h CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND OF UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF BY FUEDERICK C. MILLS, M. A. Sometime Garth Fellow in Economics Columbia University SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE Faculty of Political Science Columbia University NEW YORK I917 EXCHANGE Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/contemporarytheoOOmillrich CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND OF UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF BY FREDERICK C. MILLS, M. A. Sometime Garth Fellow in Economics Columbia University SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE Faculty of Political Science Columbia University NEW YORK I917 ..^-^^ Copyright, 191 7 BY FREDERICK C. MILLS lO^ TO MY MOTHER LILY NIGHTINGALE MILLS PREFACE Certain explanations of the choice and arrangement of material in this monograph are necessary. The subject of unemployment is one which ramifies into many channels. An exhaustive survey of the field being impossible, the necessity of severely limiting the study to certain lines of investigation involved the neg- lect of other equally important phases of the question. So far as has been possible the work has been held strictly to a study of theories as to the causes of the modern phenomena of unemployment and as to the methods by which unemployment can be prevented or relieved. Facts concerning the extent of unemployment have been touched upon only where they have a bearing upon either of these two subjects. Though the paper has been prepared primarily to present present-day theories, its scope has been slightly enlarged so as to include, on the side of theory, a brief statement of the treatment of the subject of unemploy- ment by the classical economists, and, on the side of practical relief, as representing the working-out of cer- tain theories, a summary of the treatment of the able- bodied poor under the English Poor Law. A brief compendium of the course of tramp and vagrancy legis- lation in the various states of the United States is also included. It was felt that without some such foundation the study of contemporary theories would have been too far divorced from practical relief and from previous eco- nomic thought. 7] 7 »ap»^*-^ 8 PREFACE [8 With the exception of some early study by Henry C. Carey, Francis A. Walker, Henry George and a few re- lief administrators, the subject of unemployment is one that has only recently attracted attention in the United States. The course of recent opinion in this country on this subject has been largely influenced by continental and, especially, by English thought. It is in the latter country that scientific method has been most effectively applied to the study of this problem. This exposition begins, accordingly, with a treatment of the development of English practice and of present English theories on the subject. The method adopted for the arrangement and presen- tation of the material involve the breaking-up of the complete theories advanced by the various writers in order to present their various views on each of the main theories that are held today. This arrangement sacri- fices the possibility of comparing the views of one au- thority, as a unified whole, with those of another ; but it makes possible the full presentation of each of the main types of theory without the repetition and disorganiza- tion that would result from the full statement, in chrono- logical order, of the complete program of each thinker considered. The definitions given to the term ** unemployment " by the various authorities cited vary widely, some using it to cover merely the involuntary idleness of able-bodied workers, others cloaking under it all idleness, whatso- ever its cause or nature. The limiting extent to which certain authorities apply the term is indicated in the con- sideration of their theories. Throughout this paper, how- ever, unless otherwise noted, the term is used in a broad sense ; in the writer's opinion the vagrant and other types of '' unemployables " are legitimate elements of the 9] PREFACE 9 problem of unemployment, even though the social or industrial cause be one step further removed than in the case of the temporarily unemployed wage earner. The inclusion in the present paper of a study of French and German theories has not been possible. Important contributions to the subject have been made by conti- nental students and by continental practice. It is hoped that it will be possible to make such a survey at some time in the future. The writer desires gratefully to acknowledge his in- debtedness to those who have aided him in the prepara- tion of this monograph. Professors Carl C. Plehn and Jessica B. Peixotto of the University of California have given helpful advice and criticism. Sincere thanks are due Professor Henry R. Seager of Columbia University for valuable assistance in the revision of the manuscript and in the preparation of proof. To Professor Carleton H. Parker of the University of Washington the writer stands deeply obligated for the enthusiasm which he has contributed to the performance of this work. CONTENTS CHAPTER I FAGK The Development of English Unemployment Theory and Remedial Practice 1. The Classical Economists on Unemployment 13 2. The Able Bodied Under the English Poor Law 22 3. The Unemployed Workman Act 31 4. Board of Trade Labor Exchanges 36 5. The National Insurance Act 38 CHAPTER n Contemporary English Theories of Unemployment and of Unemployment Relief 1. Loss and Lack of Industrial Quality 42 2. Proposed Remedies for Qualitative Maladjustments 52 3. Industrial Fluctuations 59 4. Proposed Remedies for Unemployment Resulting from Indus- trial Fluctuations • . . . 67 5. The Labor Reserve 84 6. Proposed Remedies for Under-employment 90 7. The Personal Equation in the Problem of Unemployment. . . 100 8. Proposed Remedies for Unemployment due to Personal Failings 104 9. Unemployment Insurance 107 10. The Relief of the Unemployed 113 CHAPTER III The Development of American Unemployment Theory and Remedial Practice 1. Miscellaneous Types of Early Theory 118 2. The Early American Economists on Unemployment 124 3. Methods of Practical Relief 127 4. Tramp and Vagrancy Legislation in the United States 130 II] II 12 CONTENTS [l2 CHAPTER IV Contemporary American Theories of Unemployment and of Unemployment Relief PASK 1. General Statement 138 2. The Relation of Immigration to Unemployment 146 3. The Floating Laborer 157 CHAPTER V i Conclusion 163 Appendix I. American Statistics on Unemployment 165 Appendix II. References 170 CHAPTER I The Development of English Unemployment Theory and Remedial Practice I. the classical economists on unemployment The period during which the classical system of eco- nomics of the Manchester School was being formulated was one characterized by distress from unemployment at least equally severe with any of more recent years.' Yet we find no exposition of unemployment as such. Cer- tain problems closely connected with that subject are discussed, but chief emphasis is usually placed upon an aspect other than that bearing upon the question under consideration. Thus the possibility of general over- production and " glut" is a favorite bone of controversy, but the point with which the economists are primarily concerned is whether profits could thus be reduced to zero, not whether the resulting flooding of the market would throw men out of work. However, there is a re- ^ Sir Robert Giffen, in his inaugural address as President of the Royal Statistical Society in 1883, stated "... the poor are to some . . . extent, fewer, and those who remain poor are, individually, twice as well off on the average as they were fifty years ago." Quoted, Webb and Freeman, Seasonal Trades (London, 1912), p. 7. In Essays in Finance (second series), p. 379, Mr. Giffen writes: *' . . . periodic starvation was in fact the condition of the masses of the working men throughout the Kingdom fifty years ago." Quoted, Seasonal Trades, p. 7. Cf. also "Distress of Laboring Classes since 1815." T. R. Mal- thus, Principles of Political Economy (Boston, 1821), p. 379, et seq. 13] 13 14 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [14 lation more or less intimate between many of the modern theories and those set forth by the men of this school. A summarized statement of their views will pave the way for the presentation of later developments in this field. On the question of the irregularity of employment Adam Smith says the first and, so far as his followers in this school are concerned, the last word. As one of the five classic reasons for the inequalties of wages between different industries Smith includes relative constancy or inconstancy of employment.^ The more inconstant the employment the higher will be the wage, for " What he earns . . . while he is employed, must not only maintain him while he is idle, but make him some compensation for those anxious and desponding moments which the thought of so precarious a situation must sometimes occasion." This principle is repeated by Smith's succes- sors for over one hundred years, practically unquestioned except by Senior, who disagrees as to the increased an- nual real wage. "But this evil (despondency because of precarious situation) is compensated, and in most dis- positions more than compensated, by the diminution of his toil. We believe, after all, that nothing is so much disliked as steady, regular labor; and that the oppor- tunities of idleness afforded by an occupation of irregular employment are so much more than an equivalent for its anxiety to reduce the wages of such occupations below the common average." " Senior contends, however, that the periods during which capital is unproductive must be compensated by a surplus profit when it is produc- tively used. ^ Wealth of Nations, book i. chap. x. 'Nassau W. Senior, Political Economy (6th ed., London, 1872), pp. 207-8. Also quoted in Seasonal Trades, p. 10. 15] DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH UNEMPLOYMENT 15 Thomas R. Malthus, following Adam Smith, made two important contributions to the subject under con- sideration. His doctrine of population, at least as it was first enunciated, and as interpreted by later fol- lowers, exercised a vicious negative effect on the course of scientific study of the problems connected with desti- tution. The effect it had of completely overshadowing certain other doctrines advanced by Malthus in connec- tion with this same subject has been almost equally re- grettable. His theory of the pressure of population on the means of subsistence, the resulting destitution being merely one of the natural positive checks to an excess of numbers, is too well known to require detailing here.^ Unemployment, according to this view, is caused solely by an excess of workers, and can only be dealt with by allowing full play to the rigorous process of natural selection. " A man who is born into the world already possessed, if he cannot get subsistence from his parents on whom he has just demand, and if society do not want his labours, has no claim of rt^ht to the smallest portion of food, and, in fact, has no business to be where he is. At Nature's mighty feast there is no vacant cover for him. She tells him to be gone, and will quickly execute her own orders if he does not work upon the compas- sion of some of her guests." ^ His theory is essentially one of surplus population. Malthus's doctrines were eagerly accepted by the upper classes, for they lifted from their shoulders not only responsibility for the con- dition of the poor, but also responsibility for active effort toward social improvement. Malthus' relation to unemployment theories does not * For the theory in full see Malthus, An Essay on the Principles of Population (London, 1803). ^Ibid., p. 53. Quoted, Seasonal Trades, p. 11. l6 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [i6 end here, however. In his Principles of Political Econo- my,^ is included the earliest, most complete and most sym- pathetic treatment of the question of the unemployed that is found anywhere in the works of the economists of this school. In attempting to explain the distress of the labor- ing classes after 1815, he contends it to be due to the fact that capital, revenue, and the effective demand for pro- duce had been diminished by the wars, while the work- ing population was in excess of the demand, because of the many births during the preceding period, and the return of soldiers and sailors from the wars. He recom- mends as a remedy the employing of the working classes in unproductive labor, or at least in labor the results of which would not go for sale into the markets. The build- ing of public works and the improvement of grounds and hiring of servants by the wealthy are advocated. Stat- ing that " nothing can compensate the laboring class for a fall in the demand for labor," that "fluctuations al- ways bring more evil than good to the working classes," he urges that it should be the object of government to maintain peace and an equable expenditure.^ The pas- sage is noteworthy not only for the striking change in spirit since the earlier work, but for the recognition of the evil effects on the laboring class of industrial fluctu- ations, and for the recommendation of methods for re- lieving the distress due to unemployment. : Malthus' treatment of overproduction is worthy of iiote because of the importance of that subject in later discussion. He argues the possibility of a real excess of goods over the quantity that could be consumed, though he does not show the possible connection be- tween overproduction and unemployment. ^ T. R. Malthus, Principles of Political Economy (Boston, 1821), p. 371 et seq. ^ Ibid., p. 403. 1 7] DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH UNEMPLOYMENT ly Through the works of David Ricardo there are scat- tered references to subjects that are today looked upon as important factors in unemployment, but Ricardo does not develop them as such. The Malthusian doctrine of population is accepted in full. The maintenance of the poor out of public funds is severely condemned, the Poor Law of the day, which richly deserved censure, being sharply attacked.' An increase in population is looked upon not necessarily as causing unemployment, but as lowering wages below the natural price until the num- ber of the poor is reduced by misery so that wages can again rise.* A question that has long been at is- sue is touched upon by Ricardo in discussing the effects of the introduction of machinery.^ He contends that the employment of machinery always leads to an in- crease in the net product of a country, but not neces- sarily to an increase in the gross product. As the power of employing labor depends on the latter, there very often results a diminution in the demand for labor, pop- ulation becomes redundant, and there is distress and poverty among the laboring class. Later economists took issue with Ricardo on this point. His general atti- tude on the question of relieving unemployment is shown where he endorses a statement that the great evil of the laborer's condition is poverty, resulting either from the scarcity of food or of work, but holds that the state should recognize the limitations of its power to remedy these conditions by legislation.'^ The same attitude is shown in another section where he argues that the dis- tress arising from a revulsion of trade is a necessary evil ^ David Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (London 1881), p. 58. ^Ibid.y p. 51. ^ Ibid., pp. 235-242. ^'Ibid., p. 58. (Footnote.) l8 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [ig to which a rich nation must submit.' This acceptance of the maladjustments of the industrial system and of the resulting misery as a necessary feature of that system is characteristic of the whole Manchester school. James Mill deals with none of the subjects connected with the problem of unemployment except in bringing forward the Malthusian theory of population in explain- ing wages. J. R. McCulloch, like his predecessors, attacks the Poor Law for its tendency to derange the natural relation between the supply of labor and the demand for it,=^ shows the connection between population and fluctua- tions in wage rates,^ and repeats verbatim Adam Smith's statements as to variations in wages due to irregularity of employment.'^ Of chief importance is his attempt to refute Ricardo's contention that the introduction of ma- chinery tends to reduce the demand for labor. McCul- loch holds that improvements in machinery may some- times force workmen to change their employments, but that they always increase the gross product, and therefore have no tendency to lessen the effective demand for labor.5 The works of Nassau Senior are notable for an appre- ciation of the problem of unemployment and a careful consideration of the causes of unemployment. In some of the points he makes he anticipates later thought. His disagreement with Adam Smith as to the distress occasioned by irregularity of employment, and his rather questionable conclusion as to the joys of that state of affairs have been noted. Of greater validity is his other reason- ^Ricardo, op. cit., p. i6i. 'J. R. McCulloch, Principles of Political Economy (Edinburgh, 1825), p. 355. ^Ibid., p. 344, et seq, *Ibid., pp. 240-1. ^Ibid., pp. 175-188. I^] DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH UNEMPLOYMENT ig ing on the subject. To the development of manufactures and the division of labor is ascribed the phenomenon of unemployment. ''Few principles are more clearly estab- lished," Senior writes/ "than that the productiveness of labor is in proportion to its subdivision, and that in pro- portion to that subdivision must be the occasional suf- fering from want of employment." Another point which Senior mentions is first made by him among the econo- mists ; that is, that unemployment is in part due to lack of mobility on the part of labor. "There can be no doubt that we have among our institutions and our habits much that fetters and misdirects the industry of our laborers ; and that these causes frequently occasion and always prolong the want of employment to which large portions of our laborers are frequently exposed." ^ A striking illustration of the position of the modern worker is given by Senior. The savage, like one of his own instruments, is clumsy and inefficient but a complete self-sufficing unit in himself. The civilized man, like a single wheel in one of his large machines, is marvelously efficient w^hen combined with others, but alone almost useless.3 In the works of the great " codifier " of the classical eco- nomists there is nothing new on the subject of unemploy- ment. John Stuart Mill accepts the Malthusian doctrine of population,'^ discussing it solely in its effect on wages, quotes Smith on the irregularity of employment as tending ^Nassau William Senior, Political Economy (London, 1872), p. 219. ^Ibid., p. 218. ^ Ibid., p. 219. It is significant, in connection with these theories of Senior, that he was one of the members of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws of 1834, the rigorous " Principles " of which still dom- inate English poor relief. *J. S. Mill, Principles of Political Ecpnomy (New York, 1864; from Sth London edition), p. 206. 20 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [20 to increase wages/ and follows McCulloch in denying Ricardo's contention that the conversion of circulating into fixed capital can injure the laboring classes in the aggregate, though admitting that temporary distress may result.'' J. E. Cairnes, in developing the theory of non-com- peting groups and in popularizing Senior's wage-fund doctrine, makes several points bearing upon the prob- lem. An increase in the amount of fixed capital at the expense of circulating capital will, at least for a time, have disastrous results in the development of pauperism, he contends, because of the curtailment of the wages fund involved in this change.^ However, such a cur- tailment will not be a permanent one, since *'. . . the true and only limit to the employment of labor is in- creasing cost of production. Increase the productive powers of industry, extend the knowledge of the indus- trial arts which support and comfort mankind, and there is little danger that laborers will ever fail of employment for want of work to do."^ Cairnes thus holds with Mill and McCulloch that distress due to the introduction of machinery will be merely temporary, involving a neces- sary change in the distribution of labor, but not a falling- of¥ in the total demand for labor. With Cairnes the line of immediate disciples of the Smith-Ricardo-Mill school of economists comes to an end. Their direct contributions to the study of the problem of unemployment were not many. The three outstanding ideas on the subject which they leave us are that unemployment is compensated by higher pay and *Mill, op. cit., pp. 473-4- ^ Ibid., pp. 130-6. '^J. E. Cairnes, Political Economy (New York, 1874), p. 179. ^Ibid., pp. 257-8. 21 ] DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH UNEMPLOYMENT 2 1 the Opportunities for idleness, that it is due to a surplus population, and that it is a necessary concomitant of in- dustrial changes, and therefore merely temporary in character. Their study of the problem was not inten- sive. Engaged as they were in building up a science of political economy it could hardly be expected that they should exhaustively study one phase of the subject. Prop- agating, moreover, the idea of free enterprise and laissez faire in industry, they were not likely to emphasize a point at which the doctrine of absolutely unrestricted business enterprise broke down, in so far as the well-being of the working classes was concerned. It was on these grounds, in part, that Bagehot and Jevons and Toynbee, who followed Cairnes, broke away from the restrictions of the classical school.' ^For a brief review of the attitude of the Manchester school toward the problem of unemployment, see a paper by Juliet S. Poyntz, included in Seasonal Trades by Webb and Freeman, (pp. 7-12). It is rather a severe criticism of the school from the standpoint of a Fabian Socialist than a fair review. W. M. Leiserson gives a good summary of the views of the early economists in an article in the Political Science Quarterly for March, 1916 (vol. xxxi, no. I, pp. 5-9). The views on the subject of unemployment of some of the lesser writers of the classical era, notably those of the Ricardian socialists, are worthy of exposition, but the scope of the present paper prohibits it. There is much that is suggestive of labor doctrines concerned with unemployment in the socialist writings of the nineteenth century, especially in the works of Karl Marx. Marx' analysis may be briefly summarized. With the advance of accumulation the proportion of constant (fixed) to variable (circulating) capital changes. If it was originally 1:1, it now becomes successively 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, 5:1, 7:1, etc., so that, as the capital increases, instead of 1-2 of its total value, only 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, \-%etc., is transformed into labor power. Since the demand for labor is deter- mined only by the variable constituent of capital, that demand falls progressively with the increase of the total capital. Capitalist accumu- lation, therefore, constantly produces a relatively redundant population of laborers— a surplus population. This surplus labor population forms 22 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [22 2. THE ABLE-BODIED UNDER THE ENGLISH POOR LAW While the problem of unemployment is one that must be approached from the standpoint of industry, rather than from the standpoint of the Poor Law or of charit- a disposable industrial reserve army. The course characteristic of modern industry, viz., a decennial cycle of periods of average activity, production at high pressure, crisis, and stagnation, depends on the constant formation, the greater or less absorption, and the reformation of the industrial reserve army, or surplus population. (In their turn the varying phases of the industrial cycle recruit the surplus population, and become one of the most energetic agents of its re-production). Moreover, on the possibiHty of throwing great masses of men suddenly on the decisive points without injury to the scale of production in other spheres, depends fluidity and transformability of capital. The whole form of the movement of modern industry depends, therefore, upon the constant transformation of a part of the laboring population into unem- ployed or half-employed hands. The over-work of the employed part of the working class swells the ranks of the reserve. Relative surplus- population is the pivot upon which the law of demand and supply of labor works. The relative surplus population exists in every possible form. Every laborer belongs to it during the time when he is only partially employed or wholly unemployed. There are, however, three general forms — the floating, the latent, and the stagnant. The floating surplus population is found in the centres of modern industry, among the laborers who, repelled and then attracted, are swayed by the expansions, contractions and shiftings of production. It is constantly augmented by the boys who were employed up to maturity and then turned out, for capitalistic production wants constantly larger numbers of youthful laborers, smaller numbers of adults. Of its members, also, are the thousands who are always out of work, even when there is a complaint of the want of hands, because the division of labor chains them to a particular branch of industry. The latent surplus population exists in the rural districts, where capitalistic production, having taken possession of agriculture, has forced out a part of the agricultural population. This excess is there- fore constantly on the point of passing over into an urban or man- ufacturing proletariat, and on the lookout for circumstances favorable to this transformation. The third category of the relative surplus pop- ulation, the stagnant, is that part of the active labor army which is characterized by extremely irregular employment, furnishing to capital an inexhaustible reservoir of disposable labor power. It recruits itself constantly from supernumerary forces of modern industry and agricul- 23] DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH UNEMPLOYMENT 23 able administration, it is yet necessary to understand the attitude which the Poor Law administrators have taken in order to view in the proper perspective modern theories and remedies. Previous to 1834 the Poor Law passed through three distinct periods, the division into periods being based upon the principles dictating Poor Law practice. From early times the poor have been divided into two classes, those unable to earn a livelihood, and the able-bodied, the "sturdy rogues and vagabonds." It was with the second of these classes that the Poor Law was first con- cerned, the "deserving poor" being left to churches, ture, and especially from those decaying branches of industry where handicraft 'is yielding to manufacture, manufacture to machinery. There is, finally, the lowest sediment of the relative surplus population, the "dangerous" classes, those dwelling in the sphere of pauperism. It is pauperism which is the hospital of the active labor-army and the dead weight of the industrial reserve-army. Das /Capital, chap, xxv, sections 3-4, (London, 1901), pp. 642-664. Marx anticipated in this analysis many of the later theories as to the causes of unemployment, as will develop in later discussion. The reasoning of the other socialists of the day was rather more sup- erficial than that of Marx, though tinged with the same intense revolu- tionary flame. The principle of the right to work was probably first enunciated in France by Fourier and Considerant. Upon it was based the scheme of employing in public works all who were out of work, which was attempted in 1848 (the ateliers nationaux). The matter of seasonal irregularity was first studied about the middle of the century by Louis Blanc, who gathered statistics from 1500 work-people in 830 workshops in Paris, as to their daily wage and the number of months during which each was out of work during the year. Very early in the nineteenth century Robert Owen in England was earnestly working to relieve the distress due to unemployment, proposing state provision of work as a protection against the misery resulting from industrial fluctuations. With the exception of the contribution made by Marx, the chief element in which was the conception of a mobile army as a necessity in capitalistic production, there is nothing of exceptional value to present study in the works of the early socialists. Cf. Seasonal Trades, pp. 11-16. 24 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [24 guilds, and private charity. Up to the Act of Elizabeth in 1601 extremely harsh laws for the suppression of vag- abondage were in force. Under the Acts of 1388 and 1405 gaol and stocks, with bread and water diet, were the mead of sturdy beggars.^ The Act of 1531 made necessary licenses for begging ; he who was caught with- out a license was " to be beaten with whips till his body be bloody by reason of such beating." Scholars of Ox- ford and Cambridge begging without authorization under the seal of their universities were to be punished in the same way. The years 1547 and 1572 marked even more severe penalties. Branding, the enslavement of wives and children, and death were some of the punishments for " loitering, idle wanderers." The extreme severity of these laws of course prevented their strict enforcement.'' The second of the early periods is that beginning with the Act of Elizabeth in 160 1. The dominant principles were, first, the relief of the lame, impotent, old, blind and other poor people not able to work, and, second, the setting to work of those having no ordinary or daily trade of life by which to get their living. Funds were to be provided by the practically compulsory taxation of every inhabitant. Every parish was solely responsible for its own poor. Laws of settlement were strictly en- forced under this act, to prevent the flocking of the poor to the parishes where they were best treated.^ Parish poor houses first came into being during this period ^Cf. T. Mackay, The English Poor (London, 1889), pp. 112-116. "^ Ibid., pp. 118-121. 'Such laws, however, were not originated at this time. Measures restricting the mobility of labor were enforced before the time of Wat Tyler during the reign of Richard II, and at varying intervals there- after. Cf. Mackay, op. cii., pp. 1 12-13. 25] DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH UNEMPLOYMENT 25 because of the need for a test to prevent promiscuous giving by local justices.^ In 1782, with the passage of Gilbert's Act, came the beginning of the form of poor-law relief to which Malthus and other of the early economists took such strong exception. The workhouse test was abandoned. All who were able and willing to work were to be pro- vided by the Poor Law Guardians with employment " suited to their capacity and near the place of their resi- dence.'' Moreover, they were " to be properly main- tained and provided for until such employment were secured," and the deficiencies of the earnings of such work, if not enough for maintenance, were to be made up to them. Striking evils ensued. Money and food were doled out liberally, often without a labor test. In one place an independent laborer, by hard work, could earn 12 shillings a week, while a pauper, for nominal work, received 16 shillings a week. In some places people were forced by law to employ and pay a number of laborers, the number being based upon the amount of their property."" The poor-rate assessment became very high with these heavy drains upon it. The evil effects of the system, in the degradation of the working classes, in the fostering of an inefficient laboring force, and in the encouragement it gave to an excessive growth of population have been widely advertised since the break- down of the old law.3 In 1834, following the Report of ^T. Mackay, Public Relief of the Poor (London, 1901). An interest- ing account of the economic background of the Act of Elizabeth is given on pp. 18-34. 'Instances taken from J. S. Nicholson, Principles of Political Eco- nomy (London, 1893), pp. 371-81. T/., Great Britain, Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Law, (London, 1834), pp. 77-98. An especial problem which developed during this period was that of 26 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [26 the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws appointed to investigate these conditions, the Act of 1834 was passed. The Report of the Commission of 1834 and the laws passed to carry out the principles therein embodied deal chiefly with the able-bodied, for the evils of the pre- ceding period had grown up primarily around the system for relieving this class. In considering the Report it is necessary to remember that it came as a reaction against the former system of allowances, and in an age when the doctrine of laissez faire dominated the economists and the statesmen. That the principles it put forward were excessively severe upon the individual pauper or unem- ployed man is therefore not surprising. The dominating principle of the Report is that which is known as *' less eligibility." **The first and most essential of all conditions is that his (/. / Intensive study of the problem of unemployment is a / ^ very recent development in the United States. Severe un- employment there was at various times during the latter half of the nineteenth century, and the problem of vagrancy has been virtually a permanent one since the Civil War. Though these conditions called forth nothing approaching a scientific analysis, the spectacle of large numbers of able- bodied men out of work during periods of industrial in- activity did cause brief flurries of excitement, characterized by generalizations of hobby-ridden individuals as to the causes of the phenomenon, and by appeals for immediate remedies essentially of a superficial character. The former constitute a considerable portion of the early American literature on the subject. A striking example of this early type of theory is the " Labor Exchange " idea, which was rather extensively circulated from 1890 to 1898. , Believing that iinemploy- ment and the like ills that beset the world were the result of the use of a metallic exchange medium which was scarce and hard to obtain, certain individuals formed a " National Labor Exchange " at Independence, Missouri, in 1890. It was designed to afford work for all by enabling everybody to exchange directly the things he produced for the things he n&eded. Labor, represented by a^paper currency,- was to 118 '^' - " [11^ 1 19] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY i ^9 _ bejhe medium of exchange. It was amiounced in 1897 that 300 branches with a total membership of 15,000 had been set up. The movement apparently died shortly afterward, however, for no trace of it appears after 1898.^ Similar in some respects is the conclusion reached by Hugo Bilgram, who asserts, after an involved argument, that business stagnation and involuntary idleness can be prevented by the issue of credit money." As early as 1871 Henry George was attacking land monopolization in California.^ In 1878, lecturing on Why Work is Scarce, Wages Low, and Labor Restless,^ he specifically named the monopoly of land as the cause of unemployment, and advocated the single tax as a method of relief. He takes occasion at the same time to deny that the influx of Chinese, to which unemployment was popu^ larly attributed, was the root cause of the lack of work. In Progress and Poverty,^ his theory is outlined at length. The Malthusian doctrine of a tendency toward a surplus population is repudiated,® George asserting that productive 1 Information concerning this interesting movement is contained in : The Labor Exchange Quarterly, July 1896, vol. i, no. i (Independence, 'Mo.) ; G. B. DeBernardi, Trials and Triumphs of Labor (Independ- ence, Mo., 1896) ; J. A. Kinghorn- Jones, How We May Dispose of Our Surplus Products and How We May Employ Our Surplus Labor (San Francisco, 1898) ; B. J. Sharp, Labor Exchange in a Nutshell (Salem, Oregon, 1897) ; E. Z. Ernst, The Progressive Handbook of the Labor Exchange (Olathe, Kansas, 1894). ' Hugo Bilgram, Involuntary Idleness (Philadelphia, 1889). Mr. Bil- gram's book is an elaboration of a paper presented to the American Economic Association. ' Henry George, Our Land and Land Policy, National and State (San Francisco, 1871). * Lecture delivered in Metropolitan Temple, S. R, March 26, 1878. Pamphlet printed for the Land Reform League. ' (San Francisco, 1879.) Ibid., bk. ii, " Population and Subsistence," pp. 81-136. I20 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [120 forces can keep pace with population. *'. . . in any given stage of civilization a greater number of people can produce a larger proportionate amount of wealth and more fully supply their wants than can a smaller number." ^ The single tax and the accompanying reforms which are to remedy the " unequal distribution of wealth based on the institution of private property in land " are fully explained in this later work. The second type of literature concerned with the problem of unemployment, previous to the introduction of the more intensive methods of study of recent years, is that coming from men personally in touch with the unemployed. On the purely descriptive side there is such work as Josiah /^ Flynt Willard's realistic narratives of American tramp life,^ and W. A. Wyckoff's portrayal of a winter among^ the unemployed of Chicago.^ More critical in their nature " are the contributions of those writing from the point of view of charity administration. John Graham Brooks gives us one of the earliest papers on the imemployed written from this standpoint.* He states frankly that he ". . . . cannot think it of prime importance to search for the causes of poverty and want of work," and confines his treatment largely to an exposition of the necessity of a change in the form of charity and a discussion of certain proposed methods of dealing with the unemployed. Four measures are suggested: emplo)mient bureaus, graded work tests, / trade schools for giving skill and capacity to the incom- \ petent, and compulsory farm colonies and work-shops. 1 Henry George, op. cit., p. 134. 2 Josiah Flynt, Tramping with Tramps (N. Y., 1901). »W. A. Wyckoff, The Workers— The West (N. Y., 1898), pp. 1-146. * Annals of the American Arademy of Political and Social Science, " The Future Problem of Charity and the Unemployed," July 1894, PP. 1-27. 121 ] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY ^ 12F Certain of these, it will be noted, are the remedies proposed today. But Brooks' analysis of the problem to be met, though he states that he is not searching for causes, is fun- damentally different from that of modern students. He is reasoning throughout from the individual, finding the cause essentially in the individual and in the individual' sj^tbiree J great passions — the sexual, gaming, and drink. "| This ap- pears unmistakably when he states that " This dead-beat crowd by any test that we apply to it is our greatest plague." ^ The point is emphasized here because it is char- acteristic of all the earlier approaches to the study of this question.* The same point of view is apparent in another early study, though a somewhat deeper analysis is made in this paper. J. J. McCook, speaking on *' The Tramp. i*i:Qb- lem^^ explains its development in this way: When an in- dustrial slump occurs, the young unmarried men, usually those a trifle irregular because of tendencies toward drink- \ ing, are first turned out by the employers. In seeking work. .^ elsewhere, a taste of wandering life is experienced. When times become better these men have become accustomed to the life of the vagrant and will not return to industry. Severe laws, which leave the fundamental problem un- touched, may scatter them but do not regenerate them. The remedies are to be found in the prohibition of heavy drinking, measures to prevent people from discovering that they can live without work, the passage and enforcement \ oi good laws, the " abolition of industrial booms, financial crises, business slumps, and hard times," the encouragement J 1 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, op. cit., p. 25. ^^ 2 Cf. supra, p. 22 et seq. " *'■"■ ^Proceedings of the National Conference on Charities and Correc- tions, Twenty-second Annual Session, 1895, pp. 288-301. ( 122 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [122 of marriage, the prevention of train- jumping, and the estab- lishment of reformatory institutions, " The man who does not desire to work, who prefers to eat his bread in the sweat of some other man's brow," is the subject of a paper by Washington Gladden, who so defines the " Workless Man." ^ An adequate work test is looked upon by Gladden as the essence of the correct rem- edy. Once having established this work test, four other measures are proposed: Workhouses are needed in the cities and farm colonies in the country ; training in the arts of industry should be included in early education; tem- porary employment for the industrial and capable among the unemployed should be provided by the state; breeding by paupers should be made impossible. Somewhat later in point of time and characterized by relief proposals somewhat broader in their scope, but with the same emphasis on individual fault, is Edward T. De- vine's analysis in Principles of Relief.^ Speaking of able- bodied men applying for assistance, he says : " Lack of employment, which, at the time of application, is given in the great majority of instances as the reason for being in need, is usually found, on inquiry, to be due to some per- sonal deficiency in the employee. He has been discharged for intemperance, for inefficiency, for inability to meet the demand upon him, or for some objectionable trait." * De- vine does state that in a certain proportion of instances the lack of employment is due to industrial causes, of which he enumerates ". . . the introduction of machinery, changes in methods of industry, a f alling-off in the demand for par- ticular commodities, disturbances of credit, and the . . . sub- ^ Z' 1 Washington Gladden, " What to Do with the W /^' ( ceedings of the National Conference on Charitie Workless Man," Pro- ties and Corrections, V.JTwenty-six Annual Session, 1899, pp. 141-152. '(N. Y., 1904.) ^Ibid., p. 151. 123] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY 123 " stitution of new management in a particular industry. . ." Five possible measures of assistance are mentioned by De- vine. They are the use of employment agencies and news- paper advertisements, direct appeal to possible employers of labor and co-operation with the trade union, the creation of industrial colonies or industries in which those who cannot be placed in regular employment may become self-support- ing, the use of temporary industries, such as woodyards, and the giving of duly safeguarded material relief.^ x\n- other measure, a varied manual training in youth, is men- tioned incidentally as a means for enabling workers to meet enforced industrial changes with less suffering. In considering Devine's reasoning and his recommenda- tions, as well as those of others engaged in charity work, the fact must be borne in mind that they are speaking, in the main, of a particular class of the unemployed, those who apply for relief at charity headquarters. Neverthe- less, a statement such as the following links up this analysis with those others in which the problem of unemployment is an individual problem. " The first principle to be recog- nized is that the obligation to find employment, like the obligation to continue suitable employment when one has it, rests primarily upon the applicant himself." " The works summarized above, which represent the opin- ions of the ablest of those connected with charity adminis- 1 Devine, op. cit., p. 161. ^Ibid., p. 152. Reference is made below to later works by Devine. A very obvious shift of emphasis from the individual to society and industry as basic sources of unemployment and vagrancy will be noted. Another study of vagrancy, comprehensive, but emphasizing individual faults essentially, and looking primarily to the taboo, to repressive legislation as the remedy, appears in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (May 1904), vol. xxxiii, no. 3, pp. 37-48. Benjamin €. Marsh, "Causes of Vagrancy and Methods of Eradication." 124 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [124. tration a decade or more ago, will serve to depict the gen- eral views of this class of workers. From them we turn to a brief review of work done in another field, that of theory/ 2. THE EARLY AMERICAN ECONOMISTS ON UNEMPLOYMENT The absence of an intensive analysis of unemployment which characterized the two types of writers mentioned above is also notable in the works of the early American economists. The Malthusian doctrine of a surplus popula- tion is a bone of controversy; the relation of the mobility and adaptability of labor to wages is considered ; the effect of the introduction of machinery on the number of men em- ployed is referred to; but unemployment as a distinct prob- lem is not studied. Certain points of value to the present study are made, however, by some of these earlier thinkers. The works of H. C. Carey contain a suggestive treatment of certain of the general factors involved in the problem being considered. Malthus' contention that population can outstrip the means of subsistence, and that unemploy- ment and misery are results of this tendency, is opposed on two different grounds. In the first place, man's productive powers are held to be indefinitely extensible with the devel- opment of civilization. " With every increase in the ex- tent to which matter has taken upon itself the form of man, there should consequently be found an increase of his power to guide and direct the forces provided for his use . . . and constant increase in his power to command the food and clothing required for his support." ^ Secondly, the re- ^ Note should be made of an additional piece of early material bear- ing on the subject of unemployment. The First Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of Labor (1886) on "Industrial Depres- sion " contains a recommendation for the restriction of immigration as a preventive of unemployment (pp. 271-3). ^ H. C. Carey, Principles of Social Science (Philadelphia, 1858-9), vol. i, p. 89. 125] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY lai^ productive power in man is not a constant quantity. There is a " self-supporting law of population " which " secures harmony in the growth of numbers and of food." Man's reproductive power "... diminishes as his various facul- ties are more and more stimulated into action — as employ- ments become diversified — as the societary action becomes more rapid — as land becomes divided — and as he himself becomes more free." ^ Another point made by Carey in his exposition of the essential harmonies of social life is that with the develop- ment of civilization the '* continuity of societary motion " increases. The " unceasing waste of labor," which is one of the conditions of early society and a scattered people, is replaced, with the growth of wealth and population, by an equal distribution of employment throughout the year.^ This thesis, which is of extreme importance to the question of unemployment, is elaborated at some length. The "asso- ciation of mankind," a "diversity of employments," a vari- ety of commodities produced, a growing complexity in the life of man and in the combinations among men, a " rapid- ity of circulation," all these are essential to the promotion of that continuity in the motion of society which is held to be the supreme test of civiHzation. And Carey believed that these harmonies were being worked out, that the early " gambling character of the labor of the fields " and all the other discontinuities which characterize a low stage of de- velopment were disappearing.^ In his American Political Economy* Francis Bowen sets 1 H. €. Carey, op. cit,, vol. iii, p. 308. Cf. vol. iii, chs. 46 and 47, pp. 263-327, for a full exposition of Carey's views on population. 2 Ibid., vol. iii, p. 28. ' For a development of this interesting theory at length, cf. Principles of Social Science, vol. ii, ch. 20, pp. 17-42; vol. iii, ch. 38-44, pp. 17-232. * (New York, 1890.) 126 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [126 forth, in the main, the stock statements of the classical economists on the questions concerned with unemplo5rment. Adam Smith's assertion that high wages compensate for irregularity of employment is repeated/ Senior's exposi- tion of the difficulty of the transfer of labor from one occupation to another, which is " the principal evil of a high state of civilization," is quoted.^ As to the effects of the introduction of machinery, Bowen sides with Ricardo's critics in asserting that ordinarily the ultimate demand, be- cause of the resultant cheapened production, will be suffi- cient to cause the absorption of all who are temporarily thrown out of work. If the demand for a commodity be limited by natural causes, however, " any improvement which will diminish the labor required for its production must permanently deprive some laborers of employment." * With Carey, Bowen repudiates the Malthusian theory of population. He sets forward " two great facts which afford a complete refutation of Malthusianism. The first is that the limit of population, in any country whatsoever, is not the nimiber of people which the soil of that country alone will supply with food, but the number which the sur- face of the whole earth is capable of feeding; and it is a matter of demonstration that this limit cannot even be approached for many centuries." * The second fact is that " the practical or actual limit to the growth of population, in every case, is the limit to the increase and distribution, not of food, but of wealth." ^ And that the increase of population is attended by a more than proportionate in- crease of wealth is held, for " every human being is an implement for the production of wealth.'* ^American Political Economy (New York, 1890), pp. 192-3. 2 Ibid., pp. 200-2. 8 Ibid., p. 54. * Ibid., p. 140. 5 Jbid., p. 140. 127] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY i^ _ Francis A. Walker in his treatment of wages de- velops a theory bearing immediately upon the subject of unemployment. The essential immobility and lack of adap- tability of labor, factors which prevent perfect competition for the product of industry, are emphasized in both his chief works/ Not only is labor narrowly restricted geo- graphically, but there is a marked slowness of occupational change. Caimes's theory of non-competing groups is en- dorsed, except in his contention that the children of the work classes constitute a ''disposable funds." Walker con- cludes that "... until you secure mobility of adult labor you will fail to find it in the rising generation." ^ In his contention that mobility, adaptability and guidance of the rising generation are needed. Walker is anticipating later proposals for the remedying of industrial disorganization.^ 3. METHODS OF PRACTICAL RELIEF The -summarized discussion of the theories of the three classes of thinkers considered above is intended to give an idea of the course of theoretical reasoning in the United States on the question of unemployment. The review of methods of practical relief need not be lengthy. The treatment of the able-bodied unemployed during the latter part of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth ran about the same general course as did English practice.* For homeless men, municipalities and associated charities sometimes provided lodging-houses with attached woodyards or other plants for the enforcement of » Francis A. Walker, Political Economy (N. Y., 1888) ; The Wages Question (N. Y., 1886). ^ The Wages Question, p. 203. ' C/. Political Economy, pp. 260-6; The Wages Question, "The Mo- bility of Labor," ch. 11, pp. 174-205. * Cf. supra, pp. 22-31. 128 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [128 the supremely necessary " work test." ^ The Salvation Army and the Volunteers of America have established similar institutions in the large cities, in some cases with a work test, in many cases, it is alleged, without such a test.^ At times, when public attention had been sharply called to the question by a severe winter, an acute industrial depres- sion, or the gathering of " armies " of the unemployed in the urban centers, funds were raised by public or private action and temporary employment given. Such temporary works usually bore the same sort of doubtful fruit as similar English works had done.^ Free employment bureaus con- ducted by philanthropic institutions, municipalities, and in some few instances by states, were established at various times and at various places for aiding the unemployed. The comparative lack of success of these earlier attempts was due to several causes, of which inefficiency, inadequate appropria- tions, lack of co-operation, and failure of all concerned to ^ A fairly comprehensive description of the treatment of the able- bodied by charitable institutions is contained in Charles R. Henderson^ Modern Methods of Charity (N. Y., 1904), especially pp. 395-6, 451-4, on vagrants. Cf. also Amos G. Warner, American Charities (N. Y., 1908), pp. 244-262, much more modern in its treatment. E. T. Devine, Principles of Relief, to v^'-hich reference has been made, contains mate- rial on this subject, cf. ch. iv, pp. 412-31, "Industrial Distress in New- York and Indianapolis, Winter of 1893-4." A similar discussion of winter relief is contained in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1894, PP- 61-81. Helena S. Dudley describes the relief work for women carried on in the Wells Memorial Institute at Boston. Descriptions of the more recent work of this character will be found in most of the current periodicals. ' Accounts of the work of the Salvation Army and of the Volunteers of America are given in : Monographs on American Social Economics, no. 20, " The Social Relief Work of the Salvation Army in the United States," by Commander Booth Tucker, 1900; Charles R. Henderson, Modern Methods of Charity (N. Y., 1904), PP. 433-38; United States Bureau of Labor, Bulletin No. 48 (September, 1903), "Farm Colonies of the Salvation Army." 3 Cf. supra, pp. 25 et seq. 129] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY 129 realize their true function are outstanding. Reference will be had to them later/ )Several farm colonies were created by voluntary agencies, and in {i 911 $10,000 was appro- priated in New York State for the establishment of an in- dustrial farm colony. But the public employment given was rare and brief; "Wayfarers Lodges" were compara- tively few, and patronized only in extremities of need by men out of work; the work of the early employment bureaus was virtually insignificant. The characteristic treatment has been to leave the men to their own devices, and to the police.j The distinction between men temporarily out of work and the chronic idlers, which was urged by Mr. Chamber- lain in England in the Circular of 1886 and which was attempted under the Unemployed Workman Act, has not been made in practice in the United States. It is approxi- mately correct to say that until quite recently the blanket terms for the unemployed of this country have been '' tramp " and " vagrant." And to a considerable extent is this still true of common parlance, for every migratory worker is a " tramp." It has been with the police, more than with any of the other agencies mentioned, that this class has had its dealings. The " need of co-operation with the police " in dealing with this class is emphasized by C. R. Henderson in Modern Methods of Charity. Tramp and vagrancy laws have applied practically indiscriminately to all who had " no visible means of support," workers and non-workers alike. A brief resume of these laws is there- fore pertinent to the present discussion. * For descriptions of the earlier offices, cf. Monographs on American Social Economics, no. 6, W. F. Willoughby, " Employment Bureaus," (Boston, 1900) ; Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor, 34th Annual Report (Boston, March, 1904), pt. ii, pp. 131-213, Free Em- ployment Offices in the United States and Foreign Countries; United States Bureau of Labor, Bulletin No. 68 (Jan., 1907) ; J. E. Connor, Free Public Employment Offices in the United States. 130 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [130 4. TRAMP AND VAGRANCY LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES ^ There are eighteen states " having tramp laws. In seven- teen of the states ^ the legislation covers persons begging from house to house and subsisting on charity; in nine* the laws apply to all persons " roaming about without vis- ible means of support " ; in five states ^ they apply to per- sons " wandering about without a fixed residence or lawful occupation " ; the laws of two states ® include persons rid- ing on trains without permission ; those of two states ' cover persons not making reasonable efforts to secure em- ployment ; while the law of one state ^ applies to persons lodging in places other than lodging-houses. No minimum sentence is prescribed by the laws of eleven states;® it is three days under the law of one state; ^^ thirty days in three states; ^^ six months in two states,^ and one year in one state. ^' * The material on tramp and vagrancy legislation included in this monograph has been obtained from charts compiled by W. C. Frank- hauser and Sidney D. Gamble, which constitute a digest of all such legislation prior to April i, 1915. Acknowledgment of indebtedness to them is due. 2 Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Mary- land, North Carolina, Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, Nebraska, Iowa, In- diana. 3 New HampshirCj Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Is- land, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, North Caro- lina, Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Maine. * Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York,. New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Iowa. ^ Maine, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Mississippi. •Vermont, Massachusetts. ' Nebraska, Iowa. ^ New York. * New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, North Carolina, Ohio, Mississippi, Iowa, Indiana. ^^ Nebraska. " Maine, New Jersey, Maryland. " Massachusetts, Alabama. " Rhode Island. 131 ] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY 131 A maximum sentence is not specified in one state ; ^ it is ten days in one state/ twenty days in one state,* thirty days in three states,* six months in three states,^ ten months in one state,® one year in four states,^ fifteen months in one state,® two years in one state, '^ and three years in two states/'' Thirteen states ^^ set no fines; one state ^^ prescribes a minimum fine of $3, while one ^^ sets a minimum fine of $50. A maximum fine of $20 is set by the laws of one state, ^* of $50 by two states,^*^ of $100 by one state,^* and of $200 by one state/ ^ The place of commitment is not noted in the laws of two states/® In one state ^^ commitment to the penitentiary at hard labor or to the state farm is provided for, while another ^^ gives the alternative of the penitentiary or jail. One ^^ prescribes the jail at hard labor, while two ^^ * Indiana. ' Iowa. ^ Nebraska. * North Carolina, Delaware, Mississippi. ^ Vermont, New York, New Jersey. * Maine, ■^ Connecticut, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Alabama. ® New Hampshire. ® Massachusetts. i'^ Rhode Island, Ohio. " Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Ohio, Iowa, Indiana. ^^ Nebraska. ^' Alabama. ^* Nebraska. ^^ Mississippi, North Carolina, ^^ Vermont. ^'^ Alabama. ^^ Nebraska, Indiana. 19 New York. '"Ohio. '1 Maine. *' Alabama, Iowa. 132 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [132 set the jail or hard labor. Three ^ fix the jail, three ^ the workhouse, while one ^ sets either the workhouse or the jail. One state * provides for sentence to the house of cor- rection, no labor being specified, while another ^ sets the house of correction at hard labor. Another state ^ gives three alternatives, the house of correction, the state farm or the workhouse. The law of one state ^ provides for no commitment whatsoever, stating that tramps shall be set to work on the streets or hired out. On the matter of pay there is again variance. Fourteen of the eighteen states having tramp laws allot no pay for work done by such offenders when imprisoned. Of those providing that tramps set to work shall be remunerated, one® fixes 33^^ cents a day, one^ $1.00 per day, one ^^ $1.50 per day, while one ^^ prescribes that a " fair wage " shall be paid. This sketch of the character of tramp laws is virtually duplicated as regards the almost complete lack of uniform- ity, the varying severity, and the absence of discrimination, by a description of vagrancy laws. Up to April i, 191 5, 44 stated y^ had definite vagrancy laws, those without such laws applying their tramp legislation to all classes of • N€w Hampshire, North Carolina, Mississippi. ' Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey. • Pennsylvania. * Maryland. ^ Vermont. • Massachusetts. "^ Delaware. ® Vermont. ' Nebraska. ^^ Iowa. " Delaware. " New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, Nebraska, Iowa, Virginia, West Virginia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Washington, Cahfornia^ Arizona, New Mex- ico, Idaho. 133] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY 133 vagrants. The applicability of these laws to the unem- ployed, especially to those of the migratory type, is shown by the fact that in 37 states ^ they apply to '' those who lack the means of support — who are able to work but re- fuse," in 17 states^ to ''persons lodging in places other than lodging-houses without permission," in 30 states ^ to " healthy beggars who solicit alms as a business," and in 2y states * to " suspicious persons strolling about without lawful business." While such definitions appear to exclude the legitimately unemployed, the fact that both the apparent, external line of cleavage and the actual line of cleavage between the vagrant, the tramp, and the industrial unem- ployed man cannot be clearly drawn has served to prevent such exclusion in actual practice. Sentences prescribed vary from a minimum of one day to six months, and from a maximum of ten days to three years, being sixty days or over in most of the states having such laws. Indeterminate sentences are provided for by ^ Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Maryland, North Carolina. Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, Nebraska, Iowa, Virginia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Michigan, Wis- consin, Indiana, Illinois, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Mis- souri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Washington, Cahfornia, Arizona, Utah. ' Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Maryland, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Louisiana, North Dakota, Montana, Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Washington, California, Arizona. ' Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Maryland, North Carolina, Alabama, Ohio, Mississippi, Nebraska, Iowa, Virginia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Minnesota, North Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Washington, California, Arizona. / : *.jbelaware. North Carolina, Alabama, Ohio, Nebraska, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illi- / nois, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, North Dakota, \ South Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Nevada, California, Arizona. - "' ^ 134 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [134 the laws of two states/ The place and character of com- mitment vary, as they do under the tramp laws, between penitentiary, jail and workhouse. The laws of fourteen states ^ provide specifically for outdoor labor on the streets, in some cases in chain gangs. That of one state * allows two days' credit on the prison term for each day's work. As has been noted, New York has established a state farm, to which vagrants as well as tramps may be sent for inde- terminate periods. Of the fourteen state laws prescribing outdoor labor, nine* provide for payment for such labor, the amount varying from 75 cents per day to $2.00 per day. In two states ^ one-half of the proceeds of their labor is given to the men at outside work. In the foregoing summaries no attempt has been made to give a compendium of the various tramp and vagrancy laws, nor to note the specific laws of particular states. They are meant to show the general type of treatment to which the " workless man " was often exposed, and to in- dicate the general theories lying back of these laws. The legitimacy of the application of this type of legislation to the criminal tramp and the worst type of vagrant is not here questioned, though there is room for doubt as to their effectiveness even in this field. The significant point is that to the ordinary peace officer and petty judge, as to the ordinary person, the unemployed man, especially if a migratory worker of the type very common in the * New York, Georgia ' Georgia, Illinois, Arkansas, North Dakota, Colorado, Nevada, Cali- fornia, Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, Kentucky, Wyoming, Iowa, Wash- ington. * Nevada. (J)Oh\o, Kentucky, Arkansas, Wyoming, Illinois, Colorado, California, Iowa, Washington. * Iowa, Washington. 135] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY 135 United States, has been a tramp or a vagrant. Dis- crimination was, and to a great extent still is, lacking in the treatment of these two classes. Laws such as that of Rhode Island, allowing $5.00 per conviction to peace offi- cers arresting tramps, intensify the evil effects of such lack of discrimination by putting premiums upon the arrest of homeless men. The "floating" policy, the forced moving-on of all non-residents, which has been characteristic of an- other type of police solution of the problem of the migra- tory man is in strict accord with, and is in fact an out- growth of, the theories inherent in this law making. This tramp and vagrancy legislation, this police control, has constituted perhaps a major part of the field of practice in the treatment of the unemployed. The above discussion of it, as a counterpart to the development of the types of theoretical reasoning touched upon, will help to show what has been the groundwork of the modern American theories concerned with unemployment and the unemployed man. Brief reference has been made to the earlier attempts to establish public employment bureaus in the United States.^ Later developments, notably in regard to action by the various states, have been far more promising, not only in that laws providing for such bureaus have been enacted, but in the comprehensive character of the employment-office systems thus established in certain of the states. At the present time ^ twenty-four states have laws providing for the organization of the labor market by means of central- ized state employment-agency systems.* In addition, one 1 Supra, p. 128. 2 April 1917. 'The states having such laws, with the years of their enactment, are as follows: Arkansas, 1917; California, 1915; Colorado, 1907; Connec- ticut, 1905; Illinois, 1915; Indiana, 1909; towa, 1915; Kansas, 1901; Kentucky, 1906; Maryland, 1916; Massachusetts, 1906; Michigan, 1905; 136 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [136 state ^ authorizes municipalities to set up public bureaus, another ^ encourages municipalities to take such action, and a third ^ requires them to do so. In the sphere of fed- eral action the attempt of the Division of Information of the United States Bureau of Immigration to provide ma- chinery for the same purpose is promising. This subject is briefly discussed below in connection with the immigra- tion question.* While these state systems are as yet inadequate, and although uniformity and full interstate co-operation have not as yet been achieved, the spread of the movement toward a more efficient distribution of labor marks the coming of a truer conception of the nature of the problem of unemployment. We have considered types of the men of one idea who attempted to solve the problem of unemployment. That anything of value to a solution of the problem was con- tributed by them is doubtful, though the force of Henry- George's thought is not yet spent. Wyckoff and Flynt, in- vestigators of reality, gave American society that closer and more intimate view of the " submerged tenth " which Charles Booth had given contemporary England. The charity administrators, the individual with all his faults bulking large in their view, tended to overlook the Minnesota, 1905; Missouri, 1899; Nebraska, 1897; New Jersey, 1915; New York, 1914; Ohio, 1890; Oklahoma, 1908; Pennsylvania, 1915; Rhode Island, 1908; South Dakota, 1913; West Virginia, 1901 ; Wis- consin, 1901. Thanks are due to Dr. John B. Andrews, secretary of tlie American Association for Labor Legislation, for the list of these laws. ^ Montana. ^ Louisiana. » Idaho. * Cf. infra, pp. 155, 156. Cf. also John R. Commons and John B. An- drews, Principles of Labor Legislation, "Federal Activity" (N. Y., 1916), pp. 276-8, 137] AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT THEORY 137 dominant industrial factors. Yet value their work has had, and the modern program for the prevention of unemploy- ment contains measures recommended years ago by men with this training. Similarly, though the American econo- mists did not isolate for separate study the problem being reviewed, and do not, of course, give us a complete analysis of the question as it is presented today, certain of the con- clusions they reached appear on that same program. From charity practice, public and voluntary, something has been learned. The place of police power in the treatment of the unemployed, the possibilities of repressive legislation, have been indicated by the outcome of such legislation. But a synthesis of methods and a concentration of attention on the specific problem of unemployment were needed for a more perfect analysis. A beginning in that study has been made. CHAPTER IV Contemporary American Theories of Unemployment AND OF Unemployment Relief I. general statement As a whole, the contributions made by American stu- dents to the study of unemployment lack the concreteness, the fullness, and the general applicability characteristic of four or five of the standard English works. There is no standard American work. There is no one authority con- taining a general description of conditions in the country as a whole, an analysis of such statistics and other infor- mation as we have, a full treatment of causes, a description of remedies and their applicability to the United States, and an outline of the all-important administrative ma- chinery needed.^ There are governmental commission reports touching the subject of unemployment. There are local reports by various state and city commissions, re- stricted in scope and with but a limited circulation. There are fragmentary statistics,^ published by federal and state bodies and by a few other groups, partially summarized by occasional individuals. Popular magazine articles and edi- torials innumerable have appeared within the last five years. The iniquities of the private employment-agency system and the necessity for public offices have been themes for a 1 A notable contribution in this last field is made in John R. Commons and John B. Andrews, Principles of Labor Legislation (N. Y., 1916), ch. ix, "Administration." 2 A note concerning American unemployment statistics is made at the end of this monograph. 138 C138 139] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 139 mass of writing. Other literature there has been on the tramp, the vagrant and the migratory worker, most of it characterized by a failure to link up these elements with the main problem. Industrial education, vocational train- ing and occupational guidance have received varying amounts of space, in some cases as phases of the unemploy- ment problem, more often as separate subjects. Land monopoly and immigration have been featured as causes of unemployment. Conventions have been held, and various of the more serious journals have given space to fairly comprehensive discussions of the problem. Finally, there has been propaganda designed to stimulate effective reme- dial work along correct lines. But, except in a very limited degree and in condensed form in certain of the reports, books, periodical articles and propaganda literature, there has been no synthesis of the subject, no full consideration by any one authority of the causes, conditions and possible remedies for unemployment as it faces the people of the United States today. To review in detail the various theories as to the causes of unemployment and the remedies for unemployment which appear in this variegated literature would constitute in large part a mere repetition of the first part of this paper which traced the various opinions held by English writers. The repetition would be not only one of form, but largely one of fact also. The analysis of the problem which has been sketched above has, in all its essentials, been accepted by American students of unemployment.^ Additional fac- 1 The first comprehensive account of the problem of unemployment to appear in the United States was the Report to the Legislature of the State of New York by the Commission Appointed . . . to inquire into the Matter of Employers' Liability and Other Matters, Third Report, Unemployment and Lack of Farm Labor (Albany, 1911). This report, largely the work of William M. Leiserson, appeared two years after the first edition of Wm. H, Beveridge*s classic, Unemployment — A I40 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [140 tors there are which enter into the situation as the United States faces it, and original work along certain lines has been and is being done in this country. But in its broad outlines the problem is the same and the analysis of it is the same. The study of the problem made by William M. Leiserson corresponds closely to the approach outlined in the first part of this paper. His first, and what is to date his full- est exposition of the question appears in the Report on Un- employment and Lack of Farm Labor, published in 191 1 by the New York Commission on Employers' Liability. Though the investigation was confined to New York State the findings have a wider bearing. The proposed remedies, being recommendations for immediate legislation, are nec- essarily more restricted than more general suggestions would be. They include a system of public employment offices, the publication of a labor-market bulletin, the occu- pational direction of juveniles, and the manipulation of public work so as to regularize employment opportunities.^ His latest contribution, an article on " The Problem of Unemployment Today," ^ though briefer, is wider in its scope and contains the results of more recent work. He con- tends that unemployment is not an insoluble problem, that Problem of Industry, and follows closely the lines laid down by Bev- eridge. (Note should be made of the treatment of the problem by the United States Industrial Commission, Final Report, 1902, pp. 74^3* Most of the factors at present held to account for unemployment are enumerated, but the omission of several of thoise fundamental in the analysis, and the failure to present the case with the logical clearness characterizing Leiserson's presentation of the situation in New York justify the statement that the latter was the first American analysis along acceptedly sound lines.) 1 N. Y. Commission on Employers' Liability, etc., Report on Unem- ployment and Lack of Farm Labor, pp. 65-9. ^Political Science Quarterly, March 1916 (vol. 31. no. i), pp. 1-24. 141 ] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 141 it is a result of maladjustment, that it is not personal but economic, that there is no over-population, no absolute^ surplus of labor, but a fluctuating industrial reserve force which is " only relatively superfluous." It follows from this that labor-saving machinery and improved processes cannot create a surplus labor force ; they merely make more difficult the problem of adjusting supply to demand. The imemployed man is therefore " an industrial factor, not a parasite upon industry." ". . . . to adjust these fluctua- tions, to distribute labor more evenly over the country, and in better proportions among the occupations, to equalize the amount of work among the seasons and the years," " to secure a more perfect adjustment of particular forms of labor to specific demands " — this is " the essence of the problem." ^ These ends are to be achieved by "a con- nected network of public employment bureaus," by guiding the entrance of children and immigrants into the labor market, through regularizing the labor demand by shifting necessary public work to periods of depression, by a de- casualization process, through " positive efforts of employ- ers to regularize employment," and by means of insurance against the " inevitable unemployment risk." * The United States Industrial Commission in its Final Report y printed in 1902,^ gives an analysis approximating present-day conclusions more closely than do other writings of that date. Personal, climatic and industrial causes are specified; immigration* is named as a cause contributing to the seasonal concentration of employment ; " the work- * Political Science Quarterly, op. cit., pp. 14-21. ^ Ibid., pp. 16-20. ' United States Industrial Commission, Final Report (vol. 19 of the Commission's Reports) (Washington, 1902), pp. 746-763. * Cf. infra, pp. 146-156, for a treatment of the relation of immigra- tion to unemployment. 142 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [142 man's ignorance of the labor market " is considered to be an important element in the situation. The remedying of this latter condition by the development of the labor-agency system is the only specific recommendation made on this subject/ The most pretentious of the publications of individuals on the question is Frances A. Kellor's Out of Work — A Study of Unemployment.^ A revision of an earlier work ^ concerned primarily with the evils of the private employ- ment agency system, the later book is designed to describe the present unemployment situation and the remedial meas- ures which have been undertaken or proposed. A broad field is covered, and a considerable body of information concerning conditions, attempted remedies, and the details of various programs for the future is set forth without a marked degree of organization. A great part of the book is devoted to a discussion of the organization of the labor market. The diagnosis by Miss Kellor is virtually that of the English students and need not be detailed. The book is referred to later in connection with the treatment of sev- eral peculiarly American problems. Approaching the subject from the field of insurance I. M. Rubinow analyzes the problem in the same way, em- phasizing the same general factors.'* As to a solution, Rubinow believes that the only remedy is to be found through an averaging of wages, and that this can only be done by means of " compulsory, subsidized unemployment insurance." ^ ^ United States Industrial Commission, Final Report, pp. 757-61. 2 (New York, 1915.) • » F. A. Kellor, Out of Work (New York, 1905). ^ I. M. Rubinow, Social Insurance (New York, 1913), ch. 26, "The Problem of Unemployment," pp. 441-455. 5 Ibid., pp. 455-79. Rubinow's discussion of unemployment-insurance systems is a valuable addition to the material on that subject 143] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 143 Isaac A. Hourwich ^ points to the same causes of sea- sonal and cyclical variations, absence of mobility, and the_ building-up of labor reserves. The contention that unem- polyment is the result of over-population is classed by Hour- wich as fallacious. The United States Commission on Industrial Relations ^ gives " two basic causes of unemployment — unjust distri- bution of income and land monopolization," and additional minor causes corresponding to those which have been named. The former causes are mentioned above. ^ Em- phasis has been placed throughout by Leiserson and others of the Commission staff who worked on unemploy- ment, upon the necessity of organizing the labor market,* which, as we have seen, is Beveridge's key to the solution of the problem. To detail the findings of other bodies as to the general causes of unemployment and the general methods of relief would entail mere repetition. The Report of the Chicago Municipal Markets Commission,^ the Report of the Mayor's Commission on Unemployment (Chicago),^ the report to ^ Isaac A. Hourwich, Immigration and Labor (N. Y., 1912), pp. 114- 125. ' United States Commission on Industrial Relations, Final Report (Washington, 1915), pp. 33-38, 156-182, 255-275. 3 Pp. 119, 120. * United States Commission on Industrial Relations, Final Report, pp. 170-182. Cf. also: United States Commission on Industrial Rela- tions, Tentative Proposals for Consideration on the Question of Public and Private Employment OfUces (Washington, 1914) ; United States Commission on Industrial Relations, First Annual Report (Washing- ton, 1914), pp. 55-57. ^Report to the Mayor and the Aldermen by the Chicago Municipal Markets Commission on A Practical Plan for Relieving Destitution and Unemployment in the City of Chicago (Chicago, 1914). 6 (Chicago, 1914.) 144 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [144 the Commonwealth Club of California on Unemployment ,^ the Report on Unemployment by the Commission of Im- migration and Housing of California,^ the Forty-sixth An- nual Report on the Statistics of Labor of Massachusetts ^ fix the same broad causes, with certain additional points of emphasis to be noted later, and propose the same basic methods of relief. Henry R. Seager,* Edward T. Devine, in his later works,^ John R. Commons,^ Charles R. Hen- derson '^ agree on the essentials of the same analysis. Scott Nearing * and Jacob Hollander ^ have voiced the cry that remedial maladjustment is the cause of unemploy- ment. Alice Solenberger/^ in her study of homeless wan- derers, sensed the basic industrial fault lying at the root of the human problem she tried to solve. Notable, also, have been the series of articles appearing in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and ^ Transactions of the Commonwealth Club of California (vol. 9, no. 13 )» Unemployment (San Francisco, 1914). ^ Commission of Immigration and Housing of California, Report on Unemployment (Supplement to First Annual Report) (Sacramento, 1914). ' (Boston, 1915), pt. ii, pp. 24-31. * Henry R. Seager, Social Insurance (New York, 1910), pp. 84-114. Cf. also Seager's letter to Devine in Report on the Desirability of Establishing an Employment Bureau in the City of New York (New- York, 1909), pp. 86-89. ^Misery and its Causes (New York, 1913), pp. 11-14, 1 15-146; Report on tJie Desirability of Establishing an Employment Bureau in the City of New York. ^ Labor and Administration (New York, 1913), pp. 358-381. ^Report of the Mayor's Commission on Unemployment (Chicago, 1914). Cf. also "The Struggle Against Unemployment," American Labor Legislation Review, May 1914 (vol. iv, no. 2), pp. 294-299. ^Social Adjustment (New York, 1911), pp. 266-284; Social Religion (New York, 1913), PP- 124-137, 211. • The Abolition of Poverty (New York, 1914). ^^ One Thousand Homeless Men (New York, 1911). 145] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 145 Social Science. Various of their issues ^ have dealt with phases of the unemployment problem, and material of ex-^ ceptional value on the subject has been contributed. Out- standing in the contemporary field of practical work toward a solution of the pressing question of unemployment have been the American Association for Labor Legislation and its subsidiary body, the American Section of the Inter- national Association on Unemployment. Under the aus- pices of these organizations two national conferences on unemployment have been held, intensive investigations prosecuted, a national survey of methods of unemployment relief conducted, and propaganda looking toward an intel- ligent meeting of the problem carried on.^ The character of the relief measures detailed in their propaganda litera- ture — the establishment of public employment exchanges by means of which entrants to industry may be guided, seasonal industries dovetailed, and casual labor decasual- ized; the systematic distribution of public work; the reg- ularization of industry by employers, workers and con- sumers ; unemployment insurance — indicate how closely the analysis of unemployment made by these bodies corres- ponds to that outlined in the first part of this monograph. Apart, however, from the main factors in the situation, which are considered to be universally the same, there are 1 Cf. especially: vol. ZZ, no. i, January 1909, " Industrial Education"; vol. 2)3, no. 2, March 1909, "Labor and Wages"; vol. 59, May 1915, "The American Industrial Opportunity," pp. 104-21 1; vol. 61, Septera- l>er 19 1 5, "America's Interests after the European War." ^ The " Proceedings of the First National Conference on Unemploy- ment" appear in The American Labor Legislation Review, May 1914 (vol. iv, no. 2). The "Proceedings of the Second National Confer- ence on Unemployment," together with reports of investigators, are in The American Labor Legislation Review, June 1915 (vol. v, no. 2). The "Unemployment Survey" is in The American Labor Legislation Review, November 1915 (vol. v, no. 3). 146 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [146 certain conditions peculiar to the American problem of un- employment. Two of these, the problem of immigration and that of the migratory element, are important factors in the situation in the United States. The outstanding fea- tures of each of these problems in their relation to unem- ployment will be briefly considered. 2. THE RELATION OF IMMIGRATION TO UNEMPLOYMENT The flood of immigration to the United States has been increasing annually in volume beyond all precedents of similar population movements in the world's history. Dur- ing the year ending June 30th, 1914,^ 1,218,480 immigrant aliens were admitted to the United States. During the twenty-year period from 1895 to 19 14, 14,750,738 immi- grants came to this country. Previous to the year 1896 the proportion of immigrants coming from northern and west- ern Europe far exceeded that from southern and eastern Europe. The tide changed in that year, the number of Italians, Poles, Hebrews, Greeks, Russians and others of the latter group swelling enormously with each passing year. During the decade from 1901 to 19 10, 21.8% of the total number of immigrants were from northern and west- ern Europe, while 71.9% came from southern and eastern Europe. The character of the recent immigrants is indi- cated also by the occupational division. Of the 1,214,480 immigrants for the year ending June 30th, 1914, 14,601 were of the professional class, 173,208 of the skilled classes, 320,215 professed no occupation, while 658,869 were vir- * Since the beginning of the European War, immigration has, of course, fallen far below this figure. What the course of future immi- gration will be is an unsettled question. The statistical data are from the reports of the Commissioner General of Immigration and from the Statistical 'Review of Immigration compiled by the United States Im- migration Commission (vol. iii of that Commission's Reports), 147] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES i^y tually unskilled, though a considerable part of these are classed as farm laborers/ This influx has given rise to many new problems, and to the intensification of many old ones. Its effect on the labor market is apparently so obvious that for years it has been maintained by many persons that immigration is the basic cause of unemployment. That it is at least an important contributing factor is the opinion of the United States Im- migration Commission, an opinion submitted on the basis of a most comprehensive survey of the general question of immigration. " Their (the recent immigrant population) numbers are so great," concludes the Commission, " and the influx is so continuous that even with the remarkable expansion of industry during the past few years there has been created an over-supply of unskilled labor, and in some of the industries this is reflected in a curtailed number of working days, and a consequent yearly income among the unskilled workers which is very much less than is indicated by the daily wage rates paid." " This " over-supply of un- skilled labor in the industries of the country as a whole " is held to be " a condition which demands legislation re- stricting the further admission of such unskilled labor." The same conclusion is reached by the Commission's inves- tigators of immigrants in industries.^ " The entrance into the operating forces of American industries of . . . large numbers of wage-earners of the races of Southern and Eastern Europe . . . has led to the voluntary or involun- tary displacement from certain occupations and industries of the native American and older immigrant employees." * * An additional 51,587 are put in a miscellaneous group. ' United States Immigration Commission, Reports (Washington, 1911), vol. i, p. 39. ' W. Jett Lauck was the expert in charge of these field investigations, and the conclusions represent his findings, in part. * United States Immigration Commission, Reports, vol. i, pp. 500-1. 148 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [148 The restrictive measures suggested by the Commission are seven in number, the three most important being " the exclusion of those unable to read or write in some lan- guage," " the limitation of the number of each arriving each year to a certain percentage of the average of that arriving during a given period of years," and " the exclu- sion of unskilled laborers unaccompanied by wives or fami- lies." ^ An earlier government investigational commission, the United States Industrial Commission, formed a similar opinion. ". . . the general conclusion is inevitable that while a moderate flow of immigration may be assimilated without depressing effects, a rapid influx of immigrants with low standards of living, crowding into the cities and into the less skilled occupations, creates an unfair compe- tition with those already here, intensifies the effects of other depressing causes, and weakens the organization of the working people, by which they hope materially to improve their earnings." ^ In still another phase of the unemploy- ment situation, the Commission contends, does immigration serve to accentuate the problem. The evil of excessive seasonal concentration of production in a short, busy season is held to be made possible by " the over-supply of un- organized labor and the necessity under which the em- ployees exist of working more hours when they find em- ployment in order to compensate for the period of idleness." " It is mainly the presence of a large supply of immigrant workpeople and their willingness to work more hours that make it possible to concentrate production " in the trades marked by that practice.^ * United States Immigration Commission, Reports, vol. i, p. 47. "^ United States Industrial Commission, Final Report (vol. 19 of com- plete report, Washington, 1902), p. 969. »/&fd., p. 751. 149] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 149 *' Agriculturalizing the immigrant " is not looked upon b}^ the Industrial Commission as a final solution of the- problem, though of value when combined with other meas- ures/ Various restrictive measures designed to raise the bars higher and so keep out some of the surplus are suggested.^ Jeremiah Jenks and W. Jett Lauck ^ favor a like restric- tive program. Though this policy is based upon other reasons than a belief in a superfluity of labor, it is to be noted that among their conclusions it is stated that " the point of complete saturation has already been reached in the employment of recent immigrants in mining and manu- facturing establishments." * The authors are very definitely in favor of restriction, holding such a policy to be a neces- sary first step toward ameliorating the present conditions of industrial affairs, under which " not only the economic welfare of the American wage-earner but the maintenance of our political and social institutions are threatened." ^ The American Federation of Labor has consistently ad- vocated restriction of immigration, basing its attitude in part on the point being considered here — that immigration is a direct cause of unemployment. Its policy is expressed in a statement submitted to the United States Immigration Commission ^ by Samuel Gompers, president of the Fed- eration. One of the exhibits in the statement, an article by John Mitchell, states '' That there is an inseparable relation betw^een unemployment and immigration is demonstrated by all the statistics which are available upon the subject." ^ ^ United States Industrial Commission, op. cit., pp. 971-977. ' Ibid., pp. 995-1014. ^ The Immigration Problem (New York, 1913). * Ibid., p. 210. * Ibid., p. 213. * United States Immigration Commission, Reports, vol. 41, pp. 369-431. ' Ibid., p. 374. That the " glutting of the labor market through im- I^o CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [150 The opinion that immigration is a cause of unemploy- ment, and that therefore restriction is necessary, is quite commonly held. The New York Commission on Employ- ers' Liability reports : " The large and continuous additions to the laboring population of the State due to immigration are among the most important single causes of unemploy- ment. Immigration, no doubt, accounts in part for the chronic over-supply of labor revealed by the statistical evi- dence we have presented." ^ Prescott F. Hall similarly holds that " The displacement of large numbers of native workers by foreigners who underbid them affects the stand- ard of living, not only by direct competition but by increas- ing the ranks of the unemployed." ' They who contend that immigration is a cause of un- employment do not hold the field alone, however. Isaac A. Hqurwich is the staunchest defender of the view that the solution of unemployment is to be found by reforming other conditions, not by checking the incoming alien. Hour- wich first develops the orthodox explanation of unemploy- migration" is merely temporary and that the consequent over-supply of labor in the large cities is temporary, is asserted by Mitchell in an earlier publication. The evils of even this temporary glut are strongly emphasized, however. Organized Labor (Philadelphia, 1903), p. 182. John R. Commons, Races and Immigrants in America (New York, 1911), pp. 115-116, quotes some interesting resolutions adopted by the General Executive Board of the United Garment Workers of America, which consists with one exception of iRussian Jews. The resolutions allege that the labor market has been overstocked so that the workers of this country are seriously menaced. Congress is called upon to completely suspend immigration for a term of years, and other drastic measures are urged. ^ Report to the Legislature of the State of New York by the Com- mission appointed to Inquire into the Question of Employers' Liability and Other Matters, Third Report, Unemployment and Lack of Farm Labor (Albany, 1911), pp. 7-8. ^Immigration (New York, 1913), p. 135. 151 ] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 151 ment, accounting for the glutting of the labor market by Beveridge's " labor reserve " argument/ He next pro-~ ceeds to refute the argument that this " normal glutting " might be aggravated by immigration. If underbidding by the cheaper alien forces the native out of work, the per- centage of unemployment should be higher among the natives in the industries in which they both work, alleges Hourwich. Statistics from the Report of the United States Immigration Commission are quoted to disprove this argu- ment.^ Furthermore, the ratio of unemployment is least in the states having the largest proportion of immigrant wage-earners, greatest in those where the proportion of im- migrants is lowest. Immigration and unemployment statis- tics are next compared over a period of years, Hourwich at- tempting to show by these figures that with increasing immi- gration unemployment decreases, and with declining immi- gration unemployment increases.^ This is explained by the fact that " unemployment and immigration are the effects of economic forces working in opposite directions; that which produces business expansion reduces unemployment and attracts immigration, that which produces business de- pression increases unemployment and reduces immigra- tion." * It is merely a case of economic supply and de- mand, says Hourwich in another article; '^ there may be fluctuations, but in the long run the supply of immigrants will adjust itself to the demand. Holding it as proved that unemployment is not the result of over-population, Hour- wich contends that it necessarily follows that " the limita- ^Immigration and Labor (New York, 1912), pp. 114-125. ^Ibid., pp. 126-128. ^Ibid., pp. 137-139. * Ibid., p. 145. ^Political Science Quarterly, December 191 1, "The Economic As- pects of Immigration" (vol. xxvi, no. 4), pp. 615-42. 1^2 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [i^^ tion of the number of wage-earners can promise no relief against unemployment." ^ Not quite so emphatic in their arguments are others who do not admit immigration as a cause of unemployment. Helen L. Sumner, holding that ". . . these cycles (of pros- perity and depression) have a greater influence than can be attributed to the competition of alien labor," ^ considers the case against immigration to be unproved. Frances Kel- ler takes the same attitude. ". . . we do not know whether our reserve of immigrant labor is larger than the country should carry or not." ^ The most recent statement of the " present-day analysis of unemployment " is that of Leiserson.* It is held here to be definitely established that there is "no absolute overplus of labor," that, though ports of entry for immigrants and certain occupations may be over-supplied with labor, there are always other parts of the country and other occupations capable of using more labor than they have. Leiserson, therefore, sides with those who look beyond immigration for the fundamental causes of unemployment.** ^ Immigration and Labor, p. 146. '^ Adams and Sumner, Labor Problems (New York, 1905), p. 87. ^ Out of Work, p. 147. * Political Science Quarterly, March 1916, " The Problem of Unem- ployment Today," vol. xxxi, no. i, pp. 1-24. ^Ibid., pp. 12-14. The Surplus Labor Theory of Unemployment Mention of the theory that unemployment is due to a real surplus of labor has been made at various points in the preceding analysis. It was not taken up at length because virtually discarded by the leading English students. A brief statement of the development and present status of the theory in England is relevant at this point, however, for it has a bearing upon the question of the relation of immigration to unemployment. Malthusianism was in its essence a theory that over-population was the cause of destitution. (C/. supra, pp. 15 et seq.) The tendency of 153] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 153 One other phase of the immigration question, in its re- lation to unemployment, should be noted. The necessity of~ the distribution of immigrants upon their arrival, of their population to increase faster than the power of production was believed to be the cause of unemployment, pauperism, and all the accompanying misery. How Ricardo completely reversed this theory that the power of production was outstripped by population, in contending that a sur- plus of labor might result from increased power of production, is aptly pointed out by William AI. Leiserson (in the above-mentioned article, pp. 7-8). For Ricardo claimed that the introduction of machinery and improved processes resulted in the permanent displacement of labor. {Cf. supra, pp. 17 et seq.) ''Thus," says Leiserson, "the doctrine that labor is superfluous because population grows faster than production becomes a doctrine that increased productive power creates a surplus of labor." The same theory of a superfluity of labor is inherent in poor-law procedure prior to 1834. The practice of community support of the able-bodied out of the rates was based largely upon the belief that such a surplus existed. (Cf. Report of Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1909, pt. vi, ch. 9, sec. 442.) The Royal Commission of 1834, as has been noted above (pp. 26 et seq.), repudiated this theory, and based their recommendations upon the doctrine of personal responsibility for unemployment. The idea that there are more workers than work did not die, how- ever. It has appeared constantly in popular discussion, and has been voiced at various times by students of the problem. The London County Council expressed it in a rather tentative form in 1903. " If it is a fact that there does not exist sufficient work in the country to afford employment for the whole population, that circumstance alone appears to warrant a consideration as to whether the reduction of the hours of labor to a reasonable limit, in the interests of industry and labor alike, is not a matter of the highest importance." (Quoted, Brassey-Chapman, Work and Wages, London, 1908, vol. ii, Wages and Employment, p. 352.) The Webbs speak of the " surplus of labor power which already exists in the partial idleness of huge reserves of under-employed men" (Minority Report, pt. ii, p. 268), and state that ". . . there exists in the United Kingdom today no inconsiderable sur- plus of labor." They qualify their assertions, however, by admitting that this is not a surplus made up of workmen who could not, with an im.proved organization of industry, be productively employed. The surplus of which they are seeking to dispose is not a real superfluity of labor, therefore. The most emphatic statement that there is a real surplus is made by 154 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [154 industrial and regional guidance, is emphasized by those who argue for increased restriction. The congestion of immigrants in certain occupations and in certain cities is Norman B. Dearie (Industrial Training, London, 1914). His theory of a " Defective Demand " (i. e. one not sufficient to engross the total supply of labor) has been referred to (supra, p. 50). It is true, he says, that ". . . under existing methods of employment the whole supply is required for some purpose or other. But there is more than enough of it (labor) to permit the free use of the more irregular and wasteful methods of employment, and to provide for the growth of large re- serves of labor, both of men and boys" (p. 437). Were it not for this superfluity of labor, Dearie contends, the present vicious waste of juve- nile and adult labor in faulty methods of industrial training, "bhnd alleys," and in unnecessarily large labor reserves, could never go on. That they exist is proof of the existence of a surplus (pp. 436-452). Arguments contradictory to this theory of an excessive number of workers are advanced by most of the writers on unemployment. Thus, Herbert Samuel, in denying the theory that England is over-populated, stated: ". . . . those who hold this view forget that, other factors being constant, the development of a country's natural resources and its foreign trade increases with the growth of its population and diminishes with its fall, that a small population may mean a smaller production and not a greater regularity of employment, and, conversely, that an increase of population may not involve an addition to the ranks of the unemployed." (Reservation of Herbert Samuel in the Report of Agricultural Settlements in British Colonies, 1906, p. 24. Quoted by Stanley C. Johnson, A History of Emigration from the United King- dom to North America, 1 763-1912, London, 1913, pp. 304-5.) Rowntree and Lasker assert that **. . . it is clear that the absorption of a perma- nent surplus of efficient, even though unskilled labor cannot be an in- soluble problem unless there is a shortage of one or both the other two factors in the production of wealth, vis., land and capital. As there is no such shortage in England today, it must be possible for statesman- ship to bring unemployed labor into union with unemployed land and capital, and so absorb any surplus which might result from decasual- ization." (Unemployment, London, 191 1, pp. 141-2.) Beveridge goes into a somewhat more detailed argument to prove that "unemployment cannot be attributed to any general want of ad- justment between the growth of the supply of labor and the growth of the demand." (Unemployment, London, 1912, p. 11.) The orthodox economic arguments are brought forward to show that not only is there a general dependence of the supply of population upon demand, but a 155] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 155 probably the greatest obstacle to their assimilation, as well as the chief cause of their alleged intensification of the" problem of unemployment. It is again merely the question of labor-market organization, of adjusting supply to de- mand, geographically and occupationally. Especially is this occupational or qualitative maladjustment due to the influx of immigrants to be noted. For the question of industrial training as a means of providing a labor force qualitatively adapted to the industrial needs of the country is peculiarly pertinent to the immigration situation. The need of an agency for the geographical distribution of immigrants has long been felt. The Immigration Act of February 20, 1907, provided for the establishment of a division of information designed " to promote a beneficial distribution of aliens admitted into the United States among the several States and Territories desiring immigration." ^ For this purpose the division is to " gather from all available sources useful information regarding the resources, products, and physical characteristics of each State and Territory, and shall pub- lish such information in different languages, and distribute the publications among all admitted aliens." The work has been carried on with a fair degree of success, especially in the direction of immigrants to agricultural positions.^ In more immediate dependence of the demand upon the supply (p. 5). Secondly, Beveridge shows that there are not too many men in Eng- land for the available land, the. depopulation of the rural districts proving the fact. That the wealth of the country and the productivity per head of the population continue to increase is further proof that there is no over-population, for that would mean that the law of dimin- ishing returns had come to apply to labor generally. Finally, the rising reward to labor, the fact that its price is rising nominally and relatively, is held to show conclusively that there is no superabundance of labor and no tendency for labor to become of decreasing importance as a factor in production (pp. 8-10). 1 Immigration Act of February 20, 1907, section 40. ' For details of the workings of the Division of Information, includ- 1 56 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLO YMENT [ 1 56 19 14, in response to a widespread feeling that a national system of labor exchanges was needed, the Division of In- formation of the Bureau of Immigration attempted to widen the scope of its work by the establishment of a nation-wide system of placement bureaus, post-offices throughout the country being utilized as offices. The at- tem.pt was rather unfortunate, there being no adequate preparations made, a trained staff being lacking, and the post-offices being unfitted for such work/ This question of the distribution of immigrants has re- ceived considerable attention in the literature on immigra- tion, and, as well, in that on unemployment. The Immi- grants in America Review^ has featured it, Frances Kellor ^ has emphasized it, Peter Roberts * and Frederic Haskin ^ devote space to it. The disorganization of our immigrant labor market and the chaotic conditions prevailing in this one industrial field have been brought sharply home to the United States. Fortunately, the attack on disorganization here appears to be leading to a campaign against the more important maladjustments prevailing over the whole field of labor placement.^ ing statistics of distribution, see the Reports of the Chief of the Divi- sion, appearing in the Annual Reports of the Commissioner General of Immigration. ^ A " conference on employment " for the furtherance of this plan was held at San Francisco in August 1915, under the auspices of the United States Department of Labor. A report of the proceedings ap- pears in the Monthly Review of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, October 1915 (vol. i, no. 4). - Cf. especially The Immigrants in America Review for March 1915 (vol. i, no. i). * Out of Work, pp. 1 10-148. * The New Immigration (New York, 1912), pp. 63-66. ^ The Immigrant (New York, 1913), pp. 92-99. * Cf. also in connection with immigrant distribution : New York, 157] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 157 3. THE FLOATING LABORER A second element in the unemployment situation whicKT is found in an exceptionally aggravated form in the United States is the problem of the floating laborer. Its magnitude and importance, and something of its fundamental nature are just beginning to be understood. The United States Commission on Industrial Relations reports : " There are large numbers of American workers, in all probability sev- eral; millions,^Who are not definitely attached either to any particular locality or to any line of industry." ^ Samuel Gompers, president of the American Federation of Labor, stated to that body : " The lot of the migratory laborer in the United States today is in some points worse than slav- ery. . . . The very large proportion of unskilled or casual workers who at the present time usually find employment only on short jobs or at seasonal work suffer a precarious existence. As they move from place to place they often go hungry, and while at work their food is usually of a poor quality, ill prepared. . . . The character of much of the work performed in the United States does not permit of steady employment of a regular body of men. ... In all, it is difficult to estimate how many men are thus living in the United States today, but the number reaches into the ^nmior^' ^ First Annual Report of the Bureau of Industries and Immigration, igii (Albany, 1912), pp. 33-42; New York, Report of the Commission of Immigration (Albany, 1909), pp. 109-128. United States Bureau of Labor, Italian, Slavic and Hungarian Unskilled Immigrant Laborers in the United States, Bulletin No. 72 (Washington, September 1907), pp. 403-486; Massachusetts, Report of the Commission on Immigration (Boston, 1914), pp. 37-53. * United States Commission on Industrial Relations, Final Report (Washington, 1915), p. 156. ' Quoted, Fifteenth Biennial Report of the Bureau of Labor Statis- tics of California, 1911-1912 (iSacramento, 1912), pp. 49-50. J 158 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [158 This problem of the migratory worker — a problem aris- ing out of the seasonal character of the nation's industries and the country's wide geographical extent — is closely in- terwoven with the allied questions of the tramp and vagrant. In the first place, the line of cleavage between these classes at any one time cannot be clearly drawn. The tramp and the vagrant work at times ; conversely the migratory worker is likely to beg or steal at times. Numerous classifications, however, have been made, all with a doubtful degree of precision. lAlice Solenberger ^ divides " tramps " into those wandering continuously, those wandering only at par- ticular times or seasons, and those wandering periodically with long intervals of regular life between. Edmond Kelly makes four divisions : youths under twenty-one who tramp for amusement; able-bodied workers and misdemeanants; neuropaths; the non-able-bodied.^ i These classifications, I One Thousand Homeless Men (New York, i^liX^pp. 209-238. * The Elimination of the Tramp (New Yorl^ iQoSJi pp. 9-1 1. Kelly includies in an appendix (pp. 103-107) several' other classifications. Picturesque, and at the same time having a great element of truth, is that of Dr. Reitman, who is himself a tramp : f (i) Tramp. (o) Dreams and wanders. (b) Trampdom — Main lines of railroads. (c) Runaway boy. Vagrants or penniless wanderers. Every species is itself subclassified according to (a) Character, (b) Geographical distribution, ic) Type. Tramp criminal. Criminal tramp. Neuropathic tramp. (2) HOBO. (a) Works and wanders. (b) Hoboland — farms, ice- houses, section houses, mines, etc. (c) Non-employed. (3) Bum. (a) Drinks and wanders. (&) Bumville — barrel-houses and saloons. (c) Drunkard. Tramp hobo. Train hobo. Bum hobo. Criminal hobo. Neuropathic hobo. Criminal bum. Neuropathic bum. 159] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES 159 made by persons in whose work the tramp proper has bulked large, tend to minimize the very large proportion oi wandering workers proper. In a second way is the problem of the migratory laborer interlocked with those of the tramp and vagrant. For the path downwards is easy to travel, and a large number of the best type of laborer have gone over it. The Indus- trial Relations Commission traces their course, r Young men, full of ambition and high hopes for the future, start their life as workers, but, meeting fajlure after failure in establishing themselves jn„ some tra,de . gr ^^^^c^^^ their am- bitions and hopes go to pieces, and they gradually sink into the ranks of the migratory and casual workers. Continuing their existence in these ranks, they begin to lose self- respect and beQome ' hoboes.' Afterwards, acquiring cer- tain negative habits, as those of drinking or begging, and losing all self-control, self-respect, and desire to work, they become ' down-and-outs ' — tramps, bums, vagabonds, gam- blers, pickpockets, yeggmen, and other petty criminals-:- in short, public parasites, the number of whom seems to be growing faster than the general population." ^ Though this picture is somewhat overdrawn, the tendency to sink is undoubtedly ever present in the life of the migratory worker. The strongest, perhaps, of the forces serving to push the migratory laborer down into the ranks of the non-workers, to increase the irregularity of his working periods, and thus to intensify the normal problem of unemployment, has been the condition of the camps in which this class of C* ynited States Commission on Industrial Relations, Final Repor^^ "^157. Will Irwin has sketched this descent graphically, basing his articles on the findings of Peter A. Speak, who covered the field of migratory labor for the Industrial Relations Commission. Cf. "The Floating Laborer," Saturday Evening Post, May 9, June 6, July 4, 1914. l6o CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [i6o worker has been housed. The flare-up at Wheatland in August, 191 3, first drew the attention of CaHfomia to the character of these camps/ The resulting investigation throughout the state disclosed intolerably filthy and in- sanitary conditions in a large percentage of such quarters.^ Nor has California been alone in this regard. Leiserson, as superintendent of the Wisconsin public employment offices, attributed in part to camp conditions the fact that men re- fused to take work offered them.^ Conditions similar to those in California are noted in New York,* and in the Middle- West. ^ The relation of these conditions to irregu- larity of employment seems to be directly proved by statis- tical evidence, for the labor " turnover " varies roughly throughout California in accordance with the character of the living quarters provided in the different seasonal occu- pations. A " turnover " of 100 per cent (complete replace- ment of the labor force) in a two-week period is not un- common in certain of the railroad and lumber camps of the state ; in exceptional cases the period has been even briefer.® Cf. Carkton H. Parker, "The Wheatland 'Riot," in The Survey, <5 W V^arch 21, 1914 (vol. 31, no. 25), pp. 768-770. 2 For statistics on this SHbject, cf. The First Annual Report of the Commission of Immigration and Housing of California (Sacramento, 1915). ^American Labor Legislation Review, Feb. 1913 (vol. iii, no. i), p. 132- ^Report of the Commission of Immigration of the. State of New York (Albany, 1909), pp. 126-128. ^ Chicago, Report of the Mayor's Commission on Unemployment, pp. 69-72. For further descriptions of the working conditions of the migra- tory laborers, cf. Frances A. Kellor, Out of Work, chapter on *' Immi- gration and Unemployment," passim; Peter Roberts, The New Immi- gration, pp. 66-69. * Cf. Carleton- H. Parker, " The California Casual and His Revolt," Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1915 (vol. 30> no. i), pp. 1 19-122. h VMa l6i] CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN THEORIES i6i fVVith. dirty qiiarters, hard work,,, poor food, and long hours \ to contend with, it is not to be wondered that the descent j ~& into shiftlessness, vagrancy, and crime is so easy. | ""The mode of treatment of migratory persons has been indicated above in the consideration of the tramp and vagrancy legislation of the various states. Beyond this re- pressive type of relief no comprehensive attempt to deal with the various types of migratory wanderers and with the underlying industrial causes has been made. Certain states have started the cleaning-up of their labor camps; New York State has established a farm colony for the purpose of regenerating the fallen ones of this class; the scattered public employment offices represent a commencement of the task of organizing and directing the movements of labor. But those who have studied the situation look to deeper- going measures for a possible solution of the various prob- lems involved. In addition to making recommendations for a national system of labor exchanges, and an intelligent distribution of public work, the Federal Industrial Rela- tions Commission proposes that cheap transportation be pro- vided, that the stealing of rides be eliminated, that cheap workingmen's hotels be established, and that state and fed- eral farm colonies be provided for the rehabilitation of these men.^ Alice Solenberger details a set of institutions, including compulsory farm colonies, for the treatment of the degenerate in these classes.* The case for compulsory farm colonies is put most strongly by Edmond Kelly,^ who devotes his entire book to the explanation of that type of solution. Kelly, it must be noted, is concerned primarily with the tramp, the " won't work," and does not attempt to deal with the deeper economic factors. ^ Final Report, pp. 159-160. ' One Thousand Homeless Men, pp. 235-236. ^ The Elimination of the Tramp (New York, 1908). l62 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [162 The problem of the migratory worker and the migratory vagrant, important as it is in the American situation, has not as yet been adequately studied. A conception of its im- portance is dawning upon social thinkers. The survey has yet to be made which will point the way to a definite attack and a definite solution. CHAPTER V Conclusion Through all the diverse opinions ^ as to the causes of unemployment and as to what should be done to remedy the situation, the central theme of industrial disorganiza- tion runs. '^ . . . The nineteenth century," two students of an allied problem state, ** left the twentieth an unenviable legacy — the legacy of an industrial system which had grown up without forethought, and whose maladies had been treated with spasmodic doses of medicine, administered in ^ Space and' time limitations have made it necessary to merely men- tion certain of the less orthodox and less widely accepted theories of unemployment. From the contention of the extreme individualist that **. . . it is the imperfect development of competition, broadly con- ceived, in relation to the intricate economic circumstances with which it has to cope, that accounts for proficient people being without occu- pation" (S. J. Chapman, in Brassey-Chapman, Work and Wages, vol. ii, "Wages and Employment," pp. 349-350) to the attitude of the socialist who looks upon unemployment as " co-extensive with the capi- talist system "(John Spargo, " Sociahsm as a Cure for Unemployment," in Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 191S, vol. 59, pp. 157-64) diverse theories run a wide course. The forty-year-old theory of Henry George and the more recent one of the Federal Industrial Relations Commission agree in placing land monopolization as a cause. The unjust distribution of income has been put forward as a basic reason. Politics, the sweating system, the pre- vailing wage system, sun spots, the tariff, convict labor, the minimum wage, child labor, the entrance of women into industry, "big busi- ness " — all have been pilloried as responsible for unemployment. Pos- sibly all have a connection, more or less remote, with the problem being considered, but the inclusion of a discussion of them in the present paper has been impossible. 163] 163 1 64 CONTEMPORARY THEORIES OF UNEMPLOYMENT [164 a spirit of hopeful experiment rather than with any pro- found study of the needs of the system." ^ The necessary study of that disorganized condition is in process of being made. For complete knowledge of all the factors in the unem- ployment problem further investigation is needed. But the time when investigation should occupy the whole field is past. William Leiserson ^ has made an emphatic appeal for the next step — for action, for the carrying through of a program for the prevention of unemployment, for the out- lining of the necessary laws, for the devising of the needed administrative machinery. The path of remedial action is not yet entirely clear, but it has at least been blazed. Con- structive work, for which investigation has sufficiently paved the way, is the present need. * Dunlap and Denman, English Apprenticeship and Child Labor (London, 1912),- p. 309. *"The Problem of Unemployment Today," Political Science Quar^ terly, March 1916, pp. 23-4. APPENDIX I AMERICAN STATISTICS ON UNEMPLOYMENT (These references do not include publications later than the early- part of 1916, nor are they intended to be at all exhaustive for the period previous to that date. They are designed to suggest the general character of American statistics on unemployment, rather than to con- stitute a complete statement of all such statistics existing.) The earliest figures available on this subject are those gath- ered by the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor in June and November, 1878, and published in the Tenth Annual Report of that Bureau. (Boston, January 1879, pp. 3-13.) Far more intensive in their nature are those compiled in con- nection with the Massachusetts censuses of 1885 and 1895. The former were published in the Eighteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor (Boston, December 1887, pp. 1-294), the latter in the Massachusetts State Census of 1895. The 34th Annual Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor (Boston, March 1904, part ii, pp. 131-213) con- tains some data on the amount of unemployment at that time. The Annual Reports of the Chief of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor, from 1908 on, give figures as to the amount of un- employment among organized wage-earners. Statistics showing the amount of unemployment among members of trade unions in New York State have been pub- lished since 1897. In 1897 and 1898 these were published in the Annual Reports of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of that state. From 1899 to 19 13 they appeared quarterly in the Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Since September 19 1 3, a special series of Bulletins on Unemployment have been issued, while more recently the issue of monthly Labor Market Bulletins has been begun. Though restricted in their scope to organized workers, they are valuable as indices to seasonal 165] 16s 1 66 APPENDIX I [1 66 and cyclical fluctuations and other business changes. Though a compilation of individual causes of unemployment, such as lack of work, lack of material, weather, labor disputes, dis- ability, etc., is included, no investigation of the more funda- mental causes is attempted. The Report to the Legislature of the State of Neiu York by the Commission Appointed . . . to Inquire into the Question of Employers' Liability and Other Matters — Third Report — Unemployment and Lack of Farm Labor (Albany, 191 1, pp. 28-38) contains a summary of previous statistics on unem- ployment in New York State, together with additional mate- rial gathered by the Commission. The United States Census workers gathered data on un- employment in 1880, but lack of funds and doubt as to their reliability prevented their compilation. The census of 1890 contains some material on the question. That of 1900 (volume on Occupations) deals at length with unemployment, but a warning as to the uncertain character of the findings is given. Similar data were gathered in 1910, but have not as yet been published. The Bulletin on Manufactures published by the United States Census contains general statistics of the number em- ployed by months. The Census of Manufactures of 1905 has information as to the numbers employed in all manufacturing industries in 1904, by months. The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics has done some work in this field, and is at present publishing valuable data. The i8th Annual Report of the United States Com- missioner of Labor (1903) details the amount of unemploy- ment among 25,440 families; the material for this report was gathered during the years 1900-2. Of their later publications the following are valuable on this subject: Bulletin No. 10 (Miscellaneous Series No. i, on Statistics of Unemployment and the Work of Employment OMces in the United States. Previous statistics from various sources are summarized. 167] APPENDIX I 167 Bulletin No. 116 (Women in Industry Series No. i). Hours, Earnings and Duration of Employment in Selected Industries in the District of Columbia. Bulletin No. iiq (Women in Industry Series No. 2). Working Hours of Women in the Pea Canneries of Wis- consin. Bulletin No. 146 (Wages and Hours of Labor Series No. 8). Wages and Regularity of Employment in the Dress and Waist Industry of New York City. Bulletin No. 14/ (Wages and Hours of Labor Series No. 9). Wages and Regularity of Employment in the Cloak, Suit, and Skirt Industry. (In New York City and Boston.) Bulletin No. 1^2 (Miscellaneous Series No. 10). Unem- ployment in New York City. Bulletin No. 182 (Women in Industry Series No. 8). Un- employment among Women in Department and Other Retail Stores in Boston, Mass. Bulletin No. 183 (Miscellaneous Series No. 12). Regular- ity of Employment in the Women's Ready-to-W ear Garment Industries. The Monthly Reviews which the Bureau has published since July 191 5, give scattering statistics on unemployment. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has been conducting in- vestigations on the "turn-over," concerned with the average term of employment, which will give statistical evidence in a field of unemployment largely untouched as yet. The Annual Reports of the United States Geographical Survey state the number of work days and idle days in the coal-mining industry in the United States. Similar information for the mines of the state of Illinois has been included in the annual Illinois Coal Report. Various of the state bureaus of labor statistics publish data as to the number employed by months in the different manu- facturing industries, and other scattered material touching on the problem. Reports of varying scope are published by the public em- ployment offices, state and municipal. I68 APPENDIX I [1 68 The Monthly Labor Market Bulletin issued by the super- intendent of the state employment offices of Wisconsin gives a valuable summary of general conditions in that state. The American Federationist, the official organ of the Amer- ican Federation of Labor, published data concerning the amount of unemployment among organized workers, from 1899 to 1909. The number unemployed each month, and the maximum and minimum numbers unemployed each year were given. Publication of this information was discontinued in 1909 because of doubts as to its value. A census of the unemployed was made in Rhode Island in 1908, covering the urban districts. The information gathered appeared in the 22nd Report of Industrial Statistics, Rhode Island, 1908. Figures on unemployment in Chicago are contained in two documents: The Report of the Mayor's Commission on Un- employment, Chicago, March 1914; Report of the Mayor and Aldermen by the Chicago Municipal Markets Commission on a Practical Plan for Relieving Destitution and Unemploy- ment in the City of Chicago. Chicago, December 28th, 1914. Some statistics on conditions in Portland, and in the rest of Oregon, are given in the Reed College Record, December 1914, No. 18, ^ Study of the Unemployed, by Arthur Evans Wood. Of value as showing seasonal fluctuations in a particular industry is the Special Report of the Bureau of Labor Statis- tics of California on Labor Conditions in the Canning Indus- try (Sacramento, 1913). Statistical analyses of the irregularity of female employ- ment in various industries are included in an article by Irene Osgood Andrews, " The Relation of Irregular Employment to the Living Wage for Women," which appeared in The American Labor Legislation Review for June 191 5 (vol. v, no. 2), pp. 291-418. Data indicating the percentage of unemployment among wage-earners in fifteen cities of the United States during 191 5 are given in an article by Royal Meeker, " Some Recent 169] APPENDIX I 169 Surveys of Unemployment," in Annals of the American Acad- emy of Political and Social Sciences, September 191 5 (voT. 61), pp. 24-9. Scott Nearing gives a resume of some of the earlier statis- tics in '' The Extent of Unemployment in the United States" — Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Associa- tion, September 1909 (vol. ii, new series, no. 87), pp. 525-49. The sources of unemployment statistics in the United States are indicated in a paper read by W. M. Leiserson be- fore the International Conference on Unemployment. Cf, Compte Rendu de la Conference Internationale de Chomage (Paris, 191 1 ), vol. 2, rapport no. 15, "The Fight Against Unemployment in the United States." APPENDIX II REFERENCES (a) Early English Theories and Poor Law Practice Cairnes, J. E. Political Economy. New York, Harper & Brothers, 1874. Dunlop, O. J. The Farm Labourer. London, Fisher Unwin, 1913. Great Britain. Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, Report. 1834. . Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress. London, Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1909. Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress. London, 19 10. Appendices, vols. 19, 19a, 19b. Leiserson, William M. " The Problem of Unemployment Today." Po- litical Science Quarterly, March 1916 (vol. 31, no. i). McCulloch, J. R. Principles of Political Economy. Edinburgh, 1825. Mackay, T. The English Poor. London, Murray, 1889. . Public Relief of the Poor. London, Murray, 190 1. Malthus, T. R. An Essay on the Principles of Population. London, 1803. . Principles of Political Economy. Boston, Wells & Lilly, 1821. Mill, John S. Principles of Political Economy. New York, 1864. (From fifth London edition.) Nicholson, J. S. Principles of Political Economy. London, Macmil- lan, 1893. Poyntz, Juliet S. " Introduction " to Seasonal Trades, Webb and Free- man. London, Constable, 1912. Ricardo, David. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Lon- don, i88i. Senior, Nassau W. Political Economy. London, 1872 (6th ed.). Smith, Adam. Wealth of Nations. Webb, iSidney and Beatrice. The Break-up of the Poor Law. Part I of the Minority Report of the Poor Law Commission. London, Longmans, 1909. . English Poor Law Policy. London, Longmans, 1909. . The Public Organization of the Labor Market. Part II of the Minority Report of the Poor Law Commission. London, Long- mans, 1909. 170 [173 I7l] APPENDIX 11 171 (b) Current English Theories _^ Alden, Percy. The Unemployed. London, King, 1905. Association internationale pour la Lutte contre le Chomage. Revue Internationale du Chomage. Paris, 1911, 1912, 1913. Beveridge, W. H. Unemployment — A Problem of Industry. London, Longmans, 1912. Booth, Charles. Life and Labour of the People in London. First Series, " Poverty." London, 1892-3. Second Series, " Industry." London, 1895- 1903. . Old Age Pensions and the Aged Poor. London, Macmillan, 1899. Bowley, A. L. " Wages and the Mobility of Labor." Economic Jour- nal. London, March 1912. Pp. 46-52. Casson, William A. Old Age Pension Act, 1908. London, Knight, 190S. Chapman, Sidney J., and Brassey, Lord. Work and Wages. Part II, Wages and Employment. 'London, Longmans, 1908. Chapman, Sidney J., and Hallsworth, H. M. Unemployment in Lan- cashire. (Publications of the University of Lancashire, Economic Series, no. 12.) Manchester, 1909. Charity Organization Society. Report and Minutes of Evidence of Special Committee on Unskilled Labor. London, Charity Organ- ization Society, June 1908. Dawson, W. H. The Vagrancy Problem, London, King, 1910. Dearie, N. B. Industrial Training. London, King, 1914. Drage, Geoffrey. The Unemployed. London, Macmillan, 1894. Dunlop, O. J. The Farm Laborer. London, Fisher Unwin, 1913. Dunlop, O. J., and Denman, Richard B. English Apprenticeship and Child Labor. London, Fisher Unwin, 1912. Encyclopedia Brittanica. Eleventh edition, vol. 27, pp. 578-80. George, David Lloyd. The People's Insurance. London, Hodder and Stoughton, 191 1. Gibbon, I. G. Unemployment Insurance: A Study of Schemes of As- sisted Insurance. London, King, 191 1. Great Britain, Boar