U. C. L. A. 
 EDUC. DEPT, 
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 LOS ANGELES
 
 Studies in the History of 
 Educational Opinion from 
 the Renaissance
 
 SonOon: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, 
 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, 
 
 AYE MARIA LANE. 
 lasfloto: 50, WELLINGTON STREET. 
 
 ltip>ig: F. A. BROCKHAUS. 
 
 THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. 
 Bombag anU Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD. 
 
 \_All Rights
 
 Studies in the History of 
 
 Educational Opinion from 
 
 the Renaissance 
 
 By 
 
 S. S. LAURIE, A.M., LL.D. 
 
 Professor of the Institutes and 
 History of Education, University of Edinburgh. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE : 
 
 at the University Press. 
 
 1903 
 
 U. C. 1. A. 
 EDUC. DEPT,
 
 PRINTED BY J. AND C. F. CLAY, 
 AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
 
 Education 
 
 1! P I A Libm * 
 
 U, U L, f\. / 
 
 EDUC. DEPL 
 
 PREFATORY NOTE. 
 
 I VENTURE to issue these Lectures in the conviction that 
 the study of the History of Education in the writings of the 
 most distinguished representatives of various schools of thought 
 
 * 
 
 is an important part of the general preparation of those who 
 adopt the profession of Schoolmaster. To present a general 
 historical outline of opinion I have found in practice to be 
 uninstructive as compared with an analytic exposition of the 
 doctrines of eminent writers themselves. At the same time, 
 the leading characteristics of the historical development have 
 to be indicated. 
 
 To deal with the whole question of education during the 
 period of transition from the scholastic philosophy and 
 monastic and cathedral schools down to these times or even 
 to 1600, which may be regarded as the beginning of the 
 Modern period, is beyond my power. And even if I had the 
 necessary learning, I doubt if by so doing I would serve the 
 purpose I have in view so well as by selecting representative 
 
 827733
 
 VI PREFATORY NOTE 
 
 men and interesting students of education in their methods. 
 For my purpose is the education of those who mean to 
 devote their lives to education. 
 
 The student, who adds to a study of this volume the 
 accounts of Rousseau, Pestalozzi and Froebel in Quick's 
 Educational Biographies and some good exposition of Herbart, 
 will have a very fair acquaintance with the main lines of 
 educational opinion since the Renaissance. 
 
 I would apologise for the large space I give to Locke, 
 did I not think that his Thoughts read along with his Conduct 
 of the Understanding is, spite of some obvious faults, the 
 best treatise on education which has ever appeared with the 
 (doubtful) exception of Quintilian. 
 
 S. S. L. 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, 
 December 1902. 
 
 NOTE. Four of the sixteen chapters of this volume have appeared 
 in books now for some time out of print.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER PAGE 
 
 I. The Renaissance, 1320-1600 3 
 
 II. The Renaissance and the School First Period 
 
 (1320-1450). Vittorino da Feltre, 1378-1446 . 18 
 
 III. The Second Period of the Renaissance (1450-1600). 
 
 Trotzendorf; Sturm ; Neander .... 24 
 
 IV. Universities 31 
 
 V. " The Governour," by Sir Thomas Elyot ; ? 1490-1546 38 
 
 VI. Rabelais : Monk, Physician, Cure 1 of Meudon. 
 
 I483(?)-I553. Note on Erasmus; 1466-1536 
 
 (P- 55) 46 
 
 VII. Roger Ascham, the Humanist; 1515-1568 . . 58 
 VIII. The Jesuits. Order founded 1534 .... 86 
 
 IX. Montaigne, the French Rationalist, 1533-1592 . . 94 
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, FROM 1600 A.D. 
 
 X. Francis Bacon, 1561-1626 119 
 
 XI. Comenius, the Sense-Encyclopaedist and Founder 
 
 of Method; 1592-1671 138 
 
 XII. John Milton, the Classical Encyclopaedist ; 1608- 
 
 1674 159 
 
 XIII. John Locke, the English Rationalist ; 1632-1704 . 181 
 
 XIV. John Locke continued 208 
 
 XV. John Locke concluded. " The Conduct of the 
 
 Understanding" 222 
 
 XVI. Herbert Spencer, the modern Sense-Realist . . 235
 
 THE RENAISSANCE AND THE 
 SCHOOL."
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, 13201600. 
 
 First Period, 1320 1450. 
 Second Period, 1450 1600. 
 
 THE Renaissance, or the Revival of Letters, is the name by 
 which we distinguish the period which saw the revolt of the 
 intellect of Europe against Mediaevalism in all its forms, 
 political, ecclesiastical, philosophical, and literary. It has 
 correctly enough been called a ' Humanistic ' revival ; but 
 the word ' Humanistic,' if it is to be a true designation, must 
 be interpreted broadly and not confined to the revived interest 
 in Litterae Humaniores. 
 
 The revival, indeed, was inevitable from the day on which 
 the intellect of Europe had built for itself a house to live in, 
 and put on the roof, and made fast the doors. Thought on 
 moral and religious questions had on certain lines exhausted 
 itself and been rounded off, after having been organized into a 
 system, provided with administrators and guarded by penalties. 
 Of the Church Secular, the Church Monastic, and of Civil 
 Polity this is true. Nay, of the Universities, presumed to be 
 the centres of a living intellectual activity the mind of 
 Europe it was also substantially true, from 1200 A.D. till the 
 time of Descartes. The great organizing intellect of the Middle
 
 4 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-I6OO 
 
 Ages was St Thomas Aquinas, who died in 1272. The disputa- 
 tions, which gave zest to Academic life for centuries before and 
 after St Thomas, contained, many of them, grave issues ; but 
 they were all within certain recognized authoritative lines. And 
 even where they raised questions that might have called forth 
 answers fatal to the prevalent theological system, these were 
 often discussed as matters purely intellectual, which, however 
 they might be settled in the dialectical arena, could not disturb 
 the dogmas of Faith. Even after the Revival was in full swing, 
 doctors had, not seldom, one opinion for philosophic schools, 
 another for the Church and the world outside. They were 
 scarcely honest, as we now count honesty ; but intellectual 
 honesty is in these days a cheap virtue ; and yet, spite of this, 
 a good many think it even now too dear at the price to be paid 
 for it. 
 
 The House which mediaeval faith, scholastic philosophy 
 and ecclesiastical administrative genius had built for itself, 
 was, because of its very completeness, a prison. Perhaps it 
 may safely be said that there is no possible organized system 
 of thought and life, which could sustain for long its despotism 
 over the mind of the higher races of men. Reason is in its 
 essence free, and will always react against uniformity of 
 opinion and custom. It is a disruptive force. The laying of 
 the last stone of a temple is the beginning of its decay. 
 
 At the same time let us note this fact, that had it not been 
 for the freedom of discussion inevitably connected with the 
 mediaeval Universities from the nth century onwards, the 
 mind of Europe would not have been prepared for any new 
 advance. The scholastic disputations and the revival of 
 Hellenic abstract thought, while they gave form and stability 
 to Catholic doctrine, yet stirred a speculative spirit which went 
 far beyond the limits which the Church would have prescribed. 
 We see this spirit operating as early as Abelard. The Hellenic 
 literature and attitude to life was the great intellectual foe of 
 the Church in the early centuries of the Christian era : again
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-l6oO 5 
 
 it intruded itself, and the conflict had to be renewed and is 
 still progressing. It is, at bottom, a struggle between Naturalism 
 in the broad Hellenic sense of that term and Supernaturalism. 
 The former, while necessarily unstable, lends itself to progress ; 
 the latter is, as authoritative, stable, and suspicious of all move- 
 ment. 
 
 But there were other precursors of the Renaissance. The 
 Crusades had disturbed the mind of Europe and brought 
 nations into contact with each other. Above all, they had 
 brought the more thoughtful and inquiring minds into touch 
 with Byzantine and Arabic learning, which was itself in the 
 direct line of Hellenic tradition. Secondly, the general rise of 
 nationalities and the beginnings of national vernacular litera- 
 tures were indications of a stirring of the mind of Europe of 
 which it would be difficult to find an explanation. The 
 national songs and poems which formed the basis of the 
 Romance of the Cid in Spain (from nSoA.D. onward), 
 the Chansons de Geste of a still earlier date, the Provencal 
 poets, the Niebelunglied in Germany (i3th century), the 
 Scandinavian Sagas (from ninth century onwards), the Romance 
 of Arthur among the Celts of England and its translation 
 into English, the Romances (chief of which was Amadis of 
 Gaul) were all unmistakable signs of the beginning of a way 
 of looking at human life and of a free enjoyment of the human 
 intellect in its own creations, which had little in common with 
 the ecclesiasticism and monasticism of the ages prior to the 
 i3th century 1 . It is probable, however, that the supreme agent 
 in reinstating in man a belief in his natural powers was the 
 intense intellectual activity at all University centres to which 
 I have referred above, and which led to the raising of many 
 questions which had been held to be finally settled. And 
 
 1 We get a very instructive account of the pre- Renaissance literary 
 activity in Warton's History of English Poetry.
 
 6 THE RENAISSANCE, 1320-1600 
 
 to this we may add the order of Chivalry so closely associated 
 with individual prowess and character. Thus Europe passed 
 out of a period of dogmatic and ecclesiastical bondage into the 
 freer life of the modern world by very gradual steps, and found 
 itself unawares in a new intellectual attitude to life and pos- 
 sessed by a higher faith in human capacities and possibilities. 
 This advance is correctly enough called the Renaissance. 
 
 The new movement ran in three main streams which had a 
 common source, and that common source was simply Reason 
 itself as a free, and even rebellious, activity. These streams 
 were Art, Religion, and Science, or, to put it otherwise, life in 
 life itself and nature impelled by its fulness to seek the satis- 
 faction of utterance in beautiful forms through the medium 
 of language and the other materials and vehicles of artistic ex- 
 pression; a new and deeper sense of the personal and immediate 
 relation of the spirit of man to the moral order and to God ; and 
 a pursuit of truth for its own sake. An immediate and fresh 
 looking at man and human experience may be said to sum 
 up the Revival. Thus we find living in the first period, Dante, 
 Petrarch, Boccaccio, and Chaucer ; and also WyklifFe, Huss, 
 and Jerome of Prag. When we consider the achievements of 
 these men, and the still earlier vernacular literatures to which 
 we have referred above, it is evident that the Renaissance was 
 not dependent on the revival of Latin and Greek literature for 
 its origin or its permanence. 
 
 It was, however, inevitable that in seeking for an expression 
 of Life and Art, the more active minds should be drawn to 
 what was ready-made, but had been forgotten. Latin literature 
 and, subsequently, the study of Greek, accordingly, were the 
 two great occupations of the Humanists. In the middle of the 
 i5th century, says Hallam, "The spirit of ancient learning was 
 diffused," on the Italian side of the Alps. "The Greek 
 language might then be learned in four or five cities, and an 
 acquaintance with it was a recommendation to the favour of 
 the great ; while the establishment of Universities at Pavia,
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-l6oO 7 
 
 Turin, Ferraraand Florence" (during the preceding generation) 
 " bore witness to the generous emulation which they served to 
 redouble and concentrate." Hallam, i. pt. i. ch. 2. Ambitious 
 scholars from Northern lands visited Italy to participate in the 
 new learning. Wessel was there in 1470, Rudolf Agricola in 
 1476. 
 
 It is correct to say that the first period of what is 
 commonly known as the Renaissance was, to begin with, 
 solely, and till towards the end of the i5th century chiefly, 
 Italian, whether we regard vernacular writings, the revived 
 study of Latin and Greek literature, the growth of Art, or 
 the reaction against mediaeval theology. Unfortunately, the 
 new delight in literature, art, and a natural life, and the total 
 breach with religious tradition, led to wide-spread scepticism 
 and to a loosening of moral bonds. A life of pleasure and 
 even of licence was characteristic of the time. Impatience 
 with the theological conception of life took a negative character, 
 and Christianity was nowhere at such a low ebb as in Rome 
 and the other cities of Northern Italy. 
 
 The second period of the Revival may be dated from the 
 fall of the Eastern capital (1453), and the consequent dispersion 
 of Greek scholars. This gave fresh life to the pursuit of ancient 
 learning, just as Hellenic studies received a great impulse in 
 ancient Rome after the fall of Corinth. The invention of 
 printing also was a vital factor in securing the diffusion and 
 permanence of Humanism, while the invention of the mariner's 
 compass had a potent effect in extending the world-view. For 
 more than a century, before and after the above date, men 
 occupied themselves chiefly with Hellenic and Roman literature. 
 Thereafter, the slowly growing vernacular and original literatures 
 of Europe began to take form, and gradually to oust the ancients 
 from exclusive possession. These continued to hold the field 
 only in the schools. Art in painting and architecture continued 
 to share in the general reawakening. 
 
 The second stream of the rebirth, anticipated by Wykliff e
 
 8 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-l6oO 
 
 Huss, and Jerome of Prag, was the Religious. In this field 
 of thought, man longed to see through form, dogma and 
 ritual into the realities of the life of the soul. The Human- 
 istic movement was thus closely allied with the theological, 
 north of the Alps. In Italy, theology had been abjured 
 and moral laxity had been the result. North of the Alps, 
 however, there was always present a genuine feeling for the 
 spiritual life, although the Courts of Princes had been largely 
 Italianized. A longing for 'reality' in divine things, as opposed 
 to mere dogmatic form, was conspicuous in the Mystics and in 
 such men as Wessel, of whom both Erasmus and Luther speak in 
 laudatory terms. But prior to him, Florentius Radewin, with 
 the consent of his master, Gerard Groote 1 , had founded the 
 "Brothers of the Common Life" (Hieronymians), whose 
 governing idea was life rather than doctrine, and who allied 
 their religious aims with a restricted humanistic study. Floren- 
 tius died in 1400, Wessel in 1489, and Thomas a Kempis in 1471. 
 I name these men because the great intellectual and moral forces 
 operating during the earlier portion of the second period are 
 to be found chiefly north of the Alps, if we are to take a large 
 view of the Renaissance. The pagan and unbelieving spirit 
 among the Humanists of Italy was not shared by the Northern 
 men. With them, Humanism and a reformed Theology based 
 on the original Gospels went hand in hand. There was no 
 separation of the Humanistic and the Religious revivals ; nor 
 indeed, when Humanism at its first dawn was recognized by 
 Catholic prelates in Italy, was it ever imagined that there 
 could be any necessary antagonism. 
 
 The houses and schools of the " brethren of the common 
 life " spread throughout the Netherlands, Germany and France. 
 The central motive-force was a religious one an attempt to 
 return to a simple New Testament life. They had, as I have 
 said above, a tendency to Mysticism. They were in fact Mystics, 
 in so far as subjective feeling and an intense personal experience 
 1 Born at Deventer 1340.
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O--l6oO 9 
 
 arising out of this, as opposed to elaborate dogma, governed 
 their Christianity. It was natural that such men should think 
 more of the education of the mass of the people than dogma- 
 tists or the literary humanists could be expected to do. They 
 welcomed humanistic learning certainly, but always as subordi- 
 nate to the religious life ; and, for a time, only in the restricted 
 form of classical Latin and the literature of the Romans. Even 
 in the struggles of the Reformation period, we find in Luther 
 (d. 1546) and Melanchthon (d. 1560) the Humanistic and 
 the Theological in perfect harmony. It has been usual to 
 regard the more literary Erasmus, because he disapproved of 
 some of Luther's methods and of his insistence on the doctrine 
 of Justification by Faith alone, as a kind of literary sce'ptic, like 
 the neo-pagan Italians. This accusation, it seems to me, is no 
 more true of him than it would be if directed against his English 
 friends Colet and Sir Thomas More. These men represented 
 what in this country has been called evangelical Broad-Church- 
 ism, and worked in the genuine spirit of Protestantism and of a 
 spiritual Christianity. The moderation of Erasmus as con- 
 trasted with the fiery zeal of Luther does not detract from his 
 earnestness. We find his humane and enlightened religious 
 convictions stated in his Enchiridion and in his exquisite and 
 sympathetic portraiture of the rare character of the Franciscan 
 John Vitrarius 1 . 
 
 The third stream of the Revival was a Scientific stream 
 an extended knowledge of the earth and inquiry into the 
 causes of things. This followed the literary and religious. 
 Advanced spirits began to study nature as a system of laws 
 and to supersede scholastic and theological a priori construc- 
 tions by knowledge based on the observation of facts. This 
 and the extension of geographical knowledge profoundly affected 
 
 1 See Drummond's Life of Erasmus, cap. IV. Also in his true "Method 
 of Theology" in the Novum Testatnentum.
 
 IO THE RENAISSANCE, 1320-1600 
 
 the world-view of all thinking men. Columbus, Galilei, Pom- 
 ponazzi, Ludovicus Vives all belong to the second period. 
 
 The old order as represented by the Pope and Charles V. 
 had now taken alarm and resisted all reform. The Church 
 quickly gathered together its forces ; and by the decrees of 
 the Council of Trent and the activity of its agents everywhere 
 and, with the help of the Jesuits (1540) and the Inquisition, 
 made great way in recovering its hold on the rebellious mind 
 of Europe. Humanism, the reformed religion, and national 
 liberty had now all to fight for their existence against the principle 
 of imperial absolutism supported by clerical absolutism centred 
 in the Pope. The larger and more vital human interest 
 necessarily obscured the lesser, and what concerned the life 
 of the masses of the people dwarfed the claims of Humanism 
 and culture which were for the few. Moreover, the example 
 of Italy had shown the world that a society whose dominating 
 idea was Art contained the germs of the decay of morals and 
 of all manly virtues. Man does not live by bread alone, that 
 is to say, a material civilization: Italy placed it beyond all 
 question that man cannot live by Art alone, however widely 
 we interpret that word. 
 
 Protestant and Catholic alike, in strengthening their de- 
 fences, had to surround themselves with the buttresses of 
 dogma; and thus the reformed religion, while retaining at its 
 heart the principle of freedom, yet narrowed itself to a stringent 
 orthodoxy which was, and still is, wherever it exists, almost 
 as great an enemy to the life and art and free philosophy 
 that are the essential characteristics of pure Humanism as 
 the mediaeval system was before it was put on its defence. 
 "U'ith this new orthodoxy was inseparably bound up an earnest 
 ethical spirit, the principles of civil and religious liberty, and 
 the eternal interests of the individual. Where could literature 
 and art find a footing in the face of such important political 
 and tremendous personal issues? Those belong to the 'world';
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, 1320-1600 II 
 
 and the true Christian, it was felt (as in the fourth century), can 
 know nothing of them, or at best only play with them. We 
 live in more fortunate times. The humanistic and the theo- 
 logical now respect each other's aims the theological spirit 
 having now accepted the best in literature and art and also 
 that result of the Renaissance which we call science; and 
 (what is of more importance), having become alive to funda- 
 mental questions, recognizing that these can only be answered 
 by the help of a free philosophy and scientific investigation 
 which shall unite religious thought with the humanistic and 
 naturalistic theory of life. But the parallel streams have not 
 yet wholly mingled their waters : that cannot happen until 
 religion shall have been wholly humanised, and philosophy, 
 literature and science have been in their turn consecrated. 
 
 In Italy we have, during this second period, in addition 
 to those I have named, Pico, and his friends Politian and 
 Ficino, and in the sphere of religion Savonarola (b. 1452); 
 in Holland Erasmus, and in England his friends Grocyn, 
 Linacre, Colet and More. Greek and a simpler theology than 
 that of Aquinas had already established itself at Oxford, 
 whither Erasmus came to extend his knowledge of it In 
 Germany we have, among others, Rudolf Agricola and 
 Reuchlin ; and in theology, the Mystics and Brethren of the 
 Common Life, to whom I have already referred '. 
 
 I am well aware that a brief survey of a great and complex 
 historical movement is, simply because it is inadequate, to 
 that extent inaccurate, but it is necessary to an intelligent 
 comprehension of education as affected by the Renaissance 
 that some such survey should be given.. We may take the 
 date of the death of Melanchthon (1560) as sufficiently well 
 
 1 Chiefly owing to the writings of the Neo-Platonist the pseudo- 
 Dionysius Areopagiticus, mysticism had never died out during the Middle 
 Ages; and, in truth, the writings of Dionysius taken along with those of 
 St Augustine entered, though not so largely as the philosophy of Aristotle, 
 into the work of the Schoolmen.
 
 12 THE RENAISSANCE, 1320-1600 
 
 indicating the period up to which the Religious Reformation 
 and Humanism maintained a close alliance north of the Alps. 
 The Humanism of the Reformation is, indeed, well represented 
 by Melanchthon's text-books for school and college. To this 
 date the Humanistic and Religious streams had not yet 
 separated their waters. They now, however, began to diverge. 
 
 The Order of the Jesuits was founded in 1540 and flung 
 down the gauntlet to Protestantism, while so far recognizing the 
 modern spirit as to take up into its educational system as much 
 of the new Humanism as was thought safe. Unfortunately, the 
 reformers of Church and School were too exclusively occupied 
 with the instruction in the evangelical faith of the masses of 
 the people to institute any agency of secondary education 
 capable of coping with the Jesuit organization. The Hiero- 
 nymians, or a Protestant Order on the same basis, and with 
 the same aims, could alone have done for modern ideas what 
 the Jesuits did for mediaeval doctrine and papal supremacy. 
 The scattered efforts of a great humanistic teacher here and 
 there were helpless in the presence of an organized force, with 
 an educational method, and backed by all the power of the 
 Roman Catholic Church. They confined themselves to the 
 education of the upper section of society, whilst the educa- 
 tional zeal of the Reformers, in perfect consistency with their 
 point of view, expended itself (as I have indicated) chiefly on 
 the common school and catechetical instruction. In the Uni- 
 versities the pervading influence was still theological and 
 Aristotelian. 
 
 Classical Humanism had now reached the age of criticism 
 and learned editions, culminating in those scholars, of whom 
 the younger Scaliger and Casaubon may be regarded as 
 principes. It is interesting to note in the divergent move- 
 ments of religion and literature the same tendencies to 
 criticism, revision and formulation after the first fervour had 
 exhausted itself. And yet we may say that, down to about the
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, 1320-1600 13 
 
 year 1600, Latin 'style' was still the mark of the humanistic 
 man of culture, just as a genuine faith in the living substance, 
 as opposed to the dogmatic form, of Christianity was still the 
 mark of the reformed theologian. 
 
 The above brief survey will enable us to see how the study 
 of language became the common bond between the literary 
 and religious promoters of the Revival in the i5th and i6th 
 centuries. A barbarous and monkish Latinity was the vehicle 
 of a barbarous and monkish conception of life. We cannot 
 separate Language and Thought. Hence the identification of 
 the Humanistic Revival as Literary and Aesthetic with the 
 study of Latin and Greek the two great vehicles of literature 
 and art common to the European world. Hence, too, the 
 identification of the revival of a pure Christianity with the 
 critical study of the same languages and of Hebrew. Latin 
 and Greek literature contained models of literary excellence, 
 while Greek and Hebrew contained the primitive record of a 
 great historical faith. To understand the true significance of 
 the faith it was necessary to understand the original records 
 in which it was given first to the world. The great weapon 
 against the religious corruptions of the time accordingly was 
 the Bible and nothing but the Bible, and its interpretation 
 in the spirit of antiquity and unencumbered by the dogmatism 
 of the Church and the dialectic of the schoolmen. This was 
 the teaching of the great Erasmus, who was less scholastic 
 than Luther, but as genuinely Christian. Men had to receive 
 the truths of God anew and to start afresh, as it were. Hence, 
 we may here say, the necessity of always maintaining scholarship 
 in a historical Church, if it is not to become an organ of 
 ignorant fanaticism and alienate all save the unhistorical 
 vulgar ; nay, even because of its extravagances and supersti- 
 tions, shut out the majority of reasonable men. In Philosophy, 
 Literature, Art, Theology and, we may add, in Political Science 
 also, we must ever and in all ages fall back on original sources,
 
 14 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-I6OO 
 
 and be constantly bringing to light the primary significance of 
 what has been achieved by our ancestors ; and this by a critical 
 study not only of their language, but also of the conditions of 
 past life. This, in fact, is History in its fundamental sense ; 
 and it will be granted universally that, if man is a progressive 
 being, he must understand the steps of his past progress, or, 
 failing this, go on repeating the barbarisms, not only of language, 
 but of thought and life, which preceded the great intellectual 
 epochs of the Hebrews, the Greeks and the Romans, the 
 nations which have laid the foundations of our modern poli- 
 tical societies, our individual culture, our philosophies and our 
 religious convictions. 
 
 Language, being thus the common bond of all the workers 
 of the Renaissance period, we must not be surprised that in 
 the education of youth it should itself have become an object 
 of idolatry and ultimately also of well-deserved satire. This 
 was one of the extravagances that attend all great movements, 
 whether they be intellectual or aesthetic, political or religious. 
 Note also that the idolatry of language was a restoration of the 
 ideal of education of Roman imperial times, viz. Oratory. But 
 we must never forget that the revival of Greek and Hebrew 
 had other than literary objects in view. Reuchlin, in first 
 introducing these languages into Germany, with his intense 
 humanism and simple scriptural Christianity, truly prepared 
 the way for Luther, by fixing attention on the original records, 
 and thus on the true meaning of the documents on which the 
 Church was founded. 
 
 It would be a great error, however, to suppose that the 
 influence of the Renaissance on education was restricted to 
 language. The Renaissance destroyed, as well as built up 
 anew, in every department of education. 
 
 "The education of the Middle Ages," says Mons. Compayre, 
 " once rigid and repressive, which condemned the body to a 
 regime too severe and the mind to a discipline too narrow, is 
 now to be followed (at least in theory) by an education broader
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-l6oO 15 
 
 and more liberal ; which will give due attention to hygiene and 
 physical exercises ; which will enfranchise the intelligence 
 hitherto the prisoner of the syllogism ; which will substitute 
 real studies for the verbal subtleties of dialectic ; which will 
 give the preference to things over words ; which, finally, instead 
 of developing but a single faculty, the reason, and instead of 
 reducing man to a sort of dialectic automaton, will seek to 
 develope the whole man in mind and body, taste and knowledge, 
 heart and will " (p. 83). 
 
 The Humanism of Italy in the i5th century gave Europe 
 its new secondary school curriculum. Schoolmasters seem 
 however never to have realized that the Humanistic school 
 as originally conceived was much more than Humanistic; it 
 was Renaissance. It embraced much more than grammar 
 and,style. But even if we imitated the more eminent teachers 
 of the 1 6th century in the greater breadth of our curriculum, 
 it would be a mistake to allow ancient languages to dominate 
 the whole system as we have done hitherto. The Humanists 
 educated the few : we have now to give the higher education 
 to all above a certain age, and it is incumbent on us to re- 
 member this difference, and, in the light of it, to reconsider 
 our educational instruments. And this we can do effectually 
 only by considering the question of education itself what it 
 means, what it proposes to itself as aim. And this again 
 must be considered in close relation to the environment and 
 duties of modern nations. If we should come to the conclusion 
 that the purpose of educating a human mind can after all, 
 even in the 20th century, be best attained by bringing modern 
 boys into a living acquaintance with the literature of Greece 
 and Rome, then let us lay all our strength on this and try at 
 last to succeed. We have as yet failed. I should like the 
 Conference of Headmasters (confidentially) to tell the public 
 how many boys are annually stirred by a line of Homer, 
 touched by a line of Virgil, or led to appreciate eloquence by
 
 16 THE RENAISSANCE, I32O-l6oO 
 
 an oration of Cicero or Demosthenes. Whether from want of 
 method or some other cause, failure is the one word that is 
 applicable to what we call ' classical ' education in the case of 
 95 per cent, of those who are said to have been ' put through ' 
 it. And as to the remaining 5 per cent, the educational result 
 has in not a few cases been narrowness and pedantry and 
 preciosity the very negation of the true and living Renais- 
 sance spirit. 
 
 Personally I am disposed to think that there are no 
 instruments that can compare with Latin and Greek literature 
 if our purpose be culture. But to secure this result boys must, 
 in the university, be fit to receive and in a position to continue 
 the instruction which the school only begins. How many are 
 fit to receive and what proportion of those who receive and 
 respond are able, in face of the pressing demands of modern 
 life, to acquire familiarity with the great masters of antiquity ? 
 Can we think of no other scheme of education which will con- 
 serve the past while fitting for the living present ? Can we find 
 no modern definition of Humanism 1 ? 
 
 In the preceding pages I have endeavoured to give a brief 
 and general survey of the Renaissance down to 1600, and to 
 indicate generally its relation to education in the larger sense. 
 Our special business now is to speak of it solely in relation to 
 the actual work of school and university ; and this I shall 
 best do by adverting, to begin with, to the first period of the 
 Revival 1320-1450 and to the celebrated Italian school of 
 Vittorino da Feltre, which led the way for all Europe in point 
 of time at least, if not as a model. 
 
 Meanwhile let us note that we should expect to find in 
 schools the fertilizing effects of what I have called the three 
 streams of the Revival : the Literary, the Religious, and the 
 Scientific. 
 
 1 The closing chapter of Professor Lodge's Close of the Middle Ages 
 gives an excellent survey of the Renaissance Period, at once succinct and 
 full.
 
 THE RENAISSANCE, 1320-1600 I/ 
 
 The restoration of antiquity gave the chief direction to the 
 work of the secondary schools for obvious reasons. It was 
 only at school and in the university that a knowledge of the 
 ancients could be obtained. Latin and Greek had to be 
 laboriously acquired, whereas the active-minded student could 
 read his Dante and Petrarch and all vernacular contributions 
 to literature without the help of masters. This theory of 
 secondary instruction soon prevailed over all Europe, and 
 still governs the curriculum and aims of British secondary 
 schools. Nor, indeed, would there be much to regret in 
 this if boys got what they were supposed to get, and if the 
 modern "Public School" were as broad and vivifying in its 
 teaching as the earliest schools of the Renaissance both north 
 and south of the Alps. Save in a few cases, the European 
 schoolboy is as a matter of fact not humanized by Latin and 
 Greek. And I hold that it is not, under modern conditions, 
 possible to humanize him on so narrow a basis without a liberal 
 use of translations, familiarity with vernacular literature and 
 an introduction to national and universal history. 
 
 L.
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE RENAISSANCE AND THE SCHOOL- 
 FIRST PERIOD (13201450). 
 
 THE thought of the Middle Ages, penetrated and sustained 
 (from A.D. 1050 at least) by the philosophy of Aristotle ', may 
 be said to have summed itself up in the organizing intellect of 
 St Thomas Aquinas, who died 1274. St Thomas was an 
 Italian, and it is in Italy also that we find the earliest 
 intellectual movements which are associated with the revival 
 of letters. In Italy it began, in so far as it was not an 
 outburst of native genius in the vernacular tongue, with a 
 resuscitation of the country's own ancient literature. 
 
 I have already said that it is incorrect to say that the new 
 awakening of the mind of Europe to poetry and the arts was 
 determined by the renewed interest in Virgil and Cicero and 
 the subsequent influence of Greek writers. Europe had, in 
 fact, long before begun to seek original expression for its own 
 view of human life. The Provencal poetry, the Northern 
 sagas, the Nibelungenlied, the poetry of the Anglo-Saxons, 
 the mediaeval romances efflorescing in Amadis of Gaul, were 
 the beginnings of a literature which owed nothing to a know- 
 ledge of the ancients ; and it would be a curious speculation 
 
 1 Partially known.
 
 FIRST PERIOD. DA FELTRE 19 
 
 what modern literature would have been had it developed on 
 its own independent lines. The rediscovery of the literary 
 achievements of Rome and Greece accordingly, while they 
 gave a powerful impulse to modern thought and linguistic 
 expression, did not create it. And they gave more than 
 impulse. They presented modern Europe, still struggling 
 with its native forms of speech, with a perfected medium of 
 sentiment and thought literary art of the highest kind. The 
 natural result was that Latin, which had always remained, 
 though barbarized, the language of the educated, was now 
 considered to be the only worthy vehicle of expression. The 
 revival of pure Latinity was thus identified with the revival of 
 literature itself. It cannot be said that at any time this revival 
 of Latin gave birth, save in the case of Erasmus, to genuine 
 literature in Latin. Even Petrarch only partially succeeded. 
 From first to last the writers of the Renaissance were imitative, 
 and even consciously imitative ; and original genius could not 
 find expression for itself through what was essentially a foreign 
 medium. All that Latin even with the help of Greek could 
 give, apart from the substance of thought, was vocables, form, 
 and a standard of excellence. We are not far from the truth 
 in saying that a genuine literature is not possible save as a native 
 growth through the organ of the common speech of a people 
 the mother-tongue of the writer. 
 
 Vittorino da Feltre, 1378 1446. 
 
 The typical school of the First Renaissance was that of 
 Vittorino da Feltre, born 1378, died 1446. At Mantua, 
 whither he had gone on the invitation of the lord of 
 Mantua (Gonzaga), he opened a school for his children and 
 such others as might be admitted. As directly connected with 
 the reigning family this school might be called a Palatine 
 school, like that of Charlemagne and the ninth century 1 . 
 1 Also the school of Nebuchadnezzar and of the Persian kings.
 
 20 FIRST PERIOD. DA FELTRE 
 
 The success of the school was due to the genius of Vittorino. 
 Endowed with a large share of common sense, he was able to 
 organize a school on the basis of Humanism which neither 
 exaggerated the claims of the ancients nor broke with the 
 mediaeval Christian ideal. The paganism, which already was 
 infecting the Renaissance, was as far removed from Vittorino's 
 sympathies as from those of the transalpine German Humanists 
 of the second period of the Revival. His educational method 
 was influenced by the ancients so far that a sound body was 
 regarded as the condition of a sound mind. Hence games 
 and bodily exercises, to which he attached great importance. 
 The supreme aim, however, was the penetration of the Christian 
 life with classical culture. But he did not exclude, as did 
 many subsequent schools which called themselves Humanistic, 
 other subjects of instruction. He believed that variety of 
 work promoted greater energy and activity of mind in the 
 pursuit of the dominant studies of the school. Arithmetic, 
 geometry, natural philosophy, natural history and music were 
 all admitted to the curriculum. As regards mere intellectual 
 culture, this was measured by him, as by all Humanists every- 
 where, by command over language. Ratio showed itself in 
 Oratio. Hence the great attention paid to constant composition 
 in Latin on the model of Cicero. In corporal punishment 
 Vittorino did not believe. He could dispense with it ; and, 
 indeed, I doubt if any great educator can be named who has 
 not dispensed with it, save in the very last resort. The moral 
 training of the pupils, extending even to their personal carriage, 
 was, considering the looseness of the time, rigid in its character ; 
 but it was accomplished by personal influence and supervision, 
 not by coercion. Vespasiano says that Da Feltre's academy 
 was a " sanctuary of manners, deeds, and words." Vittorino's 
 school was thus, in marked contrast to the monastic and 
 cathedral schools, an active, healthy, and happy school, with 
 a clearly defined ethical character. 
 
 We cannot read the account given by Mr Woodward and
 
 FIRST PERIOD. DA FELTRE 21 
 
 Mr Addington Symonds (resting largely on Rosmini's life of 
 Da Feltre) without seeing that this typical Humanist, both in 
 respect of aim and method, was a close follower of Quintilian 1 . 
 The education given was Roman, not Hellenic, as became an 
 Italian school. Much of Quintilian was known before Poggio 
 discovered a complete MS. in 1414 at S. Gallen. Doubtless 
 Vittorino had perused the whole. 
 
 Vittorino died at the age of sixty-nine in 1446, the date at 
 which one may fix the beginning of the second period of the 
 Renaissance. " Wholly dedicated to the cares of teaching," says 
 Mr Addington Symonds 2 , "more anxious to survive in the 
 good fame of his scholars than to secure the immortality of 
 literature, Vittorino bequeathed no writings to posterity. He 
 lived to a hale and hearty old age, and when he died in 1446 
 it was found that the illustrious scholar, after enjoying for so 
 many years the liberality of his princely patron, had not 
 accumulated enough money to pay for his own funeral. What- 
 ever he possessed he spent in charity during his lifetime, 
 trusting to the kindness of his friends to bury him when dead. 
 Few lives of which there is any record in history are so 
 perfectly praiseworthy as Vittorino's : few men have more 
 nobly realized the idea of living for the highest objects of 
 their age; few have succeeded in keeping themselves so wholly 
 unspotted by the vices of the world around them." 
 
 The " importance of the position of Vittorino " (says 
 Mr Woodward, p. 91) "lay partly in his own scholarship and 
 reading but more in the genius which he manifested in 
 reducing the vast body of rediscovered literature to the 
 service of a new education" "The old ideal of knowledge, 
 the growth of centuries, was replaced almost within a generation 
 by a new one which should correspond in some way with a 
 
 1 "Roman Education," in The Historical Survey of Pre-Christian 
 Edufation, Longmans, 1897. 
 * Revival of Learning, p. 297.
 
 22 FIRST PERIOD. DA FELTRE 
 
 deeper sense of national continuity and of the breadth of 
 human interests." "The relation of the new hope to the old 
 faith, the balance between literary form and moral content, 
 the conflict between the Greek ideal of the body and the 
 asceticism of the Church here were some of the graver 
 problems that pressed for attention." And I think that we 
 may say that Vittorino solved these problems for himself and 
 for the modern spirit in a combination of religious and 
 Humanistic teaching well-fitted to produce the cultured gentle- 
 man and capable citizen. Hallam (Lit. Hist. i. pt. i. cap. 2) 
 says, " If Gasparin (of Bergamo) was the best writer of this 
 generation, the most accomplished instructor was Victorin 
 of Feltre, to whom the Marquis of Mantua entrusted the 
 education of his own children. Many of the Italian nobility 
 and some distinguished scholars were brought up under the 
 care of Victorin in that city ; and in a very corrupt age he was 
 still more zealous for their moral than their literary improvement. 
 A pleasing account of his method of discipline will be found 
 in Tiraboschi, or more fully in Corniani from a life written by 
 one of Victorin's pupils, Prendilacqua. ' It could hardly be 
 believed,' says Tiraboschi, 'that in an age of such rude manners 
 a model of such perfect education could be found : if all to 
 whom the care of youth is entrusted would make it theirs, 
 what rich fruits they would derive from their labours ! ' The 
 learning of Victorin was extensive ; he possessed a moderate 
 library, and, rigidly demanding a minute exactness from his 
 pupils in their interpretation of ancient authors as well as in 
 their own compositions, laid the foundations of a propriety of 
 style which the next age was to display." 
 
 Among the writers on Education in Italy bred under the 
 impulse of the first Revival were : 
 
 (1) L. Bruni D'Arezzo who wrote De Studiis et Litter is 
 about 1405. 
 
 (2) Petrus Paulus Vergerius, one of the earliest humanistic
 
 FIRST PERIOD. DA FELTRE 23 
 
 writers on Education, who was born in 1349 and wrote a 
 treatise, De ingenuis moribus, about 1392. 
 
 (3) Battista Guarino, born in 1434, wrote De Ordine 
 Docendi et Studendi (1459). 
 
 (4) Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini (Pope Pius II., died 1464), 
 wrote a treatise, De Liberorum Educatione. 
 
 These treatises have been translated by Mr Woodward in 
 his excellent book, Vittorino da Feltre and other Humanist 
 Educators (1897). They all breathe a common spirit. The 
 materials of education, apart from a grounding in Christian 
 faith and practice, are, whether we look to the making of the 
 man or the citizen, Language and Literature as exemplified in 
 the practice of Vittorino. This was the conviction of the 
 Humanists. The Christian life was to be sustained and adorned 
 by the life of culture, and culture was attainable only through 
 the Roman classics, and to a limited extent the Greek writers. 
 The methods of teaching and discipline advocated were, on the 
 whole, much sounder than any that were prevalent even during 
 the second Revival, and far in advance of the practice of 
 secondary schools down to the present time. The training of 
 the body and gymnastic were not lost sight of, I have said, nor 
 were other subjects than Latin ignored. In brief, the whole 
 educational movement of the First Renaissance and much of 
 the Second was an attempt to restore the best type of Romano- 
 Hellenic school as that is presented in Quintilian 1 . 
 
 We are not, of course, to suppose that there were many 
 schools modelled on that of Vittorino da Feltre or reaching the 
 perfection conceived by those Italians who wrote on Education. 
 But the general spirit and aim of the Humanists undoubtedly 
 began to leaven much of the instruction and to suggest also a 
 humaner moral discipline. 
 
 1 Greek was only beginning to be studied and taught.
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE SECOND PERIOD OF THE RENAISSANCE 
 
 (1450 1600). 
 
 Trotzendorf; Sturm; Neander. 
 
 IT was only in the sphere of Christian doctrinal reform that 
 the first Revival can be said to have been operative north of 
 the Alps. It was identified largely with the names of Wykliffe 
 and Huss, and, we may add, Florentius Radewin (died 1400), 
 the founder of the " Brothers of the Common Life," whose 
 aim was practical Christianity (with a tendency to Mysticism) 
 rather than the cultivation of scholastic theology or religious 
 ritual. The second period of the Revival it is customary to 
 date from 1453, the Fall of Constantinople. The renewed 
 impulse given by the dispersion of Greek scholars, coinciding 
 as it did with the earliest practical application of the printing 
 art, guaranteed permanence. It was only this second Humanistic 
 revival which fully reached Northern nations. To this period 
 belong the transalpine names of Nicolaus of Cusa (d. 1464), at 
 once schoolman,' Humanist, and religious reformer in the 
 Catholic sense, Rudolf Agricola (d. 1485), Rabelais, Montaigne, 
 Hegius, Erasmus, Sturm, etc. So early as 1476 we find Alex. 
 Hegius at Deventer teaching the elements of Greek and a 
 classical Latinity in the spirit of Humanism to the boy Erasmus 
 among others. But it was quite the end of the century before 
 this example was much followed. The Cathedral school of
 
 TROTZENDORF ; STURM ; NEANDER 25 
 
 Miinster under Langen and Murmellius was famous in the 
 beginning of the :6th century. 
 
 The best results of the Humanistic revival in the school 
 were, however, not fully visible north of the Alps until Trot- 
 zendorf, friend of Melanchthon, began his scholastic career 
 in 1516 at Gorlitz and afterwards as rector (1524) of the 
 Goldberg school. There were many schools, it is true, 
 throughout Europe in which instruction was given on the 
 lines of Trotzendorf, but none so celebrated as his. The 
 organization of the school, the extent to which the elder boys 
 were employed to assist the master both in the discipline and 
 the teaching, the spirit of friendliness between the master and 
 the elder pupils, all anticipate in a remarkable way what is 
 related of Dr Arnold. His school was called a "second 
 Latium." Latin alone was spoken, and the writing of themes 
 in classical Latinity was one of the chief aims of the grammati- 
 cal discipline. The authors read were, Cicero, Terence, Plautus, 
 Virgil and Ovid. In addition to this, Greek grammar and 
 selections from Greek authors formed part of the curriculum, 
 while logic and rhetoric (the latter chiefly based on the study 
 of Cicero's Orations, guided doubtless by the De Oratore] were 
 taught. Natural philosophy, music, and arithmetic, as then 
 understood, also received an adequate measure of attention. 
 Religious teaching was a conspicuous feature of the school, no 
 less than literature. From this course of instruction we may 
 infer the character of the school, and of similar schools in their 
 degree. He died in 1556. A very eminent schoolmaster he 
 was. 
 
 The course of school instruction under the Humanistic in- 
 fluence may also be gathered from the record of John Sturm of 
 Strassburg, where he began his celebrated Gymnasium in 1537, 
 continuing to superintend it for forty-five years. Sturm, a 
 distinguished scholar and theologian who had taught Greek 
 in Paris, was allied more to the French and Calvinistic 
 than the Lutheran reformers. He was a vigorous and stern
 
 26 TROTZENDORF ; STURM ; NEANDER 
 
 master and insisted on the strict obedience of his assistants 
 in the Gymnasium as well as on application to study on the 
 part of the boys. He was a typical disciplinarian. His great 
 idea was education by means of Latin to which Greek was only 
 accessory. The power of speech was with him almost an end 
 in itself. Modern subjects, in so far as they were recognized 
 in the school, were subordinate to the Latinizing of them. He 
 desired that Latin should meet all the requirements of modern 
 life, and it is not an exaggeration to say that educated 
 Europe would now be speaking and writing in Latin alone, 
 if Sturm had had his way 1 . His strong points as a school- 
 master were the accuracy of work he demanded from each 
 class and his power of organization. There were nine classes, 
 beginning with boys of seven years of age. Each class had 
 its master and each master had in his hand an epistle from 
 the Rector which constituted his marching orders, so to speak. 
 The Strassburg Gymnasium was in fact the model of the 
 Jesuit schools and of all the secondary schools of Europe, 
 much more than the more enlightened Lutheran and Italian 
 schools. 
 
 Sturm wrote extensively on the subject of Education. 
 
 Michael Neander, again, pupil of Melanchthon, and rector 
 of the Cloister school at Ilfeld in the Hartz, was born in 1525, 
 and died in 1595. His conceptions of education were large and 
 comprehensive. He had, I think, a more living mind than any 
 other Northern schoolmaster. He even asked himself why he 
 should teach Latin and Greek at all a daring, even audacious 
 question in the full tide of Humanism. This openness of mind 
 was, I say, of the essence of Humanism, though already many 
 of the leading Humanists had foreclosed all such questions. 
 Ciceronian Latin had become a fetich, as Erasmus saw. It was 
 not possible for more than one generation of grown men to live 
 solely by imitation. I do not say that Neander, or even 
 
 1 See footnote on p. 146.
 
 TROTZENDORF ; STURM ; NEANDER 27 
 
 Melanchthon, deliberately recognized this. They were too 
 much involved in the movement. The question, indeed, could 
 not arise with them ; for the duty of all men, then and there, 
 was to connect the life of the modern world with the pre- 
 Christian. And yet, where the true Hellenic spirit showed 
 itself it could not but be a living and progressive spirit. 
 
 Neander showed by his teaching and his curriculum that he 
 possessed the true Hellenic spirit in fuller measure than most. 
 History, geography, science, music, all entered into his school 
 in addition to the traditionary (but reformed) grammar, rhetoric, 
 and dialectic. He had to make books to supply his wants, 
 where Melanchthon had not already anticipated him. A hand- 
 book of natural philosophy and a Compendium Chronicorum 
 (a kind of universal history) and a geography entitled Orbis 
 Terrae Divisio came from his pen. Up to the sixteenth year 
 Latin and Greek were the chief subjects studied ; but there 
 was a wide course of reading so wide indeed that much of it 
 must have been cursive. In the sixteenth year Hebrew was 
 begun, and in the seventeenth and eighteenth the elements and 
 chief precepta of logic and rhetoric ; and thereafter physics, 
 geography, and history. If we compare this curriculum with 
 that of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, we become 
 alive to the barrenness of even our best schools, after the 
 ardour of young Humanism had cooled. The realism, which 
 is also the reality, of Humanism was, in truth, nobly illustrated 
 at Ilfeld ; for there, under Neander, are found the direct con- 
 tact of the young mind with a wide range of literature, 
 with rhetoric, dialectic, history, and also with the world of 
 nature. 
 
 We are not to imagine, however, that there were many 
 schools even in the earlier decades of the i6th century like 
 those of Murmellius, Trotzendorf, Neander, and Sturm ; but 
 there were not a few working on the same lines : and in 
 England, after the reforms of Colet (friend of Erasmus and 
 More) in the foundation of St Paul's, the stream of literary
 
 28 TROTZENDORF ; STURM ; NEANDER 
 
 Humanism flowed through many schools during the i6th century 
 Stratford-on-Avon, among others, which Shakespeare attended. 
 Elyot and Ascham (1515-1568) were along with Mulcaster its 
 literary prophets. 
 
 In the institutions of the men whom I have named we 
 find the best types of the Humanistic school. There was in all 
 of them, as in the earlier Italian school of Da Feltre, a com- 
 bination of religious with Humanistic aims. The classical 
 fervour of Italy and the religious earnestness of the North met 
 in the educational leaders ; and many other teachers through- 
 out Germany, France, and the Low Countries, though less 
 personally distinguished, carried the same combined influences 
 into the daily work of instruction. Nor did these combined 
 aims ever after wholly cease to characterize the secondary 
 schools of Europe. The general curriculum was, however, 
 soon narrowed and the methods degenerated. 
 
 The narrowing of the educational aim and the return to mere 
 verbalism was, in truth, not long of coming. If it be the essence 
 of Humanism in its larger meaning that it was an opening of 
 men's eyes afresh to nature and life, the exhaustion of the new 
 movement can be easily understood. For it is given to few 
 men, and those chiefly of poetic temperament, to keep their 
 eyes open for long. There is an instinctive craving for dogma 
 and form ; for without these there is no intellectual repose. 
 Each man's philosophy of life is fixed at the point where he 
 grows tired of thinking, it has been said. Even the educated 
 man begins to build his own prison-house very early. Especially 
 must this be the case with teachers, simply because they have 
 to teach ; and for this a schoolroom creed of some sort is 
 necessary. They gladly accept what is offered them in the 
 name of authority and tradition, and it is the letter of the 
 doctrine, not the spirit, that governs. They imitate what they 
 have seen done, or apply the technique of a new doctrine 
 which they have once accepted as if it were a revelation. Some 
 schoolmasters will resent this estimate; but the fact is, it is
 
 TROTZENDORF ; STURM ; NEANDER 2Q 
 
 only those who recognize the truth of what I say as to the 
 tendency of the pedagogic mind who do think, and keep them- 
 selves fresh and open. The intellectual effort and the moral 
 courage required to organize, and the personal enthusiasm re- 
 quired to maintain, the inner life of the Humanistic school of 
 the 1 5th and i6th centuries must have been the endowment 
 of few. 
 
 The second period of the Renaissance saw the philological 
 and textual movement in full activity, and was distinguished by 
 the names, among others, of the younger Scaliger and Casaubon, 
 and on the religious side by the formulation of Protestant 
 dogma. The schools unfortunately felt the movement at once, 
 because of the tendency of all teaching to content itself with 
 form and formula and precept. There was no agency for 
 maintaining a scholastic aim and method ; the scholastic pro- 
 fession in short was not a profession : it took the colour of the 
 time. It had no independent vitality and no philosophic basis. 
 
 But every great movement, even when it is spent, leaves 
 some gain for the world. When we ask ourselves what the 
 1 6th century did for the secondary schools of Europe, we have 
 only to compare the work of the old cathedral and monastery 
 schools with those of the i6th and iyth centuries. The 
 classical authors of Greece and Rome were now firmly es- 
 tablished as instruments of instruction. It is true that the 
 spirit of Vittorino da Feltre, of Neander and Sturm and Ascham 
 was lost in the lyth century; but classical books remained, and 
 could not be taken away. Grammar, though then (and now) 
 badly taught, was simplified, because the text-books had been 
 simplified. These were two solid facts which survived and 
 defied the dullest of teachers. 
 
 But it appears to me that this was all. The glimmerings of 
 method and the ethical fervour born of the alliance of Humanism 
 with the reformed Christianity had disappeared, and grammar 
 and flagellation, twin brothers, had reasserted themselves
 
 30 TROTZENDORF ; STURM ; NEANDER. 
 
 indeed from many schools they had never disappeared. Many 
 causes contributed to this : the school cannot be permanently 
 in advance of the time, and every organ of progressive civiliza- 
 tion must wait for peace among the nations. 
 
 Meanwhile the great scheme of the evangelical Humanists 
 which contemplated a vernacular education for all had received 
 practical effect in many towns ; but as a universal scheme it 
 had to wait (except in Scotland, and, later, in Saxony) on poli- 
 tical enfranchisement for its full recognition ; and this was a 
 business of about 300 years. The extension, however, of 
 primary vernacular religious schools, which had existed in towns 
 before the Reformation, had received a powerful impulse, and 
 continued to advance wherever the reformed religion was 
 honestly held as a religion of personal conviction and soul- 
 experience. The central position of the Reformers was that 
 between man and God in Christ the personal relation was 
 immediate. No external authority could relieve a man of his 
 duty to work out his own salvation. For this, knowledge of the 
 truth assimilated by himself was essential, and this, again, was 
 impossible without instruction. Popular education was thus 
 a logical necessity of the position.
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 UNIVERSITIES. 
 
 IN the Universities the permanent gain to the Humanists was 
 chiefly the introduction of Latin literature, of Greek, a little 
 mathematics, and the genuine Aristotle (though still taught 
 chiefly through a Latin medium), aided by scholastic text-books 
 and bald epitomes. The study of Civil Law had now also 
 more reference to the spirit and life of antiquity, and Medicine 
 began to be more scientific in its ground-work. These higher 
 institutions were however essentially conservative and responded 
 very slowly and unwillingly to the claims of Humanism and of 
 the modern spirit generally. 
 
 It has to be remembered that universities were for long 
 placed in a difficult position. They were scholae publicae to 
 which all might go, fit or unfit ; and so long as the secondary 
 schools were few in number they had themselves to discharge 
 the function of secondary schools, as they still do at Oxford 
 and Cambridge in the case of all who are unable to pass 
 the previous examination on entrance 1 , and also in the case 
 of the ordinary pass- man. The necessity thus imposed on 
 universities, and which led to their being attended by boys 
 of 13 or 14, had in mediaeval times been fully accepted, 
 especially at Paris. The result must have been a low standard 
 
 1 In the Scottish Universities all have to pass a preliminary examination 
 on entrance.
 
 32 UNIVERSITIES 
 
 of general attainment, except for a select few. Then, the practice 
 of giving school instruction at the universities reacted everywhere 
 throughout Europe to prevent the erection of secondary schools. 
 But the general conception of a university as a school of the 
 higher faculties, law, medicine, theology, and of philosophy 
 (which also was practically a higher faculty) was never quite 
 lost sight of. In Italy during the i5th and i6th centuries 
 Professors of Latin and Greek literature gathered round them 
 at University and Court centres all who desired culture as 
 opposed to professional instruction, but the universities them- 
 selves were not re-organized on a Humanistic basis. The 
 lecturers were in truth constantly moving from place to place 
 like the Greek Rhetoricians in Roman imperial times. 
 
 Prior to the i6th century the higher university intellect 
 occupied itself in the department of Arts mainly with logic 
 and metaphysics, as interpreted by the schoolmen in un- 
 classical Latin, and too often based on a partially understood 
 Aristotle. But in the midst of all this they were trying to 
 read for themselves the riddle of life and thought, and they 
 were accomplishing great things, when we consider the con- 
 ditions under which they worked and the complex dogmatism 
 which they had to rationalize. "Scarcely thirty years ago," 
 says Erasmus (1516) in a letter to a friend (quoted in 
 Seebohm's Oxford Reformers, p. 399), " nothing was taught at 
 Cambridge but the pan'a logicalia of Alexander, antiquated 
 exercises from Aristotle, and the ' Quaestiones ' of Scotus. In 
 process of time improved studies were added, viz., mathematics, 
 a new, or at all events a renovated Aristotle, and a knowledge 
 of Greek letters." After the i5th century, though scholastic 
 logic and disputations still occupied the field, yet the ultimate 
 reference was now to a better understood authority. 
 
 Luther desired to see the curriculum relieved from the 
 Aristotelian metaphysics, ethics, and physics, as taught from 
 text-books, and confined to the logic, rhetoric, and poetics in 
 the original, or studied in epitomes of the original. Cicero's
 
 UNIVERSITIES *33 
 
 rhetoric also he advocated, but without cumbrous commentaries. 
 These philosophic studies, with the addition of Latin, Greek 
 and Hebrew and their literatures, would have constituted 
 Luther's scheme of university reform ; and substantially also 
 Melanchthon's. And this with the introduction of a better 
 mathematics was in truth the general line which reform took 
 where it was welcomed. At best, however, it was only initiated. 
 
 In short, even after the i6th century, the Aristotelian 
 encyclopaedia (metaphysics, logic, ethics, poetics, politics, 
 physics) was the ideal curriculum ; but now more genuinely 
 Aristotelian than formerly, and not so thickly overlaid with 
 commentary. The mass of students, however, could never 
 get beyond their text-books, and these were still highly 
 scholastic in their form. Thus the complaints of men like 
 Bacon (b, 1561), and subsequently Milton (b. 1608), re-echoed 
 by all educational reformers, were fully justified. In truth, the 
 resettlement of the Faith of Europe, and the great political 
 issues everywhere at stake, added to the natural conservatism 
 of universities, and the inadequate preparation of those coming 
 to them from secondary schools retarded the full growth of 
 modern ideas in the higher education. And yet the planting 
 of mathematics and Greek in Academic Halls and the study of 
 the ancient literatures, by the few at least, were permanent 
 gains. The universities, however, like the rest of the world, 
 had to wait for Bacon and Descartes and Newton, before they 
 could begin to throw off their mediaevalism ; and they, doubt- 
 less, owed it to the growth of modern literatures that the true 
 purpose of studying the ancient classics was kept alive by being 
 understood. 
 
 George Buchanan, the Scottish Humanist, who had taught 
 in the Humanistic College (secondary school) of Bordeaux 
 when Montaigne was a pupil there, and was familiar with 
 the work of the University of Paris, drew up a scheme for 
 the reform of the University of St Andrews, which was printed 
 in 1570. This is to my mind a very interesting document,
 
 34 UNIVERSITIES 
 
 as being a product of the Humanistic revival, and a record 
 of the university scheme of the Humanists 1 . It is well worthy 
 of our attention as showing the then curriculum of a good 
 university, and I shall give the substance of it. In what we 
 should call the secondary school, but what Buchanan calls 
 (as being part of the university) the " College of Humanity," 
 the course was to extend over six years. From the first, all 
 were required to speak Latin and write a Latin theme daily. 
 Their first reading-book was to be Terence, and thereafter 
 Cicero, Ovid, Virgil and Horace. In the fourth year they 
 were to begin Greek, and in their fifth and sixth, read Homer 
 and Hesiod. The boys were then to be admitted to the 
 " College of Philosophy " the university proper and after 
 two years' study they were eligible for the degree of bachelor, 
 the subjects of examination being dialectic, logic and morals. 
 The next year and a half was devoted to natural philosophy, 
 mathematics and metaphysics, after which they received their 
 licencia (equivalent to M.A.). Those intended for the Church 
 then proceeded to the "College of Divinity," where they studied 
 Hebrew, law and theology, expounding passages of Scripture 
 and holding disputations. This scheme of Buchanan's has 
 close affinities to the organization of the Jesuit ' colleges ' and 
 academies, the full organization of which was brought into 
 operation about the same time. 
 
 In estimating the work of the universities, we must bear in 
 mind that the want of books determined largely the method of 
 teaching. The difficulties by which the diffusion of learning 
 was beset before the invention of printing, may be gathered 
 from the historians of the period, and are well summed up in 
 the following quotation from Mr J. A. Symonds' Renaissance in 
 Italy. 
 
 "Very few of the students whom the master saw before 
 
 him possessed more than meagre portions of the text of 
 
 Virgil or of Cicero ; they had no notes, grammars, lexicons, 
 
 1 Hume Brown's vernacular writings of Buchanan (Scots Texts Society). 

 
 UNIVERSITIES 35 
 
 or dictionaries of antiquities and mythology to help them. 
 It was therefore necessary for the lecturer to dictate quota- 
 tions, to repeat parallel passages at full length, to explain 
 geographical and historical allusions, to analyse the structure 
 of sentences in detail, to provide copious illustrations of gram- 
 matical usage, to trace the stages by which a word acquired 
 its meaning in a special context, to command a full vocabulary 
 of synonyms, to give rules for orthography and to have the 
 whole Pantheon at his fingers' ends. In addition to this, he 
 was expected to comment upon the meaning of his author, 
 to interpret his philosophy, to point out the beauties of his 
 style, to introduce appropriate moral disquisition on his 
 doctrine, to sketch his biography, and to give some account 
 of his -relation to the history of his country and to his pre- 
 decessors in the field of letters. 
 
 " In short, the professor of rhetoric had to be a grammarian, 
 a philologer, an historian, a stylist and a sage in one. He was 
 obliged to pretend at least to an encyclopaedic knowledge of 
 the classics, and to retain whole volumes in his memory. All 
 these requirements, which seem to have been satisfied by such 
 men as Filelfo and Poliziano, made the Professor of Eloquence 
 for so the varied subject-matter of Humanism was often 
 called a very different business from that which occupies a 
 lecturer of the present century. Scores of students, old and 
 young, with nothing but pen and paper on the desks before 
 them, sat patiently recording what the lecturer said. At the 
 end of his discourses on the Georgia or the Verrines, each of 
 them carried away a compendious volume, containing a tran- 
 script of the author's text, together with a miscellaneous mass 
 of notes, critical, explanatory, ethical, aesthetical, historical, 
 and biographical. In other words, a book had been dictated, 
 and as many scores of copies as there were attentive pupils 
 had been made. The language used was Latin. No dialect 
 of Italian could have been intelligible to the students of 
 different nationalities who crowded the lecture-rooms. The 
 
 32
 
 36 UNIVERSITIES 
 
 elementary education in grammar requisite for following a 
 professorial course of lectures had been previously provided 
 by the teachers of the Latin schools which depended for 
 maintenance partly on the State and partly on private 
 enterprise." 
 
 Even after the invention of printing, books were scarce and 
 dear and had often to be dispensed with. Hallam {Literature 
 of Europe, chap. iv. 2, 31) says: "The process of learning 
 without books was tedious and difficult, but not impracticable 
 for the diligent. The teacher provided himself with a lexicon 
 which was in common use among his pupils and with one 
 of the grammars [he is referring to the teaching of Greek] 
 published on the Continent, from which he gave oral lectures, 
 and portions of which were transcribed by each student. The 
 books read in the lecture-room were probably copied out in 
 the same manner, the abbreviations giving some facility to a 
 cursive hand ; and thus the deficiency of impressions was 
 in some degree supplied, just as before the invention of 
 printing. The labour of acquiring knowledge strengthened, 
 as it always does, the memory ; it excited an industry which 
 surmounted every obstacle, and yielded to no fatigue; and 
 we may thus account for that copiousness of verbal learning 
 which sometimes astonishes us in the scholars of the i6th 
 century, and in which they seem to surpass the more exact 
 philologers of later ages'." Unquestionably learning without 
 books had its advantages, but without the cheapening of the 
 art of printing neither learning nor education could ever have 
 been wide-spread. 
 
 I have endeavoured very briefly to sum up the gains of the 
 Revival, in so far as it was educational, after it had hardened 
 down into formula and routine. It must be admitted that, 
 even in its narrowest conception, the curriculum of study 
 
 1 In connexion with this, see an interesting passage in Plato's Phaedrus 
 (Jowett's translation, i. p. 63).
 
 UNIVERSITIES 37 
 
 afforded materials, both in the school and the university, 
 whereby a true education might be given by capable men to 
 competent students especially after the invention of printing. 
 But materials do not themselves suffice : there can be no 
 education where there is no life, no vital intercourse of mind 
 with mind in pursuit of some ideal aim, whether that be style, 
 science, philosophy, Protestant dogma, or Catholic doctrine. 
 The fire burns out, and all that has not gone off in smoke is 
 ashes, and with these generations of youth must content them- 
 selves, except where they are re-lighted here and there by the 
 rare genius of an eminent teacher. It cannot be expected that 
 the average schoolmaster or professor should rise above the 
 spirit and methods of the age in which he lives. Great scholars, 
 jurists and theologians, were notwithstanding produced, while 
 the mass of students had now gained access to classical literature 
 and the elements of mathematics. But in the secondary school, 
 and for the ordinary boy, as for the ordinary teacher, life was 
 almost as dreary as ever. Grammar was the despot and rote- 
 memory the slave. Verbalism had again reasserted itself, though 
 now, it is true, with higher aims. The attempt to introduce real 
 studies, even history and geography, broke down. In fact, how 
 could it be otherwise? Who, or what agency was there to organize 
 the spirit of the Revival in the school domain and sustain the 
 teacher's ambition to the level which it had reached in a few 
 enthusiastic and original minds ? 
 
 After the preceding brief survey, the characteristics of the 
 Revival in education will best be studied, I think, in the 
 writings of representative men whom I proceed to speak of.
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 "THE GOVERNOUR," 
 by Sir Thomas Elyot ; d. 1546. 
 
 The Governour, by Sir Thomas Elyot, was unknown save to 
 the learned few until it was edited and reprinted by Mr Croft 
 in 1880. The writer was a lawyer, and after holding a legal 
 office for some time he was appointed by Wolsey Clerk of the 
 Council of King Henry VIII. in 1523. He died in 1546. 
 The Governour was printed 1530-31. The Institutio Principis 
 Christiani of Erasmus is referred to by him, and he is 
 indebted also to other writers (among whom I would include 
 Plutarch). 
 
 I think Elyot's book of historical importance for two reasons : 
 first because it seems to have been the first treatise in English 
 written in the spirit of the earlier Italian Humanists, and secondly 
 because it must have exercised influence on the mind of Roger 
 Ascham. It would not serve much purpose to expound the 
 whole of The Governour. I can give the reader a fair acquaint- 
 ance with its spirit and aims by stringing together its leading 
 precepts, and so letting Elyot speak for himself. Colet, I may 
 mention, died only 10 or 12 years before the publication of 
 Elyot's book, but it was only incidentally that he wrote on 
 education, although historically he was an important figure as 
 founder of the Humanistic School of St Paul's. Accordingly 
 Elyot's work may be accepted as the first full exposition of the 
 Humanistic point of view, not only in English but also in 
 England.
 
 THE GOVERNOUR 39 
 
 Early Training. 
 
 "Moreover to the nurse should be appointed another 
 woman of approved virtue, discretion, and gravity, who shall 
 not suffer, in the child's presence, to be shown any act or tache 
 (quality) dishonest or any wanton or unclean word to be spoken : 
 and for that cause all. men, except physicians only, should be 
 excluded and kept out of the nursery. Perchance some will 
 scorn me for that I am so serious, saying that there is no such 
 damage to be feared in an infant, who for tenderness of years 
 hath not the understanding to discern good from evil. And 
 yet no man will deny, but in that innocency he will discern 
 milk from butter, and bread from pap, and ere he can speak 
 he will with his hand or countenance signify which he desireth. 
 And I verily do suppose that in the brains and hearts of 
 children, which be members spiritual, whiles they be tender, 
 and the little slips of reason begin in them to burgeon, there 
 may happen by evil custom some pestiferous dew of vice to 
 pierce the said members, and infect and corrupt the soft and 
 tender buds, whereby the fruit may grow wild, and some time 
 contain in it fervent and mortal poison, to the utter destruction 
 of a realm. 
 
 "And we have in daily experience that little infants essayeth 
 to follow, not only the words, but also the facts and gesture, 
 of them that be provect (advanced) in years. For we daily hear, 
 to our great heaviness, children swear great oaths and speak 
 lascivious and unclean words, by the example of other whom 
 they hear, whereat the lewd parents do rejoice, soon after, or in 
 this world, or elsewhere, to their great pain and torment. Con- 
 trarywise, we behold some children kneeling in their games 
 before images, and holding up their little white hands, do move 
 their pretty mouths as they were praying : other going and 
 singing as it were in procession : whereby they do express their 
 disposition to the imitation of those things, be they good or evil, 
 which they usually do see or hear. Wherefore not only princes,
 
 40 THE GOVERNOUR 
 
 but also all other children, from their nurses' paps, are to be kept 
 diligently from the hearing or seeing of any vice or evil tache. 
 And incontinent as soon as they can speak, it behoveth, with 
 most pleasant allurings, to instil in them sweet manners and 
 virtuous custom. Also to provide for them such companions 
 and playfellows which shall not do in his presence any reproach- 
 able act or speak any unclean word or oath, nor to advance 
 him with flattery, remembering his nobility, or any other like 
 thing wherein he might glory : unless it be to persuade him to 
 virtue, or to withdraw him from vice, in the remembering to 
 him the danger of his evil example." 
 
 Beginnings of Latin. 
 
 " But there can be nothing more convenient than by little 
 and little to train and exercise them in speaking of Latin : 
 informing them to know first the names in Latin of all things 
 that cometh in sight, and to name all the parts of their bodies : 
 and giving them somewhat that they covet or desire, in most 
 gentle manner to teach them to ask it again in Latin. And if 
 by this means they may be induced to understand and speak 
 Latin ; it shall afterwards be less grief to them, in a manner, 
 to learn anything, where they understand the language wherein 
 it is written. And, as touching grammar, there is at this 
 day better introductions, and more facile, than ever before 
 were made, concerning as well Greek as Latin, if they be 
 wisely chosen. * * * 
 
 "And in this wise may they be instructed, without any 
 violence or enforcing : using the more part of the time, 
 until they come to the age of seven years, in such dissports as 
 do appertain to children, wherein is no resemblance or simili- 
 tude of vice." 
 
 Variety of occupation. 
 
 " The discretion of a tutor consisteth in temperance : that 
 is to say, that he suffer not the child to be fatigued with con-
 
 THE GOVERNOUR 41 
 
 tinual study or learning, wherewith the delicate and tender wit 
 may be dulled or oppressed : but that there may be therewith 
 interlaced and mixed some pleasant learning and exercise, as 
 playing on instruments of music." 
 
 Latin not to be seriously begun till the child knows his own 
 tongue. Qualification of teacher. Discipline. 
 
 "After that the child hath been pleasantly trained, and 
 induced to know the parts of speech, and can separate one of 
 them from another, in his own language, it shall then be time 
 that his tutor or governor do make diligent search for such 
 a master as is excellently learned both in Greek and Latin, 
 and therewithal is of sober and virtuous disposition, specially 
 chaste of living, and of much affability and patience : lest by 
 any unclean example the tender mind of the child may ,be 
 infected, hard afterwards to be recovered. For the natures 
 of children be not so much or soon advanced by things well 
 done or spoken, as they be hindered and corrupted by that 
 which in acts or words is wantonly expressed. Also by a 
 cruel and irous master the wits of children be dulled ; and 
 that thing for the which children be oftentimes beaten is to 
 them ever after fastidious : whereof we need no better author 
 for witness than daily experience. Wherefore the most neces- 
 sary things to be observed by a master in his disciples or 
 scholars (as Lycon, the noble grammarian, said) is shamefast- 
 ness and praise. By shamefastness, as it were with a bridle, 
 they rule as well their deeds as their appetites. And desire of 
 praise addeth a sharp spur to their disposition toward learning 
 and virtue. According thereunto Quintilian, instructing an 
 orator, desireth such a child to be given unto him, whom 
 commendation fervently stirreth, glory provoketh, and being 
 vanquished weepeth. That child (saith he) is to be fed with 
 ambition, him a little chiding sore biteth, in him no part of 
 sloth is to be feared. And if nature disposeth not^the child's
 
 42 THE GOVERNOUR 
 
 wit to receive learning, but rather otherwise, it is to be applied 
 with more diligence and also policy, as choosing some book, 
 whereof the argument or matter approacheth most nigh to the 
 child's inclination or fantasy, so that it be not extremely vicious, 
 and therewith by little and little, as it were with a pleasant 
 sauce, provoke him to have a good appetite to study." 
 
 After seven years of age the boy should learn Greek before 
 Latin, meanwhile practising Latin colloquially with his fellows 
 and masters. If this be not done, then at least the serious 
 study of both languages should be begun at the same time. 
 
 Grammar not to be too prolonged. Authors to be read as soon 
 as possible. Method : Committing to memory. 
 
 " Grammar being but an introduction to the understanding 
 of authors, if it be made too long or exquisite to the learner, it 
 in a manner mortifieth his courage : And by that time he 
 cometh to the most sweet and pleasant reading of old authors, 
 the sparks of fervent desire of learning is extinct with the 
 burden of grammar, like as a little fire is soon quenched 
 with a great heap of small sticks : so that it can never come 
 to the principal logs where it should long burn in a great 
 pleasant fire. 
 
 " Now to follow my purpose : after a few and quick rules of 
 grammar, immediately, or interlacing it therewith, would be 
 read to the child ^Esop's Fables in Greek : in which argument 
 children much do delight. And surely it is a much pleasant 
 lesson and also profitable, as well for that it is elegant and 
 brief (and notwithstanding it hath much variety in words, and 
 therewith much helpeth to the understanding of Greek), as 
 also in those fables is included much moral and politic wisdom. 
 Wherefore, in the teaching of them, the master diligently must 
 gather together those fables which may be most accommodate 
 to the advancement of some virtue, whereto he perceiveth the 
 child inclined : or to the rebuke of some vice, whereto he
 
 THE GOVERNOUR 43 
 
 findeth his nature disposed. And therein the master ought to 
 exercise his wit, as well to make the child plainly to understand 
 the fable, as also declaring the signification thereof compen- 
 diously and to the purpose, foreseen alway, that, as well this 
 lesson, as all other authors which the child shall learn, either 
 Greek or Latin, verse or prose, be perfectly had without the 
 book : whereby he shall not only attain plenty of the tongues 
 called Copie (Copia) but also increase and nourish remembrance 
 wonderfully." 
 
 Lucian, Aristophanes and Homer are next recommended 
 to Virgil, Ovid and Lucan ; considerable portions of which 
 Elyot will have the boy familiar with by the time he is 14 
 years old. Thereafter Logic (Topics), Rhetoric (Quintilian) 
 and the Orators, Greek and Latin. He strongly urges the 
 teaching of Geography and the study of Maps. Then History 
 as in Livy, Caesar, Sallust, Xenophon. Then after he is 17 
 years old the first two books of Aristotle's Ethics, Cicero's 
 De Officiis, and Plato. 
 
 Deficiencies of Schoolmasters. The true method of 
 teaching Literature. 
 
 " Lord God, how many good and clean wits of children 
 be now-a-days perished by ignorant schoolmasters. How little 
 substantial doctrine is apprehended by the fewness of good 
 grammarians. Notwithstanding I know that there be some 
 well learned, which have taught, and also do teach, but God 
 knoweth a few, and they with small effect, having thereto no 
 comfort, their aptest and most proper scholars, after they be 
 well instructed in speaking Latin, and understanding some poets, 
 being taken from their school by their parents, and either be 
 brought to the court, and made lackeys or pages, or else are 
 bound apprentices ; whereby the worship that the master, 
 above any reward, coveteth to have by the praise of his 
 scholar, is utterly drowned; whereof I have heard school-
 
 44 THE GOVERNOUR 
 
 masters, very well learned, of good right complain. But yet 
 (as I said) the fewness of good grammarians is a great impedi- 
 ment of doctrine. (And here I would the readers should mark 
 that I note to be few good grammarians, and not none.) I 
 call not them grammarians, which only can teach or make 
 rules, whereby a child shall only learn to speak congruous 
 Latin, or to make six verses standing in one foot, wherein 
 perchance shall be neither sentence nor eloquence. But I 
 name him a grammarian, by the authority of Quintilian, that 
 speaking Latin elegantly, can expound good authors, expressing 
 the invention and disposition of the matter, their style or form 
 of eloquence, explicating the figures as well of sentences as 
 words, leaving no thing, person, or place, named by the author, 
 undeclared or hidden from his scholars. Wherefore Quintilian 
 saith, it is not enough for him to have read poets, but all kinds 
 of writing must also be sought for ; not for the histories only, 
 but also for the propriety of words, which commonly do receive 
 their authority of noble authors. Moreover without music 
 grammar may not be perfect ; for as much as therein must 
 be spoken of metres and harmonies, called rythmi in Greek. 
 Neither if he have not the knowledge of stars, he may under- 
 stand poets, which in description of times (I omit other things) 
 they treat of the rising and going down of planets. Also 
 he may not be ignorant in philosophy, for many places 
 that be almost in every poet fetched out of the most subtle 
 part of natural questions. These be well nigh the words of 
 Quintilian. 
 
 " Then behold how few grammarians after this description 
 be in this realm." 
 
 His remarks on the method of teaching literature are 
 beyond all question the best ever written in so far as my 
 knowledge extends. 
 
 Elyot then goes on to advocate games, such as tennis, 
 dumb-bells, wrestling, running, swimming, fencing, riding and 
 dancing ; above all archery.
 
 THE GOVERNOUR 45 
 
 Painting and carving should be taught to boys where there 
 is any natural talent in that way. 
 
 Music also is to be taught but not indulged in to excess. 
 
 As regards discipline Elyot was much in advance of his 
 time. 
 
 Hallam {Literature of Europe, chap. vn. 2, 32) says : 
 " Elyot deprecates [as we have seen] ' cruel and irous school- 
 masters, by whom the wits of children be dulled, whereof we 
 need no better author to witness than daily experience.' All 
 testimonies concur to this savage ill-treatment of boys in the 
 schools of this period. The fierceness of the Tudor government, 
 the religious intolerance, the polemical brutality, the rigorous 
 justice, when justice it was, of our laws, seem to have en- 
 gendered a harshness of character, which displayed itself in 
 severity of discipline, when it did not even reach the point of 
 arbitrary or malignant cruelty. Everyone knows the behaviour 
 of Lady Jane Grey's parents' towards their accomplished and 
 admirable child ; the slave of their temper in her brief life, 
 the victim of their ambition in death. The story told by 
 Erasmus of Colet is also a little too trite for repetition. The 
 general fact is indubitable, and I think we may ascribe much 
 of the hypocrisy and disingenuousness which became almost 
 national characteristics in this and the first part of the next 
 century to the rigid scheme of domestic discipline so frequently 
 adopted : though I will not say but that we owe some part of 
 the firmness and power of self-command, which were equally 
 manifest in the English character, to the same cause." 
 
 Taking Elyot as a whole we find him to be a genuine 
 believer in the power of education and an admirable repre- 
 sentative in England of the fine Humanism of Da Feltre, and 
 one of the most charming writers on education that ever wrote. 
 
 1 Alluded to by Ascham in his Scholemaster.
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 RABELAIS: MONK, PHYSICIAN, CURE OF 
 MEUDON. 1483 (?) 1553. 
 
 
 
 \Note on Erasmus (page 55).] 
 
 A CONTEMPORARY of Elyot, but a man of a very different type, 
 was Rabelais. In his great satire and burlesque, the Life of the 
 Great Gargantua, we have some remarks on the education of 
 the hero and, afterwards, advice addressed by Gargantua to his 
 son Pantagruel, giving his own views of the education which 
 he wished him to receive from his tutors'. Rabelais satirizes 
 word-teaching the grammar and logic instruction of his 
 time pointing out, by producing a cultured youth of the 
 name of Eudemon (an extravagant illustration, of course, 
 like everything in Rabelais), how the ends of education might 
 be attained without the absorption of all the lumber of the 
 Schools. He gives prominence to Latin and Greek, as was 
 inevitable, because these languages contained (for the Western 
 European, at least) all learning both of the past and co- 
 temporary world : but he would direct the attention of the 
 pupils to the real instruction which these languages gave as 
 opposed to the technicalities and formalities of Logic, Rhetoric, 
 and Grammar the trivium of the Middle Ages. 
 
 1 Book i. caps. 14, 15, 21, 22, 24 ; Book II. caps. 5, 6, 18.
 
 RABELAIS 47 
 
 In these few words I believe I have summed up the chief 
 lessons which Rabelais teaches. His aim, in brief, is the 
 expansion and enrichment of the human mind as opposed to 
 the overloading of it with the subtleties and superfluous details 
 of a formal grammar, and a still more formal scholasticism. 
 This appears from the account he gives of Gargantua's own 
 education, conducted in the age of pedantry. 
 
 Gargantua's own education. 
 
 " Presently they appointed him a great sophister-doctor, 
 called Master Tubal Holofernes, who taught him his A B C 
 so well that he could say it by heart backwards ; and about 
 this he was five years and three months. Then read he to 
 him, Donat (the popular Latin Grammar for the Middle Ages), 
 Le Facet, Theodolet, and Alanus in Parabolis'. About this 
 he was thirteen years six months and two weeks. But you 
 must remark, that in the meantime he did learn to write in 
 Gothic characters, and that he wrote all his books ; for the art 
 of printing was not then in use. 
 
 "And did ordinarily carry a huge writing-case, weighing 
 about seven thousand quintals, the pen-case whereof was as big 
 and as heavy as the pillar of Enay ; and the horn was hanged 
 to it in great iron-chains, it being of the wideness to hold a ton 
 of merchandise. 
 
 " After that was read to him, the Book de Modis Significandi, 
 with the Commentaries of Hurtbise, of Fasquin, of Tropditeux, 
 of Gaulhault, of John Calf (Jehan le veau), of Billonio, of 
 Brelinguandus, and a rabble of others ; and herein he spent 
 more than eighteen years and eleven months, and was so well 
 versed therein, that to try masteries in school disputes with 
 
 1 Notes explanatory of the books used by Gargantua will be found in 
 Fran9ois Rabelais. Gedanken uber Erziehnng und Unterricht, by Dr 
 Arnstadt, Leipzig, (n. d.)
 
 48 RABELAIS 
 
 his own co-disciples he would recite it by heart backwards ; 
 and did sometimes prove on his finger-ends to his mother 
 ' Quod de Modis Significandi non erat Scientia.' Then was 
 read to him the Compost [for knowing the age of the 
 moon, etc.] on which he spent sixteen years and two months. 
 And at that very time, which was in the year 1420, his said 
 Preceptor died. 
 
 "Afterwards he got an old coughing fellow to teach him, 
 named Master Jobelin Bride, who read unto him Hugutio, 
 Hebrard's ' Graecism,' the ' Doctrinale ' [a metrical Latin 
 grammar], the 'Partes,' the 'Quid est,' the ' Supplementum, 
 Marmotretus, De Moribus in Mensa Servandis,' Seneca 'de 
 quatuor Virtutibus Cardinalibus,' ' Passavantus cum Com- 
 mento'; and 'Dormi Secure,' for the holidays, and other 
 such like stuff; by reading of which he became as wise as 
 any we have since baked in an oven." 
 
 But what was the result of all this ? " That he did profit 
 nothing ; but, which is worse, grew thereby a fool, a sot, a 
 dolt, and a blockhead." Being introduced to a youth of 
 excellent accomplishments, called Eudemon, who had followed 
 a more modern style of education intelligence instead of mere 
 technical memory having been cultivated Grandgousier there- 
 upon resolves to send his son 'to Paris, placing him under 
 Ponocrates, the tutor of the charming Eudemon. We have an 
 account of his life there, which was devoted to hard work, bodily 
 and mental. In the midst of much absurdity and grotesque ex- 
 aggeration we see that athletics, mathematics, medicine, music, 
 and the reading of classic authors, constituted his chief studies. 
 Rabelais points to the importance of method when he re- 
 presents Ponocrates, the tutor of Eudemon, as studying the 
 character and natural bent of his pupil Gargantua. He also 
 points to the value of manual work; for Gargantua and his 
 companions "did recreate themselves with bottling hay, cleav- 
 ing and sawing wood, and threshing sheaves of corn in the 
 barn. They also studied the art of painting and carving."
 
 RABELAIS 49 
 
 At a subsequent period Gargantua writes a letter of advice 
 to his own son Pantagruel, in which we find the views of 
 Rabelais further developed. Athletics, music, classical studies, 
 and the study of Nature are all included in his proposed 
 curriculum. Religious instruction is to be from the Bible 
 as opposed to both scholastic theology and ceremonialism. 
 The aim is, like that of Montaigne subsequently, to develope 
 the pupil's (mm thought. The letter is as follows : 
 ***** 
 
 "But although my deceased father, of happy memory, 
 Grandgousier, had bent his best endeavours to make me profit 
 in all perfection and political knowledge, and that my labour 
 and study was fully correspondent to, yea, went beyond his 
 desire ; nevertheless, as thou may'st well understand, the time 
 then was not so proper and fit for learning as it is at present, 
 neither had I plenty of such good masters as thou hast had : 
 for that time was darksome, obscured with clouds of ignorance, 
 and savouring a little of the infelicity and calamity of the 
 Goths, who had, wherever they set footing, destroyed all good 
 literature, which in my age hath by the divine goodness been 
 restored unto its former light and dignity, and that with such 
 amendment and increase of knowledge, that now hardly should 
 I be admitted with the first form of the little Grammar school- 
 boys : I say, I, who in my school-days was (and that justly) 
 reputed the most learned of that age. Which I do not speak 
 in vain-boasting. 
 
 ***** 
 
 "Now it is that the minds of men are qualified with all 
 manner of discipline, and the old sciences revived, which for 
 many ages were extinct : now it is, that the learned languages 
 are to their pristine purity restored, viz. Greek (without which 
 a man may be ashamed to account himself a scholar), Hebrew, 
 Arabic, Chaldean, and Latin. Printing likewise is now in use, 
 so elegant, and so correct, that better cannot be imagined, 
 although it was found out in my time but by divine inspiration ; 
 L. 4
 
 50 RABELAIS 
 
 as by a diabolical suggestion, on the other side, was the in- 
 vention of ordnance. All the world is full of knowing men, of 
 most learned school-masters, and vast libraries ; and it appears 
 to me as a truth, that neither in Plato's time, nor Cicero's, 
 nor Papinian's, there was ever such conveniency for studying, 
 as we see at this day there is. Nor must any adventure hence- 
 forward to come in public, or represent himself in company, 
 that hath not been pretty well polished in the shop of Minerva. 
 I see robbers, hangmen, free-booters, tapsters, ostlers, and such 
 like, of the very rubbish of the people, more learned now, than 
 the doctors and preachers were in my time. 
 
 " What shall I say ? The very women and children have 
 aspired to this praise and celestial manna of good learning ; 
 yet so it is, that at the age I am now of, I have been con- 
 strained to learn the Greek tongue which I contemned not 
 like Cato, but had not the leisure in my younger years to 
 attend the study of it. And I take much delight in the 
 reading of Plutarch's morals, the pleasant dialogues of Plato, 
 the monuments of Pausanias, and the antiquities of Athenaeus, 
 whilst I w r ait the hour wherein God my Creator shall call me, 
 and command me to depart from this earth and transitory 
 pilgrimage. Wherefore, my son, I admonish thee to employ 
 thy youth to profit as well as thou canst, both in thy studies 
 and in virtue. Thou art at Paris, where the laudable examples 
 of many brave men may stir up thy mind to many gallant 
 actions ; and hast likewise for thy tutor the learned Epistemon, 
 who by his lively and vocal documents may instruct thee in 
 the arts and sciences. 
 
 " I intend, and will have it so, that thou leam the languages 
 perfectly. First of all, the Greek, as Quintilian will have it; 
 secondly the Latin ; and then the Hebrew, for the holy 
 Scripture's sake. And then the Chaldee and Arabic likewise. 
 And that thou frame thy style in Greek, in imitation of Plato ; 
 and for the Latin, after Cicero. Let there be no history which 
 thou shall not have ready in thy memory ; and to help thee
 
 RABELAIS 5 1 
 
 therein, the books of cosmography will be very conducible. 
 Of the liberal arts of geometry, arithmetic, and music, I gave 
 thee some taste when thou wert yet little, and not above five 
 or six years old ; proceed further in them and learn the 
 remainder if thou canst. As for astronomy, study all the 
 rules thereof: let pass nevertheless the divining and judicial 
 astrology, and the art of Lullius, as being nothing else but 
 plain cheats and vanities. As for the civil law, of that I would 
 have thee to know the texts by heart, and then to compare 
 them with Philosophy. 
 
 " Now in matter of the knowledge of the works of nature, 
 I would have thee to study that exactly ; so that there be no 
 sea, river or fountain, of which thou dost not know the fishes ; 
 all the fowls of the air; all the several kinds of shrubs and 
 trees, whether in forest or orchard ; all the sorts of herbs and 
 flowers that grow upon the ground ; all the various metals that 
 are hid within the bowels of the earth ; together with all the 
 diversity of precious stones that are to be seen in the orient 
 and south parts of the world; let nothing of all these be 
 hidden from thee. Then fail not most carefully to peruse the 
 books of the great Arabian and Latin physicians : not despising 
 the Talmudists and Cabalists ; and by frequent anatomies get 
 thee the perfect knowledge of the microcosm, which is man. 
 And at some hours of the day apply thy mind to the study of 
 the holy Scriptures : first in Greek, the New Testament with 
 the Epistles of the Apostles ; and then the Old Testament, in 
 Hebrew. In brief, let me see thee an abyss and bottomless 
 pit of knowledge : for from henceforward, as thou growest great 
 and becomest a man, thou must part from this tranquillity and 
 rest of study; thou must" learn chivalry, warfare, and the 
 exercise of the field, the better thereby to defend our house 
 and our friends and to succour and protect them at all their 
 needs against the invasion and assaults of evil-doers. 
 
 " Furthermore I will that very shortly thou try how much 
 thou hast profited, which thou canst not better do than by 
 
 42
 
 52 RABELAIS 
 
 maintaining publicly theses and conclusions in all arts, against 
 all persons whatsoever, and by haunting the company of 
 learned men, both at Paris and otherwhere. But because, 
 as the wise man Solomon saith, wisdom entereth not into a 
 malicious mind and that science without conscience is but 
 the ruin of the soul ; it behoveth thee to serve, to love, to fear 
 God, and on Him to cast all thy thoughts and all thy hope, 
 and by faith formed in charity, to cleave unto Him so that 
 thou may'st never be separated from Him by thy sins. Suspect 
 the abuses of the world ; set not thy heart upon vanity, for this 
 life is transitory ; but the word of the Lord endureth for ever. 
 Be serviceable to all thy neighbours, and love them as thyself; 
 reverence thy preceptors; shun the conversation of those wnom 
 thou desirest not to resemble, and receive not in vain the 
 graces that God hath bestowed upon thee. And when thou 
 shall see that thou hast attained all the knowledge that is to 
 be acquired in that part, return unto me, that I may see thee 
 and give thee my blessing before I die. My son, the peace 
 and grace of our Lord be with thee. Amen. 
 
 Thy father, 
 
 GARGANTUA. 
 FROM UTOPIA, 
 
 the i-]th day of the month of March." 
 
 There is in this letter much extravagance, and it is 
 to be presumed that Rabelais did not regard his whole 
 scheme as practicable, while yet holding to its main purport. 
 If we collate this letter with Gargantua's own education in 
 Paris, the opinions of Rabelais on education may be summed 
 up as follows : He was bitterly opposed to the grammatical 
 and scholastic studies of his time, and had a wholesome dislike 
 of commentators and critics. He accepted to the full the 
 teaching of the Humanistic revival and desired to send the 
 pupil direct to the works of great writers, and away from futile
 
 RABELAIS 53 
 
 rhetorical rules and empty dialectic. In truth, Rabelais, like 
 Montaigne and all educational reformers, felt with Cleanthes, 
 the philosopher, who, looking back on a better time, says 
 " tune quidem ipsa res exercebatur, nunc autem verba solum." 
 He certainly inculcates the study of languages ; but this not for 
 the sake of languages, but merely because in no other way 
 could the treasures of literature be reached. He urges also 
 the study of science, and commends personal contact with 
 nature. In general, he sees the importance of instruction 
 through the senses and advocates a wide range of realistic 
 study. 
 
 Attention to the body and to personal habits, and a good 
 bearing, are also important in Rabelais' eyes. He keeps in 
 view a good, useful and becoming life as the practical end of 
 all education. 
 
 It seems to me absurd to call Rabelais a ' realist ' because 
 he holds these views. His aim is an intellectual and 
 moral one, and for the attainment of this he recommends the 
 humanistic instruments. If he seems to dwell on the import- 
 ance of a wide and encyclopaedic knowledge of things, it has 
 to be remembered that he was led to exaggerate this aspect of 
 education through his antagonism to grammarians and school- 
 men, and their useless burdening and choking both of the 
 intellect and memories of their pupils with the mere dead 
 forms, grammatical, rhetorical, and logical, of true knowledge. 
 He was no more a realist than Montaigne, who was twenty 
 years old when Rabelais died, and who advocated the views of 
 his precursor at greater length, with a more penetrating insight, 
 and in a more genial, gentle, and rational spirit. With Mon- 
 taigne the end of education was summed up in the word 
 ' philosophy,' by which he meant wisdom and the conduct of 
 life. A similar aim unquestionably runs through Rabelais/ 
 teaching. The real was opposed to the formal throughout. 
 Religion, again, was with him simple, pure, practical: more nearly 
 allied to the Protestant than the Roman Catholic conception
 
 
 54 RABELAIS 
 
 of the religious life. Both Rabelais and Montaigne alike were, 
 I hold, Humanists, not Realists, although they naturally 
 emphasized the knowledge of things, because (as I have already 
 said) of the time in which they lived and the special evils they 
 had to combat. No one will hesitate to give Rabelais the 
 credit of having recalled attention to the study of Nature and 
 to the poetic enjoyment of it, as elements in the education of 
 a man. But this does not make him a Sense-Realist. 
 
 The importance of Physical Training was also first, in 
 modern times, urged by Rabelais, although it had already 
 received practical attention from leading Renaissance school- 
 masters. And when the weather will not admit of outdoor 
 athletics, he makes Gargantua give himself to indoor manual 
 occupation. In truth, there is a great deal in Rabelais brief 
 as his treatment of the subject is. 
 
 The large and liberal curriculum contemplated, including 
 gymnastic and military training as well as music, suggests that 
 Milton's Tractate owed not a little to Rabelais, as did also 
 Locke's Thoughts through the mediation of Montaigne. 
 
 I would direct your attention to this : the further we extend 
 our study of writers on Education, the more are we struck with 
 the substantial unity of opinion and object among the greatest 
 of them. Rabelais and Montaigne would have subscribed to 
 almost every word of the early Italian Humanists, and these 
 Humanists, again, reproduced Quintilian. All alike have 
 always before them, as the outcome of all sound teaching, a 
 self-active, living mind. " Accendere animos" is the aim. 
 Plutarch reminds us that the soul is not a vessel to fill, but a 
 hearth on which to kindle a fire. And if the intellectual aim 
 is always the same with the best writers, so even still more are 
 they at one on the supreme importance of moral education and 
 the value of gymnastic. 
 
 It is with the rise of the Baconian school that a new idea 
 enters. It is, then, chiefly by acquiring that man is to be
 
 ERASMUS 55 
 
 educated. Knowledge takes the place of wisdom, moral precepts 
 of moral training and personal discipline. This is what is com- 
 monly meant by Realism. But even with Ratke and Comenius 
 and their numerous followers, the ultimate purpose is the same 
 as with other writers, viz. wisdom and virtue ; but they ex- 
 aggerate the value of mere instruction as insuring these. The 
 contribution to the science of education made by the Baconian 
 school is not so much in the attention they gave to sense-realism 
 as in the department of method. Locke's Thoughts will be 
 found to be a wise mixture of the Baconian views and of 
 Montaigne. In the Conduct of the Understanding, however, 
 the discipline of the intellect is the theme ; and that valuable 
 treatise virtually, in my opinion, restores the grammar and 
 dialectic of the Middle Ages, but these based on the vernacular 
 and on the analysis of concrete writings by the pupil, and not 
 to be attained by the study of formal grammars and logics. 
 
 NOTE ON ERASMUS; b. 1466, d. 1536. 
 
 Erasmus was the most brilliant man of the second period of the 
 Revival. I have not had time to study all he has said on Education, 
 and I consequently content myself with this note. 
 
 The educational programme of this eminent scholar and thinker 
 was that of the Italian Humanists : Return to the ancients ; 
 classical tongues to be studied in the sources, and no longer in 
 barbarous manuals ; rhetorical exercises to be substituted for use- 
 less and obscure dialectic ; the study of nature to animate and 
 vivify literary studies ; the largest possible diffusion of human 
 knowledge without distinction of age or sex 1 . He severely criticised 
 universities as the homes of mediaeval barbarism and obscurantism, 
 and he advocated strongly a milder discipline in all schools, and 
 cheerful and sanitary class-rooms. 
 
 There can be little doubt that Ascham was as largely influenced 
 by Erasmus as by Quintilian. It is superfluous to say that school- 
 
 1 Buisson's Dictionnairc de Pedagogie.
 
 56 ERASMUS 
 
 masters listened to neither the one nor the other. Even in these 
 days we see that the tendency of the majority of secondary school- 
 masters is to look with all the suspicion which ignorance engenders 
 on all serious study of the principles, aims, and methods of the work 
 to which they have devoted their lives. Some have however 
 advanced far enough to write sentimentally and prettily about it. 
 The most important educational works of Erasmus, apart from his 
 Adages and Colloquies, were the following. [In what follows, I quote 
 from Payne's translation of Compayre"'s History of Pedagogy.] 
 
 Educational Works of Erasmus. 
 
 In his book, On the Order of Study (De Ratione Studii\ he 
 seeks out the rules for instruction in literature, for the study of 
 grammar, for the cultivation of the memory, and for the explication 
 of the Greek and Latin authors. Another treatise, entitled Of the 
 First Liberal Education of Children (De Pueris statim ac liber aliter 
 instituendis], is still more important, and covers the whole field 
 of education. Erasmus here studies the character of the child, 
 the question of knowing whether the first years of child-life can 
 be turned to good account, and the measures that are to be taken 
 with early life. He also recommends methods that are attractive, 
 and heartily condemns the barbarous discipline which reigned in 
 the schools of his time. 
 
 Erasmus is one of the first educators who comprehended the 
 importance of politeness. In an age still uncouth, when the 
 manners of even the cultivated classes tolerated usages that the 
 most ignorant rustic of to-day would scorn, it was good to call the 
 attention to outward appearances and the social value of politeness. 
 Erasmus knew perfectly well that politeness has a moral side, that 
 it is not a matter of pure convention, but that it proceeds from the 
 inner disposition of a well-ordered soul. So he assigns it an 
 important place in education. 
 
 The Instruction of Women was advocated by Erasmus. The 
 scholars of the Renaissance generally did not exclude women from 
 all participation in the literary treasures that a recovered antiquity 
 had disclosed to themselves. Erasmus admits them to an equal 
 share.
 
 ERASMUS 57 
 
 In the Colloquy of the Abbe and the Educated Woman, Magdala 
 claims for herself the right to learn Latin, " so that she may hold 
 converse each day with so many authors who are so eloquent, so 
 instructive, so wise, and such good counsellors." In the book called 
 Christian Marriage, Erasmus banters young ladies who learn only 
 to make a bow, to hold the hands crossed, to bite their lips when 
 they laugh, to eat and drink as little as possible at table, after 
 having taken ample portions in private. More ambitious for the 
 wife, Erasmus recommends her to pursue the studies which will 
 assist her in educating her own children, and in taking part in the 
 intellectual life of her husband 1 . 
 
 1 Ludovicus Vives, a contemporary of Erasmus (1492-1540), a Spanish 
 writer of great eminence, expressed similar ideas on the education of 
 women. He recommends young women to read Plato and Seneca.
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 1 ; 
 
 b. 1515, d. 1568. 
 
 THE leading topic of Ascham's Scholemastcr is the classical 
 languages and literatures as instruments of the education 
 of youth. Mulcaster and Brinsley were the first to advocate 
 the teaching of English 2 . 
 
 " Roger Ascham," says Thomas Fuller, " was born at 
 Kirkby-weik in this County (Yorkshire) ; and bred in Saint 
 John's Colledge in Cambridge, under Doctor Medcalfe, that 
 good Governour, who, whet-stone-like, though dull in himself, 
 by his encouragement, set an edge on most excellent wits 
 in that foundation. Indeed Ascham came to Cambridge 
 just at the dawning of Learning, and staid therein till the 
 bright-day thereof, his own endeavours contributing much 
 light thereunto. He was Oratour and Greek Professour 
 in the University (places of some sympathy, which have 
 often met in the same person) ; and in the beginning of the 
 Raign of Queen Mary, within three days, wrote letters to 
 fourty-seven severall Princes, whereof the meanest was a 
 Cardinal. He travailed into Germany, and there contracted 
 familiarity with John Sturmius and other learned men ; and, 
 
 1 The quotations which follow are from Bennet's quarto edition, 1761. 
 
 2 There is a great deal of interesting information on the pre- Reformation 
 schools in Furnivall's Education in Early England.
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 59 
 
 after his return, was a kind of teacher to the Lady Elizabeth, to 
 whom (after she was Queen} he became her Secretary for her 
 Latine letters. 
 
 "In a word, he was an honest man and a good shooter; 
 Archery (whereof he wrote a Book called ' Too<i\os ') being 
 his onely exercise in his youth, which in his old age he exchanged 
 for a worse pastime, neither so healthfidl for his body, nor 
 profitable for his purse, I mean Cock-fighting, and thereby (being 
 neither greedy to get, nor carefull to keep money) he much 
 impaired his estate. 
 
 " He had a facile and fluent Latine-style (not like those 
 who, counting obscurity to be elegancy, weed out all the hard 
 words they meet in Authors) : witness his ' Epistles,' which 
 some say are the only Latine-ones extant of any Englishman, 
 and if so, the more the pity. What loads have we of Letters 
 from Forraign Pens, as if no Author were compleat without 
 those necessary appurtenances ! whilst surely our English-men 
 write (though not so many) as good as any other Nation. In 
 a word, his ' Tod<iAos ' is accounted a good Book for young 
 men, his ' School-master ' for old men, his ' Epistles ' for all men, 
 set out after his death, which happened Anno Domini 1568," 
 in the 53rd year of his age. He was buried in St Sepulchre's, 
 London. 
 
 To the above nervous and concise statement I may add 
 that Ascham was privately educated in the family of Mr 
 Anthony Wingfield, entered St John's College, Cambridge, 
 in 1530, and took his bachelor's degree in 1534. 
 
 At the University he took with ardour to the new learning 
 and while yet a boy himself instructed others in Greek with a 
 view to his own perfect mastery of the language. Mr Pember, 
 a man of some contemporary eminence, had assured him in 
 a letter that he would gain more knowledge by explaining one 
 of Aesop's Fables to a boy than by hearing one of Homer's 
 poems explained by another. 
 
 Being elected to a Fellowship he began to take pupils and
 
 6O ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 was soon highly esteemed as a teacher of Greek and became 
 by appointment University Lecturer in that language. 
 
 As a writer of Latin he was eminent. All the University 
 letters were written by him in his official capacity of Public 
 Orator. He excelled also in the art of penmanship. He 
 was appointed to succeed Sir J. Cheke, who probably more 
 than any other one man had promoted the study of Greek 
 literature in Cambridge. He did so not by talking about it, 
 but by reading Greek authors with select pupils, going over a 
 large amount of ground. Being of a delicate constitution and 
 unable to sustain prolonged exertion of mind Ascham took to 
 archery as a recreation ; and partly as a defence of his practice he 
 published a book on Archery called " Toxophilus or the School 
 and Partitions of shooting contained in two books written by 
 Roger Ascham 1544. Pleasant for all gentlemen and yeomen 
 of England, for their pastime to read, and profitable for their 
 use to follow both in war and peace." 
 
 In writing from Brussels in 1553 to Cecil he defends his 
 practice of archery at the same time that he indicates that 
 he has given it up. " Yet," he says, " I do amiss to dislike 
 shooting too much which hath hitherto been my best friend ; 
 and even now looking back to the pleasure which I found in 
 it and perceiving small repentance to follow after it, by Plato's 
 judgment I may think well of it. No, it never called me to go 
 from my book, but it made both wit the lustier and will the 
 readier to run to it again. And perchance going back 
 sometime from learning may serve even as well as it doth 
 at leaping to pass some of those which keep always thus 
 standing at their books ; besides that seeking company and 
 experience of men's manners abroad is a fit remedy for the 
 sore wherewith learned men (many say) be much infected 
 withal which is 'the best learned not always the wisest.'" 
 
 In 1548 Ascham was called to Court to superintend the 
 studies of the Princess Elizabeth. 
 
 Being appointed secretary to an English Embassy to
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 6 1 
 
 Germany, he spent nearly three years in various parts of the 
 continent of Europe and wrote his Report and discourse of 
 the affairs in Germany. When at Strassburg he visited the 
 celebrated Rector of the Gymnasium there, John Sturmius, 
 with whom he had maintained a correspondence, but much 
 to his regret found him from home. 
 
 It was on his return to England that he served as Latin 
 Secretary at Court under Edward, Philip and Mary, and Queen 
 Elizabeth successively. 
 
 The most important of his writings, The Sc/wlemaster, was not 
 published till after his death. 
 
 Notwithstanding somewhat straitened circumstances Ascham 
 married on the ist June, 1554. He seems to have been 
 happy in his marriage. In a quaintly expressed letter to 
 Mr W. Pawlett, he says, " God, I thank him, hath given me 
 such an one as the less she seeth I do for her the more loving 
 in all causes she is to me, when I again have rather wished her 
 well than done her good : and therefore the more glad she is to 
 bear my fortune with me the more sorry am I that hitherto she 
 hath found rather a loving than a lucky husband unto her. 
 I did choose her to live withal, not hers to live upon, and if 
 my choice were to choose again I would even do as 
 I did." 
 
 Also in a letter to Sturm he says : 
 
 " I have such a wife as John Sturm would willingly desire 
 for his Roger Ascham. Her name is Margaret, and I was 
 married on the ist of June, whatever of joyful omen may be in 
 that name and that day." 
 
 Ascham, we may see, was not merely a man of great 
 learning but also a man of the world and of affairs, and this 
 adds to the weight of his opinions. 
 
 The men who in England were not only most conspicuous, 
 but also most eminent, as representatives of the revival in all 
 strictly educational matters, were Dean Colet, Cheke, and 
 Ascham. The first-named founded St Paul's School, and,
 
 62 ROGER ASCIIAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 with the help of Lilly, made it a kind of normal school, as 
 it were, for all England. They both shared the Humanism 
 of their friend Erasmus, but they possessed more definite 
 Christian conviction and religious purpose than he did. On 
 the other hand, they were not dominated by the theological 
 (as distinct from the Christian) spirit so prevalent among many 
 of the Reformers on the continent of Europe, especially those 
 who lived in the latter half of the sixteenth century. They 
 exhibited, in truth, that example of moderation in opinion 
 and action which, until very recent times at least, has always 
 characterized the reformed Church of England. Ascham lays 
 very little stress on theology; indeed, he seems to me rather 
 to evade the subject. I regard him as a pure Humanist. 
 Colet and his friends belong to the school of Melanchthon ; 
 Ascham more to the school of Erasmus, but with a genuine 
 clear, sound and specifically English vein in him. 
 
 What is Humanism in education ? It is, when largely 
 interpreted, the formation of the mind of youth omnibus 
 artibus quae ad hmnanitatem pertinent. In its more restricted 
 meaning, as understood in the first revival of letters, it is the 
 formation of the human mind by literature, as opposed to 
 the study of barren words, abstract rules, grammar, rhetorical 
 technicalities, logical sophisticalities, and bald epitomes, all 
 expressed, by master and pupil alike, in barbarous Latinity. 
 It is also the study of style or the beautiful in expression, and 
 this by the perusal of the great writers who express themselves 
 beautifully. At the time of the revival there were (with the 
 single exception of Italian) only two languages known to 
 Europe which, to any large extent at least, exhibited per- 
 fection of style, whether in prose or poetry, Greek and Latin. 
 But Latin being the indispensable and universal language 
 of the time, it was Latin literature that had to be chiefly 
 cultivated. Terence, Ovid, Caesar, Virgil, Cicero, constituted 
 the substance of education in the eyes of the Humanists, 
 because they were the best available models of the artistic 
 expression of human thought on human things. Observe that
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 63 
 
 I say human thought; for the Humanists, though apparently 
 aiming mainly at education in style, considered that they 
 were thus giving education in 'humane' things the sub- 
 stance, as well as artistic form, of Literature through which 
 the highest culture of the man was alone possible. Humane 
 letters, the humanities, did not really mean merely style or 
 rhetoric, but the free unencumbered thought of reason on 
 nature and man. It is true that the Humanists emphasized 
 mere style as such, but this arose from the fact that their 
 movement was a reaction against bald and hard grammaticism, 
 barbarous uncouth language, and monkish notions. They 
 truly hated mere words quite as much as the modern sense- 
 realists. They were themselves Realists; but their realism was 
 the realism which sought for the things of reason and imagina- 
 tion, the product of mind which underlies words. That the 
 truest thought and beauty, or at least fitness, of expression, 
 went together, was in those days simply a fact ; and if we do 
 not limit our definition of beauty too narrowly, it is probably 
 still the fact. " Away, then, they said, with grammatical abstrac- 
 tions, with barbarous Latin and logical futilities that mere 
 ' agitation of wit,' as Bacon calls it, by which the schoolmen 
 lived, and give us literary form, and with literary form true 
 literary substance. This is the proper milk for the growing 
 mind, this is the proper strong meat for the matured ! " 
 
 In sum, the Humanists went back to Quintilian ; and the 
 " good orator " as conceived by the Roman was the aim of the 
 new scholastic method. The correctness of this explanation of 
 the humanistic attitude to the school might be established by 
 citing many writers, were this the place to do so ; but, as I am 
 here speaking of Ascham, I shall confine myself to quoting a 
 passage from his chapter on " Imitation," as illustrating and 
 confirming what I have said a passage all the more worthy 
 of quotation that it exhibits well the trenchancy and amusing 
 vigour of his style. Speaking of the connexion between 
 language and thought, he says
 
 64 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 " We find always wisdom and eloquence, good matter and 
 good utterance, never, or seldom, asunder. For all such 
 authors as be fullest of good matter and right judgment in 
 doctrine be likewise always most proper in words, most apt in 
 sentence, most plain and pure in uttering the same. 
 
 "And contrariwise in those two tongues, all writers, either 
 in religion or any sect of philosophy, whosoever be found fond 
 in judgment of matter be commonly found as rude in uttering 
 their minds. For stoics, anabaptists, and friars, with epicures, 
 libertines, and monks, being most like in learning and life, are 
 no fonder and more pernicious in their opinions than they be 
 rude and barbarous in their writings. They be not wise, 
 therefore, that say, 'What care I for a man's words and 
 utterance, if his matter and reasons be good?' Such men 
 say so, not so much of ignorance as either in some singular 
 pride in themselves, or some special malice of others, or some 
 private and partial matter, either in religion, or other kind of 
 learning. For good and choice meats be no more requisite 
 for healthy bodies than proper and apt words be for good 
 matters; and also plain and sensible utterance for the best 
 and deepest reasonings ; in which two points standeth perfect 
 eloquence, one of the fairest and rarest gifts that God doth 
 give to man. 
 
 "Ye know not what hurt ye do to learning that care not 
 for words, but for matter, and so make a divorce between the 
 tongue and the heart. For mark all ages, look upon the whole 
 course of both the Greek and Latin tongues, and ye shall surely 
 find that, when apt and good words began to be neglected, and 
 properties of those two tongues to be confounded, then also 
 began ill deeds to spring; strange matters to oppress good 
 orders ; new and fond opinions to strive with old and true 
 doctrine, first in philosophy and after in religion ; right judg- 
 ment of all things to be perverted, and so virtue with learning 
 is contemned, and study left off. Of ill thoughts cometh 
 perverse judgment, of ill deeds springeth lewd talk ; which
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 65 
 
 four mis-orders, as they mar man's life, so destroy they good 
 learning withal. But behold the goodness of God's providence 
 for learning; all old authors and sects of philosophy which 
 were fondest in opinion and rudest in utterance, as stoics and 
 epicures, first contemned of wise men, and then forgotten of 
 all men, be so consumed by time, as they be now not only out 
 of use, but also out of memory of man. Which thing, I surely 
 think, will shortly chance to the whole doctrine, and all the 
 books of phantastical anabaptists and friars, and of the beastly 
 libertines and monks 1 ." 
 
 Literary art, or the beautiful in expression, then, was the 
 humanistic aim ; and with it, as an inevitable concomitant, 
 the highest and best thought on things human. Even in the 
 teaching of formal rhetoric and logic, which still constituted 
 the higher part of the curriculum of youth, the realism of 
 the Humanists led them to prefer the analysis of rhetorical 
 pieces, and the exhibition of the logical sequence of great 
 literary efforts, to abstract rules of logic or rhetoric. When 
 "Master Cheke" read Greek with Ascham and others in 
 Cambridge, he read author after author. He did not stop to 
 dwell on particles, or to write Greek iambics. He, and men 
 like him, preferred the reality to the mere naming of things, the 
 material to the formal in the abstract sense of the term, though 
 ardent students themselves of perfect form in the aesthetic sense. 
 
 Hence, too, the importance the Humanists assigned to the 
 study of the characteristics of the various writers of antiquity. 
 Criticism was revived. Most know the admirable summary of 
 literary history in Quintilian's tenth book. We find in Ascham, 
 in his chapter on "Imitation," to which I have already referred, 
 an equally admirable review, and the student will do well to 
 read both and observe in what respects great writers differed 
 in handling the same subject. An admirable discipline of 
 mind this. Language is so bound up with thought, that in 
 
 1 My quotations are from the large paper quarto ed. of James Bennet, 
 1761. The best ed. is that of Giles, 1865. 
 
 L. C
 
 66 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 teaching language in this critical way, we teach thought and 
 literary appreciation. In criticism, it is not rules of criticism, 
 opinions about authors, to which the student is directed by 
 Ascham, but to the authors themselves. Here, again, the 
 Humanistic Realism shows itself. 
 
 Unfortunately, ere long the substance of literature disap- 
 peared from the humanistic curriculum : mere style or form, and 
 Ciceronian imitation, became the aim ; and then, finally, alas ! 
 grammar, although in a less offensive form than in previous 
 generations and freed from dialectic, reasserted itself. This 
 degeneracy characterized all higher education till quite recently, 
 and still indeed survives. 
 
 Ascham wishes it to be distinctly understood that he is not 
 dealing with the question of education in general (as did Elyot, 
 Rabelais and Montaigne) but of school education. He takes the 
 subject up from the day on which a boy enters the grammar 
 school seven years of age ; and the title of his book, The 
 Scholemaster, indicates his self-imposed limitation. And yet, 
 as we shall see, he cannot escape the larger questions. 
 
 Ascham's object is to show what a literary or humanistic 
 training truly is, and how it should be set about. It was of course 
 inevitable that he should first deal with the acquisition of the 
 language which was to be the vehicle of the training, viz. Latin; 
 what applied to Latin applied, mutatis mutandis, to Greek. 
 While giving his conclusions as to language-teaching, he always, 
 however, has in his thought the great humanistic purpose of all 
 school instruction. His almost exclusive attention to Latin is 
 explained by the fact that Greek was only beginning to claim 
 attention in the secondary schools, and seems to have been 
 first taught in Colet's school at St Paul's. Few, even in the 
 universities, yet studied Greek, few but ardent ; and these were 
 looked upon with suspicion as innovators and heretics '. 
 
 I. METHOD OF TEACHING AND LEARNING LATIN. After 
 
 1 Even elegant Latinity was suspected at Rome. (Pattison's Life of 
 Casaubon.)
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 67 
 
 learning the parts of speech that is to say, what we now call 
 the accidence and being exercised in the joining together of 
 adjectives and nouns, nouns and verbs, and the relative with 
 its antecedent, the pupil should not be introduced at once, as 
 was the then custom, to Latin composition, because he has not 
 yet the materials, and the result is that wrong words, wrong 
 turns and order in the sentences swarm, and the boy acquires 
 bad habits in Latinity which are never afterwards uprooted. 
 Besides, nothing more discourages children, "dulls their wits, 
 and takes away their will from learning, than the care they have 
 to satisfy their masters in making of Latines." 
 
 The proper way to proceed is this: Let the "master read tQ 
 his pupils the Epistles of Cicero, gathered together and chosen 
 out by Sturmius for the capacity of children. 
 
 " First, let him teach the child cheerfully and plainly, the 
 cause and matter of the letter; then let him construe it into 
 English so oft as the child may easily carry away the understand- 
 ing of it; 1 lastly, parse it over perfectly. This done thus, let the 
 child, by-and-by, both construe and parse it over again; so that 
 it may appear the child doubteth in nothing that his master 
 taught him before. After this, the child must take a paper 
 book, and sitting in some place where no man shall prompt 
 him, by himself, let him translate into English his former 
 lesson. Then, showing it to his master, let the master take 
 from him his Latin book, and pausing an hour at the least, 
 then let the child translate his own English into Latin again in 
 another paper book. When the child bringeth it, turned into 
 Latin, the master must compare it with Tullie's book, and lay 
 them both together ; and where the child doth well, either in 
 choosing or true placing of Tullie's words, let the master praise 
 him and say, ' Here do ye well.' For I assure you, there is no f / 
 such whetstone to sharpen a good wit, and encourage a will to 
 learning, as is praise" (p. 200). 
 
 ***** 
 
 1 Ratke also advocated this plan. 
 
 52
 
 68 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 "In these few lines I have wrapped up the most tedious 
 part of grammar, and also the ground of almost all the rules 
 that are so busily taught by the master, and so hardly learned 
 by the scholar in all common schools; which after this sort the 
 master shall teach without all error, and the scholar shall learn 
 without great pain, the master being led by so sure a guide, 
 and the scholar being brought into so plain and easy a way. 
 And therefore we do not contemn rules, but we gladly teach 
 rules ; and teach them more plainly, sensibly, and orderly than 
 they be commonly taught in common schools. For when the 
 master shall compare Tullie's book with his scholar's translation, 
 let the master at the first lead and teach his scholar to join the 
 rules of his grammar-book with the examples of his present 
 lesson, until the scholar, by himself, be able to fetch out of his 
 grammar every rule for every example ; so as the grammar- 
 book be ever in the scholar's hand, and also used of him as a 
 dictionary for every present use. This is a lively and perfect 
 way of teaching of rules ; where the common way, used in 
 common schools, to read the grammar alone by itself is tedious 
 for the master, hard for the scholar, cold and uncomfortable 
 for them both" (p. 201). 
 
 ***** 
 
 "All this while, by mine advice, the child shall use to speak 
 no Latin ; for, as Cicero saith in like matter, with like words, 
 ' Loquendo, male loqui discunt.' And that excellent learned 
 man, G. Budaeus, in his Greek commentaries, sore complaineth 
 that, when he began to learn the Latin tongue, use of speaking 
 Latin at the table and elsewhere, unadvisedly, did bring him 
 to such an evil choice of words, to such a crooked framing of 
 sentences, that no one thing did hurt or hinder him more, all 
 the days of his life afterwards, both for readiness in speaking, 
 and also good judgment in writing 1 " (p. 202). 
 
 As you will see, the pupil is to have two paper books, the 
 
 1 Muretus, the celebrated humanistic Ciceronian Latinist, always declined 
 to speak Latin.
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 69 
 
 one for translation from Latin into English, the other for re- 
 translation from English into Latin. 
 
 When he begins to show some facility in these two 
 exercises, the master will begin to call his attention to those 
 words which, though like, have diverse shades of meaning, to 
 words which are synonymous, to phrases, to idioms, and require 
 him to open a third paper book for the recording of these, the 
 pupil classifying what he records under the proper heads. 
 This should be done first with the Ciceronian Epistles, and 
 then he should be introduced to the simpler orations, such as 
 Pro Archia Poeta, and Pro Lege Manilla etc. ; and the 
 continuance of exercises in Cicero "shall work such a right 
 choice of words, so straight a framing of sentences, such a true 
 judgment, both to write skilfully and speak wittily as wise men 
 shall both praise and marvel at." 
 
 After the pupil has been for some time exercised as above, 
 then read daily with him the third book of Epistles as selected 
 by Sturmius, the De Amiritia, and De Senectute, and also 
 some comedy of Terence or Plautus. Caesar's Commentaries 
 also should be read, " wherein is seen the unspotted propriety 
 of the Latin tongue " ; and the speeches of Livy. 
 
 It is not necessary at this stage that the pupil should write 
 translations daily. It is sufficient if he construe orally and be 
 examined in the parsing. But the teacher himself, every 
 second or third day, " should choose some epistle ad Atticum, 
 some notable commonplace out of his orations or some other 
 part of Tullie, by his discretion, which the scholar may not 
 know where to find, and translate it himself into plain, natural 
 English ; and then give it to the scholar to translate into Latin 
 again, allowing him good space and time to do it both with 
 diligent heed and good advisement." When the scholar brings 
 up his exercise, bring out the Tullie, and compare the work of 
 the pupil with the original, sentence by sentence, word by word, 
 " commend his good choice and right placing of words ; show 
 his faults gently but blame them not over sharply ; for of such
 
 7O ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 missings gently admonished of, proceed glad and good heed- 
 taking ; of good heed-taking springeth chiefly knowledge, which 
 after groweth to perfectness, if this order be diligently used by 
 the scholar and gently handled by the master. For here shall 
 all the hard points of grammar both easily and surely be 
 learned up ; which scholars in common schools by making 
 of Latines be groping at with care and fear, and yet in many 
 years they scarce can reach unto them " (p. 264). 
 
 "I remember," he says, "when I was young, in the north 
 they went to the grammar school little children ; they came 
 from thence great lubbers always learning and little profiting ; 
 learning without book everything, understanding within the 
 book little or nothing." By the suggested method the pupils 
 will truly know what is in the book. To construe orally, to 
 write translation, then to retranslate, to parse, and to analyze 
 the passage with a view to mark out all the peculiarities, 
 involves the perusal of the passage a dozen times at the least. 
 Thus we follow Pliny's advice to his friend Fuscus " Multum, 
 non multa 1 ." 
 
 When the scholar has attained considerable skill in 
 retranslating into Latin, then the teacher should proceed as 
 follows. Let him write some letter as if from him to his father 
 or some friend, " naturally according to the disposition of the 
 child," or some fable or narrative, and let him translate this 
 into Latin, " abiding in some place where no other scholar can 
 prompt him." The teacher will use his discretion in such a 
 way as to choose matter within the compass of the boy's 
 previous reading, and " now," says Ascham, "take heed lest the 
 scholar do not better in some point than yourself, except ye have 
 been diligently exercised in these kinds of translating before." 
 
 II. CRITICISM OF CONTEMPORARY METHODS. Ascham now 
 proceeds to consider the ways " appointed by the best learned 
 men for the learning of tongues and increase of eloquence," 
 
 1 Ratke, Milton, and Jacotot, all advocated the thorough "lessoning" 
 of one book in acquiring a language.
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST /I 
 
 and to give his judgment on the value of these. And first of 
 these is Translation. 
 
 Regarding translation and its importance, all agree, he says, 
 but it brings forth little comparatively, (i) because it is single 
 and not double translation ; and (2) because of the lack of the 
 daily use of writing, "which is the only thing that breedeth 
 deep root both in the wit for good understanding, and in the 
 memory for sure keeping of all that is learned." Tullie, " De 
 Oratore," commends this way. Plinius Secundus also, in 
 an epistle to his friend Fuscus, recommends this mode of 
 procedure with a view not merely to the acquisition of a 
 language, but of Rhetoric, and of a sound judgment in the 
 selection of arguments and expressions. Ascham maintains 
 that any scholar who will translate in this way Tullie, " De 
 Senectute," and the " Epistle ad Quintum Fratrem," and the 
 other "Ad Lentulum," the last save one in the first book, 
 " will come to a better knowledge of the Latin tongue than the 
 most part do who spend four or five years in tossing all the 
 rules of grammar in common schools." He tells us that Queen 
 Elizabeth, his pupil, never took grammar in her hand after the 
 first declining of the noun and verb, " but only by this double 
 translating of Demosthenes and Isocrates daily without missing 
 every forenoon, and likewise some part of Tullie every afternoon, 
 for the space of a year or two, had attained to such a perfect 
 understanding in both the tongues and to such a ready utterance 
 of the Latin, and that with such a judgment as they be few in 
 number, in both the universities or elsewhere in England, that 
 be in both tongues comparable with her majesty" (p. 272). 
 
 Another argument used by Ascham is that in this exercise 
 the master as well as the pupil is guided to correct expression. 
 
 At this stage, instruction in the mere structure of the 
 language may be held to end. What follows belongs to 
 the best means of forming style as distinct from merely 
 grammatical writing in its plainest form. Paraphrasing, meta-
 
 72 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 phrasing, epitome, imitation, declamation, are all considered in 
 their order. 
 
 Of Paraphrasing, he says : This was first tried by C. Carbo, 
 and tried for a while by Lucius Crassus, but condemned by 
 him and Cicero. Quintilian, it is true, commends the practice. 
 Pliny, Quintilian's pupil, however, condemned it. He calls it 
 audax contentio. Ascham calls the practice "the turning, 
 chopping and changing the best to worse." The scholar, if he 
 has, as he is presumed to have, a good model, is in fact trying 
 to express in a worse and inferior way what is already expressed 
 beautifully. "The scholar," says Ascham, "shall win nothing 
 by paraphrasis, but only (if we may believe Tullie) to choose 
 worse words, to place them out of order, to fear overmuch the 
 judgment of the master, to mislike overmuch the hardness of 
 learning ; and by use to gather up faults which hardly will be 
 left off again" (p. 274). Ascham here enters into the question 
 of the rhetorical benefit, as well as the grammatical, of such 
 exercises. He quotes Sturmius, who counsels all to avoid 
 paraphrasis, unless it be from worse to better. 
 
 The only case in which paraphrasis is valuable is, Ascham 
 thinks, in turning Ionic or Doric into the Attic form or style. 
 A good example of this is the translation of Herodotus' story 
 of Candaules and Gyges out of the Ionic into the Attic by 
 Dionysius of Halicarnassus, in his book Ilepi aw^e'crews 'QvopAriov. 
 Ascham believes that such exercises would give great power 
 over the Greek tongue, but it is evident that they are beyond 
 the scope of grammar-school teaching, and belong rather to the 
 university. 
 
 Metaphrasis is the turning of prose into verse, or vice-versa. 
 Socrates amused himself in prison by turning ^Esop's fables 
 into verse. Quintilian lauds the exercise, but Ascham thinks 
 it of doubtful value save at the university stage (boys went to 
 the university at fifteen or even younger), and then only in 
 very competent hands. He gives examples; but, in truth, 
 they are not truly examples, it seems to me, of deliberate
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST /3 
 
 metaphrasis, but rather of imitation, which is unquestionably 
 a good exercise. We have an illustration in the comparison 
 of parallel passages in eminent writers, the study of which is, in 
 capable hands, I think, full of the elements of literary and 
 rhetorical culture. 
 
 Under the head of Epitome, he remarks that Epitomes are 
 of great utility if made by a student himself for his own use ; 
 but they are hurtful to teach from. 
 
 The rest of the chapter is, in reality, a short treatise on 
 vices of style, and has reference rather to rhetoric than to the 
 work of the schoolroom. There occur in the course of it 
 many wise observations and not a little keen criticism and 
 sarcasm, and it is as a whole most interesting and instructive. 
 
 Imitation. "Imitation is a faculty to express lively and 
 perfectly that example which ye go about to follow." 
 
 " All languages both learned and mother-tongues be gotten 
 and gotten only by imitation." 
 
 "If ye would speak and write as the best and wisest, ye 
 must be conversant where the best and wisest are." 
 
 This chapter is, in truth, a continuance of the treatise on 
 rhetoric begun in the previous chapter. He dwells on the 
 necessity of comparing the great classical authors one with 
 another, so as to ascertain and mark carefully in what respects 
 they differed in their mode of handling the same subjects. 
 In Ascham's generation, pure style was the mark of true 
 learning, as opposed to the barbarous Latinity and vain dispu- 
 tations of the schoolmen, which were identified with ignorance. 
 There is consequently an exaggeration of the necessity of 
 imitation, which was due to the circumstances of the time 
 and the state of learning. The object of the Humanists was 
 to form style through the study and reproduction of the best 
 models. Every classical student should read this chapter, 
 as it contains many just criticisms on classical authors. A 
 portion of it may be compared with Quintilian's remarks 
 on great writers in his tenth book to which I have already
 
 74 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 referred. I doubt if more sound criticism on the literature 
 of Greece and Rome is to be had, than may be found in 
 the brief analysis contained in the writings of these two men 
 taken together. 
 
 Ascham, in his commendation of imitation, has evidently 
 in view the literary translation of a passage in a famous author 
 from the language in which he writes into another, and is 
 influenced by the opinion of Pliny in Epist. VH. 9, where he 
 says, writing to his friend Fuscus, " You ask me what I think 
 should be your method of study in the retirement which you 
 have been for some time enjoying. As useful as anything, as 
 it is frequently recommended, is the practice of translating 
 either your Greek into Latin, or your Latin into Greek. By 
 practising this, you acquire propriety and dignity of expression, 
 an abundant choice of the beauties of style, power in descrip- 
 tion and in the imitation of the best models, a facility of 
 creating such models for yourself. Besides, what may escape 
 you when you read, cannot escape you when you translate. 
 From this follows a quick appreciation of beauty and sound 
 taste. There is no reason why you should not write about 
 the subjects which you have been already reading, keeping 
 to the same matter and line of argument, as if you were a 
 rival ; should then compare it with what you have read, and 
 carefully consider whether the author has been the happier 
 of the two, and wherefore. You may congratulate yourself 
 much if sometimes you have done better, but should be much 
 ashamed if he is always superior. Sometimes you may select 
 even very famous passages, and compete with what you select. 
 The competition is daring enough, but, as it is private, cannot 
 be called impudent 1 ." Such exercises are only, it is clear, for 
 advanced scholars. 
 
 III. THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING MORE THAN ONE 
 LANGUAGE. Speaking again of the importance of knowing 
 
 1 Translated by Messrs Church and Brodribb in Ancient Classics for 
 English Readers.
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 75 
 
 more languages than one, with a view to style, he says 
 (p. 308)- 
 
 " Therefore thou, that shootest at perfection in the Latin 
 tongue, think not thyself wiser than Tullie was, in choice of 
 the way that leadeth rightly to the same : think not thy wit 
 better than Tullie's was, as though that may serve thee that 
 was not sufficient for him. For, even as a hawk flieth not 
 high with one wing, even so a man reacheth not to excellency 
 with one tongue. 
 
 " I have been a looker-on in the cock-pit of learning these 
 many years ; and one cock only have I known, which with 
 one wing, even at this day, doth pass all other, in mine 
 opinion, that ever I saw in any pit in England though they 
 had two wings. Yet nevertheless, to fly well with one wing 1 , 
 to run fast with one leg, be rather rare masteries much to be 
 marvelled at, than sure examples safely to be followed. A 
 bishop, that now liveth, a good man, whose judgment in 
 religion I better like than his opinion in perfectness in other 
 learning, said once unto me, 'We have no need now of the 
 Greek tongue, when all things be translated into Latin.' But 
 the good man understood not, that even the best translation is 
 for mere necessity but an evil imped wing to fly withal, or a 
 heavy stump leg of wood to go withal. Such the higher they 
 fly, the sooner they falter and fail : the faster they run, the 
 ofter they stumble and sorer they fall." 
 
 IV. SCHOOL DISCIPLINE. In handling this part of method, 
 Ascham speaks with justice, though sometimes with acerbity, 
 of teachers. His remarks being quite fresh, and applicable, 
 to a large extent at least, to the circumstances of our present 
 time, I shall ask your attention to them. Apart from their 
 intrinsic value, the raciness and verve of the language in which 
 they are expressed justify my quoting them. 
 
 Discipline was, in Ascham's own view, a very important 
 
 1 "Habeas licebit alterum pedem Laclae, Inepte, frustra crure ligneo 
 curres " (Martial, x. 82).
 
 76 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 part of his treatise. In the preface narrating the circumstances 
 which led to his undertaking the book, we see that it was the 
 question of school discipline which led him to take up his 
 pen. Some boys had run away from Eton because of the 
 severities there practised, and this led to a conversation among 
 some men of the time, in the course of which Ascham main- 
 tained that " children were sooner allured by love than driven 
 by beating to attain good learning." Others concurred, Sir 
 Robert Sackville citing his own sad experience, which, how- 
 ever, seems to have been a very common one. Ascham's 
 school-method, accordingly, had for its motive a moral purpose. 
 In the course of his remarks he is naturally led, like Quintilian, 
 to make various wise and discriminating remarks on the 
 different characters of boys. 
 
 As to the relation between teacher and scholar Ascham 
 wishes that the scholar should never have any hesitation in 
 asking the master questions. The relation should be of so free 
 a kind, that he will not be driven to seek for prompting or to 
 resort to unlawful means of obtaining help 1 . 
 
 "If the child miss," he says, "either in forgetting a word, 
 or in changing a good with a worse, or mis-ordering a sentence, 
 I would not have the master either frown or chide with him, 
 if the child have done his diligence and used no trowandship 
 therein. For I know by good experience that a child shall 
 take more profit of two faults gently warned of, than of four 
 things rightly hit" (p. 201). 
 
 As to discipline generally, Ascham is an advocate for love 
 rather than fear. "I do gladly agree," he says, " with all 
 good schoolmasters to have children brought to good perfect- 
 ness in learning, to all honesty in manners, to have all faults 
 
 1 Another great Humanist, Cardinal Wolsey, in his directions to the 
 master of Ipswich School (1528), says, " Imprimis hoc unum admonendum 
 censuerimus ut neque plagis severioribus neque vultuosis minis aut ulla 
 tyrannidis specie tenera pubes afficiatur; hac, enim, injuria ingenii alacritas 
 aut extingui aut magna ex parte obtundi solet."
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 77 
 
 rightly amended, to have every vice severely corrected ; but for 
 the order and way that leadeth rightly to these points we some- 
 what differ" (p. 206). Schoolmasters, he says, rather mar 
 than mend their pupils by their severity. When angry with 
 some other matter altogether, they make their pupils suffer for 
 it. These be foolish schoolmasters, you will say, and there be 
 few of them : foolish they be, but " over many such be found 
 everywhere." "In punishing, too, they quite as often punish 
 nature, as correct faults. Yet some men, wise indeed, but, 
 in this matter, more by severity of nature than any wisdom 
 at all, do laugh at us when we thus wish and reason that 
 young children should rather be allured to learning by 
 gentleness and love, than compelled to learning by beating 
 and fear." "They say our reasons serve only to breed forth 
 talk and pass away time ; but we never saw good schoolmasters 
 do so, nor never read of wise men that thought so." He then 
 brings against them the judgment of Plato, who says : " No 
 learning ought to be learned with bondage ; for bodily labours 
 wrought by compulsion hurt not the body, but any learning 
 learned by compulsion tarrieth not long in the mind." He 
 also points out that young men trained by compulsion, when 
 by time they come to their own rule, carry commonly from 
 school with them a perpetual hatred of their master, and a 
 continual contempt for learning. He then contravenes the 
 opinion that children have a natural distaste for learning, and 
 throws the blame on the schoolmaster. He also advises 
 doubters to read John Sturmius, " De Institutione Principis." 
 At the same time, he countenances beating for moral faults ; 
 but not for intellectual shortcomings. " Yea, many times the 
 better nature," he says, "is sore punished : for if one by quickness 
 of wit take his lesson readily, another by hardness of wit taketh 
 it not so speedily, the first is always commended, the other 
 is commonly punished ; when a wise schoolmaster should 
 rather discreetly consider the right disposition of both their 
 natures, and not so much weigh what either of them is able
 
 78 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 to do now, as what either of them is likely to do hereafter. 
 For this I know, not only by reading of books in my study, 
 but also by experience of life abroad in the world, that those 
 which be commonly the wisest, the best learned, and best men 
 also, when they be old, were never commonly the quickest 
 of wit when they were young. The causes why, amongst 
 other, which be many, that move me thus to think, be these 
 few which I will reckon. Quick wits be commonly apt to 
 take, unapt to keep ; soon hot, and desirous of this and that, 
 as cold, and soon weary of the same again ; more quick to 
 enter speedily than able to pierce far; even like over sharp 
 tools, whose edges be very soon turned. Such wits delight 
 themselves in easy and pleasant studies, and never pass forward 
 in high and hard sciences. And therefore the quickest wits 
 commonly may prove the best poets, but not the wisest orators : 
 ready of tongue to speak boldly, not deep of judgment, either 
 for good counsel, or wise writing. Also for manners and life, 
 quick wits commonly be, in desire newfangled, in purpose 
 unconstant, light to promise anything, ready to forget every- 
 thing, both benefit and injury : and thereby neither fast to 
 friend, nor fearful to foe : inquisitive of every trifle, not secret 
 in greatest affairs ; bold with any person, busy in every matter ; 
 soothing such as be present, nipping any that is absent; of 
 nature also always flattering their betters, envying their equals, 
 despising their inferiors ; and, by quickness of wit, very quick 
 and ready to like none so well as themselves " (p. 206). 
 
 Ascham afterwards gives the notes of the best wits for 
 learning, following Plato, viz. 
 
 A mind well disposed generally, 
 
 Of a good memory, 
 
 Loving learning, 
 
 Loving labour, 
 
 Loving to learn of others, 
 
 Disposed to ask questions, 
 
 Loving praise. 
 We may compare with this a parallel passage in Quintilian's
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 79 
 
 first book ; but Ascham works the whole question out much 
 more fully than Quintilian. 
 
 V. VIRTUE. We now see Roger Ascham's aim in education : 
 it was a humanistic aim in the broadest sense. I have shown 
 you briefly his method of teaching language and forming style, 
 and given you his views of scholastic discipline. In all you 
 see a man of simple and direct outlook, of strong and manly 
 sense, of moral purpose and vigour. Had he no higher 
 purpose than culture in the humanistic sense ? Of course he 
 had. All men who have written about education, and who are 
 worth reading, have placed before themselves the ethical out- 
 come of school and its studies as the highest. In the latter 
 part of his treatise (and, indeed, all through) Ascham shows 
 how sensible he was of the prime importance of this aspect of 
 education, and in the whole of the first book of The Schole- 
 master, the moral result of the discipline which he advocates 
 is constantly present to his mind. "Virtue and learning," 
 these go together as inseparable. He desires that children be 
 brought up in " God's fear " to " honesty of life and perfectness 
 of learning." This training to virtue is, after all, his main 
 interest. In his Toxophilus he says, " If a young tree grow 
 crooked, when it is old a man shall rather break it than straight 
 it." He was too much of a Greek not to have constantly before 
 him apeTT;, CTUK^/OOO-UVT/, TO KaAoV as the final aims of all school 
 work. " To come down," he says, " from higher matters to my 
 little children, and poor schoolhouse again, I will, God willing, 
 go forward orderly to instruct children and young men both for 
 learning and manners." " I wish," he says, " to have love of 
 learning bred up in children. I wish as much to have young 
 men brought up in good order of living, and in some more severe 
 discipline than commonly they be." The schoolmaster has to 
 see to this, but " always using such discreet moderation as that 
 the schoolhouse should be counted a sanctuary against fear." 
 
 But he felt that the most pressing matter was the method and 
 quality of the instruction, as alone insuring milder discipline, and
 
 80 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 he accordingly devotes himself formally to the consideration of 
 these ; but the higher aim runs like a thread through the whole 
 treatise. To the attainment of this higher aim a better method 
 and a milder discipline were preconditions, and accordingly he 
 throws his force on them. But learning, he well knew, will not 
 suffice alone; and yet we may be assured that if a youth's 
 mind be brought into contact with the highest literary forms, 
 and through literature with the substance of morality, learning 
 will do much. 
 
 " Learning," says Ascham, " teacheth more in one year 
 than experience in twenty; and learning teacheth safely when 
 experience maketh more miserable than wise. He hazardeth 
 sore that waxeth wise by experience. An unhappy master 
 he is that is made cunning by many shipwrecks 1 ." And 
 again, " Learning, ye wise fathers, and good bringing up, and 
 not blind and dangerous experience, is the next and readiest 
 way, that must lead your children, first to wisdom, and 
 then to worthiness, if ever ye purpose they shall come there. 
 And to say all in short, though I lack authority to give counsel, 
 yet I lack not good will to wish, that the youth in England, 
 specially gentlemen, and namely nobility, should be by good 
 bringing up so grounded in judgement of learning, so founded 
 in love of honesty, as, when they should be called forth to the 
 execution of great affairs in service of their prince and country, 
 they might be able to use and to order all experiences, were 
 they good, were they bad, and that according to the square, 
 rule, and line of wisdom, learning, and virtue " (p. 238). 
 " Italy and Rome," he elsewhere says, " have been, to the great 
 good of us that now live, the best breeders and bringers-up of 
 the worthiest men, not only for wise speaking but also for well- 
 doing in all civil affairs, that ever was in the world." " Virtue 
 once made that country mistress over all the world ; vice now 
 
 1 The saying of Erasmus may be applied to those schoolmasters who do 
 not study philosophy and method as well as to young men : " Experience is 
 the common schoolhouse of fools and ill men."
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 8 1 
 
 maketh that country slave to them that before were glad to 
 serve it." If we would avoid such a fate, we must train and 
 discipline the young, so that they may "find pain in doing ill"; 
 and if " to the goodness of nature be joined the wisdom of the 
 teacher, in leading young wits into a right and plain way of 
 learning, surely children kept up in God's fear, and governed 
 by His grace, may most easily be brought well to serve God 
 and their country both by virtue and wisdom " (p. 221). "The 
 foundation of youth well set (as Plato doth say), the whole 
 body of the commonwealth shall flourish thereafter." 
 
 VI. GYMNASTIC AND Music. A man of Ascham's antique 
 habit of thought was not likely to omit the Greek gymnastic 
 out of his consideration. He urged that young gentlemen 
 should "use and delight in all courtly exercises and gentleman- 
 like pastimes." The Athenians, by making Apollo and Pallas 
 "patrons of learning to their youth," meant that learning should 
 always be mingled with honest mirth and comely exercises. 
 "All pastimes joined with labour, used in open place and in 
 daylight, containing either some fit exercise for war or some 
 pleasant pastime for peace, be not only comely and decent, 
 but also very necessary for a courtly gentleman to use." But 
 it is in the Toxophilus that we find gymnastic as an element 
 in education most strongly urged. He says there, "I heard a 
 good husband at his book once say, that to omit study some 
 time of the day and some time of the year, made as much for 
 the increase of learning as to let the land lie sometime fallow 
 maketh for the better increase of corn." And he quotes 
 Aristotle as saying, "that as rest is for labour and medicines, 
 for health, so is pastime at times for sad and weighty study." 
 For keen and able minds physical exercise was more necessary 
 than for dull and plodding intelligences : "The best wits to 
 learning" (he says in his Toxophilus) "must needs have 
 much recreation and ceasing from their books, or else they 
 mar themselves, when base and dumpish wits can never be 
 hurt by continual study." 
 
 L. 6
 
 82 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 It was as pastime only that he advocated gymnastic. The 
 Hellenic idea that gymnastic had itself a moral aim did not 
 occur to Ascham. At the same time, he points out that some 
 pastimes not only contribute more to the health of the body 
 than others do, but are more conducive to morality, by being 
 public and demanding labour of body. For Ascham, and 
 indeed the Humanists generally, were practical believers in the 
 old saying of Epicharmus, that God has sold virtue and many 
 other good things to man in return for labour, and that amuse- 
 ment where there was no labour was hurtful to youth. 
 
 In his Toxophilus Ascham regrets that not more than 
 one youth in six entering Cambridge can sing. He also 
 deplores the decline of the practice of teaching the children 
 of England "plain-song and prick-song 1 ." He evidently at- 
 taches a moral value to music-teaching, and on this point 
 quotes Plato and Aristotle with approval. In the Cathedral 
 grammar-schools prior to the Reformation the course of in- 
 struction almost always included singing. In fact the schools 
 were often called "Song schools." Ascham complains that 
 only one in six could sing; how many Cambridge freshmen 
 can sing to-day ? 
 
 Ascham's aim, as we have seen, was the same as that of 
 all the Humanists and we may say of all educational writers 
 worth reading the promotion of virtue and wisdom. In his 
 Preface he says, "In the bringing up of youth there are three 
 special points truth of religion, honesty of living, and right 
 order in learning. In which three ways I pray God my poor 
 children may walk." The means whereby the end was to be 
 obtained was literature, and the "criticism of life" which is 
 embodied in literature. Literature furnished the materials 
 with which the human mind was to be fed, as well as the 
 vehicle of discipline. In the acquisition of literature, and in 
 coming into personal contact with great and heroic examples, 
 
 1 Music in parts.
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 83 
 
 the true moral discipline for youth consisted. The study of 
 language, which specially belongs to boyhood, is the study of 
 literature in its elements, and trains at every step the powers 
 of perception, discrimination, and judgment, while laying the 
 foundation for higher things. 
 
 Do not suppose that I have exhausted Ascham : this is a 
 mere introduction to the study of him. Of his method, 
 generally, we may say that it was a sound and sensible one. 
 If followed, it would certainly give the intellectual and moral 
 discipline at which he aimed, and remove those obstacles to 
 learning which make it hateful to boys. He did not deal with 
 the art of education on psychological principles. In his time 
 there was no psychology. But a keen, vigorous, and sane 
 mind like Ascham's could hit very near the mark without the 
 formal machinery of philosophy : 
 
 "He knew what's what, and that's as high 
 As metaphysic wit can fly." 
 
 (Butler's Hudibras, pt I, canto I, 1. 149.) 
 
 And what came of it all, so far as the practice of schools 
 is concerned? Nothing. And yet that staunch old Tory, 
 Samuel Johnson (and not alone weak-headed "theorists" who 
 have always been suspected of revolutionary proclivities), says 
 that "it contains, perhaps, the best advice that was ever given 
 for the study of languages." And Mr Quick tells us that 
 Professor J. E. B. Mayor declares that "this book sets forth 
 the only sound method of acquiring a dead language." Had 
 Ascham's own college (St John's, Cambridge) founded a 
 lectureship on education, three hundred years ago, restricted 
 to Quintilian and Ascham, the whole course of English educa- 
 tion would have been powerfully influenced. 
 
 To return to Ascham himself: his characteristics, as re- 
 vealed in his writings, appeared in his life. He was a pleasant- 
 mannered and a brave man, and called forth the affection as 
 
 62
 
 84 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 
 
 well as esteem of his contemporaries. We find no exaggeration 
 in the epigraphic lines of George Buchanan 
 
 "Aschamum extinctum patrias, Graiaeque Camenae 
 
 Et Latiie, vera cum pietate, dolent ; 
 Principibus vixit carus, jucundus amicis, 
 
 Re modica, in mores dicere fama nequit." 
 
 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES. 
 
 1. Among the educational treatises of note during this century 
 was that of Hieronymus Wolf, "Docendi discendique ratio," 
 published about 1576. 
 
 2. The student of Education would do well to read in connexion 
 with the whole period of the Renaissance Guizot's Lectures on 
 Civilization in Europe, and Hallam's Literary History of the 
 Middle Ages, and to consult Symonds' exhaustive work. 
 
 3. The two passages on which Ascham confessedly bases his 
 system of "Double Translation" are Cic. de Orat. I. 34, and Plin. 
 Epistol. vn. 9. In the passage from the De Oratore the words 
 are put into the mouth of M. Licinius Crassus, the most illustrious 
 of Roman orators before the time of Cicero. The latter was not 
 only trained by Crassus when a boy (de Oratore, II. i, 2) but 
 appears to have selected him as the mouthpiece of his own views 
 in the dialogue. The passage referred to is as follows : 
 
 Cicero de Orat. \. 34. "But in my daily exercises I used, 
 when a youth, to adopt chiefly that method which I knew that 
 Caius Carbo, my adversary, generally practised ; which was, that 
 having selected some nervous piece of poetry, or read over such a 
 portion of a speech as I could retain in my memory, I used to 
 declaim upon what I had been reading in other words, chosen 
 with all the judgment that I possessed. But at length I perceived 
 that in that method there was this inconvenience, that Ennius, 
 if I exercised myself on his verses, or Gracchus, if I laid one of 
 his orations before me, had forestalled such words as were peculiarly 
 appropriate to the subject, and such as were the most elegant 
 and altogether the best ; so that if I used the same words, it 
 profited nothing : if others, it was even prejudicial to me, as I
 
 ROGER ASCHAM, THE HUMANIST 85 
 
 habituated myself to use such words as were less eligible. After- 
 wards I thought proper, and continued the practice at a rather 
 more advanced age, to translate the orations of the best Greek 
 orators ; by fixing upon which I gained this advantage, that while 
 I rendered into Latin what I had read in Greek, I not only used 
 the best words, and yet such as were of common occurrence, but 
 also formed some words by imitation, which would be new to ourj 
 countrymen, taking care, however, that they were unobjectionable.' 
 Watson's Translation (Bonn's series). 
 
 4. The letter of Pliny (vn. 9) referred to in the text is 
 addressed to Fuscus, one of his many literary friends, who had 
 been asking him for advice as to his studies. The whole letter is 
 exceedingly interesting. 
 
 5. The most important English writers of the period after 
 Ascham were Mulcaster, d. 1611, who wrote Positions ("vide 
 Quick's edition) and The Elementarie ; and Brinsley, who wrote 
 on the Grammar School. 
 
 6. The most important of the men omitted is probably the 
 German Wimpheling, whose book, Guide for the German Youth, 
 was published in 1497, followed by Die fitgend in 1500. The 
 writings of this distinguished educationalist would, I have no 
 doubt, repay a study which I have not time to give to him. The 
 man who wrote (Janssen's History of the German People at the 
 Close of the Middle Ages, p. 80) " Let cultivation be for the 
 quickening of independent thought" was far removed from the 
 Mediaeval school.
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 THE JESUITS. 
 Order founded in 1534. 
 
 IN some respects the greatest educational movement 
 generated during the second period of the Renaissance was 
 that of Ignatius of Loyola (born 1491, died 1556), the 
 founder of the Jesuit Order. To this I have already adverted ; 
 but it merits a fuller notice, because it was a scheme of 
 university as well as of secondary instruction. This order, 
 founded in 1534 by Ignatius of Loyola and five associates, 
 knew what it wanted ; the Protestant Humanists did not. As 
 recognized by Papal Bull in 1540, it was primarily a missionary 
 organization. Adapting themselves to the urgent wants of the 
 time, the members devoted themselves to education and to 
 the cultivation of learning. Primary education certainly 
 received its great impulse from the Reformers, dogma and the 
 " godly upbringing " of the young being the governing aim. 
 We cannot say the same of secondary instruction, although 
 there were many excellent secondary schools of a Protestant 
 character. But the higher education generally was left to the 
 Jesuits to undertake. 
 
 It was not the Renaissance as a literary and aesthetic, but 
 as a theological movement, which led to the institution of the
 
 THE JESUITS S/ 
 
 Jesuit schools. They were bulwarks of the Faith. They 
 adopted as much of Humanism as served their purpose. To 
 say what a Jesuit school was as compared with a cathedral or 
 monastery school is not difficult. Latin formed in the former, 
 as in the latter, the central subject of instruction, but now it was 
 the Latin of classical antiquity. Eloquence in the restricted 
 sense of Latin style was the aim. The main purpose of this 
 system apart from its governing religious idea was to give 
 command of Latin as a medium of communication no less 
 than of personal culture. The service of the Church was the 
 end of all learning. Orators and poets were studied with a 
 view to this. A marked advance on the mediaeval studies was 
 thus a conspicuous feature of the school system, and as Lord 
 Bacon says in The Advancement of Learning " partly in 
 themselves, partly by the emulation and provocation of their 
 example, they quickened and strengthened the state of learning." 
 One hundred Colleges and Houses were established within 
 fifteen years of the foundation of the Order. In 1640 they 
 numbered 372. Prior to the French Revolution there were 
 ninety Colleges (secondary schools, and high schools or 
 " Academies ") in France alone. And these secondary schools 
 and universities were far in advance of Protestant and State 
 institutions. If we add the elements of Greek to Latin oratory 
 we say all that there is to be said as to the central subjects of 
 secular instruction. There is no record of any Jesuit school, so 
 far as I know, which approached in its breadth of study or in 
 the organization of school work the Protestant Gymnasium of 
 Sturm at Strassburg, much less the school of Neander or of 
 Trotzendorf examples however which were not largely followed 
 by Protestants. 
 
 How was it then that the Jesuit schools so far excelled the 
 Humanistic secondary schools of the Reformation as wholly to 
 eclipse them and to evoke the approval of Bacon and other 
 Protestant men of eminence ? The answer is contained in one 
 word, organization.
 
 88 THE JESUITS 
 
 (1) There was a ratio studiorum deliberately laid down 
 and carried out. 
 
 (2) There was an organization of the teaching staff so 
 conceived as to attain the objects of the school and suited to a 
 system of carefully graded classes. The work was thorough 
 throughout. 
 
 (3) There was a ratio docendi et discendi. A great many 
 sensible rules of method in teaching were adopted and put into 
 practice. All parts of the school were subjected to one idea 
 and to one unquestioned authority. The school worked *as an 
 organism. 
 
 To these characteristics we must add that the discipline was 
 comparatively mild (always a consequence of good organization). 
 There were unwholesome elements in the discipline, it is true 
 too much emulation and a tendency to espionage and its 
 consequent evils ; but it was freed from the harshness that 
 characterized other schools. Great attention also was paid to 
 the health and bodily vigour of the pupils. If we add to this that 
 all the schools were everywhere alike as being under one Order, 
 and thus commanded the confidence of parents, we can easily 
 see that success was certain. The Protestant schools had too 
 much individualism about them. Their educational theory was 
 larger, their course of instruction for a time theoretically wider, 
 the spirit that animated them was more that of Humanism 
 and freedom, but against such characteristics, admirable as 
 they are, organization and recognized system will always carry 
 the day. 
 
 ^TT^It was, then, not only by their activity in politics and Church 
 work that the Jesuits arrested the tide of Protestantism, but also 
 and chiefly by their schools. They believed in education as 
 moulding the future man, and had a conviction of its power, 
 which even to this day Protestants do not share, spite of all their 
 platform talk. At one time it almost appeared as if the whole 
 secondary and university education of the Continent of Europe 
 would fall into their hands, and had it not been for the
 
 THE JESUITS 89 
 
 restriction of their aims by Church requirements, the tendency 
 of their system to crush out spontaneity, the reactionary 
 character of their most advanced teaching, the ultimate issue 
 and crown of which was, mediaeval philosophy and theology, 
 complete success, it seems to me, would have been assured. 
 
 & The school organization of the Jesuits became a tradition ; 
 the ratio studiorum and the ratio docendi were handed down. 
 They have not written much on Paedagogy, but their system 
 embodies a Paedagogy. That even in these days the Pro- 
 testant intellect does not believe in a School of Education 
 is shown by the opposition or indifference which the movement 
 to instal education as a university subject has had to encounter, 
 and by the fatuous and complacent satisfaction with which 
 secondary schoolmasters have regarded their own ignorance 
 o/ the principles and method of their art as more of a distinc- 
 
 lon than a misfortune. 
 
 \\ 
 
 ~"ln the field of distinctively secondary education, I have 
 said, the Jesuits were strong. Their higher or university 
 instruction was also far from contemptible : they gave a 
 thorough training in scholastic philosophy, theology, and 
 the sciences to the members of the order; but, spite of the 
 fact that there have been among them men eminent in many 
 departments, they cannot be said to have succeeded as repre- 
 sentatives of the higher intellectual ambitions of men. And 
 this for the obvious reason that, as I have above indicated, all 
 teaching was restricted within certain lines with a view to 
 conserve the interests of the Roman Catholic Church. I do 
 not say this by way of reproach : it could not have been other- 
 wise, and they were fortunate in having a definite aim. Latin 
 was the central subject, and the philosophy and theology 
 of the schoolmen, especially of St Thomas Aquinas, bounded 
 their vision. All else was either useless or dangerous to " The 
 Faith." Now, it is essential to the advance of humanity that 
 there should be freedom, and equally essential to a university as 
 standing in the forefront of the movement of reason in the
 
 90 THE JESUITS 
 
 world, that there should be free teaching and free learning. 
 Truth, and truth alone, whithersoever it leads, must be the 
 aim of all intellectual activity. 
 
 Again, and for similar reasons, while the Jesuit order does 
 not forbid, they have never advanced, the education of the 
 masses. There is manifest danger to the Faith in so doing. 
 Their purpose has been to get hold of those whose business is 
 to lead and govern, while confining all others to the simplicities 
 and crudities of faith and obedience. 
 
 Accordingly, we may say with confidence, that the essential 
 characteristic of the humanistic revival (as I have tried to 
 explain it) was alien to the Jesuit spirit, and that the Order 
 was under obligation, in accordance with its own principles, 
 to ally itself with arbitrary authority, despotism, and obscur- 
 antism. It is only while it does not possess the educational 
 field to the exclusion of other and more modern forces that it 
 can be regarded with complacency in a free country. And even 
 as to their educational efficiency in the i6th and lyth centuries 
 we may put against the encomium of Bacon the opinion of 
 Leibnitz, who said that the Jesuits "fell below mediocrity," 
 and the words of Macaulay, who said that the Jesuits seemed 
 to have found the point to which they could push intellectual 
 culture without reaching intellectual emancipation. All modern 
 studies have been regarded with distrust. Obedience and Faith 
 resting on Authority virtually sum up their educational aim. 
 Formalism, consequently, characterises all their methods. 
 
 How remote the spirit and aims of the Jesuits were, and 
 are, from the true spirit of the Humanistic Renaissance is 
 evident enough the moment we recognize in this movement 
 " the endeavour of man to reconstitute himself as a free being, 
 not as the thrall of theological despotism, and the peculiar 
 assistance he derived in this effort from Greek and Roman 
 literature, the litterae humaniores, letters leaning rather to the 
 side of man than of divinity 1 ." 
 
 1 Encyc. Brit., Art. Renaissance.
 
 THE JESUITS 91 
 
 The record of the Humanistic Revival in so far as it told 
 on the schools repeats to us the old lesson that a new idea or 
 a new enthusiasm is very efficacious while it lasts, but cannot 
 long endure. Men cannot go on living at high pressure. It is 
 only in so far as the new idea admits of rational formulation, 
 or at least of being absorbed into the existing civil economy, 
 whether of politics or learning, that it can perpetuate itself. 
 Classical literature in the schools or universities came quickly 
 to mean merely the classical tongues a great gain when 
 compared with mediaeval barrenness ; but Latin and Greek 
 certainly are not Humanism, but merely vehicles for Humanism. 
 If the humanistic fervour partly aesthetic, partly ethical be 
 not in the teacher, the whole teaching degenerates rapidly into 
 language-teaching in its most abstract and uninteresting form. 
 To all but the select few among pupils it thus conveys 
 nothing, while engendering disgust of all books and all 
 thought. This was a fact already before 1600; it is a fact 
 now. The verbal, the abstract, the formal, is not mental 
 food ; it cannot, as such, be so. Its work is discipline ; and 
 this in itself is of little account if divorced from the real ele- 
 ments of literature and life. 
 
 No man interested in the progress of humanity can be in- 
 different to the question : Can we not so use the admirable and 
 various material now in our possession as to excite in the 
 majority of our pupils a genuine interest in literature, in 
 thought, and in the truth of things ? We cannot imperil the 
 intellectual and moral welfare of generations on the chance- 
 birth of teaching genius here and there. Is there a method by 
 which learning would be as pleasant as eating when one is 
 hungry, and which could be made the common possession of 
 all who teach ? If there be not such a method then we must 
 just go on as we have been doing, trying to coerce the mind of 
 youth ; and failing even in this. Is it not possible that by making 
 up our minds as to the end we have in view in educating, we 
 may get some light on the method to be pursued in order to
 
 92 THE JESUITS 
 
 reach that end, nay get inspiration from the mere contemplation 
 of it ? These questions occurred vaguely to Bacon, and were 
 taken up by the Baconians, Ratke, Comenius, Locke, Pestalozzi. 
 The race of schoolmasters called these men " theorists " ; and 
 there an end. This was enough to condemn them. The 
 questions which they started seem to me very important, nay 
 vital questions, if we are to educate at all. 
 
 In endeavouring to answer the questions let us take advan- 
 tage of history. Look at the universities of Europe at the 
 present day. Whence comes their life, their progressiveness, 
 without which there is no life? From Bacon and the Baconian 
 induction and from vernacular literatures, I say without hesita- 
 tion. It is the scientific spirit engaged in every department of 
 human inquiry, physical, historical, philosophical, philological, 
 aesthetic, that keeps them, in these days, centres of intellectual 
 energy. With all their deficiencies, the learning of the world 
 and all its highest rational interests were never so adequately 
 represented in the universities as now. They are true centres 
 of light, and why? Because they seek scientific results, and 
 follow a scientific method. Method has done it all. Is 
 this same method practicable in the school? If so, under 
 what modifications ? There is always a certain percentage of 
 dullards born in the good providence of God to be hewers of 
 wood and drawers of water. But can we not touch to fine 
 issues 70 or 80 per cent, of the youth of the country ? It is 
 certainly worth trying. In fact many schools, especially of the 
 humbler kind, have been already converted by method (and 
 that even imperfectly understood) from dens of darkness and 
 despair into chambers of light and hope. 
 
 Whether education in the true sense is possible or not, this 
 is certain, that until the secondary schoolmasters study the 
 subject at our universities before entering on what they are 
 pleased to call their " profession," an improvement which shall 
 be genuine and progressive, because scientifically and historically 
 grounded, is hopeless. Science and scientific method in all
 
 THE JESUITS 93 
 
 subjects alone prevent the world from falling back into barbarism. 
 Pure literature itself might seem adequate to this ; but even 
 literature is only a part of the universal thought-movement, 
 and has never flourished in its grander forms save as the artistic 
 expression of a philosophy of life and of the earnest pursuit 
 of truth. Take, for a painful example, Italy in the i5th 
 century. 
 
 To return : Meanwhile the vernacular and vernacular litera- 
 tures of France, Germany and England had been growing up side 
 by side with the classical revival, until it was found that the 
 true meaning of the whole Renaissance movement, in so far as it 
 was an Art, Literature, and Science movement, was to be found 
 in modern art, modern literature, and modern science not in 
 the servile imitation of the Greek and Latin writers, though these 
 were wisely retained in the schools as the foundation of linguistic 
 discipline, as models of literary expression, and sources of 
 modern thought. This was, and is, the true Humanism. The 
 use of a more and more refined vernacular now also began to 
 affect that exclusive use of Latin as a means of intercourse in 
 the schools which gave colloquial familiarity with it, and which, 
 even if it had done nothing else, had put into the hands of the 
 student the key to all that had once been worth knowing. 
 Knowledge in every department of human activity was ad- 
 vancing. It is clear enough to us, looking back, that the 
 question of education demanded reconsideration in 1600. 
 Europe was passing into new conditions. In England the 
 voice of Mulcaster was raised in advocacy of the study of 
 English and the training of schoolmasters, but it was as that 
 of one crying in the wilderness. There were now many, how- 
 ever, to express discontent with both school and university. 
 The problem of education in its large and liberal sense must 
 be always substantially the same ; but the materials by means 
 of which, and the conditions under which we are to educate, 
 must be subject to continual modification.
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST, 
 1533 1592 1 . 
 
 MICHEL MONTAIGNE was born in Peiigord, 1533, and died in 
 Bordeaux, 1592, in the 59th year of his age. He was the son 
 of a landed proprietor. On succeeding his father he lived a 
 retired life, free from all political and business harassment, on 
 his paternal estate. 
 
 In due course he studied law, and was appointed a 
 Councillor in the Parliament of Bordeaux when he was only 
 2 1 years of age ; but he soon gave up public life as unsuited 
 to his temperament and genius. Educationally he is the true 
 successor of Rabelais, who died when Montaigne was 20 
 years old. 
 
 Montaigne was an ardent student of ancient literature, and 
 his essays are full of references and quotations. He was 
 neither a scholar, nor a philosopher, nor a theologian, nor a 
 politician. He had formed his ethical views mainly on 
 Plutarch and Seneca, and was by nature and in his criticism 
 of life more nearly allied to Horace perhaps than to any other 
 man. If he is to be classed among the Philosophers he must 
 be placed among the Epicureans rather than the Academics. 
 His Essays treat of all sorts of subjects, and are discursive 
 in their character. His way of looking at life was singularly 
 fresh and original, and having no philosophical or political 
 
 1 The first edition of the Essays appeared in Bordeaux in 1580.
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 95 
 
 purpose to serve he set down his thoughts and observations 
 as they occurred to him, simply and naively, not caring much 
 to preserve consistency. The art in which he especially 
 excelled was the art of living for the day. 
 
 The great essayist and sceptic continues, after a lapse of 
 three hundred years, to speak to us with all the freshness of a 
 contemporary. " We converse with Montaigne," says Hallam, 
 " or rather hear him talk : it is almost impossible to read 
 his essays without thinking that he speaks to us : we see his 
 cheerful brow, his sparkling eye, his negligent but gentlemanly 
 demeanour : we picture him in his arm-chair, with his few 
 books round the room, and Plutarch on the table." As a man 
 of letters, who is also in the best sense a man of the world, he 
 stands alone. He is original and unique as a thinker, and at 
 the same time a type of a class which he had done much to 
 create. Though the class he represents may not be a large 
 one, he yet gives expression to a way of estimating life which 
 is a passing mood of all thoughtful minds. He thus leads a 
 large constituency all the larger that he makes no tyrannical 
 demands, and warns the reader not to labour after even him. 
 Few writers say so many wise things as Montaigne does, and 
 no one appears so little solicitous about convincing others that 
 his sayings are wise. His intellectual philosophy is essentially 
 sophistical and sceptical, his morality conventional, and his 
 moral philosophy epicurean. 
 
 We are not disposed, however, to allow to Montaigne, and 
 such easy-going sceptics as he, the superiority to limitations 
 which they affect. It is all very well to proclaim the impossi- 
 bility of finding absolute truth, and to luxuriate in a cultured 
 indifference, but as the foundation of such talk there lies 
 a philosophical conviction as positive as that of the most 
 ardent zealot. The conviction is that, doomed as man is to 
 nescience, the happiness of each individual is for himself the 
 only solid pursuit, and is to be at all hazards cherished. The 
 standard of happiness will doubtless vary with the idiosyncrasies
 
 96 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 and circumstances of each man, but must always, with cultivated 
 men, embrace equability of mind, balance of judgment, a kindly 
 disposition to all with whom they are brought in contact, an 
 indisposition to exertion for any purpose whatsoever as leading 
 to certain disturbance and almost as certain disappointment, a 
 horror of a " Cause," and a strict regard to the comforts of the 
 animal economy generally. And these were, it seems to me, 
 the characteristics of Montaigne, characteristics which belong 
 to natures fundamentally cold and selfish, incapable of sacrifice. 
 Intellectual scepticism is itself, in truth, an implicit dogmatism, 
 and in the field of moral action it is a self-complacent epicurean 
 dogmatism. No man, in truth, holds more tightly to a positive 
 philosophy of life than Montaigne. Doubtless the attitude of 
 inquiry, the que sfais-je ? gives a breadth and elasticity of mind 
 and promotes a geniality of nature that have their charms. 
 They are, however, the true possession only of those who are 
 not "too sure" of anything. A steady sustained conviction 
 that there is nothing admitting of conviction runs through 
 Montaigne's life and writings, and he is in respect of this as 
 positive as his neighbours. No man can build his house on 
 shifting sand. Montaigne may in words defy us to find him 
 in earnest, but he fails : for he never doubts his attitude of 
 doubt, and he never loses his grip of his ethical standard such 
 as it is. So far at least he is in sober earnest. 
 
 We should like sometimes to find this arch-philosopher 
 of practical life-wisdom in earnest about other things than 
 indifference, and we naturally seek for this quality of earnest- 
 ness in his views of religion and politics subjects which call 
 forth the passions of men more than any other. But not- 
 withstanding all that has been said and written on these points, 
 I think we shall find that his whole mental attitude was such 
 as to forbid definite conclusions even on those vital subjects. 
 His Apology for Sebonde does not throw light on his personal 
 religious beliefs. If readers are disappointed in their expectations 
 of definite conclusions here, they have themselves to blame, for
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 97 
 
 they search for something which his philosophy has beforehand 
 told them not to expect. The fact seems to be that in religion 
 he was strictly conventional, and in politics he was equally 
 conventional. "For Heaven's sake," he might be supposed 
 to say, " don't disturb the status quo ; things are bad enough, 
 I grant, but in seeking to make them better, you will probably 
 make them worse. Let us go on from day to day, quietly 
 meeting little difficulties as they arise, and making the best 
 both of the good and of the bad. The practical guidance of 
 life, in the interests of a universal bonhommie that is our 
 business." 
 
 If we prosecute our inquiry after the "earnest" side of 
 Montaigne's character, we shall find it perhaps most con- 
 spicuous in a genuine desire to amend the condition of the 
 poor (probably because their condition offended his sensibilities), 
 and in his views on education. It is the latter with which we 
 have to do here ; but of both characteristics I would say that 
 they were the fruit of his positive philosophy of negation. A 
 happy, useful (provided usefulness did not call for too much 
 exertion), practically wise life was his sitmmum bonum, and it 
 was this aim that unconsciously determined the substance of 
 his educational theory. In considering, then, his views on edu- 
 cation, we must keep Montaigne's personal character and theory 
 of life before our minds. For education, as distinct from in- 
 struction, is a subject on which no man can possibly write without 
 being, more or less consciously, controlled in all his utterances 
 by his philosophy of man and of the meaning of human life. 
 
 So much is necessary for the proper understanding of 
 Montaigne on education. But more than this is needed for 
 the proper placing of him in the series of educational writers. 
 We have to understand his historical relations and the circum- 
 stances of his life and time, of which receptive men like 
 Montaigne are in a special sense the product and reflexion. 
 
 Luther died when Montaigne was thirteen years old. It 
 was during the latter period of Luther's life that the Humanistic
 
 98 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 movement among the leaders of thought north of the Alps 
 began to tell (as all great philosophic and political movements 
 inevitably do sooner or later) upon the education of youth. The 
 reformation of religion was itself, as we have seen, only part of 
 the larger Humanistic movement. For Humanism was essen- 
 tially a rebellion against words and logical forms in the interest 
 of the realities of life and thought. The Italian Humanists 
 and their pupils prepared the way for the Religious refor- 
 mation. An intellectual movement of this kind could not 
 fail to make itself felt in education as well as in the domain 
 of religion, for it was truly a philosophical movement ; and 
 philosophy ultimately determines all such things. Up to 
 the period of university life, and even beyond it, education 
 consisted in the acquisition of Latin words and rules about 
 Latin, and this, as the boy grew, received the addition of 
 logic with all its scholastic subtleties, and such physics as 
 abridgments of Aristotle could supply. Prior to Montaigne's 
 school-days the intellectual life of the schoolboy was, as may 
 be supposed, very wretched ; but those who survived it, 
 and continued to devote themselves to grammar, rhetoric, 
 and logic, certainly acquired an amount of discipline which 
 could not fail to sharpen their wits. Intensity and subtlety 
 of thought were the natural outcome of the educational system, 
 but accompanied with a restricted range of view and a belief 
 in arid terms and phrases. Luther's educational activity, 
 like that of Erasmus and Melanchthon, was directed to aid the 
 Humanists in reviving in the school a regard for substance as 
 opposed to form. Pure Latinity, the study of the substance of 
 the great Roman writers, and of rhetoric and logic by the 
 perusal of those great products of literary genius out of which 
 the rules of rhetoric and logic were themselves generalized, 
 began (as previously in certain schools of Italy) to take the 
 place of mere words and of barbarous Latinity. The typical 
 schoolmaster of this period, though not the most enlightened, 
 was John Sturm, the rector of the High School of Strasbourg,
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 99 
 
 whose course of instruction, severe and mainly linguistic, was 
 yet such as to give genuine culture to all those who were 
 capable of culture. Sturm died in 1589. Already the Human- 
 istic movement in schools had been represented in England 
 by Dean Colet, who died in 1519, after founding S. Paul's 
 School and putting at its head Mr Lilly; by Sir Thomas 
 Elyot, who died in 1546 ; and by Roger Ascham, who died in 
 1568, and was a correspondent of Sturm. Erasmus, the friend 
 of Colet, and of all the Oxford Reformers, died in 1536. 
 Rabelais died in 1553. Montaigne's position is thus clearly 
 defined. Born in 1533, and dying in 1592, he -was in the 
 midst of the full tide of the reaction against, what Milton calls, 
 " the scholastic grossness of barbarous ages," " ragged notions 
 and babblements " ; and also, curiously enough, in the full tide 
 of the Catholic reaction against Protestantism. 
 
 Montaigne's father, a gentleman of private estate in the 
 province of Guienne, had notions of his own as to the educa- 
 tion of the young Michel, and whatever we may think of them, 
 the son thought highly of his father's method, and all through 
 life retained the profoundest affection and respect for "the 
 best father that ever was." He used to ride in his father's old 
 military cloak, "because," he said, "when I have that on, I 
 seem to wrap myself up in my father." His education, under 
 the paternal roof, was directed morally to the cultivation in 
 him of an intense love of truthfulness and of kindliness of 
 feeling and manners towards the poor and dependent. So 
 solicitous was the father to surround his child with every 
 beneficent influence that he had him roused every morning 
 by the sound of music, that there might be no violent 
 disturbance of his nervous system. Montaigne further tells 
 us the novel arrangements his father made for initiating him 
 in the Latin language without straining his powers. He gave 
 him a Latin-speaking tutor, and surrounded him with Latin 
 conversation, so that when he was six years old he spoke Latin 
 
 72
 
 100 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 fluently much better, indeed, than he could speak his own 
 tongue. The whole household, indeed, became so Latinized 
 that the domestics, and even the peasants on his father's 
 property, began to use Latin words. 
 
 Greek was taught by the invention of a game, but it would 
 appear without much success, for Montaigne's knowledge of 
 Greek literature was never much more than he could obtain 
 through a Latin medium. 
 
 He was only six years old when he was sent to the College 
 of Guienne at Bordeaux, an institution of mark, in which the 
 Humanistic culture must have reigned supreme, if we may 
 judge from the names of the teachers William Guerente the 
 Aristotelian, Muretus the classical Latinist and rhetorician, and 
 our own George Buchanan the historian and Latin poet 1 . At 
 college he lost his familiar acquaintance with colloquial Latin, 
 but largely extended his private reading in classical authors ; 
 this, however, only by a breach of school rules in which he was 
 wisely encouraged by his masters. George Buchanan seems to 
 have been his private tutor as well as his schoolmaster, and it 
 says much for Buchanan that he encouraged young Montaigne's 
 wide reading. At the early age of thirteen he had accom- 
 plished his college course, and although he afterwards affected 
 to study law, it cannot be said that he had any special public 
 instruction outside his professional reading after he was a boy. 
 Had it not been for the wise connivance of his masters, which 
 enabled him to make acquaintance with the literature of Rome, 
 he would have " brought away from college nothing but a 
 hatred of books, as almost all our young gentlemen do." His 
 father was satisfied with the result of his school-life, " for the 
 chief things he expected from the endeavour of those to whom 
 he had delivered me for education was affability of manners and 
 good humour." Montaigne was, to speak the truth, though not 
 idle, yet desultory, and he would be the first to admit it. He 
 
 1 Here also the father of Casaubon received his instruction.
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST IOI 
 
 also complains that he had " a slothful wit that would go no 
 faster than it was led, a languishing invention and an incredible 
 defect of memory, so that it is no wonder," he adds, " if from 
 these nothing considerable could be extracted." He was 
 incapable of sustained effort and of taking much trouble about 
 anything. Nor could it be said that, with all the leisure at his 
 command, he was ever master of any subject : he had " only 
 nibbled," he himself says, "on the outward crust of sciences, and 
 had a little snatch of everything and nothing of the whole." 
 Even of Latin he was not a master, and Scaliger speaks with 
 contempt of his scholarship ; to which, however, Montaigne 
 never made any claim. His innumerable classical allusions and 
 quotations were, however, the genuine fruit of his own reading ; 
 but he read not as a grammarian or philosopher, but as a man 
 of letters. " I make no doubt," he says, with his usual naivete, 
 11 that I oft happen to speak of things that are much better and 
 
 more truly handled by those who are masters of the trade 
 
 Whoever will take me tripping in my ignorance will not in any 
 way displease me ; for I should be very unwilling to become 
 responsible to another for my writings, who am not so to 
 myself nor satisfied with them. Whoever goes in quest of 
 knowledge, let him fish for it where it is to be found : there is 
 nothing I so little profess." Again, " I could wish to have a 
 more perfect knowledge of things, but I will not buy it so dear 
 as it will cost. My design is to pass over easily, and not 
 laboriously, the remainder of my life. There is nothing that 
 I will cudgel my brains about ; no, not knowledge of what price 
 soever. ... I do not bite my nails about the difficulties I 
 meet with in my reading, and after a charge or two I give them 
 over. . . . Continuation and a too obstinate endeavour darken, 
 stupefy, and tire my judgment." 
 
 The moral result was more satisfactory. Montaigne's 
 disposition was naturally kindly, and its kindliness was further 
 fostered by his father's affectionate upbringing. If ever there 
 was a man distinguished for "sweet reasonableness" that
 
 102 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 man was Montaigne. He had the light of culture and also its 
 sweetness. 
 
 I have dwelt a little on Montaigne's own character, because 
 that has to be taken into consideration along with the 
 circumstances of his time, in forming a true estimate of his 
 educational opinions. The character of the man, also, is itself 
 to be regarded as, to some extent at least, the fruit of his 
 education, and retrospectively his father's method comes up 
 for judgment according to the saying, " By their fruits ye shall 
 know them." It is sufficiently clear that of discipline, intel- 
 lectual or moral, Montaigne had received none, and that 
 his nature was one that stood in some need of it. On the 
 other hand, the love that his father bore him and the 
 gentleness of his treatment unquestionably nurtured the 
 ingenuous spirit of his son and gave him a freedom of 
 judgment and a frankness of intelligence which are among 
 Montaigne's principal charms. His mind was not at any 
 time oppressed with too strong a burden of duty or warped 
 by fear. He grew 7 up into an open-eyed, gentle, and sweet- 
 blooded man, with a sound practical judgment a wise man, 
 if not a learned one capable of looking at every side of a 
 question by turns and dallying with each. 
 
 But to follow the example of Montaigne's father would not 
 always succeed. He had a man of genius as his child and 
 pupil, and all he did was felicitously adapted to develop the 
 boy's natural endowments. But the system pursued did not 
 cure the pupil's manifest defects of character. Even his 
 natural weakness of memory, so far from being remedied, was 
 probably increased by the father's lax treatment. Perhaps all 
 the better for the world, it may be said. In this particular 
 case it was so; but we have not young Montaignes to deal 
 with. We have to discipline the intellectual and moral 
 nature of the average boy if we would give energy of will, 
 earnestness of purpose, power of application, and love of 
 duty.
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 103 
 
 When Montaigne gives us his own views' on the education 
 of the young we find them to be very much a reflex of his 
 own experience and character. I shall speak of them as 
 they bear on the end of education, on the materials of 
 instruction, on method, on intellectual and moral discipline, 
 and on the penalties whereby the work of the school is usually 
 enforced. One thing is certain, that on the subject of education 
 Montaigne had no doubts: on the contrary, he speaks with 
 all the zeal of a reformer. 
 
 If we were to put in the shortest form Montaigne's idea of 
 the End of education we should say that it is this : that a man 
 be trained up to the use of his own reason and to virtue. 
 "The trouble and expense of our fathers are directed only to 
 furnish our heads with knowledge ; not a word of judgment 
 and virtue." "A man," he says, "can never be wise save by 
 his own wisdom." Might we not add, A man can never be 
 virtuous save by his own virtue? Again, "If the mind be 
 not better disposed by education, if the judgment be not 
 better settled, I had much rather my scholar had spent his 
 time at tennis, for at least his body would by that means be in 
 better exercise and breath. Do but observe him when he 
 comes back from school, after fifteen or sixteen years that he 
 has been there : there is nothing so awkward and maladroit, so 
 unfit for company and employment ; and all that you shall find 
 he has got is, that his Latin and Greek have only made him a 
 greater and more conceited coxcomb than when he went from 
 home. He should bring back his soul replete with good 
 literature, and he brings it only swelled and puffed up with 
 vain and empty shreds and snatches of learning, and has 
 really nothing more in him than he had before." The author 
 of Hudibras, when he wrote the following lines, gave 
 expression to the impatience of both Montaigne and Milton : 
 
 1 Chiefly in chapters 24, 25 of the First Book.
 
 104 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 " No sooner are the organs of the brain 
 Quick to receive and steadfast to retain 
 Best knowledges, but all's laid out upon 
 Retrieving of the curse of Babylon. 
 
 ***** 
 And he that is but able to express 
 No sense in several languages, 
 Will pass for learneder than he that's known 
 To speak the strongest reason in his own." 
 
 It is true that great men and vigorous natures overcome 
 the defects of their schooling ; but " it is not enough that our 
 education does not spoil us, it must alter us for the better." 
 " It is not enough to tie learning to the soul, but to work and 
 incorporate them together ; not to tincture the soul merely, but 
 to give it a thorough and perfect dye ; and if it will not take 
 colour and meliorate its imperfect state, it were, without 
 question, better to let it alone." Knowledge will not " find a 
 man eyes ; its business is to guide, govern, and direct his steps, 
 provided he have sound feet and straight legs to go upon." 
 Neither Persia nor Sparta, I may interpose, made much 
 account of mere knowledge, and Rome was at its greatest in 
 virtue and vigour before schools were much thought of. To 
 train to valour, honesty, prudence, wisdom, justice these were 
 the aims of the greatest nations. As Agesilaus said when asked 
 " what boys should learn " : " Those things " (he said) " that 
 they ought to do when they become men." 
 
 Montaigne, then, would keep in view the end of education 
 from the very first ; and that end is to train to right reason and 
 independent judgment, to moderation of mind, and to virtue. 
 The cultivated and capable man of affairs, fit to manage his 
 own business well and discharge public duties wisely, is his 
 educated man. This is the antique idea of education, and is 
 very much what Quintilian has in view in the training of the 
 " Good Orator." Philosophy, according to Montaigne, is the 
 highest fruit of education not the philosophy which has logical
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST IO5 
 
 formulae for its subject-matter, but philosophy which has virtue 
 for its end. Virtue and philosophy are not (to use Milton's 
 words) "harsh and crabbed as dull fools suppose," but the 
 "enemies of melancholy and the friends of wisdom : they teach 
 us how to know and make use of all good things, and how to 
 part with them without concern." " Philosophy instructs us to 
 live, and infancy has there its lessons as well as other ages." 
 We are not, however, to force to virtue and to philosophy, but 
 to attract by showing that they alone yield happiness, and by 
 leading the pupil to recognize their essential beauty and charm. 
 It may be that there are youths who are inaccessible to all that 
 is noble and beautiful and ingenuous in thought and action, 
 and turn aside by preference to common pleasures. What is to 
 be done with these? "Bind them 'prentice," says Montaigne, 
 " in some good town to learn to make mince-pies, though they 
 were the sons of dukes"; and in a manuscript emendation he 
 recommends that the masters should " strangle such youths if 
 they can do it without witnesses " ! 
 
 What now has Montaigne to say as to the Materials of 
 instruction whereby his end is to be attained? "The most 
 difficult and most important of all human arts is education," 
 he says. The differences among children increase the difficulty; 
 but the promise of the future is with young children so uncertain 
 that it is better, so far as the matter of instruction goes, to give 
 to all the elements of knowledge alike. In any case, let us 
 begin when they are young, when the clay is moist and soft. 
 From the very first, the lessons of philosophy in their simple 
 and practical form can be inculcated. In philosophy Montaigne 
 includes all that we now understand by the religious and moral, 
 and he maintains, and rightly maintains, that a child's mind is 
 more open to all such lessons than to reading and writing. In 
 selecting other materials of instruction, we must bear in mind 
 that a child " owes but the first fifteen or sixteen years of his 
 life to discipline, and the rest to action. Let us, therefore,
 
 106 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 employ that time in necessary instruction." At every stage 
 that which constitutes the ultimate aim of education is to 
 appear in some form or other philosophy, namely; for it 
 forms the judgment and conduct. This has a hand in every- 
 thing : " She is always in place, and is to be admitted to all 
 sports and entertainments because of the sweetness of her con- 
 versation. By guiding conduct, as well as by discourse in season, 
 this instruction is to be given and habits thus formed." 
 
 Montaigne is generally classed by educational writers as a 
 realist as the very founder of realism. Those who so write, 
 write, it appears to me, without understanding. Educational 
 realism in our modern sense means the substitution of a know- 
 ledge of nature and of the practical work of after-life for the 
 study of language and literature and all that we include in the 
 Humanities. Those who advocate the latter are Humanists, and 
 are the true descendants of the Humanists of the Renaissance. 
 All educationalists, however (except, perhaps, the majority of 
 schoolmasters), are realists in this sense Montaigne's sense 
 that they desire to see reality, that is, to see the substance of fact 
 and thought dominant in the education of youth. Montaigne's 
 realism opposed itself merely to verbalism, and he fought a 
 good fight in this. But all this belongs to the past; in the 
 region of educational theory at least, whatever may be said of 
 practice. We all now seek reality; we are all opposed to mere 
 verbalism. The difference now consists in this, that one school 
 of philosophy holds by language and literature as introducing 
 youth to the highest and best realities the realities of feeling 
 and thought ; the other school holds by facts, the facts of 
 nature and of man's relation to nature as yielding the highest 
 and best realities for educational purposes. If we may make a 
 distinction between the real-humanistic and the verbal-human- 
 istic, there can be no doubt that Montaigne belonged, like 
 Quintilian, to the former class, and not to the utilitarian realists 
 of whom Mr Spencer and Professor Bain are the best contem- 
 porary types.
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST IO/ 
 
 The ordinary subjects of reading, writing, and casting 
 accounts are, of course, to be taught. After this, whatever 
 you teach, avoid words simply as words. So far Montaigne 
 and Bacon would agree. Most modern Humanists, how- 
 ever, would not go so far as Montaigne in their opposition 
 to words. They see more in them. But we must bear in 
 mind the state of things at the time Montaigne wrote. The 
 Humanistic revival, which was a revival in the interest of 
 realities, was also a revival of style ; and the tendency was to 
 give prominence to art in language, and consequently to what 
 may be called the formulas of style. This must always be the 
 case : teachers in their daily work cannot, without the greatest 
 difficulty, consistently maintain from hour to hour the reality of 
 any subject, be it language, literature, or science. The tendency 
 inevitably is to fall back upon mechanical expedients, on the 
 learning of rules, and on symbolism generally. It is so even 
 with religion and morality. To the end of time, the task of 
 the true teacher, who desires truly to educate, will be a struggle 
 against the dominion of words and forms, and this quite irre- 
 spectively of the subjects he may choose to make the basis of 
 his school-work. The virtues of the educational profession 
 are all summed up in the words life, reality ; but, like other 
 virtues, they are not always easily practised. 
 
 "The world," says Montaigne, "is nothing but babble 
 We are kept four or five years to learn nothing but words and 
 to tack them together into clauses ; as many more to make 
 exercises, and to divide a continued discourse into so many 
 parts ; and other five years, at least, to learn succinctly to mix 
 and interweave them after a subtle and intricate manner. Let 
 us leave this to the learned professors ! " Words, grammar, 
 style, and rhetoric constituted the main end of school and 
 college instruction in those days, and this was supplemented 
 by logic. Montaigne held that if a man had really anything to 
 say he could manage to say it without all this training. " Let 
 the pupil be well furnished with things" (i.e. thoughts), he says,
 
 108 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 " words will follow but too fast." People who pretend to have 
 great thoughts which they cannot express are deceiving them- 
 selves ; they are not labouring to bring forth, but merely 
 " licking the formless embryo " of their minds. If a man has 
 any clear conceptions, he will express them well enough, though 
 ignorant of "ablative, conjunctive, substantive, and grammar." 
 " When things are once formed in the fancy, words offer them- 
 selves in muster." " Ipsae res verba rapiunt" says Cicero. 
 "The fine flourishes of rhetoric serve only to amuse the vulgar, 
 who are incapable of more solid and nutritive diet." The 
 attack on mere rhetoric in the sense of the technique of style 
 is keen and incisive, and has not a little truth in it. " Words 
 are to serve and to follow a man's purpose." He quotes 
 Plato as approving of fecundity of conception rather than of 
 fertility of speech, and Zeno as dividing his pupils into two 
 classes, the philologi, who loved things and reasonings, and 
 logophili, who cared for nothing but words. " I am scanda- 
 lized," he says, "that our whole life should be spent in nothing 
 else." 
 
 What would he have, then, in addition to the usual elements 
 of all education, and the teaching of philosophy and of virtue ? 
 He would have a man learn thoroughly his own language first, 
 and then that of his neighbour, regarding Greek and Latin as 
 ornamental merely. Little, however, did Montaigne think 
 that instruction, even in our own language, could degenerate 
 into what it has become in these latter days verbalism of 
 a kind much more offensive than any to be found in classical 
 teaching. He could not foresee detailed analysis of sentences, 
 and the dreary pedantry of the school grammars of our native 
 tongue. Paedagogic ingenuity had not yet invented such arid 
 substitutes for the substance and living form of our mother- 
 speech arch-enemies of true humanistic culture the logical 
 babblement of the primary school. Truly teachers have an 
 "infinite capacity for sinking." 
 
 Vernacular and modern languages once secured, Montaigne
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 109 
 
 would thereafter limit the course of study " to those things only 
 where a true and real utility and advantage are to be expected 
 and found. To teach a boy astronomy, for example, instead 
 of what will make him wise and good, is absurd. After you 
 have done this last, the pupil may be admitted to the elements 
 of geometry, rhetoric, logic, and physics ; and then the science 
 which his judgment most affects he will generally make his 
 own." But we must above all teach him " what it is to know 
 and what to be ignorant, what valour is, and temperance and 
 justice ; the difference between ambition and avarice, servitude 
 and subjection, licence and liberty ; in brief, season his under- 
 standing with that which regulates his manners and his sense, 
 that which teaches him to know himself, and how both well to 
 die and well to live. Over and above this, let us make a 
 selection of those subjects which directly and professedly serve 
 for the instruction and use of life." But the direct instruction 
 of the master is not all. "Human understanding is marvellously 
 enlightened by daily conversation with men, for we are other- 
 wise of ourselves so stupid as to have our sight limited to the 
 end of our own noses. One asking Socrates of what country 
 he was, he did not make answer 'of Athens,' but 'of the 
 world.' " We must learn to measure ourselves aright : " who- 
 soever shall represent to his fancy, as in a picture, that great 
 image of our mother Nature portrayed in her full majesty and 
 lustre, whoever in her face shall read her so universal and 
 constant variety, whoever shall observe himself, and not only 
 himself but a whole kingdom, no bigger than the least touch 
 or prick of a pencil in comparison with the whole, that man 
 alone is able to value things according to their true estimate 
 and grandeur." The great world is the mirror wherein we are 
 to behold ourselves, to be able to know ourselves as we ought 
 to do. History naturally suggests itself in this connexion as a 
 leading subject of study, for " thereby we converse with those 
 great and heroic souls of former and better ages " an empty 
 and an idle study as commonly conducted, but of "inestimable
 
 HO MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 fruit and value" when prosecuted with care and observation. 
 The object of history-teaching in the school is not facts, but 
 the appreciation of historical characters. 
 
 Meanwhile the body is not to be forgotten, for, not to 
 speak of the moral instruction which may be conveyed in 
 connexion with leaping, riding, wrestling etc., we have to 
 form the youth's outward fashion and mien at the same 
 time as his mind : for " 'tis not a soul, 'tis not a body we are 
 training only, but a man, and we ought not to divide him." 
 And, as Plato says, "we are not to fashion one without the 
 other, but make them draw together like two horses harnessed 
 to a coach." " It is not enough to fortify the soul : you are 
 also to make the sinews strong, for the soul will be oppressed 
 if not assisted by the bodily members, and would have too 
 hard a task to discharge two offices at once." Effeminacy in 
 food or clothes or habits is also to be eschewed. 
 
 So much for the end of education according to Montaigne, 
 and the materials of instruction whereby that end is to be 
 attained. Montaigne's public school, if he had to construct 
 one in these days, would certainly be somewhat after the fashion 
 of a German Real school, as regards its external organization, 
 and, so far, he is rightly named a realist. But the leading 
 purpose of all his instruction would essentially be ethical and 
 humanistic. The only respect in which his curriculum would 
 be realistic in the utilitarian meaning would be in the sub- 
 ordinate place assigned to Latin and Greek. So far is he from 
 being a Realist in the modern sense, that he may be rather set 
 down as an enemy of mere knowledge or information. " The 
 cares and expense our parents are at in our education, point at 
 nothing save to fill our heads with knowledge," he says, "but 
 not a word of judgment or virtue. We toil and labour to stuff 
 the memory, and in the mean time leave the conscience and the 
 understanding unfurnished void." 
 
 It has to be noted that Montaigne, and after him Milton 
 and Locke, think only of the education of the few and not of
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST III 
 
 the many of the sons of gentlemen only : but we may remark 
 that, while the extent to which school instruction is carried 
 depends for the most part on the social position of the parent, 
 the principles which regulate a prolonged education are equally 
 operative in the briefest, if they are worth anything at all as 
 principles. 
 
 Of equal importance with end and means is Method. On 
 this Montaigne has less to say, but what he says contains 
 probably the germs of the most important principles of all 
 method. 
 
 " 'Tis the custom of schoolmasters to be eternally thunder- 
 ing in their pupils' ears as if they were pouring into a funnel, 
 whilst the business of the pupil is simply to repeat what the 
 teacher has before said. I would have a tutor correct this 
 error, and at the very first he should, according to the capacity 
 he has to deal with, put it to the test, permitting his pupil 
 himself to taste and relish things and of himself to choose and 
 discern them, sometimes opening the way to him and some- 
 times making him break the ice himself; that is to say, I would 
 not have him alone to invent and speak, but also hear his 
 pupil invent and speak in his turn. Socrates, and since him 
 Arcesilaus, madeyf^/ 1 their scholars speak and then they spoke 
 to them. The authority of those who teach is very often an 
 impediment to those who desire to learn. It is good to make 
 the pupil, like a young horse, trot before the master, that he 
 may judge of his going and how much he, the master, is to 
 abate of his own speed to accommodate himself to the vigour 
 and capacity of his pupil. For want of this due proportion we 
 spoil all : to know how to adjust this and to keep within an 
 exact and due measure is one of the hardest things I know; 
 and it is an effect of a judicious and well-tempered soul to 
 know how to condescend to the boy's puerile movements and 
 to govern and direct them. Those who, according to our 
 common way of teaching, undertake with one and the same
 
 112 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 lesson and the same measure of direction to instruct several 
 boys of differing and unequal capacities, are infinitely mistaken 
 in their method; and at this rate it is no wonder if, in a 
 multitude of scholars, there are not found above two or three 
 who bring away any good account of their time and discipline." 
 Here we have the foreshadowing of the organization of instruc- 
 tion and the classification of pupils. The importance of 
 examination as a part of good method is also insisted on. 
 " Let the master," he says, " not only examine him about the 
 grammatical construction of the bare words of the lesson, but 
 about the sense and meaning of them, and let him judge of the 
 profit he has made, not by the testimony of his memory, but of 
 his understanding. Let him make the pupil put what he hath 
 learned into a hundred several forms, and accommodate it to 
 many subjects to see if he yet rightly comprehend it and have 
 made it his own, taking instruction in his progress from the 
 ' Institutions of Plato.' " " Tis a sign of crudity and in- 
 digestion," he says, " to vomit up what we eat in the same 
 condition it was swallowed down, and the stomach has not 
 performed its office unless it have altered the form and con- 
 dition of what was committed to it to concoct." " What is the 
 good of having the stomach full of meat if it do not nourish 
 us ? " Here we have what used to be called the " Intellectual 
 method " anticipated, the importance of assimilation enforced, 
 and the distinguishing characteristic of cram well exposed. 
 Montaigne, further, in opposition to theories of education still 
 current, advises that the pupil be made to sift and examine for 
 himself, and to accept nothing on mere authority. " We can 
 say, Cicero says thus : that these were the manners of Plato : 
 that these, again, are the very words of Aristotle : but what do 
 we say ourselves that is our own ? What do we do ? What do 
 we judge? A parrot would say as much." 
 
 So much for the method of intellectual instruction. The 
 method of moral teaching is summed up in the words that it 
 should " insensibly insinuate " itself in so far as it is direct, as
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 113 
 
 lessons do which are not set and formal, but suggested by time 
 and place. 
 
 Of intellectual and moral discipline, in the true sense of 
 that term, we find in Montaigne nothing. Nor does religion, 
 in any true sense, or a high ideal of personal life enter into 
 his scheme of education. And when we have said this, we 
 convict him of having left unwritten the two chief chapters in 
 educational theory. These grave omissions the character and 
 upbringing of the man would lead us to expect ; and we must 
 not quarrel with what we have, because it falls short of all our 
 demands. 
 
 With respect to Discipline, in the vulgar school sense that 
 is to say, the means taken to force boys to do what their masters 
 want them to do Montaigne takes up a position substantially 
 the same as that of the great majority of eminent writers on 
 education. He is persuaded that, by following a good method, 
 instruction will become pleasant, and that it will not be difficult 
 to allure the pupil to both wisdom and virtue. " If you do 
 not allure the appetite and affection, " he says, " you make 
 nothing but asses laden with books, and, by virtue of the lash, 
 give them their pocket full of learning to keep ; whereas, to do 
 well, you should not merely lodge it with them, but make 
 them to espouse it." Physical punishment fails of its aim, and 
 must fail by the nature of the case. If it be necessary at any 
 time to punish a child, it should be done when we are calm. 
 "No one," he says, "would hesitate to punish a judge with 
 death who should have condemned a prisoner in a fit of 
 passion. Why is it allowed any more to parents and masters 
 to beat and strike children in their anger? That is not 
 correction : it is revenge. Chastisement stands to children in 
 the place of medicine ; and should we endure a physician who 
 was angry and violent with his patient ? " " Education," he 
 says elsewhere, " should be carried on with a severe sweetness, 
 quite contrary to the practice of our pedants, who, instead of 
 L. 8
 
 114 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 tempting and alluring children to letters by apt and gentle 
 ways, do, in truth, present nothing before them but rods and 
 ferules, horror and cruelty. Away with this violence ! away 
 with this compulsion ! than which nothing, I certainly believe, 
 more dulls and degenerates a well-descended nature. If you 
 would have the pupil alive to shame and chastisement, do not 
 harden him to them. . . . The strict government of most of 
 our colleges has even more displeased me ; and peradventure 
 they might have erred less perniciously on the indulgent side. 
 The school is the true house of correction of imprisoned 
 youth. . . . Do but come in, when they are about their 
 lesson, and you shall hear nothing but the outcries of boys 
 under execution, with the thundering noise of their pedagogues, 
 drunk with fury, to make up the concert. A very pretty way 
 this to tempt these tender and timorous souls to love their 
 book with a furious countenance and a rod in hand ! A 
 cursed and pernicious way of proceeding ! . . . How much 
 more decent would it be to see their classes strewn with green 
 leaves and fine flowers, than with the bloody stumps of birch 
 and willows ! Were it left to my ordering, I would paint the 
 school with the pictures of Joy and Gladness, Flora and the 
 Graces, that where the profit of the pupils is, there might their 
 pleasure also be." 
 
 We are all of Montaigne's opinion nowadays ; for he did 
 not forbid punishment or coercion, in some form or other, 
 when all other means failed. Extrema in extremis. He 
 merely protested against the scholastic tyranny of his time (and 
 we may say of all time, as may be learned from almost every 
 writer on education for the last 2000 years) a tyranny still 
 existing, and till lately prevalent. Slave-driver and school- 
 master were almost convertible terms. The school and the 
 rod were ideas of inseparable association. Samuel Butler calls 
 " whipping " 
 
 " Virtue's governess, 
 Tutoress of arts and sciences."
 
 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST I 15 
 
 "Oh ! ye" (says Byron) "who teach the ingenuous youth of nations, 
 
 Holland, France, England, Germany, and Spain, 
 I pray ye flog them upon all occasions : 
 It mends the morals ; never mind the pain." 
 
 Thomas Hood, again, in looking back on his school-days, 
 recalls chiefly his floggings ; and yet his pleasant humour can 
 call up some sentimental regret : 
 
 "Ay, though the very birch's smart 
 Should mark those hours again, 
 I'd kiss the rod, and be resigned 
 Beneath the stroke, and even find 
 Some sugar in the cane." 
 
 The subject, however, is too serious for jocular treatment. 
 Before Montaigne's day, and long after it, the brutality of school- 
 masters was such as to leave an almost indelible stain on the 
 profession. The whole body should make an annual pilgrim- 
 age of penitence for the sins of their predecessors. School- 
 masters are now beginning to understand that it is only by 
 balanced temper and by sound method that they can dispense 
 with physical motives, and out of the more or less contemptible 
 " dominie " of the past, evolve the educator of the future. In 
 no other way certainly can they make good their claim to that 
 social position which they, often too morbidly, claim. A mere 
 castigator pueronim has no claim to anything save his wages, 
 which should be the minimum for which he can be hired. 
 
 Montaigne's educational views were defective, certainly, 
 though in substance and in their main purpose sound. The 
 defects, as before observed, may be traced to his own upbring- 
 ing and character. Everything with him is too easy. Wisdom's 
 ways, alas ! are not always ways of pleasantness, nor are her 
 paths always those of peace. The easy and harmonious way 
 of life of Montaigne is for a few fortunate souls only. We 
 have to train our boys to work hard, to will vigorously, to be 
 much in earnest, to have a high sense of duty. Such qualities 
 do not come by wishing. By intellectual and moral discipline, 
 
 82
 
 Il6 MONTAIGNE, THE FRENCH RATIONALIST 
 
 by inducing him to do what may be disagreeable, by requiring 
 obedience, by enforcement of law, we have to mould our 
 British boy. For all this kind of work Montaigne has little to 
 teach us ; but we can learn much from him, and we part from 
 the wise and kindly Frenchman with gratitude, and even 
 affection. 
 
 To one taking a survey of the history of education it is 
 interesting to note that Montaigne was brought up in a 
 Humanistic school taught by men who stood high in Europe 
 as Humanists, and yet he has nothing but hard words for the 
 system. When Montaigne was at school, Humanism in 
 education was at high tide north of the Alps. We may 
 learn from him that the revival was restricted in its aims and 
 not wholly successful. As I have said elsewhere : a simpler 
 grammar than that popular in previous centuries and the 
 substitution of classical Latin authors for bad Latin and a 
 little Greek sums up the revival so far as all save a few schools 
 were concerned. They still had much to learn from Quintilian, 
 of whom Montaigne sometimes reminds us. An important 
 advance had been made, but containing in it the seeds of 
 relapse. For even with an improved grammar, abstract rules 
 and the study of words for their own sake would still hold 
 sway, and when the freshness of the new movement had worn 
 off the inevitable result would be the restoration of the rule and 
 the whip. The only true and permanent reform of education 
 must comprehend not only a reform of Method but a school 
 of Method at our universities. The need of a method well 
 thought out was felt as we have seen by Ascham, but it was not 
 till Bacon arose that method on a scientific basis became 
 possible.
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, 
 FROM 1600 A.D.
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, FROM 1600 A.D. 
 
 THE characteristics of what may be called the Modern Period 
 in education are I think the following : 
 
 i st. Belief in the power of mere knowledge to educate the 
 human mind. 
 
 and. A tendency to exalt the sense-realistic, and conse- 
 quently to advocate the study of physical science as opposed 
 to the Humanities. 
 
 3rd. The application of the inductive method to in- 
 struction. 
 
 These doctrines of the Modern School of Naturalists derive 
 themselves from the Baconian philosophic movement, although 
 Bacon himself would be the first to repudiate its advocates as 
 his legitimate descendants. It is only in recent years that they 
 have had any success. Conservative narrowness has held the 
 citadel of the Schools against the equally narrow aggressiveness 
 of the Liberals. In the impending reorganization of educational 
 systems, the victory will go to neither party. 
 
 FRANCIS BACON, 15611626. 
 
 In 1605 there appeared a book which was destined to 
 place educational method on a scientific foundation, although 
 its mission is not yet, it is true, accomplished. This was 
 Francis Bacon's Advancement of Learning, which was followed,
 
 120 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 some years later, by the Organon. For some time the 
 thoughts of men had been turning to the study of Nature. 
 Bacon represented this movement, and gave it the necessary 
 impulse by his masterly survey of the domain of human 
 knowledge, his pregnant suggestions, and his formulation, 
 imperfect as it was, of scientific method. Bacon was not 
 aware of his relations to the science and art of Education ; he 
 praises the Jesuit schools, not knowing that he was by his 
 philosophy subverting their very foundations. We know 
 inductively : that was the sum of Bacon's teaching. In the 
 sphere of outer Nature, the scholastic saying, Nihil est in 
 intellect u quod non prius fuerit in sensu, was accepted, but with 
 this addition, that the impressions on our senses were not 
 themselves to be trusted. The mode of verifying sense- 
 impressions, and the grounds of valid and necessary inference, 
 had to be investigated and applied. The educational bearing 
 of this is manifest ; for it is clear that if we can tell how it is we 
 know, it follows that the method of intellectual instruction is 
 scientifically settled. 
 
 Bacon himself says, writing to Lord Burleigh in 1592, " I 
 have as vast contemplative ends as I have moderate civil ends, 
 for I have taken all knowledge to be my province ; and if I 
 could purge it of two sorts of rovers, whereof the one with 
 frivolous disputations, confutations and verbosities (the school- 
 men), the other with blind experiments and auricular traditions 
 and impostures (unmethodical investigators, e.g. alchemists, 
 astrologers, etc.) hath committed so many spoils, I hope I 
 should bring in industrious observations and profitable inven- 
 tions and discoveries the best state of that province. This... 
 is so fixed in my mind that it cannot be removed." And in 
 
 his letter to Toby Matthews in 1609 he says, " the 
 
 question between me and the ancients is not of the virtue of 
 the race, but of the Tightness of the way." As the philosopher 
 of Realism and of the Inductive method, Bacon, it may be, 
 only summed up the thoughts and practice of several pre-
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 121 
 
 decessors ; but he was the man of genius who (as frequently 
 happens) gathered up those hints, anticipations and aspirations 
 which constitute a " tendency," and gave them shape. 
 
 In the department of education one of the chief services 
 Bacon rendered was his including it among the sciences to be 
 studied. It was by him called " tradition " the handing down 
 of the acquired intellectual possessions of mankind to those 
 who are to be our successors. But this was not all; for, in 
 speaking of this subject, he was naturally influenced by the 
 new gospel of the real of the founding of knowledge on 
 seeing for ourselves what was there before us, and basing our 
 conclusions on accurate observation, and a sound method of 
 rational procedure. Nature was no longer to be studied by 
 means of divisions and definitions of hastily formed concepts, 
 and compelled to fit itself into premature axioms in which the 
 very processes of nature were forestalled. Generalization was 
 to follow only in the wake of carefully observed facts. " Man," 
 he says, in the Novum Organum, " who is the servant and 
 interpreter of Nature, can act and understand no further than 
 he has, either in operation or contemplation, observed of the 
 method or order of Nature." And again, " Men have sought 
 to make a world from their own conceptions and to draw from 
 their own minds all the materials which they employed ; but if 
 instead of doing so, they had consulted experience and obser- 
 vation, they would have had facts and not opinions to reason 
 about, and might have ultimately arrived at the knowledge of 
 the laws which govern the material world. ... Thus they may 
 
 hope to arrive at principles luminous and well defined, 
 
 such as Nature herself will not refuse to acknowledge." But 
 Bacon did not invent Induction any more than he invented 
 the human mind ; he, however, unquestionably gave to the 
 world the Logic of Induction and formulated the practice 
 of Galilei and the premonitions of Da Vinci. He was, 
 as Isaac Walton called him, " the great secretary of Nature 
 and Science."
 
 122 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 To speak of the Baconian induction as Goethe did, is to 
 misapprehend it. It is true that to the man of genius one 
 fact is worth a thousand to the uninspired laboratory hodman, 
 and that the laborious collection and comparison of "instances " 
 is not always necessary. On the other hand, it is equally true 
 that the flashes of insight, which enable a great man to put his 
 finger on the true cause and ultimate generalization in any 
 department of knowledge, are simply swift anticipatory in- 
 ductive processes. Nor will any "flash of insight" ever be 
 accepted by the world as objective truth, until it has been 
 indirectly verified and established by the reverse process of 
 Deduction that is to say, by applying the supreme generaliza- 
 tion to the elucidation of lower generalizations, and ultimately 
 of individual facts, thereby showing that it truly explains them 
 by containing them. 
 
 Bacon was not in his reform of Method thinking of 
 psychology and the manner in which the mind attains to 
 knowledge : he had his eye fixed chiefly on the matter itself 
 of knowledge, and he saw that it was inductively, and by 
 various steps of inductive activity, that what was presented 
 to the senses received its verification. This, and this only, 
 was the way in which we knew a thing for certain. It no 
 doubt followed from this that we should teach inductively ; but 
 it was to Bacon's successors that we owe the full exposition of 
 what was implicit in Bacon's thought. Bacon and his school 
 were thus, I hold, the founders of modern method in educa- 
 tion not as based- on reflective psychology, but rather as 
 revealed by the actual process whereby the truth of things was 
 ascertained. He looked at the matter of thought, not at the 
 thinking process. A more advanced psychology claims in these 
 days to ground the realistic or inductive method of inquiry and 
 instruction on a study of abstract mind itself, on a criticism of 
 knowing, and so to extend its sphere and supplement its defects. 
 
 Bacon and the Baconians, in short, occupied themselves 
 with the Content, not the pure Form, of Thought, and found
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 123 
 
 their method in the way in which things were truly known. 
 They fixed their attention on things as growing into the 
 thought or truth of themselves in our minds, not on thought 
 or thinking as such. 
 
 We thus find in Bacon the pregnant seeds of reforms both 
 as regards the substance and method of education. He 
 attacks the universities as still the home of scholastic traditions 
 and futile sophistries ; he sketches a pansophic ideal ; 
 he points to the importance of method ; he recognizes 
 teachers as students of an Art ; he points the way to 
 realistic studies : above all, he has faith in the future. It 
 is these ideas which we find taking practical shape in 
 his successors. 
 
 Allowing all possible credit to his precursors, Ludovicus 
 Vives, Da Vinci, Galilei and others (and to certain contempo- 
 raries whom he strangely ignores), we yet recognize in Bacon 
 the true Father of Modern Method. He represents the 
 transition from the old world to the new, and more than any 
 other man is to be revered as the " first of the Moderns " ; and 
 this not only in the large sphere of investigation generally, but 
 in the narrower sphere of the School, with which we have here 
 to do. That we now enter on the distinctively " modern " 
 period of European intellectual activity is sufficiently attested 
 by the great names in every department of investigation. It 
 was not by accident, but rather in accordance with the natural 
 evolution of mind, that we find almost as contemporaries Galilei, 
 Bacon, Descartes, Boyle, Kepler, and Hugo Grotius. 
 
 It seems to me that, while we certainly fail to find in 
 Bacon a developed system of education correlated with the 
 method of the sciences, we yet encounter in the Advancement 
 of Learning, in the conclusion of the sixth book of the De 
 Augmentis (the Latin translation of the Advancement extended), 
 in the Essay on Studies, and in the letter to Savile (Provost of 
 Eton), many pregnant hints which suggest a method, as well as
 
 124 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 a curriculum, of instruction. In the De Augmentis, for example, 
 he gives the preference to the teacher who " transplants know- 
 ledge into the scholar's mind as it grew in his own." "A 
 gardener, again," he says, " takes more pains with the young 
 than with the full-grown plant, and men commonly find it 
 needful in any undertaking to begin well." And on the 
 training of teachers he adds, " We give scarce a thought to our 
 teachers and care little for what they may be ; and yet we are 
 for ever complaining because rulers are rigid in the matter of 
 laws and penalties, but indifferent to the right training of the 
 young." The importance of proceeding from the more easy to 
 the more difficult in learning, and the mental effects of different 
 kinds of studies, are also adverted to. And as to subjects, it 
 was no difficult matter for his followers to recognize in their 
 master an advocate for realities in the school : " Be not wrapt 
 up in the past ; there is an actual present lying all about you, 
 look up, and behold it in its grandeur." 
 
 If encyclopaedism or pansophy, that is to say, the correlation 
 of sciences in a unity as taught in that encyclopaedic university 
 of which Bacon has a brilliant vision in the New Atlantis, was 
 the ultimate resting-place of the adult mind, it was only one 
 step to the conclusion that the education of the young should 
 be so begun and conducted as to lead to this Great Temple 
 of all Knowledge. A broad realistic foundation was thus 
 necessary. Education he calls an " early custom " ; it is all 
 important then that the custom should be a wise custom from 
 the beginning. Here we have the germ of much in Co- 
 menius. 
 
 We read the history of educational thought in its relation 
 to wider movements with small intelligence, if we do not see in 
 Bacon the gatherings of the fruits of the renaissance movement 
 in so far as it was a study of the realities both of things and 
 thoughts, a groping after reality both in science, philosophy 
 and literature ; and further, detect in all this a formulation 
 of intellectual Protestantism. Authority, as such, was not in
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 125 
 
 precise terms set aside, but its doom was fixed wherever the 
 New Method was heartily accepted. The truth, as founded on 
 an ever-fresh and an ever-growing study of the facts of nature 
 and mind, was now and henceforth to be the sole aim of 
 thinkers in every field of inquiry. The opinions of Colet, 
 More, and Erasmus were about to become the convictions of 
 all educated men, but now carried into spheres of thought 
 which these men had not contemplated. Authority, tradition, 
 even revelation had all to be thrown into the melting-pot, not 
 by an individual here and there in advance of his time as in 
 the previous centuries, but by the method and general consen- 
 sus of the age. Thus it is that we, for the most part, find an 
 intense Protestant feeling in those who advocated educational 
 reform in the method and substance of instruction on Baconian 
 lines. Ratke and Comenius are in scholastic matters repre- 
 sentative of the school of Bacon in a wider than in a school 
 sense. They are the reformers of the schools, it is true, but 
 always with an eye to social and ecclesiastical, if not also 
 political, changes. The Humanists, on the contrary, after 
 their first efflorescence, ranged themselves with the conservative 
 reaction, and Loyola himself found no difficulty in annexing 
 much of their territory in the interests of Obscurantism. 
 
 We need not fear the result of this free investigation. So 
 long as the recognition of the fact that the true life of man is 
 a life in the ideals which we call philosophy and literature 
 survives, the purpose of education will be found where the true 
 life of man himself lies ; that is to say, in philosophy and 
 literature. The past, accordingly, will for ever retain its hold. 
 It is essential that it should do so, if humanity is not to revert 
 to barbarism. 1 
 
 I think I shall now best serve the student of education by 
 bringing together those passages in Bacon which give a general 
 indication of his contribution to the subject. 
 
 1 Every student of Education should read the Advancement of Learning 
 (Aldis Wright's Edition).
 
 126 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 UNIVERSITIES, ETC. 
 
 " First therefore, amongst so many great foundations of 
 colleges in Europe, I find strange that they are all dedicated 
 to professions, and none left free to arts and sciences at 
 large. For if men judge that learning should be referred to 
 action, they judge well ; but in this they fall into the error 
 described in the ancient fable, in which the other parts of 
 the body did suppose the stomach had been idle, because it 
 neither performed the orifice of motion, as the limbs do, nor 
 of sense, as the head doth : but yet notwithstanding it is the 
 stomach that digesteth and distributeth to all the rest. So 
 if any man think philosophy and universality to be idle 
 studies, he doth not consider that all professions are from 
 thence served and supplied. And this I take to be a great 
 cause that hath hindered the progression of learning, because 
 these fundamental knowledges have been studied but in 
 passage. For if you will have a tree bear more fruit than it 
 hath used to do, it is not anything you can do to the boughs, 
 but it is the stirring of the earth and putting new mould 
 about the roots that must work it. Neither is it to be for- 
 gotten, that this dedicating of foundations and dilations to 
 professory learning hath not only had a malign aspect and 
 influence upon the growth of sciences, but hath also been 
 prejudicial to states and governments. For hence it pro- 
 ceedeth that princes find a solitude in regard of able men to 
 serve them in causes of estate, because there is no education 
 collegiate which is free; where such as were so disposed 
 mought give themselves to histories, modern languages, books 
 of policy and civil discourse, and other the like enablements 
 unto service of estate. 
 
 " And because founders of colleges do plant, and founders 
 of lectures do water, it followeth well in order to speak of 
 the defect which is in public lectures ; namely, in the small- 
 ness and meanness of the salary or reward which in most
 
 127 
 
 places is assigned unto them ; whether they be lectures of 
 arts, or of professions. For it is necessary to the progression 
 of sciences that readers be of the most able and sufficient 
 men ; as those which are ordained for generating and propa- 
 gating of sciences, and not for transitory use. This cannot 
 be, except their condition and endowment be such as may 
 content the ablest man to appropriate his whole labour and 
 continue his whole age in that function and attendance ; 
 and therefore must have a proportion answerable to that 
 mediocrity or competency of advancement, which may be 
 expected from a profession or the practice of a profession. 
 So as, if you will have sciences flourish, you must observe 
 David's military law, which was, That those which staid with 
 the carriage shoitld have equal part with those which were in 
 the action; else will the carriages be ill attended. So readers 
 in sciences are indeed the guardians of the stores and 
 provisions of sciences, whence men in active courses are 
 furnished, and therefore ought to have equal entertainment 
 with them ; otherwise if the fathers in sciences be of the 
 weakest sort or be ill maintained, 
 
 Et patrum invalid! referent jejunia nati. 
 
 " And therefore inasmuch as most of the usages and 
 orders of the universities were derived from more obscure 
 times, it is the more requisite they be re-examined. In this 
 kind I will give an instance or two, for example sake, of 
 things that are the most obvious and familiar. The one is a 
 matter, which though it be ancient and general, yet I hold 
 to be an error; which is that scholars in universities come 
 too soon and too unripe to logic and rhetoric, arts fitter for 
 graduates than children and novices. For these two, rightly 
 taken, are the gravest of sciences, being the arts of arts ; the 
 one for judgement, the other for ornament. And they be 
 the rules and directions how to set forth and dispose matter : 
 and therefore for minds empty and unfraught with matter,
 
 128 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 and which have not gathered that which Cicero calleth sylra 
 and supellex, stuff and variety, to begin with those arts (as 
 if one should learn to weigh, or to measure, or to paint the 
 wind) doth work but this effect, that the wisdom of those arts, 
 which is great and universal, is almost made contemptible, 
 and is degenerate into childish sophistry and ridiculous 
 affectation. And further, the untimely learning of them hath 
 drawn on by consequence the superficial and unprofitable 
 teaching and writing of them, as fitteth indeed to the capacity 
 of children. Another is a lack I find in the exercises used 
 in the universities, which do make too great a divorce 
 between invention and memory. For their speeches are 
 either premeditate, in verbis conceptis, where nothing is left 
 to invention, or merely extemporal, where little is left to 
 memory. Whereas in life and action there is least use of 
 either of these, but rather of intermixtures of premeditation 
 and invention, notes and memory. So as the exercise fitteth 
 not the practice, nor the image the life ; and it is ever a true 
 rule in exercises, that they be framed as near as may be to 
 the life of practice ; for otherwise they do pervert the motions 
 and faculties of the mind, and not prepare them. The truth 
 whereof is not obscure, when scholars come to the practices 
 of professions, or other actions of civil life ; which when they 
 set into, this want is soon found by themselves, and sooner 
 by others." 
 
 ****** 
 
 "Another defect which I note, ascendeth a little higher 
 than the precedent. For as the proficience of learning con- 
 sisteth much in the orders and institutions of universities in 
 the same states and kingdoms, so it would be yet more 
 advanced, if there were more intelligence mutual between the 
 universities of Europe than now there is. We see there be 
 many orders and foundations, which though they be divided 
 under several sovereignties and territories, yet they take 
 themselves to have a kind of contract, fraternity, and
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 129 
 
 correspondence one with the other, insomuch as they have 
 provincials and generals. And surely as nature createth 
 brotherhood in families, and arts mechanical contract brother- 
 hoods in communalities, and the anointment of God superin- 
 duceth a brotherhood in kings and bishops, so in like manner 
 there cannot but be a fraternity in learning and illumination, 
 relating to that paternity which is attributed to God, who is 
 called the Father of illuminations or lights. 
 
 " The last defect which I will note is, that there hath not 
 been, or very rarely been, any public designation of writers 
 or inquirers concerning such parts of knowledge as may 
 appear not to have been already sufficiently laboured or 
 undertaken ; unto which point it is an inducement to enter 
 into a view and examination what parts of learning have 
 been prosecuted, and what omitted. For the opinion of 
 plenty is amongst the causes of want, and the great quantity 
 of books maketh a show rather of superfluity than lack; 
 which surcharge nevertheless is not to be remedied by making 
 no more books, but by making more good books, which, 
 as the serpent of Moses, mought devour the serpents of the 
 enchanters 1 ." 
 
 Elsewhere, speaking of universities, he says : 
 
 " As water, whether it be the dew of Heaven or the springs 
 of the earth, doth scatter and lose itself in the ground, except 
 it be collected into some receptacle where it may by union 
 comfort and sustain itself; and for that cause the industry 
 of man hath framed and made spring-heads, conduits, cisterns 
 and pools ; which men have accustomed likewise to beautify 
 and adorn with accomplishments of magnificence and state 
 as well as of use and necessity; so knowledge whether it 
 descend from divine inspiration or spring from human sense, 
 would soon perish and vanish to oblivion if it were not 
 
 1 Advancement of Learning, pp. 78 83 (Aldis Wright's Edition). 
 L. 9
 
 130 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 preserved in books 1 , traditions, conferences and places ap- 
 pointed as universities, colleges and schools for the receipt 
 and comforting the same." 
 
 In the above passages Bacon has always in his eye the 
 scientific encyclopaedia. And again in his New Atlantis Bacon 
 returns to the consideration of the same subject, "the 
 amplification of the power and kingdom of mankind over 
 the world " ; and in the Address made to the traveller by the 
 Father of Solomon's House we get some idea of the vastness 
 of his academic scheme. He says : 
 
 " God bless thee, my son ; I will give thee the greatest 
 jewel I have. For I will impart unto thee, for the love of 
 God and men, a relation of the true state of Solomon's House. 
 Son, to make you know the true state of Solomon's House, 
 I will keep this order. First, I will set forth unto you the 
 end of our foundation. Secondly, the preparations and in- 
 struments we have for our works. Thirdly, the several 
 employments and functions whereto our fellows are assigned. 
 And fourthly, the ordinances and rites which we observe. 
 
 "The End of our Foundation is the knowledge of the 
 Causes, and secret motions of things; and the enlarging of 
 the bounds of Human Empire, to the effecting of all things 
 possible." 
 
 He then proceeds to develope his conception of a great 
 Institution devoted to Knowledge with a view always to the 
 benefits thereby to be conferred on mankind ; and it is no 
 exaggeration to say that were all the Universities, Technical 
 Colleges, Laboratories, Botanic and Zoological Gardens of 
 Europe and America rolled into one, Bacon's great pansophic 
 ideal would even then be only approximately attained. 
 
 1 Libraries, he says, are as the shrines where all the relics of the 
 ancient saints, full of true virtue and that without delusion and imposture, 
 are preserved and reposed.
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 131 
 
 Writing on the education of Youth to Sir Henry Savill 1 , 
 he expounds his views as to the 
 
 Power of Education. 
 
 " But certain it is, whether it be believed or no, that as 
 the most excellent of metals, gold, is of all other the most 
 pliant and most enduring to be wrought ; so of all living and 
 breathing substances, the perfectest (Man) is the most sus- 
 ceptible of help, improvement, impression, and alteration. 
 And not only in his body, but in his mind and spirit. And 
 there again not only in his appetite and affection, but in his 
 power of wit and reason." 
 
 ***** 
 
 "And as to the will of man, it is that which is most 
 maniable and obedient; as that which admitteth most medi- 
 cines to cure and alter it. The most sovereign of all is 
 Religion, which is able to change and transform it in the 
 deepest and most inward inclinations and motions. And 
 next to that is Opinion and Apprehension ; whether it be 
 infused by tradition and institution, or wrought in by dis- 
 putation and persuasion. And the third is example, which 
 transformeth the will of man into the similitude of that which 
 is much observant and familiar towards it. And the fourth 
 is, when one affection is healed and corrected by another; 
 as when cowardice is remedied by shame and dishonour, or 
 sluggishness and backwardness by indignation and emulation ; 
 and so of the like. And lastly, when all these means, or 
 any of them, have new framed or formed human will, then 
 doth custom and habit corroborate and confirm all the rest. 
 Therefore it is no marvel though this faculty of the mind 
 of will and election, which inclineth affection and appetite, 
 being but the inceptions and rudiments of will, may be so 
 well governed and managed, because it admitteth access to 
 
 1 Vol. VII. p. 99 (Spedding's Edition). 
 
 92
 
 132 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 so divers remedies to be applied to it and to work upon it. 
 The effects whereof are so many and so known as require 
 no enumeration ; but generally they do issue, as medicines 
 do, into two kinds of cures ; whereof the one is a just or true 
 cure, and the other is called palliation." 
 
 Method generally. 
 
 Exercises. " That exercises are to be framed to the life ; 
 that is to say, to work ability in that kind, whereof a man in 
 the course of actions shall have most use. 
 
 " The indirect and oblique exercises which do per paries 
 and per consequentiam inable those faculties, which perhaps 
 direct exercise at first, would but distort. And those have 
 chiefly place where the faculty is weak not per se but per 
 acridens. As if want of memory grow through lightness of 
 wit and want of stayed attention, then the mathematics or 
 the law helpeth ; because they are things wherein if the mind 
 once roam it cannot recover. 
 
 " Of the cautions of exercise ; as to beware lest by evil 
 doing, as all beginners do weakly, a man grow and be inveter- 
 ate in an ill habit ; and so take not the advantage of custom in 
 perfection, but in confirming ill." 
 
 Order of Exercises. "The marshalling and sequel of 
 sciences and practices : Logic and Rhetoric should be used 
 to be read after Poesy, History, and Philosophy. First 
 exercise to do things well and clean ; after, promptly and 
 readily." 
 
 In the Advancement of Learning 1 we find pertinent advice 
 on the order and method in the study of Authors. 
 
 "There remain two appendices touching the tradition of 
 knowledge, the one critical, the other pedantical. For all 
 knowledge is either delivered by teachers, or attained by 
 
 1 p. i8r (Aldis Wright's Edition).
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 133 
 
 men's proper endeavours; and therefore as the principal 
 part of tradition of knowledge concerneth chiefly writing of 
 books, so the relative part thereof concerneth reading of 
 books; whereunto appertain incidently these considerations. 
 The first is concerning the true correction and edition of 
 authors ; wherein nevertheless rash diligence hath done great 
 prejudice. For these critics have often presumed that that 
 which they understand not is false set down : as the priest 
 that, where he found it written of S. Paul Demissus est per 
 sportam, mended his book, and made it Demissus est per 
 portam ; because sporta was an hard word, and out of his 
 reading : and surely their errors, though they be not so 
 palpable and ridiculous, yet are of the same kind. And 
 therefore, as it hath been wisely noted, the most corrected 
 copies are commonly the least correct. 
 
 " The second is concerning the exposition and explication 
 of authors, which resteth in annotations and commentaries : 
 wherein it is over usual to blanch the obscure places and 
 discourse upon the plain. 
 
 " The third is concerning the times, which in many cases 
 give great light to true interpretations. 
 
 " The fourth is concerning some brief censure and judgment 
 of the authors ; that men thereby may take some election unto 
 themselves what books to read. 
 
 "And the fifth is concerning the syntax and disposition 
 of studies ; that men may know in what order or pursuit to 
 read. 
 
 " For pedantical knowledge, it containeth that difference 
 of tradition which is proper for youth ; whereunto appertain 
 divers considerations of great fruit. 
 
 " As first, the timing and seasoning of knowledges ; as with 
 what to initiate them, and from what for a time to refrain 
 them. 
 
 "Secondly, the consideration where to begin with the 
 easiest, and so proceed to the more difficult ; and in what
 
 134 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 courses to press the more difficult, and then to turn them to 
 the more easy : for it is one method to practise swimming 
 with bladders, and another to practise dancing with heavy 
 shoes. 
 
 " A third is the application of learning according unto the 
 propriety of the wits; for there is no defect in the faculties 
 intellectual, but seemeth to have a proper cure contained in 
 some studies : as, for example, if a child be bird-witted, that 
 is, hath not the faculty of attention, the mathematics giveth 
 a remedy thereunto ; for in them, if the wit be caught away 
 but a moment, one is new to begin. And as sciences have a 
 propriety towards faculties for cure and help, so faculties or 
 powers have a sympathy towards sciences for excellency 
 or speedy profiting : and therefore it is an inquiry of great 
 wisdom, what kinds of wits and natures are most apt and 
 proper for what sciences. 
 
 " Fourthly, the ordering of exercises is matter of great 
 consequence to hurt or help : for, as is well observed by 
 Cicero, men in exercising their faculties, if they be not well 
 advised, do exercise their faults and get ill habits as well as 
 good ; so as there is a great judgment to be had in the 
 continuance and intermission of exercises. It were too long 
 to particularize a number of other considerations of this 
 nature, things but of mean appearance, but of singular 
 efficacy. For as the wronging or cherishing of seeds or 
 young plants is that that is most important to their thriving, 
 and as it was noted that the first six kings being in truth as 
 tutors of the state of Rome in the infancy thereof was the 
 principal cause of the immense greatness of that state which 
 followed, so the culture and manurance of minds in youth 
 hath such a forcible (though unseen) operation, as hardly 
 any length of time or contention of labour can countervail it 
 afterwards." 
 
 In the above quotations we find the prognostication of 
 many much-needed educational reforms. It was not, however,
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 135 
 
 within Bacon's purpose to elaborate his views in their specific 
 relation to the ordinary school. This, as regards Method 
 at least, was left to Ratke. 
 
 Bacon represented not only the longing for a new Method 
 and for the co-ordination of the sciences ; but also the 
 weariness of words and phrases and vain subtleties which 
 had been gradually recovering their old place in spite of 
 Rabelais, Montaigne, Ludovicus Vives, Erasmus, and Ascham. 
 The poets, also, had been placing Nature before the minds 
 of men in a new aspect. The Humanists, while unquestion- 
 ably improving the aims and procedure of education, had 
 been powerless to prevent the tendency to fall once more 
 under the dominion of words, and to revert to mere gram- 
 matical and rhetorical form. The realism of human life 
 and thought, which constituted their raison d'etre, had been 
 unable to sustain itself as a principle of action, because, as 
 we have seen, there was no school of method. It was the 
 study of the realities of sense that was finally to place 
 education on a scientific basis, and make reaction, as to 
 method, impossible, at least in so far as thinkers were 
 concerned. 
 
 The thought of any age determines the education of the 
 age which is to succeed it. Education follows, it does not 
 lead. The School and the Church alike march in the wake 
 of science, philosophy, and political ideas. We see this 
 illustrated in every epoch of human history, and in none 
 so conspicuously as in the changes which occurred in the 
 philosophy and education of ancient Rome during the lifetime 
 of the elder Cato, and, in modern times, during the revival 
 of letters and the subsequent rise of the Baconian induction. 
 It is impossible, indeed, for any great movement of thought 
 to find acceptance without its telling to some extent on every 
 department of the body politic. Its influence on the ideas 
 entertained as to the education of the rising generation 
 must be, above all, distinct and emphatic. Every philosophi-
 
 136 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 
 
 cal writer on political science has recognized this, and has 
 felt the vast significance of the educational system of a 
 country both as an effect the consequence of a revolution 
 in thought and as a cause, a moving force of incalculable 
 power in the future life of a commonwealth. Thus it was 
 that the Humanistic movement which preceded and accom- 
 panied the Reformation of religion shook to its centre the 
 mediaeval school-system of Europe ; and that subsequently 
 the silent rise of the inductive spirit began to subvert its 
 very foundations. 
 
 Bacon, though not himself a Realist in the modern and 
 abused sense of that term, was the father of Realism. It 
 was this side of his teaching which was greedily seized upon, 
 and even exaggerated. Educational zeal now ran in this 
 channel. The conviction of the Churches of the time, that 
 one can make men what one pleases (by fair means or 
 foul), was shared by the innovators. The method which 
 could conquer all knowledge could also train the knowing 
 powers and mould the whole man. By education, rightly 
 conceived and rightly applied, the fervent successors of Bacon 
 dreamed that they could manufacture men ; and, in point of 
 fact, the Jesuits had shown that a good deal could be done in 
 this direction. The new enthusiasts failed to see that the genius 
 of Protestantism is the genius of freedom, and that man refuses 
 to be manufactured except on suicidal terms. He must first 
 sacrifice that which is his distinctive title to manhood his 
 personality. That the prophets of educational Realism should 
 have failed to see this is not to be laid at their door as a fault : 
 it merely shows that they belonged to their own time and not 
 to ours. They failed then, as some fail now, to understand 
 man and his education, because they break with the 
 past. The record of the past is with them, as it was with 
 the Baconian realists, merely a record of blunders. The 
 modern Humanist more wisely accepts it as the storehouse 
 of the thoughts and life of human reason. In the life of Man
 
 THE MODERN PERIOD, BACON 137 
 
 each individual of the race best finds his own true life. 
 This is modern Humanism the Realism of thought. Let 
 us not, however, confound Bacon with his bastard children 
 in these days. He would not have acknowledged them. 
 
 Let us at the same time freely grant that it is to the 
 Sense-realists of the earlier half of the seventeenth century 
 that we owe the scientific foundations of educational method, 
 and the only indication of the true line of answer to the 
 complaints of the time.
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST AND 
 FOUNDER OF METHOD 1 . 
 
 (d. 1671.) 
 
 IN March, 1892, three hundred years had elapsed since 
 Comenius was born. The whole educational world was alive 
 to the fact, and in Germany and America the day was widely 
 celebrated, although forty years ago the name of Comenius was 
 known only to an historical student here and there ; and 
 that, chiefly as associated with an illustrated school-book, the 
 Orbis Pictus*. 
 
 It is not universally true that writers of genuine original 
 vein suffer neglect during their lifetime. Much depends on the 
 position of social authority which they may hold, or on their 
 power of fitting their fresh thought to the forms of expression 
 current in their time. It cannot be said that Comenius, 
 though an unsuccessful man, as all men of ideas are, failed to 
 interest and attract his contemporaries : on the contrary, his 
 two chief school-books were enormously popular ; but he was 
 
 1 A memorial address for the three-hundredth anniversary of his birth. 
 Delivered in Edinburgh and Birmingham. 
 
 The predecessor of Comenius was the Baconian Wolfgang Ratke, 
 
 2 A full account of Comenius's work on Education and a sufficient 
 account of Ratke will be found in my Life of Comenius.
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 139 
 
 scarcely dead when his name and reputation died also. That 
 in him which was specially original was precisely that which 
 most of all fell into oblivion. Bayle, in his " Dictionary " 
 (1695), speaks of him in a depreciating way, though allowing 
 that the Janua is an immortal (!) school-book; and nearly 
 a hundred years afterward, Adelung, in his History of Human 
 Folly, describes him as a man of weak and limited mind, and 
 regards him as little more than a charlatan. Hallam passes 
 him by, with a brief reference only to the Janua and the 
 Orbis, characterizing him as a man of "some ingenuity but 
 little judgment." No doubt much of this neglect of the old 
 bishop was due to the fact that his ecclesiastical and pansophic 
 writings were of only passing interest, and that his chief claim 
 to permanent regard as an intellectual force lay in his contribu- 
 tions to the education of the young. Even in our own day a 
 man who writes on education is regarded as, to some extent, 
 a trifler, if not a fanatic, by historians and men of letters. The 
 mere fact that he occupies himself with the education of the 
 child-mind seems to stamp him as something of a child 
 himself in any case, as not worthy of notice, except by 
 schoolmasters : and they avoid him. If Milton, the contem- 
 porary of Comenius, had written nothing but his Tractate on 
 Education, he would have been long since forgotten, or, at 
 most, known only to a few antiquaries, notwithstanding the 
 literary excellence of portions of the famous essay. Roger 
 Ascham has seldom been assigned his fit place as a stylist and 
 a former of English prose; and this, because he wrote on 
 education. Even many men of letters, whose business is the 
 history of English literature, have not, I find, read his Schole- 
 master, save in extracts, and, in like manner, classical experts 
 know wonderfully little of Quintilian. Mulcaster's Positions 
 has met with a like fate. And yet it is beyond all question 
 that, had the subject on which these men wrote been the 
 political backstairs gossip of " Memoires pour servir," or 
 tracings on monumental stones, or even the ways of bees or
 
 140 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 beetles, their importance as mere men of letters and as 
 contributors to the enrichment of the substance, and refiners 
 of the form, of the English tongue, would have been kept 
 constantly in the eye of the literary public. 
 
 As a partial explanation of this neglect, it has to be noted 
 that to write anything, having the aspect of novelty, on 
 education and schools, is by implication to attack a large and 
 powerful class, and to insure their hostility. This doubtless 
 helps to consign the writers to forgetfulness. Even the 
 venerable Comenius, when his life-work was approaching its 
 close, was assailed at Amsterdam as an arch-enemy of schools 
 and schoolmasters, and had to make a pathetic defence. "I 
 can affirm," he says, " from the bottom of my heart, that these 
 forty years my aim has been simple and unpretending ; 
 indifferent whether I teach or be taught, admonish or be 
 admonished ; walling to act the part of a teacher of teachers, if 
 in anything it may be permitted to me to do so, and a disciple 
 of disciples where progress may be possible. They say that I 
 write against schools ; nay, it is for schools that I speak and 
 
 have spoken Why, then, should any delight to molest me? 
 
 Let me live in tranquillity as long as God wills me to be here." 
 
 To resent criticism of an institution, or a mode of adminis- 
 tration, as if it were a personal attack on its administrators, is 
 not confined to the teaching profession, but it certainly has 
 been a more active characteristic of schoolmasters than 
 of clergymen, lawyers, or physicians. Teachers, as a rule, 
 do not wish to be disturbed by new ideas. Even Milton, 
 though he shared with Comenius hatred of the traditionary 
 methods, yet, just because he was himself a schoolmaster, 
 suffers from this narrow pedagogic spirit, and declines, in his 
 letter to Hartlib, to have anything to do with new-fangled 
 notions. "To search what many modern Januas and 
 Didactics, more than ever I shall read, have projected, my 
 inclination leads me not." It is true that he also says, " What 
 I have benefited herein among old renowned authors I shall
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 14! 
 
 spare." Who the "renowned authors" may have been, how- 
 ever, he does not say ; nor does his treatise give any indication 
 that he ever read any of them, although we may, perhaps, not 
 err in presuming that Quintilian, at least, was not unknown to 
 him. Doubtless this peculiar attitude of the scholastic mind 
 is largely due to the position of authority in which teachers are 
 placed when yet young and unformed. They succeed to a 
 certain traditionary way of doing things ; a few years' practice 
 habituates them to it, and this habit combines with the almost 
 despotic position in which they are placed to produce a self- 
 conviction of finality. They repeat themselves from day to 
 day and call it experience. It is unreasonable, accordingly, to 
 blame teachers for their attitude to the science, history, and 
 criticism of their art. The causes are obvious : to understand 
 is to sympathise. And it is vain, I think, to expect this 
 attitude to be altered until all intending schoolmasters are 
 required, before they begin their work, to study the theory and 
 history of education. The academic study of their science and 
 art, such as is now found at many universities in America, 
 Germany, and elsewhere, will convey to the young aspirant the 
 best tradition, while stimulating to thought on his own account. 
 If he begins to think about the principles and aims of his 
 profession when still young, he will, in the great majority of 
 cases, continue to think when engrossed with the practical 
 work of the school. 
 
 Comenius did not flash on the world unheralded. Perhaps 
 no man ever stood forth as the representative of an intellectual 
 or moral movement by organizing its essential characteristics 
 in a coherent statement, without owing much to his prede- 
 cessors. Aristotle had his Plato, and Newton his Kepler, and 
 Bacon had many men working for the inductive gospel before 
 he formulated the Novum Organum. So with Comenius. 
 To begin with, the Reformation movement had stirred 
 questions which went far beyond the limits which it had 
 originally prescribed for itself, and in no department did it
 
 142 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 more directly assail old conceptions than in that of education. 
 It would be out of place here to show how this was a necessary 
 consequence of the Reformation principle, and it would only 
 irritate a reader to have the words of Luther and others 
 quoted for the hundredth time. The questions, however, of 
 whom to teach and what to teach, naturally first occupied the 
 field of vision, to the exclusion of the more fundamental 
 question, how to teach. Ascham and Sturm certainly wrote 
 on the "how," but their "how" was limited to the teaching of the 
 Latin language and literature. It is surprising to find how many 
 books treated of the work of schools before Comenius came on 
 the field. Comenius, accordingly, had many forerunners ; but 
 this does not justify us in exaggerating what he owed to them, 
 by way of detracting from his greatness and originality. No 
 one is more open and candid on the subject than is Comenius 
 himself. He names the books he had read, always in the 
 sincere hope of finding what he wanted. He had no desire to 
 originate. I doubt if there ever was a man who devoted 
 himself to labour for his fellow-men so ardently as Comenius 
 did, in the field of religion, intellectual progress, and education, 
 who was less of an egotist. He worked and wrote in the most 
 single-hearted spirit. Much, very much, of the work he did 
 for education was, in truth, done unwillingly and from a pure 
 sense of duty. His main intellectual interest was his pansophy, 
 the co-ordination of all knowledge with a view to the advance 
 of humanity and the conciliation of religious parties. All that 
 he conceived and did was conceived and done for the " glory 
 of God," and to advance Christian unity and a rational 
 Christian civilization on a Protestant basis. An irenicon was 
 the necessity of the times, and it was the dream of Comenius, 
 as it was of Vives, Casaubon, and Grotius. Thus, in many 
 essential respects he was the European popularizer of Bacon, 
 and he was perhaps also the first evangelical Broad Churchman 
 among Protestants. He was constantly, however, setting aside 
 his more ambitious schemes to do the educational work that
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 143 
 
 lay to his hand ; and this he called following the leadings of 
 Providence. 
 
 The three most important of the precursors of Comenius 
 were Ludovicus Vives the Spaniard, Bacon the Englishman, 
 and Ratke the Holsteiner. 
 
 Vives was born in 1492, at Valencia, exactly one hundred 
 years before Comenius ; Bacon was born in 1561 ; and Ratke 
 in 1571, twenty-one years before Comenius. Rabelais and 
 Montaigne seem to have been unknown to Comenius. Of 
 Vives, Comenius himself says that he knew better where the 
 fault in schools lay than the nature of the remedy ; and yet he, 
 like Bacon, owed more to Vives than he imagined if not in 
 the sphere of education, at least in his whole cast of thought, 
 including his pansophic ideal. For Vives was an encyclopae- 
 dist in his range of intellectual activity, an enemy of mere 
 authority, directing attention away from the barren dialectic of 
 the schools to the silent study of nature. Like Comenius, too, 
 he was one of those who were always hoping to find some 
 basis of ecclesiastical and civil unity which might conciliate 
 the distractions of the time. He is sometimes called a 
 Humanist, sometimes a Realist. The truth is, that after 
 giving promise of future distinction as a schoolman, he grew 
 out of the scholastic philosophy, and became, in relation to the 
 general current of thought, a Humanist, but without falling 
 into the idolatry of style which characterized the leaders of that 
 movement. In relation to education and the school, he was 
 a Realist only in so far as he included in his course of 
 education realistic subjects. In his book, De Tradendis 
 Disciplinis, he treats of the education of the child from 
 infancy, keeping in view always the moral aim of all instruction. 
 What he says is always characterized by good sense ; but to us 
 nowadays his rules and recommendations are commonplaces. 
 In his book on the education of women, for which he has been 
 extolled as a reformer, it is the morals, manners, and domestic 
 training of women, along with instruction in reading and
 
 144 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 writing, that he speaks of; beyond this, nothing. The 
 instruction of boys meant, with Vives, as with everybody in 
 those days, Latin chiefly ; and he gives eight or nine years to 
 the acquisition of this language 1 . Into the school curriculum, 
 however, he would introduce Greek, history, geography, and 
 nature-knowledge. But he does not seem to have had any 
 idea of a curriculum through which, with a view to mind- 
 culture generally, all boys should be carried. His remarks are 
 generally pertinent and sagacious, and it is believed that the 
 Jesuit teachers learned much from him ; but to the specific 
 subject of method, in our modern sense, he does not seem to 
 have made any contribution of value. There is, I suspect, 
 little in Vives that may not be found in Quintilian and Plutarch. 
 The severe discipline of the time, and the want of lightness 
 and variety in school-work, are condemned by him, but in this 
 and in other respects he only shares his opinion with many 
 writers. This slight sketch of the teaching of Vives will suffice 
 to show that Comenius may have owed to him suggestion and 
 stimulus, but nothing more. 
 
 The educational activity of men like Vives supports the 
 view set forth in the beginning of this book, viz. that it is 
 impossible clearly to apprehend the history of education from 
 the close of the Middle Ages down to this century, unless 
 we distinctly recognize two lines of thought which run side 
 by side in their beginning, but soon cross each other the 
 theological and the literary. The Renaissance had many 
 aspects ; in its purely educational aims it was an attempt to 
 rouse men from dogmatic slumber, and to bring them face 
 to face once more with nature and life as that was interpreted 
 
 1 The latter half of the i^th century was full of complaints as to the time 
 spent in learning Latin and full also of short ways, but no one then or for 150 
 years after doubted its absolute necessity. John Sturm states the case thus : 
 " Romanus sermo per omnes nationes et populos et regna commeat. 
 Neque usquam gentium venias ubi non Latinum hospitem invenias qui 
 viam proficiscenti monstret. Adeo linguam hanc hospitalem esse voluit 
 Deus quam late terrarum orbis patet, hominibus."
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 145 
 
 in the great literatures of Greece and Rome. The Reformation 
 of religion was only a part of the movement, and, till Luther's 
 time, a subordinate part. When the Lutheran movement, 
 however, fairly took hold of men's minds, literature and pure 
 Humanism found a potent rival in theology and the new ideal 
 of justification, saving grace, and personal piety. " By faith 
 are ye saved " not by literature. Unquestionably, the more 
 enlightened reformers, and notably Luther and Melanchthon, 
 accepted literature and a genial view of human life. But the 
 literary and artistic interest was not dominant with them, as 
 with Erasmus. Faith, justification in the sight of God, and 
 morality as fruit of faith, constituted the chief end of man, and 
 consequently of the education of the young. But the reformed 
 faith did not, as yet, wholly break with Humanism, as Chris- 
 tianity had done before the fifth century. 
 
 After Luther and Sturm and Ascham, however, the 
 paramount interest began to obscure the less important. The 
 career of Casaubon illustrates this. Though much had been 
 done to improve the curriculum of schools, the literary 
 enthusiasm had exhausted itself, and there was unquestionably 
 a relapse into the old formalism. The Catholic reaction, also, 
 called many minds away to the main issue of modern civiliza- 
 tion personality versus organized spiritual despotism. Then 
 came on the scene a new educational force the potent ideas 
 of Realism as represented by Bacon. Nature was to be 
 studied at first hand, and studied by silent and faithful 
 observation. This study had more than a mere theoretical 
 interest. The observation of nature and of its teachings was 
 to accomplish great things for the improvement of the social 
 and industrial conditions of human life. In a letter addressed 
 by Bacon to Casaubon, these words are used : " The contem- 
 plations I have in view are those which may bring about the 
 better ordering of man's life, with all its turmoil 1 ." Nature, in 
 
 1 Footnote in Pattison's Life of Casaubon, p. 335. The letter was 
 never sent. 
 
 L. 10
 
 146 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 short, was to be used as a gift of God to man. There was 
 nothing in this nearly so dangerous to the Protestant theo- 
 logical conception of life as pure Humanism was, which in 
 some of its manifestations had little to distinguish it from a 
 cultured paganism ; and this the Christian Church had always 
 feared as its chief enemy, until in the middle of the sixteenth 
 century the Jesuits suborned it. There was nothing, in truth, 
 to prevent the whole-hearted union of Realism and a liberal 
 reformed theology; but in their relations to Realism the Jesuits, 
 who had already captured Humanism and subordinated it to 
 the Church, had to reconsider their ways ; and are still recon- 
 sidering them. Science and the scientific spirit gave them 
 their death-blow, though it is true they are long of dying. 
 
 Now, Ratke and Comenius were the apostolic missionaries 
 of the specific Baconian realistic movement in the field of 
 education. They adopted the saying that " there was nothing 
 in the understanding which had not first been in sense " ; but 
 neither they nor any of their contemporaries saw the far- 
 reaching and fatal philosophical and theological effects of such 
 a doctrine. The maxim was used only to establish the 
 necessity of founding all instruction on sense, and on all the 
 senses, and the importance of cultivating the powers of 
 observation. " Live we not in the garden of Nature, as well 
 
 as those who have gone before us? Why, then, learn the 
 
 works of Nature otherwise than through our senses ? Why not 
 substitute for dead books the living book of Nature ? " The 
 philosophical consequences, I say, of the celebrated dictum as 
 to intellect and sense could not occur to such men as 
 Comenius ; for, in his crude psychology, there was, quite apart 
 from the mere understanding, the "soul," and the spiritual 
 life of the soul in God. 
 
 Bacon's interest lay in the sphere of the higher education. 
 He was a pansophist, and his ambition was to see a visible 
 organization of science, in the form of a great State-supported 
 academy of investigation and teaching. In this respect
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 147 
 
 Comenius directly affiliates himself to Bacon. All that 
 Comenius did in this department of his activity derives itself 
 from the Englishman. The Advancement of Learning and 
 the New Atlantis were the teachers of Comenius. The 
 same magnificent conception lay at the foundation of the 
 " Institut National," projected by the French revolutionaries 
 in 1795. "Finally, we propose to you to create a National 
 Institute," they said to the Government, " able in its several 
 parts to give every branch of public instruction and collectively 
 human knowledge carried to its highest point : everything 
 which men know must be taught there to its highest perfection : 
 every man must be able to learn there how to do what any 
 man of any country, aglow with the fire of genius, has done, 
 and is able still to do. This establishment must honour, not 
 France only, but the whole human race, astonishing it by the 
 spectacle of its power and the development of its strength 1 ." 
 The names of the first members of the Institute were those of 
 men capable of doing the work expected of them Lagrange, 
 Laplace, Legendre, Cuvier, Volney, Sainte Pierre, Lakanal, 
 Chenier, Lebrun, and Fontanes. It is a curious fact that the 
 Long Parliament (also a revolutionary Parliament) contem- 
 plated, in 1641, handing over Chelsea College to carry out the 
 pansophic views of Comenius, thus anticipating the action of 
 the French Republic by one hundred and fifty years. The 
 Baconian, Comenian, and revolutionary ideas have now been, 
 in some places, almost realized ; and, in so far as they are not 
 realized, they still enter into the dreams of university reformers. 
 It is of importance to insist on this, because it has been 
 customary to look on the fervent old bishop as a visionary, 
 whereas he was the most practical of men only living a few 
 centuries too soon. 
 
 The advocacy of pansophy and realism did not exhaust the 
 powers of Comenius. He was an ardent worker, as I have 
 
 1 Quoted from a paper by Mr. Jamson Smith, Birmingham. 
 
 IO 2
 
 148 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 indicated above, in the cause of a Protestant union, based on 
 the vital and essential interests of Christianity. His Union 
 Necessarium had this for its aim. The fanatical divisions of 
 Protestantism had been the Jesuits' opportunity. Being an 
 unorganized mass, they had been swept back by the serried 
 ranks of Loyola. Protestantism was in a critical position. 
 
 It has been sometimes said that Comenius owed much to 
 Valentine Andrea, his senior by four years. This remarkable 
 man, born at Herrenburg in 1586, was distinguished for his 
 learning, energy, and originality, and stood eminent among his 
 contemporaries. Of him Herder said that he " blossomed as a 
 rose among thorns." He was a man of poetic and ideal 
 character, and yet, like Comenius, in the highest degree 
 practical. Like other educational reformers, he attacked the 
 mechanical character of grammar-school instruction, and the 
 equally mechanical character of the people's schools, and of 
 the instruction of children in the Catechism. He desiderated 
 a better method in both the primary and secondary schools, 
 and the substitution of an evangelical spirit for the heathenism 
 and arid curriculum of the latter. His disgust of the narrow 
 range of school instruction made him lean to realistic studies 
 and hail with enthusiasm Comenius's Didactica. Realist as 
 he was, however, education by means of language, and 
 education by means of things, was subordinated to the religious 
 aim " omnis spiritus cedat Christo." His educational ideas 
 are contained in his Reipublicae Christianopolitanae De- 
 scriptio, 1619. A book published in his youth, called Idea 
 Bonae Institutionis, is lost. The dates of these books show 
 that he had anticipated Comenius as an educational writer; 
 but there is no evidence that Comenius owed anything to him 
 which he did not himself already ascribe to the general 
 influence of Vives. Impulse, sympathy, and encouragement he 
 found, doubtless, in Andrea's strongly expressed views, as he 
 did in the personal recognition and encouragement which Andrea 
 himself generously extended to him by letter ; but this was all.
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 149 
 
 Within a few years after the publication of the Advance- 
 ment of Learning (1605), we find Ratke, the Holsteiner, 
 formulating the new ideas in the interest of education and 
 attracting the attention of the princes and universities of 
 Northern Europe. Although it is true that Ratke failed to 
 answer Comenius's letter of inquiry, there can be no doubt that 
 Ratke anticipated him in all his general principles of method. 
 To him, and not to Vives or Andrea, Comenius was directly 
 indebted. There was, perhaps, more of the light of originality 
 in Ratke than in Comenius. 
 
 To Bateus, the Irish Jesuit, who died at Madrid in 1614, 
 Comenius was, in an indirect way, also indebted, in so far 
 as the Jesuit's Janua showed the possibility of bringing 
 together a vast number of vocables in a school-book, and also 
 in so far as it showed him what to avoid. He called it a 
 " Noah's Ark for Words." To Professor Lubinus of Rostock, 
 again, who died in 1621, Comenius certainly owed the first idea 
 of the Orbis Pictus. 
 
 I think I have now exhausted the external sources of 
 Comenius's inspiration, and the result is this : In respect of his 
 philosophy, and of the materials which should enter into the 
 education of man, Comenius was a disciple of Bacon, of whom 
 he speaks as "the noble Verulam, who has given us the true 
 key of nature " ; in respect of the fundamental conception of 
 method as determined by the inductive process of mind, and 
 many of the rules of method, he was indebted directly to Ratke 
 and only indirectly to Bacon ; and to Lubinus he owed the 
 suggestion of the Orbis Pictus. But in the wide reach of 
 his educational conceptions, in the development of the whole 
 subject of method, and in his mode of procedure in dis- 
 covering it, and expounding it, Comenius was wholly original. 
 
 Let us now briefly consider the leading characteristics of 
 Comenius as an educationalist, bearing in mind, the while, that 
 the education of his age consisted of reading, writing, the
 
 ISO COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 Catechism badly taught, and Latin nothing but Latin, with 
 here and there, but chiefly in the universities, Greek and 
 scholastic logic even reading and writing being for the few, 
 and further education only for the select among those 
 few. 
 
 1. Comenius held that every human being should be 
 educated, simply because he was a human being. This is 
 nothing new to us, but it was an immense step in advance of 
 previous thinkers. Luther and his friends desired to educate 
 the young because they had souls to be saved; Comenius, 
 simply because they were human beings. 
 
 2. In perfect consistency with this fundamental view, 
 Comenius advocated pansophy in the school, for only by an 
 encyclopaedic training could we build up the whole fabric of 
 the human mind. We must begin by instructing in the 
 elements of all things, for our final aim has need of them 
 all, that aim being threefold : First, knowledge universal, 
 including knowledge of oneself ; second, virtue ; and third, 
 religion. There is involved in the first portion of the threefold 
 end a thoroughgoing encyclopaedism. The work to be done 
 in the school has for its ultimate aim pansophy, and is entirely 
 governed and suggested by the pansophic ideal of man and 
 society. Universal knowledge is to be organized, and all must 
 share in it. 
 
 3. Knowledge must be expressed in the vernacular of 
 each nation, for it is a human possession, and not the 
 possession of any one individual or class. This also was 
 logically involved in his fundamental conception. " We desire 
 and protest," he says in the Prodromus, " that studies of 
 wisdom be no longer committed to Latin alone, and kept shut 
 up in the schools, as has hitherto been done, to the greatest 
 contempt and injury of the people at large and of the popular 
 tongues. Let all things be delivered to each nation in its own 
 speech." This was clearly a necessary deduction from his 
 principle that every human being had, as such, a right to
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 151 
 
 education. All knowledge existed for the bettering of man's 
 condition and elevating him as a rational being. Nature is 
 God's work, and is an enemy of man only in so far as he does 
 not know it. He must, then, be taught to know nature and to 
 know himself. Why ? That he may rule nature; and also rule 
 himself, which is virtue. The more comprehensive the know- 
 ledge, the wiser is the ordinary life of man, and the more assured, 
 consequently, is his virtue. Nay, religion, as well as virtue, 
 rests on a knowledge of nature. Man's nature and external 
 nature presented themselves to the mind of Comenius as a 
 fundamental harmony. In this harmony was visible the good- 
 ness of God : man's business was to find it and then to refer all 
 things to God, and lead a life in nature and society as with 
 Him. So Milton held that we could not arrive at a "knowledge 
 of God and things invisible, save by conning over the visible 
 inferior creature " ; and Picus of Mirandola identified the law 
 of nature with the utterance of " our Lord Himself." 
 
 4. If encyclopaedic knowledge is to be acquired, even in 
 its elements, we must take care that every one begins early, i.e. 
 in the infant school. Comenius was the originator of the idea 
 of the infant school -the " school of the mother's lap," as he 
 calls it; and there is little in Pestalozzi and Frobel which is not 
 in Comenius, though not in him fully developed. Very simple 
 instruction is to be given, only such as infant minds can 
 assimilate ; but, however simple it may be, it must be wide- 
 reaching as nature itself. It must be a foundation broad enough 
 to sustain, in the long run, the weight of the pansophic temple. 
 
 5. How this broad foundation was to be laid, and a 
 building erected on it, was the question of questions, for it was 
 the question of method, and is the problem solved in the 
 Great Didactic Comenius's central work. Ratke's leading 
 positions were that all procedure in education was to be from 
 particulars to generals, and all, consequently, by observation 
 and experiment. The Baconian philosophy showed that thus . 
 we acquired knowledge, and accordingly thus must we impart
 
 152 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 knowledge. For with Ratke, as with Comenius, it was always 
 giving and imparting, but now no longer a mere storing of 
 memory, but all according to a method such that the teaching of 
 one thing should be the teaching to reason on all things. 
 Comenius seized on the same conception, and wrote, as I have 
 said above, to Ratke for fuller information ; but his letter 
 remained unanswered, and he had to think out the problem for 
 himself. And just at that critical point, his philosophy of the 
 world and of man's life, and the harmonious relation of the 
 two, came to his aid. The world was not a mechanical 
 construction, but dynamical. It was the wisdom of God 
 making itself manifest ; and, as regarded man, God's purpose 
 was to bring him back to himself through nature and life. Let 
 nature and man, then, be conceived as order and law, with a 
 purpose. But if this were so, there must be some way of 
 building up knowledge, virtue, and religion in the mind of 
 man, so as to make him what he is intended to be an image 
 of his Creator. There must be order and law here as well as 
 elsewhere. The larger cosmical conception suggested the way, 
 for what was true of the whole must be true of the parts. Each 
 individual thing, no less than the cosmic whole, was dynamical; 
 each thing was an organism growing from seed to flower and 
 fruit. In fact, the biological process was the mind-process. 
 In his Prodromus, p. 40, he says, " After many workings 
 and tossings of my thought, by reducing everything to the 
 immovable laws of nature, I lighted upon my Didactica 
 Afagna, which shows the art of easily and solidly teaching all 
 men all things." 
 
 6. Having already determined the end of education and 
 the materials to be used, it was now clear to Comenius that the 
 building up of the mind by means of these materials must be 
 an organic process. In nature, then, he must find the clue to 
 the method of education in the chick, and in the seed of the 
 
 1 Except in so far as he may have read some of Ratke's writings.
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 153 
 
 plant, and in their gradual development. The mode of 
 procedure in finding principles and rules was analogical, or, as 
 he calls it, syncretic. The science of nature was then in its 
 infancy, and Comenius could work only on such knowledge as 
 he had sometimes mistaken, always inadequate. His firm 
 conviction, however, in the harmony of things sustained him. 
 The result was that many of his illustrations were fanciful, and 
 some of his rules of method strained. Yet in the main he was 
 right. In spite of many defects, we have from him the only 
 thoroughgoing treatise on educational method that has yet 
 appeared in the history of the world. 
 
 7. Comenius reformed language-teaching, and began a 
 new era in text-books. He had been met at once by a great 
 difficulty in the practical working out of his theory. The 
 curriculum of the schools was substantially Latin, and in Latin. 
 His theory of the building up of the human mind demanded 
 realia. Hence he advocated teaching of and in the vernacular : 
 the vernacular first, and then Latin. When Latin had to be 
 faced, his principles led to the Janua and the Orbis 
 Pictus, which latter is an illustrated real-encyclopaedia for the 
 young. All the words necessary for Latin intercourse must be 
 acquired as soon and as easily as possible. But things had 
 also to be taught, of which words are but the symbols. Words, 
 then, must be taught with and through things. Language and 
 reality must go hand in hand. The building up of a knowledge 
 of things was the true building up of minds. Words being but 
 the symbols of things were best acquired along with the things 
 of which- they are the symbols. Thus we kill two birds with 
 one stone. Then, the true process of mind was the inductive. 
 Accordingly, the universal was to be reached through the 
 particular. Hence the multitude of facts in his school-books, 
 which were to be the basis of future generalization and 
 reasoning. As with things, so with language ; the elaborate 
 abstractions of Latin grammar are obstructive. Reading and 
 grammar must go together, and grammar itself must be
 
 154 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 simplified, and dictionaries too. Hence his graded grammars 
 and dictionaries, that the time spent over Latin might be 
 shorter, and progress more pleasant for the pupil. "If so 
 much time is to be spent on language alone," he says, " when 
 is the boy to know about things? when will he learn philosophy, 
 when religion, and so forth ? He will continue his life in pre- 
 paring for life." Again, all was to be graduated, and adapted 
 to the boy's age. 
 
 8. As to school discipline, Comenius was far ahead of his 
 own time, and even of ours. The seeds of knowledge, of 
 virtue, and of piety were, to begin with, already in the child. 
 Only wise culture was needed to make them spring into life 
 and grow to maturity, just as with plants. Coercion was thus 
 entirely out of place ; method superseded it, although he 
 admitted that corporal chastisement was sometimes necessary 
 for moral offences. 
 
 Onmia sponte fluant : absit violentia rebus. 
 
 9. As to the education of girls, Comenius was not only 
 more thoroughgoing than Vives and Erasmus, but two hundred 
 and fifty years in advance of other men. I take Professor 
 Masson's translation of Comenius's utterance on this subject 1 : 
 
 V " Nor, to say something particularly on this subject, can 
 any sufficient reason be given why the weaker sex should be 
 wholly shut out from liberal studies, whether in the native 
 tongue or in Latin. For equally are they God's image ; 
 equally are they partakers of grace, and of the kingdom to 
 come ; equally are they furnished with minds agile and capable 
 of wisdom, yea, often beyond our sex ; equally to them is there 
 a possibility of attaining high distinction, inasmuch as they 
 have often been employed by God Himself for the government 
 of peoples, the bestowing of wholesome counsels on kings and 
 princes, the science of medicine, and other things useful to the 
 human race, nay, even the prophetical office, and the rattling 
 
 1 Life of Milton.
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 155 
 
 reprimand of priests and bishops. Why, then, should we 
 admit them to the alphabet, but afterwards debar them from 
 books ? Do we fear their rashness ? The more we occupy 
 their thoughts, the less room will there be in them for 
 waywardness, which springs generally from vacuity of mind." ^ 
 
 Now it is an easy matter to pick holes in Comenius, 
 whether we regard him as a mystic theologian, a pansophic 
 philosopher, an enthusiastic humanitarian, or an educational 
 reformer. I leave this task to those who care to do it. 
 Assuredly no schoolboy in Europe or America, who under- 
 stands the nature of the old bishop's work, would do it, even if 
 he had the intellectual power ; and this, perhaps, is the highest 
 tribute to the services which Comenius rendered. I confine 
 myself to pointing out the defects which lapse of time and the 
 accumulation of experience have taught us to be defects ; for it 
 is the logic of events that teaches us the wisdom we call 
 our own. 
 
 The Baconian dictum, " Knowledge is power," is false, or, 
 at least, fallacious. Power lies in ideas and ideals, and a 
 vigorous intelligence behind them. This, Comenius, and with 
 him modern sensationalists, did not see. The mind is not 
 built up by universal knowledge, but by its own native energy 
 and activity in using a little well. Discipline of mind is of 
 more importance than the stocking of mind with multifarious 
 knowledges. "Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers." We 
 can now scarcely understand that men should seriously main- 
 tain that we could form men by knowledge ; but it was an 
 earnest conviction. " The mind is the man and the knowledge 
 of the mind. A man is but what he knoweth," says Bacon. 
 This being so, the conception of the school as an officina 
 humanitatis is a logical enough consequence. 
 
 Further, the pansophic basis in elementary education is to 
 be advocated only in a restricted sense. Children begin with 
 close and narrow interests and widen as they grow older.
 
 156 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 Literature, which, as artistic expression, includes art, is the 
 most potent of all instruments in the hands of the educator, 
 whether we have regard to intellectual growth, or to the moral 
 and religious life. Comenius, however, had not the remotest 
 conception of the aesthetic and literary, and in this respect 
 is like Locke. His own Latin prose is hard and poor and 
 negligent. So far, he is certainly an anti-humanist. But he is 
 not an anti-humanist in his conception of the ends of education 
 as moral and religious ends, but only in the narrower meaning 
 of Humanism that characterized the first period of the 
 Renaissance, when art and literary form were all in all. He 
 grew up in the latter half of the second humanistic period, when 
 textual criticism and erudition prevailed, and when men's 
 minds were too much agitated by the success of the Catholic 
 reaction to find time to pick phrases and polish lines. The 
 second epoch, even that of Scaliger, Casaubon, and Buchanan 
 was already passing away. 
 
 Further, his Janua as a book for learning Latin, is, it 
 must be confessed, a failure. 
 
 Finally, Comenius had no psychology to speak of, and thus 
 he was compelled to rely on the frail support of analogy for the 
 grounding of his principles. 
 
 Neither in his philosophy nor his erudition was Comenius 
 profound. Joseph Scaliger and Casaubon, of the immediately 
 preceding generation, would have had none of him : Spinoza, 
 writing his Ethica round the street-corner while Comenius 
 was carrying his cumbrous works through the press, would 
 have smiled at his too energetic faith. The theologians, so 
 much in evidence in the beginning of the seventeenth century, 
 would have deplored his vagueness and want of dogmatic 
 system. But, in truth, he was a better theologian than any of 
 them Swiss Calvinist, Roman Jesuit, or Dutch Arminian; 
 while his moral enthusiasm and educational insight almost 
 raised him to the rank of genius. The present and the future 
 so engrossed him that he had no time to overweight his mind
 
 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 157 
 
 by accumulating the written records of the past. He lived at 
 a time when men of intellect were divided into two classes, 
 those who looked back and those who looked forward ; he was 
 essentially a modern, and at once put his hand to the work 
 that was most urgent in the interests of Europe, viz. an 
 irenicon, scientific organization, and education. 
 
 And yet, whatever his shortcomings, Comenius remains for 
 us the most earnest and simple-hearted worker for the educa- 
 tion of the people, and the most penetrating writer on method 
 whom the world has ever seen in fact, the founder of method. 
 The more we study the subject of education in connexion 
 with the various influences at work in the beginning of the 
 seventeenth century, whether we take its large national, or 
 narrower scholastic, aspects, the more clearly do we see that 
 the simple-minded, much-enduring, and self-denying Moravian 
 bishop, so long forgotten, stands out as a prominent figure 
 even in general European history, and as quite the most 
 eminent in the history of European education. He is still 
 a living influence, and a power that will remain. When we 
 read the record of his days, we are amazed at the persistency 
 of his self-imposed labours in the midst of uncertain fortunes : 
 of him it may be truly said that he " linked month with month 
 in long-drawn chain of knitted purport." 
 
 " I thank God," he said, after a toilsome and disappointing 
 pilgrimage of fourscore years, " that I have been a man of 
 aspirations." But it is not as a man of aspirations alone that 
 we honour him to-day, but as a man who laboured for us as 
 few men have laboured ; who, in all the chances and changes 
 of his troubled life, was a unique and touching example of the 
 Christian graces of faith, hope, and love, and who has 
 bequeathed to us, as the solid fruit of his aspirations, the 
 Great Didactic a possession which the educational world, 
 at least, " will not willingly let die." 
 
 NOTE. There can be no doubt that Mulcaster (died 1611?) 
 anticipated much of both Ratke and Comenius, but there is no
 
 158 COMENIUS, THE SENSE-ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 evidence that he was known to them. Mr Quick says in his 
 Educational Biographies, " The latest advances in pedagogy have 
 established : (i) That the end and aim of education is to develop 
 the faculties of mind and body. (2) That all teaching processes 
 should be carefully adapted to the mental constitution of the learner. 
 (3) That the first stage of learning is of universal importance, and 
 requires a very high degree of skill in the teacher. (4) That the 
 brain of children, especially clever children, should not be subjected 
 to pressure. (5) That childhood should not be spent in learning 
 foreign languages, but that its language should be the mother- 
 tongue, and its exercises should include handiwork, especially 
 drawing. (6) That girls' education should be cared for no less than 
 boys'. (7) That the only hope of improving our schools lies in the 
 training of teachers." These were all advocated by Mulcaster.
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 JOHN MILTON 1 , THE CLASSICAL 
 ENCYCLOPAEDIST. 
 
 (d. 1674.) 
 
 WHEN we reflect that Milton was not only a Great Poet one 
 of the greatest but also the most learned and accomplished 
 man of his time, we naturally approach his Tractate with 
 profound respect and in the anticipation of much instruction. 
 Our expectations, it must be confessed, are at first disappointed. 
 For we are entitled to expect not only philosophic grasp but 
 also practical guidance from a man of genius who happened to 
 be also himself a teacher and for a long time kept a boys' 
 school in Aldersgate Street. On a closer acquaintance with 
 the book, however, we find much more in it than is obvious in 
 a first reading. 
 
 Rabelais and Montaigne had first moved in the direction 
 of the realistic in education, but by the real, Montaigne meant 
 studying what was said by eminent writers as opposed to mere 
 words and grammatical rules. He held that the languages 
 might be taught as they were taught to himself, conversationally, 
 and that the true end of education was not learning, in the 
 linguistic, or any other sense; but Wisdom. Rabelais advocated, 
 
 1 Born 1608: died 1674. Tractate on Education, published in 1644, 
 and a second edition 1673 at the end of the second edition of the minor 
 poems.
 
 160 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 in addition to this, realistic instruction in its usual sense. 
 Milton also, nearly 100 years after, wrote in the same sense, 
 but he was largely influenced by the educational movements 
 which had preceded him under Ratke and which were even 
 then represented by Comenius. He directly refers indeed to 
 Comenius's works in a somewhat sneering way in the begin- 
 ning of his Tractate. . " To tell you," he says, " what I have 
 benefited herein among old renowned authors, I shall spare ; 
 and to search what many modern Januas and Didactics, more 
 than ever I shall read, have projected, my inclination leads me 
 not." The reference is manifestly to Comenius's Janua Lin- 
 guarum Reserata and to the Magna Didactica, in which 
 Comenius lays down his principles ; or it may be to the 
 Didactics of Ratke. But no man, not even a Milton, however 
 he may ignore the originators of ideas, can keep himself 
 outside the influence of the ideas themselves, if they are in 
 the air. 
 
 Let us first of all bear in mind that Milton's Treatise is 
 only a very condensed and brief statement, written at the 
 request of his friend Hartlib, the devoted follower of Comenius, 
 and that it reads more like a summary of opinions to be after- 
 wards elaborated than a complete treatise. It is because of 
 the almost negligent structure of the Essay and the condensed 
 and pregnant character of the style "a few observations which 
 have flower'd off and are as it were the burnishing of many 
 studious and contemplative years" that it demands close 
 attention if it is to be thoroughly appreciated. 
 
 Milton was to a certain modified extent a Realist and 
 Encyclopaedist like Comenius, but in essential respects different. 
 For he was a realist who sought the study of reality, in so far 
 as realism entered into his system, in the ancients, whereas 
 Comenius sought for the study of reality as modern science 
 presented it, including the ancients or abridgments of their 
 works, only in so far as they were necessary and accessory. 
 In another essential respect Milton differed from Comenius.
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST l6l 
 
 He had not in view the education of the people as a whole. 
 He thought only of the few "our nobler and our gentle 
 youth " those who had time for prolonged study. 
 
 Both writers, however, were alike in disregarding mere 
 words language and literary expression as in themselves 
 containing the elements of knowledge and discipline during the 
 juvenile or primary period of education. 
 
 Oratory, poetry, all art in language, were certainly recog- 
 nized by both (as they are by all realists whom it is worth our 
 while to consider), but only as the ornament and finish of 
 education and as belonging to the period of adolescence. 
 The peculiar discipline of mind given by the comparison of a 
 modern with an ancient tongue is not even alluded to by either 
 Milton or Comenius. This was largely due to the prevalent 
 method or no-method of teaching which justified Milton in 
 calling the studies of schools and universities " an asinine feast 
 of sow-thistles and brambles," and again, " meer words or such 
 things chiefly as were better unlearnt." 
 
 THE END OF EDUCATION. 
 
 Milton's first proposition is thus laid down : 
 " The end then of Learning is to repair the ruines of our 
 first Parents by regaining to know God aright, and out of that 
 knowledge to love him, to imitate him, to be like him, as we 
 may the meerest by possessing our souls of true virtue, which 
 being united to the heavenly grace of faith makes up the 
 highest perfection. But because our understanding cannot in 
 this body found it self but on sensible things, nor arrive so 
 clearly to the knowledge of God and things invisible, as by 
 orderly conning over the visible and inferior creature, the same 
 method is necessarily to be follow'd in all discreet teaching. 
 And seeing every Nation affords not experience and tradition 
 enough for all kind of Learning, therefore we are chiefly 
 taught the Languages of those people who have at any time 
 L. n
 
 162 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 been most industrious after Wisdom ; so that Language is but 
 the Instrument conveying to us things usefull to be known. 
 And though a Linguist should pride himself to have all the 
 Tongues that Babel cleft the world into, yet, if he have not 
 studied the solid things in them as well as the Words & 
 Lexicons, he were nothing so much to be esteem'd a learned 
 man, as any Yeoman or Tradesman competently wise in his 
 Mother Dialect only." 
 
 Now in this passage we have several propositions which it 
 is worth our while to disentangle that we may clearly com- 
 prehend Milton's view of the End of Education. 
 
 1. The aim of Education is the knowledge of God and 
 likeness to God. 
 
 2. Likeness to God we attain by possessing our souls of 
 true Virtue and by the Heavenly Grace of Faith. 
 
 3. Knowledge of God we attain by the study of the visible 
 things of God. 
 
 4. Teaching, then, has for its aim this knowledge. 
 
 5. Language is merely an instrument or vehicle for the 
 knowledge of things. 
 
 6. The knowledge of all the languages in the world, with- 
 out a knowledge of the solid things regarding which they treat, 
 leaves a man less "learned" than any farmer or tradesman who 
 knows only his own vernacular, but, in and through that, has a 
 competent knowledge of things. 
 
 Milton also tells us in another part of his Essay that he 
 considers that to be "a compleat and generous education 
 which fits a man to perform justly, skilfully and magnanimously 
 all the offices, both private and public, of Peace and War." 
 With this large and noble aim all will heartily concur. But we 
 cannot pass without remark the assumption contained in the 
 larger statement of the aim of education. We do not admit 
 that the knowledge of language is not a knowledge of things. 
 We would, on the contrary, maintain that language, apart from 
 the general argumentum of a writer, is a thing a thing intel-
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 163 
 
 lectual and a thing moral. And further in these days, when 
 language extends itself into the science of comparative 
 philology, it is also a thing scientific. 
 
 I shall not dwell on this however, because I wish rather to 
 expound Milton's views than to criticize them. It is enough 
 that I emphasize the above aspect of Milton's doctrine, as it is 
 with him fundamental and explains much that follows. 
 
 Too much time, he says, is spent in acquiring a knowledge 
 of Greek and Latin. We spend seven or eight years in 
 acquiring what might be acquired in one especially if we 
 would stop the absurd practice of the " forcing the empty wits 
 of children to write Theams, Verses and Orations, which are the 
 acts of ripest judgment and the final work of a head fill'd by 
 long reading and observing." Another objection to the 
 practice is that the boys are under the necessity of "using such 
 language as they have, thus barbarizing against the Latin and 
 Greek Idiom with their untutored Anglicisms odious to be 
 read." 
 
 We may now pass from the general aim of education to the 
 detail of Milton's scheme, merely premising that he had in view 
 boys from 12 to 2 1 years of age, that is to say, the secondary 
 and university periods of instruction. 
 
 THE MATERIALS AND ORDER OF EDUCATION. 
 Secondary School Stage. 
 
 Milton's opinion is that after the boys have acquired the 
 accidence and the " chief and necessary rules " they should 
 have " some chosen short book lessoned thoroughly to them," 
 with a view to praxis of the accidence and syntax. Arithmetic 
 and Geometry are to be learned at " some other hour of the 
 day, even playing as the old manner was." 
 
 The pupils, now we may presume thirteen years old, were 
 next immediately to proceed to the study of things in Latin and 
 
 II 2
 
 164 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 Greek authors, and they would thus " bring the whole language 
 quickly into their power." This he considered to be " the 
 most rational and most profitable way of learning languages 
 and whereby we may best hope to give account to God of our 
 youth spent herein." 
 
 The things to be studied first and for long are sensible 
 things and not abstractions. We learn from Phillips, who was 
 a pupil of Milton's at Aldersgate Street, the names of the books 
 which Milton made use of in teaching with a view to give 
 instruction at once in language through things, and things 
 through language : 
 
 The work of Cato Major, De Re Rustica the only work of 
 Gate's which has come down to us. 
 
 Columella's 12 books on the same subject. 
 
 Varro [of course De Re Rustica]. 
 
 PalladiuSy also an agricultural writer very popular in the 
 Middle Ages. His treatise is in 14 books, mostly in the form 
 of a farmer's calendar. 
 
 Celsus on Medicine. 
 
 Pliny's Natural History. 
 
 Vitruvius on Architecture. 
 
 Frontinus on Strategy. (4 books.) 
 
 Lucretius 's philosophical poem De Rerum Natura. 
 
 Manilius, a writer of a poem on Astrology and Astronomy. 
 (Astronomica, 5 books.) 
 
 In Greek : 
 
 Aratus, who wrote two astronomical poems very popular 
 among the ancients. 
 
 Dionysius, commonly called Periegetes, who wrote a 
 description of the earth in hexameters. 
 
 Oppian, who wrote on fishing and hunting. 
 
 Apollonius Rhodius, whose Argonautica gives a description 
 of the adventures of the Argonauts.
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 165 
 
 Quintus Calaber, author of a Greek epic poem on the 
 Trojan war. 
 
 Plutarch (apparently some of the Moral writings ?). 
 
 Geminus, who wrote on Astronomy. 
 
 Aelian on Tactics. 
 
 Xenophorfs Anabasis and Cyropaedia. 
 
 The substantial correctness of the record made by Phillips 
 is guaranteed by the list of books which Milton himself re- 
 commends in his treatise, though he omits some of the above 
 books, and adds others. Among those named by Milton and 
 omitted by Phillips are the rural parts of Virgil, Hesiod, Theo- 
 critus : also Seneca's Quaestiones Naturales. Milton also 
 names for ethical, philosophical, and political teaching, the 
 moral works of Plato, Xenophon, Aristotle, Cicero and the 
 Greek poets. 
 
 Now, if we attempt to arrange the course of study, following 
 such slight indications as are given by Milton, we find that 
 after the initiatory year's work already adverted to (substantially 
 grammatical), the books first to be studied are the writers on 
 agriculture, Cato, Columella, and Varro. These will give the 
 pupils command of all ordinary prose. After reading these 
 books they should study in some modern author " the use of 
 the globes and all the maps." Concurrently with this, Greek 
 would be begun after the same fashion as Latin, and the pupil 
 be introduced to Aristotle's physical works and the history of 
 plants by Theophrastus. To help in these studies in so far as 
 they were of a practical kind, all sorts of mechanical teachers 
 might be employed such as hunters, fowlers, fishermen, archi- 
 tects, engineers, etc. in a subordinate capacity, either giving 
 their services gratuitously or for a salary. This course of study 
 would bring the pupil to the age of about 17! should say. 
 
 The pupils would now proceed to Latin and Greek authors 
 on Astronomy and Geometry, and proceed to the study of 
 Trigonometry, Engineering, Fortification, Navigation. A com- 
 pendium of Physics would be here introduced, and Natural
 
 l66 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 History, and even Anatomy and Medicine (within certain limits) 
 studied. Milton's scheme of secondary education (in so far as 
 it has reference to the intellect) is thus at once realistic, encyclo- 
 paedic and technical. 
 
 University Stage. 
 
 The above studies could not possibly be completed until 
 the pupils were at least 18 years of age the university age, as 
 we may call it. It is at this age that the purely literary, 
 political, theological, and philosophical course would, according 
 to Milton's scheme, begin. The literary, by the reading of the 
 moral parts of Plato, Cicero, Xenophon, some Greek, Latin or 
 Italian comedies, and those tragedies which "treat of house- 
 hold matters, as the Trachiniae, Alcestis and the like." Then 
 would come the study of Politics, " that they might know the 
 beginning, end and reasons of Political Societies ; that they 
 may not in a dangerous fit of the Commonwealth be such poor, 
 shaken, uncertain Reeds, of such a tottering Conscience as 
 many of our great Counsellors have lately shown themselves, 
 but stedfast pillars of the State." Next they would study Law 
 in its grounds and practice, including Roman Law, and the 
 Common and Statutory Law of England, and concurrently with 
 this, on Sundays and in the evening of each day, the high 
 matters of theology and Church History, ancient and modern, 
 " the Hebrew tongue having been already acquired at a set 
 hour " so that the Scriptures might be read " in their own 
 original." 
 
 It is only after these "employments are well conquered," 
 and consequently not sooner than the 2oth year (I presume), 
 that the youth is admitted to a purely literary course. This is 
 to consist of choice histories, heroic poems, Attic tragedies and 
 all the famous political orations, " which, if they were not only 
 read but some of them got by memory and solemnly pro- 
 nounc't with right accent and grace (as might be taught), would
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST l6/ 
 
 endue them ever with the spirit and vigour of Demosthenes or 
 Cicero, Euripides or Sophocles." 
 
 Last of all that is to say in the 2ist year might be 
 studied the "organic Arts," viz. Logic, Rhetoric, Poetry, as 
 these are to be found treated by Aristotle, Plato and others. 
 "This," he says, "would make them soon perceive what de- 
 spicable creatures our common Rimers and play- writers be; 
 and show them what religious, what glorious and magnificent 
 use might be made of poetry, both in divine and humane 
 things." 
 
 This large curriculum would be concluded by literary 
 compositions "in every excellent matter." "When fraught 
 with an universal insight into things" will be the right season, 
 Milton says, to form them into able writers. " Then," he goes 
 on, "whether they be to speak in Parliament or counsel, 
 honour and attention would be waiting on their lips. There 
 would then also appear in pulpits other visages, other gestures 
 and stuff otherwise wrought, than what we now sit under, oft- 
 times to as great a trial of our patience as any other that they 
 preach to us." "These," he cries out, "be the studies in 
 which our noble and our gentle youth ought to bestow their 
 time in a disciplinary way from twelve to one and twenty 
 unless they rely more on their ancestors dead than on them- 
 selves living." 
 
 Milton's University curriculum is, be it noted, a curriculum 
 of Literature, Rhetoric, History, ethical Philosophy, and Law ; 
 Science is omitted. The curriculum is Humanistic, but it, 
 the real-Humanistic, that is to say, has regard to the substance 
 of what is studied rather than to the formal and linguistic.
 
 l68 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 GYMNASTIC. 
 
 " I call a complete and generous education," he says, " that 
 which fits a man to perform justly, skilfully and magnani- 
 mously all the offices both private and public, of peace and 
 war." The course of discipline which he has as yet sketched 
 out, however, would prepare only for the offices of peace ; and 
 he accordingly now proceeds to deal with gymnastic "the 
 exercises and recreations" that best agree and become these 
 studies. The day should be divided into three parts devoted 
 respectively to studies, exercise and diet. 
 
 An hour and a half before they eat at noon is to be 
 allowed the youths for exercise and due rest afterwards ; the 
 time for this being extended according as they rise early. 
 Their exercises should be fencing and wrestling " to keep them 
 healthy, nimble and strong and well in breath." " It is also 
 the likeliest means to make them grow large and tall and to 
 inspire them with a gallant and fearless courage"; which he 
 adds " being tempered with seasonable lectures and precepts to 
 them of true Fortitude and Patience will turn into a native and 
 heroick valour and make them hate the cowardise of doing 
 wrong." 
 
 With gymnastic should be combined military exercises. 
 " About two hours before supper, they are by a sudden alarum 
 or watch word, to be call'd out to their military motions, under 
 skie or covert, according to the season, as was the Roman 
 wont : first on foot, then as their age permits, on Horseback, to 
 all the Art of Cavalry ; That having in sport, but with much 
 exactness, and daily muster, serv'd out the rudiments of their 
 Souldiership in all the skill of Embattelling, Marching, En- 
 camping, Fortifying, Besieging and Battering, with all the helps 
 of ancient and modern stratagems, Tacticks and warlike maxims, 
 they may as it were out of a long War come forth renowned 
 and perfect Commanders in the service of their Country."
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 169 
 
 In this way the " Institution of Breeding " which he 
 "delineates" shall "be equally good both for Peace and 
 War." 
 
 As to relaxation from study and recreation, he would, after 
 the grounds have been well laid in the first two or three years, 
 give a holiday in Spring. He says beautifully, " In those vernal 
 seasons of the year when the air is calm and pleasant, it were 
 an injury and sullenness against nature not to go out and see 
 her riches, and partake of her rejoycing with Heaven and 
 Earth." But even this holiday he would turn to educative uses. 
 He would have the youths ride out in companies under proper 
 superintendence, to all quarters of the land, learning all places 
 of strength and studying the places most suitable for harbours, 
 ports and industries. Sometimes he would have them take to 
 sea, and visit the navy to learn there something of naval tactics. 
 " These ways would try all their peculiar gifts of nature, and if 
 there were any secret excellence among them would fetch it out 
 and give it fair opportunities to advance itself by, which could 
 not but mightily redound to the good of this nation and bring 
 into fashion again those old admired vertues and excellencies, 
 with far more advantage now in this purity of Christian 
 Knowledge." 
 
 MORAL, RELIGIOUS AND AESTHETIC TRAINING. 
 
 The moral instruction should be direct as well as indirect. 
 In addition to the study of Scripture prosecuted chiefly in the 
 evening, Cebes 1 and Plutarch in Greek and Quintilian in Latin 
 should be studied in connexion with this reading ; but here 
 " the main skill and groundwork will be to temper them such 
 
 1 Tabula (a board hence picture) Cebetis : a philosophical explanation 
 of a picture (said to be hung in the Temple of Cronus in Athens or Thebes) 
 symbolically representing human life, written by Cebes (?), a pupil of 
 Sokrates, very popular in ancient times. Sometimes it has been bound up 
 with the Enchiridion of Epictetus.
 
 I/O JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 lectures and explanations upon every opportunity as may lead 
 and draw them in willing obedience, enflamed with the study 
 of Learning and admiration of Vertue; stirr'd up with high 
 hopes of living to be brave men and worthy Patriots, dear to 
 
 God and famous to all ages infusing into their young 
 
 breasts such an ingenious and noble ardor as would not fail to 
 make many of them renowned and matchless men." 
 
 Chiefly, however, the example of their master was to 
 influence them. 
 
 At a more advanced stage when they have been prepared 
 by "years and good general precepts" they will require "a 
 special reinforcement of constant and sound endoctrinating to 
 set them right and firm, instructing them more amply in the 
 knowledge of Vertue and the hatred of Vice " : " Their young 
 and pliant affections " should with this view be led through all 
 the moral works of Plato and Xenophon, Cicero, Plutarch etc., 
 they will thus be perfected in the " knowledge of personal 
 duty" and thereafter proceed to the study of Economics. Each 
 day's work is to be closed with the study of the Bible. 
 
 Aesthetic. Milton attaches importance to music as an 
 educational agency, but he would teach it as a relief from other 
 studies and from gymnastic. " The interim," he says, " of 
 unsweating themselves regularly, and convenient rest before 
 meat may both with profit and delight be taken up in re- 
 creating and composing their travail'd spirits with the solemn 
 and divine harmonies of Musick heard or learnt ; either while 
 the skilful Organist plies his grave and fancied descant, in 
 lofty fugues, or the whole Symphony with artful and un- 
 imaginable touches adorn and grace the well studied chords of 
 some choice Composer, sometimes the Lute, or soft Organ 
 stop waiting on elegant Voices either to Religious, martial, or 
 civil Ditties ; which if wise men and Prophets be not extreamly 
 out, have a great power over dispositions and manners, to 
 smooth and make them gentle from rustick harshness and 
 distemper'd passions. The like also would not be unexpedient
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 171 
 
 after Meat to assist and cherish Nature in her first concoction, 
 and send their minds back to study in good tune and satis- 
 faction." 
 
 Of Discipline in the vulgar school sense Milton says little. 
 He believes evidently that the course of daily life which he 
 delineates will be so attractive to boys as to make this super- 
 fluous : for, speaking of his own scheme he says, " I will strait 
 conduct ye to a hill side, where I will point ye out the right 
 path of a vertuous and noble Education ; laborious indeed at 
 the first ascent, but else so smooth, so green, so full of goodly 
 prospect, and melodious sounds on every side, that the Harp 
 of Orpheus was not more charming. I doubt not but ye shall 
 have more adoe to drive our dullest and laziest youth, our 
 stocks and stubbs, from the infinite desire of such a happy 
 nurture, then we have now to hale and drag our choicest and 
 hopefullest Wits to that asinine feast of sowthistles and brambles 
 which is commonly set before them, as all the food and enter- 
 tainment of their tenderest and most docible age." 
 
 Elsewhere he suggests, but only in a remote and incidental 
 way, coercion ; for if " mild and effectual perswasions " and the 
 teacher's own example fail to gain them (as he thinks they will) 
 to an " incredible diligence," there may be " an intimation of 
 some fear, if need be." One would like to know what Milton's 
 own practice as a teacher was. We can imagine that sheer 
 stupidity would not so much irritate him as make him indignant. 
 If he vented his indignation in words the poor boy would be in 
 a pitiable plight under the torrent of vigorous vituperation of 
 which Milton was a master. It is not a violent supposition 
 that a lexicon might sometimes hurtle through the air the 
 objective point being some crass skull. In any case we may 
 be sure that the schoolroom 'scene' would be enacted after 
 the grand manner of the demigods and would, doubtless, have 
 its educative uses.
 
 1/2 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 As to travel ; Milton would postpone this till the youths 
 were three or four and twenty. They would then go, "not to 
 learn principles but to enlarge experience and make wise 
 observation " ; and, as being already cultivated men, they 
 would be well received by foreigners of eminence. 
 
 School Buildings and Apparatus. To carry out his scheme 
 of Education Milton proposes that a " spacious house and 
 ground around it fit for an Academy and big enough to lodge 
 150 persons" should be secured and placed under the govern- 
 ment of one Head. This place should be at once school and 
 University, "not making a remove to any other House of 
 Scholarship" except in the case of those who desired to 
 continue their studies in the specific faculties of I-aw and 
 Physic with a view to being practitioners. Several such 
 institutions ought to be founded throughout the country. 
 
 The reader of the Tractate will notice that every recom- 
 mendation made by Milton is accompanied with a fierce, but 
 wonderfully eloquent, attack on the then existing school 
 practice, or on the melancholy results of that defective practice 
 in every department Social Life, Letters, Preaching, Politics, 
 Administration and the Military Art. There is much in these 
 passages that recalls Carlyle. Some of them I have already 
 quoted and I shall here conclude my exposition with his 
 invective on Universities " And for the usual method of 
 teaching Arts, I deem it to be an old errour of Universities not 
 yet well recover'd from the Scholastick grossness of barbarous 
 ages, that in stead of beginning with Arts most easie, and those 
 be such as are most obvious to the sence, they present their 
 young unmatriculated Novices at first coming with the most 
 intellective abstractions of Logick and Metaphysicks ; So that 
 they having but newly left those Grammatick flats and shallows 
 where they stuck unreasonably to learn a few words with 
 lamentable construction, and now on the sudden transported
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 173 
 
 under another climate to be tost and turmoil'd with their 
 unballasted wits in fadomless and unquiet deeps of controversie, 
 do for the most part grow into hatred and contempt of 
 Learning, mockt and deluded all this while with ragged 
 Notions and Babblements, while they expected worthy and 
 delightful knowledge ; till poverty or youthful years call them 
 importunately their several wayes, and hasten them with the 
 sway of friends either to an ambitious and mercenary, or 
 ignorantly zealous Divinity ; Some allur'd to the trade of Law, 
 grounding their purposes not on the prudent and heavenly 
 contemplation of justice and equity which was never taught 
 them, but on the promising and pleasing thoughts of litigious 
 terms, fat contentions, and flowing fees ; others betake them to 
 State affairs, with souls so unprincipl'd in virtue, and true 
 generous breeding, that flattery, and Court Shifts and tyrannous 
 Aphorisms appear to them the highest points of wisdom ; 
 instilling their barren hearts with a conscientious slavery, if, as 
 I rather think, it be not fain'd. Others lastly of a more 
 delicious and airie spirit, retire themselves knowing no better, 
 to the enjoyments of ease and luxury, living out their daies in 
 feast and jollity ; which indeed is the wisest and the safest 
 course of all these, unless they were with more integrity 
 undertaken. And these are the fruits of misspending our prime 
 youth at the Schools and Universities as we do, either in 
 learning meer words or such things chiefly, as were better 
 unlearnt." 
 
 By way of criticism ; I would first take exception to 
 Milton's proposal to institute isolated boy colonies. To shut 
 up 150 youths from the age of 12 to 21 and put them through 
 a severe curriculum of study is, altogether apart from the 
 scheme of study which may be adopted, a proposal funda- 
 mentally unsound. Boys, like men, learn by contact with the 
 world as it is, and in their own families they acquire that kind 
 of intellectual and moral training which prepares them best for
 
 174 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 the world we live in. Milton's scheme has most of the 
 disadvantages that attend monastic life, and is an exaggeration 
 of the English Public School system from which even Sparta 
 would have shrunk. 
 
 The rigid system of intellectual and physical discipline to 
 be carried out in these prison-houses is to be condemned. 
 Neither mind, nor body, can grow to its best if it is always 
 laced tight and dressed in regimentals. 
 
 A second obvious criticism is that Milton in allowing only 
 one year for learning as much Latin and Greek as was "scraped 
 together " in seven or eight, absurdly exaggerates the aptitude 
 of boys and the capacity of teachers. 
 
 As regards the substance of intellectual instruction : even 
 admitting that real-naturalistic instruction is alone valuable up 
 to the age of say 1 8 or 1 9, it certainly would not be practicable 
 to carry boys through the extensive course of reading which 
 Milton advocates. He enormously over-estimates the capacity 
 of the average pupil. A boy would certainly be 15 years of 
 age before his knowledge of Latin (even with the best teaching) 
 or his maturity of intelligence would make it possible for him 
 to begin to read with advantage the authors named by Milton 
 as coming first in the curriculum. The work could simply not 
 be done in any save the most perfunctory manner, even 
 allowing for the fact that some of the books were to be " read 
 to " the boys. On the ground of mere practicability, therefore, 
 the scheme of intellectual instruction must be pronounced a 
 wild imagination, even if it were sound educationally. 
 
 But it may be said, and said truly, these objections do not 
 touch the substance of Milton's theory, which is this : The Real 
 or Sensible should alone (with religion and morals) be taught 
 until a boy is 18 or 19 years of age. Even the humble 
 linguistic exercise of composition is to be eschewed until the 
 boy is full of matter. Now this principle can perfectly well be 
 given effect to if we choose to do so. We might confine 
 youths till they had reached the age of 18 solely to real-
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 175 
 
 naturalistic studies. Latin and Greek, of course, we should 
 now, on Milton's principles, exclude entirely, inasmuch as they 
 could in these days contribute nothing to the knowledge of 
 the youth save what was better not learned, because it would 
 have to be unlearned. A few boys might be allowed to take 
 up Latin and Greek on the special ground that they were to 
 continue their education throughout the university stage in 
 which theology, oratory, and literature generally were to be 
 the Miltonic study. But it is doubtful whether the time 
 required for languages of such difficulty would, on the Miltonic 
 theory, be well spent even by the few in these days. By 
 means of good translations in his own or in foreign modern 
 tongues, a youth might be admitted to as much of ancient 
 eloquence and thought as was requisite for general culture or 
 for specialized work. 
 
 The conclusion then would be, if we translate Milton into 
 the conditions of the igth century, that none save those 
 ultimately going forward to the university should waste their time 
 over the ancient languages. English, French, German, and 
 Italian would of course take their place in all schools, on the 
 ground that these are now the channels of all real and realistic 
 knowledge, and at the same time are vehicles of philosophy and 
 literature adequate to the full culture of a man. This is truly 
 what Milton proposes when we translate him into contemporary 
 and equivalent terms. 
 
 Even the professed philologer and theologian would study 
 Latin and Greek (if he studied these at all) and modern 
 languages not for their own sake, but solely for the sake of the 
 substance of the writings to be met with in the various tongues. 
 By the material of thought, the substance of morality, the ideas 
 of religion, man, according to Milton, can be made all we can 
 mentally and morally make him. Much hard work, much 
 discipline are, doubtless, needed to acquire the material and 
 substance of all knowledge, but the mental discipline which the 
 curriculum of study would necessitate is not valued by Milton,
 
 1/6 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 not thought of. It is simply the knowledge acquired, the 
 mental equipment he cares for. By knowledge we are saved, 
 not by discipline or training. Milton, if he were answering an 
 opponent, would doubtless say that he had in his thoughts, 
 implicitly, the whole idea of intellectual and moral discipline as 
 well as instruction. But the answer is, that his theory of 
 education does not take account of the former as an end in 
 itself, and therefore falls to be ranked among those schemes 
 which think that knowledge will accomplish all. Wisely 
 remarked Milton's immediate successor in educational history, 
 John Locke, " Men of much reading are greatly learned but 
 may be little knowing." Mark Pattison also says, " Milton 
 saw strongly, as many have done before and since, one weak 
 point in the practice of schools, namely, the small result of 
 much time. He fell into the natural error of the inexperienced 
 teacher, that of supposing that the remedy was the ingestion of 
 much and diversified intelligible matter. It requires much 
 observation of young minds to discover that the rapid in- 
 culcation of unassimilable information stupefies the faculties 
 instead of training them." 
 
 Let me by way of caution, however, repeat that Milton does 
 not confine himself to the real of sense, but embraces in his 
 scheme the real of the humanities. At the fitting age the youth, 
 as we have seen, is to be introduced to literature and theology 
 and philosophy. A strictly accurate exhibition therefore of 
 Milton's system would show that he confines himself almost 
 wholly to the realistic of sense (but always including moral and 
 religious instruction and training) up to a certain age (say 18), 
 and thereafter takes the youth into that other realm of the 
 Real, viz. Poetry, Politics, Oratory and Philosophy. 
 
 Milton's conception of the substance of the education of a 
 man has, if we take it as a whole, an air of magnificence. But it 
 is crude in its general conception not thoroughly thought out. 
 
 His prime defect is that he takes account only of a limited 
 class of the community, and his educational views suffer from
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST I// 
 
 this. They were limited and narrow. Even judged by the 
 needs of this limited class his curriculum of instruction is 
 inadequate. He keeps in view the final stage of instruction, 
 which comprehends all that is best in Humanism ; but the 
 long road that has to be traversed to reach this is occupied 
 with Latin and Greek and the realistic instruction to be found 
 in ancient writers. The secondary school would be on his 
 principles a home neither of discipline nor culture. 
 
 Under Milton's scheme accordingly the mass of boys would 
 enter life unhumanized by their education, and with their 
 minds filled, or rather, congested, not disciplined and 
 trained. Even the few who went forward to university study 
 could not, without great, perhaps insuperable, difficulty, enter 
 on the ' organic ' studies and the pursuit of literature and 
 philosophy. Moreover instruction in the Latin and Greek 
 languages, which alone saved Milton's primary and secondary 
 course from pure sense-realism, would in these days be a waste 
 of time, for in all matters of science our modern books are 
 alone worthy of study. 
 
 Samuel Johnson in a criticism of Milton puts the antagon- 
 istic view exceedingly well : " The truth," he says, " is, that the 
 knowledge of external nature, and the sciences which that 
 knowledge requires or includes, are not the great or frequent 
 business of the human mind. Whether we provide for action 
 or conversation, whether we wish to be useful or pleasing, the 
 first requisite is the religious and moral knowledge of right and 
 wrong ; the next is an acquaintance with the history of man- 
 kind and with those examples which may be said to embody 
 truth and prove by events the reasonableness of opinions. 
 Prudence and Justice are virtues and excellencies of all places. 
 We are perpetually moralists, but we are geometricians only by 
 chance. Our intercourse with intellectual nature is necessary ; 
 our speculations upon matter are voluntary and at leisure. 
 Physiological learning is of such rare emergence, that one may 
 know another half his life, without being able to estimate his 
 L. 12
 
 178 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 skill in hydrostatics or astronomy ; but his moral and pru- 
 dential character immediately appears. Those authors, there- 
 fore, are to be read at schools that supply most axioms of 
 prudence, most principles of moral truth, and most materials 
 for conversation ; and these purposes are best served by poets, 
 orators, and historians. Let me not be censured for this 
 digression as pedantic or paradoxical ; for, if I have Milton 
 against me, I have Socrates on my side. It was his labour to 
 turn philosophy from the study of nature to speculations upon 
 life ; but the innovators whom I oppose are turning off 
 attention from life to nature. They seem to think, that we are 
 placed here to watch the growth of plants, or the motion of 
 the stars. Socrates was rather of opinion that what we had to 
 learn was, how to do good and avoid evil 1 ." 
 
 Johnson, however, omits to notice the very large place 
 assigned by Milton to the moral and religious education of 
 boys. In this respect, indeed, Milton stands out conspicuously 
 as an advocate of direct moral instruction, while the practice of 
 schools, then and now, is to rely almost wholly on such in- 
 direct instruction as school events may yield and on the 
 dogmatism of religious creeds. A just criticism would be that 
 Milton did not see the importance of language and literature 
 as a moralizing agent in the education of the young, and so 
 dispensed with them till it was too late to make use of them. 
 
 A serious error of omission in Milton is due to his 
 contemptuous ignoring of the work which the Baconian 
 school of educationalists was doing. Method is not even 
 mentioned by him. His treatise keeps steadily in view a great 
 aim, but in other respects it presents us, not with a method, 
 but only with a ratio stwiiorum or Lehrplan, and that a bad one. 
 
 Nor can we approve of Milton's giving a practical and 
 useful turn to play. The essence of play is that it shall be 
 useless. The objection may also be urged that Milton's course 
 of instruction is not boyish enough for boys ; but while recog- 
 
 1 Johnson's Lives, vol. i. p. 95.
 
 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 179 
 
 nizing the force of this objection, I am yet disposed to agree 
 with Mr Browning when he says', " One of the main hopes of 
 the improvement of education lies in adopting the truth that 
 manly and serious studies are capable of being handled and 
 mastered by intelligent schoolboys." 
 
 Because of the obvious defects of Milton's scheme, it has 
 been the habit of schoolmasters to treat his Tractate with 
 something like contempt, or, at least, to ignore it. Drop the 
 mere externalities of the scheme however and contemplate the 
 ideas inherent in it, and we find much that is valuable : (i) A 
 condemnation of exclusive Latin and Greek instruction with 
 which all thinking men now agree. (2) A condemnation of the 
 verbalism and formalism of school teaching, which also now 
 meets with universal acceptance. (3) An advocacy of nature- 
 instruction and of practical handwork : who is there among 
 thinking educationalists now to question this ? (4) An earnest 
 plea for direct moral instruction : still awaiting response from 
 our schools. (5) A denunciation of attempts at composition 
 without material to write about. (6) Generally, the putting of 
 the study of the real of sense and the real of the Humanities 
 before the study of the organic arts Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric : 
 " Matter before Form," as Comenius was then preaching and 
 which all intelligent teachers (at least theoretically) now accept. 
 (7) The recommendation of technical instruction in its widest 
 sense. (8) The advocacy of gymnastic and physical drill, now 
 accepted elements in all properly organized education. (9) The 
 teaching of Latin Grammar by means of the English tongue and 
 not in Latin as was then, and till quite recently, universal 2 . 
 Even his encyclopaedism may be defended as a necessary 
 protest against the meagre intellectual life of the schools of his 
 time. And greater than all was the profound conviction, which 
 
 1 Educational Theories, p. 97. 
 
 - Milton's first publication after Paradise Lost was a Latin Grammar 
 for Beginners within the compass of 65 pages and written in English. It is 
 entitled Accedence Commenc't Grammar, 1669. 
 
 12 2
 
 180 JOHN MILTON, THE CLASSICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIST 
 
 he has handed down to all worthy to inherit it, of the efficacy of 
 education to mould the youth of a country to virtue, generosity 
 and sacrifice. Professor Masson well says, " The noble moral 
 glow that pervades the Tract, the mood of magnanimity in 
 which it is conceived and the faith it inculcates in the power of 
 the young spirit are merits everlasting 1 ." 
 
 Milton himself, remember, recognizes the ideal character of 
 his scheme of education. For he tells us that "this is not 
 a bow for every man to shoot in that counts himself a teacher ; 
 but will require sinews almost equal to those which Homer 
 gave Ulysses." And in truth this is what every man is driven 
 to say who seriously thinks about national education its nature 
 and its possibilities, viz. where are we to find the Educators ? 
 Few are born in the purple : how can we make the average 
 man worthy to assume it? 
 
 Some writers would class Milton among the Realists in 
 education, but this is only a partial truth. It is true that 
 Milton was of opinion that the books read by boys, both in the 
 primary and secondary stages, should treat of things, but his 
 whole scheme of higher education is, as we have seen, literary 
 and oratorical and musical essentially Humanistic. The 
 distinctive note of the earlier Humanists is that while " real " 
 subjects should be taught, the governing studies of youth should 
 be Language and Literature with History ; the strict Realist, on 
 the other hand, would make the Real or Naturalistic along with 
 Arithmetic and Mathematics dominant. Even language should 
 be taught, as a subordinate though necessary study, mainly 
 through things, according to the Realist, while in the case of 
 foreign tongues it is the utilities of life that govern instruction 
 in them not language and literature as such. This being so, 
 to class Milton among sense-realists is incorrect. He stands 
 by himself. I have called him a Classical Encyclopaedist. 
 
 Note. The quotations in the above Lecture are printed verbatim 
 from Mr Browning's edition of the Tractate (Pitt Press). 
 
 1 Professor Masson in Life of Milton.
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST. 
 
 Introduction. Value of Education. Aim of Education. Vigour 
 of body. Virtue or Morality and Good Breeding. Habit. Fun- 
 damental Principle of Locke, Authority. Enforcing of Authority, 
 (a) Punishment in relation to Moral Training, (b) Punishment 
 in relation to Instruction, (c) Rewards. Substance and Method of 
 Moral Training. 
 
 JOHN LOCKE was born in 1632 and died in 1704. His 
 Thoughts on Education were published in 1693. 
 
 Locke is the most important English writer on education 
 next to Ascham. I devote considerable space to him because 
 no writer on education surpasses him in my opinion. His 
 personal experience, however, was limited. As tutor of Lord 
 Shaftesbury's son, and thereafter as adviser and guide of the 
 education of that son's children, he had his attention directed 
 to the subject practically ; but his knowledge of school work 
 was restricted to his own experience as a boy at Westminster 
 and as a lecturer in Oxford. Hence many defects in his book 
 and many merits ; defects arising from his ignorance of the 
 routine of the school and the difficulties which a master has to 
 encounter ; merits arising from the close and paternal relation 
 in which he stood to his pupils. This close and paternal 
 relation led him to see that the daily moral training had far 
 more effect in producing the ultimate result at which all wise
 
 1 82 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 educationalists aim cultured, virtuous, and generally well 
 informed and capable men than instruction in the narrower 
 scholastic sense. He was led however to underrate both the 
 importance and difficulties of instruction ; and valuable as were 
 his thoughts on moral training, much significance cannot be 
 attached to his treatment of Method as applied to those 
 subjects which all must learn, and which he says "may be 
 had into the bargain, at a very easy rate, by methods that 
 may be thought upon." 
 
 While residing in Holland he had corresponded with his 
 friend Mr Clark, member for Taunton in King William's 
 Parliament, on the bringing up of that gentleman's children ; 
 and yielding to the solicitations of many of his friends, 
 especially of William Molyneux, his Dublin correspondent, he 
 reduced his letters to shape and published them in 1693 under 
 the title Some Thoughts concerning Education. The form in 
 which the Thoughts were originally cast explains the want of 
 method and the frequent repetitions. 
 
 The admirable, but loosely constructed book on The 
 Conduct of the Human Understanding, though not professedly 
 written as an educational treatise, ought to be read with the 
 Thoughts, and as the complement of them, if we would 
 understand fully Locke's real views and adequately exhibit 
 them ; for what is the conduct of the understanding, or in 
 Spinoza's phrase Emendatio Intellectus, but education? 
 
 In my exposition I of course follow Locke closely, but 
 I endeavour to give a more articulate shape to what he has 
 somewhat loosely set down ; and it is because I do so, that I 
 think my exposition will be of service to the student or teacher. 
 
 Locke seems to have been ignorant of Comenius and Ascham, 
 but he must have known Milton's Tractate, and the influence 
 of Montaigne is everywhere conspicuous. Had it not, indeed, 
 been for the influence of Montaigne and the circumstances 
 in which his Thoughts were written, he could not have, I think, 
 so entirely parted company with his philosophical system when
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 183 
 
 he came to write on education. It is true we find a treatment 
 which is generally in perfect consonance with the doctrine of 
 the Essay on the Human Understanding, but there is no 
 purposed or conscious connexion ; nor could this have been 
 expected in a book which he himself says is rather of the 
 nature of " a private conversation " between two friends than 
 "a discourse designed for public view 1 ." 
 
 Value of Education. 
 
 To begin with, we must note carefully that Locke does not 
 think of the education of the people any more than Milton does. 
 He considers the education of a young gentleman only. And 
 as he presumes that the education is domestic, his remarks are 
 not always very applicable to schools. Still substantially, 
 mutatis mutandis, many of his principles are of universal 
 application. By way of introduction he points to the effects 
 of education in a well-known passage, in the first part of which 
 he somewhat exaggerates the influence of education. 
 
 i, pp. i, 2. "A sound mind in a sound body is a short 
 but full description of a happy state in this world. He that has 
 these two has little more to wish for : and he that wants either 
 of them will be but little the better for anything else. Men's 
 happiness or misery is most part of their own making. He 
 whose mind directs not wisely will never take the right way, 
 and he whose body is crazy and feeble will never be able to 
 advance in it. I confess there are some men's constitutions of 
 body and mind so vigorous and well framed by nature, that 
 they need not much assistance from others, but by the strength 
 of their natural genius they are from their cradles carried 
 towards what is excellent and by the privilege of their happy 
 constitution are able to do wonders 2 ." 
 
 " But examples of this kind are but few, and I think I may 
 say that of all the men we meet with, nine parts of ten are 
 
 1 Letter addressed to Mr Clark when sending the book to him. 
 
 2 The quotations are from Quick's edition.
 
 184 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 what they are, good or evil, useful or not, by their education. 
 It is that which makes the great difference in mankind. The 
 little, or almost insensible impressions on our tender infancies, 
 have very important and lasting consequences, and there it is 
 (as in the fountains of some rivers) where a gentle application 
 of the hand turns the flexible waters into channels that makes 
 them take quite contrary courses ; and by this little direction 
 given them at first in the source, they receive different 
 tendencies, and arrive at last at very remote and distant places." 
 
 Aim of Education. 
 Locke's educational aims may be summed up thus : 
 
 I. Vigour of body. 
 
 II. Virtue in the soul, with its manifestation in good 
 breeding : wisdom in conduct. I add wisdom because towards 
 the end of his Treatise, p. 200, he says, "The great business 
 of all is Virtue and Wisdom. 
 
 Nullum numen abest si sit Prudentia 1 ." 
 
 III. Knowledge, or mental acquisition: but this sub- 
 ordinate to health of body, and virtue, and good breeding. 
 
 His first concern is for the corpus sanum, the "case," the 
 "clay cottage." 
 
 I. THE BODY. 
 
 He recommends absence of cockering and generally the 
 hardening of childhood. Bare heads, especially in bed, and 
 leaky shoes (!). 
 
 Swimming and exposure of head and person generally 
 urged. 
 
 As to girls he says, " The nearer they come to the hardship 
 of their brothers in their education the greater advantage they 
 
 1 The more logical order, perhaps, would be to make Wisdom a fourth 
 head as being the fruit of II and III.
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 185 
 
 will receive from it all the remaining part of their lives." 
 It is of importance, however, in this climate to be careful 
 against chills after exercise. Women guarded very strongly 
 against tight-lacing. Nature alone can develope the frame 
 harmoniously. P. 7. 
 
 Diet should be simple. No flesh meat for the first three 
 years. Careful chewing. Much bread should be eaten. Small 
 beer to be allowed if taken with bread. Drink no more than 
 natural thirst requires. Above all things the young should 
 avoid wine and all strong drinks. Fruits, except stone fruits, 
 if quite ripe, wholesome for children in moderation of course. 
 Early to bed and early to rise : quantity of sleep not to be 
 limited in case of very young children ; very much a matter 
 of temperament. Children to be awoke from sleep gently 
 ( 21, p. 1 6), and "give them none but kind words and 
 usage until they be come perfectly to themselves." Hard beds 
 recommended. 
 
 II. VIRTUE OR MORALITY. 
 
 (i) Habit in relation to early training in virtue and 
 the hardening of body and mind. 
 
 " Due care being had to keep the body in vigour and 
 strength, so that it may be able to execute and obey the 
 orders of the mind; the next and principal business is, to 
 set the mind right, that on all occasions it may be disposed 
 to consent to nothing but what may be suitable to the dignity 
 and excellency of a rational creature. 
 
 " If what I have said in the beginning of this discourse be 
 true, as I do not doubt but it is, viz. that the difference to be 
 found in the manners and abilities of men is owing more to 
 their education than to anything else, we have reason to 
 conclude that great care is to be had of forming children's 
 minds and giving them that reasoning early, which shall
 
 1 86 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 influence their lives always after; for when they do well or 
 ill the praise or blame will be laid there, and when anything 
 is done awkwardly, the common saying will pass upon them, 
 that it is ' suitable to their breeding.' 
 
 "As the strength of the body lies chiefly in being able to 
 endure hardships, so also does that of the mind. And the 
 great principle and foundation of all virtue and worth is placed 
 in this, that a man is able to deny himself his own desires, 
 cross his own inclinations, and purely follow what reason directs 
 as best, though the appetite lean the other way. 
 
 "The great mistake I have observed in people breeding 
 their children has been that this has not been taken care 
 enough of in due season, that the mind has not been made 
 obedient to discipline and pliant to reason, when at first it 
 was most tender, most easy to be bowed." ["The most early 
 habits are the most lasting," says Bishop Butler a truism.] 
 
 " It is not that the performance of a single act is in itself 
 to be deprecated perhaps : but the formation of Habit is all 
 important 1 . 
 
 " When a child is young, therefore, obedience and control of 
 temper and sacrifice of desires must be taught. Why should a 
 child who has had his will up to the age of 14 or 15 be 
 expected to submit to checking then ? And if- checked, with 
 what hope of true success?" Pp. 20, 21. 
 
 "Try it in a horse or dog or any other creature and see 
 whether the ill and resty tricks they have learned when young 
 are easily to be mended when they are knit; and yet none 
 of these creatures are half so wilful and proud or half so 
 desirous to be masters of themselves and others as man." 
 
 P. 22. 
 
 "The having desires accommodated to the apprehensions 
 and relish of those several ages is not the fault ; but the not 
 
 1 Erasmus says : Plato " adolescentem quod lusisset aleam graviter 
 increpuit : qui quum dixisset, Sic objurgas ob rem parvam ? At parvum non 
 est inquit assuescere." Apophth. vn.
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST l8/ 
 
 having them subject to the rules and restraints of reason : 
 the difference lies not in having or not having appetites but 
 in the power to govern and deny ourselves in them. He 
 that is not used to submit his will to the reason of others 
 when he is young, will scarce hearken to submit to his 
 own reason when he is of an age to make use of it. And 
 what kind of a man such a one is like to prove is easy to 
 foresee." P. 22. 
 
 Locke expresses his surprise that men turn out morally as 
 well as they do, when we consider how they are brought up. 
 The bad example of parents, the violence which takes the 
 place of reason, the love of dress" encouraged in girls, lying 
 and equivocations seen in the family or overlooked when done 
 for the interest of the family, over-eating and drinking, etc. 
 
 " It seems plain to me," he says, " that the principle of 
 all virtue and excellency lies in a power of denying ourselves 
 the satisfaction of our own desires, where reason does not 
 authorize them. This power is to be got and improved 
 by custom, made easy and familiar by an early practice. 
 If therefore I might be heard, I would advise that contrary 
 to the ordinary way, children should be used to submit 
 their desires and go without their longings, even from their 
 very cradles. The first thing they should learn to know 
 should be that they were not to have anything because it 
 pleased them, but because it was thought fit for them. If 
 things suitable to their wants were supplied to them, so that 
 they were never suffered to have what they once cried for, 
 they would karn to be content without it, would never with 
 brawling and peevishness contend for mastery, nor be half so 
 uneasy to themselves or others as they are, because from the 
 first beginning they are not thus handled. If they were never 
 suffered to obtain their desire by the impatience they expressed 
 for it, they would no more cry for it than they do for the 
 moon." P. 25. 
 
 The main thing accordingly is the formation of good habits.
 
 1 88 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 " Habits," he says, " work more constantly and with greater 
 facility than Reason, which when we have most need of it, 
 is seldom fairly consulted and more rarely obeyed." This can 
 be accomplished only by seeing that certain things are done 
 and done rightly. And this you will do by watchfulness and 
 by encouragement, and kind words and reminders and not by 
 force. Concentrate yourself on one or two habits at a time, 
 and when these are pretty well formed go to others. 
 
 It will be noticed (and this is a guide to the understanding 
 of Locke) that just as he advocates the hardening of the body 
 he advocates the hardening of the mind by refusing children 
 all they want, simply because they want it. This kind of 
 hardening is, I think, irrational. The true principle of action 
 is rather this Let children have what they want, unless their 
 having it is hurtful to themselves or hurtful or annoying to 
 others. Training to virtue is a training not to sacrifice for 
 the sake of sacrifice, but to sacrifice of some one object to 
 another, of the lower to the higher, the worse to the better. 
 To this, children should be daily inured ; and Dugald Stewart 
 well says : 
 
 " To a certain hardness of character, not unfrequently united 
 with an insensibility to the charms of poetry and eloquence, 
 may partly be ascribed the severe and forbidding spirit which 
 has suggested some of the maxims in his Tract on Education. 
 He had been treated himself it would appear with very little 
 indulgence by his parents, and probably was led by that filial 
 veneration, which he always expressed for their memory, to 
 ascribe to the early habits of self-denial imposed on him by 
 their ascetic system of ethics the existence of those moral 
 qualities which he owed to the regulating influence of his 
 own reason in fostering his natural dispositions, and which 
 under a gentler and more skilful culture might have assumed 
 a still more engaging and amiable form. His father, who had 
 served in the Parliament's army, seems to have retained 
 through life that austerity of manners which characterized his
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 189 
 
 puritanical associates ; and notwithstanding the comparative 
 enlargement and cultivation of Mr Locke's mind, something 
 of this hereditary leaven, if I am not mistaken, continued to 
 operate upon many of his opinions and habits of thinking. 
 If in the Conduct of the Understanding he trusted (as many 
 have thought) too much to nature and laid too little stress 
 on logical rules, he certainly fell into the opposite extreme in 
 everything connected with the culture of the heart, distrusting 
 nature altogether and placing his sole confidence in the effects 
 of a systematical and vigilant discipline." 
 
 (2) Fundamental Principle of Training Authority. 
 
 The condition essential to the training of children to the habit 
 of virtue is the recognition by them of the authority of the 
 educator be he parent or master. 
 
 "Those then that intend ever to govern their children 
 should begin it while they are very little, and look that they 
 perfectly comply with the will of their parents. Would you 
 have your son obedient to you when past a child, be sure 
 then to establish the authority of a father as soon as he is 
 capable of submission and can understand in whose power he 
 is. If you would have him stand in awe of you, imprint it in 
 its infancy ; and as he approaches more to a man, admit him 
 nearer to your familiarity ; so shall you have him your obedient 
 subject (as is fit) whilst he is a child, and your affectionate 
 friend when he is a man." P. 27. 
 
 "Thus much for the settling your authority over your 
 children in general. Fear and awe ought to give you the 
 first power over their minds, and love of friendship in riper 
 years to hold it, for the time must come when they will be 
 past the rod and correction, and then if the love of you 
 make them not obedient and dutiful, if the love of virtue and 
 reputation keep them not in laudable courses, I ask, what hold
 
 190 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 will you have upon them to turn to it ? Indeed, fear of having 
 a scanty portion if they displease you, may make them slaves 
 to your estate but they will be nevertheless ill and wicked in 
 private : and that restraint will not last always. Every man 
 must sometime or other be trusted to himself and his own 
 conduct and he that is a good and virtuous and able man, 
 must be made so within. And therefore what he is to receive 
 from Education, which is to sway and influence his life, must 
 be something put into him betimes : habits woven with the 
 very principles of his nature and not a counterfeit carriage and 
 dissembled outside, put on by fear, only to avoid the present 
 anger of a father who perhaps may disinherit him." 
 
 Locke pushes the necessity of establishing a feeling of awe 
 and fear in the child's mind a great deal too far. Respect for 
 authority and obedience can be secured by better and juster 
 means. The assumption is, that there is no instinctive feeling 
 of reverence in the human mind. If there be this, then all we 
 have to do, is to conduct ourselves as rightful authorities ought 
 to conduct themselves, in order to secure respect and obedience. 
 Then the affections of children being active we can make obe- 
 dience a pleasure to them through their regard for our affection 
 and esteem. Mr Daniell truly says, " Had Locke been a parent 
 he might have known that there was no greater need of im- 
 periousness and severity in dealing with infancy than in dealing 
 with adolescence." 
 
 (3) Enforcing of Authority, 
 (a) Punishments in relation to moral training. 
 
 To secure the above results, which (as has been shown) are 
 to be obtained by a process of training or discipline under 
 authority, does not involve punishment. 
 
 "To bring a young man to [the Habit of ] submitting his 
 appetite to Reason, I know nothing which so much contributes 
 as the Love of Praise and Commendation." * * " Make
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 19 1 
 
 his mind as sensible of Credit and Shame as may be : and 
 when you have done that you have put a principle into him 
 which will influence his actions when you are not by * * * 
 and which will be the proper stock whereon afterwards to graff 
 the true principles of Morality and Religion." 200. 
 
 This is Locke's great instrument of moral training. But 
 the child may not respond to praise or blame. What then ? 
 Must we compel from without by flogging? Locke does not 
 answer this wholly in the negative, though he denounces 
 severe punishment. 
 
 43, p. 19. "A great severity of punishment does but 
 very little good, nay, great harm in education, and I think it 
 will be found that cet. par. these children who have been most 
 chastised seldom make the best men." Now why should a child 
 care for your orders, or for your praise, or blame at all? Locke 
 does not ask or answer this save by assuming the existence of 
 an unquestioned authority. But awe must be implanted and 
 for this purpose severity must be increased if necessary. 
 
 Severity so as to secure awe and obedience should however 
 be got over, before children have memories to retain the 
 beginning of it. In this way it will seem natural to them and 
 be unconsciously established and more rational relations may 
 then gradually be established. That the bringing up must be 
 rational is evident from this that we desire to produce an 
 inclination to virtue from within (Positive Morality). If there 
 be too much curbing and severity the spirits are abased and 
 broken, the timid never become worth anything, although it is 
 to be admitted on the other hand that those who are by nature 
 lively and spirited may throw off the oppression and become 
 able men. 
 
 46, p. 30. " He that has found a way, how to keep up a 
 child's spirit, easy, active and free, and yet at the same time to 
 restrain him from many things he has a mind to, and to draw 
 him to things that are uneasy to him ; he I say that knows how 
 to reconcile these seeming contradictions has in my opinion
 
 Ip2 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 got the true secret of education." But still he has suggested 
 no means but praise and blame. 
 
 47, p. 30. "The usual lazy and short way by chastise- 
 ment and the rod which is the only instrument of government 
 that tutors generally know or ever think of, is the most unfit of 
 any to be used in education." 
 
 48, p. 30. " This kind of punishment contributes not at 
 all to the mastery of our natural propensity to indulge corporal 
 and present pleasure and to avoid pain at any rate, but rather 
 encourages it, and therefore strengthens that in us, which is the 
 root from whence spring all vicious actions and all irregularities 
 of life. For what other motive, but of sensual pleasure and 
 pain does a child act by who drudges at his book against his 
 inclination, or abstains from eating unwholesome fruit that he 
 takes pleasure in, only out of fear of a whipping ? He in this 
 way only prefers the greater corporal pleasure or avoids the 
 greater corporal pain. And what is it to govern his actions 
 and direct his conduct by such motives as these ? What is it I 
 say but to cherish that principle in him which it is our business 
 to root out and destroy? And therefore I cannot think any 
 correction useful to a child, where the shame of suffering for 
 having done amiss, does not work more upon him than the 
 pain." 
 
 49, p. 31. "This sort of correction naturally breeds an 
 aversion to that which it is the tutor's business to create a 
 liking to. How obvious is it to observe that children come to 
 hate things which were at first acceptable to them when they 
 find themselves whipped and chid and teased about them ? 
 And it is not to be wondered at in them, when grown men 
 would not be able to be reconciled to anything by such ways. 
 Who is there that would not be disgusted with any innocent 
 recreation, in itself indifferent to him, if he should with blows 
 or ill language be hauled to it when he had no mind ; or be 
 constantly so treated for some circumstances in his application 
 to it? This is natural to be so. Offensive circumstances
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 193 
 
 ordinarily infect innocent things, which they are joined with : 
 and the very sight of a cup, wherein any one uses to take 
 nauseous physic, turns his stomach, so that nothing will relish 
 well out of it, though the cup be never so clean and well-shaped 
 and of the richest materials." 
 
 5j P- 3 1 - Such a sort of slavish discipline makes a 
 slavish temper. The child submits and dissembles obedience 
 whilst the fear of the rod hangs over him : but when that is 
 removed and by being out of sight he can promise himself im- 
 punity, he gives the greater scope to his natural inclination ; 
 which by this way is not at all altered, but on the contrary 
 heightened and increased in him ; and after such restraint 
 breaks out usually with the more violence; or ( 51) "If 
 severity carried to the highest pitch does prevail and works 
 a cure upon the present unruly distemper it is often by 
 bringing in the room of it a worse and more dangerous disease 
 by breaking the mind ; and then in the place of a disorderly 
 young fellow, you have a low-spirited moped creature, who, 
 however with his unnatural sobriety he may please silly 
 people, who commend tame, inactive children, because they 
 make no noise, nor give them any trouble, yet at last will 
 probably prove as uncomfortable a thing to their friends, as they 
 will be all their lives a useless thing to themselves and others." 
 
 What Locke means in his apparently contradictory state- 
 ments is this : Do not exercise severity, do not resort to 
 punishment even in the details of moral training. Attract and 
 guide to goodness, do not coerce. But you are helpless to 
 begin with and all through, unless you have authority and 
 unless that authority is recognized. Accordingly, this central 
 virtue in the child respect and obedience must be estab- 
 lished in him somehow and at all hazards as the foundation of 
 all possible moral training. Any amount of severity is justi- 
 fiable in the interests of authority pure and simple. But 
 this once established, coercion, castigation and chiding are 
 hurtful. 
 
 L. 13
 
 194 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 It may be here noted that at the time Locke wrote great 
 severity was practised by both parents and schoolmasters. 
 Hallam says, "The mode of treatment seems to have been 
 passionate and barbarous severity, alternating with foolish in- 
 dulgence. The spirits [of children] were often broken down 
 and their ingenuousness destroyed by the former, their habits 
 of self-will and sensuality confirmed by the latter" (Lit. 
 Hist. ii. 183). 
 
 () Punishment in relation to instruction. 
 
 As might be expected Locke returns to this question of 
 coercion and punishment in connexion with intellectual work, 
 and speaks substantially as follows : 
 
 He objects to forcing children to learn. We must take 
 advantage of the natural disposition to learn when we find it 
 and make the most of it. We are not always in the humour 
 to do even the things which we are really fond of. Why then 
 expect children to be always ready? The seasons should be 
 warily observed and taken advantage of, and if we have to call 
 on them to apply themselves when they are not disposed, we 
 should prepare their minds for the task dispose them to it, 
 and so gradually accustom them to get a dominion over them- 
 selves and to be able on choice to turn from one thing to 
 another, and so forth ! 
 
 This course of procedure, even if desirable, is manifestly 
 only practicable where there are only one or two pupils under 
 a man who lives with them. In my opinion it is not desirable. 
 We have to form the habit of putting a pressure on one's self. 
 This is the truest of all discipline. It is not merely an intellec- 
 tual, but a moral, discipline. Energizing of will to overcome 
 difficulty is the root of all virtue. Moreover, a fixed time for 
 studies once recognized is more easily observed from day to 
 day. The formation of intellectual habit is just as easy as the 
 formation of moral habit.
 
 195 
 
 Chiding is as bad as blows, Locke says, in giving instruction 
 just as in moral training. A nod or look should suffice, and 
 when words are used they should be calm and serious, not 
 passionate. Children easily distinguish between passion and 
 reason. Rating breeds a dislike both of the teacher and of the 
 lesson. It has to be remembered that beating, as such, does 
 no real good. It is the shame and disgrace of it that are 
 moral in their effects. And if these be not found, the beating 
 soon loses its terror. 
 
 Generally, Locke's doctrine of punishment is this, that every 
 motive to do right, including attention to work, should be 
 exhausted by the master and parent before beating is resorted 
 to. The child should even be reasoned with, not on broad 
 general grounds, but with such reasonings as are suited to his 
 age. He deprecates beating for intellectual defects or for idle- 
 ness or want of attention to study, until these are so often 
 repeated as to show perverseness and deliberateness of dis- 
 obedience. They then become moral faults, nay the supreme 
 moral fault the fault of .disregard of authority; and for this, 
 in accordance with the principles already laid down, he would 
 flog soundly. 
 
 He guards parents, however, from elevating trifles into 
 serious offences. ( 80, p. 59.) "Inadvertency, carelessness, 
 and gaiety" in the child, account for much. "Nor is 
 that to be hastily interpreted obstinacy or wilfulness which is 
 the natural product of their age or temper." " With a gentle 
 hand the faults natural to childhood should be set right as 
 time and age permit." " Nor is relapse into minor faults to be 
 construed into wilfulness." 
 
 At the same time if there be unmistakable wilfulness 
 amounting to obstinacy and rebellion, beating must be resorted 
 to, and then it should be so severe as not to need repetition. 
 An obstinately disobedient child must be bent. Locke tells 
 us of a mother, who, receiving her child home from nurse 
 and finding her peevish and disobedient, beat her for seven 
 
 132
 
 196 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 successive mornings without effect, and succeeded in bending 
 her only on the eighth. He applauds her for her perseverance. 
 His approbation of the monstrous conduct of this woman reveals 
 the weakness of Locke's position. By such pitting of the adult 
 will against the child's will we abuse our strength. If we 
 succeed, it is only an apparent success : that is to say, the 
 boy yields externally, but is full of passionate hate towards 
 his master a hate which carries its demoralization into 
 every corner of his being. Or he is, when we think him 
 bent, in truth broken in spirit, and all manhood and inner 
 moral growth, which must be free to be true, rendered 
 impossible a melancholy result. Nor is this all, for in 
 such contests the adult is simply pitting his obstinacy against 
 the child's and so strengthening the latter by exercise and 
 example. Another illustration of the weakness of Locke's 
 position is his recommendation that when a child cries under a 
 beating he should be beaten more if he does not stop crying 
 a wholly unnatural proceeding. He assumes that this continued 
 crying indicates continued perversity and rebellion, which it 
 by no means does. The continued crying is generally nervous 
 and automatic. Again, he would beat till a child said he was 
 sorry for his fault. Now neither child nor man can be expected 
 at a moment when their passions are roused to admit their 
 fault (save hypocritically). This is to expect passion and 
 calmness of mind to coexist, which is impossible. Give the 
 beating, I should say, if it must be given, and have done with it. 
 I am not prepared to say that we must never beat; but, 
 assuredly, beating should be always merely a vehicle for 
 conveying the disapprobation with which we regard the boy's 
 conduct; it, in truth, should be merely an emphatic way 
 of saying, " You are behaving badly and all the world would 
 think so." By means of a beating, a boy, who persists in 
 a perverse wrong-doing without ever realizing its badness, 
 may have its badness and the shame of it carried home to 
 him in a way which nothing else can do.
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 197 
 
 In cases of obstinacy, I should say, always give an alter- 
 native. Never push the contest to an extreme. "If you don't 
 do this, then you must do that, or lose such or such a pleasure." 
 Thus avoid a pitched battle. For by such battles you do one 
 of two things certainly -either break the boy or confirm his 
 obstinacy which is roused to passionateness and increased 
 persistency. Another course with very young children is to 
 shunt them. One engine advancing against another brings 
 about damage to both when the collision takes place, and, 
 probably, complete destruction to one. Run to the points and 
 shunt one of them into a siding, and you are safe. In like 
 manner, distract the perversely obstinate child by presenting 
 some new object or idea. When the fit is over, you may 
 calmly remonstrate, and with effect. 
 
 Locke, while requiring that the parent, and consequently 
 the master, shall establish his authority so as to be regarded 
 with awe by his pupils, urges strongly (as we have seen) that 
 this relationship, once established, shall be gradually relaxed, 
 and that, as the boy grows older, there should be a growing 
 equality and familiarity of treatment. In this way the pupil will 
 grow up to regard the master or the parent as his best friend, he 
 says. Yes, truly his best friend in a sense : but it seems to 
 me that there can never be in such cases the equality of all true 
 friendship between father and son. The father will remain 
 " a governor " till the end, though " not a bad sort of fellow." 
 
 (c) Rnvards. 
 
 52, p. 31. "Beating then and all other sorts of 
 slavish and corporal punishments are not the discipline fit 
 to be used in the education of those we should have wise, 
 good, and ingenuous men : and therefore very rarely to be 
 applied, and that only in great occasions and in cases of 
 extremity. On the other hand to flatter children by rewards 
 of things that are pleasant to them is as carefully to be 
 avoided." "Esteem and disgrace" are the proper instruments
 
 198 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 of discipline. But you must inspire them with a love of the 
 one and fear of the other if they are to operate. This is 
 certainly difficult, but it is the secret of education. The parents 
 must caress and commend when their children do well, and 
 show a cold exterior when they do ill. 
 
 The remaining remarks of Locke may be summed up as 
 follows : To make the sense of esteem and disgrace sink 
 deeper they should be followed with agreeable and disagreeable 
 things respectively not as rewards but as the necessary 
 consequences of this or that kind of action. They thus 
 associate well-doing with the attainment of desires and vice 
 versa. In this way they will be gradually shamed out of their 
 faults and in love with all the ways of virtue. 
 
 Beating or chiding have only the effect of causing annoy- 
 ance, with the miscarriage that brought it on them, whereas 
 if their pain be not regret for having done amiss the beating 
 will have no true effect. It only patches up and skins over a 
 sore, but does not reach to the bottom. Ingenuous shame 
 and the apprehensions of displeasure are the only true restraint. 
 
 This love of good reputation is not (it is true) the real 
 principle and measure of virtue (for that is the knowledge of 
 duty and the desire to please God), yet it is that which comes 
 nearest to it, and is therefore the proper guide and encourage- 
 ment of children. The rebukes and chidings which the faults of 
 children sometimes make necessary should not only be in 
 sober, grave, and impassionate words but also alone and in 
 private ; but the commendations they deserve should be in the 
 presence of others. 
 
 To conclude ; if a right course be taken with children there 
 will not be so much need of the application of the common 
 rewards and punishments as we imagine. All their innocent 
 folly, playing and childish actions are to be left free and 
 unrestrained as far as they consist with due respect to those 
 present, and that with the greatest allowance. These faults 
 should be left to years to cure. If we reprove too much for
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 199 
 
 small things, we make correction in more serious cases of less 
 avail. A gamesome humour should be rather encouraged, the 
 authority of parents being however so established that a look 
 or word will suffice to quiet them. 
 
 Rules. In connexion with moral discipline generally Locke 
 speaks of Rules and says, 
 
 "Avoid heaping up rules. Few years require few rules." 
 If there are too many it is simply impossible for the nature of 
 children to remember them all always and also for you always 
 to punish the infringement. Thus your rules fall into contempt 
 and the important and unimportant are confounded. Especially 
 in the matter of manners, these are best learned by example 
 and commendation when things are rightly done rather than 
 by rules. Rules, I may here add, should not be laid down 
 before offences, but should arise out of offences. 
 
 (4) Substance and Method of Moral Training. 
 
 Dealing, as Locke does, with the moral upbringing of youth 
 and giving prominence to that, he first by way of introduction 
 considers the comparative advantages of a private and public 
 education. He considers that " the breeding of a young man 
 at home in his father's house and under a good governor is 
 much the best and safest way to the great and main end of 
 Education." He considers that the roughness, trickery, rude- 
 ness, sometimes called " spirit," acquired among a company of 
 boys drawn from homes of very varying kind, are, so far from 
 being an advantage, a positive evil. There are faults no doubt 
 in a domestic education, but these are of a kind which can easily 
 be cured. Shamefacedness and absence of that modest con- 
 fidence which are characteristics of good breeding can easily 
 be guarded against by accustoming a boy to his father's society 
 and to free intercourse with his visitors. In any case ( 70)
 
 200 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 " Virtue is harder to be got than a knowledge of the world : 
 and if lost in a young man is seldom recovered." In a 
 school, even a well-disposed and competent master cannot 
 have the requisite opportunities for forming the minds and 
 manners of his pupils, which require constant attention and 
 "particular application to every single boy." The "waggeries 
 and cheats " etc. practised among schoolboys will not make a 
 thriving man. "He that lays the foundation of his son's fortune 
 on virtue and good breeding takes the only sure and warrantable 
 way." The restraint of discipline it is which makes a great 
 nation. 
 
 7> P- 5- " It i s virtue, direct virtue which is the hard 
 and valuable part to be aimed at in education and not a forward 
 pertness or any little arts of shifting. All other considerations 
 and accomplishments should give way and be postponed to this. 
 This is the solid and substantial good, which tutors should not 
 only read lectures and talk of, but the labour and art of 
 education should furnish the mind with, fasten there, and 
 never cease, till the young man had a true relish for it and 
 placed his strength, his glory and his pleasure in it." 
 
 (Note here that Locke contrasts Domestic Education with 
 Public Education in the English sense. The Scottish and 
 German system would be in his view the next best ; in fact 
 the best, if we consider that Locke's system, even if the best 
 theoretically, is impracticable for all save a few wealthy. \Ve 
 have only to introduce morality as a conscious end and object 
 into our public day schools to have as perfect a system as the 
 conditions of life admit of.) 
 
 Virtue, then, by which is here meant the subjection of our 
 inclinations to duty, is the main thing. How is this to be taught ? 
 According to Locke almost wholly by training : not by instruc- 
 tion. 
 
 The great governing rule of Method here is, that you 
 yourself afford in your own person an example of virtue. 
 
 7 1, p. 5 1. " Maxima debetur pueris reverentia." You must
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 2OI 
 
 do nothing before them which you would not have them imitate 
 nothing which you would regard as a fault in your pupil. 
 
 But virtue is a general term, and we must be watchful of our 
 pupils so that vices as they arise may be checked and tendencies 
 to virtue encouraged. If we would detect these incipient vices 
 we should watch children at play when they fancy themselves 
 unnoticed. 
 
 Locke does not exhaust the various vices and virtues, nor 
 does he follow any intelligible order in discussing them, as 
 might have been expected from the author of the Essay on the 
 Human Understanding. He seems very much to take them 
 up as they occur to him, and deals with their superficial aspect 
 only ; but in spite of this, there are few books better suited to 
 form an elementary manual of morals and manners than the 
 sections in Locke's treatise which deal with the various 
 moralities, or rather immoralities. I shall take up only a few 
 of those which Locke deals with, as a specimen of his way of 
 looking at moral training. 
 
 ( i ) Love of Power. 
 
 When watching children at play we shall see that special 
 development of selfishness which we call Love of Power. 
 This must be curbed, because it is the root of almost all 
 injustice and contention and if we do not restrain it we cannot 
 lay the " foundations of a good and worthy man." To check 
 this vice Locke proposes that "children ( 107) should never 
 have what their inclinations lead them to ask for, unless it be 
 the satisfaction of their actual needs. They should be trained 
 so that they would not dare to express their desires when these 
 were mere fancies, and the parent should as occasion served 
 reward them for their general restraint and self-denial by 
 indulgence." 
 
 Locke here, it seems to me, advocates an unnatural and 
 irrational system, as I have previously pointed out. If a child
 
 202 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 desires a box of sweetmeats or a cricket-ball or a pair of skates, 
 why should he not desire them ? And if he desire them why 
 should he not express his desire to his parents or master? 
 Locke's system, in fact, introduces a forced and artificial 
 relation between parents and children, out of which love and 
 sympathy and that mutual confidence which is the source of all 
 true moral influence over the young cannot possibly grow. If 
 we lose this, what have we gained ? Nothing. Moreover, the 
 suggestion is based on an inadequate moral analysis. Children 
 are just like ourselves. \Ve desire many things which we cannot 
 get : there is nothing wrong in desiring them, or in expressing 
 our desires. The wrong consists in not sacrificing our desires 
 to higher considerations. So with children : let Johnny have his 
 box of sweetmeats by all means, if there is no higher considera- 
 tion forbidding it. If there be; e.g. if his having them prevents 
 his brothers or sisters having what is necessary for them ; or 
 if it be a purely selfish desire, he intending to eat them all 
 himself; or if it be a question between spending the money in 
 gratifying this desire or in relieving the hunger of some poor 
 destitute child, put these motives before him and get him 
 himself to crucify his love of sweetmeats for the sake of these 
 higher things. A child well brought up will do so. It is 
 the supplying of the higher motives wherewith to suppress 
 the lower that moral training consists in. The mere law or 
 command of a superior is to be resorted to only if moral 
 motives fail. And even then, not by way of defeating the 
 child's desire, but with a view to impress him with your 
 conviction of its unworthiness. How can you do this at all, 
 if you refuse satisfaction on every side indiscriminately, thus 
 substituting your ipse dixit for the true spirit of morality ? 
 
 Locke is, I think, more successful in suggesting the true way 
 of combating selfishness and love of power when he speaks of 
 the virtues of liberality and justice.
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 203 
 
 (2) Liberality. 
 
 Encourage children to be kind and generous to each other, 
 and let them see that the esteem and commendation of others 
 always attend the exercise of generosity. 
 
 (3) Justice. 
 
 no, p. 90. "Great care is to be taken that children 
 transgress not the rules of justice, and whenever they do, they 
 should be set right, and if there be occasion for it severely re- 
 buked." Through ignorance, children are "apt to deviate from 
 just measures of right and wrong, and, consequently, even the 
 least slip in this great social virtue should be taken notice of 
 and rectified." Wonder and abhorrence should be expressed 
 at any unjust act, and the foundations of justice laid in the 
 practice of liberality. As they grow in years they will under- 
 stand better what justice means, and if then or indeed at any 
 time an act of injustice proceeds not from mistake but per- 
 verseness, and gentle rebukes fail, " rougher remedies " must be 
 resorted to. For example, the father or tutor may keep forcibly 
 from them something they think their own, and so show how 
 little advantage they are likely to gain by appropriating unjustly 
 what is another's so long as there are people stronger than they. 
 But the best way is when they are yet young to implant in them 
 an ingenuous detestation of all injustice. 
 
 (4) Cowardice and Fortitude. 
 
 Again, in speaking of the moral fault of cowardice, and the 
 virtue of fortitude, Locke suggests the hardening of children 
 to blows and making light of their pains lest we soften them too 
 much. Nay we are sometimes to subject them to pain with 
 a view to hardening. This strikes us as unsound. There 
 are pains enough without inventing them. And again it is 
 unnatural, because a child should express its suffering and be 
 sympathised with within limits, so long as the expression is not
 
 204 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 excessive. It is the excess which is wrong. If I knock my 
 knuckles against a door I probably utter some impatient word, 
 and I confess I think none the worse of myself for doing so. 
 I should be ashamed, however, of myself if I gave any sign 
 of pain even when I burnt my finger if there were sufficient 
 reason for concealing my suffering. So with children. Let 
 us be reasonable and not exaggerate acts which in themselves 
 are truly of little importance, of great importance only when 
 higher considerations enter. By just and rational treatment we 
 shall, nay we cannot but, form the highest character. Artificial 
 pretences are out of place. 
 
 (5) Cruelty. 
 
 On the subject of cruelty, Locke thinks that the tendency 
 which many children have to inflict pain on the lower animals 
 should be carefully watched, and in connexion with this he 
 animadverts strongly on the manners of wealthy children 
 towards servants. 
 
 (6) Sauntering or Idleness. 
 
 First make sure whether it be at his lessons only that the 
 boy is idle. If he is active in other things there is hope of 
 him, and by counsel or severe measures you may get him to 
 reform. 
 
 If, however, the idleness be constitutional the case is more 
 difficult. The only remark of Locke's of any value with respect 
 to such cases is to watch the boy and see whether he has a 
 liking for any one thing and encourage this. For the main 
 object is to get him to overcome the constitutional tendency, by- 
 getting him to work at something, be it what it may beetle- 
 collecting or carpentering, if not Latin or French. 
 
 The above question naturally suggests again to Locke's 
 mind the question of compulsion, and he finds the means of
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 2O5 
 
 getting children to attend to lessons by making their play a 
 task. Order a boy to whip his top and not to stop for a 
 certain time, and the boy will at once get disgusted with the 
 amusement and gladly accept his reading or writing, as a 
 change. Whatever elder people choose to make a reward or a 
 task can be made so. 
 
 Playthings. As to playthings : let the children have very 
 few, and invent what more they want for themselves. Nothing 
 is more hurtful than an excessive abundance of toys. It tends 
 to create luxurious habits and immoderate desires. 
 
 (7) Lying. 
 
 131. "Lying is so ready and cheap a cover for any mis- 
 carriage and so much in fashion among all sorts of people that a 
 child can hardly avoid observing the use which is made of it on 
 all occasions, and so can scarce be kept without great care from 
 getting into it. But it is so ill a quality and the mother of so 
 many ill ones that spawn from it and take shelter under it, that 
 a child should be brought up in the greatest horror of it imagin- 
 able." The first lie, he thinks, should be treated with surprise and 
 astonishment that such a thing should be possible. The second 
 with coldness and displeasure of all about him. If this fail, 
 the lying may be held to be deliberate and therefore a sign of 
 obstinacy. In accordance with his fundamental idea, beating 
 must now be resorted to. When children commit faults they 
 will "like the rest of the sons of Adam be apt to make 
 excuses." This borders on untruth and they must be urged to 
 be ingenuous. But when they confess ingenuously they must 
 be commended for this, and not punished for the fault which 
 they have confessed. And this condonation of the fault should 
 be thorough ; no allusion should afterwards be made to it. 
 If sometimes there be a few slips in truth do not be too ready 
 to take notice of them, lest the boy should feel that he has 
 lost his reputation with you, than which nothing can be more
 
 206 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 
 
 hurtful. When you have once detected him in a lie you must 
 be most vigilant and severe. 
 
 (8) Truth and Good Nature. 
 
 Having laid the foundations of virtue in a true knowledge 
 of God, the next thing is to keep him exactly to speaking the 
 truth and to cultivate his "good nature." By this Locke 
 means his benevolence, for as he truly remarks "injustice 
 generally springs from too great love of ourselves and too little 
 of others." 
 
 (9) Wisdom. 
 
 Wisdom is the managing of one's affairs ably and with 
 foresight in this world. It has however a moral side. In its 
 full sense it can only be learned from experience and observa- 
 tion, but we can at least guard the young, with a view to 
 wisdom, against that "ape of wisdom" cunning, resorted to by 
 those who cannot gain their ends by direct ways. Accustom 
 them in truth and sincerity to a submission to reason, and 
 as much as may be to reflection on their actions. 
 
 ( i o) Good-breeding. 
 
 On the subject of good-breeding Locke has some good 
 observations. He speaks at length and with such wisdom and 
 knowledge of the world that I would recommend teachers to 
 read what he says. Indeed it is to young men and women 
 alone that his remarks can be serviceable. In the case of 
 mere boys, I think we have only to cultivate good-nature and 
 a moderate estimate of themselves. The rest will come from 
 the experience of life, and above all from the society they 
 keep : for as Locke truly says, " the tincture of company sinks 
 deeper than the outside." The breaches of good breeding 
 he says may be all avoided by observing this one rule, " Not 
 to think meanly of ourselves and not to think meanly of 
 others."
 
 JOHN LOCKE, THE ENGLISH RATIONALIST 2O/ 
 
 ( 1 1 ) Religion. 
 
 Religion being (136) "the foundation of all virtue, there 
 ought very early to be imprinted on a child's mind a true 
 notion of God as of the independent Supreme Being, Author 
 and Maker of all things, from Whom we receive all our good, 
 Who loves us and gives us all things " : but this without any 
 attempt to enter into the subtler questions of Deity. Simple 
 prayer, night and morning, should be practised.
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 
 JOHN LOCKE continued. 
 
 Knowledge or Learning, (a) Method, (d) Materials, 
 (c) The Recreative, (d) Qualification of the Teacher. 
 
 LOCKE is a utilitarian in this sense that he holds that a boy 
 should learn what will be useful to him as a man in intercourse 
 with his fellows and in the conduct of ordinary affairs. He is also 
 cyclopaedic, because he advocates the learning of the elements 
 of many things. In both these respects Locke is in accord 
 with almost every thinker in these days. It is only a gradually 
 decreasing number of secondary schoolmasters who differ from 
 him. Were it not however for the argument of the treatise 
 on the Conduct of the Understanding we should quarrel with 
 him as to his restricted use of the term "useful." Next to 
 moral principles and a religious habit of mind, nothing surely 
 is so " useful " to a man as a vigorous and sound judgment. 
 The materials and methods of instruction have to be con- 
 sidered in view of this supreme end what Locke himself 
 would call Wisdom. The great merit of Locke is that he 
 denounced the rigid classicism of his time which led to 
 instruction exclusively in the instruments of knowledge and 
 of thought not in knowledge and thought themselves. As 
 regards materials of instruction Locke was a Realist as opposed 
 to the Formalists, but this does not mean that he was a
 
 JOHN LOCKE 209 
 
 naturalistic realist. At the same time, it must be admitted that 
 he had, like Comenius, the conspicuous defect that he was 
 unable to comprehend the education which was to be found in 
 literary expression and was not alive to the intellectual dis- 
 cipline which grammatical studies yield. 
 
 (a) Method. As regards method in instructing, Locke 
 makes many pertinent remarks, but it had never occurred to 
 him, though a philosopher, that method had a scientific basis 
 in psychology. He dealt with the whole subject in a somewhat 
 light, but by no means perfunctory, spirit. He considers that 
 good methods may be easily found, and that as children natur- 
 ally love knowledge, the task of instruction should not be so 
 very difficult. " Knowledge," he says, "is grateful to the under- 
 standing as light to the eyes." Outside the three "R's" his 
 remarks are rather directed to what ought to be the matter of 
 instruction than to the how of method, although his pages 
 are full of admirable suggestions. Knowledge may be had "at 
 a very easy rate by good methods," but he does not suggest 
 anything save what are rightly to be called wise expedients 
 rather than methods strictly so called. The most valuable 
 of his remarks to be found in the Thoughts on the 
 subject of method in general are these: (167) "Children's 
 minds are narrow and weak and usually susceptible but of 
 one thought at once. Whatever is in a child's head fills 
 it for the time, especially if set on with any passion. It 
 should, therefore, be the skill and art of the teacher to clear 
 their heads of all other thoughts while they are learning 
 of anything, the better to make room for what he would instil 
 into them, that it may be received with attention and appli- 
 cation, without which it leaves no impression. The natural 
 temper of children disposes their minds to wander. Novelty 
 alone takes them ; whatever that presents they are presently 
 eager to have a taste of and are as soon satisfied with it. 
 They quickly grow weary of the same thing, and so have 
 L. 14
 
 210 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 almost their whole delight in change and variety. It is a 
 contradiction to the natural state of childhood for them to 
 fix their fleeting thoughts." Again he says that the success 
 of instruction depends on the activity of the pupil's mind 
 relatively to the instruction given and to its attractiveness. 
 In this Locke is right. But he is wrong, I think, when 
 he says that everything must be made pleasant and attractive. 
 The object of education in so far as it is discipline is, as I 
 have already pointed out, to induce a child to put pressure 
 on himself and to initiate intellectual effort under a sense of 
 duty. This is one of the "hardships of the mind" which 
 every young person has to endure and overcome. It is moral 
 as well as intellectual in its effect. In some of his utterances 
 Locke seems to recognize this fact himself, but he certainly 
 does not take firm hold of it. The sum of the matter is that 
 the instruction should always be as pleasant and attractive as 
 it can possibly be made, and for this we rely on Method. 
 
 (b} Materials, As regards the matter of knowledge 
 Locke lets us clearly understand that this is quite secondary. 
 Virtue, wisdom, and breeding, these are the chief ends of 
 education. Other things he only "allows to be necessary." 
 We must however give an account, however brief, of this 
 portion of Locke's treatise. 
 
 Reading. The letters of the alphabet (Locke thinks) may 
 be learned as an amusement. Let them be pasted on a many 
 sided bale or on four dice, and let children amuse themselves 
 by casting these and seeing what letter is thrown. Then when 
 the letters are known let the same process be followed, the 
 players seeing after every throw who has thrown most words. 
 Thus much for learning to read. Cheat your pupil into it if 
 you can. In this way he will soon be able to read some " easy 
 pleasant book," Aesop's fables being the best, and if it has 
 pictures in it so much the better. Reynard the Fox he also 
 recommends. Learning by heart and learning to read should
 
 JOHN LOCKE 211 
 
 not be made to " clog one another," as it is essential that the 
 reading should always be associated with pleasure. The 
 Creed and Ten Commandments and Lord's Prayer for example 
 should not be learned by heart from a book, but by the oral 
 repetition of others. Locke complains of the want of pleasant 
 and suitable reading for children. He objects to the promis- 
 cuous reading of the Bible, for obvious reasons. 
 
 Writing. This is to be begun only when the pupil can read 
 English well, and first he should be taught to hold his pen 
 right, and this before he is suffered to put it to paper. Then 
 the proper placing of the paper and of his body is to be 
 attended to. He should then trace over with black ink, letters 
 lithographed in red ink. Then he may write without tracing. 
 He recommends also shorthand. 
 
 Drawing. This is recommended as a part of the education 
 of a young gentleman : but solely because of its future utility. 
 
 French and Latin. As soon as he can speak English it 
 is time for him to learn some other language. This is to be 
 talked into him, and begun early, that the organs of speech may 
 be adapted to the French pronunciation. A year or two will 
 enable a boy to speak French. 
 
 Latin. When he can speak and read French well he should 
 proceed to Latin. This should be learned in the same way, by 
 talking and reading. "Latin I look upon as absolutely necessary 
 to a gentleman." But can there be anything more absurd than 
 forcing boys to learn Latin who will never need it afterwards, 
 entering perhaps some trade? But custom is so strong that 
 even tradesmen think that their children have not an orthodox 
 education unless they learn Lilly's Grammar. 
 
 The ordinary way of learning Latin is bad. The true way 
 is by talking it into him, and thus he will learn easily what is 
 usually whipped into boys over a period of 6 or 7 years. "Our 
 knowledge [even of foreign tongues] should all begin in the 
 things of sense and not in the abstractions of Logic and 
 Metaphysics." 166, p. 140. 
 
 142
 
 212 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 If a man cannot be got who can teach your son in the way 
 suggested, the next best thing is to give him some easy book 
 with an interlinear word for word translation taking care that 
 he makes himself perfect in one lesson before he goes to 
 another. But as a preliminary it will be necessary that he 
 first get the accidence by heart. More than this of grammar 
 he need not have until he can himself read "Sanctii Minerva'." 
 
 If a boy encounters difficulties in reading Latin do not 
 trouble him to find them out, but tell him and help him on. 
 Everything is to be made as easy and pleasant as possible. 
 " Languages are to be learned by rote, custom, and memory." 
 
 The grammar of a language he admits is to be studied 
 critically, but only by professed scholars. In further considering 
 the method of teaching Latin, he says that after some facility 
 has been attained by reading the interlinear book, he may then 
 be advanced to Justin or Eutropius, helping himself with an 
 English translation. If this involves rote work what then? 
 All languages are really learned by rote and are only well known 
 when the words to express thought come readily without thought 
 and without the conscious application of grammatical rules. 
 
 Grammar is not on this account to be said to be of no use, 
 but children in grammar schools should not be perplexed with 
 it. People acquire great correctness and elegance in speaking 
 a language who know nothing about its grammar. Conversation 
 is that whereby people acquire languages. If grammar is to be 
 studied with a view to greater correctness of speech it ought to 
 be the grammar of our own tongue. At present one would 
 think that all our youths were being trained to be teachers of 
 the dead languages. 
 
 Grammar, then, should be taught to those who desire to 
 write or speak with elegance and to scholars, but only after 
 they can speak and write the tongue whose grammar they 
 study. [Note however that the accidence is to be got by 
 
 1 A treatise on Latin Grammar rather than a Latin Grammar (now 
 forgotten).
 
 JOHN LOCKE 213 
 
 heart.] Its proper place in truth is as an introduction to 
 rhetoric. The speaking and reading are all that is necessary 
 to those who merely want a gentleman's acquaintance with a 
 tongue: the critical knowledge is for those who have to write it 
 with exactness. In any case there is no doubt in Locke's mind 
 that those are tormented about grammar to whom it does not 
 at all belong, " I mean children at the age wherein they are 
 generally perplexed with it in grammar schools." 168, 
 pp. 145, 146. 
 
 He can scarcely find words strong enough to express his 
 contempt for Latin in those schools that prepare for ordinary 
 middle-class life. Latin is necessary to a "gentleman"; at least 
 it was so in Locke's time, but the argument of utility, in the 
 vulgar sense of that word, breaks down when we consider its 
 employment as an instrument of education in the schools of 
 the bourgeoisie. 
 
 Let the scholar translate Latin into English, but as the mere 
 learning of words is a very unpleasant business let him "join 
 as much real knowledge with it as he can," beginning still with 
 that which lies most obvious to the senses, such as is the 
 knowledge of minerals, plants, and animals, and particularly 
 timber and fruit trees * * " more especially geography, 
 astronomy, and anatomy." ( 169.) [Here we see the influence 
 of Milton.] But whatever he is taught let virtue be the 
 chief end. 
 
 Spite of all that has been said, a boy if he has to go to 
 school must submit to the usual routine, but by all means try 
 to get him exempt from writing Latin themes and, above all, 
 verses. As to themes, Locke considers it an Egyptian tyranny 
 to ask boys to write themes when they have not, by reason of 
 their age and ignorance, the materials. He suggests their 
 being induced to speak to a subject which they know something 
 about without preparation. 
 
 As to verses the school practice is absurd and indefensible. 
 Locke had an aversion to poetry. He says that if a boy
 
 214 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 shows a poetic vein it should be stifled and suppressed, if 
 he is not to grow up to a dislike of all other "callings and 
 businesses " and to be led into frivolous company. Poetry and 
 gaming go together. And even if any one desires to cultivate 
 the poetic vein he will do it best by reading the poets 
 certainly not by writing Latin verses. 
 
 Locke further objects to learning parts of classical authors 
 by heart as tending to make a pedant, and yet he commends 
 the learning of beautiful passages, if selected for this reason, 
 that they are beautiful. As to exercising the memory, that is 
 not improved by learning by heart. The learning one class of 
 things by heart does not improve the memory for others. 
 "What the mind is intent upon and careful of that it re- 
 members best" ( 176); and if we add to this order and 
 method we have done all that can be done. Yet Locke 
 does not mean that there should be no exercise of memory. 
 Useful things and fine sayings might well be learned by heart 
 and frequently called for that they may not be forgotten. 
 
 Greek. When a youth is grown up he may acquire the 
 Greek tongue for himself if he desire it, without the aid of a 
 tutor. Greek is for a professed student and is not necessary to 
 the equipment of a gentleman. 
 
 Geography. While a child is learning French and Latin 
 he should learn things through these arithmetic, geometry, 
 geography, chronology and history. 
 
 Geography should be begun with the globe ; as the leading 
 outlines being dependent entirely on the eye will be learned 
 readily. 
 
 Arithmetic. When he has the natural parts of the globe 
 in his memory it may then be time to begin arithmetic, which 
 is the easiest and first sort of abstract reasoning that the mind 
 is accustomed to and of universal application. A man cannot 
 have too much of it. 
 
 Along with this, the globe should again be studied, 
 advancing from the terrestrial to the celestial globe. Then
 
 JOHN LOCKE 215 
 
 the planetary system should be taught to him; but always 
 begin with what is plain and simple, and settle that well in 
 the pupils' heads before proceeding further. " Give first one 
 simple idea and see that they take it right and perfectly 
 comprehend it, before you go further, and then add some other 
 simple idea which lies next in your way to what you aim at, 
 and so proceeding by gentle and insensible steps children, 
 without confusion and amazement, will have their under- 
 standings opened and their thoughts extended farther than 
 could have been expected." ( 181.)' 
 
 Geometry. The six books of Euclid should be learned in 
 the ordinary school course : but it is in the essay on the 
 Conduct of the Human Understanding, not here, that we 
 find Locke's estimate of mathematics in education. He 
 there says (Fowler's edition, section vn. p. 23) : 
 
 " I have mentioned mathematics as a way to settle in the 
 mind a habit of reasoning closely and in train ; not that I 
 think it necessary that all men should be deep mathematicians, 
 but that, having got the way of reasoning, which that study 
 necessarily brings the mind to, they might be able to transfer 
 it to other parts of knowledge, as they shall have occasion. 
 For, in all sorts of reasoning every single argument should be 
 managed as a mathematical demonstration; the connexion and 
 dependence of ideas should be followed till the mind is brought 
 to the source on which it bottoms, and observes the coherence 
 all along; though in proofs of probability one such train is not 
 enough to settle the judgment, as in demonstrative knowledge." 
 
 Chronology. A boy should have a general knowledge of the 
 great dates and epochs as preparatory, along with geography, 
 to the proper understanding of history. 
 
 History. This delights the young, and they should read 
 
 history in Latin, e.g. Eutropius, Justin and Curtius, and thus 
 
 prepare themselves for the more difficult authors. They need 
 
 not be troubled as to the period at which they begin, because 
 
 1 The teaching of Locke's philosophy is to be seen in this.
 
 2l6 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 their chronology will keep them right. As boys grow up, 
 history is an important subject as "the great mistress of 
 prudence and civil knowledge." 
 
 Ethics. This having been all along taught by practice 
 rather than by rule, nothing more is needed than what the 
 Bible, and, later, Tully's offices afford. Yet it is worthy of 
 notice here that while Locke relies mainly on the formation 
 of moral habits, he yet considers that the study of morality 
 as maxims and precepts in other words, instruction in the 
 substance of morality should enter into school-work. 
 
 Civil Law. This should be studied in Puffendorf and 
 Grotius. There he will be instructed in the natural rights 
 of men and in the foundations of Civil Society. A virtuous 
 young man who knows Latin and the Civil Law and writes a 
 good hand, may be turned out into the world with the certainty 
 that he will " find employment and esteem everywhere." Civil 
 law and history are in Locke's opinion " studies which a 
 gentleman should constantly dwell upon and never have done 
 with." 
 
 Law (Municipal}. A gentleman should not be ignorant of 
 the law of his own country by studying the ancient books of 
 the Common Law, and " taking a view of our English constitu- 
 tion and Government." Then in connexion with this he 
 should read the history of his own country. 
 
 Rhetoric and Logic. These are not to be learned from 
 books of rhetoric and logic, but from the study of good 
 models and by practice. 
 
 Style. As to style, youth should be trained to write, being 
 practised first in narrative and then in epistolary composition. 
 A gentleman should labour to get facility, clearness, and 
 elegance, in expressing himself in his own tongue; and "to 
 this purpose he should be daily exercised in it." Locke is 
 bitterly satirical on the neglect of English composition in 
 schools. " To mind what English his pupil speaks or writes is 
 below the dignity of one bred up amongst Latin and Greek."
 
 JOHN LOCKE 217 
 
 Natural Philosophy. Locke thinks that the works of 
 nature " are contrived by a wisdom and speak by ways too far 
 surpassing our faculties to discover or capacities to conceive, 
 for us ever to be able to reduce them into a science ! " 
 
 There are two parts of Natural Science that which has to 
 do with Spirit and that which has to do with Body. The study 
 of Spirit or Spirits ought to precede that of Body, not as a 
 science but as an enlargement of mind " towards a fuller com- 
 prehension of the intellectual world to which we are led both 
 by Reason and Revelation" ( 190). He thinks the best 
 way of doing this would be the perusal of Bible history, 
 in a book written for the young. This is all the more 
 necessary " because matter being a thing that all our senses are 
 constantly conversant with, it is so apt to possess the mind and 
 exclude all other beings but matter, that prejudice grounded 
 on such principles often leaves no room for the admittance of 
 spirits or the allowing any such thing as immaterial beings in 
 rerutn natura ; when yet it is evident that by mere matter and 
 motion none of the great phenomena of nature can be resolved : 
 to instance but that common one of gravity, which I think 
 impossible to be explained by any natural operation of matter 
 or any other law of motion but the positive will of a superior 
 Being so ordering it." ( 192.)' The world, he says, is full 
 of systems of Natural Philosophy, but as there is no true or 
 certain science I conclude that none of them are to be read, 
 though a gentleman may look into some of them to fit himself 
 for conversation. Yet Locke adds laudation of the "incom- 
 parable Mr Newton's " application of Mathematics to Natural 
 Philosophy. 
 
 Locke evidently means that too much occupation with the 
 things of sense has a tendency to extrude moral and spiritual 
 ideas from the mind of youth. This is much better put in 
 
 1 Locke tries to explain the Noachian Deluge by the alteration of the 
 centre of the earth's gravity by the will of God.
 
 218 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 the Conduct of the Human Understanding (Fowler's edition, 
 section ix.), where he says, "Outward corporeal objects, that 
 constantly importune our senses and captivate our appetites, 
 fail not to fill our heads with lively and lasting ideas of 
 that kind. Here the mind needs not to be set upon getting 
 greater store; they offer themselves fast enough, and are 
 usually entertained in such plenty, and lodged so carefully, 
 that the mind wants room or attention for others that it has 
 more use and need of. To fit the understanding therefore for 
 such reasoning as I have been above speaking of, care should 
 be taken to fill it with moral and more abstract ideas ; for 
 these not offering themselves to the senses, but being to be 
 framed to the understanding, people are generally so neglectful 
 of a faculty they are apt to think wants nothing, that I fear 
 most men's minds are more unfurnished with such ideas than 
 is imagined. They often use the words, and how can they be 
 suspected to want the ideas?" 
 
 We may fitly conclude Locke's views of the subjects and 
 methods of instruction with his own words, "The tutor should 
 remember that his business is not so much to teach his pupil 
 all that is knowable as to raise in him a love and esteem of 
 knowledge, and to put him in a right way of knowing and 
 improving himself when he has a mind to it." 195, p. 171. 
 
 (c) The Recreative. When we reflect that Locke was a 
 physician and recall his remarks about the importance of 
 having a body which would be a willing servant of the mind, 
 his almost total omission of all that comes under the head of 
 Gymnastic is strange. In Gymnastic in the form of games, 
 apart from its influence on the body, there is also a species of 
 moral training of great value which ought to have commended 
 the subject to him. Nay in public schools it is often the 
 chief moral training which those boys receive who are inapt to 
 learn. When Locke speaks of bodily exercises he has in view 
 only those exercises which make an accomplished gentleman
 
 JOHN LOCKE 219 
 
 and contribute to an easy bearing in society and to the en- 
 joyment of life. 
 
 Dancing for example is to be taught because it gives an 
 easy and graceful motion to the body and " manliness." 
 
 Music Locke sets little store by, but admits it as a recreation, 
 since we cannot be always at work. 
 
 Riding the " great horse " he commends as necessary to 
 gentlemen, but fencing he discourages as leading to quarrels 
 and duelling. 
 
 As to recreations in addition to the usual exercises of the 
 body, Locke recommends gardening, husbandry, and working 
 in wood. Recreation "is not being idle but easing the 
 wearied part by change of business." 
 
 Again, he says, " nothing is recreation which is not done with 
 delight." All sorts of manual occupations might be taken to, 
 e.g. varnishing, graving, cutting precious stones, etc., etc. 
 
 (d) The Qualifications oj a Teacher, and his personal re- 
 lation to his Pupil. ( 94.) " The great work of a governor is to 
 fashion the carriage and form the mind, to settle in his pupil good 
 habits and the principles of virtue and wisdom ; to give him by 
 little and little a view of mankind, and work him into a love 
 and imitation of what is excellent and praiseworthy; and in the 
 prosecution of it to give him vigour, activity, and industry. 
 The studies which he sets him upon are but as it were the 
 exercises of his faculties and employment of his time, to keep 
 him from sauntering and idleness, to teach him application and 
 accustom him to take pains, and to give him some little taste 
 of what his own industry must perfect. For who expects that 
 under a tutor a young gentleman should be an accomplished 
 critic, orator, or logician ; go to the bottom of metaphysics, 
 natural philosophy or mathematics, or be a master in history 
 or chronology ? though something of each of these is to be 
 taught him ; but it is only to open the door, that he may look 
 in, and as it were begin an acquaintance, but not to dwell there ;
 
 220 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 and a governor would be much blamed that should keep his 
 pupil too long and lead him too far in most of them. But of 
 good breeding, knowledge of the world, virtue, industry and a 
 love of reputation he cannot have too much ; and if he have 
 these he will not long want what he needs or desires of the 
 other. And since it cannot be hoped he should have time and 
 strength to learn all things, most pains should be taken about 
 that which is most necessary, and that principally looked after 
 which will be of most and frequentest use to him in the world." 
 In teaching, he says, try to dispose the mind of your pupil 
 to his work, but remember the instability of children's minds 
 and be easy with them. To rate and chide and punish is to 
 instil a hatred of the lesson hour, and moreover it confuses the 
 child's mind, so that he does not know what he is doing or 
 what you are saying to him. ( 167.) "It is as impossible 
 to draw fair and regular characters on a trembling mind as 
 on a shaking paper. The great skill of a teacher is to get 
 and keep the attention of his scholar; whilst he has that he 
 is sure to advance as fast as the learner's abilities will carry 
 him ; and without that, all his bustle and pother will be to 
 little or no purpose. To attain this he should make the child 
 comprehend (as much as may be) the usefulness of what he 
 teaches him and let him see by what he has learnt that he can 
 do something which he could not before. To this he should 
 add sweetness in all his instructions and by a certain tender- 
 ness in his whole carriage make the child sensible that he 
 loves him and designs nothing but his good, the only way 
 to beget love in the child which will make him hearken to 
 his lessons and relish what he teaches him. Nothing but 
 obstinacy should meet with any imperiousness or rough 
 usage. All other faults should be corrected with a gentle 
 hand, and kind engaging words will work better and more 
 effectually upon a willing mind, and even prevent a good deal 
 of that perverseness which rough and imperious usage often 
 produces in well-disposed and generous minds. It is true,
 
 JOHN LOCKE 221 
 
 obstinacy and wilful neglect must be mastered even if it cost 
 blows to do it : but I am apt to think perverseness in the 
 pupils is often the effect of frowardness in the tutor ; and that 
 most children would seldom have deserved blows, if needless 
 and misapplied roughness had not taught them ill nature and 
 given them an aversion for their teacher and all that comes from 
 him. Inadvertency, forgetfulness, unsteadiness and wandering 
 of thought are the natural faults of childhood, and, therefore, 
 when they are not observed to be wilful, are to be mentioned 
 softly and gained upon by time." 
 
 He concludes his treatise by stating that he has made no 
 pretension to write a full and "just" tractate, but only to 
 record some general views " regarding the main end and aims 
 of education, and these designed for a gentleman's son," and he 
 commends them to those who " dare venture to consult their 
 own reason in the education of their children rather than rely 
 wholly upon old custom."
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 JOHN LOCKE concluded. 
 
 Conduct of the Understanding. Method and Intellectual 
 Discipline : Words : Judgments : Reasonings. 
 
 LOCKE'S method in the department of instruction is not so 
 much a method in any philosophic acceptation of the term as 
 a collection of empirical rules and hints as to the easiest way of 
 disposing of the difficulty of getting the work of mere learning 
 well over. One might rightly conclude that Locke had never 
 fairly faced the question of the discipline of intelligence as 
 opposed to mere instruction, were it not for the Conduct of 
 the Understanding the last of his writings. In this book 
 the training and discipline of the intelligence is the theme, 
 and while treating of this, many sound rules of general method 
 are given and vividly illustrated. This essay, as Hallam truly 
 says, is a " treatise on the moral discipline of the intellect." I 
 shall first give a few extracts bearing on method generally and 
 then on discipline of the intellect.
 
 JOHN LOCKE 223 
 
 (i) Method generally Step by Step Little by Little- 
 Predisposing the mind of the Pupil Labour. 
 
 i. The analytic method. ( xxxix.) 1 
 
 "Things that in a remote and confused view seem very 
 obscure must be approached by gentle and regular steps ; and 
 what is most visible, easy, and obvious in them, first considered. 
 Reduce them into their distinct parts ; and then in their due 
 order bring all that should be known concerning every one of 
 these parts into plain and simple questions ; and then what 
 was thought obscure, perplexed and too hard for our weak 
 parts, will lay itself open to the understanding in a fair view, 
 and let the mind into that which before it was awed with, and 
 kept at a distance from as wholly mysterious." 
 
 2. Step by step: graduation of studies. ( xxxix.) 
 
 "The surest way for a learner in this, as in all other cases, 
 is not to advance by jumps and large strides ; let that which 
 he sets himself to learn next be indeed the next ; i.e. as nearly 
 conjoined with what he knows already as is possible ; let it be 
 distinct but not remote from it : let it be new, and what he did 
 not know before, that the understanding may advance ; but let 
 it be as little at once as may be, that its advances may be clear 
 and sure. All the ground that it gets this way it will hold. 
 This distinct, gradual growth in knowledge is firm and sure ; it 
 carries its own light with it in every step of its progression in 
 an easy and orderly train ; than which there is nothing of 
 more use to the understanding. And though this perhaps may 
 seem a very slow and lingering way to knowledge, yet I dare 
 confidently affirm that whoever will try it in himself or any one 
 he will teach, shall find the advances greater in this method 
 than they would in the same space of time have been in any 
 other he could have taken." 
 
 1 Fowler's edition.
 
 224 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 3. Little by little. The new out of the old. ( xxxix.) 
 
 " I therefore take the liberty to repeat here again what 
 I have said elsewhere, that in learning anything, as little should 
 be proposed to the mind at once as is possible ; and, that being 
 understood and fully mastered, to proceed to the next adjoining 
 part yet unknown, simple, unperplexed proposition belonging 
 to the matter in hand, and tending to the clearing what is 
 principally designed." 
 
 4. Predisposing the mind of the Pupil and co-operation 
 
 of the Teacher. ( xxx.) 
 
 " He that will observe children will find that even when 
 they endeavour their utmost, they cannot keep their minds 
 from straggling. The way to cure it I am satisfied is not angry 
 chiding or beating, for that presently fills their heads with all 
 the ideas that fear, dread, or confusion can offer to them. To 
 bring back gently their wandering thoughts by leading them 
 into the path and going before them in the train they should 
 pursue without any rebuke or so much as taking notice (where 
 it can be avoided) of their roving, would I suppose sooner 
 reconcile and inure them to attention than all those rougher 
 methods, which more distract their thought and, hindering the 
 application they would promote, introduce a contrary habit." 
 
 5. Labour necessary. ( xxxvni.) 
 
 In his Thoughts Locke would have everything, as we 
 found, made easy for the young learner, but in the Conduct of 
 the Understanding he says, 
 
 " We are born ignorant of everything. The superficies of 
 things that surround them make impressions on the negligent, 
 but nobody penetrates into the inside without labour, attention, 
 and industry. Stones and timber grow of themselves, but yet 
 there is no uniform pile with symmetry and convenience to
 
 JOHN LOCKE 225 
 
 lodge in, without toil and pains. God has made the intellectual 
 world harmonious and beautiful without us ; but it will never 
 come into our heads all at once ; we must bring it home piece- 
 meal, and there set it up by our own industry, or else we shall 
 have nothing but darkness and a chaos within, whatever order 
 and light there be in things without us." 
 
 (2) Discipline of the Intellect. 
 
 I do not suppose anyone would be disposed to quarrel 
 with the substance of Locke's views on moral training and 
 discipline, nor yet in these days at least with his advocacy of a 
 wide range of study, for boys, so long as the range was not so 
 wide as to dissipate all the powers and train none. But I 
 imagine all men who have thought about educational principles 
 and aims must concur in feeling that instruction given on 
 Locke's plan as contained in the Thoughts, would fail to give 
 discipline or power to the intelligence. This would not be a 
 matter to grieve over were it not that we cannot separate the 
 intellectual and moral nature, and that the discipline of the 
 intellect is a discipline of the will, and indirectly a training 
 to virtue. 
 
 In the Conduct of the Human Understanding, however, we 
 find the necessary supplement to the Thoughts on this point 
 as on others, for it is in fact a treatise on mental Discipline : 
 and it is to this valuable essay that we must go, if we 
 wish to know what Locke's idea was of the proper aim of 
 education as regards the intellect. He there shows what a 
 sound intellect and habit of mind are and what an unsound. 
 His characteristics of the former constitute his educational 
 ideal as regards intellect, his remarks on the latter point out 
 what we have to guard against and correct both in ourselves 
 and in those we educate. 
 
 L. I 5
 
 226 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 Words and Judgments. 
 
 Discipline is to be obtained by the analysis of words as the 
 vehicles of things, the analysis and reconstruction in our own 
 minds of the reasonings which we encounter in literature and 
 by the exercise of our own reason. On these points let us see 
 what Locke says. 
 
 Analysis of Words. ( xv.) 
 
 " The sure and only way to get true knowledge is to form 
 in our minds clear settled notions of things, with names 
 annexed to those determined ideas. These we are to consider 
 and with their several relations and habitudes, and not amuse 
 ourselves with floating names, and words of indetermined signi- 
 fication, which we can use in several senses to serve a turn." 
 
 Again he says (Fowler's edition, xxix.): 
 
 " I have copiously enough spoken of the abuse of words in 
 another place 1 , and therefore shall upon this reflection that the 
 sciences are full of them, warn those that would conduct their 
 understandings right, not to take any term howsoever authorised 
 by the language of the schools, to stand for anything till they 
 have an idea of it. A word may be of frequent use, and 
 great credit, with several authors, and be by them made use of 
 as if it stood for some real being; but yet, if he that reads 
 cannot frame any distinct idea of that being, it is certainly to 
 him a mere empty sound without a meaning ; and he learns no 
 more by all that is said of it, or attributed to it, than if it were 
 affirmed only of that bare empty sound. They who would 
 advance in knowledge and not deceive and swell themselves 
 with a little articulated air, should lay down this as a funda- 
 mental rule not to take words for things, nor suppose that 
 names in books signify real entities in nature till they can 
 frame clear and distinct ideas of those entities." 
 
 1 In the Essay on the Human Understanding.
 
 JOHN LOCKE 227 
 
 Elsewhere : 
 
 " Words are not made to conceal, but to declare and show 
 something. Where they are by those who pretend to instruct, 
 otherwise used, they conceal indeed something ; but that they 
 conceal is nothing but the ignorance, error or sophistry of the 
 talker ; for there is in truth nothing else under them." 
 
 Analysis of the substance of Reading. 
 
 When he speaks of Reading and the uselessness of it 
 without analysis and thought, he has some remarks which 
 notwithstanding their length I may here quote with advantage 
 to all who read. xx. 
 
 "This is that which I think great readers are apt to be 
 mistaken in. Those who have read of everything, are thought 
 to understand everything too ; but it is not always so. Reading 
 furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is 
 thinking makes what we read ours. We are of the ruminating 
 kind, and it is not enough to cram ourselves with a great load 
 of collections ; unless we chew them over again they will not 
 give us strength and nourishment. There are indeed in some 
 writers visible instances of deep thoughts, close and acute 
 reasoning and ideas well pursued. The light these would give 
 would be of great use, if their reader would observe and imitate 
 them ; all the rest at best are but particulars fit to be turned 
 into knowledge ; but that can be done only by our own 
 meditation, and examining the reach, force, and coherence of 
 what is said ; and then, as far as we apprehend and see the con- 
 nexion of ideas, so far it is ours ; without that, it is but so 
 much loose matter floating in our brain. The memory may be 
 stored, but the judgment is little better, and the stock of 
 knowledge not increased, by being able to repeat what others 
 have said, or produce the arguments we have found in them. 
 Such a knowledge as this is but knowledge by hearsay, and 
 the ostentation of it is at best but talking by rote, and very 
 often upon weak and wrong principles. For all that is to be 
 
 152
 
 228 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 found in books is not built upon true foundations, nor always 
 rightly deduced from the principles it is pretended to be 
 built on. Such an examen as is requisite to discover that, 
 every reader's mind is not forward to make ; especially in those 
 who have given themselves up to a party, and only hunt for 
 what they can scrape together, that may favour and support 
 the tenets of it. Such men wilfully exclude themselves from 
 truth and from all true benefit to be derived by reading. 
 Others of more indifferency often want attention and industry. 
 The mind is backward in itself to be at the pains to trace 
 every argument to its original, and to see upon what basis 
 it stands and how firmly; but yet it is this that gives so much 
 the advantage to one man more than another in reading. The 
 mind should by severe rules be tied down to this, at first, 
 uneasy task; use and exercise will give it facility. So that 
 those who are accustomed to it, readily, as it were with one 
 cast of the eye take a view of the argument and presently, 
 in most cases, see where it bottoms. Those who have got this 
 faculty, one may say, have got the true key of books and 
 the clue to lead them through the mizmaze of variety of 
 opinions and authors to truth and certainty. This young 
 readers should be entered in, and showed the use of, that 
 they might profit by their reading. Those who are strangers 
 to it will be apt to think it too great a clog in the way of 
 men's studies, and they will suspect they shall make but small 
 progress, if, in the books they read, they must stand to examine 
 and unravel every argument, and follow it step by step up to 
 its original. 
 
 " I answer, this is a good objection, and ought to weigh 
 with those whose reading is designed for much talk and little 
 knowledge, and I have nothing to say to it. But I am here 
 inquiring into the conduct of the understanding in its progress 
 towards knowledge ; and to those who aim at that, I may say, 
 that he who fair and softly goes steadily forward in a course 
 that points right, will sooner be at his journey's end than he
 
 JOHN LOCKE 229 
 
 that runs after every one he meets, though he gallop all day 
 full speed. 
 
 " To which let me add, that this way of thinking on, and 
 profiting by what we read, will be a clog and rub to any one 
 only in the beginning : when custom and exercise have made 
 it familiar, it will be despatched on most occasions without 
 resting or interruption in the course of our reading. The 
 motions and views of a mind exercised that way are wonder- 
 fully quick ; and a man used to such sort of reflections sees as 
 much at one glimpse as would require a long discourse to 
 lay before another, and make out in an entire and gradual 
 deduction. Besides, that, when the first difficulties are over, 
 the delight and sensible advantage it brings mightily en- 
 courages and enlivens the mind in reading, which without this 
 is very improperly called study.'' 
 
 Reasoning and Principles. 
 
 Then when he speaks of the necessity of reasoning, and 
 resting our convictions on principles, he points out how 
 generally men fail to use their reason. vi. 
 
 " Few men (he says) are from their youth (observe from 
 their yout/i) accustomed to strict reasoning, and to trace the 
 dependence of any truth, in a long train of consequences, 
 to its remotest principles and to observe its connexion ; and he 
 that by frequent practice has not been used to this employ- 
 ment of his understanding, it is no more wonder that he 
 should not, when he is grown into years, be able to bring his 
 mind to it, than that he should not be, on a sudden, able to 
 grave or design, dance on the ropes, or write a good hand, who 
 has never practised either of them. 
 
 " Nay, the most of men are so wholly strangers to this, that 
 they do not so much as perceive their want of it ; they despatch 
 the ordinary business of their callings by rote, as we say, as 
 they have learnt it ; and if at any time they miss success they 
 impute it to anything rather than want of thought or skill."
 
 230 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 Again ( XLIV.) : 
 
 " To accustom ourselves in any question proposed, to 
 examine and find out upon what it bottoms. Most of the 
 difficulties that come in our way, when well considered and 
 traced, lead us to some proposition, which, known to be true, 
 clears the doubt and gives an easy solution of the question : 
 whilst topical and superficial arguments, of which there is store 
 to be found on both sides, filling the head with variety of 
 thoughts and the mouth with copious discourse, serve only to 
 amuse the understanding, and entertain company, without 
 coming to the bottom of the question, the only place of rest 
 and stability for an inquisitive mind, whose tendency is only to 
 truth and knowledge." 
 
 Here then in these quotations we have laid down with 
 sufficient clearness and vigour of language, wherein intellectual 
 virtue consists in almost all the operations of the understand- 
 ing. We now know what is the educational aim as regards 
 intelligence. Is this intellectual excellence, the issue of which 
 is truth and wisdom, to be acquired by simply wishing for it ? 
 Certainly not. It is a habit of mind to which we have to be 
 trained or to train ourselves, and is to be attained only (save in 
 the case of genius) by a slow and laborious process of discipline. 
 
 " What then," Locke says, " should be done in the case ? " 
 ( vi.) " I answer, we should always remember what I said above 
 that the faculties of our souls are improved and made useful to 
 us just after the same manner as our bodies are. Would you 
 have a man write or paint, dance or fence well, or perform any 
 other manual operation dexterously and with ease; let him 
 have ever so much vigour and activity, suppleness and address 
 naturally, yet nobody expects this from him unless he has 
 been used to it, and has employed time and pains in fashion- 
 ing and forming his hand, or outward parts, to these motions. 
 Just so it is in the mind, would you have a man reason well, 
 you must use him to it betimes, exercise his mind in observing
 
 JOHN LOCKE 231 
 
 the connexion of ideas, and following them in train. Nothing 
 does this better than Mathematics, which therefore I think 
 should be taught all those who have the time and opportunity, 
 not so much to make them mathematicians as to make them 
 reasonable creatures; for though we all call ourselves so, because 
 we are born to it if we please, yet we may truly say, nature 
 gives us but the seeds of it: we are born to be, if we please, 
 rational creatures ; but it is use and exercise only that make us 
 so : and we are indeed so, no farther than industry and 
 application have carried us. And, therefore, in ways of reason- 
 ing, which men have not been used to, he that will observe 
 the conclusions they take up must be satisfied they are not 
 all rational." 
 
 Elsewhere he says ( vi.), 
 
 " What then can grown men never be improved or enlarged 
 in their understandings? I say not so; but this I think I 
 may say, that it will not be done without industry and appli- 
 cation, which will require more time and pains than grown 
 men settled in their course of life will allow to it, and there- 
 fore very seldom is done. And this very capacity of attaining 
 it by use and exercise only brings us back to that which I 
 laid down before, that it is only practice that improves our 
 minds as well as bodies, and we must expect nothing from our 
 understandings any farther than they are perfected by habits." 
 
 Conclusion, 
 
 Locke has been called a Realist and Cyclopaedist, and 
 perhaps if we are to classify him he would fall under these 
 designations as compared with other men of his time were we 
 to consider the Thoughts alone ; but the Conduct of the Under- 
 standing throws fresh light on his position. 
 
 As to Encyclopaedism he himself says : " Others that they 
 may seem universally knowing, get a little smattering in every-
 
 232 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 thing. These may fill their heads with superficial notions of 
 things, but are very much out of the way of attaining truth or 
 knowledge." xvm. 
 
 The general object of all instruction he puts before us 
 in the following words (xix.): "The business of education 
 is not to make the young perfect in any one of the sciences, 
 but so to open and dispose their minds as may best make 
 them capable of any, when they shall apply themselves to 
 it. * * It is therefore to give them this freedom that I 
 think they should be made to look into all sorts of knowledge 
 and exercise their understanding in so wide a variety or stock 
 of knowledge. But I do not propose it as a variety and stock 
 of knowledge but a variety and freedom of thinking ; as an 
 increase of the powers and activities of the mind, not as an 
 enlargement of its possessions." 
 
 It is now, I should say, sufficiently clear that if we 
 wish fully to understand Locke's educational views we must 
 read his Thoughts and his Conduct of the Understanding 
 together. And if we do so we find on his own showing, not 
 that Virtue in the moral sense and good manners and general 
 information constitute the sole educational aim, but also Virtue 
 of the Intellect. We also find on his own showing that 
 this latter virtue is truly a training to accurate knowledge of 
 things and words and the putting of a man in possession of 
 his own Reason. We further find that an intellectual result so 
 high is to be attained only by labour, by exercise, by discipline. 
 Let us then read his educational system back from this its 
 admitted aim, and we find it in complete discord with the 
 prevalent tone of the section of the Thoughts which has to do 
 with intelligence and instruction. It is in childhood and 
 boyhood that we can alone sow the seeds of a good habit of 
 Intelligence as well as of a good habit of Will according to 
 Locke himself. The intelligence then has to be trained and 
 disciplined as well as the moral nature. The materials of that 
 training we may take from Locke's Thoughts, if we please,
 
 JOHN LOCKE 233 
 
 but the mode of procedure suggested by him is always vitiated 
 by the exclusion of toil and the overcoming of difficulty. His 
 method is in the Essay essentially subverted by himself. It 
 seems accordingly to be a necessary consequence of Locke's 
 position that through Language and Literature (not therefore 
 excluding other instruments) we can best give that very dis- 
 cipline which Locke finds to be necessary to the full growth 
 of Reason. 
 
 In respect then of Intellectual as well as Moral aims 
 Locke, properly interpreted, is more of a Humanist than a 
 Realist an unimaginative Humanist but yet a Humanist, 
 though not of course in the narrow, classical sense. In respect 
 of the matter of instruction he wisely includes much that did 
 not till recently enter into the curriculum of schools, but he 
 specially guards against too exclusive an occupation of the 
 mind with sense-knowledge in a passage which I have quoted 
 and which is repeated in the Conduct of the Understanding 
 in another and a better form, a repetition which shows the 
 importance he attached to this point. It may seem from 
 the Thoughts that he at least verges on superficial encyclo- 
 paedism, a characteristic generally of the Sense-realists ; but 
 he even guards against this in a passage also cited above. He 
 desires that boys in reading their own tongue or learning a 
 foreign one read about things ; in other words acquire know- 
 ledge as well as words, or rather, with words; and he also 
 desires that many subjects should be taught which in his 
 time were (and still are) neglected, but this does not con- 
 stitute him a Realist in the naturalistic sense. He merely 
 as a philosopher saw that young people must be occupied 
 first and chiefly with the concrete. In this he agrees with 
 Comenius and Milton, and every other competent writer. 
 Encyclopaedism, let me add, in the vulgar sense of the word 
 is a great error in the education of the adolescent, but during 
 the sense and acquisitive period it is to be commended in 
 order that we may attain our ultimate aim, which is that men
 
 234 JOHN LOCKE 
 
 should have a rational attitude to all knowledge, and be open 
 to the influences and experiences and questions of life from day 
 to day. Encyclopaedism, not of acquired knowledge, but of 
 faculty and interest that is what we aim at. 
 
 In respect then both of Aim, Method, and Matter of Edu- 
 cation I claim Locke as essentially a Humanist, who had 
 gone astray on the subject of language and discipline in his 
 Thoughts, while he corrected himself in his Conduct of the 
 Understanding. Had he deliberately connected the latter 
 work with the former he would have seen the true significance, 
 and indeed the necessity, of language-discipline in the school. 
 By what other road indeed save Language and Mathematics is 
 it possible for a man to reach that Ideal of Reason which he 
 sketches in the more advanced book, the statement of his 
 latest thoughts and not published till after his death ? Locke's 
 supreme defect, which detracts from his Humanistic claims, was 
 his inability to see the educative effect of literature as such, and 
 his entire ignorance of the relation of the aesthetic emotions to 
 the moral and religious education of youth. 
 
 I have dwelt longer on Locke than on any other educational 
 writer because I consider him the greatest of them all, in 
 spite of his attitude to Language and Literature, and his 
 encyclopaedism. After all, the encyclopaedism is justifiable 
 from his point of view ; for he was considering the all-round 
 education of a " young gentleman " only ; nor did he for a 
 moment contemplate that all the subjects he recommends 
 should be taught in schools. As to the middle and artizan 
 classes, he belonged to his own epoch and considered that a 
 knowledge of the Bible and of their own trades would suffice. 
 Notwithstanding his debt to Rabelais, and still more to Mon- 
 taigne, his educational conceptions are in the truest sense 
 his own 1 . 
 
 1 His Essay on Study (collected from his Journal) should be read as an 
 appendix to the Conduct of the Understanding. It is printed by Quick at 
 the end of his edition of the Thoughts.
 
 CHAPTER XVI. 
 
 HERBERT SPENCER, THE MODERN 
 SENSE-REALIST. 
 
 I HAD not intended in this volume to speak of the educa- 
 tional system of any contemporary, but on reflection it seemed 
 to me that an exception should be made in the case of 
 Mr Herbert Spencer, whose little volume has had so wide 
 a circulation. And this because I consider him to be the most 
 eminent and most logical representative of the Naturalistic 
 School of Philosophy, sometimes called Sensationalist, Utili- 
 tarian and Phenomenalist 1 . It is most instructive I think to 
 have before us an illustration of the fact that the philosophy 
 of a man must determine his educational theory and his 
 advice to the world as to educational practice. 
 
 It is in the bearing of a philosophical theory on Moral 
 Education the ethical ideal which we propose to ourselves 
 in educating that we see the true significance of the philosophy 
 we profess or affect, and it is this to which I would chiefly refer 
 in the subsequent remarks. 
 
 But first, in justice to Mr Spencer, I must say something on 
 his educational aim. It is " Complete Living." No one can 
 take exception to the phrase so far as it goes, but when we 
 look to its definition by Mr Spencer himself, we find that it 
 
 1 Not that any of these terms accurately describes Mr Spencer's philo- 
 sophical position.
 
 236 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 practically means the adaptation of man to his environment 
 environment of nature and of other men with whom he is 
 associated in a political society "in what way to treat the 
 body ; in what way to treat the mind ; in what way to bring 
 up a family ; in what way to behave as a citizen ; in what way 
 to utilize those sources of happiness which nature supplies ; 
 how to use all our faculties to the greatest advantage of 
 ourselves and others." If we learn to do all this we have 
 attained to " Complete Living." But inasmuch as we cannot 
 exhaust a complete preparation, we must lay chief stress on the 
 most important subjects. 
 
 The subject of primary importance is the preservation of 
 health and life. Therefore teach physiology, that is to say, in 
 the sense of Hygiene. 
 
 Next comes preparation for making a living, and as all 
 industrial activities rest ultimately on science, the subject 
 next in importance to physiology is Science in general and 
 in particular. 
 
 After this will naturally come instruction in the rearing of 
 offspring. This also depends on Science. Then also the moral 
 discipline of offspring can be illuminated only by mental 
 science. 
 
 Next come the functions of the Citizen History properly 
 understood and presented, and Economics. The key is here 
 again Science. 
 
 Finally, those occupations which promote the enjoyment 
 of life and are for leisure are not to be neglected, but 
 postponed ; and even these things Literature, Art, etc., though 
 it may not be at first sight obvious, rest for their true ap- 
 preciation on Science. "Accomplishments, the fine Arts, 
 Literature, etc.," all those things which constitute the efflor- 
 escence of civilization should be wholly subordinate to that 
 instruction and discipline on which investigation rests. "As 
 they occupy the leisure part of life, so should they occupy tlie leisure 
 part of education."
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 237 
 
 Science, also, is not only best for knowledge, but for intel- 
 lectual discipline. Nay also, it has direct bearing on the moral 
 perceptions and the religious emotions. Thus to the question 
 "What knowledge is of most worth?" the uniform reply is 
 'Science.' And to the question "What discipline is of most 
 worth ? " the answer is again ' Science ' ; and this even in the 
 moral and religious sphere. 
 
 We see in all this the most logical and lucid exposition of 
 the educational theory of the Sense-realistic school. It rests 
 on a philosophy of man, which amounts to this, that man's 
 task on this earth is, like that of any other sentient organism, 
 to adapt himself to his environment in order that he may 
 live comfortably, and, as a condition of comfort, reputably. 
 Morality even is subordinated to comfortable living called 
 Complete Living. The theory opposed to this, as light to 
 darkness, we have called the Real-humanistic. Its aim is not 
 complete living but complete life. It may be summed up as 
 character and culture. It seeks to define the life of man as 
 that of a spirit which rises above its environment and seeks 
 ideal aims, ethical, aesthetic, and religious, and a will formed 
 to right conduct. But it does not, on that account, ignore the 
 claims of a knowledge of the phenomenal world and of society 
 and of man's relations to both. It assumes this as necessary 
 alike to conduct and the highest spiritual life; but in the 
 education of the people, as in the development of the man 
 to his full manhood, it regards the knowledge of all that has 
 to do with the body and with nature as merely contributory 
 to true education. 
 
 The best reply to Spencer is Locke, although he was no 
 idealist. And all I would say here is that, suppose we had a 
 man with all the pigeon-holed acquirements that Mr Spencer 
 would give him, we should say ' Now let us begin to educate 
 him.' In fact suppose an anthropoid ape who had lost the 
 divine gift of instinct and was endowed with the imperfect 
 beginnings of reason instead, and Mr Spencer's system of
 
 238 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 education would be admirable. The literary, aesthetic, religious 
 and even morality as an ideal system of perfection, are all 
 decorative merely. The intelligent anthropoid ape's desire for 
 decoration would be satisfied with coloured ribbons and straw 
 which please the village idiot, and would rightly be postponed 
 to material necessities. Man's function on earth, we believe, is 
 to use his environment as a mere basis for higher things the 
 things by which men truly live, and these must from the first 
 and all through, constitute the substance of his education. 
 
 Assuredly, we all hope never to be, and never to meet, 
 that incorporation of the elements of all the sciences which 
 Mr Spencer calls a man, even though endowed with the pru- 
 dential bourgeois morality which by the help of the police keeps 
 things going. A classical prig and pedant is bad enough, but, 
 after all, he is in touch with the best in humanity : the prig 
 pedant who has fed on the dry crumbs of science since he was 
 a baby would be wholly intolerable. There is surely some 
 other ideal of the completely educated man which carries us 
 far beyond the sphere of " complete living " in the Spencerian 
 sense. The total inadequacy of sense-realism to conceive 
 such a theory will I think be well illustrated by turning to 
 Mr Spencer's special treatment of Moral Education which has 
 not so far as I know been subjected to adverse criticism, 
 attention having for the most part been directed to the in- 
 tellectual part of his treatise. 
 
 But before doing so I would say that Mr Spencer's chapter 
 on Method, although it is, perhaps because it is, a collection 
 of recognized precepts lucidly and logically put, is well worthy 
 of the perusal, both of teachers and theorists. 
 
 Moral Education. A Criticism. 
 
 I heartily concur with Mr Spencer, both in the beginning 
 and the conclusion of his chapter on " Moral Education." His 
 first paragraph concludes with this utterance : " The subject
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 239 
 
 which involves all other subjects, and therefore the subject in 
 which education should culminate, is the Theory and Practice 
 of Education." We cannot, of course, teach boys and girls at 
 school how to discharge their duties as parents : at the school 
 age, such instructions could have no link of association with the 
 knowledge and experience of the boy and girl, and would, 
 therefore, be wholly futile. We teach children these, their 
 future duties, by being ourselves an example to them, which 
 they will remember and imitate : nothing in education is so 
 potent as tradition early received. But when Spencer suggests 
 that the education of young men and women should culminate 
 in the study of education that is to say, of moral education 
 I think he gives utterance to a novel idea, which is not to be set 
 hastily aside because of its novelty. Perhaps it will one day be 
 accepted as a truism at least as regards young women. I re- 
 member, many years ago, being much impressed, but, of course, 
 not surprised, when I beheld young ladies hurrying in consider- 
 able numbers to University lectures in Logic, Latin, Mathematics, 
 and Physiology, while the subject which most nearly concerned 
 the future life of more than ninety per cent, of them, viz., Edu- 
 cation, was taken only by the few who meant to be school 
 teachers. It will not always be so. Mothers of the wealthier 
 classes will tell us that they have no time for the training of 
 their children ; the demands of society are too exacting to 
 admit of it. The day will come, if the race is to make progress, 
 when it will be the other way about, and " Society " will have to 
 content itself with taking a second place, while the duties of the 
 nursery and the parlour will make good their prior claim. If 
 the mother, though never the sole, yet always (theoretically, at 
 least) the chief educator, is unfit for these duties, as is too 
 commonly the case, it is just as well that she should delegate 
 them, for, as Spencer truly says, "The defects of children 
 mirror the defects of their parents " a remark to be extended, 
 I need scarcely say, from the parent to the teacher. That the 
 teacher who professes to be an educator should study education
 
 240 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 before he enters on his task would seem to be a proposition 
 beyond all question, and yet it is still questioned by not a few 
 survivals of a passing generation at Eton and elsewhere. 
 
 Mr Spencer adverts to the irrational severity of domestic 
 discipline, but he omits the still greater evils which flow from 
 the training which is irrationally indulgent. In this respect 
 Locke takes a much firmer and more profound view of the re- 
 lation between parent and child, though he errs in the excessive 
 severity which lies at the foundation of his system of moral 
 training. We are not to suppose that over-indulgence is limited 
 to the well-to-do ; it is even more common among the poor 
 varied, of course, with fits of passion. The following incident 
 (a part of my own personal experience) sums up the attitude of 
 the indulgent maternal mind : 
 
 " Why do you not send your children to school? " said the 
 minister to a fisherwoman in a Banffshire village. 
 
 " Because they dinna want to gang," answers the mother. 
 
 " But, surely, it is not what they want that you should 
 think of, but what is good for them." 
 
 "Oh, puir things," retorts the mother, "they maun hae 
 their ane wull, for it's a' we puir folk hae to gie them"! 
 
 So far, I say, we shall concur with Mr Spencer. But now he 
 plunges into a sea of error, putting what he has to say, however, 
 in a way so lucid, pleasant, and seeming-logical as to seduce 
 the young reader into the acceptance of a fatal doctrine a 
 doctrine, moreover, which, if understood and held, degrades 
 the position, by degrading the aims and work, of the educator. 
 He discusses the end or aim of moral education, and the relation 
 of this end or aim to an ideal morality and an ideal system of 
 training. Adaptation to environment governs all he says in the 
 moral, as it did in the intellectual, education of the young. 
 
 Here I shall let Spencer speak for himself before I proceed 
 to criticize his position : 
 
 " Even were there methods by which the desired end [the
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 24! 
 
 practice of an ideal system of morality] could be at once 
 effected, and even had fathers and mothers sufficient insight, 
 sympathy, and self-command to employ these methods consis- 
 tently, it might still be contended that it would be of no use 
 to reform family government faster than other things are 
 reformed. What is it we aim to do ? Is it not that education, 
 of whatever kind, has for its proximate end to prepare a child 
 for the business of life to produce a citizen who, while he is 
 well-conducted, is also able to make his way in the world? And 
 does not making his way in the world (by which we mean, not 
 the acquirement of wealth, but of the funds requisite for 
 bringing-up a family) does not this imply a certain fitness for 
 the world as it now is ? And if by any system of culture an 
 ideal human being could be produced, is it not doubtful whether 
 he would be fit for the world as it now is ? May we not, on 
 the contrary, suspect that his too keen sense of rectitude, and 
 too elevated standard of conduct, would make life intolerable 
 or even impossible ? And, however admirable the result might 
 be, considered individually, would it not be self-defeating in so 
 far as society and posterity are concerned ? There is much 
 reason for thinking that, as in a nation so in a family, the kind 
 of government is, on the whole, about as good as the general 
 state of human nature permits it to be. We may argue that, 
 in the one case, as in the other, the average character of the 
 people determines the quality of the control exercised. In 
 both cases it may be inferred that amelioration of the average 
 character leads to an amelioration of system ; and further that, 
 were it impossible to ameliorate the system without the average 
 character being first ameliorated, evil rather than good would 
 follow. Such degree of harshness as children now experience 
 from their parents and teachers may be regarded as but a 
 preparation for that greater harshness which they will meet with 
 on entering the world. And it may be argued that, were it 
 possible for parents and teachers to treat them with perfect 
 equity and entire sympathy, it would but intensify the sufferings 
 L. 16
 
 242 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 which the selfishness of men must, in after life, inflict on 
 them. 
 
 "'But does not this prove too much?' someone will ask. 
 ' If no system of moral training can forthwith make children 
 what they should be if, even were there a system that would 
 do this, existing parents are too imperfect to carry it out and 
 if, even could such a system be successfully carried out, its 
 results would be disastrously incongruous with the present state 
 of society does it not follow that to reform the system now in 
 use is neither practicable nor desirable?' No. It merely 
 follows that reform in domestic government must go on part 
 passu with other reforms. It merely follows that methods of 
 discipline neither can be nor should be ameliorated except by 
 instalments. It merely follows that the dictates of abstract 
 rectitude will, in practice, inevitably be subordinated by the 
 present state of human nature by the imperfections alike of 
 children, of parents, and of society and can only be better 
 fulfilled as the general character becomes better. 
 
 '"At any rate, then,' may rejoin our critic, 'it is clearly use- 
 less to set up any ideal standard of family discipline. There 
 can be no advantage in elaborating and recommending methods 
 that are in advance of the time.' Again we contend for the 
 contrary. Just as in the case of political government, though 
 pure rectitude may be at present impracticable, it is requisite to 
 know where the right lies, in order that the changes we make 
 may be towards the right instead of away from it ; so, in the 
 case of domestic government, an ideal must be upheld, that 
 there may be gradual approximations to it. We need fear no 
 evil consequences from the maintenance of such an ideal. On 
 the average, the constitutional conservatism of mankind is strong 
 enough to prevent too rapid a change. Things are so organized 
 that, until men have grown up to the level of a higher belief, 
 they cannot receive it ; nominally they may hold it, but not 
 virtually. And, even when the truth gets recognized, the 
 obstacles to conformity with it are so persistent as to outlive
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 243 
 
 the patience of philanthropists, and even of philosophers. We 
 may be sure, therefore, that the difficulties in the way of a 
 normal government of children will always put an adequate 
 check upon the efforts to realize it." Note now the "proxi- 
 mate end" of moral education, as defined by Spencer (p. 99), 
 viz.: "to produce a citizen who is well-conducted, and is also 
 able to make his way in the world," that is to say, "acquire the 
 funds requisite for bringing-up a family." This "proximate 
 end" he elsewhere identifies with the "practical ideal." 
 
 We at once quarrel with Mr Spencer's conception of 
 the moral or ethical end. If he simply means that, try as 
 we may, we ourselves shall never be able to lead ideal lives 
 or train up others to lead them, he utters a commonplace 
 which is all too true ; but this is not what he means, as we may 
 see from the rest of his argument. Although it may be that we 
 must often enough be content with the attainment of a "proxi- 
 mate end," in the sense of an approximation to an ideal end, 
 the approximation is not our end or aim. The proximate end, 
 as conceived by Mr Spencer, has its value; but as an edu- 
 cational end it is contemptible, and would take the very heart 
 out of any teacher worth his salt. There is such a conception 
 as that of the ideal man : that is to say, the man to whom the 
 great ethical ideas of justice, benevolence, integrity, purity, 
 and the thought of God in whom all ideals rest, are a sacred 
 possession, and who strives daily to make them the guide of 
 his conduct, though they may often lead him to suffering, nay, 
 sometimes to death. No man succeeds perfectly ; but, that 
 each may be even such as he is, it is necessary that he strive 
 after something higher than his actual attainment or the prac- 
 tical ideal. In the ideas resides the imperative moral law, and 
 it is this the true man would fain, by God's help, fulfil. The 
 fulfilment of the law in the ideas is the spiritual life the true 
 life of a rational spirit; all else is life inadequate and im- 
 perfect. This true life is, for each, simply the completion of 
 himself as man. All created things tend unconsciously or 
 
 1 6 2
 
 244 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 consciously, through the forces within them, to their own 
 fulfilment or completion, while the self-conscious man purposely 
 endeavours to realize that fulfilment in himself, if he is to be 
 truly man. This, I submit, is the true doctrine ; and it is to 
 this we have to educate children and youths ; and if we fail, 
 accept our failure. It is also, substantially at least, the doctrine 
 of Plato, Aristotle, and the New Testament. 
 
 I must assume that you have read the relative passages in 
 Spencer. If you have, you will have learned that the young 
 must not be trained to seek and serve the ideal, but for the 
 " world as it now is." If too good for it, or trying to rise above 
 the average, first the child, then the youth, and finally the man 
 will suffer. We must abjure the highest, because it leads to 
 possible pain this pain having chiefly or wholly to do with 
 our "getting on." We must not try to be better than our 
 neighbours. If a youth has ideals of conduct, he must keep 
 them under lock and key. They are too good for daily use. 
 He had better, I should say, expunge them from his mind 
 altogether, lest he should inadvertently act in accordance with 
 them. His best course would be not to deny their existence, 
 but to write them on a card, and hang them on his walls, to be 
 read over say, on birthdays ; but, when he has read them, he 
 must, with a cynical smile, exclaim : " All these I shall not 
 observe from my youth up. These are the solid coins of fools, 
 but only the counters of wise men in this sense : that the 
 wise do not deny their absolute truth as symbolic of something 
 or other which is real and true ideally, but they must not treat 
 these idealities as realities here and now in this world. They 
 are for some other place and time." 
 
 This is no misrepresentation of our author, for he admits 
 that there is a true ideal ; it is to be known to us that we may 
 be aware "where the truth lies," and to guide us in making 
 cautious and calculated changes in the right and true direction; 
 but that is all. You may live, more or less, according to an 
 ideal standard, and teach others to live according to an ideal
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 245 
 
 standard, but only in so far as it does not separate you and 
 others too far from the common motives that govern the 
 average man. Out of a kind consideration for those who have 
 an ideal standard, Spencer condescends to say, that if we only 
 work in the direction of it, without trying too hard, "we need 
 fear no evil consequences"! (p. 101). Such, according to 
 Spencer, is the moral aim generally, and such the place and 
 dangers of the ideal. 
 
 I would remark that this practical ideal of Spencer's is not 
 an ideal at all. There cannot, if there is any meaning in words, 
 be two ideals. The practical ideal, which he commends, is the 
 ideal ; the other ideal what we should call the ideal is with 
 him so remote as to be little better than an illusion. What 
 reality can there be in that which cannot be used ? 
 
 " Let us now," he says, " consider the true aims and 
 methods." But there is confusion here, for he has already 
 given us his true aim, which is that a man shall be trained 
 "to be no better than he should be," to use a phrase which 
 is strictly true of Spencer's aim, and conveys also its criticism. 
 
 Spencer has already, I repeat, got his aim or end in the 
 sphere of moral education, and what he now proceeds to 
 consider are the methods whereby we may attain that aim or 
 end how we are to train children to be as good as their 
 neighbours, and prevent their being any better, lest "evil 
 consequences" should follow. But he is, very naturally 
 indeed, necessarily, when he begins to think of method led 
 aside for a moment to consider the final standard or criterion 
 of all morality whatsoever. He has already said, remember, 
 that our approximate end, as he calls it, is to produce a well- 
 conducted citizen, who "can make his living," etc. That there 
 is an ideal greater and higher than this, however, he admits, 
 but he sets it aside as if it were the dream of enthusiasts 
 something we may as well know, that our conduct generally, 
 and our teaching generally, may tend that way, so far as it
 
 246 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 t's quite safe. There might, he grants, flow "evil consequences" 
 even from merely keeping ideals in view; there is some danger 
 in this, but he trusts to human wickedness and weakness to 
 obviate these evils. That is to say, the evil in men may be 
 trusted to obviate the evils arising from the pursuit of the 
 ideal good a singular position ! There is manifestly some- 
 thing hopelessly mixed here, to say the least. The evil in 
 man is to be relied on to keep him safe from evil a re- 
 markable assertion ! We wonder what the author can mean 
 by "evil," and in what sense he uses the word. 
 
 And he must sympathise with the wonder of his reader, 
 for he proceeds to consider how the (dangerous) true and 
 absolute ideal in life and conduct is ascertained. By what 
 mark shall I know it when I see it? What is its criterion? 
 Important this, because it may not only make the whole 
 argument logical and coherent, but also, perhaps, suggest a 
 method of procedure in educating the young. The criterion 
 or standard he seeks is thus propounded : that conduct is 
 right and good "whose total consequences are beneficial"; 
 and by the word 'beneficial' he means "resulting in happiness." 
 This is the way (we are told) we find the true the moral ideal. 
 
 But as he has already said that we must not make the ideal 
 our aim in educating, but that our aim should rather be the 
 adapting of the young to the time and circumstances in which 
 they live a training of them to a kind of average morality 
 which sets aside the ideal and perfection as idle dreams the 
 standard of the said ideal which he now exhibits to us lands 
 him in endless contradictions. If the ideal is that whose 
 total consequences are most pleasurable and beneficial, then, 
 surely, we ought always ourselves to aim at the "most pleasur- 
 able and beneficial," in other words, the true ideal, and train 
 the young to do so ; for, if we do not aim at it, we shall be 
 aiming at something which is not pleasant and beneficial, or, 
 at best, only in a minor and subordinate degree pleasant and 
 beneficial. To do what is most pleasant and beneficial to you
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 247 
 
 as a man, would, inasmuch as it is the true ideal, be unpleasant 
 and unbeneficial ! Has he not already virtually said, "Be not too 
 good, lest you suffer in this unsatisfactory world"? And now he 
 tells us that the goodest goodness is the pleasantest thing goin: 
 How, then, by pursuing this goodest goodness this true and 
 absolute ideal can I suffer at least in the moral and spiritual 
 sense? Why should I content myself with hanging up ideal 
 principles on the wall, and suspending them in my daily 
 conduct? How, in short, can that which is "pleasant and 
 beneficial " be undesirable, according to Spencer's theory of 
 morals? Not to aim at the "ideal" is to aim at that which 
 is not pleasant and beneficial, according to Mr Spencer's own 
 theory, or, at least, not so pleasant and beneficial as the ideal, 
 by his own showing, is. This is a singular result of the 
 happiness theory of morals. He would rejoin, doubtless, that 
 the practical ideal it is which contradicts the true ideal. Men 
 are not yet ready for the pleasures of the true ideal ; it would 
 be painful to them, not pleasant; striving itself, in fact, is 
 unpleasant ; therefore, don't strive. 
 
 Now, I do not think we can let such an argument pass with- 
 out protest. If the true ideal is the most pleasurable in its 
 consequences, it can have been ascertained only by experience 
 if not the experience of everybody, yet the experience of 
 Mr Spencer and other thinking men. If so, then it is surely 
 his duty to educate to this " highest pleasure," this true ideal, 
 and not to allow his fellow-men to go on living without even 
 trying to get the "greatest pleasure." Doubtless, he might reply : 
 "I cannot admit the duty, because I know very well the mass 
 of mankind cannot rise to such enjoyments." Then, we say : 
 Why talk about the true ideal at all, and dangle it before their 
 eyes as a thing first to be looked at and then to be looked away 
 from? For, if it is the highest pleasure, it can exist to their 
 consciousness at all only in so far (according to your criterion) 
 as it is conceived as the highest pleasure the ideal. For the 
 ideal and the highest pleasure are interchangeable terms.
 
 248 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 Accordingly, it can only add to their pain, not their pleasure, 
 to see the highest pleasure, and then to be told to rest content 
 with the lower pleasure, as best suited to them. And, again, if 
 they pursue the lower pleasure, as best suited to them and 
 their environment, this must mean that they get more pleasure 
 out of the lesser pleasure than they could out of the so-called 
 greater pleasure. Their ideal is, in short, the lesser pleasure, 
 and they have as much right to call it the true ideal as you 
 have to call the scheme of life hanging on the wall the true 
 ideal. " So long as they are happy, what's the odds?" 
 
 True, Mr Spencer might say : " I do not try to teach what 
 I regard as the highest pleasure, the true ideal, to children and 
 men because I would not disturb them in their greatest pleasure 
 [beer and skittles], though it is really painful to them more 
 than they know ; but to pursue the true greatest pleasure, the 
 true ideal, would be more painful still." Then, may I not 
 rejoin, neither the true ideal nor the pursuit of the true ideal is 
 so pleasurable to them as their own lower ideal, and (according 
 to you) greater pain? That is to say, they already have the true 
 ideal, and not you at all. They have summed up one way, 
 and you have summed up another ; your criterion or standard 
 is manifestly no standard, for a standard is not a standard unless 
 it is a fixed something by which all else can be measured. 
 Pleasure and pain, we may conclude, are not the criteria of 
 virtue and vice. 
 
 Another answer to the question, "Why do you not train 
 men to the highest pleasure, the true ideal?" might be this. 
 Mr Spencer might, quite consistently, say that he did not try 
 to teach men the highest pleasure, the true ideal, because it 
 was such a bore to him. In other words, the mere labour of 
 doing so was a pain greater than any pleasure that could come 
 out of it to him, and, as detracting from his pleasure, detract 
 consequently from his own ideal moral state. In brief, to 
 attempt to convert men to his ideal, he would, in his own 
 person, be untrue to the standard of all morality the greatest
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 249 
 
 sum of pleasure ; nay, inasmuch as it would be purposely done, 
 he would be profoundly immoral in so acting, so far as his own 
 ethical completeness was concerned. Nay, further, knowing, as 
 he did, the pain they would suffer from pursuing his ideal, his 
 purpose would be a purpose of evil at best, a doing evil that 
 good might, perhaps, come. But, surely, we ought not to be 
 afraid to teach men the true ideal the most pleasurable ; for 
 has it not been already said that, men being so wicked and 
 weak, we need not anticipate any "evil consequences" from 
 keeping the ideal in view. This ought to console us, and 
 encourage us in teaching the true ideal. "Do not hang back," 
 he might say, "for the pursuit of that which is absolutely 
 pleasant and beneficial (the true ideal) will not result in evil 
 consequences (i.e. the unpleasant and unbeneficial) so much as 
 we might fear (!), because men have such a strong natural bias 
 to the unpleasant and unbeneficial." 
 
 It is assumed, remember, all this while, that there exists 
 a true moral ideal ; it is distinctly stated that that moral ideal 
 yields the maximum of pleasure, and is finally to be tested by 
 its power to do so ; but we are to set it aside in favour of the 
 relatively right and good the practical ideal of that which 
 shall make us good enough, and no more, for the society into 
 which we are born. In other words, we are to adopt as our 
 standard the less pleasurable and the less beneficial meanwhile, 
 in order that we may secure the maximum of pleasure obtain- 
 able now and here London, 1902 the maximum possibile 
 varying as we may happen to be in England or France or 
 Syria or India or China. Why are we to do so? Because if 
 a man aimed at true and genuine pleasure and happiness, and 
 so lived, or strove to live, the true ideal life, he would, inasmuch 
 as his " sense of rectitude " would then be too keen and his 
 standard of conduct too " elevated " (p. 99), fail to secure the 
 greatest pleasure and benefit ; therefore, the standard of conduct 
 is never that which would yield to a man the greatest pleasure 
 and benefit, but that which would, taking all his circumstances
 
 250 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 into consideration, yield the greatest pleasure and benefit in his 
 own judgment at the moment. As it is absurd, in such a case, 
 to suppose a man not choosing the greater pleasure, we may be 
 sure he always does so ; consequently, every man is always 
 moral, always in harmony with his ideal, i.e., his greatest 
 pleasure and happiness at the time. 
 
 And yet there can be no doubt that Mr Spencer does 
 actually believe in a true moral ideal which, though measured 
 by pleasure, is different from a "practical" ideal also measured 
 by pleasure. But, if we are to measure conduct by the sum of 
 the pleasurable which it yields, and not by law, how can any ideal 
 be truer than another ? Mr Spencer has no right to speak of a 
 true ideal which shall be a standard for all ; one man's ideal is 
 as good as another's if it happens to be the greatest pleasure 
 for him, which we may always presume it is, for why should he 
 not choose pleasure ? What prevents him doing as he pleases, 
 unless it be the policeman ? But although Mr Spencer has, in 
 my opinion, no philosophical right to speak of a true ideal, he 
 yet does so, and sets this true ideal against the practical ideal. 
 The former, Spencer evidently quite honestly holds to be truly 
 morality as being the true ideal ; the latter, then, is not morality 
 at all, but an approximation, an adaptation of some of the 
 truths of morality to the average of a particular time, place, 
 and circumstance. This latter is always at war with the former 
 the true ideal and our business is, according to Mr Spencer, 
 after taking a passing glance at the impossible true ideal of 
 conduct to educate ourselves and others in that which is not 
 too moral that is to say, not too pleasure-giving, not too bene- 
 ficial in its results! 
 
 It is manifest, then, that the " practical " moral ideal, which 
 is to be the working ideal of teacher and parent, is a gathering 
 together of the dubious and admittedly defective, untrue, and 
 pain-giving principles which regulate the Church, the Market, 
 and 'Change, and training our children in these. Be just, but 
 not too just ; be benevolent, but not too benevolent ; be self-
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 251 
 
 controlled, but not too self-controlled ; be pure, but not too 
 pure ; be virtuous, but not too virtuous ; be good, but not too 
 good : this is the working ideal. 
 
 Where, then, can the true ideal the just, the good, the 
 noble, the heroic, the self-sacrificing, and so forth be all this 
 while ? In Spencer's view, doubtless, as well as in ours, this 
 ideal is in the thoughts of all the wise of all ages, who have 
 preached it and pressed it on men, not altogether in vain. 
 Have they been wrong to preach it as yielding a scheme of 
 conduct? If not, are we wrong to teach it? Shall we de- 
 liberately counterwork it ? Shall we set aside Christ and Paul, 
 and all the philosophers and poets, and say to them, " Go to, 
 do not interfere with our practical teaching; do not fill our 
 children's heads with ideal nonsense. We have to prepare 
 for the world that now is, and the world is to him who can 
 take it ; and he alone can take it who sands the sugar of his 
 justice, who waters the milk of his human-kindness, who mixes 
 his truthfulness with prevarications, his wisdom with cunning, 
 his self-sacrifice with selfishness, his reverence with impudence, 
 his nobleness with ignobleness, his virtue with vice, his good 
 with evil." If Mr Spencer does not mean this, what does he 
 mean ? Do you not feel that there is an error somewhere, that 
 Mr Spencer and his school either use language in a non-natural 
 sense, or that they are hopelessly wrong in their attempts to 
 give the philosophy of the moral and spiritual life of man ? 
 The maximum of pleasure, now and here, is to be your aim, 
 and you are not to bother yourselves or your pupils about the 
 true ideal (the most pleasurable, note), save by a passing 
 allusion to what is essentially an illusion. Now, to compare 
 such teaching as this of Spencer's with that of Greek or Roman 
 thought, would be an insult to the latter. Nay, even the edu- 
 cated Chinaman would abjure it, and as to Christianity, what 
 shall we say ? Is this the teaching of Christ ? And yet our 
 training colleges exist as Christian institutions. The Churches 
 are eager to take Government money to conduct these colleges
 
 252 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 in order that, at the very fountain-head, they may guarantee 
 Christian teachers and Christian teaching ; and this is the 
 book 1 which those who are shortly to be placed in a position 
 of authority over the coming generation are told to study as 
 if it were a Gospel a new evangel to English men and women. 
 In one room the Churches teach Christ, and in the other 
 Spencer Christ the teacher of Divine law, the preacher of 
 transcendent ideals, the priest of self-sacrifice. I do not doubt 
 that the training college authorities, generally at least, try to 
 counteract this teaching ; but is it wise to give young and 
 whoUy unformed minds such a foundation for their philosophy 
 of life ? 
 
 According to Spencer, Christ on the cross, and all the 
 crucified and self-sacrificed martyrs, were enjoying the greatest 
 sum of pleasure possible for them. I ask you : Is this the 
 true reading of history? According to Spencer, it was foolish 
 of Christ and the others ; they were mistaken. They were 
 blind to their environment. Unadapted to their environment 
 they did not "survive." Mr Spencer might, perhaps, admit 
 that they were nobly blind; but he must at heart despise 
 their intelligence, and denounce their blunder. No wonder 
 the people mocked at them and went off self-corn placently 
 to their beer and skittles their greatest sum of pleasure, and, 
 therefore, as moral and as lofty as the faith of the martyr on 
 the cross or the rack. Alas, for Christ and the others, who 
 misprized the common pleasures of life ; tliey had made a mistake 
 in arithmetic. That figure there on the board, running into 
 the thousands, with a fraction (a circulating decimal, and a 
 little elusive), represents pleasures; it has to be divided by 
 something called the "sum," and these mistaken martyrs 
 brought out a wrong quotient. 
 
 It would be out of place here to enter further into philo- 
 sophical argument than we have done. But, speaking generally, 
 
 1 It is no longer specially recommended.
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 253 
 
 I may say that the Christian faith (it matters not to what extent 
 men may differ regarding facts and doctrines) always includes 
 this ethical substance, viz. the innate instincts and needs of 
 man's nature, as a complex of feeling, tendency, emotion, and 
 reason, yield to us, in the long-run, certain ethical ideas for 
 example, truthfulness, benevolence, justice, integrity, purity, 
 self-sacrifice, and so forth ; these ideas, in their highest and 
 purest form, constitute the law of our nature the law of God 
 in us. It matters not that these ideas may have taken gener- 
 ations to grow, if they are the true reading of the moral and 
 spiritual nature of man. It is precisely these ideas, in their 
 most generalized and universal form, with Divine law inherent 
 in them, that constitute the ethical ideal ; and up to this we 
 have ourselves to strive, and up to this we have to educate the 
 young. The process by which we educate them we call training 
 to the good, and discipline to duty ; and the question of method, 
 which so much concerns us as teachers, is simply an inquiry 
 into the " way " whereby we may build up this ethical ideal 
 in the minds of children and youths, and make it the motive 
 force in their conduct of life, as at once the law of God 
 and alone the true life of man on earth here and now. 
 This brings us to the question of method, as dealt with by 
 Mr Spencer. 
 
 As might be expected, his method is the method of conse- 
 quences. We accept this. In our own adult case, however, the 
 consequences of misconduct are the inner pain of sentiment 
 ignored, of a foregone ideal, of a broken law, of an outraged 
 nature, of God defied ; and in the case of the young, the pain 
 of the disapprobation of teachers and parents, as embodying 
 for the young the ideal and the law. Material consequences 
 may or may not follow that is to say, the punishment of the 
 body in various ways, direct and indirect, positive and negative. 
 Whether they should ever follow is one of the debated ques- 
 tions.
 
 254 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 You will see that, even to train up children to be no better 
 than they should be, and always to choose what yields the 
 most pleasure, some method is wanted. They have to be taught 
 wherein their true pleasure lies when they are men, although 
 it may seem not to be their true pleasure when children, 
 because of their immaturity of judgment. How are we to 
 proceed? Doubtless, if we may make a reasonable inference 
 from a statement in the beginning of the chapter, Spencer would 
 say, along with all other educational moralists, "By example." 
 But, outside example, some other mode of procedure is 
 necessary. This mode of procedure is called a method. Now, 
 it is manifest that if morality is identical with the most beneficial 
 or pleasing consequences, I must train to morality by painful 
 consequences. The child-sum of pleasures must bjs rectified 
 by the adult-sum. 
 
 Mr Spencer points out, I have just said, that the method is 
 the method of consequences ; but the consequences are, in the 
 larger part of his argument, always material, not moral with 
 the boy, the pain of burning his finger or having to put right 
 what he has put wrong ; with the man, indigestion or the pain 
 of being deprived of his salary or the injury to his prospects of 
 salary. Thus, he says, the child and the youth attain to a 
 " knowledge of right and wrong by personal experience of good 
 and bad consequences." 
 
 If I amuse myself by sticking a pin into my leg, I feel 
 pain, and I seek some other amusement in future. There is 
 here what Spencer calls a "natural reaction" that is to say, 
 nature instantaneously punishes an infraction of nature's laws. 
 Spencer's main proposition, then, as regards method of moral 
 training is, let the reaction of nature take place. Now, it is 
 not morally wrong to stick a pin into my leg. It is merely 
 a physical miscalculation. Mr Spencer confounds moral and 
 emotional with purely physical reactions. When a little boy, in 
 his anger, smashes his mother's best china- bowl, the natural 
 reaction is a feeling of great satisfaction. When he burns his
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 255 
 
 catechism in the hope of so ending a painful series of daily lessons, 
 the flames are less bright and joyous than those that blaze up 
 in his own heart. This is, as a matter of fact, the natural 
 reaction. Then, again, when he climbs a tree, and falls and 
 breaks a leg, the natural reaction of his being such a goose as 
 to lose hold of one footing before he has secured the next is 
 manifest. He has broken a physical law, but not a moral law, 
 and must take the physical consequences. If he has taken 
 firm hold, and secures the object of his ambition the thrush's 
 nest and sells the eggs for 6d. apiece, he now enjoys the 
 natural reaction, as before he suffered from it. It is quite clear 
 from these illustrations that "natural reactions" are outside 
 the moral sphere altogether, and that if there be anything 
 immoral in his act, it must arise in some other way. In what 
 way ? It arises from the fact that he has broken a moral law ; 
 and that moral law can only be to a child the command of his 
 parents and teachers. What, then, is the natural reaction? 
 Spencer gets so confused over his natural reactions that he 
 begins, towards the end of this chapter, to see that he is some- 
 how wrong, and says that the disapprobation of the parent or 
 teacher is itself a "natural reaction." Here he is at last on 
 the right scent. But what becomes of his original "natural" 
 reaction? The natural reactions he has been talking of are 
 the reactions of nature in the sense of physical laws. He 
 would now include the parent's disapprobation under the same 
 head, using the word " natural " in the vulgar sense of what 
 might be "reasonably expected to follow." I see my boy in the 
 tree where he has been told not to go. Am I cunningly to 
 shake it, that I may cause him to fall and break his leg, and so 
 facilitate the natural reaction? What natural reaction the 
 reaction of physical law or of moral law? Is this to be his 
 punishment, a fall that breaks his leg, and to which I have 
 cunningly contributed ? I think not. The parent who did it 
 would soon be in the hands of the police. 
 
 In fact, the much-lauded doctrine of natural reactions in
 
 256 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 the sense of reactions of physical law, carries us a very little way 
 indeed. At best it is a physical reaction to a breach of physical 
 law. We are compelled from the first to consider moral re- 
 actions for moral offences, and let the physical blunders correct 
 themselves, after we have given due warning. 
 
 No parent or teacher needs to be told that ninety-nine 
 per cent, of the wrong-doing of the young is, not a breach of 
 physical laws, but simply disobedience the breach of moral 
 law as that is centred in the parent or teacher, the moral 
 authority set over them. There would be no natural reaction 
 (i.e., no material consequences) at all in the great majority of 
 cases of wrong-doing, and the majority of the remainder would 
 be pleasant were it not for the purposed intervention of the 
 parent or teacher, who deliberately inflicts certain unpleasant 
 material consequences under the name of punishments. And 
 Mr Spencer himself is compelled to admit that this is so, for 
 when he leaves certain little childish faults behind him, he 
 virtually admits that he is on the wrong track, and has to rest 
 the training of the child on the simple approval or disapproval 
 of the master or parent, with such punishments, if any, as they 
 may choose to inflict. There is no other course open to him. 
 In the sphere of child-morality there is no " natural ' : reaction 
 available, except approval or disapproval. But if this is so in 
 all important cases, it is equally true of the unimportant. The 
 child who makes a litter (to take Mr Spencer's illustration), and 
 is required as a punishment to put things right, is not morally 
 educated by that, but by the disapproval of his mother, who 
 emphasizes her disapproval by imposing this task a course of 
 conduct on her part to be justified by the fact that it impresses 
 her disapproval and puts it in a concrete form. Again, the 
 restitution of a stolen knife, or of the knife of another lost 
 through carelessness, does not give rise to any moral feeling ; 
 that moral feeling must precede the restitution, this latter being 
 only the outward and visible sign of an inward spiritual grace. 
 So the boy, of whom Spencer speaks, who, having been kindly
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 257 
 
 and generously treated by an elder, declines to do a kindness 
 to him in return, and, when he finds the consequences of it in 
 the elder refusing to amuse him any more, then, and not till then, 
 of his own accord brings him his shaving water and boots in 
 order to restore friendly relations, has gone through no moral 
 training at all, except in so far as he first felt the disapprobation 
 of his elder, &&&, feeling that, felt his own unworthiness, and then 
 tried to make amends. And what does Mr Spencer himself 
 say of the father who has the " perfect confidence and affection 
 of his children " ? He says that the said father finds that the 
 "simple display of his approbation or disapprobation gives 
 him abundant power of control." Of course it does. But is 
 this the calculation of material consequences by the children ? 
 If so, they are mean and demoralized little monsters. 
 
 Thus the method of Spencer, no less than his end and 
 criterion, breaks down all round, even taking him on his own 
 showing ; and, in so many words, he has to tell us at last what 
 he ought to have told us in the beginning, that the disappro- 
 bation or approbation of the teacher is itself a " natural 
 reaction," and this is not a reaction of nature at all, but a 
 moral consequence. Mr Spencer, when he gets on the right 
 track, begins to talk of sympathy between parent and child, and 
 the power of approbation and disapprobation where this sym- 
 pathy exists. With all this I believe we should all substantially 
 concur, as well as with his remarks on the importance of not 
 expecting children to be too good, and so forth. But as regards 
 the moral end, the moral aim, the moral motive, the moral 
 criterion, and the moral method, his doctrine is always wrong, 
 and sometimes pernicious. Then, when he begins at last to 
 see light, in the course of his fluent argument, instead of tearing 
 up his MS. and beginning over again from a new and higher 
 point of view, he involves himself in intellectual confusion and 
 moral contradiction, as he did when he spoke of true and 
 practical ideals. 
 
 The old doctrine of " natural reactions," which Mr Spencer 
 L. 17
 
 258 HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 fathers anew, simply amounts to this : " We see how nature 
 inflicts a physical penalty for a breach of physical law ; if, then, 
 we desire to inflict a physical punishment over and above the 
 moral penalty, so as to emphasize the breach of moral law, let 
 us take a hint from nature, and let our physical punishment, 
 as far as possible, have some relation to the physical character of 
 the moral offence. It is not a method of moral education at all ; 
 but simplya Rule to guide us when we find it necessary to mark, 
 in an external way, our disapproval or condemnation the dis- 
 approval being the essential punishment, and the gain of that 
 disapproval being the stirring-up of a moral emotion in the 
 breasts of the young. Even as a rule for our guidance in 
 carrying our moral disapproval out into painful material conse- 
 quences, the method of natural reactions is of very restricted 
 application. Bentham's word is much preferable. Let the 
 punishment, he says, be " characteristical." It is the voice of 
 moral authority, and the force of example in the parent and 
 teacher, that teach morality. In brief, and without dwelling 
 longer on the subject, I repeat that the whole principle of 
 natural reactions does not touch the theory of punishment for 
 moral offences, but at best only gives a rule for the selection 
 of physical punishments when we have once made up our 
 mind, on moral grounds, to inflict them, and then, if possible, 
 they should certainly be " characteristical." 
 
 I would impress the futility of the so-called method on you 
 with a few additional remarks. It is evident enough that, follow- 
 ing the rule of natural reactions without considering moral 
 elements, we should constantly be led into blunders. When 
 a boy breaks a wine-glass through carelessness, we might say 
 that he should be required to replace it; but "nature" does 
 not require this, and to insist on it would be unjust. If he is 
 the son of poor parents, and makes great efforts to economize, 
 with a view to replacing it, he does so because of his feeling of 
 sympathy with his parents in their loss, and of vexation with 
 himself, as having inadvertently caused a loss. The replace-
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 259 
 
 ment, then, is a moral act pure and simple, and has nothing to 
 do with nature's reactions. If, again, he has broken the glass 
 intentionally, in order to pay his parents out for some imaginary 
 injustice, there is no natural reaction of replacement, but quite 
 the reverse. He would like to break two glasses. This is the 
 natural reaction ; and, if I wish to correct the boy, I must first 
 get him to feel what the good boy, who inadvertently broke 
 the glass, felt, and, out of the strength of that feeling, condemn 
 himself, and seek to make restitution. Bentham's recommenda- 
 tion is a sound one, because, among other advantages, it admits 
 of our bringing in reason and common-sense to control nature's 
 reactions, which are generally irrational. A good thing it is that 
 we have to determine punishments, and not nature ; for nature 
 is blind, and stupid, and often cruel. Spencer says that natural 
 reactions are "pure justice." On the contrary, they very 
 seldom are justice at all, if men do not guide and control 
 them. Natural reactions are constantly too slight for the 
 offence, more frequently too grave. Two boys are clambering 
 over a high wall. They have no right to do so, but " boys will 
 be boys," and one falls and breaks his leg ; the other falls, and 
 escapes with a slight bruise. Which of them has been justly 
 treated by nature? Both boys will certainly be more careful 
 in future, but the boy who broke his leg will, perhaps, be, ever 
 after, afraid of high places. This, surely, is an unfortunate 
 result. Courage is a virtue. By over-severity, nature has 
 extinguished the growth of a possible virtue. An infant puts 
 his finger into a candle-flame. Surely, the punishment of 
 hours of pain is too severe. In truth, nature is a very hard 
 task-master, and if we were to follow her example we should 
 often be most unjust. A boy snaps the blade of his knife 
 through carelessness. Let him be punished by going without 
 a knife, Mr Spencer would say. This may be called a natural 
 reaction, but why should I permit nature to inflict it ? I have 
 to consider the boy's motive. What is there that is morally 
 wrong in snapping the blade of his knife through carelessness ?
 
 26O HERBERT SPENCER, 
 
 I should say, regret the incident with him, and give him a 
 shilling to buy another knife. If there is anything wrong in the 
 snapping of the blade, it must have been that he did it purposely, 
 or while using it for some purpose forbidden by you. The wrong 
 then is breach of law imposed by authority. So with a child 
 littering the floor. Punish by making the child set everything in 
 order again, says Mr Spencer. But why punish at all ? There is 
 nothing wrong in littering the floor ; it is a very innocent and 
 very pleasant and seductive amusement. The natural reaction is 
 a disposition to make the litter greater than ever, that the joy 
 may grow with the mess. The wrong exists only if you, the 
 parent, have forbidden it. Here, again then, the wrong is 
 against law as imposed by authority. Mr Spencer has exag- 
 gerated the range and misinterpreted the meaning of nature's 
 reactions. In the whole of moral training it is the motive of 
 the child's act that you have to consider ; other offences due to 
 thoughtlessness or redundancy of animal life must be kept out- 
 side the moral sphere and gently dealt with. 
 
 One of Mr Spencer's punishments shows, in an amusing 
 way, how little he has realized the difficulties of the teacher 
 and parent : "Stop pocket-money," he says. How many boys 
 have any pocket-money to stop ? It is as if you were to pass 
 a law to punish thieves by increasing their income-tax. 
 
 One excellent result, however, it seems, would flow from 
 Mr Spencer's doctrine. He tells us that parents, having to 
 reflect, after a misdemeanour, as to the proper natural reaction 
 applicable to that particular misdemeanour, would learn self- 
 control, and no longer punish impulsively. This is like telling 
 an angry man to count twenty before he speaks. It manifestly 
 assumes that the parent already sees the importance of self- 
 control, and desires and endeavours to exercise it. If he does, 
 the end is gained without the help of the necessity of consider- 
 ing natural reactions. He cannot consider these until he has 
 first controlled himself.
 
 THE MODERN SENSE-REALIST 26l 
 
 I would, in conclusion, point out that Mr Spencer's method 
 is a method of merely negative training in morality ; not a word 
 is said about positive training. Negative training can repress 
 the external exhibition of a vice, while the vice itself may be 
 more deeply rooted than ever. I say there is no positive 
 training to moral ideas, and to a habit of virtue : but with 
 Spencer's moral theory how could there be ? The theory is : 
 Do so-and-so or you will suffer ; you will get the minimum of 
 pleasure and the maximum of pain, and the maximum of pain 
 is vice. Accordingly you cannot train except negatively, if you 
 are to work out this theory consistently. And negative training 
 will produce only negative results. 
 
 I hope that these critical notes have made it clear : (i) that 
 Mr Spencer's ideal aim in education is false : (2) that his 
 standard of morality is false : (3) that his " method " of moral 
 education is nothing save a Rule to help you in selecting a 
 punishment in certain cases ; and that of very restricted appli- 
 cation : (4) that, while there is much sound practical advice 
 scattered throughout the chapter, the whole argument is as 
 confused as it is misleading and pernicious, until he comes to 
 the moral instrument of approbation and disapprobation, as 
 resting on sympathy : (5) that the Spencerian moral training 
 would be exclusively negative and deterrent training, and only 
 incidentally and uncertainly secure the positive results at 
 which the parent and teacher alike aim. For the attainment 
 of this, not for punishing error, we want a method a method 
 which shall have for its aim the true ideal ; for, we are assured 
 by Quintilian and all the wise, that we can reach any height 
 worth reaching only by striving to reach the top of the hill 
 not by sitting down despairingly at the foot of it or building 
 a hut with a good kitchen and comfortable bed one-third of 
 the way up. 
 
 CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY j. AND c. r. CLAY AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
 
 BY THE SAME AUTHOR. 
 
 The Institutes of Education. 2nd ed. 
 
 OLIVER AND BOYD, EDINBURGH. 
 
 Primary Instruction in relation to Education. 6th ed. 
 OLIVER AND BOYD, EDINBURGH. 
 
 Language and Linguistic Method in the School. 
 4th ed. 
 
 OLIVER AND BOYD, EDINBURGH. 
 
 The Training of Teachers and Methods of Instruc- 
 tion. 2nd ed. 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE. 
 
 The Life and Educational Writings of John Amos 
 Comenius. 6th ed. 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE. 
 
 Historical Survey of pre-Christian Education. 2nd ed. 
 LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO., LONDON AND NEW YORK.
 
 University of California 
 
 A N REG '? NAL LIBRAR Y FACILITY 
 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 
 Return this material to the library 
 from which it was borrowed. 
 
 Z WEEK OCT 6 
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 '"" '""
 
 UC80UTHERN REGIONAL