352 B6 IC-NRLF s LOCATION OF LA SALLE'S COLONY ON THE GULF OF MEXICO BY HERBERT E. BOLTON REPRINTED FROM 'Southwestern Historical Quarterly, XXVII, 171-189 AUSTIN, TEXAS THE LOCATION OF LA SALLE'S COLONY ON THE GULF OF MEXICO* HERBERT E. BOLTON One of the unsettled points in the history of La Salle's career in America has been the exact location of the colony which he established temporarily on the shores of the Gulf of Mexico in 1685. The view held my Parkman and most other writers has been that the site was on the Lavaca river, but from this opinion some have dissented, while others have been in doubt because of the inadequacy of the available data. 1 The question is de- batable no longer, for it is settled once for all by newly discov- ered records in the archives of Spain, which have been corrob- orated by archeological and topographical investigation. In order to put this new evidence in its proper setting, it seems desirable to review briefly the main features of the well- known story of La Salle's enterprise. In 1682 La Salle descended the Mississippi to its mouth and conceived the idea of founding there a colony in the name of the king of France. In writing of his purposes, historians generally have laid the chief emphasis upon La Salle's desire to control and develop the valley of the Mississippi, and through that stream to establish connection with Canada. But La Salle had other purposes which were equally or even more prominent in his plans. French explorers in the in- terior of North America had long dreamed of finding a way to the much talked of mines of northern Mexico. France and Spain *This article is reprinted with the courteous permission of the editor of the Mississippi Valley Historical Review, in which it appeared. Sep- tember, 1915 (Volume II, 165-182). Parkman writes: "It was on the river which he named La Vache, now the Lavaca, which enters the head of Matagorda Bay" (La> Salle and the Discovery of the Great West [Boston, 1910], 391-392). The same view is held by H. H. Bancroft (North Mexican States and Texas [San Francisco, 1886], I, 402); G. P. Garrison (Texas [Boston, 1903], 22); and R. C. Clark (The Beginnings of Texas [Austin, 1907], 18). On their maps Garrison and Clark both place the French fort east of the stream. Miss Eleanor Buckley, in a scholarly discussion, concludes that the fort was on Lavaca, but shows, correctly, that it was not on the left bank. (Texas State Historical Association Quarterly, XV, 57-60.) W. Kingsford (The History of Canada [London, 1888], II, 137-138) concludes that the settle- ment was probably on Galveston Bay and certainly not on Matagorda. For other views see post, 179. 589845 172 ' 'Southwestern Historical Quarterly were continually at war or on the verge of war, and at the very time when La Salle descended the Mississippi French buccaneers were scouring the waters of the gulf and making raids upon the Spanish settlements of Florida. In the course of the next year French corsairs three times sacked the Spanish settlement of Apalache. Thus France and Spain were competing for the con- trol of the northern shores of the Gulf of Mexico, and of this competition La Salle's project was a part. When he returned to France, therefore, La Salle proposed to establish a colony on the gulf, not only as a means of controlling the Mississippi valley and the northern gulf shore, but also as a base of attack, in case of war, upon the Spanish treasure fleets and upon the northern provinces of Mexico. These purposes La Salle plainly set forth in his proposals to the king, and on these terms his plans were approved by Louis XIV. 2 The colony of some four hundred people left France in the summer of 1684, and in the autumn reached the West Indies, the ketch of St. Francois having been captured by the Spaniards on the way. While in the West Indies La Salle was gravely ill, but he recovered his health and in November continued his voyage. For reasons which have never been fully explained, the mouth of the Mississippi was missed and a landing made near Pass Cavallo, on Matagorda bay. 3 Some students have maintained that the passing of the Mississippi was not accidental, but designed by La Salle, in order better to attack the Spanish provinces of Mexico. This view, however, seems unwarranted. 4 After reaching Matagorda bay the expedition went rapidly to pieces. A landing had scarcely been made when some of the colonists died from sickness and others were killed by the In- dians. In the attempt to enter the bay, the Aimable was wrecked. Beaujeu, the naval commander, had quarreled with La Salle from 2 See documents in P. Margry, Decouvertes et etablissements des frangais dans I'ouest et dans le sud de I'Amerique Septentrionale, 1614-1698 (Paris, 1878), II, 288-301, 359-369; III, 17-28. Also G. Gravier, Cavelier de la Salle de Rouen (Paris, 1871), 96-97. '"Relation de Henri Joutel," in Margry, Decouvertes, III, 91-146. 4 For the view that the passing of the Mississippi was by mistake see Parkman, La Salle and the Discovery of the Great West, 376; Gravier, Cavelier de la Salle de Rouen, 100; Justin Winsor, Cartier to Frontenac (Boston, 1894), 313; Bancroft, North Mexican States and Texas, I, 399; Jared Sparks, Robert Cavelier de la Salle (Boston, 1844), 130; E. T. Location of La Salle's Colony On Gulf of Mexico 173 the beginning, and from Pass Cavallo he sailed back to France with the Joly, carrying away some of the soldiers and a large quantity of much needed supplies. Tonty, La Salle's lieutenant, by agreement descended the Mississippi to meet him at the mouth, but of course did not find him, and therefore gave him no aid. To make the best of a bad situation, La Salle moved his colony to a better site near the head of Lavaca bay and began a series of expeditions to the eastward in the hope of finding the Missis- sippi river, which he thought to be near. While engaged in ex- ploring the eastern portion of Matagorda bay, the Belle, the last of La Salle's four vessels, was wrecked and left stranded on the inner shoals of Matagorda peninsula. 5 On his third expedition northeastward La Salle, with a few companions, made his way to the Cenis Indians on the Neches, and to the Nasoni north of Nacogdoches. But here he was forced by desertion and sickness to retrace his steps, and he returned to the settlement at Mata- gorda bay. 6 The colony by this time had dwindled down to a mere handful, and succor was imperative or extermination cer- tain. Again the intrepid explorer set forth with a few compan- ions, in an attempt to reach Canada. Crossing the Colorado near Columbus, he made his way to the Brazos, which he passed just above the mouth of the Navasota. Here a quarrel arose among his followers, in the course of which Moranget, La Salle's nephew, was slain by his companions while hunting for supplies which La Salle had cached in the vicinity during the previous expe- dition. 7 To save their own necks, when La Salle reached the scene of the murder the conspirators slew him as they had slain Moran- get. Historians have supposed that this act was committed near the Trinity or the Neches, but evidence now available makes it quite clear that the spot was between the Brazos and Navasota Miller, "The connection of Penalosa with the La Salle Expedition," in Texas State Historical Association Quarterly, V, 97-112. For a contrary view see J. G. Shea, The Expedition of Don Diego Dionisi de Penalosa (New York, 1882), 22; Charlevoix, History and General Description of 'New France (J. G. Shea, tr. New York, 1866-1872), IV, 68-69. "'Relation de Hen'ri Joutel," in Margry, Decouvertes, III, 163-226, passim. M. G. Shea, Discovery and Exploration of the Mississippi Valley (Albany. 1903), 201-205. '"Relation de Henri Joutel," in Margry, Decouvertes, III, 260-325. 174 Southwestern Historical Quarterly. rivers, and near the present city of Navasota. 8 To L'Archeveque, at least, poetic justice was meted out in full measure, as the scholar Bandelier has shown. Being picked up by the Spaniards and taken to Monclova, L'Archeveque became a citizen of New Mexico, and, in 1720, a third of the century after the assassina- tion of La Salle, he was killed by the Indian allies of the French, while taking part in a Spanish expedition to Kansas. 9 From the Navasota river the survivors of La Salle's party continued eastward to the Cenis and Nasoni. Here some de- serted, but others, including Joutel and La Salle's brother, Abbe Jean Cavelier, made their way across the Eed river to the mouth of the Arkansas, 10 to Tonty's post on the Illinois, and to Canada. From Tonty they concealed the news of the tragedy which had occurred in the wilds of Texas, but he learned the truth through Indians, and in the fall of 1689 made a second voyage down the Mississippi in an effort to rescue the colonists. Crossing Louisiana to the Natchitoches, he ascended the Eed river to the Caddo, and then made his way southwest for eighty leagues to the Nouaydiche, a village of Indians living near the Neches. But here, for lack of aid and guides, and, it is said, hearing of the approach of De Leon, he was forced to give up the search. Accordingly, he purchased horses from the Indians and returned to Canada. Meanwhile the little colony on the gulf dwindled down to a mere handful. Many of the people died of smallpox. Finally, early in the year 1689, four years after the colony had landed, most of the survivors were slain by their savage neighbors, the 8 The correctness of this conclusion is clear to any one who reads Joutel's journal in the light of contemporary Spanish sources and of established ethnological data regarding the Hasinai Indians. ( See Bolton, "The Nativ e Tribes About the East Texas Missions," in the Texas State Historical Association Quarterly, XI, 249-276.) New light on the operations of La Salle on Matagorda Bay and during his last journeys is shed by the declaration made before the viceroy in Mexico City by Pedro Muni (Pierre Meusnier), one of the Frenchmen picked up in Texas by De Le6n in 1690. He had been with La Salle on his last expedition' and had remained in Eastern Texas. Incidentally he confirms by a positive statement the present writer's conclusions, reached some years ago, that La Salle's death occurred on the Brazos (EspJritu Santo) river. Testimonio de Autos en orderi a las diligencias y resulta de ellas para la entrada por tierra a los Parages de la Bahia del Espfritu Santo. Manuscript in archive general de Indias, Sevilla, estante 61, cajon 6, legajo 21. "See A. F. A. Bandelier, The Gilded Man (New York, 1873), 299-300. ""Relation de Henri Joutel," in Margry, Decouvertes, III. 325-436. Location of La Salle's Colony On Gulf of Mexico 175 Karankawa Indians. In the course of the next few years five children and four men were picked up in various parts of Texas by Spaniards, taken to Mexico, imprisoned, or otherwise disposer. of. 11 Just a quarter of a century later two of the boys, Jean and Eobert Talon, reappeared in Texas as guides of the famous St. Denis, when in 1714 he made his historic journey from Natch- itoches to the Eio Grande. 12 Such in outline is the story of La Salle's unfortunate colony. Much of what we know of it is learned through the records of Spanish expeditions sent out in search of it. News of La Salle's voyage to the Mississippi was acquired through the capture of a French corsair off the coast of Yucatan in September, 1684. Soon Spanish parties were sent forth by land and sea to find and eject the intruders. In 1687 the wrecks of the Aimable and the Belle were seen by members of two of these expeditions, who took from them four pieces of artillery "and three painted fleurs de lis." They concluded that the French colony had been com- pletely destroyed; 13 but, to make certain, overland expeditions were sent out from Monterey and Monclova, then the principal outposts on the northeastern frontier of New Spain. The leader of these expeditions was Alonso de Leon, the ablest frontiersman of his district. In 1686 and again in 1687 he made his way to the Eio Grande and explored it to its mouth, looking for the French. Hearing in 1688 of a strange white man dwelling among the Indians north of the Eio Grande, he crossed it near Eagle Pass and found a lone Frenchman ruling single-handed a large confederacy of savages. The Frenchman was captured by strate- "Letter of Alonso de Le6n to the viceroy of Mexico, May 18, 1680, in Buckingham Smith, Colecdon de Varios Documentos Para la Historic* de la Florida (London, 1857), 25-27; "Interrogations fait a Pierre et Jean Talon," in Margry, Decouvertes, III, 610-621; Alonso de Leon, Historia de Nuevo Leon, edited by Genaro Garcia (Mexico, 1909), ch. 34-45. ^Manuscript correspondence of St. Denis with the mission' authorities of San Juan Bautista t 1714, and of Santa Cruz de Quergtaro. 13 Cardenas, Ensayo cronologico para la historia general de la Florida (Madrid, 1723), 268, 283; junta de guerra de Yndias, a 22 de marzo de 1691. Acordada el mismo dia. Representa a vuestra magestad lo que se le ofrece en vista del papel que escribio Don An'dres de Fez, sobre fortifkar la Bahia de Panzacola. Don Antonio Ortiz de Otalara. c. March 22, 1691. Manuscript in archive general de Indias, estante 61, cajon 6, legajo 21. 176 Southwestern Historical Quarterly gem and taken to Mexico; in 1689 he returned as guide to De Leon, now on his fourth expedition in search of La Salle's colony. 14 Making his way to the northern shores of Lavaca bay, De Leon found the ruins of the French settlement,, rescued from the In- dians a few survivors, held a conference with an Indian chief from the Neches river, and returned to Mexico. Next year he was sent on a fifth expedition, instructed to destroy the French fort and to aid Father Massanet in founding missions on the Neches, where it was feared the French might reappear, and where the friars had long dreamed of establishing the faith. The French fort was burned, and the bay was again visited. 15 In the summer of 1690 De Leon returned to Monclova and reported what he had done. Among other things he stated that in the bay, a short distance from the mouth of the stream on which the French colony had been established, he had seen two buoys which were not there the year before and could hardly have been placed there by the Indians. 16 So serious was the matter regarded that a council of war was held in Mexico to consider it, for it was feared that the buoys might mark the entrance to some channel in which other French vessels were lurking, or to which they might return. It was resolved, therefore, that they should be destroyed; the method of their destruction was left to be de- termined by the viceroy. 17 The viceroy not only desired to learn who had left the buoys, and to protect the bay, but was even more concerned to estab- lish a water route to the missions which had been established "Alonso de Le6n, Historia de Nuevo Leon, ch. 34-45 ; E. Portillo, Apuntes para la Mstoria antigua de Coahuila y Texas (Saltillo, 1886), 224-238; Clark, Beginnings of Texas, 9-27. 15 Letter of Damian Massanet to Don Carlos de Sigiienza, in the Texas State Historical Association Quarterly, II, 281-312; Alonso de Le6n, "Itiner- ary of the expedition made by General Alonso de Le6n, 1689," in ibid., VIII, 203-224; De Le6n, Diario of 1690, manuscript. 16 De Le6n, Diario of 1690, entry for April 26, manuscript; declaration of Gregorio de Salinas, August 19, 1690, 'manuscript in Testimonio de autos en orden a las diligencias. "The junta general was held on August 29, 1690. In it were consid- ered De Le6n''s reports and certain declarations given in Mexico a few days before. It was stated that since it appears "by the diary that two buoys or anchors have been seen in the mouth of the entrance of the Rio de San Marcos, which is in the bay of Esplritu Santo, and which appear to be a mark for its entrance; and considering in view of all the foregoing proceedings that every mark, demonstration, or sign which might give an Location of La Salle's Colony On Gulf of Mexico .177 on the Neches. 18 In September, therefore, he sent out an expedi- tion to investigate these points. A ship was equipped for three months, provided with a launch and a canoe, manned with sixty soldiers and sailors, and put in charge of Captain Francisco de Llanos, an officer in the West Indian fleet. With him went Gre- gorio de Salinas, who had been with De Leon on his last expe- dition, and who was now put in charge of the land operations. 19 As pilot the viceroy appointed Juan de Triana, an expert in the navigation of the gulf. As master of the fortification and map- maker went Manuel Joseph de Cardenas y Magana, who had shown skill in the building of the great prison fortress of San Juan de Ulua, still standing near Vera Cruz. Before coming to Mexico he had served two years in the presidio of Cadiz, and one in the West Indian fleet. 20 indication of the slightest danger ought to be destroyed and removed; this junta sees no objection' to having this done; but it is resolved that the method and time of the measures necessary for it be reserved to the provi- dence of his excellency, to the end that he may be pleased to give the orders which to him may appear most suited to his zeal." Testimonio de Autos en orden a las diligencias. 18 In his decreto of November 12, 1690, the viceroy, after reviewing the action of the junta regarding the. removal of the buoys, adds that 'Jiore potent motives were the report that there were four Frenchmen among the Texans who might have come from New France, or from another settle- ment nearer; the difficulty and expense of traveling by land six hundred or seven hundred leagues through a hostile country; the knowledge of a large river entering the bay of Espfritu Santo (or San Bernardo) which might pass close to the newly established mission; and it being cheaper and easier to send expeditions from Vera Cruz. (Testimonio de las dili- gencias egecutadas para quitar las Boyas 6 Valisas en el Lago de San Bernardo, que llaman Bahia del Espfritu Santo. Manuscript in' archivo general