1 F 890 SPEECH HOI. ISAAC I. STEVENS, DELEGATE FROM ON THE WASHINGTON AND OREGON WAR CLAIMS. DELIVERED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES, MAY 31, 1858. WASHINGTON: FEINTED BY LEMUEL TOWERS 1858. pee ,S94 X SPEECH OF HON. ISAAC I, STEVENS, DELEGATE FROM WASHINGTON TERRITORY, ON THE WASHINGTON AND OEEGON WAK CLAIMS. DELIYEEED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, MA.T 81, 1858. The House being; in committee of the Whole on the state of the Union, Mr. ISAAC I. STEVENS said: I take this occasion, Mr. Chairman, to present a few observations in regard to the Washington and Oregon war claim. This is a matter certainty of some little consequence, for it involves no less a sum than six millions of dollars. Incident to this, however, is another question of more importance still, namely: the character and honor of the people of those distant Territories, and the hon-or of our whole country. One question touches the Treasury of the United States, and the other the good name of the people of the United States. I shall dwell upon them both. I shall endeavor to vindicate the character and conduct of the people of those Territories, and the operations undertaken by the authori ties of those Territories for the purpose of suppressing Indian hostilities. I shall endeavor to show that those operations were necessary, that they were econom ical, and that they are entitled to the confidence and sympathy of the country ; and finally I shall endeavor to show by precedents, by the course of the Gov ernment in regard to other portions of the country, that we have a right to expect prompt and ample justice from the Congress of the United States. Mr. Chairman, it has been often charged against us, that that war was brought on by outrages upon the rights of the Indians ; that it was gotten up for the purpose of speculation : and that it was the treaties which caused the war. Well, sir, suppose the treaties did cause the war; suppose we did have vagobonds in that country who committed outrages upon the Indians ; suppose some few citizens were operated upon by the motive of making a speculation out of the war; if these things be true, did they make it any less the duty of the people, and of the authorities of the Territories, a war having come upon them, to protect the settlements ? What account would an executive have had to render, who, when he heard that the Indians were devastating the settle ments, burning the houses, and massacreing the women and children, had de clined to protect those settlements on the ground that here and there a white man had outraged Jthe Indians, and had driven them to arms? Suppose the treaties did incite the war, was it the fault of the people of those Territories ? Was the appointment of commissioners, the calling together of councils, and the forming of treaties their act? Not at all. It was the act of your Government. It was the act of your Congress. It was done under the orders of your Presi dent. The people of the Territories certainly were not responsible, nor were the executives of those people, responsible. Sir, it does seem to me that it would be trifling with the ^intelligence and insulting the understandings of gentlemen of this Committee, if I were to undertake to defend the people of those Territories from the charge of having brought about this war for purposes of speculation. Who are the people of those Territories? How did they get there? Were they mere vagabonds and outcasts? Did they go there without law, and give to the world an example of lawlessness and insubordination I No, sir, they were American citizens, the very choice and flower of your yeo manry. They went there carrying with them the arts and arms, the' laws and institutions of their country, and there they planted empire and civilization. How is this Government, and how are the people of these States known upon that coast ? It is through the eighty odd thousand people there who have given to the world from their first settlement, an example of a law-abiding, an indus trious, a patriotic, a suffering ay, and a heroic people. You are known there through them, and through the institutions which they have,carried there with them. Sir, when men talk about vagabonds in that country, I might with propriety refer them to Baltimore, and to Philadelphia, and to New York, and to all your large cities, and even to this National Capital. Have you no vagabonds? Have you no courts, no juries, no jails, no peni tentiaries? Why, even here, murder stalks at noon-day, and has marched in procession. It has controlled the elections of a neighboring city; and this too, in your densely populated old States this too, in your cities, where civilization and refinement reign. I say to gentlemen who fling the term vagabond into our faces, first pull the beam out of your own eye, and then you can see clearly to pull the mote out of your brother's eye. But, Mr. Chairman, I most emphatically deny all these charges, and I slunteers of Washington, fought three hundred Indians, killing some forty, and striking a great blow upon the hostile Indians. Go with me rto the battle of Council's prairie, on the shores of Puget Sound, where one hundred and sixty volunteers fought two hundred Indians, and defeated them, killing thirty of their number. This movement of ShawJs was something more than a twelve days march. Three columns of troops moved simultaneously from the sound, from the Co lumbia Valley, and from the Nez Perces country, meeting at the Walla- Walla, within a single day, and then a vigorous movement with a portion of this force was made across the Blue mountains, a forced march, some sixty miles in one night and a day, when the enemy was struck and completely routed. The troops from the sound crossed the Cascades, snow still on the mountains, and marched some tree hundred miles to the point of rendezvouz. Of all these three columns the arrangements were complete, and the means of transportation ample, the column from the Dalles having in their train forty-five wagons, car rying not only supplies for the troops, but a large quantity of provisions for the friendly Indians. Sir, I say, all honor to the officers and men who conquered the Indians in New Mexico ; but, I ask the Committee, also, to do like honor to the volunteers of Washington and Oregon, who fought the Indians, always being outnumbered, and sometimes more than two to one. I ask, for the people of those Territories, the same measure of justice which has been rendered to the people of New Mexico and the people of Florida. There have been Indian difficulties in Florida, and, within two years, you have had twelve companies of regulars there, and, at least, six companies of volunteers. And, I thank God, that Florida was near enough to the Federal Capital for its governor to come here, post haste, and to procure the recognition of the services of the volunteers of Florida by the General Government. Sir, that force was unquestionably necessary; they fought the Indians, and now, when they have subdued them, it appears that there were about one hundred and sixty-two Indians there, including women and children. You sent that force against less than one hundred warriors, and the expenses incurred by the Florida volunteers have been paid, and paid 'promptly, by this Federal Government. So with New Mexico: the expenses of the volunteers in New Mexico have been paid by the General Government, and the provision to pay them was put in the army appropriation bill. So in the case of California : Congress made an appr6priation to pay the Fremont riflemen, and organized a board of three army officers to inquire into the 11 balance of the claims. The army officers made an examination ; they reported to the Secretary of War, and, at the very next session of Congress, their awards were provided for in the army appropriation bill. The army appro priation bill, of the session of 1853 and 1854, contained an appropriation of nearly one .million of dollars, for paying the volunteers of California, for ex pense's incurred in suppressing Indian hostilities previous to 1854. We ask the same measure of justice for the people of our Territories that has been already extended to people nearer to you in Florida, New Mexico, and California. I desire now to dwell, for a few moments, on another topic. I contend that the expenses were economical; that they were small; that they were m\ich less than any intelligent and disinterested man, after looking into all the facts, would expect them to be. We had in Washington eighteen hundred and ninety- six men enlisted, and their average term of service was one hundred and twelve days. The total expense of each man, exclusive of pay, was but little over $500 ($507 32.) What is the expense, per man, in the regular service? It was about $1,000 a year, last year, and throwing out the pay, it was about $850. That is the expense of troops in the regular service a large proportion of whom are stationed at the forts and depots on the Atlantic, the Gulf, the Lakes, and the Mississippi river and its tributaries, at points accessible to steam boat navigation. But, sir, when you come to compare the expenses of the regulars with the volunteers, I shall insist that you compare them in like con ditions. It will not do to compare the expenses of the volunteers in Oregon, on the plains of the Walla-Walla, one hundred and fifty miles from our settle ments, protecting those settlements by their gallantry and conduct throughout the winter of 1855-'56, with the expenses of the regular troops lying in their rear, at this very time in garrison at the Dalles, the Cascades, and Vancouver. You must compare their expenses in the field with the expenses of the regulars in the field. Compare the expenses of the volunteers, in their campaign of the Walla- Walla, with the expenses of the regular service in its campaign of the Yaki- rna, and, my word for it, you will find that our expenses were the smallest, per man. In this estimate I mean to include transportation from the depots, at home, as a charge upon the regular service. That is my^ deliberate judgment from a careful examination of the matter. And here, in this comparison, I shall have a charge to make against the regular service. I shall insist that the nineteen dead bodies left on the ground at the Cascades, in consequence of Col. Wright advancing upon the Walla-Walla, and leaving his rear unprotected and insecure, be taken into the account. He did not leave a sufficient garrison at the Cascades. It was attacked by the Indians, held in their possession, (with the exception of one block-house and one house) for twenty-four hours every house, except these, was burned ; nineteen persons were slain, and it compelled a retrograde movement of Wright, already in march for the Walla-Walla, finally caused the abandonment of that movement on the Walla- Walla, and the organization of a new campaign into the Yakima country. Let all these things be taken into the account in a comparison between the services, for, I affirm, no such military blunder was committed in the volunteer service. Sir, I make no point against the regular service. I was bred in that service, and have given to it fourteen years of faithful service. There I have all my early srieuds; there many of the warmest friends of my manhood now are, and I thank heaven that through all the controversies we have had there in refer ence to affairs in those Territories, those men are still my friends. They are ever ready to do their duty; but during the winter of 1855 and 1856 the fron tier east of the Cascade Mountains was protected by the volunteers, while the regulars were in garrison. That is a fact which should stand out, and which I have brought out on this occasion. Mr. Chairman, objection has been made to the allowance, by the commission ers, of two dollars a day for each enlisted man, and two dollars a day for each horse. And yet I have here an official document from the Quartermaster Gene ral showing that no laboring man, no packer, no teamster was employed in the regular army in these Territories during that Indian war for less than sixty dollars per month, and that their pay ranged from that up to $90 per month. I find that for pack mules they have invariably paid three dollars a day. If, 12 then, the regular service is obliged to go into expenses like these in that coun try, paying on an average two dollars and fifty cents a day for common hands, and paying it in cash, why should you object to the volunteers being paid two dollars a day, who have already waited two years for payment? If the re gular service has paid for pack mules three dollars a day, why should you object to pay two dollars a day for the horses used by the volunteers? Sir, these are pregnant facts. But there is another topic which I wish to dwell upon for a moment, and that is the employment of troops for short intervals. I desire to correct an erroneous impression made by reports, which have emanated from the Adjutant General's office. In these reports the expenses of volunteers or militia (who served simply for three months or more) are compared with the expenses of the regular establishment, where the expenses of recruiting and discharging are distributed, over the entire period of enlistment of five years. And in these same reports, also, the expenses of our volunteer service in those two Territories are compared with the expenses of a regiment of infantry simply in depot, having no expenses whatever in the way of movements of troops. N"ow there are certain large contingent expenses incident to raising troops, bringing them into the field, and discharging them. In militia or volunteer service it is distributed over a period of three or six months. In the regular service, over a period of five years. To institute a comparison, therefore, be tween the expenses of the regular and volunteer service for a period of three or six months, these expenses should be thrown out altogether, or the whole of it in each case be included for the equal period of comparison; otherwise a very heavy charge will be made upon the volunteer service and held up against them to their disparagement, when the expense is not because the troops are volunteers or militia, but because they are troops raised for short in tervals of time. So it is very unjust to compare the expenses of our volunteers with the expenses of infantry in depot. The proper comparison is between the expenses of our foot and horse in the field, in these Territories, with the expenses of the foot and horse of the regular service in the field in those Territories. But this is not all. If, in an emergency, you do not resort to volunteers, what will you do ? You must institute a new military system, increase your army largely, and have in depot surplus troops for any emergency which may arise. And, therefore, the true and only just comparison of expense is a com parison of the expenses which we incur under our military s}~stem, relying upon the militia and volunteers of the country in case of emergency, and of the only system that can take its place, viz : that of a large standing army. Suppose that in our Indian difficulties you had this large standing army, and that there had been a surplus of troops at the depots at home to send out there. When you take the cost of transportation, the cost of recruiting, the cost of getting them to the field of action you would find in the case supposed that there would have been an expense of two or three hundred dollars a man, at the very point where the expenses of the volunteers commence. And then when the emergency was over you would have the cost of sending them home again. You, gentlemen, can compute the cost for yourselves. I ask again--if you did not have the volunteer service, what would you do ? You must Lave a standing army large enough for any emergency, doing nothing nine years out of ten. But such statements and comparisons as these, the only just and proper ones, are not made in these reports ; and yet, the mere statement of it will convince the mind that they are just and sound statements and comparisons. If you take the view I have presented, it will be found that in our territories, the expenses of the volunteers per man is much less than the expenses of regulars, if sent from the States there and sent back, as must necessarily have been the case had you been obliged to rely upon regulars alone. Our means of transportation were more economical. We used ox-trains instead of mule-trains, and we carried fifty per cent, more freight per employee than was carried in the trains of the regular service. That is a fact known of all men there. We made at least as rapid trips as the regular service, and we showed that oxen were the proper animals for wagons in that country. But every effort was made to reduce expenses, and the effort was a success ful one. All allowance of extra pay for fatigue service was prohibited in orders, 13 and the accounts for such service were disallowed and thrown out. No such ac counts were submitted to the commissioners appointed bv the Secretary of War under the authority of Congress. This was deemed by many very unjust at the time, as payment for fatigue service was recognised in the army, and the rates established by act of Congress. Our troops did a very lar^e amount of fatigue service, as shown in the block houses built by them" and Ihe roads cut out by them ; one company was especially raised for fatigue duty, and was called the Pioneer company ; most of its members were mechanics, or very experienced axemen, and for many months they were constantly employed at fatigue service. It was emphatically a company of Pioneers as "well as a com pany of fighting men ; the Indians making the'first attack upon them whilst cutting out a road at the battle of C.onnel'S Prairie. I refused Mr. Chairman to allow any extra compensation for fatigue service, because I expected the pay of our troops would have some relations to the price of labor in the country; and for a temporary rapid service organized for an emergency, I did not think the idea of extra pay for fatigue service should be countenanced. In the disposition of public property in the volunteer service of Washington, every exertion was made to guard the rights of the Government. I refused to allow any volunteer to retain one animal even on an appraisal by the officers of the Quartermaster Department, the same to be charged upon the muster- rolls against his pay, but directed every animal to be disposed of at public auction. Everything was sold at public auction for the scrip issued in purchasing. The sales amounted to nearly one hundred and forty thousand dollars, and to this amount was the war debt reduced by these sales. The sales were at a considerable advance on the original cost. Horses which cost from $250 to $400 brought from $200 to $600. Wagons costing $200, were readily sold at $300 ; and oxen were disposed of -at thirty per cent, above cost. This too, after the property had been of course deteriorated by six months active service. The report of J. Ross Brown, Special Agent of the Interior Department, gives so graphic a picture of the condition of the Territory, in 1857, the year following the war, that I cannot do better than quote from his report, as follows: " On the roiid from the Cowlitz Landing to Olympia, a distance of fifty miles, the whole country bears distressing evidences of the disastrous effects of the late war. In 1854, when I first passed through this region, it abounded in fine farms well cultivated, and bearing luxuriant crops of grain. Immigration was rapidly filling up all the vacant lands; and large herds of stock were grazing upon the prairies. From the signs of prosperity then apparent, it was not un reasonable to predict that in the course of three years the products and popu lation would be more than doubled. But, notwithstanding this region was exempt from any actual collision with the Indians, the effects are nearly the same as in other parts of the Territory. All along the road houses are desert ed and going to ruin ; fences are cast down and in a state of decay ; fields, once waving with luxuriant crops of wheat, are desolate ; and but little, if any, stock is to be seen on the broad prairies that formerly bore such inspiring evi dences of life. The few families that remained, either from necessity or incli nation, were forced to erect rude block-houses for their defense, into which they gathered by night during the hostilities, in constant apprehension of attack. These rude defenses still stand at interval? along the road. I mention these facts with a view of showing that, so far, at least, the ' war speculation' charged upon the settlers of Washington Territory presents an unprofitable appearance." There was erected in the Territory, during the war, thirty-one block-houses by the volunteer troops, twenty-one block-houses by the citizens, without assis tance; and some seven block-houses by the troops of the regular service. Some of these block-houses were large establishments, there being space enougn inside the pickets for small houses for the families of the neighborhood, the block houses intended to protect. The name and site of each block-house, as well as the roads and trails cut out by the volunteer service is given in an official docu ment published by order of the Legislature of Washington. Of the whole number of eighteen hundred and ninety-six enlisted men m the Washington volunteers, two hundred aud thirty-six were friendly Indians, aad u two hundred and fifteen citizens of Oregon, leaving fourteen hundred and forty- five citizens of Washington in service from October, 1855, to September, 1856. Their average term of service, as I have before observed, was one hundred and twelve days. Thus it will appear that nearly seven-eighths of our citizens served nearly four months during that war an amount of service that has not certainly its parallel in this, and probably in any other country. In Washington, the volunteers were nearly equally divided between foot and mounted troops. There were one thousand and seventeen men who served as cavalry, and eight hundred and seventy nine who served as infantry. The oper ations on the sound a large portion of the country being very heavily timbered and there being in the timber dense underbrush and fallen logs required that the troops should be principally foot troops. The operations in the interior, it being mostly a prairie country, that all the troops should be mounted. The greater vigor and success .of the volunteer operations East of the Cascades, over those of-the regular service, were due very much to the fact that the volunteers were well mounted, whereas the greater bulk of the regular force was infantry. The volunteers were, however, very superior ih all the qualities of service to th-e regulars. There was scarcely a man in the volunteer service who had not crossed the plains, become inmired to all the routine of camp life, and thoroughly accustomed to moving in that country, either on his horse over the prairie, or on foot through the dense forests. We had no difficulty whatever in raising foot troops, nor in dismounting our horse troops, when, as on the Sound, the operations extended from the prairie region, at the head of the Sound, to the wooded regions eastward, where horses could not be used. The remarks, Mr. Chairman, of Mr. J. Eoss Brown as to the causes of the war, are so pertinent and so just that I will give them at length: " Kam-i-y-a-kan, the chief of the Yakimas, was bitter in his animosity. As early as 1853 he projected a war of extermination against the whole race of Americans within the country. It was his settled determination to make the war general, and he spared no inducements to affect a coalition with the JS"ez Perces, Cayuses, Walla-Wallas, and other tribes. For your information on this point, showing that war actually was premeditated in 1853, I send you enclosed a translation of the letter of Father Pandory, priest at the Atahnam Mission, dated 'April 1858,' to Father Mesplie, at the Dalles, in which he says : ' A chief of the upper Nez Perces has killed thirty head of cattle at a feast given to the nation ; and this number of animals not being sufficient, seven more were killed. The feast was given in order to unite the hearts of the Indians to make declaration of war against the Americans. Th? ough the whole course of the winter I have heard the same thing that the Cayuses and Nez Percys have united themselves for war. During the course of last sping I was in the Cayuse country after they had given a similar feast. I said nothing be cause I thought that they had a sub-agent who would speak. * * I will recount to you what they say. All the Indians upon the left (north) bank of the Columbia, from the Blackfeet to the Chenook, inclusive, are to assemble at the Cayuse country. All on the right bank, through the same extent of coun try, are to assemble on the Simcoe, (on the Yakima,) including those from Nis- qually and the vicinity. The cause of this war is, that the Americans are going to seize their lands.'' u This grave and startling information, so fearfully verified since, was promptly communicated to Major Alvord, who reported it to General Hitchcock, the then commanding officer of the military department on this coast. Major Alvord was censured as an alarmist, and Father Pandory was treated in the same man ner by his superior. " It will be observed that the date of the letter is April, 1853. If the war, therefore, was one of speculation, gotten up by the settlers of Oregon, the scheme should have been frustrated then. Information that a war was actually going to take place that the Indians had avowed it in council was in posses sion of .the commanding officer of the military department. Why did he not expose the speculation ? Why did not the departments in Washington issua orders to the governors of the Territories, apprising them of their knowedge of this scheme, and cause it to be then arrested ? Simply, as I conceive, because 15 no such scheme was ever contemplated, either. then or since. The settlers only asked protection for their lives and property ;" and after both have been freely sacrificed, the charge is, for the first time, brought against them. "But to return a moment to the combination. As no change took place in the Hudson's Bay Company's posts after the treaty of 1846, and their posses sions and appearance of power remained the same as before, the Indians, up to a very recent date, regarded the Territory of Washington as under the influ ence of ' King George.' "The Nisqually's and other tribes of Puget Sound, whose chief inter course had always been with 'King George' men, naturally shared their ani mosity against the Americans. When Governor Stevens treated with them, he found them in a very disaffected condition. It was with difficulty the chiefs could be gotten together. Something had to be done with them, and, under the cir cumstances of difficulty attending the making of these treaties, I am satisfied no public officer could have done better. The treaties were not the cause of the war. I have already;shown that the war had been determined upon long be fore. If Governor Stevens is to blame because he did not so frame the treaties as to stop the war, or stop it by not making treaties at all, then that charge should be specifically brought against him. "Leschi, the celebrated Nisqually chief, was most determined in his hostility. Bold, adventurous, and eloquent, he possessed an unlimited sway over his people, and, by the earnestness of his purpose and the persuasiveness of his arguments, carried all with him who heard him speak. He travelled by day and night, caring neither for hunger nor fatigue; visited the camps of the Yakimas and Klickitats; addressed the councils in terms of eloquence such as they had seldom heard. .He crossed the Columbia, penetrated to southern Oregon, appealed to all the disaffected there. He dwelt upon their wrongs ; painted to them, in the exuberance of his imagination, the terrible picture of the 'polakly illeha,' the land of darkness, where no ray from the sun ever penetrated; where there was torture and death for all the races of Indians; where the sting of an insect killed like the stroke of a spear, and the streams were foul and muddy, so that no living thing could drink of the waters. This was the place where the white men wanted to carry them to. lie called upon them to resist like braves so terrible a fate. The white men were but a hand ful now. They could all be killed at once, and then others would fear to come. But if there was no war, they would grow strong and many, and soon put all the Indians in their big ships and send them off to that terrible land, where tortue and death awaited them. "It may readily be suposed that a rude and ignorant people, naturally prone to superstition, were not slow in giving credence to these fearful stories. Each tribe had its grievance from the north to the south. Common interest bound them in their compact against a common enemy. "The Mormons, at this time, had also sent their emissaries among them to spread the disaffection, In the Simcoe, at a council of the tribes in 1854, a chief from the Monrnon country urged them to war. The talk of this chief, as detailed by a friendly Indian who was in the council, was to this effect: That far in the desert there lived the greatest people on earth, who controlled the sun. He had been among them and talked with them, and they had sent him here to say what they were. They could strike dead anybody at any distance; they could make the sun stand still; they could make powder and muskets, and they were the friends oi' the Indians. The Americans were the enemies of the Indians. They wanted the Indians to kill them all. They would send them powder and muskets, &c. "That the Mormons did furnish several of the tribes with ammunition is proved by the narrative of Captain Shaw, of the Walla- Walla volunteers. At the last battle fought up there, he found powder, muskets, balls, &c., among the Indians bearing the Mormon brand. "George B. Simpson, late interpreter and local agent at the Cascades, who originally came to Salt Lake as an agent for the Salt Lake mails, states, from his own knowledge, that the Mormons sent out emissaries among all the tribes of Indians prior to the war, urging them to unite in exterminating the Americans. "But the plan of operations had not been sufficiently matured. Some of the 16 tribes were too impatient to wait till the proper time had arrived. In the Rummer of 1855, after the discovery of the Colville mine?, a general rush took place there. The first man murdered was Mattice, a miner, who was on his way there with a considerable amount of money and provisions. He was tilled soon after desending the Snoqualimie pass by a party of Indians supposed to be Yakimas. Near the same time, Fantjoy, another miner, was killed. These were both respectable men from the State of Maine. They were proprietors of a coal mine on the Danamish. The murders on the White river occurred some two mouths after. Agent Bolon, hearing of the Yakima murders, crossed over from the Dalles to see the chief Kamiakin. Ouahi, another prominent chief, was present in camp. Bolon spent the night there, no doubt remonstrating with them for their acts. Next day, as he was riding back, he was overtaken by two or three Indians, who rode along with him in an apparently friendly manner. One lagged behind, and, while the others engaged his attention, shot him in the back. He was then dragged from his horse, scalped and partly burnt. One of the murderers is said to be a son of the chief Ouahi. "On the 8th or 9th of October the Indians of southern Oregon began the work of extermination. They slaughtered, indiscriminately, men, women, and children. At or about the same date the war had opened in "Washington Terri tory. The movement was simultaneous, and could only have been the result of concert; but the Indians themselves have since freely admitted that their plan embraced all parts of the country from north to south. " I will not undertake to follow up the history of the war to a later period, Its peculiar features have been represented officially on both sides, and its pro gress and termination are matters of public record. "Upon a careful perusal of all the despatches, I find nothing to sustain the charge of speculation. No person can visit the Territories of Oregon and Washington, converse with the people, see them on their farms and at their daily labors, and consider their true interests, without coming to the conclusion that such a charge is absurd and monstrous. What could they hope to gain 1 Few of them had anything to spare upon which to base a speculation. A farmer is well off who has his fields fenced in, a few head of oxen, and three or four cows. If he got treble price for his stock, the sale, upon an unlimited credit, would have been a sacrifice to him. His farm must go to ruin. The interests of the settlers of nearly every pursuit are nearly identical. Their future prospects depend chiefly upon the prosperity of the country, the increase of emigration, enhancement in the value of property, seourity of life, opening of new facilities for the transportation of their products. All this was diamet rically opposed to a war. No compensation that government could make would atone for the murder of families, the stoppage of labor everywhere, the loss of time, the suspension of emigration, and the numerous evils resulting from this disastrous conflict. "The commissioners at Vancouver have faithfully and impartially performed their duty. Whatever sum they may have decided upon in estimating this war debt, I hold that amount to be justly due, and trust that Congress will at once provide for its extinguishment." In conclusion. Mr. Chairman, I ask for the people of those Territories, prompt and equal justice at the hands of this Congress ; I ask, in the name of their patriotism and heroic services and sufferings, for the immediate liquidation of their claims. A commission appointed under its authority a commission re presenting this Government, and not the people of these Territories a commis sion, who, if they had any bias or prejudice, were biased and prejudiced against us, have investigated the whole question, have made their awards, have submitted their report, 7ind that report with the approval of the War Depart ment, is now before Congress. We ask firmly and emphatically for the endorse ment of this report, and the payment of these awards, the present session of Congress. Lithomount Pamphlet Binder Gaylord Bros. Makers Stockton, Calif. PAT. JAN 21, 1908