THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 LOS ANGELES
 
 ADDRESSED /'< ' 
 
 s of Culture 
 
 PROF. FRAXZ DEL1TZSCH. 
 
 Translated from the (.jt 
 
 !>y the 
 e v. IV ILL I A M C. I) A L A A' D. 
 
 Alfred Centre, N. Y.: 
 
 The American Subbath Tract Society. 
 
 1890,
 
 ADDRESSED TO 
 
 s of Culture 
 
 BY 
 
 PROF. FRANZ DELITZSCH. 
 
 Translated from the German 
 
 by the 
 Rev. WILLIAM C. D A L A N D. 
 
 Alfred Centre, N. Y.: 
 
 The American Sabbath Tract Society. 
 
 1690.
 
 ENTER F.D ACCORDING TO ACT 07 CONGRESS, 
 
 IN THE YEAR 1890, BY 
 .THE AMERICAN SABBATH TRACT SOCIETY, 
 
 TN THE OFFICE OF THE 
 LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS, AT WASHINGTON.
 
 ' 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 No apology is necessary for presenting: to the pub- 
 lic an English translation of this most excellent of tracts- 
 Already but about two years before the world in the Ger- 
 man language, it has won the respectful attention of both 
 Jewish and Christian thinkers everywhere, and has proven 
 itself to be the best text-book for Jewish catechumens. 
 This translation appeared in volume II. of The Peculiar Peo- 
 ple, and it is now issued as a separate pamphlet in the hope 
 that thereby in this newer garb it may continue its gracious 
 work among the English speaking Jews. 
 
 
 
 That God, who has so lately removed from us the la- 
 mented author, may vouchsafe His blessing upon Israel 
 and raise up for His chosen people many friends, to whom 
 the life of Franz Delitzsch may be an inspiration to noble 
 endeavor in this cause, is the earnest prayer of 
 
 THE TRANSLATOR. 
 
 1965955
 
 ADDRESSED TO HEBREWS OF CULTURE. 
 
 Beloved Hebreiv Readers, If, as I hope, you know me as 
 a Christian scholar who is a friend of Israel, you will 
 understand that in inviting you to a religious meditation, 
 I am anxious to put myself in your place and realize your 
 mode of thinking. I shall take nothing for granted except 
 that upon which we are both agreed, and offer you only 
 cogent reasons capable of producing irresistible conviction. 
 
 There is a God. Such is your belief as well as mine. 
 We are bound to believe it. In vain do atheists and 
 epicureans strive to escape from it. It is of the essential 
 nature of our spirit to trace every effect to some cause, and 
 as we climb this ladder of conclusions higher and higher, 
 we arrive at last at a being who is the cause of all causes, 
 the last cause of the universe, a being independent of 
 everything, and on whom everything is dependent, a being 
 to whom everything which exists owes its origin. The uni- 
 verse without God is but a blind monster. History with- 
 out God is nothing but confusion, without rhyme or rea- 
 son. And there is but one God. Two or three highest 
 beings side by side are impossible; one only can be the 
 highest. But this one God, on whom man depends in every 
 breath, and whose glory the heavens declare, wants to be 
 acknowledged and praised to the exclusion of all else. 
 Among all the truths to which our reason must yield, 
 there is none higher than this, that God is one; and among 
 all the duties incumbent upon creatures endowed with 
 reason, there is none higher than this, that they give glory 
 to the One God only. 
 
 I admit to you, my dear Jewish readers, frankly, that 
 the Christian religion would be a false religion if it gave 
 up or tampered with the belief that God is one. In that
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 case, the Jewish religion would have comparatively a 
 stronger claim than the Christian religion to ascribe to 
 tself the destiny of becoming the universal religion. For 
 our chief weapon against heathenism is the declaration 
 that the gods of the heathen are but deified creatures, and 
 that the true, living God is One, even the Creator of heaven 
 and earth. Neither am I inclined to withhold from you 
 the admission that Christian worship, sometimes, by its 
 ceremonies and prayers seems. to contradict the confession 
 of faith in one God. 
 
 The Reformation has done away with some of the 
 abuses and errors which bear the stamp of heathenism, 
 because they curtail the glory of the one God. The Refor- 
 mation has laid down the principle, that the doctrine and 
 practice of the church is ever liable to the test of the words 
 of Scripture. The creeds of the Reformers, designate the 
 holy books of the Old and New Testaments as " the pure 
 sources of Israel," to which the church must ever have re- 
 course to formulate by them its doctrine and to regulate by 
 them its life. The Israel of the Old Testament, too, has to 
 judge of the merits of the New Testament religion by the 
 documents of that religion, and the church has not the right to 
 force upon Israel the Christian religion in this or that historical 
 garb. 
 
 On the other hand, the Israelite who wishes to have a 
 true conception of the Christian faith, is bound not to be 
 guided by accidental impressions or second-hand hear-say, 
 but to search for what Jesus and his apostles affirm. He 
 will then find that the fundamental principle of the unity 
 of God, which proves the incomparable superiority of the 
 religion of Israel over all religions of antiquity, is, in the 
 New Testament, too, acknowledged as the supreme truth. 
 When one of the scribes, as related in Mark 12: 2, 29, 
 asked Jesus, " Which is the first commandment of all?" 
 He answered: " The first of all the commandments is: ' Hear, 
 O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord." And in Luke 18: 
 18, 19 we read : "A certain ruler asked him, saying : Good 
 Master, What shall I do to inherit eternal life?" to which 
 the answer of Jesus was : * Why callest thou me good?
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 7 
 
 None is good save one, that is, God." And in the prayer he 
 offers to his Father before his crucifixion, he says, (John 
 17: 3), "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee 
 the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent." 
 And like an echo of this word of Jesus is what Paul writes 
 in i Cor. 8: 6, "To us there is but one God, the Father, of 
 whom are all things, and we in him, and one Lord Jesus 
 Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him." Such 
 declarations concerning the only one God run through the 
 whole New Testament. " But," it will be objected, "you 
 believe in God as triune." Certainly, but if the "trinity" 
 excluded the "unity," we would give up the trinity and 
 stand by the unity. 
 
 We believe in God, and in God's Son, and in God's Holy 
 Spirit, just as you believe in God, and in his " Shechinah " 
 and in his Holy Spirit. The essence of God is one, but 
 threefold is the revelation of that essence. Even in the 
 sacred history of the Old Testament he gives a threefold 
 revelation of himself. But, for the present, we will not 
 further touch upon that. 
 
 For our further discussion I shall take nothing for 
 granted except that we are agreed on the existence of God. 
 and on the unity of God. 
 
 IF God is the creator of the world, He is also its pre- 
 server and governor. And if man is free to give to his 
 actions this or that direction, he is also morally responsi- 
 ble. Both those things are self-evident. And since there 
 are free beings in the world, the history of the world can- 
 not follow the same laws as govern the material universe. 
 There is a law in the natural world, and there is a moral 
 order in history in accordance with a higher law. The 
 attitude of men towards God is determining the attitude 
 of God towards men. And because men, in their estrange- 
 ment from God and in the misery of sin, cannot save them- 
 selves, God, who is not only just but, before all things, mer- 
 ciful and gracious, interposes and provides means of salva- 
 tion for man, and substitutes mercy for justice in the case 
 of all who do not reject His proffered help.
 
 S SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 Such a means of salvation was the call of Abraham 
 away from his idolatrous surroundings to make him 
 prophet of the one living God for his house and all the 
 world. "Get thee out of thy country and from thy kin- 
 dred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will 
 show thee. And I will make of thee a great nation, and I 
 will bless thee, and make thy name great, and thou shalt 
 baa blessing." Gen. 12: 1,2. In these divine words Abra- 
 ham is called to become a channel of blessing, a fountain 
 from which far-reaching streams of blessings are to flow. 
 Whether people participate in the blessing conveyed 
 through Abraham or not depends upon the attitude they 
 assume towards him, as stated in the third verse of the 
 chapter cited above, "And I will bless them that bless thee, 
 and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all fami- 
 lies of the earth be blessed." Such was God's will, design, 
 and promise which came through Abraham, upon Isaac, 
 Jacob and the people descended from them. 
 
 The patriarchs were not without sinful weaknesses, and 
 the people of Israel had a natural inclination towards hea- 
 thenism, as is evident by their repeated yielding to the fasi- 
 nation of the idolatrous worship of their neighbors. But 
 in so far as Israel and their ancestors proved themselves 
 true servants and preachers of the one living God, and of 
 His counsel and will, in so far has God, who shapes history 
 according to his plan of salvation, demanded that His 
 human instruments be obediently acknowledged by those 
 who came under their influence as having a divine mission. 
 
 The patriarchal form of revealed religion was followed 
 by the Law of Moses, and this latter by the Messianic reve- 
 lation. When Jesus was baptized by John in Jordan, and 
 again when He was transfigured upon the mountain, 
 "there came a voice out of the cloud saying: This is my 
 beloved Son, hear him." Luke 9: 35. This divine witness 
 declares him to be the Prophet like unto Moses, concerning 
 whom we read the solemn words of warning exhortation": 
 "And it shall come to pass that'whosoever will not hearken 
 unto my words which he shall speak in my name. I will re- 
 quire it of him." Deut. 18: 19. It declares Him to be the
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 9 
 
 Servant of Jehovah of whom God, in the word of prophecy, 
 says, " Behold my servant, whom I uphold, mine elect in 
 whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him; 
 he shall bring- forth judgment to the Gentiles " (Isaiah 42 : 
 i); /. <?., it is He whom God has appointed that through Him 
 the religion of Israel shall become the religion of the world. 
 He is the " Son " of whom it is said in the second Psalm: 
 " Kiss the Son lest He -(the Lord God) be angry, and ye 
 perish from the way." For as we read in John 3: 35, 36^ 
 " The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into 
 his hand. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting 
 life; and he that believeth not the Son, shall not see life, 
 but the wrath of God abideth on him." And He himself 
 in His sermon on the Mount demands faith, living faith, 
 confession of the heart and life, for on that day He will say 
 to all who only outwardly subject themselves to Him, " I 
 never knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity." 
 Matt. 7: 23. 
 
 These are mighty words, which even a Jewish hearer 
 ought not to leave unheeded. May not this Jesus be, after 
 all, the man whom God has appointed as the instrument 
 to complete the channel of salvation begun by Abraham and 
 continued by Moses? Of the success which Abraham's proc- 
 lamation of the one true God had beyond the limits of 
 his own household, we do not read anything; on the con- 
 trary, in Egypt and Philistia he himself made all success 
 impossible by his unfaithful conduct. Neither have Moses 
 and the people of Israel done anything to convert the 
 heathen world from its dead idols to the living God. Even 
 among the prophets there is .but one, namely, Jonah, who 
 was sent to the great Empire-city to preach repentance 
 there, and he did it only reluctantly, yielding to a divine 
 compulsion. But apostolic preaching emanating from 
 Jesus has destroyed the heathenism of the Roman Empire, 
 so that Julian the Apostate tried in vain to resuscitate it. 
 True, the mission of the Christian religion in Inter centu- 
 ries has not come up in its effect to the first centuries, in 
 which the first impulse given by Jesus himself was more 
 strongly felt. True, the Christian religion has, by admit-
 
 10 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 ting all kinds of strange errors, weakened its own original 
 energy. Yet even the later centuries have had successes 
 in the heathen world to which nothing that Judaism has 
 done can be compared. And whenever the Christian re- 
 ligion has found entrance it has permeated the intellectual, 
 social and political life with power and progress, and has 
 created a new era in the world's history. 
 
 But in the Talmud this Jesus is reviled as a bastard, 1 
 the son of criminal intercourse between a certain Pandera 
 with the virgin Mary, and we are told that He was with 
 Joshua Ben Perachia (who, however, lived a century before 
 Jesus) in Egypt, and that He there so misconducted Him- 
 self that He was solemnly excommunicated. His miracles 
 are explained as a consequence ot his having hidden, in an 
 incision in his flesh, certain formulas of witchcraft obtained 
 in Egypt. Instead of the twelve apostles five disciples are 
 enumerated, and to each one a name is given indicating 
 his deserving to be cut off. Jesus Himself, we are told, was 
 hung at Lydda as a seducer of the people, and is deservedly 
 suffering greater punishment than Balaam, seeing that He 
 it is terrible to have to write it is being sodden in a lake 
 
 of . Do not reply that you have never read 
 
 anything like it in the Talmud. The censor of former days 
 has struck out such passages. But there are books in which 
 those condemned passages " like jewels and pearls " are 
 collected and reserved from oblivion. 
 
 Must there not be something rotten in the Talmudical 
 Judaism which harbors such a hatred against Jesus? May 
 it not be true concerning Jesus as concerning Abraham, 
 " I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that 
 curseth thee? " Those revilings read like the insane rav- 
 ings of those who had drunk of the cup of the divine 
 wrath. 
 
 Neither, I pray you, reply that this contempt for the 
 person of Jesus is owing to His having called Himself the 
 Son of God and to His having assumed a relationship to- 
 wards God which is incompatible with the unity of God. 
 
 nnnn nsim pnj (2 -MSB (i
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 11 
 
 For at all events, there remains His moral purity, His 
 spiritual grandeur, His world-renewing power, before 
 which the greatest modern thinkers bow down, their free- 
 thinking propensities notwithstanding. " I consider the 
 Gospels" Goethe said on the nth of March, 1832 ''thor- 
 oughly genuine, for there is active in them a reflex of 
 nobility which emanated from the power of Jesus, and is of 
 as divine a nature as has ever been experienced on earth. 
 If I am asked whether my nature allows me to adore Him 
 with reverence, I answer: Most certainly! I bow before Him 
 as the highest revelation of the loftiest principle of 
 morality." And Carlyle certainly not a Christian in the 
 strict ecclesiastical sense says somewhere: "If you ask 
 me up to what height has humanity reached in religion? 
 I say, look upon our Divine symbol, Jesus of Nazareth' 
 and His life and His biography. Higher than that human 
 mind has never risen." 
 
 There are in Israel, too, noble individuals who speak 
 approximately in the same strain. In the writings of 
 Leopold Kompert and Karl Emil Franzos we come across 
 beautiful acknowledgements of the pure and holy humanity 
 of Jesus, though they do not draw the conclusion that the 
 Christian religion is a higher religious platform than Juda- 
 ism. We are glad even of this approach to right apprecia- 
 tion. He who does not curse him is close to blessing Him 
 and to being blessed by the God whose " Shechinah " He is. 
 
 THE time is past, or ought to be past, when hatred of 
 the Jews looked upon every one of the Jewish nation as 
 having had part in the putting to death of Jesus, and 
 thought to do service to God, if it inflicted upon them con- 
 dign punishment for that awful deed. It has been forgot- 
 ten that at the time of the crucifixion there were Jewish 
 communities in all three continents who knew nothing of 
 the activity of Jesus in Palestine, nor of his death. But, 
 on the other hand, it is as vain to try to deny or to mini- 
 mize the guilt of the Jews in reference to the crucifixion. 
 Thus, Philippson, in his pamphlet " Have the Jews crucified 
 Jesus ?" tries to whitewash the Jews in the same way in
 
 12 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 which the tribunals of the inquisition ascribed the murder 
 of the heretics they had condemned to death to the action 
 of the civil power. And Graetz, after having described, as 
 he thinks with the impartiality of an -historian, the person 
 and work of Jesus, says when coming to the crucifixion: 
 " Such was the end of the man who had worked for the 
 moral improvement of his people and had perhaps become 
 the victim of a misunderstanding-." Perhaps! That is to 
 say, the saying of Jesus in which He called Himself the Son 
 of God was perhaps understood in a sense different from 
 what was involved. But we are of the opinion that the 
 proceedings at the condemnation of Jesus were indeed up- 
 roarious, that the laws were not minutely observed, and 
 that the appeal to Pilate: " If thou let this man go, thou art 
 not Caesar's friend; whosoever maketh himself a king 
 speaketh against Csesar" (John 19: 12) was a piece of deceit 
 practiced upon the.cowardice of the procurator. But apart 
 from this, we admit that this Jesus, who in His sermon 
 on the Mount went so far as to criticise even the Decalogue 
 and to oppose to it His own words, saying: " But I say unto 
 you," who called Himself not only the Son of God but Lord 
 of the Sabbath, and declared such rabbinical ordinances 
 as washing of hands before meals as worthless, we admit 
 I say, that this Jesus could not but appear, from this point 
 of view of Pharisaic legality, as guilty of death; for trans- 
 gression of legal ordinances designed to protect the Law 
 from being broken is, according to' traditional maxims a 
 capital offense (Erubin 21 b), and such a teacher was to be 
 executed at the time of the feast. (Sanhedrin n, 4). But 
 still the killing of Jesus was, when looked at from a higher 
 point of view, judicial murder. The justice which carried 
 out the letter of the law was a crying injustice. For the 
 absolutely perfect purity of the person of Jesus, the over 
 whelming spiritual power of His declarations, and the 
 miracles of mercy in which God owned and acknowledged 
 Him, ought to have lifted His opponents above the platform 
 of rigorous legality. This legality, in nailing the Holy One 
 of God to the cross, has pronounced judgment against it- 
 self. Just as Paul, who, before his conversion, consenting
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 13 
 
 to the stoning of Stephen, proceeded against the disciples 
 of our Lord with threatenings and slaughter, learned by 
 his own doings of what criminal cruelty Pharisaic fanati- 
 cism is capable; and just as he says in Gal. 2: 19, " I through 
 the law am dead to the law " just so the religion of the 
 law, in delivering up to death on the cross the Founder of 
 the New Covenant promised by the prophet, has borne tes- 
 timony to its own miserable erroneous narrowness and 
 sealed its own downfall. 
 
 We are far from considering every individual Israelite 
 of later times living out of Palestine as responsible for the 
 legal proceedings on that decisive occasion. But, consid- 
 ering that if any people, through common origin, common 
 religion, ceremonial law and history is a compact unity, it 
 is the Jewish people, according to the proverb: "All are re- 
 sponsible for one another," 1 we cannot escape from the 
 conclusion that the delivering up of Jesus to the Romans 
 as one guilty of a capital offense is a national guilt resting 
 upon the Jewish people; and when we read in the prophet 
 that Israel in the latter days will smite his breast in 
 repentance, and will lament as a fearful crime the killing 
 of a servant of the Lord who had been shamefully mis- 
 judged, we cannot escape the question of our conscience 
 whether, after all, Jesus was not the victim of this unfor- 
 tunate blindness. 
 
 " I will pour upon the house of David " we read in 
 the Book of Zechariah, 12: 10 13: i "and upon the inhab- 
 itants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications, 
 and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and 
 they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only 
 son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in 
 bitterness for his first-born. In that day shall there be a 
 great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Had- 
 adrimmon in the valley of Megiddon. And the land shall 
 rnourn, every family apart; the family of the house of 
 David apart, and their 'wives apart; the family of the 
 house of Nathan apart, and their wives apart; 
 
 .173
 
 14 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 the family of the house of Levi apart, and their 
 wives apart; the family of Shimei apart, and their wives 
 apart. All the families that remain, ever)- family apart, 
 and their wives apart. In that day there shall be a fount- 
 ain opened to the house of David, and to the inhabitants 
 of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness." It is anational 
 mourning as was once that for the beloved king Josiah 
 who had been mortally wounded on the battle field of Me- 
 giddon. The royal house in its principal branch, as well 
 as in its lateral branches (David, Nathan); the priestly 
 family, in its principal branches and its lateral 
 branches, (Levi, Shimei) all will mourn, and not 
 only they but all families existing at that future 
 time of Israel's great repentance. The special em- 
 phasis laid upon the mourning of the women shows 
 that the prophet does not speak of a mere national political 
 concern, but that he describes a matter affecting man's 
 relationship to God wherein duties and rights belong to 
 men and women alike. But who is this Pierced One whose 
 piercing the Lord God considers as a crime committed 
 against Himself ? 
 
 " Whom they have pierced " it might be thought that 
 not His own people, but the heathen are described as those 
 who pierced Him. But in the book of the Prophet Isaiah 
 we learn that the innocent Servant of the Lord was per- 
 secuted by His own people for whom He sacrificed Himself. 
 " I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them 
 that plucked off the hair; I hid not my face from shame 
 and spitting." Isa. 50: 6. 
 
 He came unto His own, and His own received Him not- 
 And yet the time is to come in which they would rec- 
 ognize as their Saviour Him whom they had misjudged, 
 hated with a deadly hatred, and persecuted. " Surely, he 
 hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did 
 esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But 
 he was wounded for our- transgressions, he was bruised for 
 our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon 
 him; and with his stripes we are healed." Isa. 53 : 4, 5. 
 
 Who is this pierced one? Surely not Israel! For
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. I 5 
 
 Israel, as a nation, confesses here that he had deemed Him 
 smitten of God who for Israel's sake had taken upon Him- 
 self suffering unto death, just as Job had been deemed by 
 his three friends to be an exceptionally great sinner be- 
 cause of his abnormally great trials. If the Servant of the 
 Lord who has been misjiidged by His people is the per- 
 sonification of a multitude, He can personify only those 
 who have labored for the salvation of their people and 
 sacrificed their lives to that labor. Such a servant of the 
 Lord was Jeremiah, who, according to trustworthy reports, 
 suffered martyrdom in Egypt at the hands of its people. 
 But this Jeremiah, or any other like him, was only a type 
 of that incomparably great Sufferer, who was consumed by 
 His zeal for the house of God, and who interceded for His 
 benighted people when he gave up the ghost on the cross. 
 When Pilate wanted to release Him, but was hindered by 
 force, the fanatical multitude took all the responsibility 
 upon itself, crying : " His blood be on us and on our 
 children." Matt. 27 : 25. Is it, after all, this blood-guilti- 
 ness which will be felt by the Jewish people hereafter as 
 a burden upon heart and conscience too heavy to bear is 
 that, after all, the national sin for which, when it once 
 comes to the faith, it will ask and receive forgiveness? 
 
 One of the last words of Jesus addressed to His people 
 as He was concluding His public activity was: "O Jeru- 
 salem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and 
 stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I 
 have gathered thy children together, even as ahengather- 
 eth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!. Be- 
 hold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto 
 you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say. 
 Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord." Matt. 
 23 : 37-39. Brethren of the house of Israel, you know the 
 view of your ancestors : "The curse of a wise man, even 
 though unjustly pronounced, is effectual." 1 (Berachoth 
 56 a.) This is an extravagant idea, for an unjustifiable 
 curse, though pronounced by the greatest scholar, is -vain 
 
 XT! Ljm i'SS DDD np (1
 
 16 SOLEMN QUHbl IONS. 
 
 breath. But that a threat out of the mouth of a man liv- 
 ing in God and speaking" out of communion with God is 
 not without effect has been confirmed by experience. And 
 seeing that that threat of Jesus was followed, four decades 
 after, by the burning of the Temple and dissolution of the 
 Jewish commonwealth, does there not seem to be a con- 
 nection between the threat and the occurrence of the 
 threatened disaster? 
 
 In the " Sayings of the Fathers" {Aboth. 5, 9), among 
 the chief sins causing " Galuth," /'. e., expulsion from the 
 native country, is enumerated the "shedding of blood." 1 
 The innocent blood with which king Manasseh filled Jeru- 
 salem, from end to end, filled up the measure of sin for 
 which the exile to Babylon was the punishment. But that 
 exile lasted only, in round numbers, 70 years, whilst now 
 the Jewish people has, for 1800 years, been deprived of its 
 country. Yet that country which since the time of Ves- 
 pasian and Titus has been under foreign dominion has 
 been promised, yea sworn, to Israel as an eternal posses- 
 sion. How is that to be explained? Only two reasons 
 are possible. Either that promise which runs through all 
 parts of the Old Testament, belongs to the region of myth- 
 ical accounts, or the conduct of Israel, these 1800 years, 
 has made it impossible for God to re-instate them in the 
 promised possession. The prophets have forseen this long 
 expatriation. When those who have been dispersed in all 
 directions recognize the cause and repent, they shall, ac- 
 cording to Deut. 30: 1-8, have restored to them the land of 
 their inheritance. 
 
 But are not the prayers of the Synagogue especially 
 those of New Year, Day of Atonement and the interven- 
 ing days,' 2 ) full of deep acknowledgement of sin and touch- 
 ing appeals to the mercy of God? 
 
 Yes. it is true; but the duration of these many centuries 
 of exile is inexplicable without the assumption that there 
 rests upon this poor people, in spite of its heart-rending 
 
 iron rvs.v (1 
 .C'S- : :: 2
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 17 
 
 cries to God, the ban of unacknowledged sin which hin. 
 ders God from relieving its misery. 
 
 HE who accepts the Christian religion as the continua- 
 tion and consummation of Israel's religion will find this 
 view amply affirmed in the Law, the Prophets and the 
 Hagiographa. But these confirmations are no proofs for 
 the outsider; and in putting questions to the conscience of 
 the Jewish reader, I pass by all pleas which are without 
 cogency for him who has not yet accepted the Christian 
 faith. I will base my. arguments upon suppositions which 
 are accepted both by the believing Israelite and the be^ 
 lieving Christian, and chiefly upon these two assumptions: 
 firstly, that there is a history of God's revelation, /'. <?., of 
 God's free acts and communications by which he has inter- 
 rupted the natural course of things; and, secondly, that 
 prophecy is an effect of divine revelation, not being the 
 result of natural combination, but having proceeded from 
 divine illumination. 
 
 If there is no history of divine revelation, Anti-semit-- 
 ism is right in asserting that Israel's consciousness of be- 
 ing the chosen people of God, destined to communicate to 
 the world God's revelation, is nothing but the vanity of a- 
 conceited national pride. And if there is no prophecy 
 resting upon the inspiration of the Spirit of God, all the 
 facts in which the Christian religion recognizes the fulfill-- 
 ment of Old Testament prophecies, as, for instance, that 
 the good Shepherd in the book of Zechariah was given by" 
 the ungrateful people as Jtiis price, thirty pieces of silver, 
 and that thirty pieces of silver, the reward of betrayal on 
 the part of Judas Iscariot, are the mere play of chance. 
 The Israelite who adopts such a position rejects the Chris- 
 tian religion at the cost of depriving his own religion of 
 its divine basis he is a "denier of the first cause," 1 un- 
 dermining and cutting up the divine root of the Jewish 
 and Christian religion alike. 
 
 But supposing that we, my Jewish reader and myself, 
 
 .-,pj'3 ^SID (1
 
 IS SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 are agreed in recognizing the hand of God in history and 
 prophecy, I shall carefully avoid what has often been done, 
 namely, to make use of passages in the Prophets, the ex- 
 planation of which is of a disputable character. I shall not 
 adduce Gen. 49: 10 as proof that Shiloh (the Messiah,) is 
 to come at a time when Judah shall have lost the regal do- 
 minion. I consider this explanation wrong, and the fulfill- 
 ment, supposing the explanation could be admitted, would 
 not be correct, for Jesus appeared in the time of the domin- 
 ion of the Herodean dynasty. That dynasty was, indeed, 
 of Edomitic origin, but, according to religious profession, 
 it was Jewish. According to Sofa, 41 a, when King Agrip- 
 pa wept in reading Deut. 17:15, "One from among thy 
 brethren shalt thou set king over thee," the people tried to 
 comfort him by shouting, " You are our brother!" ' and in- 
 deed he was their brother, the Edomites having been, two 
 hundred years before, by circumcision, incorporated into 
 the Jewish nation when the Hasmonean -king, John Hyr- 
 canus, conquered them. Still less is it possible to prove 
 from the seventy weeks in the gth chapter of the book of 
 Daniel, that Jesus is the Messiah, because after He had been 
 removed, and Jerusalem afterward destroyed, seven and 
 sixty-two weeks, i. e., sixty-nine times seven years had 
 elapsed. In the first instance " Messiah " 2 may be the le- 
 gal title of the high priest, who was violently removed, and 
 secondly, the backward calculation of four hundred and 
 eighty-three years brings us to no event of real import- 
 ance which might serve as a starting point. 
 
 Daniel's seventy weeks are an enigma which awaits 
 yet its solution, because it has been found that Antiochus 
 Epiphanes was not yet the final arch-enemy of the people 
 of God, and after his removal it was not yet the final redemp- 
 tion which was brought about, but only a prelude to it. 
 
 Prophetic foresight of the distant future is subject to 
 the law of perspective. The end appears side by side with 
 the immediate future, but when the latter is reached there 
 appears between it and tne end an expanse of time. What 
 
 . (2 .nnx p^ns nn ;rns
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 19 
 
 in the perspective seemed shrunk together is now widely 
 extended. The prophets of the time of the exile connected 
 with the end of the captivity, and the faithful believers in 
 the time of the Selucidae connected with the end of the tyr- 
 anny of Antiochus Epiphanes extraordinary hopes, which, 
 when these respective consummations occurred, were only 
 imperfectly fulfilled. This is by no means derogatory to 
 the value of prophecy; it is simply God's order that the 
 look into the distant, and the look into the immediate fut- 
 ure the divine and the human should be combined in it. 
 
 In one point the prophets of the time of the exile are 
 -agreed; they knew only two temples, that of Solomon, the 
 first house? which the Chaldseans destroyed, and a post-exilic 
 temple, the second house? The temple described by Ezekiel 
 is not a third temple of stone which is to be erected at the 
 nd of time, when the second temple shall have met with 
 the same fate as the first (a fate nowhere foretold), but it 
 is an ideal for the realization of which the post-exilic 
 prophet hoped, when Israel shall have repented (Ezek. 43: 
 10, n), and all his tribes, and with renewed first love re- 
 turned to the land of their fathers, a condition which was 
 not fulfilled. Chapters 40 to 48, of the book of Ezekiel, are 
 an unfulfilled prophecy. On account of their disagreement 
 with the pre-exilic and post-exilic order of divine service 
 they are for the synagogue an unsolved riddle, so that their 
 explanation is a task reserved for Elijah. 3 On their account 
 the whole book of Ezekiel was in danger of being declared 
 apocryphal; but a certain Chanania, with a store of three 
 hundred barrels of oil, retired to his study and happily ex- 
 plained away all the contradictions against the Law. (Cha- 
 13 a.) Such is the assertion, but nowhere do we find 
 samples of their supposed reconciliation, nor does this tem- 
 ple anywhere appear as the goal of Israel's hope. In fact, 
 there is no such thing as a third temple mentioned by Eze- 
 kiel; there is a second temple, as it was to be according to 
 Ezekiel's conception, but it was never really built. 
 
 When by permission of Cyrus, a number of exiles under 
 
 .iyt} rp3 (2 .p^x-i rvs (1 
 .rum 1 ? FP7K -pnj 11 nuns (3
 
 20 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 Zerubbabel, the prince, and Joshua, the high priest, had 
 returned to their fatherland, the foundation of a new tem- 
 ple was laid, in 534 B. C., the second year after the return- 
 The building was soon interrupted, but was resumed in 520 
 B. C., the second year of the reign of Darius Hystaspes. In 
 this year, the second of the reign of Darius, was it that 
 Haggai and Zechariah began to preach. These both proph- 
 esy that the beginning of the Messianic time would occur 
 in the time of this temple. " The glory of this latter house," 
 we read in Haggai 2: 9, " shall be greater than of the form- 
 er, saith the Lord of hosts; and in this place will I give 
 peace, saith the Lord of hosts." 
 
 And in Zechariah 3: 8, we read: " Hear now, O Joshua, 
 the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit with thee, 
 for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring- 
 forth my servant, THE BRANCH." From the time that Isaiah 
 4: 2, Jeremiah 23:5, and 33: 15, were written, THE BRANCH 
 had been the name of the Messiah, as of the branch of 
 David which was to grow from lowliness to glory, and to 
 spread around him everywhere salvation and glory. 
 
 In the 6th chapter of Zechariah we read that the prophet 
 was to make " crowns and set them upon the head of Josh- 
 ua, the son of Josedech, the high priest," that he may rep- 
 resent in a picture what was to come: "Behold the man 
 whose name is THE BRANCH, and he shall grow up out of 
 his place (his home), and he shall build the temple of the 
 Lord; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule 
 upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne; 
 and the counsel of peace shall be between them both (viz., 
 the high priest and the king, /. <?., the two offices now sep- 
 arated from. one another)." 
 
 At the time when this prophecy was spoken the build- 
 ing of the second temple had been resumed by permission 
 of Darius. It was easy to see that it would be far behind 
 the Solomonic temple in magnificence. But it is endowed 
 with all the more glorious promises. It is to be the abode of 
 peace; the Prince of Peace, king and priest in one person, 
 after the order of Melchizedek, is to appear in the time of 
 this temple. In the sixth year of Darius, in 506 B. C., the
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 21 
 
 building \vas finished. Under these circumstances, the 
 temple which THE BRANCH builds, the Son of David, the 
 ultimate fulfillment of the promise given in 2 Samuel 7, can 
 be no third temple of stone. History moves forward, not 
 backward. But what kind of temple was he to build? If 
 Jesus is the Messiah, we have an intimation regarding it 
 in the answer Jtie gives after having cast out of the temple 
 the money-changers and those that sold sacrificial animals, 
 to those who wanted to know what authority He had for 
 His actions. That answer was an enigma even to His dis- 
 ciples. " Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise 
 it up." John 2: 19. Here, too, the temple which was to come 
 in place of the post-exilic temple restored by Herod, is 
 certainly not one of stone. 
 
 Supposing the temple which THE BRANCH was to build 
 was to be one of stone, \ve should have to assume the ap- 
 pearance of THE BRANCH to occur at a time when the sec- 
 ond temple is destroyed. But that would contradict Mala- 
 chi, the last of the'three post-exilic prophets, who prophe- 
 sies in the ist verse of his 3d chapter: " Behold, I will send 
 my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me; 
 and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his 
 temple, even the messenger of the covenant whom ye de- 
 light in: behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of hosts." 
 
 Here are three different persons introduced. The way- 
 preparing messenger, viz., Elijah, as he is called later on; 
 the Lord, i. e., God; and the Messenger of the Covenant, /. e., 
 the Mediator of the new covenant promised by the proph- 
 ets. Jer. 31:31, Isa. 42: 6: 49:8. What we are to understand 
 is, I suppose, that the coming of this Mediator of this cov- 
 enant is, indirectly, the coming Lord Himself. But what 
 we are concerned with is only this: that the day of the 
 Lord, which accomplishes judgment and salvation, and 
 ushers in the time of the new covenant, occurs during 
 the time of the second temple. This second temple has, 
 however, been more than fifteen hundred years removed 
 from the holy mountain, so that not one stone has re- 
 mained upon another. 
 
 Kas, after all, that been ful filled long ago, which you,
 
 22 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 my dear Jewish reader, expect yet to come hereafter? Is 
 not, after all, perhaps, that Jesus who once addressed to 
 the Jewish people the words, " Behold, your house is left 
 unto you desolate," is not He, after all, THE BRANCH ' spok- 
 en of by Zechariah, and "the Messenger of the Covenant" 
 spoken of by Malachi? Has He not truly ushered in a new 
 time in which the kingdom of God went over from the 
 rightful basis to the other nations, as Malachi, according 
 to the ist chapter and nth verse, declares to have actually 
 seen? These are questions addressed to the conscience, 
 which every Israelite to whom truth is dearer than his ac- 
 customed notions, should ask himself, as in the sight of God. 
 
 IT is then, a spiritual temple of living stones, which,, 
 according to the prospect held out by Zechariah's prophecy, 
 THE BRANCH, who combines in himself the priestly and roy- 
 al offices, would build. The congregation of the New Cov- 
 enant, whose mediator is the messenger predicted by Mal- 
 achi, is this spiritual temple. For it is a congregation,, 
 gathered, in the first instance, out of Israel, but afterwards 
 breaking down the national limitation, and reaching out 
 towards all nations. It is a congregation, not kept together 
 by the bonds of consanguinity, but it is a spiritual congre- 
 gation, united by their unity with the God of revelation. 
 The Old Covenant is dissolved after it has been shown to be 
 insufficient to realize the counsel of God which is directed 
 toward the whole race of man. National privilege has 
 ceased after having performed its preparatory service. 
 The law of Israel is a national law, and as such is unsuit- 
 able to become the rule of life for a congregation composed 
 of all nations. It was a preparatory step, and is now, since 
 Christ appeared, an obsolete platform. The Prophets, and 
 Psalmists, and the writers of the so-called Books of Wis- 
 dom, 3 laid, already, stress upon the essential in religion; 
 they deprecated the external compliance with ceremonial 
 laws, demanded in place of animal and vegetable sacrifices 
 self-dedication of the inner man, and reduced the real will 
 
 .roan '-so (3 .rp",an -^o (i .nos (1
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 23 
 
 of God, whose reflex are the ceremonial prescriptions, to 
 the real and immediate religious concerns. They prepared 
 for what has been realized by the Christian religion, name- 
 ly, the deepening and widening of the religion of the Law. 
 Of course, if the Mosaic law were truly an unchangeable 
 divine revelation, Judaism would be right in opposing the 
 Christian religion. Maimonides takes up that position; 
 but not without opposition from other Jewish dogmatists 
 like Isaac Albo, who maintains: God Himself may, in 
 changed circumstances, declare a change in what He orig- 
 inally commanded. A proof of this is to be found, e. g., in 
 the relationship of the laws given in the book of Deuter- 
 onomy, dating from the fortieth year after the exodus, to- 
 ward the law given from Sinai in the first year. 
 
 That the Hebrew male slave should be free in the sev- 
 enth year, according to Ex. 21: 2, is, according to Deut. 15: 
 '12, extended into granting the same privilege to the Hebrew 
 maid-servant. The general law, in Ex. 21:16, that the 
 stealing of men is to be punished with death, is narrowed, 
 according to Deut. 24: 7, so as to apply only to the case of the 
 stolen person who has been sold as a slave, being a Hebrew. 
 While, according to Lev. 17:3, no sacrificial animal may be 
 slain except at the tabernacle, the killing of animals for do- 
 mestic use is, according to Deut. 12, allowed in any locality. 
 And again, the old law, according to which, wherever God 
 is present, a plain altar of earth, or uncut stones, and with- 
 out steps, should be erected, according to Ex. 20: 24 ff, was 
 superseded by the erection of the tabernacle and the brazen 
 altar, 1 and by the demand of the book of Deuteronomy for 
 a central sanctuary, as the exclusive place for sacrifices. 
 These are only a few examples, which might be augmented 
 by others referring to laws about festivals as given in the 
 Pentateuch. The names of the festivals, the number of the 
 
 great feasts, the prescriptions referring to sacrifices, all 
 
 have been modified, in the course of time. And if, within 
 the time covered by the Pentateuch, the law underwent 
 changes, why should changes which' have a right to lay
 
 24 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 claim to divine authority, be considered impossible in the 
 time after the Pentateuch? The prophets prove the con- 
 trary. The law, according to Deut. 23: 2, excludes all 
 eunuchs from the congregation of the Lord. But the 
 prophet Isaiah, according to 56:3-5, of his book, breaks 
 through this barrier of the law, and comforts the eunuchs 
 returning from Babylon by the promise of membership 
 with all its rights. It might be objected that though such 
 modifications in isolated cases might be admissible, the 
 complete abrogation of the ceremonial law is inconceivable. 
 
 But for the prophets there exists no such insurmount- 
 able difficulty. "Wherewith shall I come before the Lord," 
 we read in Micah 6: 6-8, "and bow myself before the high 
 God? Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with 
 calves of a year old? Will the Lord be pleased with thou- 
 sands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil? Shall 
 I give my first-born for my transgression, the fruit of my 
 body for the sin of my soul? He hath showed thee, Oman, 
 what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but 
 to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with 
 thy God?" 
 
 And Jeremiah says, in deprecation of the hypocritical 
 sacrificial services: " I spake not unto your fathers, nor 
 commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the 
 land of Egypt, concerning burnt-offerings or sacrifices; but 
 this thing commanded I them, saying: Obey my voice, and 
 I will be your God, and ye shall be my people." Jer. 7: 22. 
 These are declarations which sound like anticipations of 
 the future abrogation of the ceremonial law. 
 
 It is different, indeed, with Ezekiel, who, in chapters 
 40 to 48, propounds a new ceremonial law for the whole of 
 Israel returned from the land of exile. But the new eccle- 
 siastical and political commonwealth which he describes 
 has not been realized, its conditions having remained un- 
 fulfilled. But this part of the book of Ezekiel is on this 
 very ground an important part of the canon of the Script- 
 ures, that it furnishes- a clear proof against the immutabil- 
 ity of the Mosaic law. 
 
 The Midrash says frequently that the Holy One bless-
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 25 
 
 ed be He will give a new law through the Messiah. The 
 new feature of this law is that it discloses the object and 
 spirit of the old. 
 
 Does not the preacher of the Sermon on the Mount 
 correspond to this picture of the future? 
 
 And another passage in the Midrash says: In the days 
 of the Messiah all sacrifices will cease, except thank-offer- 
 ings. 1 Is not Jesus, perhaps, after all, .that servant of the 
 Lord who, according to the prophecy in Isa. 53: 10, will 
 " make his soul an offering for sin," 1 for his people? 
 
 JEWS who are familiar with the New Testament, in 
 arguing for the immutability of the law, will perhaps ap- 
 peal to the sayings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount 
 (Matt. 5: 17), " Think not that I am come to destroy the 
 law or the prophets; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." 
 This is the saying which is also cited in the Talmud (tract 
 Sabbath, 116 b), but incorrectly rendered: " I have not come 
 to beat down 3 the law of Moses, but to add 4 to it." The 
 right idea is still to be recognized even in this disfigure- 
 ment of the meaning of the expression. Far from desiring 
 to do any injury to the revealed law, or to deny its divine 
 authority, Jesus in opposition to an observance of the 
 law which clung to the letter and considered its external 
 fulfillment to suffice, wished to teach and render possible 
 a deep and true inward realization of the law, which should 
 comprehend its radical and fundamental principle as the 
 veritable will and intention of God. As Jesus is the ful- 
 filler of prophecy, since His person and His work is the 
 realization of what was foretold by the prophets, so also is 
 He the fulfiller of the law, since as a mediator in word and 
 deed He has accomplished the realization of what God, the 
 Law-giver, had in view. 
 
 Because He carries the external and ceremonial pre- 
 cepts of the law back to their heart and spirit, it cannot be 
 drawn from His words that they are .to be broken down. 
 
 .cv* (2 .minn pnpo p n (i 
 (4 .nns^B 1 ? (3
 
 26 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 On the contrary, He recognizes the binding character of 
 the whole law at that time, when He adds, in verse 19, 
 " Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least com- 
 mandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the 
 least in the kingdom of heaven; but whosoever shall do 
 and teach them, the same shall be called great in the king- 
 dom of heaven." The kingdom of heaven is identical with 
 the Messianic kingdom. It is the new order in the universe 
 and in human life, which has its center and its head in 
 Jesus Christ. This kingdom of heaven does not come into 
 existence by means of a sudden breaking down of the old 
 order, and whoever of his own will looses one of the least 
 precepts of the revealed law does it at his peril. 
 
 Jesus could not speak otherwise during His life and 
 work here below; for, as Paul wrote to the Galatians (Gal. 
 4:4), "When the fullness of the time was come, God sent 
 forth His Son, made of a woman, made under the law." He 
 was the bodily son of a Jewish mother, the legal though 
 not the bodily son of a Jewish father, and through circum- 
 cision He was united with the congregation of Israel and 
 received into participation of its rights and duties. He 
 defends those of His disciples who set aside the rabbinical 
 ordinances in regard to the washing of the hands before 
 meals (Mark 7:6, 7); He speaks in their behalf when they 
 plucked ears of corn on the Sabbath in order to appease 
 their hunger (Mark 2: 23-28); and claims for Himself free- 
 dom to do works of benevolence and mercy also upon the 
 Sabbath; but never do we read that He declared the Sab- 
 bath commandment, or any commandment of the Mosaic 
 law, not to be binding, or that He ever did aught against 
 the word, the thought, and the spirit of that law. His ad- 
 herence to the law is, of course, not that of the Pharisees, 
 but that of the Prophets. When he says, " Not that which 
 goeth into the mouth defileth a man, but that which com. 
 eth out of the mouth, this defileth a man (Matt. 15:11), 
 He releases neither Himself nor His disciples from the ob- 
 servance of the dietary laws: but He wishes, nevertheless, 
 to say that the polluting effect of forbidden food is as noth- 
 ing in comparison with the polluting effect of foul talk, and
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 27 
 
 profane, indecent speech. It is similar to the words of the 
 prophet Isaiah, when he says that it is not a fast acceptable 
 to God for a man to afflict his soul and to spread sackcloth 
 and ashes under him, but rather to deal his bread to the 
 hungry, and to bring the poor that are cast out to his 
 house. Isa. 58: 5, 7. And when Jesus said to the Pharisees 
 who complained of His intercourse with publicans and sin- 
 ners: "Go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have 
 mercy and not sacrifice." (Matt. 9: 13), He simply confirms 
 an old expression of the prophet Hosea (6:6), which He 
 employs as His own. He does not remove the obligation 
 to bring the offerings prescribed for particular cases; for 
 He said to the leper, "Go thy way, show thyself to the 
 priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded" (Matt. 
 8: 4), and He obliges the one who has quarreled with his 
 brother to interrupt the offering of his gift until he has 
 become reconciled. Matt. 5: 23, 24. He considers, therefore* 
 the offering of the gift to be of service, but He delares that 
 the outward gift is worthless before God if it is not accom- 
 panied by the giving up of the evil and hateful self-will. 
 He was one of that people for whom sacrifices were offered 
 in the temple every morning and evening, and on all festi- 
 vals. He, however, did not feel obliged to bring an offer- 
 ing for Himself personally, for He knew Himself to be 
 without sin, and it is also nowhere related that He appeared 
 before God with a personal offering (the so-called ikagiga], 
 upon the occasion of the three great feasts according to 
 the old law. Ex. 23: 14-16; 34: 23. The temple tribute of a 
 half -shekel He, however, paid, in order not to give offense, 
 although He felt conscious that He was free from the obli- 
 gation of the tax of the temple because of His relation of 
 Sonship to the Lord of the temple (Matt. 17:24-27), but 
 He was not able to present an offering for Himself; for 
 His inmost thought was, " Sacrifice and offering thou didst 
 not desire; mine ears hast thou opened; burnt-offering 
 and sin-offering hast thou not required. Then said I, Lo, I 
 come; in the volume of the book it is written of me, I de- 
 light to do thy will, O my God; yea, thy law is within my 
 heart." Psa. 40: 7-9, English Bible, 6-8.
 
 28 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 He was made under the law, imder the law in every 
 particular, bound by its ceremonies and its statutes in ref- 
 erence to matters of outward life; for so it was God's decree 
 that He Himself, having submitted to the law, should re- 
 deem His people from the constraint and the limitations 
 and the curse of the law. He was made under the law, 
 but at the same time He continued the work of the proph- 
 ets, since He had set those precepts of the law, which had 
 been observed in the letter by hard and unsanctified hearts, 
 over against moral duties to man as man, and gave to these 
 a deeper significance. The law was to wear itself out in 
 Him. and was to pronounce His death sentence, since zeal 
 on account of the law persecuted Him even to His death. 
 It was a boastful Pharisaic strictness as to the letter of 
 the law which condemned His insistence upon the spirit 
 of the law as apostasy from the law, and which allowed 
 itself to rush onward to the blasphemy of the Holy Ghost, 
 who spoke and worked through Him. And is it not also 
 true to day, that Reformed Judaism, which opposes itself 
 to the law from the prophetic stand-point of spiritual great- 
 ness and moral purity, is willing to recognize the noble 
 struggle of Jesus, while the so-called orthodox Judaism, 
 when it is obliged to mention Him, thrusts Him far off 
 with the imprecation, " May His name and memory be 
 blotted out?" 1 
 
 He was made under the law until death; but after 
 He, through His death, entered the life of glory, He was 
 taken from the limitation of the national law, as also from 
 attachment to an especial nation. The Thorah, which 
 was revealed from Him, the exalted Son of God and man, 
 by means of the Spirit of Pentecost, which followed the 
 Passover of His death and resurrection, is that law intend- 
 ed for all mankind, concerning which it was prophesied by 
 Micah and Isaiah, '' Out of Zion [as before from Sinai,] 
 shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from 
 Jerusalem " (Micah 4: 2, Isa. 2: 3), and for which " the isles" 
 (/. e., the distant heathen lands), "shall wait." Isa. 42:4. 
 
 .van IOTP nr (i
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 29 
 
 " The law," says Paul, "was our schoolmaster to bring us 
 unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after 
 that faith is come we are no longer under a schoolmaster. ' 
 Gal. 3: 24, 25. The apostle did not live till August, A. D. 
 70, when the will of God that the national law should yield 
 to the universal law, for which the former was a prepara- 
 tion, was confirmed by the fiery judgment decreed for the 
 temple in Jerusalem. Since then a great part of the cere- 
 monial law has been without force. Numberless com- 
 mands, which were obligatory in the Holy Land, or in the 
 Temple, could not therefore be put into execution. All 
 the laws of sacrifice, the centre of the ceremonial law, be- 
 came relaxed; for the legal place of sacrifice lay in ashes, 
 and Zion, the temple mountain, was no longer an Israelit- 
 ish possession. And this condition of things has lasted, 
 not merely for decades, as at the time of the Babylonian 
 captivity, but for nearly two millenniums; and it seems as 
 though it would last forever. And then, too, the universal 
 feeling brought about by Christianity has effectually de- 
 stroyed the bloody sacrifice for the Jewish consciousness. 
 Holdheim, the renowned founder of Reformed Judaism, 
 says in his discourse upon the Ceremonial Law in the Messi- 
 anic Kingdom, 1845, p. 40, " We cannot speak of a sacrifice in 
 the Messianic kingdom, since even to-day it is in the high- 
 est degree contrary to every pure idea of faith." He sees 
 a confirmation of this in the fact that orthodox Judaism 
 has failed in every attempt to provide for the possibility of 
 sacrifices, although it maintains that the ancient holiness 
 remains to the temple, even in its condition of destruc- 
 tion; 1 we need therefore only to find a piece of the temple 
 court in order to put the law of sacrifice again in operation. 
 But no Rothschild, no Montefiore, no Cremieux, has ever 
 made a single attempt with this in view, for'no person in the 
 present state of culture wishes the restoration of a sanctu- 
 ary which echoes with the groans of dying beasts, and 
 whose floor, like that of a slaughter-house, swims in blood. 
 Religion, spiritualized by Christianity, cannot endure it;
 
 30 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 nor can the Jewish religion escape the influence of this 
 tendency toward refinement, even though it endeavors to 
 resist Christianity. 
 
 We believe we have here shown that the downfall of 
 the national ceremonial law, although it could not have 
 been proclaimed by Jesus Himself, nevertheless, from in- 
 ward necessity and by a divine decree, was the consequence 
 of His coming. 
 
 THE Christian who believes in the Bible does not yield 
 to the Israelite in his esteem for the Pentateuchal Law- 
 He recognizes the revealed character of this law and its 
 incomparable superiority to all the codes of antiquity. It 
 maintains its pre-eminent character, as over against the 
 idea of justice current in Christian states in times past, for 
 example, in regard to punishment; for it knows no tor- 
 ture, and it excludes from the death execution those fear- 
 ful abuses and torments which have characterized even the 
 penal code of Charles V. And as to civil matters it is pre- 
 eminent, since by a suitable distribution of the soil it 
 checked poverty, and by the assurance of hereditary pos- 
 sessions it prevented the impoverishment of a family. 
 With justice could Moses, the great law-giver, say, " What 
 nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments 
 so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this 
 day? " Deut. 4:8. And with justice also does David con- 
 fess in the igth Psalm, " The law of the Lord is perfect." ' 
 The law is really perfect as to its innermost motives and 
 its ultimate ends. But with equal justice must we con- 
 cede, as children of the Christian dispensation, that accord- 
 ing to the letter it is only relatively perfect. It is very true 
 that the double command, " Thou shalt love the Lord thy 
 God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with 
 all thy might;" (Deut. 6: 5) and, "Thou shalt love thy 
 neighbor as thyself;" 2 (Lev. 19: 18) expresses the will of 
 God so completely that even the New Testament revela- 
 tion can only reiterate these words. Mark 12: 28-34, Rom. 
 13: 9 ff. But, on the other hand, it is also true that in the 
 
 (2 nsron (l
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 31 
 
 context of the Thorah this double command addresses it- 
 self to Israel as a nation, as is seen from the fact that the 
 command to love one's neighbor is especially extended to 
 the stranger dwelling within the bounds of Israel. Lev. 19: 
 34. This two-fold command, which binds together the 
 first and second tables of the Decalogue, 1 likewise lays 
 down a system of statutes, which have in view the resto- 
 ration of a holy people, whose king is the all-holy One, and 
 accordingly for the most part having to do with the exter- 
 nal relations of life. The establishment of a national peo- 
 ple of God was the necessary preparation for the establish- 
 ment of a universal people of God from all mankind. The 
 relationship into which God entered with Israel as His chos- 
 en people was the ground of the future kingdom of God, 
 comprehending all nations. The realization of the divine 
 decree which has for its object the salvation of mankind, 
 came within the limits of a nationality, not that tnese lim- 
 its should abide, but that when they had accomplished 
 their preparatory end they should be removed. Its en- 
 trance within the national limits, had, however, as its result, 
 a contradiction of the moral ideal. The Law, as national, 
 cannot avoid an external and particular character insepa- 
 rable from a state and a nation, and the degree of spiritual 
 and moral culture among the people made necessary cer- 
 tain adaptations, which could be permitted, since the law- 
 giver did not claim to bring the true will of God to im 
 mediate and full realization. The Thorah accommodates 
 itself to certain firmly rooted habits and customs, such as 
 blood-revenge, slavery, polygamy, and levirate marriages, 
 since it is satisfied with certain alleviating, limiting and 
 regulating restrictions upon them, and contains, here and 
 there, namely, in the permitted grounds for divorce, some 
 striking defects, since it restricts them to the limits of 
 what is at present attainable. In comparison with other 
 legal codes of the ancient world, it amply vindicates its di- 
 vine origin; but it has also a limited human side, because 
 of the condition of morality and of culture in its time. It 
 
 rrwy (1
 
 32 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 conceals an eternal kernel in a temporary shell. Judaism 
 itself, in the lapse of time, has come to esteem its human 
 elements as partly impracticable and partly contrary to the 
 progress of morality. 
 
 Polygamy and levirate marriages furnish many in- 
 structive examples to show that the Mosaic law, as being a 
 special national code for Israel, is not an expression of the 
 exact will of God for all mankind equally. These exam- 
 ples also show that the Thorah does not conceal this but 
 plainly intimates it. Marriage is (Gen. 2: 18 ff) so close a 
 relation of personal intimacy that it cannot be conceived 
 except as a relation of two persons only; it is impossible to 
 think of it as a relation existing at the same time between 
 one man and several women, or between one woman and 
 several men. Only monogamy is true marriage; polygamy 
 contradicts the idea of marriage. Nevertheless, polygamy 
 is permitted in the Mosaic law. The ancient custom, sup- 
 ported upon the precedent of the patriarchs, was too deeply 
 rooted to be destroyed. The law with regard to inherit- 
 ance (Deut. 21:15-17,) shows that a man may have two 
 proper wives. Another law (Ex. 21:10) assures the right 
 of one wife against one taken afterward. It is permitted 
 on certain conditions that one may have as wife or concu- 
 bine a captive taken in war. Deut. 21: 10-14 The law with 
 regard to the king forbids the king to have many wives, 
 but without restricting him to monogamy. Deut. 17: 17. 
 
 The example of David and Solomon shows what re- 
 sults followed the relaxation of the Thorah in later times. 
 Jehoiada, the tutor of the young king Joash, took for him 
 two wives. 2 Chron. 24: 3. And the Thorah even requires 
 the addition of one wife to another in one case, namely, 
 in the law of the marriage of brothers-in-law (Deut. 25: 5 ff) 
 for the case that the living brother is already married is no 
 doubt included, although this case, and likewise the case 
 that the one dead had several wives, is left without men- 
 tion, and the old custom is not sanctioned, unless possibly 
 in the chaliza, the ceremony described in Deut. 25: 9. It in- 
 dicates a progress in the spirit of the law, if not in con- 
 formity with its letter, that the Mishna Jebamoth extends
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 33 
 
 the right of chaliza many times casuisticnlly. In the Mid- 
 dle Age. Gerson von Metz (died A. D. 1028), who was called 
 the Light of the Exiles, 1 forbade polygamy and only per- 
 mitted it by way of exception, but without being able to 
 accomplish his end. For almost two centuries the wealthy 
 French and Spanish Jews lived in bigamy, and it is due to 
 the increasing influence of Christian government, at least 
 in Europe, that monogamy became the rule among Jews. 
 How far the spirit of Christianity struggled against plural 
 marriages is shown by the secret marriage of the Land- 
 grave Philip, of Hesse, with Margaret von der Saal, in ad- 
 dition to his marriage with a daughter of George, Duke of 
 Saxony. This marriage was permitted by both Luther and 
 Melanchthon. Melanchthon (who was present at the mar- 
 riage, March 3, 1540,) fell afterwards into a terrible state 
 of mind on account of this, which brought him to the brink 
 of the grave. Luther thought afterwards, as well as before, 
 that he could justify this permission in the sight of God; 
 but his opinion, that what was permitted in the case of the 
 patriarchs, might also be permitted to Christians in a case 
 of extreme necessity, rested upon a narrow view of the 
 difference between Christianity and the Old Testament 
 religion. * 
 
 The rabbi, Dr. Isidor Kalisch (died May 9, 1886, Neve- 
 ark, X. J.), one of the most gifted and energetic advocates 
 of reform, in his "Ancient and Modern Judaism" has put to- 
 gether the beliefs of modern Judaism in ten sections, of 
 which the third is: " The Mosaic religion is capable of an 
 endless progress." He means by this its development to a 
 universal religion. This development is consummated in 
 the fact that Christanity has come from the bosom of Ju- 
 daism. Reformed Judaism is Christianity without Christ; 
 it is a light \vhich denies the sourer of light from which it 
 is taken. The seventh section reads: "Traditional cere- 
 monies and customs, whether biblical or not biblical, must 
 be altered and even abolished as soon as their form vio- 
 lates the ethics or the feelings of modern civilization." 
 
 (l
 
 34 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 This is a thought which without Christianity could never 
 find lodgement in a Jewish heart or utterance from a Jew- 
 ish mouth. Among these customs is polygamy, in regard 
 to which Christianity antedated Judaism at least a thous- 
 and years in rejecting it as a matter of principle. 
 
 In another point also it is shown that the Mosaic law 
 is not a direct and complete revelation of God's will. The 
 law in Deut. 24: 1-4 attempts to check absolute freedom in 
 divorce, but it declares that the husband has a right to put 
 away his wife if he finds her in anything shameful. 1 The 
 extent of the meaning of this leaves room for arbitrariness, 
 and has caused a multitude of desertions for slight reasons 
 everywhere where the Jewish people was its own law as to 
 marriage. Was Jesus not right when He said (Matt. 19:8) 
 that the law was in this respect far behind the ideal of 
 marriage, and accommodated itself to the hard hearts of 
 the'people? Is, then, the time yet so far off when Talmud- 
 ical Judaism shall cease to hate Him, and Reformed Juda- 
 ism shall begin to give Him honor? 
 
 THE ceremonial sacrifices came to an end together with 
 the ceremonial law. As circumcision was a previously ex- 
 isting custom outside of Israel before it became, by divine 
 revelation, the covenant sign of the people descending from 
 Abraham, so also was sacrifice the chief element of Gentile 
 worship before the Sinaitic law distinctly marked it as the 
 'chief element in the worship of the one true God. With 
 sacrifice, however, the matter stands quite otherwise than 
 with circumcision. Circumcision arose from an endeavor 
 to attain bodily purity, but as a means to this end it was a 
 custom only among a few nations. But sacrifices are found 
 among all nations who possess more than an undefined 
 knowledge of a higher Being. There is a religious neces- 
 sity which urges man by an inward need to offer sacrifices. 
 A sacrifice is, according to its fundamental idea, a present 
 or a gift. It is an offering,'- as was that of Cain and Abel, 
 
 l nny (l 
 .nn:_ 2
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 3 = 
 
 the oldest and first mentioned in the Holy Scriptures. All 
 that man possesses he has from God. Be can give nothing 
 to God which was not received from Him before. It is not 
 possible for him to deny himself his whole possession; that 
 would contradict the end for which God gave it. There- 
 fore he gives Him a part, in order by this self-denial to 
 attain the sanctification and blessing of the whole also, 
 though even as a gift the sacrifice has a mediatorial signifi- 
 cance. Man lets his sacrifice plead for God's grace in his 
 behalf, just as Jacob sent beforehand an offering 1 to Esau 
 to induce him to be gracious. So man lets his sacrifice 
 step in as a third term between himself and God, that it 
 may work out for him who brings it God's favor and good- 
 will. In this sense a sacrifice is, even now, a way of show- 
 ing reverence to God. It is a sacrifice to make an altar 
 covering, or a painted window, or any holy vessel for the 
 hoXise of God, or to render it beautiful with flowers. 
 
 The matter stands, however, otherwise with the bloody 
 sacrifice, or the offering of slain beasts. That beasts are 
 to be slain in order to afford enjoyment to God. is a crude 
 idea which has place in heathendom, because they have a 
 low conception of divinity. We will, however, on the other 
 hand, leave it uncertain whether in the heathen world the 
 offering of the life of a beast availed as a substitute for the 
 offerer who deemed himself worthy of death. It is enough 
 that there, also, the idea of atonement, or the appeasing of 
 divine anger, is connected with a bloody sacrifice. But the 
 Word of God declares how the blood of the offerings 
 brought to the God of Israel shall be understood; for it is 
 there stated, -as a ground for the prohibition of the eating 
 of blood, that "the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I 
 have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement 
 for your souls; for it is the blood that maketh an atone- 
 ment for the soul." Lev. 17:11. That the soul is in the 
 blood lies in the nature of the soul and of the blood. But 
 that the blood of beasts is a means of atonement does not 
 follow from the nature of such blood, but from the fact
 
 36 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 that God has allowed, appointed and ordained it 1 for this 
 end. It expiates by virtue of the soul (or life) which is in it; 
 therefore the soul (or life) of the beast comes in as a sub- 
 stitute for the soul of the man, to make an atonement for 
 it; that is, to shield it from God's anger. We do not wish 
 to inquire here how we are to regard this substitution, but 
 this much remains certain, that according to the Sinaitic 
 law the atonement is connected with blood,* that is to that 
 blood which is brought to the altar, poured out upon it, or 
 sprinkled on the horns of the altar. All bloody sacrifices, 
 as such, possess an atoning force. Atonement is not the 
 chief object of all of them, but always and everywhere 
 must the application of the blood upon the altar precede 
 the offering of the sacrifice, in order that this may be re- 
 ceived as the gift of one for whom atonement has been made, 
 that is, of one freed from guilt, and well pleasing to God. 
 
 If the matter really stands thus, that for Israel, the 
 people of the law, the divinely-appointed means of atone- 
 ment was found in the blood of sacrifices, it may be asked 
 what means of atonement has taken the place of sacrificial 
 blood since the destruction of the temple. It is plain that 
 the reading of the chapter enjoining sacrifice can be no 
 substitute; the reading of a prescription cannot take the 
 place of medicine for a sick person. And prayer, repent- 
 ance, and fasting, 3 could not avail as a substitute, since 
 prayer, repentance, and self-mortification must be connect- 
 ed with sacrifices, according to their especial object, other- 
 wise they would be but dead works without a corresponding 
 inward reality; therefore these three could not render 
 sacrifices superfluous. But one will object was not the 
 spiritual worship without temple and sacrifice a matter of 
 necessity during the seventy years of the Babylonian cap- 
 tivity? Certainly, the people of God should learn by this 
 period of sojourn in a strange land, that the essence of all 
 religion is the worship of God in spirit and in truth. The 
 
 .v>nr: a 
 
 .013 hx rr>r: .- 
 
 3) The three n's; r\1Sr\, prayer, nrwn, repentance, and n-:yn fast- 
 ing.
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 37 
 
 Lord was then to them a "little sanctuary 1 (Ezek n: 16), 
 t. e., He took fora time the place of the temple, He shielded 
 them in communion with Himself as " in his pavilion,"" in 
 the time of trouble." Psa. 27:5. The Exile was a prepara- 
 tory school to that future in which all sacrifices, except 
 sacrifices of thanksgiving, shall come to an end. 2 See Vay- 
 yikra ral>/>a,-ch. 9, and elsewhere. But if, after the restora- 
 tion of sacrificial worship and the second destruction of 
 the temple, it is now to be thought that the eighteen hun- 
 dred years which have since passed by, are a repeated 
 preparation for the Messianic age, is the conclusion not 
 to be drawn from the length of this period that the time 
 has really come for the worship of God in spirit and in 
 truth, although not recognized by that people for whom 
 it was especially intended? 
 
 In the Prophets and the Psalms the ceremonial offering 
 is mostly understood as the symbol of a spiritual offering, 
 principally the offering of one's self, without which and in 
 comparison with which the ceremonial offering is worth- 
 less, e.g.,'Mica.h 6:6-8, and Psa. 50. But there is also kept 
 in view the self-sacrifice of a Servant of God which has a 
 relation to the ceremonial offerings and to what they ac- 
 complish according to God's command, which is that of an- 
 titype to type. The Servant of God, depicted in Isaiah 52: 
 13 to 53: 12, offers Himself as a sacrifice 3 for the sins of His 
 people. His chastisement accomplishes their peace, and 
 His wounds bring them healing. He, the Righteous One, 
 accomplishes a righteousness which proceeds from the sins 
 for which He makes atonement. And Zechariah, after 
 prophesying (Zech. 12,) that the Jewish people one day will 
 look with repentance and longing upon the great Pierced 
 One, whose piercing the Lord considers as a deed of blood 
 inflicted upon Himself, 4 goes on to say : " In that day there 
 shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the 
 
 (1 
 
 mm pipi p^ea nuaipn ^3 xsS Tnjr 1 ? (2 
 
 .owx (3 
 npn -,WK nx ^x 'E-ani (4
 
 38 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness." Zech 
 13: i. Therefore, if the people will recognize their offense 
 against that Pierced One with penitent grief, it will then 
 be of no avail to doubt that a fountain is opened out of 
 which flows water which purifies from guilt and impurity 
 These are prophetic words of such clearness that no one 
 who connects them with what the gospels relate can silence 
 his conscience by explaining them away, even by dint of 
 the most skillful exegesis. 
 
 It cannot occur to any one to deny that the great 
 Pierced One is an individual person. A collective person, 
 ality cannot be there meant, but One, namely, Israel's Sav- 
 iour, as is evident from Zech. 13:1; for His death, misun- 
 derstood as to its basis and purpose, becomes a source of 
 salvation. But by the Servant of the Lord mentioned in 
 Isaiah 52: 13 to 53: 12, many understand a plural number. 
 The Tenth section of the Confession of Faith constructed 
 by Isidor Kalisch declares : " Israel's holy calling is to be- 
 come the saving Messiah of humanity." But that Servant 
 of the Lord offers Himself for His people, and that the 
 whole body of a people should offer themselves for the 
 whole body of a people is an inconsistency, is a self-contra- 
 diction. If the idea of the Servant of the Lord be, never- 
 theless, a collective idea, then, in distinction from the mass 
 of the people, the whole body must be understood of those 
 who make every effort, and risk everything, in order to 
 free their people from inward and outward misery, although 
 misunderstood by them in narrow blindness. But at the 
 same time it is very natural that in this whole body of the 
 true servants of the Lord one should tower above others, 
 and that One should outrank all of them. Should not Jesus 
 be this incomparable One? Countless Israelites have been 
 conquered inwardly by this prophetic picture of the future, 
 for the prophet here depicts the Crucified One 1 as though 
 He stood under the cross. " That is from, the New Testa- 
 ment, not from the Old! " cried one, as the 53d chapter of 
 Isaiah was read to him. And when he was convinced of 
 
 y-.- .1
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 3$ 
 
 the contrary he resisted the blinding light, not hesitating 
 to say, " Then Isaiah went too far! " 
 
 BUT why do we then need a Mediator? is the query 
 many a reader will here interject. Everywhere in the Holy 
 Scriptures, whether in the Psalms or elsewhere, when 
 prayer is offered for the forgiveness of sins, the petition is 
 offered directly to the Holy One Blessed be He! to Him 
 who has revealed Himself as " tne Lord God, merciful and 
 gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and 
 truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and 
 transgression and sin" (Ex. 34:6, 7); to Rim whom praising, 
 the psalmist thus calls upon his own soul, " Bless the Lord, 
 O my soul, and all that is within me bless his holy name 
 Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits; 
 who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy dis- 
 eases; who redeemeth thy life from destruction; who 
 crowneth thee with loving-kindness and tender mercies." 
 Psa. 103: 1-4. On the other hand, we read, " If thou, Lord, 
 shouldst mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand?" Psa. 
 139: 3 But the suppliant knows that God suffers mercy to 
 come upon us instead of justice, and he confirms this when 
 he continues, " But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou 
 mayest be feared " (Psa. 130:4), that is, "Because thou wilt 
 be honored thankfully, thou forgivest willingly and richly." 
 
 Why then do we need a Mediator? In the book of Isa- 
 iah we read this saving command, " Let the wicked forsake 
 his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts, and let 
 him return unto the Lord, and He will have mercy upon 
 him; and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon." Isa. 
 55:7. But there is even here also the mention of a Media- 
 tor, whom the Israel of the future will acknowledge. " The 
 chastisement of our peace was upon him, and with his 
 stripes we are healed." Isa. 53: 5. It will, therefore, be no 
 contradiction that we read in one place, " I, even I, am he 
 that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake " 
 (Isa. 43: 25), and in another place, " By his knowledge shall 
 my righteous servant justfy many; for he shall bear their 
 iniquities." Isa. 55: n.
 
 40 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 Still one will always be able to object that the fif.ty. 
 third chapter of the book of Isaiah is, nevertheless, isolat- 
 ed, and a doctrine peculiar to the second part of the book 
 of Isaiah can prove nothing against the many other holy 
 books of the Old Testament. Everywhere else it is God 
 Himself who takes away sins and blots them out and cov- 
 ers and forgives them, He alone and for His own sake, of 
 free grace, pure and absolute. We would be treating the 
 evidences for the truth of Christianity too lightly if we 
 ignored the importance of these objections. But the right 
 answer will, at the same time, put in the right light that 
 Christian doctrine which is the especial stone of stumbling 
 for Judaism, the doctrine of the trinity of the Godhead. It 
 is by no means so difficult to understand that God and His 
 Holy Spirit are to be discriminated, and in such a manner, 
 indeed, that the latter is not a blind working force, but an 
 Energy proceeding from God, who dwells in the divine 
 consciousness. But that Christ is God and man in one 
 person, that is what, from the Jewish point of view, is re- 
 garded as inconsistent with the unity of God, while it is 
 also by us held to be the fundamental dogma of all true 
 religion. 
 
 It is not merely a characteristic of the religion of rev- 
 elation that in contrast with paganism it consists of the 
 teaching concerning the one God and His attributes in 
 Himself and in relation to His creatures. It is more than 
 that. It is the knowledge obtained through divine witnesses 
 in word and deed, concerning an eternal decree of God to 
 redeem humanity ruined in sin, and concerning the means 
 which He has established in order to accomplish this re- 
 demption. Through sin man has become far from God, 
 and God far from man. It is a fundamental postulate of 
 the revealed religion that God, in order to bring back men 
 from their condition of separation from God, and lift them 
 tip from the depth of their ruin, must personally, through 
 His own absolute presence, enter into their present human 
 history. In the very first pages of the Bible we read that 
 after the fall of man He personally appeared to him and 
 comforted him in the midst of his condemnation with the
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 41 
 
 prophecy of victory over the serpent. And the last pro- 
 phetic voice declares, " The Lord, whom ye seek, shall sud- 
 denly come to his temple." Mai. 3: i. From Obadiah (v. 15) 
 on, the watchword of all the prophets is, " The day of the 
 Lord is near," the day in which He will reveal Himself as 
 Judge and Redeemer in unveiled grandeur. He appears 
 chiefly as the Redeemer of Israel, for after mankind had 
 been separated into nations the assuranceof the theophany 
 (divine appearance) received a national coloring. The 
 Lord, Israel's God, will come and make Himself known ac- 
 cording to His promise. It is the deepest longing of the 
 people of the old covenant which finds expression in Isaiah 
 64: i, li Oh that thou wouldst rend the heavens, that thou 
 wouldst come down," and the similar expression of hope is 
 seen in Psa. 50: 3, " Our God shall come." And all creatures 
 which surround men are called upon (Psa. 96: n ff; 98:7 ff) 
 to exult with them at the approach of the Coming One. 
 
 But if God is to appear historically, and that in such a 
 manner that He not only talks with one man, as from the 
 pillar of cloud He talked with Moses at the giving of the 
 law, but also in such a manner that He comes into an inti- 
 mate relation with men; then it cannot be otherwise than 
 that He should make a man the abode of His presence, the 
 instrument of His thoughts and words, and the fulfiller 
 of His promise. It could not well be otherwise. And to 
 this which could not possibly be otherwise the Scripture 
 witnesses as a reality. "As the Angel of the Lord said, " I 
 am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God' 
 Isaac, and the God of Jacob " (Ex. 3: 6), because the God of 
 the patriarchs made him the means of attesting His own 
 presence; so also the Virgin's Son, in whose birth Isaiah 
 exults, is the bodily presence of the Mighty God, rich in 
 salvation, and the BRANCH 1 of David is called the " LORD 
 OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS"* (Jer. 23:6), because, as ap- 
 pears from a comparison with Jer. 33:16, the Lord, as the 
 Justifier and Sanctifier of His people dwells in His per- 
 
 (1 
 > nvr (2
 
 42 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 son as He dwells in the New Jerusalem. In Zech. 13:7 
 God calls Him "the man that is my fellow," and this fel- 
 lowship is so intimate that in Zech. 12: 10 He identifies Him 
 with Himself. The fellowship of God with His prophet is 
 already so intimate that in the prophetic books the " I " of 
 God and the " I " of the prophet are exchanged one for the 
 other; but the fellowship of God with His Messiah, or with 
 the Servant of the Lord and the Angel of the covenant, 
 who are prophesied in the books of Isaiah and Malachi, 
 must be considered as a fellowship still more intimate. 
 Whether the union of God with Him is capable of dogmat- 
 ic definition, and how it is to be defined, is here beside our 
 purpose to discuss. 
 
 The words of the dying Jacob, " I have waited for thy 
 salvation, O Lord " (Gen. 49: 18), remain from the begin- 
 ning to the end of the Old Testament period the unchanged 
 confession of faith. Salvation is of God, the Lord, who has 
 established the decree of salvation, and Himself also real- 
 izes it. Redemption from sin and its consequences, this 
 radical redemption, over against which every other is but 
 a fleeting shadow, is everywhere indicated in the Holy 
 Scriptures as the work of God Himself. That there is a 
 human mediation in this personal work of God is intimated 
 in Gen. 3: 15, and one cannot think otherwise in view of 
 this passage; and furthermore, the angels who take part 
 in the sacred narrative appear in human form and speak 
 with the human voice. But the acknowledgment of a hu- 
 man mediator, far from being always the same, has its pro- 
 gressive history. The idea of the Messiah under the figure 
 of a King, is unsuited to represent the Mediator in a re- 
 demption from sin and its consequences. Even in the fig- 
 ure of a King in whom God dwells, the divine King, the 
 work of the expiation and cleansing of sin is not found; 
 therefore the incomplete figure of a king becomes enlarged 
 in the later prophetic writings (Isa. chapters 40 to 66, Zech. 
 9 to 14, Mai. 3,) to the three-fold figure of the prophetic 
 declaration of truth, the priestly offering of Himself, and 
 a more than royal majesty. This future Mediator, who 
 is Prophet, Priest, and King, in one person, and in whom
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 43 
 
 the Lord comes to His people (Isa. 50:2), yea, who, accord- 
 ing to Mai. 3: i is the Lord 1 Himself, God calls T<yrc\ Isa 
 49:6. The joyous message of His coming to the daughter 
 of Zion is in Isa. 62: n, ,S2 iw run. That sounds like: 
 "See, thy Jesus cometh." 
 
 This Jesus has said of Himself, " All things are de- 
 livered unto me of my Father; and no man knoweth the 
 Son but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father 
 save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal 
 him." Matt. 11:27. With this agrees what he says in John 
 14: 9, 10, " He that hath seen me hath seen the Father," etc. 
 Never did a man dare say such a thing of himself. He is 
 in the Father and the Father in Him; He is the visible rep- 
 resentative of God Himself. As a human being He had, 
 as we all have, a temporal beginning; but the Eternal God 
 is so united with Him that our redemption which is wrought 
 in His sacrificial death, is, nevertheless, the work of God 
 Himself, as Paul says in 2 Cor. 5: 19, "God was in Christ 
 reconciling the world unto Himself." This is a mystery 
 into which the angels desire to look, and after the right 
 apprehension of which thoughtful believers have striven 
 since the beginning of the church. When once Israel has 
 recognized in this Jesus the Messiah, then will it assist in 
 promoting a fruitful understanding of this unfathomable 
 mystery. 
 
 THE religion of the New Testament contains nothing 
 the foundation of which was not laid as a preparation in 
 the Word of God in the Old Testament. When Paul says 
 of Jesus (Rom. 4: 25,) that He was delivered for our offenses 
 and was raised again for our justification, it is essentially 
 the same as what was said of the Servant of the Lord in 
 the 53d chapter of Isaiah. For of Him who, according to 
 God's economy, offered Himself for His people, Israel con- 
 fesses, as believing in the great wounded Sufferer, " The 
 chastisement of our peace was upon him, and with his 
 stripes we are healed." And even the Lord, who took Him 
 
 (l
 
 44 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 to Himself from agony and judgment, says of Him who 
 was taken away and lifted up by his persecutors, " By his 
 knowledge shall my righteous Servant justify many, for 
 he shall bear their iniquities." So then, the Servant of the 
 Lord willingly went to his death in order to atone for our 
 sins, and even through death He was exalted of God whose 
 decree He had fulfilled in order to procure for many, f. <?., 
 as many as believe on Him, a righteousness which will 
 avail before God, which rests upon the atonement wrought 
 by means of Himself. Christianity does not necessitate to 
 .the Israelite new and strange modes of thought, but only 
 this one new thought, that the prophetic word in the Old 
 Testament has come to a full realization in the crucified 
 and risen Jesus. 
 
 But how is it to be thought possible that from the vol- 
 untary sufferings and death of a man, atonement, justifica- 
 tion, and righteousness, accrue to those for whom He takes 
 this suffering and death upon Himself ? We will, for the 
 moment, leave it uncertain whether the Servant of the 
 Lord, portrayed in Isaiah 52: 13 to 53: 12 is one person or a 
 plural number; in either case Israel there confesses that 
 salvation and righteousness is wrought for them all 
 through the vicarious suffering and death of One who was 
 long unrecognized, and at last fully acknowledged. How 
 are these to be mentally connected? 
 
 Perhaps the following story is not inapt to afford an 
 approach to an insight into the matter. I have it from 
 Hesba Stretton, the English story-writer, who has also 
 written many other stories from which are made manifest 
 the ethical grandeur and moral value of vicarious suffer- 
 ing and death. The scene of the story which I just now 
 recall, is a greut London court, in which a countless number 
 of people lived thickly huddled together, for the most part 
 poor and morally degraded. The steward of the house 
 maintained strict government, but he was himself a rough, 
 unbelieving man. A faithful and zealous missionary had 
 for a long time left no means untried in order to bring the 
 light of the gospel to this benighted multitude. Ris cour-
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 45 
 
 age and loving tact were exhausted, when his son, a gentle 
 lad, who was gifted with a lovely voice, offered to go into 
 the court and to endeavor to touch the hearts of the inhab- 
 itants and melt them by striking up some religious songs. 
 The father knew to what danger his child exposed himself, 
 but because the salvation of men was to him more than all 
 else, he yielded at last to the impulse. The boy went day 
 after day, took his station in the middle of the court, and, 
 with a voice as clear as a bell, in which his very soul was 
 felt, began his songs of Jesus. At first there gathered 
 about him a great crowd, drawn thither by the strange 
 sight and the enjoyment of the music. But little by little, 
 as they perceived the intention of his coming, they with- 
 drew, and finally their applause turned to hatred, which 
 increased to such a pitch that at last the troublesome sing- 
 er, struck by a stone from the hand of the steward, sank 
 to the ground and was carried away as one dying. He was 
 not really so greatly injured as to die, but he was in immi- 
 nent danger of death, and this danger was enhanced by 
 his deep sorrow of soul on account of the failure of his 
 good intention and the rejection of nis kind wish. But 
 how salutary was the fruit already borne by this sacrifice 
 of self almost to death! Certainly it did not avail for all 
 without distinction, but for all those who examined them- 
 selves in the presence of this noble young life all but de- 
 stroyed. The first fruit was this: From the deadly hatred 
 with which they had requited that love whose wish was to 
 save them from their depravity, they came to the conscious- 
 ness of their guilt in all its terrible enormity and worthi- 
 ness of condemnation. The second fruit was found in this: 
 That in the bleeding head and pale face of the sufferer 
 they had before them a picture of innocence able and will- 
 ing to otfer itself a sacrifice for the guilty, an image of di- 
 vine love which seeks the lost, and a view of that true 
 righteousness, the essence of which is unselfish love. And 
 a third fruit was this: That in remorseful self -blame they 
 cried to God that He might not let the work of this long- 
 ing, self-sacrificing love, remain unavailing toward them, 
 and that He would make them partake of the righteous-
 
 40 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 ness of this just one against whom they had so grievously 
 sinned. 
 
 And now we ascend from the lower to the higher, from 
 the comparison to the Incomparable One; from this youth- 
 ful minstrel whose confession was a note from the many 
 thousand-voiced choir of believers in every age to that 
 Servant of the Lord whose very person signifies the salva- 
 tion of mankind; for the Lord says of Him, " Behold my 
 servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul de- 
 lighteth; I have put my Spirit upon him: he shall bring 
 forth judgment to the Gentiles." Isa. 42: i. We turn from 
 this youth, whom sympathy induced to rescue the dwellers 
 of a neighboring house from their estrangement from God, 
 to that Servant of the Lord who was decreed to become 
 the salvation of the world throughout its utmost extent 
 (Isa. 49: 6), and who accomplished this work as Saviour 
 with a loving tenderness which would not break the bruised 
 reed nor quench the smoking flax. Isa. 42:3. We arise in 
 thought from this child, whose zealous testimony brought 
 upon him an illness of perhaps a month, to that Servant of 
 the Lord, "a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief," 
 whose whole life was marked by sympathetic suffering, 
 and ever full of anguish; from this child whose ardent 
 love brought him near death, to that Servant of the Lord, 
 that Pierced and Bruised One who was led as a tender 
 lamb to the slaughter (1^:1.53:5-7); from this sick child 
 around whose couch, conscious of guilt, stand the inmates 
 of the premises, and even the house steward, to that Ser- 
 vant of the Lord in whose presence an entire great nation 
 confess their blindness and their sins, through which 
 they have caused his martyr death. From this we gain an 
 insight into the moral consequences of the self-sacrifice of 
 the incomparable Sufferer. In Him it may be seen of what 
 sin is capable; it outdid itself when it put to death the 
 Holy One of God as a common malefactor. His death is a 
 rful sermon on repentance. In Him it is shown of 
 what zeal for the law is capable; for it was the people of 
 the law who,from the stand-point of the law, like the friends 
 of Job, considered him rejected of God, and in fanatical
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 47 
 
 devotion to the law, dragged him to the judgment-seat. 
 In Him it is to be seen of what love is capable; for the in- 
 tensity of His love toward those who hated Him consumed 
 His life, and even when dying He still implored forgive, 
 ness for the evil doers. Isa. 53:12. But this love stood in 
 the place of heavenly love, for it was God's will to bruise 
 Him, and it was God Himself who caused Him to sink in 
 such grief.' His suffering was the means to a fore-ordained 
 end. His self-sacrifice was to become the ground of His 
 exaltation, and the foundation of a great congregation who 
 should give Him thanks for their redemption and justifi- 
 cation. Isa. 53: 10, ii. The depth of theijr iniquity was re- 
 vealed when they shed the blood of God's Chosen One; and 
 at the same time in that God-ordained, self-sacrificing love 
 there was offered to the sinners a saving hand which 
 brought to those who seized it in faith forgiveness and 
 mercy, and the gracious power to begin a new life. So we 
 see that through the work of the Servant of God, which, 
 suffering, dying, and living again, He accomplishes, there 
 is wroughtf or sinners the knowledge of themselves (repent- 
 ance), the forgiveness of sins (justification), and anew life, 
 well pleasing to God (righteousness). 
 
 "Yes," one will object, "but all that sounds exactly 
 like Christianity." Without doubt it is exactly like Chris- 
 tianity, and yet we have been especially careful not to go 
 outside the thoughts directly or implicitly contained in the 
 53d chapter of Isaiah. The Messiah, according to an older 
 conception, is a king. But, as in Psa. no, Zechariah gives 
 to the Branch the priestly crown in addition to his crown 
 asking. And to these two crowns there is added by" the 
 second Isaiah and Zechariah the crown of thorns which 
 God transforms into a more than royal crown. The pict- 
 ure of Christ on the easel of prophecy was now ready, and 
 there remained nothing except that the one there por- 
 trayed should ap*pear, and that the finger of him who stood 
 as the last of the prophets upon the confines of the two 
 great ages of the world should point to Him and say,- 
 
 nvri
 
 48 SOLEMN* QUESTIONS. 
 
 "Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin oi 
 the world! " 
 
 HITHERTO we have drawn our proofs of the fundamen- 
 tal facts and truths of Christianity exclusively from a com- 
 parison of them with the Holy Scriptures of the Old Tes- 
 tament. Now we turn our glances toward the Haggada 
 contained in the Talmud and Midrash, the evidential value 
 of which ought not to be underestimated. The strictest 
 followers of the Talmud view the Haggada, in its relation 
 to the Halacha, which fixes the sense of the law, as a purely 
 subjective and fanciful conceit. Yet, nevertheless, even 
 these seize upon the Haggada, whenever it is of value to 
 show that, far higher than the crude and early determina- 
 tion of justice limited to the Jewish nation, there is a hu- 
 mane ethics in accordance with which noble Israelites have 
 at all times acted. For example, in the Shulchan Aruch it is 
 stated as an accepted proposition of right and duty for the 
 Israelite to keep the lost property of a Gentile and not to 
 give it back; but the Haggada commends a practice far 
 above this unjust proposition, and relates that the disciples 
 of Simeon ben Shetach bought for their master, who sup- 
 ported himself by flax-combing, an ass, on whose neck they 
 found hanging a pearl. " Now," said they, "thou needest 
 no longer to worry." "But," said he, "doth the owner 
 know of it? " And when they said that he did not, he replied, 
 " Go, then, and restore it to him." Jer. Mezia, 2: 5. The 
 Haggada is full of ethical maxims and examples which 
 break through the letter of the written law and the conse- 
 quences of the traditional law, and touch the spirit of 
 Christianity and its universal and humane morality. Ac- 
 cordingly we read (Joma 23 a, etc.), " Those who allow them- 
 selves to be injured and injure not in return, those who al- 
 low themselves to be abused and abuse not in return, who 
 act from love, and rejoice in suffering, of them saith the 
 Scripture, ' Let them that love him be as the sun when he 
 goeth forth in his might.' "' Such sayings, which harmon- 
 ize with the declarations of the primitive Christian rec- 
 
 i) Judges 5: 31.
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 49 
 
 ords, are often found in the Talmud and Midrash, and how 
 often have they been offset by mediaeval fanaticism and 
 anti-Semitism! Far from lacking evidential force, the 
 Haggada is brought forward even at the present day by 
 the defenders of the Talmud and Shulchan Aruch, as a classic 
 witness to save the honor of the nation, and not alone for 
 this end, but also to take away from Christianity and its 
 great universal thoughts their priority, by referring to the 
 religio-ethical maxims, which, like pearls in a jeweler's 
 shop, are scattered partly in the tract Aboth, and elsewhere 
 throughout the Talmudic literature. We do not wish here 
 to dispute about this, but we content ourselves with the 
 remark that, with the exception of a very few declarations, 
 all these parallels to the New Testament are later than the 
 first Christian century, and, therefore, if original and in- 
 dependent, they yet follow chronologically. ^H^ 
 
 But they reason unjustly, and employ an inconsistent 
 mode of argument, who, with a proud self-consciousness, 
 exalt those parts of the Talmud and Midrash which har- 
 monize with Christian ethics, and, on the other hand, dis- 
 parage those portions which agree with the Christian doc- 
 trine, as contrary to the spirit of Judaism, and as having 
 come in through yielding to Christian influence. Nathan 
 Krochmal, in his More Nebuche Hazeman, who otherwise 
 finds sense and reason throughout the Haggada, condemns 
 these parts as mystical transcendentalism. There is a He- 
 brew pamphlet entitled hivw 1 n^V whose author has cast a 
 superficial glance at Church History, and views these Hag- 
 gadas as the mire of Christian doctrine deposited in the 
 Talmud and Midrash since the Council of Nice, A. D. 325. 
 Freer from blame is a work on this point by Rabbi Schwartz, 
 in Gablonz, which lies before me in manuscript. It sets 
 out from the proposition that since the Talmudic period 
 there arose within Judaism a two-fold tendency, one mys- 
 tical and one rationalistic. That is just. The rationalistic 
 tendency viewed a strict observance of the law which jus- 
 tines and saves, as the principal thing for the present, and 
 
 i) The Glory of Israel.
 
 50 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 all the future, and allowed to the Prophetic Word almost 
 no influence upon its thought. The Messiah, if it to any 
 extent held fast to a belief in a future Messiah, was, in its 
 view, a king who should adhere to the law and secure for 
 it a universal force. The difference between the present 
 and the Messianic future was considered simply as this, 
 that at some time the nvp^B T3JW, that is, Israel's servitude 
 beneath the Gentile world-power, would cease. Maimon- 
 ides, the later representative of this rationalistic tendency, 
 embodied the Messianic conception, rather political than 
 ethical, into his system of Talmudic law. The mystical 
 tendency, on the contrary, hoped in the Messiah a restorer 
 of what was lost through Adam in the fall, a conqueror 
 of the serpent, the mediator of an eternal redemption, and 
 the re-entering of God into human history. Its Messianic 
 idea was not merely an impression from without upon the 
 longing for freedom, but \vas drawn from the sense of sin 
 and guilt within. It is this conception of the Messiah 
 which floated before Jesus, and upon the realization of 
 which He wasted and sacrificed His life. He did not cre- 
 ate it, but only transferred it from an ideal into a reality. 
 Although it does not appear in the Jewish literature just 
 preceding Christianity, and although Jesus' disciples only 
 gradually deepened their external and rationalistic view 
 of the Messiah to this inward mystical and spiritual con- 
 ception, yet still the Raggada of the Talmud and Midrash 
 prove that it was nothing new and foreign to the Jewish 
 consciousness. Even if not national, it was by no means 
 without foundation; for the Word of God in the Old Tes- 
 tament gave it its characteristic features and color. 
 
 In the idyllic picture in the nth chapter of Isaiah, 
 which corresponds with the close of chapter 65, the prophet 
 says that when the Messianic kingdom shall be set up a 
 new order of things will ensue similar to that in Paradise, 
 before sin came bringing disharmony with the Power gov- 
 erning the world. The Midrash Bereshith Rabba,z\\. 12, finds 
 this future renewing of the world indicated in the fact 
 that the word toltdhoth (generations,) occurs but twice in 
 the Bible with a doubled \ /. <*., in Gen, 2:4 and Ruth 4: 18.
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 51 
 
 When these two passages are combined, the opinion is 
 stated, reasoning from the numerical value of the letter 
 \va\v (1=6), that the doubled 1 signifies the six things 
 which were taken from the first man, 1 and which will, one 
 day, be restored through the mediation 5 of the Messiah, the 
 son of David, who is descended from Perez, or, as is ex- 
 pressed by another teacher, "Although all things were cre- 
 ated perfect, yet, since the first man fell into sin, they 
 have come into disorder, and they will not be restored to 
 their primitive condition till the Son of Perez appears," 
 Among the six things mentioned above, which were taken 
 from Adam, is his ^J, i.e., his glorious splendor, his shining 
 exterior, which was the appearance of his innocence shin- 
 ing forth from his person; for, as is indicated in Judges 5: 
 31 and Job 14: 20, the love of God makes the countenance 
 sunny, but God's anger takes away the brightness. All this 
 agrees with the Christian conception of the work of God in 
 Christ. It begins within, unseen and spiritual, and its end 
 and culmination is a new birth (na'kivyeveffia) of the 
 earthly and heavenly world (Matt. 19:28), a restoration 
 (jTTOxaTaffTaffts) of the lost (Acts 3:21), a releasing of the 
 creature from the bondage of corruption (Rom. 8:21), pre- 
 pared and assured by means of the resurrection and ascen- 
 sion of Jesus Christ to the right hand of God. 
 
 Further, while the rationalistic conception sees in the 
 serpent of Paradise only an emblem of wicked desire, 3 that 
 of the so-called mystic conception represents it as the in- 
 strument of Samael, *'. ^., the demoniac power of evil and 
 of death, and in this sense it is often said that through the 
 counsel of the serpent 4 man brought death upon himself, 
 and that death, even if not in that special case, yet in gen- 
 eral is the result of sin. 5 Sin and death accordingly will 
 not cease till the head of the old serpent 6 is crushed, and 
 that is just what is noped in the appearance of the Messiah, 
 
 :T "?y (2 .prs-n r-s (l 
 .y-n :*' (3 
 
 .wn: TV voy2 ( 
 .Ken s^ revs p 1.5 
 ru (6
 
 52 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 as is paraphrased by the Jerusalem Targum (Gen. 3: 15 b); 
 " For them (mankind) there is no salvation, and for thee, 
 O serpent, there is no salvation; but they (mankind) will 
 one day attain comfort and restoration as far as the heel 1 
 in the days of King Messiah." As the other Jerusalem 
 Targum shows, there lies at the bottom of this the thought 
 that the struggle going on through history between the 
 serpent and mankind is marked by a continual conquest and 
 yielding, a crushing of the head, /. e., a victory of those who 
 hold fast the law of God, and a bruising of the heel, and 
 thus a yielding of those who forsake God and His law. But 
 the coming of the Messiah determines the victory, and 
 brings healing even to the bruise upon the heel, which man- 
 kind has suffered from the serpent, while the serpent him- 
 self remains under the curse. At all events the Targum 
 says that the promise interwoven in the curse of the ser- 
 pent will find its final fulfillment through the appearance 
 of the Messiah, and that is an agreement with Christianity 
 which cannot be too highly estimated. 
 
 The ancient synagogue also acknowledges the Messiah 
 as the Mediator of an eternal redemption. The Jerusalem 
 Targum, on Gen. 49: 18, designates the salvation upon 
 which the hope of the dying patriarch is fixed as the finai, 
 eternal salvation, and paraphrases it in the following lan- 
 guage : " Our father Jacob said, My soul waiteth not for 
 the redemption of Gideon, the son of Joash, for that is a 
 temporal redemption; and not for the redemption of Sam- 
 eon, the son of Manoah, for that is a redemption which will 
 come to an end; but for the redemption which Thou hast 
 promised to bring to Thy people, the children of Israel, 
 through Thy Word/ for this redemption my soul waiteth." 
 And there is added, " For Thy redemption is an eternal 
 redemption." 3 In another reading the passage signifies, 
 " No, but for the redemption of the Messiah, of the son of 
 David, who one day will redeem the children of Israel and
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 53 
 
 bring them back from exile, for this redemption waiteth 
 my soul." According to one of these readings God accom- 
 plishes this enduring redemption through His Word, 1 who 
 is the means of His revelation in the world and in history; 
 and according to the other it is through the Messiah, the 
 son of David; that is, if we combine the two readings of 
 the personal human mediator of His revelation, in whom 
 involuntaril)-this thought forces itself upon us His Word* 
 as it were, became flesh. We are very far from wishing to 
 attribute to Jewish declarations New Testament thoughts 
 in their apostolic sharpness and depth of meaning, but our 
 interes't in the difference between the two is exceeded by 
 our interest in their relative agreement. In the statement 
 of ancient Jewish doctrine one may have as his object to 
 show how different its representatives are from Christian 
 ideas, even when they apparently agree. But it is much 
 more the object of the one who states Christian doctrine, 
 especially of one who would like to win Jews to Christian- 
 ity, to show that the ancient Jewish theology (that is, that 
 theology which was not yet influenced by a tendency in 
 opposition to Christianity,) contains as an addition to the 
 Word of God in the Old Testament germs of thought,which 
 attain their development and their perfection in Christian- 
 ity, or forms of thought which Christianity has filled with 
 a new and advanced contents given by revelation. Even 
 Ferdinand Weber, in his System of the Theology of the 
 Ancient Synagogue, translated by George Schnedermann 
 and myself (1880), has, in a one-sided manner, laid too much 
 stress on the differences. He says, for example, that the 
 theology of the ancient synagogue never connected the 
 Messiah and the essential Word of God 3 at the same time 
 referring to Isa. 9: 6 and 7, where, as a seal of the prophecy 
 of the birth of the Messiah, it is stated, ''The zeal of the 
 Lord of hosts will perform this." This is rendered by the 
 Targum, "Through the Word 4 of the Lord of hosts will 
 
 1) la the New Testament through Hie AoyoS. 
 
 .K-iavu (2 
 
 .KID'O (3
 
 54 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 this be performed." But with a justice equal to that with 
 which Weber refers to the difference between Jewish and 
 Christian conceptions, and no less scientifically, we here 
 affirm the resemblance of the one to the other. For as the 
 Jewish theology, in addition to the Old Testament witness- 
 es (e.g., Psa. 33:6; 107:20), views the Word as the medium 
 of power in the creation and government of the world, so 
 does the Targum on Isa. 9:7 designate the coming of the 
 Messiah into the world as the work of God through His 
 Word, or what is the same thing, His Logos. 
 
 " The Word (oAoyos) was made flesh," says John (1:14), 
 and then continues, "and dwelt among us, . . .'full of 
 gracae and truth." Without any doubt the apostle here 
 means that in Jesus the Messiah, the divine Shechinah ap- 
 peared in human form. For the ancient Jewish theology 
 called the Shechinah 1 the dwelling of God, the presence, 
 and especially the gracious presence of God among men, 
 God Himself, as in His holiness, coming and dwelling here 
 below with His own; as is said (Abothj:j), "When two sit 
 together and discourse over the words of the law, there is 
 the Shechinah present with them." And the ancient Jew- 
 ish theology also affirms, as the end of human history, that 
 God will again make His abode with men. " The Shechi- 
 nah,." says an old Midrash ( Tanchuma, 129 b, Vienna edition), 
 "dwelt originally here below, but after Adam's fall He 
 withdrew farther and farther into heaven, and with Abra- 
 ham began His gradual return." And another Midrash 
 (Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 14), says that the Holy Scripture 
 speaks of ten descents* of God upon the earth, of which the 
 tenth is to be expected at the last time. Does not this 
 closely approach the thought that the appearance of the 
 Messiah will be the deepest descent of God into human 
 history? The Messianic names, "Immanuel," and the "Lord 
 our Righteousness," confirm this. Only the name, "Mighty 
 God " 3 (Isa. 9:6), which cannot, except with violence, be 
 explained away, thatonly passes the Jewish comprehension. 
 
 .nrsiy (1 
 
 J-IIYT (2 
 
 \ .113: "? (3
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 55 
 
 We now put together a few witnesses in regard to the 
 Messiah from the ancient synagogue, which agree with the 
 Christian testimony, except that Christianity regards 
 what was said ot the Messiah as fulfilled in Jesus. 
 
 r. As Paul says of Christ (Col. i: 16), that God created 
 all things through Him and for Him, so likewise in Be re- 
 shith rabba, ch. 2, Resh Lachish says of the Spirit which 
 brooded over the waters of chaos, " This was the Spirit of 
 King Messiah." ' 
 
 2. As Paul (Gal. 6:2,) speaks of a law of Christ, and 
 therefore of a Messianic law, whose commandments are 
 summed up in the commandment of love, born of faith, so 
 likewise we read in Jalkut on Isa., 296, that the Holy One 
 Blessed be He! intends through the Messiah to give a 
 new law. 1 
 
 3. As in Matt. 8: 17, the confession of the 53d chapter 
 of Isaiah, " Surely he hath borne our griefs and carried our 
 sorrows," is mentioned as fulfilled in Jesus; so likewise in 
 the Babylonian Talmud ( Sanhedrin 98 b, ) reference is made 
 to the Messiah as taking human sorrows upon Himself in 
 that He is considered as a sutferer, like Job and Rabbi 
 Judah the Holy. 
 
 4. As Peter, in his first Epistle (i: 19 ff), calls Christ 
 the Lamb of God " fore-ordained before the foundation of 
 the world," so likewise is it said (Pesachim 54 a] that the 
 name of the Messiah was already made (came into exist- 
 ence,) before the world was made; and in Pesikta Rabbathi 
 (Friedman's edition, p. 161,) it is said that He has taken 
 vicarious suffering upon Himself since the six days of 
 creation. 3 
 
 5. John says in his first Epistle (2: i ff), "We have an 
 Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; and 
 He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, 
 but also for the sins of the whole world." And in Jalkut 
 on Isaiah, 359, the Messiah promises to complete the work 
 of redemption destined to Him from the beginning, when 
 
 .xrr^o toStn xnn m (i 
 ..-'i-n mm (2 
 (3
 
 56 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 He says: "O Lord of the world, with inward exulting joy 
 I take it upon myself on condition that no one of Israel 
 shall be lost, and that not alone those who' live in my 
 days shall have salvation, but also those who lie in the dust 
 of the grave; and that not alone those who die in my days 
 .shall have salvation, but also those dead who have died 
 from the days of the first Adam till now, and that not 
 these only, but also that those dead-born in my days shall 
 have salvation; and not the dead-born alone, but also all 
 those whom Thou hast in mind to call into being, and those 
 not yet come into being. I will enter immediately into the 
 agreement and will take it immediately upon myself." 
 
 6. In the first Epistle of Peter (3: 18 ff), it is affirmed 
 that Christ, ''being put to death in the flesh, but quickened 
 by the Spirit," went in the Spirit "and preached unto the 
 spirits in prison;" and similar to this is what is affirmed in 
 Jalkut on Isaiah, 296, that the son of David will pray for 
 the dwellers in the underworld, and that the wicked who 
 say Amen to this prayer will by this one Amen be saved 
 from hell. 
 
 7. The Epistle to the Hebrews shows that Christ, as 
 the antitype of Melchizedek, is far above Abraham (7:4), 
 higher than Moses (3:3), higher than the angels (1:4), and 
 exactly after this manner is Isa 52: 13, explained in Jalkut, 
 238: " King Messiah will be higher than Abraham, and 
 lifted up above Moses, and will stand far higher than the 
 ministering angels. 
 
 8. In Hebrews i: 13 the question is asked, " To which 
 of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand?" 
 And in Jalkut on the Psalms, 869, we find among many 
 mistaken interpretations, the New Testament thought: 
 " One day the Holy One Blessed be He will call King 
 Messiah to sit at His right hand." So also Rabbi Akiba 
 understands the noth Psalm (Chagiga 14 i), though Rabbi 
 Joseph the Galilean, objects to this and finds in the throne 
 of the Messiah at the right hand of God a profanation of 
 the Shechinah. 
 
 9. To the question of the high priest (Mark 14: 61, 62), 
 "Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?" Jesus said,
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 57 
 
 " I am; and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right 
 hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven." Also 
 the Talmud (Sanhedrin 98 a) presupposes the Messianic 
 reference of Daniel 7:13: He it is who shall appear in the 
 clouds of heaven, or riding upon an ass; and the Targum 
 on i Chron. 34, remarks upon the name Anani, 1 " That is 
 the King Messiah, who shall one day be revealed." 
 
 10. And as Jesus declares (John 5: 25), '-Verily, verily, 
 I say unto you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the 
 dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and they that 
 hear shall live." So likewise, according to Sanhedrin 98 b, 
 the Messiah is called JW- and that too as this symbolic 
 name is explained in Pirke de Eliezer, ch. 32, and elsewhere, 
 as He who makes those who sleep in the dust of the 
 grave to germinate, that is, who awakens them to new life. 
 - "But,'' some one will perhaps object, "to put together 
 these passages gives a false impression, for they are wit- 
 nesses from different times and different books." As though 
 we did not know that! But they all belong to the Talmudic 
 period, or at least to the Talmudic literature; 3 and they all 
 belong to the time after Christ, which, far from weakening 
 the force of this testimony, only strengthens it in a manner 
 astonishing and even startling. The second possible objec- 
 tion is that " what is there said is not the confession of the 
 whole synagogue, but of single individuals." But these indi- 
 viduals are men whose authority is of the greatest weight, 
 like Resh Lachish and Rabbi Akiba, and when the same 
 declarations are found in the Targum they appear as in a 
 certain measure accepted by the consciousness of the peo- 
 ple, or at least there is a decided tendency towards such an 
 acceptance. And in the third place one may endeavor to 
 resist the impression of these evidences by bringing up 
 these points in which they differ from the Christian state- 
 ments. But what we wish to show remains unmoved, and 
 is not weakened by any of these objections. For in any 
 case this shows that the fundamental ideas of Christianity 
 
 Cloud man. 133^ (_! 
 a) Jinnon, Psa. 72: 17. ^ 
 
 3) We have intentionally omitted references to the Svhar Literature.
 
 5& SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 have their roots in Judaism, in ancient Judaism, and not in 
 that Judaism which later let go its hold of the prophetic 
 Word; and they likewise show that Christianity does not by 
 any means force upon Judaism new and foreign ideas which 
 it might not thoroughly assimilate if it only would. The 
 fundamental question is, and ever remains the question, 
 " Is Jesus the Messiah, or shall we expect another ? " 
 
 Let us look, for example, for a moment at the Targum 
 on Isa. 52: 13; 53. It begins (52: 13), " Behold, my servant, 
 the Messiah, shall do wondrous things." This personal 
 conception of the Servant of the Lord is not retained in 
 the course of the translation; the collective idea of Israel 
 enduring judgment gains finally the upper hand and the 
 representation becomes gradually secular and warlike. But 
 for our purpose it will suffice to refer to ch. 53:4, 5, where 
 the Targum translates, " He [the Messiah,] will make in- 
 tercession for our sins, and for His sake our misdeeds will 
 be forgiven, while we thought Him scourged, smitten of 
 the Lord, and loaded with afflictions, and He will build the 
 temple which was profaned by our sins, which was dis- 
 honored by our misdeeds, and by His teaching will great 
 peace come to us, and if we hear His words our sins will 
 be forgiven." The translation contains unjustifiable alter- 
 ations, but in spite of them the thought remains, which is 
 indeed the fundamental thought of Christianity, that 
 through the merits, through the word, through the inter- 
 cession of the Messiah forgiveness of sins will be wrought. 
 If then, the Jew recognizes in Jesus the Messiah, it is only 
 the Messianic hopes of the ancient synagogue which he 
 sees realized in Him. In accordance with these he may 
 confess: " He has sacrificed Himself for us, He has pro- 
 claimed to us the way of salvation, and He appears before 
 God as a high priest in our behalf." 
 
 There remains now but one more important point in 
 which the Jewish Messianic idea and the Christian con- 
 ception of Christ agree, one indeed little considered, and 
 yet very significant, and which cannot be gainsaid. 
 
 
 THE Messianic hope, as it is voiced in the Jewish liter-
 
 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 59 
 
 ature before and after Christ, exhibits different forms. It 
 is now more earthly, national and warlike; now more mys- 
 tical, universal, and ethico-religious. But there is one fun* 
 damental trait common to all the Messianic conceptions; 
 that is, the son of David, who does not transfer His do- 
 minion to a bodily successor. He is not a king, like the 
 kings of this earth, in whose stead at death there succeeds 
 a son as heir to the throne. He exists in no marriage re~ 
 lation from which spring bodily children. Furthermore, 
 there is a singlar representation according to which the 
 one Messiah is made into two; a Messiah the son of Jo- 
 seph, who was against the world-power, and a Messiah the 
 son of David, who accomplished the victory over the 
 world-power. Now these both are childless, they have no 
 sons in whom their life and work are continued. The Mes- 
 siah, the'son of David, is not the founder of a dynasty. He 
 is the sole occupant of the throne, without a change. He 
 reigns eternally. If, however, a limited continuance be as- 
 cribed to the dominion of the Messiah, then there must be 
 intended a period of time passing over into eternity. For 
 the days of the Messiah 1 belong to the future world; 2 they 
 form the transition from the temporal form of the present 
 to the eternal form of the hereafter. 
 
 Marriage is a divinely ordered institution. Without it 
 the human race cannot be perpetuated, that is, in families. 
 Therefore, especially according to the Jewish idea, mar- 
 riage is the duty of a man. But to think of the Messiah in 
 the married state does not simply contradict a cabalistic 
 exaggeration. 3 The Messiah is unmarried, as imagined 
 and represented in Jewish literature both before and after 
 Christ. And this is scriptural. For as the prophetic word 
 speaks of the ancestors (fathers) of the Messiah, but not 
 of a bodily father, only of his bodily mother (Isa. 7: 14, Mi- 
 cah 5: 2, Jer. 31: 32, cf. Isa. 49: i), so also it never speaks of 
 a spouse of the King Messiah. Whenever there is a refer- 
 
 cVyn (2 .rviyfcn fro 1 (1 
 
 3) Shabbathai Zebi married Sara, the beautiful Pole, who threw herself upon his 
 neck as the destined wife of the Messiah, but the glory of the false Messiah was by no 
 means enhanced thereby.
 
 60 SOLEMN QUESTIONS. 
 
 ence to a relation between the Messiah and a wife, this 
 wife is the church, the antitype of the Shulamite; and 
 whenever there is a reference to the children of the Mes- 
 siah, it is his people who are meant, whose Eternal Fath- 
 er 1 He is, the holy seed of those redeemed by Him. Isa. 6: 
 13: 53: io- In the passage, Psa. 45: 16 (Hebrew Bible v. 17), 
 " Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children," the Targum, 
 interpreting the psalm Messianically,renders -K^pHS 133 (thy 
 children, the righteous). For marriage, although a divine 
 institution, is, nevertheless, only an earthly and temporal 
 relation, while the Messiah is a personality lifted far above 
 earthly conditions. His feet rest on the earth, but His 
 head towers above the heavens. 
 
 Just for this reason is the government and kingdom 
 of the Messiah always designated by the prophets as eter- 
 nal. The Messiah himself is an eternal king, without a 
 successor. Isa. 9: 7, Ezek. 37: 25. And it is simply impossi- 
 ble that the Messiah should be meant by that prince in 
 Ezek. ch. 40-48, who leaves princely dignity and domain to 
 his children. The Targum deliberately translates SMfJ 2 
 in this concluding vision of Ezekiel by X3"), 3 but where the 
 Messiah is foretold by a prophet as the second David (Ezek. 
 34: 24; 37: 25), it renders the same word XD^tt. 4 It is a much 
 more self-consistent thought which the people expressed 
 when they failed to understand Jesus' prophecy of His ap- 
 proaching death: "We have heard out of the law that 
 Christ abideth forever." And so also we read in the proc- 
 lamation of the birth of Jesus (Luke 1:32, 33): "The Lord 
 God shall give unto him the throne of his father David; 
 and he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of 
 his kingdom there shall be no end." 
 
 Judaism and Christianity therefore agree in this, that 
 the Messiah is a personality, absolute and eternal, lifted far 
 above earthly family life and far above every earthly lim- 
 
 .1JP3K (1 
 
 2) The Prince. 
 
 3) Great One. 
 
 4) King.
 
 SOLEMN QUESTION?. 6l 
 
 itation. And in this all that bear the name of Christian 
 are as one. To be sure, there is just now in vogue in the 
 Christian world a theology which affords to Judaism weap- 
 ons both offensive and defensive against the doctrine of 
 the church and against the historical character of our re- 
 ligious documents; but we may, nevertheless, comfort our- 
 selves in the midst of all this confusion, sure that this as- 
 sistance will not suffice for the justification of Judaism. 
 For in Christianity one may occupy the Unitarian, the trin- 
 itarian, the rationalistic, or the supernatural stand-point? 
 but it always will remain that Christianity is the religion 
 of completed ethics, and that Jesus is the great, holy, and 
 divine Man, whose appearance on earth divides the history 
 of the world. And we ma}' regard the mystery of the 
 atonement as we will, it will, nevertheless, always remain 
 that the blood of this Jesus, who is the antitype of Abel, 
 the slain innocent, speaketh better things than that of 
 Abel, since it asks not vengeance, but favor, for the guilty. 
 There has recently appeared a publication bearing the 
 title, " Undogmatic Christianity." In this the question is 
 raised in reference to the gospel critics, how anything 
 which is the subject and product of scientific inquiry can be 
 the foundation of an assured religious faith. The answer is, 
 that this consideration disappears if we withdraw into the 
 innermost depths of the holy character of Christ, " who is 
 far above all the fluctuations of theology and historical 
 science, just as a lofty mountain peak lifts itself above the 
 clouds. For has it ever been doubted that He was uncon- 
 ditionally obedient to His heavenly Father, He who, lov- 
 ing His brethren with an undying love, was faithful even 
 unto death, He who, never moved by temptation and never 
 embittered by ingratitude, was incomparable in the fear- 
 less truthfulness of His soul, and in His gentle meekness, 
 He who was led patient as a lamb to the slaughter praying 
 for His murderers? Therefore from the time of His so- 
 journ upon earth to the present day, He has won mankind, 
 has conquered their most stubborn resistance, and has led 
 them in countless numbers to God. This character, won- 
 drous in its simplicity, influences us all, whether condemn-
 
 62 SOI. KM X 
 
 ing- or inspiring us. He accompanies us in all relations of 
 life, and in all conditions of feeling, as the pole-star the 
 nightly wanderer. No one into whose consciousness He 
 once has come is free as before. The Christ who accom- 
 plishes this down to the present day, and to all eternity, 
 we must call the historic Christ, for he calls forth again 
 and again the mightiest historical forces." 
 
 This is true, but the historic forces go yet deeper. He 
 is surely the living ideal of noble humanity which has ris- 
 en upon men and has poured His light and warmth upon 
 them. But He is more than that; He is the Christ, the goal 
 of the words and ways of God in the Old Testament. He 
 is the Mediator between God and man, between Israelite 
 and Gentile, between heaven and earth, and between time 
 and eternity. Having passed through death into glory, 
 He has laid the foundation of the kingdom of God, the 
 completion of which is assured because thus laid. When 
 once Israel shall greet him with a better Hosanna than the 
 first, 1 then, and not' till then, will the consummation of this 
 divine kingdom draw near. 
 
 "God hath concluded them all in unbelief," says the 
 apostle in reference to Israel, " that He might have mercy 
 upon all." Rom. 11:32. Brethren of the house of Israel! 
 at last now break through the ban of unbelief, ere mercy 
 shall have run her course. 
 
 i) Matt. 23: 39.
 
 CORRIGENDA. 
 
 PAGE. 
 
 8, 
 
 lines 21 and 
 
 22, for 
 
 fasiaation 
 
 read 
 
 fascination. 
 
 15, 
 
 foot-note 1, 
 
 ( 
 
 D3TI 
 
 M 
 
 DDR. " 
 
 16, 
 
 " 2, 
 
 u 
 
 CPKTJ3 
 
 (t 
 
 B^nis. 
 
 18, 
 
 " 1, 
 
 a 
 
 p4m 
 
 M 
 
 irns twice. 
 
 39, 
 
 lines 19 and 
 
 20 " 
 
 Psa. 139 
 
 II 
 
 Psa. 130. 
 
 51, 
 
 foot-note 5, 
 
 u 
 
 Ron 
 
 u 
 
 SS- 
 
 53, 
 
 " 4, 
 
 tl 
 
 s--: > o3 
 
 K 
 
 KT3-03. 
 
 55, 
 
 " 1, 
 
 M 
 
 win 
 
 U 
 
 imn 
 
 55, 
 
 " 3, 
 
 H 
 
 rrtwna 
 
 H 
 
 n^i3. 
 
 56, 
 
 line 25, 
 
 it 
 
 238 
 
 U 
 
 338. 
 
 56, 
 
 " 34, 
 
 U 
 
 in 
 
 H 
 
 11- a.
 
 'EDUTH LE ISRAEL," 
 
 . 
 (Witness to Israel,) 
 
 A Hebrew monthly devoted to the furtherance of mo.al 
 and religious life amongst the Jcics. 
 
 EDITOR, 
 
 -M. LOEWEN,- 
 
 Kampiana Street 3. Lemberg, Gallzicr. 
 
 THE PECULIAR PEOPLE, 
 j ) ' v j } 
 
 ^L CHRISTIAN MONTHLY, 
 
 DEVOTED TO JEWISH INTERESTS. 
 
 THE REV. WILLIAM C. DAL AND, 
 
 LEONARDSVILLE, N. Y. 
 
 EDITOR, 
 
 Published by the American Sabbath Tract Society, Alfred Centre, -Yew York.
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 Los Angeles 
 
 rlEC'DYRl 
 
 University of California 
 
 SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 305 De Neve Drive - Parking Lot 17 Box 951388 
 
 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1388 
 
 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. 
 
 Hi 
 
 Form L9-Si
 
 SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY