N 
 
 346.5 
 
 G720985 
 
 BURGON 
 
 SOME REMARKS ON ART 
 WITH REFERENCE TO THE 
 STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 LOS ANGELES
 
 I 
 
 r n s 
 
 SOME REMARKS ON ART 
 
 WITH REFERENCE TO 
 THE STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY.
 
 Ex Libris 
 C. K. OGDEN 
 
 Disce, docendus adliuc quae censet amioulus ; ut si 
 Caecus iter monstrare velit, tanion aspice, si quid 
 Et nos, quod cures propriura fecisse, loquamur." 
 
 HOKAT. Ep.i. 17,35.
 
 SOME REMARKS ON ART 
 
 THE STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY. 
 
 IN A LETTER ADDRESSED TO 
 
 THE REV. RICHARD GRESWELL, B.D., 
 
 TUTOR (LATK FELLOW) OF WORCESTER COLLEGE, 
 
 BY JOHN WILLIAM BURGON, B.A., 
 
 OF WORCESTER COLLEGE. 
 
 OXFOKD: 
 
 FRANCIS MACPHERSON. 
 
 1846.
 
 Imitation of Horace, Ep. i. 17., 3 5. 
 By an Anonymous hand. 
 
 Just give me leave, (although I don't pretend 
 
 Much wit myself,) to counsel, as a friend. 
 
 Blind as a bat, I own : a mere B.A. ; 
 
 And your own pupil, Sir, 'till yesterday ; 
 
 And yet, who knows ? in what has here been writ, 
 
 With all its want of learning, method, wit, 
 
 Something there may be, pertinent and true ; 
 
 Well worth the notice of the Dons and you !
 
 a 
 
 SOME REMARKS ON ART, 
 
 ETC. 
 
 MY DEAR MR. GRESWELL, 
 
 I WISH to offer a few remarks on the subject of Art, 
 in connection with this University : its importance in 
 a place consecrated to liberal studies : the great neglect 
 under which it labours : and the possible means of 
 giving it a larger share of the attention to which it 
 seems so well entitled : and I know of no one here to 
 whom those remarks can be addressed with so much 
 propriety as to yourself. Independent of all feelings of 
 respect for your learning, and gratitude for your friend- 
 ship, the circumstance of your having written a paper 
 in 1843, " On Education in the Principles of Art," and 
 advocated its claims before the Ashmolean Society, 
 would have been sufficient to guide me to you. 
 
 I am well aware that owing to the distance between 
 our respective positions in this place, much that would 
 command respect and attention from you, whose office 
 it is to teach, would be wholly unimportant from me, 
 whose business (and inclination) is only to learn. You 
 
 B
 
 2 THE AVRITEK S APOLOGY 
 
 are at liberty to complain of " a positive and notorious 
 defect in our system of education," where silence would 
 best befit me. However; such an admission on your part 
 has all the force of a sanction of the present endeavour: 
 and the same kind indulgence which so readily gave me 
 permission to address these remarks in the quarter I 
 desired, will, I am inclined to believe, readily acquit me 
 of any unbecoming feelings in approaching such a ques- 
 tion. It is hoped that others, to whom their author is 
 unknown, will not misinterpret him. Those whose 
 nature it is to feel warmly and strongly, often, half-un- 
 consciously, express themselves warmly and strongly too. 
 Hence one often seems to dictate, when one desires only 
 to suggest : to be laying down a law, when one merely 
 seeks to interpret a law already existing though not 
 generally recognised, because it is unwritten. If some 
 competent person would have taken the subject into 
 serious consideration, it would have been very agreeable 
 to me to remain silent: but not only does no one come 
 publicly forward, but (so far as my limited opportunities 
 have enabled me to observe), the subject is scarcely ever 
 so much as mooted among us : or if it be, it is quickly 
 suffered to drop. It seems admitted, by tacit consent, 
 that we are not well-read in Art ; and one observes that 
 really learned and intelligent men, (with a degree of 
 modesty which one cannot but secretly admire and wish 
 to imitate), shrink from discussions where both the 
 Opponent and the Respondent are in the dark ; or, to 
 say the least, see their way but indistinctly. In some 
 places men write and talk with increased ^volubility, pro- 
 portioned to their deficiency of real acquaintance with 
 the subject under consideration ; but it certainly is not 
 the case here.
 
 FOR TJIE I'RRSKNT KEMAKKSS. 3 
 
 As for these remarks being written in any undutiful 
 spirit, or suggested by any inclination to find fault with 
 one's elders and betters, it is too absurd a suspicion, I 
 should hope, to enter any one's head : and so I shall 
 take no pains to refute it. The deep, the unspeakable 
 obligations every man owes to Oxford, who has had 
 the blessing of being educated within her walls, can 
 inspire him with none but affectionate feelings towards 
 her. If an intense liking for her and for her system, and 
 an ardent desire to see her great and good in every way 
 (as she is great and good in most ways), be undutiful 
 and reprehensible, then indeed (but I trust not other- 
 wise), reprehensible and undutiful I am, and hope ever 
 
 to remain And after these few remarks, it is hoped 
 
 that it will be sufficiently clear why I shall abstain in 
 what follows from noticing our relative position ; why 
 I do not inquire whether our neighbours may not be as 
 behindhand as ourselves; for this seems quite the wrong 
 way to seek for improvement, whether in morals or any 
 other department. If it shall appear that we are de- 
 ficient, and that something may easily be achieved to sup- 
 ply our deficiency, it seems to me that we are possessed of 
 all the facts we require : and whatever want of know- 
 ledge may be betrayed by him who shall venture to 
 point out that deficiency, whatever want of ability 
 manifested in suggesting that remedy, it is not too 
 much perhaps to hope that the zeal which prompted the 
 endeavour may inspire some sympathy, though it may 
 fail to carry entire conviction : and so, indirectly at 
 least, be attended with that success, which, in abler 
 hands, so good a cause must have commanded, infallibly 
 and immediately. 
 
 The absence of all Enthusiasm for Art, alluded to just
 
 4 THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM. 
 
 now, as generally evidenced among us in conversation, 
 seems painfully reflected on the external features of our 
 University. I am not of course speaking of all Art. I do 
 not allude to Architecture. I am well aware that we 
 inhabit a city of palaces. You will have readily under- 
 stood my allusion, from the first, to be to specimens of 
 the other arts of design, as Sculpture, Painting, and the 
 like. With the exception of the venerable collection 
 of Elias Ashmole, we possess nothing which is called a 
 " Museum." True indeed it is that Ashmole's was the 
 first Museum in England : that the first actual step was 
 taken in Oxford; but we seem to have stood still (in this 
 department) for about two hundred years. We have 
 added little to the (so-called) objects of virtu brought 
 together by the taste and antiquarian feeling of that "fine 
 old English gentleman." Indeed, his Museum now derives 
 its chief interest from that very circumstance, I mean 
 its unchanged character. It is a genuine specimen of 
 an old English collection ; such as Sir Henry Wootton, 
 or Sir Samuel Pepys, or Mr. John Evelyn, or the 
 Founders of the Royal Society would have delighted in. 
 It is, for the most part, a collection of relics. There you 
 have a glove which was worn by Mary Queen of Scots, 
 and the uncomfortable shoe which belonged to John 
 Bigge the hermit of Dynton ; the state-sword which the 
 Pope gave to Henry the eighth, and a lock of Edward 
 the fourth's hair ; King Alfred's jewel, and a pair of 
 bellows that belonged to Charles the second ; an ancient 
 peg-tankard (presented by Sir C. Pegge\ and a pair o* 
 nutcrackers dated 1574. This enumeration of objects, 
 I trust I need not say, is made with no wish to cast 
 ridicule on a delightful old collection, and which in fact 
 contains many objects of a higher order than these ;
 
 THE BODLEIAN GALLERY. 5 
 
 objects deserving far more attention than they commonly 
 meet with. But after all, it is scarcely too much to say 
 that the Ashmolean is but a collection of curiosities. 
 With all respect for the portraits of the Tradescant family 
 on the stairs, and that of the Dodo in the entrance hall, 
 it must be allowed that it contains very little deserving 
 the name of Art. For Art then, where shall we turn ? 
 Probably to the Bodleian picture-gallery, which is 
 indeed a charming place to lounge in ; and where about 
 ten out of two hundred and forty-five pictures are agree- 
 able specimens of painting. No. 128 (by Keynolds) and 
 No. 160 (a portrait of Garrick), for instance, are worth 
 visiting as works of art ; * and are as superior to the rest, 
 as the angel over the pulpit in St. Mary's is superior to 
 the other thirteen angels in the same church :f biit the 
 pictures in the Bodleian, (generally speaking), are only 
 curiosities. Stiff portraits of cadaverous Scholars, and por- 
 tentous Founders, and quaint old worthies of all sorts with 
 their coats-of-arms above, and an inscription (in gilt letters 
 on a black ground) below ; memorials which disarm 
 criticism indeed ; nay, make one thrill, I should hope, 
 with a thousand nobler emotions than the very best Claude 
 ever inspired : but which, after all, as works of art are 
 I was almost going to say beneath notice. And so, after 
 glancing with pleasure at the beautiful models disposed 
 
 * Since this was written, there has been a transfer of about 
 seventy pictures from the Bodleian to the Taylor Gallery. 
 The Reynolds however remains, and is now No. 97. It is well 
 worth a visit. It seems by far the most precious work of art 
 in the collection. The absorbed look of the boy is very strik- 
 ing. What a pity it is that so fine a painting should be allowed 
 to hang so high ! 
 
 f That exquisite little figure must be looked at from the 
 undergraduates' gallery to be appreciated.
 
 O THE TWELVE (LESARS: THE KADCL1FFE : 
 
 along the room, we may suppose our stranger in Oxford 
 to have taken leave of the Bodleian. 
 
 Whither then is he to direct his steps ? Must he 
 wander from chapel to chapel, and hall to hall, and library 
 to library ; keeping a careful record as he goes along of 
 a curious piece of monumental sculpture here, or a fine 
 portrait there ; a good cast from the antique in a third 
 place, and perhaps a few valuable paintings hanging in 
 solitary beauty and obscurity in a fourth ? Nay, this is 
 scarcely legitimate. It is perhaps fairer to admit that he 
 must look elsewhere for the Art of the university ; and 
 the determination to do so, will perhaps strike him at the 
 eastern end of Broad-street, in full view of the twelve 
 astonishing heads which encircle the Theatre. There is an 
 indescribable pathos in those twelve dreary faces which 
 must have paralysed many a beholder ; but it is to be 
 feared, rather with wonder than admiration. They seem 
 placed there practically to illustrate the close connex- 
 ion which subsists between the sublime and the ridiculous : 
 and so we may suppose a stranger will think as he pur- 
 sues his search in the direction of the Radcliffe Library. 
 On entering that beautiful edifice he may well feel grate- 
 ful to the elegant taste and liberality of the Messieurs 
 Duncan who have added to its treasures the ornament 
 of casts from seven of the first statues of antiquity. The 
 same edifice contains a few other fine casts : yet how 
 very few ! The two marble candelabra with which it 
 was enriched by Sir Roger Newdigate deserve to be 
 particularly noticed : nor would it be dutiful to forget 
 the anxiety of that old knight to keep alive in the 
 University a taste for ancient "Sculpture, Painting, and 
 Architecture ;" though the specimens he has left of his
 
 THE POMFRET COLLECTION. 7 
 
 own judgment in these matters* forcibly remind one of 
 the grotesque period at which he lived : when Othello, 
 for example, was tolerated on the stage in a scarlet coat 
 and full-bottomed wig ; and when such vagaries as those 
 of Horace Walpole at Strawberry-Hill, were considered 
 true specimens of the sublime. 
 
 I desire to recollect all that we possess in the way of 
 works of art, lest I may seem unfair on Oxford: and 
 accordingly close my catalogue with the mention of the 
 Pomfret marbles, till now, deposited in a room in the 
 Schools; and guarded, be it observed, by a shilling bar- 
 rier, which it may be questioned if many persons were 
 tempted to surmount. That collection, accordingly, which 
 exhibited an effort made a hundred years ago to dignify 
 this seat of learning with specimens of the antique, and 
 which was thus, in a certain sense, the most important 
 depository of Art in Oxford, had become one of the most 
 unknown and insignificant of its sights. Nor can one 
 wonder that it was rarely visited; possessing as it did 
 all the dissuasives, and few of the attractions of antiquity. 
 Its very grim and fearfully mutilated gods and goddesses 
 always reminded me of a story told by Mr. Combe, the late 
 keeper of the antiquities in the British Museum. A Lady 
 of rank requested him to show her the treasures in his 
 custody. He complied. " And now, Mr. Combe," she 
 said, when the exhibition was concluded, " we will go 
 and see the Elgin marbles." " I have just had the 
 
 * Sir Roger's house at Arburj is described to me by a 
 friend as "a curious yet pleasing mixture of classic and gothic, 
 and containing an old museum something like the Ashmolean. 
 The antique statues are placed in decorated niches ; and there 
 is a clere- story to (I think) the dining-room. Sir Eoger " he 
 adds, " has adapted an old tomb to serve as a chimney piece in 
 University-College Hall."
 
 8 THE ARUNDEL COLLECTION. 
 
 honour of explaining them to your ladyship." "What? 
 Those the Elgin marbles ! why really one sees so many 
 crippled objects in the streets, that one hardly cares to see 
 them cut out in marble, Mr. Combe." And in truth it re- 
 quires a considerable education to relish a mutilated work 
 of ancient art. The first impression is very often of a 
 ridiculous kind : hence perhaps the suspicion with which 
 the raptures of the antiquary are sometimes regarded. 
 It is hard at first to conceive that what makes us laugh 
 should make him kindle with enthusiasm. Yet the ex- 
 perience of some branch of polite study with which we 
 are ourselves familiar, music, poetry, painting, 
 should convince us that the fault lies in us and not in 
 him. These remarks are not quite irrelevant. The 
 Pomfret marbles might almost as well not have been, as 
 been where and what they were. The room was dark, and 
 crowded with "crippled objects." The number of supple- 
 mentary noses, arms, fingers, etc., passed all bounds. To 
 the best of my remembrance, the statues themselves were 
 not only for the most part exceedingly inferior specimens, 
 but disposed in the most inartificial way imaginable. 
 Even an experienced eye scarcely knew what to be at 
 when it got in. An inexperienced person must have 
 longed to get out. 
 
 It is high time to remark that in the preceding exami- 
 nation of works of art in Oxford, the Arundel collection, 
 which is by far the greatest treasure we possess, has 
 been passed over, simply because it is a collection of 
 ancient Greek Inscriptions ; and these, however transcen- 
 dent in point of interest, scarcely come within the terms 
 of our inquiry. Yet it may be permitted me most sin- 
 cerely to deplore the forlorn plight in which those relics, 
 of which we ought to be so proud, are allowed to lie.
 
 THE TAYLOR GALLERY. 
 
 9 
 
 Why are they not drawn forth from the desolate apart- 
 ment where they have been so long kept under lock and 
 key, and exposed to the public gaze ? It must surely be felt, 
 that if we are so immensely behind our continental neigh- 
 bours in antiquarian lore, it is in a manner our own fault. 
 We seem unconscious of our deficiencies ; and even when 
 they are in part supplied, we turn the key on the trea- 
 sures entrusted to our stewardship. Every foreign student 
 indeed who visits Oxford does obtain an interview with 
 the Arundel marbles : but it is to be feared that many of 
 our own graduates leave Alma Mater, aware of nothing 
 beyond the bare fact of their existence. 
 
 Such seems no unfair review of our repositories of works 
 of Art. As for what precious prints may lie hid in this 
 portfolio, or curious drawings in that : what choice carv- 
 ings may be here, or cabinet of coins there, I do not 
 of course inquire. There are such things, I know. We 
 all know too, that no respectable applicant who really 
 wishes to see any or all of them, need go away disap- 
 pointed. All that is intended, amounts to this, that if a 
 person wishes to pass an hour in the study of such works 
 as we have been alluding to, he is at a loss to know in 
 what direction to bend his steps. 
 
 These then, till very lately, were our resources: and 
 the stranger whom we have been supposing in quest of 
 the tca\6v, when he had visited the several haunts enume- 
 rated, might be considered to have seen all that Oxford 
 had to show in the way of repositories of Art. This, 
 however, would be a true supposition no longer. It is 
 now about two years since a succession of covered wagons 
 were to be seen slowly moving in procession in the direc- 
 tion of the newly erected Taylor gallery. What they 
 could possibly contain was a mystery, and gave rise to
 
 10 THE CASTS OF CHANTKEY's WORKS 
 
 much ingenious speculation. For my own part, 1 was struck 
 with what looked like an enormous ostrich's egg emerg- 
 ing from the canopy of one of the wagons ; which how- 
 ever on closer inspection proved not to belong to a 
 bird's nest, but to be the apex of a statue ; the bald 
 head of somebody whom Chantrey had immortalised. 
 When the canopy was in part removed, a succession of 
 gamboge-coloured personages were brought to light, 
 standing, sitting, reclining, the whole length of the 
 vehicle. An imaginative person would have fancied 
 that he beheld the deities of old Rome (A. u. c. 365) on 
 their road to Caere; but which had lost their way, and 
 by some unaccountable accident, blundered into Beau- 
 mont-street. 
 
 Since the period alluded to, those statues which 
 proved to be the plaster casts of Sir. F. Chantrey 's works, 
 have been housed in the best apartment of the Taylor 
 gallery. They have long since been divested of their 
 "orange-tawny" complexion: mounted on bases: and 
 disposed in order throughout the apartment. They have 
 indeed been very tastefully finished off, and placed as 
 advantageously as was feasible : but they are, after all, the 
 things they were. They are but the contents of Chantrey 's 
 atelier : and such as they are, they are the principal fea- 
 ture of attraction in the Taylor gallery. A stranger who 
 should visit Oxford now, would naturally guide his foot- 
 steps thither, as to a depository of works of art; and 
 would infer that the objects in question were of such an 
 order of excellence as to satisfy the requirements of the 
 University. 
 
 That persons of a cultivated taste among us should feel 
 really satisfied with these statues, is too absurd to be for 
 an instant supposed : but that they have been admitted
 
 SHOULD BE EJECTED FROM THE GALLERY. 1 1 
 
 into the principal apartment in a structure consecrated 
 to the Fine Arts that they entirely fill that apartment 
 and are disposed as if they were intended to remain there 
 for ever, is a plain matter of fact : and it seems no unfair 
 inference from this circumstance, that the full extent of the 
 responsibilities which the possession of an empty gallery 
 has entailed upon the University, has not been fully 
 appreciated. Who the persons are, to whose taste and 
 liberality we must hereafter look for the wise appropria- 
 tion of the vacant edifice, I have very studiously refrained 
 from inquiring. I was afraid lest respect, or partiality, 
 when I came to be told of admired and honoured names, 
 might impose a painful silence on me, or blind my judg- 
 ment. As it is, these remarks may be penned with entire 
 freedom. My eyes are fixed solely on that new structure, 
 and on those modern monumental statues. In the former, I 
 recognise an opportunity at last presenting itself, late 
 enough, but still in time, for securing to ourselves a 
 most important advantage : in the latter, I see a heavy 
 blow aimed at those fair prospects. Let me at once 
 declare that I deprecate in the strongest terms the ad- 
 mission of those casts into our public gallery ; and augur 
 most mournfully of the prospects of an Institution com- 
 menced under such miserable auspices. But this is writ- 
 ing vaguely. Such general condemnation of works which, 
 in proper place, and at proper time, have been so long, 
 (and I cheerfully add, so justly) admired, can carry no 
 conviction. Give me leave, then, to offer a few remarks 
 which may assist us in coming to the conclusion that we 
 must resolutely entreat the authorities of this Institution 
 to remove the statues in question, and substitute some- 
 thing of a very different kind in their room. You I am 
 sure will bear with me if, in attempting to discuss an
 
 12 STUDIES OF OXFORD. 
 
 interesting question, I venture to go back a little, and to 
 begin as it were at the beginning. 
 
 I would observe then, that here in Oxford where 
 everything is done for the education of the Heart and of 
 the Understanding, nothing seems to be done for .the 
 education of the Eye. Perhaps it would be a more correct 
 way of making the same remark to say, that in the Moral 
 and Intellectual education which a man here receives, no 
 account is taken of the possibility of materially influencing 
 both natures by physical means : of giving a high and holy 
 impress to the one, and aiding the correct development 
 of the other. The solicitude of those by whom the main 
 outline of our scheme of education was mapped out, to 
 purify the heart and sanctify the understanding, is written 
 in such legible characters on the system daily pursued 
 within these walls, that it cannot be mistaken. With- 
 holding only the foremost place from those sciences which 
 deal exclusively with Quantity and Number, they have 
 substituted in their room, as the student's primary concern, 
 the science of Ethics sacred and profane. They have 
 assigned to Logic so prominent a station, because they have 
 regarded it not as a mere art of argumentation, to ensure 
 victory in the war of words ; but as a test of the reasoning 
 process itself, and a severe discipline of thought. The 
 course of Religious instruction, elementary as it must ne- 
 cessarily be in a system which proposes . to prepare men 
 alike for the duties of the senate, of the bar, and of the 
 pastoral Office is of such a kind as rather to impress young 
 men with the Beauty of Holiness than to set them on 
 speculations about the evidences of Religion : and it 
 seems the object of the ancient History and Poetry, which 
 form so large a part of our concern, to exercise the under- 
 standing, to enlarge the sympathies, to cultivate and
 
 FOEM AND COLOUR. 13 
 
 purify the taste. The entire course of study when viewed 
 in retrospect seems intended as a broad groundwork, on 
 which the student may rear his future structure with 
 safety. Much indeed this is; more, it may be, than any 
 of us are fully aware of: but it seems scarcely presump- 
 tuous to express one's conviction that it might easily be 
 made much more still. These pursuits, as already re- 
 marked, are all of an abstract kind; and from their very 
 nature must often be the indirect way of obtaining 
 knowledge. The eye remains wholly uneducated. And 
 is this because Form and Colour have nothing to do with 
 education? Some one will perhaps gruffly answer 
 " Yes." But is it likely that this should be a true 
 answer ? Two of the affections of bodies Number and 
 Quantity are deemed sufficiently important to constitute 
 the principal feature in the education of the sister Univer- 
 sity : a high place too they enjoy in our own system. 
 Is it not somewhat extraordinary that two other, equally 
 inseparable, affections of bodies, Form and Colour 
 shoTild constitute, in neither place, any part of education 
 at all? 
 
 Something like the answer which might be returned to 
 this interrogatory can be readily anticipated; and I trust 
 it will soon appear that I am not such a visionary as to 
 suppose that the three or four years a young man passes 
 at College is the "proper season for perplexing him with 
 the theory of Colour ; or to claim his serious attention, as 
 a matter of academical requirement, to Form, either 
 abstractedly or in the concrete. This, we are well aware, 
 would be not only unwise, but wholly impracticable. In 
 suggesting two such important subjects however, as in- 
 struments of education, it must be readily conceded that 
 it may at least deserve some consideration to what extent 
 they may be made available. They sound like shadowy
 
 14 A PLEA FOR THE STUDY 
 
 College Tutors I grant ; but in some of their many con- 
 crete shapes, as statues or pictures, who will deny that 
 they might be made conducive to this high object ? They 
 would at all events make their appeal to the heart and 
 understanding immediately through the eye ; and so 
 become an object for many unconscious sympathies and 
 indefinite longings, and a help to many purer and better 
 thoughts. But besides all this, as will be soon shewn, they 
 might be made useful in a direct and obvious manner. 
 It may be allowed me to suggest, in passing, that some- 
 thing of that humanising influence which the study of 
 Music effected for the youth of Athens in their educational 
 course, seems capable of being achieved for ourselves by the 
 introduction of a kindred feeling a taste for the Arts 
 of Design. For many centuries, Music was regarded by 
 ourselves no less than by the ancients,* as an indispensable 
 branch of liberal study ; but unhappily, for many a long 
 year this science has been disregarded (in England) as an 
 instrument of education. I say unhappily ; for the heart 
 is what it was : its needs are the same : and those needs 
 have been fully felt, and frequently insisted upon. In Plato's 
 beautiful description of Athenian education, he explains 
 the office of poetry and music in forming the character 
 of youth; r iva rjfiepwrepoi re wo-i, Kal evpvdfAorepoi Kal 
 vapfj,ocrr6repoi ryisyvofievot, xprfa IJAOI waiv ei? TO \eyeiv 
 re Kal Trpdrreiv : and sums up with the remark, ira<s yap 
 6 /3w>5 rov dvQpaiTTOv evpvOiiias re Kal evap/jiocrrias SeiraiJ 
 This, however, is but taking one view of the subject, 
 
 * My dear brother (the Rev. Henry J. Rose) has called my 
 attention to a series of Treatises by S. Augustine on the great 
 branches of Education, or Seven liberal Sciences ; of which 
 those on Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric, and Music are still ex- 
 tant. *This series appears to be the earliest instance of the 
 elatfs of books called Encyclopedias in the middle ages. 
 
 -f Protagoras, p. 326 B.
 
 OF ART, IN OXFORD. 15 
 
 regarding /MovffiKrj namely, as a discipline; and it perhaps 
 may be thought that if the non-cultivation of Music be a 
 defect in our system, the substitution of the Arts of Design 
 would be, to say the least, a mere experiment : that Music 
 should be restored if Music be wanted : and that if such 
 observing and sagacious persons as the ancients had 
 thought the contemplation of Art desirable, they would 
 not have omitted to supply the young with such objects 
 for contemplation. All this however is not quite true. 
 We have already said that we desire to see Music restored 
 to its accustomed place of honour ; but it would not 
 answer all the ends we have in view, for many plain rea- 
 sons. The ancients moreover were spared the necessity 
 of introducing works of art to the notice of their youth ; 
 for the cities of antiquity, (Athens in particular, which 
 was the University of the civilized world till the latter end 
 of the sixth century when its temples were converted 
 into churches, and its schools finally closed), were full, to 
 overflowing, of works of art. Other reasons will be soon 
 added, further shewing the unfairness of the comparison. 
 It may be assumed then, that the education of the Ear, 
 however desirable, would not supply the place of the edu- 
 cation of the Eye, nor supersede the necessity for it. 
 
 Persons who are zealously attached to things as they 
 are, and who dread all innovation, among whose re- 
 spectable number let me ever find a place, will naturally 
 object to this, that it looks like advocating a novelty, 
 recommending the introduction of a new, and as yet un- 
 tried element into education. The proper subject of 
 study, say they, are the works of ancient authors. It has 
 been the practice of the civilised world from time imme- 
 morial to lay these before the young,* and it may well be 
 
 * See Plato's description of the employments of a school in 
 his day, Protag. p. 325 D. The passage is too interesting to
 
 16 THE ANALOGY BETWEEN ANCIENT 
 
 assumed to be the right method. Now, all this is unde- 
 niable: the fact, and the inference from the fact, are 
 cheerfully conceded. But, let me ask, what are the 
 "Works o Antiquity"? It will be answered, * the re- 
 mains of ancient Literature. But surely these are not all 
 the works of antiquity which have come down to us ! The 
 shores of time are strewed with other wrecks besides those 
 of the writings of Poets, and Historians, and Philosophers. 
 How comes it that in an University which is so attentively 
 bent on understanding the mind of the ancients, the at- 
 tention should be confined to one class of their works, 
 to the utter exclusion of every other ? 
 
 The Analogy which subsists between the remains of 
 ancient Literature, and those of ancient Art is perhaps 
 somewhat closer and more interesting than at first sight 
 might be supposed to be the case. Some of these points 
 of resemblance are obvious. Greek Poetry and Greek 
 Sculpture for example, are independent but kindred 
 methods of expressing national feeling : both were in their 
 origin of a religious character : both underwent a peculiar 
 
 be kept from the English reader: " Parents," says he, " send 
 their children at a very tender age to school, enjoining on the 
 master far greater attention to their external deportment, than 
 to their proficiency in reading and music. Not that their 
 teachers, however, neglect their progress in these branches of 
 study; for when the children have learnt their letters, and are 
 able to understand what they read, (their education having 
 been hitherto conducted orally), the reading-master makes 
 them sit on benches, and forces them to read and learn by 
 heart portions of the works of the best poets. These abound 
 in maxims for guidance, in episodes, and panegyrics of ancient 
 worthies ; which it is hoped will inflame the young with the ge- 
 nerous desire to emulate such excellence, and with a longing 
 to become great and good themselves. The music-master 
 meantime bestows exactly the same attention on their good 
 conduct, and sees that the children commit no mischief, &c." 
 Compare Aristoph. Nub. 961 972; and Ranee, 1030 to verse 1056.
 
 LITERATURE, AND ANCIENT ART. 17 
 
 progressive development, and reflected the successive as- 
 peets of Greek Society : both attained to the highest pitch 
 of excellence at about the same time ; and both have 
 descended to us in a fragmentary state. Out of each of 
 these remarks, several others naturally arise. Since ancient 
 Art is fragmentary, and it is therefore difficult to under- 
 stand ancient Art ; we may be sure that the small portion 
 of the ancient writings which have come down to us must 
 for ever exclude us from a perfect appreciation of ancient 
 Literature. Again, if a single statue out of a group, or 
 the fragment of a frieze, can only be imperfectly under- 
 stood, particularly when they have been mutilated, so 
 must it be with single or fragmentary compositions in 
 Literature: but I abstain from insisting longer on a re- 
 semblance which might evidently be carried much further. 
 Such considerations then, seem at once to recommend 
 ancient Sculpture to our notice, and to suggest a doubt 
 whether we may not have been too long strangers to it. 
 But the interest it possesses for us, has surely been very 
 inadequately stated. Let us consider for a moment what 
 we mean when we say that Greek Sculpture, no less than 
 Greek Poetry, is one of the methods of expressing national 
 feeling. Surely, if it be so, it might be inferred d priori 
 that we should find it visibly impressed with the charac- 
 teristics of the national mind, just as the idiom of the 
 Greek language, in countless particulars, reminds one of 
 the character and genius of the extraordinary people on 
 whose lips it became the plastic instrument of expression 
 in every department of thought and sentiment. If, for 
 instance, the impatience of the national character, of which 
 it was remarked by one of themselves that no skill on the 
 part of the orator could effectually baffle it, seems to ac- 
 count for the withholding of the subject of the verb to the
 
 18 
 
 end of the sentence* : if their quickness, their 
 is borne silent testimony to, in their elliptical modes of 
 expression, so frequent and so perplexing, most frequent 
 and perplexing perhaps in their philosophical writings : 
 if their scientific precision enlarged their vocabulary, and 
 multiplied the inflexions of their nouns and verbs ; and 
 their fertile imaginations required a language which should 
 accommodate itself to every novel and extraordinary 
 compound : if their politeness found relief in the condi- 
 tional uncertainty of the optative mood with the particle 
 av\ and suggested the interrogative form where other 
 nations use the imperative : if that language occasionally 
 embodies features of the national faith; as, that the concep- 
 tion of the Universe is convertible with the conception of 
 Order, that Truth is in its very nature incapable of obli- 
 vion that Beauty and Goodness are so intimately connect- 
 ed, that they should form one single word, and that the 
 Happy man is he who stands well with his GODf: again, 
 
 * Thucydides b. iii. latter part of c. 38 Perhaps the po- 
 sition of the main word in the following references may repay 
 a student for his pains in verifying them in Dindorf s edition : 
 
 'Op<rrr/c, -/Esch. Ay. 879: "ArXav, Prom. V. 427: 'Optorai', 
 Soph. El. 163: AlyiaQov, ib. 957: Qr}<rvg, (Ed. Col. 1350: 
 'OJWffeue, Phil. 1139. Cf. also Hor. Carm. iii. 7. 5. (Gygen). 
 
 The English reader (and the classical reader too) will be 
 gratified by the following very faithful version of the passage last 
 referred to, for which I am indebted to A. H. Clough, Esq., of 
 Oriel College: 
 
 Why, Asteria, weep, whom the Favonian 
 Spring-tide breezes 'ill bring, safe to thee home again ; 
 Rich with ware of the Indies, 
 
 Thy true lover immutable, 
 Gyges?... 
 
 f Kofffjios a\r)Qeia KaXoKayadia tv^aip.ovia. See p. 299 
 of Tupper's beautiful " Proverbial Philosophy." Aristotle, 
 Eth. Nic. vi. 5. 8. Hooker, Eccl. Pol. b. i. 1. Arist. Etli. 
 NIC. x. 9, 1, (the verse especially,) and x. fi, 13 adfoiem.
 
 THE IMPRESS OF THE GREEK MIND. 19 
 
 if their belief in the influence of the eye* led them to 
 connect the accusative of the noun with verbs of Sight ; 
 though Sound and Touch and Taste and Smell require a 
 genitive, in other words, if they shewed by a simple 
 inflexion that, in the case of these four senses, the source of 
 the sensation was conceived of as residing in the outward 
 object; while in the case of sight, it resided in the eye : 
 if their theory of the supremacy of Mind led them to 
 express notions connected with intellectual speculation by 
 compounding the verb with Kara, implying that in the 
 speaker's view the mind is sublime, and must humble 
 itself, must look down, to take cognizance of the things of 
 sensef : in a word ; if we may trace the intellectual dis- 
 position of Greece visibly impressed on the very language 
 of Greece, and therefore, a fortiori, on her literature, 
 then, surely, we may expect to find some impress of that 
 mind on the works of Art she has bequeathed to us : and 
 should it appear that anything of the kind is discoverable, 
 how shall we excuse ourselves for wholly neglecting the 
 study of these, while we are so intent on the study of the 
 other? Why, at all events, exclude ourselves from such 
 
 * The superstitious belief in the evil eye has been treated 
 of by many ; and is alluded to by almost every writer of An- 
 tiquity. So widely spread a notion seems to give point to such 
 passages as JEsch.Ag. 240, 470, 742-4, etc. See also Dindorf s cor- 
 rection of Soph. Frg. 169, ad JEsch. Ag. 240. It may be allow- 
 able to remark in connection with this subject, that the ancients 
 evidently regarded the eye as the seat of expression. See ^Es- 
 chylus Agam. 271, 418 (supposing the line to mean "Where 
 the eye of woman beams not," etc.), 520-1, 796-8. Sophocles, 
 (Ed. Tyr. 528-9, (Ed. Col 729-30, Ant. 690, Ajax, 139-40, 462, 
 etc. (Dindorf s ed.) 
 
 f Not only verbs which denote mental perception (e. g. 
 yEuperptKol ...Karavoovaiv cKturro), but verbs of hearing: for 
 instance, oi yap ^/XavXoi acWarouffi rote Xoyoie fpOffi%tiv, fay 
 avXoin'roc, K.T.\. Ar. Eth. Nic. x. 5- 8.
 
 20 ANALOGY BETWEEN GREEK TRAGEDY 
 
 singularly apposite illustrations of the literature of Greece 
 as the works of her most gifted sons ? 
 
 Let us see then whether, without incurring the charge 
 of being unduly fanciful, some indication of Greek feeling, 
 analogous to those noticed in the structure of the lan- 
 guage, may not be traced on the representations which 
 have come down to us ; and pursuing the analogy already 
 noticed between Sculpture and the severer forms of dramatic 
 composition, in Greek Tragedy for example, I suppose 
 we are immediately struck with such characteristics as the 
 following. We find a few great stories, as the history 
 of CEdipus or of Agamemnon; the " tale of Troy divine" 
 being as it were a summum genus, under which almost all 
 may be comprehended. Six of the seven extant plays of 
 Sophocles are clearly to be referred to this source ; besides 
 most of those of jEschylus, and of Euripides. When we 
 are told the subject of the drama, we can guess the names 
 of the spectral shapes which are about to stalk before us. 
 Whatever phase of the history of Agamemnon is to be- 
 come the lofty theme, we can divine, with more or less 
 accuracy, who are to be the agents. Nor does there seem 
 any wish on the part of the poet to change this order of 
 things, to escape from the trammels of his craft. We 
 find no impatience of restraint no Gothic wish to intro- 
 duce many speakers, and hitherto untried elements. He 
 seems the creature of the same stern Necessity which im- 
 pelled Agamemnon, and Clytaemnestra, and Orestes: 
 spell-boTind by the same terrible power which hurled 
 CEdipus down to unutterable misery. Observe too how 
 little of plot there is in the ancient drama; if one could 
 forget the climax to which we are brought by the line, 
 
 aKovetv a\\ J o//,<w?
 
 AND GKEEK SCULPTURE. 21 
 
 one might almost say that there is an utter absence of plot 
 in these plays. The characters come before us like statues. 
 When they make their appearance, they excite no emotion : 
 when they have ceased to speak, they leave behind no 
 regret. One cannot even always feel sure whether a 
 speaker has left the stage or not; nor how many persons 
 are upon it at any given time. On the other hand, it is 
 seldom of any importance that we should know these 
 circumstances. All is, for the most part, sublimely cold, 
 and statuesque, and passionless: in which particulars one 
 is strongly reminded of the extraordinary contrast between 
 the Greek and the English (allow me to call it the Gothic) 
 drama. And whence is this? Chiefly, probably, hence: 
 the Gothic drama supposes the freedom of the will. The 
 Greek drama is impressed with the belief that man is the 
 creature of Necessity. Hence our stirring plot our 
 varied subject our diversity of incident our endless 
 variety of character. A poet would be thought just as 
 presumptuous now, if he were to write a play about 
 Hamlet, or Macbeth, or King Lear, as he would have 
 been thought then if he had presumed to depart from the 
 mighty precedent, and ventured on wholly untrodden 
 ground. 
 
 And if there be truth in all this, as I suppose it will be 
 granted that, on the whole, there is; then, let us admit 
 that there is something equally peculiar, equally charac- 
 teristic in the feeling which seems to have influenced the 
 sculptors of antiquity in the remains of plastic Art which 
 have come down to our times. Here, as in the realms of 
 poetry, we shall find the artists of a fine age tied down to 
 certain conventional stories and conventional forms. In 
 this, as in that, Eeligion is the source of inspiration ; for 
 the earliest efforts of Art, no less than the original element
 
 22 ANCIENT LITERATURE 
 
 of the drama, were consecrated expressly to Heaven ; and 
 neither ever wholly lost this character. Gods, and heroes, 
 and deified men, were at first the only fit subjects for the 
 artist ; and the period perhaps hardly ever arrived when they 
 were not acknowledged to be the proper objects for the 
 exercise of his skill. In Tragedy therefore, if a living in- 
 dividual, or existing political institutions are to be glanced 
 at, the speech is put into the mouth of a god, or some illus- 
 trious mythic personage: and in Art, if Alexander the 
 Great is to be portrayed, it is with the horn of Ammon ; 
 when the earlier kings of Egypt and some of those of Syria 
 appear on coins, it is with the radiated crown of deity ; and 
 even in Roman times, if a portrait of Antinoiis is intended, 
 the form and attributes are those of a Mercury. We 
 recognise in ancient art generally, and in the ancient 
 statues of sacred personages in particular, the same faith- 
 ful adherence to a received type which we before noticed 
 in the drama. An antiquary will immediately assent to 
 the statement that the Greek deities which we call by the 
 Latin names of Jupiter, Juno, Bacchus, Minerva, Mer- 
 cury, Venus, Neptune, etc., have each their distinct types 
 or modes of representation ; and may be readily recog- 
 nised, however rudely executed. Minerva, for instance, 
 is a standing, draped, female figure attired in the aegis, 
 and armed with a helmet, shield, and spear, such a con- 
 ventional figure, in short, as Pisistratus represented her, 
 when he wanted his countrymen to recognise her.* Juno 
 is draped, and generally seated (^pvaoOpovosi) ; wearing a 
 peculiar head-ornament. Venus is a draped figure, (in 
 
 * Herod, i. 60. It would be easy to give references to 
 works of art, executed in remote countries, and at distant 
 periods, where a certain type has been faithfully adhered to : 
 but it would answer no adequate purpose in so slight a com- 
 position as the present.
 
 AND ART, CONVENTIONAL. 23 
 
 archaic art), slightly raising her garment with one 
 hand, as if in the act of dancing. Other personages, as 
 Penelope, Ulysses, Achilles, Hector, Theseus, Hercules, 
 or monsters, as the Sphinx, the Chimaera, the river 
 Achelolis, and the like, are equally recognisable; though 
 in some instances, to pronounce upon them with accu- 
 racy, and at once, requires a good eye and great experi- 
 ence. Brondsted, for instance, thought he recognised the 
 type of Cephalus (as the figure occurs on the coins of 
 Cephallenia) in the so-called Theseus of the Parthenon 
 marbles. Enough however on this subject. I merely 
 seek to explain what I mean when I speak of a conven- 
 tional representation ; and to make the analogy between 
 Literature and Art, in this particular, apparent. The 
 ancients, in truth, carried all this much further. They 
 had conventional modes of representing the horse, the 
 bull, the lion ; birds and fish ; flowers and trees ; interiors 
 of houses ; the sea ; a lake ; a fountain ; a river ; a 
 town; and the like. Are we not reminded in all this 
 of a certain uniformity, or sameness, a certain recurrence 
 of thought and expression* in the Greek drama? of that 
 eternally recurring similef of the mournful nightingale 
 for example, bewailing " Itys, Itys." Had it not become 
 a kind of conventional type of sorrow ? 
 
 We have also to observe in illustration of the statuesque 
 
 * For instance, Soph. Aj. 479 80; El. 989, 1082 3; Track. 
 
 721 ; Frg. 436 ; Ms. Fry. 82, 163, 384 Again, Soph. Frg. 359, 
 
 610,683 Again, Soph. Frg. 288, 302,666 ; JEs. Frg. 277 
 
 Again, Soph. Aj. 125 6 ; Frg. 13, 682 ; Eurip. JEol. Frg 18. 
 
 Again, Solon's reply ; Soph. Track. 1 3 ; (Ed. Tyr. 1186, 
 
 etc., 1528 30 ; Frg. 520, 572 Again, Soph. El. 696 7 ; (Ed. 
 
 Col. 253 4 ; Aj. 455 6 ; Antig. 1337 8 ; Herod, passim 
 
 Again, Soph. Track. 132, etc., 440 ; Aj. 131 2 ; El. 916 7 ; 
 Antig. 1158 9 ; Frg. 93 ; Her. i. 5, ad fin. 207, &c. &c. &c. 
 
 + See JEsch. Ag. 1140 1149: Soph. EL 147 149 and 1077 ; 
 Ajax, 622 634: Antig. 422 125; Track. 962 963, etc.
 
 24 THE STATUESQUE CHARACTER 
 
 character of the ancient drama, that the masks which the 
 personages wore, supply an additional link in the chain of 
 resemblances; and help to establish the unity of spirit 
 which pervaded the works of antiquity. How statue- 
 like, how unspeakably cold, must the beings which the 
 poet called up, have seemed, as they glided across the 
 stage with those blank unvarying faces: only recog- 
 nisable by the conventional character of the mask, or 
 costume, as already hinted. Thus Achilles and Niobe 
 were recognisable, though they sat on the stage muffled 
 up, ypv^ovTes ovSe TOUT/.* There can have been little 
 or nothing of passion even in the most passionate parts of a 
 play, with such calmness of language, with such circum- 
 stances of costume. The very recognition of Orestes 
 and Electra must have been scarcely distinguishable from 
 the embracing figures of a group in marble. Some will 
 perhaps think that the gaudy drapery, the /cpoicov /3a<f>ri, 
 would sufficiently rescue stage representations from this 
 charge ; but they must be reminded that the statues of 
 antiquity were all painted. The eyes and the flesh were 
 tinted the hair often gilded the drapery, scarlet or blue, 
 and the like : so that there was nothing to distinguish an 
 actor in repose from a statue. Instead therefore, of con- 
 trasting a heroine of antiquity with the Portias and 
 Juliets of the Gothic drama, we should (if we would under- 
 stand them) throw ourselves into the mind of antiquity; 
 and think of them as figures on a bas-relief. One would 
 not perhaps be so apt to charge with frigidity, the lyric 
 lamentations of Antigone just before her entombment, if 
 one were to read those verses, sitting before an ancient 
 frieze. It would be like reading an interpretation of the 
 sculptured marble. The same remark may also be made 
 
 * Aristoph. Ranee, 911 913.
 
 OF GREEK TRAGEDY. 25 
 
 respecting Clytaemnestra, who is commonly compared 
 with Lady Macbeth ; and well she may be ; for certainly 
 if one believed in the transmigration of souls, one would 
 suppose that the mind of ^Eschylus had revived in the 
 mind of Shakspeare : I can in no other way defend or ac- 
 count for her cold-blooded dialogue with her son when he 
 was about to incur the guilt of matricide, than by remind- 
 ing myself of the statuesque spirit of ancient Tragedy : and 
 perhaps the passage in which she draws so perfect an image 
 of a Mother and her sleeping infant, and which seems 
 to unman Orestes, 
 
 9, w iral, rov8e &' ai'Secrat, re/cvov, 
 yu,aoTov, Trpo? c5 crv TroXXa Brj BPI'ZQN "AMA 
 OV\OI<TIV 
 
 has already suggested the same thought to many. One 
 sees the outstretched arms of the unnatural parent, and 
 
 * Choeph. 896 898. The English reader may not disdain 
 even so imperfect a rendering of the passage as the following : 
 
 Hold back thy murd'rous hand, my son! my child! 
 Look on this breast and feel some touch of pity : 
 This breast, where thou (so many a time and oft !) 
 Hast hung; and in thy sleep with boneless gums 
 Drawn the warm milk that did sustain thy being. 
 
 ^Eschylus was a great painter. Besides a multitude of passages 
 equally graphic with that just quoted, see the allusions in 
 Ag. 41-2 419: 241 242: 741: Eum. 50-52; (the painting 
 he refers to may be seen in Millingen's Unedit. Monuments, 
 ser. i. pi. xv). Compare also the lines Ag. 113 120 with the 
 coin of Agrigentum which Noehden has engraved, (Specimens 
 of Anc. Coins of Magna Crrcecia and Sicily, etc., pi. iii. p. 7), a 
 composition which must have struck JEschylus during his 
 residence in Sicily. The poet's graphic turn may also be 
 inferred from Ar. Ran. 933. Bacchus : " Yes, by the gods ! 
 why, / remember lying awake all night, trying to think what 
 kind of fowl the tawny horse-cock was." JEschylus : " 'Twas 
 painted on a ship, you blockhead, for a sign."
 
 26 OTHEll TRACES OF THE COLD, 
 
 her bare neck : Orestes with averted eyes ; and Pylades 
 calmly reminding him of the risk he incurs of offending 
 heaven, if he shrinks from the execution of its mandates. 
 
 Now, though it certainly is not necessary to the illus- 
 tration of the subject immediately before us, I cannot 
 forbear further remarking, in this place, that the traces of 
 the cold statuesque spirit which we have found pervading 
 some of the realms of ancient Art and Literature, may be 
 discovered extending much further in antiquity, if we 
 would give ourselves the pains to look for them. They 
 seem no less discernible in the Architecture of Greece, 
 than in the other sister arts, of two of which (Music and 
 Painting) we shall have occasion to say a few words by 
 and bye. But here let me explain myself; for I would 
 not be misunderstood. The transcendent beauty of 
 Grecian Architecture, I am the last to call in question. 
 Further, that the ancients were endued with a natural 
 sense of rhythmical beauty, (and I suppose rhythm is that 
 which gives form to Music), so painfully acute and ex- 
 quisite that it is scarcely comprehensible to us, this also 
 must be cheerfully admitted. And again, that not only 
 their statues, but even their public edifices were externally 
 decorated with colour, this curious phenomenon we like- 
 wise allow, and concede to antiquity. But what I wish 
 to point out is, that there was a certain falling short in 
 each and all of these several departments which nothing 
 but Christianity (a new creation) was able to supply. 
 Let the character of the architecture of a Grecian temple, 
 for instance, be compared with that of a Gothic cathedral. 
 It will be felt that there is a profoundness of sentiment 
 about the latter, of which the coldness of the Greek 
 is wholly destitute. The soaring column, and bowing 
 arch, and dim long-drawn aisle; the deepest tones of
 
 STATUESQUE SPIRIT OF ANTIQUITY. 27 
 
 Music; the subdued splendours of Painting: in 
 Christianity all these combine their mingled utterance: 
 all the creatures of God, so to speak, do here seem to 
 render Him their united homage. The Church, as Christ 
 re-edified it, had a spell which could evoke them. 
 
 And I am not afraid of being thought fanciful, if I sug- 
 gest, as a further very striking illustration of the coldness 
 of antiquity, another deficiency, or short-coming, which, 
 Christianity also first supplied. I allude to the fact that 
 the ancients do not appear to have known the sentiment 
 which we call Love. Woman, as it would seem, never 
 attained (or regained) her lawful position in society, till 
 the intervention of Christianity; until " the angel 
 Gabriel was sent from GOD unto a city of Galilee, named 
 Nazareth." So long as the female sex remained de- 
 graded, this feeling, which may be regarded as a Gothic 
 passion, could not exist : and so long as mankind fol- 
 lowed the light of Nature, as it is called, (by which, 
 I suppose, is meant the scarcely perceptible reflection 
 of the light of Revelation), so long must the female 
 sex have remained degraded. Aristotle, I think, com- 
 monly classes women, children, and brutes together ; and 
 when "the sex" is mentioned in poetry, it is commonly 
 in some disrespectful or disparaging way. Let a heroine 
 of Tragedy speak for herself : the allusion is to her 
 lord:- 
 
 6 ' etTre Trpo? fie /Sat", del B' vftvov/jieva' 
 " <yvvai, <yvvaif;l Koa/nov r) auyr) <f>epei." * 
 
 The tone of Hector's address to Andromache is indeed 
 
 * Soph. Aj. 292 3. Cf. (Ed. Col. 1115 : and Frag. 61, and 
 perhaps 102 : but especially ^Esch. Ag. 914 6. Sophocles has 
 a beautiful passage on the life of Woman, Frag. 517.
 
 28 COLDNESS OF GREEK TRAGEDY. 
 
 touching ; but the world was five hundred years younger 
 when Homer wrote. 
 
 At all events, whether the Greeks knew what Love was, 
 or not, they had no word in their language (a lan- 
 guage not particularly deficient in names for things) to ex- 
 press it.* $t\ia, (piXijcris, evvoia, o/juovota, cnopytj, etc., as 
 we all know, mean things very different. As for epa)?, 
 which man shares with the brute creation, it would not 
 need to be mentioned at all, were it not unhappily the 
 only word for Love in the Greek language. As might 
 have been expected, we accordingly find nothing like the 
 romantic passion in ^Eschylus or Sophocles ; except, 
 perhaps, that we are just reminded of it by the little 
 passage between Hsemon and Antigone: rather touch- 
 ing, it must be confessed ; especially that description of 
 the dying youth, 
 
 .... 69 vypv 
 ' er 6fjL<j>pQ)V 7rap0ev<*) TrpoffTTTVffae'ra^ K. T. X. 
 
 But such an exception really only serves to prove the 
 rule. If the thought had ever entered the heart of one 
 of those old dramatists, they would never have written as 
 they did. We call it " the passion," as if there were no 
 other : they never mention it, as if it were no passion 
 at all. "Single-speech" Pylades never gives us a hint 
 of what he is thinking about, while Electra and his friend 
 are talking at Agamemnon's tomb ! The only remark 
 he does make, as far as feeling is concerned, might have 
 
 * The Romans were, of course, worse off than the Greeks. 
 Cicero's phrase for " rivalry in love" is Contentio uxorice 
 conditionis. (Uxoria conditio ! ! !)
 
 EXUBERANT GENIUS OF THE GREEKS. 29 
 
 proceeded from Launce's "pebble-hearted cur": but 
 about Electro, ovSe ypv. 
 
 To speak seriously, (and to dismiss trie subject), it is 
 almost affecting to notice what the result of all this was. 
 Men sought for sympathy and kindness in Friendship ; 
 and hence the endeavours of the ancients to reduce Friend- 
 ship to a system ; hence the prominent place this sentiment 
 occupies in their writings ; hence the two Books which 
 Aristotle has devoted to <f>i\ia ; hence many of the specu- 
 lations on the relative social duties of the members of a 
 TroXt? ; and hence the treatises which have come down to 
 us, on this subject. These may, in some sense, be con- 
 sidered as filling that space in the literature of antiquity, 
 which the romantic novel has filled in the literature of 
 modern Europe. But this is a digression for which I 
 ought to apologise. To return to the matter more im- 
 mediately before us. 
 
 Lastly then, in illustration of the Analogy we seek to 
 establish, it may be suggested that a spirit, uniformly 
 prolific, pervades and ennobles all the works of anti- 
 quity. The three hundred plays ascribed to the exuberant 
 genius of the three great tragedians of Greece, remind 
 one of that lavish prodigality of artistical skill which is 
 so striking in a collection of ancient coins; amid many 
 thousands of which, it is scarcely possible to recognise 
 any two specimens that are quite alike. Both classes 
 of works are in their particular way unrivalled, and 
 stamped with immortality : both are but imperfectly un- 
 derstood: both require long study, in order to be at all 
 felt or appreciated. Again: as in the language there 
 arise such delicate discriminations of meaning, such 
 exquisite points of beauty, depending often on the collo- 
 cation of a word, or the nice insertion of a particle, so 
 is it with fine Art. Its "condensed construction" defies
 
 30 GREEK LITERATURE AND GREEK ART. 
 
 criticism: the essence of expression, in either case, evapo- 
 rates in the attempt to analyse it: its felicity may be felt 
 but cannot be explained ; and can no more be found out 
 (either in Literature or Art) by an apparatus of critical 
 rules, than the beauty of a landscape can be accounted 
 for by a diagram, or the bloom on a cheek by a lancet. 
 
 But enough has now been said on this subject, and I 
 may be growing tedious. Such, at all events, are some 
 of the analogies which may be pointed out (how many 
 more may be felt!) between Greek works of Literature 
 and Greek works of Art. What has been said has been 
 thrown out rather in the way of suggestion than intended 
 for the formal discussion of a question with which, deeply 
 enamoured as one may be, one is but imperfectly ac- 
 quainted. The sum of all amounts to this. If the con- 
 nexion we have been insisting upon does really exist, 
 why are the two subjects so effectually sundered? Why is 
 a man urged to toil on for ever in one department, and 
 never allowed the help and the solace which he might 
 derive from a practical acquaintance with the other? 
 
 However, I can well imagine some one remarking on 
 what has gone before, " There may be some truth in 
 all this; but the analogies you point out, however real, 
 are not very important. Young men at Oxford have 
 no time for such things ; and if they had, it is not to be 
 expected that they would devote themselves to their 
 consideration ; and if they did, it would not help them 
 much in the Schools :" and the like. 
 
 These objections however, and others like them, are 
 grounded on a complete misapprehension of the question. 
 It is not for an instant intended that speculations, such 
 as I have hazarded, should be thrust on young men on 
 their arrival at Oxford ; nor indeed is it wished that the 
 philosophy or metaphysics of art, or by whatever name
 
 SOME OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED. 31 
 
 it should be called, should form any indispensable part of 
 the educational system of the University. Still less is it 
 contemplated that hours which are claimed by severe and 
 definite studies should be wasted in dreamy guesses at the 
 riddles of Antiquity : and it is not apprehended that the 
 season required for exercise and relaxation would be 
 interfered with, by the seductions of a gallery of Sculpture. 
 Briefly, let it be observed, that it is with Taste somewhat 
 as it is with the Virtues, eyyivovrcu al dperal . . .Tre 
 /u,ev r)/j,iv Segaa-Ocu avras, re\eiov/j>voi<; Se Sia rov 
 No pains taken with a spirit that is not "finely touched," 
 could avail to give it a sense of Beauty, if the faculty for 
 apprehending beauty was denied it at its birth. You 
 might as well talk to a man born blind, about the Car- 
 toons ; or to a deaf man, about an Oratorio. Men often 
 escape from a discussion on sounds by declaring they have 
 no ear. It is a far more common (though less suspected) 
 defect to have no eye. A gallery of Art would therefore, 
 after all, appeal not to the many, but to the few : and it 
 would be but a mute appeal. Further, it will be admitted, 
 I think, by those acquainted with the subject, that there 
 is little fear of men being drawn away unduly from the 
 study of Languages, or History, or Philosophy, by the 
 seductive allurement of ancient Art. A laborious course 
 of classical study, once entered upon, supposes an amount 
 of resolution, and energy, and principle, which will not 
 be easily perverted. If the seductions of modern Litera- 
 ture, of poetry and romance, and of such elegant 
 pursuits as are open to us all in this place, as drawing, and 
 music, and architecture, prove ineffectual, surely the 
 dead language of Art will plead in even less persuasive 
 
 * Aristot. Eth. Nic. ii. 1. 3.
 
 32 REQUIREMENTS OF A GALLERY OF ART. 
 
 tones. Truly, its beauty lies not on the surface. It may 
 not " unsought be won." It has nothing to attract 
 withal, and much to repel. One proof may suffice. Let 
 any one attempt to enumerate how many of our country- 
 men have proved able interpreters of the mind of antiquity, 
 as it is to be found in the not-literary remains of anti- 
 quity. They may be almost enumerated on the fingers 
 of one's two hands. 
 
 I take the liberty of supposing that by the time you 
 have read thus far, you will desire to hear me state in 
 express words what monuments those are which I desire 
 to see in the Taylor gallery ; and what the advantages 
 which I suppose would actually accrue from their posses- 
 sion : for I am aware that I have been vaunting the 
 interest and importance of the study of ancient art to one 
 who will not differ from me in opinion on the subject. 
 It is particularly agreeable to me to be thus precise. Were 
 I less conscious of the goodness of the cause I am plead- 
 ing, it might be safer to keep to generalities, and write a 
 rhetorical essay, instead of a plain earnest appeal : but 
 the duty before us is definite, the monuments themselves 
 capable of enumeration, and the chief advantages to be 
 derived from their acquisition neither difficult to discover, 
 nor inconsiderable. 
 
 What then are the grandest existing sculptures, not 
 of antiquity alone, but of any age, any clime ? We need 
 no prophet to tell us that these are the sublime creations 
 with which Phidias enriched the pediments of the Par- 
 thenon at Athens ; the astonishing fragments of which 
 Lord Elgin brought to England in 1803, and which are 
 now deposited in the British Museum. To enter at 
 any length into the history of those objects, would be 
 foreign to the purpose of this letter : to expatiate on
 
 THE WORKS OF PHIDIAS. 33 
 
 their merits, would be presumptuous : to explain them, 
 is beyond my ability. It has been attempted by many, 
 and achieved in a manner altogether satisfactory by 
 none.* It will be quite enough for us to remember that 
 they were the finest work of the best artist of the first 
 city of Greece, achieved when that city had attained its 
 highest pitch of glory. Pericles suggested Phidias 
 execiitedf the Islands of the ^Egean and the con- 
 federate cities of Asia Minor paid for them. What more 
 need be said ? When the mighty mind of Greece first 
 felt its greatness and its power, then it was that she cre- 
 ated those works. And can we forget that all this took 
 place at the period when the prophetic canon came to a 
 close ; that the Almighty Voice was now on the eve of 
 being withdrawn from men, and Its divine accents were 
 not to be heard on earth for a second period of four 
 hundred years ? It was then that Providence commis- 
 sioned uninspired wisdom to take up the thread of the 
 world's History ; and allowed the human intelligence of 
 Greece to exhibit those marvellous phenomena of wis- 
 dom, imagination, and energy, philosophical, literary, 
 and aesthetical, which in our admiration and wonder we 
 sometimes call by a figure of speech " divine." The 
 
 * Among the chief names connected with this subject, are 
 those of Visconti, Col. Leake, and the late Chev. P. O. Brondsted . 
 I look back with much pleasure and gratitude to some happy 
 hours passed among the Elgin marbles with the last named 
 learned antiquary and most indulgent friend. His theory 
 concerning those compositions, which he had made his par- 
 ticular study, and to which he brought the stores of profound 
 and varied scholarship, enlisted the sympathy of all, even of 
 those who entertained a somewhat different opinion as to the 
 particular attribution of some of the statues. 
 
 f Tlavra t ^tetTrc icai irai-ruv t/rtWoTroe i\v ai/rw Ofi^t'ae- 
 Plutarch, Vit. Pericl. (quoted somewhere by Dr. E. Clarke). 
 
 D
 
 34 THE AGE OF PHIDIAS. 
 
 struggle with Persia first made Athens conscious of her 
 nobility ; her resources, physical and intellectual ; her 
 exceeding greatness. Then ^Eschylus, and soon after, 
 Sophocles wrote verse, and Thucydides wrote prose. 
 Then too it was that Phidias achieved those immortal 
 sculptures which have (in part) survived the wreck of 
 nearly twenty-three hundred years. How does it happen 
 that while Thucydides, and jEschylus, and Sophocles 
 are read by so many, the works of Phidias are read by so 
 few ? But to continue. 
 
 The circumstances which give such peculiar interest to 
 the Parthenon marbles, and indeed set them above all 
 other extant specimens of ancient sculpture, deserve a 
 brief enumeration. They are these : we know their pre- 
 cise date:* we are informed, not only of the school 
 from which they proceeded, but of the master by whom 
 they were (certainly in part) executed : their locality is 
 determined, not only geographically, but in the temple 
 itself; and hence we know their use or intention : and 
 Pausanias has recorded the subject (no longer recognis- 
 able, except with the aid of his brief notice) of the two 
 pediments which they filled: the eastern represented 
 the birth of Athene, the western the contest of Athene 
 and Poseidon for the soil of Attica; when the former 
 called the Olive into being. Who but remembers, while 
 he reads these words, those Xa/iTrpa eV^ of the poet 
 of Colonus, wherein he recites the chief glories of his 
 native land in strains as imperishable as the subject of 
 his praise? 
 
 * " The construction and completion of the Parthenon is to 
 be attributed almost entirely to the eight years occurring be- 
 tween 446 and 437, B.C." Col. Leake's " Athens and Demi," 
 vol. i. p. 462.
 
 SCULPTURES OF THE PARTHENON. 35 
 
 There is too, hereabout, such plant as I, 
 
 to Asia's land belonging, hear not of; 
 
 nor in the mighty Doric Isle of Pelops, 
 
 ever of old! the scion of the soil, 
 
 unconquerable uncreate ; the terror 
 
 of foemen's spears ; which on this plain of ours 
 
 flourisheth most; the grey-leaved, the nutritious Olive! 
 
 Yea, and another vaunt have I, the gift 
 
 of the mighty god to this maternal soil, 
 
 most glorious, to rehearse: her proudest boast! 
 
 how blest in steeds, how blest in colts, how blest upon the main. 
 
 Hail son of Kronus, (for 'twas thou that didst 
 
 uplift her to this boasting), lord POSEIDON ! 
 
 when for the steed the salutary curb 
 
 first in these streets of ours thou didst contrive. 
 
 Faithful it is hoped; but how poor and cold it sounds! 
 as indeed all literal translation of such poetry must of 
 necessity be. Assuredly of these marbles, no less than of 
 the chorus whence these verses are taken, we may exclaim 
 in the words of the great poet last quoted, /*e79 eV 
 TOVTOIS 0eo9, ovSe yrjpdaKei. 
 
 A series of casts from these marbles then, one and all, 
 I claim for Oxford. Not the wrecks of the statues from 
 the Pediments alone, but the beautiful frieze represent- 
 ing the Panathena'ic procession; and the Metopes, each 
 allusive to Attic story; together with those other frag- 
 ments (more or less considerable, and some of surpassing 
 beauty*) which recent excavations at Athens have lately 
 brought to light. This, in point of importance, is the 
 first set of objects which imperatively claims our notice. 
 
 Inferior in interest, as everything else must be, we 
 must not fail to remember in this place certain other 
 
 * Casts of these have recently been received from Athens, 
 and lie in the Elgin Room. There is among them a Victory 
 fastening on her sandal: a small bas-relief, but so splendid!
 
 36 THE FLORENTINE, PHIGALEIAN, 
 
 very important series of marbles which are to be referred to 
 about the same period ; the casts of which should be found 
 in an adjoining room, and which the student should con- 
 template in connection with the marbles of the Par- 
 thenon. First, I would mention the important series of 
 statues (little known I fear in this country) which enrich 
 the Museum of Florence ; and which had always been 
 recognised as representing the story of Niobe and her 
 children : but which it was reserved for a countryman of 
 our own, first to throw valuable light upon. Mr. Cockerell, 
 (the accomplished Architect of the very gallery whose 
 cause we are pleading), with his accustomed fine perception 
 of the meaning of ancient art, has shown that these marbles 
 constituted the contents of the pediment of some forgotten 
 temple in Greece or Asia, whence, at some remote period, 
 they must have been carried to Italy. The Royal Aca- 
 demy is happy in the possession of a complete set of these 
 casts ; and a restoration of the Pediment, etched by Mr. 
 Cockerell himself, now lies before me, which makes one 
 sigh for a sight of the original. 
 
 And next, let me remind you of the fine sculptures in 
 bas-relief (also in the British Museum) which are known as 
 the Phigaleian marbles. They formed the frieze of the 
 temple of Apollo at Bassae, near Phigaleia in Aicadia; 
 and were discovered in 1812, by C. R. Cockerell, Esq., and 
 John Foster, Esq., in company with three foreigners. 
 They represent the battle of the Centaurs with the La- 
 pithae, and of the Athenians with the Amazons. 
 
 We must remember, that to the same period of Art as 
 the Parthenon marbles (whether a little earlier, or a 
 little later, we cannot tell : it is a vexata qiuzstio, and does 
 not materially affect our present object) belong those 
 five or six draped female statues which Sir C. Fellows 
 brought from Xanthus two or three years ago, and which
 
 AND XANTHIAN, MARBLES. 37 
 
 are all in the British Museum; being temporarily de- 
 posited in the little room which connects Egyptian with 
 Athenian art.* I will not detain you with any remarks 
 upon these works ; but you are perhaps aware that some 
 of them, one especially, the female figure with a dove at 
 her feet, are of extraordinary merit. In short, they are 
 fine specimens of a fine time ; and should not be entirely 
 separated from the relies we have been enumerating. 
 
 I take leave of this period with reminding you of the 
 grandest female statue in the world, the Venus of Melos. 
 In connexion with this wonderful work, Millingen men- 
 tions the Venus of Capua ; and considers both as ancient 
 copies of two transcendent productions which belonged 
 to this the finest time of Art. You will find them both 
 engraved in the second series .of his " Ancient Unedited 
 Monuments"; and to the work of that truly learned an- 
 tiquary and lamented friend, I would refer you for further 
 particulars concerning them ; but we may be allowed to 
 suggest a doubt as to the non-originality which he im- 
 putes to the first named statue. One remark may be 
 allowed in passing. Both exhibit the goddess half un- 
 draped, a peculiarity which enables us to assign the sculp- 
 ture to a period subsequent to the age of Phidias. There 
 was a maidenly modesty in the mind of early Greece 
 which shrunk from the merest semblance of indelicacy. 
 Accordingly, the primitive representations of the female 
 form are covered up to the neck. In my Father's collection 
 of Terra-cottas from Melos, now in the British Museum, 
 there was a little female figure, seated, and holding a dove ; 
 (with a smaller one at its side, which is represented with 
 a lyre). It was very ancient, indeed of the earliest 
 
 * Transferred, since this was written, to a room, (not yet 
 open to the public), which is devoted to the Lycian Marbles.
 
 38 PERIODS OF ANCIENT ART. 
 
 style of Art: but though the personage intended was 
 Venus, the drapery was so disposed that nothing but the 
 left breast was visible. It was reserved for a more licen- 
 tious age, and a change in manners which Thucydides 
 comments upon, and in morals, which the great comic 
 Poet has not failed in every page to reprove, to introduce 
 an innovation in this respect. We may here observe how 
 Art exhibits, reflected as in a mirror, the social changes 
 of the period to which it belongs. The archaic age, 
 mindful of the sanctity of beauty, carefully conceals the 
 person*: the second period of art withdraws half the 
 concealment, and exhibits loveliness 
 
 OVKT K 
 
 8eSop/c<w? veoyd/Aov 
 
 the third period withdraws it entirely. Thus the earliest 
 female statues carefully conceal the entire person. The 
 Venus of Melos is an example of the second period, and 
 is half exposed. The Venus de Medici is perhaps as fine 
 a specimen as could be found of the third period ; and 
 she is entirely naked. But this is to anticipate. 
 
 We divide Greek history, for different purposes, 
 whether consciously, or unconsciously, into periods; and 
 I have already hinted at three : one of which very dis- 
 tinctly precedes that now under consideration. It is of 
 the second of these, (which may be considered, in round 
 numbers, to extend over the space of very nearly two 
 centuries), that the Parthenon marbles, as already sug- 
 gested, form so magnificent an exponent. The Persian 
 war (B.C. 490), and the era of Alexander (B.C. 330), seem 
 obviously to suggest themselves as the limits of this 
 
 * Sec the remonstrance of Gyges to Candaules, Ilerodot. i. 8 ; 
 and the remark which Herodotus himself makes at the end of 
 c. 10.
 
 ^EGINETAN MARBLES. 39 
 
 splendid period, the moments of the acme" of the second 
 and third empires, moments memorable in a historical, 
 a social, and a literary, point of view : and shall we be 
 surprised to find that the memorable changes which were 
 going on in these several departments, made an impression 
 also on Art ? Nay, rather let us expect here to discover 
 the most striking indication of those changes. 
 
 I revert to the first of the three great periods hinted at : 
 a period, which, whenever we may choose to consider it 
 to have begun, ended with the Persian war. We arc 
 anxious to find some statues, a series if possible, dis- 
 tinctly referable to this early age ; and of all the treasures 
 lost to us, one such series has happily been preserved. 
 Allusion is of course made to the contents of the two 
 Pediments of the temple (called) of Jupiter Panhellenius, 
 at JEgina, a collection of statues, which Messrs. Cockerell 
 and Foster (with a Bavarian traveller, named Linkh,) 
 were so fortunate as to discover when they were en- 
 gaged in excavating, in order to measure the said temple, 
 in 1811. 
 
 A few words concerning the history of these statue.s 
 shall suffice. Their subject is a matter of some uncer- 
 tainty. Whether it be a passage in the history of the 
 ^Eacidse, as one would have thought probable on d 
 priori grounds, or whether it represent the combat 
 between Hector and Ajax over the body of Patroclus, as 
 the marbles themselves would rather incline one to 
 believe, remains open for discussion. The fragments ot 
 twenty-five statues were found, in all: of which Mr. 
 Cockerell is of opinion that eleven occupied the western, 
 and fourteen the eastern pediment. The latter bear the 
 marks of highest intelligence. You will find a very ex- 
 quisite etching of these monuments, accompanied by a
 
 40 ARCHAIC ART. 
 
 brief memoir, both by the last-named accomplished 
 friend, in the periodical work cited below.* 
 
 These two series of marbles then in particular, those 
 namely from jEgina and those from the Parthenon, claim 
 our foremost attention. Both are of the highest order of 
 merit ; but they are great in different ways, embodying 
 the spirit of two different ages. Of the second series, 
 enough has perhaps been said. The first exhibits the 
 archaic features of art in a most interesting manner. 
 The limbs have a peculiar rigidity, which reminds us that 
 marble was a material of comparative novelty. They are 
 clearly imitations of older works ; and the heads, particu- 
 larly, may perhaps have been copied from originals in 
 wood. .In all the figures there is a vast deal of spirit and 
 power, but they are all singularly conformed to an archaic 
 archetype. The crisp short curls, the scrupulous fidelity 
 of conventional details, the quaint complacent smile on 
 every facef, peculiarities which every one can discern, 
 but hardly describe, and which cannot be understood 
 without a reference to the works themselves, all this 
 gives individuality to these marbles, as the expression of 
 a certain period of Greek History, and claims for them a 
 high place, the very highest, in our regard. This series, 
 we need not add, is indispensable to our gallery. 
 
 In calling the Mgma marbles archaic, and claiming for 
 them such prominent attention, it is only meant that they 
 exhibit the spirit of the archaic period of art in its very 
 perfection, that is, when it had attained its highest 
 beauty. You see genius struggling for expression, but 
 
 * Journal of Science and the Arts , No.xii. (London, 1819), 
 p. ,327. and Addenda. 
 
 -j- This singular and agreeable expression is recognisable on 
 the early coins of Athens, Corinth, and some other cities.
 
 THE HEROIC AGE. 41 
 
 it is struggling in fetters : you feel that you are on the 
 eve of a great change, but that change has not yet arrived. 
 When we look at the Parthenon, we are immediately 
 made conscious that the change has come. The old he- 
 roic age had then departed, and for ever. But the marbles 
 of ^Egina are, of course, no fair exponent of the heroic age 
 of Greece. Of this age we lack adequate monuments. 
 I suppose, besides the lions over the gate at Mycense, no 
 sculptures of the Heroic age are extant ; and that the 
 Cyclopean remains of Mycenae, Argos, Tiryns, and a 
 few more towns, are the only existing relics of the age 
 of Homer. Amid this dearth of materials, we must be 
 content to cite the Harpy-tomb which Sir C. Fellows has 
 lately brought from Lycia, as the best and perhaps the 
 earliest extant specimen of a primitive time. It was pro- 
 bably executed about the seventh or eighth century before 
 our era ; and is preserved, as you are awaie, in the British 
 Museum. One would, of course, desire to possess a cast of 
 this very interesting monument, the exact locality and 
 
 use of which are fortunately so well known Another 
 
 memorable piece of sculpture referable to this first period 
 of art, is the singularly archaic fragment which the 
 learned friend I have already quoted, first introduced to 
 the notice of English antiquaries. The original, which was 
 found in Samothrace, is deposited in the Louvre; and a 
 cast might be easily obtained. In the meanwhile I subjoin 
 the reference to his work*, which should find a place 
 in every College-Library, as it does in our own. 
 
 Of the same period it may suffice further to mention 
 (as easily made available to us) the well-known metopes 
 found at Selinus in 1823, casts of which are in the 
 
 * Millingen's Ancient Uned. Monuments, 2nd Series, pi. 1, p. 1.
 
 42 SELINUNTINE SCULPTURES. 
 
 British Museum*; the originals being deposited in the 
 Museum at Palermo. These sculptures, which have no 
 beauty, but are highly interesting and important, may be 
 seen engraved in the folio publication of their discoverer, 
 Mr. Angell. They are uncouth representations, derived as 
 usual from ancient myths; as the death of Medusa, one 
 of the adventures of Hercules, and the like. The frag- 
 ments are numerous, but the perfect groups are but 
 three. These however are, in their way, quite unique. 
 They must be seen to be understood; and studied to be 
 appreciated. 
 
 A third great epoch, that namely, which succeeds 
 the age of Alexander the Great, remains to be noticed. 
 We now find the barriers broken down which had so long 
 fenced in the holy ground of public faith and public feel- 
 ing : and a corresponding change is discernible in art, 
 a change which continued rapidly on the increase, till that 
 general dissolution of things prevailed which ushered in 
 Christianity; and, under Providence, paved the way for 
 its rapid dissemination. At the beginning of the period 
 under review, the physical investigations of the earlier 
 schools of philosophy recede, and at last disappear before 
 the metaphysical acuteness of Plato, and the free ration- 
 alism of Aristotle. On referring to the page of Greek 
 History for some further illustration of a curious problem , 
 we are reminded of the Indian expedition of the Mace- 
 donian conqueror, by which Greece first became exposed to 
 the influence of the Oriental philosophy; and a mighty 
 shock must have been inevitably given to the prejudices 
 of so lively, so polite, and so susceptible a people. We 
 
 * Mr. Angell informs me that this is the only set of casts 
 from these marbles in England. From these, however, casts 
 would be easily procurable.
 
 WORKS OF THE THIRD PERIOD. 43 
 
 arc further reminded of the teaching of the sophists, and 
 the first inroad of the subjective into the objective world. 
 It is a memorable fact that Alexander the Great is the 
 first human personage whose portrait appears on coins. 
 Accordingly, as might have been expected, we now begin 
 to find a mixture of the human with the divine in other 
 monuments also : and shall find in the remark just offered 
 a clue to much unwelcome novelty, and many apparent 
 irregularities. I am not aware of any grand series of 
 marbles which are referred to this time: but as we 
 descend in the scale of history, our monuments, whether 
 in Art or Literature, increase in a rapid ratio. The great 
 artists and the great authors have disappeared; but the 
 inferior performers in either department have multiplied 
 innumerably. The difficulty noAV consists rather in selec- 
 tion. We shall not, at all events, err, in calling particular 
 attention to such detached groups and single statues as 
 the following: the Laocob'n: the dying gladiator: the 
 gladiatorial figure sometimes called Brasidas at Amphi- 
 polis : the Diana of the Louvre : the Discobolus : the well- 
 known figure of Cupid bending his bow : the figure called 
 the Genius in the Vatican : the Farnese Hercules : the Flora 
 of Naples: and those three beaiitiful, well-known works 
 which formerly engrossed almost exclusive admiration, 
 the Venus de Medici, the Belvidere Apollo, and the Anti- 
 noils. It is considered that some of these, particularly 
 the three last named works, are of a late time ; perhaps 
 referable to so low a period as the age of Hadrian; but 
 that they are copies of older works, works, as old perhaps 
 as the age immediately succeeding the age of Alexander. 
 The Apollo is considered to be an imitation of a bronze 
 statue ; and there are many peculiarities in the treatment of 
 that fine work which irresistibly recommend the suggestion 
 to our acceptance. The third figure (the Antinoiis) is
 
 44 ADVANTAGES OF SUCH A GALLERY 
 
 probably the copy of a Mercury, with the portraiture of 
 the favourite whose name it bears. In short, an attentive 
 consideration of the matter leads us to the painful con- 
 clusion, that of the original statues of antiquity extremely 
 few are extant: and in this period of Art, the last which 
 we shall pass under review, a splendid copy of a lost 
 original is probably that which wins our highest praise. 
 But this is by the way, and something of a digression, 
 though it is hoped not a tedious one. 
 
 It need scarcely be remarked, that my wish has rather 
 been to produce a sketch than to exhibit a finished design : 
 to suggest, not to prescribe. This faint outline therefore 
 of the requirements of an University is all that I shall 
 presume to offer. It must be superfluous to add that 
 much has been passed over, wittingly. In specifying the 
 ^Egina marbles as a type of the first epoch of ancient 
 Greek sculpture, I am not forgetful of the fact that many 
 other fragments might be found belonging to the same 
 time, and which would well deserve being contemplated 
 side by side with them : the same may be said of the 
 works enumerated as specimens of the second; and especially 
 of the third, which is perhaps the least instructive, period : 
 least instructive, that is to say, to such students as would 
 frequent a gallery of antiquities in Oxford. Each period 
 would also conveniently admit of further subdivision. 
 My object, I trust, has been made sufficiently plain. It 
 remains, however, to illustrate a little more fully, the 
 advantage such a collection of monuments would be to 
 an University. 
 
 And surely, after what has been already directly 
 observed or indirectly suggested, much need not be said 
 in addition to convince such persons as, I am willing to 
 hope, will be induced to give these pages a patient reading, 
 of the importance of a Collection like this to the classical
 
 TO THE CLASSICAL STUDENT. 45 
 
 student. The sculptures of JEgina would be to him the 
 Herodotus, those of Athens, the Thucydides of art. The 
 union of archaic simplicity with consummate know- 
 ledge and skill, the touches of pathos combined with 
 the utmost life and spirit, and I may add the quaint 
 smile on the faces of the one set of marbles : the severe 
 dignity, the condensed truth and grandeur of the other, 
 remind me irresistibly of the characteristics of the two 
 great Historians of antiquity. But even if this were not the 
 case, were there the utmost apparent discrepancy between 
 these two sets of contemporary monuments, there would 
 remain a great many advantages, or, as one may say, uses; 
 enough to recommend these marbles to the most matter-of- 
 fact person imaginable. To take those from the Parthenon, 
 for example: who, let me ask, can read the 13th chapter 
 of the 2nd book of Thucydides, that passage namely, 
 wherein Pericles is spoken of as alluding to the very 
 marbles in question, without an impatience to turn and 
 gaze on the works themselves? But it would be endless 
 to particularise. A thoughtful person could not live in a 
 city which contained such a series of objects, without 
 becoming in some degree affected by them; and if his 
 memory were stored with the literature and institutions of 
 the people by whom they were produced, he would soon 
 learn to yield them his homage, and he would receive in 
 return their silent teaching. He would insensibly imbibe 
 the spirit of antiquity, if he might stand, at leisure 
 moments, amid such relics; and it is to be supposed that 
 by studying in the same school as Miiller and Heeren, (but 
 under happier auspices), his apprehension of their lessons 
 might be sharpened; thedryness and coldness of their 
 scholarship and criticism relieved; the materials for 
 original thought and speculation supplied; somewhat of 
 the German enthusiasm for antiquity engendered without
 
 46 ANCIENT ART SHOULD BE STUDIED. 
 
 its unintelligible mysticism : somewhat of its indefatigable 
 spirit of research, without its miserable infidelity; and 
 the strange phenomenon be no longer witnessed, of learned 
 men, when they leave our Universities, perplexed at the 
 sight of the monuments of the very people whose litera- 
 ture they know so well: with whose institutions, and 
 history, and manners, they are familiar; but with whose 
 immortal works of Art they are as unacquainted as with 
 the monuments of central America, or of Japan. The 
 most perplexing passages in the classic writers they have 
 completely mastered, or at least fairly met : the subtleties 
 of Greek thought and expression, they have made their 
 daily study: but the rhythm of Art the language of 
 those old Greeks who wrote their thoughts on Pentelic 
 marble, these remain as great a mystery as the languages 
 of Persepolis and of Etruria. We are bold to assume, 
 as a general position, that ancient Literature and ancient 
 Art are naturally connected ; and should never be entirely 
 separated; that to understand either, one must study 
 both: that even so, it will be found quite hard enough 
 to acquire an adequate notion of the spirit and mind of 
 antiquity: but that to understand the one thoroughly, 
 without studying the other at all, is utterly impossible. 
 
 A few words more, in illustration of the uses of a 
 
 Gallery of Art will best be offered when I have completed 
 my sketch. 
 
 Not to -delay you too long, I will next suggest that to 
 render complete such a collection as we could wish to 
 possess in Oxford, the works of great modern Artists should 
 not be altogether excluded. It may suffice to particularise, 
 of mediaeval art, the stupendous creations of Michael 
 Angelo; his Moses, for example: and I would beg 
 especially to remind you of the unfinished marble group 
 by his hand, now in the possession of the Koyal Academy.
 
 CLAIMS OF MODERN ART. 47 
 
 It represents, in high relief, the Blessed Virgin the 
 Infant Saviour and St. John Baptist. No words can 
 express the sublimity of this composition. Once seen, it 
 can never be forgotten. And a cast of it may be obtained 
 
 for thirty shillings ! I have said nothing about the 
 
 wonderful Italian school of Sculpture which preceded the 
 age of Michael Angelo, simply because I know nothing 
 beyond the fact that there was such a school. 
 
 To descend at once to modern times; if, after the 
 Taylor gallery had admitted all the works we have 
 alluded to, room were still found for more, one would 
 be quite willing to admit a single specimen of the works 
 of great modern sculptors : a single specimen of the skill 
 of Flaxman, in whom the awful grandeur of antiquity 
 revived ; of Thorwaldsen ; of Canova ; of Chantrey ; of the 
 Westmacotts ; of Gibson ; and a few more names. But 
 instead of all this, what have we? No .^Egina marbles, 
 no Parthenon marbles ; none of the wonders of ancient, 
 
 none of the glories of modern art: nothing but a room- 
 ful of plaster casts from Chantrey's statues ! ! ! And these, 
 
 neither historical compositions, nor statues of our great- 
 est Worthies ; but, in the majority of instances, funereal 
 monuments of little great men : the melancholy effigies 
 of mothers, or maidens who died before their time, or 
 soldiers, or statesmen: funereal monuments, by the way, 
 which do not even teach us the lesson which it properly 
 falls within the province of monumental sculpture to 
 convey. Our fathers felt that the departed had gone 
 to their saint's rest: so they folded their hands meekly 
 across their breasts in prayer ; as the fittest posture for a 
 living man, and the only fit posture for a dead one. But it 
 is a well-known fact that we are wiser than our sires ; and 
 the whole of Christendom seems to be of the same opinion. 
 Bishops (whether of Rome or of any other see) retain their
 
 48 MODERN MONUMENTAL SCULPTURE. 
 
 episcopal thrones. Our departed statesmen (unquiet 
 spirits !) still harangue the house. Our philosophers cleave 
 to their professorial chairs. All seem to " die hard." Our 
 heroes cannot sheathe their swords and ' ' take their rest 
 with their martial cloaks around them ;" but still clutch 
 their weapons, and stand up among cannon-balls and 
 muskets : or clap their hands upon their thighs, and stare 
 coldly at you in stone ; clinging to what Gibbon calls 
 " the insolence of health ; " and looking as if they wanted 
 to convince you that " a living dog is \_nof\ better than a 
 dead lion." * 
 
 It is absurd to argue that because these casts have been 
 given us, that therefore they must be accommodated : still 
 more absurd to suppose that they ought of necessity to 
 find room in, or rather to fill, the principal apartment of 
 the Taylor Gallery ; what if other great sculptors were to 
 leave us the casts which filled their ateliers ? Must room 
 be found for them too ? Must the rest of the building be 
 choked up ? But this is an uncongenial topic, and I 
 gladly abandon it. It is a painful and an ungracious thing 
 to speak as if in disparagement of a great artist, (which 
 is indeed alike foreign to my purpose and disposition), or 
 to seem ungrateful for an intended favour : but it is yet 
 more painful to see so famous an University exposed to 
 the risk of being misunderstood by all Europe, (for what 
 is done here, is not done in a corner): and this it is 
 which has suggested the boldness of this letter. 
 
 * Among several beautiful exceptions to these remarks, 
 I have particular pleasure in calling to mind some of 
 the works of Sir Richard Westmacott (as the monument of 
 the Due de Montpensier in Henry VII. 's Chapel), and of his 
 son, with whom I am quite sure the criticism here hazarded 
 will find favour. The proofs Mr. Westmacott has given of his fine 
 feeling for Christian Art are neither few nor inconsiderable. A 
 monument to the Earl of Hardwicke is one of many instances 
 which occur to my remembrance.
 
 PROLIFIC GENIUS OF THE GREEKS. 49 
 
 But I must seem forgetful of the subject proposed for 
 consideration at the outset. Form and Colour were men- 
 tioned as a great and neglected means of education. Of 
 Colour not a word has been said ; and I have spoken of 
 Form, as if it were only to be seen in Sculpture, and in 
 ancient sculpture too. In thus narrowing the ground 
 however, we have acted advisedly. Mutatis mutandis, it is 
 easy to apply what has been said to any other department 
 of art, ancient or modern : and our remarks have been 
 restricted to the Sculptures of ancient Greece, because these 
 seem to present most attraction, and offer most advantages 
 to the student. Waiving, for the moment, any allusion 
 to Colour, it is imperative on us to remark, however, that 
 it is to do great injustice to Antiquity to speak of its 
 sculptors alone ; as if we had forgotten the claims of its 
 artists in gold, and silver, and bronze, in precious stones, 
 and in clay, or terra cotta. The genius of Greece seems to 
 have been inexhaustible, for ever developing some fresh 
 combination of the beautiful elements which it had at its 
 command. Horace* has expressed this sentiment with his 
 usual liveliness, in a passage which I fear you will hardly 
 recognise in the following English dress ; or perhaps I 
 should say dressing-gown, for the translation is a very 
 loose one : 
 
 Keleas'd, at last, from dread of Persia's king 
 When Peace o'er Hellas wav'd her ruffled wing, 
 How fast and fair the gentler Arts arose! 
 She train'd the steed: she grac'd the public shows: 
 Now, taught the Comic muse to tread the stage: 
 Now, bade the actor storm with Tragic rage: 
 With stubborn metal wag'd a noble strife, 
 And watch'd the marble struggle into life: 
 
 * Horat. Epist. ii. 1. v. 93 102. 
 E
 
 50 AN APOLOGY FOR THE 
 
 Or Beauty's image labour'd to recall, 
 And hung, enfaptur'd, on the pictur'd wall.* 
 And, as a wayward, wanton child at play 
 Changes its pastime with the changing day ; 
 Tires of the rapture each new toy supplied, 
 And flings, impatient, each new toy aside; 
 So thou, fair Hellas, in thy youth wast fain 
 To take fresh flights in Fancy's bright domain : 
 Range ev'ry field of Truth and Beauty o'er, 
 Exhaust its treasures, and still pine for more ! 
 
 The Coins f of the ancients are a class of monuments far 
 too important to be passed over unnoticed here. They 
 even challenge the foremost place in a gallery consecrated 
 to Art ; and, in a public University, those claims acquire 
 tenfold force and reality. Not that we can hope to feast 
 our eyes upon the coins themselves, for it would cost too 
 many thousands to secure a collection sufficiently exten- 
 sive, and sufficiently beautiful, for our purpose. A fine 
 set of casts in sulphur is all that can be hoped for ; but 
 these might be secured for a very insignificant sum. 
 Classed in geographical order, with a subsidiary chrono- 
 logical arrangement, and disposed in flat cases about the 
 level of the eye, so that the specimens (both obverse and 
 reverse) might be examined in a good light through 
 glass, what an insight into the History, the Mythology, 
 the Art of Sicily and Magna Graecia Greece Proper, Asia 
 Minor, Syria and Egypt, would be attainable by the 
 merest tyro ! I scarcely dare trust myself on so seductive a 
 
 * " Suspendit picta vultum mentemque tabella." 
 
 f The mention of ancient coins seems to suggest the fittest 
 opportunity for an acknowledgment, as sincere and hearty, as 
 I feel it must be brief. If there be any single sound view of 
 Antiquity contained in these pages, I have derived it, con- 
 sciously or unconsciously, from one of the best of living anti- 
 quaries my Father. The mistakes, (whatever they may be), 
 are private property, and altogether my own.
 
 STUDY OF ANCIENT COINS. 51 
 
 theme: so pregnant with interest, so important, yet 
 enjoying such limited popularity. Under whatever light 
 we contemplate these beautiful little monuments, we are 
 struck with their surpassing value and importance. The 
 invention of coinage is contemporary with the beginning 
 of civilised society in Greece : the series only ends with 
 the extinction of the Roman Empire. Throughout that 
 long period, the history of each country is engraved on 
 its coins; those of each city become a fragmentary 
 chronicle of that city. What history attests, that coins 
 corroborate. Is history silent ? the coins still speak. 
 They tell of leagues formed with distant states: they 
 commemorate victories:* they bear witness to periods of 
 grandeur and decay : they indicate the change of lan- 
 guage, the progress of colonization, the haunts and the 
 seats of commerce, and the vicissitudes of empire: they 
 preserve the memory of local worship : they exhibit 
 ancient localities:! they present us with the portraits of 
 emperors, tyrants, kings, queens, and other illustrious 
 personages; so exquisite, that modern art cannot ap- 
 proach them: so truthful and striking, that we should 
 recognise Alexander the Great, Seleucus, Antiochus, 
 Ptolemy, or the Caesars, if we could meet them, a great 
 deal better probably than we should our own Shakspeare. 
 
 * None perhaps more touchingly than those large brass coins 
 struck by Vespasian and Titus, and inscribed IVD^EA CAPTA : 
 which represent the daughter of Sion sitting mournfully on 
 the ground beneath her palm. 
 
 t A coin of Neapolis (now Nablous) the ancient Sychcm, 
 or Sychar, struck by Antoninus Pius represents that temple 
 on Moiint Gerizim which the woman of Samaria alluded to 
 when she said ol iraripeg fifiwv if rnvra) ry opei TrpoaeKvvrjaai-. 
 A copper coin of Athens represents the Theatre of Bacchus at 
 the foot of the Parthenon. Another represents the Acropolis 
 itself. These, though rare cases, are by no means solitary 
 examples of localities actually pictured on coins.
 
 52 ANCIENT COINS. 
 
 Going have a literature of their own. They may be 
 regarded as little leaves cut out of the great volume of an- 
 tiquity, consigned to the winds and storms of more than 
 two thousand years, and at last washed up on these dis- 
 tant shores, each with its indelible, unalterable record. 
 Some present the names of forgotten cities; others estab- 
 lish the orthography of cities, well known indeed, but 
 the names of which, variously written by mediaeval 
 transcribers, have perplexed the learned.* Some are 
 interesting for their curious legends, and challenge the 
 critical acumen of the scholar.f Many kings of Bactria, 
 many kings of Indo-Scythia, unknown names, and lost 
 as it might have 'seemed for ever, have come to light 
 only within the last ten years. A handful of coins is 
 all that remains of a mighty dynasty ! J 
 
 Then, had Coins no other attraction, their singular 
 beauty, the glory of the conceptions indelibly stamped 
 upon them, enough sometimes to make the heart ache 
 with a sense of their loveliness ! might surely rescue 
 them from the neglect in which they have slumbered so 
 
 long Much injustice has been done by individuals 
 
 to the different pursuits with which they are not them- 
 selves acquainted ; but on no pursuit has more preposterous 
 ridicule been heaped than on those of the Antiquary. 
 The Philosopher flatters himself that he soars, while the 
 
 * Dr. Arnold, I think, alludes to this in three or four places, 
 in his notes to Thucydides : e.g. iv. 75 (KaXKijSwv). He was 
 anticipated, in this practice, by Dr. Cramer, who generally 
 inserts a notice of the ancient orthography of ancient towns, 
 in the notes to his Geographical works. 
 
 t Take for example the inscription on a coin of Miletus, 
 which Millingen has published in his Sylloge of Ancient lined. 
 Coins, 4to. London, 1837, p. 70, viz., EF AfAYMilN 1EPH. 
 
 \ See Professor Wilson's learned and interesting work, en- 
 titled " Ariana Antiqua," 4to. London, 1841.
 
 THE ANTIQUARY. 53 
 
 Antiquary creeps: the Historian, that he is dealing with 
 great things, while the Antiquary is playing with toys : the 
 Poet that he gathers the fruit, while the poor Antiquary puts 
 up with the stalk and leaves : the Naturalist, that if he be 
 himself a trifler, he is at least trifling with the works of 
 Nature, while the Antiquary is trifling with the works of 
 Man ; and so of others. (As if tadpoles, and torn-tits, and 
 cabbages were necessarily a more elevating subject of 
 study than Man, and Man's ways: the cunning workman- 
 ship of his fingers: his yearnings after perfection!). 
 It may be that Antiquaries themselves, or rather pretended 
 Antiquaries, have had their full share in promoting this 
 delusion. An illegible inscription, a rusty old sword, 
 found by no-body-knows- whom, no-body-cares- where, 
 a Queen Anne's farthing, a copper coin with nothing 
 upon it, a pipkin of red earthenware,* destitute of either 
 spout or handle, all these are deemed the peculiar pro- 
 perty of the Antiquary. One hears it sometimes gravely 
 stated that antiquaries admire things " because they are 
 old." How often must it be repeated, that nothing is to 
 be admired but what is beautiful, that nothing can be 
 beautiful which is not good ? I dismiss this slight digres- 
 sion by appealing to the coins of Magna Graecia in support 
 of my assertion, that ancient coins exhibit sometimes the 
 
 * Or such a thing, for example, as may be seen inserted into 
 the wall of an Iiin by the road side, near Waltham-Cross, in 
 Hertfordshire ; surmounted by the words VIA UNA. It seems 
 that a mansion once stood there, belonging to the Cecil family ; 
 whose motto is " Cor unurn, Via una" Amid the foundations 
 of the house, a rude earthen vessel, (such as, two centuries ago, 
 the lower orders seem to have used for beer), was discovered, 
 along with the latter-half of the family-motto wrought in stone. 
 The inference, though not quite logical, was irresistible. The 
 allusion was evidently to Watling-street ; and the Inn rejoices 
 in the sign of " The Roman Urn " to this day.
 
 54 INTEREST AND IMPORTANCE OF ANCIENT 
 
 very highest order of artistical skill; and would particu- 
 larly call attention to those of Syracuse, Agrigentum, 
 Caraarina, Tarentum, Metapontum, Terina, Thurium, 
 Heraclea in Lucania, Crotona, and Velia. Nor am I 
 apprehensive of the result, if you will refer to the plates 
 in Noeh den's Specimens of ancient Coins, engraved at the 
 suggestion of Canova, from the princely collection of that 
 distinguished patron of the Arts, Lord North wick. 
 
 What then is wanting to recommend the study of this 
 class of monuments? What additional argument need be 
 urged to show the advantage of a set of casts to the clas- 
 sical student? Can any one read Thucydides without 
 wishing to see coins of Athens and Sparta? and who but 
 will be struck with the coinage of the former city; who 
 but will be led to some curious reflexions by the absence 
 of all coins of the latter? How interesting to such a 
 reader become the coins of the allies of either state ! 
 those of Plataea, to cite a single example, How real be- 
 comes the narrative in b. vi. c. 4, when, at a certain period 
 in the series, the legend ceases to be Zancle* and becomes 
 Messana instead! With what interest one looks at the 
 Lydian coins after reading the first book of Herodotus! 
 Will the portraits of Mithradates,| of Pompey, of Julius 
 and of Augustus Caesar, of Tiberius and of Germanicus, 
 of Cicero, of the many illustrious ladies of Imperial 
 Rome, be valueless to the student of Roman history and 
 literature? But I must be growing tedious. Only one 
 remark shall be added; and it shall be expressed in 
 general language, for the argument applies to every 
 branch of ancient monuments, though it is by no means 
 in a slight degree applicable to coins. They would 
 
 * See a paper on this subject by my Father, Num. Chron. 
 vol. iii. p. 40. 
 
 t This uarne is invariably so spelt on coins.
 
 MONUMENTS TO THE CLASSICAL STUDENT. 55 
 
 deserve our best attention then, in this place, were it only 
 because they present us with such lively Representations of 
 ancient Objects. Instead of contenting ourselves with the 
 second-hand descriptions of men who never saw the things 
 themselves; or putting up with the representations of 
 such miserably ill-selected specimens of antiquity as are 
 sometimes presented to our notice, why should we not 
 rather make it our honest ambition to contemplate the 
 monuments themselves: to derive our notions from the 
 fountain-head ? For this purpose, we should find copies 
 of the subjects of ancient Vases especially valuable. How 
 lively a notion of a Greek warrior is derived from a Greek 
 frieze, or vase, or coin: his helmet, his round shield, 
 his offensive weapons. With regard to the second, how 
 intelligible, for the first time, becomes the epithet 7roS^/wy<? : 
 how interesting the description of its device or CTTI 0-77/40 v ! 
 What a commentary on countless passages in classic writers 
 becomes the actual representation of ancient costume; of an 
 ancient ship ; and still more, of an ancient car : the avrvj;, 
 the ^705, the pv(j,6$, the earwp : to say nothing of the 
 trappings of the steeds. The Panathena'ic amphora which 
 my Father found at Athens in 1813, and which has been 
 so often published, exhibits, on its reverse, a two-horse 
 car and its charioteer, of the sixth, or perhaps even the 
 seventh, century before our era. Where else shall we turn for 
 such an early representation ? And, without it, how vague 
 
 must our notion of the scene depicted be ! Take 
 
 domestic implements again, (if the term be allowable): 
 the tripod, the lyre, the torch, a vase, a strigil, 
 a mirror, a chair: domestic scenes, as a marriage, a 
 hunting-party, or a feast : public scenes, as a chariot-race, 
 or a combat : the heads, or the statues, of ancient deities 
 with their accessories, and the several objects sacred to
 
 56 SUCH STUDIES NOT TO BE NEGLECTED 
 
 them : above all, the ancient modes of representing ancient 
 myths. Why, in conclusion, let me most earnestly ask ; 
 why, with all this in our reach, are such objects as un- 
 known among us as if no relic of Antiquity had survived 
 the stormy flight of twenty centuries? Fiercely indeed 
 has that storm raged; and few, comparatively, are the 
 relics which it has spared : yet, even in their ruins, most 
 lovely are they, one and all ; and, like the precious stones 
 of earth which Plato beautifully dreamed of, as the 
 fragments of a brighter world above us,* they speak 
 eloquently of an intellectual creation such as we seem 
 destined never to behold again. Christianity has lent 
 us angels' wings: has sanctified, and therefore ennobled 
 Art beyond all expression : has discovered a new Architec- 
 tural World; and in the harmonies of Sound and Colour 
 has conducted us into regions never explored by antiquity : 
 but, in her peculiar way, Greece yet remains it may be, 
 
 must ever remain unrivalled Why do we keep these 
 
 treasures from ourselves? How long are we to be 
 deprived of such high gratifications? What is to be the 
 limit, in the age of the individual, or the history of this 
 place, to which we are to deny ourselves the advantages 
 which, for a sum too trifling to be considered, might be 
 made available to us all? 
 
 I suppose that every one must have been occasionally 
 impressed with the almost unsurmountable impediments 
 which stand in the way of a complete appreciation of the 
 classic writers. Not to mention the mystery of the idiom, 
 arising so frequently from the circumstance that their 
 compositions were in tended for the ear, and not for the eye : 
 not to mention the difficulty, perhaps the impossibility, 
 of translating a dead language into a living one; to 
 * Phado, p. 110. I).
 
 WHILE SO MANY DIFFICULTIES REMAIN. 57 
 
 understand them/M%, we need to have felt their faith, and 
 used their laws, and shared their lives ; or, at all events, to 
 have lived in their land, and in their times; to have looked 
 upon the same blue mountains and sea through the 
 same pure atmosphere : to have been familiar with all their 
 various sights and sounds : to have seen their faces, and 
 heard their voices, and breathed their air, and eaten their 
 food. Without any such associations, how darkly do we, 
 how dimly must we gaze into Antiquity through the 
 medium of a dead language ! Some such conviction as 
 this is often forced upon us by a speech, a chorus, a 
 dialogue, the individual remarks or the reflexions of an 
 ancient author. Still oftener, particular passages present 
 difficulties which remind us of the disadvantages under 
 which we labour. A few examples, selected at random, 
 will sufficiently illustrate what is here intended. Thucy- 
 dides refers in a well-known passage* to the Athenian 
 practice of wearing a peculiar head-dress, adorned 
 with golden rerr^e? : and Aristophanes has several 
 allusions to the same ancient fashion. We refer to the 
 scholiast on both writers, and find, Bia TO fMovcriicbv, rj 8ia 
 TO avTo^dovaf elvai-, assigned as the reason : /cal <yap TO <wov 
 7777eve5. But we have always been allowed to translate 
 T6TTt|, grasshopper; and since that insect is neither 
 " musical," nor in any particular sense " indigenous," the 
 passages in question are, I suppose, not generally under- 
 stood : or rather, the reasons assigned by the scholiast do 
 not appear quite satisfactory. But every Athenian must 
 have been familiar with the allusion, and felt its appo- 
 siteness. The large winged insect which the Greeks 
 called T6TTt^, the Latins cicada, and the modern 
 Italians cigala, (but for which we have no name), when it 
 * B.i. c.6.
 
 58 DIFFICULTY OF FULLY UNDERSTANDING 
 
 escapes from the chrysalis, which was deposited in the ground, 
 flies up with tuneful wings, out of the earth under the very 
 feet of the traveller, the offspring, as it would indeed 
 seem, of the soil. What fitter type could have been selected 
 of a race who deemed themselves avro^6ove<; ?. . .^Eschylus 
 calls the misery which war inflicts SiXoyxpv drtjv. 
 These two \6yxcu are truly enumerated by the com- 
 mentators, viz. public and private woe. But who does 
 not perceive that this is only half the explanation which 
 the phrase requires? The very best commentary on the 
 passage is the ancient representation of a Greek warrior, 
 armed with two spears. This, it will be felt, makes the 
 metaphor intelligible in a moment. JEschylus would 
 
 never have said rp {\oy%ov The Bovpios opviQ of the 
 
 same poet, Ag. 112; and the einnepov opviv of Sophocles, 
 (Ed. Tyr. 175, would, in like manner, be best illustrated 
 from monuments: nor would any youth, who had once 
 been shown the representation alluded to, again think of 
 
 translating the latter phrase, " a well-fledged hen" A 
 
 multitude of similar examples might perhaps be recol- 
 lected, if it were worth while. Aristophanes, in particular, 
 is full of allusions which we cannot explain.* It will be 
 perceived that the exquisite chorus in the (Edipus Coloneus 
 already quoted, should, in order to be understood, be read 
 with the recollection in our hearts that the Parthenon 
 over-hung the Theatre of Bacchus where the play was per- 
 formed : that itsPediments exhibited the theme of the poet's 
 song executed in Pentelic marble by Phidias: and that 
 a single gesture of the Coryphaeus would have sufficed to 
 
 * In a single play of his, how many occur! In the Knights, 
 for example, the following lines strike one as all requiring 
 further elucidation v.630: 815-6: 901: 1103: 1180: 1175-6: 
 1270-1, etc.
 
 THE ANCIENT WRITERS. 59 
 
 render all the poet's meaning clear: (though this, as 
 we all remember, was not at all necessary before an 
 audience who, when they heard their own praises, under- 
 went such lively excitement, that as their fellow-townsman 
 and satirist told them to their faces, they could " hardly 
 keep their seats" eV d/cpwv TWV TrwytSww etcddyaQe}.* 
 Then, to all this we must add the balmy air, the bright 
 lights and shadows, the temple itself kindling in the 
 morning sunshine, and the distant sight of Salamis 
 and the sea; and we seem to have a faint glimpse, at 
 least, of what we ought to experience, in order to under- 
 stand what an Athenian felt, what the poet of Colonus 
 intended that his hearers should feel. Now, to say no- 
 thing of the Stygian darkness which, in addition, hangs 
 over the pronunciation of Greek poetry, the lost charm 
 of its metre, and of its musical and orchestric accompani- 
 ment, do we not at once perceive how thick a veil hangs 
 between a single chorus and ourselves? How dim, and 
 vague, at best, our notions of Antiquity must be? Once 
 more then, we shall surely feel that no legitimate method 
 of dispelling that gloom is to be neglected : and it is 
 hoped that what has been urged will suffice to show that 
 the contemplation of ancient Monuments themselves, or 
 faithful copies of them, is at once the simplest and the 
 most valuable. 
 
 Enough has now been said about Form ; too much 
 perhaps: and yet I have carefully abstained from any 
 theoretical views of ancient Art; or from looking deeper 
 into its analogies than the matter in hand seemed to 
 warrant. This may be reserved for some more conve- 
 nient opportunity ; when further reading and observation 
 
 * Aristoph, Acharn. v. 638.
 
 60 EOI TAS APXA2. 
 
 has enabled me to systematise opinions only disconnect- 
 edly held at present; and to trace more distinctly the 
 complicated outline by which the works of Antiquity 
 using that term in its very widest sense are circum- 
 scribed: provided always that more precious claims 
 should not make such an occupation unlawful ; provided 
 too that I am not anticipated by some more able pen.* 
 On the subject of Colour, no less than on the subject of 
 Form, "if I were as tedious as a king, I could find in my 
 heart to bestow it all on your worship ; " but a salutary 
 check shall be imposed. As already remarked, I have 
 spoken of Art practically, not theoretically; and of the same 
 character shall be the remarks which remain to be offered. 
 I leave that other view of these matters, that, namely, 
 which I believe has been called the philosophy (or, as 
 others have preferred to call it, the science) of Art, to those 
 who have the taste and the ability for such investigations. 
 In other words, I abstain from beginning with such in- 
 quiries as that concerning the abstract principles of Beauty ; 
 but, in humble imitation of some illustrious examples which 
 shall be nameless, placing myself at the other end of 
 the scale of intelligence, and hoping, in time, to arrive 
 at the Universal by means of the Particular, with the 
 monuments before me, I desire to look up to the Beau- 
 tiful through and from them; and to consider what 
 advantages their study seems calculated to confer. 
 
 You will, I am sure, excuse me, if I here venture to 
 offer an opinion, differing from that which, till you 
 
 * I find with pleasure that something of the kind is contem- 
 plated by Charles Newton, Esq., of Christ-Church, now of 
 the British Museum, one of the few friends with whom, in 
 discussing these subjects, I have found on the whole a singular 
 coincidence of sentiment and general opinion.
 
 ESTIN H OAOS. 61 
 
 did me the favour to explain your meaning more fully, 
 I conceived you yourself held on this subject; namely, that 
 it is wholly impracticable to convey a knowledge of the 
 arts of Sculpture and Painting on synthetic principles. In 
 this respect, these arts seem to differ in some degree from 
 the sister art, Music : and this, perhaps, is the reason why 
 the last named has, in all ages except the present, been 
 selected as an integral part of an academical course, 
 namely, because it admitted of something like scientific 
 teaching : because, (as you have yourself pointed out 
 from Aristotle), " the etSr) rov Ka\ov, in other words 
 the necessary conditions of art, raft?, Koi av^erpLa^ Kal 
 TO a)pi<rfAvov" are distinctly recognisable in it. That 
 the mysteries of Form and Colour are referable to certain 
 fixed laws, and that the types of aesthetic Beauty are as 
 immutable in their nature as the ap%ai of morals them- 
 selves, / make no manner of doubt. But, whatever the 
 4 line of beauty ' may be, it has never been discovered : and 
 the theory of Colour, even if there exist one worthy of 
 being scientifically taught, (of which I humbly confess 
 myself profoundly ignorant), must belong, one should 
 think, rather to the science of Optics, than to the study of 
 Art. It is feared that to one predisposed to the abstract 
 and a priori investigation of such questions, all that has 
 been here written must have a very material air, and be 
 singularly distasteful : but, deeply impressed with the 
 soundness of my position, I am bold to think that, fairly 
 considered, its general correctness will be admitted. Let 
 me hope, at all events, that I am not misunderstood to 
 speak slightingly of that confessedly higher view of the 
 subject which I judge that you are disposed to take, as 
 well from the conversation you have occasionally favoured 
 me with on such topics, as from the thoughtful paper
 
 62 ADO TON APXQN. 
 
 you read before the Ashmolean Society " On Education 
 in the Principles of Art." It is, of course, a matter of 
 deep wonder to find that the harmonies of Colour, and 
 the harmonies of Sound, depend on " contemporaneous 
 vibrations, addressed in the one case to the sense of sight, 
 and in the other to the sense of hearing." Very remark- 
 able, too, is the coincidence you point out in the absolutely 
 perfect concords, and the primitive forms of colours: 
 namely, that they are but three. To find the mystery of 
 Trinity in Unity thus reflected on the creatures of GOD 
 must ever be delightful, and deeply affecting to a well 
 constituted mind; and I feel grateful for being reminded 
 of any instance of it. The Atomic Theory has long since 
 reduced Chemistry to a science of Number ; and the pro- 
 gress of experiment will probably extend the claims of 
 Number to be a kind of summum genus : so that Philosophy, 
 in its old age, seems to be only verifying the guesses of its in- 
 fancy, under Pythagoras. All these, I grant, are marvels, and 
 well deserving study and attention : but I do not see how, 
 by such abstract investigations, we shall make any approxi- 
 mation to the great and definite end, which I am never- 
 theless well persuaded we both equally have in view. 
 
 We shall perhaps be told, then, that if these things can- 
 not be thus taught, they are not fit subjects /or the atten- 
 tion of an University : but such a sweeping denunciation 
 is not to be tolerated, and may be replied to in several 
 ways. First, though it should prove impracticable to 
 teach them synthetically, it does not therefore follow 
 that they cannot be taught at all. Next, even if they 
 defied all systematic teaching, it would not therefore 
 follow that they should labour under utter neglect : the 
 KO\OV may be worth contemplating for its own sake; 
 and, be it remembered, that the organ which makes us
 
 WHY TASTE SHOULD BE CULTIVATED. 63 
 
 acquainted with it, is that organ which " converses with 
 its objects at the greatest distance, and continues the 
 longest in action without being tired or satiated with 
 its proper enjoyment."* Further, whatever our rulers 
 may see fit to decide in this place, the plain matter of 
 fact is, that a man no sooner leaves Oxford, than he 
 inevitably finds himself thrown, day after day, among 
 these forms of real or apparent beauty. No less if he stays 
 at home, than if he goes abroad, whether he understands 
 the subject, or whether he does not, is he called upon to 
 express an opinion ; and very often to make his election. 
 A man may as well attempt to escape from the responsi- 
 bility of Moral action as from the exercise of his Taste. 
 He is assailed, wherever he turns, and is daily called upon 
 to act : the alternative in every case being between acting 
 right and acting wrong. Finally, as you have yourself 
 most truly remarked, " where different Arts appear to 
 be entirely distinct from each other, they are still held 
 together, if not by relations of direct resemblance, yet by 
 certain laws of analogy" : or, as some one else has said, 
 " Etenim omnes artes quae ad humanitatem pertinent, 
 habent quoddam commune vinculum, et quasi cognatione 
 quadam inter se continentur" : and it will follow that 
 the cultivation of one, indirectly prepares the heart for 
 the reception of another; or rather, ensures an un- 
 conscious acquaintance with all the rest: just as in 
 the Aristotelian system of Ethics, the possession of 
 <t>p6vr)<Tt,<; ensures the possession of all virtue. Hence the 
 ancients fabled the Arts to be Sisters, by wedding 
 one of whom, you find yourself brought into close rela- 
 tion with all the others. And, for our present purpose, it 
 seems worth adding to your own remark this further 
 * Addison. Spectator, No. 411.
 
 64 THE FINE ARTS ARE LINKED TOGETHER. 
 
 one, namely, that Beauty is one and the same every- 
 where ; though, from the nature of the case, it assumes 
 innumerably different aspects: and therefore, to speak 
 practically, that a soul which has once imbibed a thorough 
 sense of what is beautiful in any one department, will be 
 furnished with a faculty which will serve as a guide in 
 every unforeseen occasion ; and enable a person to decide 
 rightly, on the whole, in every case that may happen to 
 present itself, however anomalous it may appear to be. 
 For there is a Right and a Wrong in every thing; there 
 is harmony or rhythm, though it may defy analysis, even 
 in the furniture of a room, the hanging of a picture, 
 the proportions of a chalice, the arrangement of a 
 garden. Such questions seem to occupy the same kind 
 of relation to Art, which cases of Casuistry occupy towards 
 Morals. A person learned in such subjects could give 
 off-hand a great many curious examples, or rather proofs, 
 of the wonderful chain which binds the Fine Arts to- 
 gether, and links the small with the great. It occurs to 
 me that Phidias, who made the chryselephantine statue 
 of Minerva, the wonder and admiration of the ancient 
 world, thought it no indignity to execute a fly ; or a 
 fish; so natural, that it was said of it, " Give it water, 
 and it will swim." A curious instance of his mechanical 
 ingenuity is also recorded. Michael Angelo, equally 
 great in Sculpture and in Painting, built St. Peter's, 
 fortified Florence, and wrote poetry. Raphael's inex- 
 haustible genius condescended to the embellishment of 
 the walls of the Vatican with merely ornamental details. 
 Leonardo da Vinci was as famous for his knowledge 
 of Architecture and Sculpture, as for his skill in Painting : 
 he was celebrated too as a musician, mathematician, and 
 engineer; and by a marvellous instinct, anticipated the
 
 EXAMPLES OF THIS. 65 
 
 truths which it was reserved for a late, age to establish. 
 Petrarch was one of the earliest collectors of ancient 
 coins. " The Tuscan artist," (lie who viewed the moon 
 " through optick glass,") dwells on his high obligations 
 to Ariosto, whose works he perused constantly; and was 
 himself a poet and a critic.* Some time since, I happened 
 to meet with a most exquisite episcopal seal, that of 
 Richard de Bury, bishop of Durham in the reign of 
 Edward III. I felt sure that it could have been no 
 common person who had left such a memorial of his 
 taste, in so small a particular; and on inquiry, it proved 
 that this bishop had been Tutor to the King, Lord Chan- 
 cellor of England, and Envoy to the French capital and 
 the Papal Court: that he was the father of English book 
 collectors, and had been the friend of Petrarch. He 
 bequeathed his books to the University of Oxford, and 
 I am told that a few are still preserved in Trinity 
 College library. Holbein portrayed the nobility of 
 Henry VIII. 's court, and designed their jewellery. He 
 also painted the ceiling of the Chapel Royal. St. James's. r 
 The residence of Rubens was in itself a picture. To cite a 
 living instance, all who have been made welcome in 
 the classic residence of the author of the Pleasures of 
 Memory, remember how a taste for the finest of the fine 
 Arts seems to have introduced all the rest : till the impress 
 of a correct taste is discernible in the minutest decora- 
 tions of that beautiful dwelling. When these pages meet 
 the eye of my indulgent friend, W. R. Hamilton, Esq., 
 
 * For this illustration, and two or three similar remarks 
 in the beginning of this letter, I am indebted to my dear 
 friend, the Rev. C. P. Chretien, of Oriel. The obligations 
 which I lie under to him for his patient teaching, and kind 
 assistance in my studies, I am glad of any opportunity to ac- 
 knowledge. 
 
 F
 
 66 TAINTING, AN ART 
 
 I trust he will not be displeased with the liberty I 
 take in mentioning his name in connexion with this 
 subject. Surrounded by many a specimen of what is rare 
 and beautiful in art, he beholds the legitimate fruits 
 of his varied and elegant scholarship reflected on all 
 that meets his eye. His friends will not easily forget 
 the classical effect of the Athenian frieze which sur- 
 rounds his library at Chelsea. To judge from the well 
 known character by the Rev. Mr. Temple, inserted in 
 Mason's Life of Gray, the author of the " Elegy" seems to 
 have been a singularly apposite illustration of my meaning, 
 in the last century. But I pass on to the subject more 
 immediately before us. 
 
 Painting then, with whatever success the Ancients may 
 have flattered themselves that they cultivated it, seems to 
 be an Art of Christian growth: and I am inclined to 
 believe that, by those who have reflected on the matter 
 attentively, this will not be thought a rash assertion. 
 With the exception of the paintings discovered at Pompeii 
 and Herculaneum, which are not ancient enough to 
 gainsay our present position ; nor (as far as I can discover) 
 sufficiently excellent either, it may be said that no ancient 
 paintings have come down to us: we can therefore only 
 reason on the subject from the existing evidence, for and 
 against the claims of antiquity, which is within our 
 reach. And first, it is to be admitted that we have 
 numerous extant specimens of ancient colouring. Fictile 
 vases exhibit drapery of yelloAv, pinkish red, and blue : 
 white bodies (when females are intended), and yellow 
 hair, which in the more finished specimens has not un- 
 frequently been gilded: and perhaps another colour 
 (though I never saw an instance of it), besides black, and 
 the brownish red colour of the clay itself. Colouring, how-
 
 OF CHRISTIAN GROWTH. 67 
 
 ever, and Painting, it need scarcely be observed, are dis- 
 tinct things. The former seems a merely mechanical, 
 the latter, a very exalted and intellectual Art. The one 
 must be coseval with the first ages of mankind: the other 
 implies a very high degree of refinement and civilization. 
 Neither of these two last-named conditions were certainly 
 wanting in ancient Greece : still, as we all know, man is 
 slow to invent; and without some direct evidence to the 
 contrary, it seems just as unlikely that Painting, in the 
 modern sense of the word, was known to the ancients, as 
 that Music was. Musical notes indeed they knew. The 
 elementary principles of the science of harmony, with 
 their usual sagacity, they discovered. But that complicated 
 mystery which Christianity sought and found for its 
 utterance, of this we do believe they knew absolutely 
 nothing. To be brief, it may be presumed that the worlds 
 in which Raphael and Handel " lived, and moved, and had 
 their being, " were every bit as unknown to the ancients as 
 America or New Holland were. The stories we read of 
 Apelles and Protogenes, Parasius and Zeuxis, and the 
 like, all go to support this position. They corroborate 
 the proofs already existing in metal, in marble, and in 
 clay, that they were first-rate artists indeed ; perfect mas- 
 ters of Design ; and that they were well acquainted with 
 Colour : but by nothing that one reads is one induced to 
 think very highly of their proficiency in Painting. A 
 beautiful anecdote which has been recorded by Pliny, indi- 
 cates an extraordinary sense of beauty of form ; but three 
 fleeting lines intersecting one another on a painter's tablet 
 can have had nothing to do with the Art by which Titian 
 became immortal. And again, every one must feel that 
 many of the proofs urged in support of the pretensions of 
 the ancients, are such as to argue an almost infantine
 
 68 COPIES OF FINE PAINTINGS 
 
 state of Art. A child five years old might paint cherries 
 which a bird would peck at. Any ingenious mechanic 
 could represent a curtain in such a manner as to deceive : 
 and I suppose a horse would be just as likely to neigh at 
 a flagrant sign-post effigy of one of his own species,* as 
 if the animal had been painted by Landseer himself. 
 
 This opinion on an interesting subject, briefly ex- 
 pressed, but not hastily adopted, I have ventured to 
 offer ; chiefly to explain why, in speaking of Painting, I 
 pass at once to the Italian school, and would be understood 
 to take my stand there, in the very few remarks I desire 
 in conclusion to offer. Is it then, I would ask, too much 
 to hope that, in time, we may see the walls of some 
 building in Oxford adorned with faithful copies of the 
 grandest Pictures in the world? and might we not hope 
 that by some act of private munificence we should here- 
 after see a gallery hung with original works of some of the 
 great Masters? In the meantime, surely some of the best 
 prints of those pictures might be procured, were it only 
 such a collection as the fine taste of an individual mem- 
 ber of this University has formed for his own gratification 
 and that of his friends; I allude, of course, to Mr. 
 Johnson, of the Observatory. I have also been informed 
 that the Kector of Lincoln College is happy in the pos- 
 session of a similar treasure. The original drawings of 
 Raphael and Michael Angelo, at all events, we possess; 
 and I suppose are all burning to behold. Surely, if pictures 
 are to charm us hereafter, they should begin to charm us 
 now. If, on leaving the University, a man is expected to 
 know a Raphael from a Rubens, a Guido from a 
 Reynolds, it is surely fair to let him see a specimen of 
 
 * See Pliny, Nat. Hist. b. xxxv. c. 10. The whole chapter 
 is exceedingly entertaining and worth reading.
 
 REQUIRED IN A GALLERY OF ART. 69 
 
 those great masters, or at least of their manner, before- 
 hand. No one can study the works of Raphael without 
 improvement: no one can understand them without study. 
 They are sure to kindle the fancy, to soften the heart, 
 to exalt and purify the imagination, to mature the 
 judgment: and the rudiments of a Taste for these things 
 must be acquired early; or, in nine cases out of ten, it can 
 never be acquired at all. How many men are there, in 
 consequence, who go forth from this place as ignorant of 
 the first principles, the very alphabet (so to speak) of Art, 
 as of Chinese. How many men, heirs to high titles or 
 large fortunes ; or destined, on their leaving college, for the 
 enjoyment of noble opportunities, who nevertheless 
 miss those opportunities, abuse those great gifts : some, 
 brutally indifferent on the subject of Art: others, absurdly 
 lavish on objects undeserving of their attention ; and then, 
 unwilling to learn, or incapable of being taught the 
 egregious folly they have committed, and the worth- 
 lessness of their possessions : and in the case of such as 
 were destined for better things, how dimly and vaguely, 
 (like men groping in the dark), does one sometimes see 
 men feeling their way, and only late in life finding it; 
 after many abortive attempts, and after they have purchased 
 their experience at a price which would have stocked 
 a gallery ! 
 
 Oxford cannot, of course, be converted into a School of 
 Taste. Nothing is more remote from my wishes than that 
 it should ever become so. We are not yet, I fear, in a 
 condition even to hear Lectures delivered on Art; but 
 it is high time that some preliminary steps should be taken 
 towards such an end : and the amount of intelligence, and 
 rank, and opulence collected with in these walls, seems to 
 call imperatively for some endeavour to promote an 
 acquaintance with those works which must ever be re-
 
 70 ANTICIPATED RESULTS ON 
 
 ferred to as the models, and appealed to as the standards 
 of excellence 7ro\v)(p6viov <yap TO Ka\6v. I have endea- 
 voured in the preceding pages to explain how the 
 contemplation of such objects would go hand in hand 
 with the studies peculiar to an University education : but 
 even were this wholly problematical, it cannot be thought 
 strange that we should desire to be brought into sympathy 
 with the Sublime and Beautiful for its own sake. If the 
 ancients erected a Temple to the Charities of Life in the 
 public way,* in order that men might be perpetually 
 reminded of their social relationship, (somewhat, I 
 suppose, as Churches bearing the names of saintly holiness 
 are calculated to suggest heavenly thoughts amid the 
 strife and turmoil of politics or trade), surely we might 
 construct such a Gallery as we have been here describing, 
 in the yet more reasonable hope that the sublimest efforts 
 of Genius would occasionally awaken some sympathy, 
 even where they failed to stimulate inquiry, or to kindle 
 emulation. 
 
 But, in addition to all these considerations, it is 
 observable that in every department, if men are not assisted 
 and guided by those whose position and acquirements 
 qualify them to assist and guide, they will infallibly assist 
 one another and guide themselves. We have but to look 
 around us to be convinced that there exists in this place 
 a strong yearning for Art : which only wants direction, in 
 order that it may be made available for a high purpose. 
 These indications, however, such as they are, are indica- 
 tions of an untutored taste. The incongruities one daily 
 witnesses are a proof of this; and it seems no unfair 
 supposition that the mind of the individual is to be seen 
 reflected in the apartment he inhabits. In other words 
 
 * Aristot. Eth. Nic.v.5, 7. (A learned Friend reminds 
 me that the Stagyrite uses xP' here in an ambiguous sense.)
 
 THE TASTE OF UNDERGRADUATES. 71 
 
 that the state of a room and the style of its decorations is 
 an indication of the condition of the intellectual chamber 
 of its occupant. That a young man, supremely ena- 
 moured of the excitement of the chase, should hang his 
 hunting-whip or a pair of spurs over his mantel-piece, 
 and feast his eyes on a gaudy coloured print of Reynard 
 in extremis, that " Breaking cover," " Leaping a fence," 
 and " Tally ho!" should send him into exstasies, may 
 provoke a smile, but should not create surprise. I cannot 
 believe, however, that were a little attention bestowed on 
 the subject now before us, were ever so little pains taken 
 to cultivate and improve men's tastes, I cannot suppose 
 that such ill -selected specimens of Art as one sometimes 
 sees, would be so eagerly sought after: or that so incon- 
 gruous an association of the Sublime and the Ridiculous 
 as some of us may have witnessed in our time, would be 
 so generally endured. How often have we seen a subject 
 of awful sublimity, as the last Supper, the Crucifixion, 
 or the Descent from the Cross, side by side with 
 what I shrink from naming in the same paragraph : some- 
 thing not absolutely bad in itself, perhaps ; but which 
 seems very bad indeed when contrasted with what is so 
 unspeakably holy. It is surely not too much to hope 
 that a healthier tone of feeling might thus be insensibly 
 imparted ; and, as a necessary consequence, that the un- 
 worthy, tasteless, and I may add, extravagant, produc- 
 tions of the day would gradually become loathed like 
 unwholesome food : while we should see them silently 
 supplanted by such noble compositions as the fine taste 
 of Dr. Hope (by a recent publication, which should be in 
 every one's hands,) has placed within the reach of the 
 poorest student in Oxford. The boast which Pericles put 
 into the mouths of his countrymen, that " they indulged
 
 72 *IAOKAAIA. 
 
 their passion for the beautiful, with economy,"* might 
 with far greater truth f be ours. We should, at all events, 
 soon discover that expensiveness is no necessary ingre- 
 dient in Beauty : but that this source of enjoyment, the 
 purest, next to the exercise of Moral Virtue, is no less 
 attainable by us all. 
 
 And thus I bring this long letter to a close; glad 
 of any opportunity to subscribe myself, with sincere 
 respect, 
 
 My dear Mr. Greswell, 
 Your much obliged and most affectionate 
 Friend and Pupil, 
 
 JOHN WILLIAM BURGON. 
 
 WORCESTER COLLEGE, OXFORD, 
 DECEMBER, 1845. 
 
 yap p.tT tvrf\i.la. Thucyd. ii. 40. 
 
 f A learned friend, and one who combines profound scholar- 
 ship with the highest antiquarian feeling, has some remarks 
 on this subject too interesting to be omitted. He is speaking 
 of the very monuments to which Pericles alludes. " That 
 which chiefly excites our wonder in these beautiful works 
 of sculpture is, that their execution is such as in almost every 
 part to admit of minute inspection, although the nearest of them 
 Avere not seen at a smaller distance than forty feet. We cannot 
 have a stronger proof that considerations of economy entered very 
 little into the calculations of Pericles, and that the Athenian 
 artists aimed at nothing short of perfection in their produc- 
 tions, and at glory for their highest reward. Having formed 
 the conception of a finished and perfect work, Phidias and his 
 scholars could not be contented with any thing short of its 
 execution. Satisfied with its being for a short time submitted 
 to the near inspection of the public, they thought it could 
 receive no greater honour than that of contributing to adorn 
 the temple of the protecting goddess, of being consigned to her 
 care, and of becoming the object of a small share of the ven- 
 eration paid to her." (Col. Leake's " Athens and Demi," vol. 
 i. p. 337). These would have been the men to build a Ca- 
 thedral !
 
 73 
 
 POSTSCRIPT. 
 
 P. S. In addition to the circumstance recorded in the 
 note to page 5, it should perhaps be stated that since these 
 pages were written, my attention has been called to the 
 fact that casts of several of the wished-for statues, already 
 exist in the Taylor Gallery. Let me remark therefore that 
 these are so few, and they are disposed in such a way, 
 that nothing which has been here urged is in the least de- 
 gree invalidated by the circumstance. The portions of 
 the Panathenaic and Phigaleian friezes which are inserted 
 in the wall just below the ceiling, however tastefully intro- 
 duced, and admirable in an architectural point of view, 
 are not calculated, at that elevation, to answer the re- 
 quirements of a Student of Art. 
 
 Q
 
 IINIV, 6F ;;,; 
 
 -33 ANGELES 
 
 LONDON : 
 
 PRINTED BY J. WERTHEIMER AND CO. 
 CIRCDS PLACE, FIKSBURY CIRCUS. 

 
 A 001 232 902 5