REESE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Deceived FEB- . -10- 1-894 > l8 9 - I *A Accessions No&ttTTY.... Class No. >/ INTRODUCTION AND NOTES TO THK- BOOK oiozmiRcrs TUSCULAN DISPUTATIONS -BY- FRANK SMALLEY, A. M.; PH. D. PROFESSOR OF THE LATIN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE IN THE SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY. SYRACUSE, N. Y. T. W. DTJBSTON, 1892. CONTENTS. PAGE. Preface 3 Introduction 5 I. The Tusculan Disputations .r 5 II. Argument of Book V 7 III. A Brief View of Greek and Roman Ethical Philosophy 11 (a) Socrates 11 (b) The Cynics, (Antisthenes and Diogenes) 12 (c) The Cyrenaics, (Aristippus and Theodorus) 13 (d) Plato 15 (e) The Academies 18 (1) The Old Academy, (Speusippus, Xenocrates, Polemo, etc.) 18 (2) The Middle Academy, (Arcesilaus and Carneades) 18 (3) The New Academy, (Philo and Antiochus) 19 (f) Aristotle 20 (g) The Peripatetics, (Theophrastus, Aristo, Callipho, etc.) 21 (h) The Stoics, (Zeno, Aristo of Chios, Diogenes of Babylon, Panaetius, etc.) 22 (i) The Epicureans, (Epicurus, Metrodorus, etc.) 28 (j) Relations of Epicureanism to Stoicism 33 (k) The Eclectics, (Cicero) 34 Notes on the text. . 36 PREFATORY NOTE. The Introduction and annotations here presented are advance sheets. They are printed now because needed for immediate use. The plan is to extend the latter to other portions of the text, and briefly to extend and adapt the former to the same. Some Latin text of the Disputations, as Teubner's or Harper's, will be used in the class. No scholar can feel any degree of confidence or any assurance of competence to present a commentary on this composition of Cicero without first devoting much thoughtful study to the great German editors, whose works have done so much to furnish a correct text and a clear exposition of the sometimes obscure passages, elucidat- ing the author's thought. Reference is made especially to the works of Wolf, Moser and Kiihner. Use has been constantly made of the edition of Heine, and especially of Tischer's (Sorof) last (eighth), on whose text the notes are based. Independent additions have been made where it was deemed that the interest of a clear exposition demanded; especially is this true of comments of a biographical and philosophical character. A few grammatical references have been inserted. The design in reading this Latin should not be so much the study of the language as of the thought ; and the student should have little need of gram- matical instruction, but be able to give his attention almost exclu- sively to the style, the elevated tone, the general line of thought and the philosophical questions discussed. As a necessary preparation for understanding the philosophy, the introduction has been pre- pared ; for, the reader who has not previously devoted some atten- tion to ancient philosophy, would, when introduced thus, "/ medias res" be quite incapable of comprehending the author. He must first fix in mind the ethical teachings of this philosophy, the discus- sion of which constitutes the substance of the work, and with which the author assumes that his reader has a reasonable familiarity. Such preparation, moreover, is especially important in this case; first, be- cause this book is the last of a series, the writer naturally assuming that the books have been perused in order; second, because the work, as a whole, followed in time of composition other philosophical writings of the author to which it stands related, as the practical to the theoretical. In the five books De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum he had treated of the foundation of ethics, the doctrine of the high- est good and of evil ; the Tusculanae Dispulationes followed, in which he showed what things are necessary to the greatest happiness in life. If we were to specify narrowly the knowledge most indispensable to the student at the outset, it would be this: the ethical views of Aristotle, of the Old Academy, of the Stoics and of the Epicureans, of Carneades of the Middle Academy, of Antiochus of the New Academy, and of Cicero himself. See INTRODUCTION; (and for Cicero), III. THE ECLECTICS. The helps made use of in preparing the commentary are suffi- ciently indicated above. In the philosophical introduction the more important works consulted are as follows : History of Philo- sophy, Dr. F. Ueberweg, translated by Morris, vol. i ; A Sketch of Ancient Philosophy, J. B. Mayor; A Brief History of Greek Philo- sophy, Burt ; Christianity and Greek Philosophy, Cocker ; A Short History of Greek Philosophy, Marshall; Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Diogenes Laertius, translated by Yonge; Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics, Zeller, translated by Reichel. FRANK SMALLEY. SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, September, 1892. (UNIVERSITY INTRODUCTION. I. THE TUSCULAN DISPUTATIONS. Cicero tells us in the first book that the five books of the Tusculan Disputations are the record of the five days discussion of philo- sophic questions at his Tusculan villa (whence the name), each book representing the discussion of a day. The questions considered have a practical application to life, and the treatise is a contribution to moral philosophy. It was begun in the year 45 B. C. and finished the following year. The form of each book is that of a dialogue not as in his other works, between equals but one of his pupils or friends suggests a thesis and briefly attempts to maintain it, after which Cicero, having refuted his views, proceeds almost without interruption to discuss the topic at length. The popular method of presentation, the easy flow of thought, and above all the elevated and noble moral tone combine to delight the reader. However it must be admitted that there is a weakness in his arguments and a lack of keenness in his logic compared with the dialectic of Plato which is his model. " The Tusculan Disputations is a work of des- pair. When Cicero wrote them, Italy was given over to Caesar and the host of tribunes and centurions who had conquered license in his train. Everything but good conscience seemed lost beyond recovery; and Cicero strove to convince himself, in convincing the young yet uncorrupted by the world, that to keep a good conscience through everything is enough, and more than enough; that to know this is our main concern; and that glory and success and all exter- nals are so secondary that the inquiry as to whether they add any- thing more or less to virtue only serves curiosity, if, indeed, it does not lower courage. Even the style is affected by the reckless earn- estness of the writer, and becomes more animated and pathetic, and at the same time less pure." The above quotation from Simcox states the circumstances under which the work was composed and partially sets forth the object the author had in view. More specif- ically, it may be stated that the great object was to assure himself and his readers that amidst all the evils of life (I use the expression in its popular sense) there is one secure refuge namely, virtue, and that virtue insures happiness under all circumstances. Man has thus in his own power all that is necessary for happiness. The first book speaks of the proper attitude toward death, holding that it is not an evil, and is to be looked upon with indifference if not actually regarded as a blessing ; the second book teaches us that bodily pain, although an evil, can be overcome by the exercise of reason and self-control ; the third book refutes the proposition that the wise man is subject to grief or sorrow. Cicero says: " Your question was concerning a wise man, with whom nothing can have the appearance of evil, that is not dishonorable ; or at least anything else would seem so small an evil, that by his wisdom he would so overmatch it, as to make it wholly disappear." The fourth book has reference to other emotions or passions of the mind, the thesis being thus stated: "Non omni animi perturbations sapiens potest vacare" This is refuted on the Stoic principle that no man can be called virtuous who has not gotten rid of all emotions or passions, or the beliefs which give rise to these irrational impulses. " But certainly the most effectual cure is to be achieved by showing that all per- turbations are of themselves vicious, and have nothing natural or necessary in them." The fifth book maintains that virtue in itself is sufficient to insure a happy life, which is related to the thesis of the preceding books as the universal to the particular, the contain- ing to the contained. It is a comprehensive statement of a general proposition involving all the questions that were proposed, discussed and settled in harmony with it in the preceding books. This book is justly regarded as the most pleasing and attractive of the five. II. ARGUMENT OF BOOK V. The first four chapters are introductory. Reference is made to the opinion of Brutus that virtue is sufficient of itself to insure a happy life a truth of the highest importance, but one which the infirmity of human nature leads him sometimes to distrust, until, by reflection on the power of virtue, he corrects his judgment, (i). Philo- sophy here must be our guide; whereupon he breaks into an enthu- siastic panegyric of philosophy, which is praised as of the utmost service to men, but which is even maligned by some who do not realize its value and antiquity, (2). A brief summary of the earliest philosophy, especially of the wise men of antiquity, follows extend- ing down to Pythagoras who invented the term philosopeer, whom he (Pythagoras) compared to the spectators at the Grecian games, thus earnestly contemplating nature, (3). Philosophy before the time of Socrates was mostly natural philosophy. Socrates applied it to life and morals. Many sects followed. The Socratic method will be pursued, (4) The Auditor says that virtue does not seem to him sufficient to insure a happy life, and maintains that thesis by declaring that, while virtue may exist under torture and on the rack, happiness cannot, (5). Reference is made by M. (Magister?) to the conclusions of the preceding books which quite seem to settle the question ; for if virtue has fortune in her power, and is beyond the reach of fear and anxiety, desire and vain joy, it must insure happi- ness, (6). A. is convinced of his error; notwithstanding, M. pro- ceeds, saying that, while mathematicians prove a point and then leave it, philosophers are accustomed to discuss such points separ- ately; and this is a very important point, for philosophy promises to make man forever happy, (7). The inconsistency of the Academics, especially of Antiochus, is pointed out, who holds that virtue of itself can make happy but not perfectly happy; that things are esti- mated from there predominant constituent; and that there are three classes of evils, and that one can be happy even under evil, (8). The Peripatetics (Theophrastus) reason consistently, but from wrong 8 premises. They hold to three kinds of goods (and corresponding evils) and that evil may befall a good man, destroying happiness. Epicurus is blamed for commending temperance and at the same time making pleasure the chief good, and for defying fortune while regarding pain as the sole or greatest evil, (9). Happiness must be absolute enjoyment of good without any evil ; so virtue, as indis- pensable to happiness, must be the only good. Otherwise the evils corresponding to goods as pain, poverty, etc., might befall the good or wise man, and if regarded as evils be inconsistent with happiness. Aristotle and the Academics cannot be permitted to say that a wise man is always happy and at the same time hold their view of evils, nor can Epicurus with his view of pain, (10). Cicero had endeavored to show in the fourth book de Finibus, that the difference between the Stoics and the Peripatetics on this subject is one of words only, and justifies his inconsistency on the ground of adherence to the Academy. The question here is, admitting that virtue is the only good, is it alone sufficient for a happy life, (n). And this doctrine is due to Plato and before him to Socrates. Plato in the speech of Pericles says that the happy man is unaffected by externals, has con- trol of his passions, and is entirely dependent on himself, (12). Beginning with nature it is shown that every creature (plant or animal) is designed to reach its perfect development, the animal in a higher sphere than the plant, and man, endowed with reason, in the highest sphere that of reason which is identical with virtue ; and, as whatever lacks nothing is happy, virtue in man implies hap- piness. Brutus, Aristotle and the Old Academy believe this, (13). But Cicero holds more, namely, that it implies complete happiness. Those who make three classes of goods must be in doubt, as being dependent on unreliable goods. The happy man must be free from all apprehension of the loss of that which makes happy, and of all fear. Courage that admits any fear is not true courage. Add to courage self-control, and what can be wanting to happiness ? (14). The wise man regards grief and fear as arising from imagined evils, and pleasure and desire from imagined goods and all opposed to reason. He is happy because unaffected by them. The true good produces joy, and is honorable, (i. e. morally good). The honorable alone is good, so that honesty (moral goodness) alone makes a happy life. These cannot be goods of which one may have an abundance, as of wealth, honors, etc., and yet be unhappy. Take away the morally good (honestum) and you take away happi- ness. The honorable is again defined as the only good; if not such, many other things are entitled to be called goods, (15). Nothing external can be called a good in the true sense. The Stoics give the designation preferred to some of the so-called goods of others, but do not, as others do, regard them as essential to happiness, or to the greatest happiness. An argument from Socrates is introduced which is based on the harmony of a man's life with his mental disposition. If his disposition is morally good his life will be the same and there- fore happy. Then follows a resume of arguments witli the con- clusion that a happy life is consequent on virtue, (16). A com- parison between a happy antf an unhappy life is made and leads to the result that only the happy life can have a praiseworthy char- acter, and must therefore be virtuous. Finally the conclusion is reached by a comparison of vice with virtue, that as the former ren- ders life miserable, the latter must render it happy, (17). The reality of the Stoic's proof is again briefly summarized, (18); and for the confirmation of the same a number of examples of virtuous and of wicked statesmen are presented, (19, 20, 21, 22, 23-); also several philosophers are mentioned, and finally the activity and the happi- ness of the wise man is pictured in detail, (-23, 24, 25). Then fol- lows a refutation of the objections which seem to have some force against the Stoic view that virtue is able to produce a happy life, and since the view that pain is an evil is the strongest argument that threatens the proof of that proposition, Cicero reminds us that even Epicurus asserts that he can be happy in spite of the most intense sufferings, and a number of facts and illustrations to the same affect are cited, (26, 27, 28, 29-). Cicero takes advantage of his agnosticism to show a spirit of fair dealing with all views and to show that, how- ever they differ, virtue is still able to insure a happy life. Various opinions of the good are enumerated and some of them discussed. He comes back again to the question of pain, and, in connection with it, of death; pain cannot destroy happiness for the Peripatetics or even the Epicureans, (-29, 30, 31). Poverty twin of pain is next discussed and Epicurus commended. He shows how easily poverty is endured by others as well as by the Stoics, (32, 34, 35). And amid these illustrations are set forth the practical directions of F 10 Epicurus concerning the striving for pleasure, (33). Obscurity also and unpopularity cannot prevent a wise man from being happy, (36); nor can banishment, (37). The same is true of all griefs and anxie- ties, of blindness, and deafness, which afflictions are not to be con- sidered in comparison with the many pleasures of life which are at the command of the wise man. But let all these misfortunes meet in one person, together with acute bodily pain, still he may escape by a voluntary death, (38, 39, 40). If those philosophers who hold the honorable and laudable as of no value can maintain that the wise man is always happy, what must be the case with philosophers who derive from Socrates and Plato ? All come so near together on this question that Cicero expresses his gratification that it is thus satis- factorily solved, and he closes with the remark that he can best alle- viate his own afflictions by devoting his leisure to philosophical study and composition, (41). For a less detailed analysis, see Klotz's Argumentum in the Teub- ner text or in Harper's. III. A BRIEF VIEW OF GREEK AND ROMAN ETHICAL PHILOSOPHY. The earliest philosophy was a natural philosophy. It concerned itself with the problem of nature and the universe, and the individual was lost sight of in the study of the universal. It was not until the Sophists appeared that thought was directed to man instead of nature, and philosophy became subjective. The Sophists were not philosophers in the highest sense. They were rhetoricians and gram- marians and teachers of youth, the professors of the " higher educa- tion," and of u practical " philosophy. However, they did speculate on the nature of human volition and thought, and thus prepared the way for a profounder study of man, for ethics and a better dialectic. There was need of a great genius to rescue philosophy from the chaos into which it had fallen by the study of nature and the per- versions of the Sophists, to take up and extend the principle of sub- jectivism introduced by the latter, and to consider man in his uni- versal as well as his individual nature; to maintain the certainty of moral distinctions, and establish a scientific method for detecting error and determining truth; in a word, to recognize, through the laws of thinking and moral willing, the relation of man to the objec- tive world. Such a genius appeared in Socrates, and although he wrote no treatise, and did not profess to teach, but simply to stimu- late thought by means of keen questioning, he marks an era in philosophy. (a) ETHICAL TEACHINGS OF SOCRATES. SOCRATES was the father of moral philosophy. It is true there had been some ethical speculations by the natural philosophers, par- ticularly by Anaxagoras, by Democritus, and by the Sophists, but it was left for Socrates to investigate the law of conduct. He did not build up a system of ethics, his efforts being limited to testing men and leading them to rigorous self-examination. " The fundamental conception of Socrates was the inseparable union of theoretical insight with practical moral excellence." And so virtue is knowledge, and vice is ignorance. No man willingly sins, but only as the result of ignorance, for every man desires happiness and the only road to happiness is through virtue, while knowledge (scientific knowledge, wisdom) is the sole condition to virtue. " To 12 do wrong wittingly is better than to do right ignorantly. Character and deliberate choice, consequently, were not regarded by Socrates as elements of virtue." Virtue is the necessary result of knowledge, If a man is virtuous he is realizing what is best and truest in himself, he is fulfilling what is best and truest without himself; he "has come to a knowledge evidencing itself in works expressive of the law that is in him, as he is in it." " Therefore the law of virtuous growth is expressed in the maxim 'know thyself; that is, realize thyself; by obedience and self-control come to your full stature." Virtue can be taught, because knowledge can be acquired, and further, because of this unity of virtue and knowledge the virtues are one, having a common essence in wisdom. Thus temperance, friendship, courage, justice and piety are only different expressions of wisdom. The Good is the highest object of knowledge. It is a condition like the gods to have no wants, and the less one wants the nearer he comes to this ideal. External goods confer no advantage. Socrates re- garded physical speculation as unprofitable and even impious, but pious conduct was the just due of Deity, because of his care for men and his manifested wisdom. He believed in an omnipotent and invisible Supreme Being who rules the universe. The greatest of the disciples of Socrates was Plato. There were, however, several others termed the Lesser Socratics, who founded schools, each mainly characterized by some particular feature of the Sbcratic teachings. Of these, two treated chiefly of ethical questions, namely, the Cynic and the Cyrenaic Schools. (b) THE CYNICS. SEE IX. 26, NOTE. ANTISTHENES, the founder of the Cynic school, had been a pupil of Gorgias the Sophist, before coming to Socrates. It is a question whether the name of the school was derived from a gymnasium The Cynosarges where Antistheries taught, or from xvwxoz, dog- gish, from their churlish manners. The Cynics were the ascetics of philosophy, and they magnified the Socratic principle of self-control and superiority to appetite. Virtue is the only good, vice the only evil. Everything else is indifferent. "Virtue is wisdom and the wise man is always perfectly happy because he is self-sufficient and has no wants, no ties and no weaknesses." The Cynic aimed at liberty through self-denial. He did not however despise all pleas- 13 ures as Anthisthenes shows in these remarks, "when I wish a treat I do not go and buy it at great cost in the market place; I find iny storehouse of pleasures in the soul;" and, "follow the pleasures that come after pains, not those which bring pains in their train." He sought to train body and mind so as to attain independence, and so that the very refusal of pleasure would be itself a pleasure. Virtue was declared to be teachable and when once acquired could never be lost. Believing civilization corrupt he sought to return to a state of nature, to become a citizen of the world in distinction from exist- ing society. His ideal is then expressed in the words, liberty, free- speech and independence. This resulted in boorishness, indecency, shabbiness of dress, insolence, and ostentatious asceticism. Hegel truly says, " The Cynics excluded themselves from the sphere in which is true freedom." The most famous of the Cynics was Dio- genes of Sinope. He is described as "conceited, scurrilous, witty, a caricature of Socrates, sleeping in porticoes, coarsely and scantily clad, living on the rudest fare, drinking water from the palm of his hand, violating all rules of decency, railing at whatever and whom- ever he whimsically conceived a dislike to ; an admired, privileged * Dog' indeed." All this excess came from the exaggeration of prin- ciples in themselves good, the superiority of man to his environment, simplicity of life, frankness and sincerity in speech. Stoicism with its mental culture was indebted to cynicism. (c) THE CYRENAICS. ARISTIPPUS of Cyrene founded the Cyrenaic School. Although of a luxurious city and possessed of wealth and fond of good living, he was attracted by Socrates and became his disciple. His means and social condition naturally affected his views. The Socratic doctrine of self-control was capable of interpretations that might lead to very diverse results in the practical conduct of life. Antisthenes and the Cynics, as we have seen, interpreted and applied it in practice with the result of taking pleasure in the very denial of pleasure and in a severely ascetic mode of life. And to some extent they had the example of Socrates to plead in favor of their practice. On the other hand Socrates did sometimes go to great lengths in convivial indulgence, never, however, losing self-control. Pleasure and self- control, with the emphasis on the first, was the fundamental ethical 14 principle of Aristippus. " The Socratic element in the doctrine of Aristippus appears in the principle of self-determination directed by knowledge, and in the control of pleasure as a thing to be acquired through knowledge and culture." The Cyrenaics first gave prominence to a phrase much used later, namely, the end of existence, meaning by it that which is good in and for itself, and not as a means to anything else, and in fact, " sums up the good in existence." With them the end oi life is pleasure; hence the term Hedonism (from -fjdovr], pleasure) often applied to the school. The pleasure meant is the pleasure of each moment, with little regard for the past or the future, the present only being in our power. Virtue, the good, and pleasure are identical. The wise man is therefore the man who enjoys pleasure but keeps it under his con- trol; but wisdom intellectual culture is essential to this enjoy- ment. The sage is subject to grief and fear. He is not always happy. All pleasures as such are good and equally desirable, whether arising from a good or bad cause or source. " Duration and degree determines their worth." Pleasure is defined as a gentle motion, " a tranquil activity of the being, like the gently heaving sea, midway between violent motion which was pain and absolute calm which was insensibility." It was not mere absence of pain, but something positive. The criterion of truth for each man is his feeling of the moment. There is therefore no common criterion of good or truth. Although we may use the same words the thing indicated will vary with each man. This is like the teaching of the Sophist Protagoras. Aristippus is said to have been much at the courts of the Dionysii the elder and the younger, at Syracuse, and to have met Plato at both. Arete, the daughter of Aristippus, was among his prominent disciples, and her son, the younger Aristippus, was of great service to the school by giving it systematic form. Modification of the doc- trines came through the discovery of their incompatibility. For what consistency is there in holding that the pleasure of the moment is the highest good, and at the same time that the wise man controls pleasure and is not controlled by it ? Too much scope is thus given to external circumstances, too little to wisdom. Nearly a century after Aristippus, therefore, Theodorus, the Atheist, substituted for the passing pleasure, which he held to be indifferent,*" a calm and cheerful frame of mind." See I. XLIII. 102; V. XL. 117. Euhem- erus, the Rationalist, taught that " belief in the existence of gods, began with the veneration of distinguished men." Hegesias, con- vinced that there is more pain than pleasure in life, held that the highest good is to avoid trouble; "he despaired of positive happiness and considered life to be intrinsically valueless," which comes near to the conclusions of the Cynics. I. XXXIV. 83. (d) PLATO. PLATO. The Platonic Ethics are so related to his Theory of Ideas that a brief statement of that theory is necessary. Aristotle states that Plato's mind was influenced, first, by the Heraclitean doctrine of the constant flux*br flow of things in the Universe and the conclusion from this that there can be no absolute knowledge; and second, by Socrates' perpetually searching for definition, and, in his ethical inquiries, always seeking for universals. Plato accepted the view that there must be conceptions that are ever invariable and he reasoned that these could not belong to the objects of sense, be- cause these are constantly changing, but to another kind of existence. Thus he conceives "of universals as forms or ideas of real existences." Any concrete object, for example, as a book, affords us a passing sensation merely, but we may rise by abstraction to the contempla- tion of the ideal of book which is a universal. [It was with reference to this doctrine that Antisthenes remarked, "O Plato, I see horses, but no horseness." Whereupon Plato replied that it was because he had no eye for it.] "If we approach the Ideal from below, from the concrete particulars, it takes the form of the class, the common name, the definition, the concept, the Idea; but this is an incomplete view of it. The Ideal exists apart from, and prior to, all concrete embodiment. It is the eternal archetype of which the sensible objects are the copies. It is because the soul in its pre-existent state is already familiar with this archetype, that it is capable of being reminded of it when it sees its shadow in the phenomenal existences which make up the world of sense." The highest of all the Ideas is the Idea of the Good which he identifies with God, the first great Cause, the Supreme Intelligence. Further, he says, "The soul is that which most partakes of the Divine." It is by virtue of this that we are capable of knowledge. This participation in the i6 divine Idea is the connection between the divine and the human reason and provides man with the primordial laws of thought and reason. But these Ideas are regarded by Plato as the archetypes, as " the eternal patterns to which the artificer of the world looks in framing the world." Phenomenal objects participate in Ideas, and thus in some sense picture the world of reason. Ideas are noumenal entities corresponding to types or classes of phenomenal existencies. The idea of the Beautiful, for example, Plato terms the Beautiful per se, in distinction from beautiful objects, and says it is not simply a conception, but exists as a substance of and by itself; and all beautiful objects participate in it. But all of Plato's philosophy has an ethical character and a prac- tical purpose as might be expected of a disciple of Socrates. This is seen in his conception of the Idea of the Good as the highest of all, instead of the Idea of Being; but the former may be thought quite as universal as the latter, since every truly existent object is neces- sarily good. He views perfect Wisdom as identical with perfect Goodness, which is God, and makes the highest good for man the summum bonum the supreme end of life, consist in the greatest possible likeness to God. And this likeness "is affected by that yearning after the ideal which we know by the name of Love." God is thus the absolutely good and the cause and end of all knowledge. " The possession of the good is happiness. Happiness depends on culture and justice or on the possession of moral beauty and good- ness." In the Philebus Plato speaks of the Good as including measure, beauty, and symmetry as well as "mind," "pleasure," and " causality." Virtue is the fitness of the soul for its proper duties. Justice is the universal virtue, and " perfect virtue arises when wisdom, cour- age and temperance, (the other three cardinal virtues), are bound together by justice." In the Republic he states " that the best and justest man is also the happiest, and that this is he who is the most royal master of himself; and that the worst and most unjust man is also the most miserable and that "this is he who is the greatest tyrant of himself and of his state." It may be well to insert here a few words on the nature of the soul. The soul is conceived by Plato to be threefold, the immortal, divine, rational part having its seat in the head, is united to the mortal part consisting of two portions, the courageous, which is located in the heart, and the appetitive (desire), whose location is in the lower part of the trunk. The indulgence of desires brings neither virtue nor happiness. They must be restrained to secure such a result. Pleasure results from the preservation of an inward harmony, pain from the lack of harmony. The following additional statements of Plato's views are from Dio- genes Laertius : "There are three classes of goods, viz. those of the mind, those of the body, and those that are wholly external. The four cardinal principles may be named as of the first class, health and strength of the second, friends and wealth of the third." "A per- fectly happy man is one whose happiness consists of wisdom in counsel, a good condition of the sensations and health of body, good fortune, good reputation and riches." " There are evils cor- responding to the goods and a third class which are neutral or in- different." " On the subject of good and evil, these were his senti- ments : that the end was to become like God; and that virtue was sufficient of herself for happiness, but nevertheless required the advantages of the body as instruments to work with; such as health, strength, the integrity of the senses, and things of that kind; and also external advantages, such as riches, and noble birth, and glory. Still that the wise man would be not the less happy, even if desti- tute of these auxiliary circumstances; for he would enjoy the consti- tution of his country, and would marry, and would not transgress the established laws, and that he would legislate for his country, as well as he could under existing circumstances, unless he saw affairs in an unmanageable condition, in consequence of the excessive factiousness of the people And he was the first person who defined the notion of the honorable, as that which borders on the praiseworthy, and the logical, and the useful, and the becoming, and the expedient, all which things are combined with that which is suitable to, and in accordance with, nature." (e) THE ACADEMIES. These are distinguished as the Old, Middle, and New or Reformed Academies, embracing five schools, viz: the Old, the first school; the Middle, the second and third schools; and the New, the fourth i8 and fifth schools. This is the distinction made by the later writers. Cicero recognized only the Old and the New Academy, the latter corresponding to what is here termed the Middle Academy, but including Philo. Antiochus himself claimed to be a true representa- tive of the Old Academy. Zeller knows the school of Arcesilaus and Carneades as the New Academy. And thus Cicero may be classed, in so far as he accepts the doctrine of the Academy, as belonging either to the Middle, or to the New Academy. (i) The Old Academy. See X. 30, Note. Speusippus, Plato's nephew, was his uncle's successor at the head of the Academy. He was followed by Xenocrates, he by Polemo, and he by Crates. Other names are Heraclides of Pontus, Hermo- dorus and Grantor, to whose writings Cicero is indebted in his Con- solatio and his Tusculan Disputations. Without treating of the special characteristics of individual views, it may be stated that in general the ethical theory of the Old Academy does not depart widely from that of Plato. While virtue is held to be the highest good it requires the addition of external goods to make life agree- able, that is, to produce a happy life. "Follow nature" was a pre- cept of Xenocrates, Speusippus and Polemo, was the practice of the Cynics, and was adopted as a Stoic maxim but was not uniformly interpreted. (2) The Middle Academy. This was sceptical and is discussed by Zeller under the head of the Sceptics. The leading minds were Arcesilaus and Carneades, founders respectively of the second and third Academic schools. In respect to cognition they held that knowledge is not attainable and that probability is the utmost advance that can be made in the direction of knowledge. They professed to follow the example of Socrates, but complained that he approached too near to dogmatism when he said that he knew that he knew nothing. Carneades held that probability is of several degrees. "The lowest degree of probability arises when a notion produces by itself an impression of truth, without being taken in connection with other notions. The next higher degree is when that impression is confirmed by the agreement of all notions which are related to it. The third and 19 highest degree is when an investigation of all these notions results in producing the same corroboration for all. In the first case a notion is called probable; in the second probable and undisputed; in the third, probable, undisputed and tested." His ethical views were tinctured by his scepticism. To understand his position one should first note carefully the Stoic views which he combats. He could not " allow scientific certainty to any of the various opinions respecting the nature and aim of moral action; and in this point he attacked the Stoics with steady home-thrusts. Their inconsistency in calling the choice of what is natural the highest business of morality, and yet not allowing to that which is according to nature a place among goods, was so trenchantly exposed by him that Anti- pater is said to have been brought to admit that not the objects to which choice is directed, but the actual choice itself is a good." "The real meaning of Carneades can only be that virtue consists in an activity directed towards the possession of what is according to nature, and hence that it cannot as the highest Good be separated from accordance with nature. For the same reason, virtue supplies all that is requisite for happiness." (3) The New Academy. This was an eclectic school and notes a return to dogmatism. Philo of Larissa and Antiochus of Ascalon, his pupil, to both of whom Cicero had listened, were the founders respectively of the fourth and fifth schools. Both revert to Plato and hold that truth is attainable. Antiochus endeavored to show that the principal doctrines of the Stoics are to be found in Plato and that there is essential agreement between these and Aristotle as well. Ethics. " Starting with the Stoic prima naturae, but enlarging their scope so as to take in not only all that belongs to self-preserva- tion, but the rudiments of virtue and knowledge also, and defining the Summum Bonum as a life in accordance with the perfect nature of man, Antiochus includes under this, not only the perfection of reason, but all bodily and external good. Virtue in itself suffices for happiness, as the Stoics said, but not for the highest happiness; here we must borrow a little from the Peripatetics; though they err in allowing too much weight to external goods, as the Stoics err in the opposite direction." 2O (f) ARISTOTLE. SEE X. 30, NOTE. Our purpose requires only a brief settlement of Aristotle's ethical views. He rejects Plato's idea of the absolute Good the cause of all existence and all knowledge and says, "If there is any one good, universal and generic, or transcendental and absolute, it obviously never can be realized nor possessed by man ; whereas something of this latter kind is what we are inquiring after." What he seeks to know is what is good for man. Now the chief good is identical with " the final and perfect end of all action." The peculiar work or end of man is rational activity, because man is a rational creature, and such activity is in harmony with his nature. Virtue is not exactly knowledge or science as Socrates taught, it is rather an art and is to be attained by exercise. So man attains good not through knowledge, but through exercise and habit. Aris- totle means by habit a fixed and definite power or tendency of the soul, a natural instinct, not simply a mode of action. Men realize the good through nature, reason and habit ; for we must practice moral acts in order to be virtuous as the musician practices music in order to become skilled. The end of the activity of man, which is his highest good, the realization of the soul's peculiar excellence, is happiness, which depends on the continuous virtuous and rational activity of the soul. "Happiness is a perfect practical activity in a perfect life." But complete happiness cannot result from virtue alone ; it requires be- sides the goods of the soul, the goods of the body, as health, strength, etc., external goods, as wealth, friends, etc.; and pleasures as well. Vice, however, is sufficient to cause unhappiness even if bodily and external goods are present in the highest degree. Pleasure is the blossom and natural culmination of activity. To determine the moral quality of pleasure the perfect man must be the standard. That is true pleasure which is pleasure to him. All virtues are either intellectual, resulting chiefly from instruction, or ethical resulting from habit. The former refers to the reason rightly developing its own activities, and consists of reason, science, art and practical intelligence. The ethical virtues refer to the subjection of the lower functions to reason, and are courage, temperance, liberality and magnificence, high-mindedness and love of honor, 21 mildness, truthfulness, urbanity and friendship and justice. " Jus- tice is the most perfect virtue because it is the perfect exercise of all virtue." The function of the reason in connection with the desires is to determine the mean, i. 6z, wise, used by the older sages, belongs only to deity, quid: interresset, what difference there is. 9. mercatum eum, that festival assemblage. Mayor says, the Olympic games. Ace. instead of dat. with similem. maximo apparatu, the most splendid representation. Abl. accompaniment, celebritate, numerous concourse; manner, lit peterent: etc. com- parative clause of manner; subordinate in ind. discourse, quaestu et lucro: the terms are similar the former signifying the steady gains of a regular occupation ; the latter, gains earned and deserved. visendi perspicerent: Cf. I. XIX. 44 ; visere, perspiciendisque. The former is the intensive from videre, the latter passes over to the idea of mental vision, contemplation, mercatus: gen. ex alia vita: The doctrine of the transmigration of souls, intuerenter, contemplate, spectare, to behold, as a theatrical representation, id CSt enim, for that is the meaning of. liberalissimum, the most noble occupation; predicate for both spectare and praestare. omni- bus studiis=0*#/ifatf aliis studiis. in vita praestare: as the Greeks viewed it ; the Romans were intensely practical. IV. 10. rerum: /. e. philosophic doctrines, in Italiam: to Croton. quae magna dicta CSt: Graecia Magna or Major was a name given, not to Southern Italy, but to districts there settled and inhabited by Greeks. Even Cumae and Neapolis were included. How the designation originated is unknown, privatim et publice institutis et artibus: Chiasmus, for privatim belongs to artibus (disciplina), publice to institutis. ab antiqua philosophia : from Thales, Pythagoras, etc. Socratem; of Athens, 469-399 B. C. It would be difficult to overestimate his influence on philosophy. Archelaum : of Athens or Miletus. Flourished about 450 B. C. Said to have made an advance on his teacher, Anaxagoras, in moral speculation. Was surnamed Physicus. Anax- agorae: Anaxagoras, 500 428 B. C. was a native of Clazomenae, but removed to Athens and gave philosophy a home in that city. He was the friend and teacher of Pericles and Euripides, and Socrates listened to his teaching. He assumed two principles a material principle, a medley of an infinite number of " seeds" of things, and a spiritual principle an independent intelligence oper- ating on matter. Later philosophers termed his material elements or " seeds", homoeomeria, i. e. particles of like kind with them- selves and with the whole that is made up of them, thus differing from the atoms of Democritus which give rise to the different quali- ties of their compounds by the mode of composition, numeri: Cf. I. X. 20 ; XVII. 38, nisi quid erat numeris aut descriptionibus expli- candum. et before CUncta caelestia, and generally. The Pytha- goreans speculated about the "five" planets and the fixed stars, and the Sophists included astronomy in their teachings. Socrates. . . . primus: etc. /. e. Socrates was the first moral philosopher, the first to direct his attention inward, to study man, to make practical application of the Delphic inscription "know thyself". See INTRO- DUCTION, e caelo; /. sa)v, the best of painters. 115. Anaxagoras ; See IV. 10. Anaxagoras died in quasi ban- ishment at Lampsacus. He gave philosophy a home at Athens, and is above all distinguished as the first philosopher to introduce a spiritual element beside the material a sort of dualism. Cf. I. XLIII. 104. Tiresiam ; The blind soothsayer of Thebes. His blindness is variously accounted for. He possessed the gift of proph- ecy, and figures in the wars of the Seven against Thebes and the Epigoni. Polyphemum : Cicero seems to be in error in referring this story to Homer as it does not occur there. There were different conceptions of the Cyclopes, (round-eyed ones) among the ancients. Hesiod makes them the sons of Uranus and Gaea, and three in number, with a single eye in the forehead. They later forged Jove's thunderbolts. Homer represents them as living a pastoral life, and a later age placed them in Sicily and identified them with the Cy- clopes of Hesiod. Polyphemus appears in Homer as suffering the deprivation of his eye by the cunning device of Odysseus. A later legend made him the lover of the nymph Galatea, and the poets Philoxenus and Theocritus have made the story famous. Propertius says, "quin etiam, Polypheme, fera Galatea sub Aetna ad tua rorantes carmina flexit equos." It was a third variety of Cyclopes that built the Cyclopean walls at Mycenae, Tiryns, Argos, etc. colloquentem facit eiusque laudare fortunas : Observe the two constructions after facit, in the sense of representing. Z. 618. Note; A. 292. e; H. 535. I. 4, and see Lex. s. v. B. 4 (7-). fortunas ; For other in- stances of the use of the plural for the sing, of this word, see Lex. s. for tuna, 2. B. fin. XL. 116. surdaster : a form of the diminutive, of rare occur- rence. This word occurs only here. Cf. oleaster, parasitaster , pi- naster, and our poetaster. See Roby, vol. I. 889. M. Crassus : surnamed Dives, the triumvir. He was a shrewd speculator, and had the reputation of being avaricious, male audiebat: The word 8i audire has here the sense " to be named, or styled somehow" (as Greek dxouw). Thus male audtre=to be in ill repute, to hear evil of one's self =xaxa)<; dxoueev. Cicero plays upon words ; for being a little deaf (surdaster), male audiebat would be true of Crassus in two senses. See Lex. s. audio II. D. Epicure! : This word is found in all mss. Wolf rejects it. It may be simply one of Cicero's thrusts at the school whose teachings he opposes. Cf. I. III. 5, 6. omnesque [id] Surdi : id is omitted in some mss. If it stands, it makes with surdi an anacoluthon. A better reading is item in place of fd, and remove the brackets from surdi. legendis his : his=cantibus, i. e. the words or verses. 117. paulo ante ; At ^XXXVIII. in. secum loqui : See XXXVI. 103. captus sit=privatus sit. See Lex. s. capio I. B. i. e. primum ; correlative to sin forte, quid est....quod laboremus ; A. 320; H. 503. I. Note 2, portus enim praesto est ; Cf. I. XXX. 74. In the Stoic ethics life is regarded as among things indifferent, suicide is permitted as a rational means of termi- nating it, but only by the sage, ibidem ; at the time when suffer- ing most. This word is omitted by some editors, and Bentley omits as a silly gloss quoniam mors ibidem est, and T. brackets the words. Others insert quidem after quoniam. nihil sentiendi ; Cf. I. XLIII. 102, de nihil sentiendo. Theodorus : of Cyrene, designated as the Atheist, a disciple of Aristippus, the founder of the Cyrenaic school. See INTRODUCTION. He went to Athens and later to Alexandria, finally returning to Cyrene. While in the service of Ptolemy, king of the Macedonian dynasty in Egypt, he was sent as an embassy to Lysimachus, king of Thrace, who threatened to crucify him on account of his freedom of speech. Cf. I. XLIII. 102. vero ; iron- ical. Cantharidis vim ; the cantharis was used by the ancients as a poison. It is a question whether it was the same insect that is now known by that name the Spanish fly which is bruised and used as a vesicatory. Cic. says, C. Carbo, accusante L. Crasso, Can- tharidas sumpsisse dicitur. Ad. Fam. IX. 21.3. 1 1 8. Paulus ; L, Aemilius Paulus Macedonicus (230-160 B.C.) was one of the most upright of the Roman nobles. In his second consulship, 168 B. C., he defeated (on June 2d) at Pydna, the last king of Macedonia, Perses. The triumph of Paulus was celebrated 82 Nov. 3oth, 167, and before the triumphal car walked the captive king and his children. Persi J Perses was cast into a dungeon after the triumph of Paulus, but was released at the intercession of the latter and permitted to end his days in an honorable captivity at Alba. Perses is declined as an a or e stem, but Sallust and Tacitus write the gen. Persi, and Cicero and Livy have the same form for the dative. In this passage some editors have Persae, and Roby I. 482, remarks, " The name of the Macedonian king Perseus had an e stem used in Cicero, and an eu stem used in Livy. Other writers generally follow Livy." XLI. obtinetur, is observed; not obtinet because this verb is never neuter in Cicero. See Lex. aut bibat and abeat : The Greek has y nWe ^ oxide, either drink or depart, and the German sauf oder lauf. inquit: indefinite subject, violentiam vinolentorum : A play upon words. Cf. III. XXVII. 64, Pueros vero matres.... castigare . . . . solent, nee verbis solum, sed etiam verberibus. Haec eadem : See XXXVIII. no, and II. VI. 15. Hieronymus : of Rhodes, a Peripatetic. See XXX. 84. He held that the highest good consists in freedom from pain, cf. II. VI. 15 ; while Aristotle taught that complete happiness results from the rational and virtuous activity of the soul, together with the presence of certain external goods. See IX. 25, note. 119. ut virtus per se ipsa nihil valeat : What was the Epi- curean view of the relation of virtue to pleasure ? profectis : from proficiscor. Dat. Quorum alii: The Peripatetics and the Academ- ics. See XVI. 47 ; XXVI. 75 and notes, alii autem : The Stoics. See VIII. 22 ; X. 29, note. 120. honorarius arbiter : i.e. chosen by the parties and not by the praetor. For the functions, etc. of the arbiter see Morey's Outlines of Roman Law, pg. 390. Carneades : See XXIX. 83, note. commoda=praeaj>ua. See XVI. 47, note, causam esse discrepandi: Cf. XXVI. 75, note, hunc locum, this point; i.e. respecting the summum bonum, and that a wise man lives happily. ceterarum disciplinarum : Of other schools than those just men- tioned, which in re if not in verbis agreed with one another. VOCC= sententia. 121. eundum : To the city from his Tusculan villa, ubi, wherein hoiv. cuicuimodi : Roby I. 382; A. 105, . Note;H. 83 187. 4- Note, alteros quinque: He had already written and dedi- cated to Brutus the five books De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. lacessiti : Cic. may refer to Brutus' work, De Virtute, which was dedicated to him. See I. i. profuturi simus dixerim : Ob- serve the change of number. It is not probable that Cicero intended to include Brutus in the plural verb any more than in the nostris following. Without doubt Cicero alleviated very materially his personal sor- rows and his political anxieties by the congenial diversion of philo- sophical study and composition. ([UNIVERSITY ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY, Outline Lectures and Notes. DEPARTMENT 198 Main Stacks DUE AS STAMPED BELOW FORM NO. DD6 50M 1-05 U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES cooacni'm