ON FORCE, ITS MENTAL AND MORAL CORRELATES; AND ON THAT WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO UNDERLIE ALL PHENOMENA: WITH SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM, AND OTHER ABNORMAL CONDITIONS OF MIND. BY CHARLES BRAY, AUTHOR OF THE " PHILOSOPHY OF NECESSITY," THE " EDUCATION OF THE FEELINGS," ETC. " He who, believing that the search for truth can never be offensive to the God of truth, pursues his way with an unswerving energy, may not unrea- sonably hope that he may assist others in their struggle towards the light, and may in some small degree contribute to that consummation when the professed belief shall have been adjusted to the requirements of the age, when the old tyranny shall have been broken, and the anarchy of transition shall have passed away." Lecky's History of nationalism. "In the present state of science, of all subjects that on which we know least is, perhaps, the connection of our bodily and mental nature, the action of the one on the other," &c. Professor the Rev. Baden Powell. "Metaphysics revolve in an endless circle of abstractions, ethics have scarcely made any permanent advance since the introduction of Christianity." Time's, January 1st, 1866. " All our conceptions are based on the implied postulate that the world is as it appears. * * * The advance of knowledge consists in the substitution of accurate conceptions for natural ones." Man and his Ihcelling Place, by James Hint on. " It remains for philosophers to place Physiology and Mental and Moral Philosophy in the same position as positive science reached by induction." If. G.Atkinson, F.G.S. " Men rarely recount facts simply as they happened, but mingle their own opinions with them ; more especially if the facts are above their comprehen- sion, and connected with religious interests." Spinoza. "There are few delusions that a man cannot be brought to believe if they injure neither his stomach nor his purse." Times, April 27th, 1863. " If the Critic speaks, it is not to tell the reader what the Philosopher thinks, but what he thinks of the Philosopher : a quite uninteresting matter." Fortnightly Review. LONDON : LONGMANS, GREEN, READER, AND DYEE. THE RIGHT OF TRANSLATION IS RESERVED. 20151S5 W. P. TAUNTON, PBINTEB, COVENTBT. PREFACE. THE doctrine of Philosophical Necessity, notwithstanding its supposed horrible tendency to sap the foundation of morals, has been elevated from the regions below, where, according to Milton, its discussion furnished fit occupation and amusement for devils only, to form the base of Social Science. Philosophical Necessity is only another name for " Law" or a fixed order of Nature in the department of Mind, and there can be no Social Science without it. This I have endeavoured to make plain in my work on " The Philosophy of Necessity," and it is my purpose now to show that the doctrine of the Con-elation and Persistence of Forces, when thought out to its legitimate consequences, gives us a Science of Psychology based on Physiology, by which alone we can attain to the same command over mind, as we already have over physical force. The Irishman's direction for making a cannon, " Take a long hole, and pour metal round it," has been followed by Metaphysicians in making their canons, and the " method" IV. PREFACE. has produced results such as might have been expected. Consciousness, their round hole, has no substantial existence out of the individual mind reflecting upon it, and it is difficult to pour metal round it, and the canons so founded result only in the ipse dixit of the founder, which every succeeding philosopher thinks is necessary to burst before he proceeds to cast any of his own. Mind is force, and it must be studied as all other forces are, as well as by "reflection on conscious- ness," and then Metaphysics may take the place to which it is entitled at the head of all other Sciences. The Correlation of Forces shows that in the cycle of forces we can always return to the same starting point without a break, and the Persistence of Force shows that this is always done without loss; now these truths, not stopping short in Physics, but carried, as they ought to be, into the higher field of Mind, furnish, I think, the most probable explanation of "the Phenomena of Modern Spiritualism, " at the present time so much puzzling earnest investigators. My speculations however are given only as speculations; I have no wish to dogmatise, I merely present an hypothesis to be rejected or affirmed by observation and experience. History now has shown that we must not be deterred from the acceptance of any truth from its supposed consequences. Friar Bacon was cast into prison as a magician by the Superior of his Order, and the mysteries of physical science were treated then very much as the mysteries of mental science are now. Mr. PEEFACE. V. Lewes says, (Fortnightly Revieiv, Feb. 1, 1866), " We are warned against Materialism as cold and desolating. The real warning should be against materialism as erroneous; in point of fact, we do not find materialists are cold and desolated, any more than spiritualists are hot and happy." We must not ask then, " To what will this lead? but is it true?" No truth is really at variance with other truth, and if it should appear to be so, we must be content to wait till we understand the whole matter. We are not bound, however, to attach every new truth to some old error or superstition and then wait till we can reconcile the two, before we reason it out to its legitimate consequences: this would be to make it powerless and inoperative. Thus Pro- fessor Mansel, in the Contemporary Eevieic, No. 5, for May, 1866, says, "Eternity and continuous duration immu- tability and creation in time perfect action, yet unexhausted power to act everlasting purpose and accessibility to prayer general law and special providence complete fore-know- ledge co-existing with human freedom, we cannot combine these several elements together into a consistent whole, yet we can believe that they are capable of combination : " but I confess I find in myself no such wonderful power of belief; on the contrary, the propositions appear to me as contradictory as that a thing may be and may not be at the same time. Some of the propositions may lie beyond our depth, but I certainly cannot conceive how an occurrence can be fore-known which is contingent, that is, if man is really VI. PREFACE. free, may happen or may not happen ; neither do I feel myself called upon to believe in any such freedom, for if it really existed it would completely paralyse man's action, as there could be no prevision either in God or man. This short Treatise is dedicated to those, and to those only, who love truth above all things, for its own sake. PAGE CHAPTER I. Os FOBCE 1 CHAPTER II. FORCE; ITS MENTAL CORRELATES . . 7 SECTION 1. The Psychology of Phrenology . . 23 SECTION 2. The Persistence of Force ... 35 CHAPTER III. UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA 47 CHAPTER IV. SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM AND OTHER ABNORMAL CONDITIONS OF MIND ... 69 The Correlation of Force in Living Structures. Matter and Spirit the same in Essence. Time and Space. The Correlation of the Vital and Mental Forces. The Condi- tions attending Influx or Inspiration. Memory. SPIRITUALISM. Genuineness of the Phenomena. Appli- cation of the Theory: Physical Force, Table Moving, Rapping, Levitation, &c. Intelligence. Investigators into Spiritual Manifestations vrho have rejected the Notion of Spirits. History Confirms the Existence of the Pheno- mena. The Manifestations in the Catholic Church. "Witchcraft. The Abnormal Mental Powers of the Founders of Sects. The Constitution of the Medium. The Spirits; their Abodes and Occupations. The Rationale of the Spiritual Phenomena. The Coming Spirit World evolved from the Spirit Atmosphere, the result of Cerebration. ARGUMENT. THERE is but one thing known to us in the universe; this, Physical Philosophers hare called " Force." The Reality or Entity underlying it, or that of which it is the Force, Metaphysiciaas have called " Noumenon." It is the "Substance" of Spinoza, and the " Being " of Hegel. Everything around us results from the mode of action or motion, or correlation of this one force, the different Forms of which we call Phenomena. The difference in the mode of action depends upon the difference in the Structure it passes through ; such Structure consisting of concentrated Force, or centres of Force, and has been called Matter. " Every form is force visible ; a form of rest is a balance of forces ; a form undergoing change is the predominance of one over others." Huxley. Heat, Light, Magnetism, Electricity, Attraction, Repulsion, Chemical Affinity, Life, Mind or Sentience, are modes of action or manifestations of Force, and die or cease to exist when the Force passes on into other forms. Cause and Effect form this sequence or correlation ; and each cause and effect is a new Life and a oew Death : each form being a new creation, which dies and passes away, never to return ; for " nothing repeats itself, because nothing can be placed again in the same condition : the past being irrevocable." W. B. Grove. " There is no death in the concrete, what passes away passes away into its own self only the passing away passes away." Hegel. Force passing through a portion of the structure of the brain, creates the "World" of our intellectual consciousness, with the " ego," or sense of personal identity ; passing through other portions the world of our likes and antipathies called the Moral world ; Good and Evil being purely subjective. The character and direction of Volition depend upon the Persistent Force and the structure through which it passes. Every existing state, both bodily and mental, haa grown out of the preceding, and all its Forces have been used up in present phenomena. Thus, " everything that exists depends upon the past, prepares the future, and is related to the whole." Oersted. As no force acts singly, but is always combined with other forces or modes of action to produce some given purpose or particular result, we infer that Force is not blind but intelligent : as it is One, we infer it is the force of an intelligent Being possessing personality ; and that Being we have called God. " He is the universal Being of which all things are the manifestations." Spinoea. All force or power is Will power, the will of God. " Causation is the will, Creation the act of God." W. R. Grove. The will which originally required a distinct conscious volition has passed, in the ages, into the unconscious or automatic, constituting the fixed laws and order of nature. Vital Force exists in excess in some constitutions, and may be transferred to other living organisms, often constituting a curative agent. Brain Force, the result of cerebration, also exists in excess in some nervous constitu- tiotas ; it then forms a sphere or atmosphere around individuals by which one brain is brought into communication with others and mind becomes a unity. Individual will- power can act through thia medium beyond the range of individual body. In this way may be explained the Mysteries of Magic and Witchcraft, the Phenomena of Mesmerism, of so-called Spiritualism, and the Curative Power of Individuals. ERRATA. " THERE is nothing underlying phenomena phenomena are correlates of force, and force is all," p. 48. By this the author simply means that motion cannot be separated from the thing moving, or force or power be delegated, or separated from that which it is the force of, that is, the source of all power. " God's power," as Spinoza says, " is the same as hia essence," and all change therefore is but "the varied God." Properties, qualities, or attributes, are powers, and when said to exist per se, it is in the same sense. They have no separate existence, and are therefore untransferable. For "emotion," p. 14, line 4, read " motion." For " perception," p. 14, line 7, read " succession ; " and for "pass," same line, read " passes." For "heaps," p. 47, line 2, read "harps." In p. 67, line 3, " if" is omitted. For "assume," p. 71, line 17, read " resume." For " figures/' p. 86, line 24, read " forms." For " anthropological," p. 98, liue 27, read " anthropomorphical." For " Tyara," p. 117, line 11, read " Tyana." For "he," p. 128, last line bnt one, read " have been." For " lectation," p. 129, line 8, read " lactation." FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL AND MORAL CORRELATES. CHAPTER I. ON FORCE. NOT very long ago all the world believed that the sun went round the earth ; they saw that it did ; now all the world (with a very small exception) believes in the existence of matter ; they see it, they feel it, and that is enough. But paro- doxical as it may seem, philosophers, after the most diligent research have failed to find matter anywhere, and whereas Ave were wont to speak of the impenetrability and indestruc- tibility of matter, we now speak only of the persistence and conservation or indestructibility of Force. The assump- tion that the force which acts upon us, and of which only therefore we know anything, belongs to something else which we call matter, is gratuitous, unwarrantable, and altogether unnecessary. Heat and Light were until very recently thought to be matter, but the material theory with respect to those is now given up. Count Bumford boiled water by thumping upon iron, and Sir Humphrey Davy produced heat by rubbing two pieces of ice together. As concussion and friction therefore produced heat, heat was B 2 FORCE. thought to be not matter, but motion. But motion is nothing, it is the mere mode of action of Force and the transference of it in greater or less intensity, from one point of space to another. The heat from friction and arrested motion is merely an illustration of the persistence of force, of its varying action in different conditions, and of the transference of it from one centre of force (which we call body) to another. Heat and Light are the same, that is, different modes of action or motion of the same force, as are also electricity, magnetism, and chemical affinity; that is to say, they are correlates, and all change readily into each other without loss of quantity of the original Force. These forces, or rather this force, since all are convertible, is the source of the delusion we are under with respect to matter, when we say we see and feel it. For what do we see? Light, which is force, photographs a minute inverted image on the bottom of the eye on the retina, which acting on the Brain produces consciousness of an object. All that is known to us is the mental conception, the reality of which our conception is composed is Force. It is evident there is no matter here. But surely we feel matter if we do not see it? The sense of Feeling is mere repulsion resistance to motion. When we speak of matter as subtle, or as solid, liquid, or aeriform, we simply mean that it presents more or less resistance to motion. "When the question arises," says J. S. Mill, "whether something which affects our senses in a peculiar way, as for instance whether Heat or Light, or Electricity, is, or is not matter, what seems always to be meant is, does it offer any, however trifling, resistance to motion ? If it were shown that it did, this would at once terminate all doubt." But Resistance is repulsion or force, which acting on the sense causes a sensation; when acting on the brain, an idea. ITS DIFFEKEKT MODES OF ACTION. 8 In Chemistry we find only circles or centres of force the ultimate atoms, which this force is supposed to surround, are an uncalled for and altogether unnecessary invention. When I speak of body therefore or substance, I mean these circles of force in a more or less intense or condensed condition. The way in which force acts depends upon its relation to these bodies, or what have been called "potential energies"; going in at one end of a row of billiard balls it comes out at the other, with little or no change even in quantity, but it varies according to the com- plexity of the substance or organization through which it passes, that is, to the relation it bears to previously arranged forces. But when we speak of either matter or force we speak only of the external cause of our sensations and ideas, and these tell us nothing of the real nature or essence of either; why not then continue to use the term matter as heretofore? We answer because the more general term force may include and does really include both what has hitherto been called Matter and Spirit also. We are told that " Force viewed separately from matter is nothing." I think it more correct to say that matter viewed separately from force is nothing, because we know that force passes into or changes into mind, as heat into light, and we thus include both sides of creation Matter and Spirit. Force, in its different modes of action as Light, Heat, Electricity, Galvanism, Chemical Affinity, Attraction and Repulsion, is sufficient to produce half the phenomena around us. Life and Mind, which are correlates of Force, or other modes of its action, are sufficient to produce the other half. There is but One simple, primor- dial, absolute Force, with varying relations and conditions. The modes of Force or Effects now in existence are neither more nor less than such as have previously existed, changed only in form. They have not merely acted upon each other, 4 FORCE. according to the common supposition with respect to matter, BUT HAVE CHANGED INTO EACH OTHEE. This will be found to be a very important distinction. Each change is a new creation of something which in that form or mode has never existed before a new life, and as it passes into another form or mode, a new death "nothing repeats itself, because nothing can be placed again in the same condition : the past is irrevocable." * And may we not add irrecoverable. Motion or change is constantly producing new relations and conditions. We cannot speak of motion as existing by itself, as it is merely a mode of action of Force, and Force therefore cannot be separated from it, but must always attend it; the same may be said of all the Impon- derables, which are mere modes of action, or Force in motion. It is in this way, probably, that Force itself escapes us, because it is only with its modes or motions that we have to do: for we know nothing of Force in itself, we know it only by its effects, and when we say therefore that something takes place by the force of attraction, repulsion, electrical or chemical affinity, &c., we only mean that a certain group of phenomena occur in a certain order, and that they occur uniformly and invariably in that order. Cause and Effect are mere correlation of Force, produced by organization or the manner in which forces are concen- trated and arranged. Mr. Grove says, "I use the term force in reference to them (the affections of matter), as meaning the active prin- ciple inseparable from matter which is supposed to induce its various changes,"! But as "the various changes" are the only things known to us, why assume that they are inse- parable from matter, or that there is any matter at all ? Correlation of Physical Forces, p. 22, by W. R. Grove. + Ibid, p. 16. MATTER UNNECESSARY. 5 Again, Professor Tyndall says, " We know no more of the origin of force than of the origin of matter ; where matter is, force is, for we only know matter through its forces." * Is it not better then to dispense with matter altogether? For if all action, change, or motion, is owing to force, and it is impossible to conceive of force without antecedent force, what then becomes of matter? This doctrine of the Persistence of Force seems to me, not only to make matter altogether unne- cessary, hut to exclude even the very idea. I shall use its nomenclature therefore only as signs indicating Force. Professor John Tyndall says in the eloquent peroration to his work on Heat: " The discoveries and generalizations of modern science constitute a poem more sublime than has ever yet been addressed to the imagination. The natural philoso- pher of to-day may dwell amid conceptions which beggar those of Milton. So great and grand are they, that in the contem- plation of them a certain force of character is requisite to preserve us from bewilderment. Look at the integrated energies of our world the stored power of our coal-fields, our winds and rivers, our fleets, armies, and guns. What are they? They are all generated by a portion of the sun's energy, which does not amount to one thousand three hundred millionth part of the whole. This is the entire fraction pf the sun's force intercepted by the Earth, and we convert but a small fraction of this fraction into mechanical energy. Multiplying all our powers by millions of millions, we do not reach the sun's expenditure. And still, notwithstanding this enormous drain, in the lapse of human history we are unable to detect a diminution of his store. Measured by our largest terres- trial standards, such a reservoir of power is infinite; but it is our privilege to rise above these standards, and to regard * The Constitution of the Universe. Fortnightly Recieic, the sun himself as a speck in infinite extension, a mere drop in the universal sea. We analyze the space in which he is immersed, and which is the vehicle of his power. We pass to other systems and other suns, each pouring forth energy like our own, but still without infringements of the law, which reveals immutability in the midst of change, which recognizes incessant transference, conversion, hut neither final gain nor loss. This law generalizes the aphorism of Solomon, that there is nothing new under the sun, by teaching us to detect everywhere, under its infinite variety of appearances, the same primeval force. To nature nothing can be added ; from nature nothing can be taken away; the sum of her energies is constant, and the utmost man can do in the pur- suit of physical truth, or in the application of physical know- ledge, is to shift the constituents of the never-varying total. The law of conservation rigidly excludes both creation and annihilation. Waves may change to ripples, and ripples to waves magnitude may be substituted for number, and number for magnitude asteroids may aggregate to suns, suns may tesohe themselves into flora, and fauna, and florae, and f aunts melt in air the flux of power is eternally the same, it rolls in music through the ages, and all terrestrial energy the manifestations of life as well as the display of pheno- mena are but modulations." CHAPTER II. FORCE; ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. It is probable that at the origin of our globe, the con- centration of force previously diffused in the form of so- called nebulous matter, produced an amount of heat which gradually took the shapes we have now around us. Certain forces were chemically united, as in our primary rocks, others were divorced, as the oxygen from the carbon in the coal. By bringing the carbon and the oxygen in our atmo- sphere together again we have the same amount of force, in the shape of heat, which it originally took to separate them. It takes an immense amount of force to separate magnesia into oxygen and magnesium, and their reunion is propor- tionately intense, as is now so beautifully and easily illustrated in the burning of magnesium wire. It is by the action of these forces that most of the changes we see around us are still produced. The force derived from the union of oxygen with the coal annually dug from the British mines is cal- culated to be equal to that of the whole human race. The light and heat of the sun's rays separated the carbon and oxygen in plants and vegetables, and an immense amount of force is generated whenever the carbon and oxygen again meet, whether it be in the fire-place, or, more amicably and less energetically, in the animal body. Thus Dr. Neil Amott says: " James Watt, when devising his great engine, knew well that the rapid combination of the oxygen of 8 FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. atmospheric air with the combustible fuel in the furnace, produced the heat and force of the engine; but he did not know that in living bodies there is going on, only more slowly, a similar combination of the oxygen of the air with the like combustible matter in the food, as this circulates after digestion in the form of blood through the lungs, which combination produces the warmth and force of the living animal. The chief resemblances of the two objects are exhibited strikingly in the following table of comparison, where, in two adjoining columns, are set forth nearly the same things and actions, with difference only in the names : The Steam Engine in action takes 1. Fuel, viz. : coal and wood, both being old or dry vegetable mat- ter, and both combustible. 2. Water. 3. Air. And produces. 4. Steady boiling heat of 212 de- grees by quick combustion. 5. Smoke from the chimney, or air loaded with carbonic acid and vapour. 6. Ashes, part of the fuel which does not burn. 7. Motive force, of simple alternate push and pull in the piston, which, acting through levers, joints, bands, &c., does work of endless variety. The animal body in life, takes 1. Food, viz. : recent or fresh vege- table matter and flesh, both be- ing of kindred composition, and both combustible. 2. Drink, (essentially water). 3. Breath, (common air.) And produces 4. Steady animal heat of 98 de- grees, by slow combustion. 5. Foul breath from the windpipe, or air loaded with carbonic acid and vapour. 6. Animal refuse, part of the food which does not burn. 7. Motive force, of simple alternate contraction and relaxation in the muscles, which, acting through the levers, joints, tendons, &c., of the limbs, does work of end- less variety. LIFE NOT A PECULIAR PRINCIPLE. 9 8. A deficiency of fuel, water, or 8. A deficiency of food, drink, or air, first disturbs, and then stops breath, first disturbs, then stops the motion. the motion and the life. 9. Local damage from violence in 9. Local hurt or disease in a living a machine is repaired by the body is repaired or cured by the makers.* action of internal power given by the Creator. We have here illustrated the mode only in which the force in animals is generated; the form it ultimately takes depends entirely upon the organization through which it has to pass. Life was thought to be a peculiar principle ; but it depends for its development and manifestation entirely upon the union of the ordinary physical forces with a peculiar structure or arrangement of forces ; for what are called vital forces are only the correlate of physical forces. In a very small part of the acorn lies the structure that can develop only into an oak, and the human germ, in which lie folded up the wondrous powers of man, is invisible without the aid of the microscope. Life then is only Force acting through special organizations, which organizations, so far as we yet know, are formed only by transmission from parent to offspring; they are always hereditary. But seeds might remain for ever unchanged as the wheat in the pyramids, for 8,000 years, until quickened into being by forces from without. " Thus, for example, when a seed is placed in the ground, the first process which takes place within it is one of decomposition. The mass of the seed consists of starch and albumen, in the midst of which is placed a small cellular body, called the germ. This germ will grow, and develop into the future plant, but only on condition that a process of decay goes on in the starchy and albuminous matter with which it is in connection. Part of * A Survey of Human Progress, p. 159. 10 FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL COERELATES. the latter sinks into the inorganic state, uniting with oxygen, and passing off as carbonic acid. The young plant is at first of less weight than the seed or root which has disap- peared in generating it. When it arrives at the surface of the soil, a new process commences. The rays of the sun, falling on its leaves, maintain in them a continuance of the same process (one of chemical change) by which the first development of the germ was determined. Thus new ma- terials are added to the plant, the light exciting those chemical processes which produce the organic arrangement of fresh portions of matter. The leaves, under the stimulus of the sun's rays, decompose carbonic acid, giving off part of the oxygen, and ' fix, ' as it is said, the carbon in union with hydrogen, and sometimes with nitrogen, &c., to form the various vegetable cells and their contents. " An animal now consumes this plant. In digestion there takes place again a precisely similar process to that with which we started the germination of the seed. The substance of the plant partially decomposes ; a portion of it sinks into a state approximating to the inorganic, while another portion (doubtless by means of the force thus generated) becomes more highly vitalized, and fitted to form part of the animal structure. The germination of the seed, and animal digestion, are parallel processes. Each of them is two-fold a decomposing and a vitalizing action going on together, the latter having its origin in and depending on the other. Having formed part of the animal structure for a time, this living matter decomposes yet again, and again gives off its force. But now, instead of effecting, as in the previous cases, a vitalizing action, the force produces a mechanical action in the muscles, or a nervous action in the brain, or, ha short, the function of whatever organ the matter we are tracing may have been incorporated with; the VITAL FORCE. 11 function being but another, mode of operation of the same force which caused the nutrition. And thus, supposing the action to have been a muscular exertion, say the lifting of a weight, we shall have traced the force, which came from the inorganic world at first, in the form of the sun's rays, and was embodied in the substance of the plant, back again into the inorganic world in the form of motion. * * * The plant yields up its life to nourish the animal body, as that body, so nourished, in its activity yields up its life to impart force to the world around. * * * Every giving oft' of force has for its necessary effect the storing up of force in equal amount elsewhere. The two halves of this process cannot be divided."* f * Physiological Riddles. Cornhill Magazine. t There is an admirable paper on ''Vitality", illustrating this subject, in the "Header" of October 29th, 1864, signed " J. T.", evi- dently Professor Tyndall. As the subject is of so much importance we make no apology for quoting at some length. " In what sense, then, is the sun to be regarded as the origin of the energy derivable from plants and animals ? Let us try to give an intelligible answer to this question. Water may be raised from the sea-level to a high elevation, and then permitted to descend. In descending it may be made to assume various forms to fall in cas- cades, to spurt in fountains, to boil in eddies, or to flow tranquilly along a uniform bed. It may, moreover, be caused to set complex machinery in motion, to turn millstones, throw shuttles, work saws and hammers, and drive piles. But every form of power here indicated would be derived from the original power expended in raising the water to the height from which it fell. There is no energy generated by the ma- chinery; the work performed by the water in descending is merely the parcelling out and distribution of the work expended in raising it. In precisely this sense is all the energy of plants and animals the par- celling out and distribution of a power originally exerted by the sun. In the case of the water, the source of the power consists in the forcible separation of a quantity of the liquid from the lowest level of the earth's surface and its elevation to a higher position, the power thus expended being returned by the water in its descent. In the case of vital pheno- mena, the source of power consists in the forcible separation of the 12 FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. Thus we see that not a peculiar agent, called Life, but a peculiar mode of operation is required to produce the special results we call vital forces, and as Life is thus the mere correlate of Physical forces, so Mind is the correlate of atoms of chemical compounds by the sun of the carbon and hydrogen, for example, of the carbonic acid and water diffused throughout the atmosphere, from the oxygen with which they are combined. This separation is effected in the leaves of plants by solar energy. The con- stituents of the carbonic acid and water are there torn asunder in spite of their mutual attraction, the carbon and hydrogen are stored up in the wood, and the oxygen is set free in the air. When the wood is burned the oxygen recombines with the carbon, and the heat then given out is of the precise amount drawn from the sun to effect the previous " reduction" of the carbonic acid. The reunion of the carbon with the oxygen is similar to the reunion of our falling water with the earth from which it had been separated. We name the one action ' gravity ' and the other ' chemical affinity ' ; but these different names must not mis- lead us regarding the qualitative identity of the two forces. They are both attraction, and, to the intellect, the falling of carbon atoms against oxygen atoms is not more difficult of conception than the falling of water to the earth. " The building up of the vegetable then is effected by the sun through the reduction of chemical compounds. All the phenomena of animal life are more or less complicated reversals of these processes of reduc- tion. We eat the vegetable, and we breathe the oxygen of the air, and in our bodies the oxygen which had been lifted from the carbon and hydrogen by the action of the sun again falls towards them, producing animal heat and developing animal forms. Through the most compli- cated phenomena of vitality this law runs : the vegetable is produced by the lifting, the animal by the falling of a weight. But the question is not exhausted here. The water which we used in our first illustration produces all the motion displayed in its descent, but the form of the motion depends on the character of the machinery interposed in the path of the water. And thus the primary action of the sun's rays is qualified by the atoms and molecules among which their energy is dis- tributed. Molecular forces determine the form which the solar energy will assume. In the one case this energy is so conditioned by its atomic machinery as to result in the formation of a cabbage ; in another case it is so conditioned as to result in the formation of an oak. So also as VITAL FORCE. 18 Vital forces. " That no idea or feeling arises, save as a result of some physical force expended in producing it, is fast becoming a common-place of science; and whoever duly weighs the evidence will see, that nothing but an over- regards the reunion of the carbon and the oxygen the form of their reunion is determined by the molecular machinery through which the combining energy acts. In one case the action may result in the formation of a man, while in another it may result in the formation of a grasshopper. " But whence comes the power on the part of the molecules to compel the solar energy to take determinate forms ? The matter of the animal body is that of inorganic nature. There is no substance in the animal tissues which is not primarily derived from the rocks, the water, and the air. Are the forces of organic matter, then, different in kind from those of inorganic matter ? All the philosophy of the present day nega- tives the question. It is the compounding in the organic world of forces that belong equally to the inorganic that constitutes the mystery and the miracle of vitality. Every portion of every animal body may be reduced to purely inorganic matter. A perfect reversal of this process of reduc- tion would carry us from the inorganic to the organic; and such a reversal is at least conceivable. The tendency, indeed, of modern science is to break down the wall of partition between organic and inor- ganic, and to reduce both to the operation of forces which are the same in kind, but whose combinations differ in complexity. " The mode in which these combinations have been brought about is a perfectly legitimate subject of scientific speculation ; and in this we will here so far indulge as to ask a single speculative question. It is generally supposed that our earth once belonged to the sun, from which it was detached in a molten condition. Hence arises the question ' Did that incandescent world contain latent within itself the elements of life ? ' Or, supposing a planet carved from our present sun, and set spinning round him at the distance of our earth, would one of the con- sequences of its refrigeration be the development of organic forms? Structural forces certainly lie latent in the molten mass, whether or not those forces reach to the extent of forming a plant or an animal. All the marvels of crystalline force, all those wonderful branching frost- ferns which cover our window-panes on a winter morning the exquisite molecular architecture which is now known to belong to the ice of our frozen lakes all this ' coustructiveness ' lies latent in an amorphous 14 FOKCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. whelming bias in favour of a pre-conceived theory, can explain its non-acceptance. How this metamorphosis takes place how a force existing as emotion, heat, or light, can become a mode of consciousness how it is possible for aerial vibrations to generate the sensation we call sound, or for the forces liberated by chemical changes, in the brain to give rise to motion these are mysteries which it is impossible to fathom. But they are not profounder mysteries than the transformation of the physical forces into each other. They are not more completely beyond our comprehension than the natures of Mind and Matter. They have simply the same insolubility as all other ultimate questions. We can learn nothing more than that here is one of the uniformities in the order of phenomena." * The peculiar mode of operation which force assumes, whether as mechanical force or motion, heat, magnetism, or feeling, emotion, or thought, depends, as we have said, upon organization or structure, that is, upon the arrangement of drop of water, and comes into play when the water is sufficiently cooled. And who will set limits to the possible play of molecular forces in the cooling of a planet? / " In discussing these questions it is impossible to avoid taking side- glances at the phenomena of intellect and will. Are they, by natural evolution, capable of being developed from incandescent matter ? Whe- ther they are or not, we do not seem to possess the rudiments of an organ which could enable us to comprehend the change ; we are utterly incompetent to take the step from the phenomena of physics to those of consciousness. And, even granting the validity of the above explana- tion, the questions still remain, ' Who or what made the sun and gave his rays such power ? Who or what bestowed upon the ultimate par- ticles of matter the forces whose interaction, combined with the energy of the solar rays, produces plants and animals ? ' Science does not know : the mystery, though pushed back, remains as deep as ever." * First Principles, by Herbert Spencer, p. 280. PECULIARITIES OF STRUCTURE. 15 permanent centres of force. The Natural Philosopher is constantly coming near to this fact, without seeing its full significance. Thus Liehig says, "Isomorphism, or the quality of form of many chemical compounds having a dif- ferent composition, tends to prove that matter consists of atoms, the mere arrangement of which produces all the properties of bodies. But when we find that a different arrangement of the same elements gives rise to various physical and chemical properties, and a similar arrangement of different elements produces properties very much the same, may we not inquire whether some of those hodies which we regard as elements, may not be merely modifications of the same substance, whether they are not the same matter in different states of arrangement ?" * All we have to consider is Force as it passes through the living structure of the human body, in its various modes of operation. The peculiarities of structure which modify the form and action of force in the human body depend principally upon the stock, or race, from which the individual is descended. Among animals almost any form and quality of the species can be produced by crossing, but whether these changes can be said to be improvements upon the original type is another thing. Certainly mongrels among dogs and horses are not considered to be any improvement, and the same may almost invariably be said of mixed races of men ; the higher type loses what the inferior gains. The mixing of English and Hindoo blood often results in feebleness of brain bordering on fatuity or insanity. The modern Mexican a mixture of the Spaniard and the native Indian, is an inferior race, &c. We are familiar with this influence of stock in what is called budding and grafting in trees. A bud of one tree introduced into the * Chemical Lectures, p. 54. 16 FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. bark of another retains all the peculiarities of its original parentage, and a small branch of one tree transferred to another retains all the specialities that distinguish its fruit, although dependent entirely upon the root, stock, and circu- latory system of another tree. Although we can trace no difference of structure between the graft and the branch to which it is attached, no doubt it is there that the difference lies, it is upon that difference of arrangement that the modification of the vital force depends. That the new branch should retain all the specialities of its parent stock under such circumstances is both wonderful and instructive, for the same kind of budding and grafting is constantly going on in the intermarriages of human beings, although the fruit individuals bear in consequence passes almost unnoticed. There are certain broadly- marked constitutional qualities, however, which have not escaped notice. These have been called by Phrenologists the Temperaments. " There are four temperaments," we are told by Mr. George Combe, " accom- panied by different degrees of strength and activity in the brain the lymphatic, the sanguine, the bilious, and the nervous. The temperaments are supposed to depend upor the constitution of particular systems of the body : the brain and nerves being predominantly active from constitutional causes, seem to produce the nervous temperament; the lungs, heart, and blood-vessels being constitutionally predominant, to give rise to the sanguine; the muscular and fibrous sys- tem to the bilious; and the glands and assimilating organs to the lymphatic." * These differences and their combina- tions are very obviously marked and indicate great differences in the bodily and mental characters of individuals. There is a very wide field, however, open for observation beyond; the * System of Phrenology, p. 50. GALVANIC STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN. 17 bilious or fibrous temperament, for instance, is said to give endurance, but it is by no means sufficient to account for the great power of endurance of bodily fatigue that distin- guished such men as Napoleon Buonaparte; the nervous temperament is supposed to give great mental activity, but this does not account for the kind of memory said to be possessed by Sir Walter Scott and others, by which they were enabled to remember almost ah 1 they read. These and many similar powers probably depend upon some pecu- liar quality or structure of body and brain yet unobserved. The Brain is the organ of mind, that is, it is in the brain and nervous system that the correlation or change of force takes place which distinguishes thought and feeling from heat, electricity, magnetism, &c., and we have the equivalent of that force again in muscular action, heat, electricity, &c. The brain has a peculiar structure fitting it for its peculiar electrical and galvanic operations; thus, Professor Ehrenberg asserts that by means of the microscope he has discovered the fibres of the encephalon, spinal chord, and nerves, to be tubular, i. e., that they do not consist of solid fibres, but of parallel or fasciculated tubes, dilated at inter- vals or jointed, and from one-ninety-sixth to one-three- thousandth parts of a line in diameter. Also, that they contain a perfectly transparent tenacious fluid, never visibly globular, the liquor nervens, which differs from the nervens medulla as the chyle does from blood. * f * Human Physiology, p. 466. Dr. Elliotson. + To what extent the more recent researches of Dr. Lionel Beale, as given in his paper on " the Paths of Nerve-currents ", in the Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xiii., p. 386, confirm those of Ehrenherg, I am not able to say, as I have not the book at hand. But Mr. Bain tells us that " for every fibre coming up from the senses, and every fibre going out to the limbs and moving organs there must c 18 FOKCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORKELATES. The dependance of the mind upon the bodily organization, and upon the force derived from the food acting through it, now needs no proof. The mind like the body has its several ages it is childish in childhood, strong in manhood, weak in sickness, frenzied in madness, and doting in old age. It sympathises with digestion, and changes with each change in the blood. If the circulation is rapid it quickens thought, so that in fever we have delirium, and from excess of alcohol delirium tremens. "With excess of carbonic acid the action ceases altogether, and with excess of oxygen (nitrous oxygen or laughing gas) the action is greatly increased. If the purifying organs are out of order we have serious mental depression, and if we abstract heat or give chloroform, first mental action and then vitality ceases altogether ; but mental action first. The dependence of the thinking power upon the food requires no proof, as thinking ceases altogether if food is too long withheld; but close observation shows that not only do alcohol, opium, and hashish* act upon the mind in the mode be at least 10,000, perhaps 100,000 traversing the hrain, involving a great and rapid multiplication in the progress through the cerehral substance. The Fortnightly Review, January, 1866. * Besides the various effects which are common to all the principal narcotics, each has characteristics of its own. Hashish produces real catalepsy, and exaggerates rather than prevents the report of the external senses as to external objects ; the thorn-apple, on the other hand, causes truly spectral illusions, and enables the Indian to converse with the spirit of his ancestors. The Siberian fungus gives insensibility to pain without interfering with consciousness. The common buff-ball stops all muscular action, and leaves the perceptive powers untouched. Cocculus indicus makes the body drunk, without affecting the mind. Coca has the wonderful power of sustaining muscular strength in the absence of food, and of preventing th wasting of the tissues of the body during the greatest and most prolonged exertion. The effects of the THE BRAIN AND NERVOUS SYSTEM PREDOMINANT. 19 with which we are familiar, but all kinds of food affect the mind differently, causing difference in action. But if the food acts upon the mind, so does the mind upon the food; " When the pneumo-gastric or chief nerve of the stomach is tied or cut through, and its end separated so as to interrupt the flow of nervous energy towards that organ, digestion is either entirely arrested or greatly impaired. * But the brain and nervous system dominate in all parts of the system, and influence both its action and form. The brain is nourished by the heart, and if it ceased for one instant to send its blood to the brain, Sensibility would cease; and the heart equally depends for motive power upon the brain. " Powerful mental shocks momently arrest the heart, and sometimes arrest it for ever. That which a powerful current will do applied to a pneumogastric nerve, will be done by a profound agitation of grief or joy truly called a heart-shaking influence. The agitation of the great centres of thought is communicated to the spinal chord, and from it to the nerves which issue to different parts of the body; the limbs are violently moved, the glands are excited to increased activity, the tears flow, the facial muscles contract, the chest expands, laughter or sobs, dances of delight and shouts of joy, these and the manifold expressions of an agitated emotion are the after results the first effect is an arrest, more or less fugitive, followed different narcotics are not only peculiar, but often opposed. Opium and Hashish, common in most of their effects, are opposite in this, that the former diminishes sensibility to external impressions, whereas the latter almost infinitely increases it. Betel is even an antidote to opium, as tea is to alcohol. Tobacco suspends mental activity ; opium and hashish increase it a thousand fold. National Review, p. 94, Jan., 1858. * Dr. A. Combe on Digestion and Dietetics, p. 77. 20 FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. by an increase of the heart's action. If the organism be vigorous, the effect of a powerful emotion is a sudden pale- ness, indicating a momentary arrest of the heart. This may be but for an instant: the heart pauses, and the lungs pause with it ' the breath is taken away.' This is succeeded by an energetic palpitation; the lungs expand, the blood rushes to the face and brain with increased force. Should the organism be sickly or highly sensitive, the arrest is of longer duration, and faulting, more or less prolonged, is the result. In a very sensitive or very sickly organization the arrest is final. The shock of joy and the shock of grief have both been known to kill."* The Brain and Nervous System influence not only the functions, but the growth of the whole body, regulating the form both of the muscles and bones of expression and action, and thus physiognomy and chirognomy are legitimate sciences.! But it is a limited quantity of force that is derived from the food, and the mode of its action depends upon its distribution over the body, and the functions it has there to perform. This is regulated, as we have seen, greatly by the Temperaments. While digestion is going on the powers of thinking and feeling are proportionately decreased ; so also great bodily exercise and great mental activity are incompatible. Again, the great activity of one portion of the brain decreases the energy of another a predominating intellect weakens feeling, and an active propensity the moral sentiments. This distribution of force explains many hitherto * The Heart and the Brain, by G. H. Lewes. The Fortnightly Review. t See Psychonomy of the Hand, according to MM. D'Arpantigny and Desborralles, by Richard Beamish, F.R. S. London, F. Pitman, 20, Paternoster Bow. THE DISTRIBUTION OF MENTAL FORCE. 21 mysterious physiological phenomena. In the nomad tribes and the agricultural population, where great muscular out- door exercise is required, and the vital system consequently greatly predominates, the vis.jnedicatrix, or natural healing power, is much stronger than in people of sedentary and studious habits, and the one class recovers from accidents that would be death to the other. So also studious habits or strong feelings impair vital power. The sexual feeling is generally the strongest in the system and absorbs the largest amount of force, and when it comes into too early activity, it stops the growth of the body, and a large ama- tiveuess is generally attended with deficient locomotive or muscular power. The emasculated London cats grow to greater size than their unmutilated brethren in the country, and geldings and oxen have much more working power, that is, enduring muscular force, than stallions and bulls. When the important vital action, the renovation of the body by putting in new tissue, is going on, the action of the Mind ceases altogether, and what we call sleep more or less perfect, supervenes. But the Brain, as the organ of Mind, is not a single organ, but a congeries or bundle of organs, manifesting a plurality of faculties, with force in proportion to the size and quality of the organ. Mind as a force, as a function or power of Brain, should be studied as other forces, in its manifestations in its attributes by what it does. Examined in this way, Dr. Gall discovered that a strong verbal memory was always accompanied by a prominent eye, which prominence he found to depend upon the large size of a convolution of the brain, lying at the back of the eye. Pursuing his investigations he found that the special talents of the musician, the sculptor, the artist, the mathema- 22 FORCE, AND ITS MENTAL CORRELATES. tician, the calculator, the metaphysician, &c., were dependent upon different parts of the brain, and he and his followers, after long and repeated observation, have come to the know- ledge of what faculties and feelings and what parts of the brain are mutually connected. As all organizations differ, and that which is true of one mind, therefore, can only be relatively true of another, reflec- tion upon the consciousness which such organization supplies, cannot alone be the true method of investigating mind, it can be pursued only in conjunction with external observation. Following this method Phrenologists have established the following chart of our Intellectual Faculties : INTELLECTUAL FACULTIES, which perceive existence. Individuality Takes cognizance of existence and simple facts. Form Renders men observant of Form. Size Renders men observant of dimensions, and aids perspective. Weight Communicates the perception of momentum, weight, resist- ance, and aids equilibrium. Colouring Gives perception of colour. INTELLECTUAL FACULTIES, which perceive the relations of external objects. Locality Gives the idea of space and relative position. Number Gives the talent for calculation. Order Communicates the love of physical arrangement. Eventuality Takes cognizance of occurrences and events. Time Gives rise to the perception of duration. Tune The sense of melody arises from it. Language Gives a facility in acquiring a knowledge of arbitrary signs to express thoughts readiness in the use of them ; and a power of inventing them. REFLECTIVE FACULTIES, which Compare, judge, and discriminate. Comparison Gives the power of discovering analogies, resemblances, and differences. THE WORLD CREATED WITHIN US. 23 Causality Traces the dependencies of phenomena, and the relations of cause and effect, The External Senses of Feeling or Touch, Taste, Smell, Hearing, and Sight, are necessary to connect these faculties with the external world, and to hring them into activity. The above phrenological organs furnish what are called by metaphysicians the a priori forms of thought. The raw force, if I may use the expression, taken in with the food at one part of the machine, is by the action of external force upon these organs, manufactured into the beautiful phantasmagoria of the external world. SECTION I. THE PSYCHOLOGY OP PHRENOLOGY. " We are such stuff, As dreams are made of, and our little life Is rounded by a sleep." Shakspeare. " Omne quod cognoscitur non secundum sui vim, sed .secundum cognoscentium potius comprehenditur facultatem." " All that is known is comprehended, not according to its own force, but according rather to the faculty of those knowing." Boethius. " For man's sense is falsely asserted to be the standard of things. On the contrary all the perceptions, both of the sense and of the mind, have reference to Man, and not to the universe." Bacon, Nov. Org., Aph. 41. By careful observation of the action of the primitive faculties we are able to determine most of those psychological questions upon which metaphysical philosophers are still dis- puting, as Mill on Hamilton, Herbert Spencer on Mill, &o. 24 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PHRENOLOGY. The facts observed by the cerebral physiologists or phreno- logists, however at present ignored and repudiated, furnish the test of the truth of these various conflicting systems. The Intellectual Faculties supply us with ideas, which ideas are only slight feelings or sensations, differing from our other feelings only in intensity. A perception of ideas and feelings pass through the mind, or rather constitute the mind; upon this succession we reflect or are conscious, and the only objects of knowledge are these ideas and feelings. We are conscious of nothing but these changes, and we never really advance one step beyond ourselves, or can know any kind of existence but those perceptions that lie in that narrow compass. We infer, however, that these ideas are connected with the brain, that the brain is in connection with the senses, and that the senses are acted upon by something external. But it is ideas only of which we are conscious, and it is these only therefore we can be said to know; of this " some- thing external " we know nothing, and by what name we call it therefore signifies little. Matter and Force are the names we give to this non-ego. The properties of matter which are supposed to distinguish it from force, are, as we shall see, mere forms of thought, " clusters of sensations"; correlated force. The combination of forces which compose our own bodies, certain centres or reservoirs of which constitute the reality of the external world, clearly exist independently of percep- tion, and are not mere abstractions, and if we disconnect the percipient from these external forces perception ceases. The organs of the Brain, through which the correlation of vital force to mental takes place, are of two kinds; those which are acted upon by external causes, through the medium of the senses, and the ideas belonging to which, therefore are THE COMBINED ACTION OF THE FACULTIES. 25 modified by the sense; and those faculties which act upon these ideas when so furnished by the first class. They have been divided into ideas of Simple and Relative Perception. All the knowledge we have therefore of an external world is of its action through the medium of the senses upon only a few of the mental faculties, and which perceptive faculties alone would be quite insufficient to give us the idea of nature as we now conceive of it. The world, as it appears to us as it exists in the region of our consciousness, is created in our own minds by the action of the faculties of Eelative Per- ception and of Reflection upon the comparatively few ideas furnished by the faculties of Simple Perception. Our ideas of things result from the relation between the object or cause, the sense, and the three classes of intellectual faculties, and the vain effort to untie this untieable synthesis has caused most of the errors of the metaphysician. " What we term the properties of an object, are the powers it exerts of producing sensations in our conscious- ness." * The object acts upon the sense, and the sense upon the perceptive faculties of Form, Size, Weight, Colour, &c., and we have ideas of shapes and sizes and colours, of exten- sion, of weight, of solidity, hardness, strength, &c., and these we call the properties of matter. The idea of extension and solidity, which is supposed peculiarly to distinguish matter, is derived from the faculties of form, size, and colour, which give the shape, and weight, the sense of resistance. Indivi- duality unites these qualities into one, and gives the idea of the individual or substratum or nournenon upon which they are supposed to depend. " The name ' rose ' is the mark of the sensation of colour, a sensation of shape, a sen- sation of touch, a sensation of smell, all in conjunction * J. S. MM. 26 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PHRENOLOGY. (an action of the senses and intellectual faculties combined). * * * Of those names (such as rose) which denote clusters of sensation, it is obvious that some include a greater some a less, number of sensations. * * * We not only give names to clusters of sensations, but to clusters of clusters, that is to a number of minor clusters united into a greater cluster. Thus we give the name ' wood ' to a particular cluster of sensations, the name canvas to ano- ther, the name rope to another. To these clusters and many others, joined together in one great cluster, we give the name ship. * * * And again, in using the names tree, horse, man, the names of what I call objects, I am referring only to my own sensations (and to other people's sensations); in fact, therefore, only naming a cer- tain number of sensations, regarded as in a particular state of combination; that is, in concomitance."* Accordingly, we name only our own sensation or idea, but this idea is compounded equally of the object, the sense, and the intel- lectual faculties, each of which we know can exist separately. Thus the noise which we say we hear in the street, is a sensation really in our own head, although the cause of the sensation is in the street and each has a separate and dis- tinct existence. The cause in the street may affect other people in the same way, and have numberless other effects, while the sensation is a correlate of physical forces, proceeding from or put in motion in the street, which may again become physical force and take its place in the external world. The ego and the non-ego thus pass and repass into each other and are constantly changing places. INDIVIDUALITY. It is the form of thought peculiar to the organ of Individuality that gives oneness or unity to * James Mill. CONSCIOUSNESS, AND ITS RELIABILITY. 27 these clusters of sensations. We individualize all our own parts and functions, and call it our body ; we do the same with reference to the succession of our ideas, and call it our mind. IDENTITY. The feeling of Personal Identity which wo attach to this evanescent "cluster of ideas" which we call body and mind, results from a primitive mental faculty, or instinct, connected with its special organ in the brain. This is evidenced by the organ sometimes becoming diseased, when the feeling of Identity the "I" of consciousness, becomes lost, or double, or otherwise deranged. BELIEF. Each intellectual faculty and feeling supplies us with an instinct or intuition, and it is in the action of these faculties, in the intuitions supplied by them, that mankind necessarily believe. They furnish our fundamental truths. Faith or belief is not an action of the intellectual faculties, but a sentiment or feeling, and it is as easy to believe in one order of nature, or set of sequences, as in another, until experience or the intellect has determined what are permanent or invariable. Of course we can believe only in what we understand; when we are said to believe in the incomprehensible, we believe only in the testimony, or in so much only as we do understand. CONSCIOUSNESS, AND ITS EELIABILITY. And now comes the question : are our Instincts or Intuitions worthy of belief? These intuitions, resulting from the action of our primitive faculties, constitute our Consciousness; is the verdict of consciousness to be accepted without appeal, or can we reject its testimony? First, we must examine what is consciousness, and what is the nature of its verdict. James Mill says, " To have a feeling is to be conscious ; and to be conscious is to have a feeling;" and J. S. Mill says, " To feel and not to know that we feel is an impossi- 28 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PHKENOLOGY. bility." Now the brutes have feelings, but there is no evidence that they are conscious of them; they feel, but do not know that they feel. They have consciousness, but are not conscious; for consciousness is used by most writers to mean sensibility or feeling; but to be conscious is to reflect on this sensibility or feeling. The brute when it chews the cud has a succession of slightly pleasurable feelings, the aggregate of which constitute a mild kind of happiness. It cannot be said to be conscious of this, but there is not less happiness because it does not reflect upon it. The faculties by which we know and feel, and those by which we know that we know and feel, are different, and one class the reflective faculties judges of the trustworthiness of the other. But there is no more a distinct act of consciousness attending every act of mind, than there is a distinct act of Will attending every act of body. Nature consists of " what perceives and what is perceived," but this is merely one class of mental faculty acting upon another that is, reflection on consciousness. " What we perceive under the condition of contact or touch, say the Berkelians, are sensations only, and not the causes of sensations." Now the cause is certainly contained in the sensation perceived, which is the resultant equally of the cause or object, the sense, and the mental faculty, that is, the sensation is the correlate or exact equiva- lent of the force without and the nervous force within. BELIEF IN AN EXTERNAL WORLD. The generality of mankind believe in an External World as it appears to them, as something without and entirely independent of them- selves; they know nothing of consciousness and of sensa- tions. They understand nothing and believe nothing about the " objects of knowledge being ideas," they believe only in things which are hot or cold, rough or smooth, hard or soft, coloured, &c. They have " an instantaneous and irresistible THE BELIEF IN AN EXTERNAL WORLD. 29 conviction of outward objects," but they know nothing of " Permanent Possibilities of Sensation." They believe in material objects, and not in modifications of our sensibility, or the Relativity of our Knowledge. It is the non-ego, and not the mind perceiving, in which we first believe, and this conviction is not slowly acquired, but is instinctive or intui- tional the result of our primitive faculties.* It is doubt * "What do mankind in general believe? They believe that the material world is exactly and in every respect the world which our senses report to us as external to ourselves. They believe that the rocks, the hills, the trees, the stars, that we all see, are not mere hieroglyphics of a something different from themselves and from us, but are really what is there. That outer vastness of space in which orbs are shining and wheeling is no mere representation or visionary allegory of some- thing ; it is the thing itself. This is, and always has been, the popular belief of mankind in general. All mankind may therefore be described, generally, as Natural Realists. But, strange to say, Natural Realism has been the system of but one or two modern philosophers among whom Reid is named as a type. Nay, more, among these philosophers it is not the popular form of the belief that is entertained. Mankind in general suppose sweetness, shrillness, colour, &c., to be qualities inhe- rently belonging to the objects to which they are attributed, while the philosophers who are Natural Realists admit that at least these so-called ' secondary qualities ' of objects have no proper outness, but are only physiological affections, affections of the organs of taste, hear- ing, sight, &c., produced by particular objects. Thus the Natural Realism of philosophers is itself a considerable remove from the Natural Realism of the crude popular belief. It does not, with the crude popular belief, call the whole apparent world, of sights, sounds, tastes, tacts, and odours the real world that would be there whether man were there or not ; true, it descries in that apparent world a block or core, if I may so say, which would have to be thought of as really existing, even if there were swept away all that consists in our rich physiological interactions with it. " According to this system. (Constructive Idealism) we do not per- ceive the real external world immediately, but only mediately that is, the objects which we take as the things actually perceived are not the real objects at all, but only vicarious assurances, representatives, or nuntii of real unknown objects. The hills, the rocks, the trees, the stars, all the choir of heaven and earth, are not, in any of their qualities, primary, 80 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PHKENOLOGY. that is acquired, and we ask ourselves, Are these intuitions to be relied on ? For as Fichte says, speaking of a tree and things external, " there is in fact nothing there, but only a manifes- tation of Power from something that is not I." Kant also observes " that there is an illusion inherent in our constitu- tions ; that we cannot help conceiving as belonging to Things themselves, attributes with which they are only clothed by the laws of our sensitive and intellectual nature." To affirm so much, however, is not to reject the testimony of consciousness ; for when one class of faculties the reasoning faculties, tests the testimony of another class, any resulting contradiction is the testimony of consciousness. " The action of the intellectual faculties in imparting knowledge, is much more simple in its character than the infinite variety of ideas would at first induce us to sup- secondary, or whatever we choose to call them, the actual existence out of us, but only the addresses of a ' something ', to our physiology, or eductions by our physiology out of a ' something.' They are all Thoughts or Ideas, with only this peculiarity involved in them, that they will not rest in themselves, but compel a reference to objects out of self, with which, by some arrangement or other, they stand in relation. Difficult as this system may be to understand, and violently as it wrenches the popular common sense, it is yet the system into which the great majority of philosophers in all ages and countries hitherto are seen, more or less distinctly, to have been carried by their speculations. While the Natural Realists among philosophers have been very few, and even these have been Realists in a sense unintelligible to the popular mind, quite a host of philosophers have been Constructive Idealists. These might be farther subdivided according to particular variations in the form of their Idealism. Thus, there have been many Constructive Idealists who have regarded the objects rising to the mind in external perception, and taken to be representative of real unknown objects, as something more than modifications of -the mind itself as having their origin without. Among these have been reckoned Mallebranche, Berke- ley, Clarke, Sir Isaac Newton, Tucker, and possibly Locke." Recent British Philosophy, p. 68, et seq. Professor Masson. THE SIMPLE ACTION OF THE INTELLECTUAL FACULTIES. 81 pose. Thus we perceive qualities of form, size, colour, &c., and we attach these qualities to individual existences: we perceive the number, arrangement and relative position of such existences, and conceive of them as existing in space; we have ideas also of motion and active phenomena, and conceive of their existence in time: we trace also resem- blances and differences, and relations of antecedence and consequence, and distinguish between invariable antecedents called causes, and such as are not permanent. Now some of the faculties that produce this mental action have direct relation to external objects, and others have relation only to the ideas furnished by them; so that part of our ideas only being furnished by external causes, and part by the action of the mental faculties upon these ideas, we cannot say that all our knowledge comes through the senses. Certain im- pressions received from without are by the mind itself worked up into a picture which we suppose to belong, or to have its prototype, hi the external world, but which is, in fact, manu- factured in the mind, and exists only in minds similarly constituted." * Kow what say our Reasoning powers of a world thus created? Contrary to the impressions supplied by Individu- ality, they tell us that there are no such things as individuals ,f We find a world of effects, no causes a succession of per- sistent forces: " Nothing in this world is single, All things by a law divine In one another's being mingle." The solidified gases which constitute man's bodily indivi- * Philosophy of Necessity, p. 192. + As we have said, every correlation or change of force creates a now existence or individuality, but it is part only of the great whole, and could have no existence separately. 82 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PHRENOLOGY. duality are in constant flux and change with all around, and his mind is a succession of separate correlated forces or ideas. As Hume says, " 'Tis still true, that every distinct perception, which enters into the composition of the mind, is a distinct existence, and is different, and distinguishable, and separable from every other perception, either contem- porary or successive." If there be any individuality here, it belongs to every separate thought; but this individuality is absorbed, as we shall find, in the One Substance, the only Unity. EXTENSION AND SPACE. But the external world is sup- posed to be extended ; but what is Extension ? It results from the joint action of the organs of Form, Size, and Weight, that is, it is a compound idea. As Hume says, " The very idea of extension is copied from nothing but an impression, and consequently must perfectly agree to it." But he also says, " Can any one conceive a passion of a yard in length, a foot in breadth, and an inch in thickness? Thought therefore and extension are qualities wholly incompatible, and never can incorporate together into one subject." The same must be said of Space, so far as the idea of it is based upon Extension. But is not our idea of Space derived from the existence of other beings, of things without ourselves whose nature or essence is thought and force ? The idea of extension is excluded from thought and force. The ego and non-ego must occupy different positions, and it is this that gives us the idea of Space. It is the form of thought furnished by the organ of locality, joined, perhaps, to the idea of extension. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY QUALITIES NOT TENABLE. The distinction which meta- physicians make between the Primary and Secondary Qualities of bodies is untenable ; the external cause of colour is equally existent with those which give the ideas of solidity and PBIJIARY AND SECONDARY QUALITIES. 33 extension, and equally existent whether the percipient be present or not. Mr. J. S. Mill, however, says, " The sensations answering to the Secondary Qualities are only occasional, those to the Primary, constant. The Secondary, moreover, vary with different persons, and with the primary sensibility of our organs: the Primary, when perceived at all, are, as far as we know, the same to all persons and at all times." Now the fact is, that the strength of these percep- tions is exactly in proportion to the size of the organs with which they are connected. People are met with who cannot distinguish one colour from another, and others are equally blind as to forms and sizes, and who could no more be taught to draw than a person with a small organ of colour could paint, or one with a deficient organ of Tune could be taught music. Mr. Mill, however, elsewhere says truly, " How do we know that magnitude is not exclusively a property of our sensations of the states of subjective consciousness which objects produce in us? (It certainly is quite as much so as colour.) Or, he continues, if this supposition displeases, how do we know that magnitude is not, as Kant considered it, a form of our minds, an attribute with which the laws of thought invest every conception that we can form, but to which there may be something analagous in the Noumenon, the Thing in itself?" Kant's categories are his mode of arriving by Reflection on consciousness at the list of Intel- lectual Faculties or modes of thought which Gall and his followers have arrived at by observation, and they correspond, more correctly than in any other system, to the faculties of Simple and Relative Perception and Reasoning Powers. Our ideas of Relative Perception are not derived from experience; they are innate ideas or intuitions not derived from without, and have therefore no objective reality. These faculties act upon those which perceive existence, give to their modes of D 84 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PHREXOLOGY. thought symmetry and order; each adds its part, the pecu- liar form it is its province to create, and the picture is painted in our consciousness, which we call the external world. RELATIVITY OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. We know then only how we are affected by things external; we know only the world which such affections create in us ; what effect the same causes may have acting on other beings, differently consti- tuted, it is impossible to say, neither -can we tell what worlds so created lie without the sphere of our consciousness, and we cannot be too modest in our ignorance. THE WILL. The Will is the trigger of the mind. Upon the " last dictate of the understanding" it lets off the accu- mulated mental force in the direction of the object or purpose aimed at. The strength of the Will is in proportion to the force to be discharged, which force depends upon the size and quality of the organs of the brain in which the determination originates. The Will has an organ of its own, lying, according to Mr. Atkinson, behind the "Ego" or "I" of conscious- ness and close to Firmness; thus we get its characteristic expression "I will", and its excess or abuse " wilfulness ", and when joined to large Firmness it is determined or per- sistent Will. When Combativeness governs the Will, the force is generally discharged outwardly ; when Cautiousness or Secretiveness prevail, inwardly; often then disturbing the balance of other vital and mental forces. The Will no more lets off itself than the trigger 'of a gun does: it is generally pulled by the stronger motive, as understanding or mere feeling may prevail. THE PERSISTENCE OF FORCE. 35 SECTION II. THE PERSISTENCE OF FORCE. " Human Liberty of which all boast, consists solely in this, that man is conscious of his will, and unconscious of the causes by which it is determined." Spinoza. But if the generality of mankind have deceived themselves in believing in the real existence of an external world as it appears to them, and their intellectual faith is untenable, so is their moral belief equally unsound and fallacious. They believe in Free Will, that is in the power of originating volitions of an absolute commencement of action in them- selves whereas in nature there is no beginning, merely pre- existent and persistent force and its correlates. All tendencies, all volition and action, are manifestations of effects. " For each manifestation of force can be interpreted only as the effect of some antecedent force: no matter whether it be an inorganic action, an animal movement, a thought or feeling." First Principles, by Herbert Spencer. We know nothing of cause but as the immediate antecedent in the great chain of events going back to eternity, and centring in the One only originating and efficient cause of all things. It is easy to see how this error on the Freedom of the Will originates. The Will, is governed by the last dictate of the understanding, or of our impelling instincts our propensities and senti- ments; and we are conscious that our volitions originate in ourselves. By ourselves we mean the aggregate of all our mental powers. Now we are conscious of the action of our mental powers, but not of the external forces in which 36 THE PERSISTENCE OF FORCE. they originate and upon which they depend; hence arises the delusion. * Again, we believe we are free because we can do as we please, but what we please to do depends upon our natural powers, which of course are derived, as we did not endow ourselves with them, f " It is true that, in common language, the will is spoken of as the first cause of conscious thoughts and acts, but no act of will (that is, of mental energizing) can occur without its necessary co-existents and ante- cedents that is, its causes ; and such as these are, so will the act of will be. There is, in fact, no more a spontaneous act of will than there is spontaneous generation. Strictly such an act is a creation and belongs only to creative power." Mind and Brain, p. 275. Dr. Lay cock. t The Spectator in an article on Science and Miracle, January 27, 1866, says, " It is probably true indeed that in some sense the physical forces of the Universe are an invariable quantity, which only alter their forms and not their sum total. If I move my arm, the motion, says the physiologist, is only the exact equivalent of a certain amount of heat which has disappeared and taken the form of that motion. If I do not move it, the heat remains for use in some other way. In either case the stock of force is unchanged. This is the conviction of almost all scientific men and is probably true. But whether the stock of physical force is constant or not, the certainty that human will can change its direction and application can transfer it from one channel to another is just the same. And what that really means, if Will be ever free and uncaused, though of course not unconditioned, which is, we take it, as ultimate and scientific a certainty as any in the Uni- verse, is no less than this, that a strictly supernatural power alters the order and constitution of nature, takes a stock of physical force lying in a reservoir here and transfers it to a stream of effort there, in short, that the supernatural can change the order and constitution of the natural, in its essence 'pure miracle, though miracle of human, and not of divine origin." When the writer says that the Will is free but not "unconditioned" we might suppose that he means what we do, that we can all do as we please subject to the laws of our own being and the circumstances in which we are placed ; but how that can be " condi- tioned" and yet " uncaused" it is difficult to say. Sir William Hamilton who invented the word, says (Discussions, p. 8,) he means by Condi- tioned, determined thought. How can that be uncaused then, or " free", which is "determined"? How this is to be reconciled we are told by Sir William Hamilton when he comes to explain the Philosophy of the ETHICS ON A FALSE BASE. 87 Upon this assumed Freedom a whole system of error and superstition has been raised, but it is time now that Ethics were put upon the same footing as all other departments of science. The airs that man has given himself, and his assumption of superiority over all his brethren of the sentient Conditioned " Things there are, he tells us (Discussions, p. 624,) which may, nay must, be true, of which the understanding is wholly unable to construe to itself the possibility." " The Conditioned is the mean between the two extremes two unconditionates, exclusive of each other, neither of which can be conceded as possible, but of which, on the princi- ples of contradiction and excluded middle, one must be admitted as neces- sary." (Ibid. p. 15.) Of the two irreconcileable propositions Necessity and Free Will, the exigencies of the Spectator's creed require that he should accept the latter, although " his understanding may be wholly unable to construe to itself the possibility." The principles of all men of Science equally require that they should accept the former. How, therefore, the Spectator can assume that half the phenomena in the Universe those dependent on Volition or Will, are uncaused, is a scientific certainty, it is difficult to say. Science, on the contrary, determines that every effect has a cause, an invariable antecedent, which is always equal, in the same circumstances, to produce the same effect. But an effect without a cause is to produce something from nothing, and this is constantly being repeated in every act of volition ; a fact of which the " understanding is wholly unable to construe to itself the possibility." but it is the more to be believed by a Hamiltonian I suppose in consequence. It would indeed be a miracle, as the Spec- tator affirms ! The power or cause, we are told, that " changes' the order and constitution of the natural" is super-natural, but that which determines this power to act is nothing, or no cause ! To say that the Will determines itself is no way of escape from the difficulty, as there must be a cause why it determines to act in one way rather than in another. In fact a free will is an absurdity, if not an impossibility, for as long as it remains free, that is, undetermined by some motive or cause, it must be perfectly passive and useless or rather no will at all, but merely a conflicting state of mind : the mind may deliberate, but while it deliberates there is no will. How can a man will that about which he is undecided or uncertain and when will is thus determined and prepared for action how can it be free ? If free it is not will, if 88 THE PEKSISTENCE OF FOECE. creation are a little ridiculous viewed in this light of the persistence of force. As we are obliged to admit the Relativity of our Know- ledge, and we know things only as they affect us intellectually, so, morally, we judge of actions only as they affect us. As, however, all actions are the necessary result of pre-existent force, they are all morally alike in themselves right ancl determined it is not free. " Assurance only breeds resolve." But free wiith most libertarians, means self-determined, not uncaused, as with tbe Spectator, but self in this case, means all the attributes and powers we have derived from Nature and the action upon them of the then existing circumstances. I am not surprised that " free will " has been consigned to the region of the supernatural, for there is nothing free in nature, all there is determined according to calculable law. It is not very long since the most ordinary physical effects the causes not being evident or understood were supposed to be supernatural and each nation had its own peculiar way of propitiating the unknown Agent : now, in civilized countries, the supernatural is retained only in the department of mind, where the same ignorance exists as formerly in physics, and people try to avert a moral eclipse by observances and noises differing in kind only from that clashing of pots and pans still made by certain African tribes to keep off an eclipse of the moon. The Spectator says that every accurate thinker will see at once, that free will, Providence, and Miracles do not differ in principle at all, but are only more or less startling results of the same facts.' 1 '' In this, I believe, every " accurate thinker " among the Necessitarians will be disposed perfectly to agree with him. In the Spectator of the following week (February 3,) we have another writer on the same subject in a notice of Dr. Travis and Sir William Hamilton. Dr. Travis in " Moral Freedom ^Reconciled with Causation ", lays down the rather startling proposition that acts may be seJ/"-determined while they are caused by something else, a position rather difficult to reconcile with the ordinary use of logic. Although, says the Dr., we cannot control the affections acting upon our organiza- tion at any particular moment, we may indefinitely increase or diminish the force of any one, by dwelling or refusing to dwell upon the thoughts adapted to keep it before our minds. By this spontaneous power, says Dr. Travis, man can gradually mould his character, and is therefore THE RELATIVITY OF MORALITY. 89 wrong, virtue and vice, having no existence but as they affect the wellbeing of the sentient creation. Truth, justice, and wisdom are only relations to finite things, and cannot there- fore be infinite or absolute in their own nature. In the natural world we have strong likes and antipathies, and we call some things nice and others nasty, as they affect us pleasurably or the reverse, but on examination we find a free agent, not in the sense of being able to withdraw himself from the law of causality, but because these acts of attention are one of the causes by which his character at any particular instant is formed. Now, as the Dr. admits that there is "a cause for dwelling or refusing to dwell " and that the spontaneous power is under causality, the difference between him and the necessitarians is evidently a distinction without a difference. " To make Dr. Travis's position thoroughly defensible, (says E. V. N.,) we require to show that there is some internal principle of action belonging to our minds, which accounts for our acts of atten- tion without recourse to any external motive. We think that such a principle may be proved to exist, by the fact that what the mind takes to pieces it has always first put together, that the reflections of thought always relate to previous constructions of the imagination. Our space forbids our doing more than state this principle, which, simple as it may appear, nevertheless casts a marvellous light on many of the obscurest questions of metaphysics, not least on this question of the freedom of the will. Construction implies selection and arrangement. Now these are essentially free acts, because they involve the power of rejection. The bird chooses and combines the materials for its nest according to an idea supplied by its own mind, throwing aside those unsuitable to its purpose. The range of selection may be limited, but within these limits its choice is free. Now in man this constructive power is un- limited. His imagination determines alike ends and means, under the guidance of principles admitting the widest scope, ideas of utility, beauty, harmony, unity, &c. If the will which sways such a faculty is not free, what does freedom mean ? " What indeed ! I should say the absence of any possibility of either reason or science, both of which are built on " law." The very words selection, and arrangement, and rejection, imply a reason for their exercise, that is a governing power to the will. The bird even has its own reasons for what he does, 40 THE PERSISTENCE OF FORCE. them all composed of the same simple elements of oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon; and the same simple forces, or their correlates, acting through different parts of the brain, pro- duce all the phenomena of the moral world. If we love the rose and avoid assafoetida it is not from any supposed free will in the rose to smell sweet and look beautiful, but because its attributes affect us pleasurably. It is the same in the moral world, we judge of things as they affect us, and of people by their attributes. We put the human rose in our bosom, and we avoid the ugly and disagreeable person as we would assafoetida, and for the same reason. We cannot love that which is disagreeable because we know it did not make itself, and the merit we ascribe both to things and persons is according to qualities or attributes without refei*ence to the fact that all qualities are derived. Upon these affections and antipathies, upon our likes and dislikes, our moral systems have been formed, calling that good which affects us pleasurably, and that evil which affects us painfully. It is true we have called things by very high sounding names, and have gone up to Heaven and down to Hell to aid us in force of expression, but the truth of this simple position has not been in the least affected, it has limited we are told, while man's constructive power is unlimited. It may have " the widest scope " but unless it is infinite it cannot he un- limited. It seems that according to E. V. N.'s new principle, of which I am sorry he cannot tell us more, the will sways the determining power, not the determining power the will. It does not matter whether it is an " internal principle of action," or " external motive," that governs the will, and the acts dependent upon it, so that it is governed. Rea- sonable motive ought to govern the will, and the nearer we approach the madman and the idiot the nearer we get to freedom ; not that any one, unless it be the Spectator, supposes even their acts or volitions to be uncaused. MORALITY BASED ON UTILITY. 41 onlv been obscured by thus putting words in the place of things. Language is a most imperfect instrument for the expression of ideas, even with the most philosophical; with the many the names are a part of the things themselves; and as things were named when they were imperfectly known, errors are retained and perpetuated from generation to generation. " All moral rules are derived originally from utility, but the pleasures and pains, or likes and antipathies on which they are based are transmitted to offspring and thus become intuitions, similar to the feelings with which the kitten regards a dog; it sets up its back and spits at it directly it opens its eyes ; the cow also from the same cause, from its having been the custom years ago to bait her fore- fathers, keeps making imaginary tosses of the dog, whenever she sees one ; and the bull himself is still made furious by the sight of a red colour, although the feeling may have been derived ages ago in the bull-fights of Spain. In this way are mixed the tendencies of actions and the feelings with which in a long course of time we intuitively come to regard them, and their original source is thus sometimes lost. What is called the Intuitive School of Moralists bases its conclusions partly on utility, and partly on such internal convictions, for which no reason can be assigned, except a certain feeling on the subject, and which usually takes the shape of * all men think,' ' we cannot help feeling,' &c. To recognize how- ever, the obligations of morality is simply to recognize the conditions on which it is desirable men should live, and the authority is enforced by pains and penalties which all are forced to attend to whether the obligations are recognized and acknowledged or not. "It is often said that it is impossible to speak definitely of the objects of creation, that happiness is not a sufficiently worthy object, but that development seems more the end and 42 THE PERSISTENCE OP FORCE. aim of the Creator than happiness. But what is the use of ' development ' unless attended by consciousness, and that a pleasurable consciousness? a painful consciousness would be worse than nothing. World on world in infinite beauty would be the same as none without beings conscious of their existence, and unless that beauty gave pleasure a happy consciousness, it would be useless. Were a universe de- veloped in all possible power and beauty and but one little fly conscious of its existence, that little fly would be of vastly more importance than the universe. Beings might be ' developed ' in infinite number, size, and power, but of what use would their existence be if they were not happy, or at least a source of happiness? Pain checks development, and all legitimate development is attended with pleasure, and, in fact, we can see no good in development unless it produces happiness. We cannot see or even understand any other purpose in creation : to be without consciousness is the same as not being; and consciouness that was neither pleasurable nor painful would be no consciousness, for there is no negation or state of indifference, no sensation, or feeling, or idea, attending either the intellect or sentiments that is not slightly either one or the other. Certainly pain would not be worth living for, and happiness is the only thing left. People speak of pleasure with contempt, because by it is usually meant something carnal and resulting from the lower feelings, but happiness is simply the aggregate of pleasurable sensation from whatever source derived: again, you hear people decry happiness as poor and paltry, as something scarcely worth having, and speak of blessed- ness as the end to be attained; but by blessedness they evidently mean a refined kind of happiness, composed prin- cipally of the religious and aesthetic feelings. We hear much also in the present day of ' Law, Order, and Unity ; ' but MORAL BESPONSIBILITY. 43 law, order and unity, that serve no purpose, are no evidence of wisdom of design.' * * * The obligation, then, that a man is under to act in one way rather than in another, is owing to its tendency to happiness or to the avoidance of pain, and Morality may be defined as the ' the science which teaches men to live together in the most happy manner possible.' (Helvetius.y * Bentham says, "No man ever had, can, or could have a motive differing from the pursuit of pleasure or the avoidance of pain." J. S. Mill says, " A volition is a moral effect, which follows the corresponding moral causes as certainly and invariably as physical effects follow their physical causes." To present these moral causes then is the object of the moralist. " To prove that the immoral action is a miscal- culation of self-interest ; to show how erroneous an estimate the vicious man makes of pains and pleasures, is the purpose of the intelligent moralist." Bentham. Man's freedom con- sists in being able to do as he pleases, which is all-sufficient; the object then must be to present such motives as will make him please to do that which will be most for the lasting interest of himself and society. MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. But if no action of our lives in the then state of our minds, and the circumstances in which we were placed, could have been different, what 'be- comes of our Accountability or Responsibility ? It consists in the consequences of our actions, which are pleasurable or painful as they are right or wrong, that is, as they tend to benefit or injure ourselves or society. It is for the moralist then to guard, and if necessary to increase, these pains and pleasures, and as man necessarily seeks that which is plea- surable and avoids that which is painful, the interests of * Philosophy of Necessity, p. 87 to 89-90. 44 THE PERSISTENCE OF FOECE. morality are sufficiently assured. But if all actions are the same, per se, and could not possibly have been otherwise under the circumstances, what have we to preach about? What becomes of sin and iniquity, &c. ? All that may be safely buried, and all we have to do in morals as in physics, is to show the consequences of our actions. The laws of morality are as fixed, and determinate, and unvarying, as are those that keep the planets in their sphere. The common and erroneous idea of Kesponsibilty of man's being an accountable agent is the rightfulness of in- flicting punishment, that is, of apportioning a certain amount of suffering to a certain amount of sin, which he is supposed to have desemed because he could have done differently; but as this is not the case as he could not have acted dif- ferently, all responsibility in this sense would be unjust, and as such actions are already past and could not be recalled, it would be as useless as unjust. The pains and penalties, or punishments, attending our actions, are for our good; to show us when we have done wrong, that is, done that which will injure us ; and to prevent our doing it again ; and we are so punished whether our actions are voluntary or not, that is, whether they are what is called free, or merely accidental. Whether we fall into the fire or put ourselves in voluntarily, the pain is the same, the object being to make us get out again as soon as possible and thus avert the consequences of being burned. It is the same in other penalties, whether the pains are those of conscience or merely bodily. Forgive- ness of sins then, or to be relieved from that punishment which is for our good, would be simply doing us an injury, and not to forgive, if no good comes from punishment, would be mere vengeance. The myriads of human beings whom, it is said, God has " fore-ordained," that is, designed beforehand, to be punished to all eternity, " to the praise of his glorious ETERNAL PUNISHMENT. 45 justice," as the "Westminster Confession has it*, may con- sistently with that justice be safely released. Moral Respon- sibility, so much contended for, is merely the supposed right to take revenge for injuries done to us. * See also the sermon of Jonathan Edwards, the unanswerable champion of Philosophical Necessity, on the " Justice of God in the damnation of Sinners," and the diary of Mr. Carey on the " pleasure" and " sweetness " he had experienced in reading that sermon. Surely Free Will would be a most undesirable gift if accompanied by such possible consequences ; surely God could never make his crea- tures " free " thus to injure themselves irretrievably ! Infinite power and benevolence and eternal punishments are contradictions. But men are better than their creeds, they do not realize or really believe this horrid dogma ; if they did it would put a stop to all action in this world who could go about his daily work with such a possible doom hanging over him? or who but a selfish brute beast, acting upon mere brute instinct, would dare to bring children into the world whose possible and even probable fate was endless torment. To me it appears the blackest libel on the name of the Creator that Hell itself could invent, and wherever we find that the doctrine is received in any seriousness, it has, as we might expect, the most brutalizing tendency. Mr. Lecky, in his History of Rationalism, shows how completely this effect was produced in Scotland in the sixteenth century, in the torturing and burning of supposed witches, and in persecution generally. He says : " The Reformed clergy all over Scotland applauded and stimulated the persecution. The ascendancy they had obtained was boundless ; and in this respect their power was entirely undisputed. One word from them might have arrested the tortures, but that word- was never spoken. Their conduct implies not merely a mental aberration, but also a callousness of feeling which has rarely been attained in a long career of vice. Yet these were men who had often shown, in the most trying circumstances, the highest and the most heroic virtues. They were men whose courage had never flinched when persecution was raging around men who had never paltered with their consciences to attain the favour of a king men whose self-devotion and zeal in their sacred calling had seldom been surpassed men who, in all the private relations of life, were doubtless amiable and affectionate. It is not on them that our blame should fall : it is on the system that made them what they were. They were but illustrations of the great truth, that when men have come to regard a certain class of their fellow creatures 46 THE PERSISTENCE OF FORCE. As motives govern our volitions, we praise or blame, reward or punish, as motives to induce one line of conduct rather than another. A man who sets up his free will and refuses to be governed by motives is either a madman or a fool, and his actions are not the less caused. If a man could refuse to be governed by the strongest motive, all moral influences, and praise and blame, would be useless, and all reasoning upon his conduct impossible, for we should never be able to predict what he would do from what he had done. We judge of acts by their tendency; but as all mental action originates in motives, it is by motives that character must be judged, and an act is moral, not because it is free, but because it arises in moral motives. as doomed by the Almighty to eternal and excruciating agonies, and when their theology directs their minds with intense and realizing ear- nestness to the contemplation of such agonies, the result will be an indifference to the suffering of those whom they deem the enemies of their God, as absolute as it is perhaps possible for human nature to attain." Of course under such a dogma, if only half believed, intolerance and persecution become the highest duty, and all human sympathy must be made to stand aside. The Spaniards, .with their Inquisition, and the Scotch, only showed that they were more earnest in their belief than other nations who professed to hold the same faith. Mr. Lecky says, " If men believe with an intense and untiring faith that their own view of a disputed question is true beyond all possibility of mistake if they further believe that those who adopt other views will be doomed by the Almighty to an eternity of misery, which with the same moral des- peration, but with a different belief, they would have escaped, these men will, sooner or later, persecute to the extent of their power. If you Bpeak to them of the physical and moral sufferings which persecution produces, or of the sincerity and unselfish heroism of its victims, they will reply that such arguments rest altogether on the inadequacy of your realization of the doctrine they believe what suffering that men can inflict can be comparable to the eternal misery of all who embrace the doctrine of the heretic ? what claim can human virtues have to our forbearance, if the Almighty punishes the mere profession of error as a crime of the deepest turpitude ? " CHAPTEE III. UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. " And what if all of animated nature Be but organic heaps diversely framed, That tremble into thought, as over them sweeps, Plastic and vast, one intellectual breeze, At once the soul of each, and God of all ? " Coleridge. " Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was : and the spirit shall return to God who gave it." Ecclesiastes. " In all phenomena the more closely they are investigated the more we are convinced that, humanly speaking, neither matter nor force can be created or annihilated, and that an essential cause is unattainable. Causation is the will, Creation the act of God." W. R. Grove. Corre- lation of Physical Forces. should have no grounds for supposing that matter existed if matter did not exert force, and the popular idea is, that matter could be separated from this force, or from its manifestations or accidents, and that the laws which govern matter are external to itself. But, as we have seen, it is most probable that the force, or manifestations, or accidents, or laws, are all that really exists. Our faculties make us acquainted with qualities or attri- butes without ourselves, and we assume that these must be qualities or attributes of something, and we have called it Matter; we have feelings and ideas, and we equally assume that they also must belong to something, and we call it 48 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. Mind ; but there is in reality nothing to which these mental and physical attributes belong, they exist per se as force and its correlates. THEBE is NOTHING UNDERLYING PHENOMENA PHENOMENA ARE CORRELATES OF FORCE, AND FORCE is ALL. When we speak of Qualities, we indicate only how we are affected by Force external; vital force is the correlate of this physical force ; and ideas and feelings are the correlate of vital force, not existing m anything, but each idea or feeling existing separately ; and when it ceases to exist as an idea or feeling, it merely takes some other form, and is still persistent. What form it may possibly take we shall speculate upon in another chapter. Hume says, " Since all our perceptions are different from each other, and from every- thing else in the universe, they are also distinct and separable, and may be considered as separably existent, and may exist separately, and have no need of anything else to support their existence." And again, "We have no perfect idea of any- thing but a perception. A substance is entirely different from a perception. We have therefore no idea of a substance. Inhesion in something is supposed to be requisite to support the existence of our perceptions. * Nothing appears requisite to support the existence of our perceptions. We have there- fore no idea of inhesion. What possibility, then, of answering that question, Whether perceptions inhere in a material or immaterial substance, when we do not so much as understand the meaning of the question ? * It would appear then, that that which underlies phenomena, and the phenomena the noumenon and the phenomenon the non-ego and the ego in their Inmost Nature are the same ; that is, " Mind and Matter are only phenomenal modifications of the same common substance," viz., of force. This is the true doctrine of * A Treatise of Human Nature, vol. i., p. 311, et. seq. POWER NOT SEPARABLE FROM GOD. 49 "Absolute Identity," taught in another form by Schelling, Hegel, and Cousin. " There is no fact," says Fichte, " no Tree there, but only a manifestation of Power from something that is not 7," that is, a certain amount of force was received into the system, and, meeting other forces from without, was changed into that compound idea called a tree, and having done that, would pass into some other form or modification. There is not, however, an Absolute Identity between the external power and the idea of the tree, since to complete the idea other powers are supplied from within, or from the ego. The thing known and the mind knowing are one in quality or essence, but not in quantity. We find then but one thing in the world, Force; and what is that? Force and Power are the same, and Power we cannot separate from that source of all power, from God, Power is God. We say the power of God, as if it could be separated from Him, or delegated; but this is clearly incon- ceivable. The one only thing we find anywhere is God. The fundamental principle in the doctrine of Spinoza is the simplicity of the Universe, and the unity of that sub- stance, in which he supposes both thought and matter to inhere. He says, " Whatever we discover externally by sensation ; whatever we feel internally by reflection ; all these are nothing but modifications of that one simple and necessarily existent being, and are not possessed of any separate and distinct existence."* "There is but one infinite Substance, and that is God. Whatever is, is in God ; and without Him nothing can be conceived. He is the universal Being of which all things are the manifestations. * * * Extension and Thought are the objective and subjective, of which God is the Identity. Every thing is a mode of God's attribute of Extension; every thought, wish, or feeling, a mode * Home on Human Nature, vol. i., p. 319. 60 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. of his attribute of Thought. *#'."* God is the one 'idea immanens' the One and All."* The one infinite Substance and the "Force" of our modern Scientific conceptions are identical, and the question is, what do we and can we actually know of it ? First, then, Science shows its Unity. " The simplest germination of a lichen is," says Lewes, "if we apprehend it rightly, directly linked with the grandest astronomical phenomena; nor could an infusory animalcule be annihilated without altering the equilibrium of the universe. Plato had some forecast of this when he taught that the world was a great animal ; and others, since Plato, when they considered the universe the manifestation of some transcendent life, with which every separate individual life was related, as parts are to the whole." Emerson says, " Every thing in nature contains all the powers of nature; everything is made of one hidden stuff. The true doctrine of Omnipresence is, that God re-appears in all his parts, in every moss and cobweb; thus the Universe is alive." The Rev. J. White Mailler, M.A., says, "When we view the world as one universal effect, we are at once led to the contemplation of a universal Divine Agency. Does not the Infinite act on every atom ? God never delegates his power ; He cannot transfer divinity to a substance : there is no power therefore separate from Himself. In Him all things have their being, "f Science, then, proves the Unity of* Force ; throughout the Universe, as far as our observation extends, every atom is pulling at every other atom; it also equally shows that it is not what we call dead, passive, or blind force, but universally active and intelligent, that is, it partakes of the attributes which * Lewes' History of Philosophy, vol. iii., p. 146. + The Philosophy of the Bible, pp. 35 and 40. FOKCE NOT BLIND BUT INTELLIGENT. 61 we ascribe only to mind. If the One simple, homogeneous substance or force did not partake of the nature of mind, what could at first have originated change in it ? whereas we now know it to be the cause of all things, and that all these changes tend to definite purposes. We are accustomed only to acribe Intelligence to sensitive beings, whereas every atom is equally intelligent and tending towards a given purpose*, and one is no more an independent agency than the other, for all things that begin to be, whether in mind or matter, must have a cause why they begin to be, and they are not therefore self-existent, but the foundation of their existence must be without themselves, and the intelligence shown in either mind or atom is no part of either, but is something separate and beyond. There is nothing in nature exercising an inde- pendent agency. A cause must be uncaused ; if produced as all things around us by the persistence of force, it is an effect. There can be only one cause, therefore, and all the rest are passive results. All things in nature being thus derived, the original from which they are derived must exist somewhere. This is what we call the Great First Cause. " The meaning of a First Cause is, (says Mill,) that all other things exist, and are what they are by reason of it * " There lies all the difficulties about these atoms. These same ' relations ' in which they stand to one another are anything but simple ones. They involve all the 'ologies' and all the ' ometries,' and in these days we know something of what that implies. Their movements, their interchanges, their ' hates and loves,' their 'attractions and repiilsions,' their ' correlations,' their what not, are all determined on the very instant. There is no hesitation, no blundering, no trial and error. * * * The presence of MIXD is what solves the whole difficulty; so far, at least, as it brings it within the sphere of our own consciousness, and into conformity with our own experience of what action is." Sir J. F. W. Herschel. 52 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. and of its properties, but that it is not itself made to exist, nor to be what it is, by anything else. It does not depend for its existence or attributes, on other things: there is nothing upon the existence of which its own is conditional: it exists absolutely." * But there are those who say that there is no First Cause, but that the chain of causation goes back to all eternity an infinite non- commencement. They assert that qualities and properties and attributes are inherent, that they have always existed, and they see no evidence of purpose or design in creation, but think that in the infinite concourse and commingling of atoms or forces in infinite time and space, the present order of things has arisen; everything inharmo- nious having a natural and necessary tendency to destroy itself, and only that which is good and harmonious being permanent or having power to continue in existence at all. But even supposing qualities to be inherent, and laws, or the longest observed order of facts, to be necessary and permanent, still it is difficult to see how anything but chance could result from the joint action of one set of laws upon another, if force were blind. It is with results, and not with the primary laws or qualities that we have to do. Sir John Herschel tells us, that "among all the possible combinations of the fifty or sixty elements which che- mistry points to as existing on this earth, that some have never yet been formed" and who can say, when such com- bination does take place what the result will be? It may take a million chances to effect one purpose an almost infinite series to bring about one reciprocity, and then one more turn of the necessary screw one adverse combination, might take us back to chaos. " No one law determines anything that we see happening or done around us. It is * Mill on Hamilton, p. 36. THE COMBINATION OF FORCES. 53 always the result of differing or opposing forces nicely balanced against each other. The least disturbance of the proportion in which any one of them is allowed to tell, produces a total change in the effect. The more we know of nature, the more intricate do such combinations appear to be. The existence of laws, therefore, is not the end of our physical knowledge. What we always reach at last in the course of every physical inquiry, is the recognition, not of individual laws, but of some definite relation to each other, in which different laws are placed, so as to bring about a particular result. But this is, in other words, the principle of adjust- ment, and adjustment has no meaning except as the instru- ment and the result of purpose. * * * The motion of the earth might be exactly what it is, every fact in respect to our planetary position might remain unchanged, yet the seasons would return in vain if our own atmosphere were altered in any one of the elements of its composition, or if any one of the laws regulating its action were other than it is. Under a thinner air even the torrid zone might be wrapped in eternal snow. Under a denser air, and one with different refracting powers, the earth and all that is therein might be burnt up. * * * Then, the relations in which these inorganic compounds stand to the. che- mistry of life, constitute another vast series in which the principle of adjustment has applications infinite in number, and as infinite in ^beauty. How delicate these relations are, and how tremendous are the issues depending on their management, may be conceived from a single fact. The same elements combined in one proportion are sometimes a nutritious food or a grateful stimulant, soothing and sus- taining the powers of life ; whilst, combined in another proportion, they may be a deadly poison, paralysing the heart and carrying agony along every nerve and fibre of 54 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. the animal frame. This is no mere theoretical possibility. It is actually the relation in which two well-known sub- stances stand to each other Tea and Strychnia. The active principle of these two substances, " Theine " and "Strychnine," are identical so far as their elements are concerned, and differ from each other only in the proportions in which they are combined. Such is the power of numbers in the laboratory of Nature ! What havoc in this world, so full of life, would be made by blind chance gambling with such powers as these!"* It is impossible to conceive that inherent forces working blindly could produce the unity of purpose we everywhere see, or if by a million chances to one they did, what is to secure its permanence ? Were properties inherent, then it would be impossible to escape the conviction that there is a higher force controlling then" individual tendencies ; but recent science shows that there is nothing inherent : the very name itself implies that such forces are inherited or derived. The force, or rather " form" in an acorn, by which it can only become an oak, or the difference between an acorn and the seed of a scarlet runner or a gourd, is, as we have seen, dependent upon organization, which is derived from the parent stock. Even what we call properties, and which are assumed to be inhe- rent, are, as we have seen, formed in the mind itself, the result of organization. The law of the Persistence of Force and the law of Evolution are the same. Every existing state has grown out of the preceding, and all its forces have been used up in present phenomena, the change from physical to sentient and mental greatly increasing with each succeeding age; as Oersted says, " Everything that exists depends upon the past, prepares the future, and is related to the whole." * The Reign of Law. By the Duke of Argyle. Good Words. CAUSE AND EFFECT NOT A NECESSAKY CONNECTION. 55 Comte is of opinion that, when properly converted to the positive mode of thought, " mankind will cease to refer the constitution of Nature to an intelligent will and Supreme Governor of the world;" on the contrary, Science finds only a universe of effects, nothing is what it is in itself, everything is derived; the Universal Cause is everywhere without, not inherent, and what we see the Vital Force is to the Acorn, we may suppose God is to the Universe. Oersted says, " The world is governed by an eternal reason, which makes known to us its actions by unalterable laws." It is true the Laws of Nature are unalterable, but is the connection between each cause and effect a necessary one, or dependent only upon the volition of the Eternal Reason? Those who believe in inherent properties believe also in an indissoluble necessary connection. But Hume is supposed to have clearly shown that there is no proof whatever of any necessary connection ; but that all we know and can speak of is the invariableness ; and J. S. Mill says, " What experience makes known, is the fact of the invariable sequence between every event and some special combination of antecedent conditions, in such sort that wherever and whenever that union of antecedents exists, the event does not fail to occur. Any must in this case, any necessity, other than the unconditional universality of the fact, we know nothing of." And again, "Whether it must do so, I acknowlege myself to be entirely ignorant, be the phenomenon moral or physical; and I condemn, accordingly, the word Necessity as applied to either case. All I know is, that it always does."* But if we can show why it always does; that the connection is a moral rather than a physical one ; then I think the higher probability is that such invariable connection has been established to answer a special purpose, and is not necessary, but in other * Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy, pp. 500, 501. 56 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. circumstances might be dissolved. All the purposes in creation evidently point to one object the production of the largest amount of sensitive existence. The whole surface of the earth is one net- work of nerves, so that, as in the human body, so in the body of the world, you can scarcely insert the point of a needle where there is no sentience. Life is always preserved at a high pressure. " There is no exception to the rule," says Darwin, " that every organic being naturally increases at so high a rate, that if not destroyed, this earth would soon be covered by the progeny of a single pair." Without respect to individuals, the object seems to be to keep the greatest number possible in the best possible state for enjoyment : " So careful of the type she seems, So careless of the single life." Now the enjoyment, and indeed we may say the existence of this mass of life, depends upon the uniformity of nature's laws. The exercise of the highest reasoning power in man, equally with the lowest instinct of the brute, depends upon the order of nature to-day being as yesterday; upon the being able to calculate what will be from what has been ; upon the delicate relationship between instinct and object being sustained. It has been said " That the testimony of con- sciousness must be believed, because to disbelieve it, would be to impute mendacity and perfidy to the Creator," but Locke truly observes, " How short soever our knowledge may be of a universal or perfect comprehension of whatever is, it yet secures our great concernments," and that " God has given us assurance enough as to the existence of things with- out us; since by their different application we can produce in ourselves both pleasure and pain." In fact in whatever way the world is created within us, and however far short our DEATH THE PARENT OF LIFE. 57 consciousness may come of absolute truth, our relation to the outer world is quite sufficient to guide us to the objects of our desires, upon the gratification of which our happiness depends ; our consciousness is therefore no deception, but all that is necessary, and all that it was intended to be; but if after attaining that knowledge of the " order of nature," upon which our safety and wellbeing depended, that order were changed, or altered, or interfered with, by what is called Free Will, or a special Providence, that would certainly be a breach of faith. Whether then the connection between cause and effect in the order of nature be a necessary one, or mere invariable ante- cedence and consequence, it is certainly desirable for all the purposes of life that such connection should be unaltered and unalterable, it is therefore most probably established and maintained by the Will of the Creator; based upon the volition of the Absolute. We find, then, but one infinite Substance, and that is the same with the Force or Power we see everywhere around us. We find only Force changing into Life, and Life into Sen- tience a great aggregated pleasurable Consciousness guarded by pain. Death and Birth are the great waste and repro- ductive system of this great Sentient body, and the one is as necessary as the other, as Death may be said to be the Parent of Life.* Advancing Science shows that the Cosmos, both sentient and insentient, is one and indivisible, and viewed in this light, as a whole it is ever progressing towards increasing happiness. By the Natural law of Progress, called " Natural Selection," the weak and bad and ugly are con- stantly making room for the strong and good and beautiful. Pleasure is the rule, pain the exception, and the aggregate of * " There is no death in the concrete, what passes away passes away into its own self only the passing away passes away. The con- sciousness abides the essential being Is." Hegel. . 58 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. pleasurable sensation constitutes happiness, and this taken as a whole must be sufficient completely to obliterate the pain, which man calls evil.* Thus the warp and woof of the Mind of God may be made up of the totality of the individual threads of con- sciousness, extending through the countless worlds of which this is a mere speck a grain of sand. " The phenomenal is the life of the Absolute." I am not disposed, therefore, to join men of science in their Altar to " The Unknown and Unknowable God," because I cannot separate God from *' Man in judging of the purposes of creation and of what he calls evil, confines his strictures either to himself individually, or at the widest range to that of the human race. In both he errs, he must take in the whole of sentient existence. Theodore Parker supplies an admirable illustration of this limitation of our view. Thus, " An oak tree in the woods appears quite perfect. The leaves are coiled up and spoiled by the leaf-roller ; cut to pieces by the tailor beetle ; eaten by the hay-moth and the polyphemus, the slug, caterpillar, and her nu- merous kindred; the twigs are su<5ked by the white-lined tree-hopper, or cut off by the oak-pruner ; large limbs are broken down by the seven- teen-year locust ; the horn-bug, the curculio, and the timber-beetle, eat up its wood ; the gadfly punctures leaf and bark, converting the forces of the tree to that insect's use ; the grub lies in the young acorn ; fly- catchers are on its leaves : a spider weaves its web from twig to twig ; caterpillars of various denominations gnaw its tender shoots ; the creeper and the wood-pecker bore through the bark; squirrels, striped, flying, red, and grey, have gnawed into its limbs, and made their nests ; the toad has a hole in a flaw in its base ; the fox has cut asunder its fibrous roots in digging bis burrow ; the bear dwells in its trunk, which worms, emmets, bees, and countless insects have helped to hollow : ice and the winds of winter have broken off full many a bough. How imperfect and incomplete the oak tree looks, so broken, gnarled, and grim ! ... But it has served its complicated purpose ; ... no doubt the good God is quite content with His oak, and says : ' Well done, good and faithful servant ! ' " We commonly look on the world as the carpenter and millwright on that crooked oak : and because it does not serve our turn completely, we think it an imperfect world." THE WORLD A MANIFESTATION OF GOD. 59 Nature, but believe that what we can learn of one, we know also of the other : I would simply transfer our Theology, as distinguished from Religion, from the Pulpit to the Lecture- room. Our Priests must be one with our men of science, our Prophets are the Poets : their Inspiration tells us truly that: " All are but parts of one stupendous whole, Whose body nature is, and God the soul." " These as they change, Almighty Father, these, Are but the varied God." " But wandering oft, with brute unconscious gaze, Man marks not thee," &c. To him who thus " sees God in clouds and hears him in the wind," who cannot separate Him from one atom of the living universe of which he is the author and supporter, the orthodox, but ignorant disparagement of this beautiful world, appears impious, libellous, and above all things un- grateful. On this subject the ancient Hindoo and Greek mind arrived at the same results. They came to the conclusion, as we learn from the profound and condensed work of Dr. J. W. Draper, that the world is a manifestation of God, emanating from Him, and being re-absorbed into Him again ; they held also, that the soul is immortal, but as it issued from the Deity so would it be re-absorbed. "As a drop of water pursues a devious course in the cloud, in the rain, in the river, a part of a plant, or a part of an animal, but sooner or later inevitably finds its way back to the sea from which it came, so the soul, however various its fortunes may have been, sinks back at last into the Divinity from which it emanated." A little rivulet of force has been taken from the general ocean to turn our little mill ; it again hastens 60 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. back to regain its source, again and again to be raised by the Great Sun to go its round as before. Man's early intuitions made him feel that everything was the work of the Great Spirit; now his intuitions, generally so right at first, are obscured by secondary causes which he calls science and laws of nature ; and thus " Nature, which is the Time- vesture of God, and reveals Him to the wise, hides Him from the foolish."* * The following letter from Mr. H. G-. Atkinson, P. G. S., which I have permission to insert, may I think interest many of my readers: " I have been deep into the mystery of things this morning comparing Plato with the Kahbalah. One thing occurs to me as funda- mental to almost all religious schemes and principles of faith, including the modern spiritualists, that the form of the faith or creed is little more than a mere reflex of the course of nature as we observe it about us and within us. At one time we have a God representing the first principles of things, as a man or an architect framing the universe and Father of all mankind. And again, the Great Frst Cause is proclaimed to be a profound mystery and hidden secret. The unknown and unknowable of philosophers and men of science and the En Soph of the Kabbalah, and inconceivable Trinity in Unity of the Christian representing the secret subtle source or principle of action and formative power in nature. And even could we discover the nature of God, says Plato, it would be impossible to explain it ; and yet he tells you that God is mind acting upon matter, somewhat after the manner of a watchmaker milking a watch the intractible nature of the material being the origin of evil; with arguments for the immortality of the soul, not very logically con- vincing. But in the Kabbalah we have the original cause without mind, representing insensible matter, from out of which mind develops. Now these different ideas do but reflect the form and nature of things about us. The fact and process of observed natural action either in respect to our own nature or the nature without us, and in a roundabout way we have simply emanations falling back again upon their source, and as in the Kabbalah and with the Buddhist, a longing for peace in rest and eternal sleep a re-absorption, and in fact annihilation as the end most devoutly to be wished ; in fact the getting quit of ourselves as a very good riddance to bad rubbish, and which is actually the sum and sub- stance of the pervading idea of the Buddhist religion. And the notion forcibly presents itself to my mind, that it is the tendency under an NATURE AN INFINITELY DIVIDED GOD. 61 The ^highest minds seem everywhere to have come, by very different roads, very much to similar conclusions : thus Schelling says, " The world is but a balancing of con- tending powers within the sphere of the absolute." The Ego in Fechte's system is a finite Ego it is the human soul. In Schiller's it is the Absolute the Infinite the all which Spinoza called Substance ; and this Absolute manifests itself in two forms : in the form of the Ego and in the form of the Non-Ego as Nature and as Mind. The Ego produces the Non-Ego, but not by its own force, not out of its own nature ; it is the universal Nature which works within us and which produces from out of us ; it is the universal Nature which here is conscious of itself. Men are but the innu- merable individual eyes with which the Infinite World-spirit beholds himself.* Schiller says "Nature is an infinitely ignorance of real causes and the sources of particular effects, to mis- take (as in the belief in ghosts and spirits, extraneous or sympa- thetic) the effects for causes, and hence we have the affections ascribed to the heart, and called heart to this day; whilst the actor upon the stage still puts his hand to his heart as a natural action in the expression of the warmth of his affections, though no such action is ever observed in real life. Plato plants ' the irascible passions which originate in pride and resentment,' in the breast, because under their action sensations are experienced in that region ; ' the love of pleasure or concupiscent part of the soul,' he seats in the belly and inferior parts of the body-"-, taking the means for the origin or ' final cause', &c. ; but in placing the reasoning and judging powers in the head as ' a firm citadel, and of which the senses are its guides and servants,' he was right, because every man is sensible of the fact now verified by so many other tests and reasons ; and without being misled by the sympathy with other parts of the system. To collect, analyse, and record all such specious notions and speculative anticipations misleading illusions of long ages of error, before the true principles of a real science burst upon us, is extremely interesting and profoundly instructive." * Lewes's Biographical History of Philosophy, vol. iv., p. 189. 62 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. divided God," and again, " The Divine One has dispersed itself into innumerable sensible substances, as a white beam of light is decomposed by the prism into seven coloured rays. And a divine being would be evolved from the union of all these substances, as the seven coloured rays dissolve again into the clear-light beam. The existing form of nature is the optic glass, and all the activities of spirit are only an infinite colour-play of that simple divine ray. Should it ever please the Almighty to shatter this prism, then the barrier between himself and the world would fall to ruin ; all spirits would disappear into one infinite spirit, all accords would melt into one harmony, all streams would rest in one ocean. The attraction of the elements gave to nature its material form. The attraction of spirits, multiplied and continued to infinity, must finally lead to the abolition of the separation, or (may I utter it,) create God."* The Universe, according to Hegel, is a thought, a beat, a pulse, of the Absolute Mind. * * * In the minutest act of our mind is the same secret logical, physical, meta- physical as in the entire Universe.! And again, "Being underlies all modes and forms of being," and in creation, "Being Becomes." Emerson says, "Everything in nature contains all the powers of nature ; everything is made of one hidden stuff. The true doctrine of Omnipresence is, that God reappears in all his parts in every moss and cobweb ; thus the universe is alive." J Theodore Parker says, "If God be In- finite, then he must be imminent, perfectly and totally present in Nature and in Spirit. Thus there is no point in space, no atom of matter, but God is there ; no point of spirit, no atom of soul, but God is there. And yet finite matter and finite * Philosophical Letter, p. 40. + Masson's Recent British Philosophy, p. 279. J Essay on Compensation. GOD IS ALL IN ALL. 68 spirit do not exhaust God. He transcends the world of matter and of spirit ; and in virtue of that transcendence continually makes the world of matter fairer, and the world of spirit wiser. So there is really a progress in the manifestation of God, not a progress in God the manifesting." Professor Ferrier, of St. Andrew's, says, "All absolute existences are contingent except one; in other words, there is One, but only one, Absolute Existence which is strictly necessary; and that existence is a supreme and infinite and everlasting Mind in synthesis with all things."* Carlyle also : " This fair universe, in the meanest pro- vince thereof, is in very deed the star-domed City of God ; through every star, through every grass-blade, and most through every living soul, the glory of a present God still beams : But Nature, which is the Time-vesture of God, and reveals Him to the wise, hides Him from the foolish." f The Christian doctrine is, that "In Him (God) we live and move and have our being." That God is all in all, and the Devil something besides, is only the unanswerable logic of the pulpit. I * Institutes of Metaphysics : The Theory of Knowing and Being. + Sartor Resartus, p. 274. J We are told repeatedly by those who support this influence or personage that we are not to rest in second causes, and yet they make the Devil the " Origin of Evil " and not his Maker. The fact is that a Being who is always in pursuit of pain, that is, of evil, who, with above ordinary intelligence, is always systematically acting in opposition to his own interest, is an impossibility. We know of no creature who is not seeking the greatest apparent good, in the " pursuit of pleasure or the avoidance of pain." God is the Great First Cause the Author of all things, and if He could have made a world like this earth, with all the happiness it now contains, without pain, no doubt he would have done so. We must limit either His Goodness or His Power, and we prefer the latter, as it is not derogatory to the character of God that he cannot perform impossibilities. He could not make that not to have 64 UPON THAT WHICH UNDEBLIES ALL PHENOMENA. The Duke of Argjle, in the admirable paper on the Reign of Law, from which we have already quoted, says : " Science, in the modern doctrine of the Conservation of Energy, and Convertibility of Forces, is already getting something like a firm hold of the idea that all kinds of force are but forms and manifestations of some one central Force, issuing from some one fountain-head of power. Sir John Herschel has not hesitated to say that ' it is but reasonable to regard the force of gravitation as the direct or indirect result of a conscious- ness and a will existing somewhere.' And even if we cannot assume that force, in all its forms, is due to the direct working of the Creator, at least let us not think or speak of the forces of nature as if they were independent of, or even separate from, His Power. * * * Nothing is more remarkable in the present state of physical research than what may be called the transcendental character of its results. And what is transcendentalism but the tendency to trace up all things to the relation in which they stand to abstract ideas? And what is this but to bring all physical phenomena nearer and nearer into relation with the phenomena of mind? The old speculations of philosophy which cut the ground from materialism by showing how little we know of matter, are now being daily reinforced by the subtle analysis of the physi- ologist, the chemist, and the electrician. Under that analysis matter dissolves and disappears, surviving only as the phe- nomena of Force ; which again is seen converging along all its lines to some common centre sloping through darkness up to God." * * * Creation by Law Evolution by Law been, which has been, or the half equal to the whole, or give finite beings infinite attributes, which is the same thing. Limited intelligence therefore must be always liable to error, and we cannot conceive of a more effectual check to error than pain. BISHOP BERKELEY. 65 Development by Law, or as including all these kindred ideas, the Reign of Law, is nothing but the Reign of Creative Force, directed by Creative Knowledge, worked under the control of Creative Power, and in fulfilment of Creative Purpose." Mr. R. S. Wyld, in a paper read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh, says, " Recent discoveries have established that heat is mechanical force, the two being mutually convertible without loss. The attraction of gravity and chemical attrac- tions and repulsions are all the same physical force, and the entire external world is nothing but a manifestation of it, a simple and grand conception, and one which enters alike the domain of physics, of speculative philosophy, and of theology, and which in all of these sciences is equally important. It represents the external world and its Creator as possessed of one immaterial and spiritual essence power and intelligence being the attributes of the Creator, and power subordinate and sustained the characteristic of the Creation." * Bishop Berkeley holds that Deity inspires or causes the various mental sensations, and that there is no external world ; Mr. Wyld that there is no such thing as matter, but that the world is a manifestation of Divine power exhibited in space so that the outer world has a real existence. For myself, I am not able to see how it is possible to separate thfe power of God from God himself; this conception may suit the exigencies of an ethical creed not based on Law, but as mind and matter are only the phenomenal modifications of the same common substance, so God and the power of God are equally inseparable, and I know nothing of poicer subordinate and sustained as something * On the World as a Dynamical and Immaterial World. Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. v., 1864-5. No. 67, p. 387. F 66 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. separate from the Creator Himself. I can arrive at no other conclusion but that God and Nature the Creator and the Creation are One and Indivisible. And need we fear to accept this conclusion ? If we have God manifest in the flesh, surely the Universe in its Unity and Beauty is a not less worthy representation of the Absolute. " All we see is but the vesture of God, and what we call laws of Nature are attributes of Deity."* We feel that : " The awful shadow of some unseen Power Floats tho' unseen among us." Shelley. " And I have felt A presence that disturbs me with the joy Of elevated thoughts ; a sense sublime Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns, And the round ocean, and the living air, And the blue sky, and in the mind of man : A motion and a spirit that impels All thinking things, all objects of all thought, And rolls through all things." Wordsworth. " There lives and works A soul in all things, and that soul is God." Cowper. " Earth, ocean, air, beloved brotherhood ! If our great Mother have imbued my soul With aught of natural piety to feel Your love, and recompense the boon with mine ; If dewy morn, and odorous noon, and even, With sunset and its gorgeous ministers, And solemn midnight's tingling silentness ; If autumn's hollow sighs in the sere wood, And winter robing with pure snow and crowns Of starry ice the grey grass and bare boughs * Philosophy of Necessity, p. 445. THE NEW PANTHEISM. 67 If spring's voluptuous pantings when she breathes Her first sweet kisses, have been dear to me ; no bright bird, insect, or gentle beast, I consciously have injured, but still loved And cherished these my kindred; then forgive This boast, beloved brethren, and withdraw No portion of your wonted favour now !" Shelley. " Neither is it only to the Old Pantheism, and nothing more, that we have been destined to return after all ; but surely to something much higher : something higher, in degree at least, if not in kind, than that to which the purest wisdom of antiquity was able to attain. For the self-knowledge which we may now say that our whole of Nature has gained of itself, is that it is the farthest possible from being entitled to claim absolutely for itself the proud name of the Whole of Things! That is to say, the utmost that man is enabled to embrace even in his vaguest conceptions, is immeasurably inferior to the actual to pan. Out- side and beyond that which is the Whole to us, is always the unknown and unknowable that belongs to GOD only. The clear separation of the ideas, the Whole that is our's, and the Whole that is not our's, but that includes our's as a part, is our great gain over those highest minds of antiquity that may still have been dimly conscious of it. That Deity which was the Pan in the highest form to the philosophic world in general, has become to us subordinate to the still higher conception of the Divine Mystery that never can be unveiled to men. "And the lower domain of Pantheism, that which we call lower because it is accessible, though to them it was the higher because they had yet no means of estimating the degrees of remoteness : this present belief which has come again to agree with that of Old, in recognizing that through the entirety of the Universe exists the whole of Deity that we can either know or conceive, has at the same time the advantage over it, by all that the ages of experience have added. It is a Pantheism which contains within itself the rich contents of all the Religions and all the Philosophies the world has hitherto possessed ; and yet farther, having the power now seen to be contained in it, the blessed necessity, of going on to make more and better ! Say we are returned to a parallel condition with that of the world in the time of Xenophanes ; what is there other than reason for rejoicing if we have also before us, in pro- phetic anticipation, a parallel repetition to be undergone, on a higher stage, of that succession of reigning mythologies whose early phase has 68 UPON THAT WHICH UNDERLIES ALL PHENOMENA. imprinted so much of permanent delight in 'immortal song'! Nay, is it not actual experience, and of a lovely sort, that instantly the mind recurs to the recognition of this Religion of Universal Nature, it seems instinctively to feel the living return of all the ' liebliches Geschlecht ' of the ' Goiter Griechenlands ! ' Schiller was false to those inner breath- ings of true and present Deity which were the soul of his poetry, when he could lament for the ' entgotterte Natur ! ' The old cry of the elder deities, the dispossessed genii of mountain, stream, and wood, that sent forth their plaintive wail when the triumphant personality of the lord of creation asserted itself in its first engrossing egoism: the cry which the followers of the newly-incarnate Christ exulted in as the woe of departing demons, when it mourned ' Ai, the great Pan is dead ! ' comes back to our ears with a sense of beauty altogether new, now that we are no longer obliged to pervert its music by transposing it into the mythic representation of fact for which Christian Realism has taken it. Knowing, now, that the great Pan is not dead, and can never die ; and seeing that what that Christian Realism took for fact was fancy, and that what it took for fancy was fact; we listen to the far- subdued plaint aa pouring itself from the genuine pang of ancient severed faith, torn from that which was truly substance of its substance : a reverberating moan that has never hushed, sighing along the ages, a night-wind through primaeval pines, until its exquisite discord in a minor key is now once more resolving itself into the full harmony of an universal religion ! " And attuned to the spirit of religion such as this, has it not been always that a Wordsworth, an Emerson, and every true poet-nature has loved to stroll back into the world's early pastime, and see, forgetting all its store of grown-up acquisitions, ' what wisdom to the berries went ' ; silencing with ' pleasant fancies ' the over-inquisitive self- ism that asks ' What influence me preferred Elect to dreams thus beautiful ? ' Ungratefully-contemned Nature ! what happy return of innocent child- like truth, the lovely opposite of childish conceit, is it to feel how far superior is her own naturalness to that which we had esteemed super-natural, only because we were slow to believe how much greater Nature could be in herself than that which we had imagined ! In this sense, truly farthest from us be the notion of passing out of the range of the supernatural, and sitting down contented with the mere actual and present! Only, into our heaven, not alone the ' faithful dog', but this little daisy, budding into spring-life, must bear us company ! " " Thoughts in aid of Faith," by Sara S. Hennell, CHAPTER IV. SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM AND OTHER ABNORMAL CONDITIONS OF MIND. " The perfect observer in any department of science, will have his eyes as it were opened, that they may be struck at once by any occurrence, which, according to received theories ought not to happen, for these are the facts which serve as clues to new discoveries." Sir J. Herschel. " He who ventures to treat, a priori, a fact as absurd, wants pru- dence. He has not reflected on the numerous errors he would have committed in regard to many modern discoveries." Arago. " With regard to the miracle question, I can only say that the word ' impossible ' is not to my mind applicable to matters of philosophy. That ' the possibilities of nature are infinite ' is an aphorism with which I am wont to worry my friends. And if John Smith tells me to-morrow that by a word he can make a stone fall upwards, or cause the Record to speak with decency and fairness, or (say) the Bishop of Oxford, I may not think it worth while to go into the question, the value of Jdhn Smith's critical faculty being unknown to me, while the general course of experience is terribly against him, but I will not declare what he says to be a priori impossible. But if my friend Professor Tyndall should make either or both of the same assertions, I should feel bound at least to suspend my judgment until such time as the matter could be fully investigated." Professor Huxley. " In the last number of the Spectator (February 10, 1866), Professor Huxley has paid me the great compliment of stating that were I to tell him to-morrow that I could by a word cause a stone to fall upwards, he would feel bound to suspend his judgment until such time as the matter could be fully investigated. It is not often that I find myself unable to reciprocate the sentiments of my eminent friend. But on the present 70 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. occasion I feel bound to say, that were he to confide to me the statement of his ability to reverse by a word the action of gravity, my judgment regarding him would find mournful expression in the line : ' what a noble mind is here o'erthrown.' " * Professor Tyndall. The Correlation of Force in Living Structures. WHETHER the egg came before the chicken, or the chicken before the egg; whether organization depends upon life, or life upon organization, is still under dispute. What took place "In the beginning" it is difficult to say, but at the present time there seems to be a mutual dependence of organization upon life and life upon organization. Life the vital spark, is, as far as we know, in all cases hereditary for I hold the "spontaneous generation" theory to be at present " not proven." Life is transmitted from parent to offspring, and that offspring is dependent upon organization for the peculiar vital forces it displays; and with the organization perishes the life, at least in that form. As we have seen, however, the vital spark may lie dormant in * It will be seen that I look upon Huxley's as by far the more phi- losophical position. We see a stone " fall upwards " when projected by a word or volition, or nervous force, from the arm. Now is it certain that mental force, a correlate of physical, can act upon the stone through no other medium but the nerves and muscles of the arm? Huxley says, " let me see it, that's all" ; Tyndall says, " I won't look, the man's mad that asks me." Has gravitation then no correlate like the other forces ? We find whole seas ascending from their basins, and descending again with a force sufficient to turn all the machinery in the world. In the following pages I wish it to be distinctly understood that personally I cannot vouch for the truth of what are called the spiritual manifesta- tions; I have seen enough to induce me to believe they may be true, and the testimony of such men as Professor de Morgan, and many others equally honest, if not equally competent, I hold to be sufficient to warrant full investigation, and to " speculate " as I have done on their cause. FUNCTION DEPENDENT UPON STBUCTUKE. 71 the seed for thousands of years until quickened into growth by heat and moisture; whether the same thing can take place in animals as for instance in the toad said to be found alive in the red sandstone, is very problematical. Force, passing through the organization of the human body, accomplishes a great variety of work, according to the pecu- liarity of the structure through which it passes; and that which it does unconsciously through the stomach, liver, lungs, heart, circulation, muscles, &c., is quite as wonderful, and attended with quite as much intelligence as that which passes consciously through the brain. The perfection with which the different functions of the body are performed depends upon the condition of its organ. " The highest degree of organiza- tion giving the highest degree of thought." If the structure is impaired, disease takes place, and what is called the vis medicatrux natura, is probably nothing but the strong tendency that all vital structure has to assume its natural form or type. The usual inlets to the mind for the forces without, are said to be the five senses of Sight, Hearing, Smell, Taste, and Feeling; but the whole body is an inlet to the mind, and we have besides a sense of temperature, of pleasure and pain, and a muscular sense.* The bat, and somnambules * See " Man's Nature and Development," p. 97, et sec., by H. G. Atkinson, F.G. S., and Harriet Martineau. I consider this work the most valuable contribution towards Psychology based on Physiology which we have had since Gall and Spurzheim's works on Cerebral Physiology, or Phrenology. Professor Gregory, in the Preface to his work on Mesmerism says " The reader will find, in the work recently published by Mr. Atkinson and Miss Martineau, many striking facts connected with animal magnetism, which is one of the subjects treated of. Mr. Atkinson's observations on the functions of different parts of the brain as exhibited in the magnetic sleep are of the highest value, from that gentleman's great experience and intimate knowledge of the 72 SPECULATIONS ON SPIBITUALISM. and mesmerised people see without ey6s; that is, the same force of light is conveyed to the brain through a different medium. Heat and electricity pervade the whole nervous system, and light, heat, and electricity, are but differing con- ditions of the same force or influence, and this seeing with- out eyes therefore may be accounted for. Dr. Howe, in his education of Laura Bridgman, showed how possible it was to reach the mind through other than its ordinary inlets. The sense of pleasure and pain must be distinguished from the feeling that attends the propensities and sentiments and other mental faculties and sensations. Mr. Atkinson, very properly, I think, gives them their separate organs in the brain. In accordance with this we find that as each organ can manifest only a limited amount of force according to its peculiar func- tion, so only a certain amount of pain can at one time be endured. I know a lady who lately had eight teeth taken out at a sitting; after the first three she says she felt very little pain ; and martyrs at the stake and criminals on the rack fortunately could only feel a limited amount of pain. Pain and Pleasure are transformed force mental correlates; and Mr. Atkinson in mesmerising found that he could hold pain as it were, in the hollow of his hand; he could transfer it from another body to his own, and from one person to another, and " sleepers " who were so insensible that you might cut off their limbs without their knowledge, would feel instantly any pain inflicted on the mesmeriser. subject. I should have made use of them but his work did not appear until the whole of the first part of mine was written." I have received several communications from Mr. Atkinson relating to the subjects of this work, while it has been going through the press, which I think are valuable, and which I have given in the Appendix. THE OBSERVATION OF UNBOUNDED SPACE. 73 Hatter and Spirit the same in Essence^ As we have seen, external force, acting upon our peculiar organization, produces the phantom which we call the world : how, then, can spirit be more ethereal than this external force ? or how can ghosts be more ghosts than what we call gross material matter / Spirits, therefore, if they exist, cannot be more ethereal ; they may, however, be unseen, or we may be unconscious of their existence, because they may have no relation to our senses. Time and Space. That Time and Space are only " modes of thought," and can have no objective existence, or rather that the reality cannot accord with our conception, is evident from the fact that, according to our idea, the half of either Time or Space is as great as the whole ; thus we have the infinite divisibility of atoms, and a past, as long as a future eternity. * We know * Professor Tyndall tells us that, " Though we are compelled to think of space as unbounded, there is no mental necessity to compel us to think of it either as filled or as empty; whether it is filled or empty must he decided hy experiment and observation." (" Constitu- tion of the Universe." P\j-tnightly Review.) Now this may be very true, still we must admit that the ground would take some time to get over : he, in fact must be a fast traveller who could go over infinite space in less than infinite time ; particularly, if as the Professor tells us, the luminous ether the interstellar medium, although infinitely more attenuated than any gas, has definite mechanical properties those of a solid rather than a gas, " resembling jelly rather than air." We are told that we are by no means to consider this as a vague or fanciful conception on the part of scientific men, for that of its reality most of them are as convinced as they are of the existence of the sun and planets. Now although this "jelly" may be necessary to the exigen- cies of the vibratory theory with respect to light and beat, it must be evident that it renders the "observation" as to whether unbounded 74 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. only of thought, and of the force its correlate or equivalent ; and can a thought be a mile long or a yard square ? What, space is filled or not, still more difficult. I do not think that the term infinite or boundless can be used in any other sense than as exceeding the bounds of our knowledge ; whenever it is attempted to be used otherwise our first philosophers immediately fall into contradictions and absurdities. Righteousness, Holiness, Purity, Goodness, have only a relative existence, that is, can exist only in relation to finite things, how then can they be infinite ? In fact Infinite Goodness and Infinite Wisdom are contradictions, for goodness must be good to something, and knowledge must be of something, that is of some limited thing. Suppose there to have been a time when these things did not exist, these attributes could not have existed either. According to J. S. Mill there is no incorrectness of speech in the phrase Infinite Power but in speaking of Knowledge, absolute is the proper word and not infinite. The highest degree of knowledge that can be spoken of with a meaning only amounts to knowing all that there is to be known : when that point is reached, knowledge has attained its utmost limit. So of goodness or justice : they cannot be more than perfect. To which the learned critic (Mansel I am told,) in the Contemporary Review replies, " Surely whatever Divine Power can do, Divine Knowledge can know as possible to be done. The one therefore must be as infinite as the other." Quite so, none of these attributes can be more than relative manifestations and therefore finite, for as the writer says, " Will Mr. Mill have the kindness to tell us what he means by goodness and knowledge ' out of all relation,' i. e., a goodness and knowledge related to no object on which they can be exercised ; a goodness that is good to nothing, knowledge which knows nothing?" As attributes then must be finite, that is, can be exercised only in relation to finite objects, God is without attributes, that is, Pure Being. But that which has no attributes and nothing, to finite capacity is the same thing. The object then of the Hegelian Philosophy is to show how this nothing could become something ; nothing however meaning not non-existence, but existence independent of sense or pheno- mena. " Being underlies all modes or forms of being." God creates, that is, Being becomes, and the fundamental principle of Hegelism is said to be " That God awoke to consciousness, and acquired a will, in the consciousness and will of man." But " what can we reason, but from what we know" on this or on any other subject. And what do we know? Perhaps as much as EXTENSION NOT AN ATTRIBUTE OF THOUGHT. 75 then, is distance ? and can it apply to thought and feeling, that is, to what we call spirit ? and need there be space, therefore, necessarily separating mind from mind ? The Correlation of the Vital and Mental Forces. We are told, on what I believe to be good authority, that : " Generally speaking, the average amount of daily this: the world was without form and void, that is nebulous, and as the force or heat concentrated, it gradually took first the inorganic and then the special living forms that now lie deep buried in the earth's crust, and with each stratum or layer, was a fresh correlation of mind or sentiency an evolution, which covering the whole earth with a net- work of nerves, and passing again and again through different forms was refined and spiritualized till after countless ages it culminated in man, and " God became conscious in Humanity." But with respect to man, the highest intelligence here: " Think you this mould of hopes and fears Could find no statelier than his peers In yonder hundred million spheres ? This truth within thy mind rehearse, That in a boundless universe Is boundless better, boundless worse."' Tehnyson. " Go to ! You know nor this nor that ; Man has no measuring rod For Nature, Force, and Law, and what The best of men call God. For law, and life, and all the course Of lovely, shifting Nature, Are but the play of one wise Force, Which Moses called Creator. Think on your knees : 'tis better so, Than without wings to soar ; What sharp-eyed Logic thinks to know We find when we adore. " J. S. B. College, Edinburgh." 76 SPECULATIONS ON SPIBITUALISM. food necessary for healthy men is estimated at twelve ounces of beef, twenty ounces of bread, with about half-an-ounce of butter. These articles contain a force capable, if applied by a machine, of raising fourteen million pounds weight to a height of one foot; that is, the oxidation of the elements contained in them would give rise to an amount of heat equivalent to that effect. But in the human body, though it far surpasses all machines, in economy of force, the utmost amount of power attainable from them is not more than equivalent to three-and-a-half millions of pounds raised to the height of a foot ; and an average day's labour does not exceed two millions of pounds thus raised. The difference is mainly due, doubtless, to the number of internal actions which are carried on in the living body; such as the circu- lation, the movements of respiration, and the production of animal heat. These consume a great part of the force of the food, and leave only a remainder to be disposed of in muscular exertion." * Of course there must be great difference of opinion, not only as to the amount of force generated by the food, but also as to the mode of its expenditure. Thus we have Dr. Carpenter, supported by Helmholtz and Joule, differing from Professor Playfair, and the Professor differing from the above writer in the Cornhill, and we are prepared to receive the latter statement, therefore, only as a very wide approximation. But the question is, since force is indestructible, how is this force immense in every estimate expended ? It will be found, I think, that thinking and feeling absorb a larger portion than the vital powers, and the vital than the merely muscular. In a notice of Dr. Playfair's book on " Food and Work," in the Reader of June 3, 1865, the writer says with * Cornhill Magazine, September, 1861. DISTRIBUTION OF FORCE IN THE BODY. 77 reference to the distribution of this force: "In the steam- engine there are only two forces to he considered, the me- chanical and the thermal. In man's body there are many different forces, but the study of them is rendered in one sense easy, and in another difficult, by the fact that, however varied they may be within the economy, they pass away into the external world in two phases only, the same phases in which they leave the steam-engine viz., heat and movement. We speak of mental or cerebral force, of plastic or organic force, we look in upon the forces that go whirling round in our bodies, threading a devious path amid countless changes, working through most intricate machinery ; but there are only two ways in which their effects can be measured by one standing without. They either produce muscular movements, or increase the temperature of the body. Intense mental effort cannot by itself be measured by the physiologist. The slight muscular movements through which it strives to express itself, are in no way to be thought of as gauging its intensity. Its only true measure is the amount of heat produced by that combustion of cerebral tissue, which is the condition of its development. So, also, the true measure of the force con- cerned in the fashioning of a hand, or of any other piece of wonderful organic work, is that heat which is the outcome of all the molecular processes busied therein. We may, if we like, divide the work of the body into various kinds. We may speak of the opus meehanicum, the muscular labour or useful work; of the opus mentale, or brain work; of the opus meehanicum internum, or inner muscular woi'k, such as the heart's beat, the breath's play, the intestinal roll, and the arterial grasp ; of the opus vitale, or chemical and fashioning work; of the opus calorijicum, or the labour of keeping the body warm. Yet all these issue from the body as two kinds of work only, the opus meehanicum, the amount of foot-pounds 78 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. a man can lift in a hard day's work, and the opus caloriftcum, the quantity of ice his body will cause to melt during the same time." I believe this will prove to be a very inadequate account of the way in which the force received into the body again passes from it. The body is a system of solidified gases, or concentrated forces, (for particulars, see them as bottled up separately at the Kensington Museum,) in constant flux influx and efflux with everything around. No mention is here made of the electricity which is constantly flowing from the body in quantities more or less, as the nervous or other temperaments predominate in its structure. Nothing is said of the Odyle, to Reichenbach's sensitives visibly streaming from the extremities, and other parts of the body; or of the nervous force, composed perhaps of both the above, and which constitutes the peculiar strength of the magnetiser. But the most elaborate apparatus in the body is that for the production of mental force. Here no doubt is the expen- diture of the greater part of the fourteen million pounds lifting force that enters through the food, and the great question is what becomes of it ? The writer above truly says, " Intense mental effort cannot by itself be measured by the physiologist," and yet in this direction lies the future course of a psychology based on physiology. And also Herbert Spencer ''Those modes of the unknowable which we call motion, heat, light, chemical affinity, &c., are alike transformable into each other, and into those modes of the unknowable which we distin- guish as sensation, emotion, thought : these, in their turns, being directly or indirectly re-transformable into the original shapes." Exactly, "re-transformable!" but when, where, and how ? What becomes of every thought, as it is turned out of its " form" or mould in the brain ? We know it is the exact equivalent of the physical force expended in producing it, and THE SPIRITUAL OB THOUGHT MEDIUM. 79 sometimes, to our cost, if we make a man angry, we get its exact equivalent in physical force again : but where it takes the form of muscular motion or of heat, is, I think, the exception, not the rule. Many facts now point to an atmos- phere, or reservoir of thought, the result of cerebration, into which the thought and feeling generated by the brain is con- tinuously passing. The brains and nervous systems of the whole sensitive existence are increasing and intensifying this mental atmosphere. The question is, does force exist more commonly as physical force or as mental ? Does thought passing from us become free thought, or does it join some odylic or other medium ? and does each separate thought retain its identity, that is, the form impressed upon it by our organization ; or does it change its form, lose its con- sciousness, and thus no longer be thought and feeling ? The Manifestationists, we are told by Professor Masson, hold the doctrine, "which, if developed, would assert nothing less than the phenomenal recoverability within the Cosmos of all sen- tiency that had ever belonged to it." * It is the general belief that force cannot exist by itself, but must belong to something else must be the force of something ; but I think I have previously shown that this belief is untenable. Bacon says : " The magnetic or attractive energy allows of interposed media without destruction, and, be the medium what it may, the energy is not impeded. But if that energy or action has nothing to do with the interposed body, it follows that there is, at an actual time and in an actual place, an energy or natural action subsisting without body ; since it subsists neither in the terminal nor in the intermediate bodies. Wherefore magnetic action may serve as an Instance of Divorce in relation to corporeal nature and natural action. * Recent British Philosophy, p. 297. 80 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. To this may be added, by way of corollary, tbe following important result : that a proof thus be had, even by the mere philosopher of sense, of the existence of separate and incor- poreal entities and substances. For if natural energy and action emanating from a body can exist, at a time and in a place, entirely without body, it is pretty clear that it may originally emanate from an incorporeal substance. For a corporeal nature seems just as much required for supporting and conveying as for exciting or generating natural action."* "We have no difficulty in conceiving of electricity as existing freely throughout space; but thought or mind, and electricity, are the same force in different forms or modes of manifestation. Electricity, although apparently in existence everywhere, only manifests itself to us through some kind of machine or body, so free thought can only manifest itself to us through some kind of organization. We know that physical force everywhere is in direct communication; that the remotest star is influencing our earth and our earth it; that every centre of force or body is acting upon every other body. It is not less so in the force which we call mind. Mind is in connection with all other mind. There are certain individuals and nomadic tribes, in whom the vital system so predominates and the vital powers are so strong that they may literally be cut in two lose legs and arms and life not be destroyed; and there are others in whom the nervous system so predominates that thought and feeling are generated so rapidly and in such quantities that there is no time for their re-correlation or re-trans- formation through the bodily organization, and they flow over into the general reservoir of mind. Nervous force may also be made to overflow into other bodily systems. To * Kovum Organon, Lib. xi., Aph. 37. THE MENTAL, NERVOUS, AND OTHER FORCES. 81 what extent, and in what way conscious thought and feeling, nervous force, electricity, and odyle, differ from each other or are necessary to each other, has not, I think, been cor- rectly determined. The interesting experiments of Duhois Eaymond demon- strate the difference between nervous force and electricity, but Matteucci shewed that nervous force is capable of being transformed into electricity, under the influence of a pecu- liar structure, as illustrated in electrical fishes. Raymond's instruments may correctly measure the rate of the current along the nerve, but such experiments only show forcibly how much requires to be done. It is a step only in the right direction. When our philosophers, like Tyndall, pay the same attention to vital and mental forces as they now do to physical, we may hope to advance rapidly. I know that it is the general belief, even of the spiritualists, that mind cannot exist apart from organization, but if force can exist apart from body, mind, which is only another form of force, may do so also. Thought and feeling are transformed force and cannot cease to exist, and the question is when it passes from us, in what form does it exist? Does it retain consciousness, that is, remain thought and feeling? In sleep what becomes of it? There I think it takes another forai and is added to the vital force, as I have said before; but under a slight pressure on the brain, or temporary stoppage of the action of the heart, what becomes of it then? It is impossible to say what mind may be out of the body, as nothing can be known to us but in its action upon us that is relatively mind therefore cannot be known to us but in connection with organization, that is, our own organization. Sentiency is known to us only in connection with the brain and nervous system, and consciousness is reflection upon this sentiency, and is known to us only in G 82 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. connection with the highest intelligence here, that is, Man. That some kind of feeble sentiency attends the vitality of plants I think is very probable. We cannot go further down, for although every atom acts intelligently, that is, towards a given purpose, the consciousness is of it, not in it. When I speak then of a "thought" atmosphere, a "mental" atmosphere, or a "general" mind, I mean either mind or sentiency, or that condition of force which immediately precedes mind or consciousness, and which must exist in the brain, when from a slight pressure upon it, consciousness ceases. To the transference of nervous force, and even mental states with it, from one body to another, and to the union of individual mind with the mental atmosphere, are owing I think it will be found, all the varied phenomena of som- nambulism, mesmerism, and clairvoyance, and of what is called spiritualism. The Senses are considered to be the only inlets of the world without to the mind within, but they are also the regulators by which no more of the influx of the general mind is admitted than is good for our conduct and happiness in common life, in the sphere of duties in which we are placed. A Somnambule is enabled to do without the senses, and in a state of trance or mesmerism the barrier between individual and general mind seems partially broken down. Tlie Conditions attending Influx or Inspiration. The bodily conditions requisite to induce this state seem to be that the "meddling senses" should be laid asleep, and that all other parts of the body should have as little to do as possible. Prayer and fasting and solitude are particularly efficacious to this end. In solitude the senses are quiet, and under long and continued fasting the vital system having ABSORPTION IN UNIVERSAL BEING. 83 little to do, becomes partially absorbed in the nervous, and prayer induces a concentration of mental action on subjects that have no direct connection with the body. The bodily conditions we are considering predominate much more in some races than in others in the Eastern and sunny, than in the Western and more Northerly. Among the Hindoos they are most prevalent. The Hindoos are much better subjects for mesmerism than Europeans, and the arts of Divination and Magic, which are based on this partial breaking down of the barrier between general and individual mind, have always been much more in practice. To be absorbed in universal Being is the great aim of the religious fanatic in India, and many succeed in becoming partially so, even in the body. " The one infallible diagnostic of Buddhism is a belief in the infinite capacity of the human intellect. * * * The idea of Deified man is there; but this loses itself in another, that there is in man, in humanity, a certain Divine Intelligence, which at different times and in different places manifests itself more or less completely." * * * The natural eye takes account only of appearances; it requires the severest discipline for a man to behold the Eeality. * * * Wisdom is viewed as wholly social and experimental in one; internal and mystical in the second; strangely mixed with what is superhuman and eternal in the third." * The Buddhist Priest by the aid of irdhi is represented as being able to listen to all sounds, and know all thoughts, and see all former births, and watch' the course of all transmigrations, and learn the cause of all causes. The next stage the great desideratum, is, that having been subject to * The Religions of the World and their Relation to Christianity, pp. 76, 85, 93, by Rev. F. D. Maurice. 84 SPECULATIONS ON SPIEITUALISM. birth, decay, sorrow, weeping, grief, discontent, and vexation the consummation of the whole series of births and deaths is now attained, and that is, to pass again into " Nothing- ness." * This doctrine originated some 623 years before the Chiristian Era, and yet we might almost suppose that the doctrine of eternal torments had cast its shadow before. Important news travels faster in India by Mental Telegraph than by the Electric Telegraph. The results of important battles have been known days before the intelligence could arrive by the ordinary or official means. The source of these tidings cannot be traced; the natives say "it is in the air," and there has often been a generally uneasy feeling pervading mens' minds preceding ill news, when nothing definite has been known. The weakening of the vital force by disease, or partial paralysis, often intensifies the mind and sustains it in fuller action. Bacon tells us that " when the mind is withdrawn and collected within itself, and not diffused into the organs of the body, is the state which is most susceptible of divine influxions." In trance, and seeing in the crystal, and under hypnotism and mesmerism, " The mind is withdrawn and collected within itself, and not diffused into the organs of the body," and it is thus intensified, and the barriers between it and other minds, and between it and the general mind, are partially broken down. "The internal faculties appear to be loosened from the sense, and to receive impressions direct from without. "f * The Legends and Theories of the Buddhists, by B. Spencer Hardy. t " Each sense faculty is adapted to receive the peculiar influence or impression to which it relates : but the instrumentality or intervention of the external sense does not seem always requisite. The internal INSPIRATION. 85 Of course any influx of mind can only act in and through the human faculties, and cannot overstep the limits of their power or function, that is, it can give no kind of knowledge faculties seem to be loosened from the sense, and to receive impressions direct from without ; to be open to conditions to which the senses were not fitted. It does not seem to be any strain upon reason to suppose this. Few can give any account of the process by which they came at many of their conclusions. Clairvoyance or prophecy is no greater step from our ordinary condition than seeing would be to a blind person, who would say, ' I could only take up Nature bit by bit before, and put these bits together, and then form but a very imperfect conception : but now I recognize all at once ; the distant, as well as that which is near.' You set free the inner faculties, and open ' the eye of the mind ' to the outward influences of a grosser sense; and knowledge flows in unobstructed. You are as one who was blind, but can now see. The new sense and the old are equally intelligible, and both inexplicable. You cannot explain a process where there is none. The imperfect sense, the blind have a process to explain : but in clear-seeing there is no process but the fact." Han's Xature and Development, p. 276. Mr. Atkinson also says, " I think it is worthy of remark what Bacon has suggested, that we might receive other and fuller information from external objects had we other senses fitted to receive the impressions, and I think this may be demonstrated to be true, and hence if the inner sense can be brought in relation to the whole truth by shutting up the ordinary sense media and by mesmeric action, &c., enabling such inner powers to be brought in ^ direct contact with the entire fact, a deeper in- sight would be attained, as seems to be the case, and men acquire a more intuitive perception and clairvoyant character, under such irregular and abnormal conditions. And certainly things do become often, as it were, reversed under unusual conditions ; a dog attaining the instinct to seek the medicine it requires when sick ; the stem of a tree throwing out root, the root developing into flowers, and so on. The instances are innumerable and the laws of the normal action would be brought to light by such irregular actions and transformations under unusual conditions, just as the irregular or exceptional phenomena of the planets have given a knowledge of the laws of their motion the rule proved in the exception." 86 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. which it is not their province to bestow. What is the limit of that power when the organs are very large or very much excited has by no means been determined. What is the power that enabled Sir Isaac Newton and George Bidder to make their algebraic, geometric, and arithmetical calculations, giving at a glance results that it took long to work out on paper? What peculiar constitution of the organ of Locality is it that guides the carrier pigeon on its homeward progress, or the blind seal that found its long way home, or dogs that have come home from abroad, without, as far as we know, consulting any of the finger posts ? What is it in the more excitable brain of woman that enables her, on a first interview, often to read character correctly, and which in the larger organs of such men as Shakspeare and Scott has enabled them to read the natural language of the mind, and paint character so correctly without any principle or knowledge of mental Science ? Again, we have the action of the organ of Wonder or Faith. The senses call the Perceptive faculties into action, and Wonder gives a sense of reality a belief in the real objective existence of something corresponding to the ideas which they furnish. In the abnormal or greatly excited state of this organ, a reflex action takes place; Wonder itself calls the Perceptive faculties into play, and figures are produced which appear just as real as when the action on the Perceptives comes through the senses. Many ghosts may be accounted for in this way. The ^Esthetic faculties also when isolated from worldly cares and pas- sions or when naturally predominant, or unusually active or excited, seem to bring the mind into direct union with nature. Heat and electricity are constantly passing off from the body; so is mind. We influence every one and every thing about us, and are influenced by them. We photograph our THE EYE OP THE MIND. 87 mental states on all the rooms we inhabit. * We have probably some organ that takes cognizance of such " emanations," and which places us en rapport with the general mind. What Mr. Atkinson calls the " Eye of the Mind" may exercise some such function, f This faculty is supposed to bear the same relation to the internal action of the mind, as the mind itself does to external objects or forces. It sees at a glance, and generalizes the action of all the mental faculties, and is there- fore the highest of all our powers. As the Perceptive faculties, aided by the Senses, take cognizance of body or the action of physical forces, this takes cognizance of Spiritual or Mental forces. It is a sort of inner sense, through whose medium we may be put in communication with mind without oui-selves as well as the mind within. This organ, if existing at all, which I think highly probable, seems but very partially * A madman may be detected by the smell, and the diseased condition of his mind influences even healthy brains injuriously. With respect to bodily emanations we must remember that a bloodhound will follow a man over fifty or even one hundred miles of country what would these emanations have been if confined to a single room ! These emanations also have a distinctive character, for a dog seeking his master knows if he has been in a room although fifty other men may be there. + " Beneath the central organ of Comparison, lying under Benevo- lence, is what has been termed by a somnambule the ' Eye of the Mind '. This seems to be power of judgment: we might call it the Intuitive faculty ; for it is this whi^h is chiefly concerned in clairvoyance. * * * This faculty, this mental eye, seems to receive the results of the doings of the other faculties, and to be, properly speaking, perhaps the mind sense, joining as it does with the Conscious power. Here seems to be the organ of the suggestive faculty of Genius. This seems to be the true Mind power, or intellect. It seems to split off into the senses, as light divides off into colours, or sound into notes, but to contain within itself the power of mind concentrated, when cut off from the ordi- nary character of sense and reason. Then all time seems to become as one duration ; space seems as nothing ; all passions and desires become bushed; truth becomes an insight, or through-sight ; and life a law." Nature and Development, p. 76. (See also Appendix A.) 88 SPECULATIONS ON SPIEITUALISM. developed in the bulk of mankind, and its action is altogether misconstrued in those in whom it is fully developed. In our blindness and ignorance we have but one term for such powers ' ' imagination all imagination overstrained imagination," &c., as we call the action of our higher feelings, sentimental. The ordinary habits and intercourse of the world, where all are absorbed in mere externals ordinary sense and per- ception, and little carking cares and animal impulses, give but little chance for the growth and activity of such an inner sense, and it is not surprising that its promptings should be misunderstood and misinterpreted. Of course we can know only what our faculties tell us, and we can sympathize only with what we have feelings to sympathize with ; our strongest feelings induce us to protect and take care of our own bodies ; we have feelings also that make us a part of the body of Society; we have feelings that place us in relation to the beauties and harmony of Creation ; and we have this faculty that places us in relation to the general mind or spirit. Mr. Atkinson says, Clairvoyants call it the " Eye of the Mind," Spiritualists call it " The Spiritual Eye," it is the principal source of Influx or Inspiration, and probably places us in the same relation to the Universal Spirit as our other faculties do to our fellow creatures. By the general mind I mean the general mind of humanity, or perhaps I ought to say of the whole of sensitive existence, for I have not seen evidence of any knowledge that can be said to be superhuman, To say that force is everywhere connected, atom with atom, and world with world, is to say that mind, its correlate, is everywhere connected is one and indivisible; but what we can see in the great mirror of mind when in union with it, remains to be investigated: so far as that investigation has proceeded, I think what we can see in no case exceeds the CLAIRVOYANCE. 89 combined intellectual power of the whole human mind. Whatever has been, or is, in the human mind, or which our natural powers can reach, that we can see, and that only. What we can see cannot exceed the power of the instrument. The prescriptions by clairvoyants for the cure of disease in Mesmer's time were always in accordance with the fashionable modes of cure of that time ; and Andrew Jackson Davis, and other Seers, although often reaching the highest rounds in philosophy, never go past what has been already known, or what human faculty can teach or comprehend. They can read the mind of the age, but they rarely if ever anticipate scientific discovery. They give us, as in Davis's case, what the Edinburgh Review (October, 1865), calls " a mad jumble of Spinozaisrn, Fourierism, Saint Simonianism, Swedenbor- gianism, and Rationalism," and although here may be found the most important psychological truths and the most advanced social science, yet there is so much nonsense mixed with sense that observation and experience is as much required to sift the true from the false in these revelations, as in any that come through the ordinary means of knowing. By union of mind with the general thought medium, and of mind with mind, that is seen which cannot be seen by the natural eye, both near and distant, time and space forming no impediments. I have heard a young'-girl, in the mesmeric state, minutely describe all that was seen by a person with whom she was en rapport, and in some cases more than was seen or could be seen, such as the initials in a wateh which had not been opened, and also describe persons and scenes at a distance, which I afterwards discovered were correctly described, beyond a possibility of doubt. But Prevision! surely there are instances of prevision that are superhuman ? Science enables us to anticipate the future; there is an established order of nature everywhere, and it is a correct calculation of cause and 90 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. effect that enables us to prophesy. It is the organ of causality that takes cognizance of this invariable sequence, and we have only to suppose that organ from largo size or excitement, to be as abnormal in its action and power of calculation as the organ of number often is in arithmetical calculation, and we might see very far into the future. * Perhaps one of the most singular and best authenticated cases of preternatural mental power is that related by Zschokke of himself, in his Auto- biography, pp. 169, 172. He says, " It has happened to me, sometimes on my first meeting with strangers, as I listened silently to their discourse, that their former life, with many trifling circumstances therewith connected, or frequently some particular scene in that life, has passed quite involuntarily, and, as it were, dream-like, yet perfectly distinct before me. * * * For a long time I held such visions as delusions of the fancy, and the more so as they showed me even the dress and motions of the actors, rooms, furniture, and other accessories. * * * I myself had less confidence than any one in this mental jugglery. So often as I revealed my visionary gifts to any new person, I regularly expected to hear the answer: ' It was not so.' I felt a secret shudder when my auditors replied that it was true, or when their astonishment * " It is, however, admitted that this foresight does not extend to the influence of external circumstances by which the ordinary course of the phenomena may be interrupted. Thus, a patient may predict that on a certain day and at a certain hour he may have an epileptic fit, but in the mean time he may be accidentally killed or intentionally mur- dered. His predictions of the phenomena of his own disease are to be understood in the same sense as the prediction of the astronomer of the rise and fall of the tides in a particular port, that is, subject to the im- plied condition, that the natural course of things shall not be deranged by any external and irregular disturbing cause." Monthly Chronicle, vol. i., p. 298. It would thus seem, as I have said, that the pre- vision does not exceed the preternatural power of the organ of causality. (See also Appendix B.) MEMORY. 91 betrayed my accuracy before they spoke. * * * I shall not say another word of this singular gift of vision, of which I cannot say it was ever of the slightest service; it manifested itself rarely, quite independently of my will, and several times in reference to persons whom I cared little to look through. Neither am I the only person in possession of this power." He met, he tells us, with an old Tyrolese, who for some time after fixing ft is eyes upon him, read him as he had read others. What has been called Socrates's Demon was an intuition of a similar kind, although quite different in its function, as by it Socrates was repeatedly made acquainted with events about to happen. He is said to have regarded it in very much the same light as Zschokke did; he was, however, an implicit believer in supernatural communications. We have previously said that whatever has been, or is, in the human mind, clairvoyants can recognize; but what should turn the atten- tion and apparently confine the power to this one particular direction? Here in Zschockke's case, was a mental indi- viduality the whole of a man's previous existence, presented to him and retained in such perfect form that it could be recognized by a separate and indifferent person, and had its possessor not been still living, it might have been, and no doubt would havf been, claimed as the soul of the departed " communicating." What is Memory? The consideration of the nature of memory may perhaps help to throw some light upon this question. It is a difficult subject this of Memory, of which we must not speak too confidently, and cannot speak too modestly. Ah 1 the powers in nature could not make the acorn grow into anything else than an oak. Yet what can we see or recognize in the 92 SPECULATIONS ON SPIEITUALISM. small, soft, apparently homogeneous germ in the acorn that can give it this power of action and resistance ? Life, and the entire character and direction of that life, depend upon structure, so do the forms of thought, and any subject or object of attention and interest acting upon the brain, pho- tographs itself there, that is, it slightly alters its structure ; and fresh mental force passing over these " moulds," turns out similar thoughts and feelings to those that formed them. This it is, joined to certain powers of Association, or auto- matic action of the brain, by which thoughts and feelings are blended and made to follow each other in a definite order, which possibly constitutes memory. It is probably these old photographs which Zschokke's "Eye of the Mind," or other organ which gives "the intuition of character," as he himself seemed to suppose, could read. The youthful brain is the most easily impressible, and the memory becomes bad and retains few impressions as the brain ossifies and its plastic power decreases in age ; that part going first which came the earliest into activity the memory for names, &c. On the other hand there is a tendency in nature to rebuild the early structure to produce the original type on which a particular kind of memory depended, and the memory of youth returns. Mr. A. Bain makes memory to depend on " specific growth;" he says, "For every act of memory, every exer- cise of bodily aptitude, every habit, recollection, train of ideas, there is a specific grouping, or co-ordination, of sensa- tions and movements, by virtue of specific growths in the cell junctions, and of separate nervous growths for each new and separate acquisition." * * The Intellect viewed Physiologically. Fortnightly Review, February 1, 1866. THE FACTS OF SPIRITUALISM. 93 SPIRITUALISM.- Genuineness of the Phenomena, But is the above hypothesis, and the normal and abnor- mal condition of mind described, sufficient to account for the phenomena of Spiritualism? Of such phenomena as are genuine I think they are. But are any of the alleged facts genuine ; are not fraud and superstition and self- delusion suf- ficient to account for them all ? Although a great deal may be accounted for in this way still a large residue remains of most important psychological phenomena. The spiritualists have a theory to support, for the good, as they suppose, of all mankind; we must not be surprised therefore if the facts require a little forcing to fit that theory, and if the theorists often think they see what they so strongly wish to see. For most of the alleged facts we may readily find the testimony of twelve honest witnesses, and we must not reject that testi- mony, because in ignorance of mental science, and the bodily conditions upon which it depends, such facts are used to support superstitions which are vanishing before the advancing light of the age. The strength of intolerance and bigotry is generally in proportion to ignorance, but I do not think any candid person, after examination, can resist the testimony in favour of the facts themselves. The article in the Corn/rill Magazine, " Stranger than Fiction," is rightly attributed I believe to Robert Bell, and Dr. Gully, of Malvern, says of it, "I can state with the greatest positiveness that the record made in that article is, in every particular correct," and " that no sleight-of-hand, or other artistic contrivance produced what we heard or beheld." So it may be presumed that Dr. Gully was present on this occasion, and as Mr. Home is stated in 94 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. that account in the Cornhill to have floated about the room, over the heads of the persons present, witches riding about on broom-sticks maybe "founded in fact" after all. The above statement of Dr. Gully's is to be found in " Incidents of my Life," by D. D. Home; of which book a " Friend" in the " Introductory Remarks," says, " whatever be the pre- conceptions of the reader regarding Mr. Home, he will scarcely fail after reading this volume, to acknowledge that the author writes as a man thoroughly in earnest, and who has himself no doubt of the phenomena that attend him." In this I most heartily concur; still Mr. Home may not be altogether free from the unconscious effort to make facts square to his theory, or, when "the spirits", on some important occasion, were not sufficiently demonstrative, from giving to them some little assistance. Mr. T. Adolphus Trollope, writing from Florence to the Aihenaum, March 21, 18G3, says, " I have been present at very many ' sittings ' of Mr. Home in England, many in my own house in Florence, some in the house of a friend in Florence. * * * I have seen and felt physical facts wholly and utterly inexplicable, as I believe, by any known and generally received physical laws. I unhesitatingly reject the theory which considers such facts to be produced by means familiar to the best professors of legerdemain. I have witnessed also very surprising and extraordinary metaphysical manifestations. But I cannot say that any of these have been such as wholly to exclude the possibility of their being deceptive, and indeed, to use the honest word required by the circumstances, fraudulent. " This is my testimony reduced to its briefest possible expression. "If it be asked what impression, on the whole, has been left on my mind by all that I have witnessed in this matter, I PROFESSOR DE MORGAN'S TESTIMONY. 95 answer, one of perplexed doubt, shaping itself into only one conviction that deserves the name of an opinion, namely, that quite sufficient cause has been shown to demand further patient and careful inquiry from those who have the opportunity and the qualifications needed for prosecuting it ; that the facts alleged and the number and character of the persons testifying to them are such that real seekers for truth cannot satisfy themselves by merely pooh-poohing them." But the testimony most to be relied on for the reality of the phenomena is that of perhaps one of the most acute and hard-headed philosophers of this day, not a spiritualist but a Professor of Mathematics, Augustus de Morgan. In the admirable Preface to Mrs. de Morgan's book, " From Matter to Spirit", he says " I am perfectly convinced that I have both seen and heard, in a manner which would make unbelief impossible, things called spiritual which cannot be taken by a rational being to be capable of explanation by imposture, coincidence or mistake." He says " there has been a sudden and general recognition of the existence of phenomena which historical enquiry shows never to have been entirely unknown." The base of the spiritualist hypothesis he tells us is " tiat some intelligence, which is not that of any human beings clothed in flesh and blood, has a direct share in the phenomena." And again, " My state of mind which refers the whole either to unseen intelligence, or something which man has never had any conception of, proves me to be out of the pale of the Royal Society," (p. 27,) but, he says, " if these things be spirits, they show that pretenders, cox- combs, and liars are to found on the other side of the grave as well as on this." (p. 44.) " When it comes to what is the cause of these phenomena, I find I cannot adopt any explanation which has yet been suggested. If I were bound to choose among things that I can conceive, I should say that 96 SPECULATIONS ON SPIEITUALISM. there is some sort of action of some combination of will, intellect, and physical power, which is not that of any of the human beings present. But thinking it very likely that the universe may contain a few agencies say half-a-mil- lion about which no man knows anything, I cannot but suspect that a small proportion of these agencies say five thousand may be severally competent to the production of all the phenomena, or may be quite up to the task among them. The physical explanations which I have seen are easy, but miserably insufficient ; the spiritual hypothesis is suffi- cient, but ponderously difficult." Of the possible existence of such occult forces Mr. W. E. Grove, writing however not on Spiritualism, but on Light, says, " The conviction that everv transient gleam (of light) leaves its permanent impress on the world's history, also leaves the mind to ponder over the many possible agencies of which we of the present day may be as ignorant as the ancients were of the chemical character of light."* Dr. Ashburner tells us (quoted in "An Exposition of Spiritualism," p. 290), that "A force which is a material agent, attended by or constituting a coloured light, emanates from the brain of man, when he thinks that his will can direct its impingement and that it is a motive power." f Mr. Atkinson also, in the same work, (p. 295,) says, " The so called spiritual manifestations arise from a force projected and directed by the unconscious sphere of the mind or soul": and before the occurrence of such manifestations he * Correlation of Physical Force, p. 152. t The Catholics tell us that the heads and countenances of Saints in their Church have shone out with a glorious brightness, as the face of an angel. No douht the " auriole " was the odylic light of Reichenbach, or this coloured light of Dr. Ashburner, much more evident, even to "sensitives", in some persons than in others. MEXTAL AND PHYSICAL FORCES. 97 remarked, (Letters, p. 114,) " amongst matter to be inquired into are all cases of persons who cast off an influence which causes motion in surrounding objects," &c.# Mr. D. D. Home's explanation is, " That the spirits accomplish what they do through our life-sphere, or atmo- sphere, which was permeated by our wills ; and if the will was contrary the sphere was unfit for being acted upon," f consequently scepticism marred the forces at work. He tells us "One of his friends was converted from previous unbelief, by seeing a female hand, which was visible to all in the room, slowly forming in the air a few inches above the table, until it assumed all the apparent materiality of a real hand, (p. 132) ; but he tells us, spirits have great difficulty in presenting, and thus inccirnating these hands out of the vital atmosphere of those present, and that their work was spoilt, and had to be recommenced, when they were interfered with." (p. 77.) We are also told in "Incidents in my Life," that Dr. Carpenter " thinks these phenomena are produced by ' uncon- scious cerebration,' " and Mr. J. D. Morell refers them to "reflex action of the mind"; we may presume, therefore, that both these gentlemen accept the genuineness of the phenomena, and their explanation, taken jointly, with Dr. Ashburner's, does not much differ, probably, from my own, although they * " Every fragment or material we can hold or see is a storehouse of force. In the case of certain compounds like gunpowder, we know how to unlock chemical forces of affinity and cohesion, and to ohtain by a sudden expansion and re-arrangement of atoms, a mechanical power that rends the rock or propels the ball ; but it is startling to think that the most quietly-behaved bodies we find on the globe, the granite frames of mountains, or the very dust particles on the road, are like sleeping lions, full of potential force, which they can give out the mo- ment the balance of their affinities are disturbed." " Physical Forces.'' The Intellectual Observer, April, 1866. t Incidents of my Life, p. 75. H 98 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. might repudiate it. What I have called a mental or thought atmosphere is the result of cerebration, and as far as we know it is devoid of consciousness, until it becomes so as " reflected" in our own organizations. Conscious cerebration, or mind, as we have seen, is transformed force, received into the body in the food, and is, like all force, persistent or indestructible, and when it passes from us, it probably becomes unconscious cerebration, and joins other force of the same nature, and through its medium all bfains are brought into union, so that what one brain is conscious of another may be, and what is in the mind of sentiency becomes common pro- perty. This "unconscious cerebration," the produce of the whole of sentient existence, may again become sentiency in animals and consciousness in man, and thus we have so much as is true in the doctrine of transmigration of souls. The light of the soul beams brightly for a time in our consciousness, but the rays although scattered never cease to exist, but form a gradually intensifying atmosphere of their own. As the individual constituents of our bodies take new forms, so no one particle of mind is lost. Application of the TJieory : Physical Force, Table Moving, Bopping, Levilation, dc. Now let us see how the facts of Spiritualism accord with our Theory. Mrs. de Morgan's record of these facts in "From Matter to Spirit," is on the whole fair, and even philosophical, when not encumbered by old superstitions and an anthropological theology. We have to account for physical force and intelligence supposed to be not that of any human beings present. With respect to physical force, gravitation and nervous force or "unconscious cerebration," are con-elates, that is, trans- GRAVITATION AND NERVOUS FORCE. 99 fortnable, like heat and electricity, into each other, and, like heat and electricity, although quantitatively the same, they are qualitatively different, that is, they differ in their mode of action, and when a table becomes charged with the nervous force it seems to dispossess or change the character of gravitation, and it acts less as a downward attraction. The rising and moving of tables and other articles of furniture exactly accords in the mode of action with this loss of gravitation or weight. When intelligence appears, and this nervous force or "cerebration" acts more or less consciously under the power of the Will, we are told in the history of "Mary Jane"*, that the physical force ceases; as in the animal body it is changed in its form of manifestation. I say, .more or less consciously, because the rapping is sometimes the effect of conscious but more often of uncon- scious cerebration. As an illustration of the conscious, Mrs. de Morgan says, " As each rap seemed to be shot through my arm, it was accompanied by a feeling like a slight blow or shock of electricity, and an aching pain," &c. " This experiment," she says, " seemed to prove that the nerves of the human body were necessary, if not for the production, at least for the propagation of the sounds." f Her maid Jane described the effect produced, as "first a throbbing, then a creaking, then a full-formed sound like a concussion of air, which she said passed through her arms like an electric shock" (p. 21.) I have not seen much of these phenomena, but what I once saw by a celebrated medium was of this character: he took my umbrella and held it at arm's length against the looking glass and the door and other things, and got three distinct throbbing pulsations, but he could not do Mary Jane ; or Spiritualism Chemically Explained. From Matter to Spirit, p. 17. 100 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. the same with his own small stick till a gentleman took hold of his other hand. That the raps were always three, neither more nor less, showed, I inferred, that they were to some extent under the control of the will. That these raps are subjective, and not made by spirits, I think is evidenced by their attending only upon some people, and those of peculiar constitution, and that these people, as in Mr. Home's case, sometimes lose the power, and that for months together. The author of " Spiritualism Chemically Explained," says, "But now a further progressive phase took place; it was not necessary to sit at the table ; if my wife lay on the sofa, the responsive taps would come apparently from behind the sofa ; and even in bed, the conversation was carried on by Mary Jane, (the name he gave to the supposed cause of or instru- ment in these manifestations, -as he did not believe in ' the spirits,') either by raps over our heads, or apparently on a chest of drawers close by the bed. One night, after we were in bed, I was talking with Mary Jane, and I perceived that my wife was getting sleepy, and it entered my mind to test whether the emanations continued during sleep, so I continued the conversation. By degrees, the responses became slower and fainter, and by the time I was convinced that my wife was fast asleep, they ceased altogether." (p. 310.) Generally Mary Jane would rap anywhere she was asked to do. (p. 319.) During his wife's illness, from whom he supposed Mary Jane to be an Odylic emanation, the manifestations were very feeble. (p. 823.) When we consider the power generated by the food in the body, a power equal to raising fourteen millions of pounds one foot, the consumption of not half of which is at present accounted for; and considering the great number of purposes to which this power is applied, and the different forms it takes in the human body, we ought not to feel surprised THE FORCE OF WILL. 101 that individuals should possess this power of rapping. When we throw a stone the motion is owing to force derived from our bodies, which force is again given out as heat when the motion ceases, the arm is merely the leverage by which the force is used. Why may not force be used, projected as this is by the Will, without such leverage? We are accustomed to a visible and tangible medium, and we confound this mere medium with the force itself. Professor Tyndall, in a corre- spondence on Science and Prayer, in the Pall Mall Gazette, (October, 1865,) says, " The external motion of your arm is derived immediately from a motion within your arm, it is in fact this motion in another shape. While you were pushing your inkstand a certain amount of oxidation occurred in the muscles of your arm, which oxidation, under normal circumstances, produces a certain definite amount of heat. To move the inkstand, a certain quantity of that heat has been consumed which is the exact amount of the work done. You could do the same work with the same amount of heat from an ordinary fire. The force employed is the force of your food which is stored up in your muscles. The motor nerves pull the trigger and discharge the force. You have here a series of transformations of purely physical energy, with one critical point involved in the question, " what causes the motor nerves to pull the trigger? Is the cause physical or super-physical? Is it a sound or a gleam, or an external prick or purpose, or some internal uneasiness that stimulates the nerves to unlock the muscular force or is it free will?" There can, I think, be no doubt as to the source of the force causing the rapping the body lets off a series of percus- sion caps, it does not discharge the whole machine, and the question is through what medium out of the body this is effected, and what pulls the trigger? for it is evident that the rapping is not always voluntary, or under the control of 102 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. the will. Mr. Home declares that the manifestations that attend upon him are quite without his own control. They are sometimes voluntary, however, as Mary Jane would rap when- ever she was asked, and the power of the will, inside the body as well as outside, has yet to be ascertained. The Spectator, in the article we have already quoted, " Science and Miracle," says " almost every physiologist will admit the power which pure Will has over the nervous system, that it can prolong consciousness and even life itself for certain short spaces, by the mere exertion of vehement pur- pose. Physicians tell you constantly that such and such a patient may no doubt, if it be sufficiently important, by a great effort command his mind sufficiently to settle his affairs, but that it will be at the expense of his animal force, in short, that it will be a free transfer of force from the diges- tive and so to say vegetating part of his system, to that part of his physical constitution, his nervous system, which lies closest, as it were, to the will, (and which in fact is changed in form and becomes will). Nay, we have heard physicians say that patients, by a great effort of pure will, have, as they believe prolonged then- own lives for a small space, that is, have imparted we suppose, through the excitement produced by the will on the nervous system and so downwards, a certain slight increase of capacity to assimilate food to the failing organic powers of the body. In other words, we conclude, just as the organism is failing to draw supplies of physical force from the outward world, its power of doing so may be slightly prolonged, the outward world drained of a small amount of force it would otherwise have kept in stock, and the organism compelled to absorb it by a pure volition. Can there be a clearer case of action of the super- natural on the natural, even granting that the sum total of physical force is not altered, but only its application AN EMANATION FROM ALL BRAINS. - 103 changed?" No doubt the will has all the power that physi- cians thus ascribe to it and more, but there is nothing in such power supernatural, as the Spectator supposes. " A pure volition " is the correlate or equivalent of so much phy- sical force, and this change of vital or vegetative force to mental, and of mental back to vital, is seen to be one of the commonest facts in nature when once observed. There is always a sufficient mental force in reserve, if the will be strong enough to bring it into action, to act upon the vital, that is, the digestive and assimilative powers, and thus to gain new force for a time from the world without. Intelligence. Besides the "levitation" and rappings, the Spiritualist hypothesis assumes " the co-operation of an Intelligence which is not that of any human being," and Professor de Morgan's state of mind he says "refers the whole either to unseen intelligence or to something which man has never had any conception of." My own opinion is that there is an emanation from all brains, the result of both conscious and unconscious cerebration, forming, not spirits, but a mental or spiritual atmosphere, by means of which peculiar constitutions mediums and others, are put en rapport with other brains or minds, so as to become conscious of whatever is going on there. I believe the intelligence which manifests itself in a " circle," which is not that of any person present, or as Mrs. de Morgan expresses it, "the elementary idea or truth sought to be conveyed, and which does not originate with the medium," is the simple result, upon an enlarged and more general state, of that "thought reading" which we see every day in clairvoyants. This spiritual atmosphere is also able to bring the mind into immediate contact, without the aid of the 104 SPECULATIONS ON SPIRITUALISM. senses, with whatever it pervades, so that people can see both near and distant what they could not see with ordinary eyesight. This is only another well known phase of Clair- voyance. Indeed Mrs. de Morgan tells us " that every wonderful effect produced by mesmerism has since found its explanation or its counterpart in spiritual phenomena." (p. 49.) Again she says " It is indisputable that the medium is under mesmeric influence, but what is that influence ? and in these cases whence does it proceed?" To what extent, and under what conditions, through this atmosphere of cerebration, mind can act on mind, can only be matter of observation and experiment. First we have to consider the conditions under which we can be put into contact or communication with this " atmo- sphere." The bodily constitutions requisite seem greatly to vary both in power and the mode of manifestation, and among what are called "mediums" there seems to be a power of both efflux and afflux, as we have the mesmeriser and the mesmerised the giver and receiver. Some mediums have the power of intensifying the spiritual atmosphere, others of receiving whatever this atmosphere may contain. " Great exercise of mediumship," Mrs. de Morgan tells us, "is likely to exhaust the more delicate constitution of the nervous sanguine, (p. 4,) while great activity in the brains of those concerned interferes with the experiment," (p. 6,) the one state referring to the first class of mediums, the other to the latter. " The unseen power," we are told, "prefers a passive state to a positive action of the brain," (p. 39,) and our own force requires to be exhausted by physical effort, by illness, by watching, fasting, or prayer, before we can become the recipient of the new, and that thus the condi- tion necessary for impression is one in the medium and the inspired prophet. "In such a case I have seen," says the WHENCE THE INTELLIGENCE IS DERIVED. 105 author of " From Matter to Spirit," " every limb thrown into strong convulsive action, as if the