of an idea are brought into consistency and form, I call its development, being the germination and maturation of some truth or apparent truth on a large mental field. On the other hand this pro- cess will not be a development, unless the assemblage of aspects, which constitute its ultimate shape, really belongs to the idea from which they start. A republic, for instance, is not a development from a pure monarchy, though it may follow upon it ; whereas the Greek " tyrant " may be considered as included in the idea of a democracy. More- over a development will have this characteristic, that, its action being in the busy scene of human life, it cannot progress at all without cutting across, and thereby des- troying or modifying and incorporating with itself existing modes of thinking and operating. The development then of an idea is not like an investigation worked out on paper, in which each successive advance is a pure evolution from a foregoing, but it is carried on through and by means of communities of men and their leaders and guides ; and it employs their minds as its instruments, and depends upon tbem, while it uses them. And so, as regards exist- ing opinions, principles, measures, and institutions of the community which it has invaded; it developes by esta- SECT. I.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 89 Wishing relations between itself and them ; it employs it- self, in giving them a new meaning and direction, in creating what may be called a jurisdiction over them, in throwing off whatever in them it cannot assimilate. It grows when it incorporates, and its identity is found, not in isolation, but in continuity and sovereignty. This it is that imparts to the history both of states and of religions, its specially turbulent and polemical character. Such is the explanation of the wranglings, whether of schools or of parliaments. It is the warfare of ideas under their various aspects striving for the mastery, each of them enterprising, engrossing, imperious, more or less incompatible with the rest, and rallying followers or rousing foes, according as it acts upon the faith, the prejudices, or the interest of parties or classes. 6. Moreover, an idea not only modifies, but is modified, or or at least influenced, by the state of things in which it is carried out, and is dependent in various ways on the cir- cumstances which surround it. Its development proceeds quickly or slowly, as it may be ; the order of succession in its separate stages is variable ; it shows differently in a small sphere of action and in an extended ; it may be interrupted, retarded, mutilated, distorted, by external violence ; it may be enfeebled by the effort of ridding itself of domestic foes ; it may be impeded and swayed or even absorbed by counter energetic ideas ; it may be coloured by the received tone of thought into which it comes, or depraved by the intrusion of foreign principles, or at length shattered by the development of some original fault within it. 7. But whatever be the risk of corruption from intercourse with the world around, such a risk must be encountered 40 ON THE PROCESS OP DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. [CH. 1 if a great idea is duly to be understood, and much more if it is to be fully exhibited. It is elicited and expanded by trial, and battles into perfection and supremacy. Nor does it escape the collision of opinion even in its earlier years, nor does it remain truer to itself, and with a better claim to be considered one and the same, though externally pro- tected from vicissitude and change. It is indeed some- times said that the stream is clearest near the spring. Whatever use may fairly be made of this image, it does not apply to the history of a philosophy or belief, which on the contrary is more equable, and purer, and stronger, when its bed has become deep, and broad, and full. It necessarily rises out of an existing state of things, and for a time savours of the soil. Its vital element needs disen- gaging from what is foreign and temporary, and is em- ployed in efforts after freedom which become more vigorous and hopeful as its years increase. Its beginnings are no measure of its capabilities, nor of its scope. At first no one knows what it is, or what it is worth. It remains per- haps for a time quiescent ; it tries, as it were, its limbs, and proves the ground under it, and feels its way. From time to time it makes essays which fail, and are in consequence abandoned. It seems in suspense which way to go ; it wavers, and at length strikes out in one definite direction. In time it enters upon strange territory ; points of con- troversy alter their bearing ; parties rise and fall around it ; dangers and hopes appear in new relations ; and old principles reappear under new forms. It changes with them in order to remain the same. In a higher world it is otherwise, but here below to live is to change, and to be perfect is to have changed often. SECT. II.] ON THE KINDS OP DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 41 SECTION II. ON THE KINDS OF DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. To attempt an accurate analysis or complete enumera- tion of the processes of thought, whether speculative or practical, which come under the notion of development, exceeds the pretensions of an Essay like the present ; but, without some general view of the various mental exercises which go by the name we shall have no security against con- fusion in our reasoning and necessary exposure to criticism. 1. First, then, it must be borne in mind that the word is commonly used, and is used here, in three senses indis- criminately, from defect of our language ; on the one hand for the process of development, on the other for the result ; and again either generally for a development, true or not true, (that is, faithful or unfaithful to the idea from which it started,) or exclusively for a development deserving the name. A false or unfaithful development is more properly to be called a corruption. 2. Next, it is plain that mathematical developments, that is, the system of truths drawn out from mathematical defi- nitions or equations, do not fall under our present subject, though altogether analogous to it. There can be no cor- ruption in such developments, because they are conducted on strict demonstration ; and the conclusions in which they terminate, being necessary, cannot be declensions from the original idea. 3. Nor, of course, do physical developments, as the growth of animal or vegetable nature, come into considera- tion here ; excepting that, together with mathematical, they may be taken as illustrations of the general subject to which we have to direct our attention. 4. Nor have we to consider material developments, which, though effected by human contrivance, are still 42 CN THE KINDS OF [CH. I. physical ; as the development, as it is called, of the national resources. We speak, for instance, of Ireland, the United States, or the valley of the Indus, as admitting of a great development j by which we mean, that those countries have fertile tracts, or abundant products, or broad and deep rivers, or central positions for commerce, or capacious and commodious harbours, the materials and instruments of wealth, and these at present turned to insufficient account. Development in this case will proceed by establishingmarts, cutting canals, laying down railroads, erecting factories, forming docks, and similar works, by which the natural riches of the country may be made to yield the largest return and to exert the greatest influence. In this sense, art is the development of nature, that is, its adaptation to the purposes of utility and beauty, the human intellect being the developing power. 2. 5. When society and its various classes and interests are the subject-matter of the ideas which are in operation, the development may be called political ; as we see it in the growth of States or the changes of a Constitution. Barbarians descend into southern regions from cupidity, and their warrant is the sword : this is no intellectual pro- cess, nor is it the mode of development exhibited in civilized communities. Where civilization exists, reason, in some shape or other, is the incentive or the pretence of development. When an empire enlarges, it is on the call of its allies, or for the balance of power, or from the necessity of a demonstration of strength, or from a fear for its frontiers. It lies uneasily in its territory, it is ill- shaped, it has unreal boundary-lines, deficient communica- tion between its principal points, or defenceless or turbu- lent neighbours, Thus, of old time, Eubcea was necessary for Athens, and Cythera for Sparta ; and Augustus left SECT, it.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 43 his advice, as a legacy, to confine the Empire between tho Atlantic, the Rhine and Danube, the Euphrates, and the Arabian and African deserts. In this day, we hear of the Rhine being the natural boundary of France, and the Indus of our Eastern empire ; and we predict that, in the event of a war, Prussia will change her outlines in the map of Europe. The development is material ; but an idea gives unity and force to its movement. And so to take a case of national politics, a late writer remarks of the Parliament of 1628-29, in its contest with Charles, that, so far from encroaching on the just powers of a limited monarch, it never hinted at the securities which were necessary for its measures. However, " twelve years more of repeated aggressions/' he adds, " taught the Long Parliament what a few sagacious men might perhaps have already suspected; that they must recover more of their ancient constitution, from oblivion ; that they must sustain its partial weakness by new securities ; that, in order to render the existence of monarchy com- patible with that of freedom, they must not only strip it of all it had usurped, but of something that was its own." ' Whatever be the worth of this author's theory, his facts or representations are an illustration of a political development. Again, at the present day, that Ireland should have a population of one creed, and a Church of another, is felt to be a political arrangement so unsatisfactory, that all parties seem to agree that either the population will de- velope in power or the Establishment in influence. Political developments, though really the growth of ideas, are often capricious and irregular from the nature of their subject-matter. They are influenced by the character of sovereigns, the rise and fall of statesmen, the fate of battles, and the numberless vicissitudes of the world. "Perhaps the Greeks would be still involved in 1 Hallam's Constit. Hist. ch. vii. p. 572- 44 ON THE KINDS OP [CH. I. the heresy of the Monophysites/' says Gibbon, " if the Emperor's horse had not fortunately stumbled. Theodosius expired, his orthodox sister succeeded to the throne." * 3 Again, it often happens, or generally, that various distinct and incompatible elements are found in the origin or infancy of politics, or indeed of philosophies, some of which must be ejected before any satisfactory de- velopments, if any, can take place. And they are com- monly ejected by the gradual growth of the stronger. The reign of Charles the First, just referred to, supplies an instance in point. Sometimes discordant ideas are for a time connected and concealed by a common profession or name. Such is the case of coalitions in politics and comprehensions in re- ligion, of which commonly no good is to be expected. Such is an ordinary function of committees and boards, and the sole aim of conciliations and concessions, to make contraries look the same, and to secure an outward agree- ment where there is no other unity. Again, developments, reactions, reforms, revolutions, and changes of various kinds are mixed together in the actual history of states, as of philosophical sects, so as to make it very difficult to exhibit them in any scientific analysis. Often the intellectual process is detached from the prac- tical, and posterior to it. Thus it was after Elizabeth had established the Eeformation that Hooker laid down his theory of Church and State as one and the same, differing only in idea; and, after the Revolution and its political consequences, that Warburton wrote his " Alliance." And now again a new theory is needed for the constitutional lawyer, in order to reconcile the existing political state of 2 ch. xlvii. 8ECT. II.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 45 things with the just claims of religion. And so, again, in Parliamentary conflicts, men first come to their conclusions by the external pressure of events or the force of prin- ciples, they do not know how ; then they have to speak, and they look about for arguments : and a pamphlet is published on the subject in debate, or an article appears in a Review, to furnish common-places for the many. Other developments, though political, are strictly sub- jected and consequent to the ideas of which they are the exhibitions. Thus Locke's philosophy was a real guide, not a mere defence of the Revolution era, operating forcibly upon Church and Government in and after his day. Such too were the theories which preceded the overthrow of the old regime in France and other countries at the end of the last century. Again, perhaps there are polities founded on no ideas at all, but on mere custom, as among the Asiatics. 4. 6. In other developments the intellectual character is so prominent that they may even be called logical, as in the Anglican doctrine of the Royal Supremacy, which has been created in the courts of law, not in the cabinet or on the field. Hence it is carried out with a consistency and minute application which the history of constitutions can- not exhibit. It does not only exist in statutes, or in articles, or in oaths, it is realized in details : as in the conge d'elire and letter-missive on appointment of a Bishop ; in the forms observed in Privy Council on the issuing of State Prayers ; in certain arrangements observed in the Prayer-book, where the universal or abstract Church precedes the King, but the national or really existing body follows him ; in printing his name in large capitals, while the Holiest Names are in ordinary type, and in fixing his arras in churches instead of the Crucifix : 46 ON THE KINDS OP [CH. I. moreover, perhaps, in placing " sedition, privy conspiracy and rebellion," before '' false doctrine, heresy, and schism " in the Litany. Again, when some new philosophy or its instalments are introduced into the measures of the Legislature, or into the concessions made to a political party, or into commer- cial or agricultural policy, it is often said, " "We have not seen the end of this ; " " It is an earnest of future con- cessions ; " " Our children will see/' We feel that it has unknown bearings and issues. The admission of Jews to municipal offices has lately been defended s on the ground that it is the introduction of no new principle, but a development of one already re- ceived ; that its great premisses have been decided long since ; and that the present age has but to draw the con- clusion ; that it is not open to us to inquire what ought to be done in the abstract, since there is no ideal model for the infallible guidance of nations ; that change is only a question of time, and that there is a time for all things ; that the application of principles ought not to go beyond the actual case, neither preceding nor coming after an imperative demand ; that in point of fact Jews have lately been chosen for offices, and that in point of principle the law cannot refuse to legitimate such elections. 5. 7. Another class of developments may be called his- torical; being the gradual formation of opinion concerning persons, facts, and events. Judgments, which were at one time confined to a few, at length spread through a community, and attain general reception by the accumu- lation and concurrence of testimony. Thus some authori- tative accounts die away ; others gain a footing, and are ultimately received as truths. Courts of law, Parliament- ' Times newspaper of March, 1845. SECT. II.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 47 ary proceedings, newspapers, letters and other posthumous documents, the industry of historians and biographers, and the lapse of years which dissipates parties and prejudices, are in this day the instruments of such development. Accordingly the Poet makes Truth the daughter of Time. 4 Thus at length approximations are made to a right appreciation of transactions and characters. History can- not be written except in an after-age. Thus by develop- ment the Canon of the New Testament has been formed. Thus public men are content to leave their reputation to posterity ; great reactions take place in opinion ; nay, sometimes men outlive opposition and obloquy. Thus Saints are canonized in the Church, long after they have entered into their rest. 6. 8. Ethical developments are not properly matter for argument and controversy, but are natural and personal, substituting what is congruous, desirable, pious, appro- priate, generous, for strictly logical inference. Bishop Butler supplies us with a remarkable instance in the beginning of the Second Part of his "Analogy." As principles imply applications, and general propositions in- clude particulars, so, he tells us, do certain relations imply correlative duties, and certain objects demand certain acts and feelings. He observes that, even though we were not enjoined to pay divine honours to the Second and Third Persons of the Holy Trinity, what is predicated of Them in Scripture would be an abundant warrant, an indirect command, nay, a ground in reason, for doing so. " Does not," he asks, " the duty of religious regards to both these Divine Persons as immediately arise, to the view of reason, out of the very nature of these offices and relations, as the inward good-will and kind intention which we owe to our 4 Crabbe's Tales. 48 ON THE KINDS 0? [CH. I. fellow-creatures arises out of the common relations between us and them ? " He proceeds to say that he is speaking of the inward religious regards of reverence, honour, love, trust, gratitude, fear, hope. " In what external manner this inward worship is to be expressed, is a matter of pure revealed command j . . but the worship, the internal worship itself, to the Son and Holy Ghost, is no further matter of pure revealed command than as the relations they stand in to us are matter of pure revelation ; for, the relations being known, the obligations to such internal worship are obligations of reason, arising out of those relations themselves." Here is a development of doctrine into worship, of which parallel instances are obviously to be found in the Church of Rome. 7. A development, converse to that which Butler speaks of, must next be mentioned. As certain objects excite certain emotions and sentiments, so do sentiments imply objects and duties. Thus conscience, the existence of which we cannot deny, is a proof of the doctrine of a Moral Governor, which alone gives it a meaning and a scope ; that is, the doctrine of a Judge and Judgment to come is a development of the phenomenon of conscience. Again, it is plain that passions and affections are in action in our minds before the presence of their proper objects ; and their activity would of course be an antece- dent argument of extreme cogency in behalf of the real existence of those legitimate objects, supposing them un- known. And so again, the social principle, which is innate in us, gives a divine sanction to society and to civil government. And the usage of prayers for the dead im- plies certain circumstances of their state upon which such devotions bear. And rites and ceremonies are natural means through which the mind relieves itself of devotional SECT. II.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 49 and penitential emotions. And sometimes the cultivation of awe and love towards what is great, high, and unseen, has led a man to the abandonment of his sect for some more Catholic form of doctrine. Aristotle furnishes us with an instance of this kind of development in his account of the happy man. After showing that his definition of happiness includes in itself the pleasurable, which is the most obvious and popular idea of happiness, he goes on to say that still external goods are necessary to it, about which, however, the defi- nition said nothing ; that is, a certain prosperity is by moral fitness, not by logical necessity, attached to the happy man. " For it is impossible," he observes, " or not easy, to practise high virtue without abundant means. Many deeds are done by the instrumentality of friends, wealth and political power ; and of some things the absence is a cloud upon happiness, as of noble birth, of hopeful children, and of personal appearance : for a person utterly deformed, or low-born, or bereaved and childless, cannot quite be happy : and still less if he have very worthless children or friends, or they were good and died." ' 8. This process of development has been well delineated by a living French writer, in his Lectures on European civi- lization, who shall be quoted at some length. "If we reduce religion," he says, " to a purely religious sentiment ... it appears evident that it must and ought to remain a purely personal concern. But I am either strangely mistaken, or this religious sentiment is not the complete expression of the religious nature of man. Religion is, I believe, very different from this, and much more extended. There are problems in human nature, in human destinies, which cannot be solved in this life, which depend on an 5 Eth. Nic. i. 8. 50 ON THE KINDS OF [CH. I. order of things unconnected with the visible world, but which unceasingly agitate the human mind with a desire to comprehend them. The solution of these problems is the origin of all religion ; her primary object is to discover the creeds and doctrines which contain, or are supposed to contain it. " Another cause also impels mankind to embrace religion . . . From whence do morals originate P whither do they lead P is this self-existing obligation to do good, an isolated fact, without an author, without an end ? does it not con- ceal, or rather does it not reveal to man, an origin, a destiny, beyond this world? The science of morals, by these spontaneous and inevitable questions, conducts man to the threshold of religion, and displays to him a sphere from whence he has not derived it. Thus the certain and never- failing sources of religion are, on the one hand, the pro- blems of our nature ; on the other, the necessity of seeking for morals a sanction, an origin, and an aim. It there- fore assumes many other forms beside that of a pure senti- ment ; it appears a union of doctrines, of precepts, of promises. This is what truly constitutes religion ; this is its fundamental character ; it is not merely a form of sensibility, an impulse of the imagination, a variety oi poetry. " When thus brought back to its true elements, to its essential nature, religion appears no longer a purely personal concern, but a powerful and fruitful principle of association. Is it considered in the light of a system of belief, a system of dogmas ? Truth is not the heritage of any individual, it is absolute and universal ; mankind ought to seek and profess it in common. Is it considered with reference to the precepts that are associated with its doctrines? A law which is obligatory on a single indi- vidual, is so on all ; it ought to be promulgated, and it is our duty to endeavour to bring all mankind under its SECT. II.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 61 dominion. It is the same with respect to the promises that religion makes, in the name of its creeds and precepts ; they ought to be diffused ; all men should be incited to partake of their benefits. A religious society, therefore, naturally results from the essential elements of religion, and is such a necessary consequence of it that the term which expresses the most energetic social sentiment, the most intense desire to propagate ideas and extend society, is the word proselytism, a term which is especially applied to religious belief, and in fact consecrated to it. " When a religious society has ever been formed, when a certain number of men are united by a common religious creed, are governed by the same religious precepts, and enjoy the same religious hopes, some form of government is necessary. No society can endure a week, nay more, no society can endure a single hour, without a government. The moment, indeed, a society is formed, by the very fact of its formation, it calls forth a government, a govern- ment which shall proclaim the common truth which is the bond of the society, and promulgate and maintain the precepts that this truth ought to produce. The necessity of a superior power, of a form of government, is involved in tke fact of the existence of a religious, as it is in that of any other society. " And not only is a government necessary, but it natu- rally forms itself. . . . When events are suffered to follow their natural laws, when force does not interfere, power falls into the hands of the most able, the most worthy, those who are most capable of carrying out the principles on which the society was founded. Is a warlike expedi- tion in agitation P The bravest take the command. Is the object of the association learned research, or a scientific undertaking P The best informed will be the leader. . . . The inequality of faculties and influence, which is the foundation of power in civil life, has the same effect in a i 52 ON THE KINDS OP [CH. I. religious society. . . Religion has no sooner arisen in the human mind than a religious society appears ; and im- mediately a religious society is formed, it produces its government." a 9. 9. It remains to allude to what, unless the word were often so vaguely and variously used, I should be led to call metaphysical developments ; I mean such as are a mere analysis of the idea contemplated, and terminate in its exact and complete delineation. Thus Aristotle draws the character of a magnanimous or of a munificent man ; thus Shakspeare might conceive and bring out his Hamlet or Ariel ; thus Walter Scott gradually enucleates his James, or Dalgetty, as the action of his story proceeds ; and thus, in the sacred province of theology, the mind may be em- ployed in developing the solemn ideas, which it has hitherto held implicitly and without subjecting them to its reflect- ing and reasoning powers. I have already treated of this subject at length, with a reference to the highest theological subject, in a former work, from which it will be sufficient here to quote some sentences in explanation : " The mind which is habituated to the thought of God, of Christ, of the Holy Spirit, naturally turns with a devout curiosity to the contemplation of the object of its adoration, and begins to form statements concerning it, before it knows whither, or how far, it will be carried. One proposition necessarily leads to another, and a second to a third ; then some limitation is required ; and the combination of these opposites occasions some fresh evolutions from the original idea, which indeed can never be said to be entirely ex- hausted. This process is its development, and results in a series, or rather body, of dogmatic statements, till what Quizot, Europ. Civil., Lect. v., Beckwith's Translation. SECT. II.] DEVELOPMENT IN IDEAS. 58 was an impression on the Imagination has become a system or creed in the Reason. " Now such impressions are obviously individual and complete above other theological ideas, because they are the impressions of Objects. Ideas and their developments are commonly not identical, the development being but the carrying out of the idea into its consequences. Thus the doctrine of Penance may be called a development of the doctrine of Baptism, yet still is a distinct doctrine ; whereas the developments in the doctrines of the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation are mere portions of the original impression, and modes of representing it. As God is one, so the impression which He gives us of Himself is one ; it is not a thing of parts ; it is not a system ; nor is it anything imperfect and needing a counterpart. It is the vision of an object. When we pray, we pray, not to an assemblage of notions or to a creed, but to One Indi- vidual Being ; and when we speak of Him, we speak of a Person, not of a Law or Manifestation . . . Religious men, according to their measure, have an idea or vision of the Blessed Trinity in Unity, of the Son Incarnate, and of His Presence, not as a number of qualities, attributes, and actions, not as the subject of a number of propositions, but as one and individual, and independent of words, like an impression conveyed through the senses .... Creeds and dogmas live in the one idea which they are designed to express, and which alone is substantive ; and are neces- sary, because the human mind cannot reflect upon that idea except piecemeal, cannot use it in its oneness and entireness, or without resolving it into a series of aspects and rela- tions." 7 10. So much on the development of ideas in various subject matters : it may be necessary to add that, in many cases, 1 [Univ. Serm. xv. 2023, pp. 829332, ed. 8.] 54 ON THE KINDS OP DEVELOPMENT, ETC. [CH. I. SECT. II. development simply stands for exhibition, as in some of the instances adduced above. Thus both Calvinism and Unitarianism may be called developments, that is, exhibi- tions, of the principle of Private Judgment, though they have nothing in common, viewed as doctrines. As to Christianity, supposing the truths of which it consists to admit of development, that development will be one or other of the last five kinds. Taking the Incarna- tion as its central doctrine, the Episcopate, as taught by St. Ignatius, will be an instance of political development, the Theotokos of logical, the determination of the date of our Lord's birth of historical the Holy Eucharist of moral, and the Athanasian Creed of metaphysical. CHAPTER II. ON THE ANTECEDENT ARGUMENT IN BEHALF OP DEVELOPMENTS IN CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. SECTION I. DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE TO BE EXPECTED. 1. IF Christianity is a fact, and impresses an idea of itself on our minds and is a subject-matter of exercises of the reason, that idea will in course of time expand into a multitude of ideas, and aspects of ideas, connected and harmonious with one another, and in themselves determinate and immutable, as is the objective fact itself which is thus represented. It is a characteristic of our minds, that they cannot take an object in, which is submitted to them simply and integrally. We conceive by means of defini- nition or description ; whole objects do not create in the intellect whole ideas, but are, to use a mathematical phrase, thrown into series, into a number of statements, strengthen- ing, interpreting, correcting each other, and with more or less exactness approximating, as they accumulate, to a perfect image. There is no other way of learning or of teaching. We cannot teach except by aspects or views, which are not identical with the thing itself which wenre teaching. Two persons may each convey the same truth to a third, yet by methods and through representations 56 DEVELOPMENTS OF DOCTRINE [CH. II. altogether different. The same person will treat the same argument differently in an essay or speech, according to the accident of the day of writing, or of the audience, yet it will be substantially the same. And the more claim an idea has to be considered living, the more various will be its aspects ; and the more social and political is its nature, the more complicated and subtle will be its issues, and the longer and more eventful will be its course. And in the number of these special ideas, which from their very depth and richness cannot be fully understood at once, but are more and more clearly expressed and taught the longer they last, having aspects many and bearings many, mutually connected and grow- ing one out of another, and all parts of a whole, with a sympathy and correspondence keeping pace with the ever-changing necessities of the world, multiform, prolific, and ever resourceful, among these great doctrines surely we Christians shall not refuse a foremost place to Chris- tianity. Such previously to the determination of the fact, must be our anticipation concerning it from a contempla- tion of its initial achievements. 2. It may be objected that its inspired documents at once determine the limits of its mission without further trouble ; but ideas are in the writer and reader of the revelation, not the inspired text itself : and the question is whether those ideas which the letter conveys from writer to reader, reach the reader at once in their completeness and accuracy on his first perception of them, or whether they open out in his intellect and grow to perfection in the course of time. Nor could it surely be maintained without extravagance that the letter of the New Testament, or of any assignable number of books, comprises a delineation of all possible SECT. I.] TO BE KXFKCTBD. 57 forms which a divine message will assume when submitted to a multitude of minds. Nor is the case altered by supposing that inspiration provided in behalf of the first recipients of the Revelation, what the Divine Fiat effected for herbs and plants in the beginning, which were created in maturity. Still, the time at length came, when its recipients ceased to be inspired ; and on these recipients the revealed truths would fall, as in other cases, at first vaguely and generally, though in spirit and in truth, and would afterwards be completed by developments. Nor can it fairly be made a difficulty that thus to treat of Christianity is to level it in some sort to sects and doctrines of the world, and to impute to it the imperfections which characterize the productions of man. Certainly it is a sort of degradation of a divine work to consider it under an earthly form ; but it is no irreverence, since our Lord Himself, its Author and Guardian, bore one also. Christianity differs from other religions and philosophies, in what is superadded to earth from heaven ; not in kind, but in origin ; not in its nature, but in its personal characteristics ; being informed and quickened by what is more than intellect, by a divine spirit. It is externally what the Apostle calls an " earthen vessel," being the religion of men. And, considered as such, it grows " in wisdom and stature ; " but the powers which it wields, and the words which proceed out of its mouth, attest its miraculous nativity. Unless then some special ground of exception can be assigned, it is as evident that Christianity, as a doctrine and worship, will develope in the minds of recipients, as that it conforms in other respects, in its external propaga- tion or its political framework, to the general methods by which the course of things is carried forward. 58 DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTKINB [CH. II. 3. 2. Again, if Christianity be an universal religion, suited not simply to one locality or period, but to all times and places, it cannot but vary in its relations and dealings towards the world around it, that is, it will develope. Principles require a very various application according as persons and circumstances vary, and must be thrown into new shapes according to the form of society which they are to influence. Hence all bodies of Christians, orthodox or not, develope the doctrines of Scripture. Few but will grant that Luther's view of justification had never been stated in words before his time: that his phraseology and his positions were novel, whether called for by circumstances or not. It is equally certain that the doctrine of justification defined at Trent was, in some sense, new also. The refutation and remedy of errors cannot precede their rise ; and thus the fact of false developments or corruptions involves the correspondent manifestation of true ones. Moreover, all parties appeal to Scripture, that is, argue from Scripture ; but argument implies deduction, that is, development. Here there is no difference between early times and late, between a Pope ex cathedra and an individual Protestant, except that their authority is not on a par. On either side the claim of authority is the same, and the process of development. Accordingly, the common complaint of Protestants against the Church of Rome is, not simply that she has added to the primitive or the Scriptural doctrine, (for this they do themselves,) but that she contradicts it, and moreover imposes her additions as fundamental truths under sanction of an anathema. For themselves they deduce by quite as subtle a method, and act upon doctrines as implicit and on reasons as little analyzed in time past, as Catholic schoolmen. What prominence has the Royal Supremacy in the SECT. I.] TO BE EXPECTED. 69 Testament, or the lawfulness of bearing arms, or the duty of public worship, or the substitution of the first day of the week for the seventh, or infant baptism, to say nothing of the fundamental principle that the Bible and the Bible only is the religion of Protestants? These doctrines and usages, true or not, which is not the question here, are surely *not gained by the direct use and immediate application of Scripture, nor by a mere exercise of argu- ment upon words and sentences placed before the eyes, but by the unconscious growth of ideas suggested by the letter and habitual to the mind. 4. 3. And, indeed, when we turn to the consideration of particular doctrines on which Scripture lays the greatest stress, we shall see that it is absolutely impossible for them to remain in the mere letter of Scripture, if they are to be more than mere words, and to convey a definite idea to the recipient. When it is declared that "the Word became flesh," three wide questions open upon us on the very announcement. What is meant by "the Word," what by " flesh," what by " became " P The answers to these involve a process of investigation, and are develop- ments. Moreover, when they have been made, they will suggest a series of secondary questions ; and thus at length a multitude of propositions is the result, which gather round the inspired sentence of which they come, giving it externally the form of a doctrine, and creating or deepen- ing the idea of it in the mind. It is true that, so far as such statements of Scripture are mysteries, they are relatively to us but words, and cannot be developed. But as a mystery implies in part what is incomprehensible or at least unknown, so does it in part imply what is not so ; it implies a partial mani- festation, or a representation by economy. Because then 60 DEVELOPMENTS OF DOCTRINE [CH. II. it is in a measure understood, it can so far be developed, though each result in the process will partake of the dimness and confusion of the original impression. 5. 4. This moreover should be considered, that great questions exist in the subject-matter of which Scripture treats, which Scripture does not solve; questions too so real, so practical, that they must be answered, and, unless we suppose a new revelation, answered by means of the revelation which we have, that is, by development. Such is the question of the Canon of Scripture and its inspira- tion : that is, whether Christianity depends upon a written document as Judaism ; if so, on what writings and how many ; whether that document is self- interpreting, or requires a comment, and whether any authoritative com- ment or commentator is provided ; whether the revelation and the document are commensurate, or the one outruns the other ; all these questions surely find no solution on the surface of Scripture, nor indeed under the surface in the case of most men, however long and diligent might be their study of it. Nor were these difficulties settled by authority, as far as we know, at the commencement of the religion; yet surely it is quite conceivable that an Apostle might have dissipated them all in a few words, had Divine Wisdom thought fit. But in matter of fuct the decision has been left to time, to the slow process of thought, to the influence of mind upon mind, the issues of controversy, and the growth of opinion. 6. To take another instance just now referred to : if there was a point on which a rule was desirable from the first, it was concerning the religious duties under which Chris- tian parents lay as regards their children. It would be SECT. I.] TO BE EXPECTED. 61 natural indeed in any Christian father, in the absence of a rule, to bring his children for baptism ; such in this instance would be the practical development of his faith in Christ and love for his offspring ; still a development it is, necessarily required, yet, as far as we know, not provided for his need by direct precept in the Revelation as originally given. Another very large field of thought, full of practical considerations, yet, as far as our knowledge goes, but only partially occupied by any Apostolical judgment, is thai, which the question of the effects of Baptism opens upon us. That they who came in repentance and faith to that Holy Sacrament received remission of sins, is undoubtedly the doctrine of the Apostles ; but is there any means of a second remission for sins committed after it ? St. Paul's Epistles, where we might expect an answer to our inquiry, contain no explicit statement on the subject ; what they do plainly say dees not diminish the difficulty: viz., first, that baptism is intended for the pardon of sins before it, not in prospect ; next, that those who have received the gift of Baptism in fact live in a state of holiness, not of sin. How do statements such as these meet the actual state of the Church as we see it at this day ? Considering that it was expressly predicted that the Kingdom of Heaven, like the fisher's net, should gather of every kind, and that the tares should grow with the wheat until the harvest, a graver and more practical question cannot be imagined than that which it has pleased the Divine Author of the Revelation to leave undecided, un- less indeed there be means given in that Revelation of its own growth or development. As far as the letter goes of the inspired message, every one who holds that Scripture is the rule of faith, as all Protestants do, must allow that "there is not one of us but has exceeded by transgression its revealed Ritual, and finds himself in consequence 62 DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE [CH. II. thrown upon those infinite resources of Divine Love which are stored in Christ, but have not been drawn out into form in the appointments of the Gospel." 1 Since then Scripture needs completion, the question is brought to this issue, whether defect or inchoateness in its doctrines be or be not an antecedent probability in favour of a development of them. 7. There is another subject, though not so immediately practical, on which Scripture does not, strictly speaking, keep silence, but says so little as to require, and so much as to suggest, information beyond its letter, the intermediate state between death and the Resurrec- tion. Considering the long interval which separates Christ's first and second coming, the millions of faithful souls who are waiting it out, and the intimate concern which every Christian has in the determination of its character, it might have been expected that Scripture would have spoken explicitly concerning it, whereas in fact its notices are but brief and obscure. We might in- deed have argued that this silence of Scripture was inten- tional, with a view of discouraging speculations upon the subject, except for the circumstance that, as in the question of our post-baptismal state, its teaching seems to proceed upon an hypothesis inapplicable to the state of the Church after the time when it was delivered. As Scripture contem- plates Christians, not as backsliders, but as saints, so does it apparently represent the Day of Judgment as imme- diate, and the interval of expectation as evanescent. It leaves on our minds the general impression that Christ was returning on earth at once, " the time short/' worldly engagements superseded by " the present distress," perse- cutors urgent, Christians, as a body, sinless and expectant, without home, without plan for the future, looking up to 1 Doctrine of Justification, Lect- xiii. SECT. I.] TO BE EXPECTED. 68 heaven. But outward circumstances have changed, and with the change, a different application of the revealed word has of necessity been demanded, that is, a development. When the nations were converted and offences abounded, then the Church came out to view, on the one hand as a temporal establishment, on the other as a remedial system, and passages of Scripture aided and directed the development which before were of inferior account. Hence the doctrine of Penance as the complement of Baptism, and of Purgatory as the explanation of the Intermediate State. So reasonable is this expansion of the original creed, that, when some ten years since the true doctrine of Baptism was expounded among us without any men- tion of Penance, our teacher was accused by many of ua of Novatianism ; while, on the other hand, heterodox divines have before now advocated the doctrine of the sleep of the soul because they said it was the only success- ful preventive of belief in Purgatory. 8. Thus developments of Christianity are proved to have been in the contemplation of its Divine Author, by an argument parallel to that by which we infer intelligence in the system of the physical world. In whatever sense the need and its supply are a proof of design in the visible creation, in the same do the gaps, if the word may be used, which occur in the structure of the original creed of the Church, make it probable that those developments, which grow out of the truths which lie around it, were intended to fill them up. Nor can it be fairly objected that in thus arguing we are contradicting the great philosopher, who tells us, that "upon supposition of God affording us light and instruction by revelation, additional to what He has afforded us by reason and experience, we are in no sort judges by what 64 DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE [CH. II. methods, and in what proportion, it were to be expected that this supernatural light and instruction would be afforded us,"* because he is speaking of our judging before a revela- tion is given. He observes that "we have no principles of reason upon which to judge beforehand, how it were to be expected Revelation should have been left, or what was most suitable to the divine plan of government/' in various respects ; but the case is altogether altered when a Reve- lation is vouchsafed, for then a new precedent, or what he calls " principle of reason," is introduced, and from what is actually put into our hands we can form a judgment whether more is to be expected. Butler, indeed, as a well-known passage of his work shows, is far from denying the principle of progressive development 9. 5. The method of revelation observed in Scripture abundantly confirms this anticipation. For instance, Prophecy, if it had so happened, need not have afforded a specimen of development ; separate predictions might have been made to accumulate as time went on, prospects might have opened, definite knowledge might have been given, by communications independent of each other, as St. John's Gospel or the Epistles of St. Paul are uncon- nected with the first three Gospels, though the doctrine of each Apostle is a development of their matter. But the prophetic Revelation is, in matter of fact, not of this nature, but a process of development : the earlier pro- phecies are pregnant texts out of which the succeeding announcements grow ; they are types. It is not that first one truth is told, then another ; but the whole truth or large portions of it are told at once, yet only in their rudi- ments, or in miniature, and they are expanded and finished in their parts, as the course of revelation proceeds. Butler's Anal. ii. 3. SECT. I.] TO BE EXPECTED. 65 The Seed of the woman was to bruise the serpent's head ; the sceptre was not to depart from Judah till Shiloh came, to whom was to be the gathering of the people. He was to be Wonderful, Counsellor, the Prince of Peace. The question of the Ethiopian rises in the reader's mind, " Of whom speuketh the Prophet this ? " Every word requires a comment. Accordingly, it is no uncommon theory with unbelievers, that the Messianic idea, as they call it, was gradually developed in the minds of the Jews by a con- tinuous and traditional habit of contemplating it, and grew into its full proportions by a mere human process ; and so far seems certain, without trenching on the doctrine of inspiration, that the books of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are developments of the writings of the Prophets, expressed or elicited by means of current ideas in the Greek philo- sophy, and ultimately adopted and ratified by the Apostle in his Epistle to the Hebrews. 10. But the whole Bible, not its prophetical portions only, is written on the principle of development. As the Reve- lation proceeds, it is ever new, yet ever old. St. John, who completes it, declares that he writes no " new com- mandment unto his brethren/' but an old commandment which they " had from the beginning." And then he adds, " A new commandment I write unto you." The same test of development is suggested in our Lord's words on the Mount, as has already been noticed, " Think not that I am come to destroy the Law and the Prophets ; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil" He does not reverse, but perfect, what has gone before. Thus with respect to the evangelical view of the rite of sacrifice, first the rite is enjoined by Moses ; next Samuel says, " to obey is better than sacrifice ;" then Hosea, " I will have mercy and not sacrifice ;" Isaiah, " Incense is an abomi- F 66 DEVELOPMENTS OF DOCTRINE [CH. II. nation unto me ;" then Malachi, describing the times of the Gospel, speaks of the " pure offering " of wheatflour ; and our Lord completes the development, when He speaks of worshipping " in spirit and in truth." If there is any- thing here left to explain, it will be found in the usage of the Christian Church immediately afterwards, which shows that sacrifice was not removed, but truth and spirit added. Nay, the effata of our Lord and His Apostles are of a typical structure, parallel to the prophetic announcements above mentioned, and predictions as well as injunctions of doctrine. If then the prophetic sentences have had that development which has really been given them, first by succeeding revelations, and then by the event, it is pro- bable antecedently that those doctrinal, political, ritual, and ethical sentences, which have the same structure, should admit the same expansion. Such are, "This is My Body," or " Thou art Peter, and upon this Rock I will build My Church," or " The meek shall inherit the earth," or " Suffer little children to come unto Me," or " The pure in heart shall see God." 11. On this character of our Lord's teaching, the following passage may suitably be quoted from a writer already used. " His recorded words and works when on earth . . . come to us as the declarations of a Lawgiver. In the Old Cove- nant, Almighty God first of all spoke the Ten Command- ments from Mount Sinai, and afterwards wrote them. So our Lord first spoke His own Gospel, both of promise and of precept, on the Mount, and His Evangelists have recorded it. Further, when He delivered it, He spoke by way of parallel to the Ten Commandments. And His stvle, moreover, corresponds to the authority which He assumes. It is of that solemn, measured, and severe character, which SECT. I.] TO BE EXPECTED. 67 bears on the face of it tokens of its belonging to One who spake ns none other man could speak. The Beatitudes, with which His Sermon opens, are an instance of this incommunicable style, which befitted, as far as human words could befit, God Incarnate. " Nor is this style peculiar to the Sermon on the Mount. All through the Gospels it is discernible, distinct from any other part of Scripture, showing itself in solemn declarations, canons, sentences, or sayings, such as legis- lators propound, and scribes and lawyers comment on. Surely everything our Saviour did and said is characterized by mingled simplicity and mystery. His emblematical actions, His typical miracles, His parables, His replies, His censures, all are evidences of a legislature in germ, afterwards to be developed, a code of divine truth which was ever to be before men's eyes, to be the subject of investigation and interpretation, and the guide in con- troversy. ' Verily, verily, I say unto you/ ' But, I say unto you,' are the tokens of a supreme Teacher and Prophet. " And thus the Fathers speak of His teaching. ' His sayings/ observes St. Justin, ' were short and concise ; for He was no rhetorician, but His word was the power of God.' And St. Basil, in like manner, ' Every deed and every word of our Saviour Jesus Christ is a canon of piety and virtue. When then thou hearest word or deed of His, do not hear it as by the way, or after a simple and carnal manner, but enter into the depth of His contempla- tions, become a communicant in truths mystically delivered tothee.'" 3 12. Moreover, while it is certain that developments of Uevelation proceeded all .through the Old Dispensation Proph. Office, Lcct. xii. [Via Med. vol. i. pp. 292-3]. F 2 68 DEVELOPMENTS OF DOCTKINE [Cfcf. II. down to the very end of our Lord's ministry, on the other hand, if we turn our attention to the beginnings of Apos- tolical teaching after His ascension, we shall find ourselves unable to fix an historical point at which the growth of doctrine ceased, and the rule of faith was once for all settled. Not on the day of Pentecost, for St. Peter had still to learn at Joppa that he was to baptize Cornelius ; not at Joppa and Caesarea, for St. Paul had to write his Epistles; not on the death of the last Apostle, for St. Ignatius had to establish the doctrine of Episcopacy ; not then, nor for centuries after, for the Canon of the New Tes- tament was still undetermined. Not in the Creed, which is no collection of definitions, but a summary of certain credenda, an incomplete summary, and, like the Lord's Prayer or the Decalogue, a mere sample of divine truths, especially of the more elementary. No one doctrine can be named which starts complete at first, and gains nothing afterwards from the investigations of faith and the attacks of heresy. The Church went forth from the old world in haste, as the Israelites from Egypt " with their dough before it was leavened, their kneading troughs being bound up in their clothes upon their shoulders." 13. Further, the political developments contained in the historical parts of Scripture are as striking as the pro- phetical and the doctrinal. Can any history wear a more human appearance than that of the rise and growth of the chosen people to whom I have just referred ? What had been determined in the counsels of the Lord of heaven and earth from the beginning, what was immutable, what was announced to Moses in the burning bush, is afterwards represented as the growth of an idea under successive emergencies. The Divine Voice in the bush had announced the Exodus of the children of Israel from Egypt and their SECT, l.j tO Bfc fcXfECTED. 69 entrance into Canaan ; and added, as a token of the cer- tainty of His purpose, " When tliou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain." Now this sacrifice or festival, which was but incidental and secondary in the great deliverance, is for a while the ultimate scope of the demands which Moses makes upon Pharaoh. " Thou shalt come, thou and the elders of Israel unto the King of Egypt, and ye shall say unto him, The Lord God of the Hebrews hath met with us, and now let us go, we beseech thee, three days' journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the Lord our God/' It had been added that Pharaoh would first refuse their request, but that after miracles he would let them go altogether, nay with "jewels of silver and gold, and raiment." Accordingly the first request of Moses was, " Let us go, we pray thee, three days' journey into the desert, and sacri- fice unto the Lord our God." Before the plague of frogs the warning is repeated, "Let My people go -that they may serve Me ;" and after it Pharaoh says, "I will let the people go, that they may do sacrifice unto the Lord." It occurs again before the plague of flies ; and after it Pharaoh offers to let the Israelites sacrifice in Egypt, which Moses refuses on the ground that they will have to " sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes." " We will go three days' journey into the wilder- ness," he proceeds, " and sacrifice to the Lord our God ;" and Pharaoh then concedes their sacrificing in the wilder- ness, " only," he says, " you shall not go very far away." The demand is repeated separately before the plagues of murrain, hail, and locusts, no mention being yet made of anything beyond a service or sacrifice in the wilderness. On the last of these interviews, Pharaoh asks an explana- tion, and Moses extends his claim : " We will go with our young and with our old, with our sons and with our 70 DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE [cfi. It. daughters, with our flocks and with our herds will we go, for we must hold a feast unto tho Lord." That it was an extension seems plain from Pharaoh's reply : " Go now ye that are men, and serve the Lord, for that ye did desire." Upon the plague of darkness Pharaoh concedes the ex- tended demand, excepting the flocks and herds ; but Moses reminds him that they were implied, though not expressed in the original wording : " Thou must give us also sacrifices and burnt offerings, that we may sacrifice unto the Lord our God." Even to the last, there was no intimation of their leaving Egypt for good ; the issue was left to be wrought out by the Egyptians. " All these thy servants," says Moses, " shall come down unto me, and bow down themselves unto me, saying, Get thee out and all the people that follow thec, and after that I will go out;" and, accordingly, after the judgment on the first-born, they were thrust out at midnight, with their flocks and herds, their kneading troughs and their dough, laden, too, with the spoils of Egypt, as had been fore-ordained, yet ap- parently by a combination of circumstances, or the com- plication of a crisis. Yet Moses knew that their departure from Egypt was final, for he took the bones of Joseph with him ; and that conviction broke on Pharaoh soon, when he and his asked themselves, " Why have we done this, that we have let Israel go from serving us?" But this progress of events, vague and uncertain as it seemed to be, notwithstanding the miracles which attended it, had been directed by Him who works out gradually what He has determined absolutely ; and it ended in the parting of the Red Sea, and the destruction of Pharaoh's host, on his pursuing them. Moreover, from what occurred forty years afterwards, when they were advancing upon the promised land, it would seem that the original grant of territory did not include the country east of Jordan, held in the event by SECT. I.] TO BE EXPECTED. 71 Reuben, Gad, and half the tribe of Manasseh ; at least they undertook at first to leave Sihon in undisturbed possession of his country, if he would let them pass through it, and only on his refusing his permission did they invade and appropriate it. 14. 6. It is in point to notice also the structure and style of Scripture, a structure so unsystematic and various, and a style so figui'ative and indirect, that no one would presume at first sight to say what is in it and what is not. It can- not, as it were, be mapped, or its contents catalogued ; but after all our diligence, to the end of our lives and to the end of the Church, it must be an unexplored and unsub- dued land, with heights and valleys, forests and streams, on the right and left of our path and close about us, full of concealed wonders and choice treasures. Of no doctrine whatever, which does not actually contradict what has been delivered, can it be peremptorily asserted that it is not in Scripture ; of no reader, whatever be his study of it, can it be said that he has mastered every doctrine which it con- tains. Butler's remarks on this subject were just now referred to. " The more distinct and particular know- ledge," he says, " of those things, the study of which the Apostle calls ' going on unto perfection/ " that is, of the more recondite doctrines of the Gospel, " and of the pro- phetic parts of revelation, like many parts of natural and even civil knowledge, may require very exact thought and careful consideration. The hindrances too of natural and of supernatural light and knowledge have been of the same kind. And as it is owned the whole scheme of Scripture is not yet understood, so, if it ever comes to be understood, before the ' restitution of all things/ and without miracu- lous interpositions, it must be in the same way as natural knowledge is come at, by the continuance and progress of 72 bfiVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE [cH. tt. learning and of liberty, and by particular persons attend- ing to, comparing, and pursuing intimations scattered up and down it, which are overlooked and disregarded by the generality of the world. For this is the way in which all improvements are made, by thoughtful men tracing on obscure hints, as it were, dropped us by nature accidentally, or which seem to come into our minds by chance. Nor is it at all incredible that a book, which has been so long in the possession of mankind, should contain many truths as yet undiscovered. For all the same phenomena, and the same faculties of investigation, from which such great discoveries in natural knowledge have been made in the present and last age, were equally in the possession of mankind several thousand years before. And possibly it might be intended that events, as they come to pass, should open and ascer- tain the meaning of several parts of Scripture/' ' Butler of course was not contemplating the case of new articles of faith, or developments imperative on our acceptance, but he surely bears witness to the probability of developments taking place in Christian doctrine considered in themselves, which is the point at present in question. 15. It may be added that, in matter of fact, all the defini- tions or received judgments of the early and medieval Church rest upon definite, even though sometimes obscure sentences of Scripture. Thus Purgatory may appeal to the " saving by fire," and "entering through much tribu- lation into the kingdom of God ;" the communication of the merits of the Saints to our " receiving a prophet's reward " for " receiving a prophet in the name of a prophet," and " a righteous man's reward " for " receiving a righteous man in the name of a righteous man ;" the Real Presence to "This is My Body;" Absolution to 4 ii. 3 ; vide also ii. 4, fin. BfcCT. I.] 10 Bfi EXPECTED. 73 " Whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted ;" Extreme Unction to " Anointing him with oil in the Name of the Lord ;" Voluntary poverty to " Sell all that thou hast ;" obedience to " He was in subjection to His parents ;" the honour paid to creatures, animate or inanimate, to Laudate Dominum in mnctis Ejus, and Adorate scabellum pedum Ejus ; and so of the rest 16. 7. Lastly, while Scripture nowhere recognizes itself or asserts the inspiration of those passages which are most essential, it distinctly anticipates the development of Christianity, both as a polity and as a doctrine. In one of our Lord's parables " the Kingdom of Heaven " is even compared to " a grain of mustard-seed, which a man took and hid in his field ; which indeed is the least of all seeds, but when it is grown it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree," and, as St. Mark words it, " shooteth out great branches, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof/' And again, in the same chapter of St. Mark, " So is the kingdom of God, as if a man should cast seed into the ground, and should sleep, and rise night and day, and the seed should spring and grow up, he knoweth not how ; for the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself." Here an internal element of life, whether principle or doctrine, is spoken of rather than any mere external manifestation; and it is observable that the spontaneous, as well as the gradual, character oi the growth is intimated. This description of the process corresponds to what has been above observed respecting, development, viz. that it is not an effect of wishing and resolving, or of forced enthusiasm, or of any mechanism of reasoning, or of any mere subtlety of intellect; but comes of its own innate power of expansion within the mind in its season, though with the use of reflection and 74 DEVELOPMENTS of DOCTRINE, ETC. [CH. u. argument and original thought, more or less as it may happen, with a dependence on the ethical growth of the mind itself, and with a reflex influence upon it. Again, the Parable of the Leaven describes the development oi doctrine in another respect, in its active, engrossing, and interpenetrating power. 17. From the necessity, then, of the case, from the history of all sects and parties in religion, and from the analogy and example of Scripture, we may fairly conclude that Christian doctrine admits of formal, legitimate, and true developments, that is, of developments contemplated by its Divine Author. The general analogy of the world, physical and moral, confirms this conclusion, as we are reminded by the great authority who has already been quoted in the course of this Section. " The whole natural world and government of it," says Butler, " is a scheme or system ; not a fixed, but a progressive one; a scheme in which the operation of various means takes up a great length of time before the ends they tend to can be attained. The change of seasons, the ripening of the fruits of the earth, the very history of a flower is an instance of this ; and so is human life. Thus vegetable bodies, and those of animals, though possibly formed at once, yet grow up by degrees to a mature state. And thus rational agents, who animate these latter bodies, are naturally directed to form each his own manners and character by the gradual gaming of knowledge and experience, and by a long course of action. Our existence is not only successive, as it must be of necessity, but one state of our life and being is appointed by God to be a preparation for another ; and that to be the means of attaining to another succeeding one : infancy to childhood, childhood to youth, youth to mature age. SECT. II.] INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY, ETC. 75 Men are impatient , and for precipitating things ; but the Author of Nature appears deliberate throughout His operations, accomplishing His natural ends by slow suc- cessive steps. And there is a plan of things beforehand laid out, which, from the nature of it, requires various systems of means, as well as length of time, in order to the carrying on its several parts into execution. Thus, in the daily course of natural providence, God operates in the very same manner as in the dispensation of Christianity, making one thing subservient to another ; this, to some- what farther; and so on, through a progressive series of means, which extend, both backward and forward, beyond our utmost view. Of this manner of operation, everything we see in the course of nature is as much an instance as any part of the Christian dispensation." 5 SECTION II. AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY TO BE EXPECTED. It has now been made probable that developments of Christianity were but natural, as time went on, and were to be expected ; and that these natural and true develop- ments, as being natui'al and true, were of course con- templated and taken into account by its Author, who in designing the work designed its legitimate results. These, whatever they turn out to be, may be called absolutely " the developments " of Christianity. That, beyond reason- able doubt, there are such is surely a great step gained in the inquiry ; it is a momentous i'act. The next question is, What are they ? and to a theologian, who could take a general view, and also possessed an intimate and minute 5 Analogy, ii. 4, ad Jin. 76 AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY [CH. it. knowledge, of its history, they would doubtless on the whole be easily distinguishable by their own characters, and require no foreign aid to point them out, no external authority to ratify them. But it is difficult to say who is exactly in this position. Considering that Christians, from the nature of the case, live under the bias of the doctrines, and in the very midst of the facts, and during the process of the controversies, which are to be the subject of criticism, since they are exposed to the prejudices of birth, education, place, personal attachment, engagements, and party, it can hardly be maintained that in matter of fact a true develop- ment carries with it always its own certainty even to the learned, or that history, past or present, is secure from the possibility of a variety of interpretations. 2. I have already spoken on this subject, and from a very different point of view from that which I am taking at present : " Prophets or Doctors are the interpreters of the reve- lation ; they unfold and define its mysteries, they illumi- nate its documents, they harmonize its contents, they apply its promises. Their teaching is a vast system, not to be comprised in a few sentences, not to be embodied in one code or treatise, but consisting of a certain body of Truth, pervading the Church like an atmosphere, irregular in its shape from its very profusion and exuberance ; at times separable only in idea from Episcopal Tradition, yet at times melting away into legend and fable ; partly written, partly unwritten, partly the interpretation, partly the supplement of Scripture, partly preserved in intellectual expressions, partly latent in the spirit and temper of Christians ; poured to and fro in closets and upon the housetops, in liturgies, in controversial works, in obscure fragments, in sermons, in popular prejudices, in local SECT. II.] TO BE EXPECTED. 7V customs. This I call Prophetical Tradition, existing primarily in the bosom of the Church itself, and recorded in such measure as Providence has determined in the writings of eminent men. Keep that which is committed to thy charge, is St. Paul's injunction to Timothy ; and for this reason, because from its vastness and indefiniteness it is especially exposed to corruption, if the Church fails in vigilance. This is that body of teaching which is offered to all Christians even at the present day, though in various forms and measures of truth, in different parts of Christen- dom, partly being a comment, partly an addition upon the articles of the Creed." 6 If this be true, certainly some rule is necessary for arranging and authenticating these various expressions and results of Christian doctrine. No one will maintain that all points of belief are of equal importance. " There are what may be called minor points, which we may hold to be true without imposing them as necessary ; " " there are greater truths and lesser truths, points which it is necessary, and points which it is pious to believe." 7 The simple question is, How are we to discriminate the greater from the less, the true from the false. 3. This need of an authoritative sanction is increased by considering, after M. Guizot's suggestion, that Christianity, though represented in prophecy as a kingdom, came into the world as an idea rather than an institution, and has had to wrap itself in clothing and fit itself with armour of its own providing, and to form the instruments and methods of its prosperity and warfare. If the developments, which have above been called moral, are to take place to any great extent, and without them it is difficult to see how Chris- tianity can exist at all, if only its relations towards civil c Tropb. Office, x. [Via Med. p. 250]. ' [Ibid. pp. 247, 254.] 78 AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY [CH. II. government have to be ascertained, or the qualifications for the profession of it have to be defined, surely an authority is necessary to impart decision to what is vague, and confidence to what is empirical, to ratify the successive steps of so elaborate a process, and to secure the validity of inferences which are to be made the premisses of more remote investigations. Tests, it is true, for ascertaining the correctness of developments in general may be drawn out, as I shall show in the sequel ; but they are insufficient for the guidance of individuals in the case of so large and complicated a pro- blem, as Christianity, though they may aid our inquiries and support our conclusions in particular points. They are of a scientific and controversial, not of a practical character, and are instruments rather than warrants of right decisions. Moreover, they rather serve as answers to objections brought against the actual decisions of autho- rity, than are proofs of the correctness of those decisions. While, then, on the one hand, it is probable that some means will be granted for ascertaining the legitimate and true developments of Revelation, it appears, on the other, that these means must of necessity be external to the deve- lopments themselves. Reasons shall be given in this Section for concluding that, in proportion to the probability of true developments of doctrine and practice in the Divine Scheme, so is the probability also of the appointment in that scheme of an external authority to decide upon them, thereby separating them from the mass of mere human speculation, extrava- gance, corruption, and error, in and out of which they grow. This is the doctrine of the infallibility of the Church ; for by infallibility I suppose is meant the power SECT. II.] TO BE EXPECTED. 79 of deciding whether this, that, and a third, and any number of theological or ethical statements are true. 6. 1. Let the state of the case be carefully considered. If the Christian doctrine, as originally taught, admits of true and important developments, as was argued in the foregoing Section, this is a strong antecedent argument in favour of a provision in the Dispensation forputting a seal of authority upon those developments. The probability of their being known to be true varies with that of their truth. The two ideas indeed are quite distinct, I grant, of revealing and of guaranteeing a truth, and they are often distinct in fact. There are various revelations all over the earth which do not carry with them the evidence of their divinity. Such are the inward suggestions and secret illuminations granted to so many individuals ; such are the traditionary doctrines which are found among the heathen, that " vague and unconnected family of religious truths, originally from God, but sojourning, without the sanction of miracle or a definite home, as pilgrims up and down the world, and discernible and separable from the corrupt legends with which they are mixed, by the spiritual mind alone." * There is nothing impossible in the notion of a revelation occurring without evidences that it is a revelation ; just as human sciences are a divine gift, yet are reached by our ordinary powers and have no claim on our faith. But Christianity is not of this nature : it is a revelation which comes to us as a revelation, as a whole, objectively, and with a profession of infallibility ; and the only question to be determined relates to the matter of the revelation. If then there are certain great truths, or duties, or ob- servances, naturally and legitimately resulting from the doctrines originally professed, it is but reasonable to include a Arians, ch. i. sect. 3 [p. 82, ed. 8J. 80 AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING ADTHOEITY [CH. 11. these true results in the idea of the revelation itself, to consider them parts of it, and if the revelation be not only true, but guaranteed as true, to anticipate that they too will come under the privilege of that guarantee. Chris- tianity, unlike other revelations of God's will, except the Jewish, of which it is a continuation, is an objective religion, or a revelation with credentials ; it is natural, I say, to view it wholly as such, and not partly siti generis, partly like others. Such as it begins, such let it be considered to continue; granting that certain large developments of it are true, they must surely be accredited as true. 6. 2. An objection, however, is often made to the doctrine of infallibility in limine, which is too important not to be taken into consideration. It is urged that, as all religious knowledge rests on moral evidence, not on demonstration, oar belief in the Church's infallibility must be of this character ; but what can be more absurd than a probable infallibility, or a certainty resting 011 doubt ? I believe, because I am sure ; and I am sure, because I suppose. Granting then that the gift of infallibility be adapted, when believed, to unite all intellects in one common con- fession, the fact that it is given is as difficult of proof as the developments which it is to prove, and nugatory therefore, and in consequence improbable in a Divine Scheme. The advocates of Rome, it has been urged, "insist on the necessity of an infallible guide in religious matters, as an argument that such a guide has really been accorded. Now it is obvious to inquire how individuals are to know with certainty that Rome is infallible . . . how any ground can be such as to bring home to the mind infallibly that she is infallible ; what conceivable proof amounts to more than a probability of the fact ; and what advantage is an infallible guide, if those who are to be guided have, SECT, II. J TO BE EXPECTED. 81 after all, no more than an opinion, as the Romanists call it, that she is infallible ? " 7. This argument, however, except when used, as is in- tended in this passage, against such persons as would remove all imperfection in the proof of Religion, is certainly a fallacious one. For since, as all allow, the Apostles were infallible, it tells against their infallibility, or the infalli- bility of Scripture, as truly as against the infallibility of the Church ; for no one will say that the Apostles were made infallible for nothing, yet we are only morally certain that they were infallible. Further, if we have but proba- ble grounds for the Church's infallibility, we have but the like for the impossibility of certain things, the necessity of others, the truth, the certainty of others ; and therefore the words infallibility, necessity, truth, and certainty ought all of them to be banished from the language. But why is it more inconsistent to speak *of an uncertain infallibility than of a doubtful truth or a contingent necessity, phrases which present ideas clear and undeniable ? In sooth we are playing with words when we use arguments of this sort. When we say that a person is infallible, we mean no more than that what he says is always true, always to be believed, always to be done. The term is resolvable into these phrases as its equivalents ; either then the phrases are inadmissible, or the idea of infallibility must be allowed. A probable infallibility is a probable gift of never erring ; a reception of the doctrine of a probable infallibility is faith and obedience towards a person founded on the probability of his never erring in his declarations or com- mands. What is inconsistent in this idea P Whatever then be the particular means of determining infallibility, the abstract objection may be put aside. 1 Proph. Office [Via Med. vol. i. p. 122]. 1 [_" It is very common to confuse infallibility with certitude, but the two O 82 AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY \JCU. II. 8. 3. Again, it is sometimes argued tliat such a dispensa- tion would destroy our probation, as dissipating doubt, precluding the exercise of faith, and obliging us to obey whether we wish it or no ; and it is urged that a Divine Voice spoke in the first age, and difficulty and darkness rest upon all subsequent ones ; as if infallibility and per- sonal judgment were incompatible ; but this is to confuse the subject. We must distinguish between a revelation and a reception of it, not between its earlier and later stages. A revelation, in itself divine, and guaranteed as such, may from first to last be received, doubted, argued against, perverted, rejected, by individuals according to the state of mind of each. Ignorance, misapprehension, unbelief, and other causes, do not at once cease to operate because the revelation is in itself true and in its proofs irrefragable. We have then no warrant at all for saying that an accredited revelation will exclude the existence of doubts and diffi- culties on the part of those whom it addresses, or dispense with anxious diligence on their part, though it may in its words stand for things quite distinct from each other. I remember for certain what I did yesterday, but still my memory is not infallible. I am quite clear that two and two makes four, but I often make mistakes in long addition sums. I have no doubt whatever that John or Richard is my true friend; but I have before now trusted those who failed me, ami I muy do so again before I die. I am quite certain that Victoria is our sovereign, and not her father, the Dukeof Kent, without any claim myself to the gift of infallibility, as I may do a virtuous action, without being impeccable. I may be certain that the Church is infallible, while I am myself a fallible mortal; otherwise I cannot be certain that the Supreme Being is infallible, unless I am infallible myself. Certitude is directed to one or other definite concrete proposition. I am certain of propositions one, two, three, four, or five, one by one, each by itself. I can be certain of one of them, without being certain of the rest : that I am certain of the first makes it neither likely nor unlikely that I am certain of the second : but, were I infallible, then I should be certain, not only of one of them, but of all." Essay on .Assent, ch. vii. sect. Ji._~] SECT. II.] TO BB EXPECTED. 83 own nature tend to do so. Infallibility does not interfere with moral probation; the two notions are absolutely distinct. It is no objection then to the idea of a per- emptory authority, such as I am supposing, that it lessens the task of personal inquiry, unless it be an objection to the authority of Revelation altogether. A Church, or a Council, or a Pope, or a Consent of Doctors, or a Consent of Christendom, limits the inquiries of the individual in no other way than Scripture limits them : it does limit them ; but, while it limits their range, it preserves intact their probationary character ; we are tried as really, though not on so large a field. To suppose that the doctrine of a per- manent authority in matters of faith interferes with our free-will and responsibility is, as before, to forget that there were infallible teachers in the first age, and heretics and schismatics in the ages subsequent. There may have been at once a supreme authority from first to last, and a moral judgment from first to last. Moreover, those who maintain that Christian truth must be gained solely by personal efforts are bound to show that methods, ethical and intellectual, are granted to individuals sufficient for gaining it ; else the mode of probation they advocate is less, not more, perfect than that which proceeds upon ex- ternal authority. On the whole, then, no argument against continuing the principle of objectiveness into the developments of Revelation arises out of the conditions of our moral responsibility. 9. 4. Perhaps it will be urged that the Analogy of Nature is against our anticipating the continuance of an external authority which has once been given ; because in the words of the profound thinker who has already been cited, " We are wholly ignorant what degree of new knowledge it were to be expected God would give mankind by revela- o 2 84 AN IHFALL1BLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY [cH. II. tion, upon supposition of His affording one ; or how far, and in what way, He would interpose miraculously to qualify them to whom He should originally make the revelation for communicating the knowledge given by it, and to secure their doing it to the age in which they should live, and to secure its being transmitted to posterity ;" and because " we are not in any sort able to judge whether it were to be expected that the revelation should have been committed to writing, or left to be handed down, and con- sequently corrupted, by verbal tradition, and at length sunk under it." 2 But this reasoning does not apply here, as has already been observed ; it contemplates only the abstract hypothesis of a revelation, not the fact of an exist- ing revelation of a particular kind, which may of course in various ways modify our state of knowledge, by settling some of those very points which, before it was given, we had no means of deciding. Nor can it, as I think, bo fairly denied that the argument from analogy in one point of view tells against anticipating a revelation at all, for an innovation upon the physical order of the world is by the very force of the terms inconsistent with its ordinary course. We cannot then regulate our antecedent view of the character of a revelation by a test which, applied simply, overthrows the very notion of a revelation alto- gether. Any how, Analogy is in some sort violated by the fact of a revelation, and the question before us only relates to the extent of that violation. 10. I will hazard a distinction here between the facts of revelation and its principles : the argument from Analogy is more concerned with its principles than with its facts. The revealed facts are special and singular, not analogous, from the nature of the case : but it is otherwise with the * Anal- ii. 3. SECT. II.] TO BK EXPECTED. 85 revealed principles ; these are common to all the works of God : and if the Author of Nature be the Author of Grace, it may be expected that, while the two systems of facts are distinct and independent, the principles displayed in them will be the same, and form a connecting link between them. In this identity of principle lies the Analogy of Natural and Revealed Religion, in Butler's sense of the word. The doctrine of the Incarnation is a fact, and cannot be paralleled by anything in nature ; the doctrine of Mediation is a principle, and is abundantly exemplified in its provisions. Miracles are facts ; inspiration is a fact ; divine teaching once for all, and a continual teach- ing, are each a fact ; probation by means of intellectual difficulties is a principle both in nature and in grace, and may be carried on in the system of grace either by a standing ordinance of teaching or by one definite act of teaching, and that with an analogy equally perfect in either case to the order of nature ; nor can we succeed in ai'guing from the analogy of that order against a standing guardian- ship of revelation without arguing also against its original bestowal. Supposing the order of nature once broken by the introduction of a revelation, the continuance of that revelation is but a question of degree; and the circum- stance that a work has begun makes it more probable than not that it will proceed. We have no reason to suppose that there is so great a distinction of dispensation between ourselves and the first generation of Christians, as that they had a living infallible guidance, and we have not. The case then stands thus : Revelation has introduced a new law of divine governance over and above those laws which appear in the natural course of the world ; and in consequence we are able to argue for the existence of a standing authority in matters of faith on the analogy oi Nature, and from the fact of Christianity. Preservation is 86 AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY [GET. II involved in the idea of creation. As the Creator rested on the seventh day from the work which He had made, yet He " worketh hitherto ;" so He gave the Creed once for all in the beginning, yet blesses its growth still, and pro- vides for its increase. His word " shall not return unto Him void, but accomplish " His pleasure. As creation argues continual governance, so are Apostles harbingers of Popes. 11. 5. Moreover, it must be borne in mind that, as the essence of all religion is authority and obedience, so the distinction between natural religion and revealed lies in this, that the one has a subjective authority, and the other an objective. Revelation consists in the manifestation of the Invisible Divine Power, or in the substitution of the voice of a Lawgiver for the voice of conscience. The Mipremacy of conscience is the essence of natural religion; the supremacy of Apostle, or Pope, or Church, or Bishop, is the essence of revealed ; and when such external autho- rity is taken away, the mind falls back again of necessity npon that inward guide which it possessed even before Revelation was vouchsafed. Thus, what conscience ia in the system of nature, such is the voice of Scripture, or of the Church, or of the Holy See, ns we may determine it, in the system of Revelation. It may be objected, in- deed, that conscience is not infallible ; it is true, but still it is ever to be obeyed. And this is just the prerogative which controversialists assign to the See of St. Peter ; it is not in all cases infallible, it may err beyond its special province, but it has in all cases a claim on our obedience. "All Catholics and heretics," says Bellarmine, " tigree in two things : first, that it is possible for the Pope, even as pope, and with his own assembly of councillors, or with General Council, to err in particular controversies of fact. SECT. II.] TO BE EXPECTED. 87 which chiefly depend on human information and testimony ; secondly, that it is possible for him to err as a private Doctor, even in universal questions of right, whether of faith or of morals, and that from ignorance, as sometimes happens to other doctors. Next, all Catholics agree in other two points, not, however, with heretics, but solely with each other : first, that the Pope with General Council cannot err, either in framing decrees of faith or general precepts of morality; secondly, that the Pope when determining anything in a doubtful matter, whether by himself or with his own particular Council, whether it is possible for him to err or not, is to be obeyed by all the faithful/' 8 And as obedience to conscience, even supposing conscience ill- informed, tends to the improvement of our moral nature, and ultimately of our knowledge, so obedience to our ecclesiastical superior may subserve our growth in illumi- nation and sanctity, even though he should command what is extreme or inexpedient, or teach what is external to his legitimate province. 12. 6. The common sense of mankind does but support a conclusion thus forced upon us by analogical considerations. It feels that the very idea of revelation implies a present informant and guide, and that an infallible one ; not a mere abstract declaration of Truths unknown before to man, or a record of history, or the result of an antiquarian research, but a message and a lesson speaking to this man and that This is shown by the popular notion which lias prevailed among us since the Reformation, that the Bible itself is such a guide ; and which succeeded in overthrow- ing the supremacy of Church and Pope, for the very reason 3 De Rom. Pont. iv. 2. [Seven years ago, it is scarcely necessary to say, the Vatican Council determined that the Pope, ex cathedrd, has the same Infallibility as the Church. This does nqt affect the argument in the text.] 88 AN INFALLIBLE DEVELOPING AUTHORITY [CH. II. that it was a rival authority, not resisting merely, but supplanting it. In proportion, then, as we find, in matter of fact, that the inspired Yolume is not adapted or intended fco subserve that purpose, are we forced to revert to that living and present Guide, who, at the era of our rejection of her, had been so long recognized as thedispenserof Scripture, according to times and circumstances, and the arbiter of all true doctrine and holy practice to her children. We feel a need, and she alone of all things under heaven supplies it. We are told that God has spoken. Where ? In a book P We have tried it and it disappoints ; it disappoints us, that most holy and blessed gift, not from fault of its own, but because it is used for a purpose for which it was not given. The Ethiopian's reply, when St. Philip asked him if he understood what he was reading, is the voice of nature : " How can I, unless some man shall guide me ? " The Church undertakes that office ; she does what none else can do, and this is the secret of her power. " The human mind," it has been said, " wishes to be rid of doubt in religion ; and a teacher who claims infallibility is readily believed on his simple word. We see this con- stantly exemplified in the case of individual pretenders among ourselves. In Romanism the Church pretends to it ; she rids herself of competitors by forestalling them. And probably, in the eyes of her children, this is not the least persuasive argument for her infallibility, that she alone of all Churches dares claim it, as if a secret instinct and involuntary misgivings restrained those rival communions which go so far towards affecting it." * These sentences, whatever be the errors of their wording, surely express a great truth. The most obvious answer, then, to the question, why we yield to the authority of the Church in the questions and developments of faith, is, that some authority there must be if there is a revelation given, and Proph. Office [Via Med. vol. i. p. 117}. SECT. II.] TO BE EXPECTED. 89 other authority there is none but she. A revelation is not given, if there be no authority to decide what it is that is given. In the words of St. Peter to her Divine Master and Lord, " To whom shall we go ? " Nor must it be for- gotten in confirmation, that Scripture expressly calls the Church " the pillar and ground of the Truth," and promises her as by covenant that "the Spirit of the Lord that is upon her, and His words which He has put in her mouth shall not depart out of her mouth, nor out of the mouth of her seed, nor out of the mouth of her seed's seed, from henceforth and for ever." 6 13. 7. And if the very claim to infallible arbitration in religious disputes is of so weighty importance and interest in all ages of the world, much more is it welcome at a time like the present, when the human intellect is so busy, and thought so fertile, and opinion so manifold. The abso- lute need of a spiritual supremacy is at present the strongest of arguments in favour of the fact of its supply. Surely, either an objective revelation has not been given, or it has been provided with means for impressing its objectiveness on the world. If Christianity be a social religion, as it certainly is,and if it be based on certain ideas acknowledged as divine, or a creed, (which shall here be assumed,) and if these ideas have various aspects, and make distinct impres- sions on different minds, and issue in consequence in a multiplicity of developments, true, or false, or mixed, as has been shown, what power will suffice to meet and to do justice to these conflicting conditions, but a supreme authority ruling and reconciling individual judgments by a divine right and a recognized wisdom ? In barbarous times the will is reached through the senses ; but in an age in which reason, as it is called, is the standard qf f } Tim. iii. J.6 ; Is. la. 2}.. 90 AN INFALLIBLE DfiVELOI'lNQ AUTHORITY [CH. IL truth and right, it is abundantly evident to any one, who mixes ever so little with the world, that, if things are left to themselves, every individual will have his own view of them, and take his own course; that two or three will agree to-day to part company to-morrow ; that Scripture will be read in contrary ways, and history, according to the apologue, will have to different comers its silver shield and its golden ; that philosophy, taste, prejudice, passion, party, caprice, will find no common measure, unless there be some supreme power to control the mind and to compel agreement. There can be no combination on the basis of truth without an organ of truth. As cultivation brings out the colours of flowers, and domestication changes the character of animals, so does education of necessity develope differences of opinion ; and while it is impossible to lay down first principles in which all will unite, it is utterly unreasonable to expect that this man should yield to that, or all to one. I do not say there are no eternal truths, such as the poet proclaims, 6 which all acknowledge in pri- vate, but that there are none sufficiently commanding to be the basis of public union and action. The only general persuasive in matters of conduct is authority; that is, (when truth is in question,) a judgment which we feel to be superior to our own. If Christianity is both social and dog- matic, and intended for all ages, it must humanly speaking have an infallible expounder. Else you will secure unity of form at the loss of unity of doctrine, or unity of doctrine at the loss of unity of form ; you will have to choose be- tween a comprehension of opinions and a resolution into parties, between latitudinarian and sectarian error. You may be tolerant or intolerant of contrarieties of thought, but contrarieties you will have. By the Church of England a hollow uniformity is preferred to an infallible chair ; ancl ' Qv y&p TI vvv "y Ka,x.6fs t SECT. II.] TO BE EXPECTED. 91 by the sects of England, an interminable division. Ger- many and Geneva began with persecution, and have ended in scepticism. The doctrine of infallibility is a less violent hypothesis than this sacrifice either of faith or of charity. It secures the object, while it gives definiteness and force to the matter, of the Revelation. 14. 8. I have called the doctrine of Infallibility an hypo- thesis : let it be so considered for the sake of argument, that is, let it be considered to be a mere position, supported by no direct evidence, but required by the facts of the case, and reconciling them with each other. That hypothesis is indeed, in matter of fact, maintained and acted on in the largest portion of Christendom, and from time immemorial; but let this coincidence be accounted for by the need. Moreover, it is not a naked or isolated fact, but the ani- mating principle of a large scheme of doctrine which the need itself could not simply create ; but again, let this system be merely called its development. Yet even as an hypothesis, which has been held by one out of various communions, it may not be lightly put aside. Some hypothesis, this or that, all parties, all controversialists, all historians must adopt, if they would treat of Christianity at all. Gieseler's "Text Book" bears the profession of being a dry analysis of Christian history; yet on inspec- tion it will be found to be written on a positive and definite theory, and to bend facts to meet it. An unbeliever, as Gibbon, assumes one hypothesis, and an Ultra-montane, as Baronius, adopts another. The School of Hurd and Newton hold, as the only true view of history, that Christianity slept for centuries upon centuries, except among those whom historians call heretics. Others speak as if the oath of supremacy or the cong d'elire could be made the measure of St. Ambrose, and they fit the Thirty- 92 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS OF DOCTRINE [CH. II. nine Articles on the fervid Tertullian. The question is, which of all these theories is the simplest, the most natural, the most persuasive. Certainly the notion of development under infallible authority is not a less grave, a less winning hypothesis, than the chance and coincidence of events, or the Oriental Philosophy, or the working of Antichrist, to account for the rise of Christianity and the formation of its theology. SECTION III. THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS OF DOCTRINE THE PROBABLE FULFILMENT OF THAT EXPECTATION. I have been arguing, in respect to the revealed doctrine, given to us from above in Christianity, first, that, in con- sequence of its intellectual character, and as passing through the minds of so many generations of men, and as applied by them to so many purposes, and as investigated so curiously as to its capabilities, implications, and bearings, it could not but grow or develope, as time went on, into a large theological system ; next, that, if development must be, then, whereas Revelation is a heavenly gift, He who gave it virtually has not given it, unless He lias also secured it from perversion and corruption, in all such development as comes upon it by the necessity of its nature, or, in other words, that that intellectual action through successive generations, which is the organ of development, must, so far forth as it can claim to have been put in charge of the Revelation, be in its determina- tions infallible. Passing from these two points, I come next to the question whether in the history of Christianity there is any fulfilment of such anticipation as I have insisted on, SECT. III.] TBE FULFILMENT 0* THAT EXPECTATION. 93 whether in matter-of-fact doctrines, rites, and usages have grown up round the Apostolic Creed and have interpene- trated its Articles, claiming to be part of Christianity and looking like those additions which we are in search of. The answer is, that such additions there are, and that they are found just where they might be expected, in the authoritative seats and homes of old tradition, the Latin and Greek Churches. Let me enlarge on this point 2. T observe, then, that, if the idea of Christianity, aa originally given to us from heaven, cannot but contain much which will be only partially recognized by us as included in it and only held by us unconsciously ; and if again, Christianity being from heaven, all that is neces- sarily involved in it, and is evolved from it, is from heaven, and if, on the other hand, large accretions actually do exist, professing to be its true and legitimate results, our first im- pression naturally is, that these must be the very develop- ments which they profess to be. Moreover, the very scale on which they have been made, their high antiquity yet present promise, their gradual formation yet precision, their harmonious order, dispose the imagination most forcibly towards the belief that a teaching so consistent with itself, so well balanced, so young and so old, not obsolete after so many centuries, but vigorous and pro- gressive still, is the very development contemplated in the Divine Scheme. These doctrines are members of one family, and suggestive, or correlative, or confirmatory, or illustrative of each other. One furnishes evidence to another, and all to each of them ; if this is proved, that becomes probable ; if this and that are both probable, but for different reasons, each adds to the other its own proba- bility. The Incarnation is the antecedent of the doctrine of Mediation, and the archetype both of the Sacramental 94 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE [CH. II. principle and of the merits of Saints. From the doctrine of Mediation follow the Atonement, the Mass, the merits of Martyrs and Saints, their invocation and cultits. From the Sacramental principle come the Sacraments properly so called ; the unity of the Church, and the Holy See as its type and centre; the authority of Councils ; the sanctity of rites; the veneration of holy places, shrines, images, vessels, furniture, and vestments. Of the Sacraments, Baptism is developed into Confirmation on the one hand ; into Penance, Purgatory, and Indulgences on the other ; and the Eucha- rist into the Real Presence, adoration of the Host, Resur- rection of the body, and the virtue of relics. Again, the doctrine of the Sacraments leads to the doctrine of Justifica- tion ; Justification to that of Original Sin ; Original Sin to the merit of Celibacy. Nor do these separate developments stand independent of each other, but by cross relations they are connected, and grow together while they grow from one. The Mass and Real Presence are parts of one ; the venera- tion of Saints and their relics are parts of one; their intercessory power and the Purgatorial State, and again the Mass and that State are correlative ; Celibacy is the characteristic mark of Monachism and of the Priesthood. You must accept the whole or reject the whole ; attenuation does but enfeeble, and amputation mutilate. It is trifling to receive all but something which is as integral as any other portion ; and, on the other hand, it is a solemn thing to accept any part, for, before you know where you are, you may be carried on by a stern logical necessity to accept the whole. 3. Next, we have to consider that from first to last other developments there are none, except those which have possession of Christendom ; none, that is, of prominence and permanence sufficient to deserve the name. In early SECT. III.] THE FULFILMENT OF THAT EXPECTATION. 95 times the heretical doctrines were confessedly barren and short-lived, and could not stand their ground against Catholicism. As to the medieval period I am not aware that the Greeks present more than a negative opposition to the Latins. And now in like manner the Tridentine Creed is met by no rival developments ; there is no antago- nist system. Criticisms, objections, protests, there are in plenty, but little of positive teaching anywhere; seldom an attempt on the part of any opposing school to master its own doctrines, to investigate their sense and bearing, to determine their relation to the decrees of Trent and their distance from them. And when at any time this attempt is by chance in any measure made, then an incu- rable contrariety does but come to view between portions of the theology thus developed, and a war of principles ; an impossibility moreover of reconciling that theology with the general drift of the formularies in which its elements occur, and a consequent appearance of unfairness and sophistry in adventurous persons who aim at forcing them into consistency ; 7 and, further, a prevalent understanding of the truth of this representation, authorities keeping silence, eschewing a hopeless enterprise and discouraging it in others, and the people plainly intimating that they think both doctrine and usage, antiquity and development, of very little matter at all ; and, lastly, tlio evident despair of even the better sort of men, who, in consequence, when they set great schemes on foot, as for the conversion of the heathen world, are afraid to agitate the question of the doctrines to which it is to be converted, lest through the * O opened door they should lose what they have, instead of gaining what they have not. To the weight of recom- mendation which this contrast throws upon the develop- ments commonly called Catholic, must be added the 7 [Vid. Via Media, vol. ii. pp. 251 341. J 96 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS OP DOCTRINE. [cH. II. argument which arises from the coincidence of their consistency and permanence, with their claim of an infal- lible sanction, a claim, the existence of which, in some quarter or other of the Divine Dispensation, is, as we have already seen, antecedently probable. All these things being considered, I think few persons will deny the very strong presumption which exists, that, if there must be and are in fact developments in Christianity, the doctrines propounded by successive Popes and Councils, through so many ages, are they. A further presumption in behalf of these doctrines arises from the general opinion of the world about them. Chris- tianity being one, all its doctrines are necessarily develop- ments of one, and, if so, are of necessity consistent with each other, or form a whole. Now the world fully enters into this view of those well-known developments which claim the name of Catholic. It allows them that title, it considers them to belong to one family, and refers them to one theological system. It is scarcely necessary to set about proving what is urged by their opponents even more strenuously than by their champions. Their opponents avow that they protest, not against this doctrine or that, but against one and all ; and they seem struck with wonder and perplexity, not to say with awe, at a consist- ency which they feel to be superhuman, though they would not allow it to be divine. The system is confessed on all hands to bear a character of integrity and indivisibility upon it, both at first view and on inspection. Hence such sayings as the "Totajacet Babylon" of the distich. Luther did but a part of the work, Calvin another portion, Socinus finished it. To take up with Luther, and to reject Calvin and Socinus, would be, according to that epigram, like living in a house without a roof to it. This, I say, ia SECT. III.] THE FULFILMENT OP THAT EXPECTATION. 97 no private judgment of this man or that, but the common opinion and experience of all countries. The two great divisions of religion feel it, Roman Catholic and Protestant, between whom the controversy lies ; sceptics and liberals, who are spectators of the conflict, feel it ; philosophers feel it. A school of divines there is, I grant, dear to memory, who have not felt it; and their exception will have its weight, till we reflect that the particular theology which they advocate has not the prescription of success, never has been realized in fact, or, if realized for a moment, had no stay ; moreover, that, when it has been enacted by human authority, it bas scarcely travelled beyond the paper on which it was printed, or out of the legal forms in which it was embodied. But, putting the weight of these revered names at the highest, they do not constitute more than an exception to the general rule, such as is found in every sub- ject that comes into discussion. 5. And this general testimony to the oneness of Catholicism extends to its past teaching relatively to its present, as well as to the portions of its present teaching one with another. J^o one doubts, with such exception as has just been allowed, that the Roman Catholic communion of this day is the successor and representative of the Medieval Church, or that the Medieval Church is the legitimate heir of the Nicene ; even allowing that it is a question whether a line cannot be drawn between the Nicene Church and the Church which preceded it. On the whole, all parties will agree that, of all existing systems, the present communion of Rome is the nearest approximation in fact to the Church of the Fathers, possible though some may think it, to be nearer still to that Church on paper. Did St. Atha- nasius or St. Ambrose come suddenly to life, it cannot be doubted what communion he would take to be his H 98 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS, ETC. [CH. II. SECT. III. own. All surely will agree that these Fathers, with whatever opinions of their own, whatever protests, if we will, would find themselves more at home with such men as St. Bernard or St. Ignatius Loyola, or with the lonely priest in his lodging, or the holy sisterhood of mercy, or the unlettered crowd before the altar, than with the teachers or with the members of any other creed. And may we not add, that were those same Saints, who once sojourned, one in exile, one on embassy, at Treves, to come more northward still, and to travel until they reached another fair city, seated among groves, green meadows, and calm streams, the holy brothers would turn from many a high aisle and solemn cloister which they found there, and ask the way to some small chapel where mass was said in the populous alley or forlorn suburb? And, on the other hand, can any one who has but heard his name, and cursorily read his history, doubt for one instant how, in turn, the people of England, " we, our princes, our priests, and our pro- phets," Lords and Commons, Universities, Ecclesiastical Courts, marts of commerce, great towns, country parishes, would deal with Athanasius, Athanasius, who spent his long years in fighting against sovereigns for a theological term? CHAPTER III. ON THE HISTORICAL ARGUMENT IN BEHALF OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS. SECTION I. METHOD OF PROOF. IT seems, then, that we have to deal with a case something like the following : Certain doctrines come to us, professing to be Apostolic, and possessed of such high antiquity that, though we are only able to assign the date of their formal establishment to the fourth, or the fifth, or the eighth, or the thirteenth century, as it may happen, yet their substance may, for what appears, be coeval with the Apostles, and be expressed or implied in texts of Scripture. Further, these existing doctrines are universally considered, without any question, in each age to be the echo of the doctrines of the times immediately preceding them, and thus arc continually thrown back to a date indefinitely early, even though their ultimate junction with the Apostolic Creed be out of sight and unascertainable. Moreover, they are confessed to form one body one with another, so that to reject one is to disparage the rest; and they include within the range of their system even those primary articles of faith, as the Incarnation, which many an impugner of the said doctrinal system, as a system, professes to accept, 100 METHOD OF PROOF. [CH. III. and which, do what he will, he cannot intelligibly separate, whether in point of evidence or of internal character, from others which he disavows. Further, these doctrines occupy the whole field of theology, and leave nothing to be supplied, except in detail, by any other system ; while, in matter of fact, no rival system is forthcoming, so that we have to oboose between this theology and none at all. Moreover, this theology alone makes provision for that guidance of opinion and conduct, which seems externally to be the special aim of Revelation ; and fulfils the promises of Scripture, by adapting itself to the various problems of thought and practice which meet us in life. And, further, it is the nearest approach, to say the least, to the religious sentiment, and what is called ethos, of the early Church, nay, to that of the Apostles and Prophets ; for all will agree so far as this, that Elijah, Jeremiah, the Baptist, and St. Paul are in their history and mode of life (I do not speak of measures of grace, no, nor of doctrine and conduct, for these are the points in dispute, but) in what is external and meets the eye (and this is no slight resem- blance when things are viewed as a whole and from a distance), these saintly and heroic men, I say, are more like a Dominican preacher, or a Jesuit missionary, or a Carmelite friar, more like St. Toribio, or St. Vincent Ferrer, or St. Francis Xavier, or St. Alphonso Liguori, than to any individuals, or to any classes of men, that can be found in other communions. And then, in addition, there is the high antecedent probability that Providence would watch over His own work, and would direct and ratify those developments of doctrine which were inevitable. 2. If this is, on the whole, a true view of the general shape under which the existing boJy of developments, commonly 8ICT. I.] METHOD Ol? 1'UOOF. 101 called Catholic, present, themselves before us, antecedently to our looking into the particular evidence 011 which they stand, I think we shall be at no loss to determine what both logical truth and duty prescribe to us as to our reception of them. It is very little to say that we should treat them as we are accustomed to treat other alleged facts and truths and the evidence for them, such as come to us with a fair presumption in their favour. Such are of every day's occurrence ; and what is our behaviour towards them ? We meet them, not with suspicion and criticism, but with a frank confidence. We do not in the first instance exercise our reason upon opinions which are received, but our faith. We do not begin with doubting; we take them on trust, and we put them on trial, and that, not of set purpose, but spontaneously. We prove them by using them, by applying them to the subject-matter, or the evidence, or the body of circumstances, to which they belong, as if they gave it its interpretation or its colour as a matter of course ; and only when they fail, in the event, in illustrating phenomena or harmonizing facts, do we discover that we must reject the doctrines or the statements which we had in the first instance taken for granted. Again, we take the evidence for them, whatever it bo, as a whole, as forming a combined proof; and we interpret what is obscure in separate portions by such portions as are clear. Moreover, we bear with these in proportion to the strength of the antecedent probability in their favour, we are patient with difficulties in then? application, with apparent objections to them drawn from other matters of fact, deficiency in their comprehensiveness, or want of neatness in their working, provided their claims on our attention are considerable. 3. Thus most men take Nevvt>n's theory of gravitation for METHOD Of PROOF. [OS. III. granted, because it is generally received, and use it without rigidly testing it first, each for himself, (as it can be tested,) by phenomena; and if phenomena are found which it does not satisfactorily solve, this does not trouble us, for a way there must be of explaining them, con- sistently with that theory, though it does not occur to our- selves. Again, if we found a concise or obscure passage in one of Cicero's letters to Atticus, we should not scruple to admit as its true explanation a more explicit statement in his Ad Familiares. ^schylus is illustrated by Sophocles in point of language, and Thucydides by Aristophanes, in point of history. Horace, Persius, Suetonius, Tacitus, and Juvenal may be made to throw light upon each other. Even Plato may gain a commentator in Plotinus, and St. Anselm is interpreted by St. Thomas. Two writers, indeed, may be already known to differ, and then we do not join them together as fellow- witnesses to common truths; Luther has taken on himself to explain St. Augustine, and Voltaire, Pascal, without persuading the world that they have a claim to do so ; but in no case do we begin with asking whether a comment does not disagree with its text, when there is a prima facie congruity between them. We elucidate the text by the comment, though, or rather be- cause, the comment is fuller and more explicit than the text 4. Thus too we deal with Scripture, when we have to interpret the prophetical text and the types of the Old Testament. The event which is the development is also the interpretation of the prediction ; it provides a fulfil- ment by imposing a meaning. And we accept certain events as the fulfilment of prophecy from the broad correspondence of the one with the other, in spite of many incidental difficulties. The difficulty, for instance, in accounting for the fact that the dispersion of the Jews SECT. I.] METHOD OP PROOF. 103 followed upon their keeping, not their departing from their Law, does not hinder us from insisting on their present state as an argument against the infidel. Again, we readily submit our reason on competent authority, and accept certain events as an accomplishment of predictions, which seem very far removed from them ; as in the passage, " Out of Egypt have I called My Son." Nor do we find a difficulty, when St. Paul appeals to a text of the Old Testament, which stands otherwise in our Hebrew copies ; as the words, " A body hast Thou prepared Me." We receive such difficulties on faith, and leave them to take care of themselves. Much less do we consider mere fulness in the interpretation, or definiteness, or again strangeness, as a sufficient reason for depriving the text, or the action to which it is applied, of the advantage of such interpretation. We make it no objection that the words themselves come short of it, or that the sacred writer did not contemplate it, or that a previous fulfilment satisfies it. A reader who came to the inspired text by himself, beyond the influence of that traditional acceptation which happily encompasses it, would be surprised to be told that the Prophet's words, l< A virgin shall conceive," &c., or "Let all the Angels of God worship Him," refer to our Lord ; but assuming the intimate connexion between Judaism and Christianity, and the inspiration of the New Testament, we do not scruple to believe it. We rightly feel that it is no prejudice to our receiving the prophecy of Balaam in its Christian meaning, that it is adequately fulfilled in David ; or the history of Jonah, that it is poetical in character and has a moral in itself like an apo- logue ; or the meeting of Abraham and Melchizcdek, that it is too brief and simple to mean any great thing, as St. Paul interprets it. 5. Butler corroborates these remarks, when speaking of 104 METflOC OF PROOf. [CH. ttl. tlie particular evidence for Christianity. " The obscurity or unintelligibleness," he says, " of one part of a prophecy does not in any degree invalidate the proof of foresight, arising from the appearing completion of those other parts which are understood. For the case is evidently the same as if those parts, which are not understood, were lost, or not written at all, or written in an unknown tongue. Whether this observation be com- monly attended to or not, it is so evident that one can scarce bring one's self to set down an instance in com- mon matters to exemplify it/' 1 He continues, "Though a man should be incapable, for want of learning, or oppor- tunities of inquiry, or from not having turned his studies this way, even so much as to judge whether particular prophecies have been throughout completely fulfilled; yet he may see, in general, that they have been fulfilled to such a degree, as, upon very good ground, to be convinced of foresight more than human in such prophecies, and of such events being intended by them. For the same reason also, though, by means of the deficiencies in civil history, and the different accounts of historians, the most learned should not be able to make out to satisfaction that such parts of the prophetic history have been minutely and throughout fulfilled ; yet a very strong proof of fore- sight may arise from that general completion of them which is made out; as much proof of foresight, perhaps, as the Giver of prophecy intended should ever be afforded by such parts of prophecy ." 6. He illustrates this by the parallel instance of fable and concealed satire. " A man might be assured that he un- derstood what an author intended by a fable or parable, related without any application or moral, merely from see- 1 Anal. ii. 7. SECT, i.] METHOD 6* pftoof. 105 ing it to be easily capable of such application, and that such a moral might naturally be deduced from it. And he might be fully assured that such persons and events were intended in a satirical writing, merely from its being applicable to them. And, agreeably to the last observa- tion, he might be in a good measure satisfied of it, though he were not enough informed in affairs, or in the story of such persons, to understand half the satire. For his satis- faction, that he understood the meaning, the intended meaning, of these writings, would be greater or less, in proportion as he saw the general turn of them to be capa- ble of such application, and in proportion to the number of particular things capable of it." And he infers hence, that if a known course of events, or the history of a person as our Lord, is found to answer on the whole to the pro- phetical text, it becomes fairly the right interpretation of that text, in spite of difficulties in detail. And this rule of interpretation admits of an obvious application to the parallel case of doctrinal passages, when a certain creed, which professes to have been derived from Revelation, comes recommended to us on strong antecedent grounds, and presents no strong opposition to the sacred text. The same author observes that the first fulfilment of a prophecy is no valid objection to a second, when what seems like a second has once taken place ; and, in like manner, an interpretation of doctrinal texts may be literal, exact, and sufficient, yet in spite of all this may not embrace what is really the full scope of their meaning ; and that fuller scope, if it so happen, may be less satis- factory and precise, as an interpretation, tiian their primary and narrow sense. Thus, if the Protestant inter- pretation of the sixth chapter of St. John were true and sufficient for its letter, (which of course I do not grant,) that would not hinder the Roman, which at least isquite com- patible with the text, being the higher sense and the only 106 METHOD 0* PROOF. [CH. HI. rightful. In such cases the justification of the larger and higher interpretation lies in some antecedent probability, such as Catholic consent ; and the ground of the narrow is the context, and the rules of grammar ; and, whereas the argument of the critical commentator is that the sacred text need not mean more than the letter, those who adopt a deeper view of it maintain, as Butler in the case of prophecy, that we have no warrant for putting a limit to the sense of words which are not human but divine. 7. Now it is but a parallel exercise of reasoning to interpret the previous history of a doctrine by its later development, and to consider that it contains the later in posse and in the divine intention ; and the grudging and jealous temper, which refuses to enlarge the sacred text for the fulfilment of prophecy, is the very same that will occupy itself in carping at the Ante-nicene testimonies for Nicene or Medieval doctrines and usages. When " I and My Father are One " is urged in proof of our Lord's unity with the Father, heretical disputants do not see why the words must be taken to denote more than a unity of will. When "This is My Body" is alleged as a warrant for the change of the Bread into the Body of Christ, the} 7 explain away the words into a figure, because such is their most obvious interpretation. And, in like manner, when Roman Catholics urge St. Gregory's invocations, they are told that these are but rhetorical ; or St. Clement's allusion to Purgatory, that perhaps it was Platonism ; or Origen's language about praying to Angels and the merits of Martyrs, that it is but an instance of his heterodoxy ; or St. Cyprian's exaltation of the Cathedra Pctri, that he need not be contemplating more than a figurative or abstract see ; or the general testimony to the spiritual authority of Rome in primitive times, that it arose from SECT. I.] METHOD OP ffcOOf. 107 her temporal greatness ; or Tertullian's language about Tradition and the Church, that he took a lawyer's view of those subjects ; whereas the early condition, and the evidence, of each doctrine respectively, ought consistently to be interpreted by means of that development which was ultimately attained. 8. Moreover, since, as above shown, the doctrines all together make up one integral religion, it follows that the several evidences which respectively support those doctrines belong to a whole, and must be thrown into a common stock, and all are available in the defence of any. A collection of weak nvidences makes up a strong evidence ; again, one strong Argument imparts cogency to collateral arguments which are in themselves weak. For instance, as to the miracles, whether of Scripture or the Church, " the number of thoso which carry with them their own proof now, and are believed for their own sake, is small, and they furnish the grounds on which we receive the rest." ' Again, no one would fancy it necessary, before receiving St. Matthew's Gospel, to find primitive testimony in behalf of every chapter and verse : when only part is proved to have been in existence in ancient times, the whole is proved, because that part is but part of a whole ; and when the whole is proved,it may shelter such parts asforsorne incidental reason have less evidence of their antiquity. Again, it would be enough to show that St. Augustine knew the Italic version of the Scriptures, if he quoted it once or twice. And, in like manner, it will be generally admitted that the proof of a Second Person in the Godhead lightens greatly the burden of proof necessary for belief in a Third Person ; and that, the Atonement being in some sort a correlative of eternal punishment, the evidence for the former doctrine * [On Miracles, Essay ii. 111.] 108 METHOD 0* fROOP. [Cfl. 111. virtually increases the evidence for the latter. And so, a Protestant controversialist would feel that it told little, except as an omen of victory, to reduce an opponent to a denial of Transubstantiation, if he still adhered firmly to the Invocation of Saints, Purgatory, the Seven Sacraments, and the doctrine of merit ; and little too for one of his own party to condemn the adoration of the Host, the supremacy of Rome, the acceptableness of celi- bacy, auricular confession, communion under one kind, and tradition, if he was zealous for the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. 9. The principle on which these remarks are made has the sanction of some of the deepest of English Divines. Bishop Butler, for instance, who has so often been quoted here, thus argues in behalf of Christianity itself, though con- fessing at the same time the disadvantage which in conse- quence the revealed system lies under. " Probable proofs," he observes, " by being added, not only increase the evi- dence, but multiply it. Nor should I dissuade any one from setting down wliat he thought made for the contrary side. . . . The truth of our religion, like the truth of com- mon matters, is to be judged by all the evidence taken together. And unless the whole series of things which may be alleged in this argument, and every particular thing in it, can reasonably be supposed to have been by accident (for here the stress of the argument for Christianity lies), then is the truth of it proved ; in like manner, as if, in any common case, numerous events acknowledged were to be alleged in proof of any other event disputed, the truth of the disputed event would be proved, not only if any one of the acknowledged ones did of itself clearly imply it, but though no one of them singly did so, if the whole of the acknowledged events, SECT. I.] METHOD OP PROOF. 109 taken together, could not in reason be supposed to have happened, unless the disputed one were true. " It is obvious how much advantage the nature of this evidence gives to those persons who attack Christianity, especially in conversation. For it is easy to show, in a short and lively manner, that such and such things are liable to objection, that this and another thing is of little weight in itself ; but impossible to show, in like manner, the united force of the whole argument in one view." 3 In like manner, Mr. Davison condemns that " vicious manner of reasoning," which represents " any insufficiency of the proof, in its several branches, as so much objection ;" which manages " the inquiry so as to make it appear that, if the divided arguments be inconclusive one by one, we have a series of exceptions to the truths of religion instead of a train of favourable presumptions, growing stronger at every step. The disciple of Scepticism is taught that he cannot fully rely on this or that motive of belief, that each of them is insecure, and the conclusion is put upon him that they ought to be discarded one after another, instead of being connected and combined." 4 No work perhaps affords more specimens in a short compass of the breach of the principle of reasoning inculcated in these passages, than Barrow's Treatise on the Pope's Supremacy. 10. The remarks of these two writers relate to the duty of combining doctrines which belong to one body, and evi- dences which relate to one subject ; and few persons would dispute it in the abstract. The application which has been here made of the principle is this, that where a doctrine comes recommended to us by strong presumptions of its truth, we are bound to receive it unsuspiciously, and use it as a key to the evidences to which it appeals, or the 3 Anal. ii. 7. * On Prophecy, i. p. 28. 1 10 STATE OF TUB EVIDENCE. [CH. III. facts which it professes to systematize, whatever may be our eventual judgment about it. Nor is it enough to answer, that the voice of our particular Church, denying this so- called Catholicism, is an antecedent probability which outweighs all others and claims our prior obedience, loyally and without reasoning, to its own interpretation. This may excuse individuals certainly, in beginning with doubt and distrust of the Catholic developments, but it only shifts the blame to the particular Church, Anglican or other, which thinks itself qualified to enforce so per- emptory a judgment against the one and only successor, heir and representative of the Apostolic college. SECTION n. STATE OP THE EVIDENCE. Bacon is celebrated for destroying the credit of a method of reasoning much resembling that which it has been the object of this Chapter to recommend. " He who is not practised in doubting," he says, " but forward in asserting and laying down such principles as he takes to be approved, granted and manifest, and, according to the established truth thereof, receives or rejects everything, as squaring with or proving contrary to them, is only fitted to mix and confound things with words, reason with madness, and the world with fable and fiction, but not to interpret the works of nature." 6 But he was aiming at the application of these modes of reasoning to what should be strict inves- tigation, and that in the province of physics ; and this he might well censure, without attempting, (what is impos- sible,) to banish them from history, ethics, and religion. 5 Aphor. 6, Ypl. iv. p. xi. ed, 1816, SECT. II.] STATE OP THE EVIDENCE. Ill Physical facts are present ; they are submitted to the senses, and the senses may be satisfactorily tested, corrected, and verified. To trust to anything but sense in a matter of sense is irrational ; why are the senses given us but to supersede less certain, less immediate informants ? We have recourse to reason or authority to determine facts, when the senses fail us ; but with the senses we begin. We deduce, we form inductions, we abstract, we theorize from facts : we do not begin with surmise and conjecture, much less do we look to the tradition of past ages, or the decree of foreign teachers, to determine matters which are in our hands and under our eyes. But it is otherwise with history, the facts of which are not present j it is otherwise with ethics, in which pheno- mena are more subtle, closer, and more personal to indi- viduals than other facts, and not referable to any common standard by which all men can decide upon them. In such sciences, we cannot rest upon mere facts, if we would, because we have not got them. We must do our best with what is given us, and look about for aid from any quarter ; and in such circumstances the opinions of others, the traditions of ages, the prescriptions of authority, antecedent auguries, analogies, parallel cases, these and the like, not indeed taken at random, but, like the evidence from the senses, sifted and scrutinized, obviously become of greut importance. 2. And, further, if we proceed on the hypothesis that a merciful Providence has supplied us with means of gaining such truth as concerns us, in different subject-matters, though with different instruments, then the simple question is, what those instruments are which are proper to a par- ticular case. If they are of the appointment of a Divine Protector, we may be sure that they will lead to the truth, whatever they are. The less exact methods of reasoning 112 STATE OF THE EVIDENCE. [CH. III. may do His work as well as the more perfect, if He blesses them. He may bless antecedent probabilities in ethical inquiries, who blesses experience and induction in the art of medicine. And if it is reasonable to consider medicine, or architec- ture, or engineering, in a certain sense, divine arts, as being divinely ordained means of our receiving divine benefits, much more may ethics be called divine ; while as to religion, it directly professes to be the method of recom- mending ourselves to Him and learning His will. If then it be His gracious purpose that we should learn it, the means He gives for learning it, be they promising or not to human eyes, are sufficient, because they are His. And what they are at this particular time, or to this person, depends on His disposition. He may have imposed simple prayer and obedience on some men as the instrument of their attaining to the mysteries and precepts of Chris- tianity. He may lead others through the written word, at least for some stages of their course ; and if the formal basis on which He has rested His revelations be, as it is, of an historical and philosophical character, then antece- dent probabilities, subsequently corroborated by facts, will be sufficient, as in the parallel case of other history, to bring us safely to the matter, or at least to the organ, of those revelations. 3. Moreover, in subjects which belong to moral proof, such, I mean, as history, antiquities, political science, ethics, metaphysics, and theology, which are pre-eminently such, and especially in theology and ethics, antecedent proba- bility may have a real weight and cogency which it cannot have in experimental science ; and a mature politician or divine may have a power of reaching matters of fact in consequence of his peculiar habits of mind, which is seldom given in the same degree to physical inquirers, who, for SECT. II.] STATE OP THE EVIDENCE. 118 ihe purposes of this particular pursuit, are very much on a level. And this last remark at least is confirmed by Lord Bacon, who confesses " Our method of discovering the sciences does not much depend upon subtlety and strength of genius, but lies level to almost every capacity and understanding ;" 6 though surely sciences there are, in which genius is everything, and rules all but nothing. 4. It will be a great mistake then to suppose .that, because this eminent philosopher condemned presumption and pre- scription in inquiries into facts which are external to us, present with us, and common to us all, therefore authority, tradition, verisimilitude, analogy, and the like, are mere " idols of the den " or " of the theatre " in history or ethics. Here we may oppose to him an author in his own line as great as he is : " Experience," says Bacon, " is by far the best demonstration, provided it dwell in the experiment; for the transferring of it to other things judged alike is very fallacious, unless done with great exactness and regular- ity ." 7 Niebuhr explains or corrects him : " Instances are not arguments," he grants, when investigating an obscure question of Roman history, " instances are not arguments, but in history are scarcely of less force ; above all, where the parallel they exhibit is in the progressive development of institutions." 8 Here this sagacious writer recognizes the true principle of historical logic, while he exemplifies it. The same principle is involved in the well-known maxim of Aristotle, that " it is much the same to admit the pro- babilities of a mathematician, and to look for demonstration from an orator." In all matters of human life, presump- tion verified by instances, is our ordinary instrument of proof, and, if the antecedent probability is great, it ulmost 6 Nov. Org. i. 2, 2ti, vol. iv. p. 29. J Nov. Org. 70, p. 44. e Hist, of Rome, vol. i. p 315, cd. 1828. I U4 StATfe OP THE EVIDENCE. [cH. ttl. supersedes instances. Of course, as is plain, we may err grievously in the antecedent view which we start with, and in that case, our conclusions may be wide of the truth ; but that only shows that we had no right to assume a premiss which was untrustworthy, not that our reasoning was faulty. 5. I am speaking of the process itself, and its correctness is shown by its general adoption. In religious questions a single text of Scripture is all-sufficient with most people, whether the well disposed or the prejudiced, to prove a doctrine or a duty in cases when a custom is established or a tradition is strong. " Not forsaking the assembling of our- selves together " is sufficient for establishing social, public, nav, Sunday worship. "Where the tree falleth, there shall it lie/' shows that our probation ends with life. " For- bidding to marry " determines the Pope to be the man of sin. Again, it is plain that a man's after course for good or bad brings out the passing words or obscure actions of previous years. Then, on a retrospect, we use the event as a presumptive interpretation of the past, of those past indications of his character which, considered as evidence, were too few and doubtful to bear insisting on at the time, and would have seemed ridiculous, had we attempted to do so. And the antecedent probability is even found to triumph over contrary evidence, as well as to sustain what agrees with it. Every one may know of cases in which a plausible charge against an individual was borne down at once by weight of character, though that character was in- commensurate of course with the circumstances which gave rise to suspicion, and had no direct neutralizing force to destroy it. On the other hand, it is sometimes said, and even if not literally true will serve in illustration, that not a few of those who are put on trial in our criminal courts are not legally guilty of the particular crime on which a SECT. JI.] STATE OP TUB EVIDENCE. 115 verdict is found against them, being convicted not so much upon the particular evidence, as on the presumption arising from their want of character and the memory of their former offences. Nor is it in slight matters only or unimportant that we thus act. Our dearest interests, our personal welfare, our property, our health, our reputation, we freely hazard, not on proof, but on a simple probability, which is sufficient for our conviction, because prudence dictates to us so to take it. We must be content to follow the law of our being in religious matters as well as in secular. 6. But there is more to say on the subordinate position which direct evidence holds among the molira of conviction in most matters. It is no paradox to say that there is a certain scantiness, nay an absence of evidence, which may even tell in favour of statements which require to be made good. There are indeed cases in which we cannot discover the law of silence or deficiency, which are then simply unaccountable. Thus Lucian, for whatever reason, hardly notices Roman authors or affairs. 9 Maximus Tyrius, who wrote several of his works at Rome, neverthe- less makes no reference to Roman history. Paterculus, the historian, is mentioned by no ancient writer except Priscian. "What is more to our present purpose, Seneca, Pliny the elder, and Plutarch are altogether silent about Christianity ; and perhaps Epictetus also, and the Em- peror Marcus. The Jewish Mishna, too, compiled about A.D. 180, is silent about Christianity; and the Jerusalem and Babylonish Talmuds almost so, though the one was compiled about A.D. 300, and the other A.D. 500. 1 Eusc- bius again, is very uncertain in his notice of facts : he does not speak of St. Methodius, nor of St. Anthony, nor of the martyrdom of St. Perpetua, nor of the miraculous powers of 9 Lardner's Heatli. Test. p. 22. 1 Paley's Evid. p. i. prop. 1, f. I 2 116 STATE OF TUB EVIDENCE. [CH. III. St. Gregory Thaumaturgus ; and he mentions Constantino's luminous cross, not in his Ecclesiastical History, where it would naturally find a place, but in his Life of the Emperor. Moreover, those who receive that wonderful occurrence, which is, as one who rejects it allows, 8 " so inexplicable to the historical inquirer," have to explain the difficulty of the universal silence on the subject of all the Fathers of the fourth and fifth centuries, excepting Eusebius. In like manner, Scripture has its unexplained omis- sions. No religious school finds its own tenets and usages on the surface of it. The remark applies also to the very context of Scripture, as in the obscurity which hangs over Nathanael or the Magdalen. It is a remarkable circumstance that there is no direct intimation all through Scripture that the Serpent mentioned in the temptation of Eve was the evil spirit, till we come to the vision of the "Woman and Child, and their adversary, the Dragon, in the twelfth chapter of the Apocalypse. 7. Omissions, thus absolute and singular, when they occur in the evidence of facts or doctrines, are of course difficul- ties ; on the other hand, not unfrequently they admit of explanation. Silence may arise from the very notoriety of the facts in question, as in the case of the seasons, the weather, or other natural phenomena ; or from their sacredness, as the Athenians would not mention the mytho- logical Furies; or from external constraint, as the omis- sion of the statues of Brutus and Cassius in the procession. Or it may proceed from fear or disgust, as on the arrival of unwelcome news ; or from indignation, or hatred, or contempt, or perplexity, as Josephus is silent about Chris- tianity, and Eusebius passes over the death of Crispus in his life of Constantino ; or from other strong feeling, &% 4 Milman, Christ, vol. ii. p. 352. SECT. II.] STATE OP THE EVIDENCE. 117 implied in the poet's sentiment, " Give sorrow words ;" or from policy or other prudential motive, or propriety, as Queen's Speeches do not mention individuals, however influential in the political world, and newspapers after a time were silent about the cholera. Or, again, from the natural and gradual course which the fact took, as in the instance of inventions and discoveries, the history of which is on this account often obscure ; or from loss of documents or other direct testimonies, as we should not look for theological information in a treatise on geology. 8. Again, it frequently happens that omissions proceed on some law, as the varying influence of an external cause ; and then, so far from being a perplexity, they may even confirm such evidence as occurs, by becoming, as it were, its correlative. For instance, an obstacle may be assignable, person, or principle, or accident, which ought, if it exists, to reduce or distort the indications of a fact to that ^ery point, or in that very direction, or with the varia- tions, or in the order and succession, which do occur in its actual history. At first sight it might be a suspicious circumstance that but one or two manuscripts of some celebrated document were forthcoming ; but if it were known that the sovereign power had exerted itself to sup- press and destroy it at the time of its publication, and that the extant manuscripts were found just in those places where history witnessed to the failure of the attempt, the coincidence would be highly corroborative of that evidence which alone remained. Thus it is possible to have too much evidence ; that is, evidence so full or exact as to throw suspicion over the case for which it is adduced. The genuine Epistles of St. Ignatius contain none of those ecclesiastical terms, such as " Priest " or " See," which are so frequent afterwards ; 118 STATB OF THE EVIDENCE. [CH. III. and they quote Scripture sparingly. The interpolated Epistles quote it largely ; that is, they are too Scriptural to be Apostolic. Few persons, again, who are acquainted with the primitive theology, but will be sceptical at first reading of the authenticity of such works as the longer Creed of St. Gregory Thaumaturgus, or St. Hippolytus contra Beronem, from the precision of the theological language, which is unsuitable to the Antenicene period. 9. The influence of circumstances upon the expression of opinion or testimony supplies another form of the same law of omission. "I am ready to admit," says Paley, " that the ancient Christian advocates did not insist upon the miracles in argument so frequently as I should have done. It was their lot to contend with notions of magical agency, against which the mere production of the facts was not sufficient for the convincing of their adversaries; I do not know whether they themselves thought it quite decisive of the controversy. But since it is proved, I conceive with certainty, that the sparingness with which they appealed to miracles was owing neither to their ignorance nor their doubt of the facts, it is at any rate an objection, not to the truth of the history, but to the judg- ment of its defenders." 8 And, in like manner, Christians were not likely to entertain the question of the abstract allowableness of images in the Catholic ritual, with the actual superstitions and immoralities of paganism before their eyes. Nor were they likely to determine the place of the Blessed Mary in our reverence, before they had duly secured, in the affections of the faithful, the supreme glory and worship of God Incarnate, her Eternal Lord and Son. Nor would they recognize Purgatory as a part of the Dispensation, till the world had flowed into the 3 Evidences, iii. 5> SECT. II.] STATE OF TOE EVIDENCE. 119 Church, and a habit of corruption had been largely super- induced. Nor could ecclesiastical liberty be asserted, till it had been assailed. Nor would a Pope arise, butin proportion as the Church was consolidated. Nor would monachism be needed, while martyrdoms were in progress. Nor could St. Clement give judgment on the doctrine of Berengarius, nor St. Dionysius refute the Ubiquists, nor St. Irenaeus denounce the Protestant view of Justification, nor St. Cyprian draw up a theory of toleration. There is " a time for every purpose under the heaven ;" " a time to keep silence and a time to speak." 10. Sometimes when the want of evidence for a series of facts or doctrines is unaccountable, an unexpected explana- tion or addition in the course of time is found as regards a portion of them, which suggests a ground of patience as regards the historical obscurity of the rest. Two instances are obvious to mention, of an accidental silence of clear primitive testimony as to important doctrines, and its removal. In the number of the articles of Catholic belief which the Reformation especially resisted, were the Mass and the sacramental virtue of Ecclesiastical Unity. Since the date of that movement, the shorter Epistles of St. Ignatius have been discovered, and the early Liturgies verified ; and this with most men has put an end to the controversy about those doctrines. The good fortune which has happened to them, may happen to others ; and though it does not, yet that it has happened to them, is to those others a sort of compensation for the obscurity in which their early history continues to be Involved. 11. I may seem in these remarks to be preparing the way 120 STATE OP THE EVIDENCE. [CH. III. for a broad admission of the absence of any sanction in primitive Christianity in behalf of its medieval form, but I do not make them with this intention. Not from mis- givings of this kind, but from the claims of a sound logic, I think it right to insist, that, whatever early testimonies I may bring in support of later developments of doctrine, are in great measure brought ex abundante, a matter of grace, not of compulsion. The onus probandi is with those who assail a teaching which is, and has long been, in possession. As for positive evidence in our behalf, they must take what they can get, if they cannot get as much as they might wish, inasmuch as antecedent probabilities, as I have said, go so very far towards dispensing with it. It is a first strong point that, in an idea such as Christianity, develop- ments cannot but be, and those surely divine, because it is divine ; a second that, if so, they are those very ones which exist, because there are no others ; and a third point is the fact that they are found just there, where true develop- ments ought to be found, namely, in the historic seats of Apostolical teaching and in the authoritative homes of im- memorial tradition. 12. And, if it be said in reply that the difficulty of admitting these developments of doctrine lies, not merely in the ab- sence of early testimony for them, but in the actual existence of distinct testimony against them, or, as Chillingworth says, in " Popes against Popes, Councils against Councils," I answer, of course this will be said ; but let the fact of this objection be carefully examined, and its value reduced to its true measure, before it is used in argument. I grant that there are " Bishops against Bishops in Church history, Fathers against Fathers, Fathers against themselves/' for such differences in individual writers are consistent with, or rather are involved in the very idea of doctrinal develop- SECT. II.] STATE OF THE EVIDENCE. 121 ment, and consequently are no real objection to it ; the one essential question is whether the recognized organ of teaching, the Church herself, acting through Pope or Council as the oracle of heaven, has ever contradicted her own enunciations. If so, the hypothesis which I am advocating is at once shattered ; but, till I have positive and distinct evidence of the fact, I am slow to give Credence to the existence of so great an improbability. CHAPTER IV. INSTANCES IN ILLUSTRATION. IT follows now to inquire how much evidence is actually producible for those large portions of the present Creed of Christendom, which have not a recognized place in the primordial idea and the historical outline of the Religion, yet which come to us with certain antecedent considerations strong enough in reason to raise the effectiveness of that evidence to a point disproportionate, as I have allowed, to its intrinsic value. In urging these considerations here, of course I exclude for the time the force of the Church's claim of infallibility in her acts, for which so much can be said, but I do not exclude the logical cogency of those acts, considered as testimonies to the faith of the times before them. My argument then is this : that, from the first age of Christianity, its teaching looked towards those ecclesiastical dogmas, afterwards recognized and defined, with (as time went on) more or less determinate advance in the direction of them ; till at length that advance became so pronounced, as to justify their definition and to bring it about, and to place them in the position of rightful interpretations and keys of the remains and the records in history of the teaching which had so terminated. 2. This line of argument is not unlike that which is considered to constitute a sufficient proof of truths in CH. IV. SECT. I.] INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. 123 physical science. An instance of this is furnished us in a work on Mechanics of the past generation, by a writer of name, and his explanation of it will serve as an introduction to our immediate subject. After treating of the laws of motion, he goes on to observe, "These laws are the simplest principles to which motion can be reduced, and upon them the whole theory depends. They are not indeed self-evident, nor do they admit of accurate proof by experiment, on account of the great nicety required in adjusting the instruments and making the experiments ; and on account of the effects of friction, and the air's resistance, which cannot entirely be removed. They are, however, constantly, and invariably, suggested to our senses, and they agree with experiment as far as experiment can go ; and the more accurately the experiments are made, and the greater care we take to remove all those impedi- ments which tend to render the conclusions erroneous, the more nearly do the experiments coincide with these laws." * And thus a converging evidence in favour of certain doctrines may, under circumstances, be as clear a proof of their Apostolical origin as can be reached practically from the Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus. In such a method of proof there is, first, an imperfect, secondly, a growing evidence, thirdly, in consequence a delayed inference and judgment, fourthly, reason* pro- ducible to account for the delay. SECTION I. INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. 1. (1.) Canon of the New Testament. As regards the New Testament, Catholics and Protestants 1 Wood's Mechanics, p. 31, 124 INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. [CH. IV. receive the came books as canonical and inspired ; yet among those oooks some are to be found, which certainly have no rignt there if, following the rule of Vincentius, we receive nothing as of divine authority but what has been received always and everywhere. The degrees of evidence are very various for one book and another. " It is confessed," says Less, " that not all the Scriptures of our New Testament have been received with universal consent as genuine works of the Evangelists and Apostles. But that man must have predetermined to oppose the most palpable truths, and must reject all history, who will not confess that the greater part of the New Testament has been universally received as authentic, and that the remaining books have been acknowledged as such by the majority of the ancients." 2 2. For instance, as to the Epistle of St. James. It is true, it is contained in the old Syriac version in the second century ; but Origen, in the third century, is the first writer who distinctly mentions it among the Greeks ; and it is not quoted by name by any Latin till the fourth. St. Jerome speaks of its gaining credit ''by degrees, in pro- cess of time." Eusebius says no more than that it had been, up to his time, acknowledged by the majority ; and he classes it with the Shepherd of St. Hermas and the Epistle of St. Barnabas. 3 Again : " The Epistle to the Hebrews, though received in the East, was not received in the Latin Churches till St. Jerome's time. St. Irenams either does not affirm, or denies that it is St. Paul's. Tertullian ascribes it to St. Barnabas. Caius excludes it from his list. St. Hip- polytus docs not receive it. St. Cyprian is silent about it. It is doubtful whether St. Optatus received it." * * Authcut. N. T. Tr. p. 237. 3 According to Less. Tracts for the Tiroes, No. 85, n. 78 ^Discuss, iii. 6, p. 207]. SECT. I.] INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. 125 Again, St. Jerome tells us, that in his day, towards A.I). 400, the Greek Church rejected the Apocalypse, but the Latin received it. Again : " The New Testament consists of twenty-seven books in all, though of varying importance. Of these, fourteen are not mentioned at all till from eighty to one hundred years after St. John's death, in which number are the Acts, the Second to the Corinthians, the Galatians, the Colossians, the Two to the Thessalonians, and St. James. Of the other thirteen, five, viz. St. John's Gospel, the Philippians, the First to Timothy, the Hebrews, and the First of St. John are quoted but by one writer during the same period." 6 3. On what ground, then, do we receive the Canon as it conies to us, but on the authority of the Church of the fourth and fifth centuries ? The Church at that era decided, not merely bore testimony, but passed a judg- ment on former testimony, decided, that certain books were of authority. And on what ground did she so decide ? on the ground that hitherto a decision had been impossible, in an age of persecution, from want of oppor- tunities for research, discussion, and testimony, from the private or the local character of some of the books, and from misapprehension of the doctrine contained in others. Now, however, facilities were at length given for deciding once for all on what had been in suspense and doubt for three centuries. On this subject I will quote another passage from the same Tract : " We depend upon the fourth and fifth centuries thus : As to Scripture, former centuries do not speak distinctly, frequently, or unanimously, except of some chief books, as the Gospels ; but we see in them, as we believe, an ever-growing tendency and approximation * [Ibid. p. 209. These results are taken from Less, and are practically accurate.] 126 INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. [CH. IV. to that full agreement which we find in the fifth. The testimony given at the latter date is the limit to which all that has been before said converges. For instance, it is commonly said, Exccptio probat reyulam ; when we have reason to think that a writer or an age ww/itf have witnessed so and so, but for this or that, and that this or that were mere accidents of his position, then he or it may be said to tend towards such testimony. In this way the first centuries tend towards the fifth. Viewing the matter as one of moral evidence, we seem to see in the testimony of the fifth the very testimony which every preceding century gave, accidents excepted, such as the present loss of docu- ments once extant, or the then existing misconceptions which want of intercourse between the Churches occasioned. The fifth century acts as a comment on the obscure text of the centuries before it, and brings out a meaning, which with the help of the comment any candid person seea really to be theirs " (2.) Original Sin. I have already remarked upon the historical fact, that the recognition of Original Sin, considered as the con- sequence of Adam's fall, was, both as regards general acceptance and accurate understanding, a gradual process, not completed till the time of Augustine and Pelagius. St. Chrysostom lived close up to that date, but there are passages in his works, often quoted, which we should not expect to find worded as they stand, if they had been written fifty years later. It is commonly, and reasonably, said in explanation, that the fatalism, so prevalent in various shapes pagan and heretical, in the first centuries, was an obstacle to an accurate apprehension of the con- sequences of the fall, as the presence of the existing e No. 85 [Discuss, p. 236]. SECT. I.] INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. 127 idolatry was to the use of images. If this be so, we have here an instance of a doctrine held back for a time by circumstances, yet in the event forcing its way into its normal shape, and at length authoritatively fixed in it, that is, of a doctrine held implicitly, then asserting itself, and at length fully developed. 5. (3.) Infant Baptism. One of the passages of St. Chrysostom to which I might refer is this, "We baptize infants, though they are not defiled with sin, that they may receive sanctity, righteousness, adoption, heirship, brotherhood with Christ, and may become His members." (Aug. contr. Jul. i. 21.) This at least shows that he had a clear view of the impor- tance and duty of infant baptism, but such was not the case even with saints in the generation immediately before him. As is well known, it was not unusual in that age of the Church for those, who might be considered catechumens, to delay their baptism, as Protestants now delay reception of the Holy Eucharist. It is difficult for us at this day to enter into the assemblage of motives which led to this postponement ; to a keen sense and awe of the special privileges of baptism which could only once be received, other reasons would be added, reluctance to b.'ing com- mitted to a strict rule of life, and to making a public pro- fession of religion, and to joining in a specially intimate fellowship or solidarity with strangers. But so it was in matter of fact, for reasons good or bad, that infant baptism, which is a fundamental rule of Christian duty with us, was less earnestly insisted on in early times. 6. Even in the fourth century St. Gregory Nazianzen, St. Basil, and St. Augustine, having Christian mothers, 128 INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. [cH. IV. still were not baptized till they were adults. St. Gregory's mother dedicated him to God immediately on his birth ; and again when he had come to years of discretion, with the rite of taking the gospels into his hands by way of consecration. He was religiously-minded from his youth, and had devoted himself to a single life. Yet his baptism did not take place till after he had attended the schools of Cocsarea, Palestine, and Alexandria, and was on his voyage to Athens. He had embarked during the November gales, and for twenty days his life was in danger. He presented himself for baptism as soon as he got to land. St. Basil was the son of Christian confessors on both father's and mother's side. His grandmother Macrina, who brought him up, had for seven years lived with her husband in the woods of Pontus during the Decian perse- cution. His father was said to have wrought miracles i his mother, an orphan of great beauty of person, was forced from her unprotected state to abandon the hope of a single life, and was conspicuous in matrimony for her care of strangers and the poor, and for her offerings to the churches. How religiously she brought up her children is shown by the singular blessing, that four out of ten have since been canonized as Saints. St. Basil was one of these ; yet the child of such parents was not baptized till he had come to man's estate, till, according to the Benedictine Editor, his twenty-first, and perhaps his twenty-ninth, year. St. Augustine's mother, who is her- self a Saint, was a Christian when he was born, though his father was not. Immediately on his birth, he was made a catechumen ; in his childhood he fell ill, and asked for baptism. His mother was alarmed, and was taking measures for his reception into the Church, when he suddenly got better, and it was deferred. He did not receive baptism till the age of thirty-three, after he had been for nine years a victim of Manichceun error. In like SECT. I.] INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. 129 manner, St. Ambrose, though brought up by his mother and holy nuns, one of them his own sister St. Marcellina, was not baptized till he was chosen bishop at the age of about thirty-four, nor his brother St. Satyrus till about the same age, after the serious warning of a shipwreck. St. Jerome too, though educated at Rome, and so far under religious influences, as, with other boys, to be in the observance of Sunday, and of devotions in the catacombs, had no friend to bring him to baptism, till he had reached man's estate and had travelled. 7. Now how are the modern sects, which protest against infant baptism, to be answered by Anglicans with this array of great names in their favour ? By the later rule of the Church surely ; by the dicta of some later Saints, as by St. Chrysostom; by one or two inferences from Scripture ; by an argument founded on the absolute neces- sity of Baptism for salvation, sufficient reasons certainly, but impotent to reverse the fact that neither in Dalmatia nor in Cappadocia, neither in Rome, nor in Africa, was it then imperative on Christian parents, as it is now, to give baptism to their young children. It was on retrospect and after the truths of the Creed had sunk into the Christian mind, that the authority of such men as St. Cyprian, St. Chrysostom, and St. Augustine brought round the orbit terrarum to the conclusion, which the infallible Church confirmed, that observance of the rite was the rule, and the non-observance the exception. 8. (4.) Communion in one kind. In the beginning of the fifteenth century, the Council of Constance pronounced that, " though in the primitive 130 INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. [CH. IV. Church the Sacrament " of the Eucharist " was received by the faithful under each kind, yet the custom has been reasonably introduced, for the avoiding of certain dangers and scandals, that it should be received by the consecrators under each kind, and by the laity only under the kind of Bread ; since it is most firmly to be believed, and in no wise doubted, that the whole Body and Blood of Christ is truly contained as well under the kind of Bread as under the kind of Wine." Now the question is, whether the doctrine here laid down, and carried into effect in the usage here sanctioned, was entertained by the early Church, and may be con- sidered a just development of its principles and practices. I answer that, starting with the presumption that the Council has ecclesiastical authority, which is the point here to be assumed, we shall find quite enough for its defence, and shall be satisfied to decide in the affirmative ; we shall readily come to the conclusion that Communion under either kind is lawful, each kind conveying the full gift of the Sacrament. For instance, Scripture affords us two instances of what may reasonably be considered the administration of the form of Bread without that of Wine; viz. our Lord's own example towards the two disciples at Emmaus, and St. Paul's action at sea during the tempest. Moreover, St. Luke speaks of the first Christians as continuing in the " breaking of bread, and in prayer," and of the first day of the week " when they came together to break bread" And again, in the sixth chapter of St. John, our Lord says absolutely, " He that eateth Me, even he shall live by Me." And, though He distinctly promises that we shall have it granted to us to drink His blood, as well as to eat His flesh ; nevertheless, not a word does He say to signify that, as He is the Bread from heaven and the living Bread, so He is the heavenly, living Wine also. SECT. I.] INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. 131 Again, St. Paul says that " whosoever shall eat this Bread or drink this Cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord." Many of the types of the Holy Eucharist, as far as they go, tend to the same conclusion ; as the Manna, to which our Lord referred, the Paschal Lamb, the Shewbread, the sacrifices from which the blood was poured out, and the miracle of the loaves, which are figures of the bread alone ; while the water from the rock, and the Blood from our Lord's side correspond to the wine without the bread. Others are representations of both kinds ; as Melchizedek's feast, and Elijah's miracle of the meal and oil. 9. And, further, it certainly was the custom in the early Church, under circumstances, to communicate in one kind, as we learn from St. Cyprian, St. Dionysius, St. Basil, St. Jerome, and others. For instance, St. Cyprian speaks of the communion of an infant under Wine, and of a woman under Bread ; and St. Ambrose speaks of his brother in ship- wreck folding the consecrated Bread in a handkerchief, and placing it round his neck ; and the monks and hermits in the desert can hardly be supposed to have been ordinarily in possession of consecrated Wine as well as Bread. From the following Letter of St. Basil, it appears that, not only the monks, but the whole laity of Egypt ordinarily communicated in Bread only. He seems to have been asked by his correspondent, whether in time of persecution it was lawful, in the absence of priest or deacon, to take the communion " in one's own hand," that is, of course, the Bread ; he answers that it may be justified by the follow- ing parallel cases, in mentioning which he is altogether silent about the Cup. " It is plainly no fault," he says, " for long custom supplies instances enough to sanction it. For all the monks in the desert, where there is no priest, K 2 132 INSTANCES CURSORILY NOTICED. [CH. IV. keep the communion at home, and partake it from them- selves. In Alexandria too, and in Egypt, each of the laity, for the most part, has the Communion in his house, and. when he will, he partakes it by means of himself. For when once the priest has celebrated the Sacrifice and given it, he who takes it as a whole together, and then partakes of it daily, reasonably ought to think that he partakes and receives from him who has given it." 7 It should be added, that in the beginning of the Letter he may be interpreted to speak of communion in both kinds, and to say that it is " good and profitable/' Here we have the usage of Pontus, Egypt, Africa, and Milan. Spain may be added, if a late author is right in his view of the meaning of a Spanish Canon ; 8 and Syria, as well as Egypt, at least at a later date, since Nicephorus 9 tells us that the Acephali, having no Bishops, kept the Bread which their last priests had consecrated, and dis- pensed crumbs of it every year at Easter for the purposes of Communion. 10. But it may be said, that after all it is so very hazardous and fearful a measure actually to withdraw 1 Ep. 93. I have thought it best to give an over-literal translation. 8 Vid. ConciL Bracar. ap. Aguirr. Cone. Ilisp. t. ii. p. 676. " That the cup was not administered at the same time is not so clear; but from the tenor of this first Cnnon in the Acts of the Third Council of Braga, which condemns the notion that the Host should be steeped in the chalice, we have no doubt that the wine was withheld from the laity. Whether cer- tain points of doctrine are or are not found in the Scriptures is no concern of the historian ; all that he has to do is religiously to follow his guides, to suppress or distrust nothing through partiality." Dunham, Hist, of Spain and Port. vol. i. p. 204. If pro complemento communionis in the Canon merely means "for the Cup," at least the Cup is spoken of as a complement; the same view is contained in the "confirmation of the Eucharist," as spoken of in St. German's life. Vid. Lives of Saints, No. 9, p. 28. 9 Niceph. Hist, xviii. 45. Renaudot, however, tells us of two Bishops at the time when the schism was at length healed. 1'atr. Al. Jac. p." 2tS. However, these had been consecrated by priests, p. 145. SECT. i.J INSTANCES ctmsoniLY JCOTICED. 133 from ChristiaDS one-half of the Sacrament, that, in spite of these precedents, some direct warrant is needed to reconcile the mind (o it. There might have been circum- stances which led St. Cyprian, or St. Basil, or the Apos- tolical Christians before them to curtail it, about which we know nothing. It is not therefore safe in us, because it was safe in them. Certainly a warrant is necessary ; and just such a warrant is the authority of the Church. If we can trust her implicitly, there is nothing in the state of the evidence to form an objection to her decision in this instance, and in proportion as we find we can trust her does our difficulty lessen. Moreover, children, not to say infants, were at one time admitted to the Eucharist, at least to the Cup ; on what authority are they now excluded from Cup and Bread also ? St. Augustine considered the usage to be of Apostolical origin ; and it continued in the West down to the twelfth century; it continues in the East among Greeks, Russo-Grceks, and the various Monophysite Churches to this day, ' and that on the ground of its almost universality in the primitive Church. 1 Is it a greater innovation to suspend the Cup, than to cut off children from Communion altogether ? Yet we acquiesce in the latter deprivation without a scruple. It is safer to acquiesce with, than without, an authority; safer with the belief that the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth, than with the belief that in so great a matter she is likely to err. 11. (5.) The Homousion. The next instance I shall take is from the early teaching on the subject of our Lord's Consubstantiality and Co- eternity. 1 Vid. Biug. Ant xy. 4, 7 ; and Pleury, Hist. xxvi. 50, note g. 134 flTSTAtiCfeS CtJRSOfelLY NOTICED. [CH. IV. In the controversy carried on by various learned men in the seventeenth and following century, concerning the statements of the early Fathers on this subject, the one party determined the patristic theology by the literal force of the separate expressions or phrases used in it, or by the philosophical opinions of the day ; the other, by the doc- trine of the Catholic Church, as afterwards authoritatively declared. The one party argued that those Fathers need not have meant more than what was afterwards considered heresy ; the other answered that there is nothing to prevent their meaning more. Thus the position which Bull main- tains seems to be nothing beyond this, that the Nicene Creed is a natural key for interpreting the body of Ante- nicene theology. His very aim is to explain difficulties ; now the notion of difficulties and their explanation im- plies a rule to which they are apparent exceptions, and in accordance with which they are to be explained. Nay, the title of his work, which is a " Defence of the Creed of Nicsea/' shows that he is not investigating what is true and what false, but explaining and justifying a foregone con- clusion, as sanctioned by the testimony of the great Coun- cil. Unless the statements of the Fathers had suggested difficulties, his work would have had no object. He allows that their language is not such as they would have used after the Creed had been imposed ; but he says in effect that, if we will but take it in our hands and apply it equitably to their writings, we shall bring out and har- monize their teaching, clear their ambiguities, and discover their anomalous statements to be few and insignificant. In other words, he begins with a presumption, and shows how naturally facts close round it and fall in with it, if we will but let them. He does this triumphantly, yet he has an arduous work ; out of about thirty writers whom he reviews, he has, for one cause or other, to "explain piously " nearly twenty. SECT, ii.] otiE LORD'S INCARNATION, ETC. 135 SECTION II. OUR LORD'S INCARNATION AND THE DIGNITY OF HIS BLESSED MOTHER AND OF ALL SAINTS. Bishop Bull's controversy had regard to Ante-nicene writers only, and to little more than to the doctrine of the Divine Son's consubstantiality and co-eternity; and, as being controversy, it necessarily narrows and dries up a large and fertile subject. Let us see whether, treated historically, it will not present itself to us in various aspects which may rightly be called developments, as coming into view, one out of another, and following one after another by a natural order of succession. 2. First then, that the language of the Ante-nicene Fathers, on the subject of our Lord's Divinity, may be far more easily accommodated to the Arian hypothesis than can the language of the Post-nicene, is agreed on all hands. Thus St. Justin speaks of the Son as subservient to the Father in the creation of the world, as seen by Abraham, as speaking to Moses from the bush, as appearing to Joshua before the fall of Jericho, 2 as Minister and Angel, and as numerically distinct from the Father. Clement, again, speaks of the Word 3 as the " Instrument of God," " close to the Sole Almighty ;" " ministering to the Omnipotent Father's will ;" 4 " an energy, so to say, or operation of the Father," and " constituted by His will as the cause of all good." 8 Again, the Council of Antioch, which condemned Paul of Samosata, says that He " appears to the Patriarchs and converses with them, being testified sometimes to bo an Angel, at other times Lord, at others God ;" that, while " it is impious to think that the God of all is called - Kaye's Justin, p. 59, &c. 8 Kaye's Cleuicut, p. 335. 4 p. 341. * Ib. 342. 136 OUR LORD'S INCARNATION AND -TOE [CH. iv. an Angel, the Son is the Angel of the Father."* Formal proof, however, is unnecessary ; had not the fact been as I have stated it, neither Sandius would have professed to differ from the Post-nicene Fathers, nor would Bull have had to defend the Ante-nicene, 3. One principal change which took place, as time went on, was the following : the Ante-nicene Fathers, as in some of the foregoing extracts, speak of the Angelic visions in the Old Testament as if they were appearances of the Son ; but St. Augustine introduced the explicit doctrine, which has been received since his date, that they were simply Angels, through whom the Omnipresent Son manifested Ilimself. This indeed is the only interpretation which the Ante- nicene statements admitted, as soon as reason began to examine what they did mean. They could not mean that the Eternal God could really be seen by bodily eyes ; if anything was seen, that must have been some created glory or other symbol, by which it pleased the Almighty to signify His Presence. What was heard was a sound, as external to His Essence, and as distinct from His Nature, as the thunder or the voice of the trumpet, which pealed along Mount Sinai; what it was had not come under dis- cussion till St. Augustine ; both question and answer were alike undeveloped. The earlier Fathers spoke as if there were no medium interposed between the Creator and the creature, and so they seemed to make the Eternal Son the medium ; what it really was, they had not deter- mined. St. Augustine ruled, and his ruling has been accepted in later times, that it was not a mere atmospheric phenomenon, or an impression on the senses, but the material form proper to an Angelic presence, or the pre- sence of an Angel in that material garb in which blessed 6 Reliqu. Sacr. t. ii. p. 469, 470. . It.j DIGNITY OF fltS MOTtfEft AN& Att, SAlNTfl. 13 t Spirits do ordinarily appear to men. Henceforth the Angel in the bush, the voice which spoke with Abraham, and the man who wrestled with Jacob, were not regarded as the Son of God, but as Angelic ministers, whom He employed, and through whom He signified His presence and His will. Thus the tendency of the controversy with the Arians was to raise our view of our Lord's Mediatorial acts, to impress them on us in their divine rather than their human aspect, and to associate them more intimately with the ineffable glories which surround the Throne of God. The Mediator- ship was no longer regarded in itself, in that prominently subordinate place which it hadonceoccupied in the thoughts of Christians, but as an office assumed by One, who though having become man in order to bear it, was still God. 7 Works and attributes, which had hitherto been assigned to the Economy or to the Sonship, were now simply assigned to the Manhood. A tendency was also elicited, as the controversy proceeded, to contemplate our Lord more distinctly in His absolute perfections, than in His relation to the First Person of the Blessed Trinity. Thus, whereas the Nicene Creed speaks of the "Father Almighty," and " His Only-begotten Son, our Lord, God from God, Light from Light, Very God from Very God," and of the Holy Ghost, " the Lord and Giver of Life," we are told in the Athanasian of " the Father Eternal, the Son Eternal, and the Holy Ghost Eternal," and that "none is afore or after other, none is greater or less than another." 4. The Apollinarian and Monophysite controversy, which followed in the course of the next century, tended towards a development hi the same direction. Since the heresies, which were in question, maintained, at least virtually, 1 [This subject is more exactly and carefully treated in Tracts Tbeol. and Eccles. pp. 192- 226.] 138 OUR LORD'S INCARNATION AND THE [CH. nr. that our Lord was not man, it was obvious to insist on the passages of Scripture which describe His created and sub- servient nature, and this had the immediate effect of inter- preting of His manhood texts which had hitherto been understood more commonly of His Divine Sonship. Thus, for instance, "My Father is greater than I," which had been understood even by St. Athanasius of our Lord as God, is applied by later writers more commonly to His humanity; and in this way the doctrine of His subordination to the Eternal Father, which formed so prominent a feature in Ante-nicene theology, comparatively fell into the shade. 5. And coincident with these changes, a most remarkable result is discovered. The Catholic polemic, in view of the Arian and Monophysite errors, being of this character, became the natural introduction to the cultus Sanctorum ; for in proportion as texts descriptive of created mediation ceased to belong to our Lord, so was a room opened for created mediators. Nay, as regards the instance of Angelic appearances itself, as St. Augustine explained them, if those appearances were creatures, certainly creatures were worshipped by the Patriarchs, not indeed in themselves, 8 but as the token of a Presence greater than themselves. When " Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look upon God/' he hid his face before a creature ; when Jacob said, " I have seen God face to face and my life is preserved/' the Son of God was there, but what he saw, what he wrestled with, was an Angel. When " Joshua fell on his face to the earth and did worship before the captain of the Lord's host, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant ? " what was seen and heard was a [They also lind a cultvs in themselves, and specially when a greater Presence did not overshadow them. Vtd. Via Media, vol. ii. art. iv. 8, note 1.] SECT. II. J DIGNITY OP HIS MOTHER AND ALL SAlNTB. 139 glorified creature, if St. Augustine is to be followed ; and the Son of God was in him. And there were plain precedents in the Old Testament for the lawfulness of such adoration. When " the people saw the cloudy pillar stand at the tabernacle-door," " all the people rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent- door." 9 When Daniel too saw " a certain man clothed in linen " " there remained no strength " in him, for his " comeliness was turned " in him " into corruption." He fell down on his face, and next remained on his knees and hands, and at length "stood trembling," and said "0 my Lord, by the vision my sorrows are turned upon me, and I have retained no strength. For how can the servant of this my Lord talk with this my Lord ?" 1 It might be objected perhaps to this argument, that a worship which was allowable in an elementary system might be unlawful when " grace and truth " had come " through Jesus Christ ;" but then it might be retorted surely, that that elementary system had been emphatically opposed to all idolatry, and had been minutely jealous of everything which might approach to favouring it. Nay, the very prominence given in the Pentateuch to the doctrine of a Creator, and the comparative silence concerning the An- gelic creation, and the prominence given to the Angelic creation in the later Prophets, taken together, were a token both of that jealousy, and of its cessation, as time went on. Nor can anything be concluded from St. Paul's censure of Angel worship, since the sin which he is denouncing was that of " not holding the Head," and of worshipping crea- tures instead of the Creator as the source of good. The same explanation avails for passages like those in St. Athanasius and Theodoret, in which the worship of Angels is discountenanced. 9 Exod. xxxiii. 10. Dan. x. 517. 146 OUR tOGD^ INCARNATION ANt> THE [CH. IV. 6. The Arian controversy had led to another development, which confirmed by anticipation the cultus to which St. Augustine's doctrine pointed. In answer to the objection urged against our Lord's supreme Divinity from texts which speak of His exaltation, St. Athanasius is led to insist forcibly on the benefits which have accrued to man through it. He says that, in truth, not Christ, but that human nature which He had assumed, was raised and glorified in Him. The more plausible was the heretical argument against His Divinity from those texts, the more emphatic is St. Athanasius's exaltation of our regenerate nature by way of explaining them. But intimate indeed must be the connexion between Christ and His brethren, and high their glory, if the language which seemed to belong to the Incarnate Word really belonged to them. Thus the pressure of the controversy elicited and developed a truth, which till then was held indeed by Christians, but less perfectly realized and not publicly recognized. The sanctificution, or rather the deification of the nature of man, is one main subject of St Athanasius's theology. Christ, in rising, raises His Saints with Him to the right hand of power. They become instinct with His life, of one body with His flesh, divine sons, immortal kings, gods. He is in them, because He is in human nature ; and He communicates to them that nature, deified by becoming His, that them It may deify. He is in them by the Presence of His Spirit, and in them He is seen. They have those titles of honour by participation, which are properly His. Without misgiving we may apply to them the most sacred language of Psalmists and Prophets. " Thou art a Priest for ever " may be said of St. Polycarp or St. Martin as well as of their Lord. "He hath dispersed abroad, he hath given to the poor/' was fulfilled in SECT. II.] DIGNITY OP HIS MOTHER AND ALL BAJNTS. 141 St. Laurence. "I have found David My servant," first said typically of the King of Israel, and belonging really to Christ, is transferred back again by grace to His Vicegerents upon earth. "I have given thee the nations for thine inheritance " is the prerogative of Popes ; " Thou hast given him his heart's desire/' the record of a martyr ; " thou hast loved righteousness and hated iniquity/' the praise of Virgins. 7. "As Christ/' says St. Athanasius, "died, and was exalted as man, so, as man, is He said to take what, as God, He ever had, in order that even this so high a gi ant of grace might reach to us. For the Word did not suffer loss in receiving a body, that He should seek to receive a grace, but rather He deified that which He put on, nay, gave it graciously to the race of man. . . . For it is the Father's glory, that man, made and then lost, should be found again ; and, when done to death, that he should be made alive, and should become God's temple. For whereas the powers in heaven, both Angels and Archangels, were ever worshipping the Lord, as they are now too worshipping Him in the Name of Jesus, this is our grace and high exaltation, that, even when He became man, the Son of God is worshipped, and the heavenly powers are not startled at seeing all of us, who are of one body with Him, introduced into their realms." ; In this passage it is almost said that the glorified Saints will partake in the homage paid by Angels to Christ, the True Object of all worship ; and at least a reason is suggested to us by it for the Angel's shrinking in the Apocalypse from the homage of St. John, the Theologian and Prophet of the Church. 3 But St. Athanasius proceeds still more explicitly, "In that 2 Athan. Orat. i. 42, Oxf. tr. 3 [Ft Calixtus put reason, and Spener the so-called religion of the heart, in the place of dogmatic correctness. Pietism for the time died away; but rationalism developed in Wolf, who professed to prove all the orthodox doctrines, by a process of reasoning, from premisses level with the reason. It was soon found that the instrument which Wolf had used for orthodoxy, could as plausibly be used against it ; in his hands it had proved the Creed ; in the hands of Semler, Ernesti, and others, it disproved the authority of Scripture. What was religion to be made to consist in now ? A sort of philosophical Pietism followed ; or rather Spener's pietism and the original theory of justification were analyzed more thoroughly, and issued in various theories of Pantheism, which from the first was at the bottom of Luther's doctrine and personal character. And this appears to be the state of Lutheranism at present, whether we view it in the philosophy of Kant, in the open infidelity of Strauss, or in the religious professions of the new Evangelical Church of Prussia. Applying this instance to the subject which it has been here brought to illustrate, I should say that the equable and orderly march and natural succession of views, by which the creed of Luther has been changed into the infidel or heretical philosophy of his present representatives, is a proof that s Pusey on German Rationalism, p. 21, note. O 194 FOURTH NOTE. [CH. V. that change is no perversion or corruption, but a faithful development of the original idea. 5. This is but one out of many instances with which the history of the Church supplies us. The fortunes of a theological school are made, in a later generation, the measure of the teaching of its founder. The great Origen after his many labours died in peace ; his immediate pupils were saints and rulers in the Church ; he has the praise of St. Athanasius, St. Basil, and St. Gregory Nazianzen, and furnishes materials to St. Ambrose and St. Hilary ; yet, as time proceeded, a definite heterodoxy was the growing result of his theology, and at length, three hundred years after his death, he was condemned, and, as has generally been considered, in an Ecumenical Council.' " Diodorus of Tarsus," says Tillemont, " died at an advanced age, in the peace of the Church, honoured by the praises of the greatest saints, and crowned with a glory, which, having ever attended him through life, followed him after his death ;" 7 yet St. Cyril of Alexandria considers him and Theodore of Mopsuestia the true authors of Nestorianism, and he was placed in the event by the Nestorians among their saints. Theodore himself was condemned after his death by the same Council which is said to have con- demned Origen, and is justly considered the chief ratio- nalizing doctor of Antiquity ; yet he was in the highest repute in his day, and the Eastern Synod complains, as quoted by Facundus, that u Blessed Theodore, who died so happily, who was so eminent a teacher for five and forty years, and overthrew every heresy, and in his lifetime experienced no imputation from the orthodox, now after 6 Halloix, Valeeius, Lequien, Gieseler, Dollinger, &c., say that he was condemned, not in the fifth Council, but in the Council under Mennas. 7 Mem. Eccl. torn. viii. p. 562. SECT. V.] FIFTH NOTE. 195 his death so long ago, after his many conflicts, after his ten thousand books composed in refutation of errors, after his approval in the sight of priests, emperors, and people, runs the risk of receiving the reward of heretics, and of being called their chief." 8 There is a certain con- tinuous advance and determinate path which belong to the history of a doctrine, policy, or institution, and which impress upon the common sense of mankind, that what it ultimately becomes is the issue of what it was at first. This sentiment is expressed in the proverb, not limited to Latin, Exitus acta probat ; and is sanctioned by Divine wisdom, when, warning us against false prophets, it says, " Ye shall know them by their fruits." A doctrine, then, professed in its mature years by a philosophy or religion, is likely to be a true development, not a corruption, in proportion as it seems to be the logical issue of its original teaching. SECTION V. FIFTH NOTE. ANTICIPATION OF ITS FUTURE. Since, when an idea is living, that is, influential and effective, it is sure to develope according to its own nature, and the tendencies, which are carried out on the long run, may under favourable circumstances show themselves early as well as late, and logic is the same in all ages, instances of a development which is to come, though vague and isolated, may occur from the very first, though a lapse of time be necessary to bring them to perfection. And since developments are in great measure only aspects of the idea from which they proceed, and all of them are natural consequences of it, it is often a matter of accident in what Def . Tr. Cap. viii. init. O 2 196 FIFTH NOTE. [CH. V. order they are carried out in individual minds ; and it is in no wise strange that here and there definite specimens of advanced teaching should very early occur, which in the historical course are not found till a late day. The fact, then, of such early or recurring intimations of tendencies which afterwards are fully realized, is a sort of evidence that those later and more systematic fulfilments are only in accordance with the original idea. 2. Nothing is more common, for instance, than accounts or legends of the anticipations, which great men have given in boyhood of the bent of their minds, as afterwards displayed in their history ; so much so that the popular expectation has sometimes led to the invention of them. The chil'd Cyrus mimics a despot's power, and St. Athanasius is elected Bishop by his playfellows. It is noticeable that in the eleventh century, when the Russians were but pirates upon the Black Sea, Con- stantinople was their aim ; and that a prophesy was in circulation in that city that they should one day gain possession of it. In the reign of James the First, we have an observable anticipation of the system of influence in the management of political parties, which was developed by Sir R. Walpole a century afterwards. This attempt is traced by a living writer to the ingenuity of Lord Bacon. " He submitted to the King that there were expedients for more judiciously managing a House of Commons ; . . that much might be done by forethought towards filling the House with well-affected persons, winning or blinding the lawyers . . and drawing the chief constituent bodies of the assembly, the country gentlemen, the merchants, the courtiers, to act for the King's advantage ; that it would be expedient to tender voluntarily certain graces BtCT. V.] ANTICIPATION OF ITS FUTURE. 197 and modifications of the King's prerogative," &c. 9 The writer adds, " This circumstance, like several others in the present reign, is curious, as it shows the rise of a system- atic parliamentary influence, which was one day to become the mainspring of government." 3. Arcesilas and Carneades, the founders of the later Academy, are known to have innovated on the Platonic doctrine by inculcating a universal scepticism ; and they did this, as if on the authority of Socrates, who had adopted the method of ironia against the Sophists, on their professing to know everything. This, of course, was an insufficient plea. However, could it be shown that Socrates did on one or two occasions evidence deliberate doubts on the great principles of theism or morals, wonld any one deny that the innovation in question had grounds for being considered a true development, not a corruption ? It is certain that, in the idea of Monachism, prevalent in ancient times, manual labour had a more prominent place than study ; so much so that De Ranee, the cele- brated Abbot of La Trappe, in controversy with Mabillon, maintained his ground with great plausibility against the latter's apology for the literary occupations for which the Benedictines of France are so famous. Nor can it be denied that the labours of such as Mabillon and Mont- faucon are at least a development upon the simplicity of the primitive institution. And yet it is remarkable that St. Pachomius, the first author of a monastic rule, enjoined a library in each of his houses, and appointed conferences and disputations three times a week on religious subjects, interpretation of Scripture, or points of theology. St. Basil, the founder of Monachism in Pontus, one of the 9 Hallam'i Coust. Hist ch. vi. p. 4G1. 198 ttFTH NOTE. [CH.V. most learned of the Greek Fathers, wrote his theological treatises in the intervals of agricultural labour. St. Jerome, the author of the Latin versions of Scripture, lived as a poor monk in a cell at Bethlehem. These, indeed, were but exceptions in the character of early Monachism ; but they suggest its capabilities and anticipate its history. Literature is certainly not inconsistent with its idea. In the controversies with the Gnostics, in the second century, striking anticipations occasionally occur, in the works of their Catholic opponents, of the formal dog- matic teaching developed in the Church in the course of the Nestorian and Monophysite controversies in the fifth. On the other hand, Paul of Samosata, one of the first disciples of the Syrian school of theology, taught a heresy sufficiently like Nestorianism, in which that school termi- nated, to be mistaken for it in later times ; yet for a long while after him the characteristic of the school was Arianism, an opposite heresy. Lutheranism has by this time become in most places almost simple heresy or infidelity; it has terminated, if it has even yet reached its limit, in a denial both of the Canon and the Creed, nay, of many principles of morals. Accordingly the question arises, whether these conclusions are in fairness to be connected with its original teaching or are a corruption. And it is no little aid towards its resolution to find that Luther himself at one time rejected the Apocalypse, called theEpistle of St. James " straminea," condemned the word "Trinity," fell into a kind of Eutychianism in his view of the Holy Eucharist, and in a particular case sanctioned bigamy. Calvinism, again, in various distinct countries, has become Socinianism, and Calvin himself seems to have denied our Lord's Eternal Sonship and ridiculed the Nicene Creed. SECT. VI.] SIXTH NOT1. 199 Another evidence, then, of the faithfulness of an ultimate development is its definite anticipation at an early period in the history of the idea to which it belongs. SECTION VI. SIXTH NOTE. CONSERVATIVE ACTION UPON ITS PAST. As developments which are preceded by definite indi- cations have a fair presumption in their favour, so those which do but contradict and reverse the course of doctrine which has been developed before them, and out of which they spring, are certainly corrupt ; for a corruption is a development in that very stage in which it ceases to illus- trate, and begins to disturb, the acquisitions gained in its previous history. It is the rule of creation, or rather of the phenomena which it presents, that life passes on to its termination by a gradual, imperceptible course of change. There is ever a maximum in earthly excellence, and the operation of the same causes which made things great makes them small again. Weakness is but the resulting product of power. Events move in cycles ; all things come round, " the sun ariseth and goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose/' Flowers first bloom, and then fade ; fruit ripens and decays. The fermenting process, unless stopped at the due point, corrupts the liquor which it has created. The grace of spring, the richness of autumn are but for a moment, and worldly moralists bid us Carpe diem, for we shall have no second opportunity. Virtue seems to lie in a mean, between vice and vice ; and as it grew out of imperfection, so to grow into enormity. There is a limit to human knowledge, and both sacred and 200 SIXTH NOTE. [cs. v. profane writers witness that overwisdom is folly. And in the political world states rise and fall, the instruments of their aggrandizement becoming the weapons of their de- struction. And hence the frequent ethical maxims, such as, " Ne quid nimis," "Media tutissimus," "Vaulting am- bition," which seem to imply that too much of what is good is evil. So great a paradox of course cannot be maintained as that truth literally leads to falsehood, or that there can be an excess of virtue ; but the appearance of things and the popular language about them will at least serve us in obtaining an additional test for the discrimination of a bond fide development of an idea from its corruption. A true development, then, may be described as one whicn is conservative of the course of antecedent developments being really those antecedents and something besides them : it is an addition which illustrates, not obscures, corrobo- rates, not corrects, the body of thought from which it proceeds; and this is its characteristic as contrasted with a corruption. 2. i , For instance, a gradual conversion from a false to a true religion, plainly, has much of the character of a continuous process, or a development, in the mind itself, even when the two religions, which are the limits of its course, are antagonists. Now let it be observed, that such a change consists in addition and increase chiefly, not in destruction. " True religion is the summit and perfection of false reli- gions ; it combines in one whatever there is of good and true separately remaining in each. And in like manner the Catholic Creed is for the most part the combination of separate truths, which heretics have divided among them- selves, and err in dividing. So that, in matter of fact, if a religious mind were educated in and sincerely attached fifiCT. VI.] CONSERVATIVE ACTIOtt tlPON ITS t>ASf. 201 to some form of heathenism or heresy, and then were brought under the light of truth, it would be drawn off from error into the truth, not by losing what it had, but by gaining what it had not, not by being unclothed, but by being ' clothed upon/ * that mortality may be swal- lowed up of life/ That same principle of faith which attaches it at first to the wrong doctrine would attach it to the truth ; and that portion of its original doctrine, which was to 1)0 cast off as absolutely false, would not be directly rejected, but indirectly, in the reception of the truth which is its opposite. True conversion is ever of a positive, not a negative character/' l Such too is the theory of the Fathers as regards the doctrines fixed by Councils, as is instanced in the language of St. Leo. " To be seeking for what has been disclosed, to reconsider what has been finished, to tear up what has been laid down, what is this but to be unthankful for what is gained ? " a Viucentius of Lerins, in like manner, speaks of the development of Christian doctrine, as profectus fidei non permutatio^ And so as regards the Jewish Law, our Lord said that He came " not to destroy, but to fulfil." 3. Mahomet is accused of contradicting his earlier revela- tions by his later, " which is a thing so well known to those of his sect that they all acknowledge it ; and therefore when the contradictions are such as they cannot solve them, then they will have one of the contradictory places to be revoked. And they reckon in the whole Alcoran about a hundred and fifty verses which are thus revoked." * Schelling, says Mr. Dewar, considers " that the time has arrived when an esoteric speculative Christianity ought 1 Tracts for the Times, No. 85, p. 73. [Discuss, p. 200 ; vide also Essay on Assent, pp. 249251.] * Ep. 162. Ib. p. 309. * Prideaux, Life of Mahomet, p. 90. 202 SIXTH fcOffi. [CH. V. to take the place of the exoteric empiricism which has hitherto prevailed." This German philosopher " acknow- ledges that such a project is opposed to the evident design of the Church, and of her earliest teachers." 6 4. When Roman Catholics are accused of substituting another Gospel for the primitive Creed, they answer that they hold_, and can show that they hold, the doctrines of the Incarnation and Atonement, as firmly as any Protes- tant can state them. To this it is replied that they do certainly profess them, but that they obscure and virtually annul them by their additions ; that the cultus of St. Mary and the Saints is no development of the truth, but a cor- ruption and a religious mischief to those doctrines of which it is the corruption, because it draws away the mind and heart from Christ. But they answer that, so far from this, it subserves, illustrates, protects the doctrine of our Lord's loving kindness and mediation. Thus the parties in con- troversy join issue on the common ground, that a deve- loped doctrine which reverses the course of development which has preceded it, is no true development but a corruption ; also, that what is corrupt acts as an element of unhealthiness towards what is sound. This subject, however, will come before us in its proper place by and by. 5. Blackstone supplies us with an instance in another sub- ject-matter, of a development which is justified by its utility, when he observes that "when society is once formed * government results of course, as necessary to pre- serve and to keep that society in order." 6 On the contrary, when the Long Parliament proceeded to usurp the executive, they impaired the popular liberties * German Protestantism, p. 176. 6 Vol. L p. 118. SECT. VII.] SEVENTH NOTE. 208 which they seemed to be advancing ; for the security of those liberties depends on the separation of the executive and legislative powers, or on the enactors being subjects, not executors of the laws. And in the history of ancient Rome, from the time that the privileges gained by the tribunes in behalf of the people became an object of ambition to themselves, the development had changed into a corruption. And thus a sixth test of a true development is that it is of a tendency conservative of what has gone before it. SECTION VII. SEVENTH NOTE. CHRONIC VIGOUR. Since the corruption of an idea, as far as the appearance goes, is a sort of accident or affection of its development, being the end of a course, and a transition-state leading to a crisis, it is, as has been observed above, a brief and rapid process. While ideas live in men's minds, they are ever enlarging into fuller development : they will not be stationary in their corruption any more than before it ; and dissolution is that further state to which corruption tends. Corruption cannot, therefore, be of long standing ; and thus duration is another test of a faithful development. Si gravis, brevis ; si longus, levis ; is the Stoical topic of consolation under pain ; and of a number of disorders it can even be said, The worse, the shorter. Sober men are indisposed to change in civil matters, and fear reforms and innovations, lest, if they go a little too far, they should at once run on to some great calamities before a remedy can be applied. The chance of a slow cor- ruption does not strike them. Revolutions are generally 264 SEVENTH NOTE. [OH. V. violent and swift ; now, in fact, they are the course of a corruption. 2. The course of heresies is always short j it is an inter- mediate state between life and death, or what is like death ; or, if it does not result in death, it is resolved into some new, perhaps opposite, course of error, which lays no claim to be connected with it. And in this way indeed, but in this way only, an heretical principle will con- tinue in life many years, first running one way, then another. The abounding of iniquity is the token of the end approaching; the faithful in consequence cry out, How long? as if delay opposed reason as well as patience, Three years and a half are to complete the reign of Anti- christ. Nor is it any real objection that the world is ever cor- rupt, and yet, in spite of this, evil does not fill up its measure and overflow ; for this arises from the external counteractions of truth and virtue, which bear it back ; let the Church be removed, and the world will soon come to its end. And so again, if the chosen people age after age became worse and worse, till there was no recovery, still their course of evil was continually broken by reformations, and was thrown back upon a less advanced stage of declension. 3. It is true that decay, which is one form of corruption, is slow ; but decay is a state in which there is no violent or vigorous action at all, whether of a conservative or a destructive character, the hostile influence being powerful enough to enfeeble the functions of life, but not to quicken SECT. VII.] CHRONIC VIGOUR. 206 its own process. And thus we see opinions, usages, and systems, which are of venerable and imposing aspect, but which have no soundness within them, and keep together from a habit of consistence, or from dependence on poli- tical institutions ; or they become almost peculiarities of a country, or the habits of a race, or the fashions of society. And then, at length, perhaps, they go off suddenly and die out under the first rough influence from without. Such are the superstitions which pervade a population, like some ingrained dye or inveterate odour, and which at length come to an end, because nothing lasts for ever, but which run no course, and have no history ; such was the established paganism of classical times, which was the fit subject of persecution, for its first breath made it crumble and disappear. Such apparently is the state of the Nes- torian and Monophysite communions; such might have been the condition of Christianity had it been absorbed by the feudalism of the middle ages ; such too is that Protes- tantism, or (as it sometimes calls itself) attachment to the Establishment, which is not unfrequently the boast of the respectable and wealthy among ourselves. Whether Mahometanism external to Christendom, and the Greek Church within it, fall under this description is yet to be seen. Circumstances can be imagined which would even now rouse the fanaticism of the Moslem ; and the Russian despotism does not meddle with the usages, though it may domineer over the priesthood, of the national religion. Thus, while a corruption is distinguished from decay by its energetic action, it is distinguished from a development by its transitory character. 4. Such are seven out of various Notes, which may be 206 SEVENTH NOTE. [CH. V. SECT. VII. assigned, of fidelity in the development of an idea. The point to be ascertained is the unity and identity of the idea with itself through all stages of its development from first to last, and these are seven tokens that it may rightly be accounted one and the same all along. To guarantee its own substantial unity, it must be seen to be one in type, one in its system of principles, one in its unitive power to- wards externals, one in its logical consecutiveness, one in the witness of its early phases to its later, one in the pro- tection which its later extend to its earlier, and one in its union of vigour with continuance, that is, in its tenacity. 207 CHAPTER VI. APPLICATION OF THE SEVEN NOTES TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. APPLICATION OF THE FIRST NOTE OF A TRUE DEVELOPMENT. PRESERVATION OF TYPE. Now let me attempt to apply the foregoing seven Notes of fidelity in intellectual developments to the instance of Christian Doctrine. And first as to the Note of identity of type. I have said above, that, whereas all great ideas are found, as time goes on, to involve much which was not seen at first to belong to them, and have developments, that is enlargements, applications, uses and fortunes, very various, one security against error and perversion in theprocess is the maintenance of the original type, which the idea presented to the world at its origin, amid and through all its apparent changes and vicissitudes from first to last. How does this apply to Christianity ? What is its original type ? and has that type been preserved in the develop- ments commonly called Catholic, which have followed, and in the Church which embodies and teaches them ? Let us take it as the world now views it in its nge ; and let us take it as the world once viewed it in its youth , and let us see whether there be any great difference between the early and the later description of it. The following statement will show my meaning : 208 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. There is a religious communion claiming a divine com- mission, and holding all other religious bodies around it heretical or infidel ; it is a well-organized, well-disciplined body; it is a sort of secret society, binding together its members by influences and by engagements which it is difficult for strangers to ascertain. It is spread over the known world ; it may be weak or insignificant locally, but it is strong on the whole from its continuity ; it may be smaller than all other religious bodies together, but is larger than each separately. It is a natural enemy to governments external to itself; it is intolerant and en- grossing, and tends to a new modelling of society; it breaks laws, it divides families. It is a gross superstition ; it is charged with the foulest crimes ; it is despised by the intellect of the day; it is frightful to the imagination of the many. And there is but one communion such. Place this description before Pliny or Julian ; place it before Frederick the Second or Guizot. 1 " Apparent dirse facies." Each knows at once, without asking a question, who is meant by it. One object, and only one, absorbs each item of the detail of the delineation. SECTION I. THE CHURCH OF THE FIRST CENTURIES. The prima facie view of early Christianity, in the eyes of witnesses external to it, is presented to us in the brief but vivid descriptions given by Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny, the only heathen writers who distinctly mention it for the first hundred and fifty years. Tacitus is led to speak of the Religion, on occasion of 1 [This juxtaposition of names has been strangely distorted by critics. In the intention of the author, Guizot matched with Pliny, not with Frederick.] SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 209 the conflagration of Rome, which was popularly imputed to Nero. " To put an end to the report/' he says, " he laid the guilt on others, and visited them with the most exquisite punishment, those, namely, who, held in abhor- rence for their crimes (per flag itia invisos), were popularly called Christians. The author of that profession (nominis) was Christ, who, in the reign of Tiberius, was capitally punished by the Procurator, Pontius Pilate. The deadly superstition (exitiabilis superstitio), though checked for a while, hroke out afresh ; and that, not only throughout Judaea, the original seat of the evil, but through the City also, whither all things atrocious or shocking (atrocia aut pudenda} flow together from every quarter and thrive. At first, certain were seized who avowed it ; then, on their report, a vast multitude were convicted, not so much of firing the City, as of hatred of mankind (odio humani generis)" After describing their tortures, he continues, " In conse- quence, though they were guilty, and deserved most signal punishment, they began to be pitied, as if destroyed not for any public object, but from the barbarity of one man." Suetonius relates the same transactions thus : " Capital punishments were inflicted on the Christians, a class of men of a new and magical superstition (superstitionis norce et maleficw}" What gives additional character to this statement is its context ; for it occurs as one out of various police or sumptuary or domestic regulations, which Nero made; such as "controlling private expenses, forbidding taverns to serve meat, repressing the contests of theatrical parties, and securing the integrity of wills." When Pliny was Governor of Pontus, he wrote his celebrated letter to the Emperor Trajan, to ask advice how he was to deal with the Christians, whom he found there in great numbers. One of his points of hesitation was, whether the very profession of Christianity was not by itself sufficient to justify punishment; "whether the name 210 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. itself should be visited, though cl^ar of flagitious acts (flagitia), or only when connected with them." He says, he had ordered for execution such as persevered in their profession, after repeated warnings, " as not doubting, what- ever it was they professed, that at any rate contumacy and inflexible obstinacy ought to be punished/' He required them to invoke the gods, to sacrifice wine and frankincense to the images of the Emperor, and to blaspheme Christ ; " to which," he adds, " it is said no real Christian can be compelled." Renegades informed him that "the sum total of their offence or fault was meeting before light on an appointed day, and saying with one another a form of words (carmen) to Christ, as if to a god, and binding them- selves by oath, (not to the commission of any wickedness, but) against the commission of theft, robbery, adultery, breach of trust, denial of deposits ; that, after this they were accustomed to separate, and then to meet again for a meal, but eaten all together and harmless ; however, that they had even left this off after his edicts enforcing the Imperial prohibition of Hetcerice or Associations." He proceeded to put two women to the torture, but " discovered nothing beyond a bad and excessive superstition " (super- stitionem pravam et immodicam), " the contagion " of which, lie continues, " had spread through villages and country, till the temples were emptied of worshippers." o 2. 1-1 In these testimonies, which will form a natural and convenient text for what is to follow, we have various characteristics brought before us of the religion to which they relate. It was a superstition, as all three writers agree ; a bad and excessive superstition, according to Pliny ; a magical superstition, according to Suetonius ; a deadly superstition, according to Tacitus. Next, it was embodied in a society, and moreover a secret and unlawful SECT. I.] THfi FIRST CENTUfclES. 2ll society or hetaria ; and it was a proselytizing society ; and its very name was connected with " flagitious," "atrocious," and " shocking " acts. 3. Now these few points, which are not all which might be set down, contain in themselves a distinct and significant description of Christianity ; but they have far greater meaning when illustrated by the history of the times, the testimony of later writers, and the acts of the Roman government towards its professors. It is impossible to mistake the judgment passed on the religion by these three writers, and still more clearly by other writers and Impe- rial functionaries. They evidently associated Christianity with the oriental superstitions, whether propagated by individuals or embodied in a rite, which were in that day traversing the Empire, and which in the event acted so remarkable a part in breaking up the national forms of worship, and so in preparing the way for Christianity. This, then, is the broad view which the educated heathen took of Christianity ; and, if it had been very unlike those rites and curious arts in external appearance, they would not have confused it with them. Changes in society are, by a providential appointment, commonly preceded and facilitated by the setting in of a certain current in men's thoughts and feelings in that direction towards which a change is to be made. And, as lighter substances whirl about before the tempest and presage it, so words and deeds, ominous but not effective of the coming revolution, are circulated beforehand through the multitude, or pass across the field of events. This was specially the case with Christianity, as became its high dignity; it came heralded and attended by a crowd of shadows, shadows of itself, impotent and monstrous as shadows are but not at first sight distinguishable from it p2 212 THE cnuRcn OP [CH. vi. by common spectators. Before the mission of the Apostles, a movement, of which there had been earlier parallels, had begun in Egypt, Syria, and the neighbouring countries, tending to the propagation of new and peculiar forms of worship throughout the Empire. Prophecies were afloat that some new order of things was coming in from the East, which increased the existing unsettlement of the popular mind ; pretenders made attempts to satisfy its wants, and old Traditions of the Truth, embodied for ages in local or in national religions, gave to these attempts a doctrinal and ritual shape, which became an additional point of resemblance to that Truth which was soon visibly to appear. 4. The distinctive character of the rites in question lay in their appealing to the gloomy rather than to the cheerful and hopeful feelings, and in their influencing the mind through fear. The notions of guilt and expiation, of evil and good to come, and of dealings with the invisible world, were iu some shape or other pre-eminent in them, and formed a striking contrast to the classical polytheism, which was gay and graceful, as was natural in a civilized age. The new rites, on the other hand, were secret ; their doctrine was mysterious; their profession was a discipline, beginning in a formal initiation, manifested in an association, and exer- cised in privation and pain. They were from the nature of the case proselytizing societies, for they were rising into power ; nor were they local, but vagrant, restless, intru- sive, and encroaching. Their pretensions to supernatural knowledge brought them into easy connexion with magic and astrology, which are as attractive to the wealthy and luxurious as the more vulgar superstitious to the populace. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 218 5. Such were the rites of Cybele, Isis, and Mithras ; such the Chaldeans, as they were commonly called, and the Magi ; they came from one part of the world, and during the first and second century spread with busy perseverance to the northern and western extremities of the empire. 1 Traces of the mysteries of Cybele, a Syrian deit} r , if the famous temple at Hicrapolis was hers, have been found in Spain, in Gaul, and in Britain, as high wp as the wall of Severus. The worship of Isis was the most widely spread of all the pagan deities ; it was received in Ethiopia and in Germany, and even the name of Paris has been fanci- fully traced to it. Both worships, as well as the Science of Magic, had their colleges of priests and devotees, which were governed by a president, and in some places were supported by farms. Their processions passed from town to town, begging as they went and attracting proselytes. Apuleius describes one of them as seizing a whip, accusing himself of some offence, and scourging himself in public. These strollers, circulatorcs or agyrta in classical language, told fortunes, and distributed prophetical tickets to the ignorant people who consulted them. Also, they were learned in the doctrine of omens, of luck) 7 and unlucky days, of the rites of expiation and of sacrifices. Such an ayyrles or itinerant was the notorious Alexander of Abo- notiehus, till he managed to establish himself in Pontus, where he carried on so successful an imposition that his fame reached Rome, and men in office and station entrusted him with their dearest political secrets. Such a wanderer, with a far more religious bearing and a high reputation for virtue, was Apollonius of Tyana, who professed the Pytha- 2 Vid. Muller de Hierarch. et Ascetic. Warburton, Div. Leg ii. 4. Selder de Diis Syr. Acad. des luscript. t. 3, hist. p. 296, t. 5, mem. p. 63, t 10, mem. p. 267. Lucian. Pseucjomant, Cod. Theod. ix. 16, 214 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. gorean philosophy, claimed the gift of miracles, and roamed about preaching, teaching, healing, and prophesy- ing from India and Alexandria to Athens and Rome. Another solitary proselytizer, though of an earlier time and of an avowed profligacy, had been the Sacrificulus, viewed with such horror by the Roman Senate, as intro- ducing the infamous Bacchic rites into Rome. Such, again, were those degenerate children of a divine religion, who, in the words of their Creator and Judge, " compassed sea and land to make one proselyte," and made him " twofold more the child of hell than themselves." 6. These vagrant religionists for the most part professed a severe rule of life, and sometimes one of fanatical mortifi- cation. In the mysteries of Mithras, the initiation 8 was preceded by fasting and abstinence, and a variety of pain- ful trials ; it was made by means of a baptism as a spiritual washing ; and it included an offering of bread, and some emblem of a resurrection. In the Samothracian rites it had been a custom to initiate children ; confession too of greater crimes seems to have been required, and would naturally be involved in others in the inquisition prosecuted into the past lives of the candidates for initiation. The garments of the converts were white ; their calling was considered as a warfare (militia) , and was undertaken with a sacramentum, or military oath. The priests shaved their heads and wore linen, and when they were dead were buried in a sacerdotal garment. It is scarcely necessary to refer to the mutilation inflicted on the priests of Cybele ; one instance of their scourgingshas been already mentioned; and Tertullian speaks of their high priest cutting his arms 3 Acad. 1. 16. mem. p. 27 SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 216 for the life of the Emperor Marcus. 4 The priests of Isis, in lamentation for Osiris, tore their breasts with pine coned. This lamentation was a ritual observance, founded on sonve religious mystery : Isis lost Osiris, and the initiated wept in memory of her sorrow ; the Syrian goddess had wept over dead Thammuz, and her mystics commemorated it by a ceremonial woe ; in the rites of Bacchus, an image wafs laid on a bier at midnight, 8 which was bewailed in metrical hymns ; the god was supposed to die, and then to revive. Nor was this the only worship which was con- tinued through the night ; while some of the rites were performed in caves. Only a heavenly light can give purity to nocturnal and subterraneous worship. Caves were at that tinie appropriated to the worship of the infernal gods. It was but natural that these wild religions should be connected with magic and its kindred arts ; magic has at all times led to cruelty, and licentiousness would be the inevitable reaction from a temporary strictness. An extraordinary profession, when men are in a state of mere nature, makes hypocrites or madmen, and will in no long time be discarded except by the few. The world of that day associated together in one company, Isiac, Phrygian, Mithriac, Chaldean, wizard, astrologer, fortune-teller, itinerant, an'd, as was not unnatural, Jew. Magic was professed by the profligate Alexander, and was imputed to the grave Apol- lonius. The rites of Mithras came from the Magi of Persia ; and it is obviously difficult to distinguish in principle the ceremonies of the Syrian Taurobolium from those of tke Necyomantia in the Odyssey, or of Canidia in Horace. 4 Apol. 25. Vid. also Prudent, in hon. Komani, circ. fin. and Luciuu de Deo Syr. 50. s Vid, also the scene in Jul. Firm. n. 44$, 216 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. The Theodosian Code calls magic generally a " supersti- tion ;" and magic, orgies, mysteries, and " sabbathizings," were referred to the same " barbarous " origin. " Magical superstitions,'* the " rites of the Magi," the " promises of the Chaldeans/' and the " Mathematici," are familiar to the readers of Tacitus. The Emperor Otho, an avowed patron of oriental fashions, took part in the rites of Isis, and consulted the Mathematici. Vespasian, who also con- sulted them, is heard of in Egypt as performing miracles at the suggestion of Serapis. Tiberius, in an edict, classes together " Egyptian and Jewish rites ;" and Tacitus and Suetonius, in recording it, speak of the two religions to- gether as " ea supers? itto." 6 Augustus had already associ- ated them together as superstitions, and as unlawful, and that in contrast to others of a like foreign origin. "As to foreign rites (peregrina ceremonies)" says Suetonius, " as he paid more reverence to those which were old and enjoined, so did he hold the rest in contempt." 7 He goes on to say that, even on the judgment-seat, he had recognized the Eleusinian priests, into whose mysteries he had been initi- ated at Athens ; " whereas, when travelling in Egypt, he had refused to see Apis, and had approved of his grandson Caligula's passing by Judaea without sacrificing at Jeru- salem." Plutarch speaks of magic as connected with the mournful mysteries of Orpheus and Zoroaster, with the Egyptian and the Phrygian; and, in his Treatise on Superstition, he puts together in one clause, as specimens of that disease of mind, "covering oneself with mud, wallowing in the mire, sabbathizings, fallings on the face, unseemly pastures, foreign adorations." 8 Ovid mentions in consecutive verses the rites of "Adonis lamented by Venus," "The Sabbath of the Syrian Jew," and the " Memphitic Temple of lo in her linen dress." ' Juvenal 6 Tac. Ann. ii. 85 ; Sueton. Tiber. 36. 7 August. 93. 8 De Superst. 3. 9 Pe Art. Am. i. init. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 217 speaks of the rites, as well as the language and the music, of the Syrian Orontes having flooded Rome ; and, in his description of the superstition of the Roman women, he places the low Jewish fortune-teller between the pompous priests of Cybele and Isis, and the bloody witchcraft of the Armenian haruspex and the astrology of the Chaldeans. 1 8. The Christian, being at first accounted a kind of Jew, was even on that score included in whatever odium, and whatever bad associations, attended on the Jewish name. But in a little time his independence of the rejected people was clearly understood, as even the persecutions show ; and he stood upon his own ground. Still his character did not change in the eyes of the world ; for favour or for reproach, he was still associated with the votaries of secret and magi- cal rites. The Emperor Hadrian, noted as he is for his inquisitive temper, and a partaker in so many mysteries, 3 still believed that the Christians of Egypt allowed them- selves in the worship of Serapis. They are brought into connexion with the magic of Egypt in the history of what is commonly called the Thundering Legion, so far as this, that the rain which relieved the Emperor's army in the field, and which the Church ascribed to the prayers of the Christian soldiers, is by Dio Cassius attributed to an Egyptian magician, who obtained it by invoking Mercury and other spirits. This war had been the occasion of one of the first recognitions which the state had conceded to the Oriental rites, though statesmen and emperors, as private men, had long taken part in them. The Emperor Marcus had been urged by his fears of the Marcomanni to resort to these foreign introductions, and is said to have employed Magi and Chaldeans in averting an unsuccessful i Sat. iii. vv * Tertql. Ap. 5. 218 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. issue of the war. It is observable that, in the growing countenance which was extended to these rites in the third century, Christianity came in for a share. The chapel of Alexander Severus contained statues of Abraham, Orpheus, Apollonius, Pythagoras, and our Lord. Here indeed, as in the case of Zenobia's Judaism, an eclectic philosophy aided the comprehension of religions. But, immediately before Alexander, Heliogabalus, who was no philosopher, while he formally seated his Syrian idol in the Palatine, while he observed the mysteries of Cybele and Adonis, and celebrated his magic rites with human victims, intended also, according to Lampridius, to unite with his horrible superstition " the Jewish and Samaritan religions and the Christian rite, that so the priesthood of Heliogabalus might comprise the mystery of every worship." 8 Hence, more or less, the stories which occur in ecclesiastical history of the conversion or good-will of the emperors to the Christian faith, of Hadrian, Mamraaea, and others, besides Heliogabalus and Alexander. Such stories might often mean little more than that they favoured it among other forms of Oriental superstition. 9. What has been said is sufficient to bring before the mind an historical fact, which indeed does not need evidence. Upon the established religions of Europe the East had renewed her encroachments, and was pouring forth a family of rites which in various ways attracted the attention of the luxurious, the political, the ignorant, the restless, and the remorseful. Armenian, Chaldee. Egyp- tian, Jew, Syrian, Phrygian, as the case might be, was the designation of the new hierophant; and magic, superstition, barbarism, jugglery, were the names given to his rite by the world. In this company appeared Vit. Hel. 3. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 219 Christianity. When then three well-informed writers call Christianity a superstition and a magical superstition, they were not using words at random, or the language of abuse, but they were describing it in distinct and recog- nized terms as cognate to those gloomy, secret, odious, disreputable religions which were making so much dis- turbance up and down the empire. 10. The impression made on the world by circumstances immediately before the rise of Christianity received a sort of confirmation upon its rise, in the appearance of the Gnostic and kindred heresies, which issued from the Church during the second and third centuries. Their resemblance in ritual and constitution to the Oriental religions, sometimes their historical relationship, is undeniable; and certainly it is a singular coincidence, that Christianity should be first called a magical superstition by Suetonius, and then should be found in the intimate company, and seemingly the parent, of a multitude of magical superstitions, if there was nothing in the Religion itself to give rise to such a charge. 11. The Gnostic family 4 suitably traces its origin to a mixed race, which had commenced its national history by associat- ing Orientalism with Revelation. After the captivity of the ten tribes, Samaria was colonized by " men from Babylon and Cushan, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim," who were instructed at their own instance in " the manner of the God of the land," by one of the priests of the Church of Jeroboam. The consequence was, that " they feared the Lord and served their own * Vid. Tillemont, Mem. and Lardner's Hist. Heretics. 220 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. gods." Of this country was Simon, the reputed patriarch of the Gnostics; and he is introduced in the Acts of the Apostles as professing those magical powers which were so principal a characteristic of the Oriental mysteries. His heresy, though broken into a multitude of sects, was poured over the world with a Catholicity not inferior in its day to that of Christianity. St. Peter, who fell in with him originally in Samaria, seems to have encountered him again at Rome. At Rome, St. Potycarp met Marcion of Pontus, whose followers spread through Italy, Egypt, Syria, Arabia, and Persia ; Valentiuus preached his doctrines in Alexandria, Rome, and Cyprus ; and we read of his disciples in Crete, Crcsarea, Antioch, and other parts of the East. Bardesanes and his followers were found in Mesopotamia. The Carpocratians are spoken of at Alexan- dria, at Rome, and in Cephallenia ; the Basilidians spread through the greater part of Egypt; the Ophites were apparently in Bithynia and Galatia; the Cainites or Caians in Africa, and the Marcosians in Gaul. To these must be added several sects, which, though not strictly of the Gnostic stock, are associated with them in date, character, and origin ; the Ebionites of Palestine, the Cerinthians, who rose in some part of Asia Minor, the Encratites and kindred sects, who spread from Mesopotamia to Syria, to Cilicia and other provinces of Asia Minor, and thence to Rome, Gaul, Aquitaine, and Spain ; and the Montanists, who, with a town in Phrygia for their metropolis, reached at length from Constantinople to Carthage. "When [the reader of Christian history] comes to the second century," says Dr. Burton, "he finds that Gnosti- cism, under some form or other, was professed in every part of the then civilized world. He finds it divided into schools, as numerously and as zealously attended as any which Greece or Asia could boast in their happiest days. SECT. I.] THE FIUST CENTUIMES. 221 He meets with names totally unknown to him before, which excited as much sensation as those of Aristotle or Plato. He hears of volumes having been written in support of this new philosophy, not one of which has survived to our own day." 6 Many of the founders of these sects had been Christians ; others were of Jewish parentage ; others were more or less connected in fact with the Pagan rites to which their own bore so great a resemblance. Montanus seems even to have been a mutilated priest of Gybele ; the followers of Prodicus professed to possess the secret books of Zoroaster ; and the doctrine of dualism, which &o many of the sects held, is to be traced to the same source. Basilides seems to have recognized Mithras as the Supreme Being, or the Prince of Angels, or the Sun, if Mithras is equivalent to Abraxas, which was inscribed upon his amulets : on the other hand, he is said to have been taught by an immediate disciple of St. Peter, and Valen- tinus by an immediate disciple of St. Paul. Marcion wag the son of a Bishop of Pontus ; Tatian, a disciple of St. Justin Martyr. 12. Whatever might be the history of these sects, and though it may be a question whether they can be properly called " superstitions," and though many of them numbered educated men among their teachers and followers, they closely resembled, at least in ritual and profession, the vagrant Pagan mysteries which have been above described. Their very name of " Gnostic " implied the possession of a secret, which was to be communicated to their disciples. Ceremonial observances were the preparation, and sym- bolical rites the instrument, of initiation. Tatian and Montanus, the representatives of very distinct schools, agreed in making asceticism a rule of life. The followers 5 Bampton Lect. 2. 222 THE CHURCH OF [en. vi. of each of these sectaries abstained from wine j the Tatianites and Marcionites, from flesh ; the Montanists kept three Lents in the year. All the Gnostic sects seem to have condemned marriage on one or other reason. 6 The Marcionites had three baptisms or more; the Marcosians had two rites of what they called redemp- tion ; the latter of these was celebrated as a marriage, and the room adorned as a marriage-chamber. A con- secration to a priesthood then followed with anointing. An extreme unction was another of their rites, and prayers for the dead one of their observances. Barde- sanes and Harmonius were famous for the beauty of their chants. The prophecies of Montanus were delivered, like the oracles of the heathen, in a state of enthusiasm or ecstasy. To Epiphanes, the son of Carpocrates, who died at the age of seventeen, a temple was erected in the island of Cephallenia, his mother's birthplace, where he was celebrated with hymns and sacrifices. A similar honour was paid by the Carpocratians to Homer, Pytha- goras, Plato, Aristotle, as well as to the Apostles ; crowns were placed upon their images, and incense burned before them. In one of the inscriptions found at Gyrene, about twenty years since, Zoroaster, Pythagoras, Epicurus, and others, are put together with our Lord, as guides of con- duct. These inscriptions also contain the Carpocratian tenet of a community of women. I am unwilling to allude to the Agapae and Communions of certain of these sects, which were not surpassed in profligacy by the Pagan rites of which they were an imitation. The very name of Gnostic became an expression for the worst impurities, and no one dared eat bread with them, or use their culinary instruments or plates. 6 Burtou, Banipton Lect. note 61 SECT. I.] THE PIE8T CENTURIES. 223 13. These profligate excesses are found in connexion with the exercise of magic and astrology. 7 The amulets of the Basilidians are still extant in great numbers, inscribed with symbols, some Christian, some with figures of Isis, Serapis, and Anubis, represented according to the gross indecencies of the Egyptian mythology. 8 St. Irenaeus had already connected together the two crimes in speak- ing of the Simonians : " Their mystical priests/' he says, " live in lewdness, and practise magic, according to the ability of each. They use exorcisms and incantations ; love-potions too, and seductive spells ; the virtue of spirits, and dreams, and all other curious arts, they diligently observe." 9 The Marcosians were especially devoted to these " curious arts," which are also ascribed to Carpocrates and Apelles. Marcion and others are reported to have used astrology. Tertullian speaks generally of the sects of his day : " Infamous are the dealings of the heretics with sorcerers very many, with mountebanks, with astrologers, with philosophers, to wit, such as are given to curious questions. They everywhere remember, ' Seek, and ye shall find.' " l Such were the Gnostics ; and to external and prejudiced spectators, whether philosophers, as Celsus and Porphyry, or the multitude, they wore an appearance sufficiently like the Church to be mistaken for her in the latter part of the Ante-nicene period, as she was confused with the Pagan mysteries in the earlier. 14 Of course it may happen that the common estimate concerning a person or a body is purely accidental and 7 Burton, Bam p ton Lect. note 44. 8 Montfaucon, Antiq. t. ii. part 2, p. 353. Hser. i. 20. De Prsescr. 43. 224 THE CHURCH OP [en. VI. unfounded; but in such cases it is not lasting. Such were the calumnies of child-eating and impurity in the Christian meetings, which were almost extinct by the time of Origen, and which might arise from the world's contusing them with the pagan and heretical rites. But when it continues from age to age, it is certainly an index of a fact, and corresponds to definite qualities in the object to which it relates. In that case, even mistakes carry information ; for they are cognate to the truth, and we can allow for them. Often what seems like a mistake is merely the mode in which the informant conveys his testimony, or the impression which a fact makes on him. Censure is the natural tone of one man in a case where praise is the natural tone of another ; the very same character or action inspires one mind with enthusinsm, and another with contempt. What to one man is mag- nanimity, to another is romance, and pride to a third, and pretence to a fourth, while to a fifth it is simply unin- telligible ; and yet there is a certain analogy in their separate testimonies, which conveys to us what the thing is like and what it is not like. When a man's acknow- ledged note is superstition, we may be pretty sure we shall not find him an Academic or an Epicurean ; and even words which are ambiguous, as " atheist," or " re- former," admit of a sure interpretation when we are informed of the speaker. In like manner, there is a certain general correspondence between magic and miracle, obstinacy and faith, insubordination and zeal for religion, sophistry and argumentative talent, craft and meekness, as is obvious. Let us proceed then in our contemplation of this reflection, as it may be called of primitive Chris- tianity in the mirror of the world. 15. All three writers, Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny, call it SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 225 a "superstition;" this is no accidental imputation, but is repeated by a variety of subsequent writers and speakers. The charge of Thyestean banquets scarcely lasts a hundred years; but, while pagan witnesses are to be found, the Church is accused of superstition. The heathen disputant in Minucius calls Christianity, " Vana et demens superstitio" The lawyer Modestinus speaks, with an apparent allusion to Christianity, of " weak minds being terrified supersiitione numinis" The heathen magistrate asks St. Marcellus, whether he and others have put away "vain superstitions/' and worship the gods whom the emperors worship. The Pagans in Arno- bius speak of Christianity as " an execrable and unlucky religion, full of impiety and sacrilege, contaminating the rites instituted from of old with the superstition of its novelty." The anonymous opponent of Lactantius calls it, " Impia et anilis superstitio." Diocletian's inscription at Clunia was, as it declared, on occasion of " the total extinction of the superstition of the -Christians, and the extension of the worship of the gods." Maximin, in his Letter upon Constantino's Edict, still calls it a supersti- tion. 1 16. Now what is meant by the word thus attached by a consensus of heathen authorities to Christianity P At least, it cannot mean a religion in which a man might think what he pleased, and was set free from all yokes, whether of ignorance, fear, authority, or priestcraft. When heathen writers call the Oriental rites superstitions, they evidently use the word in its modern sense ; it cannot surely be doubted that they apply it in the same sense to Chris- tianity. But Plutarch explains for us the word at length, 2 Vid. Kortholt, in Plin. et Traj. Epp. p. 152. Comment, in Minno. F.&c, 226 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. in his Treatise which bears the name: "Of all kinds of fear," he says, "superstition is the most fatal to action and resource. He does not fear the sea who does not sail, nor war who does not serve, nor robbers who keeps at home, nor the sycophant who is poor, nor the envious if he is a private man, nor an earthquake if he lives in Gaul, nor thunder if he lives in Ethiopia ; but he who fears the gods fears everything, earth, seas, air, sky, darkness, light, noises, silence, sleep. Slaves sleep and forget their masters; of the fettered doth sleep lighten the chain; inflamed wounds, ulcers cruel and agonizing, are not felt by the sleeping. Superstition alone has come to no terms with sleep ; but in the very sleep of her victims, as though they were in the realms of the impious, she raises horrible spectres, and monstrous phantoms, and various pains, and whirls the miserable soul about, and persecutes it They rise, and, instead of making light of what is unreal, they fall into the hands of quacks and conjurers, who say, * Call the crone to expiate, bathe in the sea, and sit all day on the ground.' " He goes on to speak of the introduction of " uncouth names and barbarous terms " into " the divine and national authority of religion ;" observes that, whereas slaves, when they despair of freedom, may demand to be sold to another master, superstition admits of no change of gods, since " the god cannot be found whom he will not fear, who fears the gods of his family and his birth, who shudders at the Saving and the Benignant, who has a trembling and dread at those from whom we ask riches and wealth, concord, peace, success of all good words and deeds." He says, moreover, that, while death is to all men an end of life, it is not so to the superstitious ; for then ' there are deep gates of hell to yawn, and headlong streams of at once fire and gloom are opened, and darkness with its many phantoms encompasses, ghosts presenting horrid visages and wretched voices, and judges and SECT. L] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 227 executioners, and chasms and dens full of innumerable miseries." Presently, he says, that in misfortune or sickness the superstitious man refuses to see physician or philosopher, and cries, " Suffer me, O man, to undergo punishment, the impious, the cursed, the hated of gods and spirits. The Atheist," with whom all along he is contrasting the super- stitious disadvantageously, " wipes his tears, trims his hair, doffs his mourning ; but how can you address, how help the superstitious? He sits apart in sackcloth or filthy rags ; and often he strips himself and rolls in the mud, and tells out his sins and offences, as having eaten and drunken something, or walked some way which the divinity did not allow. . . . And in his best mood, and under the influence of a good-humoured supersition, he sits at home, with sacrifice and slaughter all round him, while the old crones hang on him as on a peg, as Bion says, any charm they fall in with/' He continues, "What men like best are festivals, banquets at the temples, initiations, orgies, votive prayers, and adorations. But the superstitious wishes indeed, but is unable to rejoice. He is crowned and turns pale ; he sacrifices and is in fear ; be prays with a quivering voice, and burns incense with trembling hands, and altogether belies the saying of Pythagoras, that we are then in best case when we go to the gods ; for superstitious men are in most wretched and evil case, approaching the houses or shrines of the gods as if they were the dens of bears, or the holes of snakes, or the caves of whales." 17. Here we have a vivid picture of Plutarch's idea of the essence of Superstition ; it was the imagination of the existence of an unseen ever-present Master ; the bondage o.f a rule of life, of a continual responsibility ; obligation 228 THB CHURCH OP [CH. VI. to attend to little things, the impossibility of escaping from duty, the inability to choose or change one's religion, an interference with the enjoyment of life, a melancholy view of the world, sense of sin, horror at guilt, appre- hension of punishment, dread, self-abasement, depression, anxiety and endeavour to be at peace with heaven, and error and absurdity in the methods chosen for the purpose. Such too had been the idea of the Epicurean Velleius, when he shrunk with horror from the " sempiternus dominus" and " curiosus Deus" of the Stoics. 3 Such, surely, was the meaning of Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny. And hence of course the frequent reproach cast on Christians as credulous, weak-minded, and poor-spirited. The heathen objectors in Minucius and Lactantius speak of their " old- woman's tales." 4 Celsus accuses them of " assenting at random and without reason," saying, " Do not inquire, but believe." " They lay it down," he says elsewhere, " Let no educated man approach, no man of wisdom, no man of sense ; but if a man be unlearned, weak in intellect, an infant, let him come with confidence. Confessing that these are worthy of their God, they evidently desire, as they are able, to convert none but fools, and vulgar, and stupid, and slavish, women and boys." They " take in the simple, and lead him where they will." They address themselves to " youths, house-servants, and the weak in intellect." They " hurry away from the educated, as not fit subjects of their imposition, and inveigle the rustic." 6 "Thou," says the heathen magistrate to the Martyr Fructuosus, " who as a teacher dost disseminate a new * " Itaquo imposaistis in cervicibus nostris sempiternum domiuum, quern dies et noctes timeremus ; quis eniin non timeat omnia providentem et cogitantein et animadvertentem, et omnia ad se pertinere putantem, curiosuui, et plenum negobii Denm ? " Cic. de Nat. Dear. i. 20. 4 Min. c. 11. Lact. v. 1, 2, vid. Arnob. ii. 8, &o. * Origen, coutr. Cels. i. 9, iii. 44, 50, vi. 44. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 229 fable, that fickle girls may desert the groves and abandon Jupiter, condemn, if thou art wise, the anile creed." ( 18. Hence the epithets of itinerant, mountebank, conjurer, cheat, sophist, sorcerer, heaped upon the teachers of Christianity ; sometimes to account for the report or apparent truth of their miracles, sometimes to explain their success. Our Lord was said to have learned His miracu- lous power in Egypt ; " wizard, mediciner, cheat, rogue, conjurer," were the epithets applied to Him by the oppo- nents of Eusebius ; 7 they " worship that crucified sophist," says Lucian ; * " Paul, who surpasses all the conjurers and impostors who ever lived," is Julian's account of the Apostle. " You have sent through the whole world," says St. Justin to Trypho, "to preach that a certain atheistic and lawless sect has sprung from one Jesus, a Galilean cheat." * " We know," says Lucian, speaking of Chaldeans and Magicians, " the Syrian from Palestine, who is the sophist in these matters, how many lunatics, with eyes distorted and mouth in foam, he raises and sends away restored, ridding them from the evil at a great price." * " If any conjurer came to them, a man of skill and knowing how to manage matters," says the same writer, " he made money in no time, with a broad grin at the simple fellows." 2 The officer who had custody of St. Perpetua feared her escape from prison " by magical in- cantations." 8 When St. Tiburtius had walked barefoot on hot coals, his judge cried out that Christ had taught him magic. St. Anastasia was thrown into prison as a mediciner; the populace called out against St. Agnes, " Away with the witch/' Tolle magarn, tolle makficam. Prudent, in hon. Fruct. 37. * Evan. Dem. iii. 8, 4. 8 Mort. Peregr. 13. 9 c. 108. > i. e. Pbilop. 16. De Morfc. Pereg. ibid. Ruin. Mart. pp. 100, 594> &c. 230 THE CHUKCH Of [CH. Vt. When St. Bonosus and St. Maximilian bore the burning pitch without shrinking, Jews and Gentiles cried out, Isti magiet malefici. "What new delusion," says the heathen magistrate concerning St. Romanus, " has brought in these sophists to deny the worship of the gods ? How doth this chief sorcerer mock us, skilled by his Thessalian charm (carmine) to laugh at punishment/' * Hence we gather the meaning of the word " carmen " as used by Pliuy ; when he speaks of the Christians " saying with one another a carmen to Christ as to a god," he meant pretty much what Suetonius expresses by the "malefica mperstitio." * And the words of the last-mentioned writer and Tacitus are still more exactly, and, I may sa\% singu- larly illustrated by clauses which occur in the Theodosian code ; which seem to show that these historians were using formal terms and phrases to express their notion of Chris- tianity. For instance, Tacitus says, " Quos per flagitia invisos, vulgus Christianas appellabat ;" and the Law against the Malefici and Mathematici in the Code speaks of those, "Quos obfacinorum magnitudinem vulgus malejicos appellat"* Again, Tacitus charges Christians with the " odium humani generis :" this is the very characteristic of a practiser in magic ; the Laws call the Malefici, " humani generis hostes" "humani generis inimici," " natur& peregrini" " commit nix salutis hostes" ' 4 Prud. in hon. Rom. vv. 404, 868. * We have specimens of cannina ascribed to Christians in the Philopatris. Goth, in Cod. Th. t. 5, p. 120, ed. 1665. Again, " Qui malefici vulgi cousuetudine noncnpantur." Leg. 6. So Lactantius, " Magi et ii quoe vere maleficos vulgus appellut." Inst. ii. 17- " Quos et maleficos vulgus appellate" August. Civ. Dei, x. 19. " Quos vulgus mathematicos voeat." Uierou. in Dan. c. ii. Vid. Qothof. in loc. Other laws speak of those who were " maleficiorum labe polluti," and of the " malertcioruin scabies." 7 Tertullian too mentions the charge of " hostes principum Romaiiorum, populi, generis humani, Deoruni, Imperatorum, leguui, morum, nature totius inimici." Apol. 2, 35, 38, ad. Scap. 4, ad. Nat. i. 17. 3BCT. L] THE FIRST CENTURIfiS. 231 19. This also explains the phenomenon, which has created so much surprise to certain moderns ; that a grave, well- informed historian like Tacitus should apply to Christians what sounds like abuse. Yet what is the difficulty, supposing that Christians were considered mathematici and magi, and these were the secret intriguers against established government, the allies of desperate politicians, the enemies of the established religion, the disseminators of lying rumours, the perpetrators of poisonings and other crimes? " Read this/' says Paley, after quoting some of the most beautiful and subduing passages of St. Paul, " read this, and then think of exitiabilis sitperstitio;" and he goes on to express a wish " in contending with heathen authorities, to produce our books against theirs," 8 as if it were a matter of books. Public men care very little for books ; the finest sentiments, the most luminous philosophy, the deepest theology, inspiration itself, moves them but little ; they look at facts, and care only for facts. The ques- tion was, What was the worth, what the tendency of the Christian body in the state ? what Christians said, what they thought, was little to the purpose. They might exhort to peaceableness and passive obedience as strongly as words could speak ; but what did they do, what was their political position ? This is what statesmen thought of then, as they do now. What had men of the world to do with abstract proofs or first principles ? a statesman measures parties, and sects, and writers by their bearing upon him; and he has a practised eye in this sort of judgment, and is not likely to be mistaken. " ' What is Truth ? ' said jesting Pilate." Apologies, however elo- quent or true, availed nothing with the Roman magis- trate against the sure instinct which taught him to dread ' Evid. part ii. cb. 4. 232 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VL Christianity. It was a dangerous enemy to any power not built upon itself; he felt it, and the event justified his apprehension. 20. We must not forget the well-known character of the Roman state in its dealings with its subjects. It had had from the first an extreme jealousy of secret societies ; it was prepared to grant a large toleration and a broad comprehension, but, as is the case with modern govern- ments, it wished to have jurisdiction and the ultimate authority in every movement of the body politic and social, and its civil institutions were based, or essentially depended, on its religion. Accordingly, every innovation upon the established paganism, except it was allowed by the law, was rigidly repressed. Hence the professors of low superstitions, of mysteries, of magic, of astrology, were the outlaws of society, and were in a condition analogous, if the comparison may be allowed, to smugglers or poachers among ourselves, or perhaps to burglars and highwaymen. The modern robber is sometimes made to ask in novels or essays, why the majority of a people should bind the minority, and why he is amenable to laws which he does not enact ; but the magistrate, relying on the power of the sword, wishes all men to gain a living indeed, and to prosper, but only in his own legally sanctioned ways, and he hangs or transports dissenters from his authority. The Romans applied this rule to religion. Lardner protests against Pliny's application of the words " contumacy and inflexible obstinacy " to the Christians of Pontus. "Indeed, these are hard words," he says, " very improperly applied to men who were open to con- viction, and willing to satisfy others, if they might have leave to speak."* And he says, "It seems to me that Heathen Test. 9. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 233 Pliny acted very arbitrarily and unrighteously, in his treatment of the Christians in his province. What right had Pliny to act in this manner ? by what law or laws did he punish [them] with death?" but the Romans had ever burnt the sorcerer, and banished his consulters for life. 1 It was an ancient custom. And at mysteries they looked with especial suspicion, because, since the established religion did not include them in its provisions, they really did supply what may be called a demand of the age. The Greeks of an earlier day had naturalized among themselves the Eleusinian and other mysteries, which had come from Egypt and Syria, and had little to fear from a fresh invasion from the same quarter; yet even in Greece, as Plutarch tell us, the " carmina" of the itinerants of Cybele and Serapis threw the Pythian verses out of iashion, and henceforth the responses from the temple were given in prose. Soon the oracles altogether ceased. What would cause in the Roman mind still greater jealousy of Christianity was the general infidelity which prevailed among all classes as regards the mythological fables of Charon, Cerberus, and the realms of punishment. 8 21. We know what opposition had been made in Rome even to the philosophy of Greece ; much greater would be the aversion of constitutional statesmen and lawyers to the ritual of barbarians. Religion was the Roman point of honour. " Spaniards might rival them in numbers," says Cicero, " Gauls in bodily strength, Carthaginians in address, Greeks in the arts, Italians and Latins in native talent, but the Romans surpassed all nations in piety and l Gotbof. in Cod. Th. t. 5, p. 121. 1 Cic. pro Cluent. 61. Gieseler transl. voL L p. 21, note 5. Acad. Inscr. t. 34. hiat. p. 110. 234 THE CHURCH Of [CH. VI. devotion." 8 It was one of their laws, " Let no one have gods by himself, nor worship in private new gods nor adventitious, unless added on public authority." 4 Luta- tius,* at the end of the first Punio war, was forbidden by the senate to consult the Sortes Praenestinae as being " auspicia alienigena" Some years afterwards the Consul took axe in hand, and commenced the destruction of the temples of Isis and Serapis. In the second Punic war, the senate had commanded the surrender of the libri vaticini or precationes, and any written art of sacrificing. When a secret confraternity was discovered, at a later date, the Consul spoke of the rule of their ancestors which forbade the forum, circus, and city to Sacrificuli and prophets, and burnt their books. In the next age banishment was in- flicted on individuals who were introducing the worship of the Syrian Sabazius ; and in the next the Iseion and Serapeion were destroyed a second time. Maecenas in Dio advises Augustus to honour the gods according to the national custom, because the contempt of the country's deities leads to civil insubordination, reception of foreign laws, conspiracies, and secret meetings. 6 " Suffer no one," he adds, " to deny the gods or to practise sorcery." The civilian Julius Paulus lays it down as one of the leading principles of Roman Law, that those who introduce new or untried religions should be degraded, and if in the lower orders put to death. 7 In like manner, it is enacted in one of Constantine's Laws that the Haruspices should not exercise their art in private ; and there is a law of Valentinian's against nocturnal sacrifices or magic. It is more immediately to our purpose that Trajan had been so earnest in his resistance to HefaricB or secret societies, that, when a fire had laid waste Nicomedia, and Pliny 3 De Harusp. Resp. 9. * De Legg. ii. 8. 5 Ai ail. Inscr. ibid. 6 Neander, Eccl. Hist. tr. vol. i. p. 81. 7 Muller, p 21, 22, 30. TertulL Ox. tr. p. 12, note p. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 285 proposed to him to incorporate a body of a hundred and fifty firemen in consequence, 8 he was afraid of the prece- dent and forbade it. 22. What has been said will suggest another point of view in which the Oriental rites were obnoxious to the govern- ment, viz., as being vagrant and proselytizing religions. If it tolerated foreign superstitions, this would be on the ground that districts or countries within its jurisdiction held them; to proselytize to a rite hitherto unknown, to form a new party, and to propagate it through the Empire, a religion not local but Catholic, was an offence against both order and reason. The state desired peace everywhere, and no change ; " considering," according to Lactantius, "that they were rightly and deservedly punished who execrated the public religion handed down to them by their ancestors. " 9 It is impossible surely to deny that, in assembling for religious purposes, the Christians were breaking a solemn law, a vital principle of the Roman constitution ; and this is the light in which their conduct was regarded by the historians and philosophers of the Empire. This was a very strong act on the part of the disciples of the great Apostle, who had enjoined obedience to the powers that be. Time after time they resisted the authority of the magistrate ; and this is a phenomenon inexplicable on the theory of Private Judgment or of the Voluntary Principle. The justification of such disobedience lies simply in the necessity of obeying the higher authority of some divine law ; but if Christianity were in its essence only private and personal, as so many now think, there was no necessity of their meeting together at all. If, on the other hand, in assembling for worship and holy com- 8 Gibbon. Hist, eh 16, note 14. 9 Epit luntit. 56. THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. munion, they were fulfilling an indispensable observance, Christianity has imposed a social law on the world, and formally enters the field of politics. Gibbon says that, in consequence of Pliny's edict, " the prudence of the Chris- tians suspended their Agapge; but it was impossible for them to omit the exercise of public worship." J We can draw no other conclusion. 23. At the end of three hundred years, a more remarkable violation of law seems to have been admitted by the Chris- tian body. It shall be given in the words of Dr. Burton ; he has been speaking of Maximin's edict, which provided for the restitution of any of their lands or buildings which had been alienated from them. " It is plain," he says, " from the terms of this edict, that the Christians had for some time been in possession of property. It speaks of houses and lauds which did not belong to individuals, but to the whole body. Their possession of such property could hardly have escaped the notice of the government ; but it seems to have been held in direct violation of a law of Diocletian, which prohibited corporate bodies, or associa- tions which were not legally recognized, from acquiring property. The Christians were certainly not a body re- cognized by law at the beginning of the reign of Diocletian, and it might almost be thought that this enactment was specially directed against them. But, like other laws which are founded upon tyranny, and are at variance with the first principles of justice, it is probable that this law about corporate property was evaded. We must suppose that the Christians had purchased lands and houses before the law was passed ; and their disregard 1 Gibbon, ibid. Origen admits and defends the violation of the laws : OVK &\oyov ffvv6r,KM irapck T& vevotJ.tfffj.ffa voittv, rcki virtp a\fidfica. c, Cek. i. 1. SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 237 of the prohibition may be taken as another proof that their religion had now taken so firm a footing that the executors of the laws were obliged to connive at their being broken by so numerous a body." * 24. No wonder that the magistrate who presided at the martyrdom of St. Romanus calls them in Prudentius " a rebel people ;" 8 that Galerius speaks of them as " a nefarious conspiracy ;" the heathen in Minucius, as " men of a desperate faction ;" that others make them guilty of sacrilege and treason, and call them by those other titles which, more closely resembling the language of Tacitus, have been noticed above. Hence the violent accusations against them as the destruction 3^ the Empire, the authors of physical evils, and the cause of the anger of the gods. " Men cry out," says Tertullian, " that the state is beset, that the Christians are in their fields, in their forts, in their islands. They mourn as for a loss that every sex, condition, and now even rank, is going over to this sect. And yet they do not by this very means advance their minds to the idea of some good therein hidden; they allow not themselves to conjecture more rightly, they choose not to examine more closely. The generality run upon a hatred of this name, with eyes so closed that in bearing favourable testimony to any one they mingle with it the reproach of the name. ' A good man Caius Seius, only he is a Christian.' So another, 'I marvel that that wise man Lucius Titius hath suddenly become a Christian.' No one reflecteth whether Caius be not there- fore good and Lucius wise because a Christian, or therefore a Christian because wise and good. They praise that * Hist. p. 418. 3 In hon. Rom. 62, In Act S. Cypr. 4, Tert. Apol. 10, Ac. 238 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. which they know, they revile that which they know not. Virtue is not in such account as hatred of the Chris- tians. Now, then, if the hatred be of the name, what guilt is there in names? What charge against words? Unless it be that any word which is a name have either a barbarous or ill-omened, or a scurrilous or an immodest sound. If the Tiber cometh up to the walls, if the Nile cometh not up to the fields, if the heaven hath stood still, if the earth hath been moved, if there be any famine, if any pestilence, ' The Christians to the lions ' is forthwith the word."* 25. " Men of a desperate, lawless, reckless faction," says the heathen Csecilius, in the passage above referred to, " who collect together out of the lowest rabble the thoughtless portion, and credulous women seduced by the weakness of their sex, and form a mob of impure conspirators, of whom nocturnal assemblies, and solemn fastings, and unnatural food, no sacred rite but pollution, is the bond. A tribe lurking and light-hating, dumb for the public, talkative in corners, they despise our temples as if graves, spit at our gods, deride our religious forms ; pitiable themselves, they pity, forsooth, our priests; half-naked themselves, they despise our honours and purple; monstrous folly and incredible impudence ! . . . Day after day, their aban- doned morals wind their serpentine course ; over the whole world are those most hideous rites of an impious association growing into shape : . . . they recognize each other by marks and signs, and love each other almost before they recognize ; promiscuous lust is their religion. Thus does their vain and mad superstition glory in crimes. . . The writer who tells the story of a criminal capitally punished, and of the gibbet (ligna feralia) of the cross being their Apol. i. 3, 39, Oxt. tr. SECT. I.] ^THE- FIRST CENTURIES. 239 observance (ceremonias) , assigns to them thereby an altar in keeping with the abandoned and wicked, that they may worship (colant) what they merit. . . . Why their mighty effort to hide and shroud whatever it is they worship (colunt), since things honest ever like the open day, and crimes are secret ? Why have they no altars, no temples, no images known to us, never speak abroad, never assemble freely, were it not that what they worship and suppress is subject either of punishment or of shame ? . . What monstrous, what portentous notions do they fabricate ! that that God of theirs, whom they can neither show nor see, should be inquiring diligently into the characters, the acts, nay the words and secret thoughts of all men ; rnnning to and fro, forsooth, and present everywhere, troublesome, restless, nay impudently curious they would have him ; that is, if he is close at every deed, interferes in all places, while he can neither attend to each as being distracted through the whole, nor suffice for the whole as being engaged about each. Think too of their threatening fire, meditating destruction to the whole earth, nay the world itself with its stars ! . . . Nor content with this mad opinion, they add and append their old wives' tales about a new birth after death, ashes and cinders, and by some strange confidence believe each other's lies. Poor creatures ! consider what hangs over you after death, while you are still alive. Lo, the greater part of you, the better, as you say, are in want, cold, toil, hunger, and your God suffers it ; but I omit common trials. Lo, threats are offered to you, punishments, torments ; crosses to be undergone now, not worshipped (adorandcB) ; fires too which ye predict and fear ; where is that God who can recover, but cannot preserve your life ? The answer of Socrates, when he was asked about heavenly matters, is well known, ' What is above us does not concern us.' My opinion also is, that points which are doubtful, as are the 240 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. points in question, must be left ; nor, when so many and such great men are in controversy on the subject, must judgment be rashly and audaciously given on either side, lest the consequence be either anile superstition or the overthrow of all religion." 26. Such was Christianity in the eyes of those who witnessed its rise and propagation ; one of a number of wild and barbarous rites which were pouring in upon the Empire from the ancient realms of superstition, and the mother of a progeny of sects which were faithful to the original they had derived from Egypt or Syria ; a religion unworthy of an educated person, as appealing, not to the intellect, but to the fears and weaknesses of human nature, and consisting, not in the rational and cheerful enjoyment, but in a morose rejection of the gifts of Providence ; a horrible religion, as inflicting or enjoining cruel sufferings, and monstrous and loathsome in its very indulgence of the passions ; a religion leading by reaction to infidelity; a religion of magic, and of the vulgar arts, real and pretended, with which magic was accompanied; a secret religion which dared not face the day ; an itinerant, busy, proselytizing religion, forming an extended confederacy against the state, resisting its authority and breaking its laws. There may be some exceptions to this general impression, such as Pliny's discovery of the innocent and virtuous rule of life adopted by the Christians of Pontus ; but this only proves that Christianity was not in fact the infamous religion which the heathen thought it ; it did not reverse their general belief to that effect. 27. Now it must be granted that, in some respects, this view of Christianity depended on the times, and would alter with their alteration. When there was no persecution, Mar- SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 241 tyrs could not be obstinate ; and when the Church was raised aloft in high places, it was no longer in caves. Still, I believe, it continued substantially the same in the judgment of the world external to it, while there was an external world to judge of it. " They thought it enough," gays Julian in the fourth century, of our Lord and His Apostles, " to deceive women, servants, and slaves, and by their means wives and husbands." " A human fabrication," says he elsewhere, " put together by wickedness, having nothing divine in it, but making a perverted use of the fable-loving, childish, irrational part of the soul, and offering a set of wonders to create belief." " Miserable men," he says elsewhere, "you refuse to worship the ancile, yet you worship the wood of the cross, and sign it on your foreheads, and fix it on your doors. Shall one for this hate the intelligent among you, or pity the lesa understanding, who in following you have gone to such an excess of perdition as to leave the everlasting gods and go over to a dead Jew P " He speaks of their adding other dead men to Him who died so long ago. " You have filled all places with sepulchres and monuments, though it is nowhere told you in your religion to haunt the tombs and to attend upon them." Elsewhere he speaks of their " leaving the gods for corpses and relics." On the other hand, he attributes the growth of Christianity to its humanity towards strangers, care in burying the dead, and pretended religiousness of life. In another place he speaks of their care of the poor.* Libanius, Julian's preceptor in rhetoric, delivers the same testimony, as far as it goes. He addressed his Oration for the Temples to a Christian Emperor, and would in consequence be guarded in his language ; however it runs in one direction. He speaks of "those black-habited s Julian ap, Cyril, pp. 39, 194, 206, 335 Epp. pp. 305, 429, 438, ed. Spanh. * 242 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. men," meaning the monks, " who eat more than elephants, and by the number of their potations trouble those who send them drink in their chan tings, and conceal this by paleness artificially acquired." They " are in good con- dition out of the misfortunes of others, while they pretend to serve God by hunger." Those whom they attack " are like bees, they like drones." I do not quote this passage to prove that there were monks in Libanius's days, which no one doubts, but to show his impression of Christianity, as far as his works betray it. Numantian, in the same century, describes in verse his voyage from Rome to Gaul: one book of the poem is extant ; he falls in with Christianity on two of the islands which lie in his course. He thus describes them as found on one of these : " The island is in a squalid state, being full of light-haters. They call themselves monks, because they wish to live alone without witness. They dread the gifts, from fearing the reverses, of fortune. Thus Homer says that melancholy was the cause of Bellerophon's anxiety ; for it is said that after the wounds of grief mankind dis- pleased the offended youth." He meets on the other island a Christian, whom he had known, of good family and fortune, and happy in his marriage, who " impelled by the Furies had left men and gods, and, credulous exile, was living in base concealment. Is not this herd/' he continues, " worse than Circean poison ? then bodies were changed, now minds/' 28. In the Philopatris, which is the work of an Author of the fourth century/ Critias is introduced pale and wild. His friend asks him if he has seen Cerberus or Hecate ; and he answers that he has heard a rigmarole from cer- tain " thrice-cursed sophists ;" which he thinks would 6 Niebuhr ascribes it to the beginning of the tenth. BECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. drive him mad, if he heard it again, and was Bending him headlong over some cliff as it was. retires for relief with his inquirer to a pleasant shadowed by planes, where swallows and nightingales are singing, and a quiet brook is purling. Triephon, his friend, expresses a fear lest he has heard some incanta- tion, and is led by the course of the dialogue, before his friend tells his tale, to give some account of Christianity, being himself a Christian. After speaking of the crea- tion, as described by Moses, he falls at oiice upon that doctrine of a particular providence which is so dis- tasteful to Plutarch, Velleius in Cicero, and Csecilius, and generally to unbelievers. " He is in heaven," he says, " looking at just and unjust, and causing actions to be entered in books ; and He will recompense all on a day which He has appointed." Critias objects that he cannot make this consistent with the received doctrine about the Fates, " even though he has perhaps been carried aloft with his master, and initiated in unspeakable mysteries/' He also asks if the deeds of the Scythians are written in heaven ; for if so, there must be many scribes there. After some more words, in course of which, as in the earlier part of the dialogue, the doctrine of the Holy Trinity is introduced, Critias gives an account of what befell him. He says, he fell in with a crowd in the streets ; and, while asking a friend the cause of it, others joined them (Christians or monks), and a conversation ensues, part of it corrupt or obscure, on the subject, as Gesner supposes, of Julian's oppression of the Christians, especially of the clergy. One of these interlocutors is a wretched old man, whose " phlegm is paler than death ;" another has " a rotten cloke on, and no covering on head or feet/' who says he has been told by some ill-clad person from the mountains, with a shorn crown, that in the theatre was a name hieroglyphically written of one who would R 2 244 THE CHURCH OP [OH. VI. flood the highway with gold. On his laughing at the story, his friend Orato, whom he had joined, bids him be silent, using a Pythagorean word ; for he has " most excellent matters to initiate him into, and that the predic- tion is no dream but true," and will be fulfilled in August, using the Egyptian name of the month. He attempts to leave them in disgust, but Crato pulls him back " at the instigation of that old demon." He is in consequence persuaded to go "to those conjurers," who, says Crato, would " initiate in all mysteries." He finds, in a building which is described in the language used by Homer of the Palace of Menelaus, " not Helen, no, but men pale and downcast," who ask, whether there was any bad news; "for they seemed," he says, "wishing the worst; and rejoicing in misfortune, as the Furies in the theatres." On their asking him how the city and the world went on, and his answering that things went on smoothly and seemed likely to do so still, they frown, and say that " the city is in travail with a bad birth." " You, who dwell aloft," he answers, "and see everything from on high, doubtless have a keen perception in this matter ; but tell me, how is the sky ? will the Sun be eclipsed ? will Mars be in quadrature with Jupiter ? &c. ;" and he goes on to jest upon their celibacy. On their persisting in prophesy- ing evil to the state, he says, " This evil will fall on your own head, since you are so hard upon your country ; for not as high-flyers have ye heard this, nor are ye adepts in the restless astrological art, but if divinations and coii- jurings have seduced you, double is your stupidity ; for they are the discoveries of old women and things to laugh at." The interview then draws to an end; but more than enough has been quoted already to show the author's notion of Christianity, SECT. I.] THE FIE8T CENTURIES. 246 29. Such was the language of paganism after Christianity had for fifty years been exposed to the public gaze ; after it had been before the world for fifty more, St Augustine had still to defend it against the charge of being the cause of the calamities of the Empire. And for the charge of magic, when the Arian bishops were in formal dis- putations with the Catholic, before Gungebald, Burgundian King of France, at the end of the fifth century, we find still that they charged the Catholics with being " prcestigiatores" and worshipping a number of gods ; and when the Catholics proposed that the king should repair to the shrine of St. Justus, where both parties might ask him concerning their respective faiths, the Arians cried out that " they would not seek enchantments like Saul, for Scripture was enough for them, which was more powerful than all be- witchments." 7 This was said, not against strangers of whom they knew nothing, as Ethelbert might be sus- picious of St. Augustine and his brother missionaries, but against a body of men who lived among them. I do not think it can be doubted then that, had Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny, Celsus, Prophyry, and the other opponents of Christianity, lived in the fourth century, their evidence concerning Christianity would be very much the Bame as it has come down to us from the centuries before it. In either case, a man of the world and a philosopher would have been disgustedatthegloomandsadnessof its profession, its mysteriousness, its claim of miracles, the want of good sense impu table to its rule of life, and the unsettlement and discord it was introducing into the social and political world. 30. On the whole then I conclude as follows : if there is a i Sirm. Opp. ii. p. 225, ed. Ven. 246 IHB CHURCH ev [CH. vi. form of Christianity now in the world which is accused of gross superstition, of borrowing its rites and customs from the heathen, and of ascribing to forms and ceremonies an occult virtue ', a religion which is considered to burden and enslave the mind by its requisitions, to address itself to the weak-minded and ignorant, to be supported by sophistry and imposture, and to contradict reason and exalt mere irrational faith ; a religion which impresses on the serious mind very distressing views of the guilt and consequences of sin, sets upon the minute acts of the day, one by one, their definite value for praise or blame, and thus casts a grave shadow over the future; a re- ligion which holds up to admiration the surrender of wealth, and disables serious persons from enjoying it if they would ; a religion, the doctrines of which, be they good or bad, are to the generality of men unknown ; torhich is considered to bear on its very surface signs of folly and falsehood so distinct that a glance suffices to judge of it, and that careful examination is preposterous; which is felt to be so simply bad, that it may be calumniated at hazard and at pleasure, it being nothing but absurdity to stand upon the accurate distribution of its guilt among its particular acts, or painfully to de- termine how far this or that story concerning it is literally true, or what has to be allowed in candour, or what is improbable, or what cuts two ways, or what is not proved, or what may be plausibly defended ; a religion such, that men look at a convert to it with a feeling which no other denomination raises except Judaism, Socialism, or Mormonism, via. with curiosity, suspicion, fear, disgust, as the case may be, as if something strange had befallen him, as if he had had an initiation into a mystery, and had come into communion with dreadful influences, as if he were now one of a confederacy which claimed him, absorbed him, stripped him of his personality, SECT. I.] THE FIRST CENTURIES. 247 reduced him to a mere organ or instrument of a whole ; a religion which men hate as proselytizing, anti-social, revolutionary, as dividing families, separating chief friends, corrupting the maxims of government, making a mock at law, dissolving the empire, the enemy of human nature, and a " conspirator against its rights and privileges ;" 8 a religion which they consider the champion and instru- ment of darkness, and a pollution calling down upon the land the anger of heaven; a religion which they asso- ciate with intrigue and conspiracy, which they speak about in whispers, which they detect by anticipation in whatever goes wrong, and to which they impute what- ever is unaccountable ; a religion, the very name of which they cast out as evil, and use simply as a bad epithet, and which from the impulse of self-preservation they would persecute if they could j if there be such a religion now in the world, it is not unlike Christianity as that same world viewed it, when first it came forth from its Divine Author.' Proph. Office, p. 132 [Via Media, vol. i. p. 109]. * [Since the publication of this volume in 1845, a writer in a Conserva- tive periodical of great name has considered that no happier designation could be bestowed upon us than that which heathen statesmen gave to the first Christians, " enemies of the human race." What a remarkable witness to our identity with the Church of St. Paul ("a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition throughout the world "), of St. Ignatius, St. Polycarp, and the other Martyrs t In this mutter, Conservative politicians join with Liberals, and with the movement parties in Great Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, in their view of our religion. "The Catholics," says the Quarterly Review for January, 1873, pp. 181-2, " wherever they are numerous and powerful in a Protestant nation, compel (sic) as it were by a law of their being, that nation to treat them with stern repression and control. . . . Catholicism, if it be true to itself, and its mission, cannot (sic) . . . wherever and whenever the opportunity is afforded it, abstain from claiming, working for, and grasping that supremacy and paramount influence and control, which it conscientiously believes to be its inalienable and universal due. ... By the force of circumstances, by the inexorable logic of its claims, it must be the intestine foe or the disturb 248 THE CHURCH OF [OH. VI. SECTION II. THE CHURCH OF THE FOURTH CENTURY. Till the Imperial Government had become Christian, and heresies were put down by the arm of power, the face of Christendom presented much the same appearance all along as on the first propagation of the religion. What Gnos- ticism, Montanism, Judaism and, I may add, the Oriental mysteries were to the nascent Church, as described in the foregoing Section, such were the Manichean, Donatist, Apollinarian and contemporary sects afterwards. The Church in each place looked at first sight as but one out of a number of religious communions, with little of a very distinctive character except to the careful inquirer. Still there were external indications of essential differences within ; and, as we have already compared it in the first centuries, we may now contrast it in the fourth, with the rival religious bodies with which it was encompassed. 2. How was the man to guide his course who wished to join himself to the doctrine and fellowship of the Apostles in the times of St. Athanasius, St. Basil, and St. Augustine? Few indeed were the districts in the orbis terrarum, which did not then, as in the Ante-nicene era, present a number of creeds and communions for his choice. Gaul indeed is said at that era to have been perfectly free from heresies ; at least none are mentioned as belonging to that country in the Theodosian Code. But in Egypt, in the early part of the fourth century, the Meletian schism numbered one- ing element of every state in which it does not bear sway ; and ... it must now stand out in the estimate of all Protestants, Patriots and Thinkers " (philosophers and historians, as Tacitus ?) " as the hostis hwnani generis (sic), &c.] SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 249 third as many bishops as were contained in the whole Patri- archate. In Africa, towards the end of it, while the Catholic Bishops amounted in all to 466, the Donatists rivalled them with as many as 400. In Spain Priscillianism was spread from the Pyrenees to the Ocean. It seems to have been the religion of the population in the province of Gallicia, while its author Priscillian, whose death had been contrived by the Ithacians, was honoured as a Martyr. The Manichees, hiding themselves under a variety of names in different localities, were not in the least flourish- ing condition at Rome. Rome and Italy were the seat of the Marcionites. The Origenists, too, are mentioned by St. Jerome as " bringing a cargo of blasphemies into the port of Rome." And Rome was the seat of a Novatian, a Donatist, and a Luciferian bishop, in addition to the legi- timate occupant of the See of St. Peter. The Luciferians, as was natural under the circumstances of their schism, were sprinkled over Christendom from Spain to Palestine, and from Treves.to Lybia; while in its parent country Sardinia, as a centre of that extended range, Lucifer seems to have received the honours of a Saint. When St. Gregory Nazianzen began to preach at Constantinople, the Arians were in possession of its hundred churches; they had the populace in their favour, and, after their legal dislodgment, edict after edict was ineffectually issued against them. The Novatians too abounded there j and the Sabbatians, who had separated from them, had a church, where they prayed at the tomb of their founder. Moreover, Apollinarians, Eunomians, and Semi-arians, mustered in great numbers at Constanti- nople. The Semi-arian bishops were as popular in the neighbouring provinces, as the Arian doctrine in the capital They had possession of the coast of the Hellespont and Bithynia ; and were found in Phrygia, Isauria, and the neighbouring parts of Asia Minor. Phrygia was the 250 TEE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. headquarters of the Montanists, and was overrun by the Messalians, who had advanced thus far from Mesopotamia, spreading through Syria, Lycaonia, Pamphylia, and Cappadocia in their way. In the lesser Armenia, the same heretics had penetrated into the monasteries. Phrygia, too, and Paphlagonia were the seat of the Novatians, who besides were in force at Nicsea and Nicomedia, were found in Alexandria, Africa, and Spain, and had a bishop even in Scythia. The whole tract of country from the Hellespont to Cilicia had nearly lapsed into Eunomianism, and the tract from Cilicia as far as Phcenicia into Apollinarianism. The disorders of the Church of Antioch are well known : an Arian succession, two orthodox claimants, and a bishop of the Apollinarians. Palestine abounded in Origenists, if at that time they may properly be called a sect ; Palestine, Egypt, and Arabia were overrun with Marcionites; Osrhoene was occupied by the followers of Bardesanes and Harmonius, whose hymns so nearly took the place of national tunes that St. Ephrem found no better way of resisting the heresy than setting them to fresh words. Theodoret in Coma- gene speaks in the next century of reclaiming eight villages of Marcionites, one of Eunomians, and one of Arian s. 8. These sects were of very various character. Learning, eloquence, and talent were the characteristics of the Apolli- narians, Manichees, and Pelagians; Tichonius the Dona- tiat was distinguished in Biblical interpretation; the Semi-arian and Apollinarian leaders were men of grave and correct behaviour ; the Novatians had sided with the Orthodox during the Arian persecution ; the Montanists and Messalians addressed themselves to an almost heathen population ; the atrocious fanaticism of the PriscillianistSj SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 251 the fury of the Arian women of Alexandria and Constan- tinople, and the savage cruelty of the Circumcellions can hardly be exaggerated. These various sectaries had their orders of clergy, bishops, priests and deacons; their readers and ministers ; their celebrants and altars ; their hymns and litanies. They preached to the crowds in public, and their meeting-houses bore the semblance of churches. They had their sacristies and cemetries ; their farms ; their professors and doctors ; their schools. Miracles were ascribed to the Arian Theophilus, to the Luciferian Gregory of Elvira, to a Macedonian in Cyzicus, and to the Donatists in Africa. How was an individual inquirer to find, or a private Christian to keep the Truth, amid so many rival teachers ? The misfortunes or perils of holy men and saints show us the difficulty ; St. Augustine was nine years a Manichee ; St. Basil for a time was in admiration of the Semi-arians ; St. Sulpicius gave a momentary countenance to the Pelagians; St. Paula listened, and Melania assented, to the Origenists. Yet the rule was simple, which would direct every one right j and in that age, at least, no one could be wrong for any long time without his own fault. The Church is everywhere, but it is one ; sects are every- where, but they are many, independent and discordant. Catholicity is the attribute of the Church, independency of sectaries. It is true that some sects might seem almost Catholic in their diffusion ; Novatians or Marcionites were in all quarters of the empire ; yet it is hardly more than the name, or the general doctrine or philosophy, that was universal : the different portions which professed it seem to have been bound together by no strict or definite tie. The Church might be evanescent or lost for a while in particular countries, or it might be levelled and buried 252 THB CHUBCH OP [CH. VI. among sects, when the eye was confined to one spot, or it might be confronted by the one and same heresy in various places; but, on looking round the orbis terrarum, there was no mistaking that body which, and which alone, had possession of it. The Church is a kingdom ; a heresy is a family rather than a kingdom ; and as a family continually divides and sends out branches, founding new houses, and propagating itself in colonies, each of them as independent as its original head, so was it with heresy. Simon Magus, the first heretic, had been Patriarch of Menandrians, Basilidians, Valentinians, and the whole family of Gnostics ; Tatian of Encratites, Severians, Aquarians, Apotactites, and Saccophori. The Montanists had been propagated into Tascodrugites, Pepuzians, Artotyrites, and Quartodecimans* Eutyches, in a later time, gave birth to the Dioscorians, Gaianites, Theodosians, Agnoetae, Theo- paschites, Acephali, Semidalitse, Nagranitae, Jacobites, and others. This is the uniform history of heresy. The patronage of the civil power might for a time counteract the law of its nature, but it showed it as soon as that obstacle was removed. Scarcely was Arianism deprived of the churches of Constantinople, and left to itself, thar> it split in that very city into the Dorotheans, the Psathyrians, and the Curtians ; and the Eunomians into the Theophronians and Eutychians. One fourth part of the Donatists speedily became Maximinianists ; and besides these were the Rogatians, the Primianists, the Urbanists, and the Claudianists. If such was the fecundity of the heretical principle in one place, it is not to be supposed that Novatians or Marcionites in Africa or the East would feel themselves bound to think or to act with their fellow-sectaries of Rome or Constantinople ; and the great varieties or inconsistencies of statement, which have come down to us concerning the tenets of heresies, may thus be explained. This had been the case with the pagan BECT. IL] THE FOURTH CENTUEY. 258 rites, whether indigenous or itinerant, to which heresy succeeded. The established priesthoods were local pro- perties, as independent theologically as they were geogra- phically of each other; the fanatical companies which spread over the Empire dissolved and formed again as the circumstances of the moment occasioned. So was it with heresy : it was, by its very nature, its own master, free to change, self-sufficient; and, having thrown off the yoke of the Church, it was little likely to submit to any usurped and spurious authority. Montanism and Manicheeism might perhaps in some wort furnish an exception to this remark. 5. In one point alone the heresies seem universally to have agreed, in hatred to the Church. This might at that time be considered one of her surest and most obvious Notes. She was that body of which all sects, however divided among themselves, spoke ill; according to the prophecy, " If they have called the Master of the house Beelzebub, how much more them of His household." They disliked and they feared her ; they did their utmost to overcome their mutual differences, in order to unite against her. Their utmost indeed was little, for inde- pendency was the law of their being ; they could not exert themselves without fresh quarrels, both in the bosom of each, and one with another. " Bellum hcereticorum pax est eeclesicp " had become a proverb ; but they felt the great desirableness of union against the only body which was the natural antagonist of all, and various are the in- stances which occur in ecclesiastical history of attempted coalitions. The Meletians of Africa united with the Arians against St. Athanasius ; the Semi-Arians of the Council of Sardica corresponded with the Donatists of Africa ; Nestorius received and protected the Pelagians ; 254 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. Aspar, the Arian minister of Leo the Emperor, favoured the Monophysites of Egypt ; the Jacobites of Egypt sided with the Moslem, who are charged with holding a Nestorian doctrine. It had been so from the beginning: "They huddle up a peace with all everywhere," says Tertullian. "for it maketh no matter to them, although they hold different doctrines, so long as they conspire together in their siege against the one thing, Truth." 1 And even though active co-operation was impracticable, at least hard words cost nothing, and could express that common hatred at all seasons. Accordingly, by Montanists, Catholics were called " the carnal ;" by Novatians, " the apostates;" by Valentinians, "the worldly;" byManichees, " the simple " by Aerians, " the ancient ;" ' by Apollinarians, "the man- worshippers j" by Origenists, " the flesh-lovers," and " the slimy ;" by the Nestorian s, *' Egyptians ;" by Monophysites, the " Chalcedonians :" by Donatists, " the traitors," and " the sinners," and " servants of Antichrist ;" and St. Peter's chair, " the seat of pestilence ;" and by the Luciferians, the Church was called "a brothel," "the devil's harlot," and " synagogue of Satan :" so that it might be called a Note of the Church, as I have said, for the use of the most busy and the most ignorant, that she was on one side and all other bodies on the other. 6. Yet, strange as it may appear, there was one title of the Church of a very different nature from those which have been enumerated, a title of honour, which all men agreed to give her, and one which furnished a still more simple direction than such epithets of abuse to aid the busy and the ignorant in finding her, and which was used by the 1 De Praeacr. Hser. 41, Oxfc tr. 2 x^i. SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 255 Fathers for that purpose. It was one which the sects could neither claim for themselves, nor hinder being enjoyed by its rightful owner, though, since it was the characteristic designation of the Church in the Creed, it seemed to surrender the whole controversy between the two parties engaged in it. Balaam could not keep from blessing the ancient people of Gdd ; and the whole world, heresies inclusive, were irresistibly constrained to call God's second election by its prophetical title of the " Catholic " Church. St. Paul tells us that the heretic is "condemned by himself;" and no clearer witness against the sects of the earlier centuries was needed by the Church, than their own testimony to this contrast between her actual position and their own. Sects, say the Fathers, are called after the name of their founders, or from their locality, or from their doctrine. So was it from the beginning : " I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas ;" but it was promised to the Church that she should have no mas ter upon earth, and that she should " gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad/' Her every-day name, which was understood in the market place and used in the palace, which every chance comer knew, and which state-edicts recognized, was the " Catho- lic" Church. This was that vry description of Chris- tianity in those times which we are all along engaged in determining. And it had been recognized as such from the first ; the name or the fact is put forth by St. Ignatius, St. Justin, St. Clement ; by the Church of Smyrna, St. Ireneeus, Ehodon or another, Tertullian, Origen, St. Cyprian, St. Cornelius ; by the Martyrs, Pionius, Sabina, and Asclepiades ; by Lactantius, Eusebius, Adimantius, St. Athanasius, St. Pacian, St. Optatus, St. Epiphanius, St Cyril, St. Basil, St. Ambrose, St. Chrysostom, St. Jerome, St. Augustine, and Facundus. St. Clement uses it as an argument against the Gnostics, St. Augustine against the 256 THE CHURCH O [CH. VI. Donatists and Manichees, St. Jerome against the Luci- ferians, and St. Pacian against the Novatians. 7. It was an argument for educated and simple. When St. Ambrose would convert the cultivated reason of Augustine, he bade him study the book of Isaiah, who is the prophet, as of the Messiah, so of the calling of the Gentiles and of the Imperial power of the Church. And when St. Cyril would give a rule to his crowd of Catechumens, " If ever thou art sojourning in any city/' he says, " inquire not simply where the Lord's house is, (for the sects of the profane also make an attempt to call their own dens houses of the Lord,) nor merely where the Church is, but where is the Catholic Church. For this is the peculiar name of this Holy Body, the Mother of us all, which is the Spouse of our Lord Jesus Christ." * " In the Catholic Church," says St. Augustine to the Manichees, " not to speak of that most pure wisdom, to the knowledge of which few spiritual men attain in this life so as to know it even in its least measure, as men, indeed, yet, without any doubt, (for the multitude of Christians are safest, not in understanding with quickness, but in believing with simplicity,) not to speak of this wisdom, which ye do not believe ' to be in the Catholic Church, there are many other considerations which most sufficiently hold me in her bosom. I am held by the consent of people and nations ; by that authority which began in miracles, was nourished in hope, was increased by charity, and made steadfast by age ; by that succession of priests from the chair of the Apostle Peter, to whose feeding the Lord after His resurrection commended His sheep, even to the present episcopate ; lastly, by the very title of Catholic, which, not without cause, hath this Church alone, amid so many Cat. iviii. 26. SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 257 heresies, obtained in such sort, that, whereas all heretics wish to be culled Catholics, nevertheless to any stranger, who asked where to find the ' Catholic ' Church, none of them would dare to point to his ow r n basilica or home. These dearest bonds, then, of the Christian Name, so many and such, rightly hold a man in belief in the Catholic Church, even though, by reason of the slowness of our understand- ing or our deserts, truth doth not yet show herself in her clearest tokens. But among you, who have none of these reasons to invite and detain me, I hear but the loud sound of a promise of the truth ; which truth, verily, if it be so manifestly displayed among you that there can be no mistake about it, is to be preferred to all those things by which I am held in the Catholic Church; but if it is promised alone, and not exhibited, no one shall move me from that faith which by so many and great ties binds my mind to the Christian religion."* When Adimantius asked his Marcionite opponent, how he was a Christian who did not even bear that name, but was called from Marcion, he retorts, " And you are called from the Catholic Church, therefore ye are not Christians either;" Adimantius answers, " Did we profess man's name, you would have spoken to the point ; but if we are called from being all over the world, what is there bad in this ? " 6 " Whereas there is one God and one Lord," says St. Clement, "therefore also that which is the highest in esteem is praised on the score of being sole, as after the pattern of the One Principle. In the nature then of the One, the Church, which is one, hath its portion, which they would forcibly cut up into many heresies. In substance then, and in idea, and in first principle, and in pre-eminence, we call the ancient Catholic Church sole ; in order to the unity of Contr. Ep. Mauich. 5. Origeu, Opp. t. i. p. 809. I 258 THE CHUKCH OF [CH. VI. one faith, the faith according to her own covenants, or rather that one covenant in different times, which, by the will of one God and through one Lord, is gathering together those who are already ordained, whom God hath predestined, having known that they would be just from the foundation of the world But of heresies, some are called from a man's name, as Valentine's heresy, Marcion's, and that of Basilides (though they profess to bring the opi- nion of Matthias, for all the Apostles had, as one teaching, so one tradition) ; and others from place, as the Peratiei ; and others from nation, as that of the Phrygians ; and others from their actions, as that of the Encratites ; and others from their peculiar doctrines, as the Docetae and Hematites ; and others from their hypotheses, and what they have honoured, as Cainites and the Ophites ; and others from their wicked conduct and enormities, as those Simonians who are called Eutychites." 6 " There are, and there have been," says St. Justin, " many who have taught atheistic and blasphemous words and deeds, coming in the name of Jesus ; and they are called by us from the appellation of the men whence each doctrine and opinion began . . . Some are called Marcians, others Valentinians, others Basilidians, others Saturnilians." ? " When men are called Phrygians, or Novatians, or Yalentinians, or Marcionites, or Anthro- pians," says Lactantius, "or by any other name, they cease to be Christians ; for they have lost Christ's Name, and clothe themselves in human and foreign titles. It is the Catholic Church alone which retains the true worship." 8 " We never heard of Petrines, or Paulines, or Bar- tholomeans, or Thaddeans," says St. Epiphanius; "but from the first there was one preaching of all the Apostles, not preaching themselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord. Wherefore also all gave one name to the Church, not their own, but that of their Lord Jesus Christ, since they 8 Strom, vii. 17. J c. Trypli. 35. 8 Jnstit. 4. 30. SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 259 began to be called Christians first at Antioch ; which is the Sole Catholic Church, having nought else but Christ's, being a Church of Christians ; not of Christs, but of Christians, He being One, they from that One being called Christians. None, but this Church and her preachers, are of this character, as is shown by their own epithets, Manicheans, and Simon ians, and Yalentinians, and Ebionites." 9 "If you ever hear those who are said to belong to Christ," says St. Jerome, "named, not from the Lord Jeeus Christ, but from some other, say Marcionites, Valentinians, Mountaineers, Campestrians, know that it is not Christ's Church, but the synagogue of Antichrist." l 9. St. Pacian's letters to the Novatian Bishop Sympronian require a more extended notice. The latter had required the Catholic faith to be proved to him, without distinctly stating from what portion of it he dissented; and he boasted that he had never found any one to convince him of its truth. St. Pacian observes that there is one point which Sympronian cannot dispute, and which settles the question, the very name Catholic. He then supposes Sympronian to object that, " under the Apostles no one was called Catholic." He answers, " Be it thus ; 3 it shall have been so ; allow even that. When, after the Apostles, heresies hud burst forth, and were striving under various names to tear piecemeal and divide 'the Dove' and 'the Queen ' of God, did not the Apostolic people require a name of their own, whereby to mark the unity of the people that was uncorrupted, lest the error of some should rend limb by limb ' the undefiled virgin ' of God ? Was it not seemly that the chief head should be distinguished by its own peculiar appellation ? Suppose this very day I entered a Hser. 42. p. 366. l In Lucif. fin. 8 The Oxford translation is used. 8 2 260 THE CHURCH OF [cH. VI. populous city. When I had found Marcionites, Apolli- narians, Cataphrygians, Novatians, and others of the kind, who call themselves Christians, by what name should I recognize the congregation of my own people, unless it were named Catholic? .... Whence was it delivered to me ? Certainly that which has stood through so many ages was not borrowed from man. This name ' Catholic ' sounds not of Marcion, nor of Apelles, nor of Montanus, nor does it take heretics for its authors/' In his second letter, he continues, " Certainly that was no accessory name which endured through so many ages. And, indeed, I am glad for thee, that, although thou mayest have preferred others, yet thou agreest that the name attaches to us, which should you deny nature would cry out. But and if you still have doubts, let us hold our peace. We will both be that which we shall be named." After alluding to Sympronian's remark that, though Cyprian was holy, "his people bear the name of Apostalicum, Cnpitolinum, or Synedriiim," which were some of the Novatian titles of the Church, St. Pacian replies, " Ask a century, brother, and all its years in suc- cession, whether this name has adhered to us ; whether the people of Cyprian have been called other than Catholic? No one of these names have I ever heard." It followed that such appellations were " taunts, not names," and there- lore unmannerly. On the other hand it seems that Sym- pronian did not like to be called a Novatian, though he could not call himself a Catholic. " Tell me yourselves," says St. Pacian, " what ye are called. Do ye deny that the Novatians are called from Novatian ? Impose on them whatever name you like; that will ever adhere to them. Search, if you please, whole annals, and trust so many ages. You will answer, ' Christian/ But if I inquire the genus of the sect, you will not deny that it is Novatian. . . . Confess it without deceit ; there is no wickedness in SECT. II.] TflE totJETfi CENlURf . the name. Why, when so often inquired for, do you hide yourself? Why ashamed of the origin of your name? When you first wrote, I thought you a Cataphrygian. . . . Dost thou grudge me my name, and yet shun thine own ? Think what there is of shame in a cause which shrinks from its own name." In a third letter : " ' The Church is the Body of Christ.' Truly, the body, not a member ; the body composed of many parts and members knit in one, as saith the Apos- tle, ' For the Body is not one member, but many.' Therefore, the Church is the full body, compacted and diffused now throughout the whole world ; like a city, I mean, all whose parts are united, not as ye are, Nova- tians, some small and insolent portion, and a mere swelling that has gathered and separated from the rest of the body. . . . Great is the progeny of the Virgin, and without number her offspring, wherewith the whole world is filled, wherewith the populous swarms ever throng the circum- fluous hive." And he founds this characteristic of the Church upon the prophecies: "At length, brother Syiu- pronian, be not ashamed to be with the many ; at length consent to despise these festering spots of the Novatians, and these parings of yours ; and at length to look upon the flocks of the Catholics, and the people of the Church extending so far and wide. . . . Hear what David saith, 'I will sing unto Thy name in the great congregation;' and again, ' I will praise Thee among much people ;* and ' the Lord, even the most mighty God, hath spoken, and called the world from the rising up of the sun unto the going down thereof.' What! shall the seed of Abraham, which is as the stars and the sand on the seashore for num- ber, be contented with your poverty ? . . . Recognize now, brother, the Church of God extending her tabernacles and fixing the stakes of her curtains on the right and on the left; understand that 'the Lord's name is praised fttfc CHtJECH 0* [CH. VI. from the rising up of the sun unto the going down thereof.'" 10. In citing these passages, I am not proving what was the doctrine of the Fathers concerning the Church in those early times, or what were the promises made to it in Scripture ; but simply ascertaining what, in matter of fact, was its then condition relatively to the various Chris- tian bodies among which it was found. That the Fathers were able to put forward a certain doctrine, that they were able to appeal to the prophecies, proves that matter of fact ; for unless the Church, and the Church alone, had been one body everywhere, they could not have argued on the supposition that it was so. And so as to the word " Catholic ;" it is enough that the Church was so called ; that title was a confirmatory proof and symbol of what is even otherwise so plain, that she, as St. Pacian explains the word, was everywhere one, while the sects of the day were nowhere one, but everywhere divided. Sects might, indeed, be everywhere, but they were in no two places the same ; every spot had its own independent communion, or at least to this result they were inevitably and continually tending. 11. St. Pacian writes in Spain : the same contrast between the Church and sectarianism is presented to us in Africa in the instance of the Donatisls; and St. Optatus is a witness both to the fact, and to its notoriety, and to the deep impressions which it made on all parties. Whether or not the Donatists identified themselves with the true Church, and cut off the rest of Christendom from it, is not the question here, nor alters the fact which I wish dis- tinctly brought out and recognized, that in those ancient SECT. II.] i'HE FOURTH CENTURA. 263 times the Church was that Body which was spread over the orbis terrarum, and sects were those bodies which were local or transitory. " What is that one Church," says St. Optatus, " which Christ calls f Dove ' and ' Spouse ' ? . . . It cannot be in the multitude of heretics and schismatics. If so, it follows that it is but in one place. Thou, brother Parmenian, hast said that it is with you alone ; unless, perhaps, you aim at claiming for yourselves a special sanctity from your pride, so that where you will, there the Church may be, and may not be, where you will not. Must it then be in a small portion of Africa, in the corner of a small realm, among you, but not among us in another part of Africa? And not in Spain, in Gaul, in Italy, where you are not ? And if you will have it only among you, not in the three Pannonian provinces, in Dacia, Moesia, Thrace, Achaia, Macedonia, and in all Greece, where you are not ? And that you may keep it among yourselves, not in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Pamphylia, Phrygia, Cilicia, in the three Syrias, in the two Armenias, in all Egypt, and in Mesopotamia, where you are not Y Not among such innumerable islands and the other provinces, scarcely numerable, where you are not ? What will become then of the meaning of the word Catholic, which is given to the Church, as being according to reason 8 and diffused every where ? For if thus at your pleasure you narrow the Church, if you withdraw from her all the nations, where will be the earnings of the Son of God ? where will be that which the Father hath so amply accorded to Him, saying in the second Psalm ' I will give thee the heathen for Thine inheri- tance and the uttermost parts of the earth for Thy posses- sion/ &c. ? . . The whole earth is given Him with the na- tions ; its whole circuit (orbis) is Christ's one possession." 4 s Rationdbilis ; apparently an allusion to tbe civil officer called Catho- licus or Sationalu, receiver -general. 4 Ad. Farm. ii. iuit. 264 TSB CHTTRCa [oH. VI. 12. An African writer contemporary with St. Augustine, if not St. Augustine himself, enumerates the small portions of the Donatists' Sect, in and out of Africa, and asks if they can be imagined to be the fulfilment of the Scripture promise to the Church. " If the holy Scriptures have assigned the Church to Africa alone, or to the scanty Cutzupitans or Mountaineers of Rome, or to the house or patrimony of one Spanish woman, however the argument may stand from other writings, then none but the Donatists have possession of the Church. If holy Scripture determines it to the few Moors of the Caesarean province, we must go over to the Rogatists : if to the few Tripoli- tans or Byzacenes and Provincials, the Maximianists have attained to it ; if in the Orientals or.ly, it is to be sought for among Arians, Eunomians, Macedonians, and others that may be there ; for who can enumerate every heresy of every nation ? But if Christ's Church, by the divine and most certain testimoniea of Canonical Scriptures, is assigned to all nations, whatever may be adduced, and from whatever quarter cited, by those who say, ' Lo, here is Christ and lo there,' let us rather hear, if we be His sheep, the voice of our Shepherd saying unto us, 'Do not believe.' For they are not each found in the many nations where she is ; but she, who is everywhere, is found where they are." 5 Lastly, let us hear St. Augustine himself again in the same controversy: "They do not communicate with us, as you say/' he observes to Cresconius, "Novatians, Arians, Patripassians, Valentinians, Patricians, Apellites, Marcionites, Ophites, and the rest of those sacrilegious names, as you call them, of nefarious pests rather than sects. Yet, wheresoever they are, there is the Catholic * De Unit. Kccles. 6. SECT. II.] Tflfi FOtJRTH CfiNTUfct. 265 Church; as in Africa it is where you are. On the other hand, neither you, nor any one of those heresies whatever, is to be found wherever is the Catholic Church. Whence it appears, which is that tree whose boughs extend over all the earth by the richness of its fruitfulness, and which be those broken branches which have not the life of the root, but lie and wither, each in its own place/* 6 13. It may be possibly suggested that this universality which the Fathers ascribe to the Catholic Church lay in its Apos- tolical descent, or again in its Episcopacy ; and that it was one, not as being one kingdom or civitas " at unity with itself," with one and the same intelligence in every part, one sympathy, one ruling principle, one organization, one communion, but because, though consisting of a number of independent communities, at variance (if so be) with each other even to a breach of communion, nevertheless all these were possessed of a legitimate succession of clergy, or all governed by Bishops, Priests, and Deacons. But who will in seriousness maintain that relationship, or that sameness of structure, makes two bodies one ? England and Prussia are both of them monarchies ; are they there- fore one kingdom ? England and the United States are from one stock ; can they therefore be called one state ? England and Ireland are peopled by different races; yet are they not one kingdom still ? If unity lies in the Apostolical succession, an act of schism is from the nature of the case impossible ; for as no one can rever.-e his parentage, so no Church can undo the fact that its clergy liave come by lineal descent from the Apostles. Either there is no such sin as schism, or unity does not lie in the Episcopal form or in the Episcopal ordination. And this is felt by the controversialists of this day ; who in consequence are 6 Coutr. Cresc. iv. 75 ; also iii. 77. 266 tfiE CHURCH Of [CH. VI. obliged to invent a sin, and to consider, not division of Church from Church, but the interference of Church with Church to be the sin of schism, as if local dioceses and bishops with restraint were more than ecclesiastical arrangements and by-laws of the Church, however sacred, while schism is a sin against her essence. Thus they strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel. Division is the schism, if schism there be, not interference. If interfer- ence is a sin, division which is the cause of it is a greater; but where division is a duty, there can be no sin in inter- ference. 14. Far different from such a theory is the picture which the ancient Church presents to us ; true, it was governed by Bishops, and those Bishops came from the Apostles, but it was a kingdom besides ; and as a kingdom admits of the possibility of rebels, so does such a Church involve sectaries and schismatics, but not independent portions. It was a vast organized association, co-extensive with the Roman Empire, or rather overflowing it. Its Bishops were not mere local officers, but possessed a quasi-ecumeni- cal power, extending wherever a Christian was to be found. " No Christian/' says Bingham, " would pretend to travel without taking letters of credence with him from his own bishop, if he meant to communicate with the Christian Church in a foreign country. Such was the admirable unity of the Church Catholic in those days, and the blessed harmony and consent of her bishops among one another." 7 St. Gregory Nazianzen calls St. Cyprian an universal Bishop, " presiding," as the same author presently quotes Gregory, " not only over the Church of Carthage and Africa, but over all the regions of the West, and over the East, and South, and Northern parts of the 7 Antiq. ii. 4, 5. BECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 267 world also." This is evidence of a unity throughout Chris- tendom, not of mere origin or of Apostolical succession, butof government. Bingham continues " [Gregory] says the same of Athanasius; that, in being made Bishop of Alexandria, he was made Bishop of the whole world. Chrysostom, in like manner, styles Timothy, Bishop of the universe The great Athanasius, as he returned from his exile, made no scruple to ordain in several cities as he went along, though they were not in his own diocese. And the famous Eusebius of Samosata did the like, in the times of the Arian. persecution under Valens. . . Epiphanius made use of the same power and privilege in a like case, ordaining Paulinianus, St. Jerome's brother, first deacon and then presbyter, in a monastery out of his own diocese in Palestine." 8 And so in respect of teaching, before Councils met on any large scale, St. Ignatius of Antioch had addressed letters to ihe Churches along the coast of Asia Minor, when on his way to martyrdom at Rome. St. Irenaous, when a subject of the Church of Smyrna, betakes himself to Gaul, and answers in Lyons the heresies of Syria. The see of St. Hippolytus, as if he belonged to all parts of the orbis terrarum, cannot be located, and ia variously placed in the neighbourhood of Rome and in Arabia. Hosius, a Spanish Bishop, arbitrates in an Alexandrian controversy. St. Athanasius, driven from his Church, makes all Christendom his home, from Treves to Ethiopia, and introduces into the West the discipline of the Egyptian Antony. St. Jerome is born in Dalmatia, studies at Constantinople and Alexandria, is secretary to St. Damasus at Rome, and settles and dies in Palestine. 8 Antiq. 5, 3. [Bingham apparently in this passage is indirectly reply- ing to the Catholic argument for the Pope's Supremacy drawn from the titles and acts ascribed to him in antiquity; but that argument is cumula- tive in character, being part of a whole body of proof ; and there is more- over a great difference between a rhetorical discourse and a synodal enuncia- tion as at Chalcedon.] 268 THE CHUECtt Of [cH. Vf. Above all the See of Rome itself is the centre of teaching as well as of action, is visited by Fathers and heretics as a tribunal in controversy, and by ancient custom sends her alms to the poor Christians of all Churches, to Achaia and Syria, Palestine, Arabia, Egypt, and Cappadocia, 15. Moreover, this universal Church was not only one ; it was exclusive also. As to the vehemence with which Chris- tians of the Ante-nicene period denounced the idolatries and sins of paganism, and proclaimed the judgments which would be their consequence, this is well known, and led to their being reputed in the heathen world as " enemies of mankind." "Worthily doth God exert the lash of His stripes and scourges," says St. Cyprian to a heathen magistrate ; " and since they avail so little, and convert not men to God by all this dreaclfulness of havoc, there abides beyond the prison eternal and the ceaseless flame and the everlasting penalty. . . . Why humble yourself and bend to false gods ? Why bow your captive body before helpless images and moulded earth ? Why grovel in the prostration of death, like the serpent whom ye worship? Why rush into the downfall of the devil, his fall the cause of yours, and he your companion? .... Believe and live ; you have been our persecutors in time; in eternity, be companions of our joy." 9 " These rigid sentiments, " says Gibbon, "which had been unknown to the ancient world, appear to have infused a spirit of bitterness into a system of love and harmony." l Such, however, was the judgment passed by the first Christians upon all who did not join their own society ; and such still more was the judgment of their successors on those who lived and died in the sects and heresies which had issued from it. That very Father, whose denunciation of the heathen has just been quoted, 9 Ad Demetr. 4, &c. Oxf. Tr. l Hist. ch. iv. SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CKNTURY. 269 had already declared it even in the third century. " He who leaves the Church of Christ/' he says, " attains not to Christ's rewards. He is an alien, an outcast, an enemy. He can no longer have God for a Father, who has not the Church for a Mother. If any man was able to escape who remained without the Ark of Ncah, then will that man escape who is out of doors beyond the Church. . . What sacrifice do they believe they celebrate, who are rivals of the Priests ? If such men were even killed for confession of the Christian name, not even by their blood is this stain washed out. Inexplicable and heavy is the sin of discord, and is purged by no suffering . . . They cannot dwell with God who have refused to be of one mind in God's Church ; a man of such sort may indeed be killed, crowned he cannot be." 2 And so again St. Chrysostom, in the follow- ing century, in harmony with St. Cyprian's sentiment: " Though we have achieved ten thousand glorious acts, yet shall we, if we cut to pieces the fulness of the Church, suffer punishment no less sore than they who mangled His body." 3 In like manner St. Augustine seems to consider that a conversion from idolatry to a schismatical communion is no gain. " Those whom Donatists baptize, they heal of the wound of idolatry or infidelity, but inflict a more grievous stroke in the wound of schism ; for idolaters among God's people the sword destroyed, but schismatics the gaping earth devoured." * Elsewhere, he speaks of the "sacrilege of schism, which surpasses all wickednesses. " s St. Optatus, too, marvels at the Donatist Farmenian's inconsistency in maintaining the true doctrine, that " Schismatics are cut off as branches from the vine, are destined for punishments, and reserved, as dry wood, for hell-fire." 6 "Let us hate them who are worthy of hatred," says St. Cyril, " withdraw we from those whom 2 DC Unit. 5, 12. 3 Chrys. in Eph. iv. 4 De Baptism, i. 10. * c. Ep. Farm. i. 7. De Schism. Donat. i. 10. 270 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. God withdraws from ; let us also say unto God with all boldness concerning all heretics, ' Do not I hate them, Lord, that hate thee ? ' " 7 " Most firmly hold, and doubt in no wise," says St. Fulgentius, " that every heretic and schismatic soever, baptized in the name of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, unless aggregated to the Catholic Church, how great soever have been his alms, though for Christ's Name he has even shed his blood, can in no wise be saved." * The Fathers ground this doctrine on St. Paul's words that, though we have knowledge, and give our goods to the poor, and our body to be burned, we are nothing without love. 9 16. One more remark shall be made : that the Catholic teachers, far from recognizing any ecclesiastical relation as existing between the Sectarian Bishops and Priests and their people, address the latter immediately, as if those Bishops did not exist, and call on them to come over to the Church individually without respect to any one besides; and that because it is a matter of life and death. To take the instance of the Donatists : it was nothiug to the purpose that their Churches in Africa were nearly as numerous as those of the Catholics, or that they had a case to produce in their controversy with the Catholic Church ; the very fact that they were separated from the orbis terrarum was 1 Cat. xvi. 10. 8 De Fid. ad Petr. 39. [82.] * [Of course this solemn truth must not be taken apart from the words of the present Pope, Pius IX., concerning invincible ignorance : " Notum nobis vobisque est, eos, qui invincibili circa sanctissimam nostrain religionem ignoranti& laborant, quique iiaturalcm legem ejusque prsecepta in omnium cordibus a Deo insculpta sedulo servantes, ac Deo obedire parati, honestam rectamque vitam agunt, posse, divinje lucis et gratiae operante virtute, seternam consequi vitam, cum Deus, qui omuiura mentes, aniuios, cogita- tiones, habitusque plane intuetur, scrutatur et noscit, pro summa sua- bonitate et dementia, minime patiatur quempiam seternis puniri suppliciis, qui voluntaries culpze reatum non habeat."] SECT. II.] THE FOURTH CENTURY. 271 a public, a manifest, a simple, a sufficient argument against them. " The question is not about your gold and silver," says St. Augustine to Glorius and others, "not. your lands, or farms, nor even your bodily health is in peril, but we address your souls about obtaining eternal life and fleeing eternal d^ath. Rouse yourself therefore You see it all, and know it, and groan over it ; yet God sees that there is nothing to detain you in so pestiferous and sacrilegious a separation, if you will but overcome your carnal affection, for the obtaining the spiritual kingdom, and rid yourselves of the fear of wounding friendships, which will avail nothing in God's judgment for escaping eternal punishment. Go, think over the matter, consider what can be said in answer. . . . No one blots out from heaven the Ordinance of God, no one blots out from earth the Church of God : He hath promised her, she hath filled, the whole world." " Some carnal intimacies," he says to his kinsman Severinus, " hold you where you are. . . . What avails temporal health or relationship, if with it we neglect Christ's eternal heritage and our perpetual health ? " "I ask," he says to Celer, a person of influence, " that you would more earnestly urge upon your men Catholic Unity in the region of Hippo." " Why," he says, in the person of the Church, to the whole Donatist population, " Why open your ears to the words of men, who say what they never have been able to prove, and close them to the word of God, saying, 'Ask of Me, and I will give Thee the heathen for Thine inheritance'?" At another time he says to them, " Some of the presbyters of your party have sent to us to say, ' Retire from our flocks, unless you would have us kill you/ How much more justly do we say to them, ' Nay, do you, not retire from, but come in peace, not to our flocks, but to the flocks of Him whose we are all ; or if you will not, and are far from peace, then do you rather retire from flocks, for which Christ shed His 272 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. Blood.' " " I call on you for Christ's sake," he says to a late pro-consul, "to write me an answer, and to urge gently and kindly all your people in the district of Sinis or Hippo into the communion of the Catholic Church." He publishes an address to the Donatists at another time to inform them of the defeat of their Bishops in a conference : " Whoso," he says, "is separated from the Catholic Church, however laudably he thinks he is living, by this crime alone, that he is separated from Christ's Unity, he shall not have life, but the wrath of God abideth on him/' "Let them believe of the Catholic Church/' he writes to some converts about their friends who were still in schism, " that is, to the Church diffused over the whole world, rather what the Scriptures say of it than what human tongues utter in calumny." The idea of acting upon the Donatists only as a body and through their bishops, does not appear to have occurred to St. Augustine at all. 1 17. On the whole, then, we have reason to say, that if there be a form of Christianity at this day distinguished for its careful organization, and its consequent power; if it is spread over the world ; if it is conspicuous for zealous maintenance of its own creed; if it is intolerant towards what it considers error ; if it is engaged in ceaseless war with all other bodies called Christian ; if it, and it alone, is called " Catholic " by the world, nay, by those very bodies, and if it makes much of the title ; if it names them heretics, and warns them of coming woe, and calls on them one by one, to come over to itself, overlooking every other tie ; and if they, on the other hand, call it seducer, harlot, apostate, Antichrist, devil ; if, however much they differ one with another, they consider it their common enemy ; if they strive to unite together against it, and cannot ; if they > Epp. 43, 52, 57, 76, 105, 112, 141, 144. SECT. III.] THB FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 273 are but local ; if they continually subdivide, and it remains one ; if they fall one after another, and make way for new sects, and it remains the same; such a religious commu- nion is not unlike historical Christianity, as it comes before us at the Nicene Era. SECTION III. THE CHURCH OF THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. The patronage extended by the first Christian Emperors to Arianism, its adoption by the barbarians who succeeded to their power, the subsequent expulsion of all heresy beyond the limits of the Empire, and then again the Monophysite tendencies of Egypt and part of Syria, changed in some measure the aspect of the Church, and claim our further attention. It was still a body in posses- sion, or approximating to the possession, of the orbis terrarum ; but it was not simply intermixed with sectaries, as we have been surveying it in the earlier periods, rather it lay between or over against large schisms. That same vast Association, which, and which only, had existed from the first, which had been identified by all parties with Chris- tianity, which had been ever called Catholic by people and by laws, took a different shape ; collected itself in far greater strength on some points of her extended territory than on others ; possessed whole kingdoms with scarcely a rival ; lost others partially or wholly, temporarily or for good ; was stemmed in its course here or there by external obstacles ; and was defied by heresy, in a substantive shape and in mass, from foreign lands, and with the sup- port of the temporal power. Thus not to mention the Arianism of the Eastern Empire in the fourth century, the whole of the West was possessed by the same heresy in. T 274 THE CHURCH 01T [CH. VI. the fifth ; and nearly the whole of Asia, east of the Euphrates, as far as it was Christian, by the Nestorians, in the centuries which followed ; while the Monophysites had almost the possession of Egypt, and at times of the whole Eastern Church. I think it no assumption to call Arian- ism, Nestorianism, and Eutychianism heresies, or to identify the contemporary Catholic Church with Chris- tianity. Now, then, let us consider the mutual relation of Christianity and heresy under these circumstances. 1 . The Arians of the Gothic Race. No heresy has started with greater violence or more sudden success than the Arian ; and it presents a still more remarkable exhibition of these characteristics among the barbarians than in the civilized world. Even among the Greeks it had shown a missionary spirit. Theophilus in the reign of Constantius had introduced the dominant heresy, not without some promising results, to the Sabeans of the Arabian peninsula; but under Valens, Ulphilas became the apostle of a whole race. He taught the Arian doc- trine, which he had unhappily learned in the Imperial Court, first to the pastoral Moesogoths ; who, unlike the other branches of their family, had multiplied under the Moesian mountains with neither military nor religious triumphs. The Visigoths were next corrupted ; by whom does not appear. It is one of the singular traits in the history of this vast family of heathens that they so in- stinctively caught, and so impetuously communicated, and so fiercely maintained, a heresy, which had excited in the Empire, except at Constantinople, little interest in the body of the people. The Visigoths are said to have been converted by the influence of Valens ; but Valens reigned for only fourteen years, and the barbarian population which had been admitted to the Empire amounted to SECT. III.] THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 275 nearly a million of persons. It is as difficult to trace how the heresy was conveyed from them to the other barbarian tribes. Gibbon seems to suppose that the Visigoths acted the part of missionaries in their career of predatory war- fare from Thrace to the Pyrenees. But such is the fact, however it was brought about, that the success in arms and the conversion to Arianism, of Ostrogoths, Alani, Suevi, Vandals, and Burgundians stand as concurrent events in the history of the times ; and by the end of the fifth century the heresy had been established by the Visigoths in France and Spain, in Portugal by the Suevi, in Africa by the Vandals, and by the Ostrogoths in Italy. For a while the title of Catholic as applied to the Church seemed a misnomer ; for not only was she buried beneath these populations of heresy, but that heresy was one, and maintained the same distinctive tenet, whether at Carthage, Seville, Toulouse, or Ravenna. 2. It cannot be supposed that these northern warriors had attained to any high degree of mental cultivation ; but they understood their own religion enough to hate the Catholics, and their bishops were learned enough to hold disputations for its propagation. They professed to stand upon the faith of Ariminum, administering Baptism under an altered form of words, and re- baptizing Catholics whom they gained over to their sect. It must be added that, whatever was their cruelty or tyranny, both Goths and Vandals were a moral people, and put to shame the Catholics whom they dispossessed. " What can the pre- rogative of a religious name profit us," says Salvian, " that we call ourselves Catholic, boast of being the faith- ful, taunt Goths and Vandals with the reproach of an heretical appellation, while we live in heretical wicked- T 2 276 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. ness P " The barbarians were chaste, temperate, just, and devout; the Visigoth Theodoric repaired every morning with his domestic officers to his chapel, where service was performed by the Arian priests ; and one singular instance is on record of the defeat of a Visigoth force by the Imperial troops on a Sunday, when instead of preparing for battle they were engaged in the religious services of the day. 8 Many of their princes were men of great ability, as the two Theodorics, Euric and Leovigild. 3. Successful warriors, animated by a fanatical spirit of re- ligion, were not likely to be content with a mere profession of their own creed; they proceeded to place their own priests in the religious establishments which they found, and to direct a bitter persecution against the vanquished Catholics. The savage cruelties of the Vandal Hunueric in Africa have often been enlarged upon ; Spain was the scene of repeated persecutions ; Sicily, too, had its Martyrs. Compared with these enormities, it was but a little thing to rob the Catholics of their churches, and the shrines of their treasures. Lands, immunities, and jurisdictions, which had been given by the Emperors to * De Gubern. Dei, vii. p. 142. Elsewhere, " Apud Aquitanicos quso civitaa in locupletissima nc nobilissim& sui parte uon quasi lupanar fuit ? Quis potentum ac divitum non in luto libidinis vixit ? Hand innltmn inatrona abest a. vilitate servarum, ubi paterfamilias ancillarnm maritua est? Qnis antem Aquitanorum divitum non hoc fuit ?" (pp. 131, 135.) " Offenduntur barbari ip.Vi impuritatibus nostris. Esse inter Gotbos non licet scortatorem Gotbum ; soli inter cos pracjudieio nationia ac nominis permittuntur impuri esse Komani" (p. 137). "Quid? Hispanias uonne vel eadem vel majoi-a forsitan vitia perdidenint ? . . . Accessit boc ad manifestandnm illic impudicitiaj daniuationcm, ut Wandalis potissimum, id eat, pudicis barbaris traderentur " (p. 137). Of Africa and Carthage, " In urbe Christiana, in urbe ecclesiastica, . . . viri in semetipsU feuiinas pro- fitebantnr," &c. (p. 152). * Dunham, Hist. Spain, vol. i. p. 112. SECT. III.] THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 277 the African Church, were made over to the clergy of its conquerors ; and by the time of Belisarius, the Catholic Bishops had been reduced to less than a third of their original number. In Spain, as in Africa, bishops were driven from their sees, churches were destroyed, cemeteries profaned, martyries rifled. When it was possible, the Catholics concealed the relics in caves, keeping up a per- petual memory of these provisional hiding-places. 4 Re- peated spoliations were exercised upon the property of the Church. Leovigild applied 5 its treasures partly to increas- ing the splendour of his throne, partly to national works. At other times, the Arian clergy themselves must have been the recipients of the plunder : for when Childebert the Frank had been brought into Spain by the cruelties exer- cised against the Catholic Queen of the Goths, who was his sister, he carried away with him from the Arian churches, as St. Gregory of Tours informs us, sixty chalices, fifteen patens, twenty cases in which the gospels were kept, all of pure gold and ornamented with jewels. 8 4. In France, and especially in Italy, the rule of the here- tical power was much less oppressive; Theodoric, the Ostrogoth, reigned from the Alps to Sicily, and till the close of a long reign he gave an ample toleration to his Catholic subjects. He respected their property, suffered their churches and sacred places to remain in their hands, and had about his court some of their eminent Bishops, since known as Saints, St. Caesarius of Aries, and St. Epiphanius of Pavia. Still he brought into the country a new population, devoted to Arianism, or, as we now speak, a new Church. " His march," says Gibbon, 7 " must be considered as the emigration of an entire 4 Aguirr. Concil. t. 2, p. 191. * Dunham, p. 125. JJist, Franc. Uj. 10. 7 Ch. 8$>. 278 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. people ; the wives and children of the Goths, their aged parents, and most precious effects, were carefully trans- ported; and some idea may be formed of the heavy luggage that now followed the camp by the loss of two thousand waggons, which had been sustained in a single action in the war of Epiras." To his soldiers he assigned a third of the soil of Italy, and the barbarian families settled down with their slaves and cattle. The original number of the Vandal conquerors of Africa had only been fifty thousand men, but the military colonists of Italy soon amounted to the number of two hundred thousand; which, according to the calculation adopted by the same author elsewhere, involves a population of a million. The least that could be expected was, that an Arian ascendency established through the extent of Italy would provide for the sufficient celebration of the Arian worship, and we hear of the Arians having a Church even in Rome. 8 The rule of the Lombards in the north of Italy succeeded to that of the Goths, Arians, like their predecessors, without their toleration. The clergy whom they brought with them seem to have claimed their share in the possession of the Catholic churches ; 9 and though the Court was converted at the end of thirty years, many cities in Italy were for some time afterwards troubled by the presence of heretical bishops. 1 The rule of Arianism in France lasted for eighty years ; in Spain for a hundred and eighty ; in Africa for a hundred ; for about a hundred in Italy. These periods were not con- temporaneous ; but extend altogether from the beginning of the fifth to the end of the sixth century. 5. It will be anticipated that the duration of this ascen- Greg. Dial. iii. 30. Ibid. 20. 1 Gibbon, Hist. ch. 8?. SECT. III.] THE FIFTH AND SIXTH UKNTURIES. 279 dency of error had not the faintest tendency to deprive the ancient Church of the West of the title of Catholic ; and it is needless to produce evidence of a fact which is on the very face of the history. The Arians seem never to have claimed the Catholic name. It is more remarkable that the Catholics during this period were denoted by the additional title of " Romans." Of this there are many proofs in the histories of St. Gregory of Tours, Victor of Vite, and the Spanish Councils. Thus, St. Gregory speaks of Theodegisilus, a king of Portugal, expressing his incre- dulity at a miracle, by saying, " It is the temper of the Romans, (for/' interposes the author, " they call men of our religion Romans,) and not the power of God." 3 "Heresy is everywhere an enemy to Catholics/' says the same St. Gregory in a subsequent place, and he proceeds to illustrate it by the story of a "Catholic woman," who had a heretic husband, to whom, he says, came " a presbyter of our religion very Catholic ;" and whom the husband matched at table with his own Arian presbyter, " that there might be the priests of each religion " in their house at once. When they were eating, the husband said to the Arian, " Let us have some sport with this presbyter of the Romans." s The Arian Count Gomachar, seized on the lands of the Church of Agde in France, and was attacked with a fever; on his recovery, at the prayers of the Bishop, he repented of having asked for them, observ- ing, "What will these Romans say now? lhat my fever came of taking their land." * When the Vandal Theo- doric would have killed the Catholic Armogastes, after failing to torture him into heresy, his presbyter dis- suaded him, " lest the Romans should begin to call him a Martyr." 5 De Glor. Mart. i. 25. Ibid. 80. 4 Ibid. 79. * Viet. Vit. i. 14. >j& THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. 6. This appellation had two meanings ; one, which will readily suggest itself, is its use in contrast to the word " barbarian," as denoting the faith of the Empire, as " Greek " occurs in St. Paul's Epistles. In this sense it would more naturally be used by the Romans themselves than by others. Thus Salvian says, that " nearly all the Romans are greater sinners than the barbarians ;" 6 and he speaks of " Roman heretics, of which there is an innume- rable multitude," 7 meaning heretics within the Empire. And so St. Gregory the Great complains, that he " had become Bishop of the Lombards rather than of the Romans." 8 And Evagrius, speaking even of the East, contrasts " Romans and barbarians " 9 in his account of St. Simeon ; and at a later date, and even to this day, Thrace and portions of Daciaand of Asia Minor derive their name from Rome. In like manner, we find Syrian writers some- times speaking of the religion of the Romans, sometimes of the Greeks, 1 as synonymes. 7. But the word certainly contains also an allusion to the faith and communion of the Roman See. In this sense the Emperor Theodosius, in his letter to Acacius of Bercea, contrasts it with Nestorianism, which was within the Empire as well as Catholicism ; during the controversy raised by that heresy, he exhorts him and others to show themselves "approved priests of the Roman religion/' 1 Again when the Ligurian nobles were persuading the Arian Ricimer to come to terms with Anthemius, the orthodox representative of the Greek Emperor, 3 they propose to him to send St. Epiphanius as ambassador, a De Gab 1). iv. p. 73. * Ibid. v. p. 88. Epp. i. 31. Hist. vi. 23. ' Cf . Assem. t. i. p. 351, not. 4, t. 3, p. 393. 2 Baron. Ann. 432, 47. Gibbon, Hist ch. 30. SECT. IH.J THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 281 man " whose life is venerable to every Catholic and Roman, and at least amiable in the eyes of a Greek (Grceculus) if he deserves the sight of him." 4 It must be recollected, too, that the Spanish and African Churches actually were in the closest union with the See of Rome at that time, and that that intercommunion was the visible ecclesiastical distinction between them and their Arian rivals. The chief ground of the Yandal Hunneric's persecution of the African Catholics seems to have been their connexion with their brethren beyond the sea/ which he looked at with jealousy, as introducing a foreign power into his territory. Prior to this he had published an edict calling on the " Ho- moiisian " Bishops (for on this occasion he did not call them Catholic), to meet his own bishops at Carthage and treat concerning the faith, that " their meetings to the seduction of Christian souls might not be held in the provinces of the Vandals." 6 Upon this invitation, Eugenius of Carthage replied, that all the transmarine Bishops of the orthodox communion ought to be summoned, " in particular because it is a matter for the whole world, not special to the African provinces," that " they could not undertake a point of faith sine universitatis asscnsu." Hunneric answered that if Eugenius would make him sovereign of the orlis tcrrarum, he would comply with his request. This led Eugenius to say that the orthodox faith was "the only true faith;" that the king ought to write to his allies abroad, if he wished to know it, and that he himself would write to his brethren for foreign bishops, " who," he says, " may assist us in setting before you the true faith, common to them and to us, and especially the Roman Church, which is the head of all Churches." Moreover, the African Bishops in their banishment in Sardinia, to the number of sixty, with St. Fulgentius at their head, quote with approbation the Baron. Ann. 471, 18. Viet. Vit. iv. 4. Viet. Vit. i. 315, 282 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI. words of Pope Hormisdas, to the effect that they hold, " on the point of free will aud divine grace, what the Roman, that is, the Catholic, Church follows and preserves." 7 Again, the Spanish Church was under the superintendence of the Pope's Vicar 8 during the persecutions, whose duty it was to hinder all encroachments upon " the Apostolical decrees, or the limits of the Holy Fathers," through the whole of the country. 8. Nor was the association of Catholicism with the See of Rome an introduction of that age. The Emperor Gratian, in the fourth century, had ordered that the Churches which the Arians had usurped should be restored (not to those who held " the Catholic faith," or " the Nicene Creed," or were " in communion with the orbis terraruin") but " who chose the communion of Damasus," 9 the then Pope. It was St. Jerome's rule, also, in some well-known passages : Writing against Ruffinus, who had spoken of " our faith," he says, " What does he mean by ' his faith ' ? that which is the strength of the Roman Church ? or that which is contained in the volumes of Origen? If he answer, 'The Roman/ then we are Catholics who have borrowed nothing of Origen's error ; but if Origen's blas- phemy be his faith, then, while he is charging me with inconsistency, he proves himself to be an heretic." : The other passage, already quoted, is still more exactly to the point, because it was written on occasion of a schism. The divisions at Antioch had thrown the Catholic Church into a remarkable position ; there were two Bishops in the See, one in connexion with the East, the other with Egypt and the West, with which then was " Catholic Communion " ? St. Jerome has no doubt on the subject : 1 Aguirr. Cone. t. 2, p. 262. 9 Aguirr. ibid. p. 232. 9 Tbeo4. Hist. v. g. I c. Huff. \. 4. SECT. III.] THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 283 Writing to St. Damasus, he says, "Since the East tears into pieces the Lord's coat, . . . therefore by me is the chair of Peter to be consulted, and that faith which is praised by the Apostle's mouth. . . . Though your great- ness terrifies me, yet your kindness invites me. From the Priest I ask the salvation of the victim, from the Shepherd the protection of the sheep. Let us speak without offence ; I court not the Roman height : I speak with the suc- cessor of the Fisherman and the disciple of the Cross. I, who follow none as my chief but Christ, am associated in communion with thy blessedness, that is, with the See of Peter. On that rock the Church is built, I know. Whoso shall eat the Lnmb outside that House is profane .... I know not Vitalis " (the Apollinarian), " Meletius I reject, I am ignorant of Paulinus. Whoso gathereth not with thee, scattereth ; that is, he who is not of Christ is of Antichrist." 2 Again, " The ancient authority of the monks, dwelling round about, rises against me ; I mean- while cry out, If any be joined to Peter's chair he is mine." 3 9. Here was what may be considered a dignm vindice nodus, the Church being divided, and an arbiter wanted. Such a case had also occurred in Africa in the controversy with the Donatists. Four hundred bishops, though but in one region, were a fifth part of the whole Episcopate of Christendom, and might seem too many for a schism, and in themselves too large a body to be cut off from God's inheritance by a mere majority, even had it been over- whelming. St. Augustine, then, who so often appeals to the or bis terrarum, sometimes adopts a more prompt crite- rion. He tells certain Donatists to whom he writes, that the Catholic Bishop of Carthage " was able to make light ' Ep. 15. * Ep. 1Q, 284 THE CHTJBCH OP [CH. VI. of the thronging multitude of his enemies, when he found himself by letters of credence joined both to the Roman Church, in which ever had flourished the principality of the Apostolical See, and to the other lands whence the gospel came to Africa itself." ' There are good reasons then for explaining the Gothic and Arian use of the word " Roman," when applied to the Catholic Church and faith, of something beyond its mere connexion with the Empire, which the barbarians were assaulting ; nor would " Roman " surely be the most obvious word to denote the orthodox faith, in the mouths of a people who had learned their heresy from a Roman Emperor and Court, and who professed to direct their belief by the great Latin Council of Ariminum. 10. As then the fourth century presented to us in its ex- ternal aspect the Catholic Church lying in the midst of a multitude of sects, all enemies to it, so in the fifth and sixth we eee the same Church lying in the West under the oppression of a huge, farspreading, and schismatical communion. Heresy is no longer a domestic enemy inter- mingled with the Church, but it occupies its own ground and is extended over against her, even though on the same territory, and is more or less organized, and cannot be so promptly refuted by the simple test of Catholicity. 2. The Ncsiorians. The Churches of Syria and Asia Minor were the most intellectual portion of early Christendom. Alexandria was but one metropolis in a large region, and contained the philosophy of the whole Patriarchate ; but Syria abounded in wealthy and luxurious cities, the creation of the Seleucidae, where the arts and the schools of Greece 4 Aug. Epp. 43. 7. SECT. 111.] THE FIFT11 AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 285 had full opportunities of cultivation. For a time too, for the first two hundred years, as some think, Alexandria was the only See as well as the only school of Egypt; while Syria was divided into smaller dioceses, each of which had at first an authority of its own, and which, even after the growth of the Patriarchal power, received their respective bishops, not from the See of Antioch, but from their own metropolitan. In Syria too the schools were private, a circumstance which would tend both to diversity in religious opinion, and incaution in the expres- sion of it ; but the sole catechetical school of Egypt was the organ of the Church, and its Bishop could banish Origen for speculations which developed and ripened with im- punity in Syria. 2. But the immediate source of that fertility in heresy, which is the unhappiness of the ancient Syrian Church, was its celebrated Exegeticul School. The history of that School is summed up in the broad characteristic fact, on the one hand that it devoted itself to the literal and critical interpretation of Scripture, and on the other that it gave rise first to the Arian and then to theNestorian heresy. If additional evidence be wanted of the connexion of heterodoxy and biblical criticism in that age, it is found in the fact that, not long after this coincidence in Syria, they are found combined in the person of Theodore of lleraclea, so called from the place both of his birth and his bishoprick, an able commentator and an active enemy of St. Athanasius, though a Thracian unconnected except by sympathy with the Patriarchate of Antioch. The Antiochene School appears to have risen in the middle of the third century ; but there is no evidence to determine whether it was a local institution, or, as is more probable, a discipline or method characteristic generally of 286 THE CHURCH OP [CH. VI- Syrian teaching. Dorotheas is one of its earliest luminaries ; he is known as a Hebrew scholar, as well as a commenta- tor on the sacred text, and he was the master of Eusebius of Ceesarea. Lucian, the friend of the notorious Paul of Samosata, and for three successive Episcopates, after him separated from the Church though afterwards a martyr in it, was the author of a new edition of the Septuagirit, and master of the chief original teachers of Arianism. Eusebius of Caesarea, Asterius called the Sophist, and Eusebius of Emesa, Arians of the Nicene period, and Diodorus, a zealous opponent of Arianism, but the master of Theodore of Mopsuestia, have all a place in the Exegetical School. St. Chrysostom and Theodoret, both Syrians, and the former the pupil of Diodorus, adopted the literal interpre- tation, though preserved from its abuse. But the princi- pal doctor of the School was that Theodore, the master of Nestorius, who has just above been mentioned, and who, with his writings, and with the writings of Theodoret against St. Cyril, and the letter written by Ibas of Edessa to Maris, was condemned by the fifth Ecumenical Council. Ibas was the translator into Syriac, and Maris into Persian, of the books of Theodore and Diodorus ; s and thus they became immediate instruments in the formation of the great Nestorian school and Church in farther Asia. As many as ten thousand tracts of Theodore are said in this way to have been introduced to the knowledge of the Christians of Mesopotamia, Adiabene, Babylonia, and the neighbouring countries. He was called by those Churches absolutely " the Interpreter," and it eventually became the very profession of the Nestorian communion to follow him as such. " The doctrine of all our Eastern Churches/' Bay s their Council under the Patriarch Marabas, ' is founded on the Creed of Nicsea ; but in the exposition of the Scriptures we follow St. Theodore." "We must by all 6 Assem. iii. p. 68. 8ECT. III.] THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 287 means remain firm to the commentaries of the great Commentator," says the Council under Sabarjesus ; " whoso shall in any manner oppose them, or think other- wise, be he anathema." 6 No one since the beginning of Christianity, except Origen and St. Augustine, has had so great literary influence on his brethren as Theodore. 7 3. The original Syrian School had possessed very marked characteristics, which it did not lose when it passed into a new country and into strange tongues. Its comments on Scripture seem to have been clear, natural, methodical, apposite, and logically exact. "In all Western Aramaea," says Lengerke, that is, in Syria, " there was but one mode of treating whether exegetics or doctrine, the prac- tical." 8 Thus Eusebius of Caesarea, whether as a dis- putant or a commentator, is commonly a writer of sense and judgment ; and he is to be referred to the Syrian school, though he does not enter so far into its temper as to exclude the mystical interpretation or to deny the verbal inspiration of Scripture. Again, we see in St. Chrysostom a direct, straightforward treatment of the sacred text, and a pointed application of it to things and persons ; and Theodoret abounds in modes of thinking and reasoning which without any great impropriety may be called English. Again, St. Cyril of Jerusalem, though he does not abstain from allegory, shows the character of his school by the great stress he lays upon the study of Scripture, and, I may add, by the peculiar characteristics of his style, which will be appreciated by a modern reader. 4. It would have been well, had the genius of the Syrian 5 Ibid. t. 8, p. 84, note 3. 7 \Vegueru, Prolog, in TLeod. Opp. p. in. 8 De Ephrem Syr. p. 61. 288 THE CHURCH OF [CH. VI. theology been ever in the safe keeping of men such as St. Cyril, St. Chrysostom, and Theodoret ; but in Theodore of Mopsuestia, nay in Diodorus before him, it developed into those errors, of which Paul of Samosata had been the omen on its rise. As its attention was chiefly directed to the examination of the Scriptures, in its interpretation of the Scriptures was its heretical temper discovered ; and though allegory can be made an instrument for evading Scripture doctrine, criticism may more readily be turned to the destruction of doctrine and Scripture together. Theodore was bent on ascertaining the literal sense, an object with which no fault could be found: but, leading him of course to the Hebrew text instead of the Septua- gint, it also led him to Jewish commentators. Jewish commentators naturally suggested events and objects short of evangelical as the fulfilment of the prophetical an- nouncements, and, when it was possible, an ethical sense instead of a prophetical. The eighth chapter of Proverbs ceased to bear a Christian meaning, because, as Theodore maintained, the writer of the book had received the gift, not of prophecy, but of wisdom. The Canticles must be interpreted literally ; and then it was but an easy, or rather a necessary step, to exclude the book from the Canon. The book of Job too professed to be historical ; yet what was it really but a Gentile drama ? He also gave up the books of Chronicles and Ezra, and, strange to say, the Epistle of St. James, though it was contained in the Peschito Version of his Church. He denied that Psalms 22 and 69 [21 and 68] applied to our Lord ; rather he limited the Messianic passages of the whole book to four ; of which the eighth Psalm was one, and the forty-fifth [44] another. The rest he explained of Hezekiah and Zerub- babel, without denying that they might be accommodated to an evangelical sense. 1 He explained St. Thomas's, 1 Lengerkc, de Eplireui. Syr. pp. 73 75. SECT. III.] THE FIFTH AND SIXTH CENTURIES. 289 words, " My Lord and my God," as an exclamation of joy, and our Lord's " Receive ye the Holy Ghost/' as an an- ticipation of the day of Pentecost As may be expected he denied the verbal inspiration of Scripture. Also, he held that the deluge did not cover the earth; and, as others before him, he was heterodox on the doctrine of original sin, and denied the eternity of punishment. 5. Maintaining that the real sense of Scripture was, not the scope of a Divine Intelligence, but the intention of the mere human organ of inspiration, Theodore was led to hold, not only that that sense was one in each text, but that it was continuous and single in a context; that what was the subject of the composition in one verse must be the subject in the next, and that if a Psalm was historical or prophetical in its commencement, it was the one or the other to its termination. Even that fulness, of meaning, refinement of thought, subtle versatility of feeling, and delicate reserve or reverent suggestiveness, which poets exemplify, seems to have been excluded from his idea of a sacred composition. Accordingly, if a Psalm contained passages which could not be applied to our Lord, it followed that that Psalm did not properly apply to Him at all, except by accommodation. Such at least is the doctrine of Gosmas, a writer of Theodore's school, who on this ground passes over the twenty-second, sixty-ninth, and other Psalms, and limits the Messianic to the second, the eighth, the forty-fifth, and the hundred and tenth. " David," he says, " did not make common to the servants what belongs to the Lord 1 Christ, but what was proper to the Lord he spoke of the Lord, and what was proper to the servants, of servants." 1 Accordingly the twenty- * St