ii|ir<liiiiiii 
 M 013 171 
 
 V 
 
 
 .~^ 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 i: 
 
 ,^ 
 
 o 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 I) 
 
OF THK 
 
 University of California. 
 
 OIl^T (11 ^" 
 
 Mrs. SARAH P. WALSWORTH. 
 
 Received October, i8g4. 
 zAcccssions No.^^SZ) ^- Class No. 
 
 A 
 
L.ECTURES 
 
 v — 
 FUTURE PUNISHMENT* 
 
 BY EDWARD R. TYLER, 
 
 PASTOR OP THE SOUTH CHDRCh/SiIDDLETOWN, C0NN„ 
 
 " Our God is a consuming fire." 
 ' Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth.* 
 
 MIDDLETOWN, CONN. 
 
 PRINTED BY PARMELEE & GREENFIELB. 
 
 1829. 
 
£T c-^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT, SS. 
 ,♦«*<*♦, BE IT REMEMBERED, That on the twenty- 
 
 II. s. f eighth day of February, in the fifty-third year of the 
 1 ' ' I Independence of the United States of America, Ed- 
 ^^*****" WARD R. Ttlkr, of the said District, hath deposit- 
 ed in this office the title of a Book, the right whereof he claims 
 as Author, in the words following, to wit : 
 " Lectures on Future Pumskment. By Edward R. Tyler, Pastor 
 of the South Church, Middletoicn, Conn. 
 " Our God is a consuming fire." 
 
 " Am I therefore, become your enemy because I tell you the 
 truth." " 
 in conformity to the act of Congress of the United States, enti- 
 tled, " An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the 
 copies of Maps, Charts and Books, to the authors and proprietors 
 of such copies, during the times therein mentioned." And also 
 to the act, entitled, " An act supplementary to an act, entitled, 
 * An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing tlic co- 
 pies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of 
 such copies during the times herein mentioned,' and extending 
 the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, engraving, and etch- 
 ing historical and other prints " 
 
 CHAS. A. INGERSOLL, 
 
 Clerk of the District of Connecticut. 
 \ true copy of Record, examined and sealed by me. 
 CHAS. A. INGERSOLL, 
 
 Clerk of the District of Connecticut. 
 

 This volume is dedicated to the South Church and Society, m 
 Middletown, by their afFectionate Pastor, 
 
 EDWARD R. TYLER. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 ^ 
 
 Page. 
 LECTURE I. 
 The Certainty of Future Punishment proved from the 
 use of Gehenna 5 
 
 LECTURE II. 
 
 The Certainty of Future Punishment from the use 
 of Hades 34 
 
 LECTURE III. 
 
 The Certainty of Future Punishment from Miscella- 
 neous passages 51 
 
 LECTURE IV. 
 
 The Gradations of Future Punishment 73 
 
 LECTURE V. 
 
 The Duration of Future Punishment. ... 91 
 
 LECTURE VL 
 
 The Duration of Future Punishment. ... 120 
 
 LECTURE VII. 
 
 The Nature of Future Punishment 142 
 
 LECTURE VIIL 
 
 The Justice of Future Punishment 167 
 
LECTURE I. 
 
 IHE CERTALNTY OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT FROM 
 THE USE OF GEHENNA. 
 
 SIatthew v. 22 
 
 ind wliosoever shall say^ thou fool^ sliall be in 
 danger of hell-fire. 
 
 The futiiTR punishment of the wicked is a 
 doctrine of Christianity. A subject of such 
 intense interest and practical importance, 
 canaot be too deeply impressed upon the 
 understanding and heart. Entertaining a firm 
 conviction of this, I cannot feel my duty dis- 
 charged without laying the evidence of the 
 doctrine before those for whose rehgious views 
 I am accountable. 
 
 I shall first attempt to show, that punish- 
 ment will be inflicted, leaving the question of 
 its duration for subsequent consideration. 
 
 Gehmria,, the Hoorew word translated hell 
 n the text, has generally been considered the 
 2 
 
name of a place of torment in the future 
 world. It originally signified a valley adjacent 
 to Jerusalem, in which the Israelites estab- 
 lished the worship of Moloch, under the form 
 of a brazen image, to which they offered their 
 own children in sacrific e. permitting them to 
 fall from the arms of the idol into a furnace of 
 fire. After the captivity, the Jews who re- 
 garded this spot with detestation on account 
 of the abominations which had been practised 
 there, threw into it every species of filth, the 
 carcases of animals, and the dead bodies of 
 malefactors. To prevent the pestilence which 
 would be occasioned, if such a mass was left 
 gradually to decay, constant fires were main- 
 tained. From this circumstance, the place 
 afterwards assumed the name of the valley 
 of fire. Such then is the primary or original 
 import of Gehenna. 
 
 In the time of Christ, however, it had as- 
 gumed a secondary and metaphorical sense, 
 being employed as the name of a place of 
 torment, in which the Jews believed that 
 demons and the souls of wicked men are to 
 be pimished in eternal fire. Nor was it used 
 in any other metaphorical stnse. It always 
 denoted the valley of Hinnom, or the place of 
 
future punishment. In the Old Testament, it 
 is found in its original import only, and not, as 
 some assert, as an emblem of the destruction 
 of Jerusalem. In the supposed predictions of 
 that event, recorded in the seventh and nine- 
 teenth chapters of Jeremiah, Gehenna is mea- 
 tioned as the theatre of those abominations, 
 for v/hichthe city was ultimately to be destroy- 
 ed. But the Prophet does not make it an 
 emblem of that catastrophe, nor of any other. 
 Nor have I discovered, that the Jews at any pe- 
 riod were accustomed to express severe tem- 
 poral calamities by a metaphorical use of this 
 name. The only secondary sense attached to 
 it in the time of Christ, is that which is adopt- 
 ed by all sound interpreters of the bible. But 
 the most important point, in determining its 
 import in the New Testament, is the manner in 
 which the sacred penmen employ it, or those 
 circumstances of narration, which contribute to 
 unfold its meaning. This must always be the 
 most satisfactory mode of settling the signifi- 
 cation of terms, since the same word may be 
 used by different writers in very different 
 senses. No one, however, is allowed to de- 
 part from common usage without explaining 
 the nevj sense of his terms. Such an explana- 
 
8 
 
 tion we shall, therefore, find in the texts where 
 Gehenna occurs, or else it must be consider- 
 ed a place of torment in the future state. 
 This view of the case throws the burden of 
 proof upon those who deny it this sense in the 
 ^ew Testament. It devolves upon them to 
 prove that Christ departed from popular 
 usage. 
 
 With these explanations respecting the 
 meaning of Gehenna both in its original and 
 secondary applications, I proceed to show 
 that in nearly all the passages where it occurs, 
 it can mean only a place of future misery. It 
 has the same metaphorical sense in the New 
 Testament which it had acquired before the 
 christian dispensation commenced. 
 
 The text is introduced for the sake of teach- 
 ing the sinfulness of bad passions and mali- 
 cious language. Such sins are no less worthy 
 of punishment than those overt acts of disobe- 
 dience which are commonly acknowledged to 
 be proper subjects of retribution. *' Ye have 
 heard that it was said by them of old time ; 
 tliou shalt not kill, and whosoever shall kill 
 shall be in danger of the ji>dgment ; but I say 
 unto you that whosoever is Af/'n-?-?/ with his bro- 
 ther without a cause, sliall be in daui^cr of the 
 
judgment, and whosoever shall say io his 
 brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the coun- 
 cil, but whosoever shall say, thou fool, shall 
 be in danger of hell fire." The judgment, 
 it should be remarked, was a court established 
 in each town to take cognizance of offences 
 within its own limits, but having its decisions 
 subject to an appeal to the council or Sanhe- 
 drim, the supreme tribunal of the nation. 
 This then appears to be the sense of the text. 
 Whosoever is angry with his brother without a 
 cause^ deserves such a punishment as the judg- 
 ment is empowered to inflict^ and whosoever shall 
 express his anger in loords of contempt deserves 
 the vengeance of the Sanhedrim ; hut whosoever 
 shall say thou miscreant, deserves hell-fire. That 
 this last expression points to the displeasure of 
 God in the next life is highly probable, because 
 the severest capital punishments peculiar to 
 the Jews were pronounced by the Sanhedrim. 
 And from the manner in which Christ teaches 
 the sinfulness of evil thoughts, it appears that 
 he applies the name hell-fire to some punish- 
 ment which actually follows disobedience. He 
 admits the propriety of punishing men in these 
 various ways and with various degrees of se- 
 verity, but contends at the same time, that 
 2* 
 
10 
 
 they deserve these penalties, not for overiL 
 offences only, but far unlawful words and 
 feelings. He teaches them the spirituality of 
 the law by asserting that the threatening? di- 
 rected against wicked deeds, respect also 
 the state of the heart, and will actually be exe- 
 cuted against the unholy desires and feelings 
 of the mind, of which human law can make 
 no account, and which men are prone to 
 think God will not regard. In doing this he 
 could properly name such punishments only, 
 as were known to be denounced against overt 
 transgression. To illustrate the evil nature 
 of sin in its incipient and immature stages, 
 he would not mention a punishment not 
 known to have been threatened against 
 the most open and flagrant wickedness. It 
 is therefore my firm persuasion, that Christ 
 intended to carry the illustration through 
 all the threatenings denounced against sin. 
 He would say to his disciples, you acknow- 
 ledge that certain actions justly expose men 
 to punishments in this life and in that whicii 
 is to come, but I tell you that these wicked 
 actions merely conceived in the heart or ex- 
 pressed by the lips, expose them to the same 
 penalties. But there are additional reason?^ 
 
for supposing that reference is made in the 
 text to future punishment. In proof of this I 
 would refer to the following passages m it& 
 immediate neighbourhood, •• Whosoever, 
 therefore shall break one of these least com- 
 mandments and shall teach men so, he shall 
 be called the least in the kingdom of Heaven,'" 
 that is, shall be excluded from the bliss of the 
 Redeemer's kingdom. '-For I say unto you, 
 that except your righteousne-^s shall ex- 
 ceed the righteousness of the scribes and 
 pharisees ye shall in no case enter into the 
 kingdom of Heaven." '' Agree with thine 
 adversary quickly, whilst thou art in the way 
 with him, lest at any time the adversary de- 
 liver thee to the officer and thou be cast into 
 prison." Exclusion from the kingdom of 
 heaven is in these passages made the penal- 
 ty of disobedience. The Pharisees and 
 all whose claims to the approbation of God 
 are no better founded, will never participate in 
 the benefits of Christ's death. That the con- 
 sequences of such an exclusion extend beyond 
 the grave, is apparent from the spiritual nature 
 of the Redeemer's kingdom. The connexion 
 shows that hell-fire denotes the same punish- 
 ment. But what fixes the sense of Gehenna 
 
12 
 
 in the text with the greatest certainty is its re- 
 peated use in the same chapter with more de- 
 terminate adjuncts. '' And if thy right eye of- 
 fend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee : 
 for it is profitable for thee that one of thy 
 members should perish, and not that thy 
 whole body should be cast into hell. And if 
 thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast 
 it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that 
 one of thy members should perish and not 
 that thy whole body should be cast into hell.'''' 
 In these verses it has doubtless the same 
 meaning as in the text. But before we inquire 
 what it is, it may be well to explain other ex- 
 pressions here employed. The right hand 
 and the right eye being those members of the 
 body which are most highly prized, represent 
 the objects of this world which we hold most 
 dear ; to offend, means to lead into sin ; and the 
 whole body, in contradistinction to one eye or 
 one hand the representatives of the dearest 
 earthly enjoyments, means happiness on the 
 the largest scale, inclusive of this life and that 
 which is to come. The sense of the passage 
 will therefore be this. If the enjoyments of the 
 world lead you into sin, renounce them, for it 
 is profitable for you, to be deprived of the en- 
 
13 
 
 joyments of this life, rather than to lose all your 
 happiness in hell. Here, it may be suitable 
 to remark, that our Lord is not speaking of 
 an exposure to be burned alive in the valley of 
 Hinnom, for of that no one v^as in danger ; 
 nor, of exposure to perish in the destruction 
 of Jerusalem, or to lose their lives in any oth- 
 er way ; for the yielding up of the life is no 
 greater sacrifice than is mtended by plucking 
 out an eye, and cutting off a hand, since these 
 members of the body are the representatives 
 of those temporal objects which are dearest to 
 the human heart, among which life is the 
 most conspicuous. Of the principle here in- 
 volved, the following passage is an admirable 
 illustration. " For whosoever will save his life 
 shall lose it : and whosoever will lose his life 
 for my sake shall find it ;" the sense of which 
 is, that whosoever, through fear of losing his 
 life, shrinks from his duty to CLrist, shall lose 
 his happinef^-^ beyond the grave, and that 
 whosoever is willing to surrendei his life for 
 Christ, shall serure his eternal ha^^j.iness. It 
 is then nearly certain, that Gehenna ^s employ- 
 ed in this chapter for a place of punibhment in 
 the future star. This is the only sense which 
 meets the nect.-.-ities of the passage in which 
 
14 
 
 it occurs. But let it be admitted, that thus 
 far no certain conclusion in respect to its sig- ' 
 nification lias been obtained. Examine it ia 
 other connexions, where the meaning is more 
 decisively fixed. Such an instance is found 
 in the eighteenth chapter of the same gospel. 
 "Wherefore, if thy hand or thy foot offend 
 thee, cut them off and cast them from thee : it 
 is better for thee to enter into life halt or 
 maimed, rather than having two hands or two 
 feet, to be cast into everlasting fire. And if 
 thine eye offend thee, pluck it out and cast it 
 from thee : it is better for thee to enter into life 
 with one eye rather than having two eyes, to 
 be cast into hell fire'' A part of the language 
 here used has already been explained ; the 
 remainder demands our attention. To enter 
 into life is to enter into heaven. Life is often 
 used in this sense. ''■ These shall go away 
 into everlasting punishment, but the righteous 
 into life eternal." '' And they that are in their 
 graves, shall come forth, some to the resurrec- 
 tion of ///e." '•T am the way, the truth and 
 the ///<?," the author of eternal happiness. 
 »' Because strait is the gate and narrow is the 
 way thai leadeth unto ///r," unto (ternal hap- 
 piness. In this place, it can have no otiier 
 
15 
 
 import. It cannot mean the present life, for 
 on thai the persons who are addressed have 
 already entered; it cannot denote any of the 
 enjoyments of this life, of which men will fail 
 unless they sacrifice a right hand or a right 
 eye : for it is said to be better for them to re- 
 nounce these present objects of affection and 
 desire, rather than to fail of entering into life, 
 plainly implying, that they are not the same: 
 nor does it mean, to enter into the kmgdom of 
 God, merely as respects its temporal bene- 
 fits. It may, and doubtless does mean, to 
 enter into the kingdom of God, when that 
 kingdom is viewed as extending beyond the 
 grave, fn this sense, to enter into the king- 
 dom of heaven, is to enter into eternal happi- 
 ness. But if it procures nothing but temporal 
 blessings, and is not indissolubly connected 
 with eternal happiness, to enter into life can- 
 not be a synonymous expression. For, in ad- 
 dition to what has been said, professing the 
 name of Christ did not secure the primitive 
 disciples from losing their lives in as horrid 
 forms as they did, who perished at the vseige 
 of Jerusalem. Most of the apostles suffered 
 martyrdom. Nor did all the unbelieving Jews 
 perish in the overthrow of their capital. Yet 
 
16 
 
 it seems that entering into life is mentioned 
 as absolute security, and as the only adequate 
 security against being cast into hell or everlast- 
 ing lire, expressions here used interchangeably. 
 Upon the phrase, *• everlasting fire,"' sufficient 
 will be said in a subsequent lecture on the du^ 
 ration of future punishment. To that I must 
 refier for additional evidence,/that Gehenna is 
 the name of a [)lace of torment in the next 
 state. If my hearers should then be satis- 
 fied that everlastifig implies a proper eternity, 
 the controversy is settled. Endless fire can- 
 not be the name of any temporal calamity. 
 But the meaning is satisfactorily determined 
 without such corroboration, if to enter into 
 life denotes entering into heaven, or becoming 
 an heir of glory. For the passage under re- 
 view contains this sentiment; — If any objects 
 of aflfection or desire lead you into sin, re- 
 nounce them, for it is better for you to obtain 
 eternal hapoiness, having surrendered the 
 pleasures of this life, than to be cast into hell, 
 after having |)ossessed them. But the evi- 
 dence on tins subject is not yet exhausted. 
 Indeed, the following passage in tl'C tenth 
 chapter of Matthew, with the pjirallel one in 
 Luke, more clearly fixes the meaning than 
 
17 
 
 any T have yet cited. " And fear not them that 
 kill the body, but are "not able to kill the soul : 
 but rather fear liini, which is able to destroy 
 both soul and body in hell." Universalists 
 contend, that by the ^ow/ is here meant the vi- 
 tal principle. But if this is true, while hell 
 denotes no more than some temporal punish- 
 ment, we shall havetiie absurdest declaration 
 ever made by man, inspired or uninspired. 
 Fear not them that kill the body, that is, 
 destroy life, but are not able to kill the soul, 
 that is, to destroy the vital principle, but rather 
 fear him which is able to destroy both the 
 vital principle and the life, in the destruction 
 of Jerusalem, or by some other great temporal 
 calamity. Is this no absurdity ? Fear not 
 them that destroy the life, but are not able to 
 destroy the life, but rather fear him that is able 
 to destroy the life and the life in the destruction 
 of Jerusalem ! But in palliation of such gross 
 contradictions, it is said that the soul in the last 
 clause of the verse is pleonastic, so that the 
 body and the soul mean merely the vital prin- 
 ciple, or the life. That is poor aid, how^ever, 
 which brings no relief. If the soul means 
 the vital principle or the life, the absurdity 
 still remains, that the disciples are charged 
 3 
 
18 
 
 not to fear those who destroy the life, but are 
 not able to destroy the hfe, but rather to fear 
 him, who is able to destroy the life in some 
 great temporal calamity. All these difficul- 
 ties are removed by supposing, what is true, 
 that the soul means the immortai part of man, 
 a sense which it often bears. \\ e shall then 
 have this consistent and impressive sense. 
 Fear not them, which destroy the life but are 
 not able to destroy the immortal spirit, but 
 rather fear him who is able to destroy, or to 
 make wretched, both the body and the im- 
 mortal spirit, in hell. The destruction oftlie 
 body with the soul, is implied in the doctrine 
 of the resurrection. This interpretation being 
 admitted, as it must be. it follows irresistibly, 
 that gehenna is a place of punishment in a fu- 
 ture state , for it denotes something that can 
 be superadded to the loss of life, or death of 
 the body. Hie passage in Luke, to which 
 reference was just now made, is, if possible, 
 still more decisive. *•' And 1 say unto you, my 
 friends, be not afraid of them that kill the 
 body, and after that have no more that they can 
 do; but 1 will forewarn you whom ye shall 
 fear : feal* him, which after he hath killed, hath 
 power to cajst into hell : yea, 1 say unto you, 
 
19 
 
 fear him." The obvious conclusion is, that 
 trehenna denotes a punishment to be inflicted 
 after the calamities of this life are passed. 
 *• Fear him, which after he hath killed, hath 
 power to cast into hell." To God belongs 
 the prerogative of punishing the dead. In 
 this respect his power is peculiar. Human 
 rage is an object of dread only in this life. 
 Men can destroy the body, but they cannot 
 destroy the soul. Human and divine power 
 ■•re here put in contrast, the whole force of 
 which consists in the meaning of gehenna. 
 If it is not a place of torment in the future 
 'state; man, who can take the life, is as much 
 an object of dread, as God. This view is 
 corroborated, by the manner in which gehen- 
 na is introduced in the ninth chapter of Mark) 
 where it occurs in three successive passages, 
 " And whosoever shall oflend one of these 
 little ones, that believe in me, it is better for 
 hiru that a millstone were hanged about his 
 neck, and he were cast into the sea. And 
 if thy hand offend thee, cut it off; it is better 
 for thee to enter into life maimed than having 
 two hands to go into hell, into the fire that 
 never shall be quenched." To go into hel), 
 is here represented to be an evil greater than 
 
20 
 
 death. In the third chapter of James, gehen- 
 na is used for the wicked confined in it, in 
 the same manner that the names of countries 
 are used for their inhabitants or rulers. •' And 
 the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity; so is 
 the tongue among our members, that it defileth 
 the whole body, and setteth on fire the course 
 of nature, and it is set on fire of hell;' that is. 
 by Satan and his army of subordinate demons. 
 The apostle, therefore, with great force and 
 propriety, exhorts his readers to resist the 
 devil. He assures them that the wisdom of 
 wicked men, is not from above, that it is earth- 
 ly, sensual, devilish. He makes no such re- 
 marks of the valley of Hinnom, for it would be 
 folly, to attribute unlawful excitements and 
 sinful actions to the influence of such a place. 
 In describng the abominations which proceed 
 from the tongue, it might be natural to draw 
 an illustration from the most odious spot, 
 with which the Jews were acquainted ; but 
 this was not the apostle's object. He was 
 speaking of the ungovernable nature of the 
 tongue and not aiming to define the exact 
 enormitij of its sins. It is set on fire by hell, 
 not by the valley of Hinnom, but by the powers 
 of evil. They alone possess both the ability 
 and disposition to inflame and corrupt. Those 
 
21 
 
 who deny the existence of such beings, must 
 ^otill admit, that the force of the figure depends 
 on their supposed agency. That the tongue 
 is uiflamed and actuated by the principles of 
 wicked beings, imaginary or real, whose abode 
 is hell, is the only supposition, which affords 
 the declaration of St. James a suitable and 
 impressive sense. This is the tenth in- 
 stance, in which gehenna has fallen under our 
 examination, in nine of which, it can mean 
 only a place of torment in the future state. 
 In the other case, it admits this meaning, and 
 when viewed in connexion with the con- 
 text, requires it. In the two remaining passa- 
 ges where it occurs, both of which are in the 
 twenty-third chapter of St. xMatthew, it most 
 probably has the same import. '- Wo unto 
 you. Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye 
 compass sea and land to make one proselyte, 
 and when he is made, ye make him two-fold 
 more the child of hell (or two-fold more wick- 
 ed) than yourselves.*" He soon becomes doubly 
 deserving of the punishment of hell. In the 
 the same discourse it is added;* "Ye ser- 
 
 * Perhaps Christ borrows m this chapter, the language ori- 
 ginally descripUve or his final coming and of the future con- 
 deranation o the wicked, and applies it metaphorically to the ap- 
 proaciiing destruction of Jerusalem. 
 
 3* 
 
22 
 
 pents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye 
 escape the damnation of hell ?" All this, it is 
 said, was to come upon that generation. And 
 no doubt it did. Sufficient proof is given in 
 the interrogative affirmation ; "How can ye 
 escape the damnation of hell?" It at least 
 implies, that some powerful obstacle opposed 
 their escape. But from the destruction of 
 Jerusalem, many were delivered. Some of 
 them, it is to be presumed, did not live to wit- 
 ness that catastrophe, some were doubtless 
 in distant parts of the world, and some proba- 
 bly escaped from the very flames of the city. 
 These difficulties are removed by supposing, 
 that Christ had reference to the condemna- 
 tion consequent upon the destruction of Jeru- 
 salem — alluding to that event, only as a pre- 
 lude to what the unbelieving Jews would suf- 
 fer. This supposition is the more probable, 
 because the Scribes and Pharisees are said to 
 have incurred, by their peculiar injustice and 
 hypocrisy a severer condemnation. *^ Wo 
 unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! 
 for ye devour widow's houses, and for a pre- 
 tence make long prayers; therefore, ye shall 
 receive the greater damnation." But this 
 is not true, if the damnation Jicrc mentioned. 
 
23 
 
 and which the context shows is the same as 
 the damnation of hell, means only the calami- 
 ties which were about to happen to the Jewish 
 nation. For in those events, the Pharisees 
 suffered only in common with other citizens, 
 not more severely, nor in exact proportion to 
 their crimes. But it is not essential, that the 
 sense of gehenna should be positively ascer- 
 tained, m these two instances independently 
 considered. It always may mean a place of 
 suffering in the future state, and this in most 
 cases, is demonstrably its sense. It is origi- 
 nally the name of a valley near Jerusalem, 
 the only sense occurring in the Old Testament. 
 In the time of Christ, it had assumed a secon- 
 dary import, being transferred from its prima- 
 ry application, to denote a place in which it 
 was believed, the wicked are to be forever 
 tormented. This is the only metaphorical 
 sense, in which it appears to have been em- 
 ployed. By a careful examination, this seems 
 to be its universal meaning in the New Testa- 
 ment. We may therefore assert, that the 
 argument from this source in favor of future 
 punishment, is complete and unanswerable. 
 But my hearers may wish to learn, what ob- 
 jections are raised against so plain a conclu- 
 sion. 
 
24 
 
 1. It is said that gehenna cannot mean a 
 place of punishment in the future state, be- 
 cause it is not found in this sense in the Old 
 Testament. But admitting no such use of 
 the word occurs in the ancient scriptures, 
 does it follow that it is not used by Christ and 
 his disciples in this sense ? The New Testa- 
 ment was not commenced, until four Ivundred 
 years after the old was completed. During 
 this period, there was ample time for word^ to 
 assume new significations. Such changes 
 are common in all languages. No scholar is 
 unacquainted with this most familiar phe- 
 nomenon in the history of speech. If there- 
 fore, from an examination of the New Testa- 
 ment scriptures, gehenna is found to mean a 
 place of punishment in the future world, we 
 must not refuse our assent, if it has this signi- 
 fication no where else. But when we reflect, 
 that this was the popular use of the word 
 among the Jewish contemporaries of the 
 Messiah, and the sense which fair criticit^m 
 assigns it in the New Testament, it is extreme- 
 ly weak and impertinent, to say, that since it 
 had not this signification several hundred 
 years before, it never did receive it. Terms 
 in every language become obsolete, and new 
 
2r) 
 
 terms are substituted in their place, to express 
 an idea, which was held in r(;ninion by men 
 in different ages. In each successive genera- 
 tion, both written and oral language receives 
 modifications in sense, which in process of 
 time totally change it. Surely, if in the Old 
 Testament, future punishment is expressed in 
 other language, Christ might have applied this 
 new term in speaking of it. The Jews of that 
 day believed m a place of future punishment; 
 to this they applied the name gehenna. Their 
 belief was in this respect correct. When 
 speaking, therefore, on the same doctrine, 
 Christ would be apt to use the language ex- 
 pressive of it. with which they were familiar. 
 and about which there was no ambiguity. 
 The case is somewhat like that of a christian 
 missionary, who, in translating the Scriptures 
 into the language of a barbarous people, em- 
 ploys as a name of hell, not a new term, but 
 one w hich they had been accustomed to use 
 in speaking of the abode of the wicked. By 
 doing this he would tell them, that they had 
 not been mistaken in believing in such a 
 place, that it is a doctrine of Christianity as 
 well as of Paganism; and he w^ould leave them 
 to learn from other sources the difference be- 
 
2G 
 
 tween the doctrine, as taught in the bible and 
 as it stands in their fables. So our Lord, by 
 using gehenna in this sense, teaches his disci- 
 ples that the comnnon opinion in respect to 
 future rewards and punishnnents, is true, while 
 he also admits the propriety of the name. This 
 is o'nvious and rational. Nor in saying it, do 
 we rely at all on the opinions of Zoroaster, 
 of the unbelieving Jews, or of the authors 
 of the Apocrypha or of the Talmud. In 
 proof of the doctrine of future punishment, 
 we say, that such was the faith, correct or in- 
 correct, of the Jews in the time of our Lord, 
 and that gehenna was used as the name of the 
 place of torment; whence we have a satisfac- 
 tory reason for Clirist's using it as he did. 
 He did not teach the doctrine, because any 
 fallible men had received it. It is a part of 
 his own religion, a truth common to Chris- 
 tianity and to nearly all the religions of men. 
 Gehenna was a word in use, as a name of the 
 place of torment, and in this sense we have 
 seen he employs it. 
 
 2. But it is further said, that the doctrine of 
 future punishment is not taught in the Old 
 Testament, in any language whatever. The 
 assertion however is not true. Tlio doctrines, 
 
not only this but others, are taught loss c.\:- 
 plicitly in the Old Testament than in the 
 New; but still, future punishment is taught 
 even there. So at least thought the writers 
 of the Talmud, who abundantly teach it. And 
 what is the import of such language as this? 
 " The wicked shall be turned into hell and 
 all the nations that forget God." If it means 
 no more than that the wicked shall be turned 
 into ihegr^ave, they might retort ; tlie righteous 
 shall be turned into hell and all the nations 
 that remember God. But should it be ad- 
 mitted, that future punishment is not taught in 
 the Old Testament, does it follow that it can- 
 not be taught in the New ? Admirable powers 
 of logic ! Of what value is the New Testa- 
 ment, if nothing can be beheved, unless first 
 taught in more ancient scriptures. Accord- 
 cording to the principles of the objector, the 
 plainest and most important doctrines of 
 Christ, are not to be believed or may be easily 
 controverted, because they are either not men- 
 tioned or only obscurely hinted at, in the Old 
 Testament. Unbelievers have only to raise 
 doubts in respect to these hints, and their task 
 will be accomplished. The plainest asser- 
 tions of the New Testament, must be rejected 
 
28 
 
 as unintelligible, or as allusions to Pagan er- 
 rors, or as mis-translations of the original 
 sense. It is however demonstrably ceriain, 
 that the doctrine of future punishment is re- 
 vealed in the Old Testament. This objection 
 is also inc:on»patible with the preceding. 
 Christ could not have obtained, from the 
 Old Testament, a name applied to the 
 place of torment, if future punishment is not 
 there revealed. A new doctrine requires a 
 new term, or one employed in a new sense. 
 3. There are but two other considerations, 
 which can, with any plausibility, be urged 
 against the result of the foregoing examina- 
 tions. Nor are they of much force. They 
 only need to be noticed, because they are often 
 and imposingly advanced. In the instances 
 in which geheruia is undeniably used, in the 
 sense of a place of torment in the future 
 state, it is found in discourses addressed to 
 the disciples of our l^ord, and not to the un- 
 believing Jews, who were most exposed. 
 Whereas, in modern times, impenitent sinners 
 and not Christians, arc addressed with these 
 terrible denunciations. The maimer of our 
 Savior, it is said, indicates, that the disciples 
 were more exposed to gehenna than other 
 
29 
 
 Mien. In reply, it may be demanderl, why he 
 did not warn unbehevers, rather than his disci- 
 ples, provided gehenna denotes the approach- 
 ing destruction of Jerusalem. For on this, as 
 well as on the other supposition, unbelievers 
 were in greater danger than his disciples. 
 When that event took place, the apostles were 
 scattered over the Roman empire, preaching 
 the gospel. But there is an adequate reason 
 for teaching his immediate followers, and 
 the future heralds of the cross, the doctrine of 
 future punishment. He was preparing them 
 for their work, by telling them in the ear, what 
 they were commanded to proclaim upon the 
 house-tops. In this, there was an important 
 use. while perhaps he knew, that warnings, ad- 
 dressed to the unbelieving Jews, would be en- 
 tirely lost. 
 
 4. The remaining objection is more plau- 
 sible, but equally futile. The disciples of 
 Christ never used gehenna. except in a sin- 
 gle instance, in their epistles to the churches. 
 He commanded them, to proclaim his instruc- 
 tions upon the house-tops, but they do not 
 mention a place of torment, under this name. 
 To which it maybe replied; — -By writing 
 and circulating the gospels, containing the 
 4 
 
30 
 
 history of our Lord, and of his most private 
 instructions, they did proclaim to the world, 
 what they were taui^ht in secret." The ob- 
 jector overlooks this circumstance. He 
 seems to suppose, that the disciples never dis- 
 charged the commission, to proclaim upon the 
 house-tops, what they had heard in the ear, if 
 future punishment is not taught in their epis- 
 tles and in the very language of his discourses. 
 But they did discharge it, by writing and cir- 
 culating the gospels. Nor do we know, what 
 was the ordinary style of apostolic preaching. 
 We have only a few examples given in the acts 
 of the apostles, and in them we find evident 
 traces of the doctrine of future punishment. 
 As in the reply of Peter to the interrogation of 
 the vast multitude, assembled on the day of 
 Pentecost, — '• Men and brethren what shall we 
 do.'*" He understands them to inquire, what 
 they shall do for the remission of their sins, 
 and directs them to repent. Their sense of 
 guilt and exposure, could not certainly have 
 resulted from an apprehension of temporal 
 evils. Their crime had exposed them to none. 
 The same may be inferred from PauPs address 
 to Felix ; — '^ As he reasoned of righteousness. 
 temperance and judgment to come, Felix trem- 
 
31 
 
 bled." It was not the fear ofany present dan- 
 ger, that made tills hardened man tremble be- 
 fore a preacher of the cross. And probably, in 
 all their oral instructions, the doctrine of future 
 punishment held a sufficiently conspicuous 
 place. But in the brief history, which we have 
 of their first labors, and in their epistles, written 
 for the sake of exposing certain errors, cor- 
 recting certain abuses, and elucidating and 
 enforcing the abstruser doctrines of religion, . 
 it was not to be expected, that the first and 
 plainest truth of Christianity, should be formal- 
 ly stated and proved, it was every where 
 taken for granted by them. Most of those, to 
 whom they wrote, were in possession of one 
 or more of the gospels. None of them doubt- 
 ed the doctrine of future punishment. I'here 
 Vv'as no call, therefore, for an epistle, designed 
 to refute the notion of universal salvation. Al- 
 most all the epistles, are WTitten upon general 
 questions, the decision of which does not ne-* 
 cessarily require any allusion to the retribu- 
 tions of another world. Would it be strange, 
 if, in writing a letter to a friend on church gov- 
 ernment, you should say nothing of the resur- 
 rection of the body.-^ if in such a letter, you 
 should say nothing on- the subject of future 
 
32 
 
 punishment, would it be right for your friend 
 to infer, that you are an universahst ? Yet this 
 is the reasoning of those, who say, that Paul 
 was an universahst, because, when writing on 
 other subjects, he has not quoted St. Matthew 
 on future punishment! But though the na- 
 ture of the case did not require, that this sub- 
 ject should be designedly treated of, in por- 
 tions of the New Testament devoted to other 
 topics, yet it will hereafter be made to appear, 
 that the apostles recognize future punishment, 
 as a doctrine 'of Christianity. Should it again 
 be asked, why they did not use tiie name ge- 
 henna, when speaking of future punishment, 
 the answer is evident. If our Savior taught 
 the doctrine at all, he did it almost constantly 
 and in a great variety of forms, while he uses 
 gehenna in only four or five of his discourses. 
 When this is considered, tlic single instance 
 in which it is used by James, seems to afford 
 it a fair share of notice, especially since most 
 of tlie first readers of the epistles, were not «» 
 Jews but Gentiles, to whom other designations j 
 of the place of future punishment were more 
 familiar. Thus it appears, that no objection 
 exists to the conclusion, established in tlii^ 
 discourse. 
 
33 
 
 1 have now closed this oiithne of the argu- 
 ment, in favor of future punishment, from the 
 use of gehenna in the New Testament. The 
 ohvious inference is, that some men will be 
 miserable after death. The existence of 
 heaven, is sufficient proof of its being the resi- 
 dence of happy spirits. An analogous con- 
 clusion is drawn from the existence of a place* 
 of punishment. It is inhabited. Indeed, so 
 long as it is acknowledged, that faith in Christ 
 is the only security against destruction in hell, 
 it cannot be questioned, that many are involv- 
 ed in it. It cannot be believed, that all the 
 dead chose to serve God in their life time, at 
 the hazard of losing the dearest earthly ob- 
 jects. This is not the case with all the living, 
 even in this enlightened and religious age. 
 How many, as far as the eye can follow them, 
 even to the verge of eternity, bear the marks 
 of the most decided impiety! But this point 
 need not be argued. There is a hell, in which 
 li^ incorrigible sinners are punished. 
 
 4* 
 
LECTURE 11. 
 
 THE CERTAINTY OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT FROM 
 THE USE OF HADES. 
 
 Luke xvi. 23. 
 
 And in he//, he /if ted up his eyes, being in torments. 
 
 The Greek poets divide Hades into two 
 apartments, one of which they call Tartarus, 
 where the wicked dwell in great degradation 
 and misery, the other E/ysium. the delightful 
 residence of the righteous. The latter Jews, 
 many of whom were better acquainted with 
 the Greek than with the Hebrew language, 
 adopted the same meaning, with only slight 
 modifications. They supposed hades to be a 
 vast subterranean receptacle, in which the 
 souls of men exist in a separate state, until 
 the resurrection of their bodies. According 
 to them, the region of the blessed, called 
 paradise in allusion to their own scriptures, is 
 in the upper part of this receptacle ; while be- 
 
neath is the abyss, m which the souls of the 
 wicked are subjected to punishment. Thus 
 it appears, they sometimes used it in a more 
 extensive sense than they attached to gehenna, 
 which denotes only the place of torment, or 
 that part of hades where the wicked are con- 
 fined. That these are the views, which the 
 contemporaries of Christ, both Jews and Gen- 
 tiles, entertained, no one disputes. In the 
 New Testament, the same signification pre- 
 vails. But hades does not always include 
 both apartments or divisions of the receptacle. 
 It most frequently denotes, either the place of 
 torment or paradise, and not ordinarily both 
 at once. The reason of this, is, that persons, 
 who are mentioned, as dwelling or destined to 
 dwell there, are decidedly fitted for the region 
 of the blessed, or for the abyss of woe, and 
 cannot be spoken of as inhabiting both. When 
 the wicked are said to descend to hades, 
 that part of it is intended, which is called by 
 the Greeks tartarus, and by the Hebrews ge- 
 henna; but when the righteous descend 
 thither, it is to elysium or paradise. Thus, 
 on one occasion, it is said in reference to 
 Christ, that his soul was not lefi: in hades ; and 
 on another, that the rich man also died, and in 
 
hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torments. 
 Both declarations are true. Christ and the 
 rich man descended to hades, but not to the 
 same apartment; one went to paradise with 
 the penitent thief, the other went to be tor- 
 mented in gehenna. Lazarus was carried by 
 angels to Abraham's bosom, another name of 
 the region of bliss, while the angels, who kept 
 not their first estate, were cast down to tar- 
 tarus, that part of hades in which the wicked 
 are tormented. 
 
 It seems, on the authority of these facts, 
 that an invincible argument, in favor of future 
 punishment, may be drawn from the use of ha- 
 des. But it is objected, that it most common- 
 ly means the grave, and that, when it will not 
 bear this signification, it is not demonstrably 
 a place of torment. Such assertions are easi- 
 ly made, and greedily credited by multitudes, 
 which renders it necessary to notice all the 
 passages, in which the word occurs. We 
 first meet with it, in the eleventh chapter of 
 Matthew. '^ And thou Capernaum, which art 
 exalted unto heaven, shah be brought down to 
 hell." This is repeated in Luke ; — - And thou, 
 Capernaum, whicli art exahed to heaven, shalt 
 be thrust down to hell." lu tiiese places, 
 
37 
 
 hades is probably used for that part, where 
 lost men are tormented. On this supposition, 
 the dechiration of Christ to the inhabitants of 
 Capernaum, is this ; — Your privileges have been 
 great. I have given you^ every suitable evidence 
 of my divine mission^ but you have rejected me. 
 Your trial is now completed. You must be thrust 
 down to hell. But this is not certainly his 
 meaning. In speaking of their privileges and 
 prosperity, he compares them in their exalta- 
 tion to heaven ; in speaking, therefore, of their 
 impending calamities and ruin as a city, he 
 might aptly compare the extent of their fall 
 with the world of departed spirits, which, ac- 
 cording to Jewish notions, is the lowest imagi- 
 nable place. But on this supposition, the 
 strength and liveliness of the figure, depends 
 upon the primary and proper meaning of ha- 
 des. Our Lord tells them, you are exalted 
 very high, even to heaven, but you shall be 
 thrust down very low, even to hades. The 
 grave cannot be intended. In the sixteenth 
 chapter of Matthew, the word again occurs. 
 "I say also unto thee, that thou art Peter; 
 and upon this rock, I will build my church, 
 and the gates o^ hades shall not prevail agiinst 
 it." Here, it is used for Satan and his subor- 
 
38 
 
 dinate demons, the inhabitants of tartarus. 
 Glirist promises, that the powers of evil shall 
 not destroy his church. Were hades the 
 grave, the fiirure would have neither force nor 
 beauty. It is obvious, without a declaration, 
 that the grave cannot undermine Christianity. 
 It is quite absurd, to charge it with such an in- 
 tention. But the world of wicked spirits, 
 used, by a common figure, for its inhabitants, 
 is a most malignant and powerful adversary 
 to the cause of truth. The next passage, 
 which we notice, is in the fifteenth chapter of 
 the first epistle to the Corinthians. " Oh death 
 where is thy sting? Oh grave (oh hades) 
 where is thy victory ?" The apostle is speak- 
 ing of the resurrection. He mentions Christ, 
 as the author. What, then, is imphed in the 
 resurrection, or over what powers does Christ 
 triumph in accomplishing that event ? He 
 resuscitates the body, which is held in the 
 chains of death, and recalls the soul from the 
 receptacle of the dead, to re-unite it to the 
 body. These are the powers, alluded to in the 
 text; — ^^ Oh death, where is tiiy sting? Oh 
 hades, wiiere is thy victory ?" The passage, 
 therefore, is incumbered with no ditliculty, on 
 assigning to hades, the meaning which it bore 
 
3^ 
 
 in Greek linage. This interpretation, how- 
 ever, is not the one, which appears most satis- 
 factory. The apostle probably did not intend 
 to convey, more than one idea by the expres- 
 sions ; — " Oh death where is thy sting, Oh 
 grave where is thy victory?" After having 
 explained the glorious resurrection, which 
 Christ has procured for his followers, he tri- 
 umphantly inquires, where is the victory of sin, 
 or of the powers arrayed against the chris- 
 tian? He declares, that the sting of death. 
 or that, which renders death terrible, is sin. 
 Over this, Christ has completely triumphed. 
 By obtaining, for his disciples, an inheritance 
 in heaven, of which their resurrection is the 
 first fruits, he has disappointed sin, and de- 
 prived it of its prey. This explanation attaches 
 to death and hades, the same sense, and sup- 
 poses, that they are put by metonymy, for the 
 authors of death, or for satan and his angels, 
 the inhabitants of hades. Besides the passa- 
 ges already alluded to, in which the word oc- 
 curs, we find it four times in the Apocalypse of 
 St. John ; — •' I am he that liveth and w^as dead ; 
 and behold I am alive forevermore, Amen ; and 
 have the keys o( hades diud of death.*' Keys are 
 an emblem of power. Christ asserts his autho- 
 
40 
 
 rity, not over death and the grave, for that 
 would be mere tautology, but over death and 
 all those, who have passed into the unseen 
 state. It is not used in this place, in a sense 
 which is inconsistent with its having, for a 
 primary and literal meaning, the mansion 
 or world of the dead. " And I looked and 
 behold a pale horse, and his name that sat on 
 him was death : and hades followed with him.'' 
 Death on a pale horse, is an emblem of a de- 
 structive pestilence. But it is not so easy, to 
 determine the signification of hades. It pro- 
 bably means, that vast multitudes became vic- 
 tims of the disease, or were drawn down to 
 the mansions of the dead. This is a sense, 
 which suits the passage, and which renders it 
 altogether unnecessary, to apply to hades a 
 different meaning from that, which it ordinarily 
 bears. " And I saw the dead, small and great, 
 stand before God : and the books were open- 
 ed : and another book was opeued, which 
 is the book of life, and the dead were judged 
 out of those things, which were written in the 
 books, according to their works. And the sea 
 gave up the dead, which were in it; and dcatli 
 and hades delivered up the dead, which were in 
 them: and they were judged every.man accord- 
 
41 
 
 iiig to their works." This is an account of the 
 last judgment. 1 lie dead all appeared before 
 the tribunal of Christ. The sea and death and 
 hades gave up the dead which were in them. 
 This is a familiar mode of expressing a general 
 resurrection. All who had suffered death 
 from any cause whatever, appeared before the 
 judgment seat, •* And they were judged every 
 man according to their works. ' By this it is 
 not determined, whether hades means the 
 mansion of the dead, or simply the grave. It 
 is only affirmed, that there was a general 
 resurrection of men, whether they had perish- 
 ed in the sea or by disease, or in some other 
 form But it is immediately added, that death 
 and hades were cast into the lake of fire. This, 
 it has been supposed means, that no death 
 shall occur after the judgment day. Such an 
 interpretation, however, poorly accords with 
 the succeeding declaration. — '* This is the se- 
 cond death." For if casting death and hades 
 into the lake of fire only denotes, that those 
 who had once been victims of them, shall 
 never be again, there is no propriety in call- 
 ing it the second death. Another interpreta- 
 tion is much better. Death is put for the au- 
 thors of death, and hades, for the inhabitants 
 5 
 
4ii 
 
 of tartarus, for Satan and all the enemies of 
 Christ. The authors of death and the pow- 
 ers of darkness are thus represented as cast 
 into the lake of lire. " This is the second 
 death."* 
 
 All the passages in which hades occurs in 
 the New Testament have now been noticed. 
 In every instance it has reference, more or less 
 direct, to the mansions of the dead. In cases 
 where it is used figuratively, the force of the 
 language depends upon this literal and prima- 
 ry sense. But in this examination, the most 
 important paragraph in which it is found, re- 
 quires more consideration. I refer to tl e 
 parable of the rich man and Lazarus in the 
 sixteenth chapter of Luke. The Pharisees 
 had overheard a discourse in which Christ 
 had taught his disciples the impossibility of 
 serving God and mammon; and being cove- 
 tous, they derided him. In illustration of 
 what he had said he tells them, — '^ There was 
 a certain rich man, which was clothed in pur- 
 ple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously 
 everyday: and there was a certain beggar 
 named Lazarus which was laid at his gate, 
 
 =* See Eichhorn on Revelationp. 
 
43 
 
 iull of sores, and desiring to be fed with the 
 crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: 
 moreover, the dogs came and licked his 
 sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar 
 died, and was carried by angels into Abra- 
 ham's bosom. The rich man also died, and 
 was buried: And in hell he lifted up his eyes, 
 being in torments, and seeth AbrahauLafar 
 off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried, 
 and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me 
 and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of 
 his finger in water, and cool my tongue : for I 
 am tormented in this flame." By this he 
 teaches them, what is the consequence of rely- 
 ing upon riches. Men who serve wealth, or 
 seek their supreme good in it, cannot serve 
 God. The consequence is, that after death, 
 they will be sent into a place of misery; 
 while many of the poor, who were not un'er 
 such a temptation, will be admitted to a hap- 
 py life. Whether Dives and Lazarus are ficti- 
 tious persons or not, is immaterial, in deciding 
 the sense which the sacred writers have at- 
 tached to hades. No hypercriticism has ever 
 been able to explain this parable, so as to 
 weaken the evidence which it affords in favor of 
 future punishment. In accordance with thi^ 
 
44 
 
 undeniable example, hades may be translated 
 the abode of the dead, except in a few passa- 
 ges where it is used figuratively, and in evi- 
 dent allusion to this sense. In confirmation 
 of this, I would refer to an additional source of 
 evidence. The sacred writers employ, in the 
 place of hades, a word which they considered 
 precisely synonymous. In our version, it is 
 rendered, the deep^ the pit^ the bottomless piL 
 It occurs in the tenth chapter of Romans. 
 " But the righteousness which is of faith, 
 speaketh on this wise : say not in thine heart, 
 who shall ascend into heaven ? that is, to bring 
 Christ down from above : or, who shall de- 
 scend into the deep? that is, to bring Christ 
 up again from the dead?" When the Jews 
 wished to describe anything as above human 
 power, they compared it with the impossibili- 
 ty of ascending into heaven, or of descending 
 into the deep, the receptacle of the dead. 
 The apostle declares, that no such impossi- 
 bility attends salvation by faith. St. Luke 
 also informs us, that a legion of devils besought 
 Christ not to conmiand them to go into the 
 deep. Tlie word occurs repeatedly in Revela- 
 tions. '^ And the fifth angel sounded, and 1 
 .«aw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: 
 
4, J 
 
 and to him was given the key of the bottom- 
 less pit. Aiid he opened tlie bottomless pit; 
 and there arose a smoke out of the pit^ as the 
 smoke of a great furnace." The passages, 
 therefore, in which this name is found, may be 
 employed ia the argument, in connexion with 
 those in which hades is the term of designa- 
 tion. 
 
 There is no reply, which can be made to the 
 conclusion, at which we have arrived, unless it 
 is, that hades in the version of the Seventy, 
 and the corresponding word in the Hebrew 
 bible, never mean the world of departed spirits. 
 That such an objection is unfounded, the fol- 
 lowing passages from the Old Testament 
 clearly show. " Hades from beneath is mov- 
 ed for thee, to meet thee at thy coming. It 
 stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief 
 ones of the earth : it hath raised up from their 
 thrones all the kings of the earth." This is the 
 song of triumph on the fall of the king of Baby- 
 lon. It represents the dead as assembled in one 
 place, and all the kings of the earth as rising 
 up to meet the tyrant. We have instances 
 too of the opposition, in which heaven for 
 height, and hades for depth, were conceived to 
 stand to each other, which is entirely incon- 
 
4(5 
 
 sistent with the opinion, that the word in the 
 Old Testament always denotes the grave. 
 "Canst thcLi by searching find out God? 
 Canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfec- 
 tion? It is high as heaven, what canst thou 
 do? deeper than hades; what canst thou 
 know ?" Surely they might have looked into 
 the grave. " If I ascend up into heaven, thou 
 art there: If I make ray bed in hades, behold 
 thou art there." '' Though they dig into ha- 
 des, thence will my hand take them : though 
 they climb up to heaven, thence will I bring 
 them down." " A fire is kindled in mine an- 
 ger, and shall burn to the lowest hades." The 
 force of the figure depends upon hades being 
 the lowest conceivable place, or a very low 
 place in the earth, where both Jews and Greeks 
 vsupposed the mansion of the dead to be situ- 
 ated. To check the presumption of Job, God 
 inquires of him; — '^ Have the gates of death 
 been opened unto thee, or hast thou seen the 
 doors of the shadow of hades .^" Tins chal- 
 lenge shows, that the grave, the doors ol u hich 
 are accessible to men, is not the subject of 
 discourse. "The wicked shall be turned into 
 hades\> and all the nations that ibrget God." 
 Not onlv the wicked but the righteous are 
 
turned into the grave, yet both do not descend 
 to hell. But were hades used in the Old 
 Testament for the place of departed spirits, 
 there would be no valid argument against 
 its having this sense in the New. We find it in 
 the writings of the Apostles. We ask its 
 meaning. The abettor of universal salvation 
 replies, that in the Old Testament it always 
 denotes the grave. But on reading the gospels, 
 we discover, that persons live and act in it. If 
 therefore it means the grave in the Hebrew 
 scriptures, it must have another signification, 
 which will suit the descriptions given of it 
 in the New Testament. There, in several 
 instances at least, it obviously means the 
 mansion of the dead. It is consequently 
 trifling with our understandings, to say, that 
 it sometimes signifies the grave, which may 
 be true, while it sometimes means a place of 
 punishment beyond the grave. 
 
 This investigation in my own judgment es- 
 tablishes the conclusion of the last lectiu-e. 
 that some men will be subjected to punish- 
 ment in the future state. In the pursuit of 
 this truth, its solemn and motnentous import 
 has not escaped my mind. Though the sub- 
 ject has demanded the undivided and unim- 
 
48 
 
 passioned mind of tlie critic, yet the tboueht 
 has not failrd to arise as those passages, w h'ch 
 disclose the fates of men, have passed in re- 
 view, that you and I are travelling to eternity, 
 and that we are personally concerned in the 
 awful fact which has been unfolded. The 
 reflection is not easily eluded, that the privi- 
 leges which we enjoy may be abused and in- 
 volve us in deeper misery. Capernaum once 
 exalted to heaven, is now thrust down to hell. 
 They who despised Moses' law died without 
 mercy ; of how much sorer punishment shall 
 he be thought worthy, who rejects the gospel ? 
 The man who was clothed in purple and fine 
 hnen and fared sumptuously every day, has 
 closed his career of pride and luxury, and in 
 hell he lifts up his eyes being in torments. 
 Perhaps one of my own beloved congregation 
 is ripening for such a fate. Perhaps he is 
 guilty of covetousness that gross idolatry; 
 perhaps he is fascinated by pleasure ; perhaps 
 he is held by some great but worldly ambition ; 
 perhaps he is bewildered by error; perhaps 
 some iron-handed vice is subduing him to the 
 dominion of satan ; perhaps, if no other foe 
 assails him, stupidity and procrastination are 
 hurrying his soul into the pit. This possibili- 
 
49 
 
 ty IS a solemn and overwhelming truth. 
 Painful as the admission is. it cannot he with- 
 held. To deny it would suhserve no valucible 
 purpose, but would involve me, in the con- 
 demnation of a false witness, and you in the 
 anguish of disappointment. God has given 
 us this life, in which to prepare for the next. 
 What folly then is superior to his, who bends 
 all his efforts to the desires of this world, who 
 bounds his vision by the limits of time ? Will 
 it avail any thing in the day of Jesus Christ, 
 that he refused instruction and despised re- 
 proof? that he listened not to the monitions 
 of the spirit and word of God, nor to the 
 appeals of conscience, nor to tlie preaching of 
 the cross ? And w^ho will be able to screen the 
 naked spirit of that false ambassador of 
 Christ, who fearful of giving momentary pain 
 or of incurring the hatred of men. allows his 
 hearers to be ignorant of their exposure or in- 
 sensible of it? The awful truth, that nothing 
 will protect the unfaithful, should never be 
 forgotten. A little while hence, an account 
 of my stewardship will be demanded. Then 
 at the tribunal of Jesus Christ, we must stand 
 together. The books will be opened and out 
 of them we shall be judged. Among other 
 thmgs there recorded, is the history of my 
 
50 
 
 ministry ! Do not then demand of me a mode 
 of preaching, which suits the carnal mind. 
 There too, are your lives with every thought, 
 word and action, distinctly traced ! Then de- 
 mand not, that I should feed your hopes of 
 impunity in sin, and lull you into a false secu- 
 rity. Remember, another book will be open- 
 ed, which is the book of hfe, and whosoever 
 is not found written therein will be cast into 
 the lake of fire. Let not this assembly break 
 up without solemnly inquiring, where and 
 with whom you will soon assemble. Where ? 
 Not in a world of probation. With whom.'* 
 Not in a mixed company of christians and un- 
 believers. But you will either rise to the frui- 
 tion of heavenly society and occupations, or 
 descend into the abyss with satan and his an- 
 gels. Inquire, to which of these states are 
 your characters most suited. How would the 
 all engrossing question be decided, were you 
 now to die? In what place would you ap- 
 pear, in Paradise or in Gehenna ? Does con- 
 science decide against you? Oh my hearer, 
 remember the Lamb of God, which taketh 
 away the sins of the world ! Trust in him, 
 and then you may triumi)!iantly exclaim : Qiji 
 death, where is thy sting? Oh^ Imdes^ where 
 is thy victory ? 
 
LECTURE III. 
 
 THE CERTAINTY OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT FRO^f 
 AliSsCELLANLOLS PAbfcjAGEcJ. 
 
 Matthew vii, 13, 14. 
 
 Enter ye in at the strait gate ; for %vide is the 
 gate^ and broad is the way that leadeth to de- 
 struction^ and many there he ivhich go in 
 thereat : because strait is the gate, and nar- 
 rotv is the tvay, which leadeth unto life, and 
 few there be that find it. 
 
 In pursuing the subject of the preceding 
 lectures, it is important to call your attention 
 to various additional passages and forms of ex- 
 pression, in which the doctrine of future pun- 
 ishment is taught; since nothing is more 
 usual than to censnre ministers of the ^ospel, 
 for frequently speaking of a world, the name 
 of which is found only twenty-three times in 
 the New Testament. The text first sohcits 
 our notice. The life of which Christ here 
 speaks, is eterrml life or happiness in heaven. 
 
52 
 
 That this is the usual meaningof the word in 
 sucli connexions, has once been show n. •• W hat 
 good thing shall I do, that I may have eter- 
 7ial life'P '' If thou wilt enter into life, keep 
 the commandnnents." '-Then hatl) Ciod also 
 to ilie Gentiles, granted repentance unto /i/'e.''' 
 "I am tlie bread of life: be that cometh to 
 me, shall never thirst." '^Search the scrip- 
 tures ; for in th.em } e think ye have eternal life : 
 and they are they which testily of lue. And 
 ye will not come to me, that ye might have 
 life^ The text then declares, that on ac- 
 count of the difficulty of discovering the way to 
 heaven, many v\ alk in that which leads to de- 
 struction. Kternal life and destruction are op- 
 posed to each other, and denote different states 
 of existence; the one of unsullied character 
 and of unalloyed enjoyment — the other of 
 complete moral ruin and wretchedness. Such 
 a figurative use of ( lest nut ion is common in all 
 languages. It is frequent in the bible. ^vPride 
 goeth before destruction," not annihilation, 
 but the ruin of one's character and peace. 
 '^Oh Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself" 
 " Destroy not him with thy meat" '^ Punish- 
 ed with everlasting destruction." Agreeably 
 to this use, the words of Christ contain the 
 
following solemn exhort«ition. Enter in at 
 that strait gate, which leads to eternal Imppiness ; 
 for wide is the gate and broad is the way^ which 
 leads to the miseries of ttie wicked in hcU ; because 
 strait is the gate and narrow is the way which 
 leads to eternal happiness^ and few there be that 
 find it. The supposition that '• destruction'''' 
 denotes the calamities which were soon to 
 befall the Jewish nation, cannot be sustained. 
 The miseries spoken of are such as happen 
 to those, and those only, who enter not into 
 eternal happiness ; whereas, on the scheme 
 of universal salvation, those who perished ia 
 the destruction of Jerusalem found the way to 
 heaven, as truly as those who escaped. But 
 it is sometimes said, that life in the text means 
 the kiui^dbm of Christ, considered simply as 
 a te.-nporal kingdom; and that all who be- 
 came its subjects were to be saved from the de- 
 struction of Jerusalem, while those who would 
 not recognize the Messiah, were to perish. 
 Such is the disposition of men to reduce the 
 benefits of Christianity, to the melioration of 
 their temporal condition I This, the Jews 
 did — this universalists do now. We must 
 believe, according to these interpreters, 
 that the object of Christ's untiring admoni- 
 6 
 
54 
 
 tions and warnings, was to save a little band 
 of men from the flames of Jerusalem ! But 
 have they forgotten, what our Lord declares, 
 that if half the mighty works, which he did in 
 Capernaum, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, 
 they would have continued to this day ? Why 
 then did he not save these cities, rather than 
 Capernaum ? If his object was to deliver a few 
 persons from temporal calamities, his success 
 would have been much greater in the cities of 
 the plain. There, according to his own de- 
 claration, he would have produced a general 
 reformation, while in Jerusalem, he gained 
 only a few disciples. He might have reasons 
 for not entering on his mission to save the 
 world from spiritual evils, sooner than he 
 did; but if his object was to rescue a few 
 men from such a calamity as the destruction of 
 a city, the best opportunity was not selected. 
 He did not save Jerusalem, nor the great body 
 of its inhabitants, nor the other cities of Ju- 
 dea, where his works were performed; yet 
 he says, that had he appeared for the cities 
 of the plain, they would have repented and 
 continued prosperous. Universalists, liow- 
 ever, tell us, that all the terrible denunciations, 
 with which he closes most of his parables, and 
 
which he intersperses in all his instructions, 
 relfite to the approaching ruin of Jerusalem: 
 an i a:u3n<]^ the rest, we must believe, that the 
 text is of this description. There is, however, 
 not only an improbability on the face of i heir 
 assertion, but it is wholly unsustained. Life 
 no where means an enjoyment of the tem[)0- 
 ral privileges of the true church. To enter 
 into life, may denote entering into the king- 
 dom of God, when this last expression is used 
 for heaven, but in no other case. Though 
 enough has been said to establish the proof, 
 svliich the text affords, of future punishment, 
 yet I cannot forbear adverting to the unan- 
 swerable confirmation, furnished by an analo- 
 gous passage in the thirteenth chapter of St. 
 Luke. " Then said one unto him. Lord, are 
 there few that be saved?" What is the im- 
 port of this inquiry? saved from what? from 
 the destruction of Jerusalem? The answer 
 of Christ will determine. '^ And he said unto 
 them, strive to enter in at the strait gate ; for 
 many. I say unto you. will seek to enter in and 
 shall not be able. When once the master of 
 the house is risen up and hath shut to the 
 door, and ye begin to stand without and to 
 knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open 
 
5b 
 
 unto us; and he shall answer, I say unto you. 
 I know you not whence ye are : then shall ye 
 say ; we have eaten and drunk in thy presence 
 and thou hast taught in our streets. But he 
 shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye 
 are: depart from me all ye workers of iniqui- 
 ty. There shall be weeping and gnashing of 
 teeth, when ye shall see Abraham and Isaac 
 and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom 
 of God. and you yourselves thrust out.*' The 
 figure of shutting to the door, seems to refer 
 to the close of probation ; and the banish- 
 ment of the workers of iniquity, from the pre- 
 sence of Christ, when seeking for admission, is 
 utterly inexplicable, on any supposition, but 
 that of a final judgment. But what should set 
 the subject at rest, is the closing representa- 
 tion ; — '*And there shall be weeping and 
 gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham 
 and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of God, 
 and you yourselves thrust out.'' Tliis, as well 
 as the other facts here stated, has not yet 
 taken place, and can be fulfilled only at the 
 close of the world. Then, and not till then, 
 shall they " come from the east and from the 
 we t and from the north and from vhc south,** 
 out of all nations, ^' and sit down in the kino-- 
 
dom of God." This account must not only 
 be regarded, as an illustration of the views 
 which have been taken of the text, but also, 
 as -an independent proof of future punishment. 
 2. "• The Son of man shall send forth his 
 angels, and they shall gather out of his king- 
 do[n all things which offend and them that do 
 iniquity ; and shall cast them into the furnace 
 of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing 
 of teeth." This seems to be sufficiently ex- 
 plicit and intelligible, especially if we read in 
 connexion with it the following text. " So 
 shall it be at the end of the world ; the angels 
 shall come forth and sever the wicked from 
 among the just, and shall cast them into the 
 furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and 
 gnashing of teeth." This too, it is said, re- 
 lates to the destruction of Jerusalem, at which 
 time the Jews ceased to be a nation. But in 
 that event the declaration was not accom- 
 plished, that the wicked shall be separated 
 from the just, and that all things which offend 
 shall be gathered out of Christ's kingdom. 
 Not to say, that this is predicted to take place 
 
 Math. xiii. 41, 42, 49, 50, 
 
 6* 
 
58 
 
 at the end of the world, which it will be diffi- 
 cult to prove, means the end of the Jewish 
 state; it is obvious, that Christ has never yet 
 gathered out of his kingdom, all things which 
 offend and them which do iniquity. It should 
 also be noticed, that ^c/ie/ma and the furnace of 
 fire are synonymous expressions. 
 
 3. " Many shall come from the east and 
 west and shall sit down with Abraham, Isaac 
 and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. But the 
 children of the kingdom (the Jews who had 
 enjoyed the privileges of the kingdom of God 
 on earth) shall be cast into outer darkness: 
 there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." 
 The kingdom of heaven in this place, mani- 
 festly means the heavenly world. When 
 many of the Gentiles are admitted into it, in 
 company with the pious ancestors of the 
 Jews, they themselves are to be cast into 
 outer darkness, where they are to suffer the 
 most excruciating torments. The representa- 
 tion of men coming from all parts of the 
 earth, and entering hko the immediate socie- 
 ty of the patriarclis, while the unbelieving 
 children of the visible church are cast 
 
 Matli. viii. 11 12. 
 
59 
 
 into a dark and miserable place by themselves, 
 is not applicable to any events, which have 
 taken place in this world. In the fifth chap- 
 ter of St. John, the same fact is differently ex- 
 pressed. " Marvel not at this : for the hour 
 is coming, in the which all that are in the 
 graves shall hear his voice, and shall come 
 forth; they that have done good, unto the 
 resurrection of life; and they that have done 
 evil, unto the resurrection of damnation." 
 Punishment, is not only the sense ofdamjiafion. 
 most agreeable to common usage, but which 
 the construction of this sentence requires. 
 While some of the dead are raised to immor- 
 tal happiness, others will come forth to the 
 resurrection of damnation. They are not 
 annihilated, nor admitted to heaven, but are 
 condemned and punished. 
 
 4. At the same conclusion we arrive, by 
 examining that large class of passages, which 
 develope the principles on which the destinies 
 of men will be decided. '* But I say unto yoa, 
 that every idle word that men shall speak, 
 thev shall give account thereof, in the day of 
 judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be 
 
 Math. xii. 36, 37. 
 
bU 
 
 justified and by thy words thou shalt he con- 
 demned.'' This is applied to men generically, 
 to every generation, both of Jews and Gen- 
 tiles. "And his Lord was wroth, and deliver- 
 ed him to the tormentors, till he should pay all 
 that was due unto him. So likewise shall my 
 Heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from 
 your hearts forgive not every one, his brother 
 their trespasses." " For this we know, that 
 no unclean person, nor covetous man, who 
 is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the 
 kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man 
 deceive you with vain words^ for because of 
 these things cometh the wrath of God, upon the 
 children of disobedience." " Now the works 
 of the flesh are manifest, which are these ; 
 adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lascivious- 
 ness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, 
 emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 
 envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings and 
 such like ; of which I tell you before, as I 
 have also told you in time past, that tliey 
 which do such things shall not inherit the 
 kingdom of God." What it is, to inherit the 
 kingdom of God, we are informed in an ac- 
 
 Math. xviii. 34,-5. Eph. v. 5, 6. Gal. v. 19, 21. 
 
61 
 
 count of the last judgment. '* Conne ye bless- 
 ed of my Father, inherit tlie kingdom prepar- 
 ed for you from the foundation of the wor.d." 
 It is to possess the rewards of tlie righteous 
 in heaven. In the foregoing quotations, the 
 assertion is unequivocally made, that certain 
 sins unabandoned, will terminate in an exclu- 
 sion from the blessings of salvation. The argu- 
 ment, derived from them in favor of future pun- 
 ishment, is grounded upon the historical fact, 
 that many persons enter the grave, with the 
 characters described. It cannot be supposed, 
 that they who give no signs of repentance until 
 the very crisis of death, then invariably become 
 the subjects of so great a change; especially 
 when it is recollected, how many are suddenly 
 arrested in the midst of their crimes, and de- 
 stroyed without a moment's reflection. The 
 threatening against such persons must be exe- 
 cuted. Is not this an obvious conclusion from 
 the reiterated declaration, that sinners of every 
 description shall be excluded from heaven, 
 and visited with the wrath of God, when it is 
 known, that they often die, as they live, to every 
 good work reprobate ? "Then said Jesus 
 unto them, I go my way, and ye shall seek 
 me, and shall die in your sins : whither I go, 
 
62 
 
 ye cannot come." " I said therefore unto you. 
 that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe 
 not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.*' 
 •' Ye shall seek me, and shall not find me : and 
 where I am, thither ye canncjt come.'' These 
 passages, addressed to the unbelieving Jews, 
 are as decisive as any can be, in proof of fu- 
 ture punishment. They do not, indeed, at 
 first sight, wear this aspect. It is only by an 
 acquaintance with the nature of Christianity, 
 as a system for restoring man to the favor of 
 God through the forgiveness of sins, that we 
 see the force of the denunciation ; — '* Ye shall 
 die in your sins y Such a death is indissolu- 
 bly connected with punishment. Indeed, in 
 most of our Lord's addresses to the Jews, he 
 charges them with an opposition to himself, 
 fatal to their souls. '^ How can ye believe, 
 who receive honor one of another." '^ Whither 
 I go ye cannot come." The very circum- 
 stance, that faith in Christ is made essential 
 to salvation, connected with the final rejec- 
 tion of him by the Jews, is com[)lete demon- 
 stration of the doctrine of future punishment. 
 It does not show in what future punishment 
 
 John viii. 21, 24. vii. 34. 
 
63 
 
 consists. A knowledge of this, we must 
 gather from other sources. But it does show, 
 that some men will not inherit the kingdom of 
 Christ and of God. '' I pray for them: I pray 
 not for the world, but for them which thou 
 hast given me." " Neither pray I for these 
 alone; but for them also which shall believe 
 on me through their word." For tlie world, 
 (under that a[)pellation Christ includes all final 
 unbelievers) he does not pray : but only for 
 such as should afterward believe on his name, 
 implying that some men would reject him, in 
 consequence of which they must fail of salva- 
 tion. 
 
 5. " Woe unto you, Scribes and Phari- 
 sees, hypocrites ! for ye shut up the kingdom 
 of heaven against men : for ye neither go in 
 yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are 
 entering to go in." This is another of the 
 numerous proofs of the exclusion of persons 
 in the time of Christ, from the privileges of his 
 kingdom. Enough has been said of the 
 spiritual nature of this kingdom. It was not 
 set up with any temporal design, nor does it 
 secure its subjects from temporal calamities. 
 
 John xvii. 9, 20. Math, xxiii. 13. 
 
64 
 
 It is not of this world. It extends beyond the 
 grave, aiid [iiere, in a peculiar sense, it protects 
 and enriches those, who inherit it, while the 
 servants of sin, are banished and shut up in 
 misery. But the Pharisees entered not into 
 this kingdom, and were accessory to the ex- 
 clusion of others. Nothing more indubitable 
 is needed in proof of a state of punishment in 
 the future world. 
 
 6. " And whosoever shall not receive you, 
 nor hear you, when ye depart thence ; shake 
 offthe dust under your feet, for a testimony 
 against them. Verily I say unto you, it shall 
 be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah 
 in the day of judgment, than for that city." 
 This passage, which shows that the day of 
 judgment was used technically, for the time 
 when God shall pronounce a final sentence 
 on men of every generation, is of itself suffi- 
 cient to establish the future punishment of 
 the wicked. The inhabitants of Sodom and 
 Gomorrah are to be called to an account in 
 company with the rejectors of the gospel, 
 who will be most severely punished. " And 
 this is the condemnation, that light has come 
 into the world, and men loved darkness rath- 
 er than liglit, because their deeds are evil.'" 
 
 Mark vl 11. John iii, 19. 
 
G5 
 
 It was not the dcsif]rn of Christ's death, to 
 condemn the world, hut that the worldt hrough 
 him might be saved. But notwithstanding 
 this, the wickedness of man is so great, that 
 he refuses the knowledge which is proftered 
 him, and increases the severity of his doom, 
 by rejecting the means of salvation. In this 
 is plainly implied, not only, that some men 
 will perish, but that the mission of Christ will 
 enhance their condemnation. " But the 
 heavens and the earth, which are now, by the 
 same word are kept in store, reserved unto 
 fire, against the day of judgment and perdi- 
 tion of ungodly men." The import of this 
 cannot be mistaken. We have already notic- 
 ed the technical meaning of the day of judg- 
 ment, but here is mentioned the additional 
 circumstance of the general conflagration. 
 The perdition of ungodly men will then take 
 place. 
 
 7. " As also in all his epistles, speaking in 
 them of these things; in which are some- 
 things hard to be understood, which they tliat 
 are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do 
 also the other scriptures, unto their own de- 
 struction." The sense in which destruction 
 
 2d. Peter, iii. 7, 16. 
 7 
 
66 
 
 IS predicated of the wicked has already been 
 noticed. It is here deserving of more serious 
 consideration, because it is said to follow er- 
 roneous views of the bible, which could not 
 be said of any other book, and which on the 
 scheme of universal salvation, is not true. It 
 is only on the supposition, that the scriptures 
 reveal the way in which we must walk or per- 
 ish, that the distortion of their meaning can 
 involve men in misery. 
 
 8. '^ But after thy hardness and impenitent 
 heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath, against 
 the day of wrath and revelation of the right- 
 eous judgment of God. Who will render to 
 every man according to his deeds : to them 
 who by patient continuance in well-doing, 
 seek for glory, and honor, and immortality, 
 eternal life. But unto them that are conten- 
 tious, and do not obey the truth, but obey un- 
 righteousness, indignation and wrath ; tribula- 
 tion and anguish, upon every soul of man that 
 doeth evil, of the Jew first and also of the 
 Gentile." This is the last proof passage to 
 be cited on this occasion, and not the least 
 decisive. It evidently relates to the retribu- 
 
 Romans ii. /> — 9. 
 
67 
 
 tions of eternity. The day of wrath and of 
 the revelation of the righteous judgment of 
 God, properly designates the day of judgment. 
 It is now with God a time of mercy. JNor is 
 there any period of probation, which can be 
 proclaimed to the world as pre-eminently dis- 
 closing his indignation and righteous judg- 
 ments. The punishment is also represented to 
 be the result of an obstinate impenitency, and 
 of a gradual preparation for final condemna- 
 tion. But what is most convincing, is the 
 opposition, which is presented, between the 
 condition of those who obey not the gospel, 
 and that of the righteous, who by patient 
 continuance in well doing, seek for glory, 
 Iionor and immortality. To these eternal 
 life is given, while those are recompens- 
 ed with indignation and wrath, tribulation and 
 anguish. What can more plainly declare the 
 future misery of a portion of mankind? Were 
 I seeking to express the doctrine in terms that 
 defy a false construction, I could not avail 
 myselfof better language. Here then J might 
 safely leave my hearers to decide whether fu- 
 ture punishment is a doctrine of the bible. 
 Let, however, the following considerations be 
 -audidlv weighed. 
 
68 
 
 J . The evidence which has been adduced^ though 
 amply sufficient for the purpose^ is but a small 
 part of ivhat might be advanced, I have pur- 
 posely avoided those passages, which relate 
 to other topics in the general question before 
 us. But even were the texts, hereafter to be 
 noticed, and those already examined, erased 
 from the sacred page, the truth which they 
 assert, would still remain in legible characters. 
 It would be safe to undertake this controversy, 
 were every text which I shall employ in these 
 lectures denied me. And what may seem 
 more surprising to some, it might be sustain- 
 ed by passages, taken exclusively from the 
 epistles of St. Paul. 
 
 2. Should it be said, that that branch of the 
 subject, treated of in this and the preceding 
 lectures has commanded an undue share of 
 attention, since most persons admit, that the 
 wicked will suffer, at least for a limited period ; 
 it may be replied, that my design embraces 
 not only a collection of the evidence, necessa- 
 ry to establish the doctrine of future punish- 
 ment, but an elucidation and defence of the 
 passages, which declare it. My hearers must 
 have noticed, that while most universalists 
 admit the doctrine of a limited punishment. 
 
69 
 
 they task themselves, with the labor of de- 
 ducing a different sense from every passage, 
 which teaches it. Though, however, most of 
 them in our day adopt the notion of a final 
 restoration of the wicked, admitting that they 
 will suffer for a season, yet there are those 
 who contend for the immediate salvation of 
 the whole world. To them the preceding ar- 
 guments are addressed. 
 
 3 The conclusion to tvhich ive have arrived 
 exhibits sin as a very great evil. How offensive 
 to God is the conduct, which involves men in 
 the miseries of hell, even if those miseries 
 are temporary ! That must be more odious 
 and abominable than mankind are apt to al- 
 low, which induces a good and merciful Be- 
 ing, to execute on the wicked such a punish- 
 ment, as indignation and wrath, tribulation 
 and anguish, denote. Weeping, wailing and 
 gnashing of teeth, the smoke of a bottomless 
 pit, the flames of a lake of fire, are terrible 
 descriptions. This life presents no parallel to 
 the pain and agony, here figured forth. But 
 sin is the cause of it. What men often regard 
 of trivial consequence, of casual occurrence, 
 
 and of indifferent character in the sight of 
 
 7# 
 
70 
 
 God, produces not only mental and bodily an- 
 guish here, but more horrid sufferings -here- 
 after. On what principle of prudence then, 
 is sin so often treated as a harmless gaiety or 
 a pardonable weakness. It seems strange, if 
 they believe their own creed, that those who 
 admit the temporary punishment of the wick- 
 ed, are not startled at this reflected picture of 
 human depravity. But perhaps the spirit of 
 unbelief which causes them to doubt the 
 doctrine of eternal punishment, impairs the 
 force of conviction, in respect to a temporary 
 infliction. However this may be, there is no 
 surer inference from our doctrine than the in- 
 expressible odiousness of sin. 
 
 4. Too great efforts and sacrifices to rescue 
 men from perdition^ cannot be made. The alarm 
 of the awakened sinner, the intense anxiety of 
 one pleading for pardon, the urgent entreaties 
 of friends, the affectionate warnings and per- 
 suasive eloquence of the pulpit, feebly express 
 the value" of the soul. It is a theme, which 
 should engross every mind; it should draw- 
 to itself the resources of Christendom, fill the 
 coffers of every evangelical society, send 
 the missionaries of the cross throughout 
 the world, give the bible to every family, re- 
 
71 
 
 form the press, impart to the pulpit new 
 weight and unction, break up every intempe- 
 rate habit, render solitary every haunt of vice, 
 it should make the world solemn and produce 
 the universal enquiry; — ^' what shall I do to 
 be saved." All this is true, were the wicked 
 eventually to be reprieved. And is religious 
 solicitude useless and superstitious? Is the 
 believer in eternal punishment the only per- 
 son, who acts inconsistently, while he 
 lives in the neglect of duty ? Is there 
 not something peculiarly astonishing in 
 the well known stupidity of the restoration- 
 ist? Can he be sincere in professing to 
 believe, that the wicked will suffer for ages the 
 most excruciating torments, and yet manifest 
 such cold indifference to their spiritual wel- 
 fare ? He accuses believers in eternal punish- 
 ment of insincerity, because their solicitude 
 for the wicked is not always uniform, nor ever 
 adequate to the interest involved. Yet when 
 did he ever manifest compassion for those 
 who, according to his own admission, are 
 to perish -for ages of ages? But I forbear; 
 so awful a subject must not be treated like 
 a question between man and man. Yet 
 
let not Christians be reproached for the 
 anxiety which they do feel and manifest 
 in behalf of the soul, for feelings deeper 
 than other hearts experience, for efibrts 
 which afford true religion a place on earth, 
 and which will ultimately extend it through- 
 out the world. 
 
LECTURE IV. 
 
 THE GRADATIONS OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT. 
 
 Luke xii. 47, 48. 
 
 .ind that servant^ which knew his LorcVs wi!/, 
 and prepared not htmself^ neither did according 
 to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 
 But he that knew not, and did commit things 
 worthy of stripes^ shall be beaten with feiv 
 stripes, 
 
 DivixEs have not always been careful to 
 give a proper representation of the difference, 
 which the various wickedness of lost men 
 will occasion, in the intensity of iheir suffer- 
 ings. All are described in some sermons, as 
 sharing equally in the shame and anguish of 
 despair. The consequence has been an en- 
 tire denial of the doctrine of future punish- 
 ment, as too horrible for human belief. The 
 object of the present lecture is to exhibit the 
 
74 
 
 subject, a? far as ability serves me, in its true 
 light, that such unreasonable prejudices may 
 be removed. 
 
 God is able to make the conditions of 
 the wicked in the next life, very various, 
 and far more unlike than the extremes of 
 misery endured on earth. In the exercise of 
 this prerogative, He expressly declares, that 
 there shall be an impartial distribution of jus- 
 tice. *' Every man shall receive his own re- 
 ward, according to his own labor." " For we 
 must all appear before the judgment seat of 
 Christ, that every one may receive the things 
 done in his body, according to that he hath done, 
 'whether it be good or bad.''^ " But after thy 
 hardness and impenitent heart, treasurest up 
 unto thyself, wrath against the day of wrath, 
 and revelation of the righteous judgment of 
 God; who will render to every man according 
 to his deeds!''' '^ But I say unto you, that it 
 shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom 
 in the day of judgment, than for thee." " To 
 whom men have committed much, of him will 
 they ask the more." The text is also explicit 
 on this subject. It is a direct assertion, that 
 those who sin* against the clearest light and 
 hest opportunities of kuovvinir the divine wilK 
 
75 
 
 shall be most severely punished. •• And that 
 servant which knew his lord's will, and pre- 
 pared not himself, neither did according to 
 his will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 
 But he that knew not, and did commit things 
 worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few 
 strips." Such is the evidence, that a grada- 
 tion will be observed, in the sufferings of tiie 
 wicked. 
 
 Before this truth is presented in its practi- 
 cal bearings, it is important to notice two 
 erroneous theories, which have much influ- 
 ence in forming the views pf christians on the 
 general subject. The first of these supposes, 
 that punishment will be proportioned to the 
 capacities of men. The same view is taken 
 by its abettors, in respect to those who are 
 saved. They are said to be, as happy as their 
 capacities admit. All are represented per- 
 fectly happy, but not equally so, in conse- 
 quence of their various capacities for enjoy- 
 ment. As those who receive the least plea- 
 sure are incapable of receiving more, until 
 their powers are enlarged, they can have no 
 ungratified desires, and are ti erefore com- 
 pletely happy ; but the most exalted i; telli- 
 gences are inconceivably happier, because 
 
76 
 
 more exquisitely susceptible. Such in princi- 
 ple, is the theory in respect to those who per- 
 ish. They are said to suffer as much as pos- 
 sible with existing capacities, but not equally, 
 nor as much as they will, when their sensi- 
 bilities become more acute, or when their pow- 
 ers are more expanded. This theory, by ap- 
 portioning to men suffering in different de- 
 grees, only .sccm^tobe in accordance with the 
 scriptural account of rewards and punish- 
 ments ; for those who are to be happy or 
 miserable according to their works, are not 
 good and bad according to their capacities. 
 Persons, whose intellectual and moral facul- 
 ties have been most fully developed and ma- 
 tured, have not always been most distinguish- 
 ed for piety and good works. According to 
 the representations of tlie bible, it is not irra- 
 tional to expect, that some, who are not far 
 removed from idiocy, will be more richly re- 
 warded than many, who have been pre emi- 
 nent in human and divine knowledge. That 
 m nds, vvho^^e capacities for enjoyment are so 
 far from being exactly measured by their 
 faith and virtues, will be changed and mould- 
 ed a ter death, that they may receive their 
 just rewards according to this tiieory, is a 
 
77 
 
 very unphilosophical supposition. But there 
 are objections to its admission, still more de- 
 cisive. Happiness does not depend upon 
 filling a person's capacity. It might produce 
 satiety, and prevent desire, but could not con- 
 vey the purest and richest enjoyment. A 
 sense of the desirableness of things as yet 
 unobtained, is not inconsistent with happi- 
 ness. Such is the nature of the mind, it may 
 be doubted, whether a feeling, that we do not 
 possess all which we wish, is not essential to 
 our enjoying anything. There must be some 
 object of pursuit, something which the mmd 
 desires, and which it is conscious of not hav- 
 ing, or It is at once cut off from the pleasures 
 of activity and enterprize. The theory is un- 
 sound in other respects. What is a capacity 
 for enjoyment, except the power of exercising 
 the faculties on pleasing subjects ? The 
 power of loving must forever be a principal 
 source of gratification. But the heart is 
 always able to love a new and worthy object, 
 without the least alteration in its faculties. 
 We can never say, — its capacities are now 
 full — it can love no more. Two spirits, in the 
 same rank of intelligences, may indeed be 
 contented in the unequal rewards, which God 
 8 
 
78 
 
 bestows upon them. He may reveal to one. 
 while he conceals from the other, objects, 
 which both might appreciate and enjoy. 
 Thus he may distribute his rewards in various 
 proportions, according to the characters of 
 men of tlie same powers. Eut how a capaci- 
 ty for enjoyment can be surfeited, how one 
 can be as happy as possible, I cannot divine. 
 From the nature of the affections, in the exer- 
 cise of which is our chief enjoyment, we must 
 ever be capable of delighting in a new object 
 of pleasure. How then can our happiness be 
 perfect ? Happy as the case admits, we may 
 be, in consequence of possessing no new 
 sources of pleasure ; when were those sources 
 opened, our satisfaction would be exquisite. 
 We are often as happy as circumstances al- 
 low, while other circumstances might make 
 us happier. The same may be said of our 
 sufferings. The spirits of lost men may be 
 capable of keener anguish than they will ever 
 experience, and though they should all be 
 equally susceptible, no two might suffer equal- 
 ly. Were their capacities for pain propor- 
 tional to their guilt, these capacities could 
 not be filled, as the conmion theory supposes, 
 for ti)e term capacity in this, as in the other 
 
79 
 
 case, represents the mind to be something 
 like a measure or resorvoir, into which a 
 definite quantity of misery can be poured. 
 Moral acts, under whatever class they come, 
 are acts of the will, and the fact that the will 
 has acted in reference to ten thousand objects, 
 does not impair its ability of acting, in refer- 
 ence to ten thousand more. Lost spirits hate 
 the perfections of God, and envy the enjoy- 
 ments of heaven, so far as they are acquainted 
 with them ; but a clearer view might, without 
 any alteration in themselves, inflame their 
 passions and embitter their sufferings. So 
 absurd is it, to speak of filling their capaci- 
 ties when every new object presented to their 
 minds, may occasion some tormenting ex- 
 citeuiBntl I have thoui^'it it desirable to ex- 
 pose this prevalent opinion, because, while it 
 seems to admit a gradation in future punish- 
 ment, founded on an impartial distrjbution of 
 justice, it actually contradicts it by represent- 
 ing men as destined to endure all that is pos- 
 sible with their susceptibilities and powers. 
 
 The other theory, connected wit!i this sub- 
 ject, is equally unsupported by the scriptures, 
 though philosophically more plausible. It 
 supposes, that the powers, both of redeemed 
 
80 
 
 and lost men, will constantly expand and 
 strengthen, and cause a constant and un- 
 limited progression, in the happiness of the 
 one and in the misery of the other. This is 
 a mere hypothesis. An increase of capacity, 
 does not necessarily imply, an increase of 
 suffering. Though philosophy teaches, that 
 a growing knowledge of fiicts, may constant- 
 ly raise the tone of wretchedness, it also 
 proves, that habit may make that tolerable, 
 which once seemed ready to crush the suf- 
 ferer. Perhaps the wicked will become more 
 and more miserable, and the righteous more 
 and more blessed, but the idea, unsustained 
 by the bible and by reason, is a supposition 
 altogether gratuitous; to which, as well as to 
 the preceding theory, I cannot but object, be- 
 cause, while it serves no valuable purpose, it 
 prejudices the thinking world against the 
 truth. 
 
 But dismissing these and other theories, 
 adva'iced without sufficient support, I invite 
 your attention to the practical views, suggest- 
 ed by the text. 
 
 1 . Every thing done on earth in the service of 
 God^ will increase the happiness of heaven. Not 
 one holy feeling or act. not one emotion of love. 
 
«1 
 
 of contentment or of submission, not one 
 prayer of faith, or tear of pity, or deed of self- 
 denial, or triumph in temptation, shall be un- 
 rewarded. Such is the doctrine of our Sav- 
 ior; — " And whosoever shall give to drink, 
 unto one of these little ones, a cup of cold 
 water only, in the name of a disciple, verily, I 
 say unto you, he shall in no wise lose his re- 
 ward '• But I introduce it, as an inference 
 from the text. It is a principle of God's 
 government, to rew^ard men according to 
 their deeds, in consistency with the doctrine 
 of salvation by faith. He bestows his favors 
 upon those who believe, in proportion to their 
 fidelity in his service. He takes a just esti- 
 mate of their characters, by considering the 
 age in which they lived, the privileges which 
 they enjoyed, the trials to which they were 
 exposed, the number and precise nature of all 
 their volitions, and whatever has served to 
 make them what they are. With this perfect 
 knowledge of their moral standing, he assigns 
 them their seats in paradise. This is a fact of 
 great practical importance. It speaks in the 
 language of our Saviour ; — " Lay up for your- 
 selves treasures in heaven, where neither 
 8* 
 
82 
 
 moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves 
 do not break through and steal." We think 
 it wise, to labor in youth to make manhood 
 respectable, and in manhood to smooth the 
 decline of life ; although the child may never 
 see mature years, nor the adult old age ; and 
 although, if they do, their efforts may prove ab- 
 ortive, and their hopes be dashed. How much 
 wiser it is, to labor for the meat that never 
 perisheth, for the garments that never decay, 
 for the crown that never fades ; how much 
 wiser, to be diligent and active, where every 
 effort is successful, and the success so glori- 
 ous ! Can any subject commend itself more 
 strongly to our love of happiness, or more 
 effectually engage our best thoughts and 
 efforts ? Can a christian, whose faith has 
 any strength, hesitate, whether to deny 
 himself for the name of Christ, whether to 
 resist temptation, whether to cultivate his 
 piety, when his reward is so sure and 
 so rich ? Is there a man, with views so 
 low, with taste so corrupt, that he will not re- 
 linquish momentary and sordid pleasures, that 
 he will not endure the labors of an hour, for 
 pure and lasting enjoyment ? 
 
2. Impenitent men should avoid sin as their 
 worst enemy. \ say not this, on the ground of 
 its tendency to impair the moral and intel- 
 lectual faculties, and to diminish the prospect 
 of conversion, but as an inference from views, 
 taken in this discourse. I say it, because 
 men are to be rewarded according to their 
 deeds. It is awfully dangerous to sin. Every 
 kind of disobedience wHl receive a just recom- 
 pense, every species and degree of iniquity 
 will be punished, every offence will contribute 
 to the misery of the soul. Two spirits may 
 be wretched, both destitute of positive enjoy- 
 ment, while the condition of one, in compari- 
 son with that of the other, is almost beatitude. 
 This should have a mighty influence on the 
 public morals. It should give sanctity to the 
 civil oath, it should purify human affections, 
 it should regulate all the affairs of life. 
 In every conceivable case, it is adapted to 
 awaken salutary fears. What can be pre- 
 sented to a reflecting mind, more weighty 
 than that which connects sin with certain and 
 exemplary punishment.^ \Yhen the conse- 
 quences of a single offence are tremendous, 
 shall we multiply our crimes ? Shall we, 
 reckless of results, rush on the bosses of the 
 
84 
 
 Almighty's buckler ? Yet there are men who 
 disregarding the consequences of individual 
 sins, boast of obtaining happiness by unlawful 
 means, on as large a scale as possible. Such 
 are they especially, who, in consequence of 
 the inveteracy of vicious propensities, despair 
 of reformation. Looking at heaven, as above 
 their attainment, and at hell as their destined 
 home, they resolve to indulge themselves to 
 the utmost. They appear not to dream, that 
 God will call them into judgment, for every 
 offence. They think not in what rank of 
 sufferers they are to be classed. Their folly 
 is like his, who should take on himself the 
 worst evils of life, because he cannot escape 
 the least. Though this persuasion of the 
 hopelessness of their condition were well 
 founded, how wise it would be, to shun every 
 sin. If they are to perish, they should shrink 
 from vice in its least degree and mildest form, 
 as the envenomer of every bitter feeling, and 
 as an auxiliary to every foe of the soul, that 
 will meet it down the track of eternity. With 
 how many agonizing recollections, with how 
 many stings of conscience, with how many 
 dismal anticipations, with how many stripes 
 from indignant justice, will one sin besiege 
 
 I 
 
85 
 
 the imprisoned spirit forever ! And who, in 
 view of this impending storm, will come oat 
 in provocation ? The sinner challenges the 
 wrath of God. Were it not ourselves, who 
 are thus presumptuous, sin would appear the 
 extreme of madness, as well as of guilt. Oh 
 let us never forget, that the misery of lost 
 souls will be measured by the number and 
 character of their transgressions ! If we are 
 in wicked habits, or exposed to peculiar 
 temptations, let us learn the invaluable im- 
 portance of reformation and of moral resist- 
 ance. Let us learn the motives, which exist, 
 not only for christians to be eminently holy, 
 but for all men, to be scrupulously virtuous. 
 It has been the design of the pre ednig re- 
 marks, to fasten on the mind, both how much 
 the joys of heaven depend on vigilance in the 
 divine life, and how much the sufferings of 
 hell owe their edge and weight, to looseness 
 of morals. Unhappy you may be, in despite 
 of all which mercy can devise to save you, 
 yet not so unhappy as you are in danger of 
 becoming. It is one thing to perish, and 
 quite another thing to perish, an old, harden- 
 ed and abandoned transgressor; it is one 
 thinor for a heathen to be condemned, and 
 
86 
 
 quite another thing to perish from a land of 
 bibles and of sabbaths : it is a glorious thing 
 to be saved at all, but unspeakably more so, 
 to be saved as an apostle. 
 
 3. Since the retributions of eternity are 
 dispensed unequally to those whose capacities 
 are nearly the same, it is evident, that the re- 
 deemed are less happy, and that those who 
 perish are less miserable, than their powers 
 admit. It may, however, be proper to say, in 
 popular language, that all the inhabitants of 
 heaven are perfectly happy. Who is not con- 
 vinced, that a sight of the superior enjoyments 
 of apostles and prophets, and holy martyrs 
 of the cross, exalted above others in the 
 heavenly world, can cause no diminution of 
 happiness, to inferior saints? Those whose 
 rewards are the least, are still the children of 
 God, and have the spirit of Christ. They are 
 thankful for what they receive, and envy not 
 those, who receive more. They must, not- 
 withstanding, be sensible of their inferiority. 
 Their views are not so clear, nor so various, 
 nor is their condition so exalted, as appertains 
 to those, who served God better in this life. 
 They feel, that they are capable of higher 
 happiness, they perceive such happiness is 
 
87 
 
 desirable: and they can only be called per- 
 fectly happy, inasmuch as their feehiigs are 
 all holy, and their enjoyments very great, 
 while not a shadow ofpositive evil, is allowed 
 to approach them. And though the wicked 
 do not suffer, as severely as possible, they 
 may be said, in popular language, to be per- 
 fectly miserable. Some drink deeper of the 
 cup of trembling, than others in the same rank 
 of intelligence, but as they are all unholy, and 
 all tormented, without the least alleviation, 
 they may be called perfectly wretched. 
 
 4. The views which have been taken do not 
 diminish the dread^ which the world of icoe should 
 inspire. Its mildest forms of suffering, may 
 transcend our present feeble conceptions. 
 The language in which it is described, con- 
 veys to the mind, a picture of misery, beyond 
 any thing endured in this world. Those ter- 
 rific names of the mansions of despair, hell, 
 hell-fire, the furnace of fire, the fire which is 
 never quenched, outer darkness, weeping and 
 gnashing of teeth, imply a great degree of se- 
 verity in every case of punishment. There 
 will be no injustice. None will suffer more 
 than he deserves, and every man as much. 
 Yet the lowest seat in heaven, is an archan- 
 
88 
 
 geiic condition, compared with that of the 
 least sufferer in hell. To be saved is one 
 thing, to perish is another, infinitely unlike 
 and unutterably worse. In destruction, is in- 
 volved the loss of all good and the sufferance 
 of all the evik which those names of horrid im- 
 port describe. fn attempting to set this 
 doctrine in its true light, and to remove the 
 objections, which indiscriminate views and 
 unfounded hypotheses, have raised, I have 
 not robbed it of practical force. It still ap- 
 pears dreadful to perish. Who can number 
 his own sins? Who can tell, to what class 
 of sinners he belongs ? We have then every 
 motive, to escape that unknown condition of 
 wretchedness, to which we are exposed. 
 Nor would it contribute to any good practice, 
 to imagine, that the redeemed are equally 
 happy. It is the gracious purpose of God, 
 to reward the penitent according to their 
 services, and to punish the wicked according 
 to their sins. In this, there is much to excite 
 to virtue, much to deter from sin. Does man 
 reflect on this, when he indulges his favorite 
 vice ? When envy, breeding hatred and dis- 
 content, is harbored in his bosom, does he 
 remember, that God will bring him into 
 
89 
 
 judgment? )Vhen avarice, making him un- 
 just, penurious, oppressive and fraudulent, 
 obtains possession of his heart, does he re- 
 member, that God will bring him into judg- 
 ment ? When the love of applause, subject- 
 ing virtue, consistency, honor and religion to 
 disgrace, usurps his mind, does he remember, 
 that God will bring him into judgment ? When, 
 ambition, darkening his reason, his principles 
 and his practice, becomes his passion, does he 
 remember, that God will bring him into judg- 
 ment ? When pleasure, weakening his in- 
 tellect, contracting his views, degrading his 
 taste, and impairing his usefulness, gains the 
 ascendant, does he remember, that God will 
 bring him into judgment ? When intemper- 
 ance, inflaming his appetite, depriving him of 
 conscience, ruining his family, disgracing and 
 corrupting his species, dishonoring his God 
 and brutalizing his own soul, seizes him for 
 its slave, does he remember that God will 
 bring him into judgment ? When stubborn 
 unbelief, chiUing the best sensibiUties of the 
 heart, disabling the best faculties of the mind, 
 and shutting down on the soul the doors of 
 darkness, asserts its undisputed authority over 
 him, does he remember, that God will bring 
 9 
 
90 
 
 him into judgment ? No ; — could he constant- 
 ly behold, how the flames of his future dwell- 
 ing brighten up with more fervid heat and 
 horrid glare on every new act of disobedience, 
 it would destroy his unlawful pleasures. The 
 laughter of sin is thoughtless. It is only 
 when God is forgotten, or his word uncredited, 
 that iniquity is pleasant. Let the heart, then, 
 prompt the memory, and the memory remind 
 the heart, that for every secret thing God will 
 bring thee into judgment — that for every new 
 act of rebellion, justice will demand reprisal. 
 
LECTURE V. 
 
 THE DURATION OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT. 
 Mark ix. 47, 48. 
 
 .ind if thine eye offend thee^ pluck if out : it is 
 
 better for thee^ to enter into the kingdom of God 
 
 with one eye^ than having two eyes to be cast 
 
 into hell-fire ; where their worm dieth not, and 
 
 the fire is not quenched, 
 
 « 
 
 The present lecture is devoted to the ques- 
 tion at issue between believers in eternal pun- 
 ishment, and those who expect the restoration 
 of the wicked to virtue and happiness. They 
 admit, that a part of mankind will be con- 
 demned to a place of torment, but suppose that 
 there is a limit to their sufferino^s, that in the 
 progress of ages the period will arrive, when 
 having repented^ or having expiated their 
 crimes by an adequate punishment, they will 
 be restored to divine favor. I cannot sub- 
 scribe to their opinion. The bible is full and 
 
92 
 
 explicit in declaring, that the state of the 
 wicked in another world is unalterably fixed. 
 Before the proof of this is presented, it is 
 desirable to notice several things, which are 
 often overlooked in the controversy. 
 
 1. The supposition^ that the wicked^ when once 
 condemned, will ever be reprieved, is altogether 
 gratuitous. All the passages, which speak of 
 their punishment, leave the question of its 
 duration untouched, or represent it to be 
 eternal. Nothing is implied in them, like the 
 doctrine of restoration. They either assert, 
 that all men are saved on the same terms and 
 at the same time, or they do not teach univer- 
 sal salvation in any form. It cannot, there- 
 fore, be pretended, that the views, which we 
 are opposing, have any support in the sacred 
 scriptures. It is true, thai lormerly a passage 
 in the third chapter of the Acts of the apos- 
 tles, and another in the first Epistle of Peter, 
 were mentioned as favoring such a supposi- \ 
 tion, but the idea is now generally abandoned. 
 It certainly cannot be sustained. In one of 
 these, it is declared, that heaven must receive 
 the Lord Jesus Christ until the restitution of 
 all things, which God hath spoken by the 
 mouth of all his holy prophets, since the world 
 
93 
 
 began. But it is now admitted, that this 
 restitution, signifies the final accomplishment 
 of the divine predictions. When, whatever 
 has been foretold by the prophets is fulfilled, 
 the Lord will make his second advent and 
 close up the history of this world. In the 
 other passage, it has been supposed, that the 
 apostle spake of our Lord's visiting the 
 abodes of the damned, and proclaiming to 
 them the offers of salvation. " By which also 
 he went and preached to the spirits in prison, 
 which sometime were disobedient, when 
 once the long suffering of God, waited in the 
 days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, 
 wherein few, that is, eight souls, were saved 
 by water.*' By joining this with the preceding 
 verse, and observing the sense of each part, 
 this only will appear to be taught, that Christ, 
 who existed in his spiritual nature in the time 
 of Noah, went in that nature and preached 
 unto the antediluvians, who then lived, but 
 are now in prison. For Christ hath once suf-- 
 fere'i for sins, the just for the unjust, that he 
 might bring us to God, being put to death in the 
 flesh, {that is as respects his human nature) but 
 quickened by the spirit {that is, as respects his 
 spiritual nature) in which spiritual nature he also 
 9=^ 
 
94 
 
 loent and preached to the spirits now in prison,, 
 ivho aforetime in the days of JVoah were disobedi- 
 ent. But it is not important, that I should in- 
 sist upon a point, which probably none will 
 dispute. The doctrine of restoration, is not 
 taught in the bible. Were it therefore true, 
 that all the passages relating to future pun- 
 ishment, leave its duration unascertained, 
 would it not be presumptuous, to risk the 
 soul on the uncertain supposition of its be- 
 coming in the lapse of ages, holy and happy .^ 
 Let the following be assumed, as an example 
 of all that God has said on the subject ; — 
 " And now also the axe is laid unto the root 
 of the trees: therefore, every tree that bring- 
 eth not forth good fruit, is hewn down and 
 cast into the fire." "Brethren if any of you 
 do err from the truth, and one convert him; 
 let him know, that he which converteth the 
 sinner from the error of his way, shall save a 
 soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of 
 sins." Here the certainty of punishment is 
 asserted, but not its endless duration. Yet, 
 if there is no intimation in the bible, that it 
 will ever cease, is it not hazardous to con- 
 clude, that it will ? This state of the question, 
 \ fear, is often disregarded ; and men heed- 
 
95^ 
 
 Jessly set themselves to prove, that everlasting 
 is not eternal, imagining that if this can be 
 done, they need entertain no apprehension of 
 endless condemnation. But were it only de- 
 clared in the bible that the wicked shall be 
 punished, while the righteous are made happy, 
 it would involve a fearful probability, that 
 they will never meet again. 
 
 2. Were the doctrine of restoration true^ it 
 would probably have been taught by Christ, This, 
 believers in it must admit, because they 
 always describe it as a supposition most 
 glorious to God and as absolutely essential to 
 the vindication of his character. They should, 
 therefore, sustain their views by direct and 
 unequivocal testimony from the scriptures. 
 Unless such testimony can be produced, their 
 opinions must be considered unworthy of con- 
 fidence; especially since the greatest interests 
 are involved in arriving at a correct conclu- 
 sion. To this reason for expecting an ex- 
 plicit declaration of the final restoration of 
 the wicked, provided it is to take place, may * 
 be added, the integrity of the divine government. 
 It cannot be imagined, that God would syste- 
 matically employ error, in controlling and 
 actuating his creatures. Either by direct 
 
96 
 
 testimony from Him, or by the want of con- 
 trary testimony, the doctrine of eternal punish- 
 ment has gained the almost undivided con- 
 viction ofmankmd. It has been believed by 
 millions, in every age, and has had a forming 
 hand in their lines of conduct and feeling. Is 
 this a superstition ? Can it be supposed, that 
 God has left a being so imaginative as man. 
 to shudder at ideal forms of distress, and to 
 array with withering apprehensions, a doc- 
 trine, which teaches nothing but fatherly cor- 
 rections or momentary reproof ? Let it not 
 be forgotten, that one text, well authenticated, 
 declaring that the wicked shall suffer only for 
 a season, would have effectually excluded the 
 doctrine of eternal punishment from the 
 christian creed. But there nevertheless it 
 stands, and influences unnumbered minds ; 
 it alarms, it convicts, it urges men to let go 
 of earth, to dash down the cup of iniquity, to 
 press into life. It must be recollected too, 
 that human predilections are not in its favor. 
 Men have been led to believe, in despite of 
 their wishes. It has had opposers ; it has 
 been hated, defamed, persecuted from city to 
 city, and handed about with hissing and in- 
 vective. Still, the body of those who call 
 
97 
 
 tJieniselves christians, confess, that it is taught 
 in their scriptures, and that they can discover 
 no appearances of a contrary doctrine. This 
 could scarcely be the case, were a linal resto- 
 ration spoken of in the bible. Indeed, it is 
 inconsistent with such an idea, for it cannot 
 reasonably be admitted, that God would con- 
 ceal the truth, for the sake of influencing men 
 by fears of imaginary evil. He would not 
 prevail on them to obey him, by permitting 
 them to apprehend a fate, infinitely more 
 dreadful than the worst beings will ever en- 
 dure. If then the doctrine of restoration is 
 true, whence arises the silence of the scrip- 
 tures concerning it ? a silence, from w hich, if 
 not from more direct testimony, has resulted 
 the almost universal persuasion, that the tor- 
 ments of hell will never end. 
 
 3. The first hearers of the gospel must have 
 understood future punishmefit to be eternal^ unless 
 the contrary was expressly ajirrned by their 
 teachers. The Jews, in the time of our Savior, 
 believed, that all, who were not embraced in 
 the covenant made with Abraham, would 
 perish forever. Every scholar also knows, 
 that eternal punishment was a favorite theme 
 of the Greek and Latin poets, and a popular 
 
98 
 
 notion of the multitude. When, therefore. 
 Christ and l)is apostles came to speak of the 
 place of torment, their hearers, whether Jews 
 or Pagans, would need to have their opinions, 
 if erroneous, corrected. If nothing was said on 
 the subject, and no intimation given that they 
 were in an error, they would naturally con- 
 clude, that they had not been mistaken, and 
 would continue to believe in eternal punish- 
 ment. It hence, most manifestly devolves 
 upon believers in a final restoration, to show 
 in what place and in what manner, Christ and 
 his apostles ever controverted the popular 
 opinion. 
 
 4. Ihat the icicked icill never be reslorcd to 
 virtue and happiness^ is fairly inj erred from the 
 moral tendency of punishment. Alone it can 
 never produce contrition. The first induce- 
 ment to repent, which can operate on the hu- 
 man mind, is the apprehension of personal 
 evil. But neither that apprehension, nor 
 actual suffering, can subdue the will and melt 
 tlie heart. Danger may excite alarm and in- 
 duce in(juiry, but it cannot reconcile a rebel- 
 lious mind and call forth emotions of gratitude 
 and love. The goodness of God leadeth men 
 to repentance. It is not the fire of hell, which 
 
99 
 
 can make them sorry after a godly sort. That 
 can only add intensity to their hate, and in- 
 flame their malevolence against God and his 
 laws. It is not in the nature of man, to be 
 thus won to holy views and feelings. The 
 infliction of punishment, therefore, supplies no 
 means and affords no prospect, of the vohm- 
 tary subjection of the wicked to the govern- 
 ment of God. It rather, by exciting opposition, 
 and confirming hatred, tends to perpetuate 
 rebellion. 
 
 5. If the wicked deserve any punishment, as its 
 infliction proves they do^ they ivdl never cease to 
 deserve it. They take very partial views of the 
 subject, who imagine, that the sins of this 
 life are the only actions, for which the final 
 rejectors of the gospel will be confined in 
 despair. They will increase their own ill 
 desert, by ceaseless resistance to the govern- 
 ment of God. The sins done in the body do 
 indeed merit everlasting destruction. But 
 were this denied, the wicked in hell are per- 
 petually violating the unimpaired obligation 
 of supreme love to God, and consequently 
 creating a reason for tl-eir endless punishment. 
 Did not the nature of the casie establish this, 
 the word of God would make it certain. 
 
100 
 
 - Let him that is filthy be fiUhy still/' Moral 
 impurity consists in a bad state of the affec- 
 tions. Were the wicked to exercise pi- 
 ous feelings, they would no longer be unclean. 
 They will, it hence appears, continue in sin. 
 In other words, the souls of lost men are un- 
 der a law, which they violate, and to the 
 penalties of which, they are unceasingly ex- 
 posing themselves. The time can never ar- 
 rive, in which they will not deserve additional 
 punishment for acts just committed. While 
 they are suflfering for the sins of this life, they 
 will be provoking the justice of God to punish 
 them for new, more numerous and it may be 
 more aggravated offences. The sin of the fallen 
 angels, in tempting our first parents to take 
 the forbidden fruit and in deceiving their 
 posterity, is no more punishable than the sins, 
 which wicked men will commit after their final 
 sentence. And as both the bible and the na- 
 ture of the case show, that they will continue 
 to offend, there is a reason constantly arising, 
 for perpetuating their punishment. 
 
 G. If the doctrine of restoration is truc^ tin 
 ivicked ivill be released without dcscrvin<j; aap'ittu/, 
 or they ivill escape^ having expiated their sins by an 
 adequate punishment^ on the ground of Just ire. f 
 
 i 
 
101 
 
 But It is not pretended, from any thing in tlie 
 bible, that they will ever be restored because 
 they no longer deserve to be punished. Such 
 a supposition is often made, but it is not found 
 in the word of God. The salvation of men, 
 as far as it extends, is always spoken of as the 
 result of forgiveness. The texts, which are 
 employed to prove universal salvation refer the 
 whole effect, whatever it is, to the mercy of 
 God ; and in no instance intimate that the 
 wicked will expiate their sins and complete 
 the period of lawful punishment, by suffer- 
 ing to the extent of their crimes. None of 
 these imply the doctrine of restoration on the 
 ground of justice, whatever else they may 
 teach. If, as it is alleged, they assert it at 
 all, it is through the mediation of Christ and 
 the forgiveness of sins. But lost men will not 
 escape through forgiveness, for the scriptures 
 are most explicit in deciding that there is no 
 pardon beyond the grave. '• But if ye forgive 
 not men their trespasses, neither will your fa- 
 ther forgive your trespasses." The doctrine 
 of restoration is, therefore, not true, because 
 neither of the suppositions on which it rests, 
 can be maintained. 
 
 7. The above conclusion is, with equal satis- 
 10 
 
102 
 
 faction^ established by many of the passages, ichick 
 have been (quoted to prove merely that there is a 
 state of future punishment. In them it is declar- 
 ed, tliat certain men shall not inherit the king- 
 dom of God, that they shall in no case enter 
 into it, that they shall have their portion in the 
 world of misery. These denunciations leave 
 no room for an honest doubt, that their suf- 
 ferings will be perpetual. Were the scrip- 
 tures silent, as it respects a more clear and 
 positive declaration on the subject, it might 
 justly be thought hazardous to deny the 
 eternity of future punishment. 
 
 These considerations, I present to my 
 hearers, not as unanswerable arguments ; 
 though, taken collectively, they are enough to 
 convince me of the unreasonableness and te- 
 merity of expecting deliverance from the 
 world of despair. The sources of evidence, 
 to which 1 hereafter call your attention, aflbrd 
 such as is explicit and unanswerable. 
 
 1 . The curse of the laii\ or the penalty by which 
 it is enforced, is eternal death. That from which 
 men are rescued by faith in Jesus Christ, is 
 that to which they expose themselves by sin. 
 "And as Moses lifted uj) the serpent in the 
 wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be 
 
103 
 
 lifted up, that whosoever believeth in him 
 should not perish^ but have eternal life. For 
 God so loved the world, that he gave his oniy 
 begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him 
 should not perish, but have everlasting life,'*'' 
 Christ came to save men from destruction, 
 and to confer on them eternal happiness. But 
 if they, by violating the law, have not forfeited 
 this happiness, it cannot be the design of 
 Christianity to confer it. Without a Savior, 
 they are condemned, in consequence of their 
 sins. to eternal exclusion from heaven; and as 
 perishing is the antithesis of this, to eter- 
 nal suffering. Such happiness Christ confers, 
 such misery he averts; and hence it follows, 
 that the curse of the law, or that which is in- 
 curred by transgression, is endless punish- 
 ment. But those, who reject the gospel, 
 which we have seen some men do, incur this 
 penalty, and can, therefore, on the ground of 
 justice, never escape. It is to be observed, 
 too, that as believers are saved by faith, 
 as the only condition of salvation, it implies, 
 that the consequences of unbelief are eternal. 
 Why should everlasting life be promised them, 
 as a reward of repentance and faith, if they 
 have not forfeited it, and if they are, whatever 
 
104 
 
 their conduct may be, to enjoy it? Christ 
 would not, in such a case, be the author of 
 eternal life, but only a Savior from tempora- 
 ry evils, and the author of happiness, during 
 that limited period. 
 
 II. T'he text and other passages of similar 
 phraseology^ are unequivocal evidence against the 
 doctrine of restoration. They declare that the 
 wicked shall be punished with unquenchable 
 fire, or that there shall be no termination to 
 their torments. "Whose fan is in his hand, 
 and he will thoroughly purge his floor, and will 
 gather the wheat into his garner, but the chaff 
 he will burn with fire unquenchable." " And 
 if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better 
 for thee to enter into life maimed, than having 
 two hands to go into hell, into the fire that 
 never shall be quenched: where their worm 
 dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.'* 
 These declarations will receive a separate 
 and particular examination. It is important, 
 however, to make my younger hearers first 
 acquainted with a rule of interpretation, to be 
 applied in the subsecpient part of this dis- 
 course and of essential use in decipher- 
 
 J.uke 3. 19. Murk 9. 43, 44. 
 
105 
 
 ing the meaning of language. The rule is 
 this. Words are to be used in their common and 
 obvious impo /, nnlrss if is modified by the nature 
 of the subject or by the design of the writer. 
 Universal terms, as the world, mankind, 
 all men, are sometimes to be limited, but 
 never, unless the context makes it apparent, 
 that the whole human race is not intended. 
 It thus happens, also, that terms expressing 
 duration denote the longest period of which 
 the subject united with them, is capable. The 
 same word may, in one apphcation. express 
 an absolute eternity, while in another it in- 
 cludes only a short period of time. But no 
 ambiguity, or perplexity arises from this vari- 
 ous use of language, because the subject itself 
 always announces its exact signification. 
 You sell an estate, assigning it to the pur- 
 chaser and his heirs forever^ and though for- 
 ever in its common sense expresses an abso- 
 lute eternity, it is not in this connexion thus 
 understood. If you should speak of losing 
 your soul forever, the language w^ould be 
 equally intelligible. In the first instance, 
 forever signifies the longest period in which 
 an estate can be entailed, or until it shall be 
 voluntarily disposed of; and in the other case. 
 10* 
 
106 
 
 it signifies the longest period, in which the 
 soul can be lost. Let this rule be applied, and 
 no doubt will exist, whether the duration 
 spoken of is limited or not. When that which 
 is said to be eternal, without end, unquencha- 
 ble, or forever, is something which belongs 
 exclusively to time, it hmits the signification 
 of these terms. But when it is something, 
 which in its nature extends beyond the grave, 
 and may subsist without end, these terms are 
 not to be limited, but to be taken in their 
 literal sense, as denoting an absolute eternity. 
 The everlasting hills or mountains, are hills 
 or mountains, which remain as long as time 
 endures. The subject, of which everlasting 
 is here predicated, does not admit of a longer 
 duration than the continuance of the earth. 
 The everlasting God is a being, whose exist- 
 ence is not bounded by time. In the first of 
 these instances, everlasting denotes a tempo- 
 rary, but in the second, an endless duration. 
 It may be said of the fire of a perpetually ac- 
 tive volcano, that it is unquenchable, that it 
 never shall be quenched, without causing any 
 misapprehension or leading the hearer to sup- 
 pose, that his informant believes the earth 
 shall never be destroyed. And the language 
 
107 
 
 might be true, under the Umitation which the 
 subject imposes. When it is said also of the 
 fire of hell, that it is unquenchable, that it 
 never shall be quenched, the declaration is 
 equally unambiguous ; for as the subject is 
 not limited by the boundaries of time, it is 
 capable of an absolute eternity. It is satis- 
 factorily inferred, that the fires of hell shall 
 never be quenched, or never cease to burn . 
 or, by stripping the idea of its figurative dress, 
 that the miseries of lost men will never termi- 
 nate. It is, therefore, scarcely necessary, 
 when we examine these passages by just prin- 
 ciples of interpretation, to give them any 
 further notice. It is enough to assert, without 
 other proof, that th(3y teach the endless dura- 
 tion of future torments. For such an asser- 
 tion cannot be disproved. Instances may 
 perhaps be cited, in which unquenchable is 
 applied to punishments which have an end, 
 but never in any case where future punish- 
 ment is the subject of affirmation. Temporal 
 calamities may be described, under the figure 
 of unquenchable fire, provided they continue 
 so long as the subjects of them exist, but 
 the punishments of the future world cannot 
 be thus described, unless they are absolutely 
 
108 
 
 errdless. Allow me to comprehend what has 
 been said in one sentence. If God threatens 
 a nation with his displeasure, declaring that 
 his wrath shall burn and none shall quench 
 it, it is understood, that this nation shall be 
 involved in calamities as long as it endures, 
 but if he threatens persons in reference to th^ 
 future state with indignation, which shall burn 
 and not be quenched, it can only denote an 
 endless punishment. It may be remarked, too, 
 that as God never threatens men with tem- 
 poral calamities, in language of such severe 
 reprobation, unless they are very abandoned 
 sinners, it may be used, even in such cases, 
 with reference to punishments which shall 
 succeed this life and be literally perpetual. 
 In illustration of these facts, nothing better 
 could be desired, than the passages so often 
 quoted from the Old Testament to show, that 
 the terms everlasting and unquenchable, 
 when applied to the miseries of the damn- 
 ed, do not denote eternal punishment. — 
 " It shall not be quenched night nor 
 day; the smoke thereof shall go up forever, 
 from generation to generation it shall lie 
 waste; none shall pass through it forever 
 and ever." " Behold, mine anger and my fury 
 
109 
 
 shall be poured out upon this place, upon man 
 and upon beast, and upon the trees of the 
 field, and upon the fruit of the ground ; and 
 it shall burn and shall not be quenched." 
 ** And [ will bring an everlasting reproach 
 upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall 
 not be forgotten." There is no misunder- 
 standing these passages. They apply the 
 words, everlasting, unquenchable, forever and 
 ever, to judgments which were to fall, in part 
 at least upon the wicked in this life, and which 
 were utterly to ruin them. The hopelessness 
 of tlieir condition, the inflexible purpose of 
 God, never to forgive, and never to withdraw 
 his hand from the work of destruction, is thus 
 forcibly expressed. No one is in danger of 
 supposing, that an absolute eternity is intend- 
 ed, so far as the subject of discourse is. in its 
 own nature, temporary. The smoke of the 
 land of Idumea. cannot literally ascend up 
 forever and ever. The reader very properly 
 hmits the language, to mean, that it will be 
 an object of the divine displeasure, so long as 
 it exists. But this denunciation, as well as 
 that of bringing upon the Jews an everlasting 
 reproach, may relate, not only to temporal ca- 
 lamities, but to the eternal displeasure of God, 
 
110 
 
 Nor does such a supposition, assign a double 
 sense to the language. It only asferts, that 
 God will never be reconciled to those, against 
 whom these threatenings are uttered. And if 
 this is true, if those, whom he pursues with 
 his displeasure to the end of life, are also the 
 enemies of his government, and the objects of 
 his indignation after death, the literal im])ort 
 belongs to the language. But however this 
 may be, there is manifestly no argument to 
 be drawn from the Old Testament use of un- 
 quenchable and everlasting, against the sense 
 which is generally assigned them in the New. 
 If it should be contended, that the judgments 
 mentioned in the 0!d Testament, as everlast- 
 ing and unquenchable, are evidently tempo- 
 ral; then, by a plain rule of interpretation, 
 they are said to last only during the natural 
 lives of those who suffer them; but if these 
 judgments are of a nature to last forever, ever- 
 lasting and unquenchable imply that they 
 shall be endless. Tims, a case scarcely arises, 
 in which the use of these and similar terms 
 IS ambiguous. The words are perpetJially 
 used in Eng'ish books, sometimes denoting an 
 absolute eiernity, and sometimes but a short 
 period, yet always with perfect perspicuity. 
 
Hi 
 
 When some hated truth is not to be rejected, 
 men apply the rule, which has been stated, 
 without knowing it, and arrive at the true 
 sense without failure, and without difficulty. 
 A servant forever, they see at once, is a ser- 
 vant as long as he can be, or during his natural 
 life. To be in heaven forever, is to be there 
 always. But mention those passages, where 
 future punishment is said to be everlasting or 
 unquenchable, and instead of inferring, as 
 they should, that it is endless, they abandon 
 their rule, deny the only just conclusion, and 
 attempt to justify themselves by saying, that 
 everlasting and unquenchable do not always 
 denote an endless duration I A servant for- 
 ever, they very gravely tell us, is a servant 
 only so long as he lives, and everlasting hills, 
 are hills which endure only while the earth 
 exists ! But if they would judge of the mean- 
 ing of language, when applied to future tor- 
 ments, by the same rule of interpretation, by 
 which they conclude that the righteous shall 
 never lose their seats in heaven, there would 
 not be an universalist among believers in the 
 bible. To say, that the wicked shall be cast 
 into hell, into the fire that never shall be 
 quenched, is to assert, that a punishment, 
 
112 
 
 which, in its nature is capable of endless in- 
 fliction, shall never cease. It therefore never 
 will. Were the principle denied on which 
 this conclusion rests, language must in a 
 measure cease lo be a medium of thought. 
 How does this audience know, that the speak- 
 er is a believer in eternal punishment ? He 
 has used terms, no more unambiguous than 
 the sacred writers employ. But you judge of 
 his meaning, by the same rules, which, when 
 applied to their language, would lead you to 
 acknowledge, that future punishment is taught 
 by them. Should you refuse to admit the 
 authority of this rule of interpretation, in cases 
 where future punishment is the subject, vou 
 would make its endless duration difficult or 
 impossible to reveal. You can at least ima- 
 gine that it is eternal, and that God intends 
 to make it known. But what terms, sufficient- 
 ly explicit, can he employ ? If he represents it. 
 under the figure of a fire eternal and unquench- 
 able, you reply, that temporal judgments 
 are sometimes thus described. If you will 
 trifle so egregiously with the plainest r^les of 
 criticism, with rules, which, in all other cases, 
 lead you infallibly to correct conclusions, no 
 revelation on the subject can be made you. 
 
By voluntarily abandoning the only safe guide, 
 you lose your way and stumble at every 
 step. The word of God can afford you no 
 light, you wrest it to your own destruction. 
 But though it is true that just rules of inter- 
 pretation decide, that eternal punishment is 
 taught under the figure of unquenchable fire, 
 yet a particular examination of the passages 
 where the expression occurs, will strengthen 
 the conclusion. To this, your attention is in- 
 vited. In the third chapter of Matthew, John 
 the Baptist describes the Messiah in these 
 terms. '^ Whose fan is in his hand, and he 
 will thoroughly purge his floor, and gather his 
 wheat into the garner ; but he will burn up 
 the chaflf with unquenchable fire." It will not 
 be disputed, that good men are denoted by 
 the wheat, and bad men by the chaff". Christ 
 will gather his wheat into the garner, that is, 
 preserve the righteous from being lost and 
 destroyed ; but he will burn up the chaflf with 
 unquenchable fire or subject the wicked to 
 ceaseless and everlasting misery. This is the 
 obvious and incontrovertible sense. For 
 when it is recollected, that fire is emblema- 
 tical of punishment, unquenchable can only 
 signify its endless perpetuity. It is in vain to 
 11 
 
114 
 
 yay, that the lire may be endless, while beings 
 subjected to its action escape. Believers in 
 a restoration assume for granted, that a ma- 
 terial fire is meant, which they contend may 
 continue forever while its miserable victims 
 are reprieved. But the language is figura- 
 tive, being only a forcible mode of expressing 
 the severity of punishment. What then is the 
 use of the adjective unquenchable ? It doubt- 
 less has a significant import. As the punish- 
 ment of which it is descriptive, is manifestly 
 to be inflicted after death, it must denote its 
 endless duration. It cannot mean that the 
 wicked shall be utterly consumed or annihilat- 
 ed, for then to be burned up with fire would 
 convey the whole idea; unquenchable would 
 be redundant. But the greatest reliance for 
 the illustration of this language, is placed 
 upon the passages in the ninth chapter of 
 Mark, one of which stands at the head of this 
 discourse. It has already been shown, that 
 gehenna, translated hell, is the name of the 
 place of fiiture torment. The fire, which is 
 mentioned in the text, as never to be quench- 
 ed, denotes the punishments of that world. 
 They never terminate. The fire shall never 
 be quenched. Nor should the other descrio- 
 
115 
 
 tion, contained in the text, be overlooked. 
 "It is better for thee to enter into the king- 
 dom of God with one eye, than having two 
 eyes to be cast into hell-fire, where their worm 
 dieth not,'''' This last expression is likewise 
 borrov/ed from the valley of Hinnom. There 
 worms preyed on the bodies of the dead, so 
 long as they remained, but when they were 
 enterely decayed, the worms also perished. 
 But it is not so in hell. Worms shall prey on 
 the indestructible forms of the wicked forever, 
 that is, their punishment shall never termi- 
 nate. Let it not be forgotten in these inqui- 
 ries, that the worm which dieth not is a figu- 
 rative representation, and not a philosophical 
 account of future misery. Dead bodies, 
 when thrown out to putrify and decay, present 
 a woful picture of wretchedness and are so 
 far a striking description of the miseries of 
 hell. But there is an obvious point of dissi- 
 milarity, to which the text has reference. In 
 one case, the body retin*ns to its native dust 
 and the worm dies; in the other.tlie body is 
 immortal and the worm which preys on it, 
 never dies. Since the worm denotes the 
 wretched condition of the wicked, its death- 
 less nature signifies that their misery is end- 
 
116 
 
 less. Nor is this conclusion removed, by the 
 passage in the sixty-sixth chapter of Isaiah, 
 to which Christ seems to have alluded. " And 
 they shall go forth and look upon the car- 
 casses of the men, that have transgressed 
 against me : for their worm shall not die, nei- 
 ther shall their fire be quenched; and they 
 shall be an abhorring unto all flesh." This 
 is said to take place after the conversion of 
 the world, and appears to be a dramatic 
 representation of the glorious state of the 
 church, when it shall be universal, and when 
 all the enemies of God shall be punished. 
 The worm that never dies, the fire that shall 
 never be quenched, are there, also used to 
 denote the everlasting misery of transgress- 
 ors. 
 
 The remainder of this investigation must 
 be deferred until another opportunity. Be- 
 lieving, however, that the doctrine of eternal 
 punishment is already completely established, 
 f would add a word on the benevolence mani- 
 fested by a faithful minister of Christ in the 
 discharge of this part of his commission. It 
 is sometimes thought, that they alone imitate 
 the spirit of our divine master, who conceal 
 fron) their hearers the awful retributions of 
 
117 
 
 eternity. But how difterentis the fact? What 
 compassion is there in conceahng evils, to 
 which men are actually exposed and from 
 which they cannot escape, except by efforts 
 specially directed to that end ? The dan- 
 gers which threaten them cannot be avoided, 
 except through faith in Jesus Christ; but this 
 they will never exercise, until the law of God 
 with its terrible sanctions, has been exhibited. 
 The object of preaching is to restore to loyal- 
 ty the revolted subjects of God by leading 
 them to repentance ; which cannot be done 
 where a knowledge of eternal punishment, the 
 only proper measure of guilt is withheld and 
 where a false estimate of character is neces- 
 sarily made. " They that be whole need not a 
 physician, but they that are sick." Christ is 
 nothing to those, who perceive not the sin- 
 fulness of sin nor their ow^n guilt, nor the im- 
 minent wrath of God. To such he is no shield 
 nor high tower nor rock of defence nor ark 
 of safety. While they deny that the bible sen- 
 tences to remediless ruin the impenitent world, 
 they act agreeably to their creed and stand 
 exposed to the gathering storm, till bursting 
 forth, it overwhelms them. How can he, who 
 is ignorant of the sanctions of the law, be 
 11* 
 
118 
 
 convinced of the misery of a wicked state, and 
 of the peculiar glory of those who have their 
 fruit unto holiness ? How can he know the 
 odiousness of sin, how can he have a just sense 
 of his unworthiness, how can he exalt the 
 Savior to the first place in his affections, how 
 can he be rescued from his apostacy and from 
 the misery naturally incident to transgression ? 
 Such effects belong exclusively to that law 
 which converts the soul, which saves moral 
 beings by fear, which persuades the holy to 
 remain allegiant and the rebellious to return to 
 God, and which thus forms the ground and pil- 
 lar of the divine government. Grateful indeed 
 should we be, that our danger and way of es- 
 cape are revealed! We should hear with 
 deep solemnity those truths repeated from the 
 pulpit, upon the belief of which depend the 
 structure of religion in our souls and all our 
 well grounded hopes of a blessed hereafter. 
 Could concealment, on the part of the prcacii- 
 er, render the danger any less real and appal- 
 ling to his hearers, could he, by persuading 
 them, that God will not punish the wicked, 
 reverse the fact, he would have the semblance 
 of an apology for proclaiming im|)unity in sin. 
 But ho cannot. Wlule, therefore, it remains. 
 
119 
 
 true, that the wicked shall be turned into hell 
 and all the nations that forget God, it will be 
 benevolent to warn every man of his exposure 
 and to persuade every man by these terrors of 
 the Lord, to renounce his sins and to attach 
 himself to the cross of Christ. 
 
LECTURE VI. 
 
 THE DURATION OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT. 
 
 2. Peter ii. 17. 
 
 These are wells ivithout wafer^ clouds that are 
 carried with a tempest ; to whom the mist of 
 darkness is reserved forever. 
 
 That lost men will never be restored to 
 happiness is apparent from passages which 
 declare their punishment to be forever., forever 
 and ever., eternal and everlasting. The corres- 
 ponding words in the original Greek, are aiofi 
 and aionios. It will be best to acquaint our- 
 selves with their general use and import, be- 
 fore we examine their particular apphcation 
 to future punishment. 
 
 I. ^ion occurs in one hundred and four 
 passages in the New Testament. Of these 
 instances of its use, fifty-nine relate to God or 
 to his kingdom, in such a manner tliat an abso- 
 lute eternity must be intended. In six ofthc 
 
121 
 
 remaining passages, it is applied to future 
 punishment. There are only thirty-nine, in 
 which it can be pretended, without begging 
 the question, that it signifies a limited dura- 
 tion. If then, the most common use of the 
 word is to decide its meaning when applied 
 to future punishment, that punishment is 
 proved to be eternal. But a just estimation 
 of the argument to be derived from the appli- 
 cations of this word, depends upon under- 
 standing a peculiar sense in which the Jews 
 were accustomed to employ it. They divided 
 duration into two periods. The former com- 
 prehended the time anterior to the establish- 
 ment of the Messiah's kingdom, the latter em- 
 braced all succeeding ages. The first of these 
 periods, called the present aion, was distin- 
 guished by weakness, vice and misery; the 
 second, called the aion to come, they supposed, 
 would be a time of uncommon prosperity and 
 peace. In one or the other of these senses, 
 it is used in nearly all the thirty-nine passages 
 mentioned above. The following are fair 
 examples. "• But he shall receive an hundred 
 fold, now in this time, houses and brethren 
 and sisters and mothers and children and 
 lands with persecutions ; and in the world to 
 
122 
 
 come, (the aion to come) eternal life.'- " Who 
 shall receive manifold more in the preisent 
 time, and in the world to come, (that age 
 which succeeds the judgment) life everlast- 
 ing.*' '*The enemy that sowed them is the 
 devil, the harvest is the end of the world, (of 
 the present aion) and the reapers are the an- 
 gels." '' For Demas hath forsaken me, hav- 
 ing loved this present world,'" or the vain and 
 transitory things of the aion which precedes 
 the judgment day and the complete estabhsh- 
 ment of the Messiah's kingdom. " Now all 
 these things happened unto them for exam- 
 ples, and they are written for our admonition, 
 upon w^hom the ends of the world, (of this 
 aion or order of things) are come." 
 
 It is natural and important to inquire, how 
 the Jews came to attach this signification to a 
 word, which properly denotes unhmited dura- 
 tion. The answer is easy. By dividing du- 
 ration into two periods, calling one the 
 present age and the other the age to come, 
 they do not necessarily restrict either to the 
 limitations of measurable time. The former 
 age comprehends the present witii all past 
 periods, the latter age extends through all 
 which are to come. One extends from ever- 
 
123 
 
 lasting, the other to everlasting — each is a 
 proper eternity. As, however, aion is the 
 name of periods antecedent to tfie happy 
 reign of the Messiah, it often assumes a more 
 limited sense, being sometimes employed 
 without reference to the successions of time 
 for the things of this world, and sometimes for 
 the period of human hfe. When this use of 
 the word and its origin are considered, it ap- 
 pears that the exceptions to its literal import 
 are very rare. In the instances cited above 
 of its limited signification and in every other 
 in which duration is expressed, it might be 
 translated eternity, ''- Who shall not receive 
 manifold more in the present time, and in the 
 world to come (in the eternity to come) life 
 everlasting." Here, then, I may again de- 
 mand, if the common use of a word is to de- 
 cide its meaning in its particular applications, 
 whether eternal punishment is not taught in the 
 following and similar passages. '• These are 
 wells without water, clouds that are carried 
 with a tempest, to whom the mist of darkness 
 is reserved forever.''^ The evidence on which 
 the question is to be decided, is tliis ; — j^ion is 
 used two or three times for the universe and 
 several times for the things of this world. In 
 
121 
 
 these cases it does not express duration, ei- 
 ther limited or eternal, and consequently does 
 not assist us in determining its meaning when 
 it relates to time. In several instances, it ei- 
 ther denotes the periods which precede the 
 establishment of the Messiah's kingdom or 
 those which succeed, both of which extend 
 through immeasurable or eternal duration. In 
 all the remaining instances of its use, except 
 six in which it is applied to future punish- 
 ment, it relates to things which by the admis- 
 sion of all christians are endless. According 
 to its common acceptation, therefore, it is to 
 be translated forever and so understood when 
 future punishment is the subject of affirmation. 
 To this convincing view of the subject an 
 additional consideration is to be added ; for 
 the case has not been stated in terms so favor- 
 able to the doctrine of eternal punishment as 
 it should be. Whenever aion has reference 
 to future punishment, it is put in the accusa- 
 tive case and governed by a preposition signi- 
 fying ^^/o." In such places, it is necessarily 
 translated, to eternity or forever. Fifty-nine 
 of these are undoubted instances of an endless 
 sense, and the remaining six relate to future 
 punishment, which, so far as common use is 
 
12,) 
 
 concerned, is proof that they too denote 
 eternal duration. Such is the state of the ar- 
 gument in favor of eternal punishment, from 
 the general use of aion. An examination of 
 the passages, in which it occurs, shall now be 
 attempted, for the purpose of showmg that 
 there is no occasion for assigning it a mean- 
 ing foreign to its original and common import. 
 One of these passages has just been quoted 
 and needs no comment. The second, you will 
 find in the epistle of Jude. '^ Raging waves 
 of the sea, foaming out their own shame, 
 wandering stars, to whom is reserved the 
 blackness of darkness /orei^er." This is said 
 of false professors, men of very flagitious lives, 
 who crept into the primitive church and be- 
 came the authors of great abuses. It is un- 
 deniable from the nature of the imagery em- 
 ployed, that their utter and remediless ruin is 
 predicted. The passages next to be cited are 
 in the fourteenth, nineteenth and twentieth 
 chapters of the Apocalypse of St. John. '• And 
 the smoke of their torment ascender h up /or- 
 cver and ever : and they have no rest day nor 
 night, who worship the beast and his image 
 and whosoever receiveth the mark of his 
 name." ^- And again they said, Alleluia ! 
 12 
 
i2b 
 
 And her smoke rose \}\) forever anclevery " AT\ci 
 the devil that deceived them was cast into 
 the lake of fire and brimstone, where the 
 beast and the false prophet are, and shall be 
 tormented day and inght forever and ever,'"' In 
 the first instance, the denunciation is directed 
 against pagan Rome, and the fate of those 
 idolaters is contrasted with the rewards of 
 constancy, which the worshippers of the true 
 God receive in heaven. They are represent- 
 ed as sufi'ering forever in hell, or as destined 
 to suflfer through the eternal age which is to 
 come. The second passage describes in the 
 same terms the fate of the unbelieving Jews. 
 In the last, it is said, that the devil shall be 
 tormented forever and ever in the lake of fire 
 and brimstone, where are the beast or the 
 worshippers of idols, and the false prophet or 
 all the friends and propagators of error. 
 This is represented as taking place imme- 
 diately before the final judgment, at the close 
 of which transaction, whosoever is not found 
 written in the book of life w ill be cast into the 
 same place oi torment. The lake o/y/rr there- 
 fore denotes the punishment which is else- 
 where denominated kell-fire^ the furnace of 
 fire, outer darkness and everlasting fire. And 
 
127 
 
 what other senrfc can here be attached to 
 aion, translated forever, but endless duration? 
 It does not mean the universe, it does not 
 mean the things of this world, it does not 
 mean the age anterior to the Messiah's reign ; 
 it must, therefore, mean that which is to 
 come, or all future time, for this is its only 
 remaining signification. The other passage, 
 in which aion is used in reference to future 
 punishment, is in the third chapter of St. 
 Mark. " But he that shall blaspheme against 
 the Holy Ghost, hath never forgiveness, but is 
 in danger of eternal damnation." Aion here 
 occurs in the phrase, '* hath never forgive- 
 ness." The word, translated eternal in the 
 last clause of the verse, is aionios. They are 
 evidently used as synonymous, the sentiment 
 being repeated for the sake of intensity. But 
 he that shall blaspheme against the Holy 
 Ghost, harh not forgiveness /oret^cr, but is de- 
 serving Oi eternal damnation. That an absolute 
 eternity is meant, a parallel passage sutfi- 
 ciently demonstrates by asserting, that such 
 blasphemers shall be forgiven neither in this 
 world neither in the world to come. No- 
 thing now remains, but to sum up the argu- 
 ment contained in the texts in favor of endless 
 
128 
 
 punishment. If the passages themselves are 
 examined, they lead to the belief thai aion is 
 used in the endless sense, and if its original 
 and common import is to be regarded, the 
 same conclusion is established. Hence it ap- 
 pears, that lost men will never be restored to 
 virtue and happiness. 
 
 2. Aionios is found in the New Testament 
 in seventy-one passages. In sixty of these it 
 is applied, either to God, to heaven, to the 
 happiness of the righteous, or to the gospel or 
 kingdom of Christ, in such a manner as must 
 be admitted to imply an endless duration. In six 
 of the remaining passages, only eleven in all, 
 it is used with reference to future punishment. 
 The other five I shall now transcribe, that 
 each may judge for himself, whether an eter- 
 nal duration is not signified. ^^Who hath 
 saved us, and called us with a holy calling, 
 not according to our works, but according to 
 his own purpose and grace, which was given 
 us in Christ Jesus before the ivor/d began,'" or 
 from eternity. ^* In hope of eternal life, which 
 God that cannot lie. promised before the world 
 hegan^^^ or from eternity. ^' Now to him that 
 
 I Timothy, i. 9. Titus, i, 2 
 
129 
 
 IS of power to establish you. according to my 
 gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, ac- 
 cording to the revelation of the mystery, which 
 was kept secret since the ivorld began^^^ or from 
 eternity. ''^Mp^ perhaps he therefore depart- 
 ed %r a seiPbn, that thou shouldest receive 
 him/o/ercr.'' Here the apostle has reference 
 to the relation in which Philemon and Onesi- 
 mus stood to each other in consequence of 
 their common faith, a relation which shall 
 never be broken. '-Of the doctrine of bap- 
 tisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resur- 
 rection of the dead, and ofe/e;7?a/judgment," a 
 judgment the consequences of which are eter- 
 nal. It may then safely be asserted, that 
 aionios is never used in the New Testament 
 except for unlimited duration either past or 
 future. Unless some reason is assigned for 
 attaching to it a signification found no where 
 else, it is to be thus understood when applied 
 to future punishment. It is natural in this 
 place to express no small surprise, that it 
 should so often be asserted both orall v and from 
 the press, that an absolute eternity is not denot- 
 ed by aionios. It cannot be shown to have anv 
 
 Roman?, xvi. 25. Philemon, 15. Hebrews, vi. Z. 
 
 12 * 
 
130 
 
 Other sense in the whole New Testament. 
 This is its universal nieaning, unless it is to be 
 restricted when employed in reference to the 
 single subject of future punishment. And is 
 it credible, that Christ and his aj^stles use it 
 on all other topics in the endlesH^nse, and in 
 this alone to express a limited time? This 
 they must believe, who contend for the restora- 
 tion of the wicked. If, when applied to future 
 punishment, it denotes a temporary duration, 
 the evidence is to be found in the context where 
 it occurs, or in the nature of the subject itself. 
 But the subject certainly admits as possible 
 the doctrine of endless punishment. To an 
 examination of aionios in this particular ap- 
 plication, it is now proposed to attend ; which 
 will show conclusively, that no reason exists 
 for limiting its signification in these cases. 
 On the contrary, new considerations will be 
 suggested for understanding it m its original 
 and common import. These texts occur in 
 the eighteenth and twenty-fifth chapters of 
 Matthew, in the third chapter of vSt. Mark, in 
 the first chapter of the second epistle to the 
 Thessalonians, and in the epistle of Jude. 
 That in Mark was noticed while examining 
 the passages in which aiun is applied to future 
 
131 
 
 punishment. '<• But he that shall bhisphenic 
 against the Holy Ghost, hath never forgive- 
 ness, but is in danger of eternal damnation." 
 In this case, there is not only no reason for sup- 
 posing that it departs from its usual mean- 
 ing, but much, on account of the corres- 
 ponding assertion " hath never forgiveness," 
 to conclude, that it is used in an endless sense. 
 Its import is equally obvious in the following 
 construction. " Wherefore, if thy hand or thy 
 foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them 
 from thee; it is better for thee to enter into 
 life halt or maimed, rather than having two 
 hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting 
 fire. And if thine eye offend thee, pluck 
 it out, and cast it from thee ; it is better for 
 thee, to enter into life with one eye, rather 
 than having two eyes, to be cast into hell-firer 
 The two remaining instances in which it oc- 
 curs in St. Matthew, are still more decisive. 
 • Then shall he say also unto them on the 
 left hand, depart from me, ye cursed, into 
 everlasting Jire^ prepared for the devil and his 
 angels." Here aionlos may certainly bear 
 the endless sense. No intimation is given 
 why it should be limited. " And these shall 
 go away into everlasting punishment, but the 
 
132 
 
 righteous into life eternal^ It is twice used 
 in this verse, once in reference to the happi- 
 ness of heaven, and once in reference to the 
 miseries of hell. The two states are directly 
 contrasted. These shall go mvay into punish^ 
 ment eternal^ but the righteous into life eternal. 
 What can be the plea for rendering aionios 
 in one case in the endless sense, and for 
 restricting it in the other to finite duration ? 
 There can be none. The principles of inter- 
 pretation, on the contrary, require the same 
 signification in both parts of the antithesis. 
 So obvious is this, that if it most commonly 
 denotes a temporal duration, it demands the 
 the endless sense in this place. It cannot 
 express in the first clause any thing less tiian 
 eternal punishment, if it expresses eternal 
 happiness in the second. The passage in 
 the epistle to the Thessalonians, is an 
 equally explicit proof of endless punishment. 
 "When the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from 
 heaven, with his mighty angels, in flaming 
 fire, taking vengeance on them that know not 
 God, and obey not the •gospel of our Lord 
 Jesus Christ; who shall be punished with 
 everlasting destruction from the presence of 
 tlie Lord, and from the glory of his {)ower," 
 
133 
 
 Nothing requires us to limit the signification 
 of aionios in this case, rather than in others 
 where the happiness of the righteous is the 
 subject of discourse. In the epistle of Jude 
 occurs the last of these passages. " Even as 
 Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about 
 them m like manner, giving themselves over 
 to fornication, and going after strange tlesh, 
 are set forth for an example, suffering the ven- 
 geance of eternal fire.'' The writer speaks in 
 the preceding verse of the confinement of the 
 fallen ano^els in everlastino; chains, and imnix^di- 
 ately adds: — *'€ven «.«? Sodom and Gomorrah 
 #### ^^Q gg|. fQi-^i^ [qy ^^ example, suffering 
 the vengeance of eternal fire." This shows 
 that the fire, which is declared to be eternal, 
 or according to the usual sense of aionios 
 endless, is the fire of hell. As no reason can 
 be given for understanding it differently, this 
 sense must be admitted; whence the argu- 
 ment from the use of aionios appears com- 
 plete and unanswerable. It can neither be 
 said, that its common meaning, or the particu- 
 lar manner in which it is applied to future 
 punishment allow, much less require it to be 
 understood in a temporary sense. The con- 
 elusion is much more irresistible in this case, 
 
134 
 
 than when it is drawn from the signification 
 ofaion, where a contrary use may be pleaded. 
 But It has been shown, that even in that case 
 the argument is very satisfactory in favor of 
 eternal punishment. Nor can the evidence 
 be diminished, by referring to the prevaihng 
 notions of the Pharisees and Essenes on the 
 subject. They believed in eternal punishment, 
 but Christ did not surely teach it in compli- 
 ance with their prejudices. Had they been 
 in an error, instead of affording the sanction 
 of his authority, he would have warned them 
 against it. Nor is it satisfactory to say, that 
 the language is parabolic and must not be too 
 much pressed; that Christ only means that 
 men shall be judged and rewarded according 
 to their works. The language is not pressed^ 
 when it is literally interpreted, especially when 
 the connexion defines the meaning. VV hoever 
 then is disposed to admit the declaration of 
 God as certain evidence, will confess that the 
 doctrine of eternal pumshment is true. 
 
 IV. That lost men will never be restored to the 
 divine favor appears from many other explicit 
 assertions. In proof of this, I subjoin the fol- 
 lowing. 
 
 1. '^That which bearcth thorns and briers 
 
135 
 
 is rejected, and is nigh iinro rnr?in2: whose 
 end is to 1)6 hurned/' •• i'or nr.jiv u a k, of 
 whom I have told you ofieu, and tK^vv tell you 
 even weeping, that they are the enemies of the 
 cross of Christ; whose end \s destruction." 
 "And no marvel; for Satan himself is trans- 
 formed into an angel of light. Therefore it 
 is no great thing, if his ministers also be trans- 
 formed, as the ministers of righteousness; 
 wiiose end shall be according to thei** works," 
 which are surely evil. By such declarations 
 the final condemnation of the wicked, is as 
 clearly taught as it can be. Their end is to 
 be burned, their end is destruction, their end is 
 according to their works. How then can 
 their end be salvation ? To say that the end 
 here spoken of, is not their last end is an as- 
 sertion without proof 
 
 2. " The preaching of the cross is to them 
 that perish^ foohshness ; but unto us, who are 
 saved, it is the power of God.* •• A n d 
 shall utterhi perish in their own corruption." 
 " For what is a man advantaged, if he gain 
 the whole world and lose himself^ or be cast 
 ' away.''' " On whomsoever it shall fall, it will 
 
 Hebrews, vi. 8. Phillippians iii. 18. 2 Corinthians, xi. 14, 15. 
 1 Corinthians, i. 13. 2 Peter, ii. 12. Luke, ix. 25. 
 
136 
 
 grind him to powder,'''' ''For wide is the gate 
 and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruc- 
 tion,'''' " If our gospel be hid, it is hid to them 
 that are lostr Every reader of the bible 
 knows how inconsistent such huiguage is with 
 the doctrine of restoration. To be cast away, 
 lost, destroyed, rejected, is in scripture always 
 put in opposition to salvation. But where is 
 the opposition, if those who perish are to be 
 saved ? 
 
 3. " Wo unto you that are rich ; for ye have 
 received your consolation,'''' " Son, remember, 
 that thou in thy life time received thy i^ood 
 things.'''' " For I say unto you. that none of 
 those men which were bidden shall taste of my 
 supper." " He that believeth not the Son, 
 shall not see life,, but the wrath of God abidsth 
 on him." " He that is unjust, let him be un- 
 - just still ; and he which is filthy, let him be 
 filthy still." How can it be said that the rich 
 receive their consohition in this life, if they, 
 are to receive abundantly more in the next .'^ 
 How can it be said of Dives, that he received 
 iiis good thin<2;s on earth, if he is destined to a 
 I'ar richer inherilan e in heaven? How can 
 
 Matthew, xxi. 44. vii. 1:J. 2. rorinlhiuns, iv. 3. Luko, ti. 
 24. jcvi, 25. xiv. 24. John iji. 3G. iiov. xxii. ] 1. 
 
137 
 
 it be said, that those who refuse the invita- 
 tions of God to the supper of his Son, that is, 
 to celestial enjoyments, shall never taste of 
 that supper, if they are notwithstanding to be 
 saved ? How can it be said that he, who 
 believeth not the Son, shall not see life (shall 
 not enjoy the happiness of heaven) if he is 
 ultimately to escape from punishment ? How 
 can it be said, that the wrath of God shall 
 abide upon him, if it is ever to be withdrawn? 
 How can the filthy be filthy still, if they are to 
 become holy and happy? All such declara- 
 tions it must be admitted, teach eternal pun- 
 ishment. 
 
 This protracted, but I hope profitable in- 
 vestigation, is now closed. Other things re- 
 lating to the general subject, are yet to be 
 considered, but the unreasonableness of ex- 
 pecting the restoration of lost men to virtue 
 and happiness, is now made sufiicientiy appa- 
 rent. Many other passages might be named, 
 which convey the same unequivocal testimony 
 in favor of this conclusion, but unless you are 
 willing to believe the inspired declarations 
 already exhibited, you will not assent to any 
 evidence whatever. " And he said unto him; 
 — If they hear not Moses and the prophets, 
 13 
 
138 
 
 neither will they be persuaded, though one 
 rose from the dead." Indeed, what more can 
 you desire ? How various, express and 
 abundant are the proofs before you ! There 
 is scarcely any other subject in the bible, so 
 much noticed, or on which there are such ex- 
 plicit revelations. Apply the common rules 
 for interpreting language to the passages 
 which speak of the duration of future punish- 
 ment, and the conclusion that it is everlasting, 
 cannot be evaded. And why do you, my 
 hearer, refuse your assent to the doctrine ? 
 You can offer no satisfactory reason. The 
 bible makes no contradictory statements on 
 this subject. The evidence already advanced, 
 is a fair example of the manner in which the 
 doctrine is treated throughout the word of 
 God. Why then do you not believe.^ I know 
 the reason. It is an awful truth. You shrink 
 from the dreadful necessity of admitting it, as 
 you would from the sentence of death. You 
 consequently flatter yourself that it is incon- 
 sistent with the character of God. But did 
 you gain such an idea of Him, from his 
 works and providence.^ How could you.'^ 
 He allows sin and misery to exist in this world. 
 Judging of what he may do, from what he 
 
139 
 
 has done, it is surely not impossible that suf- 
 fering will never cease under his government. 
 Where then have you learned that He is 
 too good to punish the wicked ? God is in- 
 deed infinitely good — He himself asserts it. 
 But if you believe this, why will you not 
 believe when he asserts that the wicked shall 
 be punished forever? Is one of his declara- 
 tions more worthy of credit than another ? 
 But he has never informed you that he is too 
 good to inflict eternal punishment. You have 
 not learned in the bible that this is his charac- 
 ter. Where then did you obtain this extraordi- 
 nary acquaintance with your Maker ? You 
 obtained it no where. There is no such God 
 as your imagination has conceived. The 
 fact tliat you would save all men of every 
 description of character, is no evidence that 
 He will. You would restore your dying 
 neighbor to health, relieve his wife from the 
 agony of separation and his children from 
 orphanage and want ; but the most merciful 
 God decides differently, and allows disease, 
 povertv and death to fill the world with tears 
 and suffering. No benevolent man would be 
 the author of so much inisery. The unl'miad 
 knowledge of God enables him to perceive 
 
140 
 
 equity, wisdom and goodness in events which 
 no human being would imagine, without a 
 revelation, to be either kind or just. Such is 
 the nature of eternal punishment. It is an 
 order of God's government inseparable from 
 the most important interests of his kingdom, 
 and which he will maintain, however much 
 the sympathies of our frail and erring na- 
 ture may revolt at its execution. Why then 
 do you not credit the frequent and explicit 
 testimony of his word on this momentous sub- 
 ject ? What do you gain by your ceaseless 
 efforts to evade the truth, by your unprofitable 
 zeal in disseminating error? What advantage 
 have you even now, in the things whereof you 
 will one day be ashamed ? I put the question to 
 excite reflection. The condemnation to which 
 sin exposes us, may be avoided by repentance. 
 God has appointed a day in which he will 
 judge the secrets of men, by that man whom 
 he hath ordained ; on which account, he com- 
 mands all men to repent, as an adequate and 
 indispensable security against the sentence of 
 indignation and wrath. But he, who denies 
 the justice and possibility of everlasting pun- 
 ishment, makes himself ignorant of the nature 
 and tendency of sin, ignorant of his own cha- 
 
141 
 
 racter and of his God ; for he beholds not the 
 moral image of man reflected from the lake of 
 despair, and turns not with contrition and gra- 
 titude to the cross of Christ. The evidence 
 which he smothers, the light which he ex- 
 tinguishes, is essential to his pardon and eter- 
 nal peace. " Consider this, ye that for- 
 get God, lest I tear you in pieces, and there 
 be none to deliver." 
 
 13' 
 
LECTURE Vll. 
 
 THE NATURE OF FUTURE PUNISHMENT. 
 
 Matthew xxv. 30. 
 
 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer 
 darkness : there shall be iveeping and gnashing 
 of teeth. 
 
 Erroneous views and destructive prejudices 
 have extensively prevailed in consequence oi 
 misunderstanding the language of the bible 
 in reference to future punishment. Are the 
 wicked to be Hterally destroyed ? is their ex- 
 istence to terminate with this life ? are their 
 sufferings merely mental? are they to be 
 punished in flames of fire? These questions 
 which have been agitated with much interest, 
 and which have received various solutions, it 
 is the design of this discourse to answer. 
 
 I. Future punishment does not consist in annihi- 
 lation. Such a conclusion, the literal import 
 
143 
 
 of destruction, of perishing, of perdition, justi- 
 fies. '* Who shall be punished with everlast- 
 ing destruction.'' *' And shall utterly perish 
 in their own corruption." But the express- 
 ions are figurative. They do not denote an 
 abolition or annihilation of the soul, but moral 
 ruin or the destruction of character and hap- 
 piness. The same usage prevails in all lan- 
 guages. They are often said to be destroyed, 
 who are only ruined in reputation, property 
 and influence. That the literal sens.^ of such 
 terms is not applicable to future punishment, 
 appears from the distinctions which are made 
 in its degrees of severity, and from numerous 
 expressions which represent lo-t men to be in 
 a state of conscious existence. It is also found 
 from an examination of the phraseology in 
 question, that it is obviously used by the sa- 
 cred writers in a metaphorical sense. " Whose 
 judgment now a long time lingereth not, and 
 their damnation (destruction) slumbereth 
 not." The apostle refers to a punishment to 
 be inflicted at the judgment day, when God 
 will display his indignation by a marked dis- 
 tinction in its degrees of severity. " But 
 chiefly them that walk after the flesh, in the lust 
 of concupiscence and despise government/' 
 
144 
 
 Destruction occurs in the same sense in the 
 ninth chapter of Romans ; — " What, if God 
 wiUing to show his wrath and make his power 
 known, endured with much long-suffering the 
 vessels of wrath fitted to destruction." So 
 far from rendering his wrath and power con- 
 spicuous by suspending an act of annihilation, 
 God would forcibly illustrate both by an im- 
 mediate execution. But if destruction signi- 
 fies the infliction of pain, the sense is clear and 
 impressive. Through the forbearance of God, 
 the wicked have an opportunity of filling up, 
 in their voluntary and inexcusable rebeUion, 
 the measure of their iniquities and of fitting 
 themselves to be more striking examples of 
 his displeasure against sin and of his power 
 to punish It. 
 
 II. JVo phraseology of the bible exactly defines 
 the nature of future punishment. We are not ex- 
 pressly informed in what it consists. Many per- 
 sons however consider the language descrip- 
 tive of the misery of lost men as philosophical 
 definitions. We find in the history of fanati- 
 cism, women plucking out their eyes and 
 cutting off their hands in supposed obedience 
 to our Savior's command; — ^ If thine eye of- 
 fend thee, pluck it out, if thine hand or foot 
 
145 
 
 oiiend thee, cut it off.' The mind without 
 training, is prone to stop at the hteral import 
 of words, and never to take their secondary or 
 figurative sense. We speak of the future 
 world in the language of the bible and in the 
 sense of the sacred writers, not meaning that 
 hell is hterally a furnace of fire, but only that 
 its sufferings are intense. The style of the 
 language however makes the impression very 
 extensive, that the pains of hell are exactly 
 such as fire produces. Although our mean- 
 ing is frequently explained, we cannot always 
 guard against misapprehension, especially in 
 the case of transient hearers. Hence the 
 minds of ignorant men are sometimes embit- 
 tered against the truth, by the suspicion that 
 its teachers believe in the existence of a fur- 
 nace of material fire and brimstone. But 
 orthodox divines decide unanimously, that no 
 hteral and precise account of the condition of 
 lost men is given in the bible. Their reasons 
 shall now be stated. 
 
 1 . Analogy makes it probable^ that the descrip- 
 tions of future punishment are figurative. Heaven 
 is a place ineffably glorious and happy. We 
 are taught its splendor, under the similitude of 
 a city constructed of the richest materials 
 
146 
 
 and in the most magnificent style; and its 
 amenity, salubriousness and abundance, under 
 the figure of a garden irrigated by perennial 
 waters, warmed by a genial sun and yielding 
 all kinds of delicious fruits. None interpret 
 the language literally ; no one imagines that 
 any thing definite is known of spiritual ex- 
 istence or of the modes of enjoyment in 
 that world. It is a place of great glory, of 
 spotless purity and of unsullied serenity and 
 bliss; but it is not revealed how its inhabit- 
 ants receive and communicate ideas, how 
 they pursue pleasing employments, how God 
 and angels appear in immediate vision. If 
 you thus judge of the heavenly world, why not 
 apply the same rule of interpretation to 
 descriptions of the place of punishment ? 
 why not regard them as intended to convey 
 only a vivid picture of misery ? 
 
 2. Almost all that is said of future existence 
 must be in the language of approximation. '^I'he 
 invisible world cannot be described except by 
 comparison with things seen. If it is not in 
 its modes of feeling and acting like what we 
 here experience, a philosophical knowledge of 
 it is unattiiinable. 
 
 3. The nature of spiritual existence, so far ns 
 
147 
 
 it is understood, is inconsistent irifh the literal im- 
 port of the descriptions of future jnmishment. f)f 
 the organization oft he soul and of its spiritual 
 body we know nothing, except that it depends 
 not on animal attractions or is not subject to 
 the laws of flesh and blood. This negative 
 knowledge affords assurance, that the same 
 modes of pleasure and of pain will not prevail 
 in both states of existence. Bodies differently 
 constructed and under the control of different 
 laws, are not susceptible of the same sensa- 
 tions from the same causes. Fire occasions 
 pain by its chemical action in varying or'dis- 
 organizing the structure of the animal system, 
 which process cannot be predicated of a 
 spiritual body which is immortal and conse- 
 quently indestructible. 
 
 4. The same forms of description are employed 
 in reference to the dead before the resurrection while 
 in an unembodied state, '* The rich man also 
 died, and was buried, and in hell he lifted up 
 his eyes being in torments, and seeth Abra- 
 ham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And 
 he cried and said, Father Abraham, have 
 mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may 
 dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my 
 tongue, for I am tormented in this flame.'' 
 
148 
 
 Here almost every particular is enumerated^ 
 which eiiters siitotht descnpiionsottuture pun- 
 ishment. The rich man in hell is represented 
 as possessing the members, passions and 
 sensibilities of a matt- rial body and as sub- 
 jected to the action of a material element. 
 But he was not m a body, either animal or 
 spiritual, whence the representation is evi- 
 dently figurative. 
 
 5. If the language of the sacred writers in 
 reference to the sufferings of hell are literal^ they 
 are contradictory. This remarkable passage 
 in St. Mark is inconsistent with itself; — '^ And 
 if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is bet- 
 ter for thee to enter into life maimed, than 
 having two hands to go into hell, into the fire 
 that never shall be quenched : where their 
 worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.'' 
 The points of discrepancy are the worm that 
 never dies and the fire that is 7icver quenched^ 
 circumstances which cannot co-exist. The 
 description in the text is equally decisive. 
 "Cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer 
 darkness ; — there shall be weeping and gnash- 
 ing of teeth." This gives a horrible picture 
 of the lonely and dismal condition of lost men. 
 But if it is literally true, if they are actually 
 
149 
 
 m darkness, liovv can other phraseology ap- 
 pHed to future punishment be explained ? A 
 world hghted up by everlasting flames cannot 
 be a place of darkness. It is thus that we 
 infer that descriptions of heaven are figura- 
 tive. In one place God is represented as 
 dwelling in light unapproachable and full of 
 glory, and in anothci- as making darkness his 
 pavilion. These accounts are in the letter 
 contradictory, but in their real import harmo- 
 nious. They mean only that He cannot be 
 seen and fully comprehended. Thus the va- 
 rious and apparently irreconcilable accounts 
 which we have of hell, appear perfectly cor- 
 rect. They are only intended to teach that 
 the place is extremely miserable and appal- 
 ling. 
 
 III. Although a literal uccouni of the nature of 
 future punishment is ^ot given, we partly kfiow in 
 what it consists from the properties of the human 
 mind, 
 
 1 . Lost men will be harassed with discontent. 
 The love of happiness is inseparable from 
 their nature. While beholding the blessed- 
 ness of heaven and feeling a total deprivation 
 of the means of enjoyment, they will be tor- 
 mented witii ungratified desire. Dissatisfac- 
 14 
 
150 
 
 tion with existing circumstances and fruitless 
 wishes for a change which they cannot enjoy, 
 will keep them in perpetual irritation. There 
 can be nothing tranquil and serene where 
 there is nothing to allay vexation, and where 
 every thing to excite it abounds. To be 
 where all bad principles, where all unholy 
 feelings burn and rage without restraint, 
 where they are all inflamed by a sense of 
 want, and of ignominy, and by a view of the 
 blessedness of heaven, in which spirits origin- 
 ally of a nature like its own are exulting in per- 
 fect holiness, will deprive the soul of tranquillity 
 and contentment, and call every angry passion 
 into exercise. Envy, hatred and revenge, 
 which were once in their infancy and only 
 excited at interval, will gather strength from 
 free indulgence, and ^exasperation from the 
 poverty and despair of its circumstances. Its 
 desires can never be satisfied, Us malice never 
 accomplished, its revenge never satiated. 
 Such turbulence and dissatisfaction, the re- 
 ality of which is fairly inferred from the na- 
 ture of the mind, will undoubtedly contribute 
 to the miseries of lost men. 
 
 2. Recollection ivill awaken the anguish of 
 nnmtngled self-reproach^ of the most bitter regret 
 
161 
 
 atid of biting remorse. The wretched soul will 
 remember its abused sabbaths, its stifled con- 
 victions, its broken vows, its vicious practices, 
 its half formed resolutions of amendment, its 
 neglected bible and slighted opportunities, 
 with shame and dismay. Every moment, 
 which recalls such acts of folly and guilt, will 
 be replete with anguish. Then light will fall 
 on each step of probationary existence. Sins 
 before unsuspected or forgotten, will flash on 
 the mind. The justice of God will be reliev- 
 ed from suspicion. The soul will not doubt 
 that mortal life was short, its joys mean 
 and its concerns trifling, in comparison 
 with the interests of an endless existence. 
 It will stand in amazement at the folly 
 which for the honor, ease and pleasures of 
 earth provoked the wrath of God and forfeited 
 heaven. It will not recall one event or act of 
 life on which to reflect with satisfaction. The 
 past will only flash on the mind to keep open 
 an eternal wound. Endeavor to picture in 
 imagination a being cut ofl* from friendship, 
 from peace and pleasant occupation and con- 
 nned in dismal abodes, with no employment 
 but meditation on past existence, and that ex- 
 istence replete with events, at the remem- 
 
152 
 
 brance of which he is overwhelmed with 
 shame, remorse and anguish. Imagine your- 
 self in his stead, a lonely, blasted, and haggard 
 outcast, unpitied and unprotected, with no 
 subject of reflection but the crimes and follies 
 which have thus reduced you ! W hat could cre- 
 ate more exquisite suffering than the recollec- 
 tion of those deeds of madness which drew you 
 from probationary ground into utter ruin ? 
 How painful to retrace the steps by which 
 you approached the gulf of despair ! how 
 painful to remember duties unperformed, op- 
 portunities unregarded, proffered pardon of- 
 ten despised and salutary fears always 
 quelled ! 
 
 3. Despair of a better state will deprive the 
 sufferings of hell of mitigation^ and form one 
 of its most appalling circumstances. To feel that 
 their condition is unalterable, their portion 
 unalienable, that the night of darkness on 
 which they entered at death has no morning, 
 that the fire into \^hich they are banished is 
 unquenchable, that the worms which prey on 
 their spirits never die, is the dreadful doom 
 of lost men. Could ages bring them relief, 
 though wrapt in mantles of woe and lying on 
 beds of sorrow, they might wait patient) v. 
 
But no such expectation sustains them in the 
 midst of their miseries. They are no longer 
 deceived by error, no longer consoled by hope. 
 They are persuaded of the awful truth ; — as 
 the tree falls, so it lies. It is impossible for 
 us to realize this state of mind. To be involv- 
 ed in wretchedness which we know will never 
 cease, to see the frown of God, to look back 
 and forward without fixing on one object to 
 relieve, and in full expectancy of worse evils, is 
 hell. In this life we know nothing of it. Here 
 in the saddest conjunctures, w^hen every friend 
 forsakes us and every prospect lowers, we 
 look to all changing time, and hope for succor. 
 But in hell the storm never clears aw^ay, the 
 sunshine of prosperity never opens upon the 
 soul, the expectation of a brighter day is over. 
 It is not wonderful that in this state of feeling, 
 the agitated and despairing spirit should ex- 
 claim ; — 
 
 " \Vhicb way shall I fly : 
 Infinite wrath and infinite despair I 
 WTiich way I fly is hell, myself an hell; — 
 And in the lowest deep, a lower deep, 
 Still threatening to devour me, opens wide, 
 To which the hell I suffer seems a heaven." 
 
 The evil that it now experiences it could 
 14 * 
 
154 
 
 brace itself to bear, but the abysses into 
 which it must yet descend, the long tracks of 
 misery it must yet travel, the horrid convic- 
 tion it must yet so often feel that the work 
 of destruction is only now begun, makes it 
 feel that it is indeed in Hell. 
 
 4. But there are other modes of wretchedness 
 which we may justly ascribe to the inhabitants 
 of that world. The stings of conscience, the 
 gnawings of remorse, the agitations of pas- 
 sion, the bitterness of recollection and sicken- 
 ing despair, are not the only messengers of 
 wrath to execute the penalties of God's vio- 
 lated law. Sala7i and his angels and lost men 
 themselves are the executors of his will. You 
 might as well look for harmony in the abodes 
 of maddened insanity, as among spirits infuri- 
 ated by crime and anguish. If love is the 
 harmony of heaven, enmity must make dis- 
 cord in hell. The wicked are selfish ; no law 
 of benevolence binds them in communities for 
 mutual benefit, no principles of justice protect 
 them from mutual aggression. What will not 
 passion, unbridled and exasperated do among 
 the miserable victims of despjiir ? When 
 will the hatred of such beings cease, when 
 will their conflicts end, when will order be 
 
155 
 
 restored where confusion reigns, when 
 will the tumult and collision of mutual hostili- 
 ty terminate ? Who could wish a habitation, 
 who could endure even a visit in that world 
 of darkness, of despair, and of malevolence ? 
 5. But the most dreadful circumstance in 
 the sentence of damnation has not yet been 
 named. / Tnean the wrath of the Lamb. Con- 
 scious of having incurred the displeasure of a 
 just and and merciful being, the wicked must 
 look at themselves with shame, at each other 
 with scorn, and to heaven with consternation. 
 To behold the Lamb of God whom they have 
 treated with indignity, quitting the mercy seat 
 and assuming the throne of justice, to behold 
 a frown where once pity sat, to hear sounds of 
 vengeance from lips which once uttered love, 
 and to know that by their own obduracy they 
 have rendered this change necessary and 
 just, closes in a most dreadful climax all that 
 we can positively assert of their miseries. 
 From the nature of their minds and from the 
 characters which they sustain, it is probable 
 that fretful, angry and vindictive passions, pain- 
 ful recollections, fiend-like animosities, and 
 heart-chilling anticipations, conscious guilt, 
 remorse and fell despair, will form part of the 
 
156 
 
 degradation and anguish of destruction. By 
 what other means the soul will be made to 
 feel the evil of sin, and to deplore its own 
 perversity, cannot here be ascertained. Nor 
 could any important object be secured by a 
 more precise and definite acquaintance with 
 the modes of future punishment. The design 
 of revelation is to protect the law of God from 
 violation. We are therefore informed that 
 its sanctions are severe. To impress this on 
 the mind, the most terrific descriptions of the 
 world of punishment that language aflfords are 
 employed. But still they may prove to be 
 only approximations to the truth. By means 
 as yet unknown the anguish of the soul may 
 be increased beyond present conception, and 
 to a degree never expressed in words. Its 
 distress will certainly equal whatever is im- 
 plied in lying down in devouring fire and in 
 everlasting burnings. 
 
LECTURE VIII. 
 
 THE JUSTICE OF FUTURE PUNISHMEiNT. 
 Romans iii. 5. 
 
 h God unrighteous who taketh vengeance ? 
 
 The conclusions to which we have arrived 
 in the preceding lectures, are asserted to be 
 inconsistent with the justice of God. The 
 grounds on which this opinion rests, shall be 
 examined after some direct evidence is offered 
 in opposition to the objection itself 
 
 1. Eternal punishment cannot be pronounced 
 unjust^ because it is impossible to show that the 
 wicked can be made to submit to the government 
 of God. None will deny, that so long as they 
 persevere in opposition to their Maker, their 
 condemnation is perfectly equitable. It is 
 only on the supposition that they will imbibe 
 a better spirit, that their sentence can be con- 
 sidered too severe. It therefore devolves 
 
158 
 
 upon the objector to prove that the sufferings 
 of hell are disciplinary, and better adapted 
 than any means here enjoyed to subdue the 
 heart to the love and fear of God, and that 
 this will actually be the effect. This he can- 
 not do. So far as we understand the tendency 
 of punishment, it affords no reason to expect 
 repentance after death. The soul is never 
 terrified into obedience. It is indeed often 
 iniuced to seek security by the apprehension 
 of danger. But though there may be a com- 
 mencement of serious solicitude and inquiry 
 in consequence of the threatenings of God 
 against transgressors, there never was and 
 there never can be a mind softened and sub- 
 dued by fear. If a person finds himself sub- 
 jected to excruciating sufferings, and involved 
 in the fear of greater in consequence of his 
 sins, his heart rises against God, he feels 
 indignant that he should be so severely, 
 and as he thinks, so injuriously treated. 
 However powerful may be his convic- 
 tions of guilt, and however real the dan- 
 ger may appear, it is not till he has seen 
 the Lamb of God, that the stubbornness 
 of his mind begins to yield. He must have a 
 view of the love and compassion of Christ, 
 
159 
 
 before he will humbly acknowledge his sinful- 
 ness and accept of mercy. We know from 
 these facts, that persons dying in their sins 
 will have no more disposition to repent after- 
 wards than they had in this life, nor probably 
 as much. They may then feel what they here 
 anticipated, with as little beneficial effect, and 
 with more virulent opposition. Their sinful 
 preferences will probably continue with una- 
 bated strength through every step of existence. 
 It would be of no avail to proflTer them pardon 
 under the condition of reconciliation to God 
 with which they will never comply. But 
 can that punishment be otherwise than just, 
 which is rendered necessary by the obstinate 
 perversity of the sufferer ? 
 
 2. Eternal punishment cannot he pronounced 
 unjust^ since it is impossible to shoiv^ that the inter- 
 ests which sin tends to destroy and which such a 
 penalty alone can prAect^ are 7iot of corresponding 
 importance. The punishment which God inflicts 
 is always exactly proportioned to the guilt 
 of the sufferer, which is ascertained by the 
 damage done to the universe by transgression. 
 We have no measure of the evil of sin, ex- 
 cepting so far as we are acquainted with the 
 interest which it threatens to annihilate. 
 
 \ 
 
160 
 
 But it is impossible to decide, that these in- 
 terests are not of a nature to justify eternal 
 punishment, and that their protection does 
 not demand it. The welfare of the universe 
 is to be principally considered, in all the mea- 
 sures of the divine sovereignty. Minds little 
 accustomed to think, do not always perceive 
 how essential it is to intelligent creatures at 
 large, that transgressions be noticed by ex- 
 emplary punishments. Moral beings are so 
 under the control of what they consider desira- 
 ble or otherwise, that unless the apparent 
 value of unlawful pleasures is overbalanced by 
 penalties against them, they will transgress. 
 How unsuccessfully would God endeavor to 
 secure their obedience were they left without 
 one personal inducement to keep his com- 
 mandments ! Had the sanctions of the law 
 never been executed, the rebellion which is 
 now limited might have become co extensive 
 with the rational creation. We may confi- 
 dently assert, that no reformation would take 
 place, that where apostacy once began it 
 would be perpetual. Not an individual could 
 be redeemed by Jesus Christ, for no one would 
 acknowledge his guilt, no one would feel his 
 necessities, no one would sue for mercy. 
 
Itii 
 
 Since disobedience to the law of God is 
 destructive of such incalculable interests, 
 producing of itself everlasting degr dation 
 and misery, and threatening to carry ruin 
 throughout the universe, it seems indubitable 
 that eternal punishment is only an equitable 
 vindication of the law. The objector will 
 certainly find it a fruitless attempt to show, 
 that sin does not tend to destroy a greater 
 degree of happiness, than is sacrificed in the 
 eternal misery of incorrigible otfenders. If by 
 breaking the laws of God, we endanger inr 
 terests which are more valuable than our in- 
 dividual happiness, and which eternal punish- 
 ment can alone secure, sin merits such a 
 penalty. This supposition cannot be shown 
 unfounded, and consequently it is impos- 
 sible to pronounce the doctrine which we 
 have established, untrue. 
 
 3. Eternal punishment is just ^ because God will 
 execute it. It is on this ground that the apos- 
 tle replies to the interrogation ; — ^- Is God un- 
 righteous, who taketh vengeance.'^ God for- 
 bid, for how then shall God judge the world." 
 He assumes it for granted, that the wicked 
 will be punished. The obvious inference is 
 15 
 
162 
 
 that they deserve it. Men are apt to reason 
 differently. Because God is just, they infer 
 that he will not punish. The apostle, on the 
 contrary, concludes from the righteousness of 
 God, that the punishment which he has 
 threatened, and which he will inflict is just; 
 and this undoubtedly is the only correct mode 
 of reasoning. We cannot tell what God may 
 justly do in relation to human wickedness, un- 
 til he reveals his own determination. The 
 excellence of his character is so undoubted 
 that whatever he informs us will be his 
 conduct, we must conclude is fit and equita- 
 ble. 
 
 The objection to the doctrine of future 
 punishment, founded on the justice of God, 
 is therefore untenable. It cannot be proved, 
 that lost men will repent or that they are un- 
 deserving of eternal punishment, while the 
 declaration of God, that they shall sufler thus, 
 is a positive proof of its equity. 
 
 It only remains to examine the grounds on 
 ivhich the objection : ests^ and from which it re- 
 ceives its plausibility. 
 
 I. // is urged as an act of injustice to punish 
 those who never consented to be put on trial, l^ut 
 is this true ? Is consent necessary to the e\- 
 
163 
 
 istence of obligation ? The child is bound 
 to obey its paienis, thoiigli it never assumed 
 the obligation by voluntary agn^enient. Men 
 are often laid under obligations of gratitude 
 by benefits which were conferred without 
 their request, and without the possibility of 
 avoiding them. Even those who assert 
 as an objection to eternal punishment, that 
 they were put on trial without their con- 
 sent, admit that they owe certain duties 
 to God, as love, adoration and gratitude. 
 But whence does this obligation arise 
 and on what is it founded ? Did God con- 
 sult us, whether we would be objects of 
 his peculiar regard and munificence ? Did 
 we consent to be born under happy auspices, 
 in a christian country, in a land of freedom 
 and in an age of peculiar light? or were any 
 of our ordinary blessings proflTered and accept- 
 ed, before we were under obligation ? Cer- 
 tainly not. On their own principles then, the 
 argument of these men fails. If we are with- 
 out our consent under obligations to serve 
 God, we are responsible, and obnoxious to 
 punishment for disobedience. 
 
 11. Tlie manner in ivhich sin found entrance 
 into the tvorld through M^m^ is represented to be 
 
164 
 
 inco7istste7it with justice in the punishment of his 
 posterity. It is true that we stand related to 
 our first parents in a sense which effects our 
 dearest interests. '^ By the offence of one. 
 judgment came upon all men to condemna- 
 tion." But God has not treated us unjustly nor 
 unkindly. On the contrary, by passing the 
 sentence of condemnation which Adam in- 
 curred upon the whole race, He opened the 
 way for introducing the plan of redemption, 
 and for placing mankind in a better condition, 
 than that which was forfeited by the first of- 
 fence. This position appears with high pro- 
 bability to be true, from the following con- 
 siderations. 
 
 1. The posterity of Adam are in a condition 
 preferable to that ivhich they lost by his offence. 
 At first his circumstances appeared fair and 
 promising. He was the friend of God. The 
 garden was fitted up for his residence with 
 every thing to regale his senses, enlist his 
 mind and delight his heart. He had nothing 
 to fear, except the slight temptation which 
 was to test bis obedience. But amid all this 
 display of his Maker's power and goodness, 
 he fell. At the very moment when he was in 
 the lull enjoyment of his dominions, and per 
 
haps in sweet converse with heaven, the 
 tempter was laying a plot to beguile him. Thje 
 trial proved fatal. The experiment however 
 was a fair one, and shows that it is infinitely 
 dangerous for a being like man, to be placed 
 under a system of mere law. Now though 
 we are in danger, we are not in despair. But 
 had we been left under law, and exposed in 
 the same way that Adam was, being in no 
 more eligible circumstances and having no 
 more power of resistance, we should have 
 sinned without the least prospect of escaping 
 the execution of justice. We should have 
 been cast off like the fallen angels. No invi- 
 tation of mercy would have reached our 
 ears, no blood would have washed away 
 our guilt. The condition, therefore, which 
 Adam occupied and which we lost by him, 
 was one of greater danger than that in which 
 by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ we are now 
 placed. 
 
 2. A state of trial under a system of mere laiu^ 
 such as the angels and our frst parents experienc- 
 ed^ is never so desirabk as one under a system of 
 grace. 
 
 In the former case, a single offence is fatal, 
 in the latter, the vilest offender can escape. 
 
166 
 
 And even supposing it possible, that he who 
 is under law may never sin, while he who is 
 under grace has already done it, the condition 
 of the latter is most to be desired. He has 
 only to comply with the terms of the covenant 
 of grace, which terms must from the nature 
 of the case be possible, and the deadly conse- 
 quences of his sin are at once averted. But 
 when one under mere law offends, he is left 
 without hope. Nothing can save him. If, 
 therefore, it is possible, especially if it is pro- 
 bable, that he will sin, his condition becomes 
 inconceivably more dangerous than that of 
 the actual sinner, to whom pardon is proffer- 
 ed. Adam, created in the moral image of 
 God, and for sometime obedient, at last fell, 
 and had it not been for grace would have 
 perished; but Enoch, made in a fallen state and 
 guilty of actual sin, walked by faith and was 
 not, for God took him. I know, indeed, there 
 is great danger of perishing, even where grace 
 abounds. I only contend that the prospect 
 and entire opportunity of being saved, is to be 
 preferred to a state of probation, where diso- 
 bedience is possible and always fatal. This 
 o[>portunity every man under the christian 
 dispensation enjoys, but when put on trial 
 
167 
 
 with this condition — do and hve, disobey and 
 die — he might by some sudden attack of the 
 enemy be cast from the happy kingdom of 
 God into remediless ruin. 
 
 3. Had ive sustained no moral relation to Mam 
 and received from him no bad influence ivhatever^ 
 we should have been exposed to sin and probably 
 should have fallen. 
 
 Perhaps Adam only fixed the seal of cer- 
 tainty to what was otherwise highly probable. 
 If this can be proved, it will be evident that 
 Christ has advanced us to a condition vastly 
 more to be desired than that which we lost by 
 the common parents of mankind. By assert- 
 ing it, I know I take a bold position. Some 
 have even supposed, that had Adam remained 
 obedient when tempted to eat the forbidden 
 fruit, both he and his posterity would have 
 been confirmed in a state of holiness. But 
 this is a gratuitous supposition. It is not 
 taught in the word of God, it is totally without 
 support. True, the moral powers gain strength 
 by exercise, and as far as Adam himself was 
 concerned, an act of obedience would aflTord 
 evidence of his continuing loyal. But no such 
 influence could reach his posterity. Besides, 
 the whole analogy of providence is against 
 
168 
 
 this hypothesis. Adam was put on trial for 
 himself, Eve for herself, angels for themselves, 
 and wc for ourselves. We know of no moral 
 agent, except God himself, who has not 
 been tried. Even Christ was in all points 
 tempted like as we are. Indeed, I know not, 
 that trial is separable from the moral agency 
 of creatures. Place a being in circumstances 
 where he never has the slightest incitement to 
 evil, where either he has not the ability or the 
 opportunity to choose what is wrong, and his 
 conduct will be destitute both of praise and 
 blame, neither an object of censure nor com- 
 placency. Hence we must have been put on 
 probation and by our own choice have de- 
 termined for ourselves the question of happi- 
 ness or misery. Indeed whatever evidence 
 this subject admits, is entirely in the face of 
 the idea of confirmation in holiness extended 
 to us in consideration of another's obedience. 
 But that we should have probably fallen, 
 though vmaffccted by Adam, may be gather- 
 ed from several independent facts. 
 
 God has given evidence^ that he considers the 
 fall of Adam as a fair trial of what might be ex- 
 pected from his descendants should each act for 
 himself. 
 
169 
 
 As soon as Adam sinned, both he and his^ 
 posterity felt the rigour of the law. The gates 
 of paradise were closed against the whole 
 race. The procedure is no more directed at 
 him than at his unborn and unoflending off- 
 spring. When he fell as the fact declares, 
 all fell. But how does this consist with the 
 justice of God ? Plainly, because the fate of 
 Adam w^as indicative of what would happen 
 to all men, when in no more favorable circum- 
 stances and endowed with no superior pow- 
 ers. But God had done all for him which he 
 wisely could do, and of course as much as he 
 could do for other men. " What could have 
 been done more to my vineyard, that I have 
 not done in it?" The result of this trial, 
 however, was bad. Instead, therefore, of 
 subjecting us to the same fatal ordeal, God 
 passes the sentence of death upon us as well 
 as upon him. But the justice of this proce- 
 dure rests here, that Adam's trial is a fair ex- 
 periment for us ; that he did as we should 
 have done, and therefore completely decided, 
 what that would be. So God considered it, 
 HiS treatment of the affair corresponds with 
 such a supposition. To this it may be added, 
 thMt we should have been more powerfully tempted 
 
170 
 
 ivith less power of resistance than Adam had. 
 The truth of this may be disputed. 1 would 
 by no means afhrm it as demonstrable. Were 
 it so, no doubt could remain, that all men 
 would have sinned even in paradise, and unaf- 
 fected by their progenitors. The philosophy 
 of the mind makes it certain. But the argu- 
 ment which may be stated, is plausible, if not 
 entirely conclusive. The temptation of Adam 
 was a w^eak one. He took the forbidden 
 fruit to gratify an idle curiosity, not to satisfy 
 his necessities. He was in the midst of abund- 
 ance. It is, too, so far as we know, the only 
 form of temptation with which he was ever 
 assailed. Compare his case in this re- 
 spect with what, without theorizing, we may 
 suppose to be true of his posterity. They 
 were soon to be subjected to the trials which 
 result from a dense population whose interests 
 might clash, to circumstances where every 
 passion of animal nature and every power of 
 the soul might be attacked as inlets of vice. 
 It would be hard to conceive of a case, in 
 which they would be less forcibly tempted 
 than Adam was. These appeals, too, would 
 be almost as various as the objects and events 
 tvliich caught their attention. If the first in 
 
171 
 
 citement to sin did not succeed, the second 
 or the thousandth might; if an appeal to tliat 
 passion failed, an appeal to this might drown 
 the soul in perdition. In regard to our power 
 of resistance compared with Adam's, it is 
 absolutely demonstrable that it would have 
 been less. He was created a man, capable of 
 governing the lower creation, of fulfilling the 
 duties of domestic life, of knowing God and 
 engaging in his service. All this he actually 
 did. His habits of obedience, his acquaint- 
 ance with the pleasures of devotion, all that 
 he had felt and done, volunteered to sustain 
 him in his integrity. We on the other hand 
 are created infants,^ without knowledge and 
 without the advantage of fixed principles of 
 virtue and of cuhivated piety. Our minds 
 are as fragile as our bodies. We have for a 
 long time, little discrimination, little reflection, 
 little caution. We are exposed to do wrong, 
 long before we are capable of realizing any- 
 thing like the extent of the consequences. 
 All this is true, even had Adam remained 
 obedient. The conclusion is obvious. We 
 should have been eminently exposed to fall 
 although uninfl.ienced by him. It will be difli- 
 cult for anv one to show, that all of us would 
 
172 
 
 not ultimately have perished without relief, 
 had It pleased God to leave us unrelated to 
 Adam and to Christ, uninjured by one and un- 
 aided by the other. The argument is this. 
 As God by his procedure with us has shown, 
 that he considers Adam's conduct as a fair 
 criterion of what ours would have been, and 
 as the philosophy of the mind leads to the 
 same conclusion, a great portion of mankind, 
 if not all, would have sinned. All would have 
 been exposed, and those who once fell lost 
 forever. It follows, that the evil done us by 
 Adam is trivial in comparison with the bless- 
 ings which Christ has purchased with his 
 precious blood. God has treated us kindly. 
 He allowed Adam's fall to stand as ours, that 
 he might avert the miseries which he foresaw 
 we should otherwise bring upon ourselves, 
 that he might introduce a system of grace and 
 proffer pardon to all mankind. It was his 
 design to offer mercy to all, to make salvation 
 a thing optional with those who he saw would 
 otherwise be irretrievably ruined. 
 
 4. There are strong reasons for believtns^^ that 
 redeemed men will be much happier than they 
 would have been, had thrij never singled. That 
 they will have emotions, which grow directly 
 
17 3 
 
 out of their relation to Christ and which are 
 of the most delightful kind, no one can doubt. 
 They will also have views of the charac- 
 ter of God, peculiarly clear and peculiarly 
 pleasing. 
 
 On the strength of the preceding considera- 
 tions, may it not be confidently asked ; — how 
 can an objection to the doctrine of eternal 
 punishment be drawn from the manner in 
 which sin has been entailed, through the 
 apostacy of the first man, upon his descend- 
 ants ? So far from being injured by such an 
 arrangement, it becomes the means of our 
 greatest benefit, so far from perishing on this 
 account, it lays a foundation for the salvation 
 of myriads of otherwise degraded and misera- 
 ble sinners ; so far from its being unjust to 
 punish the guilty under such a system, it will 
 aggravate the condemnation of all who do not 
 reform. 
 
 HI. Eternal punishment is represented to be un- 
 just, because Godkneiv what characters nun would 
 sustain before he created them. This objection 
 proceeds on the false supposition, that the 
 foreknowledge of God is inconsistent with 
 human accountability. Were it so, it would 
 be impossible for him to create a moral agent 
 16 
 
174 
 
 or to require the homage of any creature. 
 But the persons, who offer this objection, ad- 
 mit the existence of obligation and of respon- 
 sibihty on the part of man, and the consequent 
 sinfulness of the disobedient. They admit that 
 transgression deserves punishment But how 
 does this admission harmonize with the rea- 
 son which they assign for not believing in end- 
 less punishment ? If notwithstanding the fore- 
 knowledge of God, men expose themselves by 
 sin to the vengeance of heaven, how does it 
 render the eternal duration of punishment in- 
 credible ? It certainly does not, unless it can 
 be shown that the foresight of such tremend- 
 ous consequences, would have suspended the 
 act of creation. But who knows, that the 
 system of things which God has preferred to 
 every other, does not contain these conse- 
 quences as necessary constituents, while at 
 the same time every other possible plan is at- 
 tended by worse results ? If such is the fact, 
 a foreknowledge of evils as great as are ex- 
 perienced can be no reason for refusing ex- 
 istence to the sufferers; for in that case God 
 could not bring into being that system of things 
 which supplies the greatest sum of happiness 
 and which produces the least comparative 
 
175 
 
 evil. This objection, therefore, like the pre- 
 ceding, is unsiistained and groundless. 
 
 IV. It is urged against the justice of eternal 
 punishment^ that even the most wicked men per- 
 form some actions ichich God has promised tj re- 
 munerate. This objection results from ignor- 
 ance of the extent and spirituality of the di- 
 vine law. The love of God is the ruling mo- 
 tive in all actions, which are approved and re- 
 warded. They are consequently peculiar to 
 men of piety. " So then, they that are in the 
 flesh cannot please God." " Without faith it 
 is impossible to please him." ''•The carnal 
 mind is enmity against God ; for it is not sub- 
 ject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." 
 Christ frequently declares, that whosoever 
 confers the least favor on his disciples, be- 
 cause they are such, shall in no wise lose his 
 reward ; implying, that the actions which he 
 approves, spring from religious motives, and 
 are expressions of a pious heart. According- 
 ly in an account of the last judgment, he de- 
 nies, that those on his left hand had ever per- 
 formed any acceptable service, because their 
 deeds of charity were not dictated by affec- 
 tion to him. " Inasmuch as ye did it not 
 to one of the least of these (my brethren,) ye 
 
178 
 
 abstractly considered, but on discovering an 
 agreement between the heart and the require- 
 ments of the bible. Unless an expectation of 
 heaven is thus sustained, the benevolence and 
 justice of God, are attributes full of terror. 
 They make punishment the inevitable result of 
 an unholy and impenitent life ; they extinguish 
 all hope, and fill the world of despair with 
 weeping and gnashing of teeth. No madness 
 on earth surpasses that of the unbeliever, who 
 flatters himself with anticipations of heaven. 
 God is just and good, therefore he will by no 
 means clear the guilty. His attributes are 
 pledged to maintain his law, and to protect his 
 obedient subjects by the exemplary punishment 
 of transgressors. There is nothing in his cha- 
 racter which can afford them the least prospect 
 of happiness, unless they become reconciled 
 to him. Be not deceived. To live in hope of 
 salvation without repentance and faith, is an 
 act of desperation. Abandon your fallacious 
 expectations before they abandon you, aban- 
 don them before the time elapses in which you 
 may obtain that hope wiiich is an anchor to the 
 soul, and before you awake to the horrors of 
 irretrievable disappointment. Then even the 
 divine goodness will be more bitter than 
 
i79 
 
 death. The goodness of God ! were it not 
 for that blest attribute, hell might ahnost pul 
 on colors, and deck itself in habiliments of 
 festivity. It is that which fastens on the vic- 
 tim of his own crimes, and eats hke the never 
 dying worm, and keeps in sensitive action, in 
 keen torture, every fibre of feeling. It 
 flashes on the mind the intense light of convic- 
 tion, and wakes the peal of that heavy artillery 
 of vengeance, which drives the spirits of 
 lost men from the presence of a holy God. It 
 stands to sanction and enforce the stern de- 
 cisions of justice. Then too, corruption of 
 character, become complete, will lay a founda- 
 tion for unmittigated and endless anguish. 
 Every lost soul is like the confirmed and irre- 
 claimable victim of intemperance; the lamp of 
 reason extinguished, the sensibilities of the 
 heart chilled in eternal death, the will bent to 
 a perverse and unconquerable purpose, the 
 taste most impure, the passions most turbulent 
 and vile, the appetites most base and insatia- 
 ble, and all the issues of the soul abominable 
 and foul : there is no spring of reformation 
 that can be touched, no water of purification 
 that can suffice, no restorative which can al- 
 leviate. Behold how the disease has insinuat- 
 ed itself into the fountains of his being, cor- 
 
176 
 
 did it not to me." The reason is, that ac- 
 tions, which flow from the instincts of our na- 
 ture, from the laws and customs of society, 
 and other causes distinct from an intention of 
 serving God, are destitute of an essential 
 property of true obedience. The commands 
 of God may be obeyed in their letter but not 
 in their spirit, without a wi&h or expectation of 
 gaining his favor, and without affording a sin- 
 gle expression of attachment to him ; as a 
 man may accidentally do the will of another 
 for whom he has no regard, and of whom he 
 has even no knowledge. But there is no 
 obedience in such acts — there is no design of 
 pleasing God, and no satisfaction in the pros- 
 pect of serving hinf> : in consequence of which, 
 the most amiable actions are destitute of that 
 "holiness, without which no man shall see 
 the Lord." Unbelievers do nothing which 
 entitle them to the promises, or which is not 
 justly disregarded in the decisions of the last 
 tribunal, since they never act with a design 
 and expectation of finding happiness in the 
 service of their Maker. 
 
 V. It is urged against the justice of ctenmi pun- 
 ishment, that it makes a greater ilifference in the 
 allotments of men than their slight varieties of 
 
i77 
 
 character justify. But it should be remember- 
 ed, that none are saved because they merit 
 the distmction, that none are acquitt d except 
 through faith in Jesus Christ and in virtue of 
 his intercessions. AH men deserve eternal 
 punishment. Those who renounce their sins, 
 submit to the government of God and accept 
 salvation, are advanced to unmerited honor 
 and blessedness, while all others by rejecting 
 these good tidmgs, exclude themselves from 
 heaven. The mercy of God in saving the 
 penitent, does not make the punishment of 
 the impenitent unjust, but renders its equity 
 more conspicuous by showing that salvation 
 was proffered to all mankind. 
 
 From the justice, thus made apparent in 
 the eternal condemnation of the finally im- 
 penitent, [ have one inference to make. 
 Tkat hope of heaven^ ivhich is not sustained 
 by a fair comparison betiveen the heart a}td life^ 
 and the conditions of salvation^ is altogether falla- 
 cious. Were man blameless, he might claim 
 exemption from punishment, but having once 
 sinned, it is impossible for him to escape ex- 
 cept by complying with the terms of the gos- 
 pel. Every well founded hope, therefore, de- 
 pends, not on the justice and goodness of God 
 
180 
 
 rupting all the actions of life, making him too 
 wretched to repress his agony, and too degrad- 
 ed to desire reform ! Turning from this horrid 
 representation of all who reject the gospel, be- 
 hold him who died in the faith. Sin has no long- 
 er dominion over him. There is nothing now to 
 clog his wings, nothing to weary his mind, no- 
 thing to mar his joy. How honored by the pres- 
 ence, how blest in thelove of Christ ! The God- 
 head smiles upon him ! he wears a crown of re- 
 joicing, he holds the insignia of victory, he sings 
 a new song ; — worthy is the Lamb which was 
 slain ! With these descriptions, the reality of 
 one of which we must shortly be, I entreat 
 you to abandon those hopes of heaven 
 which are not founded on a fair comparison 
 of your hearts with the conditions of salva- 
 tion. Rely no longer upon those attributes of 
 God, which instead of affording you protection 
 will make your misery certain and tremendous. 
 Expect pardon without repentance, and you 
 will soon awake to the appaUing truth, that 
 you disbelieved the plainest declarations of 
 God ; you will awake, but it will be to an una- 
 vailing wakefulness, in circumstances where 
 repentance itself can bring no relief, a cry for 
 help no remedy, in circumstances of unknown 
 anguish, of irrepressible bursting agony. 
 
«^:r f;g%ft:s^?y"'*''™'^'-34c 
 
 TO 
 
 LOAN PERIOD 
 
 LIBRARY US 
 
 This book is d ue before closing time on the lost dote stomped \ 
 
 PMP A^TAMPED BEL OW 
 
 FORM NO. DD6A 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR 
 BERKELEY, CA 9 
 
 m 
 
CDM77t.0M37" 
 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UBRARY 
 
h 
 
 "^