SOCIALIZED GERMANY SOCIALIZED GERMANY BY FREDERIC C. HOWE, LL.D. AUTHOR OP "THE CITY: THE HOPE OF DEMOCRACY," "THE BRITISH CITY: BEGINNINGS OF DEMOCRACY," "PRIVILEGE AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA," "EUROPEAN CITIES AT WORK," ETC. NEW- YORK CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 1915 COPTRIGHT, 1915, BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS Published September, 1915 PREFACE MUCH of the material for this book was ready for publication in the fall of 1914. It is the product of rather intimate knowledge of German life during the past quarter of a century. When the war broke out the manuscript was laid aside to await its ter- mination, but as the contest wore on and the ex- traordinary resources of Germany were disclosed, it seemed to me the book should be published, partly as an explanation of the efficiency of Germany, but primarily as a suggestion of a new kind of social statesmanship which our own as well as other coun- tries must take into consideration if they are to be prepared to meet the Germany whiofe -in victory or defeat, emerges from the war. For the "German peril" is only in part a military peril. It is a peace peril as well. The real peril to the other powers of Western civilization lies in the fact that Germany is more intelligently organized than is the rest of the world. The individual German receives more from society. He is better protected in his daily life. The gains of civilization are more widely distributed than they are with us. His dignity and his per- vi PREFACE sonal liberty are on a different, and from our point of view on a lower, plane than in America and Great Britain, but his daily and his hourly needs, and those of his wife and family, are better cared for. And the individual man is more efficient. He is better prepared for his work. He enjoys a wholesome lei- sure life. He is assured protection from la misere in old age. The workhouse does not await him if he falls by the wayside. It is my belief that Germany had just reached the beginning of her greatest achievements. Had not the war intervened, the next generation would have seen her competitors in industry, trade, and com- merce outdistanced at an accelerated speed that would have soon left them far and possibly perma- nently in the rear. If this is to be averted, new ideas of the obliga- tions of the state must animate our legislators. There must be an abandonment of the old concep- tion that the only business of organized society is to protect the individual from domestic and foreign aggression. There must be a wide extension of pub- lic ownership, a greater control of the aggressions of privilege and property, a big programme of social legislation, a change in our system of education, and the exclusion of privileged and business interests from the long ascendancy which they have enjoyed PREFACE vii in our political life. It required the war to make this clear to Great Britain. It should shake us from our complacency as well. I desire to acknowledge the invaluable aid re- ceived in the preparation of this volume from the works of William Harbutt Dawson, whose books, "The Evolution of Modern Germany," "Industrial Germany," "Social Insurance in Germany," and "Municipal Life and Government in Germany," offer mines of information as well as a sympathetic in- terpretation of the constructive political and social statesmanship of that country. I am also indebted to Miss Gertrude Borchard for valuable assistance and research in the collection of material and its preparation for publication. FREDERIC C. HOWE. NEW YORK, September, 1915. CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY THE DUAL GERMANY 1 II. THE BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY ... 8 III. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 24 IV. THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE . . 36 V. RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 52 VI. THE THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM . 80 VII. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 95 VIII. CANALS, WATERWAYS, AND FREE PORTS .... 121 IX. HARBORS AND RIVER SHIPPING 133 X. MINES, FORESTS, AND AGRICULTURAL LANDS . . 146 XI. THE ATTITUDE OF GERMANY TOWARD THE SOCIAL PROBLEM 161 XII. CARING FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 172 XIII. LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL COURTS 182 XIV. SOCIAL INSURANCE AND SOCIAL DEMOCRACY . . 192 XV. HIGHER EDUCATION PROVIDING THE EXPERT . . 208 XVI. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION 220 XVII. VOCATIONAL EDUCATION PREPARING THE CHILD FOR LIFE 231 XVIII. SANITATION AND HEALTH 248 XIX. THE WAB UPON DISEASE 258 ix x CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE XX. GOVERNING CITIES BY EXPERTS 265 XXI. MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 280 XXII. THE BUILDING OF CITIES 298 XXIII. MUNICIPAL LANDOWNERSHIP AND HOUSING PROJ- ECTS 313 XXIV. THE GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE . . . 321 INDEX . , 337 SOCIALIZED GERMANY CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY THE DUAL GERMANY THIS is not an apologia pro Germania. It is not a defense of militarism nor a glorification of the Prus- sian idea of the state. Nor is it a plea for socialism, although the experience of Germany disproves many of the arguments against the possibility of a social- ist state. I am one of those who still believe that with special privileges abolished and industrial freedom assured, society would realize an approach to economic justice that would exclude the necessity of socialism. And I believe in democracy, and all that democracy implies. Germany has adopted a mixed programme, a programme of state socialism which insures a large degree of industrial freedom. It is not the socialism to which the Social Democratic party aspires; it does not involve control by the working classes. It is the socialism of the ruling caste, the great estate owners and the capitalists. And it is through state socialism that efficiency as well as a large measure of freedom has been secured. With many other Americans I have an affection for the German people, for the orderliness, finish, and perfection of administration that makes for 2 SOCIALIZED GERMANY personal comfort and convenience. I like the Ger- man cities, and have affectionate memories of Munich, Dresden, Diisseldorf, Frankfort, and Nu- remberg, with their generous provision for art, drama, music, and the cultural things of life. I have a veneration for the traditions and glories of the principalities and free cities that existed for cen- turies as autonomous states prior to the organiza- tion of the empire. I have unbounded respect for the German educational system, for the universities, for the wonderful elementary, vocational, and high schools, as well as for the technical colleges for training in industrial arts, in commerce and admin- istration. I admire the far-seeing legislation for the protection of the worker from the costs of industrial and urban life, the social measures promoted by Bis- marck, and the many municipal services like town- planning, municipal ownership, and the other public activities that explain in large measure the charm of the German city. The following chapters are an attempt to under- stand the conflict between these achievements and the things we do not like in Germany; they are an endeavor to explain the militarism and the human- ity, the paternalism and the large degree of freedom which paternalism has secured to all classes. It is an attempt to understand Germany at work as well as at war; to portray the background which in large measure explains the military efficiency of the em- THE DUAL GERMANY 3 pire. And I have tried to write the book as though there were no war. And the underlying fact about Germany is that the old Germany of a score of independent states has been submerged by the new Germany of Prussia. For Prussia is Germany, and Prussia in turn is feudal. The confusion we feel about Germany is traceable to the fact that much of the beauty and charm of old Germany has been crushed under the heel of the feudal autocratic caste which under constitutional forms has projected its ideas into the very life of the empire. It is a Germany that has lost much of the individuality, much of the freedom, and much of the liberalism of a century ago, for which has been substituted a commercial and landed feudal- ism having for its foundations the political and so- cial concepts of an earlier age. We may deplore the Prussianizing process but at the same time admit that there is much that is won- derful in the structure that has been erected during the past generation ; a structure like that of ancient Rome in the institutions that have been created, and the big-visioned ideas of legislation, of educa- tion, and of social activities that have been given to the world. These ideas will only be ignored by those who will not see. And it will be an unfortu- nate thing for the nation that refuses to see. For once the war is over, the pace for industrial suprem- acy will be fierce and rapid. The race for recovery 4 SOCIALIZED GERMANY will be to the strong and well-equipped. And there is no doubt but that Germany will turn from war to peace with much of the preparedness that she turned from peace to war. Her state-owned rail- ways and waterways, her mines and mineral re- sources, her shipping and other commercial agencies, with the highly trained men at her command, will respond to an electric button when the treaties of peace are agreed upon, and her mills, factories, and workshops, her financial resources and credit agen- cies, will respond to the imperial will just as did the armies which were set in motion by the mobilization orders in the summer of 1914. I have no doubt but that to-day, in the midst of encircling wars, Ger- many is making ready for peace, and the problems then to be met, just as for a quarter of a century she has been preparing for war. And just as France and England found themselves unprepared on the battle line, so they, and possibly America, will find themselves equally unprepared for the new struggle when the war is over. And whatever we may think of German milita- rism, of German autocracy, of German Kultur, the fact remains that Germany has developed wonderful efficiency, not only in the production of wealth, but in the distribution of the advantages of civilization as well. There is efficiency in transportation, scien- tific thought to every process and every social and industrial problem; there is the greatest concern for THE DUAL GERMANY 5 human life, for health and well-being, for the educa- tion and training of workers, artists, commercial men, and scientists, and the co-ordination of the individual into a machine of national rather than purely per- sonal dimensions. All Germany, in fact, acts as a unit. The individualism of England and America does not there exist. There is an official realization that the division of labor is no longer confined to a single establishment; it is nation-wide in its scope. Along with this is the conviction that many things must be done by the state to insure a free field for industry; to guarantee to every man a fair chance to realize upon his abilities and his powers. All of this is of especial significance to America at the present time. Our public domain is gone. A great part is held out of use. Opportunities in the West are closed forever. Our unbounded resources have been appropriated. Monopoly has closed many industries to effective competition. The means of transportation are in private hands. Financial credit is still largely a matter of personal favor. And credit is still monopolized, as are the raw materials of production. Unemployment is chronic. It is likely to increase rather than diminish, for the op- portunities for labor are under the control of the few. The city, the state, and the nation are still largely police agencies rather than agencies of ser- vice. Public officials are still animated by the individual- 6 SOCIALIZED GERMANY istic laissez-faire philosophy of an earlier generation, and as a consequence the public service is negative in its ideals, while the men who are attracted to it are untrained to constructive effort. Of skilled admin- istrators with social vision, there are comparatively few, while the universities and the schools offer but little training in this field. There is no big state- craft, no commanding idea of statesmanship, and only grudging social legislation. Instead we have the struggle of economic groups, each seeking to promote a programme of narrow class interest. Many of these problems have been worked out by Germany in a thoroughgoing way. Administrative and industrial efficiency are a scientific study in which hundreds of thousands of the best minds of the state are engaged. The same is true of com- merce and trade. The rest of the world is a quarter of a century behind Germany in social conscious- ness, in an understanding of the new statecraft, in appreciation of the necessity for social legislation, and for adjusting education in all of its branches to life. Germany has given a new conception of the state to the world. It may not be a beautiful conception. It certainly violates our ideas of personal and polit- ical freedom. But at least the idea is a successful one. It is in harmony with modern industry, and finds its counterpart in the trusts, the syndicates, and the ideas of scientific production with which we THE DUAL GERMANY 7 are familiar. Germany is a recrudescence of the Greek idea of the state adjusted to twentieth-cen- tury conditions. It is a state that thinks primarily in terms of the ruling class; but it thinks as well in terms of the whole population. Politically Germany is an oligarchy, but an oligarchy concerned about the well-being of the people, about their health, educa- tion, comfort, and efficiency. And viewed from this standpoint, Germany is a democratically minded country. It is a state organized on the ideals of Frederick the Great, but guided by the scientific ideas of the twentieth century. It is a feudal state with the view-point of benevolent paternalism. And the result of this policy has been efficiency, power, and a high average of well-being, coupled with ad- ministrative control of the lives, thoughts, and liberties of the people. CHAPTER II THE BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY WITH all of the books that have been written on the subject, Germany still mystifies us. She evades Anglo-Saxon analysis. She differs from other coun- tries in the most unexpected ways and challenges most of our theories of politics. We find difficulty in understanding the psychology of the people, their attitude toward the war, the Kaiser, and the ruling classes. There are many other anomalies that the Anglo-Saxon, and especially the American mind, cannot explain. Governed by an almost feudal aristocracy with a detachment and disdain for all other classes, Germany has worked out the most elaborate programme of social legislation and state socialism of any country in the world. Admit- tedly a people with but little aptitude for politics in the common acceptation of the term, the states and cities have perfected their administration and carried government ownership beyond the pro- grammes of any except the extreme socialists of other countries. Oppressed by the anti-socialist laws of Bismarck, there has grown up the most highly or- ganized revolutionary type of socialism in Europe, with a total vote of over 4,000,000 electors. Up to 8 BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 9 1870 almost exclusively an agricultural nation, Ger- many has developed her resources, diversified her industries, expanded her trade and commerce, and pushed herself to the front rank as an industrial power in the face of the almost complete occupa- tion of the markets of the world by other countries. These are but suggestive of the many political and social riddles which Germany presents. These are some of the anomalies which challenge the teachings of history and our currently accepted theories of politics. What is the explanation of the German people? What lies back of the prowess of the nation not only in war but in the arts of peace as well? By what means has a peasant country been able to project its life into industry, commerce, and finance, and extend its conquests into every corner of the earth? How has an autocratic state, the most autocratic in western Europe, been induced to think in terms of the peasant and the artisan, and to provide social insurance and education, state socialism and protection for the weaker members of the state, far beyond any programme yet de- veloped by any of the democratic nations of the world? What is the social psychology of the Ger- man people that apparently denies the materialistic interpretation of politics enunciated by socialists and largely confirmed by the contemporary experi- ences of other countries? 10 SOCIALIZED GERMANY A people cannot be analyzed in a few paragraphs, and cannot be understood by an outsider even with the most sympathetic of intentions. It is difficult to understand one's own country the changes in sentiment and conviction, the swift abandonment of one position tenaciously held for another. Even in America the political and social currents elude us. And the social psychology of Germany is par- ticularly baffling. It has confused even the students, artists, and travellers who during the last generation have gone to Germany for an education, for cultural things, and the leisure life which Germany offers. Possibly the most important influence in the mak- ing of modern Germany and in moulding the mind of the nation is the persistence even down to present times of the feudal idea of the state with its eight- eenth-century relation of classes. The German people, especially the Prussians, still think in terms of an earlier age; they accept the divine right of kings and the only less divine right of the feudal aristocracy to rule. And they accept this with but little intellectual protest. Up to a generation ago there were but two classes in Germany: the feudal estate owners and the peasants working upon the soil, whose relations had not materially changed in centuries. The great feudal estates still persist in Prussia, and a quasi-feudal system is the economic mould of Germany. It is this that is responsible for caste, for the division into classes; it is this BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 11 that explains the social cleavage and the accep- tance of authority. It is this, too, that explains the paternalism of Prussia, just as it is the wide distri- bution of the land under peasant proprietorship that explains the gemutlichkeit of South Germany. Feudal conditions have projected the traditions of an earlier age down to the present day. They are responsible for the autocratic power of the Bang of Prussia, who remains a great landlord, the first among other great landlords. His possessions have been in the Hohenzollern family for centuries. The Mark of Brandenburg, extended by force of arms into the kingdom of Prussia and later under Bis- marck into the empire, is an expansion of the feudal state. The constitution of 1871 is a legal crystalli- zation of eighteenth-century conditions, as is the earlier constitution of Prussia. While suggesting parliamentary forms, in reality they but legalize, through the limitations upon the suffrage, the un- just distribution of seats and the ascendancy of the feudal class, the control of the old aristocracy in the life of the nation. And this old feudal class is the ruling class. It fills all the higher offices of the state. From it come the chancellors and ministers of the empire. It officers the army and navy. It moulds public opin- ion and controls legislation. The feudal class is society. But this class is not Germany. It has little interest in or appreciation of the Germany 12 SOCIALIZED GERMANY which many Americans know and love. And we cannot understand Germany without understanding this duality. The confusion we feel, the mental conflict of so many people, is traceable to the fact that there are two Germanys: the Germany of poli- tics, militarism, and aggression, and the Germany of culture, sweetness, efficiency, and life. Official, feudal Germany is separate and apart from the real Germany. The voice of the class which rules is not the voice of the people. It does not represent the worker, the peasant, the merchant, or even the great majority of the property-owning classes. It is this persistence of an earlier organization of society that explains the sense of dependence on the part of the people, and the respect and veneration for authority which affects all classes. No other nation has so completely subordinated the individual to the state; nowhere does such unchallenged author- ity attach to so large an official class; and nowhere does the official command such unquestioned obedi- ence. There are two explanations for this persistence of the mediaeval idea of the state an anachronism in the twentieth century. In the first place the French Revolution did not penetrate into Prussia as it did into Italy, Belgium, South Germany, and even Scandinavia. Prussia was sparsely settled. There were few cities, and the system of feudal landowner- ship was too nearly universal for the revolutionary BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 13 forces to gain a footing. Nor did the later revolu- tionary movements of the nineteenth century pene- trate into that part of Germany that lies to the east of Berlin, into East Prussia, Posen, and Pomerania. And when the constitution of Prussia was formed the liberal forces were too weak to make their in- fluence felt. The constitution then adopted was merely a recasting in legal form of the old feudal order. There was no provision for direct universal suffrage or even an approach to it, for a responsible ministry, or for real constitutional forms. Later, when Prussia became the dominating state in Ger- many, she impressed her feudal will and control by the feudal classes upon the imperial constitution. Manhood suffrage, it is true, was provided in elec- tions to the Reichstag, but this is only a semblance of popular power. The King became the Kaiser, and along with the Bundesrat, or Senate, the final repository of authority. There is no suggestion of popular control over the government, and popular opinion does not influence the ruling classes. Even in the Prussian cities the great majority of the peo- ple have but little voice. Politically Germany is but little changed from what it was a century ago, and the explanation is to be found in the fact that the traditions of the people and the constitution of the state repose the government in the hands of the great landowners, who remain almost as powerful as they were in an earlier age. 14 SOCIALIZED GERMANY A second explanation of the persistence of the feudal state and the eighteenth-century relation of classes is found hi the fact that the industrial revolu- tion did not reach Germany until very recently. The factory system with a large industrial urban population dates back to the Franco-Prussian War. It was almost a century old in Great Britain before it appeared in Germany. In the former country it had built great cities and created a powerful financial class, which insisted on political and social recognition, and through its influence on legislation and public opinion it put an end to much of the personal and political subjection of earlier times. The new commercial aristocracy broadened the suffrage as early as 1832. It abolished the rotten- borough system, which still prevails in Prussia. It repealed all limitations on admission to the Com- mons, and in 1910 it took away the veto from the House of Lords. Freedom of conscience, of speech, and of the press were guaranteed, and these are of the very essence of popular government. The ministry was made responsible, not to the King, but to Parliament and the party in power. Far more important, the commercial classes became rich and powerful a generation before they appeared in Prus- sia. The members entered Parliament. They married into the old aristocracy. And, one by one, they took away the privileges of the old feudal class. Through the growth of industry England became BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 15 predominantly an industrial and trading nation, until to-day four-fifths of her people live in cities. And through manhood suffrage industry became articulate in legislation. It broke down the old feudal concepts of the state and changed the psy- chology of Great Britain. A new aristocracy was elevated alongside of the old landed aristocracy, and in securing political equality for itself it secured equality for the rest of the people as well. In Germany, on the other hand, the old regime was crystallized into constitutional form long before the commercial classes had risen to prominence in the empire. The commercial aristocracy is of recent appearance; it has never been admitted to the old aristocracy, and under the constitutions of Prussia and the empire it has but little voice in the affairs of the nation. The second influence in the moulding of modern Germany is the complete ascendancy of two power- ful individuals who have dominated the life of the nation for over fifty years. These individuals are Prince Bismarck and William II. And these two men were consistent in their ambitions and alike in their traditions. They had the same vision of the paternal state. And both reflected the ideals of an earlier age. Bismarck came from the ruling classes, the aristocracy. He loved Prussia and his King. And he loved only less the Junker class from which he came. He was trained to statecraft, and just as 16 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Stein and Hardenberg were entrusted with power following the humiliation of Prussia by Napoleon, so Bismarck was given almost sovereign authority by William I in the years prior to the Franco- Prussian War, as well as in the period of construc- tion which followed it, when the results of military conquest and the French milliards were made the basis of a political, industrial, and social programme that has been carried on since Bismarck's retire- ment by Emperor William II. These two men have guided the destinies of Ger- many. They framed constructive legislation and directed the state in the same general direction. Both were possessed of boundless imagination as to the ultimate destiny of the German people. They were not seriously distracted by political con- troversy. They ruled by party coalitions when that was possible; and when it was not, they ruled without parliamentary sanction. Their control over Prussia was absolute, and through Prussia their control of the empire was almost equally so. They chose their own associates, and they chose them from the feudal class. And they fashioned Germany to their liking, not for military purposes alone but for industrial and commercial aggression as well. The legislation which they promoted, even the social legislation for the protection of the working classes, was in har- mony with the early traditions of Prussia. The laws they insisted on involved no violent break with the BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 17 past. Rather they were a continuation of the pa- ternalism, of the feudalism, of the ascendancy of the state over the individual, to which Germany had long been accustomed. A third influence in the making of Germany is education an education which begins with the cradle, that is compulsory, and is open even to the poorest, who are able to make their way through the secondary schools, the academies, technical col- leges, and the university, if they have the ambition and the ability to do so. Nowhere, not even in America, is university training so universal as in Germany; and nowhere are there fewer obstacles to cultural opportunity. Moreover, education is a matter of the most serious official concern by states- men and experts. It is adjusted to every activity, to every industry, and every scientific need. And it is a public rather than a private function. The appropriations for this purpose are generous. The standards of elementary education are prescribed by law, to which all communities must conform. Elementary education is obligatory. Above the minimum requirements prescribed by the state local authorities may go as far as they choose, and the greatest diversity exists in the development of higher education not only between the universities, which are found in almost every state of the empire, but among the municipalities as well. Cities main- tain a great variety of high schools and academies, 18 SOCIALIZED GERMANY in which provision is made for all kinds of mechan- ical, vocational, and artistic study. There are gymnasia for classical training, for science, for the fine arts. In addition, the larger cities maintain colleges of commerce and technology, through which thousands of students are trained for industry, commerce, and state activities. There are 21 uni- versities, with 66,000 students, giving higher post- graduate degrees in philosophy, law, and medicine, and a dozen technical colleges, with 17,000 students pursuing similar advanced courses in engineering and science. Provision is made for training in state- craft and administration. Diisseldorf has a col- lege of city administration and Berlin a college of town-planning, while Frankfort has recently opened a municipal university planned on an ambitious scale. There are numerous technical colleges and laboratories for mining, architecture, forestry, and agriculture, and hundreds of industrial and vocational high schools. And these educational institutions are all closely identified with the state. Their pro- fessors and scientists co-operate with the civil and military authorities, while the civil servant is everywhere trained to meet the needs of adminis- tration and statecraft. Education, in fact, is a pre- requisite of admission to the higher positions in the civil service, while the universities and technical schools are consciously allied with the administra- tion of the empire. BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 19 Education in Germany, from the primary school to the higher endowments for scientific research, is an adjunct of the state, not an isolated, detached thing. And it is consciously organized to promote efficiency. A large part of Germany's industrial achievement is traceable to the system of educa- tion, just as her international trade is traceable to the commercial colleges, in which thousands of men are trained for the conquest of the trade of the world. Official and industrial Germany is a product of the trained administrator. Education has had a profound influence on the development of the past generation. It has made Germany a land of experts. All of these influences have reacted upon one another. Obedience is a product of feudal tradition as is the universal ambition for state service which affects all classes. Education gave the Kaiser and the civil service a body of highly trained men, de- voted to the Fatherland and condemned by the pressure of competition to a calling chosen early in life. Education supplied industry with scientific assistants and millions of trained hands and brains, prepared from childhood for a definite calling. A respect for authority, coupled with a constitution that legalizes autocratic power, made it possible for the Kaiser to carry through a colossal internal pro- gramme, even against the temporary wishes of the nation. There was no responsible ministry to check his will and no popular party to be satisfied, while 20 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the press and discussion were under the strictest surveillance. Intelligent leadership, an overcrowded scientific class, a wonderful system of trade educa- tion, and a people trained by generations to respect authority combined in the building of a nation that in a generation's time has become one of the most powerful in the modern world. All of these influences combined to make the mind of modern Germany what it is, to create a psychology quite different from that of two genera- tions ago, quite different from that of any other nation in Europe. Still other influences contributed in the same general direction. The traditions of a patriarchal feudal state made it easy for Bismarck to carry through his programme of state socialism. The universities and public opinion accepted with- out protest the taking over the railways, the develop- ment of canals and waterways, and the acquisition of mines and other industrial properties. State socialism fell in with the traditions of the state, with the will of the governing classes, as well as the opin- ions of the academic world. For had not the state owned great landed possessions and forest preserves for centuries and operated them at a profit ? Legis- lation in the interest of the working classes, the old age, sickness, and accident insurance schemes were all part of the traditions of an earlier age and found a sanction in similar activities promoted by the Great Elector and Frederick the Great. New Ger- BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 21 many accepted state socialism just as it accepted interference with the lives and property of the indi- vidual by the state. It was in harmony with the tra- ditions of the people. And state socialism has reacted on the people. It has not only increased their dependence on the state; it has created affection for the state as well. One explanation of the devotion of the German people to the Fatherland is the devotion of the Fatherland to the people. This is a most important factor in the psychology of modern Germany, a factor that has been generally overlooked. We in America find this difficult to comprehend. For with us the state performs but few services for the citizen. Our political philosophy permits every one to do pretty much as he pleases. Neither the nation, the States, nor the cities engage in many positive helpful activities. Germany has the other point of view. The common good is a matter of constant concern, and the state is the greatest of all agencies of service. More than 3,000,000 persons are in civil service. This is one person out of every twenty. And state positions are highly prized. They carry dignity, social position, permanent tenure, and a pension on retirement. These em- ployees and those dependent on them believe in the Fatherland and all that it stands for. It is their whole life to an extent that is difficult for us to understand. In addition, and this is very impor- 22 SOCIALIZED GERMANY tant, the state looks after the individual in count- less ways. It serves him all the time. The service is of a paternal sort, it is true, but it is satisfactory to the German people. And this in turn creates a reciprocal love on the part of the people for the state. In addition they have a sense of common ownership in the railroads, the telegraph, the mines, forests, and the agricultural estates. There are insurance funds which provide against accident, sickness, and invalidity, as well as the old-age pen- sions. If a citizen lives in a city, as 49 per cent, of the people do, he is a joint owner of the street rail- ways and gas, water, and electric-lighting plants, as well as numerous other activities which touch his life in many ways. He is educated in the public schools; the teacher, the health officer, and even the relief committees come to him as aids to his am- bition and his well-being. Even the taxes are ad- justed so as to fall most heavily upon those best able to bear them. For the bulk of the revenues of the cities and a large part of the revenues of the state come through the income tax, a tax that is paid directly and that is consciously felt by the payer. The payment of direct taxes in turn creates an interest in the state and its many activities. And nowhere in the world do people pay taxes with more willingness than in Germany. The devotion of the German people in the pres- ent struggle is far more than a feudal tradition. It BACKGROUND OF MODERN GERMANY 23 is not inspired alone by fear or coercion or venera- tion for authority. Rather it is largely a product of the action and reaction of the state upon the daily lives of the people. The psychology of Germany has a strong economic as well as a historical back- ground. The state may not be dedicated to a good cause, and it may be mistaken in its conception of the value of German Kultur to the world. But the people have been so indissolubly merged into the state, so identified with it by tradition, education, and the common ownership of so many things that there has been created a social psychology that is unique in the history of the modern world; a social psychology, too, that is so different from anything with which we are familiar that it is difficult, if not impossible, for us to comprehend the conflicting meanings which Germany presents to the world. CHAPTER III THE CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE WILLIAM I became King of Prussia in 1861. He appointed Bismarck as his chancellor and entrusted him with large powers. Bismarck loved his King and his Prussia. He had no sympathy with democ- racy, with socialism, or with representative institu- tions. And with the approval of his master he pro- ceeded to weld North Germany into a federation and later into an empire under the leadership of Prussia. This was his overmastering idea, and from the very beginning he seems to have had a vision of the Germany of to-day under the dominion of Prussia and the Hohenzollerns. In the process of empire-building his method was one of "blood and iron." In 1864 Prussia and Aus- tria made war on Denmark and annexed the duchies of Schleswig and Holstein. Prussia took Schleswig and Austria Holstein. Two years later Prussia occupied Holstein under a pretext which led to war with Austria, a war for which Bismarck had been preparing for years. A single battle sufficed for the humbling of Austria, and Prussia annexed Holstein and also Hanover, Hesse, Nassau, and the free city 24 CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 25 of Frankfort-on-the-Main, which had sided with Austria in the struggle. This was done to round out Prussia. It made her ascendant in the new North German Federation, which was formed in 1867 under the hegemony of Prussia. The Prussian par- liament protested that force was not an adequate justification for the annexation of independent states, to which Bismarck replied: "Our right is the right of the German nation to exist, to breathe, to unite; the right and duty of Prussia to give to the German nation the foundation for her existence." The war with Austria made Prussia supreme in Germany. No humiliating terms were imposed upon Austria, nor was any territory exacted in the treaty of peace. Austria was needed as a potential ally in case of war with France. Following the war a constitution was adopted, under which Prussia became the ascendant force in the North German Federation. The King of Prussia was made per- manent president. There was an upper house made up of delegates from the individual states and a lower house elected by universal suffrage. Into this federation the larger states of the south, Ba- varia, Baden, Wurtemberg, and Hesse-Darmstadt, refused to enter. The war with France followed shortly after. It converted the North German Federation into the German Empire, made up of twenty-five sovereign and semi-independent states and Alsace-Lorraine, 26 SOCIALIZED GERMANY which were voluntarily or forcibly united under a written constitution. In the formation of this union the people of the several states were not con- sulted. Bavaria, Baden, Wiirtemberg, and Hesse- Darmstadt, which had previously stood aloof, were now incorporated into the empire. Under the constitution adopted at Versailles the King of Prussia is permanent Emperor. As King of Prussia he has almost autocratic power over three-fifths of the empire, but as German Emperor his powers are defined by the constitution. Certain limitations were placed upon his powers as a neces- sary concession to the smaller kingdoms, which were loath to lose their sovereign independence. Still the powers of the Kaiser are very great. He is commander-in-chief of the army and the navy and minister of foreign affairs as well. With the consent of the Bundesrat (or council of delegates from the Kings and princes of the federated states) he can declare war and serve execution against any of the federal states when ordered to do so by the Bundes- rat. He summons and dissolves the sittings of the Reichstag, with the consent of the Bundesrat. He appoints the chancellor and all other higher cabinet officials, who are his personal representatives. There is no semblance of parliamentary control over the ministry or of responsible party government, such as prevails in England, France, Italy, and other constitutional monarchies. Neither the chancellor CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 27 nor the ministry resigns in the face of a vote of lack of confidence. They are not changed upon an ad- verse election. Neither do they necessarily come from the majority party. The chancellor is such by grace of the Emperor rather than by virtue of any popular selection. He presides over the de- liberations of the upper chamber, is the fountain- head of much legislation and has the right, which he constantly exercises, of appearing and speaking in the Reichstag. By these provisions the King of Prussia enjoys almost as great powers in the empire as he does in Prussia. He has back of him the sup- port of his own state, the control of the army and the navy, and the appointment and recall of all of the ministers of the empire. The power of the Kaiser as well as the influence of Prussia has been greatly strengthened by the personality of the present Emperor. The confedera- tion has become a nation in every sense of the word. The particularism of the individual states of a generation ago has been succeeded by a sense of solidarity which has closely knit the people into a nation. The laws of Bismarck contributed greatly to this end, as has the phenomenal industrial progress of the past generation. Just as Alexander Hamil- ton moulded the thirteen colonies into a nation by his tariff and internal revenue policy, by the national bank act, by the nationalization of the debt, and the location of the capital at Washington, so Bismarck 28 SOCIALIZED GERMANY and later William II cemented the twenty-five sepa- rate states which form the empire into an indissoluble union, in which Prussia is supreme. The federation of a generation ago has become a nation. The ascendancy of Prussia is further assured by her place in the Bundesrat or Senate of the empire. This is really a council of ambassadors from the twenty-five kingdoms, principalities, and free cities which comprise the empire. The members are not elected by the people; they are appointed by the rulers of the individual states. The vote of each state is cast as a unit and under instructions from the states which the delegates represent. In the Bundesrat Prussia has 20 out of 58 votes, her quota having been increased from 17 by contracts made with smaller states subsequent to 1871, by which they relinquished their representation. Only 14 votes in the Bundesrat are required to defeat any proposed change in the constitution, so that Prussia has more than enough votes to prevent any curtail- ment of her power. By these provisions the sover- eignty of the other states has been relinquished or forcibly taken away by Prussia. Politically, at least, Prussia is Germany, although some of the trappings of sovereignty remain with the constituent states. The Reichstag is the popular chamber of the imperial parliament. It was a concession to the liberal element of the nation, which had been agitat- ing for a constitution since 1848. It is an escape CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 29 valve for public opinion and little more. It offers a forum for discussion and as such exerts real in- fluence, but it has never been really democratic in its personnel, and under the constitution it has little real power and authority. It is the only body in Germany, however, that is elected by manhood suffrage. This explains the large Socialist represen- tation which it contains. Here alone have the Social- ists been able to secure an effective representation in politics. Members of the Reichstag are elected for five years by direct universal suffrage and a secret ballot, members being chosen by districts. But even if the Socialists or radical parties controlled the Reichstag, they would be impotent to carry out their policies, for they could not impose their will on the Bundesrat or the Emperor; they could do nothing to alter the constitution, and they could not estab- lish the cabinet or responsible-ministry system which is of the essence of parliamentary government. The chancellor, appointed by the Emperor, has the right to appear in the Reichstag to urge govern- ment measures. The Reichstag can do as it wills with the chancellor's proposals, but, whatever its action, it does not affect the position of the chan- cellor, who is responsible to the Emperor alone. If the Reichstag becomes too refractory, he may cause it to be dissolved, and a new election ordered on issues of the chancellor's choosing. This was done 30 SOCIALIZED GERMANY by Bismarck after the attempts on the life of Em- peror William I. It has been done on subsequent occasions. The power of Prussia through the King, the chan- cellor, and the Bundesrat is further strengthened by her preponderating representation in the Reichstag, where she has 235 members out of 397. Even in the popular branch of the government Prussia is supreme. No coalition of all the other states could overcome her control. The distribution of seats in the Reichstag is almost as unfair as in the Prussian parliament. Electoral districts have not been changed since 1871, when Germany was almost exclusively agricultural. Dur- ing the intervening years great cities and industrial centres, from which socialism recruits its strength, have come into existence. But the country dis- tricts still enjoy representation apportioned to them nearly fifty years ago. And they are strongly Con- servative. Greater Berlin, for instance, sends but 8 members to the Reichstag, whereas it should send 20. All of the members from Berlin are Socialists. The same number of electors in agri- cultural districts return six times as many mem- bers. The same disproportion exists in other in- dustrial centres, all of which, with the possible exception of Cologne, are now represented by Socialist members. In the election of 1907, 20 seats were won by the Conservative party, with an CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 31 average vote of but 10,500, while 6 Socialist seats were won with an average vote of 77,500. The average vote per seat won by the Socialists was 69,020, and the average per seat won by the Con- servative party was 25,680. Were a system of proportional representation introduced, as in Bel- gium, or were the seats distributed according to any just basis, the representation of the Socialists would have been 115 in 1907 and 127 in 1903. Nor are the members paid. This is a further check on democracy. Bismarck insisted upon this provision, and^ the Bundesrat has repeatedly rejected mea- sures passed by the Reichstag providing salaries for the members. From the foregoing it is apparent that the con- stitution does not essentially change the character of the eighteenth-century feudal state or greatly impair the power of the feudal classes. Rather it strengthened and legalized them. It gave the ruling classes the sanction of popular approval, even though the nation was not consulted. The constitution crystallized feudalism into legal form. Privilege, which was previously subject to protest or revolu- tion, as in 1830 and 1848, is now authoritative. It has the backing of the nation rather than of the King, and can be enforced by the courts and the army with every show of legality. The constitution of Germany made concessions to the forms of representative government but safe- 32 SOCIALIZED GERMANY guarded the ruling classes against any real exercise of popular power. The actual power was kept in the hands of an economic class. Privileges enjoyed in an earlier age by force of arms are now en- joyed by law. The German people were given a charter, but the charter contained few rights. Neither the states nor the empire reflect the popu- lar will to any appreciable degree. Prussia, and, through Prussia, Germany, reflects the economic interests of the great estate owner or Junker. He in effect is the government. He maintains his power in Prussia through a reaction- ary constitution, the three-class system of voting and the open indirect ballot, which Bismarck him- self termed "the worst of all electoral systems. " Through these political limitations the Junker controls Prussia and through Prussia the empire as well. He forms a class by himself. And he uses his power to promote his own interests, which are mainly agrarian, to shift the taxes onto others, to maintain the army and the navy, and to resist all electoral reform. Throughout all Europe government by~political parties came in with the written constitution. The system had its origin in Great Britain in which country the line of division was originally between the greater and lesser landlords. In the early half of the nineteenth century, however, the commercial classes obtained control of the Liberal party which CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 33 had previously represented the lesser barons and yeomen. They became ascendant under the regime of Cobden, Bright, and Gladstone, when the Liberal party came to represent the capitalist and trading classes. The Conservative or Tory party, on the other hand, has always been the party of the old aristocracy, the feudal classes. The German Junker has a party of his own, the Conservative. It has ever been the agent of the landed aristocracy. It reflects the will of this class in financial, military, industrial, and social legis- lation. The Junker is strongly imperialistic; he stands for a powerful army and navy, for all legis- lation that will preserve his privileges and power, and he stands for little else. The German manufacturers, the captains of industry, and commercial classes formed another party, the National Liberals. The Clerical or Catholic group, whose strength comes almost ex- clusively from Bavaria, Baden, and the Rhine Provinces, has still another party, the Centre. Its primary concern is religious and it has used its power for the promotion and protection of the interests of the Catholic Church and the peasant class from which the party derives its support. Over against these parties are several parties which are much more liberal. The Freisinnige or Radical group is a party of the lesser capitalists, tradesmen, and shopkeepers. It is a free-trade 34 SOCIALIZED GERMANY party. Its controlling philosophy is laissez-faire. It is in opposition to the Conservative and Liberal parties on agrarian legislation and a protective tariff. It would liberalize the constitution, democratize the suffrage, free the state from the shackles of feudalism, and rely upon the laws of nature and freedom in the development of the nation. The Radical party is very like the present Liberal party in Great Britain. From this liberal group members of the Reichstag taper off into the Social- ists, who form the strongest party in opposition and have the largest vote of any at the polls. The support of socialism comes almost exclusively from the cities and mining districts. Practically every city in the empire elects all or some of its represen- tatives from the Socialist party. It is a party of the proletariat and has been more class-conscious and revolutionary in its doctrines than any socialist group in Europe. Up to the outbreak of the present war it stood aloof from all party alliances and co-operated with none in legislation. It is frankly against all governments save that of the working classes. It is only less hostile to the Radical group than to the Conservative and Liberal ones. It fights its battles alone, is inspired by the class war and the materialist conception of history and politics. It is generally opposed to militarism, a large navy, the "hunger tariff," and the present constitution. It advocates more or less revolution- CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE 35 ary changes, although the younger men of the party are far more moderate than the contemporaries of Marx and Engels, who continue to control the councils of the party. Socialism has spread all over the empire. Wherever industry has changed sleepy rural districts into communities with an alert working-class population, there social democracy has its adherents organized into branches of the party, or of trade-unions influenced by the spirit of the party. Divided roughly, the present membership of the Conservative groups in the Reichstag is 74; of the Centre and Nationalist groups of Poles, Guelphs, Danes, etc., 124; of the National Liberals and Progressive and Radical parties 89, and of the Social Democrats 110. Each party reflects an economic class with the possible exception of the nationalist groups. CHAPTER IV THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE THE wars against Austria and France created the German Empire. They made Prussia ascen- dant. This ascendancy was made permanent by the constitution, adopted after the defeat of France. In the affairs of the empire Prussia has a controlling voice, first, by the hereditary position of the King, as Emperor; second, by the vote of Prussia in the Bundesrat and the Reichstag; and, finally, through the control which Prussia enjoys over any changes in the constitution. Prussia is further supreme by reason of her size, for she contains three-fifths of the population and most of the wealth and industry and almost all of the large cities of the empire. Prussia rules Germany. And Prussia in turn is ruled by the old feudal aristocracy, by the Junkers, or great estate owners. This, too, is written into the constitution and laws of the land. Privileged class rule, in fact, is the German idea of politics. This is true of the empire, the individual states, and the cities. The class is not the same in the different states, but the rule is always by a limited class. 36 ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 37 And over and above them all is the ruling class in Prussia, the old feudal nobility, whose estates are for the most part east of Berlin, in East Prussia, Posen, and Pomerania. In this part of Germany the land is divided into great estates, which have re- mained much as they were in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. There are but few cities and but little organized industry. The industrial re- gions are to the west, along the Rhine and the North Sea. In 1895 and conditions have not changed materially in the meantime 31 per cent, of all the land in Prussia was in estates of more than 250 acres, while in the eastern provinces of Posen and Pomerania the great estates rose to 55 per cent, and 52 per cent, respectively. The average size of the 8,365 greater estates in East Prussia was 1,132 acres, while the average size of 2,793 estates in Pomerania was 1,380 acres. Many of these estates are of far greater extent, and they are owned by the descendants of the feudal barons of previous times. In France, northern Italy, Switzerland, Denmark, and Scandinavia as well as along the Rhine and in South Germany feudal land ownership was converted into peasant proprietorship by the French Revolution or subsequent legislation. It was scarcely touched in Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, and southern Italy. And it is in these countries that reaction persists. In Prussia especially the feudal aristocracy has re- mained almost untouched by the liberalizing influ- 38 SOCIALIZED GERMANY ence of the nineteenth century. It has not inter- married with the commercial classes. Nor have the members entered industry or the professions. Con- tent with the old order, they have preserved many of their privileges and almost all of their political and social power. In this part of Germany the conditions are greatly changed from those described by the great liberator Baron von Stein in the early part of the nineteenth century. He said: "The appearance of the country displeased me as much as the cloudy, northern climate. Great fields, of which a considerable part lies in pasture and fallow, extremely few people, the whole laboring class under the pressure of serfdom, the fields attached to single farms, seldom well built; in one word, a uniformity, a deadly stiffness, a want of life and activity fused over the whole, which op- pressed and soured me greatly. The abode of the Mecklenburg nobleman who keeps down his peas- ants instead of improving their condition strikes me as the lair of a wild beast, who desolates everything around him and surrounds himself with the silence of the grave. " Stein and Hardenberg attempted to put an end to the old feudal abuses as was done in other coun- tries, but their reforms did not penetrate beyond the southern states. The landowners of Prussia de- clined to permit the agrarian reforms to be adopted. And during the intervening century they have con- ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 39 tinued so ascendant in the government that their feudal privileges remain much as they were a hun- dred years ago. Upon their estates they still exercise independent manorial jurisdiction, in which the estates are the administrative units. There is little semblance of self-government, such as prevails in the south, while the economic power of the land- lords over the lives of the workers and the restric- tions of the suffrage preclude the peasants from exercising any real influence in politics. Still other influences have divorced East Prussia from the liberalizing influences of modern life. There is but little industry and comparatively little intercommunication in this part of Germany. The great landowners live upon their estates (where they enjoy something like sovereign powers) and have only occasional contact with the city. Here they rule with feudal authority, while in the legislative halls they resist all legislation which threatens their privileges or powers. " So long as Junkerism exists in Germany and is a leading factor in politics," said a German political leader recently, "there is no possible hope of prog- ress." For the German Junker is a reactionary. He is ultimately responsible for the militarism and jingoism which seem to characterize the whole nation. Land monopoly is the economic framework of Prussia, and through Prussia of the empire as well. 40 SOCIALIZED GERMANY The supremacy of the Junker is insured in Prussia, first by property qualifications of the suffrage and second by a distribution of seats in the Prussian parliament, which lodges practically all power in the large property owners and particularly the landed aristocracy of the eastern provinces. In elections to the Prussian parliament the voting strength of the individual is determined by the amount of in- come taxes paid by him. This applies to state and city elections. The electoral power of the individual is ascertained roughly as follows: The total amount of income taxes paid by all persons is first divided by three. Then those who paid one-third of the taxes are permitted to choose electors, who in turn elect one-third of the deputies to parliament. Then those who paid another third of the taxes elect another third of the deputies by the same indirect process, while the great mass of the people, who have paid the remaining third of the taxes, elect the re- maining third of the members. Under these provisions the poorer classes are practically disfranchised. They have only a sem- blance of a voice in the government. As the system works in practice, from 3 to 5 per cent, of the electors choose one-third of the members of parlia- ment; from 10 to 12 per cent, elect another third, while about 85 per cent, of the voters elect the re- maining third, or would do so were the ballot a secret one and the districts fairly distributed ac- ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 41 cording to population. It is said that in no less than 2,200 electoral districts the first-class electors, who choose one-third of the deputies, consist of but a single voter. This is the electoral basis of the Prussian oligarchy. Every effort to change this system has been re- sisted by the great estate owners. The continuance of their power depends upon the preservation of a system of voting which rests on property rather than on men. It is against this inequality that the Socialist and Radical parties are protesting. It was this that aroused the demonstrations all over Prus- sia in the spring of 1910. The unrepresentative character of the Prussian electoral system appears from the election returns of 1908. Two million, two hundred and fifteen thousand, nine hundred and sixty-one persons par- ticipated in the election. The Social Democrats polled 601,093 votes and elected 7 members, but should have had 105, under a one-man one-vote system, while the Conservatives, or agrarians, cast 356,110 votes and elected 152 members instead of 62 to which manhood suffrage would entitle them. The Clericals cast a vote of 502,594 and secured 104 seats. They should have secured 88, while the Liberal People's party elected 28 members but were entitled to 40. In addition the ballot is open rather than secret. The choice of the voter is declared viva voce. In 42 SOCIALIZED GERMANY consequence the peasant and agricultural laborers do not dare to vote convictions that are contrary to the wishes of the great landowner, while the workers in the city are under the same fear. As a conse- quence many remain away from the polls. In addition to the three-class system of voting and the open ballot election districts bear no relation to the present population. They are distributed so as to give the landed aristocracy an overwhelming advantage. In spite of the growth of cities, more rapid than our own, there has been no distribution of parliamentary seats since before the Franco- Prussian War. In the districts to the east, where the aristocracy controls the elections, the number of inhabitants to each representative is 63,000, while in Socialist Berlin it is nearly three times as much, or 170,000. Berlin has 9 members in the Prus- sian parliament, but should have 24 under a uniform distribution of seats. One election district in Prus- sia has 34,000 inhabitants, while another has 323,000. One-fourth of the population in the sparsely popu- lated districts elects 161 deputies, while another fourth in the cities elects only 41. The Prussian peasant who blindly votes as his landlord orders has many times the electoral power of the far more in- telligent elector of the cities. As a consequence while the Socialists polled 18.8 per cent, of the vote in 1903 they failed to elect a single member. In 1908 they returned 7 representatives, at which time, had the ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 43 election districts been fairly apportioned, they would have elected 81. On the other hand, the conserva- tive land-owning classes elected 161 members, while the business or commercial classes of the cities elected but 17. The situation is not unlike that which pre- vailed in Great Britain before the Reform Act of 1832, which swept away the rotten boroughs. By these devices, the three-class system of voting, the open ballot, and the unequal distribution of seats, the land-owning aristocracy rules Prussia. This is in spite of the commanding importance of industry, of trade, and of commerce, which form the strength and power of the state. Through the ownership of the land and the con- trol of politics the great estate owners control the lives of the peasants. They not only control their wages but their political and social life as well. They elect their own class to parliament, while through an almost complete control over the peas- ants they dictate local administration as well. As a class, the Junker is opposed to education for the peasant; he is opposed to every evidence of liberty or democracy, and clings tenaciously to the divine right of the King and his own class to rule. This is the class that rules Prussia, and through Prussia the empire as well. And the rule is as ab- solute as though it had been expressed by law. In effect it differs only in form from that of feudal times. The Junker has always been willing to sacrifice 44 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the commercial classes to his own advantage. He opposed the development of the system of water- ways and frankly admitted that his opposition was to prevent the reduction of inland transportation costs, and the consequent competition of foreign farm products. Measures for popular education have been resisted, as well as expenditures for im- proving the condition of the peasant classes. The Junker would limit elementary education; he would check ambition, either intellectual or otherwise, and prevent the peasant from acquiring any knowledge that will awaken dissatisfaction with his station in life. From the great estate owners come the chancellors and higher officers of the empire. The Junker officers the army and fills the higher civil service. He moulds the imperial policy and accepts only under protest such small concessions to democracy as Germany enjoys. The merchant class, no matter what its wealth, has never merged with the landed aristocracy as in Great Britain. It has remained separate and apart. The power of the Junker is further strengthened by a class sympathy and understanding with the Bang, who is of the Junker class. He, too, is a great landlord. His traditions are those of the landed aristocracy. For the King comes from that class. The relations of the crown and the aristocracy have never been sundered by conflict as in England, in ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 45 which country the feudal aristocracy was in a con- stant struggle with the King from the thirteenth to the end of the seventeenth century. The contro- versy began with Magna Charta. It was renewed whenever the King endeavored to assert his feudal rights as against the great barons. For the crown was maintained and supported by dues and obli- gations payable by the great estate owners. During centuries of struggle the right of the King to feudal dues and taxes was encroached upon by the aris- tocracy, until the King became a mere figurehead dependent on the consent of his greater vassals for revenue, his army, and his power. Such is the posi- tion of the King of England to-day. In addition, his ancestors disposed of the crown landholdings to favorites or squandered the great estates taken from the monasteries and the guilds under Henry VIII. This made the King dependent upon the landowners in Parliament for revenue, for the King had no per- sonal revenue of his own. In this long struggle over dues and taxes the British constitution was evolved. It ended in the subordination of the crown to Parlia- ment, which up to 1909 was, in effect, subordination to the landed aristocracy. The King of Prussia, on the other hand, kept his feudal landholdings. He remained the first of the great barons. His kingly power was but an evolu- tion of feudal primacy. His private estates were the largest in the kingdom. He escaped the civil 46 SOCIALIZED GERMANY wars of England and France largely because he was economically independent of the landed aristocracy. He did not need to go to them for taxes. The bulk of the Prussian revenues came from domain lands, just as the bulk of the revenues to-day come from these and other productive undertakings. Thus the King and Junker have been in harmony from the beginning of the Prussian Kingdom. Their interests have been identical. The King retained his kingly power because he had no controversies with his barons. The feudal nobility has also re- tained its economic privileges, while the King has increased his royal prerogatives. This has given Junkerism a sympathetic ally in court and the King a body of supporters unlike that of any other coun- try in Europe except Austria and Russia, where sim- ilar conditions prevail. Here again is an unnoticed explanation of the unity of Germany. It explains the rise of Prussia, the power and the persistence of early feudal con- ditions. While France and England were involved in civil wars and parliamentary conflicts between the King and the barons, Prussia, by reason of the identity of interest and the absence of conflict, remained unchanged by the currents of modern life. And when it came to framing a constitution the old regime was translated into constitutional forms, with but little essential alteration in the relations of classes. This is one of the most important in- ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 47 fluences in the making of modern Germany as well as in the unity of her ambitions. The Prussian city is also ruled by an economic class, just as is the state. This rule is secured through the same three-class system of voting, which lodges power in the large taxpayers, who in munici- pal elections are the business men and property owners. Here, too, from 3 to 10 per cent, of the electors choose two-thirds of the members of the city council. Here, too, the Socialists and Labor members are excluded from power. While under manhood suffrage nearly all the cities send Socialist representatives to the Reichstag, the Socialists have practically no representation in the administration of the cities, where they are in an overwhelming majority, and they are never elected to the mayoralty or to the magistrat. The ruling class in the city is the business men. They control the elections and select men of their own class or view-point to the higher administrative positions. And the business men who rule are not the shopkeepers or the tradesmen, they are the men of large means, the real-estate owners, and house owners. And just as the Junker rules Prussia in his own interest, so the business men mould the city to their interest. But strangely enough they have a far more generous outlook than the aristocracy or the business classes of other countries. Only in matters obviously prejudicial to real-estate interests 48 SOCIALIZED GERMANY do they promote their own advantage. As de- scribed elsewhere, 1 they assume a large share of the local taxes, they have municipalized many of the more profitable lines of business, they regulate property in the interest of the community, and build and plan in a far-visioned, patriotic way. No ruling class in the world seems to negative the idea of class control of politics as do the business men of the German cities, for they rule for the city rather than for themselves. Prior to 1870 Germany was profoundly influenced by the southern states, by Bavaria, Wiirtemberg, Baden, and the Rhine Provinces. It was from this part of the old confederation that the agitation for representative government came. It was from the Rhine Province and the South German states that the revolutions of 1830 and 1848 drew their inspira- tion. And these states, like Prussia, reflect the economic foundations of the people. But these states, though monarchical in form, are democratic in spirit. And this democracy in turn is traceable to the wide distribution of land ownership among the peasants, who, through ownership, affect the quality of the government. This part of Germany was profoundly influenced by the French Revolution. Here many of the reforms of Napoleon were accepted. It was in these states, too, that Stein and Hardenberg abolished many of 1 See chapters XXI, XXII, and XXIII. ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 49 the abuses of the feudal regime and brought about the division of the land into small farms, for the most part free from the feudal conditions of an earlier time. As a result of these reforms these states are liberal minded. Even the electoral provisions are more generous to the non-propertied voter. Whereas the three-class system of voting prevails in Prussia, Bavaria has a system of proportional representation under which each party elects representatives in proportion to its voting strength. As a consequence, the Socialists have returned many representatives to the parliament and the city councils, who in turn have elected members of their own party to the magistrat, or executive department of the city. And just as the politics of South Germany reflect the economic foundations of these states, so the psychology of the people is a mirror of the same influence. The South German is easy-going and genial. He is gemutlich. He takes life simply and easily, and, while he recognizes the advantages of the empire and admires the power and forcefulness of Prussia, he chafes somewhat under her arrogance. Even the court life is simpler, more democratic and progressive than in Prussia, while the relations of classes have little of the caste-like hardness which characterizes North Germany. All this is traceable to the long traditions of a home-owning peasantry, whose psychology reflects the sense of freedom which home ownership, wherever it be found, creates a 50 SOCIALIZED GERMANY psychology not dissimilar to that of France, of Hol- land, of Switzerland, or of Scandinavia. Just as East Prussia differs from South Germany, so western Germany differs from both of them. West Germany is the centre of the great industrial development which has taken place during the last forty years. Here are the great iron, steel, cotton, woollen, silk, and chemical industries which have given Germany such eminence. Here are the cities of Essen, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Duisburg, Barmen, Elberfeld, and Crefeld, that form a series of great communities closely related to one another and all dependent upon the iron-ore and coal fields of the Westphalian district. Beyond are the great mari- time cities upon the North Sea and the Baltic, with their splendid harbors and shipping facilities. This is the centre from which the new aristocracy of capital has come an aristocracy which, like the Liberal party in England, struggles with the landed classes for the control of the government. Here is the source of Germany's power in the struggle for world empire; here are many of the most wonder- ful cities the world has known. Yet, despite the preponderance of wealth and energy and the excess of population, this part of Germany remains sub- ordinate to the landed classes of the east, which still dominate the empire. To some extent the cap- italist classes have received social recognition; some of them have reached high places in the ministry. ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF CLASS RULE 51 They are strongly represented in the Reichstag and Prussian parliament. But for the most part their political power is confined to the cities and the lesser governmental positions into which they have entered in recent years. The commercial classes of Germany have not yet achieved the political and social eminence which they enjoy in Great Britain and the United States. CHAPTER V RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 1 PRIOR to 1870 Germany was an agricultural coun- try. There was little factory industry, little foreign trade, only a rudimentary navy and the beginnings of a merchant marine. The traditions of the coun- try were those of the soil, of peasant proprietorship in the south, and of agricultural laborers attached to great landed estates in Prussia, Pomerania, and Posen. The urban population was relatively small. The towns were capital cities, Hauptstaedte, or sea- ports. As late as the middle of the century only 4 per cent, of the population of Prussia lived in cities of more than 100,000 people, while in 1871 68 per cent, were still engaged in agriculture. Fifty years ago Germany did not suggest a great empire challenging the world for supremacy, and believing in its destiny as an irresistible power. Aside from the memories of the Great Elector and Fred- erick the Great there was little in her history to justify such dreams of commanding place. The 1 Much of the material contained in this chapter is taken from Germany's Economic Progress and National Wealth, 1883-1913, by Doctor Karl Helfferich, director of the Deutsche Bank. Where no other acknowledgment is given the statistics of trade and in- dustry are taken from this work. 52 RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 53 contributions of the country were of poetry, phi- losophy, music, education, the inner things of life. The great names of which the world was proud were Goethe, Fichte, Schiller, Lessing, Kant, Mozart, Beethoven, and Heine. Outside of the Prussian aristocracy political leaders aspired to a constitu- tional government like that of England rather than to extended dominion. A score of states were kept asunder by jealousy, differences of temperament, and economic interest, while the rival ambitions of Austria and Prussia seemed to forever preclude a permanent union of the Germanic peoples. There were few natural resources. The soil was far from rich; in many sections it was barren waste. In- dustry was undeveloped, and England, the United States, and France had so occupied the field that successful competition seemed out of the question. There were no natural harbors like those of Great Britain and the United States. Most of the ports have been constructed at colossal cost. It was on such unpromising foundations that the German Empire has been reared. Yet, despite these limitations, the progress of the last generation is without parallel in the history of the world. There is nothing in ancient or modern times to compare with it. So rapid has been the development that the estimated wealth of Great Britain in 1907 was 300,000,000,000 marks, while that of Germany was 350,000,000,000 marks. And this wealth creation has 54 SOCIALIZED GERMANY come about in the short space of a generation, and for the most part during the reign of the present Emperor. Following the formation of the empire a series of laws were enacted that swept away the remnants of the old state individualism and cleared the way for a great forward movement in trade and industry. In 1873 an Imperial Bureau of Railways was estab- lished to control and unify railway transportation. The same year a currency reorganization with gold monometallism as the basis superseded the confusion of coinage of a score of states. The Imperial Bank was started in 1875, and two years later a series of laws were passed covering bankruptcy, judicial reorganization, a civil code, and the reform of criminal and civil procedure. Local government was reorganized. In 1878 the traditional low-tariff policy was discarded and a protective tariff adopted, designed to protect the agricultural classes of the east and provide more adequate revenue. Much of this legislation was inspired by Prince Bismarck. It was almost as comprehensive as that of Napoleon I. Increasing population is an indication of national greatness only when the well-being of the people keeps pace with growing numbers. And increasing popu- lation in Germany has gone hand in hand with in- creasing per-capita wealth, increasing health and well-being, and the universalization of educational opportunities. During the forty-two years from RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 55 1871 to 1913 the population of Germany increased by 62 per cent. The growth from 1871 to 1888 was 7,000,000, or from 41,000,000 to 48,000,000, and from 1888 to 1913 it was 18,000,000, or from 48,- 000,000 to 66,000,000. The most rapid growth has been coincident with the reign of the present Kaiser, Emperor William II, Germany's excess birth-rate over the death-rate is higher than in any other country where similar statistics are kept, with the exception of Russia. The annual increase in population due to this excess has remained for a considerable number of years at approximately 800,000, the increase in 1912 being 839,887. The excess of births over deaths in 1912 was 12.7 per thousand. In 1911 the rate in Eng- land and Wales was 9.8, in Italy 10.1, in France .9, in the United States, where proper vital statistics are kept, 5.4 to 9.9, and in Russia 17. Not only is Germany a prolific country, but wonderful sanitary provisions and scientific health protection co-oper- ate with a high birth-rate in stimulating population. Most of the growth of the last generation has been absorbed by the cities. In fact, almost the whole increase, or about 24,000,000, has been added to the urban population. Agriculture claims a diminishing percentage of the people. In 1871 68 per cent, were employed on the land. In 1882 the rural population had fallen to 42 per cent., and in 1907 to 28.5 per cent. During the period from 56 SOCIALIZED GERMANY 1882 to 1907 the proportion engaged in industry rose from 35.1 per cent, to 42.5 per cent., and in trade and commerce from 9.9 per cent, to 13.3 per cent. As a consequence of this shift in population Ger- many has become an urban nation. Great cities line the river Rhine from the Dutch frontier to Switzerland. They have grown about every harbor on the North Sea and the Baltic. Wherever natural resources or transportation facilities offered an op- portunity there a city has appeared. And these cities are not straggling, unkempt collections of factories and work-people, they are cities of com- manding beauty, of fine architecture, of spacious streets, and of splendid public structures. The growth in urban population has been even more rapid than in the United States. In 1871 there were only 9 cities of more than 100,000 population, while in 1885 there were 21. To-day there are 48. In 1885 8,600,000 people, or 18.4 per cent, of the total, lived in cities of more than 20,000 people. In 1910 there were 22,400,000, or 34.5 per cent, of the whole. In 1885 there were 21 cities of more than 100,000 people with a total population of 4,400,000, or 9.4 per cent, of the total, while in 1910 there were 48 cities of more than 100,000 people with a total population of 13,800,000, or 21.1 per cent, of the whole. In a short generation Gemany has become a nation of great cities, and with few exceptions, RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 57 such as the industrial centres of the Rhine region, they are cities of beauty, charm, and great dignity. This growth in urban population has been ac- companied by many of the evils with which we are familiar. "That this shifting of the centre of gravity of the population from country to town, from agriculture to industry, trade and transportation, has its dark side, is generally recognized, and is denied by no- body. But none the less, the fact cannot be over- looked that it was only the expansion of our indus- tries, our trade, and transportation, that made it possible on German soil to give labor and sustenance to the vastly increased population, to protect us from the misery of overpopulation, and to trans- form the natural growth of the population into a source of increasing wealth." 1 Agriculture in Germany partakes of a science. It is not so well developed as in Denmark or Hol- land. There is not that universal intensive culti- vation that prevails in these countries, or in France, Belgium, or Switzerland. For much of the land in Prussia is owned in great estates, worked by agri- cultural laborers. But scientific agriculture has made great progress. It is a matter of state con- cern. The landed estates belonging to Prussia and the other states are used as experiment stations. They are leased as model farms or operated by the 1 Germany's Economic Progress and National Wealth, 1888-1913, p. 20. 58 SOCIALIZED GERMANY state itself. And while the acreage under culti- vation and the number of people engaged in agri- culture remained stationary from 1883 to 1912, new methods of cultivation brought about a great in- crease in the yield. Fertilizers are extensively and intelligently used, while mechanical power has taken the place of hand labor. In certain sections district central power stations furnish electric power for the operation of all kinds of machines at very low cost, while modern farm machinery has been widely introduced. How materially these new methods of production have increased the productivity of German agricul- ture is indicated by the following table: AVERAGE FOR THE YEARS 1883-7 AVERAGE FOR THE YEARS 1908-12 AREA PLANTED HEC- TARES YIELD TONS YIELD PER HEC- TARE TONS AREA PLANTED HEC- TARES YIELD TONS YIELD PER HEC- TARE TONS Bye Wheat Summer barley Potatoes 5,830,000 1,918,000 1,737,700 2,912,800 3,785,000 5,905,100 5,867,800 2,585,200 2,232,800 25,459,200 4,291,000 16,874,600 1.00 1.34 1.28 8.74 1.13 2.85 6,168,261 1,911,768 1,604,116 3,315,137 4,317,753 5,949,237 11,012,171 3,962,390 3,220,066 44,220,213 8,189,062 25,024,865 1.78 2.07 2.01 13.34 1.90 4.21 Oats Meadow hay . . In some crops the gain has been extraordinary. In the case of rye, in which there was a gain of only 5.8 per cent, in acreage from one five-year period to the other, the increase in the yield was 87.7 per cent., and the increase in yield per hectare was 77.7 per cent. RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 59 Similar methods of cultivation give a yield of 22.6 metric cwt. (220 Ibs.) per hectare of wheat, as compared with 6.9 for Russia, 13.8 for France, 10.7 in the United States, and 9.3 in Argentine. Similar results are obtained in the other staples, as shown in the following table : HAR- VEST YEAR COUNTRY YIELD PER HECTARE IN METRIC CWT. (220 LBS.) WHEAT BYE BAR- LEY OATS POTA- TOES 1912 1912 1912 1911 1912 1912 Germany 22.6 6.9 ( 15.0 I 12.7 13.8 13.7 10.7 18.5 9.0 14.6 11.6 14.3 12.0 10.6 21.9 8.7 16.0 13.9 14.3 16.7 16.0 19.4 8.5 13.0 10.4 12.6 15.0 13.4 150.3 81.7 100.2 84.4 74.2 115.8 76.2 Russia Austria-Hungary .... France Canada United States From Germany's Economic Progress and National Wealth, 1888-1913, Helfferich, p. 55. All this is the more remarkable in view of the fact that neither the soil nor the climate of Germany is particularly favorable. Much of the land has been worked for generations, much of it in the north and east is far from fertile. Moreover, Germany has had to compete with the virgin soil of newer coun- tries, whose surplus produce has been thrown on the European markets during the past few decades at very low prices. But while the land in the United States has been exhausted by careless cultivation and millions of acres of good farming land have been abandoned, in Germany lands far less fertile and cultivated for generations remain in a high state of 60 SOCIALIZED GERMANY fertility. There are no deserted farms in Germany. In addition great stretches of waste-land, such as marshes, heaths, etc., have been brought into till- age. It is claimed that the area of wheat-land is being doubled by these methods and a comfortable living provided for hundreds of thousands of fam- ilies. To some extent Germany has been shielded from foreign competition by a protective tariff, but the tariff has not encouraged agricultural inefficiency, as it has in other countries. The sugar contents of the beet-root were discov- ered by a German scientist, and the growth of this industry in recent years has been phenomenal. Improved methods of cultivation as well as manu- facture have created a great industry, in which Germany stands foremost. In the year 1912-13 the beet-sugar production amounted to 2,701,000 tons; 'in Russia, the next largest producer, it was 1,374,000 tons. 1 In twenty-five years the production 1 The rapidity of the growth of this industry as well as the con- stantly advancing efficiency of manufacture is shown in the follow- ing table: AVERAGE CHOP YEAR BEETS WORKED UP 1,000 TONS AREA IN BEETS HECTARES YIELD OF BEETS PER HECTARE TONS RAW SUGAR PRO- DUCED 1,000 TONS OP BEETS REQUIRED TO MAKE 1 KILO- GRAM OP SUGAR KILOS 1888-89 7,896 149,411 28 991 7.97 1910-11 15,749 477,909 33 2,590 6.08 RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 61 of beets has doubled, while the sugar-refining from beets has increased two and one-half times. Similar improvement has been made in the live- stock industry, with the exception of sheep, which require large pastures for grazing. The number of swine, on the other hand, rose from 9,206,195 in 1883 to 21,805,073 in 1912. During the same period the number of cattle rose from 15,786,764 to 20,- 158,738. Impressive as these statistics are, they fail to tell the whole story because of the great im- provement in the quality of cattle, brought about through scientific breeding and the consequent in- crease in the production of meat and milk. Germany is far less generously endowed with natural resources than is the United States. Coal and iron are plentiful, while salts, zinc, lead, and copper ores are found in considerable quantities. In recent years these minerals have been mined and utilized most economically and form the bases of the remarkable progress in the manufacture of finished products. From 1888 to 1913 the value of mining products, such as coal, ores, and salts, in- creased from 700,000,000 marks to considerably more than 2,000,000,000 marks. The coal produc- tion in 1887 amounted to 76,200,000 tons, with a total value of 351,300,000 marks. By 1911 the pro- duction had risen to 234,500,000 tons, and the value to 1,756,100,000 marks. In 1912 the production had risen to 254,400,000 tons. Germany is the 62 SOCIALIZED GERMANY third largest producer of coal in the world, having almost overtaken England, which a quarter of a century ago produced more than twice as much coal as Germany. The same is true of iron ore, in which production increased threefold from 1887 to 1911. But the in- dustrial development of the country outran even the production of raw materials, and as a consequence an excess of 9,810,500 tons of iron ore was imported in 1912. Pig-iron production increased from 4,024,000 tons in 1887 to 15,574,000 tons in 1911, an increase of 287 per cent., an increase larger than that of the United States with its almost untouched ore de- posits. The United States produced 6,520,000 tons in 1887 and 24,028,000 tons in 1911, an increase of 268.5 per cent. Great Britain and Ireland, which in 1887 produced more than either of the other two countries, produced less than either in 1911, her percentage of increase being only 30.6 per cent. The same phenomenal progress took place in the finished product. The steel production of Germany increased from 954,600 tons in 1886 to 13,698,600 in 1910, an increase of 1,335 per cent. In 1912 it increased still further, to 15,019,300 tons, the only other country approximating this increase being the United States, in which the increase was 910.3 per cent, from 1886 to 1910. The enormous potash deposits of Germany, RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 63 greater than those of any other country in the world, are another element in her natural resources. And the production of potash has increased with phenomenal rapidity. At the end of the year 1910 the production exceeded 8,000,000 tons, worth over 100,000,000 marks, as compared with 1,000,000 tons, worth 25,000,000 marks twenty years earlier. Phos- phate from iron ore is also used as a fertilizer, while the recovery of cyanamide from the atmosphere, supplying the soil with needed nitrogen, is another advance in which Germany has made great progress. Many by-products have been developed by Ger- man science in the upbuilding of her industries. These include the substances taken from mineral coal. The recovery of illuminating-gas in making coke out of mineral coal was one of the earliest dis- coveries, as was the utilization of coal-tar, a by- product in the making of coke. Compounds of carbon produced from coal-tar are the bases of many important industries, such as dye-works, phar- maceutical preparations, etc., in which Germany is the acknowledged leader. The industrial progress of Germany is suggested by the increase in steam-power, which in Prussia alone expanded more than fourfold from 1882 to 1907, in spite of the competition of other kinds of motive power. And if we estimate the efficiency of one mechanical horse-power as equal to the labor capacity of ten men, the effective horse-power in 64 SOCIALIZED GERMANY 1907 was equivalent to the physical labor of 52,000,- 000 men. Water-power and electricity have also been highly developed, along with the gas-engine, in which development Germany is ahead of other countries. Many wonderful improvements have taken place along these lines, by means of which gases are generated from peat, lignite, etc., which are distributed through district stations to manu- facturing plants and transportation systems. Am- monia is a by-product secured in the conversion of peat into gas. The utilization of peat for these pur- poses has opened up a source of power of enormous extent, especially in the extensive moors of Germany. This new source of energy is the more important in that the utilization of peat transforms great stretches of land into arable territory which had before been almost worthless. Science is the handmaiden of industry in Ger- many, as in no other country. Wonderful develop- ments have taken place in iron and steel processes, due to scientific improvements, and iron and steel are fundamental to the manufacture of machinery, railroads, bridges, and structures. They are the bases of modern civilization. Science has co-oper- ated with industry in countless ways in every line of industry. "The compounds of carbon that can be produced from coal-tar have become the bases of important RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 65 new industries, in which Germany, owing to its scientific progress has hitherto enjoyed the unchal- lenged leadership. It is only necessary to mention the most important coal-tar products, like aniline and alizarin dyes, pharmaceutical preparations like aspirin and phenacetin, saccharine and the various coal oils." 1 Similar improvements to those made in the work- ing up of iron and in coal products have been made in other metals. The application of electricity re- covered aluminum from the earth and made it into a great industry. It is of great importance in the development of the modern air-ship and aeroplane industries. "The splendid development in the utilization of coal-tar has its counterpart in the synthesis of or- ganic dye-stuffs (artificial indigo), in the chemical manipulation of wood (cellulose), in the recovery of cyanamide from the atmospheric air, ... in the improvements based on progress in biochemistry, and in the industries based on fermentation pro- cesses (brewing, yeast manufacture, etc.). 2 In 1912 Germany's exports were 8,900,000,000 marks, of which 5,800,000,000 were in manufactured goods. "It would be a mistake, however, to assume that the increase in our producing capacity in manufac- tured goods is fully expressed in the gain of exports. 1 Germany's Economic Progress, p. 33. 2 Idem, p. 33. 66 SOCIALIZED GERMANY General observation and scientific investigations of a detailed character combine to show that the home market for our industrial products has developed even more rapidly than our foreign sales. It would be rather a too low than a too high estimate if we assume that the producing capacity of German manu- facturing industries has been increased threefold in the past twenty-five years." 1 The progress of German industry has been ac- companied by concentration of production into larger and larger units. A far larger proportion of the workers are now employed in great concerns than formerly. In 1907 there were 5,350,025 em- ployees in establishments having over 50 employees, as against 1,613,247 in 1882 and 3,044,267 in 1895, an increase of more than threefold from 1882 to 1907. Consolidation has developed along other lines just as it has in the United States. Of such consolida- tions the Krupp works is the greatest example an establishment which includes coal-mines, coking plants, iron-mines, smelting-works, steel workings, ship-building, the manufacture of machines, cannon, armor-plate, and munitions of war, as well as elec- trical works, river vessels, and fleets for the high seas. The following table indicates the growth in the more important industries, both as to the number of persons employed and the steam-power applied. 1 Idem, p. 67. RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 67 INDUSTRIES PEBSONB EMPLOYED 1882 1895 1907 PER- CENT- AGE IN- CREASE 1882- 1907 Mining, smelting, and salt- works (also wire-drawing for 1882) 430,134 349,196 459,713 356,089 71,777 42,705 910,089 100,156 121,532 469,695 743,881 1,259,791 533,511 85,394 536,289 558,286 639,755 582,672 115,231 57,909 993,257 152,909 160,343 598,496 1,021,490 1,390,604 1,045,516 147,746 879,600 747,057 905,868 1,171,783 167,670 95,957 1,094,955 225,046 206,313 736,424 1,260,580 1,562,382 1,576,804 243,262 104.5 111.1 97.1 229.1 133.6 124.7 20.3 124.7 69.8 56.8 69.5 24.0 195.6 184.9 Stone and earths Metal-working Machinery Chemicals Illuminating materials (fats, oils soap etc ) Textiles Paper Leather Wood and wood- working. . . Foods, beverages etc.. Clothing trade and cleaning Building trade Printing, art reproduction, etc STEAM I >OWER (IN H . P.) 1895 1907 PER- CENT- AGE IN- CREASE 1895- 1907 ELECTRICAL POWER 1907 IN 1,000 KILOWATTS Mining, smelting, and salt- works (also wire-drawing for 1882) 995,069 2,332,968 134.5 422,782 Stone and earths 197,796 503,682 154.7 88,570 Metal-working 142,141 443,224 211.8 128,909 Machinery 184,821 1,215,512 557.7 225,026 Chemicals 83,587 192,905 118.9 42,288 Illuminating materials (fats, oils, soap, etc.) Textiles 29,942 515 583 77,265 886,373 158.1 71.7 13,368 75,126 Paper 201 422 412,908 104.9 54,966 Leather 32 377 85,304 163.5 19,302 Wood and wood- working. . . Foods, beverages, etc 203,235 686,263 346,024 1,185,819 70.3 72.8 56,325 152,763 Clothing trade and cleaning Building trade 19,235 46,274 54,852 189,117 185.2 308.7 18,999 21,497 Printing, art reproduction, etc 18 793 35,974 91.4 40,950 68 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Along with the internal development of the coun- try has gone a remarkable development of overseas trade. Germany has reached out for the markets of the world. In this competition she has rapidly distanced not only Great Britain but America as well. The foreign trade has reached colossal pro- portions in a few years' time. The growth in the value of exports from 1887 to 1912 in three leading industries is as follows: YBAKS COKE ANILINE AND OTHER COAL- TAR DYES ARTIFICIAL INDIGO 1887 Marks 9,400,000 Marks 42,500,000 Marks 6,300,000 1913 126,400,000 133,800,000 45,200,000 In 1912 the foreign trade of Germany amounted to 19,600,000,000 marks, of which 10,700,000,000 was of imports and 8,900,000,000 of exports. Of the imports, however, only 1,600,000,000 marks was in finished goods, the rest being in food products, raw materials, and semimanufactured goods, upon which labor was subsequently employed. At the same time over two-thirds of the exports, or 5,800,- 000,000 marks was in manufactured goods. Machinery holds the first place in value in the export trade, and amounted in 1912 to 630,300,000 marks, as compared with 52,800,000 marks in 1887. The export value of coarse and fine iron goods rose from 16,000,000 marks in 1887 to 580,980,000 marks RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 69 in 1912. Motor-car exports amounted to 65,000,000 marks alone in 1912. The value of coal exported grew from 79,900,000 marks in 1887 to 436,600,000 marks in 1912. The export values of certain finished and semi- finished textile goods increased in a scarcely less re- markable degree, as is indicated by the following table: VALUE IK r MAKKS 1887 1912 Cotton goods 67,300,000 421,600,000 W^oollen goods 177,600,000 253,400,000 Silk goods 16,100,000 190,900,000 34 000 000 84,200,000 17 700 000 64,100,000 The growth of Germany's overseas trade is fur- ther indicated in the tonnage arriving in German ports. In 1887 the aggregate tonnage of ships regis- tering in German ports was 1,675,498, as compared with 5,917,242 in other European ports. In 1911 the ships registering in German ports had increased to 5,397,913 tons, as against 15,330,757 tons in other European ports. In the vessels cleared the registered tonnage amounted to 1,661,471 in Ger- man ports in 1887 and 4,467,353 from other ports. In 1911 the tonnage had risen to 5,495,791 from German ports, as compared with 8,975,665 from other European harbors. This tonnage refers only to merchant vessels carrying cargoes. In 1913 there were only two ports whose foreign traffic exceeded 70 SOCIALIZED GERMANY that of Hamburg, and these ports were Antwerp, whose import and export trade is largely for German account, and the port of New York. Despite many limitations, a restricted seacoast and difficult har- bors, Germany has won a dominant position on the sea, surpassed only by that of Great Britain. In the matter of commercial fleets Germany's proportion of the total seagoing commerce at the GKOUP OP SAILING AND STEAM VESSELS AND TONNAGE OF GERMANY, THE UNITED KINGDOM, AND THE UNITED STATES. SAILING AND STEAM VESSELS i COUNTRY YEAR NUMBER 1,000 REGISTER TONS Germany : 1885 4 102 1 275 5 1911 . . . 4 732 3 023 7 United Kingdom: 1885 1911 23,662 20 919 7,430 11 682 United States- 1885 23 963 4 265 1912 21,278 4,618 3* * Gross tons. STEAMSHIPS COUNTRY YEAR NUMBER 1,000 REGISTER TONS Germany: United Kingdom: United States: 1885 664 2,009 6,644 12,205 5,399 10,309 420.6 2,513.7 3,973.0 10,711.4 1,494.0 2,470.6 1911 1885 1911 . . . 1885 1912 outbreak of the war was far behind that of Great Britain and considerably behind that of the United States, although the steam tonnage of Germany was somewhat ahead of the latter country. But it is the rate of growth that is most significant, and RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 71 in this respect the progress of Germany has been greater than either of the other two powers. Germany's overseas trade has been accompanied by a policy of colonial expansion, upon which the country entered about 1885. England had already appropriated the greater part of the available colonial possessions and concessions during her uninterrupted supremacy on the seas. A similar policy had been pursued in a more limited field by France, Italy, Holland, and Belgium. It was in the face of great difficulties that Germany entered on a colonial policy, which began in Africa and the South Seas in a very modest way. By 1913 the colonial empire of Germany amounted to 2,900,000 square kilometres, about five times the area of the German Empire, in which there is a native popu- lation of more than 11,000,000 people. In these colonies, which are situated in South Africa and the southern Pacific, the white population is still negli- gible, being only about 27,000. As a matter of fact, the colonial policy of Germany has been a failure even from the point of view of the empire itself. However, there has been a considerable extension of railway building and commercial development. The aggregate trade of the African colonies and of the South Seas grew from 46,000,000 marks in 1898 to 263,000,000 marks in 1912, while the trade of Kiao-Chau, the most successful of all German colonies, rose from 34,500,000 marks in 1902 to 72 SOCIALIZED GERMANY 195,000,000 marks in 1911. But the colonial ex- pansion of Germany is but incidental to other fi- nancial and commercial overseas undertakings. Im- mense sums have been invested in development projects like the Bagdad railway and the Shantung railway in China, which opened up extensive regions and gave promise of developing great sources of supply for German products. And in this colonial development, foreign exploitation and merchant- marine promotion the resources of the whole nation have been interlocked as a great engine of promo- tion, including vocational and technical education, the development of trade-schools and colleges of commerce, the sending of thousands of trained men into every section of the globe to familiarize them with commercial needs, to which is added govern- mental encouragement of every possible kind. With rapidly growing industry at home and an increasing population came the need of creating "permanent and well-anchored supports beyond our frontiers." The solid basis of Germany's com- merce is in her home industry, but to a large extent she is dependent on foreign parts for the supply of raw materials for manufacture and markets for the disposal of her surplus. For the purpose of keeping foreign markets open to her goods Germany de- veloped a system of long-term commercial treaties. That this policy has not altogether satisfied her needs is shown in the following significant para- RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 73 graph of Doctor Karl Helfferich, director of the Deutsche Bank, written in 1913: "With the negotiation of treaties for securing the interests of our commerce and shipping, how- ever, we have not been, and dare not be, satisfied to stop. Our dependence upon foreign countries, the counterpart to the great advantages derived by us from having taken our place in world-economy, calls for stronger counterpoises. Such a counter- poise can be created by German enterprise and German capital establishing a field for their activ- ity beyond the borders of our country, and thereby gaining a direct influence over foreign territories that may be important to us as sources of supply and as markets. This can be done in an effectual way by acquiring oversea colonial possessions; for in such case economic influence is secured and strengthened in the most effective manner possible by political domination. In so far, however, as this way is limited or barred up altogether for when Germany, after the restoration of its political power, first cast its eyes over the seas, it found unfortu- nately that the colonial world was already for the most part occupied our end must be reached by means of a far-sighted financial and economic activity." Germany's industrial prosperity has been ac- companied by a great increase in wealth and a gen- eral improvement in the standard of living of all classes. In 1870 the standards of the country were, for the most part, those of agricultural workers, of peasants, for there were but few large cities and little industry. Wages were for the most part low, 74 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the division of labor had not been carried to any appreciable extent, and the number of workers re- ceiving substantial incomes was relatively small. The improvement in the last twenty-five years has been striking. It is confirmed by such Socialists as Bernstein. It is evidenced not only in the income- tax returns but in the per-capita consumption of standard articles, such as tea, coffee, and cocoa- beans. TABLE SHOWING THE CONSUMPTION OF COFFEE, COCOA- BEANS, TEA, AND RICE YEAR COFFEE COCOA-BEANS TEA RICE TOTAL TONS PER CAPUT KILO TOTAL TONS PER CAPUT KILO TOTAL TONS PER CAPUT KILO TOTAL TONS PER CAPUT KILO 1886-90. 1912 114,263 168,158 2.38 2.53 4,954 53,601 0.16 0.81 1,912 4,126 0.04 0.06 84,375 161,072 1.76 2.43 The consumption of cotton in the year 1912 was 501,660 tons, or 7.56 kilograms per caput. Germany's Economic Progress and Wealth, p. 124. The per-capita consumption of cotton increased from 4.19 kilograms, the average for the years 1886-90, to 7.56 kilograms in 1912, an increase of 80 per cent. Cotton is the most important of all the raw materials in the clothing trades, and this increase mirrors the greater variety of wants and their increasing satisfaction by the people. The same thing is indicated by the savings-banks deposits, which in 1888 amounted to 4,550,000,000 marks, while twenty-five years later they had grown to 18,000,000,000 marks, or an increase of nearly RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 75 400 per cent. The total deposits for the whole country in banks, saving funds, and the co-opera- tive societies increased from 6,500,000,000 marks in 1888 to more than 30,000,000,000 marks in 1913. Inasmuch as the income-tax system did not be- come fully operative until 1896, although it was pro- vided for in 1892, the statistics of income-tax re- turns are available for only sixteen years. They show a growth of nearly 100 per cent, in this period. The total incomes, including those exempt, in Prus- sia alone, amounted in 1896 to 12,855,261,000 marks. In 1901 they amounted to 15,347,548,000 marks, in 1906 17,467,934,000 marks, in 1911 21,629,650,000 marks, and in 1912 22,311,749,000 marks. But even under the thoroughgoing system of collection which prevails in Prussia, a certain amount of taxable in- comes inevitably escapes, which is estimated at 10 per cent, on the total taxable incomes for 1912, or 15,240,000,000 marks. There should be added 1,524,000,000 marks, which should be increased by further additions, which would raise the aggregate income for Prussia alone to about 24,000,000,000 marks. The population of Prussia in that year was about 40,000,000, which would give an average income of nearly 600 marks per capita, or between 2,500 and 3,000 marks per family. This is about the average income in the other states of the empire, although in the Hansa cities, Hamburg, Bremen, and Liibeck, 76 SOCIALIZED GERMANY it amounts to nearly 1,000 marks per capita, while in the Thuringian estates it is considerably lower. The total private incomes for all Germany is esti- mated at between 39 and 40 billion marks. The increase in the aggregate income for the past six- teen years amounts to about 80 per cent., and the increase in the average per-capita income to about 45 per cent. 1 It is also claimed that the distribution of earn- ings shows a similar favorable change. From 1896 to 1912 the number of persons in Prussia alone exempt from taxation, including their dependants, because their income was less than 900 marks, fell from 21,066,000 to 16,105,000; while the number of taxpayers, including their dependants, increased from 10,283,000 to 24,232,000. In 1896 more than two-thirds of the people were exempt from the in- come tax, while in 1912 not quite two-fifths enjoyed incomes below the exemption point. Similar increases in taxable income are shown in the various groups during these years. Thus the number of taxpayers in the group enjoying incomes from 900 to 3,000 marks increased from 2,321,000 to 6,123,000, and their total incomes from 3,197,000,000 marks to 8,584,000,000 marks, an increase of about 250 per cent. It was in this group that the greatest increase is registered. The number of taxpayers and the total incomes in the group of those receiving 1 Germany's Economic Progress and Wealth, p. 97. RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 77 from 6,000 marks to 9,500 marks per annum was nearly doubled. The wages of miners increased nearly 200 per cent, from 1888 to 1912. The wages in the mine- inspection district of Upper Silesia, for instance, rose from an average wage of 516 marks in 1888 to 1,053 marks in 1912. In the mine-inspection dis- trict of Dortmund it rose from 863 marks the first year to 1,586 in the latter year. These figures are for net wages, after deductions have been made of the payments for various kinds of insurance, which have increased greatly during the last few years. In the Rhenish-Westphalian district the payments for the various forms of insurance amounted to 204 marks per capita in 1912. Comparing wage in- creases in Germany with those in England, Doctor Helfferich says: "The increase in wage incomes in Germany be- comes more striking through a comparison with England: The average yearly earnings of the Eng- lish coal miner in 1900 amounted to 1,732 marks, against 1,332 marks for the German miner in the Ruhr (Essen) district. In the year 1912, on the other hand, the English average was 1,622 marks, and the German 1,586 marks. Besides this, the German figures here given represent net earnings; whereas the British miner has to pay out of his earnings all the contributions to various forms of insurance, except 20 marks a year per caput which the employers must pay as their average con- tribution for accident insurance. If we add these 78 SOCIALIZED GERMANY 20 marks to the earnings of the British miner, and the 204 marks mentioned above as insurance con- tributions to the earnings of the German miner, we get an average wage of 1,642 marks for the Eng- lish miner in 1912, but 1,790 marks for the German miner in the Ruhr district. The difference in favor of the German miner in 1912 was therefore about 148 marks, whereas it had been in 1900 also after taking into account the insurance contributions of that time 278 marks in favor of the British miner." These are some of the achievements of peace under a system of universal military conscription, which takes every able-bodied man from wealth production for from two to three years of his most active life. It was achieved under heavy and in- creasing tax burdens for naval and military prepara- tion as well as for education and other purposes. It was accompanied by colossal expenditure for the building of the most wonderful cities of the modern world, the construction of great railway systems, of thousands of miles of canals and navigable water- ways, of docks and harbors, as well as millions ex- pended in unproductive enterprises and activities for the health and well-being of the people. How has this been achieved? By what states- manship has an agricultural state, only emerging from eighteenth-century feudalism a half century ago, been raised to a position of commanding in- dustrial, commercial, and agricultural importance? How has the face of the nation been changed, its tra- RECENT ECONOMIC PROGRESS 79 ditional policies and activities reversed, and an in- dustrial empire erected in a few short years upon such unpromising foundations? This it will be the purpose of the succeeding chapters to answer. CHAPTER VI THE THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM AMERICA and Germany have widely divergent ideas as to the nature and functions of the state. We emphasize the right of the individual. His prop- erty and his privileges are jealously protected by the Constitution and the laws. The powers of the state are limited. They are carefully enumerated in the constitution. It is assumed that the state should have as little as possible to do with business ; it should leave productive industries to private in- itiative and should give the individual the greatest possible freedom on the assumption that this is the best way to promote the common good. It is gen- erally assumed, too, that the state is incompetent; that its functions should be limited to those of protection from domestic and foreign aggression. This is the philosophy of individualism, of laissez- faire; a philosophy born of pioneer conditions and later written into our organic law. This philosophy was the product of freedom in America. In Europe it was a reaction against the feudal conditions which prevailed prior to the French Revolution. 80 THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 81 There was universal supervision of trade and in- dustry. Internal and external tariff barriers every- where prevailed, while privileges and restrictions on commerce and trade interfered with the freedom of the individual. France abolished many of these restraints with the Revolution. The idea of indus- trial liberty was carried into England and de- veloped into a philosophy by Adam Smith and Ricardo, the fathers of political economy in that country. Later the teachings of these economists became the working philosophy of the commercial classes who desired free trade and relief from the mediaeval restraints on the individual which the feudal classes struggled to retain. We in America have carried these ideas to even greater extremes. As time went on they were crys- tallized into law and made permanent by our con- stitutions and judicial decisions. The public opinion of the nation became identified with this philosophy. As a nation we still think and act in terms of an earlier age, just as do the Germans. We, however, think in terms of pioneer conditions, they in terms of feudal conditions. We have so weakened the state that great aggregations of wealth have be- come more powerful than the community, while Germany has so strengthened the state as to de- vitalize the individual. There have never been any presumptions in Germany against the state. From earliest times 82 SOCIALIZED GERMANY great landed estates and forests have been owned and operated as part of the fiscal system. The lives and property of the individual have been regulated with inquisitorial officialism. The state has been supreme in the eyes of all classes. It has been feudal, paternalistic, agrarian. There has been no bill of rights for the courts to construe or jealous insistence on personal liberty on the part of the people. The universities reflect this point of view. They find a sanction of state socialism in the history and experience of the country, just as our universities find a sanction of laissez-faire in the teachings of Adam Smith, Ricardo, and the statesmen of Great Britain. Each country has evolved its own political philosophy from its own experience and self-inter- est as understood by the ruling classes. English po- litical economy has never influenced the German mind as it has the French. Adolph Wagner and Gustav Schmoller, both leading professors in the University of Berlin, approve of a wide extension of state activities, and Wagner has carried his ad- vocacy so far as to be classed by many with the political socialists. And public opinion approves of the subordination of the individual to the state and the restriction of the play of self-interest when it becomes harmful to its members. In the mind of the Germans the functions of the state are not susceptible of abstract, a priori deductions. Each THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 83 proposal must be decided by the time and the con- ditions. If it seems advisable for the state to own an industry it should proceed to own it; if it is wise to curb any class or interest it should be curbed. Expediency or opportunism is the rule of states- manship, not abstraction as to the philosophic nature of the state. This point of view is known as monarchical socialism, state socialism, or the socialism of the chair. And all Germany accepts it as the most natural thing in the world. It is not the opinion of the ruling class alone. It is the opinion of all classes. There is almost no dissent to the assump- tion of state supremacy, of subordination of the individual, of the necessity for personal and class sacrifice to the Fatherland, even when the sacrifice is imposed by a ruling class. The individual exists for the state, not the state for the individual. Modern Germany has the social psychology of the cities of ancient Greece. It is the psychology of the old feudalism adjusted to new conditions. Life has changed, but the habit of mind has remained much as it was in the eighteenth century. This paternalism does not necessarily mean less freedom to the individual than that which prevails in America or England. It is rather a different kind of freedom. Political freedom, freedom of speech and the press, and the right of assemblage are not recognized in Germany; they are not protected by 84 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the constitution and the laws as an inalienable, natural right. Rather there is endless supervision of the individual. Verboten is the law of the land. The daily life of the German is supervised by count- less officials under the police power of the state; he is subject to regulations without number upon his daily personal acts. The German, however, does not resent this interference. The rules and regula- tions are accepted as the rules of the road. They make it easier for the average man to live; and, aside from the organized political protests against electoral abuses, the privileged suffrage, and the interference with freedom of speech and the press, there is practically no resentment in Germany against the paternalistic inquisition into the personal activi- ties of the people. In other respects, however, the German enjoys a freedom far greater than that which prevails in America and England. This freedom is of an eco- nomic sort. Privileged interests are kept under control. There is no favoritism upon the railways or waterways. Terminals and harbors are owned by the cities, and water and rail transportation are accessible to all on equal terms. Through the ownership of industrial sections, cities offer building sites to all on easy and equal terms, so that capital is encouraged to enter any field without fear or favor. Credit is under control; while the state itself through its ownership of mines and natural resources keeps THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 85 the raw materials of production open and accessible to all on competitive terms. State socialism in- sures that economic freedom which we in America have sought to secure through the unrestrained play of private initiative. Social legislation directed against the exploitation of the worker and the con- sumer insures freedom in many other ways. It protects the defenseless classes from exploitation and abuse. It safeguards the weak. Universal education offers opportunities to even the poorest to advance whether it be in the service of the state or in the fields of individual effort. Germany pro- tects industrial and social equality, while America protects political and personal equality. Her free- dom is in the economic, ours in the political field. We find state socialism carried further in the cities than by the state. And this is where it should be least expected. For the cities are ruled by the business men, who have received but scant courtesy from the landed aristocracy or the ruling classes in the empire. The dominant note in the cities is commerce, trade, industry, as it is with us. Despite this fact and the control which the business men enjoy through the three-class system of voting, there is far less exploitation by privileged interests than in America, far less than in England. The business men assume the burdens of direct taxation with sur- prising willingness. They impose progressive in- come taxes, often rising to 10 or 15 per cent, for all 86 SOCIALIZED GERMANY purposes, upon their incomes. They impose taxes on business, land, and the unearned increment of land values. They burden their cities with in- debtedness to make them beautiful and livable and spend generously for education and other purposes. They have municipalized the street railways, gas, electric-light, and other public-service corporations and have entered into municipal land speculation and house-building activities in competition with themselves. Cities own banks. They regulate pro- perty for the good of all and the protection of posterity. They build and plan for the future with a big vision of the city as does no class in any cities in the world. This acceptance of control, of regulation, of state socialism is indicative of the point of view of Ger- many. It is not a patriotism for the Kaiser alone. It is a patriotism for the Fatherland. With such a background and with such a conception of the rela- tive importance of public and private rights, it is easy to understand why state and municipal socialism have developed so rapidly in Germany during the last quarter of a century. The entrance of the state into industry has been simplified, it is true, by the fact that the ruling class is the landed aristocracy. The great estate owners, or Junkers, did not own the railways or the public- service corporations of the cities. They were not interested in manufacturing or commerce. They THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 87 live on their estates and have but little interest in industry. Nor have they married into the com- mercial aristocracy as they have in England, where the landed aristocracy has been merged with the rail- way, financial, and capitalist classes. The Junker has always kept aloof from commerce, for which he has little real respect. As a consequence there was no conflict of interest in the determination of policy. The dominant political class has not been opposed to state socialism, so long as state socialism did not interfere with its own privileges and property. Finally, Germany did not emerge into an in- dustrial state until after the Franco-Prussian War. The traditions of feudalism continued long after they had passed away in France, England, and those parts of Europe where the French Revolution exerted an influence. With such traditions as these it was perfectly natural for the state to undertake new activities and tighten its control over individuals or corpora- tions whose actions were inimical to the state. If the state could own great estates and manage them at a profit, if it could care for its people in time of distress, why should it not perform other functions, which in modern times lie close to the life and well- being of the state, especially when the things to be owned and the interests to be regulated were the property of a class which was but scantily represented in the councils of the nation. 88 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Added to these considerations is the fact that the civil service in Germany is very efficient. It is also permanent. Government service is the goal of all classes. The official service is recruited from the best talent of the nation. Admission to responsible positions in the civil service is only open to those who have pursued collegiate or engineering training followed by the severest kind of examinations. Titles are universal and are scrupulously observed, even if they be of an insignificant sort, while a system of universal pensions gives assurance to government employment that adds much to its attractiveness. There are a hundred trained men seeking admission to every governmental opening. The majority of the candidates have been preparing for the service from the time they departed the secondary schools, and in the majority of instances they have con- sciously directed their education to a particular field of activity. Men are not educated democratically for any career as in America. They do not turn their hand from one occupation or profession to another. Rather they are trained, in a killing com- petition, to the particular employment in which they make a start. Rarely is there an opportunity to turn back once the decision is made. And in the government service the choice is only to go forward or drop in the pace, and in many cases failure means suicide. For suicide is common among the edu- cated proletariat of Germany. With such a civil THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 89 service as this, Germany has been equipped to undertake any activity and to carry on any under- taking. There is no clearly defined line of demarcation between the industries that should be socialized and those that should not. All forms of transpor- tation are in the hands of the state, including the railways, canals, waterways, docks, harbors, ter- PROPERTIES OWNED CAPITAL VALUES NET PROFITS PROM OPERATION Farms $198,122,725 $7,925,309 Forests 730,898,200 29,235,928 Mines 128,907,725 5,116,309 Railways 4,706,904,750 189,916,190 Telegraphs Telephones . 694,816,650 27,792,666 Express Mails Other works 435,184,900 17,407,476 Total $6,894,834,950 $277,393,878 minals, telegraphs, telephones, and express business. Coal, iron, and potash mines are operated, while great forests and agricultural lands have been owned by the states and cities from very early times. In- dividual states own porcelain manufactories, banks, lotteries, baths and mineral springs, amber works, and breweries. The state printing works produced a revenue of $800,000 in 1913, while the shares owned in the Imperial Bank yield a substantial sum. Prussia is the largest single mine and mineral owner 90 SOCIALIZED GERMANY in the kingdom, and in 1906 operated 36 mines, 12 smelting-works, 5 salt-works, 3 stone-quarries, and 1 amber works. The total capital value of the principal activities owned by the empire and the states is approxi- mately $7,000,000,000, and the net annual profits are nearly $300,000,000, distributed as shown in table on page 89. 1 The field of socialization is being constantly extended. In 1908 the Prussian Diet appropriated $15,000,000 for the sinking of new coal shafts, while in the building of the Weser Canal from the Rhine to Hanover $5,000,000 was set aside for the purchase of land on both sides of the canal way so that the community could retain the unearned increment from the increase in land values which the building of the waterway created. In addition by the owner- ship of the riparian property the whole development could be so planned as to provide factory sites and distribute industry and population over a large area admirably suited for manufacturing and at the same time so distribute population as to prevent the appearance of bad housing conditions. The government of Saxony has proposed the erection of large cast-steel works for the making of rails and other material needed, by the state-owned railway lines. The Post Office Department operates savings 1 Roberts, Monarchical Socialism in Germany, p. 7. THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 91 banks, and millions of persons have checking ac- counts with the post office the same as with a private bank. The German postman takes orders for dry goods, groceries, and other commodities at the door and later delivers them at a nominal charge. The parcel post is universally used for the distribution of products of all kinds. It is a great marketing agency, and through it many hundreds of thousands of people purchase their food supplies directly from the farm. To such an extent has public banking superseded private banking that 92 per cent, of all deposits are in public institutions. Cities also operate pawn-shops as an aid to those in distress and have done so for generations. Bavaria has insured her farmers against fire, hail, and the loss of live stock for generations. At the present time about $20,000,000 of property is in- sured by the state against fire, while 142,000 farmers are insured against loss by hailstones to the extent of $57,500,000. Cities also carry on the fire-insur- ance business. Recently the state and local author- ities have begun the development of hydroelectric plants. Some years ago a group of rural districts determined to unite for the purpose of erecting a central power station to serve a district in Cassel. A representative of the government appeared and announced that the state had decided to carry out a similar project; so the local plans had to be dropped. The government project involved the construction 92 SOCIALIZED GERMANY of a large overland station to serve the northern part of the Province of Hesse and the southern part of the Province of Hanover, the water-power to be obtained from three sources. The most important electric-power project is that of the Bavarian govern- ment for utilizing the water of the Bavarian high- lands for the supply of electric light and power to all parts of the country. The government does not plan to carry out this scheme itself, but formulated the general features of the proposal and left the exe- cution of the various works to others with the object of securing co-ordinated action and a proper regard for the public interest. Not only is power to be supplied for industrial, agricultural, and domestic purposes, but several lines of state railways are to be electrified as well. The number of employees in the imperial and state service is growing every year. In 1908 it was about 3,000,000. There were then 563,684 in the railway service, 309,026 in the posts and telegraphs, 390,005 in police and diplomatic, and 125,980 in forestry and game-preserving. 1 Immense profits are realized from these activities. In 1908 the profits of the empire and of the states composing it amounted to $277,285,095. In 1911 the profits amounted to $282,749,224. These earn- ings are used to reduce the burdens of taxation. The combined federated states secure 38 per cent, of their 1 Berry, Germany of the Germans, p. 47. THEORY AND EXTENT OF STATE SOCIALISM 93 total revenues from their enterprises, while, including the imperial government, one-fourth of all the cur- rent needs of the combined governments are derived from business undertakings. Of the larger states, Bavaria secures 39 per cent, of its revenue from in- dustrial undertakings, Wiirtemberg 38.7 per cent., and Prussia 47.56 per cent. Herein is one explanation of the relative ease with which Germany supports the colossal expenditures for war and armament as well as the appropriations made in recent years for internal improvements. With from 35 to 50 per cent, of the state revenues obtained from industrial pursuits, the task of the financier is greatly simplified in comparison with that of surrounding countries. When to this is added the ownership of a controlling interest in the Imperial Bank and the actual control of over 90 per cent, of the savings of the people deposited in mu- nicipal banks and the postal system, the credit opera- tions of the empire are still further facilitated. The railways are part of the state, as are the express and telegraph business, while the mines supply fuel at the cost of production. Thus the state is almost self-contained, so far as its more important functions are concerned. It is not improbable that the am- bitious undertakings of recent years would have been impossible but for these contributing factors, which greatly simplify the problem and relieve the financial burden. Germany's military prowess would prob- 94 SOCIALIZED GERMANY ably have been out of the question without the aid of these socialistic services, while her industrial and commercial advancement would have been difficult if not impossible of achievement. CHAPTER VII THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS No single agency has done more for the develop- ment of Germany than the state-owned railways. They have aided in welding the twenty-six states into a nation and have contributed in countless ways to the upbuilding of domestic industry and foreign commerce. Their strategic value in time of war has been demonstrated in the present European conflict. The first German railways were built by private capital under concessions from the individual states, although Prussia had begun to experiment in this field as early as 1850. But private operation was never satisfactory and, following the war with France, Bismarck urged the acquisition of the railways by the empire. At this time the railways of Bavaria, Saxony, Baden, and Wiirtemberg were for the most part owned by these states, and they, jealous of the ascendancy of Prussia and appreciative of the value of their possessions, declined to acquiesce in Bis- marck's proposal. But Bismarck persevered in his policy. He saw in the railways a means for the con- solidation of the nation as well as a military agency of great strategic value. In addition, through cen- 95 96 SOCIALIZED GERMANY tralized management, the chaos of state and local rates and charges would be brought to an end. The refusal of the states to transfer their systems to the empire led Prussia to develop her own system. Most of the more profitable lines were in private hands, and by reason of the monopoly and large earnings which the companies enjoyed they were disinclined to extend their systems to meet the in- dustrial revival which followed the Franco-Prussian War. This and the obvious profitableness of the railways led to the appointment of a committee by the Prussian parliament to investigate the whole matter, which committee subsequently reported that it was desirable from every point of view that all the railways should be nationalized. Parliament took the first steps in this direction in 1873, first by the enlargement of the existing state system, and second by the acquisition of the lines of a considerable number of private companies. From this time on nationalization was rapid, the negotiations for the most part being carried on in a friendly spirit, for many of the shareholders were agreeable to the sale. The original concessions to the companies contained reservations under which it was possible for the state to acquire the lines upon a valuation ascertained from a capitalization of the dividends earned during the ten years prior to pur- chase, or in case the roads had not been in operation for so long a period then the dividends earned during THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 97 the preceding three years were taken as a basis of purchase. If no dividends at all had been earned then other evidences were to be used to ascertain the value. This would seem to be a generous basis for ac- quisition, but inasmuch as many of the roads were acquired by the state in the early years of their working, and as their rates and charges were subject to regulation, the states, and especially Prussia, were often able to buy advantageously and at a low price. However, in most instances the stockholders were treated fairly, and in many instances preferred to exchange their securities for those of the state. Proceedings similar to those of Prussia were taken by other states, until at the present time over 90 per cent, of the railway mileage of Germany is owned by the several states, the remaining 10 per cent, being in private hands. The latter holdings, however, are for the most part confined to unimportant lines and light railways. The growth in mileage of the states in the empire from 1875 to 1910 is as follows: l YEARS LENGTH OF FULL-GAUGE LINES LENGTH OWNED BY STATES 1875 17 483 miles 1880 21,028 " 13,888 miles 1890 26 136 " 18,738 " 1900 31,049 " 28,570 " 1910 36 894 " 34,596 " As to the general efficiency of the German railways there is no dispute. The service is excellent, the 1 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 50. 98 SOCIALIZED GERMANY equipment is of a high order, while the comfort and convenience of the public is considered in every possible way. Accidents either to passengers or employees are of infrequent occurrence. Trains arrive punctually, while the stations are spacious and are usually among the most imposing structures in the city. Passenger fares are low and are ad- justed to the purse of all classes, while the profits from operation are so large as materially to reduce the burdens of taxation. , The Prussian railways are the best equipped and best managed of any in the empire, if not in Europe. The capital invested has increased from $370,000,000 in 1879 to $2,709,150,000 in 1910. A large part of the capital investment has been earned by the rail- ways and devoted to the extension and betterment of the service. The net profits from operation, after deducting interest on the indebtedness and making ample provision for depreciation rose from $10,000,- 000 in 1882 to $140,000,000 in 1906. When the railways were first acquired the fear was expressed that the government had entered upon a hazardous financial experiment, but W. H. Dawson, a thorough student of modern Germany, says the transaction has proved to be "a brilliant stroke of business if not the most brilliant ever trans- acted by a modern state." 1 Continuing he says: " It is in the domain of railway ownership and ad- ministration that the state has achieved its greatest 1 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 55. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 99 success. It has been estimated that since they passed into the national possession the German rail- ways have provided $750,000,000 of revenue. The profits are perhaps swelled by the low wages paid to inferior grades of labor and because there are so many females in the railway service. But the state tries to make up for this by providing houses at low rents, free garden-plots, pensions, bonuses, holidays, etc. It must be admitted, however, that the wage ques- tion is still a sore one and is agitated as much as possible under the strict system prevailing, which allows no strikes in this branch of the state service. There is always a temptation to work the railways for more revenue in these days, but on the whole the governments keep well to the front the interests of traffic and commerce." 1 The Prussian state railways are the most profitable of any in the empire and earn approximately 8 per cent, on an actual cash investment of $2,700,000,000. The net profits from operation in 1911 amounted to $178,000,000 or more than twice the income from taxes, which was $85,000,000. 2 This sum went into the state treasury and reduced taxation to that extent or was used for other public purposes. Summarizing his opinion of the operation of the Prussian state railroads, Mr. Carl Vrooman says: 3 "Unquestionably the Prussian state railways have made the best showing financially of any government 1 Dawson, idem. 2 Roberts, Monarchical Socialism in Germany, p. 4. 8 Vrooman, American Railway Problems in the Light of European Experience } p. 160. 100 SOCIALIZED GERMANY railways in the world, in spite of the fact that the state management has given to the people of Prussia the best and safest transportation service on the continent of Europe and has charged for this service as little if not less than has any continental railway system. At the same time the Prussian state rail- way system during the last quarter of a century has brought into the state treasury every year enormous sums of money as profits. Indeed there is criticism on many sides that the results have been too brilliant; that industry should not be taxed to relieve general taxation. " By 1905 the Prussian railways had paid into the treasury, as profits, more than enough to pay off every cent of railway indebtedness, including interest, leaving the great system with all equipment as a net asset in the hands of the state. This, too, was in spite of the fact that many unprofitable extensions have been constructed which private capital prob- ably never would have attempted. A paper read by Professor Herman Schumaker, professor of political economy at the University of Bonn, in January, 1912, before the Royal Economic Society, describes the results that followed national operation. "The result of all these economies," he says, "is a magnificent one. The aggregate revenue of the Prussian State Railways has risen, during the twenty- five years from 1883-1908, from 536,000,000 marks to 1,910,000,000 marks, or from 34,503 to 52,795 marks per kilometre of railway track. Although THE STATE-OWNED RAJLWA.YS 101 the expenses both of the staff and of the stock and plant have increased very considerably (the cost per kilometre per axle was 5.43 pfg. in 1895 and 7.4 pfg. in 1908), nevertheless the gross working profits have increased from 222,000,000 marks in 1883 to 548,000,000 marks in 1908; so far, the maximum obtained was, in 1906, namely 698,000,000 marks. "These extraordinary working profits, which in the aggregate amount since the nationalization of the railways to a total of nearly 12,000,000,000 marks, have greatly benefited the Prussian State Railways. They enabled them to meet nearly the whole of the cost of construction of existing railways out of current revenue. In fact, one may say that all expenses necessary for the maintenance and preservation of railway property have been met out of current revenue. This continual capitalization of the net profits has rendered unnecessary any writing off to make due provision for the main- tenance of the property. The present aggregate value of the Prussian State Railways not only equals, but exceeds the whole amount of capital taken up on loan by the Prussian State for the purchase and development of the railway system. When, never- theless, a redemption of the loan has taken place, and will be further increased in the future, that is done not for the preservation, but for the augmen- tation of capital. In contrast to the overcapitali- zation of many foreign railways, the object aimed at and achieved has been the undercapitalization of the Prussian State Railways. This is the solid foundation on which the Prussian railway finance is based. "But this does not exhaust the financial success of the Prussian State Railways. Although, as has been pointed out, it was by no means the original 102 SOCIALIZED GERMANY intention, railways have nevertheless become, under the combined influence of the above-mentioned fac- tors, a considerable source of revenue to the State. A total of nearly 3,000,000,000 marks has been placed at the disposal of the Prussian Government for other State purposes out of the surplus of the railways. It is true that in consequence of the varying conditions of trade the figures are liable to great fluctuations, and therefore involve certain risks to the State, which have not always been met effectively by the Prussian financial administration, but this does not detract from the momentous advantage that, thanks to its railways, the Prussian State was in a position to participate financially at once in the great rise of prosperity in German industrial life. Hence, the fact, that Prussian finance presents, on the whole, such favorable con- ditions, is largely due to the Prussian State Rail- ways." The railways of the other states are likewise profitable, although, with the exception of Saxony and Bavaria, these states contain comparatively few cities and relatively little industry. In 1911 the Bavarian railroads earned 4.5 per cent, on the outstanding loans; Saxony, 5.4 per cent.; Wurtem- berg, 3.4 per cent.; and Baden, 3.8 per cent. 1 The proportion of the state income derived (1) from the railroads, (2) from other state-owned prop- erty, and (3) from taxes in the more important states is indicated by the following table : 2 1 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 55. 2 Statistisches Jahrbuch, 1913, p. 345. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 103 STATE FBOM RAILROADS OTHER STATE- OWNED PROP- ERTIES AND OTHER SOURCES OF STATE IN- COME TOTAL TAX RE- CEIPTS Prussia Marks 539,954,000 Marks 118,000,000 Marks 495,763,000 Saxony 44,608,000 15,020,000 90,890,000 Wiirtemberg . . . Baden 21,281,000 29,869,000 21,319,000 5,479,000 54,633,000 57,009,000 From the above it appears that 57 per cent, of the income of Prussia is derived from productive industries owned by the state, and 46 per cent, from the railways alone. In Saxony, 29 per cent, of the revenue of the state comes from the railways, in Wiirtemberg, 22 per cent., and in Baden, 32 per cent. When it is considered that the income taxes are the largest single source of state and local taxation, it is easy to understand the universal approval of public ownership even in a country as completely governed by the landed and capitalist classes as is Germany. But the financial success of the railways, re- markable as it is, is of secondary importance. "I do not regard railways," said Bismarck, "as in the main intent, to be the object of financial competition; according to my view, railways are intended more for the service of traffic than of finance, though it would, of course, be foolish to say that they should not bring financial advantages." It is difficult to overstate the extent to which the 104 SOCIALIZED GERMANY railways have contributed to the upbuilding of Germany. The casual traveller sees but little of this, the reports only scantily suggest it, and the mere statement that the underlying motive of operation is service, conveys but little idea of the extent to which the industrial and social develop- ment of the country has been promoted through the railways. The very life of the nation is, in fact, woven into the transportation agencies, which are not operated as a separate, detached thing, but are related to every need of the empire and are con- sciously administered to serve its destiny. " German railroads," says an English observer, "have largely contributed to the prosperity of Ger- man industry; the British railways have largely con- tributed to the decay of British industries. In Germany trade policy is made by trade; in Great Britain it is made by the railroads, which, without consulting the trade, prescribe its course, stimulating it here and stifling it there." 1 Such struggles, as almost every American city has experienced in order to secure even tolerable terminal facilities, betterments, or service, are in- conceivable in Germany. In place of hostility and conflict, the state anticipates industrial and mu- nicipal needs. The harbors and water-fronts are operated in closest harmony with the railway ter- minals, which are planned as a co-operating unit in 1 Eltzbacher, Contemporary Review, February, 1905. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 105 the industrial programme. Great factory areas are laid out with sidings and switches. The ap- proaches to cities are not disfigured with unsightly cuts and surroundings; rather they are sodded and parked and made as unobtrusive as possible. The stations of cities like Frankfort, Cologne, Dresden, and Hamburg, are of splendid architecture, with artistic overhead approaches which disfigure but little the beauty of the city. Frankfort, a town of 400,000 people, has a station erected many years ago at a cost of $10,000,000, when Frankfort was a small town. There are no grade crossings. The tracks are raised or depressed as necessity requires. Every- thing is built for permanence and with provision for safety. There are very few accidents. "German railway trains arrive nineteen times out of twenty to the minute because the government punishes severely those responsible for the delay." 1 New lines are built when needed, even if they are not profitable, for the convenience of the people or the upbuilding of an industry or a territory. Nor do localities or industries interfere unduly with the administration in their efforts to secure favors or special privileges. This is checked by the active participation of representatives of chambers of commerce and agricultural bodies in the actual administration of the system. Under private operation the companies showed 1 J. Ellis Barker, Modern Germany, p. 460. 106 SOCIALIZED GERMANY a tendency to give low rates on foreign goods des- tined to inland points because of the competition of the waterways. This policy was reversed by the state, and where discriminations are now made, they are in favor of German rather than foreign shippers. In order to attract trade to German sea- ports, low rates are granted on goods from Hungary or Russia, passing through Germany and destined for England. The nearest and most natural ports for the busy manufacturing districts of Westphalia are those of Rotterdam and Antwerp, and if railway rates were fixed solely by distance, Hamburg and Bremen would find difficulty in competing with the Dutch and Belgian ports, so far as the traffic of Westphalia is concerned. The result would be a loss of business both to the German railways and German ports to the benefit of foreign railways and foreign ports. In order to prevent this the "Prus- sian railways concede exceptionally low rates from various manufacturing centres in Germany, and especially in the Rhine district, for goods conveyed to Hamburg and Bremen." 1 These examples are indicative of the studied co- operation of the railways with industry. Several years ago, when there was a poor fruit harvest in Holland, German fruit-growers sent large quantities of fruit to Dutch preserve makers, being helped to do so by the exceptionally low rates on the Prussian 1 Pratt, Railways and Nationalization p. 262. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 107 railways to the Dutch frontier. The next year fruit was plentiful in Holland, but scarce in Germany, and the Dutch traders expected to profit by the low rates of the year before. Instead, they found the rates raised to a prohibitive point to protect the German traders. 1 During the industrial depression in 1908, the railways lowered freight tariffs 64 per cent, in order to encourage export trade which was suffering with that of other countries. 2 In the same way export trade is fostered by lower rates on goods destined for abroad than for home consumption. In general, the rate on goods for export is as low proportionately for parcels as it is for carload lots shipped from one part of the coun- try to another. The following table illustrates this difference, with regard to a few representative lines of goods: 3 IN 10-ToN LOTS PER METRIC TON EXPORT RATE NORMAL RATE Cotton goods, Cologne to Ham- burs $3.64 5.83 2.53 $6.38 9.33 4.86 Toys, Nuremberg to Hamburg. . Machinery and machine parts, Cologne to Hamburg . ... In many cases, special rates are made to encourage a new industry. For instance, a man finds sand which he thinks suitable to the manufacture of glass. 1 Pratt, supra. 2 British Consular Reports, 1899. 3 E. Roberts, Scribner's Magazine, February, 1911. 108 SOCIALIZED GERMANY He desires to start a manufacturing plant, provided he can secure the necessary combination of chemi- cals, coal, etc. He first places the matter before the local Chamber of Commerce, which in Germany is a semiofficial organization. If the proposal meets with approval, a recommendation is made to the railway authorities for special rates, who make a fresh examination, and if they approve a special rate is granted. In this manner the industry of the Siegerland district is stimulated by a reduction in the rate on ore to the Ruhr and Aix-la-Chapelle districts and in the rates for the conveyance of fuel needed by the Siegerland iron industry. In the same way the disadvantage of the inland position of Lorraine is minimized by special railway rates. 1 In fact, 66 per cent, of all the freight carried on the German railways is taken under exceptional rates, designed in almost all cases to meet some in- dustrial need. 2 Mr. Elmer Roberts states: "All the devices (rebates, special rates, etc.) so passionately hated here (U. S.) are applied there, but with this difference that while in Ajnerica these devices are suggested, even necessitated by the war of interests or the will of the individual managers, they are applied in Germany according to principles of equity which take into account in- dustry, trade and agriculture as a national whole, granting exceptions, taking one sort of traffic as privileged, another as normal, upon calculations 1 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 58. 2 Roberts, Monarchical Socialism in Germany, p. 31. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 109 wide enough to include the interests of the whole people. " l The Prussian minister of public works stated in the lower house in April, 1912: "I intend to be always in the first place a Min- ister of Communications, though, at the same time I must as a minister take account of the financial well-being of the state. Like Bismarck, I regard the railways as primarily a transport institution and not as a milch cow, and I shall never administer my department in a purely fiscal spirit." 2 Secret discriminations between individuals or corporations seem to be unknown in Germany. Neither is one city developed at the expense of an- other, except in so far as it is to the advantage of the whole community to grant special privileges for the development of trade or commerce. The Prussian Cabinet made the following statement in 1879 upon this subject: "The granting of these secret advantages in the most diversified ways to individual shippers, and in particular the so-called rebate system, is the most injurious misuse of powers granted to railroad cor- porations. It renders government control of rates impossible, makes competition between different lines, as well as that of the shippers dependent upon them, dishonorable and unfair, carries corruption among the railroad employees, and leads more and 1 Roberts, "German Railway Policy," Scribner's Magazine, Feb- ruary, 1911. 2 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 56. 110 SOCIALIZED GERMANY more to the subordination of the railroad manage- ment to the special interests of certain powerful cliques. It is the duty of the government to oppose this evil, to uphold the principle of the equal treat- ment of all snippers, and to enforce the legislative regulations on this subject. The importance of this problem is only equalled by the difficulty of its solution." 1 Many special services are performed to aid shippers. For instance, the railways undertake to be responsible for the delivery of a shipment, so that when the consignor has paid the freight, he need have no more worry about the goods than if he had sent a stamped letter through the mails. The railway also obtains for the shipper a bill of lading when the goods are placed aboard the steamer, on which he may receive his money. 2 Easily understandable tariff rate-books for com- bined rail and sea routes are prepared by the rail- way authorities. They are so simple that any lay- man can understand them and so complete and accurate that the merchant can tell the exact price of shipment of any kind of goods from his city to any part of the world. 3 Nor have the financial gains of the state led to indifference to improvements. "Reduction of freights and the growth of profits have not been at 1 Frank Parsons, The Heart of the Railroad Problem, p. 316. 2 Roberts, "German Railway Policy," Scribner's Magazine, Feb- ruary, 1911. 8 Roberts, Monarchical Socialism, p. 26. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 111 the expense of technical improvements. In the matter of size of cars, tunnels, terminal facilities, in- troduction of steel cars, etc., the state railways of Prussia are making greater progress than other rail- ways of Europe. Better equipment and improved terminal arrangements are being introduced side by side with the reduction of rates and increased profits. Where the traffic is dense, special depots for par- ticular freight are provided, instances of which are the cattle depot and fuel depot of Berlin. The block system is almost universal." 1 Despite these services, traders are continually complaining that the government is making too much money out of the railroads instead of forwarding goods faster, provid- ing more trains, etc. All railroad employees are in the civil service. There are no political appointments or favoritism. The higher officials are required to have a university or technical school education before they may even take an examination for the service. Engineers must have had a thorough technical education and must have practised their profession for eight or ten years in private employment, before they are qualified to take the second examinations required by the state. 2 Prussia and some of the other states are preparing plans for the electrification of the railroads. The 1 Vrooman, American Railway Probkms in the Light of European Experience, p. 122. 2 Vrooman, supra, p. 273. 112 SOCIALIZED GERMANY former state has already electrified a portion of the line from Magdeburg to Halle. Power is produced at a central station erected near the coal-mines, and the government has made a contract for cheap power for thirty years. The improvement has proved so successful that the government is now about to electrify 160 miles of railway in the Silesian hills district. The states of Saxony and Bavaria are likewise planning to electrify some of their lines. The Saxon government has bought coal-mines at a cost of $11,500,000 with the object of having at its command an abundance of cheap fuel. The policy of service is followed in passenger as well as freight rates. Low rates are made from the cities to the suburbs. Cheap transportation is also offered on Sundays and holidays in order to carry the people to the country. Excursion trains run third and fourth class coaches which are filled to over- flowing with men, women, and their families bound on a holiday. The railways are used far more generally in Germany than in the United States. People ride more frequently and on the whole more universally, despite the higher standard of life in this country. In 1901 the passenger traffic per kilometre was 413,820 in Germany, as compared with 89,721 in the United States. The average income per mile per person of the railways was $.0103 in the former country and $.0206 in the latter. In other words, the average fare per mile in America THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 113 was exactly twice what it was in Germany. The average ton-mile freight rates, however, are nearly reversed, the rate on freight traffic per ton per mile in Germany being $.013 and in the United States $.0076. It is difficult, however, to draw conclusions as to the relative cost to the shipper or the public in the two countries, because so large a part of the railway freight traffic in America is made up of raw materials, like coal, iron ore, lumber and building materials, and foodstuffs, which in Germany are transported by water at a very low rate. A fairer comparison would be by classified articles. It is repeatedly urged by American railways that the average freight rate in this country per ton mile is very much lower than in Europe, and that while the earnings of our railways in 1910 averaged $10,769.40 per mile, if the European rate had been charged, they would have been $14,580 per mile. 1 And it is constantly asserted that the ton-mile rates in this country are but half what they are in Ger- many. Again it is impossible to accept any single factor in making comparisons of transportation costs. There are scores of elements which must be taken into consideration, such as switching and forwarding charges, demurrage, and the like. As against these debatable comparisons is the fact that the total traffic earnings of the American railways in 1911 1 B. S. Winchell, Atlantic Monthly, December, 1912. 114 SOCIALIZED GERMANY (exclusive of passenger traffic) was $2,168,000,000, or $23.35 per capita, or $116.75 per family of five persons. During the same year the total freight earnings of the German railways were $516,303,000, or $8 per capita, or $40 per family of five persons. This is the relative burden of railway freight charges in the two countries. In Germany, freight trans- portation costs each person about one-third as much as it costs the average American, despite the alleged lower ton-mile charges in this country. In addition, it should be borne in mind that the German railways contribute $160,000,000 a year in profits which are used for the relief of taxation, which is included in the traffic burden of the German consumer. As against this, however, there should be deducted the taxes paid by the American railways to the State and National Government which taxes are not paid in Germany. This but indicates the difficulty of arriving at any exact basis for the comparison of freight rates in the two countries. There are so many factors involved that are not included in the comparison. It may at least be claimed for the German system that all of the earnings go to the state in some form or other. There are no watered securities, no favored con- tractors, no semicriminal financing, and no attempt to exploit an industry or a community for the benefit of stockholders. I have travelled many thousand miles on the THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 115 German railways during the past twenty years and never, so far as I can remember, were the trains more than a few minutes late upon arrival or de- parture and I have always been able to secure a seat. The average rate of fare for a second-class ticket, which is a better service than the ordinary coach in America, is 1.8 cents, while the third-class tickets average 1.1 cent a mile. The first-class rate is 2.5 cents a mile. An additional charge is made on express-trains which range from 6 cents to 50 cents, depending on the distance and the class in which the person travels. The head of the state railways in Prussia is the minister of public works, a permanent salaried official appointed by the King. The principal supervisory authorities are the Bundesrat, or Im- perial Senate, and the Reicheisenbahn Amt, the members of which are appointed by the Emperor. The latter body exercises general supervision over the entire system and sees that the various regu- lations and enactments are carried out. In spite of the fact that the railways are owned by the individual states the administration is under imperial control. There is no conflict between the various states. "The Constitution of 1871 provided for uniform operation of the railways as part of a co-ordinated system. That instrument specially reserved to the Empire the right to exercise supervision over all 116 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the railways and legislate regarding them in the twofold interest of national defense and general traffic facilities. The Federal Governments are re- quired to administer the railways of the country as a uniform system in the interest of the general con- venience and in furtherance of this idea to con- struct new lines when necessary. Provision is also made for the interchange of through traffic and to this end for the interchange of rolling stock. The central government may construct or authorize the construction of new railways in any federal state, even against its will, and it may even exercise the right of expropriation. "Before nationalization there were 600 different sets of rates without counting preferential rates applying to special cases. After long negotiations the several state administrations have agreed upon the rate question, and since 1910 rates for passengers have been uniform and those for goods virtually so. " 1 In railway matters the Bundesrat, or Senate of the empire, acts under general instructions agreed upon by the federated governments, and the mo- tives of operation agreed upon, are as follows: (1) To assist internal industry and agriculture by cheapening the cost of raw materials or equip- ment for production. (2) To facilitate export of German products. (3) To support the trade of German commercial centres. (4) To favor German railways against competing foreign waterways and railways. 2 1 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 46. 2 E. Roberts, "German Railway Policy," Scribner's Magazine, February, 1911. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 117 General railway conferences are called from time to time by the Bundesrat, in which the various systems have votes according to their respective mileage, there being 1 vote for a railroad of from 31 to 93 miles; 2 votes from 93 to 186 miles, etc. A permanent rate commission prepares the business for the conference. There is a subdivision of mem- bership called the traders' committee, consisting of five representatives of agriculture, five of manufac- turing interests, and five of distributing and com- mercial interests. These are elected by the cham- bers of commerce and the boards of agriculture of the country, and these fifteen, together with a member from the Bavarian government, recommend to the permanent commission authoritatively "any adjustment of rates equitably among the zones of traffic into which the empire is apportioned, so that a shipper in one part of the country shall not be at a disadvantage in internal trade through his geographi- cal location." 1 The central railway office organizes and controls the rolling stock and equipment of the railways and serves as a centre for administration, from which technical improvements are initiated, weighed, and, when approved, are pressed on the railway ad- ministrations of the various states. There is also a series of district advisory councils, or committees, composed of representatives of the great economic interests. For the rest, each state manages its own *E. Roberts, Scribner's Magazine, February, 1911. 118 SOCIALIZED GERMANY lines and, as far as possible, regulates its policy ac- cording to what it considers the best interests of its own population and territory. 1 So far as the shipper is concerned, the railways of Germany are all one system. There is no struggle for traffic, no conflict over territory, no dispute with the state. "It is a striking fact," says Dawson, "that at present over 31,000 miles (in 1907) of railways (either railways belonging to the state or private lines managed by the state, though mostly the former), representing over six hundred million pounds of invested capital, are working with perfect smooth- ness and success without the aid of boards of direc- tors, private capitalists, meetings of shareholders, who, as a consequence, are able to employ their activities in other and more advantageous ways." 2 Even an exhaustive enumeration of the service activities of the German railways gives but a partial idea of the extent to which they contribute to the industrial life of the nation. The railways are an integral part of the empire. This is the most im- portant thing. They function as part of its life just as do the roads and highways, just as does the circulatory system of the human body. In place of a conflict with the nation, the states, and the cities over every possible question, the railways anticipate the needs of the community and provide for them. 1 Dawson, Industrial Germany, p. 53. 2 Dawson, Evolution of Modern Germany, p. 208. THE STATE-OWNED RAILWAYS 119 Where differences of opinion arise, the adjustment is on the basis of the public interest, the questions involved being discussed from this point of view alone. Instead of a struggle on the part of stock- holders and directors to secure the maximum of profits or dividends, the struggle of the state officials and chambers of commerce is to secure the maxi- mum of service, either in accommodation to the public or in profits to the state. There is thus a unity of purpose, the only debated questions being those of state policy. Another advantage arising from state ownership is the divorce of the railways from politics. There are no stockholders, directors, or attorneys in the Reichstag, the legislatures of the states, or the coun- cils of the cities. They make no campaign con- tributions and are not influential with the press. They carry on no publicity bureaus and maintain no expensive lobby. Railway legislation is considered with an eye single to the public service. This is a great gain, possibly the greatest gain of all. That Germany is not inherently free from the activity of private interests in politics is seen from the influ- ence of the agrarian or Junker class in Prussia and the empire. It is seen to a lesser degree in the class legislation of the big taxpayers and house owners of the cities. The general honesty and disinterested- ness of the German official is not alone attributable to the traditions of the country. It is found as well 120 SOCIALIZED GERMANY in the fact that much of the privileged wealth which in this country is in private hands is owned in Germany by the state. This of itself has excluded corrupt influences from public life and in so doing has purified the source from which much of the corruption in America has come. CHAPTER VIII CANALS, WATERWAYS, AND FREE PORTS WATERWAY development, as a means of cheapen- ing freights and the development of inland centres, has gone hand in hand with the extension of the railways, and in recent years the waterways have been receiving the greatest attention. This is re- markable in view of the immense profits which the state receives from the operation of the railways, which profits have undoubtedly been materially reduced by water competition. The programme of waterway development has been thought out for many years to come and on a most elaborate scale. It includes the linking up of all the great ports of ocean entry with the rivers and inland centres by ship canals and river systems, capable of carrying very heavy traffic. In addition, splendid harbors have been built along the Rhine, and on the North and Baltic Seas, with free ports at Hamburg, Bremen, and Liibeck. A network of canals is to unite the Rhine, the Danube, the Oder, the Weser, and the Meuse of sufficient dimensions to carry large craft. Already the register of canal- boats has been raised from 150 to 600 tons. Trans- portation by canals and rivers is closely integrated 121 122 SOCIALIZED GERMANY with the railways through splendidly equipped ter- minals, which facilitate the easy transshipment of freight from one to the other, while the larger towns on the rivers and ocean harbors have built the most completely equipped docks and warehouses for the development of trade and industry. 1 Cheap water transportation is another explana- tion of Germany's industrial progress. It has been planned with the same far-seeing intelligence that characterized the railway system, with which it is closely related in its administration. Some idea of the magnitude of the water traffic is evidenced by the fact that while the total goods carried in 1911 upon the railways aggregated 408,879,000 tons, the goods upon the waterways totalled 76,632,000 tons, or more than one-sixth of the amount carried by rail. The total navigable waterways in the empire amount to 8,600 miles, one-fourth of which, or 2,200 miles, are in canals or canalized streams. During twenty- five years Prussia alone has spent $250,000,000 on canal undertakings. A comprehensive imperial waterway programme was authorized in 1905. It includes two great undertakings: one, the Rhine- Weser project for a canal to connect the former river with the Dortmund- Ems Canal, from the latter to the Weser, the en- largement of other canals, and the canalization of the river Lippe, the estimated cost of which was $62,687,- 1 See chapter IX. CANALS, WATERWAYS, AND FREE PORTS 123 500. The second, the Oder project, includes the building of a ship canal from Berlin to Stettin, at a cost of $10,750,000; improvements in the water- ways from the Oder to the Vistula, at a cost of $5,290,000; connections with Breslau, costing $4,- 937,500; and various other plans. The total esti- mated cost of these two undertakings is $83,750,000, which sum, however, will be greatly exceeded. When these projects are completed, the Rhine will be connected with the Weser in the east, the Danube in the south, and the Meuse in the west. The rivers Elbe, Oder, and Vistula are already con- nected, and the canal now being built from the Rhine to Hanover will probably be continued to the Elbe. Other proposed waterways are a canal from the Neckar to the Danube, to cost $27,500,000, and a 64-mile canal from the Danube at Ulm to Lake Constance, to cost $20,000,000. There are great engineering difficulties in these projects, in the first case a difference in level of 900 feet, and in the second 540 feet, but these will be overcome. One of the most colossal undertakings proposed is the opening of the river Rhine to the sea in German territory. The Rhine now enters the North Sea in Holland, and an enormous amount of German traffic is handled at Rotterdam and Amsterdam, which it is desired to divert to German seaports. An influential association has actively promoted this idea. 124 SOCIALIZED GERMANY The most notable features in the act of 1905, authorizing the Rhine- Weser and Oder projects, are the wide powers of expropriation of adjoining land reserved to the government and the provision for a state monopoly of the towing service on the Rhine- Weser Canal and its branches. In view of the improvements in transit facilities on the main rivers (Rhine, Oder, Weser) and some of their tributaries, the Agrarian party, which has opposed waterway development because of fear of agricultural competition, insisted that dues be paid "on rivers regulated in the interest of navigation." Prussia promised this amendment without consult- ing the other states, although it involved an altera- tion in the constitution, which expressly prohibits dues on the natural waterways of the country. But the constitution was changed and the other states were induced to acquiesce, Bavaria, for example, by the promised canalization of the Main. The plans include a river board for each river, upon which all the principal interests concerned should be repre- sented, and the dues to be charged were to be uni- form on all the rivers. The government claims the purpose of the dues is not to earn surpluses for the state, but to cover actual costs by an "inconsider- able addition to freightage rates." In the construction of these great canal projects "rivers are crossed, ascents and descents of hun- dreds of feet are made with facility, and ships lifted CANALS, WATERWAYS, AND FREE PORTS 125 and lowered bodily in troughs instead of by the old and slow method of locks." l So comprehensive is the waterway development that goods can be sent from the mouth of the Rhine direct into Switzerland and the south of France in one direction, and to Wurtemberg, Bavaria, and Austria in another. Merchandise bought in Ham- burg can be despatched by river and canal every yard of the way from that port to Berlin, or even to Silesia in the extreme south of Prussia. The canals have made Berlin, 400 miles from the sea, a great port, second only to the North Sea ports, and three cities on the Rhine. Before long, Berlin will be in touch with the Rhine in the far west and the Danube in the south. Berlin's in and out traffic in 1910 amounted to 5,750,000 tons, to which should be added the traffic of the suburban towns, exceed- ing 3,000,000 tons. Between Berlin and all the im- portant towns accessible by river and canal regular sailings are arranged; e, cents, sometimes with an ad- ditional charge for a transfer. In some cities the zone system is followed with a minimum charge of 2J^ cents for about 2J^ miles, with an additional charge of 1 cent for the maximum ride, even when the line extends out into the country. Cheap season tickets are frequently sold to workmen and school children. In some cities working men's tickets are sold for 12 cents a week for two journeys daily, available during the early morning and in the eve- ning. Public ownership of the electricity supply is very common. As in England, the municipalities had generally granted concessions to private companies for the gas supply, but when electricity became a commercial product municipal authorities generally MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 287 undertook the building and operation of the plants. Within recent years a movement has developed for the erection of large central generating stations owned and operated by a number of local commu- nities, or by communities working with private en- terprises. These central plants distribute power and light over a large area. One of the largest of these stations is at Essen, which supplies more than fifty communities and covers an area of 2,300 square miles in its service. The city of Munich owns 51 per cent, of capital in the company organized to obtain electric power from a stream in the Alps, while the balance of the capital is subscribed by individuals. Nearly all of the cities own their own slaughter- houses. In fact this is an activity carried on by public agencies in almost every country of the world, with the exception of England and America. Con- nected with the abattoirs are stock-yards to which the farmers bring their cattle for slaughter. Usually all of the meat sold in the city is required to be prepared in the public slaughter-houses, private abattoirs being prohibited. The most elaborate sys- tem of inspection is provided, the inspectors being public officials who have taken a special training as veterinary surgeons. The fees for slaughtering are fixed on a basis sufficient to meet the operating costs and interest charges as well as the ultimate repay- ment of the cost of the structures by means of a sinking fund. 288 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Mpst of the large towns also own their markets. In the larger cities a series of markets are operated in connection with the central one, to which vege- tables and farm products are brought to be dis- posed of by auction to dealers. In addition there are many open morning markets in the streets which are subsequently cleared for traffic. Market dealers are subject to supervision to see that the food offered is clean and wholesome, and that the charges are reasonable. Regulations are also en- acted to control prices for the purpose of preventing monopoly or extortion. Many towns supply milk as a means of reduc- ing infant mortality. In Berlin the milk provided by the nine children's dispensaries is produced on municipal farms. Dortmund has a municipal dairy, while other towns have co-operative organi- zations for the supply of pure milk under public regulation. During the shortage of meat in 1911 and 1912 many cities took steps to reduce the cost of meat and fish. Over two hundred towns entered into con- tracts for the purchase of foreign meat, which was either sold by the municipality directly or through butchers at stipulated prices. By this means the cost of meat was reduced from 20 to 30 per cent. Similar measures were taken for the purchase and sale of fish and vegetables. 1 By these and other 1 Dawson, supra, p. 246. MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 289 means the German city controls the cost of living and insures the quality offered for sale. Waste is reduced to a minimum, as is the chance of monopoly and extortion. In addition the parcel post is widely used by housewives who give standing orders to farmers, who mail meat, poultry, vegetables, and flowers daily from their farms many miles away. This is characteristic of the thoroughness and watch- fulness of German municipal life. Savings-banks have been operated by German cities for centuries. They encourage thrift and sup- ply a financial reservoir for the carrying on of public activities. The savings-banks do a checking busi- ness, as do the postal-banks. Over 90 per cent, of the savings in Germany are in public institutions of one kind or another. The banks are managed by an official of the city at practically no cost to the depositors who receive back the full earnings on their money which is invested in public securities, or a limited number of public-utility enterprises of a social character. Insurance is also provided. Sometimes it is offered by the state, as in Bavaria, but more fre- quently it is carried on by the city. Berlin, Ham- burg, and other towns have fire-insurance societies, while in the country districts groups of commu- nities have organized for mutual insurance against accident liability. Frankfort has insured itself against accidents since 1888, and it is estimated 290 SOCIALIZED GERMANY that from $45,000 to $50,000 has been saved during twenty years as a result of this action. Describing the municipal insurance companies, Mr. W. H. Dawson says: "The usual method of operations (in municipal fire insurance societies) is for the town to form a com- pany for the purpose, providing all the necessary capital, carrying on the business as an ordinary public enterprise, taking all risks, and receiving all profits. In 1910 the total value of property insured in public insurance enterprises was $18,905,000,000, of which $16,785,000,000 represented immovable property. The year's net profits were $3,350,000 and the accumulated funds stood at $63,320,000." 1 Most towns maintain pawn-shops for the relief of the poor in times of distress. These banks charge from 1 to 3 per cent, a month, depending upon the size of the loan and the security offered. They are also used by small tradesmen to carry over unsea- sonable goods or to otherwise aid them in the trans- action of their business. The municipal savings-banks are of great aid to the cities in carrying out the undertakings in which they are engaged. They finance the housing and land speculation projects, the purchase of public- service corporations, and the like. The total de- posits in municipal savings institutions in 55 large towns in 1910 amounted to $850,000,000. Mort- 1 Dawson, supra, p. 252. MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 291 gage banks to aid persons of small means in the pur- chase of land or the erection of homes are also main- tained. Large sums have been set aside for this purpose in recent years. Dresden has made an ap- propriation of $2 1, 500,000 for this purpose, Diissel- dorf of $10,000,000, and Aix-la-Chapelle of $5 ; - 000,000. These mortgage banks make loans on first mort- gages up to from 60 per cent, to 75 per cent, of the value of the property at rates of interest ranging from 3J^ per cent, to 4J^ per cent. Second-mort- gage loans are also made, but at a higher rate of interest. In order to take advantage of municipal loans house owners must first join the association and make a deposit of $125. After a year they are entitled to secure a loan. Investigations made in 1913 by the city of Munich showed that 223 munic- ipal savings-banks had loaned money to the amount of $775,000,000 on first mortgages at a rate of from 4J^ per cent, to 4% per cent. 1 An estimate was made by the Imperial Ministry of Finance in 1908 of all towns and rural communities with more than 10,000 inhabitants and it was found that the total receipts from undertakings of all kinds those carried on without special regard for profit as well as those conducted upon strictly com- mercial principles amounted in the aggregate to $126,750,000, or 26 per cent, of all communal re- 1 Dawson, supra, p. 251. 292 SOCIALIZED GERMANY ceipts. Industrial services are generally operated at a profit, sometimes a very substantial profit, although this is not the main motive of operation. The largest contributions to the city treasury came from the gas, electric works, and tramways. Substantial relief to the taxpayers is one of the gains from these activities. "The aggregate profits on gas works available in 1910-1911 for the reduction of taxation in seventy- two German towns with 50,000 inhabitants or more, were $13,018,500. . . . Again net profits available for the reduction of taxes were made on electricity works in 1910-1911 by seventy-two German towns with 50,000 inhabitants or more, having a combined population of 14,116,000 to the amount of $9,089,- 500. . . . Taking finally the profits from the tram- ways available for the relief of local burdens, the amount yielded in 1910 in seventy-four German towns with 50,000 inhabitants or over was $3,- 590,000." * The total amounts received as profits to be used for the relief of taxation in a number of the larger cities in 1910 were as follows: Berlin, population 2,071,800, gas-works $1,939,900, water-works $705,- 100, and tramways $42,750; Breslau, population 512,100, gas-works $659,050, electric-works $310,500, water-works $263,200; Cologne, population 516,500, gas-works $328,650, electric-works $274,950, water- works $283,850, and tramways $292,400, or a total 1 Dawson, supra, p. 217. MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 293 of $1, 179,850. Dresden, population 548,300, makes an even better showing. It also owns all of its public- service utilities. The gas-works earned $782,000, electric-works $400,250, water-works $45,650, and tramways $271,800, or a total of $1,499,700. Frank- fort-on-the-Main does not own its gas service, but the electric-works yielded $725,400, the water-works $170,900, and the tramways $368,550. Including the royalties from the gas-works, the net receipts from the public-service corporations were $1,426,- 300 for the year. Nuremberg, population 333,200, owns all the public utilities, and received (1910) a total contribution for the relief of taxation of $61,700, while Munich, population 596,500, which also owns all its public utilities, enjoyed a total income from these sources of $1,110,100. Taking twelve of the larger cities, with a combined population of 7,464,- 300, it appears that the net profits amounted to $17,- 107,300, or an equivalent of $2.30 per capita. 1 The profits referred to are the net earnings after all payments have been made for interest, deprecia- tion, redemption of capital, and additions to re- newals and reserve funds. The profits are also in- dependent of any payments on account of paving and street cleaning and local taxes. As a consequence of the policy of municipal socialism the indebtedness of the average German city is very high, but as an offset a large part of the 1 Dawson, supra, p. 223. 294 SOCIALIZED GERMANY indebtedness is for undertakings which are self-sup- porting and involve no burden to taxpayers, whereas the indebtedness of the average American city is for the most part for streets, sewers, parks, schools, playgrounds, and fire and police equipment, which are non-revenue producing. The indebtedness of the German cities is very largely of a profit-making sort. The following figures of seven Prussian cities for the year 1908 are indicative of the extent to which their indebtedness is for productive undertakings. The " productive undertakings" enumerated include street railway, gas, electric light, water, harbors, baths, etc. The "other purposes" are schools, streets, sewers, and all non-productive undertakings. TOWN POPULA- TION TOTAL DEBT FOR PRODUC- TIVE UNDER- TAKINGS OTHER PURPOSES Berlin 2,001,032 $99,254,000 $64,767,000 $34,512,000 Elberfeld.... Halle Solingen Magdeburg. . Remscheid. . . Diisseldorf . . . 168,000 176,798 50,961 247,358 69,700 284,439 13,595,000 9,500,000 3,285,000 15,005,000 3,930,000 28,585,000 7,252,000 2,877,000 2,257,000 7,775,000 2,790,000 22,260,000 6,392,600 4,612,000 1,029,000 7,503,900 1,147,000 6,327,000 A similar table of the indebtedness of seven Amer- ican cities shows the amount as well as the distri- bution of indebtedness between productive and un- productive agencies. 1 1 Financial Statistics of Cities, 1909. Bureau of the Census. MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 295 TOWN POPULA- TION 1910 INDEBTED- NESS 1909 FOR PRO- DUCTIVE PURPOSES FOR OTHER PURPOSES Philadelphia- Cleveland Minneapolis.. Indianapolis. . Denver Omaha 1,526,383 538,374 294,330 228,690 207,112 122,187 $99,355,026 37,304,908 14,927,202 4,790,401 5,814,419 8,598,997 $30,776,642 5,613,684 1,933,424 22,000 329,200 $68,578,384 31,691,224 12,993,778 4,768,401 5,485,219 Grand Rapids 110,060 3,184,612 1,137,500 2,047,112 Herein is one explanation of the protest against municipal indebtedness in this country. Our in- debtedness is "dead" indebtedness. It yields no return. It is a burden to the taxpayers. And it is growing rapidly. The German city, on the other hand, has no fear of indebtedness, for it is usually represented by profit-making properties. It is recognized as good business for the city to go into debt, especially where a financial return may reason- ably be expected from the investment, either im- mediatedly or in the future. Nowhere is Germany seen to such good advantage as in the city. All classes have a pride in its life, activities, and achievements; they contribute will- ingly in taxes for efficient administration and seem to appraise the returns received in education, com- fort, and happiness, and to be content with the in- vestment. Business men on the council give un- reservedly of their time and treat the trust reposed in them as a high honor worthy of the best service they can render. And for the most part their 296 SOCIALIZED GERMANY actions are disinterested. They have no prejudice against any kind of undertaking if it will improve the city or make it more attractive to business, residents, or tourists. Nor do they hesitate to incur heavy indebtedness for activities which will yield returns either for the relief of taxation or the better- ment of the community. The average per-capita indebtedness of cities of over 200,000 people is $85, a sum far in excess of that of America. Many cities have a much higher debt. Frankfort carries a municipal indebtedness of $140 per capita, Munich $125, Diisseldorf $130, and Charlottenburg $130. In comparison the per-capita debt of Chicago is but $43.90, of Cleveland $69.29, of Detroit $30.31, of Washington $44.84, of Milwaukee $32.47, of Philadelphia $65.09. In this alone we see one ex- planation of the difference between the German city and our own. The German city spends gener- ously. Officials treat the city as a business man does his business, and they spend accordingly. And back of this financial and social policy is a different conception of the city from that which prevails in other countries, and especially that which prevails in America. Our conception of the city is that it is a police agency. It is this and little more. Expenditures and activities are directed to the protection of business and the safeguarding of the individual. We spend generously for our police and fire departments, for streets and sewers, MUNICIPAL SOCIALISM 297 for schools, and to an increasing extent for parks, playgrounds, and health. But the idea of service is as yet rudimentary. We have consciously re- frained from entering the field of profit-making ser- vice (except in the case of the water and electricity supply) on the theory that this was not a proper sphere of public activity. Germany has a far wider vision of the city. The welfare of the community, of all the people, of all business rather than a few businesses, is the standard by which a proposal is measured. CHAPTER XXII THE BUILDING OF CITIES TOWN-PLANNING is another achievement born of the expert and of state socialism. It is a recognition of the permanency of the city, as well as its impor- tance. Town-planning is a recent art. It is scarcely a quarter of a century old. And during these years Germany has produced the most wonderful cities of modern times. This is the more remarkable because these were years of rapid industrial devel- opment in which we would have expected business interests to have insisted upon the utmost freedom of action and the necessity for non-interference on the part of the community. Apparently, however, it was a recognition of the dangers incident to un- controlled development that led to the control of property and its conscious direction by the city authorities in order that the health and well-being of the people should be protected. Here again the German city reflects the far-sighted statesmanship that characterizes the empire; a statesmanship that is responsible for the social legislation, education, and state socialism which are so closely related to the development of the state. Even the casual traveller remarks on the differ- 298 THE BUILDING OF CITIES 299 ence in city conditions as he enters Germany from Holland, Belgium, France, or Austria. Whether he enters at Cologne, Frankfort, or Munich, or comes by sea to Hamburg or Bremen a new type of city greets the eye. As he leaves the railway station, which is usually one of the most commanding structures in the city, he finds everything clean and well ordered; the streets are paved with the best of material and are kept in splendid repair. There are no disfiguring telegraph wires overhead and few obtrusive signs or bill-boards to offend the eye. There is no smoke or dirt, while a uniform building line indicates the existence of municipal by-laws for the control of buildings. The streets are fre- quently parked before the houses, which are often ornamented with window-boxes, while at intervals small parks or open spaces are found, beautified with flowers and statuary. Monumental public build- ings adorn the city, usually grouped in an intelli- gent orderly way, while round about the city are great gardens, parks, or woods in which on Sundays or holidays a large percentage of the people may be seen at play. Even the tenements, which are the almost universal form of dwelling, do not sug- gest the ugly squalor of the English or American town, in spite of the fact that nearly 80 per cent, of the urban population lives amid surroundings that are far from conducive to the health and well- being of the people. 300 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Apparently nothing is left to chance. Everything is under control. The city suggests a conscious directing intelligence that looks out from the Rath- haus as a group of architects might plan a world's fair; as engineers might design a war-ship; as an in- dividual erects a great office-building. Everything suggests intelligence, oversight, and the application of art and science to the city's building. The German city is planned with all these ends in view. Whereas other countries have left the growth of the city to the unregulated action of in- dividual initiative, Germany has recognized that the civilization of to-day is a city civilization and that the city should be built as a permanent thing. Officials realize that the license of land specula- tors, builders, and factory owners not only impairs the beauty of the city, but interferes with the com- fort and convenience of others as well. Town-planning had its beginning with the city- widening projects made necessary by the rapid urban growth of a quarter of a century ago, when population broke over the lines of fortifications which surrounded the old towns and began to spread out into the surrounding country. In South Germany and especially along the Rhine, the cities were surrounded with walls and fortifications which congested population within very narrow quarters. In addition many towns like Cologne, Frankfort, Nuremberg, Bremen, and Hamburg had been capital THE BUILDING OF CITIES 301 cities, or rich trading centres with long traditions of municipal pride born of previous independence or notable acheveiments. The streets were narrow and crooked. They were not suited to modern traffic or the building of street-railway lines. Streets had to be widened, beautiful old buildings were in dan- ger of impairment, fine vistas might be destroyed. About this time, too, sanitary precautions began to be taken to protect the health of the community, while the evils of bad housing began to appear. To meet the needs of a rapidly growing population builders began the erection of tenements differing but little from the overcrowded lodgings of earlier times. Land speculators laid out their property so as to secure the maximum return from its sale with no concern for the comfort, convenience, or well- being of the community. These were the conditions which confronted municipal authorities in the early eighties. Out of these necessities the art of town- planning had its birth. Town-planning, or Stddtebau, has now become a recognized art. A number of universities offer courses of study on the subject which attract stu- dents preparing for a municipal career. Special courses have been offered in Berlin since 1907. In Saxony a similar department has existed since 1910. In 1912 a college of administration was opened in Diisseldorf with courses on the subject. In 1910 an elaborate town-planning exposition was held in 302 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Berlin, and two years later a similar exposition was held in Dlisseldorf . A large literature has appeared upon the subject, while a periodical, Der Stddtebau, is published. The attitude of the average town is indicated by the planning announcement of the city of Mann- heim, which states that "every town in course of development needs to its extension outward a uniform and comprehensive building plan. If this plan is to offer a foundation for the art of town building it must be drawn up on large lines, must anticipate the needs of a distant future, and pay due regard to the requirements of traffic, hygiene, and taste. The fulfilment of this task constitutes a very important part of all social reform in our towns. " 1 This is indicative of the outlook of all city offi- cials and statesmen. Cities like Berlin, Diisseldorf, Strasburg, and Munich have held competitions in which town-planning experts from all over the em- pire competed. Specifications were first laid down by the authorities which anticipated the future growth of the city for years to come. The specifi- cations were limited to the development of specified territory to be developed, or provided for a plan for the entire city and surrounding territory. Com- petitors were asked to design the traffic streets, boulevards, parks, and open spaces, so that they 1 Dawson, supra, p. 142. THE BUILDING OF CITIES 303 would fit into the existing city plan. Provision was to be made for steam railways, harbors, and indus- trial districts, for the location and character of public buildings and schools, as well as hospitals, cemeteries, and other public needs. With these specifications before them, plans were prepared by competitors upon which an award was subsequently made. In other instances cities employ experts who pre- pare the city-widening projects in advance of build- ing. When received, the plans are exhibited for pub- lic inspection and criticism and when finally approved they become binding not only upon the community but upon private builders and landowners as well. Underlying all city plans is the proper arrange- ment of streets. This is the foundation of the city. It is elementary to any city plan. Streets are recog- nized as being the circulatory system of the city, too important to be left to the narrow commercial interests of private landowners or speculators. And the modern streets in the German city, are de- signed with the greatest care. They are adjusted to the uses to which they are to be put. They are not all alike, each 40 or 60 feet wide and arranged according to the rectangular plan so common in America. An effort is made to design streets for particular needs and uses. Certain streets should be wide, spacious, and park-like. These are the main arteries of traffic. Such streets are frequently from 150 to 200 feet wide. In the centre is a parked 304 SOCIALIZED GERMANY space with gardens to be used for pedestrians. On either side are the street-car tracks, sodded so as to keep down the dirt and the noise. Outside are the traffic thoroughfares. These are the main ar- teries of circulation. They usually run out from the centre of the city like the spokes of a wheel or form the boulevard system about the circumference of the city. On such streets builders are required to set their houses back a uniform distance from the pavement. Here only detached houses can be built, which must be a certain distance apart and must not exceed a certain height. Less prominent streets are narrower, more cosey and picturesque in their planning. They are intended for residential pur- poses. Frequently they are crooked; they come to a dead end as in mediaeval towns. This is done to discourage traffic. It also lends quiet and charm. Other districts are dedicated to industrial uses. These sections are not arbitrarily chosen, they are located near the railways, waterways, or harbors. Where possible they are selected with due regard to the prevailing winds on the lee side of the town so that the smoke will be driven from the city rather than across it. These industrial districts are also planned with respect to the uses to which they are put. Similar ordinances are enacted to control builders with the aim of securing architectural harmony, the proper kind and location of houses, the prevention THE BUILDING OF CITIES 305 of bad housing conditions, and the protection of the whole community from disfigurement. These, with the planning of the streets and the restriction of areas to specified uses, are known as the " zoning system." The city is divided into districts accord- ing to its proper use. In each zone there are different limitations as to the amount of land that may be built upon, the amount of open space required, the height of buildings and the distance they must be set back from the street. The building plans also indicate the kind of houses that may be erected, whether villas or apartments. The individual land- owner would not think of laying out his property for sale without first consulting the city plans. The widening plans of the suburban area of the city of Ulm provide that 17 per cent, of the land should first be taken for streets, that 13 per cent, of the lot area should be reserved for back gardens, and 50 per cent, for front gardens. Only 20 per cent, of the lot area may be covered by buildings. The city of Mannheim is divided into three building zones. In the business district 60 per cent, of the land may be covered by structures which must not exceed three stories in height. In the next outer zone 50 per cent, of the lot area may be built upon, while the structures may not exceed four stories in height. In the outlying sections three stories is the limit, while a similar percentage of the land may be built upon. 306 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Cologne provides that only 75 per cent, of the land may be built upon in the business section, 65 per cent, in the next two outer zones, while in the suburban residence district only 50 per cent, may be covered. In the business district of Frankfort 75 per cent, of the land may be covered by buildings which may not exceed five stories or more than 65 feet in height. In the second outer zone buildings may be four stories high, but never higher than the width of the street. For the third surburban zone two stories is the limit. As a result of these restrictions architectural har- mony is insured. There are no sky-scrapers or apart- ment-houses close beside the detached dwelling. Nor is one owner permitted to build close to the street-line, while his neighbor, more thoughtful of the community, places his house back from the street. All houses are located the same distance from the curb-line, while the sky-line is uniform and rarely exceeds the width of the street. As a conse- quence the newer sections of the German city pre- sent a park-like appearance; they have something of the beauty of the garden cities of England. All of this is sanctioned as a means of protecting prop- erty. It insures to the home builder that for years to come his property will be protected from the in- trusion of business, tenements, or other objection- able structures. In planning new territory provision is made for THE BUILDING OF CITIES 307 the needs of the city as a whole. At frequent intervals there are little gardens or play places which are designed in an artistic way. Some of the gardens are sunken, others are just off the street- line so as not to interfere with through traffic. Sites are also reserved for future public buildings, for schools, hospitals, and churches. For these pur- poses cities acquire land in advance of their needs at very little cost and with adequate provision for the future. The community is also protected by ordinance from signs and other street disfigurements. Most of the public announcements are placed on kiosks located in prominent places which are either operated by the city or leased out to private individuals. Stations and tram-cars are frequently free from ad- vertisements. The power to legislate against such disfigurement rests in an old law of Prussia which provides that buildings which disfigure the appear- ance of the city may be prohibited under the police powers of the city. A law enacted in 1907 carried this principle still further and authorized the city to refuse its permission to the erection of any build- ings that would unnecessarily disfigure streets and public places, and local authorities are authorized to adopt by-laws for the protection of the archi- tectural appearance of leading streets or ancient historical places. Under these by-laws the erection of bill-boards and signs depends upon police per- 308 SOCIALIZED GERMANY mission, but before permission is granted the opinion of experts or the municipal authorities must be taken. 1 Commenting on these regulations, Mr. Dawson says: "Many Prussian towns have gone further and have established special municipal offices for advice to builders and architects upon matters of style and taste. No charge is made and there is theoret- ically no obligation to follow the advice given unless the builder's plans infringe upon the local regulations, yet the good offices of the municipality are both freely used and highly valued. The municipality of Baden-Baden adds rewards to advice, for it gives premiums every year to architects and builders whose erections are adjudged to comply most nearly with certain prescribed conditions as to artistic design and quality of materials, and best harmonize with the general architectural scheme of the town. By the adoption of these and similar common-sense methods, and by insisting that the building, like the planning of the town, should be considered as a whole, it is hoped to prevent the architectural anarchy which has often reigned in the past, and even to rectify many mistakes which have been in- herited from times when the building speculator was left to his own devices. The amenity of civic life in Germany is further protected by a law, ap- plying to the whole country, providing that before industrial or trading undertakings which would cause injury or even inconvenience to the neighbor- ing residents can be established, the consent of the higher state authorities must be obtained. 7 ' 2 1 Dawson, supra, p. 154. 2 Dawson, supra, p. 155. THE BUILDING OF CITIES 309 The same intelligent provision is made for indus- try and commerce that is made for the residence districts. German cities vie with one another, much as do the cities of America. They compete for factories, for residences, for people. And as an aid in this competition cities make provision for factory sites and transportation. The cities of Mannheim, Bremen, Emden, Frankfort-on-the- Main, and many other towns have purchased large tracts of land to be resold to industries on easy terms. These factory areas are usually selected close by the railways and waterways, and are ac- quired at farm prices. Thereafter streets are laid out, transportation connections are made, and the property is placed upon the market. This is part of the comprehensive industrial policy of Germany, a policy that is very common. "The inquiry made by the Central Office of the Municipal Congress showed that nearly half of the 113 municipal authorities questioned had ac- quired land for industrial purposes and had sys- tematically offered it to capitalists on advantageous conditions, and that in many cases their land was in communication with the municipal docks. It appeared that in one case the town sold land at half the cost price solely with a view to attracting new industries, while in others mortgages on the land sold were accepted at a low rate of interest. "* One of the most elaborate undertakings of this kind is that of Frankfort-on-the-Main, a city of 414,- 1 Dawson, supra, p. 241. 310 SOCIALIZED GERMANY 000 people. Some years ago 1,180 acres of land on the river Main was purchased at agricultural prices, which has subsequently been developed into a great industrial and factory centre. In con- nection with the project a great harbor was laid out, the river was deepened, and connections were made with the state-owned railways. The total cost of the undertaking is estimated at $18,000,- 000, but the land is now being sold and leased to builders at figures which are expected not only to entirely reimburse the city for the cost of the land, but for the cost of the improvements as well. New factories are not permitted to go where they will. They are required by law to locate in these new industrial sections. Such orders are not made arbitrarily, however, nor is any injustice done to landowners. Factory sections are chosen by reason of natural advantages; they are close by the rail- ways and waterways, and are supplied with switches, spurs, and sidings which reduce the cost of trans- portation to a minimum. This is one of the ways by which Germany encourages industry. It stimulates competition, it offers a free play to enterprise by preventing private control of the means of trans- portation on the one hand and by offering the best of sites at very low cost on the other. In proximity to the factory districts land is laid out for working men's homes, and here the streets are planned with this object in view. Parks, play- THE BUILDING OF CITIES 311 grounds, and public baths are usually provided in the neighborhood, while the means of transporta- tion are frequently adjusted to the cheap and easy distribution of population. It is because of such well-ordered plans that the German city is what it is. Individualism and license are controlled in the public interest, while private property is subordinated to the public weal. Pres- ent speculative profits are of secondary importance to permanent values. Municipal officials build cities as the naval council erects dreadnaughts, as the minister of war plans his campaigns. To the convenience of industry and the comfort of the home owner and the tenant is added the pride of the city, a pride expressed in commanding public structures, in imposing water-fronts, beauti- ful parks and boulevards, and places of recreation. Diisseldorf, a city of 350,000 people, is known as the "Garden City of Germany." It has spent millions on the reclamation of its Rhine water-fronts, in the erection of a great exposition hall in which indus- trial, art, and municipal exhibits are held, in the acquisition of land and the laying out of public places. Nearly every Rhine city has developed its water-front not only as a means for water and freight traffic but for recreation as well. The embank- ments upon the river frontage are terraced. At the bottom are landing stages for water craft; on the next level are the railway tracks, while above is a 312 SOCIALIZED GERMANY broad promenade way or park which is used by the whole population. Berlin has parked its canals, which carry the most diversified commerce and has lined them with shade-trees. Dresden stands far above the river Elbe, upon the summits of whose banks great public buildings have been erected. Munich, Leipsic, Frankfort, and Dresden have expended immense sums in the erection of beauti- ful town halls, the older ones suggesting the archi- tecture of the Middle Ages and those more recently constructed the modern architecture of Germany. Cities own splendid opera-houses and theatres; many have zoological and palm gardens, while within the last few years cities have erected festival halls which are the favorite places of resort during the summer months. The exhibition halls and park of Munich cost $4,250,000, and those of Frankfort $1,500,000. They are used for industrial expositions, for the display of local art, as well as for music, theatrical performances, and other purposes. The German cities spend generously for beauty and for recreation, more generously than any cities in the world. All this is an expression not only of the affection of the people for their city, but of their patriotism and love of the Fatherland as well. CHAPTER XXIII MUNICIPAL LAND OWNERSHIP AND HOUSING PROJECTS CLOSELY related to town-planning are the land and housing policies adopted by the cities with the sanction of the state governments. During the Middle Ages towns and villages owned consider- able tracts of common land. Some of this was within the city limits; much of it was in agricul- tural and forest land, which was used for the gather- ing of fuel, grazing, and agricultural purposes. Common ownership of land by public authorities is almost universal in South Germany, some of the towns owning so much land that they are free from local taxes. In recent years cities have enlarged their landed possessions. They have been instructed to do so by the state authorities and directed to refuse to sell their holdings. The importance of land to planning and housing projects has been fully recog- nized, as has the possibility of using landed posses- sions for fiscal purposes. Orders or decrees have been issued by the cen- tral authorities of Prussia and Saxony pointing out 313 314 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the far-reaching importance of an adequate land policy in the solution of the housing problem, as well as in the control of land speculation, which is recognized as one of the most serious evils in modern city conditions. And as a means of checking specu- lation and the promotion of adequate housing facil- ities towns are urged to anticipate their growth and acquire surrounding agricultural land in advance of the city's development. The minister of the interior of Saxony has advised the towns "to in- crease their estates betimes to the extent of their power, yet to retain all land in their possession, and only to sell where there is a guarantee that no specu- lation will take place." When sold, public land is usually subject to limitations upon the buyer, who is prevented from speculating on his purchase or transferring the property so acquired to others. In some instances the town reserves the right to buy back the land, while in others the land is merely leased to the occupier. Many cities have engaged in large land schemes. Among them are Mannheim, Leipsic, Charlotten- burg, Breslau, Halle, Frankfort-on-the-Main, Aix- la-Chapelle, Diisseldorf, Duisburg, Essen, Elber- feld, Ulm, and Strasburg. The city of Diisseldorf set aside a fund of $5,750,000 with which to buy and sell real estate, just as does a private operator. The city frankly stated that one of the purposes of this policy was "to restrain the unnatural augmen- MUNICIPAL LAND OWNERSHIP 315 tation of the price of land." In addition the city owns a majority of the stock in a suburban street railway which is also a large operator in land specu- lation. By this means it keeps down the price of land for building purposes and at the same time shares in the unearned increment of land values due to the city's growth. It is quite customary for cities to buy agricul- tural land for industrial or housing purposes in anticipation of the laying out of streets or trans- portation lines. When the development has been determined upon the land is systematically planned, the streets are laid out, reservations are made for parks, playgrounds, and sites for public buildings, and the balance of the land is either sold or leased as the policy of the city dictates. Special induce- ments are made to working men, the land being sold at a low price and on long terms, the money for the building being also loaned either directly from municipal savings-banks or through co-opera- tive societies organized to promote the building of working men's houses. From 75 to 90 per cent, of the cost of the land and buildings is so advanced by the municipality at a rate of interest of from 2J/ to 4 per cent., which includes the amortization charges. Some towns claim that they have completely elim- inated land speculation. The ober-burgomaster of Ulm announced at a meeting that that city now 316 SOCIALIZED GERMANY owns four-fifths of the entire municipal area, and that in consequence there is no land speculation. The mayor of Saarbriicken says that in consequence of the land policy of that city the community itself has become a large land speculator. From reports made in 1910 it appears that cities own from 20 to 80 per cent, of their entire ad- ministrative areas, not including roads, streets, and railways. Among these cities Freiburg, in Baden, owns 77.7 per cent, of its area; Stettin 62.5 per cent.; Heidelberg 61.1 per cent.; Coblenz 69.5 per cent.; Augsburg 49 per cent. ; Mannheim 48.6 per cent. ; and Frankfort-on-the-Main 47.7 per cent. Berlin owns 5,450 acres within its limits, and 46,- 899 acres outside of its limits. Frankfort-on-the- Main owns a total of 15,522 acres; Breslau 16,795 acres; Munich 12,792 acres; Strasburg 11,464 acres; and Stettin 15,972 acres. A number of cities own estates several times greater than their adminis- trative areas. 1 During the twenty years from 1890 to 1909 the town of Konigsberg increased its estates by 3,000 acres. From 1891 to 1908 Munich added 13,771 acres. In the former city about one-half of the land so acquired was within the municipal boundaries and the other half outside, while in Munich something over one-third of the land acquired was within the city, while two-thirds were outside of it. 1 Dawson, supra, p. 125. MUNICIPAL LAND OWNERSHIP 317 There seems to be no limit to the ambitions of the towns in this direction. Kiel now owns a large part of the land surrounding the city which is let out in small holdings for market gardening, with the result that the town has between 4,000 and 5,000 tenants from whom it receives a substantial income each year. Berlin has been increasing its municipal estates with even greater rapidity and recently purchased a single estate of 15,000 acres at a cost of about $5,000,000. Part of this land is to be sold or leased for the building of small homes, but the greater part will be used as a public park. The towns of Konigsberg and Ulm have recently acquired the fortifications surrounding the city and laid them off as parks or for building pur- poses. Much of the land so acquired by the cities is kept as forest land. Of the total of 35,000,000 acres of forests in 1900 the various states owned over 11,000,000 acres, while the towns and communes owned 5,645,000 acres more. One town, Frank- fort-on-the-Oder, owns 15,570 acres of forest land; Brandenburg owns 11,220 acres; Stettin 10,570 acres; Frankfort-on-the-Main 8,590 acres; and Wies- baden 4,750 acres; while many small towns own estates running into the thousands of acres. Most of these forests are operated for profit on scientific principles. They are a direct source of revenue. In other instances the land is divided up for culti- 318 SOCIALIZED GERMANY vation, and in small villages is apportioned among the citizens. Substantial revenues are realized by the cities from their land holdings. In 1912 Dlisseldorf made a profit in excess of $100,000 from the turnover of its municipal land fund. Magdeburg bought land for $1,500,000 and sold two-thirds of it for $6,500,000. The land department of Cologne has made a profit of over $3,000,000 in thirty years' time from its land transactions. The city of Ulm recently bought 1,280 acres for $1,500,000, and subsequently sold one- half of it for $2,000,000, showing a cash profit of $500,000, and an addition of 860 acres to the landed possessions of the town. 1 The ownership of so large an area of land, fre- quently equal to one-half of the total area of the city, makes it possible for the community to carry out its building and planning projects in a far-seeing and at the same time economical way. It can direct population in certain directions; streets can be planned in a generous way. Spacious sites can be provided for public buildings, while adequate provision can be made for parks and open spaces. Through the ownership of advantageously located land the city can offer cheap and advantageous sites to factories, planned in such a way as to give the best of railroad and transportation facilities. In addition the ambitious housing plans which the 1 Dawson, supra, pp. 129-134. MUNICIPAL LAND OWNERSHIP 319 German cities have undertaken can be carried out with such restrictions as the city itself sees fit to impose. Moreover, as time goes on the land ac- quired becomes an asset of very great value to the community. It is claimed that the sewage farms acquired by the city of Berlin have increased so rapidly in value that their sale would enable the city to completely liquidate its total city debt. Un- doubtedly the same is true of many other cities. Through sales and leases substantial revenues are derived, which are used to keep down the burden of taxation, while the increasing revenues from forests and agricultural lands are a source of substantial profit. Emphasis is placed by all public author- ities upon the necessity of keeping down the exor- bitant prices of land speculators, which lead to bad housing, high rents, and overcrowding. The city becomes an active competitor against private land- owners and house builders, and in this way serves as a check upon private individuals whose specu- lative schemes form an obstacle to the development of the towns. Closely related to the land policies are the am- bitious housing projects which have been entered on by most of the larger German cities. No coun- try in the world has approached the housing prob- lem as earnestly and scientifically as has Germany. Officials recognize that private capital has proven inadequate to meet the needs of a rapidly increas- 320 SOCIALIZED GERMANY ing industrial population, and that only through the action of the state itself will proper and ade- quate housing facilities be afforded. Several official policies have been adopted for the solution of the problem. In the first place all new territory opened up for building is planned by the city far in advance of operations. The streets are designed for the spe- cific uses to which the new territory is to be put, while regulations determine the amount of land that can be covered by buildings, the distance they must be located back from the street, as well as their height above the ground. These regulations apply to private as well as public buildings. Cities have also co-operated in the erection of model dwellings, either by building houses upon municipal land or by the sale of land to building societies formed for this purpose. When land is sold directly to working men easy terms are provided, by which the land is paid for in annual installments, which include not only the interest charges but enough to pay for the whole cost of the house and lot in a certain specified time. 1 1 For a further survey of the housing projects of German cities, see Municipal Life and Government in Germany by W. H. Dawson, chapter VII, and European Cities at Work by the author, chapter IX. CHAPTER XXIV THE GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE GERMANY presents a new conception of the state. It has no counterpart in ancient or modern times. No other people think in the same terms, no other country has a similar psychology, no other nation has so completely subordinated the individual. The Roman Empire in the height of its power is the only state with which Germany can be compared. " Fatherland" signifies many things to the Ger- man; it has many other meanings than patriotic attachment. And all of the activities described in the previous chapters form part of German Kultur as the Germans use the term. Kultur is not lim- ited to educational and aesthetic things. Kultur in- cludes history and traditions, politics, statecraft, and administration; it includes state socialism, social legislation, the conservation of human life, and the promotion of the well-being of the people. All of the individual and collective contributions which Germany has made to the world form part of Kultur as the German understands the word. These con- tributions are colossal. And they are largely social. This emphasis on human welfare is one of the re- markable things about the German idea of the state. 321 322 SOCIALIZED GERMANY Almost all of the achievements enumerated have been brought about in the short space of a genera- tion. The greatest advance is coincident with the reign of William II. Bismarck laid the foundations of the structure, but his work was horizoned by the conditions of his generation and the unification of the empire. It remained for William II to give unity to the work by harmonizing the landed aristocracy and the commercial classes with humanism in legis- lation, and by calling to his aid the scientific thought of the nation and identifying with the state the con- tributions of the universities and technical schools, the scientists and artists, the educators and the business men. Unity is the predominant note in Germany. The nation thinks and acts as a great human mechanism, adjusted in all of its parts to efficiency and the ad- vancement of the Fatherland. An ambition for im- perial power seems to be the conscious motive of the people. No group has been permitted to sacrifice the state in its exclusive control. Each class has accepted sacrifices and limitations on its privileges when the national welfare was at stake. Legislation has been balanced. Rights have car- ried corresponding duties, and privileges a corre- sponding burden. To the old patriotism of war has been added a new patriotism of peace, which has created a public sentiment ready to assume burdens and sacrifices for the common weal. While GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 323 legislating for production Germany has legislated for distribution as well. While promoting industry she has promoted the well-being of the people. While training her men to arms she has trained them as artisans, and while granting privileges to the em- ploying class she has required them to share in the burdens of the state, to relinquish profitable fields of investment, and to consider the welfare of the working class. State socialism in Germany is of two kinds: first, productive socialism, and second, distributive social- ism. One means an increase in the amount of wealth produced and the other its juster distribution. Of the two the latter is more important. If we increase the amount of wealth produced, there is more to go around, but this does not necessarily improve the well-being of those who produce, and as a matter of fact, while the general standard of living in most industrial countries has undoubtedly advanced dur- ing the past generation, the gain to the great major- ity of the people is far behind the advance that has been made in production and accumulation. And up to the present time the efforts of lawmakers has been almost exclusively devoted to the promotion of production, to the stimulation of invention, to the encouragement of industry and commerce. The departments of the government, the appropriations made, the kinds of activities carried on have behind them the desire to promote the well-being of the 324 SOCIALIZED GERMANY capitalist and privileged class. Outside of Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland, there has been but little legislation or little official thought to the more generous distribution of the gains of civilization. In America and England social legislation that looks to fundamental reform is not a matter of pri- mary concern to statesmen. It is but little studied in the universities. It has awakened no philan- thropies or endowments for research. There is but little legislation that has for its object economic justice or even fundamental change. We have given protection to domestic industry from foreign com- petition, we have subsidized the railroads by land grants, we have encouraged agriculture, but in so far as social legislation is concerned our official mind is still in the individualistic stage. Legislation for the promotion of production has proceeded apace, while legislation for the individual man, for the worker, and the great mass of the people has remained in the Adam Smith, Ricardian age. Only within the last few years has there been any sign of change. Germany differs from other leading countries in the thought that has been given to the distribution as well as the production of wealth. And no other country has so greatly improved the well-being of so large a portion of the people. This is the real ex- planation of her power; this lies back of her military achievements; this explains her advance in trade, the growth in her overseas commerce, and the rise GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 325 of her merchant marine from that of a negligible position to that of the second maritime power of the world. It is almost impossible to enumerate, much less to translate into our laissez-faire consciousness, all of the laws and administrative decrees that have been enacted by the empire, states, and cities during the past generation. Only the main measures stand out in relief. But at every turn in conversation with business men and workers some new measure is dis- covered that is part of the structure that has made Germany what she is. Let us first consider the agencies of productive socialism, which are designed primarily for increasing the wealth of the empire. Transportation, which is the circulatory system of the nation, is organized with the most painstaking thought to realize the maxi- mum of service at a low cost. Seaport and river harbors, navigable rivers, streams, and canals have been linked up with the railways and city terminals so as to reduce waste to the minimum. Transporta- tion is an agency of industry and commerce. Profit is only incidental. It has been made easy for men to enter business. Competition has been freed from as many risks as possible. The capitalist is offered good building sites by the cities, closely connected with the means of transportation, and on easy terms. While syndicates have come into existence and are encouraged by the state, they are not permitted to 326 SOCIALIZED GERMANY strangle competition; and new capital is assured an opportunity and is encouraged to enter any field. Germany has recognized that the division of la- bor is no longer confined within a single industry. Transportation between the different sections of the empire is almost as important as transportation within the individual establishment. And Germany has adjusted her transportation system, her mer- chant marine, and her credit agencies as though the state and the outside world were a single industrial organism. Rapidly increasing population has to be kept at work. Little outlet was offered by the colonies, which have not been a success. And domestic con- sumption has not kept pace with the growth of the output. A foreign market had to be found. This has been achieved by a systematic study of foreign desires and prejudices, by the adjustment of wares to foreign wishes, by the careful training of clerks and business agents, as well as by the building of steam- ship lines which run to every available market. The merchant marine as well as the foreign commerce of the country has grown rapidly. Industrial and commercial processes are a scien- tific study. Education has been adjusted to changing needs. There are technical universities and techni- cal high schools. In every large city are institutions devoted to training workers in industry, applied art, and manual dexterity. Business is a profession for GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 327 which men are specially trained in commercial col- leges of high rank. Men not only familiarize them- selves with foreign languages; they spend a number of years of early life in England, America, and in colonies, acquainting themselves with manufactur- ing details and the wants of the most distant markets. The European war has promoted the process of socialization far beyond what it was a year ago. When the war is over there will undoubtedly be a great increase in state activity; a wide expansion of the services rendered and an accelerated movement toward the socialized state under undemocratic forms. There will be an expansion of public credit at low rates of interest for the rebuilding of the in- dustry and trade of the nation. New industries will be taken over as a means of lightening the burdens of taxation. There will be new partnerships be- tween the state and the syndicates, so arranged as to secure the co-operation of private initiative and at the same time realize a share of syndicate profits. Germany will undoubtedly emerge from the wreck- age of the war with greater rapidity than the other nations of Europe by reason of her ownership of so many agencies that lie at the life of the nation and particularly by virtue of her long training in co- operative socialized effort. Distributive socialism is closely related to pro- ductive socialism. By distributive socialism I mean 328 SOCIALIZED GERMANY services performed by the state at low cost or no direct cost at all. In other countries many of these services are either not performed at all or are left to commerce to be exploited. These include the many non-profitable undertakings of the states and cities, the provision for education and health, and the many social services which are supported by taxation. First in the list of such activities are the social insurance schemes which distribute to the com- munity the burdens of sickness, old age, accident, and invalidity. These in themselves have freed millions of men and women from fear of the future, from loss of self-respect, and have kept them as pro- ducing members of the community. Distributive socialism has provided labor ex- changes which eliminate much of the waste of unem- ployment. It has erected working men's hotels or Herbergen in every community, to which the wan- dering artisan can go. Distress or emergency work provided by the cities relieves the worker during periods of industrial disturbance, just as does the pro- tection of the health of the community by sanitation, by the community doctor, the nurse, the pure-milk stations, and the convalescent homes. Distributive socialism receives the savings of the poor in the municipal savings-bank, and loans the deposits back again at a low rate of interest for the building of working men's homes, the purchase of land, and the maintenance of pawn-shops for the needy. It pro- GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 329 vides municipal houses or apartments, or develops garden suburbs. But distributive socialism does not end with the physical well-being of the working classes, it makes provision for the leisure life of the people as well. Cities maintain opera-houses and theatres in which the best of productions can be heard at a low cost. Through these the cultural standard of the people is elevated. There are municipal art galleries and museums. Cities maintain colleges and academies, they provide lectures and entertainments. Every city of any size has its orchestra or military band which give excellent concerts in the parks and town halls. The leisure life of Germany is under state control just as is education. This is an important function of distributive socialism. It is by these means that the standard of living of all classes has been improved. Wages have risen, it is true, but the war on poverty, on distress and dis- ease has been waged by the generous use of taxation and the distribution to the poor of a multitude of services which in many other countries are the ex- clusive enjoyment of the few. And the cost of these services, which in most coun- tries is shifted onto the poor through indirect cus- toms and excise taxes, is largely borne by those best able to bear it. Taxes bear not only on property but on incomes as well. The rates are progressive, so that the rich and well-to-do pay more than their 330 SOCIALIZED GERMANY proportional share. In some cities the income tax on the very rich for state and municipal purposes rises as high as 10 or 15 per cent. Cities impose an unearned increment tax on the rising value of land, and frankly insist that land values are social in character, and are the result not of the industry of the owner, but of the growth of population and industry. In addition, a large part of the revenues of the empire, the individual states, and cities comes from the many productive undertakings owned by them. Not only have the propertied classes been dispossessed of the most profitable monopolistic undertakings, but tax burdens have been imposed that in America would be considered the most un- just of class legislation. Property, business, and industry are regulated in the public interest. Factories are required to build where the community decrees. The individual may not lay out his land as suits his fancy or his profit, he must lay it out and sell it for such purposes as the city decides for him. When he erects his home he must abide by the ordinances of the city as to the kind of house he will build, the amount of land it will cover, as well as the height and character of the building. This is but part of the comprehen- sive system of town-planning that views the city as a unit rather than an accidental group of individual properties. Even banking and credit are largely in public hands. Over 90 per cent, of the individual GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 331 deposits are in public institutions while the govern- ment owns a controlling interest in the Imperial Bank, and through its ownership supervises and directs the credit transactions of the country. All this is only a skeleton of the industrial, com- mercial, and protective agencies that constitute pro- ductive and distributive socialism. It does not in- clude the markets and slaughter-houses, the parcel post, the mines and estates, the forests, and the multitude of activities that are owned by the cities. But it suggests the German idea of the state, an idea willingly accepted by all classes. This is state socialism, approved by statesmen, business men, the university, and public opinion generally. It explains the efficiency of the country, not only in peace but in war as well. It also explains the psychology of Ger- many, and especially of Prussia, where state regi- mentation has been carried to its greatest develop- ment. And within these social regulations a nation of 67,000,000 people moves with a remarkable degree of individual freedom. Instead of stagnation there are initiation and aggression, not only in industry and commerce but in social intercourse as well. For the state draws to its service the most competent men of the country. There is a desire for service, for un- remunerated work in the city council, on commit- tees, in connection with chambers of commerce, and semipublic bodies, that affects all classes. And by means of a civil service that weeds out all but the fit. 332 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the most capable men of the universities and of the professions make their way into the service and give their best to the state. It should not be inferred that there are no faults in the system described. Paternalism and autoc- racy involve costs of a most serious character. They are political, social, and personal. They are costs to the individual. And as, according to our conception of society, the state exists for the indi- vidual rather than the individual for the state, they are costs to the state as well. And the most serious price which the Germans pay for an autocratic state is caste, a caste that runs through the very fibre of the state. Caste is found everywhere. And it is not challenged by the majority of the people. It is assumed that the individual is born to his place in society and that only in exceptional cases may he hope to rise from it. That is, of course, most true of politics which is in the hands of the old privileged classes who consider that they have an almost divine right to rule. It extends even to the cities, where some concessions have been made to representative institutions. Caste prevails in all social intercourse. Official rank carries an authority and distinction not to be found in any other civilized country. This, too, is part of the bureaucratic idea of the state. It strengthens the ruling caste to identify with itself a large number of people. Caste rules in education. This is possibly the GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 333 most serious criticism that can be made against the educational system of Germany. It affects the uni- versities in which conformity is the open door to advancement. This destroys criticism, it censors the intellectuals, it identifies the entire scientific world with the state, and the state as interpreted by the ruling caste. This is a fault, unhappily, of higher educational institutions in other countries, but no- where is the intellectual and scientific world so frankly and officially identified with the state as in Germany. The same is true of the church which is a state institution. Elementary, secondary, and technical education partakes of the same caste system, the same state control. The individual child is educated for the station in life to which he is born. Schools are classi- fied accordingly. The choice once made is in the majority of instances irrevocable. Moreover, all education, elementary, secondary, and higher, is pyramided to a central control. There is state and for the most part imperial uniformity. Localities are not permitted to experiment as they do in America; the local school board is not autonomous as it is with us. The child is moulded by the state, to the state's idea of what is best for the state, and only incidentally what is best for the child. There is uniformity rather than variety, and in consequence that initiative so characteristic of America is almost wholly lacking in the average child. Prussia has ironed out personal individuality by 334 SOCIALIZED GERMANY the educational system described. She has also ironed out much of the individuality of the states, an individuality that made the Germany of fifty years ago what she was to the world. And this is a terrible loss, as is any system that fails to awaken and keep alive the spontaneity and resourcefulness of the people. But these sacrifices are not a necessary part of state socialism. The institutions which Germany has developed, and the efficiency that has been achieved are in no way inconsistent with democracy. They are rather the consciously desired ends of the ruling class, which seeks submission rather than pro- test, and subordination to the state rather than ser- vice of the state to the people. There is nothing democratic in the German idea of the state. The measures enumerated have not been carried through by the Social Democratic party, although it has undoubtedly been indirectly responsi- ble for much of the public opinion that sanctioned them. There was nothing like a referendum to as- certain public opinion. Nowhere in German state- craft is there any belief in democracy or representa- tive institutions or in manhood suffrage. Even in the more Democratic states of the south the suf- frage is limited by property qualifications. State socialism is a natural outgrowth of feudalism. It has its roots far back in German traditions and the experiences of the people. It is the eighteenth- GERMAN CONCEPTION OF THE STATE 335 century state adjusted to twentieth-century condi- tions. And it has largely made Germany what she is, a menace and a model, a problem to statesmen of other countries, and a pathfinder in social reform. INDEX Accident insurance, benefits, 195, 196 Administration, German cities, 267 Administrative agencies, Ger- man cities, 269 Administrative control, German cities, 272 Agriculture, 57; scientific meth- ods in, 58 Architectural restrictions, 306 Artisans', German, hours of work, 202 Ashley, W. J., 199 B Ballot, open, 41 Barmen, vocational education in, 238 Baths, public, 255 Beet-sugar industry, 60 Benefits, accident insurance, 196 Berlin, water traffic of, 125; Stettin Canal, 126; system of street sewerage, 254 Birth-rate, Germany, 55 Bismarck, 15; constructive legis- lation, 54; socialized legisla- tion, 162; old-age pensions, 166; attitude toward social insurance, 193 Bremen, free port of, 127 Burgomasters, position of, 271; qualifications of, 273; salaries of, 276 Business classes in Germany, at- titude toward state socialism, 168 By-products developed by Ger- many, 63 Canals, 123-125 Caste, 44, 332 Cemeteries, 253 Chancellor, 29; powers of, 30 Cities, electoral system in, 47; population in, 52, 56, 266; socialism in, 85; regulation by state, 86; administration of, 267; administrative agencies, 269; administrative control of, 272; power of king over, 272; sale of food by, 288; indebted- ness of German and American, 293, 295 Civil service, 21, 88; employees in, 92 Class rule in Germany, 37 Coal and coke, 68 Coal mines, nationalization of, 152 Colonial expansion, 72 Commerce, German, overseas, 69; influence of education on, 246 Compensation insurance, 197 Conception of state, German, 82, 296, 321 Constitution, Germany, 13, 26 Consumption, standard articles, 74 337 338 INDEX Continuation schools, 231. See also Vocational education Cremation, employment of, 253 D Death-rate, tuberculosis, 261 Democracy, fear of, in Germany, 282; little of, in Germany, 334 Dental clinics, school-children, 227 Discipline, German education, 217 Distress work, 179 Distribution of wealth, German thought on, 324 Distributive socialism, 324 District or zone system, 304 Division of labor, 326 Duality, German, 12 Dusseldorf, 135, 275, 311; har- bor administration of, 136; industrial section, 135 E East Prussia, 38 Education, Germany, 17; higher, 18, 208-210; among workers, 205; influence of, on German industry, 212; prized by all classes, 213; faults of, 213; elementary, 220; compared with United States, 220; prac- tical nature of elementary, 221; administration of, 224; state control of, 225; influence of German, 230; vocational, 223, 231-240; influence of, on German commerce, 246. See also Special schools, Technical schools, Universities Electoral system, 30, 40, 42; Prussian, 41; in cities, 47; three-class system, 47, 269 Emergency work, 179 Employees, civil services, 92 Employment, attitude toward, 172; exchanges, 172 England, laissez-faire in, 80; wealth in, 53 European war, effect on social- ism, 327 Expansion, colonial, 72 Experiment stations, farms, 148 Explanation of Germany, 9 Exports, Germany, 65; machin- ery, 68 Factories, control of, 310 Farms, experiment stations, 148 Feeding school-children, 228 Feudal state, 31 Feudal system, 146 Feudalism in Germany, 10 Food, inspection of, 253; sale of, by cities, 288 Foreign trade, 68 Forests, German, 149, 317; own- ership of, 148; earnings of, 150 France, war with, 25 Frankfort-on-Main, 310 Free ports, 127; Bremen, Ham- burg, Liibeck, 127 French Revolution, 12 German conception of state, 321 German constitution, 13, 26 Germany, explanation of, 9; con- solidation of, 24 Grammar, working-men's, 206 H Hamburg, free port of, 127; vo- cational education in, 232 Harbors, 134-136; Dusseldorf, 136; Mannheim, 141 Health, of school-children, 227; in Prussia, 250 Help schools, 223 INDEX 339 Herbergen, 177 High schools, 218 Higher education, German, 18, 208-210 Home rule, 267 Hospitals, Germany, 252 Hours of work, German artisans', 202 House owners, influence of, hi town council, 269 Illiteracy, Germany, 215 Income taxes, increasing wealth of people, 75 Indebtedness, German cities, 293; American cities, 295 Industrial courts, 188 Industrial progress, Germany, 66 Industrial revolution, Germany, 14 Industrial schools, 212 Industrial sections, 50, 135, 309 Industry, science in, 64; influ- ence of education on, in Ger- many, 212 Infant mortality, warfare on, 179 Inspection of food, 253 Insurance, state, 91; social, 192-200; compensation, 197; amount of payments, 199; invalid, 262 Insurance funds, administration of, 195 Insurance laws, social, 170 Invalid insurance, relation to tuberculosis, 262 Junker, 33, 44; power of, 32, 36 Junkerism, 39 K Kaiser Wilhelm II, 15; personal- ity of, 22; ascendancy of, 28 Kerschensteiner, Doctor Georg, 216 King, powers of, 26; power of, over cities, 272 Krupp works, 66 Kultur, Germany, 321; German idea of, 4 Labor courts, 182 Laissez-faire, hi England, hi America, 80; German attitude toward, 165 Land monopoly, 37 Landownership, 313; effect of, 43 Land speculation, 314 Lawyers, discouraged in labor courts, 185 Legislation for working classes, 164 Live-stock industry, 61 Lodging-houses, municipal, 176 Liibeck, 127 M Machinery, exports, 68 Magdeburg, vocational educa- tion in, 238 Magistrat, 276 Mannheim, 137; harbor of, 141 Manufactures, 33 Markets, 288 Merchant marine, 70 Milk supply, 288 Mineral resources, 61 ; state con- trol of, 151 Mining properties, Prussia, 147 Mississippi River, 144 Monarchical socialism, theory of, 83 Monopoly, German attitude to- ward, 158 Munich, vocational schools in, 223, 232, 240 340 INDEX Municipal ownership, Germany, extent of, 283; profits of, 292 Municipal socialism, 280 Music, in public recreation, 180 N Nationalization, sentiment for, 152 Obedience, 19 Oil monopoly, 160 Old-age insurance, 197, 198; Bis- marck's attitude toward, 166 Overseas commerce, 69 Partnership,, state and private industry, 156 Payments, amount of insurance, 199 Physical culture, 228 Pig-iron production, 62 Playgrounds, 256 Political activities, socialized, 204 Political parties, 33; in Reich- stag, 33 Population, urban, 52, 56, 266; increase of, 54 Ports, free, 127 Post-office department, 90 Potash industry, 153 Potash syndicate, 153 Profits of state socialism, 92 Prohibition, movement for, among workers, 207 Property, control of, 330 Protective tariff, 60 Prussia, health in, 250 Psychology, German, 20; influ- ence of state socialism on, 21 Public ownership, 146; effect of, on people, 22 Public recreation, 180 Public-service corporations, own- ership of, 284; profits, 284 R Railways, state-owned, 95; early experience with, 95; privately operated, 96; purchase of, by state, 97; present mileage, 97; efficiency of, 97; Prussian, 98; financial success of, 98; serv- ice, 103; industrial, 104; Eng- lish opinions of, 104; stations, Germany, 105; rebates, 106, 108; discriminations, 106; ex- port trade fostered, 107; spe- cial services, 110; improve- ments, 110; civil service in, 111; electrification of, 112; passenger fares, 112; freight rates, 113; burden, 113; ad- ministration, 115; politics di- vorced from, 119 Recreation, public, 180; subsi- dies for, 180 Reichstag, 28; membership, par- ties in, 33, 35; power of mem- bers, 36 Rhine, harbors of, 134; traffic on, 139 Ruling classes, 11 S Sanatoria, tuberculosis, 259 Sanitation, 248; control of, 249 Savings-bank deposits, 74 Schmoller, Provisor, 159 Schools. See Education Science, in industry, 64; in agri- culture, 58 Scientific methods, agriculture, 58 Sickness insurance, 194 Slaughter-houses, Germany, 287 Social insurance, 192 ; Bismarck's attitude toward, 193; sickness INDEX 341 insurance, 194; administra- tion of funds, 195; accident insurance, 195; attitude of employers, 196; benefits, 198; compensation paid, 197; old- age insurance, 197; number of persons insured, 198; pay- ments, amount of, 199; effect of insurance on worker, 200 Social legislation, 85; Bismarck and, 162; in America, 324 Socialism, monarchical, theory of, 83; in cities, 85; distribu- tive, 324; effect of European war on, 327 Socialist party, vote of, 203 Soil, Germany, 59 South Germany, 48 Special schools, 210 Standard of living, 76 State, German conception of, 82, 164, 296, 321; partnership with private industry, 156; at- titude toward working classes, 201 State control, mineral resources, 151; over cities, 86; in educa- tion, 225 State insurance, 91 State socialism, influence of, on psychology, 21; extent of, 89; Prussian tradition of, 163; at- titude of business classes to- ward, 168, 323 Steam-power in Prussia, 63 Stein and Hardenberg, 38 Stettin Canal, 126 Street scavenging, 255 Streets, arrangement of, 303. See Town planning Subsidies, recreation, 180 System of treating sewerage, Berlin, 254 Tariff, 60 Taxation, 75, 329 Teachers, preparation of, 217; training of, 226 Technical high schools, 210 Three-class electoral system, 47, 269 Town council, 269; influence of house owners in, 269 Town planning, 298; beginning of, 300; streets, arrangement of, 303; districts, or zone system, 304; widening, city planned for, 305; architec- tural restrictions, 306; street disfigurements, 307; indus- trial districts, 309 Trade, foreign, 68 Tradition, German, 87; of state socialism in Prussia, 163 Treaties, 73 Tuberculosis, war upon, 285 ; san- atoria, 259; death-rate, 261; relation of invalidity insurance to, 262 U Urban population, 52, 56, 266 United States of America, ele- mentary education in, 220 Universities, German, 18, 208; attendance at, 208; effect on students, 219 Vocational education, 231; hi Munich, 223, 232, 240; Ham- burg, 232; Magdeburg, 238; Barmen, 238; Frankfort-on- Main, 240 Voting, three-class system, 47 W Wages, increase of, 77 Waste, German attitude toward, 161 342 INDEX Water-power, Germany, 64 Waterways, development of, 121; tonnage of, 122; waterway programme, Germany, 122; canals, 123; construction of, 124; traffic on, 125; free ports, 127 Wealth, Germany, 53; of Eng- land, 53; increase of, in Ger- many, 73 Wilhelm II, 15; personality of, 22; ascendancy of, 28 Workers, attitude of . state to- ward, 162; effect of insurance laws on, 200 Working classes, legislation for, 164; attitude of state toward, 201; education among, 205; grammar, 206; movement for prohibition among, 207 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED LOAN DEPT. This book is due on the last date stamped below, or on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. Mil 9. - f 9sc y H2ra*aO SEP 2 7 1992 170 DISC CIRC AUGU-S 2 1 LD 21A-60m-10,'65 (F7763slO)476B General Library University of California Berkeley YG 89907 U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES CD070S20bl "il'H HN HM5" HI THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY