RESSkSS-. ^-^CONSTANTl N\«'A.VgI SilnuiiiifluuiinMfflraiiniiiMiMU! » t *_• yr^^^^^STO RY <^ rm NAlldNSte== m m y! ^ [•••#•»••»»»•»•••••#»••»•••#•••»••••♦••»•»*< (/^ f i-yvn iJ ''VW /8^ THE STORY OF THE NATIONS J2MO, ILLUSTRATED. PER VOL., $1.50 THE EARLIER VOLUMES ARE THE STORY OF GREECE. By Prof. Jas. A. Harrison THE STORY OF ROME. By Arthur Gilman THE STORY OF THE JEWS. By Prof. Jas. K. Hosmer THE STORY OF CHALDEA. By Z. A. Ragozin THE STORY OF GERMANY. By S. Baring-Gould THE STORY OF NORWAY. By Prof. H. H. Bovesen THE STORY OF SP.\IN. By E. E. and Susan Hale THE STORY OF HUNGARY. By Prof. A. VAMBfiRv THE STORY OF CARTH.\GE. By Prof. Alfred J. Church THE STORY OF THE SARACENS. By Arthur Gilman THE STORY OF THE MOORS IN SPAIN. By Stanley Lane-Poolb THE STORY OF THE NORMANS. By Sarah O. Jewett THE STORY OF PERSIA. By S. G. W. Benjamin THE STORY OF ANCIENT EGVPT. By Geo. Rawlinson THE STORY OF ALEXANDER'S EMPIRE. By Prof. J. P. Mahaffv THE STORY OF ASSYRIA. By Z. A. Ragozin THE STORY OF IREL.\ND. By Hon. Emily Lawless THE STORY OF THE GOTHS. By Henry Bradley THE STORY OF TURKEY. By Stanley Lane-Poole THE STORY OF MEDIA, BABYLON, AND PERSIA. By Z. A. Ragozin THE STORY OF MEDIyEVAL FRANCE. By Gustave Masson THE STORY OF MEXICO. By Susan Hale THE STORY OF HOLLAND. By James E. Thorold Rogers THE STORY OF PHCENICIA. By George Rawlinson THE STORY OF THE HANSA TOWNS. By Helen Zimmern THE STORY OF EARLY BRITAIN. By Prof. Alfred J. Church THE STORY OF THE BARBARY CORSAIRS. By Stanley Lane-Poolb THE STORY OF RUSSIA. By W. R. Morfill THE STORY OF THE JEWS UNDER ROME. By W. D. Morrison THE STORY OF SCOTLAND. By John Mackintosh THE STORY OF SWITZERLAND. By R. Stead and Mrs. A. Hug THE STORY OF PORTUGAL. By H. Morse Stephens For prospectus of the series see end of this volume G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS, NEW YORK AND LONDON GBSauiRARY W"«VR»TY or CALIFORNIA, SAN DKGO LA JOUA, CALIFORNIA INTERIOR OF ST. SOPHIA. Wayne S. Vucinlch mt |torg of tht Ifations THE STORY OF THE Byzantine Empire C. W. C. OMAN, M.A., F.S.A. FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE, OXFORD ; AUTHOR OF " WARWICK THE KINGMAKER," " THE ART OF WAR IN THE MIDDLE AGES," ETC. NEW YORK G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS LONDON: T. FISHER UNWIN 1892 Copyright, 1892 By G. p. Putnam's Sons Entered at Stationers' Hall By T. Fisher Unwin "Cbc IRnickcrbocfscr ffrcsg PREFACE. Fifty years ago the word " Byzantine " was used as a synonym for all that was corrupt and decadent, and the tale of the East-Roman Empire was dis- missed by modern historians as depressing and monotonous. The great Gibbon had branded the successors of Justinian and Heraclius as a series of vicious weaklings, and for several generations no one dared to contradict him. Two books have served to undeceive the English reader, the monumental work of Finlay, published in 1856, and the more modern volumes of Mr. Bury, which appeared in 1889. Since they have written, the Byzantines no longer need an apologist, and the great work of the East- Roman Empire in holding back the Saracen, and in keeping alive throughout the Dark Ages the lamp of learning, is beginning to be realized. The writer of this book has endeavoured to tell the story of Byzantium in the spirit of Finlay and Bury, not in that of Gibbon. He wishes to acknow- ledge his debts both to the veteran of the war of VI PREFACE. Greek Independence, and to the young Dublin pro- fessor. Without their aid his task would have been very heavy — with it the difficulty was removed. The author does not claim to have grappled with all the chroniclers of the Eastern realm, but thinks that some acquaintance with Ammianus, Procopius, Maurice's " Strategikon," Leo the Deacon, Leo the Wise, Constantine Porphyrogenitus, Anna Comnena and Nicetas, may justify his having undertaken the task he has essayed. Oxford, February^ 1892. CONTENTS. Byzantium PAGK I-I2 Foundation of Byzantium, 3 — Early history of the city, 5 — Byzantine luxury, 7 — Byzantium destroyed A.D. 196, 9 — Taken by Maximinus, 1 1 . II. The Foundation of Constantinople (a.d. 328- 330) ^3-30 Constantine the Great, 15 — Constantine's Choice, 17 — The Topography of Constantinople, 19 — The Senate House, 21 — The Hippodrome, 25 — St. Sophia, 27 — Constantine's Dedi- cation Festival, 29. III. The Fight with the Goths 3^-44 The Goths and the Huns, 35 — Valens and the Goths 37- Outbreak of War, 39 — Battle of Adrianople, 41. IV, The Departure of the Germans 45-53 Stilicho, 47 — Alaric the Goth, 49 — Gainas slain, 51 — Exile of Cbrysostom, 53. X CONTENTS. PAGE The Reorganization of the Eastern Empire (a.d. 408-518) 54-64 Youth of Theodosius II., 55— Exile of Eudocia, 57— Reign of Marcianus, 59 — Zeno reorganizes the Army, 61 — Rebelhon of Theodoric and his Departure for Italy, 63. VI. Justinian 65-80 Theodora, 67— Justinian's personal character, 69 — Justinian's Army, 71 — Justinian's foreign policy, 73 — The Blues and Greens, 75 — The Nika Riot, 77 — Theodora's speech, 79. VII. Justinian's Foreign Conquests ... . 81-97 Weakness of the Goths in Italy, 83 — Conquest of Africa, 85 — Theodahat's augury, 87 — The Goths besiege Rome, 89 — Belisarius takes Ravenna, 91 — Baduila reconquers Italy, 93 — Death of King Baduila, 95 — Justinian's Spanish Con- quests, 97. VIII. The End OF Justinian's Reign . . . 98-113 Fall of Antioch, 99 — The Great Plague, loi — Justinian as Theologian, 103 — Belisariusdefeats the Huns, 105 — Building of St. Sophia, 107— Procopius on St. Sophia, 109 — Justinian's Forts, III — His Legislation, 113. IX. The Coming of the Slavs .... 1 14-127 The Lombards, 115 — Lombard Conquests in Italy, 117 — Rise of the Papacy, 119 — Persian Wars, 121 — The Slavs, 123 — Their Invasion of Moesia, 125 — Fall of Maurice, 127. CONTENTS. XI PAGE The Darkest Hour 128-140 Misfortunes of Phocas, 129 — Accession of Heraclius, 131 — The Letter of Chosroes, 133 — Victories of Heraclius, 135 — First Siege of Constantinople, 137 — Triumph of Heraclius, 139. XI. Social and Religious Life (a.d. 320-620) 141-157 Decay of the Latin tongue, 143 — Christianity and the State, 145 — Christianity and Slavery, 147 — Evils of Monasticism, 149— Superstitions, 151 — Weaknesses of Byzantine Society, 153 — Estimate of Byzantine Society, 155-57. XH. The Coming of the Saracens . . . 158-172 Rise of Mahomet, 159 — Arab Invasion of Syria, l6l — Jerusa- lem taken, 163 — The Sons of Heraclius, 165 — The Themes created, 167 — Wars of Constans II., 169 — Reign of Con- stantine IV., 171. XIII. The First Anarchy 173-183 Justinian II., 176 — Usurpation and Fall of Leontius, 177 — Restoration of Justinian II., 179 — Anarchy, 711-17 A.D., 181 — Accession of Leo the Isaurian, 183. XIV. The Saracens Turned Back . . . 184-188 Constantinople beleagured. 1S5 — The Siege raised, 187, xii CONTENTS. XV. PAGE The Iconoclasts (a.d. 720-802) . . . 189-201 Superstitious Vanities, 191— Leo's Crusade against Images, 193 — Constantine V. dissolves the Monasteries, 197 — Irene blinds her son, 199 — Coronation of Charles the Great, 201. XVI. The End of the Iconoclasts (a.d. 802-886) 202-214 Reign of Nicephorus I., 203 — Reign of Leo V., 205 — Michael the Amorian, 207 — Persecution by Theophilus, 209 — The choice of Theophilus, 211— Michael the Drunkard, 213. XVII. The Literary Emperors and their Time (a.d. 886-963) 215-225 Reigns of Leo VI. and Constantine VII., 217 — Leo's Tactica, 219 — Art and Letters, 221 — The Commerce of Constanti- nople, 225. XVIII. Military Glory 226-239 Decay of the Saracen power, 227 — Conquests of Nicephorus Phocas, 229 — Capture of Antioch, 231 — Murder of Nicephorus I., 233 — ^John Zimisces defeats the Russians, 235 — Triumph of Zimisces, 237 — Death of Zimisces, 239. XIX. The End of the Macedonian Dynasty . 240-248 The Bulgarian Wars, 241 — Death of King Samuel, 243 — The Empress Zoe and her Marriages, 245-7. CONTENTS. xiii XX. PAGE Manzikert (a.d. 1057-1081) . . . 249-257 The coming of the Seljouks, 251— Misfortunes of Romanus Diogenes, 255— Character of Alexius Comnenus, 257. XXI. The Comneni and the Crusades . . 258-273 Norman War, 259 — Battle of Durazzo, 261 — The Crusades, 263 — Conquests of Alexius I., 265 — Second Norman War, 267 — Reign of John Comnenus, 269 — Wars of Manuel I., 271 — Fall of Andronicus I., 273. XXII. The Latin Conquest of Constantinople . 274-293 Misfortunes of the Angeli, 275 — Cyprus and Bulgaria lost, 277 — The Fourth Crusade, 279— The Leaders of the Crusade, 281 — Rising against the Franks, 285 — The two Sieges of Con- stantinople, 287— The Franks enter Constantinople, 289 — Plunder of the City, 291 — The End of Alexius Ducas, 293. XXIII. The Latin Empire and the Empire of Nicaea (a.d. 1204-1261) 294-306 Baldwin I. slain in Battle, 295 — The Smaller Latin States, 297 — Successes of Theodore Lascaris, 299 — John Vatatzes conquers Thrace, 301 — Usurpation of Michael Paleologus, 303 — The Franks driven from Constantinople, 305. XXIV. Decline and Decay (a.d. i 261-1328) . 307-320 Weakness of the restored Empire, 309 — Commercial Decay, 311 — Rise of the Ottoman Turks, 313 — Turkish Wars of Andronicus II., 315 — Roger de Flor, 317 — Asia Minor lost, 319- XIV CONTENTS. XXV. The Turks in Europe PAGB 321-331 Orkhan the Turk, 323 — Revolt of Cantacuzenus, 325 — Con- quests of the Servians, 327 — The Turks cross into Europe, 329 — Siege of Philadelphia, 331. XXVI. The End of a Long Tale (a.d. 1370-1453) 332-350 Reign of John Paleologus, 333 — -Turkish Civil Wars, 335 — Murad II. attacks Constantinople, 337 — Death of Manuel II., 339— John VI. at Florence, 341— Mahomet II. attacks Con- stantinople, 343 — Apathy of the Greeks, 345 — Last Hours of Constantine XI., 347 — Fall of Constantinople, 349. Index 351 ^^^^ra ^ f^MESi^ 3^^ S ^^^i^^ ^^^^^^^^B ^^ ^ 1^ rTWfff^ftdl .»^tt ^^^K^^B ^p SPv-^S ^8 ^^^E i^ ^^^^^SS^a ^^r ^ LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE INTERIOR OF ST. SOPHIA Frontispiece. EARLY COIN OF BYZANTIUM 4 LATE COIN OF BYZANTIUM SHOWING CRESCENT AND STAR 4 CONSTANTINE THE GREAT 14 MAP OF THE HEART OF CONSTANTINOPLE . . . 20 THE ATMEIDAN [hIPPODROME] AND ST. SOPHIA . 23 BUILDING A PALACE (FROM A BYZANTINE MS.) . . 26 FIFTEENTH-CENTURY DRAWING OF THE EQUESTRIAN STATUE OF CONSTANTINE 28 GOTHIC IDOLS (FROM THE COLUMN OF ARCADIUS) . 33 GOTHIC CAPT.IVES (FROM THE COLUMN OF ARCADIUS) . 43 ANGEL OF VICTORY (FROM A FIFTH-CENTURY DIPTYCH). FROM "l'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 58 THE EMPRESS THEODORA AND HER COURT (FROM " L'ART BVZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883) 68 THEODORA IMPERATRIX (FROM THE PAINTING BY VAL PRINSEP. THE COPYRIGHT IS IN THE ARTIST'S HANDS) 78 XVI LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE CAVALRY SCOUTS (FROM A BYZANTINE MS.)- FROM "l'ART BVZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 86 DETAILS OF ST. SOPHIA ...... 96 COLUMNS IN ST. SOPHIA I08 GALLERIES OF ST. SOPHIA IIO CROSS OF JUSTINUS II. (FROM THE VATICAN). FROM "l'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 118 GENERAL VIEW OF ST. SOPHIA (FROM "l'ART BYZANTIN." PAR C. BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883) . . . I46 ILLUMINATED INITIALS (FROM BYZANTINE MSS.). FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR C. BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 152 CHURCH OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES AT THESSALONICA (FROM " l'ART BYZANTIN ." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883) 1 76 BISHOPS, MONKS, KINGS, LAYMEN, AND WOMEN, ADOR- ING THE MADONNA (FROM A BYZANTINE MS.). FROM "l'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 191 REPRESENTATION OF THE MADONNA ENTHRONED (FROM A BYZANTINE IVORY). FROM " l'aRT BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 . 19S DETAILS OF ST. SOPHIA 2(XI BYZANTINE METAL WORK (OUR LORD AND THE TWELVE APOSTLES). FROM "l'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 209 A WARRIOR-SAINT (ST. LEONTIUS) (FROM A BYZANTINE FRESCO). FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883 .... 223 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. xvii PAGE RETURN OF A VICTORIOUS EMPEROR (FROM AN EM- BROIDERED robe), from " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883 . . 232 ARABESQUE DESIGN FROM A BYZANTINE MS. (FROM '* L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 236 RUSSIAN ARCHITECTURE FROM BYZANTINE MODEL (CHURCH AT VLADIMIR). FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 . 238 OUR LORD BLESSING ROMANUS DIOGENES AND EUDOCIA (FROM AN IVORY AT PARIS). FROM " L'ART BYZAN- TIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 253 NICEPHORUS BOTANIATES SITTING IN STATE (FROISI A CONTEMPORARY MS.). FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883 . 255 BYZANTINE IVORY-CARVING OF THE TWELFTH CENTURY (FROM THE BRITISH MUSEUM). FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 266 HUNTERS (FROM A BYZANTINE MS.). FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883 270 VIEW OF CONSTANTINOPLE. (FROM THE SIDE OF THE HARBOUR) • 283 BYZANTINE RELIQUARY (FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883) . • 289 FINIAL FROM A BYZANTINE MS. (FROM " L'ART BYZAN- TIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883 299 FOUNTAIN IN THE COURT OF ST. SOPHIA . . .3^2 XVlll LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. BYZANTINE CHAPEL AT ANI, THE OLD CAPITAL OF ARMENIA (FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883) . . . • 3^2 ANDRONICUS PALEOLOGUS ADORING OUR LORD (FROM "l'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883) 316 JOHN CANTACUZENUS SITTING IN STATE (FROM A CON- TEMPORARY MS.). FROM "L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883 . . 326 MANUEL PALEOLOGUS AND HIS FAMILY (FROM A CON- TEMPORARY MS.). FROM "l'ART BVZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883 . . 335 ARABESQUE DESIGN FROM A BYZANTINE MS. (FROM "L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1883) 33^ DETAILS OF ST. SOPHIA 345 ANGEL OF THE NIGHT (FROM " L'ART BYZANTIN." PAR CHARLES BAYET. PARIS, QUANTIN, 1 883) . . 350 THE STORY OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE. BYZANTIUM. Two thousand five hundred and fifty-eight years ago a little fleet of galleys toiled painfully against the current up the long strait of the Hellespont, rowed across the broad Propontis, and came to anchor in the smooth waters of the first inlet which cuts into the European shore of the Bosphorus. There a long crescent-shaped creek, which after-ages were to know as the Golden Horn, strikes inland for seven miles, forming a quiet backwater from the rapid stream which runs outside. On the headland, enclosed between this inlet and the open sea, a few hundred colonists disembarked, and hastily secured themselves from the wild tribes of the inland, by running some rough sort of a stockade across the ground from beach to beach. Thus was founded the city of Byzantium. The settlers were Greeks of the Dorian race, natives of the thriving seaport-state of Megara, one of 2 BYZANTIUM. the most enterprising of all the cities of Hellas in the time of colonial and commercial expansion which was then at its height. Wherever a Greek prow had cut its way into unknown waters, there Megarian seamen were soon found following in its wake. One band of these venturesome traders pushed far to the West to plant colonies in Sicily, but the larger share of the attention of Megara was turned towards the sunrising, towards the mist-enshrouded entrance of the Black Sea and the fabulous lands that lay beyond. There, as legends told, was to be found the realm of the Golden Fleece, the Eldorado of the ancient world, where kings of untold wealth reigned over the tribes of Colchis : there dwelt, by the banks of the river Thermodon, the Amazons, the warlike women who had once vexed far-off Greece by their inroads : there, too, was to be found, if one could but struggle far enough up its northern shore, the land of the Hyper- boreans, the blessed folk who dwell behind the North Wind and know nothing of storm and winter. To seek these fabled wonders the Greeks sailed ever North and East till they had come to the extreme limits of the sea. The riches of the Golden Fleece they did not find, nor the country of the Hyper- boreans, nor the tribes of the Amazons ; but they did discover many lands well worth the knowing, and grew rich on the profits which they drew from the metals of Colchis and the forests of Paphlagonia, from the rich corn lands by the banks of the Dnieper and Bug, and the fisheries of the Bosphorus and the Maeotic Lake. Presently the whole coastland of the sea, which the Greeks, on their first coming, called FOUNDATION OF BYZANTIUM. 3 Axeinos — " the Inhospitable " — became fringed with trading settlements, and its name was changed to Euxeinos — " the Hospitable " — in recognition of its friendly ports. It was in a similar spirit that, two thousand years later, the seamen who led the next great impulse of exploration that rose in Europe, turned the name of the " Cape of Storms " into that of the " Cape of Good Hope." The Megarians, almost more than any other Greeks, devoted their attention to the Euxine, and the foundation of Byzantium was but one of their many achievements. Already, seventeen years before Byzantium came into being, another band of Megarian colonists had established themselves at Chalcedon, on the opposite Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus. The settlers who were destined to found the greater city applied to the oracle of Delphi to give them advice as to the site of their new home, and Apollo, we are told, bade them " build their town over against the city of the blind." They therefore pitched upon the headland by the Golden Horn, reasoning that the Chalcedonians were truly blind to have neglected the more eligible site on the Thracian shore, in order to found a colony on the far less in- viting Bithynian side of the strait. From the first its situation m.arked out Byzantium as destined for a great future. Alike from the mili- tary and from the commercial point of view no city could have been better placed. Looking out from the easternmost headland of Thrace, with all Europe behind it and all Asia before, it was equally well suited to be the frontier fortress to defend the border 4 BYZANTIUM. of the one, or the basis of operations for an invasion from the other. As fortresses went in those early days it was almost impregnable — two sides protected by the water, the third by a strong wall not commanded by any neighbouring heights. In all its early history Byzantium never fell by storm : famine or treachery accounted for the few occasions on which it fell into the hands of an enemy. In its commercial aspect the place was even more favourably situated. It com- pletely commanded the whole Black Sea trade : every EARLY COIN OF BYZANTIUM LATE COIN OF BYZANTIUM SHOWING CRESCENT AND STAR. vessel that went forth from Greece or Ionia to traffic with Scythia or Colchis, the lands by the Danube mouth or the shores of the Maeotic Lake, had to pass close under its walls, so that the prosperity of a hun- dred Hellenic towns on the Euxine was always at the mercy of the masters of Byzantium. The Greek loved short stages and frequent stoppages, and as a half-way house alone Byzantium would hav^e been prosperous : but it had also a flourishing local trade of its own with the tribes of the neighbouring Thracian inland, AS AN INDEPENDENT STATE. 5 and drew much profit from its fisheries : so much so that the city badge — its coat of arms as we should call it — comprised a tunny-fish as well as the famous ox whose form alluded to the legend of the naming of the Bosphorus.i As an independent state Byzantium had a long and eventful history. For thirty years it was in the hands of the kings of Persia, but with that short exception it maintained its freedom during the first three hun- dred years that followed its foundation. Many stirring scenes took place beneath its walls : it was close to them that the great Darius threw across the Bosphorus his bridge of boats, which served as a model for the more famous structure on which his son Xerxes crossed the Hellespont. Fifteen years later, when Byzantium in common with all its neigh- bours made an ineffectual attempt to throw off the Persian yoke, in the rising called the " Ionic Revolt," it was held for a time by the arch-rebel Histiaeus, who — as much to enrich himself as to pay his seamen — invented strait dues. He forced every ship passing up or down the Bosphorus to pay a heavy toll, and won no small unpopularity thereby for the cause of freedom which he professed to champion. Ere long Byzantium fell back again into the hands of Persia, but she was finally freed from the Oriental yoke seventeen years later, when the victorious Greeks, fresh from the triumph of Salamis and Mycale, sailed up to her walls and after a long leaguer starved out ' See coin on opposite page. The Bosphorus was supposed to have drawn its name from being the place where lo, when transformed into a cow, forded the strait from Europe into Asia [BovQ-Trnpog]. 6 BYZANTIUM. the obstinate garrison [B.C. 479]. The fleet wintered there, and it was at Byzantium that the first founda- tions of the naval empire of Athens were laid, when all the Greek states of Asia placed their ships at the disposal of the Athenian admirals Cimon and Aristeides. During- the fifth century Byzantium twice declared war on Athens, now the mistress of the seas, and on each occasion fell into the hands of the enemy — once by voluntary surrender in 439 B.C., once by treachery from within, in 408 B.C. But the Athenians, except in one or two disgraceful cases, did not deal hardly with their conquered enemies, and the Byzantines escaped anything harder than the payment of a heavy war indemnity. In a few years their commercial gains repaired all the losses of war, and the state was itself again. We know comparatively little about the internal history of these early centuries of the life of Byzantium. Some odd fragments of information survive here and there : we know, for example, that they used iron instead of copper for small money, a peculiarity shared by no other ancient state save Sparta. Their alphabet rejoiced in an abnormally shaped B, which puzzled all other Greeks, for it resembled a TT with an extra limb.^ The chief gods of the city were those that we might have expected — Poseidon the ruler of the sea, whose blessing gave Byzantium its chief wealth ; and Demeter, the goddess who presided over the Thracian and Scythian corn lands which formed its second source of prosperity. ' See coin on page 4, BYZANTINE LUXURY. The Byzantines were, if ancient chroniclers tell us the truth, a luxurious as well as a busy race : they spent too much time in their numerous inns, where the excellent wines of Maronea and other neighbour- ing places offered great temptations. They were gluttons too as well as tipplers : on one occasion, we are assured, the whole civic militia struck work in the height of a siege, till their commander consented to allow restaurants to be erected at convenient distances round the ramparts. One comic writer informs us that the Byzantines were eating young tunny-fish — their favourite dish— so constantly, that their whole bodies had become well-nigh gelatinous, and it was thought they might melt if exposed to too great heat ! Probably these tales are the scandals of neighbours who envied Byzantine prosperity, for it is at any rate certain that the city showed all through its history great energy and love of independence, and never shrank from war as we should have expected a nation of epicures to do. It was not till the rise of Philip of Macedon and his greater son Alexander that Byzantium fell for the fifth time into the hands of an enemy. The elder king was repulsed from the city's walls after a long siege,culminating in an attempt at an escalade by night, which was frustrated owing to the sudden appearance of a light in heaven, which revealed the advancing enemy and was taken by the Byzantines as a token of special divine aid [B.C. 339]. In commemoration of it they assumed as one of their civic badges the blazing crescent and star, which has descended to our own days and is still used as an emblem by the present 8 BYZANTIUM. owners of the cily^the Ottoman Sultans. But after rcpulsint,^ Philip the Byzantines had to submit some years later to Alexander. They formed under him part of the enormous Macedonian empire, and passed on his decease through the hands of his successors- Demetrius Poliorcetes, and Lysimachus. After the death of the latter in battle, however, they recovered a precarious freedom, and were again an independent community for a hundred years, till the power of Rome invaded the regions of Thrace and the Helles- pont. Byzantium was one of the cities which took the wise course of making an early alliance with the Romans, and obtained good and easy terms in conse- quence. During the wars of Rome with Macedon and Antiochus the Great it proved such a faithful assistant that the Senate gave it the status of a dvi/as libera et foedemta, " a free and confederate city," and it was not taken under direct Roman government, but allowed complete liberty in everj'thing save the con- trol of its foreign relations and the payment of a tribute to Rome. It was not till the Roman Republic had long passed away, that the Emperor Vespasian stripped it of these privileges, and threw it into the province of Thrace, to exist for the future as an ordinary provincial town [a.d. 73]. Though deprived of a liberty which had for long years been almost nominal, Byzantium could not be deprived of its unrivalled position for commerce. It continued to flourish under the Pax Roinana, the long-continued peace which all the inner countries of the empire enjoyed during the first two centuries of BYZANTIUM DESTROYED A.D. I96. g the imperial jrgime, and is mentioned again and again as one of the most important cities of the middle regions of the Roman world. But an evil time for Byzantium, as for all the other parts of the civilized world, began when the golden age of the Antonines ceased, and the epoch of the mili- tary emperors followed. In 192 A.U., Commodus, the unworthy son of the great and good Marcus Aurelius, was murdered, and ere long three military usurpers were wrangling for his blood-stained diadem. Most unhappily for itself Byzantium lay on the line of division between the eastern provinces, where Pes- cennius Niger had been proclaimed, and the Illyrian provinces, where Severus had assumed the imperial style. The city was seized by the army of Syria, and strengthened in haste. Presently Severus appeared from the west, after he had made himself master of Rome and Italy, and fell upon the forces of his rival Pescennius. Victory followed the arms of the Illy- rian legions, the east was subdued, and the Syrian emperor put to death. But when all his other adherents had yielded, the garrison of Byzantium refused to submit. For more than two years they maintained the impregnable city against the lieu- tenants of Severus, and it was not till A.D. 196 that they were forced to yield. The emperor appeared in person to punish the long-protracted resistance of the town ; not only the garrison, but the civil magistrates of Byzantium were slain before his eyes. The massive walls " so firmly built with great square stones clamped together with bolts of iron, that the whole seemed but one block," were laboriously cast down. The property lO BYZANTIUM. of the citizens was confiscated, and the town itself deprived of all municipal privileges and handed over to be governed like a dependent village by its neigh- bours of Perinthus. Caracalla, the son of Severus, gave back to the Byzantines the right to govern themselves, but the town had received a hard blow, and would have required a long spell of peace to recover its prosperity. Peace however it was not destined to see. All through the middle years of the third century it was vexed by the incursions of the Goths, who harried mercilessly the countries on the Black Sea whose commerce sus- tained its trade. Under Gallienus in A.D. 263 it was again seized by an usurping emperor, and shared the fate of his adherents. The soldiers of Gallienus sacked Byzantium from cellar to garret, and made such a slaughter of its inhabitants that it is said that the old Megarian race who had so long possessed it were absolutely exterminated. But the irresistible attraction of the site was too great to allow its ruins to remain desolate. Within ten years after its sack by the army of Gallienus, we find Byzantium again a populous town, and its inhabitants are specially praised by the historian Trebellius Pollio for the courage with which they repelled a Gothic raid in the reign of Claudius II. The strong Illyrian emperors, who staved off from the Roman Empire the ruin which appeared about to overwhelm it in the third quarter of the third century, gave Byzantium time and peace to recover its ancient prosperity. It profited especially from the constant neighbourhood of the imperial court, after Diocletian TAKEN BY MAXIMINUS. II fixed his residence at Nicomedia, only sixty miles away, on the Bithynian side of the Propontis. But the military importance of Byzantium was always interfering with its commercial greatness. After the abdication of Diocletian the empire was for twenty years vexed by constant partitions of territory between the colleagues whom he left behind him. Byzantium after a while found itself the border fortress of Licinius, the emperor who ruled in the Balkan Peninsula, while Maximinus Daza was governing the Asiatic provinces. While Licinius was absent in Italy, Maximinus treacherously attacked his rival's dominions without declaration of war, and took Byzantium by surprise. But the Illyrian emperor returned in haste, defeated his grasping neighbour not far from the walls of the city, and recovered his great frontier fortress after it had been only a few months out of his hands [a.d. 314]. The town must have suffered severely by changing masters twice in the same year ; it does not, however, seem to have been sacked or burnt, as was so often the case with a captured city in those dismal days. But Licinius when he had recovered the place set to work to render it impregnable. Though it was not his capital he made it the chief fortress of his realm, which, since the defeat of Maximinus, embraced the whole eastern half of the Roman world. It was accordingly at Byzantium that Licinius made his last desperate stand, when in A.D. 323 he found himself engaged in an unsuccessful war with his brother-in-law Constantine, the Emperor of the West. For many months the war stood still beneath the walls of the city ; but Constantine persevered in 12 BYZANTIUM. the siege, raising great mounds which overlooked the walls, and sweeping away the defenders by a constant stream of missiles, launched from dozens of military engines which he had erected on these artificial heights. At last the city surrendered, and the cause of Licinius was lost. Constantine, the last of his rivals subdued, became the sole emperor of the Roman world, and stood a victor on the ramparts which were ever afterwards to bear his name. ^^M ^^ S^H^^^ li^ ^ ^ ^^S^^^^ s^W^^r^^ 1^^^^^ ^^^ ^p||F^l3^^ ^^p i^^J ^^ PP^ m ^M i^^^^^y'^ p m 1 ^^^^ ^^ ^^^^ O^V 'ri^r« ^s Mm. i^ 11. THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. (A.D. 328-330-) When the fall of Byzantium had wrecked the fortunes of Licinius, the Roman world was again united beneath the sceptre of a single master. For thirty-seven years, ever since Diocletian parcelled out the provinces with his colleagues, unity had been unknown, and emperors, whose number had some- times risen to six and sometimes sunk to two, had administered their realms on different principles and with varying success. Constantine, whose victory over his rivals had been secured by his talents as an administrator and a diplomatist no less than by his military skill, was one of those men whose hard practical ability has stamped upon the history of the world a much deeper impress than has been left by many conquerors and legislators of infinitely greater genius. He was a man of that self-contained, self-reliant, unsympathetic type of mind 14 THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. which \vc recognize in his great predecessor Augustus, or in Frederic the Great of Prussia. Though the strain of old Roman blood in his veins must have been but small, Constantine was in many ways a typical Roman ; the hard, cold, steady, un- ( ^,.£9'^.-^,I^!!fIf.'^y.-^'ff^^. M CONSTANTINE THE GREAT. wearying energy, which in earlier centuries had won the empire of the world, was once more incarnate in him. But if Roman in character, he was anything but Roman in his sympathies. Born by the Danube, CONSTANTINE THE GREAT. 1$ reared in the courts and camps of Asia and Gaul, he was absolutely free from any of that superstitious reverence for the ancient glories of the city on the Tiber which had inspired so many of his predecessors. Italy was to him but a secondary province amongst his wide realms. When he distributed his dominions among his heirs, it was Gaul that he gave as the noblest share to his eldest and best-loved son : Italy was to him a younger child's portion. There had been emperors before him who had neglected Rome : the barbarian Maximinus I. had dwelt by the Rhine and the Danube ; the politic Diocletian had chosen Nicomedia as his favourite residence. But no one had yet dreamed of raising up a rival to the mistress of the world, and of turning Rome into a provincial town. If preceding emperors had dwelt far afield, it was to meet the exigencies of war on the frontiers or the government of distant provinces. It was reserved for Constantine to erect over against Rome a rival metropolis for the civilized world, an imperial city which was to be neither a mere camp nor a mere court, but the administrative and commercial centre of the Roman world. For more than a hundred years Rome had been a most inconvenient residence for the emperors. The main problem which had been before them was the repelling of incessant barbarian inroads on the Balkan Peninsula ; the troubles on the Rhine and the Eu- phrates, though real enough, had been but minor evils. Rome, placed half way down the long projection of Italy, handicapped by its bad harbours and separated from the rest of the empire by the passes of the Alps, i6 THE i'OVNDATlUN OF CONSTANTINOPLE. was too far away from the points where the emperor was most wanted — the banks of the Danube and the walls of Sirmium and Singidunum. For the ever- recurring wars with Persia it was even more incon- venient ; but these were less pressing dangers ; no Persian army had yet penetrated beyond Antioch — only 200 miles from the frontier — while in the Balkan Peninsula the Goths had broken so far into the heart of the empire as to sack Athens and Thessalonica. Constantine, with all the Roman world at his feet, and all its responsibilities weighing on his mind, was far too able a man to overlook the great need of the day — a more conveniently placed administrative and military centre for his empire. He required a place that should be easily accessible by land and sea — which Rome had never been in spite of its wonderful roads — that should overlook the Danube lands, with- out being too far away from the East ; that should be so strongly situated that it might prove an impreg- nable arsenal and citadel against barbarian attacks from the north ; that should at the same time be far enough away from the turmoil of the actual frontier to afford a safe and splendid residence for the imperial court. The names of several towns are given by historians as having suggested themselves to Con- stantine. First was his own birth-place — Naissus (Nisch) on the Morava, in the heart of the Balkan Peninsula ; but Naissus had little to recommend it : it was too close to the frontier and too far from the sea. Sardica — the modern Sofia in Bulgaria — was liable to the same objections, and had not the sole advantage of Naissus, that of being connected in constantine's choice. 17 sentiment with the emperor's early days. Nicomedia on its long gulf at the east end of the Propontis was a more eligible situation in every way, and had already served as an imperial residence. But all that could be urged in favour of Nicomedia applied with double force to Byzantium, and, in addition, Constantine had no wish to choose a city in which his own memory would be eclipsed by that of his predecessor Diocletian, and whose name was asso- ciated by the Christians, the class of his subjects whom he had most favoured of late, with the persecutions of Diocletian and Galerius. For Ilium, the last place on which Constantine had cast his mind, nothing could be alleged except its ancient legendary glories, and the fact that the mythologists of Rome had always fabled that their city drew its origin from the exiled Trojans of ALneas. Though close to the sea it had no good harbour, and it was just too far from the mouth of the Hellespont to command effectually the exit of the Euxine. Byzantium, on the other hand, was thoroughly well known to Constantine. For months his camp had been pitched beneath its walls ; he must have known accurately every inch of its environs, and none of its military advantages can have missed his eye. Nothing, then, could have been more natural than his selection of the old Megarian city for his new capital. Yet the Roman world was startled at the first news of his choice ; Byzantium had been so long known merely as a great port of call for the Euxine trade, and as a first-class provincial fortress, that it was hard to conceive of it as a destined seat of empire. l8 THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. When once Constantine had determined to make By/.antium his capital, in preference to any other place in the Balkan lands, his measures were taken with his usual energy and thoroughness. The limits of the new city were at once marked out by solemn processions in the old Roman style. In later ages a picturesque legend was told to account for the mag- nificent scale on which it was planned. The emperor, we read, marched out on foot, followed by all his court, and traced with his spear the line where the new fortifications were to be drawn. As he paced on further and further westward along the shore of the Golden Horn, till he was more than two miles away from his starting-point, the gate of old Byzan- tium, his attendants grew more and more surprised at the vastness of his scheme. At last they ventured to observe that he had already exceeded the most ample limits that an imperial city could require. But Con- stantine turned to rebuke them : " I shall go on," he said, " until He, the invisible guide who marches before me, thinks fit to stop." Guided by his myste- rious presentiment of greatness, the emperor advanced till he was three miles from the eastern angle oi Byzantium, and only turned his steps when he had included in his boundary line all the seven hills which are embraced in the peninsula between the Propontis and the Golden Horn. The rising ground just outside the walls of the old city, where Constantine's tent had been pitched during the siege of B.C. 323, was selected out as the market- place of the new foundation. There he erected the Milion, or " golden milestone," from which all the THE TOPOGRAPHY OF CONSTANTINOPLE. IQ distances of the eastern world were in future to be measured. This " central point of the world " was not a mere single stone, but a small building like a temple, its roof supported by seven pillars ; within was placed the statue of the emperor, together with that of his venerated mother, the Christian Empress Helena. The south-eastern part of the old town of Byzan- tium was chosen by Constantine for the site of his imperial palace. The spot was cleared of all private dwellings for a space of 150 acres, to give space not only for a magnificent residence for his whole court, but for spacious gardens and pleasure-grounds. A wall, commencing at the Lighthouse, where the Bosphorus joins the Propontis, turned inland and swept along parallel to the shore for about a mile, in order to shut off the imperial precinct from the city. North-west of the palace lay the central open space in which the life of Constantinople was to find its centre. This was the "Augustaeum," a splendid oblong forum, about a thousand feet long by three hundred broad. It was paved with marble and surrounded on all sides by stately public buildings. To its east, as we have already said, lay the imperial palace, but between the palace and the open space were three detached edi- fices connected by a colonnade. Of these, the most easterly was the Great Baths, known, from their builder, as the " Baths of Zeuxippus." They were built on the same magnificent scale which the earlier emperors had used in Old Rome, though they could not, perhaps, vie in size with the enormous Baths THE SENATE HOUSE. 21 of Caracalla. Constantine utilized and enlarged the old public bath of Byzantiinn, which had been re- built after the taking of the city by Severus. He adorned the frontage and courts of the edifice with statues taken from every prominent town of Greece and Asia, the old Hellenic masterpieces which had escaped the rapacious hands of twelve generations of plundering proconsuls and CcEsars. There were to be seen the Athene of Lyndus, the Amphithrite of Rhodes, the T'an which had been consecrated by the Greeks after the defeat of Xerxes, and the Zeus of Dodona. Adjoining the Baths, to the north, lay the second great building, on the east side of the Augustaeum — the Senate House. Constantine had determined to endow his new city with a senate modelled on that of Old Rome, and had indeed persuaded many old senatorial families to migrate eastward by judicious gifts of pensions and houses. We know that the assembly was worthily housed, but no details survive about Constantine's building, on account of its having been twice destroyed within the century. But, like the Baths of Zeuxippus, it was adorned with ancient statuary, among which the Nine Muses of Helicon are specially cited by the historian who describes the burning of the place in B.C. 404. Linked to the Senate House by a colonnade, lay on the north the Palace of the Patriarch, as the Bishop of Byzantium was ere long to be called, when raised to the same status as his brethren of Antioch and Alexandria. A fine building in itself, with a spacious hall of audience and a garden, the patriarchal dwelling 22 THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. was yet completely overshadowed by the imperial palace which rose behind it. And so it was with the patriarch himself : he lived too near his royal master to be able to gain any independent authority. Physically and morally alike he was too much over- looked by his august neighbour, and never found the least opportunity of setting up an independent spiritual authority over against the civil government, or of founding an imperiuni in iviperio like the Bishop of Rome, All along the western side of the Augustaeum, facing the three buildings whicli we have already described, lay an edifice which played a very pro- minent part in the public life of Constantinople. This was the great Hippodrome, a splendid circus 640 cubits long and 160 broad, in which were re- newed the games that Old Rome had known so well. The whole system of the chariot races between the teams that represented the " factions " of the Circus was reproduced at Byzantium with an energy that even surpassed the devotion of the Romans to horse racing. From the first foundation of the city the rivalry of the " Blues " and the " Greens " was one of the most striking features of the life of the place. It was carried far beyond the circus, and spread into all branches of life. We often hear of the " Green " faction identifying itself with Arianism, or of the " Blue " supporting a pretender to the throne. Not merely men of sporting interests, but persons of all ranks and professions, chose their colour and backed their faction. The system was a positive danger to the public peace, and constantly led to riots, culmi- 2-1 THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. nating- in the j^reat sedition of A.D. 523, which we shall presently have to describe at leni^th. In the Hippodrome the " Greens " always entered by the north-eastern gate, and sat on the east side ; the " Blues " approached by the north-western gate and stretched along the western side. The emperor's box, called the Kathisma, occupied the whole of the short northern side, and contained many hundreds of seats for the imperial retinue. The great central throne of the Kathisma was the place in which the monarch showed himself most frequently to his sub- jects, and around it many strange scenes were enacted. It was on this throne that the rebel Hypatius was crowned emperor by the mob, with his own wife's necklace for an impromptu diadem. Here also, two centuries later, the Emperor Justinian H. sat in state after his reconquest of Constantinople, with his rivals, Leontius and Apsimarus, bound beneath his foot- stool, while the populace chanted, in allusion to the names of the vanquished princes, the verse, " Thou shalt trample on the Lion and the Asp." Down the centre of the Hippodrome ran the " spina," or division wall, which every circus showed ; it was ornamented with three most curious monu- ments, whose strange juxtaposition seemed almost to typify the heterogeneous materials from which the new city was built up. The first and oldest was an obelisk brought from Egypt, and covered with the usual hieroglyphic inscriptions ; the second was the most notable, though one of the least beautiful, of the antiquities of Constantinople : it was the three- headed brazen serpent which Pausanias and the THE HIPPODROME. 25 victorious Greeks had dedicated at Delphi in 479 B.C., after they had destroyed the Persian army at Platasa. The golden tripod, which was supported by the heads of the serpents, had long been wanting : the sacrilegious Phocians had stolen it six centuries before ; but the dedicatory inscriptions engraved on the coils of the pedestal survived then and survive now to delight the arch3eologist. The third monu- ment on the " spina" was a square bronze column of more modern work, contrasting strangely with the venerable antiquity of its neighbours. By some freak of chance all three monuments have remained till our own day : the vast walls of the Hippodrome have crumbled away, but its central decorations still stand erect in the midst of an open space which the Turks call the Atmeidan, or place of horses, in dim memory of its ancient use. Along the outer eastern wall of the Hippodrome on the western edge of the Augustaeum, stood a range of small chapels and statues, the most im- portant landmark among them being the JSIilion or central milestone of the empire, which we have already described. The statues, few at first, were increased by later emperors, till they extended along the whole length of the forum. Constantine's own contribution to the collection was a tall porphyry column surmounted by a bronze image which had once been the tutelary Apollo of the city of Hiera- polis, but was turned into a representation of the emperor by the easy method of knocking off its head and substituting the imperial features. It was exactly the reverse of a change which can be seen at BUILDINO A PALACE. (From a Byzantine MS.) ST. SOPHIA. 27 Rome, where the popes have removed the head of the Emperor Aurelius, and turned him into St. Peter, on the column in the Corso. North of the Hippodrome stood the great church which Constantine erected for his Christian subjects, and dedicated to the Divine Wisdom {Hagia Sophia). It was not the famous domed edifice which now bears that name, but an earHer and humbler building, probably of the Basilica-shape then usual. Burnt down once in the fifth and once in the sixth centuries, it has left no trace of its original character. From the west door of St. Sophia a wooden gallery, supported on arches, crossed the square, and finally ended at the " Royal Gate " of the palace. By this the emperor would betake himself to divine service without having to cross the street of the Chalcoprateia (brass market), which lay opposite to St. Sophia. The general effect of the gallery must have been somewhat like that of the curious passage perched aloft on arches which connects the Pitti and Uffizzi palaces at Florence. The edifices which we have described formed the heart of Constantinople. Between the Palace, the Hippodrome, and the Cathedral most of the important events in the history of the city took place. But to north and west the city extended for miles, and every- where there were buildings of note, though no other cluster could vie with that round the Augustaeum. The Church of the Holy Apostles, which Constan- tine destined as the burying-place of his family, was the second among the ecclesiastical edifices of the town. Of the outlying civil buildings, the public 28 THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. granaries along the quays, the Golden Gate, by which the great road from the west entered the walls, and the palace of the praetorian praefect, who acted as governor of the city, must all have been well worthy of notice. A statue of Constantine on horseback, which stood by the last-named edifice, was one of the chief shows of Constantinople down to the end of the FIFTEENTH-CENTURY DRAWING OF THE EQUESTRIAN STATUE OF CONSTANTINE. Middle Ages, and some curious legends gathered around it. It was in A.D. 328 or 329 — the exact date is not easily to be fixed — that Constantine had definitely chosen Byzantium for his capital, and drawn out the plan for its development. As early as May 11, 330, the buildings were so far advanced that he was able to hold the festival which celebrated its consecration. DEDICATION FESTIVAL. 2g Christian bishops blessed the partially completed palace, and held the first service in St. Sophia ; for Constantine, though still unbaptized himself, had determined that the new city should be Christian from the first. Of paganism there was no trace in it, save a few of the old temples of the Byzantines, spared when the older streets were levelled to clear the ground for the palace and adjoining buildings. The statues of the gods which adorned the Baths and Senate House stood there as works of art, not as objects of worship. To fill the vast limits of his city, Constantine invited many senators of Old Rome and many rich provincial proprietors of Greece and Asia to take up their abode in it, granting them places in his new senate and sites for the dwellings they would require. The countless officers and functionaries of the im- perial court, with their subordinates and slaves, must have composed a very considerable element in the new population. The artizans and handicraftsmen were enticed in thousands by the offer of special privileges. Merchants and seamen had always abounded at Byzantium, and now flocked in num- bers which made the old commercial prosperity of the city seem insignificant. Most effective — though most demoralizing — of the gifts which Constantine bestowed on the new capital to attract immigrants was the old Roman privilege of free distribution of corn to the populace. The wheat-tribute of Egypt, which had previously formed part of the public provision of Rome, was transferred to the use of Constantinople, only the African corn from Carthage 30 THE FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE. being for the future assigned for the subsistence of the older city. On the completion of the dedication festival in 330 A.D. an imperial edict gave the city the title of New Rome, and the record was placed on a marble tablet near the equestrian statue of the emperor, opposite the Strategion. But " New Rome " was a phrase destined to subsist in poetry and rhetoric alone : the world from the first very rightly gave the city the founder's name only, and persisted in calling it Con- stantinople. III. THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. CONSTANTINE lived seven years after he had com- pleted the dedication of his new city, and died in peace and prosperity on the 22nd of May, A.D. 337, received on his death-bed into that Christian Church on whose verge he had lingered during the last half of his life. By his will he left his realm to be divided among his sons and nephews ; but a rapid succession of murders and civil wars thinned out the imperial house, and ended in the concentration of the whole empire from the Forth to the Tigris under the sceptre of Constantius II., the second son of the great emperor. The Roman world was not yet quite ripe for a perma- nent division ; it was still possible to manage it from a single centre, for by some strange chance the barbarian invasions which had troubled the third century had ceased for a time, and the Romans were untroubled, save by some minor bickerings on the Rhine and the Euphrates. Constantius II., an administrator of some ability, but gloomy, suspicious, and unsympathetic, was able to devote his leisure to ecclesiastical contro- versies, and to dishonour himself by starting the first 32 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. persecution of Christian by Christian that the world had seen. The crisis in the history of the empire was not destined to fall in his day, nor in the short reign of his cousin and successor, Julian, the amiable and cultured, but entirely wrongheaded, pagan zealot, who strove to put back the clock of time and restore the worship of the ancient gods of Greece. Both Constantius and Julian, if asked whence danger to the empire might be expected, would have pointed east- ward, to the Mesopotamian frontier, where their great enemy. Sapor King of Persia, strove, with no very great success, to break through the line of Roman fortresses that protected Syria and Asia Minor. But it was not in the east that the impending storm was really brewing. It was from the north that mis- chief was to come. For a hundred and fifty years the Romans had been well acquainted with the tribes of the Goths, the most easterly of the Teutonic nations who lay along the imperial border. All through the third century they had been molesting the provinces of the Balkan Peninsula by their incessant raids, as we have already had occasion to relate. Only after a hard struggle had they been rolled back across the Danube, and compelled to limit their settlements to its northern bank, in what had once been the land of the Dacians. The last struggle with them had been in the time of Constantine, who, in a war that lasted from A.D. 328 to A.D. 332, had beaten them in the open field, com- pelled their king to give his sons as hostages, and dictated his own terms of peace. Since then the appetite of the Goths for war and adventure seemed 34 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. permanently checked : for forty years they had kept comparatively quiet and seldom indulged in raids across the Danube. They were rapidly settling down into steady farmers in the fertile lands on the Theiss and the Pruth ; they traded freely with the Roman towns of Moesia ; many of their young warriors enlisted among the Roman auxiliary troops, and one consider- able body of Gothic emigrants had been permitted to settle as subjects of the empire on the northern slope of the Balkans. By this time many of the Goths were becoming Christians : priests of their own blood already ministered to them, and the Bible, translated into their own language, was already in their hands. One of the earliest Gothic converts, the good Bishop Ulfilas — the first bishop of German blood that was ever consecrated — had rendered into their idiom the New Testament and most of the Old. A great portion of his work still survives, incomparably the most precious relic of the old Teutonic tongues that we now possess. The Goths were rapidly losing their ancient ferocity. Compared to the barbarians who dwelt beyond them, they might almost be called a civilized race. The Romans were beginning to look upon them as a guard set on the frontier to ward off the wilder peoples that lay to their north and east. The nation was now divided into two tribes : the Visigoths, whose tribal name was the Thervings, lay more to the south, in what arc now the countries of Moldavia, Wallachia, and Southern Hungary ; the Ostrogoths, or tribe of the Gruthungs, lay more to the north and east, in Bessarabia, Transylvania, and the Dniester valley. THE HUNS. 35 But a totally unexpected series of events were now to show how prescient Constantine had been, in rear- ing his great fortress-capital to serve as the central place of arms of the Balkan Peninsula. About the year A.D. 372 the Huns, an enormous Tartar horde from beyond the Don and Volga, burst into the lands north of the Euxine, and began to work their way westward. The first tribe that lay in their way, the nomadic race of the Alans, they almost exterminated. Then they fell upon the Goths. The Ostrogoths made a desperate attempt to defend the line of the Dniester against the oncoming savages — " men with faces that can hardly be called faces — rather shapeless black collops of flesh with little points instead of eyes ; little in stature, but lithe and active, skilful in riding, broad shouldered, good at the bow, stiff-necked and proud, hiding under a barely human form the ferocity of the wild beast." But the enemy whom the Gothic historian describes in these unin- viting terms was too strong for the Teutons of the East. The Ostrogoths were crushed and compelled to become vassals of the Huns, save a remnant who fought their way southward to the Wallachian shore, near the marshes of the Delta of the Danube. Then the Huns fell on the Visigoths. The wave of invasion pressed on ; the Bug and the Pruth proved no barrier to the swarms of nomad bowmen, and the Visigoths, under their Duke Fritigern, fell back in dismay with their wives and children, their waggons and flocks and herds, till they found themselves with their backs to the Danube. Surrender to the enemy was more dreadful to the Visigoths than to their eastern 2,6 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. brethren ; they were more civih'zed, most of them were Christians, and the prospect of slavery to savages seems to have appeared intolerable to them. Pressed against the Danube and the Roman border, the Visigoths sent in despair to ask permission to cross from the Emperor. A contemporary writer describes how they stood. " All the multitude that had escaped from the murderous savagery of the Huns — no less than 200,000 fighting men, besides women and old men and children — were there on the river bank, stretching out their hands with loud lamentations, and earnestly supplicating leave to cross, bewailing their calamity, and promising that they would ever faithfully adhere to the imperial alliance if only the boon was granted them." At this moment (A.D. 376) the Roman Empire was again divided. The house of Constantine was gone, and the East was ruled by Valens, a stupid, cowardly, and avaricious prince, who had obtained the diadem and half the Roman world only because he was the brother of Valentinian, the greatest general of the day. Valentinian had taken the West for his portion, and dwelt in his camp on the Rhine and Upper Danube, while Valens, slothful and timid, shut him- self up with a court of slaves and flatterers in the imperial palace at Constantinople. The proposal of the Goths filled Valens with dismay. It was difficult to say which was more dangerous — to refuse a passage to 200,000 desperate men with arms in their hands and a savage foe at their backs, or to admit them within the line of river and fortress that protected the border, with an implied VALENS AND THE GOTHS. 37 obligation to find land for them. After much doubt- ing he chose the latter alternative : if the Goths would give hostages and surrender their arms, they should be ferried across the Danube and permitted to settle as subject-allies within the empire. The Goths accepted the terms, gave up the sons of their chiefs as hostages, and streamed across the river as fast as the Roman Danube-flotilla could transport them. But no sooner had they reached Moesia than troubles broke out. The Roman officials at first tried to disarm the immigrants, but the Goths were un- willing to surrender their weapons, and offered large bribes to be allowed to retain them ; in strict dis- obedience to the Emperor's orders, the bribes were accepted and the Goths retained their arms. Further disputes soon broke out. The provisions of Moesia did not suffice for so many hundred thousand mouths as had just entered its border, and Valens had ordered stores of corn from Asia to be collected for the use of the Goths, till they should have received and commenced to cultivate land of their own. But the governor, Lupicinus, to fill his own pockets, held back the food, and doled out what he chose to give at exorbitant prices. In sheer hunger the Goths were driven to barter a slave for a single loaf of bread and ten pounds of silver for a sheep. This shameless extortion continued as long as the stores and the patience of the Goths lasted. At last the poorer immigrants were actually beginning to sell their own children for slaves rather than let them starve. This drove the Goths to desperation, and a chance affray set the whole nation in a blaze. Fritigern, with many 38 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. of his nobles, was dining with Count Lupicinus at the town of MarcianopoHs, when some starving Goths tried to pillage the market by force. A party of Roman soldiers strove to drive them off, and were at once mishandled or slain. On hearing the tumult and learning its cause, Lupicinus recklessly bade his retinue seize and slay Fritigern and the other guests at his banquet. The Goths drew their swords and cut their way out of the palace. Then riding to the nearest camp of his followers, Fritigern told his tale, and bade them take up arms against Rome. There followed a year of desperate fighting all along the Danube, and the northern slope of the Balkans. The Goths half-starved for many months, and smarting under the extortion and chicanery to which they had been subjected, soon showed that the old barbarian spirit was but thinly covered by the veneer of Christianity and civilization which they had ac- quired in the last half-century. The struggle resolved itself into a repetition of the great raids of the third century : towns were sacked and the open country harried in the old style, nor was the war rendered less fierce by the fact that many runaway slaves and other outcasts among the provincial population joined the invaders. But the Roman armies still retained their old reputation ; the ravages of the Goths were checked at the Balkans, and though joined by the remnants of the Ostrogoths from the Danube mouth, as well as by other tribes flying from the Huns, the Visigoths were at first held at bay by the imperial armies. A desperate pitched battle at Ad Salices, near the modern Kustendje thinned the ranks of both sides, but led to no decisive result. OUTBREAK OF WAR. 39 Next year, however, the unwarlike Emperor, driven into the field by the clamours of his subjects, took the field in person, with great reinforcements brought from Asia Minor. At the same time his nephew Gratian, a gallant young prince who had suc- ceeded to the Empire of the West, set forth through Pannonia to bring aid to the lands of the Lower Danube. The personal intervention of Valens in the struggle was followed by a fearful disaster. In 378 B.C., the main body of the Goths succeeded in forcing the line of the Balkans ; they were not far from Adrianople when the Emperor started to attack them, with a splendid army of 60,000 men. Every one expected to hear of a victory, for the reputation of invincibility still clung to the legions, and after six hundred years of war the disciplined infantry of Rome, robur pcdittim^ whose day had lasted since the Punic wars, were still reckoned superior, when fairly handled, to any amount of wild barbarians. But a new chapter of the history of the art of war was just commencing ; during their sojourn in the plains of South Russia and Roumania the Goths had taken, first of all German races, to fighting on horse- back. Dwelling in the Ukraine they had felt the influence of that land, ever the nurse of cavalry from the day of the Scythian to that of the Tartar and Cossack. They had come to " consider it more honourable to fight on horse than on foot," and every chief was followed by his war-band of mounted men. Driven against their will into conflict with the empire, they found themselves face to face into the army that 40 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. had SO long held the world in fear, and had turned back their own ancestors in rout three generations before. Valens found the main body of the Goths encamped in a great " laager," on the plain north of Adrianople. After some abortive negotiations he developed an attack on their front, when suddenly a great body of horsemen charged in on the Roman flank. It was the main strength of the Gothic cavalry, which had been foraging at a distance ; receiving news of the fight it had ridden straight for the battle field. Some Roman squadrons which covered the left flank of the Emperor's army were ridden down and trampled under foot. Then the Goths swept down on the infantry of the left wing, rolled it up, and drove it in upon the centre. So tremendous was their impact that legions and cohorts were pushed together in hopeless confusion. Every attempt to stand firm failed, and in a few minutes left, centre, and reserve, were one undistinguishable mass. Imperial guards, light troops, lancers, auxiliaries, and infantry of the line were wedged together in a press that grew closer every moment. The Roman cavalry saw that the day was lost, and rode off without another effort. Then the abandoned infantry realized the horror of their position : equally unable to deploy or to fly, they had to stand to be cut down. Men could not raise their arms to strike a blow, so closely were they packed ; spears snapped right and left, their bearers being unable to lift them to a vertical position ; many soldiers were stifled in the press. Into this quivering mass the Goths rode, plying lance and sword against THE BATTLE OF ADRIA^OFLE. 41 the helpless enemy. It was not till forty thousand men had fallen that the thinning of the ranks enabled the survivors to break out and follow their cavalry in a headlong flight. They left behind them, dead on the field, the Emperor, the Grand Masters of the Infantry and Cavalry, the Count of the Palace, and thirty-five commanders of different corps. The battle of Adrianople was the most fearful defeat suffered by a Roman army since Cann^, a slaughter to which it is aptly compared by the con- temporary historian Ammianus Marcellinus, The army of the East was almost annihilated, and was never reorganized again on the old Roman lines. This awful catastrophe brought down on Constanti- nople the first attack which it experienced since it had changed its name from Byzantium. After a vain assault on Adrianople, the victorious Goths pressed rapidly on towards the imperial city. Harrying the whole country side as they passed by, they presented themselves before the " Golden Gate," its south- western exit. But the attack was destined to come to nothing : " their courage failed them when they looked on the vast circuit of walls and the enormous extent of streets ; all that mass of riches within appeared inaccessible to them. They cast away the siege machines which they had prepared, and rolled backward on to Thrace." ^ Beyond skirmishing under the walls with a body of Saracen cavalry which had been brought up to strengthen the garrison, they made no hostile attempt on the city. So forty years after his death, Constantine's prescience was for the ' Ammianus IMarcellinus. 42 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. first time justified. He was right in believing that an impregnable city on the Bosphorus would prove the salvation of the Balkan Peninsula even if all its open country were overrun by the invader. The unlucky Valens was succeeded on the throne by Theodosius, a wise and virtuous prince, who set himself to repair, by caution and courage combined, the disaster that had shaken the Roman power in the Danube lands. With the remnants of the army of the East he made head against the barbarians ; with- out venturing to attack their main body, he destroyed many marauders and scattered bands, and made the continuance of the war profitless to them. If they dispersed to plunder they were cut off ; if they held together in masses they starved Presently Fritigern died, and Theodosius made peace with his successor Athanarich, a king who had lately come over the Danube at the head of a new swarm of Goths from the Carpathian country. Theodosius frankly promised and faithfully observed the terms that Fritigern had asked of Valens ten years before. He granted the Goths land for their settlement in the Thracian province which they had wasted, and enlisted in his armies all the chiefs and their war-bands. Within ten years after the fight of Adrianople he had forty thousand Teutonic horsemen in his service ; they formed the best and most formidable part of his host, and were granted a higher pay than the native Roman soldiery. The immediate military results of the policy of Theodosius were not unsatisfactory ; it was his Gothic auxiliaries who won for him his two great victories over the legions of the West, when in > S^ •7- S^ O •« 44 THE FIGHT WITH THE GOTHS. A.D. 388 he conquered the rebel Magnus Maximus, and in A.D. 394 the rebel Eugenius. But from the poHtical side the experiment of Theodosius was fraught with the greatest danger that the Roman Empire had yet known. When barbarian auxiliaries had been enlisted before, they had been placed under Roman leaders and mixed with equal numbers of Roman troops. To leave them under their own chiefs, and deliberately favour them at the expense of the native soldiery, was a most unhappy experiment. It practically put the command of the empire in their hands ; for there was no hold over them save their personal loyalty to Theodosius, and the spell which the grandeur of the Roman name and Roman culture still exercised over their minds. That spell was still strong, as is shown in the story which the Gothic historian Jornandes tells about the visit of the old King Athanarich to Constantinople. " When he entered the royal city, ' Now,' said he, 'do I at last behold what I had often heard and deemed incredible.' He passed his eyes hither and thither admiring first the site of the city, then the fleets of corn-ships, then the lofty walls, then the crowds of people of all nations, mingled as the waters from divers springs mix in a single pool, then the ranks of disciplined soldiery. And at last he cried aloud, ' Doubtless the Emperor is as a god on earth, and he who raises a hand against him is guilty of his own blood.' " But this impression was not to con- tinue for long. In A.D. 395, the good Emperor Theodosius, " the lover of peace and of the Goths," as he was called, died, and left the throne to his two weakly sons Arcadius and Honoriug, IV. THE DEPARTURE OF THE GERMANS. The Roman Empire, at the end of the fourth century, was in a condition which made the experi- ment of Theodosius particularly dangerous. The government was highly centralized and bureaucratic ; hosts of officials, appointed directly from Constanti- nople, administered every provincial post from the greatest to the least. There was little local self- government and no local patriotism. The civil population was looked on by the bureaucratic caste as a multitude without rights or capacities, existing solely for the purpose of paying taxes. So strongly was this view held, that to prevent the revenue from suffering, the land-holding classes, from the cnrialis, or local magnate, down to the poorest peasant, were actually forbidden to move from one district to another without special permission. A landowner was even prohibited from enlisting in the army, unless he could show that he left an heir behind him capable of paying his share in the local rates. An almost entire separation existed between the civil population and the military caste ; it was hard for a civilian of any position to enlist ; only the lower classes — who 46 THE DEPARTURE OF THE GERMANS. were of no account in tax-paying — were suffered to join the army. On the other hand, every pressure was used to make the sons of soldiers continue in the service. Thus had arisen a purely professional army, which had no sympathy or connection with the unarmed provincials whom it protected. The army had been a source of unending trouble in the third century ; for a hundred years it had made and unmade Caesars at its pleasure. That was while it was still mainly composed of men born within the empire, and officered by Romans. But Theodosius had now swamped the native element in the army by his wholesale enlistment of Gothic war-bands. And he had, moreover, handed many of the chief military posts to Teutons. Some of them indeed had married Roman wives and taken kindly to Roman modes of life, while nearly all had professed Christianity. But at the best they were military adventurers of alien blood, while at the worst they were liable to relapse into barbarism, cast all their loyalty and civilization to the winds, and take to harrying the empire again in the old fearless fashion of the third century. Clearly nothing could be more dangerous than to hand over the protection of the timid and unarmed civil population to such guardians. The contempt they must have felt for the unwarlike provincials was so great, and the tempta- tion to plunder the wealthy cities of the empire so constant and pressing, that it is no wonder if the Teutons yielded. Cccsar-making seemed as easy to the leaders as the sack of provincial churches and treasuries did to the rank and file. STILICHO. 47 When the personal ascendency of Theodosius was removed, the empire fell at once into the troubles which were inevitable. Both at the court of Arcadius, who reigned at Constantinople, and at that of Honorius, who had received the West as his share, a war of factions commenced between the German and the Roman party. Theodosius had distributed so many high military posts to Goths and other Teutons, that this influence was almost unbounded. Stilicho Magistcr militum (commander-in-chief) of the armies of Italy was predominant at the council board of Honorius ; though he was a pure barbarian by blood, Theodosius had married him to his own niece Serena, and left him practically supreme in the West, for the young emperor was aged only eleven. In the East Arcadius, the elder brother, had attained his eighteenth year, and might have ruled his own realm had he possessed the energy. But he was a witless young man, " short, thin, and sallow, so inactive that he seldom spoke, and always looked as if he was about to fall asleep." His prime minister was a Western Roman named Rufinus, but before the first year of his reign was over, a Gothic captain named Gainas slew Rufinus at a review, before the Emperor's very eyes. The weak Arcadius was then compelled to make the eunuch Eutropius his minister, and to appoint Gainas Magister militum for the East. Gainas and Stilicho contented themselves with wire-pulling at Court ; but another Teutonic leader thought that the time had come for bolder work. Alaric was a chief sprung from the family of the Baits, whom the Goths reckoned next to the god- 48 THE DEPARTURE OF THE GERMANS. descended Amals among their princely houses. He was young, daring, and untameable ; several years spent at Constantinople had failed to civilize him, but had succeeded in filling him with contempt for Roman effeminacy. Soon after the death of Theo- dosius, he raised the Visigoths in revolt, making it his pretext that the advisers of Arcadius were refusing the/oederati, or auxiliaries, certain arrears of pay. The Teutonic sojourners in Moesiaand Thrace joined him almost to a man, and the Constantinopolitan govern- ment found itself with only a shadow of an army to oppose the rebels. Alaric wandered far and wide, from the Danube to the gates of Constantinople, and from Constantinople to Greece, ransoming or sacking every town in his way till the Goths were gorged with plunder. No one withstood him save Stilicho, who was summoned from the West to aid his master's brother. By skilful manoeuvres Stilicho blockaded Alaric in a mountain position in Arcadia ; but when he had him at his mercy, it was found that " dog does not eat dog." The Teutonic prime minister let the Teutonic rebel escape him, and the Visigoths rolled north again into Illyricum. Sated with plunder, Alaric then con- sented to grant Arcadius peace, on condition that he was made a Magisterviilitiim like Stilicho and Gainas, and granted as much land for his tribesmen as he chose to ask. [a.D. 396.] For the next five years Alaric, now proclaimed King of the Goths by his victorious soldiery, reigned with undisputed sway over the eastern parts of the Balkan Peninsula, paying only a shadow of homage to the royal phantom at Constantinople. There ALARIC THE GOTH. 49 appeared every reason to believe that a German kingdom was about to be permanently established in the lands south and west of the Danube. The fate which actually befell Gaul, Spain, and Britain, a few years later seemed destined for Moesia and Macedonia. How different the history of Europe would have been if the Germans had settled down in Servia and Bulgaria we need hardly point out. But another series of events was impending. In A.D. 401, Alaric, instead of resuming his attacks on Constantinople, suddenly declared war on the Western Emperor Honorius. He marched round the head of the Adriatic and invaded Northern Italy. The half-Romanized Stilicho, who wished to keep the rule of the West to himself, fought hard to turn the Goths out of Italy, and beat back Alaric's first invasion. But then the young emperor, who was as weak and more worthless than his brother Arcadius, slew the great minister on a charge of treason. When Stilicho was gone, Alaric had everything his own way ; he moved with the whole Visigothic race into Italy, where he ranged about at his will, ransoming and plundering every town from Rome downwards. The Visigoths are heard of no more in the Balkan Peninsula ; they now pass into the history of Italy and then into that of Spain. While Alaric's eyes were turned on Italy, but before he had actually come into conflict with Sti- licho, the Court of Constantinople had been the seat of grave troubles. Gainas the Gothic Magister militnm of the East, and his creature, the eunuch Eutropius, had fallen out, and the man of war had no 50 THE DEPARTURE OF THE GERMANS. difficulty in disposing of the wretched harem-bred Grand Chamberlain. Instigated by Gainas, the Ger- man mercenaries in the army of Asia started an insurrection under a certain Tribigild. Gainas was told to march against them, and collected troops ostensibly for that purpose. But when he was at the head of a considerable army, he did not attack the rebels, but sent a message to Constantinople bidding Arcadius give up to him the obnoxious Grand Chamberlain. Eutropius, hearing of his danger, threw himself on the protection of the Church : he fled into the Cathedral of St. Sophia and clung to the altar. John Chrysostom, the intrepid Patriarch of Constan- tinople, forbade the soldiers to enter the church, and protected the fugitive for some days. One of the most striking incidents in the history of St. Sophia followed : while the cowering Chamberlain lay before the altar, John preached to a crowded congregation a sermon on the text, " Vanity of vanities, all is vanity," emphasizing every period of his harangue by pointing to the fallen Eutropius — prime minister of the empire yesterday, and a hunted criminal to-day. The patriarch extorted a promise that the eunuch's life should be spared, and Eutropius gave himself up. Arcadius banished him to Cyprus, but the inexorable Gainas was not contented with his rival's removal ; he had Eutropius brought back to Constantinople and beheaded. The Magister milituni now brought his army over to Constantinople, and quartered it there to overawe the emperor. It appeared quite likely that ere long the Germans would sack the city ; but the fate that GAINAS SLAIN. 51 befell Rome ten years later was not destined for Con- stantinople. A mere chance brawl put the domina- tion of Gainas to a sudden end. He himself and many of his troops were outside the city, when a sudden quarrel at one of the gates between a band of Goths and some riotous citizens brought about a general outbreak against the Germans. The Con- stantinopolitan mob showed itself more courageous and not less unruly than the Roman mob of elder days. The whole population turned out with extem- porized arms and attacked the German soldiery. The gates were closed to prevent Gainas and his troops from outside returning, and a desperate street- fight ranged over the entire city. Isolated bodies of the Germans were cut off one by one, and at last their barracks were surrounded and set on fire. The rioters had the upper hand ; seven thousand soldiers fell, and the remnant thought themselves lucky to escape. Gainas at once declared open war on the empire, but he had not the genius of Alaric, nor the numerical strength that had followed the younger chief He was beaten in the field and forced to fly across the Danube, where he was caught and beheaded by Uldes, King of the Huns. Curiously enough the officer who defeated Gainas was himself not only a Goth but a heathen : he was named Fravitta and had been the sworn guest-friend of Theodosius, whose son he faithfully defended even against the assault of his own countrymen, [a.d. 401.] The departure of Alaric and the death of Gainas freed the Eastern Romans from the double danger that has impended over them. They were neither 52 THE DEPARTURE OF THE GERMANS. to see an independent German kingdom on the Danube and Morava, nor to remain under the rule of a semi-civilized German Magister milituni, making and unmaking ministers, and perhaps Caesars, at his good pleasure. The weak Arcadius was enabled to spend the remaining seven years of his life in comparative peace and quiet. His court was only troubled by an open war between his spouse, the Empress ^lia Eudoxia, and John Chrysostom, the Patriarch of Constantinople. John was a man of saintly life and apostolic fervour, but rash and inconsiderate alike in speech and action. His charity and eloquence made him the idol of the populace of the imperial city, but his austere manners and autocratic methods of dealing with his subordinates had made him many foes among the clergy. The patriarch's enemies were secretly supported by the empress, who had taken offence at the outspoken way in which John habitually denounced the luxury and insolence of her court. She favoured the intrigues of Theophilus, Patriarch of Alexandria, against his brother prelate, backed the Asiatic clergy in their complaints about John's oppression of them, and at last induced the Emperor to allow the saintly patriarch to be deposed by a hastily-summoned council, the " Synod of the Oak " held outside the city. The populace rose at once to defend their pastor ; riots broke out, Theodosius was chased back to Egypt, and the Emperor, terrified by an earthquake which seemed to manifest the wrath of heaven, restored John to his place. Next year, however, the war between the empress and the patriarch broke out again. John took the EXILE OF CHRYSOSTOM. 53 occasion of the erection of a statue of Eudoxia in the Augustaeum to recommence his polemics. Some obsolete semi-pagan ceremonies at its dedication roused his wrath, and he delivered a scathing sermon in which — if his enemies are to be believed — he com- pared the empress to Herodias, and himself to John the Baptist. The Emperor, at his wife's demand, summoned another council, which condemned Chrysostom, and on Easter Day, A.D. 404, seized the patriarch in his cathedral by armed force, and banished him to Asia. That night a fire, probably kindled by the angry adherents of Chrysostom, broke out in St. Sophia, which was burnt to the ground. From thence it spread to the neighbouring buildings, and finally to the Senate-house, which was consumed with all the treasures of ancient Greek art of which Constantine had made it the repository. Meanwhile the exiled John was banished to a dreary mountain fastness in Cappadocia, and after- wards condemned to a still more remote prison at Pityus on the Euxine. He died on his way thither, leaving a wonderful reputation for patience and cheer- fulness under affliction. This fifth-century Becket was well-nigh the only patriarch of Constantinople who ever fell out with the imperial Court on a question of morals as distinguished from dogma. Chrysostom's quarrel was with the luxury, insolence, and frivolity of the Empress and her Court ; no real ecelesiastical question was involved in his deposition, for the charges against him were mere pretexts to cover the hatred of his disloyal clergy and the revenge of the insulted Aelia Eudoxia. [a.d. 407.] ^p i ^ ^^P P 1 ^^ ^s^^m ^^^ i "7^ a^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^ iM^^^^ ^M '^3kffl i 1 1 1 ^CT wl^s i ^ 1^ ^^^n V. THE REORGANIZATION OF THE EASTERN EMPIRE. (A.D. 408-518.) The feeble and inert xArcadius died in A.D. 408, at the early age of thirty-one ; his imperious consort had preceded him to the grave, and the empire of the East was left to Theodosius II., a child of seven years, their only son. There was hardly an instance in Roman history of a minor succeeding quietly to his father's throne. An ambitious relative or a disloyal general had habitually supplanted the helpless heir. But the ministers of Arcadius were exceptionally virtuous or exceptionally destitute of ambition. The little emperor was duly crowned, and the administra- tion of the East undertaken in his name by the able Anthemius, who held the office of Praetorian Praefect. History relates nothing but good of this minister ; he made a wise commercial treaty with the king of Persia ; he repelled with ease a Hunnish invasion of Moesia ; he built a flotilla on the Danube, where Roman war- ships had not been seen since the death of Valens, forty years before ; he reorganized the corn supply YOUTH OF THEODOSIUS II. 55 of Constantinople ; and did much to get back into order and cultivation the desolated north-western lands of the Balkan Peninsula, from which Alaric and his Visigotliic hordes had now taken their final departure. The empire was still more indebted to him for bringing up the young Theodosius as an honest and god-fearing man. The palace under Anthemius' rule was the school of the virtues : the lives of the emperor and his three sisters, Pulcheria, Arcadia, and Marina, were the model and the marvel of their subjects. Theodosius inherited the piety and honesty of his grandfather and namesake, but was a youth of slender capacity, though he took some interest in literature, and was renowned for his beautiful penmanship. His eldest sister, Pulcheria, was the ruling spirit of the family, and possessed unlimited influence over him, though she was but two years his senior. When Anthemius died in A.D. 414, she took the title of Augusta, and assumed the regency of the East. Pulcheria was an extraordinary woman : on gathering up the reins of power she took a vow of chastity, and lived as a crowned nun for thirty-six years ; her fear had been that, if she married, her husband might cherish ambitious schemes against her brother's crown ; she therefore kept single herself and persuaded her sisters to make a similar vow. Austere, indefatigable, and unselfish, she proved equal to ruling the realms of the East with success, though no woman had ever made the attempt before. When Theodosius came of age he refused to re- move his sister from power, and treated her as his colleague and equal. By her advice he married in A.D. 56 REORGANIZATION OF THE EASTERN EM FIRE. 421, the year that he came of age, the beautiful and accomphshed Athenais, daughter of the philosopher Leontius. The emperor's chosen spouse had been brought up as a pagan, but was converted before her marriage, and baptized by the name of Eudocia. She displayed her literary tastes in writing religious poetry, which had some merit, according to the critics of the succeeding age. The austere Pulcheria — always immersed in state business or occupied in religious observances — found herself ere long ill at ease in the company of the lively, beautiful, and volatile literary lady whom she had chosen as sister-in-law. If Theodosius had been less easy-going and good- hearted he must have sent away either his sister or his wife, but he long contrived to dwell affec- tionately with both, though their bickerings were un- ending. After many years of married life, however, a final quarrel came, and the empress retired to spend the last years of her life in seclusion at Jerusalem. The cause of her exile is not really known : we have only a wild story concerning it, which finds an exact parallel in one of the tales of the " Arabian Nights." "The emperor," so runs the tale, "was one day met by a peasant who presented him with a Phrygian apple of enormous size, so that the whole Court marvelled at it. And he gave the man a hundred and fifty gold pieces in reward, and sent the apple to the Empress Eudocia. But she sent it as a present to Paulinus, the ' Master of the Offices,' because he was a friend of the emperor. But Paulinus, not knowing the history of the apple, took it and gave it to the emperor as he reentered the Palace. And Theodosius having received it, recognized it and concealed it, and called his wife and questioned her, saying, 'Where is the apple that I sent you? ' She answered, ' I have eaten it.' Then he bade her swear by his salvation the truth, whether she had eaten it or sent it to some one. And Eudocia swore that she had EXILE OF EUDOCIA. 57 sent it to no man, but had herself eaten it. Then the emperor showed her the apple, and was exceedingly wrath, suspecting that she was enamoured of Paulinus, and had sent it to him as a love-gift ; for he was a very handsome man. And on this account he put Paulinus to death, but he permitted Eudocia to go to the Holy Places to pray. And she went down from Constantinople to Jerusalem, and dwelt there all her days." That Paulinus was executed, and that Eudocia spent her last years of retirement in Palestine, we know for certain. All the rest of the story is in reality hidden from us. The chief improbability of the tale is that Eudocia had reached the age of forty when the breach between her and her husband took place, and that Paulinus was also an official of mature years. Theodosius' long reign passed by in comparative quiet. Its only serious troubles were a short war with the Persians, and a longer one with Attila, the great king of the Huns, whose empire now stretched over all the lands north of the Black Sea and Danube, where the Goths had once dwelt. In this struggle the Roman armies were almost invariably unfortunate. The Huns ravaged the country as far as Adrianople and Philippopolis, and had to be bought off by the annual payment of 700 lbs. of gold [i^3 1,000]. It is true that they fell on Theodosius while his main force was engaged on the Persian frontier, but the constant ill-success of the imperial generals seems to show that the armies of the East had never been properly re- organized since the military system of Theodosius I. had been broken up by the revolt of Gainas forty years before. His grandson had neither a trustworthy body of German auxiliaries nor a sufficiently large ANGEL OF VICTORY. (From a Fifth-cenitay Diptych.) REIGN OF MARCIANUS. 59 native levy of born subjects of the empire to protect his borders. The reconstruction of the Roman military forces was reserved for the successors of Theodosius 1 1. He himself was killed by a fall from his horse in 450 A.D., leaving an only daughter, who was married to her cousin Valentinian III., Emperor of the West. Theodosius, with great wisdom, had designated as his successor, not his young son-in-law, a cruel and profligate prince, but his sister Pulcheria, who at the same time ended her vow of celibacy and married Marcianus, a veteran soldier and a prominent member of the Senate. The marriage was but formal, for both were now well advanced in years : as a political expedient it was all that could be desired. The empire had peace and prosperity under their rule, and freed itself from the ignominious tribute to the Huns. Before Attila died in 452, he had met and been checked by the succours which Marcianus sent to the distressed Romans of the West When Marcianus and Pulcheria passed away, the empire came into the hands of a series of three men of ability. They were all bred as high civil officials, not as generals ; all ascended the throne at a ripe age ; not one of them won his crown by arms, all were peaceably designated either by their predecessors, or by the Senate and army. These princes were Leo I. (457-474), Zeno (474-491), Anastasius (491-5 18). Their chief merit was that they guided the Roman Empire in the East safely through the stormy times which saw its extinction in the West. While, beyond the Adriatic, province after province was being lopped 6o REORGANIZATION OF THE EASTERN EMPIRE. off and formed into a new Germanic kingdom, the emperors who reigned at Constantinople kept a tight grip on the Balkan Peninsula and on Asia, and suc- ceeded in maintaining their realm absolutely intact. Both East and West were equally exposed to the barbarian in the fifth century, and the difference of their fate came from the character of their rulers, not from the diversity of their political conditions. In the West, after the extinction of the house of Theodosius (455 A.D.), the emperors were ephemeral puppets, made and unmade by the generals of their armies, who were invariably Germans. The two Magistri militum, Ricimer and Gundovald — one Suabian, the other Burgundian by birth — deposed or slew no less than five of their nominal masters in seventeen years. In the East, on the other hand, it was the emperors who destroyed one after another the ambitious generals, who, by arms or intrigue, threatened their throne. While this comparison bears witness to the personal ability of the three emperors who ruled at Constanti- nople between a.d. 457 and a.d. 518, it is only fair to remember they were greatly helped by the fact that the German element in their armies had never reached the pitch of power to which it had attained in the West ; the suppression of Gainas forty years before had saved them from that danger. But unruly and aspiring generals were not wanting in the East ; the greatest danger of Leo I, was the conspiracy of the great Magister militum Aspar, whom he detected and slew when he was on the eve of rebelling. Zeno was once chased out of his capital by rebels, and twice ZENO REORGANIZES THE ARMY. 6l vexed by dangerous risings in Asia Minor, but on each occasion he triumphed over his adversaries, and celebrated his victory by the execution of the leaders of the revolt. Anastasius was vexed for several years by the raids of a certain Count Vitalian, who ranged over the Thracian provinces with armies recruited from the barbarians beyond the Danube. But, in spite of all these rebellions, the empire was never in serious danger of sinking into disorder or breaking up, as the Western realm had done, into new un- Roman kingdoms. So far was it from this fate, that Anastasius left his successor, when he died in A.D. 518, a loyal army of 150,000 men, a treasure of 320,000 lbs. of gold, and an unbroken frontier to East and West. The main secret of the success of the emperors of the fifth century in holding their own came from the fact that they had reorganized their armies, and filled them up with native troops in great numbers. Leo I. was the first ruler who utilized the military virtues of the Isaurians, or mountain populations of Southern Asia Minor. He added several regiments of them to the army of the East, but it was his son-in-law and successor, Zeno, himself an Isaurian born, who developed the scheme. He raised an imperial guard from his countrymen, and enlisted as many corps of them as could be raised ; moreover, he formed regiments of Armenians and other inhabitants of the Roman frontier of the East, and handed over to his successor, Anastasius, an army in which the barbarian auxiliaries — now composed of Teutons and Huns in about equal numbers — were decidedly dominated by the native elements. 62 REORGANIZATION OF THE EASTERN EMPIRE. The last danger which the Eastern Empire was to experience from the hands of the Germans fell into the reign of Zeno. The Ostrogoths had submitted to the Huns ninety years before, when their brethren the Visigoths fled into Roman territory, in the reign of Valens. But when the Hunnish Empire broke up at the death of Attila [A.D. 452], the Ostro- goths freed themselves, and replaced their late masters as the main danger on the Danube. The bulk of them streamed south-westward, and settled in Pannonia, the border-province of the Western Empire, on the frontier of the East-Roman districts of Dacia and Moesia. They soon fell out with Zeno, and two Ostrogothic chiefs, Theodoric, the son of Theodemir, and Theodoric, the son of Triarius, were the scourges of the Balkan Peninsula for more than twenty years. While the bulk of their tribesmen settled down on the banks of the Save and Mid-Danube, the two Theo- dorics harried the whole of Macedonia and Moesia by never-ending raids. Zeno tried to turn them against each other, offering first to the one, then to the other, the title of Magister militiim, and a large pension. But now — as in the time of Alaric and Stilicho — it was seen that "dog will not eat dog"; the two rheodorics, after quarrelling for a while, banded tliemselves together against Zeno. The story of their reconciliation is curious. Theodoric, the son of Theodemir, the ally of Rome br the moment, had surrounded his rival on a rocky hill in a defile of the Balkans. While they lay opposite each other, Theodoric, the son of Triarius [he is usually known as Theodoric the One-Eyed], REBELLION OF THEODORIC. 63 rode down to his enemy's lines and called to him, " Madman, betrayer of your race, do you not see that the Roman plan is always to destroy Goths by Goths? Whichever of us fails, they, not we, will be the stronger. They never give you real help, but send you out against me to perish here in the Desert." Then all the Goths cried out, " The One-Eyed is right. These men are Goths like ourselves." So the two Theodorics made peace, and Zeno had to cope with them both at once [a.d. 479]. Two years later Theodoric the One-Eyed was slain by accident — his horse flung him, as he mounted, against a spear fixed by the door of his tent — but his namesake continued a thorn in the side of the empire till 488 A.D. In that year Zeno bethought him of a device for rid- ding himself of the Ostrogoth, who, though he made no permanent settlement in Moesia or Macedonia, was gradually depopulating the realm by his incur- sions. The line of ephemeral emperors who reigned in Italy over the shrunken Western realm had ended in 476, when the German general Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustulus, and did not trouble himself to nominate another puppet-Caesar to succeed him. By his order a deputation from the Roman Senate visited Zeno at Constantinople, to inform him that they did not require an emperor of their own to govern Italy, but would acknowledge him as ruler alike of East and West ; at the same time they be- sought Zeno to nominate, as his representative in the Italian lands, their defender, the great Odoacer. Zeno replied by advising the Romans to persuade Odoacer to recognize as his lord Julius Nepos, one of the 64 REORGANIZATION OF THE EASTERN EMPIRE. dethroned nominees of Ricimer, who had survived his loss of the imperial diadem. Odoacer refused, and proclaimed himself king in Italy, while still affecting — against Zeno's own will — to recognize the Con- stantinopolitan emperor as his suzerain. In 488 A.D. it occurred to Zeno to offer Theodoric the government of Italy, if he would conquer it from Odoacer. The Ostrogoth, who had harried the in- land of the Balkan Peninsula bare, and had met several reverses of late from the Roman arms, took the offer. He was made " patrician " and consul, and started off with all the Ostrogothic nation at his back to win the realm of Italy. After hard fighting with Odoacer and the mixed multitude of mercenaries that followed him, the Goths conquered Italy, and Theodoric — German king and Roman patrician — began to reign at Ravenna. He always professed to be the vassal and deputy of the emperor at Con- stantinople, and theoretically his conquest of Italy meant the reunion of the East and the West. But the Western realm had shrunk down to Italy and Illyricum, and the power of Zeno therein was purely nominal. With the departure of the Ostrogoths we have seen our last of the Germans in the Balkan Peninsula ; after 488 the Slavs take their place as the molesters of the Roman frontier on the Danube. VI. JUSTINIAN. The Emperor Anastasiiis died in A.D. 518 at the ripe age of eighty-eight, and his sceptre passed to Justinus, the commander of his body-guard, whom Senate and army alike hailed as most worthy to succeed the good old man. The late emperor had nephews, but he had never designated them as his heirs, and they retired into private life at his death. Justinus was well advanced in years, as all his three predecessors had been when they mounted the throne. But unlike Leo, Zeno, and Anastasius, he had won his way to the front in the army, not in the civil service. He had risen from the ranks, was a rough uncultured soldier, and is said to have been hardly able to sign his own name. His reign of nine years would have been of little note in history — for he made no wars and spent no treasure — if he had not been the means of placing on the throne of the East the greatest ruler since the death of Constantine. Justinus had no children himself, but had adopted as his heir his nephew Justinian, son of his deceased brother Sabatius. This young man, born after his 66 yUSTINIAN. father and uncle had won their way to high places in the army, was no uncultured peasant as they had been, but had been reared, as the heir of a wealthy house, in all the learning of the day. He showed from the first a keen intelligence, and applied himself with zeal to almost every department of civil life. Law, finance, administrative economy, theology, music, architecture, fortification, all were dear to him. The only thing in which he seems to have taken little per- sonal interest was military matters. His uncle trusted everything to him, and finally made him his colleague on the throne. Justinian was heir designate to the empire, and had passed the age of thirty-five, giving his contemporaries the impression that he was a staid, business-like, and eminently practical personage. " No one ever re- membered him young," it was said, and most certainly no one ever expected him to scandalize the empire by a sensational marriage. But in A.D. 526 the world learnt, to the horror of the respectable and the joy of all scandal-mongers, that he had declared his intention of taking to wife the dancer Theodora, the star of the Byzantine comic stage. So many stories have gathered around Theodora's name that it is hard to say how far her early life had been discreditable. A libellous work called the " Secret History," written by an enemy of herself and her husband, I gives us many scandalous details of her career ; but the very virulence of the book makes its tales incredible. It is indisputable, however, that Theodora was an actress, and that Roman actresses ' Certainly not by Procopius, whose name it bears. THEODORA. 67 enjoyed an unenviable reputation for light morals. There was actually a law which forbade a member of the Senate to marry an actress, and Justinian had to repeal it in order to legalize his own marriage. There had been scores of bad and reckless men on the throne before, but none of them had ever dared to commit an action which startled the world half so much as this freak of the staid Justinian. His own mother used every effort to turn him from his pur- pose, and his uncle the Emperor threatened to dis- inherit him : but he was quietly persistent, and ere the aged Justinus died he had been induced to ac- knowledge the marriage of his nephew, and to confer on Theodora the title of " Patrician." Theodora, as even her enemies allow, was the most beautiful woman of her age. Procopius, the best historian of the day, says " that it was impossible for mere man to describe her comeliness in words, or imitate it in art." All that her detractors could say was that she was below the middle height, and that her complexion was rather pale, though not unhealthy. It is unfortunate that we have no representation of her surviving, save the famous mosaic in San Vitale at Ravenna, and mosaic is of all forms of art that least suited to reproduce beauty. Whatever her early life may have been, Theodora was in spirit and intelligence well suited to be the mate of the Emperor of the East. After her mar- riage no word of scandal was breathed against her life. She rose to the height of her situation : once her courage saved her husband's throne, and always she was the ablest and the most trusted of his councillors. f- ;; W <3 O ^o ^1 yUSTINIAN'S PERSONAL CHARACTER. 69 The grave, studious, and hard-working Emperor never regretted his choice of a consort. It cannot be said, however, that either Justinian or Theodora are sympathetic characters. The Emperor was a hard and suspicious master, and not over grate- ful to subjects who served him well ; he was intolerant in religious, and unscrupulous in political matters. When his heart was set on a project he was utterly unmindful of the slaughter and ruin which it might bring upon his people. In the extent of his conquests and the magnificence of his public works, he was in- comparably the greatest of the emperors who reigned at Constantinople. But the greatness was purely personal : he left the empire weaker in resources, if broader in provinces, than he found it. Of all the great sovereigns of history he may be most fairly compared with Louis XIV. of France ; but it may be remembered to his credit in the comparison that Louis has nothing to set against Justinian's great legal work — the compilation of the Pandects and Institutes, and that Justinian's private life, unlike that of the Frenchman, was strict even to austerity. All night long, we read, he sat alone over his State papers in his cabinet, or paced the dark halls in deep thought. His sleepless vigilance so struck his subjects that the strangest legends became current even in his life- time • his ene- mies whispered that he was no mere man, but an evil spirit that required no rest. One grotesque tale even said that the Emperor had been seen long after mid- night traversing the corridors of his palace — without his head. If Justinian seemed hardly human to those who 70 * yUSTINIAN. feared him, Theodora is represented as entirely given up to pride and ambition, never forgiving an offence, but hunting to death or exile all who had crossed her in the smallest thing. She is reproached — but who that has risen from a low estate is not ? — of an inordinate love for the pomps and vanities of imperial state. High officials complained that she had as great a voice in settling political matters as her husband. Yet, on the whole, her influence would appear not to have been an evil one — historians acknowledge that she was liberal in almsgiving, religious after her own fashion, and that she often interfered to aid the oppressed. It is particularly recorded that, remem- bering the dangers of her own youth, she was zealous in establishing institutions for the reclaiming of women who had fallen into sin. The aged Justinus died in 527 A.D., and Justinian became the sole occupant of the throne, which he was destined to occupy for thirty-eight years. It was less than half the century, yet his personality seems to per- vade the whole period, and history hardly remembers the insignificant predecessors and successors whose reigns eke out the remainder of the years between 500 and 600. The empire when Justinian took it over from the hands of his uncle was in a more prosperous condition than it had known since the death of Constantine. Since the Ostrogoths had moved out of the Balkan Peninsula in A.D. 487, it had not suffered from any very long or destructive invasion from without. The Sla- vonic tribes, now heard of for the first time, and the Bukrarians had made raids across the Danube, but yUSTINIAN'S ARMY. 71 they had not yet shown any signs of setth'ng down — as the Goths had done — within the limits of the empire. Their incursions, though vexatious, were not dangerous. Still the European provinces of the empire were in worse condition than the Asiatic, and were far from having recovered the effects of the ravages of Fritigern and Aiaric, Attila, and Theo- doric. But the more fortunate Asiatic lands had hardly seen a foreign enemy for centuries.^ Except in the immediate neighbourhood of the Persian fron- tier there was no danger, and Persian wars had been infrequent of late. Southern Asia Minor had once or twice suffered from internal risings — rebellions of the warlike Isaurians— but civil war left no such perma- nent mark on the land as did barbarian invasions. On the whole, the resources of the provinces beyond the Bosphorus were intact. Justinus in his quiet reign had spent little or none of the great hoard of treasure which Anastasius had bequeathed to him. There were more than 300,000 lbs. of gold [^13,400,000] in store when Justinian came to the throne. The army, as we have had occasion to relate in the last chapter, was in good order, and com- posed in a larger proportion of born subjects of the empire than it had been at any time since the battle of Adrianople. There would appear to have been from 150,000 to 200,000 men under arms, but the extent of the frontiers of the empire were so great that Jus- tinian never sent out a single army of more than ' There had been only an isolated raids of Huns in a.d. 395, which penetrated as far as Palestine. No other invasion reached as far as Antioch. 72 yUSTINIAN. 30,000 Strong, and forces of only a third of that number are often found entrusted with such mighty enterprises as the invasion of Africa or the defence of the Armenian border. The flower of the Roman army was no longer its infantry, but its mailed horse- men {Cataphracti), armed with lance and bow, as the Parthian cavalry had once been of old. The infantry comprised more archers and javelin-men than heavy troops : the Isaurians and other provincials of the mountainous parts of Asia Minor were reckoned the best of them. Among both horse and foot large bodies of foreign auxiliaries were still found : the Huns and Arab^^ supplied light cavalry, the German Herules and Gepidae from beyond the Danube heavier troops. The weakest point in the empire when Justinian took it over was its financial system. The cardinal maxim of political economy, that " taxes should be raised in the manner least oppressive to those who pay them " was as yet undreamt of. The exaction of arbitrary customs dues, and the frequent grant of monopolies was noxious to trade. The deplorable system of tax-farming through middlemen was em- ployed in many branches of the revenue. Landed proprietors, small and great, were still mercilessly overtaxed, in consideration of their exemption from military service. The budget was always handi- capped by the necessity for providing free corn for the populace of Constantinople. Yet in spite of all these drawbacks Justinian enjoyed an enormous and steady revenue. His finance minister, John of Cap- padocia, was such an ingenious extortioner that the yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN POLICY. 73 treasury Vv^as never empty in the hardest stress of war and famine : but it was kept full at the expense of the future. The grinding taxation of Justinian's reign bore fruit in the permanent impoverishment of the provinces : his successors were never able to raise such a revenue again. Here again Justinian may well be compared to Louis XIV. Justinian's policy divides into the departments of internal and foreign affairs. Of his doings as legis- lator, administrator, theologian, and builder, we shall speak in their proper place. But the history of his foreign policy forms the main interest of his reign. He had determined to take up a task which none of his predecessors since the division of the Empire under Arcadius and Honorius had dared to contem- plate. It was his dream to re-unite under his sceptre the German kingdoms in the Western Mediterranean which had been formed out of the broken fragments of the realm of Honorius ; and to end the solemn pretence by which he was nominally acknowledged as Emperor West of the Adriatic, while really all power was in the hands of the German rulers who posed as his vicegerents. He aimed at reconquering Italy, Africa, and Spain — if not the further provinces of the old empire. We shall see that he went far towards accomplishing his intention. But during the first five years of his reign his atten- tion was distracted by other matters. The first of them was an obstinate war of four years' duration, with Kobad, King of Persia. The causes of quarrel were ultimately the rival pretensions of the Roman and Persian Empires to the suzerainty of the small 74 JUSTINIAN. states on their northern frontiers near the Black Sea, the kingdoms of Lazica and Iberia, and more proxi- mately the strengthening of the fortresses on the Mesopotamian border by Justinian. His fortification of Dara, close to the Persian frontier town of Nisibis, was the casus belli chosen by Kobad, who declared war in 528, a year after Justinian's accession. The Persian war was bloody, but absolutely inde- cisive. All the attacks of the enemy were repelled, and one great pitched battle won over him at Dara in 530. But neither party succeeded in taking a single fortress of importance from the other ; and when, on the death of Kobad, his son Chosroes made peace with the empire, the terms amounted to the restora- tion of the old frontier. The only importance of the war was that it enabled Justinian to test his army, and showed him that he possessed an officer of first- rate merit in Belisarius, the victor of the battle of Dara. This famous general was a native of the Thracian inland ; he entered the army very young, and rose rapidly, till at the age of twenty-three he was already Governor of Dara, and at twenty-five Magister militwn of the East.i His influence at Court was very great, as he had married Antonina, the favourite and confi- dante of the Empress Theodora. His position, indeed, was not unlike that which Marlborough, owing to his wife's ascendency, enjoyed at the Court of Queen Anne. Like Marlborough, too, Belisarius was ruled ' " Born in Germania, a district between Thrace and and Illyricum," says his secretary, Procopius. We do not know where the district — ^a German settlement, presumably — was situated. THE BLUES AND GREENS. 75 and bullied by his clever and unscrupulous wife. Unlike the great Duchess Sarah, Antonina never set herself to thwart her mistress ; but after Theodora's death she and her husband lost favour, and in declining years knew much the same misfortune as did the Marlboroughs. The year which saw the Persian War end [a.d. 532], saw also the rise and fall of another danger, which while it lasted was much more threatening to the Emperor's life and power. We have already noticed the " Blues " and " Greens," the great factions of the Byzantine Circus.^ All through the fifth century they had been growing stronger, and interfered more and more in politics, and even in religious controversies. To be a "Green" in 530 meant to be a partisan of the house of the late Emperor Anastasius, and a Monophysite.2 The " Blues " posed as partisans of the house of Justinus, and as strictly orthodox in matters ecclesiastical. From mere Circus factions they had almost grown into political parties ; but they still retained at the bottom many traces of their low sporting origin. The rougher elements pre- dominated in them ; they were prone to riot and mischief, and, as the events of 532 were to show, they were a serious danger to the State. In January of that year there was serious rioting in the streets. Justinian, though ordinarily he favoured the Blue faction, impartially ordered the leaders of the rioters on both sides to be put to death. ' See chap. ii. p. 22. " To hold the view which denied the existence both of a truly human and a truly Divine nature in Our Lord Jesus Christ. 76 yusTi\'iAN. Seven were selected for execution, and four of them were duly beheaded in the presence of a great and angry mob, in front of the monastery of St. Conon. The last three rioters were to be hung, but the hang- man so bungled his task that two of the criminals, one a Blue the other a Green, fell to the ground alive. The guards seized them and they were again sus- pended ; but once more — owing no doubt to the terror of the executioners at the menaces of the mob — the rope slipped. Then the multitude broke loose, the guards were swept away, and the half-hung criminals were thrust into sanctuary at the adjacent monastery. This exciting incident proved the commencement of six days of desperate rioting. The Blues and Greens united, and taking as their watchword, Nika, " conquer," swept through the city, crying for the de- position of John of Cappadocia, the unpopular finance minister, and of Eudemius, Praefect of the city, who was immediately responsible for the executions. The ordinary police of the capital were quite unable to master them, and Justinian was weak enough to pro- mise to dismiss the officials. But the mob was now quite out of hand, and refused to disperse : the trouble was fomented by the partisans of the house of the late emperor, who began to shout for the deposi- tion of Justinian, and wished to make Hypatius, nephew of Anastasius, Caesar in his stead. The city was almost empty of troops, owing to the garrison having been sent to the Persian War. The Emperor could only count on 4,000 men of the Imperial Guard, a few German auxiliaries, and a regiment THE NIKA RIOT. yj of 500 " Cataphiacti," mailed horsemen, under Beli- sarius, who had just returned from the seat of war. Beh'sarius was placed in command of the whole, and sallied out to clear the streets, but the rioters, showing the same pluck that the Byzantine mob dis- played against the soldiers of Gainas a hundred and twenty-five years before, offered a stout resistance. The main fighting took place around the great square of the Augustaeum, between the Imperial palace and the Hippodrome. In the heat of the fight the rebels set fire to the Brazen Porch by the Senate House. The Senate House caught fire, and then the conflagration spread east and north, till it was wafted across the square to St. Sophia. On the third day of the riot the great cathedral was burnt to the ground, and from thence the flames issued out to burn the hospital of Sampson and the church of St. Irene.^ The fire checked the fighting, and the insurgents were now in possession of most of the city. But they could not find their chosen leader, for the unfortunate Hypatius, who had no desire to risk his neck, had taken refuge with the Emperor in the palace. It was not till he was actually driven out by Justinian, who feared to have him about his person, that this rebel in spite of himself, fell into the hands of his own adherents. But on the sixth day of the riots they led him to the Hippodrome, installed him in the royal seat of the Kathisma, and crowned him there with a gold chain of his wife's, for want of a proper diadem. Meanwhile there was dismay and diversity of ' See map on p. 20. THEODORA IMPKKATRIX. [From the Painling by Val. Prinsep. The copyright is in the Artist's hands.'] THEODORA'S SPEECH. 79 councils in the Palace. John of Cappadocia and many other ministers strove to persuade the Emperor to fly by sea, and gather additional troops at Hera- clea. There was nothing left in his power save the palace, and they insisted that if he remained there longer he would be surrounded by the rebels and cut off from escape. It was then that the Empress Theo- dora rose to the level of the occasion, refused to fly, and urged her husband to make one final assault on the enemy. Her words are preserved by Procopius. '* This is no occasion to keep to the old rule that a woman must not speak in the council. Those who are most concerned have most right to dictate the course of action. Now every man must die once, and for a king death is better than dethronement and exile. May I never see the day when my purple robe is stripped from me, and when I am no more called Lady and Mistress ! If you wish, O Emperor, to save your life, nothing is easier : there are your ships and the sea. But / agree with the old saying that ' Empire is the best winding-sheet.' " Spurred on by his wife's bold words, Justinian ordered a last assault on the rebels, and Belisarius led out his full force. The factions were now in the Hip- podrome, saluting their newly-crowned leader with shouts of ''■ Hypatie Angiiste^ Ui vincas" preparatory to a final attack on the palace. Belisarius attacked at once all three gates of the Hippodrome : that directed against the door of the Kathisma failed, but the soldiery forced both the side entrances, and after a hard struggle the rebels were entirely routed. Crowded into the enormous building with only five exits, 8o yUSTINIAN, they fell in thousands by the swords of the victorious Imperialists. It is said that 35,000 men were slain in the six days of this great " Sedition of Nika." It is curious to learn that not even this awful slaughter succeeded in crushing the factions. We hear of the Blues and Greens still rioting on various occasions during the next fifty years. But they never came again so near to changing the course of history as in the famous rising of A.D. 532. VII. JUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. After the Persians had drawn back, foiled in their attempt to conquer Mesopotamia, and after the sup- pression of the "Nika" sedition had cowed the unruly- populace of Constantinople, Justinian found himself at last free, and was able to take in hand his great scheme for the reconquest of the lost provinces of the empire. The enforced delay of six years between his acces- sion and his first attempt to execute his great plan, was, as it happened, extremely favourable to the Em- peror. In each of the two German kingdoms with which he had first to deal, the power had passed within those six years into the hands of a weak and incapable sovereign. In Africa, Hilderic, the king of the Vandals, had been dethroned by his cousin Gelimer, a warlike and ambitious, but very incapable, ruler. In Italy, Theodoric, the great king of the Os- trogoths, had died in A.D. 526, and his grandson and successor, Athalaric, in A.D. 533. After the death of the young Athalaric, the kingdom fell to his mother, Amalasuntha, and she, compelled by Gothic public 82 yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. opinion to take a husband to rule in her behalf, had unwisely wedded Theodahat, her nearest kinsman. He was cruel, scheming, and suspicious, and mur- dered his wife, within a year of her having brought him the kingdom of Italy as a dowry. ^ Cowardly and avaricious as well as ungrateful, Theodahat pos- sessed exactly those vices which were most suited to make him the scorn of his warlike subjects ; he could count neither on their loyalty nor their respect in the event of a war. Both the Vandals in Africa and the Goths in Italy were at this time so weak as to invite an attack by an enterprising neighbour. They had, in fact, con- quered larger realms than their limited numbers were really able to control. The original tribal hordes which had subdued Africa and Italy were composed of fifty or sixty thousand warriors, with their wives and children. Now such a body concentrated on one spot was powerful enough to bear down everything before it. But when the conquerors spread them- selves abroad, they were but a sprinkling among the millions of provincials whom they had to govern. In all Italy there were probably but three cities — Ra- venna, Verona, and Pavia— in which the Ostrogoths formed a large proportion of the population. A great arm}' makes but a small nation, and the Goths and Van- dals were too few to occupy such wide tracts as Italy and Africa. They formed merely a small aristocracy, governing by dint of the ascendency which their ' The murder of Amalasuntha took place a/h-r the Roman invasion of Africa ; but Theodahat was already on the throne when the Vandal war was proceeding. WEAKNESS OF THE GOTHS TN ITALY. 83 fathers had won over the minds of the unwarlike populations which they had subdued. The only chance for the survival of the Ostrogothic and Van- dal monarchies lay in the possibility of their amal- gamating with the Roman provincial population, as the Franks, under more favourable circumstances, did with the conquered inhabitants of Gaul. This was seen by Theodoric, the great conqueror of Italy ; and he did his best to reconcile Goth and Roman, held the balance with strict justice between the two, and employed Romans as well as Goths in the govern- ment of the country. But one generation does little to assuage old hatreds such as that between the con- querors and the conquered in Italy. Theodoric was succeeded by a child, and then by a ruffian, and his work ended with him. Even he was unable to strike at the most fatal difference of all between his country- men and the Italians. The Goths were Arians, having been converted to Christianity in the fourth century by missionaries who held the Arian heresy. Their subjects, on the other hand, were Orthodox Catholics, almost without exception. When religious hatred was added to race hatred, there was hardly any hope of welding together the two nationalities. Another source of weakness in the kingdoms of Africa and Italy must be noted. The Vandals of the third generation and the Goths of the second, after their settlement in the south, seem to have degenerated in courage and stamina. It may be that the climate was unfavourable to races reared in the Danube lands; it may be that the temptations of unlimited luxury offered by Roman civilization sufficed to demoralize 84 yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. them. A Gothic sage observed at the time that " the Goth, when rich, tends to become Roman in his habits ; the Roman, when poor, Gothic in his." There was truth in this saying, and the result of the change was ominous for the permanence of the king- dom of Italy. If the masters softened and the sub- jects hardened, they would not preserve for ever their respective positions. The case of the kingdom of Africa was infinitely worse than that of the kingdom of Italy, The Van- dals were less numerous than the Goths, in proportion to their subjects ; they were not merely heretics, but fanatical and persecuting heretics, which the Goths were not. Moreover, they had never had at their head a great organizer and administrator like Theo- doric, but only a succession of turbulent princes of the Viking type, fit for war and nothing else. Justinian declared war on King Gelimer the mo- ment that he had made peace with Persia, using as his cas7{s belli, not a definite re-assertion of the claim of the empire over Africa— for such language would have provoked the rulers of Italy and Spain to join the Vandals, but the fact that Gelimer had wrong- fully deposed Hilderic, the Emperor's ally. In July, 533, Belisarius, who was now at the height of his favour for his successful suppression of the " Nika " rioters, sailed from the Bosphorus with an army of 10,000 foot and 5,000 horse. He was accompanied, luckily for history, by his secretary, Procopius, a very capable writer, who has left a full account of his master's campaigns, Belisarius landed at Tripoli, at the extreme eastern limit of the Vandal power. The town CONQUEST OF AFRICA. 85 was at once betrayed to him by its Roman inhabitants. From thence he advanced cautiously along the coast, meeting with no opposition ; for the incapable Ge- limer had been caught unprepared, and was still en- gaged in calling in his scattered warriors. It was not till he had approached within ten miles of Carthage that Belisarius was attacked by the Vandals. After a hard struggle he defeated them, and the city fell into his hands next day. The provincials were de- lighted at the rout of their masters, and welcomed the imperial army with joy ; there was neither riot nor pillage, and Carthage had not the aspect of a conquered town. Calling up his last reserves, Gelimer made one more attempt to try the fortunes of war. He advanced on Carthage, and was met by Belisarius at Tricameron, on the road to Bulla. Again the day went against him ; his army broke up, his last fortresses threw open their gates, and there was an end of the Vandal kingdom. It had existed just 104 years, since Genseric entered Africa in A.D. 429. Gelimer took refuge for a time with the Moorish tribes who dwelt in the fastnesses of Mount Atlas. But ere long he resolved to surrender himself to Belisarius, whose humanity was as well known as his courage. He sent to Carthage to say that he was about to give himself up, and — so the story goes — asked but for three things : a harp, to which to chant a dirge he had written on the fate of himself and the Vandal race ; a sponge, to wape away his tears ; and a loaf, a delicacy he had not tasted ever since he had been forced to partake of the unsavoury 86 yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. food of the Moors ! Belisarius received Gelimer with kindness, and took him to Constantinople, along with the treasures of the palace of Carthage, which in- cluded many of the spoils of Rome captured by the Vandals eighty-six years before, when they sacked the imperial city, in 453. It is said that among these spoils were some of the golden vessels of the Temple at Jerusalem, which Titus had brought in triumph to ^ CAVALRY SCOUTS. {^From a Byzantine AIS.) Rome, and which Gaiseric had carried from Rome to Carthage. The triumphal entry of Belisarius into Constanti- nople with his captives and his spoils, encouraged Justinian to order instant preparations for an attack on the second German kingdom, on his western frontier. He declared war on the wretched King Theodahat in the summer of A.D. )i^35, using as his pretext the murder of Queen Amalasuntha, whom, as we have already said, her ungrateful spouse had theodahat's augury. 87 first imprisoned and then strangled within a year of their marriage. The king of the Goths, whether he was conscience- stricken or merely cowardly, showed the greatei^t terror at the declaration of war. He even wrote to Constantinople offering to resign his crown, if the Emperor would guarantee his life and his private property. Meanwhile he consulted soothsayers and magicians about his prospects, for he was as super- stitious as he was incompetent. Procopius tells us a strange tale of the doings of a Jewish magician of note, to whom Theodahat applied. He took thirty pigs — to represent unclean Gentiles, we must sup- pose — and penned them in three styes, ten in each. The one part he called "Goths," the second "Italians," and the third " Imperialists." He left the beasts without food or water for ten days, and bade the king visit them at the end of that time, and take augury from their condition. When Theodahat looked in he found all but two of the "Goth" pigs dead, and half of the " Italians," but the " Imperialists," though gaunt and wasted, were all, or almost all, alive. This por- tent the Jew expounded as meaning that at the end of the approaching war the Gothic race would be ex- terminated and their Italian subjects terribly thinned, while the Imperial troops would conquer, though with toil and difficulty. While Theodahat was busying himself with por- tents, actual war had broken out on the Illyrian frontier between the Goths and the governor of Dal- matia. There was no use in making further offers to Justinian, and the king of Italy had to face the situa- tion as best he could. 8S yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. In the summer of 535, Belisarius landed in Sicily, with an even smaller army than had been given him to conquer Africa — only 3,000 Roman troops, all Isaurians, and 4,500 barbarian auxiliaries of different sorts. Belisarius' first campaign was as fortunate as had been that which he had waged against Gelimer. All the Sicilian towns threw open their gates except Palermo, where there was a considerable Gothic gar- rison, and Palermo fell after a short siege. In six months the whole island was in the hands of Belisarius. Theodahat seemed incapable of defending himself; he fell into a condition of abject helplessness, which so provoked his warlike subjects, that when the news came that Belisarius had crossed over into Italy and taken Rhegium, they rose and slew him. In his stead the army of the Goths elected as their king Witiges, a middle-aged warrior, well known for personal courage and integrity, but quite incompetent to face the im- pending storm. After the fall of Rhegium, Belisarius marched rapidly on Naples, meeting no opposition ; for the Goths were very thinly scattered through Southern Italy, and had not even enough men to garrison the Lucanian and Calabrian fortresses. Naples was taken by surprise, the Imperialists finding their way within the walls by crawling up a disused aqueduct. After this important conquest, Belisarius made for Rome, though his forces were reduced to a mere handful by the necessity of leaving garrisons in his late conquests. King Witiges made no effort to obstruct his approach. He had received news that the Franks THE GOTHS BESIEGE ROME. 89 were threatening an evasion of Northern Italy, and went north to oppose an imaginary danger in the Alps, when he should have been defending the line of the Tiber. Having staved off the danger of a Prankish war by ceding Provence to King Theuderic, Witiges turned back, only to learn that Rome was now in the hands of the enemy. The troops of Leu- daris, the Gothic general, who had been left with 4,000 men to defend the city, had been struck with panic at the approach of Belisarius, and were cowardly and idiotic enough to evacuate it without striking a blow. Five thousand men had sufficed to seize the ancient capital of the world ! [December, 536.] Next spring King Witiges came down with the main army of the Goths — more than 100,000 strong — and laid siege to Rome. The defence of the town by Belisarius and his very inadequate garrison forms the most interesting episode in the Italian war. For more than a year the Ostrogoths lay before its walls, essaying every device to force an entry. They tried open storm ; they endeavoured to bribe traitors within the city ; they strove to creep along the bed of a dis- used aqueduct, as Belisarius had done a year before at Naples. All was in vain, though the besiegers outnumbered the garrison twenty-fold, and exposed their lives with the same recklessness that their an- cestors had shown in the invasion of the empire a hundred years back. The scene best remembered in the siege was the simultaneous assault on five points in the wall, on the 21st of March, 537. Three of the attacks were beaten back with ease ; but near the Prsenestine Gate, at the south-east of the city, one go yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. storming party actually forced its way within the walls, and had to be beaten out by sheer hard fighting ; and at the mausoleum of Hadrian, on the north-west, another spirited combat took place. Hadrian's tomb — a great quadrangular structure of white marble, 300 feet square and 85 feet high — was surmounted by one of the most magnificent collections of statuary in ancient Rome, including four great equestrian statues of emperors at its corners. The Goths, with their ladders, swarmed at the foot of the tomb in such numbers, that the arrows and darts of the defenders were insufficient to beat them back. Then, as a last resource, the Imperialists tore down tKe scores of statues which adorned the mausoleum, and crushed the mass of assailants beneath a rain of marble frag- ments. Two famous antiques, that form the pride of modern galleries — the " Dancing Faun " at Florence, and the " Barberini Faun " at Munich — were found, a thousand years later, buried in the ditch of the tomb of Hadrian, and must have been among the missiles employed against the Goths. The rough usage which they then received proved the means of preserving them for the admiration of the modern world. A year and nine days after he had formed the siege of Rome, the unlucky Witiges had to abandon it. His army, reduced by sword and famine, had given up all hope of success, and news had just arrived that the Imperialists had launched a new army against Ravenna, the Gothic capital. Belisarius, indeed, had just received a reinforcement of 6,000 or 7,000 men, and had wisely sent a considerable force, under an officer named John, to fall on the Adriatic coast. BELISARIUS TAKES RAVENNA. QI The scene of the war was now transported further to the north ; but its character still remained the sanne. The Romans gained territory, the Goths lost it. Firmly fixed at Ancona and Rimini and Osimo, Beli- sarius gradually forced his way nearer to Ravenna, and, in A.D. 540 laid siege to it. Witiges, blockaded by Belisarius in his capital, made no such skilful defence as did his rival at Rome three years before. To add to his troubles, the Franks came down into Northern Italy, and threatened to conquer the valley of the Po, the last Gothic stronghold. Witiges then made proposals for submission ; but Belisarius refused to grant any terms other than unconditional sur- render, though his master Justinian was ready to acknowledge Witiges as vassal-king in Trans-Padane Italy. Famine drove Ravenna to open its gates, and the Goths, enraged at their imbecile king, and struck with admiration for the courage and generosity of Beli- sarius, offered to make their conqueror Emperor of the West. The loyal general refused ; but bade the Goths disperse each to his home, and dwell peaceably for the future as subjects of the empire. [May, 540 A.D.] He himself, taking the great Gothic treasure- hoard from the palace of Theodoric, and the captive Witiges, sailed for Constantinople, and laid his trophies at his master's feet. Italy now seemed even as Africa ; only Pavia and Verona were still held by Gothic garrisons, and when he sailed home, Belisarius deemed his work so nearly done, that his lieutenants would suffice to crush out the last embers of the strife. He himself was re- quired in the East, for a new Persian war with Chos- 92 yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS^ roes, son of Kobad, was on the eve of breaking out. But things were not destined to end so. At the last moment the Goths found a king and a hero to rescue them, and the conquest of Italy was destined to be deferred for twelve years more. Two ephemeral rulers reigned for a few months at Pavia, and came to bloody ends ; but their successor was Baduila/ the noblest character of the sixth century — " the first knight of the Middle Ages," as he has been called. When the generals of Justinian marched against him, to finish the war by the capture of Verona and Pavia, he v/on over them the first victory that the Goths had obtained since their enemies landed in Italy. This was followed by two more successes ; the scattered armies of Witiges rallied round the banner of the new king, and at once the cities of Central and Southern Italy began to fall back into Gothic hands, with the same rapidity with which they had yielded to Belisarius. The fact was, that the war had been a cruel strain on the Italians, and that the imperial governors, and still more their fiscal agents, or "logo- thetes," had become unbearably oppressive. Italy had lived through the fit of enthusiasm with which it had received the armies of Justinian, and was now regretting the days of Theodoric as a long-lost golden age. Most of its cities were soon in Baduiia's hands ; the Imperialists retained only the districts round Rome, Naples, Otranto, and Ravenna. Of Naples they were soon deprived. [B.C. 543.] Baduila invested it, and • The king's real name was Baduila, as shown on his coins, and recorded by some historians, but Imperialist writers always call him Totila, which seems to have been a nickname. BADUILA CONQUERS ITALY. 93 ere long constrained it to surrender. He treated the inhabitants with a kindness and consideration which no Roman general, except Belisarius, had ever dis- played. A speech which he delivered to his generals soon after this success deserves a record, as showing the character of the man. A Gothic warrior had been convicted of violating the daughter of a Roman. Baduila condemned him to death. His officers came round him to plead for the soldier's life. He an- swered them that they must choose that day whether they preferred to save one man's life or the life of the Gothic race. At the beginning of the war, as they knew well, the Goths had brave soldiers, famous generals, countless treasure, horses, weapons, and all the forts of Italy. And yet under Theodahat — a man who loved gold better than justice — they had so angered God by their unrighteous lives, that all the troubles of the last ten years had come upon them. Now God seemed to have avenged Himself on them enough. He had begun a new course with them, and they must begin a new course with Him, and justice was the only path. As for the present criminal being a valiant hero, let them know that the unjust man and the ravisher was never brave in fight ; but that, according to a man's life, such was his luck in battle. Such was the justice of Baduila ; and it seemed as if his dream was about to come true, and that the regenerate Goths would win back all that they had lost. Ere long he was at the gates of Rome, prepared to essay, with 15,000 men, what Witiges had failed to do with 100,000. Lest all his Italian conquests should be lost, Justinian was obliged to send back 94 yUSTINIAN'S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. Belisarius, for no one else could hold back the Goths. But Belisarius was ill-supplied with men ; he had fallen into disfavour at Court, and the imperial ministers stinted him of troops and money. Unable to relieve Rome, he had to wait at Portus, by the mouth of the Tiber, watching for a chance to enter the city. That chance he never got. The famine- stricken Romans, angry with the cruel and avaricious Bessas, who commanded the garrison, began to long for the victory of their enemy ; and one night some traitors opened the Asinarian Gate, and let in Bad- uila and his Goths. The King thought that his troubles were over ; he assembled his chiefs, and bade them observe how, in the time of Witiges, 7,000 Greeks had conquered, and robbed of kingdom and liberty, 100,000 well-armed Goths. But now that they were few, poor, and wretched, the Goths had conquered more than 20,000 of the enemy. And why ? Because of old they looked to anything rather than justice : they had sinned against each other and the Romans. Therefore they must choose hence- forth, and be just men and have God with them, or unjust and have God against them. Baduila had determined to do that which no general since Hannibal had contemplated : he would destroy Rome, and with it all the traditions of the world- empire of the ancient city — to him they seemed but snares, tending to corrupt the mind of the Goths. The people he sent away unharmed — they were but a few thousand left after the horrors of the famine dur- ing the siege. But he broke down the walls, and dis- mantled the palaces and arsenals. For a few weeks DEATH OF KING BADUILA. 95 Rome was a deserted city, given up to the wolf and the owl [A.D. 550]. For eleven unquiet years, Baduila, the brave and just, ruled Italy, holding his own against Belisarius, till the great general was called home by some wretched court intrigue. But presently Justinian gathered another army, more numerous than any that Beli- sarius had led, and sent it to Italy, under the com- mand of the eunuch Narses. It was a strange choice that made the chamberlain into a general ; but it succeeded. Narses marched round the head of the Adriatic, and invaded Italy from the north. Bad- uila went forth to meet him at Tagina, in the Apen- nines. For a long day the Ostrogothic knights rode again and again into the Imperialist ranks ; but all their furious charges failed. At evening they reeled back broken, and their king received a mortal wound in the flight [a.d. 553]. With the death of Baduila, it was all up with the Goths ; their hero's knightly courage and kingly righteousness had not sufficed to save them from the same doom which had overtaken the Vandals. The broken army made one last stand in Campania, under a chief named Tela ; but he was slain in battle at Nuceria, and then the Goths surrendered. They told Narses that the hand of God was against them ; they would quit Italy, and go back to dwell in the north, in the land of their fathers. So the poor remnant of the conquering Ostrogoths marched off, crossed the Po and the Alps, and passed away into oblivion in the northern darkness. The scheme of Justinian was complete. Italy was his ; but an Italy 96 yUSTINIAN\S FOREIGN CONQUESTS. SO wasted and depopulated, that the traces of the ancient Roman rule had almost vanished, " The land," says a contemporary chronicler, " was reduced to primeval solitude " — war and famine had swept it bare. It is strange to find that the Emperor was not tired DF.TAII.S OF ST. SOPHIA. out by waging this desperate war with the Goths ; the moment it ended he began to essay another western conquest. There was civil war in Spain, and, taking advantage of it, Liberius, governor of Africa, landed in Andalusia, and rapidly took the great towns of the south of the peninsula— Cordova, yUSTINIAN S SPANISH COAQUESTS. 97 Cartagena, Malaga, and Cadiz. The factious Visi- goths then dropped their strife, united in arms under King Athangild, and checked the further progress of the imperial arms. But a long slip of the lost terri- tory was not recovered by them. Justinian and his successors, down to A.D. 623, reigned over the greater part of the sea-coast of Southern Spain. VIII. THE END OF JUSTINIAN'S REIGN. The slackness with which the generals of Justinian prosecuted the Gothic war in the period between the triumph of Belisarius at Ravenna in A.D. 540, and the final conquest of Italy in A.D. 553, is mainly to be explained by the fact that, just at the moment of the fall of Ravenna, the empire became involved in a new struggle with its great Eastern neighbour. Chosroes of Persia was seriously alarmed at the African and Italian conquests of Justinian, and remembered that he too, as well as the Vandals and Goths, was in possession of provinces that had formerly been Roman, and might one day be re- claimed by the Emperor. He determined to strike before Justinian had got free from his Italian war, and while the flower of the Roman army was still in the West. Using as his pretext for war some petty quarrels between two tribes of Arabs, subject res- pectively to Persia and the empire, he declared war in the spring of A.D. 540. Justinian, as the king had hoped, was caught unprepared : the army of the Euphrates was so weak that it never dared face the FALL OF ANTIOCH. 99 Persians in the field, and the opening of the war was fraught with such a disaster to the empire as had not been known since the battle of Adrianople, more than a hundred and sixty years before. Avoiding the fortresses of Mesopotamia, Chosroes, who led his army in person, burst into Northern Syria. His main object was to strike a blow at Antioch, the metropolis of the East, a rich city that had not seen an enemy for nearly three centuries, and was reckoned safe from all attacks owing to its distance from the frontier. Antioch had a strong garrison of 6,000 men and the " Blues " and " Greens " of its circus factions had taken arms to support the regular troops. But the commander was incompetent, and the fortifications had been somewhat neglected of late. After a sharp struggle, Chosroes took the town by assault ; the garrison cut its way out, and many of the inhabitants escaped with it, but the city was sacked from cellar to garret and thousands of captives were dragged away by the Persians. Chosroes planted them by the Euphrates — as Nebuchadnezzar had done of old with the Jews — and built for them a city which he called Chosro- antiocheia, blending his own name with that of their ancient abode. This horrible disaster to the second city of the Roman East roused all Justinian's energy ; neglect- ing the Italian war, he sent all his disposable troops to the Euphrates frontier, and named Belisarius himself as the chief commander. After this, Chosroes won no such successes as had distinguished his first campaign. Having commenced an attack on the lOO THE END OF JUSTINIAN S REIGN. Roman border fortresses in Colchis, far to the north, he was drawn home by the news that Belisarius had invaded Assyria and was besieging Nisibis. On the approach of the king the imperial general retired, but his manoeuvre had cost the Persian the fruits of a whole summer's preparation, and the year B.C. 541 ended without serious fighting. In the next spring very similar operations followed : Belisarius defended the line of the Euphrates with success, and the invaders retired after having reduced one single Mesopotamian fortress. The war lingered for two years more, till Chosroes, disgusted at the ill-success of all his efforts since his first success at Antioch, and more especially humiliated by a bloody repulse from the walls of Edessa, consented to treat for peace [a.d. 545]. He gave up his conquests — which were of small importance — but regarded the honours of the war as being his own, because Justinian consented to pay him 2,000 lbs. of gold [i^io8,000] on the ratification of the treaty. One curious clause was inserted in the document — though hostilities ceased everywhere else, the rights of the two monarchs to the suzerainty of the kingdom of Lazica, on the Colchian frontier, hard by the Black Sea, were left undefined. For no less than seven years a sort of by-war was maintained in this small district, while peace prevailed on all other points of the Perso-Roman frontier. It was not till A.D. 556, after both parties had wasted much treasure and many men on the unprofitable contest, that Chosroes resigned the attempt to hold the small and rugged mountain kingdom of the Lazi, and resigned it to THE GREAT PLAGUE. lOI Justinian on the promise of an annual grant of ;^i 8,000 as compensation money. But although Justinian had brought his second Persian war to a not unsuccessful end, the empire had come badly out of the struggle, and was by 556 falling into a condition of incipient disorder and decay. This was partly caused by the reckless financial expedients of the Emperor, who taxed the provinces with unexampled rigour while forced to maintain at once a Persian and an Italian war. The main part of the damage, however, was wrought by other than human means. In A.D. 542 there broke out in the empire a plague such as had not been known for three hundred years — the last similar visitation had fallen in the reign of Tre- bonianus Gallus, far back in the third century. This pestilence was one of the epoch-making events in the history of the empire, as great a landmark as the Black Death in the history of England. The details which Procopius gives us concerning its progress and results leave no doubt that it operated more power- fully than any other factor in that weakening of the empire which is noticeable in the second half of the sixth century. When it reached Constantinople, 5,000 persons a day are said to have fallen victims to it. All customary occupations ceased in the city, and the market-place was empty save for corpse- bearers. In many houses not a single soul remained alive, and the government had to take special measures for the burial of neglected corpses. " The disease," says the chronicler, " did not attack any particular race or class of men, nor prevail in any 102 THE END OF yUSTINIAN'S REIGN. particular region, nor confine itself to any period of the year. Summer or winter, North or South, Greek or Arabian, washed or unwashed — of such distinctions the plague took no account. A man might climb to the hill-top, and it was there ; he might retire to the depths of a cavern, and it was there also." The only marked characteristic of its ravages that the chronicler could find was that, " whether by chance or providential design, it strictly spared the most wicked." ^ Justinian himself fell ill of the plague : he re- covered, but was never his old self again. Though he persevered inflexibly to his last day in his scheme for the reconquest of the empire, yet he seems to have declined in energy, and more especially to have lost that power of organization, which had been his most marked characteristic. The chroniclers com- plain that he had grown less hopeful and less masterful. " After achieving so much in the days of his vigour, when he entered into the last stage of his life he seemed to weary of his labours, and preferred to create discord among his foes or to mollify them with gifts, instead of trusting to his arms and facing the dangers of war. So he allowed his troops to decline in numbers, because he did not expect to require their services. And his ministers, who collected his taxes and maintained his armies were affected with the same indifference." ^ One feature of the Emperor's later j-ears was that he took more and more interest in theological ' Bury's " Later Roman Empire," i. 402. ' Agathias. yUSTJNIAN AS THEOLOGIAN. IO3 disputes, even to the neglect of State business. The Church question of the day was the dispute on Monophysitism, the heresy which denied the existence both of a human and a divine nature in Our Lord. Justinian was not a monophysite himself, but wished to unify the sect with the main body of the Church by edicts of comprehension, which forbade the discussion of the subject, and spent much trouble in coercing prelates orthodox and heretical into a reconciliation which had no chance of permanent success. His chief difficulty was with the bishops of Rome. He forced Pope Vigilius to come to Constantinople, and kept him under constraint for many months, till he signed all that was required of him [a.d. 554]. The only result was to win Vigilius the reputation of a heretic, and to cause a growing estrangement between East and West. The gloom of Justinian's later years was even more marked after the death of his wife ; Theodora died in A.D. 548, six years after the great plague, and it may be that her loss was no less a cause of the diminished energy of his later years than was his enfeebled health. Her bold and adventurous spirit must have buoyed him up in many of the more difficult enterprizes of the first half of his reign. After her death, Justinian seems to have trusted no one : his destined successor, Justinus, son of his sister, was kept in the background, and no great minister seems to have possessed his confidence. Even Belisarius, the first and most loyal soldier of the empire, does not appear to have been trusted : in the second Gothic war the Emperor stinted him of 104 ^^^ ^^^ ^^ yUSTINIAN'S REIGN. troops and hampered him with colleagues. At last he was recalled [a.d. 549] and sent into private life, from which he was only recalled on the occurrence of a sudden military crisis in A.D. 558. This crisis w^as a striking example of the mis- management of Justinian's later years. A nomad horde from the South Russian steppes, the Cotrigur Huns, had crossed the frozen Danube at mid-winter, when hostilities were least expected, and thrown themselves on the Thracian provinces. The empire had 150,000 men under arms at the moment, but they were all dispersed abroad, many in Italy, others in Africa, others in Spain, others in Colchis, some in the Thebaid, and a few on the Mesopotamian frontier. There was such a dearth of men to defend the home provinces that the barbarians rode unhindered over the whole country side from the Danube to the Propontis plundering and burning. One body, only 7,000 strong, came up to within a few miles of the city gates, and inspired such fear that the Con- stantinopolitans began to send their money and church-plate over to Asia. Justinian then summoned Belisarius from his retirement, and placed him in command of what troops there were available— a single regiment of 300 veterans from Italy, and the " Scholarian guards," a body of local troops 3,500 strong, raised in the city and entrusted with the charge of its gates, which inspired little con- fidence as its members were allowed to practice their trades and avocations and only called out in rotation for occasional service. With this undisciplined force, which had never seen war, at his back, Belisarius BELISARIUS DEFEATS THE HUNS I05 contrived to beat off the Huns. He led them to pursue him back to a carefully prepared position, where the only point that could be attacked was covered with woods and hedges on either side. The untrustworthy " Scholarians " were placed on the flanks, where they could not be seriously molested, while the 300 Italian veterans covered the one vulnerable point. The Huns attacked, were shot down from the woods and beaten off in front, and fled leaving 400 men on the field, while the Romans only lost a few wounded and not a single soldier slain. Thus the last military exploit of Belisarius preserved the suburbs of the imperial city itself from molestation ; after defending Old Rome in his prime, he saved New Rome in his old age. Even this last service did not prevent Justinian from viewing his great servant with suspicion. Four years later an obscure conspiracy against his life was discovered, and one of the conspirators named Beli- sarius as being privy to the plot. The old emperor affected to believe the accusation, sequestrated the general's property, and kept him under surveillance for eight months. Belisarius was then acquitted and restored to favour : he lived two years longer, and died in March, 565. ^ The ungrateful master whom he had served so well followed him to the grave nine months later. Of Justinian as conqueror and governor we have ' It is comforting to know that the popular legend which tells how the great general lived in poverty and disgrace, begging the passer-by "dare obolum Belisario," and dying in the streets, is untrue. But the suspicious emperor's conduct was quite unpardonable. I06 THE END OF yUSTINIAN'S REIGN. said much. But there remain two more aspects of his life which deserve notice— his work as a builder and his codification of the laws. From the days of Diocletian the style of architecture which we call Byzantine, for want of a better name, had been slowly developing from the old classic forms, and many of the emperors of the fourth and fifth cen- turies had been given to building. But no previous monarch had combined in such a degree as did Justinian the will and the power to launch out into architectural experiments. He had at his disposal the hoarded treasures of Anastasius, and his tastes were as magnificent as those of the great builders of the early empire, Augustus and Nero and Hadrian. All over the empire the monuments of his wealth and taste were seen in dozens of churches, halls of justice, monasteries, forts, hospitals, and colonnades. The historian Procopius was able to compose a considerable volume entirely on the subject of Justinian's buildings, and numbers of them survive, some perfect and more in ruins, to witness to the accuracy of the work. Even in the more secluded or outlying portions of the empire, any fine building that is found is, in two cases out of three, one of the works of Justinian. Not merely great centres like Constantinople or Jerusalem, but out-of-the-way tracts in Cappadocia and Isauria, are full of his buildings. Even in the newly-conquered Ravenna his great churches of San Vitale, containing the celebrated mosaic portraits of himself and his wife, and of St. Apollinare in the suburb of Classis, outshine the older works of the fifth-century emperors and of the Goth Theodoric. BUILDING OF ST. SOPHIA. I07 Justinian's churches, indeed, are the best known of his buildings. In Oriental church-architecture his reign forms a landmark : up to his time Christian architects had still been using two patterns copied straight from Old Roman models. The first was the round domed church, whose origin can be traced back to such Roman originals as the celebrated Temple of Vesta — of such the Church of the Holy Sepulchre at Rome may serve as a type. The second was the rectangular church with apses, which was nothing more than an adaptation for ecclesiastical purposes of the Old Roman law-courts, and which had bor- rowed from them its name of Basilica. St. Paul's Outside the Walls, at Rome is a fair specimen. Jus- tinian brought into use for the first time on a large scale the combination of a cruciform ground-plan and a very large dome. The famous Church of St. Sophia may serve as the type of this style. The great cathedral of Constantinople had already been burnt down twice, as we have had occasion to relate : the first time on the eve of the banishment of John Chrysostom, the second in the great " Nika " riot of 532. Within forty days of its destruction Justinian had commenced preparations for rebuilding it as a monument of his triumph in the civil strife. He chose as his architect Anthemius of Tralles, the greatest of Byzantine builders, and one of the few whose names have survived. The third church was different in plan from either of* its predecessors, show- ing the new combination which we have already specified. It is a Greek cross, 241 feet long and 224 broad, having in its midst a vast dome, pierced by no PROCOPIUS ON ST. SOPHIA. lOQ less than forty windows, light and airy and soaring i8o feet above the floor. In the nave the aisles and side apses are parted from the main central spaces by magnificent colonnades of marble pillars, the majority of verde antique. These are not for the most part the work of Justinian's day, but were plundered from the chief pagan temples of Asia, which served as an inexhaustible quarry for the Christian builder. The whole of the interior, both roof and dome, was covered with gilding or mosaics, which the Van- dalism of the Turks has covered with a coat of whitewash, to hide the representations of human forms which are offensive to the Moslems' creed. Procopius describes the church with enthusiasm, and his praises are well justified — " It presents a most glorious spectacle, extraordi- nary to those who behold it, and altogether incredible to those who know it by report only. In height it rises to the very heavens, and overtops the neighbour- ing buildings like a ship anchored among them. It towers above the city which it adorns, and from it the whole of Constantinople can be beheld, as from a watch-tower. Its breadth and length are so judi- ciously chosen, that it appears both broad and long without disproportion. For it excels both in size and harmony, being more magnificent than ordinary buildings, and much more elegant than the few which approach it in size. Within it is singularly full of light and sunshine ; you would declare that the place is not lighted from without, but that the rays are produced within itself, such an abundance of light is GALLERIES OK ST. SOPHIA. yUSTTNIAN'S FORTS. Ill poured into it. The gilded ceiling adds glory to its interior, though the light reflected upon the gold from the marble surpasses it in beauty. Who can tell of the splendour of the columns and marbles with which the church is adorned ? One would think that one had come upon a meadow full of flowers in bloom — one wonders at the purple tints of some, the green of others, the glowing red and glittering white, and those, too, which nature, like a painter, has marked with the strongest contrasts of colour. Moreover, it is impossible accurately to describe the treasures of gold and silver plate and gems which the Emperor has presented to the church : the Sanctuary alone contains forty thousand pounds weight of silver." Justinian was almost as great a builder of forts as of churches, but his military works have for the most part disappeared. It may give some idea of his energy in fortifying the frontiers when we state that the Illyrian provinces alone were protected by 294 forts, of which Procopius gives a list, disposed in four successive lines from the Danube back to the Thessa- lian hills. Some were single towers, but many were elaborate fortresses with outworks, and all had to be protected by garrisons. Thus much of Justinian as builder : space fails to enumerate a tithe of his works. Of his great legal achievement we must speak at even shorter length. The Roman law, as he received it from his prede- cessors was an enormous mass of precedents and decisions, in which the original basis was overlaid with the various and sometimes contradictory re- 112 THE END OF JUSTINIAN S REIGN. scripts of five centuries of emperors. Several of his predecessors, and most especially Theodosius II., had endeavoured to codify the chaotic mass and reduce it to order. But no one of them had produced a code which sufficed to bring the law of the day into full accord with the spirit of the times. It was no mean work to bring the ancient legislation of Rome, from the days of the Twelve Tables down to the days of Justinian, into strict and logical connection with the new Christian ideas which had worked their way into predominance since the days of Constantine. Much of the old law was hopelessly obsolete, owing to the change in moral ideas which Christianity had intro- duced, but it is still astonishing to see how much of the old forms of the times of the early empire survived into the sixth century. Justinian employed a commission, headed by the clever but unpopular lawyer Tribonian, to draw up his new code. The work was done for ever and a day, and his " Insti- tutes " and " Pandects " were the last revision of the Old Roman laws, and the starting-point of all systematic legal study in Europe, when, six hundred years later, the need for something more than cus- tomary folk-right began to make itself felt, as mediae- val civilization evolved itself out of the chaos of the dark ages. If the Roman Empire had flourished in the century after Justinian as in that which preceded him, other revisers of the laws might have produced compilations that would have made the " Institutes" seem out of date. But, as a matter of fact, decay and chaos followed after Justinian, and succeeding emperors had neither the need nor the inclination IMMORTALITY OF yUSTINIAN. II3 to do his work over again. Hence it came to pass that his name is for ever associated with the last great revision of Roman law, and that he himself went down to posterity as the greatest of legis- lators, destined to be enthroned by Dante in one of the starry thrones of his " Paradise," and to be worshipped as the father of law by all the legists of the Renaissance, IX. THE COMING OF THE SLAVS. The thirty years which followed the death of Justinian are covered by three reigns, those of Justinus II. [565-578], Tiberius Constantinus [578- 582], and Maurice [582-602]. These three emperors were men of much the same character as the prede- cessors of Justinian ; each of them was an experienced official of mature age, who was selected b}- the reign- ing emperor as his most worthy successor. Justinus was the favourite nephew of Justinian, and had served him for many years as Curopalates, or Master of the Palace. Tiberius Constantinus was " Count of the Excubiti," a high Court officer in the suite of Justinus : Maurice again served Tiberius as " Count of the Foederati," or chief of the Barbarian auxiliaries. They were all men of capacity, and strove to do their best for the empire : historians concur in praising the justice of Justinus, the liberality and humanity of Tiberius, the piety of Maurice. Yet under them the empire was steadily going down hill : the exhausting effects of the reign of Justinian were making them- selves felt more and more, and at the end of the reign THE LOMBARDS. 115 of Maurice a time of chaos and disaster was impend- ing, which came to a head under his successor. The internal causes of the disaster of this time were the weakening of the empire by the great plague of 544 and still more by the grinding exactions of Justinian's financial system. Its external phenomena were invasions by new hordes from the north, com- bined with long and exhausting wars with Persia. The virtues of the emperors seem to have helped them little : Justin's justice made him feared rather than loved ; Tiberius's liberality rendered him popular, but drained the treasury ; Maurice, on the other hand, who was economical and endeavoured to fill the coffers which his predecessors had emptied, was there- fore universally condemned as avaricious. The troubles on the frontier which vexed the last thirty years of the sixth century were due to three separate sets of enemies — the Lombards in Italy, the Slavs and Avars in the Balkan Peninsula, and the Persians in the East. The empire held undisputed possession of Italy for no more than fifteen years after the expulsion of the Ostrogoths in A.D. 553. Then a new enemy came in from the north, following the same path that had already served for the Visigoths of Alaric and the Ostrogoths of Theodoric. The new-comers were the race of the Lombards, who had hitherto dwelt in Hungary, on the Middle Danube, and had more fre- quently been found as friends than as foes of the Romans. But their warlike and ambitious King Alboin, having subdued all his nearer neighbours, began to covet the fertile plains of Italy, where Il6 THE COMING OF THE SLAVS. he saw the emperors keeping a very inadequate garrison, now tliat the Ostrogoths were finally driven away. In A.D. 568 Alboin and his hordes crossed the Alps, bringing with them wife and child, and flocks and herds, while their old land on the Danube was abandoned to the Avars. The Lombards took possession of the flat country in the north of Italy, as far as the line of the Po, with very little difficulty. The region, we are told, was almost uninhabited owing to the combined effects of the great plague and the Ostrogothic war. In this once fertile and populous, but now deserted, lowland, the Lom- bards settled down in great numbers. There they have left their name as the permanent denomination of the plain of Lombardy. Only one city, the strong fortress of Pavia, held out against them for long ; when it fell in 571, after a gallant defence of three years, Alboin made it his capital, instead of choosing one of the larger and more famous towns of Milan and Verona, the older centres of life in the land he had conquered. After subduing Lombardy the king pushed forward into Etruria, and overran the valley of the Arno. But in the midst of his wars he was cut off, if the legend tells us the truth, by the vengeance of his wife Queen Rosamund. She was the daughter of Cunimund, King of the Gepidse, whom Alboin had slain in battle. The fallen monarch's skull was, by the victor's orders, mounted in gold and fashioned into a cup. Long years after, amid the revelry of a drink- ing bout, Alboin had the ghastly cup filled with wine, and bade his wife bear it around to his chosen warriors. The queen obeyed, but vowed to revenge LOMBARD CONQUESTS TN ITALY. 11 7 herself by her husband's death. By the sacrifice of her lionour she bribed Alboin's armour-bearer to slay his master in his bed, and then fled with him to Constan- timople [a.d. 573]. But the death of Alboin did not put an end to the Lombard conquests in Italy. The kingdom, indeed, broke up for a time into several independent duchies, but the Lombard chiefs continued to win territory from the empire. Two of them founded the considerable duchies of Spoleto and Benevento, the one in Central, and the other in Southern Italy. These states sur- vived as independent powers, but the rest of the Lombard territories were reunited by King Autharis, in 584, and he and his immediate successors com- pleted the conquest of Northern Italy. Thus, during the reigns of Justin, Tiberius II., and Maurice, the greater part of Justinian's Italian con- quests were lost, and formed once more into Teutonic states. The emperor retained only two large stretches of territory, the one in Central Italy, where he held a broad belt of land, extending right across the penin- sula, from Ravenna and Ancona on the Adriatic, to Rome on the Tyrrhenian Sea ; the other comprehend- ine the extreme south of the land — the " toe " and "heel" of the Italian boot — and comprising the territory of Bruttium and the Calabrian ' towns of Taranto, Brindisi, and Otranto. Sardinia and Sicily were also left untouched by the Lombards, who never succeeded in building a fleet. The Roman territory which stretched across Central Italy cut the Lombards ' Calabria is here used in its old sense, meaning South Apulia, and not the extreme point of Italy down by Reggie and Squillace. ii8 THE COMING OF THE SLAVS. in two, the king ruling the main body of them in Tuscany and the valley of the Po ; while the dukes CROSS OF JUSTIN'US II. (From the Vatican.) {From '' LArt Byzantin" Far C. Bayet. Paris, Qiiantin, li ■) of Spoleto and Benevento maintained an isolated existence in the south. RISE OF THE PAPACY. II9 This partition of Italy between the Lombards and the empire is worth remembering, from the fact that never again, till our own day, was the whole peninsula gathered into a single state. Not till 1870, when the kingdom of United Italy was completed by the conquest of Rome, did a time come when all the lands between the Alps and the Straits of Messina were governed by one ruler. Justinian had no suc- cessor till Victor Emmanuel. After the Lombard conquest the imperial dominion7 Bohemia. This wretched rehgious war directed the strength of Hungary northward when it was wanted in the south. Without such a power to back them the Servians, though they recovered their own Hberty as a result of the battle of Angora, could do nothing towards driving the Turks from the Balkans. There was never any sympathy between Serb and Magyar, and save under the direct pressure of fear of a Moslem invasion they would not act together. The Hungarian kings had always laid claim to a suzerainty over the crown of Servia, and from time to time tried to con- vert their neighbours to Roman Catholicism by force of arms. Hence there was no love lost between them, and a crusade to expel the Turks was never concerted. Mahomet the Unifier died in 1421, and evil days at once set in for Constantinople and for Christendom, when his ambitious son Murad H. came to the throne. Manuel Paleologus was one of the first to feel the change in the times. He tried to make trouble for Murad, by supporting against him two claimants to the Ottoman Sultanate, each named Mustapha, one the uncle, the other the brother of the new ruler. This drew down on the empire the fate which had been delayed since 1370: the Sultan declared war on Manuel, took one after another all the fortresses which had been recovered by the peace of 1403, and finally laid siege to Constantinople. For the last time the walls of the city proved strong enough to repulse an assault. Though Murad levelled against them cannon, then seen for the first time in the East, built movable towers to shelter his troops, and launched his terrible Janissaries to the assault, he could not arai;e,s(,>ue desi(;n from a uvzamine m.->. {From '■'■ L' Art Byzantiti." Par Charles Bayet. Paris, Qtiantin, 1S83.) DEATH OF MANUEL II. 339 succeed. The report of a miraculous vision of the Virgin, who vouchsafed to reveal herself as the defender of the city, encouraged the Greeks to resist with a better spirit than might have been expected. At last the pretender Mustapha, whom Manuel had supplied with money to cause a revolt against his brother, began to stir up such trouble in Asia Minor, that the Sultan determined to raise the siege and march against him. He granted Manuel peace, on the condition that he ceded all his dominions save the cities of Constantinople and Thessalonica and the Peloponnesian province. Thus the empire once more sank back into a state of vassalage to the Ottomans [1422]. Manuel II. died three years after, at the age of seventy-seven. He was the last sovereign of Con- stantinople who won even a transient smile from fortune. The tale of the last thirty years of the empire is one of unredeemed gloom. To Manuel succeeded his son John VI., whose whole reign was passed in peace, without an attempt to shake off the Turkish yoke ; such an attempt indeed would have been hopeless, unless backed by aid from without. As Manuel II. once observed, "the empire now requires a bailiff not a statesman to rule it." Treaties, wars, and alliances were not for him : all that he could do was to try to save a little money, and to keep his walls in good repair, and even these humble tasks were not always feasible. All the descriptions of Constantinople in the fifteenth century, whether written by Greek natives or by Western travellers, bear witness to a state of 340 THE END OF A LONG TALE. exhaustion and debility which make us wonder that the empire did not collapse sooner. The country out- side the walls was a desert. Within them more than half the ground was unoccupied, and covered only by ruins which testified to ancient magnificence. The great palace by the Augustaeum, which sheltered so many generations of emperors, had grown so dilapi- dated that the Paleologi dwelt in a mere corner of it. Part of the porticoes of St. Sophia had fallen down, and the Greeks could not afford to repair even the greatest sanctuary of their faith. The population of the city had shrunk to about a hundred thousand souls, most of them dwelling in great poverty. Such commerce and wealth as still survived in Constanti- nople had passed almost entirely into the hands of the Italians of Genoa and Venice, whose fortified factories at Galata and Pera now contained the bulk of the wares that passed through the city. The military strength of the empire was composed of about four thousand mercenary troops, of whom many were Franks and hardly any were born subjects of the empire. The splendid court, which had once been the wonder of East and West, had shrunk to such modest dimensions that a Burgundian traveller noted with surprise that no more than eight attendants accompanied the empress when she went in state to worship in St. Sophia.^ John VI., in spite of the caution with w^hich he avoided all action, was destined to see the empire lose its most important possession beyond the walls of ' See Bertrandon de la Broquiere quoted in Finlay, vol. iii. p. 493, a very interesting passage. yOHN VI. AT FLORENCE. 341 Constantinople. His brother Andronicus, governor of Thessalonica, traitorously sold that city to the Venetians for 50,000 zecchins. The Sultan, incensed at a transfer of Greek territory having taken place without his permission, pounced down on the place, expelled the Venetians and annexed Thessalonica to the Ottoman Empire [1430]. The chief feature of the reign of the last John Paleologus was his attempt to win aid for the empire by enlisting sympathy in Western Europe. He determined to conform to Roman Catholicism and to throw himself on the generosity of the Pope. Accordingly he betook himself to Italy in 1438, with the Patriarch of Constantinople and many bishops in his train. He appeared at the Councils of Ferrara and Florence, and was solemnly received into the Roman Church in the Florentine Duomo, on July 6, 1439. It had apparently escaped John's notice that Eugenius IV., the pope of his own day, was a very different personage from the great pontiffs of the- eleventh and twelfth centuries, who were able to' depose sovereigns and send forth Crusades at their good pleasure. Since the Great Schism the papacy had been hopelessly discredited in Christendom. Eugenius IV. was engaged in waging a defensive war against the Council of Basle, which was attempt- ing to depose him, and had little thought or power to spend on aiding the Eastern Christians. /\11 that John could get from him was a sum of money and a bod}' of three hundred mercenary troops. This was a poor return for his journey and conversion. Only one thing of importance was accomplished by 342 THE END OF A LONG TALE. the apostasy of the Emperor — the outbreak of a venomous ecclesiastical struggle at Constantinople between the conformists who had taken the oath at Florence, and the bulk of the clergy, who disowned the treaty of union. John was practically boycotted by the majority of his subjects ; the Orthodox priests ceased to pray for him, and the populace refused to enter St. Sophia again, when it had been profaned by the celebration of the Roman Mass. The opinion of the majority of the Greeks was summed up in the exclamation of the Grand-Duke John Notaras — " Better the turban of the Turk in Constantinople than the Pope's Tiara." The last years of the reign of John VI. coincided with the great campaigns of Huniades and Ladislas of Poland against the Turks. For a moment it seemed as if the gallant king of Poland and Hungary, backed by his great Warden of the Marches, might restore the Balkan lands to Christendom. They thrust Murad II. back over the Balkans, and appeared in triumph at Sophia. But the fatal battle of Varna [1444] ended the career of King Ladislas in an untimely death, and after that fight the Ottomans were obviously fated to accomplish their destiny without a check. John Paleologus watched the struggle without movement if not without concern. He was too cautious to stir a finger to aid the Hungarians, for he knew that if he once offended the Sultan his days would be numbered. John VI. passed away in 1448, and Sultan Murad in 145 1. The one was succeeded by his brother Constantine,the last Christian sovereign of Byzantium, MAHOMET II. ATTACKS CONSTANTINOPLE. 343 the Other by his young son Mohammed the Conqueror. Constantine was a Romanist hke his elder brother, and was therefore treated with great suspicion and coolness by his handful of subjects. He was the best man that the house of Paleologus had ever reared, brave, pious, generous, and forgiving. Like King Hosea of Israel, " he did not evil as the kings that were before him," yet was destined to bear the penalty for all the sins and follies of his long line of prede- cessors. Mohammed II., the most commanding personality among the whole race of Ottoman Sultans, set his heart from the first on seizing Constantinople, the natural centre of his empire, and making it his capital. Some excuse had to be found for falling on his vassal : the one that he chose was a rather unwise request which Constantine had made. There dwelt at Constan- tinople a Turkish prince of the royal house named Orkhan, for whom Mohammed paid a considerable subsidy, on condition that he was kept out of the way of mischief and plotting. Someunhappyinspiration im- pelled Constantine to ask for an increase in the subsidy, and to hint that Orkhan had claims to the Sultanate. This was excuse enough for Mohammed : without taking the trouble to declare war he sent out troops and engineers, and began to -erect forts on Greek soil, only four miles away from Constantinople, at the narrowest point of the Bosphorus, so as to block the approach to the city from the Black Sea. The Emperor did not dare to remonstrate, but when the Turks began to pull down a much-venerated church, in order to utilize its stones in the new fort, a few Greeks took 344 '^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^ LONG TALE. arms and drove the masons away. They were at once cut down by the Turkish guards : Constantine demanded redress, and then Mohammed, having fairly picked his wolf-and-lamb quarrel with his un- fortunate vassal, commenced open hostilities [Autumn 1452.] Turkish light troops at once appeared to blockade the city while the Sultan began to collect a great train of cannon at Adrianople, and to build a large fleet of war galleys in the ports of Asia : the siege was to begin in the ensuing spring. The empire was now in its death agony, and Con- stantine recognized the fact. He spent the winter in making frantic appeals to the Pope and the Italian naval powers to save him from destruction. Nicholas V. was willing enough to help ; now that the Emperor was a convert to Catholicism something must be done to aid him. But all that the Pope could send was a cardinal, a moderate sum of money, and a few hundred soldiers of fortune hastily hired in Italy. Venice and Genoa could have done much more, but they had so often heard the cry of "Wolf" raised that they did not realize the danger to their Eastern trade at its true extent. From Genoa, Giovanni Giustiniani brought no more than two galleys and three hundred men. Venice did even less, only commissioning the bailiff of its factory at Galata to arm such able-bodied Venetians as were with him for t'he protection of the city. Altogether the Franks, counting both trained mercenaries and armed burghers, who co-operated in the defence of Constantinople, were not more than three thousand strong. Yet either Genoa or Venice APATHY OF THE GREEKS. 345 could have thrown a hundred galleys and twenty thousand men into the scale if they had chosen. Constantine's own troops were about four thousand strong, but he hoped to recruit them by a general levy of the male population of the city. He issued a passionate appeal to his subjects to join in saving L'ElAlLb OF ST. SOPHIA. the holy city, the centre of Eastern Christendom. But the Greeks only remembered that he was an apostate, who had foresworn the faith of his fathers and done homage to the Pope. They stood aside in sullen apathy, and from the whole population of the city only two thousand volunteers were enlisted. 34^ THE END OF A LONG TALE. Theological bitterness led the blind multitude to cry with Notaras that it preferred the Turk to the Roman, In April, 1453, the young Sultan, with seventy thousand picked troops at his back, laid formal siege to the city on the land side, while a fleet of several hundred war galleys beset the Bosphorus. The end could not be for a moment doubtful ; nine thousand men could not hope to defend the vast circuit of the land and sea-wall against a veteran army urged on by a young and fiery general. Mohammed set his cannon to play on the walls, and it was soon seen that the tough old Roman mortar and stone that had blunted the siege engines of so many foes could not resist the force of gunpowder. The Sultan's artillery was rude, but it was heavy and numerous ; ere long the walls began to come down in flakes, and breaches commenced to show themselves in several places. y>| Constantine Xlii. and his second in command, the Genoese Giustiniani, did all that brave and skilful men might, in protracting the siege. They led sorties, organized attacks by water on the Turkish fleet, and endeavoured to drive off the siege artillery of the enemy by a counter fire of cannon. But it was found that the old walls were too narrow to bear the guns, and where any were hoisted up and brought to bear, their recoil shook the fabric in such a dangerous way that the fire was soon obliged to cease. At sea the Christians won one great success, when four galleys from the Aegean forced their way in through the whole Turkish fleet, and reached the Golden Horn in safety, after sinking many of their assailants. But the Turks had as great a numerical LAST HOURS OF CONSTANTINE XIM. 347 superiority on the water as on land, and the inevit- able could only be delayed. Mohammed even suc- ceeded in getting control of the harbour of the city, above its mouth, by dragging light galleys on rollers over the neck of land between the Bosphorus and the Golden Horn, and launching them in the inland waters just above Galata. Thus the inner, as well as the outer, sea-face of the city was beset by enemies. The end came on May 29, 1453. The Sultan had opened several practicable breaches, of which the chief lay in the north-west angle of the city by the gate of St. Romanus, where two whole towers and the curtain between them had been battered down and choked the ditch. The storm was obviously at hand, and the doomed Emperor was obliged to face his fate. Greek historians dwelt with loving sorrow on the last hours of the unfortunate prince. He left the breach at midnight, partook of the sacrament according to the Latin rite in St. Sophia, and snatched a few hours of troubled sleep in his half-ruined palace. Next morning, with the dawn, he rose to ride back to the post of danger. His ministers and attendants crowded round his horse as he started on what all knew to be his last journey. Looking steadfastly on them he prayed one and all to pardon him for any offence that he might wittingly or unwittingly have committed against any man. The crowd answered with sobs and wails, and with the sounds of woe ringing in his ears Constantine rode slowly off to meet his death. The assault commenced at dawn ; three main attacks and several secondary ones were directed against weak spots in the wall. But the chief stress 348 THE END OF A LONG TALE. was on the great breach b}' the gate of St. Romanus. There the Emperor himself and Giustiniani at his side stood in the midst of the yawning gap with their best men around them, and opposed a barrier of steel to the oncoming assailants. Twelve thousand Janissaries, sabre in hand, formed successive columns of attack ; as soon as one was beaten off another delivered its assault. They fell by hundreds before the swords of the mailed men in the breach, for their felt caps and unarmoured bodies were easy marks for the ponderous weapons of the fifteenth century. But the ranks of the defenders grew thin and weary ; Giustiniani was wounded in the face by an arrow, and taken on board his galley to die. Const antine at last stood almost alone in the breach, and a forlorn hope of Janissaries headed by one Hassan of Ulubad, whom Turkish chroniclers delight to honour, at last forced their way over the wall. The Emperor and his companions were trodden under foot, and the victorious army rushed into the desolate streets of Constantinople, seeking in vain for foes to fight. The Greeks, half expecting that God would interfere to save the queen of Christian cities by a miracle, had crowded into the churches, and were passing the fatal hour in frantic prayer ! The shouts of the victorious enemy soon showed them how the day had gone, and the wor- shippers were dragged out in crowds, to be claimed as slaves and divided among the conquerors. Mohammed II. rode through the breach after his men, and descended into the city, scanning from within the streets that so many Eastern conquerors had in vain desired to see. He bade his men search FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 349 for the Emperor, and the corpse of Constantine was found at last beneath a heap of slain, so gashed and mauled that it was only identified by the golden eagles on his mail shoes. The Turk struck off his head, and sent it round their chief cities as a token of triumph. Riding through the hippodrome towards St. Sophia, Mohammed noted the Delphic tripod with its three snakes,^ standing where Constantine the Great had placed it eleven hundred years before. Either because the menacing heads of the serpents provoked him, or merel}' because he wished to try the strength of his arm, the Sultan rose in his stirrups and smote away the jaws of the nearest snake with one blow of his mace. There was something typical in the deed though Mohammed knew it not. He had defaced the monument of the first great victory of the West over the East. He, the successor in spirit not only of Xerxes but of Chosroes and Moslemah and many another Oriental potentate, who had failed where he succeeded, could not better signalize the end of Greek freedom than by dealing a scornful blow at that ancient memorial, erected in the first days of Grecian greatness, to celebrate the turning back of the Persians on the field of Plataea. At last the Sultan came to St. Sophia, where the crowd of wailing captives was being divided among his soldiery. He rode in at the eastern door, and bade a mollah ascend the pulpit and repeat there the formula of the Moslem faith. So the cry that God was great and Mohammed his prophet rang through ' See pp. 24, 25. 350 THE END OF A LONG TALE. the dome where thirty generations of patriarchs had celebrated the Holy Mysteries, and all Europe and Asia knew the end was come of the longest tale of Empire that Christendom has yet seen. ANGEL OF THE NIGHT. {From "■ V Art Byzantin." Par Charles Bayet. Bart's, Quaniin, iSS^.) ^^ 1 g ^^^ ^ ^^s m ^^ s p^^i ^ ^^ Irfi^^^™ y|j TABLE OF EMPERORS. Arcadius 395-4o8 Theodosius II 408-450 Marcianus 450-457 Leo 1 457-474 Zeno 474-491 Anastasius 1 491-518 JustinusI 518-527 Justinianus 1 527-5^5 Justinus II 565-578 Tiberius II., Constantinus 578-582 Mauricius 582-602 Phocas 602-610 Heraclius 610-641 Heraclius Constantinus and Heracleonas 641-2 Constans II 642-668 Constantine IV 668-685 Justinian II 685-695 Leontius 695-697 Tiberius III., Apsimarus 697-705 Justinian II. (restored) ... 705-711 Philippicus 711-713 Anastasius II., Artemius 713-715 Theodosius III 715-717 Leo III., the Isaurian . 717-740 Constantine V., Coprony- mus 740-775 Leo IV 775-779 Constantine VI 779-797 Irene 797-802 NicephorusI 802-811 Stauracius 81 1 Michael I., Rhangabe ... 811-813 Leo v., the Armenian ... 813-820 Michael II., the Amorian 820-829 Theophihis 829-842 Michael III 842-867 Basil I., the Macedonian... 867-886 Leo VI., the Wise 886-912 Constantine VII., Porphy- rogenitus 912-958 [Co -regent Emperors — Alexander 912-913 Romanus I., Lecape- nus 919-945] Romanus II 958-963 Basil II., Bulgaroktonos 963-1025 [Co-regent Emperors — Nicephorus II., Phocas 963-969 John I., Zimisces ... 969-976] Constantine VIII 1025-28 Romanus III., Argyrus... 1028-34 Michael IV., the Paphla- gonian 1034-42 Michael V IO42 Constantine IX., Mono- machus 1042-55 Theodora 1055-57 Michael VI., Stratioticus 1056-57 Isaac 1., Comnenus 1057-59 352 TABLE OF EMPERORS. Constantine X., Ducas ... 1059-67 -Michael VII., Ducas 1067-78 [Co-regent Emperor — Romanus I\'., Dio- genes I 067-7 I ] Nicephorus III., Botani- ate.s 1078-81 Alexius I., Comnenus... 1081-1118 John II., Comnenus 1118-43 Manuel I., Comnenus 1143-80 Alexius II., Comnenus... 1180-83 Andronicus I., Comnenus 1183-85 Isaac II., Angelus 1185-95 Alexius III., Angelus... 1195-1203 Isaac II. (restored) 1203-4 Alexius v., Ducas 1204 Latin Emperors. Baldwin 1 1204-5 Henry 1205-16 Peter 1217-19 Robert 1219-28 Baldwin II 1228-61 NicAEAN Emperors. Theodore I., Lascaris 1204-22 John III., Ducas 1222-54 Theodore II., Ducas 1254-59 John IV., Ducas 1259-60 Empire Restored. Michael VIII., Paleologus 1260-82 Andronicus II., Paleolo- gus 1 282-1 328 Andronicus III., I'aleolo- gus 1328-41 John v., Paleologus 1341-91 [Co-regent — John VI., Cantacu- zenus 1347-54] Manuel II 1391-1425 John VII 1425-48 Constantine XI 1448-53 INDEX. Abdalmelik, the Caliph, wars of, with Justinian II., 174-6 Al)ul)ekr, the Caliph, wars of, with Heraclius, 160 Achaia, Frank principality of, 296 Acroinon, battle of, 188 Adana, taken by Nicephorus Fhocas, 230 Adrianople, battle of, 40; besieged by the Goths, 41 ; captured by the Turks, 329 Africa, conquered by Belisarius, 84-5 ; overrun by the Saracens, 176 Aijnadin, battle of, 162 Alaric the Cioth, 47 ; wars with Stilicho, 48 ; departs to Italy, 49 Alaeddin, Sultan of the Seljouks, 322 Alboin the Lombard invades and conquers Italy, 1 16 Aleppo, Emirate of, 227 ; attacked by Nicephorus Phocas, 231 ; tributary to the empire, 270 Alexander, emperor-regent, 217 Alexandria, stormed by the Arabs, 166 Alexius I. (Comnenus), usurpation of, 257 ; wars with the Normans, 239 ; conquests of in Asia Minor, 2(35 ; commercial policy of, 268 Alexius II. (Comnenus), short reign and murder of, 272 Alexius III. (Angelus), usurpation of, 278 ; attacked by the Crusaders, 282 ; flies, 284 Alexius IV. (Angelus), takes refuge in Germany, 279; persuades the Crusaders, 280 ; made emperor, 284 ; murdered, 285 Alexius V. (Ducas), murders Alexius IV., 285 ; defends Con- stantinople, 287 ; slain, 293 Alexius Comnenus, emperor of Trebizond, 298 Alp Arslan, Sultan of the Seljouk Turks, attacks the empire, 252 ; defeats Romanus IV., 254 J Amalasuntha, Gothic queen, I murdered, 82 Amalphi, commerce of, 225 Amorium, stormed by the Sara- cens, 210 Amour, Turkish Emir. 327 Amrou conquers Egypt, 166 Anastasius I., reign of, 61 Anastasius II., usurpation of, 181 Anatolic theme, 167 Andreas murders Constans II., 169 Andronicus I. (Comnenus), crmies and fall of, 272-3 Andronicus II. (Paleologus), reign of, 315-20 Andronicus III. (Paleologus), reign of, 32 1 -2 Angelus, house of, see Isaac II. Alexius III. and Theodore of Epirus 354 INDEX. Angora, battle of, 334 Ani, taken by the Turks, 251 Antheniius, prime minister of Theodosius II., 54-5 Anthemius, architect of St. Sophia, 107 Anne of Savoy, empress-regent, 326 Antioch, taken by the Persians, 99; taken a second time, 129; stormed by the Saracens, 163 ; retaken Ijy Nicephorus Phocas, 231; lost to the Turks, 256; besieged by the Crusaders, 265 ; tributary to the Comneni, 270 Antioch-on-jNIaeander, battle of, 299 Antonina, wife of Relisarius, 74 Apsimarus, Tiberius, emperor, 177 ; executed, 179 Arabs, see Saracens Arcadius, reign of, 47-54 ; his dealings with the Goths, 48 ; quarrels with Chrysostom, 52 Armenia, conquered by the By- zantines, 243 ; overrun by the Turks, 251 Army, reformed by Leo and Zeno, 61 ; description of, in tenth century, 218 Artemiiis Anastasius, reign of, 61 Art, decay and revival of, 222-4 Aspar, executed by Leo L, 60 Athalaric, Gothic king, 81 Athanarich, Gothic king, 42 ; visits Constantinople, 44 Athens, early Byzantines at war with, 6 ; schools of, closed by Justinian, 150 ; Frank duchy of, 297 ; conquered by the " Grand Company," 319 Attila, king of the Huns, wars of with the empire, 57 Augustaeum, description of the, Avars, invasions of, the 122 ; war of, with Heraclius, 134 ; besiege Constantinople, 137 B Baanes, rebel in Syria, 163 Baduila, Gothic king, victories of, 92 ; takes Rome, 94 ; slain in battle, 95 Baldwin L, emperor, his cha- racter, 281 ; crowned, 292 ; slain by the Bulgarians, 295 Baldwin IL, reign of, 301 ; his travels, 305 ; expelled from Constantinople, 306 Bardas Caesar, 212 ; murdered by Michael IIL, 213 Bari, taken by the Normans, 259 Basil I., made Caesar, 213; as- sassinates Michael IIL, 213; laws of, 214 Basil 1 1., ascends the throne, 229 ; assumes the full power, 240 ; his Bulgarian victories, 241-3 ; cam- paigns in Asia, 243 ; dies, 244 Bayezid, Turkish Suhan, 334 Belisarius, Persian victories of, 73 ; quells the Nika riois, 79 ; con- quers Africa, 84 ; takes Palermo, 88 ; takes Rome, 89 ; takes Ravenna, 91 ; recalled, 92; acts against Persia, 100 ; defeats the Huns, 104 ; disgraced, 105 Beneventum, Lombard duchy of, 117; wars of with Constans II., 169 Black Sea, Greek trade with, 2 " Blues and Green'^," Circus factions, 22, 75 ; great riot of, against Justinian, 76-7 ; armed by Maurice, 127 Bohemund the Norman, wars of with Alexius I., 267 Boniface of Montferrat, 281-2; made king of Thessalonica, 292 ; slain in battle, 296 Bosphorus, the, 1-2 Bostra, stormed by the Saracens, 162 Branas, Alexius, rebellion of, 277 Biienne, house of, at Athens, 308 ; expelled by the " Grand Company," 319 Broussa, see Prusa Bucellarian Theme, 167-8 Buhawides, Persian dynasty, 226-7 Bulgarians, invade and settle in INDEX. 355 Moesia, 171; defeated by Jus- tinian II., 173; aid Justinian, 179 ; defeat the Saracens, 187 ; at war with Constantine V., 196 ; defeat Constantine VI., 198 ; slay Nicephorus I., 203 ; besiege Constantinople, 204 ; routed by Leo V., 205 ; defeat Leo VI., 216 ; conquered by the Russians, 235 ; conquered by Basil II., 241-3 ; revolt against Isaac 1 1., 276-7 ; slay Baldwin I., 295 ; conquests of, 308 ; subdued by the Turks, 330 Burtzes storms Antioch, 231 Byzantium, founded, I ; early hist(Dry of, 2-8 ; under the Romans, 9-12; chosen as Con- stantine's capital, ly ; see after- wards tinder Constantinople Candia taken by Nicephorus Pho- cas, 228 Cantacuzenus, John, usurpation of, 325-8 Caracalla, grants privileges to By- zantium, 10 Carthage, taken by Belisarius, 85 ; taken by the Saracens, 176 Cassiodorus, his work in literary copying, 149 Chalcedon, founded, 3 ; taken by the Persians, 134 Champlitte, William of, founds principality of Achaia, 296 Charles the Great crowned em- peror, 199 Cherson, Justinian II. at, 177 ; sacked, 180 Chosroes I., king of Persia, wars of, with Justinian, 72-4, 90-100 Chosroes H., wars with Phocas and Heraclius, 129-135 ; death of, 138 Chosroantiocheia, foundation of, 72 . Christianity, influence of, on the empire and society, 145-149 Chrysostom, see under ^c^xv Chry- sostom Cilicia, conquered by Nicephorus Phocas, 230 ; lost to the Turks, 236 ; reconquered by the Com- neni, 270 Column, of the Hippodrome, 25 ; of Constantine, 25 Commerce, centralization of, at Constantinople, 224, 225 ; de- cline of, under the Comneni, 267 ; effects of Fourth Crusade on, 310 Comnena, Anna, writes her father's life, 264 Comnenus, see under Alexius, John, Andronicus, Manuel, David, Isaac Conrad of Montferrat defeats Branas, 277 Constans II., reign of, 166; wars of with the Saracens, 167 ; murdered, 169 Constantine I., besieges Byzan- tium, 12 ; master of the world, 14 ; seeks a capital, 16 ; founds Constantinople, 18 Constantine III., defeated by the Saracens, 164 ; short reign of, 165 Constantine IV. (Pogonatus), wars of with the Saracens, 170; defeats Moawiah, 171 ; holds the Council of Constantinople, 172 Constantine V. (Copronymus), wars of, 196 ; persecutes the Image-worshippers, 197 Constantine VI., reign of, 198 ; blinded by his mother, 198 Constantine VII. (Porphyrogeni- tus), reign of, 216, 217 ; literary works of, 220, 221 Constantine VIII., reign of, 245 Constantine IX. (Monomachus), reign of, 247 Constantine X. (Ducas), reign of, 250, 251 Constantine XI. (Paleologus), ac- cession of, 343 ; attacked by the Turks, 344 ; last hours of, 347 ; death of, 348 Constantinople founded by Con- 350 INDEX. !tlA' ,4^r! stantine, i8 ; topography of, iq-29 ; besieged by the Goths, 41 ; street fighting in, 51; be- sieged by Avars and Persians, 136, 137 ; besieged for the first time by the Saracens, 170 ; be- sieged for tlie second time by the Saracens, 185, 1S6; besieged by Bulgarians, 205 ; commercial importance of, 224 ; riots in, 247 ; the Crusaders at, 264 ; taken by the Franks and \'ene- tians, 284 ; stormed and sacked a second time, 287, 288 ; devas- tation of, by the Latins, 291 ; besieged by John Ducas, 301 ; recovered by the Greeks, 305 ; taken by John Paleologus, 329 ; besieged by Murad II., 337 ; last siege of, 346 ; taken by the Turks, 348 Corippus, poem of, 144 Council of Constantinople, under Constantine IV., 172 ; under Con-tantine V., 197 ; imder Leo v., 206 CouncilofFlorence,JohnVI.at,34i Courtenay, house of at Constanti- nople, 300, 301 Crete, conquered by the Saracens, 208 ; recovered by Nicephorus Phocas, 228 ; taken by the Venetians, 292 Cros-, the Holy, captured by the Persians, 132 ; recovered by Heraclius, 139 ; removed to Constantinople, 163 Crumn, king of Bulgaria, defeats Nicephorus I. , 203 ; besieges Constantinople, 205 Crusaders, their dealings with Alexius I. , 263, 264; enter Syria, 265 ; of the Fourth Cru- sade, 279 ; conquer Constanti- nople, 288 Ctesiphon, Heraclius at, 138 Cyprus, monks banished to, 197 ; recovered by Nicephorus Pho- cas, 230 ; seized by Isaac Com- nenus, 277 ; taken by Richard L of England, 278 D Damascus, taken by the Persians, 131 ; taken by the Saracens, 163 Dandolo, Henry, doge of Venice, 280, 281 ; at the storm of Con- stantinople, 284, 288 Dara taken in the Persian wars, 136 Dastagerd taken by Heraclius, 138 David Comnenus defeated by Theodore I., 299 Delphic tripod, the, 24 ; muti- lated by Mahomet II., 349 Delphic oracle, the. orders foun- dation of Byzantium, 3 Digenes Akritas, epic of, 222 Diocletian makes Nicomedia his capital, 15 Diogenes, Romanus, reign of, 251 ; defeated at at Manzikert, 254 ; slain, 256 Ducas, see binder Constantine X., Michael VII., John III., Theo- dore II. Durazzo, battle of, 260 Dushan, .Stephen, king of Servia, conquests of, 327 Ecloga, the, Leo III.'s code of laws, 194 Eesa, Sultan, 334-5 Eg}'pt, conquered by the Persians, 134; conquered by the .Sara- cens, 164 ; separated from the Caliphate, 227 Eikasia, story of, 21 1 Emesa, taken by the Saracens, 163 ; taken by Nicephorus Pho- cas, 231 Epirus, the despotateof, 298, 301, 304, 327 Eitogrul, the Turk, 322 Eudocia (Athenais), wife of Theo- dosius II., her disgrace, 56 Eudocia, wife of Romanus Dio- genes, 251 Eudoxia, ^lia, wifeof Arcadius,52 INDEX. 357 Eugenius IV., pope, treaty of, with John VI., 341 Euphrosyne, wife of Michael the Amorian, 207 Eutropius, minister of Arcadius, 47 ; protected by Chrysostom, 50 Euphemius, rebel in Sicily, 208 Exarchate, of Ravenna, 119 ; conquered by the Lombards, 196 Fatimite dynasty in Egypt, 243 Ferrara, John VI. at Council of, 341 Flaccilla, benevolence of, 1156 Florence, Council of, 341 Franks, threaten Italy, 89 ; sum- moned by Witiges, 91 ; protect the Papacy, 196 Fritigern, Gothic ruler, 35-7 ; vic- tory of over Valens, 40 Fravitta defeats Gainas, 51 Gainas, minister of Arcadius, 47 ; rebellion of, 50; slain, 51 Gallienus, Byzantium destroyed by, 10 Gallipoli seized by the Turks, 329 Ganzaca burnt by Heraclius, 136 Gelimer, king of the Vandals, 81 ; defeated and captured, 85 Genoa, rise of, 263 ; trade of, with the East, 267 ; allied to Michael Paleologus, 314 ; sends aid to Constantine XI. , 344 George the Alan, 318 George of Pisidia, poems of, 221 Giustiniani, John, defends Con- stantinople, 344-8 Godfrey of Bouillon, 264 Goths, early history of, 32 ; cross the Danube, 37 ; defeat Valens, 39 ; besiege Constantinople, 41 ; submit to Theodosius, 42 ; the Visigoths under Alaric, 48 ; quit the East, 49 ; the Ostrogoths under Theodoric at war with Zeno, 62 ; invade Italy, 64 ; kingdom of, attacked by Beli- sarius, 86 ; wars of, with Jus- tinian, 88-94 ; defeated and destroyed, 95 " Grand Company," the, hired by Andronicus II., 317; ravage Thrace, 318 ; conquer Athens, 319 Greece, invaded by the Goths, 48 ; overrun by the Slavs, 125 ; conquered by the Crusaders, 296, 297 Greek fire, invented, 170 ; used by the Byzantine fleet, 220 Gregory the Great, Pope, 120, 121 Guiscard, Robert, wars of, with Ale.xius I., 259-61 H Haroun-al-Raschid, wars of, with Nicephorus I., 203 Helena, mother of Constantine I., 19 Hellas, theme of, 168 ; revolts against Leo III., 193 Henry of Flanders, Emperor, 295-6 Henry VI. of Swabia, Emperor of the West, 278 Ileracleonas, reign and fall of, 165-6 Heraclius the Elder, rebellion of, 130 Heraclius I., sails against Constan- tinople, 130; slays Phocas, 130; disasters of the Persian War, 132 ; his Crusade, 133 ; victorious campaign of, 135-7 ; his triumph, 139 ; attacked by the Saracens, 160 ; defeated, 163 ; last years of, 164 Heraclius Constantinus, son of Heraclius I., short reign of, 16S Hierapolis taken by Nicephorus Phocas, 231 Hieromax, battle of the, 162 HilJeric, Vandal king, deposed, 81 Hippodrome, the great, 22 35« INDEX. Histiaeus holds Byzantium, 5 Honorius slays Stilicho, 49 Hungary, converted to Christianity, 262 ; invaded by Manuel I ., 27 1 ; attacks the Ottoman Turks, 342 Huniades, John, 342 Huns, under Attila, 57 ; ravage Syria, 71 ; threaten Constanti- nople, 104; defeated by Beli- sarius, 105 I Iconium, Sultanate of, see under Seljouks Iconoclasm,the movement, 188-9; vigorous under the Isaurian emperors, 192-7; in the ninth century, 203-10 ; ended by Michael HI., 212 Iconodules, 202 Images, superstitions connected with, 190; removed by Leo ni., 192 ; use of, ceases in the East, 212 Innocent III., sends out Fourth Crusade, 281 ; wrath of with the Crusaders, 290 Irene, the empress, regency of, 197 ; deposed, 198 ; blinds her son and seizes the throne, 199 Isaac I. (Comnenus), his short reign, 250 Isaac II. (Angelus), rebels, 273 ; his reign, 276 ; deposed by his brother, 278 ; restored, 284; dies, 285 Isaac Comnenus, of Cyprus, 277-8 Isauiians, the, enlisted by Leo and Zeno, 61 ; dynasty of the, 192-9 Isperich, king of Bulgaria, 172 Italy, conquered by Belisarius, 88-91 ; partly conquered by the Lombards, 1 16 ; Constans II. in, 169 ; central parts of, lost, 196 ; southern parts of, conquered by the Normans, 258 J Jacobites, in Egypt and Syria, 161 Janissaries, the, 324 Jerusalem, Eudocia at, 57 ; taken by Persians, 132; Heraclius at, 139; taken by the Saracens, 163; taken by the Crusaders, 265 John I. (Zimisces), murders his uncle, 232 ; successful wars of, 234-7 ; dies, 239 John II. (Comnenus), reign and conquests of, 268-9 John III. (Ducas Vatatzes), 300; conquers Thrace and Macedonia, 301 John IV. (Ducas), dethroned by Michael Paleologus, 304 John V (Paleologus), minority of, 325-8 ; expels John Cantacu- zenus, 329 ; defeated l;y the Turks, 330 ; later years of, 333 John VI. (Paleologus), reign of, 339 ; embraces Catholicism, 341 John (Angelus), Emperor of Thes- salonica, 300 John, King of Bulgaria, 276 ; con- quers Baldwin I., 295 John the Cappadocian, finance minister, 76 John Chrysostom, patriarch, 52 ; exiled, 53 John Ducas, regent, 255 John the Faster, patriarch, 120 John the Grammarian, patriarch, 209, 212 John Huniades, general, 342 John Lydus, author, 143 Julian, reign of, 32 Justin I., reign of, 65 Justin II., reign and wars of, 117 Justinian I., character of, 65 ; marries Theodora, 66 ; first Per- sian war of, 71-4; Italian and African wars of, 83-93 '> recalls Belisarius, 91 ; his buildings, 106-9 ; his legal work, 1 12 Justinian II., misfortunes o'', 172; banished, 175 ; reconquers his throne, 179 ; slain, 180 K Kadesia, l)attle of, 164 Kaikhosru, Sultan, slain in battle, 299 INDEX. 359 Karasi, Emirs of, 319 Karl the Great, crowned emperor, 201 Kathisma, the, 24 Khaled, victories of, 162 Khazars, allied to Heraclius, 137; shelter Justinian II., 178 Kief, Russian capital, 234 Kobad, wars of, with Justinian, 71 Ladislas, king of Bulgaria, 243 Ladislas, king of Poland and Hungary, 342 Larissa, battle of, 261 Lascaris, see tinder Theodore I. Latin language, used in the Balkan Peninsula, 124; decay of the, 144 Law, Roman, codified by Justmian, 112 ; changes of Leo III., 194 ; of Basil I., 214 Lazarus the painter, 224 Leckv, Mr., views of, discussed, 153 . . . Lazica, wars of Justinian and Chosroes about, 100 Leo I., reign of, 60 Leo III., the Isaurian, seizes the crown, 182 ; defends Constanti- nople, 184 ; religious reforms of, 192 ; political reforms of, 194 Leo IV., short reign of, 197 Leo V. (the Armenian) seizes the throne, 204 ; defeats the Bulgarians, 205 ; murdered, 206 Leo VI. (the Wise), reign of, 216; literary works of, 218 Leo the Deacon, 237 Leontius, usurpation and fall of, 175-7 ; slain, 179 Liberius conquers South Spain, 96-7 Licinius, wars of with Maximinus Daza, II ; dethroned by Con- stantine I., 12 Literature, 221-2 Lombards, the, leave Pannonia, 115 ; conquer North Italy, I17 ; defeated by Constans II., 169; subdue the Exarchate, 196 Louis IX., of France, gives money to Baldwin II., 305 Lupicinus, governor of Moesia, 37 Lydus, John, author, 143 M Macedonia, overrun by Slavs, 125 ; in hands of Boniface of Montferrat, 292 ; conquered by Stephen Dushan, 327 Maeander, battle of the, 299 Mahomet, the prophet, rise of, 159 Mahomet I., Sultan, reunites the Ottoman Empire, 336 Mahomet II. conquers Constanti- nople, 343-50 Maniakes, wars of, 246 Manuel I. (Comnenus), reign and wars of, 271-2 Manuel II. (Paleologus), reign and misfortunes of, 336-9 Manzikert, battle of, 254 Marcianus, reign of, 59 Martina, niece and wife of Hera- clius, 165 ; exiled, 166 Martyropolis, 121 Maurice, reign of, 120; Persian wars, 121 ; fall and death of, 127 Maximinus Daza takes Byzantium, II Melek-Adel, Sultan of Eg}'pt, 279 Mesembria, taken by Bulgarians, 204 ; battle of, 205 Mesopotamia, conquered by He- raclius, 136; invaded by John Zimisces, 239 Michael I. (Rliangabe), short reign of, 204 Michael II. (the Amorian), con- spiracy of, 2'; 6 ; ecclesiastical policy of, 207 ; w-ars of, 208 Michael III. (the Drunkard), minority of, 212 ; excesses and murder of, 213 Michael IV. (the Paphlagonian), reign and w ars of, 246 Michael V., ephemeral power of, 247 360 INDEX. Michael VI. (Stratioticus), short reign of, 248-9 Michael VII. (Uucas), minority of, 251 ; disastrous reign of, 256 Michael VIII. (Paleologus), usur- pation of, 303-4 ; overthrows the Latin Empire, 305 ; disbands the Asiatic militia, 313 ; wars of, 304, 314 Michael IX., son and colleague of Andronicus II., defeated by the " Grand Company," 318 Michael Angelus, despot of Epirus, 300 Moawiah, Caliph, attacks Con- stantinople, 170 ; his armies de- feated, 171 Moesia, invaded by the Goths, 37 ; seized by the Bulgarians, 17 1 Monks, characteristics of the early, 149 ; favour image worship, 193 ; persecuted by Constantine Co- pronymus, 197 Monophysites, 75 Moors, Gelimer flies to the, 85 Montferrat, see under Boniface and Conrad Morals, effect of Christianity on, 145-7, general character of Byzantine, I55~^ Moslemah besieges Constanti- nople, 185-7 Motassem, the Caliph, sacks Amorium, 210 Murad I., conquers Thrace, 329; suzerain of John V., 330; con- quers the Serbs, 332 Murad II., besieges Constanti- nople, 337 ; makes peace with Manuel II., 338; wars of, 342 Murtzuphlus, see Alexius V. (Ducasj Myriokephalon, battle of, 272 N Naissus, birthplace of Constantine I., 16; taken by the Bulgarians, 277 Naples, taken by Belisarius, 88 ; interference of the Pope with, 120 Narses, the eunuch, conquers Italy from the Goths, 95 Narses, General, l)unit alive by Phocas, 129 Navy, the Byzantine, 219-20 Nicaea, taken by the Crusaders, 264, by the Ottomans, 323 Nicephorus I. dethrones Irene, 199 ; disastrous wars of, 203 Nicephorus II., Phocas, takes Candia, 228 ; emperor, 229 ; wars of, 231 ; murdered by Zimisces, 232 Nicholas V., pope, sends aid to Constantine XI., 344 Nicomedia, taken by the Otto- mans, 323 Nineveh, battle of, 138 Normans, conquer Byzantine Italy, 247 ; invade the empire, 259 ; second invasion of repelled, 267; third invasion of, 273 Notaras, John, 342 Nuceria, Goths beaten at, 95 O Obeydah, Saracen general, 162 Obsequian theme, the, 168 Odoacer, conquered by Theodoric, 63,64 Omar, the Caliph, visits Jerusalem, 163 Omeyades, dynasty of the, 170 Orkhan, Emir of the Ottomans, reign and successes of, 323-4 ; Pretender to the Sultanate, 343 Orosius, history of, 150 Ostrogoths, under Theodoric in Moesia, 62 ; conquer Italy, 64; weakness of the kingdom of, 82 ; attacked by Justinian, 88 ; wars of with Belisarius and Narses, 89-94 ; crushed, 95 Othman, Emir of the Turks, con- quests of, 321-23 Palace, imperial, at Constanti- nople, 19 INDEX. 361 Paleologus, house of, see under Michael VI., Andronicus II. and III., John V. and VI., Constantine XI. Palermo, taken by Belisarius, 88 Palestine, conquered by the Per- sians, 132 ; overrun by the Arabs, 163 ; subdued by the Crusaders, 265 Pandects, compiled by Justinian, 112 Patriarchal palace of Constanti- nople, 21 Patriarchs, see tmder John, Ser- gius, &c. Paulicians, sect of the persecuted by Basil I., 214 Paulinus, put to death by Theo- dosius II., 57 Patzinak Tartars, the, 237 ; wars of with Alexius I., 262 Pavia, taken by the Lombards, 1 16 Persian Empire destroyed by the Arabs, 164 Persian Wars under Julian, 32 ; under Justinian, 71, 99 ; under Maurice, 121 ; under Phocas and Heraclius, 130-36 Peter, general under Nicephorus Phocas, 231 Philip of Macedon, attacks Byzan- tium, 7 Philip of Swabia, helps Alexius Angelus the younger, 279-8 Philippicus, usurpation and fall of, 1 80- 1 Phocas, emperor, his usurpation, 127 ; cruelty of, 129 ; slain, 130 Phocas, Bardas, rebels against John Zimisces, 233 ; against Basil II., 241 Phocas, Nicephorus, reign of, 228- 30; wars of, 231 ; murdered, Photius, patriarch, his learning, 221 Plague, the great of a.d. 542, loi Popes, rise of the power of, 120 ; estranged from the empire, 196 ; call in the Franks, 199 Priscus, general of Maurice, 126 Prusa, taken by the Turks, 323 ; sacked by the Mongols, 334 Piilcheria, Empress, with her Inother Theodosius II., 55 ; marries INIarcianus, 59 Pelekanon, battle of, 323 Polyeuctus, patriarch, 230 R . Ravenna, taken by Belisarius, 91 ; exarchate of, 1 19; occupied by the Lombards, 196 Rhangabe, Michael, short reign of, 204 Rhazates, general, slain by Hera- clius, 137 Richard Coeur de Leon, conquers Cyprus, 278 Robert Guiscard, wars of with Alexius I., 259-60 ; final re- pulse of, 261 Roger de Flor, hired by Androni- cus II., 317 ; conquests of, 318; assassinated, 318 Romanus I. (Lecapenus), long re- gency of, 217 Romanus II., short reign of, 228-9 Romanus III. (Argyrus), married to Zoe, 245 ; dies, 246 Romaims IV. (Diogenes), reign of, 251 ; defeated by Turks, 254 ; dies, 256 Rome, taken by Belisarius, 89 ; besieged by the Goths, 90 ; taken by Baduila, 94 ; Gregory the Great at, 120; Constans II. at, 169 ; Charles the Great at, 199 Ruric, founds the Russian king- dom, 234 Russians, early invasions of, 216 ; attack Bulgaria, 234 ; defeated by John Zimisces, 237 ; con- verted to Christianity, 239 S Sabatius, father of Justinian, 65 Samuel, king of Bulgaria, 241 ; wars and death of, 242 Saoudji, rebels against Murad I., 333 362 INDEX. Sapor, king of Persia, 32 Saracens, the, converted by Ma- homet, 159 ; mvade Syria, 160-2 ; conquer Eg)^pt, 166 ; conquer Persia, 164; civil wars of the, 166 ; for later history, see tmder names of the Caliphs Sardis, taken by Alexius I., 265 Scholarian Guards, the, 104 Seljouk Turks, conquer Persia and Armenia, 250-1 ; invade the em- pire, 252 ; conquer Asia Minor, 254 ; defeated by the Crusaders, 265 ; wars of with the Com- neni, 265-7-72 ; with Theo- dore I., 298 Sergius, patriarch, 133 Senate House at Constantinople, 21 Servians, cross the Danube, 123 ; conquered by Basil II., 243; rebel against Michael IV., 246 ; conquered by Manuel I., 271 ; overrun Macedonia, 327 ; sub- dued by the Turks, 330 Severus, emperor, takes Byzan- tium, 9 Shahrbarz, the Persian, takes Jerusalem, 132 ; defeated by Heraclius, 135 Sicily, conquered by Belisarius, 88 ; invaded by Saracens, 208 ; finally conquered by Saracens, 214; invaded by Maniakes, 246 Siroes, deposes his father Chos- roes, 138 Skleros, Bardas, rebel against Basil II., 241 Slavery, influence of Christianity on, 147-8 Slavs, invade the Balkan Penin- sula, 123 ; subject to the Avars, 124-37 ; ravages of the, 125, 129; made tributary by Con- stans II., 169 ; besiege Thessa- lonica, 171 Sophia, St., first building of, 27 ; burnt in 410 A.D., 53 ; burnt in the Nika riots, 77 ; rebuilding of by Justinian, 107-9 ; dese- crated by the Turks, 349 Spain, South of, conquered by Jus- tinian's generals, 96-7 Stauracius, emperor, short reign of, 204 Statues at Constantinople, 21, 25 ; destruction of by the Crusaders, 291 Suleiman, Saracen vizier, besieges Constantinople, 185 ; dies, 186; Turkish Sultan, reign of, 334-6 Stephen Lecapenus, usurpation of, 217 Stephen Dushan, king of Servia, conquests of, 327 Stephen, pope, calls in the Franks, 196 Stilicho, wars of with Alaric,47-8 ; murdered by Honorius, 49 Swiatoslaf, king of Russia, con- quers Bulgaria, 235 ; defeated by Zimisces, 237 Syria, invaded by the Huns, 71 ; invaded by Kobad, 73 ; con- quered by Shahrbarz, 129-30 ; invaded and conquered by the Saracens, 162-3 ! conquests of Nicephorus Phocas in, 229; subdued by the Crusaders, 265 Sophronius, patriarch of Jerusa- lem, 163 T Tagina, battle of, 95 Tarsus, taken by Nicephorus Pho- cas, 230 Teia, Gothic king, slain in battle, Telemachus, martyrdom of, 145 Terbel, king of Bulgaria, aids Jus- tinian II., 178 Themes, institution of the pro- vincial system of, 1 67-8 Theodahat, Gothic king, murders his wife, 82 ; war of with Jus- tinian, 87 ; slain, 88 Theodora, wife of Justinian, career of, 66-8 ; in the Niha riots, 79 ; death of, 103 Theodora, wife of Theophilus, 21 1; regency of, 212 Theodora, daughter of Constantine VIII., reign of, 248 INDEX. 363 Theodora, daughter of Canta- cuzenus, married to Orkhan, 328 Theodore I. (Lascaris), at the siege of Constantinople, 289 ; made emperor at Nicaea, 298 ; wars of, 299 Theodore II. (Ducas), short reign of, 303 Theodore, Studita, 221 Theodoric, son of Triariiis, wars of with Zeno, 62-3 Theodoric, son of Theodemir, re- bels against Zeno, 62 ; conquers Italy, 64 ; dies, 81 Theodotus.minister of Justinian II., 174 Theodosius I., wars of, with the Goths, 42 ; dies, 44 Theodosius II., reign of, 54-6 ; war with Attila, 57 Theodosius III., usurpation of, 181 ; abdicates, 183 Theophano, empress, 229; murders her husband, 233 Theophilus, emperor, reign and wars of, 208-11 ; his love of art, 224-5 Theophilus, patriarch of Alex- andria, 52 Thessalonica, besieged by the Slavs, 171 ; stormed by the Saracens, 216 ; Crusading king- dom of, 292 ; retaken by the Greeks, 296 ; taken by the Turks, 330 ; recovered, 336 ; finally lost, 341 Theuderic, Prankish king, attacks Witiges, 89 Thomas, rebel in Asia, 208 Tiberius- II. , Constantinus, short reign of, 114 ; wars of, 1 17 T'iberius III., Apsimarus, re- bellion of, 177; deposed and slain, 179 Tiberius, son of Justinian II., slain, 180 Togrul Beg, Turkish chief, con- quers Bagdad, 251 Totila, see under Baduila Trebizond, empire of, founded, 298 Tribonian, minister of Justinian I., 112 Tricameron, battle of, 85 Turks, see under Seljouks, and names of Ottoman Sultans Tuscany, conquered by the Lom- bards, 116 Tyana, sacked by Saracens, 182 U Uldes, king of the Huns, 51 Urosh, king of Servia, 327 Uscup, capital of Stephen Dushan, 327 V Valens, reign of, 36 ; slain in battle by the Goths, 41 Vandals, kingdom of the, in Africa, 82 ; conquered by Be- lisarius, 85 Varangian guards, 239 ; at Du- razzo, 260 ; at siege of Con- stantinople, 282, 288 Verona, Baduila at, 92 Venice, rise of, 225 ; commercial treaties of, with Alexius I., 268; wars with Manuel I., 271 ; aids the Fourth Crusade, 279 ; en- gages in war with Alexius III., 282 ; share of in plunder of Constantinople, 292 ; at war with Michael VIII.. 314 Vigilius, pope, persecuted by Jus- tinian, 103 Vikings, the, in Russia, 234 Visigoths, the, invade Moesia, 35 ; slay Valens, 41 ; under Alaric, 48 ; migrate to Italy, 49 Vitalian, rebellion of, 61 W Welid, caliph, wars of, with the empire, 182 Witiges, Gothic king, 88 ; be- sieges Rome, 90 ; submits to Belisarius, 91 Y Yezid, Saracen prince, wars of with the empire, 170 3^4 INDEX. Zachariah, patriarch of Jerusalem, 132 Zapetra, taken by Theophilus, 210 Zara, taken by tlie Crusaders, 280 Zeno, emperor, reorganizes the army, 61 ; wars of with the Goths, 62 ; sends Theodoric to Italy, 64 Zeuxippus, baths of, 19 Zimisces, John, murder^; Nice- phorus i., 233; Russian war of, 235-7 ; Asiatic conquests of, 239 Zoe, empress, her marriages and reign, 245-7 XLbc Stor^ of tbe Bations. Messrs. G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS take pleasure in announcing that they have in course of publication, in co-operation with Mr. T. Fisher Unvvin, of London, a series of historical studies, intended to present in a graphic manner the stories of the different nations that have attained prominence in history. In the story form the current of each national life is distinctly indicated, and its picturesque and noteworthy periods and episodes are presented for the reader in their philosophical relation to each other as well as to universal history. It is the plan of the writers of the different volumes to enter into the real life of the peoples, and to bring them before the reader as they actually lived, labored, and struggled — as they studied and wrote, and as they amused themselves. In carrying out this plan, the myths, with which the history of all lands begins, will not be over- looked, though these will be carefully distinguished from the actual history, so far as the labors of the accepted historical authorities have resulted in definite conclusions. The subjects of the different volumes have been planned to cover connecting and, as far as possible, consecutive epochs or periods, so that the set when completed will present in a comprehensive narrative the chief events in the great Storv of THE NATIONS; but it is, of course not always practicable to issue the several volumes in their chronological order. The "Stories" are printed in good readable type, and in handsome i2mo form. They are adequately illustrated and furnished with maps and indexes. Price, per vol., cloth, $1.50. Half morocco, gilt top, $1.75. The following volumes are now ready (November, 1891): THE STORY OF GREECE. Prof. Jas. A. Harrison. '■ " " ROME. Arthur Oilman. '* THE JEWS. Prof. James K. Hosmer. " CHALDEA. Z. a, Ragozin. " " " GERMANY. S. Barinc-Gould, " " " NORWAY. Hjalmar H. Boyesen. ♦' " " SPAIN. Rev. E. E. and Susan Hale. " HUNGARY. Prof. A. VAmbery. " CARTHAGE. Prof. Alfred ]. Church. " THE SARACENS. Arthur Oilman. " THE MOORS IN SPAIN. Stanley Lane-Poole " " " THE NORMANS. Sarah Orne Jewett. " PERSIA. S. G. W. Benjamin. " ANCIENT EGYPT. Prof. Geo. Rawlinson. " ALEXANDER'S EMPIRE. Prof. T- P- Mahaffy. " ASSYRIA. Z. A. Ra(;ozin. " THE GOTHS. Henry Bradley. " " " IRELAND. Hon. Emily Lawless. " " " TURKEY. Stanley Lane-Poole. •' " " MEDIA, BABYLON, AND PERSIA. Z. A. Ragozin " MEDLfiVAL FRANCE. Prof. Gustav Masson. *' " " HOLLAND. Prof. J. Thorold Rogers. " MEXICO. Susan Hale. " " " PPICENICIA. Prof. Geo. Rawlinson. " THE HANSA TOWNS. Helen Zimmern. " " " EARLY BRITAIN. Prof. Alfred J. Church. •• " " THE BARBARY CORSAIRS. Stanley Lane-Poole, " RUSSIA. W. R. Morfill. «« «« " THE TEWS UNDER ROME. W. D. Morrison. " " " SCOTL.VND. John Mackintosh. " SWITZERLAND. R. Stead and Mrs. Arnold Hue. " PORTUGAL. H. Morse-Stei'HENs. 32) " " " THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE. C. W. C. Oman. Now in press for immediate issue : Z^\-' THE STORY OF SICILY. E. A. Freeman. " VEDIC INDIA. Z. A. Ragozin. " THE THIRTEEN COLONIES. Helen A. Smith. " WALES AND CORNW.\LL. Owen M. Edwards. " CANADA. A. R. M.\cfarlane. G P. PUTNAM'S SONS T. FISHER UNWIN New York London 35 1' IDeroes of tbe Bations. EDITED BY EVELYN ABBOTT M.A., Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford. A Series of biographical studies of the lives and work of a number of representative historical characters about whom have gathered the great traditions of the Nations to which they belonged, and who have been accepted, in many instances, as types of the several National ideals. With the life of each typical character will be presented a picture of the National conditions surrounding him during his career. The narratives are the work of writers who are recog- nized authorities on their several subjects, and, while thoroughly trustworthy as history, will present picturesque and dramatic "stories" of the Men and of the events con- nected with them. To the Life of each " Hero " will be given one duo- decimo volume, handsomely printed in large type, pro- vided with maps and adequately illustrated according to the special requirements of the several subjects. The volumes will be sold separately as follows : Cloth extra ........ $i 5o Half morocco, uncut edges, gilt top . . . i 75 Large paper, limited to 250 numbered copies for subscribers to the series. These may be ob- tained in sheets folded, or in cloth, uncut edges . . •> « • • • • 3 50 The first group of the Series will comprise twelve volumes, as follows : Nelson, and the Naval Supremacy of England. By W. Ci.ark Russell, authcjr of " The Wreck of the Grosvenor," etc. (Ready iVpril 15, 1S90.) Gustavus Adolphus, and the Struggle of Protestantism for Exist- ence. Bv C. R. L. Fletcher, M.A., late Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. Pericles, and the Golden Age of Athens. By Evelyn Abbott, M.A., Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford. Alexander the Great, and the Extension of Greek Rule and of Greek Ideas. By Prof. Benjamin I. Wheeler, Cornell University. Theoderic the Goth, the Barbarian Champion of Civilization. By THO^L\s HoDGKiN, author of " Italy and Her Invaders," etc. Charlemagne, the Reorganizer of Europe. By Prof. George L. Burr, Cornell University. Henry of Navarre, and the Huguenots in France. By P. F. Willert, M.A., Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford. William of Orange, the Founder of the Dutch Republic. By Ruth Putnam. Cicero, and the Fall of the Roman Republic. By J. L. Strachan Davhjson, M.A., Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford. Louis XIV., and the Zenith of the French Monarchy. By Arthur IIassall, M.A., Senior Student of Christ Church College, Oxford. Sir Walter Raleigh, and the Adventurers of England. By A. L. S.NHTH, M.A., Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford. Bismarck. The Nev7 German Empire : How It Arose ; What It Replaced ; And What It Stands For. By James Sime, author of "A Life of Lessing," etc. To be followed by : Hannibal, and the Struggle betvyeen Carthage and Rome. By E. A. Freeman, D.C.L., LL.I)., Regius Prof, of History in the University of Oxford. Alfred the Great, and the First Kingdom in England. By F. York Powell, M.A., Senior Student of Christ Church College, Oxford. Charles the Bold, and the Attempt to Found a Middle Kingdom. By R. Lou<;e, M.A., Fellow of Brasenose College, Oxford. John Calvin, the Hero of .he French Protestants. By Owen M. I^owarus, P'ellow of Lincoln College, Oxford. Oliver Cromv^ell, and the Rule of the Puritans in England. By Charles Firth, I'alliol College, Oxford. Marlborough, and England as a Military Power. By C. W. C. Oman, A.M., Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. Julius Caesar, and the Organization of the Roman Empire. By W. Warde Fowlkk, M.A., Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford. G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS New York London 27 AND 29 West Twentt-third Street > Editors. PUBLICATIONS OF G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS THE SCRIPTURES, HEBREW AND CHRISTIAN. ARRANGED AND EDITED AS AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE BIBLE. Rev. EDWARD T. BARTLETT, Ir.D., Dean of the Divinity School of the P. E. Church in Philadel- phia, and Mary Wolfe, Prof, of Ecclesiastical History. Rev. JOHN P. PETERS, Ph.D., Professor of Old Testament Literature and Language in the Divinity School of the P. E. Church in Philadelphia, and Professor of Hebrew in the University of Pennsylvania. The work is to be completed in three volumes, containing each about 500 pages, Vols. I. and II. now ready. Vol. I. includes Hebrew story from the Creation to the time of Nehe- miah, as in the Hebrew canon. Vol. II. is devoted to Hebrew poetry and prophecy. Vol. III. will contain the selections from the Christian Scriptures. The volumes are handsomely printed in i2mo form, and with an open, readable page, not arranged in verses, but paragraphed according to the ■tense of the narrative. Each volume is complete in itself, and will be sold separately at $1.50. The editors say in their announcement : " Our object is to remove stones of stumbling from the path of young readers by presenting Scriptures to them in a form as intelligible and as instructive as may be practicable. This plan involves some re arrangements and omissions, before which we have not hesitated, inasmucn as our proposed work will not claim to be the Bible, but an introduction to it. That we may avoid imposing our own inlerper- tation upon Holy Writ, it will be our endeavor to make Scripture serve as the commentary on Scripture. In the treatment of the Prophets of the Old Testament and the Epistles of the New Testament, it will not be practica- ble entirely to avoid comment, but no attempt will be made to pronounce upon doctrinal questions." The first volume is divided into four parts : Part I. — Hebrew Story, from the Beginning to the Time of Saul. " II.— The Kingdom of all Israel. " III. — Samaria, or the Northern Kingdom. " IV.— JUDAH, FROM ReHOBOAM TO THE ExiLE. PUBLICATIONS OF G. P PUTNAM'S SONS The second volume comprises : Part I. — Hebrew History from the Exile to Nehemiah. " n. — Hebrew Legislation. " HI. — Hebrew Tales. " IV. — Hebrew Prophecy. " V. — Hebrew Poetry. ''■ VI. — Hebrew Wisdom. The third volume will comprise the selections from the New Testament, arranged as follows : I. — The Gospel according to St. Mark, Presenting the Evan- gelical Story in its Simplest Form ; Supplemented by Selections from St. Matthew and St. Luke. IT. — The Acts of the Apostles, with some Indication of the Probable Place of the Epistles in the Narrative. IIL — The Epistles of St, James and the First Epistle of St, Peter. IV. — The Epistles of St. Paul. V. — The Epistle to the Hebrews. VI. — The Revelation of St. John (A Portion). VII. — The First Epistle of St. John. VIII. — The Gospel of St. John. Full details of the plan of the undertaking, and of the methods adopted by the editors in the selection and arrangement of the material, will be found in the separate prospectus. " I congratulate you on the issue of a work which, I am sure, will find a wide welcome, and the excellent features of which make it of permanent value." — Rt. Rev. Henry C. Potter, Bishop of New York. "Should prove a valuable adjunct of Biblical instruction." — Rt. Rev. W. E. Stevens, Bishop of Pennsylvania. "Admirably conceived and admirably executed. . . . It is the Bible Etory in Bible words. The work of scholarly and devout men. . . . Will prove a help to Bible study."— Rev. Howard Crosby, D.D. " We know of no volume which will better promote an intelligent understanding of the structure and substance of the Bible than this work, prepared, as it is, by competent and reverent Christian scholars." — Sunday- School Times. G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS New York : London : 37 and 29 west 23d street UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY AA 000 831 630 9 r C^