/ff/'Jr -y {'///" // ■> rawt«nMif >/ f,o///tr/ini THE RELATIONS OF EUROPEANS WITH CHINA THESES BY LEWIS S. PALEN AND JESSE H. WILSON, JR CORNELL UNIVERSITY IT 'T AC A, N. Y. 1900 . ■ IICHRY MORSE STCPHCM* 514341 T g ft P T^ T, A T I rT f> OF I T J R P ft! tRtll 7 v o m l gsl r 16 4 0, ™o~- - pj^jc- jtovty BA0H*LOfi op arts tawrxs BTJomm pai-r . // ITHACA, it. Y., 1900. 7 A :•■ OF || I ! I » S S. P A P I I . THE RELATIONS 0>' EUROPEAN VIT*T OUT* HUM SO Ifl . I. .6 D^rolopiaent of the Sari/ Trade with China prior to IteoartxHS assy in 1793 1 ~. The Macartnoy J^nbassy 16 III. the Macartney i&nhassy down to and through J,otd JlMherst'e in 1616 21 T V. From Amherst's Ettbaasy to the Abolitjon of the 3ast India C«qpany*« Monopoly PART II. rpp-r-, T^^fip <* ^--!r»" i p. ;"<;•' r, o 1839 ITS PRINCIPE CAMPAIGNS ARD T ' CTtTS. Page The Evonts which lad It] + o thm Pcrnnl Opening if TT cfltmti**? i 1«*0 32 II, The operations of 1640 48 ITT. The dflflBpftlgn about Canton 54 tmssnm iv. The rbcpedition In the ? T orth and on the Yan£-t so- le! an- 60 . The Treaty of Ran&lng bWSttiior 67 ^ 77. PART t. CHINA P 33. CEAHSB I. THE DJitfELOPKKXT OP 1KB EAFXY TRADE WITH CHINA PRIOR TO I!AGART!tKY»S EMBASSY IT i'1793. In order tc understand the relations of Euroi>eans with China during; the deoade following the abolition of the East India Conprur/'s monopoly of the trade with China in 1833, it is imperative that an account should be given of the relations of Europeans prior to that year. It is , therefore, the purpose in the first pages of this thesis to trace "briefly the history of the opening of the Chinese trade and of its prosecution through the varying vicissitudes of a trifle over two hundred rs. For it must he remembered that the history of the trade from the appearance of the Portuguese in 15 16 to the abolition of the Company's charter in 1833 is the history of China 5 s intercourse with Europeans and European powers. The est orders went there to trade. J&ctensien of rheir commerce impelled them to run the risks they did. whatever fighting they did arose out of trade complications or out of difficulties between two otf the European powers at home, with which we have little con- cern. Any embassies or official communications received by or sent from the Chinese court that may be said to have approached the dignity of international relations, as we know them in this day, invariably had their origin in a desire for some regulation of the trade • On the other hand, it is not, fortunately, necessary to give time to the consideration of various historical problems which connect themselves with the earlier periods of this great empire's life. Such a study would doubtlessly prove in- teresting and profitable, but it would contribute little to a better understanding of China's Kuroppan relations during a part of the present century. .Tot until lg?4 do we get any facts which in any way foreshadow or foretell what the future dealing between China and the Europeans may be. In that year two nohle Venetians, Hicolo and Matteo Polo by name, who a few years earlier had mad© a journey to China by way of the land rou»e from the Ked.it err anean, returned to the court of the great Cablai Khan, bringing with then young Marco Polo, the son of Hicolo. Karco served the Chinese government j. n various capaci- ties for seventeen years. Then in the last decade of the eighteenth century he returned to Venice with such stories of the vast wealth Mil resources of the Chinese Snpire that he soon won for himself the name of "Messer Karoo Millione" be- cause of his frequent use of that niimeral. But however dis- credited his tales of travel and adventure may have been in his own day, his careful record of them allows scholars of to- day to attest their truth. His horde of precious stones and jewelB hidden in the linings fcf his tattered clothes probably 3 constituted the first consignment of Chinese goods whioh any European had "brought directly from the far east, Whatever Chinese goods may have o erne i; to Bur ope before this time must hare passed through the Egyptian or Byzantine entrepots. / Sir John F. Davis in hie excellent work on China, from which the matter of this introduction has hean chiefly drawn, sgcys: "Abundant evidence is afforded "by Chinese records that a much more liberal as well as enterprising deposition once ex- isted, in respect to foreign commerce, than has prevailed since. Ml) This gives us a clue to use in searching for reasons of the later and present unwillingness on t 1 rt of the Chinese to allow unrestricted trade with foreigners. T)\xr4> ing the last part of the thirteenth century, Chinese junks were seen as far west as the Malabar coast of India. And the records show tlui back in the seventeenth century several missions were dispatched to neighboring countries to encourage and build up trade and that the benefits of trade and industry were extolled throughout the Empire. What a change in feeling Lord Macartney and Lord Amherst found in 1793 and 16161 As the reason for this change Davis assigns the conquest ©f nchow Tartars in 1644 and their subsequent influence. Their l fear of the evil effects of increased knowledge on the stabil- ity o* their dominions led to their contempt for Europeans. (2) The first Europeans to establish themselves in China were (1) Davie, I., 11. (a) Davis, I., 11. 4 the Portuguese* TTnder the direction of Prince Henry the Navigator they had slowly worked their way down the western coast of Africa, Then in 1498, although the promoter of the great enterprise had died a3.most forty years before, Vasco da < Gama discovered the direct sea route to India round the Cape of Good Hope. The Portuguese ^irst appeared at Canton In 1516. Rafael Perestrello in that yer conducted the first ship to sail to Chin*, undor a JJuropean flag.(l) IXiring the next few years, under the direction of Ferdinand "Partus do Andr&da, their conduct won for them the confidence and favor of tfi Inese authorities, (2) ' With .Andrada sailed one Thome Vires, who had been entrus- ted "by the governor of the Portuguese establishment at Ooa wit>^ an embassy to the imperial court at Peking. Its object was to secure trading concessions for the Portuguese at Canton as well as Maooa. The prophet jc spirit of this, the first of it lonr* list of embassies that have gore to the Chinese court at Peking, Justifies a somewhat detailed account of its treatment. Pires, en his arrival at Peking, found the court influenced against him by a subject of the Suit cca, whe complained against the action of the Portuguese in forcibly seising the city of that name. Then the Chinese, moved probab- ly by the outrageous conduct of Simon Andrada, who had caiite overturned the good reputation established by his brother, (1) Danvers, 200; Williams, 432. (2) Davis, X., 12. 5 questioned tho validity of the embassy and detained Pires at Canton until 1525, when the:* killed him. This failure to ob- tain any of the important points of negotiation for which tho assy had been sent marks the attempts of most of its succes- sors, whether from Portugal or from any other TJuropean power. (D The general deportment of tho Portuguese fo»- the next few ra aroused suspicion of all JSuropeane in the minds o , who oame to knew the foreigners as men seeking wealth and earing little how they got it. In 1545 the Bane Virion And i had first, aroused the hostile feelings of tl Chinese established a fort at Shang-ch'wan, near Macao, wit: out the permission of -H.ceroy of Canton; and from there he pillaged commerce and captured Chinese subjects for Blares. The Chinese retaliated by driving the Portuguese from their ooaetsinstead of opening their ports to European trade as they *e about to do when Simon Andrada arrived. :\\t later, by the exercise of that power to win favor with the Chinese, in whieh the Portuguese showed themselves at all times superior tc V other nations of !5urope f they secured possession of the island of Macao and there btiilt up a permanent trading p^st. The authorities disagree ae to the ownership of this island and as to the way in which the Portuguese gained the controlling interest there. Staunton(l), Panvers(2) r?,r\A the Rev. George Smith A assert, that ? 'acao was given the Portuguese in return for l* (1) Staunton, (2) Panvers, (3) Smith, 6&. 6 for valuable servicer; against the marauding pirates who preyed upon the Chinese coast. Davis sjqcs that this commonly accepted view of the case is erroneous. Ke points out that the BJsh< of Nacao virote, in lft$j thai it was "by paying a ground-rent that the Portuguese acquired the temporary use and profit of Macao ad nutum of the emperor. n Davis seems to have made t!i refill research into the matter(l), while all the others have -vidently copied the statement of some earlier fcthcrity which was Made without a perfect knowledge of the facts. For some years after 158*? the tradeof tl o Portuguese with flourish^. t later it gradually fell away until d almost entirely died ettt at the beginning 0fi the present century. During the period from 1516 tc 1753 the Portuguese \/6ent to the court at Peking four embassies, count ir t of Pir . "hey ne«>d little attention and will bear of but trifling distinction because of the similarity cf their treatment ar results; for they all "exhibit the usual spectacle of arrogance the one side and profitless submission on the other. "(2) Such was, in brief, the course cf the discovert first promoters of Chinese trade. Yet contemporaneous with the Portu- guese in China were three other European nations whose early relation* well now be briefly sketched. It has seemed best, however, to treat the whol period of each c< e separately and to lead up finally to the "English relations after the year (1) Davis, I., 18. (2) Davis, I., 20. 7 1833 will fom the body of this thesis. To the Spanish little space need be given. They had the right of trading to Macao indiscriminately with the Portuguese. The privileges of Canton and Amoy were also open to them. Yet because of their shortsightedness in restricting the number of ships to be engaged in the Chinese trade and because of their failure to take advantage of the facilities offered by their possessions in the Philippines, they have been of little moment in the eastern tKade(l). The Butch, on the other hand, though of but little more import ince from the standpoint of mere trade with China f deserve somewhat more careful study in their character of rivals and competitors of the English in eastern seas. As early as ln24 the Dutch formed a settlement on the western ooast of Formosa and also oco.npied the Pescadores, a group of small islands lying between Formosa and the mainland. Liberty of com- merce with China was at first denied, but later granted on condition the Dutch would ev .cu vte the Pescadores. Port Zealand in Formosa was built some years later. The capture of Fort Zealand in 1#6£ by Koshinca, the son of the recently dethroned Tartar emperor, and the expulsion of the Butch from the island soon out short the desultory and irregular trade with China and forced the Dutch to return to Java >.nd Batavia, to their taade in spices. A later attempt from Batavia to take Fort (1) Davis, I., 26. d failed(l). Then in 1664 Van ^Toorn was sent as a envoy U Peking tc petition the government for t concessions and fc ~mis- si on to erec + factories at certain cities on the coast. mission proved absolutely fruitless, even f arc 14.1 j for the r gained nought for his efforts save his own ltanlllatien(2) • Yet Juet one hundred fifty years Inter they ntlrely forgotten the leescai of ^ T rn 's Llure by pure sub- ; prostrating ceremonies ef the court 1- n the comn*refctl admrntegee they desired. TheSr hopes vtor* '. ered and V ;«n- in 179f>, after obsequiously submitting x o their demands and Doing subjected to barbarious hurdlation in return, left Peking without having attained a slng3 e object of his mission. (r>) During t) ' irorin between mission? the Dutch had been chiefly engaged in their trade the is] and their irregular fighting with the East India Company's ships, so that in i ineso trade pro] were of but minor 1 njnr t anc e . ( A ) Before turning to the IRnglish trade during this earlier period, a moment's consideration should be given to Russ5 . The prcsen-.-d^.y intere, t felt in the outcome of ia's grow- ing influence in northern China justifies a search for the cause el t almost hypnotic sway which Ruse! a seems to have 1) Davis, I., 31. (2) Williams, II., 442. (3) 4) Williams, II., 4^3. n always possessed over the authorities at Peking. Their trade itself, being carried on by the overland instead of the sea route, did not associate them with the Europeans and thoir troubles alone the sea coast of China, hut rather offered then an opportunity to penetrate almost unobserved into the northern and we; --tern provinces and to wjn a gradual, seni -unconscious hold upon the poople of those districts. This means of approach, avo ' as it did the clash which the sudden appearance of un- sing HarcpeaM off Canotn and the coast provinces ro- duccol, rather separated the Russians from the class of the ns and gained for their emhfQ^siss to Peking a degree of respect seldom show* to foreigners. Davis says their envoys in 1 " nd 1J%$ lly cordial receptions, "demonstrative pf the estj mat J. on in which the power of Russia a treaty of 1727 the Russians were granted the of establishing a church and college of prieste at Peking and of keeping four young "Russians at the capital to study t" and act as interpreters. (1) the Idle of the present cent* lay continued this quiet trading p being seldom if ever considered as possible rivals to their more westerly brethem. Yet in this lonr; established friendly latejpeourt ■■•, protected by its 1s<" 'he omfcnr plots of rival traders, seem to lie "cundations of that firmer structure which Russia has been steadily build- (1) Davie, T. . 10 ing in upper China. Its threatened completion forms England'* mo si puzasling eastern pj'5»l§n of to-day. (1) t wh%t Russia and what all the other nations trading with China accomplished or suffered is of importance tc our theme only in so far as it has touched English affairs or has served, by way of il lust rat 5 on, to throw light upon intricate Chinese customs methods otherwise incor risible. Of course, the English had to learn the5r lesson? from experience just as the others did, hut their ultimate success crr.r arc? above that of anjr other nationality tKading in the east may have been partly due to t^eir observation and correction of fche errors made by their competitors. It was in 1^37 that Capt. Weddell, with a fleet of four shirs, succeeded in opening: the first. trMlag relatione be- tween the English and Chinese. Arrived off Maoao c 21 , he sailed up the riynr to Cantor, and requested the mandarins to allow him to take cargoes fr.r his ships. The mandari: poisoned by the Portuguese tales against the English, refrained from answering until they could fort oaatls en J Hi *-iver bank. The Bnglish retaliated for an unprovoked bombardment of their vessels by capturing the fort and demanding an explana- tion. The mandarins cringed before them and flowed th in load. (2) A second attempt to establish commercial intercourse with Canton failed beoause of the exorbitant port charges (1) Davis, I., 32. (*) Davis, I., 34. 11 Lolals proposed to l«Ty upon ^higlish vessels, a the Joalotis plotting of the Portuguese w^s supposed to instrumental in the 1 r failure* on In 1670 trade was opened KosMagft after he k driven 13 toh fron Formosa only eight years before. This Formes trade, however, Mref prov • of i table to w : . its continuance and in X661 the fac *awn. * r entitirr- suoh f A been brou o India 16?? f -v doniranilit;. y as fl tradi port thai Sir .Tosiah Ch rdorod a factor tafcllshod Mi ere t fel is aim I discontinued in \noy was aid and cent:' nuod to flourish lone after Canton hud Mccone hi el }5ngll*h j -.(1) all attempts ocurc a footing at M&eftO wore sod with "stupid pertinacity ■ Portugese* TTnder their tutelage Vr , or chief commissioner of customs, imp o sod such enormous p.nrt. charges on the Sngllsh ships thai ut a successful damper en all V-e J^ast India Company's trade wi Ch> i last decade if sovon J b century. (£) f the first, sevent}' years of fcho eighteenth century is narked toy little of importance other than the re- tompta by the Tnglish to secure the reduction of these on and to huild v,p trade in other ports where such exor- bitance would not he met with. The Indian tmd eastern ■ (1) Williams, II. f 448. (2) Davis, I. # 38. quarrels of the ^English and Fi timing the l« fcer h If of this period only aggravated Kite troubles of the &fi nd ropeans in the estimation of the Chinese. (1) ■jmer of deal" :lishmen necane intolerable. . Flint, who wj : .s colleague Mr. F^rrison bad sought to see tc trading ooneeseioi ittf£P*i was seized "by the man- Imprisoned for tare yn id finally n hoard ship inc'den" ' . * s arrogant and dM ■ 4 -ful in the e; . (arable treatment at the became on-? of tfc« Ohief re eons fe ' di;-/ to the eourt at Peking. n is tfcrcw '" •■■ Chinese in i '-■■.>-*- Le injustices against re by learning ndai'iontal I verniy- lir intercourse wltlJ \* . A faith* rattalatten runs: "The barbari re a "beasts and are nc ruled on the ease principle as e it 1 sens. one ti attempt controlling '" " ;reat f reason it would 1 nothing hut. eenfaslen. The ano kings well understood this, ind accordingly ruled bar- by misru! -of ore to rule barbarians by mi Brule is host | them. "(2) ftlt of this theory of Justice and eut of the fact Is assisted the Chinese in ataimisteris (1) Davis, X., It, (2) X>avls t I., 54» 13 tioo gre-v- may atrocious i,uniyhrienta for homicide* purely accidental or wholly excusable ?>ut one ©xanplo need bn c*ven ant. because its grose injuatioe prev coming enl assy to Poking. e "Gunner's Case 11 arose In 1?S4« A cunner, firing i 8 wltl tally killed a Chi?-, arc an. ^ho • ^? was " '>ly sei gad and retained ner wai . Tn §pitt his purr hhat no han come to hi (ftgNnw *a decision had been r od, the eh soon found on jltd. 1 inai "'shrian Buffering death in this v y and it sh plainly t v need of some Int.f- I onal ont . (1) "ore dealin HalHUfay iltii " as if. pre unfr .t.e ©rent, it In o define fe] terns "sivnercarcn", Wtitd Id iii« pre- cedar '^raph, "Hone 3^erc}-rnl s" and "select c orani 1 1 < .■ ", all of T h ~ r fro 'OUghti 3 f o"^ lisr • . Th> o of a rata 111 Vi sent tuft by ttia owners or of aha *Mp tc .tend to the ship's tmafttaas ar- its - thai- le to say, to sel.l th* cargo s.n& purchase a Wtm p* At fir si • men were od 3h i n e s o o f f i a 1 al I tor m i iin In' C an t on for o n l - i n (1) Davit, I., 5 r >. 14 riods of t- .r, "but 1 tm permitted I nahlt. themselves in thci; cry for tin year round, spondir sir ,il- rtMllt J of those mm for selsure as hostages for the reparation of alleged injuries, on , , fey 'lni: down to 'Tar. Canton, en the >r, , ' thei : ! .nt tm in the trouble* incident to n « yrc the fc cor.i I r carry on .rade in tho mime of the Or ttd to d Chinese of Is in a representative eapa- . Tho nen w< J A oft cue nt. to contend wit3 ore the r, n . ~o these few Chinese m e rch ants J lecti',1 nt gave lualre privilege of dealing with til t. "hrough V .uission nerchants all the bttftl* ' I J.ng had to pass. By virtue of their ahso- to gnur 1 id gen r did impose exorbitant pon t: see Euro. . A supposedly cu ning device 'oh they used to employ - t" \t stoppj 'rade - proved trous when thev found their opponents wielding their own weapon with much more t •TnT^eror for ^^^ [r* Tfi^fir? t Vfii owinp such an expression of farejp by their ruler earn* inn bio privileges fron the peepl« . \3Pi --"■\r<\ Lord Macartney received (1) Staunton, III., 22. (2) Staunton, III., 19 thfl the viceroy of Canton, who hae cherish hostility for the S&lgli , 1 removed ,(1) only other important occurrence at fche oourt v^as the ex- tents an. i expression* "_ felt nonarohs. Businoc out of Ml, 7or ho " } »o from time to time checlced , in conversation ■ s5 diary in cc os. s of jealr- ptility dM Lord savr it v/ ■ ' • try to 0Yoto« i ,( left Pe v fore, id : f the K of I en* Their hepe of gaining iim or ir ding P«rt« t \ HJteil tfc« friendly of ... 1 communi n to l »{3j in It occurs ' emert strictly 1 Smiting the I ' ons to the port of Canton. ftxdgoft by the treats* ions, thll one ef Lord Kacartriey'r 13 ' ' rly cs ■ f 1 '!, lie ■*■ ' " , I I 'St "be ■enounced iv • H re* J of one officer hostile to t" I es f s rust be (1) Staunton, III., 14 . (2) Staunton, III., l 44 - ( 3 ) Bt aunt on f III., l« r > 1 . 20 hel nlj definite concession granted hy the emperor, anonc ^-1 tho embassies to the Chinese court frier to 18r>3 it standi noot ■■■ r ry. It served one * th- CO of 1 ' ( " Peking court of its imros, ihilit&e^ . v u A J i » 1J. J. • DOWH 181 ft. The peri od eaverinpi few jcnth century and the first f ourte- n of the present was os^c of cc - paratlve tranquility. In 180n t i to cut the cable of the Providence were injured b; ' crew, the Cannon officials fcnad r unwarra nted demands sternly met and they allowed the matter to blow over. A few years later the troubles "between SSngland a \ance were, usual, carried, out into ttu fcera seas. A fleet of $ i- defeat ft rench fleet which pany's ships, in 1805, had heen cruisfcng above the straits for the purpose of capturing R] from Canton, otiv- of the piratee between %9Q& %81 led te tfc oh ef two of the Company's ships in+e Ike Chinese - , w&5 ult, imatel* r did more ^ood. b ,r making a careful curve*"" of neighboring seas than by any service against the pirates. (1) In 1814, however, t> rri r>& at calm was foil a rm. The high-handed act ion ef the 8antc provoked, the English beyond all endur Court (1) Davis, I., 71. 2.2 of directors tc i etition once more for an English embassy to the imperial court to seek redress for thier grievances. (1) ITo one could fail to recognize the neod for some commercial tre or defined relations of cone kind to take En : th ina out to field of chance. The Canton officii A he on violated in the 1 * i I the T>nris ". ' mdtti "cercy th ' their In no i I war, ~ r.ed to recocr.' of authority bogan aari vrerr. s*(Z) "•-"• seised v^oef?, , retail tad ago' ■ of o; "by step - . j>. Then t lang ion in remo ar toy of nafcian * } rej^ clearly rtanc^ of de to V d province Canton. (3) In addition to oris affair the .tion of ] ■? 'he m rch nte '.ed to rf or- enco b; m g emperor should issue a jmbi ic proclamation promising that &ny Chinese ambassador visiting England would form the "ko-te aiglish soverel, . :, as in 17^3, the emperor finally consented to receive them in the manner of the- ish court . (1) i.ord Amherst was hurried into Peking • e&rly in the morning, while greatly fatigued jid unprepared to appear at court, ordered to present himself to the emperor. (2) On offering hi;j ill health and vn- preparedness as an excus< , ■ - was roughly handled by the court officials and shortly afterward hustled out of Peking as had come in. (3) Nothing had to«B accomplished save perhaps the acquisition of mere knowledge regarding the Chinese court. One or two gen- observations HOftt be made. Through out thw whole journey to and from Peking the attitude of the officers and people toward the embassy was markedly more unfriendly than it wae in Lord Macartney's case and showed a great desire to hurry them out of the country as rapidly as possible. The dealings with (? as, 95. {%) Ellis, |1N . (3) KUU, 18*. 2i> mandarins and court officers revealed frequent offences against the absolute truth and uncovered many of the courts contemp- tible methods of diplomacy* And lastly, both Davis and Kills give it as their opinions that the real cause of the failure ■nbassy wata prolyl to the secret hostility of the mousse an Canton effiolaXft* xhe viceroy, ist whose treatment of i .-iglish since 1814 it was one of the purposes of the embassy to complain, did his utmost to poison the m - per or his court gainst the Jftiglish* CHAPTER IV. FROM AMHERST 1 ■* WBM0R TO THE ABOUT .1 ;." # "This unsuccessful mission" cf Lord Arahorst "was followed >y a longer interval of tranquility cu eedom fron Chinese loyance thaji had ever been experienced befGre."(l) From 161 ;o 1829 the British trade was stopped -rnlslK. their oa) *# of Then in ■ of the foils .r, an I' ,ilor on bourd an American ship ace ese woman, m i ...i ■ ■ i. m .1. n . i n . . ■■ ... n ..,.. ... — — — ■■«» (1) Davie, I., £9. (2) Davis, I., 90- 27 trading alongside the vessel, and was surrendered for trial. After a secret trial, absolutely contrary o their pledged word, the officials causae to be ftrrfrflllfi and they r< ~ ported to Peking tha* the American consul had witnessed, the Btttlen. »!ncov >is e> ion r mess, Chinese c . iittl- L* in the *Sft* M affair 1 *. In January and Vebruary Sf IMA the select com- mittee were forced to resort to stopping the trade for six weeks until the Canton off i civile recognized the division of authority and responsibility between the officers ttf Majesty's ships and the servants of the Company ad exonerated >mmittee from al ^responsibility in the matter. An English court martial acquitted the Topaze's lieutenant for repelling the attack of reus Chine so upon the sailors of his crew who were engaged in retting r. These findings were accepted by the Chinese and practically settled the affair. (1) j)uring this decade was worked out an important change in the purely commercial relations of t3 r chants at Canton, ihe failure of some of the Hon*-; merchant* led to a governmental regulation freeing the Consoo or corporate body of merchants from liability for the debts of individual members. This measure stopped the unhealthy aretes of credit upon which the trade be- tween the 35nr;ii 8 h and Hong merchants had been baeed. Vvrther- mr>r&i the reduction of the number of Hon^ merchants to six as (1) T>vi i. f Ql 4 a coneequaaee of these failures greatly inconvenienced the English and rendered the remaining half y.ozon merchants even dictatorial than t3 body, while still in' c , had ■m. This fti '■ . ■ •* e oomit.i ships re detained en ntil t Jtdi o. ) i ^it- Id be net. They asked that the number ©: aits bo increased, that the heavy port charges on ships trading at , ... , some oheefe aced upon the govern) tent officers eeted with the customs. Tip on a ifXanitlea viceroy in March , 1830, that three new Konp: merchants would he cr- and that the subject art Ml had been referred to rcperor, the committee r> - rted t.he trade. (1) That same year the Chinese o; Is made most strenu ejections to reside. f foreign women in IfB and ordered that in th ure they he confined to Macao. Later in the season grievous trouble ej arose at the Canfc ton factory, Just because the Knglsih made a little park out of some waste ground in front of their factory and built, for -•rmelves a pier into the river, the Fooyuen or vieero; * s deputy of Canton openly invaded factory and demanded an Ian at i en of the acts contrary to the viceroy* s orders. With an imperial sanction of the yocyuen's measures and an unsatis- factory attempt by V ■■<-. committee to secure redress, the matter (1) Davis, I., 96. was allowed to rest .(1) An< bon ' . sele&t committee tineu. in a "s to becoae the culminating griev Lng the} I ^es • In J82 Is i Hie it i,c^o by the exact ion a of t n -tugueso to .-.ntin, situated opium ruled as kin, over all* The m, ndarins connived the emuc- hinoso subjects were killed from the opin ps with no 03 -fic- tion given the venal officials them- selves. The trade, tgh wholly outside the . .elect committee, flourii increas a such an e. as to implant in that body a belief I the whole eas •uld quite as read! nd itself t;c a smuggling trade in staple merchandise. Aeeerdingly, 1 out the IV Amherst. , en a surreptitious trade with forbidden ports along the northern part c.f the coast. As was always the caso the people themselves appeared Willis nut rietiene , "but their wiliingnes ilea noth- igtl against the opposition of the mandarine, whjc used he lure of this most questionable venture, (ii) The expedition (1) T)aTis, I., 105. (2) Davis, I., 306. 30 had two c : it elicited severe criticism of the seloc t md and it demonstrated "beyond the securing imperial con* for trad I cities alon^ the coast. (3j equent violent &ffr Ltnttn marked lis'.' . -.ff irs in Chj o^ the Ifftft Xn4i* 8efl$4 ve way to nts. Jtoftt %wt hundred years ho- ; mo the (* f ww pa ■ ""• ■f"rad^ T ^ fT tfr^th Hh^ . ~ow "by the • 'a monopoly was abolished. This ..td well '-lers into the east v fth#r teglish tr --ders and consequently " ; BtM&ttieil of 1' itself. In the l committee was to ie a b I title Jnveived securing the nMrgmiai ■* -cr privileges the Com; had heretofore wrci ' C««»l hren^fe its e Mdliuu of a seljot c . ) (1) Deris, I.| 103. (2) Davis, I., 110, Such fsfcrjuent mention is mado time the follwoing pages of the places In tttti the Canton River as to require at le . "brief toseri] of that 'Li strict v/here the b trade Mid its es . The olty of Canton If on the nor ae of bh* river it seventy-five miles £ru . i . • Just t* and east of / is the .where the foreign sliip- ig lies. i the river tunas in a southwesterly in and j'Ioyjs through a narr amiel ca. ogue, ris or Tiger's 3£©ut: , which leads itself verv readily to defenoe "by the shore "batteries and forts lining e side. >oca Tigris the river wider of ab< sntj — f ive miles at its mout^. Just off the point cf southern shore lies the ;uese island of Kacao, while g occupies the same t lit ion on t way "between these %vm tmd a short nee up $h$ river lies Lintin, the little island so famous from its connection vith pium smugglers and their forbidden trade. PART - WAR OF 1340-184;}: ITS PKIHCIPAL CAKPAIG h CHAPTER I . 8 WTIC7F LED UP TO no tokmai opjttt— o- a&smxfrts tt imo, , • , E*«rd api«r -j ved at Canton as "Chief o Majesty's subjects with 1 .. . OSfl ioi^l ai>p ointments of Sir eorgt . as second ana bhird super- . [l! a his arrival U»e Canton oificials refused to tra mwd t hi Mttfc fei Um in er.u,l court and ordered until iiibsicriers should leave the rd Kapler *tftar ucloi rained i:rotests reluctantly retired tA , onlj c e disease which brought his ml 0a in less than three months after he teal bailed up U. #ris.(2) Sir Johii Davis »u«ceedea Lord ITapier for a brief term. An L edict . blame i'or the troubles of Jul:* anc , 1834, one merchants secured a short period tfUiuil Ad unuistu. intercourse between the traders of tha 1 ;.U>) following Sir John Davis, the administration of Sir George ... t in 18oo m proved quite as peaceful as that of (I! b, I., 113. (2) Davis, T., 120. (:5) 13 rls, T ., 123. 33 his predecessor. But a change began to he felt by the time Capt. Charles Elliot assumed the duties of chief superintendent in |A59* Little by little the old troubles incident to the opium tr^de had been aggravated and brought i ly to ctice eminc eh the government had now assumed. In respooc io j mt's att-ituat), Uapt. Sllio : ' jj Issasnse, tist be | 14 the raoj-'t unfortunate, increase of the si during the last fo-jr years , the rapia growth in the east coast in opium, and the continued drain of the silver, have no doubt greatly a? armed, the government. "(1) Opium si thee© years became so bold as to carry of their trade ri& inside t ;gris, xn the very mXt ship— ping. 3"*ut the worst of all the complications at on this smuggling trade arose o> i perfidious double dealing hy the government officials themselves. Vh- m received a royalty on orery ^hest passed in. Bven those in chargeof the war funics under orders to drive away the smugglers' ships ac- cepted bribes f PSSJ daring traders and rendered back false reports to the government . iz) Whenever the central authorities did mete out punishment to any of the natives found one in the proscribed traffic, the punishment was most severe. And all this time the Canton officials were making inter mi .ten" demands upon the recognized >]nglish merchants ana the sujperin- vis, r. y . (2) Pavis, I., ISO, 1~1. 34 tendent for the arrest and delivery of English smue#lars. Their .ilure to recognize tho fact that the snug^lere worked at n rink and were neither amenable to nor under the pro- •tion of the superintendent, led to great oonfm mis- . aline, 'sh bourco of discomfiture, much embarBaoB- ,-.; marohantf fee the uur#j emeu. . ra* waa i'inall;- r td by allowing tfca Co*Bang t#a year* in xhe matter, r, was finally adjusted by t atea the War of (fttOHfe, wherein the emperor bound himeel: fraat »00 debt or the Coin] , -onceBsions ed in order to preserve the i . And since, tional, the i\iffer@v< .g on j.t rei i not into consideration by j inese, leniency of previous years waB ex$>ecte< . W% after -ill, • griev noes;? anu Lcultiai played onl. dnor ] in preeipiat ig«g the war which ended with the tty fcf Nanking • Around the opium trade oenteree im- aodi -t,te causes of tho necessity for armeu intervention on the (Dp . t., i :a„ (a) to* . a i, - (3) Bingham, I., 2. part of Um hone p;overnmen1 . J of review of the develc - mn- itself will tend to elucidate somewhat the foil j-agr&phs dealing he troubles just prJcr to the war. Oj . m coming into Chin -. lust f t the ei century . (1) In 1994 an opium ship, I »y pium p03 at Lai. .. , moved up to VJbumpoq, whorv the trade thrived until 1&1&. As t irly as 1798 the C3 l«« nes trade and in 1820 a prchib- ion co increased vigilance of compel the c, ^ealers to moke the Island of Lint in, in the mou- ... Chinese aomiralo offlel .. , under bribes of from j ir to, per chest, readil: set the laws at defiance and ?g Buffered the trade to he quietly prosecuted, with only rupticns, until th« reak of u ler, 1837. During thi . • > > ; worth cf opium was im- port , - rn, a large exportation of siiv<- , since at this time the Chinese die not have sufficient experts with i to pa^' for tl ^ds brought ir • kingdom. Most cf this silver, however, had been in earlier years for teas and in balaneiu- Uq orts had • ■ . he Chinese would punch silver out of every coin passing through their hands a: gopr .ed coins BtftM finally be collected and c< ed into silver bars known cts "Syoco silver ".(a) (1) Bingham, I., 4. (2) Bingham, 1., 11. 36 Binghau, who se< have had the oppo nolination to examine into r of 1. — , st tee J as his opinion that "the oo^in-; out of sycoe silver fro; -n- .1 flowery land" was th« .»so o_ Chineso oition to %m trade, and any roi oe mor tve had against >ut a small part in influenoin ir ao towaj . ,,; . The willin - ness of tht ciiJts to aonnlve la Miggl and eagerness -die nacl lewei -ses to secure it *.d tend 10 support this view. Unfortunately, the; o» is torn - amo. inese £ov«rnnient officials of composing edicts fc mere jAippose of "savinn their faces** with tbo emperor renders, the highly ; tirades against o; absolutely worthless fnr h-ili-int'; t« a decision in this matter. 3o that all we kno liinese gri rtperor and some of his off icials -opposed the opium tracie on • two grounds rt ntioned ahove f, ore wished to stoj at nton shared w emperor and some tais it officers a dislike f< eigners, and hence ti wished to harass arid huiribl i&iglish ant on in QYQry possible w--.y. *#hile seekirs -ry out their designs they o reckon with their host. In , in reply Is advocating a auty on opium and also requesting; the prohibition of the drug, ; • emperor issued an edict to his high officers at Canton, ordering them 37 to seize all native dealers in the drug, the Hone merchants, "brokers, boatmen and the naval officers and militia who 1 received "bribes. (!) Tang, the admiral, took adavntage of thin edict to monopolize the trade and thus secure a f. "before the fi lei 1 t$*a&« i: rse, "■paved his face" by §* ,ise report to kfee lllljiHI i . or, in t , "by reviving an olu ouiet forbid-- ding continued resiaenoe o -ton, ho forced the foreigners . ear Chinese edicts o acta and ad all foreign ships to leave the east ooast anu ordered the receiving ships at %*hampoa to drop down to Macao, on pain of destruction jjf fee order was not carried out. iring the following year great embarrassments were im- posed upon the trade and tJ izjtre of the opium began. In re of this, however, the bold smugglers built up an open and mdlsguished trade right at whampoa.(^) i'he change m coming. In December, Ittftj occurred the first ev«nt that f ormed one of iiot's specific grou; sequent radical v.ction. ,1 officials at Canton chose the square in front of the Hiuropean quarters as tfc* the execution of a native opium do ale , .ag was struck the momoiv crowd d. Ihe rabble became aggravated at the foreigners' in- terference with theiijpieasure and re. ,ed by mobbing the factories and houses. Jhey were di&per&oa after two hours b; >"..?.'". ( ) Bin 38 native police. This unfortunate affair preceded, by a few days, an act of Capt. J&liot's which many of his critics have considered mere detrimental to the Ifriglish interests than any at gone be?e*Hb ^pace will B n into the felly of Capt. ^lliGt's Measure, tfhile chief super- intent . a an elaborate thesis in it- o faoto may be mentioned . Desirous of assisting i Chinese xn .u.1 legitimate attempts at suppressing the traf- , he on. 1 English ships oarrying opium to proceed outside t oca ligrio at the same time warned of the retribution which would follow the killing of any native ring the prosecution of this trade. This authority to drive ships beyond iferis, it is urged, implied the authority to euppress the trade entirely, whereas supi res* si on was I QHJoi ill impossible by the constant demand. (1) Purine January t 1359, feelin n ran high, 'she Chinese proposed that no vessel be allowed to trade during the following season until its master should sign a bond declaring the vessel had no opium aboard and agreeing, if any were found, confiscation of the vessfca and to the iuent aous fines. (<;) On February 86 anot: tive ium dealer was strangled on the square in front of the tac- tories, without, any regard whatever for Capt. >;iliot*s protests and remonstrances. (5) On : arch 1<\ ijin t the governor of Hu- (1; iBingEam, I. t *"3"S7T2) Bingham, I,, 5dTT37TIngham, I., 46. 39 kwang, who had been anointed special commissioner to invetti- ga I affairs of the seaports of Kwang-tung, arrived at ton. One of his first official acts was to issue an edict forbidding for* i^ners to gr acao; this Mftf followed by a second, ordering all slips to give bonds that thej'- had no opium thernore, all opium in the port was ordered to be deliver ed np within three days, and on the third day the lives of ong merchants were to be threatened if the opium was not 1Mb* ly surrendered. The Tlurcpeans allowed sjT'pat" merchants to influence and they assisted in gather* chests. Commissioner Lin expressed dissatisfaction at number of chests offered and showed great anger when in- formed that :ir. Dent, who then had charge of the trade at Can- , refused to venture into the tity to answer the summons so; i. On Kar#i , '"'apt. Klliot issued a circular from Facac stating that all confidence in the local government had ceased. •d himself to Canton, hoisted tfet flag over the factories and ordered up the fleet to help in any trouble that might result. (1) Troif le did follow, in which neither the fleet nor any other protect ken by the Europeans were of ?jiy avail. By order of Commissioner Lin all the passages to the factories were closed by coolies, the river blocked t. a tri.}- rrion of boats, soldiers stationed en the roofs of (1) Bingham, | M 61. 40 .ses surrounding tin iV.ctory buildings and all the n servants of :h.e European made to abandon th ir masters. With * food supply also cut «ff| ■ inmates of the facta re -ecaricu alt ion. (1) Under these t oirctu - the stancep. •' . tliot is; i notice "1 En.^lishnon in^Can- ton Ri^e.', s the immediate delivery of all t' th- owned opium would alone procure for the :>irc; their freedom ako a renewal of trade possible. Fe called for a Lng to hold himself r« ible for fell committed to him before six o 1 c|oc?< that day. (2) The •sit ion and showed itatemen s, accompanying what little was actually sent. In dui I , tl they held at that ti river and on ships en route from India, Arrange- delivery of the opium to Lin provided fmt gfrndual restoration of trade and parsosal privilege; confiscated iter* b iheultf 1 . . ri son- men t of ns, 1 '0 of the Commissioner sub- mitted to the Jiiglish in the factory a bond similar I or to tho former ones mentioned above and sought by threat* and coercion to secure its ucc- signature. It ■ - Capt. nend away all empty receiving ships and to petition the kinc to eoinmand all his subjects "tremblingly w to obey the laws of empire forbidding ■ and (1) fl ja yft i — i I., 63. (2) Bingham, I., fl . 41 importation of the dru£. Lin* 6 relentless efforts accomplished M thing .By Ma&r 81, the whole number of 20 f 283 chests had been surrendered, so that Capt • Elliot and the ether British su~ - jeots finally secure^ r freedom on Baa; 2«1-, after seven weeks detention in the factory buildings at Canton. Merchants who hart been trading in opium were required tc puit the country and give bonds never to return. In Juno Commissioner Lin des- troyed the surrendered opium. Because of the threatenir 1- a of off lev, Is and natives at Canton, the British stepped at Hon uidtrn as shipped their goods to American vessels transportation at Canton. In July, Cn.pt. Elliot appealed to Lin to reaiaiV this Levoua state of affairs by carrying out the provisionn of the agreement entered upon when the surrender of thfcoyitas was pr« . it at this time, howev n, kOtther of those unfor- tunate homeide affairs complicated the relations between the officials. The accidental death of a Chinaman named Lin Weihe in : .bbi e some American and English sailers ifl| brcught dotal upon Capt. Elliot the usual demands for the surrender of the murderer to Chine m and practically de- .1 hjm of all chance of obtaining any concessions from the ty Lin. About the middle of August the Chinese officials even went so far as to send troops against tbe few Hsgliehmen at . hus deprived of Lheir means of living t^oy had to move pen tly to ITogn Kong. On August ?A aoourred the affair 42 of the Black Joke. This small English vessel lying in the Can- ton River had most of her orow murdered without the least provocation for the action by a native hoarding party. To add insult, the leader of the assassins received an honorary promotion. v,y t-M? MM all tbf fcitfj had been driven :e refuge on their ships «t Sfiflg Hong ai re suffered, of inconvenience. (1) The hostility of linese now fectiy oi en . Lin and Admiral IVng authorized the natives to fire on ;\ny ISnglish rvi tempting to land and to cut off .nil food e, er supplies. Welcome relief c mo on August 30 with the arrival of ... , followed shortly . food , MUhr had "been so effectually cut off by the mandarins at loon that .. . Billot ordered an attack upon them early in Sei r. The move had little effect exc elicit from l fiery edict commanding the oxt ermine $t ion har- is and the capture of Capt. Elliot. (2) At last, however, a peaceful settlement seemed most probable and arrangements for on.Lng .rade had been nearly completed when Lin upset of oil into the TXre by demanding the signature of his loathsome bond and by insisting upon the surrender of Lin Weihe's murdered, j.he sudden shange in his attitude can be traced to the inoonstancy of the Thomas Coutts in entering the B*fte* Vigris and in signing the bond contrary t 1 lot's (1) 'iggham, I., 9t , < . (3} Ungham, J., :.03. 43 orders. (1) The renewed attempts to de&troy the ^Snglis^ shippjjjf be- lt agcravat tng arid unbearable . Capt. Smith in command of J . . S. Volage, with orders to protect ahips inst these schemes of the Chine, I hum the;::., revested Hommissioner JAn to rescind his orders for the destruction of the English shipping and to grant permission for the merchants an<- Lr servants tog to return 4*0, pending im ions from one gov eminent . His Msp&toh on] "brought out another demand for " -ihe'e nurdrer, which met with the customary refusal. Bh«a ■ ked, feated and scattered six war junks and thirteen fire ships in the h .ttle of Chuenpee. After the engagement Lin sent a g lowing account of the grand Chinese victory bad heen won !• courage and skill of he great Admiral -wan! (2) nrlng the fall of j. he Koyal Saxon ' ! signed Lin's bond and proceeded up to the anchotage at Vhampoa. This ; soon followed by a proclamation cutting off all trade with the ."inglish forever, since they refused, to execute this bond. The opening Of the new year brought little change. Early in January came news of Lin's reduction bcca\isa of ; he false reports hi had submitted concerning the engagement at Chuenpee. (1) Bingham, I., 107. (ft) %+ \i^ . 44 Tan 30, was called to Peking, but through powerful court influence he succeeded in being returned as governor of Fuki i first six months of this year the annoyances tc ^English ships anchored at Hong Kong continued. r h.e English were troubled by aggravating regulations, n&d ...11 this emperor was advising thed. r dost metier: .. Lin drill *A & small arrv and made what preparations he could to carry out the emperor's wishes. He issued an edici re<,jui* . Ipe 1 assing i >coa '.Tigris tc give bonds not to trai ior 33bglish ships during their stay in Chinese waters. Vo ships were allowed to cy.},crl: more tea or rhubarb than was requisite for nsumption of thei*' own countries. He threatened to stop all trade wi eao if the Portuguese : not cease h^-rboring and aiding the English. His unsi>ccess- fill i&fcempts to ih ships drew forth a plan from a clover prefect in the prnvinc ochili by wh5ch all the ships were to be boarded simultaneously by large bodies of men and their crews put to the sword. This scheme was actually tried the following year. On June 11, 1840, the Chinese tri^ for h....' last tjne to set fire to tegllth Lng«<3) lit outline of events which precipitated bl makes possible an examination of the popular theory as to the is os which England advanced as justifying ».nd requiring the dispatch of an armed expedition to the coasts of Ohina. The (I) BJ , I, i 136. m usual assertion Is th* Great Britain sent out ''nor fleet 1 bombard the Chinese ports and open them to the opium trade. lacy, for it seems to mo to be such, ma;/ very easily have arisen cut af a misconstruction of the BJMi com r - the Op ' ir. Mfl ■■ iters til hout explaining that it is, i- -ertaijji extent, a misnomer, In the fir t. Mliot showed hy the assistance Ire eneclered the Chinese officials In er, 1338,(1) that " rove of the opium trade while it was fe Chinese government and he contended, throu ubleseme and dangerous time*, not for the admission of opium t for a . treatment of the Knglis: nts whf were car on legitimate "businesses at Canton. One of int. 's official notices, quoted from the Chinese aitor. , III., i, clearly states his position on this matter: "Her ' s flap; doesn not ■: protection of a trade •lared illegal by the emperor; and, therefore, whenever a vessel is suspected of having opium on hoard, Oapt. Elliot will that the officers of hin establishment shall accom- y the Chinese officers in their search, and that if afi strict. e?:amination, opium s&all he found, he "ill C no objection to the seizure and confiscation of the cargo. "(2) On 1, it cannot he disputed thai the one thir h Leh conduced more than any other to bring about this war wtti the (1) . (2) Soulger, TTJ., l», 44 opium trade 1th the troubles and difficulties Incident to it. Yet hack of ?,11 this, it must he remembered that the English in China had submitted to over two hundred years of ex.. it- tag treatment j that their embassies to the imperial court had hfif M»l"&9d| in one noteworthy tfurtlUtee fct leaftt, r^e^ptions t of what was dur; I • ; that ship?, h en .rdod and pjiclishr.en slain without any reparation being made; obligations or th« Chinese government to thorn had heen f recently disregarded; and, in short, tha iir residence, trade and even their lives within re matters of t *roat uncertainty to . By the an of 1840 th 1 in addition to these general gro er cortpl tint a aeries of specific insults to redress: their flag been fired upon; the chief superintendent of trade, together some merchants '\ei r families, had been in in the 3 for seven weeks; their property had heen un* lawfully seized and confiscated or destroyed; their memorials d heen treated with barbarian icnorance; the sanctity of iblio ir residencies had been violated by executions before their doors and, finally, their persons had been driven from Canton, On the other hand, the Chinese advance their opposition to the opium trade, based either upon moral considerations or upon the fear of having their land stripped of its silv ~ , nd their dislike for foreigners as a defence for their actions toward the Iftiglish. 47 Under end* a state of ftattf 8*1 ritain declared war, for the purpose net orl: of demanding reparation foi 1 payment for p report: troyed f "but also to secure a free unlrapecfed trade with different ports alon • coast and to elbtain a guarantee ar o©#Sr~ Canton. (l) (1) JoeelyB, 17. C XT A P T 9 II. Irst few monthecf the year 1840 wltnubt>ei ; . repar- ation and equipment of the force which was to or orwte in China and the neighboring Beas under the n n te- pedition" . Lori Auckland, t rnor-Oeneral of In<: , 5 as he ministry to pre;; ftaft force for =x- ition, wis both the Caj d Indian fleets were ©an to reRdeSTOHfl ,-. re to element of the force. As f r completed in Hay th ition comprise four - regiments, the 18th, 26th, 49th and 89thj , £« Madras infantry and artillery cc togethe. hody ^C&l vol- ~s, making in all obou" 3600 bayonet r, "besides the artiilary force; four ships of 7<* ^ms , two of 4tf, five of i£ht c oi*vettes and four steamers beside, orts for the troops, (1) Rear-admi ral tlie Hon, George Elliot was appointed senior plenipotentiary and also made commandor-in~chief of t] o<ion. lure arrive neap ore on time to ge north with the squadron, the chief ceesaand dev< .rily v 'omnodcre Sir Gordon 3 . The plan of campaign provided ft voue (1) Jocoly ; Bernard, 100 < 49 of the whole forct at Singapore before WKf 30. Prom there they were to proceed directly to the Island of Chilean at tflM th •-tse-kian,^, stopping on ,cao to 1 .rd Capt. es HI let i who had "been Rgpoii! ! or plenipotentiary. After establipMr. Mai, the conrmnder-in-chj of us tc 'el- ate 1 .:r and thence cnmmun ions with the in: 1 court in^.d) e fleet . ere on J . ?\odorc 'Mr Qera o n Areaer in enariwd. . ■ . rlos Elliot wm ■>,oao, as ed, and the fleet coi i usan . ArrJ . harbor of Cbusan OB July found the Chinese prepared to defend the poi e ai, whic of a rid^o f ne i of t r o fehore line. Lorti .Tocelyn, vfae served as i secretary to the H— miHi linnTittr c.nd who h'-,s Ik; .- able account of this fir. t cwnpaign, accompanie b, Fletcher, in . . S. Wollesley, i>rete r ' on "board junk to discuss terns of surre Although the Chinese recognised at once of the Jtaglirh force, they asked that the attack he do until t following morning at day bre s fimvlly agreed that hob- ilities espe< * re into the troubles atteru Lin 1 8 acts at Canton, ehoiO vc tine for an invest:* rgfti alleged b; If fourd true, reparation wvs l -rorcitse . _e tg n the rt of September i *4 for a per f coi':;. r iipenG? ■s. nton and Macao the season had r .ssed rati' or ly, r on his arrj- ith tho fleet from S: re ued a no ice that frcn June 28 the port of Canton would be considered in a sta blockad . I ^ ton officials retaliated "by offering rewards fcr the ^rc destr -aiglj lag an 8C run ship of the lir , he En V, rfcttrfclario price and even the natives guilty of 8upplyir . English WJ .'ovisicne or of helpii. :vs servants did not escape. (o) inese resorted to Mis (1) Jocolyn, ?S, ) Jocelyn, 99-120. (3) } ir I., 1?2 •Mackenzie, 201. . ••thod of i e war, seeki; rsonal a&ring and sacrifice What their mil .1 could not attain, F >v!;^nco, w! . . fell in',o the hands of Chine. , 'ho only i nco tc !" } he Portuguese governor of that .nd, v . annoyance* Boon : ion ■ .ish rious. o . Smith ir ;,he iron changed natters, however, by sue- Mlly line so y bX on shore, arm, v: *e, •. seventeen © r guns, burned their jid inner harbor. (1) A dorr .-.tier. . . . .nd Chusan, clo he ions . . -, (tentiaries o 'Tacao, v MRmlefKMt-on was opened with the spec 5 ssioner Ke ashen, late' mton. Tn December a ijice nat. or able ory at m and ton officials, due in all prc- he growing influence of the antj court and to the activity o: fill .(3) Meantime, i line SO had for ceo. Admiral Charles JSjLliot to (1) Ottehterlony, W), (2) Ouchterlony, Si, (3) Jocelyn. 138 ; Ouchterlony , 8 f U93. 53 resign the chief afHMnd Gordon his res aoo.me subject, Joe el:' n i ' rt mom< have doubted Pictio , circulated thro dislike of nativesin China to tYr 1; rtar rulers; for it I, as t rtuni latest "'.on." On 13 11 owing J "and their e and anxious face a r-roveu to us I -'alee was the ld< w* were amongst a people who only wi detep-i id tyrant •." (1) Ouohterlony, 90. {%) Kaoken (3) Jocely-., 51. CHAPTER III. JJfB JAMPAKrfl ABrdm •Tjont of 'he fleet and the stormin of the marines and no Idlers on the twenty- sixth of ttfet* 'Vithan loss of a single man ,ntry drove the Chinese who still sto rds "by il fptof f the Frenches around the oity wall and occupied the city elf without any resistance worthy of the rtarto.(l) . K» S. T>ruid, Pyl ? ides and Alger tee t o blockade irt and a garrison of abeu': seven hundred non f Mi and '.ments for the island of Koolarigsco vf commands Araoy, the expedition continued northward of September fifth and stood for ClniBan. Hen found tho chine bo had' ,de excellent use 61 the interval since the departure of the lish in February hy throwing up a strong lino of fortifica- ns about the harbor and city of Tingh&i. These in turn were all itemed and Uflttn jlieh on October 1, the land (1) , XI., 232-250$ Ouehtorlony, X74rl77j ' -"rr^yt 12-22, 61 ces doing the brunt of the work under support from the ships * guns.d) Iamediately upon the recapture of tin island, "enry Pottinger announced t3 ^rrangsmenta woiild be made bliahi] gpci. . .- •' ■ " no aire n.£hai and its d«r reels he restored to t , until the ufcole if the dei of not only complied with, but carrier o full bff >t»"(2) Binj , writi fore H . ■ .- I : " ' quotation b he permanent retention of conaidera one of hi moat advantageous point* 'he whole northern coast. > tab or 9, A l rir William Parser ore attack upon the cit? ttt Ghlnghai at the mouth of the ? T ing] Q . The followir ht vesaels took up their positions "ore the fortifications and pursued the usual tactics of breaches f< to advance upon a frustrat enemy. The soldiers escaladed the walls and one l e planted •ifrlish flap; up en t" of a captured Chinese cit: . Imated losses* of the imperial forma In actions of tills one day unountod to fifteen hundred against sixteen killed d a very few wounded on ide of .(3) ree days later the advance of part of he force u] OH o revealed the unexpected sight of a great city of ^.n^^o^X) itanta deserted by its defenders. The English took posses- aion on October 51, but they could find no manaarins or of fit? TTT~ 1 . ~ "., TTTT^O; Ouchterlony, 17a j la-r^r, ."*-:w,. (2)Bin£ham, II., 266. (5) ttin^aa, II., 266-281} Murray, 42-50. wh om to ar r ang • a r ai n i ic r i . ( 1 ) DvHU ftw r- cceeding months?, the English had ative rest and were further strengthen efl "by the arrival of .its from JYigland ai ' . inor 'r.st iflri cr J t nt:.l the middle- of March, 1842.(2) Vhe of this nor." ) >n looted by the Chinese as tl ; cities of King d Chi. *' nforl' day*** So it turned out to be, thai osite sense fi^cn irhich the; Intended it. Their forces having enetered ?Tingpo at night v;ith the intention of surprising i3 fcgllsh, net witl ible defc/t. Th&ir fire rafts and gainst the fleet succeeded no belter. At Chinghai "celestial*" escaped with lees loss hut with no Mere credit th s at : This demonstration on the tsnV cf the Chinese "exterminating" lav. As soon as the Engli. wanders- in-chief learned t" large force w s massing he river at Ta#kt , they took about 1 ;CK i vj to 1 J :,ck and disperse .(4) Sir Hugh Ocugh's ( ch then hat the Chinese place* .t hopes in the body of flaked Ire •«- bled .about O.'sekee and thai the aetlea on the Heights of mi, just back of , gave proof of the c< (1) Bingham, II., 282-28 , urra, , 58. (2 , ZX« f 28? . ■, , 67*2 • . (3) Bingham, II., 2SK>j Ouohterlony, urray, I -11*. (4) Bingham, II., 306. *8 officers and nen. As usual , the Chinese suffered d.ef ©• t and utter rout.(l) Xt was just after the return from' Tsekee that lllaJi discovered another o^ those proclamations, Issued "by a h e of-ric5.nl, whieii prw irml rewards for tlte capture and slaving of >inglish officers and men. $50,000 attached to 1" re of either of the "rebel chiefs" and urn to the production of tr heads. (2) urly li Lngpo was in It* turn evacuated ard tl fleet proceeded northward for an attack apon Chaptio, a srtftlJ I rty miles below Hang-chau and the por ; ntry for nese .The f .11 of Chap*>o w s marked by nn un- usu 11 stubborn resistance on t! wt of the Tart a- risen f great self-slaughter and carnage the , who so far misunderstood their conquerors as to trover 1 -der their own families rather than to allow thorn t-i r^ar? n f ] nds«(3) feci, here for the first time, signs of waver? ^an to show in the Chinese official circles. THepoo, who had "been restored to the governorship of Che- rcvince arc figured throughout alt th< lattdr part of the negotiations with the JJnglieh, S' to arrange terms of -.(4) Ihe Tlnftlish plenipotentiary, however, re- fnsec' to treat with anyone save persons delegated fro emperor with plenary powers to conclude rx treaty. (5) (1) Bihghan, II., 29< — 1 j ierlon", 2i : .:->-2'V . y, 1 ' . "1. {:} ham, TT ., 318 j Ouchterlcn; , £81 ; Murray, 136-14 . (4) 'a communication to Sir Hugh Gough; iSttrrav, 271* (5) Bingham. II., 327. Eng. plenipotentiaries te Rlepeo ^turray, 27*. 54 Leaving Chapco on , the fleet mmg round the head- ed SKn£~&nfli Ba;- and el In to e\t1 ' ' os of *©oeung(l) %&$Utl(£) en r . After in- i.ctin. tl] *ae oj re- inf mflWmc? and Xnd5a tl : "or the bions up the Ynag-tee-ktan , the fleet again "broke out lit sail . Aire 9 was well into 1 hi river. (3) •er of infantr; , elve liable fcr Aye Bcrvic* in dgn amounted less than 9000 , i , "<"th, r< ' ts; t' , ■ ' ftftd 4 1st regitoenta of \ative i , and lerv. lonel . miral Sir VilJ r commanded - '- i s, 2 an ■ '■•■; Sir ottinger's Circular of oune 84,- rurray, W£6 . . II. , 328-340; . a; , 295-3 . (4) Ouchterlony, 329. C5 every effort to render the Peiho Piivar and the capil ." pregnable. They feared t] nee of the enemy J.r '" f cf Peehili f hut tfetv seemed to ferret the great injurjr the 3C!ild Infl:l • blocking ■ June* ture with the Yfcfcg^tse-kiane a* fciri£ nff af "he supplies of the iinp.erl.al city. This the English set ahent doing. On the 21 jst of c T ui;y they landed in three hri Lajcr- G-nereal Lei htoun, Major- >ral Schcedde an - ar - .1 ; tley, and opened the Yang-tse-kiang campaign by stormljog f -hin-kianc. The ' r resistanc* ) vith the extreme heat tc an arduous or . column fought spirited engag enente without i walls before the Chines cd.(l) Ouchterlony traces these movements with great c;re and point out the decisive re- Its of his victory. (2) By it the empire was severed. The carried beyond the strictly maritime districts where the emperor ■■ hie subjc< I would be easily confined; great distress had been caused nmon£ the natives of the inner provinces 1 I is stoppage of t] - .11 eise, the defeat pf a favorite general vith a (1) BinghaSL, II., 344-31 ; array, 172-17y ; r ~enry Pe.ttlftgar's Circular w ?o -er ?r ' ie ty» s p China. July 24 t » I*nrr< , 841; Sir Hugji (tout's dispatch of July 35 a - ffcirray, 279; Report of Ma^ .-Gen. Schoedde, in eomm and of second brigade, to Sir >ug!fa on Jul,- SO,,* } • . ( ;,- Murray, 300,509. (4) Bingham, XI.. SrtOj Ouchterlony, <■:" j; ' tugl " u * f s dis- patch to Tord Stanley on August. 21, 1842,- Mtt?Tiqr.~91ti| Sir y Pot dinger's dispatch to Sir Wtlljam Parker and Sir Hugh Gcttgh, August 17, 1842,- y, 313. (5) Ouchterlony, 450 j Cixv.} ie, ; "Ir Ttnnrz Pottinger' e dispatch to Sir William Parker and Sir Fugh Crough, August 2? t 1842, - ffurraj , S3 \ CHAPTER V. THE TREATY OF H4RKIJR3 «3D II CTTfTOK, Considerable conflict exists fanong the authorit5.es con- sulted over the date and manner of the signature of the treaty that ended the First Chinese War. For instance, ;ingham(l) makes the statement that "the plenipotentiary on the 17th com- municated to the comrianders-in-ohief that the following treaty of peace had "been signed by the imperial commissioners", and passes over the business of the 29th with this meagre reference: "Active hostilities therefore oeas d, and the &nperor f s assent to the provisions having been intimated by an imperial edict on the 29th, vessels were dispatched to the different Chinese ports to remove the embargoes on their trade. "(2) From such a statement of the facts it must be inferred that the formal signature of the treaty took place on the 17th, whereas the ^ articles drawn up and signed that day const! tu ted only a pro- visional treaty that mbckx had to be submitted to the emperor and receive his approval before the Chinese commissioners cmld sign in full authority to bind their government. ?#iat Sir "enry Pottinger really did communicate was the request for (1) I-irebam, II., :>CO. (2) Bingham, II., 36... r>8 a suspension if hostiliti es, (1) T, is dispatch ran: "Gentlemen- I', affords me great, satisfaction to have it in my power to inform you that my ne tions with the Chinese high officers who have boon appointed by \r t(fl for no- to that slate that authorize b Mi u ba^ thai you will consider hostilities suspen&fcd (Dated) Steam Frigate, en, off Nankin, 17th_AugUBt, 184f;.»(;>) Confusion "becomes worse confounded when the proceedings on August 20 -\re examined. S, Wells Willi 'ins writes: "It wa» ill lake at night on the 17th that the final draft was sent to the 'hinese", and he says that the visit of the Chinese loners to the Cornwall is on August ^#(3) was one of ceremony only. ~ 7 urray(4) and Ouohtorlony{5) speak of an earlier arrangement of a provisional treaty and give considerable space to their derailed accounts of this visit of the 20th without oven mentioning the transaction of any official business. Yet, on the other hand, Sir Henry Pottinger in his circular "To her 2*ri tannic Majesty's Subjects in China", which was "P>ated on board the steam frigat* Q^ieen, . . .off Hanking, this gQ&h^Jl ay of August, 1843*, says: " TT er Britannic Majesty's Plenipotentiary, etc., in vThina has extreme gratification in announci. her (1) Ante, "\ (2) Sir Kenry Pottinger f s dispatch to Sir William Parker and Ugl '•• ■" it 1" , 1^42,- ?.!urraj . $!&*> (3) Obviously written by mistake for the 20th.- Williams, 56f>. '-•-ray, 197. (n) Ouchterlon^ , *42. 69 Majesty's subjects in China, that lie has this day concluded and signed with the Chinese High Commissioners, deputed to negotiate with him, a treaty, of which the following are the most Important provisions w (l) Nov-, of two things, one: tither the authorities who treat this period and seem to agree that this provisional treaty was signed before the 86 th are all wrong, and tMs dispatch of Sir Rinry Pott ingot's must he controverted taken as settling beyond a doubt thla A ) corresponds ic closely 5r detail wltfc the aecotwts ef (1) Sir Hetty Fetttnger'a circular,- ^rray, 'PW&, aadwell, 118. '?>) Khellye, !^7 70 Ouchterlony! 1) and Murr«y(2) of the meeting on the 29th as to preclude the possibility of reference to different instance** Murray's mistake in chronicling the events attendant upon the signature of the treaty under of August :*H>th(3) must he attributed to carelessness, for he publishes in the appendix to his work the vary dispatch cf iter Majesty's plenipotentiary which set bias beyong all question of doubt that this meeting with the Chine.se high coiamie si oners, together with the signing of the treaty, took place on August. 29th. (4) The commissioner a appointed by the eaperer +c nej + * tr * s trp'it" wf*re i l*Kaa**ving, a cousin of the or himself ^ General of the ^ an ton forces; 8 T;ieutei - -oyernor of ^'hapooi and 3.^nu, Qentral-ir^Chief of Fiang-su and Kiang-si.(5) The treaty itself as finally concluded furbishes an epifc- Acme of the re Ml In th 1 s W'«.r, A synopsis 1 ifcs warranted because %ha pf 'Wfal provisions show tea definite settlement of long mi inns, and because horities consult (6j Is r -Iriost generally copied the ■iff ; t %t tha articles £iven by Sir Tr enry PettiHgar in i i . i , . >— - , . . n . .,..,.., . , .., „ ,,.... ,, , .i i. n. — i —. (1) Ouchterlony, 450. (2) Hurray, 209. (3) Murray 209. [4* Sir Haiiry Pottinger's di spat oh to Sir William barker and Sir Hugh Gough, dated August 29, 1842, ~ Murray , 316; Sir Hugh go Lai jalay, Augu , - : '\i fi<\j , G12 Annual Register, 18*4, £83.. " ~ (5) Bingham, II., 560j Murray, 19< . (p>) Bingham, II., 360; Ouchterlony, *5i; Williams, II., 568; Davis, I., 158. 71 his "Circular to her Britannic Majesty 1 * Subjects in China*, under d to of August 20, 1842.(1) The articles are: 1. Lasting peace and friendship betweenthe two empires, 2. Xfci ports of canton, Amoy, Fu-ch*u, Finfrpo &n& Shanghai tc bo thro- on to British subjects for residence and trade; superintendents or consular officers to be appointed tc reside at these ports; regular and just dues to^the Chinese government to be established and published* 3. The island At Hong Kong to be ceded in perpetuity to eat Britain. i 4."The mperor!of China agrees to pay the sum of six millions of dollars as the value of the opium ^tiich was delivered iip * at Canton in the month of Karch, 1859, as a ransom for the lives of her Kajesty*s superl^lUBdent and the subjects, w!?o had been im- ,nd threatened with death by the Chinese Wtgh Officers. "(2) 5. " T ong merchants and Co-hong at Canton abolished and permission to trade in above xtwa named five ports with homsoever they will granted to English mer- chants. Furthermore, p -^Tnent of 83,000,000 agreed upon as compensation for debts of insolvent ^ r ong merchants due British traders. (1) jtttiy, 238. (a) Annual Register, 1844, 48^. 72 6. j&aperor to pay *~ 12,000,000 war indemnity to defray the expenses of the English expedition; with the reser- vation thnt from this sum there shall he deducted all monies collected, by the British, as ransoms for Tillages and. cities, subsequent to tei£ , 3 £1. ft ?«**& sun of £21,000,000 to he paid as follows: six immediately; six in I ■ ■; five in 1<>-4| and ur in Pi^e percent interest to run on all amounts not paid b^ stipulated. I . ish subjects confined in any part of China to he unconditionally released. *->. An act of full and entire amnesty to be published by the emperor to all Chinese subjects under the ban on having held service under or intercourse wlihg -he British government or its officers. lO.Vhe emperor agrees to establish and publish at the five oj>on ports a fixed and equitable tariff for exports and imports. British merchandise having once paid conveyed custom dues at any of the five regular ports may be^ by Chinese merchants to any province or city in the interior, on paying a further amount as transit dues, Lcl shall not exceed (the amount to he fixed) per- 73 cent of the tariff value of such goods. 11. Correspondence between the officers of the two govern- ments to "be ccnd\*cted on grounds of perfect equality. W.British forces to retire from "ankinf: and the frand i".l and the blockade of Chinese titade to he re- moved, as soon as the emperor* s assent to the treaty be received and the first instalment of the indem- nity paid. military post at Tinghai also to be abandoned; Kcolangsoo and Chusan to continue in possession of the Kn^lish until full payment be made id definite arrangements for opening the five ports to English merchants be consummated. lo. notifications to be exchanged as soon as possible. (1) I»one at Nankinf;, August 29, 184J . After t3 ''or had signified his approval of the treaty, enry Pottin^er ordered the embargo of the Vang-tse-lciarc and the grand 1 to bo remoroo . (:l) 0| 12, th« fl#6t dropped dovTi th« river. At Chusan they found suf f j - oient reinforcements and supplier to enable (he expedition to ■ry out another year's Ofunpalgn. TTon^ Kong was sifted about the middle of October and finally left behind by V\c r* burning •et of anted -p-esaels and transports late iv T^ecom^er. force of abou- A Lned in China, nd (1) Annual Register, 1844, 483. (2) Sir Henri' Pott inker's dispatch of AugUftt 29,- Hurray, 316. 74 of Lord Saltoun, to hold Ohusan and Koolangsoo according to tho provisions of the treaty, and to constitute a permanent garrison for ' T oni: K"on£. Major -General Sehoedde commanded about 2000 of tho man stationed at Ohtisanj Lieutenant-colonel Cowper ltad about 1000 to hold Eoolattcsoo; while the remainder con- stituted the garrison at Hon/; Kor! ( , er* Lord Saltoun had his liGadjuarters. (1) With this disposition c the troops left in China, Sir Henry Pottinger was in a position to demand a fulfilment, of the treaty. The Chinese High Commissioner Keying exchanged tho ratifications with Sir Henry on Juen 26, 1843,(2) and at that time signed with him a declaration which fixed the transit duties according to Article 10 of the Treaty if :Tankinf;. (3) This date also marked the beginning of Sir Henry Pott inker's term as governor f -- n»- rone:. (4) ?y the 22nd of July Sir was able to publish the commercial treaty and the scale of tariffs which tod been i d upon, and. in his proclamation accompanying these documents he warned the British subjects that they were forbidden to trade in any of the four new treaty ■rts until formally opened and that they must in no case at- tempt to trade in any but the treat:-' ports along the coast. (6) (1) Willi* Boulger, 221. IZ) ' r, H30. (o) Annuaa Register, 1844, $86. [4] & Regis ter, 18/- , 571. (b\ Anniial fieglst e r , 184 3 , 368, has "June" for July. Annul a Kegieterj lt>43, 75 Keying, in his proclamation, in turn urged the Chinese to ob- serve with, greatest Cv7tre the provisions of the treaty and announced "that a commencement M should "he made with t- opening of the pert of Canton under the new regulations, on the first of the sQYerith month (July 27, 1 I '.(1) On August 3, "■nry Pcttinger published another proclamation in the Hone ng Gazette discountenancing the attests tc take opium into treaty ports and warning the English merchants that they diu. so at their peril, (2) Then on October tj 1-43, followed the lementary Treaty between Her Fajeety and the Emperor of China which regulated the conducted of the Inglish in thejtreaty ports and in general cohered all matters in dispute which con- nected themselves with the new arrangement about to be initi- ated. (S) Under this new regime Mr. G. Y. Lay began his duties as consul at Cnnton on July 27, IMS] Capt. George Palfour went up as 8onsul tc Shanghai and ?*r. Fenry Bribhle to Amoy in '■ember of that year; while 'ft*. Robert Thorn took up the work shortly afterward at Ningpo.(4) With these offieeri est ' at the fiTC open ports and the trade again runr Ln peaceful channels, there r> - ined little more to he done to carry out in full the Treaty (1) Annual Register, 1843, 369. (<.) Beulger. lis., o71« (3) Annus istfr, 1844, 487. (4) ^oulger, III., H50, 250n. 76 of Nanking. The Chinese govern* ient, on its side, mad© its pay- ments promptly at the stipulated limes and demanded in return the evacuation of Foolangsoo tat Chus&n by the British forces. The garrison left Eoolangsoo and QEtttftfia *&i evacuated in «Tul; , '5, just a little toe soon tc "be of use tc the SngljU & crd to play against the hostile attitude recently e,»trumed by the populace and officials at Canton. (1) Sir Henry Pottinger, who had passed over the governorship of Hon.- Fong t« BUr Fohn Pranoie X>avis in July, 1844,(2) left the British interests in China hn what appeared to be a road of permanent | eace and prosperity. £££ had discountenanced the opium trade and had hogged his countrymen to observe with strictest faith the new commercial regulations. Then, after his term of most valuable and honorable service to the British government throughout all these important diplomatic re&ktions with the Stipiro of the East, he departed for England in fej hopes that his work would yield, a permanent peace. This hope he shared wilfc the rest of Her Majesty's subjects in China; but like them he failed to reckon with that constant source of trouble and discord, which had been the cause of many grievous complaints in earlier ye rs. In the rabble ?n& officials at Canton were to be found the elements of strife which were soon to upset the newly established peace ^nd launch the two nations into another costly war. (1) Davis, I., *#*< (2) Boulger, III., 853* L X a R A P H Y. — o-- Annual Register , The, or a ^ievr of the History and Politics of the Year 1B4 ■', London, lo44. Same for 16441 London, rratire of -e round orld, performod in Her ■*s Ship Sbfljfetty du fcfce Years ia^-18^2, in- -dinc T>etails of the > Thyh1 Operation* 5n Chin , from Beeeaber 1840, to "ovem'ber 1841; 2 vols.; London, 1843. Bernard, W. Bit rative of th< ^gos and Services of the Nemesis from 1840 l,o 16421, and of the Combined Military and ]7aval Operations in China: Comprising a Complete Account of the Colony of Hong Kon£, and Remarks on the Character and Habits of kfee Chinese. Prom Notes of Commander W. F. Hall, R. V«| London, 104 . Ighatt, Commander J. Ell let, R, Jf • J -rratire of xpodition Lna, fro?- "*nenee- fit of the War to its '• ermination in 1842; with Sketches of the banners and OtistOM of that fiingttli , ft hitherto 78 almost Unknown Country} 2 vols.; London, 1843. Boulder, T>emetrius Charles: TT i story of China} S vols.; London, 1881, 18G4. ■j "Shad welly Colchester, Lord: History of the Indian Administration of Lord Ellcnborough, in hie Correspondence with the Duke of Wellington. To which 3s prefixed, by Permission of Her Majesty, Lord lenbe ' s Letters to the Queen during that Period; London, 1874. Cunyn&harie, Cap lain Arthur; An Aide-do-Camp's Recollection of "e rvi.ee in China, a Residence in its to Other Islands in the Chinese BtoMtJ 2 vols. ; tendon, 18.44. fir John Francis, Bart., . . Ui China: A General Description of that Empire and its Inhab- itants; with the History of Foreign Intercourse down to the ?>ents which produced the Dissolution of 1857: Z role.; London, 1867. SI 1 enb o r ough , 3 ,c r d : oe "Colchester". 79 8U>i*! "enry: Journal of ho Proceedings of the Late Embassy to Chijta; Comprising a Correct Narrative of the Public Transactions of t y \e HKtoamsy, of tlia fojrage to and frttta China, and of ./noy f ttffc of IL.o Pel-fe ulurn to Canton; London, 1817 . ht% General Si 1 " Hope t Bee "XnollyB*. jTeeelTlT, 5>erdi "ix Months with the Chinese Sxpedltitm; ^ ( Leaver? from Soldier f s Net c-l^ov ; Lend on , I&41 . 9lly«, Colonel Henr : fe $f General Sir Hope Grant with Selections from His Correspondence: 2 vols.; H&intourgh and London, 169- . okenzie, Keith Stewart: Narrative of t.ho Beeeftd CuqealgB in China; London, 1842. /'urray, Lieutenant Alexander 1 lings ii« China. P.einfl thi Personal Tfarrntive of Officer engaged in the Late Chinese Expedition, from the ^capture of Ghusan in 18*1, to the Peace of banking in 1842; London, 1843. Oprehterlony, Lieutenant John, P. G. S« i nese Tar: ■' ••cunt of 411 the Operatieite if the .-•itish. Porces from the Commsncenen* to the Treaty of r&ingj Le a den * 1844, 80 Shadwell, Li out enant -General , 0. B*l The Life of Colin Cam], hell, Lord Clyde, Illustrated "by libctracts from His Diary and Correspondence; 2 vols . | Minjsurgh and London, Iftfil. Smith, Kev. 0«Tg» , **. A.: A Narrative of an .Tftcploratory Visit to .Haoh of tho Consular Cities of ChllMt, and to the Islands of Fon~ Kong and isan, in "behalf of the QSmTftD "Missionary Society, in the ^ears 1844, 1«40, |846| London, 1047. Staunton, Sir George, Bart.: An Authentic Account of an Embassy from the King of Great itain to the -mperor of China (Macartney* • ISmbassy) ; 3 vols.; London, 1797. Willims, CH >. ^ell* : Dm Middle ttj A Summary of the Geography, Government, Education, Social Life, Arts, Religion, etc., of - Chinese ?mpir Tp.hahit.ants ; 2 vols.; Hew York and rtden, 1846, THE RELATIONS OF EUROPEANS WITH CHINA 1516 - 1800 & 1847 - 1860. THESIS Presented for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts by Jesse H. Wilson, Jr. Cornell University. 1900. 1 - eiiA IA^le OF contends. PART I . The Earliest Trading Relations through The Macarteney Embassy. I.— The Portuguese II. — The Spaniards III.— The Dutch IV. The English PART II. Prom 1847 through the Exchange of ratifications at Peking, November 5th, 1860. Chapter I.- Prom 1847 to the arrival of Lord Elgin, July 6, 1857. » ■ , Chapter II.- From the beginning of Elgin* s Ml 8 si on to the Treaty of Tien-tsin. Chapter III.- From the Treaty of Tien-tsin to the exchange of ratifications at Peking, November 5, 1860. PART I. The Earliest Trading delations thromgh the Macarteney Embassy. The Portuguese. In an essay which is to deal mainly with the growth of commercial relations between China and the western world, it seems unnecessary to go further tack than the voyage of Rafael Perestello in 1516. The somewhat hazy stories of communication with the Rome of Marcus Antoninus, and the marvelous telle s of Marco Polo, even , though they may be now conceded to be something more than mere efforts of the imagination; such stories of the dim past, however interesting in themselves, &o not seem to have a sufficient bearing on the growth of Chinese trade, to warrant them more than a mere notice, in this place. Then let the year 1516 be our starting point. That surely is a long enough sweep, from 1900, to include even the most remote sources of the influences which are at work in the commercial China of to day. iiXJ"lO^ .... . In that year the great Portuguese conquorer Albuquerque sent Rafael Perestello by junk from Malacca to China for the double purpose of exploration and trade. Concerning this voyage nothing is known except that it was very profitable. It is after ascertainment of this comparatively simple fact, that confusion begins. Secondary authorities, Williams, Davis and Danvers, contain a hopeless conglomeration of contradictions of themselves and each other. They all agree, however, that the next expedition went out in 1518 commanded by the Peres de Andrade, (barring Davis who sends him out in 1520) and that it was accompanied by an ambassador from the king of Portugal, Thome Teres. Concerning Thames advent- ures, the accounts are infinitely and irreconcilably varied, The general impression seems to be that he reached Peking, and that the main cause of his diplomat- ic failure was the conduct of Simon de Andrade, who es- tablished himself on the island of S changes 1 wan in the estuary of the Canton River in - several different years, <_ according to your author. Williams alone, of tho writers named, mentions the influence of an envoy from Malacca, as contributive to the Portuguese Ambassador's non-success. The length of time given for Thome's stay in China varies from three to twenty- seven years; - with the date given for Simon de Andarade's arrival. The Viconde de San tar em > who may be almost con- sidered an original authority, because of his research among the original manuacripts preserved in Lisbon, in his n Memoria Sobre 6 Estabelecimento de M&cau", clears up some points and adds worse confusion to others. In the first place, he makes no mention of Ra fael Peres- teilo who is said to have come out in 1516, nor of Simon de Andrade whose rascality is presumed to have turned the tide against the Ambassador Thome 1 . Nor does the name Thome Peres anywhere appear. His account reads : that Fernam Peres de Andrade arrived with a fleet in 1517, and reached Peking in 1521, being the first Portugaese since Marco Polo's time to . ill come to China; that an envoy from Malacca arrived and accused Peres of being a spy, whose real object was to find out the weak points for attacking the Empire, and that Peres, commission was not in a form pleasing to the imperial court; and that, Peres was consequently ordered to be taken back to Macao, and executed, and that the Portuguese were to' be driven out of that place, why these orders were not carried out, he does not explain but goes on to say that Peres did not perish but con- verted a Chinese woman, married her and remained there about twenty-seven years. This story, however, is some- what weakened by the fact that Santarem seems to support it by a tale of the notorious liar Mindes Pinto, who relates that, in Sempitay, about 1548, or 1549, he met a Chinaman who could recite in Portuguese the first few words of the Dominical Orison, and who explains the fact by saying that, the Chinaman's wife was Peres* half-breed daughter, calling herself Ignez de Leira. ■ ' < ' For the next step in the story, the beginning of Macao, Santarem appeals to a Frenchman, Sonnerat, com- missioner of the French Marine, and Member of the Acadamie of Sciences of Paris. In the extract quoted, he tells a tale of how the Portuguese helped the Chinese defeat the Ladrones ( pirates infesting the Canton River) he says: w Pour prix de leurs victories ils obtinerent un p&tlt ile seche et avide a 1' entree de la riviere de Canton, ou ils batirent Macao? This is the story followed by Dan vers, and emphatically denied by Williams for the rather insufficient reason that in his day, 1857, the Portuguese paid a nominal ground-rent of 500 taels. Sate rem then dismisses the. early complications concerning the Portuguese establishment with the remark "Tal e a incertesa e obscuridade de nossas primemras relacoes com a China". After all the details are not highly important. The point is that the Portuguese did establish themselves ■J ..-/ at Macao before any other Europeans had opened relations with China, and along abput 1537, had some sort of a settlement there. Davis admits only a temporary shelter, while Williams states distinctly that there were " three Portuguese settlements near Canton, one at St Johns, (l) ( S ehan ch T wan ), one at a smaller island, called Lamflacao ( Lang-peh-kau ) , lying north-west of the Grand Ladrones, and the third just begun at Macao." He adds that by 1560 all the Portuguese had concentrated at Macao. The settlement at Macao seems to have grown from the few sheds built there qs shelter for merchandise, On all other points, until the barier wall, the authorities are delightfully diverse. Davis states, that the factory at Ningpo was established by the ships of the fleet of Pernam de Andrade in 1518. Williams dated the settlement after Simon de Andrade had been (I) The italics are mine. driven out of Schanch'wan (which occurred according to his version, in 1521). Both agree, however, that the Portuguese were driven out by a popular rising caused by their own outrageous conduct. One of their most unpopular habits seems to have ceen jfchafc of scouring the neighboring country for handsome women and virgins. Williams, quoting from an unnamed authority, s&ys that the people in their vengeance "distroyed twelve thousand Christians, including eight hundred Portuguese, and burned thirty-five ships and two junks". How there could have been so many Christians of which such a small proportion were Portuguese, unless the said Portu- guese had accumulated unusually large harems and - - ££&Selyted the members thereof, and whether, under the circumstances, any of them could be called Christians, are off-shoots of the question upon which dilation is perhaps unnecessary. Davis makes mention of a fact not elsewhere noted when he states that about 1522, one Alfonso de M&Lo, arrived off the coast of China, ignorant of the enmity which Simon de Andrade had aroused. According to Davis he had, "six ships under his command, ' These • a Portuguese writer observes, and 'was sent on shore for water and returned with blood 1 ." The meaning is clear, if the antecedents are a bit mixed; and it followed that Melo sailed away from such an inhospitable coast. Davis al30 discants at some length concerning of the marvelous adventures . that marvelous liar Mendes A Pinto. It is to be hoped that he bases his story on some better authority than that gentleman's own. The date given for these adventures is "about 1552". He also mentions that it was about this time "that the famous apostle of the East, St. Francis.. Xavler;, "concerning whom so many credible and edifying miracles have been related," died at San-Shan, or St. Johns", (or Schanch-wan )• He makes no statement. , as does Williams, that the secondPortuguese Embassy, which was undertaken by the vice-roy of Goa, and , with beautiful insubordination prevented by the governor of Malacca from proceeding to China, was attempted at his suggestion. It may not te uninteresting to note that the remains of St. Xavier»s tomb may be still seen at Scaanch f wan. As to the further development of Macao since 1560, Danvers has a tale of how the Portuguese aided the Emperor in driving out a noted pirate (I) and in return received the gift of the island by imperial edict. This story, which Williams does not mention at all, Davis emphatically denies. He says that Maco never was held in full sovereignty by the Pontuguese that they still (1857) pay the nominal ground rent af 500 taels, that the Chinese mandarins periodically inspect the Portuguese forts, and levy import duties. It also appears that a Chinese officer called a Tsotang, governs the Chinese residents and the town, the Portuguese being granted the privilege only of govern- ing themselves and being even prohibited from building any houses without official permission. (I) v. ante Santaren, who dates this occurance much earlier. . 10 The story Macao during the last half of the eighteenth and the first decade, of the nineteenth centuries, is one of decline. The Chinese became more and more arrogant and stringent in their rediculous trade limitations until, when in 1820, the opium trade was removed, the colony hardly survived the blow. In 1880, the antire income from customs was only seventy thousand taels and there was a population of only five thousand Portuguese to contrast with the Chinese number of thirty thousand. The history of this period comes more naturally under the treatment of the beginning of English trade with China, inasmuch as the Company&s fcupercargbe6 made their residence at Mac ■ « 13 His Holiness the Pope, who was eager to reward his faithful servants. II The Spaniards. Since we are dealing with commercial relations, the early relations of the Spaniards, and the Dutch may fair- ly be given baa*- small notice here. Especially the Spaniards. The Spaniards had un- paralled opportunities in the early days to gain control of the trade of China, and naturally, neglected them. As early as 1543 the Spanish admiral, Legaspi, con- quored Manilla. Once when a Chinese naval officer came out looking for a pirate, and received aid from the Spaniards, they were allowed t.o send back some friars with him. Phillip II_ ordered an ambassy to be sent to Peking. It got itself shipwrecked and generally flared ill. No attempts at trade were made* although Maco was open to the Spainards, as well as to the Portuguese 14 On the contrary, they made it a point to particularly burden any trade which came from China to Manilla. They established a system of imposts as unreasoning and suicidal, as those of China itself. It is said that a powerful Chinaman having this condition of affairs brought to his notice, took care that exactly the restrictions practiced at Manilla should be levied up 013 all Europeans seeking to trade at Canton, and this was the beginning of the famous . oo-Hong. Davis (Vol. I p. 26) is somewhat eloquent on this subject: "It has been suggested that , had bonded ware- houses, with a system of draw- backs on re-exportation been established at Manilla, one half of the trade of China might have been established there at present. The heavy charges and vexatious conduct of the Chinese government, together with the close monopoly of the Hong merchants, would have driven many a ship from Canton, could a neighboring port have been found with a supply of goods in case,of need. Formerly, American and English ships often found it convenient to stop at Manilla n 15 for a cargo of rice, by the importation of which to Canton, they avoided the heavy port charges; but so ignorant is the Spanish government of the commonest principles of political economy, that rice is forbidden to be exported from Luconia when its price is above a certain limit". III. The Dutch. After the Dutch had won their independence from Spain they turned thsir attention to the Asiatic poss- essions of their ancient opressors. Malacca, the Spice Islands, and other places having been taken, seventeen Dutch ships appeared off Macao in 1622. They were def- initely repulsed. This was, of course, a movement on the part of the Dutch to get the trade privileges denied them by Spanish and Portuguese jealousy. Their first attempt in this direction, was as early as 1607. A foot- hold on the mainland seeming impossible, in 1624 they ■ 16 established themselves on the Pescadores Islands, lying between Formosa and the mainland. Here they became an annoyance, not only to their European rivals, but also to the Chinease authorities. They built a fort and enslaved and ill-treated the natives. The matter was finally settled by the sending of one Von Mildert to Amoy, and thence to the governor of Fuhkien. The Chinese offered to trade privileges on condition that the- Dutch would remove to Formosa. The proposition was not immediately accepted, says Williams, but the fact remains that in the same year of the establishment in the Pescadores Fort ZeaL&nd, or Zealandia,was built, on the west coast of Formosa. The Chinese had not the slightest claim to Formosa; in fact, they hardly knew anything about it. The Dutch extended their sway with difficulty. Religious teaching which was helping them, was discon- tinued (I) because the Japanese were at that time very inimicial to missionary work, and their good will (I) Williams. 101 3 . . IT and their trade was a matter of first importance to the Dutch. Difficulties were increased and complicated by the Manffihu ctpnqsasst . During the ensuing disorders Chinese in great numbers MuSd to Formosa. The Dutch than rather conciliating them tried to keep them out. And still the trade with China remained trifling Probably this was the main source of discouragement to the trading Dutch. In 1653 Schedel was sent to Canton. He returned with the suggestion that it would be well to send an embassy to Peking. Upon this the Dutch East India Company saw fit to act, in 1655 sending two Batavian . merchants , Goyer and Keyzer. Nieuhoff, the author of " The Chinese Repository" was steward of the Commission. The envoys humiliated themselves without stint, and were giranfced the valuable privilege of sending an embassy with four trading ships once in every eight years. Jesuit influence is said to have worked against them. The only practical result was Nieuhoff's account of the expedition, - which desseminated an amount of information about China and Chinese. • . • ( 9 18 About the same time that the Commission left China ( -165.2 J , began the trouble with Koshinga. The following account of the conqueror is taken from Davis, who has abridged it from the second volume of Nieuhioff's Chinese repository, Koshinga, Koxinga, Ching Ching-kung, or Kuo-shing was the son and successor of a successful sea captain, who was one of the last to hold out against the Manchus. When his father went over to the Tartars , , Koshinga being in command of the fleet, held true to the cause of the Chinese. It was because of the hopeless- ness of this cause that his eyes were turned upon Formosa Coyet, the Dutch governor, of that island, getting wind of the chieftain's designs, had up twelve ships from Batavia. Everything being in readiness to withstand an attack,, Koshinga was requested to declare himself for peace or for war. He wrote a most lovely reply, and sent over some merchant vessels. The fleet sailed away, Coyet was called a foolish coward, and a certain 61enk started out to succeed him (1661). This was, of course, ■ 19 KosMnga*s moment. He. landed with twenty thousamd picked men, and threw four thousand into a position to cut communications between the two forts. Two hundred and forty men were sent out to dislodge him; about one half of whom returned. One ship was burned by a Shine se fire-raft. Another set out for Batavia. A parley was held at which Koshinga said: "Formosa had always belonged to China; and now that the Chinese wanted it, the foreigners must quit the island immediate- ly. If not let them ofcly hoist the red flag." In the morning the red flag was flying. Then follows a sdBge of nine months. Koshinga gathered all the Dutch from the surrounding country. He then sent a certain *93f RetVi Mr. Hambrocock, whose wife and daughters were among the captives, to demand the surrender of the garrison, threatening as an alter- native, the massacre of all he held prisoners. Hambrocock exhorted the besi.-eged to keep up the fight, saying the Koshinga* s resources were giving out. ? 30)1 - ■ 20 He went back to his wife and daughters and delivered to Koshinga a message of defiance. All the Dutch male prisoners, some five hundred, were then slain. Nor were the children spared, nor the women, except those whom the Barbarians chose to reserve. Ten ships and seven hundred men came from Batavia. The offensive was assumed. It is impossible to say whether by collusion with Koshinga or not, the governor of Fuhien wrote to Koyet asking him to send forces to join with his own to defeat Koshinga 1 s men on the coast, and promising then to aid in driving him out of Formosa. A remarkable piece of folly sent away five ships. As soon as they were gone, the attack was re- doubled. Three of them were lost at sea; the others returned. A desertar pointed out to Koshinga the weak places in the fortifications. The Dutch surrendered. In this siege about sixteen hundred men lost their lives. The evacuation took place in 1662. Koshinga became an independent sovereign, but in 1683 his grandson surrendered Formosa to Manchu dynasty. 1 8*1811 [ itt ill 21 Twelve vessels were sent out from Batavia under the command of a certain Bortt who brought them tb the mouth of the river IQLn, before the end of 1662. His offer to the Tartar's, of aid against the Chinese, seems to have been but suspiciously accepted, yat after leav- ing Rashinga for some time, he returned to Batavia for a larger force. This aided the Man chus materially in the taking of Amos and the complete subjugation of the province. In return the government had the gener'o osity to loan Bort two jjunks for an expedition against Formosa. That captain took his fleet back to Batavia. The counsel at that place now thought the time ripe for an embassy to the Emperor himself. Accordingly Van Hoorn arrived at Fu-chau in 1664. He was fairly well received, but his journey to Peking was postpones until the disposal of his cargo. Meanwhile, the Dutch seized upon a Chinese junk laden with bullion from Java. The necessity of restitution caused further delay. When about one year after the arrival af Fuchau Van Hoorn 22 and his suite came to Peking by way of the river 3JEJUI and across the mountains to Hangchau, they were com- manded to bang their heads on the floor before an einpty- throne* They complied. They were then told that this act of prostration caused their nation to be en- rolled among the tributaries of the grand Khan and that it was the will of their liege lord thaft they should go away. There seems to have been no further attempts at ' diplomatic correspondence for over a century. It was just after Macarteney 1 s stiff 3a@cek: that had brought him apparent failure^ Van Braam consular agent at Canton, forgetting Van H&ann 1 s experience came to the conclusion that the opposite of the English envoy 1 s method would be the successful one. Plis com- mission was therefore as humble and conciliating as possible. The Chinaman had lots of fun. Williams speaks thus of the Dutchmen; "They were brought to the capital like malafactors, treated when there like beg- gars and then sent back to Canton like mountebanks to trf* ; 23 perform the three times three prostration at. all times, and before everything their conductors saw fit; who on their part stood iiy and laughed at their embarrassment in making these evolutions in their tight clothes. " The whole affair was disgraceful, even allowing for the prejudice in favor of the English method which natur- ally affects Williams account of It. After a skating exhibition which they gave the emperor they were: sent from his table some broken meat on a dirty plate. The commission which left Canton in 1793 and returned in April 1.7, '96 was headed by Isaac Titsing, Van Braem being nominally his second. IV. The English. The English whose trading telatlons with China are of most importance, were late in coming. Not only late but severely handicapped by the ill-will of their European fore-runners. The Dutch and the Portuguese did their best to keep them out altogether. Peeling . 24 themselves too weak to effect this by direct means, they attempted it fcy prejudicing the Chinese. The naturally healthy growth of Chinese prejudice does not stand in much need of encouragement, Dutch ships with English pennant prominently displayed Eommitted acts of piracy upon Chinese trading vessels, which tended to undermine the celestial confidence in the cross of St. George. The "treaty of defence" between England and The Dutch in 1615 . which took cognizance of the bitter rivalry seems to have been ineffectual. The hostility of the Dutch and English traders continued until it. culminated in the fearful massacre of Amb<-Qi the same page the author quotes from a (I) despatch from Formosa dated Dec. 20,1683. Trade was reestablished at Amoy in 1685. About the time of the removal of trade from the Amoy the Company's headquarters were shifted from Bantam to Surat. Ships soon began to voyage directly from England to China. It was in this dacade (1680-1690) that the company began to make a more systematic and sustained effort i toward a Chinese establishment. It was the decade of the Child control, and the direction of his be ■ . , , X, '2 . . : T , ■ : ed 29 ships toward China was one of Sir Josiah's hobbies. Pie seemed to realize more than any man before him, the immense potentialities of the China trade. But the trade was not to be built up in a day. its grwwth was destined to be monotonously slow, and to be retarded by monotonously similar obstacles. The ship "Defense" appeared at Canton in 1689, and the Hoppo, or chief commissioner of customs, demamded the port-charge of tls. 2484. He finally got tls. 1500. Meanwhile, one of the crew had improved the time by killing a Chinaman. There was instantly a row, which resulted in the loss of several lives, but the Mandarins, fancying money more than revenge, announced that the "Defense", would not be allowed to sail until payment of tls. 5000 was made. When they had refused 3fex tls. 2000 the captain weighed anchor and sailed away. This early affair is an example of the continually recurring altercations which finally resulted in ambassies, pro- tests, and wars. In October 1700, a commission from the English East . 30 India Company arrived off Chusan in the "Eaton" frigate. It was found that the Mandarins dictated the prices of both investments and sails. It was probably this same ship that carried a consul's commission to the chief supercargo in Canton, Mr. C&tchpoole. (l) This was a curious episode, which seems to have teen completely lost sight of in later years. The letter from the Court of Directors to Mr. Catchpoole reads as follows; (2) "We have obtained a commission from his Majesty to constitute you, and those v/ho come hereafter, be appointed by us, as our President in China, to be the King*s minister, or consul for the English nation, with all powers requisite there- unto." There is no record of the nullification of these powers. This Mr. Catchpoole, according to Williams made a number of efforts to establish trade at Chusan, Hingpo, Amoy etc., but commerce had already begun to narroY/ down to Canton, and he met with /little or no success. (1) Williams (2) Davis. ' , , 31 at The English^Canton pegged away aid the most un- promising and patience-destroying task. At first they were compelled to conduct all their business through one man the "Emperor's merchant". They called him a "Monster in trade", but for a long time, he maintained control, farming out his privileges. But, despite everything, by 1715 intercourse had become fairly regular, the supercargoes lived and messed together while in Canton, and had formed themselves into a Coun.cal. By their united action, they had even routed the "Monster", and the outlook was brightening greatly when five years later his place was taken by an even more formidable foe, the co-Hong of the famoss Hong merchants. This was a monopolistic organization, even closer than the Council itself. Duties, port- charges, "presents", etc., were now heaped upon them, to such an extent, that in 1727, they threatened to leave , unless some of them were lifted. The Hoppo promised redress, and the next year laid on an extra ten percent duty. . 32 Naturally enough the trade fell away under such discouragements, until in 1734, only one ship went to Canton, Matters were improved somewhat when, on the accession of the Emperor Kienlung, in 1736, the ten per cent duty was cancelled. It was on the occasion of reading the edict to this effect in the Imperial Hall of Audiance, that the afterwards serious question of pros- trations first arose. The European traders unanimously and flatly refused refused to humiliate themselves. Prom this time to 1753, the train of events, although interesting enough, as, for example, the visit of Commo- dore Anson, in the "Centurion" on his circumnavigating voyage, the trouble between the English and French sai- lors, etc., had but little bearing on the trade develop- ments. At the end of this time we come to the first really significent man whose name has yet appeared. That is Mr. Flint. Mr. Flint first made himself notable by mastering the Chinese language. At a date variously ma 33 given from 1753 to 1755, Mr. Flint was sent on a miss- ion to try to re-establish the recently abolished fact- ory at Ningpo. He made apparently a very fair opening The Fooyuen (deputy-governor) made the greatest con- cession, but in doing so he seems to have exceeded his power, for when the w Holdernesse" came to take ad- vantage of them, an order was received from the Viceroy that she must be subjected to the same duties in force at Canton, and that all her arms, must be surrendered. The Fooyuen could not absolutely disobey, but did the next best thing by sending the order to Peking for cer- tification. In the meantime, however, he insisted on half the arms being surrendered, and proved himself faithless in his promise of ligbt duties, placing them even higher than those prevailing at Canton. More- over no shore-residence was permitted. According to Davis's account, the supercargoes left with the under- standing that no more trade was to be had, and found on arival at Macao an edict confining all commerce to Canton, Williams agrees, but Danvers makes the assertion that - I - 34 when, in 1759, Mr. Flint went out to Hingpo again to try- to re-establish trade, he was on his way before the above mentioned edict was published. At any rate, he v/ent, and found that he could get no hearing. He then made up his mind to proceed to Peking and appeal to the Emperor. An enterprise which the accredited and well supplied embassies of nations, had and were to find beyond their powers, seems a bold undertaking for a single unassissted man, perhaps, but sailing in a native vessel to Tien-tsin, he actually succeeded in getting his petition to the Emperor's attention. Moreover, the Emperor thought favorably of it, and sent an officer back to eanton with Mr. Flint. Two days after arrival he, with the local Mandarins, received the foreigners and told them that a new Hoppo had been appointed, and that all charges had iceen abolished, except six per cent on goods and the "present. " or cumshaw of tls. 1950 for each ship. This was certainly encouraging. It seemed as if the merchants were at last to experience rational treatment. 35 They were allowed to enjoy this impression for but very few days. Then the viceroy sent for Mr. Flint. The Council not only insisted upon accompanying him, tut also refused to enter one at a time. Until they reached the gate of the inner court, they were courteously treated. Then they were suddenly seized, hurried into the viceroy's presence and thrown down by by weight of numbers during the struggle caused by a forcible at- tempt was made to make them do the kutow . The viceroy when they had sufficiently proven their obstinacy, in- formed Mr. Flint that he was banished to Macao, with orders to return to England and stay there. He also casually remarked that the Chinaman who had written Mr. Flint's petition was about to be beheaded. Mr. Flint was then improsoned near Macao at a place called Casa Branca or Tsienshan, from March 1760 to Hov. 1762. He was fairly well treated and Williams says, told the Company that a fee of 250 lbs. to the viceroy would un- doubtedly buy feis liberty. But the officials with re- markable appreciation of Mr. Flint's abilities and ser- vices, simply concurred in the protest made by ;. . I ' 36 French, Dutch, Swedes and Danes, and. allowed the man who, up to that time, had done more than any other to develop trade in China, to be sent back to England. It is significant that the Portuguese did not even protest. Their insolence remaining unpunished, the Cantonese became more and more unbearable. The record of the years from 1762 to 1784, is simply a tale of overbear- ance, squabbles, occasional free fights between sailors and populace, diminution of trade, and every increasing ©nmity, culminating in the noted "gunner's case" in 1784. Ships were searched on the pretense that they might contain foreign women who were forbidden. One of his Majesty's ships, the "Argo", Capt. Af fleet was actually compelled to submit to measurement by the Mandarins. An Englishman named Scott having been accused of the murder of a Chinaman, was delivered up to thee threat- ening Chinese authorities by the Portuguese, although they admitted their certainty of his innocence. In 1780 a French sailor killed a Portuguese in a quarrel and was given up by the French minister to Chinese justice. He was publicly strangled. This was the first instance of ( ' ■ . 37 Chinese authority being exercised to punish a crime committed by one foreigner against another. It estab- lished a most unfortunate precident • Chinese ideas of seeking out the truth of accusations were limited. If one of the foreign devils were killed, all the better if another could be disposed of. Affairs like that of xk Captain Mc Clary etc. will have to be brushed aside, tempting as they are. Revenons a nos moutons. In 1767 the Hong raised the price of tea and thereby increased the silk trade. Tea plants were imported to Fort Malborough. In the same year the Franch East India Company began its two years ex- istance in China. In 1770 the Company greatly strengthened its organization by arranging that its supercargoes should take permanent residence in China instead of remaining as heretofore, only during the sailing season. This enabled cargoes to be brought up during the winter. (Danvers follows this statement with the remarkable one 58 that in the next year the supercargoes by a payment of tls. 100,000 procured the dissolution of the Co-Hang. No other authority makes the slightest mention of such an occurrance, and the Co-HOng figured so largely in later times that its abolition was one of the stipu- lations of the treaty of Nankin in 1842. The mistake is inexplicable). In 1778 the organization was further increased by the establishment of a Ruling Committee of which the President was a member, called the Select Committee. Later, 1781, it was" altered to compose of the President and six others. In 1791 & 92, it was aga again changed upon the establishment of a Secret and Superintending Committee in addition, of which the President was also a member. The Company in fact being the only English or- ganization, began to arrogate to itself control of all Englishmen in China whether employes of the Company, or not. A test case arose in 1780, that of Mr. George Smith, it was decided that the Council was authorized to send away from China any private citizen of whose , . I 39 presence they disapproved, (l) But some of this is rather in the nature of antic- ipation. In 1784 there occurred bnt an accident not very much unlike many other s/ but important in its results. This was the "gunners case". The "Lady Hughes" a country ship (2) in firing a salute, acci- dentally hit a chop-boat and injured three Chinamen, one of whom died The gunner who fired the gun, terri- fied at the probable results of his carelessness, took refuge in the Company's Factory, A wuyuen or deputed Mandarin demanded his surrender, of the chief of the factory, Mr, Pi g.osa, saying the man was evidently innocent but that he must be examined, Mr. Pigan said he had no objections if her were examined in the factory . Two days one later the wuyuen reappeared with ^ankhegua and the same demand. The "Lady Highes" was not a Company vessel but Mr. Pi^u said that he would do what he could to get Mr. Smith her supercargo to produce him for ex- amination in the factory. At first the Chinese maintained OBl - 40 that the examination must take place regularly before Fooyuen, of the city, but finally pretended to agree. They then took the first opportunity to kidnap Mr, Smith, barracad the avenues leading to the river and cut off Whampoa. The matter was finally arranged by giving up the gunner to be tried in Mr, Smiths place. Kim they kept awhile and then incontinently strangled. It was this outrage together with the large sums of money owed by the Hong merchants to the Company, and the desire to build up a tea trade that led to the determination upon an Embassy. set out Accordingly in 1787, an Embassy headed by the Hon. Lieut. Col. Cathcart in H. M. S. Vestal, but by the time it had reached the Sunda Strait (between Sumatra and Java) its leader died and the vessel put back to England. January 12, 1792 Mr. Pitt informed the Directors that Lord Macartney was to be sent on a mission to China. The Directors do not seem to have been I< . 1 * 41 enthusiastic .They expressed their doubts, but voted 30,000 lbs. toward expenses. Sir George Staunton, who accompanied Lord Macartney, as Secretary and Minister Plenipotentiary in his absence, gives a three volume account of the mission. It includes "notice of the several places amff where they stopped, on the way out A home; being the Islands of ;$a$ie^3, leneriff and St. Jago; the Port, of Rio de Janiero, in South America, the Islands of St Helena, etc. etc.", but, nevertheless, is not entirely devoid of some useful information. Winterbotham another contemporary authority, who made a volume on China out of his experiences with the Embassy, gives a very unsatisfactory account of the business of the Mission. Staunton brings out very clearly that it was not entirely the desire to straighten out the troubles of Canton, to arrange the debts owed by the Hong (I) merchants, and to assert the injured dignity of the J> ; 42 ( I) Macpherson "History of Commerce" Vol. Ill , p. 655 gives the following foot-note: " A letter from Canton, dated 15th January 1780 states the amount of the debt to be 3,8o8,075 dollars; the memorial of the agents of the dreditors in 1778 stated it to be 1,000,000 lbs; and Mr. Smith's account of the debts raised the total to 2,025,863 lbs. sterling? Considering the high reputation for commercial probity, which the Chinese now seem to enjoy, this was rather a remarkable state of affairs. 43 English crown that was the occasion of the mission, but that tea was an important factor. Tea was becoming such a popular beverage in England that England could not afford to be on ill terms with the source of supply. The Embassy apparently accomplished nothing. Although Macartney found the old Emperor intelligent and well disposed, the Colao and the other jealous ministers effectually blocked all attempts to speak of business. On the whole, the foreigners were treated with great courtesy. Macarteney in the velvet scarf of a Knight of the Bath, and Staunton in the scarlet Laws rob© of an Honorary Doctor of which costumes Staunton explains were worn as a concession to the Chinese dislike of tight fitting clothes - together with the magnificent silks of the court, must have presented a dazzling spectacle. The whole importance of the mission, and it is not slight, as may seem, may be summed up in the two facts that when Macarteney approached the throne, instead of doing the heretofore indispensible KutQW, 44 he merely sank on one knee in the manner customary before an European sovereign, and that the Emperor accepted his casket of presents with his qwo. .hdnd. Trivial as these points may seem, they do not lack significance. Some dignity, for the first time, was conceded to a European visitor. The quiet prevailing at Canton for some years later (first broken by the Providence affair in 1800 ), goes to prove that even from a purely mate- rial point of view, Macarteney's efforts were not ineffectual. Note.- For the train of events from here on through Amherst's Mission, the events leading up to the Opium War, and the account of that war itself, with its imme- diate results, see the companion thesis by Lewis S. Palen This account re- commences with the year 1847. — PART II. From 1847 through the Exchange of ratifications at Peking, Hovember 5th, 1860. 45, Part II . Chapter 1* Prom 1847 to arrival of Lord Elgin, July 6,185 7. The Treaty of Naniin would seem to have put affairs in China on the highroad to peaceful and natural development. So it would have, had its terms been honestly and literally fulfilled. But the Chinese, though famous for commercial probity, took long to learn anything like good-faith in diplomatic matters. Canton, in spite of the express terms of the treaty, was not made free of access. The English authorities in Hong Kong were not allowed %x> uninterrupted aiid direct communication with the Chinese authorities in Canton. These points after all are the ones to be remembered. They relate to matters of principle. The outrages and insults leading to the somewhat inadequate climax of the "Arrow" affair, provoking, even maddening, as some of them were, were incidents which allowed of indi- divual redress. Nevertheless, they must be followed through, as in every case they form the causae proximae, and give . 1 II •1 Bel ■ ■ i . ■ ' - . ,10 - 46 immediate excuse of the recourse to arms. In March 1847, a party of gentlemen (among them an officer of the Royal Artillery) was attacked while on a excursion up the Canton river. Sir John Davis was governor of Hong Kong. On previous occa- sions his demands to Keying, the Chinese governor, commissioner or viceroy at Canton, for redress of simil- ar outrages, had met with indifference or rudeness. This time he seems to have had instructions from home. A dispatch ordered him to demand the instant punishment of the mob leaders and intimated to the Chinese author- ities that,** if "they would not fcy tha exacfcise of their own power, punish and prevent such outrages, the British government would he obliged to take the matter into their own hands, and it would not be their fault, if in such case, the innocent were involved in the punishment sought to be inflicted on the guilty." (I) (I) Davis, Vol. II_, P. 169. . 47 Y/hich intimation when conveyed to Keying, produced no effect. Sir John therefore determined to send a military expedition to Canton, to bring Keying to his senses. On the 3rd of May the English merchants drew up a list of their demands which ran as follows: recognition of the right to make one day trips, coming and going, into the country; fifty acres for ware-houses and dwellings; a site for a church and churchyard; a burial-place for the Parsees (who were the rich opium merchants of Hong Kong) ; a bridge to connect the two factory gardens; a cook-house for Lasearg; the railing in of lower China Street, and the freedom of the garden walls from Chinese buildings; and the removal of the stationary boats which encumbered the river approaches to the factory gardens. (I) To enforce these demands, Gen. d'Aguilar, commanding the troops at Hong Kong, with the squadron under the command of Captain M'Dougal, proceeded up the Canton river, taking every fort on the (I) An. Reg. 1847. • 48 ray to Canton, without the loss of a man, and, indeed, with very little fighting. He destroyed all the ammu- nition he found, and spiked the guns ( about 875 ) . The negotiations entered into were perfectly satisfactory and the expedition, entirely successful, returned to Hong Kong on the eighth day after starting, Nevertheless, when an the 5th of December of the same year, another party of gentlemen went up the river, they came to a village called Hmng-chu-kee , which had posted declarations that if any J£isr«i -tse, (foreign devils) came thither, it would slay them and their guides This word was kept. The mutilated bodies were not recovered until several days later. On the 12th Sir John Davis came up from Hong Kong. On the 20th four of the criminals ( the manner of whose identification to the foreigners is not explained) were executed in the presence of the British officials. As recompense for his decisive actions Sir John Davis was succeeded by Mr. (afterwards Sir George) BojJham, as Plenipotentiary in 1848, Lord Russel's .%:.-. :y- 49 cabinet was alrarmed at Davis somewhat high-handed pro- ceedings in the previous year. The Colonial Secretary, Earl Gr&y, reversing Lord Palmers ton's policy, "peremp- torily forbad any further offensive operations to be undertaken against the Chinese without the previous sanction of the government. These instructions Bonham carefully followed. Only once in 1852, when Dr. (after- wards Sir John) Bowring was temporarily promoted from his consulship at Canton to act for Bonham in his ab- sence, was any mo#e made toward insi stance on the right of access to Canton. He wrote at length to Lord Clarendon ( 19 Apr. 1852 ) (I) The only result was a rebuke from the Foreign Secretary Lord Malmesbury who simply told him to "avoid all irritating discussions with the Chinese" and abstain from mooting the question of the rights of British subjects to enter into the city of Canton." (2) But, as Lane-Poole remarks, " Bowring did not change his opinion; he merely postponed its execution. (1) Text. given in Lane-Poole Vol. I p. 161 from PaEl. Papers 1857 (C. 1173) P. 3 - 9 (2) Same Pari. Papers 1857 ( C. 2173) P. 10 - ■...-. 1 ■ : ■ 50 Therefore, when, early in 1854, Bowring received from Lord Clarendon, now became Foreign Secretary, a dispatch containing the following passages, it was evident that Bowring T s opportunity had arrived. The dispatch in- formed him of his appointment as Plenipotentiary and Chief Superintendent of British Trade in China, and by way of instruction said "There are unquestionably points which it would be desirable to secure , and to which we have even a right by treaty; and among these I would mention free and unresrtrained intercourse with the Chinese authorities and free admission into some of the cities of China, especially Canton." (I) With this encouragement Bowring immediately began a correspondence with Commissioner Yen > Viceroy Governor at Canton, which led to nothing. The excuse for this action did not have to be long awaited. It came with the famous "Arrow affair." So heated was the controversy to which this matter led that it is very difficult to find out just what the 51 facts were. However, they sift down to something like these (I) two According to a colonial ordinance^ ships owned by British subjects were required to be enregistered yearly. The Colonial Legislature of Hong Kong moreover took it upon itself to grant registers to Chinese ship owners whom it chose to consider as quasi-naturalized because they had become tenants of crown lands. This quite contrary to English law which required that if a ship would receive the protection of the English flag, it must not only be owned by a British subject, but also that a certain proportion of its crew must be composed of English British subjects. The "Arrow" a small vessel described as a "Lorcha" (1) This account taken mainly from the Annual Register for 1856. The succeesing volume contains a recapitula- tion which is simply a defense of the action taken by the English authorities. (2) Quoted An. Reg. 1856 52 was owneeL by a Chinese resident of Hong Kong. It was commanded by an Englishman, but its entire crew of fourteen &&, consisted of Chinamen. Nevertheless, in accordance with custom, it had been granted a British register, which expired Sept. 26th, and flew the English flag. On the 8th of October 1856, while lying at Canton, she was suddenly boarded by Chinese officials in search of a native pirate. Whether her English master was at the time on board, and whether the English flag was flying, are mooted questions; but the weight of evidence seems to be that the flag, at least, was flying and was pulled down by the officials. All of her crew but two were seized and imprisoned. Mr. Parker, British Consul at Canton, as soon as he heard of the matter went to the junk containing the prisoners and demanded that they be brought to the Consulate for examination. This being refused, he wrote a similar demand to Commissioner Yeh, Vice-roy, or Governor at Canton, and dispatched the news to :o ve- iw rtt nO to. rio n .t&n B . 53 Sir. John Bowring, the British governor at Hong Kong. Bowring wrote back, "It appears on examination that the Arrow had not right to hoist the British flag;-- But the Chinese had no knowledge of the license; - - - you will inform the Imperial Commissioner that I require an apology for what has taken place and an assurance that the British flag shall in the future be respected; that forty-wight hours are allowed for this communication which being passed, you are instructed to call on the naval authorities to assist you in forcing redress." (I) Bowring than wrote to Yeh. "whatever repre- sentations may have been made to your Excellency, there is no doubt that the Lorcha Arrow lawfully bore the British flag under a register granted by me &c. " (2) which does not well accord with his own admission to Parkeis, that the register had expired. Yeh in his reply stated that no foreigner was seen on the vessel when it (1) An. Reg. 1856, full text given (2) Same, full text given. . B OB 3 -i At) ■ ' ' I oJ J ■ - ' -, 54 was boarded nor was the English flag visible. He also protested generally against the issuance of registers to Chinese owners. It being made evident that Yen would make no reparation unless there was some display of force, Bowring called upon Admiral Sir Michael Seymour to seize a Chinese junk. This proving insufficient, H. M. S. Coromandel and a squadron of gun boats proceeded to take a number of the fortifications below Canton, and to bum some buildings. On the 25th Oct. the Dutch Folly Port, on an island opposite the city was taken. Commissioner Yeh then becamse more amenable to reason. He offered to surrender all of the men except two whom he claimed as pirates. He then sent them all back with the demand that the pirates be immediately returned. The re turn, however, was made quietly and with a careful avoidance of anything like the appearance of apology. Mr. Parker refused to receive the men, saying that they must be returned to the Arrow as publiely as they had been removed, and that Yeh must offer an apology. . , ■ oiq , 55 From this point the Arrow episode ceases to be the important issue. It. ceased to be such at. the moment Sir John Bowring instructed Mr. Parked to write Yeh the additional demand that all foreign representatives be allowed the same free access to Canton as was en- joyed at the other four treaty ports. The claim was justly enough based on the treaties and conventions beginning with the Treaty of Nankin, but it is doubtful whether the moment was well chosen for insi stance upon it. The provocative cause was not. openly replaced by the underlying one. This was soon realized, even by those actively concerned. Mr. Parke© declared it plainly, when in an interview with the Canton merchants on November 15th, he said that if, "simple reparation for the outrage in the Arrow case had been all we required, the Admiral would doubtless have been long ago satisfied with what had been done, but that a principle was at stake which could not be abandoned." TW V TXOO ' - 56 The demand being made upon Yeh, was completely ignored. Therefore Admiral Seymour on the 21st opened fire, shelling some of the government buildings (among them Yen's residence) and a body of Chinese troops, which took position on some rising ground in the rear of the city. Yeh offered a reward of thirty dollars for the heads of Englishmen. On the 29th a breach was made in the walls and a body of marines and sailors succeeded, with small loss, in blowing up the city gate. The city was then ^entered and Yen's house taken poss- ession of, but the troops were withdrawn at sunset. Yeh was invited to a conference, but refused. On the 3rd of November the attack was renewed, more government buildings being destroyed, while on the 5th a large fleet of war junks lying under the protection of the French Folly Fort, was destroyed and the fort silenced. Seymour's demand upon the Bogue Forts met with the answer from the commanding mandarin that surrender would mean for him decapitation, so he preferred to fight. These forts mounting four hundred or more guns, were ' . ■ a ' . M ; Off blij i 8 1 i 68 on the Europeans and their affairs, (I) but one, at least, which afterwards proved useful. Peh-Kirsri,; the governor of the city and the Tartar general whose name is given by tfcre English as ftaaat- -Tseang-Ksieji ., and by the French as Muh, and variations thereon, were also taken, Yeh was sent to Calcutta as a prisoner on board H. M. S # "Inflexible." Peh-KSv*!.. was put in charge of the city with a European tribunal to aid him and to watch him. The blockade was then raised, factories settled to be placed in the suburbs, at a point opposite the -Dutdh Polly Fort, a small occupying force was left, and the rest of the expedition withdrew. The four plenipotentiaries drew mp a joint note to the Emperor, asking that commissioners be appointed to (I) See memorial address to the Emperor by Keying the previous commissioner, quoted by Moges pp. 145-151 and Fisher 40-43. Also report of conversation between Emperor and Ki-Shuli-tsan ex-judge of Kwang tung, quoted by Oliphant, Vol. I. pp. 100-111. ■ I i • ■ , 69 meet them at Shanghai , M. de Contades and Mr. Oliphant(I) started with it for Peking. They went as far as Soo- Chowri and the despatches were forwarded thence to Peking. The Embassies then proceeded to Shanghai. Where they received an answer from Yu , the senior minister. He did not condescend to write personally (despite treaty agreements) but sent a message through the local governor that one Kwang had been appointed to succeed Yeh at Canton, and that they had best return thezre and treat with him. The Russians, however, were invit- ed to meet a Tartar magistrate at the mouth of the Black Dragon or Amour. It was immediately determined to proceed toward Peking. 6fi the 14th of April, 1858, the mouth of the Peiho -the river leading up to Peking - was reached. H©re another demand was made for commission- ers, this time to meet the Ambassadors at Taku . (I) Attaches to the special Ambassy of France and England. 9m ■ J" b Jb OB 70 Three of them came to Tan, T sung - lun ,- and :Pu . Because they could not produce any commsiion delegating to them full powers, Elgin and his associates would not, at first, treat with them. However, later, to gain time, while the gun boats beat up and down the coast against adverse winds, Tan was informed of the objects of the mission, and there was some show of diplomatic discussion and conference, Meanwhile, the Chinese continued to strength- en their fortifications. Finally there were anchored about the mouth of the Peiho, some inside and some outside, the bar, fifteen English ships containing more than two thousand men, and eleven French ships, besides two American frigates, and Count Putiative's conveyance, the the little side-wheeler^ "Amerika ■"• Then, on the 20th of May, the Forts were bombarded, stormed and taken in short order, and with very little loss from the fire of the Chinese, although the explosion of a magazine after the Chinese had fled, caused a frightful disaster among the French. ; e - I 100 ■ . . is:. 71 The envoys then made their way up the river to Tien-tsin, where they took residence in "The Temple of Supreme Felicity," somewhat feelingly described by Mr. Oliphant, whither they were immediately followed by Count Putiative and Mr. Heed, and whither come two fully qualified ambassadors, Kwailang., and Hwashana. The first interview, however, of Lord Elgin with these gentlemen terminated abruptly. In the course of the ceremonies of meeting, he discovered that the Commiss- ioners were unprovided with a certain seal of office termed the Kwang-fang. They explained that this was only conferred on those holding permanent office, and not upon temporary Commissioners, such as themselves. Lord Elgin, however, having now had some experience with the methods of Chinese diplomacy, stated that without the Kwang-fang, the negotiations could not proceed, and left. It seems that the commissioners had hit hh nearer the truth than is customary in Chinese official :tct . eii 72 life, and they were really in somewhat of a quandary. Plowever, after consultations with Mr. H. IT. lay, who by virtue of his position under the Chinese governfiaant as Inspector of Customs at Shanghai, was more in their confidence than any other European, they finally suc- ceeded in getting the Kwang-fang down from Peking. (I) Matters then went smoothly enough until the sudden and unexpected arrival of Keying, the mandarin, who had preceded Yeh at Canton, and who had negotiated the treaty of Nankin with Sir Henry Pottinger. He was now a very old man. At first he presented himself in no official capacity, but later, obtained an Imperial appointment as third commissioner. Then he began to make trouble. The other commissioners were for peace, and concessions; he was for war and no concessions. (I) Oliphant - the only account I discovered of the Kwang - fang episode - not mentioned by 7&>ges, and irrecognizably mixed up elsewhere. lltia 800 I • | .■■■.. t sosoq 10 1 13- e: ■ ■ n y x Moreover, he worked to incite the population of Tien-tsin It. became necessary to quiet him. Among Yen's papers discovered in Canton by Mr. Parke s, was a memorial ad- dressed by Keying to the Emperor. It spoke in very plain terms of the "blindly unintelligent" barbarians and how he was hoodwinkailg them. (I) This document was turned over to the Commissioners. Plwashana read it aloud. Poor old Keying was so frightened that he immediately left for Peking, where he was incontinently invited to quaff a cup of poison. As the invitation was conveyed by autograph decree from the Emperor, it was accepted. Unsuccessful celestial statesmen travel a rough road. Yeh was immediately degraded after the capture of Canton, and Tan when the Allies passed the Taku forts, not only lost his tea honors, and titles, but was sent into exile in the interior. Nothing further occurred to interrupt the process of negotiations until the 26th of June. Mean while, (on the 14th) the Russian treaty was signed, gaining the right (I) Pull text given by Oliphant Vol. I pp. 359-366 and elsewhere. : ft $£ t t01©: B JW 73 of correspondence on an equal footing between the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Prime Minister or First Minister of the Council of State at Peking; per- mission to send diplomatic agents thither on special occasions (mpon which point, however, it is to be noted that the text of the treaty distinctly puts it that envoys may be sent whenever the Russian government sees fit ,) (I) liberty of circulation throughout the Empire of Missionaries only under a system of pass-ports and the right to trade at ports athen open with the addition of Swatow, a port in Formosa, and one in Hainan. Dodd alone makes the statement that a large area near the mouth of the Amour was ceded. Hoges and Oliphant, although they were on the ground, and attached to the Franch and English embassies, seem to know nothing of this. The point is not without interest, especially as the Sprun.er -Hanks Atlasgives the Amour territory as being ceded in 1858. (I) Martens , Re cui el des Trait es. ton ( «j 38 hboa ■ ■ • 74 Reference to the text in Martens, proves this erroneous, though not without its excuse and its element of truth. A fact of importance has teen overlooked in all the books dealing with this question from the Anglo-French point of view. It is this. In May 16-28 there was made at Anghoun a treaty by Nicholas Muriatviev and Prince I -Chan, a treaty, the first article of which began as follows: "La rive gauche du fleuve Amour s partir de la riviere Arg-Roun jusqu f a 1* embouchure de 1* Amour appartiendra a 1* empire de Russie, at sa rive droite en aval jusqu 'a la kh riviere Oussouri appartiendra a l'empire Ta-Tsing; les territoires et endnoits situes entre la riviere Oussouri et la mer comme jusqu»a present seront possedes par l'enpire Ta-Tsing et 1* empire de Russie en attendant que la frontiere entre les deux Etats y soit reglee." The treaty of Tien-tsin did not settle this matter, although one of its articles states that such ■ eb i : r , rH e 'ieH 't A on 1)116 J 6 i m ' 1 - nt« ;^.2JjH « I 75 regulation shall be the subject of an additional article. TTo such additional article is recorded, but by another treaty, made at Anghoun in 1861, the matter was settled and the territory definitely ceded to Russia. There was certainly clever diplomatic work going on for Russia, while the borad-sides of England and Prance were thunder- ing. The American treaty granting practically the same general concessions, was signed four days later. ' Dodd takes a ^ittle fly at the United States in speaking of this, saying her attitude was "more courteous than threatening, more submissive than dignified." Tn England's negotiations -fehere was on the 26th of June, what threatened to be a serious hitch. There were two points upon which Elgin placed great insistence; the right of a British Minister to reside permanently at Peking, and the right of British subjects to travel freely for trading purposes in all ports of the Empire. Perceiving that they pled in vain with the be.; , '. te eb£± , $aiJ . ifIB 101 n. JLICW ! 160 - . .rfw t •92 el rafrttfu :8q ertt 76 English Ambassador, the Chinese Commissioners appealed to the representatives of the other nations to impose inform Lord Elgin that they had received an Imperial decree from Peking, informing them that their heads would be the price of their agreement to these concess- ions. The rumor, of Keying 1 s death had just arrived, and it seemed hard to subject these well-disposed commissioners to the same fate. Lord El gin, however, finally decided that the matter was of too great import- ance to allow the interference of personal motives. Moreover, the appeals for mercy might be a ruse. After some hesitation, therefore, he declared that he would not recede from his position. The treaty was signed with elaborate ceremonies on the 26th of June 1858 (I) The French treaty was signed the next day. The following is a resume 1 , with the more important provisions quoted. (I) Kweilang and Hwashana escaped with their lives. . . 77 (I) Treaty between Her Majesty and the Emperor of China. Signed in the English and Chinese languages at Tien-tsin, June 26. 1858. "Pier Majesty the Queen of fcfce Brited Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and his Majesty the Emperor of China, being desirous to put an end to the existing misunderstanding &c. - - - have named as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say:- Her Majesty the Queen of Great Britain and Ireland, the Right Honorable, the Earl of Elgin, and Kincardine, a Peer of the United Kingdom, and a Knight of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. And his Majesty the Emperor of China, the High Commissioner Kweiliang a Senior Chief Secretary of of State, styled the East Cabinet, Captain - General of the Plain White Banner of the Manchu Banner Force, Superintendant-General of the Administration of Criminal Law; and Hwashana, one of His Imperial Majesty's ex- positors of the Classics, Manchu President of the Office (I) Annual Register 1859, pp 206- vv : to , 78 for the regulation of the Civil Establishment Caplains General of the Bordered Blue Banner of the Chinese Banner Force and Visitor of the Office of Interpretation; Have agreed upon and concluded the following Articles I. Treaty of Hank in .renewed; Supplementary Treaty and General Regulations of Trade Abrogated. II. Her Majesty may appoint Ambassadors, Ministers or other diplomatic agents to the Court of Pekin; and his Majesty the Emperor may likewise appoint Ambassadors etc. to the Court of St. James. III. His Majesty the Emperor of China hereby agrees that the Ambassador, Minister or other Diplomatic Agent, so appointed by Her Majesty the Queen of Great Britain, may reside with his family and establishment permanently at the capital, or may visit it occasionally, at the option of the British Government. He shall not be called upon to perform any ceremony derogatory to him, as representing the Sovereign of an independent nation on a footing of equality with that of China. On the other hand, he shall use the same forms of ceremony and • • . I ', . . ' 79 respect to His Majesty the Emperor, as are employed by the Ambassadors, Ministers or Diplomatic Agents of Her Majesty towards the Sovereigns of independent and equal European nations. "It is further ggreed that Her Majesty's Government may acquire at Pekin a site for building or may hire houses for the accommodation of Her Majesty's Mission, and that the Chinese Government will assist it in so doing. Her Majesty's Representative shall be at liberty to choose his own servants and attendants - - - Any person guilty of disrespect ot violence of His Majesty's Representative, or any member of his family, or establishment, in deed or icord, shall be severely punished." IV. " It is further agreed that no obstacle or difficulty shall be made to the free movements or Her Majesty's Representative, and that he and the persons of his suite may come and go, and travel at their send pleasure. He shall moreover leave full liberty to and receive his correspondence, -----; and, generally igH to a t r ■ - - - T -- 80 he shall enjoy the same privileges as are accorded to officers of the same rank by the usage and consent of Western nations." V. The Emperor agrees to nominate one of the Secretaries of State, or a President of oiie of the Boards with as the high officer^ whom the Ambassador, Minister or other Diplomatic Agent of Her Majesty the HJueen shall transact business either personally or in writing, on a footing of perfect equality." VI. Her Majesty extends some privileges to Diplomatic Agents of the Emperor of China to her Court. VII. Her Majesty may appoint Consuls to reside in the open ports. Consuls shall rank as Intendants of Circuits; Vice-Consuls, Acting Vice-Consuls, and In- terpreters, with Prefects. VIII. The Christian religion, as professed by Roman Catholics and Protestants, shall be allowed to be taught. IX. British subjects to be allowed under a system of passports to travel for business or pleasure in all .:lo " . . IV : : - .. 81 ports of the interior. Persons without pass-ports to be turned over unharmed to the nearest Consul. No pass- ports needed for excursions not exceeding 100 li and for a period not exceeding five days from an open port. This article does not apply to ships crews. X. British Merchant ships authorized to trade on the Yang-tsz (Great River) - Upper and lower valley however being disturbed with out -laws no port opened bu Chinpiang, which shall be opened a year from signing of this treaty. Also upon restoration of peace, British Minister shall bhoose three ports below Han - Konir. XI. In addition to the five ports opened by Treaty of Nankin, it is agreed that British subjects may fre- quent the ports of New Chang , Tang - 6hou, Tai - Wan (Formosa), Chan - Chow (Suatoa) and Kieung-Chtfw (Haini^n) . XII. British Subjects may buy land for sx ware- houses, churches, hospitals, residences, burial grounds, at the prevailing rates. _ 60 • . iioq 3 "1 . becteqp ■ - it x& ' — ft"T • — ,8f)J | - i)X£ - 82 XIII. British Subjects may employ Chinese subjects in any lawful capacity. XIV. British subjects may hire boats for goods or passengers and there shall be no monopoly in regard to either boats or coolies. XV. All questions arising between British subjects shall be subject to British jurisdiction. XVI. Chinese guilty of criminal acts toward British subjects shall be arrested and punished by the Chinese authorities, according to the laws of China, and vice versa. XVII. Matters of complaint between British and Chinese shall be referred to the Consul, for amicable settlement, and in case of failure on his part alone, he shall request assistance of the Chinese authorities. XVIII. The Chinese authorities shall at all times protect British subjects from insult and violence, and shall promptly punish incendiarism and robbery. XIX. Chinese authorities shall capture and punish pirates offending against British ships. ■ • .r blTB , OTq 83 XX. British subjects ship -wrecked on the Chinese coast shall be succored, received friendly treatment, and if necessary, receive means of transportation to the nearest consular station, XXI. Chinese criminals refugeeing at Hong Kong on board British ships, or in the houses of British subjects shall be given up on due requisition by the Chinese authorities. XXII. Each of the contracting parties agrees to arrest and enforce the payment of debts of any of its subjects abscounding against subjects of the other. XXIII. Chinese trading in Hong Kong and owing debts shall be dealt, with on the spot by the English Courts of justice; if they abscond thence the Chinese authorities shall see justice done. XXIV. The Tariff rates strictly, and nothing more, shall be demanded on imports and exports. XXV. Import duties payable on landing of goods, export on shipment. XXVI. Tariff fixed by Act. X. Treaty of Nankin, abrogated. Upon signature of this treaty , officers to i i ■ ' ? ■ •no I; ■ ■>. i , - e a J • enob er, ,ft£ . XX bits e .*n ' 3" r. :' t 84 be appointed by contracting parties to arrange a new one at Shanghai. XXVII. Either party may demand a revision of tariff at the end of ten years, but if within six months after the end of the ten years no such demand has been made, tariff shall continue for ten years more unchanged. XXVIII. whereas, according to the treaty of Nankin, British imports having paid the regular tariff duties, were to be transported into the interior unburdened, save by a transit duty, and whereas such duty being of no specified amount, led to much dispute and dissatis- faction; four months from the signing of this treaty, the authorities charged with the collection of such duties, shall declare their exact rates and a notifica- tion thereof shall be published in English and Chinese. But it shall be at the option of any British subject transporting goods from place of production to place of shipment, to clear them once for all by the payment of 2 l/2 $ ad valorem. This in no way to affect tariff duties on imports and exports. - -u .' .Lit ©itt c j siew - ■ J I. to to ' 85 XXIX. Arrangement for tonnage dues and certif- icate of clearance. XXX. Ditto XXXI. Ditto XXXII. Concerning beacons and light-houses. XXXIII. Duties to be paid to the Bankers appointed by the Chinese government, either in Sycee, or in foreign money, according to the assay made at Canton July 13, 1845. XXXIV. Standard weights and measures. XXXV. Pilots. XXXVI. Customs officers to reside upon and protect incoming ships without fees. XXXVII. Report of incoming ships to consul and Superintendent of Customs. XXXVIII. Permit to open hatches, from Consul. XXXIX. Ditto, from Superintendent of Customs. XL. Transhipment permits. XLI. Port clearance. ■ : ni to : idi . .. - 86 XLII. Appeal to highest price merchants would pay in case of disagreement over ad val Oram duties XLIII. Fixing of tare. XLIV. Damaged goods same appeal as XLII. XLV. Reexportation, draw- back certificates etc, XLVI. Smugling left to Chinese authorities. XLVII. British vessels entering any other than open ports shall be subject to confiscation by the Chinese government. XLIX. All such penalties belomg to public service of Chinese government. L. All official communications to be written in English with Chinese translation. In case of dif- ference, English version to prevail. Applies to this Treaty. LI. Agreed that henceforth the character "I" (barbarian) shall not be applied to the English in any Chinese official document. LI I, British ships of war to visit any port for provisions etc. , 110 - A f\ rr Ck •* c "¥ . . . | , voiq ' 87 LIII. Concerted measures to be taken against piracy. LIV. " Most favored mation" clause . LV. Indemnity clause to be added, LVI • Ratifications to be exchanged at Peking within one year from the day of signature " In token whereof the respective Pleni- potentiaries have signed and sealed this treaty. " Done at. Tien-tsin this twenty sixth day of June in the. year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-eight; corresponding with the Chinese date, the sixteenth day, fifth moon, of the eighth year of Hi en Fung. (E S) Elgin and Kincardine ( Signature of 1st Chines©' PI enip ot ent iary ( ■ " 2nd " ( Seal of Chinese Plenipotentiary) , ' . ■ - ' ■ 88 Separate article :- Agreed to pay an indemnity of two million taels - the British troops to evacuate Canton when it is paid. ( Signed as above ) :©s 1860 The Honorable Frederick Bruce G, B., brother of El&in, was appointed to be Minister to China, in accordance with highly rated privilege won at Tien-tsin. His instructions were moderate. He was not to insist on his right of residence at Peking, but was "for the pre sent, at least, "to make Shanghai his headquarters, and conduct the oversight of English affairs in China from that point, Sir John Bowring at Hong Kong being super- seded. However, he was to go to exchange ratifications in the Treaty of Tient-sin, in fact, he was specially instructed not to he tempted to exchange them elsewhere. At this time, the China Station was established as a post in the English navy, consequently, Admiral Seymour who had been in command of the East India Station (then including the China eoast) was succeeded by Admiral Hope, who was appointed to the new China Station. He was instructed to escort Mr. Bruce with an adequate force, to • ■' - • ■ ani • • . -. . a nx 90 the Peiho, which he was to ascend in a British ship of war. Reaching Hong Kong in May, 1859, he was joined by the French Ambassador il.de Bourbonlon, bent on the same errand. At Shanghai the evidence of Mr. Bruce* s instructions was illustrated* Kweilamg and Hwashane were waiting there with the proposition to exchange the ratifications on the spot and then make an overland journey to Peking. Mr. Bruch refused and with M. de Bourboiilon, and Admiral Hope and a squadron of some nineteen vessels, mostly gun-boats, (I) proceeded up into the Gulf of Pechile to the mouth of the Peiho, where he arrived on the 18th of June. The river was found to be obstructed with iron cables and the forti- fications much strengthened. Boats sent on shore to announce the approach of the plenipotentiaries and desire that the obstructions be removed, were met by a sort of armed mo£, which, refusing to permit a landing, seated (I) Seven steamers, ten gun-boats, and two transports, two French ships. ■ ' ■ * I • ■ • I eiorl;. , 91 the fortifications and abstructions constituted a meas- ure of defense against pirates, and that they being militia not directly under the control of Peking, had received no instructions concerning the arrival of Ambassadors, would take messages to Peking. However, they appeared to make no particular objections when Admiral Hope requested that the river be opened in three days, - except that they failed to honor the request, and calmly went about further strengthening of the defenses. Patience exhausted, the envoys on the 21st asked the Admiral to employ force - Hope gave warning, and on the night of the 24th, blew up part of the obstructions. The next day the gun-boats went over the bar. Immediately they came within close range, the Talfcu forts opened fire. A number of batteries hitherto mashed with matting, added unex- pected force to the fusilade. This unexpected strength and the unusual precision with which the Chinese gunners aimed, resulted in the almost immediate dis~ - ablement of tifcBc four gun-boats. Admiral Hope was ' - J i ! • • - I [ . .. 92 severely wounded • The ships continued to engage the forts and then a storming party made a lamentable at- tempt. They were caught by a series of three mud-ditches in which the men were fairly slaughtered.. Out of the eleven hundred men landed, four hundred thirty-four were put "hors de* combat". It was on this occasion that the American Commodore Tatual , with his famous signal, "Blood is thicker than water", went under fire, to tate up reserves and rescue the men struggling in the mud. Admiral Hope behaved with great gallantry and determination, even after he was wounded, (I) but was compelled to report to the ministers his inability with his small force, to clear the river. The envoys and their convoy, consequently withdrew to Shanghai. (I) See Rennie P. 5 - account of eye-witness. Also report of eye-witness An. Reg. (265-266) For the Chinese point of view, read the report submitted to Emp. by "Sing- ko-len-sin Prince of Potolekutai of the Korchiii tribe An. Reg. ( 166 - 267 ) • 93 Such was the overture to the third war with China At first, the feeling in England seem$rppr; ■ :» LOAN DEPT, 00 A M AY 2 tP Vt M «3$ **. 5 1 MAR 2 7 196$ 3 RECP LP MAR^ APR 1 2 yo W ^ lflttl»mHi>ftM «nw2 * 1974 1 "' LD 21A-6*0m-3,'65 (P2336sl0)476B B CD CIHC UE PT APR 2 5 'Mi* GeneralLibrary University of California Berkeley UBRA SJwH?CH BORROWED RETUR N TO DBSKFROM WHICH LOAN DEPT. t D 62A-50m-7,'65 ^?5756sl0)9412A «gtfpSSg-u UoiversKy^^