Ex Libris 
 C. K. OGDEN

 
 NOTICE TO SUBSCRIBERS. 
 
 TV /T ESSRS. CLARK have pleasure in publishing,, as the 
 ** first issue of the FOREIGN THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY for 
 1873- 
 
 WINER'S COLLECTION OF THE CONFESSIONS 
 OF CHRISTENDOM; AND 
 
 KEIL ON EZRA, NEHEMIAH, AND ESTHER. 
 
 The second issue for 1873 w ^ De KEIL'S COMMENTARY ON 
 JEREMIAH, Vol. I., and probably BISHOP MARTENSEN'S CHRISTIAN 
 ETHICS. 
 
 They thank their Subscribers for the long-continued support 
 with which they have been favoured. 
 
 An early remittance of the Subscription for 1873 ( 2i s.) will 
 oblige. 
 
 MESSRS. CLARK are enabled to offer to Subscribers to 
 FOREIGN THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY the well-known Work of Dr. 
 ALEXANDER of Princeton 
 
 COMMENTARY ON THE PROPHECIES OF ISAIAH, Edited by 
 Professor EADIE, in two vols. 8vo, at the Subscription 
 price of IDS. 6d. 
 
 They beg to draw attention to the prospectus of their pro- 
 posed translation of 
 
 Dr. MEYER'S COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 38 GEORGE STREET, 
 EDINBURGH, May 1873. 

 
 CLARK'S 
 
 FOKEIGN 
 
 THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY. 
 
 FOURTH SERIES. 
 VOL. XXXY. 
 
 on ti)t SJoftrtnes! aniJ Confessions of 
 
 EDINBUEGH: 
 T. & T. CLAEK, 38, GEOEGE STEEET. 
 
 MDCCCLXXIII.
 
 PRINTED BY MURRAY AND G1BB, 
 
 FOR 
 
 T. & T. CLARK, EDINBURGH. 
 
 LONDON, .... HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. 
 
 DUBLIN JOHN ROBERTSON AND CO. 
 
 NEW YORK, . . . SCRIBNER, WELFORD, AND CO.
 
 A COMPARATIVE VIEW 
 
 OF 
 
 THE DOCTRINES AND CONFESSIONS OF THE 
 VARIOUS COMMUNITIES OF CHRISTENDOM, 
 
 WITH ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THEIR ORIGINAL STANDARDS. 
 
 BY 
 
 DR. GEORGE BENEDICT WINER, 
 
 FORMERLY PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LE1PSIG. 
 
 EDITED FROM THE LAST EDITION, WITH AN INTRODUCTION, BY 
 
 REV. WILLIAM B. POPE, 
 
 PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY, DIDSBURY COLLEGE, MANCHESTER. 
 
 EDINBURGH: 
 T.. AND T. CLARK, 38, GEORGE STREET. 
 
 MDCCCLXXIII.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 PACK 
 
 INTRODUCTION BY THE EDITOR, . . . . . ' . xi 
 
 INTRODUCTION, ...... 1 
 
 1. ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE SEVERAL COMMUNIONS, AS EXHI- 
 BITED IN THEIR STANDARDS, . . . ". i 
 II. THE SYMBOLICAL DOCUMENTS, . . . . .8 
 
 1. Romish Church, 8 ; 2. Greek Church, 12 ; 3. Evangelical 
 (Lutheran) Church, 15 ; 4. Reformed Church, 20 ; Arminians, 
 28 ; 5. Baptists (Anabaptists, Mennonites), 29 ; 6. Socin- 
 ians, 31 ; 7. Quakers, 34. 
 
 I. THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, AND FOUNDATION OF CHRIS- 
 TIAN DOCTRINE, . . . . . . .37 
 
 I. First Point of Divergence : Symbolical Testimonies : 1. Greek, 
 37 ; 2. Roman, 38 ; 3. Protestant, 41 ; 4. Socinian, 45 ; 5. 
 Quaker, 46. 
 II. Second Point of Divergence, 49. 1. Roman, 50 ; 2. Greek, 51 ; 
 
 3. Protestant, 53 ; 4. Socinian, 55 ; 5. Quaker, 55. 
 III. Divergences of less import in relation to Scripture, . .57 
 
 II. THE TRINITY, ........ 6:3 
 
 Symbolical Testimonies : 1. Romish and Protestant, 63 ; 2. Socinian, 
 64 ; 3. Arminian, 66. Differences of less moment, 67. 
 
 III. CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN ; INVOCATION OF SAINTS ; VENERATION OF 
 
 PICTURES AND RELICS, . . . . . .68 
 
 I. Invocation of Saints. 1. Roman, 69 ; 2. Greek, 70 ; 3. Protes- 
 tant, 73. 
 
 II. Veneration of Pictures and Relics. 1. Roman, 75; 2. Greek, 76; 
 3. Protestant, 77. 
 
 IV.. ORIGINAL STATE OF MAN ; THE IMAGE OF GOD, . . .73 
 
 1. Roman, 79 ; 2. Greek, 80 ; 3. Lutheran, 81 ; 4. Reformed, 81 ; 
 5. Mennonites, 82 ; 6. Arminian, 83 ; 7. Socinian, 84 ; 8. 
 Quaker, 85. 
 
 V. RESULTS OF THE FALL ; PRESENT STATE OF MAN, . . .86 
 
 I. First Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 87 ; 2. Greek, 89 ; 3. Luthe- 
 ran, 89 ; 4. Reformed, 92 ; 5. Arminian, 94 ; 6. Socinian, 95 ; 
 7. Quaker, 96 ; 8. Mennonites, 97. 
 
 **y * Q 
 
 * ^.tiJ
 
 viii CONTENTS. 
 
 FACE 
 
 II. Second Point of Divergence, 98. 1. Socinian, 100 ; 2. Arminian, 
 
 100 ; 8. Roman, 102 ; 4. Greek, 104 ; 5. Lutheran, 104 ; 6. 
 
 Reformed, 105. 
 Original Sin and Baptism : 1. Roman, 108 ; 2. Greek, 108 ; 3. 
 
 Protestant, 109 ; 4. Arminian, 109 ; 5. Quaker and Mennonite, 
 
 110. 
 III. Third Point of Divergence, 110. 1. Roman, Greek, etc., Ill ; 2. 
 
 Lutheran, 112 ; 3. Reformed, 113 ; 4. Quaker, 114. 
 
 VI. PERSON OF CHRIST, AND His DIVINITY, . .116 
 
 Socinian Symbols : the Human Nature of Christ, . . .116 
 
 Relation of the two Natures : 1. Lutheran, 118 ; 2. Reformed, 121 ; 
 3. Quaker, 124 ; 4. Anabaptist, 125. 
 
 VII. REDEMPTION : THE MERITS OF CHRIST, . . .127 
 
 First Point of Divergence, 127. Symbolical Testimonies : 1. 
 Roman, 128 ; 2. Greek, 129 ; 3. Protestant, 129. Sinlessness 
 and Obedience of Christ, 130. Symbols, 131 : 1. Protestant, 
 132; 2. Socinian, 132 ; 3. Quaker, 136. 
 
 Second Point of Divergence, 138. Symbolical Testimonies : 1. 
 Roman Catholic Decrees, 139 ; 2. Protestant Antitheses from the 
 Symbols, 140; 3. Arminian Doctrine, 142. Indulgences, 143. 
 
 VIII. CONVERSION AND GRACE, ...... 145 
 
 I. .That the Divine Grace is indispensable to Conversion : 1. Ro- 
 man, 146; 2. Greek, 146; 3. Lutheran and Reformed, 146; 
 4. Arminian, etc., 147. 
 
 II. Relation of Divine Grace to Human Ability : 1. Protestant 
 Symbols, 148; 2. Roman, 152; 3. Greek, 153; 4. Socinian, 
 154 ; 5. Arminian, 155 ; 6. Mennonites, 157 ; 7. Quaker, 158. 
 
 IX. UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE : PREDESTINATION, . . .161 
 
 I. Reformed Symbols, . . . . . .162 
 
 II. Anti-Predestinarian Symbols : 1. Arminian, 169 ; 2. Lutheran, 
 172 ; 3. Socinian and Mennonite, 173 ; 4. Roman and Greek, 
 174 ; 5. Quaker, 175. 
 
 X. JUSTIFICATION : FAITH, WORKS, . . . . .178 
 
 First Point of Divergence, 178. Symbolical Testimonies : 1. 
 
 Roman, Mennonite, and Quaker, 179 ; 2. Protestant, 180. 
 Second Point of Divergence, 183. 1. Roman, 183, 189 ; 2. Pro- 
 testant, 185, 191 ; 3. Socinian, 191 ; 4. Arminian and Mennon- 
 ite, 192 ; 5. Greek, 195 ; 6. Quaker, 195. 
 
 Third Point of Divergence, 196. 1. Roman, 196; 2. Greek, 
 198 ; 3. Protestant, 199 ; 4. Reformed, 200 ; 5. Arminian, 201 ; 
 6. Socinian, 202 ; 7. Quaker, 202.
 
 CONTENTS. ix 
 
 PAGE 
 
 XL THE HOLINESS OF THE REGENERATE, AND "WORKS OF SUPEREROGA- 
 TION, . ' . . . > -V . 205 
 Point of Divergence, 205. Symbolical Testimonies : a. As to 
 whether the Justified may perfectly fulfil the Law of God 1. 
 Roman and Quaker, 205 ; 2. Protestant, 206. b. Whether the 
 Justified can do more than keep the Commandments 1. Roman 
 and Greek, 207 ; 2. Protestant, 209. c. Monasticism and Vows, 
 210 ; Protestant Symbols, 211. 
 
 XII. Loss OF GRACE : MORTAL AND VENIAL SINS, . . . 214 
 
 Point of Divergence, 214. Symbolical Testimonies : a. The De- 
 fectibility of Justification 1. Roman, Lutheran, and Arminian, 
 214 ; 2. Reformed, 215 ; 3. Quaker, 217. 6. Relation of Mortal 
 Sins to Faith 1. Roman Catholic, 218 ; 2. Protestant, 218. 
 c. Venial Sins, and their proper Nature 1. Roman and Greek, 
 219 ; 2. Protestant, 220 ; 3. Arminian, 220. 
 
 XIII. THE MEANS OF GRACE : THE WORD OF GOD, . . . 222 
 
 1. Roman, 222 ; 2. Protestant, 223 ; 3. Socinian, 225 ; 4. Armi- 
 nian, 226. 
 Law and Gospel : 1. Protestant, 227 ; 2. Socinian, 231. 
 
 XIV. SACRAMENTS GENERALLY, ...... 232 
 
 First Point of Divergence : 1. Quaker, 232 ; 2. Roman, Greek, 
 
 and Lutheran, 234 ; 3. Reformed, 234 ; 4. Socinian, 237 ; 5. 
 
 Arminian, 238. 
 Second Point of Divergence, 239. 1. Roman and Greek, 240 ; 2. 
 
 Protestant, 241 ; 3. Arminian, 242. 
 Third Point of Divergence, 243. 1. Roman, 244 ; 2. Protestant, 
 
 246. 
 
 XV. BAPTISM, . . . . . . . .249 
 
 First Point of Divergence : Socinian Symbols, 249. 
 
 Second Point of Divergence : 1. Socinian Symbols, 251 ; 2. Armi- 
 nian and Mennonite, 252 ; 3. Roman, Greek, and Protestant, 
 253. 
 
 Third Point of Divergence, 255. 1. Roman, 256, 258 ; 2. Pro- 
 testant, 256, 259 ; 3. Socinian, 260 ;.4. Arminian, 261 ; 5. Ana- 
 baptist, 261 ; 6. Quaker, 262. 
 
 XVI. THE LORD'S SUPPER, .... .264 
 
 First Point of Divergence : 1. Socinian, 264 ; 2. Anninian, 265 ; 
 
 3. Greek and Roman, 266 ; 4. Protestant, 267. 
 Second Point of Divergence : 1. The Eucharistic Doctrine of 
 
 Zwingli and Calvin, 269 ; 2. Symbolical Testimonies, 271. 
 Third Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 280, 285 ; 2. Greek, 
 
 281 ; 3. Lutheran and Reformed, 283, 286. 
 Fourth Point of Divergence, 287. 1. Roman, 288, 291 ; 2. Greek 
 
 and Protestant, 289, 290.
 
 CONTEXTS. 
 
 Fifth Point of Divergence, 292. 1. Roman and Greek, 293 ; 2. 
 Protestant, 296. 
 
 XVII. PENANCE, . . 297 
 
 Divergence, 297. a. Repentance, and the Sacrament of Penance 
 generally, and Satisfactions in particular 1. Roman and Greek, 
 298 ; 2. Protestant, 301. b. Confession and Absolution 1. 
 Roman and Greek, 303 ; 2. Protestant, 304. 
 
 Penances, 307. 1. Roman and Greek, 308 ; 2. Protestant, 309. 
 
 Purgatory, 310. 1. Roman, 311 ; 2. Greek, 312 ; 3. Protestant, 
 813. 
 
 Indulgence : Romish Symbols, 314. 
 
 Prayers for the Dead, 316. Evangelical Protests, 317. 
 
 XVIII. CONFIRMATION; MARRIAGE; SUPREME UNCTION ; ORDERS, . 318 
 
 a. Confirmation 1. Greek and Latin, 318 ; 2. Protestant, 320. 
 b. Marriage, Divorce 1. Roman, 321, 323 ; 2. Greek, 322 ; 3. 
 Protestant, 324. c. Extreme Unction Roman and Greek, 325. 
 d. Orders 1. Roman and Greek, 327 ; 2. Protestant, 329. 
 
 XIX. THE CHURCH: ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY, . . . 330 
 
 First Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 331 ; 2. Greek, 332 ; 3. 
 Protestant, 332 ; 4. Arminian, 335 ; 5. Quaker, 335 ; 6. Soci- 
 nian, 336. 
 Second Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 336, 338 ; 2. Protestant, 
 
 337, 338. 
 
 Third Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 339 ; 2. Greek and Pro- 
 testant, 340. 
 
 XX. THE MINISTRY, . . . . . . .344 
 
 First Point of Divergence : 1. Quaker, 344 ; 2. Roman and Pro- 
 testant, 346. 
 
 Second Point of Divergence, 347. 1. Roman and Greek, 348 ; 2. 
 Protestant, 349. 
 
 Third Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 351 ; 2. Protestant, 352 ; 
 3. Socinian, 353. 
 
 Fourth Point of Divergence, 353. 
 
 Fifth Point of Divergence : 1. Roman, 354 ; 2. Protestant, 355 ; 
 3. Greek, 356. 
 
 Sixth Point of Divergence : 1. Roman and Greek, 357 ; 2. Pro- 
 testant, 359. 
 
 The Power of the Keys : 1. Protestant, 361 ; 2. Roman, 362. 
 
 XXI. DIVINE WORSHIP : LITURGY, ..... 363 
 1. Quaker, 364 ; 2. Roman and Greek, 365 ; 3. Protestant, 367. 
 The Vernacular : 1. Roman, 369 ; 2. Protestant, 370. 
 Images and Pictures : 1. Reformed, 371 ; 2. Lutheran, 371. 
 
 COMPARATIVE TABLES, . ' . . .374 
 
 INDEX, ... . 391
 
 INTRODUCTION BY THE EDITOR. 
 
 ON many accounts it is necessary that this work of Winer's 
 should not go before the English public without some 
 kind of formal Introduction. The grounds of that necessity 
 may be stated in very few words. Comparative dogmatics, 
 or symbolism, as a branch of historical theology, has not had 
 much attention paid to it by English theologians : a few re- 
 marks, therefore, on this subject will be expedient. Winer's 
 treatment of the Confessions is distinguished from that of 
 most other authors by being absolutely free from polemics ; 
 the statements of the standard being simply placed in juxta- 
 position, and without much,. if any, doctrinal decision of his 
 own : the reproduction of such a neutral exhibition of rival 
 beliefs will demand a certain amount of justification or apology. 
 Finally, the book was written by a German, and dated, as it 
 were, from an earlier period in the century ; whence it results 
 that certain Continental systems have a disproportionate place, 
 and certain other systems more familiar to us are either left 
 in obscurity or omitted altogether : it will therefore be neces- 
 sary at least to indicate how this obliquity may be corrected 
 by the student. Whilst disposing of these preliminaries, 
 opportunity will be afforded to point out the value of the 
 work and the importance of the kind of theological study of 
 which it is one of the best auxiliaries. 
 
 I. Symbolism, in the conventional theological meaning of 
 the word, embraces the science of the various Confessions into
 
 xii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 which the Church has from the beginning condensed the sub- 
 stance of Christian doctrine. In its widest comprehension, 
 therefore, it includes every formula of faith from the Apostles' 
 Creed downwards ; and constructs what may be called a con- 
 fessional theology, based on the historical development of these 
 documents. In its more restricted application, it deals only 
 with the characteristic differences of these Confessions ; and, 
 inasmuch as the era of Confessions began, strictly speaking, 
 with the Eeformation, symbolism, or comparative symbolism, 
 resolves itself into an exhibition of the doctrinal points that 
 have divided, since the sixteenth century, the various com- 
 munities that bear the Christian name. In fact, at that time 
 the ancient oecumenical Creeds gave place to the modern 
 Confessions, as the universal badges or standards of professing 
 Christendom. Hence the present volume, like all others of 
 its kind, begins its statistical survey with the modern estate 
 of the Christian Church. It has little or nothing to do with 
 the ancient developments of truth and error, of which the 
 earlier symbols are the record. It virtually makes symbolism 
 a comparative view, not of the creeds, but of the confessions 
 of Christianity. Conventions rule the terminology of all the 
 sciences, the theological science included; and this term is 
 now fixed to signify the science of the modern differences of 
 Christian doctrine. 
 
 It ought to be remembered, however, by the student that 
 there is another and much older convention which vindicates 
 for three, and for three only, of the Confessions of Christian 
 faith, the name of symbols. The term carries us back to the 
 earliest ages of theological phraseology, when ecclesiastical 
 Greeks adopted the word from classical usage to signify 
 generally every outward sign or token of an inward mystery ? 
 and, more particularly, those compendiums of the faith which 
 were held as pledges of fidelity by the soldiers of Christ, and 
 signs or marks distinguishing the orthodox from all others. 
 The former use, that made the sacraments and other rites-
 
 INTRODUCTION. Xlll 
 
 symbols, pointed to the Tessera or pledge divided as the 
 remembrancer of a covenant : so baptism was a symbol be- 
 tween God and man in the Christian covenant. The latter 
 use, that made the Confessions of Faith symbols, pointed 
 to the watchw'ord, or sign, by which the soldiers might 
 distinguish friends from enemies. The first of these symbols 
 was the Apostles' Creed, gradually compacted to its present 
 form, as note after note was added for the contradiction 
 of heresy. The second was the Nicene Creed, which, with 
 its subsequent appendages, established the divinity of the 
 second and the third persons in the Trinity. The third was 
 the Athanasian Creed, of later date and unknown origin, which 
 was accepted, however, by the entire Christian w^orld, as its 
 symbol of belief as touching the Trinity and the Person of 
 Christ in particular, and the cardinal truths of Christianity in 
 general. 
 
 These three oecumenical or universal Creeds occupy the 
 same place in the ancient and comparatively uncorrupt church 
 which the confessions occupy in the modern church as in the 
 process of reform from its corruptions. The long interval pro- 
 duced all the corruptions of Christian doctrine, but no creeds 
 or confessions to formulate and sustain them. In arming itself 
 against the perversions of the faith, the Reformation fell back 
 upon the ancient creeds in their integrity. For the most part, 
 those symbols were laid as the foundation of the new super- 
 structure, and were assumed into its formularies ; thus estab- 
 lishing at the very outset a broad basis of connection and 
 unity with the faith as delivered by the apostles to the 
 church, and by the learning, zeal, and fidelity of the church 
 expressed in these primitive standards. Apart from contro- 
 versy, and viewed only as an historical fact, this is of great 
 importance, and must always be remembered in the study of 
 Winer's impartial exhibition, which takes this fact indeed for 
 granted, but does not of necessity make it prominent. Its 
 bearing upon the fair estimate of the relative Confessions of
 
 xiv INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Christendom is manifold. Some few aspects of it may bQ 
 stated here with advantage. 
 
 First, as it respects the Greek Church. This vast com- 
 munity, which, almost as literally now as at the beginning, 
 occupies the eastern portion of the old-world Christendom, 
 makes its boast that it is the Orthodox Church, never having 
 had any complicity with either heresy or schism. It knows 
 nothing of any doctrinal development in its faith since the 
 time when the three creeds were sent forth from its own 
 bosom to control the belief of the world. Whatever it holds 
 in common with Eomanism or Protestantism, it holds as the 
 heritage of the earliest ages. It disavows any ecumenical 
 council of Christendom, from the sixth downwards. It pro- 
 tests, not loudly indeed, but with a stern and most obdurate 
 tenacity, against the later additions that Rome has introduced ; 
 and does not side with Protestantism simply because it holds 
 Eomanism and Protestantism to be alike systems that are con- 
 tending on the basis of private judgment against the fixed 
 faith of the time and only Catholic Church. The addition of 
 Filioque, " proceeding from the Father and the Son" was an 
 offence against the one Christian creed that has never been 
 forgiven. In the high and serene theology of the Eastern 
 Church, most of the destructive doctrines of Romanism are 
 denounced with a vigour that Protestantism cannot surpass. 
 The supremacy of the Pope is a gigantic absurdity. Romanism 
 itself is the archetypal Protestantism; and has begotten the 
 sects of the Protestant world in its own image and likeness. 
 Hence the Oriental Church disdains to enter the arena of 
 controversy. It would not consent to have a table in the 
 comparative survey of the present volume. Indeed, it could 
 not have a place here were it not for the accident that a few 
 a very few Confessions have been sanctioned by isolated 
 synods, and have come to be regarded as authorized exponents 
 of Eastern doctrine. 
 
 The student must carry this suggestion with him in his
 
 INTRODUCTION. XV 
 
 estimate of the relative place of the Greek Church among 
 these standards. It will help to clear his ideas on many 
 points. It will explain, for instance, the scanty place which 
 that old community for, with all its diversities, it is but one 
 holds in the volume. The Orientals decline the entire theory 
 of " development," and reject it with all its consequences. 
 It declares every theory new : its cry is " the old is better." 
 It holds that the whole faith, in its integrity, was once de- 
 livered to the saints ; and that the earliest creeds were simply 
 the scriptural doctrine set in a frame of new words only new 
 words according to the necessities of controversy. Its never- 
 failing watchword, which it has always had in readiness to 
 meet every advance and every protest from Western Christen- 
 dom, is that " the faith was given to the charge of Christian 
 love, and only by love can be defended." It regards the 
 Church from age to age as the living interpreter as well as 
 guardian of the mysteries of faith. It denies that the Church 
 has ever spoken in a collective and universal character, or with 
 an, oecumenical voice, since the earliest times. Hence it has 
 no confessions .with which to meet the counter-confessions of 
 modern times. Those which are collated in this volume, for 
 instance, bear the signature after all only of individual men, 
 " profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in 
 righteousness :" nothing more. This will explain, further, the 
 attitude of the East towards the Pontifical system : it is that 
 of the " Catholic, Orthodox Church," or rather " the Church," 
 towards " Komanism," the mother of Protestantism and of error. 
 Eastern Christendom knows no date later than Pentecost : it 
 has a date for the beginning of the carnal and human system 
 of Koine ; and, a fortiori, for every system of Protestantism. 
 Its proud boast is that it has never changed ; that it is un- 
 changeable ; and that both Eomanism and Protestantism are 
 seas the waves of which are spent when they reach its territory, 
 and can never overflow its borders. 
 
 It is obvious that Koine stands in a different relation to
 
 xvi INTRODUCTION. 
 
 these ancient oecumenical symbols, and to the general scope of 
 our modern tabulation of the standards. A few remarks, 
 purely historical and by no means controversial, may be useful 
 in reference to two points : first, as to the fact of the faithful 
 transmission of the ancient faith to modern times ; and, 
 secondly, as to the equally certain fact that modern Eomanism 
 is only one of the many parties in the general controversy of 
 Christendom. What is involved in these affirmations will 
 appear in the sequel. 
 
 The three ancient symbols were preserved faithfully during 
 the ages of corruption. Not one of their positive state- 
 ments was formally contradicted. However near the errors 
 of the middle ages might approach to some of their positions, 
 and affect them indirectly and by implication, the old com- 
 munities never formally violated the articles of their creeds. 
 These always occupied their central or fundamental place, 
 monuments of a purer age, and silent protests against in- 
 numerable heresies that were clustering around their state- 
 ments, though not actually contradicting them. One word 
 alone separated East and West in relation to those symbols. 
 But that one word does not separate between Eomanism and 
 Protestantism ; and it is with the Eoman doctrine that we have 
 now to do. Those ancient Confessions of Faith were common 
 property at the Eeformation, and have always continued to be 
 such. This is a fact of great significance, of much more signifi- 
 cance than is conceded to it by many superficial controver- 
 sialists. It is of great moment in relation to the continuity 
 of the kingdom of Christ upon earth: the heavenly treasure 
 of truth has existed always, though in earthen vessels ; or, to 
 make a large application of St. Paul's words, in vessels not of 
 " gold and of silver," but " of wood and of earth," and some of 
 them entirely to " dishonour." This is a plain historical fact. 
 It cannot be denied, either by the sceptical critic of Christianity 
 on the one hand, or by the severest Christian polemic on the 
 other. It explains the vigorous life of the older systems : a
 
 INTRODUCTION. XV11 
 
 phenomenon not otherwise to be accounted for. But it is not 
 referred to now in anything like an apologetic interest. The 
 fact does not soften down or palliate the enormous differences 
 between the Eoman system and that modern theology which 
 is a return to the ancient. It does not suggest a basis of union: 
 the fabric and constitution of Papal doctrine renders that of all 
 impossible compromises the most impossible. The additions 
 to the simple faith ranging from the supreme doctrine of 
 mediation, through the whole economy of the work of Christ, 
 objective and subjective, down to the authority of the Church 
 and the last things, or at least the penultimate things, of 
 Eschatology can never be tolerated by the Protestant mind. 
 But still the fact remains ; and it suggests the abstract possi- 
 bility at least that interior fires, more searching even than 
 those of the Eeformation, may burn up the wood and the hay 
 and the stubble, leaving the pure and unadulterated gold of 
 truth. A merely historical consideration of the question can, 
 of course, go no further in this direction. 
 
 The other point in reference to the relation of Eome to the 
 subject of this Treatise is this, that, whatever may be said of 
 the Oriental community, Eoman Christendom has since the 
 Council of Trent descended to the arena of a common com- 
 petition, and its faith is to be numbered among the rival 
 confessions. This, of course, is flatly contradicted by those 
 whom it concerns. They acknowledge but one organized 
 Church, which has been the kingdom of Christ from the begin- 
 ning, and in the sixteenth century broke a long silence to con- 
 tradict heresy and declare its faith to the world. As to the 
 theory of the Church involved in this, nothing need now be 
 said. In controversy between Eome and the Eeform, that, of 
 course, would be the all-deciding question. But, apart from 
 controversy, the broad historical facts give their evidence; and, 
 in relation to our present work, they must be allowed their full 
 significance. Comparative dogmatics, or symbolism, must take 
 the standards of the Council of Trent, not as the doctrine of 
 
 b
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 the catholic and universal Church, but as the fixed expression 
 of the Eoman dogma, as distinguished from the Oriental and 
 from the formularies of the Protestant communions. Those 
 standards are framed in accordance with that idea. They keep 
 rival standards always in view : offensive or defensive, they 
 contend step by step for their theory and interpretation as 
 against others. The fathers of Trent were just like other 
 fathers ; their sessions were marked by just the same charac- 
 teristics which marked those from which proceeded the con- 
 fessions of the Lutherans and the Eeformed. It is an open 
 conflict There is not on the one hand a catholic, universal, and 
 divine Church, laying down its tranquil and everlasting doc- 
 trines ; and on the other a combination of heresies formulating 
 their deviations from ancient truth. While we hold fast this, 
 that the modern Eoman decrees and canons and catechisms 
 have only one column among many in the tabulation of rivalry, 
 we can also give them the benefit of the fact In theology, 
 historical theology, Eoman doctrine must be regarded as a 
 systematized confession of faith. This is not a question of 
 charity, or of toleration. The authorities quoted in the follow- 
 ing work, public and private, are documents put in the court 
 theological, to be examined and tested like all others. The 
 canons of the Council, setting aside their anathemas, are theo- 
 logical determinations which demand to be carefully weighed 
 on their merits ; and the apologies and defences of Bellarmine 
 and others, though admitted only on sufferance in such a court 
 as this, must be allowed the same fair hearing that is accorded 
 to Luther, Calvin, and Melanchthon. In short, and to sum up: 
 the original symbols are in this branch of historical theology 
 somewhat like standards of appeal ; and nothing is lost, but 
 everything is gained, by frankly admitting the elaborate system 
 of Eomanist dogmatics into the court, to give account of its 
 additions to the oscumenical creeds which all accept, the final 
 appeal being the Word of God. 
 
 As to the relations of the Protestant Confessions themselves
 
 INTRODUCTION. ' 
 
 to the original formulas of Christianity, the same principle of 
 historical justice demands that fair account should be taken of 
 the absolute fidelity of the bulk of Protestant Christendom to 
 the ancient faith, and of the difference which this establishes 
 among the several parties in this work placed on the same 
 level. The propriety of a juxtaposition so impartial will be 
 considered hereafter. Meanwhile, the fact of this distinction 
 ought to be made prominent. 
 
 The great bodies into which the fermenting elements of the 
 Reformation resolved themselves, were one in the maintenance 
 of the ancient creeds. Many differences separated the Evan- 
 gelical or Lutheran Churches from the Eeformed or Calvinistic; 
 and the Anglican Confession differed from both, by combining 
 the leading characteristics in its composite system of articles 
 and ritual. But all were as one in the acceptance of the 
 doctrinal formulas with which the early Church had been 
 content to declare its faith. Luther and Calvin widely se- 
 parated as to the sacraments and the doctrines of grace; 
 and their two theologies diverged widely as to many of the 
 subordinate questions affecting the Person of Christ, the nature 
 of the Atonement, and the means of grace. These differences 
 are reflected in the Anglican system, and have always been 
 evident enough in English divinity. Arminianism also, as a 
 subsequent development, brought into Eeformation theology 
 what it regarded as the doctrine of grace taught in the Scrip- 
 ture and in the Church before the days of Augustine ; and it 
 has, partly as a separate Eemonstrant community, but chiefly as 
 an element pervading some other systems, exerted a deep and 
 always increasing influence. But these great communities, 
 forming together the Protestant Christian world of the Eefor- 
 mation and post -Eeformation age, held firmly to the three 
 creeds, and to the fundamentals of the doctrine concerning 
 the person and mediation of Christ, the reality and perfection 
 of His atonement for human sin, the work of the Holy Spirit, 
 the constitution of the Christian Church, the office of the
 
 XX INTRODUCTION. 
 
 ministry, and the means of grace, of which those creeds are 
 the foundation. All this is undeniable truth. It is not 
 denied by any reasonable theologian. It is once plainly 
 stated by Winer, and everywhere assumed. But it should be 
 constantly kept in mind by those who study his survey of the 
 innumerable variations of the Protestant Confessions. 
 
 Polemics apart, it must also be remembered in the estimate 
 formed of these bodies which, on the one hand, have introduced 
 opposing Confessions, or, on the other, have been content to 
 decline altogether the formation or avowal of any specific 
 creed. As it respects the former, the Socinians, who have 
 no inconsiderable place in these tables, avowedly introduced 
 a new formula, taught as new, and supported as such by a 
 copious literature of catechisms and apologies. Whatever they 
 might plead as to the teaching of Scripture, and the latent, 
 misunderstood faith of antiquity, and the deep-rooted corrup- 
 tions of the Trinitarian Christendom, they never pretended to 
 join in any ancient Confessions of Christian Faith. In a 
 symbolical and confessional point of view and that alone 
 is ours here they came into the court with a new testimony. 
 Their creed was written afresh. Doctrine after doctrine 
 Trinity, Person of Christ, Sin, Atonement, Grace, Piighteous- 
 ness, Sacraments was remodelled. Their Confessions and 
 Catechisms are admitted, simply because all communities pro- 
 fessedly Christian are admitted. They claim to be heard, and 
 they are heard. As it respects the latter, those who decline 
 altogether to come into this court, and deny its jurisdiction, 
 they also must take the consequences of their silence or con- 
 tempt. Their faith, however vague and unformulated, has a 
 substance, and cannot be hid ; its documents must be found 
 somewhere, whether authoritative or not The further question 
 must not be discussed, whether a Christian Church or a Christian 
 community ought to exist without its specific and definite 
 testimony to the Christian truth. All that need now be 
 asserted is, that so it was not from the beginning, and that
 
 INTRODUCTION. Xxi 
 
 tlie representatives of comparative dogmatics, collating the for- 
 mularies of Christendom, have some show of reason in their 
 complaint of this deviation from the usage of Christendom as 
 a whole. There are indeed some chaotic comhinations of 
 Christian men from whose confessions it is a great comfort 
 to be relieved. No skill in the synoptist could locate or adjust 
 them. But there are some orthodox bodies, and many isolated 
 orthodox churches, the absence of whose standards is much to 
 be deplored. 
 
 The current of these remarks has been determined by the 
 relation of the ancient symbols to the present work. A few 
 additional observations must be made upon the nature of 
 the modern Confessions themselves; obviously only a few, 
 because Winer's work will here speak for itself. It gives 
 a clear, historical account of the standards, their origination, 
 their growth, their secret history, their literature, and, in fact, 
 all that pertains to them as a distinct theological literature. 
 This is done so completely as to render any addition super- 
 fluous, and so systematically as to make a closer analysis of 
 them impossible. But it may not be inexpedient to point out 
 some of the prominent notes that mark the distinction between 
 the modern Confessions and the ancient Creeds ; especially as 
 the tendency of the preceding observations has been to regard 
 them as co-ordinate and on the same footing as declarations of 
 Christian Faith. 
 
 The first and most obvious distinction is to be found in the 
 fact, that the early symbols were the personal profession of 
 faith, representing the characteristic of the man as he was a 
 Christian man. This was the case especially with the Apostles' 
 Creed, the parent and fountain of all innumerable subsequent 
 Confessions, unless, indeed, we carry their parentage higher 
 and up to the baptismal formula in St. Matthew. Be that 
 as it may, the earliest use of the earliest creed, in its simplest 
 form as the expansion of the baptismal formula, was the in- 
 dividual avowal of faith in the leading verities of Christian
 
 X xii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 faith. As such it was expounded to the catechumen, and as 
 such it was engraven on the mind of the baptized child. As 
 time rolled on, article after article was added for the contra- 
 diction of heresy ; but its original use was not lost. It was 
 the genuine " milk " for the babes of the Church, which was 
 not withdrawn, even after the " strong meat " of the two later 
 creeds was prepared for a more adult Christendom. As a 
 personal confession it has never entirely lost its place, at least 
 in the West. The Nicene symbol may have superseded it in 
 the East ; but has been only combined with it throughout a 
 large portion of the West. A mass of superstitious legends has 
 been connected with its origin, especially by the Eomanists ; 
 and various opinions have been entertained as to its authority 
 and value ; but it cannot be denied that it lingers still among 
 the majority of modern Christian communities as an individual 
 testimony of Christian belief. The same may be said of its 
 ampler representative and successor : that also has been from 
 age to age in some of its forms, over the greater part of Chris- 
 tendom, both a private and public avowal of faith. In a much 
 more limited degree, the stern Athanasian has served the same 
 purpose : rightly or wrongly, a great multitude of Christian 
 people on the most solemn occasions use it as the formula of 
 their general belief. This does not hold good of any modern 
 Confessions. They represent the convictions, not of Christian 
 men as Christian men, but of Churches as Churches. What 
 the symbols were to the individual, the Confessions are to the 
 community. The former were binding on the members of the 
 Church, the latter only on its ministers as the expounders of 
 its doctrine. There is no modern formulary that has ever 
 been imposed upon the individual as necessary to his com- 
 munion with his brethren ; but there are few which have not 
 been more or less obligatory on those who have been entrusted 
 with ministerial functions and responsibilities. 
 
 The ancient symbols were, broadly speaking, notes of the 
 unity of the Church ; the modern Confessions are, broadly
 
 INTRODUCTION. Xxiii 
 
 speaking again, notes of its necessary diversity. The question 
 need not be discussed, where the responsibility of Christian 
 differences lies. That must be referred to a higher tribunal. 
 Suffice that the internal unfaithfulness of the witnessing 
 Church has been the cause of them ; and that the great and 
 all-important separation on which modern Confessions mainly 
 rest, was an absolute necessity to the life and health of Chris- 
 tianity. As to the lesser divisions among the evangelical 
 communities themselves, all that need be said is, that they 
 have been overruled for good. It would be presumptuous to 
 add that they have been ordained of God ; or that, in the 
 Holy Ghost's catholic administration of the many Churches 
 by means of which His one Kingdom is maintained, these 
 divisions have been provided for and subordinated to His 
 purpose. But it is the very wisdom of charity to maintain 
 that they have never been disowned by Him. His spiritual 
 kingdom ruleth over all the several manifestations of its earthly 
 and transitory form. Unless this is believed, there can be no 
 satisfaction in the study of a book like that which now lies 
 before us. He who entertains the rigid conviction that the varia- 
 tions in evangelical Confessions are no other than the record 
 of heresies that never should have existed, or of differences 
 that are fatal to the unity of the Church, or of perversions of 
 the simplicity of the faith that obstruct its diffusion, is with- 
 out the first requisite for an intelligent study of symbolical 
 theology. He may enter thoroughly into comparative dog- 
 matics, as a controversialist ; but the true and profound secret 
 of historical theology is closed against him. Indeed, to such 
 a student the history of the Christian Church must be from 
 the beginning downwards a bewildering chaos. But, studying 
 on other and better principles, he will see that manifold corrup- 
 tions of doctrine have never suppressed the glorious unity or 
 the fundamental truth as it is in Jesus. He will see that the 
 general history of the three centuries past has been on the 
 whole a mighty vindication of original, catholic Christianity.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 He will learn to be tolerant of the differences among the 
 evangelical Confessions ; recognising their essential oneness 
 amidst their accidental divergences, and deeply convinced, that 
 whatever clothing wrought by human hands may be thrown 
 around the Protestant doctrine, its " body is of Christ." Nor 
 will he value his own Confession less, or hold to it less 
 tenaciously, because he is constrained to admit, that com- 
 munities adopting other standards are carrying on the cause 
 of the universal kingdom in a different style, as it respects 
 subordinate matters, but with equal zeal, and an equal 
 blessing. 
 
 Another important difference is suggested by the fact, that 
 the ancient symbols were mainly designed to be incorporated 
 in the worship of the Church, while the modern Confessions 
 are exclusively theological documents, deposited in the ark of 
 every community as its standard of truth and protest against 
 error. The profession of Christian faith in the public congre- 
 gation, as part of the liturgical service of the worshipping 
 assembly, may be traced to times beyond which the memory 
 of the Church cannot go, and is continued to the present day 
 throughout a large portion of Christendom, both reformed and 
 unreformed. Indeed, there are very few Christian communi- 
 ties which do not, in some form or other, if not by creeds, yet 
 by hymns which embody their substance, lift up to the Supreme 
 their devout profession of faith. As to the ancient symbols, 
 it cannot be denied that this service was bound up with their 
 original design, and has been from the beginning their charac- 
 teristic function. The modem Church has not constructed its 
 formulas on the same principle ; no new creed has been con- 
 structed to supersede in public worship the old ones ; none 
 have been devised to accompany them. The formularies, articles, 
 and Confessions of the later evangelical communities are theo- 
 logical documents, belonging rather to the teaching than to the 
 worshipping service of the Church. They are not symbols of 
 belief, which give pledges to God of fidelity to His truth, so
 
 INTRODUCTION. XXV 
 
 much as symbols that give pledges of fidelity to that truth in 
 the presence of the world. It is necessary to remember this 
 clear line of distinction. It explains the marked difference 
 in tone and phraseology between the older and the more 
 modern formularies. The former, as uttered to God, make 
 mention of His name and His truth only, keeping human 
 names and human errors out of view ; the latter, as uttered 
 to man, deal largely in the enumeration of heresies, and in 
 their elaborate confutation, and in their earnest rebuke and 
 rejection. 
 
 Lastly, it must not be omitted that the modern Confessions 
 stand in relation to the early Creeds as their necessary supple- 
 ments, filling up their deficiencies, and so rounding them into 
 the perfect fulness of Christian doctrine. It is not' meant 
 that this was their design ; only that this makes the difference 
 which the comparison suggests. Where the older documents 
 are scanty, the later are full ; and what the earlier omit, the 
 latter amply supply. Some such difference, indeed, may be 
 observed to exist between those original Creeds themselves : 
 the exterior relations of the Trinity are not hinted at in the 
 Apostles' ; they are sharply defined in the Nicene ; they 
 are exhibited with all the exquisite refinement possible 
 to human language in the Athanasian. But with the doc- 
 trines of the Trinity and the Person of Christ, or the In- 
 carnation, the process of expansion ends. The mediatorial 
 office and ministry of Christ, and the work of the Holy Spirit, 
 in the application of redemption to the individual, are scarcely 
 indicated in any of them. There lies their deep deficiency, 
 the effect of which on the history of theology and the Christian 
 Church can hardly be estimated. Now where the ancient 
 creeds are silent, the modern Confessions are most copious and 
 explicit. The nature, and penalty, and universality of sin, the 
 expiatory sacrifice of Christ, and all that its operation and its 
 defence demand, the righteousness of faith, with all its defi- 
 nitions and safeguards, the inspiration and authority of the
 
 XXvi INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Holy Scriptures, the true characteristics and notes of the 
 Church, the relation of the sacraments to the means, are loci 
 communes of theology, which the ancient creeds touch lightly 
 where they touch them at all. It might seem as if the assaults 
 of heresy had never been directed against these vital doctrines 
 when they were constructed. A mere censorious criticism 
 would go further, and say that the " doctrine of the cross," 
 and the connected truths with which man's acceptance and 
 final salvation are essentially bound up, are not made as pro- 
 minent as they should be. Upon these the modern Con- 
 fessions throw a flood of light. That is, they exhaustively 
 bring out the scriptural doctrine, and reproduce its harmonies : 
 under various aspects, indeed, according to their several 
 theories, but all uniting in certain most important elements, 
 and, by their differences on subordinate points, only furnishing 
 a more thorough view of the one subject. It may fairly be 
 said of the leading formularies of the Lutheran and Reformed 
 types of doctrine, which in some sort have regulated the 
 rest, that they none of them fail to instruct sinful men aright 
 in the nature of the common ground of hope, and in the 
 methods and conditions of the attainment of the common sal- 
 vation. Thus they collectively and individually may lay claim 
 to the earliest honour put upon the creeds : they are emphati- 
 cally each the Rule of Faith to its own communion ; always 
 understanding by that expression, a common directory of faith 
 and practice subordinate to the supreme standard of Holy 
 Scripture. This is true, notwithstanding that in many points 
 they offend all. By the very fact of their differences on many 
 comparatively subordinate topics, their imperfection and in- 
 completeness is proved. They cannot all be in all things 
 right. But they conspire to indicate the way in which the 
 perfect faith is to be sought ; and predict a time when they 
 will, if it seem good to the Holy Ghost, be merged in one 
 general Confession, as true to the Scriptures as the Scriptures 
 are to the truth of God.
 
 INTRODUCTION. Xxvii 
 
 II. It was mentioned at the outset, and the reader will soon 
 discover for himself, that this work is simply an historical 
 exhibition of the differences of the Confessions, without any 
 infusion of the controversial element. It adheres stedfastly 
 to its one and ruling principle, that of letting the standards 
 speak for themselves. There is no polemic on the one hand, 
 no harmonizing irenicum on the other. This is a characteristic 
 of Winer's book, which makes it almost unique in this branch 
 of theological literature. But a glance at that literature will 
 better locate the work than any general description. 
 
 When the several Confessions of the Lutheran and Eeformed 
 Churches were produced, they speedily gave birth to a vigorous 
 series of works devoted to their explanation. First came the 
 polemical writers, of whom Chemnitz on the Lutheran and 
 Bellarmine on the Romanist side were the most eminent as 
 between Rome and the Reformation, while the contest between 
 the Lutheran and the Reformed themselves was conducted by 
 Hospinian in his Concordia discors, and Hutter in his Concordia 
 concors. After nearly a century had passed, the symbolical 
 books, as they had by this time been termed, required historical 
 introductions. This service was rendered by Carpzov, and 
 Walch, and Semler : the two latter especially have left little 
 to be desired as to the literature of the question. The com- 
 parative treatment of the Confessions was begun by Planck, 
 who, however, made Protestantism his starting point ; and in a 
 theological interest, as the titles of his works show, including 
 as they do, " the fundamental ideas, the specific differences and 
 the practical consequences." Then followed, in the early part 
 of the present century, Marheineke's work, which, though the 
 title hardly betrays it, is coloured by a Lutheran dogmatic 
 influence, and in a masterly manner exhibits the internal 
 development and harmony of each system apart. Winer then 
 followed, in 1824, with a comparative view of the several 
 doctrinal systems arranged in a tabular form, and supported 
 by copious quotations from the standards in the original This
 
 XXviii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 work was a novelty in its strictly historical character. It was 
 the first and the last that appeared on this purely undogmatic 
 principle ; and as such it has held its ground, having appeared 
 in successive editions, the last of which, now translated, ap- 
 peared as lately as 18G6, substantially unchanged. After the 
 publication of Winer's treatise, the tide of symbolical literature 
 set in with great strength. Mohler, one of the ablest and 
 most conscientious of modern Eomanist divines, led the way 
 in his Symbolism, which brought all the doctrinal standards of 
 Protestantism to the bar of Roman Catholic orthodoxy. His 
 work is a subtle though clear apology for Tridentine doctrine ; 
 and is exceedingly valuable to the theologian, even in the 
 English translation of Robertson, as giving all that can be 
 said on that side of the question. What Bossuet attempts in 
 an oratorical and unsatisfactory, because unreal manner, in his 
 Variations of Protestantism, Mohler essays to establish in a 
 calm and scientific manner: the deviation of Protestantism 
 from the consensus of Catholic doctrine in regard to every 
 cardinal article of the Christian faith. His work was held in 
 unbounded esteem by his own community ; and it was highly 
 regarded even by his opponents. The challenge he threw down 
 was immediately taken up by some of the foremost divines of 
 the Evangelical Church ; and, indeed, by some who would 
 scarcely be acknowledged as evangelical The leader of the 
 Tubingen School, Baur, was the first who replied ; and the 
 final form of his answer, The Antithesis of Catholicism and 
 Protestantism, remains a very valuable work, as it were an 
 atonement for much that is destructive in his writings. Mar- 
 heineke, attacked in his own province, roused himself to expose 
 many of Mohler's fallacies. Nitzsch also, the most consistent 
 Protestant of all these advocates, came forward with an exhaus- 
 tive reply, which is full of symbolical learning, and exhibits a 
 fine appreciation of the points in which a profound study will 
 find elements of agreement where a superficial glance will find 
 only variance. Sack, Tafel, and others joined in the theolo-
 
 INTEODUCTION. XXIX 
 
 gical tournament; it may, indeed, be said that each of the 
 systems of Continental Protestantism, from Luther to Sweden- 
 borg, which Mohler had attacked, furnished its own champion. 
 Since Holder's time a great variety of treatises have appeared, 
 most of which need no allusion here, as they are referred to in 
 the notes of the following work. Suffice that through the 
 whole range of them there is not found one which occupies 
 the position that Winer's took. Either they present the several 
 Confessions of each particular communion ; or they survey the 
 several standards from their own individual point of view, and 
 for controversial purposes; or, if they furnish a general sketch, 
 it is in their own words, and in the way of synopsis. Winer 
 still stands alone, in his three characteristics : first, that of 
 exhibiting all the standards of the Christian world (with the 
 exceptions hereafter to be mentioned) ; secondly, that of giving 
 the very words of the standards themselves in apt juxtaposi- 
 tion ; and, thirdly, that of abstinence from polemical disserta- 
 tion or harmonizing. It must be observed, however, that this 
 last observation holds good only of Winer's original. The 
 edition presented to the English reader was edited by Dr. 
 Preuss, a Protestant controversialist, who will be found to have 
 here and there added some incisive notes, retained in this 
 edition for the sake of completeness, and indeed for their own 
 value. Their value is not a whit lessened by the fact that 
 Dr. Preuss has yielded in America to influence that need not 
 be here further referred to, and become reconciled to Eome, 
 his former deadly enemy. It is only right to mention this. 
 For the rest, these notes are so few that they by no means 
 affect the purely historical and uncontroversial character of 
 Winer's work, as here given to the English reader. 
 
 But before another word is said on this subject, it must be 
 admitted that this is a great achievement. To set forth in 
 order, and with absolute impartiality, the endless variations 
 of Christian thought, through the entire process of the loci 
 communes of theology, in all their dogmatic comprehensive-
 
 XXX INTRODUCTION. 
 
 ness and subtlety, is a task for which very few men could 
 be found competent. Many have taken it in hand ; but, 
 before proceeding far, have been overpowered by their honest 
 prepossessions, and surrendered themselves to the genius loci 
 of their own Confession. But Winer has held the scales with 
 an even and untremulous hand. He has done justice to every 
 side of every question: the copious extracts from the standards 
 are left to speak for themselves ; while innumerable points of 
 less importance, both in dogma and its history, are thrown into 
 the notes and observations. Now, there is no question here 
 as to the character of a theology that is capable of dealing 
 thus impartially with all sides. Opinions will differ widely 
 on this subject. Some would regard it as a brand upon the 
 theologian, that he should be capable of sustaining his neu- 
 trality equally and everywhere in the sacred domain of truth ; 
 others would count that his highest recommendation, and regard 
 him as the type of what all teachers of theology should be. 
 This question need not be touched here. Suffice, that a man 
 was found competent to the task, and who has accomplished 
 it in such a manner that his work might be taken as a text- 
 book in almost all the schools of modern theology. Sus- 
 picion might be aroused here and there; but no more than 
 suspicion. 
 
 This leads at once to the question of the practical benefit 
 of such an impartial survey. Assuming that the present work 
 is what it professes to be, a clear and undistorted reflection 
 of the forms into which the Christian formularies have been 
 shaped, to what use can the student apply it ? This ques- 
 tion is best answered by considering briefly the relation such 
 a comparative view bears to the several branches of theological 
 study. 
 
 To begin with the most important, there is a pure Biblical 
 theology which is the standard and test of every other ; that 
 is, the exhibition of truth as it is found in the Scriptures, in 
 its variety of definition and statement, in its gradual develop-
 
 INTEODUCTION. XXxi 
 
 ment from dispensation to dispensation, in its different types 
 as presented by the several schools of inspired teachers, and 
 in its organic unity as the result of the superintending in- 
 spiration of the Divine Spirit. This must needs be the norm 
 and criterion of all that is called theology in the Christian 
 Church. That it is so, is the theory, it may boldly be said, 
 of every community under heaven known by the name of 
 Christ. What may seem to be exceptions are not really ex- 
 ceptions. The old and corrupt Churches, that live and move 
 and have their being in tradition, profess, these standards 
 being judges, the same allegiance to Scripture which the 
 purer Churches that protest against them profess. What in 
 act they may deny, in word they maintain. The Romanist 
 apology, for instance, for the existence of the Roman Catholic 
 system of church doctrine and discipline is, in the last resort, 
 an 'appeal to Scripture. It is true that there is an enormous 
 qualification of this fact. The Tridentine dogma of inspiration, 
 in other respects as true as that of the Protestants, is, as it were, 
 nullified by a series of figments : it extends that inspiration 
 to more than the Bible contains ; it tacitly transfers its virtue 
 to an " authentic " Vulgate ; and, above all, it establishes a 
 co-ordinate inspiration directing the ecclesiastical traditions 
 which interpret, by development or otherwise, the unwritten 
 Scripture handed down by the apostles, and the truths that 
 the Bible contains only in germ. This concurrent endowment 
 of the visible Church with inspiration, as having its organ and 
 living voice in the infallible Pontiff, is the fundamental error 
 that vitiates all. But there stands the original theory still. 
 Tradition and development, with their living interpreter, alike 
 are driven by an absolute necessity into the supreme court 
 for a last decision. In every controversy with Rome this is 
 a tacit, if not expressed, assumption of both parties : the one 
 cannot, the other dares not, deny that there is a law, and a 
 testimony concerning that law, surrounding and higher than 
 all the decisions of men. To that supreme court all evan-
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 gelical communities, without reserve, carry their appeal. Here, 
 again, the seeming exceptions are not real exceptions. Some 
 of them may betray mystical tendencies which would bring 
 the ' soul of men into more immediate relations with God, 
 and make the Church a recipient of revelation without tfo 
 Word. The Quakers, for instance, who hold a large place 
 in this volume, may seem to waver between two theories for 
 mysticism, like every other tendency, must have its theories 
 as to the supremacy of Scripture. One side may hold that 
 the internal light in every redeemed man is to be the test of 
 Scripture, another that Scripture is to be the test of the 
 internal light ; but both practically agree to solve these dif- 
 ficulties by a more or less consistent or inconsistent appeal 
 to the words of the written oracles. It is needless to dilate 
 further upon this fact. Its application to the theological 
 use of this comparative survey is obvious. Here we have 
 no Biblical theology ; that is entirely excluded. The table? 
 are constructed without any reference to Scripture ; the sayings 
 of God's "Word being, as it were, the only thing omitted. But 
 he who uses the volume must not fail to do for himself what 
 the book does not do. He has the sum of all the creeds before 
 him, his own included ; and must conscientiously examine all 
 in the light of the infallible Word. Doing this, he will un- 
 derstand better both the systems he has to study and the 
 standard to which they are all brought. There is no more 
 effectual method of studying the variations of rival systems 
 than that of hearing their pleas before this bar; and cer- 
 tainly, on the other hand, one of the best commentaries 
 upon the New Testament is to be found in the comparison 
 of the interpretations put upon it by the rival theologies. No 
 one who has studied the controversies concerning the Person of 
 Christ, or Justification by Faith, as registered in this volume, 
 will hesitate to acknowledge that they have shed a clear light 
 upon the terminology of the New Testament epistles. In fact, 
 however paradoxical the assertion may seem, it is one that all
 
 INTRODUCTION. XXxiii 
 
 thorough students of these controversies will verify : that the 
 subtle discussions of the polemics on the one person and two 
 natures of the Redeemer, the bearings of active and passive 
 righteousness, the nature of imputation in all its aspects, shed 
 much more light upon the Scriptures to which they appeal 
 than they shed upon the subject they deal with. A yet 
 bolder word may be spoken. There are many topics in 
 Biblical theology which cannot be thoroughly understood but 
 by those who study them in the light of the polemics of the 
 sixteenth century. It would be an offence against the funda- 
 mental hermeneutical canon of the self-interpreting sufficiency 
 and perspicuity of Scripture to say generally that its interpre- 
 tation as Scripture is in any sense dependent on controversy. 
 But it may safely be affirmed, that few subordinate helps can 
 be mentioned which are more effectual than the careful com- 
 parison of the various constructions that have been put upon 
 the same words and sentences by the framers of the several 
 Confessions of Christendom. The Bible that settles all differ- 
 ences often has a reflex light thrown upon it by the differences 
 that it settles. 
 
 Again, the catholic exhibition of the Confessions of Christen- 
 dom, without polemics or harmony, is of great value in the 
 study of historical theology, or the development of Christian 
 doctrine. Perhaps it would be better to correct the usual 
 phrase, and say Christian dogma. The doctrine of Christi- 
 anity was not left for development; its development rail 
 through the ages of gradual revelation, but was ended with 
 the faith once for all delivered through the apostles to the 
 saints. As Moses began, so St. John ended, the slow process 
 by which the truth as it is in Jesus was unfolded to the 
 Church. Development in the history of theology, as such, 
 has been only the more and perfect definition and systematiza- 
 tion of the doctrines already given in their full sufficiency : 
 a development governed mainly by the operation of two laws. 
 On the one hand, the necessity of formal instruction in a 
 
 c
 
 XXxiv INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Church which gradually pervaded all ranks of society, incor- 
 porated all grades of culture, and adapted itself to all ranges 
 of human civilisation, would lead to a scientific arrangement 
 of truth, and deduction of consequences from each truth in 
 particular, and application of the whole to the unvarying pro- 
 blems of human life. Hence a sure development of dogma, 
 throwing the Divine doctrine into moulds fashioned by men. On 
 the other hand, the necessity of encountering false doctrine and 
 condemning it, whether the errors of unbelief without or the 
 errors of heresy within, would lead to the same result The 
 history of the development of Christian theology in its Creeds 
 and Confessions, is mainly occupied with the decisions of con- 
 tested questions ; in fact, had there been no such contests, there 
 would have been but a scanty development of dogma. It is 
 needless to say that the student of theology must needs study 
 it historically ; unless he does so, his views will be narrow and 
 superficial This being assumed, he cannot do better than 
 make Winer's one of his text-books. Not by any means 
 the only one ; for its service in this department, though ex- 
 tremely important, is limited. For instance, it touches only 
 in an indirect manner the grand development of dogma which 
 formed its final expression in the three Creeds. It is true 
 that most of the early questions of contention were brought 
 again into the arena after the Eeformation, and have the 
 record of their settlement in the modern Confessions. But 
 that is not the case with all of them ; and our present volume, 
 a good adjunct of other books, will not supersede the elaborate 
 works that make the universal development of Christian doc- 
 trine their subject 
 
 Finally, it follows as matter of course, that this work is 
 a useful aid to the student of dogmatic theology as such ; 
 that is to say, of every minister of the gospel, whatever may 
 be the Confession to which he owes allegiance. Of course, it 
 is not here that he will learn his theology, or find the system 
 that represents his creed. The book is too general and
 
 INTRODUCTION. XXXV 
 
 scanty for that. Sketches and outlines of theological doctrine 
 ought not to satisfy the teacher of divinity, whose business is 
 to make his own dogmatic system as familiar to his mind in 
 all its details as it is precious to his heart in its funda- 
 mental principles. But it is of inestimable service to mark 
 the doctrinal definitions of systems other than our own ; to 
 use them as interpreters, as correctives, and as supplements. 
 No sound theologian inherits a dogmatic system so complete 
 as to defy improvement in his own hands, and no theologian 
 is bound by any dictate of humility or modesty to abstain 
 from amending the best definitions of his predecessors and 
 masters. Let the student, even the young student, make the 
 experiment upon any doctrine : say the doctrine of the Eucha- 
 rist, which, beyond every doctrine, has taxed and exhausted 
 the energies of the confessional divines. Let him attempt 
 an analytical reconstruction of the dogma, noting some points 
 among the erroneous theories of Confessions other than his own 
 which are perhaps by his own too much neglected, and observing 
 refinements of phraseology to which his line of thought may not 
 have accustomed his mind, and especially paying attention to 
 aspects of the question which in the heat of controversy have 
 by his own confession had slight justice done them. The 
 result will be useful to him, while the process will have been 
 stimulating. In general, and to dismiss this subject, it may 
 be averred that he will have the best dogmatic system at his 
 command who, faithful to his particular Confession, has care- 
 fully collated every other with it. 
 
 The transition is easy to the polemical theology which has 
 occupied so large a space in theological literature during 
 the last three hundred years, indeed, more or less, from 
 the beginning. The impartial survey of the entire field of 
 results which this volume contains, is of essential service in 
 this branch of study : perhaps its service is more marked here 
 than anywhere else. Controversies there must be among the 
 churches visible on earth; in this sense also the estate of
 
 XXXviii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 point, or mastered its exact terminology. The student who 
 would avoid this evil must not be content with current and 
 traditional notions of the dogmas of rival communities. He 
 must examine for himself, and make his own the ipsissima 
 verba of the canon, decree, article, or catechetical definition. 
 They are given fairly and fully in this volume; and the selec- 
 tion is not the less valuable because it is confined always to 
 the question in hand. The passages are in every case the 
 proof passages of the Creed or Confession ; and given in the 
 original, even to the retention of the modern Greek phraseology. 
 Moreover, as a handbook or guide in Christian Polemics proper, 
 Winer's book has the additional recommendation of including 
 excerpts from some of the leading controversialists all round, 
 from Bellarmine to Barclay. Fortified by this compendium of 
 fixed and sure authorities, the student may safely explore his 
 way. He will see what men have said and what they have 
 not said. He will see some errors to be worse than he has 
 been in the habit of thinking them to be; others will be 
 robbed of some of their conventional evil characteristics. He 
 will often perceive, what otherwise would not be perceived, the 
 reason why one opinion has been held as the necessary result 
 of another, and why a certain truth has been renounced because 
 a previous error had made it inconvenient. He will learn that 
 there is an analogy of untruth as well as of truth, an analogy 
 of infidelity as well as an analogy of faith. Above* all, he will 
 not fail, if working on sound principles, to see more and more 
 clearly the longer he studies, that the innumerable variety of 
 contradictory opinions only tends to bring out into more 
 luminous distinctness the glorious outline of the one system 
 of truth on which Christianity rests. 
 
 A word must be said, before passing, on the Comparative 
 Tables at the end of the volume. They deserve attention as 
 the product of no little thought and skill: in fact, no part 
 of the work made a heavier demand upon the ability of the 
 author, certainly no part has occasioned the editor more trouble
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 in the reproduction ; and, in this case, what required much 
 care in the preparation will require equal care in the use. 
 The student and by the student is meant especially the 
 young student, for whom this work is mainly designed will 
 do well to make himself master of the technical principle on 
 which the Table it is only one in reality is constructed ; 
 and reward his author by noting the tact with which a multi- 
 tude of harmonious and discordant elements are articulated 
 into one homogeneous structure. He should then, and will if 
 he is thoroughly in earnest, commit to memory the entire table, 
 first as a whole, and then in its divergent lines. If memory is 
 made only the minister of the judgment, he will have acquired 
 a good general view of the entire body of Christian theology 
 in its leading outlines, and have lodged safely in his mind a 
 sort of nucleus around which may crystallize a miscellaneous 
 mass of knowledge otherwise acquired. 
 
 But here lies a danger, to the consideration of which a 
 separate paragraph may be allotted, as it concerns not these 
 tables only, but the subject and treatment of this work gene- 
 rally. It would be a fatal mistake to think that an intimate 
 familiarity with tables like these makes a theologian. It is 
 the very principle and theory of the volume to preclude that 
 supposition. It gives only the materials, which the intelligent 
 reader must use according to his own discretion and the 
 exercise of f his own rightly directed and rightly guarded private 
 judgment. The present section of this Introduction has been 
 occupied with the fact that Winer gives only a comparative 
 view of the doctrinal systems as they are, and as they are 
 supported by authorized documents and standard expositors. 
 This law of the work must be again made prominent. The 
 function and glory of theology is, after all, not the know- 
 ledge of these confessional statements, but the fine perception 
 of their broader or more refined distinctions, and the thoughtful, 
 not to say philosophical, appreciation of the underlying spirit 
 of these distinctions, and the education of the theological eye
 
 xl INTRODUCTION. 
 
 to perceive the process by which they shade into each other. 
 What kind of labour this involves, and how richly that labour 
 is rewarded,, this is not the place to say. But it is the place 
 to say that it is indispensable : unless the student will under- 
 take it, he must be content to remain a sciolist in a science 
 which, equally with all others, if not more than all others, 
 demands profoundness and exactitude. He will be " ever 
 learning, never coming to a knowledge of the truth," to quote 
 the apostle's words in a sense somewhat different from their 
 first intention. He will acquire, perhaps, a certain expertness 
 in words, but the things that are the soul of these words will 
 remain hidden from him. He will be in great danger of 
 sinking into the number, only too large, of conventional theo- 
 logians, confident enough until their neighbour comes and 
 searches them. He is exposed, moreover, to a worse peril 
 than even this : to the peril of joining the herd of those 
 babblers who in the present day seem to have made Christian 
 dogma, as they delight to call it, the arena or rather the victim 
 of their superficial exercitations, and use the scanty knowledge 
 which they have acquired in pastime to point their ridicule at 
 mysteries as far beyond their capacity as are the interior secrets 
 of the familiar sun. Unless that spirit, in all its forms and 
 manifestations and works, is as abhorrent to him as anything 
 that he can possibly abhor, he may call himself indeed a 
 theologian, but theology has no part in him. 
 
 Therefore the student should make these tables only the 
 basis of other tables of his own. In constructing them he is 
 not cramped as the printer has been cramped in the endeavour 
 to present them. He has an unlimited scope, and an un- 
 limited margin. Then he must go to work on certain prin- 
 ciples of his own. As to the more formal and mechanical 
 part of his work, he may fill in the vacant places of the table 
 of which more hereafter and give their location and general 
 character to some systems of faith that ought to be included : 
 this will enlarge his classification to some extent, though not
 
 INTRODUCTION, t xli 
 
 so nmcli as might be expected. Then, as to what is rather 
 material than formal, he should give a separate table to each 
 of the loci of theology, from the Scriptures downwards : taking, 
 that is, the order of them as given in this volume, which is 
 not necessarily the best 
 
 Supposing him to begin with the sources or documents of 
 theology, he must dedicate to this subject a table in which the 
 relative place of every Confession is assigned, studying his 
 definitions well, and showing the influence of every divergency 
 upon the community that represents it, and upon the system 
 of doctrine held by that community. If he has a quick eye 
 and sure hand, this sketch will itself expand into a very com- 
 plete digest of Christian theology : for, which of the religious 
 communions does not bear in almost every article of its creed 
 the stamp and influence of its peculiar view of the inspiration 
 and authority of the Word of God ? It is patent enough that 
 this differentiates Eomish doctrine from every other. It is not 
 so patent that here lies a marked distinction between Rome 
 and the East, to the advantage of the latter ; and that the 
 difference between the Lutheran and the Reformed theologies 
 is not slightly affected by their relative view of the Word of 
 God; and that each of the subordinate systems shows to a 
 quick perception the effect of aberrations, sometimes almost 
 imperceptible, on this subject. 
 
 Having thus practised his hand, the student may easily and 
 surely go on. The doctrine of the Holy Trinity will be the 
 superscription of one of his most important tables : one of his 
 most important ; in some respects one of the easiest, but in 
 others one of the most difficult. Here he will have, though 
 it is a bold word to say, more unanimity than on any other 
 subject. But there are shades of difference between East and 
 West between Lutheran, Reformed, and Arminian which will 
 task his subtlety ; especially when he goes beyond his guide 
 in this volume, and traces the influence of the Subordination 
 and Arian theories on those Confessions which hold fast their
 
 xlii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 integrity in general, but show the particular effect of theory 
 on their doctrine of mediation and atonement, and the Person 
 of Christ. Moreover, he must learn to trace the delicate 
 influence of Sabellianism on modern Confessions, venial in 
 some forms of mysticism, but fatal in the grotesque theology 
 of Swedenborg. And he will not have thoroughly accom- 
 plished this part of his task, unless he indicates, or tries to 
 indicate his very failure here will be profitable the effect 
 on modern theology of a careful distinction between the abso- 
 lute or immanent, and the relative or economical, Trinity. 
 But this will require that he should descend from the general 
 doctrine to the intricacies of the minor presentations of it, as 
 represented by the federal theology of a past age, which, how- 
 ever eternally true in some of its broad principles, has never 
 been formulated in any Confession. A more obvious effect of 
 the distinction may be traced in the variations of statement, 
 if not of doctrine, as to the final subjection of the Son, and 
 the nature of the kingdom that has " no end." And, lastly, 
 it may be observed to have its effect upon the entire system 
 of mediatorial worship, which in some Confessions is more 
 anxious to emphasize the coequal dignity and interchangeable 
 homage of the Three Persons, and in others lays great stress 
 on the unity of the object of worship through the mediation 
 of the Son, and under the influence of the Holy Spirit, while 
 a third ckss, in harmony with ancient catholic usage, thinks 
 to follow the Scripture precedent by uniting the two. 
 
 It may be said, generally, of most of the other great topics 
 made prominent in this work, that each might with advantage 
 be made the basis of a separate classification. Every system 
 and every Confession has its estimate, for instance, of Sin : it 
 would be more than a mere paradox to say that the dogma of 
 original sin stamps a character for good or evil upon every 
 type of Christian doctrine. The same may be said, with equal 
 but not with more propriety, of the redeeming work of Christ, 
 objective between heaven and earth, and subjective in the
 
 INTKODUCTION. xliii 
 
 human soul. So also Righteousness or justification, the doctrine 
 that presides in the Mediatorial Court of Christ, brings into 
 its own court every individual standard of faith that has ever 
 been set up. In this case, however, the table must needs, be 
 a long and elaborate one. For, whatever may be the variety 
 of opinion entertained as to the propriety of Luther's articulus 
 stantis vcl cadentis ecchsice, none will deny that it is a topic 
 literally all-pervading in theology. Every exhibition of the 
 truth of the gospel must have its clear deliverance on this 
 subject. But those deliverances, however clear in the general, 
 are sufficiently vague and indeterminate when the interior dis- 
 tinctions of the communities are introduced. Imputation, faith, 
 works, faith and works, active and passive obedience imputed, 
 formal and efficient cause, condition and instrument, are terms 
 that have a volume of meaning linked with each, and all of 
 them in turn cry from their respective Confessions for adjust- 
 ment. The task of arranging them is one that it is far easier 
 to recommend than to accomplish. But even here nothing is 
 impossible to the energy that loves its work. The dogma of 
 the Church also presents a fine nucleus for classification : in 
 the nature of things the dogma, like that which it defines, is 
 catholic, and all the tribes of theology must flow into it. None 
 is exempt ; for, though there are some systems that glory in 
 their emancipation from the word and the very idea, with all 
 its appendages, and profess to wish that it were exterminated 
 from the theological vocabulary, it will be found on close 
 scrutiny, if indeed any scrutiny is needed, that the great reality 
 is their very life. No communities are more churchly than 
 those which think they have unchurched themselves : witness 
 the close, compact, and orderly Body that calls Christian 
 brethren " Friends." 
 
 There is one topic that may be singled out for special 
 remark. It is that of the Person of Christ : a dogma, or 
 doctrine, that does not generally stand at the head of a theo- 
 logical department. Winer makes it one of his loci, and gives
 
 xliv INTRODUCTION. 
 
 it ample prominence ; but then he is careful to connect with 
 it the term " Divinity," as if the Person of Christ and His 
 Godhead were convertible terms. To do him justice, however, 
 the observations which he appends to the exhibition of the 
 authorities, shows that he included the true doctrine of Christ's 
 Person, as a subordinate branch of a subject over which it 
 should have presided as supreme. The Godhead of Christ is 
 a doctrine that belongs to the Trinity ; it belongs to His 
 Person only as pertaining to one of His two natures, which 
 in their indissoluble unity constitute His Person. In making 
 this doctrine the superscription of a distinct branch, the student 
 will have before him one of the finest subjects in theology. He 
 must not make haste ; but contemplate it long, reverently, and 
 loyally, before he begins. When he begins, he may take 
 Winer's comparative view to a certain extent ; but he will 
 soon have to desert his guide, or rather his guide will desert 
 him. He must go to the ancient symbols, and even higher 
 than that. They will show him what was the Catholic doc- 
 trine, as formulated by the first four Councils, against sundry 
 heresies that denied the verity of the human nature of Christ, 
 the absoluteness of His divine nature, the unity of His one 
 Person, and the distinction of His two natures. And, as his 
 table is not exactly a classification of heresies, but rather of 
 the doctrine of the Confessions on all sides, his task will be a 
 simple one down to the Eeformation. He will have to show 
 the unity of Christendom on this great subject, no solitary, 
 surviving symbol or Confession of Faith, bearing witness to any 
 doctrine on Christ's Person but one. He may tabulate if he 
 will, and as much as he pleases, the sporadic and speedily 
 obsolete opinions of men and of schools, from the Docetics 
 downwards ; but that is at his own discretion. After the Pie- 
 fonnatiou, the Socini and the Polonian Brethren will demand 
 to be heard. Their places must be found for them, and a place 
 also for their descendants, of every degree, who have greatly 
 varied their doctrine but never in the ascending scale, always
 
 INTRODUCTION. xlv 
 
 rather in the line of a sure descent. So far, however, all has 
 been general, and comparatively easy. The plain answer to 
 the plain question, " What think ye of Christ ? whose son is 
 He ? " or that other, " Whom say ye that I am ? " is frankly 
 given by the several Confessions, and cannot easily be mis- 
 taken. But the subject does not end there. Now conies its 
 difficulties, which are, if such a term may be admitted, its 
 fascinations. They search into all the nooks and corners of 
 this confessional temple, and try sharply the spirits of theo- 
 logical science. It will be sufficient here to indicate in what 
 direction those crucial tests and minor amenities of the doctrine 
 lie : as these remarks are not intended to do the work, but to 
 indicate how it is to be done. And, first, it must be shown 
 what specific dogmas of the old communions have tended to 
 mar or obscure a doctrine otherwise correctly held. It is not 
 doing justice to the subject to say that Christendom was 
 united upon the confession of the Person of' Christ at the 
 time of the Reformation. Protestant theologians would demur 
 to this statement as such, and unqualified : Romanist delin- 
 quencies, running over so wide a range of vital topics, would 
 scarcely leave this, the most vital of all, untouched. It 
 will be necessary, then, to show how what may be called the 
 application of the doctrine has suffered in the hand of Greek 
 and Eomish theology : the latter especially, but noting the 
 difference in this respect between the two. What effect upon 
 the humanity of our Lord in His one Person has the dogma 
 of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin, which makes 
 Him in His human nature no longer the solitary sinless 
 representative of mankind ? What influence is exerted upon 
 it by the dogma of the Mediatorship confined to the Man- 
 hood, always supposing that, in the indivisible as well as 
 undivided Person, there could be no merely human agent ? 
 What cross-lights, or rather shadows, are thrown upon it by 
 the dogma of Transubstantiation : not only as impairing its 
 dignity, but as seeming to transfer the office of the Holy
 
 xM INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Spirit, the mediator between the Person of Christ and our 
 persons, to a Sacrament which gives the whole Christ to man, 
 directly, and in another form, and through a priestly mediator ? 
 These are questions to be profoundly studied, and their answer 
 will greatly enrich the tabular view. 
 
 But the doctrine carries its inquisition into the Protestant 
 as well as the Romanist standards, and becomes the watch- 
 word of some strange varieties of discussion. It will be 
 necessary to show how Lutheran theology stands in relation 
 to it. That relation is in some respects peculiar; unshared 
 by any other Confession in Christendom.- Consubstantiation, 
 however widely different from Transubstantiation in some 
 most fundamental respects, is akin in its influence upon the 
 doctrine of the Person in relation to the Holy Ghost. But 
 the specialty of this theory of the Eucharist is that it limits 
 the impartation of Christ in the Sacrament to His human 
 nature, or His glorified corporeity, which is communicated to 
 the recipient in and with and under the elements. This is, in 
 a certain sense, a division of the one Person of the Piedeemer. 
 But the doctrine is perhaps saved from such an imputation by 
 another kindred dogma, that of the communicatio idiomatv.m, 
 or the communication of" the properties of the Divine nature 
 to the human. Thus the manhood of the Saviour has all the 
 virtue of His divinity, and can be imparted from a thousand 
 altars. To show the bearing of this upon the Lutheran sacra- 
 mental theology, and indeed upon the entire economy of union 
 with Christ in its system, will be a necessary task, as well as 
 to indicate the marked difference between it and the Reformed 
 theology in general, with the mediation scheme of Calvin. The 
 doctrine must also be traced in another and widely different 
 range : that, namely, which opens to our view the theories 
 of our Lord's exinanition, or the measure and laws of His 
 humiliation in the assumption of human nature. Though the 
 questions arising out of this subject are not precisely confes- 
 sional questions, belonging rather to the minor controversies,
 
 INTRODUCTION. xlvii 
 
 they are more and more active in their influence on Lutheran 
 theology, and must have a place in its department of the 
 tabular view. Nor must it be omitted that the doctrine of 
 Christ's Person is closely connected with the nature of that 
 obedience which He wrought out as one agent, not man only, 
 though representing man, not God only, though the manifesta- 
 tion of God, but the Incarnate Son, the unity of whose Person 
 raises Him absolutely above the law to which He voluntarily 
 submitted. But there lies the question in discussion; and 
 fairly to discuss it requires a careful study of the doctrine 
 now before us. In fact, it is scarcely possible to limit the 
 application of this subject. No topics in theology more aptly 
 represent the central truth. For, from the absolute and the 
 economical Trinity down to the judgment and the final con- 
 summation, the true idea of Christ's Person has in all things 
 the pie-eminence. The student who shall achieve well, or 
 fairly well, this individual table, will have learnt more by 
 the process than many a goodly volume on the divinity of 
 Christ could teach him. 
 
 Once more, the Holy Spirit, as the centre of a dogmatic 
 system, might advantageously command another line in such 
 tables as these. The place assigned to the Third Person in 
 the economical Trinity in the several Confessions, defines their 
 character with almost as much precision as that of Christ's 
 Person. Here would recur, of course, the question of the Filioque, 
 which divides East from West, and has already been viewed 
 under the doctrine of the immanent Trinity. But now it 
 would introduce the bearing of the double procession upon 
 the theology of redemption. For, if Father and Son are 
 names belonging to the God of the mediatorial economy, and 
 the Holy Ghost proceeds from both, then we gain an important 
 basis for a double doctrine of the Spirit's relation to the 
 Mediator. In the one He is sent from the Father through 
 the Son's intercession to discharge a distinct function, to be 
 the administrator of redemption generally, to fill up as it were
 
 xlviii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 the measure of Christ's Work, and act upon earth in the place 
 of Him whom the heavens have received. In the other, He 
 is the Spirit proceeding from Christ Himself, whose presence 
 is the presence of our very Lord. " The Lord is that Spirit," 
 whose indwelling fulfils all that the Scripture says in its 
 profoundest passages concerning the mystical union of Christ's 
 Person with believers. The former view, unqualified by the 
 latter, lays the foundation of a superstructure in which the 
 Saviour and the Holy Ghost are often too much separated : 
 the actual miraculous presence of Christ being the result of 
 a perpetual miracle, the continuation of His work in the 
 Church; and the office of the Comforter being limited to the 
 particular functions of enlightenment and sanctification. The 
 latter view allows of no Christ in the mediatorial economy 
 who is to be regarded as apart from the Spirit, who proceedeth 
 from the Son as well as from the Father, and is therefore 
 what the Lord has termed Him, His other Self within the 
 Christian Church. It is the union of these two counterpart 
 ideas that gives the perfect doctrine of the Holy Ghost as a 
 centre in theology. But the doctrine does not end there. 
 That is only its beginning. The Spirit's work in the world is 
 as -all-pervasive as that of the Son. Every theological system 
 has its distinct relation to it ; and no two assign precisely the 
 same function to Him whose ministration the gospel is. It 
 will be a difficult but valuable exercise to determine the 
 posture of all the Confessions to the Holy Ghost as in- 
 spirer and witness of the Scriptures, as bearing testimony to 
 believers and working within them. It is under this head 
 that some of the distinguishing characteristics both of Koman- 
 ism and of Arminianism would best be exhibited. In the 
 former system the Holy Ghost was in the original constitution 
 of man a kind of mediator before the Mediator: being the 
 bond of perfection in man's first estate, the superadded gift of 
 original righteousness, whose departure was the fatal fall, and 
 His restoration in baptism the free gift that restores mankind.
 
 INTRODUCTION. xlix 
 
 Arminianism has no more imposing doctrine than that which 
 it teaches concerning the Spirit's universal influence as the 
 representative of Christ's redemption, pervading the outer 
 court with that preliminary grace which leads to the Holy 
 and the Holiest. These are but specimens, serving to show in 
 what way the Third Person might occupy a place as central 
 as Christ Himself in the exhibition of Christian doctrine. 
 Before leaving the topic, the observation may be allowed, in 
 the way of marginal note only, that there is no one subject 
 in Christian theology more neglected than this. Let our 
 imaginary student take care not to neglect it. 
 
 Yet one more subject shall detain us for a while. It is 
 at first sight somewhat remarkable that Winer has not in- 
 cluded Eschatology, or the Doctrines of the Last Things, in 
 his tabulation. But, when we consider attentively, we find 
 that the symbolical interest of these subjects is exhausted by 
 the section on the doctrine or sacrament of Penance. This is 
 one of many instances in which the place occupied by a 
 subject in the old Confessions is far from being the measure 
 of its absolute importance. The Comparative Tables now 
 recommended must have a department for the Last Things, 
 and give it plenty of space. Tor it is a vast as well as an 
 awful branch of theology, and, though scarcely mentioned at 
 any length in our volume, occupies in some form or other the 
 anxious thought of every Church in Christendom. In filling 
 up the table, our student will have to introduce a great number 
 of theories, more or less fanciful and speculative, which 
 glimmer in some of the Confessions, for instance, on the 
 subject of the Resurrection, and the circumstantials of the 
 consummation of all things. There is one branch the Inter- 
 mediate State in which the Eomanist and Greek, the Lutheran 
 and the Reformed, will all be found in their Confessions more 
 or less to differ. The differences are easily stated, but they 
 are enormous in their bearing upon theology. The Advent of 
 Christ is another subject which enters little into the Creeds 
 
 d
 
 1 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 and Confessions, save in connection with the Judgment ; but 
 there is a world of unwritten Creeds on the subject of the 
 Millennium which must be epitomized, if justice is to be done 
 to the table. And finally the Judgment, with its eternal issues, 
 must enter. Here again it is remarkable that the Creeds and 
 Confessions of Christendom, whether ancient or modern, have 
 little to say, simply because they were generally constructed 
 more or less with reference to the suppression of error, and 
 there has been a most solemn unanimity among the Christian 
 communities on this subject from the beginning. 
 
 It will strike the reader's mind, and possibly take the 
 form of an objection, that this enlarged series of comparative 
 tables must needs involve a constant repetition of the leading 
 topics of theology. That, indeed, is the characteristic difference 
 between such a synoptical view as is here proposed and that 
 which is given in this volume. But the very repetition, that 
 might on a first glance seem wearisome or distracting, will on 
 deeper consideration approve itself to be a peculiar and great 
 advantage. It would be hard to exaggerate the importance 
 of that kind of theological study which makes every cardinal 
 topic in its turn a centre, and brings all other themes to revolve 
 around it. Thus, and thus only, we see the various bearings 
 and relations of every subject, and come to understand it 
 thoroughly. Indeed, it is not possible in any other way to do 
 justice to some of the leading doctrines. The Person of Christ 
 cannot be studied under the dogma of the Trinity, though it 
 must necessarily enter there so far as concerns the Divine 
 nature. On the other hand, the doctrine of the Trinity, both 
 as immanent and as economical, must recur under the dogma 
 of the Person of Christ, but in such a way as to avoid the 
 semblance of repetition. It is impossible to do justice to the 
 doctrine of the Holy Ghost as an isolated subject ; it must run 
 more or less through all theology. So is it with the Atone- 
 ment, which, however clear it may be made in itself, is made 
 much more clear when it returns in the doctrine of justifi-
 
 INTRODUCTION. li 
 
 cation. In fact there is nothing that the student of a book 
 like this should have more diligently impressed upon his 
 mind, than the necessity of not studying the several sub- 
 jects of theological science in an isolated manner. This is 
 the manifest evil connected with most of the systems that 
 are commonly adopted. Topic after topic from Eevelation to 
 Judgment is introduced, discussed, and despatched, often with 
 a special care that it shall return no more. It was not after 
 this manner that the Christian Church was taught the rudi- 
 ments of its theology in the New Testament ; and on such a 
 principle the truth can never be adequately unfolded in the 
 scientific theology of the Christian Church. What is to be 
 desired and recommended as the perfection of divinity, is 
 that in which the freedom of Biblical theology is preserved 
 and harmonized with the results of systematizing art. The 
 bearings of every doctrine on every other doctrine should be 
 indicated at least : that being briefly and subordinately touched 
 upon under one head, which takes the leading place under 
 another. Now the same observation will apply to the task now 
 recommended. Our Table is not an exhibition of systematic 
 theology, but of the relation of every Creed to its leading 
 doctrines. But the result, if it is skilfully done, will be as 
 good as any system of theology. It remains only that the 
 student make the experiment : commencing on a small scale, 
 enlarging it as he goes on. Let him insert at first the judg- 
 ments of every Confession on the fundamental subjects, much 
 after the manner of Winer, but in his own words. If his 
 tables are in a worthy volume, well articulated, and with 
 ample room for fuller detail of minor differences, for dates and 
 names and all the other accessories of his subject, the accumu- 
 lation of a few years will be more valuable to him than any 
 book an his library. 
 
 III. Hitherto these introductory observations have gone on 
 the supposition that Winer's work is a calm, impartial, com-
 
 lii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 prehensive, and universal view of the Confessions of Christen- 
 dom ; and that as such it may be made a text-book by the 
 theologian of every doctrinal type. It is time now to specify 
 certain necessary qualifications of this tribute : qualifications, 
 however, which point only to the kind of supplement which 
 his work requires for the English reader, and for the English 
 reader of the present day. This has no reference to the mere 
 literature of the question. The last German editor of the 
 work has supplied all that could be desired in this depart- 
 ment ; and the student who desires to possess the amplest 
 materials for the prosecution of his researches in Symbolical 
 Theology, will find the latest and best collections of the several 
 Creeds of the Churches indicated for his benefit. A judicious 
 selection of these would be a valuable addition to his library, 
 and give him a firm foundation on which to build. In fact, so 
 complete and well digested are these summaries and collec- 
 tions, that no man need quote at second hand the statements 
 of either the ancient or the modern Confessions of Christian 
 Faith ; and, as truth should reign in every department of 
 theology, so accuracy in literary quotation should be its 
 faithful minister. But neither truth in the thing expressed, 
 nor accuracy in the expression of it, can long be maintained 
 in this branch of study unless the habit is formed of examin- 
 ing, wherever that is possible, the original standards as they 
 speak for themselves. 
 
 Whatever supplement the work may require has reference 
 rather to its presentation for English readers. And this in two 
 directions. First, the Continental systems of theology are by 
 the necessity of the case looked at from a German point of 
 view, and, when the point of view is transferred to this side of 
 the Channel, though the geographical change is not great, the 
 theological parallax is considerable, bearing no precise propor- 
 tion to the distance in space. Secondly, to the English eye of 
 the present day there are many and most important varieties 
 of Confession which, whether formulated or not, ought to be
 
 INTRODUCTION. lili 
 
 admitted into the survey, but have no place in Winer's tabu- 
 lation. It may be suggested that this was a fair reason for an 
 editorial reconstruction of the work itself; or for running dis- 
 sertations adapting the foreign element to the English standard 
 of comparison, and such insertions of our more modern repre- 
 sentatives of belief as would have made the book complete. 
 As to the first suggestion, he who would offer it has never 
 made the experiment of recasting the work of a great man, and 
 yet preserving its identity ; and he must have failed to notice 
 how miserably such processes have generally issued. There is 
 no extant illustration of its success ; at least of such complete 
 or even partial success as would encourage any sound-minded 
 editor to the attempt. As to the third suggestion, that of 
 adding the later Confessions, the question must first be 
 answered, Where are they to be found ? Most of our modern 
 communities have declined to formulate their peculiarities by 
 express articles, at any rate by any such precise form of sound 
 words as might be appealed to as declaring their common sen- 
 timent. It is far easier to understand the general type of 
 Congregationalist or Baptist or Methodist doctrine than to 
 quote the terms in which they have agreed to define it. So 
 also it is much easier to summarize in the mind than to exhibit 
 on paper the congeries of beliefs, positive and negative, that 
 make up the religion of Millenarians, Unitarians, Friends, 
 Swedenborgians, Irvingites, and others, too many to be enu- 
 merated. Some of these bodies fall back upon old standards, 
 such as the Thirty-nine Articles and the Westminster Confes- 
 sion. So far as that holds good, their case is met. The defi- 
 nitions of the Anglican Church have been given by Winer 
 himself, and he has done mpre than justice to the question ; 
 the testimonies of the Westminster Confession have been care- 
 fully given in this English edition, in justice to that very 
 large portion of the Christian world which owes it allegiance 
 more or less absolute. The third suggestion remains, the 
 running dissertations ; and that is provided for in what
 
 liv INTRODUCTION. 
 
 remains of this Introduction, so far as such fleeting notices as 
 the following may deserve the name of dissertation. 
 
 First, as to the two great types of Protestant doctrine, the 
 Lutheran and the Reformed, it may not be a superfluous 
 task to make a few remarks that shall round them off to the 
 English student in their united and several significance. It 
 would be a work of supererogation to indicate their doctrinal 
 distinction, from Home on the one hand, and, on the other 
 hand, as sharply defined between themselves. That is done 
 effectually in the volume, and need not be twice done. But a 
 German author would take some things for granted which an 
 English reader would need to have explained to him. 
 
 These two systems of Christian doctrine in the German 
 theory rule the Protestant world. As such they are not 
 Lutheranism and Calvinism, but, dropping the names of men, 
 they are the Evangelical and the Reformed Confessions. 
 Lutheranism is the Evangelical Church : having adopted that 
 term for its theology, not as against its Swiss coadjutor in the 
 Reformation, but as against Rome, and as the symbol of its 
 protest for the pure gospel The Swiss or Calvinistic move- 
 ment, as nearly as possible simultaneous, produced the Reformed 
 Confession : having adopted that term Reformed for its theo- 
 logy, not as against its German coadjutor, of course, but still 
 as against Rome, and as the symbol of its protest against the 
 Papal Church. It would perhaps be hypercriticism to say that 
 the two terms obscurely indicate a certain difference between 
 the two systems, as the former was more concerned with 
 Christian doctrine, the latter more concerned with the Christian 
 State, while they in some sense alike contended for both. 
 There is a truth in this which might be pleaded for, were it 
 worth while. But let it pass : the distinction is one that has 
 not so much significance among us as it has in German theology, 
 but it is one that requires to be understood : we must be 
 familiar with many things in our neighbours' nomenclature 
 which we do not ourselves adopt. Returning to the starting-
 
 INTEODUCTION. ly 
 
 point, the German survey of the Christian world makes the 
 Evangelical and Keformed types govern all Protestant theology. 
 To change the figure, the river that went out of the new Eden 
 to water the garden was parted and became two streams to 
 fertilize the entire theological earth. To drop figures alto- 
 gether, Lutheranism as a form of Christianity is held by the 
 German heart of Europe, by the Scandinavian nations, by part 
 of Britain and America, reckoning itself the standard and 
 director of an immense body of science theological that bears 
 not its name ; whilst the Eeformed form of Christianity is held 
 by Switzerland and France, its ancient seats, by the Nether- 
 lands, by much of Great Britain Scotland particularly, but 
 not exclusively, and by the greater part of North America. 
 Whatever Christian symbols bear not the signature of the 
 Augsburg Confession have that of the Helvetic ; in other words, 
 those have written broadly upon them the name of Luther, 
 these the name of Calvin. Hence the arrangement of the Con- 
 fessions in the present volume. The English Articles and the 
 Westminster Confession drop quietly into the ranks of the 
 Eeformed. Evangelical and Eeformed are the two central 
 superscriptions made one in the unity of Protestant doctrine. 
 To the left lie the corrupt Confessions of East and West ; and 
 to the right, in a confraternity forced upon them rather by 
 science than truth, the Arminian, Anabaptist, and Socinian 
 forms of faith. This style of German unification has not been 
 interfered with in our edition. 
 
 It has at the first glance some measure of justification in 
 the facts of the case, especially as regards the Eeformed type 
 of Confession. This has been stamped, with some modifications, 
 on a larger number of Christian formularies. The die was 
 new cut, and its edges keenly sharpened at the Synod of Dort; 
 it took a completer form and was engraved afresh in good 
 English letters in the Westminster Confession, and that Con- 
 fession is an elect symbol of Calvinistic Presbyterianism all 
 over the world, as well as of most congregational communities
 
 Ivi INTRODUCTION. 
 
 in England and America. Moreover, the Anglican formularies 
 were constructed very much under the influence of the Augs- 
 burg and the Swiss Confessions: being in many respects a 
 composite of the two, deriving, when the articles, canons, and 
 rites of the English Church are viewed as a whole, a peculiar 
 and unshared character from the combination. He who reads 
 the doctrinal standards is constantly reminded of Calvin; he 
 who follows its liturgical service feels that he is much more 
 under the influence of a sacramental religion than Calvin ever 
 was. But, on the other hand, there is much to be set against 
 all this. It is not true that Luther and Calvin moulded the 
 Eeformation so absolutely. In our own land, Christian theo- 
 logy had been before their time undergoing its silent but sure 
 transformation. There lived brave men before Agamemnon : 
 there were true interpreters of God's Word in England and 
 Scotland who did more for subsequent Christian truth than any 
 of the Confessions of Germany and Switzerland. Moreover, the 
 doctrinal system of the English Churches varies in many 
 things from the Continental type ; and varies in a way which 
 absolutely proves it independent of both the forms of that 
 type. The dogma of Transubstantiation has never had a 
 formula that expresses it in the English language ; the 
 Anglican Real Presence is more nearly allied to Calvin's 
 doctrine, though essentially diverging from that. The theo- 
 logy of the Puritans, however much like that of Calvin, held 
 very different theories as to the relation of Christianity to the 
 State, and the authority of man in things divine. And, if we 
 come down to our own times, it cannot be said that the great 
 bulk of English theology is under the influence of either 
 Luther or Calvin. In all its branches it is independent of 
 Continental Confessions, however much in all its branches in- 
 debted to Continental learning and criticism. 
 
 Passing from that subject which, however, will presently 
 be resumed the internal relations of Lutheranism and the Re- 
 formed demand a moment's attention. A careful study of their
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ivii 
 
 documents will show how widely they diverge on many funda- 
 mental points: so widely, that the experiment of their union in 
 Germany, now nearly half a century made, can never hope to 
 be a complete success. It may be wrong to say fundamental 
 points, for the two Confessions are perfectly at one as to the 
 deepest basis of human hope. But as to the universality of 
 the grace of the gospel, and the means of grace by which it is 
 applied, and the sacramental participation of Christ, they are 
 very widely separated. The absolute sovereignty of God 
 over man's will and destiny, declared in the doctrine of 
 Election, sways with a dread supremacy the Reformed Con- 
 fessions; the Lutheran allow free play for human responsibility 
 and a predestination based upon the foresight of faith and 
 obedience. In the Reformed Confessions the means of grace 
 are reduced finally to the Word of God ; in the Lutheran 
 they really become the sacraments alone: for, in the former, the 
 emphasis is laid upon the living word, which makes all other 
 means what they are; while, in the latter, grace is in its strict- 
 est meaning the justification, quickening, and sanctification of 
 the soul, which are imparted in the order of the gospel only 
 through the two sacraments. It is, however, in the nature of 
 eucharistical communion with Christ that the two Confessions 
 betray the widest difference. In the Reformed the Lord's 
 Supper is the sign and pledge of a union with Christ which is 
 produced independently by the Spirit through faith. In the 
 Lutheran, the glorified corporeity of Christ, His real body and 
 blood, are in verity and deed received by all who partake : to 
 their salvation by the worthy, to their condemnation by the 
 unworthy. It is only right to add on this subject, that, while 
 the Lutheran doctrine has remained almost unvaried from the 
 beginning taking its stand with desperate tenacity on the 
 words, This is my Body! the Reformed has known many 
 varieties of statement. Calvin, for instance, who denied the 
 ubiquity of the Saviour's body, and therefore rejected the idea 
 of its impartation in and under and with the elements to all
 
 Iviii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 who received them, nevertheless held firmly that the very 
 body of Christ is the spiritual sustenance of the soul, which 
 ascends to touch it as it were in heaven hy faith. Zwingli 
 fixed his eye solely on the symbol and sign in the sacrament : 
 at least that is the prevalent tendency of his teaching, the 
 language of which varies considerably. The representatives of 
 the Eeformed Confessions in England have, as has been already 
 affirmed, maintained their independence. The Presbyterian 
 type of doctrine in the Westminster Confession gives much 
 prominence to the sealing efficacy of the Lord's Supper, as an 
 instrument that not only pledges but conveys over the 
 blessings of which it is the sign, the benefits, that is, of 
 the Christian covenant. From this the Congregationalist 
 standards recede, and go beyond Zwiugli in the opposite 
 direction. But we are trespassing into a region where our 
 volume itself is the best guide. 
 
 Before leaving these venerable Confessions, or rather 
 families of Confessions, a word may be said as to their 
 influence upon the theologies which they severally regulated. 
 At the outset they each gave birth to as noble a series of dog- 
 matic writers as Christian literature has ever known: as subtle 
 as the schoolmen, whose methods they inherited, but baptized 
 richly with the spirit of the new evangelical doctrine. The 
 enumeration of their names in both communions would 
 literally fill more than one of these pages : of divines, that is, 
 who wrote on Systematic Theology, whose works were not 
 practical or controversial treatises so much as bodies of 
 divinity, constructed on the most comprehensive system, 
 arranged with consummate analytical art, and still held in 
 repute as the standard of Orthodoxy. These are the treasures 
 of Lutheran and Eeformed Theology, bequeathed to it by the 
 first century after the Eeformation. But here we are en- 
 countered by the objection, that this immense phalanx of 
 divines failed to defend Germany and Switzerland and 
 Holland from the irruption of Eationalism, and Transcen-
 
 INTRODUCTION. lix 
 
 dental Philosophy, and Confessional indifference and lawless- 
 ness. It is hard to meet that objection. The fact must be 
 left among those mysteries of Divine Providence which are 
 the common burden, and which happily we are not required to 
 solve. But we may demur to the inference drawn from the 
 fact in disparagement of these Confessions themselves, and of 
 Confessions generally. Granted that neither of the two 
 great Reformation Standards has preserved its community 
 from error that Germany and Holland, their headquarters in 
 the present day, have a large number of destructionist critics 
 in their midst that is no argument against the value of the 
 formularies against which these critics have revolted. The vital 
 essential truth that is common to them all has preserved them 
 to this day : the errors they contain for, being in some things 
 contradictory, errors they must hold, each or both may be to 
 a great extent chargeable with the recoil into Eationalism. 
 
 An intelligent, not to say charitable, estimate of the present 
 influence of the two great families of Confessions on Conti- 
 nental Theology will discover much to plead in their favour. 
 First, it cannot be denied that they have never failed from the 
 beginning to keep their place as the two centres of a Christian 
 literature generally sound. This holds good of both. A stream 
 of rich, fresh, edifying German theology may be traced flowing 
 steadily within its more or less definite banks from Melanch- 
 thon to the present day. A censorious observer may point to 
 periods when those banks were effaced, and the healthy and 
 impure waters flowed indistinguishably through one turbid 
 mass : the more catholic-minded observer will see it far other- 
 wise. The same may be said of the Eeformed Theology, 
 especially if its tributaries in Holland and England and 
 America are taken into account. Again, it is no slight 
 evidence of the inherent vigour of these Confessions that they 
 are rallying around them many of the ablest thinkers and 
 writers of the age. These are so earnest in their allegiance 
 that they are beginning to receive a common name from their
 
 Ix INTRODUCTION*. 
 
 confessional ardour. Some of them are rigorous and almost 
 bigoted in their adherence to their respective formularies, 
 emulating the old dogmatic divines in the systematic presen- 
 tation of Lutheran and Reformed Theology, as reconstructed in 
 the presence of Rationalism and with a constant reference to 
 its attacks. Some of them base their labours on the theory 
 of a union of the Confessions. These Union theologians are 
 rapidly increasing. They labour, of course, under great dis- 
 advantages. It cannot be denied that the original framers of 
 the Confessions finished their work in such a manner that the 
 types can never coalesce, the two theologies can never run 
 into the same mould. This does not, however, preclude the 
 possibility that the resulting system may be one better on the 
 whole than any which either Confession could produce alone : 
 a question, however, which this is not the place to enter upon. 
 The union of the two Churches, begun at the Tercentenary of 
 the Reformation, and gradually spreading through Germany 
 down to the present time, is, after half a century, only an 
 experiment. 
 
 In our own day Protestant Europe is witnessing a new and 
 strange kind of controversy, waged furiously on the Continent, 
 but more or less involving Great Britain. There is, to use a 
 bold word, a contest between the modern Confessions and the 
 ancient symbols, or rather the one ancient symbol from which 
 the others sprang the Apostles' Creed. The German Protestant 
 Alliance for by such a term we must translate its paradoxical 
 name in the original is waging a steady and relentless war 
 against the Reformation symbols, and uses for convenience the 
 earliest Christian rule of faith as its standard and battery. 
 As the campaign goes on, and its tactics and evolutions become 
 more evident, it begins to appear that the old symbol has 
 been, after all, deceitfully used. The contest is really the old 
 one between a human and a divine Christianity under another 
 form. The question soon arose, What is the symbolum apos- 
 tolicum ? One by one it lost its articles, until it was disin-
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixi 
 
 tegrated into a meaningless symbol of an original legendary 
 faith. But the gradual accumulation of the articles of that 
 Creed was step by step a series of victories over the heresies 
 of early times ; and now it remains that, article by article, it 
 must be defended in these later ages. Lutheranism has to 
 fight resolutely now for the veriest foundation facts of the 
 Christian faith ; and it is no small evidence of the value of 
 its old Confessions that the ablest defenders of the early faith 
 are also the most strenuous adherents of their own modern 
 form of it. 
 
 But Protestant Christendom was not long divided between 
 the two Confessions in their integrity. Other systems of faith 
 have arisen, and exerted vast influence. A few words will be 
 necessary in explanation of the place assigned in this work to 
 Arminian doctrine, as the first and most important of these. 
 The idea suggested to the English mind by the term Armi- 
 nianism is not precisely the same as that which it suggests to 
 the German divine. To us it is simply the antithesis of Cal- 
 vinism, and stands rather for a tendency of thought than for a 
 definite Confession. To the German, and to the Continental 
 student of historical theology generally, it stands for a Dutch 
 religious community with a dogmatic standard and a developed 
 history not yet ended. 
 
 The Arminian or Eemonstrant divinity has always had a 
 sore ordeal to pass through. To the Lutherans it has been a 
 degenerate branch of the Eeformed, and to the Keformed an 
 unworthy offshoot which it would fain disavow. It is not 
 necessary here to trace its history, nor to characterize its 
 leading theologians, for both these have justice done them in 
 the volume. Suffice that the names of Arminius, Episcopius, 
 Curcellseus, Hugo Grotius, Limborch, Le Clerc, and Wetstein 
 are a septemvirate not easily to be paralleled. But the taint 
 of latitudinarianism is upon the later Eemonstrant theology, 
 to the susceptibilities at least of the more orthodox Lutherans 
 and Eeformed. It is almost universally thought that the
 
 Ixii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 older quinquarticular Arminianism betrayed a tendency towards 
 laxity in doctrine almost as soon as the Remonstrant stage of 
 its history was entered upon. Episcopius had to defend his 
 party against the charge of Socinianism : an easier task than 
 to defend it against the imputation of carrying too far the 
 subordination in the Trinity. It has been an offence to 
 the Confessional divines that the Arminians have been lax 
 as it regards symbols. The Calvinistic controversialists, in 
 particular, have never forgiven them their consistently -held 
 dogma concerning the human will, and have freely given them 
 the name of semi-Pelagians. Thus, on all hands, the Arminian 
 theology has been, and still is, where it lingers in the Nether- 
 lands, condemned : where it escapes one enemy, it falls under 
 the censure of another. To the strict adherent of the symbols, 
 it is Eationalism ; to the hyper-orthodox, it is semi-Socinianism; 
 to the rest, it is semi-popish Pelagianism. All this is here 
 stated as matter of fact. It is a necessary explanation of the 
 circumstance that the Arminian and the Socinian standards 
 are in such suspicious juxtaposition. The student must 
 bear in mind that Winer only falls in with the conven- 
 tional manner of speaking and principle of classification. A 
 careful examination of the authorities cited will suffice to 
 exhibit the truth as it respects an important body of theolo- 
 gical teachers and ' doctrines which have exerted no slight 
 influence on the Christianity of the world. 
 
 But there is an Arminianism in this country which is a 
 very different matter, and must be regarded under other lights. 
 It is its peculiarity that it has one history on the Continent 
 and another in England or among the English-speaking races. 
 Whereas in most Continental reviews of historical theology 
 Arminianism is regarded as a suspicious transitional stage 
 between Orthodoxy and nationalism, and its evil communi- 
 cations with Socinianism are supposed to have corrupted its 
 good morals, in the English estimate Arminianism is mainly 
 regarded as the diffused corrective of Calvinism. It represents
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixiii 
 
 a doctrine of the Atonement, whether objective in the finished 
 work of Christ or subjective in the personal application of that 
 work, which opposes the doctrine held by the Calvinistic 
 Reformed communities everywhere. The satisfaction of Christ 
 is viewed rather as offered to the righteous Governor of the 
 universe, and counted by Him sufficient for the relief of 
 the world from the sentence of the law, than as a strict 
 equivalent for the guilt of the elect, and imputed to them as 
 such. And the application of Christ's merit is regarded as an 
 appropriation on the part of man through the Spirit's grace, 
 leaving it as the issue of his probation to hold it fast for ever 
 or lose it, rather than as the absolute and irreversible interest 
 in salvation secured by Christ for His own. This is English 
 Arminianism, as it reigns in a very large section of the 
 Anglican divinity, more ancient and more modern, and as it has 
 been accepted throughout the wide-spread Methodist denomina- 
 'tions. It may be said, indeed, that Arminianism in England 
 further represents a doctrine of the Trinity and the Person of 
 Christ which has its peculiarities. But an accurate theological 
 criticism will not allow this. The subordination in the interior 
 relations of the triune nature, which, as a subordination that does 
 not impair the essential equality and consubstantiality of the 
 Divine Persons, was taught by Pearson, for instance, the re- 
 presentative of a large body of divines, was not derived from 
 Arminianism. It descended to these writers from the earliest 
 theology of the Church, and is supported by them by Scripture 
 and the fathers. It is true that the doctrine luminously 
 reigns in the writings of the second generation of Dutch 
 Arminianism, but Anglican divinity was no borrower from the 
 Continent in this department. Nor was it, strictly speaking, 
 in the other ; that is, in the doctrines of Grace. Neither the 
 older divines of the English Church, nor the modern Method- 
 ists, thought themselves to have received what they taught on 
 these questions, either "from man or by man." But un- 
 doubtedly the reflex and indirect influence of the Synod of
 
 Ixiv INTRODUCTION. 
 
 Dort was very great in this country. For a long time 
 Arminianism was a watchword as against Calvinism. This, 
 however, gradually ceased to be an acknowledged watchword ; 
 it was suppressed in the Methodist literature, and is not used 
 save by the Calvinistic opponents of the doctrines referred 
 to. For the rest, and to sum up these merely historical 
 remarks, it must be remembered by the English student 
 of this work, that while Arminians, or rather Eemonstrants, 
 have never ceased to be a corporate body in the Eeformed 
 Netherlands, Arminianism in England has never been more 
 than a tendency and an influence, a theory and norm of doc- 
 trine, and consequently without a Confession of its own. 
 
 Strictly speaking, Arminianism has not, either on the 
 Continent or in England, had a Confession. One of the 
 characteristic principles of the party was a comparative in- 
 difference to formal symbols and creeds. But this fact must 
 be rightly understood ; the Remonstrant divines were never lax 
 either in the systematization or the definition of their faith. 
 Their dogmatic writers were quite worthy to take rank with 
 their rivals in these respects, and that is no small praise. 
 Nothing can be more luminous than the exposition of doctrine 
 by Episcopius and Limborch. And it cannot be denied that 
 their entire theory of Christianity from end to end is articu- 
 lated, uniform and consistent ; it would not otherwise have 
 lodged so firmly in the Anglo-Saxon mind. But the leaders 
 of this movement were not ambitious to form a distinct 
 community ; they were content to protest against what they 
 thought exaggerations in the Confessions which they in the 
 main agreed with and adopted. Arminians they never called 
 themselves ; and their name Eemonstrants was derived from 
 their honourable but firm remonstrance presented to the States- 
 General of Holland in 1611. Arminius was originally a 
 disciple of Beza, and through him of Calvin. He never ceased 
 to respect the Eeformed Confessions; and never, any more 
 than his successors, set up a rival formulary. He was con-
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixv 
 
 tent, so far as concerned that, with establishing negations of 
 some of what he thought the too severe statements of the 
 doctrines of Grace. It must be added to this, that the com- 
 munity carried to an excess their estimate of the greater im- 
 portance of a sound life in comparison with a sound Creed ; 
 forgetting, in later times especially, that, if doctrine is accord- 
 ing to godliness, godliness is also according to doctrine. Hence, 
 on the whole, it may be said that the Eemonstrant community 
 abjured the thought of any such separation from the Eeformed 
 communion as would have been involved in the construction 
 of a distinct Creed. 
 
 On the other hand, there are certain Arminian documents 
 which have all the force and authority of a Confession. For 
 the character and history of these the reader is referred to 
 Winer. They have reference to the five points in particular 
 that defined the differences between the old and the new types 
 of doctrine. The other standards are appealed to as containing 
 the more general exposition of doctrine. And the whole may 
 be said to be the most remarkable instance Christianity 
 has known of an eclectic faith. This term is a branded one ; 
 and as such will be very welcome to those who are the over- 
 zealous enemies of Arminianism. But it is used here in an 
 historical and conventional sense of our own, to meet the facts 
 of the case. It absorbs the greater part of the doctrines of 
 the Lutheran and Eeformed standards, using honestly the 
 terms satisfaction, original sin, effectual grace, but throwing 
 over them the influence of a doctrine concerning the universal 
 effect of the redeeming work of Christ which gives each of 
 them a distinct and qualified character : to reconcile them with 
 vain reasoning, their enemies say ; to reconcile them with 
 Scripture and the facts of human consciousness, they say them- 
 selves. In this they are eclectic enough to borrow from later 
 Lutheranism, the early Greek Churches, and in some sense the 
 later doctrine of Eome. Semi-Pelagianism, both Eoman and 
 Greek, might seem to have lent them some of its few unex- 
 
 6
 
 Ixvi INTRODUCTION. 
 
 ceptionable principles as to the freedom of the human will. 
 But they contracted no further debt to that system, as the 
 Eemonstrants have never denied that the first as well as all sub- 
 sequent movements of the soul towards God are of the operation 
 of the Holy Ghost. To go a step further back: there may 
 appear to be a strain of the Eomanist doctrine in the Arminian 
 view of the effects of the fall. But in the latter, the restora- 
 tion of the Spirit to man through Christ's mediation is made a 
 general gift to the race; in the former, the Sacrament of 
 Baptism removes every trace of original sin as such. This line 
 of observation might easily be pursued ; but enough has been 
 said for our merely historical object. Justice would not have 
 been done to the Arminian section of our comparative view 
 without so much: more would carry us beyond our present 
 design. Let it suffice, that the eclecticism of the Eemonstrant 
 divinity must indicate its character in the following work, 
 which will show that the importation of the older theology 
 into the new, for which it is responsible, will hardly justify 
 Mohler's patronizing terms concerning it, and still less the calm 
 verdict of Dr. Hodge, in an essay on the " History of Creeds " : 
 " The theology taught in all these Papal standards is Armin- 
 ianism." 
 
 From a German point of view the Anabaptists and Mennon- 
 ites are necessary factors in a comparison of the Confessions. 
 But to an English eye they seem like fossils even in a German 
 work, and in every sense are obsolete in a symbolical survey. 
 They pertain to one family, the badge of which was the 
 rejection of infant baptism, a badge less honourable in its 
 history on the Continent than in its history in England and 
 America. The Anabaptists proper belong rather to ecclesias- 
 tical than to dogmatic history. By their frightful excesses 
 they disturbed the progress of the Eeformation more than any 
 other among the elements of Luther's difficulty. Melanchthon 
 did them too much honour in his elaborate refutation of their 
 Montanistic and other extravagances. Their name, if not their
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixvii 
 
 memory, has perished: one of their principles, however, having 
 survived in a purer form. Towards the middle of the seven- 
 teenth century Menno Simonis formed a Baptist community 
 in Holland, which mingled with its own creed many of the 
 fanatical notions of the Anabaptists, and some of those which 
 Quakerism has made familiar to us, adding to the whole a 
 rite peculiar to itself, the feet- washing. They have since mul- 
 tiplied into smaller sects with which our subject is not con- 
 cerned. As to the original body, nothing need be added to 
 the information of our work, save that the limitation of the 
 Sacrament of Baptism to adult believers is the only point in 
 common between them and the Baptists known to ourselves. 
 
 Finally, on this branch of the subject, it must be remem- 
 bered that the elaborate Socinian Confessions and catechisms 
 which figure so largely in our volume are, strictly speaking, 
 as much extinct as those of the Anabaptists. This is a 
 plain fact, but it is one the significance of which is some- 
 times lost sight of. What the Socinian doctrine was, and 
 what its links were with the primitive heresies of the second 
 century lineal descent it had none, Winer's work will show. 
 What it does not indicate, the affinity with Arianism on the 
 one hand and the doctrine of Praxeas and the rest on the 
 other, must be gathered from the history of Christian doctrine. 
 What is here necessary is to indicate that our English 
 Socinianism, so called, is a very different thing from that 
 which figures in these columns. It is as far removed from 
 its prototype in Poland as the Baptist doctrine in England is 
 from its Anabaptist representative in the Eeformation age. But 
 in an opposite direction ; for, whereas among our Baptists the 
 stream has run clear of its defecations, Unitarianism in Eng- 
 land and America has thrown off much, if not all, of the 
 dogmatic precision and doctrinal consistency and supernatural 
 dignity of its Continental ancestry. The term supernatural 
 will point the way to what we mean. The old Socinianism 
 adopted Rationalist principles at the outset, rejected the
 
 Ixviii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 traditional Christianity of past ages, and constructed its 
 theory of Christ's Person and work by the light of its own 
 rational interpretation of the Scriptures. But it held fast 
 the doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture, or of its quasi- 
 inspiration; though it had no inspiring Person, it had an 
 inspiring influence, to elevate the Bible above other literature. 
 It also perceived clearly the supernatural element that per- 
 vades the Bible, and its Christ therefore was not in the world 
 under the ordinary conditions of mankind. Hence the modern 
 historians of theology in Germany, generalizing after their 
 fashion, represent Socinianism as the beginning of Rationalism 
 with the supernatural added. The effect of this is apparent 
 in the Socinian formularies, especially as they refer to the 
 Person of Christ. Not divine, He is nevertheless preter- 
 naturally conceived and endowed ; He is capable of receiving 
 communications from God denied to all others, and of im- 
 parting those communications as no others could impart them ; 
 and the honour put upon Him is such as no mere mortal 
 could bear and live. At three points in the Saviour's 
 history, Socinianism set upon Him a remarkable seal of 
 dignity. In His birth, when God created Him not after the 
 manner of men; at His rapture into heaven, where, lifted 
 nearer to God than Paul was, He received such know- 
 ledge of divine things as neither man nor angels had ever 
 received; and at His ascension, when He was raised to a 
 supreme dignity over the universe. This strain of comment 
 might be pursued, but here also we must forbear from going 
 out of our prescribed sphere. Enough is said to indicate why 
 the Sociuian is placed among the Christians, and his Creed as 
 carefully examined and collated as any other. Now that old 
 Socinianism is extinct saving in annals, it marks a stage in 
 a great development no more. It did not rise high enough to 
 admit of recovery to the truth ; it did not sink low enough to 
 satisfy the proclivities of rationalistic error. Its Confessions re- 
 main simply to show that in that sifting age it had its probation.
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixix 
 
 The consideration of modern Unitarianism leads to the 
 second branch of this topic, and the last of our general obser- 
 vations : the supplement that the English reader must bring 
 to Winer's Collection of Creeds. It may be as well to say at 
 once that there are no Confessions which have to be added. 
 The old Confessions are still used, though with certain modi- 
 fications, by those communities which hang upon Creeds and 
 Articles. The majority, however, dispense with them, and 
 content themselves with a more or less defined tradition of 
 faith. In fact, the ancient symbols which at the Reformation 
 became Confessions, have in these last days become Platforms, 
 to use the American word, Standards, as the English call them. 
 A few general observations on these will close our preparatory 
 labours. 
 
 The modern Unitarians are not included in Winer's sym- 
 bolical survey. In fact they were not known to him. The 
 representatives in Germany of their type of doctrine were not 
 reckoned among Christian communities ; not indeed that they 
 existed in numbers too small to form congregations, they 
 formed many congregations that did not bear their name, or 
 betray outwardly their departure from the old faith, but the 
 far greater part of them were content with a practical indif- 
 ference and literary infidelity ; they were the Illuminati who 
 retired from the communion of the Church, and calmly sat 
 over against the cross, pondering and criticising. Among the 
 churches of Germany and Switzerland there have been many 
 ruled by Socinian opinions, but there have been none that 
 avowed any obligation to the Socini. They have reserved 
 their allegiance for a mightier potentate, the human reason. 
 In other words, they do not give themselves the name of any 
 man ; because no one man in any one age can represent the 
 flux of opinions that change with the progression of the race. 
 Nor do they set up any Confession of Faith ; and for the same 
 reason : the next generation ought not to be bound by the 
 opinions or prejudices of its predecessor. Nor do they con-
 
 Ixx INTRODUCTION. 
 
 descend to adopt an appellation that might simply negative 
 some current opinion, such, for instance, as Unitarianism ; 
 for their opinions negative not one current opinion only, but 
 the entire code of Christian beliefs. On the Continent, Soci- 
 nianism is as extinct as it is with us ; but there it has not our 
 substitute. Unitarianism is an English and American system 
 of doctrine, comprising an infinite variety of opinions on all 
 religious subjects, which are kept in a sort of cohesion by the 
 central affirmation that Christ was and is only man. That is 
 their Creed, Confession, and Standard reduced to unity. If 
 that be maintained, every dogma of the old Creed may be 
 held, or renounced, or modified, according to the measure of the 
 illumination of every man or every church. Confessions, or 
 Articles of Faith, or terms of concord, are out of the question. 
 They are at once needless and impossible : needless, because the 
 simplicity of the one article needs no formula ; and impossible, 
 because there are and always have been among them as many 
 opinions as there are teachers, in regard to the variety of 
 topics that enter into the construction of a Confession of Faith. 
 When, therefore, in an adaptation of Winer to the English 
 point of view, we substitute Unitarianism for ancient Soci- 
 nianism, or rather make the former an appendage of the latter, 
 it must be with a considerable reservation. In fact, all that 
 is necessary is to insert among the observations the note, that 
 the modern representatives of Socinus have no Confession or 
 Standard from which an authoritative statement may be ex- 
 tracted on any one point in Christian theology. In leaving 
 the subject thus, we abstain from entering upon any historical 
 review of the variety of phases through which the Unita- 
 rian theory has passed in reaching its present stage of 
 creedless development That would be an interesting, how- 
 ever painful, task ; there is abundance of materials for it at 
 hand, but it does not belong to our province. A compara- 
 tive survey of the Confessions cannot include a community 
 whose Confession is limited to one negation, and beyond
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixxi 
 
 that has no standard of appeal and no force of general 
 obligation. 
 
 Before leaving the Unitarians, we may observe that there 
 seems to be a tendency among the writers of some communi- 
 ties to put such an interpretation upon the doctrine of the 
 Trinity as would issue in a dogma never yet found in any 
 Confession or heresy. Many a theologian in Germany, loyal 
 in general to the Augsburg Confession, nevertheless indulges 
 in speculations, and shapes them into definitions, which are 
 neither Trinitarian, nor Tritheistic, nor Arian, nor Sabellian, 
 but simply their own. The fashion set abroad has been copied 
 at home. How many writers are there owning a professed 
 allegiance to the Thirty-nine Articles, whose teaching on this 
 subject bears the same character ! Stripped of their refine- 
 ments, their definitions would be reduced to naked Unitarianism. 
 "Were such Trinitarians in profession, but Unitarians in heart, 
 to define honestly their Creed to themselves, they must needs 
 join this community. There are not wanting indications that 
 this method of refining upon the doctrine of the Trinity finds 
 favour in some other communities not so rigidly bound to 
 their articles as the Church of England. Of course, the Uni- 
 tarian Creed using that term in a conventional sense may 
 claim these teachers ; and, taking them into account, its influ- 
 ence may be said to be extending in England. Apart from 
 that, however, and viewed as a distinct type of Christian 
 belief, it holds but a slight and waning position in English 
 Christendom. 
 
 The doctrinal Confession of the Presbyterians and Congre- 
 gationalists of Great Britain and America may be said to be 
 shaped generally by the Westminster Confession, with its 
 accompanying Catechism. The history of this celebrated 
 formulary is given in our work : any one who desires to 
 enlarge its scanty notices has abundant materials for doing so. 
 Not excepting the Canons of Dort, no Confession so fully 
 expresses the doctrine of the Reformed branch of the Eefor-
 
 Ixxii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 mation, and none has exerted so much influence in Christendom. 
 It is the common formulary of the Presbyterian Churches in 
 the old and new world. The Congregational Convention, 
 which met at the Savoy in 1658, declared their acceptance of 
 the doctrinal part of the Confession and Catechisms of the 
 Westminster Assembly ; and, in fact, formed their Savoy Con- 
 fession on its basis. For a long time the Assembly's Catechisms 
 were generally used by all these communities ; and to some 
 extent even now that is the case. They were adopted in 
 America by the Puritan founders of American Christendom. 
 Since the seventeenth century, platform after platform has 
 reconstructed or modified the original form to harmonize it 
 with American institutions, but the essential body of the 
 old Confession has remained intact. It remains to this 
 day the avowed or unavowed directory of the religious faith of 
 all who, throughout the English-speaking world, hold to the 
 traditions of Puritan theology. Broadly speaking, then, the 
 citations from the Westminster Confession in this volume may 
 be taken as representing the faith of Presbyterians and Con- 
 gregationalists, whether Independent or Baptist. This, however, 
 is speaking very broadly. Both the latter branches have again 
 and again published documents which have the character of 
 Confessions. 
 
 A large number of Baptist congregations adopted, in 16*77, 
 a modification of the Westminster Confession, which contains 
 the following articles :" Baptism is an ordinance of the New 
 Testament. . . . Those who do actually profess repentance 
 towards God, faith in and obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ-, 
 are the only proper objects of this ordinance. . . . Immersion, 
 or dipping of the body in water, is necessary to the due ad- 
 ministration of that ordinance. . . . All ignorant and ungodly 
 persons, as they are unfit to enjoy communion with Christ, so 
 are they unworthy of the Lord's table." An earlier Confession, 
 in 1646, dilates more fully upon one point: " The way and 
 manner of dispensing this ordinance is dipping or plunging the
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixxiii 
 
 body under water. It, being a sign, must answer the things 
 signified ; which is, that interest the saints have in the death, 
 burial, and resurrection of Christ ; and that, as certainly as 
 the body is buried under water, and risen again, so certainly 
 shall the bodies of the saints be raised by the power of Christ 
 in the day of the resurrection, to reign with Christ." In our 
 own day, the formulary from which this last extract is taken 
 has been republished with general acceptance. It may be said 
 that the Baptist Confession of Faith, though not binding as 
 such, and free in lesser details, is consistently and firmly held 
 as a general tradition in England. With its Westminster type 
 of the doctrines of Grace, its congregational principles of church 
 government, its own peculiar theory of one of the Sacraments, 
 and in some respects of both, it is a clear and definite system. 
 Placed, however, among the Confessions of Christendom, whether 
 of ancient or modern times, it is an isolated, exceptional, and 
 very fragmentary representation of Christian doctrine. 
 
 The modern Independents have found it necessary to add 
 some kind of standards to their original Confession, though in 
 the adoption of these standards they do not forget the idea 
 that lurks in their general designation. A few extracts from 
 a " Declaration of Faith, Church Order, and Discipline " will 
 explain very clearly their position. Among the preliminary 
 notes are these : " 1. It is not designed in the following 
 summary to do more than to state the leading doctrines of 
 faith and order maintained by Congregational Churches in 
 general. 4. It is not intended that the following statement 
 should be put forth with any authority, or as a standard to 
 which assent should be required. 5. Disallowing the utility 
 of creeds and articles of religion as a bond of union, and pro- 
 testing against subscription to any human formularies as a 
 term of communion, Congregationalists are yet willing to 
 declare, for general information, what is commonly believed 
 among them, reserving to every one the most perfect liberty 
 of conscience. 7. They wish it to be observed that, not with-
 
 Ixxiv INTRODUCTION. 
 
 standing their jealousy of subscription to creeds and articles, 
 and their disapproval of the imposition of any human standard, 
 whether of faith or discipline, they are far more agreed in 
 their doctrines and practices than any Church which enjoins 
 subscription and enforces a human standard of orthodoxy ; and 
 they believe that there is no minister and no Church among 
 them that would deny the substance of any one of the follow- 
 ing doctrines of religion, though each might prefer to state his 
 sentiments in his own way." These assertions might seem 
 sufficient to vindicate the propriety of passing on, since a 
 place among the Confessions must needs be denied to those 
 who protest against symbols in every form. But a few more 
 extracts may be useful as showing where the Congregationalist? 
 would be found were they to accept a place : " 9. They 
 believe that, in the fulness of the time, the Son of God was 
 manifested in the flesh, being born of the Virgin Mary, but 
 conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit ; and that our Lord 
 Jesus Christ was both the Son of man and the Son of God, 
 partaking fully and truly of human nature, though without 
 sin; equal with the Father, and 'the express image of His 
 Person.' 14. They believe that all who will be saved were 
 the objects of God's eternal and electing love, and were given 
 by act of divine sovereignty to the Son of God ; which in no 
 way interferes with the system of means, nor with the ground 
 of human responsibility, being wholly unrevealed as to its 
 objects, and not a rule of human duty. 15. They believe in 
 the perpetual obligation of Baptism and the Lord's Supper: 
 the former to be administered to all converts to Christ and 
 their children, by the application of water to the subject ' in 
 the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy 
 Ghost ;' and the latter to be celebrated by Christian Churches 
 as a token of faith on the Saviour, and of brotherly love." If 
 carefully examined, these declarations will be found to allow a 
 wide latitude as to the Calvinistic peculiarities of the West- 
 minster Confession, as also upon the Sacraments, while strictly
 
 INTEODUCTION. 1XXV 
 
 faithful, in articles not quoted, to the doctrines of the Trinity 
 and the Person of Christ, and the authority of the Scriptures. 
 As to the specific principles of the church government of the 
 Congregationalists, the following is the final statement : 
 " 7. The power of admission into any Christian Church, and 
 rejection from it, they believe to be vested in the Church 
 itself, and to be exercised only through the medium of its 
 own officers. 9. They believe that the power of a Christian 
 Church is purely spiritual, and should in no way be corrupted 
 by union with temporal or civil power. 12. They believe 
 that it is the duty of Christian Churches to hold communion 
 with each other . . . but that no Church, nor union of 
 Churches, has any right or power to interfere with the faith 
 or discipline of any other Church, further than to separate 
 from such as, in faith and practice, depart from the gospel 
 of Christ. 13. They believe that church officers, whether 
 bishops or deacons, should be chosen by the free voice of the 
 Church ; but that their dedication to the duties of their office 
 should take place with special prayer and by solemn designa- 
 tion, to which most of the Churches add the imposition of 
 hands by those already in office." If such clauses as these 
 are added to the several Reformed testimonies in Winer's list, 
 English Congregationalism, and American also, would be fairly 
 represented. But it is only historical justice to add that 
 Independent Churches claim their prerogative of independence. 
 Their trust-deeds may be orthodox' in most cases, and there 
 may reign throughout their denomination a noble tradition of 
 evangelical orthodoxy : but there is no universal safeguard by 
 the very terms of their Declaration. There is no Confession, 
 Standard, or Declaration that would in any sense represent the 
 teaching of many of its ministers, both in America and in 
 England. But we are interdicted from pursuing this topic 
 any further. Suffice that the Congregationalist Confession of 
 Faith is one that cannot be made a supplement to our volume, 
 inasmuch as it does not exist in any available form. The
 
 Ixxvi INTRODUCTION. 
 
 doctrine of these Churches is represented, so far as it is repre- 
 sented, by the testimonies of the Westminster Confession. 
 
 Among the communities of English origin to which Winer 
 gives no place, must be reckoned those which fall under the 
 general denomination of Methodist. Methodism in its original 
 form, as it first assumed the character of a Society within the 
 Church of England, and afterwards by force of circumstances 
 took rank among the Connexional Churches of Presbyterian 
 Christendom, was not forgotten by Mohler, who has traced its 
 doctrinal characteristics with a fair degree of precision. But 
 it escaped the notice of Winer, partly because to his view it 
 was an adherent of the Thirty-nine Articles, so far as the 
 Christian Faith was concerned ; and partly because whatever 
 doctrinal peculiarities it held were never formulated in any 
 Confession. Hence a few general observations are necessary 
 to show the relation of the Methodist community to the general 
 question of the Symbols. 
 
 It may be said that English Methodism has no distinct 
 Articles of faith. At the same time it is undoubtedly true 
 that no community in Christendom is more effectually hedged 
 about by confessional obligations and restraints. Eeference 
 has been made to the distinction of Creeds, Confessions, and 
 Standards. Methodism combines the three in its doctrinal 
 constitution after a manner on the whole peculiar to itself. 
 Materially if not formally, virtually if not actually, implicitly if 
 not avowedly, its theology is bound by the ancient (Ecumenical 
 Creeds, by the Articles of the English Church, and by comprehen- 
 sive standards of its own the peculiarity of its maintenance of 
 these respectively having been determined by the specific cir- 
 cumstances of its origin and consolidation, circumstances into 
 which it is not our business here to enter. In common with 
 most Christian Churches it holds fast the Catholic Symbols : 
 the Apostolical and Nicene are extensively used in its Liturgy, 
 and the Athanasian, not so used, is accepted so far as concerns 
 its doctrinal type. The doctrine of the Articles of the Church
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixxvii 
 
 of England is the doctrine of Methodism. This assertion must 
 be, of course, taken broadly, as subject to many qualifications. 
 For instance : the Connexion has never avowed the Articles as 
 its Confession of Faith ; some of those Articles have no meaning 
 for it in its present constitution ; others of them are tolerated 
 in their vague and doubtful bearing rather than accepted as 
 definitions ; and, finally, many Methodists would prefer to dis- 
 own any relation to them of any kind. Still, the verdict of the his- 
 torical theologian, who takes a comprehensive view of the estate 
 of Christendom in regard to the history and development of 
 Christian truth, would locate the Methodist community under 
 the Thirty-nine Articles. He would draw his inference from 
 the posture towards them of the early founders of the system ; 
 and he would not fail to mark that the American branch of 
 the family, which has spread simultaneously with its European 
 branch, has retained the Articles of the English Church, with 
 some necessary modifications, as the basis of its Confession of 
 Faith. Setting aside the articles that have to do with discipline 
 rather than doctrine, the Methodists universally hold the re- 
 mainder as tenaciously as any of those who sign them, and 
 with as much consistency as the great mass of English divines 
 who have given them an Arminian interpretation. That is 
 to say, where they diverge in doctrine from the Westminster 
 Confession, Methodism holds to them ; while this Confession 
 rather expresses their views on Presbyterian Church govern- 
 ment. It may suffice to say generally on this subject, that so 
 far as concerns the present volume, every quotation from the 
 English Articles may stand, if justly interpreted, as a represen- 
 tative of the Methodist Confession. Finally, we have the 
 Methodist Standards, belonging to it as a society within 
 a church, which entirely regulate the faith of the com- 
 munity, but are binding only upon its ministers. Those 
 Standards are to be found in certain rather extensive theologi- 
 cal writings which have none of the features of a Confession 
 of Faith, and are never subscribed or accepted as such. More
 
 Ixxviii INTRODUCTION. 
 
 particularly, they are some Sermons and Expository Notes of 
 John Wesley ; more generally, these and other writings, cate- 
 chisms, and early precedents of doctrinal definition ; taken as 
 a whole, they indicate a standard of experimental and practi- 
 cal theology to which the teaching and preaching of its mini- 
 sters are universally conformed. What that standard prescribes 
 in detail it would be impossible to define here. It is not our 
 task to furnish the supplement to our volume, but to point out 
 what it includes, and how it may be made. Suffice that the 
 Methodist doctrine is what is generally termed Anninian as it 
 regards the relation of the human race to redemption ; that it 
 lays great stress upon, the personal assurance which seals the 
 personal religion of the believer ; and that it includes a strong 
 testimony to the office of the Holy Spirit in the entire renewal 
 of the soul in holiness as one of the provisions of the covenant 
 of grace upon earth. It may be added, though only as an 
 historical fact, that a rigorous maintenance of this common 
 standard of evangelical doctrine has been attended by the pre- 
 servation of a remarkable unity of doctrine throughout this 
 large communion. 
 
 Omitting Swedenborgianism, a system not indigenous in 
 England, which we are not bound to regard as one of the 
 Confessions of Christendom, the " Catholic and Apostolic 
 Church" represents a certain aggregate of tendencies, doctrines, 
 and ritual that is in process of forming a confession, though it 
 has none as yet to furnish. This community sprang, in the 
 person of its founder, from what would be called, in the lan- 
 guage of historical theology, a modern Montanistic spirit. Its 
 tenets include the renewal of the apostolate, the restoration of 
 the miraculous signs of the early Church, and a consequent re- 
 construction of the estate of Christ's Body upon earth. Its 
 early doctrine as to the identity between the Lord's human 
 nature and that of man as fallen, has fallen into the category 
 of unformulated beliefs. Its importations from Catholic anti- 
 quity, as interpreted by Rome, are not clearly defined : for,
 
 INTRODUCTION. Ixxix 
 
 though transubstantiation is denied, and the repetition on 
 human altars of the one oblation, what its sacramental doctrine 
 is can be determined by no adequate authority. Its high 
 millenarian theories are left in the same indefinite state. 
 And, as a whole, this modern phenomenon cannot as yet be 
 classed among the Confessions of Christendom. It is a com- 
 posite of all the Confessions, as its ritual is a composite of all 
 the Eites of Christendom. The reader who would add this 
 community to his supplement must take the pains to read 
 many a treatise, and to explore a very miscellaneous service- 
 book. He will find much to reward his curiosity as a student 
 of the developments of the Christian Church ; but he will 
 find it difficult to construct the appropriate confessional 
 column. 
 
 After all that has been said, there remains another supple- 
 mentary question which the student of Symbolism must add 
 in his own way. It does not refer to any particular class of 
 doctrinal judgment that might be added to the tabulation, nor 
 is it confined to English Christianity. It is more or less 
 common to all forms of the Christian religion, and includes 
 many very important elements of belief and teaching which 
 defy systematization, but nevertheless enter largely into many 
 systems and exert a mighty influence in the Church's develop- 
 ment. These tendencies represent the body of unformulated 
 opinions which belong to all Confessions : undertones of Chris- 
 tian doctrine which characterize men rather than communities, 
 and act upon them rather as modes of thinking than as defi- 
 nite beliefs. Tendencies to Millenarianism, which Judaizes 
 the second coming of Christ as St. Paul's enemies Judaized the 
 first coming; tendencies to a ritualistic Christianity which 
 would restore to it a symbolical character from which the New 
 Testament declares it free ; tendencies to modify the traditional 
 faith of Christendom as to the justice of God, the atonement 
 for human sin, and the everlasting issues of the judgment ; 
 tendencies generally to make the reason of man the standard
 
 l.KXX INTRODUCTION. 
 
 instead of the Scripture : these, and many others which are 
 subordinate expressions of these, are obvious enough to the 
 intelligent survey of the Christian theologian. But, generally 
 speaking, they make no sign : they take no form, they construct 
 no creed, and they have only to be watched and guarded 
 against as passing phenomena. One tendency there is which 
 steadily aims to dissipate the Dogma of Christianity altogether, 
 and to set free the mind of man from any restraint whatever 
 upon its religious sentiments. Against this tendency, which 
 would issue, if unchecked but that is a thing impossible 
 in the subversion of the Christian Faith, the study of the pre- 
 sent work is one the most effectual safeguards.
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 I. 
 
 ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE SEVERAL COMMUNIONS, AS 
 EXHIBITED IN THEIR STANDARDS. 
 
 1. [TiiE scientific exhibition of the doctrinal systems of the 
 several Christian communions has occupied the earnest atten- 
 tion of evangelical theologians from the times of the Reforma- 
 tion. As these theologians, however, mostly wrote under the 
 conviction that they had to maintain a pure confession of the 
 truth of God's word, their treatment of the opposite doctrine 
 naturally assumed the form of a warfare conducted in God's 
 name against error. From, this spirit sprang the Examen 
 Concilii Tridentini of Martin Chemnitz, itself not the least signi- 
 ficant production of the sixteenth century. The devastation 
 which Rationalism wrought in the Church set a limit to this 
 kind of work. What interest had the question concerning a 
 sinner's justification before God through the blood of Christ, 
 for men who believed neither in the divinity of the Son nor 
 in the existence of God the Father ? Planck, indeed, recalled 
 attention to the half-forgotten doctrinal antitheses, but only 
 as an historical writer ; and it was reserved for this last age 
 to summon back the science of Polemics, even to its very 
 name. 
 
 Among the older polemic works of our Chxirch may be mentioned, 
 as the most important : 
 
 Schliisselburg, Hcereticorum Cataloyus. Frankfurt, 1597-1599. 
 
 A
 
 2 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Calovius, Synopsis Controversiarum. Wittemberg, 1653. 
 Fr. Bechmann, Theologia Polcmica. Jena, 1710. 
 Olearius, Synopsis Controversiarum Selectiorum. Leipzig, 1710. . 
 Schubert, Institutiones Theologies Polemicce. Jena, 1756.J 
 To which may be added the works of Planck, Abriss der dogmat. 
 
 Systeme; Marheinecke, Christ. Symbolik, and Institutiones Sym- 
 
 bolicce ; and the English Bishop Marsh. 
 
 [Of late years, the controversy with Rome has stimulated this 
 literature. In 1832 appeared Mohler's Symbolik, a book 
 from which we can learn neither the Evangelical nor the 
 Romish doctrine. The author created for himself a fantastic 
 system, and seeks to set forth its advantages in the most 
 favourable light. F. C. Baur answered him by the Gcgensatz 
 des Katholicismus und Protestantismus, Nitzsch by the Protestan- 
 tische Beantwortung der Symbolik Mohlcrs, and E. Sartorius by 
 the Soli Deo Gloria. After Mohler arose on the Romish side 
 Perrone, an Italian Jesuit, superior to his German predecessor 
 in keenness and in power of systematization : he wrote the 
 Prcelcctioncs Theologicoe, and, in its German form, Der Protes- 
 tantismus und die Glaubensregel. Hase replied in his Hand- 
 buch der protestantiscJien Polemik. Works of more general 
 interest are : Guerike, Allgemeine christl. Symbolik ; Kollner, 
 Symbolik ; Karsten, Populcere Symlolik ; and Graul, Die Uhter- 
 scheidungslehrenJ] . 
 
 2. It is obvious that Symbolical Theology must regard as 
 the exclusive source of its scientific material the written ex- 
 hibitions of doctrine which every ecclesiastical communion 
 has put forth as the authentic confession of its faith. It is 
 true that those individual divines who bear an orthodox 
 character in their own party, may be supposed to have this 
 advantage in their favour, that even their private writings 
 will be in conformity with their standards. But then this 
 report of orthodoxy, which proceeds not from the Church 
 itself, but from the theologians of a particular age, does not 
 exclude the possibility of deviations from the strict confession ; 
 and it is the object of Symbolic Theology to exhibit the dog- 
 matic convictions of any community down to the finer details. 
 Moreover, in the learned treatises of systematic divinity, there
 
 INTRODUCTION. 3 
 
 Is always more or less concomitant of scientific apparatus; 
 and this makes it .difficult to distinguish between what is 
 symbolical and what is merely the deduction of the author, or 
 his particular manner of clothing the truth, that is, between 
 the confession of faith and dogmatic theology. Consequently, 
 it is equally safe and becoming to fall back upon the con- 
 fessions, and to make them the sole basis of Symbolics as a 
 science. Now every Christian communion has such confes- 
 sions, since each was once under the obligation of proclaiming 
 publicly its distinctive faith. These documents are some- 
 times in the form of specific articles of faith, sometimes in 
 the form of catechisms. 1 Generally, however, every commu- 
 nity has both kinds of authentic symbolic writings at once. 
 In this case the confessions have the precedence; yet the 
 catechisms must not be overlooked, since in them there often 
 reigns more perspicuity than in the confessions, which are 
 sometimes drawn up in ambiguous phraseology. 
 
 Against Symbolic Theology, as limiting itself to the authentic 
 symbolical documents, two objections may be urged. First, 
 it may be said that it presents, at least in regard to such 
 communities as have anything like a continuous growth of 
 doctrine, an obsolete system, in a certain sense long ago 
 petrified ; hence, indeed, Planck thought it needful to append 
 to his sketch a glance at the more recent dogmatic teachings 
 (of Rationalism). But since Symbolics must, in order not to 
 lose its independent character, proceed from the idea of what 
 has been ecclesiastically sanctioned, and since a symbolical 
 system must needs be valid as such until the Church itself 
 has remodelled, improved, or retracted it, that fixed standard 
 must always be kept in view. The exhibition of the devia- 
 tions in dogmatical teaching, even when they have become 
 predominant among the doctors of the community in question, 
 must be handed over to the history of Christian Doctrine. 2 
 
 1 The liturgical books of a Christian community have inferior value in 
 Symbolics, although they also are really public (indirect) confessions of doctrine. 
 They are seldom needed in this branch of theology. 
 
 2 It is well known that the Reformed theologians do not acknowledge to the 
 same extent as the Lutherans the obligatory character of their (in themselves 
 almost only provincial) symbols, and that in the lapse of time even catechetical 
 instruction has receded from its ancient symbolical rigour. But even in this
 
 4 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 The second objection has been urged against Symbolical 
 Theology mainly by Romish theologians. They maintain 
 that he who holds fast to the symbols exhibits only a school 
 theology, to which their Church attaches little value ; more- 
 over, that he deals only with the forms, which are only symbols 
 of higher religious ideas, and should serve only as involucra 
 to them. But inasmuch as the Church has never openly 
 declared that it was willing to let one part of its teaching fall 
 away as mere school theology, and be struck out of the series 
 of its articles of faith, and has never even distantly hinted 
 that its dogmatic sanctions were to be regarded as only the 
 symbols of a spiritual religion, the Protestant must, following 
 the older and orthodox dogmatic divines, who apprehended 
 them all literally, disapprove of every endeavour on the part 
 of Romish theologians to idealize the doctrines of their Church, 
 even as they resist the unregulated essays of Protestant 
 divines to adapt the symbolical standards to a new philosophy, 
 and exhibit them as the wisdom of reason. Symbolics must 
 needs go on in the historical way, avoiding all references to 
 more recent Romanist dogmatists, and all idealizing remon- 
 strances ; taking extracts from the Romish symbols with 
 the same literal fidelity as those of the Formula Concordice ; 
 convinced that the original framers of both gave a genuine 
 account of their belief, and did not aim to delude the world 
 by secret symbolism. And, in fact, the most recent Romish 
 symbolical divines and polemics have renounced those idealiz- 
 ing tactics. 
 
 3. Another question may arise, as to the compass of what 
 may be called Symbolics, and as to the principles which 
 should be laid down for this science and its internal organiza- 
 tion. Planck embraced only the three leading Christian Con- 
 fessions and the Socinians within the circle of his plan; 
 Marheinecke does not in his greater work go beyond this, 
 though in his Institutes he has devoted some attention to the 
 
 case Symbolics must go back to the confessions, since the Church, at the time 
 when they appeared, recognised the doctrinal system they contain as its own, 
 and never publicly sanctioned any transformation of it. The same holds good 
 of the Arminians, who are less favourable to all symbolical forms of doctrine.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 5 
 
 Mennonites, the Moravians, and the Quakers. Now it can 
 scarcely be doubted that the doctrine of the Greek Orthodox 
 Church, 1 which contains much that deviates from the Eomish, 
 and is exhibited iii symbols expressed in clear though not 
 always scientifically rigorous terms, as much merits a specific 
 presentation as the Eeformed doctrine does by the side of the 
 Lutheran. The Arminians might perhaps urge a fainter plea 
 for such a distinction, since they sprang from the bosom of 
 the Eeformed Church, and agree with it still in all but a few 
 leading points, which are themselves not always of a dogmatic 
 character. Yet, inasmuch as the differences do involve lead- 
 ing points, and the community is externally a firmly conso- 
 lidated one, it is impossible to deny to the Arminian system 
 of doctrine a place in our Symbolics. The Quakers and the 
 Mennonites have little that is peculiar in the detail of doctrine ; 
 and where a precise definition of faith according to the funda- 
 mental ideas of theology is in question, they might be omitted, 
 because they do little more than repeat the words of Scripture, 
 and keep clear of the theology of the schools : therefore we do 
 not devote a special column to them in our tables, but refer to 
 them only in the explanatory notes. 
 
 All these various religious communities, however, may fitly 
 be ranked by Symbolical Theology under two heads, according 
 to their several principles. The one class acknowledge as the 
 source of Christian revelation the Holy Scriptures alone, limit- 
 ing the acting of direct inspiration to these, though distin- 
 guished among themselves by different explanations of that 
 inspiration. Here we have the principle of Protestantism. 
 The other class place by the side of Scripture, or above it, a 
 second source of knowledge, believing in a continuous inspi- 
 ration within the Christian Church. They either (1) assign 
 to the Church, led by the Spirit, the right of constructing 
 Christian saving truth out of a supposed oral tradition of the 
 apostles, which is Catholicism ; or (2) they assume an im- 
 mediate illumination of every individual through the Holy 
 Ghost, which is Quakerism. These two principles, for the 
 
 1 The schismatical sects of the'East cannot well be introduced into Compara- 
 tive Symbolics, inasmuch as their dogmatic testimony is not expressed in autho- 
 rized writings, or their present faith is only imperfectly known.
 
 6 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 designation of which the historically known names are not 
 definitive enough, are precise antitheses. [The Mennonites 
 are, as a rule, and not without reason, classed with the Pro- 
 testants. So are the Socinians, but only by abuse of terms.] 
 
 4. If we take a comparative view of the dogmatic deviations 
 of the individual communities, we find at once the following 
 results : First, the greatest number and the most important 
 revolve around three centres : the relation of human power to 
 the work of sanctification proposed to it ; the extent and the 
 influence of the merit of Christ ; the manner in which, and 
 the means by which, man appropriates the merit of Christ, 
 and attains to justification before God. All start from the uni- 
 versal principle of Christianity, that man is in a religious and 
 ethical point of view fallen from God, but that in Christ there 
 is a possibility of a return, and that he must accomplish 
 that return in the use of the means provided for him in the 
 economy of the Christian salvation. Secondly, those indivi- 
 dual deviations of the individual communions do indeed always 
 stand in evident and clear connection, and are formed into a 
 system ; but yet they do not flow from one material principle 
 (principium constitutivum) by an internal necessity, a fact 
 which gave the older polemical divines occasion to distinguish 
 between errores systematici and errores extra systematici. Ac- 
 cordingly we have thought fit here and there to make a differ- 
 ence between main dogmas and subordinate dogmas. 
 
 5. The business of the symbolical theologian, to extract 
 from the documentary Confessions of the various communities 
 their doctrinal systems, is not without difficulty. On the one 
 hand, these Confessions do not always embrace the entire 
 dogmatic beliefs of the Communion ; and, on the other, they 
 are not all drawn up with the precision which science loves 
 and demands. To illustrate both these points : 1. In the 
 Council of Trent, the dogmas of the Image of God, and of 
 Justification, and of Works of Supererogation, and of Indul- 
 gences, are only imperfectly exhibited. In the Eeformed Con- 
 fessions nothing is said about Infant Communion; in the 
 Lutheran, the intention of the priest at the administration of
 
 INTRODUCTION. 7 
 
 tlie sacraments is not expressly contested. 2. As it respects 
 dogmatic precision, the Tridentine Council and the Lutheran 
 formularies (especially the Formula ConcordicB) are far above 
 the Eeformed Confessions, which (particularly in the Eucharist 
 doctrine) use many figurative expressions ; while they still more 
 surpass the Greek, which indeed sometimes contradict each 
 other. Symbolics, therefore, cannot accomplish its task by 
 drawing simply from the symbols, but must sometimes apply 
 critical combinations in order to arrive at a full and clear 
 understanding of the doctrine of any community. If a dogma 
 is merely indicated, our science does not err when it exhibits 
 it in that form which, when the Confession was drawn up, was 
 the current one. (For instance : the Eomish doctrine de merito 
 congrui et condiyni, that of Indulgences, and that of the effect 
 of the sacraments ex opere operato.) 
 
 If a doctrinal point has been entirely passed over, because 
 it was held unimportant or already sufficiently treated, or 
 because at the time when the Confession appeared it was not 
 contested, in that case the historically demonstrated doctrine 
 or observance of the Church must represent the symbol : for 
 instance, as to the communion of children in the Eeformed 
 Church. If a dogma is indistinctly expressed, the symbolist 
 must seek to define it, either by comparison with such dogmas 
 as are in close connection with the one in question, and must 
 be regarded as the grounds of it, or deductions from it ; or, 
 where such combination is impossible, he must faithfully pre- 
 serve the indistinct expressions of the symbol itself, and ad- 
 duce, apart from the doctrinal standard, explanations from the 
 writings of theologians counted orthodox by the community. 
 When, finally, a difference occurs between the several Con- 
 fessions of. one Communion, it is to be expressly stated if this 
 was founded in a gradual change in the doctrinal standard ; or 
 only indicated, if a merely wavering point
 
 8 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 II. 
 
 THE SYMBOLICAL DOCUMENTS ; OR, LITERARY ANALYSIS OF 
 THE PUBLIC CONFESSIONS AND STANDARDS OF THE 
 SEVERAL COMMUNIONS. 
 
 I. THE EOMISH CHURCH. 
 1. Primary Sources of the Roman Catiwlic Doctrine. 
 
 Canoncs et Dccreta Concilii Tridentini. The Canons and 
 Decrees of the Council of Trent, which was opened at Trent, 
 in the Tyrol, on the 13th Dec. 1545; removed, after eight 
 sessions, to Bologna on 28th April 1552 ; re-opened May 1551 
 in Trent, and closed there on 28th April 1552 ; once more 
 renewed on the 18th Jan. 1562 ; and finally closed, with the 
 twenty-fifth session, on the 3d and 4th Dec. 1563. 1 This 
 was reckoned, till lately, the eighteenth and last (Ecumenical 
 Council, acknowledged as such throughout the Roman Catholic 
 Church, and even in France, so far as dogma is concerned. Its 
 Decrees were, after Pope Pius iv. had confirmed them by a 
 Bull (Benedictus Deus], 26th Jan. 1564, published authorita- 
 tively through the press of Paulus Manutius at Eome in 1564. 2 
 Other editions followed in the same year at Koine, Venice, 
 Antwerp, Lyons, Cologne ; in 1580 an edition was sent out 
 at Lyons, with observations, and the Index libror. prohibit. 
 The most trustworthy, for correctness and completeness, of the 
 later editions are those of Gallemart, Chiflet, and Le Plat. 
 These Decrees have been translated into several living tongues : 
 
 1 The history of this Council, which of itself explains much in the Decrees, 
 must be sought in two older works, written in a very different spirit : 1. That 
 of Fra Paolo (Paul Sarpi), originally in Italian ; 2. That of Sforza Pallavicini, 
 also originally in Italian. A. Saliq wrote a complete history of the Council, 
 Halle 1741. Bungener's is less trustworthy. A general view is given by 
 Preuss, das Condi von Trident. (Berlin, 1862.) But he who would gain a 
 thoroughly complete insight into the history of the Council, must go to Le 
 Plat's collection of its Acts in Monumentorum ad hist. Cone. Trid. illustrandam 
 spectantium amplissima Cottectio (Lovanii, 1781). G. J. Planck's Anecdota ad 
 hist. Cone. Trid. (Gb'ttingen, 1791) may be added with advantage. 
 
 8 Certain errors that crept in (De Euchar. Sess. 13, where the words Spirilus 
 sancti were omitted after non absque peculiari ductu et gubernatione) were 
 cancelled in the octavo edition, Rome 1564.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 9 
 
 see Walch, Bill. TJicol. i. 407. For the purpose of Symbolics 
 only Sess. 4-7, 13, 14, 21-25 are to be taken into account. 
 The Decreta, moreover, are distributed, where they are more 
 diffuse, into chapters, which must be carefully distinguished 
 from the appended Canones, that is, brief propositions, which 
 always end with ' anathema sit.' 
 
 2. Symbolical Writings of the Second Rank. 
 
 1. Professio Fidei Tridentince. After the Synod at Trent 
 had declared a confession of faith to be obligatory (Sess. 24, 
 reform, capp. 1-12 ; Sess. 25, reform, cap. 2), this was drawn 
 up at the command of Pope Pius iv., 1564, and established 
 as a formulary binding on all who assumed any spiritual office 
 or any academical function or dignity, in a Bull dated 13th 
 Nov. 1564. It is found in the Magn. Bullarium Rom. t. 11, 
 p. 127, under the title Forma professionis fidei catli., and has 
 been often reproduced in modern languages. This Formula 
 expresses itself on some points more precisely than the Triden- 
 tine Council 
 
 2. Catechismus Romanus. This Catechism was, after a 
 decree of the Council of Trent (Sess. 25, p. 627), drawn up 
 by Archbishop Leon Marino, Bishop Egid. Foscarari, and the 
 Portuguese Fr. Fureiro, under the supervision of three Cardi- 
 nals. It was fairly latinized by P. Manutius and some others ; 
 published, under the authority of Pius v., 1566, in Latin 
 and Italian by Manutius ; and approved by many Provincial 
 Synods, including even French. It was reproduced often in 
 Latin, with observations by Fabricius in 1602, and translated 
 into several modern languages. The older editions give the 
 text without break or division; in that of Cologne, 1572, 
 books and chapters appeared; and in that of Antwerp, 1574, 
 questions and answers. This Catechism is divided into four 
 parts : de Symbolo apostolico, de Sacramcntis, de Dccalogo, de 
 Oratione dominicd. The form of a catechetical book of in- 
 struction, adapted to the use of beginners, is not enough dis- 
 tinguished from that of a directory for ministerial catechization : 
 in fact, through the constant recurrence of exhortations to the
 
 10 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 pastors, it rather assumes the character of a pastoral guide. 
 Reference is made to the Council of Trent on many points ; 
 but the Catechism further developes many doctrines, and 
 touches some which had been passed over by the Tridentine 
 Fathers : e.g., on the Limbus patrum, and on the dignity of the 
 Pontiff. On the other hand, other ecclesiastical institutes are 
 omitted : e.g., Indulgences, the Rosary, etc. The estimation of 
 this Catechism was much lowered by the Jesuits at the end 
 of the sixteenth century, on occasion of the controversies about 
 the auxilia gratia and Predestination ; and the Roman Curia 
 did nothing to counteract this. Meanwhile, in Symbolics, the 
 Catechism is safe. For, since it coincides with the Decrees of 
 the Tridentine Council, and has been accepted by Popes and 
 Bishops, it cannot possibly contain any doctrine essentially 
 opposed to Catholicism: hence even Bossuet adduces it as one of 
 the witnesses of genuine Catholicism (Monit. in expos, doct. cath). 
 Other Catechisms have attained a high consideration in the 
 Romish Church, but no proper pontifical approbation. The most 
 celebrated among these are the two Catechisms of the Jesuit 
 P. Canisius : the Larger was published first in 1554, the 
 Smaller in 1559; and both have often appeared in modern 
 languages. As to other Romish Catechisms, see the works 
 of Walch, Steudlin, and Kocher. 
 
 [3. The Bullarium Eomanum. For we are not here dealing 
 with an imaginary Catholic Church, which believes nothing but 
 what has been taught by the Tridentine Synod : we deal with 
 a palpable Romish Church, the Church which regards the 
 Pontiff at Rome as its head ; with a Church which believes 
 and confesses the immaculate conception of the Virgin on no 
 other authority than that of a single Papal Bull. And has 
 the Bull Ineffdbilis any pre-eminence over the other Bulls in 
 the Romish Bullarium ? The chief editions are : Bullarium 
 magnum Eomanum, Romae 1739-1849, 32 torn, f oL ; Bul- 
 larium magnum Eomanum a Leone magno usque ad Benedictum 
 xiv., Luxemburg 1727-1753, 19 torn. foL, with three con- 
 tinuations.] 
 
 4. The Confutatio Aug. Confess. prepared by a college of
 
 INTRODUCTION. 1 1 
 
 Bomish theologians, to whom the Emperor Charles v. gave 
 his confidence may be included here; for it undoubtedly 
 exhibits the then current faith of the Church, though wanting 
 
 * o o 
 
 in ecclesiastical authorization. (See below, iii 1.) 
 
 Two collective editions of the Symbolical sources of Eomanism have 
 lately been published : Libri Symbolici eccl. Romano-cathol., ed. cur. 
 J. T. L. Danz, Weimar 1835 ; Libri Symb. ecc. cathol. conjuncti atque 
 notis prolegomenis indie, instruct^ op. et stud. F. G. Streitwolf et 
 R. E. Klener, Gottingen, 1846. [Still more available is Denziger, 
 Enchiridion Symbolorum et deftnitionum quce de rebus fidei et morum 
 a conciliis oecumenicis et summis pontificibus emanarunt, Wirceburgi 
 1856-1865. It contains over 130 documents: among them the 
 Symbolum apostolicum in thirteen forms, the Symbolum Nic&num, the 
 Conslantinopolitanum, the Ephesium, the Epist. Flav. of Leo, the 
 Chalcedonense ; the Dogmatic Decrees of the so-called 5th, 6th, 7th, 
 and 8th General Councils ; some of the most important ordinances of 
 Popes Innocent in., Gregory ix., Clement v., and John xxii. ; the 
 most important decrees of the Councils of Constance and Florence ; 
 Bulls of Pius n. and Leo x. ; the Tridentine Decrees in full; the 
 Constitutions of Alexander vn., Innocent xi., Alexander vni., 
 Innocent xn., Clement xr., Benedict xiv., Pius vi., Pius vir. and vni., 
 Gregory xvi., and Pius ix.] 
 
 As witnesses of the Romish authoritative doctrine, may be cited 
 also : 
 
 1. The Liturgical Books, which have been sanctioned by the 
 Roman Curia, and have obtained in all countries and provinces 
 public ecclesiastical approval, especially the Missals. Among these 
 last, none is more celebrated and generally used than the Missale 
 Romanum, first printed under Sixtus IV. in 1475, and improved in 
 1570 under Pius v., in 1604 under Clement vni., and in 1634 
 under Urban vni. [The most recent change in it is due to Pius 
 ix., who removed the old liturgy of the Feast of the Conception of 
 the Virgin, and substituted a new one.] 
 
 2. The Confessions of Faith which were imposed upon those who 
 joined the Romish Church. Originally the Prof, fidei Trident, was 
 used for this purpose. There are, indeed, private writings of un- 
 known authors, and on the Roman side all dogmatic authority has 
 been denied them of late. But in a Church the doctrine of which is 
 fixed and unchangeable, the bishops must be supposed to know 
 what that doctrine is; and they must be assumed conscientiously to 
 deliver, when they speak in the name of the Church, only acknow- 
 ledged and accepted dogmatic statements. See, for many such con- 
 vert-professions, Wald, De hceresi abjuranda quid statuat ecclesia rom. 
 cathol., Regiom. 1821.
 
 12 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 The most important Roman Catholic apologies for their doctrine 
 are: Rob. Bellarmini (Jesuit and Cardinal, f 1621), Disputationes de 
 Controversiis christ. fidei adv. Intj. temp. Itcereticos. Of this work the 
 edition of Lyons, 1610, is used, which was the last aucta et recognita 
 by the author. Mart. Becani (Jesuit and Confessor of the Emperor 
 Ferdinand n., f 1624), Manuale controvers. hvj. temporis, Heidelberg 
 1759 [best edition, Cologne 1696]. F. Coster (Jesuit, f 1619 ) 
 Enchiridion controvers. prcecip. nostri temporis de relig., Colon. 1585. 
 J. B. Bossuet (Bishop of Meaux, f 1704), Exposition de la doctrine de 
 leglise catholique sur les matieres de controverse: the edition here used 
 is that of Paris, 1761. Seb. a S. Christophoro, Theologia histor. 
 polem., Bamb. 1751. [Melchior Canus, De locis theologicis (Sala- 
 manca, 1563), departs from the Romish doctrine now accepted. On 
 the other hand, Bossuet, Costerus, and Becanus are far surpassed by 
 Perrone, Prcelectiones theologicce quas in collegia Romano societatis Jesu 
 habebat (best edition, Rome, 1840-1842, but often reprinted).] 1 
 
 II. THE GREEK CHURCH. 2 
 
 f 
 
 1. Confessions. 
 
 The Confession presented to the Sultan Mahmoud n., after 
 the fall of Constantinople, 1453 that of the Patriarch Gen- 
 nadius or Georg. Scholarius extends only over the common 
 Christian dogmas, and does not touch the points of difference 
 between the Greek and the Roman doctrine. It is printed in 
 Greek and Turkish, in M. Crusii Turcogrcccia (Basil. 1584), 
 and in Chytrai Orat. de ecd. gr. statu (Frcf. 1583). [Recently 
 Greek and Latin, in Kimmel, Libri symbolici ccdesice orientalis 
 (Jense 1843).] 
 
 The Calvinistic tendencies and efforts of Cyril Lucar gave 
 
 1 Eck's dry Loci Communes, to which Klee thinks every unprejudiced reader 
 must give the palm over Melanchthon's for learning, method, and dialectical 
 tact, I have not thought it necessary to quote. Klee's judgment must have 
 been written in the hope that no reader would compare the two books. 
 
 s Augusti, 2 Progrr. de nonnullis eccles. gr., quce nuper jactatce sunt, virtut., 
 Bonn 1821, with reference to Stourdza, Considerations sur la doctrine et I'esprit 
 de I'tglise orthodoxe, Stutt. 1816. The system of Greek doctrine is fully exhibited 
 in Heineccius, Abbild. der alien und neuern gr. K. As to the too highly esti- 
 mated coincidence between the East and West, see Leo Allatius, De ecc. occ. 
 atq. orient, perp. consens., Coin 1648. The harmony of Greek and Lutheran 
 dogmas is seen in Kohl, Ecdesia gr. lutheranizans, Lubec. 1723.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 1 3 
 
 occasion for a public Confession of the proper orthodox Greek 
 faith (a Confession fy e'8earo KOI Se^erai a7raa7r\<w<? Tracra, 
 17 avaroXi/crj eKK\r)(Tia, as the Synod of Jerusalem, 1672, 
 expressed it). This man, who became Patriarch first in 
 Alexandria and then in Constantinople, but in 1638 lost his 
 life by ecclesiastical visitation, acquired, through a residence in 
 Geneva, a strong preference for Calvinism, and drew up, in 
 conformity with the Eeformed doctrine, a confession of faith, 
 which was first published in Latin, 1629-1630, and then at 
 Geneva in Greek and Latin, 1633. In 1613, M. Caryo- 
 philus, Bishop of Iconium, published a reply. In 1638, a 
 Synod was held in Constantinople against Cyril Lucar, the 
 decrees of which were, together with the synodal document of 
 the Patriarch Parthenius, 1642 (Synod of Jassy), appended to 
 the edition of that Confession, Geneva 1645. It is found, 
 Greek and Latin, in Hottinger, Append, ad analect. hist, thcol. ; 
 Greek and French, in Aynion, Monumcns authentiques de la 
 religion des Grecs (La Haye, 1708); and Latin, in Corp. ct 
 Syntagma conf.fidei, 1654. 
 
 The genuine faith of the orthodox Greek Church was now 
 laid down in the 'Op#o8oo<? 6fjio\oyia TT)? KadoKiK^ KOI 
 aTToo-ToXt/d}? KK\T]ffia^ rrjs avaroXircfjs, drawn up by Petr. 
 Mogilas, Metropolitan of Kiew, primarily for the Eussian 
 Church. This was, in consequence of a conference between 
 Eussian and Constantinopolitan clergy, and after the revision 
 of Meletius Syrigus, accepted as an orthodox confession of 
 faith. It was issued in 1643 by the four Patriarchs, Par- 
 thenius of Constantinople, Joannicius of Alexandria, Macarius 
 of Antioch, and Parisius of Jerusalem, and others ; and it was 
 finally once more sanctioned by a Synod at Jerusalem, 1672. 
 It was originally printed only in the Eussian language ; the 
 first modern Greek edition appeared under the auspices of 
 Minsius, with a Latin translation and preface by the Jeru- 
 salem Patriarch Nectarius. This Confession divides into three 
 sections, which treat irepl TTiarrecos, Trepl e\7ri8o9, and irepl rfj? 
 et9 Oeov ical rov Tr\r)<riov ayairffr, and in the form of question 
 and answer. [Kimmel's work, already referred to, gives it in 
 Greek and Latin.] 
 
 At the Synod in Jerusalem, which was held under the
 
 14 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Patriarch Dositheus, a combination was formed for a new 
 vindication of the orthodox faith (ao^rt? opOoSogia?) against 
 Calvinism. The decrees are found in Harduin, Ada Cone, xi., 
 and embrace a Confession drawn up by Dositheus in eighteen 
 sections, which Harduin gives in Greek and Latin, but 
 Aymon in Greek and French. Its undeniable approximation 
 in many points to the Eoman doctrine has brought the Synod 
 under the suspicion of Latinizing, a suspicion which Tzschirner 
 has not succeeded in altogether removing (Schrockh, Kirchen- 
 gesch. n. d. Ref. ix. 9 1). 1 
 
 The following are private writings, but very useful : 
 1. The Confession (6/ioXoy/a rr t c dvaroX/x?;; ixxXjfffoc 7ijz za0oX/x5;; 
 xal affoffroX/xrjs In Icr/rc/i?;) of Metrophanes Critopulus, a Greek eccle- 
 siastic, born in Beraea, afterwards Patriarch in Alexandria, drawn 
 up in ancient Greek during a journey to Helmstadt in 1625. It 
 falls into twenty-three chapters. [Weissenborn has edited in his 
 Appendix librorum symbolicorum ecclesice orientalis, Jense 1850.] To 
 the same category belong, 2. The Ada et scripta iheol. Wirtemberg. et 
 patriarch. Const. D. Hieremice, qua utrique ab anno 1576 usque ad 
 1581 de August. Conf. inter se miserunt. They contain the Augsburg 
 Confession in Greek j then three documents of the Patriarch Jeremias, 
 wherein he criticises the doctrines of the Augsburg Confession, with 
 the answers of the Tubingen theologians ; and finally some letters of 
 the same Patriarch. 3. The Confession of the Moscow Metropolitan 
 Philarete (in Pinkerton's Russia). 
 
 2. Catechisms. 
 
 There are many of these, but not universally accepted. 
 The best known are Archbishop Plato's Orthodox Doctrine, or 
 Brief Summary of Christian Theology, drawn up primarily for 
 Prince Paul Petrowitzsch (1764 T). Plato leans, in the doctrine 
 of justification, and in many other dogmas, to a more decidedly 
 scriptural theory ; and many of the specific teachings of his 
 own Church he throws into the background. Peter the Great 
 
 1 The chief ground of suspicion was not its passing over the points of differ- 
 ence with the Romish Church, but the presentation of the dogmas themselves, 
 which, with their proofs, contain evident tendencies to Latinizing. I refer 
 only to the fact that the Apocrypha of the Old Testament are placed on a level 
 with the canonical books. In any case, the decrees of this Synod bear witness 
 to a further development and fuller definition of Greek orthodox dogmas.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 15 
 
 also commanded a catechism to be drawn up for the Eussian 
 youth, which was translated into German. 
 
 [The Confessions of the Greek Church are collected in Libri Sym- 
 lolici eccl. orientalis, E. J. Kimmel, Jena? 1843 ; with Appendix by 
 Weissenborn, 1850.] The most complete dogmatic handbook is Th. 
 Procopowicz, Christ, orthod. theologies, Regiom. 1773-1775. See, for 
 others, AValch, Bibl. theol. ii. 570. To these may be added Hyac. 
 Karpinski, Compend. orthod. theolog. doct., L. 1786. 
 
 III. EVANGELICAL (LUTHERAN) CHURCH* 
 1. Confessions. 
 
 Confessio Augustana. The Confession of Augsburg on the 
 basis of the seventeen articles of Torgau, 1529, which seem 
 to have been indistinguishable from the articles settled in the 
 Convent of Schwabach, 1529 was composed by Melanchthon, 
 and, in the name of the evangelical states of Germany, pre- 
 sented in German and Latin to the Emperor Charles v. at the 
 Diet of Augsburg on 25th June 1530. It consists of twenty- 
 one articles, which discuss the principal doctrines of theology 
 with reference to Eoman Catholic doctrine, briefly but suc- 
 cinctly ; and seven more which treat of the dbusus mutatos? 
 
 The first authorized and original edition was printed in 
 1530 at Wittenberg by G. Ehaw. It has, however, ordinarily 
 a common title, including the Apologia, and at the end of the 
 book stands, Impressum per G. Ehaw, 1531. The text is on 
 the title-page announced as ' deudsch und latinisch ; ' but in 
 many copies only the Latin text appears. I edited an im- 
 pression of the latter at Erlangen, 1825 ; and Tittmann one of 
 both texts at Dresden, 1830. It is not to be disguised that 
 the extant copies of this primary edition do not agree in all 
 places; the difference is more marked in the German text 
 than in the Latin ; and the whole state of things justifies the 
 
 1 [See "Walch, Introductio in Libras eccleswe Lutherane symbolicos, Jena 
 1732.] Feuerlein, Biblioth. syirib. ev. Luth., Wiirn 1768. 4 
 
 2 Cf. Chytrams, Hist, der A. C., Kostock 1576 ; Salig, VoUstand. Hist, der 
 A. C., Halle 1730; Planck, Gesch. d. protest. Lehrbegr. iii. 1.
 
 16 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 supposition that single sheets and pages were corrected before 
 the issue of the copies, and that Melanchthon took occasion 
 to amend certain places. This original edition must of course 
 in Symbolics be regarded as the authentic one, since the 
 originals of the Confession as presented to the Emperor are 
 not to be recovered ; while the copies which are found in 
 the libraries and archives of the evangelical states, and have 
 partly been printed, do not agree among themselves and with 
 that editio princeps, and may really be copies of the first 
 sketch of the Confession which Melanchthon copiously re- 
 vised before it was delivered. It was not his text of 1530 
 that was received into the German Concordicnbuch, but that 
 of the copy preserved in the imperial archives at Mayence, 
 although it has been since proved that this copy was not taken 
 from the original Confession. On the other hand, the second 
 edition of the Latin Concordia of 1584 has the text of the 
 editio princeps. Among the editions edited by Melanchthon 
 himself, the Latin one of 1540 is named the Variata, because 
 the author made alterations in the tenth article concerning 
 the Supper. 
 
 A confutation of the Confession of Augsburg (Confutatio 
 Aug. Confess?) was drawn up in Latin by a commission of 
 Eoman Catholic divines (among whom were Eck and Faber), 
 and read aloud in German in the Diet, August 3, 1530. But 
 no copy was given to the Protestant Estates. It appeared 
 first in Latin in A. Fabricii Harmonia Conf. A., Colon. 1573. 
 The German text was first edited by C. G. Mliller, from the 
 Mayence archives (Lips. 1808), with a Latin text from a 
 manuscript. Pfaff, Weber, and Hase printed this Confutation 
 in their editions of the symbolical books. This document 
 was met, on the part of the Protestants, by the Apologia Con- 
 fessionis Augustance, which also was drawn up by Melanchthon. 
 The first sketch of it, written on the basis of what was re- 
 membered of the Confutation as publicly read, was delivered 
 to the Emperor on 22d September 1530, but given back by 
 him. Melanchthon then finished the Apology on the basis of 
 a written copy of the Confutation ; and it appeared in Latin 
 and German (this latter translated by J. Jonas), just as we 
 now have it, in connection with the Confession itself. The
 
 INTRODUCTION. 17 
 
 octavo edition of 1531 contains a Latin text with variations, 
 which the learned have regarded as a counterpart of the 
 Confessio Variata, and termed Apologia, Variata. Melanchthon 
 follows in the Apology the order of the Confession, but some- 
 times groups several articles together when they deal with 
 one main topic ; and thus the opponents are refuted in sixteen 
 sections. 
 
 The Articles of Smalkald, Articuli Smalcaldici, were drawn 
 up in German by Luther, to be presented at the General Council 
 summoned by Paul in. in July 1536, and signed at Smal- 
 kald by an assembly of very many evangelical theologians 
 in February 1537. The first German edition appeared at 
 Wittenberg in 1538, revised in 1543 : the Latin, translated 
 by P. Generanus, was published in 1541 at the same place; 
 but it was a later translation that was received into the Latin 
 Concordienhich, that of K Selneccer (1579 and 1582). The 
 work consists of three parts : De summis articulis divinse 
 majestatis (4) ; De articulis qui officium et opus J. C. seu re- 
 demtionem nostram concernunt (4) ; Articuli de quibus agere 
 potuerimus cum doctis et prudentibus viris vel etiam inter nos 
 ipsos (1 5). To these articles there is appended now a treatise 
 of Melanchthon, De potestate et primatu Papse. It appeared at 
 first in Latin, without the author's name. Dietrich in 1541 
 published it in German with the name of Melanchthon. It 
 was taken into the Concordieribuch with the signatures of 
 many theologians. (Compare Bertram, Geschichte des symbol. 
 Anliangs der schmalk. A A. 1770.) 
 
 The Formula Concordice was based upon a formula of union 
 drawn up at Torgau in 1576. 1 It was composed in the 
 monastery of Bergen, near Magdeburg, in 1577, by six theo- 
 logians, Jac. Andrese, Mt. Chemnicius, Nic. Selneccer, Dav. 
 Chytreeus, And. Musculus, and Christ. Korner, and acquired 
 symbolical authority in Saxony, Weimar, Coburg, Wiirtem- 
 berg, Baden, Mecklenburg, Liibeck, Hamburg. On the other 
 hand, it was not accepted in Hesse, Anhalt, Pomerania, and 
 the free cities Frankfurt, Nuremberg, Magdeburg, Bremen, 
 Danzig. In the Palatinate and Brandenburg it was first 
 
 1 This formula was printed by Semler from a contemporary MS. under the 
 name of the Torgauisches Buck the Torgau Book. Halle, 1760. 
 
 B
 
 18 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 adopted, but afterwards rejected in consequence of a change of 
 confession. [Hutterus, Concordia concors. Francf. 1690; Chem- 
 nicii Examen cone. Trid. ed. E. Preuss, Berolini 1861.] The 
 language originally was German ; it was translated into Latin 
 by Luc. Osiander, and in this form was taken into the Latin 
 Liber Concordice. The editio princeps of the German Formula 
 is that of the German ConcordieribucJi, Dresd. 1580. The 
 whole falls into two parts, an epitome and a solida declaratio : 
 the former, the Epitome, treats more briefly, the latter more 
 fully, all contested dogmas. First the point of dispute is ex- 
 hibited, then the doctrine of the evangelical Church is laid 
 down (affirmatives), and finally the false positions of oppo- 
 nents are refuted by arguments (negativa). 
 
 2. Catechisms} 
 
 The Catechismus Major and Catechismiis Minor (Enchiri- 
 dion) were both issued by Luther, 1529; the larger first in 
 quarto, the smaller afterwards in octavo. Their matter is 
 distributed into five sections : Decalogue, Apostles' Creed, the 
 Lord's Prayer, Baptism, and the Eucharist. The larger Cate- 
 chism contained in the second edition of 1529 an instruction 
 and exhortation to confession (whether Luther's is doubtful). 
 The smaller was, in the oldest German edition, 1529 pro- 
 bably the second provided with forms of prayer, daily watch- 
 words, marriage and baptismal chapters, short instructions as 
 to the manner of confession, etc. These additions were taken 
 up into the first authentic edition of the German Concordien- 
 Twch. The section on confession appears in a Latin edition of 
 1532 to be enlarged into a catechization on confession, and 
 takes its place immediately after the chapter on baptism. A 
 special section on the power of the keys was not added by 
 Luther to either of the editions published by himself. But 
 as early as the third decennium of the sixteenth century this 
 is found in various editions of the smaller Catechism ; and 
 from 1531 it was made in Nuremberg matter of preaching. 
 Whence came this article, reproducing as it does Luther's 
 
 1 Cf. August! Verswh einer liistor.-krit. EinUitung in die beiden Hattptkate- 
 chismcn der ev. K., Elberfeld 1824.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 1 9 
 
 ideas, and in part his words, can only be conjectured ; but, as 
 this subject has no symbolic importance, it does not lie within 
 our plan to investigate it further. The larger Catechism was 
 in 1529 put into Latin by Lonicer; this was revised by Sel- 
 neccer, and in this form entered the Concordienbuch. The 
 smaller Catechism appeared in Latin, 1529, at Wittenberg. 
 The translator is not known, though some think him- Justus 
 Jonas. (See Illgen, Memoria utriusgue catech. Ituth.,IAps. 1829.) 
 The collective symbolical documents of the Lutheran Church 
 were called the Concordienbuch (Concordia, Liber Concordice, 
 Book of Concord). It was issued in German at the command 
 of the Elector Augustus in Dresden 1580, and often after- 
 wards: the Latin was by N". Selneccer, Lips. 1580. The 
 most important Latin editions are those of Eechenberg, Leipz. 
 1678; Pfaff, Tub. 1730; Tittmann, Meissen 1827; Hase, 
 Leipz. 1827, Berlin 1857. The German Concordienbuch was 
 edited by S. J. Baumgarten, Halle 1747. [Eeineccius pub- 
 lished it in German and Latin at Leipsig 1708, Walch at 
 Jena in 1750, and Miiller at Stuttgart in I860. 1 ] 
 
 [The same doctrine as that contained in the Concordienbuch may 
 be found in sundry other corpora doctrince, of which the three most 
 important are: 1. The Corpus Doctrines Prutenicum, or Repetitio 
 Doctrines ecclesiastics, Konigsb. 1567 ; 2. The Corpus Doctrines Thu- 
 ringicum, or Corpus Doctrince Christiana;, Jena 1570 ; 3. The Corpus 
 Doctrines Julium, Heinrichstadt 1576.] 
 
 Among particular Provincial Confessions may be mentioned: 1. 
 The Confessio Ecclesiarum Saxonicarum, prepared for the Council of 
 Trent, under the direction of the Elector Maurice, by Melanchthon, 
 1551. From the original in the library of the Thomaskirche at 
 Leipzig. J. Quodvultdeus Burger edited this in 1722 ; it is found 
 also in Melanch. Opera, i. 121 ; in Chytrsei Hist, Conf. Aug. 2. The 
 Confessio Wirtembergica (Suevica) was drawn up with the same de- 
 sign by J. Brenz, at the request of Duke Christopher, and on 24th 
 Jan. 1552 given in to the Council of Trent. It treats in its thirty- 
 five articles of many points passed over or lightly indicated in the 
 
 1 Under the title Libri Ecclesice Dan. symbolici a book has appeared, containing 
 the three (Ecumenical Councils, the Conf. August., and Luther's Smaller Cate- 
 chism, edited by J. C. Lindberg. (The Confess. Ham., drawn up in forty- 
 three articles, 1530, and presented to King Frederic I., is to be regarded as 
 superseded by the A. C. It was published in Danish and Latin by "Woldiche, 
 Kopen. 1736.)
 
 20 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 other Confessions : e.g. the Sacrament of Confirmation, and Extreme 
 Unction, Fasting, Benedictions, the Authority of Councils. It was 
 published in German in 1552, as also in Latin. 3. The Confessio 
 Bohemica, or the confession of faith of the Lutherans and Moravian 
 Brethren in Bohemia, drawn up in 1575, and published at Amberg 
 in German, 1609. To be distinguished from this is the Conf. Bohe- 
 mica received into the second part of the Corpus et Syntagma, which 
 the Moravian Brethren alone presented to the Emperor Charles v., 
 1535, and has often appeared in German. (See Walch, Bill. Theol. 
 i. 401, and Baumgarten, Erlceut. der symb. Schr. S. 247.) 1 4. The 
 Articles of Visitation, which were drawn up under the Saxon Admi- 
 nistrator Fr. William in 1592, in order to extirpate Crypto-Calvinism ; 
 even the Professors in Saxony having been bound by it. [Printed 
 first in 1593. They appear in the beginning of the older Saxon 
 editions of the Concordienbuch.'] Cf. Walch, Bibl. Theol. i. 398. 
 
 [The most important works of Lutheran theologians in defence 
 of their doctrine are: Martini Chemnicii Examen concilii Tridentini 
 (ed. pr. Frankf. 1566 ; last edited by E. Preuss, 1862, with a triple 
 Appendix and Indexes); the Loci Theologici of the same author, 
 Frankf. 1591 ; and Gerhard, Loci Theologici, Jena 1610 (by E. Preuss, 
 Berlin 1863). For the illustration of points only indicated in the 
 Symbolical Books, it is well to consult Hutter, Compendium locorum 
 theologicorum, Vitembergae 1610 (by Twesten, Berlin 1863). J 
 
 IV. THE KEFORMED CHUECIL 
 1. Confessions. 
 
 A collection of Reformed Confessions (with some Lutheran 
 included) appeared at Geneva under the title, Corpus et Syn- 
 tagma Confessionum fidei qua in diversis regnis et nationibus 
 ecclesiarum nomine fuerunt authentice editce (AureL Allobrog. 
 1612; second and enlarged edition, 1654). 2 The Confessio 
 Marchica was not included in the last edition. Before this 
 there had been issued a combination of symbolical dogmas 
 drawn from the Reformed Confessions, and the Confessions of 
 
 1 The little work which appeared under the title Confessio fidei Suecance in 
 cone. Upsal. 1593, contains only three (Ecumenical Symbols and the Aug. 
 Conf. 
 
 * The Latin Conf. of Cyril Lucar, and the Canons of Dort, are included in the 
 last edition. "We have printed the passages of the Eefoimed Symbols from 
 this edition.
 
 INTRODUCTION.' 21 
 
 Augsburg, Wiirtemberg, and Bohemia, as Harmonia Confes- 
 sionum fidei orthodoxarum ct reform, eccles., in nineteen sec- 
 tions (Geneva, 15 8 1). 1 Eecently, however, the following 
 collections and translations of the Eeformed Symbols have 
 appeared : Corpus librorum symbol, qui in eccles. reform, autori- 
 tatem pull, dbtinuerunt, cura J. C. A. Augusti, Elberfeld 1827 
 (this contains also the Dort Canons, the Heidelberg and 
 Geneva Catechism, and the March. Confessions, but is uncriti- 
 cal, and in a high degree incorrect) ; Confessions de foi des 
 eglises reformats de, France, et de Sitisse, Montpellier 1826 
 (containing only the Conf. Gall, Helv. IL, and the Thirty-nine 
 Articles, of the English Church) ; Sammlung synib. Sucker dcr 
 Rcf. K., edited by Mess, Neuwied 1830 ; the Symbolical Books 
 translated from the Latin, Neustadt. [Collectio confessiomim 
 in ecclesiis reformatis publicatarum, ed. H. A. Niemeyer, lips. 
 1840, contains thirty-one Confessions on 1 5 pages. Finally : 
 Bockel, Bckcnntnissschriften der ev. rcf. K. t Leipzig 1847.] 
 The individual Confessions will now be arranged in periods: 
 
 a. Before Calvin, or apart from his influence. 
 
 The Confessio Tetrapolitana (also Argentinensis or Suevica), 
 the Confession of the four cities Strassburg, Constance, Mem- 
 mingen, and Landau, all disposed towards the Zwinglian 
 sacramental doctrine. It was drawn up by M. Bucer, and 
 presented in Latin and German to the Emperor Charles v. at 
 Augsburg, 1530. It appeared in print at Strassburg, both in 
 German and in Latin; and consists of twenty-three articles, 
 of which eighteen present a view of the Supper somewhat 
 deviating from that of the Augsburg Confession (cf. Planck, 
 Prof. Lelirb. iii. 1. 83). With the title Conf. Argentinensis it 
 appears in the Latin of the Corp. et Syntagma [and as Con- 
 fessio Tetrapolitana in Niemeyer] ; the Confutatio which the 
 Emperor procured in opposition to it was first printed in 
 MtiUer's edition of the Conf. A. C., Lips. 1808. See Werns- 
 dorf, Hist. Conf. Tetrap., Viteb. 1721; Pels, de Varid Conf. 
 Tdrap. fortund, Gbttingen 1755. 
 
 1 The editors of the two collections have suppressed their names. The Harm. 
 Conf. is thought to have been drawn up by Beza, and the Corp. and Syntagma 
 by Caspar and Aurentius.
 
 22 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Ulr. Zwingli ad Carol. Imp.fidci ratio, 30th July 1530, has 
 remained a private document : it was presented to the Em- 
 peror at the Diet in Augsburg, and consisted of twelve articles. 
 Eck prepared in three days an answer to this. Zwingle's 
 Christiance fidei brevis et clara expositio was held by the Swiss 
 in higher estimation than the former Confession, but still with- 
 out symbolical authority : it was drawn up in eleven sections ; 
 from the original Latin it passed into the German of Leo Judae 
 1535, and is found in Zwingle's Opp. ii. 550. [The Latin is 
 in Niemeyer.] 
 
 The Confessio Basileensis (Miilhusana), 1534, the Confes- 
 sion of Basle, was published there under the title, Bekantnv.s 
 unsers heylig. christl. Glaubens, wie es die Kylch zu Basel haldt. 
 It is thought to have been drawn up by Oswald Myconius after 
 a project of QEcolampadius, and contains twelve articles. 
 Miihlhausen adopted this Confession, and it was printed there 
 in 1537. The Latin appears in the Corp. et Syntagma [and 
 both Latin and German in Niemeyer]. 
 
 The Confessio Helvetica I., drawn up at Basel by appointed 
 theologians of the towns of Zurich, Bern, Basel, Schaffhausen, 
 St. Gallen, Miihlhausen, Biel, that is, by Bullinger, Myconius, 
 Grynseus, Leo Judae, and Grossmann, was accepted and signed by 
 those cantons and towns, and sent also to the Lutheran divines 
 assembled at Smalkald in 1537. It consists of twenty-seven 
 articles ; appeared first in Latin, and afterwards in a German 
 translation of Leo Judse, 1536, 1587. It is in the first part 
 of the Corp. et Syntagma [and in Niemeyer, Latin and German]. 
 
 The WdhrJiaft Belcenntniss der Diencr dcr Kirche zu Ziirch, 
 was sie aus Gottes Wort mit dcr heil. christl. Kirche glaulen 
 und lehren, insonderlich von dem Naclitmald unsers Herrn, etc., 
 contains the genuine Zwinglian doctrine of the Eucharist. 
 
 (3. After Calvin ; under his influence or supervision. 
 
 The Consensio mutua in re sacramentarid ministror. Tigur. et J. 
 Calvini, drawn up in 1549, and consisting of twenty-six articles, 
 was intended to effect a mediation between the Ziirich-Zwing- 
 lian and the Genevese-Calvinian doctrine of the Supper. It is 
 printed in Calvin's Opp. viii. 648, and in his Tractatus Thco- 
 logici (Gen. 1611), and separately in 1564 by Eobert Stephens.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 23 
 
 There was another Consensus : DC ceternd Dei prcedestina- 
 tione, qua, in salutem olios ex hominibus elegit, olios suo eoritio 
 reliquit, item de providentid qua res humanas gubemat, consen- 
 sus pastomm Genemnsis ecclesice a J. Calvino expositus, Genev. 
 1552. According to Planck, Lehrbeg. vii. 805, whom Mar- 
 heinecke follows, this Consensus was accepted by Ziirichers, 
 1 5 44, and under the title Consensus Tigurinorum is found in 
 Calvini Opusc. p. 754. By this title only the seventh volume 
 of Calvin's works, which contains the Tract. Theolog., is known 
 to me, and I find there the Consensio mutua in re, sacramen- 
 tarid. That statement, therefore, might rest on an error. 
 Esscher also knew nothing of any Consensus de prcedestinatione 
 on the part of the Ziirichers. 
 
 The Confessio Gallicana was drawn up (by Calvin ?) in forty 
 articles, accepted by a Synod in Paris, 1559, in 1560 pre- 
 sented to Francis n. of France, and once more to King Charles 
 ix. in 1561. At a Synod in Eochelle, 1571, it was con- 
 firmed anew, and found approval and acceptance also beyond 
 France. In its Latin form (1566) it was printed in the Com- 
 ment, de, statu rel. et reipubl. in regno Gallice (1571), as also in 
 the Corp. et Syntagma; in its French form it was printed in 
 Beza's Histoire eccles. des eglises reform, au royaume de France, 
 ii. 173. An original of the French is in the State archives 
 of Geneva. 
 
 Separate from this, and by no means a translation of it, is 
 the Confession und Kurze BcJcanntnuss des Glaubens die reform. 
 Kirchen in Frankreich, Heidelb. 1566. It was intended to 
 be presented to Maximilian n., 1564, and the Estates of the 
 German Empire at the Diet in Frankfurt ; but the war pre- 
 vented the accomplishment of this purpose. It is specially 
 full on the doctrine of the Eucharist. The Latin (from the 
 French original) is in Calv. Opp. viii., and in the Tractatus 
 Theol. Omnes, p. 107. 
 
 The Articuli xxxix. Eccles. Anglicance the Thirty-nine 
 Articles of the Church of England on the basis of the forty 
 articles drawn up in Edward the Sixth's reign (by Cranmer 
 and Eidley, 1551), were fixed under Queen Elizabeth, 1562, 
 and formally accepted by the Episcopal Church at a Synod in 
 London. Comp. Burnet, On the Articles.
 
 24 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 The Scoticana Confessio fidci, in twenty-five articles, had for 
 its chief author John Knox. It tends in a marked manner 
 towards Calvin's doctrine, yet more in the sacramental dogma 
 than in that of predestination. In the Corp. et Syntagma [and 
 in Niemeyer also] the so-called negative Confession of 1581 is 
 included. 1 
 
 The Westminster Confession is perfectly distinct from the old 
 Scottish. It was drawn up by a convention of theologians, 
 under the authority of Parliament, termed the Westminster 
 Assembly, 1643-1648, and has in Scotland symbolical 
 authority. 
 
 The Confessio Hungarica or Czcngerina, drawn up by a 
 Synod of Hungarian Eeformers in 1557 or 1558, consists of 
 eleven articles. It is found in the Corp. et Syntagma, i. 148 
 [and in Memeyer, 539-550]. 
 
 The Confessio Bclgica, in thirty-seven articles, was originally 
 a private document of Guido v. Bres, and printed in French, 
 1562. It presently appeared in Dutch, and attained during 
 the sixteenth century general acceptance on the part of the 
 Netherlands congregations, and the signatures even of many 
 princes. At the Synod of Dort it was, after a revision of the 
 text, publicly confirmed. 2 The most complete edition, with 
 polemical remarks, is that of Festus Homm, Leiden 1618. 
 It is found also in Corpus et Syntagma, in the Actis Synodi 
 Dordr., under the 1 46th session. Since the Dort Synod the text 
 has been firmly fixed. It was edited in Greek (by Eevius), 
 with Latin text, Leiden 1623, and Amsterdam 1638. 
 
 The Confessio Helvetica n. was drawn up by Bullinger, at 
 
 1 This was mainly directed against Roman Catholicism, and couched in the 
 most vehement terms, being in this respect very similar to the Smalkald Articles. 
 The decrees of the Council of Trent are termed erronea et sanguinolenta, and 
 rejected cum omnibus subscriptoribus et approbatoribus crudelia et sanguinei illius 
 fcederis conjurati cotitra del ecclesiam. 
 
 2 The judgment of the Remonstrants on this point, Apol. Confess. Hem., 
 was very vigorous. They who attentively read it will find strong reason for 
 thinking that it was written by some individual hastily, without much judg- 
 ment, or the serious scrutiny of others, and therefore for doubting whether such 
 a document ought to be regarded as expressing the mind of a whole community. 
 Adr. Saravia says that it was first written by Guido von Bres, communicated to 
 a few here and there, and, without any very solemn examination or approbation 
 of any synod, gradually passed into use as a formula of the churches.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 25 
 
 the request of Frederick in., Elector of the Palatinate, in 
 1564. It was issued in the Latin original, 1566, and in a 
 German translation by the author himself, having been often re- 
 printed, alone and in collections. It contains thirty chapters, 
 and was held in the very highest esteem among the Confes- 
 sions of the Eeformed Church, not only in Switzerland, but 
 in the Palatinate and in Scotland, as well as in the Polish, 
 Hungarian, and even the French, Eeformed Churches. A 
 French translation by Beza appeared at Geneva in 1566. 
 
 The Confessio fidei Friderici ill. Elector. Palat. was pub- 
 lished at the request of his successor, the Elector John 
 Casimir, 1577, and is found under the Latin title, Confessio 
 Palatini, in the Corpus et Syntagma. Other Palatinate Con- 
 fessions (of theologians) see in Walch, Biblioth. Theol. i. 421. 
 
 The Repetitio brevis, simplex et perspicua orthodoxce Confes- 
 sionis, guam amplectuntur ecclesice principatus AnJialt., Neap. 
 Casimir, 1581, was drawn up, according to the advertisement 
 of the publisher, in a theological assembly at Cassel in March 
 1859. It consists of eleven articles. The latest separate 
 edition is, Das Bekennt. der Anhalt landesk., or Repetitio Anhal- 
 tina, by Valentiner, Bernburg 1859. 
 
 The Confessio JSrandenburgica, drawn up under the direc- 
 tion of the Prince John Sigismund (mainly by Mt. Fiissel), 
 appeared in 1614 by the title, Des Iwchgeborn. Filrst. JoTi. Sig. 
 Bekdnndniss von jetzigen unter den Evangelischen scwebenden u. 
 in Streitgezogenen Punkten. It contains sixteen articles, and 
 must be distinguished from the Confession of the Eeformed 
 Churches in Germany, which the same Prince caused to be 
 published at Frankfurt-on-the-Oder in 1614, already printed, 
 it is thought, before the end of the sixteenth century in South 
 Germany. Combined with the Colloq. lips, of 1631, the Decla- 
 ratio Thorun. of 1645, it appeared with the title, The Three 
 Confessions. The three documents appear as an appendix 
 in Hering's Hist. Nachricht, Halle 1778. [Niemeyer has 
 the three.] The Declaration of Thorn is cited below as it is 
 printed in Hering. 
 
 The Decrees of the Synod of Dort during 154 sessions, 
 from 13th November 1618 to 9th May 1619 are printed 
 in Latin in the Acta Synodi national, in nomine J. C. autor.
 
 26 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ordinum general, fcedcrat. Bdgii pror. Dordrccliti habitcc, 1620. 
 They were published also apart by the title, Judicium si/nodi 
 nation. Lord. 1619. The Calvinistic dogma of election is 
 laid down in all its strictness as the orthodox faith. The 
 Netherlands, most of the Swiss cantons, the Ehenish Pala- 
 tinate, the French churches, and the Puritans in England, 
 accepted these canons. The English Episcopal Church, how- 
 ever, in fact renounced them ; and the Brandenburg Church 
 took no part in the Synod. 
 
 The Formula Consensus ecclcs. Helveticarum reform, circa 
 doct. de gratia univ. et connexa aliaq. nonnulla capita was 
 drawn up, 1674, against the specific doctrine of Particularism 
 which appeared in the Eeformed Church, by J. H. Heidegger, 
 Professor in Zurich, and printed in German and Latin, Ziirich 
 1675. It consists of twenty-six articles, and was accepted 
 by Zurich, Berne, Basel, Schaffhausen, Glarus, Appenzell, S. 
 Gallen, Miihlhausen, Biel, Neufchatel ; later also by Geneva 
 and, with certain limitations, by Lausanne. But dissensions 
 were soon excited by it throughout the Swiss churches, as 
 the consequence of which, and about the beginning of the 
 eighteenth century, this Consensus gradually lost its symbo- 
 lical importance. Compare Hottinger, Succincta ac gcnuina 
 formulae consensus Hclv. historia; and Pfaff, Schediasma de 
 form, consens. Hclv., Tubing. 1723, where the Formula itself 
 is printed, which has also been often printed alone, and as 
 appendix to the Conf. Helv. IL 
 
 2. Catechisms* 
 
 The Heidelberg Catechism Catcchismus Heidelberg ensis s. 
 Palatinus was composed by Olevianus and Ursinus, at the 
 command of the Elector Frederick ill., in 1562, translated by 
 Lagus and Pithopceus into Latin, and then published both in 
 Latin and German (Christliche Underricht wie der in Kirchen 
 und Schulen der churf. Pfalz getrieben wirdt}, Heidelb. 1563. 
 The German text is reckoned the authentic one, and has often 
 been republished. It has been translated into many lan- 
 guages, even into Spanish, 1628, and in every kind of way 
 1 Cf. J. C. Koclier, Catech. Hist, der rcf. KircJie, Jen. 175G.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 27 
 
 has been commented on. It consists of three main divisions : 
 1. The miserable estate of man ; 2. Redemption from that 
 state ; 3. Gratitude for that redemption. It is divided into 
 129 questions, distributed over 52 Sundays: of these ques- 
 tions, the 80th and the most celebrated was omitted in many 
 editions through unevangelical respect for man. The Synod 
 of Dort approved it, sess. 148. 1 See Von Alpen's Gesch. u. 
 liter, des Heid. Cat., Frankf. 1810; [Hasse, Nachrichten ueber 
 die Verf., die Entstch., u. Verbr. des Heid. Cat., Mors 1863.] 
 
 The Catechismus Ecclesice Genevensis, 1545, by Calvin; in 
 French earlier, 1541. (Calvin had in 1536 published a 
 book of instruction for youth in French, and 1538 in Latin.) 
 It contains four divisions (of Faith, Law of God, Prayer, 
 Sacraments), is distributed over fifty-five Sundays, and was 
 esteemed especially in France. It appeared in German, 
 Heidelberg 1563. The Latin text is in the Calv. Opp. viii. 
 
 The Catechismus Tigurinus was collected from the Cate- 
 chisms of Leo Judse (1554) and Bullinger (1559), and in 
 1609 brought to its present settled form. It consists of four 
 divisions and one hundred and ten questions, distributed over 
 forty-eight Sundays. 
 
 The Church Catechism, prepared under Edward vi., and first 
 printed in English and Latin 1553, was revised by Nowell, 
 1572, and accepted by the English Episcopal Church. It 
 falls into four sections. The Puritan Westminster Confession 
 has also a twofold Catechism appended to it. [See Appendix 
 collectionis Confessionum in ecclesiis reformatis puUicatarum, 
 ed. Niemeyer, Lipsiae 1840.] 
 
 The Catechesis Bdgica, connected with the Confessio Belgica, 
 is by many regarded as a specific Belgian Catechism. But it 
 is, as Kb'cher has shown, no other than the Heidelberg Cate- 
 chism. It was first translated into Dutch in 1568. 
 
 1 Declaratum fuit, consentientibus omnium tarn exterorum quam Belgic. 
 theologorum suffragiis, doctrinam in catechesi Palat. compreliensam verbo Dei 
 in omnibus esse ccnsentientem ncque ea quidquam contineri, quod ut minus 
 eidein consentaneum mutari aut corrigi debere videretur cet.
 
 28 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 THE AlJMINIANS. 1 
 
 1. Confessions. 
 
 Remonstrantia, libellus supplcx cxhibitus Hollandice et West- 
 frisice Ordinibus, 1610. They are five articles, in which the 
 Dutch advocates of universal redemption just briefly expressed 
 their faith. In the Scriptis advers. collation. Hag. they stand 
 at the head. They have also been often reprinted. Walch, 
 Edigion streitigk. ausser der Luther. K. iii. 540. 
 
 Confessio seu Declaratio sententice Pastomm, qui in ftzdcrato 
 Bclgio Remonstrantes vocantur, super prcecip. articulis rel. Christ, 
 Harderov. 1622 (Simon. Episcop. Opp. ii. 69). It consists 
 of twenty-six chapters, and its author was Simon Episcopius 
 (t 1643). The first edition is said to have appeared in Latin 
 and Dutch as early as 1621 (cf. Limborch, Vita Episcop. 
 279), the Dutch having preceded (Brandt, Hist, der Refor- 
 matie, iv. 648). Uytenbogard is, however, stated to be the 
 Dutch translator; consequently the Latin was the original 
 text. Against four professors in Leyden, Polyander, Eivetus, 
 Walceus, and Thysius, who had issued a Censura in confess. 
 Remonst., Episcopius wrote his Apologia pro confcssione seu dc- 
 claratione sententice, 1630. Many polemical treatises followed 
 on both sides, especially Sim. Episcopii Verus tlieologus remon- 
 strans (Opp. ii 508). 
 
 Scripta adversaria collationis Hagiensis habitce anno 1611 
 de Divind prcedestinatione et capitibus ei annexis, L. B. 1616. 
 The translation was by Bertius ; for these records of the Hague 
 Conference had been published before in Dutch. The most 
 important thing in them is the defence of the five articles. 
 Epistola ecclesiastarum, quos in Belgio Remonstrantes vacant, ad, 
 cxterarum cedes, reform, doctores ccet. qua sententiam suam de 
 prcedestinatione ccet. exponunt, L. B. 1617. This epistle, indi- 
 cating the opinions of the Remonstrants, was drawn up by 
 Barlaeus. Acta et Scripta synodalia Dordracena ministror. re- 
 monstrant., Herderwici 1620. 
 
 1 Cf. Franke, De Historla dogmalum Arminianorum, Xil. 1814.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 29 
 
 2. Catechisms. 
 
 Ondenvysinge in de christ. Religie Instructions in the Chris- 
 tian Ecligion, given in question and answer, according to the 
 Confessions of the Remonstrant Reformed Christians, Eotterd. 
 1644. The author is supposed to have been Uytenbogard. A 
 shorter text-book is : Ondenvys in de christ. Rel., by Earth. 
 Prsevostius. This appeared, in a revised form, at Amsterdam 
 in 1733. 
 
 The most important dogmatic writings of the theologians of this 
 community are : Sim. Episcopii Institutt. theol. libb. 4 (this was only half 
 finished, including in Christology only the chapter on Redemption); 
 Steph. Curcellsei (f 1659) Institutio rel. Christ, libb. 7 (this also is 
 incomplete); Ph. a Limborch (f!712), Theologia Christiana, Amst. 
 1686, 1730; Adr. a Cattenburg, Spicilegium theol. christ. Phil, a 
 Limborch, Amst. 1726. Especially Jac. Arminii (f 1609) Opera 
 theol., L. B. 1609 (Frankf. 1635), contain dogmatic treatises on the 
 chief dogmas oa which the Arminian differs from the Calvinistic 
 faith. 
 
 V. BAPTISTS (ANABAPTISTS, MENNONITES). 
 1. The Older Anabaptists at the Time of the Reformation. 
 
 Their doctrinal positions are briefly, and of course with a 
 polemical bearing, exhibited by Melanchthon, Vorlegung etlichcr 
 unchr. Artik. welche die Wiedertdufer vorgcben, in Luther's Ger- 
 man works ; and in Menius, Dcr Wiedertdufer Lchre widerlcgt. 
 Compare Form. cone. p. 622. 
 
 2. Mennonites. 
 
 (Herm. Schyn, Hist. Christ, qui in Belgi fcederato Men- 
 nonitce appellantur, AmsteL 1723, and Hist. Menu, plenior 
 deductio, 1729. Hunzinger, Das rel. Kirch, u. Schulwesen der 
 M., Speier 1831.) 
 
 a. Confessions (Schyn, Plen. Deduct, c. iv.). 
 Their number is tolerably large, but they have not reached 
 any general importance ; and there are many differences among
 
 30 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 them, as this party have never been consistent in their doc- 
 trinal opinions. 
 
 Korte Belydenisse des Geloofs, or Prcecipuorum Christiana 
 fidei articulorum brevis Confessio, was prepared in 1580 by J. 
 Eis (Hans de Eis) and L. Gerardi. It was turned into Latin in 
 Schyn, Histor. Menn. It consists of forty articles, and exhibits 
 the common faith of the Waterlandian congregations : cf. Schyn, 
 PL Ded. 280. Besides this, Schyn gives prominence to five 
 Confessions, which the United Flemings, Frisians, and Germans 
 in 1665 issued : De algemeene Belydenissen der vereenighdc VI. , 
 Vr.y en ffooghd. Doopgesinde Gemeynte. First, the articles of 
 faith which had been formulated on 1st May 1591 ; secondly, 
 the Bekdnntniss vom einigen Gott., etc., 1628, whose author 
 was Ontermann ; thirdly, the Chr. Geloofsbefyd. des Olyf-Tacx 
 (ramus olivce), 1629 ; fourthly, the Brevis Confessio of the 
 united Frisian and German Baptists, 1630 (drawn up, it is 
 said, by J. Centzen) ; and, fifthly, Voorstell. van de princ. artic., 
 consisting of a Confession, in fifteen articles, drawn up by A. 
 Cornells. There was, sixthly, a Confession accepted at Leyden, 
 1664, by Flemish, Frisian, and German divines, which ap- 
 peared in the same year at Amsterdam ; seventhly, an evan- 
 gelical Confession of the Baptists as preached and taught at 
 Altona, by Eoose ; and, eighthly, Eis' Glaulenslehre der wahren 
 Mennoniten, which was drawn up in 1765, and in 1766 was 
 published in Dutch at Hoorn. It obtained in 1773 the 
 approval of many churches, and appeared with their sanction 
 expressed, Hamburg 1776. 
 
 As to some protocols, the result of religious conversations 
 and discussions between the Mennonites and the Eeformed 
 theologians, at Frankenthal in 1571, and Linden in 1578, 
 and Leuwarden in 1597, see Schyn, who gives extracts, and 
 Kocher, p. 461. A private document, but one very useful, is 
 the so-called Hornische BeTcenntniss, a Confession written at 
 Hoorn, 1618, in thirty-three articles, which Schyn, Plen. De- 
 duct. 295, ascribes to P. J. Twisk, a very prolific Mennonite 
 author, who died in 1636. 
 
 . Catechisms. 
 
 Kort Onderwys, or Instruction drawn up by the appoint-
 
 INTRODUCTION". 3 1 
 
 ment of a Synod in Amsterdam, in 1697, by A. A. Dooregest, 
 P. Beets, and H. Schyn, and, when approved by the Synod, 
 printed at Amsterdam in 1697, and again in 1723. It con- 
 sists of twenty-eight chapters. H. Schyn arranged an extract: 
 see his Plen. Ded. 361. Other Mennonite Catechisms are 
 mentioned by Kocher, Bill, syrrib. i. 647 ; Walch, Bill. TJieol. 
 i. 547. Most complete is reckoned that of, P. Baudouin, 
 Haarlem, published in Dutch in that town, 1743. I have 
 never seen this. Hunzinger alludes to Chrisll. Gemuthsge- 
 sprdcli von clem gdstl. u. seligm. Glaule, 1783, in twenty-four 
 articles, and one hundred and forty-eight questions and answers, 
 with a smaller Catechism appended, as the most extensively 
 used handbook of Christian instruction. 
 
 3. TJie Baptists in England and America. 
 
 These are represented by two Confessions : the one, that of 
 the Particular Baptists, was drawn up in 1689, and consists 
 of thirty-two chapters ; the other, that of the General Baptists, 
 dates from the year 1691, and embraces twenty-seven chap- 
 ters. Other older Confessions of this community may be seen 
 in Crosby's History of the English Baptists, Lond. 1738. 
 
 VI. THE SociNiANS. 1 
 1. Confessions. 
 
 Confcssio fid. Christ, edita nomine ecclesiarum guce in Polor.id 
 unum Deum ct Filium ejus unigenitum J. C. et Sp. S. corde sando 
 profitcntur per divince veritatis confessionem, 1642. This Soci- 
 nian Confession was composed by J. Schlichting in the form 
 
 1 Cf., for the Socinian literature generally, C. Sand, BibUoth. Antlirln., Frey- 
 stadb (Amst.) 1684. Bock, Historia Antitrin. maxime Socianianismi et Sod- 
 nianorum, Eegiom. 1714-1784. As to the substance and matter of it, Flatt's 
 Beilrarje zur christ. Dogma, Tub. 1792 ; Bengel, in Siiskind's Mag. fur Dogma; 
 Kaiser, Pr. de Elhice eccl. Socin. syml). ad symbol proteslant. elhicen com- 
 parata, Erlangen 1836. [O. Fock, Der Socinianismus nach seiner stellung in 
 der GesammiwicMung des chrisll. Gentes, nach s. hist. Vf.rla.vf u. nach s. Lehr- 
 begrif daraestellt, Kiel 1847.]
 
 32 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 of an exposition of the Apostles' Creed, with plentiful scrip- 
 tural demonstrations. It appeared in French, 1646, and in 
 Polish the same year. The latter translation was, under the 
 direction of the Diet, burnt by the common executioner. An 
 enlarged and improved edition of the Latin appeared in 1651, 
 and a defence of it against N. Cichovius in 1652, both from 
 the same Schlichting. Besides these there is a French trans- 
 lation of 1642, a Dutch of 1652, and a German of 1653 by 
 J. Felbinger. In this Confession the deviations of the Soci- 
 nians from the universal Christian faith are exhibited with far 
 less completeness and decisiveness than in the Catechism pre- 
 sently to be named. The Confession of the Prussian Socinians, 
 which they presented in 1666 to their sovereign, is only an 
 extract from the former. See Bock, Historia Socinianismi 
 Prussici (Regiom. 1754). 
 
 ' 
 
 2. Catechisms. 
 
 (Catechesis et Confessio fidei coetus per Polon. congregati in 
 nomine Domini J. C. Domini nostri crucifixi et resuscitati, 
 Cracov. 1574. The author of this Catechism was G. Scho- 
 niann, Socinian preacher in Cracow, f 1591. The answers 
 are usually given in scriptural language.) 
 
 Fausti Socini (|1604) Christiana rel. brevissima Institutio 
 per interrogationes et responsiones, quam catecliismum vulgo vacant, 
 Eacov. 1618. This is Bibl.fratrum Polonorum, i. 651, a frag- 
 ment which includes only the doctrines concerning God and 
 Christ. 
 
 The Smaller Catechism, for the discipline of children in 
 divine service, written in Polish and German, Rakau 1605, 
 was also published in Latin with the title, Brevis Institutio 
 rclig. Christiancc, 1629. 
 
 The latter Socinian Catechism, constructed by V. Schmalz, 
 a Socinian preacher who died in 1622, and Hieron. Moscoro- 
 vius, a Polish nobleman who died in 1625, on the basis of 
 the Fragment of Faustus Socinus, appeared first in Polish at 
 Rakau in 1605. In German it was issued in 1608, with a 
 dedication to the University of Wittenberg. In Latin it was 
 edited by Moscorovius, but with some alterations, under the
 
 INTRODUCTION. 3 3 
 
 title, Catechesis ecclesiarum, quce in regno Polon. et magno ducatu 
 Lithuania et aliis ad istud regnum pertinentibus provinciis adfir- 
 mant, neminem alium prceter patrem Domini nostri J. C. esse 
 ilium unum Deum Israelis, hominem autem ilium, Jesum Naza- 
 renum, qui ex mrginz natus est, nee alium prceter aut ante 
 ipsum, Dei filium unigenitum et agnoscunt et confitentur, Racov. 
 1609. ("Catechetical Instruction of those Churches in the 
 kingdom of Poland and the grand duchy of Lithuania, and 
 other provinces pertaining to that kingdom, which acknow- 
 ledge and confess that no other besides the Father of our Lord 
 Jesus Christ is the one God of Israel, and that He, the man 
 Jesus Christ, who was born of the Virgin, nor any other 
 besides or before Him, is the only-begotten Son of God.") 
 Moscorovius dedicated the edition to James I., King of Great 
 Britain, in a special address ; but, by the decree of the Par- 
 liament, it was publicly burnt in. 1614 (or 1653). An im- 
 pression, with copious refutation, was published by G. L. Oeder 
 at Frankfort and Leipzig in 1739. A new German edition 
 was issued at Eakau, 1612; and a new Latin and enlarged 
 one, with remarks of M. Euar, a zealous Socinian (f 1 6 5 7), and 
 Jonas Schlichting (f 1661), Irenop. 1659 or 1665. The last 
 known edition, with annotations of many hands, was published 
 at Stauropoli, 1684. A German translation appeared in 1666, 
 written by Knoll, who indulged in many alterations of which 
 the Socinians highly disapproved. This Catechism is in ten 
 sections, and the sections are partially subdivided into chap- 
 ters. Oeder was the first to number the questions. 
 
 The following are the most important dogmatic writings of the 
 theologians of the Socinian school : Fausti Socini De Auctoritate 
 Scriptures sacrce libellus; Lectiones sacrcs (imperfect); Prcelectiones theoL; 
 De statu primi hominis ante lapsum Disp. ; De Justificatione ; De J. 
 Ch. servatore Disp. ; De baptismo aquce Disp. ; De ccend Domini tract, 
 brevis, all which, with many others, are collected together in the 
 Bibliotheca fratrum Polonorum, quos Unitarios vacant' (Irenop. 1656, 6 
 vols. fol.), 1 and 2 vol. J. Vblkel, preacher in Smigla (f 1618), De verd 
 relig. libb. quinque, Racov. 1630 (edited by Crell, Amst. 1640). This 
 edition was publicly burnt in Amsterdam, 1642. A Dutch translation 
 appeared in 1649. The Latin is incorporated in Maresii Hydra 
 Socinianismi expugnata, Groen. 1 65 1-1663. It is a comprehensive and 
 systematically arranged handbook of instruction in Socinian dogmatics, 
 
 C
 
 34: CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 and highly prized by the Socinians themselves. J. Crell, pastor and 
 professor in Rakau, who died in 1633, De uno Deopatre, libb. 2, Racov. 
 1631 ; contained, at least so far as concerns God and His attributes, 
 in the Biblioth. frat. Polon. vi. His exegetical writings are printed 
 in the third, fourth, and fifth volumes of the Bill. f. Polon. Ch. 
 Ostorodt, Socinian preacher at Buskow, near Danzig, who died in 
 1611, Unterrichtung von der wichtigsten Hauptpunlden der Chr. Reli- 
 gion. The full title is, ' Instruction in the leading Doctrines of the 
 Christian Religion, containing nearly the entire Confession of the 
 Churches in the kingdom of Poland, etc., Avhich, because they confess 
 that only the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is the only God, etc., 
 are contemptuously branded as Arians (!) and Ebionites,' Rakau 
 1604. It is in forty-two chapters, and almost verbally taken from 
 the writings of Socinus. Val. Smalz, pastor in Rakau, who died 
 1624, Wahrhaft. Erklarung, or True Explanation out of Scripture 
 concerning the Deity of the Lord Jesus, Rakau 1598. In a Latin 
 form, De divinitate J. C. 1608. J. Ludw. Wolzogen (Lord of Taren- 
 felt, who died in 1658), Erkldr. der beiden unterscheidl. Meinungen 
 von der Natur und dem Wesen des einen allerhochsten Gottes, 1646. 
 And. Wissowatius von Szumski (f 1678), Religio naturalis sen de 
 rationis judicio in controversies etiam theologicis ac relig. adhibendo, 
 1685. Joach. Stegmann the elder, a Unitarian preacher at Clausen- 
 burg in Siebenbiirgen, who died in 1632, Dejudice et normd Controv. 
 fidei, libb. ll,Eleutherop. 1644; andPro&. dereinfdlt. Warming fur der 
 neu Photinian. oder Arian. Lehr von J. JBotsacco, Rakau 1638. Sam. 
 Crell (| 1747), Cogitationes nova de primo et secundo Adamo, sen de 
 ratione salutis per ilium amissce, per liunc recuperate?, Amsterd. 1700. 
 The Summa univ. theol. christ. secund. Unitarios (Clausenb. 1787) 
 contains the doctrinal scheme of the Siebenbiirg Unitarians, which 
 in some not unimportant points deviates from the older Socinianism. 
 See J. G. Rosenmiiller, in Staiidlin u. Tzschirner, Archiv. fur Kirchen- 
 gesch. i. 1. 83. The author is generally reputed to have been G. 
 Markos, but this is far from certain. (A short sketch of the doctrine 
 of the English Unitarians, by an anonymous hand, appears in the 
 Theol. Nachr. 1822, L 20.) 
 
 VII THE QUAKERS. 
 Catechism and Confession. 
 
 The Catechism, and Confession of Faith of which Robert 
 Barclay was the author, appeared originally in English : it 
 was translated into Dutch in 1674, into German in 1679.
 
 INTRODUCTION. 3 5 
 
 It appeared also in Latin tinder the title : Catcchismus et 
 fidei confessio approbate*, et confirmata communi consensu ct con- 
 silio patriarcharum, prophetarum et apostolorum, Christo ipso 
 inter eos prcesidente et prosequente, cet., BoterocJ. 1676. The 
 answers in the Catechism, and the entire Confession, consist 
 of sentences of Scripture. Another Catechism for Children 
 appeared in London, by G-. F. (Fox), 1660. 
 
 An Apology for the True Christian Divinity, being an 
 Explanation and Vindication of the Principles and Doctrines 
 of the People called Quakers ; written in Latin and English by 
 Eobert Barclay, and since translated into High Dutch, Low 
 Dutch, French, and Spanish; Baskerville, Birmingham 1765. 
 The doctrinal scheme is reduced to fifteen theses, which 
 Barclay had in 1675 laid down, and here defends at large. 
 J. W. Baier published certain anti- Quaker dissertations, 
 which were collected under the title, Synopsis et examen theol. 
 enthusiast. (Jena, 1701) ; .and these were replied to by G-. 
 Keith, in a defence of Barclay's Apology, Arnica responsio ad 
 Baieri dissertationes, Amst. 1683, which specially seeks to 
 justify the principle of the Quaker faith, the doctrine of the 
 lumen internum, or Inner Light. 
 
 (Clarkson's Portraiture of Quakerism, as taken from a view 
 of the moral, educational, and religious principles, etc., London 
 1806.)
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, AND 
 FOUNDATION OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. 
 
 I. FIEST POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 ALL communities of Christendom, with the exception of the 
 Socinians, agree that the divine revelation of truth is contained 
 simply and purely in the Holy Scriptures. But they differ 
 from each other in this : the Protestant Confessions alone regard 
 the written volume of revelation as complete in itself ; while all 
 others either (1) place in juxtaposition with Scripture certain 
 co-ordinate sources of Christian knowledge and instruction, 
 the Greeks a so-called tradition, and the Eomanists tradition 
 and its living teaching authority, that is, the Pope, or, (2) hold- 
 ing the proper source of the knowledge of divine things to be a 
 direct illumination of every individual by the Holy Ghost, 
 subordinate the Scripture to this personal enlightenment, as 
 merely its testimony (or regula secundaria) and witness. 
 These are represented by the Quakers. 
 
 [The Socinians arbitrarily cut off the half of God's word, 
 that is, the Old Testament, and correct the New 
 Testament also after their own manner.] 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. ortJiod. p. 18 : $avepov TTW? ra apdpa rr)$ 7ri<rre&)<? 
 %pvcri, TO fcvpo? /cat Tr\v So/a/tiaataz>, pepo? diro rrjv aryiav 
 
 87
 
 38 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 v, /ie/305 OTTO rrjv KK\r)<7iaaTiKr)v TrapdSo&iv. . . . "Hyovv 
 Bvo XoytW elvat, TO, Soy/xara. "A\\a (Soypara) irapaSiBei, TJ 
 ypa<f>ij, ra OTrota Tre/Dte^oimu et9 ra 6eo\oytKa J3tj3\ia TJ}? 
 dyias 7pa<?}<>' /cat a\Xa elvai Boypara TrapaSeSo/Aera e/c o-ro- 
 /LWITO? aTTO TOU? aTTOCTToXou?, real rovra epfirfvevdrjcrav airo ra? 
 /cai TOU? aytou? Trarepa?" /cat et9 T<Z Syo roina fj ' 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Co/if. c. 7, p. 82 : Aiaipelrat, TO 
 
 ei9 T TO ypajrrov /cat aypatyov. /cat aypatfrov fj.ev elev av 
 al KK\r]a-iaa~nKa,l TrapaSoo-et?. P. 85 : Oetopovvrai Se at Trapa- 
 7re/3i Te Ta? Te\eTa9 TWI/ ayia>i' fjbvcrrijpicav /cat Trept aXXa 
 pijcrifia /cat T^V KK\rj(riav KOff/jiovvra, cet. (P. 123, 
 the most important traditions of the Church are enumerated, 
 as the veneration of saints and relics, the forty days' fast, the 
 institution of monachism, prayers for the dead, etc.) Comp. 
 Theodos. Zygomalas, in Crusii Turcogrcec. p. 97, and Plato's 
 Katcch. S. 112, 115, 135 f. 
 
 IL KOMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 4, Deer, de canonic, scripturis : Synodus 
 . . . hoc sibi perpetuo ante oculos proponens, ut sublatis erro- 
 ribus puritas ipsa evangelii in ecclesia conservetur, . . . per- 
 spiciensque hanc veritatem et disciplinam contineri in libris 
 scriptis et sine scripto traditionibus, quae ex ipsius Christi ore 
 ab apostolis acceptse, aut ab ipsis apostolis, Spiritu sancto dic- 
 tante, quasi per manus traditae, ad nos usque pervenerunt : 
 orthodoxorum patrum exempla secuta, omnes libros tarn V. 
 quam N. T., cum utriusque unus deus sit auctor, nee non tra- 
 ditiones ipsas, turn ad fidem tuna ad mores pertinentes, tanquam 
 vel ore tenus a Christo, vel a Spiritu sancto dictatas et continua 
 successione in ecclesia catholica conservatas, pari pietatis effectu 
 ac revereuti^ suscipit et veneratur. ... Si quis autem . . . 
 traditiones praedictas sciens et prudens contemserit, anathema 
 sit. Omnes itaque intelligant, quo ordine et via ipsa synodus 
 post iactum fidei confessionis fundamentum sit progressura et 
 quibus potissimum testimonies ac praesidiis in confirmandis 
 dogmatibus et instaurandis in ecclesia moribus sit usura. 
 
 Cat. Eom. prsef. 12 : Omnis doctrinse ratio, quae fidelibus
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 39 
 
 tradenda sit, verbo del continetur, quod in scripturam tradi- 
 tionesque distributum est. The Cat. Eom. contains no more 
 on this subject. 
 
 For appeals to apostolical tradition concerning individual 
 dogmas, and religious ceremonials connected with them, see e.g. 
 Trid. sess. 14, Extreme Unction, cap. 1 ; sess. 22, cap. 4 and 
 9 ; Cat. Eom. i. 6. 3, ii. 7, 29. 
 
 [The Council of Trent begins to indicate a third source of 
 knowledge by the side of Scripture and tradition, when it says, 
 in the introduction to the decrees of the fifth session : S. S. 
 Tridentina synodus sacrarum scripturarum et sanctorum patrum 
 ac probatissimorum conciliorum testimonia et ipsius ecclesice 
 judicium et consensum secuta haec de ipso peccato original! 
 statuft fatetur et declarat. Le Plat, Canones 24. But that 
 this judgment of the Church is no other than the judgment 
 of the Pope, is shown by the Bull Ineffabilis of 8th December 
 1854. For, after Gregory xv. had declared that Eternal 
 Wisdom had not yet revealed to their Church the inmost secret 
 of the mystery of the immaculate conception of Mary, and 
 that therefore he could not define it (Wadding, Legatio, Lovaniae 
 1624, S. 452), Pius ix., on December 8, 1854, declared that 
 the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was revealed of God, 
 and therefore to be firmly and stedfastly believed, esse a Deo 
 revelatam atqiie idcirco db omnibus fidelibus firmiter constanterque 
 credendam. And in Lect. vi. of the Officium of 25th September 
 1863, the Pope commands as follows : Deiparse virginis in sua 
 conceptione victoriam Pius nonus pontifex maximus totius 
 ecclesise votis annuens statuit supremo suo atque infallibili 
 oraculo solemniter proclamare. Accordingly there must be, 
 for all who are subject to the Eoman bishop, three sources of 
 knowledge, Holy Scripture, Tradition, and the Pope.] 
 
 For the elucidation of what in the symbol is merely hinted, 
 we extract a few passages from Bellarmine and others : 1 
 
 1 Comp. Cani Loc. Theol. iii. ; Becani Manuale Controv. i. 2 ; Bossii 
 Inslitt. Theol. i. 66 ; B. Galura, Diss. de Tradit., alterd revel, fonte, Friburg 
 1790 ; Klee, Tcath. Dog. i. 232 ; Schlier, Die gottl. Trad. n. Gesch. u. Idee, 
 in Pletz, Tli. Zeitsch. 1833, iii. On the Protestant side, Chemnicius, Exam. 
 i. loc. 2 ; Weinmann, Darst. u. Kritik der Streltf. iib. die Tradition, Hildburgh 
 1825.
 
 40 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Bellarmini De Verbo Dei, iv. 3 : Nos asserimus, in scripturis 
 non contineri expresse totam doctrinam necessarian! sive de 
 fide sive de moribus, et proinde prseter verbum Dei scriptum 
 requiri etiam verbum Dei non scriptum, ie. divinas et apos- 
 tolicas traditiones. 
 
 iv. 2 : Vocatur doctrina non scripta non ea, quae nusquam 
 scripta est, sed quae non est scripta a primo auctore. E. c. 
 parvulos baptizandos vocatur traditio apostolica non scripta, 
 quia non invenitur hoc scriptum in ullo apostolico libro, tam- 
 etsi scriptum est in libris fere omnium veterum patrum. . . . 
 Est partitio traditionum in traditiones divinas, apostolicas, 
 ecclesiasticas. Divinae dicuntur, quae accepts sunt ab ipso 
 Christo apostolos docente, et nusquam in divinis literis inve- 
 niuntur. . . . Apostolicas traditiones proprie dicuntur illaa, quae 
 ab apostolis institute sunt, non tamen sine assistentia Spiritus 
 sancti et nihilominus non exstant in eorum epistolis. . . . Eccle- 
 siasticae traditiones proprie dicuntur consuetudines quaedam 
 antiquae vel a praelatis vel a populis inchoatae, quae paulatim 
 tacito consensu populorum vim legis obtinuerunt. Et quidem 
 traditiones divinae eandem vim habent, quam divina praecepta 
 sive divina doctrina scripta in Evangeliis. Et similiter apos- 
 tolicae traditiones non scriptae eandem vim habent, quam apos- 
 tolicas traditiones scriptaa. . . . Ecclesiasticae autem traditiones 
 eandem vim habent, quam decreta et constitutiones ecclesitB 
 scriptae. 
 
 [On the third source of knowledge, co-ordinate with Scrip- 
 ture and tradition, compare the fourth commission of the seven 
 Consultores of Pius ix. : Caterini, Audisio, Perrone, Passaglia, 
 Schrader, Spada, and Trullet, for the year 1853 : " It is not 
 necessary, in order to establish tradition, that we produce an 
 uninterrupted series of testimonies of the Fathers, a series 
 which should go up to the apostles, in order to come down to 
 ourselves. It must be confessed that Catholic tradition is 
 proved, when we can establish the general consent of the Church 
 at any particular epoch, or produce a certain number of testi- 
 monies that presuppose it." Malou, L'immaculee conception de 
 la 6. -y. M. consideree comme dogme de foi, Bruxelles 1857. And 
 Malou himself in this work, which was undertaken in the 
 cause of the episcopate assembled in Borne, dedicated to Pius
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 41 
 
 IX., says : " The promises of infallibility which our Lord Jesus 
 Christ made to His Church are of such a kind, that neither the 
 body of the pastors in proposing a doctrine of faith, nor the 
 faithful in adhering to it, can be deceived. It is impossible 
 that the entire body of the Church should adopt and believe a 
 doctrine contrary to divine revelation. From the moment that 
 the pastors and the flock profess with unanimous accord a doc- 
 trine dogmatic in its nature, or are certain that this doctrine is 
 true, and that it has been revealed, from that time it bears 
 the seal by which the Divine Master has willed that His teach- 
 ing should be recognised. ... If this accord should appear 
 only in our days, it is no less decisive than it would have been 
 in the era of the martyrs, because it has the same guarantee 
 as it would have had at that epoch. The Catholic Ghurch enjoys 
 to-day the same authority and the same divine assistance as in 
 the days of the apostles ; it therefore possesses the same infalli- 
 bility" The infallible organ of this infallible Church is, how- 
 ever, the Pope. So the Eomish synod of 1854; so Pope 
 Pius ix. Syllabus errorum d. d. 8th December 1864, No. 
 xxiii.] 
 
 III. PBOTESTANT. 
 
 The older Lutheran symbols reject, it is true, the humanas 
 traditions, valid in the Eoman Catholic Church (Confess. Aug. 
 pp. 13, 28 seq. ; Apol. p. 205 seq. ; Art. Smal. p. 337) ; they 
 do not, however, mean thereby the apostolical doctrinal tradition 
 generally, as a source of Christian truth and knowledge, but 
 those meritorious works of justification which obscured the 
 doctrine of (justifying) faith (trad, ad placandum Deum, ad 
 promerendam gratiam et satisfaciendum pro peccatis, Conf. 
 Aug. p. 28 ; Apol. 15 1). 1 Compare, however, Aug. Conf. prsefat. 
 
 1 Since these symbols understand by traditiones observances and usages, and 
 of that kind much was retained from the old Church, they might rightly 
 maintain (Aug. Conf. p. 31) : servantur apud nos plerteque traditiones, quae 
 conducunt ad hoc, ut res ordine geratur in ccclesia, ut ordo lectionum in missa 
 et praecipuse feriae. Apol. pp. 209, 212. But every notion of meritoriousness 
 was to be excluded from them. Calvin also, in conformity with the position 
 polemics then assumed, contended against these traditions primarily (traditiones 
 humanas) : v. Instit. iv. 10.
 
 42 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 p. 6 : offerimus . . . nostram confessionem, ejusmodi dociri- 
 nam ex S. S. et puro verbo Dei hactenus illi (concionatores) 
 . . . tractaverint. It is the Form. Cone. p. 5*70, which first 
 speaks out more definitely : Credimus . . . unicam regulam 
 et normam, secundum quam omnia dogmata omnesque doctores 
 aestimari-et judicari oporteat, nullam omnino aliam esse, quam 
 prophetica et apostolica scripta cum V. turn N. T. . . . Reliqua 
 vero sive patrum sive neotericorum scripta, quocunque veniant 
 nomine, sacris literis nequaquam sunt aequiparanda. [Cf. Sol. 
 Dec. p. 6 3 2. In explanation, L. Hutter, Comp. loc. Th. No. 1 seq. : 
 Scriptura sacra est verbum Dei, impulsu Spiritus s. a prophetis 
 et apostolis literarum monumentis consignaturn, de essentia et 
 voluntate Dei nos instruens. Est (autem) plena ct sufficicns 
 quoad informationem turn Jidei turn morum.'] 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. 1 : In Scriptura sancta habet universalis Ch. 
 ecclesia plenissime exposita, quaecunque pertinent cum ad sal- 
 vificam fidem turn ad vitam deo placentem recte informandam. 
 . . . Sentimus ergo ex hisce scripturis petendam esse veram 
 sapientiam et pietatem, ecclesiarum quoque reformationeni et 
 gubernationem, omniumque ofnciorum pietatis institutionem, 
 probationem denique dogmatuni reprobationemque aut erromm 
 confutationem omnium, sed admonitiones omnes. Cap. 2 : 
 Non alium sustinemus in causa fidei judicem, quam ipsum 
 deum per script, s. pronunciantem, quid verurn sit, q"uid falsum, 
 quid sequendum sit quidve fugienduni. . . . Eepudiamus tradi- 
 tiones humanas, quae tametsi insigniantur speciosis titulis, quasi 
 divinse apostolicaeque sint, viva voce apostolorum et ceu per 
 manus viroram apostolicorum, succedentibus episcopis ecclesiae 
 traditae, compositae tamen cum scripturis ab his discrepant, dis- 
 crepantiaque ilia sua ostendunt, se minime esse apostolicas. 
 Sicut enim apostoli inter se diversa non docuerunt, ita et apos- 
 tolici non contraria apostolis ediderunt. Quin imo impium 
 esset asseverare, apostolos viva voce contraria scriptis suis tra- 
 didisse. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 5 : Quum hsec (s. s.) sit omnis veritatis 
 summa, complectens quidquid ad cultum dei et salutem nos- 
 tram requiritur, neque hominibus neque ipsis etiam angelis fas 
 esse dicimus, quidquam ei verbo adjicere vel detrahere vel 
 quidquam prorsus in eo immutare.
 
 THE SOUKCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 43 
 
 Conf. Belg. 7 : Oedimus sacram scripturam del voluntatem 
 perfects complecti, et quodcunque ab hominibus, ut salutem 
 consequantur, credi necesse est, in ilia sufficienter edoceri. 
 Nam quum illic omnis divini cultus ratio, quern deus a nobis 
 exigit, fusissime descripta sit, nulli hominum ... fas est, 
 aliter docere. . . . Quum enim vetitum sit, ne quis dei verbo 
 quidquam addat aut detrahat, satis eo ipso demonstratur, 
 doctrinam illius perfectissimam omnibusque modis consum- 
 matam esse. Sed nee cum divinis iisdem seripturis ulla ho- 
 minum, quantavis sanctitate prseditorum scripta, neque ulla 
 consuetude cum divina veritate (veritas enim rebus omnibus 
 antecellit), neque multitude, neque antiquitas, neque temporum 
 personarumque successio, neque concilia, decreta aut statuta 
 comparari possunt. 
 
 Thirty-nine Articles. Art. vi. : Holy Scripture containeth 
 all things necessary to salvation ; so that whatsoever is not read 
 therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of 
 any man that it should be believed as an article of the Faith, or 
 to be thought requisite or necessary to salvation. Comp. Art. 
 xix. and xxi. : Wherefore things ordained by them as necessary . 
 to salvation have neither strength nor authority, unless it may 
 be declared that they are taken out of Holy Scripture. 
 
 Confess. Scot. 18 : Doctrina, quse ab ecclesiis nostris docetur, 
 verbo dei scripto continetur, videl. in libris V. et N. T. cano- 
 nicis, in quibus omnia credenda ad hominum salutem suffi- 
 cienter expressa affirmamus. 1 9 : Sicut confitemur scripturas 
 dei sufficienter instruere et hominem dei perfectum reddere, 
 ita ejus'auctoritatem a deo esse . . . affirmamus. Asserimus 
 itaque, quod qui dicunt scripturas non aliam habere auctorita- 
 tem sed earn, quam ab ecclesia accipit, sunt in deum blasphemi 
 cet. Compare the Negative, p. 159. 
 
 [West. Conf. ch. i. sec. 6 : The whole counsel of God, con- 
 cerning all things necessary for His own glory, man's salvation, 
 faith, and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by 
 good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scrip- 
 ture ; unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether 
 by hew revelations of the Spirit or traditions of men. Never- 
 theless we acknowledge the inward illumination of the Spirit 
 of God to be necessary for the saving understanding of such
 
 44 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 things as are revealed in the word ; and that there are some 
 circumstances concerning the worship of God, and government 
 of the Church, common to human actions and societies, which 
 are to be ordered by the light of nature and Christian prudence, 
 according to the general rules of the word, which are always 
 to be observed. 
 
 Declar. Thorun. p. 47 : Nullum hodie verbum del exstat 
 aut certo ostendi potest de dogmatibus fidei aut pmeceptis vitre 
 ad Salutem necessariis, quod non sit scriptum aut in scripturis 
 fundatum, sed sola" traditione non scripta ecclesise commissum. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. i. 13 : Libris sacris perfecte continetur plena 
 et plus quam sufficiens revelatio omnium fidei mysteriorum 
 inprimis eorum, quae universis et singulis hominibus simpli- 
 citer ad asternam salutem consequendam scitu, creditu, speratu, 
 factu necessaria sunt. 
 
 Ib. i. 1 sqq. : Quia solis libris sacris divina auctoritas corn- 
 petit, necessarium etiam est, ut ad eos solos tanquam ad Lydios 
 lapides controversiae et lites omnes ad religionem pertinentes 
 exigantur et ex iis solis disceptentur ; . . . dirimi enim eas 
 jure judicial! aut potestativo per judicem aliquem visibilem ac 
 ordinarie loquentem in ecclesia deum minime voluisse cen- 
 sendum est, cum normam tantum dirigentem sive directive 
 duntaxat, non etiam coactive judicantem nobis in verbo suo 
 relinquere voluerit, judicem vero infallibilem semper in ecclesia 
 loquentem esse debere nusquam significaverit. Ib. i. 1 : 
 Etsi vero primitiva ecclesia certissime rescire potuit et indubie 
 etiam rescivit, libros istos ab apost. scriptos esse vel saltern 
 approbates nobisque istius rei scientiam quasi per manus tra- 
 didit, non tamen idcirco sacri hi libri a nobis pro veris ac 
 divinis habentur, quod eos veros esse sive divinos continere 
 sensus ecclesia prim, judicio suo irrefragabili censuerit cet. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 It is easily inferred that the Protestant symbols did not so much 
 reject apostolical tradition in itself (in the ideal sense), as rather those 
 traditions which by the Romanists were counted apostolical, but could 
 not be reconciled with Scripture, or sustain by demonstration their 
 apostolical origin (Chemnitz, Exam. i. 2). The utterances of the 
 Councils and of the Fathers have obviously, on these principles, no 
 co-ordinate consideration, nor, as against Scripture, decisive authority ;
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 45 
 
 but, found true in accordance with Scripture, they are venerable tes- 
 timonies of the Christian truth never altogether extinguished in the 
 Church. Art. Sm. 308 ; Form. Cone. 570 ; Conf. Helv. i. 3, ii. 2 ; 
 Gall. 5 ; Scot. 20 ; Belg. 7 ; Conf. Remonst. i. 12, 18. The same may 
 be said of the three (Ecumenical Creeds, by adopting which the Pro- 
 testant Church gave documentary evidence of its union in sentiment 
 with the ancient Church. Form. Cone. 571. Comp. Helv. ii. 17 ; 
 Conf. Gall. 5 ; Eng. Artt. 8 ; Belg. 9 ; Bohem. 2 ; March. 2 ; Dec. 
 Thorun. p. 45. Comp. also Chemnitz, Examen 1, Prcef. 10 ; Calvin, 
 Institt. iv. 9. 1. 
 
 It needs only to be lightly indicated, that the construction or 
 adoption of the symbolical books furnishes no analogy with Roman 
 Catholic tradition. Comp. Form. Cone. p. 572. Among the Re- 
 formed Confessions, that of Basel thus concludes : Finally, we would 
 submit this our Confession to the judgment of the divine written 
 Scriptures ; . . . and we in this and all will be thankfully obedient 
 to the direction of God and His holy word. Similarly, Conf. Helv. ii., 
 and Conf. Scot., at the end of the preface. However, in the Conclusio 
 of the Canons of Dort, and in the Form. Cons. Helv. 26, the symbols 
 are named in conjunction with the Scripture. In the latter passage 
 the term Libri SyntboUti is used of the public confessions. 
 
 IV. SOCINIAN. 
 
 The Socinians regard the New Testament books as the only 
 source of the knowledge of the Christian Church, so far as this 
 is doctrine, that is, a new divine legislation. They attach to 
 the Old Testament, which is supposed to have been rendered 
 obsolete by the New, only an historical, and not a dogmatic 
 value. 
 
 Cat. Eac. p. 1 (final Eevision) : Unde discere possumus 
 religionem christ. ? Ex sacris literis prsesertim N. T. Ex- 
 stant igitur alise sacrse literae prseter literas N. T. ? Exstant, 
 nempe scripta V. T. Ib. p. 6 : Quoe (religionis Christiana? 
 veritas) cum iis (scriptis Novi Testamenti) tantum, nee ullis 
 aliis libris comprehensa sit, apparet, iis libris necessario prop- 
 terea habendam esse fidem. 
 
 Socin. de auctorit. S. S. cap. 1, p. 271 b : Considerandum 
 est, si recipiatur Novum Testamentum, non posse ad ipsam 
 religionis summam quidquam fere momenti habere quam- 
 cumque Veteris Testamenti depravationem, cum nihil non levis 
 momenti potuerit esse in Vetere Testamento, quod Novo non
 
 46 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 contineatur, nee quidquam illius recipiendum sit, quod non 
 conveniat cum iis, quae in hoc sunt scripta. Adeo ut utilis 
 quidem plures ob causas sit lectio Veteris Testamenti iis, qui 
 Novum recipiunt, id est hominibus christianse religionis, sed 
 non tamen necessaria. 
 
 Cat. Sac. qu. 31 : (Scripta divinarum literarum) prorsus 
 sufficientia sunt ad earn rem (ut in rebus ad salutem neces- 
 sariis iis soils acquiescendum sit) : eo quod fides in Jesum 
 Christum et obedientia mandatorum ejus sit in iis scriptis N". 
 Foederis sufficientissime tradita et explicata, quam ex del pro- 
 missione vita seterna consequitur. 
 
 Ib. qu. 33 : (De traditionibus rom. eccles. sentiendum est) 
 eas non solum sine causa" et just& necessitate confictas et in- 
 ventas esse, verum etiam summo cum discrimine fidei chris- 
 tianse. 
 
 The Protestant symbols designate the Old and New Testa- 
 ments in common, and without distinction, as Scriptura sacra. 
 Comp. Conf. Helv. ii. 1 ; Conf. Gall. 3 ; Thirty-nine Artt. vi ; 
 Conf. Belg. 4. How far the Old Testament still retains its 
 authority as Law, see below, under XIIL 
 
 V. QUAKER. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop, il : Seeing no man knoweth the Father 
 but the Son, and he to whom the Son revealeth Him ; and 
 seeing the revelation of the Son is in and by the Spirit ; 
 therefore the testimony of the Spirit is that alone by which 
 the true knowledge of God hath been, is, and can be only 
 revealed. ... By the revelation of the same Spirit He hath 
 manifested Himself all along unto the sons of men, both 
 patriarchs, prophets, and apostles : which revelations of God 
 by the Spirit, whether by outward voices and appearances, 
 dreams, or inward objective manifestations in the heart, were 
 of old the formal object of their faith, and remain yet so to be. 
 Moreover, these divine inward revelations, which we make 
 absolutely necessary for the building up of true faith, neither 
 do, nor can ever, contradict the outward testimony of the Scrip- 
 tures, or right and sound reason ; yet from hence it will not 
 follow that these divine revelations are to be subjected to- the
 
 THE SOUKCE OF CIIIIISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 47 
 
 test either of the outward testimony of the Scriptures or of 
 the natural reason of man, as to a more noble or certain rule 
 and touchstone : for this divine revelation and inward illumi- 
 nation is that which is evident and clear of itself, forcing, by 
 its own evidence and clearness, the well-disposed understanding 
 to assent irresistibly the same thereunto, even as the common 
 principles of natural truths do move and incline the mind to 
 a natural assent : as, that the whole is greater than its part ; 
 that two contradictories can neither be both true nor both 
 false. . . . Comment, on Prop. ii. 1 5 : He, then, that acknow- 
 ledges himself ignorant, and a stranger to the inward inbeing 
 of the Spirit of Christ in his heart, doth thereby acknowledge 
 himself to be yet in the carnal mind, which is enmity to God, 
 whatever he may otherwise know or believe of Christ, or how- 
 ever much skilled or acquainted with the letter of the. Holy 
 Scripture ; not yet to be, notwithstanding all that, attained to 
 the least degree of a Christian ; yea, not once to have embraced 
 the Christian religion. For take but away the Spirit, and 
 Christianity remains no more Christianity than the dead car- 
 case of a man, when the soul and spirit is departed, remains a 
 man, which the living can no more abide, but do bury out of 
 the sight, as a noisome and useless thing, however acceptable 
 it hath been when actuated and moved by the soul. 15 : 
 Yet those that have their spiritual senses, and can savour the 
 things of the Spirit, as it were in primd instantid, i.e. at the 
 first blush, can discern them without, or before they apply 
 them either to Scripture or reason. But to make an end, I 
 shall add one argument to prove that this inward, immediate 
 objective revelation, winch we have pleaded for all along, is 
 the only sure, certain, and unmoveable foundation of all Chris- 
 tian faith ; which argument, when well considered, I hope will 
 have weight with all sorts of Christians ; and it is this : That 
 which all professors of Christianity, of what kind soever, are 
 forced ultimately to recur unto, when pressed to the last, that 
 for and because of which all other foundations are recom- 
 mended, and accounted worthy to be believed, and without 
 which they are granted to be of no weight at all, must needs 
 be the only most true, certain, and unmoveable foundation oi 
 all Christian faith. S 11 : But there are some that will con-
 
 48 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 fess that the Spirit doth now lead and influence the saints, but 
 that He doth it only subjectively, or in a blind manner, by 
 enlightening their understandings to understand and believe 
 the truth delivered in the Scriptures, but not at all by pre- 
 senting those truths to the mind by way of object ; and this 
 they call medium incognitum asscntiendi, as that of whose 
 working a man is not sensible. This opinion, though some- 
 what more tolerable than the former, is nevertheless not alto- 
 gether according to truth, neither doth it reach the fulness of 
 it. Because there be many truths which, as they are appli- 
 cable to particulars and individuals, and most needful to be 
 known by them, are in nowise to be found in the Scripture, 
 as in the following proposition shall be shown. Besides, the 
 arguments already adduced do prove that the Spirit doth not 
 only subjectively help us to discern truths elsewhere delivered, 
 but also objectively present those truths to our minds. For 
 that which teacheth me all things, and is given me for that 
 end, without doubt presents those things to my mind which 
 it teacheth me. It is not said, It shall teach you to understand 
 those things that are written ; but, It shall teach you all things. 
 Again, that which brings all things to my remembrance, must 
 needs present them by way of object ; else it were improper 
 to say it brought them to my remembrance, but only that it 
 helpeth to remember the objects brought from elsewhere. 
 
 Prop. iii. : From these revelations of the Spirit of God to 
 the saints have proceeded the Scriptures of truth, which, be- 
 cause they are only a declaration of the fountain, and not the 
 fountain itself, therefore they are not to be esteemed the prin- 
 cipal ground of all truth and knowledge, nor yet the adequate 
 primary rule of faith and manners ; yet, because they give a 
 true and faithful testimony of the first foundation, they are 
 and may be esteemed a secondary rule, subordinate to the 
 Spirit, from which they have all their excellency and cer- 
 tainty. For as by the inward testimony of the Spirit we do 
 alone truly know Ihem, so they testify that the Spirit is that 
 guide by which the saints are led into all truth ; therefore, 
 according to the Scriptures, the Spirit is the first and principal 
 leader. . . . Commentary on Prop. iii. 2 : Though, then, we do 
 acknowledge the Scriptures to be very heavenly and divine
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 49 
 
 writings, the use of them to be very comfortable and necessary 
 to the Church of Christ, and that we also admire and give 
 praise to the Lord for His wonderful providence in preserving 
 these writings so pure and uncorrupted as we have them, 
 through so long a night of apostasy, to be a testimony of His 
 truth against the wickedness and abominations even of those 
 whom He made instruments in preserving them, so that they 
 have kept them to be a witness against themselves ; yet we 
 may not call them the principal fountain of all truth and 
 knowledge, nor yet the first adequate rule of faith and manners : 
 because the principal fountain of truth must be the truth itself, 
 that is, that whose certainty and authority depends not upon 
 another. . . . That which is given to Christians for a rule and 
 guide must needs be so full, that it may clearly and distinctly 
 guide and order them in all things and occurrences that may 
 fall out. But in that there are numberless things, with regard 
 to their circumstances, which particular Christians may be con- 
 cerned in, for which there can be no particular rule had in the 
 Scriptures, therefore the Scriptures cannot be a rule to them. 
 S 6 : Moreover, because they are commonly acknowledged 
 by all to have been written by the dictates of the Holy Spirit, 
 and that the errors which may be supposed by the injuries of 
 times to have slipt in, are not such but that there is a sufficient 
 clear testimony left to all the essentials of the Christian faith, 
 we do look upon them as the only fit outward judge of con- 
 troversies among Christians, and that whatsoever doctrine is 
 contrary unto their testimony may therefore justly be rejected 
 as false ; and for our parts, we are very willing that all our 
 doctrines and practices be tried by them. 
 
 II. SECOND POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 [The decision as to the true meaning and interpretation of 
 Holy Scripture rests, according to the Eoman Catholic doctrine, 
 with the Church, that is, in the last appeal, with the Pope. 
 Every one must submit to it, or rather to him. The Council 
 of Trent limited this absolute right of determination by a 
 
 D
 
 50 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 clause which referred to the clear and consentient voice of 
 the Fathers ; but in later times this limitation has been 
 allowed by the Papal Church to drop out. Protestants, on the 
 other hand, maintain that the true meaning of Holy Writ, so 
 far as its contents are the sum of what constitutes the faith 
 necessary for salvation, may be plainly extracted from Holy 
 Writ itself. The Quakers separate the Holy Spirit from the 
 written word, and teach that the internal light suffices for the 
 understanding of the nature and of the will of God. The 
 question as to the interpretation of the written word is for 
 them a very subordinate one. They deal with it, however, 
 thus : He whom the Holy Spirit has previously inwardly en- 
 lightened, will also understand and be able to expound the 
 Bible.] 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. EOMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 4, Deer, de edit, et usu S. S. : Ad coercenda 
 petulantia ingenia decernit (synodus), ut nemo suae prudentise 
 innixus, in rebus fidei et morum ad sedifi cationem doctrinoa 
 christianae pertinentium, sacram scripturam ad suos sensus con- 
 torquens contra eum sensum, quern tenuit et tenet sancta mater 
 ecclesia, cujus est judicare de vero sensu et interpretation scrip- 
 turarum sanctarum, aut etiam contra unanimem consensum 
 patrum ipsam scripturam sacrain interpretari audeat, etiamsi 
 hujusmodi interpretations nullo unquam tempore in lucem 
 edendae forent. Qui contravenerint, per ordinaries declarentur 
 et pcenis a jure statutis puniantur. 
 
 [The Pope has recently explained Holy Scripture in a man- 
 ner contra unanimem consensum patrum ; for in his Bull 
 Ineffdbilis he has, contrary to that consensus, interpreted many 
 passages (Gen. iii. 15, Jer. i. 28, Luke i. 42, etc.) of the Im- 
 maculate Conception. And nevertheless he condemns in his 
 Bull, delivered from the chair, every one who shall think in 
 his heart otherwise than the Pope thinks.] 
 
 (Bellarmini de verbo dei, iii 3 : Convenit inter nos et adver- 
 saries, scripturas intelligi debere eo spiritu, quo factse sunt i. e. 
 spir. sancto. . . . Tota igitur qusestio in eo posita est, ubi sit
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 51 
 
 iste spiritus. Nos enim existimamus, hunc spiritum, etsi 
 multis privatis hominibus ssepe conceditur, tamen certo inve- 
 niri in ecclesia" i. e. in concilio episcoporum confirmato a summo 
 ecclesiae totius pastore sive in summo pastore cum concilio ali- 
 orum pastorum. II. cap. 9 : Non ignorabat deus multas in 
 ecclesia exorituras disputationes circa fidem, debuit igitur judi- 
 cem aliquem ecclesiae providere. At iste judex non potest esse 
 scriptura, neque spiritus revelans privatus, neque princeps secu- 
 laris, igitur princeps ecclesiasticus vel solus vel certe cum con- 
 silio et consensu coepiscoporum. Ac primum non esse judicem 
 scripturam, planum est, quia varies sensus recipit nee potest 
 ipsa dicere, quis sit verus. Prseterea in omni republ. bene 
 instituta et ordinata lex et judex distinctse res sunt. Lex 
 enim docet quid agendum, et judex legem interpretatur et 
 secundum earn homines dirigit. Denique de scripturse inter- 
 pretatione qusestio est, non autem se ipsa interpretari potest. 
 Ib. cap. 1 : Verbum ecclesise i. e. concilii vel pontincis docentis 
 ex cathedra^ non est verbum hominis i. e. verbum errori ob- 
 noxium, sed aliquo modo verbum dei i. e. prolatum assistente 
 et gubernante Sp. sancto. Cf. Cani Loci, lib. iv. ; Becani ma- 
 nuale, i. 5 ; Klee, Tcatlwl. Dogmat. i. 243 ff.) 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 The Conf. orthod. plainly lays down the position, that the 
 Church alone has the power to expound Scripture ; for what 
 occurs on p. 140, 97 KK\Tja-ia e^a rrjv ej-ovcrlav rovryv, ware 
 . . . SoKiftdfy) rd<s <ypa<f>d<;, must be understood of human 
 writings. To the oecumenical synods, which were no other 
 than the Church itself deciding on this authoritative dogma, 
 this confession expressly ascribes a judicial power in regard to 
 the orthodox faith. Other Confessions laid down the prin- 
 ciple, that none must deviate from the traditional interpreta- 
 tions of the holy Fathers which have been approved by the 
 synods (Jerem. in actis Wirtemb. p. 260). Moreover, that 
 principle follows from the dogma as to the inspiration of 
 the Church, which the Greeks 'hold in common with the Jlo- 
 manists. Cf. Conf. orthod. p. 152. The Confession of Dosi- 
 theus speaks on this subject plainly.
 
 52 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Conf. orihod. p. 1 7 : IIpeTrei va Kparfj Sia fiefBaiov Kal d 
 <fcifto\ov 6 6p66Soos xpiariavos, TTW? 6'Xa ra apOpa rr}<; 
 rrjs Kado\ucrjs KOI opdoSo^ov eKK\rj<ria<; elvat TrapaSeo'ofi.eva drro 
 rov Kvptov rjfi-wv 'Irja-ovv Xpivrov . . . KOL al oiKovftevixal avvo- 
 Soi ra ep/jLrjvevova'av Kal ra eSoKifjuurav KOI va mcrreur) ei? avrd. 
 P. 18 : $avepov TTW? ra apOpa r^9 Triarew 1 ; e%ov<Tt TO 
 KO\ rrjv SoKi/juicriav . . . fiepo<; airo rr)v IKK\. 7rapd8o(Tiv, 
 CLTTO rrjv 8iSacTKd\iav rwv evvoSwv teal rwv dyiwv rrarepwv. 
 P. 1 9 : Kal rovra (the dogmas of apostolical tradition) 
 i>v0r)<rav d-rro ra? ery^oSou? Kal rovs dyiovs rrarepas. 
 
 Metroph. Critopul. Conf. c. 7, p. 84 : 77 dyia ypacj)ij 
 revdrj rfj KK\t]cria VTTO 6eov, a>? SOKCCV rrjv KK\r)criav 
 Kal oBrjybv elvai TT)? Beorrvevcrrov ypatpfjs . . . oSrjyov, on 
 ravrrjv ij/tia? o&rpyei, ra dcra(f)rj SoKovvra cracfrrjvl^ova-a Kal 
 ra KKa\v/Apeva rrdvv op^oSofw? Kal 6ea- 
 
 Jerem. in act. Wirtcnib. p. 142 : Ov% -fj^lv e^ecrt, ry 
 KaraOappovaiv e^rjyijcrei, rt rwv 77)? Oeorrvevarov e ypa(}>rj<; p 
 crvvievai, Kal Karavoelv r) Siepfj-rjveveiv el ftr) Kara rwv rcapa rwv 
 dyiwv (TvvoBcav ev dyia) Trvevftart, Trpo? rov evGfftr) O-KOTTOV BOKL- 
 
 Id. p. 260 : Aio Kal avdis d^Lovfj,v VJJLO,^, ovrw voelv ra 
 pijra 60? ol oiKOVfjievLKol Si$dcrKa\oi, rrjs eKK.\T]O'ia^ e^rjy^a-avro, 
 wv ra? e^7?7cret5 atre oiKovfj.eviKal % avvoSot Kal al \oi7ral 
 roiTLKai eKeKVpaxrav. '/2? yap rrpoeiiro^ev, ov %prj 
 opia al(i)via a edevro ol Trarepes, I'va firj rov opov ev d 
 prjQevra rfjs r' rrapaftaivovres, TO!? eKiriftiois vrroxeicrwiieda. 
 
 Cf. pp. 114, 116, 139, 250, and in Crusii Turco-Grcccia, 
 p. 440. 
 
 Dosithei Conf. c. 2 : Uia-revofiev rrjv Oeiav ypatyrjv etvat 6eo- 
 Kal Sia rovro ravrp aSiao-ra/cTW? ma-reveiv o^e/Xo- 
 OVK aXX&>9 pevroi aXX' fj o><; r) Ka0o\. KK\r)<ri'a ravrrjv 
 Kal TrapeSwKev. . . . rrjv rfjs Ka6o\. KK\rjcria<; /j,ap- 
 rvpiav ov% rjrrov TT}<? fjv Kefcrrjrat, rj 6eia ypa<f>rj, elvat, ma-revo- 
 fiev evos yap Kal rov avrov dyiov rrvfvfjiaros 0^x09 d/ji<f)orepa)v 
 SrjfjLiovpyov, 1<rov e<7Tt rrdvrw<s VTTO rrj? ypatyrjs Kal vrro rr}<? 
 KaOo\. eKK\rj(r. SiSda-KeaBai. . . . rrjv Kado\. eKK\rj<r. ct>9 Xa- 
 \ovcrav K rov rrvev/Aaros rov 6eov dBvvarov rrdvrrj dfjiaprfja-ai, 
 f) oX&>9 uTrarrjcrat Kal dTrarrjBfjvai. Cf. C. 12.
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 53 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 The Lutheran symbols, as a whole, do not speak expressly 
 on interpretation of Scripture independent/ of ecclesiastical 
 authority. But their meaning is plain from their fundamental 
 principles, as to the nullity of all tradition, and of any infalli- 
 bility in the visible Church ; as also from the fact that the 
 Eeformation sprang from that very freedom, and that the sym- 
 bolical books argue exegetically against the Eoman Catholic 
 Church. Only the Conf. Wirt. p. 130, expressly rejects the 
 jus interpretandce s. scripturce in potestate summorum pontificum 
 situm. The Lutheran theologians, following the symbols, lay 
 down, like the Eeformed, this antithesis to the Catholic posi- 
 tion : S. S. est sui ipsius legitimus interpres (comp. under Helv. 
 Conf. i.), and avow the perspicuitas S. S., which makes an 
 exegetic-dogmatic tribunal superfluous. 
 
 Conf. Helv. i. art. 2 : Scripturae sacrse interpretatio ex ipsii 
 sola petenda est, ut ipsa interpres sit sui, caritatis fideique 
 regula moderante. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 2 : Scripturas sanctas dixit apost. Petrus 
 (2 Pet. i. 20) non esse interpretations privatse. Proinde non 
 probamus interpretationes quaslibet : unde nee pro vera aut 
 genuina scripturarum interpretatione agnoscimus eum, quern 
 vocant sensum Eonianae ecclesise, quern scilicet simpliciter 
 Eomanee ecclesise defensores omnibus obtrudere contendunt 
 recipiendum. Sed ill am duntaxat scripturarum interpretationem 
 pro orthodoxa et genuine agnoscimus, quae ex ipsis est petita 
 scripturis (ex ingenio utique ejus linguse, in qua sunt scriptae, 
 secundum circumstantias, item expenses et pro ratione locorum 
 vel similium vel' dissimilium, plurium quoque et clariorum, 
 expositse), cum regula fidei et caritatis congruit et ad gloriam 
 dei hominumque salutem eximie facit. 
 
 Conf. Scot. 18 : Scripturae sacrae interpretationem neque ad 
 privatam aliquam aut publicam personam pertinere confitemur, 
 neque ad ecclesiam aliquam, . . . sed jus et auctoritas haec est 
 solius spiritus dei, per quern sacra? scripture literis sunt man- 
 datoe. Cum ergo contingit, quod contravertitur pro recto sensu 
 alicujus loci vel sententise scripturae, . . . non tarn videndum 
 nobis est, quid homines ante nos vel dixerint vel fecerint, quam
 
 54 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 quid Spiritus sanctus uniformiter in corpore sacrse scripture 
 dicat. ... Si itaque interpretatio, determinatio vel sententia 
 cujusvis doctoris ecclesiae vel concilii expresso dei verbo in 
 quovis alio scriptures loco repugnet, certum est, illam interpre- 
 tationem non esse mentem et sensum sancti Spiritus. Nullum 
 enim interpretationem admittere audemus, quae alicui prin- 
 cipali articulo fidei aut alicui piano textui scripturae aut cari- 
 tatis regulae repugnat. 
 
 Conf. Eemonslr. i 14 : Librorum sacrorum, licet alicubi prse- 
 sertim indoctis et minus exercitatis satis obscuri sint, tanta est 
 claritas ac perspicuitas in sensibus inprimis ad aeternam salu- 
 tem intellectu necessariis, ut omnes lectores non docti tantum 
 sed et idiotae, quantum satis est, mentem eorum assequi pos- 
 sint ; modo praejudicio, vana confidentia aliisque pravis affecti- 
 bus sese occaecari non sinant, etc. 
 
 [Baier, Compendium theologies positives, ed. E. Preuss, Bero- 
 lini 1864, viiL S. 95, 96 : Inter affectiones Scripturae locum 
 habet perspicuitas, seu quod ea quae creditu et factu homini ad 
 salutem tendenti sunt necessaria, verbis et phrasibus ita claris 
 et usu loquendi reoeptis in Scriptura proponuntur, ut quilibet 
 homo, linguae gnarus et vel mediocri judicio pollens, verbisque 
 attendens, verum verborum sensum, quoad ea, quae sibi sunt 
 scitu necessaria, assequi, et capita ipsa doctrinae simplici men- 
 tis apprehensione amplecti possit : prout ad assensum fidei 
 verbo apprehenso et rebus significatis praebendum intellectus 
 hominis per scripturam ipsam ej usque lumen supernaturale seu 
 virtutem divinam illi conjunctam perducitur. The analogy 
 of faith was regarded by the older theologians as the guiding 
 principle of exposition (Apol. A. C. 290 ; Luther's Werkc, 
 Walch, iii. 2042). They never, indeed, denied that false in- 
 terpretations of Scripture might be found, and have been found, 
 by the side of the true and only right one. But the notion 
 was to them unknown, that every passage may be expounded 
 in three-and-twenty various ways, and that it was the business 
 of every man to select from this fortuitous mass his own 
 opinion.] Cf. Twesten, Vorlesung, i 450.
 
 THE SOUKCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 55 
 
 IV. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. racov. p. 1 5 (qu. 3 6) : Etsi difficultates qusedam in S. S. 
 occurrunt, tamen multa alia turn ea, quee sunt ad salutem 
 necessaria ita perspicue aliis in locis S. S. sunt tradita, ut ab 
 unoquoque maxime vero pietatis ac veritatis studioso et divi- 
 nam opem implorante possint intelligi (qu. 37). Qu& ratione 
 id demonstrabis ? Primum, cum deus eo fine atque consilio 
 S. Scripturam hominibus tradi voluerit, ut ex ea voluntatem 
 ipsius cognoscerent, incredibile prorsus est, ejusmodi scripta 
 tradi voluisse, e quibus voluntas ipsius perfici et cognosci ab 
 omnibus non posset. Deinde, quod in ipsis religionis chr. 
 principiis apostoli epistolas suas, in quibus prsecipua religionis 
 chr. mysteria continentur, ad homines simplices scripserint. 
 In qu. 39 it is then shown whence have sprung the many 
 dissidia in eruendo scripturce sensu ; and among other reasons 
 this is assigned, that men do not as much as they ought, and 
 with as much desire, seek the divine help of the Holy Spirit, 
 promised by God to those who daily and nightly invoke Him. 
 Comp. also Socinus, Opp. i. 344 ; Ostorodt, Unterricht. S. 2, 
 426 ; and the references in Bengel, xv. 115. 
 
 V. QUAKER. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. x. 19 : For all that which man, by his own 
 industry, learning, and knowledge in the languages, can inter- 
 pret of the Scriptures, "or find out, is nothing without the 
 Spirit ; we cannot be certain, but may still miss of the sense 
 of it : whereas a poor man, that knoweth not a letter, when 
 he heareth the Scriptures read, by the same Spirit he can say, 
 This is true; and by the same Spirit he can understand, open, 
 and interpret it, if need be. ... iii. 4 : And therefore He 
 [Christ] gave them His Spirit as their principal guide, which 
 neither moths nor time can wear out, nor transcribers nor 
 translators corrupt ; while none are so young, none so illite- 
 rate, none in so remote a place, but that they may come to be 
 reached and rightly informed by it. Through and by the clear- 
 ness which that Spirit gives us, it is that we are only best rid 
 of those difficulties that occur to us concerning the Scriptures.
 
 56 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 General EemarTcs. 
 
 According to the early theologians, the Church uttered her infallible 
 declarations through the collective episcopate, legitimately assembled in 
 one oecumenical council (ecclesia reprcesentans). Bellarmin. Eccl. Mil. 
 c. xiv., says : Our opinion is that the Church cannot possibly err, 
 neither in things absolutely necessary, nor in others which she pro- 
 poses to our faith and duty, whether they are expressly declared in 
 Scripture or not ; and when we say that the Church cannot err, we 
 understand that as well of the whole body of the faithful as of the 
 whole body of the episcopate. But the latter are, as we say, the 
 ecclesia reprcesentiva. Cf. Cani Loci, 5; Mb'hler, Symbolik, 37 ; Klee, 
 kath. Dogm. i. 246. According to Bellarmine, Cone. i. 4, an recu- 
 menical council is that " cui interesse possunt et debent episcopi totius 
 orbis, nisi legitime impediantur, et cui nemo recte preesidet, nisi 
 Summus pontifex aut alius ejus nomine." l In such a council the 
 bishops decide as judges (judices), for they alone have ordinarily the 
 jus suffragii ; while others are in the council only ex privilegio et con- 
 suetudinp, or as learned co-assessors giving their aid. Bellarmine, I.e. 
 i. 15. [Of late the Roman Catholic Church has receded from these 
 principles of Bellarmine. Comp. the Encyclical of 8th December 
 1864, Atque silentio prceterire non possiimus.] Compare with this the 
 fundamental principles of the Greek Church, Con/, orthod. pp. 18, 
 122, 153; Dosithei Conf. c. xii.; Jerem. in Act. Wirt. p. 139; Plato, 
 Catech. S. 118. The orthodox Greek Church reckons such ecumeni- 
 cal councils seven: the Council of Nicaea, 325 ; Constantinople, 381 ; 
 Ephesus, 431 ; Chalcedon, 451 ; Constantinople, 553, and again 680 
 (Trullanum) ; Nicaea again, 787. The Roman Catholic, on the other 
 hand, acknowledges eighteen general synods accepted by Popes, 
 among which that of Trent was [till lately] the last ; Bellarm. Condi. 
 i. 5. About some of these, however, the Romanists themselves are 
 not agreed. The Protestant Church has given no symbolical decision 
 as to the number of the oecumenical councils ; but comp. Decl. Thor. 
 p. 45, and Baumgarten, Polem. iii. 395. The idea of universal synods, 
 in which an utterance is made by good and learned men from Holy 
 Scripture on points of difference that may have arisen as to faith and 
 truth, is one that is not alien to the Protestant Church : it is well 
 known that the Evangelicals long and earnestly appealed to a free 
 universal council (Aug. Conf. p. 7; Artt. Sm. p. 300). The symbols 
 which touch upon this point distinguish, however, between the ideal 
 
 1 See, however, for the relation, contested even among the Eomanists, be- 
 tween the Pope and the (Ecumenical Council, Marheinecke, Katholicismus, ii. 206. 
 "Walter, Kirchenrecht, S. 306 ; Klee, kath. Dogm. i. 248, have recently ascribed 
 to the Pope as Primus the convoking, the precedence, and the approval of the 
 decrees of the council.
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 57 
 
 and the reality (Conf.Wirt. p. 134; Thirty -nine Artt. xxi. ; Conf. Scot. 
 xx. ; Calvin, Institt. iv. 9. 13 ; Conf. Eemonst. 25), and reject every 
 authority co-ordinate with that of Holy Scripture. It is certain that 
 in practice the idea has never been carried out, and that it could not 
 be carried out without many inconveniences. 
 
 III. DIVERGENCES OF LESS IMPOET IN EELATION 
 TO SCEIPTUEE. 
 
 1. If the Holy Scripture, and especially the New Testa- 
 ment, be a written revelation, it follows that all which it 
 contains as dogma, interpreted by a correct exposition, is an 
 element of the Christian revelation. Eeason, therefore, has 
 no prerogative of distinguishing in the material which, as 
 constituting the Bible, lies before it ; of so dividing, namely, 
 that what reason could not of itself discover, would therefore 
 not be part of the Christian dogma. And in this matter all 
 the Christian symbols agree ; the Socinians forming, in the 
 estimate of many, the one exception (Baumgarten, Polemik, iii. 
 196; Mosheim, Institt. Just. ccc. 820; Schrockh, KG. n. d. E. v. 
 560). But that even they do not in thesi make reason the 
 absolute judge in matters of the Christian faith, is evident 
 from the distinction they draw between those mysteries in 
 revelation which are against and those which are above 
 reason. It also follows from their ancient view of the 
 inability of the reason to discern God and His will. 1 They 
 admit only a negative right in reason to test a revelation pre- 
 sented as divine, and teach that nothing in Christendom or 
 Christian truth may contradict reason. In exegetical practice, 
 however, they apply this fundamental principle to all passages 
 of Scripture which contain the supra-rational, or the so-called 
 
 1 Socinus, Opp. ii. 454. Man himself, of himself, cannot know either himself, 
 or God or His will : it is necessary, on the other hand, that God should reveal 
 these things to him by some reason. Ostorodt, Unterr. S. 10. That man knows 
 anything of God or divinity is not from nature, nor from observation of the 
 creation, but from the tradition of what God has from the beginning revealed to 
 man. But those have not heard this voice who have entertained an indifferent 
 thought about any divinity at all. Cf. especially Socinus, Prcelect. Theol. cap. 
 2. How the Socinians have fallen away from this higher view, see in Zerrenner.
 
 58 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 mysteries of the symbolical Christian faith. For, according to 
 their notions, mysteries of faith, once revealed, must be com- 
 prehensible by reason ; * and thus, in fact, the Socinian exegesis 
 of Scripture is governed by reason, and is constantly subject 
 to violent distortions in interpretation. 2 Compare, generally, 
 J. J. C. Zerrenner, Neuer Versuch, Jena 1820. 
 
 2. The precise relation of the Latin version known as the Vul- 
 gate to the original, as established -by the Tridentine Synod, has 
 been matter of controversy. The words of the decree (sess. iv. 
 deer, de edit, et usu S. S.) run thus : Synodus, considerans non 
 parum utilitatis accedere posse ecclesiae dei, si ex omnibus 
 latinis editionibus, quse circumferuntur, sacrorum librorum, 
 qusenam pro authentic^, habenda sit, innotescat, statuit et de- 
 clarat, ut haec ipsa vetus et vulgata editio, quse longo tot ssecu- 
 lorum usu in ipsa ecclesia probata est, in publicis lectionibus, 
 disputationibus,praedicationibus et expositionibus pro authentica 
 habeatur et ut nemo earn rejicere quovis praetextu audeat vel 
 praesumat. At the first glance, it might appear as if the 
 Council would merely say that, if a Latin version was to be 
 used (as in the divine service), the Vulgate alone among all 
 those extant was to be regarded as having sanction for the 
 Church : at least in these words no definite antithesis is 
 established between it and the original There is, however, 
 undoubtedly in the permission to use the Latin translation in 
 all theological controversies (disputationibus), a certain under- 
 valuation of the original text which was not to be expected 
 from the representatives of the Church. And, in fact, the 
 transactions of the Council which preceded the decrees show 
 that the Tridentine Fathers aimed to establish the authenticity 
 of the Vulgate, the original being left in the background, in 
 order to obtain an advantage in disputes with the Protestants, 
 who appealed always to that original ; or, as it follows in 
 the immediate sequel of the decree, to restrain petulantia in- 
 genia, and to obviate such interpretations of Scripture as de- 
 
 1 Schlichting, Dlss. de Trinitate, p. 70 : Mysteria divina, divine mysteries, 
 are so called, not because as revealed they transcend our intelligence and appre- 
 hension, but because they cannot be known otherwise than by revelation. 
 
 * Cf. e.g. Cat. Eac. qu. 89, 97, 111, 392. As to Socinus' exegetical maxims 
 in reference to many biblical sentences, see De Chnsto servatore, iii. 7. Cf. 
 Bengel in Siiskind'a Mag. xv. 132.
 
 THE SOUECE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 59 
 
 % 
 
 parted from the mind of the Church. 1 Finally, many even of 
 the most orthodox Eomish theologians have so understood the 
 decree as to make the Vulgate dogmatically as trustworthy as 
 the original ; and even the Church (in general councils 2 ) might 
 establish its decisions by appeal to the Vulgate. 3 Recently it 
 has been attempted to explain away every allusion in the 
 decree to the original ; or, since the plain words of it cannot 
 be forced, to interpret the whole as a merely provisional dis- 
 ciplinary enactment for a good purpose. 4 An antithesis of the 
 Tridentine sanction of the Vulgate is found in the Declar. 
 Thorun. ii. 1. 4. 
 
 3. On the reading of Scripture by the laity the Eoman 
 symbols have nothing definitive. The Popes, however, have 
 repeatedly interdicted it, especially Innocent in. (Concil. Tolos. 
 1229), and Clement xi. in the Bull Unigenitus (1713). Pius 
 VII. disapproved of the use of Bible translations which had not 
 the sanction of the Eoman chair ; and the Index lib. prohil. 
 
 1 [Jud. le Plat, Monumentorum ad liisloriam condlil Tridentini, Lovanii 1783.] 
 Cf. Schrockh, KG. iv. 132 ; Marheinecke, System der Kalliol. i. 231. 
 
 2 The decree does not mention the acts of councils in which the Church herself 
 sits in judgment. But Bellarmine, de verbo del, ii. 10, says with great simplicity: 
 In the general councils of the Church there are but few, sometimes no, men 
 skilled in Hehrew ; it would be a bad thing for the Church if on grave questions 
 she could not confide in the Latin version, etc. ; and from what Canus says, ii. 
 15, de linguarum hebr. et grcecce utilitate, it may be gathered how orthodox 
 Catholic theologians regard the use of the original as compared with that of the 
 Vulgate. 
 
 3 According to this, the Vulgate was on a level of itself with the original, and 
 only in and by the use made of it had the pre-eminence. The decree is not that 
 the truths of faith may be more surely known from the Vulgate than from the 
 original (the Church never asserted that), but that they may be known with 
 equal assurance, and.therefore that the Church adhered to the Vulgate because 
 it was in more general use and better understood. Accordingly the old Pro- 
 testant polemics addressed themselves to the task of showing that the Vulgate, 
 as compared with the original, was corrupt. Chemnitz, Exam. 1, i. 7, 13 ; 
 Sixt. Amama, Censura Vulgates et a Tridentlnis canonizalw (!) versionis Pentat., 
 Franeq. 1628. See also the same author's Antibarbarus Bibl., Amst. 1628, in 
 answer to which Bellarmine, de verbo dei, ii. 12, sought to make out that the 
 Vulgate is free from errors. Still more successfully the old polemics pointed to 
 the discrepancy between the Clement, and Sixtine authentic editions. Cf. James, 
 JBettum papale, London 1600. 
 
 4 Cf. L. van Ess. Pragm. doctor, cath. Trid. circa Vulgatam decreti sensum 
 nee non licitum textus origin, usum testantium historia, Sulzbach 1816 ; Herber, 
 de Vers. Lat. Vulg. ex cone. Trid. decreto authentic^, Vratis. 1815.
 
 60 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 which Pius iv. issued makes the reading of (Catholic) transla- 
 tions of Scripture dependent on the permission of the pastors and 
 heads of monasteries. However, there have never been want- 
 ing prelates and theologians of the Eomish Church who have 
 desired to make the reading of the Bible as common as pos- 
 sible, proceeding from the principle, Lectio S. S. cst pro omnibus. 
 But in consequence of the other principle predominant in 
 that Church, of the essential obscurity of Scripture, it is per- 
 fectly consistent that but little stress is laid upon the indivi- 
 dual and private reading of the Bible on the part of the laity, 
 and that the common people are referred mainly to the oral 
 instruction of the clergy : Bellarmine, de vcrbo dei, ii. 15. 
 The Greek Church never made Scripture accessible to the 
 laity. In their divine service it is still read in a language 
 not understood by the people, and translations have till lately 
 not been widely diffused. The Synod of Jerusalem, in 1672, 
 was made to utter a condemnation of the reading of Scripture 
 by the laity: Harduin, Condi, xi. 255. Even the Quakers 
 attach little importance to the private reading of the Bible, 
 since the people are always dependent upon the correctness of 
 the translation, which they themselves are not able to decide 
 upon : see Barclay, Prop. iii. The learned themselves derive, 
 according to them, no real advantage from reading the word of 
 God, if they are destitute of the true internal light. If the 
 Protestant Church is zealous in putting the Scriptures into 
 the hands of the laity, it is under the full conviction that the 
 proper clearness of the original is unimpaired in those passages 
 which make up the constituent elements of necessary faith. 
 
 4. The Eoman Catholics reckon as part of Holy Scripture, 
 besides the canonical books, the so-called Apocrypha (that is, 
 Tobit, Judith, Ecclesiasticus, Wisdom of Solomon, 1 and 2 
 Maccabees, Baruch, parts of Esther, the Hymn of the Three, 
 Susannah, Bel and the Dragon), and ascribe to them divine 
 authority, appointing portions of them to be read at certain 
 festivals; cf. Cone. Trid. sess. iv. dec. 1. It is true that 
 many Eomish theologians make an historical distinction be- 
 tween the canonical and apocryphal books, terming the former 
 proto-canonical, and the latter deutero-canonical (see Jahn, 
 Einleitung, i. 140). But the Church takes no notice of any
 
 THE SOURCE OF CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE. 61 
 
 such distinction, which indeed is of itself without any signi- 
 ficance for dogmatics. How it came to pass that the Triden- 
 tine Synod denied the distinction already existing in the 
 Jewish Church between the canonical and the apocryphal 
 books, is matter of fruitless conjecture. It was the long 
 prevalent custom in the Latin Church to use the canonical 
 books and the non-canonical promiscuously ; and there was a 
 desire (not without the influence of doctrinal bias) to be 
 faithful to the old habit. In the Lutheran symbols there is 
 found no decided negative, though they do in fact declare 
 the canonical books alone to be dogmatically binding : Bret- 
 schneider, Dogmatik, cap. 1 ; Gonf. Gall. iii. 4 ; Conf. Belg. 6 : 
 libri apocryphi, quos quidem ecclesia legere et ex iis docu- 
 menta de rebus cum libris canonicis consentientibus desumere 
 potest : at nequaquam ea ipsorum vis et auctoritas est, ut ex 
 ullo testimonio ipsorum aliquod dogma . . . certo constitui 
 possit. Dec. Thorun. p. 46, Conf. Remon. i. 6, and the Conf. 
 Gall., the English Article vi., the Conf. Remonst. i. 3, give ex- 
 press lists of the canonical books of the Old Testament. The 
 Socinians also (Ostorodt, Untcrr.}, and the Mennonites (Eis, 
 Conf. c. 29), agree in this with the Protestant Churches. 
 Barclay mentions the exclusion of the Apocrypha from the 
 collection of the divinely-inspired books, but only in passing, 
 and as an historical fact. 
 
 Metrophanes Critop. Conf. c. 7, attests, for the Greek 
 Church, that it assigned no canonical authority to the Old 
 Testament Apocrypha. " As to the other books, which some 
 would combine together with the Holy Scriptures, such as 
 Tobit and the like, we do not hold that they are to be rejected, 
 for they hold much that is moral and worthy of all praise. 
 But as canonical and authentic they were not formerly re- 
 ceived by the Church of Christ. . . . Wherefore we do not seek 
 to establish our dogmas by them, but from the three-and- 
 thirty canonical and authentic books, which we call the in- 
 spired and holy Scripture." On the other hand, the Apocrypha 
 are placed in co-ordination with the canonical books by the 
 Synod at Jerusalem, 1672, [at least according to] Harduin, 
 Condi, xi. 258. 
 
 5. As to the inspiration of Holy Writ, the Racovian Cate-
 
 62 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 chism does not speak expressly ; it aims merely to demonstrate 
 the certitudo S. S. Socinus, however, not only admits that 
 the apostles, in the announcement of doctrines necessary to 
 salvation, enjoyed a special guidance of the Divine Spirit 1 
 (which therefore would not fail them in writing), but says of 
 them that they wrote certain things " vel ab ipso div. spiritu 
 impulsi eoque dictante vel spiritu sancto pleni ; " and even in 
 the Eacovian Catechism there occur traces here and there of 
 a faith in inspiration. See Zerrenner, Newer Versuch, etc., S. 
 132-198. In the Conf. Bemonst. i. 3, the authors of the 
 canonical books are said to be spiritu dei sancto afflati, instructi 
 et dvrecti. In the Form. Cons. Helv. ii. 1, moreover, we have 
 an assertion of the inspired character of the Hebrew vowels. 
 
 1 Socini Opp. i. 3746 : Apostolos in iis, quse ad seternam salutem omnino 
 pertinent, errare non potuisse et ratio manifesto et Christi apertissima verba 
 atque promissa plane demonstrant.
 
 It 
 THE TEINITY. 
 
 ALL Christian communities agree that God is in His nature 
 one ; but the great majority acknowledge, according to the 
 definitions of the ancient Church, in this one divine essence 
 three persons or hypostases, inseparably united, co-equal in 
 eternity and perfection. They separate to some extent from the 
 Arminians, who, because the Son is generated, and the Spirit 
 proceeds eternally from the Father, teach a subordination among 
 the three Persons ; and they differ wholly from the anti-Trinita- 
 rians or Socinians, who, denying the Trinity in the divine essence, 
 hold the supreme and only God, who is one in essence, to be 
 one in person also, and regard Christ as only a man exalted to 
 divine majesty (a God who became such in time : Osterodt, 
 S. 65), and that which the Scripture calls the Holy Ghost as 
 merely the power of God efficient in the sanctification of men. 
 In the symbols of the Quakers, the doctrine of the Trinity is 
 not exhibited as such ; nor are the biblical passages which 
 touch on the Trinity in the divine essence ever collected. 
 All is reduced to the one declaration in Proposition ii. of 
 Barclay : No man knoweth the Father but the Son, and he 
 to whom the Son revealeth Him ; the revelation of the Son is 
 in and by the Spirit. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I EOMISH AND PKOTESTANT. 
 
 As the declarations of the Eoman Catholic and Protestant 
 symbols alike and almost literally coincide with, or as com-
 
 64 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ments arise out of, the statements of the ancient O3cumenical 
 symbols, which symbols themselves, moreover, have been ac- 
 cepted generally by the Protestants, it is unnecessary to set 
 those statements in order here. Comp. however, Gennadius, Conf. 
 art. 3 ; Mctrop. Critop. 1 ; Conf. orth. i. qu. 8-10 ; Aug. Conf. 
 1 ; Appl. p. 50 ; Artt. Sm. p. 303 ; Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 3 ; Conf. 
 Gall. art. 6 ; Eng. Artt. 1-3 ; Conf. Bdg. art. 8. As to the 
 Mennonites, comp. Eis, Conf. artt 2 and 3. 
 
 IT. SOCINIAX. 
 1. The Trinity generally. 
 
 Cat. Eac. p. 31 : Qui fit, ut Christian! non solum patrem, 
 verum etiam filium et spiritum sanctum personas esse in una 
 deitate vulgo statuant ? Graviter in eo errant, argumenta 
 ejus rei afferentes e scripturis male intellectis. 
 
 2. Deity of Christ. 
 
 Ib. p. 32 : Vox dcus duobus potissimum modis in scripturis 
 usurpatur : prior est, cum designat ilium, qui in coelis et in 
 terra omnibus ita dominatur et prseest, ut neminem superiorem 
 agnoscat . . . atque in hac significatione scriptura unum esse 
 deum asserit. Posterior modus est, cum eum denotat, qui 
 potestateni aliquam sublimem ab uno illo deo habet aut deitatis 
 unius illius dei aliquS, ratione particeps est. Etenim in scrip- 
 turis propterea deus ille unus deus deorum vocatur. Psalm. L 1. 
 Et hac quidem posteriore ratione filius dei vocatur deus in 
 quibusdam scripturse locis. 
 
 Ib. p. 48 : An praeter humanam Ch. naturam s. substantiam 
 non agnoscis etiam in eo divinam ? Siquidem hoc loco naturae 
 divinae nomine ipsam dei essentiam intelligimus, non agnos- 
 cimus hoc sensu divinam in Ch. naturam, cum id non solum 
 ration! sacra verum etiam divinis literis repugnet. 
 
 Ib. p. 58 : Si Chr. ex essentia patris genitus fuisset, aut 
 partem essentise sumsisset aut totam. Essentias partem sumere 
 non potuit eo quod sit impartibilis essentia divina, neque 
 totam, nam hac ratione pater desiisset esse pater . . . adde 
 quod cum ess. div. sit una numero ac proinde incommunicabilis, 
 fieri istud nullo pacto potuit (after the latest revision).
 
 THE TRINITY. 65 
 
 Ib. p. 47 : Non solum est Ch. filius del unigenitus . . . sed 
 etiam propter divin. turn potentiam ac virtutem turn ancfcori- 
 tatem ac potestatem, quae in eo adhuc mortal! eluxit, jam turn 
 dens fuit, multo magis nunc, postquam omnem in coelo et in 
 terra potestatem accepit et omnia deo solo excepto ejus pedibus 
 sunt subjecta (wanting in first edition). 
 
 II}. p. 50: Quidqnid divinnm Chr. habet, scriptura eum 
 patris dono habere aperte docet. 
 
 Jo. p. 164: Primp praecepto Jes. addidit id, quod ipsum 
 Jesum pro eo, qui in nos potestatem habeat divinam istoque 
 sensu pro deo agnoscere . . . ac divinum ei honorem exhibere 
 tenemur. 
 
 Ib. qu. 237: (Honor divinns Christo debitus consistit) in 
 eo, quod, quemadmodum adoratione divina eum prosequi 
 tenemur, ita in omnibus necessitatibus nostris ejus opem im- 
 plorare possumus. Adoramus vero eum propter ipsius sub- 
 limem et divinam ejus potestatem. 
 
 Ib. qu. 245 : (Is honor et cultus Christo tribuitur, ut inter 
 Christum et deum discrimen) permagnum sit. Nam adoramus 
 et colimns deum tanquam causam primam salutis nostrse, 
 Christum tanquam secundam : aut, ut cum Paulo (1 Cor. viii. 
 6) loquamur, deum tanquam eum ex quo omnia, Christum nt 
 eum per quern omnia. 
 
 Thus the Socinian doctrine as to the deity of Christ is in 
 its connection this : The man Jesus, who, born as the Son of 
 God, accomplished the purposes of God on earth for the salva- 
 tion of men, was by God exalted in the ascension to almighty 
 dominion over His Church (the people of God), and therefore 
 over the whole world. Consequently He was exalted to a 
 participation in the divine glory, and in this state Christ may 
 receive, as God, adoration or worship. Christ is not naturd 
 Deus ; did not from eternity pre-exist with God ; never be- 
 came participant ipsius essentice divings (which is absolutely 
 indivisible and incommunicable) ; and all the divine that He 
 possesses He received as the gift of God. (A contention 
 arose between Socinus and others, especially the Siebenburg 
 Unitarians, as to the divine honour to be paid to Christ. On 
 this, consult the tractates of Socinus in the Bibl. Frat. Polon. 
 ii 709 sqq. The Summa theol. Unit, agrees generally with the 
 
 E
 
 66 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 views of Socinus. But on what ground does Hase assert, 
 K. G. S. 593, that the English Unitarians have renounced the 
 worship of Christ ?) 
 
 3. Divine Personality of the Holy Ghost. 
 
 Cat. Eacov. qu. 80 : Sp. s. nusquam in s. s. vocatur expresse 
 deus. Quia vero quibusdam locis ea attribuit ipsi scriptura, 
 quae dei sunt, non eo facit ac si ipse vel deus sit vel persona 
 divinitatis. 
 
 IT), qn. 371 : Sp. s. non esse in deitate personam, hinc 
 dicere potes, primum, quod ea, quse Spiritui s. in scripturis 
 attribuuntur, nulla prorsus ratione personse conveniant, ut sunt : 
 quod detur, quod ex eo detur idque aut secundum mensuram 
 aut absque omni mensur&, quod effundatur ipse et ex ipso 
 effundatur et quod eo potentur homines, quod augeatur, in 
 duplo detur, in partes distribuatur, tollatur ipse et ex ipso 
 tollatur, quod interdum sit, interdum non sit, denique quod 
 exstinguatur, et similia in scripturis exstant (Act. v. 32, cet.). 
 Deinde idem ex eo patet, quod non sit extra deum natura, sed 
 in ipso deo. . . . Quoniam vero Sp. s. in deo est, nee tamen in 
 Spiritu s. reciproce dici potest esse deum, hinc apparet, Sp. s. 
 non esse personam. 
 
 F. Soc. breviss. inst. p. 652 b : Quid de Spiritu sancto dicis ? 
 Nempe ilium non esse personam aliquam a deo, cujus est 
 spiritus, distinctam, sed tantummodo (ut nomen ipsum spiritus, 
 quod flatum et afflationem, ut sic loquar, significat, docere 
 potest) ipsius dei vim et efficaciam quandam, i e. earn, quse 
 secum sanctitatem aliquam afferat cet. 1 
 
 III. ARMENIAN. 
 
 The Conf. Remonst. c. 3 says nothing of a subordination , 
 expresses itself on this subject with very great prudence ; and 
 expressly ascribes to the Holy Spirit also a communicatio 
 deitatis db cetemo. 
 
 Episcopius, Inst. Theol. iv. 2. 32, p. 333 : Sed addo, certum 
 esse ex scripturis, personis his tribus divmitatem divinasque 
 
 1 Cf. Soc. Bibl. Fr. Pol. ii. 455 ; Tr. de Deo, Christo et Sp. ; Ostorodt, 
 Untenicht, c. iv. 6 ; Crell, de uno Deo patre.
 
 THE TRINITY. 67 
 
 pevfectiones tribui non collateraliter aut co-ordinate, sed sub- 
 ordinate, ita ut pater solus naturam istam divinam et perfec- 
 tiones istas divinas a se habeat sive a nullo alio, filius auteni 
 et Spiritus sanctus a patre : ac proinde pater divinitatis omnis, 
 quae in filio et Spiritu sancto est, fons ac principium sit. . . . 
 Dignius autem est, esse a nullo, quam esse ab alio, et generare, 
 quam generari, spirare quam spirari cet. 
 
 Limborch, Theol. Christ, ii. 17, sec. 25 : Colligimus, essen- 
 tiam divinam et filio et Spiritui sancto esse communem. Sed 
 et non minus constat, inter tres hasce personas subordinationem 
 esse quandam, quatenus pater naturam divinam a se habet, 
 filius et Spiritus sanctus a patre, qui proinde divinitatis in 
 filio et Spiritu sancto fons est et principium. Communis 
 christianorum consensus ordinis ratione prserogativani hanc 
 agnoscit, patri semper tribuens primum locum, secundum filio, 
 tertium Spiritui sancto. Sed est et qusedam supereminentia 
 patris respectu filii, et patris ac filii respectu Spiritus sancti, 
 ratione dignitatis ac potestatis. Dignius siquidem est gene- 
 rare quam generari, spirare quam spirari cet. 
 
 DIFFERENCES OF LESS MOMENT. 
 
 The Greek Church teaches, following John xv. 26, that the 
 Holy Ghost proceeds only from the Father. But the Eoman 
 Catholic and Protestant Churches, including the Mennonites 
 and Arminians, teach, with the Nicene and Athanasian sym- 
 bols, in harmony with the orthodox view of the essential rela- 
 tion of the Father and the Son in the holy Trinity, that He 
 proceeds from the Father and the Son together. See Cat. Eom. 
 i. 9. 6 (cf. Klee, Dogm. ii. 182); Form. Cone. p. 781; Conf. 
 Hdv. ii 3 ; Conf. Gall. art. 6 ; Eng. Artt. ii ; Conf. Belg. art. 
 xi. ; Conf. Eem. iii. 2 ; Eis, Conf. Menn. art. 3. The passage 
 in the Greek formulary is as follows : Si8aoveet [eV/cX^crta] TraJ? 
 TO Trvevpa TO ayiov eKTropeverat, eic povov rov Trarpos, co? ^77777? 
 KOI a/o^? TT)? 0eoV7T09. More explicit statements are found 
 in Metrop. Critop. c. i. 11 ; Jerem. in Actis Wirt. pp. 57, 200. 
 Cf. Zernicav. Tract, de Process. Sp. s. a solo patre, Eegiom. 1774 ; 
 Th. Procopowitz, de Process. Sp., Goth. 1772.
 
 III. 
 
 CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN; INVOCATION OF SAINTS; 
 VENERATION OF PICTURES AND RELICS. 
 
 POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 ALL Christian Churches agree that to God alone belongs 
 adoration. But the Papists and Greeks connect with this an 
 invocation and reverence of angels and saints that is, of the 
 dead who for their sanctity have already attained to their 
 felicity in God l as intercessors with God ; and they believe 
 that even the pictures and the relics of these saints should 
 be reverenced. The more this part of the Roman dogmatics 
 has been contested, 2 the more necessary does it become to let 
 the symbols themselves speak which declare the Church's 
 doctrine ; so that we may separate what is merely the super- 
 stition of the crowd from the dogma which the Church itself 
 holds and decrees. 
 
 1 Bellarmini de JBeatitud. sanct. cap. 1 : The spirits of pious men, who are 
 released from the body and need no purgation, but are already admitted to the 
 fruition of blessedness which consists in the clear vision of God. The Tridentine 
 expression says the same thing : una cum Christo regnantes. 
 
 2 The Romanists are themselves partly responsible for this : for, to intercedere 
 precibus is added by the canon missce and Bellarmin (i. 17) the word mentis, 
 which, however easily explicable on the principles of the Romish doctrine, must 
 needs suggest to Protestants the idea that independent merits are meant which 
 are co-ordinate with the merits of Christ. See Apol. Aug. Conf. p. 227 ; 
 Chemnitz, Exam. Cone. Trid. iii. 4. 2. The remarks of Bellarmine, de Imay* 
 Sanct. ii. 21, are very objectionable to the Protestant mind. 
 
 68
 
 CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN, ETC. 69 
 
 I. INVOCATION OF SAINTS. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. KOMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 25, Deer. d. invocat. sanctor: (Doceant 
 episcopi), sanctos una cum Christo regnantes orationes suas 
 pro hominibus deo offerre (cf. Trid. sess. 22, cap. 3), bonum 
 atque utile esse, suppliciter eos invocare et ob beneficia impe- 
 tranda a deo per filium ejus Jesum Christum, qui solus noster 
 redemtor et salvator est, ad eorum orationes, opem, auxiliumque 
 confugere ; illos vero, qui negant, sanctos aeterna felicitate in 
 ccelo fruentes invocandos esse, aut qui asserunt, vel illos pro 
 hominibus non orare, vel eorum, ut pro nobis etiam singulis 
 orent, invocationem esse idololatriam, vel pugnare cum verbo 
 dei adversarique honori unius mediatoris dei et hominum Jesti 
 Christi, vel stultum esse, in coelo regnantibus voce vel mente 
 supplicare, impie sentire. 
 
 Cat Rom. iii. 2.10: Invocandi sunt (angeli), quod et per- 
 petuo deum intuentur et patrocinium salutis nostrse sibi delatum 
 libentissime suscipiunt. Exstant divinse scripturse testimonia 
 hujus invocationis. 
 
 Ib. iv. 5. 8 : Jure ecclesia gratiarum actioni preces etiam et 
 implorationem sanctissimse dei matris adjunxit ; qua pie atque 
 suppliciter ad earn confugeremus, ut nobis peccatoribus sua" 
 intercessione conciliaret deum, bonaque turn ad hanc turn ad 
 seternam vitam necessaria impetraret. Ergo nos . . . assidue 
 misericordise matrem ac fidelis populi advocatam invocare de- 
 bemus, ut oret pro nobis peccatoribus, ab eaque hac prece opem 
 et auxilium implorare, cujus et preestantissima merita apud 
 deum esse et summam voluntatem juvandi humanum genus, 
 nemo nisi impie et nefarie dubitare potest. 
 
 Tb. iii. 2. 8 : Docendum est, venerationem et invocationem 
 sanctorum angelorum ac beatarum animarum, quse crelesti 
 gloria perfruuntur, . . . huic legi (de uno deo colendo) non 
 repugnare. Quis enim adeo deniens est, qui edicente rege, ne 
 se pro rege quisquam gerat aut regio cultu atque honore affici 
 patiatur, continuo putet nolle regem, suis ut magistratibus
 
 70 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 honos deferatur ? Etsi enim angelos christiani adorare dicnntur 
 exemplo sanctorum veteris testament!, non earn tamen illis 
 venerationem adhibent, quam deo tribuunt. Quodsi legimus 
 interdum angelos recusasse, ne se homines venerarentur, eo 
 fecisse intelligendum est, quod sibi eum honorem haberi nole- 
 bant, qui soli deo deberetur. 
 
 Cf. Conf. A. C. p. 89 seq. ; Eck, Loci, cap. 14 ; Bellarm. de 
 Ecc. triumph, lib. i. ; Becan. Man. controv. i 7 ; Bossuet, Ex. 
 Doct. Cath. c. 4 ; Sailer, Ecc. Cath. de cult. sand. 
 
 [Pius IX., in his Encyclical of 2d February 1849 : Optime 
 enim nostis, venerabiles fratres, omnem fiducice nostrce rationcm 
 in sanctissima virgine esse collocatam; quandoquidem Deus totius 
 boni plenitudinem posuit in Maria, ut proinde, si quid spei 
 in nobis est, si quid gratise, si quid salutis, ab ea noverimus 
 redundare, quia sic est voluntas ejus, qui totum nos habere 
 voluit per Mariam.] 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 7 7 : "E^owi %pe'o9 oXot ol opdoSogoi, va rr/z/ 
 (Mapiav) So^d^ovffi TrpeTrov/jLeva /col va rrjv ev\a{3ovvrai, <b<; 
 fjL-rjTepa rov fcvplov fjn&v 'Irjaov Xpiarov ff fuiXkov elTretv, to? 
 
 deOTOKOV. 
 
 H). p. 317: 'ETruca\ovfjie0a rrjv fieaireiav T&V ayiwv TT/OO? 
 rov Beov, &ia va Trapa/caXoucrt 8t' r^fia^' /cal iiriKd\o\)^Qa avrovs, 
 o-fti a>5 6eov<; rivas, aXV &><? <f)i\ov$ avrov' rov OTTOLOV SOV\VOV<TI, 
 xal rov OTTolov Soj~o\oyov<ri teal \arpevova~i,' KOI %peiaofi0a 
 rr)v fiorfdeidv rov?, o^t a>? av vd /MI? ef3or)0ova-av eiceivoi diro rrjv 
 eSiKrjV TOU? Svvapiv fia Start fyjrovffiv t9 ^/xa? rrjv ")(dpiv rov 
 6eov /Lie rat9 TrpecvSewus rou9. 
 
 Ib. p. 3 2 1 : 'Aicofju, TOUS dyy&ow eVt/caXoy/Ae^a va ftemfnvovfft 
 fie rat? Trpoaracriais roy? irrrep TUJLWV rcpos rov Beov Siarl etcelvot, 
 7rpo(T<f>epov<nv et? rrjv rov 0eov fJLya\ei6ri)ra ra? Trpocreu^a? /cat 
 \er)[j,o(rvva<; KO\ rrdvra ra Ka\a epya rwv dvOpuyjrwv ol Se 
 cvyioi fj^ra Odvarov elvai w<nrp a-yyeXot, /cat rjfnropovcn rare va 
 
 rat? ^peuit9 /^a9, Ka va 
 
 KOI va (j.ea'ireuova'iv inrep TJIMWV. airo TO OTTOLOV 
 favepov, 7r<u9 i7/tet9 Bev evavriov/jieda 19 rrjv evro\r)v rov deov, 
 /ie TO va 7rapaica\ovfiev rov<; dylov? ol orroloi cvyiot a>9
 
 CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN, ETC. 71 
 
 BovXoi irapecrrwres et9 rrjv rov deov aeya'hoTrpeTreiav, fteo-irevovo-i 
 oy povov d\tj0ivbv deov ad\io-ra ay Kara- 
 rrjv fjieo-iretav rwv dylwv irapo^vvofiev ra aeyio-ra 
 rrjv Oeiav fjieyaXeiortjra^ Sev rifjiwvres TOU9 etXt/cpty9 &ov\ev- 
 <ravra<; avry. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. cap. 17, p. 132: Ael /cal rots 
 dyioi? rpoTrov rivd etvai r^9 TWV iroppo) yv(aaQ)<;. . . . "Eanv 
 ovi> avrois rpo7ro9 ovd' iGToplat, our' 7Ti(7ToXat, aXA,' r) airoK.a- 
 Xin|ri? TOU Travaylov 7rz/eu/iaT09 TOW . . . Trdwra etSoTO9 teal 
 TOVTWV ocra /SouXeTat T0t9 TTLO-TOL^ TWV Sov\wv a7roaXu7TTOVT09, 
 tcaKelvovs et9 evTev^iv vjrep TWV Seoftevcov fyeipovros, KOL Ta9 
 TotauTfl9 evTev^eis Kal a7ro8e^o/iei>ou at T\r)povvros. Tovro 
 ovv elSovaa rj rov Xpiarov e/c/cX^cr/a /cat TraXat TOUTOU9 (a<yiov<>) 
 e7reaXetTo /cat /w,e%pt crrj^epov TOVTO Troiet. OvSev erepov irapa 
 TOVTCOV alrovcra, r) TO TTpecr/Sevetv rov irdvra Swdftevov Oeov inrep 
 , 7roXXai9 Q\tyeai /cat dvcu//.aXiat9 TOJ) /Stbu Trept/cu/cXou/iewaz/ 
 tV vrro^jiovriv iv Tat9 OXfyeai Bu> o OiKripjJiwv 0eos teal 
 aTTo rovrwv d7ra\\a<yr)v ev ra^ei. Ov jap \eyo/jiev 7rpo9 
 d<yio)v, ayie GUHTOV, 77 \vrpcoaai, rj Trpovoov fiot dyadd, 
 r] rt roiovrov, ov8a/j,a)<>. (ravra <yap fj,dva> ra> Oe> Svvara, /cal 
 ovftevl aXXw.) dXXa Xeyof^ev ayie O. A. rrpicrfteve inrep 
 "Eri ov \eyofj,ev rovs dyiovs p&rbra/? et9 yap ecrri f^eairri 
 fcal dvOpa>ira>v, dvOpwjros 'Irjo-ovs Xpicrrbs, 09 [iovo<$ 
 Svvarai ra>re irarpl Kal rjfuv pecnreveiv. P. 133: Ov 
 rolvvv TOU9 77877 /j,eraardvra<; dyiovs /caXoO/xez/, dXXa T 
 /cat //ceTa9 TT/jo? Toy 0ebv virep rj^wv dSeX^wv etcelvcov ovrow. 
 Ol 7rpecr/3evoyT69 ou T0t9 auTot9 pr^ao-iv ol<$ Kal o vto9 fJieo-irevtov 
 dXX' aXXot9 TroXu Sia(pepovo~t, T0t5 e/cetVou, /cat 
 rrjv avrtov 7rpo9 Toy #eoz> raTreivorijra Kal Bov\eiav 
 eu<paivov<riv. Cf. Dosithei Confess, c. 8. 
 
 /fo'a 1 . p. 135: 97 Ka6o\tKrj e/c/cXTycr/a 7rX7)y TOV Trp 
 rbv Oebv virep qfioiiv Kal irdvra rdvayKata rjfuv 'Trap' 
 alreiv, ovBevbs aXXou SetTat irapd rov rwv dyiwv, ovSe Trap 
 T^9 dytas OeoroKOV rjv 0)9 /j,ev irdvrwv rwv dyicov 
 Kal 7roXX&> TrXet'oya exelvav rrapprjaiav 7T/309 Toy vlbv 
 Trpwrrjv T<yy aXXcoy eTriKaXovpeda et9 7rpea-/3etay, 019 Se TT} eavrfjs 
 Bvvdaei /^Sey SwafjLewrjv Troirjaai, 7T\r)V rov 7rpeo-/3eveiv^ /cat 
 i7/Ltet9 ou8eyo9 aXXou irapa ravrr)S SeopeQa 7T\r)V rov 
 Kal iKereveiv rbv avrfj<i vlbv Kal debv vrrep r)fj.a>v.
 
 72 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 However, the character of /xecrmu is assigned to the saints, 
 Ada Wirt. p. 128. Plato, in his Catech. S. 15 9, warns against 
 the abuse of the veneration offered to saints. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The foregoing testimonies establish the following propositions: 
 1. The Roman and Greek Churches make a clear distinction between 
 the worship of God (and Christ) and that of the saints. God is 
 prayed to as the independent Author and Giver of all good ; the 
 saints are invoked as the mediators of the divine benevolences, that 
 is, by means of their prayer, addressed to God in the name of 
 Christ: 1 cf. the passage cited above, Cat. Rom. iv. 6. 3. The merit 
 of Christ is declared not to be hereby invaded, 2 inasmuch as the 
 impartation of benefits is not connected with any specific merit of 
 the saints, which before and independently of Christ availed with 
 God, but merely with their intercession, which itself is based on 
 Christ's merit, and is offered in His name. It is not, indeed, of much 
 moment here that the word invocare is used, and not adorare ; for in 
 the Romish ecclesiastical language the adorare is, like preces, just as 
 seldom used as concerning God : cf. Cat. Rom. Hi. 2. 4, Sancti viri 
 . . . reges adorabant; and Bellarm. de Ecc. triumph, ii. 21. 2. The 
 Tridentine Council commands the invocatio sanctorum, not as a reli- 
 gious duty, but as good and wholesome. The Protestant, however, 
 cannot anywhere find the biblical ground of such invocatio ; and, 
 when any intercession with God is in question, will be content with 
 that of Christ, lamenting meanwhile that the Roman Catholic 
 Church, or the Roman Catholic clergy, have not more earnestly 
 sought to obviate the easily possible and actual superstition and abuse 
 of this doctrine. 
 
 The canonized saints receive from the Romish Church public vene- 
 ration : festivals are held in their honour, masses are read, churches 
 are built. The non-canonized it is permitted only in secret to 
 honour : cf. Bellarm. I.e. cap. 10. Canonization is, according to 
 Bellarmine, cap. 7, " nothing more than the public testimony of the 
 Church concerning the true sanctity and glory of any man now 
 dead ; at the same time it is the judgment and opinion by which are 
 decreed the honours due to those who reign in blessedness with God, 
 which are generally held to be seven." The right of canonization 
 the Pope alone now holds. As to this canonization in the Eastern 
 Church, see Heineccius, iii. S. 50. 
 
 1 The distinction is well known between XT/>/ and JawX$/a. Eck. Loc. c. 14 : 
 licet sancti non sint adorandi latria, quia soli deo debetur, tamen venerandi sunt 
 dulia. Cf. Bellarmin. I.e. cap. 12. 
 
 1 According to Mohler, the invocation of saints is itself an honour to Christ
 
 CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN, ETC. 73 
 
 III. PROTESTANT (INCLUDING ARMINIAN AND SOCINIAN). ' 
 
 C. A. art. 21 : De cultu sanctorum decent, quod memoria 
 sanctorum proponi potest, ut imitemur fidem eorum et bona 
 opera juxta vocationem. Sed scriptura non docet invocare 
 sanctos, seu petere auxilium a sanctis, quia unum Christum 
 nobis proponit mediatorem, propitiatorium, pontificem et inter- 
 cessorem. Hie invocandus est et promisit se exauditurum 
 esse preces nostras, et hunc cultum maxime probat. 
 
 Apol. C. A. -p. 223 : Confessio nostra probat honores sanc- 
 torum. . . . Prseterea et hoc largimur, quod angeli orent pro 
 nobis. Exstat enim testimonium Zacharite (i 12), ubi ange- 
 lus orat : Domine exercituum, usque quo tu non miserebaris 
 Jerusalem cet. De sanctis etsi concedimus, quod sicut vivi 
 orant pro ecclesia universa in genere, ita in ccelis orent pro 
 ecclesia in genere, tametsi testimonium nullum de mortuis 
 orantibus exstat in scripturis, praeter illud somnium sumtum 
 ex libro Machabeorum posteriore. Porro ut maxime pro ecclesia 
 orent sancti, tamen non sequitur, quod sint invocandi. Quan- 
 quam confessio nostra hoc tantum affirmat, quod scriptura non 
 doceat sanctorum invocationem, seu petere a sanctis auxilium. 
 Cuni autem neque praeceptum, neque promissio, neque exem- 
 plum ex scripturis de invocandis sanctis afferri possit, sequitur, 
 conscientiam nihil posse certi de ilia invocatione habere. Cf. 
 Conf. Wirtemberg, p. 122 sq. ; and Conf. Bohem. art. 17. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 3 1 : Invocatio sanctorum est etiam pars abusuum 
 et errorum antichristi, pugnans cum primo principali articulo 
 et delens agnitionem Christi. Non etiam est mandata, nee 
 consilio, nee exemplo, nee testimonio scripturae nititur. Omnia 
 in Christo melius et certius nobis sunt proposita, ut non egea- 
 mus invocatione sanctorum, etiamsi res pretiosa esset, cum 
 tamen sit res maxime perniciosa. 
 
 Cat. Racov. p. 173 : An quisquam prseter Chr. colendus sit, 
 doce. Nullo prorsus modo. Nee enim ullum exstat divinum 
 testimonium, ex quo cuiquam . . . hunc honorem a deo datum 
 esse appareat. Quod vero hodie in rom. ecclesia virgini Marias 
 et sanctis defertur, id totum in ipsorum opinione fundatum 
 est. Cf. Ostorodt, Unterriclit. c. 42, S. 424. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 5 : Divos nee contemnimus, nee vulga-
 
 74 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 riter de eis sentinms. Agnoscimus enim eos esse viva Christ! 
 membra, amicos dei, qui carnem et mundum gloriose vicerunt. 
 Diligimus ergo illos ut fratres, et honoramus etiam, non tamen 
 cultu aliquo, sed honorabili de eis existimatione, denique laudi- 
 bus justis. Imitamur item eos. Nam imitatores fidei virtutum- 
 que ipsorum, consortes item seternse salutis esse, illis seternum 
 apud deum cohabitare, et cum eis in Christo exsultare desideriis 
 votisque ardentissimis exoptamus. . . . Honorandi ergo sunt 
 propter imitationem, non adorandi propter religionem cet. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 24 : (Credimus) quidquid homines de mor- 
 tuorum sanctorum intercessione comment! sunt, nihil aliud 
 esse, quam fraudem et fallacias satanae. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 26 : Hie mediator, quern pater inter se et 
 nos constituit, su& majestate haudquaquam nos terrere debet, 
 ut ad alium, arbitrio nostro queerendum, ideo impellat. Nemo 
 enim neque in coslo, neque in terra inter creaturas est, qui nos 
 impensius amet, quam Christus. . . . Sola igitur diffidentia 
 morem hunc induxit, ut sanctos ignominia honoris loco affi- 
 ciant, dum id agunt, quod illi nunquam fecerunt, nee sibi 
 defend postularunt, sed constanter et pro officio suo rejecerunt, 
 sicut ex scriptis eorum patet. Neque hie nostra indignitas 
 praetexenda est. . . . Sciebat enim probe deus, cum hunc nobis 
 daret, peceatores nos esse. 
 
 Against the cultus of Mary is specially decisive Dedar. 
 Thorun. ii. 2, 3. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. xvi. 3 : Prater hunc unicum mediatorem 
 (Christum) alios ullos vel angelos vel homines sive vivos sive 
 mortuos religiose colere i e. plus quam civiliter adorare vel 
 invocare, tanquam scilicet patronos et advocates nostros ap. 
 deum, aut templa, altaria, festa iis consecrare . . . prorsus 
 illicitum deoque ingratum esse statuimus. . . . Memoriam 
 tamen (sanctorum) sancte colendam et virtutes cum praeconio 
 digne celebrandas et ad imitationem . . . proponendas esse 
 jure censemus. (Cf. limborch, Theol. christ. v. 19 ; Sim. 
 Episcop. disput. 15, in a. Opp. ii. ii. 207 sqq.)
 
 CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN, ETC. 75 
 
 II. VENERATION OF PICTURES AND RELICS. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. ROMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 25, Deer, de invoc. sanctor. : (Doceant 
 episcopi) sanctorum quoque martyrom et aliorum cum Christo 
 viventium sancta corpora, quse viva membra fuerunt Christi 
 et templum Spiritus sancti, ab ipso ad seternam vitam susci- 
 tanda et glorificanda, a fidelibus veneranda esse, per quse multa 
 beneficia a deo hominibus prsestantur ; ita ut affirmantes, sanc- 
 torum reliquiis venerationem atque honorem non deberi vel 
 eas aliaque sacra monumenta a fidelibus inutiliter honorari 
 atque eorum opus impetrandae causa sanctorum memorias 
 frustra frequentari, omnino damnandos esse, prout jam pridem 
 eos damnavit et mine etiam damnat ecclesia. Imagines porro 
 Christi, deiparse virginis et aliorum sanctorum in templis prse- 
 sertim habendas et retinendas eisque debitum honorem et 
 venerationem impertiendam, non quod credatur inesse aliqua 
 in iis divinitas vel virtus, propter quam sint colendse, vel quod 
 ab eis sit aliquid petendum, vel quod fiducia in irnaginibus sit 
 figenda, veluti olim fiebat a gentibus, quse in idolis spem suam 
 collocabant : sed quoniam honos, qui eis exhibetur, refertur ad 
 prototypa, quse illse reprsesentant : ita ut per imagines, quas 
 osculamur et coram quibus caput aperimus et procumbimus, 
 Christum adoremus et sanctos, quorum illae similitudinem 
 gerunt, veneremur. Id quod conciliorum, praesertim vero 
 secundse Nicaenae synodi decretis contra imaginum oppugna- 
 tores est sancitum. 
 
 Cat. Rom. iii. 2. 23 : Cum Christus ejusque sanctissima et 
 purissima mater ceterique omnes sancti humana prsediti natura 4 
 humanam speciem gesserint, eorum imagines pingi atque hono- 
 rari non modo interdictum non fuit, sed etiam sanctum, et 
 grati animi certissimum argumentum semper habitum est. 
 24 : Non solum in ecclesi& imagines habere et illis honorem 
 et cultum adhibere ostendet parochus, cum honos, qui illis 
 exhibetur, referatur ad prototypa, verum etiam maximo fidelium 
 bono factum declarabit cet.
 
 76 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 II. iii. 2. 8 : Docendum est (venerationem sanctorum angel- 
 orum ac beatarum animarum, quae coelesti gloria perfruuntur) 
 aut etiam corporiun ipsorum sanctorumque cinerum cultum, 
 quem semper cath. ecclesia adhibuit, huic legi (de colendo uno 
 deo) non repugnare. ... ill 2. 1 5 : Cui fidem non faciant et 
 honoris, qui sanctis debetur, et patrocinii, quod nostri causa 
 suscipiunt, mirabiles effectse res ad eorum sepulcra, et oculis 
 et manibus membrisque omnibus captis in pristinum statum 
 restitutis, mortuis ad vitam revocatis, ex corporibus hominum 
 ejectis dsemoniis ? . . . Quid plura ? si vestes, sudaria, si umbra 
 sanctorum, priusquam e vita migrarent, depulit morbos viresque 
 restituit, quis tandem negare audeat, deum per sacros cineres, 
 ossa ceterasque sanctorum reliquias eadem mirabiliter effi- 
 cere ? 
 
 Cf. Eck, loci, c. 1 5 ; Bossuet, expos, c. 5 ; Bellarmin. dc eccles. 
 triumph, lib. ii. ; Klee, Dogmat. iii. 407 ff. 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. ortJiod. p. 328 : 'JET/iefc orav 
 Ta? 7rpo(TKVvovfjiv, Sev 7rpoo-Kvvovfj.ev ra ^putfiara rj TO. % v\a' pa 
 TOW dyiovs e/ee/ot>9, rwv oirolwv elvai, al et/coz/e?, So%d%o(j,ev fie 
 Trpo<TKvvT]<nv SouXet'a?, /SaXX&Ji/ra? pe TOV vow /aa? rrjv Ifcetvcav 
 irapovaiav et9 ra 6/i/iarta /ta?. 
 
 MetropJi. Critopul. Conf. p. 125 : Tat9 ar/tais elKoa-i Kal 
 Ti/j,r)V TTJV irpoarjKOVffav d7reveifj,ev, ov \aTpevriKrjv rj Sov\i/cr]v, 
 airaye' avrai <yap 6ea> JJLOVW irpocrrjKova'LV a\Xa a%eTiKT]V Kal 
 <f>i\iKijv dva<f>epov<ra p,iv roi Kal Tavryv eirl ra eKeivcav rrpo)- 
 rorvTra" w? <f)r)<riv 6 ev 07/045 Bacr/Xeto? o ^709. 'H rifj.7) 
 7^9 et/coi/09 e?rt TO TrpWTorvjrov SiaySaa/et. 
 
 Ibid. p. 128 : TTJV avrrjv Sia Ti/Arjv aTrovefjLet 77 KK\i)o-ia Kal 
 T0t9 071019 \effydvots, et [AOVOV a^TjOrj Kal avodevra ett], TroXXat 
 yap Travovpytat, Kal Ka7rij\iai eTrevoijdrjo'av irepl ravra. a>9 a~vfM- 
 (Satveiv rov avrov ayiov, ov ra \etyava ovofid^ovcri, rpiKe<^a\ov 
 Kal rrpaKe<pa\ov elvai, roffavro^eipd re Kal TOrauT07roSa. 
 'TroX.Xa^oO yap SeiKvvovcri ra avra fj,e\rj rov avrov dylov. oirep 
 <t>9 droTrov Kal KaTrrjXevriKov 7; ev/cXr/o-ia /itcret Kal dirorpe- 
 irerai. 
 
 Cf. Synod. Hierosol. in Harduin, Condi. XL p. 257 sqq. ;
 
 CULTUS OF THE VIRGIN, ETC. 77 
 
 Jerem. in Act. Wirtenib. p. 369; Plato, Catech. S. 164 f.; 
 Heinecc. Ablild. ii. 82 ff. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 In respect to the pictures of the saints, the Eastern Church differs 
 from the Western in this, that it tolerates no sculptured or hewn 
 images, only painted ones. Metroph. Critop. cap. xv. p. 125 : rourwy 
 \_ruv ftyiuv] tixova; fj lxxX>]ff/a Jro.s ou yXu-rraj ovde Xa^eyrdj a>.Xa 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 ApoL C. A. p. 229 : Ab invocatione (sanctorum) ad ima- 
 gines ventum est, hse quoque colebantur et putabatur eis 
 inesse qusedam vis, sicut magi vim inesse fingunt imaginibus 
 signorum ccelestium certo tempore sculptis. . . . 
 
 Art. Sm. p. 310 : Reliquiae sanctorum refertte multis men- 
 daciis, ineptiis et fatuitatibus. Canum et equorum ossa ibi 
 ssepe reperta sunt. Et licet aliquid forte laudandum fuisset, 
 tamen propter imposturas istas, quse diabolo risum excitarunt, 
 jam dudum damnari debuissent, cum prsesertim careant verbo 
 dei et non necessarian et inutiles sint. Estque hoc omnium 
 teterrimum, quod . . . loco cultus dei et boni operis, sicut 
 missam reliquias venerati sunt. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 4 : Quando beati spiritus ac divi coelites, 
 dum hie viverent, omnem cultum sui averterunt et statuas 
 oppugnarunt, cui verisimile videatur divis ccelitibus et angelis 
 suas placere imagines, ad quas genua flectunt homines, dete- 
 gunt capita, aliisque prosequuntur honoribus ? 
 
 Ibid. c. 5 : Multo minus credimus reliquias divorum ador- 
 andas esse aut colendas. Veteres isti sancti satis honorasse 
 videbantur mortuos suos, si honeste mandassent terrae reHquias, 
 postquam astra petiisset spiritus: ac omnium nobilissimas 
 reliquias majorum sestimabant esse virtutes, doctrinam et 
 fidem, quas ut commendabant cum laude mortuorum, ita eas 
 exprimere annitebantur, dum vivebant in terris. 
 
 Cf. against veneration of pictures generally, Cat. JRac. qu. 
 252; and against the Romish cultus of pictures and relics, 
 Curcellaai Institt. vii. 9. 14.
 
 IV. 
 ORIGINAL STATE OF MAN: THE IMAGE OF GOD. 
 
 POINT OF PIVEEGENCE. 
 
 IT is admitted on all sides that primitive mankind, or the first 
 pair, before the Fall and in a state of innocence, were both in 
 body and soul more perfect than all men have been since the 
 Fall. 1 Only in the definition of the compass of this primitive 
 perfection, and its relation to human nature, the Christian stan- 
 dards differ; although these differences are rather indicated than 
 expanded in the symbols. Some attribute to the original man 
 only unimpaired faculties of knowledge and will, sinlessness but 
 not virtue, as also freedom from bodily death. Among these are 
 Socinians and Arminians. Others ascribe to him an habitual 
 wisdom and holiness, with immortality of the body : these are 
 the Eomanists, Greeks, and Protestants. The latter section 
 are divided : the Protestants regard these advantages as natural 
 and increated in man ; the Eomanists regard them divine 
 gifts of grace, which were superadded to the natural en- 
 dowments of men, reason and free-will. The Socinians once 
 more unite with the Arminians in regarding immunity from 
 bodily death as something imputed by God to our first parents 
 as their destiny, consequently not as resulting from the nature 
 of man. 
 
 1 The Protoplasts had, that is, those qualities, not for themselves alone, but 
 as heads and representatives of the race ; consequently that they might trans- 
 mit them by generation to all men, which would indeed have been the case if the 
 Fall had not intervened. Comp. among others, the Conf. Gall. 10. 
 
 78
 
 ORIGINAL STATE OF MAN. 79 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. BOMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 5 : Si quis non confitetur, primum 
 hominem . . . sanctitatem et justitiam, in qua constitutus 
 fuerat, 1 amisisse incurrisseque . . . mortem, quam antea illi 
 comminatus fuerat deus, . . . anath. sit. 
 
 Cat. Rom. i. 2. 19 : Postremo deus ex limo terrae hominem 
 sic corpore effectum et constitutum effinxit, ut non quidem 
 naturae ipsius vi, sed divino beneficio immortalis esset et impas- 
 sibilis. Quod autem ad animan pertinet, eum ad imaginem 
 et similitudinem suam formavit liberumque ei arbitrium tri- 
 buit, omnes pneterea motus animi atque appetitiones ita in eo 
 temperavit, ut rationis imperio nunquam non parerent. Turn 
 originalis justitise admirabile donum addidit, ac deinde caeteris 
 animantibus praeesse voluit. 
 
 (Bellarmini Gratia primi horn. 2 : Integritas ilia, cum qua 
 primus homo conditus fuit et sine qua post ejus lapsum 
 homines omnes nascuntur, non fuit naturalis ejus conditio, sed 
 supernaturalis evectio. 11. 5 : Sciendum est primo, hominem 
 naturaliter constare ex carne et spiritu, et ideo partirn cum 
 bestiis partim cum angelis communicare naturam ; et quidem 
 ratione carnis et communionis cum bestiis habere propensionem 
 quandam ad bonum corporale et sensibile, in quod fertur per 
 sensum et appetitum ; ratione spiritus et communionis cum 
 angelis habere propensionem ad bonum spirituale et intelli- 
 gibile, in quod fertur per intelligentiam et voluntatem. Ex 
 his autem diversis vel contrariis propensionibus existere in 
 uno eodemque homine pugnam quandam, et ex ea pugna 
 ingentem bene agendi difncultatem, dum una propensio alteram 
 impedit. Sciendum secundo, divinam providentiam initio 
 creationis, ut remedium adhiberet huic morbo seu languori 
 naturae humanae, qui ex conditione materiae oriebatur, addidisse 
 
 1 As to the choice of this word, see Nitzsch in the Stud. 1834, S. 31. Even 
 rigorous theologians of the Eoman Church say positively : Primes homines 
 creates esse cum or in justitia orig. (Bellarmini Grot. horn, primi, c. 5). The 
 distinguishing point lies rather in the supernaturale ; for, as Bellarmine says, 
 " gratiam gratum facientem (justit. orig.) in creatione accepit homo."
 
 80 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 homini domim quoddam insigne, justitiam videlicet originalem, 
 qua veluti aureo quodam frseno pars inferior parti superiori et 
 pars superior deo facile subjecta contineretur ; sic autem sub- 
 jectam fuisse carnem spiritui, ut non posset ipso invito moveri, 
 neque ei rebellis fieri, nisi ipse fieret rebellis deo, in potestate 
 tamen spiritus fuisse, rebellem deo fieri, et non fieri. Nos 
 existimamus, rectitudinem illam etiam partis inferioris fuisse 
 donum supernaturale, et quidem per se, non per accidens, ita 
 ut neque ex nature principiis fluxerit, neque potuerit fluere. 
 Et quia donum illud supernaturale erat, ut statim probaturi 
 sumus, eo remoto, natura humana sibi relicta pugnam illam 
 experiri ccepit partis inferioris cum superiore, quse naturalis 
 futura erat, id est ex conditione materise secutura, nisi deus 
 justitiae donum homini addidisset.) 
 
 Cf. Mbhler, Symbol. 1, and Neue Untcrsuch. S. 60 ff. ; 
 Klee, kathol. Dogmat. ii. 318 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 50 : 'H KaTaaTacns Tr)<; dtcatcia<; KOI ddwo- 
 eivai 17 djvoia Kal rj airetpuz, TOV KO.KOV, rfyovv orav Bev 
 ify) ovre eSoKifiatre ica66\ov TO KCLKOV, rj Bid TTJV rj\tKiav rov 
 T} Si aXXat? airiais. Kal Kara rovrov TOV rpcnrov rfrov et? rbv 
 TI adcooTT)? Kal f) atca/cia, irplv afjMprrj, Kara Tracrav 
 /cat SiKaioa-vvrjv e^vrov, Toaov O.TTO TO ftepo*; T?}? 
 oaov Kal OLTTO TO /te/ao? T^9 ^eX^o-ew?, et? rrjv Bidvoiav 
 TrepiK\eirai TraVa eVio-T^'/i?;' ical ei? TT)I/ Oe\i)<riv xaaa 
 ^/wycTTOT?;? Kal /ca\oavvr). Aun\ yvwpi&vras 6 'ABajj, TOV 
 6ebv Ka\d)Tara (icaff ocrov et? TOV Kaipbv eKetvov TOV TJTOV <rvy- 
 KexapyfAevov, Kal KCL& o&ov eTrpeTre) /te TOVTO OTroy eyvatpi^e 
 TOV OeoVj eyvtopi&v oXa TO, TrpdyjuiTa /U.CT' Keivov. . . . P. 5 1 : 
 He/31 Be T7/9 ^e\7;o-eo)9, avTij TrdvroTe vTroTaa-a-ero 19 TOV \6yov. 
 Ka\a xal TrdvTOTe va TJTOV eXevdepa, Kal TJTOV e^ovcia et9 Toy 
 avdptOTTOV va apApTr) f) vd fj.rjv d/jUtpTrj. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. indicates a distinction between natural and 
 supernatural elements in the first man. Conf. c. 3, p. 51 : 
 The Protoplasts, having lost all their divine and spiritual gifts, 
 remained devoid of these, only the natural light being left. 
 Cf. cap. 8, p. 88, and Dositheus, c. 14.
 
 ORIGINAL STATE OF MAN. 8 1 
 
 III. LUTHERAN. 
 
 Apol. C. A. p. 53 sq. : Justitia originalis habitura erat non 
 solum sequale temperamentum qualitatum corporis, sed etiam 
 haec dona, notitiam dei certiorem, timorem dei, fiduciam dei, 
 aut certe rectitudinem et vim ista efficiendi. 1 Idque testatur 
 scriptura, cum inquit, hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem 
 dei conditum esse (Gen. i. 27). Quod quid est aliud, nisi in 
 homine hanc sapientiam et justitiam effigiatam esse, quse deum 
 apprehenderet et in qua reluceret deus, hoc est, homini dona 
 esse data notitiam dei, timorem dei, fiduciam erga deum et 
 similia ? (Cf. p. 52 : Propriis viribus posse diligeredeum super 
 omnia, facere praecepta dei, quid aliud est quam habere justitiam 
 originis ?) 
 
 (Conf. Sax. ii. p. 53, more precise as to the inborn character : 
 Justitia originalis non tantum fuit acceptatio generis hum. 
 coram deo, sed etiam in ipsa natura hominum lux in mente, 
 quia firmiter assentiri verbo dei poterat, et conversio voluntatis 
 ad deum et obedientia cordis congruens cum judicio legis dei, 
 quae menti insita erat.) 
 
 F. C. p. 640: (Peccatum orig.) est privatio concreatae in 
 paradise justitiae originalis s. imaginis dei, ad quam homo initio 
 in veritate, sanctitate atque Justitia creatus fuerat. 
 
 IV. BEFORMED. 
 
 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. 8 : Fuit homo ab initio a deo conditus ad 
 imaginem dei, in Justitia et sanctitate veritatis, bonus et rectus. 
 Sed instinctu serpentis et sua culpa a bonitate et rectitudine de- 
 ficiens, peccato, morti variisque calamitatibus factus est obnoxius. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 14 : Credimus, deum ex terrse pulvere 
 hominem creasse et ad suam imaginem et similitudinem fecisse 
 atque efformasse, bonum nempe, justum et sanctum, qui suo 
 sese arbitrio ad divinam voluntatem per omnia componere posset. 
 
 1 That Melanchthon meant, not a mere capacity or ability, but a power which 
 confers that to which it is directed, an active habitus, is clear from his definitions 
 elsewhere. The bias of the first man to goodness, well-pleasing to God, was so 
 strong and decisive, that he in fact did only what was good. Cf. Apol. p. 51. 
 This was the perfection of human nature, as it proceeded from the hands of the 
 Creator : lutzsch in Stud. 1834, 37. On rectitudo, see Nitzsch, id. 
 
 F
 
 82 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Conf. Scot. art. 2 : Confitemur, deum creasse hominem, vide- 
 licet . . . Adamum, in imaginem et similitudinem suam, cui 
 eapientiam, dominium, justitiam, libemm arbitrium et claram 
 sui ipsius notitiam dedit, adeo ut in tota hominis natur& nulla 
 potuerit notari imperfectio. 
 
 Canon. Dordrac. iii. 1 : Homo ab initio ad imaginem dei 
 conditus vera et salutari sui creatoris et rerum spiritualium 
 notitia in mente, et justitisl in voluntate et corde, puritate in 
 omnibus affectibus, exornatus adeoque totus sanctus fuit. 
 
 Cf. Cat. Heidelb. 6 ; Form. Cons. Helv. 7. {West. Conf. ch. 
 iv. sect. 2.] 
 
 V. MENNONITES. 
 
 The Mennonites also, at least in the Conf. which is now to 
 be quoted, appear to distinguish between natural and non- 
 natural endowments in the first man, terming the latter imago 
 Dei. The Conf. of Ris does not go beyond general expressions. 
 
 Conf. Fris. et Germ. : Hominem fecit deus, quern prorsus 
 condecoravit sapientia", ingenio et intellectu super creaturas 
 omnes eumque dominum omnium illarum constituit et pras- 
 terea seoundum imaginem suam divinam in justiti& et 
 sanctimoniEt verei ad immortalitatem creatum in paradiso 
 posuit cet. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 1. The distinction between the natural and the supernatural in the 
 original man is not expressed with as much clearness by the symbols 
 as it is by the theologians, especially Bellannine, in the passages 
 quoted. The Cat. Horn., however, leaves not much difficulty about 
 the question. On the other hand, the Protestant symbols do not 
 expressly declare that the justitia originalis was an integral and neces- 
 sary element of man's primitive nature itself. Luther is very clear, on 
 Gen. iii., that righteousness was not a certain gift which came from 
 without, separate from the nature of man, but was natural, so that it 
 was the nature of Adam to love God. Cf. Melanc. Loc. i. 85. Thus 
 we are to interpret the concreata of Form. Cone. p. 640 ; and in the 
 clause p. 645 : originale peccatum, quod in hominis naturd et essentid 
 habitat. Now, as the peccatum originis, total corruption, came into 
 the place of the original righteousness (see below, v.) ; since, once 
 more, the liberum arbitrium in spiritual things is denied to fallen human 
 nature, that is, the right direction of the natural will, it follows that
 
 OEIGINAL STATE OF MAN. 83 
 
 the justitia originalis must be thought of as natural to man. Immor- 
 tality, a posse non mori, the Protestant symbols do not reckon an 
 element in the image of God ; but this follows per consequent from 
 what had been said about the punishment of Adam (Conf. Aug. 2 ; 
 Conf. Helv. ii. 2 ; and Conf. Belg. 14), and that cequale temperamentum 
 qualitatis corporis could hardly have any other result than immunity 
 from physical death (Baier, Theol. Pos. p. 258). 
 
 VI. AKMINTAN. 
 
 Conf. Eemonstr. v. 5 :. (Primos homines) intellectu etiam puro 
 animoque recto et libera" voluntate aliisque affectibus integris 
 ornavit deus, quin et necessaria" in isto statu sapientia", integri- 
 tate gratiaque varia" sufficienter instruxit, non solum ut glorioso 
 in caeteras creaturas imperio ac dominio recte uti scirent, sed 
 ut dei etiam . . . erga se voluntatem imprimis recte intelli- 
 gerent suamque propriam voluntatem deo . . . ultro subji- 
 cerent cet. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Bern. p. 60 b: Qualemcunque justitiam ori- 
 ginalem Adamo et Evae attribueris . . . earn volentibus ac 
 lubentibus Eemonstrantibus Adamo et Evse attribueris, duin- 
 modo justitiam orig. ejusmodi qualitatem aut formam esse 
 non dicas, qua positS, impossibile fuerit peccare Adamum et 
 qua non posita' impossibile fuerit Adamum non peccare. P. 
 42 a : Falsum est, corpus Adami immortale h.e. incorrupti- 
 bile fuisse ; corpus omne animale . . . corruptibile esse, ratio 
 recta docet. 
 
 Lirnborch, Theol. christ. ii. 24. 5 : Justitiam originalem 
 solent collocare in mentis lumine ac rectitudine, in voluntatis 
 sanctitate et justitia', in sensuum et affectuum harmoni^ atque 
 ad bonum promptitudine. Sane homines primos in primsevo suo 
 statu longe perfections fuisse conditionis, quam nos, cum in 
 lucem edimur, evidentissimum est. Non enim mens ipsorum 
 f uit tabulae instar rasse, omnique cognitione destitutae, sed ipsi 
 scientiS, actuali fuere prasditi et necessariS, sapientia" in statu t 
 illo a deo instructi ; aderat et capacitas ad scientiam ulteriorem 
 acquirendum per ratiocinationem, experientiam et revelationem. 
 Non tamen erant omniscii, aderat et ignorantia quorundam, 
 nesciebant se nudos esse, vel potius, nuditatem esse indecoram ; 
 ignorasse videntur, serpentem animal esse mutum, alias frau-
 
 84 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 dem metuissent, aliaque similia. Quin et tanta non erat 
 sapientia, quin in errorem seduci possent, quod in Eva patuit. 
 Voluntas eorum non fuit neutra, in bonum ac malum aeque 
 indifferens, sed antequam ei lex a deo posita erat, rectitudinern 
 habuit naturalem, ut inordinate nee concupisceret nee posset. 
 Ubi enim lex non est, ibi liberrimus voluntatis usus absque 
 culpa. ii 24. 10 : Primum hominem, nisi peccasset, non 
 fuisse moriturum, dubitandum non est, mors enim poena peccati 
 fuit. Inde vero non recte hominis immortalitas infertur. . . . 
 Attamen mortalitatem istam, nisi homo peccasset, in perpetuum 
 a moriendi actu immunem conservasset deus. 
 
 VII. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. Eacov. p. 1 8 : Ab initio homo mortalis creatus fuit i. e. 
 talis, qui non solum natural sua mori potuerit sed etiam, si 
 naturae suae relinqueretur, non potuerit non mori, licet divino 
 beneficio semper in vita conservari posset. Cf. Socin. Prcelect. c. 
 1, with the Eesponsio ad defens ; F. Puccii in Opp. ii. 272 sqq. 
 
 Socin. Prcelect. c. 3 : Si justitiae originalis nomine earn con- 
 ditionem intelligunt, ut non posset (primus homo) peccare, earn 
 certe non habuit Adamus, cum eum peccasse constet. Neque 
 enim peccasset, nisi prius peccare potuisset. . . . Concludamus 
 igitur, Adamum etiam antequam mandatum illud dei trans- 
 grederetur, revera justum non fuisse, cum nee impeccabilis esset 
 nee ullam peccandi occasionem habuisset ; vel certe justum 
 eum fuisse amrmari non posse, cum nullo modo constet, eum 
 ulla ratione a peccato abstinuisse. Sed sunt, qui dicant, ori- 
 ginalem primi horn, justitiam in eo fuisse, quod rationem ap- 
 petitui ac gensibus dominantem haberet eosque regentem, nee 
 ullum inter ipsam et illos dissidium esset. Verum nulla ratione 
 adducti hoc dicunt, cum potius ex eo, quod Adam deliquit, ap- 
 pareat appetitum ac sensus rationi dominatos fuisse nee bene 
 inter hanc et illos antea convenisse. 
 
 Cat. Racov. q. 22 (final Eevis.) : Certum est, primum 
 hominem ita a deo condition fuisse, ut libero arbitrio praeditus 
 esset, nee vero ulla causa subest, cur deus post ejus lapsum 
 ilium eo privarit, ac neque sequitas ac justitia seu rectitude 
 dei pennittit, ut hominem recta agendi voluntate ac facultate
 
 ORIGINAL STATE OF MAN. 85 
 
 privet, prtesertim cum post illud tempus nihilominus ut recta 
 velit atque agat, ab eo sub comxninatione pcense exigat ; nee 
 etiam inter pcenas, quibus Adse peccatum punivit deus, ejus- 
 modi pcensB mentio exstat. 
 
 VIII. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers do not commit themselves to a definition of 
 justitia originalis. Barclay, Apol. prop. ii. 4 : Not to dive into 
 the many curious notions which many have concerning the 
 condition of Adam before the Fall, all agree in this, that 
 thereby he came to a very great loss, not only in the things 
 which relate to the outward man, but in regard to that true 
 fellowship and communion he had with God. We shall not 
 attempt to fill up the blank in the doctrine of the Quakers by 
 inferences drawn from their teaching as to the state of man 
 after the Fall. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 2. The original perfections of the first man are classed together in 
 the Protestant symbols as the Imago Dei: Apol. C. A. p. 54 ; Conf. 
 Helv. xi. c. 8 ; Gall 9 ; Belg. 14 ; Scot. 2 ; Canon Dordr. iii. 1. 
 The Cat. Rom. refers this expression only to the freedom of the will. 1 
 The Arrninians (Conf. Rem. v. 4 ; Apol. 60 ; Curcellsei Instit. iii. 8) 
 and the Socinians (Cat. Racov. qu. 42, F. Socin. passim) apply it 
 (following Gen. i. 26, Ps. viii. 7) to the dominion over the creatures. 
 The Mennonites seem to include in it the holiness imparted to man, 
 and his destination to immortal life (Schyn, Plen. Ded. p. 89). With the 
 Greeks this expression has never gained any symbolical significance ; 
 it does not occur in the Conf. orthod. Metroph. Critop. gives a very 
 strange explanation of the image of God ; and in a form of prayer 
 (Goar, Eucholog. p. 684) that image is, it would seem, referred to the 
 external beauty of the body. The patriarch Jeremias, however 
 (Act. Wirt. 366), distinguishes between s/xuv and opoiuffis Qtov] he 
 regards the former as something belonging to man naturally, the 
 latter as the result of his moral endeavours. On the contrary, the 
 Conf. orthod. declares that man in his state of innocence was Spotc; 
 TMC, ayysXo/s, like the angels (p. 52). As an idea disputed in theology, 
 the image of God is treated by Karpinski, Comp. theol. p. 59 seq. 
 
 1 The distinction between the Imago Dei and the similitudo cum Deo may be 
 passed over, having no relation to Symbolism.
 
 V. 
 
 EESULTS OF THE FALL : PEESENT 
 STATE OF MAN. 
 
 I FIKST POINT OF DIVEKGENCE. 
 
 IT is agreed upon by all, that in the sin of Adam (Gen. iii. ; 
 cf. Horn. v. 1 2 seq.), gui non sibi tantum, sed et nobis nocuit, 
 who hurt not himself only, but also us, the ultimate reason is 
 to be found why all men naturally descended from him, (since 
 the Fall) are born without those prerogatives and advantages 
 which the first human pair had before the Fall. But in the 
 definition of the manner how, and of the degree in which, the 
 sin of Adam wrought ruinously upon all men, the communions 
 of Christendom differ. For the Eoman and Greek Churches, 
 in harmony with the positions laid down by them on the pre- 
 ceding subject (iv.), regard as the true and proper result of the 
 first sin, as the divine punishment of Adam's transgression, 
 only the loss of those gifts of the divine favour in the pos- 
 session of which the first man stood, that is to say, of original 
 holiness and immortality : both Churches, however, connecting 
 strictly with this a certain enfeebling of the natural powers 
 for good in consequence of this loss. 1 Protestants, on the 
 other hand, deem that with the loss of justitia originalis there 
 entered an entire depravation of human nature in spiritual 
 
 1 The theologians call this vulnera naturae, which must be regarded as the 
 results, not the constituents, of the original sin : Bellarm. Amiss. Graf. v. 4. 
 6. 9. He also says (Grat. prim. horn. c. 2) : homo nunc nascitur pronus ad 
 malum, infinnus, ignorans. But that this weakness does not belong to the 
 corruptio naturae, Bellarmine expressly declares, De grat. prim. horn. c. 5. 
 
 86
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 87 
 
 respects, so that the natural man is turned away from God, 
 and inclined only to evil (prava concupiscentia) ; and this they 
 regard as the immediate and proper consequence of the sin of 
 Adam. Man after the Fall has, according to the Eoman 
 Catholic doctrine, the very same nature, that is, as to all its 
 faculties, which Adam had, but now without those dona super- 
 naturalia ; he has the pura naturalia, yet as to their strength 
 greatly weakened. According to the Protestant standards, the 
 nature of man is deprived of essential and increated advan- 
 tages and powers : therefore robbed of its integrity. 1 The Soci- 
 nians reckon as the consequence of Adam's sin, as resting upon 
 all men, only the resulting necessity of dying ; although they 
 do not deny that, as the effect of the entrance of sin through 
 that first sin into mankind, a moral weakness has by degrees 
 entered, with which every one is now born. The Quakers speak 
 more decisively of a semen peccati, which has penetrated from 
 Adam to mankind : the capacity for the divine grace, for the 
 internal light, being however left to man. But withal, the 
 Quakers do not carry back their doctrine to the original per- 
 fections of the first man. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. EOMAN. 
 
 The Eoman Catholic doctrine is not expanded either in the 
 Cone. Trid. or in the Cat. Rom. : the latter appeals simply to 
 the former (i. 3. 2). But from the definition of the original 
 state of man (see the previous article), compared with the 
 decrees concerning sin, what we have said above follows of 
 itself. Bellarmine with great precision states the doctrine 
 (De Grot. iv. 15, vi. 10). 
 
 Concil. Trid. sess. v. 1 : Si quis non confitetur, primum 
 hominem Adam, cum mandatum dei in paradiso fuisset trans- 
 
 1 To the Romanists original sin is something negative ; to the Protestants 
 inherited sin is something positive (Mbhler). When Melanchthon accepts the 
 Komish definition of inherited sin as carentia justitice originalis (inesse debilce), 
 Apol. p. 53 (cf. Sax. Conf. p. 53), he does so under the supposition of the Pro- 
 testant idea of justitia origlnalis being essentially concreata (naturalis).
 
 88 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 gressus, statim sanctitatem et justitiam . . . amisisse incur- 
 risseque per offensam praevaricationis hujusmodi iram et 
 indignationem del atque ideo mortem . . . totumq. Adam per 
 illam praevaricationis offensam secundum corpus et animam in 
 detenus commutatum fuisse, anath. sit. 2 : Si quis Adae prae- 
 varicationem sibi soli et non ejus propagini asserit nocuisse et 
 acceptam a deo sanctitatem et justitiam, quam perdidit, sibi 
 soli et non nobis etiam eum perdidisse, aut inquinatum ilium 
 per inobedientiae peccatum mortem et posnas corporis tantum 
 in omne genus hum. transfudisse, non autem et peccatum, quod 
 mors est animae, anath. sit. 
 
 /&. sess. 6, cap. 1 : Declarat synodus oportere, ut unus- 
 quisque agnoscat et fateatur, quod cum omnes homines in prae- 
 varicatione Adae innocentiam perdidissent, facti immundi . . . 
 usque adeo send erant peccati, . . . tametsi in eis liberum 
 arbitrium minime exstinctum esset, viribus licet attenuatum et 
 inclinatum. Can. 5 : Si quis liberum hominis arbitrium post 
 Adae peccatum amissum et exstinctum esse dixerit cet. ana- 
 thema sit. 
 
 (Bellarmin. Amiss, grot. iii. 1 : Pcena, quae proprie primo 
 peccato quasi e regione respondet, jactura fuit originalis jus- 
 titias et supernaturalium donorum, quibus deus naturam nos- 
 tram instruxerat De gratia primi horn. 1 : Decent, per Adae 
 peccatum totum hominem vere deteriorem esse factum et tamen 
 nee liberum arbitrium neque alia naturalia dona, sed solum 
 supernaturalia perdidisse. Hid. c. 5 : Quare non magis differt 
 status hominis post lapsum Adas a statu ejusdem in puris 
 naturalibus, quam differat spoliatus a nudo, neque deterior est 
 humana natura (si culpam originalem detrahas), neque magis 
 ignorantia et infirmitate laborat, quam esset et laboraret in 
 puris naturalibus condita. Proinde corruptio naturae non ex 
 alicujus doni carentia, neque ex alicujus malae qualitatis accessu, 
 sed ex sola doni supernaturalis ob Adae peccatum amissione 
 profluxit.) 
 
 Cat. Rom. iii 10. 6 : Kecta quidem concupiscendi vis deo 
 auctore a natura nobis insita est, sed primorum parentum nos- 
 trorum peccato factum est, ut ilia naturae fines transsiliens 
 usque adeo depravata sit, ut ad ea concupiscenda saepe exci- 
 tetur, quae spiritui ac rationi repugnant.
 
 EESULTS OF THE FALL. 89 
 
 (Bellarmini Amiss, grat. v. 5 : Non est qusestio inter nos 
 et adversaries, sitne humana natura graviter depravata per Adse 
 peccatum. Id enim libentur fatemur. Neque etiam qusestio 
 est, an hsec depravatio aliquo modo ad peccatum originate per- 
 tineat, ita ut materiale ejus peccati dici possit. Id enim S. 
 Thomas concedit cet. Sed tota controversia est, utrum cor- 
 ruptio naturse ac prsesertim concupiscentia per se et ex natural 
 SU&, qualis invenitur etiam in baptizatis et justificatis, sit 
 proprie peccatum originale. Id catholici negant cet.) 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. ortli. p. 52 : '/2? av eo-(j)a\e fie rrjv irapdftaviv, Trapev- 
 6vs et? TOV 't$iov TOTTOV TOV TrapaSeiaov, Trepvavras rrjv Kard- 
 trraa'LV T?}? dfiapTias eytvrjKe OVIJTOS. Kal Tore irapevdv^ e^acre 
 Tr)V Te\i6rr)ra TOV \6yov KOI TT}? ^i/cocretu?* fcal rj deXrjais 
 K\t,ve Trepio~o~OTepov et? TO KOKOV, "irapa et? TO icdkov KOI OUTW? 
 7} /caTac7Ta<7i9 TT}? a^cooT^TO? KOI aicaic'ias, eaTcovTas Kal va, 
 OKip,dari TO Kdfcav, aXXafey et? KaTacrTa<riv aftapTias. P. 58 : 
 'O ^070?, OTav 6 av0pa>TTO<; TJTOV et? TTJV KaTaaTaatv T}? aOwo- 
 TT}TO<j, r)<yovv irpiv dfJ,dpTrj, r}TOV dBid<j)0opo<; et? Trjv TeXetoT^Ta 
 TOV, /cat Sia Tr]V apapTiav e^ddpr}' fta rj ^eX^at?, /caXa Kal va 
 jj,6ii>ev a/SXa/S?;, et? TO va eiriOvpa TO KO\OV -rj TO KaKov, e<ywev 
 fju o\ov TOVTO et? /caTTOtou?, "TrXeov einppe.7rrj^ Kal K\ivet TT/ao? TO 
 
 ov Kal et? aXXov? TT^O? TO /caXoi/. P. 59 : Aefyvei, o a 
 
 (Basilius), TTW? Ka\a Kal f) avOpwTrivrj 
 fie TO irpoTraTOpiKov dfidpTfjfia, p 6\ov TOVTO Kal Tw 
 TOV irapovTa Katpbv et? Trjv irpoaipeo-iv TOV 
 <TTKTai, TO va elvat AcaXo? Kal TCKVOV 0eov, ^ /ca/co? Kal uio? 
 ta/3oXov. Comp., on the freedom of the will in the natural man, 
 Jerem. in Art. Wirtemb. p. 367 ; Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. 4, 
 p. 66 ; Dosithei Confess, cc. iii. and xiv. 
 
 III. LUTHERAN. 
 
 C. A. p. 9 : Docent, quod post lapsum Adse omnes homines, 
 secundum naturam propagati, nascantur cum peccato h. e. 
 sine metu dei, sine fiducia erga deum et cum concupiscentia. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 51 : Hie locus testatur, nos non solum
 
 90 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 actus, sed potentiam sen dona efficiendi, timorem et fiduciain 
 erga deum, adimere propagatis secundum carnalem naturam. 
 Dicimus enim, ita natos habere concupiscentiam nee posse 
 efficere verum timorem et fiduciam erga deum. 
 
 I~b. p. 53 : . . . Voluimus significare, quod peccatum ori- 
 ginis hos quoque morbos contineat, ignorationem del, contem- 
 tum del, vacare metu del et fiducia erga deum, non posse 
 diligere deum. Haec sunt praecipua vitia naturae humanae, 
 pugnantia proprie cum prima tabula decalogt 
 
 H). p. 55: Nos recte expressimus utrumque in descriptione 
 peccati originalis, videlicet defectus illos, non posse deo 
 credere, non posse deum timere ac diligere, item habere con- 
 cupiscentiam, quae carnalia quserit contra verbum dei, hoc est, 
 quaerit non solum voluptates corporis, sed etiam sapientiam 
 et justitiam carnalem, et confidit his bonis contemnens deum. 
 
 Art. Sm. p. 317: Peccatum haereditarium tarn profunda et 
 tetra est corruptio naturae, ut nullius hominis ratione intelligi 
 possit, sed ex scriptures patefactione agnoscenda et credenda 
 sit. 
 
 F. C. p. 573: Credimus, quod sit aliquod discrimen inter 
 ipsam hominis naturam, non tantum quemadmodum initio a 
 deo purus et sanctus et absque peccato homo conditus est, 
 verum etiam qualem jam post lapsum naturam illam habemus. 
 
 Tb. p. 574: Credimus, peccatum originis non esse levem, 
 sed tarn profundam humanae naturae corruptionem, quae nihil 
 sanum, nihil incorruptum in corpore et anima hominis, atque 
 adeo in interioribus et exterioribus viribus ejus, reliquit. . . . 
 
 Tb. p. 640 : (Credimus est), quod sit per omnia totalis 
 carentia, defectus seu privatio concreatae in paradise justitiaj 
 originalis seu imaginis dei, ad quam homo initio in veritate, 
 sanctitate atque justitia creatus fuerat, et quod simul etiam sit 
 impotentia et inaptitude, aSuvapia et stupiditas, qua" homo ad 
 omnia divina seu spiritualia sit prorsus ineptus. Praeterea, 
 quod peccatum originale in humana natura non tantummodo 
 sit ejusmodi totalis carentia seu defectus omnium bonorum in 
 rebus spiritualibus ad deum pertinentibus, sed quod sit etiam 
 loco imaginis dei amissae in homine intima, pessima, profun- 
 dissima, (instar cujusdam abyssi) inscrutabilis et ineffabilis 
 corruptio totius naturae et omnium virium, imprimis vero
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 91 
 
 superiorum et principalium animse facultatum, in mente, in- 
 tellectu, corde et voluntate. Itaque jam post lapsum homo 
 haereditario a parentibus accipit congenitam pravam vim, in- 
 ternam immunditiem cordis, pravas concupiscentias et pravas 
 inclinationes : ita, ut omnes natura" talia corda, tales sensus et 
 cogitationes ab Adamo haereditaria" et naturali propagatione 
 consequamur, quae secundum summas suas vires et juxta 
 lumen rationis naturaliter e diametro cum deo et summis 
 ipsius mandatis pugnent atque inimiciti^ sint adversus deum, 
 praesertim quantum ad res divinas et spirituales attinet. In 
 aliis enim externis et hujus mundi rebus, quae rationi sub- 
 jectae sunt, relictum est homini adhuc aliquid intellectus, 
 virium et facultatum: etsi hae etiam miserae reliquiae valde 
 sunt debiles : et quidem haec ipsa quantulacunque per morbum 
 ilium haereditarium veneno infecta sunt atque contaminata, ut 
 coram deo nullius momenti sint. 
 
 Against Macius, who maintained that inherited sin, as a 
 totalis corruptio naturce humance, is and exists in the very sub- 
 stance of man himself, the Formula Gone, thus protests : Etsi 
 peccatum originale totam hominis naturam, ut spirituale 
 quoddam venenum et horribilis lepra (quemadmodum D. 
 Lutherus loquitur) infecit et corrupit, ita quidem, ut jam in 
 nostra natural corrupta" ad oculum non monstrari possint dis- 
 tincte Haec duo, ipsa natura sola et originale peccatum solum : 
 tamen non unum et idem est corrupta natura seu substantia 
 corrupti hominis, corpus et anima, aut homo ipse a deo creatus 
 in quo originale peccatum habitat, (cujus ratione natura, sub- 
 stantia, totus denique homo corruptus est) et ipsum originale 
 peccatum, quod in hominis natura aut essentia" habitat eamque 
 corrumpit; quemadmodum etiam in lepra corporali ipsum 
 corpus leprosum et lepra ipsa in corpore non sunt unum et 
 idem, si proprie et distincte ea .de re disserere velimus. Dis- 
 crimen igitur retinendum est inter naturam nostram, qualis a 
 deo creata est hodieque conservatur, in qua" peccatum originale 
 habitat, et inter ipsum peccatum originis, quod in natura 
 habitat. Haec enim duo secundum sacraa scripturae regulam 
 distincte considerari, doceri et credi debent et possunt
 
 92 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 IV. REFORMED. 
 
 Conf, Basil. 2 : Through Adam's fall the entire human race 
 is corrupted and subject to condemnation; our nature has 
 been weakened, and affected with such a bias to sin that, 
 unless the Spirit of God restores it, man of himself can do 
 nothing good. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 8 : Qualis (homo, Adam) factus est a 
 lapsu, tales sunt omnes, qui ex ipso prognati sunt, peccato 
 inquam, morti variisque obnoxii calamitatibus. Peccatum 
 autem intelligimus esse nativam illam hominis corruptionem 
 ex primis illis nostris parentibus in nos omnes derivatam vel 
 propagatam, qua concupiscentiis pravis immersi et a bono 
 aversi, ad omne vero malum propensi, pleni omni nequitia, 
 diffidentia, contemtu et odio dei, nihil boni ex nobis ipsis 
 facere, imo ne cogitare quidem possumus. 
 
 /&. cap. 9 : Considerandum est, qualis fuerit homo post 
 lapsum. Non sublatus est quidem homini intellectus, non 
 erepta ei voluntas, et prorsus in lapidem vel truncum est 
 commutatus. Ceterum ilia ita sunt immutata et imminuta in 
 homine, ut non possint amplius quod potuerunt ante lapsum. 
 Intellectus eniin obscuratus est, voluntas vero ex libera facta 
 est voluntas serva. Nam servit peccato, non nolens sed 
 volens. Etenim voluntas, non noluntas dicitur. Ergo quoad 
 malum sive peccatum homo non coactus vel a deo vel a 
 diabolo, sed sua sponte malum facit et hac parte liberrimi 
 est arbitrii. . . . Quantum vero ad bonum et ad virtutes, 
 intellectus hominis non recte judicat de divinis ex semet 
 ipso. 
 
 Confess. Gall. art. 9 : Credimus, hominem . . . su& ipsius culpa 
 excidisse a gratia", quam acceperat ac proinde seipsum a deo 
 omnis justitiae et bonatum omnium fonte abalienasse, adeo ut 
 ipsius natura sit prorsus corrupta et spiritus excoecatus ac 
 corde depravatus, omnem illam integritatem sine ulla prorsus 
 exceptione amiserit. Etsi enim nonnullam habet boni et mali 
 discretionem, affirmamus tamen, quid quid habet lucis, mox. 
 fieri tenebras, cum de quasrendo deo agitur, adeo ut sua intel- 
 ligentia et ratione nullo modo possit ad eum accedere. Item, 
 quamvis voluntate sit prceditus, qua ad hoc vel illud movetur,
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 93 
 
 tamen, cum ea sit penitus sub peccato captiva, nullam prorsus 
 habet ad bonum appetendum libertatem, nisi quam ex gratia 
 et dei dono acceperit. 
 
 Thirty-nine Articles, art. 9 : Original sin standeth not in the 
 following of Adam (as the Pelagians do vainly talk), but it is the 
 fault or corruption of the nature of every man that naturally 
 is engendered of the offspring of Adam, whereby man is very 
 far gone from original righteousness ab originali justitid 
 quam longissime distet and is of his own nature inclined to 
 evil, so that the flesh lusteth always contrary to the Spirit, 
 and therefore, in every person born into the world, it de- 
 serveth God's wrath and damnation; and this infection of 
 nature doth remain, yea, in them that are regenerated, whereby 
 the lust of the flesh, called in Greek ^povij^a crap/co?, which 
 some do expound the wisdom, some sensuality, some the 
 affection, some the desire of the flesh, is not subject to the 
 law of God ; and though there is no condemnation for them 
 that believe and are baptized, yet the apostle doth confess 
 that concupiscence and lust hath of itself the nature of 
 sin. 
 
 Conf. Scot. 3 : (Adami) transgressione, quse vulgo dicitur 
 originale peccatum, prorsus deformata est ilia dei in homine 
 imago ipseque et ejus posteri natur^ facti sunt inimici dei, 
 mancipia satanse et servi peccati, adeo ut mors aeterna 
 habuerit et habitura sit potentiam et dominium in omnes 
 etc. 
 
 [ Westm. Conf. vi. 23: By this sin they fell from their 
 original righteousness and communion with God, and so be- 
 came dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the faculties and 
 parts of soul and body. They being the root of all mankind, 
 the guilt of this sin was imputed, and the same death in sin 
 and corrupted nature conveyed to all their posterity, descend- 
 ing from them by ordinary generation. From this original 
 corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and 
 made opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to all evil, do 
 proceed all actual transgressions.] 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 15 : (Peccatum originis) est totius naturae 
 corruptio et vitium hsereditarium, quo et ipsi infantes in matris 
 suae utero polluti sunt, quodque veluti radix omne peccatorum
 
 94 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 genus in homine producit ideoque ita foedum et exsecrabile est 
 coram deo, ut ad generis hum. condemnationem sufficiat. 
 
 Canon. Dordr. cap. iii. art. 1 : Libera sua voluntate a deo 
 desciscens (homo) eximiis istis donis (justitiae cet.) se ipsum 
 orbavit, atque e contrario eorum loco coecitatem, horribiles 
 tenebras, vanitatem ac perversitatem judicii in mente, mali- 
 tiam, rebellionem ac duritiem in voluntate et corde, impurita- 
 tem denique in omnibus affectibus contraxit. 
 
 Cateck. Heidelb. 7 : Through the fall and disobedience of 
 our first parents . . . our nature has been so poisoned that 
 we are all conceived and born in sin. 8 : Are we then so 
 corrupted that we are altogether unable for anything good 
 and inclined only to evil? Yes, unless we are regenerate 
 through God's Spirit 
 
 V. ARMENIAN. 
 
 Conf. Bern, vii 3 sq. : Per transgressionem factus est homo 
 (Adam) ex vi comminationis divinse reus aeternae mortis ac 
 multiplicis miseries, exutus est primaeva ilia felicitate, quam in 
 creatione acceperat cet. Quia vero Ad. stirps ac radix erat 
 totius generis humani, ideo non se ipsum tantum sed omnes 
 etiam posteros suos, qui quasi in lumbis ipsius conclusi erant 
 et ex ipso per naturalem generationem prodituri, eidem morti 
 ac miseria3 involvit et una secum implicuit, adeo ut omnes 
 horn, sine ullo discrimine, excepto solo J. Ch., per hoc uni- 
 cum Ad. peccatum privati sint primaeval ilia felicitate et des- 
 tituti vera justitia" ad aet. salutem consequendam necessaria, 
 adeoque morti illi et multiplici miseries etiam nunc obnoxii 
 nascantur. 
 
 limborch, Theol. Christ, iii 3. 4: Fatemur, etiam infantes 
 nasci minus puros, quam Adamus fuit creatus, et cum quadam 
 propensione ad peccandum : illam autem habent non tarn ab 
 Adamo, quam a proximis parentibus, cum, si ab Adamo esset, 
 in omnibus hominibus debeat esse sequalis. Jam autem ad- 
 modum est inaequalis, et ordinarie inclinant liberi in peccata 
 parentum. 
 
 Id. v. 15. 15 : Hand illubentes fatemur, nos temperamento 
 minus puro nasci ac proinde inclinationem nostram in res
 
 EESULTS OF THE FALL. 95 
 
 earni gratas esse vehementiorem, quam in priniis nostris 
 parentibus fuit, unde fit, ut facilius incitemur ad motus in- 
 ordinatos. Quoniam enim nascimur ex parentibus peccato 
 assuetis atque ista" assuetudine ratione temperament! non 
 parum immutatis, fieri non potest, quin et temperamentum 
 minus purum in nos propagent. Atqui ilia physica est im- 
 puritas, non moralis, et tantum abest ut sit vere ac proprie 
 dictum peccatum, ut motus primi inde orti materia sint vir- 
 tutis exercendae. Thus is vindicated for man the natural 
 ability to know God by the light of nature. Vid. limb. Theol. 
 Ch. iii. 4. 2, iv. 11. 7. 
 
 VI. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. Racov. p. 21 : Homo morti est obnoxius, quod primus 
 homo apertum dei mandatum, cui adjuncta fuit mortis com- 
 minatio, transgressus fuit. Unde porro factum est, ut univer- 
 sam suam posteritatem secum in eadem mortis jura traxerit, 
 accedente tamen cujusvis in adultioribus proprio delicto, cujus 
 deinde vis per apertam dei legem, quam homines transgressi 
 fuerant, aucta est. Cf. F. Socin. Opp. i. p. 122 b. 
 
 II. p. 294: Peccatum originis quid sit, nondum inter auc- 
 tores ipsos convenit. Hoc certum est, per Ad. lapsum haud- 
 quaquam hominis naturani ita vitiatam esse, ut in iis, quse 
 deus ab ipso idque sub pcense comminatione aut prsemii pol- 
 licitatione requirat, obediendi vel non obediendi deo libertate 
 et arbitrio privatus sit. . . . Et lapsus Adse, cum unus actus 
 fuerit, vim earn, quae depravare ipsam naturam Adami, multo 
 minus vero posterorum ipsius posset, habere non potuit. Non 
 negamus tamen, assiduitate peccandi naturam hominum labe 
 quadam et ad peccandum nimia proclivitate infectam esse. 
 Sed earn vel peccatum per se esse vel talem esse negamus, ut 
 homo vim sibi facere non possit, divino spir. hausto, et hac- 
 tenus deo obedire quatenus id ab ipso pro sua" sumrna bonitate 
 et aequitate exigit. Cf. Socin. prcekct. c. iv. p. 541 ; c. 5, 
 de libero arbitrio. 
 
 F. Socini de Christo servat. iv. 6 : Falluntur egregie, qui 
 peccatum originis imputatione aliquS, pro eS, parte, quse ad 
 reatum spectat, contineri autumant, cum omnis reatus ex sola
 
 96 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 generis propagatione fluat. Gravius autem multo labuntur, 
 qui pro ea parte, quse ad corruptionem pertinet, ex pcena 
 ipsius delicti Adami illud fluxisse affirmant. Qua enim vel 
 auctoritate vel ratione unquam, non dicam probabunt, sed 
 leviter alicui persuadebunt, Adamum ut sui delicti poenam 
 mentis ac voluntatis corruptionem incurrisse, quse deinde in 
 nobis propagatione ingenita fuerit? Imo quid absurdius et 
 deo indignius excogitari potuit, quam Adamo ejusmodi pcenam 
 ob delictum inflictam fuisse, propter quam a peccando in 
 futurum abstinere non posset ? . . . Corruptio nostra et ad 
 peccandum proclivitas non ex uno illo delicto in nos propagata 
 est, sed continuatis actibus habitus modo hujus modo illius 
 vitii est- comparatus, quo naturam nostram corrumpente ea 
 corruptio deinde per generis propagationem in nos est derivata. 
 Neque vero si Ad. non deliquisset, propterea vel nos a peccatis 
 immunes fuissemus vel in hanc naturae corruptionem incurrere 
 non potuissemus, dummodo ut ille habuit, sic nos quoque 
 voluntatem ad malum liberam habuissemus. 
 
 VII. QUAKEE. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. iv. 5 : That Adam is a public person 
 is not denied, and that through him there is a seed of sin 
 propagated to all men, which in its own nature is sinful, and 
 inclines men to iniquity ; yet it will not follow from thence 
 that infants, who join not with this seed, are guilty. As for 
 these words in the Romans, the reason of the guilt there 
 alleged is, For that all have sinned. Now no man is said to 
 sin unless he actually sin in his own person; for the Greek 
 words efi at may very well relate to Bavdrw, which is the 
 nearest antecedent, so that they hold forth how that Adam, 
 by his sin, gave an entrance to sin in the world ; and, so death 
 entered by sin. That we confess, then, that a seed of sin 
 semen peccati is transmitted to all men from Adam, although 
 imputed to none, until by sinning they actually join with it, 
 in which seed he gave occasion to all to sin ; and it is the 
 origin of all evil actions and thoughts in men's hearts, e<' $, 
 to wit, 6avdra>, as it is in Eom. v., i.e. in which death all have 
 sinned. For this seed of sin is frequently called death in the
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 97 
 
 Scripture, and the lody of death, seeing, indeed, it is a death 
 to the life of righteousness and holiness ; therefore its seed 
 and its product is called the old man, the old Adam, in which 
 all sin is, for which we use this name to express this sin, and 
 not that of original sin, of which phrase the Scripture makes no 
 mention, and under which invented and unscriptural barbarism 
 this notion of imputed sin to infants took place among Chris- 
 tians. Prop. v. 17: Human nature, which, though of itself 
 wholly corrupted and defiled, and prone to evil, yet is capable 
 to be wrought upon by the grace of God ; even as iron, though 
 an hard and cold metal of itself, may be warmed and softened 
 
 by the heat of the fire, and wax melted by the sun. 
 
 
 
 VIII. MENNONITES. 
 
 According to the Mennonites, Adam and his descendants 
 lost through the first sin the divine image, holiness, and im- 
 mortality. Schyn, Plen. deduct, p. 240 : An evil concupiscence 
 is inherited by all ; but with this there is a permanent 
 facultas occurrens et adeo oblatum bonum audiendi, admit- 
 tendi aut rejiciendi the faculty of hearing, and receiving or 
 rejecting good (Pas, Conf. art. 5). 
 
 Observations. 
 
 1. How it was possible to Adam to transgress the divine com- 
 mandment, the symbols nowhere attempt to investigate. They allude 
 to seduction through the serpent, and teach that Adam fell sud culpd 
 (Conf. Helv. p. 54 ; Helv. ii. 8 ; Gall. 9 ; Belg. 14 ; Syn. Dord. iii. 1), 
 or through abuse of his freedom (Conf . Sax. p. 54; Helv. ii. 9). As to 
 the relation of this sin to the sanctitas concreata, or increated holiness, 
 the Protestant symbols maintain silence. So also they say nothing 
 as to the relation which God may be supposed to bear to this sin, 
 save that the Form. Cons. Helv. 4 speaks of a permittere lapsum, while 
 the other symbols are content to specify that God was not the causa 
 and auctor malt (A. C. p. 15 ; F. C. 799 ; Dec. Thor. ii. 3. 1). But 
 the Arminian Conf. Rem. is more full on this subject. 
 
 2. As original sin is propagated by natural generation (A. C. p. 9 ; 
 F. C. 644 ; Eng. Art. ix. ; Conf. Belg. 15), it follows that Christ, as 
 conceived supernaturally in the womb of the Virgin, was free from 
 original sin (Cat. maj. 495 ; F. C. 574, 648 ; Eng. Art, xv. ; Conf. 
 Bel(j. 18 ; Dec. Thor. 23). Withal, the Virgin herself in the Pro- 
 
 G
 
 98 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 testant symbols is not excepted from the general law of the race in 
 relation to original sin (Dec. Thor.). 
 
 3. [The Roman Catholic Church, on the other hand, teaches that 
 the Virgin Mary was protected from original sin at the first moment 
 of her being conceived, by a special privilege. Pius ix. in his Bull 
 Ineffabilis (Dec. 8, 1854) : Declaramus, pronuntiamus et definimus, 
 doctrinam, quae tenet, beatissimam virginem Mariam in primo instanti 
 suse conceptionis fuisse singulari omnipotentis Dei gratia et privilegio, 
 intuitu meritorum Christi Jesu salvatoris humani generis, ab omni 
 originalis culpae labe prseservatam immunem, esse a Deo revelatam, 
 atque idcirco ab omnibus fidelibus firmiter constanterque credendam. 
 Quapropter si qui secus ac a nobis definitum est, quod Deus avertat, 
 praesumpserint corde sentire, ii noverint ac porro sciant, se proprio 
 judicio condemnatos, naufragium circa fidem passes esse, et ab unitate 
 ecclesiae defecisse. This Bull is printed fully in Chemnicii Exam. 
 Cone. Trid. (ed. Preuss), Berlin 1862. Its explanation, however, is 
 to be sought in the Constit. Sollicitudo of Pope Alexander VH., to 
 which it expressly refers ; and this is found in the same edition of 
 Chemnitz. The originator of this new Romish doctrine was Duns 
 Scotus; its promoters have been the University of Paris and the 
 Franciscans. The salient points in its development have been the 
 Council of Basle, and the Popes Sixtus iv., Alexander vn., and 
 Clement xi. The history of the dogma has been given in a work on 
 the subject by Preuss, Berlin 1865.] 
 
 IL SECOND POINT OF DIVEKGENCE. 
 
 All the communities which assume a conniption of man- 
 kind as it now is, inherited or transmitted from Adam, with 
 the solitary exception of the Quakers, regard that corruption 
 under the aspect of sin properly so called, or of an inherited 
 condemnation, on account of which men are regarded as sin- 
 ners in the sight of God. The Eoman Catholic standards, in 
 harmony with their views of the evil resulting from the Fall, 
 make original sin consist only in the habitualis aversio a dco 
 resulting from the carentia, just. orig. ; while they regard the 
 prava concupiscentia, being something belonging to man's 
 nature itself, that is, the vulnera or wound of that nature, 
 not as sin properly so called. The Protestants, on the 
 other hand, call original sin the total depravation of human
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 99 
 
 nature (in spiritual things) ; consequently they regard it as 
 the prava concupiscentia itself, and before it issues in actual 
 sin. The Quakers would have the universal depravation of 
 the natural man, the wicked semen in him, to be called sin 
 only when it is developed into actual sin. Similarly the 
 Mennonites. The Socinians and later Arminians reject the 
 idea of original condemnation altogether, and regard even the 
 death which has been transmitted from Adam to all his 
 posterity as not being, touching the latter, the punishment of 
 sin, but as something brought upon man by generation, and 
 consequently natural evil alone. The inborn tendency to sin 
 they cannot, according to their views of the Tall, reckon as 
 something inherited from Adam. 
 
 Since the Eomanists deem the concupiscentia carnis, concu- 
 piscence, not to be an evil quality introduced into human 
 nature, but something natural 1 springing from the sense-element 
 in man, or his sensuousness, they therefore cannot regard this 
 as having in it anything imputable, and consequently do not 
 hold it to be sin properly so called: the mere pronitas ad 
 malum is not sin of itself (Bellarmine, Amiss. Grat. v. 7). It 
 is sin only metonymically, inasmuch as actual sin springs out 
 of this concupiscence (Confut. A. C. 2) ; not so much peccatum 
 as materiale peccati? The reatus, or guilt, of original sin extends 
 therefore only to the carentia justitice originalis, which is an 
 habitual departure from God. As to the mdnera natures, 
 which are not the very original sin itself, see Bellarmine, 
 Amiss. Ch^at. v. 4. 
 
 1 That is to say, if we suppose the supernatural gift of original righteousness 
 withdrawn from man, the contest between the flesh and the spirit would arise 
 naturally of itself (Mbhler). The lusts of the flesh, if they overpower the spirit, 
 engender sin ; but they are not of themselves, and as such, sin (Baur, Gegensatz, 
 S. 33). Thus is explained the origination of actual sin in human nature, without 
 the necessity of assuming any evil quality or bias additionally infused into that 
 nature. Hence Bellarmine, De gratid prim. horn. c. 5 : non deterior est 
 humana natura, si culpam naturalem detrahat, nequemagis ignorantia et infirmi- 
 tate laborat, quarn essel et Idboraret in puris naturalibus condita. 
 
 2 Duns Scotus says : Peccatum originale formaliter est carentia justitia orig. 
 debitse, concupiscentia est materiale peccati originalis, quia per privationem 
 justitise originalis ipsa non positive, sed per privationem fit prona ad concupis- 
 cendum delectabilis.
 
 100 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. Roc. qu. 423 : Peccatum originis nullum prorsus est. 
 Nee enim e scripturS, id peccatum originis doceri potest, et 
 lapsus Adas cum unus actus fuerit, vim earn, quse depravare 
 ipsam naturam Adami, multo minus vero posterorum ejus 
 posset, habere non potuit. Ipsi vero id (depravationem 
 naturae) in pcenam irrogatum fuisse, nee scriptura docet, uti 
 superius exposuimus, et deum ilium, qui aequitatis fons est, 
 incredibile prorsus est id facere voluisse. 
 
 F. Socin. Prcelectt. c. 4 : Concludimus ... ex peccato illo 
 primi parentis nullam labem aut pravitatem universe generi 
 hum. necessario ingenitam esse, nee aliud malum ex primo illo 
 delicto ad posteros omnes necessario manasse, quam moriencli 
 omnimodam necessitatem, non quidem ex ipsius delicti vi, sed 
 quia, cum jam homo natura mortalis esset, ob delictum illud 
 suse naturali mortalitati a deo relictus est. . . . Quare, qui ex 
 ipso nascuntur, eadem conditione nasci omnes oportet. 
 
 Only in one passage (dc CJiristo Servo, iv. 6) does Socinus 
 call the necessity of dying a reatus delictorum nostrorum. But 
 this does not indicate that the sin of Adam had been actually 
 imputed to his descendants ; for this would be in direct oppo- 
 sition to the whole Socinian system. Bcatus signifies to him 
 only damnum, noxa, malum ex alterius culpd proficisccns. 
 
 II. ARMINIAN. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Eemonstr. p. 84 b : Peccatum originate nee 
 habent (Remonstrantes) pro peccato proprie dicto, quod pos- 
 teros Adami odio dei dignos faciat, nee pro malo, quod per 
 modum proprie dictse pcense ab Adamo in posteros dimanet, 
 sed pro malo, infirmitate, vitio aut quocunque tandem alio 
 nomine vocetur, quod ab Adamo justitia" originali private in 
 posteros ejus propagatur : unde fit, ut posteri omnes Adami 
 eadem justitia destituti, prorsus inepti et inidonei sint ad vitam 
 seternam consequendum, aut in gratiam cum deo redeant, nisi 
 deus nova gratia sua eos prseveniat, et vires novas iis restituat 
 ac sufficiat, quibus ad earn possint pervenire. Atque hoc sig-
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 101 
 
 nificatum a deo credunt ejectione Adami ex paradise, typo caeli, 
 et obsidione vise, qua ad ilium patebat aditus : Hrec enim cala- 
 mitas non tantum evenit Adamo, sed posteris omnibus Adami 
 fuit cum eo communis. Peccatum autem originis non esse 
 malum culpae proprie dictse, quod vocant, ratio manifesta arguit : 
 malum culpse non est, quia nasci plane involuntarium est, ergo 
 et nasci cum hac aut ilia labe, infirmitate, vitio vel malo. Si 
 malum culpse non est, nee potest esse malum pcense, quia culpa 
 et poena sunt relata. Culpa autem in posteris Adami alia esse 
 non poterat, quam hsec ; alia enim prior concipi non potest, quia 
 alioquin non esset culpa seu peccatum originis. Multo minus 
 itaque fieri potest, ut sit culpa siinul et pcena. Prseterquam 
 enim quod nihil indignius deo tribui possit, quam quod pecca- 
 torum peccato, quo de novo reus sit pcense, puniat ; adeo 
 diversa sunt culpa et pcena, ut prorsus sint incompatibilia. 
 Pcena enim est actus dei et actus justitise ; culpa actus homi- 
 nis et aBiKta. Pcena est involuntaria : culpa, nisi sit voluntaria, 
 culpa esse non potest. Et cum deus puniendo hominern in 
 ordinem cogere intendat, ista punitione novain inordinationem 
 voluntati hominis injiceret, et sua punitione sibi ipsi novae 
 poense occasionem daret, atque ita rationem justitise et ordinem 
 omnem pcense turbaret in infinitum usque. Malum itaque 
 cum sit, necesse est, ut sit illud malum, quod Eemonstrantes 
 statuunt. 
 
 Limborch, Theol. christ. iii. 4. 4 : Nullam scriptura in in- 
 fantibus corruptionem esse docet, quse vere ac proprie sit pec- 
 catum. 4. 5 : Absurdum est statuere, deum homines punivisse 
 corruptione tali, quse vere ac proprie dictum est peccatum, et 
 ex qua omnia actualia peccata tanquam ex fonte necessario 
 scaturiunt, et deinde propter illam corruptionem homines denuo 
 punire pcena inferni. 4. 6 : Concipi non potest, quomodo 
 peccatum hoc propagetur. Non enim inhseret animse, quse 
 immediate, etiam juxta communem horum doctomm opinio- 
 nem, a deo creatur, ac proinde, si peccato esset infecta, pecca- 
 tum illud a deo esset. 4. 7 : Nullum peccatum pcena dignum 
 est involuntarium, quia nihil magis debet esse voluntarium, 
 quam quod hominein pcenae et quidem gravissimse, seternse 
 nempe et summorum cruciatuum, reum facit. Atqui corruptio 
 originaria est involuntaria.
 
 102 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Ib. iii. 4. 1 : Inclinatio ilia (ad peccandum) proprie dictum 
 peccatum non est aut peccati habitus ab Adamo in ipsos pro- 
 pagatus, sed naturalis tantum inclinatio habendi id, quod carni 
 gratum est, quae proprie oritur a temperamento corporis, quod 
 a proximis parentibus propagari scimus. Pro diversa enim 
 temperamenti ratione animus hominis diversimode a variis 
 objectis afficitur, quodque uni gratum alteri ingratum est ; 
 inde diversae adeo in hominibus cupiditates, dum unusquisque 
 appetit, quod pro temperamenti sui ratione ipsi gratum est, ac 
 aversatur ingratum. Quia vero carni nostrae grata plerumque 
 voluntati divinae adversantur, quoniam. deus in hisce abnegan- 
 dis promtam auimi nostri obedientiam explorare vult, inde est, 
 quod ilia inclinatio in objecta carni nostrse grata sit etiam 
 inclinatio in peccatum (cf. iii. 3. 4). iii. 4. 24 : Ad ejusmodi 
 generis mala, quae neutra sunt, corruptio ilia, quaecunque nobis 
 a natura inest, referri debet ; nempe non est peccatum neque 
 poena, nostri respectu : est tamen malum aliquod naturale, 
 quod ex occasione pcenae Adamo inflictse ad nos promanavit, 
 seu carentia boni cujusdam, quo alias gavisi fuissemus, quoniam 
 Adamus bonum, quo ipse propter peccatum spoliatus est, ad 
 nos propagare non potuit. 
 
 Ib. iii 3. 19 : Dicimus, deum innoxios posteros non punire 
 ob peccatum Adami; poena enim delictum non excedit, sed 
 malis hujus vitae ac tandem morti subjicere, quia ex Adamo 
 peccatore geniti sunt, non ut in ipsis Adami peccatum puniat 
 cet. iii 3. 1 : Mors non habet rationem pcenae proprie dictae 
 in posteris, fieri enim nequit, ut insontes propter alterius pec- 
 catum puniantur, sed est naturalis tantum moriendi necessitas 
 ab Adamo mortis pcena punito in ipsos derivata. 
 
 III. ROMAN. 
 
 Whether the relation of man, naturally engendered of the 
 offspring of Adam, to God is that of a sinner, cannot be 
 determined with any certainty from the Cat. Eom. i. 3. 2 : 
 peccatum, et peccati po2nam in uno Adamo non constitisse, sed 
 ex eo tanquam ex semine et caussa ad omnem posteritatem 
 jure permanasse. For peccatum here may be the sin which 
 springs from the inborn concupiscence. So also Cone. Trid.
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 103 
 
 sess. v. 2 is ambiguous. But a proper inherited sin (or moral 
 condemnation in the sight of God) is enforced on us by No. 3 
 of that session : hoc Adse peccatum, quod origine unum est et 
 propagatione, non imitatione transfusum, omnibus inest uni- 
 cuique proprium (cf. Trid. sess. vi. 3). The declaration that 
 even the children of Christians, before they themselves can sin, 
 originalis peccati nihil non traxisse ex Adam, and therefore 
 need an expiatio through baptism, confirms the same argument. 
 So also No. 5, where we read of a reatus ex Adami semine. 
 Bellarmine, Amiss, gr. iv. 2 : " We confess that in man, born 
 of seed propagated from Adam, there is reatus qiiidam, a cer- 
 tain guilt and spot, which makes the man himself truly and 
 properly a sinner, and marks him for eternal banishment from 
 God." Cf. v. 1 7 : " Original sin is not less properly and truly 
 sin than personal." 
 
 But what is it that in the natural man has the character of 
 (inherited) sin ? The symbols give this no direct answer. The 
 Eomish theology, however, has always explained the carentia 
 justitise originalis inesse debitae as being original sin, although 
 with a variety of denning clauses ; or, as Bellarmine expresses 
 it, the habitualis aversio et obliquitas voluntatis, quae et macula 
 men tern deo invisam reddens appellari potest. Cf. De Amiss. 
 gr. v. 19 : " Therefore the privation of the gift of original 
 righteousness is called original sin, so far as this is connected 
 with habitual aversion from God." Klee, Dogm. ii. 346. On 
 this point some extended extracts from Bellarmine may be 
 given : 
 
 Bellarmini Amiss, grat. v. 1 V : Sciendum est, peccati nomen 
 bifariam accipi solere. Uno modo pro transgressione prsecepti, 
 alio modo pro eo, quod remanet in animS, peccatoris post ac- 
 tionem illam transgressionis praecepti. . . . Quod autem post 
 actionem peccati aliquid maneat, quod sit et dicatur proprie 
 peccatum, ex eo potest intelligi, quod, qui peccatum commise- 
 runt, dicuntur ab omnibus post actionem peccati proprie et 
 formaliter peccatores ; item dicuntur esse in peccato, habere 
 peccatum, mundati a peccato cet. . . . Quamvis autem id, quod 
 remanet post actionem, sit aliquo modo effectus ejusdem ac- 
 tionis, tamen est etiam aliquo modo idem cum ipsa actione, et 
 ideo non per figuram metonymies, sed proprie dicitur peccatum ;
 
 104 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 et duplex ilia significatio peccati non est significatio duarum 
 rerum sive duorum peccatorum, sed unius et ejusdem alio atque 
 alio modo se habentis. . . . Peccati perversio sive obliquitas, 
 ut est in motu, dicitur peccatum in priore significatione, ut 
 autem permanet in anima peccantis, die. peccatum in signifi- 
 catione posteriore. Nam sicut, qui a sole avertitur, manet 
 aversus in tenebris, donee ad solem iterum revertatur, et qui 
 ab aliquo recedit, manet in ea distantia, donee iterum accedat : 
 sic etiam qui per peccatum a deo avertitur et recedit, non 
 solum dum peccat, sed etiam postquam peccavit, manet a deo 
 aversus et longe dissitus, donee per pcenitentiam convertatur 
 et revertatur ad deum. Itaque peccatum in priore significa- 
 tione unum est duntaxat omnium hominum, sed in Adamo 
 actuale et personale, in nobis originale dicitur. Solus enim 
 ipse actuali voluntate illud commisit : nobis vero communi- 
 catur per generationem eo modo, quo commumcari potest id 
 quod transiit, nimirum per imputationeni. Omnibus enim 
 imputatur, qui ex Adamo nascuntur, quoniam omnes in lumbis 
 Adami existentes in eo et per euni peccavimus, cum ipse 
 peccavit. 
 
 IV. GREEK. 
 
 The Greek symbols only assert firmly the reality of original 
 sin, without more distinctly indicating wherein that sin con- 
 sists. Conf. ortlwd. p. 53 : Ka#o>? oXot ot avdpanroi rjaav ei? 
 TTJV KardcTrcunv TIJS a#6>OT77TO? et? rov 'ABdp, reVota? Xeyy?}? real 
 a<fi ov <r<f>a\ev, oXot ecr<f>a\av et? avrov nai ep.eivav et? 
 Karda-racriv T}? a/wtprta?' Sta TOVTO o%i fiovov et? rrjv 
 Tiav vTTOKeivrai, fia /cat et? TIJV rij^wpiav Sia rrjv a/jiapTiav. 
 
 From the Greeks' doctrine (see below) on the extinction of 
 original sin by baptism, it may be seen that they cannot have 
 held evil concupiscence as the properly sinful thing in the 
 natural man. 
 
 V. LUTHERAN. 
 
 C. A. p. 10 : Decent, quod hie morbus seu vitium originis 
 vere sit peccatum, damnans et afferens nunc quoque seternam
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 105 
 
 mortem his, qui noil renascuntur per baptisnmm et Spiritum 
 sanctum. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 315 : Per Adami inobedientiam omnes homines 
 facti sunt peccatores, morti et diabolo obnoxii. 
 
 F. C. p. 639: (Lutherus significavit) etiamsi homo prorsus 
 nihil mali cogitaret, loqueretur aut ageret, tamen nihilominus 
 hominis naturam et personam esse peccatricem, h. e. peccato 
 originali prorsus et totaliter . . . coram deo infectam, venenatam. 
 . . . Et propter hanc corruptionem atque primorum nostrorum 
 parentum lapsum natura aut persona hominis lege dei accusa- 
 tur et condemnatur cet. Ibid, quod hoc hsereditarium malum 
 sit culpa seu reatus, quo fit, ut omnes propter inobedientiam 
 Adae et Hevse in odio apud deum et natura filii irse simus. Of. 
 p. 642. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 57: Disputant (adversarii), concupiscentiam 
 poenam esse, non peccatum, Lutherus defendit peccatum esse. 
 Supra dictum est (p. 54), Augustinum definire peccatum ori- 
 ginis, quod sit concupiscentia. Expostulent cum Augustino, 
 si quid habet incommodi haec sententia. Preeterea Paulus ait 
 (Eom. vii. 7) : concupiscentiam nesciebam esse peccatum, nisi 
 lex diceret : Non concupisces. Item (Eom. vii. 2 3) : Video 
 aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et 
 captivantem me legi peccati, quae est in membris meis. Hsec 
 testimonia nulla cavillatione everti possunt. Clare enim ap- 
 pellant concupiscentiam peccatum cet. 
 
 F. C. p. 575: Eejicimus et damnamus dogma illud, quo 
 asseritur, concupiscentias pravas non esse peccatum sed con- 
 creatas naturae conditiones et proprietates quasdam essentiales. 
 
 VI. REFORMED. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 11 : Credimus hoc vitium (originis, as de- 
 fined in Art. ix.) esse vere peccatum, quod omnes et singulos 
 homines, ne parvulis quidem exceptis adhuc in utero matrum 
 delitescentibus, seternae mortis reos coram deo peragat. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 15 : Est peccatum originis . . . vitium 
 haereditarium, quo et ipsi infantes in matris suae utero polluti 
 sunt . . . estque ita foedum et exsecrabile coram deo, ut ad 
 generis humani condemnationem sufficiat.
 
 106 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Declar. Thonin. ii. 3. 7 : . . . pravitatis reliquiae (in renatis) 
 videl. pravse incliuationes et motus concupiscentiae, quae proinde 
 vere et proprie peccatum dicitur, non tantum, quatenus est 
 pcena et causa peccati, sed etiam quatenus ipsa cum legi dei 
 turn spiritui gratias repugnat 
 
 Thirty-nine Articles, art. ix. ut supra. 
 
 Calvin, Institt. christ. i. 1. 8 : Haec duo distincte observanda : 
 nempe, quod sic omnibus naturae nostrae partibus vitiati per- 
 versique, jam ob talem duntaxat corruptionem damnati merito 
 convictique coram deo tenemur, cui nihil est acceptum nisi 
 justitia, innocentia. Neque ista est alieni delicti obligatio; 
 quod enim dicitur, nos per Adami peccatum obnoxios esse 
 factos dei judicio, non ita est accipiendum, ac si insontes ipsi 
 et immerentes culpam delicti ejus sustineremus, sed quia per 
 ejus transgressionem maledictione induti sumus omnes, dicitur 
 ille nos obstrinxisse. Ab illo tamen non sola in nos poana 
 grassata est, sed instillata ab ipso lues in nobis residet, cui 
 jure pcena debetur. Quare Augustinus, utcunque alienum 
 peccatum saepe vocet (quo clarius ostendat propagine in nos 
 derivari), simul tamen et proprium unicuique asserit. Et 
 apostolus ipse disertissime testatur, ideo mortem in omnes 
 pervagatam, quod omnes peccarint, Le. involuti sint original! 
 peccato et ejus maculis inquinatL Atque ideo infantes quo- 
 que ipsi, dum suam secum damnationem a matris utero 
 afferunt, non alieno, sed suo ipsorum vitio sunt obstricti. 
 Nam tametsi suae iniquitatis fructus nondum protulerint, 
 habent tamen in se inclusum semen: ideo non odiosa et 
 abominabilis deo esse non potest. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 If original sin is supposed to be only a defect, or an evil that 
 has come upon mankind, the inheriting of such an evil is sufficiently 
 explained by pointing to the fact that Adam was the original pro- 
 genitor of the race. But if an original guilt is imported into the 
 doctrine, a guilt that, since the transgression of Adam, has clung to 
 all human individuals, there arises a more important question, that 
 is, how far anything inherited may involve guilt. The Komish 
 symbols say nothing on this subject ; but the theologians (including 
 in the notion of sin the free consent of the individual ; cf. Bellarm. 
 De amiss, gr. i. 1) adopt the idea of an imputation, the foundation
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 107 
 
 of which is laid by the derivation of all from Adam. Bellarm. 
 Amiss. Gr. v. 1 7 ; Mbhler, Symb. 5 (cf. Conf. orihod. 53). This thought 
 is not absent from the Protestant symbols, at least they do not ex- 
 clude an imputatio peccati Adamitici (Apol. p. 51 ; F. C. 642), though 
 rejecting this as the sole foundation for original sin. The Form. Cone. 
 says : Propter nostram corruptionem et primorum parentum lapsum 
 natura aut persona hominis lege dei accusatur et condemnatur. And 
 again : Haereditarium malum est culpa seu reatus, quo fit, tit omnes 
 propter inobedientiam Adae et Hevae in odio apud deum et natura 
 filii irae simus, though this latter propter may be viewed as an imme- 
 diate cause. But this view is found in the private writings of 
 Luther and Melancthon. An imputation is plainly taught by the 
 Form. Com. Helv. 10 : Censemus, peccatum Adami omnibus ejus 
 posteris judicio dei arcano et justo imputari. . . . Duplici nomine post 
 peccatum homo natura indeque ab ortu suo, antequam ilium actuale 
 peccatum in se admittat, iraa et maledictioni divinae obnoxius est, 
 primum quidem ob -7ra,pdxru/j,a et inobedientiam, quam in Adami 
 lumbis commisit, deinde ob consequentem in ipso conceptu haeredi- 
 tariam corruptionem insitam cet. In this passage, it is at the same 
 time indicated that by the in quo peccarunt the theory of imputation 
 receives its welcome support. But, in fact, the Reformers did not 
 reduce the original guilt of the natural man to mere imputation : 
 they saw in the inborn corruption itself something offensive to the 
 all-holy God, and therefore condemnable in His sight ; whence it ap- 
 pears that they held a definition of sin which does not necessarily 
 require the free consent of the individual (cf. Apol. A. C. 581 ; 
 Parei Corp. Doct. Chr. 38, 41) as lying at the foundation of their 
 doctrine. See Melanc. Loci, i. 86 ; Calvin, Inslitt. ii. 1. 8. And 
 this explains the propter alienam culpam of Apol. 51; cf. Heidegger, 
 Corp. x. 48. The Socinians must naturally, as denying all original 
 sin, reject the imputation of Adam's transgression. Cf. on Rom. 
 v. 12: Socin. Prcelect. c. 4; De Chr. Serv. iv. 6; Cat. Rac. qu. 
 426. 
 
 ARMINIAN SYMBOLS. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Hem. p. 84 a : Fatentur Eem. 3 peccatum Adami a 
 deo imputation dici posse posteris ejus, quatenus deus posteros 
 Ad. eidem malo, cui Adamus per peccatum obnoxium se red- 
 didit, obnoxios nasci voluit, sive quatenus deus malum, quod 
 in poenam Adamo inflictum fuerat, in posteros ejus dimanare 
 et transire permisit. At nihil cogit eos dicere, peccatum Ad. 
 posteris ejus sic fuisse a deo imputatum, quasi deus posteros
 
 108 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Ad. revera censuisset ejusdem cum Adamo peccati et culpce, 
 quam Ad. commiserat, reos. . . . 
 
 Limborch, Tlieol. christ. iiL 3. 8 : Quod itaque imputatio- 
 nem peccati Adami attinet, qua statuitur, deum primum 
 Adami et Evas peccatum omnibus ipsorum posteris ita im- 
 putasse, ut omnium peccatum sit omnesque in Adaino pecca- 
 verint et propterea mortis ac condemnations seternae rei facti 
 sint, earn impugnamus. 
 
 Original Sin and Baptism. 
 
 Original sin, as defined by the Protestants, is not effaced by bap- 
 tism ; the imputation of it is removed. Its total abolition must, as 
 it has seized human nature in its inmost recesses, be awaited in the 
 resurrection alone. The Romish Church, on the other hand, hold 
 original sin to be removed by baptism, which restores the righteous- 
 ness acceptable to God ; for the prava concupiscentia, which remains 
 even in the baptized as the fames peccati, or fuel of sin, is not in 
 itself of the nature of sin. 
 
 I. BOMAK. 
 
 Concil. Trid. sess. v. 5 : Si quis per J. Ch. gratiam, quae in 
 bapt. confertur, reatum originalis peccati remitti negat, aut 
 etiam asserit non tolli totum id, quod veram et propriam 
 peccati rationem habet, sed illud dicit tantum radi aut non 
 imputari, anathema sit, in renatis enim nihil odit deus cet. 
 Manere autem in baptizatis concupiscentiam vel fomitem, 
 sancta syn. fatetur et sentit, quse cum ad agonem relicta sit, 
 nocere non consentientibus, sed utiliter per Ch. gratiam repug- 
 nantibus non valet. Hanc concupiscentiam, quam aliquando 
 Apost. peccatum appellat, sancta syn. declarat, ecclesiam cath. 
 nunquam intellexisse peccatum appellari, quod vere et proprie 
 in renatis peccatum sit, sed quia ex peccato est et ad pecca- 
 tum inclinat. 
 
 Cf. Bellarmini Amiss, grat. v. 5. 7. 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Confess. ortJiod. p. 282 : To irpo-TraropiKov ap-uprrj^ia fie 
 ovSefj,iav fterdvoiav elvai Svvarov va e^a\ei<p0^, povov /xe TT)J/
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 109 
 
 yapiv rov deov a^avi^erat, &ta rrjs eV aapxl oltcovofJLia<; rov Kvp. 
 I. X. real TT}? K^yffeco<i rov rifiiov at/iaro? avrov, KOL rovro 
 <yiverai pe ro /jiva'rijpiov 'rov ay. /3a7rTiV/LtaT09. Cf. p. 157. 
 
 III. PKOTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 56 : Semper ita scripsit (Luth.), quod bap- 
 tismus tollat reatum peccati orig., tametsi materiale, ut isti 
 vocant, peccati maneat, videL concupiscentia. Cf. p. 57. 
 
 F. C. p. 575 : Affirmamus, quod hanc naturae corruptionem 
 ab ipsa natura nemo nisi solus deus separare queat, id quod 
 per mortem in beata ilia resurrectione plene fiet. Ibi enim 
 ipsa natura nostra absque peccato orig. et ab eodem omnino 
 separata et remota resurget et seternS, felicitate fruetur. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 11 : Affirmamus, hoc vitium (orig.) etiam 
 post bapt. esse vere peccatum, quod ad culpam attinet, quani- 
 vis qui filii dei sunt, minime idcirco condemnentur, quoniam 
 videl. deus illud ipsis non imputat. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 1 5 : Nee per bapt. (peccatum orig.) penitus 
 exstinguitur aut radicitus evellitur, . . . quamvis dei filiis in 
 condemnationem id non imputetur, verum gratiS, et miseri- 
 cordia ejus condonetur. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. ix. : And this infection of nature doth 
 remain, yea in them that are regenerated ; whereby the lust of 
 the flesh is not subject to the law of God. And though there 
 is no condemnation for them that believe and are baptized, yet 
 the apostle doth confess that concupiscence and lust hath of 
 itself the nature of sin. 
 
 Cf. Dec. Thorun. ii. 3. 7. 
 
 IV. AEMINIAN. 
 
 The Arminians do not discern sin in the inclinatio ad pec- 
 candum ; not only so, they also deny that this inclination 
 remains necessarily in the regenerate all through life, or that 
 there must of necessity be in consequence a conflict between 
 the flesh and the spirit: vid. Apol. Conf. Bern. p. 128 ; Lim- 
 borch, Thcol. christ. v. 12. 2 seqq.
 
 110 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 V. QUAKER AND MENNONITE. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. iv. : This evil and corrupt seed is not 
 imputed to infants, until they actually join with it. ... 
 Those who are under a physical impossibility of either hearing, 
 knowing, or understanding any law, where the impossibility 
 is not brought upon them by any act of their own, but is 
 according to the very order of nature appointed by God, to 
 such there is no law. Moreover, the Quakers reject the ex- 
 pression original sin as unbiblical. 
 
 His, Confess, art. 4 : Primus homo in peccata lapsus . . . 
 et a deo per consolatoria promissa iterum erectus et ad vitam 
 aet. admissus est simul cum omnibus illis, qui lapsi erant, 
 eousque ut nemo posterorum ipsius respectu hujus restitutionis 
 aut peccati aut culpce reus nascatur. 
 
 Schyn, Plen. deduct, p. 229: Quoted from the Franken- 
 thal Protocol: fatetur, omne id, quod in peccato Adami ad 
 let. condemnationem facit, in Christo ademtum esse, quare 
 infantes quoad reatum set. damnationis per Christi obedientiam 
 absolvantur, et absolute negat, peccatum originale in infantib. 
 esse ad mortem set. vel ipsos adhuc esse filios irse natura* 
 reosque set. mortis. (Condemnation rests upon man only 
 through the peccata actualia which spring from the con- 
 cupiscentia carnis.) 
 
 III. THIED POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 Man, being born with moral inability, does also, during his 
 life which lies under the imputation of sin, go on increasing 
 the evil of his nature by actual transgression. No man doeth 
 what is well-pleasing to God, so that he may be justified before 
 God. In this all communions agree, and therefore hold in 
 common that the divine help of grace through Christ is 
 indispensable. But the Eomanists, Greeks, Socinians, and 
 Arminians believe that not everything the natural man does 
 is simply sin in the sight of God ; while the Lutherans and 
 Calvinists teach that nothing but sin can proceed from the
 
 EESULTS OF THE FALL. Ill 
 
 total corruption of the natural man in spiritual things, and 
 that the natural man has free-will only in rebus civilibus. [The 
 Form. Cone. (p. 675), however, makes the express reservation 
 that this holds good only of the unbaptized, not of baptized 
 Christians.] 
 
 I. KOMAN, GKEEK, ETC. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 6, can. 7 : Si quis dixerit, opera omnia, 
 quse ante justificationem fiunt, quacunque ratione facta sint, 
 vere esse peccata vel odium dei mereri, aut, quanto vehemen- 
 tius quis nititur se disponere gratiam, tanto eum gravius pec- 
 care, anath. sit. 
 
 Cf. Mohler, Symbol. 7 ; espec. Bellarmini De gratia, lib. 5. 
 
 Dosithei Confess, c. 1 4 : OTI Svvarat 6 avOpwiros <pvcrei epyd- 
 t,eadai. TO dyaQbv vTraivtrTerai, fjuev KOL o tcvpios, \eywv /cat, rov<j 
 eOvucovs dyairav roO? dyairuvras avTou?, 8i8d<r/ceTai Se KOI 
 viro TOV Hav\ov (Eom. ii. 14), e &v fyavepov /cal rovro, OTI 
 Srj\aSrj dfivvarou, on o 'jroirjcrei o av0pa>7ro$ dyaObv d/J,aprlav 
 elvcu' TO <yap Kdkov dSvvarov KCLKQV elvai <yivo/jievov pivTOi (frvcrei, 
 teal ^TV^KOV, ov%l Se /cat TrvevpariKov Troielv rbv perep- 
 v, oil (rvfi/3d\\Tai Trpo? trtonjpiav avrXw? avev 7r/<7Te&)5 
 
 F. Socin. Opp. ii. p. 463 b: Quilibet homo, ubi ad earn 
 setatem pervenerit, ut rationis usum habeat, si nulla mala 
 institutione aut usu corruptus fuerit, posset si plane id vellet, 
 nullum ex iis peccatis committere, quse cum ipsa" ratione pug- 
 nant, eique per se omnino adversantur ; sed ut ea peccata vitare 
 possit,quse ipsi rationi per se non omnino adversantur,necesse est 
 prseterea, ut sibi persuadeat ac speret, si ilia vitaverit, se ingens 
 aliquod inde bonum consecuturum. Propterea deus prseceptis 
 suis, quae per Chr. dedit, . . . addidit vitae aeternae promissum cet. 
 
 Limborch, Theol, christ. iv. 11. 11: Quodsi quidem gratia 
 communi (d. i. ea, quam deus per opera creationis ac providentise 
 omnibus hominibus communicat) recte utantur et pro virium 
 sibi per illam concessarum modulo honestati naturali operam 
 dent, illos etiam pro ratione status, in quo degunt, deo gratos 
 esse credimus neque a salute prorsus exclusos, saltern igni 
 infernali non acljudicandos.
 
 112 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 II. LUTHERAN. 
 
 A. C. p. 15 : Humana voluntas habet aliquam libertatem 
 ad efficiendam civilem justitiam et deligendas res ration! sub- 
 jectas. Sed non habet vim sine Spiritu sancto efficiendte 
 justitiae dei seu justitiae spiritualis, quia animalis homo non 
 percipit ea, quae sunt Spiritus dei (1 Cor. ii. 14) ; sed haec fit 
 in cordibus, cum per verbum Spiritus sanctus concipitur. Haec 
 totidem verbis dicit Augustinus lib. 3. Hypognosticon : esse 
 fatemur liberum arbitrium omnibus hominibus, habens quidem 
 judicium rationis, non per quod sit idoneum in iis, quae ad 
 deum pertinent, sine deo aut inchoare aut certe peragere : sed 
 tantum in operibus vitae praesentis tam bonis, quam etiam 
 malis. Bonis dico, quae de bono naturae oriuntur, i. e. velle 
 laborare in agro, velle manducare et bibere, velle habere 
 amicum, velle habere indumenta, velle fabricare domum, 
 uxorem velle ducere, pecora nutrire, artem discere diversarum 
 rerum bonarum, vel quicquid bonum ad prsesentem pertinet 
 vitam. Quae omnia non sine divino gubernaculo subsistunt, 
 imo ex ipso et per ipsum sunt et esse coeperunt. Malis vero 
 dico, ut est velle idolum colere, velle homicidium cet. 
 
 F. C. p. 640 : Post lapsum homo haereditario a parenti- 
 bus accipit congenitam pravam vim, internam immunditiem 
 cordis, pravas concupiscentias et pravas inclinationes, ita ut 
 omnes natura talia corda, tales senstis et cogitationes ab Adamo 
 haereditaria et naturali propagatione consequamur, qua? se- 
 cundum summas suas vires et juxta lumen rationis naturaliter 
 e diametro cum deo et summis ipsius mandatis pugnent, atque 
 inimicitia sint adversus deum, praesertim quantum ad res 
 divinas et spirituales attinet. In aliis enim externis et hujus 
 mundi rebus, quae rationi subjectae sunt, relictum est homini 
 adhuc aliquid intellectus, virium et facilitation. 
 
 Ib. p. 657 : Etsi humana ratio seu naturalis intellectus 
 hominis obscuram aliquam notitise illius scintillulam reliquam 
 liabet, quod sit deus, et particulam aliquam legis tenet : tamen 
 adeo ignorans, cceca et perversa est ratio ilia ut etiamsi in- 
 geniosissimi et doctissimi homines in hoc mundo evangelion de 
 filio dei et promissiones divinas de aeterna salute legant vel 
 audiant, tamen ea propriis viribus percipere, intelligere, credere
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 113 
 
 et vera esse statuere nequeant. Quin potius, quanto diligentius 
 in ea re elaborant, ut spirituales res istas suse rationis acumine 
 indagent et comprehendant, tanto minus intelligunt et credunt, 
 et ea omnia pro stultitia et meris migis et fabulis liabent, 
 priusquam a Spiritu sancto illuminentur et doceantur. 
 
 II. p. 661: Sacrse literae hominis non renati cor duro 
 lapidi, qui ad tactum non cedat, sed resistat, idem rudi trunco, 
 interdum etiam feree indomitae comparant, non quod homo post 
 lapsum non amplius sit rationalis creatura, aut quod absque 
 auditu et meditatione verbi divini ad deum convertatur, aut 
 quod in rebus externis et civilibus nihil boni aut mali intelli- 
 gere possit, aut libere aliquid agere vel omittere queat. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 64: Quanquam justitise rationis lubentur tribui- 
 mus suas laudes, nullum enim majus bonum liabet hsec natura 
 
 corrupta . . . tamen non debet cum contumelia Christi laudari 
 
 Falsum est et contumeliosum in Chr., quod non peccent homines 
 facientes prsecepta dei sine gratia". P. 218 : Illud falsum est, non 
 peccare hominem, qui facit opera prseceptorum extra gratiam. 
 
 F. C. p. 7 : Etsi opera ilia, quoe ad conservandam externam 
 disciplinam faciunt (qualia etiam ab infidelibus fiunt . . .) 
 suam coram mundo dignitatem et laudem habent et temporali- 
 bus quibusdam prsemiis in hoc mundo a deo ornantur, attamen, 
 cum non ex vera fide proficiscantur, revera coram deo sunt 
 peccata, h. e. peccatis contaminata et a deo pro peccatis et 
 immunditia reputantur propter naturae hum. corruptionem et 
 quia persona cum deo non est reconciliata. Cf. p. 667. 
 
 [Form. Gone. p. 675 : Quapropter ingens discrimen est inter 
 homines baptizatos et non baptizatos. Cum enim juxta Pauli 
 doctrinam omnes qui baptizati sunt, Christum induerint, et 
 revera sint renati : habent illi jam liberatum arbitrium, hoc 
 est, rursus liberati sunt, ut Christus testatur. Unde etiam non 
 modo verbum Dei audiunt, verum etiam, licet non sine multa 
 infirmitate, eidem assentiri illudque fide amplecti possunt. 
 It is under this aspect that we must view all that the Con- 
 fessions, especially the F. C., say of the " unregenerate."] 
 
 III. EEFORMED. 
 
 Conf. Heh. ii. 9 : Nullum est ad bonum homini arbitrium 
 
 H
 
 114 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 liberum nondum renato, vires nullae ad perficiendum bonum. 
 Terrenarum rerum intelligentia in lapso homine non est nulla. 
 Eeliquit enim deus ex misericordia ingenium, multum tamen 
 distans ab eo, quod inerat ante lapsum. Nemo negat, in 
 externis et regenitos et non regenitos habere liberum arbitrium ; 
 habet enim homo hanc constitutionem cum animantibus aliis 
 communem, ut alia velit, alia nolit. Ita loqui potest aut 
 tacere, domo egredi vel domi manere cet. 
 
 Conf. Gall. 9 : Etsi enim nonnullam habet boni et mali dis- 
 cretionem, affirmamus tamen, quidquid habet lucis, mox fieri 
 tenebras, quum de quserendo deo agitur, adeo ut sua intelli- 
 gentia" et ratione nullo modo possit ad eum accedere ; item, 
 quamvis voluntate sit praeditus, qua ad hoc vel illud movetur, 
 tamen quum ea sit penitus sub peccato captiva, nullam prorsus 
 habet ad bonum appetendum libertatem, nisi quam ex gratia 
 et dei dono acceperit. 
 
 Tliirty-nine Artt. art. xiii. : Works done before the grace of 
 Christ and the inspiration of His Spirit are not pleasant to 
 God ; forasmuch as they spring not of faith in Jesus Christ, 
 neither do they make men meet to receive grace ; yea, rather, 
 for that they are not done as God hath commanded and willed 
 them to be done, we doubt not but that they have the nature 
 of sin. 
 
 Canon. Dordrac. iii. 4. : Eesiduum quidem est post lapsum 
 in homine lumen aliquod naturae, cujus beneficio ille notitias 
 quasdam de deo, de rebus naturalibus, de discrimine honestorum 
 et turpium retinet et aliquod virtutis ac disciplinae externte 
 studium ostendit Sed tanturn abest, ut hoc naturae lumine 
 ad salutarem dei cognitionem pervenire et ad eum se convertere 
 possit, ut ne quidem eo in naturalibus ac civilibus recte utatur, 
 quin imo qualecunque id demum sit, id totum variis modis 
 contaminet atque in injustitia detineat. Quod dum facit, coram 
 deo inexcusabilis redditur. 
 
 Dedar. Thorun. ii. 3. 6. 
 
 IV. QUAKER. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. v. : For we affirm that, as all men par- 
 take of the fruit of Adam's fall, in that, by reason of that evil
 
 RESULTS OF THE FALL. 115 
 
 seed which through him is communicated unto them, they 
 are prone and inclined only to evil, though thousands of 
 thousands be ignorant of Adam's fall, neither ever knew of the 
 eating of the forbidden fruit. . . . This light, seed, etc., ap- 
 pears to be no power or natural faculty of man's mind. This 
 light and seed of God in man he cannot move and stir up 
 when he pleaseth. 
 
 As to the works of the natural man, and their value, see 
 Prop. vii. 1 ; and as to the religious and moral powers of 
 the natural man, see Prop. v. vi. : This most certain doctrine 
 being then received, that there is an evangelical and saving 
 light and grace in all, the universality of the love and mercy 
 of God towards mankind, both on the death of His beloved 
 Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the manifestation of the 
 light in the heart, is established and confirmed against all the 
 objections of such as deny it. ... By whose inward and secret 
 touches they feel themselves turned from the evil to the good, 
 and learn to do to others as they would be done by, in which 
 Christ Himself affirms all to be included.
 
 VI 
 
 PERSON OF CHRIST, AND HIS DIVINITY. 
 
 DIVERGENCE. 
 
 To save mankind from ruin, and to bring men back to Him- 
 self, God sent forth His Son. It is agreed on all sides that 
 Christ is true man ; but, at the same time, in some sense God. 
 The Socinians maintain that Christ, by His nature man, became 
 only in time partaker of divine power and glory, and therefore 
 is not essentially equal with God. The other Christian com- 
 munions, however, ascribe to Christ eternal Deity, and there- 
 fore perfect equality of nature with God the Father. These 
 speak of an incarnation of the Son of God ; the former of an 
 exaltation of the man Jesus, conceived of the Holy Ghost, and 
 consequently begotten as the Son of God, to divine majesty. 
 The latter acknowledge in Christ two distinct but internally 
 united natures ; but the former only one nature, and that the 
 human. 
 
 THE SOCINIAN SYMBOLS. 
 THE HUMAN NATURE OF CHRIST. 
 
 Catech. Racov. p. 45 : Quaenam ea sunt, qua? ad Christi 
 personam referuntur ? Id solum, quod natura sit homo verus, 
 olim quidem, cum in terris viveret, mortalis, nunc vero im- 
 mortalis. P. 46 : (Final Revision) Jesus nullo pacto est 
 purus -et vulgaris homo. Quia licet natura sit homo, nihilo- 
 minus tamen simul est unigenitus dei films idque etiam a primo 
 ortu. Etenim conceptus e Spiritus s. et e virgine, sine ullo 
 
 116
 
 PERSON OF CHRIST, AND HIS DIVINITY. 117 
 
 viri congressu natus, nullum alium patrem hactenus praeter 
 deum habuit. 
 
 F. Socin. Breviss. List. p. 654 a: De Christ! essentia ita statuo, 
 ilium esse hominem in virginis utero et sic sine viri ope divini 
 spiritus vi conceptum ac formatum indeque genitum, primum 
 quidem patibilem et mortalem, donee scilicet inunus sibi a deo 
 demandatum in terris obivit, deinde vero, postquam in coeluni 
 ascendit, impatibilem et immortalem factum. 
 
 Ostorodt, Unterr. c. 6, p. 48 : We therefore hold that the 
 essence or the nature of the Son of God is no other than man's, 
 essence : He was true man, and we know no other nature in 
 Him. But we acknowledge this also, that He had a beginning 
 different from that of other men ; that is, that He received 
 His origin and existence not from a man, but from God Him- 
 self ; since the Virgin Mary conceived Him of the Holy Ghost, 
 that is, by the power of God, for which reason He was to be 
 called the Son of God. He is therefore God's Son, yea, His 
 only-begotten Son, from the beginning of His existence. God 
 never had another son like Him, who by His own power alone 
 was conceived in His mother's womb and born : yea, he was 
 the natural Son of God for the same reason, since he was not 
 adopted, and had never been the son of another before, but 
 always and only and from the beginning the Son of God. 
 
 On the Deity of Christ, see the Socinian propositions above- 
 (No. ii.) ; and, against the incarnation, comp. Cat. Racov. qu. 
 144-156. 
 
 Since the Socinians deny the eternal Godhead of the Ee- 
 deemer, they cannot admit that He had naturally the knowledge 
 of the counsels of God for human salvation. Hence they assume- 
 that Christ was caught up into heaven before His appearance in 
 His mission ; and that thus He received immediately from God 
 the doctrines of the new economy which He was to unfold to 
 the world. 
 
 Cat. Rac. p. 146 : Qua ratione ipse Jesus ad ipsius divinae 
 voluntatis notitiam pervenit ? E& ratione, quod in crelum 
 ascenderit ibique patrem suum et earn, quam nobis annuncia- 
 vit, vitam et beatitatem viderit, et ea omnia, quas docere debe- 
 ret, ab eodem patre audierit : a quo deinde e coelo in terrain 
 demissus, Spir. s. immens& copia perfusus fuit, cujus afflatu
 
 118 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 cuncta, quae a patre didicit, prolocutus est. (John iii. 13, vi 46, 
 viii. 26, cet.) 
 
 Observations. 
 
 It is not necessary to adduce testimonies from the several symbols 
 of the communions on a subject which is perfectly clear. Romanists, 
 Greeks, and Protestants agree in accepting on this matter the Three 
 Creeds. Cf. Cat. Rom. i. 3, viii. 4, 5 ; Gen. Conf. 23 ; Conf. orth. 
 66 ; Metr. Critop. c. 1 ; Conf. Helv. ii. 11 ; Gall. 14 ; Thirty-nine Artt. 
 ii. ; Belg. 19 ; Conf. Aug. p. 10 ; Apol p. 50 ; A. Sm. p. 303 ; Cat. 
 maj. 493 ; F. C. art. viii. ; Conf. Bern. viii. 3 ; Ris, Conf. 8. 
 
 THE RELATION OF THE TWO NATURES. 
 
 A subordinate controversy has been raised as to the mutual 
 relation of the two natures in Christ. It had its origin in the 
 sacramental contention between Luther and Zwingli. Luther 
 and the Lutheran Church affirmed that the communio natu- 
 rarum in the unio personalis, which is matter of Christian faith 
 involves a real mutual communicatio idiomatum, or interchange 
 of properties, so that the divine nature imparts to the human 
 its attributes, that is, omnipotence, omnipresence, and omni- 
 science : whence, of course, it follows that the body of Christ 
 may be everywhere present in the Eucharist. 1 But Zwingli, 
 and with him the Eeformed Church, maintained that such a 
 real communication was a thing impossible, and therefore denied 
 it : the scriptural phrases on which the doctrine is supposed to 
 depend he treated as merely figures of speech. The Roman 
 Catholic Church, as such, took no part in the controversy : only 
 a few of her polemical divines have expressly declared against 
 the communicatio idiomatum. Bellarm. de Christo, iii. 1 seq. ; 
 Becan. Man. Cont. ii 1 ; Klee, Kaih. Dog. i. 435. 
 
 I. LUTHERAN. 
 F. C. p. 767 : Postquam Ch. non communi ratione, ut alius 
 
 1 The main points in this controversy revolve around the first of the three 
 kinds of communicatio laid down by theologians, the genus majestatlcum (cf. 
 Conf. Helv. ii. 11). How far the other two were affected, see Schubert, Theol. 
 Pol. iii. 157.
 
 PERSON OF CHRIST, AND HIS DIVINITY 119 
 
 quispiam sanctus in ccelos ascendit, sed, ut apostojas (Eph. iv. 
 1 0) testatur, super omnes ccelos ascendit, et revera omnia implet 
 et ubique non tantum ut deus, verum etiam ut homo, praesens 
 dominatur et regnat a mari ad mare, et usque ad tenninos 
 terrse, quemadmodum olim prophetae de ipso sunt vaticinati, et 
 apostoli (Mrc. xvi. 20) testantur, quod Christus ipsis ubique 
 co-operatus sit, et sermonem ipsorum sequentibus signis confir- 
 maverit. Hsec autem non terreno modo, sed, ut D. Lutherus 
 loqui solet, pro modo et ratione dexterae dei facta sunt, quae 
 non est certus aliquis et circumscriptus in ccelo locus (ut 
 Sacramentarii sine testimonio sacrae scriptures fingunt), sed 
 nihil aliud est, nisi omnipotens dei virtus, quse ccelum et ter- 
 ram implet, in cujus possessionem Christus, juxta humanitatem 
 suam, sine confusione tamen et exaequatione naturarum, et in 
 essentia", et in essentialibus proprietatibus, realiter seu revera 
 .venit. Ex hac communicata sibi divina virtute homo Christus, 
 juxta verba Testamenti sui, corpore et sanguine suo in sacra 
 ccena", ad quam nos verbo suo ablegat, prsesens esse potest et 
 revera est. 
 
 Il>. p. 768 : Ex hoc fundamento, cujus jam facta est mentio, 
 et quod unio personalis docet, quomodo videlicet divina et hu- 
 mana natura in persona Christi sint unitae, ut non modo nomina 
 communia, sed realiter etiam et re ipsa inter se, sine omni 
 confusione et exsequatione essentiarum, communicent, proma- 
 nat etiam doctrina ilia de communicatione idiomatum duarum 
 in Christo naturarum. 
 
 II. p. 773 : Quantum ad divinam in Christo naturam atti- 
 net, cum in ipso nulla sit transmutatio, divinae Christi naturae 
 per incarnationem nihil (quoad essentiam et proprietates ejus) 
 vel accessit vel decessit, et per earn in se vel per se neque 
 diminuta neque aucta est. . . . Quod ad humanam naturam in 
 persona Christi attinet, non defuerunt quidam, qui contenderent, 
 earn in personal! etiam cum divinitate unione nihil amplius 
 habere, quam duntaxat suas naturales essentiales proprietates, 
 quarum ratione fratribus suis per ornnia similis est. Unde 
 affirmarunt, humanae in Christo naturae nihil eorurn tribui vel 
 debere vel posse, quod sit supra vel contra naturales ipsius 
 proprietates, etiamsi scripturae testimonia humanae Christi na- 
 turae talia tribuant. Hanc vero ipsorum opinionem falsam esse,
 
 120 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 verbo del adeo perspicue demonstrari potest, ut etiam ipsorum 
 consortes eum ipsum errorem reprehendere et rejicere tandeni 
 coeperint. Sacras enim literae et orthodox! patres scriptune 
 verbis edocti preeclare testantur, quod humana natura in Christo 
 earn ob causam et inde adeo, quod cum divina natura perso- 
 naliter unita est, (deposito servili statu et humiliations, jam 
 glorificata et ad dexteram majestatis et virtutis divinse exaltata) 
 prseter et supra naturales, essentiales atque in ipsa permanentes 
 humanas proprietates, etiam singulares, excellentissimas, maxi- 
 mas, supernaturales, impervestigabiles, ineffabiles atque creles- 
 tes prserogativas majestatis, glorias, virtutis ac potentiae super 
 omne, quod nominatur, non solum in hoc seculo, sed etiam in 
 futuro, acceperit, ut ita humana in Christo natura (suo modo et 
 ratione) in exsequendo officio Christi simul adhibeatur, co-ope- 
 retur et suam efficaciam, id est virtutem et operationem habeat, 
 non tantum ex suis naturalibus proprietatibus aut secundum 
 essentiales proprietates aut quousque earum virtus et efficacia 
 progreditur, sed praecipue secundum majestatem, gloriam, vir- 
 tutem atque potentiam, quam per unionem hypostaticam, glori- 
 ficationem et exaltationem accepit. 
 
 Ib. p. 778 : His vocabulis (realis communicatio, realiter 
 communicari) nunquam ullam physicam communicationem vel 
 essentialem trausfusionem (qua naturae in suis essentiis aut 
 essentialibus proprietatibus confunderentur) docere voluimns, 
 ut quidam vocabula et phrases illas astute et malitiose falsa 
 interpretatione, contra conscientiam suam, pervertere non dubi- 
 tarunt, tantum ut piam doctrinam suspicionibus iniquissimis 
 gravarent : sed vocabula et phrases illas verbali communication! 
 opposuimus, cum quidam fingerent, communicationem idioma- 
 tum nihil aliud, nisi phrasin et modum quendam loquendi, hoc 
 est mera tantum verba, nomina et titulos inanes esse ; et hanc 
 verbalem communicationem adeo urserunt, ut de nulla alift 
 communicatione audire quidquam vellent. Quapropter ad recte 
 declarandam majestatem Christi vocabula (de reali communi- 
 catione) usurpavimus, ut significaremus, communicationem 
 illam vere et reipsS, (sine onmi tamen naturarum et proprie- 
 tatum essentialium confusione) factam esse. 
 
 Ib. 779 : Quare testimonia ilia sacrae scripturse, quse de eft 
 majestate loquuntur, ad quam humana in Christo natura exaltata
 
 PEESON OF CHRIST, AND HIS DIVINITY. 121 
 
 est, non in earn sententiam accipimus, quod divina ilia ma- 
 jestas (quae divinae naturae filii dei propria est) in persona 
 filii hominis tantum secundum divinam naturam Christo sit 
 adscribenda aut quod majestas ilia tantum ea ratione sit in 
 humana" Christi natura nudum tantum titulum et nomen 
 solum divinae illius majestatis, per phrasin et modum lo- 
 quendi, revera autem nullam prorsus cum ea communicationem 
 liabeat 
 
 Ib. p. 780 : Credimus, docemus et confitemur, non fieri 
 talem majestatis dei et omnium proprietatum ejus effusionein 
 in humanam naturam Christi, qua divinae naturae aliquid dece- 
 dat, aut ut de suo alii ita largiatur aliquid, quod hac ratione 
 sibi ipsa non in se retineat aut quod humana natura in sub- 
 stantia atque essentia sua parem majestatem acceperit, quae a 
 natura et essentia divinae naturae sit separata et divisa, quasi 
 cum vinum, aqua aut oleum de uno vase in aliud transfunditur. 
 Neque enim vel humana in Christo natura vel ulla alia creatura 
 in coelo aut in terra eo modo omnipotentiae divinae capax est, 
 ut per se omnipotens essentia et natura fiat aut omnipotentes 
 proprietates in se et per se habeat. Hac enim ratione humana 
 natura in Christo abnegaretur et in divinitatem prorsus trans- 
 mutaretur. 
 
 II. EEFORMED. 
 
 Wahr. Bek. der Diencr dcr Kirclie, zu Zurch. 1545 : The true 
 human body of Christ has not been, since the ascension, with 
 His rational human soul deified, that is, changed into God, but 
 has only been glorified. By that glorification, however, the 
 nature of the human body has not been abolished ; its in- 
 firmities have been removed, and that body has been made 
 glorious, illustrious, and immortal. Since the ascension Christ 
 has been no longer corporeally upon earth ; for, according to 
 the attributes of His real human body, He can be only in one 
 place, and not everywhere present. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. 1 1 : Non docemus, veritatem corporis Christi 
 a clarificatione desiisse aut deificatam adeoque sic deificatarn 
 esse, ut suas proprietates, quoad corpus et animam, deposuerit 
 ac prorsus in naturam divinam abierit unaque duntaxat sub- 
 stantia esse cceperit.
 
 122 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Conf. Gall. 15 : Credimus, in unll eademque persona, qute 
 est Jesus Christus, vere et inseparabiliter duas illas naturas 
 sic esse conjunctas, ut etiam sint unitae, manente tamen una- 
 quaque illarum naturarum in sua distincta proprietate, ita ut, 
 quemadmodum in ista conjunctione, divina verbi natura pro- 
 prietates suas retinens mansit increata, infinita. et omnia re- 
 plens, sic etiam natura humana manserit mansuraque sit in 
 aeternum finita, suam illam naturalem formam, dimensionem 
 atque adeo proprietatem habens, cui nimirum veritatem hu- 
 manae naturae non ademerit resurrectio et glorificatio sive 
 assumtio ad dexteram patris. 
 
 Conf. Angl. p. 89 sq. ... (Credimus) quamvis majestas et 
 divinitas Christi ubique diffusa sit, tamen corpus ejus . . . 
 in uno loco esse oportere : Christum corpori suo majestatem 
 dedisse, naturam tamen corporis non ademisse : neque ita asse- 
 rendum esse Christum deum, ut etim negemus esse hominem. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 19 : Sed duae naturae in unam personam 
 unitae, quarum utraque proprietates suas distinctas retineat, 
 adeo ut sicut natura divina semper increata permansit absque 
 initio dierum et vitae fine, ccelum et terrain implens, sic humana 
 natura proprietates suas non amiserit, sed creatura remanserit, 
 initium dierum et naturam finitam habens, omniaque ilia, quae 
 vero corpori conveniunt, retinens. Et quamvis eidem naturae 
 immortalitatem resurrectione sua dederit, nihilominus veritatem 
 ejus non commutavit, si quidem . . . resurrectio nostra etiarn 
 a veritate ejus corporis dependet. 
 
 The Admonitio de lib. Concordice, which was issued, 1581, 
 from Neustadt, states the point of controversy thus : Naturis sin- 
 gulis in persona Ch. realiter communicari proprietates essentiales 
 alterius naturae, negamus et pernegamus cum scriptural et uni- 
 versal orthodoxa ecclesia. Personae autem Ch. utriusque naturae 
 nomina, proprietates et operationes omnes communicari realis- 
 sime, cum iisdem asserimus . . . contra nostros adversarios, qui 
 aliqua deo humana et homini aliqua divina tribuentes confun- 
 dunt naturas, et aliqua adimentes personam Ch. dissolvunt. 
 Etenim personae, quia realiter utramque naturam in sua sub- 
 stantia complectitur, realiter et verissime competit, quidquid 
 sive utriusque sive alterutrius est naturae, propter naturarum 
 unionem. At naturae imi nequaquam est commune, quod alte-
 
 PERSON OF CHRIST, AND HIS DIVINITY. 123 
 
 rius est proprium propter naturarum essentiale et seternum 
 discrimen. Hoc est illud, quod dicitur . . . permutari prsedi- 
 cata s. attributa Ch. de subjectis concretis tantum, non autem 
 de abstractis. . . . Non est igitur qusestio, an deo, sed an 
 deitati realiter humana competant, neque an homini, sed an 
 humanitati realiter divina competant. Illud enim confitemur, 
 hoc negamus. 
 
 Conf. Brand. 4 : They confess that they, in the article of 
 the Person of Christ, heartily believe that in Christ there are 
 two inseparable natures, the divine and the human, so person- 
 ally united and conjoined, that they cannot be and never will 
 be separated. Each nature we hold to retain its natural pro- 
 perties even after this personal union, while at the same time 
 there is a true communion and fellowship. We believe that 
 Christ is with us, and abides with us to the end of the world, 
 according to His infinite nature, that is, according to His 
 divine majesty, but not according to that nature in which He 
 ascended to heaven, and in which He will come again from 
 heaven, which cannot, even in its highest glory, be everywhere 
 present without the abolition of its own attributes. "We 
 believe also that the Lord Christ has been in His assumed 
 humanity enriched and crowned with high and supernatural 
 gifts, as in Ps. viii. ; yet that the human nature has not been 
 transformed into deity, nor made like unto God, which is 
 the Eutychian error. 
 
 (Zwinglii Exegesis eucharistice negotii (Opp. iii. p. 525) : 
 Est aAXotWt?, quantum hue attinet, desultus vel transitus ille 
 aut si mavis permutatio, qua de altera in Chr. natura loquentes 
 alterius vocibus utimur. Ut cum Ch. ait : caro mea vere est 
 cibus, caro proprie est humanse in illo naturae, attamen per 
 commutationem h. 1. pro divina ponitur natura. Qua ratione 
 enim filius dei est, e& ratione est animae cibus. . . . Eursus 
 cum perhibet filium familias a colonis trucidandum, cum filius 
 familias divinitatis ejus nomen sit, pro humana tamen natura 
 accipit, secundum enim istam mori potuit, secundum divinam 
 minime. Cum, inquam, de alter& natura praedicatur, quoad 
 alteriiis, id tandem est allceosis aut idiomatum communicatio 
 aut commutatio.) 
 
 Cf. Conf. Czengcr. art. 8; Colloq. Lips. p. 33; Conf.
 
 124 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Anhalt. art. 8 ; and the appended Ass. CatJi. de mysterio 
 incarnationis cet. ; also Calvin, Tnstitut. iv. 1 7. 3 ; Heideg- 
 ger, Corp. theol. xvii. 46 sqq. ; Wyttenbach, Theol. dogrn. ii 
 p. 708 sqq. 
 
 [The passages by which the fathers of the Lutheran Church 
 thought themselves bound to defend and teach the real im- 
 partation of the properties of the divine nature to the 
 human in the personal union, are especially Col. ii. 9, John 
 VL 53 seq., John v. 27, Matt, xxviii 18, PhiL ii. 9, 10, 
 John i. 14.] 
 
 III. QUAKER. 
 
 With respect to the Somatic or corporeity in Christ, there 
 are two singular opinions of the Quakers and the Anabaptist 
 Mennonites which must be adduced. The former ascribe 
 to Christ a double body; that is, besides the earthly and 
 visible body with which He was clothed in the womb of 
 the Virgin, He had a heavenly and spiritual body, by 
 means of which He has from the beginning communicated 
 Himself to men, and effects continuously the union of the 
 enlightened with God. The Anabaptists and older Men- 
 nonites did not regard the human body of Christ as having 
 been begotten in the womb of the Virgin, but as created 
 by the Holy Ghost, thus removing every possibility of original 
 sin in Christ. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. xiii. 2 : The body, then, of Christ which 
 believers partake of is spiritual, and not carnal ; and His 
 blood which they drink of is pure and heavenly, and not 
 human or elementary. . .. If it be asked, "What that body, 
 what that flesh and blood is ? I answer, It is that heavenly 
 seed, that divine, spiritual, celestial substance, that spiritual 
 body of Christ, whereby and through which He communicatetli 
 life to men, and salvation to as many as believe in Him and 
 receive Him, and whereby also man comes to have fellowship 
 and communion with God. This is proved' from the sixth 
 chapter of John, from ver. 32 to the end, where Christ speaks 
 more at large of this matter than in any other place. . '. . 
 From this large description of the origin, nature, and effects of
 
 PERSON OF CHRIST, AND HIS DIVINITY. 125 
 
 this body, flesh and blood of Christ, it is apparent that it is 
 spiritual, and to be understood of a spiritual body or temple 
 of Jesus Christ, which was born of the Virgin Mary, and in 
 which He walked, lived, and suffered in the laud of Judaea, 
 because it is said that it came down from heaven, yea, that it 
 is He that came down from heaven. Now all Christians at 
 present generally acknowledge that the outward body of Christ 
 came not down from heaven ; neither was it that part of 
 Christ which came down from heaven ; and, to put the matter 
 out of doubt, when the carnal Jews would have been so 
 understanding it, He tells them plainly, ver. 6 3, It is the spirit 
 that quickeneth, the flesh profiteth nothing. ... So, then, as 
 there was the outward visible body and temple of Jesus Christ, 
 which took its origin from the Virgin Mary, there is also the 
 spiritual body of Christ, by and through which He that was the 
 Word in the beginning luith God, and was and is God, did reveal 
 Himself to the sons of men in all ages, and whereby men in all 
 ages come to be made partakers of eternal life, and to have 
 communion and fellowship with God and Christ. Now, as the 
 outward body and temple was called Christ, so was also His 
 spiritual body no less properly, and that long before that out- 
 ward body was in being. Hence the apostle saith, 1 Cor. x. 
 3, 4, that the fathers did eat the same spiritual meat, and did 
 all drink the same spiritual drink : for they drank of that 
 spiritual rock that followed them, and that rock was Christ. 
 This cannot be understood otherwise than of the spiritual body 
 of Christ ; which spiritual body of Christ, though it was the 
 saving food of the righteous both before the law and under 
 the law, yet under the law it was veiled and shadowed, and 
 covered under divers types, ceremonies, and observations ; yea, 
 and not only so, but it was veiled and hid in some respect 
 under the outward temple and body of Christ, or during the 
 continuance of it ; so that the Jews could not understand 
 Christ's preaching about it while on earth. 
 
 IV. ANABAPTIST. 
 
 For the Anabaptist dogma above referred to (to which the 
 Conf. Bdg. art. 18 refers), see F. C. p. 828. Merino Sim. had
 
 126 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 adopted it ; it was accepted in the Emden Colloquium, and 
 in the Hoorns. Conff. But the other Mennonite Confessions 
 contain nothing on the subject; and a Synod at Strasburg, 
 1555, decreed: Christum suam carnem et sanguinem a Maria" 
 accepisse. Cf. Pr. Mennon. de origine hum. Ch. not. vera 
 sententia, Jena 1753.
 
 VII. 
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 
 
 * 
 
 FIKST POINT OF DIVEKGENCE. 
 
 ALL Christians are agreed that Christ is the supreme Bene- 
 factor of the world in a religious point of view, and that we 
 all, in particular, owe to Him the possibility of return to 
 God, and of obtaining the forgiveness of sins, with that eternal 
 life which is dependent on forgiveness. But difference arises 
 as to the medium through which Christ effected the reconcilia- 
 tion between men and God. The greater number of Christian 
 communities acknowledge this medium to be the substitu- 
 tionary death of Christ, the passion and cross, and regard the 
 reconciliation as a divine act of grace, based immediately upon 
 this meritorious act of Christ. The Socinians deny altogether 
 the procurement of forgiveness through the death of Christ, 
 rejecting the satisfaction of the Eedeemer. They hold the 
 death of Christ to have been merely the powerful seal and 
 confirmation, as of the doctrine of Jesus, so also of the forgiv- 
 ing grace of God, and at the same time as a mighty incite- 
 ment to departure from sin. 1 Christ, on their principles, only 
 mediately redeemed from sin ; His merit consisted mainly in 
 His perfect and efficient announcement of the will and the 
 promises of God. Thus He showed mankind the infallible 
 way of blessedness; and every man who chooses this way, 
 that is, fulfils the commandments of Christ, attains through 
 Him to salvation. 
 
 1 In the Cat. Rac. the death of Christ is significantly included in the munus 
 prophelicum, the prophetic office. 
 
 127
 
 128 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 While, therefore, among all other Christian confessions, the 
 death of Christ is the centre or consummation of all that 
 Christ accomplished and provided for man, the Socinians re- 
 pute that death only as a co-operant element in the merito- 
 rious service of Christ. The former hold that the resurrection 
 was the seal and consummation of the death of Christ as an 
 expiatory death ; but the Socinians regard the death of Jesus 
 mainly as the basis of His resurrection, because without the 
 death there could have been no rising again, without the 
 rising again there could have been no confirmation of the hope 
 of eternal life, and no elevation of Christ to that place of 
 heavenly dignity where He could act efficiently for the salva- 
 tion of His people. The former Christian communions main- 
 tain that the doctrine, and also the example of Christ, were 
 only part of His work, standing in the closest and most neces- 
 sary connection with His atoning death ; but the Socinians 
 unite the two in one, and make this the essential matter in 
 Christ's work, His death being subordinate and ministrant to 
 it. Christianity is to them, in fact, essentially a revelation 
 of the divine will, and Christ a new and more perfect divine 
 lawgiver. 1 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. , 
 I. EOMISH. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 7 : Christus, qui, cum essemus 
 inimici, propter nimiam caritatem, qua dilexit nos, nobis sua 
 sanctissima passione ligno crucis justificationem meruit et pro 
 nobis deo patri satisfecit. Cf. sess. v. 3. 
 
 Cat. Rom. i. 5. 11: Hoc in passione et morte filius dei 
 spectavit, ut omnium tetatum peccata redimeret ac deleret et 
 pro eis patri abunde cumulateque satisfaceret. ii. 5. 63: 
 Prima satisfactio et prsestantissima ilia est, qua pro scelerum 
 
 1 Hence the definition of the Christian religion in Socinus : Religio Christiana 
 est doctrina ccelestis docens veram viam perveniendi ad vitam ajternam. Hsec 
 autem via nihil est aliud quam obedire Deo juxta ea/juae ille nobis prsecepit per 
 Dom. nostr. J. C. A celestial doctrine, that is, teaching the way of life, which 
 way is obedience to the commandments given through Christ.
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 129 
 
 nostrorum ratione, etiamsi deus summo jure nobiscum velit 
 agere, quidquid a nobis debeatur, cumulate persolutum est : hsec 
 vero ejusmodi esse dicitur, quse nobis deum propitiuin et placa- 
 tum reddidit, eamque uni Christo acceptam ferimus, qui in cruce 
 pretio pro peccatis nostris soluto plenissime deo satisfecit. 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 85 sq. : 'O Odvaros TOV XpiaTov, va r\Tov 
 fie Bta^>opci)Tpov TpoTrov, irapa OTTOV rjrov TWV a\\wv o\wv 
 avdp(t)7ra>v, Sia rat? a0op//,ai? Tourat?' rrpwTov &i,a TO (3dpo<$ rcov 
 , Sevrepov Start et9 rbv aravpov airdvw eTr\rjpov 
 ' eavrbv TrpocreveyKas TOJ 6eu> Kal vrarpl et9 a7ro\v- 
 rpcoaiv TOV yevovs T&V dv6po!)7ra>v. '/cet a/co/u et9 TOV aTavpov 
 eTeXeicave TTJV fjiecriTelav dvd^eaov Oeov Kal dvQpwTTwv. (Col. 
 i. 20, ii. 14.) 
 
 Cf. Plato, Catech. S. 95 f. 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 C. A. p. 10 : (Decent, quod films dei sit) vere passus, cru- 
 cifixus, mortuus et sepultus, ut reconciliaret nobis patrem et 
 hostia esset non tantum pro culpa" originis, sed etiam pro 
 omnibus actualibus hominum peccatis. Hid. art. 4 : Peccata 
 remitti propter Christum, qui sua morte pro nostris peccatis 
 satisfecit. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 93 : Christus, quia sine peccato subiit 
 poenam peccati et victima pro nobis factus est, sustulit illud 
 jus legis, ne accuset, ne damnet hoc, qui credunt in ipsum, 
 quia ipse est propitiatio pro eis, propter quam nunc justi re- 
 putantnr. 
 
 Catech. maj. p. 495 : Dominus ad haec passus, mortuus et 
 sepultus, ut pro me satisfaceret meamque culpam, quse mihi 
 luenda fuerat, persolveret, non auro neque argento, sed proprio 
 et pretioso suo sanguine. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 15 : Christus peccata mundi in se re- 
 cepit et sustulit divinseque justitise satisfecit. Deus ergo 
 propter solum Christum passum et resuscitatum propitius est 
 peccatis nostris nee ilia nobis imputat. 
 
 I
 
 130 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Conf. Gall art. 1 7 : Credimus, eo iinico sacrificio, quod J. 
 C. in cruce obtulit, nos esse deo reconciliatos. . . . Testamur, 
 Christum esse integram et perfectam nostram ablutionem, in 
 cujus morte plenam satisfactionem nanciscimur cet. 
 
 Conf. Bdg. art. 21 : Credimus, J. C. summum ilium sacer- 
 dotem esse, . . . qui se nostro nomine coram patre stitit ad 
 iram ipsius plena satisfactione SU& placandum, offerens se 
 ipsum in ligno crucis pretiosumque sanguinem suum ad pur- 
 gationem peccatorum nostrorum effundens. Cat. Heidelb. 
 3740 ; Calvin, Instit. ii. 14. 5 ; comp. Conf. Remonstr. viiL 
 7,9. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. viii. sec. 5 : The Lord Jesus, by His perfect 
 obedience and sacrifice of Himself, which He through the 
 Eternal Spirit once offered up unto God, hath fully satisfied 
 the justice of His Father, and purchased not only reconcilia- 
 tion, but an everlasting inheritance in the kingdom of heaven, 
 for all those whom the Father hath given unto Him. Sec. 6 : 
 Although the work of redemption was not actually wrought 
 by Christ till after His incarnation, yet the virtue, efficacy, 
 and benefits thereof were communicated unto the elect in all 
 ages successively from the beginning of the world, in and by 
 those promises, types, and sacrifices wherein He was revealed 
 and signified to be the Seed of the woman which should bruise 
 the serpent's head, and the Lamb slain from the beginning of 
 the world, being yesterday and to-day the same, and for ever. 
 
 The Sinlessness and Obedience of Christ. 
 
 The life of Jesus, as preceding His death, is introduced by the 
 older Protestant symbols, only so far as it involves the perfect sin- 
 lessness of Christ: Apol. p. 93; Eng. Artt. 15; Conf. Gall. 14. The 
 perfect goodness of Christ fitted Him, as man, to be the effectual 
 atonement for all, since for Himself He had not to suffer death. 
 The sinless obedience was the necessary antecedent of the atonement. 
 On the other hand, the Form. Cone, describes the sinless life of 
 Jesus, referred to the divine law, as the perfect fulfilment of that law 
 by Christ in the stead of men; consequently as itself an act of 
 satisfaction the oledientia activa. On the Reformed side this is given 
 in the form of a hint, Helv. ii. 11, Cat. Heid. 36 ; and as an express 
 and plain affinnatioa. in Form. Cons. Helv. c. xv. (against Piscator).
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 131 
 
 SYMBOLS. 
 
 F. C. p. 684: Justitia ilia, quse coram deo fidei aut cre- 
 dentibus ex merS, gratia imputatur, est obedientia, passio et 
 resurrectio Ch., quibus ille legi nostr& caus& satisfecit et pec- 
 cata nostra expiavit. Cum enim Ch. non tantmn homo, 
 verum deus et homo sit, in una person^ indivisa, tam non 
 fuit legi subjectus, quam non fuit passioni et morti (ratione 
 suse personse) obnoxius, quia dominus legis fuit. Earn ob 
 causam ipsius obedientia non ea tantum, qu& patri paruit in 
 tota sua passione et morte, verum etiam, qu& nostra causa 
 sponte sese legi subjecit eamque obedientia ilia su& implevit, 
 nobis ad justitiam imputatur, ita ut deus propter totam obedi- 
 entiam, quam Christus agendo et patiendo in vit& et morte su& 
 nostra causa patri suo ccelesti prsestitit, peccata nobis remittat, 
 pro bonis et justis nos reputet et salute seternEl donet. . . 
 P. 697 : Fides nostra respicit in personam Christi, quatenus 
 ilia pro nobis legi sese subjecit, peccata nostra pertulit et cum 
 ad patrem suum iret, solidam, absolutam et perfectissimam 
 obedientiam jam inde a nativitate sua sanctissima usque ad 
 mortem patri suo ccelesti pro nobis miserrimis peccatoribus 
 prsestitit. 
 
 Form. Consens. Helv. c. 15: Ita Chr. vice electorum obe- 
 dientia mortis suse deo patri satisfecit, ut in censum tamen 
 vicarise justitise et obedientise illius universa ejus, quam per 
 totius vitas suse curriculum legi . . . sive agendo sive patieudo 
 prsestitit, obedientia vocari debeat. Rotundo asserit ore 
 spiritus dei, Christum sanctissima vita legi et justitise div. 
 pro nobis satisfecisse et pretium illud, quo emti sumus deo, 
 non in passionibus duntaxat sed tota ejus vita legi conformata 
 collocat. . . .16. Haec cum ita se omnino habeant, haud sane 
 probare possumus oppositam doctrinam illorum, qui . . . jus- 
 titiam Ch. activam et passivam ita partiuntur, ut asserant, 
 activam eum sibi pro sua vindicare, passivam vero demum 
 electis donare et imputare. (Cf. Wyttenbach, TheoL dogm. ii. 
 p. 789 sqq.) 
 
 Against the obedientia activa Christi protested Soc. Prcelect. 
 c. 18; Limborch, Th. ch. iii 21; and many Eomanists. 
 Barclay, Apol. vii. 8, mentions, in passing, the complete obedi-
 
 132 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ence of Christ as, together with His passion and death, be- 
 longing to the atonement. Episcopius abolishes the obed. act. 
 satisfactoria, by asserting that Christ must needs fulfil the 
 divine law for Himsel 
 
 I. PKOTESTANT. 
 
 The older symbols did not touch the question whether 
 Christ was Mediator in one or in both natures ; but the con- 
 troversy between Osiander and Stancarus gave occasion for 
 the decision of the Lutheran Church in the F. C. art. 3, in 
 harmony with the oecumenical doctrine of the inseparable 
 union of the two natures in Christ. 
 
 Form. Cone. art. 3 : Quod Ch. vere sit nostra justitia sed 
 tamen neque secundum solam div. naturam neque sec. solam 
 hum. naturam, sed totus Chr. sec. utranique naturam in sola 
 videlicet obedientil sua, quam patri ad mortem usque absolu- 
 tissimam deus et homo prsestitit eaque nobis peccatoruni 
 omnium remissionem et vitam set. promeruit. Cf. Conf. Belg. 
 art. 19. Against the scholastic assertion that Christ was 
 Mediator only in the human nature (si sermo sit de principio 
 formali, non de ipso supposito), which Bellarmine defended, 
 the symbols do not enter any special protest. 
 
 II. SOCINIAN. 
 
 The prophetic office of Christ consists, according to the Cat. 
 Eac. p. 145, in this, that Christ perfectly manifested, confirmed, 
 and surrounded by sanctions, the will of God otherwise hidden 
 from us. But this will embraces, p. 14 8, the perfect precepts 
 and promises of God; and among the latter life eternal is 
 reputed the greatest, the remission of sins promised freely of 
 the divine grace being included in this. The confirmation of 
 the divine will was given through Christ, in harmony with the 
 divine counsels, among other means by His death. But Christ 
 suffered death for our sins : how and wherefore is declared 
 as follows: Cat. Eac. p. 261 seq. : Ch. pro pecc. n. passus 
 est, primo, ut omnibus peccatoribushacrationejuscertissimum 
 fieret peccatoruni remissionis ipsiusque adeo vitse set., proinde
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 133 
 
 etiam non dubia fides. Secundo, ut omnes peccatores ad Ch. 
 incitarentur et traherentur, in hoc et per hunc solum pecca- 
 torum remissionem quserentes, qui pro iis esset mortuus. 
 Tertio, ut suam hac ratione deus humane generi immensam 
 testaretur caritatem illudque sibi penitus reconciliaret. 
 P. 262 : At qua? ratio erat, quia iisdem afflictionibus et morti 
 ejusmodi credentes sint obnoxii, easdem afflictiones et mortem 
 Christo perferendi ? Duse ejus rei extitere causes, quemadmo- 
 dum etiam duplici ratione Christus nos servat : primum enim, 
 et certam nobis salutis spem facit, et, ut salutis viam turn in- 
 grediamur, turn in ea persistamus, nos movet. Deinde nobis 
 in omni tentationum, laborum, et periculorum certamine adest, 
 opitulatur et tandem ab ipsa seterna morte liberat. P. 265 : 
 (Mors Ch. nobis voluntatem dei confirmavit) duplici ratione, 
 primum quod ab asserenda sua doctrina ne acerbissimS, 
 quidem morte deterreri se passus est, nominatim vero, quod 
 novum fcedus sanguine suo sanxerit; . . . deinde quod 
 per mortem pervenerit ad resurrectionem, ex qua maxima 
 oritur divinas voluntatis confirmatio deque nostra resurrec- 
 tione et vitse seternse adeptione certissima persuasio. P. 
 266 : Expone earn rem fusius, qua ratione resurrectione 
 Christi, atque ad eum modum ipsius morte de resurrectione 
 nostra et vita seterna confirmati simus ? Primum morte et re- 
 surrectione Christi certi sumus facti de nostra resurrectione ad 
 eum modum, quod in exemplo Christi propositum esse nobis 
 spectemus, quod in Christi doctrina promissum est : eos, qui 
 deo obtemperent, e quovis mortis quanturnvis atrocis genere 
 liberari. Deinde, cum Christus ita resurrexit, ut supremam 
 in omnia potestatem fuerit adeptus, omnis de salute nostra 
 dubitandi causa sublata est. 1 P. 267: Hinc igitur per- 
 spicio, plus in resurrectione quam in Christi morte situm esse 
 in nostrse salutis negotio ? Hactenus sane, quatenus mors 
 Christi inutilis et inemcax futura fuisset, nisi earn consecuta 
 fuisset Christi resurrectio (quod tamen decreti divini respectu 
 haud fuit possibile), quse mortem quoque illius mirum in 
 modum animavit et emcacissimam in salutis nostrse negotio 
 effecit. P. 268 sqq. : Nonne etiam ideo Christus est mortuus, 
 
 1 This exaltation of Christ was a reward for obedience shown unto death (Soc. 
 Pr. th. c. 23) ; that is, God had decreed thus to impart His sin-destroying grace.
 
 134 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ut salutem nostram proprie loquendo mereretur et peccatorum 
 nostrorum debita proprie itidem loquendo dissolveret ? Etsi 
 nunc vulgo ita Christian! sentiant, tamen ea sententia turn 
 fallax est et erronea turn admodum perniciosa, siquidem id 
 sibi volunt, Christum aequivalentes pro peccatis nostris poenas 
 persolvisse et obedientiae suse pretio inobedientiam nostram 
 exacte compensasse. ... Id scripturis repugnat ad eum 
 modum, quod scripturae passim deum peccata hominibus 
 gratuito remittere testentur. . . . Ration! repugnat, quod 
 sequeretur, Ch. aeternam mortem subiisse, . . . ut taceamus 
 unam per se mortem, etiamsi tandem seterna fuisset, nedum 
 adeo brevem, innumeris aeternis mortibus aequalem non esse. 
 P. 277 : Quo sensu Ch. pro peccatis nostris seu propter 
 peccata dicitur esse mortuus ? Eodem sensu, quanquam longe 
 pleniore ac perfectiore, quo victimse pro peccatis caedi dicebantur. 
 Nempe . . . Ch., omnis peccati insonti, peccata nostra causa 
 mortis fuerunt, quam ille subiit, ut nos ab eorum omnium 
 reatu solveret et quae mortis illius vis est ; ut ea simul in 
 nobis tolleret et aboleret. Ideo enim Christo pro peccatis nos- 
 tris in mortem se tradidit, us nos sibi assereret ac manciparet, 
 . . . suo livore nos sanavit ; nam tanta sua caritate errantes 
 ad se convertit. P. 284: Quid de reconciliation sentis ? 
 Christum J. nobis, qui propter peccata nostra dei inimici 
 eramus et ab eo abalienati, viam ostendisse, quemadmodum 
 nos ad deum converti atque ad eum modum ei reconciliari 
 oporteat ; et ad id faciendum morte etiam sua, in qua tanta 
 erga nos caritas dei apparuit, nos vehementer impulisse. 
 
 The priestly office of Christ is referred by Socinianism only 
 to His state of exaltation. Cat. Hoc. p. 476 : In eo situm est, 
 quod quemadmodum pro regio munere potest nobis in omnibus 
 nostris necessitatibus subvenire, ita pro mun. sacerdotali sub- 
 venire vult ac porro subvenit atque haec illius subveniendi s. 
 opis afferendae ratio sacrificium ejus appellatur. qu. 477 quod, 
 quemadmodum in V. T. summus pontifex . . . ea, quae ad 
 expianda peccata populi spectarent, perficiebat, ita Ch. nunc 
 penetravit ccelos, ut illic deo appareat pro nobis et omnia ad 
 expiationem peccatorum nostr. spectantia peragat. [Qu. 479 
 indicates How.] Qui expiationem peccatorum nostrorum 
 Jesus in ccelis peragit ? Primum a peccatorum pcenis nos
 
 KEDEMPTION : THE MEKITS OF CHRIST. 135. 
 
 liberat, dum virtute et potestate, quern a patre plenam et 
 absolutam consecutus est, perpetuo nos tuetur et iram del inter- 
 ventu suo quodammodo a nbbis arcet ; deinde ab ipsorum pec- 
 catomm servitute nos liberat, dum eadem potestate ab omni 
 flagitiorum genere nos retrahit et avocat, id vero in sua ipsius 
 persona nobis ostendendo, quid consequatur is, qui a peccando 
 desistit. P. 280 sq. : Apeccatorum poena nos liberavit, cum 
 se ipsum pro nobis, deo sic volente, in mortem tradidit et per 
 sanguinem proprium in coalesti sacrario obtulit, quam filii sui 
 ad mortem, eamque crucis, obedienffiam deus pro omnium 
 gratissima" sibi victima accepit. Neque tamen hoc earn vim 
 habet, quasi deus debita nostra sibi proprie persoluta acceperit, 
 cum Christus illius proprius victimaque ab ipsomet data 
 fuerit, quod et in anniversario illo sacrificio (sacrificii Christi 
 figura) fiebat, et omnia ipse per se suoque nomine deo debuerit, 
 et quamvis omnium maxima ac perfectissima ejus fuerit obe- 
 dientia, nihilominus incomparabiliter majora pro ilia prcemia 
 acceperit; proinde hoc immensse dei gratiae et liberalitati 
 adscribendum est, quod non solum nihil eorum, quae sibi a 
 nobis debebantur, receperit, non solum omnia debita nobis 
 condonaverit, sed etiam victimam de suo eamque filium suum 
 proprium et unigenitum uniceque dilectum, agnum ilium imma- 
 culatum pro nobis peccatisque nostris impendent, non ut sibi 
 quidquam pro nobis persolveret, (ficta enim solutio haec foret, 
 non vera solutio) sed ut nobis tanto majus certiusque jus venise 
 et eeternse vitas faceret, seseque ad earn dandam tanto pignore 
 obstringeret nosque ad se converteret, aliisque ingentibus bonis, 
 de quibus egimus, per mortem filii sui bearet. 
 
 Still more plainly is it declared by Socinus, Prod, theol. 
 c. 24, that with this oblation of Christ in heaven the idea of 
 satisfaction may easily be connected, and that this idea, and 
 all belonging to it, has been taken up out of predilection for 
 the Epistle to the Hebrews. For the explanation of some of 
 the remarks on the Catechism, see c. 28 : A Chr. in ccelis 
 manens non ideo expiat peccata nostra, quod vis atque efficacia 
 expiationis ab ipso in cruce peractse perpetuo duret, sed quia 
 is, ad dei dextram in ccelis collocatus, divinse liberalitatis nos 
 perpetuo admonet ad eamque amplectendam jugiter movet, et 
 summa potestate sibi a deo in ccelo et in terra concessa a
 
 136 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 divina ira, quae de ccelo identidem adversus impios et peccatores 
 exseritur et in die ilia extrema adversus omnes simul cumu- 
 latissime exseretur, nos et servat et servaturus est. 
 
 Socin. Prcelect. iheol. c. 16-29 ; de J. Oh. servatore in dcr 
 liblioth. fratr. Polon. i. ; Ostorodt, Unterricht. c. 37, 40; 
 Summa theol. Unitar. ii. 4. 
 
 III. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers, like the Eomanists and Protestants, speak of 
 the atoning death of Christ, and in scriptural expressions. But 
 they make a double atonement, distinguishing the actual and 
 external, which was accomplished on the cross, and has brought 
 to the sinner the possibility of obtaining salvation, from the 
 internal atonement, through the' communication of the inner 
 power of the light of life flowing from Christ into the soul. 
 Both and together effect the deliverance of man from sin ; the 
 one being as necessary as the other. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. vii 2 : Forasmuch as all men who have come 
 to man's estate (the man Jesus only excepted) have sinned, 
 therefore all have need of this Saviour to remove the wrath of 
 God from them due to their offences. In this respect He is 
 truly said to have borne the iniquities of us all in His body 
 on the tree, and therefore is the only Mediator, having qualified 
 the wrath of God towards us, so that our former sins stand not 
 in our way, being by virtue of His most satisfactory sacrifice 
 removed and pardoned. Neither do we think that remission 
 of sins is to be expected, sought, or obtained any other way, or 
 by any works or sacrifice whatsoever ; though, as has been said 
 formerly, they may come to partake that are ignorant of the 
 history. So, then, Christ by His death and sufferings hath 
 reconciled us to God, even while we are enemies ; that is, He 
 offers reconciliation unto us, we are put into a capacity of 
 being reconciled. . . . We consider then our redemption in a 
 twofold respect or state, both which in their own nature are 
 perfect, though in their application to us the one is not, nor 
 cannot be, without respect to the other. . . . The first is the 
 redemption performed and accomplished by Christ for us in 
 His crucified body without us ; the other is the redemption
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 137 
 
 wrought by Christ in us, which no less properly is called and 
 accounted a redemption than the former. The first, then, is 
 that whereby a man, as he stands in the Fall, is put into a 
 capacity of salvation, and hath conveyed unto him a measure 
 of that power, virtue, spirit, life, and grace that was in Christ 
 Jesus, which, as the free gift of God, is able to counterbalance, 
 overcome, and root out the evil seed wherewith we are natu- 
 rally, as in the Fall, leavened. The second is that whereby 
 we witness and know this pure and perfect redemption in our- 
 selves, purifying, cleansing, and redeeming us from the power 
 of corruption, and bringing us into unity, favour, and friend- 
 ship with God. By the first of these two, we that were lost 
 in Adam, plunged into the bitter and corrupt seed, unable of 
 ourselves to do any good thing, but naturally joined and united 
 to evil, forward and propense to all iniquity, servants and slaves 
 to the power and spirit of darkness, are, notwithstanding all 
 this, so far reconciled to God by the death of His Son, while 
 enemies, that we are put into a capacity of salvation, having 
 the glad tidings of the gospel peace offered unto us ; and God 
 is reconciled unto us in Christ, calls and invites us to Himself. 
 . . . By the second, we witness this capacity brought into act, 
 whereby, receiving and not resisting the purchase of His death, 
 to wit, the light, spirit, and grace of Christ revealed in us, we 
 witness and possess a real, true, and inward redemption from 
 the power and prevalency of sin, and so come to be truly and 
 really redeemed, justified, and made righteous, and to a sensible 
 union and friendship with God. Thus He died for us, that 
 He might redeem us from all iniquity ; and thus we know 
 Him, and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of 
 His sufferings, being made conformable to His death. This 
 last follows the first in order, and is a consequence of it, pro- 
 ceeding from it as an effect from its cause, so as none 
 could have enjoyed the last without the first had been, such 
 being the will of God ; so also can none now partake of the 
 first, but as he witnesseth the last. Wherefore, as to us, they 
 are both causes of our justification ; the first the procuring 
 efficient, the other the formal cause. ... 4. That the obedi- 
 ence, sufferings, and death of Christ is that by which the soul 
 obtains remission of sins, and is the procuring cause of that
 
 138 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 grace, by whose inward workings Christ comes to be formed 
 inwardly, and the soul to be made conformable unto Him, and 
 so just and justified. And that, therefore, in respect of this 
 capacity and offer of grace, God is said to be reconciled ; not 
 as if He were actually reconciled, or did actually justify, or 
 account any just, so long as they remain in their sins really 
 impure and unjust 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 The Confessions which acknowledge a reconciliation of the 
 world through the vicarious death of Christ differ again in 
 this : some hold the atoning death of Christ as perfectly 
 sufficient; others as sufficient in part; and others, again, as 
 more than sufficient. The Lutherans take the first view, that 
 of a perfectly sufficient value : the death of Christ was a 
 ransom-price perfectly proportioned to the guilt and punish- 
 ment of all those whom He should redeem a plenaria satis- 
 factio. The second view, that of a partly sufficient value, is 
 held by various classes : 1. As to its value (intensive), the 
 Arminians so regard it, inasmuch as they assert that the 
 vicarious death of Christ, as His alone, had not in itself the 
 power of expiating the sins of all ; but that the compassion 
 of God reckoned it as perfectly sufficient a disproportionate 
 ransom-price, instead of one exactly proportioned to the de- 
 merit of the sin. 1 2. As to its application, there is again a 
 difference in the second class : a. The Roman Catholics belong 
 to it in a certain sense, as they think that Christ's death has 
 provided a full satisfaction only for the guilt contracted before 
 baptism, while for mortal sins committed after baptism only 
 the guilt and eternal penalty are abolished, the temporal or 
 limited punishments requiring the expiation of Christians 
 themselves ; . The Calvinists, according to whom God applies 
 the merit of Christ only to the elect. In another sense, how- 
 
 1 Our theologians call this Acceptttaiio. Acceptatio, on the other hand, is 
 the acceptance of or satisfaction with the sufficient ransom-price offered to God 
 on the death of Jesus.
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 139 
 
 ever, the Romanists make the third class : they esteem the 
 death of Christ to have a superfluity of merit ; as the suffer- 
 ings of the God-man necessarily bear an infinite value, while 
 the applications of His satisfaction to man must ever be finite. 
 On the application of this superabundant merit, see xvii. 2. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. EOMAN CATHOLIC DECREES. 
 
 As to the satisfaction of Christ which is applied in baptism, 
 see below, xv. 2. Compare Bellarmine, Posnit. iv. 14 : " We 
 acknowledge this difference : In baptism the blood of Christ 
 operates so fully, so perfectly, so abundantly, as- to destroy all 
 sins, not only as to their guilt, but also as to all the penalty 
 of another life, whether eternal or temporal. But in the 
 sacrament of penance, the same blood of Christ destroys in- 
 deed the guilt and the eternal pains, but does not expiate the 
 whole temporal penalty, unless the sinner's own satisfaction 
 co-operates." The necessity of our own expiation springs 
 from the principle, that " it is false and contrary to the word 
 of God to affirm that guilt is never remitted by our Lord 
 without the forgiveness of its universal penalty." Cone. Trid. 
 sess. 14. It is thus admitted, that the Christian who has 
 committed mortal sins receives for Christ's sake forgiveness 
 of his guilt, and remission of the eternal penalty, but that he 
 must himself temporally make expiation for his sins here or 
 in purgatory ; that is, he must either suffer certain temporal 
 punishments inflicted on him by God, or make satisfaction by 
 personal penal visitations on himself. Cone. Trid. sess. 14, 
 can. 13. The satisfying operation, however, of these penances, 
 it must be remembered, rests upon the merit of Christ, and 
 is therefore, according to Eoman Catholic argument, far from 
 dishonouring or obscuring those supreme merits. Trid. sess. 
 14 ; Pcenit. c. 8 ; Cat. Bom. ii. 5. 72 j Bellar. Pan. iv. 7. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 14, de Pan. cap. 8 : Sane et divinse justitiae 
 ratio exigere videtur, ut aliter ab eo in gratiam recipiantur, 
 qui ante baptismum per ignorantiam deliquerint, aliter vero, 
 qui semel a peccati et dsemonis servitute liberati et accepto
 
 140 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Spiritus sancti dono scienter templum del violare non formi- 
 daverint; et divinam clementiam decet, ne ita nobis absqne 
 ulla satisfactione peccata dimittantur, ut occasione accepta 
 peccata leviora putantes in graviora labamur. . . . Accedit, 
 quod dum satisfaciendo patimur pro peccatis, Christo, qui pro 
 peccatis nostris satisfecit, conformes efficimur. . . . Neque 
 vero ita nostra est satisfactio hsec, quam pro peccatis nostris 
 exsolvimus, ut non sit per Christum ; nam qui ex nobis tan- 
 quam ex nobis nihil possumus, eo co-operante omnia possumus. 
 Ita non habet homo unde glorietur, sed omnis gloriatio nostra 
 in Christo est cet. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 5. 6 5 : Docendi sunt, duo esse, quse pecca- 
 tum consequuntur, maculam et prenam. Ac quamvis semper 
 culpa dimissa simul etiam aeternae mortis supplicium ap. in- 
 feros constitution condonetur, tamen non semper contingit, ut 
 dom. peccatorum reliquias et pcenam certo tempore definitam, 
 quae peccatis debetur, remittat. As to penances imposed 
 by the priest, or self-inflicted, see qu. 63, 73 ; as to temporal 
 pains as satisfying, qu. 75. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 14, de pcen. can. 13 : Si quis dixerit, pro 
 peccatis quoad poenam temporalem minime deo per Christi 
 merita satisfied pcenis ab eo inflictis et patienter toleratis vel 
 a sacerdote injunctis, sed neque sponte susceptis . . . , ana- 
 thema sit. Can. 1 5 : Si quis dixerit, . . . fictionem esse, quod, 
 virtute clavium sublata posna aeterna, pcena temporalis plerum- 
 que exsolvenda remaneat, anath. sit. 
 
 Cf. Confut. A. a p. 84 sq. 
 
 II PROTESTANT ANTITHESES FROM THE SYMBOLS. 
 
 ' Apol. A. C.p. 184 : Fatentur adversarii, quod satisfactiones 
 non prosint ad remissionem culpae. Verum fingunt, satisfac- 
 tiones prodesse ad redimendas posnas seu purgatorii seu alias. 
 Sic enim decent, in remissione peccati deum remittere culpam, 
 et tamen, quia convenit justitise divinae punire peccatum, 
 mutare pcenam seternam in po3nam temporalem. Addunt 
 amplius, partem illius temporalis pcenas remitti potestate 
 clavium, reliquum autem redimi per satisfationes. P. 185: Et 
 has satisfactiones dicunt valere, etiamsi fiant ab his, qui
 
 REDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHRIST. 141 
 
 relapsi sunt in peccatum mortale, quasi vero divina offensa 
 placari queat ab his, qui sunt in peccato mortali. Haec 
 tota res est commentitia, recens conficta, sine auctoritate 
 scriptures et veterum scriptorum ecclesiasticorum. Ac ne 
 Longobardus quidem de satisfactionibus hoc niodo loquitur. 
 II. p. 189 : Cum scripturae citatse non dicant, quod operi- 
 bus non debitis pcense seternse compensandae sint, temere 
 affirmant adversarii, quod per satisfactiones canonicas pcense 
 illse compensentur. II. p. 192: Cum mors Christi sit 
 satisfactio pro morte seterna, et cum ipsi adversarii fatean- 
 tur, ilia opera satisfactionum esse opera non debita, sed 
 opera traditionum humanarum, de quibus Christus inquit, 
 quod sint inutiles cultus: tuto possumus affirmare, quod 
 satisfactiones canonicse non sint necessaries jure divino ad re- 
 missionem culpae aut pcense aeternae aut pcenae purgatorii. Sed 
 objiciunt adversarii, vindictam seu pcenam necessariam esse 
 ad pcenitentiam, quia Augustinus ait, poenitentiam esse vin- 
 dictam punientem cet. Concedimus vindictam seu poenam 
 in pcenitentia necessariam esse, non tanquam meritum, sen 
 pretium, sicut adversarii fingunt satisfactiones, sed vindicta 
 formaliter est in pcenitentia, hoc est quia ipsa regeneratio fit 
 perpetua mortificatione vetustatis. Ib. p. 193 : At, inquiunt, 
 convenit justitiae dei, punire peccatum. Certe punit in con- 
 tritione, cum in illis terroribus iram suam ostendit, sicut signi- 
 ficat David, cum orat : (Ps. vi. 2) domine, ne in furore tuo 
 arguas me. Et Jeremias cap. x. (24) : corripe me, domine ; 
 veruntamen in judicio, non in furore, ne ad nihilum redigas 
 me. Hie sane de acerbissimis pcenis loquitur. Et fatentur 
 adversarii contritionem posse tantam esse, ut non requiratur 
 satisfactio. Ib. p. 194: Objiciunt de Adam, de Davide, qui 
 propter adulterium punitus est. Ex his exemplis faciunt 
 universalem regulam, quod singulis peccatis respondeant pro- 
 prise pcense temporales in remissione peccatorum. Prius dictum 
 est, sanctos sustinere pcenas, quae sunt opera dei, sustinent con- 
 tritionem seu terrores, sustinent et alias communes afflictiones, 
 ita sustinent aliqui proprias pcenas a deo impositas, exempli 
 causa. Ib. p. 195: Ubi docet hoc scriptura, non posse nos 
 a morte aeterna liberari, nisi per illam compensationem cer- 
 tarum pcenarum prseter communes afflictiones? At contra
 
 142 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 saepissime docet, remissionem peccatorum gratis contingere 
 propter Christum, Christum esse victorem peccati et mortis : 
 quare non est assuendum meritum satisfactionis. Et quamvis 
 afflictiones reliquae sint, tamen has interpretatur praesentis 
 peccati mortificationes esse, non compensationes seternae mortis 
 seu pretia pro seternEi morte. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 14 : Improbamus illos, qui suis satis- 
 factionibus existimant se pro eommissis satisfacere peccatis. 
 Nam docemus, Christum unum morte vel passione sua esse 
 omnium peccatorum satisfactionem, propitiationem vel expia- 
 tionem. Cf. Conf. Gall. art. 17 u. 24; Conf. Eng. Artt. ; 
 Conf. Belg. art. 23 ; Declar. Thorun. ii 6, pcenit. 3 ; Calvin, 
 Institut. iii. 4. 25 sqq. (and Limborch, TJieol. christ. v. 77. 16). 
 Especially, however, as to the mass in its limitation, of the 
 power of the Eedeemer's cross, s. A. C. p. 25; Apol. p. 265 ; 
 Art. Angl. 31 ; Conf. Angl. p. 97. 
 
 III. ARMEHAN DOCTRINE. 
 
 The Conf. Eem. contains no adequate statement as to the 
 value of the satisfaction of Christ. The specific doctrine of 
 the Arminians was formed after the Synod of Dort, and is 
 found in the writings of the leading Arminians. 
 
 Limborch, Apol. thes. iii. 22. 5 : Quaeri hie posset, quomodo 
 unius hominis victima sufficere possit et revera suffecerit ad 
 tot hominum myriades eorumque peccata innumera expiandum. 
 Eesp. Sufficit ilia duplici respectu. Primo, respectu voluntatis 
 divince, quae ad generis humani liberationem nihil ultra re- 
 quisivit, sed in unicd hoc victima acquievit. . . . Secundo, re- 
 spectu dignitatis personae Jesu Christi. Quamvis enim Jesus 
 non sit passus nisi in humani sua natura, tamen quia ilia in 
 personae unitatem assumta est a natura divina, recte ipse dei 
 filius aeternus tulisse dicitur, quidquid homo Jesus Christus in 
 carne pro peccatoribus sustinuit. Quin et, licet Christus solum- 
 modo consideretur ut homo, excellentia personae ipsius tanta 
 est, ut omnium hominum longissime superet 21. 6: Satis- 
 factio Christi dicitur, qua" pro nobis poenas omnes luit peccatis 
 nostris debitas, casque perferendo et exhauriendo divinae jus- 
 titiae satisfecit. Verum ilia sententia nullum habet in scrip-
 
 EEDEMPTION: THE MERITS OF CHKIST. 143 
 
 tura fundamentum. Mors Ckristi vocatur sacrificium pro 
 peccato ; atqui sacrificia non sunt solutiones debitorum, neque 
 plenarice pro peccatis satisfactioncs ; sed illis peractis concedi- 
 tur gratuita, peccati remissio. Il>. 21. 8 : In eo errant quam 
 maxime, quod velint redemtionis pretium per omnia cequivalens 
 esse debere miseries illi, e qua redemtio fit. Eedemtionis 
 pretium enim constitui solet pro libera sestimatione illius, qui 
 captivum detinet, non autem solvi pro captivi merito. 
 
 Curcellsei Eel. christ. instit. v. 19. 15 sq. : Non ergo, ut 
 vulgo putant, satisfecit Ch. patiendo omnes pcenas, quas pec- 
 catis nostris merueramus ; nam primo istud ad sacrificii ratio- 
 nem non pertinet, sacrificia enim non sunt solutiones debitorum; 
 secundo Ch. non est passus mortem seternam, quse erat pcena 
 peccato debita, nam paucis tantum horis in cruce pependit et 
 tertia die resurrexit. Imo etiamsi mortem eeternam pertulisset, 
 non videtur satisfacere potuisse pro omnibus totius mundi 
 peccatis ; hsec enim fuisset tantum una mors, quse omnibus 
 moribus, quas singuli pro suis peccatis meruerant, non sequi- 
 valuisset. . . . Quarto ista sententia non potest consistere cum 
 ilia remissione gratuita" omnium peccatorum, quam deum nobis 
 in Ch. ex immensa sua misericordia concedere, sacra3 literse 
 passim decent. 
 
 Indulgences. 
 
 As to the superabundant satisfaction of Christ, on which 
 the institute of indulgences rests, the Eomish symbols contain 
 no specific teaching. The Cat. Born, only hints at it, but 
 Bellarmine gives it a full exposition. 
 
 Cat. Bom. i. 5 : Pretium, quod Ch. pro nobis persolvit, 
 debitis nostris non par solum et aequale fuit, verum ea longe 
 superavit. 
 
 Bell. De ind. i. 2 : Exstat in ecclesia* thesaurus satisfac- 
 tionum ex Christi passionibus infinitus, qui nunquam exhauriri 
 poterit. Nam Christi passio pretii fuit infiniti, cum esset 
 passio personse infinites. Deus est, qui sanguinem fudit pro 
 ecclesia. Dignitas autem satisfactionis mensuram accipit a 
 dignitate personaa satisfacientis. Dejinde Christus pro homi- 
 nibus omnibus mortuus est. Certum est autem, non omnibus 
 hominibus, qui hactenus vixerunt, pretium mortis Christi re-
 
 144 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ipsa applicatum fuisse ad eorum expianda peccata, imo majo- 
 rem partem hominum morti aeternoB addictam esse. Superest 
 igitur multum illius pretii, quod semper applicari possit, 
 prsesertim cum tota Christ! satisfactio nobis applicari possit, 
 cum ipse per se nulla satisfactione indiguerit, qui peccatum 
 non fecit, nee facere potuit. C. 4 : Verissime scripsit 
 Clemens vi. in constitut. Unigenitus, unam sanguinis Ch. 
 guttam propter unionem ad verbum toti mundo reconciliando 
 satis esse potuisse. Et cum Ch. non unam sang, guttam, sed 
 totum sanguinem pro nobis fuderit, . . . dubium esse non 
 potest, quin semper supersit pretium, idque justissimum, quo 
 debita nostra solvi possint. Cf. Klee, Dogmat. ii. S. 475, iii. 
 S. 285. 
 
 The Protestant symbols do not enter upon the question, save 
 as they condemn the indulgences based upon the superabun- 
 dant satisfaction.
 
 VIII. 
 
 CONYEKSION AND GKACE. 
 
 ALL Christians agree that the regeneration of man, wherein he 
 is restored to righteousness in Christ and acceptableness to 
 God, takes place under the influence of divine grace and of 
 the Holy Spirit. But, in conformity with their several doc- 
 trines as to the depravity of the natural man, they differ as 
 to the degrees and steps of this influence, and as to the rela- 
 tion it bears to human ability. Some deny to man, as in a 
 state of nature, all ability to begin the work of regeneration : 
 the Eoman Church, the Lutheran and Eeformed Churches, 
 the Arminians, Mennonites, and Quakers. Others maintain 
 the Socinians that man, by means of his natural ability, 
 animated by the promises of God, may begin his own amend- 
 ment ; but that when he has begun it, and become a believer, 
 he receives the seal and special power of the Holy Spirit. 
 The former are divided into two classes, with reference to the 
 development of the renewal, which can be commenced only 
 by the Holy Ghost. The Eomanists, like the Arminians 
 and Mennonites, teach that the Holy Ghost awakens and 
 strengthens the ability slumbering in the natural man, but 
 that man must in free self-decision give himself up to this 
 influence, which indeed he can never acquire by merit, in 
 order that the work of regeneration may be effected through 
 his own power united with the divine. Protestants generally, 
 on the contrary, refer regeneration back entirely to the in- 
 fluence of the Holy Ghost, who restores in the natural man 
 the power of willing. After that restoration, and in the 
 subsequent process of renewal, the regenerate uses this newly- 
 bestowed power only in co-operation. The Quakers, deriving 
 
 I
 
 146 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 all renewal from the divine light kindled in the spirit, are far 
 from speaking of any co-operation of human power with the 
 divine grace. They ascribe to human nature, as spirit, only a 
 capacity for the internal light, and regard it as the foundation 
 for the gracious energy and influence of the Divine Spirit. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. That the, Divine Grace is Indispensable to Conversion. 
 I. ROMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sessio 6, can. 1 : Si quis dixerit, hominem suis 
 operibus, quae vel per legis doctrinam fiant, absque divina per 
 Christum gratia, posse justificari coram deo, anathema sit. 
 Ib. can. 2 : Si quis dixerit, ad hoc solum divinarn gratiam per 
 Christum dari, ut facilius homo juste vivere ac vitam aeternam 
 promereri possit, quasi per liberum arbitrium sine gratia 
 utrumque, sed segre tamen et difficulter, possit, anathema sit. 
 Ib. can. 3 : Si quis dixerit, sine prseveniente Spiritus sancti 
 inspiratione atque ejus adjutorio hominem credere, sperare, 
 diligere aut prenitere posse, sicut oportet, ut ei justificationis 
 gratia conferatur, anathema sit. Cf. also cap. 3. 
 
 (Bellarmini De amiss, grot, vi 16 : Nos libenter admittimus, 
 non posse homines solis viribus naturse corruptae quidquam 
 boni praestare, quod ad pietatem et vitam seternam pertineat.) 
 
 IL GREEK. 
 
 Jerem. in Actis Wirtemb. p. 367 sq. : AeiKwra^ w? TO fj,ev 
 avaa-TTjvai, Kal a,KO\ovdtjvat e(f> rj/uv Kal Svvafuv e%o/j,ev 
 (0(TT e\e<rdai, TO ayaOov ov% rjTrov rj TO tcaicov. 'Evb? Se /cat 
 IJLOVOV xprjfyfjuev, TTJS irapa 6eov &r)\aBr) /So^^et'a?, 'iva TO 
 a/yaObv KaropOuxrw^iev teal ausB&iiev, 97? p^pls ovSev dvvaat 
 
 III. LUTHERAN AND REFORMED. 
 
 A. C. p. 14: De libero arbitrio docent, quod humana 
 voluntas . . . non habeat vim sine Spiritu sancto efficiendce 
 justitiae dei seu justitiae spiritualis, . . . sed haec fit in cordi-
 
 CONVERSION AND GRACE. 147 
 
 bus, cum per verbum Spiritus sanctus concipitur. Cf. Apol. 
 A. a p. 84 sq. 
 
 Conf. Helv. i. art. 9 : Sic homini liberum arbitrium tribui- 
 mus, ut qui scientes et volentes agere nos bona et mala expe- 
 rimur, mala quidem agere sponte nostril queamus, bona vero 
 amplecti et persequi, nisi gratiS, Chr. illustrati, excitati atque 
 impulsi non queamus cet. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. ix. sec. 3 : Man, by his fall into a state of 
 sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good 
 accompanying salvation ; so as a natural man, being altogether 
 averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able by his own 
 strength to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto. 
 Sec. 4: When God converts a sinner, and translates him into 
 the state of grace, He freeth him from his natural bondage 
 under sin, and by His grace alone enables him freely to will 
 and to do that which is spiritually good ; yet so as that, by 
 reason of his remaining corruption, he doth not perfectly nor 
 only will that which is good, but doth also will that which is 
 evil. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 9 : Etsi (homo natura) nonnullam habet 
 boni et mali discretionem, affirmamus tamen, quidquid habet 
 lucis, mox fieri tenebras, cum de quserendo deo agitur ; adeo 
 ut sucl intelligenti& et ratione nullo modo posit ad eum acce- 
 dere. Item, quamvis voluntate sit prseditus, qua ad hoc vel 
 illud movetur, tamen cum ea sit penitus sub peccato captiva, 
 nullam prorsus habet ad bonum appetendum libertatem, nisi 
 quam ex grati& et dei dono acceperit. 
 
 Cf. Declar. Thorun. ii. 4. 1. 
 
 IV. ARMINIAN, ETC. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. vii. 10 : Summa gratise divinse in Christo 
 nobis reparatse necessitas et utilitas evidenter apparet, quippe 
 sine qu& nee miserabile peccati jugum excutere, nee quidquam 
 in tota religione vere bonum operari, nee denique mortem seter- 
 nam effugere unquam possumus. Comp. 3 and 4 of the Five 
 Artt. Conf. Eem. xvii. 6. 
 
 F. Socin. Opp. ii. p. 464 : Homo in hac vita" non quidem 
 viribus naturalibus, sed viribus sibi a deo per spem vitas
 
 148 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 seternse sibi ab eo factam subministratis potest del voluntatem 
 perficere. Cf. Cat. Racov. qu. 427. 
 
 Els, Conf. art. 22 : Eegeneratio est divina quaedam qualitas 
 in animal hominis vere resipiscentis, erectio imaginis del in 
 homine, renovatio mentis seu animi, vera cum veritatis cogni- 
 tione animi illuminatio secum afferens mutationem voluntatis. 
 . . . Ortum habet ex deo per Christum. Medium sive 
 instrumentum, per quod in nobis generatur, est Spiritus 
 sanctus . . . absque ulla ullius creaturae co-operatione. Cf. 
 Schyn, Plen. deduct, p. 240. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. v. ; s. above. 
 
 IL Relation of Divine Grace to Human Ability. 
 
 I. PROTESTANT SYMBOLS. 
 
 The passages which most decisively exclude human co- 
 operation are found in the symbols which deal with Synergism * 
 and Arminianism. 
 
 A. C. p. 15 : Esse fatemur liberum arbitrium omnibus 
 hominibus, . . . non per quod sit idoneum in iis, quse ad deum 
 pertinent, sine deo aut inchoare aut certe peragere cet. Cf. 
 Conf. Wirtemb.p. 104. 
 
 F. C. p. 579 : Credimus, quantum abest, ut corpus mortuum 
 se ipsum vivificare atque sibi ipsi corporalem vitam restituere 
 possit, tantum abesse, ut homo, qui ratione peccati spiritualiter 
 mortuus est, se ipsum in vitam spirit, revocandi nil am facul- 
 tatem habeat. 
 
 II. p. 662 : Antequam homo per Sp. s. illuminatur, conver- 
 titur, regeneratur et trahitur, ex sese et propriis naturalibus 
 
 1 Synergism is described in F. C. 677. Melancthon, Loci (1535) : Videmns 
 (in conversions) conjungi has causas, verbum, Spiritum sanctum et voluntatem 
 non sane otiosam sed repugnantem infirmitati suae. . . . Si de tota vita piorum 
 loquamur, etsi est ingens imbecillitas, tamen est aliqua libertas voluntatis, 
 quum quidem jam adjuvetur a Sp. sancto cet. And in the Definit. of liberum 
 arbitrium: esse in homine facultatem applicandi se ad graliam. Cf. Conf. Ankalt. 
 p. 15. Semper ecclesise nostrae docuerunt, in conversione hominis concurrere 
 haec tria, verbum dei, Spiritum sanctum, quern pater et filius mittunt, ut 
 accendat nostra corda et trahat per verbum, voluntatis denique per verbi medi- 
 tationem divinitus mote assensum.
 
 CONVERSION AND GEACE. 149 
 
 suis viribus in rebus spiritualibus et ad conversionem aut 
 regenerationem suam nihil inchoare, operari aut co-operari 
 potest, nee plus quam lapis, truncus aut limus (cf. Luther ad 
 Gen. cap. 19). 
 
 Ib. p. 666 : Quamvis renati etiam in hac vita eo usque 
 progrediantur, ut bonum velint eoque delectentur, et bene 
 agere atque in pietate proficere studeant: tamen hoc ipsum 
 non a nostr& voluntate aut a viribus nostris proficiscitur, sed 
 Spiritus sanctus operatur in nobis illud velle et perficere. 
 
 Ib. p. 674: Consequitur, quam primum Spiritus sanctus 
 per verbum et sacramenta opus suum regenerationis et reno- 
 vationis in nobis inchoavit, quod revera tune per virtutem 
 Spiritus sancti co-operari possimus ac debeamus, quamvis 
 multa adhuc infirmitas concurrat. Hoc vero ipsum, quod 
 co-operamur, non ex nostris carnalibus et naturalibus viribus 
 est, sed ex novis illis viribus et donis, quse Spiritus sanctus in 
 conversione in nobis inchoavit. 
 
 Ib. p. 582: Quod D. Lutherus scripsit, hominis voluntatem 
 in conversione pure passive se habere, id recte et dextre est 
 accipiendum, videL respectu divinse gratiae in accendendis 
 novis motibus, h. e. de eo intelligi oportet, quando Sp. dei per 
 verbum auditum aut per usum sacramentorum hominis volun- 
 tatem aggreditur et conversionem atque regenerationem in 
 homine operatur. Postquam enim Sp. s. hoc ipsum jam 
 operatus est atque effecit, hominisque voluntatem sola sua 
 divina virtute et operatione immutavit atque renovavit, tune 
 revera hominis nova ilia voluntas instrumentum est dei Spiritus 
 sancti, ut ea non modo gratiam apprehendat, verum etiam in 
 operibus sequentibus Spiritui sancto co-operetur. 
 
 Ib. p. 677: Eejicitur Papistarum et Scholasticorum error, 
 qui docuerunt, quod homo naturalibus suis viribus initium ad 
 agendum bonum et ad conversionem suam facere possit, sed 
 quia infirmior sit, quam ut bene ccepta perficere queat, quod 
 Spiritus sanctus ilia, quse naturalibus propriis viribus inchoata 
 erant, adjuvet et absolvat. 
 
 Ib. p. 677: Item (rejicitur) Synergistarum dogma, qui 
 fingunt, hominem in rebus spiritualibus non prorsus ad 
 bonum esse emortuum, sed tantum graviter vulneratum et 
 semimortuum esse. Et quamvis liberum arbitrium infirmius
 
 150 CONFESSIONS OF CHKISTENDOM. 
 
 sit, quam ut initium facere et se ipsum propriis viribus acl 
 deum convertere et legi toto corde obedire possit, tamen si 
 Spiritus sanctus initium faciat et nos per evangelium vocet, 
 gratiam suam, remissionem peccatorum et seternam salutem 
 nobis offerat, tune liberum arbitrium propriis suis naturalibus 
 viribus deo occurrere, aliquo modo (aliquid saltern, etsi parum 
 et languide) ad conversionem suam conferre, earn adjuvare, 
 co-operari, sese ad gratiam prseparare et applicare, earn appre- 
 hendere, amplecti, evangelic credere, et quidem in continua- 
 tione et conservatione hujus operis propriis suis viribus una cum 
 Spiritu sancto co-operari posse. Contra hunc errorem supra 
 demonstration est, quod facultas applicandi se ad gratiam non 
 ex nostris naturalibus propriis viribus, sed ex sola Spiritus 
 sancti operatione promanet. 
 
 The conversion here spoken of is not to be understood of 
 the so-called conversion of a baptized Christian, still less of 
 his daily renewal; it is the conversion of one not yet bap- 
 tized. This conversion is identical with regeneration. Form. 
 Cone. p. 675. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 9 : Quantum ad bonum et virtutes, in- 
 tellectus hominis non recte judicat de divinis ex semetipso. . . . 
 Constat vero, mentem vel intellectum ducem esse voluntatis, 
 cum autem coecus sit dux, claret, quousque et voluntas pertin- 
 gat. Proinde nullum est ad bonum homini arbitrium liberum 
 nondum renato, vires nullse ad perficiendum bonum. In re- 
 generatione . . . voluntas non tantum mutatur per Spiritum, 
 sed etiam instruitur facultatibus, ut sponte velit et possit 
 bonum. Nisi hoc dederimus, negabimus christianam liber- 
 tatem et inducemus legalem servitutem. Observandum est 
 . . . regenerates in boni electione et operatione non tantum 
 agere passive, sed active. Aguntur enim a deo, ut agant ipsi, 
 quod agunt. 
 
 TJiirty-nine Artt. art. x. : The condition of man, after the 
 fall of Adam, is such that he cannot turn and prepare himself 
 by his own natural strength and good works to faith, and 
 calling upon God ; wherefore we have no power to do good 
 works, pleasant and acceptable to God, without the grace of 
 God by Christ preventing us, that we may have a good will, 
 and working with us, when we have that good will.
 
 CONVERSION AND GRACE. 151 
 
 Conf. Scot. art. 1 2 : Natura ita sumus mortui, coeci et per- 
 versi, ut nee sentiamus cum pungimur, . . . nee dei voluntati, 
 cum nobis revelatur, queamus assentiri, nisi Spiritus domini 
 nostri, quod mortuum est, vivificet, auferat tenebras mentium 
 nostrarum et rebellionem cordium in obsequium benedictse 
 voluntatis ipsius flectat. Itaque confitemur . . . Spiritum 
 s. sine omni meriti nostri respectu, sive sit ante sive post re- 
 generationem, nos sanctificasse et regenerasse cet. 
 
 Of. Conf. Gall art. 12 ; Conf. Tetrap. 3 ; Conf. Belg. art. 14. 
 
 Can. Dor dr. cap. 3, art. 3 : Omnes homines in peccato con- 
 cipiuntur . . . inepti ad omne bonum salutare . . . et dbsque 
 SpiritiLS sancti regenerantis gratia ad deum redire, naturam de- 
 pravatam corrigere, vel ad ejus correctionem se disponere nee 
 volunt, nee possunt. 
 
 Ibid. art. 14 : Fides dei donum est non eo, quod a deo 
 hominis arbitrio offeratur, sed quod homini re ips^, conferatur, 
 inspiretur et infundatur. Non etiam, quod deus potentiam 
 credendi tantum conferat, conscnsum vero seu actum credendi 
 ab hominis deinde arbitrio exspectet, sed quod et velle credere 
 et ipsum credere in homine efficiat. 
 
 Hid. cap. 3, reject, error. 4 : (Eejiciuntur) qui decent, 
 hominem irregenitum non esse proprie nee totaliter in peccatis 
 mortuum aut omnibus ad bonum spirituale viribus destitutum, 
 sed posse justitiam vel vitam esurire ac sitire, sacrificiumque 
 spiritus contriti, . . . quod deo acceptum est, offerre. 
 
 Hid. art. 1 1 : Quando deus . . . veram in electis conver- 
 sionem operatur, non tantum evangelium illis externe praedi- 
 cari curat et mentem eorum per Sp. s. potenter illuminat, 
 . . . sed ejusdem etiam Sp. regenerantis emcacia cor clausum 
 aperit, durum emollit, voluntati novas qualitates infundit 
 facitque earn ex mortusi, vivam, ex nolente volentem cet. 
 Art. 1 2 : Turn voluntas jam renovata non tantum agitur et 
 movetur a deo, sed a deo acta agit et ipsa. Cf. art. 1 6. S. 
 Form. Consens. Helv. 21 (Heidegger, Corp. theol. christ. x. 85 
 sq.). 
 
 Thus the natural man has only the power of resisting grace. 
 [All else is wrought by the Holy Spirit. He opens the heart, 
 enlightens the understanding, and softens the will Thus a 
 co-operation of the human will in conversion on the part of
 
 152 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 unbaptized persons is not taught. It is otherwise with the 
 baptized. Of them it must, however, be maintained that they 
 co-operate with the Spirit. And that is no Synergism.] 
 
 II. KOMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 6, cap. 5 : Vocantur (adulti), ut, qui per 
 peccata a deo aversi erant, per ejus excitantem atque adjuvan- 
 tem gratiam ad convertendum se ad suam ipsorum justifica- 
 tionem, eidem gratiae libere assentiendo et co-operando, dis- 
 ponantur, ita, ut tangente deo cor hominis per Spiritus sancti 
 illuminationem, neque homo ipse nihil omnino agat, inspira- 
 tionem illam recipiens, (quippe qui illam et abjicere potest), 
 neque tamen sine gratia dei movere se ad justitiam coram illo 
 libera sua voluntate possit. 
 
 Ib. cap. 6 : Dispommtur ad ipsam justitiam, dum excitati 
 divina" gratia" et adjuti, fidem ex auditu concipientes, libere 
 moventur in deuni, credentes vera esse, quse divinitus revelata 
 et promissa sunt atque illud imprimis : a deo justificari im- 
 pium per gratiam ejus, per redemtionem, quae est in Christo 
 Jesu ; et dum peccatores se esse intelligentes, a divine jus- 
 titiaa timore, quo utiliter concutiuntur, ad considerandam dei 
 misericordiam se convertendo in spem eriguntur (fidentes Deum 
 sibi propter Christum propitium fere ; illumque tanquam 
 omnis justitias fontem diligere incipiunt). 
 
 Ib. cap. 7 : . . . justitiam in nobis recipientes unusquisque 
 . . . secundum propriam dispositionem et co-operationem. 
 
 Ib. can. 3 : Si quis dix,, sine praeveniente Sp. s. inspiratione 
 atque ejus adjutorio hominem credere, sperare, diligere aut 
 pcenitere posse, sicut oportet, ut ei justificationis gratia con- 
 feratur, anathema sit. 
 
 Ib. can. 4 : Si quis dix,, liberum hominis arbitrium a deo 
 motum et excitatum nihil co-operari assentiendo de excitanti 
 atque vocanti, quo ad obtinendam justificationis gratiam se 
 disponat ac praeparet, neque posse dissentire, si velit, sed veluti 
 inanime quoddam nihil omnino agere mereque passive se 
 habere, anath. sit. 
 
 In a very luminous sketch, Bellarmin, De grat. vi. 1 5, gives 
 the Eoman doctrine of the relation of lib. arbitr. to gratia
 
 CONVERSION AND GEACE. 153 
 
 div. dar. Cf. Mohler, Symbol. 11; Klee, Dogmat. iii. S. 
 25 ff. 
 
 [Perrone, Prcdectiones theologicce Romce, 1837, v. 135, 136: 
 Inst. Peccatores in Scripturis passim mortui ac sepulti dicuntur ; 
 nihil igitur operantur cum per Christi gratiam in vitam revo- 
 cantur. E. N. Cons. Licet enim peccatores reipsa mortui sint 
 in ordine ad vitam spiritualem, fruuntur tamen vita natural!, 
 dum propterea per gratiam praevenientem excitantur, capaces 
 fiunt ad assensum praestandum, si eidem gratise velint ob- 
 temperare.] 
 
 III. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 59 : Aei^yei, o ayios SiSa<r/eaXo? (Basilius), 
 7TW9 Kaka KCU fj avOpwrrlirrj Befarja-is, efiXdfirj [te TO TrpoiraroptKov 
 dudpTt)fj,a, \ o\ov TOVTO teal rtopa Kara rbv Trapovra Kaipbv 45 
 TTJV irpoaipeaiv TOV KO.& evo? ore/eerafc TO va elvat Ka\bs Kal reK- 
 vov 0eoV) r) /ca/co? Kal vtbs 8ia/36\ov. 6\ov TOVTO etvat, el$ T 
 /cat eov<riav TOV avOpwTrow Kal et? fiev TO Ka\ov -f) Oeia 
 <TV/u,/3o7)da' d\\a Kal dirb TO KUKOV rj tola yvpt^ei TOV avOpwtrov, 
 va dvayKaa-r) TO avTe^ovcriov TOV dvOpwirov. 
 
 Jerem. in Act. Wirtenib. p. 367: OvSev Kw\vei Kal /ttera 
 Tr)V K 7rapa{3da-eco<; TTTSxriv KK\ivai fiev cnrb TOV KaKov TOV 
 avdpaJTrov, eTreKraKTOV 6Wo? vroirja'ai, Se TO dyaObv Kal TO KdXbv 
 aipel<rdai, a>? e-^ovra TO avTe^ovaiov. . . . '.E/e Sij TOVTCOV 
 SeiKWTai, a>? TO (tev dvaa-Trjvat, Kal dKoXovdrjcrai l(j>' 
 l SvvafAiv e%pjjLV WCTTG k\o~6ai TO dyadcv ov% fjTTOv 
 TI TO KaKov. 'Evb<s oe Kal povov ^pij^ofjiev, Trjs Trapa Oeov Brj- 
 XaS?) Poi]6e[a<s, '(va TO dyadbv KaTOpdaxrufiev Kal cwOwpev, 77? 
 ^topl? ovoev avvaai la"xyofJ,6V. 
 
 The former passage from the Conf. orth. speaks merely in 
 general of a divine assistance in man's renewal ; the second, 
 that of Jeremias, appears to declare that man can voluntarily 
 turn to good, or begin his change, but that for the full accom- 
 plishment of his renewal the divine aid is needful. On the 
 other hand, Plato (Cat. 107) refers all to grace, defined as 
 preventing, awakening, justifying, and co-operating in the 
 justified. Dositheus, Conf. 3, expresses himself in a Eoman 
 manner, laying clown a ^a/w -jrpoKadapTiKij (gratia prseveniens) 
 and a o-vvepjelv of grace, and the human
 
 154 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 IV. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. Itacov. qu. 422 : Estne liberum arbitrium situm in 
 nostra potestate, ut deo obtemperemus ? Prorsus. Etenira 
 certum est, primum horn, ita a deo condition fuisse, ut libero 
 arbitrio praeditus esset. Nee vero ulla caussa subest, cur deus 
 post ejus lapsum ilium eo privaret cet. 
 
 Jb. qu. 427 : Expone, quam longe vis ipsa liberi arbitrii 
 pateat. Communiter in hominibus natura exiguae admodum 
 sunt vires ad ea quae deus ab illis requirit perficiendum, at 
 voluntas ad ea perficiendum omnibus adest natura. Nihilo- 
 minus tamen eae vires non ita prorsus exiguae sunt, ut homo 
 si vim sibi facere velit divino auxilio accedente, non possit 
 voluntati divinae obsecundare. Cf. qu. 447. 
 
 Ib. qu. 428-30 : Auxilium divinum duplex est, interius et 
 exterius. (Exterius auxilium divinum) sunt promissa et 
 minae, quorum tamen promissa vim habent longe majorem. 
 Unde etiam, quod sint sub novo fcedere longe praestantiora 
 promissa, quam sub vetere fuerint, facilius est sub novo quam 
 sub vetere foedere voluntatem dei facere. 1 (Interius auxi- 
 lium divinum est) id, cum deus in cordibus eorum, qui ipsi 
 obediunt, quod promisit (vitam seternam), obsignat. Later re- 
 vision : Quod Sp. sancti donum est ? Est ejusmodi dei affla- 
 tus, quo animi nostri vel uberiore rerum div. notitia vel spe 
 vitae aet. certiore atque adeo gaudio ac gustu quodam futurae 
 felicitatis aut singular! ardore complentur. 
 
 (F. Socin. Prcelect. theol. cap. 5 : Interius auxilium duplex 
 est, unum, cum deus id, quod sibi obedientibus promisit, eorum 
 etiam cordibus quodammodo inscribit ; alterum, cum ad ipsius 
 voluntatem recte percipiendam, quae in externo verbo propter 
 res infinitas, de quibus in humanat vit& agere et deliberare 
 
 1 F. Socin. Opp. iL p. 463 : Quilibct homo, ubi ad earn setatem pervenerit, ut 
 rationis usum habeat, si nulla mala institutione aut usu corruptus fuerit, posset, 
 si plane id vellet, nullum ex iis peccatis committere, quae cum ipsa ratione 
 pugnant eique per se omnino adversantur. Sed, ut ea peccata vitare possit, quae 
 ipsi rationi per se non omnino adversantur, necesse est prseterea, ut sibi persua- 
 deat ac speret, si ilia vitaverit, se ingens aliquod inde bonum consecuturum. 
 Propterea deus prseceptis suis, quae per Christum dedit, . . . addidit vite 
 seternae promissum, cui ut fidem adhibere possint, iis omnibus generatim con- 
 cedit, quibus ipse Christus ejusque evangelium annunciatur.
 
 CONVERSION AND GEACE. 155 
 
 contingit, expresse omnino contineri nequit, mentem erudit, 
 eamque illustrat. - Ex his duobus interioribus auxiliis prius 
 magis proprium est N". T., posterius vero Veteris. Ex iis 
 autem, quse dicta sunt, colligi potest, verum auxilium id esse, 
 quod exterius appellavimus, cum interius utriusque generis 
 nihil aliud sit, quam exterioris suggestio qusedam et obsig- 
 natio, prsesertim vero, cum nemini interius contingat, nisi prius 
 exteriore recte usus sit. Credentibus enim et obedientibus 
 Sp. s. datur.) 
 
 Cat. Rac. qu. 369 sq. : Omnibusne interior obsignatio con- 
 tingit, quibus exterior, hoc est, quibus evangelium annun- 
 ciatur ? Nequaquam ; verum iis tantum, qui evangelic sibi 
 annunciate crediderint et exteriorem illam rationem, quam 
 deus in confirmanda promissione vitse seternse adhibet, am- 
 plexi eoque usi, quemadmodum oportet, fuerint. Etenim si 
 iUud donum Sp. s., quod ad tempus duravit, non dabatur nisi 
 credentibus evangelic, multo magis id Sp. s. donum, quod per- 
 petuum est, aliis non dari statuendum est, nisi qui et evangelio 
 plane crediderint et illud ex animo amplexi fuerint. (Cf. 
 Socin. Opp. i. p. 98 a.) Nonne ad credendum evangelio Sp. 
 s. interiore dono opus est ? Nullo modo ; nee enim in Scrip- 
 turis sacris legimus, cuiquam id conferri donum nisi credenti 
 evangelio. 
 
 Hence their doctrine is : 1. That man may, by means of 
 the freewill indwelling in him, turn to faith and obedience 
 towards God ; 2. That God on His part furthers this return 
 by threatenings and promises, especially the latter ; 3. That 
 God works in those who have become believing and obedient 
 a certain hope (obsignatio}, and thus completes the regenera- 
 tion. The perfect fulfilment of the divine commandments 
 depends on this obsignation, as Socinus says : Homo in hac 
 vita" . . . viribus sibi a deo per spem vitse seternae sibi ab eo 
 factam subministratis, potest dei voluntatem perficere. 
 
 V. ARMINIAN. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. xvii. 5 : Homo non ex arbitrii sui liberi 
 viribus regeneratur aut convertitur, quandoquidem in statu 
 peccati nihil boni, quod quidem salutare bonum sit, ex se ipso
 
 156 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 vel a se ipso vel cogitare potest, nedum velle aut facere, sed 
 necesse est, ut a deo in Christo per verbum evangelii eique 
 adjunctam Spiritus sancti virtutem (cf. xvii. 2) regeneretur 
 atque totus renovetur. 6 : Gratiam itaque del statuimus esse 
 principium, progressum et complementum omnis boni, adeo ut 
 ne ipse quidem regenitus absque praecedente ista sive praeve- 
 niente, excitante, prosequente et co-operante gratia bonum 
 ullum salutare cogitare, velle aut peragere possit. Cf. Curcell. 
 Eel. chr. instit. vi. 12. 2 sq. How far the natural ability of 
 man may co-operate to conversion, the Conf. does not ex- 
 pressly say ; but it requires of Christians free obedience, and 
 consequently does not limit the power of the unregenerate to 
 that of withstanding grace. In the natural man is, rather, 
 a facultas verbum, div. amplectendi u. potestas illud rejiciendi. 
 S. Limborch, Theol. chr. iv. 13. 22. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Eetnonstr. p. 1 6 2 b : Gratia efficax vocatur ex 
 eventu, quod tamen potest dupliciter accipi: primo sic, ut 
 gratia statuatur ex se nullam habere vim ad producendum 
 consensum in voluntate, sed tota efficacia ejus sit ex parte 
 voluntatis humanae; secundo sic, ut statuatur gratia habere 
 ex se sufficientem vim ad producendum consensum in volun- 
 tate, sed, quia vis ilia partialis est, non posse exire in actum 
 sine co-operatione liberae voluntatis humanae, ac proinde ut 
 effectum habeat, pendere a libera voluntate. Alterum sensum 
 suum esse volunt Eemonstrantes. Here there is a co-opera- 
 tion of the human will with grace, as in Limborch, T/ieol. chr. 
 iv. 12. 8 : Sciendum vocationem triplici significatu solere dici 
 efficacem (1) praecise secundum naturatam, quatenus actualis 
 quaedam motio est voluntati a deo immissa, quae non tantum 
 vim habet et efficacitatem formaliter excitandi in voluntate 
 consensum, sed et effective concurrendi cum voluntate ad con- 
 sensum. ... (3) Ex parte effectus, quando voluntas illi co- 
 operatur. Itaque sufficiens vocatio, quando per co-operationem 
 liberi arbitrii sortitur suum effectum, vocatur efficax. iv. 13. 
 27 : Si onmes actus et operationes, quibus verbum circa 
 homines operatur, consideremus, liquet hominem in quovis 
 instanti libertate tarn rejiciendi verbum quam recipiendi prae- 
 ditum. Et nisi ea semper adesset libertas, nulla esset virtus 
 obedientiae, nullum vitium inobedientiae cet. iv. 14. 21 : Re-
 
 CONVERSION AND GRACE. 157 
 
 cipit Hie gratiam per rectum liberi arbitrii gratia divina exci- 
 tati usum, ille earn rejicit per pravum liberi arbitrii abusum 
 novamque contra gratiam divinam contumaciam. . . . Ergo 
 liberum arbitrium co-operatur cum gratia? Fatemur, alias 
 nulla obedientia aut inobedientia hominis locum habet. 
 Dices : An co-operatio liberi arbitrii non est bonum salutare ? 
 Eesp. omnino. Dices : Ergo gratia non est primaria causa 
 salutis. Eesp. non est solitaria, sed tamen primaria, ipsa enim 
 liberi arbitrii co-operatio est a gratia tanquam primaria causa ; 
 nisi enim a praeveniente gratia liberum arbitrium excitatum 
 esset, gratise co-operari non posset. 
 
 Accordingly the Arminians hold a constant co-operation of 
 the human will, awakened by grace, with the divine grace ; 
 but the influence of the latter appears to them by no means 
 merely moral : l it is the power of the Holy Ghost connected 
 with the divine word (Con. JRem. xvii. 2. 5) which influences 
 the mind, and is in its nature supernatural, although the kind 
 of operation is perfectly analogous with the natural power of 
 all truth. 
 
 VI. THE MENNONITES. 
 
 The Mennonites ascribe to man a freedom whereby he 
 can accept or refuse the good offered by God. This declares 
 that man cannot of himself will or produce in himself good ; 
 so also what Schyn says of concupiscence. Hence he gives 
 this view of their doctrine. Schyn, Plen. deduct, p. 240 : 
 Ista facultas NB. oblatam dei gratiam accipiendi vel reji- 
 ciendi ex gratia (dei) in omnibus remansit (Adami) posteris. 
 Mennonitse non dicunt, per se et ex propriis sibi innatis 
 
 1 Canones Dordrac. in. 12 : Eegencratio neutiquam fit per solam forinsecus 
 insonantem doctrinam, inoralem suasionem vel talem operandi rationem, ut post 
 dei operationem in hominis potestate maneat, regenerari vel non regenerari ; sed 
 est plane supernaturalis, potentissima simul et suavissima mirabilis, arcana et 
 ineffabilis operatic, . . . adeo ut omnes illi, in quorum cordibus admirando 
 hoc modo deus operatur, certo, infallibiliter et efficaciter regenerentur et actu 
 credant. What we find in Conf. Rem. vi. 2 treats of the general divine influence 
 apart from Christianity, and the hortationes, suasiones, signa, prodigia, are the 
 common experiences of life, tending to good, which do not exclude or render 
 needless the operatic Sp. sancli.
 
 158 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 viribus bonum posse praestari, sed non nisi primo a deo obla- 
 tuni, qui hoc ex mera 4 su& gratia largitur per verbum et suum 
 spiritum . . ., ita ut sit gratia in principio, gratio in medio 
 et mera gratia in fine ipsius salutis. 
 
 VII. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers hold the natural man to be altogether unable 
 to release himself from evil by his own power, to free himself 
 from the thraldom of the evil seed; and therefore ascribe 
 regeneration entirely to the power of Christ, which first influ- 
 ences the mind as a call, then imparts the inner light to those 
 who do not resist this power. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop, vii 3 : First, then, as by the explana- 
 tion of the former thesis appears, we renounce all natural 
 power and ability in ourselves, in order to bring us out of 
 our lost and fallen condition and first nature; and confess 
 that as of ourselves we are able to do nothing that is good, 
 so neither can we procure remission of sins or justification by 
 any act of our own, so as to merit it, or draw it as a debt from 
 God due to us ; but we acknowledge all to be of and from His 
 love, which is the original and fundamental cause of our accept- 
 ance. . . . We consider, then, our redemption as a twofold 
 respect or state, both which in their own nature are perfect, 
 though in their application to us the one is not, nor cannot 
 be, without respect to the other. . . . The first is the redemp- 
 tion performed and accomplished by Christ for us in His cruci- 
 fied body without us ; the other is the redemption wrought by 
 Christ in us, which no less properly is called and accounted 
 a redemption than the former. The first, then, is that whereby 
 a man, as he stands in the Fall, is put into a capacity of sal- 
 vation, and hath conveyed unto him a measure of that power, 
 virtue, spirit, life, and grace that was in Christ Jesus, which, 
 as the free gift of God, is able to counterbalance, overcome, 
 and root out the evil seed wherewith we are naturally, as in 
 the Fall, leavened. 
 
 The second is that whereby we witness and know this pure 
 and perfect redemption in ourselves, purifying, cleansing, and 
 redeeming us from the power of corruption, and bringing us
 
 CONVERSION AND GKACE. 159 
 
 into unity, favour, and friendship with God. By the first of 
 these two, we that were lost in Adam, plunged into the bitter 
 and corrupt seed, unable of ourselves to do any good thing, 
 but naturally joined and united to evil, forward and prepense 
 to all iniquity, servants and slaves to the power and spirit of 
 darkness, are, notwithstanding all this, so far reconciled to God 
 by the death of His Son, while enemies, that we are put into 
 a capacity of salvation, having the glad tidings of the gospel 
 of peace offered unto us, and God is reconciled unto us in 
 Christ, calls and invites us unto Himself. ... By the second 
 we witness this capacity brought into act, whereby, receiving 
 and not resisting the purchase of His death, to wit, the light, 
 spirit, and grace of Christ revealed in us, we witness and pos- 
 sess a real, true, and inward redemption from the power and 
 prevalency of sin. ... 2 5 : If all men have received a loss 
 from Adam which leads to condemnation, then all men have 
 received a gift from Christ which leads to justification. . . . 
 That this saving light and seed, or a measure of it, is given 
 to all, Christ tells us expressly in the parable of the sower. 
 But this light or seed of God in man he cannot stir up when 
 he pleaseth ; but it moves, flows, and strives with man, as the 
 Lord seeth meet. For, could there be a possibility of salva- 
 tion to every man during the day of his visitation, yet cannot 
 a man at any time when he pleaseth, or hath some sense of 
 his misery, stir up that light and grace so as to procure to 
 himself tenderness of heart, etc. . . . Prop. vii. 10 says of 
 the works of righteousness which the justified perform, that 
 they are the works of the Spirit of grace in the heart, wrought 
 in conformity to the inward and spiritual law ; which works 
 are not wrought on man's will, nor by his power and dbiUty, but 
 in and by the power and Spirit of Christ in us. 
 
 Prop. v. and vi. 12 : First, then, by this day and time of 
 visitation, which we say God gives unto all, during which they 
 may be saved, we do not understand the whole time of every 
 man's life ; though to some it may be extended even to the 
 very hour of death, as we see in the example of the thief con- 
 verted on the cross : but such a season at least as sufficiently 
 exonerateth God of every man's condemnation, which to some 
 may be sooner, and to others later, according as the Lord in.
 
 160 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 His wisdom sees meet. So that many men may outlive this 
 day, after which there may be no possibility of salvation to 
 them. . . . [The nature of the grace that works upon men is 
 thus described :] We understand not this seed, light, or grace 
 to be an accident, as most men ignorantly do, but a real spiri- 
 tual substance, which the soul of man is capable to feel and 
 apprehend, from which that real, spiritual, inward birth in 
 believers arises, called the new creature, the new man in the 
 heart. 
 
 Prop, vii thus defines the operations of this grace : As 
 many as resist not this light, but receive the same, it becomes 
 in them an holy, pure, and spiritual birth, bringing forth holi- 
 ness, righteousness, purity, and all those other fruits which are 
 acceptable to God : by which holy birth, to wit, Jesus Christ 
 formed within ^ls, and working His works in us, as we are 
 sanctified, so we are justified in the sight of God.
 
 IX. 
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GEACE : PREDESTINATION. 
 
 POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 THE influence of divine grace, which is, according to the 
 common Protestant doctrine, indispensable to conversion, is in 
 the Lutheran and Arminian confessions proffered to all men 
 without distinction; may, however, be contemned by them 
 (gratia resistibilis), which leaves them to bear the penalty of 
 their eternal condemnation. According to the Eeformed 
 symbols, or most of them, based upon the Calvinistic prin- 
 ciples and the decrees of the Synod of Dort, as also of the 
 Form. Cons. Helv., God imparts His renewing grace only to 
 those whom He chose, in His eternal unconditional counsel 
 and purpose (decretum dbsolutum), to save by grace ; and in 
 all these, grace works irresistibly conversion (gratia irresisti- 
 lilis). All others, for whom that grace was not designed, are 
 appointed by God to eternal damnation ; but they suffer as the 
 result of their own guilt, therefore righteously, because the 
 unconverted man has deserved from God nothing but everlast- 
 ing doom. In the Eoman Church, the Jansenists hold the 
 same doctrine of particular redemption. The other Eoman 
 Catholics, however, teach the universality of grace ; as also do 
 the Greeks, Mennonites, and Quakers. 
 
 Although Zwingli had not been a stranger to the predesti- 
 narian dogma, yet it was Calvin who introduced it into the 
 Eeformed Church, with all its consequences and all its stern- 
 ness. Calv. Institt. iii. 21. After many vicissitudes, he was 
 able to win acceptance for the doctrine agreed upon in the 
 
 L
 
 162 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Cons. past. eccl. Genevce, among the other cantons of Switzerland, 
 and the Eeformed Churches of Germany and the Netherlands. 
 The Church of Zurich held out longest. In the Netherlands, 
 at the end of the sixteenth century, the Predestinarians were 
 divided into two parties : the one, faithful to Calvin and 
 Beza, so made the absolute decree of predestination precede the 
 Fall, that this Fall itself, and with it, consequently, the ever- 
 lasting ruin of the reprobate, was decreed by God at man's 
 creation. These were the Supralapsarians. The others, of a 
 milder type, regarded the decree of predestination as formed 
 with reference to the Fall, as only permitted by Him. These 
 were the Infralapsarians. The latter view carried the victory 
 at the Synod of Dort. By the Form. Cons. Helv. the Calvin- 
 Dort decrees were proclaimed as the faith of the Swiss Church, 
 but only to be again renounced. 
 
 L SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 EEFORMED SYMBOLS. 
 
 a. Those which Tfiaintain a stricter Predestination. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 12 : Credimus ex corruptione et damna- 
 tione universal!, in qu& omnes homines natural sunt submersi, 
 deum alios quidem eripere, quos videlicet aeterno et immuta- 
 bili suo consilio, sola sua bonitate et misericordia nulloque 
 operum ipsorum respectu in Jesu Christo elegit ; alios vero in 
 e& coruptione et damnatione relinquere, in quibus nimirum 
 juste suo tempore damnandis justitiam suam demonstret, sicut 
 in aliis divitias misericordiae suae declarat. Nee enim alii 
 aliis sunt meliores, donee illos deus discernat ex immutabili 
 illo consilio, quod ante seculorum creationem in Jesu Christo 
 detenninavit : neque posset quisquam su& vi sibi ad bonum 
 illud aditum patefacere, quum ex natural, nostni ne unum 
 quidem rectum motum vel affectum seu cogitationem habere 
 possimus, donee nos deus gratis prseveniat et ad rectitudinem 
 fonnet. 
 
 Conf. Gall, ii p. 8 : God looketh upon us in grace, taketh 
 compassion on us, and hath no other reason for showing His
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE : PREDESTINATION. 163 
 
 grace and mercy towards us, than only His kindness and pitiful- 
 ness. Then we hold that the goodness which He hath shown 
 towards us comes from this, that He before the world's crea- 
 tion chose us, ... before we were born He elected us, and 
 took us out of the common damnation in which all men were 
 shut up. [Orig. in German.] 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 16 : Credimus, deum, posteaquam tota 
 Adanai progenies sic in perditionem et exitium primi hominis 
 culpa prsecipitata fuit, deum se talem demonstrasse, qualis est, 
 nimirum misericordem et justum, misericordem quidem, eos 
 ab hac perditione liberando et servando, quos seterno et im- 
 mutabili suo consilio pro gratuita" sua" bonitate in Jesu Christo 
 elegit et selegit, absque ullo operum ipsorum respectu ; justum 
 vero, reliquos in lapsu et perditione, in quam sese ipsi prse- 
 cipitaverant, relinquendo. 1 
 
 Canon. Dordr. cap. i art. 1 : Cum omnes homines in Adamo 
 peccaverint et rei sint facti maledictionis et mortis seternae, 
 deus nemini fecisset injuriam, si universum genus humanum 
 in peccato et maledictione relinquere ac propter peccatum 
 damnare voluisset. Art. 3 : Ut autem homines ad fidem ad- 
 ducantur, deus clementer laetissimi hujus nuntii prsecones mittit 
 ad quos vult et quando vult, quorum ministerio homines ad 
 resipiscentiam et fidem in Ch. vocantur. 
 
 Ib. art. 6 : Quod aliqui in tempore fide a deo donantur, 
 aliqui non donantur, id ab seterno ipsius decreto provenit; 
 . . . secundum quod decretum electorum corda, quantumvis 
 dura, gratiose emollit et ad credendum inflectit, non-electos 
 autem justo judicio suse malitise et duritise relinquit. Atque 
 hie potissimum sese nobis aperit profunda, misericors pariter 
 
 1 F. Homm's edition has at the end this bracketed clause: Hac ratione 
 declarat, se esse misericordem et clementem deum iis, quos salvos facit, quibus 
 nihil debebat, uti quoque se declarat justum judicem ostensione justae severitatis 
 suse erga reliquos. Atque interim illis nullam facit injuriam. Nam quod non- 
 nullos salvos facit, non propterea fit, quod isti aliis sint meliores, cum omnes in 
 exitium certum prolapsi sint, donee deus eos discernat et liberet secundum aeter- 
 num atque immutabile propositum suum, quod in J. C. fundatum est, antequam 
 mundus creatus fuit. Nemo itaque secundum hanc sententiam ad hanc gloriam 
 pervenire per se ipsum potest, quoniam a nobis ipsis non sumus idonei ad cogi- 
 tandum aliquid boni, nisi deus per gratiam ac meram bonitatem suam nos prae- 
 veniat ; adeo natura nostra corrupta est.
 
 164 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 et justa hominum aequaliter perditorum discretio, sive decre- 
 tum illud electionis et reprobationis in verbo del revelatum. 
 
 Ib. ait. 7 : Est autem electio immutabile del propositum, 
 quo ante jacta mundi fundamenta ex universo genere humano, 
 ex primaeval integritate in peccatum et exitium sua culpa pro- 
 lapso, secundum liberrimum voluntatis suae beneplacitum, ex 
 mer& gratia^ certam quomndam hominum multitudinem aliis 
 nee meliorum nee digniorum, sed in communi miseria cum 
 aliis jacentium, ad salutem elegit in Christo, quern etiam ab 
 seterno mediatorem et omnium electorum caput salutisque 
 fundamentum constituit, atque ita eos ipsi salvandos dare et 
 ad ejus communionem per verbum et spiritum suum efficaciter 
 vocare ac trahere, seu verS, in ipsum fide donare, justificare, 
 sanctificare et potenter in filii sui communione custoditos 
 tandem glorificare decrevit, ad demonstrationem suse miseri- 
 cordiae et laudem divitiarum gloriosae sua3 gratiae (Eph. i. 4, 5, 
 6; Kom. viii. 30). 
 
 Ib. art. 9 : Electio facta est non ex praevisa fide fideique 
 obedientia, sanctitate, aut alia" aliquS, bon, qualitate et dis- 
 positione, tanquam causa seu conditione in homine eligendo 
 praerequisita, sed ad fidem fideique obedientiam, sanctitatem 
 cet. Ac proinde electio est fons omnis salutaris boni, unde 
 fides, sanetitas et reliqua dona salvifica, ipsa denique vita 
 seterna ut fructus et effectus ejus profluunt, secundum illud 
 apostoli Ephes. i. 4. 
 
 Ib. art. 1 : Causa hujus gratuitae electionis est solum dei 
 beneplacitum, non in eo consistens, quod certas qualitates seu 
 actiones humanas ex omnibus possibilibus in salutis conditio- 
 nem elegit ; sed in eo, quod certas quasdam personas ex com- 
 muni peccatorum multitudine sibi in pectilium adscivit. 
 
 Ib. art. 15 : ^Eternam et gratuitam electionis gratiam eo 
 vel maxime illustrat scriptura sacra, quod porro testatur, non 
 omnes homines esse electos, sed quosdam in aeterna dei elec- 
 tione praeteritos, quos scilicet, deus ex liberrimo, justissimo et 
 immutabili beneplacito decrevit in communi miseria, in quam 
 se sua culpa praecipitarunt, relinquere nee salvifica" fide et 
 conversionis gratia donare. 
 
 Ib. art. 1 6 : Qui vivam in Christum fidem, studium filialis 
 obedientiae cet. in se nondum efficaciter sentiunt, mediis tamen,
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE : PREDESTINATION. 165 
 
 per quae deus ista se in nobis operaturum promisit, utuntur, ii 
 ad reprobationis mentionem non consternari, nee (se) reprobis 
 accensere, sed in usu mediorum diligenter pergere ac horam 
 uberioris gratise ardenter desiderare humiliterque exspectare 
 debent cet. 
 
 Cap. ii. art. 8 : Fuit hoc dei patris liberrimum consilium et 
 gratiosissima voluntas atque intentio, ut mortis pretiosissimse 
 filii sui vivifica et salvifica efficacia sese exsereret in omnibus 
 electis, ad eos solos fide justificante donandos et per earn ad 
 salutem infallibiliter perducendos, h. e. voluit deus, ut Ch. per 
 sanguinem crucis ex omni populo, tribu, gente et lingua eos 
 omnes et solos, qui ab seterno ad salutem electi et a patre ipsi 
 dati sunt, efficaciter redimeret, fide donaret, ab omnibus pec- 
 catis . . . sanguine suo mundaret, ad finem usque fideliter 
 custodiret cet. 
 
 Cap. iii. et iv. art. 1 1 : Quando deus suum beneplacitum in 
 electis exsequitur seu veram in iis conversionem operatur, non 
 tantum evangelium illis externe prsedicari curat, et mentem 
 eorum per Spiritum sanctum potenter illuminat, ut recte in- 
 telligant et dijudicent, quae sunt spiritus dei ; sed ejusdem 
 etiam spiritus regenerantis efiicacia ad intima hominis pene- 
 trat, cor clausum aperit, durum emollit, prseputiatum circum- 
 cidit, voluntati novas qualitates infundit, facitque earn ex 
 mortua vivam, ex mala bonam, ex nolente volentem, ex refrac- 
 taria morigeram, agitque et roborat earn, ut ceu arbor bona, 
 fructus bonarum actionum proferre possit. Art. 12: At- 
 que hsec est ilia tantopere in scripturis prsedicata regeneratio, 
 nova creatio, suscitatio e mortuis et vivificatio, quam deus 
 sine nobis in nobis operatur. Ea autem neutiquam fit per 
 solam forinsecus insonantem doctrinam, moralem suasionem, 
 vel talem operandi rationem, ut post dei (quod ipsum) opera- 
 tionem in hominis potestate maneat regenerare vel non re- 
 generari, converti vel non converti, sed est plane supernaturalis, 
 potentissima simul et suavissima, mirabilis, arcana et ineffabilis 
 operatic virtute sua, secundum scripturam (quas ab auctore 
 hujus operationis est inspirata) nee creatione, nee mortuorum 
 resuscitatione minor aut inferior, adeo ut omnes illi, in quorum 
 cordibus admirando hoc modo deus operatur, certo, infallibi- 
 liter et efficaciter regenerentur et actu credant Atque turn
 
 166 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 voluntas jam renovata non tantum agitur et movetur a deo, 
 sed a deo acta agit et ipsa. Quamobrem etiam homo ipse per 
 gratiam istam acceptam credere et resipiscere recte dicitur. 
 
 Form. Cons. Helv. art. 4: Deus ante jacta mundi funda- 
 menta in Chr. fecit propositum seculonim (Ephes. iii. 11), in 
 quo ex mero voluntatis suae beneplacito sine ulla meriti, 
 operum vel fidei praevisione ad laudem gloriosae gratise suse 
 elegit certum ac definition hominum, in eadem corruptionis 
 massa . . . jacentium adeoque peccato corruptorum, numerum 
 in tempore per Ch. ad salutem perducendum ejusque merito 
 . . . efficaciter vocandum, regenerandum et fide ac resipiscentia" 
 donandum. Atque ita quidem deus gloriam suam illustrare 
 constituit, ut decreverit, primo hominem integrum creare, turn 
 ejusdem lapsum permittere ac demum ex lapsis quorundam 
 misereri adeoque eosdem eligere, alios vero in corrupta" massa 
 relinquere aeternoque tandem exitio devovere. Art. 13: Ch. 
 in tempore novi foederis sponsor factus est pro iis solis, qui 
 per seternam electionem dati ipsi sunt ut populus peculii cet. 
 Pro solis quippe electis ex decretorio patris consilio propriaque 
 intentione diram mortem oppetiit, solos illos in sinum paternse 
 gratiae restituit, solos deo reconciliavit et a maledictione legis 
 liberavit. Art. 19 : Deus nullum universale consilium inivit 
 sine determinatione personarum, Christusque adeo non pro 
 singulis sed pro solis electis sibi datis mortuus est. Quod 
 soli electi credunt, reprobi vero indurantur, id a sola" gratia; 
 del Hisp.riTniTiq.Tite proficiscitur cet. Compare the sententia 
 Helvetiorum de prsedestinatione in the Actis Synodi Dordr. 
 p. 537 sqq. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. iii sea 1 : God from all eternity did, by 
 the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and 
 unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as 
 thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered 
 to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency 
 of second causes taken away, but rather established. Sec. 2 : 
 Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass 
 upon all supposed conditions, yet hath He not decreed any- 
 thing because He foresaw it as future, or as that which would 
 come to pass upon such conditions. Sec. 3 : By the decree 
 of God for the manifestation of His glory, some men and
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE : PREDESTINATION. 167 
 
 angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others fore- 
 ordained to everlasting death. Sec. 4 : These angels and 
 men, thus predestinated and foreordained, are particularly and 
 unchangeably designed, and their number is so certain and 
 definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished. 
 Sec. 5 : Those of mankind that are predestinated unto life, 
 God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to 
 His eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel 
 and good pleasure of His will, hath chosen in Christ unto 
 everlasting glory, out of His mere free grace and love, without 
 any foresight of faith or good works, or perseverance in either 
 of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions or 
 causes moving Him thereunto, and all to the praise of His 
 glorious grace. Sec. 6 : As God hath appointed the elect 
 unto glory, so hath He, by the eternal and most free purpose 
 of His will, foreordained all the means thereunto. Wherefore 
 they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by 
 Christ; are effectually called unto faith in Christ by His 
 Spirit working in due season ; are justified, adopted, sanctified, 
 and kept by His power through faith unto salvation. Neither 
 are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually called, justified, 
 adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only. Sec. 7 : 
 The rest of mankind, God was pleased, according to the un- 
 searchable counsel of His own will, whereby He extendeth or 
 withholdeth mercy as He pleaseth, for the glory of His sove- 
 reign power over His creatures, to pass by and to ordain them 
 to dishonour and wrath for their sin, to the praise of His 
 glorious justice. Sec. 8: The doctrine of this high mystery 
 of predestination is to be handled with special prudence and 
 care, that men attending the will of God revealed in His word, 
 and yielding obedience thereunto, may, from the certainty of 
 their effectual vocation, be assured of their eternal election. 
 So shall this doctrine afford matter of praise, reverence, and 
 admiration of God, and of humility, diligence, and abundant 
 consolation to all that sincerely obey the gospel. 
 
 b. Confessions which have a milder Expression, or give Prominence 
 to universal Redemption, or keep Silence on the Question. 
 
 Conf. Basil. : We confess that God, before He created the
 
 168 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 world, chose those on whom He would bestow the inheritance 
 of eternal salvation. 
 
 Helv. ii. cap. 1 : Deus ab seterno praedestinavit vel elegit 
 libere et mera sua gratia, nullo hominum respectu, sanctos 
 quos vult salvos facere in Christo. Ergo non sine medio, 
 licet non propter ullum meritum nostrum, sed in Ch. et propter 
 Ch. nos elegit deus, ut, qui jam sunt in Christo insiti per 
 fidem, illi ipsi etiam sint electi, reprobi vero, qui sunt extra 
 Christum. . . . Et quamvis deus norit, qui sint sui et alicubi 
 mentio fiat paucitatis electorum, bene sperandum est tanien 
 de omnibus, neque temere reprobis quisquam est adnume- 
 randus. Further, the misunderstanding is obviated that 
 any one need despair of his election. Not so much in this, 
 however, as in the twofold fact, that God declares Himself 
 repeatedly to desire the salvation of all men (x. 8, 9), 
 and that faith is never spoken of as a specific gift to the 
 elect alone, there is a remarkable softening of the dogma. 
 This Confession might be placed in the borderland of Pre- 
 destinarianism. 
 
 Tliirty-nine Artt. art. 1 7 : Predestination to life is the 
 Everlasting purpose of God, whereby, before the foundations 
 of the world were laid, He hath constantly decreed by His 
 counsel, secret to us, to deliver from curse and damnation 
 those whom He hath chosen in Christ out of mankind, and to 
 bring them by Christ to everlasting salvation, as vessels made 
 to honour. Wherefore, they which be endued with so excel- 
 lent a benefit of God, be called according to God's purpose by 
 His Spirit working in due season ; they through grace obey 
 the calling ; they be justified freely ; they be made sons of 
 God by adoption ; they be made like the image of His only- 
 begotten Son Jesus Christ; they walk religiously in good 
 works, and at length, by God's mercy, they attain to everlast- 
 ing felicity. 
 
 Here it must be noted that reprobation, the severest side of 
 the predestinarian dogma, is entirely passed over. Most dis- 
 tinguished theologians of the Episcopal Church have departed 
 either stealthily or openly from the Calvin-Dort dogma. This 
 was accepted, however, by the Judicia tlieolog, Magn. Brit, de 
 V. Artt. Remonst. (in the Actis Synodi Dordr. p. 489), which
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE: PREDESTINATION. 169 
 
 coincide with the decrees of the Synod, and thus define re- 
 probation : " It is the eternal decree of God, by which He 
 determined, in the most free will, not so far to have mercy 
 upon such a number of persons fallen in Adam, as efficaciously 
 to snatch them, through Christ, from a state of misery, and 
 lead them infallibly to salvation." 
 
 Conf. March, art. 14 (German) : This is the most blessed of 
 all the articles, as that on which not only do all the others 
 rest, but our salvation is mostly based : that, namely, the 
 Almighty God, out of pure grace and mercy, without any 
 regard to human worthiness, before the world was, ordained 
 and elected to eternal salvation all who perseveringly believe 
 in Christ ; that He knoweth all who are His, loved them from 
 eternity, and therefore gives them in pure mercy saving faith 
 and stedfast perseverance, so that none can pluck them out of 
 the hand of Christ, or separate them from the Father's love ; 
 that all things good and evil must work their advantage, 
 because they are the called according to His purpose. Of 
 no man's salvation is it to be doubted, so long as the means 
 of grace are used, because none can know when God will 
 mightily call His own. We reject all who hold that God, 
 propter fidem prccvisam, on account of the faith which He 
 foresaw, elected some, which is a Pelagian error. (That this 
 Confession does not sustain the extreme particularism of 
 Calvin is pretty generally acknowledged. The negative 
 God did not choose the elect propter fidem prcevisam, which is 
 expressly reckoned a Pelagian error we must not misunder- 
 stand. The propter does not allow us to think of it as 
 opposed to Lutheran dogma.) 
 
 II. ANTI-PREDESTINARIAN SYMBOLS. 
 I. ARMINIAN. 
 
 Art. Remonstr. 1 : Deum aeterno immutabili decreto in Jesu 
 Christo filio suo ante jactmn mundi fundamentum statuisse, ex 
 lapso, peccatis obnoxio humano genere illos in Christo, propter 
 Christum et per Christum servare, qui Spiritus sancti gratia 
 in eundem ejus filium credunt et in ea fideique obedientia per
 
 170 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 eandem gratiam in finein perseverant : contra vero eos, qui 
 non convertuntur, et infideles in peccato et irae subjectos relin- 
 quere et condemnare, tanquam a Christo alienos, secundum 
 illud evangelii Joh. iii. 36, qui credit in filium, habet vitam 
 seternam, qui vero filio non assentitur, non videbit vitam 
 seternam, sed ira dei manet super eum. Art. 2: Proinde 
 Jesum Christum mundi servatorem pro omnibus et singulis 
 mortuum esse atque ita quidem, ut omnibus per mortem 
 Christi reconciliationem et peccatorum remissionem impetra- 
 verit, ei tamen conditione, ut nemo ilia remissione peccatorum 
 re ipsa fruatur praeter hominem fidelem, et hoc quoque 
 secundum evangelium. 
 
 Conf. Hem. xvii. 3: Est vocatio efficax ab eventu potius, 
 quam a sol& intentione dei sic dicta, quse sciL effectum suum 
 salutarem reips& sortitur, non quidem idcirco, quod ex praecisa 
 salvandi intentione per singularem et arcanam quandam dei 
 sapientiam sic administretur, ut fructuose congruat voluntati 
 ejus, qui vocatur, neque quod in ea emcaciter per potentiam 
 irresistibilem aut vim quantam omnipotentem voluntas ejus, 
 qui vocatur, ad credendum ita determinetur, ut non possit non 
 credere et obedire cet. 
 
 Ib. xvii 7: Gratiam divinam aspernari et respuere ejusque 
 operationi resistere homo potest, ita ut se ipsum, cum divinitus 
 ad fidem et obedientiam vocatur, inidoneum reddere queat ad 
 credendum et divines voluntati obediendum ; . . . irresistibilis 
 enim gratia sive vis ejusmodi, quse actum ipsum fidei atque 
 obedientise eo modo efficiat, ut ea" posita homo non possit non 
 credere atque obedire, illic certe adhiberi non potest, nisi 
 prorsus inepte atque insipienter, ubi obedientia libera serio 
 mandatur. 8 : Etsi vero maxima est gratiae disparitas, tamen 
 Spiritus sanctus omnibus et singulis, quibus verbum fidei 
 ordinarie praedicatur, tantum gratiae confert aut saltern conferre 
 paratus est, quantum ad fidem ingenerandum et ad promoven- 
 dum suis gradibus salutarem ipsorum conversionem sufficit. 
 Itaque gratia sufficiens non tantum iis obtingit, qui actu 
 credunt et convertuntur, sed etiam iis, qui actu ipso non 
 credunt, nee re ipsa convertuntur. Quoscunque enim deus 
 vocat ad fidem et salutem, eos serio vocat, ... ita ut nullum 
 absolutae reprobationis aut impromeritae indurationis decretum
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE : PREDESTINATION. iVl 
 
 del istam prsecedere unquam voluerit. Of. vii. 4 : Tenendum 
 est, deum benignissimum isti general! malo (peccato orig.) 
 gratuitum in filio suo dilecto J. C. remedium omnibus prse- 
 parasse, ut vel hinc noxius illorum error satis appareat, qui 
 decretum absolutse reprobationis ab ipsis confictum in isto 
 peccato fundare solent. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Remonstr. p. 102 : Decretum vocant Eemon- 
 strantes decretum prsedestinationis ad salutem, quia eo 
 decernitur, qua" ratione et conditione deus peccatores saluti 
 destinet. Emmtiatur autem hoc decretum dei hac formal^: 
 deus decrevit salvare credentes, non quasi credentes quidam 
 re ipsa jam sint, qui objiciantur deo prsedestinanti, sed ut, quid 
 in iis, circa quos deus prsedestinans versatur, requiratur, clare 
 significetur. Tantundem enim valet atque si diceres, deus 
 decrevit homines salvare sub conditione fidei. . . . Etiamsi 
 hujusmodi prsedestinatio non sit prsedestinatio certarum perso- 
 narum, est tamen omnium hominum prsedestinatio, si modo 
 credant, et in virtute prsedestinatio certarum personarum, quse 
 et quando credunt. Ex vi enim prsedestinationis ejusmodi 
 generalis prsedestinati ab seterno censeri possunt, quicunque 
 in tempore credunt. . . . Etsi decretum istud de facto nullas 
 certas personas prsedestinet vel segreget (hoc enim fieri non 
 potest, nisi intercedat divina scientia), tamen decreti ipsius 
 natura talis est, ut ex vi ejus, quia generale est, prsedestinati 
 censeri debeant, quotquot in tempore conditionem praestant, 
 adeo ut etiam, si nulla intercederet divina prsescientia, recte 
 dici posset ab seterno prsedestinatos esse in vi generalis istius 
 decreti divini, quo deus credentes salvare constituit, quotquot 
 in tempore credunt. 
 
 II. p. 53: Non mirum est, Kemonstrantes doctrinam istam 
 Calvin, (de absol. prsedest.) rejecisse et quse ex ea consequuntur, 
 impietates ac blasphemias damnasse ex professo. Istud ut 
 facerent, gravissimas causas habebant, nam sententia ista 
 hseretica Calvini jam nota erat vel pueris . . . patroni ejus 
 non damnaverant tantum contrariam veritatem, sed etiam 
 intolerabilem in ecclesiis suis judicaverant cet. Istam senten- 
 tiam ut coloribus suis ad vivum depingerent Eem., necessarium 
 erat, idque eo magis, quod earn, prout jacet, pestem credant et 
 venenum religionis omnis, cum qua forte hseresis nulla alia
 
 172 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 comparari mereatur et tamen nihilominus earn ut fundamentum 
 religionis paene totius christianse statui ac propugnari videant. 
 Of. Episcop. Inst. Theol. iv. 5; CurcelL Inst. vL; limborch, 
 Th. Ch. iv. It has been common among the Arminians to 
 distinguish vocation, as universal and sufficient, from election. 
 The latter belongs to the converted believers, inasmuch as they 
 are separated from the profane crowd of the condemned. Vid. 
 Conf. Remonst xvii. 2. 
 
 II. LUTHERAN. 
 
 As to the early judgments of Luther and Melanchthon on 
 predestination, and the part taken by the latter against Calvin, 
 and the history of this dogma in the Lutheran Church down 
 to the Form. Cone., see Planck, Prot. Lehrb. ii 134. 
 
 F. C. p. 6 1 7 : Primum omnium est, quod accurate observari 
 oportet, discrimen esse inter prsescientiam et prsedestinationem 
 sive seternam electionem del Praescientia enim dei nihil aliud 
 est, quam quod deus omnia noverit, antequam fiant. Haec 
 dei prsescientia simul ad bonos et malos pertinet, sed interim 
 non est causa mali neque est causa peccati, quse hominem ad 
 scelus impellat. Peccatum enim ex diabolo et ex hominis 
 prava et mala voluntate oritur, neque haec dei praescientia causa 
 est, quod homines pereant, hoc enim sibi ipsis imputare debent. 
 Sed praescientia dei disponit malum et metas illi constituit, 
 quousque progredi et quam diu durare debeat, idque eo dirigit, 
 ut, licet per se malum sit, nihilominus electis dei ad salutem 
 cedat 
 
 Tb. p. 618: Praedestinatio vero seu seterna dei electio 
 tantum ad bonos et dilectos filios dei pertinet, et haec est causa 
 ipsorum salutis. Etenim eorum salutem procurat et ea, quae 
 ad ipsam pertinent, disponit. Haec dei praedestinatio non in 
 arcano dei consilio est scrutanda, sed in verbo dei, in quo 
 revelatur, quaerenda est. Verbum autem dei deducit nos ad 
 Christum, . . . Christus vero omnes peccatores ad se vocat et 
 promittit illis levationem et serio vult, ut omnes homines ad 
 se veniant et sibi consuli et subveniri sinant. His sese re- 
 demtorem in verbo offert et vult, ut verbum audiatur et ut 
 aures non obdurentur nee verbum negligatur et contemnatur.
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GKACE : PREDESTINATION. 173 
 
 Et promittit, se largiturum virtutem et operationem Spiritus 
 sancti et auxilium divinum, ut in fide constantes permaneamus, 
 ut vitam seternam consequamur. P. 803: Deus illo suo con- 
 silio (electionis), proposito et ordinatione non tantum in genere 
 salutem suorum procuravit, verum etiam omnes et singulas 
 personas electorum, qui per Ch. salvandi sunt, clementer prse- 
 scivit, ad salutem elegit et decrevit, quod eo modo, quern jam 
 recitavimus, per suam gratiam, dona atque efficaciam salutis 
 set. participes facere, juvare, eorum salutem promovere, ipsos 
 confirmare et conservare velit. 
 
 /&. p. 619: Vera igitur sententia de praedestinatione ex 
 evangelio Christi discenda est. In eo enim perspicue docetur, 
 quod deus omnes sub incredulitatem concluserit, ut omnium 
 misereatur, et quod nolit quemquam perire, sed potius ut omnes 
 convertantur et in Christum credant. Quod vero scriptum 
 est (Matt. xxii. 14), multos quidem vocatos, paucos vero 
 electos esse, non ita accipiendum est, quasi deus nolit, ut omnes 
 salventur, sed damnationis impiorum causa est, quod verbum 
 dei aut prorsus non audiant, sed contumaciter contemnant, 
 aures obdurent et cor indurent, et hoc modo Spiritui sancto 
 viam ordinariam prsecludant, ut opus suum in eis efficere 
 nequeat, aut certe quod verbum auditum flocci pendant atque 
 abjiciant. Quod igitur pereunt, neque deus neque ipsius 
 electio, sed malitia eorum in culpa est. 
 
 [The link between prescience and predestination the other 
 Lutherans find in 2 Thess. iL 13 and 1 Pet. i. 2. Jo. Gerhard, 
 Loci, ed. E. Preuss, ii 86 B: Illos omnes et solos ab seterno 
 a deo ad salutem electos esse dicimus, quos efficacia Spiritus 
 sancti per ministerium evangelii in Christum redemtorem vere 
 credituros et in fide usque ad vitse finem permansuros prse- 
 vidit ; and J. A. Osiander, Collegium theol. system, Stutgardise 
 1686, 4, vi. 122 B: Electi sumus secundum praescientiam 
 dei E. Electio nostra nititur prasnotione fidei nee absoluta, 
 sed facta cum respectu ad applicationem correlativam medi- 
 orum gratiae.] 
 
 III. SOCINIAN AND MENNONITE. 
 
 Cat. Roc. qu. 435: Ea de predestinations dei sententia
 
 174 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 (quod deus ab seterno certos quosdam nominatim homines ad 
 salutem, alios ad damnationem elegerit) prorsus fallax est, id 
 vero duas ob causas potissimum, quanun una est, quod totam 
 religionem corruere esset necesse ; altera, quod deo multa in- 
 convenientia attribui oporteret. 
 
 Ib. 440 : Praedestinatio dei in scripturis aliud nihil notat, 
 quam dei ante conditum mundum de hominibus decretum 
 ejusmodi, quod iis, qui in ipsum crederent eique obedirent, 
 daturus esset vitam aeternam, eos vero, qui in eum credere et 
 ei parere recusarent, aetern& damnatione puniturus esset. Quod 
 hinc apparet, quod Christus, divinae voluntatis perfectus inter- 
 pres, ita hoc dei consilium atque decretum nobis exposuerit : 
 eum, qui in ipsum crederet, vitam aeternam certo habiturum 
 esse ; qui vero non crederet, eum certo condemnation iri. 
 Cf. qu. 914, and Socin. Prcelect. theol. c. 6 sqq. 
 
 Eis, Conf. art. 7 : Nullam creaturam praedestinavit (deus), 
 ordinavit aut creavit, ut condemnaretur, nee voluit nee de- 
 crevit, ut peccarent aut in peccatis viverent, ut eas condem- 
 nationi subjiceret. Sed . . . omnes decrevit et creavit ad 
 salutem, . . . inque Christo ordinavit et praeparavit omnibus 
 medicinam vitas. . . . Qui oblatam gratiam dedignantur aut 
 respuunt in impcenitentia et incredulitate, se ipsos per istam 
 malitiam salutis reddunt indignos atque ideo . . . frustrantur isto 
 fine, ad quern creati et in Christo erant destinati et vocati. 
 
 IV. EOMAN AND GREEK. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. justificat. can. 17: Si quis justifica- 
 tionis gratiam non nisi prsedestinatis ad vitam contingere 
 dixerit, reliquos vero omnes, qui vocantur, vocari quidem sed 
 gratiam non accipere, utpote divina potestate praedestinatos ad 
 malum : anathema sit. Cf. Bellarmin, De gratia, lib. 2. 
 
 Later, the Eomish Church rejected predestination in Jan- 
 senism yet more decisively. 
 
 [Propositiones quinque Cornelii Jansenii ex ejus libro 
 Augustinus excerptae, damnatae ab Innocentio x., ab Alexandro 
 VII., Clemente XL Propositio quinta: " Semipelagianum est 
 dicere, Christum pro omnibus omnino hominibus mortuum 
 esse aut sanguinem fudisse," damnata uti falsa, temeraria,
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GKACE : PKEDESTINATION. 175 
 
 scandalosa et, intellecta eo sensu ut Christus pro salute dum- 
 taxat praedestinatorum mortuus sit, impia, blasphema, con- 
 tumeliosa, divinee pietati derogans et heeretica. Denzinger, 
 Enchiridion, S. 316, 317.] 
 
 Cf. Walch, Eeligionsstreit. ausser der Luther. Kirche, i. 233 
 ff., ii. 855 ff.; Schrockh, KG. nacfi der Eef. iv. 309 ft, vii. 
 375 ff. Of the Greek Conff., that of Metrop. Critop. alone 
 contains the question, and only in one chapter, of which this 
 is the sum : 
 
 Metr. Critop. p. 6 7 : Tlaa-iv ovv rocs TK> (frvaifcw </>&m ev 
 Kara \6>yov %pa) pivots, TOVTOIS o TravdyaOos $609 eTTiXa/iTret KOI 
 TO TTvevftaTiKov <<W9' rovrecmv, eTravdjet, avrois rrjv rovrov 
 KOL KaOeKTLfcrjv Bvva/jLiv r)V d,7rca\ecrav, /cat TO Trepl 
 avre^ovcrtov ijSr) veKpo>6ev rfj Trapaftdcrei dvicmjcri, rfj 
 avrov %dpiTi. Ou? Kal rrplv TOVTO iroiriaai irpo<yiv(acrKei TOVTO 
 s, real et? dyaObv TeXo? TOUTOV? 'jrpowpL^ei, /cal vrpo? 
 tca\ei Sia TOV d<yiov Tn/ev/zaro?, real SIKCUOC TK> rov fiovo- 
 yevovs ai^ari,, KOI So|aei rf) avrov %dpiTi. P. 68 : Ov Svvd- 
 fteOa Se elTretv, Tovrtov rwv arjaQwv CUTIOV rrjv pera \6yov 
 %prjcrtv TOV (frvcriKov <f)K>ro<s' ov <yap Trapa TOVTO TOi? crvv ~\,d<yq) 
 TO) efjb(J3VT(i> v6/J,q> xpco/Aevots, o(f>ei\i o ^09 
 dyaOa Sovvcu, a\Xa (frpovi/jios wv ov /3ov\TO rots 
 KaTaxpio/uevois TU> <f)v<ruc(p {jjmrl TO irvev^ariKov ^>W 
 reva-ai. P. 70 : ToO (j,ev <yap a7r\w9 edeXeiv avrov fj,era8io~6vat 
 rial T^9 eavrov ^dpiro<f alriav fiovrjv ~\,e<yofj,ev rrjv avrov dja- 
 Oortjra' rov Se fjirj rovroi?, aXXa rovrois, vrpwrrj fiev Kal fjieyla-rrj 
 earlv *) rov Oeov (frpovvjo-is /cal ao<j>ia } f) irdvra <ro<w9 ol/covo- 
 fj,ov<ra, Sevrepa Be, TO rwv \ajjL^avovro)v SetCTifcoV Kal trepl OVK 
 oiKodev TOVTO e^ei, TO lo-^vov TOCTOVTOV, ware KOI eT 
 7T/309 eauTO T rr)\iKavra fte<yd\a Kal aiwvia TOV 6eov 
 aXXa rfi Kivov <70^>ta Kal dyaOoTrjTi eBo^ev elvai rt. 
 
 Cf. Dosithei Confess, c. 3. 
 
 V. QUAKER 
 
 The Quakers maintain the universality of the enlightenment 
 proceeding from Christ so thoroughly, that they suppose even 
 those who without their fault never heard of the historical 
 Christ are under the influence of that grace.
 
 176 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. 6 : Therefore Christ hath tasted death 
 for every man not only for all kinds of men, as some vainly 
 talk, but for every man of all kinds the benefit of whose 
 offering is not only extended to such who have the distinct 
 outward knowledge of His death and sufferings, as the same 
 is declared in the Scriptures, but even unto those who are 
 necessarily excluded from the benefit of this knowledge by 
 some inevitable accident, which knowledge we willingly con- 
 fess to be very profitable and comfortable, but not absolutely 
 needful unto such from whom God Himself hath withheld it ; 
 yet they may be made partakers of the mystery of His death, 
 though ignorant of the history, if they suffer His seed and 
 light, enlightening their hearts, to take place, in which light 
 communion with the Father and the Son is enjoyed, so as of 
 wicked men to become holy, and lovers of that power, by 
 whose inward and secret touches they feel themselves turned 
 from the evil to the good, and learn to do to others as they 
 would be done by, in which Christ Himself affirms all to be 
 included. As they have then falsely and erroneously taught, 
 who have denied Christ to have died for all men, so neither 
 have they sufficiently taught the truth, who, affirming Him 
 to have died for all, have added the absolute necessity of 
 the outward knowledge thereof in order to obtain its saving 
 effect. ... As for that doctrine which these propositions chiefly 
 strike at, to wit, absolute reprobation, according to which some 
 are not afraid to assert " that God, by an eternal and immut- 
 able decree, hath predestinated to eternal damnation the far 
 greater part of mankind, not considered as made, much less as 
 fallen, without any respect to their disobedience or sin, but 
 only for the demonstrating of the glory of His justice ; and 
 that, for the bringing this about, He hath appointed these 
 miserable souls necessarily to walk in their wicked ways, that 
 so His justice may lay hold on them; and that God doth 
 therefore not only suffer them to be liable to this misery in 
 many parts of the world, by withholding from them the 
 preaching of the gospel and the knowledge of Christ, but even 
 in those places where the gospel is preached, and salvation by 
 Christ is offered, whom, though He publicly invite them, yet 
 He justly condemns for disobedience, albeit He hath with-
 
 UNIVERSALITY OF GRACE : PREDESTINATION. 
 
 held from them all grace, by which they could have laid hold 
 of the gospel, viz. because He hath by a secret will, unknown 
 to all men, ordained and decreed (without any respect had to 
 their obedience or sin) that they shall not obey, and that the 
 offer of the gospel shall never prove effectual for their salva- 
 tion, but only serve to aggravate and occasion their greater 
 condemnation ;" I say, as to this horrible and blasphemous 
 doctrine, our cause is common with many others, who have 
 both wisely and learnedly, according to Scripture, reason, and 
 antiquity, refuted it. [Accordingly, the resistibility of divine 
 grace, as offered to man, is repeatedly asserted.] As the grace 
 and light in all is sufficient to save all, and of its own nature 
 would save all, so it strives and wrestles with all, in order to 
 save them. He that resists its striving is the cause of his 
 own condemnation ; he that resists it not, it becomes his 
 salvation. So that in him that is saved, the working is of 
 the grace, and not of the man. 
 
 M
 
 X. 
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WOKKS. 
 
 FIRST POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 THE result of return to God under the influence of the Holy 
 Ghost is justification. This is admitted by all Confessions ; but 
 they differ among themselves, partly in the definition of the 
 very idea of justification, partly in the decision of the point 
 in conversion at which justification follows as a consequence, 
 and consequently of the strict condition under which it is 
 imparted. As it respects the notion of justification, Pro- 
 testants generally understand by it the absolution of a sinner 
 in the sight of God, on the ground of the merit of Christ, and 
 the imputation to faith of the righteousness of Christ. The 
 Romanists, on the other hand, add to the forgiveness of sins 
 sanctification also, that is, the internal change of the sinner 
 into a righteous person, or a divine infusion of habitual right- 
 eousness, which makes the man capable of securing his salva- 
 tion by good works. To the former, justification is an actus 
 forensis ; to the latter, an adits physicus, or hyper-physicus. 
 With the Eomanists on this point are ranged the Mennonites 
 and the Quakers ; whereas the Arminians and the Socinians, 
 with Protestants generally, limit justification to the forgive- 
 ness of sins. 1 
 
 1 The Greek symbols never define justification. Kirpinski, Comp. orth. theol. : 
 consistit forma justif. in remiss, pecc. et in mutatione hominis ex peccatore in 
 justum 
 
 178
 
 JUSTIFICATION : FAITH, WOKKS. 179 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. KOHAN, MENNONITE, AND QUAKEK. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi cap. 7 : Justificatio non est sola pecca- 
 torum remissio, sed et sanctificatio et renovatio interioris 
 hominis per voluntariam susceptionem gratite et donorum, 
 unde homo ex injusto fit Justus et ex inimico amicus, ut sit 
 heres secundum spem vitse seternse . . . justitia del, qu& nos 
 justos facit, qua videlicet ab eo donati renovamur spiritu 
 mentis nostrse et non modo reputamur, sed vere justi nomi- 
 namur et sumus, justitiam in nobis recipientes. . . . Quan- 
 quam nemo possit esse Justus, nisi cui merita passionis J. C. 
 communicantur, id tamen in hac impii justificatione fit, dum 
 ejusdem sanct. passionis merito per Spiritum s. caritas dei 
 diffunditur in cordibus eorum, qui justificantur, atque ipsis 
 inhaeret, unde in ipsa justificatione cum remissione peccatorum 
 hsec omnia simul infusa accipit homo per J. Ch., cui inseritur, 
 fidem, spem et caritatem. Cf, cap. 4. 
 
 Cf. can. 1 1 ; Bellarmin, De justific. ii. 2 sqq. ; Bossuet, 
 Expos, c. 6 ; Becan. Man. Controv. i. 16, 17. 
 
 On the relation of forgiveness to the Eoman idea of 
 justification, thus Bellarmin : Non potest haec translatio (in 
 statum adoptionis filiorum dei) fieri, nisi homo per remis- 
 sionem peccati desinat esse impius et per infusionem justi- 
 tise incipiat esse pius. Sed sicut aer cum illustratur a sole 
 per idem lumen, quod recipit, desinit esse tenebrosus et incipit 
 esse lucidus : sic etiam homo per eandem justitiam sibi a 
 sole justitise donatam atque infusam desinit esse injustus, 
 delente videlicet lumine gratiee tenebras peccatorum cet. 
 
 Eis, Conf. art. 21 : Per vivam fidem acquirimus veram 
 justitiam i. e. condonationem seu remissionem omnium tarn 
 prseteritorum quam prsesentium peccatorum, ut et veram 
 justitiam, quse per Jesum co-operante Spiritu sancto abun- 
 danter in nos effunditur vel infunditur, adeo ut ex malis . - . 
 fiamus boni atque ita ex injustis revera justi. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. vii. 3 : We understand not by this justifica- 
 tion by Christ, barely the good works even wrought by the 
 Spirit of Christ, for they, as Protestants truly affirm, are rather
 
 180 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 an effect of justification than the cause of it ; but we under- 
 stand the formation of Christ in us, Christ born and brought 
 forth in us, from which good works as naturally proceed as 
 fruit from a fruitful tree. It is this inward birth in us, 
 bringing forth righteousness and holiness in us, that doth 
 justify us, which, having removed and done away the contrary 
 nature and spirit that did bear rule and bring condemnation, 
 now is in dominion over all in our hearts. Those, then, that 
 come to know Christ thus formed in them, do enjoy Him 
 wholly and undivided. [The whole section presses home the 
 point that justification is a real internal renovation of mind ; 
 and the declarative sense of justification is absolutely rejected. 
 The connection with forgiveness of sins is thus given.] The 
 obedience, sufferings, and death of Christ, is that by which 
 the soul obtains remission of sins, and is the procuring cause 
 of that grace, by whose inward workings Christ comes to be 
 formed inwardly, and the soul to be made conformable unto 
 Him, and so just and justified. Comp. Prop, vii. 8. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 . Apol. A. C. p. 73 : Quia justificari significat ex injustis 
 justos efiici seu regenerari, significat et justos pronuntiari seu 
 reputari; utroque em'm modo loquitur scriptura. Ideo pri- 
 mum volumus hoc ostendere, quod sola fides ex injusto justum 
 efficiat, hoc est accipiat remissionem peccatorum cet. Again : 
 consequi remissionem peccatorum est justificari; and p. 109 : 
 Justificari hie significat non, ex impio justum effici, sed usu 
 forensi : justum pronuntiari 
 
 Hid, p. 125 : Justificare L L (Bom. v. 1), forensi consue- 
 tudine significat reum absolvere et pronuntiare justum, sed 
 propter alienam justitiam, videlicet Christi, quse aliena justitia 
 communicatur nobis per fidem. C Conf. Saxon, p. 58 sqq. 
 
 F. G. p. 685 : Vocabulum justificationis in hoc negotio sig- 
 nificat justum pronuntiare, a peccatis et seternis peccatoram 
 suppliciis absolvere propter justitiam Christi, quse a deo fidei 
 imputatur. Et sane hie vocabuli illius usus tarn in V., quam 
 in N. T. admodum frequens est (Prov. xvii. 15 ; Isa. v. 23 ; 
 Rom. viii 33).
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WOKKS. 181 
 
 Helv. ii. cap. 1 5 : Justificare significat apostolo (Paulo) in 
 disputatione de justificatione peccata remittere, a culpa et 
 poena absolvere, in gratiam recipere et justum pronuntiare. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 18 : In sola Ch. obedientia prorsus acquies- 
 cimus, quse quidem nobis imputatur, turn ut tegantur omnia 
 nostra peccata, turn etiam ut gratiam coram deo nanciscamur. 
 
 Conf. Bern, xviii. 3 : Justificatio est : peccatoris vere resipi- 
 scentis ac credentis per et propter Christum vera fide appre- 
 hensum misericors et quidem plenaria coram deo ab omni 
 reatu absolutio sive gratuita peccatorum omnium per veram 
 fidem in Jes. Ch. obtenta remissio. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Bern. p. 112 a : Justificatio est actio dei, quam 
 deus pure pute in sua ipsius mente efficit, quia nihil aliud est, 
 quam volitio aut decretum, quo peccata remittere et justitiam 
 imputare aliquando vult iis, qui credunt i. e. quo vult poenas 
 peccatis eorum promeritas iis non infligere eosque tanquam 
 justos tractare et prasmio ameer e. 
 
 Cat. Racov. qu. 453 : Justificatio est, cum nos deus pro jus- 
 tis habet, quod ea ratione facit, cum nobis et peccata remittit 
 et nos vita seterna donat. 
 
 Cf. F. Socin. Prcelcct. theol. c. 15, and tract, de justific. 
 (Opp. i p. 602.) Ostorodt, Unterricht. c. 36, S. 296. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 1. [In evangelical doctrine justification is an act, an act of God; 
 according to the Roman doctrine, it is a process. But the Evan- 
 gelical Church does not teach that the act of justification occurs 
 once only in the life of a man, as it were in baptism, or the so-called 
 great conversion. It teaches that it is daily necessary. Form. 
 Cone. p. 692. Further, justification, in the evangelical doctrine, is 
 a judicial act; according to Rome, it is the communication or 
 impartation of a substance.] The Romish Church teaches that 
 there are degrees of justification (alter justior altero). Cone. Trid. 
 sess, vi. 10. 
 
 2. The relation of justification, objectively, to the merits of Christ 
 is defined by this, that justification is in some sense an imputation 
 of the righteousness of Christ (F. C. p. 584). [Jo. Gerhard, Loci, 
 ed. E. Preuss, iii. 501 A B : Quam vis enim meritum Christi nobis 
 inhserere non possit, ut Bellarminus scribit, tamen nobis a Deo im- 
 putari potest, sicut Christo mediator! imputata sunt peccata nostra ;
 
 182 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 utrumque igitur justitiae Christi tribuimus, quod sit causa justificationis 
 meritoria et quod sit causa ejusdem formalis, nimirum ratione appli- 
 cationis, quatenus per fidem nobis imputatur.] The Romanists con- 
 sistently reject this definition, Cone. Trid. sess. vi. can. 11 ; Bellar- 
 min, De justiftc. ii. 7 sqq. and thus teach, in accordance with their 
 doctrine of justificatio, Trid. sess. vi. cap. 7 : Chr. su& sanctissima" pas- 
 sione nobis justificationem meruit (cf. Becani Manuale controv. i. 16. 
 9) ; and the communicatio meriti Ch. is thus explained : Dum per 
 Sp. s. caritas dei diffunditur in cordibus eorum, qui justificantur cet. ; 
 or as Bossuet, c. vi., says : Justitia Ch. non imputatur tan turn fideli- 
 bus, sed actu ac reips& Sp. s. operatione communicatur, ut ejus gratia 
 non justi tantum reputentur, sed fiant. Cf. Bellarmin, Justific. ii. 3, 
 and Dosithei Confess, c. xiii. The antithesis to the Protestant imputa- 
 tion theory is thus briefly expressed : In justificatione peccata non 
 teguntur tantum, sed tolluntur vere s. Becani Manual, i. p. 225. In 
 another sense Arminians deny the imputatio justitiae Christi. CurcelL 
 Ed. chr. instit. via. 9. 6: Nullibi docet scriptura, justitiam Chr. nobis im- 
 putari. Et id absurdum est. Nemo enim in se injustus aliena justitia 
 potest esse fonnaliter Justus, non magis, quam aliena albedine _<Ethiops 
 esse albus cf. vii. 1. 7. Apol. Conf. Remonstr. p. 112 b : Remonstran- 
 tes phrasin illam: Chr. justitiam nobis imputari in declaratione sua 
 non usurparunt, non, quod earn benigna interpretatione in commo- 
 dum sensum flecti non posse credant, sed quod si rigide accipiatur, 
 consistere non possit cum ilia", quse propria est ecclesiarum reform, 
 sententia, qua! justitia nobis imputari dicitur propter Chr. meritum et 
 obedientiam. Nam si utramque in rigore velimus esse veram, necesse 
 est ut dicanms, justitiam Ch. nobis imputari propter justitiam Ch., 
 quae locutio . . . manifestam in sese habet absurditatem. We should 
 say, imputatur nobis justitia ; but this consists (Limborch, Theol. chr. 
 vi. 4. 17) in the fact that God credentem in filium suum, licet antea 
 peccatorem et impium, nunc autem resipiscentem et per fidem opera 
 poenitentia digna producentem, eo loco reputat, ac si perfecte Justus 
 esset, . . . ac proinde eum ut talem tractare vult. It is at the same 
 time clear from this, that the Arminian opposition to the imputation 
 of Christ's righteousness springs from their divergent doctrine, not of 
 justification, but of its ground. 
 
 The Socinians, though they teach no satisfaction, consistently reject 
 the imputation of His righteousness. Justification springs from the 
 sheer grace of God, who pardons those who believe in Christ, and 
 obey. Barclay, ApoL vii. 2, shows how and why the Quakers reject 
 this imputation. 
 
 3. The forgiveness of sins which is bestowed through the applica- 
 tion of the merits of Christ, extends, in Protestant doctrine, to the 
 guilt and all the punishment of sin. In Roman doctrine this com- 
 prehensive pardon is granted only in baptism: in the renewal of
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WORKS. 183 
 
 justification in penance, only the guilt and eternal punishment of sin 
 are remitted ; the temporal punishments of sin must be expiated by 
 Christians themselves. When, in either of these systems, forgive- 
 ness of sins is spoken of, we must understand original sin and actual 
 transgressions. On the other hand, those systems which deny the 
 reality of original sin refer forgiveness, of course, only to the per- 
 sonal sins of each individual. 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 The standards agree that justification comes to man through 
 Christ; but the manner of the appropriation is variously 
 stated. Eome teaches that through man's faith, penitence, 
 resolution of amendment, God is moved to infuse into one 
 thus disposed justification, and with it the power to merit 
 for himself by good works increase of grace and eternal life. 
 [The evangelical church, on the contrary, teaches that the 
 righteousness of Christ is laid hold on by the sinner, and calls 
 this simple energy faith. Thus it is not our faith for the 
 sake of which we are declared righteous, but Christ. Faith 
 is only the means, the only one it is true, by which the 
 righteousness of the God-man is applied. If a sinner is thus 
 for the sake of the merit of Christ justified, then all the rest 
 love, and hope, and good works necessarily follow.] Finally, 
 the Greek and the Socinians, the Arminians and the Men- 
 nonites, occupying a middle place, would have faith and works 
 unitedly (fides dbsequiosa) the condition of righteousness. But 
 the two latter parties reject absolutely all meritoriousness in 
 the good works. 
 
 I. EOMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 6 : Disponuntur ad ipsam justitiam, 
 dum excitati divina gratia et adjuti fidem ex auditu concipientes 
 libere moventur in deum, credentes vera esse, quas divinitus 
 revelata et promissa sunt, atque illud inprimis, a deo justifi- 
 cari impium per gratiam ejus, . . . et dum, peccatores se esse
 
 184 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 intelligentes, a divinae justitise timore, quo utiliter concutiun- 
 tur, ad considerandum del misericordiam se convertendo in 
 spem eriguntur, fidentes, deum sibi propter Christum propitium 
 fore, illumque tanquam omnis justitiae fontem diligere incipiunt 
 ac propterea moventur adversus peccata per odium aliquod et 
 detestationem. C. 7 : Hanc dispositionem s. praeparationem 
 justificatio ipsa consequitur cet. 1 See for what follows, above, I. 
 C. 10 : Sic justificati et amici dei facti, euntes de virtute in 
 virtutem renovantur de die in diem, h. e. mortificando membra 
 carnis suae et exhibendo ea arma justitiae in sanctificationem 
 per observationem mandatorum dei et ecclesiae in ipsa justitia 
 per Ch. gratiam accepta, co-operante fide bonis operibus crescunt 
 atque magis justificantur cet. Can. 32 : Si quis dixerit, jus- 
 tificatum bonis operibus, quae ab eo per dei gratiam et J. Ch. 
 meritum, cujus vivum membrum est, fiunt, non vere mereri 
 augmentum gratiae, vitam aet. et ipsius vitae aet., si tamen in 
 gratiS. decesserit, consecutionem atque etiam gloriae augmen- 
 tum, anath. sit. 
 
 Ibid. cap. 8 : Per fidem ideo justificari dicimur, quia fides 
 est humanae salutis initium, fundamentum et radix omnis jus- 
 tificationis. 
 
 Ibid. cap. 9 : Quamvis necessarium sit credere, neque re- 
 mitti neque remissa unquam fuisse peccata, nisi gratis divina 
 misericordia propter Christum, . . . tamen non illud asseren- 
 dum est, . . . neminem a peccatis absolvi ac justificari, nisi 
 eum, qui certo credat se absolutum et justification esse, atque 
 hoc sold fide dbsolutionem et justificationem perfici. 
 
 Ibid. can. 9 : Si quis dixerit, sola fide impium justificari, 
 ita ut intelligat nihil aliud requiri, quod ad justificationis 
 gratiam consequendam co-operetur, . . . anathema sit. Can. 
 12 : Si quis dix., fidem justificantem nihil aliud esse, quam 
 fiduciam divinae misericordiae peccata remittentis propter Chris- 
 tum, vel earn fiduciam solam esse, quS. justificamur, anathema 
 sit. Can. 14: Si quis dix., hominem a peccatis absolvi ac 
 justificari ex eo, quod se absolvi ac justificari certo credat, aut 
 
 1 Bellarmin, Justif. i. 12 : Synod. Trid. septem actus enumerat, quibus im- 
 pii ad justitiam disponuntur, videl. fidei, timoris, spei, dilectionis, pcenitentise 
 propositi snscipiendi sacrament! (baptismi) et propositi novae vitae atque observa- 
 tionis mandatorum dei. Cf. Becan. Man. controv. i. 17.
 
 JUSTIFICATION : FAITH, WORKS. 185 
 
 . . . hac sola fide absolutionem et justificationem perfici, 
 anathema sit. 
 
 Justification, the infusio justitise, is imparted gratuitously. 
 Trid. sess. vi. cap. 8 : gratis justificari ideo dicimus, quia nihil 
 eorum, quse justificationis gratiam prsecedunt, sive fides sive 
 opera, ipsam justificationis gratiam promeretur. But it is usual, 
 with the Eomish divines, to term man's self-disposal towards 
 justification a meritum ex congruo (Eng. Art. xiii.). Bellarmin, 
 Just, i 1 7, says : per fidem nos placere deo et impetrare atque 
 aliquo modo mereri justificationem. (The meritum ex operi- 
 bus is e condigno.) [And of the good works of the justified 
 the Council of Trent says expressly that they must be re- 
 garded as properly meritorious.] 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 A. C. art. 4 : Decent, quod homines non possint justificari 
 coram deo propriis viribus, meritis aut operibus, sed gratis 
 justificentur propter Christum per fidem, cum credunt, se in 
 gratiam recipi et peccata remitti propter Christum ; . . . hanc 
 fidem imputat deus pro justiti& coram ipso. 
 
 Apol. A. G. p. 6 7 : Cum justificatio contingat per gratuitam 
 promissionem, sequitur, quod non possimus non ipsi justificare, 
 alioqui quorsum opus erat promittere ? Cumque promissio 
 non possit accipi nisi fide, evang. . . . praedicat justitiam fidei 
 inChr. 
 
 Ib. p. 94: Sola" fide nos justificamur coram deo, quia sola, 
 fide accipimus remissionem peccatorum et reconciliationem, 
 propter Christum, quia reconciliatio seu justificatio est res 
 promissa propter Christum, non propter legem. S. Apol. 
 pp. 73-82 ; cf. A. Sm. p. 304. 
 
 F. C. p. 584: Confitemur, solam fidem esse illud medium 
 et instrumentum, quo Christum salvatorem et ita in Christo 
 justitiam illam, quse coram judicio dei consistere potest, appre- 
 hendimus. P. 689 : Neque contritio neque delectio neque 
 ulla alia virtus, sed sola fides est illud unicum medium et 
 instrumentum, quo gratiam dei, meritum Ch. et remissionem 
 peccatorum apprehendere et accipere possumus. Eecte etiam 
 dicitur, quod credentes, qui per fidem in Ch. justificati sunt,
 
 186 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 in hac vita primum quidem imputatam sibi justitiam, deinde 
 vero etiam inchoatam justitiam novae obedientiae s. bonorum 
 operum habeant. Sed hasc duo non inter se permiscenda aut 
 simul in articulum de justificatione fidei coram deo ingerenda 
 sunt. 
 
 A. G. p. 1 8 : Nomen fidei non significat tantum historiae 
 notitiam, qualis est in impiis et diabolo, sed significat fidem, 
 quae credit non tantum historiam sed etiam effectum historise, 
 videlicet hunc articulum, remissionem peccatorum cet. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 68 : Ilia fides, quae justificat, non est tantum 
 notitia historiae, sed est assentiri promissioni dei, in qua gratis 
 propter Christum offertur remissio peqcatorum et justificatio. 
 P. 69 : Quoties de fide justificante loquimur, sciendum est, 
 haec tria objecta concurrere, promissionem et quidem gratuitam 
 et merita Christi, tanquam pretium, et propitiationem Pro- 
 missio accipitur fide, gratuitum excludit nostra merita et sig- 
 nificat, tantum per TrniseriV.nTfHfl.Tn offend beneficium : Christi 
 merita sunt pretium, quia oportet esse aliquam certam propitia- 
 tionem pro peccatis nostris. P. *72 : Id autem est credere, 
 confidere mentis Christi, quod propter ipsum certo velit nobis 
 deus placatus esse. 
 
 Tb. p. 172: Adversarii, cum de fide loquuntur et dicunt, 
 earn praecedere pcenitentiam, intelligunt fidem non hanc, quae 
 justificat, sed quae in genere credit, deum esse, pcenas propo- 
 sitas esse impiis cet. Nos praeter illam fidem requirimus, ut 
 credat sibi quisque remitti peccata ; de hac fide speciali liti- 
 gamus, . . . haec fides ita sequitur terrores, ut vincat eos et 
 reddat pacatam conscientiam. 
 
 Cf. Apol. p. 131 ; F. G. pp. 585, 684. 
 
 Helv. il c. 15: Docemus cum apostolo, hominem pecca- 
 torem justificari sola fide in Christum ; . . . quia fides Chris- 
 tum justitiam nostram recipit et gratiae dei in Christo omnia 
 tribuit, jdeo fidei tribuitur justificatio, maxime propter Chris- 
 tum et non ideo, quia nostrum opus est. Donum enim dei 
 est. 
 
 Heidelb. Cat. Fr. 60: How art thou justified before God? 
 Only by a genuine faith in Jesus Christ, so that . . . God, 
 without any merit of mine, out of pure grace, gives and 
 reckons me the perfect satisfaction, righteousness, and holiness
 
 JUSTIFICATION : FAITH, WOEKS. 187 
 
 of Christ,, as if I had never contracted any sin, and had my- 
 self accomplished the obedience which Christ rendered for me. 
 Cf. 61. 
 
 Gonf. Gall. art. 20: Credimus, nos sola fide fieri justitiae 
 participes ; . . . hoc autem ideo fit, quod promissiones vitae 
 nobis in ipso (Christo) oblatse tune usui nostro applicantur et 
 nobis redduntur efficaces, cum eas amplectimur, nihil arnbi- 
 gentes nobis obventura, de quibus ore dei certiores fimus. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. xi. : We are accounted righteous before 
 God, only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, 
 by faith ; and not for our own works or deservings. Where- 
 fore, that we are justified by faith only is a most wholesome 
 doctrine, and very full of comfort, as more largely is expressed 
 in the Homily of Justification. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xi. sec. 1 : Those whom God effectually 
 calleth He also freely justifieth, not by infusing righteousness 
 into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting 
 and accepting their persons as righteous: not for anything 
 wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone : 
 not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other 
 evangelical obedience, to them as their righteousness ; but by 
 imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, 
 they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness by 
 faith : which faith they have not of themselves ; it is the gift 
 of God. Sec. 2 : Faith, thus receiving and resting on Christ 
 and His righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification ; 
 yet is it not alone in the person justified, but is ever accom- 
 panied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but 
 worketh by love. Sec. 3 : Christ, by His obedience and death, 
 did fully discharge the debt of all those that are thus justified, 
 and did make a proper, real, and full satisfaction to His Father's 
 justice in their behalf. 'Yet, inasmuch as He was given by 
 the Father for them, and His obedience and satisfaction ac- 
 cepted in their stead, and both freely, not for anything in 
 them, their justification is only of free grace ; that both the 
 exact justice and rich grace of God might be glorified in the 
 justification of sinners. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 22 : Credimus, . . . Spiritum sanctum veram 
 in cordibus nostris fidem accendere, quse Jesum Christum cum
 
 188 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 omnibus suis mentis amplectitur eumque suum ac sibi pro- 
 prium efficit nihilque amplius extra eum quaerit. Merito igi- 
 tiir cum Paulo dicimus, nos sola fide justificari seu fide absque 
 operibus. Interim proprie loquendo nequaquam intelligimus 
 ipsam fidem quae nos justificat ut quae sit duntaxat instrumen- 
 tum, quo Christum, justitiam nostram, apprehendimus. Cf. 
 Conf. Anhalt. 3. 
 
 Helv. ii. c. 16: Fides Christiana non est opinio ac humana 
 persuasio, sed finnissima fiducia et evidens ac constans animi 
 assensus, denique certissima comprehensio veritatis dei . . . 
 atque adeo dei ipsius, summi boni et prsecipue promissionis 
 divinae et Christi, qui omnium promissionum est colophon. 
 
 (Calvin, Institutt. iii. 2. 7 : Justa fidei definitio nobis con- 
 stabit, si dicamus, esse divinae erga nos benevolentiae firmam 
 certamque cognitionem, quas gratuitae in Christo promissionis 
 veritate fundata per Spiritum sanctum et revelatur mentibus 
 nostris et cordibus obsignatur.) 
 
 Cat. Heid. Fr. 21 (Germ.) : What is true faith ? It is not 
 only a certain knowledge by which I hold all to be true that 
 God hath revealed in His word, but also a hearty confidence 
 which the Holy Ghost works in me through the gospel, that 
 not only for others, but for me also, the forgiveness of sins, 
 everlasting righteousness, and blessedness with God, are be- 
 stowed of His grace : of pure grace, for the merits alone of 
 Jesus Christ. 
 
 Obscrvatioiis. 
 
 1. In order to express the manner or modes of justification by 
 faith alone, the Protestant symbols use [in conjunction with the 
 formula, Justitia Christi nobis imputatur per fidein] occasionally the 
 Pauline words (Rom. iv. 5): Fides a Deo imputatur (nobis) pro 
 justitia. A. C. art. 4 ; Apol. 121. [However, the sense in which 
 they use these words is never this, that " on account of the acting of 
 faith we are esteemed by God just," but always this, that " faith is 
 reckoned for righteousness quoad its object, that is, the righteousness 
 of Christ."] The Arminians do not approve of the statement that 
 "the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us;" and the record, 
 " Faith is reckoned to us by God for righteousness," they take in a 
 sense different from that of the Lutheran formularies. Limborch, 
 Theol. Chr. vi. 4. 39. So also, in some sense, the Socinians; vid. 
 Ostorodt, Untorr. S. 304.
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, \VORKS. 189 
 
 2. According to the Protestant doctrine, the true believer may be 
 certified of his justification. Apol. A. C. 76 ; Calvin, Instit. iii. 2. 16 ; 
 Can. Dordr. v. 9, 10 ; DecL Thorun. 55. According to the Pre- 
 destinarians, the believer is assured of his eternal salvation, since he 
 cannot again lose his justification through unbelief. The Romanists 
 deny both, in the interest of their doctrine both of faith and of justifica- 
 tion. Trid. sess. vi. 9 : Non asserendum est, . . . oportere eos, qui 
 vere justificati sunt, absque ulla omnino dubitatione apud semetipsos 
 statuere, se esse justificatos cet. Nam sicut nemo pius de dei miseri- 
 cordia, de Christi merito . . . dubitare debet, sic quilibet, dum se 
 ipsum suamque propriam infirmitatem et indispositionem respicit, de 
 sua gratia formidare et timere potest, cum nullus scire valeat certi- 
 tudine fidei, cui non potest subesse falsum, se gratiam dei esse pon- 
 secutum. Cf. Bellarm. De Justif. iii. 3 ; Mohler, Symb. 1 8 ; Klee, 
 Dogm. iii. 71. The Arminians agree with other Protestants as to the 
 assurance of justification (yid. Limb. Th. Ch. vi. 7. 1), but they reject 
 the doctrine of an assured perseverance in faith as taught by the 
 Calvinists. 
 
 3. What the Protestants understand by justifying faith may be 
 seen from the foregoing symbolical evidences. The Romanists require, 
 as a personal disposition on the part of him who shall attain justi- 
 fication, most assuredly faith ; but that faith is not a trust in the 
 merit of Christ, it is that general credence of the doctrines of the 
 Christian revelation which is rooted in the understanding. But in 
 the justified man, who seeks to attain increase of grace and eternal 
 salvation, it is living faith, working by love, fides fomnata, or faith 
 with good works, which attains to this completion of justification. 
 (Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 7.) The Socinians in this agree with the 
 Arminians, that they refer justifying faith, the centre of which is 
 personal trust, to the whole compass of the truth of redemption. It is 
 in harmony with what has been said, that the Romish Church should 
 be found maintaining that faith (as disposition towards justification) 
 precedes repentance ; while the Evangelical Church hold that peni- 
 tence leads to faith, the latter indeed being in a broader sense part of 
 repentance itself. 
 
 I. KOMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Concil. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 8 : Fides est humanae salutis 
 initium, fundamentum et radix oinnis justifications, sine qua 
 impossibile est placere deo et ad filiorum ejus consortium per- 
 venire. Cf. Cat. Bom. i. 3. 4. 
 
 Cat. Rom. i. 1. 1 : Nos de ea fide loquimur, cujus vi omnino 
 assentimur iis, quae tradita sunt divinitus. Hanc autem ad
 
 190 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 salutem consequendam esse necessariam nemo jure dubitabit. 
 . . . Quum enim finis, qui ad beatitudinem homini propositus 
 est, altior sit, quam ut humanae mentis acie perspici possit, 
 necesse ei erat ipsius a deo cognitionem accipere. Ha3c vero 
 cognitio nihil aliud est, nisi fides, cujus virtus efficit, ut id 
 ratum habeamus, quod a deo traditum esse . . . ecclesite aucto- 
 ritas comprobarit. 
 
 (Bellarmin, Justif. i 4 : (Catholici) fidem historicam et 
 miraculorum et promissionum unam et eandem esse decent 
 atque illam unam non esse proprie notitiam aut fiduciam, sed 
 assensum certum atque firmissimum ob auctoritatem primse 
 veritatis. . . . Objectum fidei justificantis, quod haeretici restrin- 
 gunt ad solam promissionem misericordiae specialis, Catholici 
 tarn late patere volunt, quam late patet verbum dei, quin 
 potius certam promissionem specialis misericordise non tarn ad 
 fidem, quam ad praesumtionern pertinere contendunt. Deinde 
 (dissentiunt) in facilitate et potentia animi, quaB sedes est 
 fidei Siquidem illi fidem collocant in voluntate, cum fiduciam 
 esse definiunt, ac per hoc earn cum spe confundunt. Fiducia 
 enim nihil est aliud, nisi spes roborata, ut sanctus Thomas 
 docet Catholici fidem in intellectu sedem habere decent. 
 Denique in ipso actu intellectus. Ipsi enim per notitiam 
 fidem definiunt, nos per assensum. Assentimur enim deo, 
 quamvis ea nobis credenda proponat, quae non intelligimus. 
 Cap. 7 : In eo, qui credit, duo sunt, apprehensio et 
 judicium s. assensus. Sed apprehensio non est fides sed 
 aliquid fidem prsecedens. Praeterea apprehensio non dicitur 
 proprie notitia. . . . Nam accidere potest, ut rusticus catho- 
 licus non apprehendat nisi confuse tria ilia nomina (trinitatis) 
 et tamen vere credat. Judicium autem s. assensus duplex est, 
 alter enim sequitur rationem et evidentiam rei, alter auctori- 
 tatem proponentis, prior dicitur notitia, posterior fides. Igitur 
 mysteria fidei, quse rationem superant, credimus, non intelli- 
 gimus, ac per hoc fides distinguitur contra scientiam et melius 
 per ignorantiam quam per notitiam definitur. Cf. Becani 
 Manual, i 233 sq. It is clear that Eoman Catholic theology 
 will not admit any elevation of faith in the promises of grace 
 given by God in Christ out of and above the common round 
 of faith in the Christian revelation. On that account, and
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WORKS. 191 
 
 also because they deny the possibility of a subjective and full 
 assurance of forgiveness to the individual sinner, they will not 
 regard the characteristic of faith as being confidence, or regard 
 such confidence as the justifying element in faith. On all 
 points the Protestant doctrine of faith contradicts that of the 
 Eomish system: see Mohler, Syrrib. 15.) 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 6 : Disponuntur ad justitiam, dum 
 excitati divina gratiA et adjuti fidem ex auditu concipientes 
 libere moventur in deum, credentes vera esse, quae divinitus 
 revelata et promissa sunt, . . . et dum, peccatores se esse 
 intelligentes a divinse justitiae timore ad considerandam dei 
 misericordiam se convertendo, in spem eriguntur . . . ac 
 propterea moventur adversus peccata per odium aliquod et 
 detestationem h. e. per earn poenitentiam, quam ante baptismum 
 agi oportet cet. 
 
 Catech. Bom. ii. 5. 5 : Fides poenitentiae pars non est, verum 
 in eo, quern pcenitet, fides pcenitentiam antecedat necesse est. 
 Neque enim potest quisquam se ad deum convertere, qui fide 
 careat. 
 
 Cf. Bellarmin, Po&nit. i. 19 ; Confut. A. C. p. 84 sq. 
 
 II. PEOTESTANT. 
 
 Conf. A. p. 12: Constat pcenitentia proprie his duabus 
 partibus. Altera est contritio s. terrores incussi conscientise 
 agnito peccato, altera est fides, quee concipitur ex evangelic s. 
 absolutione et credit propter Ch. remitti peccata et consolatur 
 conscientiam et ex terroribus liberat. Cf. A. Sm. p. 3 1 9 sqq. ; 
 F. 0. pp. 816, 822. 
 
 The Eeformed Symbols have not spoken on this point. 
 Calvin, Instit. iii. 3. 3, brings some insignificant objections to 
 Melanchthon's definitions. 1 When he himself asserts that 
 faith ought to precede penitence, the difference rests upon a 
 peculiar definition of penitence. Cf. Parei Corp. doct. ch. 482. 
 
 III. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. Eac. qu. 418: (Fides, quam necessario consequitur 
 1 Melaiich. had made the separation of penitence into mortificalio and vivificatio.
 
 102 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 salus) est fiducia per Christum in deum. Unde apparet, earn 
 in Christum fidem duo comprehendere, unum, ut non solum 
 deo, verum et Christo confidamus. Deinde, ut deo obtem- 
 peremus, non in iis solum, quse in lege per Mosen lata prsecepit 
 et per Christum abrogata non sunt ; verum etiam in iis omni- 
 bus, quae Christus legi addidit. 
 
 Ib. qu. 419: Ergo tu obedientiam sub fide comprehendis ? 
 Sic est. Etenim res ipsa indicio est, neminem inveairi posse, 
 qui spem certain vitae set. in animo concipiat, quam Ch. tantum 
 sibi obtemperantibus promisit, qui non Christo dicto audiens 
 sit cet. Ib. qu. 420 : Cur vero ap. Paulus fidem operibus 
 opponit? In iis locis, ubi ap. fidem opponit operibus, de 
 operibus ejusmodi agit, quse et perfectam et perpetuam obedi- 
 entiam continent, qualem sub lege deus ab horn, requirebat, 
 verum non de iis operibus, quae obedientiam, quam deus a 
 nobis, qui in Ch. credidimus, requirat, comprehendunt. 
 
 Ib. qu. 42 1 : (Obedientia est) ea, ut primum veterem homi- 
 nem cum operibus ipsius exuentes ab omni peccato anteacto 
 desistamus, quam quidem rem scriptura poenitentiam vocat. 
 Deinde, ut pro virili voluntatem dei exsequamur, adeo, ut 
 non secundum carnem ambulernus, verum Spiritu opera carnis 
 mortificemus, in summa : nullius peccati habitum contrahamus, 
 omnium vero virtutum christianarum habitus comparemus. 
 
 Socin. De Chr. serv. iv. 11: Fides ergo in Christum, qua 
 justificamur, quamvis obedientiam, quam spe futuri boni, quod 
 is nobis daturus sit, deo praestamus, et complectatur et significet 
 atque idcirco opus omnino declaret, operibus tamen propterea 
 merito opponitur, quia nee perpetuam et absolutissimam prse- 
 ceptorum dei conservationem ipsa per se continet, nee propria 
 vi justificat, sed propter dei clementiam, qui ejusmodi opus 
 facientibus, quod ob earn rem dei opus a Christo appellatum 
 est, justitiam quantumvis antea injustis imputare dignatus 
 est et ipsos pro justis coram se habere pro incomparabili sua 
 benignitate voluit. 
 
 IV. ARMENIAN AND MENNONTTE. 
 
 Apol. Conf. Ecmonstr. p. 113: Mihi vide, an non mera 
 logica pugna sit, si disputetur an fides, quae est viva, an fides,
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WORKS. 193 
 
 qua est viva, requiratur ad justificationem ? Certe utrimque 
 enim in describenda fidei natura est consensio, utrimque bo- 
 norum operum praesentia necessaria esse statuitur, de respectu 
 tantum, quem fides viva ad justificationem habet, qusestio 
 manet, at de respectu statuere non est nostrum, sed judicis ; 
 deinde quid habet respectus ille merus, quod justam magnse 
 liti causam dare possit, imo quid non habet, quod occasionem 
 omnem liti debeat prsecidere cet. ? Sane si dicatur, fidem 
 requiri ad justificationem, quatenus est viva fides, necessitas 
 bonorum operum et pietatis christianse fortius adstruitur, 
 quam si dicatur, fidem requiri, quse viva est. Natura rei id 
 evincit. 
 
 Conf. Bemonstr. xi. 1 sqq. : Fides in Christum est delibera- 
 tus et firmus animi assensus, verbo dei adhibitus et cum vera 
 in Christum fiducia conjunctus, quo non tantum doctrinse 
 Christ! tanquam verse ac divinse firmiter assentimus ac fidenter 
 inhseremus, sed in ipsum etiam Christum ad salutem a deo 
 nobis ex pura gratia datum toti recumbimus. Itaque ad fidem 
 veram et salvificam non sufficit sola notitia divinse voluntatis, 
 . . . neque assensus etiam quilibet, puta, subitus, perfunctorius 
 cet, sed requiritur omnino firmus et solidus voluntatisque de- 
 liberatse iinperio roboratus, denique fiducialis et obsequiosus 
 assensus, qui et fiducia dicitur. . . . Assensus ejusmodi 
 fiducialis vel obsequiosa hsec fiducia demum est vera ac viva 
 fides, quae secum necessario trahit observationem mandatorum 
 J. Ch. sive bona opera. 
 
 Limborch, Theol. christ. vi. 4. 22 : Sciendum, quando dicimus, 
 nos fide justificari, nos non excludere opera, quse fides exigit et 
 tanquam fcecunda mater producit ; sed ea includere. . . . Sine 
 operibus autem fides mortua et ad justificationem inefficax est. 
 4. 46 : Acriter hie contendere, an fides quse viva, an vero 
 quatenus viva est, nos justificet, sive, an opera ad justificationem 
 requirantur necessitate solum praesentiae, an vero etiam efn- 
 cientise, inutile judicamus, dummodo utrimque in confesso est, 
 deum ad justificationem exigere fidem vivam, fidemque non 
 esse vivam, nisi per bona opera, neminemque justificationem 
 consecuturum, nisi vivS, fide prseditum. 4. 3 1 : Cum dicimus, 
 fidem esse opus nostrum, tale non esse volumus opus, cui aut 
 ex dignitate aut ex merito ullo suo aut denique ex intrinseca 
 
 N
 
 194 CONFESSIONS OF CIIKISTENDOM. 
 
 quadam efficacia remissio peccatorum et justitise imputatio 
 debeatur, quique justitia nostra formalis sit, quae in judicio 
 dei per se subsistere possit. Male enim fides vocatur formalis 
 justificationis causa, cum talis proprie non detur, quia justifi- 
 catio est actus mentis divinae purus putus, qua deus nos habet 
 pro justis. Sed fides est conditio in nobis et a nobis requisita, 
 ut justificationem consequamur. Est itaque actus, qui licet in 
 se spectatus perfectus nequaquam sit, sed in multis deficiens, 
 tamen a deo gratiosa et liberrima voluntate pro pleno et per- 
 fecto acceptatur et propter quern deus hornini gratiose rernis- 
 sionem peccatorum et vivae aeternae praemium conferre vult. 
 
 vL 4. 29 : Objectum fidei (justificantis) dicimus esse totum 
 Jesum Christum tanquam prophetam, sacerdotem et regem, 
 non tantum ipsius propitiationem, sed et prsecepta, promissa 
 et minas, qujl itaque totum Christum integramque ejus annun- 
 tiationem omniaque beneficia salutaria amplectimur ; in ilium 
 tanquam prophetam, sacerdotem et regem credimus/ ipsius 
 doctrinam tanquam divinam recipimus, in ipsum spem ac 
 fiduciam nostram collocamus et ab eo tanquam unico nostro 
 redemtore vitam seternam e& ratione ac conditione, qua nobis 
 earn promisit, sine ulla dubitatione exspectamus. The Con- 
 fess. Eemonstr. xi. 2, thus negatively defines the idea of 
 fiducia: Non quidem absoluta fiducia specialis misericordiae, 
 quasi re ips& jam perceptae, qua scil. credo, mihi jam remissa 
 esse peccata mea (haec enim non est essentialis forma fidem 
 justificantem constituens, sed quoddam tantum consequens 
 adjunctum, imo ipsam salvificam fidem necessario tanquam 
 praerequisitam sui conditionem praesupponit) sed qua firmiter 
 statuo, fieri non posse, ut aliter quam per J. Ch. et alia quam 
 per ipsum praescripta ratione aBternam mortem evadam et vitam 
 sempiternam consequar cet. 
 
 Eis, Conf. art. 20 : Fides est certissima cognitio sive scientia 
 per gratiam dei ex S. s. acquisita, de deo nempe, de Christo 
 atque aliis rebus crelestibus, quorum cognitio et persuasio ad 
 salutem necessaria est, debetque ilia comitata esse amore dei 
 et firma confidential in unum deum cet. 21: Per vivam 
 ejusmodi fidem acquirimus veram justitiam cet.
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WORKS. 195 
 
 V. GREEK. 
 
 The older symbols of the Greek Church do not speak de- 
 finitely on the ground of justification; indeed, no dogma is 
 handled by them with less precision than that of justification 
 and the methods of grace. The Conf. orfh. declares generally 
 that TtiaTis opdrf and epya /ca\d are the essential and inse- 
 parable conditions of eternal salvation. On the other hand, 
 Jeremias, in the Act Wirt. p. 64, pressed by the Tubingen, 
 theologians, teaches that a living faith, active in good works, is 
 necessary to justification f^ovrj rfj Tricrm Kvpuos rrjv afacriv 
 TWV afjiapTiwv SiSoaBai,, ^ila^ypL^ecfOe, o>9 So/cet vjuv r/ Se KCL- 
 6o\iK.r) KK\. rrjv "TTLCTTIV fficrav aTrairel TTJV Sia roi)V ayaO&v 
 epywv /j,aprvpov/jievr)v. And p. 288, he says: reXetoiWes &>? 
 Svvarbv TOV Kara Trvevpa vopov, SiKaiwdtjaofjieda. More decided 
 in relation to Calvinism is Dosithei Conf. c. 13 (s. also Par- 
 thenii Decret. synod, p. 122): Tucnevopev ov Bia 
 a?rXw? fiovi)? Sircaiovadai TOV avOpwrrov, aXXa Sia 
 vepyov[Aevr)<; Sia T?}? ayaTTf]^, r' avrov elirelv, Sia T^? 
 /cal TWV epy&v TO Se ryv irlaTiv %6i/3o? ep<yov 
 
 a/JL^dvea-dat T^? ev XpiaTqJ SiKaioavvr)? teal 
 ei9 a-WTrjpiav, Troppa) -jracr^ evaefteias ryivaxrrcofAev. That 
 justification by faith was familiar to the Greeks, is shown by 
 Heinecc. Abbild. ii. 1 6 5 ; and Plato in Catech. S. 6 3 f. teaches 
 in strict harmony with the Protestants. 
 
 VI. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quaker system departs here in a striking manner from 
 the ordinary theology of the churches. It teaches that justi- 
 fication is no other than the formation and growth of Christ in 
 us. This finished stamp of Christ in us is wrought, however, 
 by grace through the internal light; as God in the day of 
 visitation causes the divine seed in man to germinate. To this, 
 man of himself can contribute nothing ; it is for him only not 
 to reject the proffered grace, but to yield himself up believing 
 to this enlightenment. This surrender is the faith that dis- 
 cerns and embraces Christ ; faith is therefore by this internal 
 enlightenment begotten: hence the man who may not have
 
 19 G CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 heard of the historical Christ or the external gospel, may yet 
 be enlightened, accepted, and saved through Christ. To know 
 Christ inwardly is the only and truly fruitful knowledge of 
 Him. But he who is thus enlightened and regenerated through 
 the light must needs live holily ; in these his good works, there- 
 fore, which are the living signs of a Christ formed inwardly 
 within, is he justified. See Barclay, Apol. Prop. v. 6 and 7. 
 
 THIED POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 It is the common doctrine of Eome and Protestantism, that 
 the will of God requires believers to walk in good works (F. 
 C. p. YOO). But Protestants will not admit that good works 
 have in them any meritoriousness before God, assuming that 
 they are the necessary consequences of a preceding justifica- 
 tion. The Eoman Church teaches that he who has become 
 justified in Christ, merits for himself by his good deeds 
 growth in the divine grace, everlasting life, and increase of 
 his heavenly glory. In common with Protestants generally, 
 the Arminians, Socinians, and Mennonites deny the meri- 
 toriousness of good works. 
 
 I. EOMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 1 6 : Justificatis hominibus . . . 
 proponenda sunt ap. verba ; abundate in omni bono opere cet. 
 Atque ideo bene operantibus usque in finem et in deo super- 
 antibus proponenda est vita seterna, et tanquam gratia filiis 
 per Ch. misericorditer promissa, et tanquam merces ex ipsius 
 dei promissione bonis ipsorum operibus et meritis fideliter 
 reddenda. . . . Cum ille ipse Ch. tanquam caput in membra 
 ... in ipsos justificatos jugiter virtutem influat, quaa virtus 
 bona eorum opera semper antecedit et comitatur et subsequitur, 
 et sine qua nullo pacto deo grata et meritoria esse possent, 
 nihil ipsis Justificatis amplius deesse credendum est, quominus 
 plene illis quidem operibus, quae in deo sunt facta, divinae legi 
 pro hujus vitse statu satisfecisse et vitam seternam suo etiam
 
 JUSTIFICATION : FAITH, WORKS. 197 
 
 tempore, si tamen in gratia decesserint, consequendam vere 
 promeruisse censeantur. . . . Absit tamen, ut christiamis homo 
 in se ipso vel confidat vel gloriatur . . . et non in domino, cujus 
 tanta est erga omnes homines bonitas, tit eoruru velit esse 
 merita, quae sunt ipsius dona. Cf. sess. xiv. pcenit. cap. 8. 
 
 Ib. sess. vi. can. 24 : Si quis dixerit, justitiam acceptam non 
 conservari, neque etiam augeri coram deo per bona opera, sed 
 opera ipsa fructus solummodo et signa esse justificationis 
 adeptae, non autem ipsius augendae causam, anath. sit. Can. 
 32 : Si quis dixerit, hominis justificati bona opera ita esse 
 dona dei, ut non sint etiam bona ipsius justificati merita, aut 
 ipsum justificatum bonis operibus, quae ab eo per dei gratiam 
 et Christi meritum fiunt, non vere mereri augmentum gratiae, 
 vitam aeternam et ipsius vitae aeternae, si tamen in gratia de- 
 cesserit, consecutionem atque etiam glorias augmentum, anath. 
 sit 
 
 Cat. Bom. ii. 5. 71 : Tota pcenitentia a Christi passionis 
 merito pendet. A quo etiam honestis actionibus duo ilia 
 maxima bona consequimur ; alterum est, ut immortalis glorias 
 prsemia mereamur, ita ut calix etiam aquae frigidee, quam in 
 ejus nomine dederimus, mercede non careat cet. Cf. qu. 72. 
 
 (Bellarmin, Justific. v. 1 : Habet communis catholicorum 
 omnium sententia, opera bona justorum vere ac proprie esse 
 merita, et merita non cujuscunque prsemii, sed ipsius vitae 
 seternse. iv. 7 : Nos dicimus, opera bona homini justo esse 
 necessaria ad salutem, non solum ratione prsesentioe sed etiam 
 ratione efficientise, quoniam efficiunt salutem, et sine ipsis sola 
 fides non efficit salutem. Intelligimus autem, hoc esse neces- 
 sarium hominibus rationis usum habentibus. . . . Non enim 
 negamus, quin infantes et etiam adulti recens baptizati sal- 
 ventur, si continuo ex hac vita decedant.) S. Klee, Dogm. iii. 
 S. 58 ff. 
 
 Ib. v. 5 : Merita justorum non opponuntur meritis Christi, 
 sed ab illis nascuntur et quidquid ipsa justorum merita laudis 
 habent, id totum redundat in laudem meritorum Christi. . . . 
 Nemo nisi plane stultus dicere potest, detrahi de gloria Christi, 
 si servi ejus per gratiam ejus, per spiritum ejus, per fidem et 
 caritatem ab ipso inspiratam bona opera faciant, quce ita vere 
 sint justa, ut iis debeatur a justo judice corona justitue ; . . .
 
 198 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 nec merita hominum requiruntur propter insufficientiam meri- 
 torum Christi, sed propter maximam eorum efficaciam. Me- 
 ruerunt enim Christi opera apud deum non solum, ut salutem 
 consequeremur, sed etiam ut earn per merita propria conse- 
 queremur. (In explanation of mereri . . . vitam aeternam, 
 Bellarmine adds, v. 20 : Nos existimamus, vitam set. turn quoad 
 primum gradum turn quoad ceteros reddi bonis meritis filiorum 
 dei. Nam scriptura div. passim docet, non solum glorise 
 incrementam sed ipsam gloriam simpliciter prsemium esse 
 operum bonorum. . . . Ex quo intelligimus, ilium ipsum 
 gradum glorise, qui debetur jure haereditario, retribui etiam 
 jure mercedis cet.) 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 As to the confusion in the Greek dogma, see above. Sal- 
 vation is by the Greek Church grounded on works. Jer. in 
 Act. Wirtenib. p. 67 : TratBevofieda, on ^r] Trdv-ra o\oK.\r)pw 
 Kal vofiiua)*: 7r\r)p<acravTa, 0*5 77 eVc^yeXei'a r/}9 8aai\eias TWV 
 ovpav&v TT(vyye\\Tcu /cat <av dvev aTrrjjopevrai, Kal ^>i/Xa^a/ie- 
 vov, ovrto TTpoaboKav Kara^LfoO^vai r^5 7rayy\La<s. Dositheus, 
 Conf. 1 3, describes irians as justifying Sia TWV epywv ; Cyril- 
 lus Lucaris (Conf. c. 9 and 13). Parthenius was condemned 
 by misunderstanding of the Synod (Parthen. p. 123): trjv 
 iriaiiv yvfjivrjv rwv epycov crdi^eiV) etvai Be ravTtjv OVK, epjov 
 rjfierepov d\\a TOV Xptarov JJLOVOV. ei;ci)0v SLKCUOVVTOS TOV 
 avOpwrrov 8 ia TT}? ^0)^9 /cat Bavdrov avrov and Cyr. L. : 
 KJ3d\\ei, ra Ka\d rwv epywv TTJS rwv dvBpWTrcov 
 dvaipovv Bia rovrov rb<y' eV avry ov fj.6vov dperrjv irdaav 
 filov evOeov d\\d Trda-av rrjv i 
 
 Observation. 
 
 The Romanists and Greeks agree in making prominent three good 
 works : prayers, fasts, and alms. They are such religious acts as, rest- 
 ing upon free-will, may be reckoned among satisfactions, and assume, 
 therefore, a very important place in the institute of penance. See 
 below, XVII.
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WOKKS. 199 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 A. 0. p. 11 : Decent, quod fides debeat bonos fructus 
 parere et quod oporteat bona opera mandata a deo facere 
 propter voluntatem del, non ut confidamus per ea opera justi- 
 ficationem coram deo mereri. P. 1 2 : Sequi debent (fidem) 
 bona opera, quse sunt fructus poenitentise. P. 18 : Quia per 
 fidem accipitur Spiritus sanctus, jam corda renovantur et 
 induunt novos affectus, ut parere bona opera possint. 
 
 Apol. A. G. p. 81 : Nos quoque dicimus, quod dilectio 
 fidem sequi debeat. Neque tamen ideo sentiendum est, quod 
 fiducia hujus dilectionis aut propter bane dilectionem accipi- 
 amus remissionem peccatorum et reconciliationem. P. 83 : 
 Postquam fide justificati et renati sumus, incipimus deum 
 timere, diligere, petere et exspectare ab eo auxilium, . . . et 
 obedire ei in afflictionibus. Incipimus et diligere proximos, 
 quia corda habent spirituales et sanctos motus. P. 8 5 : Falso 
 calumniantur nos adversarii, quod nostri non doceant bona 
 opera, cum ea non solum requirant, sed etiam ostendant, 
 quomodo fieri possint. P. 108 : Nos loquimur de fide, quse 
 resistit terroribus conscientise, quse erigit et consolatur perter- 
 refacta corda ; talis fides neque facilis res est neque humana 
 potentia, sed divina potentia, qu& vivificamur cet. Hsec fides, 
 cum sit nova vita, necessario parit novos motus et opera. 
 P. 133 : Necesse est bene operari. Justificatis dicimus pro- 
 missam esse vitam set. Ideo justificamur, ut justi bene 
 operari et obedire legi dei incipiamus; ideo regeneramur et 
 Sp. sanctum accipimus, ut nova vita habeat nova opera, 
 timorem, dilectionem dei cet. 
 
 F. C. p. 586 : Confitemur, etsi antecedens contritio et 
 subsequens nova obedientia ad articulum justificationis coram 
 deo non pertinent, non tamen talem fidem justificantem esse 
 fingendam, quse una cum malo proposito, peccandi videlicet, 
 esse et stare possit. Sed postquam homo per fidem est justi- 
 ficatus, turn veram illam et vivam fidem esse per caritatem 
 emcacem et bona opera semper fidem justificantem sequi. 
 Fides enim vera nunquam sola est, quin caritatem et spem 
 semper secum nabeat. 
 
 II. p. 589 : Nostra confessio est, quod bona opera veram
 
 200 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 fidem certissime atque indubitato sequantur, tanquam fructus 
 bonae arboris ; credimus etiam, quod bona opera penitus ex- 
 cludenda sint, non tantum cum de justifications fidei agitur, 
 sed etiam cum de salute nostra sterna disputatur. P. 688 : 
 Caritas fructus est, qui veram fidem certissime et necessario 
 sequitur. Qui enim non diligit, de eo recte judicari potest, 
 quod non sit justificatus, sed quod adhuc in morte detineatur, 
 aut rursus justitiam fidei amiserit. 
 
 In the Evangelical Lutheran Church there arose a special 
 discussion on the necessity of good works to salvation. This 
 was the Majorist controversy. It was in reference to this 
 that the above decision of the Form. Cone, was given. 
 
 F. C. p. 702 : Propositiones ha3, bona opera esse necessaria 
 et necesse esse bene agere, in commemorata pia et genuina 
 sentential immerito a quibusdam reprehenduntur et rejiciuntur. 
 . . . Interim tamen de hoc etiam discrimine commonefactio 
 observanda, quod per vocab. necessitatis intelligenda sit neces- 
 sitas ordinis mandati et voluntatis Christi ac debiti nostri, 
 non autem necessitas coactionis cet. 
 
 IV. EEFORMED. 
 
 Conf. ffelv. ii. c. 15 : Loquimur de fide viva vivificanteque, 
 quse propter Christum, qui vita est et vivificat quern compre- 
 hend it, viva est et dicitur ac se vivam esse vivis declarat 
 operibus. C. 16 : Fides retinet nos in officio, quod deo de- 
 bemus et proximo, et . . . ut uno verbo omnia dicam, omnis 
 generis bonos fructus et bona opera progignit. Quamvis 
 doceamus cum apostolo, hominem gratis justificari per fidem 
 in Chr. et non per ulla opera bona, non ideo tamen vilipendi- 
 mus aut condemn amus opera bona. Damnamus omnes, qui 
 bona opera contemnunt. Interim non sentimus, per opera 
 bona nos servari illaque ad salutem ita esse necessaria, ut 
 absque illis nemo unquam sit servatus. Gratia enim soliusque 
 Christi beneficio servamur. Opera necessario ex fide pro- 
 gignuntur. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 22: Tantum abest, ut bene et sancte 
 vivendi studium fides exstinguat, ut etiam illud cieat et in- 
 flammet in nobis, unde bona opera necessario consequuntur.
 
 JUSTIFICATION : FAITH, WORKS. "201 
 
 Ceterum . . . tamen profitemur, bona opera non respici a deo, 
 lit per ea justificemur ant filii del censeri mereamur. 
 
 TJiirty-nine Artt. art. xii. : Albeit that good works, which 
 are the fruits of faith, and follow after justification, cannot put 
 away our sins, and endure the severity of God's judgment ; yet 
 are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ, and do 
 spring out necessarily of a true and lively faith ; insomuch 
 that by them a lively faith may be as evidently known, as a 
 tree discerned by the fruit. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 24 : Tantum abest, ut fides justificans 
 homines in recta sanctaque vita tepidiores efficiat, ut prorsus e 
 contrario sine ilia ipsa nemo unquam quidquam ex amore dei, 
 sed amore tantum sui vel condemnationis metu effecturus sit. 
 Fieri itaque non potest, ut sancta hsec fides in homine otiosa 
 sit. . . . Atque hsec opera, quse a bona fidei radice proficis- 
 cuntur, coram deo bona eique accepta sunt, quoniam omnia 
 per illius gratiam sanctificantur ; verumtamen ad nos justi- 
 ficandos in censum rationemque non veniunt. 
 
 Conf. Tetrapol. cap. 4. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The grounds of the Protestant rejection of the merit of good works 
 are the express words of Scripture. At the same time, the actual 
 imperfectness of the good works of the saints is to be pointed to. On 
 the Reformed side, especial reference is made to the fact that good 
 works are not evidences of any good in man, but of the power of the 
 Holy Ghost. 
 
 V. ARMINIAN. 
 
 Limborch, Theol. cJir. v. 78. 12: Huic de obedientise 
 seu bonorum operum necessitate qusestioni alia adhseret de 
 bonorum opp. merito, utrum nimirum bona nostra opera mere- 
 antur vitam seternam. Quaestio haec nobis intercedit cum 
 pontificiis. Fatemur nos, si propria vocis meriti significatione 
 neglecta ampliorem et minus propriam illi tribuamus, posse 
 bona fidelium opera catachrestice et in laxiori significatione 
 merita vocari, quoniam deus ea vita set. remunerari gratiose 
 promisit cet. Sed quia hsec est significatio vocis meriti minus 
 propria et pontificii in ea non acquiescunt, sed et opera nostra
 
 202 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 intrinseco suo valore vitam aet. merer! contendunt, prsestat 
 a voce merit! abstinere utpote quae meritum proprie dictum 
 involvere videatur, cum si merit! proprie diet! naturam in- 
 spiciamus, quaeque ad meritum constituendum requirantur, 
 consideremus, . . . manifestum futurum sit, ea omnia operibus 
 nostris deesse ac proinde opera nostra vitas aet. meritoria esse 
 non posse. Cf. Simon. Episcop. Op. ii 528 sqq. 
 
 VI SOCINIAN. 
 
 F. Socin. Opp. i p. 620 b: Diximus (opera) aliquo modo 
 meritoria, ut ab ipsis operibus excludamus non modo absolutum 
 et maxime proprium meritum, quod oritur ex ipsa operum 
 praestantia per se considerata, sed etiam illud, quod minus 
 proprie et respective meritum est, quippe quod ... ex solo 
 del promisso oritur, adeo ut nemo neque per illud neque 
 per hoc meritum suorum operum justificationem adipiscatur. 
 Ubi considerandum interea est, quod nihilominus merito die! 
 potest, dari obedientiam, quae possit dici causa justifications 
 nostrae propter dei promissum, nee tamen dicendum sit, operum 
 merito tune justificationem nobis concedi, quippe quod obedi- 
 entia ista sub ipso N. T., si omnia praecepta in e& nobis data 
 considerentur, non possit dici perfecta, quamvis deus pro su& 
 bonitate velit, si e& praediti fuerimus, nos justificatos pro- 
 nuntiare. 
 
 Schyn, Plen. deduct, p. 232 : Fatemur, perfectam Christi 
 obedientiam vera et vml fide acceptam nostrae asternae salutis 
 unicam esse causam ; . . . non credimus, bona opera nos sal- 
 vare, sed agnoscimus bona opera pro debita" obedientia et 
 fructibus fidei. 
 
 VII. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers assume to be midway between Protestants and 
 Romanists in this matter. See Barclay, Apol. vii. 3. Although 
 we place remission of sins in the righteousness and obedience 
 of Christ, performed by Him in the flesh, as to what pertains 
 to the remote procuring cause, and that we hold ourselves 
 formally justified by Christ Jesus formed and brought forth in
 
 JUSTIFICATION: FAITH, WORKS. 203 
 
 us, yet can we not, as some Protestants have unwarily done, 
 exclude works from justification. For, though properly we 
 be not justified for them, yet are we justified in them; and 
 they are necessary, even as causa sine qua non. . . . Since 
 good works as naturally follow from this birth as heat from 
 fire, therefore are they of absolute necessity to justification 
 as causa sine qua non, i.e. though not as the cause for which, 
 yet as that in which we are, and without which we cannot 
 be justified ; and though they be not meritorious, and draw 
 no debt upon God, yet He cannot but accept and reward 
 them. For it is contrary to His nature to deny His own, 
 since thay may be perfect in their kind, as proceeding from a 
 pure, holy birth and root. . . . Against the merit of these 
 works in the Romish sense, comp. vii. 12. We are far from 
 thinking or believing that man merits anything by His works 
 from God, all being of free grace ; and therefore do we and 
 always have denied that Popish notion of merit de condigno. 
 Nevertheless we cannot deny but that God, out of His infinite 
 goodness wherewith He hath loved mankind, after He com- 
 municates to him His holy grace and spirit, doth, according 
 to His own will, recompense and reward the good works of 
 His children ; and therefore this merit of congruity or reward, 
 in so far as the Scripture is plain and positive for it, we may 
 not deny. 
 
 Observation. 
 
 The acceptableness of the good \vorks of the justified, and even 
 their rewardablenesss, is not denied by Protestants. 1 Under what 
 restrictions, however, they assert both, will be seen in the Confessions. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 96: Docemus, operibus fidelium proposita 
 et promissa esse preemia ; docemus bona opera meritoria esse, 
 non remissionis peccatorum gratiae aut justificationis, hsec 
 enim tantum fide consequimur, sed aliorum preemiorum cor- 
 poralium et spiritualium in hac vita et post hanc vitam. 
 P. 135 : N"os non rixamur de vocabulo mercedis, de hac re 
 
 1 The Conf. Wirtem. p. 106, does not hesitate to use this expression : Bona 
 opera mereri gratuita dei dementia sua qusedam sive corporalia sive spiritualia 
 pnemia.
 
 204 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 litigamus, utrum bona opera per se sint digna gratia et vita* 
 seternft, an vero placeant tantum propter fidem, quae appre- 
 liendit mediatorem Christum. Adversarii nostri non solum 
 hoc tribuunt operibus, quod sint digna gratia et vita seterna 
 cet. P. 136 : Nos fatemur, vitam aet. mercedem esse, quia 
 est res debita propter promissionem, non propter merita nostra. 
 Est enim promissa justificatio, et huic dono dei conjuncta est 
 promissio vitas set. Hanc promissionem scire sanctos oportet, 
 non ut propter suum commodum laborent, . . . sed ne despe- 
 rent in afflictionibus cet. Of. p. 138 ; F. C. p. 700 ; Conf. 
 Saxon (art. 9 and 10), p. 65 sqq. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 1 6 : Placent approbanturque a deo opera, 
 quse a nobis fiunt per fidem, quia illi placent deo propter 
 fidem in Christum, qui faciunt opera bona, quae insuper per 
 Spiritum sanctum ex gratia dei sunt facta. Doeemus, deum 
 bona operantibus amplam dare mercedem. Eeferimus tamen 
 mercedem hanc, quam dominus dat (bonis operibus), non ad 
 meritum hominis accipientis, sed ad bonitatem vel liberali- 
 tatem et veritatem dei promittentis atque dantis, qui, cum 
 nihil debeat cuiquam, promisit tamen, se suis cultoribus 
 fidelibus mercedem daturum. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 24 : Non negamus, deum bona opera re- 
 munerari, verum gratise esse dicimus, quod coronet sua dona. 
 Cf. Catech. Heidelb. 63. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xvi. sec. 2 : These good works, done in 
 obedience to God's commandments, are the fruits and evidences 
 of a true and lively faith; and by them believers manifest 
 their thankfulness, strengthen their assurance, edify their 
 brethren, adorn the profession of the gospel, stop the mouths 
 of the adversaries, and glorify God, whose workmanship they 
 are, created in Christ Jesus thereunto, that, having their fruit 
 unto holiness, they may have the end eternal life.
 
 XL 
 
 THE HOLINESS OF THE EEGENERATE, AND 
 WORKS OF SUPEREROGATION. 
 
 POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 ACCORDING to the Eoman and Greek doctrine, the regenerate 
 may not only keep perfectly the commandments of God, but 
 also perform certain good works, which are not commanded, 
 counselled only by Christ (consilia evangelica), and these as 
 done are opera supererogationis, or works of supererogation. 1 
 The Protestants deny any distinction between the command- 
 ments of God and evangelical counsels; and the rather, 
 because no regenerate man even perfectly fulfils the law of 
 God. (This, however, the Quakers and some others deny.) 
 Consequently the Protestants consistently reject the system 
 of monkery, so far as this is regarded as a higher perfection, 
 and something meritorious in itself in the sight of God. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 a. As to whether the Justified may perfectly fulfil the 
 Law of God. 
 
 I. EOMAN AND QUAKER. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 1 1 : Nemo temeraria ilia . . . voce 
 nti debet, dei prsecepta homini justificato ad observandum 
 esse impossibilia. . . . Licet enim in hac mortal! vita quan- 
 
 1 The expression opera supererogationis is sometimes used of the salisfactiones 
 superabundantes sanctorum, which, however, Bellarmine, De indulg. ii. 9, does 
 not approve. 
 
 205
 
 206 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 tumvis sancti et justi in levia saltern et quotidiana, qure etiam 
 venialia dicuntur, peccata quandoque cedant, non propterea 
 desinunt esse justL 
 
 Cf. can. 18 ; Catech. Rom. iii. 1. 7. 
 
 (Bellarmin, De justific. iv. 1 sqq., gives these as the rational 
 grounds of the Romish doctrine: 1. Si prsecepta essent im- 
 possibilia, neminem obligarent, ac per hoc praecepta non essent 
 prsecepta. Neque enim fingi potest, quomodo aliquis peccet 
 in eo, quod vitare non potest. 2. Si lex domini esset impos- 
 sibilis, sequeretur, deum omni tyranno esse crudeliorem et 
 stultiorem, quippe qui ab ipsis etiam amicis tributum exigeret, 
 quod nemo solvere posset, et leges ferret, quas sciret a nemine 
 observandas. Hence it may be seen how much of what 
 Mb'hler urges against the Protestant doctrine is new and pecu- 
 liar to him.) 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop, vii 3 : For though we judge so of the 
 best works performed by man, endeavouring a conformity 
 with the outward law by his own strength and in his own 
 will, yet we believe that such works as naturally proceed from 
 this spiritual birth and formation of Christ in us are pure 
 and holy, even as the root from which they come ; and there- 
 fore God accepts them, justifies us in them, and rewards us 
 for them of His own free grace. . . . Wherefore their judg- 
 ment is false and against the truth, that say that the holiest 
 works of the saints are defiled and sinful in the sight of God. 
 For these good works are not the works of the law excluded 
 by the apostle from justification. 
 
 II PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 91 : Tota scriptura, tota ecclesia clamat, legi 
 non satisfied. Non igitur placet ilia inchoata legis impletio 
 propter se ipsam, sed propter fidem in Christum. Alioqui lex 
 semper accusat nos. . . . Semper in hac infirmitate nostra 
 adest peccatum, quod imputari poterat P. 92 : Sentire nos 
 oportet, quod procul a perfectione legis absimus. P. 121: 
 Vix imbecillis et exigua legis impletio contingit etiam sanctis. 
 P. 191 : Nemo tantum facit, quantum lex requirit. C 
 p. 89, Conf. Saxon, p. 65 sq.
 
 THE HOLINESS OF THE KEGENEKATE. 207 
 
 F. 0. p. 6 78 : (Rejicitur) pontificum et monachorum doc- 
 trina, quod homo, postquam regenerates est, legem del in hac 
 vita perfecte implere possit. S. against Schwenkfeld's fol- 
 lowers, p. 829. 
 
 Conf. Heli). ii. c. 1 6 : Sunt multa indigna deo et imperfecta 
 plurima inveniuntur in operibus etiam sanctorum. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 24: Nullum opus facere possumus, quod 
 non sit carnis vitio pollutum ac proinde pcenis dignum. 
 
 Conf. Scot. 1 5 : Affirmamus, neminem in terra" (Christo solo 
 excepto) opere et revera ita prsestitisse, prsestare aut prsesti- 
 turum earn in opere obedientiam legi, quam lex requirit. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xvi. sec. 6 : Yet notwithstanding, the per- 
 sons of believers being accepted through Christ, their good 
 Avorks also are accepted in Him, not as though they were in 
 this life wholly unblameable and unreprovable in God's sight, 
 but that He, looking upon them in His Son, is pleased to 
 accept and reward that which is sincere, although accompanied 
 with many weaknesses and imperfections. 
 
 Catech. Heid. 6 2 : Our best works in the present life are 
 all imperfect and stained with sin. Cf. Declar. Thorun. ii. 4. 
 10 ; Conf. Eemons. xi. 6. 
 
 [The grounds on which the Evangelical Church thus teaches 
 are simply these : The law of God commands, Thou shalt not 
 covet. Who keeps this ? The sum of the law is to love God 
 with all the soul and with all the strength, and the neigh- 
 bour as self (Luke x. 2 6). Who keeps this ? Therefore all 
 are sinners, and come short of the glory of God (Horn. iii. 23).] 
 
 &. Whether the Justified can do more than keep the 
 Commandments. 
 
 I. ROMAN AND GKEEK. 
 
 In the symbols of the Eoman Church there is no doctrine 
 of the consilia evangelica, and the consequent opera superero- 
 gationis. The Cat. Rom. iii. 3 only hints at it in passing. 
 Hence we turn to Bellarmine. 
 
 Bellarm. De monachis, cap. 7 : Consilium perfectionis 
 vocamus opus bonum, a Christo nobis non imperatum sed 
 demonstration, non mandatum sed commendatum. Differt
 
 208 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 autem a praecepto ex parte materiee, ex parte subject!, ex parte 
 fonnse, ex parte finis. Ex parte materiae dupliciter. Primo 
 quia materia praecepti est facilior, consilii difficilior : ilia enim 
 sumta est ex principiis natura3, haec superat quodammodo 
 naturam, nam ad servandam conjugii fidem natura inclinat, at 
 non ita ad abstinendum a conjugio. . . . Secundo quia materia 
 praecepti bona est, consilii melior et perfectior, loquendo de 
 praeceptis, quse circa eandem materiam versantur, circa quam 
 versantur consilia : consilium enim includit praeceptum et ali- 
 quid supra prseceptum addit. ... Ex parte subject! differunt 
 consilia et praecepta, quod prseceptum commune sit omnium, 
 consilium non item. ... Ex parte formae, quod praeceptum vi 
 sua obliget, consilium in arbitrio hominis positum sit. . . . Ex 
 parte finis sive effectus, quod prceceptum observatum habet 
 praemium, non observatum habet pcenam ; consilium autem si 
 non servetur, nullam habet pcenam, et si servettir, majus habet 
 praemium. Cap. 8 : Sententia est catholicor. omnium, multa 
 esse vere et proprie consilia evang. (cf. Apol. A. C. p. 191), 
 sed prsecipue tria, continentiam, obedientiam et paupertatem, 
 quse nee sint praecepta nee indifferentia, sed deo grata et ab 
 illo commendata (cf. Matt. xix. 11 sq., 21 ; 1 Cor. vii. 1, V). 
 Cap. 1 2 : Videmus in omnibus bene institutis rebuspublicis 
 praeter praemia et pcenas . . . esse etiam prsemia qusedam de- 
 creta heroicis operibus ; . . . ita ergo non abhorret a ratione, 
 imo potius conforme est rationi, ut praeter vitam seternam, 
 promissam observatoribus legis divinae, sint etiam certa praemia 
 et singulares honores pro iis, qui non solum dei legem servant, 
 sed etiam virtutes heroicas ostendunt. 
 
 Cf. Mohler, neue Untersuch. S. 295 ff. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. 19, p. 142: rwv T?}? Xpiar. 
 $i$acrKa\ias ra fiev <rriv eirtrayparifca a>? avayKala, olov TO 
 fj,rj (froveveiv, . . . ra Se eTrtra/y/i. fiev to? avcvyKala OVK av eirj^ 
 Se a\Xa>5 KOI TroXXwy cy/ceo/iwoy a%ia, olov ra T^? 
 TrapOevlas KaropOtofut, f) co-flari) uteri) fjLoa-vvi), 17 aicpa 
 cu9 Kal Trjv erepav Trapeiav Trporelvetv rot rjBij Barepav 
 teal reXevralov avrb 17 7ravre\r)<; aTra\\cvyr) rwv rov 
 0opv/3a>v. 'E%pf)V Se elvat Tivas ev ry KK\i]<Tia, ot 
 teal ravra fj,er\6oiev, "va firj Trai^eXw? apya fj ra Kvpiatca 
 pijfj.ara. . . . oTrep vrdpecrriv ISeiv Trap' f]iuv, ol Trdvres
 
 THE HOLINESS OF THE EEGENERATE. 209 
 
 l reXoOcrt. rou? oz/ra? Se ot \oi7rol aTro^e^ovrai teal 
 ayavrai. 
 
 II. PEOTESTANT. 
 
 A. C. p. 33: Addebant (Pontificii), vitam monasticam non 
 tantum justitiam merer! coram deo, sed amplius etiam, quia 
 servaret non modo prsecepta, sed etiam consilia evangelica. 
 
 ApoL A. C. p. 190 sq. : De lege sic dicunt : Dens conde- 
 scendens nostrae infirmitati constituit homini mensuram eorum, 
 ad quee de necessitate tenetur, quse est observatio prseceptorum, 
 nt de reliquo i. e. de operibus supererogationis possit satis- 
 facere de commissis. Hie fingunt, homines legem dei ita 
 facere posse, ut plus etiam, quam lex exigit, facere possimus. 
 . . . Nemo tantum facit, quantum lex requirit. P. 282 : 
 Falsum et hoc est, quod observationes monastics sint opera 
 consiliorum evangelii. Nam evangelium non consulit dis- 
 crimina vestitus, ciborum, abdicationem rerum propriarum ; hce 
 sunt traditiones humanse. Cf. p. 282. 
 
 Conf. Wirtemb. p. 105: Quod nonnulli sentiunt, hominem 
 posse in hac vita" eo pervenire, ut non tantum impleat suis 
 operibus decalogum, verum etiam possit plura et majora opera 
 facere, quam in decalogo prsecepta sunt, quse vocant opera 
 supererogationis, alienum est a prophetica et apostolica doctrina. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. 14: Voluntary works, besides over 
 and above God's commandments, which they call works of 
 supererogation, cannot be taught without arrogancy and im- 
 piety; for by them men do declare that they do not only 
 render unto God as much as they are bound to do, but that 
 they do more for His sake than of bounden duty is required ; 
 whereas Christ saith plainly, When ye have done all that are 
 commanded to you, say, We are unprofitable servants. Cf. 
 Conf. Scot, negat. p. 127; Declar. Thorun. ii. 4. 1 5. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xvi. sec. 4 : They who in their obedience 
 attain to the greatest height which is possible in this life, are 
 eo far from being able to supererogate, and to do more than 
 God requires, as that they fall short of much which in duty 
 they are bound to do. Sec. 5 : We cannot by our best works 
 merit pardon of sin or eternal life at the hand of God, by 
 
 o
 
 210 CONFESSIONS OF CHKISTENDOM. 
 
 reason of the great disproportion that is between them and 
 the glory to come, and the infinite distance that is between us 
 and God, whom by them we can neither profit nor satisfy for 
 the debt of our former sins ; but when we have done all we 
 can, we have done but our duty, and are unprofitable servants ; 
 and because, as they are good, they proceed from His Spirit ; 
 and as they are wrought by us, they are defiled and mixed 
 with so much weakness and imperfection, that they cannot 
 endure the severity of God's judgment. 
 
 Limborch, TJieol. christ. v. 76. 17: Colligimus, vota monas- 
 tica non esse a deo, utpote nuncupantiores, quas deus nullo prae- 
 cepto fatentibus ipsis Pontificiis sibi gratas declaravit. Dices : 
 Consulit tamen eas ut perfectius quid ? Eesp. nulla ejusmodi 
 consiliorum in scripturis mentio est. Fatemur quidem, in 
 scripturis aliquando consilia qusedam proponi, quse a prseceptis 
 necessario observandis distinguenda sunt, eorum tamen obser- 
 vationem, prout in se nude spectantur, indifferentem esse ; 
 posse autem ejusmodi incidere speciales circumstantias, quce 
 consilium mutant in prseceptum et rem alioquin natura sua 
 liberam necessariam faciunt. Nihil autem hoc cum consiliis, 
 quorum observatio majorem glorise gradum mereri dicitur, 
 commune habet. 
 
 c. Monasticism and Vows. 
 
 On the dogma of evangelical counsels is founded the insti- 
 tute of monasticism, which still exists in the Eoman and Greek 
 Churches. Bellarmine, De monach. c. 8, says that it is the 
 opinion of all Catholics, that there are many evangelical pre- 
 cepts, but especially three, those of continence, obedience, 
 and poverty, the three well-known monastic vows. And he 
 defines the estate of the religious as that state of men which 
 tends to Christian perfection through these three vows. The 
 Council of Trent did not treat of monasticism in a dogmati- 
 cally connected way ; it takes for granted the existence of the 
 institute, and issues only some reformatory decrees (e.g. sess. 
 25) de regularibus et monialibus. Against the Protestants the 
 Confut. A. C. p. 108 protested. Cf. also Eck, Loci, c. 17. As 
 to the doctrinal views of the Greek Church, see Metroph. 
 Critop. Con/, p. 142. Jeremias, in Act. Wirtem., says : d ra
 
 THE HOLINESS OF THE EEGENERATE. 211 
 
 ayada ep<ya (TTepyere iravra, o>9 \ejT, /cat ravra (r^v fiova- 
 'Xf.KrjV TroXtretai/), ayada ovra, crTepryetv cxpetXere ; cf. also pp. 
 132, 136. The Protestant refutation rested mainly on the 
 character of meritoriousness, which the monastic estate was 
 supposed to possess. But this led to a consideration of the 
 lawfulness of such vows generally. We shall only give a few 
 condensed references from the symbols. 
 
 PKOTESTANT SYMBOLS. 
 
 Apol. G. A. p. 279 sq. : Primum hoc certissimum est, non 
 esse licitum votum, quo sentit is, qui vovet, se mereri remis- 
 sionem peccatorum coram deo aut satisfacere pro peccatis 
 coram deo. Nam hsec opinio est manifesta contumelia evan- 
 gelii, quod docet, nobis gratis donari remissionem peccatorum 
 propter Christum. . . . Secundo obedientia, paupertas et 
 coelibatus, si tamen non sit impurus, exercitia sunt adiaphora 
 et sancti viri usi sunt (iis) propter utilitatem corporalem, ut 
 expeditions essent ad docendum et ad alia pia officia, non 
 quod opera ipsa per se sint cultus, qui justificent aut mere- 
 antur vitam seternam. . . . Tertio in votis monasticis pro- 
 mittitur castitas. Supra autem diximus de conjugio sacer- 
 dotum, non posse votis aut legibus tolli jus naturae in hominibus, 
 . . . quare hoc votum non est licitum in his, qui non habent 
 donum continentise, sed propter imbecillitatem contaminantur. 
 
 Art. Sm. p. 336 : Quia vota monastica e diametro pugnant 
 cum primo principal! articulo, ideo plane abroganda sunt; 
 . . . qui enim votum facit in monasterio vivendi, is credit, se 
 vitse rationem sanctiorem initurum esse, quam alii Christiani 
 ducunt et suis operibus non tantum sibi, sed etiam aliis ccelum 
 mereri vult. Hoc vero quid aliud est, quam Christum negare ? 
 
 Conf. Wirtemb. p. 126 sq. : Non est dubium, quin vota pia, 
 justa et legitima sint servanda ac solvenda et vota impia sint 
 rescindenda. Sed haud immerito disputatur, in quo votorum 
 genere collocanda sint vota monachorum. Nam manifestum 
 est, quod ccelibatiis non sit verbo dei prseceptus ; manifestum 
 etiam est, . . . quod non est sentiendum, quod hoc genus 
 vitse per se sit coram tribunali dei excellentius et sanctius, 
 quam conjugium. . . . Qui vovet virginitatem vel ccelibatum
 
 212 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 aut vovet eum, ut singularem cultum del : tune quia status 
 coelibum non est verbo del mandatus, pertinet hoc votum ad 
 mandata hominum cet. ; aut vovet eum, ut meritum reniis- 
 sionis peccatorum et vitas aeternae, et tune est manifeste 
 impium votum. . . . Aut possides facultates et voves te iis 
 relictis acturum vitam pauperem, ut victum quaeras mendi- 
 citate et consequaris hujus voti merito vitam aeternani : tune 
 hoc votum primum quidem pugnat cum caritate proximi, quae 
 exigit, ne cui sis praeter necessitatem mendicimonio molestus ; 
 deinde pugnat cum fide in Christum, quod is solus sit meritum 
 seternse vitse. . . . Facultates autem tuas sic deserere, ut eas 
 in commune conferas, non est paupertatem sectari, sed de 
 certiori et copiosiori victu tibi prospicere. . . . Obedientia aut 
 refertur ad deum, tune non est arbitrarii voti, sed debitse 
 necessitatis ; . . . aut refertur ad hominem, tune sua sunt 
 obedientise officia, quae subditus magistratui, liberi parentibus 
 cet. debent. Haec sive voveantur sive non voveantur, certe 
 divinitus exiguntur. Vovere autem homini obedientiam sine 
 certa vocatione dei, ut operibus talis obedientiae non solum 
 prasstes deo singularem cultum, sed etiam expies coram deo 
 peccata tuo, supervacaneum est et impium, quia solius Ch. 
 obedientia expiavit peccata nostra cet. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii c. 18 : Cum sciamus certo, monachos et 
 monachorum ordines vel sectas neque a Christo, neque ab 
 apostolis esse institutas, docemus, nihil eas ecclesiae dei utiles 
 esse, imo perniciosas. Conf. Tetrapol. c. 12 ; Conf. Helv. i 
 art. 27 ; Conf. Gall. art. 24. 
 
 Cf. Zwingli, Op. iii p. 276 sqq. ; Calvin, Instit. iv. 13. 8 
 sqq. ; Limborch, Theol. chr. v. 76. 15 sqq. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The doctrine of vows generally is not to be sought so much in the 
 Protestant symbols as in the private writings of Luther and Calvin. 
 There are licita vota (cf. Declar. Thorun. p. 57) : these must, accord- 
 ing to A. C. p. 34, be in re possibili, voluntarium, sjjonte et comulto 
 conceptum, and of things especially not forbidden by the divine law. 
 The use of such vows is only moral, and consequently subjective ; 
 they must never be held for part of the divine service, or be under- 
 taken to prepare for or merit grace. As cultus divinus must that 
 vow only be reckoned which belongs to baptism. It is to this restric-
 
 THE HOLINESS OF THE REGENERATE. 213 
 
 tion that the negation of the Cone. Trid. sess. vi. de Baptism, refers : 
 Si quis dixerit, ita revocandosesse homines ad baptismi suscepti 
 memoriam, ut vota omnia, qua; post baptismum fiunt, vi promissionis 
 in baptismo ipso jam facta8 irrita esse intelligant, quasi per ea et fidei, 
 quam professi sunt, detrahatur et ipsi baptismo, anathema sit. Bellar- 
 mine lays down the general principle of his Church thus : Omne, 
 quod fit ex voto, etiamsi alioqui non sit a deo prasceptum, vere et 
 proprie est cultus dei.
 
 XIL 
 
 LOSS OF GBACE : MOKTAL AND VENIAL SINS, 
 
 POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 ALL Christian Confessions which reject the dogma of predes- 
 tination agree in this, that the converted man, in whom the 
 evil concupiscence is not perfectly extinguished, may sink 
 again into the condition of the unconverted, and lose even for 
 ever the grace obtained in justification. It has been usual, 
 in theological language, to term those sins which are fatal to 
 a state of grace mortal sins, peccata mortalia, or mortifera. 
 But here there is a divergence : 1. As to whether mortal sins 
 may co-exist with faith, or ipso facto exclude faith : the former 
 is asserted by the Eomanists ; the latter by the Protestants, in 
 harmony with their respective differences as to the nature of 
 faith, 2. Whether venial sins, peccata venialia, are venial in 
 themselves (ex iiaiurd sud, ex fundamento material^), which the 
 Roman theologians maintain, or in themselves deserve eternal 
 death, but are to Christians on account of their faith forgiven 
 by God, which is the Protestant doctrine. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 a. The Dcfeclibility of Justification. 
 
 I. ROMAN, LUTHERAN, AND ARMINIAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 15 : Assercndum est, . . . quocun- 
 que mortali peccato . . . acceptam justificationis gratiain 
 amitti. Cf. can. 23 ; Bellarmin, Juslific. iii. 14 sq. 
 
 214
 
 LOSS OF GKACE: MORTAL AND VENIAL SINS. 215 
 
 Conf. orth. p. 280 : 'H roiavTr) cTriOufiia (Oavdo-ipov djjidp- 
 Trjfui) ^e^copl^ei, rbv avOpwrrov diro Tr\v %dpiv rov Oeov KOL <f>ovevei 
 rov, d(f>' ov 7r\rjpQ)0y /ie TO ep<yov. Of. p. 283. 
 
 A. G. p. 13 : Damnant Anabaptistas, qui negant, semel 
 justificatos posse amittere Spiritum sanctum. 
 
 F. Cone. p. 705 : Falsa ilia opinio graviter redarguenda 
 atque rejicienda est, quod quidam fingunt, fidem et acceptam 
 justitiam atque salutem non posse ullis peccatis aut sceleribus 
 . . . amitti. 
 
 76. p. 591: Damnamus dogma illud, quod fides in Christum 
 non amittatur et Spiritus sanctus nihilominus in homine 
 habitet, etiamsi sciens volensque peccet et quod sancti atque 
 electi Spiritum sanctum retineant, tametsi in adulterium aut 
 in alia scelera prolabantur et in iis perseverent. 
 
 Conf. Eemonstr. xi. 7 : Fieri omnino posse, imo non raro 
 factum esse credimus, ut (renati) paulatim relabantur ad 
 pristinam vitae profanitatem et tandem etiam a priori fide et 
 caritate sua" plane deficiant desertaque via justitise ad pristina, 
 qua3 vere reliquerant, mundi inquinamenta . . . revertantur, 
 . . . et sic totaliter tandemque etiam finaliter . . . divina 
 gratia excidant. Cf. xviii. 6 ; Apol. Confess, p. 1 3 3 sqq. ; Lim- 
 borch, Theol. chr. lib. v. cap. 8 1. 1 Here belongs the Arminian 
 contradiction of the sentence that the regenerate commit no 
 mortal sins. Curcell Instit. iv. 4. 19. Limborch, TJicol. 
 christ. v. 4. 21. 
 
 Socin. biblioth. fratr. Pol. i p. 604 a: Si eveniat, ut ab hac 
 obedientia deficiamus et in unum plurave peccata relabamur, 
 in eisque permaneamus, justificati esse desinimus. 
 
 II. EEFORMED. 
 
 Calvin, Instit. iii. 2. 12 : Hoc tenendum est, quantumvis 
 exigua sit ac debilis in electis fides, quia tamen spiritus dei 
 certa illis arrha est ac sigillum suse adoptionis, nunquam ex 
 eorum cordibus deleri posse ejus sculpturam. 21 : Asserimus, 
 fidei radicem nunquam e pio pectore avelli, quin ima in parte 
 
 1 In the 5 Artie, the matter is left doubtful : utrum regeniti et rursus deficere 
 possint, prius ex scripturS, diligentius et accuratius inquirendum esse, quam id 
 sine dubitatione alii doceantur.
 
 216 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 defixa hsereat, utcunque decussa hue aut illuc inclinare videatur, 
 ejus lumen ita nunquam exstingui aut praefocari, quin saltern 
 velut sub favilla delitescat. Cf. Parei, Corp. doctr. p. 49. 
 
 Can. Dordrac. v. 3 : Propter peccati inhabitants reliquias 
 . . . non possent conversi in gratia perstare, si suis viribus 
 permitterentur. Sed fidelis est deus, qui ipsos in gratia semel 
 collata misericorditer confirrnat et in eadem usque ad finem 
 potenter conservat. . . . 4 : Etsi autem ilia potentia dei major 
 est, quam quse a carne superari possit, non semper tamen con- 
 versi ita a deo aguntur et moventur, ut non possint in quibus- 
 dam actionibus particularibus a ductu gratiss suo vitio recedere 
 et a carnis ooncupiscentiis seduci iisque obsequi. In peccata 
 etiam gravia et atrocia abripi possunt. . . . 5 : Talibus autem 
 enormibus peccatis deum valde offendunt, reatum mortis incur- 
 runt, Spiritum s. contristant, fidei exercitium interrumpunt, 
 conscientiam gravissime vulnerant, sensum gratise nonnunquam 
 ad tempus amittunt, donee per seriam resipiscentiam in viani 
 revertentibus paternus dei vultus rursum affulgeat. 
 
 Ib. v. 6 : Deus ex immutabili electionis proposito Spiritum 
 sanctum etiam in tristibus lapsibus a suis non prorsus aufert 
 nee eo usque prolabi sinit, ut gratia adoptionis ac justifica- 
 tionis statu excidant aut peccatum ad mortem sive in Spiritum 
 sanctum committant et ab eo penitus deserti in exitium aster- 
 num sese prsecipitent. v. 8 : Ex gratuita dei misericordia id 
 obtinent (electi), ut nee totaliter fide et gratia excidant, nee 
 finaliter in lapsibus maneant. Cf. Eejectio errorum 3, 4, 8, 
 Dcclar. Thorun. ii. 4. 11. 
 
 Heidegger, Corp. xxiv. 57 : Eegenitorum status prorsus 
 immutabilis est, quia regeneratio unica est et semen ejus in 
 regenitis sic manet, ut peccare seu peccata semen regenera- 
 tionis excutientia et condemnantia committere, adeoque finaliter 
 vel etiam totaliter deficere non possint. . . . Hoc enim criterio 
 regeniti ab irregenitis discernuntur . . . ; in regenito semper 
 aliquid latet, quod manum injicit, ut a peccando retrahat. 
 Semen igitur hoc indelebilis character et hereditatis arrhabo 
 est, quo renati ad redemtionem obsignantur. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxvii. sec. 1 : Sacraments are holy signs 
 and seals of the covenant of grace, immediately instituted by 
 God, to represent Christ and His benefits, and to . confirm our
 
 LOSS OF GKACE : MORTAL AND VENIAL SINS. 2 .1 7 
 
 interest in Him ; as also to put a visible difference between 
 those that belong unto the Church and the rest of the world ; 
 and solemnly to engage them to the service of God in Christ, 
 according to His word. Sec. 2 : There is in every sacra- 
 ment a spiritual relation, or sacramental union, between the 
 sign and the thing signified ; whence it comes to pass, that 
 the names and effects of the one are attributed to the other. 
 Sec. 3 : The grace which is exhibited in or by the sacraments, 
 rightly used, is not conferred by any power in them ; neither 
 doth the efficacy of a sacrament depend upon the piety or 
 intention of him that doth administer it, but upon the work of 
 the Spirit, and the word of institution ; which contains, to- 
 gether with a precept authorizing the use thereof, a promise 
 of benefit to worthy receivers. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The point of contention between the advocates of universal and 
 particular redemption is in the above references of the F. C. and the 
 Can. Dordr. correctly and definitely exhibited. That, namely, the 
 truly elect cannot possibly fall for ever from grace, is acknowledged 
 also by the Form. Cone. ; for they were elected in the divine pre- 
 vision of their unchangeable faith. But whether all who once truly 
 believed and were justified are simply assured of their faith, and con- 
 sequently of their justification, even though they fall into deadly sin, 
 is here the vital question. The Particularists answer that question 
 in the affirmative, and regard faith and the Holy Ghost as some- 
 what that cannot be entirely lost even in sin, that is, as a character 
 indelebilis of the elect. This system has no place for sins that destroy 
 and root out faith. Here we may refer what is said in Conf. Gall. 
 21 : fidem electis dari, non ut semel tantum in rectam viam intro- 
 ducantur, quin potius ut in esi ad extremum usque pergant cet. In the 
 scientific theology of the Keformed Church this is now always treated 
 under the rubric Perseverantia sanctorum. Cf. Baumgarten, Polem. 
 ii. 633 ; Schubert, Theol. Polem. iii. 302 ; Limborch, Th. chr. v. 80. 
 
 III. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers admit that the " possibility of sinning " abides 
 in the regenerate "in some part where the mind doth not 
 most diligently and watchfully attend unto the Lord." But 
 they regard it as possible to attain a state in which sin is 
 excluded.
 
 218 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop, viii : In whom this pure and holy 
 birth is fully brought forth, the body of death and sin comes 
 to be crucified and removed, and their hearts united and sub- 
 jected to the truth ; so as not to obey any suggestions or 
 temptations of the evil one, and to be free from actual sinning 
 and transgressing of the law of God, and in that respect per- 
 fect. Yet doth this perfection still admit of a growth ; and 
 there remaineth always in some part a possibility of sinning, 
 where the mind doth not most diligently and watchfully 
 attend unto the Lord. . . . Prop. ix. : Although this gift and 
 inward grace of God be sufficient to work out salvation, yet in 
 those in whom it is resisted it both may and doth become their 
 condemnation. Moreover, they in whose hearts it hath wrought 
 in part to purify and sanctify them in order to their further 
 perfection, may by disobedience fall from it, turn to wanton- 
 ness, Jude 4; make shipwreck of faith, 1 Tim. i. 19; and, after 
 having tasted the heavenly gift, and been made partakers of the 
 Holy Ghost, again fall away, Heb. vi 4, 5, 6. Yet such an 
 increase and stability in the truth may in this life be attained, 
 from which there can be no total apostasy. 
 
 b. Relation of Mortal Sins to Faith. 
 L EOMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 1 5 : Asserendum est, non modo 
 infidelitate, per quam et ipsa fides amittitur, sed etiam quo- 
 cunque alio mortali peccato, quamvis non amittatur fides, 
 acceptam justificationis gratiam amitti cet. 
 
 Ib. can. 27 : Si quis dixerit, nullum essemortale peccatum, 
 nisi infidelitatis aut nullo alio, quantumvis gravi et enormi 
 praeterquam infidelitatis peccato semel acceptam gratiam 
 amitti, anath. sit. 
 
 Ib. can. 28 : Si quis dix., amissa per peccatum gratia, simul 
 et fidem semper amitti, . . . a. s. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 71 : Fides non stat cum peccato mortali. 
 Ib. p. 86 : Fides ilia, quae accipit remissionem peccatorum,
 
 LOSS OF GRACE: MORTAL AND VENIAL SINS. 219 
 
 . . . non manet in Ms, qui obtemperant cupiditatibus, nee 
 exsistit cum mortal! peccato. Comp. p. 291, and Conf. -Saxon. 
 p. 67. 
 
 (Luther, Captiv. Idbyl. : Christianus volens non potest per- 
 dere salutem suam quantiscunque peccatis, nisi nolit credere. 
 Nulla enim peccata eum possunt damnare nisi sola in- 
 credulitas.) 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The Roman definition of mortal sin runs thus : quas sunt contraria 
 caritati dei et proximi (cf. also Conf. orthod.~). The Protestant thus : 
 quae fidem excutiunt. The Roman casuists reckoned a series of mortal 
 sins ; so also the Conf. orthod. p. 284. 
 
 c. Venial Sins, and their Proper Nature. 
 
 I. EOMAN AND GREEK. 
 
 The Concil. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 1 2 defines peccata venialia as 
 levia et guotidiana, on account of which we do not cease to be 
 just, and leaves it optional whether they are to be confessed 
 or not. Nothing is said as to the nature of such sins. But 
 Bellarmine, De amiss, gr., following the schoolmen, gives a 
 more definite theory ; as thus : Sess. xiv. cap. 5, cf. Cat. Bom. 
 ii. 5. 46 : 1. Peccatum ven. ex naturd sud distingui a mortali, 
 ac sine ulla relatione vel ad prsedestinationem vel ad miseri- 
 cordiam dei vel ad statum renatorum esse ejusmodi, ut poenam 
 quidem mereatur sed non seternam. 2. These peccata ven., 
 which proprie and absolute are opposed to peccatis mortal., 
 are either venialia ex genere suo (quse habent pro objecto rem 
 malam et inordinatam, sed quse caritati dei vel proximi non 
 repugnet, v. c. verbum otiosum) or ven. ex imperfectione 
 operis, i.e. (a) quse non sunt perfects voluntaria v. c. subiti 
 motus cupiditatis, irse cet. (6) quse in re parva" ac levi commit- 
 tuntur v. c. furtum unius oboli. Cf. Bellarmin, Eccles. milit. 
 c. 2 ; Mohler, neue Untersuch. S. 209 ff. 
 
 Conf. orth. p. 305, merely says : a^aprLa a-v^^vwurrj elvai 
 eKGivr), rrjv OTroiav ov$eva<; avOpwiros rjfJLTTopei va tyvyr), e'f&> a?ro 
 TOV XpicrTbv Kal TTjV TrapQivov Maplav fJia Sev /ia<> crrepevet
 
 220 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 OTTO rrjv X^P IV T v @ e t> (M]T pas Ka6vTro/3d\\et, et? rov aiaviov 
 Odvarov. 
 
 II PROTESTANT. 
 
 The Protestant counter-statements, which are to be found 
 rather in the writings of the Reformers than in the symbols, 1 
 are as follows : In the unregenerate there are no venial sins ; 
 and in the regenerate these sins are not in themselves or ex 
 naturd sud venial. Every sin deserves from God eternal 
 death, but for Christ's sake a portion of our sins are forgiven 
 graciously ; that is, those which are consistent with the exist- 
 ence of faith, inasmuch as by faith we are justified. But with 
 faith can coexist only unpremeditated sins: these, therefore, are 
 the pcccata venialia; and the difference between them and 
 peccata mortalia 2 is not in the matter of the sin itself, but in 
 the spirit and thought of the sinner in the formalis qualitas 
 subfcctiva peccantium. Cf. Melanc. Loci, i. 271 ; Chemnic. 
 Ex. i 10 ; Calvin, Institt. il 8, Decl. Tlwrun. 2,3. As to the 
 objection urged against Protestants, that they made all sins 
 equal, vid. Helv. ii 8 ; Calvin, Institt. ii. 8. 58. 
 
 III. ARMINIAN. 
 
 The Conf. Bern. vii. 6 gives no exact point of connection 
 here. But the Arminian theologians, although opposed in a 
 certain sense to the Calvinists on the question, by no means 
 agree with the Romanists that venial sins are in themselves, 
 and therefore in the unregenerate, venial. Curcell. Instil, iv. 4. 
 18 : Animadvertendum est, nullum fingi posse peccatum tarn 
 exiguum, quod deus, si vellet cum hominibus summo jure 
 agere, non posset exclusione e regno ccelorum punire. 20 : 
 Dico, peccata venialia esse leviora ilia, ad quse deus in gratuito 
 suo fcedcre connivere decrevit, etiamsi in ilia subinde per in- 
 
 1 Helv. ii. cap. 8 : The distribution into peccata mortalia and venialia occurs 
 only in passing. 
 
 2 Luther, Gal. c. v. : Peccatum distinguitur in mortale et veniale, non ob 
 substantiam facti sed personam, non juxta differentiam pcccatorum admissorum 
 sed peccatorum ea committentium.
 
 LOSS OF GRACE : MOETAL AND VENIAL SIXS. 221 
 
 firmitatem aut incogitantiam labamur et eorum habitum non 
 plane exuerimus ; . . . talibus enim peccatis fideles plerumque 
 in hac vita obnoxios esse testatur scriptura. Cf. a. Limborch, 
 Theol. christ. v. 4. 20 sqq. In entire harmony with this is the 
 positive teaching of Apol. Conf. Eem. on this subject.
 
 XIII 
 
 THE MEANS OF GKACE : THE WORD OF GOD, 
 
 BOMAXISTS and Protestants agree in regarding as the ordinary 
 means, appointed in the church, through which the grace of 
 God in Christ flows to man, the word of God, as it is pro- 
 claimed in the church or read in the Scriptures, and the 
 sacraments. The Socinians and Mennonites include only the 
 word. The Quakers, even the older Anabaptists, are of 
 opinion that the Holy Ghost enlightens man without the word 
 immediately by an internal light ; every man in this matter 
 having his day of visitation, when this internal light, if rightly 
 used, enables him to apprehend the word of God, which other- 
 wise is only a dead letter. 
 
 The mutual relations of word and sacrament are not de- 
 finitely treated in the symbols of the Protestant Church. 
 But we must not omit what is found in Conf. Helv. ii c. 19 : 
 Verbum dei habetur instar tabularum vel literarum, sacramenta 
 vero instar sigillorum, qua3 literis deus appendit solus. How 
 far the Eomau Catholic Church exalts the sacraments above 
 the word may be seen in Nitzsch, Stud. 1834, iv. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. EOMAN. 
 
 The Eoman Catholic symbols speak only by the way of 
 the verbum Dei. The Cat. Bom. calls it cibus animi (iv. 13. 
 18), and places it by the side of the sacraments (ii. 1. 32). 
 However, this is understood primarily of the preaching of the 
 
 222
 
 THE MEANS OF GRACE : THE WOKD OF GOD. 223 
 
 word, which in the Cone. Trid. sess. vi. cap. 6 is mentioned 
 only among the preparatory means of conversion ; and in sess. 
 xxiv. cap. 4 is imposed on bishops as a duty adfidelium salutem. 
 The reading of the written word of God is, as observed above, 
 to say thejleast, not favoured by the Eoman Catholic Church. 
 
 II. PKOTESTANT. 
 
 A. C. p. 11: Per verbum et sacramenta, tanquam per in- 
 strumenta donatur Spir. s., qui fidem efficit, ubi et quando 
 visum est deo, in iis, qui audiunt evangelium cet. Damnant 
 Anabaptistas et alios, qui sentiunt, Spiritum s. contingere sine 
 verbo. externo hominibus per ipsorum prseparationes et opera. 
 Cf. Apol. A. 0. p. 268. 
 
 Cat. maj. p. 426 : Dei verbum thesaurus ille et gaza est 
 pretiosissima, quae omnia sanctificat, cujus adminiculo etiam 
 ipsi sancti omnes sanctimoniam consecuti sunt. Jam qua- 
 cunque bora* verbum dei docetur, auditur, legitur, consideratur 
 aut repetitur memoria, ea hujus tractatione audientis persona, 
 dies et opus sanctificatur, non externi quidem operis gratia, 
 sed propter verbum, quo omnes nos sancti reddimur et effi- 
 cimur. /&. p. 502 : Qui (Spiritus s.) quotidie nos divini 
 verbi prsedicatione attrahit et adsciscit fidemque impertit, 
 auget atque corroborat, per verbum illud et remissionem pec- 
 catorum, tit nos . . . prorsus per omnia sanctos faciat, id quod 
 jam per verbum in fide exspectamus. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 331 : Constanter tenendum est, deum nemini 
 spiritum vel gratiam suam largiri nisi per verbum et cum 
 verbo externo et praecedente, ut ita prsemuniamus nos adver- 
 sum enthusiastas i. e. spiritus, qui jactitant se ante verbum et 
 sine verbo spiritum habere. [P. 333 : Quare in hoc nobis est 
 constanter perseverandum, quod Deus non velit nobiscum 
 aliter agere, nisi per vocale verbum et sacramenta, et quod, 
 quidquid sine verbo et sacramentis jactatur, ut spiritus, sit 
 ipse diabolus. Nam Deus etiam Mosi voluit apparere per 
 rubum ardendum et vocale verbum. Et nullus propheta, sive 
 Elias sive Elisaeus, Spiritum sine Decalogo sive verbo vocali 
 accepit.] 
 
 F. C. p. 670 : Prsedicatio verbi dei et ejusdem auscultatio
 
 224 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 sunt Sp. s. instrumenta, cum quibus et per quae efficaciter 
 agere et homines ad deum convertere atque in ipsis et velle 
 et perficere operari vult. Cf. p. 671: Per prsedicationem 
 t auditionem verbi deus operatur, emollit corda nostra tra- 
 hitque hominem cet. Etsi autem utrumque, turn conciona- 
 toris plantare et rigare, turn auditoris currere et velle frustra 
 omnino essent neque conversio sequeretur, nisi S. s. virtus et 
 operatic accederet, qui per verbum prsedicatum et auditum 
 corda illuminat et convertit, ut' homines verbo credere et as- 
 sentiri possint: tamen neque concionator neque auditor de 
 hac Sp. s. gratia et operatione dubitare debent. P. 818: 
 Ad conciones itaque sacras miseri peccatores conveniant, ver- 
 bum dei accurata diligentia audiant neque dubitent, quin pater 
 eos ad filium suum sit pertracturus. Spiritus enim sanctus 
 virtute sua ministerio adesse et per illud ad horn, salutem vult 
 operari. Et hie est tractus ille patris, de quo sacras lit. loquuntur. 
 Ib. p. 581 : Eejicimus enthusiastarum errorem, qui fin- 
 gunt, deum immediate absque verbi dei auditu et sine sacra- 
 mentorum usu homines ad se trahere, illuminare, justificare et 
 salvare. 
 
 Conf. Hdv. ii. cap. 1 : Cum hodie dei verbum per prsedica- 
 tores legitime vocatos annuntiatur in ecclesia, credimus, ipsum 
 dei verbum annuntiari et a fidelibus recipi, neque aliud dei 
 verbum vel fingendum vel ccelitus esse exspectandum. Neque 
 arbitramur, prsedicationern illam externam tanquam inutilem 
 ideo videri, quoniam pendeat institutio verse religionis ab in- 
 terna spiritus illuminatione. Quanquam enim nemo veniat 
 ad Christum, nisi trahatur a patre ccelesti ac intus illuminetur 
 per spiritum, scimus tamen, deum omnino velle prsedicari ver- 
 bum dei, etiam foris. Equidem potuisset per spiritum suum 
 sanctum aut per ministerium angeli absque ministerio sancti 
 Petri instituisse Cornelium in Actis deus, ceterum rejicit hunc 
 nihilominus ad Petrum. Agnoscimus interim, deum illumi- 
 nare posse homines etiam sine externo ministerio, quos et 
 quando velit, id quod ejus potentia3 est. Nos autem loquimur 
 de usitata ratione instituendi homines, et prascepto et exemplo 
 tradita nobis a deo. Cap. 1 8 : Credamus, deum verbo suo 
 nos docere foris per ministros suos, intus autem et commovere 
 electorum suonun corda ad fidem per Spir. s.
 
 THE MEANS OF GKACE : THE WORD OF GOD. 225 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 24 : Credinras, veram fidem per auditum 
 verbi del et Sp. sancti operationem homini insitam eum re- 
 generare. 
 
 Cat. Heid. FT. 65 (Germ.): Whence comes saving faith? 
 It is wrought by the Holy Ghost in our hearts through the 
 preaching of the holy gospel, and He confirms it by the use of 
 the sacraments. Against the enthusiasts or mystics see Calv. 
 Tnstitt. i. 9, on the Word as the means of the Divine Call. 
 
 Conf. Eemonstr. xvii. 2 : Efficitur et perficitur vocatio per 
 praedicationem evangelii eique adjunctam virtutem Spiritus 
 sancti. 8 : Spiritus s. omnibus et singulis, quibus verbum 
 fidei ordinarie prsedicatur, tantum gratiee confert, aut saltern 
 conferre paratus est, quantum ad fidem ingenerandum et ad 
 promovendum suis gradibus salutarem ipsorum conversionem 
 sufficit. . . . 
 
 Apol. Conf. p. 1 5 9 b : Verba : quibus verb. . . . prcedica- 
 tur addita sunt a Remonstrantibus, . . . ut significarent, se ex- 
 traordinarias dei vocationes in computum hunc recensere nolle, 
 in quibus fieri potest, ut deus excellentiore et nobiliore aliqua 
 virtute quosdam vocatos dignetur, inpr. eos, quorum opera ad 
 aliorum hominum conversionem uti vult. Cf. Limborch, Thcol. 
 Christ, iv. 13. 20. 
 
 III. SOCINIAN. 
 
 As to the Socinian theory, the Cat. Eacov. distinguishes in 
 the conversion of men a duplex auxilium dei: an ext&rius, 
 consisting in the promises and threatenings of the New Testa- 
 ment ; and an interius, when God by His Spirit more and 
 more writes and seals what He promised in the hearts of the 
 faithful. This influence of the Holy Spirit has not only the 
 substance of the divine word for its object and material, but 
 is strictly connected with it. Then comes into view also what 
 the Cat. Eacov., p. 251, says of the perpetual gift of the Spirit : 
 " It is an afflatus of God, by which our minds are filled either 
 with a richer knowledge of divine things, or with a more cer- 
 tain hope of eternal life, and consequently with a joy and 
 relish in the prospect of future blessedness. This hope of 
 eternal life, indeed, we conceive through the preaching of the 
 
 P
 
 226 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 gospel ; "but it seems to be necessary, in order to implant in 
 the mind a firmer and more certain hope, that the promise ex- 
 ternally set forth in the Gospels should be internally sealed by 
 the Holy Spirit in our hearts." Ostorodt, Unterricht. c. 34, 
 expressly declares that this ordinary and regular influence of 
 the Divine Spirit does not exclude one that is extraordinary 
 on individual men. 
 
 In the Confessions of the Mennonites there are no express 
 clauses touching the word of God as the means of grace. But 
 this Conf, 20, says of faith that it is "a most certain appre- 
 hension and knowledge derived by the grace of God from the 
 Holy Scriptures." 
 
 IV. ARMINIAN. 
 
 The symbolical books do not enter into particulars as to 
 the connection between the word of God and the divine 
 energy. Against the Predestinarians, who distinguish between 
 the power of the Holy Ghost as only operative in the elect, and 
 the word of God, in fact separating off that power as a specific 
 element (see Calvin, Institt. iv. 14. 10), Arminianism maintains 
 an inseparable union between the influence of the Spirit and the 
 divine word. Limborch, Theol. clirist. iv. 12 : Externa vocatio 
 dei fit per externum dei verbum vel ore prolatum vel scripto 
 traditum. . . . Interna vocatio est, quse fit per spir. dei, qui 
 in corda hominum influens ea movet, excitat et exstimulat, ut 
 vocation! externae per verbum factae obtemperent. Hoec autem 
 int. vocatio non est virtus sp. seorsim operans a verbo, sed per 
 verbum et verbo semper inest, adeo ut revera una eadeinque 
 sit vocatio, sed quse secundum diversos respectus vocatur ex- 
 terna et interna. Quia enim spir. nunquam operatur absque 
 verbo neque verbum unquam destitutum est spiritu, hinc qui 
 verbo vocantur, etiam spiritu, quantum ad conversionem et 
 fidem sufficit, donantur. . . . Non dicimus duas esse (verbi et 
 spiritus) actiones specie distinctas, sed unam eandemque ac- 
 tionem, quoniam verbum est spiritus, h. e. spiritus verbo inest 
 verbumque propterea spiritualem nos convertendi vim habet. 
 Et quaecunque hie sit spiritus actio, ea alia non esse videtur, 
 quam sensus ex verbo percepti validior in mente hominis im-
 
 THE MEANS OF GRACE : THE WORD OF GOD. 227 
 
 pressio, quo et de officio suo et magnitudine ac certitudine 
 divinorum promissorum plenius persuasus excitatur ad fidem 
 et perpetuum sanctimonias studium. Similarly, the older 
 Lutheran theologians, and with the same true instinct, main- 
 tained Spiritum sanctum cum verbo dei indivulse conjunctum 
 esse. 
 
 Law and Gospel. 
 
 The Protestant symbols, noting the manner and process of 
 individual renewal as effected through the instrumentality of 
 the word of God, not only distinguish between the two con- 
 stituents of the divine word, commandments and promises, 
 terming the former as a whole the Law, 1 and the latter the 
 Gospel, 2 but they also define the influence which each exerts 
 on conversion, and the value which the law as such has for 
 the regenerate, a point to which the Lutheran divines were 
 directed by the antinomistic controversies. 
 
 I. PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 6 : Universa scriptura in hos duos locos 
 prsecipuos distribui debet, in legem et promissiones. Alias 
 enim legem tradit, alias tradit promissionem de Christo, vide- 
 licet, cum aut promittit Christum venturum esse et pollicetur 
 propter eum remissionem peccatorum, justificationem et vitam 
 seternam, aut in evangelio Christus, postquam apparuit, pro- 
 mittit remissionem peccatorum, justificationem et vitam seter- 
 nam. Vocamus autem legem in hac disputatione decalogi 
 
 1 The foundation of the law, the substance and compend of the divine com- 
 mandments, is the Decalogue : Apol. A. C. 60 ; Helv. ii. c. 12. As to the 
 division of this into ten precepts, there was between the Lutherans and the Re- 
 formed (Calvin, Inslltt. ii. 8) the same difference as that between the Roman 
 and the Greek Churches. This has been expressed in the symbolical catechisms. 
 Against the Roman and Lutheran distribution there is a circumstantial protest 
 in Cat. Hac. p. 176. 
 
 2 This is the distinction which has been predominant, and has entered into the 
 symbols. It is scarcely of any moment that Luther in the Greater Catechism 
 says prcecepta et fides instead of lex et evangelium ; and the designation lex for 
 the whole of the Old Testament is peculiar to the Artt. Smalc. p. 318.
 
 228 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 praecepta, ubicunque ilia in scripturis leguntur ; de ceremoniis 
 et judicialibus legibus Moisi in praesentia nihil loquimur. 
 
 Ib. p. 170 : Haac sunt duo praacipua opera del in homini- 
 bus, perterrefacere et justificare ac vivificare perterrefactos. In 
 haac duo opera distributa est universa scriptura. Altera pars 
 lex est, quaa ostendit, arguit et condemnat peccata. Altera 
 pars evangelium, hoc est promissio gratiaa in Christo donataa, 
 et haac promissio subinde repetitur in tota scriptura, primum 
 tradita Adse postea patriarchis, deinde a prophetis illustrata, 
 postremo prsedicata et exhibita a Christo inter Judaaos, et ab 
 apostolis sparsa in totum mundum. Cf. pp. 68, 166. 1 
 
 A. Sm. p. 319 sq: Praacipuum officium et evepyeia legis 
 est, ut peccatum originale et omnes fructus ejus revelet et 
 homini ostendat, quam horrendum in modum natura ejus lapsa 
 sit et funditus ac totaliter depravata, ita ut lex ei dicat, hoini- 
 nem nee habere nee curare deum et adorare alienos deos, id 
 quod antea et sine lege homo non credidisset. Hac ratione 
 perterrefit, humiliatur, prosternitur, desperat de se ipso, et 
 anxie desiderat auxiliuni nee scit, quod fugiat, incipit irasci 
 deo et obmurmurare prae impatientia. Hoc officium legis 
 retinetur in N. T., et in eo exercetur. Huic officio Novum 
 Test, statim adjungit consolationem et promissionem gratiae 
 evangelii, cui credendum est. 
 
 F. C. p. 592 : Credimus, legem esse proprie doctrinam 
 divinitus revelatam, quaa doceat, quid justum deoque gratum 
 flit; quaa etiam quicquid peccatum est et voluntati divinaa 
 adversatur, redarguat. . . . Quare, quicquid exstat in sacris 
 literis, quod peccata arguit, id revera ad legis concionem per- 
 tinet. Evangelion vero proprie doctrinam esse censemus, quaa 
 doceat, quid homo credere debeat, qui legi dei non satisfecit 
 et idcirco per eandem damnatur, videlicet, quod ilium credere 
 oporteat, Jesum Christum omnia peccata expiasse atque pro 
 iis satisfecisse et remissionem peccatorum, justitiam coram deo 
 consistentem et vitam aaternam, nullo interveniente peccatoris 
 illius merito, impetrasse. . . . Cum autem vocabulum (evan- 
 gelii) non semper in una eademque significatione in sacra 
 
 1 It is no contradiction, only another phraseology, when, Apol. p. 71, the 
 Evangelium is said arguere peccata. But this confession, which in the Conf. 
 Aug. is repeated, gare occasion for suspicion as to the changed text of the Conf.
 
 THE MEANS OF GKACE : THE WOED OF GOD. 229 
 
 scriptura usurpetur, docemus et confitemur, si vocabulum 
 (evangelii) de tota Christ! doctrina accipiatur, quam ipse in 
 ministerio suo (quemadmodum et ejus apostoli) professus est 
 (in qua significations Mrc. i. [15] et Act. xx. 24 vox ilia 
 usurpatur) recte dici et doceri, evangelium esse concionem de 
 poenitentia et remissione peccatorum. 
 
 II). p. 593: Etsi concio ilia de passione et morte Christi, 
 filii dei, severitatis et terroris plena est, quse iram dei adver- 
 sus peccata ostendit, unde demum homines ad legem dei pro- 
 pius adducuntur, postquam velum illud Moisis ablatum est, 
 ut tandem exacte agnoscant, quanta videlicet dominus in lege 
 sua a nobis exigat, quorum nihil nos praestare possumus, ita 
 ut universam nostram justitiam in solo Christo quserere opor- 
 teat : tamen, quam diu nobis Christi passio et mors iram dei 
 ob oculos ponunt et hominem perterrefaciunt, tarn diu non 
 sunt proprie concio evangelii, sed legis et Moisis doctrina, et 
 sunt alienum opus Christi, per quod accedit ad proprium suum 
 officium, quod est, prsedicare de gratia dei, consolari et vivifi- 
 care. Hsec propria sunt pKedicationis evangelicae. 
 
 IT), p. 595 : Credimus, etsi vere in Christum credentes et 
 sincere ad deum conversi a maledictione et coactione legis 
 per Christum liberati sunt, quod ii tamen propterea non sint 
 absque lege, quippe quos films dei earn ob causam redemit, ut 
 legem dei diu noctuque meditentur atque in ejus observations 
 sese assidue exerceant. . . . Credimus, concionem legis non 
 niodo apud eos, qui fidem in Christum non habent et pceniten- 
 tiam nondum agunt, sed etiam apud eos, qui vere in Christum 
 credunt, vere ad deum conversi et renati et per fidem justifi- 
 cati sunt, sedulo urgendam esse. . . . Etsi enim renati et 
 spiritu mentis suse renovati sunt, tamen regeneratio ilia et 
 renovatio in hac vita non est omnibus numeris absoluta, sed 
 duntaxat inchoata. Et credentes illi spiritu mentis suse per- 
 petuo luctantur cum carne, hoc est cum corrupta" natura, quse 
 in nobis ad mortem usque hseret. Et propter veterem Ada- 
 mum, qui adhuc in hominis intellectu, voluntate et in omni- 
 bus viribus ejus infixus residet, opus est, ut homini lex dei 
 semper prseluceat, ne quid privates devotionis affectu in negotio 
 religionis confingat et cultus divinos verbo dei non institutes 
 eligat ; item, ne vetus Adam pro suo ingenio agat, sed potius
 
 230 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 contra suam voluntatem, non modo admonitionibus et minis 
 legis, vemm etiam pcenis et plagis coerceatur, ut spiritui obse- 
 quatur seque ipsi captivnm tradat. 
 
 Ib. p. 596 : Ad hunc modum una eademque lex est manet- 
 que, immota videlicet del voluntas, sive pcenitentibus sive im- 
 pcenitentibus, renatis aut non renatis proponatur. Discrimen 
 autem, quoad obedientiam, duntaxat in hominibns est : quorum 
 alii non renati legi obedientiam qualemcunque a lege requisitam 
 prsestant, sed coacti et inviti id faciunt (sicut etiam renati 
 faciunt, quatenus adhuc carnales sunt) ; credentes vero in 
 Christum, quatenus renati sunt, absque coactione, libero et 
 spontaneo spiritu talem obedientiam prsestant, qualem alias 
 nullse quantumvis severissimse legis comminationes extorquere 
 possent 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii c. 13 : Evangelium opponitur legi. Nam 
 lex iram operatur et maledictionem annuntiat, evangelium 
 vero gratiam et benedictionem prsedicat. Quamvis patres 
 nostri in scripturis prophetarum habuerint evangelium, per 
 quod et salutem in Christo per fidem consecuti sunt, evan- 
 gelium tamen proprie illud dicitur laetum et felix nuntium, 
 quo nobis primum per Joannem baptistam, deinde per ipsum 
 Christum dominum, postea per apostolos ejus apostolorumque 
 successores prsedicatum est, mundo deum jam preestitisse, quod 
 ab exordio mundi promisit, ac misisse, imo donavisse nobis 
 filniTn unicum, et in hoc reconciliationem cum patre, remis- 
 sionem peccatorum, omnem plenitudinem et vitam seternam. 
 Historia ergo descripta a quatuor evangelistis, explicans quo- 
 modo hsec sint facto vel adimpleta a Christo, quse docuerit et 
 fecerit Christus, et quod in ipso credentes omnem habent pleni- 
 tudinem, recte nuncupatur evangelium. Prsedicatio item et 
 scriptura apostolica, qua nobis exponunt apostoli, quomodo 
 nobis a patre datus sit films et in hoc vitae salutisque omnia, 
 recte dicitur doctrina evangelica, sic ut ne hodie quidem, si 
 sincera sit, appellationem tarn prseclaram amittat. /&. 12 : 
 Docemus, legem non datam esse hominibus, ut ejus justificen- 
 tur observatione, sed ut ejus judicio infirmitatem potius, pecca- 
 tum atque condemnationem agnoscamus, et de viribus nostris 
 desperantes, convertamur ad Christum in fide. Hactenus 
 itaque abrogata est lex dei, quatenus nos amplius non damnat,
 
 THE MEANS OF GRACE : THE WOKD OF GOD. 231 
 
 nec iram in nobis operatur. Sumus enim sub grati&, et non 
 sub lege. Attamen legem non ideo fastidientes rejicimus. 
 Meminimus enim verborum domini discentis : non veni legem 
 et prophetas solvere, sed implere (Mt. v. 17). Scimus, lege 
 nobis tradi formulas virtutum atque vitiorum ; scimus, scrip- 
 turam legis, si exponatur per evangelium, eeclesise esse utilem, 
 et idcirco ejus lectionem non exterminandam esse ex ecclesia. 
 Gonf. Gall. art. 23 : Credimus, omnes legis figuras adventu 
 Jesu Christi sublatas esse, quamvis earum veritas et substantia 
 nobis in eo constet, in quo sunt omnes impletae. Legis tamen 
 doctrina et prophetis nobis utendum est, turn ad vitam nostram 
 formandam, turn ut eo magis in promissionibus evangelicis 
 confirmemur. Similarly Gonf. Belg. art. 25. Conf. Hungar. 
 (Czenger.) p. 157: Lex ad peccata arguenda et evangelium 
 propter annunciandam remissionem peccatorum prsedicandum 
 est. Neque enim pcenitentia pnedicari potest neque peccata 
 argui possunt sine lege. Compare, as to the use and obligation 
 of the Mosaic law for Christians, Calvin, Institt. ii. 7. 14; 
 Tliirty-nine Artt. vii Why the Predestinarians do not will- 
 ingly term the gospel a law, is shown in the Apol. Conf. Rem. 
 p. 143. 
 
 II. SOCINIANS. 
 
 The Socinians, who regard Judaism, like Christianity, as a 
 legislation based on divine promises, might, like the Protes- 
 tants generally, have distinguished their whole Bible into law 
 and gospel ; but they would not have placed the promises on 
 the same line with the commandments, and therefore used the 
 terms law and gospel for the Old and New Testaments respec- 
 tively. So also the Arminians: Curcell. Bel. ch. inst. v. 16 ; 
 Limborch, Th. ch. iii. 17. Among the Eomanists, Bellarmine, 
 Justif. iv. 2, in order to maintain the necessity of good works to 
 salvation, declares himself against the Protestant distinction 
 between law and gospel, and seeks (cap. 3 and 4) to give 
 another definition of these ideas. On the other hand, Plato, 
 Catech. S. 49, joins the Protestants here.
 
 XIV. 
 
 SACKAMENTS GENEEALLY. 
 
 FIRST POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 WITH the sole exception of the Quakers, who are opposed 
 to externality in religion, referring all to the life of the spirit, 
 and its only source the internal light, Christian communities 
 celebrate certain holy ordinances appointed by Christ Him- 
 self. But they differ as to the design of these institutions : 
 while the Romanists, Greeks, and the greater portion of Pro- 
 testants, regard them as means of grace, 1 the Arminians, 
 Mennonites, and some other Protestant communities, join the 
 Socinians in giving up the notion that they are directly such. 
 The older Socinians discerned in the sacraments, which they 
 preferred to call cerimonice, only external acts (prcecepta ceri- 
 monialia Christi), which primarily betoken a profession of the 
 Christian faith: the Christian man not receiving aught in 
 them, but rather doing something himself. The Arminians 
 and others, on the contrary, regard the sacraments as sacred 
 signs of Christian profession, and of grace promised by God ; 
 which signs as such exert a moral influence on the mind. 
 The Zwinglians teach in harmony with the Socinians. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers reject both the idea and the name of sacra- 
 ments. Barclay, Apol. Prop, xii., declares that the Scripture 
 
 1 As signs of profession, they are by these still regarded ; but this end is sub- 
 ordinate to their use as means of grace. 
 
 232
 
 SACRAMENTS GENERALLY. 233 
 
 names nothing the signature and pledge of our gospel inherit- 
 ance save the Spirit of God. Compare their Catechism, 
 where the baptism of Christ is distinguished from the water- 
 baptism of John as a baptism of the Holy Ghost ; and the 
 Lord's Supper is said, with allusion to Eom. xiv. 17, Col. 
 ii. 16-22, not to have been designed for perpetual observ- 
 ance. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop, xii : As there is one Lord, and one 
 Faith, so there is one Baptism ; which is not the putting away 
 of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience 
 before God, by the resurrection of Jesus Christ. And this 
 baptism is a pure and spiritual thing, to wit, the baptism of 
 the Spirit and fire, by which we are buried with Him, that, 
 being washed and purged from our sins, we may walk in new- 
 ness of life. Comm. sec. 6 : But to make water-baptism a 
 necessary institution of the Christian religion, which is pure 
 and spiritual, and not carnal and ceremonial, is to derogate 
 from the new covenant dispensation, and set up the legal rites 
 and ceremonies, of which this of baptism, or washing with 
 water, was one. 
 
 Prop. xiii. on the Eucharist : The communion of the body 
 and blood of Christ is inward and spiritual, which is the par- 
 ticipation of His flesh and blood, by which the inward man is 
 daily nourished in the hearts of those in whom Christ dwells. 
 Of which things the breaking of bread by Christ with His 
 disciples was a figure, which even they who had received the 
 substance used in the church for a time, for the sake of the 
 weak; even as abstaining from things strangled and from 
 blood, the washing one another's feet, and the anointing of 
 the sick with oil: all which are commanded with no less 
 authority and solemnity than the former [Baptism and the 
 Lord's Supper]; yet, seeing they are but shadows of better 
 things, they cease in such as have obtained the inheritance. 
 Comm. sec. 3 : So that the Supper of the Lord, and the 
 supping with the Lord, and partaking of His flesh and blood, 
 is no ways limited to the ceremony of breaking bread and 
 drinking wine at particular times, but is truly and really 
 enjoyed as often as the soul retires into the light of the Lord, 
 and feels and partakes of that heavenly life by which the
 
 234 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 inward man is nourished ; which may be and is often witnessed 
 by the faithful at all times. 
 
 II. ROMAN, GREEK, AND LUTHERAN. 
 
 Cone. Trident, sess. 7 : Sacramenta per quae omnis vera 
 justitia vel incipit vel ccepta augetur vel amissa reparatur. 
 
 Cat. Bom. ii. 1. 11 : Ut explicatius quid sacramentum sit 
 declaretur, docendum erit, rem esse sensibus subjectam, quae 
 ex dei institutione sanctitatis et justitiae turn significandae turn 
 efficiendse vim habet : ex quo sequitur, ut facile quivis possit 
 intelligere, imagines sanctorum, cruces et alia id genus, quamvis 
 sacrarum rerum signa sint, non ideo tamen sacramenta dicenda 
 esse. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 155: To (jLvo-rijpiov (Sacrament) elvai pLa 
 re\err) 97 OTTOIO, dirofcdra) el$ KCLTTOLOV elSo? -oparbv eivat air la 
 Kai <f>epei et9 TTJV ^rv^rjv rov Triarov rrjv doparov %dpiv rov 
 0eov' Stara%6ev VTTO rov Kvptov vfjuav, Bi ov eooro5 rwv martav 
 rrjv Beiav %apiv \ajif3dvet. 
 
 A. C. [P. 11 : Per verbum et sacramenta, tanquam per 
 instrumenta, donatur Spiritus sanctus, qui fidem efficit, ubi et 
 quando visum est Deo, in iis, qui audiunt evangelium.] P. 13 : 
 Sacramenta instituta sunt, non modo ut sint notae professions 
 inter homines, sed magis ut sint signa et testimonia voluntatis 
 dei erga nos ad excitandum et confirmandam fidem in his, qui 
 utuntur, proposita. 
 
 Apol. A. C. -p. 200 : Sacramenta vocamus ritus, qui habent 
 mandatum dei et quibus addita est promissio gratiae. Ib. p. 
 253 : Sacramentum est cerimonia vel opus, in quo deus nobis 
 exhibet hoc, quod offert annexa cerimoniae promissio. Cf. p. 
 267. 
 
 > 
 
 III. REFORMED. 
 
 Conf. Hefo. i art. 20 : Asserimus, sacramenta non solum 
 tesseras quasdam societatis chr., sed et gratiae div. symbola 
 esse, quibus ministri domino ad eum finem, quern ipse pro- 
 mittit, offert et efficit, co-operentur. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii c. 19: Sunt sacramenta symbola mystica vel
 
 SACKAMENTS GENEKALLY. 235 
 
 ritus sancti aut sacrse actiones a deo ipso institute, constantes 
 verbo suo, signis et rebus significatis, quibus in ecclesia summa 
 sua beneficia homini exhibita retinet in memoril et subinde 
 renovat, quibus item promissiones suas obsignat et quse ipse 
 nobis interius prsestat, exterius reprsesentat ac veluti oculis 
 contemplanda subjicit, adeoque fidem nostram, spiritu dei in 
 cordibus nostris operante, roborat et auget: quibus denique 
 nos ab omnibus aliis populis et religionibus separat sibique 
 soli consecrat et obligat, et quid a nobis requirat, significat. 
 Sacr. sunt rerum sacrarum symbola mystica, et signa et res 
 significatse inter se sacramentaliter conjunguntur, conjunguntur, 
 inquam, vel uniuntur per significationem mysticam et volun- 
 tatem vel consilium ejus, qui sacramenta instituit. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. xxv. : Sacraments ordained of Christ 
 be not only badges or tokens of Christian men's profession, but 
 rather they be certain sure witnesses and effectual signs of 
 grace, and God's goodwill towards us, by the which He doth 
 work invisibly in us, and doth not only quicken, but also 
 strengthen and confirm our faith in Him. 
 
 Conf. Scot. art. 21 : (Confitemur) sacramenta . . . non 
 tantum visibiliter inter populum dei et eos qui extra fcedus 
 sunt, distinguere, sed etiam fidem suorum filiorum exercere ; 
 et participationem eorundem sacramentorum in illorum cordi- 
 bus certitudinem promissionis ejus et felicissimee illius con- 
 junctionis, unionis et societatis, quam electi cum Ch. habent, 
 obsignare. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxvii. sec. 1 : Sacraments are holy signs 
 and seals of the covenant of grace, immediately instituted by 
 God, to represent Christ and His benefits, and to confirm our 
 interest in Him ; as also to put a visible difference between 
 those that belong unto the church and the rest of the world ; 
 and solemnly to engage them to the service of God in Christ, 
 according to His word. Sec. 2 : There is in every sacrament 
 a spiritual relation, or sacramental union, between the sign 
 and the thing signified; whence it comes to pass, that the 
 names and effects of the one are attributed to the other. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 34: Credimus, adjuncta esse verbo sacra- 
 menta amplioris confirmationis causa, gratise dei nimirum 
 pignora et tesseras, quibus infirmse et rudi fidei nostrse sub-
 
 236 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 veniatur. Fatemur enim, talia esse signa hsec exteriora, ut 
 deus per ilia sancti sui spiritus virtute operetur, ne quidquam 
 ibi frustra nobis significetur. 
 
 [Conf. Belgica, art. xxxiii.: Sunt sacramenta signa ac sym- 
 bola visibilia rerum internamm et invisibilium, per quae ceu 
 per media, Deus ipse virtute Spiritus sancti in nobis ope- 
 ratur.] 
 
 Heidelb. Cat. Fr. 66 : Sacraments are visible, sacred signs 
 and seals appointed of God, that in their use we may have the 
 promise of the gospel made clearer and sealed : to wit, that 
 God for the sake of the one oblation of Christ bestows on us 
 forgiveness of sins and eternal life. 
 
 Catecli. Genev. p. 519 : Sacramentum est externa divinse 
 erga nos benevolentise testificatio, quse visibili signo spirituales 
 gratias figurat ad obsignandas cordibus nostris dei promissiones, 
 quo earum virtus melius confirmetur. Vim et efficaciam 
 sacramenti non in externo elemento inclusam esse existimas, 
 sed totam a spiritu dei manare ? Sic sentio, nempe, ut vir- 
 tutem suam exercere domino placuerit per sua organa, quern 
 in finem ea destinavit. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 [The older Reformed Confessions, which were drawn up by Zwingli, 
 teach in another strain. Zwingli, Fid. Ratio ad Car. Rom. imper. No. 
 vii. : Credo, imo scio, omnia sacramenta tarn abesse, ut gratiam con- 
 ferant, ut ne adferant quidem aut dispensent. See Niemeyer, Coll. 
 S. 24. The doctrine afterwards taught, under the influence of Calvin, 
 may be summed under the following heads :] 1. They are Symbola 
 mystica. 2. They are signs of His grace, instituted of God: conse- 
 quently more than mere moral remembrances of the heavenly, bring- 
 ing it near, for these the church itself could have ordained. 3. They 
 are signs of that which the Holy Ghost inwardly effects : sign and 
 operation coincide, although in an incomprehensible manner (Conf. 
 Belg. art. 35) ; indeed, according to Helv. ii., the symbola et res 
 significatae are sacramentaliter united by God. The Decl. Thorun. ii. 
 6 speaks of their gratiam exhibere mediantibus illis signis, and of a 
 vera et infallibilis rerum promissarum modo ipsis convenient! et pro- 
 prio exhibitio. The Conf. Gall. art. 37, however, says : deum nobis 
 reipsa i. e. vere et efficaciter donare, quidquid sacramentaliter figurat 
 ac proinde cum signis conjungimus veram possessionem ac fruitionem 
 ejus rei, quae ibi nobis offertur. Add to this what the Conf. Helv. ii.
 
 SACRAMENTS GENERALLY. 237 
 
 says : sacramenta verbo, signis et rebus significatis constantia manent 
 vera et Integra sacramenta, non tantum significantia res sacras sed 
 deo offerente etiam res significatas, tametsi increduli res oblatas noa 
 percipiant. 
 
 1. Although the sacraments are to the Roman as to the Evangelical 
 means of grace, there is much difference in their respective views of 
 the special grace which they are the means of imparting. The Evan- 
 gelical Church teaches that the grace of the forgiveness of sins is 
 presented through the sacraments ; also that their effect is that of 
 quickening and strengthening faith (Apol. C. A. p. 200 ; Helv. ii. c. 
 19). The Roman Catholic Church, on the other hand, regards sacra- 
 ments generally as channels through which sanctifying and saving 
 grace in its rich and manifold diversity flows: we have only to 
 think of the altar, penance, marriage, orders ! The Council of Trent 
 says, sess. vii. can. 5, de sacr. : Si quis dixerit, sacramenta propter 
 solam fidem nutriendam instituta fuisse, anathema sit. For the posi- 
 tive side, see Cat Rom. ii. 1. 11 and 14; Bellarmine, de sacr. ii. 2; 
 Becani Manuale controv. i. 173. Thus it appears how much the 
 Roman Church has misinterpreted the Protestant faith, in making it 
 teach only that the sacraments were intended for the strengthening 
 of faith. 
 
 2. The symbols do not dwell at length on the relation between the 
 operation of grace in the sacraments and the sacramental elements 
 themselves. But in the Reformed Confessions, the Holy Ghost, who 
 makes that real in the heart which the elements figure, is not indis- 
 tinctly described as an independent power, which however is strictly 
 connected through the sacramental institution with the external rite ; 
 and that which is laid down in Calv. Instil, iv. 14 is stated in them 
 without controversy. Luther gives a closer internal connection 
 between water in baptism and the word of God in Cat. maj. 538, 539 : 
 By the word the baptismal water first becomes a sacrament and means 
 of grace. And this doctrine, as the opposite of a virtus Sp. . extrin- 
 secus accedens, as the Reformed view is characterized, is accepted 
 heartily by Chemnitz, Gerhard, and others. 
 
 IV. SOCINIAN. 
 
 For the Socinian doctrines, see on Baptism and the Supper. 
 We remark here only : 1. According to the fundamental prin- 
 ciples of Socinus on "baptism, as laid down in his treatise de 
 laptismo aqiice, the Cat. Racov. introduced in the first edition 
 only one prseceptum Christi caerimoniale, that is, the Supper, 
 and baptism was treated only as an appendage, and in a
 
 238 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 negative way. But when the Socinians afterwards sought to 
 conform more to the leading Confessions in respect to baptism, 
 it was discussed as a second ceremonial commandment ; hence 
 in the second edition (1644) we read: Actus extend religiosi 
 sui ritus sacri in eccl. Ch. semper ususrpati sunt baptismus et 
 fractio panis. And baptism takes the precedence. So also, in 
 the Confess, p. 24, Baptism and the Supper are reckoned 
 together among the res sanctae, quarum communionem habere 
 quisque debet. 2. Socinus declares against the expression 
 sacrament as unbiblical. 3. The Summa theol. Unit, iii 8 
 enlarges the sacramental idea in the Arminian way, defin- 
 ing sacraments thus : Mutuae inter deum ac homines sacrse 
 confoederationis tesserae; non enim sunt tantum testimonia 
 obedientiae christ., sed etiam gratiae div. in nos collates et 
 conferendae signa. 
 
 V. AEMINIAN. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. xxiii. 1 : Sacramenta cum dicimus, ex- 
 ternas ecclesiae caeremonias seu ritus illos sacros ac solennes 
 intelligimus, quibus veluti fcederalibus signis ac sigillis visibi- 
 lius deus gratiosa beneficia sua in foedere praesertim evangelico 
 promissa non modo nobis repreesentat et adumbrat, sed et certo 
 modo exhibet atque obsignat, nosque vicissim palam publice- 
 que declaramus ac testamur, nos promissiones omnes divinas 
 ver&, firma atque obsequiosa fide amplecti et beneficia ipsius 
 jugi, et grata semper memoria celebrare velle. Cf. ApoL Con- 
 fess, p. 245, b. 
 
 limborch, Theol. chr. v. 66. 31 : Eestat, ut dicamus, deum 
 gratiam suam per sacramenta nobis exhibere, non earn actu 
 per ilia conferendo sed per ilia tanquam signa clara et evi- 
 dentia earn reprsesentando et ob oculos ponendo . . . tanquam 
 praesentem, ut ita in signis istis tanquam in speculo quodam 
 exhibitionem illam gratiae, quam deus nobis concessit, quasi 
 eonspiciamus. Estque haec efficacia nulla alia, quam objectiva, 
 quae requirit facultatem cognitivam rite dispositam, ut appre- 
 hendere possit illud, quod signum objective menti offert. 
 Operantur in nobis tanquam signa repraesentantia menti nostrae 
 rem, cujus signa sunt. Neque alia in illis quseri debet em-
 
 SACEAMENTS GENERALLY. 239 
 
 cacia. Sic sacramentum confirmat fidem, quia magis persuadet, 
 veram esse promissionem, cui confirmandae comparatum est, 
 quia sigilli instar eat, quo deus promissum suum verbo testa- 
 turn visibili quodam signo confirmat nosque certos reddit, se 
 nos fcedere suo comprehendisse, seque a sua parte promissis 
 staturum, si nos officio nostro non desimus. Nam licet in. 
 sacramento res, quse promittitur, futura spectetur, promissum 
 tamen est prsesens, et res futura ita spectatur, ut sacramentum 
 ferme earn repraesentet. (In 29 L. had refuted the dogma 
 of a spirituals perceptio rerum ipsarum.) 
 
 Eis, Conf. art. 3 : Sacramenta sunt externse visibilesque 
 actiones et signa immensae benignitatis dei erga nos, nobis 
 ex parte dei ob oculos ponentia internam spiritualemque 
 actionem, quam deus per Christum exsequitur regenerando, 
 justificando, spiritualiter nutriendo. Nos vero quod attinet, 
 iisdem confitemur religionem, pcenitentiam, fidem et obedien- 
 tiam nostram. 
 
 The Feet-washing. 
 
 The Mennonites placed by the side of the sacraments, 
 as a holy usage prescribed by Christ, the washing of the 
 feet. Vide Conf. der Friesen u. Deutscli. art. 13 and 
 Cornelis, BeJcenntn. art. 11. In the former passage the feet- 
 washing is .only in a distant manner indicated, as in refer- 
 ence to the communion of believers. But it is well known 
 that the Frisian or rigid Mennonites practised this mutual 
 feet-washing. 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 The Eoman Church, like the Greek, reckons seven sacra- 
 ments : that is, baptism, confirmation, eucharist, penance, ex- 
 treme unction, orders, marriage. The Protestant Church, 
 including all parties, admit only two : baptism and the holy 
 supper. But the Eoman Church does not attribute an equal 
 dignity to all the seven.
 
 240 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL REFERENCES. 
 
 I. ROMAN AND GREEK. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 7. sacram. can. 1 : Si quis dixerit, sacra- 
 menta novse legis . . . esse plura vel pauciora quam septem 
 (videlicet baptismum, confirmationem, eucharistiam, pceniten- 
 tiam, extreman unctionem, ordinem et matrimonium), aut etiam 
 aliquod homm septem non esse vere et proprie sacramentum : 
 anathema sit. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 1. 20 : CUT neque plura neque pauciora (sacra- 
 menta) numerentur, ex iis etiam rebus, quae per similitudi- 
 nem a naturali vitS, ad spiritualem transferuntur, probabili 
 quadam ratione ostendi poterit. Homini enim ad vivendum 
 vitamque conservandam et ex sua reique publicse utilitate tra- 
 ducendam haec septem necessaria videntur, ut scilicet in lucem 
 edatur, augeatur, alatur, si in morbum incidat, sanetur, imbe- 
 cillitas virium reficiatur ; deinde, quod ad rempublicam attinet, 
 ut magistratus nunquam desint, quorum auctoritate et imperio 
 regatur, ac postremo legitima sobolis propagatione seipsum et 
 humanum genus conservet. Quse omnia quoniam vitee illi, 
 qua animo deo vivit, respondere satis apparet, ex iis facile 
 sacramentorum numerus colligetur. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 154: 'E-jrra fjLvcrrrjpia T>}<? e/c/cX^o-ia?* ra 
 oTTota elvai ravra' TO /SaTrrtoyia, TO pvpov rov xpia paro?, TJ 
 evxapta-Tia, rj nerdvoia, f) iepoMrvvi}, 6 Tifuo? yapo? teal TO e^%e- 
 Xatov TaOra ra eirra fj-var^pia avaftiftdtyvTat, et9 ra CTTTO, 
 ^apifffiara rov dyiov Trvevfjuirof. 
 
 Cf. Jerem. in Actis Wirtemb. p, 77 ; Dosithei Confess, c. xv.; 
 Plato, Catech. p. 122. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 7, can. 3 : Si quis dixerit, haec septem 
 sacramenta ita esse inter se paria, ut nulla ratione aliud sit 
 alio dignius, anath. sit. (Bellarmin, De sacram. in genere, ii 
 28 : Concilium prsecipue intendit damnare errorem Luthera- 
 norum de paritate baptismi et eucharistiae.) 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii 1. 22 : Sacramenta non parem omnia et eequa- 
 lem necessitatem aut dignitatem habent, atque ex iis tria sunt, 
 quas, tametsi non eadem ratione, tamen prse ceteris necessaria 
 dicuntur, baptismus, pcenitentia, ordo; verum si dignitas in
 
 SACRAMENTS GENERALLY. 241 
 
 sacramentis spectetur, eucharistia sanctitate et mysteriorum 
 numero ac magnitudine longe ceteris antecellit (s. Cone. Trid. 
 sess. xiii. cap. 3). 
 
 Baptism and the Eucharist are esteemed by the Greeks the 
 chief sacraments: Plato, Catech. p. 122; Jerem. in Actis 
 Wirtemb. p. 240. Metroph. Critopulus, c. 5, p. 72 sq., adds 
 penance, and calls the three ra 7rpo<? (rwrypiav dvayicaia /jiva-- 
 rripia. Cf. Heinecc. ii. 239 f., against Cyrill Lucar., who, in 
 Conf. c. 15, says that only two sacraments were ordained by 
 Christ. Cyrill. Berrhceens. Censura synod, p. 77, and Par- 
 then., p. 127, utter an anathema. In both decrees there is 
 no difference in the dignity of the seven sacraments. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 The Catechisms of Luther and the Conf. Aug. treated only 
 of two sacraments, baptism and the Supper, without excluding 
 the others expressly from the number of the sacraments. 1 On 
 penance, the Catech. major. 594: Vides, baptismum aeque et 
 virtute et significatione sua tertium quoque sacramentum com- 
 prehendere, quod poenitentiam appellare consueverunt, quse 
 proprie nihil aliud est, quam baptismus aut ejus exercitium. 
 (Melanchthon's (Apol. p. 167) explanation : Absolutio proprie 
 dici potest sacramentum pcenitentice, cf. p. 159, is by this 
 modified. Against the seven we have the following testi- 
 monies : 
 
 Apol. C. A. p. 200 : (Adversarii) jubent nos etiam septem 
 sacramenta numerare. Nos sentimus praestandum esse, ne 
 negligantur res et cerimoniae in scripturis institutse, quotcun- 
 que sunt. Nee multum referre putamus, etiamsi docendi 
 causa alii numerant aliter, si tamen recte conservent res in 
 scriptural traditas. Nee veteres eodem modo numeraverunt. 
 
 Conf. ffelv. ii. c. 19 : Novi populi sacramenta sunt baptis- 
 mus et ccena dominica. Sunt qui sacramenta novi populi 
 septem numerent. Ex quibus nos pcenitentiam, ordinationem 
 ministroram, non papisticam quidem illam sed apostolicam, 
 et matrimonium agnoscimus instituta esse del utilia, sed non 
 
 1 Only the Conf. Wirtemb. expressly argues against the five Eoman sacra- 
 ments. On the Reformed side, this is done in the Declar. TJiorun. ii. 6. 
 
 Q
 
 242 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 sacramenta. Confinnatio et extrema unctio inventa sunt homi- 
 num, quibus nullo cum damno carere potest ecclesia. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 35 : Agnoscimus duo tantum sacramenta, 
 toti ecclesise communia cet. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 33 : Sufficit nobis is sacramentorum nume- 
 rus, quern Christus magister noster instituit: quse duo dun- 
 taxat sunt, nimirum sacramentum baptism! et sacrae ccenae 
 Jesu Christi. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt, art. 25 : Sacraments ordained of Christ 
 be not only badges or tokens of Christian men's profession, 
 but rather they.be certain sure witnesses and effectual signs 
 of grace, and God's goodwill towards us, by the which He doth 
 work invisibly in us, and doth not only quicken, but also 
 strengthen and confirm our faith in Him. There are two 
 sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the gospel : that is 
 to say, baptism and the Supper of the Lord. Those five, com- 
 monly called sacraments, that is to say, confirmation, penance, 
 orders, matrimony, and extreme unction, are not to be counted 
 for sacraments of the gospel, being such as have grown partly 
 of the corrupt following of the apostles, partly are states of 
 life allowed in the Scriptures ; but yet have not like nature 
 of sacraments with baptism and the Lord's Supper, for that 
 they have not any visible sign or ceremony ordained of God. 
 The sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed upon, 
 or to be carried about ; but that we should duly use them. 
 And in such only as worthily receive the same they have 
 a wholesome effect or operation : but they that receive them 
 unworthily, purchase to themselves damnation, as Saint Paul 
 saith. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxvii. sec. 4 : There be only two sacraments 
 ordained by Christ our Lord in the gospel, that is to say, bap- 
 tism and the Supper of the Lord ; neither of which may be dis- 
 pensed by any but by a minister of the word, lawfully ordained. 
 
 III. AEMINIAN. 
 
 The Armim'ans (Conf. xxiii 2) acknowledge only two sacra- 
 ments, although they approve of other holy observances, e.g. 
 imposition of hands in ordination and confirmation, the bless-
 
 SACRAMENTS GENERALLY. 243 
 
 ing in marriage, etc., modo absit vana, superstitio seu opinio 
 divini cultus, item prcecisce necessitatis cet. Limborch, TJi. ctir. 
 v. 77, opposes at large the five additional Eoman sacraments. 
 As it regards the Mennonites, Eis admits only two sacra- 
 ments (Conf. art. 30); but the Conf. of the united Frisians 
 and Germans (art. 13) adds to the sacraments the feet- wash- 
 ing (John xiii.) as a ritus prceceptus. Of. Schyn, Plen. deduc. 
 p. 183. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 Of the seven sacraments of the Eoman Church, three baptism, 
 confirmation, and orders have an indelible character (character indele- 
 lilis), and may on no account be repeated : Cone. Trid. sess. vii. sacr. 
 can. 9 ; Cat. Rom. ii. 1. 30 ; Bellarmini Sacr. ii. 19-22. The Pro- 
 testants also reject the repetition of baptism, without, however, 
 attributing to the sacrament an indelible character. Chemn. Exam. 
 
 a T. ii. i. 
 
 THIED POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 The question as to what the operation of the sacraments, as 
 distinguished from their power, depends upon, the two lead- 
 ing communions answer differently. 1. The Eomanists teach 
 that all sacraments exert their influence ex opere opcrato, 
 through the objective sacred performance of them, yet only 
 when the priests perform them with intention : and in this 
 last the Greeks agree with them. 2. The Protestants, on the 
 other hand, assert that the effect of the sacraments, the power 
 indwelling in them, has its operation in the receivers by means 
 of their faith, nothing being dependent on the intention of the 
 administering pastor. But both churches agree (in opposition 
 to the Donatists, A. G. art. 10 ; and Anabaptists, F. G. 829) * 
 that the spiritual character of the administrant is without any 
 influence in this matter, and an unconverted priest may as 
 effectually minister the sacrament as a converted one. 
 
 1 Cf. Luther's deutscJie Werke, xix. 685. In general, the Quakers also are of 
 the opinion that man cannot without the true grace of God be a minister of the 
 gospel and profit souls. Barcl. Apol. Prop. iv.
 
 244 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. ROMAN. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vii. sacram. can. 8 : Si quis dixerit, per ipsa 
 novae legis sacramenta ex opere operato non conferri gratiam, 
 sed solam fidem divinae promissionis ad gratiam consequendam 
 sufficere, anathema sit. 
 
 (Bellarmin, JDe sacram. ii. 1 : Id quod active et proximo 
 atque instrumentaliter efficit gratiam justificationis est sola 
 actio ilia externa, quae sacramentum dicitur, et haec vocatur 
 opus operatum, accipiendo passive (operatum), ita ut idem sit 
 sacramentum conferre gratiam ex opere operato, qucd conferre 
 gratiam ex vi ipsius actionis sacramentalis a deo ad hoc insti- 
 tutae, non ex merito agentis vel suscipientis. . . . Voluntas 
 dei, quae sacramento utitur, concurrit quidem active, sed est 
 causa principalis. Passio Christi concurrit, sed est causa 
 meritoria, non autem effectiva, cum non sit actu, sed praeteri- 
 erit, licet maneat objective in mente dei. Potestas et volun- 
 tas ministri concurrunt necessario, sed sunt causae remotae, 
 requiruntur enim ad efficiendam ipsam actionem sacramen- 
 talem, quae postea immediate operatur. Probitas ministri re- 
 quiritur, ut ipse minister non peccet sacramenta ministrando, 
 non tamen ipsa est causa gratiae in suscipiente nee juvat 
 suscipientem per modum sacramenti, sed solum per modum 
 impetrationis et exempli. Voluntas, fides et pcenitentia in 
 suscipiente adulto necessario requiruntur ut dispositiones ex 
 parte subjecti, non ut causae activae, non enim fides et preni- 
 tentia efficiunt gratiam sacramentalem neque dant efficaciam 
 sacramenti, sed solum tollunt obstacula, quae impedirent, ne 
 sacramenta suam efficaciam exercere possent, unde in pueris, 
 ubi non requiritur dispositio, sine his rebus fit justificatio. 
 Exemplum esse potest in re naturali. Si ad ligna combu- 
 renda primum exsiccarentur ligna, deinde excuteretur ignis ex 
 silice, turn applicaretur ignis ligno et sic tandem fieret com- 
 bustio : nemo diceret, causam immediatam combustionis esse 
 siccitatem aut excussionem ignis ex silice aut applicationem 
 ignis ad ligna, sed solum ignem ut causam primariam et solum 
 calorem s. calefactionem ut causam instrumentalem. Cf.
 
 SACRAMENTS GENERALLY. 245 
 
 Bossii Institt. theol. ii. 2*79, and what is said, Cone. Trid. 
 sess. vi. cap. 6, as to the disposition in the adult towards- bap- 
 tism. According to this, the controversy in its main point 
 would disappear ; for, that their power indwells in the sacra- 
 ments in virtue of the Lord's institution, Protestantism has 
 never even distantly denied. 1 Meanwhile, 1. It has been 
 shown that the Melanchthonian explanation of the ex opere 
 operate had not been unusual before the Eeformation in the 
 schools of theology. 2. It appears that what is demanded of 
 the recipient is rather something negative than positive, the non 
 ponere obicem : cf. Cone. Trid. sess. vii. sacr. can. 6 (in peccato 
 mortali non esse constitutum ?). 3. Even admitted that this 
 non ponere obicem must be interpreted of positive qualities, the 
 faith demanded by the Roman teachers is not identical with 
 the faith of Protestants. Vide Baur, Gegensatz, S. 299.) 
 
 The Greek Confessions contain nothing of an influence of 
 the sacraments ex opere, operate. Compare, on the contrary, 
 the requirement of a firm faith in the communicant, Plato, 
 Catech. p. 129. 
 
 Cat. Bom. ii. 1. 25 : Ministri, quoniam in sacra ilia func- 
 tione non suam, sed Christi personam gerunt, ea re fit, ut, sive 
 boni sive mali sint, modo ea forma et materia utantur, quam 
 ex Christi instituto semper ecclesia catholica servavit, idque 
 facere proponant, quod ecclesia. in ea administratione facit, vere 
 sacramentum confidant et conferant : ita, ut gratise fructum 
 nulla res impedire possit, nisi, qui ea suscipiunt, se ipsos tanto 
 bono fraudare et Spiritui sancto velint obsistere. Cf. ii. 4. 68. 
 
 Conf. Trid. sess. vii. sacram. can. 1 1 : Si quis dixerit, in 
 ministris, dum sacramenta conficiunt et conferunt, non requiri 
 intentionem saltern faciendi, quod facit ecclesia, anath. sit. 
 
 (Bellarmin. de sacram. i. 27 : Sententia Catholicorum est, 
 requiri intentionem faciendi, quod facit ecclesia. Ita enim 
 expresse habent concilium Tridentinum et concilium Floren- 
 tinum in instructione Armenorum. Sunt autem hoc loco 
 queedam notanda. Primo non ita requiri, ut minister habeat 
 
 1 Vide esp. Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 19 : Sicnt a dignitate vel indignitate ministro- 
 rum non sestimamus integritatem sacramentorum, ita neque a conditione sumcn- 
 tium. Agnoscimus enim, sacramentorum integritatem ex fide vel veritate 
 meraque bonitate dei dependere.
 
 246 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 intentionem generalem faciendi, quod facit ecclesia, ut non 
 possit habere particularem : immo melius est habere particu- 
 larem, id est, conferendi sacramentum baptismi, absolutionis 
 cet Sed qui non nosset nostra mysteria, satis esset, si in 
 generali intenderet facere, quod facit ecclesia : et hoc decent 
 evangelia. Secundo non est opus, intendere, quod facit 
 ecclesia Romana, sed quod facit vera ecclesia, quaecunque 
 ilia sit, vel quod Christus instituit, vel quod faciunt 
 Christiani: ista enim in idem recidunt. . . . Qui intendit 
 facere, quod facit ecclesia Genevensis, intendit facere, quod 
 fait ecclesia universalis, . . . quia putat illam esse mem- 
 brum ecclesiae versa universalis. . . . Non tollit efficaciam 
 sacramenti error ministri circa ecclesiam, sed defectus in- 
 tentionis. Atque nine est, quod in ecclesia catholica non 
 rebaptizantur baptizati a Genevensibus. . . . Tertio non re- 
 quiritur necessario actualis intentio, nee sufficit habitualis, 
 (qualis etiam in dormiente inesse potest; . . . alioqui bap- 
 tizatus diceretur, si quis a dormiente vel ebrio baptizatus 
 esset) sed virtualis requiritur et sufficit, quamvis danda sit 
 opera, ut actualis habeatur. . . . Virtualis dicitur, cum actualis 
 intentio in prsesenti non adest ob aliquam evagationem mentis, 
 tamen paulo ante adfuit et in virtute illius fit operatio. Cf. 
 Bossii Institutt. theol. ii p. 334 sqq.) 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 156 : 6 iepevs dyid^ei TO pwrypiov rfj 
 Bvvd/j.L TOV ayiov TTV.J pe yvtafiijv d'rrcMpao'ia'iJievrjv TOV va TO 
 afytcurrj. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vii. sacram. can. 1 2 : Si quis dixerit, mini- 
 strum in peccato mortali exsistentem, modo omnia essentialia, 
 quae ad sacramentum conficiendum aut conferendum pertinent, 
 servaverit, non conficere aut conferre sacramentum : anathema 
 sit. Cf. Klee, kathol. Dogmat. ii 87 ff. 
 
 IL PROTESTANT. 
 
 C. A. p. 13 : Damnant igitur illos, qui decent, quod sacra- 
 menta ex opere operate justificent, nee decent, fidem requiri in 
 usu sacramentorum, qu33 credat remitti peccata. 
 
 Apol. C. A. p. 203 : Damnamus totum populum Scholasti- 
 comm doctorum, qui docent, quod sacramenta non ponenti
 
 SACKAMENTS GENEKALLY. 247 
 
 obicem conferant gratiam ex opere operate, sine bono motu 
 utentis. Hsec simpliciter judaica opinio est, sentire, quod 
 per cerimoniam justificemur, sine bono motu cordis, hoc 
 est sine fide. ... At sacramenta sunt signa promissionum. 
 Igitur in usu debet accedere fides. Loquimur Me de fide 
 speciali, quae praesenti promissioni credit, non tantum, quas 
 in genere credit deum esse, sed quae credit offerri remissionem 
 peccatorum. 
 
 (Conf. Bohem, art. 11 : Decent, quod sacramenta per se vel 
 ex opere operate his, qui prius bono motu non sunt praediti et 
 intus per Spiritum sanctum vivificati, non conferunt gratiam 
 nee fidem illam justificantem largiuntur. Praecedere enim 
 fidem oportuit (de adultis loquimur), qu33 hominem per Sp. s. 
 vivificet et' cordi bonos motus injiciat ; sine fide enim . . . 
 nee ulli sacramenta prosunt.) 
 
 Helv. ii. cap. 19 : Non approbamus istorum doctrinam, qui 
 decent, gratiam et res significatas signis (sacram.) ita alligari 
 et includi, ut quicunque signis exterius participent, etiam 
 interius gratiae rerumque significatarum participes sint, quales 
 sint. The positive side is laid down in many places : Habent 
 Symbola (in sacram.) promissiones adjunctas, quae requirunt 
 fidem. . . . Sacramenta . . . manent vera et Integra, . . . tametsi 
 increduli res oblatas non percipiant. Fit hoc non dantis aut 
 offerentis dei vitio, sed hominum sine fide illegitimeque acci- 
 pientium culpa". 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 37 : Affirmamus, eos, qui ad sacram mensam 
 domini puram fidem tanquam vas quoddam afferunt, vere reci- 
 pere, quod sibi signa testificantur. 
 
 Conf. Scot. art. 21 : Totum hoc ex vera" fide Jesum Ch. ap- 
 prehendente, qui solus facit sacramenta nobis efficacia, pro- 
 venire dicimus. 
 
 Dcclar. Thorun. ii. 6. 4 : Non operantur sacr. aut conferunt 
 gratiam ex opere operate sine bono motu utentis, sed virtute 
 promissionis, quae vera fide acceptanda est. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxvii. sec. 3 : The grace which is exhibited 
 in or by the sacraments/rightly used, is not conferred by any 
 power in them ; neither doth the efficacy of a sacrament 
 depend upon the piety or intention of him that doth administer 
 it, but upon the work of the Spirit, and the word of institution ;
 
 248 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 which contains, together with a precept authorizing the use 
 thereof, a promise of benefit to worthy receivers. 
 
 Helv. ii. cap. 1 9 : Minime probamus eos, qui sanctificationem 
 sacramentorum attribuunt nescio quibus characteribus et reci- 
 tation! vel virtuti verborum pronuntiatorum a consecratore et 
 qui habeat intentionem consecrandi. 
 
 Declar. Thorun. ii 6. 5 : Efficacia sacramenti non pendet ab 
 intentione ministri, modo in ipsa actione s. administratione 
 servetur formoe divinse institutions. 
 
 A. C. p. 1 2 : Sacramenta propter ordinationem et mandatum 
 Ch. sunt efficacia, etiamsi per malos exhibeantur. 
 
 Apol, A. C. p. 144 : Non sacramenta ideo non sunt efficacia, 
 quia per malos tractantur, imo recte uti possumus sacramentis, 
 quae per malos administrantur. 
 
 Cf. F. C. p. 732. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 19 : (Ut) fideles agnoscant, operari deum 
 in suo institute, ideoque sacramenta perinde ac ex ipsius dei 
 manu percipere et ipsis ministri vitium, si quod insigne ipsi 
 insit, non obesse, quando agnoscant, sacramentorum integri- 
 tatem dependere ab institutione domini. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. xxvi. : Nevertheless, it appertaineth 
 to the discipline of the church that inquiry be made of evil 
 ministers, and that they be accused by those that have know- 
 ledge of their offences ; and finally, being found guilty, by just 
 judgment be deposed. 
 
 The Lutheran Confessions contain no counter-statement as 
 to Intention. But Protestantism, laying all the stress on the 
 subjectivity of the recipient, does not apologize for or regard 
 with indifference the evil character of the administrant who 
 thoughtlessly dispenses the sacrament. As, according to our 
 fundamental principles, the sacraments have not their effect 
 ex opere operantis (administrantis), we may say in this sense 
 that they effect their purpose ex opere opcrato, as even Bellar- 
 mine, de bon. oper. ii. 1 2, uses the phrase. But, on account of 
 its ambiguity, Protestants have always avoided the term.
 
 XV. 
 
 BAPTISM, 
 
 FIRST POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 ALL Christian communities, the Quakers excepted, hold bap- 
 tism with water as applied by Christ to be a religious ordinance 
 of perpetual obligation in the church. But they differ in 
 many points, and with regard to this one. The Socinians 
 believe that it was not ordained by Christ to be continual, 
 and that, according to the usage of the apostles, it is to be 
 administered only to those who pass over from outside Christi- 
 anity to the Christian faith. The Romanists and Greeks and 
 Protestants regard this sacrament as instituted by the Lord for 
 perpetual observance, and to be administered to those born 
 in Christendom as well as to those who enter it. 
 
 SOCINIAN SYMBOLS. 
 
 Cat. Eac. qu. 345 : Quid sentis de aquse baptismo ? Id, 
 quod sit ritus initiationis, quo homines, agnita Christi doctrina 
 et suscepta in eum fide, Christo auctorantur et discipulis ejus 
 seu ecclesioe inseruntur, renuntiantes mundo et moribus errori- 
 busque ejus, profitentes vero, se patrem et filium et Spiritum 
 sanctum, qui per apostolos locutus est, pro unico duce et 
 magistro religionis totiusque vitae et conversationis suse habi- 
 turos esse, ipsaque sui ablutione et immersione ac remersione 
 declarantes ac veluti reprsesentantes, se peccatorum sordes 
 
 249
 
 250 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 deponere, Christo consepeliri, proinde commori et ad vitse 
 novitatem resurgere velle, utque id reipsa praestent sese ob- 
 stringentes, simul etiam hoc professione et obligatione factS, 
 symbolum et signum remissionis peccatorum ipsamque adeo 
 remissionem accipientes (literally the same in the last re- 
 vision). 
 
 Socin. De, bapt. aq. c. 16, p. 734, b: Abunde probation, non 
 fuisse omnibus, qui Christi discipuli esse velint peraeque et in 
 perpetuum aquae baptismum suscipiendi praeceptum datum, et 
 ob earn rem posse quempiam et nominari et revera esse Chris- 
 tianum, licet aquae baptismum vel mrnquam vel non rite, cum 
 tamen posset, acceperit. C. 17, p. 736, a: Quoniam passim 
 receptum est, ut qui ecclesiae annumerari debeant, aquae bap- 
 tismo sint tincti : tingantur porro aquae baptismo omnes, qui 
 pro jam tinctis non habentur ; nihil enim prohibet, quo minus 
 id fieri possit, quamvis ut fiat, praeceptum non fuerit. P. 
 736, b: Dico censere me, ut quicunque ex Judseis vel Turcis 
 vel aliis, qui J. Ch. religionem minime profitentur, ad ipsum 
 Chr. convertuntur, in ipsius J. Ch. nomen omnino aqua bap- 
 tizentur ipsique e& ratione initientur. Etsi enim ea de re 
 nullum expressum et perpetuum mandatum exstat, apostolos 
 tamen qui id facere consueverunt, imitari decet. P. 737, a : 
 Porro qui infantes ex fratribus nati baptizati non fuerint, 
 ii, quoniam ut dicimus, adhuc baptismum aquae a nemine 
 negligi debere, plerique omnes censent, omnino postquam ita 
 adoleverint, ut suae fidei rationem reddere possint, in J. C. 
 nomen aqua tingantur. Opp. i. p. 351, a. 
 
 Socinus, De aq. lapt., seeks to show that Christ did not 
 Himself (not even in Matt, xxviii. 1 9) institute baptism as a 
 rite of initiation ; and that the apostles, without any command 
 of Christ, applied it only to adult Jews and Gentiles, and not 
 always to them. 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 The Socinians regard baptism only as a ceremony by means 
 of which the baptized publicly testifies his entrance into the
 
 BAPTISM. 251 
 
 Christian church, and his assumption of all its obligations. 1 
 The Arminians and Mennonites discern in it further a figura- 
 tive assurance of the divine grace. The Komanists, Greeks, 
 and other Protestants, on the other hand, without denying to 
 the sacrament the significance of a rite of reception and pro- 
 fession, attribute to it a divine energy for regeneration, and 
 therefore hold it to be a means of grace. But with this 
 difference : the Eomanists and Greeks maintain that in baptism 
 original sin is destroyed ; while the Protestants, in accordance 
 with their stricter view of original sin, teach that original sin 
 still remains even in the baptized, though not as condemnable 
 in the sight of God, or not regarded by Him as such, and not 
 imputed. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 The Signification and Virtue of Baptism generally. 
 
 I. SOCINIAN SYMBOLS. 
 
 Cat. Rac. qu. 348 (last revision) : Falluntur vehementer, 
 (qui putant, homines ritu baptismi regenerari). Etem'm re- 
 generatio est rationis et voluntatis nostrae transmutatio et ad 
 Christi doctrinam compositio, ut ipsa vox regeneratio indicat. 
 Verum ejusmodi transformatio in infantibus locum habere 
 nequit. Qui ignorant, quse dextra et sinistra sit, tantum 
 abest, ut res tanti momenti in eos cadat. Adultos vero, in 
 quibus mentis et voluntatis transformatio locum habet, aqua vel 
 ritu regenerari posse, tantum a veritate abest, ut etiam videatur 
 quidpiam hoc idololatriaa simile, cum aquae vel ritui hoc vel 
 adscribitur vel sine express^ dei voluntate adstringitur, quod 
 ipsi deo et sacro ejus verbo, eorum qui regenerandi sunt 
 mentibus percepto, adscribi debet. 
 
 Compare, however, the following words of Socinus, Disput. 
 
 1 Zwingli's somewhat similar view is expressed in the Conf. ad Carolum V. 
 briefly thus : The matter in baptism is the union with the church and people of 
 God. Baptism is a sacrament signifying, to wit, that the recipient belongs 
 to the church : not that it makes him belong to it, but that it testifies to the 
 people that he already belongs to it.
 
 252 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 dc lapt. aquce, c. 7 (in Opp. i 724) : Considerandum est, me 
 non negare, quin in bapt. aquae post. Ch. resurrectionem instituto 
 aliquid sit, quod ad peccatorum remissionem s. ad peccata 
 delenda aliquo modo pertineat. Est enim in ipso, cum in J. 
 Ch. nomine ministretur, publica et aperta J. C. nominis pro- 
 fessio, quae nullo pacto omitti debet, alioquin a peccatorum 
 reatu liberatio non continget. Verum professio ista externse 
 illi ablutioni alligata non est, adeo ut etiam alio modo fieri non 
 queat cet. P. 744, b : Quod attinet ad peccatorum remis- 
 sionem, earn per aquse bapt. adumbratam quidem fuisse et 
 dari quodam modo consuevisse, hoc ipso loco (Heb. vi. 1, 2) 
 fatetur scriptura. Verum hoc posterius non alia ratione in- 
 telligendum est, quam id, quod de donatione Sp. s. per mammm 
 impostionem commemorat, ut scil. res, quae dabatur, nullo modo 
 ipsi ritui externo alligata esset, nee ab ipsius vi aliqua pro- 
 ficisceretur, quamvis, ea cerimonia rite peracta, ex div. benigni- 
 tate omnino dari consuevisset. 
 
 II. ARMINIAN AND MENNONITE. 
 
 Con/. Eemonstr. xxiii. 3 : Baptismus est primus Nevi Test, 
 publicus et sacer ritus, in quo fcederati omnes (nullo aut aetatis, 
 aut sexus discrimine) per solennem aquas ablutionem ecclesiae 
 inseruntur et cultui divino initiantur, sive idcirco in nomen 
 patris et filii et Spiritus sancti aquae immerguntur vel aqua 
 abluntur, ut hoc veluti symbolico signo ac sacra tessera con- 
 firmentur de gratiosa dei erga ipsos voluntate, quod sicut aqua 
 sordes corporis abluuntur, ita ipsi per sanguinem et spiritum 
 Christi (modo sua ipsorum culpa gratiosum hoc foedus irritum 
 non fecerint) intus purgandi, sive a reatu omnium peccatorum 
 plenissime liberandi, et tandem gloriosa filiorum dei immor- 
 talitate atque seterna felicitate donandi sint ; ac simul etiam 
 ex altera parte ipsi obligentur, eoque palam declarent, se 
 omnem salutem suam a solo deo et domino Jesu Christo, unico 
 mediatore, sacerdote ac rege suo constanter exspectare, ipsi ex 
 animo confidere, eique, abjectis peccatorum omnium sordibus 
 atque inquinamentis, virtute Spiritus sancti per omnem vitam 
 obedire velle. Cf. Limborch, TJieol. christ. v. 67. 5. 
 
 Ris, Confess, art. 31, 32: Sacer baptismus est externa,
 
 BAPTISM. 253 
 
 visibilis et evangelica actio, in qua sec. Cliristi praeceptum et 
 praxin apostolorum ad finem sanctum aqua baptizantur, . . . 
 qui doctrinam evangelii audiunt, credunt et libenter poenitenti 
 corde accipiunt. Tota extern! baptism! actio nobis ante 
 oculos ponit, testatur et significat, J. Chr. poenitentem et cre- 
 dentem hominem interne baptizare in lavacro regenerationis 
 et renovatione Sp. sancti, abluens per virtutem et merita 
 sanguinis sui effusi omnes animie maculas atque peccata et per 
 virtutem et operationem Sp. s., qui vera . . . aqua est, internam 
 animse malitiam redditque earn ccelestem, spiritualem cet. 
 Cf. a. Cornelis, Bckenntn. art. vii. 
 
 III. BOMAN, GREEK, PROTESTANT. 
 
 Concil. Trid. sess. xiv. pcen. cap. 2 : Per baptismum Christum 
 induentes nova prorsus in illo efficimur creatura, plenam et 
 integram peccatorum omnium remissionem consequentes. Cf. 
 sess. vi. cap. 7. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 2. 5 : Becte et apposite definitur, baptismum 
 esse sacramentum regenerationis per aquam in verbo. Natura 
 enim ex Adam filii irse nascimur, per baptismum vero in 
 Christo filii inisericordise renascimur. Cf. ii. 2. 42, 45. 
 (More definitely Bellarmin, Bapt. c. 12 : Confert ex opere op. 
 gratiam et dona divina, quibus vere et formaliter justificatur 
 homo. Cf. Klee, Dogmat. iii. S. 106.) II. ii. 2. 44 : Baptism! 
 proprius effectus est peccatorum omnium, sive originis vitio 
 sive nostra culpa contracta sint, remissio. 45 : In baptismo 
 non solum peccata remittuntur, seel peccatorum etiam et 
 scelerum pcense omnes a deo benigne condonantur. 50. Ex- 
 ponenclum est, hujus sacrament! virtute nos non solum a malis, 
 quse vere mala dicenda sunt, liberari, verum etiam eximiis 
 bonis et muneribus augeri. Animus enim noster divina gratia 
 repletur, qua justi et filii dei effect! seternae quoque salutis 
 heredes instituimur. Est autem gratia non solum, per quam 
 peccatorum fit remissio, sed divina qualitas in anima inhserens 
 . . ., quaB animarum nostrarum maculas omnes delet ipsasque 
 animas pulchriores et splendidiores reddit. 
 
 Conf. orihod. p. 1 5 9 sq. : To {3 aimer pa roa-qv Zvvapw e 
 OTTOV eercovTas Kal va ^ BiBerai Sevrepov, elvcu
 
 254 CONFESSIONS OF CHEISTEXDOM. 
 
 TT? a-WTrjpias T?9 awvov, KOI Troto? va evai 
 Kal TO KepBo<t rov fjbVo-rtjpLOV TOVTOV, VKO\a Ka&* evas TO <yva>- 
 pt%i. Atari 7rprov o~LK(bvei o\a ra apaprtffiara, et? //,/ TO. 
 /3pe<j>r) TO vrpOTraropiKov, ei? Se TOU? peyaXovs Kal TO TrpoTrar. 
 Kal TO TrpoaiperiKov Sevrepov o dv0pa)7ro<; avaKaivi&rai, Kal 
 aTroKaOicrrarai els TTJV SiKaiaxriv eKeivyv, OTTOV el^ev orav 
 JJTOV aO&os KOI dvapdpTijTos. . . . cTreira ol 
 fyi'vovvrat ^\t) TOV eoafuiTos rov Xptcrrov Kal rbv Kvpiov 
 
 Cf. Jerem. in Act. Wirtemb. p. 248. 
 
 Luth. Cat. min. p. 376 : Baptismus operatur remissionem 
 peccatorum, liberat a morte et a diabolo et donat seternam 
 beatitudinem omnibus et singulis, qui credunt hoc, quod 
 verba et promissiones divinae pollicentur. Cat. maj. p. 543 : 
 . . . quaecunqtie baptismo promittuntur et offeruntur, \dcto- 
 ria nempe mortis ac diaboli, remissio peccatomm, gratia del, 
 Christus cum omnibus suis operibus et Sp. sanctus c. omnibus 
 suis dotibus. 
 
 Conf. Helv. il cap. 20 : Nascimur omnes in peccatorum 
 sordibus et sumus filii irae ; deus autem purgat nos a peccatis 
 gratuito per sanguinem filii sui et in hoc adoptat nos in filios 
 . . . et variis donis ditat, ut possimus novam vivere vitam. 
 Obsignantur haec omnia baptismo; nam intus regeneramur, 
 purificamur et renovamur a deo per Spiritum sanctum, foris 
 autem accipimus obsignationem maximorum donorum in aqua, 
 qua etiam maxima ilia beneficia repraesentantur et veluti oculis 
 nostris conspicienda proponuntur. 
 
 TJiirty-nine Artt. art. xxviL : Baptism is not only a sign of 
 profession, and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are 
 decerned from others that be not christened ; but it is also a 
 sign of regeneration or new birth, whereby, as by an instru- 
 ment, they that receive baptism rightly are grafted into the 
 church ; the promises of forgiveness of sin, and of our adop- 
 tion to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly 
 signed and sealed ; faith is confirmed, and grace increased by 
 virtue of prayer unto God. The baptism of young children is 
 in any wise to be retained in the church, as most agreeable 
 with the institution of Christ. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxviii sec. 1 : Baptism is a sacrament of
 
 BAPTISM:. 255 
 
 the New Testament, ordained by Jesus Christ, not only for 
 the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible 
 church, but also to be unto him a sign and seal of the covenant 
 of grace, of his ingrafting into Christ, of regeneration, of remis- 
 sion of sins, and of his giving up unto God through Jesus 
 Christ, to walk in newness of life ; which sacrament is, by 
 Christ's own appointment, to be continued in His church until 
 the end of the world. Sec. 2: The outward element to be 
 used in this sacrament is water, wherewith the party is to be 
 baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of 
 the Holy Ghost, by a minister of the gospel, lawfully called 
 thereunto. Sec. 3: Dipping of the person into the water is 
 not necessary ; but baptism is rightly administered by pouring 
 or sprinkling water upon the person. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 35 : Baptismus nobis testificandse nostne 
 adoptioni datus, quoniam in eo inserimur Christi corpori, ut 
 ejus sanguine abluti simul etiam ipsius spiritu ad vitae sancti- 
 moniam renovemur. 
 
 Catech. Genev. p. 522 : Baptismi significatio duas partes 
 habet. Nam ibi remissio peccatorum, deinde spirituals re- 
 generatio figuratur. . . . Annon aliud aquae tribuis, nisi ut 
 ablutionis tantum sit figura ? Sic figuram esse sentio, ut 
 simul annexa sit veritas. Neque enim sua nobis dona polli- 
 cendo nos deus frustratur. Proinde et peccatorum veniam et 
 vitae novitatem offerri nobis in baptismo et recipi a nobis, 
 certum est. 
 
 Cf. Catech. Heidelb. Fr. 69ff.; Declar. Thonm. p. 61. 
 
 THIED POINT OF DFVEKGENCE. 
 
 From the foregoing it will be assumed that the Eomanists, 
 Greeks, and most Protestants hold baptism necessary, that is, 
 generally necessary to salvation. On that account they teach 
 that even the children of Christians must be baptized. The 
 Anabaptists and Mennonites entirely deny this, however ; 
 while the Arminians and Socinians hold it to be matter of 
 indifference, not necessary, but permissible and decent.
 
 256 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. ROMISH. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. v. 4 : Si quis parvulos recentes ab uteris 
 matrum baptizandos negat, etiamsi fuerint a baptizatis parenti- 
 bus orti, aut dicit, in remissionem quidem peccatorum eos 
 baptizari, sed nihil ex Adam trahere originalis peccati, quod 
 regenerationis lavacro necesse sit expiari ad vitam seternam 
 consequendam, unde fit consequens, ut in iis forma baptismatis 
 in remissionem peccatorum non vera sed falsa intelligatur, 
 anathema sit. 
 
 /&. sess. vii can. 5 : Si quis dixerit, baptismum liberum 
 esse, hoc est non necessarium ad salutem, anathema sit- 
 Can. 1 2 : Si quis dixerit, neminem esse baptizandum, nisi ea 
 cetate qua Christus baptizatus est, vel in ipso mortis articulo, 
 anath. sit. Can. 13 : Si quis dixerit, parvulos eo quod actum 
 credendi non habent, suscepto baptismo inter fideles compu- 
 tandos non esse, ac propterea, cum ad annos discretionis 
 pervenerint, esse rebaptizandos, aut praestare omitti eorum 
 baptisma, quam eos non actu proprio credentes baptizari in 
 sola fide ecclesiae, anath. sit. 
 
 Cat. Bom. ii 2. 31 : Doceantur (fideles), omnibus homini- 
 bus baptismi legem a domino praescriptam esse, ita ut, nisi per 
 baptismi gratiam deo renascantur, in sempiternam miseriam 
 et interitum a parentibus, sive illi fideles sive infideles sint, 
 procreentur. 
 
 II. ii. 2. 33 : Non dubitare licet, quin infantes fidei sacra- 
 menta, cum abluuntur, accipiant : non quia mentis suse assen- 
 sione credant, sed quia parentum fide, si parentes fideles 
 fuerint, sin mi mis, fide, (ut d. Augustini verbis loquamur), 
 universes societatis sanctomm muniuntur. Etenim ab iis 
 omnibus recte dicimus eos baptismo offerri, quibus placet, ut 
 offerantur, et quorum caritate ad communionem sancti Spiritus 
 adjunguntur. 
 
 II PROTESTANT. 
 A. C. p. 12 : De baptismo decent, quod sit necessarius ad
 
 BAPTISM. 257 
 
 salutem, . . . et quod pueri sint baptizandi, qui per baptismum 
 oblati deo recipiantur in gratiam del. 
 
 Apol. A. G. p. 156: Certissimum est, quod promissio salutis 
 pertinet etiam ad parvulos. . . . Igitur necesse est baptizare 
 parvulos, ut applicetur iis promissio salutis, . . . quia salus 
 cum baptismo offertur. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 329 : De psedobaptismo docemus, infantes esse 
 baptizandos. Pertinent enim ad promissam redemtionem per 
 Christum factam, et ecclesia debet illis baptismum et promis- 
 sionis illius annunciationem. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii c. 20 : Damnamus Anabaptistas, qui negant 
 baptizandos esse infantulos recens natos a fidelibus. Nam 
 juxta doctrinam evang. horum est regnum dei et sunt in 
 fcedere dei, cur itaque non daretur iis signum fcederis dei ? 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 35 : Quamvis bapt. sit fidei et resipiscentise 
 sacramentum, tamen cum una cum parentibus posteritatem 
 etiam illorum in ecclesia deus recenseat, affirmamus, infantes 
 sanctis parentibus natos esse ex Chr. auctoritate baptizandos. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. 27 : Baptism is not only a sign of 
 profession and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are 
 discerned from others that be not christened, but it is also a 
 sign of regeneration, or new birth, whereby, as by an instru- 
 ment, they that receive baptism rightly are grafted into 
 the church; the promises of forgiveness of sin, and of our 
 adoption to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly 
 signed and sealed ; faith is confirmed, and grace increased by 
 virtue of prayer unto God. The baptism of young children is 
 in anywise to be retained in the church, as most agreeable 
 with the institution of Christ. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxviii sec. 4 : Not only those that do 
 actually profess faith in and obedience unto Christ, but also 
 the infants of one or both believing parents, are to be baptized. 
 Sec. 5 : Although it be a great sin to contemn or neglect this 
 ordinance, yet grace and salvation are not so inseparably an- 
 nexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated or saved 
 without it, or that all that are baptized are undoubtedly re- 
 generated. Sec. 6 : The efficacy of baptism is not tied to that 
 moment of time wherein it is administered ; yet, notwithstand- 
 ing, by the right use of this ordinance, the grace promised is 
 

 
 258 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 not only offered, but really exhibited and conferred by the 
 Holy Ghost, to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace 
 belongeth unto, according to the counsel of God's own will, in 
 His appointed time. Sec. 7 : The sacrament of baptism is 
 but once to be administered to any person. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 34: Credimus, omnem hominem, qui id 
 satagit, ut vitam aeternam consequatur, semel unico baptismo 
 illo, qui in posterum non iteretur, baptizari debere. (Infantes 
 fidelibus parentibus natos) baptizandos et foederis signo obsig- 
 nandos esse credimus, sicuti olim infantes circumcidebantur 
 in Israele propter easdem promissiones infantibus nostris factas 
 cet. 
 
 Cf. Cat. Heidelb. Fr. 74; Cat. Genev. p. 524 sq. 
 
 The Salvation of Infants. 
 
 The necessity of baptism to salvation is carried so far by 
 the Eoman Catholic Church, that they regard Christian chil- 
 dren unbaptized as forfeiting heavenly blessedness. Against 
 this the Conf. Scot, expressly protests, nor does the Declar. 
 Tkorun. admit the absolute necessity of baptism. [The Form. 
 Cone, does not pronounce definitively. However, the framers 
 of that formula, in common with other dogmatic theologians, 
 taught that not the deprivation, but the contempt, of the 
 sacrament condemns.] 
 
 I. EOMAN. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 2. 34 : Hortandi sunt magnopere fideles, ut 
 liberos suos, cum primum id sine periculo facere liceat, ad 
 ecclesiam deferendos et solennibus cerimoniis baptizandos 
 curent. Nam cum pueris infantibus nulla alia salutis com- 
 parandae ratio, nisis eis baptismus praebeatur, relicta sit, facile 
 intelligitur, quam gravi culpa illi sese obstringant, qui eos 
 sacramenti gratia diutius, quam necessitas postulet, carere 
 patiantur cet. 
 
 Bellarmine, Bapt. i. 4, represents the question in controversy 
 between Catholics and Protestants, whether baptism is neces- 
 sary as a means of salvation, so that he who is not baptized 
 perishes, notwithstanding the excuse of his neglect of the
 
 BAPTISM. 259 
 
 precept having sprung from ignorance. He asserts that the 
 church has always believed that infants perish if they depart 
 this life without baptism, and seeks further to demonstrate 
 this faith of the church by copious argument, ending by this : 
 Etiamsi parvuli sine sua culpa non baptizantur, non tamen 
 sine sua culpa pereunt, cum habeant peccatum originale. 
 Though they are not guilty of neglecting baptism, they do not 
 perish without guilt, for they have original sin. Of. also 
 Klee, kath. Dogm. iii. 114. As to the Iambus Infantum, see 
 No. xvii. 
 
 II. PEOTESTANT. 
 
 Conf. Scot neg. p. 127: Detestamur crudele (rom. Anti- 
 christi) judicium contra infantes sine baptismo morientes. 
 
 Declar. Thorun. ii. 6, bapt. 2 : Necessitatem baptism! adeo 
 absolutam non statuimus, ut quicunque sine bapt. externo ex 
 hac vita excesserit sive infans sive adultus, quocunque in casu 
 etiam citra omnem contemtum accidat, propterea necessario 
 damnandus sit. Hie potius regulam illam maxime valere 
 credimus, quod non privatio sed contemtus sacrarnenti damnet. 
 
 Calvin, Institt. christ. iv. 16. 26 : Explodendum esse eorum 
 commentum palam est, qui omnes non baptizatos seternse 
 morti adjudicant. Solis ergo adultis administrari baptismum 
 ex eorum postulate fingamus : quid puero fieri dicent, qui 
 pietatis rudimentis rite probeque imbuitur, dum tinctionis dies 
 appetit, si subita morte proeter spem omnium abripi contingat ? 
 Clara est domini promissio, quicunque in filium credidit, non 
 visurum mortem, nee in judicium venturum, sed transiisse a 
 morte in vitam ; nondum baptizatum nullibi damnasse com- 
 peritur. Quod in earn a me partem accipi nolo, perinde ac si 
 baptismum contemn! impune posse innuerem (quo contemtu 
 violatum iri domini fcedus affirmo, tantum abest ut excusare 
 sustineam), tantum evincere sufficit, non esse adeo necessarium, 
 ut periisse protinus existimetur, cui ejus obtinendi ademta 
 fuerit facultas. Atqui si eorum commento assentimur, eos 
 omnes citra exceptionem damnabimus, quos a baptismo casus 
 aliquis prohibuerit, quantacunque alioqui fide prseditos, per 
 quam Christus ipse possidetur. Insuper infantes omnes
 
 260 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. , 
 
 aeternae mortis reos peragunt, quibus baptismum negant su& 
 ipsorum confessione ad salutem necessarium. Viderint mine, 
 quam belle sibi cum Christ! verbis conveniat, quibus regnuin 
 coelorum illi setati adjudicatur. Atque ut nihil illis non con- 
 cedamus, quantum ad hujus loci intelligentiam attinet, nihil 
 tamen inde elicietur, nisi prius, quod jam constitutum est a 
 nobis, dogma de infantium regeneration everterint. S. Hei- 
 degger, Corp. theol. xxv. 60 sq. 
 Cf. Limborch, Theol. chr. v. 68. 7. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 As it is the prevalent Protestant doctrine, that only believers ex- 
 perience the sacramental virtue of baptism (above, xiv. 3), the ques- 
 tion naturally arose, whether baptized infants could have faith. In 
 the symbols this point has never been discussed or set forth at 
 length. But the older dogmatists taught, in harmony with Luther's 
 well-known utterance, Cat. Maj. p. 546, that baptism itself wrought 
 faith in infants. They appeal to Matt. xix. 13-15, xviii. 6; Mark 
 xv. 16. 
 
 III. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Catccli. Racov. p. 222 (final revision): Numquid ad bap- 
 tismum infantes pertinent ? Si quidem veteris apost. eccl. 
 morem spectes et finem, in quern hie ritus fuit ab apostolis 
 institutus, ad infantes non pertinet, cum in scripturis nee 
 mandatum nee exemplum ullum hac de re habeamus, nee ipsi 
 fidei in Chr. . . . adhuc capaces sint. . . . Tamen errorem 
 (paedobaptismi) adeo inveteratum et perviilgatum Christiana 
 caritas tolerare suadet. 
 
 Socin. Bapt. aquce, c. 17, p. 737, a: De eorum baptismo, 
 qui ex parentibus pro fratribus agnitis et receptis nascuntur, 
 ita statuo, ut, quando . . . non, vel si infantes baptizentur, id 
 per se ipsum quidquam mali parere posse videtur, potestas 
 unicuique fiat suos infantes vel baptizandi vel secus. . . . 
 Hanc infantium suorum baptizandi vel non baptiz. libertatem 
 ad eos etiam extendimus, qui turn primum ad Ch. ecclesiam 
 sunt aggregandl
 
 BAPTISM. 261 
 
 IV. ARMINIAN. 
 
 Apolog. Eemonstr. c. xxiii. p. 247 : Eemonstrantes ritum 
 baptizandi infantes ut perantiquum . . . haud illubenter etiam 
 in coetibus suis admittunt adeoque vix sine offensione et 
 scandalo magno intermitti posse statuunt; tantum abest, ut 
 eum seu illicitum aut nefastum improbent ac damnent. Sed 
 nee arbitrantur tamen propterea, eum ut praecise observatu 
 necessarium vel ex prsecepto Ch. vel ex traditione apost. vel 
 alia aliqua" cert& atque indubitata auctoritate tenendum, urgen- 
 dum aut imperandum esse. 
 
 Cf. Curcellaeus, De pecc. orig. Ivi. p. 913. Limborch, Theol. 
 christ. v. 68. 19 sqq., although he zealously defends infant 
 baptism against the Anabaptists, reaches the same issue. But 
 he contends earnestly against the error that unbaptized 
 Christian children are condemned (iii. 5. 2), and says : Omnes 
 infantes, sicut per Adamum moriendi necessitati subjiciuntur, 
 ita nostro judicio ex morte liberantur per Chr., sive baptizati 
 sint sive non ; non enim gratia div. ita huic signo alligata est, 
 ut deus extra illud earn non communicet. John vii. 5 is re- 
 ferred to adults only. 
 
 V. ANABAPTIST. 
 
 As to the older Anabaptists, via. F. C. 826. From the Men- 
 nonite symbols we extract a few notes : 
 
 Ris, Conf. art. 31 : Aqua baptizantur in nomine patris et 
 Sp. s., qui doctrinam sancti evangelii audiunt, credunt et 
 libenter posnitenti corde accipiunt. Tales enim jussit Christus 
 baptizari, scd neutiquam infantes. 
 
 In the Conf. of the Frisians and Germans the baptism of 
 adults is alone mentioned. And in the Frank. Verh. infant 
 baptism is rejected, as not ordained by Christ: Infantes 
 salvari absque baptismo per merita Christi, et nemini signum 
 baptismi convenire quam credenti. Schyn, P. D. 236. 
 
 Horn. Bdk. art. 21 (Germ.): The baptism of young and 
 unintelligent infants is by good reasons rejected. We hold it 
 for a plant of man from the kingdom of Antichrist, which 
 ought to be clean rooted out, since nowhere in the New
 
 262 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Testament is it commanded, or any trace of it in the apostles' 
 words or writings. It is, in truth, no other than a contempt 
 and violation of Christ's true baptism, and in many respects 
 its very antagonist 
 
 Re-baptism, which was usual among the Anabaptists and 
 Mennonites, is condemned, A. 0. p. 12; Apol. 156; F. C. 
 623; Conf. Helv. ii. c. 20. It concerned partly those who, 
 as the children of Christians, had already been baptized, but 
 as adults entered their church, partly those who had been ex- 
 communicated or cast out of the Mennonite congregations. 
 The re-baptism of these latter was soon abandoned by the 
 Mennonites themselves as an unscriptural abuse. The re- 
 baptism of the former, however, continued long a usage, but is 
 now relinquished very generally by these churches. The Con- 
 fession of the Frisians says only : Hominem sub conditione 
 verse poenitentiae et scriptures conformis fidei semel baptizatum 
 nunquam rebaptizamus. 
 
 VI. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers hold the baptism of infants to be a mere 
 human tradition, of which there is neither example nor pre- 
 cept in the whole Scripture. Barclay, Apol. Prop. 12. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 I. HERETICAL BAPTISM. 
 
 The baptism of heretics, if performed in the name of the Holy 
 Trinity, and with intention, is accepted as valid by the Roman and 
 Greek Churches: Cone. Trid. sess. vii. can. 4; Conf. orth. 157. But 
 in the Russian Church there prevailed for a long time the rebaptiza- 
 tion of the converts: Heinecc. ii. 256. Even in the Roman Church, 
 here and there zealous priests have thought fit to rebaptize their 
 converts from Protestantism. The Protestant Church has never 
 practised this. Sim. Episcop., Resp. ad Dilemm., holds it for indiffe- 
 rent, whether those baptized in heresy be rebaptized or not. The 
 validity of baptism performed in the Roman Church is expressly ad- 
 mitted in Conf. Gall. art. 28. 
 
 II. FORM OF BAPTISM. 
 
 The Greek Church has always adopted a triple immersion (xard- 
 xaradveffdai rplg It rip vdan). Conf. orth. p. 157 ; Metr. Critop.
 
 BAPTISM. 263 
 
 Conf. 86 ; Jeremias, in Actis, 238. In the Western Church, Roman 
 and Protestant, with the exception of the Baptists, sprinkling is alone 
 adopted, although in Cat. Maj. p. 548 in aquam mergi is spoken of. 
 The Greeks lay great stress on the immersion ; but to the Westerns, 
 the manner in which the water is applied to the baptized is matter 
 of indifference. Cf. Cat. Rom. ii. 2. 17 ; Limborch, Th. ch. v. 68. 
 Jeremias condemns in the Romanists their single sprinkling ; but cf. 
 Bossii Inst. ih. ii. 380. The Socinians are opposed to sprinkling 
 generally. Cat. Eac. p. 222. l Exorcism has been practised always 
 by the Roman Church among the ceremonies of baptism ; and the 
 older Protestants retained it. 
 
 III. LAY BAPTISM. 
 
 The Roman, Greek, and Protestant Churches permit, under press- 
 ing circumstances, baptism by unordained hands, including those of 
 the midwife, or even of persons not Christians. Conf. orth. p. 159 : 
 sig xaipov rtvog avayKrig y/A'ZoptT va rb Ka^ri TO (ivarrrfiov roiJro %ai xoff- 
 ftiKbv vpoauffov avdpbg 73 ywatxog. Cat. Rom. ii. 2. 24 : Cogente neces- 
 sitate baptizare possunt omnes etiam de populo sive mares sive 
 foeminse, quamcunque illi sectam profiteantur. Nam Judseis quoque, 
 infidelibus et hasreticis cum necessitas cogit, hoc munus permissum 
 est. But in these cases the baptismal ceremonies must be preter- 
 mitted. Bellarm. De lapt. i. 7 ; Gerhard, Loc. theol. ix. 95. The 
 Reformed Church has declared against this baptism in distress. Conf. 
 Helv. ii. 20 ; Conf. Scot. 22 ; Calvin, Institt. iv. 15. 
 
 IV. BAPTISM OF BELLS. 
 
 This, which is a kind of benediction, vid. A. Smalc. p. 337 ; Conf. 
 Scot. neg. 127. 
 
 1 Non recte dicis, eos infantes baptizare ; non enim baptizant, quod sine totius 
 corporis in aquam imtnersione et ablutione fieri nequit, sed verticetcnus tantum 
 leviter adspergunt . . . quern tamen errorem . . . Christiana caritas tolerare 
 suadet.
 
 XVI. 
 
 THE LOED'S SUPPER. 
 
 FIRST POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 THE Christian communities which celebrate the Lord's Supper 
 as a religious ordinance instituted by Christ, regard it either 
 as a mere ceremony of thanksgiving and profession, or as a 
 means of grace in which is imparted to the recipients some 
 heavenly blessing. The former is the view of the Socinians, 
 the Arminians, and the Mennonites. The latter is that of the 
 Eomanists, Greeks, and Protestants generally ; although with 
 many differences as to the definition of the nature of what is 
 imparted. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Cat. Jlac. qu. 334: (Coena domini) est Christi institutum, 
 ut fideles ipsius panem frangant et comedant et ex calice 
 bibant, mortis ipsius annuntiandse causa. Quod permanere in 
 adventum ipsius oportet. 
 
 /&. qu. 335: (Annuntiare mortem domini) est publice ac 
 sacrosancte Christo gratias agere, quod is pro ineffabili sua 
 erga nos caritate corpus suum torqueri et quodammodo frangi 
 et sanguinem suum fundi passus sit, et hoc ipsius beneficium 
 laudibus tollere et celebrare. 
 
 J&. qu. 337: Nonne alia causa, ob quam ccenam instituit 
 dominus, superest ? Nulla prorsus. Etsi homines multas ex- 
 
 264
 
 THE LOED'S SUPPER. 265 
 
 cogitarint, cum alii dicant esse sacrificium pro vivis et mortuis. 
 Alii usu ipsius se consequi peccatorum remissionem et firmare 
 fidem sperant, et quod eis mortem domini in mentem revocet, 
 affirmant. 
 
 Ib. qu. 344 : Verum sensum (verborum hoc est corpits meum) 
 facile intelliges, si animadverteris, et in sacris literis et vulgo 
 admodum esse usitatum, ut figurae et imagines et signa memo- 
 rialia appellentur earum renim nominibus, quarum sunt ima- 
 gines cet. Quare cum Ch. vellet hoc ritu a nobis annuntiari 
 mortem suam cruentam cum quadam illius adumbratione et 
 repraesentatione, ideo dixit, paneni hunc, qui frangitur, esse 
 corpus suum, . . . h. e. signum memoriale et figuram quandam 
 esse corporis sui cet. 
 
 Socin. De ccend dom. p. 753 b: Quod omnes fere opinantur, 
 hoc ritu . . . confirmari saltern fidem nostram, ne id quidem 
 verum censeri debet, cum nee ullo sacro testimonio compro- 
 betur nee ratio ulla sit, cur id fieri possit. Quomodo enim 
 confirmare potest nos in fide id, quod nos ipsi facimus cet. 
 P. 754 b : Animadvertendum est, posse quidem in ipsa ccena 
 dom. celebranda confirmari et augeri fidem, sed non ex ipsa 
 panis et vini sumtione, nee ex virtute aliqua divina" . . ., sed 
 ex mutuis cohortationibus mutuoque Ch. praeceptis obedientiae 
 exemplo, ex solenni ilia commemoratione et concelebratione 
 beneficiorum dei et Christi, et denique ab ipso divino verbo 
 toti cerimoniae adjuncto. 
 
 II. AEMINIAN. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. xxiii. 4 : S. coena est alter Novi Test, sacer 
 ritus, a Jesu Christo ea qua proditus fuit nocte institutus, ad 
 celebrandum eucharisticam et solennem mortis suae commemo- 
 rationem, in quo fideles, postquarn se ipsos explorarunt inque 
 vera fide approbarunt, sacrum panem in ccetu publice fractum 
 edunt et simul vinum publice fusum bibunt, idque ad cruen- 
 tam domini mortem pro nobis obitam (qua sicut corpora nostra 
 cibo et potu seu pane et vino sustentantur, ita corda nostra in 
 spem vitse aeternse aluntur et nutriuntur) cum solenni gratia- 
 rum actione annuntiandum, suamque vicissim cum crucifixo 
 Christi corpore et efifuso sanguine (sive cum ipso Jesu Ch. pro
 
 266 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 nobis crucifixo et mortuo), eoque beneficiis omnibus per mortem 
 Jesu Christi partis atque acquisitis, vivificam et spiritualem 
 communionem et mutuam simul inter se caritatem coram deo 
 et ecclesia publice testificandam. Against the orthodox Ee- 
 formed doctrine, vide Limborch, Theol. christ. v. 71. 9 sqq. 
 
 Eis, Conf. art. 34 : Tota externae coense actio nobis ante 
 oculos ponit, testatur et significat, Christi sanctum corpus in 
 cruce fractum . . . esse ad remissionem peccatoram nostrorum, 
 ilium jam in coelis glorificatum animarum nostrarum esse 
 panem vivificantem. Per earn docemur inter externam illam 
 actionem corda nostra sursum elevare sanctis supplicationibus, 
 atque verum et summum bonum hac coen& adumbratum a 
 Christo petere; tandemque nos adhortatur, ut deo agamus 
 gratias atque unitatem et caritatem inter nos exerceamus. 
 
 III. GKEEK AND EOMAN. 
 
 Conf. ortlwd. p. 169 sq. : Ol Kaprcoi rov p-vart^plov rovrov 
 etvai rovrot' rcpvnov rj avdjivrjcns rov ava^aprrjrov rrddovs KOI 
 rov Oavdrov rov Xpi&rov ... TO Sevrepov #epSo? elvai, Siarl 
 TO fivar. rovro ylverai iXcta-pos KOI KaXocrvvrj/Jia TT^O? rov 6ebv 
 Sia TO? cifj,aprias TJ/JLUV eire ^wvrwv elre teal aTroOa^evcov ... TO 
 rpLrov Sid<f)opov elvai OTTOV oTroto? xpicrriavos evpicricerai, rrapwv 
 (Tv^va et? rrjv 6vo~iav ravrrjv KOI va KOIVWVO. rov ^var^p. rovrov, 
 e\evOep(overat 8t' avroO arrro icdda Treipao-fJLov teal ntvBwov &ia- 
 fto\ov cet. 
 
 ConciL Trid. sess. xiii. euchar. cap. 2 : Sumi voluit Ch. sa- 
 cramentum altaris tanquam spiritualem animarum cibum, quo 
 alantur et confortentur viventis vita illius, qui dixit: qui 
 manducat me cet (Joh. vi) et tanquam antidotum, quo libe- 
 remur a culpis quotidianis et a peccatis mortalibus prseserve- 
 mur. Pignus prseterea id esse voluit futurse nostrse glorise et 
 perpetuse felicitatis adeoque symbolum unius illius corporis, 
 cujus ipse caput exsistit cet. Can. 5 : Si quis dixerit vel 
 praecipuum fructum eucharistiae esse remissionem peccatorum 
 vel ex e, non alios fructus provenire, anath. sit. 
 
 Catcch. Eom. ii 4. 47 sqq. Bellarmine, against the Protes- 
 tants: Eucharistiam non remittere peccata mortalia, quorum 
 homo conscientiam habet, et ideo requirij ut antea purgentur
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 267 
 
 (sacramento pcenitentiae). We give a more precise statement 
 than is generally found, from Bossii Institute theol. iii. p. 155 
 sq. : Primus effectus est augmentum gratiae sanctificantis s. 
 vitae spiritualis, quod scholastic! gratiam secundam vocant 
 homini justo per modum nutritionis collatam; secundus est 
 remissio peccatorum venialium (cf. Cat. Rom. ii. 4. 52), non 
 autem mortalium; tertius est diminutio fomitis et concupi- 
 scentiae; quartus perseverantia in justitia; quintus est re- 
 missio pcenae temper, peccato debitse: accedentes enim ad 
 ejusmodi sacram. commemoramus deo sacrificium illud, quo 
 mirum in modum divina justitia 'delinita fuit per superabun- 
 dantem satisfactionem ; sextus est immortalitas carnis nostrae ; 
 septimus est suavitas, dulcedo ac delectatio mirifica, qua jus- 
 torum animse perfunduntur cet. 
 
 IV. PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 99 : Instituta est ccena domini, ut recorda- 
 tione promissionum Christi, quarum in hoc signo admonemur, 
 confirmetur in nobis fides et foris confiteamur fidem nostram 
 et praedicemus beneficia Christi. 
 
 Cat. maj. p. 555: Ideo ad sacramentum (altaris) accedimus, 
 ut ejusmodi thesaurum ibi accipiamus, per quern et in quo 
 peccatorum remissionem consequamur. Siquidem propterea 
 a Christo jubeor edere et bibere, ut meum sit mihique utili- 
 tatem adferat veluti certum pignus et arrabo, imo potius res 
 ipsa, pro peccatis meis, morte et omnibus malis ille opposuit 
 et oppignoravit. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 21 : Retinere vult dominus ritu hoc sacro 
 in recenti memorial maximum generi mortalium praestitum 
 beneficium, nempe quod tradito corpore et effuso suo sanguine 
 omnia nobis peccatja nostra condonavit ac a morte aeterna et 
 potestate diaboli nos redemit, jam pascit nos sua" carne et 
 potat suo sanguine, quae vera fide spiritualiter percepta alunt 
 nos ad vitam aeternam. Et hoc tantum beneficium renovatur 
 toties, quoties ccena domini celebratur. . . . Obsignatur item 
 hac ccena s., quod revera corpus domini pro nobis traditum et 
 sanguis ejus in remissionem peccatorum nostrorum effusus est, 
 ne quid fides nostra vacillet. Et quidem visibiliter hoc foris
 
 268 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 sacramento per ministrum repraesentatur et veluti oculis con- 
 templandum exponitur, quod intus in anima invisibiliter per 
 ipsum Spiritum s. prsestatur. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 35 : Convivium hoc mensa est spiritualis, 
 in qua Christus seipsum nobis cum omnibus bonis suis com- 
 municat efficitque, ut in ilia tarn ipsomet, quam passionis 
 mortisque ipsius merito fruamur, miseram nostram animam 
 omnique solatio destitutam carnis sua3 esu nutriens corrobo- 
 rans et consolans sanguinisque sui potu reficiens ac recreans. 
 
 Cat. Heidelb. Fr. 76 : What is it to eat the crucified body, 
 and to drink His shed blood ? It is not only with believing 
 hearts to appropriate the suffering and death of Christ, and 
 thereby receive forgiveness and eternal life, but also to become 
 more and more incorporated with His blessed body, through 
 the Holy Ghost, who liveth at once in Him and in us. 
 
 Thus the main difference between the Eomanists and Pro- 
 testants in respect to the virtue of the Supper is this, that the 
 Protestants refer it, though not alone, to the forgiveness of 
 sins ; while the Eomanists, excluding the forgiveness, refer it 
 to the grace of sanctification. 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 The Confessions of the Protestant Churches differ from one 
 another in this, that the Lutherans, like the Romanists and 
 Greeks, teach a substantial presence of the body and blood of 
 Christ in the Supper, and a corporeal participation of the same 
 by the mouth under the bread and wine, or their forms. The 
 Reformed Churches deny both. 
 
 [As it regards the positive doctrine of the Reformed, 
 Zwingli contends against the presence of the body of Christ 
 in the Supper, and any partaking of it. Calvin endeavoured 
 to mediate between the Zwinglian view and that of the Augs- 
 burg Confession. He maintains, it is true, that the body of 
 Christ is in heaven, and thus cannot be present in, with, and 
 under the bread ; but still he thinks that the believing soul 
 rises to heaven in the participation of the bread and wine,
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 269 
 
 and there unites itself with. Christ. Calvin interprets the 
 words of institution as Zwingli does, that the is means sig- 
 nifies, and, like him, contends against the notion that unbe- 
 lievers partake in the Supper of the body and blood of Christ.] 
 Before giving the testimonies of the symbols, we shall insert 
 the teachings of Zwingli and Calvin from their private writings. 
 
 I. THE EUCHAE1STIC DOCTRINE OF ZWINGLI AND 
 CALVIN, AS TAKEN FROM THEIR WRITINGS. 
 
 Zwingli's views were pronounced in 1523, in the following 
 words of the address sent by the Council of Zurich to pastors 
 and preachers : " The Supper of the Lord is no other than a 
 feast of the soul ; and Christ instituted it as a remembrance 
 of Himself. When a man entrusts himself to the passion 
 and redemption of Christ, he is saved. A sure visible sign of 
 this He has left in the emblems of His body and blood ; and 
 bids them both eat and drink in remembrance of Himself." 
 Further, we may quote : 
 
 Zwingli, De verd et falsa Tel. (Opp. iii. 263) : Est ergo sive 
 eucharistia sive synaxis sive ccena dominica nihil aliud, quam 
 commemoratio, qua ii, qui se Christi rnorte et sanguine fir- 
 miter credunt patri reconciliatos esse, hanc vitalem mortem 
 annunciant, hoc est laudant, gratulantur et prsedicant. Jam 
 ergo sequitur, quod qui ad hunc usum aut festivitatem con- 
 veniunt mortem domini commemoraturi, hoc est annunciaturi, 
 sese unius corporis esse membra, sese unum panem esse ipso 
 facto testentur. . . . Qui ergo cum Christianis commeat, quum 
 mortem domini annunciant, qui simul symbolicum panem aut 
 carnem edit, is nimirum postea secundum Christi prsescriptum 
 vivere debet, nam experimentum dedit aliis, quod Christo fidat ; 
 qui ergo eo fidunt, debent ambulare, sicut et ipse ambulavit. 
 
 Epist. ad princip. German. (Opp. ii. p. 545 b) : In eucha- 
 ristia res est, ex fide gratias agere domino pro beneficiis, qua3 
 nos per filium suum redimendo prastitit ; panis et vini sacro- 
 rum symbolorum divinis verbis sanctificatorum sumtio ejus 
 rei sacramentum est ; gratiarum ergo actio non est vel pecca- 
 torum remissio vel panis et vinum Christi corpus naturale, sed 
 ea tantummodo significat atque in rem prsesentem velut addu-
 
 270 CONFESSIONS OF CHEISTEN'DOM. 
 
 cit repraesentando et contemplation! fidei oflferendo. P. 546 
 a : Cum panis et vinum, quae ipsis domini verbis consecrata 
 sunt, simul fratribus distribuuntur, an non jam totus Chr. 
 velut sensibiliter (ut etiam si verba requirantur, plus dicam, 
 quam vulgo solet) sensibus etiam offertur ? Sed quomodo ? 
 anne corpus ipsum naturale, manibus et palato tractandum ? 
 Minima, sed animo offertur istud contemplanduni, sensui vero 
 sensibile ejus rei sacramentum. P. 546 b: Nos nunquam 
 negavimus, corpus Ch. sacramentaliter ac in mysterio esse in 
 coena, turn propter fidei contemplationem turn propter symbol!, 
 ut diximus, totam actionem. 
 
 Calvin, Instit. iv. 17. 10: Summa sit non aliter animas 
 nostras carne et sanguine Christi pasci, quam panis et vinum 
 corporalem vitam tuentur et sustinent. Neque enim aliter 
 quadraret analogia signi, nisi alimentum suum animae in Christo 
 reperirent, quod fieri non potest, nisi nobiscum Christus vere 
 in unum coalescat nosque reficiat carnis suae esu et^ sanguinis 
 potu. Etsi autem incredibile videtur in tanta locorum dis- 
 tantiS, penetrare ad nos Christi carnem, ut nobis sit in cibum, 
 meminerimus, quantum supra sensus omnes nostros emineat 
 arcana Spiritus sancti virtus et quam stultum sit, ejus immen- 
 sitatem modo nostro velle metiri. Quod ergo mens nostra 
 non comprehendit, concipiat fides, spiritum vere unire, quse 
 locis disjuncta sunt Jam sacram illam carnis et sanguinis 
 sui communicationem qua vitam suam in nos transfundit 
 Christus, non secus, ac si in ossa et medullas penetraret, in 
 ccenS, etiam testatur et obsignat, et quidem non objecto inani 
 aut vacuo signo, sed efficaciam spiritus sui illic proferens, qua 
 impleat quod promittit. Et sane rem illic signatam offert et 
 exhibet omnibus, qui ad spirituale illud epulum accumbunt, 
 quanquam a fidelibus solis cum fructu percipitur, qui tantam 
 benignitatem vera fide animique gratitudine suscipiunt. 1 1 : 
 Dico igitur, in coenae mysterio per symbola panis et vini 
 Christum vere nobis exhiberi adeoque corpus et sanguinem 
 ejus, in quibus omnem obedientiam pro comparand^ nobis jus- 
 titia adimplevit, quod scilicet primum in unum corpus cum 
 ipso coalescamus, deinde participes substantiae ejus facti, in 
 bonorum omnium communicatione virtutem quoque sentiamus. 
 16 : Alii fatentur, panem ccense vere substantiam esse terreni
 
 THE LOED'S SUPPER. 271 
 
 et corraptibilis element! nee quidquam in se pati mutationis, 
 sed sub se habere inclusum Chr. corpus. Si ita sensum suum 
 explicarent, dum panis in mysterio porrigitur, annexam esse 
 exliibitionem corporis, quia inseparables est a signo suo veritas, 
 non valde pugnarem. 1 8 : Si oculis animisque in ccelum evehi- 
 mur, ut Christum illic in regni sui gloria guceramus, quemadmo- 
 dum symbola nos ad eum integrum invitant, ita sub panis symbolo 
 pascemur ejus corpore, sub mni symbolo distincte ejus sanguine 
 potalimur, ut demum toto ipso perfruamur. Nam tametsi car- 
 nem suam a nobis sustulit et corpore in ccelum ascendit, ad 
 dextram tamen patris sedet, hoc est in potentia" et maj estate et 
 gloria patris regnat. Hoc regnum nee ullis locorum spatiis limi- 
 tatum nee ullis dimensionibus circumscription, quin Christus 
 virtutem suam, ubicunque placuerit, in coelo et in terra exserat, 
 quin se praesentem potential et virtute exhibeat. 1 9 : Nos 
 vero talem Christi prsesentiam in coena statuere oportet, quse 
 nee panis elemento ipsum affigat nee in panem includat nee 
 ullo modo circumscribat (quae omnia derogare ccelesti ejus 
 glorias, palam est), deinde quse nee mensuram illi suam auferat 
 vel pluribus simul locis distrahat vel immensam illi magni- 
 tudinem affingat, quse per ccelum et terram diffundatur ; liaac 
 enim naturae humanae veritati non obscure repugnant. Istas, 
 inquam, duas exceptiones nunquam patiamur nobis eripi : ne 
 quid ccelesti Christi glorise derogetur quod fit, dum sub cor- 
 ruptibilia hujus mundi elementa reducitur, vel alligatur ullis 
 terrenis creaturis; ne quid ejus corpori affingatur humanae 
 natur83 minus consentaneum, quod fit dum vel infinitum esse 
 dicitur, vel in pluribus simul locis ponitur. Cseterum his 
 absurditatibus sublatis, quicquid ad exprimendam veram sub- 
 stantialemque corporis ac sanguinis domini communicationem, 
 quae sub sacris cosnse symbolis fidelibus exhibetur, facere 
 potest, libenter recipio ; atque ita ut non imaginatione dun- 
 taxat aut mentis intelligentia percipere, sed ut te ipsa frui in 
 alimentum vitae eeternae intelligantur. 
 
 II. SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 Conf. Basil 7 (Germ.) : As in baptism, wherein the wash- 
 ing away of sins is declared, water remains, so in the Lord's
 
 272 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Supper, wherein . . . the true body and blood of Christ is 
 figured and offered, bread and wine remain. But we sted- 
 fastly hold that Christ Himself is the food of believing souls 
 unto eternal life ; and that our souls, through a true faith in 
 the crucified Christ, are fed and refreshed by the flesh and 
 blood of Christ ; and thus that we, members of His body who 
 is our Crown, Head, live in Him, and He in us. And there- 
 fore we confess that Christ in His holy Supper is present to 
 all those who truly believe ; [and conclude that the natural 
 and true body of Christ, which was born of the pure Virgin, 
 suffered for us, and ascended to heaven, is not in the bread 
 and wine given by the Lord.] 
 
 Wakrh. Be}:, der D. d. K. in Zurich, 1545: "We teach 
 that the remembrance of the body offered and blood shed for 
 the forgiveness of sins, is the great substance and end of the 
 Supper, and that the great hope of the sacrament reaches 
 simply to that. But this remembrance cannot be without 
 a true faith. And although the things of which we preserve 
 the remembrance cannot be again corporeally seen or become 
 present, not the less is renewed therein. The believing ap- 
 prehension and the assurance of faith make in some sense 
 present to the believing mind the past transactions of our 
 soul's redemption. He hath verily eaten the flesh of Christ 
 . . . who truly believeth in Christ, God and man, for us 
 crucified, whose faith is eating, and whose eating is faith. . . . 
 Believers have in the Supper no other lifegiving food than 
 they have without it. ... The believer there and not there 
 receives in one manner and in one way of faith one food, 
 which is Christ : save that in the Supper the act is performed 
 and the sign observed according to the command of Christ, 
 with testimony and thanksgiving and consecration to duty. . . . 
 Christ's flesh accomplished our salvation on earth; it is no 
 more conversant on earth ; it is not here below." 
 
 Conf. Helv. i art 22 : . . . ccenam mysticam (esse), in qu 
 dominus corpus et sanguinem suum, i. e. se ipsum suis vere 
 ad hoc offerat, ut magis magisque in illis vivat et illi in ipso ; 
 non quod pani et vino corpus domini et sanguis vel naturaliter 
 uniantur vel hie localiter includantur vel ulla hue carnali 
 praesentia statuantur, sed quod panis et vinum ex institutione
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPEE. 273 
 
 domini symbola sint, quibus ab ipso domino per ecclesiae 
 ministerium vera corporis et sanguinis ejus communicatio 
 non in periturum ventris cibum sed in seternse vitse alimoniam 
 exhibeatur. 
 
 Consens. Trigur. No. 21 : Tollenda est quselibet localis 
 prsesentise imaginatio. Nam quum signa hie in mundo sint, 
 oculis cernantur, palpentur manibus : Christus quatenus homo 
 est, non alibi quam in crelo, nee aliter quam mente et fidei 
 intelligentia quaerendus est. Quare perversa et impia super- 
 stitio est, ipsum sub elementis hujus mundi includere. 
 
 /&. No. 2 2 : Proinde, qiii in solennibus ccense verbis : hoc 
 est corpus meum, hie est sanguis meus, prsecise literalem, ut 
 loquuntur, sensum urgent, eos tanquam prseposteros interpretes 
 repudiamus. Nam extra controversiam ponimus, figurate ac- 
 cipienda esse, ut esse panis et vinum dicantur id quod signi- 
 ficant. Neque vero novum hoc aut insolens videri debet, ut 
 per metonymiam ad signum transferatur rei figuratee nomen, 
 quum passim in scripturis ejusmodi locutiones occurrant, et 
 nos sic loquendo nihil asserimus ; quod non apud vetustissi- 
 mos quosque et probatissimos ecclesiee scriptores exstet. No. 
 2 3 : Quod autem carnis suse esu et sanguinis potione, quse hie 
 figurantur, Christus animas nostras per fidem Spiritus sancti 
 virtute pascit, id non perinde accipiendum, quasi fiat aliqua 
 substantise vel commixtio vel transfusio, sed quoniam ex 
 carne semel in sacrificium oblata et sanguine in expiationem 
 effuso vitam hauriamus. [No. 25 : Quia corpus Christi, ut 
 fert humani corporis natura et modus, finitum est et ccelo, ut 
 loco continetur, neccsse est a nobis tanto locorum intervallo 
 distare, quanta calum, abest a terra. And in the same Conf., 
 in Niemeyer, S. 15 : Abest igitur Christus a nobis secundum 
 corpus ; spiritu autem suo in nobis habitans, in ccelum ad se 
 ita nos attollit, ut vivificum carnis suse vigorem in nos trans- 
 fundat. . . . Bensus pietatis clare dictat, non aliter vitam ex 
 carne sua in nos stillare, quam dum, totus secundum corpus in 
 ccelo nianens, ad nos sud virtute dcsccndit.] 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 36 : Quamvis (Christus) nunc sit in ccelis, 
 ibidem etiam mansurus donee veniat mundum judicaturus, 
 credimus tamen, eum arcanS, et incomprehensibili spuritus sui 
 virtute nos nutrire et vivificare sui corporis et sanguinis (sub- 
 
 s
 
 274 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 stantia) per fidem apprehensa. Dicimus autem hoc spiritualiter 
 fieri, non ut efficacise et veritatis loco imaginationem aut cogi- 
 tationem supponamus, sed potius, quoniam hoc mysterium 
 nostrae cum Christo coalitionis tarn sublime est, ut omnes 
 nostros sensus totumque adeo ordinem naturae superet, denique 
 quondam cum sit divinum ac coeleste, non nisi fide percipi et 
 apprehendi potest. Art. 37 : Affinnamus, eos, qui ad sacram 
 mensam domini puram fidem afferunt, vere recipere, quod sibi 
 signa testificantur, nempe corpus et sanguinem J. Ch. cet. 
 
 Conf. Helv. iL c. 2 1 : Ut rectius et perspicacius intelligatur, 
 quomodo caro et sanguis Christi sint cibus et potus fidelium 
 percipianturque a fidelibus ad vitam aeternam, paucula haec 
 adjiciemus. Manducatio non est unius generis. Est enim 
 manducatio corporalis, qua cibus in os percipitur ab nomine, 
 dentibus atteritur et in ventrem deglutitur. Hoc manducationis 
 genere intellexerunt olim Capernaitae sibi manducandam carnem 
 domini, sed refutantur ab ipso Joan. 6. Nam, ut caro Christi 
 corporaliter manducari non potest citra flagitium aut trucu- 
 lentiam, ita non est cibus ventris. Est et spiritualis mandu- 
 catio corporis Christi, non ea" quidem, existimemus cibum 
 ipsum mutari in spiritum, sed qua manente in sua essentia et 
 proprietate corpore et sanguine domini ea nobis communi- 
 cantur spiritualiter, utique non corporali modo, sed spiritual! 
 per Spiritum sanctum, qui videlicet ea, quae per carnem et 
 sanguinem domini pro nobis in mortem tradita, parata sunt, 
 ipsam inquam remissionem peccatorum, liberationem et vitam 
 aeternam, applicat et confert nobis, ita ut Christus in nobis 
 vivat et nos in ipso vivamus, efficitque ut ipsum, quo talis 
 sit cibus et potus spiritualis noster, id est vita nostra, ver 
 fide percipiamus. Sicut enim cibus et potus corporalis corpora 
 nostra non tantum reficiunt ac roborant, sed et in vita con- 
 servant, ita et caro Christi tradita pro nobis et sanguis ejus 
 effusus pro nobis non tantum reficiunt et rdborant animas 
 nostras, sed etiam in vit& conservant, non quatenus quidem 
 corporaliter nobis a spiritu dei communicantur, dicente domino : 
 Et panis, quem ego dabo, caro mea est, quam dabo pro mundi 
 vita Caro (nimirum corporaliter manducata) non prodest 
 quidquam, spiritus est, qui vivificat. Et hie esus carnis et 
 potus sanguinis domini ita est necessarius ad salutem, ut sine
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 275 
 
 ipso millus servari possit. Fit autem hie esus et potus spiri- 
 tualis etiam extra domini coenam et -quoties aut ubicunque 
 homo in Christum crediderit. 
 
 Ib. c. 21 : Prseter superiorem manducationem spiritualem 
 est et sacramentalis manducatio corporis domini, qua fidelis 
 non tantum spiritualiter et interne participat vero corpore et 
 sanguine domini, sed foris etiam accedendo ad mensam domini 
 accipit visibile corporis et sanguinis domini sacramentum. 
 Prius quidem, dum credidit fidelis, vivificum alimentum per- 
 cepit et ipso fruitur adhuc, sed ideo, dum sacramentum quoque 
 accipit, nonnihil accipit. Nam in continuatione communi- 
 cationis corporis et sanguinis domini pergit, adeoque magis 
 magisque incenditur et crescit fides ac spirituali alimonia re- 
 ficitur. Dum enim vivimus, fides continuas habet accessiones. 
 Et qui foris vera fide sacramentum percipit, idem ille non 
 signum duntaxat percipit, sed re ipsa quoque, ut diximus, 
 fruitur. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 35 : Christus testificatur, nos, quam vere 
 hoc sacramentum manibus nostris accipimus et tenemus 
 illudque ore comedimus et bibimus, unde postmodum vita 
 nostra sustentatur, tarn vere etiam nos fide (quse animaB 
 nostKe et manus et os est) in animis nostris recipere veruin 
 corpus et verum sanguinem Christi, unici servatoris nostri, ad 
 vitam nostram spiritualem. Nequaquam erraverimus dicentes, 
 id quod comeditur esse proprium et naturale corpus Christi, 
 idque quod bibitur proprium esse sanguinem. At manducandi 
 modus talis est, ut non fiat ore corporis, sed spiritu per fidem. 
 
 Conf. Ancjl. p. 94 : Panem et vinum dicimus esse sacra 
 et ccelestia mysteria corporis et sanguinis Christi, et illis 
 Christum ipsum, verum panem seternae vitse, sic nobis prse- 
 sentem exhiberi, ut ejus corpus sanguinemque per fidem vere 
 sumamus. Non tamen id ita dicimus, quasi putemus, naturam 
 panis et vini prorsus immutari atque abire in nihilum, quem- 
 admodum multi proximis istis seculis somniarunt neque adhuc 
 potuerunt unquam satis inter se de suo somnio convenire. 
 P. 95: Nee tamen, quum ista dicimus, extenuamus ccenam 
 domini, aut earn frigidam tantum cerimoniam esse docemus et 
 in ea nihil fieri, quod multi nos docere calumniantur. Christum 
 enim asserimus vere sese prassentem exhibere ... in coena, ut
 
 276 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 eum fide et spiritu comedanms et de ejus cruce ac sanguine 
 habeamus vitam seternam. Idque dicimus non perfunctorie 
 et frigide, sed re ipsa et vere fieri. Etsi enim Christi corpus 
 dentibus et faucibus non attingimus, eum tamen fide, mente, 
 spiritu tenemus et premiums. Neque vero vana ea fides est, 
 quse Christum complectitur, nee frigide percipitur, quod mente, 
 fide, et spiritu percipitur. Ita enim nobis in illis mysteriis 
 Christus ipse totus, quantus quantus est, offertur et traditur, 
 nt vere sciamus, esse jam nos carnem de ejus carne et os de 
 ossibus ejus, et Christum in nobis manere et nos in illo. 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. xxviii : The body of Christ is given, taken, 
 and eaten in the Supper, only after a heavenly and spiritual 
 manner ; and the mean whereby the body of Christ is received 
 and eaten in the Supper is faith. 
 
 West. Canf. ch. xxix. sec. 7 : Worthy receivers, outwardly 
 partaking of the visible elements in this sacrament, do then 
 also inwardly by faith, really and indeed, yet not carnally 
 and corporally, but spiritually, receive and feed upon Christ 
 crucified, and all benefits of His death : the body and blood of 
 Christ being then not corporally or carnally in, with, or under 
 the bread and wine ; yet as really, but spiritually, present to 
 the faith of believers in that ordinance, as the elements them- 
 selves are to their outward senses. 8 : Although ignorant and 
 wicked men receive the outward elements in this sacrament, 
 yet they receive not the thing signified thereby ; but by their 
 unworthy coming thereunto are guilty of the body and blood 
 of the Lord, to their own damnation. Wherefore all ignorant 
 and ungodly persons, as they are unfit to enjoy communion 
 with Him, so are they unworthy of the Lord's table, and can- 
 not, without great sin against Christ, while they remain such, 
 partake of these holy mysteries, or be admitted thereunto. 
 
 Conf. Scot. art. 21 : Credimus . . ., quod in ccena domini 
 rite usurpata Chr. ita nobis conjungitur, quod sit ipsissimum 
 animarum nostramm nutrimentum et pabulum, non quod panis 
 in naturale Ch. corpus . . . transsubstantiationem ullam ima- 
 ginemur . . ., sed unio hsec et conjunctio, quam habemus 
 cum corpore et sanguine J. C. . . ., operatione Sp. s. efficitur, 
 qui nos vera" fide supra omnia quse videntur quseque carnalia 
 et terrestria sunt, vehit et ut vescamur corpore et sanguine J.
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 277 
 
 Ch. semel pro nobis effusi et fracti efficit, quodque nunc est in 
 ccelo, et in praesentia patris pro nobis apparet. Et quamvis 
 magna sit loci distantia inter corpus ipsius nunc in ccelis 
 glorificatum et nos nunc in his terris mortales, nihilominus 
 tamen finniter credimus, panem quern frangiinus, esse com- 
 munionem corporis cet. Sic, quod fideles in recto usu ccense 
 dom. ita edere corpus et bibere sanguinem J. Ch. confitemur, 
 et certo credimus, quod ipse in illis et illi in ipso manent, imo 
 ita fiunt caro de carne et os de ossibus ejus, quod sicut seterna 
 deitas carni J. Ch. vitam et immortalitatem tribuit, ita etiam 
 caro et sanguis ejus, dum a nobis editur et bibitur, easdem 
 nobis prserogativas confert. 
 
 Gat. Gen. p. 525 sqq. : Ccena s. ideo a Chr. instituta est, 
 ut corporis et sanguinis sui communicatione educari in spem 
 vitse set. animas nostras nos doceret idque nobis certum red- 
 deret. Nam cum in eo sita sit tota salutis nostrse fiducia, ut 
 accepta nobis feratur obedientia ipsius, quam patri prsestitit, 
 perinde ac si nostra foret: ipsum a nobis possideri necesse 
 est. Neque enim bona nobis sua aliter communicat, nisi dum 
 se nostrum facit. Ilia communicatio (in c. s.) nobis con- 
 firmatur et augetur. Tametsi enim turn in baptismo turn 
 evangelio nobis exhibetur Christus, eum tamen non recipi- 
 mus totum sed ex parte tantum. Quid ergo in symbolo panis 
 habemus ? Corpus Ch., ut semel pro nobis ad nos deo re- 
 conciliandos immolatum fuit, ita nunc quoque nobis dari, ut 
 certo sciamus, reconciliationem ad nos pertinere. . . . Cum 
 dominus Chr. ipsa sit veritas, niinime dubium est, quin pro- 
 missiones, quas dat illic nobis, simul etiam impleat et figuris 
 suam addat veritatem. Quam ob rem non dubito. quin, sicuti 
 verbis et signis testatur, ita etiam suse nos substantise participes 
 faciat, quo in unam cum eo vitam coalescamus. Hoc miri- 
 fica arcanaque spiritus sui virtute efficit, cui difficile non est 
 sociare, quse locorum intervallo alioqui sunt disjuncta. 
 
 Catetfi. Heidelb. Fr. 76 : What is it to eat the crucified 
 body of Christ, and to drink His shed blood ? It means, not 
 only with thankful hearts to appropriate the passion of Christ, 
 and thereby receive forgiveness of sins and eternal life, but also 
 and therein, through the Holy Ghost, who dwelleth in Christ 
 and in us, to be more and more united to His blessed body ;
 
 278 CONFESSIONS OF CHEISTENDOil. 
 
 so that, although He is in heaven, and we are upon earth, vre 
 nevertheless are flesh of His flesh and bone of His bones, and 
 live for ever one spirit with Him. 
 
 Confess. Palat. p. 152 sq. : Credo, in sacra ccena credenti- 
 bus non minus quam discipulis in prima ccenS, verum tradi- 
 tumque et crucifixum Ch. corpus una cum omnibus ejus 
 ccelestibus thesauris et donis, quse sua morte suis acquisivit, 
 ut sit famelicse ipsorum animse cibus, ... a Ch. ipso porrigi 
 et distribui . . . Credentes nihil impedit distantia loci, quo 
 minus corpus illud Ch. edamus et sanguinem ejus bibamus, 
 etiamsi Ch. illo ipso naturali suo corpore nunc non sit amplius 
 in terris cet. Sufficit scire nos ex ejus verbo, ipsum suo illo 
 corpore neque visibili neque invisibili, neque comprehensibili 
 neque incomprehensibili modo in terris esse velle, et tamen 
 nihilo minus tanquam omnipotens dei filius et semper et 
 ubique sua gratia et Sp. sancto prsesto est suis, imprimis autem 
 in sacra susi ccena, ubi ipse et cibi prsebitor et cibus ipse est. 
 
 Declar. Thor. p. 61: Nequaquam statuimus nuda, vacua, 
 inania signa, sed potius id quod significant et obsignant simul 
 exhibentia, tanquam certissima media et efficacia instrumenta, 
 per quse corpus et sanguis Christi adeoque Christus ipse, cum 
 omnibus suis beneficiis, singulis vescentibus exhibetur sen 
 ofiertur, credentibus vero confertur, donatur et ab ipsis in 
 cibum aniinse salutarem et vivificum acceptatur. Nequaquam 
 eiiam negamus veram corporis et sanguinis Christi in ccen& 
 prsesentiam, sed tantum localem et corporalem prsesentiae 
 modum et unionem cum elementis substantialem, ipsam vero 
 nobiscum prsesentiam sancte credimus, et quidem non imagi- 
 nariam, sed verissimam, realissimam et efficacissimam, nempe 
 ipsam illam Christi nobiscum unionem mysticam, quam ipsemet, 
 ut per verbum promittit et per symbola offert, ita per spiritum 
 efficit, quamque nos per fidern acceptamus, per caritatem senti- 
 mus, secundum vetus illud dictum : motum sentimus, modum 
 nescimus, prsesentiam credimus. Unde et patet, noji solam 
 virtutem, efficaciam, operationem aut beneficia Christi nobis 
 prsesentari et communicari, sed inprimis ipsam substantiam 
 corporis et sanguinis Christi seu ipsam illam victimam, quse 
 pro mundi vita data est et in cruce mactata, ut per fidelem 
 hujus victimse communionem et cum Christo ipso unionem
 
 THE LOKD'S SUPPEK. 279 
 
 consequenter etiam meritorum et beneficioram sacrificio ejus 
 partorum participes siinus et sicut ipse in nobis, ita nos in 
 ipso maneamus. Et quidem non tantum quoad animam, sed 
 etiam quoad corpus nostrum, etsi enim, ut ore corporis rem 
 terrenam, ita fide cordis ceu organo proprio rem ccelestem 
 acceptamus, tamen fide ilia mediante non solum anima?, sed et 
 ipsa corpora nostra Christi corpori per ejusdem spiritum ad 
 spem resurrectionis et vitse seternas inseruntur et uniuntur, ut 
 simus caro de came ejus et os de ossibus ejus adeoque unum 
 cum ipso corpus mysticum. 
 
 Confess. Brand. 8 : Two things are found there : the external 
 signs, and the true body of Christ which was given to death 
 for us, with the sacred blood, which was also poured out for 
 us. These are partaken of in a double manner also, the 
 bread and wine with the mouth,. the true body and blood 
 properly only by faith. The words of institution make no 
 difference to the bread and wine which still remain : these are 
 His holy body and blood sacramentally, in the same way as 
 God instituted and appointed the holy sacraments of both the 
 Old and the New Testaments, that they might be His visible 
 and true signs of invisible grace. And the Lord Christ Him- 
 self shows that the Holy Supper is a sign, yet not a bare and 
 empty sign, of the new covenant, instituted in remembrance 
 of Christ ; or, as the Apostle Paul, 1 Cor. XL 2 6, declares, for 
 an abiding memorial and setting forth of His death, that it 
 might be a remembrance of consolation, of thanksgiving, and 
 of love. 9 : And inasmuch as faith is the mouth, as it were, by 
 which the crucified body and His poured-out blood are taken 
 and received, Sr. Churf. Gn. strongly insist that to the unbe- 
 lievers and impenitent such a sacrament signifies nothing ; 
 they are not partakers of the true body and blood of Christ. 
 
 The Eeformed doctrine of the Supper cannot be any further 
 illustrated from the documents; and, in fact, the manifold 
 particular Confessions which the literature of the Eeformed 
 Church contains on this dogma, present nothing different from 
 what these universal Confessions exhibit. We mention only 
 two of these particular Confessions. The one is a fundamental 
 account of the Supper of the Lord drawn from the clear writ- 
 ings of Scripture, of the early church, and compared with the
 
 280 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Augsburg Confession, by theologians of the University of 
 Heidelberg, 1574. The other is the Apologia modesta of the 
 Swiss churches, 1575, which is a defence against the Articles 
 on the Supper, issued at Torgau, and printed 1574. 
 
 THIRD POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 Those Confessions which maintain a real presence of the 
 body of Christ in the Supper are again once more divided. 
 1. The Roman and Greek Churches assert a change of the 
 substance of the bread and wine, consequent upon the con- 
 secration of the priest, into the substance of the body and 
 blood of Christ, the result of which only the accidens of the 
 elements remain. 2. The Lutheran Church, however, teaches 
 only a presence of the body aud blood of Christ further not 
 capable of explanation, being sacramental, and wrought by 
 the omnipotence of God in, with, and under the bread and 
 wine, which, as received, retain their substance. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. ROMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiii eucharist. cap. 4 : Quoniam Christus 
 redemtor noster corpus suuni id, quod sub specie panis offere- 
 bat, vere esse dixit, ideo persuasum semper in ecclesia dei 
 fuit, idque nunc denuo sancta hsec synodus declarat, per con- 
 secrationem panis et vini conversionem fieri totius substantive 
 panis in substantiam corporis Christi, et totius substantise vini 
 in substantiam sanguinis ejus: quae conversio convenienter 
 et proprie a sancta catholica ecclesia transsiibstantiatio est 
 appellata. 
 
 Ib. cap. 1 : Principio docet synodus in almo sanctae eucha- 
 ristiae sacramento post panis et vini consecrationem Jesuni 
 Christum, verum deum atque hominem, vere, realiter ac sub- 
 stantialiter sub specie illarum rerum sensibilium contineri ; 
 nee enim hsec inter se pugnant, ut ipse salvator noster semper
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 281 
 
 ad dexteram patris in ccelis assideat juxta modum exsistendi 
 naturalem, et ut multis nihilominus aliis in locis sacramen- 
 taliter prsesens sua substantia nobis adsit, ea exsistendi ratione, 
 quam etsi verbis exprimere vix possumus, possibilem tamen 
 esse deo, cogitatione per fidem illustrata assequi possumus et 
 constantissime credere debemus. 
 
 Ib. can. 2 : Si quis dixerit, in sacrosancto eucharistiae sacra- 
 mento remanere substantiam panis et vini, una cum corpore 
 et sanguine Jesu Christi, negaveritque mirabilem illam et sin- 
 gularem conversionem totius substantiae panis in corpus et 
 totius substantise vini in sanguinem, manentibus duntaxat 
 speciebus panis et vini, quam quidem conversionem catholica 
 ecclesia aptissime transsubstantiationem appellat, anathema sit. 
 
 Cat. Horn, ii 4. 37: Docebunt (pastores), panis et vini sub- 
 stantiam in sacramento (euchar.) post consecrationem non re- 
 manere. Hoc vero quamvis maximam admirationem merito 
 liabere possit, tamen cum eo, quod prius demonstratum est, 
 necessario conjungitur. Etenim si est verum Chr. corpus sub 
 panis et vini specie post consecrationem, omnino necesse est, 
 cum ibi antea non esset, hoc vel loci mutatione vel creatione 
 vel alterius rei in ipsum conversione factum esse. At vero 
 fieri non posse constat, ut corpus Ch. in sacramento sit, quod 
 ex uno in alium locum venerit. Ita enim fieret, ut a coeli 
 sedibus abesset, quoniam nihil movetur, nisi locum deserat, a 
 quo movetur. Creari autem corpus Ch. minus credibile est ac 
 ne in cogitationem quidem cadere hoc potest ; relinquitur ergo, 
 ut in sacramento sit corpus domini, quod panis in ipsum con- 
 vertatur. Quare nulla panis substantia remaneat necesse est. 
 Cf. 41, 26. . . . A marvellous deduction from this change is 
 thus stated in qu. 45, perpetua et constans cathoL eccl. doc- 
 trina : Cum demonstratum sit, corpus dom. et sanguinem vere 
 in sacramento esse, ita ut amplius nulla subsit panis et vini 
 substantia, quoniam ea accidentia, Ch. corpori et sanguini 
 inhaerere non possunt, relinquitur, ut supra omnem naturae 
 ordinem ipsa se nulla alia re nisa sustentent. 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Down to the unsettlement of faith occasioned by Cyril 
 Lucar, there was in the Greek Orthodox Church only the doc-
 
 282 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 trine of the early Greek Fathers on the Eucharist, with the 
 ancient and customary formulas ; and the explanatory com- 
 ments of Jeremias will not mislead any who are familiar with 
 that doctrine and its phraseology, into the notion that this 
 divine had in his thoughts any proper transubstantiation, or 
 any change of the sacramental elements whereby the substance 
 of the latter should cease to exist Cf. Heinecc. ii 278. 
 
 Jerem. in Act. Wirtemb. p. 86 : Ao^a^ei 97 K.a0o\iKT) e'/c/cX?;- 
 ala, OTI fMTa TOV ayiaa-fjiov 6 fiev apro? yuera/SaXXerai et9 avTo 
 TO ercu/za TOV Xpiarov, 6 Be dlvos et9 avro TO alpa, Bia Trvev- 
 JJMTOS ayiov. 'O yap Kvpio? rfj vv/crl y TrapeBiBoTO, Xa/Saw 
 dprov . . . e/cXaae ical etTre . . . oijre JJLTJV Tore BoOelarj^ rfjs 
 <rapKO<; TOV /cvptov, f)v e<j>6pei, et? fipwaiv Tot? a7ro<7ToXoi9, . . . 
 rj vvv ev ry 6ela nvaTarjar/ia KaTaj3aivovTO<; TOV tcvpiatcov 
 (TWfjLaTos % ovpavov . . ., aXXa /cat TOTC nal vvv p.eTa.7roiovp,evov 
 Kal /z,era/3aXXo/4ei/ov Ty 7riK\r]<rt Koi %dpiTt TOV Trz/ei^aro? 
 Bia TWV 6ei(av /cat iepuv ev^wv KOI Xoytatv, TOV ^ev apTov 
 et? auro TO Kvptov (7(t)fj.a, TOV Se oivov et? auTo TO Kvpiov alp-a. 
 d p. 102. 
 
 Still more simply does Metr. Critop. express himself, but 
 not hinting at any change. Confess, p. 100 : "o-Tt to? aX^- 
 ^w? aiofj,a Xpurrov 6 lepovpyovpevos apTOS, /cat TO eV TU> 
 pup al/Mi Xpi&Tov avafi(f)i8o\a)<i' o Be T^OTTO? TTJS 
 /LteTa/3oX^9 ayvto&ros rj/uv teal avepfirjvevro^' TCTa/iieurat yap 
 TGI? e/cXe/crot? ^ irepl TWV TOLOVTWV (rafajveia. ev Ty /3a<7iXei'a 
 T&V ovpav&v, iva Bia TT}? 077X179 /cat airepiepyov irio-Te<os /^t- 
 ^01/09 ^a/JtT09 Tvxpiev irapa TOV Oeov. 
 
 In polemical opposition, as against Cyril Lucar, 1 was the 
 Eomish notion of a mutatio substantial, or /xerovcrtW^ (already 
 current among the Greeks), sanctioned as a dogma. 
 
 Conf. ortlwd. p. 166: npeirei va e%y 6 iepevs T0iav~r)v 
 yv<ofjt.7)v et9 TOV icaipov, OTTOV ayid^et, TO. Bupa, 7rw9 avTrj 17 ovcrut 
 
 1 Cyrilli Lncaris Conf. p. 38 : *E r l<y%iiflm TOV ftufrnfiou <rov-rtu (of the 
 
 Supper) *i S/axa>/ rrti a>.r,fn xai >lf>a.'nt,i rttfevfieti rtu KVf'nu r.fiui 'lr,feu Xfiffnv 
 Iftti.eyctJftit xxi Virrtvofiir' irX f,t n ritTi; rtfj.li ra.^ffrr.fi xcci trparfipti, ei>% fit n 
 I $soffh7a-a. tixn $i$uffxii purtuffiuns' MMVMyMf yap rev; trifrovi ptrat-afiifrtinvras ' 
 T* SuVxw T fufj.0, rev xvp'nu ii/jwi 'itirou Xpirrou irfiui' tux. alffftirZ; <ro7s iiiurt ?fj- 
 %er<ras xeii amXueiras TW ft'.rci/.r.^iY, a./.).a 7y rr.s ^u^ra alffttjtlt xinuioutraf ft 
 yif rufjut, rtu xvpiau tux Iffrtt %-rif i rS ftuertipiy TOI; If0at.ft.e7j tfecrai 11 xa.\ >.aft.- 
 fiiinrcii, iXX' trip Tiiuf4,a.rtxSit h *itTts /.a^sura, r.ftTt xa.ftffreiKi n xcii %mfSmu*
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 283 
 
 TOV apTOv Kal 97 ovcla TOV oivov fJ,Ta{3d\\eTat, els rrjv ov<riav TOV 
 a\r]dLVov <7co/u,aro9 Kal a r i/j.aro<; TOV Xpicrrov, 8ia TT}? evepyetas 
 rov ayiov TTi/euyuaro?, ov Trjv 7rtK\.r]criv KcifMei TTJV &pav K,ivr)v. 
 
 Ib. p. 167: MeTa TO, pr/paTa TavTa 17 fjLTov<ria;o~i<; vrapevdv? 
 yiveTat, teal aXKrjaei o apTos et? TO aXridtvov aw^a TOV XpiaTov, 
 fcal o olvos et? TO aXriOwov alpa' airo^evovTai, fjt,6vov TO, eiSr) 
 OTTOV (fraivovvTai, Kal TOVTO icaTa Trjv Oeiav oiKovopiav. 
 
 On the subsequent fates of the doctrine of transubstantiation 
 in the Greek Church, cf. Schrockh. It is clearly laid down in 
 Dosithei Conf. c. 17, and the Lutheran doctrine is to him \iav 
 
 The doctrine of transubstantiation is rejected, A. Sm. p. 330 ; 
 F. C. pp. 602, 756 ; Conf. Wirtemb. p. 115 ; Declar. Conf. Hdv. 
 i. art. 22 ; Conf. Angl p. 94 sq.; Eng. Artt. 28 ; Conf. Scot. art. 
 21 ; Heidelb. FT. 78; Declar. Tlwrun. p. 62 (Calvin, Institut. 
 iv. 17. 12 sqq.); Conf.Eemonst. xxiii. 5 ; Cat. Racov. qu. 341. 
 
 III. LUTHERAN SYMBOLS. 
 
 C. A. p. 12: De ccenS, domini decent, quod corpus et san- 
 guis Christi vere adsint et distribuantur vescentibus in ccena 
 domini, et improbant secus docentes. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 330 : De Sacramento altaris sentimus, panem et 
 vinum in ccena esse veruni corpus et sanguinem Christi, et non 
 tantum dari et sumi a piis sed etiam ab impiis christianis. 
 De transsubstantiatione subtilitatem sophisticam nihil curamus, 
 qua fingunt, panem et vinum relinquere et amittere naturalem 
 suam substantiam et tantum speciem et colorem panis et non 
 verum panem remanere. Optime enim cum s. s. congruit, 
 quod panis adsit et maneat, sicut Paulus ipse nominat : panis 
 quern frangimus, et : ita edat de pane. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 157: Confitemur, nos sentire, quod in ccena 
 domini vere et substantialiter adsint corpus et sanguis Christi 
 
 0(11 aXitffif IffTiv IffSltiv fiua; xa.1 f&tri%iiv y.xi JM/WMVf (ivai, lav flfrtiuifut' la* au 
 
 yrifnum^v, jravro; tipiis TW fivfTnf'nu xipbovs aQiffra.affa.1 cet. The following anti- 
 thesis retains the early traditional view: Cyrilli Berrhceens. Cens. synod, p. 76 : 
 
 A.ya.e -f/,!x. X^^XXw do'yf&otTt^ovTf xxt iriff-'TiuovTi u^n wsT^/SaXXso'Fa/ TJV t^"< T/>> vrpocttfiuf 
 cifrov, xxi i<ri TOV oTvov OIK rn; nu Itfias tuXoy/aj xoit muftia-fis ay/of \fityoivnftus tl; 
 aXi^j ffupa. JCK", afpa. Xftrrau. And Parthen., p. 129, vindicates, against Lucaris, 
 only the prseseutia vera corporis Christi
 
 284 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 et vere exhibeantur cum illis rebus, quse videntur, pane et 
 vino, his, qui sacramentum accipiunt. 
 
 Cat. maj. p. 553: Quid est itaque sacramentum altaris ? 
 Eesp. est verum corpus et sanguis domini nostri Jesu Christi 
 in et sub pane et vino per verbum Christi nobis christianis ad 
 manducandum et bibendum institutum et mandatum. 
 
 F. C. p. 599: Credimus, quod in ccena domini corpus et 
 sanguis Christi vere et substantiality sint praesentia, et quod 
 una cum pane et vino vere distribuantur atque sumantur. 
 Credimus, verba testamenti Christi non aliter accipienda esse, 
 quam sicut verba ipsa ad literam sonant, ita, ne panis absens 
 Christi corpus et vinum absentem Christi sanguinem signifi- 
 cent, sed ut propter sacramentalem unionem panis et vinum 
 vere sint corpus et sanguis Christi. Cf. p. 736. Docent, 
 quemadmodum in Christo duae distinctae et non mutatae naturae 
 inseparabiliter sunt unitce, ita in sacra ccena duas diversas sub- 
 stantias, panem videlicet naturalem et verum naturale corpus 
 Christi in instituta sacramenti administratione hie in terris 
 simul esse praesentia. 
 
 76. p. 604: Prorsus rejicimus atque damnamus capernaiti- 
 cam manducationem corporis Christi, quam nobis sacramentarii 
 contra suae conscientiae testimonium post tot nostras protesta- 
 tiones malitiose affingunt, ut doctrinam nostram apud auditores 
 suos in odium adducant, quasi videlicet doceamus, corpus 
 Christi dentibus laniari et instar alterius cujusdam cibi in cor- 
 pore humano digeri. Credimus autem et asserimus secundum 
 clara verba testamenti Christi veram, sed supernaturalem man- 
 ducationem corporis Christi quemadmodum etiam vere, super- 
 naturaliter tamen, sanguinem Christi bibi docemus. Haec 
 autem humanis sensibus aut ratione nemo comprehendere 
 potest, quare in hoc negotio, sicut et in aliis fidei articulis, 
 intellectum nostrum in obedientiam Christi captivare oportet. 
 Hoc enim mysterium in solo dei verbo revelatur et sola fide 
 comprehenditur. 
 
 Cf. Cortf. Wirtcnib. p. 115. 
 
 Reservation and Adoration of the Host. 
 
 Since, in Roman doctrine, through consecration the true 
 body of Christ has for ever and substantially taken the place
 
 THE LOED'S SUPPER. 285 
 
 of the bread and wine, that Church appoints the consecrated 
 Host : 1. To be exhibited in the mass to the faithful for their 
 adoration, as also the cup ; 2. To be reserved as venerabile 
 (in the monstrance or sanctuary), to be exhibited to venera- 
 tion, to be carried round in processions for the same purpose. 
 [According to evangelical doctrine, any reservation of the body 
 and blood of Christ is out of the question ; for it is present 
 only in ipso usu. As it regards the adoration, the Book of 
 Concord shows that this belongs, not to the bread and the 
 wine, but to Christ the God-man, who is present in His 
 Supper truly and substantially.] 
 
 I. EOMISH SYMBOLS. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiii. cap. 3 : Illu'd in eucharistia excellens 
 et singulare reperitur, quod reliqua sacramenta tune primum 
 sanctificandi vim habent, cum quis illis utitur, at in eucharistia 
 ipse sanctitatis auctor ante usum est. 
 
 /&. can. 4 : Si quis dixerit, peracta consecratione in eucha- 
 ristise sacramento non esse corpus et sanguinem Jesu Christi, 
 sed tantum in usu, dum sumitur, non autem ante vel post et 
 in hostiis seu particulis consecratis, quse post communionem 
 reservantur vel supersunt, non remanere verum corpus domini, 
 anathema sit. Can. 6 : Si quis dixerit, in eucharistiae sacra- 
 mento Christum non esse cultu latriaB etiam externo adoran- 
 dum atque ideo nee festiva peculiar! celebritate venerandum 
 neque in processionibus solenniter circumgestandum vel non 
 publice, ut adoretur, populo proponendum et ejus adoratores esse 
 idololatras, anathema sit. Cf. cap. 5, where among other things 
 we read : Declarat praterea sancta synodus, pie et religiose 
 admodum in dei ecclesiam inductum fuisse hunc morem, ut 
 singulis annis peculiari quod am et festo die prsecelsum hoc et 
 venerabile sacramentum singular! veneratione ac solemnitate 
 celebraretur, utque in processionibus reverenter et honorifice 
 illud per vias et loca publica circumferretur. 
 
 /&. can. 7 : Si quis dixerit, non licere sacram eucharistiam 
 in sacrario reservari, sed statim post consecrationem adstanti- 
 bus necessario distribuendam, aut non licere, ut ilia ad infir- 
 aaos honorifice deferatur, anathema sit.
 
 286 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 The Greeks also reserve the remainder of the consecrated 
 elements as XeA/raz/a aw/wiTo? KOI at/xaro? Xpurrov, but they do 
 not bear them about in processions for adoration : Metr. Critop. 
 Conf. c. 9, p. 10 3. It is taught in Dosithei Conf. c. 1 5, that 
 already before the use, that is, in the consecration, Christ is 
 bodily present in the Supper. 
 
 II PROTESTANT. 
 
 F. C. p. 729 : Extra usum, dum reponitur aut asservatur 
 in pixide aut ostenditur in processionibus, ut fit apud Papistas, 
 sentiunt non adesse corpus Christi, [ . . . tamen porrecto pane 
 sentiunt simul adesse et vere exhiberi corpus Christ!] P. 
 760 : Negamus, elementa ilia seu visibiles species benedicti 
 panis et vini adorari op'ortere. [Quod autem Christus ipse, 
 verus deus et homo, qui in ccen& sua, in legitimo nimirum ejus 
 usu, vere et substantialiter prsesens est, in spiritu et in veri- 
 tate . . . adorari debeat, id nemo, nisi Arianus hsereticus nega- 
 verit] C p. 749. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. xxviii. : The sacrament of the Lord's 
 Supper was not by Christ's ordinance reserved, carried about, 
 lifted up, or worshipped. Cf. Conf. Scot. art. 22 ; Dec. Thor. 63. 
 
 West. Conf. ch. xxix. sec. 2 : In this sacrament Christ is 
 not offered up to His Father, nor any real sacrifice made at all 
 for remission of sins of the quick or dead ; but only a com- 
 memoration of that one offering up of Himself, by Himself, 
 upon the cross, once for all, and a spiritual oblation of all pos- 
 sible praise unto God for the same ; so that the Popish sacri- 
 fice of the mass, as they call it, is most abominably injurious 
 to Christ's one only sacrifice, the alone propitiation for all the 
 sins of the elect. Sec. 3 : The Lord Jesus hath, in this ordi- 
 nance, appointed His ministers to declare His word of institu- 
 tion to the people, to pray, and bless the elements of bread 
 and wine, and thereby to set them apart from a common to a 
 holy use ; and to take and break the bread, to take the cup, 
 and (they communicating also themselves) to give both to the 
 communicants, but to none who are not then present in the 
 congregation. Sec. 4 : Private masses, or receiving this sacra- 
 ment by a priest, or any other alone ; as likewise the denial
 
 THE LOKD'S SUPPEK. 287 
 
 of the cup to the people ; worshipping the elements, the lift- 
 ing them up, or carrying them about for adoration, and the 
 reserving them for any pretended religious use ; are all con- 
 trary to the nature of this sacrament, and to the institution 
 of Christ. Sec. 5 : The outward elements in this sacrament, 
 duly set apart to the uses ordained by Christ, have such rela- 
 tion to Him crucified, as that truly, yet sacramentally only, 
 they are sometimes called by the name of the things they 
 represent, to wit, the body and blood of Christ; albeit in 
 substance and nature they still remain truly and only bread 
 and wine, as they were before. Sec. 6 : That doctrine which 
 maintains a change of the substance of bread and wine into 
 the substance of Christ's body and blood (commonly called 
 transubstantiation) by consecration of a priest, or by any other 
 way, is repugnant not to Scripture alone, but even to common 
 sense and reason ; overthroweth the nature of the sacrament ; 
 and hath been and is the cause of manifold superstitions, yea, 
 of gross idolatries. 
 
 Conf. Eemonstr. xxiii. 5 : . . . tantum abest, ut symbola 
 quasi corporis et sanguinis Christi latibula religiose nobis ado- 
 randa sint hocque ipso fine aut publice in templis proponenda 
 aut ciboriis includenda, aut in processionibus circumgestanda 
 cet. 
 
 FOUKTH POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 While the Greeks, Protestants, Arminians, Mennonites, and 
 Socinians believe that the Lord's Supper is perfectly received 
 only in its twofold form, the Romish Church limits its dis- 
 pensation to the bread in the case of the laity and of the 
 sacerdotes non conficientes or priests not officiating, 1 maintaining 
 that Christ is altogether present under each of the two forms. 
 
 1 Sacerdos conficiens is the minister who consecrates and dispenses. Why 
 he, and he alone, communicates sub utrdque is explained thus by Eck, Loci, 
 c. 9 : Consecrans utramque speciem consecrat, quia agitur repraesentatio 
 dominicse passionis, ideo corpus et sanguis simul sub utraque sp. consecrantur, 
 et sacerdos in persona populi offert et sumit sub utraque sp., in cujus persona 
 totus populus quadam spiritali sumtione se sanguinem Ch. bibere, gaudenter 
 debet credere.
 
 288 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 I. ROMISH SYMBOLS. 
 
 Concil. Constant, sess. xiii. : Concil. declarat, quod, licet . . . 
 in primitive eccL hujusmodi sacramentum reciperetur a fideli- 
 bus sub utr&que sp., tamen haec consuetude ad evitandum 
 aliqua pericula et scandala est rationabiliter iutroducta, quod 
 a conficientibus sub utraque sp., et a laicis tantummodo sub 
 sp. panis suscipiatur. . . 1 Praecipimus sub poena excommu- 
 nicationis, quod nullus presbyter communicet populum sub 
 utraque specie panis et vini. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiii. euchar. can. 3 : Si quis negaverit, in 
 venerabili sacramento eucharistiae sub unaquaque specie et sub 
 singulis cujusque speciei partibus separatione facta totum 
 Christum contineri, anath. sit. Cf. sess. xxi. cap. 3, can. 3. 
 
 Ib. sess. xxi. cap. 1 : Sancta synodus, a Spiritu sancto . . . 
 edocta atque ipsius ecclesiae judicium et consuetudinem secuta, 
 declarat ac docet, nullo divino praecepto laicos et clericos non 
 conficientes obligari ad eucharistiae sacramentum sub utraque 
 specie sumendum, neque ullo pacto salva" fide dubitari posse, 
 quin illis alterius speciei communio ad salutem sumciat. 
 Cap. 2 : Agnoscens ecclesia suam in administratione sacra- 
 mentorum auctoritatem, . . . gravibus et justis de caussis 
 adducta hanc consuetudinem sub altera specie commuuicandi 
 approbavit et pro lege hdbendam decrevit, quam reprobare aut 
 sine ipsius ecclesiae auctoritate pro libito mutare non licet. 
 Cf. can. 2. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 4. 6 : Multis et iis quidem gravissimis ra- 
 tionibus adductam esse ecclesiam patet, ut hanc potissimum 
 sub alter& specie communicandi consuetudinem non solum 
 approbaret, sed etiam decreti auctoritate firmaret. Primum 
 enim maxime cavendum erat, ne sanguis domini in terram 
 funderetur : quod quidem facile vitari posse non videbatur, 
 si in magnS, populi multitudine eum ministrare oportuisset. 
 Praeterea, cum sacra" eucharistia aegrotis praesto esse debeat, 
 magnopere timendum erat, ne si diutius vini species asser- 
 varetur, coacesceret. Permulti praeterea sunt, qui vini saporem 
 ac ne odorem quidem perferre ullo modo possint. Quare ne 
 quod spiritualis salutis causa dandum est, corporis valetudini 
 noceret, prudentissime sancitum est ab ecclesia, ut panis tan-
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPEK. 289 
 
 tummodo speciem fideles acciperent. Accedit ad alias rationes, 
 quod in pluribus provinciis summa vini penuria laboratur : 
 neque id aliunde sine maximis inpensis, ac non nisi longissi- 
 mis ac difficillimis itineribus convehi potest. Deinde, quod 
 maxime omnium ad rem pertinet, convellenda erat eorum 
 hseresis, qui negabant, sub utraque specie totum Christum 
 esse, sed corpus tantum exsangue sub panis, sanguinem autem 
 sub vini specie contineri asserebant. Ut igitur fidei catho- 
 licae veritas magis ante omnium oculos poneretur, sapientis- 
 simo consilio alterius speciei hoc est panis communio in- 
 ducta est. 
 
 Cf. Confut. A. C. p. 93 sq. ; Bellarmin. Sacr. euchar. iv. 
 2 02 8 ; Klee, Dogmat. iii. S. 1 8 5 ff. Many voices have 
 recently pleaded in the Romish Church for the restoration of 
 the cup. Schmid, Liturg, i. 274, says : It must not be sup- 
 pressed that the majority of sincere Catholics, who are capable 
 of a judgment on this point, heartily wish that the supreme 
 apostolical ruler of the Church would give back the use of 
 the cup to those who wish it. 
 
 II. GREEK AND PEOTESTANT. 
 
 Conf, ortJiod. p. 168 : 'H Be Koivwvia rov fivartjpiov rovrov 
 (rrjs ev^apio-rias) TrpeTrei va <yiverai Kal Kara ra &vo elSr] rov 
 aprov Kal rov otvow roaov OTTO rov$ jrvevfianKOv^, OGOV Kal 
 
 U7TO TOU5 KO<7[JMKOV<;. 
 
 Metroph. Critopul. Conf. p. 9 8 : Mere^ova-t Trdvres etcarepov 
 el'Sou? TWV ev Ty SeaTroTiKp rpaTrefy, rov re aprov 
 rov 7rori)piov, eKKKriGiaariKoi re teal \alKoi, avSpes Kal 
 
 Cf. also Jerem. in Actis Wirtcmb. p. 129. 
 
 C. A. p. 21 : Laicis datur utraque species sacramenti in 
 coenS, domini, quia hie nios habet mandatum domini Matth. 
 xxvi. 27. Bibite ex hoc omnes. 
 
 ApoL C. A. p. 233 : Non potest dubitari, quin pium sit et 
 consentaneum institution! Christi et verbis Pauli, uti utraque 
 parte in coena domini. Christus enim instituit utramque partem, 
 et instituit, non pro parte ecclesise, sed pro tota ecclesia. 
 
 Art. Sm. p. 330 : Non tantum unam speciem esse dandam 
 sentimus. . . . Etsi enim verum esse possit, quod sub 
 
 T
 
 '290 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 tantum sit, quantum sub utraque, tamen una species non est 
 tota ordinatio et institutio per Ch. facta. 
 
 F. G. p. 602 : Eejicimus sacrilegium, quo laicis una tantum 
 pars sacramenti datur, cum nimirum contra expressa verba 
 testamenti Christi calice illis interdicitur atque ita sanguine 
 Christi spoliantur. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 2 1 : Improbamus illos, qui alteram 
 speciem, poculum inquam domini, fidelibus subtraxerunt. 
 Graviter enim peccant contra institutionem domini 
 
 Conf. Angl. p. 94 : (Agnoscimus), populo ad sacram com- 
 munionem accedenti utramque partem eucharistise tradendam 
 esse. Id enim et Christum jussisse et apostolos ubique ter- 
 rarum instituisse, et omnes veteres patres et catholicos epis- 
 copos secutos esse : et si quis contra faciat, eum, ut Gelasius 
 ait, committere sacrilegium. 
 
 Thirty-nine Arlt. art. xxx. : The cup of the Lord is not to 
 be denied to the lay-people : for both the parts of the Lord's 
 sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to 
 be ministered to all Christian men alike. 
 
 Conf. Scot. art. 2 2 : Pontificii . . . suffurando a populo pocu- 
 lum illud benedictionis horrendum sacrilegium commiserunt. 
 
 S. also Declar. Thorun. p. 64. 
 
 Observation. 
 Infant Communion; Unleavened Bread ; Water mingled with the Wine. 
 
 Differences of less importance concern the following points : 1. The 
 communion of children, which only the Greek Church permits, all 
 others rejecting it. 2. The use of leavened or unleavened bread, the 
 former being customary in the Greek, and the latter in the Romish 
 and the Lutheran. 3. The use of wine mixed with water or unmixed: 
 the former is preferred by the Roman and Greek, the latter by the 
 Protestant Churches. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL REFERENCES. 
 I. GREEK. 
 
 (a) Metroph. Critopul Conf. p. 98: Kal avra ra (3pe(f3r) 
 apf-dpeva cvdvs OTTO rov aryiov ySaTTT/ay^aTO? /uere^et TOW \OLTTOV 
 ol yoveis POV\OVTCU.
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 291 
 
 Cf. Jerem. in Act. Wirtemb. p. 89. 
 
 (b and c) Conf. orthod. p. 166 : 'H irpeTrovfievi) v\t], tfyovv 
 
 V%V/jLO<> . . . KOL OtJ/09 CI/U/CT09 . . ., KOi 49 TT)V 
 
 rjv ey^elrai, KOI vBcop. 
 
 Metroph. Critopul. Conf. p. 90: e H V\TJ . . . etrrl apros 
 $v%yftoy Kal /cpafjia, rovrecmv dlvo? vSart KeKpafj^jievo^. Cf. p. 98. 
 
 Jerem. in Actis Wirtemb. p. 129 : OVK ev dv/4&> aX\' eV 
 aprat ev%vjj,q> ru> rov aprov eiSei ^pcofj^eda. Cf. p. 86. 
 
 II. EOMISH. 
 
 (a) Oat. Rom. ii. 4. 62 : Quamvis haec lex del et ecclesise 
 auctoritate sancita ad omnes fideles pertineat, docendum est, 
 eos tamen excipi, qui nondum rationis usum propter setatis 
 imbecillitatem habent. Hi enim neque sacram eucharistiam 
 a communi et profano pane sciunt discernere, neque ad earn 
 accipiendam pietatem animi et religionem afferre possunt. 
 Atque id etiam a Christi institutione alienissimum videtur. 
 
 (b and c) Ib. ii. 4. 1 3 : Quemadmodum nullus panis nisi 
 triticeus apta sacramenti materia putandus est, (hoc enim 
 apostolica traditio nos docuit et ecclesia3 catholicae auctoritas 
 firmavit), ita etiam ex iis, quse Christus gessit, azymum esse 
 debere, facile intelligitur. 14 : Neque tamen ea qualitas adeo 
 necessaria existimanda est, tit, si ilia pani desit, sacramentum 
 confici non possit. 
 
 II. ii. 4. 15: (Altera sacramenti materia) est vinum ex 
 vitis fructu expression, cui modicum aquze pennixtum sit. 
 Nam dominum salvatprem vino in hujus sacramenti insti- 
 tutions usum esse cet. Cf. Trid. sess. xxii. cap. 7. S. Klee, 
 DogmM. iii. S. 190ff. 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 The Protestant symbols contain no express declarations on 
 these points, which is easily to be explained. The practice of 
 the Church, however, is plain enough.
 
 292 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 FIFTH POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 It is peculiar to the Greek and Eoman Churches to regard 
 the Eucharist not merely as a sacrament, but at the same time 
 as a true sacrifice (especially a sacrificium propitiatoriuin). 
 They believe, namely, that the same Christ who once offered 
 Himself to God for mankind in a bloody oblation on the cross, 
 is continually offered in an unbloody oblation by the hand of 
 the priest, for the living and the dead, the present and the 
 absent, for the expiation of sin. The solemn rite, adorned 
 with a multitude of ceremonies, by w T hich the priest accom- 
 plishes the unbloody sacrifice on the altar, is called the mass, 
 or missa. No part of the Eoman Catholic faith has been so 
 vehemently assaulted as this ; and in the symbols of both 
 Protestant Churches the mass is rejected in the most decided 
 manner, and sometimes with expressions of abhorrence. 
 
 Observation. 
 
 How the two aspects under which the Eucharist may be viewed on 
 this theory are to be united, the Council of Trent does not say ; but 
 it is the idea of the personal presence of Christ, and the transub- 
 stantiation which lies at the basis of it, which unites sacrament and 
 sacrifice. That is to say, the Christ made present through the con- 
 secration is not merely partaken of by the communicants, with which 
 participation, according to the Protestants, the sacrament ends, but 
 at the same time is as a sacrifice ever anew offered to God, a sacri- 
 fice, that is, which He in His collective work ever is. It is of no 
 importance that the two are separated in the sessions of Trent ; 
 the Catechism and all Roman theologians treat the Eucharist in one 
 section, first as sacrament, then as sacrifice. The mutual relation 
 between the two is thus defined by the Cat. Rom. ii. 4. 71 : Sacr. 
 consecratione perficitur, omnis vero sacrificii vis in eo est, ut offeratur. 
 Quare sacra euchar., dum in pyxide continetur vel ad aegrotum de- 
 fertur, sacramenti, non sacrificii rationem habet. Deinde etiam ut 
 sacramentum est, iis, qui div. hostiam sumunt, meriti causam affert 
 et omnes illas utilitates, quse commemorates sunt ; ut autem sacrific. 
 est, non merendi solum sed satisfaciendi quoque efficientiam continet. 
 The celebration at the altar is always sacrament and sacrifice at 
 once ; but the communion may be separated from the sacrifice, as for 
 the sick.
 
 THE LORD'S SUPPER. 293 
 
 L SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. ROMISH AND GREEK SYMBOLS. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxii. cap. 1 : Dominus noster, etsi semel se 
 ipsum in ara cmcis deo patri oblaturus erat, ut seternam illia 
 redemtionem operaretur, quia tamen per mortem sacerdotium 
 ejus exstinguendum non erat, in ccena novissima", ut suse 
 ecclesiae visibile, sicut hominum naturae exigit, relinqueret 
 sacrificium, quo cruentum illud semel in cruce peragendum 
 reprsesentaretur ej usque memoria in finem usque sseculi per- 
 maneret atque illius salutaris virtus in remissionem eorum, 
 quse a nobis quotidie committuntur, peccatorum 1 applicaretur, 
 . . . corpus et sanguinem suum sub speciebus panis et vini 
 deo patri obtulit ac sub earundem rerum symbolis apostolis, 
 quos tune N. T. sacerdotes constituebat, ut sumerent, tradidit 
 et iisdem eorumque in sacerdotio successoribus, ut offerrent, 
 prcecepit. 
 
 Ib. cap. 2 : Quoniam in divino hoc sacrificio, quod in missa 
 peragitur, idem ille Christus continetur et incruente immolatur, 
 qui in ara cmcis semel se ipsum cruente obtulit, docet synodus, 
 sacrificium istud vere propitiatorium esse per ipsumque fieri, 
 ut, si cum vero corde et recta fide, cum metu et reverentia, 
 contriti ac pcenitentes ad deum accedamus, misericordiam con- 
 sequamur et gratiam inveniamus in auxilio opportune. Hujus 
 quippe oblatione placatus dominus gratiam et donum poeni- 
 tentise concedens, crimina et peccata, etiam ingentia, dirnittit ; 
 una enim eademque est hostia, idem nunc offerens sacerdotum 
 ministerio, qui seipsum tune in cruce obtulit, sola offerendi 
 ratione di versa. Cujus quidem oblationis cruentse, inquam, 
 fructus per hanc incruentam uberrime percipiuntur : tantum 
 abest, ut illi per hanc quovis modo derogetur. Quare non 
 solum pro fidelium vivorum peccatis, pcenis, satisfactionibus et 
 aliis necessitatibus, sed et pro defunctis in Christo nondum ad 
 plenum purgatis, rite juxta apostolorum traditionem offertur. 
 
 Ib. can. 1 : Si quis dixerit, in missa non offerri deo verum 
 et proprium sacrificium, aut quod offerri non sit aliud, quam 
 nobis Christum ad manducandum dari, anathema sit. Can. 3 : 
 1 Cf. A. C. p. 25.
 
 294 CONFESSIONS OF CHEISTENDOM. 
 
 Si quis dixerit, missae sacrificimn tantum esse laudis et grati- 
 arum actionis, aut nudam commemorationem sacrificii in cruce 
 peracti, non autem propitiatorium, vel soli prodesse sumenti, 
 neque pro vivis et defunctis, pro peccatis, pcenis, satisfac- 
 tionibus et aliis necessitatibus offerri debere, anathema sit. 
 
 For clearer view of the virtue and operation of the mass, 
 we select from Bellarmine (Controv. de euchar. v. 6) : Sacrif. 
 missse non habet vim ex opere operate ad modum sacramen- 
 tomm. Non operatur sacrificium efficienter et immediate, 
 neque est proprie instrumentum dei ad justificandum. Non 
 immediate justificat, ut baptismus et absolutio faciunt, sed 
 donum pcenitentise impetrat, per quod homo peccator ad 
 sacramentum accedere velit et perillud justificetur. . . . Non 
 majorem vim habere potest sacrif. missae quam sacrificium 
 crucis ; . . sacrif. autem crucis non efficienter et immediate 
 justificavit, sed tantum impetratorie et meritorie, alioqui omnes 
 homines continuo justi effecti essent, cum dom. pro omnibus 
 hominibus se deo in sacrificium obtulerit. . . . Sacrif. missse 
 vim habet per modum impetrationis et ejus propria efficientia 
 est impetrare. Sacrif. crucis fuit meritorium, satisfactorium 
 et impetratorium vere et proprie, quia Ch. tune mortalis erat 
 et mereri ac satisfacere poterat ; sacrif. missa3 proprie solum 
 est impetratorium, quia Ch. nunc immortalis nee mereri nee 
 satisfacere potest. Cum autem dicitur propitiatorium vel- 
 satisfactorium, id est intelligendum ratione rei, quas impe- 
 tratur. Dicitur enim propitiatorium, quia impetrat remis- 
 sionem culpae, satisfactorium, quia impetrat remissionem pcence, 
 meritorium, quia impetrat gratiam benefaciendi ac merita ac- 
 quirendi Quanquam non negaverim, dici etiam satisfac- 
 torium, quod ex Christi institutione per sacrificium hoc 
 applicetur ejusdem Christi passio ad pcenas tollendas seu 
 viventium seu mortuorum, quae post culpam remissam ali- 
 quando remanent, vel in hac vita vel in purgatorio luendae. 
 Valor sacrificii missse finitus est. Haec est communis sententia 
 theologorum et probatur apertissime ex usu ecclesiae. Nam si 
 missse valor infinitus esset, frustra multee missae praesertim ad 
 rem eandem impetrandam offerrentur. Si enim una infiniti 
 valoris est, certe ad omnia impetranda sufficiet, quorsum igitur 
 aliae ? Et confirmatur ex sacrificio crucis, quod non alia de
 
 THE LOKD'S SUPPEK. 295 
 
 causS, unum tantum fait neque unquam repetitur, nisi quia 
 illud unum infiniti valoris fuit et pretium acquisivit pro 
 omnibus peccatis praeteritis et futuris remittendis. Etiamsi 
 posset Ch. per unam oblationem sacrificii incruenti sive per 
 se sive per ministrmn oblati quselibet a deo et pro quibus- 
 cunque impetrare, tamen noluit petere nee impetrare, nisi ut 
 pro singulis oblationibus applicaretur certa mensura fructus 
 passionis suee sive ad peccatorum remissionem sive ad alia 
 beneficia, quibus in hac vita indigenms. Cur autem id voluerit, 
 non est nostrum curiosius inquirere. Sacrificium missse non 
 solum impetratorium est spiritualium beneficiorum, sed etiam 
 temporalium, ed idcirco offerri potest pro peccatis, pro pcenis 
 et pro quibuscunque aliis necessitatibus. 
 
 Conf. ortlwd. p. 165: The Eucharist is called avaipuKro^ 
 Ovcria, p. 170, and among its tcapTrols are reckoned: To 
 fAVcrTripiov TOVTO TTpocr^epeTat Ovaia vTrep Trdvrwv T<OV 6p0o- 
 B6^a>i> xpto'Tiav&v %a)vra>v re /cal KKoifMjfj,ev<ov CTT' eXTTt'St 
 avaarda-ea)<; ^iw^9 alwviow 17 OTTO/O. Ovcria Sev 6e\et reXetcu? B9 
 rfjs TeXevraias Kpicrea)?. To BevTepov /cepSo? OTTOV pev SiSg 
 elvat, Siari TO /j,v(TTr)piov TOVTO ^Lverai t\ao-/z.o9 KOL Ka\oainn]iJia 
 TOV 0eov Sia ra9 dftapTias rjp&v CITE QAVTWV eiTe KOL 
 
 Jerem. in Ad. Wirtemb. p. 104 : AITTWS d<yid%ovaa <patveTat 
 7; Beta Te\Tij (ev^apiaTLO)' eva ftev Tpoirov TTJ 
 TrpoafapofAeva <yap TO, S&pa avTa> TQ> Trpoa-ffrepeo-da 
 roi9 TrpoatyepovTas /cat vTrep &v Trpoafjjepovo-t, KOI i\eov aurot9 
 TOV Qeov eTepov Be TTJ ^teraX^i/ret cet. TOVTCOV T&V 
 6 fiat 7rpwT09 KOIVOS ytveTai ^faffi fcal TeQwjfcocri, icai yap 
 dp(f)OTepQ)v TWV fiep&v rj Ovaria Trpocr^eperat. Of. also p. 
 97 sq. 
 
 Dosithei Conf. c. 17: IIia-Tevof^ev, elvai 6v<riav d 
 i\a<TTiKr)v TrpocrfapofjLevijv virep irdvTQJV TWV evaefitov 
 Te6v(aT03v Kal VTrep (i)(pe\eia<> irdvTWV cet. 
 
 See also Heinecc. Abbild. ii. 296 : The practice of the 
 Greek orthodox Church is distinguished from that of the 
 Eomish by this, that the former duly celebrates the office 
 only once in the same church, and accordingly tolerates in 
 every church only one altar ; Metrop. Critop. Conf. c. ix. p. 102. 
 On Eomish principles, masses may be said on the several altars
 
 296 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 of one church from dawn to mid-day. Vid. Schmid, Liturgik, 
 i 263. 
 
 From the idea of the mass as a sacrifice, it is easily ex- 
 plained how in the Eoman Catholic Church private masses 
 (missce privatce, but vid. Cat. Bom. ii 4. 79), at which no com- 
 municant is present, may he held. Trid. sess. xxii. can. 8 : 
 Si quis dixerit, missas, in quibus solus sacerdos sacramentaliter 
 communicat, illicitas esse adeoque abrogandas, a. s. The masses 
 for the dead, missse pro defunctis, are yet to be mentioned ; 
 they are connected with the doctrine of Purgatory, and will 
 be treated hereafter. 
 
 The Council of Trent did not approve of masses in the ver- 
 nacular. Sess. xxii cap. 8 : Etsi missa magnam contineat 
 populi fidelis eruditionem, non tamen expedire visum est 
 patribus, ut vulgari passim lingua celebraretur. Against this 
 use of a foreign tongue in divine service protests were uttered 
 by Apol. A. C. p. 250 ; Helv. ii cap. 22 ; Thirty-nine Artt. 
 art. xxiv. 
 
 II. PnOTESTANT. 
 
 ^The references in the Protestant and Socinian symbols to 
 the mass, and remonstrances against it, are very diffuse, and 
 cannot therefore be cited in full Cf. A. 0. p. 23 ; Art. Smalc. 
 305 ; F. C. p. 602 ; Conf. Helv. ii 21 ; Eng. Artt. art xxxi.
 
 XVII. 
 
 PENANCE. 
 
 DIVERGENCE. 
 
 THE Sacrament of Penance corresponds with that of Baptism, 
 inasmuch as the baptized, having lost by sin his justification, 
 can regain it only by means of penance. Romanists and Pro- 
 testants are at one on this, that the sinner must experience 
 deep repentance on account of his sins, and exhibit it before 
 God, if he would be a partaker of forgiveness through Christ, 
 and therefore of a renewed justification. But they part 
 asunder at this point. 1. Protestants hold penitence to be 
 a matter purely internal, and any verbal confession to a human 
 minister as non-essential. The Romanists and Greeks, on the 
 contrary, regard this confession of sin, confessio oris, as an essen- 
 tial element, the second part in repentance. 2. Protestants 
 teach that the forgiveness of such a penitent sinner is perfect 
 at once for Christ's sake ; they require no contribution of the 
 sinner's own. The Romanists and Greeks, on the contrary, 
 require for the removal of the temporal punishments of sin 
 personal satisfactioncs of the absolved, holding that these con- 
 stitute the third element in repentance. 3. The Romanists 
 and Greeks regard repentance, thus viewed, and connected 
 with priestly absolution, as a sacrament. The Protestants deny 
 this altogether. 
 
 Although the evangelical Church holds confession not to be 
 a law of Christ, and therefore not as essentially necessary, it 
 has nevertheless retained it as a permanent institute, mainly 
 on account of its connection with absolution. As such, it is 
 
 20;
 
 298 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 always the preparation of the Lord's Supper. 1 (The Reformed 
 Church, it is true, avows that common confession of sins in the 
 congregation is sufficient ; but it permits, and for some cases 
 of special need enjoins, a private confession to the minister as 
 the means of consolation and instruction.) The evangelical 
 Church is distinguished from the Eoman and Greek by this, 
 that it regards a confession of sin in the general by the peni- 
 tent as sufficient ; 2 on the contrary, the latter require a specific 
 detail of all mortal sins, so far as the penitent can remember 
 them, with their essential circumstances (confessw auricularis). 
 With their principle, that the priest is in the place of a judge 
 appointed by God for the penitent, Protestantism cannot be 
 reconciled, especially as it knows nothing of satisfaction that 
 might be imposed. The confessor is the servant or organ of 
 God, the announcer of divine mercy : his absolution flows from 
 the power of the keys entrusted to him. (No. XX.) 
 
 a. Repentance, and the Sacrament of Penance generally ; and 
 Satisfactions in particular. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. ROMAN AND GREEK 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiv. poenit. cap. 3 : Sunt quasi materia 
 hujus sacramenti (pcenitentise) ipsius pcenitentis actus, nempe 
 contritio, confessio et satisfactio. Qui, quatenus in prenitente 
 ad integritatem sacramenti ad plenamque et perfectam pecca- 
 torum remissionem ex dei institutione requiruntur, hac ratione 
 pcenitentiae partes dicuntur. 
 
 Tb. can. 4 : Si quis negaverit, ad integram et perfectam 
 
 1 A. C. p. 27 ; Conf. Sax. p. 73. Confession was, down to the middle of the 
 past century, merely a private confession, the individual went alone to his 
 minister. Latterly, however, the public and general confession has been intro- 
 duced, and almost entirely superseded the former. That private confession was 
 an efficacious means of furthering piety in individuals, especially in the hands of 
 intelligent ministers, is generally acknowledged. Many even of the Reformed 
 theologians have expressed a wish that it could be introduced into their churches. 
 
 2 In case any man desired to confess his individual sins, the Church, in its 
 earlier regulations at least, by no means prohibited this.
 
 PENANCE. 299 
 
 peccatorum remissionem requiri tres actus in pcenitente, quasi 
 materiam sacramenti pcenitentiae, videlicet contritionem, con- 
 fessionem et satisfactionem, quee tres poenitentise partes dicun- 
 tur ; aut dixerit, duas tantum esse pcenitentiae partes, terrores 
 scilicet incussos conscientiaa agnito peccato, et fidem concep- 
 tam ex evangelic vel absolutione, qua credit quis sibi per 
 Christum remissa peccata : anathema sit. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 5. 21 : Est hujus sacramenti (pcenitentise) 
 proprium, ut prseter formam et materiam, quse omnibus sacra- 
 mentis commuma sunt, partes etiam illas habeat, quse tanquam 
 totam integramque pcenitentiam constituant, contritionem scili- 
 cet, confessionem et satisfactionem. . . . Has autem partes ex 
 earum partium genere esse dicuntur, quaa ad aliquod totum 
 constituendum necessaries sunt, quoniam, quemadmodum homi- 
 nis corpus ex pluribus membris constat, manibus, pedibus, 
 oculis et aliis hujusmodi. partibus, quarum aliqua si desit, 
 merito imperfectum videatur, perfectum vero, si nulla deside- 
 retur ; eodem etiam modo poenitentia ex hisce tribus partibus 
 ita constituitur, ut, quamvis, quod ad ejus naturam attinet, con- 
 tritio et confessio, quibus homo Justus fit, satis sit, tamen nisi 
 tertia etiam pars, id est, satisfactio accedat, aliquid ei omnino 
 ad perfectionem desit necesse sit. Quare adeo hse partes inter 
 se connexse sunt, ut contritio confitendi et satisfaciendi con- 
 silium et propositum inclusum habeat, confessionem contritio 
 et satisfaciendi voluntas, satisfactionem vero duse reliquae ante- 
 cedant. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sessio xiv. pcenit. can. 1 : Si quis dixerit, in 
 catholica ecclesia posnitentiam non esse vere et proprie sacra- 
 mentum pro fidelibus, quoties post baptismum in peccata la- 
 buntur, ipsi deo reconciliandis a Christo institutum, anathema 
 sit. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 178: To 7re//,7TToi/ pvarripiov elvai vj p,era- 
 voia, rj oTrola elvai era? TTOZ/O? TT}? KapBias Sia ra afutpnjftaTa 
 OTTOV ea~<j)a\v 6 avdpwjros, ra OTroia Karrj^opa epsirpoadev TOV 
 fie <yv(t)/j,r)v {3e(3alav va Biopdtaa-r) rrjv tyorjv TOV et9 TO 
 y, Kai, /ie ^.niQv^iav va reXeKacrrj o, n- rbv eTnTifiijaec 6 
 o Trvev/LLarticos TOV TOVTO TO (Mvcnripiov la-^vet ical Trepvei 
 
 TT)V Bvva/JiLV TOV, OTfQTOV T) Xv<7l5 TWV afJLapTl&V <yiVTat, Sia TOV 
 
 iepea)$, Kara TrjV TCL%IV real fyvydeiav T^5 e/c/cX^o-tas* OTTQV jrapev-
 
 300 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Bus a>9 av Trdprj rrjv crv^f-^wpria'iv rov, dtyecwrat ra afj,aprr)fj,ara 
 rijv wpav eiceivrjv o\a uiro rov @eov Sia rov iepews. 
 
 Ib. p. 179 sq. : Elvai dvcvynalav va %$ aWTptftijv /fapSta? o 
 peravowv Kol \VTTIJV 8ia ra dpaprripard rov. t? rrjv avv- 
 rpi/Srjv rovrrjv rfjs KapSias TrpeTrei va a,KO\ov6a Kal rj Sia trro- 
 fiaros eofAO\6 i yi]a'i i s irdvru>v r&v d^iaprriiJLdrwv icaff fieaWTOK . . . 
 To rpirov fj^epof rrjs yaeravo/a? TrpeVet va elvai o icavovas /cot TO 
 eTTirtfJuov cet. 
 
 ConciL Trid. sess. xiv. pcenit. cap. 8 : Quoad satisfactionem 
 (quse ex omnibus pcenitentise partibus, quemadmodum a patri- 
 bus nostris christiano populo fuit perpetuo tempore commen- 
 data, ita una, maxime nostra setate, summo pietatis prsetextu 
 impugnatur ab iis, qui speciem pietatis habent, virtutem autem 
 ejus abnegarunt) synodus declarat, falsum omnino esse et a 
 verbo dei alienum, culpam a domino nunquam remitti quin 
 universa etiam poena condonetur. . . . Sane et divinae justitice 
 ratio exigere videtur, ut aliter ab eo in gratiam recipiantur, 
 qui ante baptismum per ignorantiam deliquerint, aliter vero, 
 qui semel a peccati et daemonis servitute liberati et accepto 
 Spiritus sancti dono, scientes templum dei violare et Spiritum 
 sanctum contristare non formidaverint. Et divinam clemen- 
 tiam decet, ne ita nobis absque ulla satisfactione peccata 
 dimittantur, ut occasione accepta, peccata leviora putantes, 
 velut injurii et contumeliosi Spiritui sancto in graviora laba- 
 mur, thesaurizantes nobis iram in die me. Procul dubio enim 
 magnopere a peccato revocant et quasi freno quodam coercent 
 ha3 satisfactorise pcense cautioresque et vigil antiores in futurum 
 poenitentes efficiunt: medentur quoque peccatorum reliquiis, 
 et vitiosos habitus male vivendo comparatos contrariis virtu- 
 turn actionibus tollunt. . . . Neque vero ita nostra est satis- 
 factio hsec, quam pro peccatis nostris exsolvimus, ut non sit 
 per Christum Jesum: nam qui ex nobis tanquam ex nobis 
 nihil possumus, eo co-operante, qui nos confortat, omnia pos- 
 sumus. Ita non habet homo unde glorietur, sed omnis gloria- 
 tio nostra in Christo est : in quo vivimus, in quo meremur, 
 in quo satisfacimus, facientes fructus dignos pcenitentioe ; qui 
 ex illo vim habent, ab illo offeruntur patri et per ilium ac- 
 ceptantur a patre. Debent ergo sacerdotes domini, quantum 
 epiritus et prudentia suggesserit, pro qualitate criminum et
 
 PENANCE. 301 
 
 poenitentium facilitate salutares et convenientes satisfactiones 
 injungere, ne, si forte peccatis conniveant et indulgentius 
 cum pcenitentibus agant, levissima qusedam opera pro gra- 
 vissimis delictis injungendo, alienorum peccatorum participes 
 efficiantur. 
 
 Hid. can. 13 : Si quis dixerit, pro peccatis quoad poenam 
 temporalem minime deo per Chr. merita satisfied posnis ab 
 eo inflictis et patienter toleratis vel a sacerdote injunctis sed 
 neque sponte susceptis, ut jejuniis, orationibus, eleemosynis 
 vel aliis etiam pietatis operibus, . . . anath. sit. Can. 14 : 
 Si quis dix., satisfactiones, quibus pcenitentes per Ch. Jes. 
 peccata redimunt, non esse cultus dei sed traditiones hominum, 
 doctrinam de gratia et verum dei cultum atque ipsum bene- 
 ficium mortis Ch. obscurantes, anathema sit. 
 
 Cf. Confut. A. C. p. 85 ; Cat. Rom. ii. 5. 62 sqq. 
 
 Conf. orihod. p. 181 : To rpLrov fiepos rfjs fieravolas irpi- 
 iret va elvai o reavovas /eat TO ejnrLpiov, oirov BiSy KCU Siopify 
 6 TrvevfjiaTiKO';, a>9 av elvai Trpoaev^al, eXetj^ocrvvai, vijcrreiai, 
 eTrlvKe-fyis cvyiaw roiraV) al >yovvK\icrlai, Kal ra oftota, OTTOV 
 OeXovai (f)avt dpfioSia et? rrjv Kpiaiv rov TrvevfjiariKov. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. cap. x. p. 105 : Elra Kal TTOIVIJ rt9 
 eTrdyerai rot? ptTavoovGi Trapa TWV d/cpoaa-a/Aevcov ra rovrcov 
 et? re cra3(j)povicrfji6v r ov ^Kef ardKTws ftiovv, Kal 'iva &ia T?}? 
 eKovcriov Kal TrpoaiperiKrjs ^Xti|rea)5 fAerpiuTepas TreipaOSxn, rrjg 
 TOV Qeov Trpo&Kaipov pdftSov. 
 
 II. PKOTESTANT. 
 
 C. A. p. 12 : Constat pcenitentia proprie his duabus parti- 
 bus : altera est contritio seu terrores incussi conscientise agnito 
 peccato; altera est fides, quse concipitur ex evangelic seu 
 absolutione, et credit propter Christum remitti peccata, et con- 
 solatur conscientiam, et ex terroribus liberat. 
 
 A. Srn. p. 321 : Pcenitentise adjungtmt tres partes, contri- 
 tionem, confessionem et satisfactionem, addita grandi consola- 
 tione et pollicitatione remissionis peccatorum, meriti, expiationis 
 peccatorum ac plenariae redemtionis coram deo, si homo vere 
 doleat, confiteatur et satisfaciat. Sic in pcenitentia homo ad 
 fiduciam propriorum operum ducitur. Hinc orta est vox, quee
 
 302 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 in suggestis, cum praelegeretur vulgo publica absolutio, usur- 
 pata fuit : Prolonga deus vitam meam, donee pro meis peccatis 
 satisfecero et vitam meam emendavero. 
 
 Conf. Hdv. ii cap. 14 : Per poenitentiam intelligimus men- 
 tis in homine p'eccatore resipiscentiam, verbo evangelii et 
 Spiritu sancto excitatam fideque veraV acceptam, qua protinus 
 homo peccator agnatam sibi corruptionem peccataque omnia 
 sua, per verbum dei accusata, agnoscit ac de his ex corde 
 dolet, eademque coram deo non tantum deplorat et fatetur 
 ingenue cum pudore, sed etiam cum indignatione exsecratur, 
 cogitans jam sedulo de emendatione et perpetuo innocentiae 
 virtutumque studio, in quo sese omnibus diebus vitae reliquis 
 sancte exerceat. Et hsec quidem est vera pcenitentia, sincera 
 nimirum ad deum et omne bonum conversio, sedula vero a 
 diabolo et ab omni malo aversio. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 163 : Tertius actus (pcenitentiae) de satisfac- 
 tionibus. Hie vero habet confusissimas disputationes. Fin- 
 gunt seternas pcenas mutari in pcenas purgatorii et harum 
 pattern remitti potestate clavium, partem docent redimendam 
 esse satisfactionibus. Addunt amplius, quod oporteat satis- 
 factiones esse opera supererogationis et haec constituunt in 
 stultissimis observationibus, velut in peregrinationibus, rosariis 
 aut sim. observationibus, quae non habent mandata dei. . . . 
 Inter haec scandala et doctrinas daemoniorum jacet obruta doc- 
 trina de justitia fidei in Chr. et de beueficio Christi cet. 
 
 Ib. p. 184: Nunc more (ecclesiae vet.) antiquato manet 
 nomen satisfactionis et vestigium moris, quod in confessione 
 praescribuntur certae satisfactiones, quas definiunt esse opera 
 non debita, rios vocamus satisfactiones canonicas. De his sic 
 sentimus sicut de enumeratione, quod satisfactiones can. non 
 sint necessariae jure divino ad remissionem peccatorum. . . . 
 Retinenda est enim sententia de fide, quod fide consequamur 
 remissionem peccatorum propter Chr., non propter nostra opera 
 praecedentia aut sequentia. 
 
 Ib. p. 189 : Cum scripturae non dicant, quod operibus non 
 debitis pcenas aetemas compensandas sint, temere amrmant 
 adversarii, quod per satisfactiones canonicas poenae illae com- 
 pensentur, nee habent claves mandatum poenas aliquas com- 
 mutandi, item partem pcenamm remittendi.
 
 PENANCE. 303 
 
 Gf. Conf. Saxon, p. 77 sqq. ; Conf. Wirtemb. p. Ill sq<|. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 14: Improbamus illos, qui suis satisfac- 
 tionibus existimant se pro commissis satisfacere peccatis. Nam 
 doce"mus, Christum unum morte vel passione sua esse omnium 
 peccatorum satisfactionem, propitiationem vel expiationem : 
 interim tamen, quod et ante diximus, mortificationem carnis 
 urgere non desinimus ; addimus tamen, hanc non obtrudendam 
 esse deo superbe pro peccatorum satisfactione, sed prsestandam 
 humiliter, pro ingenio filiorum dei. 
 
 Cf. Dedar. Tkorun. p. 65 sq. 
 
 6. Confession and Absolution. 
 
 I. EOMAN AND GREEK. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiv. pcenit. cap. 5 : Colligitur, opertere a 
 poenitentibus omnia peccata mortalia, quorum post diligentem 
 sui discussionem conscientiam habent, in confessione recenseri, 
 etiamsi occultissima ilia sint; . . . nam venialia, quanquam 
 recte et utiliter citraque omnem prsesumtionem in confessione 
 dicantur, taceri tamen citra culpam multisque aliis remediis ex- 
 piari possunt. . . . Itaque dum omnia, quse' memorise occurrunt 
 peccata, Christi fideles confiteri student, procul dubio omnia 
 divinse misericordise agnoscenda exponunt. Qui vero secus 
 faciunt et scienter aliqua retinent, nihil divinaa bonitati per 
 sacerdotem remittendum proponunt. . . . Colligitur praeterea, 
 etiam eas circumstantias in confessione explicandas esse, quse 
 speciem peccati mutant, quod sine illis peeeata ipsa neque a 
 poenitentibus integre exponantur nee judicibus innotescant, 
 et fieri nequeat, ut de gravitate criminum recte censere 
 possint et pcenam, quam oportet, pro illis poenitentibus im- 
 ponere. 
 
 Ib. can. 6 : Si quis negaverit, confessionem sacramentalem 
 vel institutam vel ad salutem necessariam esse jure divino, 
 aut dixerit, modum secrete confitendi soli sacerdoti . . . alie- 
 num esse ab institutione et mandato Ch. et inventum esse 
 humanum, anathema sit. Can. 7 : Si quis dixerit, in sacra- 
 mento poenitentias ad remissionem peccatorum necessarium 
 non esse jure divino, confiteri omnia et singula peccata mor-
 
 304 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 talia, quorum memorial cum debita et diligent! praemeditatione 
 habeatur, etiam occulta . . . et circumstantias, quse peccati 
 speciem mutant, . . . aut demum non licere confiteri peccata 
 venialia, anathema sit Can. 8 : Si quis dixerit, confessionem 
 omnium peccatorum, qualem ecclesia servat, esse impossibilem 
 et traditionem humanam a piis abolendam, aut ad earn non 
 teneri omnes et singulos utriusque sexus Ch. fideles semel in 
 anno cet, anathema sit. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 180 : Eis rrjv awrpifirjv TT)? /ca/3oYa<? TrpeVet 
 va aKQ\ov6a ical rj Sia (rrofmros ^0/10X07770-49 Trdvrcav rwv 
 dfiaprtjfjLdrasv tcaff cicacrrov' Start Bev rjinropel o TrvevfjLariKos 
 
 VO, \V(TT) T17TOT69, O.V &V ^Vpr) rrola TTpeTTCt VO, \vdoV(Tl. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. p. 107: 'Epurwa-i, /j,ev ol aKpoaral 
 rrjs riav afjUtpTrj/jLarcov e^o/j.o\oy^cra)^ tear etSo? TO, afiapTJ]- 
 fiara /cal rrjv TOVTW -rroLOTtjra, 'iva TO Trpocrfopov (f)dpfj,aicov 
 7rdf;(i)(ri raj voaovvri' eirei teat iarpos OVK uv Gepcnrevcreiev 
 v6a"rjfjia, /j,rj Karavoricra<; irporepov TO irotov TOV 
 ov JJL-TIV te Kai TO, irpocrtoTra, /J,eff tav r) dfj^apria 
 TOV re rpcnrov Kal TOTTOV Trepirrov yap rouro, KOI 
 \iav Trovrjpav vTr6\r^ft,v T&> TroXvTrpaynovovvrt Kal 
 
 Cf. Jerem. in Act. Wirterrib. p. 87 ; Plato, Catcch. p. 132. 
 Auricular confession is iw<rri)piaK.r} e^o/jLoXoyrja-^ (Dosithei 
 Conf. c. 15). 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiv. pcenit. cap. G : Quamvis absolutio 
 sacerdotis alieni beneficii sit dispensatio, tamen non est solum 
 nudum ministerium vel annuntiandi evangelium, vel decla- 
 randi remissa esse peccata, sed ad instar actus judicialis, quo 
 ab ipso velut a judice sententia pronuntiatur. C can. 9. 
 
 IL PROTESTANT. 
 
 A. C. p. 12 : De confessione decent, quod absolutio privata 
 in ecclesiis retinenda sit, quanquam in confessione non sit 
 necessaria omnium delictorum enumeratio, est enim impossi- 
 bilis (Ps. xix. 13). P. 27: Docentur homines, ut absolu- 
 tionem plurimi faciant, quia sit vox dei et mandate dei 
 pronuntietur. 
 
 ApoL A. C. p. 163: Quantum negotii est in ilia infinite
 
 PENANCE. 305 
 
 enumeratione peccatorum, qure tamen magna" ex parte con- 
 sumitur in traditionibus humanis ! Et quo magis crucientuf 
 bonse mentes, fingunt hanc enumerationem esse juris divini. 
 P. 181: De enumeratione delictorum in confessione diximus, 
 quod sentiamus, earn non esse jure divino necessariam. Nam 
 quod objiciunt quidam, judicem prius debere cognoscere causam, 
 priusquam pronuntiat, hoc nihil ad hanc rem pertinet, quia 
 ministerium absolutionis beneficium est seu gratia, non est 
 judicium seu lex. P. 159: Etiamsi prodest rudes assue- 
 facere, ut quasdam (peccata) enumerent, ut doceri facilius 
 possint : verum disputamus nunc, quid sit necessarium jure 
 divino. 
 
 II. p. 167 : Potestas clavium administrat et exhibet evan- 
 gelium per absolutionem, quae est vera vox evangelii ; . . . et 
 quia deus vere per verbum vivificat, claves vere coram deo 
 remittunt peccata. Quare voci absolventis non secus ac voci 
 de ccelo sonanti credendum est. P. 181 : Irnpium esset, 
 ex ecclesia" privatam absolutionem tollere. Neque quid sit 
 remissio peccatorum aut potestas clavium intelligunt, si qui 
 privatam absolutionem aspernantur. 
 
 Art. Sm. p. 323: Confessio sic instituebatur, ut homines 
 juberentur omnia sua peccata enumerare (quod factu impos- 
 sibile est). Hsec ingens carnificina fuit. Et si quis quorun- 
 dam peccatorum oblitus esset, is eatenus absolvebatur, ut si 
 in memoriam ilia recurrerent, ea postea confiteretur. Nemo 
 igitur scire poterat, nurn unquam sufficienter, pure et recte 
 confessus esset et quando confessionis finis futurus esset. 
 
 76. p. 331 : Cum absolutio et virtus clavhun etiam sit con- 
 solatio et auxiliurn contra peccatum et malam conscientiam in 
 evangelio ab ipso Christo instituta, nequaquam in ecclesia 
 confessio et absolutio abolenda est, prsesertim propter teneras 
 et pavidas conscientias ; . . . enumeratio autem peccatorum 
 debet esse unicuique libera, quid, enumerare aut non enume- 
 rare velit. 
 
 Cf. also Cat. min. p. 378 ; Conf. Wirteml). p. Ill sq. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 14: Credimus, confessionem ingenuam, 
 quse soli deo fit vel privatim inter deum et peccatorem vel 
 palam in templo, ubi generalis ilia peccatorum confessio reci- 
 tatur, sufficere nee necessarium esse ad remissionem peccatorum 
 
 u
 
 306 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 consequendam, ut quis peccata sua confiteatur sacerdoti susur- 
 rando in aures ipsius, ut vicissim cum impositione manuum 
 ejus audiat ab ipso absolutionem. Si quis vero peccatorum 
 mole et tentationibus perplexis oppressus velifc consilium, in- 
 stitutionem et consolationem privatim vel a ministro ecclesice 
 aut aliquo fratre in lege dei docto petere, non improbamus, 
 quemadmodum et generalem et publicam illam in templo ac 
 ccetibus sacris recitari solitam peccatorum confessionem utpote 
 scripturis congruam maxime approbamus. Of. Conf, Tetrap. 
 art. 20 ; Declar. Thorun. p. 65. 
 
 Calvin, Institutt. cTirist. iii. 4. 12 : Duas privatae confes- 
 sionis formas scriptura probat. Unam, quae nostra" causa fiat, 
 quo pertinet illud Jacobi, ut alter alteri peccata confiteamur : 
 sentit enim, ut nostras infirmitates alter alteri detegentes, 
 consilio et consolatione muta nos juvemus ; alteram, quae in 
 promixi gratiam facienda est, ad ipsum placandum et nobis 
 reconciliandum, si qua in re nostro vitio Isesus fuerit. Ac in 
 priore quidem specie, tametsi Jacobus neminem nominatim 
 assignando, in cujus sinum nos exoneremus, liberum pennittit 
 delectum, ut ei confiteamur, qui ex ecclesiae grege maxime 
 idoneus fuerit visus. Quia tamen pastores prse aliis ut pluri- 
 mum judicandi sunt idonei, potissimum etiam nobis eligendi 
 erunt. Dico autem ideo pros aliis appositos, quod ipsa mysteiii 
 vocatione nobis a domino designantur, quorum ex ore erudiamur 
 ad subigenda et corrigenda peccata, turn consolationem ex venise 
 fiducia percipiamus. . . . Ergo id officii sui unusquisque 
 fidelium esse meminerit, si ita privatim angitur et afflictatur 
 peccatorum sensu, ut se explicare nisi alieno adjutorio nequeat, 
 non negligere, quod illi a domino offertur remedium, nempe ut 
 ad se sublevandum privata confessione apud suum pastorem 
 utatur, ac ad solatia sibi adhibenda privatam ejus operam im- 
 ploret, cujus officium est et publice et privatim populum dei 
 evangelica doctrinal consolarL Verum e^ moderatione semper 
 utendum est, ne, ubi deus niliil certum prsescribit, conscientiaa 
 certo jugo alligentur. Hinc sequitur, ejusmodi confessionem 
 liberam esse oportere, ut non ab omnibus exigatur, sed iis 
 tautum commendetur, qui eS, se opus habere intelligent. 
 Deinde ne hi ipsi, qui ilia utuntur pro su& necessitate, ad 
 enumeranda omnia peccata vel prsecepto aliquo cogantur vel
 
 PENANCE. 307 
 
 arte inducantur, sed quoad interesse sua putabunt, ut solidum 
 consolationis fructum referant. 1 
 
 Ibid. 1 4 : Non minoris (quam publica) efficacies ant fructus 
 est privata absolutio, ubi ab iis petitur, qui singulari remedio 
 ad infirmitatem suam sublevandam opus habent. Accidit 
 enim non raro, ut qui generates promissiones audit, quse ad 
 totam fidelium congregationem destinantur, maneat nihilomi- 
 nus in aliqua dubitatione, ac velut remissione nondum impe- 
 trata inquietum adhuc animum habeat. Idem si pastori suo 
 secretum animi vulnus aperuerit atque illam evangelii vocem 
 peculiariter ad se directam audierit : remittuntur tibi peccata 
 tua, confide, . . . animum confirmabit ad securitatem illaque 
 qu& prius eestuabat trepidatione liberabitur. S. Heidegger, Corp. 
 iheol. xxiii. 23. 
 
 Against Komish auricular confession, s. Conf. Angl. p. 97 ; 
 Conf. Scot. neg. p. 127; and Limborch, Theol. christ. v. 7 7. 
 9 sqq. 
 
 Penances. 
 
 The penances which are usually imposed on penitents in 
 the Roman Catholic Church are chiefly prayers, fastings, and 
 alms. Protestants are, of course, not indisposed to assign their 
 due importance to these performances, to prayer and charity 
 as Christian duties, and to fasting as a bodily discipline help- 
 ful to piety. But they attach no merit to these things. They 
 deny to them the character of making satisfaction, because 
 they hold personal satisfaction and personal expiation as 
 having no place in Christianity. 
 
 1 Zwingli Exposit. articular. (Opp. i. p. 405) : Confessio libera esse debet, nee 
 quisquam ad earn cogendus erit. Qui iiifirmi siint et imbecilles, hi adeant epis- 
 copum suum et pastorem, consilimn petant ant consolationem aut aliud, quo 
 egent. Qui finni sunt in fide et satis docti, sacerdote hac in parte nihil opus est 
 iis. Hac libertate pennissa non raro et finni accedent consulturi sacerdotem, 
 nam nemo tarn finnus est, qui non admonitione egeat. Venient autem sponte, 
 ut quum quis fratrem in rebus dubiis adit et aliquando etiam delictum fatetur 
 proximo cui fidit, quserens, qua peccatum effugiat (nam quisque suis in rebus 
 cjecus est), tit et rogans pro ipso deum precetur, ut peccatum remittat et 
 fidem augeat.
 
 308 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. EOMISH AND GREEK. 
 
 ConciL Trid. sess. xiv. de poenit. 13, s. above. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 5. 74 : Omne satisfactions genus pastores 
 docebunt ad hsec tria praecipue conferendum esse, orationem, 
 jejunium et eleemosynam, quse quidem tribus bonis animoe, 
 corporis et iis, quse externa commoda dicuntur, quse omnia a 
 deo accepimus, respondent. Nihil vero aptius et convenientius 
 ad exstirpandas omnium peccatorum radices esse potest. Nam 
 cum omne, quod est in mundo, concupiscentia carnis sit aut 
 concupiscentia oculorum aut superbia vitse, nemo non videt, 
 his tribus morbi causis totidem medicinas, priori scilicet jeju- 
 nium, alteri eleemosynam, tertiae orationem rectissime opponi. 
 
 (Bellarmin, Posnit. iv. 6 : Opera satisfactoria ex com muni 
 theologorum sententia sunt oratio, jejunium et eleemosyna ac 
 prseterea ilia omnia, quse ad haic tria tanquam ad qusedam 
 praecipua capita revocantur. Cur autem hsec tria praecipue 
 a theologis statuantur, duse sunt causse. Una est, quod debe- 
 amus satisfacere per ea bona, quae nostra sunt, quoad ejus 
 fieri potest. Habemus autem tria genera bonorum, animi, 
 quse deo damus per orationem, corporis, quse deo damus per 
 jejunium, externa, quse deo damus per eleemosynam. Altera 
 ratio est, quod omnia vitia revocantur ad ilia tria, concu- 
 piscentiam carnis, cone, oculorum et superbiam vitse. Jejunium 
 comprimit concupiscentiam carnis, eleemosyna concup. oculor. 
 i e. avaritiam, oratio superbiam vitae. 
 
 Id. Bon. oper. i. 3 : Tres sunt primarii fructus orationis, 
 satisfactio, meritum, impetratio. Ex quibus duos priores ad- 
 versarii funditus tollunt. Oratio sive impetret quod postulat 
 sive non impetret, semper est meritoria majoris gratise et 
 glorise, quando ab homine justo et sicut oportet funditur. 
 iL 6 : Jejunium generatim sumtum habet divinuni prsecep- 
 tum, quamvis in particular! ab ecclesia determinetur tempus 
 modusque jejunii C. 12: Jejunium utile est ad deum 
 colendum. Loquimur de abstinentia, quse ex electione assu- 
 mitur ad bonum aliquem finem, sic enim jejunium non est 
 res media sed actus virtutis. Jejunium est utile ad satis-
 
 PENANCE. 309 
 
 faciendum deo vel ad eum placandum. Hid. iii. 5 : Error 
 est hoereticorum, qui tametsi eleemosynas utiles esse non 
 negant, tamen negant eas ad merendam vitam seteraam aut ad 
 satisfaciendum pro peccatis aliquam vim habere.) 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 181, s. above. 
 
 75. p. 268 : 'Arro ras <yeviKas Kal egaiperovs rpels aperas 
 Troiai a\\cu <yevvovvrai ; at rpels avrcu, f] rrpo^ev^r]^ 77 
 
 On Fasting in particular, Conf. ortkod. p. 268 sq. : 17 
 vrja-reta, \oji^ofjLevr} Kara ra? ^pia-nava? apeTa9, etvat, fjiia 
 ey/cpaTeia UTTO o\a ra fa'yrjTa rj anro Kamoia . . ., o/ioia>9 Kal 
 O.TTO ra Trora Kal OTTO o\a TO, Trpajf^ara rov Koafjbov Kal airo 
 oXat? rat? eiriOvpiais rai? aai9, Bia va rjfATropf] 6 xpiffTiavos 
 va Kavt] Trjv vrpocrevxfjv rov fte rpoTrov evKoiXwrepov Kal va 
 iXacr/cerat Toy eov aKOfii Bia va veKpwvr} ra? r?}? crapKos 
 eTudv/Ltias Kal va aTroBe^erac TIJV ^dpiv rov eov. . . . 'H 
 vrjarela avrtj orav jlverat Kara TOV$ TrpocriJKovTas rpoirov^^ 
 KavL fieryaXov t'Xacr/ioy et? rov ebv &ia ra$ d/j,apria<; /^a9. Cf. 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. 18; Jerem. in Actis Wirtemb. p. 
 126 sq. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 As to fasting, the Protestant principles, so far as the symbols 
 refer to it, may be thus stated : 
 
 C. A. p. 31 : Decent, quod quilibet christianus debeat se 
 corporali disciplina aut corporalibus exercitiis et laboribus sic 
 exercere et coercere, ne saturitas aut desidia exstimulet ad 
 peccandum, non ut per ilia exercitia mereamur gratiam aut 
 satisfaciamus peccatis. . . . Itaque non damnantur ipsa jejunia, 
 sed traditiones, quse certos dies, certos cibos proescribunt cum 
 periculo conscientise, tanquam istiusmodi opera sint necessarius 
 cultus. Cf. Apol C. A. pp. 191, 209 sq. 
 
 Conf. Wirtcmb. p. 113 : De oratione, jejunio, eleemosyna et 
 aliis id genus operibus sentimus, ea diligentissime sectanda 
 esse, sed longe alium habere usum, quam quod vel meritis suis 
 satisfaciant deo pro peccatis nostris, vel applicent nobis meri- 
 tum Christi. 
 
 Ib. p. 114 : Jejunium sentimus utile esse non in hoc, ut
 
 310 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 vel opens sui merito expiet peccata coram deo, vel applicet 
 jejunanti meritum Christi, sed ut sobrietate injiciat carni 
 frenum cet. 
 
 76. p. 128 : Veteres jejunamnt aliquoties totis diebus, ut 
 vacarent publicae precationi et hac discipline admonerent ec- 
 clesiam suam ac prsesertim juventutem de prseteritis vel de 
 preesentibus vel de imminentibus periculis ac excitarent earn 
 ad agendam pcenitentiam, qua ira dei mitigaretur. Hie est 
 pius et utilis horum jejuniorum finis. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 14 : See above, S. 148, 149, cap. 24 : 
 Omnia jejunia proficisci debent ex libero spontaneoque spiritu 
 et vere humiliato, nee composita esse ad plausum vel gratiarn 
 hominum consequendam, multo minus eo, ut per ipsa velit 
 homo justitiam demereri Jejunet autem in hunc finem qui- 
 libet, ut fomenta carni detrahat et ferventius deo inserviat. 
 
 Cf. Conf. Tetrapol. cap. Y-10 ; Declar. Thorun. ii 5. 12; 
 Calvin, InstitvM. iv. 12. 14 sqq. ; Limborch, TJicol. chr. v. 75. 
 
 PurgcAorry. 
 
 The pious Christian, who dies without having made full 
 satisfaction for his sins, 1 is, according to the Eoman Catholics, 
 placed in purgatory (ignis purgalorius), that there he may 
 suffer the temporal punishment of sin, and thus, purged from 
 all impurity, be fit to enter heaven. The Greek Church and 
 the Protestant entirely reject this doctrine of a purifying fire. 2 
 
 1 Bellarmin, Purgator. ii. 9 : Restat reatus poenae et peccata venialia, quae 
 proprie dici possunt reliquiae peccatorum, ob quas est purgatorium. Has autem 
 reliquias aliquando certum est in morte purgari (in the case of martyrs), ali- 
 quando certum est non purgari, aliquando dubium est quid fiat, et probabilissi- 
 muiu est, partim purgari, partim non purgari. S. Becan. Manual, controv. i. 
 p. 197 sqq. These satisfactions not made refer partly to mortal sins, the pardon 
 of which has been obtained through the sacrament of penance only so far as 
 concerns eternal punishment, partly to venial sins, which are only temporally 
 to be expiated, which, however, cling to the most pious. Cf. Becani Man. 
 controv. i. p. 199 sq. 
 
 8 The Latinizing Greeks at Florence, 1439, went so far as this (Harduin. 
 
 Collect. Condi, ix. p. 421) : lilt ol iXtit&s ft'.ratir.fftrt; BLKcPxruaru l> 7 ri riu Qteu 
 ayawn, #fi* vt!( ei^iaif <rtif furitiai&s xetffoTs izatoroirjfiti fifl TUI r,f^a.fTr.u(iui ifteu 
 KO.} fiff.t*.tifiiiui, To.f rourvf ^vxas fxevixaTs -rtfi.ufia.if xa(a.iftfffa.i (JL'.TO. ffiani cet. 
 
 But it is well known what a slight value this Florentine compromise had for the 
 Greek Church.
 
 PENANCE. 311 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. EOMISH. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vi. justificat. can. 30 : Si quis post accep- 
 tam justificationis graftani cuilibet peccatori poenitenti ita cul- 
 pam remitti et reatum seternse pcenae deleri dixerit, ut nullus 
 remaneat reatus pcense temporalis exsolvendse vel in hoc sseculo 
 vel in future, in purgatorio, antequam ad regna coelorum aditus 
 patere possit : anathema sit 
 
 Il>. sess. xxv. purgator. : Cum catholica ecclesia, a Sp. s. 
 edocta, ex. s. litteris et antiqua patrum traditione, in s. con- 
 ciliis et novissime in hac cecumenica synodo docuerit, purga- 
 torium esse animasque ibi detentas fidelium suffragiis potis- 
 simum vero acceptabili altaris sacrificio juvari, preecipit s. 
 synodus episcopis, ut sanam de purgatorio doctrinam, a. s. 
 patribus et s. conciliis traditam, a Christi fidelibus credi, 
 teneri, et ubique preedicari diligenter studeant : apud rudem 
 vero plebem dimciliores ac subtiliores queestiones, quaeque ad 
 sedificationem non faciunt, et ex quibus plerumque nulla fit 
 pietatis accessio, a popularibus concionibus secludantur; in- 
 certa item, vel quse specie falsi laborant, evulgari ac tractari 
 non permittant ; ea vero, quse ad curiositatem quandam aut 
 superstitionem spectant vel turpe lucrum sapiunt, tanquam 
 scandala et fidelium offendicula prohibeant. 
 
 Gat. Rom. i. 6. 3 : Est purgatorius ignis, quo piorum animse 
 ad definition tempus cruciatas expiantur, ut eis in eeternam 
 patriam ingressus patere possit, in quam nihil coinquinatum 
 ingreditur. Ac de hujus quidem doctrinse veritate, quam et 
 scripturarum testimoniis et apostolica traditione confirmatam 
 esse sancta concilia declarant, eo diligentius et saspius parocho 
 disserendum erit, quod in ea tempora incidimus, quibus 
 homines sanam doctrinam non sustinent. 
 
 Observation. 
 
 Fire, the purgatorial agent, or means of purification, the Romish 
 Church has not defined. According to Klee, kath. Dogm. iii. 425, 
 the fire has been assumed as a mere matter of opinion. But Bellar- 
 mine, Pur gat. ii. 10, says : Certum est in purgatorio sicut etiam in
 
 312 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 inferno esse poenam ignis, sive iste ignis accipiatur proprie sivc meta- 
 phorice. He himself decides for the corporeal fire, c. 11. 
 
 The Limbus infantum. Children dying immediately after baptism 
 do not enter purgatory (Bellarm. Purgat. ii. 1), but, as the schoolmen 
 taught, into the limbus infantum, which is placed in loco iriferni altiore, 
 ita ut ad eum ignis non perveniat : in a higher part of the Infernus, 
 which the fires cannot reach, they undergo a poenam damni, a penalty 
 of loss ; vid. Bellarmine, Purgat. ii. G. The symbols say nothing of 
 this. The Limbus pairum, where the praj-Christian pious until the 
 descent of Christ were supposed to wait (Bellarmine, de Christo, iv. 
 10), is mentioned only in Cat. Rom. i. 6. 3. 
 
 II. GREEK. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 112: IIox; TrpeTret, vd lypoitcovfiev Sid TO Trvp 
 TO KadapTrjpiov ; ovSepia ypa<f)r) Siakapfidvei Trepl avTov' va 
 q\aST) KO.V pia Trpoo-tcaipos Ko\a<ri<; KaOapTiKrj TWV 
 , vo-Tepa O.TTO TOV OdvaTov. P. 113 : Toi>9 fivdovs 
 dvdpwTrwv, OTTOV Xeyoiwu Trepl -^rv)(<t)V, TTW? orav fjucrev- 
 crovo-iv dfj>eravor)ra<; drro TOV KOQ-JJUOV, /coXafoi/rat et? o"oi//3Xta, et? 
 vepa teal Xt/ii/at?, TTOTC Bev TOVS eBe^drjKev f) enK^rjcrla. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. xx. p. 149 : OVK eVrt irvp KaOap- 
 TTjpiov Trap' rj/Mwv, aXXa QXtyi? TI? diro <rvveib'ijcrQ)<; (/cat avTtj 
 
 {JieVTOL fLTO, TCaVV %/3^0"T7y5 eXTTi'So?) BfiJKOVa^ ea>9 CIV O 0605 
 
 6e\rj. S. Heinecc. ii. 410 f. 
 
 The notion of an intermediate state is found in Metroph. 
 Critop. Conf. c. xx. p. 147 sq. : elvai Tivas JJLIJ /xera QdvaTov 
 7^9 evepyela <ra)Tr)pla<> Tvy%dveiv aXXa Svvd/A6t, ical ev 
 TavTTjv eAc8e^e<7^at ? eXTrtSt Xe^co /SeySaia dvavTippiJTy ol 
 7Tipa0evTe<; vrpOTepov Trjs TOV @eov TraTpiKrjs pd/38ou 
 ev rcaipy ical TTJS evepyeia o~o)Tripia<s. . . . Aeyet r) etcK\r)(7ia 
 e/cetvwv -jrowrjv pr) v\ircr)v eZz/at, etV ovv op^avLKrjv fjbrj Bid 
 Si aXX? OTTOiao-ovv v\ aXXa Sid ^Xi'irea)? /col 
 
 TOVTOI<; e/c TOV fa^v 
 
 TWV oo~a i> TO!) KOO~ILU> fir) KOTO, \oyov /x^Se Offwo 
 Prayers of survivors may soften or shorten this condition. 
 Confess. Dositheis, c. 18: TavTwv (those who have not ex- 
 piated their sins upon earth) ra9 ^u^a9 aTrip-^eo-dai, ely 
 ciSov (rrio-TevofjLev^ teal vrrofjieveiv Tr)v eveica oiv elpydaavTO 
 d/j,apTr)fj.dTO)v Troivrfv elvai o eV a-vvaiad^crei T^9 eiceWev dira\-
 
 PENANCE. 313 
 
 ' eXevdepova-dat, Be VTTO rr)<; atcpas ayaQoTijTos Bid rrjs 
 TWV lepewv /cal einrouwv, a 7<av aTroi^o/^evwv eveica oL 
 (rvyyeveis aTroTeXoucrr [AeydXa Swa-fiewr) 1 ; /iaXurra TT}? 
 dvcrias, rjv ISiws VTrep TUV teefcoifirj/jievGov crvyyevwv 
 teal KOIV&S VTrep "rrdvTOJV fj tcado\. 6<rr)nepai, Trotet 
 
 Confess, orthod. p. 108, says, on the contrary : 
 d^a Koi avdpcaTrot, OTTOV va elvai clvd/iecra rwv awfy^ievtav Kal 
 ToiavTrj? Ta^eoj? avdpwTroi Sev evpia-KOvrai, (JM 
 TroXXo: a?ro roy? afj,apTW\ov$ IXevdepcavovvrat airo r&v 
 rov aSou, o^i /ze fterdvoiav rj eofj,o\6<y'T]criv ISircijv TOU? 
 aXXa fie r9 eirrrouas TWV favrtov teal irpoaev^a^ virep 
 T?}? KK\r]cria<; /cal /ie rrji> dvaifjiaKTOV fj,d\icna Ovaiav^ 
 Trpoertftepei -f] e/c/cXTycrt'a Sta TOU? %<avTa<s Kal 
 S o\ov$. . . . P. 110: (tovov at deiai Xet- 
 at Trpoaev^al Kal eXerj/Jioavvai, OTTOV ylvovvrai Sid rrjv 
 CLTTO TOU9 ^fwi/ra?, eKtlva rrjv dxpeXovai TroXXorara teal 
 diro TO, Se<Tfj,a rov aSov TTJV eXevdepovaw. 
 
 Philaret, n. 18, rejects both purgatory and every other 
 purification of the soul after death. 
 
 III. PKOTESTANT. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 307 : Purgatorium et quidquid ei solennitatis, 
 cultus et qusestus adhseret, mera diaboli larva est. Pugnat 
 enim cum primo articulo, qui docet, Christum solum et non 
 hominum opera animas liberare. S. Conf. Wirtemb. p. 123 
 eq. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 26 : Quod quidam tradunt de igne pur- 
 gatorio, fidei christianse : credo remissionem peccatorum et 
 vitam seternam, purgationique plenoe per Christum et Christi 
 sententiis adversatur. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 24 : Purgatorium arbitramur figmentum 
 esse, ex eadem ofiicina profectum, unde etiam manarunt vota 
 monastica, peregrinationes, interdicta matrimonii et usus 
 ciborum, ceremonialis certorum dierum observatio, confessio 
 auricularis, indulgentise, ceteraeque res omnes ejusmodi, quibus 
 opinantur quidam, se gratiam et salutem mereri. Ea vero 
 omnia non tantum rejicimus propter falsam meriti opinionem
 
 314 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ipsis adjunctam, sed etiam quoniam sunt humana commenta 
 et jugum ex hominum auctoritate conscientiis impositum. 
 
 Thirty-nine Artt. art. xxii. : The Bomish doctrine concern- 
 ing purgatory, pardons, worshipping, and adoration as well of 
 images as of relics, and also invocation of saints, is a fond 
 thing, vainly invented, and grounded upon no warranty of 
 Scripture, but rather repugnant to the word of God. 
 
 S. Declar. Thorun. p. 66, and, as it concerns the Arminians, 
 Curcellaei Op. p. 655 sqq. ; Limborch, Theol. christ. VL 10. 
 10 and 16. 
 
 Indulgence. 
 
 Eelease, perfect or partial, from the temporal penances 
 which are exacted even after the remission of eternal punish- 
 ments, as also from the pains of purgatory per modum suffragii 
 or by prayer, may, according to Eomish doctrine, be obtained 
 by believers out of the treasure of superabundant merit which 
 the Church has at her disposal. Such a dispensation is called 
 Indulgence. The pains of purgatory, however, may also, by 
 way of supplication, be abridged through masses for the dead, 
 prayers, satisfactions (fasts, alms, pilgrimages, etc.) of the 
 living. The Greeks reject all indulgences, as well as all 
 vicarious satisfaction for the dead. The evangelical church, 
 rejecting temporal satisfactions, rejects as a consequence the 
 need of indulgence ; denying the treasury of superabundant 
 merit, it denies the source of indulgence. 
 
 EOMISH SYMBOLS. 
 
 The doctrine of indulgences is not dogmatically exhibited 
 in the Eomish symbols. The Council of Trent only obviates 
 perversions. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxv. De indulgent.: Cumpotestas conferendi 
 indulgentias a Christo ecclesise concessa sit, atque hujusmodi 
 potestate, divinitus sibi tradita, antiquissimis etiam tempori- 
 bus ilia usa fuerit : synodus indulgentiarum usum, christiano 
 populo maxime salutarem et sacrorum conciliorum auctoritate 
 probatum, in ecclesiS, retinendum esse docet et prcecipit; 
 eosque anathemate damnat, qui aut inutiles esse asserunt
 
 PENANCE. 315 
 
 vel eas concedendi in ecclesia potestatem esse negant. In 
 his tamen concedendis moderationem juxta veterem et pro- 
 batam in ecclesia consuetudinem adhiberi cupit, ne nimia 
 facilitate ecclesiastica disciplina enervetur. Abusus vero, qui 
 in his irrepserunt, quorum occasione insigne hoc indulgentiarum 
 nomen ab hsereticis blasphematur, emendates et correctos 
 cupiens, prsesenti decreto generaliter statuit, pravos queestus 
 omnes pro his consequendis, unde plurima in christiano populo 
 abusuum causa fluxit, omnino abolendos esse. Ceteros vero, 
 qui ex superstitione, ignorantia, irreverentia aut aliunde quo- 
 modocunque provenerunt, cum ob multiplices locorum et pro- 
 vinciarum, apud quas hi committuntur, corruptelas commode 
 nequeant specialiter prohiberi, mandat omnibus episcopis, ut 
 diligenter quisque hujusmodi abusus ecelesise suse colligat cet. 
 We may give the dogmatic grounds on which indulgences 
 rest in Bellarmine's words, De indulg. i. 1 : Ecclesia et scholse 
 theologorum indulgentias vocant remissiones pcenarum, quse 
 ssepe remanent eluendse post remissionem culparum et recon- 
 ciliationem in sacramento pcenitentise adeptam, quas remis- 
 siones summi pontifices ex paterna lenitate . . . certis tem- 
 poribus et non sine justa aliqua et rationabili causa concedere 
 solent. Cap. 2 : Opus bonum, qua parte x meritorium est, 
 non potest alii applicari, potest tamen, qua satisfactorium est ; 
 . . . exstat in ecclesia thesaurus satisfactionum ex Christi 
 passionibus infinitus, qui nunquam exhauriri potent. . . . Ad 
 hunc thesaurum superfluentium satisfactionum pertinent etiam 
 passiones b. Mariae virginis et omnium aliorum sanctorum, qui 
 plus passi sunt, quam eorum peccata requirerent. Cap. 3 : 
 Satisfactiones Christos et sanctis supervacaneae applicari pos- 
 sunt aliis, qui rei sunt pcenae temporalis. Docemur enim in 
 Symbolo apostolico, fideles omnes esse invicem membra et 
 quasi vivum quoddam corpus et, sicut membra viva se in- 
 vicem juvant, ita fideles inter se bona sua communicare, prae- 
 sertim cum ea, quse uni superflua sunt, alteri necessaria vel 
 valde utilia esse possunt. As to the manner and efficacy of 
 indulgences, c. 5 : Indulgentia proprie est absolutio judiciaria 
 annexam habens solutionem ex thesauro. Dat (pontifex) 
 vere indulgentiam subditis suis . . . ; contra autem defunctis 
 non dicitur dare simpliciter indulgentiam sed per modum suf-
 
 316 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 fragii, quia non ipse sed deus acceptat compensationem pro 
 defunctis et eosdem defunctos absolvit, pontifex autem soluru 
 ofifert ex thesauro justam compensationem. . . . C. 7 : Per 
 indulg. non absolvimur nee solvimur a reatu culpae ullius i. e. 
 nee letalis nee venialis . . . ; per indulg. non tollitur nisi reatus 
 pcenae temporalis, qui remanet culpa dimissa. Indulgentite 
 liberant homines a reatu pcense non solum coram ecclesia sed 
 etiam coram deo. Cap. 14 : Ees certissima est et ap. 
 Catholicos indubitata, indulgentiis juvari posse animas, quae 
 in purgatorio pcenas luunt. Vera sententia est, indulgentias 
 prodesse (defunctis) per modum suffragii, quia non prosunt 
 per modum absolutionis juridicse, sed per modum solutionis, 
 quo modo prosunt suffragia, quse pro defunctis fieri solent. 
 Sed cum suffragia tribus modis defunctos juvent, per modum 
 meriti de congruo, per mod. impetrationis et per mod. satis- 
 factionis, indulgentioa autem non sint nisi satisfactorise, in- 
 telligendum est, indulgentias dari defunctis per modum suffragii 
 tantum satisfactorii Comp. Bellarmin. Pur gat. c. 16. 
 
 Bellarmine admits that unanimity is not to be found among 
 Eomish theologians as to the virtue of indulgences. Many 
 denied that remission of the temporal punishments of sin was 
 obtained, that is, of sin as such and as punished by God, and 
 also that the power of indulgences extended to purgatory. 
 We have given the more general view, which Bellarmine 
 maintains, and which modern theologians do not scruple at. 
 Eck, Loci, c. 23 ; Bossii Institutt. thcol. iii. p. 226 sqq. ; Bos- 
 suet, Exposit. p. 2 sq. ; Mb'hler, neue Untersuck. 65 f. ; 
 Klee, JDogmat. iii S. 280 f. 
 
 Prayers for tlie Dead. 
 
 The suffragia fidclium pro defunctis are briefly mentioned 
 in the Cone. Trid. sess. xxv. Purg. ; and among them pro- 
 minence is given to the acceptabile altaris sacrificium. As to 
 the latter, the masses for the dead, vid. Cat. Rom. ii. 4. 78 ; 
 and on the whole subject, Bellarm. Purgat. c. 15. He says 
 among other things : Tria sunt genera suffragiorum, sacri- 
 ficium missse, oratio et opera quaelibet poenalia et satisfactoria, 
 ut eleernosyna, jejunia, peregrinationes et similia.
 
 PENANCE. 317 
 
 EVANGELICAL PEG-TESTS. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 310 : (Draconis cauda ista, missam intelligo, 
 peperit multiplices abominationes et idololatrias.) Hue per- 
 tinent indulgentiae vivis et defunctis pro pecunia attributse, 
 quibus sacrilegus et damnatus ille Judas seu papa meritum 
 Christ! et merita superflua omnium sanctorum et totius eccle- 
 sise vendidit, quse omnia et singula nequaquam ferenda sunt, 
 quia carent verbo dei, non sunt mandata, non sunt necessaria, 
 sed pugnant cum articulo primo. Meritum enim Christi non 
 nostris operibus aut nummis, sed per fidem ex gratia appre- 
 henditur et obtinetur, sine pecunia et merito, non per papse 
 potestatem sed per prsedicationem verbi dei oblatum et 
 propositum. 
 
 The Eeformed Confessions reject indulgences only in a few 
 simple terms, as the matter had been thoroughly sifted already. 
 Selv. ii. c. 14; Gall. art. 24; Eng. Art. xxii. : Conf. Scot. 
 128. Barclay, for the Quakers, is very strong, Apol. vii.
 
 XVIII. 
 
 CONFORMATION; MAKEIAGE; SUPEEME UNCTION; 
 
 OKDEKS. 
 
 THE Protestant Church rejects these four sacraments as such, 
 because the scriptural arguments adduced in their favour 
 appear untenable. Supreme unction is indeed absolutely 
 renounced ; ordination and confirmation are retained as use- 
 ful rites, which exert a moral influence ; lastly, on the mar- 
 riage obligations, whose connection with the religious life is 
 recognised, the Protestant Church pronounces an ecclesiastical 
 consecration. What the Greek and Latin Churches have taught 
 concerning the matter and form of these four sacraments will 
 appear in the following extracts from their symbols. 
 
 a. Confirmation. 
 
 I. GREEK AND LATIN. 
 
 The difference between the Romish and the Greek Confirma- 
 tion does not affect the internal sacramental elements, but 
 the external. 1. In the Greek Church, confirmation may be 
 validly administered by every priest. 2. The Greeks attach 
 confirmation immediately to baptism; while the Eoman 
 Catholic Church requires that confirmation should be ad- 
 ministered not before the seventh year at least. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. vii. confirmat. can. 1 : Si quis dixerit, con- 
 firmationem baptizatorum otiosam esse ceremoniam et non 
 
 318
 
 CONFIRMATION, MARRIAGE, SUPEEME UNCTION, ORDEKS. 319 
 
 potius verum et proprium sacramentum, aut olim nihil aliud 
 fuisse, quam catechesin quandam, qua adolescentise proximi 
 fidei suse rationem corain ecclesia exponebant : anathema sit. 
 Can. 3 : Si quis dixerit, sanctae confirmationis ordinarimn 
 minis trum non esse solum episcopum, sed quemvis simplicem 
 sacerdotem, anathema sit. Cf. sess. xxiji. can. 7. 
 
 Cat. Horn, ii 3. 2 : Confirmationem ab ecclesia hoc sacra- 
 mentum idcirco vocari docendum est, quoniam, qui baptizatus 
 est, cum ab episcopo sacro chrismate unguitur, additis solem- 
 nibus illis verbis : Signo te signo crucis et confirmo te chrismate 
 salutis, in nomine patris et jttii et Spiritus sancti, nisi aliud 
 efficientiam impediat, novae virtutis robore firmior atque adeo 
 perfectus Christi miles esse incipit. 
 
 Ib. ii 3. 5 : Cum baptismi gratiS, homines in novam vitam 
 gignantur, confirmationis autem sacramento, qui jam geniti 
 sunt, viri evadant, evacuatis quee erant parvuli : satis intelli- 
 gitur, quantum in naturali vita generatio ab incremento distat, 
 tantundem inter se differre baptismum, qui regenerandi vim 
 habet, et confirmationem, cujus virtute fideles augescunt et 
 perfectum animi robur assumunt. 
 
 Ib. ii. 3. 18 : Observandum est, omnibus quidem post bap- 
 tismum confirmationis sacramentum posse administrari, sed 
 minus tamen expedire, hoc fieri, antequam pueri rationis usum 
 habuerint. Quare si duodecimus annus exspectandus non 
 videatur, usque ad septimum certe hoc sacramentum differre 
 maxime convenit. Neque enim confirmatio ad salutis neces- 
 sitatem instituta est, sed ut ejus virtute optime instruct! et 
 parati inveniremur, cum nobis pro Christi fide pugnandum 
 esset: ad quod sane pugnse genus pueros, qui adhuc usu 
 rationis carent, nemo aptos judicarit. 
 
 Ib. ii. 3. 20: Hasc sacra et mystica signa ejusrnodi esse 
 demonstratum est, quse gratiam declarant atque efi&ciunt. Ex 
 quo sequitur, ut peccata etiam condonet ac remittat, quoniam 
 gratiam simul cum peccato ne fingere quidem nobis licet. Sed 
 prseter ho3c, quee cum aliis communia censenda sunt, primum 
 quidem illud proprie confirmationi tribuitur, quod baptismi 
 gratiam perficit. Qui enim per baptismum christiani efifecti 
 sunt, quasi infantes modo geniti, teneritatem adhuc et molli- 
 tiem quandam habent ac deinde chrismatis sacramento adver-
 
 320 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 sus omnes carnis, mundi et diaboli impetus robustiores fiunt : 
 et eorum animus in fide omnino confirmatur ad confitendum 
 et glorificandum nomen Jesu Christi : ex quo etiam nomen 
 ipsum inventum esse nemo dubitat. 
 
 Ib. ii. 3. 23: Habet confirmatio earn vim, ut characterem 
 imprimat ; quo fit, ut nulla" unquam ratione iterari possit. 
 
 The theology of confirmation is very fully handled by 
 Bellarmine, as also by Klee, K. D. iii 
 
 Conf. ortlwd. p. 161 : To Sevrepov fjivartfptov elvai TO ftvpov 
 rov xpia-fAaro?, TO OTTOIOV tjp^icrev drro rov tcaipbv l/celvov, OTTOV 
 TO 7rvev/Aa TO ayiov eKard/3r)Kev et? TOW? aTrocrToXov?, a- 
 Ta? TOW? fie rrjv Oeiav rov yapiv, Bid va Krjpvrrova'i, 
 real aStaXeiTTTO)? rrjv irL<mv rov Xpicrrov. 
 
 Ib. p. 163 : Upwrov fyrelrcu (et9 TO fivcrr^piov rov pvpov 
 rov p^JiV/iaTO?) va yiverat OTTO rov avwrdrw CTTLO-KOTTOV TO pvpov 
 TOUTO. Aevrepov va e%r) rrjv "TrpeTrovpevijv rov vXrjv, rjyovv TO 
 e\aiov, TO j3d\.(rafj,ov K.O.I ra \ot7ra /j,v planar a. Tplrov ifrrelrai, 
 ort, 7rapvdv<> /j,era TO /Sa7rTto~/ia va ^piy o iepevs rov 
 fj,evov et? ra Sicapurpeva yu-e\-?7, 7ri\eya)v ra \6<yia e/ceiva- 
 Stopea? Tn/ev/iaTO? dytov, afjufjv. 'Airo TO nvartfpiov rovro 
 vovvrai, ol /capital rovroi' Ilpwrov Biarl Ka0a>s fMera 
 dvajev6fj,eda reroia? \oyfjs, /Lie TO 07^0^ pvpov yev6/j,eda fj,ero%ot, 
 rov dyiov Trvev/jiaro^ (3e/3aio)6evres et? rrjv vriariv rov Kvpiov, 
 teal av^dvoftev et? rrjv deiav %dpiv Kara rov dTroaro\ov. Aevre- 
 pov StaTt /ie rrjv Bvva/Jitv rov dyiov rev. OI/TCU? e'lfjiea-Qev /8e/3atoi 
 real a-repeol OTTOV Sev rj^Tropei va /SXa-v/r^ Ka06\ov 6 vorjros 
 e^#po? rrjv "^rv^v /tia?. 
 
 Cf. Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. 8, p. 87 sqq. ; Jerem. in Act. 
 Wirtemb. p. 79. The latter confesses that this sacrament rests 
 upon no scriptural authority, but upon apostolical tradition. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 The Protestant Confessions mention Confirmation (the 
 Komish) only to reject it. Apol. A. C. p. 201 : Confirmatio et 
 extrema unctio sunt ritus accepti a patribus, quos ne ecclesia 
 quidem tanquarn necessaries ad salutem requirit, quia non 
 habent mandatum Dei. Conf. Saxon, p. 82: Eitus confir- 
 mationis, quern nunc episcopi retinent, quid est nisi inanis
 
 CONFIRMATION, MARRIAGE, SUPREME UNCTION, ORDERS. 321 
 
 umbra ? Conf. Heh. ii. c. 1 9 : Confinnatio et extrema unctio 
 inventa sunt hominum, quibus nullo cum damno carere potest 
 ecclesia. But the earliest theologians recommended Confirma- 
 tion as freed from papistical superstition (Chemnicius, Exam. 
 Cone. Trid. ii. 3. 25; Calvin, Instit. iv. 19. 4; cf. a. Declar. 
 Thorun. ii. 14. 1) ; and since the middle of the seventeenth 
 century, this ceremony, which our Church has never held to 
 be essential, has been everywhere either introduced or brought 
 into publicity. S. Limborch, Theol. chr. v. 77. 2 sq. 
 
 b. Marriage: Divorce. 
 
 I. EOMISH. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxiv. matrim. : Gratiam, quse naturalem 
 amorem perficeret et indissolubilem unitatem confirmaret con- 
 jugesque sanctificaret, ipse Christus, sacramentorum institutor 
 atque perfector, sua nobis passione promeruit. . . . Cum igitur 
 matrimonium in lege evangelica veteribus connubiis per Chris- 
 tum gratia prsestet, merito inter novse legis sacramenta an- 
 numerandum patres, concilia et universalis ecclesiae traditio 
 semper docuerunt. 
 
 Ib. can. 1 : Si quis dixerit, matrimonium non esse vere et 
 proprie unum ex septem legis evangelicse sacramentis a Christo 
 institutum, sed ab hominibus in ecclesia inventum neque 
 gratiam conferre : anathema sit. 
 
 Cat. Bom. ii. 8. 3 : Ita ex communi theologorum sententia 
 definitur : matrimonium est viri et mulieris maritalis conjunctio, 
 inter legitimas personas individuam vitse consuetudinem reti- 
 nens. Ib. ii. 8. 15: Quemadmodum matrimonium, ut natu- 
 ralis conjunctio ad propagandum humanum genus ab initio 
 institutum est, ita deinde, ut populus ad veri dei et salvatoris 
 nostri Christi cultum et religionem procrearetur atque educa- 
 retur, sacramenti dignitas illi tributa est. Cum enim Christus 
 vellet arctissimse illius necessitudinis, quse ei cum ecclesia 
 intercedit, suseque erga nos immensse caritatis certum aliquod 
 signum dare, tanti mysterii dignitatem hac potissimum maris 
 et feminse sanctH conjunctione declaravit. Quod quidem ap- 
 tissime factum esse, ex eo intelligi potest, quod ex omnibus 
 
 x
 
 322 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 humanis necessitudinibus nulla inter se homines magis quam 
 matrimonii vinculum constringit, maxim&que inter se vir et 
 uxor caritate et benevolentiS, devincti sunt. Atque idcirco fit, 
 ut frequenter sacrse literae nuptiarum similitudine divinam 
 hanc Christi et ecclesiae copulationem nobis ante oculos pro- 
 ponant 
 
 rb. ii. 8. 23 : Primnm matrimonii bonum est proles, hoc 
 est liberi, qui ex justa" et legitima suscipiuntur uxore. Id 
 enim tanti fecit apostolus, ut dicerit : Salvabitur mulier per 
 filiorum generationem. Nee vero hoc de procreatione solum, 
 sed de educatione etiam et discipline, qua filii ad pietatem 
 erudiuntur, intelligendum est. 24 : Sequitur fides, quod est 
 alterum matrimonii bonum, non ille virtutis habitus, quo im- 
 buimur, cum baptismum percipimus, sed fidelitas quaedam, qua 
 mntuo vir uxori - et uxor viro se ita obstringit, ut alter alteri 
 sui corporis potestatem tradat, sanctumque illud conjugii foedus 
 nunquam se violaturum pollicetur. 25: Tertium bonum 
 sacramentum appellatur, vinculum scilicet matrimonii, quod 
 nunquam dissolvi potest. Nam, ut est apud apostolum, domi- 
 nus praecipit uxorem a viro non discedere : quod si discesserit, 
 manere innuptam aut viro suo reconciliari : et vir uxorem non 
 dimittat. Si enim matrimonium, ut sacramentum est, Christi 
 conjunctionem cum ecclesia signat, necesse est, ut Christus se 
 nunquam ab ecclesia disjungit, ita uxorem a viro, quod ad 
 matrimonii vinculum attinet, separari non posse. 
 
 As to the matter and form of this sacrament, it has been 
 the most common opinion of theologians that the matter is 
 the corpora or persona contrdhentium, and the form the verba 
 or signa mutuum consensum exprimentia. Consequently the 
 bridal pair are the ministri sacramenti. Against this opinion 
 the dignity of the priestly benediction has been urged by Berg 
 and others. See, on this controversy, Bossius and Schmid. 
 
 IL GKEEK. 
 
 Conf. orikod. p. 183 : 'O TI/JUOS 7/xo9, o OTTOIO? yiverai irpw- 
 rov (j.ev /Lt Tr)v t9 aXX^Xou? a-v/x^wvlav rov avSpos KOI T?}<? 71;- 
 VCUKOS ^copt? TWO? e/i7ro8iV/iaT09' TI oTTola o-vfKbwvia &ev <f)dvi<Tev 
 Bia a\i]0ivov yd/JMv av/3@a<ri$, irapa etceivoi ol tSioi va
 
 CONFIRMATION, MARRIAGE, SUPREME UNCTION, ORDERS. 323 
 
 ptfaaxnv a\\ij\ov$ TWV eftTrpocrdev TOV iepites rrjv v7r6a-%e<Tiv 
 ?' . . . varepov Be j3e(3aia>veTai, Kal evXoyrjrat, CLTTO TOV lepea 
 77 (ru^wvia Kal vTroa^ecri^ TCOV. Cf. Metroph. Critop. 
 
 Conf. c. 12, p. 114 sqq. ; Jerem. in Actis Wirtemb. pp. 78, 
 
 80, 241. 
 
 The Greek Church permits no fourth marriage, and makes 
 
 the second and third difficult (Met. Critop. Conf. 12).- 
 
 Divorce. 
 
 The Eoman Catholic Church declares every dissolution of 
 marriage, or divortium (which allows another marriage), even 
 after adultery resulting, to be unlawful, and permits only a 
 separation of the pair. The Greeks, on the contrary, like the 
 Mennonites, admit adultery to be a reason, and the only suf- 
 ficient reason, for divorce. Metrop. Critop. Conf. c. 1 3 : " The 
 married pair must not bs separated for any reason save that 
 of adultery, according to the gospel." As to the law principles 
 which regulate the practice of the Greek Church, vide Heinecc. 
 ii. 393. The Protestant doctrine will appear below. 
 
 I. EOMAN SYMBOLS. 
 
 ConciL Trid. sess. xxiv. can. 7 : Si quis dixerit, ecclesiam 
 errare, cum docuit et docet juxta evangelicam et apostolicam 
 doctrinam, propter adulterium alterius conjugum matrimonii 
 vinculum non posse dissolvi, et utrumque, vel etiam innocen- 
 tem, qui causam adulterio non dedit, non posse, altero conjuge 
 vivente, aliud matrimonium contrahere : mcecharique eum, qui 
 dimissa adultera" aliam duxerit, et earn, quse dimisso adultero 
 alii nupserit : anathema sit. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 8. 20 sq. : Christi testimonio (Matt. xix. 9) 
 facile comprobatur, nullo divortio vinculum matrimonii dis- 
 solvi posse. Si enim post libellum repudii mulier a viri lege 
 soluta esset, liceret ei sine ullo adulterii crimine alteri viro 
 nubere. Atqui dominus aperte denunciat: omnis, qui dimittit 
 uxorem suam et alteram ducit, moschatur. Quare conjugii 
 vinculum nulla re nisi morte disrumpi, perspicuum est. . . . 
 Ac ne forte alicui videatur durior matrimonii lex, quod nulla
 
 324 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 unquam ratione dissolvi possit, docendum est, quse sint cum 
 ea utilitates conjunctee. Primum enim homines in conjun- 
 gendis matrimoniis virtutem potius et moram similitudinem, 
 quam divitias et pulchritudinem spectandam esse hinc intelli- 
 gent, qua quidem re communi societati maxime consuli nemo 
 dubitare potest. Praeterea, si divortio matrimonium dissol- 
 veretur, vix unquam dissidendi causae hominibus, quse iis ab 
 antiquo pacis et pudicitise hoste quotidie objicerentur, dees- 
 sent. Nunc vero, cum fideles secum cogitant, quamvis etiam 
 conjugii convictu et consuetudine careant, se tamen matrimonii 
 vinculo constrictos teneri omnemque alterius uxoris ducendae 
 spem sibi praecisam esse, esL re fit, ut ad iracundiam et dissidia 
 tradiores esse consueverint. Quod si interdum etiam divor- 
 tium faciant et diutius conjugis desiderium ferre non possint, 
 facile per amicos reconciliati ad ejus convictum redeunt. 
 
 Cf. Bellarmin, De sacram. matrim. c. 1 4-1 7 ; Klee, Jcath. 
 Doymat. iii 317 ffi; Walter, Kirchenrccht. S. 620 ff. 
 
 IL PROTESTANT. 
 
 The Protestant symbols recognise in marriage a divine in- 
 stitution (Conf. Aug. p. 33 ; Apol. A. C. p. 238 ; Cat. maj. 
 455 ; Conf. Helv. i. art. 27 ; Helv. ii. 29), but without admit- 
 ting that it is a sacrament. Apol. p. 202 : Matrimonium non 
 est primum institution in novo Testamento, sed statim initio, 
 creato genere humano. "It has the commandment of God, 
 it has also the promises, not indeed peculiar to the New Testa- 
 ment, but pertaining to life universal in the body. Where- 
 fore; if any one wishes to call it a sacrament, he ought to 
 distinguish it from those more proper sacraments which are 
 signs in the New Testament, testimonies of grace and of the 
 remission of sins." Cf. Calvin, Instit. iv. 19. 34; Conf. Helv. 
 ii. cap. 19; Dec. Thor. p. 67. The ecclesiastical benediction 
 was, however, always usual in the Protestant Church, with the 
 exception of Holland (Luther's Traiibuchlcin became an ap- 
 pendix of the Catechism), but not as necessary, rather as an 
 edifying usage. 1 
 
 1 In the Harmon. Conf., the Conf. Helv. ii. c. 29 has : confirmentur (conjugia) 
 publice in templo cum prccatione et benedidione.
 
 CONFIRMATION, MARRIAGE, SUPREME UNCTION, ORDERS. 325 
 
 As to divorce, the Protestant symbols contain nothing com- 
 plete. Generally, we read in A. Sm. p. 355 : injusta est tra- 
 ditio, quse prohibet conjugium personae innocenti post factum 
 divortium. The Conf. Sax., p. 80, is more copious: De divor- 
 tiis firmissime tenetur regula : peccare eos, qui vel adulterio 
 vel desertione initium faciunt distractionis et adulteri et adul- 
 terse, et desertores et desertrices condemnamus voce docentium 
 in ecclesiis et judicum in consistoriis, et a magistratibus severe 
 puniuntur. Sed personse innocenti, cum re cognita" pronun- 
 tiatur esse libera, non prohibetur conjugium, ut deum invocare 
 et pie vivere possit. . . . Haec nostra consuetudo et cum veteri 
 ecclesia congruit. Vide Conf. Wirtemb. p. 120 ; Chemnicius, 
 Exam. Cone. Trid. ii 14, p. 600 sqq. ; limborch, Theol. chr. v. 
 60. 33 sqq. 
 
 c. Extreme Unction: Extrema Unctio. 
 
 EOMISH AND GREEK. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xiv. Procem. de. sacr. extr. unct. : Visum est 
 synodo, praecedenti doctrinae de pcenitentia adjungere ea, quse 
 sequuntur de sacramento extremae unctionis : quod non modo 
 poenitentise, sed et totius Christianas vitae, quse perpetua pceni- 
 tentia esse debet, consummativum existimatum est a patribus. 
 Primum itaque circa illius institutionem declarat et docet, 
 quod clementissimus redemtor noster, quemadmodum auxilia 
 maxima in sacramentis aliis praeparavit, quibus christiani con- 
 servare se integros, dum viverent, ab omni graviori spiritus 
 incommode possint, ita extreme unctionis sacramento finem 
 vitse tanquam firmissimo quodam praesidio munivit. 
 
 Ib. cap. 1 : Instituta est sacra unctio infirmorum tanquam 
 vere et proprie sacramentum N. T., a. Christo Marc. vi. 13, 
 quidem insinuatum, per Jacobum autem (v. 14 sq.) fidelibus 
 commendatum ac promulgatum. . . . Intellexit ecclesia, mate- 
 riam esse oleum ab episcopo benedictum. Nam unctio aptis- 
 sime Spiritus sancti gratiam repraesentat ; formam deinde esse 
 ilia verba : per istam unctionem cet. 
 
 /&. cap. 2 : Oratio fidei salvabit infirmuni et alleviabit eum 
 dominus et, si in peccatis sit, dimittentur ei. Ees etenim haec
 
 326 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 gratia est Spiritus sancti, cujus nnctio delicta, si quae sint 
 adhuc expianda, ac peccati reliquias abstergit et aegroti ani- 
 mam alleviat et confirmat, magnam in eo divinse misericordise 
 fiduciam excitando, qua infirmus sublevatus . . . et sanitatem 
 corporis interdum, ubi saluti animae expedient, consequitnr. 
 
 Ib. cap. 3 : Declaratur, esse hanc unctionem infirmis adhi- 
 bendam, illis vero prassertim, qui tarn periculose decumbunt, 
 ut in exitu vita? constituti videantur. Quod si infirmi post 
 susceptam hanc unctionem convaluerint, iterum hujus sacra- 
 menti subsidio juvari poterunt, cum in aliud simile vitae dis- 
 crimen inciderint. 
 
 Cat. Horn. ii. 6. 9 : Docendi sunt fideles, quamvis hoc sacra- 
 mentum ad omnes pertineat, queedam tamen hominum genera 
 excipi, quibus administrandum non est. Ac primum exci- 
 piuntur, qui sano et finno corpore sunt. lis enim extremam 
 unctionem tribuendam non esse, et apostolus docet, cum in- 
 quit : Infinnatur quis in vobis, . . . et ratio ostendit, siquidem 
 ob earn rem instituta est, non modo ut animae, sed etiam ut 
 corpori medicinam afferat. Cum igitur illi tantum, qui morbo 
 laborant, curatione indigeant, idcirco iis etiam, qui adeo peri- 
 culose aegrotare videntur, ut, ne supremus illis vitae dies instet, 
 metuendum sit, hoc sacramentum praeberi debet. Nemini 
 igitur, qui graviori morbo affectus non sit, sacramentum unc- 
 tionis dare licet, tametsi vitae periculum adeat, vel quia peri- 
 culosam navigationem paret, vel quia prcelium initurus sit, a 
 quo illi certa mors impendeat, vel etiam si capitis damnatus 
 ad supplicium raperetur. Omnes praeterea, qui rationis usu 
 carent, ad hoc sacramentum suscipiendum apti non sunt ; et 
 pueri, qui nulla peccata admittunt, quorum reliquias sanare 
 hujus sacramenti remedio opus sit; amentes item et furiosi, 
 nisi interdum rationis usum haberent, et eo potissimum tern- 
 pore pii animi significatiqnem darent peterentque, ut sacro 
 oleo unguerentur. 
 
 Ib. ii. 6. 11 : In quibus illud observare oportet, tm eadem- 
 que aegrotatione, cum aeger in eodem vitae periculo positus est, 
 semel tantum unguendum esse. Quod si post susceptam hanc 
 unctionem aeger convaluerit, quoties postea in id vitae discri- 
 men incident, toties ejusdem sacramenti subsidium ei poterit 
 adhiberi.
 
 CONFIRMATION, MARRIAGE, SUPREME UNCTION, ORDERS. 327 
 
 Conf. orihod. p. 185 sq. : To ev%e\aiov TO OTTOLOV elvai Sia- 
 TCTayuevov diro TOV XpiGTov (Mr. VL 13). . . . TIpwTov irpeTrec 
 va Trpocre^ofjiev, va <yiWrat TO nvarijpiov TOVTO (ev^e^atov) diro 
 tepets fie ra d/co\ovda rov avaTrjpLOv ical oyi curb Tiva d\\ov 
 Bevrepov va elvcu TO eXatov /cadapov %&>/?/? TWOS dpTvaaTos, KOI 
 va elvai 6 do~0evr)S 6p06So%os ical Ka6o\iicf]s 7rurT69, va elvat, 
 eo/J,o\oyovfj,evo<; TO, a/iapr^yaara TOV ep,Trpoa'6ev et? TOV iepea 
 
 TQV TTVeVfiaTLKOV TOV Kttl TplTOV 6t9 TOV KaipOV TOV %pl(TfUlTO<; 
 
 va SiojSa^erat r\ eup^ eKeivrj, els TTJV oTroiav epfj,r)veveTai TOV 
 fjLVo-Trjpiov TOVTOV fj Suvafjiis. Ta Sidtyopa ical Kapirovs OTTOV 
 yevvovvTat aTro TO fiva-Tijpiov TOVTO, 6 a7roo-TO\09 'la/ceo/So? (v. 
 14) Tou? epfirjvevei, \eycovTas atyetriv af^apTiwv r) a-coTTjpiav 
 ijrin?}9, eTretTa vyeiav TOV cr<w/iaT09 tca\a fcal irdvroTe rj 6epa- 
 rreia TOV o*c>yu,aT09 va fj,rjv yiveTat,, aXV rj a<f)<ri<; TWV ajjLapTiwv 
 Trjs tyvxfis TrdvTOTe els TOV peTavoovvTa d/co\ov6f). 
 
 Cf. Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. 1 3, p. 117 sqq. ; Jerem. in 
 Act. Wirtemb. pp. 81, 242. The Greek Church deviates from 
 the Roman, in that it does not defer the anointing till deadly 
 peril. Vid. Metroph. Critop. Conf. p. 121, ov uevo/jiev TO, \oia-0ui 
 TOV icdfjLVOVTOs Kal TOT et9 TavTrjv (%pi(riv) ep^oaeBa, aXX' ert 
 eX-7rt'8a9 dyadas fyovTes vTrep Trjs vytelas eKeivov ^pca/ieda TOVTO> 
 To> iivcFTrjpia). . . . ware ov% a-na^ TOV j3iov aXXa /cat 
 yjpr}aQai, TOVTW, tcadd Kal Tols lafAaTitcois 
 aKts ^pco/ie^a, ocrd/as VO(J"TI<JO^V. 
 
 Against extreme unction as a sacrament, see Apol. A. 0. 
 p. 201; Conf. Hch. ii. c. 19; Conf. Wirtemb. p. 121 sq. ; 
 Conf. Saxon, p. 82 ; Declar. Thorun. p. 66. 
 
 d. Orders: Ordinatio. 
 
 I. ROMAN AND GREEK. 
 
 Con. Trid. sess. xxiii. Sacram. ordin. cap. 3 : Cum scripturse 
 testimonio, apostolica traditione et patrum unanimi consensu 
 perspicuum sit, per sacram ordinationem, quse verbis et signis 
 exterioribus perficitur gratiam conferri: dubitare nemo debet, 
 ordinem esse vere et proprie unum ex septem sanctse ecclesise 
 sacramentis. Cf. can. 3. 
 
 /&. can. 4 : Si quis dix., per sacram. ordinationem non dari
 
 328 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Spiritum sanctum, . . . aut per eam non imprimi characterem, 
 vel eum qui sacerdos semel fuit, laicum rursus fieri posse, an. sit. 
 
 7&. can. 7 : Si quis dix., episcopos non esse presbyteris 
 superiores, vel non habere potestatem confirmandi et ordinandi, 
 vel eam quam habent, illis esse cum presbyteris communem, 
 ... an. sit. 
 
 Cat. Rom. ii. 7. 34 : Constat, quamvis ordinis sacramentum 
 maxime ad ecclesiae utilitatern et pulchritudinem spectet, tamen 
 in ejus quoque animo, qui sacris initiatur, sanctificationis 
 gratiam efficere, qua idoneus habilisque ad recte munere suo 
 fungendum sacramentaque administranda reddatur; quemad- 
 modum etiam baptismi gratia quilibet ad alia sacramenta per- 
 cipienda aptus efficitur. 
 
 The question to what grade of clerical order consecration is 
 a sacrament, is answered by Bellarmin, Sacram. ord. c. 5 sqq. : 
 Convenit inter omnes catholicos, ordinem presbyterorum esse 
 vere ac proprie sacramentum, de aliis non omnino convenit. 
 De diaconis valde probabile et omnino tenendum est, eorum 
 ordinationem sacramentum esse, licet id non sit certum ex fide 
 (i. e. non potest evidenter deduci ex verbo dei scripto vel tra- 
 dito). De subdiaconatu non est tanta certitudo, quanta de 
 diaconatu. Nam nee in scripturis de eo fit mentio, nee ejus 
 ordinatio habet manus impositionem, nee subdiaconi mini- 
 strant eucharistiam aut alia facere possunt quse diaconi, et 
 denique non pertinent proprie ad hierarchiam, nisi ut ministri 
 beirarcharum. Est tamen valde probabile, etiam hunc ordinem 
 esse sacramentum turn, quia videtur imprimere characterem, 
 cum sit initerabilis, turn quia habet annexum solenne votum 
 continent!, turn denique quia haec est communis theologorum 
 sententia cet. De minoribus ordin. minus probabile est, quod 
 sacramenta sint, quam de subdiaconatu, nam neque est ita 
 communis sententia cet. Absolute tamen probabilior sententia 
 est, quse ordines omnes sacramenta esse docet, quam ea, quoa 
 id negat cet. 
 
 Conf. ortkod. p. 173 : 'H iepacrvvr), OTTOV clvai 
 Bierd^dt] rot? aTTOtrroXoi? UTTO rov Xpta-rov, KOI Sia TT}S e 
 o-ea>5 rcav ^eiptav avrwv (J>e%pi TT}? <rrniepov yiverai 17 %ipoTovia, 
 BtaBe^afjievcav TWV eTTia/coTrcav avrovs TT/OO? SidSoaiv rwv Oeiwv 
 fj.va"rripi<av teal Siaicoviav rrjs <ra>TT]pia<> TUV d
 
 CONFIRMATION, MARRIAGE, SUPREME UNCTION, OKDERS. 329 
 
 Cf. Jerem. in Actis Wirteinb. pp. 78, 241. 
 Ordination is called by the Greeks ^tporovia. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C., p. 201 sq., admits that orders may be a sacra- 
 ment in the wider sense ; that is, if ordo means the ministry 
 of the word. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 352 : Cum jure divino non sint diversi gradus 
 episcopi et pastoris, manifestum est, ordinationem a pastore in 
 sua ecclesia factum jure divino ratam esse. 
 
 The evangelical doctrine of ordination is best given by 
 Chemnicius, Examen Concilii Tridentini, ed. E. Preuss, S. 4*79, 
 480. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 1 8 : Qui electi sunt (ab ecclesia vel ad 
 hoc deputatis ab ecclesia), ordinentur a senioribus cum ora- 
 tionibus publicis et impositione manuum. 
 
 /&. cap. 19 : Sunt, qui sacramenta septem numerent. Ex 
 quibus nos . . . ordinationem ministrorum non papisticam 
 quidem illam sed apostolicam . . . agnoscimus institutum 
 esse dei utile, sed non sacramentum. 
 
 Declar. Tliorun. p. 67.
 
 XIX. 
 
 THE .CHURCH: ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 
 
 FIKST POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 THE Eomanists term the Church the fellowship of those bap- 
 tized into Christ, as founded upon earth by Christ under His 
 representative, the Pope, as its visible head. The Protestants, 
 on the contrary, term it the fellowship of the saints, in which 
 the gospel is purely preached and the sacraments are duly, 
 that is, in harmony with their institution, administered. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The preaching of the word of God and administration of the sacra- 
 ments, as open to observation and scriptural test, have been regarded 
 by Protestants as the externce notce of the Church. Apol. A. C. 144 ; 
 Helv. ii. c. 17. That which lies at the basis of the fellowship of 
 saints, true faith, is something internal. With reference to this in 
 particular, and to the doctrine of election, some Reformed Confessions 
 term the Church invisibilis: Helv. ii. c. 17 ; Conf. Scot. art. 16. Cf. 
 Calvin, Institt. iv. 1. 7. The German Reformers rather avoided this 
 term invisible, on account of Anabaptist and Romanist perversions : 
 cf. e.g. Melanch. Loc. i. p. 283. [That the Church is at once a 
 fellowship and an institution, is not doubted by either the Romanist 
 or the Evangelical Church. The question is only as to which of the 
 two is the foremost and most essential element. The Roman Church 
 teaches that the Church is principaliter institution ; the Protestants, 
 that it is principaliter fellowship.] 
 
 330
 
 THE CHURCH: ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 331 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTB10NIES. 
 
 I. EOMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Confut. A. C.7: Septimus Conf. A. artic., quo affirmatur 
 ecclesiam congregationem esse sanctorum, non potest citra fidei 
 prsejudicium admitti, si per hoc segregentur ab ecclesia" mali 
 et peccatores. Nam articulus ille in Constantiensi damnatus 
 est concilio inter errores damnatse memorise J. Huss et plane 
 contradicit evangelio (Matt. xiii. 47 sq., xxv. 1 sqq.). 
 
 Cat. Horn. i. 10. 7 : In ecclesia militant! duo sunt hominum 
 genera, bonorum et irnprobonun, et improbi quidem eorundem 
 sacramentorum participes, eandem quoque, quam boni, fidem 
 profitentur, vit& ac moribus dissimiles ; boni vero in ecclesia" 
 dicuntur ii, qui non solum fidei professione et communione 
 sacramentorum sed etiam spiritu gratise et caritatis vinculo 
 inter se conjuncti et colligati sunt. . . . Bonos igitur et im- 
 probos ecclesia complectitur, quemadmodum et divinse litterae 
 et sanctorum virorum scripta testantur. 8 : Quamvis autem 
 bonos et malos ad ecclesiam pertinere catholica fides vere et 
 constanter affirmet, ex iisdem tamen fidei regulis fidelibus ex- 
 plicandum est, utriusque partis diversam admodum rationem 
 esse ; ut enim paleae cum frumento in area" confusae sunt vel 
 interdum membra varie intermortua corpori conjuncta, ita etiam 
 mali in ecclesiS, continentur. 11: Unus est ecclesiee rector 
 ac gubernator, invisibilis quidem Christus . . ., visibilis autem 
 is, qui Eomanam cathedram Petri, apostolorum principis, legi- 
 timus successor tenet. 
 
 (Bellarmini Eccles. milit. c. 2 : Nostra sententia est, ecclesiam 
 unam tantum esse, non duas, et illam unam et veram esse 
 co2tum hominum, ejusdem christianse fidei professione et eorun- 
 dem sacramentorum communione colligatum, sub regrmme legi- 
 timorum pastorum ac prsecipue unius Christi in terris vicarii, 
 Eomani pontificis. Ex quS, definitione facile colligi potest, 
 qui homines ad ecclesiam pertineant, qui vero ad earn non 
 pertineant. Tres enim sunt partes hujus definitionis. Pro- 
 fessio verse fidei, sacramentorum communio et subjectio ad 
 legitimum pastorem, Eomanum pontificem. Eatione primse 
 partis excluduntur omnes infideles, tarn qui nunquam fuerunt
 
 332 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 in ecclesia, ut Judaei, Turcae, Pagani, tarn qui fuerunt et reces- 
 serunt, ut haeretici et apostate. Eatione secundae excluduntur 
 catecliumeni et excommunicati, quoiiiam illi non sunt admissi 
 ad sacramentorum communionem, isti sunt dimissL Eatione 
 tertiae excluduntur schismatici, qui habent fidem et sacramenta, 
 sed non subduntur legitimo pastori, et ideo foris profitentur 
 fidem et sacramenta percipiunt. Includuntur autem onines 
 alii, etiamsi reprobi, scelesti et impii sunt. Atque hoc interest 
 inter sententiam nostram et alias omnes, quod onines alise re- 
 quirunt internas virtutes ad constituendum aliquem in ecclesia, 
 et propterea ecclesiam veram invisibilem faciunt ; nos autem 
 et credimus, in ecclesia inveniri omnes virtutes, fidem, spem, 
 caritatem et ceteras, tamen ut aliquis aliquo modo dici possit 
 pars verae ecclesiae, de qua scripturse loquuntur, non putamus 
 requiri ullam internam virtutem, sed tantum externam profes- 
 sionem fidei et sacramentorum communionem, quoe sensu ipso 
 percipitur. Ecclesia enim est ccetus honrinurn ita visibilis et 
 palpabilis, ut est costus populi Eomani, vel regnum Gallioe aut 
 respublica Venetorum.) 
 
 IL GREEK. 
 
 In the Confessions of the Greeks there is no permanent defi- 
 nition of Church : even Metr. Critop., c. 7, leaves it undecided 
 whether eKxXrja-ia signifies a-va-TTjfui iravrwv ruv TM evarfje\iKu> 
 KTjpvyfutTi OTTCOGOVV TreiffdevTcov, op6oB6(ov KOI aiperiK&v, or, ac- 
 cording to others, avffrrjfji.a fjiovow rwv opdoBo^cov teal trepl rbv 
 XjjUTTiavKTfjiov Kara iravra vyuuvovrow. On the other hand, 
 a synod pronounced against Cyril Lucar's assertion that the 
 K\KTOI alone constituted the Church of Christ (ecclesia in- 
 visibilis); vide Parthenii Dec. syn. p. 123; and cf. Dosithei 
 Conf. c. II. 1 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 C. A. p. 11 : Est ecclesia congregatio sanctorum, in qufi 
 evangelium recte docetur et recte administrantur sacramenta.
 
 THE CHURCH: ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 333 
 
 Apol. C. A. p. 144: Ecclesia non est tantum societas ex- 
 ternarum rerum ac rituum, sicut alise polities, sed principaliter 
 est societas fidei et Sp. s. in cordibus, quse tamen habet ex- 
 ternas notas, ut agnosci possit, videlicet puram evangelii doc- 
 trinam et administrationem sacramentorum consentaneam 
 evangelic Christi. Quare illi, in quibus nihil agit Christus, 
 non sunt membra Christi. 
 
 Ib. p. 148 : Non somniamus nos Platonicam civitatem, ut 
 quidam impie cavillantur, sed dicinms exsistere hanc ecclesiam, 
 videlicet vere credentes ac justos, sparsos per totum orbem. 
 Et addimus notas puram doctrinam evangelii et sacramenta. 
 Et hsec ecclesia proprie est columna veritatis. Eetinet enim 
 purum evangelium et, ut Paulus inquit, fundamentum, hoc est, 
 veram Christi cognitionem et fidem, etsi sunt in his etiam 
 multi imbecilles, qui supra fundamentum sedificant stipulas 
 perituras, hoc est, quasdam inutiles opiniones, qure tamen, quia 
 non evertunt fundamentum, turn condonantur illis turn etiam 
 emendantur. Cf. Conf. Saxon, p. 68. 
 
 II. p. 144 : Addiderunt adversarii longam declamationem, 
 quod mali non sint ab ecclesia segregandi. . . . Nos ob hanc 
 ipsam causam adjecimus octavum articulum, ne quis existi- 
 maret, nos segregare malos et hypocritas ab externa societate 
 ecclesiae. P. 146 : In decretis inquit glossa ecclesiam large 
 dictam complecti bonos et malos, it. malos nomine tantum in 
 ecclesia esse, non re, bonos vero re et nomine. (Accordingly 
 the F. C., p. 827, makes it Anabaptist error to say: non esse 
 earn veram et christ. ecclesiam, in qua peccatores reperiantur.) 
 
 Ib. p. 149 : Fortassis adversarii sic postulant definiri eccle- 
 siam, quod sit monarchia externa suprema totius orbis terrarum, 
 in qua oporteat Eomanum pontificem habere potestatem dvu- 
 Trevdvvov, de qua nemini liceat disputare aut judicare, condendi 
 articulos fidei, abolendi scripturas, quas velit, instituendi cultus 
 et sacrificia, item condendi leges, quas velit, dispensandi et 
 solvendi quibuscunque legibus velit divinis, canonicis et civi- 
 libus ; a quo imperator et reges omnes accipiant potestatem et 
 jus tenendi regna, de mandate Christi. Atque hsec definitio, 
 non ecclesiae Christi sed regni Pontificii, habet auctores non 
 solum canonistas, sed etiam Danielem cap. xi. 
 
 Conf. ffelv. ii cap. 1 7 : Oportet semper fuisse, esse et futu-
 
 334 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ram esse ecclesiam, id est e mundo evocatum vel collectum 
 coetum fidelium, sanctorum inquam omnium communionem, 
 eorum videlicet, qui deum verum in Christo servatore per 
 verbum et Spiritum sanctum vere cognoscunt et rite colunt, 
 denique omnibus bonis per Christum gratuito oblatis fide par- 
 ticipant. . . . Ulam docemus veram esse ecclesiam, in qu& 
 signa vel notae inveniuntur ecclesise verae, inpr. vero verbi 
 divini legitima vel sincera praedicatio. 
 
 Conf. Basil, art. 5 : (Germ.) We believe in one holy, Chris- 
 tian Church : that is, the fellowship of the saints, the congre- 
 gation of spiritual believers, which is holy and the bride of 
 Christ, in which all are citizens who confess truly 1 that Jesus 
 is Christ the Lamb of God . . . and approve that faith by 
 works. 
 
 Conf. Gall, art 27 : Affirmamus ex dei verbo, ecclesiam 
 esse fidelium ccetum, qui in verbo dei sequendo et pura reli- 
 gione colenda consentiunt, m qua etiam quotidie proficiunt cet. 
 Minime tamen infitiamur, quin fidelibus hypocritse et reprobi 
 multi sint permixti, sed quorum malitia ecclesise nomen delere 
 non possit. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 2 7 : Credimus unicam ecclesiam catholi- 
 cam seu universalem, quae est congregatio sancta seu ccetus 
 omnium vere fidelium christianorum, qui totam suam salutem 
 in uno Jesu Christo exspectant, sanguine ipsius abluti et per 
 spiritum ejus sanctificati atque obsignatL . . . Sancta haec 
 ecclesia certo in loco non est sita vel limitata aut ad certas 
 singularesque personas alligata, sed per totum mundum sparsa 
 atque diffusa. Art 29: Nequaquam hie de hypocritarum 
 ccetu loquimur, qui quanquam bonis in ecclesia permixti sint, 
 de ecclesia tamen non sunt, etiamsi corpore in ea sint. Notse 
 quibus vera ecclesia cognoscitur, haB snnt: si ecclesia pura 
 evangelii praedicatione, si sincera sacramentorum ex Chr. prae- 
 scripto administratione utatur, si disciplina ecclesiastica, ut 
 vitia corrigantur, obtineat. 
 
 Ris, Conf. art. 24 : Fideles et regenerati homines per totum 
 
 terrarum orbem dispersi sunt verus dei populus sive ecclesia 
 
 Jesu Ch. in terra cet. Quamvis hanc inter ecclesiam ingens 
 
 simulatorum et hypocritarum lateat et versetur multitudo, illi 
 
 1 In the Latin text of the Syntagma, it is only qui confiteutur.
 
 THE CHURCH: ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 335 
 
 tamen soli sunt vera corporis Ch. membra atque eapropter 
 beatorum promissomm haeredes cet. 
 
 Cf. Thirty-nine Artt. xix. ; Conf. Scot. art. xvi ; [ West. Conf. 
 ch. xx. 2, 3, 4]; Declar. Thor. p. 68. The definition of the 
 Church in the style of Predestinarianism runs thus : Ecclesia 
 est societas fidelium, quos deus ad vitam seternam praedesti- 
 navit. Cat. Gen. p. 480. 
 
 IV. ARMINIAN. 
 
 The Arminians agree with the Lutherans in the definition 
 of the true Church : limborch, TJi. ch. 7 ; Curcellsei Tr. de 
 eccl. p. 659. What is found in the Apol. Conf. Bern. p. 241 
 has nothing to do with the definition of the Church, and may 
 be passed over. 
 
 V. QUAKER. 
 
 The Quakers call the Church : 1. In the wider sense, the 
 community of all, of whatever nation, or race, or tongue, 
 including those who are far off and strangers to the knowledge 
 and profession of the Christian faith, who follow the divine 
 light within them, and the testimony of God in their hearts, 
 that they may be sanctified by it and delivered from evil 
 Such men have always been upon earth, even before the 
 coming of Christ; and they are still to be found among 
 Turks, and heathens, and Jews. 2. In the stricter sense, 
 the Church is to be considered a certain number of persons 
 gathered by God's Spirit, and by the testimony of some of His 
 servants raised up for that end, unto the belief of the true 
 principles and doctrines of the Christian faith, who, through 
 their hearts being united by the same love, and their under- 
 standings informed in the same truths, gather, meet, and 
 assemble together to wait upon God, to worship Him, etc. 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. x. sec. 3. 
 
 The Quakers unite with the Anabaptists and Mennonites 
 in so interpreting the life of God in the soul, and so applying 
 the words of Christ, as to refuse certain observances and duties 
 which others practise, such as some political offices, taking the
 
 336 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 oath in courts of justice, serving in war. Barclay, Apol. xv. 
 Ris, Conf. art 37; F. C. 827. 
 
 VL SOCINIANS. 
 
 The Socinians, placing all religion in the knowledge and 
 obedience of the divine will, and thinking that both these may 
 be attained without the Church, hold the idea of the Church to 
 be unimportant. They understand by it the fellowship of those 
 who adhere to the true doctrine of Christian salvation. This 
 they call the invisible Church, as embracing those who trust 
 in Christ and obey Him, and the visible as embracing those 
 who hold and profess this doctrine together (Cat. Eac. qu. 488). 
 The trusting and obeying are to them altogether internal ; 
 while the profession is external, and constitutes the visible 
 Church. But they hold the Church proper to be the visible ; 
 the word is used of the invisible only by metonymy. But 
 then the visible Church is of course something very different 
 from that of Rome. Cat. Eac. 352. 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 Outside the Church of Christ, which is led by the Spirit of 
 God into all the truth, there is for men no eternal salvation. 
 Romanists and Protestants agree in this. But their several 
 view of the Church affects the meaning of this expression. 
 Hence the proposition has a very different meaning and appli- 
 cation in the two systems. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 a. Extra ccclesiam nulla salus. 
 
 I. ROMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. v. Deer, de pecc. orig. : Ut fides nostra 
 catholica, sine qua impossibile est placere deo, . . . per- 
 maneat.
 
 THE CHURCH : ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 337 
 
 Cat. Eom. i 10. 16: Universalis etiam ob earn causam 
 dicitur (ecclesia), quod omnes, qui salutem ceternam conscqui 
 cupiunt, earn tenere et amplecti debeant, non secus ac qui 
 arcam, ne diluvio perirent, ingress! sunt. 
 
 Ib. L 10. 19 : . . . In sola del" ecclesia", neque extra earn 
 usquam, verus cultus verumque sacrificium reperitur, quod deo 
 placere ullo modo possit. 
 
 Profess, fid. Trid. : Catholica fides, extra quam nemo salvus 
 esse potest cet. 
 
 S. Klee, JcatM. Dogma*, i. S. 123 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 C. A. p. 10 : Neque vero pertinet (promissio salutis) ad 
 illos, qui sunt extra ecclesiam Christi, ubi nee verbum nee 
 sacramenta sunt, quia regnum Christi tantum cum verbo et 
 sacramentis exsistit. 
 
 Cat. maj. p. 500 sq. : Extra christianitatern, ubi evangelio 
 locus non est, neque ulla est peccatorum remissio, queniad- 
 modum nee ulla sanctificatio adesse potest. Cf. p. 503. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 17: Communionem cum ecclesia Ch. vera 
 tanti facimus, ut negemus, eos coram deo vivere posse, qui 
 cum vera dei ecclesia non communicant, sed ab ea se separant. 
 Nam ut extra arcam Noe non erat ulla salus, pereunte mundo 
 in diluvio, ita credimus extra Christum, qui se electis in 
 ecclesia fruendum proebet, nullam esse salutem certam, et 
 proinde docemus, vivere volentes non oportere separari a 
 vera Christi ecclesia. 
 
 Conf. Bdg. art. 2 8 : Credimus, quod cum . . . extra eccle- 
 siam nulla sit salus, neminem, cujuscunque ordinis aut digni- 
 tatis fuerit, sese ab ea subducere debere, ut se ipso contentus 
 separatim degat ; sed omnes pariter teneri huic se adjungere 
 eique uniri, ecclesice unitatem conservare cet. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 28 : Papisticos conventus damnamus, quod 
 pura dei veritas ab illis exsulet, in quibus etiam sacramenta 
 fidei corrupta sunt cet. Ac proinde arbitramur, omnes eos, 
 qui sese ejusmodi actionibus adjungunt et iis communicant, a 
 Chr. corpore se ipsos separare. 
 
 S. Conf. Scot. art. 16. 
 
 Y
 
 338 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 5. Infallibility of tlie Church. 
 
 t KOMAN CATHOLIC. 
 
 Catech. Horn. i. 10. 18: Quemadmodum haee una ecclesia 
 (cathoL) errare non potest in fidei ac morum discipline, tra- 
 denda, cum a Spir, s. gubernetur: ita ceteras omnes, quae 
 sibi ecclesiae nomen arrogant, ut quae diaboli spiritu du- 
 cantur, in doctrinae et morum perniciosissimis erroribus versari 
 necesse est. 
 
 (Bellarmini Eccl. milit. c. 14 : Nostra sententia est, ec- 
 clesiam absolute non posse errare nee in rebus absolute neces- 
 sariis nee in aliis, quae credenda vel facienda nobis proponit, 
 sive habeantur expresse in scripturis sive non ; et cum dici- 
 mus, ecclesiam non posse errare, id intelligimus tarn de uni- 
 versitate fidelium quam de universitate episcoporum, ita ut 
 sensus sit ejus propositionis : ecclesia non potest errare i. e. 
 id quod tenent omnes fideles tanquam de fide, necessario est 
 verum et de fide, et similiter id quod docent omnes episcopi 
 tanquam ad fidem pertinens, necessario est verum et de fide. 
 Cf. Klee, kathol. Dogm. i S. Ill ff.) 
 
 [The Encyclical of 8th Dec. 1864: Eomani pontifices et 
 concilia cecumenica a limitibus suae potestatis recesserant, jura 
 principum usurparunt, atque etiam in rebus fidei et morum 
 definiendis errarunt. The present Vatican Council makes 
 Papal Infallibility an article of faith.] 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. C. A. p. 148 : Haec ecclesia proprie est columna 
 veritatis, p. 150. Non est ad pontifices transferendum, qiiod 
 ad veram ecclesiam pertinet, quod videlicet sint columnaa 
 veritatis. 
 
 [Hutterus, Compendium locorum theologicorum loc. xvii. 
 No. 18: Ergone errare potest ecclesia? Potest. No. 19. Sic 
 statuendum est, errare non posse ecclesiam si totam ac uni- 
 versam ecclesiam sive catholicam ecclesiam respicias. .-.4 
 Cseterum quoad hanc vel illam particularem ecclesiam, imo
 
 THE CHUECH : ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 339 
 
 quoad maximam etiam ejus partem errare potest ecclesia, 
 imo enormiter erravit saepissime, id quod patet exemplo 
 ecclesise tempore diluvii, tempore Elise prophetse, tempore 
 nati Christi, tempore Arianismi per totum orientem ecclesias 
 occupantis.] 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 17 : Ecclesia dei . . . non errat, quamdiu 
 innititur petrae Christo et fundamento prophetarum et apos- 
 tolorum. 
 
 Against the infallibility of the Eomish Church, see Thirty- 
 nine Artt. art. xix. 
 
 THIED POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 The Christian Church upon earth (ecclesia militans) has, 
 according to the Protestants and the Greeks, only one invisible 
 Head, Christ. In the Eomish system there is a visible head, 
 the Eoman Bishop or Pope, as the successor of Peter ap- 
 pointed by Christ as chief Bishop and Vicar of Himself. The 
 power of the Pope in the Church has, however, not been de- 
 fined, as to its extent, in the symbols. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. EOMISH. 
 
 Condi. Florent. diffinit. (in Harduin, ix. p. 986) : Diffini- 
 mus, sanctam apostol. sedem et Eomanum pontificem in uni- 
 versum orbem tenere primatum et ipsum pontificem Eom. 
 successorem esse Petri, principis apostolorum, et verum Christi 
 vicarium totiusque ecclesise caput et omnium Christianor. 
 patrem ac doctorem exsistere cet. 
 
 In the Cone. Trid. is ascribed to the Pope (Christi in terris 
 vicario, sess. vi. ref. cap. 1) suprema in ecclesiai universal! 
 potestas (sess. xiv. cap. 7) ; the confirmation of bishops (sess. 
 xxiii. can. 8) ; the decision as to indulgences and Comnmnio 
 sub utraque (sess. xxv. de indulg., sess. xxii. super petitione 
 concess. calic.).
 
 340 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 In the Profess, fid. Trid. the Pope is called Petri aposto- 
 lorum principis successor ac I. Ch. vicarius. 
 
 Cat. Rom. L 10. 11 : Unus est ecclesise rector ac guber- 
 nator, invisibilis quidem Christus, . . . visibilis autem is, qui 
 Eomanam cathedram, Petri apostolorum principis legitimus 
 successor, tenet. Ib. i 10. 12: (De Romano pontifice) 
 fuit ilia omnium patrum ratio et sententia, hoc visibile caput 
 ad unitatem ecclesise constituendam et conservandam neces- 
 sarium fuisse. 
 
 Ib. ii. 7. 28 : Catholica ecclesia Romanum pontificem 
 maximum, quem in Ephesina synodo Cyrillus Alexandrinus 
 archiepiscopum totius orbis, terrarum patrem et patriarcham 
 appellat, semper venerata est. Cum enim in Petri apos- 
 tolorum principis cathedra sedeat, in qua usque adfixlem 
 sedisse constat, summum in eo dignitatis graduni et jurisdio- 
 tionis amplitudinem, non quidem ullis synodicis aut uliis 
 humanis constitutionibus sed divinitus datam agnoscit. Quam- 
 obrem omnium fidelium et episcoporum ceterorumque an- 
 tistitum, quocunque illi munere et potestate prsediti sint, pater 
 ac moderator universali ecclesia? ut Petri successor Christique 
 verus et legitimus vicarius in terris prsesidet. 
 
 II. GREEK AND PROTESTANT. 
 
 Conf. ortJwd. p. 138 sq. : AiBaaKofieda, TTW? fiovos 6 Xp^cTo? 
 eivat Ke<j>a\7) T??S KK\T)<Tia<; Kara rqv 8i$acnca\iav TOV airo<rTo\ov 
 (Eph. v. 32). 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. xxiii. p. 159 : "Ecrri Se roiavrrj 
 K<f)a\T) TT)? KadoXiicijs eKK\r)<ria<; 6 Kvpiu? 'Itja-ovf Xpi<no<;, 05 
 e<TTiv 77 K(f>a\r) TrdvToW) ef ov irav TO trwytta a 
 975 tc<pa\fj<i 5wo"775 8ta Travrot crv^rj ravrrj ical 17 e/ 
 
 real Siev6vvofj.vr) VTTO T0iavrr]<j adavdrov Kal 
 Ke<f>a\r)<>, Kal ovSeva rwv iro\fiioiv <J30/3ovfJ,evr}. KUV 
 fj.vpia Ka/ca ravrrj eTravatrralt], Travrcov avTrj Trepiyiverat Svvdfiei 
 T?}? eaur?)? Qeias /ce^>a\^<?. Previously : ov&eTrore TjKovaOrj, Trapa 
 TTJ K,a6o\. eKK\T)<rta avOputirov 6vt)Tov Kal f&p&UQ d/j,apTi'ai$ 
 cvoxpv K(f>a\r]v XeyeaBai, TTJS e/c/cX^o-ta?. As to the opinion 
 of the Greeks concerning the primacy of the Roman bishop, 
 cf. Heinecc. ii. 371 ff. ; s. Philaret, n. 16.
 
 THE CHURCH : ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 341 
 
 In the Greek symbols the Pope is not mentioned. The 
 four patriarchs have equal rank. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 312: Quod papa non sit jure divino sen. 
 secundum verbum dei caput totius christianitatis (hoc enim 
 nomen uni et soli Jesu Christo debetur), sed tantum episcopus 
 et pastor ecclesise, quce est Komse, et eorum qui voluntarie et 
 sponte vel per humanam creaturam, id est politicum magis- 
 tratum, se ad eum conferunt, . . . vetera concilia et setas 
 Cypriani ostendunt. 
 
 Ib. p. 313: Hinc sequitur, omnia, quse papa ex tarn arro- 
 gante, temeraria, mendace, blasphema et furto accepta" potestate 
 suscepit et fecit et adhuc facit, fuisse et esse mere diabolica 
 acta et instituta (excepta politici regni administratione, ubi 
 deus etiam saepe per tyrannos et perfidos nebulones populo 
 alicubi benefacit) ad perditionem totius sanctse ecclesise catho- 
 licse seu christianse (quantum in ipso est) et ad destructionem 
 primi et prsecipui articuli de redemtione facta per Jesum 
 Christum. 
 
 Ib. p. 314: Ecclesia nunquam melius gubernari et conser- 
 vari potest, quam si omnes sub uno capite, quod est Christus, 
 vivamus. 
 
 Ib. p. 340 (tr. de potestate et primatu papse) : Eom. 
 pontifex arrogat sibi, quod jure div. sit supra omnes epis- 
 copos et pastores ; deinde addit etiam, quod jure div. habeat 
 utrumque gladium, h. e. auctoritatem etiam regna confer- 
 endi et transferendi ; et tertio dicit, quod haec credere sit 
 de necessitate salutis. Et propter has causas Eom. episcopus 
 vocat se vicarium Christi in terris. Hos tres articulos 
 sentimus falsos, impios, tyrannicos et perniciosos ecclesite 
 esse. 
 
 Cf. also Con/. Wirtemb. p. 131 sq. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 27: Caput est, quod in corpore emi- 
 nentiam habet et unde vitam haurit, cujus spiritu regitur in 
 omnibus, unde et incrementa et ut crescat habet. Unicum 
 item est corporis caput et cum corpore habet congruentiam. 
 Ergo ecclesia non potest ullum aliud habere caput quam 
 Christum. Nam ut ecclesia corpus est spirituale, ita caput 
 habeat sibi congruens spirituale utique oportet. Nee alio 
 potest regi spiritu, quam Christi. Non probamus ergo doc-
 
 342 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 trinam cleri Eomani, facientis suum ilium Eom. pontificem 
 catholicae in terris ecclesiae militantis pastorem universalem et 
 caput summum, adeoque verum Christi vicarium, qui habeat 
 in ecclesia plenitudinem, ut vocant, potestatis et dominium 
 supremum. Docemus enim, Christum dominum esse et man- 
 ere unicum pastorem universalem, summum item pontificem 
 coram deo patre, ac in ecclesia ipsum omnia pontificis vel 
 pastoris obire munia ad finem usque seculi, ideoque nullo in- 
 digere vicario, qui absentis est. Christus vero praesens est 
 ecclesiae et caput vivificum. 
 
 Confess. Angl. p. 91 : Credimus, ecclesiam esse regnum, 
 esse corpus Christi, ejus regni Christum solum esse principem, 
 ejus corporis Christum solum esse caput cet. . . . Caput ec- 
 clesiae totius aut universalem episcopum non magis aut ilium 
 (Roman, episcopum), aut alium quemvis mortalem esse posse, 
 quam sponsum, quam lucem, quam salutem, quam vitam ec- 
 clesiae : haec enim esse Christi unius privilegia et nomina et 
 illi uni proprie atque unice convenire. 
 
 See Conf. Gall art. 30 ; Bdg. art. 29 ; Declar. Thorun. 
 p. 70 ; and limborch, Theol. chr. vii. 10. 
 
 Apologia Conf. Aug. S. 149 and 208. 
 
 Art. Smalc. S. 347 : Constat, Eomanos pontifices cum suis 
 membris defendere impiam doctrinam et impios cultus. Ac 
 plane notae Antichristi competunt in regnum papas et sua 
 membra. Paulus enim ad Thessalonicenses describens Anti- 
 christum, vocat eum adversarium Christi, extollentem se super 
 omne, quod dicitur aut colitur Deus, sedentem in templo 
 Dei, tanquam Deum. Loquitur igitur de aliquo regnante in 
 ecclesia", non de regibus ethnicis : et hunc vocat adversarium 
 Christi, quia doctrinam pugnantem cum evangelic excogita- 
 turus sit, et is arrogabit sibi auctoritatem divinam. Primum 
 autem constat, papam regnare in ecclesia", et praetextu ecclesi- 
 .asticse auctoritatis et ministerii sibi hoc regnum constituisse. 
 . . Deinde doctrina papae multipliciter pugnat cum evan- 
 gelio, et arrogat sibi papa auctoritatem divinam tripliciter : 
 primum quia . . ., secundo quia . . ., tertio quia . . . Hoc 
 autem est se Deum facere, nolle ab ecclesiS, aut ab ullo 
 judicari. . . . Haec quum ita sint, cavere omnes Christiani 
 debent, ne fiant participes impiae doctrinae, blasphemiarum
 
 THE CHUECH : ITS IDEA AND AUTHORITY. 343 
 
 et injustse crudelitatis papSB. Ideo papam cum suis membris, 
 tanquam regmirn Antichristi, deserere et exsecrari debent. 
 
 Cf. Confessio et expositio brevis et simplex sincerce rel. 
 christ. cap. xi. in August!, S. 28; Confessio Bohcemica, art. 
 8; Niemeyer, S. 798; Confessio Sigismundi, c. xiii. ; Nie- 
 meyer, S. 649.
 
 XX. 
 
 THE MINISTEY, 
 
 THAT the Church might exert its energies for the advantage 
 of its members, certain special organs, chosen from the body 
 of Christians, are necessary : the ministri ecclcsice, or an ap- 
 pointed ministerial function. With the exception of the 
 Quakers and Anabaptists, all Christian communities have 
 been agreed in this. But a divergence of sentiment has 
 obtained as to the relation of the ministerial order to the 
 general body of Christians. The Protestants ascribe to that 
 order a distinction from other believers, grounded only on the 
 function of their office ; but the Eomish Church vindicates for 
 its priesthood an indelible character, imparted in ordination, 
 which for ever separates them from the laity. It sharply 
 opposes the clergy as the governing, to the laity as the 
 governed body. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. QUAKER. 
 
 As by the light or gift of God all true knowledge in things 
 spiritual is received and revealed, so by the same, as it is 
 manifested and received in the heart, by the strength and 
 power thereof, every true minister of the gospel is ordained, 
 prepared, and supplied in the work of the ministry ; and by 
 the leading, moving, and drawing hereof ought every evangelist 
 and Christian pastor to be led and ordered in his labour and 
 
 844
 
 THE MINISTRY. 345 
 
 work of the gospel, "both as to the place where, as to the 
 persons to whom, and as to the time wherein, he is to be 
 minister. Moreover, they who have this authority may and 
 ought to preach the gospel, though without human commis- 
 sion or literature ; as, on the other hand, they who want the 
 authority of the divine gift, however learned, or authorized by 
 the commission of men or churches, are to be esteemed but as 
 deceivers, and not true ministers of the gospel. Also, they 
 who have received this holy and unspotted gift, as they have 
 freely received it, so are they freely to give it without hire or 
 bargaining, far less to use it as a trade to get money by ; yet 
 if God hath called any one from their employment or trades 
 by which they acquire their livelihood, it may be lawful for 
 such, according to the liberty which they feel given them in 
 the Lord, to receive such temporals (to wit, what may be 
 needful for them for meat or clothing) as are given them 
 freely and cordially by those to whom they have communi- 
 cated spirituals. 
 
 As to the first part of the objection, viz., that I seem to 
 make no distinction between the minister and the people, 
 I answer, if it is understood of a liberty to speak or pro- 
 phesy by the Spirit, I say all may do that, when moved 
 thereunto, as above is shown. But we do believe and affirm 
 that some are more particularly called to the work of the 
 ministry, and therefore are fitted of the Lord for that purpose ; 
 whose work is more constantly and particularly to instruct, 
 exhort, admonish, oversee, and watch over their brethren ; and 
 that as there is something more incumbent upon them in that 
 respect than upon every common believer, so also, as in that 
 relation, there is due to them from the flock such obedience 
 and subjection as is mentioned in these testimonies of the 
 Scripture: Heb. xiii. 17; 1 Thess. v. 12, 13 ; 1 Tim. v. 17 ; 
 1 Pet. v. 5. Also, besides those who are particularly called 
 to the ministry, and constant labour in the word and doctrine, 
 there are also the elders, who, though they be not moved to a 
 frequent testimony by way of declaration in words, yet, as 
 such are grown up in the experience of the blessed work of 
 truth in their hearts, they watch over and privately admonish 
 the young, take care for the widows, the poor and fatherless,
 
 346 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 and look that nothing be wanting, but that peace, love, unity, 
 concord, and soundness be preserved in the Church of Christ ; 
 and this answers to the 'deacons mentioned, Acts vi 
 
 That which we oppose is the distinction of laity and clergy, 
 which in the Scripture is not to be found, whereby none are 
 admitted into the work of the ministry but such as are edu- 
 cated at schools on purpose, and instructed in logic, philo- 
 sophy, etc., and so are at their apprenticeship to learn the art 
 and trade of preaching, even as a man learns any other art, 
 whereby all other honest mechanic men who have not got this 
 heathenish art are excluded from having this privilege. 
 
 Seeing male and female are one in Christ Jesus, and that 
 He gives His Spirit no less to one than to the other, when God 
 moveth by His Spirit in a woman, we judge it no ways unlaw- 
 ful for her to preach in the assemblies of God's people. 
 
 Accordingly, the fundamental principle of the Quakers is, 
 that speaking in their assemblies, the end of which is edifica- 
 tion, is not and cannot be limited to any special order or office. 
 Hence the preacher in their meetings is only a provision or 
 surrogate for the case in which no one in the congregation is 
 moved by the Spirit. 
 
 II. ROMISH AND PROTESTANT. 
 
 The relation of the clergy to the laity has been laid down 
 in no one precise statement of the Romish symbols (it is 
 hinted only in Cat. Rom. ii. 7. 24) ; but it may without diffi- 
 culty be gathered from what will be adduced below as to 
 the priesthood and hierarchy, and from what has been adduced 
 on the sacrament of orders. The works of the theologians 
 and of the writers on ecclesiastical law plainly distinguish 
 between the clerical order and the people. Nor do the Pro- 
 testant symbols enter fully into the matter. The avoidance 
 of the terms clcrici and laid, however, teaches that the Re- 
 formers were averse to it (Calvin, Inst. iv. 4. 9 ; vid. Bellar- 
 mine, De cler. i I 1 ) ; and the proposition that all the power of 
 
 1 Prima inter nos et haereticos qusestio nascitnr, rectene, an secus quidam 
 inter Christianos clerici, quidam laici nominentur. Lutherani euim et Calvin-
 
 THE MINISTRY. 347 
 
 the ministry flows from the Church primarily, that is, from the 
 fellowship of believers, is not reconcilable with the division 
 of the Church into two essentially different classes. Finally, 
 where the communio sub und is in question, the Eomish doc- 
 trine is contradicted. Apol. A. C. p. 235. 
 
 SECOND POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 In the Roman and Greek Churches the ministerial office is 
 regarded as, in its essential character, a true priesthood. But 
 as various classes of ecclesiastical officers are subordinated to 
 the priests, so also among the priests themselves there is, jure 
 divino, a spiritual distinction of rank and office ; that is, there 
 exists in the Romish Church a hierarchy, instituted by Christ 
 Himself, and continued in unbroken succession, which consists 
 of bishops, priests, and deacons. The evangelical Church not 
 only rejects the priestly character of the ministers of the 
 Church having no sacrifice, needing therefore no priests 
 but attributes to all ministers, jure divino, equal official status. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 For the sake of better order than has been introduced into the 
 evangelical Church, a distinction of rank and function and ordination 
 has almost everywhere been reserved for the higher ministry, the 
 bishops, general superintendents, etc. But this ordinance exists only 
 jure humano. It affects not so much the spiritual office itself, as the 
 supervision of the clergy. The general superintendent has, as minister 
 ecclesiae, no more comprehensive authority than the parochial pastor ; 
 hence, in the elevation of a deacon to a pastorate, or of a pastor to 
 the superintendency, there is no new consecration. The English 
 Episcopal Church approximates in this to the Eomish constitution ; it 
 has not only three separate orders, but also for each a special conse- 
 
 istse, tametsi minime negant, quod ad rem attinet, ministerium verbi et sacra- 
 mentontm non ex sequo ad omnes pertinere, et habent ipsi quoque suos quosdam 
 ministros et pastores, . . . tamen quod eorum contentiones et schismata ab 
 odio clericorum et laicorum favore initium duxerint, et vocabulum cleri non 
 obscure excellentiam quandam ac dignitatem prse se ferre videatur, nullo modo 
 ferunt, ut ministri ecclesiastic! clerici, ceteri laici appellentur.
 
 348 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 cration, and a special and exclusive circle of official functions. The 
 English Articles, however, have nothing OH this point. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. ROMISH AND GREEK. 
 
 Concil Trid. sess. xxiii. cap. 1 : Sacrificium et sacerdotium 
 del ordinatione conjuncta sunt, ut utrumque in omni lege ex- 
 stiterit. Cum igitur in N. T. sanctum eucharistiae sacrificium 
 visibile ex domini institutione catholica ecclesia acceperit, 
 fateri etiam oportet, in ea novum esse visibile et externum 
 sacerdotium. Hoc autem ab eodem domino institutum esse 
 atque apostolis eorumque successoribus in sacerdotio potes- 
 tatem traditam consecrandi, offerendi et ministrandi corpus et 
 sanguinem ejus nee non et peccata dimittendi et retinendi, 
 sacrse literce ostendunt et catholicae eccL traditio semper 
 docuit. Cf. can. 1. 
 
 76. cap. 2 : Cum autem divina res sit tarn sancti sacerdotii 
 ministerium, consentaneum fuit, quo dignius et majori cum 
 veneratione exereeri potest, ut in ecclesiae ordinatissima dis- 
 positione plures et diversi essent ministrorum ordines, qui 
 sacerdotio ex officio deservirent, et ita distributi, ut, qui jam 
 clericali tonsuni insigniti essent, per minores ad majores 
 adscenderent. Nam non solum de sacerdotibus, sed et de 
 diaconis sacne litterse apertam mentionem faciunt, et qufe 
 maxime in illorum ordinatione attendenda sunt, gravissimis 
 verbis docent. Et ab ipso ecclesia} initio sequentium ordinum 
 nomina atque uniuscujusque eonim propria ministeria, sub- 
 diaconi scilicet, acoluthi, exorcistae, lectoris et ostiarii, in usu 
 fuisse cognoscuntur, quamvis non pari gradu. Nam sub- 
 diaconatus ad majores ordines a patribus et sacris conciliis 
 refertur, in quibus et de aliis inferioribus frequentissime legi- 
 mus. Can. 6 : Si quis dixerit, in ecclesiH, catholica non esse 
 hierarchiam divina ordinatione institutam, quse constat ex 
 episcopis, presbyteris et ministris : anathema sit 
 
 Cat. Horn. ii. 7. 26 : Tametsi unus est ordo sacerdotalis, 
 varios tamen dignitatis et potestatis gradus habet Primus 
 est eorum, qui sacerdotes simpliciter vocantur. Secundus est 
 episcoporum, qui singulis episcopatibus praspositi sunt, ut non
 
 THE MINISTRY. 349 
 
 solum ceteros ecclesise ministros, sed fidelem populum regant 
 et eorum saluti summa cum vigilantia et cura prospiciant. . . . 
 Tertius gradus est archiepiscoporum, qui pluribus episcopis 
 preesunt, qui metropolitani etiam vocantur, quod illarum iirbium 
 antistites sint, quse tanquam matres habeantur illius provincise. 
 Quare superiorem, quam episcopi, locum et ampliorem potes- 
 tatem habent, tametsi ab episcopis ordinatione nil differunt. 
 In quarto gradu patriarchse collocantur, id est primi supremique 
 patres. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxiii. cap. 4 : S. synodus declarat, prseter 
 ceteros ecclesiasticos gradus episcopos, qui in apostolorum 
 locum successerunt, ad hunc hierarchicum ordinem prsecipue 
 pertinere et positos a Spiritu s. regere ecclesiam dei, eosque 
 presbyteris superiores esse ac sacramentum confirmations con- 
 ferre, ministros ecclesise ordinare atque alia pleraque peragere 
 ipsos posse, quarum functionum potestatem reliqui inferioris 
 ordinis nullam habent. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 173 : 'H lepoxrvvrj OTTOV elvat ftva-Tijpiov, 
 rot9 aTroaroXot? airo rov Xpta-rov, KOL Sta TT}<? 
 TUV ^eipwv avrwv fte%pt TT)? crij/jiepov ryiverai 17 
 , Sia&e^afjievuv r<av (airoa'rokwv) eTricncoTrwv 
 777)05 8idSoa-iv TUIV Oeitov fivffTijpicav Kal Biarcoviav TTJ 
 avdputTrcav. 
 
 Ib. p. 176 : 'H tepcoffvvr} Trepifcparei et? Trjv eavrrjv T^? oXou? 
 
 /3a6fjLovs' *[j,e 0X0^ TouTO 7rp7ret Kara rrjv rdt;iv va 
 olov dvayvcaarr] 1 ;, fyd\Ti]<j ) \a/J,7raSdpio<j, uTroSta/coi/o?, 
 Cf. Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. XL p. 108 sq. 
 
 Metroph. Critop. Conf. c. xi. p. 110 : 'O eVtWoTro? &vvarai, 
 TO. TWV Trpea-fivrepcov, e^o^ov Si aurot? epyov 17 %eipoTovia raiv 
 v<j> auroi5 rd^ecov. Ovroi (JLCV 'yap ^eiporovovvrat, VTTO rpicav 
 eTTia-KOTTcov TOv\d i ^LO'TOV' ea<7TO? Se TOVTCOV ra? vTroBeeaTepas 
 T|et9, ffvfjt,7rap6vr(i)v aura) irpeaftvrepwv re Kal SiaKovwv dSto- 
 piaTwv. Against the Protestant doctrine as to the equality of 
 ministers, s. Dosithei Confess, c. 10. 
 
 * 
 
 II PROTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 201 : Sacerdotium intelligunt adversarii non 
 de ministerio verbi et sacramentorum aliis porrigendorum, sed
 
 350 CONFESSIONS OF CHEISTENDOM. 
 
 intelL de sacrificio, quasi oporteat esse in N. T. sacerdotium 
 simile levitico, quod pro populo sacrificet et mereatur aliis 
 remissionem peccatorum. Nos docemus, sacrificium Ch. mori- 
 entis in cruce satis fuisse cet. Ideo sacerdotes vocantur non 
 ad ulla sacrificia velut in lege pro populo facienda, . . . sed 
 ad docendum evang. et sacramenta porrigenda populo. Nee 
 habemus nos aliud sacerdotium, simile levitico. Cf. p. 265, 
 and Conf. Wirtenib. p, 119. 
 
 Conf. Hdv. ii cap. 18 : Diversissima inter se sunt sacer- 
 dotium et ministerium. Illud enim commune est christianis 
 omnibus, hoc non item. Nee e medio sustulimus ecclesise 
 ministerium, quando repudiavimus ex ecclesia Christi sacer- 
 dotium papisticum. ... In Novo Testam. Christi non est 
 amplius tale sacerdotium, quale fuit in populo veteri, quod 
 unctionem habuit externam, vestes sacras et caerimonias plu- 
 rimas, quae typi fuerunt Christi, qui ilia omnia veniens et 
 adimplens abrogavit. Manet autem ipse solus sacerdos in 
 seternum, cui ne quid derogemus, nemini inter ministros sacer- 
 dotis vocabulum communicamus. Ipse enim dominus noster 
 non ordinavit ullos in ecclesia Novi Testam. sacerdotes, qui 
 accepta potestate a suffraganeo offerant quotidie hostiam, ipsam 
 inquam carnem et ipsum sanguinem domini pro vivis et mor- 
 tuis, sed qui doceant et sacramenta administrent. 
 
 Art. Sm. p. 314: Ecclesia nunquam melius gubernari et 
 conservari potest, quam si omnes sub uno capite, quod est 
 Christus, vivamus et episcopi omnes pares officio, licet dispares 
 sint quoad dona, sumrnS, cum dfligentia cet. C p. 352. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 18 : Data est omnibus in ecclesia mini- 
 stris una et sequalis potestas sive functio. . . . Interea propter 
 ordinem servandum unus aut certus aliquis ministrorum coetum 
 convocavit et in ccetu res consultandas proposuit, sententias 
 item aliorum collegia denique ne qua oriretur confusio, pro 
 virilicavit. 
 
 Conf. Gall. art. 30 : Credimus omnes veros pastores, ubi- 
 cunque locorum collocati fuerint, eadem et sequali inter se 
 potestate esse prseditos sub unico illo capite summoque et solo 
 universali episcopo Jesu Christo. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 31: Quantum attinet divini verbi ministros, 
 ubicunque locorum sint, eandem illi potestatem et auctoritatem
 
 THE MINISTRY. 351 
 
 habent, ut qui omnes sint Christ! unici illius episcopi univer- 
 salis unicique capitis ecclesise ministri. 
 
 Conf. Remonstr. xxi. 7 : Cum episcoporum et presbyterorum 
 omnium mtinus atque officium sit juxta propositam ab apostolis 
 formam ecclesias docere ac regere, manifestum satis esse vide- 
 tur, aliis in alios imperium ac potestatem proprie dictarn nullo 
 jure div. competere. Neque idcirco tamen omnino impro- 
 bamus . . . gradus illos docentium ac regentium, qui . . . ordinis 
 et decori causs& jam olim instituti sunt et passim hactenus 
 obtinent, si modo ii tandem non degenerent in tyrannidem cet* 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The bishops, on Romish principles, constitute, when they are assem- 
 bled under their Primus the Pope in an (Ecumenical Council, the 
 ecclesia reprcesentans, to which belongs an infallible decision as to the 
 faith and morals of the Church out of the word of God. In the Pro- 
 testant symbols the synodal constitution is only touched (J.. Sm. p. 
 351 ; Conf. Helv. ii. c. 18 ; Eng. Art. xxi.) ; yet the idea of a general 
 council is not foreign to Protestantism, though for infallible as such 
 it could not be held, Conf. Wirt. p. 134. On the foregoing premisses, 
 however, all ministers without exception would be eligible for election. 
 
 THIED POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 All Christian communities, which hold a separated order of 
 ministry as necessary, require also (the Socinians excepted) a 
 special call on the part of each individual. The prerogative 
 of this call Protestants generally assign to the Church ; while 
 the Eomanists and Greeks vindicate it lege divind for the epis- 
 copate, that is, in the final resort, for the head of the Church, 
 from whom all ecclesiastical jurisdiction flows. (The possible 
 committal of this right to an ecclesiastical selection, or to the 
 civil power, cannot be entered upon here, as the symbols have 
 not decided it.) 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. EOMISH. 
 
 Concil. Trid. sess. xxiii. cap. 4 : Docet s. synodus, in ordi- 
 natione episcoporum, sacerdotum et ceterorurn ordinum nee
 
 352 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 populi nec cujusvis secularis potestatis et magistrates consen- 
 sum sive vocationem sive auctoritatem ita requiri, ut sine ea 
 irrita sit ordinatio ; quin potius decernit, eos, qui tantummodo 
 a populo aut seculari potestate ac magistratu vocati et instituti 
 ad hsec ministeria exercenda ascendunt, . . . non ecclesiae 
 ministros, sed fures et latrones per ostium non ingressos 
 habendos esse. 
 
 (Bellarmin, De cleric, c. 2 : Exsistit inter nos et adversaries 
 controversia, cui potissimuni -jus sit in ecclesia episcopos 
 creandi, id est eligendi, vocandi, atque initiandi. . . . Sunt 
 autem tres de hac tota qusestione sententiae. . . . Altera sen- 
 tentia est M. Lutheri, J. Calvini, Matthise Illyrici, Jo. Brentii, 
 Mart. Chemnicii aliorumque hujus temporis sectariorum, qui 
 electionem et vocationem jure divino ad ecclesiam universam, 
 hoc est ad clerum et populum spectare volunt, ita prorstis ut 
 sine populi consensu ac suffragio nemo legitime electus aut 
 vocatus ad episcopatum habeatur. Contra autem doctores 
 catholici summa consensione docent, jus episcopos ordinandi 
 ac vocandi ad plebem nullo modo pertinere posse, jus autem 
 eligendi fuisse aliquando et aliquo modo penes populum, sed 
 pontificum concessione vel conniventia, non lege divina. Ex 
 quo nos longe verius colligemus, nullam esse apud hsereticos 
 veram ordinationem, nullam vocationem, nullam electionem, 
 proinde nullos episcopos, nullam ecclesiam. 
 
 The Greek Confessions say nothing on this point; but 
 Jeremias shows from the decrees of councils that the people 
 have no part in the choice and vocation of the clergy. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 353 (de potestate et primatu papse) : Ubicunque 
 est ecclesia, ibi est jus administrandi evangelii Quare necesse 
 est, ecclesiam retinere jus vocandi, eligendi et ordinandi mini- 
 stros. Et hoc jus est donum proprie datum ecclesiae, quod 
 nulla humana auctoritas ecclesias eripere potest. . . . Idque 
 etiam communissima ecclesiaB consuetudo testatur. Nam olim 
 populus eligebat pastores et episcopos cet 
 
 Conf. Hdv. ii cap. 18: Vocentur et eligantur electione 
 ^ecclesiastica et legitima ministri ecclesiaa, i e. eligantur reli-
 
 THE MINISTRY. 353 
 
 giose ab ecclesia vel ad hoc deputatis ab ecclesia, ordine 
 justo cet. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 31 : Credimus, ministros divini verbi, seni- 
 ores et diaconos ad functiones suas legitima ecclesiae electione 
 . . . eligi debere. 
 
 Cf. Eng. Art. xxiii. 
 
 III. SOCINIAN. 
 
 Catech. Eacov. qu. 505: Nonne ii, qui decent in ecclesia" et 
 ordini tuendo et conservando invigilant, ut singulari aliqua 
 ratione mittantur, opus habent ? Nullo modo. Etenina illi 
 nunc nullam novam nee antea inauditam doctrinam afferunt. 
 Sed apostolicam antiquitus ab omnibus exceptam tantum 
 proponunt, inculcant, utque secundum earn vitam instituant 
 homines hortantur. Unde etiam apostolus describens diserte 
 omnia, quse ad constituendas personas ejusmodi pertinent, 
 nullam missionis facit mentionem. Nihilominus tamen, cum 
 personse ejusmodi ex prsescripto apostolicae doctrinse consti- 
 tuuntur et his duabus rebus prsestant, vitse innocentia et ad 
 docendum aptitudine, propter ejusmodi constitutionem merito 
 apud omnes auctoritatem justam invenire debent. 
 
 FOUKTH POINT OF DIVEEGENCK 
 
 According to the fundamental principle of all Christian 
 bodies, the ministry thus called are ordained to their office by 
 imposition of hands and prayer. Differences of view obtain 
 only : 1. As to the dignity of this usage ; the Eomish Church 
 holding ordination as a sacrament, which impresses an indelible 
 character, while Protestants regard it only as an observance 
 continued from the apostles. 2. As to the person whose 
 office it is to ordain ; the Eomanists and Greeks assigning that 
 prerogative to the bishops alone, while Protestants hold every 
 minister competent and justified in imparting consecration to 
 others, most individual Protestant churches attaching the office 
 of ordination to special superior functionaries only for the sake 
 of order. Vide No. XVIII. | ^ 
 
 z
 
 354 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 FIFTH POINT OF DIVERGENCE. 
 
 The Roman Catholic Church has imposed on consecrated 
 priests the law of perpetual celibacy ; the Protestant Church 
 leaves marriage free to its ministers. The Greek Church 
 tolerates no married bishops, but allows other clergy to marry 
 under certain restrictions. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I ROMISH. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxiv. Sacram. matrimon. can. 9 : Si quis 
 dixerit, clericos in sacris ordinibus constitutes vel regulares 
 castitatem solemniter professes posse matrimonium contrahere 
 contractumque validum esse, non obstante lege ecclesiastica 
 vel voto, et oppositum nil aliud esse, quam damnare matri- 
 monium; posseque omnes contrahere matrimonium, qui non 
 sentiunt se castitatis, etiamsi earn voverint, habere donum : 
 anathema sit, cum deus id recte petentibus non deneget nee 
 patiatur nos supra id, quod possumus, tentari. 
 
 Confut. A. C. p. 94 : Quod memorant inter abusus cseliba- 
 tum cleri, et quo pacto sacerdotes eorum uxdres ducant et 
 alios ducere suadeant, res profecto est admiratione digna, quod 
 cselibatum sacerdotalem abusum vocent, cum potius e diverso 
 violatio cselibatus et illicitus ad conjugium transitus in sacer- 
 dotibus pessimus abusus dici mereatur. Etenim sacerdotes 
 nunquam debere uxores ducere, testatur Aurelius in concilio 
 2 Carthaginiensi, ubi inquit : quia sic docucrunt apostoli ex- 
 emplo et ipsa servavit antiquitas, nos quoque custodiamus. 
 Et paulo ante talis legitur canon : placet, ut episcopi, presby- 
 teri -et diaconi vel qui sacramenta contrectant pudicitise cus- 
 todes ab uxoribus se abstineant. Ex quibus verbis liquet, ab 
 apostolis receptam esse hanc traditionem, non ab ecclesia novi- 
 ter inventam. . . . Ad hsec sacerdotes veteris legis tempore officii 
 et ministerii sui in templo separabantur ab uxoribus. Cum 
 autem sacerdos novae legis semper debeat esse in ministerio, 
 sequitur, semper eum debere continere. Amplius, conjuges
 
 THE MINISTEY. 355 
 
 non debent se fraudare officio conjugali, nisi ad tempus (1 Cor. 
 viL), ut vacent orationi. Cum ergo sacerdos semper debeat 
 orare, semper debet continere. . . . Continentia sacerdotalis cum 
 sit a conciliis, a pontificibus praecepta et a deo revelata, proprio 
 voto a sacerdote deo promissa, non est rejicienda. Nam hanc 
 exigit sacrificii, quod tractant, excellentia, orationis frequentia, 
 libertas et puritas spiritus, ut curent, quomodo deo placeant, 
 juxta S. Pauli doctrinam. . . . Habet sacerdos medium, ut 
 neque uratur neque nubat, sed per gratiam dei contineat, quam 
 oratione devota et castigatione carnis, jejuniis et vigiliis a deo 
 impetret. Amplius, dum aiunt, Christum docuisse, non omnes 
 homines ad caelibatum idoneos esse, hoc quidem verum, ideo- 
 que nee omnes idonei sunt ad sacerdotium, sed sacerdos oret, 
 et poterit capere verbum Christi de continentia. 
 
 Comp. Eck, Loci, c. 18; Bellarmin, De cleric, c. 18-22; 
 Eichhorn, Kir chenr edit, i. S. 516 ff. 
 
 II. PKOTESTAXT. 
 
 A. C. p. 23 : Cum exstet mandatum dei, cum mos ecclesias 
 notus sit, cum impurus caelibatus plurima pariat scandala, 
 adulteria et alia scelera, digna animadversione boni magis- 
 tratus, tamen mirum est, nulla in re majorem exerceri ssevi- 
 tiam, quam adversus conjugium sacerdotum. Deus prsecepit 
 honore afficere conjugium. Leges in omnibus rebus publicis 
 bene constitutis etiam apud ethnicos maximis honoribus orna- 
 verunt. At nunc capitalibus pcenis excruciantur, et quidem 
 sacerdotes, contra canonum voluntatem, nullam aliam ob 
 causam, nisi propter conjugium. Paulus vocat doctrinam dae- 
 moniorum, quae prohibet conjugium 1 Tim. iv. 3. Id facile 
 nunc intelligi potest, cum talibus suppliciis prohibitio conjugii 
 defenditur. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 237: Non legem de coelibatu, quam defen- 
 dunt adversarii, ideo non possumus approbare, quia cum jure 
 divino et naturali pugnat et ab ipsis canonibus conciliorum 
 dissentit, et constat, superstitiosam et periculosam esse. Parit 
 enim infinita scandala, peccata et corruptelam publicorum 
 morum. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 334: Quod conjugium prohibuerunt et divinum
 
 356 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ordinem sacerdotum perpetuo caelibatu onerarunt, malitiose 
 sine omni honesta causa 1 fecerunt, et in eo anticliristi, tyran- 
 norum et pessimorum nebulonum opus exercuerunt ac causam 
 prsebuerunt multis horrendis, abominandis, innumeris peccatis 
 tetrarum libidinum, in quibus adhuc volutantur. . . . Quare 
 ipsornm spurco cselibatui assentire nolumus, nee etiam ilium 
 feremus, sed conjugium liberum habere volumus, sicut deus 
 illud ipse ordinavit et constituit, cujus opus nee rescindere 
 nee destruere nee impedire volumus. 
 
 Comp. Conf. Wirtemb. p. 120 sq. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 29 : Qui coelitus donum habent casli- 
 batus, ita ut ex corde vel toto animo puri sint ac continentes 
 nee urantur graviter, serviant in e& vocatione domino, donee 
 senserint se divino munere prseditos, et ne efferant se ceteris : 
 sed serviant domino assidue, in simplicitate et humilitate. 
 Aptiores autem hi sunt curandis rebus divinis, quam qui pri- 
 vatis familise negotiis distrahuntur. Quod si ademto rursus 
 dono ustionent senserint durabilem, meminerint verbi aposto- 
 lici : melius esse nubere, quam uri. 
 
 Art. Angl. 32 : Episcopis, presbyteris et diaconis nullo 
 mandate divino praeceptum est, ut aut caelibatum voveant aut 
 a matrimonio abstineant. licet igitur etiam illis ut ceteris 
 omnibus christianis, ubi hoc ad pietatem magis facere judica- 
 verint, pro suo arbitratu matrinionium contrahere. Cf. Conf. 
 Angl. p. 92. 
 
 S. Calvin, Institut. iv. 12. 23 sq. 
 
 III. GREEK. 
 
 MetropL Critop. Conf. c. 11, p. Ill : Uao-at? rat? rd^eat 
 (of the ministry) 7r\r)v TWV eVto-/ro7r&>i> arvyKe^caprjrai 6 70/^05, 
 &>? eru^e Be, d\\a fjwa \6yov Trdvv 4iraiverov. Hpwrov 
 ev 01 j3ov\6/j,evoi yafj,eiv, irpo T^<? ^eiporovla<; rovro TTOIOVCTIV. 
 Aevrepov, et Tivo$ ryuvr) <f>6r) TO %rjv eKfierp^aaaa, el /j,ev irpecr- 
 /Sure/305 r) SiaKovos eartv 6 . ^rjpeua-a^ /cat /SouXerat Sevrepa 
 l Trpocro/iiX^orat, Travel T^? rS)v /AVffTijpifDV lepovpyias. 
 Be novov et? TTapajJivdiav ... 6 fiev rrjv yuera rwv 7rpe<r- 
 ) o Se rrjv //.era rwv Biatcovcov KaOeBpav. Ol Be //.era 
 TOUTOV5, olov vTToBidtcovoi, avcvyvuHnai cet. Tfjs ftev rd|ea)5
 
 THE MINISTKY. 357 
 
 avrcov ov KaOaipovvrai 49 ya^aavre^, Trpoa^drjvat Be ei9 /W- 
 ova ov SvvavTCU, pevei, ovv e/cacrro? ev y evpeOrj. Tovs 8e eTTt- 
 e/cXeyet r) e/c/cX^cr/a irdvrore IK Trjs rae&)9 rwv povaywv 
 6K Trapdevwv rf etc ffox^povtav 7rap6evov<f pev KCL\ovpv TOV? 
 Tore yvvaiica OTTGOCTOVV eyvcoKoras, crcatypoves Se \eyovrat, ol 
 /cat fJ*6vrj i/<tyu'/i&> ^wai/cl crvva(j)6evTe<; cet. 
 Cf. Jerem. in Actis Wirtemb. p. 129. 
 
 SIXTH POINT OF DIVEEGENCE. 
 
 The ministerial authority committed to the pastorate con- 
 sists, on Romish and Protestant principles, in the preaching 
 of the word of God, the administration of the sacraments, and 
 the power to forgive or retain sins. But as the Romish Church 
 has reserved the administration of two sacraments, ordination 
 and confirmation, and the Greek Church that of ordination, to 
 the bishops, so both limit still further, and more than they 
 limit preaching, the offering of the sacrifice on the altar. Ex- 
 communication, that is, exclusion from the communion" of the 
 Church, is regarded as issuing from the power of the keys, 
 and has consequently never been considered in praxi to be the 
 function of any particular minister. The excommunication 
 practised in the Ionian Church, the major and the minor, has 
 always been held to belong to the episcopate. But the power 
 of jurisdiction given by that Church to the bishops, as by 
 divine right, is rejected by Protestants. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. ROMISH AND GREEK. 
 
 Catech. Rom. ii. 7. 6 : Potestas ecclesiastica est duplex, 
 ordinis et jurisdictionis. Ordinis potestas ad verum Christi 
 domini corpus in sacrosancta eucharistia refertur, jurisdictionis 
 vero potestas tota in Christi corpore mystico versatur. Ad earn 
 enim spectat christianum populum gubernare et moderari et ad 
 seternam coelestemque beatitudinem dirigere.
 
 358 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 JTb. ii 7. 2 : Sacerdotibus potestas turn corpus et sanguinem 
 domini nostri conficiendi et offerendi, turn peccata remittendi 
 collata est. 32 : In sacerdote non solum ea cognitio requi- 
 renda est, quae ad sacramentorum usum et tractationem per- 
 tinet, sed etiam sacrarum literar. scientia ita instructum esse 
 oportet, ut populo christianae fidei mysteria et divinae legis 
 praecepta tradere, ad virtutem et pietatem excitare, e vitiis 
 revocare fideles possit. Cf. praefat. 5. 
 
 Ib. i 11. 4: Cum necesse fuerit, in ecclesiS, potestatem 
 esse peccata remittendi, ali& etiam ratione, quam baptismi 
 sacramento, claves regni coelorum illi concreditae sunt, quibus 
 possint unicuique poenitenti, etiamsi usque ad extremum vitae 
 diem peccasset, deKcta condonari. 5 : Neque vero existiman- 
 dum est, hanc potestatem certis quibusdam peccatorum gene- 
 ribus definitam esse, nullum enim tarn nefarium facinus vel 
 admitti vel cogitari potest, cujus remittendi potestatem sancta 
 ecclesia non habeat. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxv. d, reformat, cap. 3 : Quamvis excom- 
 municationis gladius nervus sit ecclesiasticas disciplinae et ad 
 continendos in officio populos valde salutaris : sobrie tamen 
 magnaque circumspectione exercendus est, cum experientia 
 doceat, si temere aut levibus ex rebus incutiatur, magis con- 
 temni, quam formidari, et perniciem.potius parere, quam salu- 
 tem. Quapropter excommunicationes illae, quae monitionibus 
 praemissis ad finem revelationis ut aiunt pro deperditis seu 
 subtractis rebus ferri solent, a nemine prorsus praeterquam ab 
 episcopo decernantur, et tune non alias quam ex re non vul- 
 gari causaque diligenter ac magnet maturitate per episcopum 
 examinata, quae ejus animum moveat ; nee ad eas concedendas 
 cujusvis saecularis etiam magistrates auctoritate adducatur cet. 
 
 As to the distinction between excommunicatio major and 
 minor, s. Walter, Kirchenrecht, S. 365 ff. 
 
 Conf. orthod. p. 174: 15 rrjv olKOvofiiav ravrrjv (fivarr)- 
 Geov, 1 Cor. iv. 1) &vo Trpdjfjiara irepie^ovrat, irpwTOV 77 
 KOI rj %ova-{a rov \veiv ra? T<WZ> avQpwTrwv afiaprias, 
 . . . Sevrepov rj e^ovcria Kal 17 Sui/a/zt? rov BiSdcriceiv. Metroph. 
 Critop. Conf. c. 11, p. 108, Btaicovia rov \6yov Kal rwv fiva-rr)- 
 piwv iepovpyia, cf. p. 110, and Jer. in Actis Wirtemb. p. 105. 
 
 Excommunication is not in the Greek Confessions. But it
 
 THE MINISTRY. 359 
 
 is customary in that Church, though attended by much super- 
 stition and abuse. 
 
 II. PKOTESTANT. 
 
 Apol. A. O. p. 294 : Habet episcopus potestatem ordinis, 
 hoc est ininisterium verbi et sacramentorum, habet et potesta- 
 tem jurisdictionis, hoc est auctoritatem excommunicandi ob- 
 noxios publicis criminibus et rursus absolvendi eos, si conversi 
 petant absolutionem. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 351: Evangelium tribuit his, qui prsesunt ecclesiis, 
 mandatum docendi evangelii, remittendi peccata, administrandi 
 sacramenta, prseterea jurisdictionem, videlicet mandatum ex- 
 communicandi eos, quorum nota sunt crimina, et resipiscentes 
 rursum absolvendi. Ac omnium confessione etiam adversa- 
 riorum liquet, hanc potestatem jure divino communem esse 
 omnibus, qui prsesunt ecclesiis, sive vocentur pastores, sive 
 presbyteri, sive episcopi. 
 
 A. C. p. 39 : Secundum evangelium s. de jure divino nulla 
 jurisdictio competit episcopis ut episcopis h. e. his, quibus est 
 commissum ministerium verbi et sacramentorum, nisi remittere 
 peccata, item cognoscere doctrinam et doctrinam ab evangelic 
 dissentientem rejicere et impios, quorum nota est impietas, 
 excludere a communione ecclesiae sine vi humana sed verbo. 
 ... Si quam habent aliam vel potestatem vel jurisdictionem 
 in cognoscendis certis causis videl. matrimonii aut decimarum 
 cet, hanc habent humano jure. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 1 8 : In hoc sunt vocati ministri ecclesiae, 
 ut evangelium Christi adnuncient fidelibus et sacramenta ad- 
 ministrent. Potestas ecclesiastica ministrorum ecclesiae est 
 functio ilia, qua ministri ecclesiam dei gubernant quidem, 
 verum omnia in ecclesia sic faciunt, quemadmodum verbo suo 
 prsescripsit dominus, quae cum facta sunt, fideles tanquam ab 
 ipso domino facta reputant. Officia ministrorum sunt varia, 
 quae tamen plerique ad duo restringunt, in quibus omnia alia 
 comprehenduntur, ad doctrinam Christi evangelicam et ad legi- 
 timam sacramentorum administrationem. 
 
 A. Sm. p. 333 : Majorem illam excommunicationem, quam 
 papa ita nominat, non nisi civilem poenam esse ducimus, non 
 pertinentem ad nos ministros ecclesiae : minor autem, quam
 
 360 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 nominat, vera et Christiana est excomraunicatio, quae manifestos 
 et obstinates peccatores non admittit ad sacramentum et com- 
 munionem ecclesiae, donee emendentur et scelera vitent. Et 
 niinistri non debent confundere hanc ecclesiasticam pcenam 
 seu excommunicationem cum poenis civilibus. Ib. (de potest. 
 et prim, papae) p. 354 : Constat, jurisdictionem illam commu- 
 nem excommunicandi reos manifestorum criminuin pertinere 
 ad omnes pastores. 
 
 Conf. Gall. 33 : Excommunicationem approbamus, et una 
 cum suis appendicibus necessariam esse arbitramur. 
 
 Eng. Artt. art. xxxiii. : That person which by open denun- 
 ciation of the Church is rightly cut off from the unity of the 
 Church, and excommunicated, ought to be taken of the whole 
 multitude of the faithful as an heathen and publican, until he 
 be openly reconciled by penance, and received into the Church 
 by a judge that hath authority thereunto. 
 
 Conf. Angl. p. 9 1 : Ministris a Christo datum esse dicimus 
 ligandi, solvendi, aperiendi, claudendi potestatem. Ac solvendi 
 quidem munus in eo situm esse, ut minister vel dejectis animis 
 et vere resipiscentibus per evangelii praedicationem merita 
 Christi absolutionemque offerat et certam peccatorum condona- 
 tionem ac spem salutis seternae denunciet, aut ut eos, qui gravi 
 scandalo et notabili publicoque aliquo delicto fratrum animos 
 offenderint et sese a communi societate ecclesiae et a Christi 
 corpore quodammodo abalienarint, resipiscentes reconciliet et 
 in fidelium ccetum atque unitatem recolligat ac restittiat. 
 Ligandi vero ilium claudendique potestatem exercere dicimus, 
 quoties vel incredulis et contumacibus regni ccelorum januam 
 occludit illisque vindictam dei et sempiternum supplicium 
 edicit, vel publice excommunicatos ecclesise gremio excludit. 
 Sententiam autem, quamcunque ministri dei ad hunc modum 
 tulerint, deus ipse ita comprobat, ut quidquid illorum opera 
 solvitur et ligatur in terris, idem ipse solvere et ligare velit et 
 ratum habere in ccelis. 
 
 From the passages of the Eeformed symbols it is clear that 
 excommunication is understood of an exclusion from church fel- 
 lowship, but without civil consequences. Vid. A. C. 39. The 
 distinction in practice between the major and minor excom- 
 munication is post-symbolicaL
 
 THE MINISTRY. 361 
 
 THE POWER OF THE KEYS. 
 Observations. 
 
 The power of forgiving or retaining sins is termed, both in Romish 
 and in Protestant formularies, after Matt. xvi. 19, potestas eluvium. 
 Yet this expression is by no means limited to that meaning. The 
 Reformed Confessions, almost without exception, and the Lutheran 
 here and there, refer it to the ministry of the gospel generally, by 
 which the entrance of the kingdom of heaven is opened or shut. 
 The power of the keys, then, includes in it that binding or loosing, 
 since the preaching of the word is either an announcement of forgive- 
 ness or threatening of condemnation. The disciplinary power of the 
 keys is proved from Matt, xviii. 17 by Calvin, Inst. iv. 11. Bellar- 
 mine, De Rom. Pont. c. 13, refers Matt. xvi. to Peter's primacy, and 
 understands by the claves (cceli) the summa potestas in omnem 
 ecclesiam. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. PROTESTANT. 
 
 A. C. p. 37 : Sic sentiunt, potestatem clavium seu potesta- 
 tem episcoporum juxta evangelium potestatem esse seu man- 
 datum del prsedicandi evangelii, remittendi et retinendi peccata 
 et administrandi sacramenta. Nam cum hoc mandate Christus 
 mittit apostolos. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 14: De clavibus regni del traditis a 
 domino apostolis multi admiranda garriunt et ex his cudunt 
 enses, lanceas, sceptra et coronas, plenamque in maxima regna, 
 denique in animas et corpora potestatem. Nos simpliciter 
 judicantes secundum verbum dei dicimus, omnes ministros 
 legitime vocatos habere et exercere claves vel usum clavium, 
 cum evangelium adnunciant, id est populum suae fidei creditum 
 decent, hortantur, consolantur et increpant inque disciplina 
 retinent. Ita enim regnum coelorum aperiunt obsequentibus 
 et inobsequentibus claudunt. . . . Eite itaque et emcaciter 
 ministri absolvunt, dum evangelium Christi et in hoc remis- 
 sionem peccatorum, quae singulis promittitur fidelibus, sicuti 
 et singuli sunt baptizati, praedicant et ad singulos peculiariter 
 pertinere testantur. 
 
 Cat. Heiddb. Fr. 83: What is the office of the keys? 
 The preaching of the holy gospel and Christian discipline, by
 
 362 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 which the kingdom of heaven is opened to believers and shut 
 against unbelievers. 
 
 Cf. Conf. Hdv. i art. 16 ; Conf. Angl. p. 91 sq.; Conf. Tdrap. 
 c. 13 ; Calvin, Instit. iv. 6. 3 and xi. 1. 
 
 II. EOMISH. 
 
 Bellarmin, I.e. : Nos et catholici omnes per claves datas 
 Petro intelligimus summam potestatem in omnem ecclesiam. 
 Id tribus rationibus confirmamus. Prirnum ipsa metaphora 
 clavium, ut in scripturis accipi solet, cf. Isa. xxii. 15-22, 
 Hie aperte per claves non intelligitur remissio peccatorum aut 
 ministerium verbi, sed principatus ecclesiasticus. . . . Secundo 
 probatur verbis illis quodcunqiie ligaveris cet., nam in scripturis 
 ligare dicitur, qui praecipit et qui punit, Matt. xxiiL 4, xviii. 
 18. Tertio probatur ex patribus cet
 
 XXL 
 DIYINE WOKSHIP: LITUKGY. 
 
 WITH the exception of the Quakers, all Christian communions 
 have an appointed order of divine service. The necessary 
 constituents of this are the preaching of the word of God, and 
 the administration of the sacraments, with the sacrifice of the 
 mass in the Komish and Greek Churches. These essential 
 elements may be clothed with edifying ceremonies, and, as in 
 a liturgy, made compact and harmonious. Such religious cere- 
 monies appear to Protestants as in their nature adiaphora, 
 indifferent, that is, as not necessary to the attainment of sal- 
 vation ; and every particular Church has the right to appoint 
 them, according to its necessities, and in accordance with the 
 word of God. The Papists and Greeks regard the ritual and 
 ceremonial of the Church as commandments necessary to be 
 observed ; and derive them, or those of them which are con- 
 nected with the sacrifice of the mass, from apostolical or 
 ecclesiastical tradition. Their worship is at the same time 
 complicated with much more abundant ceremonies than that 
 of the Protestants. The Reformed Church among the latter is 
 almost entirely free from ceremonial ; and its symbols appoint 
 but few ecclesiastical usages of any kind. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 Parallel with ecclesiastical ceremonies are the pious exercises 
 which are appointed in the Romish Church ad promerendam gratiam, 
 such as fastings, pilgrimages, etc. For the protests of the evangelical 
 Church against these human traditions, see No. I. The priestly con- 
 secrations of various things are contended against in Conf. Wirt. p. 
 129. Many matters of this kind are usually by Papists summed up 
 under the term sacramentalia or ritus sacramentales. 
 
 363
 
 364 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 
 I. QUAKER. 
 
 Barclay, Apol. Prop. XL : All true and acceptable worship 
 to God is offered in the inward and immediate moving and 
 drawing of His own Spirit, which is neither limited to places, 
 times, nor persons. For though we are to worship Him 
 always, and continually to fear before Him; yet as to the 
 outward signification thereof, in prayers, praises, or preachings, 
 we ought not to do it in our own will, where and when we 
 will, but where and when we are moved thereunto by the 
 stirring and secret inspiration of the Spirit of God in our 
 hearts ; which God heareth and accepteth of, and is never 
 wanting to move us thereunto when need is, of which He 
 Himself is the alone proper judge. All other worship, then, 
 both praises, prayers, or preachings, which man sets about in 
 his own will and at his own appointment, which he can 
 both begin and end at his pleasure, do or leave undone as 
 himself seeth meet, whether they be a prescribed form, as a 
 liturgy, etc., or prayers conceived extempore by the natural 
 strength or faculty of the mind, they are all but superstition, 
 will-worship, and abominable idolatry in the sight of God, 
 which are now to be denied and rejected, and separated from, 
 in this day of His spiritual arising. However, it might have 
 pleased Him (who winked at the times of ignorance, with a 
 respect to the simplicity and integrity of some, and of His 
 own innocent seed, which lay as it were buried in the hearts 
 of men under that mass of superstition) to blow upon the 
 dead and dry bones, and to raise some breathing of His own, 
 and answer them ; and that until the day should more clearly 
 dawn and break forth. 
 
 In that these particular men come not thither to meet with 
 the Lord, and to wait for the inward motions and operations of 
 His Spirit ; and so to pray as they feel the Spirit breathe 
 through them, and in them ; and to preach as they find them- 
 selves actuated and moved by God's Spirit, and as He gives 
 utterance, so as to speak a word in season to refresh weary 
 souls, and as the present condition and state of the people's
 
 DIVINE WORSHIP : LITURGY. 365 
 
 hearts require, suffering God by His Spirit both to prepare 
 people's hearts, and also give the preacher to speak what may 
 be fit and seasonable for them. 
 
 To come, then, to the state of the controversy as to the 
 public worship, we judge it the duty of all to be diligent in 
 the assembling of themselves together, and when assembled, 
 the great work of one and all ought to be to wait upon God ; 
 and returning out of their own thoughts and imaginations, to 
 feel the Lord's presence, and know a gathering into His name 
 indeed, where He is in the midst, according to His promise. 
 And as every one is thus gathered, and so met together in- 
 wardly in their spirits, as well as outwardly in their persons, 
 there the secret power and virtue of life is known to refresh 
 the soul, and the pure motions and breathings of God's Spirit 
 are left to arise ; from which, as words of declaration, prayers 
 and praises arise, the acceptable worship is known, which 
 edifies the Church, and is well-pleasing to God. And no man 
 here limits the Spirit of God, nor bringeth forth his own 
 conned and gathered stuff; but every one puts that forth 
 which the Lord puts into their hearts ; and it is uttered forth 
 not in man's will or wisdom, but in the evidence and demon- 
 stration of the Spirit and of power. Yea, though there be 
 not a word spoken, yet is the true spiritual worship performed, 
 and the body of Christ edified ; yea, it may, and hath often 
 fallen out among us, that divers meetings have passed without 
 one word, and yet our souls have been greatly edified and 
 refreshed, and our hearts wonderfully overcome with the secret 
 sense of God's power and Spirit, which without words hath 
 been ministered from one vessel to another. 
 
 II. EOMAN AND GREEK. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. xxii. Sacrific. niissae, cap. 5 : Cum natura 
 hominum ea sit, ut non facile queat sine adminiculis exteriori- 
 bus ad rerum divinarum meditationem sustolli, propterea pia 
 mater ecclesia ritus quosdam, ut scilicet qusedam summissa 
 voce, alia vero elatiore in missS, pronunciarentur, instituit ; 
 ceremonias item adhibuit, ut mysticas benedictiones, lumina, 
 thymiamata, vestes aliaque id genus multa ex apostolic^ dis-
 
 366 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 ciplin& et traditione, quo et majestas tanti sacrificii commenda- 
 retur et mentes fidelium per haec visibilia religionis et pietatis 
 signa ad rerum altissimarum, quae in hoc sacrificio latent, con- 
 templationem excitarentur. 
 
 Jb. can. 7 : Si quis dixerit, ceremonias, vestes et externa 
 signa, quibus in missanun celebratione ecclesia catholica utitur, 
 irritabula impietatis esse magis, quam officia pietatis, ana- 
 thema sit. 
 
 Ib. sess. vii. sacram. can. 13 : Si quis dixerit, receptos et 
 approbates ecclesiae catholicse ritus, in solemni sacramentorum 
 administratione adhiberi consuetos aut contemni aut sine pec- 
 cato a ministris pro libito omitti, aut in novos alios per quem- 
 cunque ecclesiarum pastorem mutari posse : anathema sit. 
 
 Cat. Eom. ii 2. 59 : These ceremonies in the sacraments 
 are not obscurely referred to the apostles' origination. 
 
 (Bellarmin, De sacram. ii. 30 : Fatemur omnes catholici, 
 ceremonias ecclesiasticas non esse praecipuum cultum, nee ab 
 iis pendere essentiam et efficaciam sacramentorum, nee habere 
 vim justificandi, ut habent sacramenta, proinde inferiora esse 
 sacramentis nee esse approbandos ritus, qui pugnant cum verbo 
 dei, nee esse nimis multiplicandas, ita ut sua\ multitudine 
 obruant quodammodo religionem, cui servire debent. Nota, 
 totam controversiam consistere in sex capitibus. Primum 
 est, an sint aliquse ceremoniae a Christo vel apostolis insti- 
 tutae, quae non habeantur in scriptura, sed ex traditione solst 
 cognoscantur ; secundum est, an ceremoniae, quae non sunt 
 sacramenta, habeant vim aliquam spiritualeni, ut coercendi 
 daemones ; tertium est, an ecclesia possit instituere novas 
 ceremonias: quartum an possit eas ita instituere, ut teneantur 
 fideles in conscientia eas servare etiam circa scandalum ; 
 quintum, an ejusmodi ceremoniae sint res bonae et meritoriae 
 et pars aliqua divini cultus ; sextum, an lingua latina sacra- 
 menta celebranda et ministranda sint. Ad hasc omnia catho- 
 lici respondent affirmative, ad eadem capita solo excepto tertio 
 omnes fere Lutherani et Calvinistae respondent negative. Id. 
 De missa, ii 13 : Chemnicius dicit, apud catholicos ita neces- 
 sariam existimari ceremoniarum observantiam, ut pronuncient 
 mortaliter peccare, qui aliquid in ill is neglexerint. At hoc 
 mendacium est, non enim ap. nos quaelibet negligentia pec-
 
 DIVINE WORSHIP : LITURGY. 367 
 
 catum est mortale, sed contemtus aut notabilis negligentia in 
 rebus gravibus.) 
 
 The Greeks not only regard their liturgy as perfect, but 
 attach to ceremonies as much importance as the Eomans do. 
 Comp. Simeon Thessalon. irepl rov vaov /cal ef j^o-t? et<? Trjv 
 \eiTovpyiav in Goari Euchol. p. 212 sqq. ; s. also Heineccii 
 Abbild. i. 28 ; Augusti Progr. i. p. 6 sqq. The ritual of the 
 mass is carried back to the apostles, Jerem. in Act. Wirtemb. 
 p. 103 ; but Metroph. Critop., Conf. ch. vii. p. 85, refers the 
 sacramental ceremonies to a tradition of the Church, under 
 the influence of the Holy Ghost. 
 
 III. PROTESTANT. 
 
 C. A. p. 13: De ritibus ecclesiasticis docent, quod ritus illi 
 servandi sint, qui sine peccato servari possunt et prosunt ad 
 tranquillitatem et bonum ordinem in ecclesia, sicut certse 
 feriae, festa et similia. De talibus rebus tamen admonentur 
 homines, ne conscientiee onerentur, tanquam talis cultus ad 
 salutem necessarius sit. 
 
 Apol. A. C. p. 1 5 1 : Damnant adversarii . . ., quod diximus 
 ad veram unitatem ecclesiae satis esse consentire de doctrina 
 evangelii'et administratione sacramentorum, nee necesse esse, 
 ubique similes traditiones humanas esse sen ritus et cere- 
 monias ad hominibus institutes. Cf. A. C. p. 19 sq. 
 
 F. C. p. 615: Credimus, . . . quod ceremonise s. ritus 
 ecclesiastici, qui verbo dei neque prsecepti sunt neque pro- 
 hibiti, sed tantum decori et ordinis caus& instituti, non sint 
 per se cultus divinus aut aliqua saltern pars cultus divini. 
 Credimus, ecclesise dei ubivis terrarum et quocunque 
 tempore licere pro re nata" ceremonias tales mutare juxta 
 earn rationem, quse ecclesise dei utilissima et ad sedificationem 
 ejusdem maxime accommodata judicatur. P. 616 : Credimus, 
 . . . quod ecclesia alia aliam damnare non debeat propterea, 
 quod hsec vel ilia plus minusve externarum ceremoniarum, 
 quas dominus non instituti, observet, si modo in doctrina 
 ejusque articulis omnibus et in vero sacramentorum usu sit 
 inter eas consensus. Hoc enim vetus et verum dictum est: 
 Dissonantia jejunii non dissolvit consonantiam fidei.
 
 368 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Conf. Angl. p. 9 6 : De multitudine otiosarum ceremoniarum 
 scimus Augustinum graviter suo tempore conquestum esse. 
 Itaque nos magnum earum numerum resecavimus, quod illis 
 sciremus affligi conscientias hominum et gravari ecclesiam del. 
 Eetinemus tamen et colimus non tantum ea, quae scimus tradita 
 fuisse ab apostolis, sed etiam alia quaedam, quae nobis vide- 
 bantur sine ecclesiae incommodo ferri posse. 
 
 Eng. Artt. art. xxxiv. : It is not necessary that traditions 
 and ceremonies be in all places one, and utterly like ; for at 
 all times they have been diverse, and may be changed accord- 
 ing to the diversities of countries, times, and men's manners, 
 so that nothing be ordained against God's word. Whosoever 
 through his private judgment willingly and purposely doth 
 openly break the traditions and ceremonies of the Church, 
 which be not repugnant to the word of God, and be ordained 
 and approved by common authority, ought to be rebuked 
 openly (that others may fear to do the like), as he that offend- 
 eth against the common order of the Church, and hurteth the 
 authority of the magistrate, and woundeth the consciences of 
 the weak brethren. Every particular or national Church hath 
 authority to ordain, change, and abolish ceremonies or rites 
 of the Church, ordained only by man's authority, so that all 
 things be done to edifying. 
 
 Conf. Belg. art. 32 : Eejicimus omnia humana inventa 
 omnesque leges, quae pro cultu dei a quocunque introduci 
 possunt, ut iisdem conscientias ullo omnino modo devinci- 
 antur atque constringantur. Illud itaque solum suscipimus, 
 quod ad conservandam et alendann concordiam atque unitatem 
 omnesque in dei obedientia retinendos idoneum est. Ad id 
 vero inprimis requiritur excommunicatio juxta verbum dei 
 usurpata cet. 
 
 Conf. Hdv. i art. 23 : Ceteras vero (preaching, eucharist, 
 etc., had been referred to) ceremoniarum ambages inutiles ac 
 innumerabiles, vasa, vestes, vela, faces, aras, aurum, argentum, 
 quatenus pervertendae religioni serviunt, idola praesertim, quae 
 ad oultum prostant et offensionem praebent, ac id genus omnia 
 prophana a sacro nostro costu procul arcemus. 
 
 Conf. JTelv. ii cap. 2 7 : Quanto magis accedit cumulo rituum 
 in ecclesia, tanto magis detrahitur non tantum libertati chris-
 
 DIVINE WORSHIP : LITURGY. 369 
 
 tianse, sed et Christo et ejus fidei, dum vulgus ea quaerit in 
 ritibus, quae qusereret in solo Jesu Christo per fidem. Suffi- 
 ciunt itaque piis pauci moderati, simplices nee alieni a verbo 
 dei ritus. Quod si in ecclesiis dispares inveniuntur ritus, 
 nemo ecclesias existimet ex eo esse dissidentes. . . . Et nos 
 hodie ritus diversos in celebratione ccenae domini et in aliis 
 nonnullis rebus habentes in nostris ecclesiis, in doctrina tamen 
 et fide non dissidemus, neque unitas societasque ecclesarium 
 nostrarum ea re discinditur. Semper vero ecclesise in hujus- 
 modi ritibus, sicut mediis, usae sunt libertate. Id quod nos 
 hodie quoque facimus. 
 
 See Conf. Bohem. art. 15 ; Declar. Thorun. p. 59; and the 
 Conf. Remonstr. xxiii. 68. 
 
 THE VERNACULAR. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 As in Protestant worship all is ordered for edification through the 
 divine word, the Confessions ordained the use of the language of 
 the country in public service. The Romish Church has permitted 
 the Latin language in the performance of holy rites. The Council 
 of Trent expressly prescribed this tongue for the Mass. 
 
 SYMBOLICAL TESTIMONIES. 
 I. PtOMISH. 
 
 Cone. Trid. sess. 22, sacrific. missse, cap. 8 : Etsi missa mag- 
 nam contineat populi fidelis eruditionem, non tamen expedire 
 visum est patribus, ut vulgari passim lingu& celebraretur. 
 Quamobrem retento ubique cujusque ecclesise antiquo et a 
 sancta Eom. ecclesia", omnium ecclesiarum matre et magistra, 
 probato ritu, ne oves Christi esuriant neve parvuli panem 
 petant et non sit, qui frangat eis, mandat s. synodus pastoribus 
 et singulis curam animarum gerentibus, ut frequenter inter 
 missarum celebrationem, vel per se vel per alios, ex iis, quse 
 in missa leguntur, aliquid exponant atque inter cetera sanctis- 
 simi hujus sacrificii mysterium aliquod declarent, diebus prse- 
 sertim dominicis et festis. Comp. Bellarmin, Controv. de 
 missa, ii. 11 sq, 
 
 2 A
 
 370 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 Confut. A. C. p. 99 sq.: Cum persona communis sit sacerdos 
 totius ecclesiae, non solum circumstantium, ideo non minim, 
 quod sacerdos latine in latina celebrat ecclesia. Proficit autem 
 auditori, si in fide ecclesiae audit missam. . . . Neque neces- 
 sarium est, ut omnia verba missae audiat vel intelligat et 
 etiam intelligens semper attendat : prasstat enim intelligere et 
 attendere finem, quia missa celebratur, ut offeratur eucharistia 
 in memoriam passionis Christi. 
 
 II. PROTESTANT. 
 
 A. C. p. 23 sq. : Servantur usitatse cerimonias fere omnes 
 (in missa) praterquam quod latinis concionibus admiscentur 
 alicubi germanicae, quae addita3 sunt ad docendum populum cet. 
 
 A. C. p. 250 : Adversarii longam declamationem habent 
 de usu latinae linguae in missa, in qua suaviter ineptiunt, 
 quomodo prosit auditori indocto in fide ecclesiae missam non in- 
 tellectam audire ; videlicet fingunt, ipsum opus audiendi cultum 
 esse et prodesse sine intellectu. Latinam linguam retinemus 
 propter bos, qui latine discunt et intelligunt. Et admiscemus 
 germanicas cantiones, ut habeat et populus, quod discat et 
 quo excitet fidem et tiinorem. Conf. Wirtemb. p. 118. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. c. 22: Taceant omnes peregrinae linguae in 
 ccetibus sacris. Omnia proponantur lingua vulgari et quae eo 
 in loco ab hominibus in coetu intelligatur. 
 
 Conf. Angl. p. 122 : Precamur ea lingua", quam nostri, ut 
 par est, omnes intelligant, ut populus, quemadmodum Paulus 
 monet, a communibus votis utilitatem communem capiat, 
 quemadmodum omnes pii patres et catholici episcopi, non 
 tantum in veteri, verum etiam in novo testamento, et precati 
 sunt ipsi et populum precari docuerunt : ne, ut Augustinus 
 ait, tanquam psittaci et merulae videamur sonare, quod nes- 
 cimus. Comp. Eng. Art. xxiv. 
 
 See Dedar. Thoi-un.'ip. 57.
 
 DIVINE WORSHIP : LITURGY. 3*71 
 
 IMAGES AND PICTURES. 
 
 Observations. 
 
 The most important difference between the Lutheran and the Re- 
 formed Churches in the matter of divine worship concerns the 
 adornment of churches by pictures (and altars). The former holds 
 these permissible, though indifferent. The latter rejects them. 
 
 I. REFORMED. 
 
 Conf. Helv. ii. cap. 4 : Eejicimus . . . Christianonun 
 simulacra. Tametsi enim Ch. humanam assumserit naturam, 
 non ideo tamen assumsit, ut typum prseferret statuariis atque 
 pictoribus. . . . Ut instituantur homines in religione preedi- 
 care jussit evangelium dominus, non pingere et pictura" laicos 
 erudire ; sacramenta quoque instituit, nullibi statuas constituit. 
 
 Cat. Heidelb. Fr. 98 : May not pictures be endured in the 
 church as the books of the people ? No ; for we should not 
 be wiser than God, who will teach His Christendom not by 
 dumb figures, but by the living preaching ol His word. 
 
 Comp. Conf. Czenger. p. 158; Calvin, Institut. i 11. 13. 
 The altars are particularly mentioned, Conf. Helv. i. art. 23. 
 
 II. LUTHERAN. 
 
 The Lutheran symbols give no utterance concerning pictures 
 in churches. But Luther's own opinion is plain from the 
 following : 
 
 WerJce v. Walch, vi 2747 : When the worship of them is 
 out of the question, we may use figures, like letters, which 
 remind us of good things, and put them as it were before our 
 eyes. Who is so stone blind as not to see that, as Christian 
 stories may be told without sin and to the profit of the 
 hearers, so for the good of the simple such histories may 
 without sin be painted and carved, not only at home in our 
 houses, but publicly in the churches ? I assuredly know that 
 God will have His word to be heard and read, especially 
 concerning the passion of Christ. But if I hear and think of
 
 372 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 this, it is impossible but that I form images of those things in 
 my mind. For, will I or will I not, if I hear of Christ, the 
 figure of a man is drawn in my heart, hanging on the cross ; 
 just as my countenance is pictured in the water when I look 
 into it. If then it is not sin, but a good thing, to have Christ's 
 image in my heart, why should it be sin to have it before my 
 eyes ? For, the heart is more than the eyes, and ought 
 more than the eyes to be preserved from sin : since there is 
 the true dwelling-place and seat of God Himself. 
 Cf. Chemnicius, Exam. iv. 2. 9.
 
 TABLES OF COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 
 373
 
 374 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 COMPAEATIVE 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFOEMED. 
 
 Christianity is a Divine 
 the saving 
 from the Bible and tradition ; 
 
 which, under the special influence of the Holy 
 
 Ghost, have been, the former written, the 
 
 latter continued uncorrupt. 
 
 The interpretation of the Bible rests with the 
 Church, led by the Holy Ghost, 
 and finally with the ' 
 Pope. 
 
 According 
 
 God is 
 
 that is, the divine essence exists in 
 in dignity 
 
 (The Holy Ghost pro- 
 ceeds from Father and 
 
 Son.) 
 
 (The Holy Ghost pro- 
 ceeds from the Father 
 alone.) 
 
 Besides this Triune God 
 
 Yet it is wholesome to 
 
 invoke Mary, who was 
 
 conceived without sin, 
 
 and 
 
 the saints as inter- 
 cessors with God, and 
 to reverence their 
 pictures and relics. 
 
 Man is born with a corrupt 
 the first man, 
 
 (besides natural facul- 
 ties of his soul) habi- 
 tual holiness and im- 
 mortality (gifts of 
 divine grace). 
 
 immortality, perfect 
 wisdom, and a will 
 regulated by reason. 
 
 Through 
 
 Revelation communicated 
 truths of which 
 
 from the 
 
 There exists in the Church 
 contents unfold 
 
 to the 
 a 
 
 Three Persons, both in nature and 
 perfectly equal. 
 
 (The Holy Ghost proceeds 
 
 there is no 
 All service of saints, 
 
 bias, which was not his 
 that is, as he came 
 
 a justitia originalis inwrought, and belong- 
 ing to his nature (and immortality). 
 
 the
 
 COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 
 375 
 
 THEOLOGY. TABLE I. 
 
 ABMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 to mankind 
 must be 
 
 Bible alone, 
 
 no infallible tribunal of interpretation of 
 themselves to 
 
 Christian 
 Trinity ; 
 
 that is, the divine essence exists in Three 
 
 Persons, equal in nature, but in dignity 
 
 admitting subordination. 
 
 from Father and Son.) 
 
 object of divine worship, 
 pictures, and relics is 
 
 property from the 
 from the hands of his 
 
 innocence, and hope of 
 
 - 
 
 first 
 
 through Christ, 
 derived 
 
 from the New Testament. 
 
 Holy Scripture ; its divine 
 every Christian. 
 
 Revelation 
 God, the eternal and absolute Being, is one 
 
 Jesus, the Man, was in time exalted by God 
 to divine majesty; and to Him, who now in 
 eternity is God, belongs divine honour ; the 
 Holy Ghost is nothing personal in God, but 
 the divine power working unto sanctification. 
 
 Besides Him there is no object of divine 
 worship. 
 
 contrary to Scripture. 
 
 beginning of the race ; 
 Creator, possessed 
 continuance in being. 
 
 sin
 
 376 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 TABLE I. continued. 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 Adam and his pos- 
 terity lost those di- 
 vine gifts of grace, 
 and his will (towards 
 good) was weakened. 
 
 Adam and his pos- 
 terity lost immortal- 
 ity, and his will re- 
 ceived a bias towards 
 evil. 
 
 In this state the natural man, even 
 
 sinner before God 
 
 Original sin consists 
 in the carentiajustitias 
 originalis ; evil con- 
 cupiscence, however, 
 is not itself sin, but 
 only leads to sin. 
 
 and commits, 
 
 although not absolutely without power of 
 
 will towards good, well pleasing to God, and 
 
 not in his natural state doing only evil. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 Adam and his posterity lost the justitia 
 originalis, and there entered a total corrup- 
 tion of his nature (in spiritual things). 
 
 before be commits actual sin, Is a 
 
 (in original or inherited sin). 
 
 Evil concupiscence is positively original sin. 
 
 following his evil desire, 
 
 being altogether unable to do what is pleas- 
 ing to God, and able to do nothing but sin.
 
 COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 
 TABLE I. continued. 
 
 377 
 
 ARMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 Adam and his posterity lost their destined 
 quence of repeated sinning, man's 
 
 The natural man is affected with an 
 Involve 
 The bias to evil is 
 
 manifold 
 although not absolutely unable 
 
 freedom from death; and now, in conse- 
 nature is firmly held by a bias to eviL 
 
 Inherited evil, which, however, does not 
 guilt, 
 not in itself sin. 
 
 sins, 
 to do anything good.
 
 373 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 COMPARATIVE 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 the Son of God (became man) 
 
 of two natures (the Divine and the 
 
 has, according to the 
 
 im- 
 
 inasmuch as He 
 
 His satisfaction was perfectly commensurate 
 The satisfaction of 
 Christ was indeed more 
 than sufficient; and the 
 superabun dant merit of 
 the Redeemer is com- 
 mitted to the Church 
 as a precious treasure. 
 
 The condition 
 
 attains to, being moved upon and sustained 
 by the Holy Ghost. 
 
 But 
 
 offered to all men 
 
 but may by them 
 
 In 
 
 (who appeared in the flesh 
 
 Chr 
 as the 
 
 con- 
 
 Human), which, most internally and insepar- 
 
 so that the properties 
 of the one nature be- 
 long also to the other 
 (communicatio idio- 
 
 yet so that no mutual 
 communication of the 
 properties of the two 
 natures takes place, 
 
 matum), 
 
 eternal purpose of God, obtained for 
 me- diate- 
 
 by His vicarious death has made satisfaction 
 
 with 'the sins of the world, and had before 
 God a sufficient value. 
 
 under which man is made partaker of 
 
 which 
 
 lacking all power of his own to good, can be- 
 gin and complete only through the influence 
 of the Holy Ghost. 
 
 this Divine 
 
 without distinction ; 
 
 be rejected. 
 
 offered only to those 
 whom God has by His 
 eternal absolute decree 
 elected to salvation. 
 
 It cannot be resisted 
 by the elect. 
 
 order to attain to
 
 COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 
 379 
 
 THEOLOGY. TABLE IL 
 
 ARMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 1st 
 
 Son of God) 
 
 sisting 
 
 ably united, make one only Person, 
 
 mankind reconciliation with God and 
 
 to God for the world's sins ; 
 
 although. His death had not in itself this 
 satisfying power, but received it through 
 the mercy of God, who reckoned the satisfac- 
 tion, imperfect of itself, as perfect for man. 
 
 reconciliation with God and eternal salva- 
 man 
 
 by the help of the Holy Ghost begins and 
 finishes. 
 
 help 
 
 imparted to all men 
 
 but may by them 
 salvation, man Is 
 
 a man, conceived by the Holy Ghost and born 
 as the Son of God, 
 
 of one nature, the Human, exalted to divine 
 majesty. 
 
 eternal life, 
 
 mediately ; 
 
 in that by His teaching and work He has 
 
 opened the way for an amendment acceptable 
 
 to God, which He rewards of His grace with 
 
 forgiveness and eternal salvation. 
 
 His death was not expiatory : it gave to 
 men a great motive to amendment ; and also 
 led Christ Himself to divine dignity and 
 heavenly authority on behalf of His own. 
 
 tion is spiritual regeneration, 
 
 begins by his own strength, but can finish 
 only by the aid of the Holy Ghost. 
 
 is 
 without distinction, 
 
 be rejected, 
 justified ;
 
 380 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 TABLE II. continued. 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 The Justified 
 
 that is, habitual right- 
 eousness is infused in- 
 to him ; and by the 
 good works which he 
 thereby performs, he 
 merits increase of 
 grace and eternal sal- 
 vation. 
 
 may do more than the 
 commandments of God 
 demand, and, by ob- 
 serving the evangelical 
 counsels, may obtain a 
 higher degree of moral 
 perfection and of 
 heavenly salvation. 
 
 may, however, 
 fall from a 
 
 But the venial sins, which do not in their 
 nature work condemnation, may be expiated 
 by personal satisfactions. 
 
 Mortal sins do not necessarily destroy faith. 
 
 that is, he receives 
 
 of grace for Christ's sake. But the merit of 
 Christ is appropriated by faith. 
 
 can, however, do no 
 
 through mortal sins, 
 state of grace ; 
 
 The lighter sins (of 
 inadvertence), which 
 might indeed bring 
 condemnation,are for- 
 given by God's grace 
 for Christ's merits' 
 sake. 
 
 Mortal sins consist 
 not with faith. 
 
 but never, even 
 through great sins, 
 can altogether lose 
 the grace of God. 

 
 COMPAKATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 
 TABLE II. continued. 
 
 381 
 
 ARMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 from God forgiveness of sins (and hope of 
 
 eternal salvation). 
 
 more tlian the commands of 
 
 God require. 
 
 may, however, sink 
 the unre- 
 
 again into the state of 
 generate.
 
 382 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 COMPAEATIVE 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 The 
 
 by means 
 and by means 
 
 which under visible signs communicate to 
 Christians the invisible grace of God. 
 
 The Sacraments exhibit this power, 
 
 in every partaker ex I 
 opere operate, \ 
 
 if the administrator does it cum intentions 
 
 Of 
 
 seven : Baptism ; Confirmation ; Eucharist ; 
 Penance ; Marriage ; Orders ; Extreme f 
 Unction. 
 
 Baptism must be 
 and it entirely destroys original sin. 
 
 In the Eucharist the veritable body and the 
 Christ axe substantially 
 
 that is, under the elements, which on conse- 
 cration lose their substance, and are changed 
 into the substance of Christ. 
 
 The body and blood of Christ are by 
 corporeally partaken 
 
 and this participation increases sanctifying 
 
 grace, confirms the forgiveness of remissible 
 
 sins, preserves from mortal sins, etc. 
 
 The laity need to re- 
 ceive only the body of 
 Christ. 
 
 All Christians 
 
 Regeneration of man 
 
 of the word 
 of the Sacraments, 
 
 which under and in 
 visible signs commu- 
 nicate to Christians 
 the invisible grace of 
 God. 
 
 which in the commu- 
 nication of visible signs 
 seal to the Christian 
 divine grace. 
 
 administered by godly or ungodly ministers, 
 
 only in believers, 
 
 | the elect, 
 
 without the intention of the minister being 
 necessary. 
 
 such Sacraments 
 
 only two, 
 
 administered to children of Christians, 
 
 and it abolishes the guilt of original sin, with- 
 out destroying the sin itself. 
 
 veritable blood of 
 present, 
 
 that is, in and under 
 the elements ; which 
 do not lose their sub- 
 stance, nor are chang- 
 ed into the body of 
 Christ. 
 
 communicants 
 of; 
 
 In the Supper, bread 
 
 The body and blood of 
 Christ are partaken of 
 by recipients spiritu- 
 ally in faith ; 
 
 and this participation assures of forgiveness 
 of sins, life, and salvation. 
 
 must receive the
 
 COMPAKATIYE THEOLOGY. 
 
 383 
 
 THEOLOGY. TABLE III. 
 
 ARMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 Is 
 of 
 
 The Sacraments are ceremonies -which sensibly 
 exhibit the spiritual covenant between God 
 and man. 
 
 effected 
 God; 
 
 The Sacraments are ceremonies by means of 
 which the Christian publicly avows his faith 
 in Christianity. 
 
 there 
 that is, Baptism and the Lord's 
 
 Baptism may be administered 
 and wine are signs of the substantial, not 
 
 Supper. 
 
 Baptism was not ordained as a permanent 
 rite. 
 
 to the children of Christians. 
 
 present, body and Wood of Christ. 
 
 the communicants 
 
 and thus make thankful confession of the 
 union with 
 
 bread and the 
 
 receiving both, 
 
 death of Christ suffered for men, and their 
 Christ. 
 
 wino.
 
 384 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 TABLE III. continued. 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 The Eucharist is also an expiatory sacrifice, 
 in which the priest presents unbloody to God 
 the body of Christ, which was offered in 
 blood on the cross ; and this oblation of Christ 
 in the mass procures benefit for the living 
 and the dead. 
 
 Justification 
 
 Penance consists not merely (a) in sincere re- 
 pentance, but also (b) in confession of sin to 
 the priest, in which the individual mortal 
 sins of which a man is conscious must be re- 
 counted, and (c) in the discharge of penances 
 imposed by the priest for the removal of the 
 temporal punishments which may have been 
 imposed by God. 
 
 With the absolution of the priest, who here 
 acts as judge, penance makes a proper sacra- 
 ment. 
 
 He who dies without 
 having made full sa- 
 tisfaction is placed in 
 purgatory, where, be- 
 fore he can enter hea- 
 ven, he must undergo 
 discipline of purifica- 
 tion. Indulgence dis- 
 pensed by the Church 
 secures dispensation 
 from penance to those 
 who know true repent- 
 ance. Indulgence also, 
 like masses for the dead 
 and other pious works, 
 abridge (per mpdum 
 suffragii) the pains of 
 purgatory. 
 
 There is no purgatory 
 
 lost may be restored 
 
 Repentance consists essentially 
 Confession of sin to the 
 
 but useful, and there- 
 fore as an ecclesiasti- 
 cal institute to be re- 
 tained. 
 
 Absolution is be- 
 stowed by the mini- 
 ster, not as judge, but 
 as announcer of the 
 divine will. 
 
 but in certain cases 
 useful, and therefore 
 to be permitted to such 
 as desire. 
 
 Yet no enumeration of 
 Ecclesiastical penances 
 
 Penance is by no means 
 Purgatory, and all
 
 COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 TABLE III. continued. 
 
 385 
 
 AKMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 through repentance. 
 
 of sincere sorrow for sin. 
 priest is not necessary, 
 
 particular sins is to be required, 
 disparage the merit of Christ. 
 
 a Christian sacrament. 
 
 that is connected with it, is of human 
 
 invention. 
 
 2B
 
 386 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 COMPAEATIVE 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 The 
 
 is the fellowship of all is the fellowship of all 
 confessors of Christ, those who accept and 
 good and evil, united \ profess all the articles 
 under Christ and His of faith transmitted 
 visible representative by the apostles, and 
 the Pope. ^ ! approved by general 
 
 i synods. 
 
 Without this visible church is no salvation. 
 
 The same is under the abiding influence of 
 
 the Holy Ghost, and therefore cannot err as 
 
 to matters of faith. 
 
 In the 
 
 which form an order essentially distinguished 
 from other Christians. This order has many 
 gradations of spiritual offices and dignities, 
 which jure divino are distinguished in their 
 prerogatives : that is, bishops, priests, and 
 ministers. 
 
 Among the bishops, 
 the first (Primas) is the 
 Bishop of Rome, as 
 successor of the Apostle 
 Peter, and therefore 
 the visible head of the 
 Church. 
 
 The bishops under the 
 Pope, 
 
 Among the bishops 
 the four patriarchs 
 have the highest rank, 
 but are of equal dig- 
 nity among them- 
 selves. 
 
 The bishops, 
 
 united in a general council, represent the 
 Church, and infallibly decide, under the guid- 
 ance of the Holy Ghost, concerning all mat- 
 ters of faith and ecclesiastical life. 
 
 All ministers 
 To their 
 by the sacrament of orders, which 
 
 impresses upon them 
 
 an indelible character, 
 
 but 
 
 can be administered only by the bishop, 
 
 Church 
 
 is the fellowship of saints united under 
 the pure gospel is preached and the 
 
 Without this church 
 The same is by the Holy 
 
 service of the Church specially 
 
 which form 
 
 There 
 
 and all 
 
 There is no 
 [rather is the 
 
 and, if united in a Synod, 
 
 of Christ must be regularly called 
 
 office, however, they are 
 by the apostolic ordinance of imposition of
 
 COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 
 387 
 
 THEOLOGY. TABLE IV. 
 
 ARMINIAN. 
 
 of 
 
 Christ as their invisible Head, in which 
 sacraments are duly administered. 
 
 is no salvation. 
 
 Ghost led into all truth. 
 
 appointed persons are 
 
 an order only officially distinguished from 
 
 are no 
 (jure divino) have the same vocation and 
 
 first among these (jure divino), and no visible 
 Pope Antichrist]. 
 
 they must decide only according to the 
 
 and appointed, 
 consecrated 
 hands, which may be exercised by all ministers, 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 Christ 
 
 is the fellowship of those who hold fast in 
 faith and obedience, and outwardly confess, 
 the doctrines of salvation announced by 
 Christ. 
 
 necessary, 
 
 other Christians, 
 priests, 
 official rights. 
 
 head of the Church 
 
 written word of God. 
 
 Christian ministers need no specific call
 
 388 
 
 CONFESSIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. 
 
 TABLE IV. continued. 
 
 ROMISH. 
 
 GREEK. 
 
 LUTHERAN. 
 
 REFORMED. 
 
 and entails the obliga- 
 tion of celibacy. 
 
 Bishops must be un- 
 married, but priests 
 and deacons must not 
 contract a second mar- 
 riage : otherwise they 
 lose their right to ex- 
 ercise spiritual func- 
 tions. 
 
 To all priests in common belongs, besides the 
 preaching of the gospel, the administration 
 
 of five sacraments : 
 baptism, penance, Eu- 
 charist, marriage, and 
 extreme unction ; 
 
 of six sacraments : 
 baptism, confirma- 
 tion, penance, Eucha- 
 rist, marriage, unc- 
 tion of sick ; 
 
 and the presentation of the sacrifice of the 
 mass. 
 
 To the bishops alone belongs the administra- 
 tion 
 
 of the sacraments of 
 
 confirmation and 
 
 orders. 
 
 of the sacrament of 
 orders.. 
 
 Ecclesiastical ceremonies are part of the 
 divine service,, most of them having apostoli- 
 cal origin ; and those connected with the 
 sacraments must not be omitted by the 
 priests, on pain of mortal sin. 
 
 and 
 
 The office of the ministry 
 administration 
 
 as also the exercise of 
 
 Ecclesiastical ceremonies, which are not 
 the need of 
 
 Pictures and altars | but they need be few ; 
 may be set up in : and pictures and altars 
 churches. i are not to be suffered 
 
 ! in churches.
 
 COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. 
 TABLE IV. continued. 
 
 389 
 
 ARMINIAN. 
 
 SOCINIAN. 
 
 does not involve the obligation of 
 
 celibacy. 
 
 consists in the preaching of the gospel, 
 of the 
 
 and in 
 sacraments : 
 
 the power of the keys. 
 
 part of the diviue worship, may be ordered 
 the community, in harmony with the word 
 
 by every particular church according to 
 of God ;
 
 INDEX. 
 
 ABILITY, human, 148. 
 Absolution, 303, 357. 
 Acceptatio, acceptilatio, 138. 
 Adoration of the host, 284. 
 Anabaptists, 29. 
 Antichrist, 353. 
 Arininianism, 28. 
 Altars in churches, 363. 
 Apocrypha, O.T., 60. 
 Atonement of Christ, 138. 
 Augsburg Confession, 15. 
 
 BAPTISM, meaning, 249 ; necessity, 
 255 ; infant, 258 ; of heretics, 262. 
 
 Barclay's Apology, 35. 
 
 Bible, 41, 56. 
 
 Bishops in general council, 351 ; juris- 
 diction, 352 ; celibacy of, in Greek 
 Church, 354. 
 
 Bread in the Eucharist, 290. 
 
 Bullarium Romanum, 10. 
 
 CALVIN'S doctrine of the Eucharist, 
 269. 
 
 Canon, 45. 
 
 Canonization of saints, 72. 
 
 Catechismus Romanus, 9. 
 
 Celibacy, 354. 
 
 Ceremonies of the Church, 361. 
 
 Chemnitz, Examen, 1. 
 
 Christ, divinity, 116 seq. ; person, 
 116; body, 124; impeccability and 
 sinlessness, 130 ; mediator in one 
 or both natures, 132 ; exaltation, 
 133 ; merit, 138. 
 
 Church, 330. 
 
 Clerici et laici, 346. 
 
 Communio sub una, 347. 
 
 Communicatio idiomatum, 116 seq. 
 
 Conception, immaculate, 98. 
 
 Concilia evangelica, 205. 
 
 Concupiscentia, 99. 
 
 Confessio Augustana, 15. 
 
 Confession, 303. 
 
 Confirmation, 318. 
 
 Consubstantiation, 280. 
 
 Councils, fficumenical, 56. 
 
 Cup, withdrawal of, 287. 
 Cultus of the Virgin, 68. 
 
 DECALOGUE, 227. 
 Decrees, divine, 161. 
 Divine image in man, 82. 
 Divine worship, 366. 
 
 ECCLESIA reprsesentans, 351. 
 
 Election, 161. 
 
 Elevation and adoration of the host 
 
 284. 
 Eucharistic sacrament and sacrifice 
 
 292. 
 Excommunication, major et minor 
 
 357. 
 
 Exorcism, 263. 
 Extreme unction, 325. 
 
 FAITH, in justification, 179 ; in chil- 
 dren, and mortal sin, 219. 
 
 Fall, effects of, 86 seq. 
 
 Fasting, 309. 
 
 Fathers and tradition, 49. 
 
 Feet-washing, 239, 243. 
 
 Fides formata, 189. 
 
 Filioque, 67. 
 
 Flacius' doctrine of original sin, 91. 
 
 Forensic justification, 178. 
 
 Formula Concordise, 17- 
 
 Free will, 48 ; its co-operation in re- 
 generation, 50. 
 
 GHOST, Holy, divine personality, 16 ; 
 procession, 57 ; in regeneration, 146. 
 Grace, 145 ; and ability, 148. 
 Grace, means of, 223. 
 Grace, resistible and irresistible, 146. 
 
 HEATHEN, perdition of, 333. 
 Hierarchy, 347. 
 
 Host, reservation and adoration of, 
 284. 
 
 IMAGE of God in man, 78 seq. 
 Immaculate conception, 198. 
 Imposition of hands, 353. 
 
 391
 
 392 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Imputation of Adam's sin, 106 ; to 
 
 faith, 188. 
 
 Inability, moral, 111. 
 Indelibility in sacrament, 243. 
 Indulgences, 143, 314. 
 Infralapsarians, 161. 
 Inspiration, 57. 
 Intention of priest, 243. 
 Invocation of saints, 68. 
 
 JUSTIFICATION, 178. 
 Justitia originalis, 82. 
 
 KEYS, power of the, 357. 
 
 LAW and gospel, 227. 
 
 Light, internal, 46. 
 
 Liinbus infantum and patrum, 312. 
 
 Liturgy, 345. 
 
 Lutheran confessions, 15. 
 
 MARRIAGE and divorce, 321. 
 
 Mary, immaculate conception, 198. 
 
 Mass, 292. 
 
 Masses, private, 296. 
 
 Means of grace, 222. 
 
 Merit, 201. 
 
 Meritum, de condigno and de congruo, 
 
 185. 
 Ministry, the, 340 ; degrees, 347 ; 
 
 equality, 347 ; Quaker, 344. 
 Monasticism, 210 ; and evangelical 
 
 counsels, 210. 
 
 NOTES of the Church, 330. 
 
 OATH, 346. 
 
 Obedience, active and passive, 130. 
 Ordination, 329, 353. 
 Original sin, 86 ; guilt, 106 ; and bap- 
 tism, 108. 
 
 PAPAL infallibility, 354. 
 Penance, 297. 
 Penances, 307. 
 Perseverance, 217. 
 Person of Christ, 116. 
 Pictures and relics, 75. 
 Pope, the, 353. 
 Prayers for the dead, 316. 
 Predestination, 161. 
 Presence, the real, 286. 
 
 Private masses, 296. 
 Purgatory, 310. 
 
 QUAKER confessions, 34. 
 
 BEADING of Scripture by laity, 57. 
 Redemption, 127 seq. 
 Reformed Church, 20. 
 Relics, 75. 
 
 Renewal and conversion, 150. 
 Repentance, 298. 
 Restoration of the cup, 289. 
 Righteousness of Christ, 181. 
 
 SACRAMENTS, 232. 
 
 Sacrifice of the Mass, 280. 
 
 Saints, invocation of, 68 ; pictures and 
 relics, 75. 
 
 Satisfaction of Christ, 138. 
 
 Satisfactions, 198. 
 
 Scripture, sufficiency of , 41 ; interpre- 
 tation, 56. 
 
 Sinlessness of Christ, 130. 
 
 Sin, mortal and venial, 219. 
 
 Sin, original, 106 ; and baptism, 108. 
 
 State, original, of man, 80 seq. 
 
 Subordination in Trinity, 63 seq. 
 
 Supererogation, 205. 
 
 Supralapsarianism, 161. 
 
 Symbola CEcumenica, 45. 
 
 Synergism, 145. 
 
 Synods, 45. 
 
 TESTAMENT, Old, its validity, 45. 
 Tradition, 41. 
 Transubstantiation, 280. 
 Trinity, 63 seq. 
 Treasure of merits, 127. 
 
 UNLEAVENED bread in Eucharist, 290. 
 
 Vows, 210, 212. 
 Vulgate, 58. 
 
 WORD and sacrament, 223. 
 Word of God, 222. 
 Works, good, 196, 198, 203. 
 Wine in Eucharist, 290. 
 
 ZWINGLIAN doctrine of the Eucha- 
 rist, 269. 
 
 MURRAY AND GIBB, EDINBURGH, 
 PKINTERS TO HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICK.
 
 T. and T. Clark 's Publications. 
 
 BIBLICO-THEOLOGICAL LEXICON OF NEW TESTAMENT GREEK. 
 CREMER. 
 
 Demy 8vo. Price 14s. 
 
 GRAMMAR OF NEW TESTAMENT GREEK. WINER. 
 
 (Translated by Rev. W. F. Moulton, one of the New Testament Revision 
 Company.) 
 
 Demy 8vo. Price 15s. 
 
 HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN COUNCILS, TO A.D. 325. HEFELE. 
 Second Edition, Demy 8vo. Price 12s. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. A.D. 1600. SCHAFF. 
 Three Volumes, Royal 8vo. Price 1, 16s. 
 
 TRIPARTITE NATURE OF MAN. HEARD. 
 
 Third Edition, Crown 8vo. Price 6s. 
 
 HISTORY OF PROTESTANT THEOLOGY. DORNER. 
 
 Two Volumes, Demy Svo. Price l, Is. 
 
 TRAINING OF THE TWELVE. BRUCE. 
 
 Demy 8uo. Price 10s. Gd. 
 
 COMMENTARY ON THE ACTS. GLOAG. 
 
 Two Volumes, Demy 8vo. Price 1, Is. 
 
 OLD CATHOLIC CHURCH. KILLEN. 
 
 Demy 8vo. Price 9s. 
 
 ARGUMENT OF EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. STEWARD. 
 Demy 8vo. Price 10s. Qd. 
 
 KRUMMACHER : AN AUTOBIOGRAPHY. 
 
 Cheap Edition, Crown 8vo. Price 6s. 
 
 LIGHT FROM THE CROSS. THOLUCK. 
 
 Third Edition, Crown 8vo. Price 5s. 
 
 SINLESSNESS OF JESUS. ULLMANN. 
 
 Third Edition, Crown 8vo. Price 6s. 
 
 BIBLICAL STUDIES ON ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL. BESSER. 
 Two Volumes, Crown 8vo. Price 12s. 
 
 OUR LORD'S SECOND ADVENT. BROWN. 
 
 Sixth Edition, Crown 8vo. Price Is. Qd. 
 
 METAPHYSIC OF ETHICS. KANT. 
 
 Third Edition, Crown Svo. Price 6s. 
 
 APOCALYPSE, TRANSLATED AND EXPOUNDED. GLASGOW. 
 Demy 8vo. Price 14s. 
 
 CHURCH OF CHRIST. BANNERMAN. 
 
 Two Volumes, Demy 8vo. Price l, Is.
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 WORKS BY THE LATE WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, D,D,, 
 
 PRINCIPAL AND PROFESSOR OF CHURCH HISTORY, NEW COLLEGE, EDINBURGH. 
 
 COMPLETE IN FOUE VOLUMES 8vo, PRICE 2, 2s. 
 
 In Two Volumes, demy 8vo, price 21s., Second Edition, 
 
 HISTORICAL THEOLOGY: 
 
 A REVIEW OP THE PRINCIPAL DOCTRINAL DISCUSSIONS IN THE 
 CHRISTIAN CHURCH SINCE THE APOSTOLIC AGE. 
 
 Chapter 1. The Church ; 2. The Council of Jerusalem ; 3. The Apostles' Creed ; 4. The 
 Apostolical Fathers; 5. Heresies of the Apostolical Age; 6. The Fathers of the 
 Second and Third Centuries ; 7. The Church of the Second and Third Centuries ; 
 8. The Constitution of the Church ; 9. The Doctrine of the Trinity ; 10. The Person 
 of Christ ; 11. The Pelagian Controversy ; 12. Worship of Saints and Images ; 
 13. The Civil and Ecclesiastical Authorities ; 14. The Scholastic Theology ; 15. The 
 Canon Law ; 16. Witnesses for the Truth during Middle Ages ; 17. The Church 
 at the Reformation ; 18. The Council of Trent ; 19. The Doctrine of the Fall ; 
 20. Doctrine of the Will ; 21. Justification ; 22. The Sacramental Principle ; 23. The 
 Socinian Controversy ; 24. Doctrine of the Atonement ; 25. The Arminian Con- 
 troversy ; 26. Church Government ; 27. The Erastian Controversy. 
 
 In demy 8vo (624 pages), price 10s. 6dL, Second Edition, 
 
 THE REFORMERS AND THE THEOLOGY 
 OF THE REFORMATION. 
 
 Chapter 1. Leaders of the Reformation ; 2. Luther ; 3. The Reformers and the Doctrine 
 of Assurance ; 4. Melancthon and the Theology of the Church of England ; 5. Zwingle 
 and the Doctrine of the Sacraments ; 6. John Calvin ; 7. Calvin and Beza ; 8. Calvin- 
 ism and Arminianism ; 9. Calvinism and the Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity ; 
 10. Calvinism and its Practical Application; 11. The Reformers and the Lessons 
 from their History. 
 ' This volume is a most magnificent vindication of the Reformation, in both its men 
 
 and its doctrines, suited to the present time and to the present state of the controversy.' 
 
 Witnctt. 
 
 In One Volume, demy 8vo, price 10s. 6d^ 
 
 DISCUSSIONS ON CHURCH PRINCIPLES: 
 
 POPISH, ERASTIAN, AND PRESBYTERIAN. 
 
 Chapter 1. The Errors of Romanism; 2. Romanist Theory of Development; 3. The 
 Temporal Sovereignty of the Pope ; 4. The Temporal Supremacy of the Pope ; 5. The 
 Liberties of the Gallican Church; 6. Royal Supremacy in Church of England; 
 7. Relation between Church and State ; 8. The Westminster Confession on Relation 
 between Church and State ; 9. Church Power ; 10. Principles of the Free Church ; 
 11. The Rights of the Christian People ; 12. The Principle of Non-Intrusion ; 
 13. Patronage and Popular Election. 
 
 In Demy 8vo, price 9s., 
 
 SERMONS, FROM 1828 TO 1860. 
 
 BY THE LATE WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, D.D., 
 
 PRINCIPAL AND PROFESSOR OF CHURCH HISTORY, NEW COLLEGE, EDINBURGH. 
 
 With Photograph. 
 Edited, with a Preface, by Rev. J. J. BONAR, Greenock. 
 
 ' We can honestly recommend these sermons of the late gifted Professor as well worthy 
 of thoughtful perusal by students and preachers. They will be found highly suggestive; 
 and if not remnrkable for elaborate polish, yet they will furnish many examples of vigor- 
 ous and forceful expression of the truth.' Watchman.
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 This day, in Two Volumes crown 8vo, price 12s. 6d., 
 
 Christian Ethics. Translated from the 
 
 German of Dr. ADOLF WUTTKE, late Professor of Theology in Halle. 
 Vol. I. History of Ethics ; Vol. II. Pure Ethics. 
 
 This work, so well known in Germany, has been translated at the recommendation of 
 Dr. Tholuck; and all critics accord in testifying that the author was a man singularly 
 endowed with keenness of philosophic insight and with devoutness of Christian faith. 
 
 ' Wuttke's Ethics should have a place in every pastor's library.' Dr. Hengstenberg. 
 
 WORKS BY DR. C. E. LUTHARDT. 
 
 In One Volume crown 8vo (in the Press), 
 
 Apologetic Lectures on the Morality of 
 
 Christianity. 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. The Nature of Christian 
 
 Morality. 
 IT. Man. 
 
 III. The Christian and the 
 
 Christian Virtues. 
 
 IV. The Devotional Life of the 
 
 Christian and his Attitude 
 towards the Church. 
 
 CHAPTER V. Christian Marriage. 
 VI. The Christian Home. 
 VII. The State and Christianity. 
 VIII. The Life of the Christians 
 
 in the State. 
 
 IX. Culture and Christianity. 
 X. Humanity and Christianity. 
 
 In One Volume crown 8vo, price 6s., 
 
 Apologetic Lectures on the Saving Truths 
 
 of Christianity. Second English, from Third German Edition. 
 
 'An eloquent and powerful exposition of the truth. . . . Whilst the author walks 
 in the old trodden paths, there is, along with a remarkable clearness of apprehension and 
 accuracy of judgment, a freshness and originality of thought and a singular beauty of 
 language, uuder the spell of which we read these lectures with unflagging interest. . . . 
 They traverse a wide field of theological inquiry.' British and Foreign Evangelical 
 Review. 
 
 ' We commend his lectures as very able. His scholarship is adequate, his spirit evan- 
 gelical and devout, and he speaks lucidly, pointedly, and tersely.' British Quarterly 
 Review. 
 
 In One Volume crown 8vo, Third Edition (in the Press), 
 
 Apologetic Lectures on the Fundamental 
 
 Truths of Christianity. 
 
 'We have never met with a volume better adapted to set forth the evidences of 
 Christianity in a form suited to the wants of our day. The whole of the vast argument 
 is illustrated by various and profound learning ; there is no obscurity in the thoughts or 
 in the style ; the language is simple, the ideas clear, and the argument logical, and 
 generally, to our mind, conclusive.' Guardian. 
 
 ' Luthardt is the very man to help those entangled in the thickets of modern rationalism ; 
 we do not know just such another book as this ; it is devout, scholarly, clear, forcible, 
 penetrating, comprehensive, satisfactory, admirable.' Evangelical Magazine.
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 Just published, in Two Volumes, Demy 8vo, price 21s., 
 
 History of the Kingdom of God under the Old Testament. 
 
 Translated from the German of E. W. HENGSTENBERG, late Doctor and 
 Professor of Theology in Berlin. 
 
 ' One of the very pleasantest books to read we have met with for a very considerable 
 time. In many respects it may be considered an Introduction to the Old Testament, so 
 comprehensive and so thorough is its treatment of the subject. . . . It is a most 
 serviceable companion to the Old Testament.' Literary Churchman. 
 
 In One Volume, Demy 8vo, price 10s. 6d. 
 
 The Prophecies of Ezekiel elucidated. By E. W. Hengstenberg, 
 
 late Doctor and Professor of Theology in Berlin. 
 
 'Professor Hengstenberg was a man of boundless energy, of immense learning, in- 
 genuity, and acuteness, and of an ardent, resolute, and persistent spirit. . . . No 
 German writer has exerted a greater influence over English theological thought, and 
 very few men have rendered greater service to Biblical truth. . . . The Commentary 
 on Ezekiel, in breadth of research and accuracy of learning, in critical acumen and 
 evangelical sentiment, is inferior to none of the aiithor's well-known works.' British 
 Quarterly Review. 
 
 In Two Volumes, Demy 8vo, price 21s., 
 
 An Introduction to the New Testament. By Friedrich Bleek, 
 
 Professor of Theology, University of Bonn. Translated from the Second 
 German Edition, by Kev. W. UKWICK, JVI.A. 
 
 ' The eminent learning and distinguished abilities of Professor Bleek make this work 
 of rare value ; and the more so as this was his favourite branch, to which he devoted 
 many years of faithful toil. . . . The whole discussion is exceedingly instructive, and 
 throws a most welcome light on the structure, relations, and characteristics of the several 
 Gospels. The laborious research of the author, his vast stores of learning, and complete 
 mastery of his subject, make it both profitable and delightful to prosecute these studies 
 with such assistance.' Princeton Review. 
 
 In Two Volumes, Demy 8vo, price 21s., 
 
 Manual of Historico-Critical Introduction to the ' Canonical 
 
 Scriptures of the Old Testament. By CARL FRIEDRICH KEIL. Translated 
 from the Second Edition, with Supplementary Notes from Bleek and 
 others, by GEORGE C. M. DOUGLAS, B.A., D.D., Professor of Hebrew, Free 
 Church College, Glasgow. 
 
 ' This is a very careful and complete treatment of the matters discussed. Dr Keil's 
 work will be invaluable to all theological students and biblical scholars.' English 
 Independent. 
 
 'We heartily commend this valuable addition to the Foreign Theological Library.' 
 British Quarterly Review. 
 
 In One handsome Vol., Demy 8vo, price 12s., Second Edition, Eevised and Enlarged, 
 
 A History of the Christian Councils, from the Original Docu- 
 ments, to the Close of the Council of Nicsea, A.D. 325. By CHARLES 
 JOSEPH HEFELE, D.D., Bishop of Rottenberg, formerly Professor of 
 Theology in the University of Tubingen. Translated from the German and 
 Edited by WILLIAM R. CLARK, M.A. Oxon., Prebendary of Wells and 
 Vicar of Taunton. 
 
 ' A work of profound erudition, and written in a most candid spirit. It deals with the 
 history of Christian Councils as far as and including the Great Council of Nice, to which, 
 indeed, about half of the work is devoted. In so rich a matter of choice, it is not easy 
 to select anything for mention, but we may say that the account of Arius and his views 
 is peculiarly valuable and interesting. The book will be a standard authority. . . . Pro- 
 testant readers may be satisfied that he puts them in a condition to form an independent 
 judgment, by an exhaustive and scrupulously fair statement of facts.' Spectator. 
 
 'Bishop Hefele's great work, the "Concilien jGeschichte," is of standard rank and 
 primary importance to historical students.' Union Review.
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 WORKS OF PATRICK FAIRBAIRN, D,D,, 
 
 PRINCIPAL AND PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY IN THE FREE CHURCH COLLEGE, GLASGOW. 
 
 In Two Volumes, demy 8vo, price 21s., Fifth Edition, 
 
 THE TYPOLOGY OF SCRIPTURE, Viewed in connection 
 
 with the whole Series of the Divine Dispensations. 
 
 1 As the product of the labours of an original thinker and of a sound theologian, who 
 has at the same time scarcely left unexamined one previous writer on the subject, ancient 
 or modern, this work will be a most valuable accession to the library of the theological 
 student. As a whole, we believe it may, with the strictest truth, be pronounced the best 
 work on the subject that has yet been published.' Record. 
 
 ' A work fresh and comprehensive, learned and sensible, and full of practical religious 
 feeling.' British and Foreign Evangelical Review. 
 
 In demy 8vo, price 10s. 6d., Third Edition, 
 
 EZEKIEL, AND THE BOOK OP HIS PROPHECY: An 
 
 Exposition ; With a New Translation. 
 
 ' A work which was greatly wanted, and which will give the author no mean place 
 among the Biblical expositors of his country and language, for in it he has cast con- 
 siderable light on one of the obscurest portions of God'd Word.' Journal of Sacred 
 Literature. 
 
 In demy 8vo, price 10s. Gd., Second Edition, 
 
 PROPHECY, Viewed in its Distinctive Nature, its Special 
 
 Functions, and Proper Interpretation. 
 
 ' We woiild express our conviction that if ever this state of things is to end, and the 
 Church is blest with the dawn of a purer and brighter day, it will be through the sober 
 and well-considered efforts of such a man as Dr. Fairbairn, and through the general 
 acceptance of some such principles as are laid down for our guidance in this book.' 
 Christian Advocate. 
 
 In demy 8vo, price 10s. 6d., 
 
 HERMENEUTICAL MANUAL; or, Introduction to the 
 
 Exegetical Study of the Scriptures of the New Testament. 
 
 1 Dr. Fairbairn has precisely the training which would enable him to give a fresh and 
 suggestive book on Hermeneutics. Without going into any tedious detail, it presents the 
 points that are important to a student. There is a breadth of view, a clearness and 
 manliness of thought, and a ripeness of learning, which make the work one of peculiar 
 freshness and interest. I consider it a very valuable addition to every student's library.' 
 Rev. Dr. Moore, Author of the able Commentary on ' The Prophets of the Restoration.' 
 
 \ 
 In demy 8vo, price 10s. 6d., 
 
 THE REVELATION OP LAW IN SCRIPTURE, considered 
 
 with respect both to its own Nature, and to its relative Place in Succes- 
 sive Dispensations. (The Third Series of the ' Cunningham Lectures.') 
 
 'Dr. Fairbairn is well known as a learned and painstaking writer, and these lectures 
 will bear out his reputation. . . . They are the writing of a man who is a laborious 
 student of the Bible, and patient readers will find that they can learn something from 
 him.' Guardian. 
 
 ' The tone and spirit of this volume are admirable. The lectures are carefully elabo- 
 rated, the arguments and scriptural illustrations seem to have passed each one under the 
 author's scrutiny ; so that, besides unity of purpose in the lectures as a whole, we mark 
 the conscientiousness that has sought to verify each separate statement. . . . It is an 
 excellent book.' Nonconformist.
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 Just Published, in Crown 8vo, Price 4a. 6d., 
 
 THE WORDS OF THE NEW 
 . . TESTAMENT, " 
 
 AS ALTERED BY TRANSMISSION, AND ASCERTAINED BY 
 MODERN CRITICISM. 
 
 FOR POPULAR USE. 
 
 BY REV. WILLIAM MILLIGAN, D.D., 
 
 PROFESSOR OF DIVINITY AND BIBLICAL CRITICISM, ABERDEEN, 
 
 AND 
 
 REV. ALEXANDER ROBERTS, D.D., 
 
 PROFESSOR OF HUMANITY, ST. ANDREWS. 
 
 In Two Handsome Volumes, Demy 8vo, Price 17s., 
 
 COMMENTARY ON THE PROPHECIES 
 OF ISAIAH. 
 
 BY JOSEPH ADDISON ALEXANDER, D.D, PRINCETON, 
 
 AUTHOR OF COMMENTARIES ON THE PSALMS, MARK, ACTS, ETC. 
 
 New and Revised Edition. 
 EDITED, WITH A PREFACE, BY JOHN EADIE, D.D., LLD. 
 
 1 1 regard Dr. Joseph Addison Alexander as incomparably the greatest man I ever 
 knew, as incomparably the greatest man our Church has ever produced.' Dr. Hodge.
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 NEW AND CHEAPER EDITION 
 
 OF 
 
 LANGE'S LIFE OF CHRIST. 
 
 Now complete, in Four Volumes demy 8vo, price 28s. 
 (Subscription Price), 
 
 THE LIFE OF THE LORD 
 JESUS CHRIST: . 
 
 A COMPLETE CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE ORIGIN, CONTENTS, 
 AND CONNECTION OF THE GOSPELS. 
 
 from tlje <&trmait of 
 
 J. P. LANGE, D. D., 
 
 PROFESSOR OP DIVINITY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BONN. 
 EDITED, WITH ADDITIONAL NOTES, 
 
 BY THE REV. MARCUS D D S, M.A. 
 
 *,* This valuable Work has been out of print for some time, but has been much 
 in demand. The Six Volumes now occupy Four ; and whilst the whole matter is 
 retained, it is published at a little cheaper price. 
 
 EXTRACT FROM EDITOR'S PREFACE. 
 
 ' The work of Dr. Lange, translated in the accompanying volumes, holds among 
 books the honourable position of being the most complete Life of our Lord. 
 There are other works which more thoroughly investigate the authenticity of 
 the Gospel records, some which more satisfactorily discuss the chronological 
 difficulties involved in this most important of histories, and some which present 
 a more formal and elaborate exegetical treatment of the sources ; but there is 
 no single work in which all these branches are so fully attended to, or in which 
 so much matter bearing on the main subject is brought together, or in which so 
 many points are elucidated. The immediate object of this comprehensive and 
 masterly work was to refute those views of the life of our Lord which had been 
 propagated by Negative Criticism, and to substitute that authentic and consistent 
 history which a truly scientific and enlightened criticism educes from the Gospels.'
 
 T. and T. Clark's Publications. 
 
 M E Y E R'S 
 
 Commentary on the New Testament. 
 
 MESSRS. CLARK beg to announce that they have in course of 
 preparation a Translation of the well-known and justly esteemed 
 
 By Dr. H. A. W. MEYER, 
 OBERCONSISTORIALRATH, HANOVER, 
 
 Of which they hope to publish in October 
 
 ROMANS, Vol. I. 
 GALATIANS, One Volume. 
 
 The Subscription will be. 21s. for Four Volumes Demy 8vo. 
 
 By arrangement with Dr. MEYER, Messrs. Clark have obtained the sole right 
 of translation into English, and they will also have the very great advantage 
 of Dr. Meyer's latest emendations. In order to secure perfect accuracy, the 
 Publishers have placed the whole work under the editorial care of Rev. Dr. 
 DICKSON, Professor of Biblical Criticism in the University of Glasgow. 
 
 The Volumes will vary in number of pages according to the size of the 
 original, but an average of about 400 pages may be assumed. Each Volume 
 will be sold separately at (on an average) 10s. 6d. to Non- Subscribers. 
 
 It is obvious that the Series cannot be published with the regularity of the 
 Foreign Theological Library, as in many cases the Publishers must wait for 
 Dr. METER'S Notes. 
 
 Intending Subscribers will be kind enough to fill up the accompanying 
 Form, which may be returned, either direct to the Publishers at 38 George 
 Street, Edinburgh, or through their own Booksellers. . 
 
 Mr. 
 
 BOOKSELLER, 
 
 Will please enter my Name as a Subscriber, and forward, as published, 
 the above Translation of 
 
 MEYER'S COMMENTARIES.
 
 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 A 000032185 1