/ 
 
Issued June 11, 1912. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
 
 FOREST SERVICE. 
 
 HENRY S. GRAVES, Forester. 
 
 FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY SERIES. 
 
 EXPERIMENTS WITH 
 
 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR 
 
 MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 BY 
 
 J. H. THICKENS, . ?snr y 
 
 Chemical Engineer in Forest Products. 
 
 WASHINGTON: 
 
 GOVERNMENT 'PRINTING OFFICE. 
 1912. 
 
Rwsest ef*Ic5* W^S.^Ifi.cf AgriooJture jVlechanical Pulp 
 
 PLATE I. 
 
 FIG. 1 .MOTOR GENERATOR SET AND SWITCHBOARD. 
 
 FIG. 2. -GRINDER AND WET-MACHINE ROOM. 
 
Issued June il, 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
 
 FOREST SERVICE. 
 
 HENRY S. GRAVES, Forester. 
 
 FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY SERIES. 
 
 EXPERIMENTS WITH 
 
 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR 
 
 MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 BY 
 
 J. H. THICKENS, 
 // 
 
 Chemical Engineer in Forest Products. 
 
 WASHINGTON: 
 
 GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 
 1912. 
 
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 
 
 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
 
 FOREST SERVICE, 
 Washington, D. 0., December 13, 1911. 
 
 SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith a manuscript entitled 
 " Experiments with Jack Pine and Hemlock for Mechanical Pulp," 
 by J. H. Thickens, chemical engineer in forest products, and to 
 recommend its publication. 
 
 Respectfully, HENRY S. GRAVES, 
 
 Forester. 
 Hon. JAMES WILSON, 
 
 Secretary of Agriculture. 
 2 
 

 CONTENTS. 
 
 Page. 
 
 Need of a substitute for spruce pulp wood 5 
 
 Results of experiments 6 
 
 Why jack pine and hemlock have not been used for pulp 7 
 
 Equipment used in the experiments 8 
 
 Electrical equipment 8 
 
 Pulp machinery and auxiliary equipment 8 
 
 Methods employed .* 10 
 
 Qualitative and quantitative tests 10 
 
 Commercial tests 10 
 
 Treatment of the wood before grinding 10 
 
 Grinding 11 
 
 Losses in grinding 12 
 
 Fiber study 12 
 
 Calculation of results 12 
 
 Comparison of yields 13 
 
 Factors which influence quality and production 15 
 
 Speed and pressure 15 
 
 Surface of stone 16 
 
 Temperature 18 
 
 Undetermined factors 18 
 
 Microscopic comparison of experimental pulps and commercial standards 18 
 
 Standard pulps 18 
 
 Jack pine pulp 20 
 
 Hemlock pulp 21 
 
 Mixed pulps 21 
 
 Samples of paper produced 22 
 
 Summary of data 23 
 
 3 
 
 477631 
 
L LUSTRATIONS. 
 
 PLATES. 
 
 Page. 
 PLATE I. Fig. 1. Motor generator set and switchboard. Fig. 2. Grinder and 
 
 wet-machine room Frontispiece. 
 
 II. Fig. 1. Natural surface of stone (jack pine run No. 2). Fig. 2. Ten 
 to the inch solid, straight-cut burr (hemlock run No. 0). Fig. 3. 
 Eight to the inch solid, spiral burr (hemlock run No. 43) 8 
 
 III. Fig. 1. Three to the inch solid, straight-cut burr (hemlock run No. 
 
 46). Fig. 2. Three to the inch solid, straight-cut burr, cut over 
 with 12 to the inch solid, spiral burr (hemlock run No. 51). Fig. 
 3. Six to the inch diamond-point burr (jack pine run No. 17-1) . . 8 
 
 IV. Fig. 1. Spruce sulphite standard. Fig. 2. Spruce ground wood, 
 
 No. 1 standard 16 
 
 V. Fig. 1. Spruce ground wood, No. 2 standard. Fig. 2. Spruce 
 
 ground wood, No. 3 standard, coarse ground 16 
 
 VI. Fig. 1. Spruce ground wood, No. 4 standard, medium ground. 
 
 Fig. 2. Spruce ground wood, No. 5 standard, fine ground 16 
 
 VII. Comparison of hemlock pulps ground at different speeds. Fig. 1. 
 100 revolutions per minute (run No. 35). Fig. 2. 150 revolutions 
 per minute (run No. 36). Fig. 3. 200 revolutions per minute 
 
 (run No. 37) 16 
 
 VIII. Comparison of jack pine pulps ground at different speeds. Fig. 1. 
 152 revolutions per minute (run No. 19). Fig. 2. 205 revolu- 
 tions per minute (run No. 20-1) 16 
 
 IX. Fig. 1. Jack pine ground wood (run No. 14-1). Fig. 2. Jack pine 
 
 ground wood (run No. 13-1) '. . ' 16 
 
 X. Fig. 1. Jack pine ground wood (run No. 7-1). Fig. 2. Jack pine 
 
 ground wood (commercial run No. 24) :V 16 
 
 XI. Fig. 1. Hemlock ground wood (run No. 41). Fig. 2. Hemlock 
 
 ground wood (commercial run No. 14-1) 16 
 
 XII. Fig. 1. Hemlock ground wood (commercial run No. 8). Fig. 2. 
 
 Hemlock ground wood (run No. 2) 16 
 
 XIII. Fig. 1. Hemlock ground wood (commercial run No. 30). Fig. 2. 
 
 Hemlock ground wood (commercial run No. 50). (Used in accom- 
 panying paper sample) 16 
 
 XIV. Fig. 1. Ground-wood pulp, one-third spruce, two-thirds hemlock 
 
 (run No. 46a). Fig. 2. Ground-wood pulp, all hemlock (run No. 
 
 466). Fig. 3. Ground-wood pulp, all spruce (run No. 46c) 16 
 
 XV. Mixed ground-wood pulps (used in accompanying paper samples). 
 Fig. 1. One-third spruce, two- thirds hemlock (commercial run 
 No. 46a). Fig. 2. One-third hemlock, one-third jack pine, one- 
 third spruce (commercial run No. 51). Fig. 3. One-third jack 
 pine, two-thirds hemlock (commercial run No. 52) 16 
 
 TEXT FIGURE. 
 
 FIG. 1. Portion of a chart from a recording wattmeter, showing decreased power 
 
 consumption after removal of load from pocket and pocket binding. . . 14 
 4 
 
EXPERIMENTS WITH JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR 
 MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 NEED OF A SUBSTITUTE FOB SPRUCE PULPWOOD. 
 
 Few well-established industries have expanded as rapidly as has the 
 pulp and paper industry. In less than a decade the amount of raw 
 material used annually has more than doubled. During 1900 l 
 there were consumed in the United States 1,986,310 cords of pulp- 
 wood. The ground-wood process used 598,229 cords of domestic 
 spruce, 120,820 cords of imported spruce, and 67,791 cords of other 
 woods, such as hemlock, jack pine, poplar, and balsam, or a total of 
 786,840 cords. During 1909 2 the amount of wood used in all proc- 
 esses was 4,001,607 cords, the ground-wood process using a total of 
 1,246,121 cords, which consisted of 806,282 cords of domestic spruce, 
 317,289 cords of imported spruce, and 122,550 cords of other miscel- 
 laneous woods. 
 
 Thus the increase in the total amount of pulpwood used during this 
 period was 101 per cent, while the amount of pulpwood of all kinds 
 used for ground wood increased 58J per cent. The domestic spruce 
 consumption for this purpose increased 35 per cent and the con- 
 sumption of miscellaneous woods 80.5 per cent. But the largest 
 increase was in the use of imported spruce, the consumption of which 
 increased 162 per cent. 
 
 The price of spruce has increased at a very rapid rate. In 1900 the 
 average cost of spruce used in all processes in the United States was 
 $4.83 per cord for domestic spruce and $6.50 for imported, while in 
 1909 the average price of domestic spruce was $9.32 and of imported 
 $11.34 per cord. 
 
 This increase has been reflected in the cost of ground-wood pulp. 
 The manufacturing cost of pulp, as determined by the Tariff Board, 3 
 increased from $10.84 per ton in 1900 to $16.58 in 1909, 93 per cent of 
 this increase being accounted for by the greater cost of the wood used. 
 Manifestly, therefore, it is almost essential, if the ground-wood 
 
 i Twelfth Census of the United States. 
 a " Pulpwood consumption, 1909," Bureau of the Census. 
 
 3 Report by the Tariff Board relative to pulp and news print paper industry, Senate Document No. 31, 
 Sixty-second Congress, first session. 
 
 5 
 
8 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 industry is to centime, that substitutes be found for spruce pulp, 
 especially in the manufacture of news, wrapping, and other of the 
 cheaper grades of paper. To determine whether there are not other 
 domestic species which will produce a commercial grade of ground 
 wood suitable for the purpose, etc., the Forest Service, in cooperation 
 with the American Pulp and Paper Association, began an extensive 
 series of tests on several of the woods which occur in large quantities 
 in the United States, particularly in the Lake States. The woods 
 which have been tried up to the present are hemlock and jack pine, 
 together with a small amount of spruce, for the purpose of comparison. 
 The experiments were conducted at Wausau, Wis., under the 
 general supervision of the director and assistant director of the 
 Forest Products Laboratory, and an advisory committee of the 
 American Pulp and Paper Association, composed of Messrs. G. F. 
 Steele, chairman Nekoosa-Edwards- Paper Co.; W. G. McNaughton, 
 secretary Nekoosa-Ed wards Paper Co. ; D. C. Everest, Marathon 
 Paper Mills Co.; W. L. Edmonds, Wausau Paper Mills Co.; A. M. 
 Pride, Tomahawk Paper Co. ; and Wm. Eibel, Rhinelander Paper Co. 
 
 RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS. 
 
 Not only have very promising sheets of pulp been obtained from 
 both the hemlock and jack pine, but paper has been made from 
 them on commercial machines, operating at high speed, and under 
 all other conditions of actual commercial practice, which has the 
 strength, finish, and appearance of standard news paper. The 
 production per grinder, the horsepower consumption per ton, and 
 the yield per cord approximate the averages which obtain in the 
 grinding of spruce. Again, pulps composed of mixtures of hemlock, 
 spruce, and jack pine in different proportions have been obtained, 
 which compare very favorably with the ordinary spruce ground wood. 
 
 Hemlock ground wood has a decided reddish tinge, though this is 
 not very noticeable, even in an all-hemlock sheet of news paper. 
 Jack pine pulp is also slightly off in color, but is not nearly as dark 
 as hemlock pulp. Careful study by experts should make it possible 
 to bring the color of the paper produced from these pulps more 
 nearly to the usual white. As it is, the sheets of news paper which 
 have been secured are only slightly off color, though they are the 
 result in each case of but a single attempt to secure the standard 
 degree of whiteness. 
 
 Since the experiments on hemlock have brought out a number of 
 points in favor of the grinding of that wood, two paper-mill com- 
 panies have signified their intention of using it in their cheaper grades 
 of paper. One of these mills has already begun to do so, and is well 
 satisfied with the pulp obtained. 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 7 
 
 WHY JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK HAVE NOT FEEN USED. 
 
 There is much doubt as to exactly why the pulp industry has 
 neglected to use hemlock and jack pine for the cheaper grades of 
 paper. It seems to be the general impression that hemlock grinds 
 so fine and short that there is a great loss in conversion. It has been 
 said that the yield obtained is in many instances only three-fifths of 
 that from an equal amount of spruce. This loss in grinding hemlock 
 has not been in evidence during the tests. 
 
 The pitch in jack pine is undoubtedly responsible for the lack of 
 attention paid to that wood. This, however, can be removed by 
 steaming or soaking, and such treatments will be taken up in future 
 experiments. 
 
 In all the experiments the yields secured from the different woods 
 were in direct proportion to their bone-dry weight per cubic foot. 
 It is therefore to be expected that the yields from jack pine and 
 hemlock will be less per unit of volume than those from spruce, since 
 the two first woods are considerably lighter in weight. On the basis 
 of weight, however, there appears to be relatively little more loss in 
 converting hemlock or jack pine into pulp than in converting spruce. 
 
 The fiber obtained from the ground hemlock and jack pine has 
 been considered unsatisfactory on account of its shortness. Yet it 
 has been found long enough for use in cheap papers. . 
 
 One who is accustomed to handling spruce ground wood will not 
 be favorably impressed with the appearance of either hemlock or 
 jack pine pulp. This is particularly true of the hemlock sheet. 
 Both pulps are somewhat softer in texture than spruce, and, alto- 
 gether, are not as pleasing in appearance as the present commercial 
 product. 
 
 Another point which may account for the lack of attention paid 
 to hemlock and jack pine is the care which must be exercised in 
 grinding them. It is possible to obtain a grade of pulp from spruce 
 which is suitable for most purposes without using a great deal of 
 care in the preparation of the surface of the pulp stones. In the 
 grinding of jack pine and hemlock, especially hemlock, on the other 
 hand, great care must be exercised in bringing the stone to the correct 
 degree of sharpness, since these woods will grind to powder if the 
 surface is as sharp as the one ordinarily employed in grinding spruce. 
 
 Yet notwithstanding certain shortcomings the fact remains that 
 it is possible to obtain hemlock and jack pine pulps commercially 
 which are suitable for the cheaper grades of paper. 
 
8 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 EQUIPMENT USED IN THE EXPERIMENTS. 
 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 
 
 To study accurately the fundamental variables of grinding it was 
 necessary to install an elaborate electrical drive and apparatus for 
 control and manipulation. There has also been provided a system 
 of recording instruments for the determination of speed, pressure, 
 and load fluctuation. The electrical apparatus consists of a motor- 
 generator set and a direct-current variable-speed motor. The 
 variable-speed motor, direct connected to the pulp grinder, is rated 
 at 225 horsepower at 100 revolutions per minute and 500 horsepower 
 at 300 revolutions per minute, with a 50 per cent overload capacity 
 at all speeds. However, it is possible to obtain about 25 per cent 
 more capacity than the rating. Variation in speed is obtained by 
 variation of voltage applied to the motor armature, and by means 
 of a rheostat in the field circuit of the generator it is possible to 
 maintain this voltage at any point desired, thus giving a very con- 
 stant speed. 
 
 The efficiency of the grinder motor has been determined for all 
 values of speed and load throughout the range of usage. Conse- 
 quently, the power applied to the grinder at any value of peripheral 
 speed or at any pressure on the cylinders can be calculated. 
 
 Individual motor drives have also been installed for the various 
 other pieces of pulp-making machinery and their auxiliary apparatus. 
 The machines for wood preparation and the wet-machine vacuum 
 pump are the only ones which are not direct connected to indi- 
 vidual motors. In several cases variable-speed motors have been 
 installed to permit adjustment of speed to the most effective value. 
 
 PULP MACHINERY AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT. 
 
 The pulp-making machinery, machines for wood preparation, and 
 the auxiliary pieces of apparatus are all of standard commercial 
 types and were loaned by the following manufacturers or others 
 interested in the work of the laboratory: 
 
 Grinder Friction Pulley and Machine Works. 
 
 Wet machine Improved Paper Machinery Co. 
 
 Flat screen Harmon Machine Co. 
 
 Ruth centrifugal screen H. L. Orrman & Co. 
 
 5 by 8 inch triplex pump Goulds Manufacturing Co. 
 
 4 by 6 inch triplex pump Do. 
 
 5-inch centrifugal pump Do . 
 
 4-inch centrifugal pump Do. 
 
 Storage tank Valley Iron Works. 
 
 Barker. . . .'..... Green Bay Foundry and Machine Works. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE II. 
 
 FIG. 1. NATURAL SURFACE OF STONE. (JACK PINE RUN No. 2.) 
 
 FIG. 2. TEN TO THE INCH SOLID; STRAIGHT-CUT BURR. (HEMLOCK RUN No. 0.) 
 
 FIG. 3. EIGHT TO THE INCH SOLID; SPIRAL BURR. (HEMLOCK RUN No. 43.; 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. PLATE III. 
 
 FIG. 1. THREE TO THE INCH SOLID; STRAIGHT-CUT BURR. (HEMLOCK RUN No. 46.) 
 
 FIG. 2. THREE TO THE INCH SOLID; STRAIGHT-CUT BURR. CUT OVER WITH TWELVE 
 TO THE INCH SOLID; SPIRAL BURR. (HEMLOCK RUN NO. 51.) 
 
 
 FIG. 3. Six TO THE INCH DIAMOND POINT BURR. (JACK PINE RUN No. 17-1.) 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 9 
 
 Swing cut-off saw American Pulp and Paper Association. 
 
 3-ton scale Paper (Inc.). 
 
 2 Ash ton relief valves Do. 
 
 1 pulp truck W. A. Lounsberry & Co. 
 
 1 wood truck Do. 
 
 1 54 by 27 inch pulp stone Manufacturers' Paper Co. 
 
 12 42-inch screen plates Union Screen Plate Co. 
 
 1 wet-machine felt Albany Felt Co. 
 
 1 wet-machine felt Appleton Woolen Mills. 
 
 1 set barker knives Dowd Knife Works. 
 
 1 set sectional and solid burrs. .Ticonderoga Machine Works. 
 
 Plate I shows a portion of the pulp-making equipment. The 
 grinder (PL I, fig. 2) has three pockets, the cylinders are 14 inches 
 in diameter, and it is designed for a 54 by 27 inch pulp stone. Each 
 of the grinder cylinders is equipped with a pressure gauge, and the 
 pressure line between the triplex pumps and the grinder is provided 
 with Ashton relief valves, which make it possible to obtain very 
 uniform pressures up to 100 pounds per square inch. 
 
 A recording thermometer gives a record of the temperature in the 
 grinder pit. From the grinder pit the pulp is passed through a 
 mechanically agitated sliver screen, then pumped to a storage tank 
 by means of a 6-inch centrifugal pump, and from there pumped to a 
 centrifugal screen. A variable-speed motor direct connected to the 
 screen makes it possible to obtain speeds of rotation from 400 to 600 
 revolutions per minute. Throughout the tests, however, the speed 
 was maintained at 500 revolutions per minute. The plate in the 
 centrifugal screen is perforated with holes 0.065 inch in diameter. 
 The tailings from it are led by gravity to a 12-plate horizontal dia- 
 phragm screen, the plates of which are the Union Screen Plate Go's, 
 type B, cut with 0.012-inch slots. 
 
 The good pulps from the centrifugal and the plate screens are 
 united in the vat of the wet machine, which is direct connected to a 
 variable-speed motor giving felt speeds ranging from 75 to 115 feet 
 per minute. The wet machine is provided with a small triplex pump 
 by which the cylinders connected to the press rolls are operated, the 
 dryness of the pulp being determined by the pressure applied to the 
 cylinders. A vacuum of from 10 to 15 inches, produced by a rotary 
 suction pump, is maintained on the felt, and this, too, assists in 
 obtaining the desired dryness of the pulp. The white water from 
 the wet-machine vat is pumped back to the grinder sliver screen by a 
 4-inch centrifugal pump. White water from the felts is run directly 
 to the sewer, as is also the white water from the felt suction. Plate 
 I, figure 2, gives an idea of the general arrangement of the pulp- 
 making machinery. A 40-inch swing cut-off saw and a Green Bay 
 wood barker are used to prepare the wood. 
 
10 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 METHODS EMPLOYED. 
 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE TESTS. 
 
 In order to cover the field in a reasonable length of time, short tests 
 ranging up to two hours in length were run. In these tests no attempt 
 was made to cover every point, the object being to touch only such 
 as were thought to have a marked effect on the quality of the product. 
 The surface of the stone, the pressure on the grinder cylinder, and 
 the peripheral speed of the stone were the variables which received 
 most attention. No especial attention was given to economic con- 
 siderations. 
 
 Tests were made with pressures of from 20 to 75 pounds per square 
 inch on the cylinder, corresponding to from 8.2 to 30.8 pounds per 
 square inch of pocket area. The speed of rotation of the stone was 
 varied from 84 to 225 revolutions per minute, corresponding to a 
 range in peripheral speed of from 1,173 to 3,150 feet per minute. 
 
 In studying the effect of the surface condition of the stone it was 
 necessary to utilize burrs of many different types and designs. 
 These ranged in fineness of cut from 12 to the inch to 3 to the inch. 
 The style of cut differed also, spiral cut, diamond points, and straight 
 cut being employed. The power applied to the grinder ranged from 
 87.3 to 520 horsepower, while the rate of production of bone-dry 
 pulp varied from 1 ton to 7.3 tons in 24 hours. It should be under- 
 stood that neither the two minimum nor the two maximum values 
 were necessarily obtained from the same test. When the power 
 applied to the grinder was 87.3 horsepower, for instance, it does not 
 necessarily follow that the production was 1 ton per day. The horse- 
 power consumption per ton under the given conditions was found to 
 vary from 68.3 to 196 in 24 hours. 
 
 The samples of pulp obtained during the qualitative and quanti- 
 tative tests were examined and commented upon by members of the 
 advisory committee of the American Pulp and Paper Association, and 
 those runs considered most promising were duplicated later in 
 commercial tests. 
 
 COMMERCIAL TESTS. 
 TREATMENT OF THE WOOD BEFORE GRINDING. 
 
 All of the wood used in the tests was cut either in Wisconsin or 
 Michigan and was representative of the species. In some cases the 
 wood was secured directly from the forest, while in others it was 
 shipped to the laboratory from near-by mills. Upon arrival at the 
 laboratory the logs were closely piled on skids. An attempt was made 
 to keep the material green by painting the ends with paraffin, but this 
 proved unsatisfactory, because the paraffin peeled off. The wood 
 tested was taken directly from the piles for all tests up to and includ- 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOB MECHANICAL PULP. 11 
 
 ing run No. 52 of the hemlock series, with the exception of runs Nos. 
 49, 50, and 51, the wood for which was soaked in the pond for approxi- 
 mately two months before being used. The only jack pine soaked 
 was that used in the commercial test on seasoned wood of that spe- 
 cies run 14. The jack pine and spruce used in tests on mixed pulps 
 were in all cases dry before grinding. The wood for the tests was 
 prepared approximately 2 cords at a time, sawed into 2-foot lengths, 
 barked, weighed, and piled up for the grinding process. 
 
 To determine accurately the yield, the bone-dry weight per cubic 
 foot of wood, as well as the percentage of moisture present, was 
 determined in each commercial test. All weighings were made in 
 500 or 1,000 pound lots, and the wood was used as soon as ground. 
 
 No attempt was made to remove knots or punky portions of the 
 wood. In fact, all of the tests were carried on in accordance with 
 the usual commercial practice. 
 
 GRINDING. 
 
 Before commencing the grinding tests an impression of the surface 
 of the stone which had been selected was taken by means of a piece 
 of carbon paper and a sheet of coated paper. This impression was 
 later photographed, as shown in Plates II and III. In these the 
 black dots represent projecting points and the white portions 
 between them depressions in the stone. The surface shown in Plate 
 III, figure 2, is particularly interesting, since it is the result of dressing 
 with two different kinds of burrs. 
 
 Before starting the tests the recording thermometer and all of the 
 other recording instruments were placed in operation. The pockets 
 of the grinder were filled, the pressure adjusted to the proper value, 
 and the grinder started. 
 
 For the purpose of check and control, regular readings were taken 
 of the various switchboard instruments, the indicating tachometer, 
 the pressure gauges, and the recording thermometer. On short tests 
 up to 2 hours in length these readings were recorded at 5-minute 
 intervals, but on longer tests the interval was increased to 15 minutes. 
 The speed, pressure, and other variables were maintained as nearly 
 constant as possible. For instance, when one of the grinder pistons 
 was raised the speed was brought back to the desired value by 
 manipulation of the rheostat controlling the motor armature voltage. 
 
 During the qualitative and quantitative tests the pulp stone did not 
 have an opportunity to heat up, and, in consequence, some of the 
 data on power consumption and production may be more or less 
 questionable. In the commercial tests, however, all of which were 
 made under the hot-grinding process, the stone was brought up to a 
 high temperature, which was maintained throughout the run; con- 
 sequently these more nearly approximate commercial conditions. 
 
12 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 LOSSES IN GRINDING. 
 
 To determine approximately the losses occurring in the conversion 
 of wood to pulp, the bone-dry weight of screenings obtained from a 
 known amount of bone-dry wood was determined. The loss in the 
 white water was then taken as the difference between the bone-dry 
 weight of the wood ground and the bone-dry weight of the pulp 
 secured plus the screenings. 
 
 FIBER STUDY. 
 
 During each test the character of fiber obtained was examined by 
 means of an apparatus for microscopic study. This consists of an 
 ordinary stereopticon provided with a specially constructed carrier 
 for microscopic slides. Samples of wet pulp were taken from the 
 wet-machine vat and slides were made by first removing the water 
 by drying, then staining with Bismarck brown, and moistening with 
 glycerine. The mixture of glycerine and fiber was teased out to 
 cover the area of an ordinary microscopic cover glass, which was 
 placed over the mixture. Evaporation or leakage was prevented by 
 means of a thin strip of shellac around the edge of the cover glass. 
 
 With this apparatus it was also possible to compare different 
 samples of pulp with the commercial standards used, the latter being 
 selected from a large number of samples submitted by American 
 manufacturers of ground- wood pulp. 
 
 CALCULATION OF RESULTS. 
 
 To give a clear understanding of the method employed in calcu- 
 lating the various items in connection with a test, all the calculations 
 for a representative run, No. 50, Table 4, are given here. Consid- 
 erable data taken during the tests have been eliminated from the 
 compilation, since they have no direct bearing on the study. 
 
 The test mentioned required 3.42 hours to complete, and during 
 that time 3,388 pounds of hemlock wood were ground. For com- 
 parison all of the figures on weight of wood were brought to a 
 bone-dry basis. The bone-dry weight of wood was secured by 
 drying a known volume of wood to constant weight and calculating 
 the weight per cubic foot. By calculating the bone-dry weight of a 
 log of measured volume and subtracting this amount from the actual 
 weight of the log, the' moisture content of the wood was determined. 
 The bone-dry weight of this wood, per cubic foot, was 24.84 pounds, 
 and the moisture content was 46.5 per cent; consequently the amount 
 of bone-dry wood ground was 53.5 per cent of 3,388, or 1,810 pounds. 
 This is equivalent to 72.9 cubic feet of solid wood ground during the 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 13 
 
 given period; or, in other words, the grinding was carried on at the 
 rate of 512 cubic feet of solid wood in 24 hours. 
 
 The amount of wet pulp obtained during the test was 3,795 pounds, 
 and this upon analysis was found to have a moisture content of 60.22 
 per cent. Consequently, 1,507 pounds of bone-dry pulp were 
 obtained during the period of test, corresponding to a production of 
 
 or 5 - 3 tons * n 24 hours. To grind the wood and pro- 
 
 duce this pulp it was necessary to apply to the grinder motor power 
 which averaged 338 kilowatts. This value was obtained by dividing 
 the total number of kilowatt hours used, as given by a watt-hour 
 meter, by the length of the test in hours. Figure 1 shows a section of 
 a wattmeter record obtained during this test, and illustrates how the 
 power used by the grinder varied upon the removal of the load from 
 one of the grinder pockets. The entire recording wattmeter curve 
 was averaged by means of a planimeter, in order to check the value 
 of power consumed as given by the watt-hour meter. 
 
 By using curves which show the losses in the motor it was found 
 that 15.3 kilowatts were required to supply the heat losses in the 
 grinder-motor armature and 7.1 kilowatts to supply the stray power 
 losses, making a total of 22.4 kilowatts lost in converting the power 
 from electrical to mechanical. This amount subtracted from 338 
 kilowatts gives 315.6 kilowatts which were furnished to the grinder 
 pulpstone, and 315.6 divided by 0.746 1 gives the value of 422J horse- 
 power applied to the grinder. In order, then, to obtain 5.3 tons of 
 bone-dry pulp in 24 hours it was necessary to apply to the grinder 
 over that period 422 J horsepower, or the horsepower consumption 
 per ton was 422J divided by 5.3, or 79.7 horsepower per ton in 24 
 hours. 
 
 The yield from 100 cubic feet of solid wood was obtained by dividing 
 the amount of pulp produced during 24 hours, 5.3 tons or 10,600 
 pounds, by the number of hundreds of cubic feet of wood ground in 
 24 hours, viz, 5.12. The result is 2,070 pounds. 
 
 The average temperature of grinding was determined by reading 
 the recording thermometer every five minutes, adding these values, 
 and dividing by the total number of readings. 
 
 COMPARISON OF YIELDS. 
 
 Much importance is attached to the amount of pulp obtained 
 from a cord of wood, because this represents the efficiency of con- 
 version. Commercial practice in the manufacture of spruce ground 
 wood requires a yield of approximately 2,300 pounds per cord of 
 
 i A horsepower is equivalent to 0.-746 kilowatt. 
 
14 
 
 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP, 
 
 rossed wood, or 1,800 pounds per cord of rough wood. The average 
 yields which have been obtained for hemlock and jack pine, together 
 
 KILOWATTS. 
 
 FIG. 1. Portion of chart from recording wattmeter, showing decreased power consumption after removal 
 of load frojuti pocket and pocket binding. 
 
 with those obtained for two different shipments of spruce, are given 
 in Table 1. 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 TABLE 1. Average yields from spruce, hemlock, and jack pine. 
 
 15 
 
 Species. 
 
 Weight per 
 100 cu. ft. 
 bone-dry. 
 
 Yield per 
 100 cu. ft. 
 of solid 
 wood. 
 
 Efficiency 
 of 
 conversion. 
 
 Spruce 
 
 Pounds. 
 
 2,840 
 
 Pounds. 
 2 480 
 
 Per cent. 
 87 3 
 
 Do 
 
 2,270 
 
 2,000 
 
 88 2 
 
 Hemlock 
 
 2,480 
 
 2 100 
 
 84 8 
 
 Jack pine 
 
 2 540 
 
 2 200 
 
 86 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 One hundred cubic feet of solid wood was selected as the basis of 
 yield, since it eliminates the variable loss in barking, and represents 
 fairly well the amount of solid wood in a rossed cord. The yield, as 
 will be seen, is directly proportional to the bone-dry weight of the 
 wood. The loss in conversion has been found to range between 12 
 and 15 per cent of the original weight of the bone-dry wood. Ap- 
 proximately 6 per cent can be accounted for in the white water and 1 
 per cent in screenings. The manner in which the remaining losses 
 occur has not been determined, but will be studied in future tests. 
 
 The storage capacity for white water in the laboratory was very 
 limited, and this may to some extent account for the low yields. 
 The continuous use of the white water and the use of save-alls would 
 undoubtedly tend to increase the yields and result in saving a great 
 deal of fine pulp. 
 
 The loss in barking jack pine and hemlock, so far as has been 
 determined up to the present time, is practically the same as the loss 
 in the barking of spruce. There are a great many knots in both 
 hemlock and jack pine, and it is possible that this may cause a some- 
 what greater loss in barking these species. However, on account of 
 the small amounts of the various woods used, no reliable data on loss 
 were obtained. 
 
 FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE QUALITY AND PRODUCTION. 
 SPEED AND PRESSURE. 
 
 The effect of speed on the quality of pulp can best be illustrated 
 by the magnified fibers shown in Plates VII and VIII. In grinding 
 these pulps the pressure and surface of the stone were maintained 
 constant, and the speeds were, respectively, 100, 150, and 200 revolu- 
 tions per minute for the hemlock, and 152 and 205 revolutions for 
 the jack pine. There is little difference in the fibers ground under 
 these different conditions of speed; especially those run at 150 and 
 200 revolutions per minute. Speed probably has very little effect 
 on the quality of pulp. With satisfactory pressure and curface of 
 stone, it is possible to obtain good grades of pulp at any speeds within 
 reasonable limits. Commercially, it is practically impossible to main- 
 
16 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 tain the speed constant at all times. When the pressure on a pocket 
 is removed the speed is bound to rise considerably, especially when 
 the water wheels or turbines are operated without a governor. 
 
 When hemlock wood was ground at low speed and low pressure 
 it was impossible to obtain anything more than a powder. Also when 
 this wood was ground at low pressure and high speed the product was 
 extremely short, but the pressures at which these results were obtained 
 are considerably lower than those ordinarily employed commercially, 
 and the results have little significance. If the stone is what is ordi- 
 narily called sharp, it is necessary to use a lower pressure, and when 
 dull, a higher one, but it is impossible to obtain the same quality of 
 pulp under both conditions. Speed and pressure affect quantity 
 rather than quality, and by the proper adjustment of both the maxi- 
 mum efficiency of grinding is attained. If a certain speed is selected 
 there must be a corresponding pressure which will yield the greatest 
 amount of pulp in 24 hours with the least consumption of power. 
 
 By the term " constant pressure/' wherever used in this report, is 
 meant constant pressure on the grinder cylinders. The pressure per 
 square inch of wood in contact with the grinding surface varies con- 
 siderably, chiefly with the size of wood ground and the area of the 
 pocket. Again, the length of the wood is not at all a constant quantity, 
 and this, too, can only result in a variable pressure per square inch of 
 wood. The pressure of the wood on the stone varies throughout 
 certain limits with any pressure on the grinder cylinder, and the 
 ranges of pressure of the wood on the stone are raised or lowered by 
 raising or lowering the cylinder pressure. This pressure variation, 
 however, can hardly be controlled commercially, and therefore has 
 not been considered in the test's discussed in this report. There is 
 also more or less pressure variation due to binding of wood in the 
 pockets, and this, too, is difficult, if not impossible, to control. 
 Figure 1 shows a measure of the power applied to the grinder. The 
 effect of pocket binding and the withdrawal of pressure from one of 
 the pockets will be noted. At one end of this chart the power con- 
 sumed is approximately 360 kilowatts, falling off gradually to 280 
 kilowatts, due to pocket binding. After raising the pistons and read- 
 justing the wood in the different pockets, the power to the grinder 
 motor had to be increased to 350 kilowatts on account of the added 
 load produced by eliminating the pocket binding. 
 
 SURFACE OF STONE. 
 
 The most efficient grinding condition is one where there is a maxi- 
 mum amount of grinding surface, and still a sufficient amount of 
 depression in the stone to allow for the carrying away of the ground 
 wood, or, as this is commonly called, for the clearing of the stone. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE IV. 
 
 FIG. 1. -SPRUCE SULPHITE STANDARD. 
 
 
 '-.^^m^^stm 
 
 FIG. 2. SPRUCE GROUND WOOD, No. 1 STANDARD. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE V. 
 
 . :. \ 
 
 
 
 FIQ. 1. SPRUCE GROUND WOOD, No. 2 STANDARD. 
 
 FIG. 2. SPRUCE GROUND WOOD, No. 3 STANDARD, COARSE GROUND. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE VI. 
 
 FIG. 1. SPRUCE GROUND WOOD, No. 4 STANDARD, MEDIUM GROUND. 
 
 m 
 
 FIG. 2. SPRUCE GROUND WOOD, No.- 5 STANDARD, FINE GROUND. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture- Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE VII. 
 
 FIG. 1.-100 R. P. M. (RUN No. 35.) 
 
 FIG. 2. 150 R. P. M. (RUN No. 36.) 
 
 - *. , - "- 
 
 FlQ. 3.-200 R. P. M. (RUN No. 37.) 
 COMPARISON OF HEMLOCK PULPS GROUND AT DIFFERENT SPEEDS. 
 
Forest Service, U. S Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE VIII. 
 
 fflnBi 3IP4, 
 
 
 ^XM^^mMm 
 
 FIG. 1.-152 R. P. M. (RUN No. 19.) 
 
 FIG. 2. 205 R. P. M. (RUN No. 20-1.) 
 COMPARISON OF JACK PINE PULPS GROUND AT DIFFERENT SPEEDS. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE IX. 
 
 FIG. 1. JACK PINE GROUND WOOD. (RUN No. 14-1.) 
 
 FIG. 2. JACK PINE GROUND WOOD. (RUN No. 13-1.) 
 
Forest Service U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE X. 
 
 mm 
 
 i - I * \r .' ,\> 
 
 FIG. 1. JACK PINE GROUND WOOD. (RUN No. 7-1.) 
 
 FIG. 2. JACK PINE GROUND WOOD. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 24.) 
 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE XI. 
 
 
 FIQ. 1. HEMLOCK GROUND WOOD. (RUN No. 41.) 
 
 
 '-'--'-^^ - , -^., - " '>--*. 'l*- -' 
 
 FIG. 2. HEMLOCK GROUND WOOD. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 14-1.) 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE XII. 
 
 
 .: J^fegj 
 FIG. 1. HEMLOCK GROUND WOOD. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 8.) 
 
 FIG. 2. HEMLOCK GROUND WOOD. (RUN No. 2.) 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE XIII. 
 
 ' 
 
 FIG. 1. HEMLOCK GROUND WOOD. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 30 ) 
 
 
 FIQ. 2. HEMLOCK GROUND WOOD. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 50.) USED IN ACCOMPANYING 
 
 PAPER SAMPLE. 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE XIV. 
 
 
 FIG. 1 .GROUND-WOOD PULP, ONE-THIRD SPRUCE, TWO-THIRDS HEMLOCK. (RUN 
 
 No. 46 A.) 
 
 FIG. 2. GROUND-WOOD PULP, ALL HEMLOCK. (RUN No. 46e.) 
 
 /. "%, 
 
 IMfei^ 
 
 ^^/^ - / 
 
 (^^* ^i ~y- 
 
 
 
 FIG. 3. GROUND-WOOD PULP, ALL SPRUCE. (RUN No. 46c.) 
 
Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Mechanical Pulp. 
 
 PLATE XV. 
 
 
 FIG. 1. ONE-THIRD SPRUCE, TWO-THIRDS HEMLOCK. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 46A.) 
 
 
 *V3 
 
 FIG. 2. ONE-THIRD HEMLOCK, ONE-THIRD JACK PINE, ONE-THIRD SPRUCE. (COMMERCIAL 
 
 RUN No. 51.) 
 
 
 ^Ti&^i? ^A--. '?;* -. .vvt- '^ i-^ .-m .-^JW,-- '** -v 
 
 t :: J '^ V^SI S W:^^' 
 
 s>^^ -<, ; v- .*;-,' :v'..jf3^r/> iV-^k r v >. 
 
 FIG. 3. ONE-THIRD JACK PINE, TWO-THIRDS HEMLOCK. (COMMERCIAL RUN No. 52.) 
 
 MIXED GROUND-WOOD PULPS USED IN ACCOMPANYING PAPER 
 
 SAMPLES. 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 17 
 
 Throughout the experiments, particularly the commercial tests, it 
 was found that the pulp of same appearance as regards fiber and of 
 the same apparent strength can be obtained by using burrs of 
 different design and fineness of cut, provided the grit of the stv, is 
 in each case the same. For example, during the commercial tests 
 the stone was burred at different times with different types of burrs, 
 and the grinding in each case was found to require the consumption 
 of the same amount of power. The production per day was the same 
 also, provided the grit was brought to the same condition of sharpness 
 and the other variables were kept constant. 
 
 During some of the preliminary tests the surface of stone was 
 dulled with a fire brick, as is often done in mills. This appears to 
 have been unnecessary ; in fact, the result is detrimental rather than 
 beneficial. 
 
 Better pulp was obtained and the production was increased slightly 
 by crushing the tops of the ridges formed in burring by means of a 
 solid, smooth bush roll. This method does not smooth off the indi- 
 vidual particles of sand on the stone as duUing with the brick does, 
 but rather sharpens them . During the tests conducted on mixed woods 
 a surface obtained by the use of a three- to- the- inch straight-cut solid 
 burr and a 12-cut spiral burr was used. The stone was first dressed 
 with a three-to-the-inch burr, forming grooves in the stone approxi- 
 mately one thirty-second inch deep; then the portion of the stone 
 between these depressions was roughed with a 12-cut spiral burr. 
 This caused the grit to stand out and gave a maximum of useful 
 grinding surface. The pulp obtained with this surface was almost 
 entirely free from shives, and the fibers were long and fine. The sur- 
 face of stone used during these tests is shown in Plate III, figure 2. 
 
 A great deal of experimentation still remains to be done, not only 
 with burrs of different cut and design, but more especially with stones 
 of different grits, since it appears that the grit is more responsible 
 for the quality of pulp obtained than any other variable feature in its 
 production. 
 
 Where the pulp stone is deep burred, however, the grit is not so 
 important a factor of quality. When the power consumed in making 
 a ton of bone-dry pulp is as low as 50 to 60 horsepower, the added 
 production which must be secured to bring the power to this low 
 value is obtained through the action of the ridges on the stone and 
 not through the grit. When it is desired to manufacture a pulp of 
 high quality, however, it is the grit of the stone and the manner of 
 raising it which must be considered. The type of burr used and the 
 depth of dressing both influence production, but it is only the latter 
 that influences the quality. When the pulp stone has been dressed 
 so as to provide just sufficient depression to carry away the ground 
 23688 12 2 
 
18 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 wood a high-grade pulp will be produced, providing the grit of the 
 
 stone is suitable, irrespective of the style of the burr and within 
 
 ~vable limits of the pressure used. It is not impossible to con- 
 
 jf an artificial stone which could be used continually without 
 
 n, Jig, which would clear itself without having depressions or 
 
 ridges, and which would have the correct size and kind of grit to give 
 
 the maximum production and best quality. 
 
 TEMPERATURE. 
 
 The temperature of grinding, it is said, has much to do with the 
 quality and quantity of pulp obtained, and many manufacturers 
 insist that it is impossible to secure a tough, strong fiber with anything 
 but the hot grinding process. It was noted in the experiments that 
 the rate of production was not nearly as great at a low temperature 
 as it was after a high one was reached. However, it was impossible 
 to detect microscopically any difference in the fibers themselves. As 
 has been said, the only observations made on cold grinding were 
 while the stone was warming up, and on this account it is impossible 
 to say definitely what particular advantages or disadvantages, if any, 
 lie in the hot grinding process. 
 
 UNDETERMINED FACTORS. 
 
 Since the experimental work on hemlock, jack pine, and spruce 
 was started a number of factors which more or less influence the 
 quality and the rate of production of pulp have made themselves 
 evident. These are the rate of growth of the wood, moisture content 
 of the wood, size of wood ground, temperature of grinding, the thick- 
 ness of stock in the grinder pit, and the grit of the pulp stone, the 
 last undoubtedly being the most important. All of these variables 
 will be studied in future experiments, though the grit of the pulp 
 stone is the one which will probably receive the greatest attention. 
 It is doubtful whether this very important item in the production of 
 ground wood has been given sufficient consideration by manufacturers. 
 
 MICROSCOPIC COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL PULPS AND 
 COMMERCIAL STANDARDS. 
 
 STANDARD PULPS. 
 
 Since it was necessary to have some means of comparing the 
 experimental pulps produced with commercial products, portions of 
 the samples obtained from manufacturers were photographed, in an 
 endeavor to classify the fibers according to their quality. It was 
 found that there is a more or less regular grading of the material 
 from long, fine fiber to pulp which is almost a powder. It is probable 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 19 
 
 thai/ each of the various grades of pulp has its particular use in cer- 
 tain qualities of paper, though no attempt has been made to classify 
 them according to uses. The standards selected are shown . ites 
 IV, V, and VI; in each case the fibers are enlarged 15 time For 
 the purpose of comparison the spruce sulphite standard fiber is shown 
 in Plate IV, figure 1, and the No. 1 spruce ground- wood standard in 
 figure 2. It is indeed very seldom that a sample of pulp is obtained 
 which corresponds to the No. 1 spruce ground- wood standard. As 
 will be noted, the fibers are very similar to the sulphite fibers, although 
 there is a certain amount of short material and coarse fiber present 
 which does not occur in the sulphite pulp. 
 
 Plate V shows the No. 2 ground- wood standard and No. 3 coarse 
 ground- wood standard. The No. 2 differs from the No. 1 standard 
 only in the amount of short fiber and coarse fiber present, the No. 2 
 having larger amounts of these two kinds. The coarse standard 
 needs no description. It is a kind of fiber often made by mills during 
 their low-water periods in order to maintain production with less 
 power consumption. 
 
 The No. 4, medium ground-wood standard, and the No. 5, fine 
 ground-wood standard, seem to follow in logical sequence those pre- 
 viously given. The No. 4 standard has the appearance of being a 
 mixture of No. 3 and No. 5. The No. 5, as will be noted, contains an 
 extremely small amount of fiber and is composed largely of dust and 
 short-fiber particles. 
 
 Table 2 gives the data furnished by the manufacturers of the 
 various pulp samples selected as standards. These data, for the 
 most part, are only approximate, but they will serve to give some 
 idea of the conditions under which the material was produced. 
 
 TABLE 2. Conditions of manufacture of spruce ground-wood standards. 
 
 Number of stand- 
 ard. 
 
 Make of grinder. 
 
 1 
 
 Size of cylinders. 
 
 & 
 
 * 
 o 
 
 
 
 i" 3 
 
 35 
 40 
 45 
 60 
 90 
 
 Equivalent pres- 
 sure on 14-inch 
 cylinder. 
 
 Kind of stone. 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 Size of 
 stone. 
 
 Number o 
 ets. 
 
 3 
 ~<v 
 
 5 
 
 54 
 54 
 54 
 54 
 54 
 
 Pm 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 
 Friction Pulley & Machine 
 Works. 
 Carthage Machine Co 
 
 3 
 3 
 3 
 3 
 3 
 
 16 
 16 
 18 
 14 
 10 
 
 45.7 
 52.2 
 74.4 
 60.0 
 45.9 
 
 Lombard 
 
 Washers 
 
 27 
 26 
 27 
 251 
 181 
 
 Lombard and 
 Manufacturers' 
 Lombard 
 
 Empire 
 
 Solid spiral cut 8 
 to 1 inch. 
 Diamond point 
 cut 6 to 1 inch. 
 Straight cut 7 to 1- 
 inch. 
 Diamond point 7 
 to 1-inch and 5 
 to 1-inch. 
 
 Dayton Globe Iron Works 
 Carthage Machine Co 
 
 Friction Pulley & Machine 
 Works. 
 
 Greeley, New 
 Castle. 
 
20 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 TAB^E 2. Conditions of manufacture of spruce ground-wood standards Continued. 
 
 
 
 R 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
 "3 
 
 1 
 
 
 "S-c 
 
 1* 
 
 Make of grinder. 
 
 rotations 
 nute of s 
 
 ii 
 , 
 
 I 1 
 
 sf 
 
 &4&0 
 
 "o 
 
 Grade of paper. 
 
 r-t 
 
 
 & 5 
 
 s 
 
 o 
 
 M 
 
 s 
 
 
 * 
 
 
 P3 
 
 
 
 H; 
 
 g 
 
 s 
 
 
 1 
 
 Friction Pulley & Machine Works 
 
 180 
 
 2,545 
 
 90 
 
 160 
 
 .012 
 
 Do not make paper. 
 
 
 
 f 190 
 
 2,686 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 2 
 
 Carthage Machine Co 
 
 \ to 
 
 to 
 
 \ 75 
 
 175 
 
 .012 
 
 Poster 
 
 
 
 1 200 
 
 2,827 
 
 ! 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 Dayton Globe Iron Works 
 
 145 
 
 2,050 
 
 i 300 
 
 
 .010 
 
 News 
 
 4 
 
 Carthage Machine Co 
 
 270 
 
 3 817 
 
 100 
 
 
 075 
 
 Do 
 
 5 
 
 Friction Pulley & Machine Works 
 
 220 
 
 3,110 
 
 70 
 
 Cold. 
 
 .011 
 
 Specialties. Some 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 coated, requiring 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a soft and fine 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 pulp. 
 
 1 To grinder. 
 
 JACK PINE PULP. 
 
 Plates VIII, IX, and X show six samples of ground-wood fiber 
 obtained from jack pine. The data taken during these tests are given 
 in Table 4. There is a very striking likeness between the fiber 
 obtained from jack pine and that from spruce. Especially is this 
 true of the fiber secured by using the natural grit of the pulp stone 
 without any burring. Tests Nos. 7-1, 19, and 13-1 were run by 
 using an excessive amount of power and by sacrificing the rate of 
 production. This wood was ground, however, in the dry state, and 
 unquestionably the same quality of fiber could be obtained with 
 increased production and lower horsepower consumption per ton if 
 it was soaked or steamed. The fibers obtained in tests Nos. 20-1, 
 commercial run No. 14-1, and commercial run No. 24 compare favor- 
 ably with the No. 4 standard, and the production and power con- 
 sumption are more nearly those obtained commercially. There is 
 more short material than is found in the No. 1 or No. 2 standards, but 
 still the fiber is long and fine, and appears to have considerable 
 strength. The illustrations show some of the better fibers obtained. 
 Of course pulp has been made in the laboratory which was fully as 
 fine as that shown as the No. 5 standard. Some has been made also 
 which is fully as coarse as the No. 3. However, this is rather the 
 exception than the rule. 
 
 The jack pine fiber shown in Plate X (run No. 7-1) was the most 
 pleasing in appearance when in the pulp lap, and was generally con- 
 sidered to possess the best quality. The rate of production, however, 
 was so very low, and the horsepower consumption so high, that it has 
 no commercial importance. 
 
JACK PINE, AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 21 
 
 HEMLOCK PULP. 
 
 Plates XI, XII, and XIII show hemlock fibers which were o v ' i ,d 
 during the tests. Undoubtedly the most notable feature is * ge 
 
 amount of fine material present as compared with the jack pin- .cim- 
 ples. Hemlock grinds short and fine to a far greater extent than 
 either spruce or jack pine. While there are a great many long fibers 
 present, they are not sufficient in number to give a strong and tough 
 pulp. A certain amount of short material is necessary, however, for 
 news paper, and it is this material which gives a good finish. The 
 finish on the paper made from the hemlock pulp, commercial run No. 
 8, was exceedingly good; in fact, the superintendent of the mill where 
 the sample was run pronounced it better than the standard news. It 
 will be seen that there is a regular gradation in the length of fibers 
 from the long to the almost powder form. On certain of the illustra- 
 tions of hemlock fiber black spots composed of a great deal of fine 
 fiber will be noticed. These are the result of drying the pulp before 
 making slides, it being impossible entirely to beat out the fiber after 
 drying. When the material was in the form of pulp laps there was 
 no marked difference in the pulps. However, as with the jack-pine 
 samples, only the better grades of pulp obtained are shown. The 
 sample of pulp illustrated in Plate XIII, figure 2 (commercial run No. 
 50), is fairly representative of the pulp which it is possible to make 
 from hemlock under the conditions described. 
 
 MIXED PULPS. 
 
 Plate XIV shows three photomicrographs of fibers obtained under 
 exactly the same conditions of pressure, speed, and surface of stone. 
 The temperature and other minor variables were also kept as nearly 
 alike as possible. 
 
 Figure 1 shows fibers obtained by grinding hemlock in two of the 
 grinder pockets and spruce in the third (run 46a) . Upon determina- 
 tion it was found that the pulp contained 34 per cent spruce and 66 
 per cent hemlock. Figure 2 shows hemlock fiber obtained under the 
 same conditions (run 46&) as the first test, and figure 3 shows a number 
 of spruce fibers (run No. 46c). The hemlock fiber is considerably 
 shorter than the spruce and there are more shives present. In the 
 composite sample the hemlock is decidedly in evidence. 
 
 Plate XV shows three fibers obtained by grinding different woods 
 in different pockets of the pulp grinder. Commercial run No. 46a is 
 composed of a mixture one-third spruce and two-thirds hemlock; 
 commercial run No. 51 is composed of one- third jack pine, one-third 
 spruce, and one-third hemlock; commercial run No. 52 of one-third 
 jack pine and two-thirds hemlock. All of these pulps when in the 
 
22 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 lap appeared to be a very good quality; in fact, it will be seen that the 
 fiber of which they are composed is of good length and that there is 
 no as much short material present as there is in the samples 
 
 of pulp. 
 
 Coi aorcially it would be possible to obtain better mixed pulps by 
 grinding the different woods in separate grinders and preparing the 
 stones so as to obtain the best quality of pulp from each wood. 
 
 It has been found, by comparing the samples submitted by Amer- 
 ican manufacturers with the standards chosen, that 5 per cent can 
 be classed as No. 1 pulp, 12 per cent as No. 2 pulp, 12 per cent as No. 
 3 pulp, 61 per cent as No. 4, and 10 per cent as No. 5. Comparison 
 of the experimental pulps with the commercial standards shows that 
 mixed pulps particularly compare well with the No. 4 standard, for 
 which there is evidently the greatest demand. 
 
 SAMPLES OF PAPER, PRODUCED. 
 
 In order to determine the adaptability of the pulps obtained in the 
 experiments to the manufacture of paper, a number of test paper runs 
 were made with the pulps which gave greatest promise. Samples of 
 the paper obtained accompany this report. All of the sheets of news 
 paper were made on a machine in the Port Edwards mill of the 
 Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. This machine is 116 inches wide, and 
 the sheet produced, trimmed, was 109 inches. The machine was 
 operated at a speed of 465 feet per minute, and no changes were made 
 in weight of sheet or speed after the beginning of the test; in fact, 
 throughout the runs the conditions were maintained as nearly con- 
 stant as possible. The finish on the paper was obtained by passing 
 the sheet nine times through a 12-roll calender stack. In each case 
 three 1,500-pound beaters of stock were run into sheet in order to 
 have the test continuous over sufficient time to give an idea of its 
 operation on the paper machine. It was intended to by-pass the 
 Jordan engine, but this being impossible, the stock was passed 
 through the engine and the roll set up only slightly. 
 
 Running changes were made in each test, and no difference was 
 found with any of the sheets excepting jack pine. This material 
 was somewhat pitchy, and after an hour's run it was necessary to 
 remove the dandy, since it began to pick up stock. All of the papers 
 were free on the wire and caused no trouble whatever. 
 
 The samples of paper containing spruce were made up for the pur- 
 pose of comparison. It will be seen that, with the exception of color, 
 the sheets differ little, and it is reasonable to suppose that the color 
 could be improved. Allowance should be made for the appearance 
 of the sheets as regards brown shives, these being due to the hem- 
 lock sulphite used, and not to the ground wood. Data on the beater 
 ''furnish" for the various papers are given in Table 10. Table 3 
 gives a comparison of strength of the various sheets. 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 The samples of butcher's manila and No. 2 white manila given were 
 made by the Nekoosa-Ed wards Paper Co., the furnish being sho^ :T I 
 Table 10. These samples are meant merely to give an idea of 
 can be obtained when mixtures of hemlock and spruce are usea. 
 
 The strength of all of the sheets, with the exception of the one made 
 up of hemlock sulphite and jack-pine ground wood, compares well with 
 standard news paper. The paper from run No. 24 has another decid- 
 edly objectionable feature, and that is the loss of finish occasioned by 
 rubbing the sheet with the hand. The fibers under this treatment 
 fuzz up, and considerable powder and short fiber fall off. Several of 
 the other sheets have this same peculiarity, but if more size were 
 added this trouble would probably be eliminated. 
 
 The experimental papers have not yet been tested on high-speed 
 presses, and this must be done before accurate knowledge of the value 
 of the several sheets can be had. 
 
 However, after having obtained news paper of the quality of the 
 attached samples from hemlock, jack pine, and mixtures of these 
 woods without changing in any way present commercial practice, it 
 seems beyond doubt that these woods may be advantageously used 
 either singly or in various combinations, at least in the cheaper grades 
 of paper. 
 
 TABLE 3. Strength, weight, and thickness tests on experimental papers. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 Mullen test. 
 
 Schopper test. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ,d 
 
 
 
 
 ' d 
 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 || 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 Lengthwise. 
 
 Crosswise. 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 Q 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 o o 
 
 
 ,rj 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 fS 
 
 T3 
 
 ^ 
 
 g .s 
 
 OT 
 
 a 
 
 Is 
 
 
 
 d >> 
 
 i 
 
 
 d s>> 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 mlock sulpr 
 
 uce ground 
 
 ^S 
 1 
 I 
 
 
 
 0. 
 
 ight per rea 
 24 by 36 
 
 erage thicki 
 
 p 
 
 fl 
 
 o 
 
 1 
 
 "& 
 
 erage stretc] 
 
 erage load o 
 trip 18 b 
 .65 cm. 
 
 !! 
 
 <3 d 
 
 erage stretc 
 
 erage load o 
 trips 18 b 
 .65 cm. 
 
 p 
 
 03 fcjQ 
 
 g 
 
 o> 
 
 
 <D 
 
 
 
 
 ^> 
 
 r3 
 
 B 
 
 > 
 
 > Wl-< 
 
 >-~ 
 
 !> 
 
 > WH 
 
 * ' r-l 
 
 O 
 
 w 
 
 00 
 
 w 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 5 
 
 M 
 
 CQ 
 
 <J 
 
 <5 
 
 <t 
 
 < 
 
 A 
 
 <1 
 
 
 P.ct. 
 
 P. c/i. 
 
 P. c. 
 
 P.ct. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Inches. 
 
 i6s. 
 
 
 P.ct. 
 
 Kilos. 
 
 Meters. 
 
 P.ct. 
 
 Kilos. 
 
 Met's. 
 
 1(T 
 
 5 
 
 95 
 
 
 
 32 
 
 0. 0033 
 
 11 
 
 0.344 
 
 0.8 
 
 2.95 
 
 3,687 
 
 1.4 
 
 1.765 
 
 2,254 
 
 1 
 
 25 
 
 75 
 
 
 
 33 
 
 .0035 
 
 13.2 
 
 .400 
 
 .95 
 
 3.49 
 
 4,043 
 
 1.22 
 
 .780 
 
 2,150 
 
 94 
 
 25 
 
 
 
 75 
 
 33 
 
 .0038 
 
 8.2 
 
 .249 
 
 .95 
 
 2.53 
 
 3,251 
 
 1.08 
 
 .305 
 
 690 
 
 46 
 
 25 
 
 25 
 
 50 
 
 
 33 
 
 .0037 
 
 11.4 
 
 .345 
 
 1.05 
 
 3.495 
 
 3,907 
 
 1.42 
 
 .755 
 
 ,987 
 
 50 
 
 25 
 
 
 75 
 
 
 34 
 
 .0035 
 
 10.2 
 
 .300 
 
 1.11 
 
 3 615 
 
 4 111 
 
 1 17 
 
 555 
 
 819 
 
 51 
 
 25 
 
 25 
 
 25 
 
 25 
 
 32 
 
 .0035 
 
 9.7 
 
 .303 
 
 .95 
 
 2.855 
 
 3,495 
 
 1.24 
 
 .410 
 
 ,692 
 
 52 
 
 25 
 
 
 50 
 
 25 
 
 33 
 
 .004 
 
 9.9 
 
 .300 
 
 .98 
 
 3.005 
 
 3,606 
 
 1.43 
 
 .330 
 
 ,640 
 
 All of the above are averages of 10 determinations. 
 
 SUMMARY OF DATA. 
 
 Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 show compilations of the data secured 
 during tests on hemlock, jack pine, and mixtures of these two woods 
 with spruce. The results of tests under many different conditions of 
 speed, pressure, and surface of stone are given. In a number of cases 
 the data on production and power consumption do not agree with that 
 taken at another time and under the same conditions of pressure, 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOE MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 speed, and type of burr. In all of these instances the differing values 
 onii N> accounted for by the fact that although the same kind of burr 
 
 )d, the stones were of different sharpness. 
 
 s been found difficult to duplicate in one test the surface of 
 si^ , used in another under the same conditions and obtain the same 
 production with the same power consumption. In fact, the pro- 
 duction factors vary greatly over short periods as a result of the vary- 
 ing attention given by the grinder man. On this account the power 
 and production data in the tables can be applied to commercial plants 
 only approximately. If a grinder is operating under the conditions 
 of any of the commercial tests shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7, however, 
 the data given will closely approximate the actual working conditions. 
 
 TABLE 4. Qualitative and quantitative tests on jack pine Power consumption and 
 
 production. 
 
 Kind of 
 stone. 
 
 Run number. 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 Pressure on 14-inch 
 cylinder. 
 
 Pressure per square 
 inch, pocket area. 
 
 Revolutions per 
 minute. 
 
 Peripheral speed 
 per minute. 
 
 Average horsepower 
 to grinder. 
 
 Bone-dry pulp in 24 
 hours. 
 
 Horse power per ton 
 bone-dry pulp in 
 24 hours. 
 
 Bone-dry pulp per 
 100 cubic feet borie- 
 dry wood. 
 
 Weight per cubic 
 foot bone-dry 
 wood. 
 
 Average tem pera- 
 ture'bf grinding. 
 
 Size of screen slots. 
 
 Manufac- 
 turers'. 
 Do 
 
 1 
 2 
 
 Natural sur- 
 face, 
 do 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 20.0 
 
 30.0 
 
 Lbs. 
 8.20 
 
 12.30 
 
 151. 
 151.0 
 
 Feet. 
 2,100 
 
 2,100 
 
 
 Tons. 
 
 
 Lbs 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 JK 
 140.0 
 
 147.0 
 
 Inch. 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 3 
 
 do 
 
 39 
 
 10.00 
 
 150 
 
 2,090 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 176. 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 3-1 
 
 do .. 
 
 39.3 
 
 16. 10 
 
 151.0 
 
 2,100 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 176.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 4 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 150.6 
 
 2,100 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 196. 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 5 
 
 do ... 
 
 60.0 
 
 24.65 
 
 151.0 
 
 2, 100 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 199. 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 6 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 
 24. 65 
 
 171.0 
 
 2,380 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 196.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 6-1 
 
 do 
 
 60.0 
 
 24.65 
 
 171.0 
 
 2,370 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 201.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 7 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 171.0 
 
 2,370 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 199.0 
 
 C 1 ) 
 
 Do 
 
 7-1 
 
 do 
 
 50.0 
 
 20.50 
 
 172.0 
 
 2.380 
 
 256.0 
 
 1.305 
 
 196.2 
 
 1,820 
 
 25.27 
 
 197.0 
 
 0. 012 
 
 Do 
 
 7-2 
 
 do 
 
 50.0 
 
 20.50 
 
 172 
 
 2,380 
 
 245 
 
 1.263 
 
 193. 6 
 
 2, 150 
 
 25. 57 
 
 183.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 8 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 
 24 65 
 
 203 
 
 2,810 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 198.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 8-1 
 
 do 
 
 60.0 
 
 24. 65 
 
 203. 
 
 2,810 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 191.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 9 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 50 
 
 202 
 
 2,800 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 205.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 10 
 
 do.... 
 
 75.0 
 
 30.80 
 
 202.0 
 
 2,800 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 185.0 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 Do 
 
 11 
 11-1 
 
 Diamond 
 point, 6 to 
 the inch, 
 do 
 
 60.0 
 60.0 
 
 24. 65 
 24. 65 
 
 152. 5 
 154.0 
 
 2,100 
 2,100 
 
 380.5 
 360. 5 
 
 6.075 
 
 59.3 
 
 
 
 148.0 
 146.0 
 
 .012 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20 50 
 
 152 5 
 
 2 100 
 
 350 
 
 5 225 
 
 67 
 
 
 
 145.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 12-1 
 
 do!!! '!!.... 
 
 50.0 
 
 20.50 
 
 154.0 
 
 2,100 
 
 359.0 
 
 7.030 
 
 51.0 
 
 
 
 179.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 13 
 
 do. . 
 
 40.0 
 
 16.40 
 
 152.5 
 
 2,100 
 
 260. 
 
 3.028 
 
 85.9 
 
 
 
 138. 2 
 
 .012 
 
 Do. .. 
 Do 
 
 13-1 
 14 
 
 do 
 do 
 
 40.0 
 50.0 
 
 16. 40 
 20.50 
 
 153. 5 
 173.0 
 
 2,100 
 2,380 
 
 299.0 
 324.0 
 
 2. 670 
 4.7K 
 
 112.0 
 
 68.8 
 
 
 
 195.0 
 154.0 
 
 .012 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14-1 
 
 do 
 
 50.0 
 
 20. .50 
 
 174.0 
 
 2,380 
 
 398.0 
 
 5. 046 
 
 78.8 
 
 
 
 166.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 15 
 
 do 
 
 60.0 
 
 24.65 
 
 173. 
 
 2,380 
 
 395. 5 
 
 6.290 
 
 61.8 
 
 
 
 138. 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 15-1 
 
 do. . 
 
 60.0 
 
 24. 65 
 
 174.0 
 
 2,380 
 
 461.0 
 
 5.500 
 
 83.8 
 
 
 
 158.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do. .. 
 Do. .. 
 Do 
 
 16 
 16-1 
 17 
 
 do 
 do 
 
 do 
 
 40.0 
 40. ( 
 40.0 
 
 16.40 
 16. 40 
 16. 40 
 
 203. 5 
 205. 
 173.0 
 
 2,800 
 2.800 
 2.380 
 
 362. 5 
 375.0 
 289. 
 
 5.450 
 5. 360 
 3.834 
 
 66.4 
 70.0 
 75.5 
 
 
 
 147.0 
 200.0 
 143. 
 
 .012 
 
 .012 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 17-1 
 
 . do 
 
 40.0 
 
 16.40 
 
 174.0 
 
 2,380 
 
 332.0 
 
 4. 350 
 
 76.3 
 
 
 
 178.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 18 
 
 do . 
 
 50.0 
 
 20. -50 
 
 204.0 
 
 2,800 
 
 407.5 
 
 6.910 
 
 59.0 
 
 
 
 143.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 18-1 
 
 ...do.... 
 
 50.0 
 
 20.50 
 
 205.0 
 
 2,800 
 
 414.0 
 
 6.360 
 
 65.0 
 
 
 
 193 t O 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 19 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12 30 
 
 15 5 
 
 2 100 
 
 201 
 
 2.045 
 
 98 3 
 
 
 
 149.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 20 
 
 do 
 
 30.0 
 
 12.30 
 
 205.0 
 
 2,800 
 
 313.0 
 
 5 320 
 
 58.8 
 
 
 
 178.0 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 Do. 
 
 20-1 
 21 
 
 do 
 
 do.... 
 
 30.0 
 30.0 
 
 12.30 
 12.30 
 
 205. 
 174.0 
 
 2,800 
 2,380 
 
 304.0 
 269. 5 
 
 3.620 
 4.810 
 
 83.8 
 56.0 
 
 2,370 
 
 24.90 
 
 198.0 
 172.0 
 
 .012 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 22 
 
 do 
 
 60.0 
 
 21. 64 
 
 205. 
 
 2,800 
 
 481.0 
 
 7.320 
 
 65.8 
 
 
 
 1S5. 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 Lombard 
 
 23 
 
 24 
 
 do 
 
 40.0 
 { 40.1 
 
 16. 40 
 16.40 
 
 205.0 
 J175. 
 
 2,800 
 2,445 
 
 249.0 
 395. 
 
 4.110 
 4.305 
 
 84.9 
 91.8 
 
 2,220 
 
 25.60 
 
 206. 
 176.3 
 
 .012 
 .012 
 
 
 
 
 \ 45. 
 
 18. 46 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 Unscreened. 
 
JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 25 
 
 TABLE 5. Qualitative and quantitative tests on hemlock Power consumption and 
 
 production. 
 
 Kind of 
 stone. 
 
 m number. 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 essure on 14-inch 
 cylinder. 
 
 essure per square 
 ich, pocket area. 
 
 evolutions per 
 minute. 
 
 ripheral speed 
 per minute. 
 
 ^erage horsepower 
 to grinder. 
 
 >ne-dry pulp in 24 
 hours. 
 
 C fl 
 
 !* 
 a= 
 
 E 
 
 111 
 
 o 
 
 M 
 
 P 
 | d 
 
 t 
 
 m 
 
 1! 
 *! 
 
 HI 
 
 to 
 &o 
 
 
 
 0> p 
 
 v 
 jo 
 
 C 
 
 1 
 g 
 
 o 
 
 o> 
 
 
 tf 
 
 
 Pi 
 
 
 (2 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 PQ 
 
 W 
 
 
 
 
 <J 
 
 CQ 
 
 
 
 
 Straight cut, 
 
 Lbs. 
 50 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 20.50 
 
 170.0 
 
 Feet. 
 2,380 
 
 288.0 
 
 Tons. 
 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 F. 
 131. 
 
 Inch. 
 
 (i) 
 
 turers'. 
 Do 
 
 1 
 
 10 to the 
 inch, 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12.30 
 
 100.0 
 
 1,400 
 
 1.54.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 126.0 
 
 C 1 ) 
 
 "Do 
 
 2 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12 30 
 
 150 
 
 2 100 
 
 202 
 
 
 
 
 
 143.0 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 
 Do 
 
 3 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12.30 
 
 200.0 
 
 2,800 
 
 275. 
 
 
 
 
 
 150.0 
 
 2 ) 
 
 Do 
 
 4 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12 30 
 
 25 
 
 3 150 
 
 301 
 
 
 
 
 
 155.0 
 
 M 
 
 Do 
 
 5 
 
 do 
 
 20 
 
 8.20 
 
 150.0 
 
 2,100 
 
 169. 5 
 
 1.011 
 
 167.7 
 
 
 
 159.0 
 
 2 ) 
 
 Do 
 
 6 
 
 do 
 
 20 
 
 8 20 
 
 175 
 
 2 450 
 
 210 
 
 1 380 
 
 152 
 
 
 
 170 C 
 
 2) 
 
 Do 
 
 7 
 
 do 
 
 20 
 
 8.20 
 
 225.0 
 
 3,150 
 
 223.0 
 
 1.295 
 
 172. 
 
 
 
 169.0 
 
 2) 
 
 Do 
 
 2-1 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12.30 
 
 150.0 
 
 2,100 
 
 254.0 
 
 1.965 
 
 129.0 
 
 
 
 167. C 
 
 2) 
 
 Do 
 
 g 
 
 do 
 
 40 
 
 16.40 
 
 175.0 
 
 2,450 
 
 328.0 
 
 3.055 
 
 107.3 
 
 
 
 166.0 
 
 2) 
 
 Do 
 
 9 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 
 21 65 
 
 175 
 
 2 450 
 
 430 
 
 4 730 
 
 91 
 
 
 
 168 
 
 2) 
 
 Do 
 
 10 
 
 Spiral cut, 10 
 
 20 
 
 8.20 
 
 100.0 
 
 1 393 
 
 87.3 
 
 
 
 
 
 129,0 
 
 (1) 
 
 Do 
 
 11 
 
 to the inch, 
 do 
 
 40 
 
 16.40 
 
 175. 
 
 2.440 
 
 259.0 
 
 1.430 
 
 181.0 
 
 
 
 170.0 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 
 Do 
 
 12 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 50 
 
 225. 
 
 3,150 
 
 368. 
 
 2.475 
 
 149. 
 
 
 
 178. 
 
 (*) 
 
 Do 
 
 13 
 
 do . 
 
 60 
 
 24.65 
 
 225. 
 
 3.150 
 
 475 
 
 3. 595 
 
 132.0 
 
 
 
 171.0 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20 50 
 
 175 
 
 2 440 
 
 358 
 
 3 395 
 
 105 6 
 
 
 
 166. 
 
 H 
 
 Do 
 
 15 
 
 do .. 
 
 60 
 
 24.65 
 
 175.0 
 
 2,440 
 
 397.0 
 
 4.044 
 
 98.4 
 
 
 
 131.5 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 16 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12 30 
 
 175 
 
 2 44( 
 
 243 
 
 
 
 
 
 148. 5 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 
 do . 
 
 30 
 
 12.30 
 
 200. 
 
 2,790 
 
 297.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 146.0 
 
 M 
 
 Do 
 
 18 
 
 do 
 
 30 
 
 12 30 
 
 100 
 
 1 390 
 
 162 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 158.0 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 19 
 
 do .. 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 100 
 
 1,390 
 
 261. 
 
 2. 470 
 
 105. 7 
 
 
 
 157. 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 20 
 
 do 
 
 40 
 
 16 40 
 
 200 
 
 2 790 
 
 377 
 
 3 780 
 
 99 7 
 
 
 
 !> 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 21 
 
 do .. 
 
 (50 
 
 24.65 
 
 100.6 
 
 1,100 
 
 281.0 
 
 2. 810 
 
 100.0 
 
 
 
 160.0 
 
 2 
 
 Do 
 
 22 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20 50 
 
 150 
 
 ? 090 
 
 366 
 
 3 815 
 
 96 
 
 
 
 161 5 
 
 w 
 
 Do 
 
 23 
 
 D i a m o n d- 
 
 40 
 
 16.40 
 
 175.0 
 
 2,440 
 
 347.0 
 
 3. 360 
 
 103.2 
 
 
 
 159.0 
 
 M 
 
 Do 
 
 24 
 
 pointcut, 10 
 to the inch, 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20 50 
 
 175 
 
 2,440 
 
 394.0 
 
 5.065 
 
 77 7 
 
 
 
 157. 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 
 Do.... 
 Do 
 
 25 
 26 
 
 do 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 30 
 
 24. 65 
 12 30 
 
 100.0 
 200 
 
 1,390 
 
 2,782 
 
 291.5 
 315.0 
 
 3.312 
 2 945 
 
 88.0 
 107 
 
 
 
 156.0 
 163.0 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 27 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 2J. 50 
 
 200.0 
 
 2,782 
 
 432.0 
 
 5.400 
 
 80.0 
 
 
 
 160.5 
 
 M 
 
 Do 
 
 28 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 
 24. 65 
 
 101 
 
 1,408 
 
 290.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 168.0 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 Do 
 
 29 
 30 
 
 do 
 
 Straight cut: 
 4 to the inch. 
 
 50 
 
 1 40 
 
 20.50 
 16. 40 
 
 175. 
 175.0 
 
 2,435 
 2,435 
 
 372.0 
 319.0 
 
 3.900 
 
 81.8 
 
 
 
 187.0 
 145. 
 
 0) 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 31 
 
 10 to the inch 
 do 
 
 f 
 
 60 
 
 24 65 
 
 100 
 
 1 390 
 
 269 
 
 3 330 
 
 80 9 
 
 
 
 145 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 Do 
 
 3? 
 33 
 
 do 
 
 do 
 
 6( 
 50 
 
 24. 65 
 20 50 
 
 100 
 175 
 
 1,390 
 2, 435 
 
 298.0 
 376 
 
 3. 120 
 4 000 
 
 95.5 
 94 
 
 
 
 155.0 
 163.0 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 ( 2 )' 
 
 Do 
 
 Do 
 
 34 
 35 
 
 Spiral cut, 8 to 
 the inch, 
 do 
 
 60 
 60 
 
 24.65 
 24 65 
 
 100.0 
 100 
 
 1,390 
 1 390 
 
 297.0 
 284 
 
 4.35C 
 2 915 
 
 68.3 
 97 5 
 
 
 
 135.0 
 147 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 (2) 
 
 Do.. .. 
 
 36 
 
 do . 
 
 60 
 
 24.65 
 
 150.0 
 
 2,090 
 
 417.0 
 
 5. 130 
 
 81.4 
 
 
 
 152. 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 37 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 
 24 65 
 
 200 
 
 2 782 
 
 50 
 
 6 890 
 
 75 5 
 
 
 
 154 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 38 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 84.3 
 
 1,173 
 
 212.0 
 
 2.660 
 
 79.7 
 
 
 
 154.0 
 
 M 
 
 Do 
 
 39 
 
 do 
 
 60 
 
 24 65 
 
 85 
 
 1 183 
 
 271 
 
 2 955 
 
 91 8 
 
 
 
 150 
 
 M 
 
 Do 
 
 40 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 100.0 
 
 1,390 
 
 285. 
 
 3 0?5 
 
 94 3 
 
 
 
 156.0 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 
 Do 
 
 41 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20 50 
 
 150 
 
 2 090 
 
 379 
 
 4 450 
 
 85 2 
 
 
 
 155 
 
 () 
 
 Do 
 
 42 
 
 do.. 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 175. 
 
 2,435 
 
 429.0 
 
 5.295 
 
 81.1 
 
 
 
 155.0 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 43 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 90 50 
 
 200 
 
 2 782 
 
 439 
 
 5 4^5 
 
 80 9 
 
 
 
 145 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 Lombard . . 
 
 Do.... 
 
 44 
 45 
 
 47 
 
 do 
 
 Straight cat, 
 3 to the inch, 
 do 
 
 40 
 40 
 
 55 
 
 16. -10 
 16.40 
 
 22.60 
 
 175.0 
 200.0 
 
 200 
 
 2, 435 
 2..800 
 
 2,800 
 
 359.0 
 340.0 
 
 516.0 
 
 4.225 
 2. 91f 
 
 5.370 
 
 85.0 
 116.5 
 
 96.2 
 
 
 
 158.0 
 159.0 
 
 161.0 
 
 H 
 
 (2) 
 
 Do 
 
 48 
 
 . . .do 
 
 50 
 
 20.50 
 
 225.0 
 
 3,145 
 
 510. 
 
 6.235 
 
 81.8 
 
 
 
 164.0 
 
 
 
 Do...... 
 
 50 
 
 Straight cut, 3 
 to the inch; 
 spiral cut, 12 
 to the inch. 
 
 50 
 
 20. 50 
 
 175.0 
 
 2,445 
 
 422.5 
 
 5.300 
 
 79.7 
 
 2.070 
 
 24.84 
 
 170.6 
 
 ( 2 ) 
 
 1 Unscreened. 
 
 2 Size of screen slots, 0.065 and 0.012. 
 
26 
 
 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 TABLE 6. Commercial tests on jack pine Power consumption and production. 
 
 GREEN MATERIAL. 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 
 S, 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 i 
 
 <N 
 
 a fl 
 3- 1 
 
 ^ 
 
 J 
 
 ^ 
 
 Si 
 
 2 
 
 Kind ol 
 stone. 
 
 mercia 
 numL 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 4 . 
 
 ^% 
 
 CTS 
 
 o a 
 
 If 
 
 s 2 
 S 1 * 
 
 tH <U 
 
 1* 
 
 ff>f$ 
 
 olutions 
 minute. 
 
 pheral sp 
 per minute. 
 
 rage horsepo^ 
 to grinder. 
 
 e-dry pulp ir 
 hours. 
 
 sepower per 
 ne-dry pulp 
 hours. 
 
 o! 
 
 S i 
 
 "S 
 
 &.g 
 S'S 
 
 v, C 
 
 I 
 
 &o 
 
 f,r 
 
 t, 
 
 &! 
 
 3 2 ^ 
 
 '.Q > 
 
 % 
 "3 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 <8 
 
 
 
 
 G 
 
 
 > 
 
 g 
 
 0^^ 
 
 - 
 
 S 
 
 S 3 
 & 
 
 H O'D 
 
 I 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 fi 
 
 P4" 1 
 
 X 
 
 P-i 
 
 4 
 
 m 
 
 w 
 
 m 
 
 
 4 
 
 CO 
 
 CO 
 
 
 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 
 Feet. 
 
 
 Tons. 
 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 op 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Incli. 
 
 Manufac- 
 
 14 
 
 D i a m o n d- 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 169 
 
 2,380 
 
 435 
 
 5.380 
 
 80.9 
 
 2,200 
 
 24.9 
 
 153 
 
 
 (i) 
 
 turers'. 
 
 
 point cut, 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 .. do.... 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 458 
 
 G. 650 
 
 68.9 
 
 2 070 
 
 24.9 
 
 150 
 
 
 (i) 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 430 
 
 6. 850 
 
 62.7 
 
 2, 130 
 
 24. 9 
 
 145 
 
 
 H 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 .. do... 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 416 
 
 7.040 
 
 69. 1 
 
 
 24.9 
 
 149 
 
 
 m 
 
 Do... 
 
 14 
 
 do. .. 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 430 
 
 6. 610 
 
 65. 
 
 
 24.9 
 
 149 
 
 
 
 Do.... 
 
 14 
 
 .. do.... 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 4 ''7 
 
 7. 070 
 
 60.4 
 
 2,190 
 
 25.8 
 
 150 
 
 
 ( c) 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 447 
 
 7. 550 
 
 59.2 
 
 
 25. 8 
 
 150 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 .. do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 df\C 
 
 8.300 
 
 55.3 
 
 
 25.8 
 
 147 
 
 
 n 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 441 
 
 7.700 
 
 57.3 
 
 2,190 
 
 25.1 
 
 147 
 
 
 i 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 .. do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 jor 
 
 7.420 
 
 58.0 
 
 2,075 
 
 25. 1 
 
 151 
 
 
 i) 
 
 Do 
 
 11 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20 
 
 171 
 
 2 400 
 
 4^1 
 
 4 960 
 
 85 
 
 2 025 
 
 25 1 
 
 154 
 
 
 ll 
 
 Do. . . 
 
 14 
 
 .. do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 
 6.035 
 
 76.0 
 
 2,180 
 
 25. 1 
 
 162 
 
 
 i) 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 
 50 
 
 20 
 
 1 7 1 
 
 2 400 
 
 446 
 
 6 635 
 
 67 3 
 
 2 200 
 
 25 1 
 
 150 
 
 
 
 Do... . 
 
 14 
 
 . do.... 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 
 2,400 
 
 445 
 
 7. 135 
 
 62 5 
 
 2, 190 
 
 25.1 
 
 147 
 
 
 t < 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do .. 
 
 50 
 
 20 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 462 
 
 7 440 
 
 62 2 
 
 2 160 
 
 25 4 
 
 143 
 
 
 j\ 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 .. do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 
 6,860 
 
 66.0 
 
 2,153 
 
 25.4 
 
 14S 
 
 
 (1) 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do. 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 484 
 
 7 560 
 
 64 
 
 2,155 
 
 25 4 
 
 142 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20. 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 467 
 
 7.335 
 
 63.7 
 
 2,235 
 
 25.4 
 
 137 
 
 
 0) 
 
 
 
 Weighted av- 
 
 
 
 
 
 436 
 
 7.030 
 
 
 2.170 
 
 
 148 
 
 
 
 
 
 erages. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Size of screen slots, 0.065 and 0.012. 
 SEASONED MATERIAL. 
 
 Manufac- 
 
 14 
 
 Diamond 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 457 
 
 5.140 
 
 89.0 
 
 2,125 
 
 25.4 
 
 147 
 
 
 /0.065 
 1 019 
 
 turers'. 
 
 
 point, cut 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 . Ul^S 
 
 
 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 451 
 
 5.570 
 
 81.0 
 
 2,170 
 
 25.6 
 
 142 
 
 
 ' . 065 
 i .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 468 
 
 6.780 
 
 69.0 
 
 2,210 
 
 25.6 
 
 140 
 
 
 
 / .065 
 i .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 455 
 
 7.050 
 
 64.5 
 
 2,260 
 
 25.6 
 
 136 
 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do . 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 460 
 
 7. 365 
 
 62.4 
 
 2,233 
 
 25.6 
 
 142 
 
 
 .065 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do.... 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 490 
 
 6.160 
 
 79.5 
 
 2,150 
 
 25.6 
 
 154 
 
 
 .065 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 . do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 3S6 
 
 3.995 
 
 96.6 
 
 2,095 
 
 25.6 
 
 152 
 
 
 . 065 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 421 
 
 6.240 
 
 67.6 
 
 2,225 
 
 25.6 
 
 144 
 
 
 .065 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 444 
 
 6.340 
 
 70.0 
 
 2,320 
 
 25.6 
 
 152 
 
 
 .065 
 .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 171 
 
 2,400 
 
 417 
 
 5,990 
 
 69.7 
 
 
 25.6 
 
 146 
 
 
 .065 
 \ .012 
 
 
 
 Weighted' av- 
 
 
 
 
 
 447 
 
 6. 2SO 
 
 72.7 
 
 2,210 
 
 
 145 
 
 
 
 
 
 erages. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 SEASONED MATERIAL. 
 
 Lombard . 
 
 24 
 
 Straight cut, 3 
 to the inch; 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 
 385 
 
 4.190 
 
 91.9 
 
 2,220 
 
 25.6 
 
 169.4 
 
 
 10.065 
 \ .012 
 
 
 
 spiral cut, 12 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 {/u>e 
 
 Do 
 
 24 
 
 do 
 
 45 
 
 IS. 46 
 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 
 404 
 
 4. 100 
 
 91.8 
 
 2,220 
 
 25.6 
 
 182.0 
 
 
 .012 
 
 
 
 Weighted av- 
 
 
 
 
 
 395 
 
 4. 305 
 
 91. 8 
 
 2,220 
 
 25.6 
 
 176.3 
 
 14.9 
 
 
 
 
 erages. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
T\OK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANICAL PULP. 
 
 27 
 
 TABLE 7. Quantitative and commercial test on mixtures of spruw, jack pine, and hemlock 
 Power consumption and production. 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 . 
 
 
 g 
 
 
 
 
 4 
 
 .2 
 
 4 
 
 3 
 
 f 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 .a 
 
 1 
 
 4 
 
 3 
 
 a 
 
 i 
 
 Ig 
 
 ^ 
 
 I 
 
 
 2 
 
 
 Kind of stone. 
 
 rcial run num 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 4 
 g 
 
 e per square 
 pocket area. 
 
 tions per mini 
 
 ?ral speed per i 
 
 W SH 
 p 
 
 ry pulp in 24 1 
 
 ower per ton 
 pulp in 24 hot 
 
 ry pulp per 1(X 
 bone-dry woe 
 
 per cubic fool 
 dry wood. 
 
 II 
 
 Qgs per 100 cut 
 bone-dry wooc 
 
 screen slots. 
 
 
 a 
 a 
 
 
 1 
 
 I 
 
 | 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 s 
 
 ra 
 
 II 
 
 o 
 
 1*" 
 
 i 
 
 M 
 
 O 
 t> 
 
 ! 
 
 "3 
 
 
 3 
 
 
 i! 
 
 PH 
 
 PS 
 
 PH 
 
 < 
 
 PQ 
 
 n 
 
 PQ 
 
 F 
 
 J 
 
 & 
 
 w 
 
 $ spruce; hem- 
 lock: 
 
 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 
 Ft. 
 
 
 Tows. 
 
 
 Tb<t 
 
 ibs 
 
 7T 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 In. 
 
 Lombard 
 
 46A 
 
 /Straight cut, \ r ft 
 \ Stothainch. 1 Ol 
 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 
 2,450 
 
 392.0 
 
 4.275 
 
 91.7 
 
 
 
 152.5 
 
 
 (0.065 
 \ .012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hemlock: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Lombard 
 
 46 B 
 
 rln 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 
 2,450 
 
 413.0 
 
 4.885 
 
 84.6 
 
 
 
 175.5 
 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Spruce: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Lombard 
 
 46C 
 
 do 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 
 2,450 
 
 407.0 
 
 4.878 
 
 83.5 
 
 
 
 160.0 
 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 J spruce; hem- 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 lock: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Lombard 
 
 49A 
 
 Straight cut, 
 3 to the inch; 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 
 360.4 
 
 4.880 
 
 73.8 
 
 
 
 155.0 
 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 spiral cut, 12 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hemlock: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Lombard 
 
 49B 
 
 do 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 
 370.0 
 
 4.885 
 
 75.7 
 
 
 
 168 3 
 
 
 f .065 
 \.012 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 COMMERCIAL RUNS. 
 
 spruce; ^hem- 
 lock: ' 
 
 Lombard 
 Do 
 
 46A 
 46A 
 
 (Straight cut, 
 1 3 to the inch; 
 | spiral cut, 12 
 [ to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 |, 
 
 50 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 20.5 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 
 175 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 
 2,445 
 2,445 
 
 426.0 
 
 425.0 
 432.0 
 
 5. 660 
 
 5. 135 
 4.905 
 
 75.3 
 
 82.7 
 88.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 149.0 
 173 
 
 
 10.065 
 \ .012 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 ( .065 
 \ .012 
 
 - . T 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 / .065 
 t .012 
 
 Do 
 
 46A 
 
 do 
 
 
 
 176 3 
 
 
 ^ jack pine; 
 spruce; | 
 hemlock: 
 
 Lombard 
 Do 
 
 51 
 51 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 [Straight cut, 
 1 3 to the inch; 
 | spiral cut, 12 
 I to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 
 
 
 16.3 
 
 t 
 
 
 
 
 427.2 
 
 "" 
 
 442.0 
 444.0 
 
 5.175 
 
 5.705 
 5.420 
 
 83.0 
 
 77.5 
 81.9 
 
 2,030 
 
 f24. 8 \ 
 \23. 76f 
 
 - 
 
 169.0 
 167.6 
 
 / 
 
 
 175 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 2,445 
 
 I- 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 20.5 
 
 
 
 
 
 175.0 
 
 
 i jack pine; 
 hemlock: 
 
 Lombard 
 Do 
 
 52 
 
 52 
 52 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 ("Straight cut, 
 1 3 to the inch; 
 | spiral cut, 12 
 1. to the inch, 
 do 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 443.0 
 
 _ " 
 
 398.0 
 
 425.0 
 406.5 
 
 5.575 
 
 - '_. 
 
 4.550 
 
 4.350 
 3.950 
 
 79.4 
 
 :== 
 
 87.5 
 
 97.7 
 103.0 
 
 2,232 
 
 '_!- 
 
 (25. 6 } 
 
 i 24 - 7 t 
 l29.ll) 
 
 -..-..- 
 
 171.0 
 160.0 
 
 17.4 
 
 
 
 " -^* 
 
 f .065 
 \ .012 
 
 / .065 
 \.012 
 / .065 
 (.012 
 
 } 
 
 
 
 20.5 
 
 20.5 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 
 175 
 175 
 
 
 1" 
 
 50 
 50 
 
 2,445 
 
 2,445 
 2,445 
 
 
 
 
 
 185.4 
 179 4 
 
 .... 
 
 Do 
 
 do 
 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 
 
 
 17.6 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 414.0 
 
 4.310 
 
 96.3 
 
 2,230 
 
 f25. 2 \ 
 \26. 75/ 
 
 177.7 
 
 
 
 /" 
 
 
 
 
28 JACK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOR MECHANIC 
 
 8. Commercial tests on hemlock Power consumptic .7 prodi 
 
 Kind of stone. 
 
 Commercial run number. 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 Pressure on 14-inch cylinder. 
 
 Pressure per square inch, 
 pocket area. 
 
 Revolutions per minute. 
 
 Peripheral speed per minute. 
 
 Average horsepower to 
 grinder. 
 
 Bone-dry pulp in 24 hours. 
 
 Horsepower per ton bone- 
 dry pulp in 24 hours. 
 
 Bone-dry pulp per 100 cubic 
 feet bone-dry wood. 
 
 Weight per cubic foot bone- 
 dry wood. 
 
 Average temperature of 
 grinding. 
 
 Screenings per 100 cubic feet 
 bone-dry wood. 
 
 Size of screen slots. 
 
 Manufacturers' . . 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 14 
 
 /Spiral cut, 10 
 \ to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 Lbs. 
 }50 
 
 50 
 50 
 
 Lbs. 
 20.5 
 
 20.5 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 175 
 175 
 
 Ft. 
 
 2,435 
 
 2,435 
 2,435 
 
 331.0 
 356.0 
 353.0 
 
 Tons. 
 
 2.855 
 
 3.795 
 3.425 
 
 116.0 
 94.0 
 103.0 
 
 Lbs. 
 1,955 
 
 2,030 
 2,122 
 
 Lbs. 
 24.8 
 
 24.8 
 24.8 
 
 F. 
 173.5 
 
 168.0 
 173.0 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 .10. C 
 
 In. 
 (0 065 
 ( .C12 
 1 .065 
 1 .012 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 Do 
 
 14 
 
 do . 
 
 Manufacturers' .. 
 Do 
 
 M-l 
 
 14-1 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 (Spiral cut, 10 
 \ to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 
 349.0 
 
 363.0 
 371.5 
 
 3.417 
 
 103.1 
 
 2,048 
 
 i - 
 
 2,070 
 2,080 
 
 24.8 
 
 171.4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,432 
 2,432 
 
 }50 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 20.5 
 
 175 
 175 
 
 4.195 
 4.068 
 
 86.5 
 91.4 
 
 24.8 
 24.8 
 
 165.5 
 108. 
 
 18.6 
 18.5 
 
 f .065 
 \ .012 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 Manufacturers'... 
 Do 
 
 8 
 8 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 {Straight cut, 
 10 to the 
 inch. 
 
 do 
 
 
 
 
 
 368.2 
 
 4.115 
 
 89.5 
 
 87.7 
 
 84.2 
 97.5 
 
 2,077 
 
 24.8 
 
 167.0 
 
 165.5 
 
 159.0 
 177.6 
 
 
 f .065 
 \ .012 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 / .065 
 V .012 
 
 F 
 
 40 
 40 
 
 
 
 
 16.4 
 
 16.4 
 16.4 
 
 176 
 
 176 
 176 
 
 2,450 
 
 2,450 
 2,450 
 
 346.0 
 
 287.0 
 270.0 
 
 306.0 
 
 3.945 
 
 3.410 
 2.772 
 
 2,118 
 
 2,085 
 2,038 
 
 24.8 
 
 24.8 
 24.8 
 
 24.8 
 
 15.5 
 18.6 
 
 Do 
 
 8 
 
 do 
 
 Manufacturers'. . . 
 Do 
 
 23 
 ?3 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 {Diamond 
 point, cut 10 
 to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 
 
 3.435 
 
 89.7 
 
 109.5 
 
 87.5 
 83.9 
 
 2,083 
 
 
 
 2,040 
 
 2,125 
 2,130 
 
 24.8 
 
 24.8 
 
 24.8 
 24.8 
 
 168.4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 }. 
 
 40 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 16.4 
 16.4 
 
 176 
 
 176 
 176 
 
 2,440 
 
 2,440 
 2,432 
 
 300.0 
 
 318.0 
 281.0 
 
 2.740 
 
 3.635 
 3.350 
 
 186.5 
 
 172.0 
 162.0 
 
 13.7 
 
 32.7 
 20.3 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 f .065 
 \ .012 
 f .065 
 \ .012 
 
 Do 
 
 ?3 
 
 do 
 
 Lombard 
 
 30 
 "W 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 {Straight cut, 
 4 to the inch; 
 spiral cut, 10 
 to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 
 
 
 
 301.0 
 
 3.300 
 
 92.4 
 
 2,105 
 
 24.8 
 
 172.8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < .065 
 \ .012 
 
 f .065 
 \ .012 
 
 40 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 16.4 
 
 176 
 176 
 
 2,432 
 2,432 
 
 340.0 
 315.0 
 
 4.075 
 3. ,170 
 
 83.5 
 99.4 
 
 2,080 
 2,140 
 
 24.8 
 
 24.8 
 24.8 
 
 25.2 
 
 25.2 
 24.84 
 
 176.0 
 179.5 
 
 16.5 
 
 17.8 
 
 Do 
 
 Lombard 
 
 50 
 r .O 
 
 Weighted 
 
 averages. 
 
 (Straight cut, 
 3 to the inch; 
 spiral cut, 12 
 to the inch. 
 
 do 
 
 
 
 331.0 
 
 417.0 
 
 417.0 
 422.5 
 
 418.0 
 
 3.725 
 
 _-- 
 
 4.05 
 
 3.815 
 5.300 
 
 89.5 
 
 2,102 
 
 177.0 
 
 184.5 
 
 185.0 
 170.6 
 
 
 
 
 
 175 
 
 175 
 
 175 
 
 
 
 
 1" 
 
 60 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 20.5 
 20.5 
 
 2,445 
 
 2,445 
 2,445 
 
 103.0 
 
 109.2 
 79.7 
 
 2,195 
 
 2,19 
 2,070 
 
 11.2 
 11.2 
 
 ( .065 
 \ .012 
 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 / .065 
 \ .012 
 
 Do 
 
 Do 
 
 50 
 
 do... 
 
 
 Weighted 
 averages. 
 
 
 
 4.370 
 
 97.5 
 
 2,160 
 
 25.1 
 
 180.3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.1ATK PINE AND HEMLOCK FOE 
 
 A.L PULP. 
 
 TABLE 9. Quantitative and commercial tests on spruce Power consumption and 
 
 production. 
 
 
 
 
 A 
 
 g 
 
 | 
 
 % 
 
 fc. 
 
 c5 
 
 a a 
 
 5<6 
 
 
 
 
 3>- 
 
 
 
 
 
 g 
 
 C3 
 
 a, 
 
 & 
 
 > 
 
 
 3 
 
 CM 3 
 
 
 3 
 
 -H^ 
 
 +2 
 
 
 
 
 
 S-S 
 
 'I 
 
 ftjg 
 
 k 
 
 
 a 
 
 s$ 
 
 wl? 
 
 P 
 
 ll 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 Kind of 
 
 stone. 
 
 un numbei 
 
 Kind of burr. 
 
 f 
 
 If 
 
 evolutions 
 ute 
 
 il 
 
 |a 
 
 ft 
 
 i 
 
 11 
 
 if 
 
 > 
 
 |1 
 
 i 
 
 orsepower 
 bone-dry 
 24 hours. 
 
 1! 
 
 r eight per c 
 bone-dry 
 
 G) So 
 C3 o 
 
 P 
 
 1!| 
 
 g > 
 
 5 
 
 g 
 
 
 PH 
 
 
 PH 
 
 PH 
 
 PH 
 
 PH 
 
 <! 
 
 cq 
 
 W 
 
 PH 
 
 P 
 
 ^ 
 
 CO 
 
 CQ 
 
 
 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 
 Ft. 
 
 
 lows. 
 
 
 L6s. 
 
 Z6. 
 
 k 
 
 Lfts. 
 
 In. 
 
 Lombard . . 
 
 1 
 
 Straight cut, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 to the inch; 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 
 2 445 
 
 403 
 
 4 988 
 
 80.8 
 
 
 
 171.0 
 
 
 fO.065 
 
 
 
 spiral cut, 12 
 
 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \0. 012 
 
 
 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 
 do 
 
 1 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 Il75 
 
 2 445 
 
 399 
 
 4 525 
 
 88 1 
 
 
 
 175 5 
 
 
 10.065 
 
 
 
 
 \ 50 
 
 20.5 
 
 f 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \0. 012 
 
 
 
 Weigh ted 
 
 
 
 
 
 401 
 
 4 810 
 
 83 5 
 
 2 480 
 
 28 4 
 
 172 6 
 
 17 2 
 
 
 
 
 averages. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 2 
 
 Straight cut, 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 200 
 
 2,795 
 
 398 
 
 4.245 
 
 93.8 
 
 
 
 164.3 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 to the inch; 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 spiralcut, 12 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 9. 
 
 do 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 200 
 
 2,795 
 
 408 
 
 3.995 
 
 102.0 
 
 
 
 171. S 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 2 
 
 do 
 
 40 
 
 16 4 
 
 >oo 
 
 2 795 
 
 394 
 
 4 175 
 
 94 4 
 
 
 
 166 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Weigh ted 
 
 
 
 
 
 402 
 
 4 120 
 
 97 5 
 
 2 012 
 
 22 72 
 
 168.0 
 
 13 75 
 
 
 
 
 averages. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Straight cut 
 
 20 
 
 8 2 
 
 175 
 
 2 445 
 
 101 
 
 1 215 
 
 157.0 
 
 2,300 
 
 27.66 
 
 163.0 
 
 9.82 
 
 
 
 
 3 to the inch; 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 spiral cut, 12 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 to the inch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 
 
 do.. 
 
 40 
 
 16.4 
 
 175 
 
 2,445 
 
 333 
 
 3.025 
 
 110.0 
 
 2,408 
 
 27.66 
 
 166.5 
 
 17.8 
 
 
 
 5 
 
 ....do. 
 
 60 
 
 24.65 
 
 1 75 
 
 2, 445 
 
 454 
 
 5.255 
 
 86.4 
 
 2,415 
 
 27.66 
 
 152.2 
 
 18.6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 TABLE 10. Furnish to beater on basis of 1,000 pounds of stock Experimental and 
 
 commercial papers. 
 
 EXPERIMENTAL PAPER. 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 a 
 
 a 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 PH 
 
 <i 
 
 1 
 
 P 
 
 
 
 
 ft 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 ffi 
 
 W) 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 bo . 
 
 "d 
 
 bo . 
 
 
 
 
 ' rt 08 
 
 s 
 
 T3 . 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 Run. 
 
 
 X 
 
 0) O 
 
 *P 
 
 a p 
 
 
 
 
 C3 
 
 3 
 
 d 
 
 a 
 
 tf 
 
 
 % 
 
 g 
 
 3 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ft^ 
 
 
 
 
 T3 * 
 
 .2 
 
 S 
 
 g 
 
 bo 
 
 
 a 
 
 3 
 
 a 
 
 o> 
 
 h 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 ti 
 3 
 
 jr 
 
 
 
 ,a 
 
 3 
 
 03 
 
 3 
 
 P 
 
 
 & 
 
 w 
 
 CO 
 
 w 
 
 
 CO 
 
 ^ 
 
 o 
 
 PH 
 
 CO 
 
 P 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 r,fc, 
 
 'Lint. 
 
 Lbs 
 
 Lfefc 
 
 Lbs 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 Lbs. 
 
 02. 
 
 0?, 
 
 02. 
 
 02. 
 
 0^. 
 
 Commercial 
 
 1 A 
 
 50 
 
 950 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 067 
 
 3.33 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 
 250 
 
 750 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 067 
 
 3 33 
 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 24 
 
 
 
 
 750 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 
 3.6 
 
 0.15 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 46 
 
 250 
 
 250 
 
 500 
 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 
 4 
 
 15 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 50 
 
 250 
 
 
 750 
 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 
 3 7 
 
 20 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 51 
 
 250 
 
 250 
 
 250 
 
 250 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 
 4 1 
 
 15 
 
 
 
 Do 
 
 
 
 
 500 
 
 250 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 
 20 
 
 
 4.3 
 
 .15 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 COMMERCIAL PAPER. 
 
 No 2 white manila 
 
 
 210 
 
 395 
 
 395 
 
 
 8 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 2 8 
 
 
 
 
 Butchers manila 
 
 
 <>10 
 
 263 
 
 527 
 
 
 >n 
 
 ^0 
 
 26.7 
 
 
 
 
 2.75 
 
 0.83 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 BERKELEY 
 
 Return to desk from which borrowed. 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 20Apr'50F;