SERMON S, ACADEMICAL AND OCCASIONAL BY THE REV. JOHN KEBLE, M.A. VICAR OF HURSLEY, AND LATE FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE, OXFORD. Thou shaft no more be haughty because of My holy mountain. Zephaniah iii. 17. SECOND EDITION. OXFORD, JOHN HENRY PARKER ; F. AND J. RTVINGTON, LONDON I848/ BAXTER, PRINTER, OXFORD. TO THE REVEREND WILLIAM NICHOLAS DARNELL, B.D. SOMETIME TUTOR OF CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD, NOW RECTOR OF STANHOPE IN THE BISHOPRIC OF DURHAM, THIS VOLUME IS INSCRIBED, IN EVER-GRATEFUL MEMORY OF INVALUABLE HELPS AND WARNINGS, RECEIVED FROM HIM IN EARLY YOUTH BY HIS FAITHFUL FRIEND AND SERVANT, THE AUTHOR. r * B378 PREFACE, ON THE PRESENT POSITION OF ENGLISH CHURCHMEN. THE Discourses which are here collected, all of them, profess and endeavour more or less to take a popular view of certain great ecclesiastical sub- jects, to which of late years our attention has been providentially drawn. It will not then be out of place, to introduce them with some few remarks on the kind of evidence to which they appeal, and the principles which ought to guide the judgment of such as may be likely to read them, on the points which now unhappily are most debated among us. I do not mean points merely specu- lative, but practical questions of duty, arising out of our relation, as individual members, to the Body of Christ, which is His Church. For it is a sad truth, that no one of us is safe from being called on, at any moment, to e^rcise something like a judgment of his own, on rnatters which in better times would have been indisputably b 11 PREFACE. settled for him. If we are spared external persecu- tion, and escape trials of our faith and courage, we are tempted perhaps more severely than the early Christians on the side of intellectual pride and wil- lfulness. Our guide is comparatively out of sight, and we are the more tempted to be our own guides ; and all thoughtful persons know how that must end. Yet it is certain by our Lord's express promise, that if we have but " a good will to do His Will" unreservedly, we " shall know of the doctrine ;" sooner or later, " God will reveal unto us" that wherein we are "otherwise minded V Our Saviour spoke it of those who were not yet Christians, St. Paul of Christians whose creed was yet imperfect. The two promises together seem to provide for all cases. It cannot be imagined that they pass over the very distressing case, now unhappily so frequent among us, of persons believing the Holy Catholic Church, but doubting more or less of their own place within it. Amidst all our care, and per- plexity, whether for ourselves, or those dear to us, or entrusted to our care, we are graciously permitted to repose with undoubting faith on this one most merciful assurance, that sincere goodness will in the end find its home in the place from whence it came. The pure in heart shall finally see God. Having this faith at the bottom of our hearts, in the firm and humble purpose to do and suffer all that He may clearly reveal to be His will, we * St. John vii. 17; Philipp. iii. 15. PREFACE. Ill may address ourselves calmly,, without consterna- tion or amazement,, to the inquiry, whether He has clearly revealed the course which He approves in the emergency now imagined. For the conduct of such inquiry, I am now about to suggest a few leading thoughts : not professing to argue out any of the points, but simply to set them down as worthy of grave consideration. A dutiful person in the English Church, we will suppose, has in some way been made aware of the sayings and feelings of good Roman Catholics con- cerning her ; and with the fact, that some of those sayings meet with more or less countenance in antiquity : or he has come to be greatly impressed with the sanctity and other attractions undeniably existing in the communion of Rome : and the thought begins to haunt him, " What if her exclu- sive claim be true ? What if it should prove, that as yet I have been living without the pale of Christ's Kingdom ?" How is he to deal with such misgivings ? Shall he suppress them with a strong hand, as he would impure or murderous thoughts ? It would be hard to prove him wrong in doing so. It would be hard, very hard, to overbear the claim of something like natural piety, urging on us that it is an undutiful thing to doubt whether she be our real Mother, who has ever professed to be so, and who has done a mother's part by us, b2 IV PREFACE. from childhood until now. As in families it would be a wild and unnatural supposition, for any one of the children to begin doubting, whether their reputed parents are their real ones ; arguing the point, and requiring demonstration of it : as it is a thing from which we recoil even in fictitious stories, counting it an extravagant and unreal device : so and much more in so serious an affair as this, by how much it is more shocking to undervalue God's mysterious and heavenly gifts, than those which relate to this world only. And if any, through their own or other's neglect, have grown up among us (alas, that the case should be so common!) unconscious of their spiritual Mother's care, and unwarned of their duty towards her, and so should have fallen into grievous sin : how much more miserable to think that they should make this their undutifulness a plea for disloyalty, and say in effect, "You did not keep me in order, therefore I disown you !" Who can deny that there may be, on the one hand, so devout and unwearied an use of the means of grace offered among us, that for the person so favoured to indulge in doubt and misgiving would be simple ingratitude and irreverence, and therefore in such an one not imaginable : on the other hand, such open neglect of them, as to make the very act of comparing and judging profane ? In both those cases, then, it seems a plain duty to reject scruples before they be meddled with : and if in these two PREFACE. V extreme cases it be a duty, how should it be a sin in those which are intermediate ? which, partaking alternately of both, suggest to the conscience con- tinually one of two thoughts : either, " If I were always as good as I sometimes feel that I might be, I should have no temptation to doubt :" or, " Until I am a great deal better than I now am, I have no right to dwell on doubts." For reasons like these, a person would not seem blameable, perhaps we might well judge his course the most reasonable of any, who should bring himself to reject all scruples concerning our Church with a strong moral abhorrence, as he would any other evil imagination. But it is not every one, perhaps, who could bring himself to do so ; and many, moreover, being more or less answerable for others, may be bound in charity to consider the special matter of their misgivings, and to be pro- vided with some sufficient solution of them : suffi- cient, I mean, to direct a simple man's practice, not necessarily sufficient to silence an acute man's objections. Those who have learning and leisure may be referred to the many learned and pious Apologists, by whose labour, from Hooker downwards, the cause of the English Church, apart from that of mere Protestantism, has been providentially illus- trated and defended. If any thing to be said in this Preface, or in the Sermons which follow, sound as if spoken in disparagement of them and of their VI PREFACE. cause, the writer most heartily disavows it, and wishes it, so far, unwritten. But what are those many to do, who are obviously unable to enter on the task of examining controversial works ? Happily we have not far to seek for principles, real, weighty, and powerful in themselves, and in their application sufficiently clear, to guide such persons along the narrow way. Englishmen of ordinarily good edu- cation have been led of late years, I may say pro- videntially, to the pages of Bishop Butler, as to a never-failing help in their struggles against practical unbelief: and from the very nature of the case, we cannot be wrong in applying his rules to the doubts now mentioned, which tend, in their measure, to unbelief. What are those rules ? Without pretending to any great exactness of statement, we may say in general, that they are such as the following : That in practical matters of eternal import, the " safer way" (rightly under- standing that term) is always to be preferred, even though the excess of seeming evidence may tell in any degree on the opposite side. Thus, if one mode of acting imply that there is an eternity, and another contradict it ; though we suppose a mind utterly incapable of comprehending the evidence for it, and quite awake to the objections and diffi- culties, still the tremendous, overwhelming interest at stake ought to determine a man's conduct to the affirmative side. He should act, in spite of seeming evidence, as if eternity were true. PREFACE. Vll Another rule will be, that in estimating theological statements, no account need be taken of objections, which apply as well to acknowledged facts in God's natural and moral government, as to those which are in dispute. For example ; a priori objections to the general doctrine of mediation are cancelled at once by the observation, that God has made the natural good of His creatures to depend in so great a degree on the voluntary interference and instru- mentality of other creatures. On the other hand, (and this may be set down as a third rule,) any positive analogies to actual experience which we may be enabled to point out, may reasonably tell towards confirming our faith in a system which has stood the two former tests. Thus, the relation of Judaism to Christianity having been accepted upon its proper evidence, it is an allowable satisfaction, and reasonably adds to our full conviction of the doctrine, to reflect on the analogy which it bears to God's providential educa- tion of individuals, by childhood and youth train- ing them up to manhood. These, as all men know, are some of the chief principles, whereby such writers as Butler and Pascal have maintained Christianity against unbe- lief. Why may we not apply them as well to the maintenance of orthodoxy against heresy ? or (which comes to the same thing) to the practical guidance of individual consciences among different schools within the Church ? Vlll PREFACE. I am aware indeed that a feeling exists, which would limit the principles in question to the con- troversy with unbelievers, and would explain some of the sad misunderstandings which prevail, by ascribing them to an attempt to settle debates among Churchmen by appeal to these maxims ; which are allowed to be sound in themselves, but supposed irrelevant to our case. But, in the first place, Bishop Butler himself was clearly not aware of any such limitation. He says, broadly and without all exception, " To us, proba- bility is the very guide of life." He maintains, that when a person is in suspense about religion, " it ought in all reason, considering its infinite import- ance, to have nearly the same influence upon prac- tice, as if it were thoroughly believed. For," he adds, " would it not be madness for a man to forsake a safe road, and prefer to it one in which he acknow- ledges there is an even chance he should lose his life, though there were an even chance likewise of his getting safe through it ?" Further ; he applies his principles to the settlement of matters debated among those who profess to receive the Scrip- tures : such as the nature and degrees of Inspira- tion, the use of Tradition, the doctrine of Vicarious Suffering. In the next place, the distinction alleged is far from self-evident. The three rules above specified lose nothing of their axiomatic force, when con- templated with a view (e. g.) to the Predestinarian PREFACE. IX controversy, or to those which regard Church government, rather than to those which Bishop Butler had directly in his thoughts. At least, if such be the case, it requires to be distinctly shewn why and how. The burden of proof lies on the opponent. The rules themselves profess to be grounded on the essential conditions of human life and practice, not on any circumstances in the matters which Butler applies them to : and if any part of life claim to be exempted from them, the exemption surely ought to be specially made out. In the absence of clear explanation on this matter, may we not suspect without unfairness, that it is not so much any argumentative difficulty, as certain uneasy feelings, which have prompted the scruple ? It was hastily concluded, perhaps, that the principles of Pascal and Butler, carried out, would tell practically in favour of Rome : the very contradictory of which, as I shall endeavour presently to shew, is the truth, in regard at least of English Churchmen. Or there was an unwillingness to acquiesce in any thing (to use Butler's expression) so " poor." It is naturally enough surmised, that an earnest living faith, in those details especially of Catholic Truth, which bear most immediately on personal religion, can hardly be built up upon statements so guarded and hesitating : much in the same way as a traveller would shrink beforehand from venturing on a road, whose foundation is mere X PREFACE. quaking moss and turf; which nevertheless ex- perience has proved secure and available. Thus a prejudice has always existed against Bishop Butler's argument, among those who most long for somewhat of inspiration, and watch most eagerly for direct tokens from above : a prejudice which of course exerts and realizes itself more, as the argument comes to touch more nearly on those transcendental and affecting truths, whereby Faith, if one may so say, lives and moves and has her being b . " Possibly," " perhaps," " why should it not be so ?" these and other like forms of speech, sound strangely cold and unmeaning to young and ardent spirits, trained to throw them- selves, wholly and undoubtingly, on sacred words, which come to them with a thrilling conviction of the very doctrines which they now hear so languidly spoken of. It is a generous and de- votional feeling ; still it is feeling, not reason, and proceeds on an inadequate view of the necessary imperfection of this our mortal state. Objectors of a somewhat different class may not improbably complain, that they are urged to believe certain doctrines, on the strength of certain analogies and figures, which for aught they know may be mere play of imagination. This makes them jealous and impatient : they wait not to con- sider the proper force of such topics, in confirming known truths and meeting objections, but discard b Compare Anal. p. 2. c. v. . 3. p. 273, 4. PREFACE. XI them altogether, as alien to the clear light of the Gospel: forgetting that the great reasoner himself has plainly declared, that the proper force of analogy lies in answering objections, and that when positive, it is merely subsidiary to more direct arguments. Yet a very little consideration will make it ob- vious, that by thus excepting against probabilities and analogies, men are in fact indefinitely narrow- ing the reach and extent of Faith as a principle of action. They are limiting it to a few great and trying moments and occasions : whereas it is clearly spoken of in Scripture as the mainspring of our ordinary life. For how few comparatively are the instances, in which men are able to act without any doubt or misgiving at all, or any notion that something may be said on both sides ! Now all but such cases, on the hypothesis now mentioned, are taken out of the province of Faith. And how is this consistent with holy Scrip- ture ? since " hope which is seen is not hope :" and " faith is the substance," the realizing, " of things hoped for," the " evidence, or making ven- ture," of things not seen. When objects therefore, either earthly or heavenly, present themselves to the mind as distinctly as though they were seen, there is no room any longer for either hope or faith, properly so called. To say that probability, as opposed to intuition or demonstration, is the very guide of life and duty ; in other words, that moral questions must be decided by moral not Xll PREFACE. mathematical evidence ; so far from excluding the action of a generous faith, is the only statement which gives faith unlimited scope. Again : to urge on a person the wisdom and duty of taking " the safe way," may sound indeed at first like cold calculation, but is practically a principle of faith, since it must ever issue in preferring eternity to time. Perhaps too, even metaphysically, it may imply a righteous Governor of the world : for how can there be any comparison of safe or unsafe, if all be left at random ? And granting the comparison, why should we trust our own impressions about it, except through an in- stinctive faith in the veracity of one who caused us to have such impressions ? Who knows but the like instinct may lie at the foundation of the whole way of reasoning from analogy ? Bishop Butler has put the question without solving it, " Whence it proceeds that likeness should beget that presumption, opinion, and full conviction, which the human mind is formed to receive from it, and which it does necessarily produce in every one ?" It seems not unnatural to say to one's self, Perhaps the tendency may arise from an instinct, unconsciously recognising His Presence and Power, Who actuates all things, and moves them by general laws. For example, our faith in the course of nature, in our own senses, or in our personal identity, when we come really to consider it, is scarcely intelligible but as faith in the God of PREFACE. Xlll Nature, " the same yesterday, and to-day, and for ever." And so the very notion of reasoning at all from analogy may seem to stand on a religious basis. There may possibly be other and deeper ob- jections to the proposed application of Bishop Butler's principles, which also may be met on the other side by deeper and more searching replies. But it may not be useless thus briefly to have noticed these popular misapprehensions. Let us now revert to the first of them, which alone needs to be here examined in detail. An apprehension then exists, that the principle of taking at all events " the safer way," being applied to our controversy with Roman Catholics, tells prima facie against the Anglican side. The Roman statement, put broadly and coarsely, is as follows. It is allowed by English Catholic Divines, such as Hooker, that a Roman Catholic, walking dutifully in the ways of his Church, is unquestion- ably within the kingdom and covenant of Christ, and therefore in a safe way, by God's mercy, towards everlasting salvation. On the other side, Roman theologians do by no means make the same concession to the English Church : they merely allow her sincere members the same plea of invin- cible ignorance, which they do not deny to the most uninstructed of the heathen. Upon this it is argued, and there is in the argument an air of XIV PREFACE. downright common sense, not unattractive to the English mind especially : " The good Roman Catholic is safe, by consent of both parties : not so the good English Catholic : therefore a prudent person will lose no time in ranging himself on the side of the former." The slightest consideration, however, shews, that the argument put in this form proves too much : for it would equally shew that Puritanism, or Mahometanism, or the ancient Donatism, or any other exclusive system, is the safer way : since we, I suppose, should not hesitate to hope and pro- nounce favourably of sincere and good persons, living and dying Puritans, or even Mahometans, simply through invincible ignorance : but they would stiffly, I imagine, deny that we, continuing as we are, could have any portion in God's mercy. This should be enough, surely, to prevent any, even the simplest, from being overpowered by the mere boldness of a system more exclusive than that to which himself belongs. But there is more than this, it may be urged, in the statement we are now considering. The advocates for change may say, that they proceed not upon their own assertions, but upon our free concessions. " You enumerate," they may allege, "certain conditions of salvation; faith in the Creeds, partaking of the Sacraments, communion with the visible Church ; all which we plainly have, and many rites and doctrines besides, which PREFACE. XV you must either affirm to be ordinarily contrary to salvation, as some extreme controversialists on your side do, or else you cannot escape the infer- ence, that ours is the safer way, the way to be chosen upon Butler's and Pascal's rule." This being, as it is hoped, no unfair represent- ation of the argument, I ask, Do not all generous minds feel in it, before examination, something unsatisfactory ? Does it not give a cold, dry, hard interpretation to the term " safer way," reminding one rather of a dextrous diplomatist insisting on the literal terms of a treaty, than of a loyal and affectionate son and subject, committing himself unreservedly to the King and Father of all ? In fact, when we come to analyse it, it clearly assumes the utilitarian theory of morals. It assumes that the greatest discernible good of the individual is the proper measure, to him, of right and wrong. Whereas if we grant a righteous Governor of the world, the " safe way" of course must be, not what is visibly best for ourselves, but what is most pleasing to Him most apparently on His side in the great conflict between good and evil. We must bind ourselves by an unchangeable rule, never to do evil that good may come ; no not for the seeming certainty of the greatest good, the eternal salvation of our brethren's souls and our own. We must make up our minds to suspect all such appearances, however plausible, and count them fallacious, if they involve a contradiction of a plain XVI PREFACE. moral duty. As the Apostle says, (may it be permitted without irreverence so to apply sacred words ? ) " Though we, or an Angel from Heaven, preach any other Gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." To some this will sound as if we were fairly giving up the principle of the " safer way :" but it is not really so. We are merely allowing for an additional element, which the nature of the case requires, in the calculation by which we judge of " safety :" additional, I mean, to those which Butler and Pascal had chiefly to contemplate. They had to deal in the first place with such as denied eternity : and so far, the bare statement of terms was enough to indicate the " safe way." But here Eternity is granted, and we have to choose among conflicting systems, each professing to secure happiness in it. And being by supposition incompetent to decide upon the masses of direct evidence, which these systems severally allege, we look to analogy for further help in determining "the safe way ;" and we find it altogether confirming the impression to which unbiassed instinct would lead us : viz. that the world being under moral govern- ment, the " safe way" in uncertain cases must be that which is most agreeable to the duties we are before certain of. "He that is willing to do His will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God." PREFACE. XV11 On this principle, neither the Roman nor any other communion would be the "safe way" to a person who could not enter into it without involving himself in moral guilt: if, for instance, it were required as a condition of his baptism that he should confess a crime, whereof he knows himself to be innocent. What could such an one do, but continue formally excommunicate, and hope that in the sight of God he was virtually not so ? Cases again may be conceived affecting practice, in which the seeming logical or historical evidence may tell almost wholly on one side, yet it may be clearly right to prefer the other, by reason of some moral instinct, which comes in and will not let itself be unfelt. Suppose a man's parent accused of any great crime : let the amount of apparent proof against him be never so overwhelming, none will deny that it is the child's duty, come what will, to disbelieve his guilt if he can ; to give him the benefit not only of reasonable doubt, but of any the faintest and remotest possibility of inno- cence ; and to act accordingly, disregarding all personal consequences. Now this is but one out of a thousand instances, wherein the moral sense is mercifully empowered to correct the errors of the intellect, or supply its imperfections. Few in comparison are judges of evidence, but all may listen to the inward voice, directing them in such matters to the safer side. XV111 PREFACE. Let us now, very briefly, apply these principles to the case before us. And by way of proving their strength more entirely, we will grant for the present far more than the truth demands. We will suppose, on the one side, a great array of facts, authorities, and arguments, which a person does not know how to refute, (though he cannot say but it is very possible some refutation may exist, as yet unknown to him, or that counter- statements equally strong might be made :) and on the other side, only the simple principle, " quieta non movere : wherever a man is called, there let him abide with God :" even this alone ought assuredly to go a good way. Mere contentment and resignation to the Divine will, which has cast our lot where it is, in spiritual and intellectual no less than in temporal respects, ought in all reason to make us slow to change. " I am where God has seen fit to place me ; surely this one consideration entitles me to throw the burden of proof entirely on those who call on me to alter my profession." " Be content with such things as ye have :" be minute therefore and scrupulous in examining, (if your duty really call on you to examine,) whatever is said to separate you from your present Communion : look at it with a jealous, unfavourable eye, and shew to the other side pro- portional favour. For whatever else is right or wrong, this you are quite sure must be right ; " in whatsoever state you are, therewith to be content," PREFACE. XIX until you discern unequivocal manifestations of God's will calling you out of it. Again ; some questions are felt to be of a kind, which it requires a certain daring and hardihood of mind to answer in an intellectual way : and no doubt there are persons, who, when such a subject occurs to them, feel it as a kind of challenge to do their best in grappling with it. They acknowledge it as a call of Providence, a venture which they are summoned to make ; but intellects of the average sort instinctively draw back ; and are they not right in so doing ? Doubtless, the extent and complication of an argument, the number and magnitude of the points involved in it, the quantity of information which may be accumulated on it ; these are so many indications of its not being meant to be decided by common persons. They call on us for a wise self-distrust ; and self-distrust is a temper so suitable to us and our condition, that whatever course implies most of it has so far a presumption in its favour. Again ; the same remark applies, still more strongly, to the temper of mind which is turned by grace into contrition ; the inclination to magnify rather than extenuate our faults. If, on com- parison of two modes of thinking and acting, one is decidedly more favourable than the other to the cultivation of this great spiritual talent ; this is, so far, a declaration of Providence in favour of one rather than the other. c2 XX PREFACE, Further ; God's approving mark has been very emphatically set upon those who go as it were out of themselves to meet and welcome goodness in others. True though it be, that no man uninspired is an adequate judge of his neighbour's holiness ; and much as we may fear, that in some late instances too much has been said of visible sanctity as a sufficient test of truth ; yet we may be sure, it is not for nothing that God has made it simply impossible for us to refrain altogether from com- parisons and judgments of that sort. And besides, (to mention no more Scripture sayings,) none shall " rest upon God's holy hill," who " maketh" not " much of them that fear the Lord ." To have safe repose in the true Church, we must encourage in ourselves a great love and zeal for the holiness which He gives us to see and know in our brethren. Thus we seem to be supplied with a fourth moral test, to help in ascertaining our duty when we are called on to change our faith. We may ask ourselves, which is the more respectful way, the freer from unworthy suspicions, in regard of those, who to all outward appearance are doing their best to serve God. Observe, I do not say that we are directed, or qualified, to take either that side where the holiest persons may be found, or that wherein the average standard of practical goodness is the highest. I have just said that such comparisons were probably Psalm xv. 4. PREFACE. XXI never intended to be made by us. But it is one thing to weigh and measure other men's sanctity, another to love sanctity, and cling to it, wherever God puts it in our way : to love it the more the nearer He has brought it to ourselves, and to shrink from all that tends to disparage it. I will add yet one more, and that a most unquestionable element of right decision in all practical matters; the probability of scandal of causing our brethren to sin. No personal interest, surely, of his own, not even the most immediate peril of his own soul, can exempt a Christian man from the necessity of attending to the effect of his behaviour on others. If the Redeemer Himself rose up from His prayer and His Agony to wait on the spiritual need of His disciples, it is plainly impossible for a Christian man, in any conjuncture, to be innocently regardless of giving scandal. When the course to be pursued is most evident, this consideration must come in to regulate the manner of proceeding : clearly, then, in question- able cases, it must be an important ingredient in determining the course itself. On the whole, we have enumerated jive points, in which the moral sense may come in to de- termine " the safest way," whether in aid or in default of historical or abstract reasoning, or in some cases even against it. We may ask ourselves, which of two decisions is more in unison, first, with contentment ; secondly, with intellectual XX11 PREFACE. modesty ; thirdly, with contrition ; fourthly, with love of sanctity in others ; fifthly, with fear of giving offence. It is not of course meant, that there may not be instances, in which the will of God is so plainly revealed, by direct communication from Himself, or by overwhelming external evidence, as to supersede this kind of consideration altogether. But where the revelation, or the evidence, admits of question, there, I say that we are thrown back more* or less on moral tests, such as have been suggested ; that each one of them according to its measure deserves to be gravely thought on, as in the sight of God ; that where they concur in any great number, the providential warning becomes awful, more than in proportion to their number, the danger of slighting them is not only increased but multiplied ; and that the unequivocal presence of them all is such an indication which way our duty lies, as can only be overborne by manifesta- tions almost miraculous. Here it will of course be said, that it is easy for a zealous advocate to select points of this kind, no cause whatever being entirely without them, and so to make out any case at his pleasure. But really the matter is too serious to be disposed of by any such general remark. Let those who are inclined so to deal with it, ask themselves as in the Presence of Almighty God, whether these and other like considerations have not indeed been chosen out PREFACE. XX111 for their trial, not by any human pleader, but by His Providence, so that they cannot be neglected, or scornfully over-ruled, without profane disregard of Him. Certainly there do exist such points of detail in every grave question of conduct : and the enabling good and pure minds to discern and appreciate them seems to be the very process, whereby the Guide and Comforter of souls fulfils His Promise, " The meek shall He guide in judg- ment." This may be the kind of argument which our Divine Master intended, when He said, ' Ye shall know them by their fruits.' The most natural paraphrase of that saying seems to be, " The legi- timate results of the doctrine on life and behaviour, where they can be ascertained, are a sufficient test of its truth : and you, if you try to serve God in earnest, will find help to avail yourselves of this test." For instance, since " God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness ;" if it were once shewn that a certain set of opinions the Manichsean suppose, or the old Anabaptist, tended towards positive impurity ; this alone would shew that there was in them, viewed as opinions, some- thing opposed to the fundamental truth of Religion inconsistent with the idea of a Moral Governor of the world. That would be a plain and palpable case, and would strike on pure minds with a force like mathematical demonstration. In other in- stances, such as we are now concerned with, we can but follow the more probable course ; secure XXIV PREFACE. of guidance, if we follow it with a sincere and simple heart. To this extent, the promises are sure and universal : " Ye shall know them by their fruits ;" and, " If in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you." Moral Tests then are indispensable : only let them be fairly and religiously applied. I have mentioned a certain number, which obviously, I think, claim to be regarded in any proposed change of religion. The next step in our reasoning would be to shew, that in the question, e Whether an English Churchman is bound to submit himself to the Church of Rome/ all these considerations tell very distinctly on the English side. The next, to inquire whether the evidence for Rome is of that overpowering force, which might justify a man in disregarding all such impressions. Afterwards, with a view to the same question, we might compare the case between Rome and England with other cases, which some might deem parallel to it. Upon all which would follow certain conclusions, as to the line which Divine Providence seems to have marked out for us English Catholics, and as to some of the probable results, would all agree to walk by that line. Now then, remembering all along that we are not drawing out, but simply indicating, our argu- ment, let us proceed to the application of our PREFACE. XXV moral tests. As to the first, the promotion of contentedness, it may sound like a mere truism to say, that it is best answered by that theory, which would cause each man to remain where he is. But different virtues are tried by different situations ; and the position of an English Churchman of the Anglo-Catholic school, courted by the various claims and agencies of Rome, seems in many respects peculiarly fitted to form and prove this part of the Christian character : much more so than the converse position, that of a Roman Catholic beginning to suspect that there may be a reality in the English Church. This statement does but assume what opponents in general would be eager to grant : viz. that to a romantic imaginative mind at least, the Roman claims stand out in a very obvious manner, and the English deficiencies are quite confessed and palpable. " Yours," they will tell us, " undeniably is the poor, the homely, the unattractive side of the alternative. Who would wish, if he could choose, to be a member of a smaller and comparatively disunited body, instead of the largest and most compact of Christian communities ; to be doubtful where others feel certain ? Who would not have God's Saints, and their miracles, disclosed to Him, rather than regard them as so many unrevealed mysteries ? Who w r ould not possess rather than want an entire and definite system of doctrine, and a poetical ritual, extending through all parts of XXVI PREFACE. life ? Who, if he could help it, would acknowledge such as the Tudor monarchs and their favourites, as framers in any sense of the religious system he lives under ?" In these and many more instances, which Roman Catholics are never tired of alleging, let it be granted that we stand, prima fade, in a position, more or less humiliating : I say, that to acquiesce in it, because it is providentially our own position, to be dutiful and loyal amid the full consciousness of it, savours of the same kind of generous contentment, as the not being ashamed of lowly parentage, nor unloving towards a dull monotonous home. Next, as to intellectual modesty : if in any case it is an appalling task to exercise private judgment on sacred things, this surely is such a case : whether one considers the habits of thought in which a person should be trained and prepared for the inquiry, or the variety and extent of in- formation required, or the infinite moment of the conclusions on either side, and the startling nature of some of them ; or finally, the weight and number of conflicting authorities. Well may the judge in such a cause cry out with the Prophet of old, (t How can I alone bear the cumbrance and the burthen and the strife ?" For see, first, what is involved in the conclusion, when a person trained in Greece or in England gives in his name to the Church of Rome. It is deciding on his own authority what are the limits PREFACE. XXV11 of the Kingdom of Christ, what the evangelical terms of salvation. He is pronouncing not only on the truth, but on the importance also, of the many and various propositions, which being in debate among those who call themselves Catholics, are settled under anathema by the Roman councils. He is consigning millions, who had no other thought than to live and die true subjects of the visible Catholic Church, to the comparatively for- lorn hope of incurable ignorance and uncovenanted mercy. He is doing all this, I say, on his own authority : for although he may declare that he does but accept the Church's word for each doc- trine, this will not make him the less responsible for taking on himself to determine, what is the Church, whose word he will accept. If a child go out of his way to choose a physician for himself, is he not accountable for each separate direction, otherwise than he would have been, had he trusted his parents to choose for him ? Imagine how a person would feel, were he challenged solemnly to sign, on Ms own private judgment, such a document as the Creed of St. Athanasius, or the Nicene Creed with its Anathema, and to venture his salvation upon it. In the infinitely varying contingencies of human duty, of the pastoral care, especially, such a step might possibly be needed, but who would not ask overwhelming proof of its necessity? Who would not shrink from it as an act of extreme XXV111 PREFACE. daring ? And yet people can bring themselves to think and speak lightly of adhering to the Tridentine Creed on their own private judgment : a far bolder step, by how much the doctrines enforced are farther removed from the foundations of Chris- tianity, the evidence of their universal and original reception less obvious, and the number greater of those whom they exclude from Christ's pale. Further ; supposing such a thing called for, one would rather expect the call to be something single, loud, and irresistible : such as might justify a private citizen in taking on himself to pull down half a city, in extremity of fire or siege. But the call here is the sum and result of at least two long and intricate discussions : the one abstract, on the nature and proper force of theological development ; the other historical, whether the truths taught from the beginning have been duly developed in the Roman Church alone : discussions demanding great ingenuity and learning, and faculties trained or gifted for the most subtle and patient inquiry. And as if on purpose to bring home to the con- science still more the boldness of the proceeding, Providence has caused to be gathered on both sides a host of great and holy names, the mere enumeration of which, one would think, might and must put down every thought of making one's self " a judge and divider over them." Thirdly : whereas special circumspection is re- quired in dealing with any rule or statement, which PREFACE. XXIX may possibly lessen penitential shame for sins passed : we may well dread the Roman claims, so far as they withhold sacramental grace" from our Church, were it only that they suggest such a ready plea to a conscience bent on extenuating its own sinfulness. To deny or doubt a man's baptism, is to help him to assuage his self-reproaching thoughts, with the notion that after all he has not grieved nor vexed the Holy Spirit : that his state has hitherto been that of a heathen ; and his ill conduct comparatively excusable. It is a miserable fear, and a miserable consciousness which in part prompts it, yet unquestionably there is ground to fear, lest some of us be some day tempted to renounce our privileges, in the secret hope of lightening our account, or our penance. If the Enemy can once persuade us that our Baptism was but a shadow ; that hitherto, being servants of sin, we were free from righteousness, less expected of us in the way of obedience, and our faults more or less venial, what will become of our contrition ? It is the same snare in another form, which is found so attractive in the popular Lutheran per- version of the doctrine of Justification by Faith. The bare possibility of such a thing is plainly one call more for hesitation, in admitting a statement which involves that peril. Again ; the change of which I am speaking seems to put men in some especial danger of disparaging the fruits of the Holy Ghost, and of that which XXX PREFACE. the Apostle d calls "rejoicing in iniquity;" ex- ulting over what evil they can find in their brethren. At least, so it would appear from recent experience. Nothing seems to have so long retarded those who have just now been passing away from us, as the apprehension they had of real sanctity in the Body which they were leaving. And no wonder : since by the act of leaving, they were also denouncing it as no part of the Body of Christ. Well might they pause on such a step, which, if wrongly hazarded, would not only prove an outrage on natural piety and affection, and an ungrateful rejection of the methods by which Divine Mercy had fed them all their life long unto this day, but would bring with it besides something profane and sacrilegious, akin to denying the grace of God in His Sacraments : making out that to be human and ordinary, which was the especial and immediate work of the Holy Ghost. I suppose there is no one of us, who thinks of such matters at all, but has known from his child- hood, by experience or history or both, some one or more on whom he has depended, as the models of Christian goodness providentially thrown in his way, and specially appointed for himself to work by. Think of bringing one's self to regard those very persons as no more than very good heathens, and their works as no portion nor fruit of the Un- A I Cor. xiii. 6. cf. Aristotle, Eth. Nicom. ii. vii. 15. on PREFACE. XXXI speakable Gift ! It seems almost like being forced to part altogether with our faith in sacramental grace, or in the inspiration of the Holy Scriptures. Besides the profaneness, a glory would be departed, such as never could be replaced. More especially in this case, where the change would be simply negative a loss without any compensation. It is not that we are introduced to a fresh type of holiness, an order of Saints which before we knew not of; but whereas hitherto we were happy in believing that we were interested in all the Saints of the whole Church, we are now required to cast off all but the Roman. Not so in the opposite case. A Roman Catholic joining the English Communion has no occasion to conceive himself separated from the undeniable sanctity of the Church of Rome. There is nothing to prevent our acknowledging their Saints : there is much to make them slow and jealous in recognising any true holiness beyond their own border. And it is a great additional unhappiness, surely, for those who, with or without their own fault, are haunted with misgivings about the reality of our Church, that they are continually tempted to something like " rejoicing in iniquity :" to grudging and dis- paraging thoughts of that, which after all may prove to have been the grace of God in their brethren. Sad exemplifications might be given of this, were it a subject which would bear dwelling upon. But I rather pass on to the fifth and last-men- XXX11 PREFACE. tioned of the moral warnings, (so to call them,) which seem mysteriously to stand in men's way, as the Angel in Balaam's, when they would withdraw themselves from our Church : I mean, the amount of offence and scandal, quite inseparable from such a movement. Most considerate persons know something of the grief and perplexity, if but one doubting thought flash across them in their devotions. Judge what it must be to have to answer, though it be for a single soul, haunted for whole years with the like waverings of imagination, every time it addresses itself to prayer. But the pain and anxiety is the least part of the mischief. What shall we say, if some hasty step of ours, unsettling the principles of some weak brother, leave him either a sceptic for life, or drive him back, by a kind of reaction, into the cold uncatholic ways, the region where each man does what is right in his own eyes ? What if we confirm the prejudices of the unbelieving world, and put a clue into her hand, whereby to entangle anew those who were just beginning to disengage them- selves from her ? What if we aid in setting an evil mark on primitive truths and counsels of perfec- tion ; provoking persecution, discouraging novices, breaking the bruised reed, and quenching the smoking flax ? One would not wish to write on such a subject from a mere overflow of feeling ; one would rather be guilty of under than of over- PREFACE. XXXlli statement. But none of these perilous conse- quences are denied by those who would most wish to deny them. And being such as they are, and coming in addition to all that has been before enumerated, they surely do throw the burthen of proof with unusual force upon the side to which they adhere. Is that side capable of sustaining the burthen ? This is the third and most momentous step in our inquiry ; not to be entered on but in fear and trembling, and under an urgent sense of duty : but so guarded, we may have good hope that it will not take us from the safe way. Here, however, the direct and obvious course is, by supposition, out of our power ; I mean, the detailed examination of the controversy, balancing the arguments on each point. This, I say, our hypothesis excludes, as a task requiring extraordinary endowments ; our endeavour all along being to provide for average cases. Ways, however, of tolerable satisfaction are open, if men will be content with such certainty as the matter allows, and not require absolute instead of practical demonstration. Thus, we might survey some one branch of the subject ; the more comprehensive the better, provided it were manageable ; and judge of the whole by the result in that instance. Take the Supremacy, or Purgatory, or the worship of the Blessed Virgin and the Saints ; remembering all d XXXIV PREFACE. along that the question is not simply of the truth of what is taught, and the dutifulness of what is done, but of its necessity as a condition of Church communion. Is the evidence in either case of that overwhelming amount, which leaves no material scruple in a fair mind ? and ought it to be less, if it is to sweep away all the moral difficulties just now enumerated ? Is it not mainly made up of subtle inferences, philosophical, historical, or gram- matical, from premisses more or less ambiguous and obscure ? so that we long to close the discus- sion, instinctively certain, that this cannot be the sort of process, intended to counteract so many of our best feelings. Or we might take the broad undeniable facts of the dispensation, as stated by the Roman Catholic writers themselves, and see how they correspond with the known dealings of Providence, in cases alleged as analogous. For example : one of the principal difficulties which haunt thoughtful Anglicans in the present state of things, is the contrast between what they really find, and what they seem encouraged, in Scripture and Antiquity, to expect. The Church should be one ; but to us the present Church seems palpably and incurably divided. The Church should be a guide ; but by us the present Church is hardly felt to be such in several important points. And persons are tempted hastily to conclude, either that the promises have failed, or that we are not in the Church. PREFACE. XXXV And certainly I would not deny, that both the Prophecies of the Old Testament, and those of our Lord Himself in His farewell discourse with His Disciples, and also the general tone of Church writers and aspect of Church affairs in the first and best times, would lead to the expectation of some- thing very different from what we now see ; some- thing more like what the Roman Church claims for herself. I say, more like what she claims; for it would be begging the question to affirm the justice of her claim, or to maintain that even at first sight a primitive Christian would not be startled at the aspect of the Latin as of other sections of the Church. On first impressions, we might well anticipate that he would find some- thing new and astonishing in the Supremacy, in the adoration of the Virgin, in image worship, and in the doctrine of Purgatory, as each of those tenets is now popularly developed. But I waive that portion of the argument, and suppose for the present that the general face of things at Rome has more of the air and outward habiliments of the system described in the Bible, than can be found elsewhere ; and thereupon I ask, Is it safe, in interpreting Prophecy, to be guided mainly by such anticipations, how natural soever ? I think, that the analogy of God's dealings with men in former times would lead us to expect a less obvious fulfilment, to be recognised rather by a trusting, resolute faith, than by a searching, d2 XXXVI PREPACK. comprehensive, historical intellect. For instance, Canaan seemed to be promised to the Patriarchs themselves* : there was something, to human sense, disappointing, in its not being won till after many generations. How completely did the predictions to the house of David appear to man's judgment as if they failed b ! how eminently is it the work of faith to see that they are realized in our Lord! And to take the greatest instance of all, what a disappointment was that of the whole Jewish nation, the lowly Apostles alike and the haughty Priests, when they were told the true meaning of the Old Testament in its sayings concerning Christ's kingdom ! a disappointment in which even now both Jews and many Christians (so far perhaps Judaizing) seem almost entirely to sympathize. Is it not possible that the Roman Catholic exposition of the same Scriptures may partake of the same error ? It surely seems to depend very much upon certain outward circumstances, which however striking to the imagination, are rather particular forms and embodiments of the great idea of Unity, than inseparable parts of the idea itself. I allude to such details as the correspondence of Jerusalem with Rome, of the succession of the Popes with that of the kings of Judah, of pilgrimages and appeals with the resort of God's people to His city. It were much to be wished, that those who Gen. xiii. 15 17; Acts vii. 5. b Ps. Ixxxix. 49. PREFACE. XXX Vll are attracted by these and other like obvious external points of unity in the Roman Catholic Church, would soberly endeavour to analyse their own impressions. They would find, perhaps, that they are influenced in a far greater degree than they imagine by considerations such as I have now specified, political rather than theological or devotional; after which if they go, doing violence to their moral instinct, what is it but taking Christ by force, and making Him an earthly King? I will hazard another and a very obvious remark, on the general state of the whole con- troversy ; namely, that the Roman view, to be fully convincing, ought to apply to the other notes of the Church as well as to its Unity and Visibility, No doubt, in respect of those two marks, the theory in question answers more literally to the Prophe- cies, than does the Anglican, which I suppose to be also the Greek theory. The Papal Monarchy unquestionably exhibits to the eye an Unity of government more entire than can be found in the rest of Christendom. But how is it when we come to the note of Sanctity ? Is not Rome obliged to demand on the whole the same allowances as the other parts of Christendom are, when such texts as the following are to be considered ? " All thy children shall be taught of the Lord, and great shall be the peace of thy children." " Thy people also shall be all righteous." " Violence shall no XXXV111 PREFACE. more be heard in thy land, wasting nor destruction within thy borders ." Again, in respect of Universality ; wide and large as her Communion is, it does not as yet by a great deal come up literally to the prophetic promises ; such as, " The earth shall be filled with the know- ledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea." Such words as those cannot of course be pleaded for her, just as they stand. A certain approximation to their meaning is all that she can allege : enough and to spare for faith in her as a real Church, but hardly enough to satisfy a sober- minded person, whose duties have hitherto lain elsewhere, that she alone is the real Church. Now, if Roman Christians may fairly claim this kind of allowance, in their explanation of those texts, which make Sanctity and Universality notes inseparable of the true Church ; why may not similar allowance be granted to English or Greek Christians, concerning the note of Unity also ? What law of Providence is there, what declaration of holy writ, what clear tradition of antiquity, to warrant our expecting that the Church shall be always visibly One, in another and more exact sense than that in which she shall be visibly Holy ? If the one attribute may be obscured and doubtful, in a greater or less degree, for a longer or a shorter time, why not the other also ? " See also Ps. Ixxii. 7; Isaiah xi. 6 9; xxxii. 1 6, 15 18; xxxv. 8, 9 ; Ixv. 25. Ezek. xxxv. 25. &c. PREFACE. XXXIX But it is feared that in this way men lose the promises of guidance and instruction, such as, "My Spirit and My words shall not depart out of thy mouth :" and, " He will guide you into all truth d ." And it is surmised, that without perfect visible unity of government, we might listen in vain after an authoritative voice, to secure well-meaning souls from ruinous error. But first, it is surely a material consideration, which has constantly been urged in this contro- versy, and has never, that I know of, met with a satisfactory answer, How far the promises to the Church, like those to individuals, are conditional : her more external privileges dependent on her inward and spiritual privilege of sanctity. In the next place, defect of guidance in essentials is no necessary consequence of simple disunion in the Church. A different result is at least con- ceivable. It is conceivable, that before the time of disunion, events had been so providentially ordered, that all truths and practices generally necessary to salvation were sufficiently established in the rule of the whole Church, and that, in all such matters, the several portions continued to agree. Such agreement, being notorious and un- questionable, might be ascertained by any, even d This latter promise, by the way, seems at least as inconsistent with the notion of imperfect developement of fundamentals in Apostolical times, as with that of possible error touching truths of a secondary order in after times. Xl PREFACE. the simplest Christian ; by a process similar to that, whereby a Roman Catholic (for example) ascertains the voice of his own Church. Now a very large proportion indeed of any Churchman's faith, be he Greek, Roman, or English, is made up of these common elements : much larger than any of us, perhaps, would imagine, until he had considered the thing in detail : and I say again, It is surely conceivable, that in it may be providentially contained all things necessary to salvation : and if so, then the promises about guid- ance are really fulfilled to the divided Church ; and that, in the same unexpected, and as one may say, indirect manner, which seems generally to have characterized the fulfilment of the ancient pro- phecies. It may illustrate what is meant, if I put a case, which some Roman Catholics themselves, perhaps, will feel to be not undeserving of attention. For considerable portions of time, sometimes for two generations together, the Mediaeval Western Church has been divided. There have been Anti-Popes rival pretenders to that throne, which in its dis- tinct visibility claims to be the sole sufficient guarantee of the continuance of Christ's kingdom on Earth. How was a plain Christian to know which of the claimants he should adhere to ? What became of those, many or few, who with no fault of their own adhered to the wrong claimant ? Where, during all that time, was the infallible PREFACE. Xli unquestionable guidance ? What was the duty of persons finding themselves providentially in com- munion with one of the claimants, and coming to know that there was a doubt, but conscious that they were unable to balance the authorities, and solve that doubt for themselves ? It seems as if the answers to these questions, mutatis mutandis, might help us not a little in coming to a right practical sense of our own posi- tion and duty. Suppose a Roman Catholic should say that all necessary truths and rules having been settled before such schism commenced, a simple believer adhering to them was safe, even though he might be, innocently on his part, out of com- munion with the true successor of St. Peter : I suppose he might also add, that God's watchful Providence protected both sections of the Church against disagreement in fundamentals, during the period of their estrangement; so that although externally divided, they were in His sight One, and the means of grace and salvation might be had in both. If thus much be granted, (I know not whether it would be, but if it were,) how is not our principle conceded? For surely the mere length of time is not essential in this case. It is just as con- ceivable that nine as that two generations of believers might live and die in such comparative disadvantage. The one no more implies failure in the Church, or a breach of the promises, than the Xlii PREFACE. other. By whatever process the word of Scripture was fulfilled, to any faithful man " willing to do God's will/' and desiring so to " know of the doc- trine," in a time when the chair of St. Peter was disputed, by the same or a similar process it may be fulfilled to us. It was of course impossible, then, for ordinary persons to decide between those claimants ; for how could they ascertain the facts of an election, or settle the disputed points of ecclesiastical law ? They could but abide in the Communion where- unto God's Providence had called them, desiring and hoping to be in the Catholic Church. And is not this just an account of the duty of the same sort of persons under the present sad division of Christendom ? The disputed points are waiting for a general Council to settle them. That final and supreme authority of the Church is for a time, providentially, in abeyance. We go on appealing to it, and in the mean time submitting our judg- ment to that portion of the apparent visible Church, wherewith, by God's appointment, we are in Communion. The more I consider the promises of Holy Writ, directed as they are more especially to the meek and humble and trembling of heart, the more hope do I seem to feel that they may be addressed to persons in our condition, at least as consistently with their letter and spirit, as when they are taken in that more outward and palpable sense, which PREFACE. Xlili Roman Catholics attribute to them. And if there is but a fair probability that such may be the case, then on Bishop Butler's principle, rather I will say, on the principle which our Great Father has ordained to guide His children in practical mat- ters, it must be better for each person, and in the end, doubtless, more conducive to the unity of the Church, for English Catholics to "abide in the calling wherein they are called ;" overcoming, for faith and charity's sake, the temptation to seek elsewhere more certainty, and a more satisfactory systematical kind of knowledge : whereof the one seems rather too like " requiring a sign," the other, like "seeking after wisdom," in that spirit which the Apostle reproved. Again : according to Roman Catholic state- ments, an analogy might be supposed between our case, and that of an Israelite of old invited to Christianity. What then was the sort and amount of testimony, which it pleased God to vouchsafe to those whom He called to so great a change ? By allowance of all but infidels, no Jew could be more certain of the divine origin of the system in which he was trained, than we are of those portions of Christianity which we hold in common with the Roman Church. We seem to ourselves to have, at least, as complete evidence of our relation to Christ, as the Jews had of their interest in the God of their Fathers. Our circumstances (if it may be reverently said) require more abundant proof than Xliv PREFACE. theirs : inasmuch as we are called on to renounce and disavow a great deal, they only to build on what they had before. But what is the fact ? While to them was given every mark of supernatural interference, we are left to such comparisons as our own and others' ingenuity and learning can supply. With them it was submission to a voice from Heaven : with us it must be either reasonings and feelings of our own, or acquiescence in those of a guide whom we choose for ourselves. If we were sure that we might reason at all from their case to ours, the obvious inference would be, that God willed us rather to refrain from that, which when He would have done, He signified His purpose so irresistibly. The comparative want of evidence would strengthen the impression which the moral difficulties had left. Another broad and obvious way of considering the question would be, to compare the acknow- ledged difficulties of the Roman and English theories, and observe which are in fact most analogous to those, wherewith the general truths of all religion are beset. The Anglican theory of Church Unity may perhaps be stated, sufficiently for our present purpose, as follows : That our Lord left His Apostles to be collectively the centre of union to His Church, so that Communion with them in Faith and Sacraments should be for ever the PREFACE. visible pledge of Church membership : That this Communion is secured by the gift of the Aposto- lical Succession, and of those truths and ordi- nances,, of which it is notorious, that they were acknowledged as primitive and essential by the undivided Church : That the being of our Lord's Kingdom being thus secured, the collective autho- rity of the Apostles' Successors is requisite, and is sufficient, to make for its well-being laws of universal obligation : But that this authority, for the sins and divisions of Christendom, having been for many centuries under suspension, and visible unity inter- rupted, we can but go on, as was said before, each one in obedience to the portion of the Church in which his own lot has been cast, under appeal to the governing body in respect of any debated points : And so we are preserved, though not in visible, yet as we may hope in real mystical union. Of the gravest and most obvious objection to this view, I mean, its seeming inconsistency with the Prophecies, something has been already said. In addition, we may consider that the scriptural images, by which the unity of the Church is familiarly set forth, are such as rather to suggest than exclude this idea. All, whether Churches or individuals, must be branches of the same Tree ; but a tree may have suckers ; there may be an unseen, underground unity. We must be all streams from the same Fountain, but part of our course may have been out of sight. We must Xlvi PREFACE. be all sheep of the same flock, but the flock may have been more or less scattered. We must be all members of the same Body, but the healthful circulation may be more or less obstructed. We must be all subjects of the same kingdom, but there may be a disputed succession. Adverting in particular to this last analogy ; does not the constitution of the Jewish people cause us to think of a federal government, rather than of a monarchy, as likely to be realized in its antitype ? Throughout the far greater part of its existence, such was undoubtedly the form of its unity : the Council of Elders bore sway : the longing for a king was deprecated as a degenerate feeling : and although at times, in default of kingly power, every man did that which was right in his own eyes, we are no where told that the commonwealth of Israel had therefore ceased to exist. For aught that appears at first sight, the notion of each Bishop's independency, sometimes called Cyprianic, may be as legitimate a development of the original Apostolical idea, as the notion of the whole Episcopate, or Apostolate, providentially gathered into a single see. The danger in the one case, of indefinite disunion, is not a priori greater than the danger in the other, of con- tinued exaggeration and corruption. If you say, there is supernatural security in the promise through St. Peter, applying it to the Roman see ; why may we not as well apply that promise, as PREFACE. xlvil St. Cyprian seems to have done, to the whole Episcopate ? And if this be called an unreal, un- practical view, inasmuch as the Papacy has been acting in great power for many ages, while the government by co-ordinate Bishops has existed (they say) but in theory : such a statement takes for granted one of the main points in question : that when appeals became necessary, they were always, as of right, made to Rome : whereas at first view it certainly would appear that for many hundred years unity and truth were preserved under the other, or federal constitution. Neither would the loyal and affectionate sense of union be at all impaired by such an arrange- ment ; if one may judge at least by analogy from terrestrial commonwealths. Where shall we find a country where national sympathies take up more of men's hearts than in Germany ? Yet in Germany for many years there has been no unity of govern- ment ; but language and race have proved more powerful to bind than political institutions to sepa- rate. Why should it be thought incredible among us, that Divine grace may work a like brotherly feeling in the separated portions of the Church ? Since in God's ear they speak all the same language, and they all belong to the same holy family, their mutual estrangements need not have annulled all the privileges of their new birth. Our Scripture difficulties being thus disposed of, those which arise from natural anticipation, pre- xlviii PREFACE. vious to Scripture, ar plainly referable to the same class as those for which solutions are pro- vided in the second part of the Analogy. It may be well to make this evident by taking some of Butler's own statements, only with the substitution of the special terms of the present argument for his general ones. For example 6 : "Since, upon experience, the [general course of Church history] is found to be greatly different from what, before experience, would have been expected ; and such as, men fancy, there lie great objections against : this ren- ders it beforehand highly credible, that we may find the [course providentially recommended in a particular emergency of that history], very different from expectations formed beforehand ; and liable, in appearance, to great objections." The whole of the well-known passage concerning Inspiration plainly holds good in favour of a probable Tradition, as against a special sensible guidance on the one hand, and Papal Infallibility on the other f . "We are wholly ignorant .... how far, or in what way, God would interpose, to secure [Church Principles] being transmitted to posterity. We are equally ignorant, whether the evidence of them would be certain, or highly probable, or doubtful : or whether all who should have any degree of instruction from them, and any degree of evidence of their truth, would have the same. . . . p. 236. Ed. 1791. f p. 238. PREFACE. Nay, we are not in any sort able to judge, whether it were to have been expected that the [mind of the Church] should have been committed to writing ; or left to be handed down, and consequently cor- rupted, by verbal tradition, and at length sunk under it, if people so pleased, and during such time as they are permitted, in the degree they evidently are, to act as they will." How does this way of speaking suit with the sentiment, that an Infallible Guide must needs be given, because we cannot see how the truth can be otherwise preserved ? or with that other sentiment, " I walk by my own private judgment, but I know I cannot be far wrong, because I have prayed ?" Again g , " The only question [for an English Churchman] concerning the [Church of England] is, whether it be a real [branch of the Church] ; not, whether it be attended with every circum- stance which we should have looked for : and concerning the [Prayer Book,] whether it be what it claims to be ; not, whether it be a book of such sort, and so promulged, as we might be apt to fancy a [perfect form of solemn worship] should." I cannot help thinking that dissatisfied and critical spirits would find much rest, and be saved much temptation, if they would resolve simply to go on in the spirit of these obvious cautions, when they are examining questions relating to their own Church, even as, no doubt, they are used e ]). 240. e I PREFACE. to do in dealing with objections against the Gospel itself. Again h , " The [English theory] represents the Church as [partly] in a state of [decay,] and [offers our system, especially the Prayer Book, as a help against further decay.] Is it credible," the objector asks, " that so many [centuries] should have been let pass, before a matter of such sort, of so great and so general importance, was made known to [Christendom ;] and then that it should be known to so small a portion thereof? Is it conceivable that this [help] should be so very de- ficient, should have so much obscurity and doubt- fulness ?" [being pleaded with equal confidence by two contradictory schools :] " should be liable to as gross perversions," [by State interference, by admission of heretics to Communion, and the like,] " in short," (let it be so stated for the argument's sake,) " lie open to as serious objections," [al- though, it may be, on the opposite side,] " as the [unreformed system] itself?" Thus far the objector : now hear the Bishop's reply. " Without determining how far this in fact is so, I answer ; it is by no means incredible that it might be so, if [the course of nature and the provi- dential career of the Church] be under the same Hand. . . . Remedies existing in nature for diseases, have been unknown to mankind for many ages : are known but to few now : probably many valuable h p, 249. PREFACE. li ones are not known yet. Great has been and is the obscurity and difficulty, in the nature and ap- plication of them. Circumstances seem often to make them very improper, where they are absolutely necessary. It is after long labour and study, and many unsuccessful endeavours, that they are brought to be as useful as they are ; after high contempt and absolute rejection of the most useful we have ; and after disputes and doubts which have seemed to be endless. The best remedies too, when un- skilfully, much more if dishonestly, applied, may produce new diseases ; and with the rightest appli- cation, the success of them is often doubtful. In many cases, they are not at all effectual : where they are, it is often very slowly ; and the applica- tion of them, and the necessary regimen accompa- nying it, is, not uncommonly, so disagreeable, that some will not submit to them ; and satisfy them- selves with the excuse, that if they would, it is not certain whether it would be successful. And many persons, who labour under diseases, for which there are known natural remedies, are not so happy as to be always, if ever, in the way of them. In a word, the remedies which nature has provided for diseases are neither certain, perfect, nor universal. And indeed the same principles of arguing, which would lead us to conclude that they must be so, would lead us likewise to conclude, that there could be no occasion for them ; that is, that there could be no diseases at all." e2 Hi PREFACE. Will not all this apply to the supposed failure of the English Reformation, when alleged as a reason for renouncing the present English Church ? Again, the sixth chapter of the same part of the treatise, dealing with the objections supposed to arise from the want of universality in revelation, and from the supposed deficiency in the proof of it, seems even to apply itself, as we read, to our own imputed defects of catholicity and infallibility. " The weakness of these opinions may be shewn, by observing the suppositions on which they are founded : which are really such as these ; that it cannot be thought God would have bestowed any favour at all upon us, unless in the degree which, we think, He might, and which, we imagine, would be most to our particular advantage : and also that it cannot be thought He would bestow a favour upon any, unless He bestowed the same upon all : suppositions which we find contradicted, not by a few instances in God's natural government of the world, but by the general analogy of nature to- gether 1 ." Passages of like application might be indefinitely multiplied : I wish those were less appropriate, which speak of a certain scornfulness, but too natural to eager and unguarded minds, fresh from deciding on hard questions : and not least dis- cernible, perhaps, in those who have been led to take the Roman side in this present contro- 1 p. 297. PREFACE. versy. But these citations may be enough to shew, that the analogies from nature, and from former revelation, do not tell so unquestionably against our position, as to dispense with the need of direct evidence, abundant and overpowering, to make it untenable. One might conceive such a preponderance of authorities, among those who might be supposed capable of deciding on that evidence, as in all reason ought to satisfy those, who know themselves to be incapable. But neither does our case supply this. Good and wise men for aught that appears, equally good and wise men k , are found equally earnest and persevering on the one side as on the other. There is no appearance, as though in pro- portion to their sanctity, either English or Roman Catholics felt ordinarily any tendency to give up their hereditary views. Three centuries have now passed, and converts having authority are yet very few. A fact which tells more strongly, perhaps, on the English side than on the Roman, inasmuch as we know that the great instructors of our Church had the claims of Rome distinctly before them, k If any one is moved by the present want of regular cano- nization in trie English Church : first, this no more evinces a comparative defect of real holiness, than the omission of individual names (Kempis, for example) from the Roman Calendar, dis- proves their inward sanctity in the sight of God; secondly, ad- herence to the Tridentine Creed involves condemnation of the Greek Church also, which has all along claimed and exercised the right of canonizing. v PREFACE. but with Roman Saints and Doctors, for many reasons, the Anglican view had far less chance to be considered. It came on them, generally, from a greater distance : for so it is, that few of them, if any, were our countrymen, or resident among us. To master our theory, therefore, was very seldom their special duty : it was natural for them to slight it altogether, as a dreamy, unreal kind of thing. On the whole, authorities being as they are ; analogies, whether of Scripture or Experience, readily coming into view, whereby the objections to our case may be met ; and the details of the controversy not being manageable without more than usual subtlety and learning : ordinary in- quirers seem fairly thrown back on the moral difficulties before alleged : and what can the result be, but patient continuance in our providential calling ? But it will be said, " You are proving too much. All, or nearly all this, tells as strongly for Roman Catholics, as for English Catholics, remaining in their present Communion." And supposing this granted, for argument's sake as it is not, to us, an immediate practical topic the objector might go on : " Each one then is to abide in the reli- gious condition in which he finds himself. At this rate, how are heretics, or even unbelievers, to be converted ? what chance remains of healing the PREFACE. v Church's divisions ? what becomes of all the great sayings, such as Magna est veritas, et prcevalebit ? are we not sacrificing truth to peace, divine doc- trines to hereditary yearnings and impressions ?" Here then we come on the fourth head of our discussion : we have to shew, that what has been said is not transferable to the cases mentioned in the objection : that being granted, it still leaves us a solid and complete ground of dogmatical teaching : and that the hope of Church Union (humanly speaking) would not be diminished, but rather enlarged, by the general acceptance of our principles. The matter may perhaps be simplified by re- ferring to a passage in St. John's Gospel, which contains a sort of classification of all religions. " He was in the world, and the world was made by Him, and the world knew Him not. He came unto His own, and His own received Him not. But as many as received Him, to them gave He the privilege of becoming sons of God." The first of these three verses seems to represent the con- dition of Heathens and Unbelievers ; the second of Jews, Mahometans, and Heretics ; the third of Christians properly so called, i. e. Catholics. Now as to the first, those who know not their Maker, the principle of " the safe way" is at once applicable to them, because in conversion they give up nothing, and have a chance of gaining eternity. Ivi PREFACE. With respect to those to whom Christ has come, but they have not yet received Him : the mass of testimony given in the first place to the Jews, and now made present to all Christians by the constant tradition of the Church warranting the Scriptures, is prima facie sufficient to overbalance such moral difficulties as may beset them. For in their case is no discontent nor ingra- titude ; they are not called on to give up any thing, but only to add to what they have : the Jew, who has always looked to Christ, to believe that He is already come; the Mahometan and Unitarian, to believe in His Divine Nature ; the Rationalist, in our supernatural communion with Him. They are not, like English Churchmen, invited to disavow what they have all along accounted a real and living participation in God the Word made Man for them. Again ; in neither of those cases are men invited, as we are, to trust their own a priori reasoning. All is testimony, overpowering testimony ; first, that such and such miracles were wrought, such and such sufferings undergone ; next, that this is the morality, this the doctrinal and sacramental system, in behalf of which it was all done and suffered. The sense of undivided Christendom on all these great points is so notorious, that to ac- quiesce therein is not reliance on, but submission of, our own understandings. As to the deep sense of sins past : one who has PREFACE. never yet believed himself a living member of Christ, cannot well experience the same fear and shame as he who has been all along taught what God has done for him. Conversion therefore from any form of rationalism to the Church need not bring with it any such check to contrition, as would naturally be occasioned by disavowal of our part in the Church. You go, for example, to a Baptist, and urge him to conform. He cannot say that he is tempted to do so, in part, by the hope of ridding himself of bitter remembrances of post-baptismal sin. For it was never any tenet of his, that post-baptismal sin has any special aggravation. But had he thought himself before in such sense a member of Christ, that his unchristian doings had on them that peculiar mark of evil, which Catholics recognise, then he might feel a sort of relief, in being told that his membership had hitherto been but ima- ginary. The same kind of remark might be made as to the degree in which he was separating himself from good persons in his former communion, and dis- paraging their goodness. How has he been used to judge of that goodness in times past ? He has counted it, most truly of course, a special token from God's sanctifying Spirit, vouchsafed (as he thinks) upon the act of our believing in Christ as our Saviour. He has not counted it, as supposing himself Catholic he would have done, a regular Iviii PREFACE. fruit of the Free Unspeakable Gift, vouchsafed in Baptism on our being made members of Christ : the work not so much of the believer himself, as of Christ abiding in him. In that case, he must have been content to lower his estimate of it. But now nothing hinders, but that he may still think of it as he did ; as of a token of mercy overflowing, an extraordinary favour, over and above the settled dispensation of Grace. Much in the same way as (it has been observed) the Rationalist ought not to think himself wronged by our denying the reality of his sacraments, since we allow him still as much as he claims himself, edification, comfort, order, and the like : so it is in this case. In joining the Church from any Protestant body, a man does not give up the claim of sacramental and supernatural holiness on the part of the communion which he leaves. For why ? such claim was never at all alleged. In joining the Roman Church from the English or the Greek, he plainly does deny and disavow the same. This is a great and a startling difference. Lastly, as to giving offence, no doubt there is risk of it in every change of received opinions and conduct; risk of perplexing the simple, encouraging the presumptuous, and promoting a general scepti- cism. But the danger is mitigated, as the conviction assailed is less. To give up opinions is not like sacrificing principles. Private theories and inter- pretations are not so shocking to part with, as PREFACE. lix Church Formularies. Individuals are disturbed by the one, by the other whole nations and races. And what is more especially to be remarked, the very atmosphere of those bodies which do not profess and call themselves Catholic, is pervaded, avowedly so, by the elements of change. So that a movement towards something fixed, though it be a movement, tends on the whole to stability. As the moral objections to change are less, so the positive prima facie reasons for it are far more overpowering, when we deal with Dissenters, than when Roman Catholics are dealing with us. The very axiom which we begin with, " Universal consent among Christians is moral demonstration," is denied by Dissenters : they must deny it, in order to hold their own at all. But being once received, it tells so unquestionably for a visible Church, for sacramental grace, for government by succession from the Apostles, and perhaps for some other kindred points ; that it may well seem intended to overrule far greater moral difficulties than any which stand in its way. One case, that which perhaps is most frequently alleged against us the case of the Donatists is at once disposed of by the very obvious reflection, so often adduced, and not least forcibly of late, that the Unity of the Church is by no means visible to us, in the same sense that it was to the contemporaries of St. Augustine. It is matter of reason or of faith, not of sight, in the countries Ix PREFACE. where only, for the most part, appeal to it is needed. Ask for the Church in England, and we know which way people will point. In Greek countries, the Roman Church will be popularly described, I suppose, as the Latin Church. These two facts go a good way against the application of St. Augustine's argument, to the ordinary use of the word Catholic among Protestants. Indeed, in the present unhappy state of Christen- dom, one can scarce imagine a person changing his Communion merely for the sake of the old visible unity, without more or less of haunting scruple and distrust of his own choice : and where will he be then ? He will still, as before, run the risk of having to fall back on the excuse of invin- cible ignorance for involuntary schism : but the position will now be one of his own choosing, and who can say how much difference that may make in it to the All-seeing Eye ? It would be another matter, if our faith in the Church of England caused us to anathematize other Churches, or to declare them in any sense aliens. Such a spirit, universal among us, would indeed be a sad token of something too like the old Novatianism or Donatism : God grant it may never prevail ! But if it should, besides silencing our old divines, the Prayer Book must be made another book than it is : for at present it implies throughout, and asserts in its Preface to the Ordi- nation Services, that we hold of antiquity through PREFACE. Ixi the mediaeval times : and therefore that Romans and Greeks, abiding as they were in those times, are still Catholics, and we in true communion with them ; though the visible use of that communion (which God restore !) be in His just judgment sus- pended for a while. Roman Catholic controversialists are fond of comparing this view with that of the more moderate Donatists, and of inferring that we are liable to St. Augustine's censures on them. They do not consider, (among other differences,) what a large portion of the " orbis terrarum," for many many generations past, we should have to anathe- matize on our own private judgment : whereas Donatism in St. Augustine's time was scarce a hundred years old, and reached but to a handful of men in a single province. And I suppose it would be true to say, that whenever Roman Catholics will prove the supremacy of the Pope with any thing like the same mass of authority and argument, as that by which St. Augustine proved the necessary imperfection of the visible Church, we will at once submit ourselves to him. Until then, the cases cannot be parallel. This suggests the further remark, that our debates with the Roman Catholics turn more on matters of fact and detail, than on principles. For example : we are no more minded than they, to set up the private judgment of an individual or a province, against that of the Church universal. Ixii PREFACE. Only we require to be satisfied, before we affirm that the present Roman obedience is the whole Church. Our minds are as open, we hope, as theirs, to the fearful mystery of post-baptismal sin : but we dare not take on ourselves to pronounce it neces- sary to salvation, that a person should receive the precise statements of the Roman Schools concern- ing Purgatory. We receive as a principle every statement of Scripture and of the early undivided Church, on the Presence of our Lord in the Holy Eucharist : we hesitate in limiting those statements, on peril of men's souls, to that one only manner of presence which is called Transubstantiation. We venerate the Blessed Virgin as most truly the Mother of God : and we know of no honour vouch- safed to any creature, at all comparable to that which she received at our Lord's Incarnation. Neither do we take on ourselves to limit the prerogatives, which the King of Saints may have assigned to those whom He delights to honour. But we dare not of our own authority decide that our Church has forfeited her being as a Church, by her censure passed on the particular system of mediation and tutelage which the Roman Church has counte- nanced '. 1 This example is not inserted without some painful hesitation. For if indeed the Church of Rome had authoritatively sanctioned the view, lately, alas ! understood to have been put forth in her PREFACE. And so of other things : we feel all along that we have not set out from the beginning in opposite directions,, nor do our courses tend continually to wider separation. It is no such violent imagination, to fancy ourselves re-united as of old, without any sacrifice of principle on either side. I say, of principle : because undoubtedly certain statements of fact, and applications of principle, would have to be waived or withdrawn. Now, what is the result of such a feeling as this, on a modest and thoughtful mind ? Plainly to render a man more easily contented with his place ; more willing to hope and wait with patience, as having a right to reckon certainly upon a great behalf: the substance of which view appears to be, That some one among creatures must be preeminent above the rest ; that this can be no other than the Mother of God ; and therefore that as long as we account her less than God, we cannot possibly idolize her in a bad sense : if this were part of the recognised Roman Creed, then by adhering to that Creed we should not only be ac- knowledging new facts, but also adopting new principles : and, so far, the argument in the text would not apply. Only in proportion to the strange and startling nature of those principles, and the right which they assume in us, a priori, of judging what must or must not take place in the world out of sight, it is plain that we should naturally look for very distinct and unanswerable proof. Amounting as they really would to an additional dispensation, over and above those of Christmas, Easter, and Pentecost, we might without presumption hope for the same kind of evidence, as was vouchsafed when the Gospel and the Church were revealed. But the comfort is, these antecedent grounds of the worship in question are not yet put forth by authority ; and most devoutly is it to be wished, that they never may be so: for they would set all our relations on a new footing, more hopeless, humanly speaking, than ever. PREFACE. deal of unconscious sympathy, and virtual com- munion in Divine offices, on the part of those even who esteem themselves most alienated from him. But suppose the same person once made aware, that in order to stay where he is, he must con- tradict something which has been held as an axiom by the mass of believers from time immemorial ; some rule, so to call it, of the common law of the Christian kingdom ; this is surely another case altogether. The providential call on such an one to consider where he is, and why, becomes much more direct ; and the possible sacrifice, if as great or greater, yet more evidently worth making. Consider next, how this bears on the obvious position of the several communities of Christians, apart from Rome, from Greece, and from England. The Donatists and Novatians of old, (to say nothing of grosser heresies,) avowedly denied the commis- sion of the Church from the beginning, to remit or retain all sins. The Eastern Separatists, whether Nestorians or Jacobites, must feel that if they are right, the great visible Body of Christ has in all times been either undecided or wrong, on no less a point than the reality of our Lord's Incarnation. Again, (to omit for the present all other points,) the Lutheran and Reformed Continental Schools are themselves not slow to acknowledge, that their doctrine of Justification, though traceable, as they say, through considerable portions of Church history, has never been dominant, never universally enforced. These PREFACE. 1XV surely are startling admissions : and whoever finds them irresistibly urged upon him, has a reason for suspecting what he has hitherto trusted in, a reason other in kind than he would have had, were the tenets in dispute of the order before exemplified. Neither does this reasoning lose its validity because of our shameful and lamentable disunion, and the free course of false doctrine within our walls, owing to the Church's want of means to enforce the Catholic sense of her formularies: unless it can be shewn, that bearing with an error is the same thing as enacting it, and lays the com- munity chargeable with it under the same dis- advantage : a canon which, according to Roman statements, would unchurch the three first cen- turies of Christendom, since we are told that during that whole time the very Godhead of Jesus Christ, or at least the doctrine of the most Holy Trinity, remained an undeveloped mystery ; that views which virtually impugn it were left un- censured, and their promoters honoured as or- thodox and holy men. If it was so indeed, and yet the Church of the Fathers continued without all question a true Church, why may not the Church of England continue a true Church also, notwithstanding her toleration of Puritans and other Rationalists within her borders ? Upon the whole, painful as many things are, the course marked out in the present distress, for a f PREFACE. sincere humble-minded Catholic in the Church of England, seems in no wise doubtful or obscure. Suppose him assailed by scruples from without or from within : let him not dare to indulge them in the least, until he has counted the whole cost, how much heavier the burthen of changing, than of persisting in his providential station ; whom and what he is called to separate himself from ; what sort of persons he will grieve, what offences en- courage ; in how many ways, which he can even now perceive, his spiritual dangers will be aggra- vated : besides the certainty that every such ven- ture must be fraught with unforeseen evil of its own. Then let him survey, as any person of average good sense and information may easily do, the kind and amount of evidence brought to dis- turb him : let him compare it with what Providence has vouchsafed in cases said to be analogous. Finally, let him fairly ask himself, " Is the result at all like moral demonstration ? and ought I, in this case, to be contented with less ?" I am persuaded that the moral difficulties, which have now been touched upon, would be generally felt by good minds as quite irresistible, but for that longing after assurance perfect rest of mind and heart which might perhaps not unaptly be called the " last infirmity" of saintly spirits. As the tender and anxious conscience is won by the expectation of some peculiar, untried repose, to be found in Roman Catholic confessionals only ; forgetting that PREFACE. Ixvii the same treasure of pardon is by God's mercy already within its reach : so the restless argumen- tative intellect thinks to take refuge in the doctrine of infallibility; not considering, that by a like effort we might as well, if so disposed, silence our scruples in continuing where God has placed us. But why should imperfect beings, such as we are, depend on assurance of either kind ? since even on Roman Catholic principles it is not to be expected on that very point, which concerns us more nearly than either, namely, our own final perseverance? A very few years' thoughtful ex- perience will tell us, that a reasonable hope is in general far better than absolute certainty of good, for such beings as most of us are : more in unison with all around us: more conducive to steady improvement: more apt to form in us that re- signed, humble character, that " mind of little children," to which all the promises are made. Scripture again, describing Faith not as full satis- faction of the intellect, but as Trpay^arcdv eXey^ov ov /3Ae7rofieVo)i> " making a venture on things unseen" would seem to encourage a generous trust in that which it is our duty to love; and to discourage, as more or less selfish, all restless cravings for a more certain and systematic know- ledge. A man cannot innocently overlook the risk of forsaking his appointed place, of condemning and unsettling others, for insufficient reasons : and personal assurance is clearly an insufficient reason ; f2 Ixviii PREFACE. as selfish, in its way, as domestic comfort, partial affection, or the wish to quiet importunity. At best, it is " doing evil that good may come :" and the assurance so gained, there is reason to fear, will prove more or less delusive. Neither are providential hints wanting, especially calculated to keep us in our place at this time. The stir and movement for the better within our own walls, as if God had some especial work in store for us, has not quite passed away, as might have been feared. On the other hand, we have been made to see that even were we to submit ourselves to the Roman Church, we should not at once free ourselves of course from uncertainty. Looking at her system in an argumentative way, we should have to choose between the modern theory of Developement, and the more established theory of silent unrecorded Tradition. And again, in so practical a matter as our regular devotions, a doubting thought would be brought almost hourly before us, whether or no the Blessed Virgin Mary is the one Mediatrix of Prayer, in such sense, that to seek her intercession is as truly our duty, as to lean on the merits of her Son. Again, to say nothing of other countries, what a fact is the present state of Ireland, in regard especially of the sixth Commandment, if we view it side by side with the many statements, whereby it is sought to propagate the notion of the surer and better working of the Roman system ! PREFACE. Surely, taking all into account, it is more scrip- tural, more analogous to God's ordinary moral government, aye, and more hopeful too, in the end, to suppose the whole visible Body shattered and decayed, than to claim perfection for one part, while we deny the very being of the rest. It is true that this line of argument would lead Greek or Roman Catholics, as well as English, to shrink from all thoughts of separation" 1 ; and that it would materially affect our own ways of speaking and judging of them and of their systems. It would take us continually back to the very foundation of our English theory : that those from whom we are separated are yet in the Church, since we inherit, as it were, through them. If so, they are nearer to us, every one of them, than any human relation can make them. We have a special duty of brotherly love towards them, over and above the general tribute, due to all men, of lenient and charitable judgment. If called on by sufficient authority to concur 'in words which sound harsh towards them, the nature of the case binds us to take those words in the lowest sense which honest interpretation will allow, m It is not, of course, meant that no combination of circum- stances would justify a Roman Catholic, being such by inheritance, much more a penitent after hasty conversion, in conforming to the English Church ; but only that it is in any case a very awful and momentous proceeding: so far, however, less painful and responsible than the act of an Anglican conforming to Rome, as it involves less of an Anathema on the Communion separated from. 1XX PREFACE. and to make the most of all remaining sympathies and agreements, except where some special reason is shewn to the contrary. If such consideration be due (as all will allow) to those yet in com- munion with us (alas, how many!) who deny and disavow the Catholic meaning of our formu- laries : it is due no less to those, whose Creed is substantially the same with our own, though we may not worship together. This is all self-evident, when men once under- stand the resemblance of our case to that of a divided family, divided for a time by some error of their superiors : relationship continuing, while intercourse is interrupted. And perhaps it applies not the less forcibly, when we recollect the special circumstances of the misunderstanding which origi- nally parted us. Natural piety, too, would recom- mend the most guarded and respectful thoughts and words, seeing that the matters in controversy between us touch continually on the verge of most sacred and unquestionable truths, on which if a man discourse ignorantly, he can hardly fail to symbolize with heretics, and to disparage Saints and Fathers. With these feelings, we need not, I trust, fear, lest in clinging dutifully to our own Church of England we lose our hold on the First and only True Church. While we forego some things, in themselves desirable, for charity's and obedience' sake, there remains yet a great body enough, PREFACE. if rightly improved,, to fill out a whole life of Catholic opinions, usages, and sympathies, wherein we may indulge without a shadow of offence. Here lies our true Via Pacis, and centre of unity : not to be found by eagerly pressing on to outward commu- nion, but rather by praying for them and with them at a distance : by acquiescing, so long as it shall please God, in the sentence (so to call it) of partial excommunication, which seems now for many centuries to have hung over each separate portion of our sinful and decayed Christendom. This, in God's counsels, may be the kind of unity intended for us, as best suiting our condition, and furthering our probation : an unity of faith, not of sight : an unity which, far from admitting any boastful con- templation of our privileges, cannot be imagined apart from the constant breathings of a lowly and penitent spirit. May one be permitted (though most unworthy) to offer one concluding suggestion, which will surely be taken in good part by all kind readers of whatever section of the Church ? It is this : That at one time or another in our daily devotions, we should offer up our Lord's Prayer, as a prayer, in special, for Church union ; if so be He may gra- ciously accept it, remembering His own Eucharis- tical petition, " THAT THEY MAY BE ONE, AS WE ARE." Our Father, which art in Heaven, One God the Father Almighty, One Lord Jesus Christ, One Ixxii PREFACE. Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son ; have mercy upon us Thy children, and make us all one in Thee. Hallowed be Thy Name: Thou Who art One Lord, and Thy Name One ; have mercy upon us all, who are called by Thy Name, and make us more and more one in Thee. Thy kingdom come: O King of Righteousness and Peace, gather us more and more into Thy kingdom, and make us both visibly and invisibly one in Thee. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in Heaven: Thou Who hast declared unto us the mystery of Thy will, to gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in Heaven and which are on earth : conform us, O Lord, to that holy will of Thine, and make us all one in Thee. Give us this day our daily Bread : Thou in Whom we being many are one Bread and one Body : grant that we being all partakers of that one Bread, may day by day be more and more one in Thee. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us : Thou, Who didst say, Father, forgive them, for those who were rending Thy Blessed Body : forgive us the many things we have done to mar the unity of Thy mystical Body, and make us, forgiving and loving one another, to be more and more one in Thee. PREFACE. Ixxiii And lead us not into temptation : As Thou didst enable Thine Apostles to continue with Thee in Thy temptations : so enable us by Thy grace to abide with Thee in Thy true Church under all trials, visible and invisible, nor ever to cease from being one in Thee. But deliver us from evil : From the enemy and false accuser : from envy and grudging : from an unquiet and discontented spirit : from heresy and schism : from strife and debate : from a scornful temper, and reliance on our own understanding : from offence given or taken ; and from whatever might disturb Thy Church, and cause it to be less one in Thee : Good Lord, deliver and preserve Thy servants for ever. Hursley, Oct. 21, 1847. CONTENTS. SERMON I. Page 1. FAVOUR SHEWN TO IMPLICIT FAITH. Psalm cxix. 99, 100. I have more understanding than all my teachers ; for Thy testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the ancients ; because I keep Thy precepts. SERMON II. Page 24. IMPLICIT FAITH RECOGNISED BY REASON. Psalm cxix. 99, 100. I have more understanding than all my teachers; for Thy testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the ancients ; hecause I keep Thy precepts. SERMON III. Page 43. IMPLICIT FAITH RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 1 Thessalonians v. 20, 21. Despise not prophesy ings : prove all things ; hold fast that which is good. SERMON IV. Page 76. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. St. Matt, xxiv. 12. . . . iniquity shall abound. Ixxvi CONTENTS. SERMON V. Page 105. DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. Rom. i. 32. Who, knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. SERMON VI. Page 127. NATIONAL APOSTASY. 1 Samuel xii. 23. As for me, God forbid that I should sin against the LORD in ceasing to pray for you : but I will teach you the good and the right way. SERMON VII. Page 149. CHURCH AND STATE. Isiah xlix. 23. And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers. SERMON VIII. Page 173. PRIMITIVE TRADITION RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 2 Tim. i. 14. That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Holy Ghost which dwell eth in us. SERMON IX. Page 232. CHURCH SOCIETIES. Numbers xxiii. 23. According to this time it shall be said of Jacob and of Israel, What hath God wrought? CONTENTS. SERMON X. Page 251. EUCHARISTICAL OFFICES. St. Johnxvii. 19. For their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they also might be sanctified through the Truth. SERMON XI. Page 273. COUNSELS OF PERFECTION. St. Luke v. 11. When they had brought their ships to laud, they forsook all, and followed Him. SERMON XII. Page 293. ENDURANCE OF CHURCH IMPERFECTIONS. Jer. xlv. 4, 5. The LORD saith thus : Behold, that which I have built will I break down, and that which I have planted will I pluck up, even this whole land : and seekest thou great things for thyself? seek them not : for, behold, I will bring evil upon all flesh, saith the LORD ; but thy life will I give Unto thee for a prey in all places whither thou goest. SERMON XIII. Page 321. THE DUTY OF HOPING AGAINST HOPE. Rom. iv. 18. Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be. POSTSCRIPT TO SERMON VIII. Page 339. SERMONS, ACADEMICAL AND OCCASIONAL. SERMON L FAVOUR SHEWN TO IMPLICIT FAITH. PSALM cxix. 99, 100. / have more understanding than all my teachers ; for Thy testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the ancients ; because I keep Thy precepts. As experience widens and corrects our general views of human life, we are commonly not long in finding out, that the connection between success in any pursuit, and the talent of those employed in it, is by no means so invariable, as our first thoughts would lead us to anticipate. I am not now speaking only of our general liability to failure, how the best concerted schemes are from time to time unaccountably deranged: how after a time we " return, and see under the sun, that the race is not" always " to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill : but time and chance happeneth to them all." 1 This and the two following Sermons were preached before the University of Oxford in the years 1822, 1823. B 2 FAVOUR SHEWN TO IMPLICIT FAITH. No doubt, there is much in this, which can no -otherwise;' be; raccounted for, than by referring it .to the .cp.ntrol of. a gracious, yet mysterious, Pro- vldehce; whish will not suffer man to depend for success upon himself, or upon any thing on this side the grave. Nevertheless, there is also much, which may in a good degree be explained, without lessening our awful sense of that ever-present control, by reference to certain general laws, according to which the present system of things, so far as it is within our comprehension, appears to be regulated. One of these laws probably is, "That the common course of what affects human life should be more nearly adapted to the average* capacity and con- dition of mankind, than to cases which rise much above or fall much below it c ." For example, those kinds of sustenance, which the great majority of animal frames most constantly require, are most widely diffused, and most easily obtained. In strict b n/oTo>s yap fieirat HOVTJS, (TO Kqpvypa) ov cruAXo-ytfr/xcoi/' Sto 77 fjiaXio-ra avTo Oavpdfciv aiov' ov% on xpjyort/ioi/ Koi o~a>Tr)piov povov, aXX* OTl KCU CVKoKoV, KOL pa(TTOJ/, KOL Tolg TTaCTiV fvXrjTTTOV' O dr) /HaXiOTd TTJS rov Qeov Trpovoias epyov eVri, KOIVO. ra Trap cavrov TrporiOevros aTracriv' yap eVl ^Xi'ov, /cat (reX^i^j, KCU y^s Ka\ Qa\drT7]s> xal TCOJ/ aXXcov , ov rois pev rrXovrovai Kal o-o(po1s ir\fiovos /ueraSiSous rrjs OTTO xP r }y' ias ' eXarroi/os de rots Trei^o-tv, dXX' larrjv aTracri TTJV nporidfls, TOVTO Kal eVi rov Kypvyparos et/yyacraro- /cat TroXXw TrXeov, ocra) Kal avayKOiOTepov TOVTO eWvooi/. S. Chrys. in Rom. i. 13. t. 3. p. 15. c See the same kind of argument in Arist. Eth. i. 8. Jr) tf av KOi 7TO\VKOIVOV, K. T. X. FAVOUR SHEWN TO IMPLICIT FAITH. 3 accordance with this dispensation, we may observe, that, granting a certain degree of common sense, it is not great natural ability, so much as singleness of purpose, and perseverance in uniform and dis- creet labour, which determines, in the ordinary course of things, who shall succeed, and who fail, in their respective temporal objects. In commerce, a tendency to daring speculations, however skilful and well combined, cannot be so safely trusted as punctual and unswerving industry. In literature, though it were senseless to dispute the great advantage of superior ability, when united with persevering diligence ; it is equally notorious, that supposing the two separated, more fatal errors by far against truth and sound reasoning have resulted from genius without application, than from the contrary character : understanding by the word , not TO aXrjOes not " what is true in speculation," but " what is, in morality, fit and right." Of which all persons must, we know, be qualified to judge, because all are called on to practise it ; and on which, evidently, the sincerest and best, not the most ingenious, enquirer, is surest to decide aright. So that this passage, which appears at first to con- tradict the sufficiency of implicit Faith, turns out to be, in fact, the strongest recommendation of it. If it only directed enquiry in general, it might occasion some perplexity. But limiting the en- quiry as it does, to a point obviously within the reach of all honest men of ordinary capacities, it affords a clear warrant for the assent, which such are invariably found to yield to Catholic Truth, when fairly laid before them. Our Blessed Saviour Himself had taken care, in the very beginning of His ministry, to leave His Church full instructions on this point. " Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits*." The term -^ev^oTrpo^rjTai is here evidently analogical. In its primitive acceptation it denotes 1 St. Malt. vii. 15, 16. RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 59 not merely false teachers, but false pretenders to supernatural knowledge, such as false teachers in the Old Testament, and under the Jewish theo- cracy, must usually have been. For then, as the ordinary messengers of God were inspired, those who took on themselves the office must of course have affected inspiration also. But here, as is usual in the prophetic parts of the New Testa- ment, the term is applied to the corresponding class of persons, soon to arise in the Christian Church : i. e. to all propagators of false doctrine, whether claiming miraculous powers or no. Such, our Saviour tells us, are to be known by their fruits. Now He must mean, either their own bad conduct ; or the pernicious tendency, or pernicious effect, of the doctrine they taught. But He could not mean the bad conduct of the teachers themselves, because unhappily all experience shews us, that the soundest and most orthodox principles are but too consistent with the worst practices. And He said to Judas, as unreservedly as to any other of the Apostles, " He that receiveth you, receiveth Me j ." Bad conduct therefore in an orthodox teacher, how hateful and deplorable soever, cannot entitle him to the epithet \lsev8o7rp6(j)r)Tr]s : for it neither annuls his commis- sion, nor falsifies his doctrine. Nor, on the other hand, will good conduct, at least such as human j St. Matt. x. 40. 60 IMPLICIT FAITH eyes can discern, afford a sufficient argument that a man's faith is in the right : for this reason among others ; that the very sense of doubtfulness and paradox, singularity and novelty, a feeling often connected with lurking error, in many cases has a tendency to make people more circumspect. In others again, natural good impulses do much towards correcting the effects of monstrous and immoral doctrines, and rendering men happily inconsistent with themselves. It follows, that the term " fruits," in our Saviour's warning, means something different from the personal character of the Teacher. Indeed the analogy of itself would suggest as much. For since the question is concerning the soundness of doctrine, not the integrity of the man, it must be the fruits of the doctrine, not of the man, to which appeal would naturally be made. But here again a question arises, What are, properly speaking, the fruits of the doctrine ? Does our Saviour mean the actual effects which it has produced in the world, or its natural and legitimate tendency, if fairly acted upon ? Here also the perverseness and inconsistency of mankind will not leave us long to seek for an answer. It is but too manifest, that in all ages the best truths have been so abused, as to shelter and encourage the worst practices. If there be any one temper more hateful than another to Almighty- God, more fre- quently and awfully denounced, and surer to draw RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 61 down His heaviest curses upon the Church or the individual chargeable with it, that temper is Hypocrisy ; the knowledge of God without the love of Him. But the very notion of Hypocrisy, as the word is used in Scripture, implies, to a con- siderable degree, Orthodoxy. The Pharisees were the straitest k , i. e. the most orthodox, sect of the Jews in our Saviour's time. Never was the whole body of the nation so free from idolatry, so fondly attached to the law of Moses. Never, in the worst times of their idolatry, was God so deeply displeased with them. We must not dare then to judge of doctrines by their apparent actual effects, lest we be driven to the blasphemy of charging the Mosaic Law, the gift of God Himself, with all the guilt of the Pharisees. Nay more : our Lord and His Prophets are continually warning us, that the very Gospel itself, humanly speaking, will produce results which would compel us, on such a supposition, to reject it. " Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth ? I tell you, Nay, but rather division V And if we will believe the constant witness of the Pro- phets, we must make up our minds to see iniquity abounding, and the love of God dying away, at the very same time that the Gospel is preached most extensively ; and, as far as outward profession and speculative assent go, most successfully also m . k Acts xxvi. 5. cf. Phil. Hi. 5. l St. Luke xii. 51. m See particularly St. Matt. xxiv. 12 14. Dan. xii. 1, 4. 62 IMPLICIT FAITH Ultimately indeed, if ever we come to view the full effects of the Christian Revelation, private as well as public, on the heart as well as on the visible conduct, in the next world as well as in this ; doubtless we shall perceive, that in despite of bad Angels and bad men, it has done good, infinitely beyond comparison with the evils which now meet our view. This, however, is as yet matter of faith, not of sight. But if the test last proposed, viz. the visible effect, fail as applied to the Christian religion generally, it cannot be safely applied to any par- ticular doctrine or part of that religion. It follows, that when our Lord spoke of knowing false Prophets by their fruits, He meant neither their own lives, nor the lives of their followers, but the genuine tendencies of their teaching, sup- posing it fairly interpreted, and followed up in practice. I put out of the question here the great verities of the Christian faith, recognised by consent of all Churches, and registered in their Creeds. For these are like the first truths of natural religion ; implicitly to be received at all risks ; not to be judged of, but to be made a measure for judging of others. Of these we are to make no controversy : but concerning all minor points, I understand our Lord's maxim to be, If a doc- trinal view, or an interpretation of Scripture, on the best consideration you can give it, tend really to deepen faith in those great foundation articles, RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 63 and otherwise to promote holiness and humility, to disengage you from the world, to " make sin more exceeding sinful," then act as if it were true, and you are safe. If it contradict that which was from the beginning; if it lower the standard of morality, or encourage men to take liberties ; if it engender spiritual pride, and a conceit of God's especial favour ; be sure it is not of God : it will not stand the proof: it must be let go, if you will hold fast that which is good. It may perhaps be objected, that the character- istic here proposed as the test of disputed doctrine is itself as finely marked, and as difficult to ascertain, as any of the truths that are to be tried by its means. To judge of the true tendency of a doc- trine requires, it may be said, no common degree of natural acuteness, aided by large stores of expe- rience. For every ordinary hearer to be encouraged to attempt it, may seem like trusting one unskilled in chemistry with the most delicate processes of the laboratory. Nothing but fallacy, or at best only random truth, can be reasonably expected from such an allowance. Any one who should argue in this manner would need to be reminded of this great difference (amongst others) between practical questions in morality and religion, and all investigations merely technical : that the experience, which guides us to the truth in arts and trades, is of course confined 64 IMPLICIT PAITH to the few who practise them ; but the experience, which teaches us the way to be happy, is constantly growing in every man, whatever be his faculties or opportunities. Rich and poor, learned and ignorant, are completely on a level in that respect. In the next place, we must take into our account the great quickness and subtlety, which men of the most ordinary parts frequently attain to, in regard of some one favourite subject. By con- tinually bending all their faculties and exertions that one way, they come in time to a surprising readiness in connecting all other things with it, and discerning the remotest bearings which they can by possibility have upon it. Just as some savage tribes, not otherwise remarkable for quick- ness of perception, are reported to distinguish the beasts of chace, which form their chief support, at an almost incredible distance, and where a less prac- tised eye would never be able to detect them. It is not surely past belief, that any one among Christians, however deficient in human learning or argumentative skill, might be able, through a siimlar attention to the great end of life, to see his way safely, if not clearly or comfortably, through all the mazes of error and disputation. In one respect, such a person would even have the advantage of those, who, with no greater natural endowments, were placed more within reach of instruction. He would be less perplexed with RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 65 those varieties of evidence on the different sides of a question, which multiply the chances of apparent inconsistency, and render it more difficult to strike the balance between conflicting opinions. His single enquiry would be, Does this doctrine, or does it not, tend to confirm me in the love of God and my neighbour ; in doing as I would be done by ; in renouncing the world, and denying myself? And it cannot be thought, that having his mind constantly bent on such things, he would ever be much perplexed about the answer, or materially misled by it. One thing which makes the generality of reasoners afraid to trust themselves or others in this mode of enquiry, is their habit of confounding the actual effects of any doctrine with its genuine natural tendencies. To most men it is a far pleasanter task, to watch the apparent result of an opinion or system of belief upon other people's conduct, than to sit down and consider fairly, what effect, in all reason, their believing it ought to have upon them- selves. Accordingly, whenever mention is made of judging of a doctrine by its tendency, such as are not in the habit of thinking very accurately, take you to mean its real result, as visible in the lives of its maintainers. A criterion of which considerate men are with the best reason exceedingly jealous : it having been, at all times, the prevailing artifice of error and heresy, especially error of the fana- tical cast, to appeal to the good conduct of their 66 IMPLICIT FAITH followers, and to the wickedness or carelessness of orthodox believers. On the other hand, to judge properly of the tendencies of a doctrine, merely from the doctrine itself, without knowing its history, implies that one is used to consider one's own opinions and principles, in good earnest, as matter of practice. In this mainly seems to have consisted that guilelessness, which received such an approving welcome from our Blessed Lord in the case of Nathanael : the exact contrary to the hypocrisy of the Pharisees. But being, it is to be feared, a very uncommon fairness of mind; we cannot easily bring ourselves tp give other people credit for it ; or to allow it, where it does exist, that authority in controversies of faith, to which it is reasonably entitled. But the strongest scruples must give way to experiment. By way therefore of completing our view of this matter, let us now institute what may be called an experiment upon it, by just turning our thoughts, of course very briefly, towards three or four of the most important points, which are debated among persons professing and calling themselves Christians. Divesting ourselves, for a moment, of all impressions received from other kinds of evidence, let us endeavour to consider these points with an eye to nothing but their practical tendency. It will be seen, I think, not only that the most primitive view of them, in each RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 67 case, is also the most favourable to good morals and unaffected piety : but likewise, that this tend- ency is so direct and obvious, that it could not pass unobserved by any one, who should conduct his enquiries in that honest, practical way, which we have been now supposing. To help us in this examination, it will be con- venient to distinguish the various forms of error in regard of doctrine against all of which, as we believe, the text offers a sure and simple remedy into four classes, corresponding to the four Com- mandments of the First Table of the Decalogue. Of course, we understand those Commandments spiritually, and interpret them by the aid of the New Testament. On this plan of exposition, the meaning of the first Commandment, with its preface, will stand as follows. As the Israelites were forbidden to have any God, except Jehovah, Who brought them out of the land of Egypt, so Christians must not seek for happiness in any but Him, to Whom they stand indebted for redemption from eternal death, and sanctification to eternal life. This first Command- ment, then, is a warning not only against open infidelity, but also against that more subtle apostasy, which would substitute another notion of God for the Jehovah of the Bible, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, the holy Trinity in the adorable Unity. The second, in like manner, may be considered F 2 68 IMPLICIT FAITH as an authoritative condemnation of those errors* which substitute any other Mediator, any other way of coming to God and happiness, in the place of our only Teacher and Saviour, Christ Jesus. Again ; since swearing by the name of any being is used in Holy Scripture to denote acknowledging his Godhead ; taking God's Name in vain may be understood, in a wider sense than it generally is, as comprehending all nominal, hypocritical con- formity to the true religion. And lastly ; since the Jewish sabbath was con- fessedly meant as a type of that better rest, which remained for the people of God ; that is, of the condition of baptized Christians; it is reasonable to regard the fourth Commandment as a caution to all such, that they remember their own privileges remember how blessed their condition is, and keep it holy accordingly : not waiting for any further conversion or regeneration not excusing defects in moral goodness by any supposed want of grace, nor in any way going back to the slavery and imperfection of the Law, or of their natural state. Under these four heads, of apostasy, false mediators, nominal Christianity, and depreciation of Gospel privileges, may be classed, if I mistake not, all heresies and material errors in regard of the doctrinal part of religion. If therefore it can be shewn, that the rule of trying doctrines by their tendencies would sufficiently protect us against RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 69 either of these, we need not fear to act on it ourselves, or to recommend it to others, as a safe universal rule. With regard to the first class of errors, it will be sufficient to repeat the answer usually and justly made to those, who look upon the Catholic doctrine of the Trinity as a mere speculative position. He who believes the Almighty God to have become incarnate, and to have died to do away with the cause of sin, must in reason feel a deeper horror of sin and its consequences, than could be excited by the voluntary death of any prophet or martyr, or even angel. And He who knows the Eternal Spirit of God to be personally close to him, as an ever-present Friend, to watch every thought, word, and action, prompting to all good, and checking all evil knows a truth, which ought surely to impress him with the peculiar, mysterious interest which God takes in his doings, more strongly even than the belief in His omni- presence : the moral tendency of which no partizan of mere natural religion can deny. To this may be added, that the doctrine of the Incarnation opens a way for all our best human affections to interest themselves more immediately on behalf of religion. We are sure now that we may understand the Bible quite literally, when it speaks of God's sympathizing with us : Christ Himself having declared His willingness to feel towards us as towards brethren and sisters and 70 IMPLICIT FAITH mothers : and consequently inviting and encou- raging us to cultivate the corresponding affec- tions towards Him. Whatever, therefore, is taken away from the Catholic doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation; is so much taken away from the love and fear of God : the necessary foundation of all sound morality. Next, with regard to those errors, which affect our faith in one only Mediator : and which, as I suppose, bear the same relation to the second Commandment, that Apostasy and Socinianism do to the first. Whatever withdraws our minds from the Cross of Christ, to fix them on any thing else as the meritorious cause of our pardon and salvation ; or from participation of Christ, as the one efficient cause, whereby His merits are made available to us ; whether it be a personal agent, a saint or angel, or a mere phantom of our own supposed merit, to which we are invited to look : either way, the favour and forgiveness of God is made infinitely a cheaper thing,. and the offence of sin in the same degree extenuated. We are no longer led distinctly to refer all our hopes of happiness to the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, applied to ourselves : consequently, we are not so incessantly called upon to imitate that sacrifice in our lives to be made (as the Apostle words it) " conformable to His death 11 ," by suffering and self-denial. Where the Atonement is denied, or explained away, this n Philipp. iii. 10. RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 71 evil tendency is of course most palpable. But no doubt it is also to be discerned in those cases, (if any such there be,) where the reconciling efficacy of our Saviour's blood is acknowledged entire, and only His office as Intercessor intruded upon. In either case, there is, as it were, " a graven image" set up : an unscriptural, unauthorized medium of communication between God and man is resorted to: an imperfect standard is placed before us, instead of the divine and unblemished Jesus: and (what is of chief moment in morality, and mainly distinguishes the true religion from Heathenism) there is no longer an unity in our religious thoughts and feelings ; our faith, hope, and charity, are not undivided: how then can our practice be alto- gether steady and consistent ? Proceeding to the third class of errors, above specified, and designated by the phrase " nominal Christianity," or taking God's Name falsely upon one's self, I need not surely point out, how im- possible it is for any thing of this kind to stand the trial proposed by St. Paul. Of all heresies, Anti- nomianism is the last, which could ever recommend itself to the conscience of any plain honest believer, as a doctrine fit to be held fast because of its moral goodness. Although it bid fair to become, in one shape or another, the most prevailing error of any, yet it will least of any bear to be argued upon : the case concerning it, both from Scripture and Reason, being so very plain. 72 IMPLICIT FAITH I will not therefore now dwell on it, but will just explain, in the fourth and last place, how our rule, of judging doctrines by their tendency, may be exactly applied to the detection of such errors, as were typified, in Jewish times, by neglect of the Sabbath such as lead men to depreciate the privileges of the visible Church. Let us, for example, suppose a considerate un- biassed man, acting steadily by this rule, to have the following statement, for the first time, presented to his mind : that although the offers of grace by the Gospel are addressed to all Christians, they are to be understood with limitation to those only, who are especial objects of His favour who con- stituting a certain number, foreseen and decreed by the Almighty, shall be saved, as it were in spite of themselves, out of an evil world : while to the rest, for all the declarations of the Church, and the language of Scripture, no mercy was ever intended, no grace ever given. Lay this before a sincere, sober-minded person, who never heard of it before, and see if he will not answer, This must be wrong, for it takes away the use of good works. Let the same person be asked again, Whether strong feelings, returns of prayer, or any thing approaching to sensible impulses of God's Holy Spirit, are necessary, or always desirable, as signs of a state of grace. Will not his reply be, " All these things are mere matter of comfort : to expect them, RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 73 is to expect our reward in this world : at any rate, they take off a man's attention from the calm and steady performance of his duties : and therefore it must be best to think as little as possible of them, one way or the other?" Many more instances might be given. But these may suffice by way of specimen, and will readily enable any one, who thinks the argument worth pursuing, to supply more for himself. Only I am tempted, at the risk of going too much into detail, to produce one additional example of the utility of the proposed test : viz. that it furnishes, practically, a short but satisfactory way of settling the controversy concerning the Christian Ministry. That which is good, KOL\OV, conformable to one's natural feelings of propriety, veneration, and af- fection, in such a matter, is surely for men to take too little upon themselves, rather than too much. If there are any, who seem to have Christ's transmitted warrant for the ministerial prerogatives they exercise, while another class is so circumstanced, that the most they can say is, " We mean well, and have good hope that we are not intruding upon the priest's office ;" common sense bids us " hold fast" by the communion of the former, in preference to that of the latter. And this the more earnestly, the more we value the blessings they are empowered to dispense : which again will depend upon our sense of eternal things, the horror we feel at our own manifold trans- 74 IMPLICIT FAITH gressions, and our anxiety to keep as near to our Saviour as we can. To have touched here on the question of the Ministry may be excusable, because so many of those, who think and talk of such subjects, seem either to undervalue it altogether, or to rest their anxiety about it on grounds comparatively inade- quate. They are content to plead the ill effects of swerving from the established order of things ; the heresy, which is apt to follow on schism ; and the like : arguments of great weight in themselves, but less availing than they might be, from our neglecting to support them, openly and fearlessly, with the plain and brief consideration, what the love of Christ, and respect for Him as our common Master, would suggest at first thought. Besides, this last application exemplifies a very general and important use of the Apostolic principle of interpretation, on which I have been enlarging : viz. that where the Church is silent, it is one of the best helps in determining what is important in discussions about religion, and what may be as. well passed over. Nothing in the whole world is really important, except so far as it may be brought to bear upon religion. This is the dictate of reason to every one who believes a future state of retri- bution. Nothing in religion itself is important, except so far as it may be brought to bear upon practice. This is the uniform tenor of the Bible, and of the Church's dogmatical decisions ; and it RECONCILED WITH FREE ENQUIRY. 75 is pronounced., with peculiar emphasis, in the words of the text. Let us endeavour to regulate, not only our studies, but our lives, by this divine rule : remembering that it may be violated more ways than one. The theologian, who exerts him- self on matters of mere curiosity, may lose his time and labour : but the Christian, who contemplates the most profitable subjects without exerting him- self to profit by them, loses his chance of happiness for ever. " Let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another. For every man shall bear his own burden." SERMON IV.' INIQUITY ABOUNDING. ST. MATT. xxiv. 12. . . . iniquity shall abound. THAT such mournful occasions as the present should continue to recur, year after year, in a Christian country ; with symptoms apparently un- mitigated by the progress which knowledge and refinement have for so long a time confessedly been making this cannot but excite very serious and awful reflections in those, who are disposed to regard life in a religious point of view, and not to let things pass unthought of, only because they are frequent and familiar. Indeed, if men will childishly look on these solemnities only as pageants, without intending to be at all the better for them or if they take up a Preached at the Lent Assize, St. Mary's, Oxford, March 6, 1823. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 77 with the narrow and short-sighted views of the mere worldly politician respecting them it is no wonder if they go away, as under the same dis- position of mind they go away from public worship, not the better, but the worse, for their attendance on it. For the administration of justice, of criminal justice particularly, in the graver cases, is in many respects not unlike the public worship of God. To His especial presence there is constant appeal made in the one as well as in the other. In pro- portion as men allow themselves to attend on either out of mere levity or curiosity, they run a risk of hardening their own consciences, and deadening their sense of right and wrong b . And though public worship, of the two, be the more immediately concerned with men's eternal welfare, yet, if the administration of justice have any thing at all to do with it, however incidentally and indirectly, it is surely as real an offence against reason to leave another world out of sight on these occasions, as it would be to confine one's estimate of the purposes of social worship to bare external decency, and the peace and order of civil society. It is an absurdity, too, particularly unworthy of refined and educated minds. For they ought ever to be distinguished by taking the largest b Cf. Butler's Analogy, p. 1. c. 5. p. 116. Oxf. Ed. 1807. 78 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. views, and selecting what is most important, in every subject, as matter of chief consideration. Considering, then, in this enlarged way of think- ing, the abundance of crimes and lawsuits, so far as it is indicative, not now of the civil and social, but of the spiritual, condition of our age ; con- sidering it as one instance of " iniquity abounding" among us ; we may find ourselves engaged in a train of thought, not only melancholy, but at first sight also perplexing. For " what," it may be enquired, " is, after all, the great benefit of Christianity ? It came into the world, professing to bring with it a sovereign remedy for all the diseases of our moral nature. It has now been among men for eighteen hundred years, and the world seems, on a large view of it, to be much about where it was c . Some degrading customs may be obsolete, some brutish vices dis- countenanced. But the temper of men in general seems as worldly and selfish, as far from true goodness and happiness, as ever. How," it may be asked, " are such things consistent with the claim advanced in the Gospel to superior know- ledge of ( what was in man,' and to the praise of being exactly adapted to his nature ? or with what we are told of the temper and conduct of those, who first gave in their names to the Christian institution ?" Such thoughts as these may indeed make a c Cf. Miller's Bampton Lectures, pp. 7176, 129131. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 79 Christian sorrowful, and ought to render him very circumspect. But he need not be long perplexed by them. For it may, without much difficulty, be shewn, that the very depravity, by which the Church is overrun, and by which unbelievers would startle and confound her advocates, fur- nishes, in fact, an irrefragable argument for her divine authority as the representative of our Blessed Lord. It was the great subject of His own express prophecy : and that prophecy so peculiar in its tone and circumstances > as to be distinguished, not only from casual coincidences, or sagacious glances at futurity, but also from all inspired predictions ever delivered by mere men. Some perhaps maybe inclined to doubt, whether it is correct to speak of the iniquity of our own times as having been within the immediate con- templation of our Saviour, when He delivered the prophecy in the text. I would just observe, therefore, that the general argument on which I am about to enter, as well as many of the practical conclusions, to which the whole enquiry may give rise, will be found to stand unaffected by such a difference of interpretation. But, indeed, it is hardly possible to explain this chapter of St. Matthew consistently, without con- sidering it as a general description of the latter times, or days of the Messiah : i. e. of the whole period of time from the first promulgation of 80 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. Christianity to the end of the world. The struction of the city and temple of Jerusalem, the first great event of the New Dispensation, is brought prominently forward, to be, as it were, a voucher for the correctness of the whole re- presentation, to such as lived in those times. And therefore it is given with more of detail, than any other part of the prophecy : so that when it should come to pass, the men of that generation, beholding the wonderful agreement of the event with the prediction, might be forced to confess, that all was indeed being fulfilled, exactly as Jesus Christ had foretold d . The destruction therefore of Jerusalem stands in order of time rather as the beginning, than as the termination, of this awful prophecy. In support of this it should be considered, that the prediction, when first delivered, was a private one : not heard by the Jewish nation, but by four only of the chosen Apostles e . We must then look upon it as addressed to Christians, not to Jews. And one should expect it to turn principally upon d Cf. v. 34. in which, on any interpretation of the prophecy, (except it be wholly confined to the destruction of Jerusalem,) the phrase navra ravra must mean " this entire state of things," rather than " each particular thing mentioned." See S. Chrys. in loc. who explains yei/ea to mean " this kind of generation ;" a constant succession of believers : " oiSe yap yeveav OVK OTTO xpovov %apa.KTr)piiv povov, aXXa KOL aV6 rpojrov Bprjo-Keias KO.I TroXireias." e St. Mark xiii. 3. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 81 the fortunes of Christianity, not to terminate in those of the Jewish Church. The question likewise of the Apostles, to which it was an answer, referred primarily indeed to the downfall of the temple, but principally to the establishment and fortunes of the New Dis- pensation. " Tell us, when shall these things be ? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world ?" The Apostles seem to have imagined, not un- naturally, that when once the Jewish city and temple were destroyed, the old things passed away, and the days of the Messiah begun, all would be peace, righteousness, and mercy, and the sin and miseries of mankind would cease for ever. Jesus Christ, therefore, is careful to explain to them, on this as on many other occasions, that although they judged quite rightly of the natural and essential tendencies of the Gospel, they were greatly mistaken as to its real results in this world. " Think not that I am come to send peace on the earth : I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to divide a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter- in-law against her mother-in-law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household'." On f St. Matt. x. 3437. coll. St. Luke xi. 49, 5153. Perhaps what is said of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, and the accompanying parable of the relapsed daemoniac, in that chapter of St. Luke, and in the 12th of St. Matthew, has some reference of this kind. G 82 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. another occasion, when the approaching reign of the Messiah had been the topic of discourse with the Pharisees, He turned to His disciples with an admonition, well calculated to check any too sanguine expectations, which the bare mention of His reign would be likely to excite within them. " g Days will come, when ye shall desire to see one of the days of the Son of Man," (i. e. to recall the times when I was with you visibly on earth,) " and shall not see it." " As the days of Noe were, and as the days of Lot were, so shall it be in the days of the Son of Man." He will not shew Himself again, till the world is sunk into such a state of irreligion and iniquity, as can only be paralleled by the sinners just before the flood, or by Sodom before the fire and brimstone fell upon it from heaven. It is reasonable to understand this later and not less solemn denunciation, of which the text forms a part, as addressed in great measure to the same state of mind in His Apostles. " You think all is going to be rectified, and the world to become a Paradise again. But I forewarn you to expect no such thing. There will still be false Christs, i. e. false religions, wars, earthquakes, famines, pestilences, troubles in the world at large : and what is worse, and more contrary to g St. Luke xvii. 17 37: continued, apparently, with special reference to the duties most essential in an apostate world, in c. xviii. 1 14, INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 83 your expectations, there will not only be per- secution against the Church from without, but all sorts of apostasy and iniquity within. Then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another : and many false prophets shall arise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of the many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. And this Gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world, for a witness unto all nations : and then shall the end come." The whole, I say, of the prophecy down to this point, appears to convey a general description of the latter times, or days of the Messiah, intended, amongst other purposes, to counteract the too flattering hopes of the disciples : which being provided for, the direct and immediate sign of the destruction of Jerusalem, (itself possibly a type of something to precede in like manner the end of the world",) is distinctly specified: i.e. "the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place." From this it appears, that in describing the con- dition of mankind under the New Dispensation, which Jesus Christ was about to bring into the world, He expressly inserted this circumstance, that in it " iniquity should abound." Iniquity, or b Cf. Dan. xi. 31. xii. 11. ix.27. (coll. Es. x,23.) and perhaps 2 Thess. ii. 3, 4. N.B. also, the same caution given in St. Matt. xxiv. 16, &c. is given in St. Luke xvii. 31, &c. G2 84 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. transgression of the law, means sin, or immorality in general. This we know by St. John's definition : " Whosoever committeth sin, transgresseth also the law. For sin is the transgression of the law 1 :" r) afjiaprla earlv rj dvojmla. This transgression Christ declares should be " multiplied :" the word is as strong as possible, to express almost unlimited increase and repetition 1 ". And it is added, that in consequence of this, " the love of many" it should be, of " the greater part" would " wax cold." That is, the prevailing immorality of the times would gradually extinguish charity, or the love of God, in the generality of mankind. They would no longer consent to forego their own wishes for His sake ; they would no longer make it the business of their lives to please Him. And this, not from ignorance of the great things He had done for them: for it is not of dark ages that our Lord is speaking, but of times, in which " the Gospel is to be preached in all the world, for a witness unto all nations l ." Now that iniquity, in this sense of plain dis- obedience to. God's laws, does positively " abound" to a great extent among us : this seems so very evident, that one should hardly know how to go about to prove it, if it were denied. One or two 1 1 St. John iii. 4. k Acts vii. 17. Heb. vi. 14. 1 St. Pet. i. 2. 2 Cor. ix. 10. 1 Cf. Dan. xii. 4. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 85 obvious considerations may however help us to form a juster estimate of the amount of that evil, which, from its being so close and familiar to us, we are sure, without very particular attention, to under-rate. All the forms and rules of legal and commercial business imply, as much as ever they did, that mankind are, on the whole, wicked and immoral. Hardly any one dares venture his property, his reputation, or his comfort, upon the chance of a stranger's honesty or kindness, without the safe- guard of human laws and punishments. That is, in other words, every one shapes his conduct, in regard to his worldly interests, upon the notion that sin and wickedness abound. More particularly are the enemies of Christianity witnesses, that in this prediction at least, Jesus Christ spake the truth. For one of their main objections to it an objection, for which thousands are the worse, who never advanced it as an express proposition is this: That Christians (i. e. the majority of men, for every one is presumed to call himself a Christian, till we know to the contrary) act as immorally as if they were heathens, and therefore cannot be supposed themselves to believe what they profess. Jesus Christ then anticipated and predicted the general failure of His Gospel, at least for a long period, in working any thing like a complete reformation even among those who should profess 86 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. it: and the event has shewn, by the confession of His adversaries themselves, that He anticipated and predicted truly. Now it is notorious, that those who invent any project for the good of mankind, commonly enter- tain high hopes of the success of their inventions : at least in the outset of their career. A physician, who has discovered a new medicine a mechanist, who has brought a new force into action are seldom found to expect too little fruit of their labours. And it is matter of constant experience that the like holds good in those, who are the first to set on foot extensive plans for the moral and religious improvement of their fellow-creatures. They set out, almost invariably, with expecting, as was emphatically said of one of them, " to convert the world" 1 :" and nothing short of actual expe- rience will undeceive them. A generous enthusiast, therefore, could not have spoken in the tone which our Saviour uniformly adopts on this subject. It is against the very nature of enthusiasm. Still less would an impostor have 'thought it prudent thus openly to augur defeat. Besides, it is clear that in either of these cases the prediction would have adapted itself to the Jewish prophecies, as they would be generally and obviously understood. Now the tone, which at first sight appears to prevail in the Jewish pro- m Law's Letter to J. Wesley, in Southey's Life. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 87 phecies, whenever the reign of the Messiah is spoken of, is a tone as unlike what has been de- scribed, as can well be imagined. Consider such expressions as the following n : " Thy people also shall be all righteous." " I will direct their work in truth, and will make an everlasting covenant with them : and their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people : all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed." " The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid, and the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice den. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain : for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea." Any anticipations which could be derived from hence, would evidently be the very reverse of iniquity abounding, and the love of the greater part waxing cold. Concerning these and similar passages of the Old Testament, I would farther remark, that even after all the warnings of our Saviour, and after the event has gone so far towards leading us to seek another interpretation of them, they are still made to justify assertions, too sanguine, I fear, and fanciful to be of much practical use, of the actual improve- ment of Christendom in holiness and virtue, and of n Is. lx. 21. Ixi. 8, 9. xi. 69. 88 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. the apparent dawning of a state of things, even in this world, in which sin and sorrow shall be, com- paratively, no more. Much more must it have appeared natural, in the time of our Saviour, to expect something like a real reformation of the world upon the establishment of the New Dis- pensation. These anticipations would, of course, grow more and more sanguine, as the observer came to know more and more of the perfection of the new doctrines, and also of the overpowering evidence the mighty hand and out-stretched arm by which they were upheld and furthered. Now, no one could be so thoroughly aware of these things could have such entire knowledge, either of the perfection of His doctrines, or of the amount of their evidence as our Blessed Lord Himself. And therefore His foretelling, in spite of all this, the real state of things just as we behold it, is the strongest possible proof that He was indeed a Prophet, and more than a Prophet : and that He knew, in a way peculiar to Himself, all that was in man. I say, " in a way peculiar to Himself." For it will appear upon consideration, that there is indeed something very peculiar in the tone of these pre- dictions : something quite different, not only from the natural expectations of uninspired men, but also from the manner of His inspired messengers themselves, whether before or after His coming. It is true indeed, that the more we know of INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 89 human nature, the less shall we be inclined to reckon certainly upon success in any method pro- posed for ameliorating it. Accordingly, we find that Socrates, the wisest, practically, of the ancient philosophers, was also, apparently, the least san- guine, openly declaring, that he did not expect men would ever be taught what was really good for them, except by an interposition from above ; and anticipating the probable fate of a perfectly righteous man, if such should appear on earth, in the following very remarkable words p . " Let us suppose him (says he) doing no injury, to have on him the strongest imputation of injustice : let him not swerve even unto death, accounted unrighteous throughout his life, but being righteous. Under these circumstances, the just man will be scourged, racked, imprisoned, his eyes burned out at last, suffering all manner of evils, will perish by a vile and tormenting death." It is to be observed, however, that these words were not written, till after the event had shewn, what kind of success a philosopher might expect in his benevolent efforts for the good of mankind. There is nothing to make us believe, that Socrates did not look forward hopefully, at first, to the fruit of his labours, in the reformation of his country- men. And when he speaks of a possible divine revelation, it does not appear that he at all contem- Plat. Alcib. 2. p. 150. Op. t. ii. Ed. Serrani. P Plat., de Rep. ii. p. 361. 90 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. plated any probability of its failing in this respect. The tone, in which that dialogue is conducted, would rather lead one to infer the contrary. Ill as his experience had taught him to think of the chance of bringing mankind to a truer sense of their own interest, it never entered his thoughts to apprehend, that an interposition even from God Himself might be so far frustrated by the wicked- ness of His creatures. But the singularity of our Lord's manner of speaking on this subject will be still more evident, upon comparing it with that of former Prophets ; with Moses, for instance, or with Elijah ; the most remarkably gifted of them all, and therefore the fittest to be brought into comparison with Him on this argument. No portion perhaps of the Old Testament sounds so nearly in unison with His predictions, or speaks in so calm and decided a tone of the certain falling off of those, to whom it was addressed, as do the concluding chapters of the book of Deute- ronomy' 1 . " I know thy rebellion, and thy stiff neck : behold, while I am yet alive with you this day, ye have been rebellious against the Lord ; and how much more after my death ! Gather vinto me all the elders of your tribes, and your officers, that I may speak these words in their ears, and call heaven and earth to record against them. For I know that after my death ye will utterly corrupt i Deut. xxxi. 2729. cf. v. 16, 20, 21. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 91 yourselves, and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you ; and evil will befal you in the latter days ; because ye will do evil in the sight of the Lord, to provoke Him to anger with the work of your hands." But when these words were written, Moses was very old, and had been used for forty years to see his countrymen rebel against God, even in sight of His glory, and while " the meat," which they received by miracle, was yet " between their teeth." Consider him in the outset of his ministry, and before the effect of those wonderful manifestations had been tried, and he too will appear to have been sanguine at first : as indeed who would not have been, with such means as he had in his hands ? None but a sanguine person would have broken the tables of the Covenant, upon seeing the people worshipping the molten calf r . It was the act of a man bitterly disappointed : forced to part in a moment with expectations long and fondly cherished, and, humanly speaking, not unreasonable, of seeing the fruit of God's mercy, and his own labours, in the steady obedience of his people. Again : when God had so signally answered the prayers of Elijah by fire on mount Carmel, and the backsliders had been driven in spite of them- selves to acknowledge the true God, and, what was more, to aid His minister in the slaughter of the 1 Exod. xxxii. 19. 92 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. worshippers of Baal ; it was no wonder, if the Prophet expected much more lasting amendment than he found: if he felt weary of the world, and in his disappointment prayed to die, when he saw persecution and idolatry likely to be still as pros- perous as ever". But it is indeed a wonder, and bespeaks evidently the presence of one greater than Elijah or Moses, to observe Jesus Christ, with all His miracles, and with such discoveries as He had to make, never for a moment miscalculating in the same way. There are no traces, in His demeanour, of any such revolution of thought, as most speculative men sooner or later experience, when their first visions of approaching general improvement are to be exchanged, more or less suddenly, for sadder, but more correct, and therefore (if it be not their own faults) more useful, views. He speaks sorrowfully indeed, and most affectingly, but not like one dis- appointed. There is no difference, in this respect, between the end of His ministry and the beginning : between His address to His own city Nazareth, where, if any where, He might fairly have depended upon doing much good, and His mournful expostu- lation with Jerusalem in the last week of His life. " If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things that belong unto thy peace ! but now they are hid from thine eyes'." 8 1 Kings xix. 4. < St. Luke iv. 1630. coll. c. xix. 4144. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 93 His calm forebodings, every now and then, of the ruinous effect, which the knowledge of the Gospel would have upon very many, sound most exceedingly aweful : " This is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil." And, " If they hear not Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." An evident allusion to the way, in which His last and greatest miracle would be generally resisted and made void, as the witness of the Old Testament had been u . Yet farther : the very Apostles of our Lord, after all His warnings, could hardly bring them- selves to anticipate any thing like the present fallen state of the Church. The way to make this out most clearly, will be to compare their earlier with their later writings, and see which of the two exhibit most of the tone and manner of our Blessed Saviour in this respect : St. Peter's first Epistle, for instance, with his second : or St. Paul writing to the Galatians, evidently under a feeling of surprise at the introduction of a spirit of Judaism, with the same St. Paul, calmly warning the Hebrews against an approaching spirit of prac- tical unbelief, and entire apostasy. The second Epistle to Timothy, if carefully examined, will be found to present, in the tone of the writer, some remarkable points of difference u St. John iii. 19. St. Luke xvi. 31. 94 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. from the first. Both contain prophecies of " a falling away" in the latter times. But the first speaks, apparently, of avowed unbelief: "In the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits." The other, of what is far more disheartening, and less likely to be calculated on beforehand : " In the last days perilous times shall come. For," not " some," but " the generality of men" ol avOpwiroL " the men of those times" " shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, truce-breakers, false accusers, in- continent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God; having the form of godliness, but denying the power thereof x ." Both these Epistles, again, speak of individuals who had fallen away from Christ, but with a similar variation of manner. In the first Epistle, " Some having put away a good conscience, concerning faith have made shipwreck." " Some have erred from the faith." " Some have already turned aside after Satan :" as though it were matter of surprise. Whereas in the second Epistle, when he comes to speak of similar cases, the tone of surprise is greatly abated, and that of sorrow deepened. " This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me." " Demas hath forsaken me, having x 1 Tim. iv. 13. coll. 2 Tim. iii. 19. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 95 loved this present world ;" " At my first answer no man stood with me, but all men forsook me : I pray God that it may not be laid to their charge y ." Yet even in these instances, particularly the last, how unlike is the manner of speaking to that of Jesus Christ upon such occasions ! " Do ye now believe ? Behold, the hour cometh, yea is now come, that ye shall be scattered every man to his own, and shall leave Me alone." " Wilt thou lay down thy life for My sake ? Verily I say unto thee, The cock shall not crow, till thou hast denied Me thrice 2 ." The one speaks as an Omniscient Being, to whom nothing was wonderful. The other as a poor frail man, liable to be deceived, from time to time, in his best hopes and surest reckonings. Upon this subject, of what St. Paul anticipated, I cannot forbear citing one passage, as associating itself, more immediately, with the occasion of the present solemnity. Some of the Corinthians, it seems, being at variance one with another, had brought their cause before the customary judi- cature of the city. St. Paul denounces this as unchristian, and this is the remonstrance which he addressed to them a . " Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust," i. e. the heathens, " and not before the y 1 Tim. i. 19. vi. 10. v. 15. coll. 2 Tim. i. 15. iv. 10, 16. 1 St. John xvi. 31, 32. xiii. 38. a 1 Cor. vi. 19. 96 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. saints ? Do ye not know, that the saints shall judge the world ? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters ? Know ye not that we shall judge angels ? how much more things that pertain to this life ? I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you ? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren ? But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers ! Now, therefore, there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong ? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded ? Nay, ye do wrong and defraud, and that your brethren. Know ye not, that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God?" He who writes in this strain, could he possibly have anti- cipated, in a country where Christianity has been long established, and in which it is an affront, to suppose a man an unbeliever could he, I say, have anticipated such a state of things, as that of which we are witnesses ? prisons so crowded, suits so numerous and various, statutes so rapidly multi- plying, a large profession constantly and laboriously employed, courts almost incessantly sitting, assizes twice a year ? It is plain, that no such thing ever entered into his thoughts : and if he had been to frame prophecies for himself, this was of all pictures the least likely for him to have drawn, of the times in which the Gospel should be very generally re- ceived. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 97 One observation more, and the argument, as far as concerns the New Testament, may be regarded as tolerably complete. Let it be examined, which of all its human authors appear to have had the deepest sense of the universal degeneracy, which was to be looked for among Christians. They will appear to have been the very persons, who from birth or other causes were likely to have imbibed most of the sentiments of Jesus Christ Himself: St. James and St. Jude, who are called in Scripture His brethren ; and St. John His beloved disciple. These, when they speak of approaching apostasy, speak calmly and decisively, as of a familiar, though very sorrowful, thought b . When they recommend moral duties, they do it as men who are aware that the great majority of their hearers will devise how to slight or evade them. Every where they assume, that those to whom they address themselves know the truth, and that it is but the plain common sense of doing their duty, in which they are deficient c . They, therefore, lay their danger before them, not as though they reckoned upon doing much good by it, but as if it were their best and only chance of doing any. This, though not without exception, is the prevailing tone of the three brethren of our Lord. But it is, I think, uniformly and without b 1 S. John ii. 18. iv. 3, 5. 2 S. John 7, 8. S. Jude 4, 17, 18. c e. g. S. James i. 13, 22. ii. 12, 14. 1 S. John ii. 29. iii. 7, 18. iv. 20. v. 1821. 2 S. John 5, 6. 3 S. John 11. S. Jude 3,20,21. H 98 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. exception, the tone of our Blessed Lord Himself in His public ministrations. The falsehood, then, of our religion the fraud or enthusiasm of its Author is the very last con- clusion, to which a reasonable man would be led, upon considering the abundance of iniquity in the Christian world. On the contrary, things have been so ordered, that the very degeneracy of the Church is bearing, at this moment, the strongest possible testimony to the divine authority of Jesus Christ. For in it a prophecy is accomplishing before our eyes, so unlike what could have been expected when it was first delivered, that His own friends and apostles, as we have now seen, could hardly bring themselves to receive it ; and do not seem to have apprehended its full import, even when they repeated it themselves. To find fault, therefore, with the Gospel, as many do, for not having made men better than they are, is to find fault with it for not having done that, which its Founder never expected it would do : nay, that in which He expressly pre- dicted its failure. If men will go on to ask, How these things should be ? how we can possibly reconcile it to infinite wisdom and goodness, that so large a portion of the world should be in that strange and frightful condition, which is implied in the words, " immoral Christian ;" with a God, a Saviour, and a judgment to come, known and believed by almost INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 99 all in theory, and, almost as universally, slighted in practice : the same account may be given of this, as of the permission of moral evil in general : that we cannot possibly be competent judges, how far it may conduce towards carrying on some greater scheme of Divine Wisdom, of which we, and all our concerns, form only a subordinate part. And we may apply, particularly, to the present subject, what Bishop Butler has remarked on this whole class of difficulties : " It is not impossible, that men's shewing and making manifest, what is in their heart, what their real character is, may have respect to a future life, in ways and manners which we are not acquainted with : particularly it may be a means (for the Author of Nature does not appear to do any thing without means) of their being disposed of suitably to their characters ; and of its being known to the creation, by way of ex- ample, that they are thus disposed of d ." But whether this, or any other, be accepted, as a probable, though imperfect, solution of present appearances, (and surely any thing is more probable than Atheism) : it is clear that the difficulty, as far as it respects the Scripture, is entirely done away with, when it is seen, that the Scriptures them- selves recognise and imply the very same state of things, which seems so unaccountable at first. There are some passages, which appear to repre- sent it in this particular point of view: viz. as a d Anal. p. i. c. 5. Works, Oxford, 1807. vol. ii. p. 145. H'2 100 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. cause of mental perplexity to speculative and curious men. Possibly the expression, " Mystery of Iniquity 6 / used so significantly in one place, may have respect to something of this kind. It seems to be set in opposition to the Mystery of Godliness : the one standing for the whole of what God would do to save mankind; the other, for the whole of what they would do to ruin themselves : and the word Mystery giving us to understand, that there would be something, at first sight, startling and unaccountable, something contrary to all human speculations, in the one as well as in the other. To conclude : It being morally demonstrable, as I am persuaded it is upon a general view of Scrip- ture, (whatever may be thought of the aptitude of particular citations,) that we are living in the times, are ourselves among the persons, concerning whom these prophecies were delivered this is indeed a thought, not hastily to be dismissed from the mind of any reasonable person. If a man knew on good authority, that Jesus Christ did, at such and such a time, make mention of the particular date and place of His own birth, declaring also that all persons, then and there born, would live in peculiar danger ; in " a perilous time ;" in " days which must be shortened, or no flesh could be saved;" would it not be a very pressing call upon that man, to walk in fear and trembling ; to mistrust appearances, and the judgment of the e 2 Thess. ii. 7. cf. Rev. xvii. 5. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 101 world ; to mistrust himself, and his own standard of right and wrong, and to feel rfio : security, but in the constant exercise of humiliation 1 / self-denial, and prayer ? The words formerly* address^ ; to, one in the act of quitting a home just about to be destroyed, would very nearly describe, I should think, the temper most becoming and natural in one, who knew himself to be concerned in such a prophecy. " Escape for thy life, look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain : escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed." It would be particularly unsuitable for him to allow himself to be satisfied with the praise of an age, which, he knew on such high authority, measured things by so defective a standard. He could not reasonably flatter himself, upon having observed the law of the land, or kept up a good character among his neighbours. For all this, at most, would only shew, that he was not the worst, outwardly, in a bad world. But of his progress in charity in the love of God in the resignation of the whole will and purpose of heart entirely to Him and His service, it would prove absolutely nothing. Now, whatever frame of mind would be natural and reasonable in a person so circumstanced, is natural and reasonable for every Christian living in the latter times : as much so, as if the prophecies had been addressed to each individual by name; unless we will say, that the danger is less imminent because there are so many to share in it ; or that 102 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. the description does not apply to us and our times, because it is spread over so large a portion of history besides/ and takes in so many who have lived before" us.. ;*' These things, or something equivalent to them, may indeed and will be said. Nor does there seem much reason to hope, that any great portion of those concerned in our Lord's warning, will ever be brought to see their own defection and danger in the just and true light. Warning has been long ago given, that " evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived 6 ." And there is a sort of blinding power in this moral disease, which makes the result but too probable, even were it not matter of prophecy. Men cannot comprehend their own perils, because, being more and more used to self-indulgence, they cannot perceive how it should be so ruinous as it is : much on the same principle that the Saints, entering most into the mind of Him Who was alone without sin, have all along been most thoroughly enabled to discern clearly from the beginning, and state as matter of course, the full amount of the mischief it would do. Meanwhile it is infinitely important to observe; that great and near as the danger surely is, it is, as surely, in each individual's own power to escape from it if he will. As an earnest of which, we see it is wonderfully ordered, that the visible Church e 2 Tim. iii. 13. INIQUITY ABOUNDING. 103 of Christ should still continue among us according to His promise, in the full enjoyment of all the means of grace, and generally acknowledged even by those, whose lives are most adverse to the Gospel. And, as far as we can see, there is as little chance of its ever being extinguished, as there is of its members ever becoming, generally, such as they profess and ought to be. Let us recollect also, that we have to do with a good and gracious Father, Who has promised in one instance, and will doubtless perform it in all, that " if there be first a willing mind," a sincere alacrity in doing His will, He will accept it " ac- cording to that a man hath, and not according to that he hath not f ." We may hope that a less degree of positive holiness, if it were the very best a man could attain to, under his circumstances, may be as richly crowned hereafter, as a greater progress would have been in better and less se- ducing times. It ought not to need remarking, that this is said to prevent despondency, not to encourage sloth and self-indulgence. Finally: If there be any one temper of mind, which suits better than others with so aweful a situation as Christians are now placed in, it is the temper of perfect resignation and singleness of purpose : a constant inward appeal, as it were, from a bad and seducing world to a good God, Who cannot flatter or deceive us. These dispositions f 2 Cor. viii. 12. 104 INIQUITY ABOUNDING. will carry us through all our duties, whether public or private, with the least possible countenance to the prevailing degeneracy; and with as much real inward satisfaction, as can prudently be looked for in the present state of things : thankfully remem- bering, that the very same persons, among whom it was foretold, " Iniquity should abound," and " the love of the generality wax cold/* are also those for whose benefit the gracious promise was added, "He that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved." SERMON V. DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. ROM. i. 20. Who, knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. THE temper described in this verse is the worst form of moral degradation ; consisting not so much in want of principle, as in principles positively bad and ruinous. Which distinction is more clearly marked in the original by the use of the two verbs Troielv and irpdrTtiv. " The civilized and enlight- ened heathen" so the Apostle seems to say "were fully aware of the sentence, the judicial sentence of God Almighty, declaring that such as practise (ol irpdacrovTes) outrageous immoralities, are worthy of death : yet they could find in their hearts, not only to commit those actions, (ov JJLOVOV avra TTOLOVCTL^) which might have happened under strong impulse, contrary to their own habitual feelings : but also a Preached before the University of Oxford, Jan. 30, 1831. 106 DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. to consent to such as practise them, rols TrpdcrcrovorL^) to acquiesce in them thoroughly, and be well-pleased with them." Here, as with the finishing touch, and the darkest of all, he completes his picture of that intense depravity, from which Christ came to rescue the Gentile world : emphatically implying, that worse could not be, on this side the region of unmingled evil. Assuredly it would be a fatal mistake, to limit this aweful denunciation to those only, whose cir- cumstances tempt them directly to participate in great and heinous crimes : or to imagine that, living as we do in an age of Christian light and instruc- tion, we can have no great occasion to deprecate these worst excesses of heathenish wickedness. The effect on society, the immediate effect, is indeed greatly mitigated ; but the effect on our own character is the same, when we have pleasure in the guilty, as such, though we cannot, or dare not, perform their worst actions. Those who are kept, so far, innocent, merely from irresolution or want of energy which state of mind is infallibly indicated by the imagination delighting to dwell on wickedness cannot well be conceived of as less guilty, in the eyes of an All-seeing God, than if they had been allowed to accomplish their own evil dreams. And wilfully persisting in such in- ward licence, for any considerable length of time, their condition may seem, in one respect, the more DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION, 107 dangerous for this involuntary restraint. It has less chance of being amended by outward reverses, or the reproof of others : it gives less room for the sort of reaction, which is apt to ensue on great and palpable transgressions, and to make the re- morse and repentance of ardent minds as signal as their guilt had been. There is the more reason therefore, and the more mercy, in those numerous denunciations of Scripture, which represent us as partaking in other men's sins, merely by brooding over them in fancy, with any thing like indulged approbation or sympathy. Two kinds of immorality may be named, in which, more readily perhaps than in others, men's unchastened imaginations are apt to involve them : sins of sensuality, and sins of rebellion. For just as in the former of these two instances, reading, hearing, or seeing mischief, if the heart at all consent to it, may plunge a man in intense guilt, though shame, fear, or want of opportunity, put a bar on overt actions of sin : so it is possible, as we read history, or hear news, to learn a vicious sympathy with rebellion or oppression. I name the two thus together, because they are but two names for the same evil tendency within us, only acting in opposite directions. Discontented, covetous tempers, I say, as naturally exercise themselves in brooding over past, or imaginary, or distant, examples of successful rebellion, or triumphant 108 DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. violence, as debauched and sensual hearts do in those which most naturally occur to them. There is, indeed, a closer analogy between these two vices, than many, at first sight, would be apt to imagine : and Scripture accordingly names them together, as equally descriptive of those degenerate Christians, who might be expected to arise in the latter days. They who " defile the flesh/' we are told, will also be the readiest to " despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities." " These speak evil of those things which they know not :" calumniate, where they are incompetent to judge : " but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves." " These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts, and their mouth speaketh great swelling words of vanity." They " walk after the flesh, in the lust of unclean- ness, and despise government." " While they promise" their disciples " liberty," " they them- selves are slaves of corruption." Nor is this connection hard to account for. It is the same love of excitement, and impatience of pure and quiet satisfactions; venting itself, ordi- narily, in wild and wanton pleasures ; and flaming out, when opportunity is given, in lawless defama- tion, and rude resistance. These are the visible and actual results, where men have audacity and ability to compass them: but who shall estimate the silent corruption, which they daily and hourly DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. 109 foster in themselves, dreaming of and enjoying the mischief, which they want the heart or the power to realize ? It is possible, therefore, in every department of wickedness, to make one's self partaker in other men's sins, however long ago committed. And in these two ways of sensuality and rebellion, it is even certain, that without overt acts, an infinite load of such guilt is daily incurred by inconsiderate or self-deceiving Christians. Consequently, there is nothing so very absurd, as some men appear to imagine, in deprecating, annually, all participation in a public sin of former days. According to the pattern set us in the Litany, we have cause to humble ourselves for the " iniquities of our fore- fathers," else they will surely become our own. But if ever the descendants of a guilty generation stood in need of continual warning, not to " find pleasure" in their fathers' sins, and so become, like them, " worthy of death :" surely it is so with us of this country, in regard of that series of crimes, of which this day saw the consummation. Whether we consider the general tendency of human opinions on such subjects, or the habitual leaning of the people of England in particular, the experience of every year must shew, I think, to an impartial eye, more clearly than that of the last, how apt men are to have pleasure in those, whom the law of God would charge with rebellion. 110 DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. To say, that mankind in general are disposed to think slightly of this sin, and to encourage it, at least, by seeming pleased with it, is merely saying, that we sympathise most readily with the faults which are prompted by our own situation in life, the temptation to which, therefore, we are able most thoroughly to estimate. By the constitution of society, nay, even by the law of domestic life, by far the greater part of mankind stand in an inferior relation to others. Children and subjects are by many more numerous, than magistrates and parents are, and have therefore always a greater number to stand by them, and keep them in coun- tenance. The result is well known to every one, who has ever been called to direct others, as magistrate, teacher, master, or parent. It is what almost all must confess, who will survey their own past demeanour, as children, servants, pupils, or subjects, with any thing like an impartial view. It is the last thing men are ready to own as a fault, their simply refusing to submit and obey. That they have gone too far, in such and such expressions of their contumacy, they are not seldom willing to acknowledge ; but they will scarce ever cordially allow, that they were wrong to be contumacious at all. And what greatly encourages this evil spirit is, that here, as in the matter of sensual indulgence, men commonly, as far as they dare, take the part of their guilty DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. Ill neighbours ; from a secret consciousness, it is to be feared, that themselves are, or soon may be, more or less partakers in their guilt. Further : in spite of habitual recklessness, our moral nature, generally speaking, will have its way so far, that some pretence of good will be accept- able, even to the most profligate of men, to justify the pleasure he takes in the wicked : and it is obvious to remark, that insubordination, in this respect, has greatly the advantage of sensual vices. For as no human administration can be perfect, there never shall be wanting some colour of op- pression, towards which it will be easy, if we choose, to turn our minds so exclusively, that all our presumption and self-will shall pass off, in our own account, for a generous hatred of wrong, and concern for the weaker party. When the question really lies between submission and resistance, we have an artful way of putting it to ourselves, as if it lay between resistance and oppression : as if the merely not interfering, where one has the power to do so, made a man partaker in the wrong. Of course, there are some such cases ; but it may be questioned, perhaps, not unreasonably, whether they do not occur oftener on the side of authority than against it: and at any rate, what is called " the heroic temper," the love of excitement, credit, and consequence, is sufficiently awake in human nature, to allow enough for those instances, without any special care of the moralist. On this 112 DANGER OF SYMPATHIZING WITH REBELLION. head, as in the regulation of the bodily appetites, the theorist may conceive an excess of apathy, but the stress of warning surely must be laid, almost or altogether, on the side opposed to in- dulgence. These observations are remarkably confirmed by the total silence of Holy Scripture, as to any exceptions from the general rule of not actively resisting civil authorities : a silence so obvious and emphatical, as to be confessed even by those moralists, who are disposed to make the greatest allowance for our natural impatience of control ; and carrying with it, by their own statement, this very important conclusion, that obedience to rulers and magistrates is, in His judgment Who cannot err, as sacred a duty as filial obedience, and admits only of the same kind of exceptions. According to which, no calculations of expediency, no amount of public or private good, would justify a subject in violently resisting authority, except in such an extreme case, as would justify a child under pupillage in violently resisting a father or mother. The duty cannot be well stated lower, on the principles of Paley himself a . a Moral Philosophy, b. vi. .4. " [The Scriptures] enforce the obligation [to civil obedience] by the proper sanctions of Chris- tianity, without intending either to enlarge or contract, without considering, indeed, the limits by which it is bounden. This is also the method in which the same Apostles enjoin the duty of servants to their masters, of children to their parents, of wives to their husbands," &c. DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. 113 But however that may be, the studious omission, throughout the Bible, of any word of encourage- ment to resistance, is surely a circumstance of more meaning, than we seem, in general, willing to allow. It is, as every one knows, the fashion, to dismiss this consideration at once, with some such remark as the following : That it was no part of our Saviour's mission, to interfere at all in our political conduct : a very unadvised assertion, surely, unless it can be proved that political con- duct involves no moral responsibility. But those who believe that the sanctions and principles of the Gospel were meant to guide us as members of civil society, no less than in the other relations of life, I do not see how they should so lightly forget, that the whole weight of express Gospel precept is thrown unreservedly into the scale of submission. The exceptions, be they rare or frequent, are not however thought needful to be mentioned : and whoever dwells much upon them, either in popular instruction, or in his own views of social duty, is so far at variance with Scripture. Here, again, it is usual to say, that the first Christian converts had wilder notions of liberty, and were more disposed to be turbulent, than mankind in general are ; that passages, therefore, intended for their guidance, required to be very strictly worded, but may be received now with large allowances. It is usual, I say, to affirm this : but for the shadow of any thing like proof of i 114 DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. it, we may search far and wide in vain. If there be one fact in Ecclesiastical History more thoroughly proved than the rest, it is the patient loyalty of the early Christians, under every kind of persecution and injustice, and latterly, in spite of great tempta- tions, from the consciousness of their own number and influence. Is it possible for an unbiassed reader to suppose, that it was fear of their peculiar turbulence, which led the holy writers to speak as they have spoken of the duty of submission ? Was it not rather their deep sense of that inward dislike of authority, which they knew to be rooted in all mankind ? Let us hear the words of one, who was certainly very much on his guard against over- stating the rule of non-resistance. " The Scrip- ture," says Bishop Butler, " throughout the whole of it, commands submission ; supposing men apt enough, of themselves, to make the exceptions, and not to need being continually reminded of them b ." Such is the tone of God's holy word : how ill it harmonizes with the ordinary tone of Christians, speaking or writing on political subjects, all know, who have ears to hear. The lowest statement of the Christian doctrine is that which makes sub- mission the rule, resistance the rare and dangerous exception : would it be speaking too strongly if one said, that the prevalent feeling of Christians is, to sympathize, at once, with such as resist, but b Vol. i. p. 352. in his Sermon for Jan. 30. DANGER OF SYMPATHISING WITH REBELLION. 115 to require unusual energy or talent, before they can be interested for the supporters of authority ? St. Paul has ranked even personal liberty, liberty opposed to the condition of a slave, among other temporal blessings, as an object, comparatively speaking, below the serious concern of a redeemed immortal being. " Art thou called being a slave ? care not for it : but even if thou mayest be made free, put up with it rather c ." That is, " make the best of your condition as it is, rather than grasp, with eager anxiety, at every chance of emanci- pation." And what he says of personal liberty, is true, I suppose, a fortiori, of civil liberty as opposed to subjection. " Care not for it," says the inspired Voice : " let it be your tendency, in this as in all things, rather to improve existing opportunities, than to be always craving after a change of con- dition." But what says the Christian world to this ? Do not men, somehow, think of liberty, as of some- thing unlike other outward blessings, such as health, riches, domestic comfort ? something, the mere pursuing of which, for its own sake, is a part of virtue ? Contented slavery in either kind, are they not apt to pronounce it meanness d ? c *A\X' ei KOL $vva the surest way to uphold or restore our endangered Church, will be for each of her anxious children, in his own place and station, to resign himself more thoroughly to his God and Saviour in those duties, public and private, which are not immediately affected by the emergencies of the moment : the daily and hourly duties, I mean, of piety, purity, charity, justice. It will be a consolation understood by every thoughtful Churchman, that let his occupation be, apparently, never so remote from such great interests, it is in his power, by doing all as a Christian, to credit and advance the cause he has most at heart ; and what is more, to draw down God's blessing upon it. This ought to be felt, for example, as one motive more to exact punctuality in those duties, personal and official, which the return of an Assize week offers to our practice ; one reason more for veracity in witnesses, fairness in pleaders, strict impartiality, self-command, and patience, in those on whom decisions depend ; and for an awful NATIONAL APOSTASY. 147 sense of God's presence in all. An Apostle once did not disdain to urge good conduct upon his proselytes of lowest condition, upon the ground, that, so dping, they would adorn and recommend the doctrine of God our Saviour". Surely, then, it will be no unworthy principle, if any man be more circumspect in his behaviour, more watchful and fearful of himself, more earnest in his petitions for spiritual aid, from a dread of disparaging the holy name of the English Church, in her hour of peril, by his own personal fault or negligence. As to those who, either by station or temper, feel themselves most deeply interested, they cannot be too careful in reminding themselves, that one chief danger, in times of change and excitement, arises from their tendency to engross the whole mind. Public concerns, ecclesiastical or civil, will prove indeed ruinous to those, who permit them to occupy all their care and thoughts, neglecting or undervaluing ordinary duties, more especially those of a devotional kind. ' These cautions being duly observed, I do not see how any person can devote himself too entirely to the cause of the Apostolical Church in these realms. There may be, as far as he knows, but a very few to sympathise with him. He may have to wait long, and very likely pass out of this world before he see any abatement in the triumph of disorder and irreligion. But, if he be consistent, " Titus ii. 10, L2 148 NATIONAL APOSTASY. he possesses, to the utmost, the personal consola- tions of a good Christian : and as a true Church- man, he has that encouragement, which no other cause in the world can impart in the same degree : he is calmly, soberly, demonstrably, SURE, that, sooner or later, HIS WILL BE THE WINNING SIDE, and that the victory will be complete, universal, eternaL He need not fear to look upon the efforts of Antichristian powers, as did the Holy Apostles themselves, who welcomed the first persecution in the words of the Psalmist : " Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing ? " The kings of the earth stand up, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against His Anointed. " For of a truth against Thy Holy Child Jesus, Whom Thou hast anointed, both Herod and Pon- tius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, " FOR TO DO WHATSOEVER THY HAND AND THY COUNSEL DETERMINED BEFORE TO BE DONE ." Acts iv. 25 28. SERMON VII.* CHURCH AND STATE. TSAIAH xlix. 23. And kings shall be thy nursing father s^ and their queens thy nursing mothers. THESE words, few and simple as they are, con- tain in them the force of an entire parable, similar in some respects to those affecting domestic pictures, by which our Divine Master Himself delighted to teach men sacred and saving truth. And perhaps one may observe by the way, that this is a notion which may be applied with some advantage to many portions of the Old Testament, the prophe- tical books more especially. What men, in a light and superficial way, are accustomed to pass over as mere ornaments of oriental poetry, may be found on a closer inspection to contain whole treasures of divine morality, applying immediately to the con- duct of life. There is indeed no occasion, respecting these " Preached before the University on the 26th of June, 1835 : the anniversary of William the Fourth's Accession. 150 CHURCH AND STATE. words of Isaiah in particular, to prove that we are not over-straining figurative language, if we apply them to cases now existing, and to the circumstances of the Christian Church. For by common consent of Christians they are so ap- plied. All, I suppose, or nearly all, who receive the holy Scriptures, are agreed in explaining this famous hymn of Isaiah whether it be called pro- phecy, or precept, or a mixture of both, all agree to interpret it of the case of the Christian Church since the time of Constantine. Even those, who imagine it for the most part yet unfulfilled, looking forward as they do to an sera of millennial happi- ness, yet mix up that happiness so far with certain circumstances of civil government, as to believe, partly on the strength of this particular verse, that the kings and rulers of this world are to be prime agents in the glorious change they look for. And it is notorious, that no one passage of holy Scrip- ture is more continually in the mouths of those, who, for some years past in this country, have been engaged in vindicating the established order of things, against the combined efforts of what I will venture to call antichristian powers of sundry and manifold denominations. Whenever the alliance of Church and State has been attacked, they have met the assailants with the plea, that Scripture itself expressly points out the kings of this world as the ordinary nursing fathers of the Church, and their queens as her nursing mothers. And doubt- CHURCH AND STATE. 151 less they have had great reason in so arguing : but it may be questioned, whether the words have always been taken in the exact meaning which the holy Prophet intended : and what is a much more serious consideration, it may be questioned whether the misinterpretation of them be not one among many encouragements to prevailing errors, which are daily doing more and more mischief both to governments and people, and to the whole Church of God. For is not the common interpretation of these words nearly or exactly such as the following : viz. that the Church, of herself feeble and helpless, and so far like an infant, is committed by Divine Providence to the care of the State, as any child might be to the care of its nurse : consequently, that it depends mainly on State support, and could not well exist, at least could not in any sense flourish, were that support withdrawn, any more than an infant could go on and prosper without the at- tending care of nurses ? From which inevitably a tendency follows, to sacrifice more, much more, of ecclesiastical rights to political expediency, than would be sacrificed, if the Church were deemed independent. Now whether such a tendency, considering all things, be right or wrong, wise or unwise whether the Church, however naturally, in all Christian , lands, allied to the State, were meant to remain independent or no this is not our present question ; 152 CHURCH AND STATE. but simply, whether the analogy adopted by Isaiah will justify the conclusion which has been so frequently deduced from it : whether we are here really taught by the voice of Inspiration to consider the pillar and ground of the truth as an edifice based in any measure on the will of man, however enlightened, and however sincere. It may perhaps appear, on a nearer consideration of the passage, that the meaning is altogether different : that instead of representing the Church as dependent on the State, the holy Prophet in- tended to point out the entire submission which the State owes to the Church : that is, in other words, the entire -submission which God's ministers in temporal things owe to that great enduring plan, which He has set on foot in a lost world for sub- duing all things to Himself. For it is plain on consideration of the context, and indeed it is acknowledged by some of the commentators, that when the Church is told, Kings shall be thy nursing fathers, it is not meant that the Church as an infant is lodged in the arms of the civil power, but that as a mother she lodges her children in its arms. The monarchs and princesses of this world are as foster fathers and foster mothers in the family of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of His Spouse, the Holy Church Universal. Let us observe how the image is gradually introduced, and we shall see, I think, that it is impossible to give it any other turn. CHURCH AND STATE, 153 First, Zion, or the Church, appears in the prophetic vision, as a widowed and bereaved woman. " Zion saith, The Lord hath forsaken me, and my God hath forgotten me." As if not enduring to hear her complain, the voice of the heavenly Comforter immediately interposes : and the chief topic of consolation is, " the children she should have, after she had lost the other ;" or as it stands literally, the " children of her bereave- ment." " Then shalt thou say in thine heart, Who hath begotten me these, seeing I have lost my children, and am desolate, a captive, and removing to and fro : and who hath brought up these ? Behold, I was left alone ; these, where had they been ? Thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I will lift up mine hand to the Gentiles, and set up my standard to the people ; and they shall bring thy sons in their arms, and thy daughters shall be carried upon their shoulders. And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers." Is it not plain, that the office of the nursing parents in the last sentence is the very same with that described in the former one ? It is, to bring the children of the Church in their arms, and to carry them On their shoulders. The latter image will be more exact and congruous, if we understand it, as the phrase of the original directs, of an infant borne in the usual way, partly on the arms and partly on the bosom: according to the beautiful 154 CHURCH AND STATE. picture in the Book of Deuteronomy, in which the Almighty condescends to represent Himself under this very image of a nursing Father, taking charge of Benjamin as His youngest child ; not without allusion to the history of the patriarch Jacob. " Of Benjamin he said, The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him, and the Lord shall cover him all the day long, and he shall dwell between his shoulders V that is, shall be carried on his bosom, as a labouring man on a day of rest takes delight in carrying his children. Whoever will compare the two passages, even to the very wording of the original, will see that they mean one and the same thing : the same which Moses also mentioned when he complained, that he had to carry the people in his bosom, " as a nursing father beneath a sucking child, to the land which God sware unto their fathers c ." And Moses, it will be observed, was by office a kind of type of the civil power in the Church : so that the image of a nursing father would almost seem appropriated^ (ol/cetoz/,) to that subject : as that of a bride is to the Church herself. However, the image in Isaiah, as above explained, is most distinct, and perfectly agreeable to the context. Not so, if the words be understood in what appears to be the more popular way : if the sovereigns of earth be to nurse the Church herself, and not to act as nurses under her. In such a b Deut. xxxiii. 12. c Numbers xi. 12. CHURCH AND STATE. 155 construction there is a violent change of imagery,, such as can hardly be paralleled in the prophetic writings. The Church, which one sentence before was an almost orphaned mother, in this sentence would wear the person of a foundling child : an alteration the more unnatural, since in the very next clause she is again a majestic mother of children : " They shall bow down to thee with their faces to the earth, and shall lick the dust of thy feet. ... I will contend with them that contend with thee, and will save thy children/' Nor can it in reason be objected to this inter- pretation, that the expression used is, " thy nursing fathers and mothers :" since the same way of speaking is used in other places : for example, the persons who educated Ahab's children are called " bringers up" or " nursing fathers" to Ahab d . For indeed the term, however endearing, was in those early times associated with slavery. Foster parents were slaves, or at least dependents on some large family : it was a name expressive of service, as chamberlain or messenger might be. Accordingly we see with what deference the nursing fathers treat the mystical Mother in the vision : " They bow themselves with their faces to the ground, and lick up the dust of her feet." There is indeed one following prophecy, which might seem to countenance the ordinary inter- d 2 Kings x. 1 . 156 CHURCH AND STATE. pretation of the place : namely, where in the sixtieth chapter* it is promised, " Whereas thou hast been forsaken and hated, so that no man went through thee, I will make thee an eternal excel- lency, a joy of many generations. Thou shall also suck the milk of the Gentiles, and thou shall suck the breast of kings" It is clear however, on examining the place, that " giving suck" and " yielding milk" are here put, not as representing the office of a foster parent, but simply to express that nothing, in the days there spoken of, should be thought by the former persecutors too near and dear to be yielded up to God's people. The one passage is not parallel to the other, and cannot therefore affect our explanation of it. The force of the prophetical imagery here being thus in some sort ascertained, it may be well to examine in detail its moral drift and meaning, which the very terms of it shew to be strictly in unison with the services of this, important day. But first, that one may not seem to build too much on the interpretation of a single verse, and that in a highly poetical portion of Scripture, I would just recommend to your consideration, whether the meaning now assigned to that verse be not in sub- stance identical with St. Paul's meaning in a passage professedly didactic : I mean, where he tells the Roman Christians, that the magistrate, even the heathen magistrate, is "a minister of God to them for e Ver. 16. CHURCH AND STATE. 157 good,"0eot> SLOLKOVOS croi elf TO ar/a6ov, And again, that their rulers' expenses must be cheerfully paid, because they are burthened in God's name with a public service, Xeirovpyoi rov GeoO, The figure in- deed adopted by the Apostle differs in some measure from that which the Prophet had employed, the one being taken from a republic, the other from a family ; but there is no difference in the practical import of the two. In both, civil governors are reminded that they are far from independent ; they are in the one place " ministers of God," in the other, nursing fathers under the mystical Sion : in both is declared the immense importance of their function not only to the general welfare, but also to that of each individual Christian ; St. Paul saying, " He is the minister of God to thee for good ;" Isaiah, " Thy sons and daughters," each of them, " shall be carried and borne in their arms :" in both (to add no more) the duty of submission all but unreserved is most emphatically expressed or implied. Bearing this agreement of the Prophet and Apostle in mind, let us proceed to apply their common sentiment as a sort of key to some of the doubts and perplexities, which in the present stage of God's providential government have arisen, or may probably arise, from the blending of things sacred and things civil. For (not to speak of those who maintain, profanely and fanatically, that the State, as such, ought not to be of any religion) I suppose that there now are, and have been ever 158 CHURCH AND STATE. since there was a Church established in the world, two distinct systems, views, or theories, to one or other of which might be referred all opinions and practices concerning what is called the Alliance of Church and State. The one theory supposes it one duty of the civil governor to protect and cherish some religion, as one means among many for secur- ing peace and order in his dominions : the other, considering that there can be but one Church, the one great system ordained by our Lord before His Ascension into Heaven, to which all the promises are made, assigns to civil governors in every land their high Xeirovpyia, or ministry under that Church, namely, to be nursing fathers to her children, training them up in her principles, and by her ordinances, bringing them to her, and keep- ing them with her. Of these two systems, the two interpretations of this famous verse of Isaiah may be taken respectively as types, samples, or speci- mens : and perhaps it may be no bad way of getting at their comparative merits, if we compare their respective results, on some of those branches of duty, public and private, which naturally offer themselves to a loyal Christian's contemplation, as often as this good day returns. To take individual duties first, and to begin with that which is undoubtedly the prominent duty of the day ; loyalty, or affectionate reverence to our Sovereign. Surely the difference is not small, whether we consider him as holding a sacred office,, CHURCH AND STATE. 159 as ordained in a certain sense to perform certain duties in the Church of God ; or simply as stationed over us by God's providence, without any special commission for the Church's welfare. No doubt, a dutiful mind would honour and obey His Majesty in any case : but in acting on the one opinion there will be an immediate conviction of God's presence, a sense of security in being on His side, a humble hope that we are even working with God in the great scheme of the Church Universal. All this and more will be experienced by those who consistently obey kings as the Church's chief ministers, and cannot well be experienced by those who obey them as merely invested with state authority. GOD'S ANOINTED, ever was and will be a phrase of deep and sacred meaning to such as have the fear of God in their hearts. In the commonest acts of submission to royal authority, they will endeavour to have something of the same devout feeling, with which they serve Him in His Church, or listen, for His sake, to the recommendations of His ministers : a feeling which beyond all others, when duly practised, becomes by the blessing of God its own reward. Next, observe what an effect would be produced by this same idea of kingly authority, in restraining the tendency men have to speak evil of rulers. The voice of inspiration teaches over and over, that this practice, indulged and habitual, is one of the most fearful symptoms of irreverence and practical 160 CHURCH AND STATE. atheism : yet it is a sin in which even well-disposed persons are apt to go a good way, out of mere in- consideration, or by way of conforming themselves to the presumptuous liberties of the time. Surely the very thing to check them would be, to recall if possible the old notion, and persuade them, as the truth is, that in wantonly speaking evil of anointed Kings, they are just reviling God through His chosen ministers. In sudden and continually recurring temptations, such as this of evil-speak- ing, not all the arguments that can be offered regarding the mischief done to society, the ill effect on our own minds, and the like, will ever be half so available as the simple feeling that such and such topics have something holy about them, and require to be treated with a certain self-restraint, such as keeps even thoughtless people silent in a Church. I may remark in passing, that this reverential treatment of the King's name is the more needful to be enforced, since in a great country like ours, and according to the course of society in ordinary times, it is really almost the only way, besides intercession, public and private, whereby we may exercise and cherish the feeling of loyalty, completely separated as we are from the person of the King. I say, " in ordinary times :" for at present, unhappily, there is but too distinct a call on every Christian here, for the direct exercise of loyalty, in discouraging in- trusion on the plain rights of our Sovereign, more CHURCH AND STATE. 161 or less openly menaced in so many quarters. But on this painful topic no more shall be added than the simple expression of an earnest wish, that all who are any way engaged in that cause may remember that it is a sacred cause, the cause of God ; as being that of him who is in one sense Chief Minister over this part of His Church. Pity that so many should take it up as a mere struggle for just rights, an effort to preserve liberty and property, or any thing else which the world values. It is all that, and much more : and surely we must beware, lest by our unworthy and inadequate notions we forfeit the blessing otherwise sure to attend on it, whether visibly triumphant or no. But in thus urging loyalty to Christian kings on the ground of their being appointed agents in the Church system, are we not, it may be asked, open- ing a door to disloyalty, first in the case of unbe- lieving or heretical governors, and next> if any calling themselves Churchmen take part with the world in oppressing the Church, and trampling on her fundamental principles ? Are we not sanction- ing what is commonly accounted one of the worst errors of Rome, the notion that there is a visible Church authority above the civil power, entitled in certain cases to dispense with the subjects' obedience ? This may be imagined, but the contrary to all this is the fact. So far from furnishing an incite- ment to impatience and rebellion, there is no such M 162 CHURCH AND STATE. security for quiet and Christian submission even to abused authority, as a sense of that authority proceeding from God, and forming a part of His great everlasting plan : nothing which so reconciles the mind to the thought of enduring it for its time, as the knowing it to be, however perverted, a real trust under Him for His Church. The experience of the three first centuries is surely a sufficient proof of this : a proof not to be invalidated by any contradictions or exceptions which may appear among the conflicts of the subsequent ages. It is not to be doubted that even at that time the kings of the earth had received their commission to be nursing fathers of the Church, although, as yet, they despised and rejected it. Accordingly, they were even then to be owned, and they were con- stantly owned, as ministers, XtLrovpyol, of the Great King to Christian people for their good. No personal oppression, no religious persecution, could then tempt Christian subjects to mutiny. The high destinies of the royal office being known beforehand, it was held sacred, as for other bless- ings to which God made it instrumental, so especially for the work's sake which He had decreed it should one day perform. Nor could any unworthiness of the person ever at all desecrate the function, or take away its claim to something like religious reverence. Thus it was before the rulers of the civilized world had generally agreed to acknowledge them- CHURCH AND STATE, 163 selves, in the sense above explained, servants of the Church of God. And thus it will be, we trust, again, should the evil day occur, in which they shall renounce that service, and consent to live, as rulers, without God in the world. Then it will be again seen, by His grace, that true religious loyalty is independent of the worthiness of governors ; and that while the Church ceases not, in her col- lective character, and by her ordained instruments, to reprove, rebuke, exhort even highest earthly potentates, as having a true indefeasible authority towards them, yet Churchmen individually will not dare to meet the abuses of legitimate power by any thing but firm remonstrance and patient suffering, But what will be the result on the loyalty of Christians towards rulers renouncing the Church, supposing the prevalence of that which may be called perhaps without offence the lower view of the connection of Church and State ? If the office of sovereign has nothing in it particularly sacred, what is to secure the allegiance of Churchmen to it, should it happen at any time or place to be turned against the privileges and interests of the Church ? Will not men presently begin to talk of obedience and protection being reciprocal ; of an ecclesiastical expediency, paramount to all alle- giance ; of excusable resistance, forfeiture, and virtual abdication ? Whereas no calculations of what may seem momentarily expedient even for the best of causes, no, nor yet " oppression, which M2 164 CHURCH AND STATE. maketh even a wise man mad/' will ever move a true consistent Churchman to rebellion, any more than the personal errors of some prelates would lead him to renounce Apostolical authority. Thus on the simple principle of the civil ma- gistrate being by God's ordinance an agent in the great Church system, and so far a sacred person, it would seem that all the duties of loyalty on the part of individuals are sufficiently provided for : and strengthened moreover by a sanction, such as nothing at all, but that kind of heavenly inter- position, could have afforded. And here perhaps, naturally, our deductions from the Prophet's principle of regal power would close : the duty of governors, to the consideration of which in the next place it would of course lead us, not being a very proper subject for discussion on the part of mere subjects. But we of this country are, by God's providence, so situated, that more or less of regal and public duties have (if one may say so) devolved on us generally. By the constitution of our country, we are almost all of us, in some slight measure at least, responsible for the acts of that country. Not one so insignificant but he has his share in forming what is called public opinion ; not one of us there- fore but has reason to apprehend, that he will have his share of account to give hereafter, for any great national sin or neglect of the Church, of which in our time our country may have been guilty. CHURCH AND STATE. 165 For this reason, and also with a view to the right direction of our intercessions for our King and country, and moreover because the sentiment of the text more immediately leads the mind in that direction; it may be right in conclusion to take some notice of certain great public questions and du- ties also, which instinctively occur to our thoughts, as being most directly and materially affected by such an intimation of the Divine Will. First, whereas it is held by some that truth of doctrine only, by others that peaceable and moral tendencies only, are to be looked to by the governors of a country, in determining what religion they will encourage, or whether they will encourage any : it seems, that if we would act on this and on other like passages of the Prophets and Apostles, some- thing beyond either truth or good tendency must enter into our consideration. We must look to the whole system of the Church as it was ordained from the beginning ; to its external and visible, as well as to its internal parts, its government and Sacraments, as well as its doctrine and morals. The whole system (I mean of course in all im- portant points) is the rule to be established, as nearly as circumstances allow. Otherwise, instead of foster-fathers, entrusted to train the Church's children according to the Church's own princi- ples, we constitute ourselves judges, governors, and directors, for the training and reforming the Church herself. So doing, how acute soever our 166 CHURCH AND STATE. calculations, and benevolent our plans for our fellow-men, we cannot with any shew of reason pretend to that highest honour, of being God's fellow-labourers, in building up that holy house- hold, of which Jesus Christ is the Head Corner Stone. For this reason, though one would speak ten- derly of many of those bodies which have thought themselves excused in dispensing with the holy Apostolical Succession in their ministry, yet surely it is most unwise, and I will add most unkind, to speak of those bodies as if they could be sure of a full inheritance of sacramental grace ; or as though any state were free by God's word to choose be- tween their form, and that of the Apostles : modes of speaking, which can never be justified by Scrip- ture, and which are clearly against the whole stream and current of Antiquity. And should that turn out true, which experience seems daily to indicate ; that this same slighted succession is the fore-appointed safeguard of the integrity of our Lord's holy Sacraments, and that again of the integrity of His fundamental doctrines ; much indeed will they have to answer for, who so disparage it, whether out of a false charity, or merely in a loose unguarded way of discourse. And this is a very practical matter. Conversations requiring the above caution are continually oc- curring : and opportunities arise oftener than might be wished, of according or denying one's sanction CHURCH AND STATE. 167 to laxer systems, by actual religious communion, or refusal to communicate, with their followers. With regard to another great point on which discussions are continually arising; the view which a Christian commonwealth ought to take of the endowments of the Church : I could almost be content with a fair opponent to try the whole issue by appeal to this single verse ; " Kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers." Governments then are put in trust by Almighty God with the office of cherishing the children of the Church, as such : and it is not the duty or the custom of faithful nurses to deal out grudgingly the least that will support the infant. Their charge is too tender and precious to be set aside for any inconvenience : it must be attended to at all events, whatever else appear to be neg- lected. Again, the office of rulers is a XtLrovpyia, an honourable public burthen : they are not therefore justified in seeking out ways to serve God which will cost them nothing. Such was the noble sentiment of King David ; what a contrast does it make with those, which seem now to be avowed as the standing principles of most of the governments called free in Christendom! Does not the comparison fear- fully convict this generation, of having quite lost the likeness of the man after God's own heart ? As to the amount of the sacred endowment : tithe among Christians was no doubt given on a 168 CHURCH AND STATE. principle of generous piety. Nature teaches, and Scripture encourages, the honouring Almighty God with the choice of our substance ; and He Himself, both before and after Moses, graciously approved the Tenth as a fit proportion. In days when men served God on Church principles, and not on prin- ciples of their own invention, the intimations of Scripture on this point were held sufficient. Signs were then given, that He would approve the gift of one Tenth ; and with the Tenth accordingly He was honoured over the greater part of the Christian world. What things have come to now, we see : but we see not yet half the fatal result. In the mean time it is rather saddening to observe, that the defenders of the Church in resisting her spoilers are reduced to dwell on nothing so much as the danger of unsettling the rights of property : as if there were no such thing as sacrilege, no mention in Scripture of robbing God, no specification of tithes and offerings as the subject of such robbery, no curse on that whole nation, which shall ever be accessory to the like proceedings. After all allow- ance made for the necessity of meeting other people's prejudices, our tone would not surely be so lowered, we should not so entirely wave the point of Church property being the property of God, if we had not now of a long time been used to take a low tone about the Church herself, and to think little of God's presence within her, and of the way in which He is graciously pleased to CHURCH AND STATE. 169 identify, if I may so speak, His interests with hers. The same studious lowering of tones and views is observable in regard of another analogous and most material part of the holy system of the Church : the observance of the Lord's Day. The Church's provision for her little ones, grounded on the word of God, is one tenth of our sub- stance, and one seventh of our time : and it is the business of those entrusted to nurse them, the Christian legislators and magistrates of every country, to guard as much as possible against their being defrauded of either privilege, the latter more especially, since God's Providence has more expressly called attention to it, by the mention made of it in the Decalogue. But there are some who would set the State above the Church, that is, Earth above Heaven, in this respect also, that they would denounce it as tyrannical, were a Christian government to interfere with the pro- faners of the holy day, even in the mildest way of protection for those who wish to keep it. And so far is the Church system forgotten, that others, who feel the sanctity of the subject, are fain to rest their argument on the sanctions of the elder covenant, in a manner which themselves would be the first to denounce on many other topics which might be mentioned. Whereas, would they consent to accept the Church's authority, as a sufficient warrant for the difference between that and all 170 CHURCH AND STATE. other days,, and to regard Christian governments as appointed Church guardians over the weaker and more helpless sort especially, not in respect of this only, but of all other Christian privileges ; they might not indeed meet with more success in their well-meant efforts,, than they do at present, but they would at least bear a consistent and valuable testimony to sound principles in a corrupt and presumptuous age. For indeed this matter of the Lord's Day is only one point of many in the great trust of educating, in the largest sense, the children of the Church ; which trust includes the greater and weightier part of the duty of her nursing fathers. Speaking of education as Christians, of course we understand not the management of children only, but of such as are children by station, under- standing, or prejudice : and not merely regular instruction in Church doctrine, but regular com- munication also of Church privileges : that being in a manner true of the law of every Christian land, which the Apostle affirms concerning the Law of Moses : it is in the Divine purpose, and ought to be in effect, a kind of " schoolmaster to bring us to Christ." Thus, the idea of the State as a foster-parent will illustrate those delicate ques- tions, how far error is to be tolerated : when and in what measure even penal interference may be a Christian duty, interference, I mean, not of course with opinions, but with the reckless propagation CHURCH AND STATE. 171 of them : what outward tests or sanctions may be wisely adopted or relaxed from time to time, for the encouragement of holy truth, and discounte- nance of antichristian error. All these points are included in the analogy drawn by the Scriptures from nursing parents. And the passage in Isaiah suggests the thought, whether Christian sovereigns be not appointed agents especially in the work of propagating the Gospel where yet unknown. " I will lift up Mine Hand to the Gentiles, and set up My standard to the people ; and they shall bring thy sons in their arms, and thy daughters shall be carried upon their shoulders ; and kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers." Surely it is a mean and low ambition in these statesmen of our time, which casts aside these promises, and thinks it more noble to be free from a Church, which would employ them in such a career as this. In sum : if there be one thing more than another utterly condemned and shut out by that principle of Church and State connection, which Moses and the Prophets have delivered, and on which the Church in her better days acted, the principle of the State being bound to foster the Church's off- spring : it is the disposition to insolent indiffer- ence, and leaving things to take care of themselves. And is not this the very disposition which bears sway at present in what is called enlightened society ? Men seern inclined to declare with one voice, We 172 CHURCH AND STATE. may for such and such reasons for a while patronize this or that Church : but we will not serve the Church ; we will not believe that there is a great universal plan, established by our Lord after His Resurrection, and now abiding in the world : we will not submit ourselves to any such claim. In reply, we can only remind them, that the following words are the words of God, and were undoubtedly addressed to the Church, whose au- thority they reject : " The nation and kingdom which will not serve thee shall perish, yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted." May God withhold the judgment from our country, and enable us to do something, each in his own sphere, however humble, towards that nursing care of Christ's little ones, which only can give a chance of averting it ! SERMON VIII. a PRIMITIVE TRADITION RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 2 TIM. i. 14. That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us. WHATEVER men may severally anticipate con- cerning the final issue of the many anxious dis- cussions which at present occupy the Catholic Church in England, all, I suppose, must feel that for the time they occasion a great perplexity and doubtfulness of mind. We are beset on every side (the clergy more especially) with conflicting diffi- culties, and temptations to unworthy compromise. That man must be either very confident in the accuracy of his own views, or very highly favoured in respect of clearness of judgment, or very suc- cessful in keeping himself out of the way of all controversy, who has not repeatedly found himself a Preached in the Cathedral Church of Winchester, at the Visitation of the Worshipful and Reverend William Dealtry, D.D, Chancellor of the Diocese, Septemher 27, 1836. 174 PRIMITIVE TRADITION at a loss, within the last seven years, on such points as the following: What are the limits of the civil power in ecclesiastical matters, and how far we may venture in the way of submission with- out sacrifice of Church principle : how the freedom of the Anglican Church may be vindicated against the exorbitant claims of Rome, and yet no dis- paragement ensue of the authority inherent in the Catholic Apostolical Church: again, how the method of voluntary combination, so generally resorted to in our days for important ecclesiastical objects, may be reconciled with entire deference to episcopal prerogative ; how Christ's ministers may " study to be quiet," and yet do their duty as watchmen, and not let their people slumber in the midst of danger ; and how they may best unite unwearied meekness in judging, and active Chris- tian love, with strict reserve and timely censure towards every one that walketh disorderly. The time was, not long since, when many of these points appeared to most of us as mere historical curiosities. We felt, perhaps, that they were, abstractedly, of grave importance, but we thanked God that our lot was cast in times which required not of us, as pastors and stewards in Christ's service, any distinct consideration and settled views concerning them. Now things are different : the course of God's providence has permitted the enemies or prompted the defenders of the Church to lay bare her very foundations ; and it has be- RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 175 come imperative on us all, in discharge of our Ordination vows, to make up our minds as well as we can, and endeavour to see our own way, on points which we should gladly, if we might, have taken on trust. It cannot be safe to shrink from this duty, and say, as many seem inclined to do, that we could bear persecution itself better than the perplexity of considering such things, or the responsibility of deciding for ourselves, and agitating others, con- cerning them. We have put our hand to the plough, and we must not we dare not look back. It is too late for sworn and ordained Priests and Ministers in the Church of God to dream of draw- ing back from responsibility. The nature of the case contradicts the very thought. For what re- \ sponsibility can be more fearful than his, who indo- lently and unthinkingly gives his assent to changes, which, for aught he knows, may prove not only ruinous in the event, but in theory and principle also opposed to the truths and ordinances where- with Christ has put him in trust ? Dismissing, therefore, as a snare of our great enemy, the false comfort which many of us, perhaps, are too much inclined to take to ourselves, from a notion that by not interfering we keep ourselves irresponsible, let us see whether the unprejudiced study of those parts of Scripture, which are obviously best suited to our case, may not supply us with a better and more genuine comfort, by furnishing some one clear 176 PRIMITIVE TRADITION and unquestionable rule, which may go a good way in guiding us rightly, independent of all results : shewing us where our chief responsibility lies, and to which, among interests and duties appa- rently conflicting, we are bound always to give the preference. It is natural, in such an inquiry, to turn imme- diately to the two Epistles to Timothy, especially the last. For undoubtedly it must have been to that holy Bishop a time of very great perplexity, when his guide and father in the faith was on the eve of departing from him: the heretics also, as appears from many passages, already beginning to infest the Asiatic Churches, according to St. Paul's own prophecy. It appears from the opening of the second Epistle, that when all doubt was taken away as to St. Paul's approaching martyrdom, his affectionate disciple was in danger of being over- whelmed by his sorrow for so great a loss, joined to his sense of the heavy burden which would be laid on himself, now left comparatively alone. To these two feelings in the breast of Timothy, the Apostle in his farewell letter addresses himself: re- membering, as he says b , the tears which Timothy had shed, perhaps when they had last parted from each other, and longing the more for the satis- faction of seeing him again. In the mean time, there are two words, which he seems studiously to repeat over and over, that he may leave them " Ch. iii. 4. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 177 sounding,, as it were, in his disciple's ears, for remembrancers of the two duties most pressing at the moment : KAKOIIA0H2ON, and IIAPAKATA- HKH : " endure hardness," and " keep that com- mitted to thy charge." First, with reference to the dejection of mind, by which Timothy was then suffering: "endure hardness/' says the Apostle , " as a good soldier of Jesus Christ ;" " endure d affliction, make full proof of thy ministry ;" " be thou e partaker of the afflic- tion of the Gospel, according to the power of God." The drift of all which warnings is the same as where he reminds the Thessalonians f , "When we were with you, we told you that we should suffer tribulation ; even as it came to pass, and ye know." Affliction, hardness, trial, tribulation, is the very atmosphere of the Gospel ministry : we never had cause to expect any thing else. " Do not, therefore," (so the Apostle implies,) " do not shrink thus over-tenderly from the thought of losing me, which, you now see, comes into your ordained portion of trouble." " Be not ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me His prisoner ;" do not carry your affectionate regret so far as almost to cause an appearance of defective faith. Do not take it to heart so very bitterly, as if you in some sort regretted your Christian engagement, finding so much to be borne beyond your expect- ation ; as if you were sorry that you had put so Ch. ii. 3. d Ch. iv. 5. Ch. i. 8. f 1 Thess. iii. 4. N 178 PRIMITIVE TRADITION much confidence in me. But, instead of vain regret, take comfort in doing your duty ; resort to that fountain of supernatural grace which was opened for you when you were consecrated to be an Apostle. " Remember that thou stir up the gift of God which is in thee by the imposition of my hands. For the Spirit which we both of us then received was not a spirit of fear," of unworthy sadness and cowardice ; excessive, unreasonable dejection can be no fruit of it. Such were the tender expostulations and chidings of St. Paul, well beseeming the kindest and most thoughtful of parents recalling his own son in the faith to a manly firmness. Then, in the temper of a noble and true soldier, he propounds his own ex- ample, teaches his younger comrade the way of con- solation which he found most effectual for himself. " Because I am ordained a herald and apostle and teacher, I suffer these things : but I am not ashamed, for I know in Whom I have believed, and am persuaded that He is able to keep that which I have committed unto Him against that day." And elsewhere g , " I suffer evil, as a male- factor, even unto bonds, but the word of God is not bound." What can be more animating, what more affecting, than to witness a person like St. Paul, full of conscious energy, power, and useful- ness, thus devoutly reconciling himself to that which, humanly speaking, would have seemed the * Ch. ii. 9. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 179 most untimely interruption of his labours ? It is \ clear, I think, that even St. Paul found this a severe struggle ; but he cheers himself, as in his former imprisonment ; when he wrote to the Philippians, that the taunts of his enemies on his confinement had turned out rather to the furtherance of the Gospel, causing his bonds in Christ to be spoken of in the palace of the Caesars, and in all places : so that even those who in speaking of his sufferings meant nothing but envy and strife, did in a manner " preach Christ ;" make His Gospel known, and draw popular attention to His Name h . Such I take to be the true meaning of that often alleged text ; far from conveying the encouragement, which some think they find in it, to irregular and schis- matical efforts, but fraught with abundant con- solation for those, who being anxious for the Church in evil times, feel themselves precluded from active exertions on her behalf. They can always say to themselves, " The Word of God is not bound : He can make even envy and strife involuntary heralds of His cause." Their fidelity in acting while they could is rewarded with the assurance of a strong faith, that when their work is over, God's eternal and glorious work is still in progress, although they cannot see how. But we dare not take this comfort to ourselves, we dare not, in those instances where we find the Church bound and fettered, mitigate our h See Note (A) at the end of ihis Sermon. N2 180 PRIMITIVE TRADITION regret by exulting remembrance of the expansive inherent force of divine truth, except we be really, in some tolerable measure, doing our best for her, so far as we are at liberty. The sense of our own responsibility, and of our faithfulness to it, must lie at the root of all true and solid consolation. To this, therefore, as the one thing needful, both for the cause and for himself, the Apostle most emphatically bespeaks his disciple's attention. He loses no opportunity of reminding him of the TrapaKaTaOrjKri, the charge, trust, deposit, which had been left jointly in both their hands, and in the hands of all commissioned as they were. Observe how naturally, with what dexterity of affection, he passes from the mention of his own trust to that of the same trust as committed to Timothy : " I am not ashamed, for I know in Whom I have believed, and am persuaded that He is able to keep my deposit, rrjv TrapaKaraOrjKrjv JULOV, against that day. Hold fast the form," or, " abide by the pattern or standard, of wholesome words which thou hast heard from me, by faith and love which is in Christ Jesus. That good thing committed unto thee" (literally, the good and noble deposit) " keep, by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us." Surely these are words in which we ourselves are concerned, as deeply as he was, to whom they were first written. We are so far in Timothy's case, that we are full of sorrow and perplexity at the condition in which we find the Church and RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 181 Body of Christ Jesus : we would fain lay hold of \ Timothy's and St. Paul's consolation: let us first j see to it, that we neglect not the warning given. \ To the companion of Apostles that warning was plain and simple. The duty imposed on him, , paramount to all others, was simply to keep safe and entire a certain trust committed to his charge ; to that one vital object all considerations of present expediency, temporal comfort, visible, apparent edification, were to give way. What that treasure was, Timothy could not be ignorant ; nor yet could he be doubtful as to the celestial aid, by which, if not wanting to himself, he would surely be enabled to preserve it. But in both respects some consideration is requisite, before we of this day can fully apply the case to ourselves. It is not obvious at first sight, what this trust or trea- sure was : nor (of course) whether we are partakers of it : and even supposing those points settled, there might still remain a doubt, whether we have the same help for the faithful discharge of our trust, the Holy Ghost dwelling in us. The con- sideration of these points in their order may not unfitly employ us on the present occasion. 1. And, first, as to the exact notion which we are to attach to the word TrapaKaraOrjKr]^ " trust or deposit," in this place : I observe, that the very use of so general a word with the article implies that it had been by that time received among Christians as a term (if one may so speak) of their 128 PRIMITIVE TRADITION t own, a part of the vocabulary of the holy Catholic Church. A diligent eye may detect, in St. Paul's Epistles, many traces of the like use of language : current sayings, or senses of words, or formulae, which the Apostle only just alludes to, as well known to all his readers. For instance, the ex- pression, " This is a faithful saying," which occurs repeatedly in these latter Epistles, indicates, in all probability, so many Christian proverbs, familiar in the mouths of that generation of believers. Thus in the first Epistle to Timothy, we have, " This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all men to be received, that ' Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners 1 :' This is a faithful saying, ' If a man desire the office of a Bishop, he desireth a good work k ;' This is a faithful saying, ' That therefore we both labour, and suffer reproof, because we trust in the living God, Who is the Saviour of all men, especially of them that believe V " In the second Epistle m , " It is a faithful saying, ' If we be dead with Him, we shall also live with Him ; if we suffer, we shall also reign with Him ; if we deny Him, He also will deny us/" And to Titus, after a brief summary of the Gospel way of salvation, which by the exact rhythm and order of its mem- bers might almost appear to be part of a primitive hymn n , St. Paul adds the same clause, " Faithful is the saying." From all which I argue, that there ' Ch. i. 15. k Ch. iii. 1. ' Ch. iv. 9, 10. m Ch. ii. 11. n See Note (B) at the end of this Sermon. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 183 was a certain set of " sayings" currenf among the Christians of that time, to which any allusion or appeal, however brief, would be presently under- stood. Nor will it be hard to find examples of single words, which had evidently acquired by that time a Christian sense ; so that, even when usecf absolutely, they could only be taken by Christians in a particular relation : such words, I mean, as TO jjivcrTrjpLov, for " the scheme of supernatural truth revealed in the Gospel, and more especially in the doctrine of our Lord's incarnation ;" o e%ffpef) for " the evil spirit ;" 77 oSos, for " the profession of Christianity." These, and other examples which might be mentioned, make it surely not incredible, that rj TrapaK.aTaOrjK'Yji " the deposit, trust, or charge," conveyed to Christian ears in those days a peculiar and definite, I had almost said, a technical, meaning. Now both this word and its kindred term, 77 tvroXrj, " the commandment," are mentioned in connection with errors to be avoided in doctrine. Thus, Timothy is warned" to 7rois TOLS (6e\ovv TJV 17 nicrris' TTOO-O) /xaXXoj/ r)p.els Kiv^vveixro/jieVt el ebrXaJs KOI a>s erv^e TO TOV 0eov Xoyia p.eTadwo'op.ev ftfftrjXois Kal dvaiois dv8pd c. 36. 198 PRIMITIVE TRADITION towards the end of the second century, the fact had been universally recognised, and the maxim thoroughly grounded and incorporated into the system of the Catholic Church k . Reserving thus the claim of Scripture to be sole and paramount as a rule of faith, we may now, I think, venture to assume, from the nature of the case, the incidental testimony of Scripture, and the direct assertions of the Fathers, that it was an unwritten system which the holy writers spoke of, when they so earnestly recommended the deposit, the commandment, the word heard from the begin- ning, to the reverential care both of pastors and of all Christian people. Will it be said, " This is no concern of ours ; it may be true in fact, but it yields no practical result ; the traditionary system, whatever it was, having long ago passed away, except so far as it has been preserved in inspired writings ?" This may be stated, and often is so, but can hardly be proved. For in the first place, as long as it is only doubt- ful whether any statement or precept is part of the Apostolic system or no, so long a mind imbued with true devotion will treat that statement or pre- cept with reverence, will not rudely reject or scorn it, lest he refuse to entertain an angel unawares. So long the mere fact of its not being contained in k See note (F) at the end of this Sermon. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 199 Scripture cannot be felt as a justification for casting it aside, any more than we should venture to dis- parage it on account of its not being revealed in any particular book of Scripture, which we might happen to value above the rest. Although not in Scripture, it may yet be a part of their rule, con- cerning whom the Son of God has declared, " He that heareth you, heareth Me : and he that despiseth you, despiseth Me." But in truth it may be proved to the satisfaction of any reasonable mind, that not a few fragments yet remain, very precious and sacred fragments, of the unwritten teaching of the first age of the Church. The paramount authority, for example, of the successors of the Apostles in Church government ; the threefold Order established from the beginning ; the virtue of the blessed Eucharist as a commemo- rative sacrifice ; infant Baptism ; and above all, the Catholic doctrine of the Most Holy Trinity, as contained in the Nicene Creed. All these, however surely confirmed from Scripture, are yet ascertain- able parts of the primitive, unwritten system, of which we yet enjoy the benefit. If any one ask, how we ascertain them ; we answer, by application of the well-known rule, Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus : Antiquity, Universality, Catho- licity : tests similar to those which jurists are used to apply to the common or unwritten laws of any realm. If a maxim or custom can be traced back to a time whereof the memory of man runneth not 200 PRIMITIVE TRADITION to the contrary ; if it pervade all the different courts, established in different provinces for the administration of justice ; and, thirdly, if it be generally acknowledged in such sort, that contrary decisions have been disallowed and held invalid : then, whatever the exceptions to it may be, it is presumed to be part and parcel of our common law. On principles exactly analogous, the Church practice and rules above mentioned, and several others, ought, we contend, apart from all Scripture evidence, to be received as traditionary or common laws ecclesiastical. They who contend that the very notion of such tradition is a mere dream and extra- vagance ; who plead against it the uncertainty of history, the loss or probable corruption of records, the exceptions, deviations, interruptions which have occurred through the temporary prevalence of tyranny, heresy, or schism ; must, if they would be consistent, deny the validity of the most important portion of the laws of this and of most other old countries. It is not, therefore, antecedently impossible that a system of tradition, subsidiary to the Scriptures, might yet exist in the commonwealth or city of God. The rest is matter of investigation in each case, whether any given rule, interpretation, or custom, be traditionary in the required sense. But it will not be going too far into particulars, and may help to the understanding and application of the whole argument, if I point out three distinct RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 201 fields of Christian knowledge,, in neither of which can we advance satisfactorily or safely without constant appeal to tradition, such as has been described. The first is, the System and Arrangement of fun- damental Articles, so far as they have come down to us systematic and arranged. We, that is all of the Anglican Church who have had any regular training in theology, are so early taught to trace the Creed in the Scriptures, and to refer at once certain portions of both Testaments to certain high mysteries of the Catholic faith, that it commonly appears to ourselves as though we had learned those mysteries directly from the Scriptures. But there are few, surely, who on careful recollection would not be compelled to acknowledge that the Creed, or some corresponding catechetical instruc- tion, had prepossessed them with these truths, before ever they thought of proving them from Holy Writ. I need hardly remind you of the unquestioned historical fact, that the very Nicene Creed itself, to which perhaps of all formulce we are most indebted for our sound belief in the proper divinity of the Son of God even this Creed had/ its origin, not from Scripture, but from tradition. The three hundred Bishops who joined in its pro- mulgation did not profess to have collected it out of the Bible, but simply to express the faith which each of them had found in the Church which he represented, received by tradition from the Apo- 20*2 PRIMITIVE TRADITION sties 1 . Nor is this any disparagement to Scripture, nor need it excite any alarm for the great funda- mental verity itself, which the Creed was meant to assert ; any more than it would disparage the works of God, or shake the foundation of our faith in natural religion, were one to affirm that the power and Godhead of the Creator, although unquestionably proveable from the things which are made, would yet have remained unknown to the mass of mankind, but for primitive tradition, or subsequent revelation of it. The second great subject, on which most of us are unconsciously indebted to the ancient Catholic tradition, is the Interpretation of Scripture, espe- cially those parts of which less obviously relate to the mysteries of the Gospel. Catholic tradition bears upon Scripture interpretation, not only indi- rectly, by supplying, as just now stated, certain great landmarks of apostolical doctrine, conform- ably to which the written statements are all to be interpreted ; but also, in numerous cases, directly ; setting the Church's seal, as it were, upon one among many possible expositions of particular pas- sages. For example : how else could we know, with tolerable certainty, that Melchisedek's feast is a type of the blessed eucharist m ? or that the 1 See note (G) at the end of this Sermon. m For this, see S.Cyprian, Ep. 63. p. 149. ed. Fell; S. Au- gustin, de Civ. Dei, xviii. 20; S. Jerome, Ep. ad Marcellam, t. i. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 103 book of Canticles is an allegory, representing the mystical union betwixt Christ and his Church"? or that Wisdom, in the book of Proverbs, is a Name of the second Person in the Most Holy Trinity ? All which interpretations, the moment they are heard, approve themselves to an unpre- judiced mind, and must in all likelihood have come spontaneously into many readers' thoughts. But it may be questioned whether we could ever have arrived at more than a plausible conjecture re- garding them, but for the constant agreement of the early Church, taking notice every where, in these and the like instances, of the manner in which the Old Testament was divinely accommodated to the wonders of Christ's religion. The third great field of apostolical tradition lies among practical matters, the Discipline, Formula- ries, and Rites of the Church of Christ : in regard p. 123. ed. Frob. Basil. These with the distinct acknowledgment in the ancient Roman Liturgy, may perhaps be considered sufficient to represent the sense of the Western Churches. Among the Greeks, S. Chrysostom (on Gen. xiv.) clearly implies the same construction. But the reserve maintained by them on all liturgical subjects may account for their comparative silence on this point, even supposing them to have received the same interpretation. n In this I believe all the Fathers who quote that divine Book (and most of them do so often) are agreed. The disputes on the text, Proverbs viii. 22, at the Nicene Council, are sufficient to prove agreement on this point. It is well known that the Arians alleged it, as it stands in the Septuagint, (6 Kvpws KTLO- /Me,) as a proof of the Son's inferiority. The Catholics never disputed the application of the text to our Lord, but denied the deduction from it. 204 PRIMITIVE TRADITION of which, reason tells us that the Church Apo- stolical must here have had some method and system ; yet it is evident to the very eye that the New Testament exhibits no such system in form, but only fragments and other indications of one in full operation at the time, and well known to those for whom the Apostles were writing. These frag- ments being found to coincide with similar but more copious indications in later Church records ; consideration also being had of the religious reve- rence wherewith in those ages every thing primi- tive was regarded, and of the charitable jealousy of the Churches, watching each other for the pur- pose of remonstrating against unwarrantable de- viations ; we need not fear to accept in its fulness, on all such matters, the well-known rule to St. Augustin, which I give in the words of Hooker p : " Whatsoever positive order the whole Church every where doth observe, the same it must needs have received from the very Apostles themselves ; unless, perhaps, some general council were the authors of it." In this kind no one at all versed in Church history can be at a loss for examples of the benefit which the present Church derives from the chain of primitive tradition. Without its aid, humanly speaking, I do not see how we could now retain either real inward communion with our Lord through His Apostles, or the very P E. P. vii. v. 3. from Aug. Ep. 108. t. ii. 125. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTUhE. 205 outward face of God's Church and kingdom among us. Not to dwell on disputable cases: how, but by the tradition and practice of the early Church, can we demonstrate the observance of Sunday as the holiest day, or the permanent separation of the clergy from the people as a distinct order ? or where, except in the primitive Liturgies, a main branch of that tradition, can we find assurance that in the Holy Eucharist we consecrate as the Apostles did, and, consequently, that the cup of blessing which we bless is the communion of the Blood of Christ, and the bread which we break the communion of the Body of Christ ? Whether, then, we look to Discipline, to Inter- pretation, or to Doctrine, every way we see reason to be thankful for many fragments of apostolical practice and teaching, most needful to guide us in the right use of Holy Scripture. So it is, however, that either fr6m impatience of authority, or dislike of trouble, or excessive dread of Romish error, tradition has become to most of us an unpalatable word, and we love not to allow that in any sense we rest our faith and practice upon it. And, as commonly happens when the mind is first made up, and reasons are to be found afterwards, objections the most contradictory are brought to justify this our determined dis- regard of antiquity. Sometimes it is urged that the matters involved are so many, so intricate and 206 PRIMITIVE TRADITION various, and demand such minute research, that it is out of the question bringing them within the reach of the great body of the clergy, however learned; sometimes, on the contrary, it is main- tained, that the points agreed on in the whole ancient Church are obviously so few, there have been such constant discussions and waverings of opinion, that after all there is no such thing as primitive Catholic tradition : what is called such being merely the register of the dictates of that which has proved, on the whole, the strongest and most fashionable party in the Church r . The one statement makes the field so wide, that it is impossible not to lose one's way in it ; the other so contracted, that occupying it is no advantage. It is obvious that both objections cannot stand together ; and as might be expected, the truth lies between the two. On the one hand, we are not to imagine that every usage which has pre- vailed in any part of the Church, every opinion which has been upheld even among orthodox Fathers, claims to have been part of the system of the Apostles. On the other hand, we cannot surely deny such claim to those rules, in which all primitive Councils are uniform, those rites and formularies which are found in all primitive Litur- gies, and those interpretations and principles of interpretation in which all orthodox Fathers agree ; r See Note (H) at the end of this Sermon. RECOGNISED IN- HOLY SCRIPTURE. 207 more especially when they produce them as undoubted and authoritative. Now the genuine canons of the primitive Councils, and the genuine fragments of the primitive Liturgies, are reducible into a small space ; even although we go so low down in both as the division of the Eastern and Western Churches, including the six first Councils general, and excluding image-worship and similar corruptions by authority. As far, therefore, as the Councils and Liturgies are concerned, tracing the remnant of apostolical tradition need not prove such a very overwhelming task. To establish con- sent among the Fathers is, doubtless, a far more laborious process ; easiest, however, where it is most desirable, namely, in the great points of faith and worship, as recurring continually, and implied in all other discussions. What remains is chiefly interpretation of Scripture ; a precious, inexhausti- ble mine of primitive knowledge, to such as have the zeal to explore it, but not essential to the fixing of the main outlines. Leaving out, for the present, all such incidental discussions, and confining our view to that which touches the foundation, we shall find that the matters are neither few nor unim- portant, which are settled by traditionary evidence within reach of common students. Were they much fewer than they are, and less important, still, as unquestionable relics of the Apostles, a devout and thoughtful mind would prize them for their 208 PRIMITIVE TRADITION authors' sake, and for the sake of the lost treasure, whereof they are portions. To forget and dis- parage them, would be a hard and unnatural thing, like coldly refusing due reverence to the dead. As it is, by the gracious Providence of Almighty God, the points of Catholic consent known by tradition constitute the knots and ties of the whole system ; being such as these : the canon of Scripture, the full doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation, the oblation and consecration of the Eucharist, the apostolical succession ; truths and orders soon enumerated, but such as to extend in vital efficacy through every part of the great scheme of the Church. What, then, if the Church in our time, for the sins of Christians, should have lost more or less of " that good thing," the perfect apostolical body of government, doctrine, and sacramental grace, committed to St. Paul first, and by him to Timothy ? It is not the less our duty, and by God's grace we will regard it as our high privilege, to keep unwearied watch over what remains, and to preserve it, " by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us." 3. These concluding words, while they supply an additional reason for extreme jealousy of our precious apostolical relics, open to us the appointed way of guarding what remains, and if one might be so happy, of recovering more : a way not our RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 209 own, but strictly and properly supernatural. And thus we are conducted to the final point of our enquiry, Whether we, the existing Ministers of the Church, have the same grace dwelling in us, by which Timothy was exhorted to maintain his trust. Now certainly the obvious meaning of the text is, that the treasure of sound doctrine was to be guarded by the grace of the Apostolical Succession. For St. Paul speaks of the Holy Ghost dwelling in us; that is, in himself and Timothy: and how it had passed from him to Timothy had been expressed a few verses before ; " I will that thou stir up the grace of God which is in thee by the imposition of my hands." The Church of England, you will remember, supplies full warrant for this interpretation ; by directing the same phrase to be solemnly repeated at the consecration of every Bishop: " Remember that thou stir up the grace of God which is given thee by the imposition of our hands; and also where, in ordaining a Bishop or Presbyter, the solemn words are spoken, " Receive the Holy Ghost." Our Church, therefore, does not teach us to consider the Holy Ghost dwelling in St. Paul and Timothy as properly miraculous, a gift of extraordinary grace ; but as their portion of that Spirit which was to be poured out on all Apostles, and successors of the Apostles, for ever. It was not what is commonly called miraculous ; yet it was altogether supernatural. For no natural or acquired virtue or talent, though it might be 210 PRIMITIVE TRADITION called the gift of the Holy Ghost, would ever be designated as the Holy Ghost Himself abiding in a man. Neither was it the preventing or assisting grace, common to all Christian persons ; for it was given to Timothy in particular by imposition of St. Paul's hands. It could only be, what the Church interprets it, apostolical or episcopal grace. Apostolical, then, or episcopal grace is by God's ordinance the guardian of sound doctrine ; the Spirit abiding in Timothy is to watch incessantly the deposit or trust of divine truth left in his charge ; and where the one, the succession, fails, there, as this verse would lead us to expect, and as all Church history proves, the other, the truth of doctrine, is immediately in imminent jeopardy* Here, then, we seem to have arrived at one cardinal point at least, whereby we may shape our course in times and emergencies more than usually perplexing. We are to look before all things to the integrity of the good deposit, the orthodox faith, the Creed of the Apostolical Church, guaranteed to us by Holy Scripture, and by consent of pure antiquity. Present opportunities of doing good ; external quietness, peace, and order ; a good understanding with the temporal and civil power ; the love and co-operation of those committed to our charge; these, and all other pastoral con- solations, must be given up, though it be with a heavy heart, rather than we should yield one RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. tl I jot or one tittle of the faith once delivered to the Saints. And whereas the dangers to that faith vary according to the differences of times, interests, and opinions ; and sometimes the scriptural, some- times the traditionary safeguards of it appear to be more immediately threatened ; both must be watched with jealous and impartial care, since com- parative neglect of either is sure to be attended with ill consequences to both. Thus the reverence of the Latin Church for tradition, being applied unscrupulously, and without the necessary check from Scripture, to opinions and practices of a date comparatively recent, has led a large portion of Christendom to disuse and contempt, not of Scrip- ture only, but of that real and sure tradition, which they might and ought to have religiously depended upon. On the other hand, is there not reason to fear that the Holy Scriptures themselves are fast losing reverence, through the resolute defiance of tradition, which some affect, in conformity, as they suppose, with the maxim, that the Bible only is the religion of Protestants ? Surely it is no rare nor unnatural result, if such as are trained to this principle, being left, as some one has said, alone with their Bibles 9 , use their supposed liberty of interpretation, first in explaining away the mys- terious meaning, and afterwards in lowering or evading the supernatural authority, of the very 8 Hooker, E. P. Pref. vii. 7. p2 212 PRIMITIVE TRADITION 'Scriptures which at first they deferred to exclu- sively. And no wonder; since among the tradi^ tionary truths which they are taught to undervalue is the canon of Scripture itself, and the principle also, that fundamental articles of belief must be sought for in Scripture. In short, the sacred building is so divinely, though invisibly, cemented, that, for aught we know, it is impossible to remove any portion, either of scriptural or traditionary truth> without weakening the whole arch. We, to whorn the whole is committed, under the most solemn of all pledges, and with the actual gift of the all-sufficient Spirit to aid us in redeeming that pledge ; let us, above all things, beware of the presumption of selecting for ourselves among the truths and laws of the Most High, which we will retain, and ivliich we may venture to dispense with. In the next place, let us beware of novelty : novelty> I mean, as compared with the apostolic age ; not the mere appearance of novelty as com- pared with the current notions of our time. For it is self-evident, that if in any age or country any portion of apostolical truth be lost, whenever it is revived it must for the time look new ; and its main tain ers will have to contend with the preju- dice which constantly waits on the disturbers of things established. Not novelty, therefore, relative to us, but novelty relative to the primitive and original standard, is the thing above all to be deprecated in the whole of theology, by whatever RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 213 plausible air of originality, ingenuity, completeness, it may seem to recommend itself. Observe under what a fearful penalty, in a warn- ing parallel to that of the text, St. Paul, writing to the Thessalonians, discourages every intrusion of speculative doctrine. The apostasy, he tells them, will come ; the wicked one shall be revealed, actuated by Satan to deceive them that perish; " on whom God will send strong delusion, that they may believe a lie." And then he proceeds, " Wherefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our epistle." Is not this equivalent to saying, that whoever is studious of novelty in religion is in a way to take part with Antichrist ; that the only security against him, and the spirit which prepares the way for him, is to hold the apostolical doctrine, whether taught in word or in writing; and to. exclude all additions, however tempting to human ingenuity and love of system, however acutely they may appear to be reasoned out, and to fall in with allowed principles ? Had this rule been faithfully kept, it would have preserved the Church just as effectually from the assertion of transubstantiation on the one hand, as from the denial of Christ's real presence on the other hand. The two errors in the original are perhaps but rationalism in different forms ; endeavours to explain away, and bring nearer to the human intellect, that which had been left thoroughly mysterious both 214 PRIMITIVE TRADITION by Scripture and tradition. They would both turn the attention of men from the real life-giving miracle to mere metaphysical or grammatical sub- tilties, such as our fathers never knew. Observe, again, the phraseology of the Apostle, how it is formed throughout upon the supposition, that in the substance of the faith there is no such thing as improvement, discovery, evolution of new truths ; none of those processes, which are the pride of human reason and knowledge, find any place here. Here the one thing needful is to " retain the mystery of the faith ;" to " abide in the good instruction whereto we have already attained ;" to " teach no other doctrine ;" to be on our guard against those who resist the truth under pretence of " proceeding further," assured that such, although they seem to be " ever learning," shall never be able to " come to the knowledge of the truth ;" they will "proceed" indeed, but it will be from bad to worse*. All these cautions, and others no less fearful, the Holy Spirit has left for our admonition, directed not against any positive wrong opinion, but in general against the fatal error of treating theology like any human science, as a subject in which every succeeding age might be expected to advance on the former u . Nor is the warning less important, nor the ap- * 1 Tim. iii. 9; iv. 6 ; i. 3. 2 Tim. iii. 7, 9, 13. eVt TO xelpoi/, ir\av(H)VTs KCU TrAai/co/^ei/ot. u See note (I) at the end of this Sermon. RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 215 plication to our times less certain, where Timothy is enjoined* to " keep that committed to his charge, turning away from profane, empty verbal discussions and oppositions of knowledge falsely so called." The allusion was probably in the first instance to the low-minded empirical system of the Gnostics. But the words are not much less appropriate to that which may be called the Nominalism of our days ; I mean, the habit of resolving the high mysteries of the faith into mere circumstances of language, methods of speaking adapted to our weak understanding, but with no real counterpart in the nature of things. Whoever takes this line must needs hold the tradition of antiquity cheap, since it is based altogether on the supposition which he rejects as unphilosophical. Thus slighting tradition, and explaining away Scripture, there is no saying what pernicious heresy such a theorist may not fall into, if not happily guarded against himself by feelings and prejudices more reasonable than all his reasoning. Mean time the warning of Scripture is express : that they who " profess" such things may be ex- pected to " err concerning the faith." And it is plain, that if at any time either the high places of the Church, or the schools of theological knowledge, should be left in such keeping, the guardians of the good deposit would be bound to direct especial attention that way, and not permit x 1 Tim. vi. 20,21. 216 PRIMITIVE TRADITION things to pass away, as in a dream, before men are aware. This leads directly to the recollection of a third danger, to which the Church seems especially exposed at this moment ; I mean, that which is commonly entitled Erastianism ; the Church be- traying to the civil power more or less of the good deposit, which our Lord had put exclusively into her hands. This is a form of compromise with the world, for which no occasion was given by the circumstances of the Apostles : a trial peculiar to times like ours, when the governors of the world profess to have become the servants of our Lord and of His Christ. We cannot therefore look in the New Testament for literal instruction how to behave with regard to this delicate and dangerous part of our duty. The Gospel affording no ex- press rules or precedents, we are thrown first upon the many analogous cases which the inspired records of the Jewish history supply ; and then upon the conduct and determinations of the Catholic Church, in those centuries of her esta- blishment during which the primitive system existed in something like integrity, to guide her demeanour in her altered condition. Yet, un- doubtedly, the general rule, Keep the deposit, affects our relations to the civil authorities more immediately than persons unversed in Church matters might imagine. If we are to understand by " the deposit," the faith once for all committed RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. 217 to Christians ; and if the Apostolical Succession be the appointed guard of that faith ; and if the charter of the Succession, " As My Father hath sent Me, even so send I you/' convey the power of Church government as well as that of adminis- tering Sacraments ; then every undue sacrifice of the power of Church government to any earthly power is an infringement of the charter, and ren- ders the deposit of the faith less secure. For the sake therefore of the very foundation of sound doctrine, and not only for the sake of peace and order in the Church, ecclesiastical government, as well as the custody of the Sacraments, should be jealously reserved in those hands to which Christ originally entrusted it. Nor do I see how it can be less than a sacred duty, however painful, and to human eyes unavailing, to protest, if we can do no more, against unauthorized intrusions on Church government, as every one will readily allow we ought to protest against unauthorized administra- tion of Sacraments 7 . Such being the object for which we are set in defence, and such the enemies with whom we have to contend ; such also the heavenly Assistant, dwelling in us and fighting on our side ; it cannot be hard to perceive with what dispositions we ought to address ourselves to that holy warfare. It will not do to shrink from responsibility, or y See note (K) at the end of this Sermon. 218 PRIMITIVE TRADITION to be over scrupulous in calculating immediate results. Once let us be reasonably assured that we are in the way of our duty, really keeping the good deposit ; and then, to use the words of the Prophet, we may " set our faces like a flint, and need not be ashamed." Then, as often as mis- givings and alarms come over us, we must " stir up the grace of God which is in us by imposition of apostolic hands." For " God hath not given us a Spirit of cowardice % but of power, and of love, and of brotherly correction and reproof a ;" a Spirit that brings with Him an invisible but real power, to open and shut the kingdom of heaven in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ ; a Spirit of never-failing love and chanty to men's souls, to guide us in the exercise of that more than human power ; and, lastly, a Spirit of kind and fatherly, yet, if need be, uncompromising and fearless rebuke. Let us be only true to our sacred trust : let us put every thing else by for the sake of handing down the whole counsel of God, our good deposit, entire as we received it : and who knows but we may by God's mercy be made instrumental in saving the English Church from ruin not unlike that which has fallen on Ephesus, Smyrna, or Sardis ? At any rate, the Church Catholic, in one country or another, we are sure, will survive and triumph. As of old she has stood before kings and r AetXtW RECOGNISED IN HOLY SCRIPTURE. "219 governors, and it turned to her for a testimony, so now blessed are they whom Divine Providence shall choose and enable worthily to support her cause against popular delusion and tyranny. We, in- deed, as Priests of the second order, are but under- labourers in that most holy cause. Yet the least and lowest among us may look for his share of the blessing, as he has undoubtedly his share of the burthen and of the peril. Is there not a hope, that by resolute self-denial and strict and calm fidelity to our ordination vows, we may not only aid in preserving that which remains, but also may help to revive in some measure, in this or some other portion of the Christian world, more of the system and spirit of the apostolical age ? New truths, in the proper sense of the word, we neither can nor wish to arrive at. But the monuments of antiquity may disclose to our devout perusal much that will be to this age new, because it has been mislaid or forgotten ; and we may attain to a light and clear- ness, which we now dream not of, in our compre- hension of the faith and discipline of Christ. We may succeed beyond what humanly appears pos- sible in rekindling a primitive zeal among those who shall be committed to our charge. Even as Abraham, neglecting all earthly objects, " taught his children and his household after him, to keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment ;" and one part of his reward was, that " God would 220 PRIMITIVE TRADITION, &C. not hide from Abraham the thing which He did b ;" another, that he was made the glorious and favoured instrument for transmitting divine truth through a fallen and corrupt age. b Gen. xviii. 1719, NOTE S. NOTE A, p. 179. Philip, i. 15 18. The construction here adopted varies a little from that commonly received. It may be as well, therefore, briefly to state the exact import of it, and the grounds on which it is preferred. It supposes that the words xyguva-siv and xarayyeAXe^v, are not used here in any technical or official sense, which might answer to the English word preaching, taken as in our version of the Bible, but that they represent the occasional though pro- vidential result of St. Paul's imprisonment having been made the subject of conversation at Rome. Some spoke of it as faithful Christians ; others, the Judaizers more especially, as jealous enemies of Christianity: both became in a certain sense heralds of Christ, the one sincerely and intentionally, speaking the word, as he says just above, the more boldly for his bonds ; the other occasionally, without any purpose of their own, Clearly the words will bear this construction. And the ancient interpreters unite in denying the applicability of St. Paul's expres- sions to heretical teaching. So Tertullian, adv. Marcion, lib, v. c. 20. having quoted the passage from St. Paul, remarks, that " this was the natural place for excepting to the substance of the preaching complained of, had any NOTES, variation of that kind been the cause of this great diversity of feeling. But the Apostle states the irregularity to exist in the motives and tempers of men only, not in their standards of mysterious doctrine. His manner of speak- ing shews) that with whatever purpose they preached, it was one God Whom they preached, and one Christ. * Therefore/ he adds, ' it is nothing to me, whether in pretence or in truth Christ be preached ;' because it was still the same who was preached, whether with pretended or with real faithfulness. It was in respect of their good faith in preaching that he used the phrase ' in truth,' not in respect of the rule of doctrine itself, which they preached. For the rule was all the time one ; but some had genuine, i. e. simple good faith in delivering it; others were too full of subtilties." Again, it appears that in St. Cyprian's time, some had argued from this passage of St. Paul in favour of allowing heretical baptism. St. Cyprian's reply is, " He was not speaking of heretics, nor of their baptism. We cannot shew that he has here laid down any rule pertaining thereto. He was speaking of Christians walk- ing, some disorderly, and contrary to Church discipline ; some, through fear of God, preserving evangelical verity. .... Now, it is one thing for those within the Church to speak in the name of Christ ; another thing for those without (i. e. heretics) to baptize in the name of Christ." Ep. ad Jubaian. p. 204. ed. Fell. comp. Firmilian. ad Cyprian, p. 226. See also S. Chrys. in loco, who agrees with the preceding Father in not interpreting the passage of heretics, but is more express than they in supposing, that it was some sort of formal preaching of which St. Paul complains. It seems, however, a hard supposition, that any should have literally preached the truth of Christ, and exposed themselves to persecution, for the sake of exasperating the emperor against St. Paul. In this, there- NOTES. 223 fore, it may be excusable to depart from St. Chrysostoirt) and rather to understand x^yVcreiv and xarayyeAAeiv, when applied to the adversaries, in a secondary sense, of the pains taken by them to spread the report of the Apostle's imprisonment, which they considered a check and discredit to the Gospel. NOTE B, p. 182. The validity of this conjecture may be best estimated by simply comparing the passage in the original with the preceding and subsequent verses : note xi y^ss avorjroj, OVTSC e7n$ujuuaj xa ^ovaTj Trom'Aafc;, sv xax/a Kotl tpQovcu trryy>jTO, [AKTOVVTSC aAA^Aoyj. r/ Or= 5 r; ^^CTTO'TVJJ xa ^ ] row vifjuov 0EOT, OUK e^ g^ycov rwv Iv ixao) wv STTOIYJO'IX^SV fjj^sTf, aAAa xara TOV auroy eAsov scrcocrsv y^, Sia AOUT^OU TraAjyysvscr/flr^, xt avaxaivcoagcoj IINETMATO^ 'AFIOT, XPI^TOT TOO ai;v*oy. as Sta o TrsTncrrgyxorg^ TO> IliO"To$ 6 Aoyof xa TTS^J 70t;ra>v Tva covnaxr xaAcov I^ycov 0E11. NOTE C, p. 184. The only other notion of the Tra^axara^xr], or apostolical deposit, which can at all approve itself to one versed in Scripture language, is that which would explain it of 224 NOTES. persons rather than of doctrines ; the flock which was given him, the souls committed to his charge : according to the use of the word in the Acts of the Apostles : " They com- mended their new converts to the Lord on Whom they had believed;" and St. Paul "commended the Ephesian elders to God and the word of His grace." But, besides the reasons above given for interpreting the place rather of doctrine, it may be asked whether the very form of expression, Keep the deposit, is such as would have been probably adopted, had pastoral duties been only or chiefly intended. It seems to cast upon the person so admonished rather too much of absolute responsibility, considering that, after all, the success of the pastoral care must depend chiefly on those who are the objects of it. In short, it is a mode of interpreting too much in unison with the overstrained exaggerated demands of our day ; in which it has become a general custom to speak as if every thing depended on the personal qualities of the clergy ; to blame them altogether for failure, and, in consequence, to attribute to them over much of the blessing, with which the Almighty from time to time may be pleased to visit His Church. NOTE D, p. 191. Iren. adv. Haer. iii. 4. " Non oportet adhuc qurerere apud alios veritatem, quam facile est ab Ecclesia sumere ; cum Apostoli, quasi in depositorium dives, plenissime in earn contulerint omnia quae sint veritatis : uti omnis, qui- cunque velit, sumat ex ea potum vitae. Haec est enim vitae introitus ; omnes autem reliqui fures sunt et latrones .... Quid autem si neque Apostoli quidem Scripturas reliquis- sent nobis ? Nonne oportebat ordinem sequi traditionis quam tradiderunt iis quibus committebant Ecclesias ? Cui NOTES. 225 ordiiiationi assentiunt multae gentes Barbarorum, eorum qui in Christum credunt, sine charta vel atramento scriptam habentes per Spiritum in cordibus suis salutem, et veterem traditionem diligenter custodientes. . . . Hanc fidem qui sine literis crediderunt, quantum ad sermonem nostrum, barbari sunt; quantum autem ad sententiam, et consue- tudinem, et conversationem, propter fidem perquam sapientissimi sunt, et placent Deo, conversantes in omni justitia et castitate et sapientia. Quibus si aliquis an- nunciaverit ea quse ab haereticis adinventa sunt, proprio sermone eorum colloquens, statim concludentes aures, lorigo longius fugient, ne audire quidem sustinentes blasphemum colloquium." NOTE E, p. 196. This is not said without recollection of such texts as St. John v. 49; 2 Tim. iii. 15, 16, 17. But it is plain that both these passages speak of the Scriptures of the Old Testament only ; and therefore, if understood exclusively, prove too much. The latter, indeed, adds a general remark on the use of all Scripture ; that being, as it is, all alike divinely inspired, every part of it has its use, for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness ; and must help to the perfection and entire furnishing of the man of God unto all good works. But St. Paul does not there affirm that all truths necessary to salvation are contained in Scripture, any more than he affirms all to be contained in each separate portion of Scripture. These being the passages commonly adduced to prove by Scripture the sufficiency of Scripture, and being evidently inadequate to the purpose, we cannot be very wrong in rather referring to Tradition, as for the Sacred Canon Q 226 NOTES. itself, so also for this rule concerning it ; That it contains or implies whatever points of faith are necessary to eternal salvation. NOTE F, p. 198. Not to travel at present beyond the writings of Irenaeus himself, the following might be cited as passages clearly implying this doctrine. In b. ii. c. 46. he thus lays down the rule to be adopted in interpreting Scripture parables: " A sound, and safe, and religious mind, and one really bent on truth : whatsoever things God has left within our province, and subjected to our knowledge, those such a mind will diligently study to the uttermost, and in the same continually advance, by daily exercise rendering the acquisition of knowledge easy to itself. Now these things are, first, such as come under the cognizance of our sight ; secondly, whatsoever things are openly and unambiguously uttered in the very words of the Divine Scriptures. And therefore the parables, or dark passages, ought always to be expounded consistently with those which are clear." Is it not plain that Irenaeus is here dividing the grounds of human knowledge into two classes, the one of Sight and the other of Faith ; and that his definition of the latter is, " such things as are openly and unambiguously uttered in the very words of Divine Scripture ?" Presently after, he compares those who leave express Scripture for doubtful and fanciful theories of figurative language, to the foolish virgins, who " being freely and in plain terms invited to meet the bridegroom, lose their opportunity, and are shut out of the marriage feast, while they are seeking light from those who busy themselves in the dark with forced expla- nations of parables." Again, in the very passage above quoted, p. 191, where he speaks most highly of real aposto- NOTES. 227 lical tradition, he clearly intimates that the Scriptures are parallel to it in substance. The mere question, If we had not the Scriptures, must we not follow tradition ? implies, that having the Scriptures, we have the substance of truths necessary to salvation, and so far depend not at all on tradition. The manner, again, in which Irenaeus every where opposes the heretics to the Scriptures, evinces that they were constantly and unhesitatingly appealed to by the orthodox, as the foundation, without going further. E. g. lib. ii. c. 54. " These are not fitter guides than the Scriptures : nor does it become us, leaving the writings of the Lord and Moses, and the other prophets, heralds of the truth, to rest our faith on these, whose teaching has nothing sound, but is full of distraction and incoherency." NOTE G, p. 202. The following is the statement of St. Athanasius ; de Deer. Nic. Synod, c. iii. t. i. 210. ed. Bened. xa) 0gOjU,apg7v sTrs^sigovv, ra psy ' aurcSv a}J a-iaonryg wpohoyovv TYJV STTI T^ a atiroov a. The Scholars shall devote a portion of each day to the relief of Christ's Poor, and those afflicted by God with sickness, by carrying food to their respective houses, and waiting on them when they are the guests of the College : they being " blessed who provide for the sick and needy." 6. The Poor, Widows, Orphans, and all friendless and destitute persons, shall be liberally provided with such help as they need from the College, and shall at least twice in each week dine at the College-table : the selection being made by the Superiors under authority, since " inasmuch as we do it unto the least of them, we do it unto Christ." 7. The Scholars will devote a portion of each day to the attaining such knowledge as shall fit them to be useful and faithful members of the Holy Church of which they are children, and to whom they are devoted for life and for death. The divisions of such work shall be as the Superiors shall direct, between learning from good books, the care of cattle, and the tillage of the ground, as hereafter described. 8. The Scholars shall especially observe rules of devotion and reverence in their respective Bedrooms, they being the places wherein they approach God in prayer, wherein they pass the perilous hours of darkness and helpless sleep, wherein also they may some day pass through their last sickness and the gate of death. 9. The Scholars shall be reminded of their various duties at their respective seasons by the ringing of the College-Bell, the call of which they shall watchfully and punctually obey at all times, it being the likeness of that call we must one day all attend. 10. The Scholars shall solemnly observe the appointed hours of devotion, at Morning, Noontide, and Evening, and shall reverently observe the striking of the hours, seeing how quickly time is passing away and eternity coming on. 11. The Scholars shall rise early, and be active in their ap- pointed works throughout the day ; watchfulness and industry being the duty of all Christian People and faithful Sons of the Church ; sloth and idleness the doors to all evil spirits. 12. The Scholars shall specially observe a respectful and reverential manner to all their Superiors and Betters, the Poor* z2 340 NOTE. the Aged, and those afflicted by God's Providence> " not answering again." 13. The Scholars shall be very careful to observe cleanliness in person and dress, it being a likeness of inward purity. 14. The Scholars shall each have his own respective work, for the care and well-being of the College, in the tending of cattle, cultivating the soil, and carrying on the other works of the College, as they shall be directed j and that cheerfully and with alacrity, without jealousy and discontent, counting it joy to have their work appointed to them, since we are all ignorant of what is for our own good. 15. The Scholars shall strictly observe all hours, seasons, and bounds of places appointed by their Superiors, and shall be careful to appear in the dress of the College. 16. The Scholars shall pay deference and attention to the four Head Boys, who are bound, with God's help, to be themselves patterns and examples, " in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity," for the glory of GOD and CHRIST'S HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH and the BROTHERHOOD to which they belong. Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto Thy Name give the glory, for Thy mercy and Thy truth's sake. POSTSCRIPT TO THE SERMON ON TRADITION, TRADITION is a word of so vague use, and so closely associated, in most men's minds, with a whole host of partialities and antipathies, that it were chimerical to think of escaping objections, though a person's view on the subject were much clearer and more accurate than the author of the Sermon professes to have attained. This consideration ought in limine to check any thought of bitterness, such as is apt to spring up in a writer's mind, when he finds himself charged with opinions which he knows he never held, and believes he never expressed and at the same time it may console him under the fear, which he must more or less experience, lest something incautious or negligent in his way of writing may have led to such misrepresentation, and so may have injured what he conscientiously believes to be a most important and sacred cause. As it is, he may perhaps be excused for waiving any detailed notice of the censures with which the Sermon has been visited ; not out of any disrespect to their authors, but under the sincere conviction, that the subsequent remarks, if duly followed up, will explain and justify, to considerate persons, whatever may have appeared questionable in the original argument. 342 Tradition) no novelty in the English Church. On a general view of what he has read and heard in opposition to the idea of Church Tradition here enforced, he finds matter, first, for serious protest on his own behalf, and, secondly, for serious caution to all who approach that subject. I. 1. He is principally anxious to remove any impres- sion which may exist of his wishing to recommend a new theory, a rule of faith devised for present occasions, by any particular school of divines, now or at any former time. On the contrary, he is persuaded, that what he is endeavouring to inculcate is no other than the very rule of the Church of England, as distinguished on the one hand from Roman usurpation, on the other from rationalistic licentiousness. And in support of this persuasion he appeals to that array of standard English Divines, whose views concerning Tradition are exhibited under the title of Catena Patrum, in the Tracts for the Times, No. 78 : which Tract was subjoined to some former editions of this Sermon. If he err in his estimate of the spirit of the English Church, it will appear, he trusts, by those ex- tracts, that at least his error was not of his own invention that he has both high and ancient authority for it. With this reference the topic of novelty might be dis- missed ; but there is one great name occurring in the Catena, to the benefit of which some may deny that the argument has a full right : and as there are appearances to the contrary, a few words may be allowed in explanation. The name meant is that of Bishop Jeremy Taylor ; in one of whose latest Sermons, a Sermon addressed to his Clergy during his Episcopate, the following occurs among the rules for securing in corruption of doctrine : " Next to this analogy or proportion of faith, let the consent of the Catholic Church be your measure, so as by Opinion of Bishop Taylor. no means to prevaricate in any doctrine, in which all Christians always have consented. This will appear to be a necessary rule by and by ; but in the mean time I shall observe to you, that it will be the safer, because it cannot go far ; it can be instanced but in three things, in the Creed, in ecclesiastical government, and in external forms of worship and liturgy. The Catholic Church hath been too much and too soon divided : it hath been used as the man upon a hill used his heap of heads in a basket ; when he threw them down the hill, every head ran his own way, ' quot capita tot sententise ;' and as soon as the spirit of truth was opposed by the spirit of error, the spirit of peace was disordered by the spirit of division ; and the Spirit of God hath overpowered us so far, that we are only fallen out about that, of which if we had been ignorant, we had not been much the worse ; but in things simply necessary, God hath preserved us still unbroken ; all nations and all ages recite the Creed, and all pray the Lord's Prayer, and all pretend to walk by the rule of the Commandments, and all Churches have ever kept the day of Christ's resur- rection or the LORD'S day holy ; and all Churches have been governed by Bishops, and the rites of Christianity have been for ever administered by separate orders of men, and those men have been always set apart by prayer and the imposition of the Bishop's hand ; and all Christians have been baptized, and all baptized persons were, or ought to be, and were taught that they should be, confirmed by the Bishop, and presidents of religion ; and for ever there were public forms of prayer, more or less, in all Churches; and all Christians that were to enter into holy wedlock were ever joined or blessed by the Bishop or the Priest: in these things all Christians have ever consented, and he that shall prophesy or expound Scripture to the prejudice of any of these things, hath no part in that article of his Creed; he 344 Bishop Taylor on the proper uses of Tradition: does not believe the holy Catholic Church, he hath no fellowship, no communion with the saints and servants of GOD"." In the Dissuasive from Popery, a work of the same i date, he says, " The great use. of the Fathers, especially of the first three hundred years, is to tell us what was first, . to consign Scripture to us, to convey the Creed, with sim- plicity and purity to preach Christ's Gospel, to declare what is necessary and what not b ." . . Again, in the Ductor Dubitantium, " There is yet one more use of Tradition, but it is in rituals Such are, 1 . The observation of the Lord's day, solemnly once a year, and less solemnly once a week ; i. e. the feast of Easter, and the weekly Sunday. 2. The government of the Church by Bishops, which is consigned to us by a tradition greater than some books of Scripture, and as great as that of the Lord's day ; and that so notorious, that thunder is not more heard than this is seen in all the monuments of antiquity. 3. Offices ecclesiastical to be said and done by ecclesiastical persons ; such as are, the public prayers of the Church, the conse- cration of the blessed Eucharist, the blessing of the married pairs and joining them in the holy and mysterious rite of marriage, the consecration of Bishops by Bishops only, &c. These three are the most universal and apostolical Tra- ditions ; which, although they have also great grounds in Scripture, yet because the universal practice and doctrine of the Church of GOD in all ages and in all Churches primitive is infinitely evident and notorious, less liable to exception, and an apt commentary upon the certain but less evident places of Scripture, therefore these may be placed under the protection of universal Tradition ; for they really have it beyond all exception ." Vol. vi. p. -V2C. ' Vol. x. p. 312. r siii. 118. his agreement with the doctrine of the Sermon. 345 Passages of this kind (and many more might be adduced) would seem to shew, that when Bishop Taylor speaks in disparagement of Tradition, he means only such as the Church of Rome avouches : Tradition of the substance of doctrine, independent of Scripture, and purporting to be of things necessary to salvation. For the form of doctrine, i. e. for the Creed, or selection of fundamental articles ; for ritual matters ; and for Church government, he accounts it not only useful, but (morally and practically speaking) necessary. And he repeatedly and distinctly assigns the reason for the different degree of authority which he attributes to it in the two cases ; viz. that in practical matters it may be verified, but in doctrinal (with the exception of the Creed) it cannot. If it could, his own statement is, it ought to be received on the same ground as the Scriptures, the distinction of written and spoken being but an accident d . Now in all this it will be difficult to shew in what instance Bishop Taylor's doctrine varies from that of the Sermon, except it be in these two particulars ; which do not, it is conceived, affect the main argument : first, that the Sermon mentions Interpretation of Scripture as another possible field of genuine Tradition, besides those which Taylor has specified ; and, secondly, that although Taylor, in a passage above cited, appears to make certain d x. 418. " Tradition signified either preaching or writing, as it happened. When it signified preaching, it was only the first way of communicating the religion of Jesus Christ ; and until the Scriptures were written, and con- signed hy the full testimony of the Apostles and apostolical Churches respectively, they, in questions of religion, usually appealed to Tradition." Then quoting the passage of St. Ireneeus, which is cited in the Sermon, he adds, " That which was true then, is also true now ; for, if the Apostles had never written at all, we must have followed Tradition ; unless God had provided for us some better thing." Comp. p. '{*">. 346 Change apparent in Bishop Taylors opinion. traditional practices absolutely necessary to Church com-, munion, yet in his Ductor Dubitantium, a work of an earlier date by a few years, he had followed up his mention of the same observances thus : " Whatever can descend to us and be observed in this channel, there is no sufficient reason to deny it to be apostolical ; but then how far it can be obligatory to all ages and to all Churches will be another consideration 6 ." On comparing the two statements, it may be perhaps thought, that this great man, like his prede- cessor Hooker, as he grew older, became more convinced of the importance as well as genuineness of those portions of the Church system, which are most concerned in this controversy f . And it may be observed, that any admis- sion from him, apparently narrowing the terms of commu- nion, comes to us with peculiar force ; his tendency, as the Liberty of Prophesying shews, being quite the other way ; indulgent and liberal (as many will judge) to a fault, and not well brooking the austere denunciations of some even of the primitive Creeds. On the whole, we need not have much hesitation in adding the name of Bishop Taylor to the illustrious cloud of witnesses for Primitive Tradition, so conspicuous in English Theology. e xiii. 139. f " It is something in favour of Vincentius's rule, that it has been received, extolled, and acted upon, by such men as Bidley, Jewel, Grotius, Overal, Hammond, Beveridge, Bull, Hicks, Bramhall, Grabe, Cave, and our own Archbishop King ; that it has been admitted expressly even by Chilling- worth; and that it has been unreservedly acknowledged as a just and true guide, by Bishop Taylor, in one of his latest works, his Visitation Sermon at Connor ; a tribute, this last, the more remarkable, because in his Liberty of Prophesying, and in his Ductor Dubitantium, he had spoken less respectfully of the principle, and his remarkable change of language can be accounted for only by his having undergone a correspondent change of sentiment. He had seen, felt, and weighed every difficulty ; the result of all was, a deliberate persuasion that Vincentius was right, and that he himself had been wrong." Bishop Jebb, Letter liii. in Forster's Life, ii. 249. Traditional and Scriptural Truth blended. 347 It is in behalf of their constant doctrine, and not of any modern invention, that the writer desires further to pro- test against certain undue assumptions, on which, as it appears to him, is based nearly the whole of the reasoning of the deniers of Primitive Tradition. 2. Because it is affirmed that the full Tradition of Christianity existed before the Christian Scriptures, and so far independent of them, we are charged with alleging two distinct systems or words of God, the one written, the other unwritten, running as it were parallel to each other quite down to our own time. But this, by the terms of the case, is plainly unwarranted. If a man were to say that the Severn and the Wye rise separately in the same mountain, one higher up than the other, must he therefore maintain that they never meet before they reach the sea ? Tradition and Scripture were at first two streams flowing down from the mountain of God, but their waters presently became blended, and it were but a vain and unpractical inquiry, to call upon every one who drinks of them to say, how much of the healing draught came from one source, and how much from the other. On account of those who would poison the stream, it is necessary from time to time to analyse it, and shew that it contains no ingredients which were not to be found in one or other of the two fountains ; and in so doing, it becomes incidentally mani- fest, at least in some measure, what portion each of the two has contributed to the general mass; it is manifest, for example, that all necessary credenda, all truths essential to salvation, are contained in the Scripture itself; and is it not equally manifest, that many helps of the greatest con- sequence, nay I will say generally necessary, to the right development and application of Scripture, are mostly if not entirely derivable from Tradition ? And is it not a poor kind of reasoning to say, Tradition would have been 348 No Tradition irrespective of Scripture. worthless had we been left to it alone, therefore it cannot be of any value, now that Scripture has been all along at hand, to check, to sustain, to interpret, to rectify it, as the several occasions might require ? Yet this is the whole substance of many men's argumentation on the subject : they have argued against an imaginary case, instead of addressing themselves to the realities of Church history; and have thus given an advantage to Romanists on one side and Rationalists on the other, of which neither party has been slow to avail itself. Such is not the way of the English Church ; she does not so violently sever the dif* ferent parts of the constitution of the Kingdom of Heaven, but acknowledging Scripture as her written charter, and Tradition as the common law, whereby both the validity and practical meaning of that charter is ascertained, vene- rates both as inseparable, members of one great providential system ; without confounding their provinces, or opposing them to each other, in the manner of modern Rome. Why should it be thought a thing incredible, that persons should be found among her members and ministers desirous to follow, as God shall give them grace, in so plain, sa reasonable, so moderate, so safe a way ? Because they call attention to the fact, that " Primitive Tradition is recognised in Holy Scripture," as being, AT THAT TIME, of paramount authority ; why should they be presently suspected of having a system of their own in reserve ; a theory, like some parts of Romanism, still independent of Holy Scripture, and to be supported by modern tradi- tions ? more especially if they themselves are careful to declare and exemplify the use they wish to make of the fact in question ; viz. to illustrate and enforce, by its aid, certain portions of the existing Church System, which they consider to be especially in danger. 3. I say, of the existing Church System, here in England : Tradition helps to appreciate our Church- System. 349 for this is another point on which some protest seems to be required. It is sometimes assumed, that the traditions and practices, which the Sermon has most in view, are " obscure and obsolete ;" and that where persons are called on to search in antiquity for genuine relics of the Apostles, " the question of course concerns those points which are not embodied in our own formularies." In assuming this, the fact is overlooked, that in the very page of the Sermon here referred to, the chief points in question are specified ; " being such as these : the canon of Scrip- ture ; the full doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation ; the oblation and consecration of the Eucharist ; the Apo- stolical Succession;" to which, perhaps, it might have been well to add the doctrine of baptismal Regeneration. Surely it is not too much to say, that these points are " embodied in our own formularies ;" and, if there be any of them about which the Clergy are unhappily not agreed, it is not too much to hope, that in so far as the right use of Tradition may clear up what is ambiguous, whether in those formularies or in Scripture itself, it may give some help towards bringing us to a better agreement. This is the very chiefest advantage which the warmest recom- menders of Tradition in our Church expect from it ; viz. that attention to it should very much elevate men's ideas of the existing system, proving it divine in many points where they now ignorantly suppose it human. This, and not the establishment of any mere theory, new or old, is the immediate object of those who have most earnestly urged, from time to time, the reverential study of Christian antiquity. Not that they would entirely shut out the hope of improvement in many respects : thankfully as they own that God has preserved to us all things on which the being of a Church depends, they yet feel that much is wanting more, probably, than can ever be supplied of 350 Tradition compatible with the Sixth Article ; the perfect order and harmony of the apostolical age. Nor do they feel it any breach of fidelity to the Church of England, to join in the confession of one on whom she has ever prided herself, as among her truest children and chiefest ornaments : " The second temple could not reach the first, And the late Reformation never durst Compare with ancient times and purer years, But, in the Church and us, deserveth tears." 4. It may be well to protest, once for all, against the alle- gation so confidently repeated concerning the Sixth Article of the Church of England, that it was meant to set aside the claims of Primitive Tradition. To apprehend the drift of that Article exactly, it must be considered as chiefly intended for a guide to the Clergy : and will be found in that light exactly to correspond with the engagement in the Ordi- nation and Consecration Services, to " teach nothing as required of necessity to eternal salvation, but that which we shall be persuaded may be concluded and proved b^ the Scripture ;" as being " persuaded that the Holy Scriptures contain sufficiently all doctrine required of necessity for eternal salvation through faith in Jesus Christ." A com- parison of the two documents will tend to shew how care- fully they are limited to matters of doctrine, articles of faith, propositions, the belief of which may be deemed fundamental and indispensable. Not that Scripture is not divinely perfect as a rule of life and manners also ; but the framers of the Article were not at the time turning their attention that way : they wished to be understood of neces- sary points of faith, doctrinal conditions of admission into Christ's covenant. Observe the wording of that clause, where they compare the canonical with the apocryphal books. " The other books the Church doth read for which relates to Doctrine ; Tradition to Practice. 351 example of life and instruction of manners, but yet doth not apply them to establish any doctrine." Thus the Article leaves ample scope for the province, which, as we have seen, Bishop Taylor assigned principally to Tradition : practical rules relating to the Church of Christ. For any thing stated in the Article, such rules might be both divine, and generally necessary to salvation, and yet not be contained in Scripture ; but the doctrines or propositions concerning them would not be necessary : it would be wrong to insert them as Articles of the Creed. For instance, St. Ignatius writes as follows 6 : " Let that Eucharist be accounted valid which is under the Bishop, or some one commissioned by him." Wherein he lays down the rule, which we know was universally received in the Primitive Church, that consecration by apostolical authority is essential to the participation of the Eucharist, and so far generally necessary to salvation. Now sup- posing this could not be at all proved from Scripture, (as it may, in a great measure, to the satisfaction of unpre- judiced minds,) still it might be accepted, on the above evidence, as a necessary rule of Church communion, with- out infringing on our Sixth Article : but it could not be turned into a proposition, and put into the Creed, because that would make not only the rule itself, as observed by the Church, but the knowledge of it also by the individual, necessary to salvation: and it may be thankfully admitted, that knowledge of the true nature of Sacraments is no where required in Holy Scripture 11 , as a condition of our receiving the spiritual grace they impart. 8 Ad Smyrn. c. viii. h 1 Cor. xi. 29. is no exception to this ; since SiaKpivwv means rather " reverent separation" (from common bread) than " accurate knowledge and discernment" in the modem sense. And compare the inspired narrative, St. Matth. ix. 20, &c. 352 Tradition implied in Articles VI. and VIII. Neither again does the Article say any thing derogatory to the divinely-appointed 1 use of Primitive Tradition, (i. e. of the Creeds of the Church,) in pointing out which among scriptural truths are fundamental, and ought to be made terms of communion : rather it implies an appeal to such Tradition, allowing, as it does expressly, that there may be fundamental truths, the premises whereof only are contained in Scripture, and not the very propositions themselves ; which allowance would throw the terms of communion into no small uncertainty, were it not for the Article next but one directing attention especially to the three Creeds, as adequate to supply what the former Article had left want- ing ; and both together completing the rule of faith ; the Creeds presenting the conclusions to be believed, the Scripture confirming them out of the mouth of God. Moreover, the principle itself of the sufficiency of Scrip- ture is mainly a traditional principle ; although when once put in possession of it, we find it irresistibly confirmed by contemplation of the contents of the written Word. But on this subject it were presumptuous to do more than refer the reader to the masterly discussion by Mr. Newman, in the llth, 12th, and 13th of his Lectures on the Prophetical Office of the Church. One question only shall be added. Do we not discern, on this hypo- thesis, a very beautiful and instructive harmony between the several provinces of evangelical teaching ? the pre- liminary principle, the sufficiency of the written Word, being taught by Tradition and confirmed and illustrated by the Bible, just in the same way as the several doctrines are afterwards. And is not this analogy, as far as it goes, both a material confirmation of the general statement, and also an indication of the purpose of moral probation, which we may believe was one final cause of the whole arrange- Gal. i. 8. English Canon 0/1571. 353 ment ; just as, under God's natural government, our pro- bation is the more entire from the circumstance, that we receive our first impressions from Testimony, but must use Observation to confirm or correct them, and cannot long depend upon either quite alone. Now since we are bound to receive the Articles in their literal and grammatical sense, this construction might be fairly maintained, whatever were the known sentiments of those who at first imposed them ; but the argument for it becomes more forcible, when it is recollected that the same Convocation, which first enforced subscription on the Clergy, passed also the following Canon for the regulation of preaching throughout the kingdom : " That the Clergy shall be careful never to teach any thing from the pulpit, to be religiously held and believed by the people, but what is agreeable to the doctrine of the Old or New Testament, and collected out of that very same doctrine by the Catholic Fathers and ancient Bishops." This Canon, passed in 1571, under the auspices of Archbishop Parker, has been often quoted, (among others, repeatedly by Bishop Taylor k ,) as expressing the genuine, permanent sense of the Anglican Church on the matters in question. And it seems fair and natural that it should be so quoted, as often as we are asked on what authority, and by whose warrant, our Clergy can be called upon to walk by the rule of primitive anti- quity, rather than by their own private judgment. 5. As to any suspicion which may have arisen about limiting Primitive Tradition to mere formularies, and ministerial faithfulness to the investigation and custody of the traditional safeguards of faith only : such suspicion must vanish, of course, when it is once well understood, that the " depositum" so much insisted on includes to us the written Word, as in the first age it doubtless included k Works, x. 131, 322, 404. A a 354 In what sense the Creed is sufficient. the Scriptures of the Old Testament. Still, that in the first age there were Creeds and Catechisms, and that the apostolical writings sometimes allude to them, we may well take the liberty of believing : being strengthened in this interpretation by the witness of Bishop Taylor, who, speaking of the Apostles' Creed as " having been always in the Primitive Church esteemed a full and perfect digest of all the necessary and fundamental Articles of Christian religion 1 ,'' goes on to say: "St. Paul gave us the first formal intimation of this measure, in his advices to St. Timothy : f Hold fast the form of sound words m which thou hast heard of me in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus. That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us.' This was the depositum that St. Paul left with Timothy ; the hypotyposis or summary of Christian belief, the Christian Creed, which St. Paul opposes to the profane new talk- ings, and the disputations of pretended learning ; meaning that this symbol of faith is the thing on which all Chris- tians are to rely, and this is the measure of their faith." Surely it were unfair, on account of such a sentence as this, to accuse Bishop Taylor of shutting up either the Apo- stles' teaching, or the trust committed to their successors, in one scanty form of words. It is not the form of words, but the substantial truths, which are meant, when people speak of our still having the Primitive Creed, and of its exclusive vital importance to the very being of the king- i x. 458. m Bishop Taylor here gives the interpretation of this phrase most approved among moderns. The turn given to it in the Sermon, p. 188, being rather different, it may be right just to mention the reasons of the difference ; which are, 1. The want of the definitive article in the Greek : exe VTTOTVTTUO-IV, not eX T"V 6. 2. The mode of paraphrase adopted by the ancients, especially Chrysostom and Theodoret. Elsewhere Bishop Taylor expounds rfarov ^s in Rom. vi. 17. as conveying a like allusion, x. 129. Error of requiring infallible Evidence. 355 dom of heaven. Neither, should it appear at any time requisite to urge on the Clergy, as their paramount care, the integrity of doctrinal faith, is this necessarily any dis- paragement of practical religion, of pastoral vigilance, or of any other of their objects and duties. II. Thus much by way of protecting the scriptural argument for Primitive Tradition against certain mis- apprehensions under which it appeared to labour. It may be well to add a few cautionary remarks, obvious enough, yet not always regarded by those who take an interest in this subject. 1. We should be careful that we are not, unknown to ourselves, expecting demonstration, where practical proof only is attainable, and ought to be sufficient. Somewhat of this error appears to lurk in those minds, which reject the notion of a rule of faith made up of Scripture and Tra- dition together, on the ground that Scripture is infallible, Tradition merely historical. They appear to reason as if there could be no faith without demonstrative infallible evidence. The truer statement surely would be, that such evidence, complete in all its parts, leaves no room for faith ; and therefore we are no where left to such evidence alone. Is it not so, that in regard of those truths, the evidence whereof is most entirely scriptural, we are yet to depend on common historical proof both for the genuineness and the right interpretation of the text ? And as the stream can rise no higher than the fountain, so our assent even to scriptural truths differs not from our assent to other well- attested historical propositions, so far as the kind of evidence is concerned. The great point in which it does differ is the deep feeling of awe and reverential attention with which it is naturally accompanied, from the very circumstance that God Himself, as we have reason to believe, is speaking from heaven to assure us of these A a 2 356 Error of expecting entire Satisfaction ; things. Now as far as we have reason to consider any traditional or ecclesiastical rule as being in effect the voice of God, so far we shall naturally treat it (the substance of it) with the same kind of reverence as we should treat both the substance and the very words of a text from the Bible. For instance, could we be once fully satisfied that the order of consecration of the Holy Eucharist, such as it is gathered out of the Primitive Liturgies, was established by the Apostles under the guidance of the Holy Ghost, we should be affected by it much as we are by the apo- stolical writings themselves ; i. e. with reverence inferior only to that with which we regard our Lord's own words in the Gospel. Suppose we are not fully satisfied on the point, but only discern a strong probability, sufficient for a wise man to act on ; yet surely we are bound, if circum- stances allow, to act on it with all devotion : and our doing so will be an exercise of faith, and may humbly hope for the reward of faith. This instance may serve to shew, that the distinction alluded to is not valid, since on the one hand, scriptural evidence must always presuppose a found- ation in that which is historical ; and on the other hand, historical or traditional evidence may lead us back to a point so very near the Throne of God, as to require of us something of the same kind of feeling as if we heard Him speaking in Scripture. 2. Closely allied to this caution is another, too apt to be forgotten by both extremes in this controversy : Not to speak or argue as though we had any right, a priori, to expect full satisfaction and comfort here in our religious enquiries. Who are we, that our satisfaction, our comfort and ease of mind, should be the regulating point (if one may so call it) of the machinery of God's dispensations ? the index whereby to determine in what measure and degree the Almighty shall have revealed Himself to His leads men to narrow the Terms of Communion. 357 creatures ? Yet this is virtually premised, both in the schools of Rome, when they argue that there must be on earth an infallible judge of controversies, otherwise the Church will be left in comparative discomfort; and also by those Protestants who account Tradition inadmissible, because it is, as they judge, always more or less " uncer- tain and slippery ;" who seem to think that nothing can be, practically, an object of faith, except what is " very distinct in character, clear in its credentials, well authen- ticated in its details ;" and who consider it a sufficient objection to an account of a mystery, that it leaves the nature of the transaction dubious, and admits of no clear statement. Experience shews that there is too much danger, lest the enemy take advantage of this longing after completeness and clearness, to turn men aside, ingenious men especially, from the strait and narrow and sometimes broken way, towards some path of human framing, more enticing to such minds, because it seems distincter in its end, better defined and more continuous in its course. But clearness and symmetry of doctrine are a dear pur- chase, when Christian truth and duty must be impaired for their sake. After all, a fragment of the true Temple is worth all the palaces of modern philosophical theology. One ill effect of the tone of mind just mentioned, and one which is very little suspected by the parties them- selves, is this, that it sets them on limiting our enquiries and opinions more strictly than the Church does : they seem to themselves to move in such fulness of light, that they become after a time quite impatient to see others feeling their way, walking as in twilight, and betraying more or less uncertainty : they little suspect that, perhaps, all the while, they may be but " walking in the light of their own fire, and in the sparks which themselves have kindled," while the others may be gradually learning to 358 Danger of Rationalism more or less unconscious; " trust in the name of the Lord, and stay upon their God n ." However, in the state of things which the holy Prophet here describes, those who seem to themselves illuminated become after a time, as was said, impatient of the caution and comparative timidity of the others, and are wont to interfere, more or less rudely, to force or frighten them into their own way. Is it not from some impression of this kind, that among the persons who are most averse to Tradition, on this express ground, that they require things to be distinct and certain, are those who would tie us down most strictly to the very letter of the Homilies ? although it is most clear from the wording of the 35th Article, that the recommendation of them to the Church by authority was but general as to their substance, and bore express reference to that particular time . Nay, and the matter has been carried so far as to demand rejection, at the hands of the Clergy, of all that is (not " inconsistent with," but) " unauthorized by" the Thirty- nine Articles : as if the Articles were either a rule of faith, or a complete system of theology ; as if they were in any sense conditions of lay communion ; as if the Prayer Book added nothing to the declaration of the mind of the Church of England ; or as if, on the other hand, it were impossible to urge any thing as vitally important, without setting it forth as a formal condition of Church communion, nay, even of final salvation. 3, But the cardinal point, on which, it would seem, all men require warning, from beginning to end of these dis- cussions, is the irreverent use of reason. There is continual danger of our treating as profane what, for ought we know, may be sacred, though not as yet proved to be so ; danger of slighting Divine mysteries because we cannot n Isaiah 1. 10. > See Bishop Jebb, Practical Theology, ii. 283, &c. Example affecting the Canon of Scripture. 359 comprehend or explain them ; danger of forfeiting Divine grace, because, being unable to trace its workings, we will not be at the trouble of seeking it. Even in the course of the brief controversy which the Sermon has occasioned, some remarkable facts have occurred, to strengthen the impression which all Church history would make, as to the ill tendencies inseparable from disregard of antiquity. For example, in answer to the allegation, that our assurance of the spiritual interpretation of Solomon's Song depends mainly on a constant tradition of the early Church-, it is replied, that a spiritual interpretation is, from the evidence " of the book itself, the only one that is con- sistent with its canonicity p ." What is this but expressly submitting the Canon of Scripture, so far, to each man's private taste and judgment? what is it but laying down rules beforehand what inspired writings ought to be ? At this very time, in regard of this very book, we see the effect of such licentious discussion ; the most distinguished living theologian among dissenters having refused to accept it as part of the sacred Scripture, on the ground that he cannot see how it may be expounded in any sense which he considers worthy of a divine origin q , The opponent of Tradition, indeed, goes on to say, that " we are scripturally led to interpret the Canticles as we do the forty-fifth Psalm, and many similar portions of Scripture." But how are we so led ? Not by any reference in the New Testament, for the book is not once cited or alluded to, but by analogy of several passages in which the same kind of allegory is employed. Now how do we know that we have a right to assume such an analogy here ? Scripture itself does not affirm it. Reason is not so positive about it, but that many distinguished interpreters have laid down a rule inconsistent P Ohr. Observer, May, 1837, p. 328. Scripture Testim. to the Messiah, i. 46. ed. 2, 360 Principle of the Spiritual Interpretation of Canticles; with such an application of it the rule, namely, that nothing must be received as a type, without' "solid proof from Scripture itself" of " the Divine intention in the correspondence between it and the antitype." The most that we can attain to, on such premises, is to say, that the book may be possibly canonical, (i. e. if history is right in saying that it made part of the Jewish Scriptures at the time when our Lord set His seal on them ;) but on the interpretation of it we must be absolutely silent, for the literal meaning is pronounced unworthy of Scripture, and, concerning any other, nothing is revealed. Nor would this be incredible to such as are convinced, that we are in no sort judges beforehand what sort of a book Scrip- ture was likely to be, how far intelligible at all, how far its own interpreter : but to those who have made up their minds that it must be " a volume which may be under- stood," and understood " without traditional aid 8 ," the case is too likely to prove matter of serious -offence. The more comfortable, surely, as well as the more religious way is, to accept, with all reverence, whatever intimations God has graciously vouchsafed for aiding our conviction, both of the genuineness and of the right exposition of the sacred books. Let us ask of those to whom Scripture was first delivered, those who had the means of consulting inspired persons as to the meaning of obscure places. We shall find these agreeing in the following rule of interpretation : That the types and figures which the New Testament expressly notices out of the Old, are but a few out of many, specimens or ensamples, as it were, of the manner in which the Holy Ghost wills us to regard the whole of the former dispensation. This gives us just what we want: authority for applying the imagery which we find in the * Bishop Van Mildert, as quoted in Home's Introduction, ii. 724. Chr. Obs. ubi supra. not disproved, because liable to Abuse. 361 forty-fifth Psalm and elsewhere, to the exposition of the similar imagery in Solomon's Song; although the two differ in this material point, that the one is formally quoted in the New Testament, the other not even obscurely alluded to. When we take into consideration the witness of the first ages, we feel that this sacred application rests no longer on our own critical conjectures, but upon fair practical evidence, that men of God so taught in the- beginning of the Gospel. To this it will be presently said, You are claiming the sanction of inspiration to all the extravagancies of the early mystical expounders. And it may be as shortly replied, We are doing no such thing: we claim attention to the fact, that a certain rule of interpretation was recognised by those, who could not, all things considered, be deceived in the matter ; but it does not follow that in their application of the rule they were left in no measure to their own fallible judgment. The principle, that Scripture is suf- ficient for the substance of the faith, is a sacred principle, and infallibly, i. e. certainly, true, without any kind of exception ; yet men may err, and have erred, in their selection of fundamentals out of Scripture. So in this matter of primitive exposition ; we may receive with respect, nay with awe, the rule of regarding the New Testament quotations as ensamples only of the true way to interpret the Old, without at all claiming infallibility for the details of any comment, professing to be founded on that rule. Not but that, in some instances, the catholic consent, even on details of interpretation, is so marked and unques- tionable, and comes with so much authority, as to justify us in concluding, that besides the general rule regarding all types, they had a special witness from the first age to the meaning of the Holy Ghost in those particular texts. Unconscious Rationalism, in regard of Sacraments. A prominent case of that kind is the allegorical application of the Canticles: concerning the proof of which from antiquity, whoever permits himself to speak lightly, had better take care lest he be found slighting a very gracious providence of God, for the protection of a portion of His word, peculiarly exposed to the rudeness of the scorner. Such an one will perhaps do well to consider, whether he be going the true way to encourage, in himself or in others, veneration for the Bible. 4. This instance has been dwelt on the longer, as peculiarly apt to confirm and illustrate the position, " that the Holy Scriptures themselves may be fast losing reverence through the resolute defiance of Tradition which some affect." And is there not ground to apprehend the like with regard to the Holy Sacraments also ? What but a too exclusive jealousy of Tradition could have prevented the writer of the sentence noted below * from perceiving, that it sounds as if he were scornfully denying all supernatural virtue in the Holy Eucharist? a denial which, of course, was very far from his thoughts. For the life-giving miracle, the mention of which so offends him, is simply this, that " the Body and Blood of Christ are verily and indeed taken and received by the faithful in the Lord's Supper." And it is called " life-giving," because it is the appointed means of participation of Christ, Who is " a quickening Spirit," and " our life ;" even as He Himself said, " I am that Bread of life," and " he that eateth My Flesh and drinketh My Blood hath eternal life." Neither is God hereby robbed of His prerogative, any more than * Christ. Obs. May, 1837, p. 329. " As to Mr. Keble's notions of ' the life-giving miracle' of ' Christ's real Presence,' which ' has been left throughly mysterious both by Scripture and Tradition,' we shall only say, that the records of Popery abundantly prove that mysticism is neither theology nor piety." The Holy Spirit honoured in the Primitive Eucharist. 363 our Saviour could be said to forego His prerogative of opening the eyes of the blind, when He first spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and then anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay. Nor is the Holy Spirit, as some fear, at all dishonoured by this statement, in respect of His Office as the Lord and Giver of Life. Rather we may shew from the Primitive Liturgies", and from that of our own Church as it was originally formed from them, that the honour of God's Spirit in the Holy Sacrament is no way so effectually vindicated as by appealing to ecclesiastical Tradition. The Primitive Liturgies, with the exception perhaps of the Roman, agree in distinctly invoking God the Holy Ghost to descend upon the sacred elements, and prepare them to be the communication of Christ's Body and Blood (and therefore of life supernatural) to the faithful. E. g. the Alexandrian Liturgy, denominated from St. Basil, (the very words of which, in not a few cases, may be satis- factorily traced back at least to his own time,) appoints this supplication to be used immediately after the com- memoration of the words of institution 1 . " We therefore, also, remembering His holy sufferings, His rising again from the dead, His ascension into heaven, His sitting on the right hand of Thee, Who art God and Father, and His glorious and fearful coming again, offer unto Thee Thine own, out of Thine own gifts. And we supplicate and beseech Thee, merciful and gracious Lord, we Thy sinful and unworthy servants, and worship Thee, that by the good pleasure of Thy goodness, Thy Holy Spirit may u Which, in those points wherein they agree, are equivalent to a genuine formulary of the first age. See Palmer's Dissertation on Primitive Liturgies, prefixed to his Oriyines Liturgies, and Tracts for the Times, No. 63. * S. Basilii Op. ed. Bened. t. iii. p. 678, 9. 364 Eucharistical Invocation of the Holy Ghost. come upon us Thy servants, and upon these Thy gifts here set forth, and sanctify and exhibit them to be most holy : and may cause this bread to become the holy Body of Him our Lord God and Saviour Jesus Christ, unto forgiveness of sins, and eternal life, to all who partake thereof: and this cup, the precious Blood of the New Testament of Him our Lord and God and Saviour Jesus Christ, unto forgiveness of sins and eternal life to all who partake thereof. And do Thou count us worthy, O Lord, to partake of Thy holy mysteries, unto sanctification of soul and body and spirit, that we may become one body and one spirit, and may find a portion and inheritance to possess with all Thy saints, who from all time have been well-pleasing in Thy sight." The first Prayer Book of King Edward VI. directed consecration to be made as follows : " Heare us, O mercyfull Father, we beseeche Thee, and with Thy Holy Spirite and worde vouchsafe to blesse and sanctifie these Thy gifts and creatures of bread and wine, that they may be unto us the Bodie and Blood of Thy most derely beloved Sonne Jesus Christe ; Who in the same night," &c. (as in our present Service.) So far is the teaching of Tradition, on this point, from neglecting to honour the Giver of Life in the Sacrament of eternal life. On the contrary, it may be thought, that if circum- stances had permitted this part of the ancient Service to be retained, communicants would have been so much the more effectually taught to give glory to the blessed Spirit, not only by the tenor of the Liturgy itself, but also by the light which it would have thrown on certain passages of holy writ, which, as things are, they hardly understand to refer to the Communion at all ; such (e. g.) as where the Corinthians are reminded, " By one Spirit ye have been all baptized into one body and ye have -Scriptural Allusions to that part of the Liturgy. 365 been all made to drink into one Spirit 7 ;" and where St. John mentions together as Three combining in One witness, the Spirit, and the Water, and the Blood : pre- mising his remark with the following verse, which, to any one familiar with the ancient Liturgical Services, must have sounded very descriptive of the Communion : " This is He that came" (or rather " cometh," Ixflwv) " by water and blood, even Jesus Christ:" (for in those days they always mixed water in the cup of blessing ; and some, at least in St. Cyprian's time, thought they might consecrate with water only z ; which error and irreverence, if it existed in St. John's day also, might give occasion to the following clause :) " Not by water only, but by water and blood. And," he proceeds, " it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is Truth," or " The Truth :" that which causes the reality and substance of the Sacraments, and hinders them from being mere signs and shadows. This conjectural interpretation is offered without any prejudice to the part which holy Baptism may be reasonably sup- posed to claim in the inspired allusion and argument, since there also is a combination of the visible water and the y 1 Cor. xii. 13. " i. e. We have arrived at the same mysterious privi- lege, we partake of the same table. And why said he not, We are fed with the same Body, and drink the same Blood ? Because, by the word Spirit he indicated both both the Blood and the Flesh for by means of both we are made to drink of one Spirit. But as I think, he is here speaking of that visitation of the Spirit which takes place after Baptism and before the holy Communion :" eKeivr^v rov I1NETMATO2 r-^jv tTTKpolTyffus, r^v cwrb TOV PatrTiff/jiaTos Koi TTpb roov fj.vffT'npicav fyyii/o/Jifj/f]!/ rjfuv." See St. Chrys. in loco. As much as to say, that the Spirit here spoken of is the Holy Ghost, shewing Himself especially in the two Sacraments ; by His regenerating grace ensuing upon the Sacrament of Baptism, and by His consecrating grace preparing both the worshippers and the elements for the Sacrament of the Eucharist. z Ep. 63. p. 148, &c. Ed. Fell. 366 Apostolical Succession : Analogy of the Course of Nature. cleansing blood of Christ, and the Holy Spirit is the agent, and has the glory". 5. The Apostolical Succession is another subject sure almost to attract to itself whatever particles of instinctive rationalism may be lurking in the mind to which it is presented. But surely in the outset it may claim to be treated with seriousness, on the ground urged by Bishop Butler against the despisers of religion in general; viz. that the a priori objections which occur to ingenious men concerning it, are such as may be urged against God's natural government, which is plain undeniable matter of fact, in spite of all such objections ; therefore the Aposto- lical Succession may, as far as similar objections go, turn out matter of fact also, and the light extemporal way in which many reject it may have results similar to those, which attend the like rejection of other mysteries, whether of natural or of revealed religion. This consideration alone ought to protect the doctrine against insinuations, whether grave or sportive, that it is of course unworthy of God, because it represents Him as making the spiritual welfare of one man depend on the manner in which another executes his trust. Whatever is said against that dispensation would hold against what we daily see in the course of nature, as we call it. The moral condition of children is influenced by the conduct of their parents ; of subjects by that of their rulers, and the like ; and why should it not be a Another text, which is with great reason supposed to convey the same allusion, is Eom. xv. 15. " The grace that is given me of God, that I should be the Minister (\firovpybv) of Jesus Christ unto the Gentiles, exercising the priest's office (tepovpyowra) in respect of the Gospel of God : that the offering up (irpoff to the consenting report, and faith delivered and preached to other Churches, especially the chiefest, where the memory of the Apostles was recent and permanent. The mysteriousness of Christ's priesthood, the perfection of His sacrifice, and the unity of it, Christ's advocation and intercession for us in heaven, might very well be accounted traditions, before St. Paul's Epistle to the Hebrews was admitted for canonical ; but now they are written truths, and if they had not been written, it is likely we should have lost them. But this way could not long be necessary, and could not long be safe"." Nay, and we have higher testimony yet to appeal to, St. Luke wrote his Gospel to Theophilus expressly for this end, that it might be a " document of proof;" not to supersede the catechetical instructions (that is, in other words, the traditions) of the Church, but to make us all (Iffiyvwvai) know more firmly than ever, rr t v &v 'A7roa"r<$Aa>j/ 8ta ra>v irareptoV nal SiaKpiveiv, K. r. A.. 392 The Nicene Fathers had in view the Form of the Faith. may not err, taking the one for the other, which is the case of the Arians." The same principle he more briefly ex- presses, though without the term p^a^axryjg TOU Xi;^a rrjs ev XPI^TH* w/ in fact, a manifest conviction [of the same], which, being read before all, caused at first hearing inconceivable grief to the audi- ence, -z% sxrgoTrys eveKot, on account of its great deviation; and brought incurable disgrace upon the writer." This shews that a confession of faith was required from the innovators at least ; and that, according to the statement of St. Athanasius quoted in the Sermon, it was met with a burst of censure at first hearing, as new and perverse. But we have also a letter of Eusebius the historian p , tending to throw light on the mode of proceeding. It is addressed to certain upholders of the new opinions, and purports to explain the part which he, Eusebius, had taken in subscribing the Greed of the Homoousiori. " I have sent you herewith," he says, " as the case required, first the written statement which I offered concerning the faith, afterwards the other, which they have published, with certain additions of their own to my expressions. My formula then, read in the presence of our gracious sovereign, and approved as good and genuine, stands thus. n Socr. i. 10. p. 38 ; Soz. i. 22. p. 43G ; Gelasius ap. Concil. i. 425. Ap. Theodoret. i. 7. 'fls Se e^VjTetro TTJS Trto-rews 6 rp6-jros, K. r. A. P Ap. Theodoret. i. 11 ; Socr. i. 8. p. 23 ; St. Athanas. i. 238. 398 Nicene Council : Creed of Eusebius Pamphilus : ' As we have received from the Bishops before us, in our first catechetical instruction, and when we were baptized ; as also we have learned out of the divine Scriptures, and (what is more) as we have both believed and taught in our offices of Presbyter and Bishop, so now also believing, we offer unto you our faith. We believe in orre God,' &c.s irapc\dfio/J,fV Trapa ruv irpb TjfJLuiu fTTiffKAirow, cv rrj irpcaTr) /carr;%^(rei KCU tire rb \ovrpbv ^Kafj-^dvo^v, Ka&c/as Kal airb rSav Of LUIS ypafywv jue/ia07j/ca/iej/, fcal us fv ain$ T(p irpefffivreptcp Kal 4v aiirfj TTJ ttriffKOTrfj eTnoreuo/ieV re Kal eSiSarr/co^.ei', ourw Kal vvv iriffTevovres, r^v f]fj,Tepav iriffnv irpocra.va(pepofj,fv, K. r. X. ordinary Practice of succeeding Councils. 390 profession of faith, had its origin, or at least found sanc- tion, in the proceedings at Nicaea. The Preface to the Arabic Version of the Nicene Canons, as translated by Bishop Beveridge, states, that " the Confessions (profes- siones), discourses, and sentences of the several holy Fathers [there assembled], were preserved in fifteen books 1 ." The document referred to is most probably apocryphal ; still there was evidently a tradition as to the form of their proceedings, agreeing in substance with what has now been advanced. Some centuries further back, (A. D. circ, 830,) Isidorus Mercator had inserted in the Preface to his Edition of the Councils 8 a kind of formulary for the holding of a synod; one of the directions of which is, that as soon as the synod has been regularly opened " collatio pariter et instructio de mysterio sanctce Trinitatis habebitur, simulque et ordinibus qfficiorum, si in omnium sedibus ejusdem celebritatis unitas teneatur:" i. e. "A com- parison and explanation shall take place concerning the mystery of the Holy Trinity, and also concerning the orders which relate to [ecclesiastical] offices : [to ascertain] whether or no unity be maintained in all the sees of the aforesaid assembly." And a little below, that " on the three days of solemn supplication, with which the synod is to open, there shall be no business transacted, nisi sola collatio de mysterio Sacrosanctcs Trinitatis, et de ordinibus sacris, vel qfficiorum institutis ; excepting the comparison [before mentioned] concerning the Mystery of the Most Holy Trinity, and concerning sacred orders, or regulations of offices." Reverting to the course taken in particular councils : of what passed at the second general synod at Constantinople, r Concil. Harduin. i. 526. E. Ibid. Prsef. Isid. Merc. p. 7. B. C. Compare the Note at the end of this Postscript. 400 Council of Constantinople, a Witness to Tradition : A. D. 38 1, we have no detailed account. The Council, in their report to the emperor Theodosius II. state them- selves to have first renewed their concord, opovolav, with one another'; which word Concord might seem to relate to their settlement of the disputes then existing about the see of Constantinople : but the narration of Socrates" shews that the comparison of doctrinal views preceded that arrangement; and in the course of it he twice uses the word to denote their consent in the orthodox faith. At all events, they have left it on record, that their adherence to the Nicene Creed was not without reference to the witness of the Church in all ages concerning the Creed of the Apostolical times. " Whether it be persecutions, or afflictions, or threats from our sovereign, or cruelties from persons in office, or any other trial, which we have endured from the heretics, we endured it on behalf of the evangelical faith, as ratified in Nicaea by the three hundred and eighteen Fathers. For this must needs find acceptance, both with you and with us," (they are addressing their brethren, the Bishops of the Church Universal,) "and with all who pervert not the word of the true faith : being most ancient and suitable to our Baptism, and teaching us to believe in the Name of the FATHER, and of the SON, and of the HOLY GHOST V The Nicene Creed, as enlarged at Constantinople, came, it seems, presently to be regarded as so complete a symbol of sound doctrine, that it superseded in general all necessity * Cone, Harduin, i. 808. B. u Lib. v. c. 8. p. 265. * Concil. i. 825; Theodoret. E. H. v. 9. c H/*e?s yap efoe Stwy/j-ovs, efre 6\tyeis, etfre fiaffiXiKas cwretActs, elfre ras ruv a.p\6vTwv cwyuo'HjTas, efre nva ireipafffjibv erepbv irapa T>V alperiKcov virefj.etvaiJ.ev, irrrep TTJS evayyeXiK^s TricrTeus, Tys ev NtKaia rrjs BiOvvlas irapa riav Tit] irarepuv Kvptadelffi^s, virea'T'rjiJ.ev' ravrriv yap Kal v/juv Kal rjfuv Kal naffi ro?s fj.^ StaffTpetyovffi rbv \6yov TT)S a\-r]6ovs Triarrecas ffwapeffKeiv 8e?, irpefffivrdTiriv ovaav, Kal o.K6\ovQov rep /JairTur/uaTj, Kal SiSdffKOvffav f)/j.as Triffrevfiv els rb ovo/J.a rov ITATPO2, Kal TOV TIOT, Kal rov 'Aylov FINETMATO2. Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon. 401 for a confession, to be made by each several Bishop, of the belief of himself and his Church, at the first meeting of a Council. Thus at Ephesus y , professing to observe the exact order of the Canons, they entered on the doctrinal discussion by a solemn recitation of that Creed ; " in order that all might be said concerning the faith being compared with that exposition, such sayings as harmonized therewith might be received, and such as varied therefrom rejected." The expression of opinion at Chalcedon was still more re- markable. In the first session the emperor's commissioners proposed to begin the proceedings of the second by a written confession of faith on the part of the several Bishops*. " Let each boldly set down his faith in writing, having the fear of God before his eyes ; with the under- standing that our sovereign's own faith is guided by the con- fessions of the Nicene and Constantinopolitan Fathers, and the canonical epistles and expositions of the holy Fathers Gregory, Basil, Athanasius, Hilary, Ambrose, and the canonical epistles of Cyril, which were read at Ephesus." Two days after, in the second session, they renewed their proposition a . " The point," they said, " which now demands our inquiry, judgment, and serious attention, is the reinforce- ment of the true faith. That, more than any thing else, is the object of the synod. Knowing then, that to God Him- self you will give account each for his own soul, and also for us all, who desire to be rightly instructed in Christianity, and to have all doubt taken away by the concord and consent, and harmonious exposition and teaching, of the venerable Fathers, give diligence without fear, favour, or dislike, to set out the faith in its purity : so that those also, who, compared with the general body, appear to be otherwise minded, may, by acknowledgment of the truth, be brought back to unanimity." To this, the Bishops y Concil. i. 1361. E. * Ibid. ii. 273. A. * Concil. ii. 284, 5. Dd 4 02 Nicene Creed, how received at Chalcedon, and elsewhere: replied by acclamation, "Other exposition [of the faith] no man maketh, nor do we endeavour nor dare to put forth any ; for the Fathers have taught us, and the things set forth by them are preserved in writing ; contrary to these we have no power to say any thing." The acclamation was repeated more than once : " We make no fresh con- fession in writing : the Canon forbids it : the old confession is enough : let the rules of the Fathers prevail :" which Florentius, Bishop of Sardis, enforced by the strong reason, that " it was not possible for them to write hastily on the faith, taught as they were to obey the holy Nicene Council, and that which was rightly and religiously assembled at Ephesus." Then was recited the Nicene Creed; whereupon their acclamation was b : " This we all believe ; in this we were baptized, in this we baptize this is the true faith ; this is the holy faith ; this is the eternal faith . . . thus we believe, every one of us." A reference to the Councils would shew other examples of the like especial deference paid to the Creed of Nicsea, as ratified by the four synods above mentioned c . One more only shall be here mentioned. The Assembly at Trent, in their third session and first decree concerning the faith, " decrees and determines before all to begin by this confession of their faith ; following herein, as they say, the examples of the Fathers, who, in their more venerable Councils, when commencing business, have been wont to hold out this, as their shield against all heresies what- soever* 1 ." Well had it been for them and for us, had they followed antiquity as religiously in all things ! So far, then, as the practice of other Councils aifords b Ibid. 288. A. c E. g. 2 Constantinop. t. iii. 70; 3 Tolet. t. iii. 471 ; Emerit. iii. 999 ; 11 Tojet. iii. 1019 ; 3 Bracarens. iii. 1031 ; 3 Constantinop. iii. 1060, &c. d Concil. t. x. 20. same in substance with the Apostles'. 403 any presumption of what was done at Nicsea, we should expect to find that the Fathers looked in the first place to their Creeds before acknowledged, which as yet, perhaps, were mostly unwritten 6 ; and did not set themselves, as though hitherto destitute of formularies, to the compiling of an entirely new one by their own judgment out of the Scriptures. And this expectation is confirmed by the substance of the Creed itself: which every child must perceive to be substantially the same formula with the old baptismal Creed, the Creed of the Apostles f , only ex- panded in the two points which specially required it. And as to those additions and explanations, they were indeed most carefully and reverentially proved from Scripture, yet even in them the Fathers went to Church Tradition g for the critical and decisive phrase, " of One Substance with the Father;" on which we have ever since mainly depended, as constituting one of our best securities against the profane conformity of heretics in heart. These, and similar considerations, have appeared here- tofore to learned men so decisive, that they have not scrupled to make such affirmations as the following h : " That ecclesiastical tradition, which Vincentius Liri- nensis so much commends, did especially consist in the confessions or registers of particular Churches. Now the unanimous consent of so many several Churches as exhibited their confessions to the Nicene Council, being not dependent one of another, was a pregnant e Compare St. Hilary writing to the Bishops of Gaul : " Blessed are ye in the Lord, and glorious, who, retaining the perfect apostolical faith in the confession of the inward conscience, to this hour know nothing of written professions of faith." De Synodis, c. 63. p. 1187. Ed. Bened. f See the Creeds of Alexander and Eusehius, as quoted before ; and compare the accounts given by Tertullian and Irenaeus; and Bp. Bull, Jud. Eccl. Cnthol. &c. . 4, 5, 6; with Grabe's annotation. f S. Ath. i. 230. De Deer. Nic. Syn. . 2527. h Jackson's Works, iii. 892. 404 Jackson and others on the Proceedings at Nicaa. argument to any impartial understanding man, that this faith, wherein they all agreed, had been delivered unto them by the Apostles and their followers." And again ' : " The unanimous consent of so many distinct visible Churches, as exhibited their several confessions, catechisms, or testimonies of their own and their forefathers' faith, unto the four first ^Ecumenical Councils, was an argument of the same force and efficacy against Arius and other heretics, for whose conviction those Councils were called, as the general consent and practice of all nations in worshipping some divine power or other, hath been in all ages against the Atheists Nothing, besides the evidence of truth delivered unto the Christian world by Christ and His Apostles, would have kept so many several Churches as communicated their confessions to the Councils of Nice and Ephesus, &c. in the unity of the same faith." Hear, again, Leslie, speaking of the provincial synod, which prepared the way for the proceedings at Nicaea. " This was the method taken in the Council called at Alexandria against Arius; it was asked by Alexander, the Archbishop who presided, Quis unquam talia audivit? * Who ever heard of this doctrine before ?' And it being answered by all the Bishops there assembled in the negative, it was concluded a novel doctrine, and contrary to what had been universally received in the Christian Church. Thus every doctrine may be reduced to fact: for it is purely fact, whether such doctrine was received or not V Bishop Taylor says 1 : " It is not certain that the Nicene Fathers at their meeting recited any other Creed than the Apostolical:" assuming that they recited some Creed. And after all, though some doubt were still thought to hang on the exact order of their deliberations, their general ' Jackson's Works, iii. 892. k See Catena Palrum, No. iii. p. 102. X. 462. S. AtJmnasius refers the Nicene Creed to Tradition. 405 rule is surely expressed, with sufficient plainness, and on unexceptionable testimony, in the three following passages of St. Athanasius. First, of the instinctive and inevitable comparison which the new doctrines underwent with those before received, he writes: " Who m , on hearing the word Son, does not conceive in his mind the thought of identity of substance with the Father ? Who, when he learned in his first Catechism, that God had a Son, and made all things by His own Word, did not so receive it in his mind as we now understand it ? Who, at the first origin of the impure heresy of the Arians, was not presently astounded at the mere hearing of their words, as at persons uttering strange things, and sowing a new seed, contrary to the Word sown in the beginning ?" Secondly, he presents the Creed to the emperor Jovian, not merely as the judgment of the present Church on the meaning of the Scriptures, but rather as her testimony to the fact, that " this faith had all along been known to all in the Church, being learned and read out of the divine Scriptures. For in this the saints^ being perfected, endured martyrdom, and now are at rest in the Lord. And this faith would have con- tinued throughout unimpaired, but for the wickedness of certain heretics, who have dared to pervert it , , . . although our Fathers lost no time in assembling at Nicaea, and pronouncing the anathema on them. But the faith of the Catholic Church they professed in writing ; so that by the proclaiming thereof every where, the heresy might be quenched which the perverse disputers had kindled"." Lastly, in respect of those portions of the Creed which appeared in some sense new, he is careful to shew that for these also they had authority from antiquity, as well as proof from holy Scripture, (thus acting on the very prin- ciple laid down in the English Canon of 1571, to which Oral. ii. contr* Arian. i. 502. B, I. 780. 406 Athanasius his deep reverence for the Bible. reference has before been made): " The Fathers," says he, " inserted the clause of the Son's consubstantiality with the Father, and anathematised those who affirmed a diversity of substance, not in terms which they had framed for themselves, but which they too had learned from the Fathers before them which being so, the Creed of Nicsea is sufficient, agreeing as it does also with the ancient Bishops ." This shews in what light the framers of the Creed wished it to be viewed ; and that the Church did so receive it, the words of Epiphanius (among others) may serve to testify: "They p professed the faith of the Fathers, orthodox and unswerving, and delivered down to us from the Apostles and Prophets." Now if St. Athanasius and the Nicene Fathers were thus earnest and constant in resorting to Tradition, in order to decide among conflicting interpretations of Scripture, and settle the fundamentals of our most holy faith; that circumstance alone is a sufficient answer to the suspicion, that reliance on Primitive Tradition leads of course to disparagement of Scripture. For certainly, if there be one among divines, ancient and modern, who commits his cause to the witness of Scripture more unreservedly than the rest, and expresses a deeper reverence in listening to its voice, and a more entire preparation of heart to follow whithersoever it shall lead him, that one is the great St. Athanasius. But the more unfeignedly he revered the Bible, and felt the necessity of obeying it in all things, the more thankfully did he avail himself of the greatest of providential helps to the right understanding of the Bible, the record of faith which the New Testament itself assumes to have been taught to those for whose immediate use it was written. That record helps to explain the Scriptures, somewhat in the same way, and with the same kind of Ad Afros, . 9. t. i. 898. C. P Epiph. in Har. Arlon. Instances of Tradition practically infallible. 407 evidence, as the grammar of a language, once rightly taught, explains the sentences of that language. If truth and sound philological knowledge would be advanced by throwing aside the grammar rules which we have learned, and analysing sentences till we have constructed each a new grammar for ourselves, then, and not else, the proposition, that each man must make out his own Gospel from Scripture, discarding all confidence in traditional Creeds, may be tenable in common sense, whatever Piety may think of it. Why is the assurance of faith any more undermined by accepting a constant and practically infallible Tradition, to the effect that what is to us the obvious meaning of the Bible, was always accounted its true meaning, than by accepting in like manner the similar traditions, that these books, and no other, are the Bible ; that these words in English answer to the corresponding words in the sacred languages, out of which they profess to be translated ? Indeed, were it not for Romish corruptions, it would not be at all easy to enter into the mind of those who feel concerning Primitive Tradition otherwise than as if it were a great and real help from above. See what it comes to in this case of the Nicene Creed. Had the interpretation and anathema therein contained been merely the deliberate judgment of the three hundred Bishops, undoubtedly this would have been a very material fact : more material, perhaps, con- sidering all things, than the like assent at any other time : still the whole would have been matter, not of testimony, but of opinion, and could not have proved, in any sense, an end of controversy. It might still be said, as unthinking people now say, " Why should I submit my judgment to the judgment of three hundred persons assembled at Nicsea fifteen hundred years ago?" However, as the matter stands, we have the full benefit of their judgment, (for the remains of St. Athanasius. alone are sufficient to shew, that they 408 Peculiar Force of the Nicene Tradition. fully and critically examined the Scriptures on all the disputed points) : and we have moreover this greater this unspeakable benefit ; that by them has been preserved the irrefragable testimony of the Church to the fact, that the Apostles interpreted the Bible in this way, and held their interpretation to be fundamental. The argument may be thus stated. Christians disagree among themselves which are the essential, fundamental truths of their religion. Now if we could know in what doctrine Theophilus, (e. g.) to whom St. Luke wrote, had been catechised, we should know these fundamental truths : those truths which the eye-witnesses and ministers of the Word did most emphatically deliver to their converts. Now of course the fundamentals taught to Theophilus were the same as those taught to other converts: they were, in short, the baptismal Creed. However that Creed might vary in terms, as it was occasionally delivered by the Apostles and their successors, it must have been the same in substance all over the world ; being not so much the Creed of the several Apostles, as of that Holy Spirit, by Whom they were all alike guided. Can we any how ascertain the substance of that Creed ? The Council of Nicaea enables us to do so, practically and effectually nay, infallibly. For the fact to which the three hundred prelates bore witness, was one in which they could neither be deceived themselves, nor be able to deceive others. They must have known each one of them the baptismal Creed of his own Church, and the interpretation of it there commonly received, and professed by himself in his letters communicatory when he first entered on his epis- copate. They could not, therefore, be deceived them- selves. Neither could they deceive others : for, (not to dwell on the evidence of sincerity which many of them had given, and some afterwards gave again, by enduring The Nicene Creed universally accepted. 40i) pain and privations for the Gospel's sake,) every Chris- tian must have known his baptismal Creed, and every Bishop must have known what letters communicatory he had received from his newly-ordained brethren. More- over, their testimony ranges far beyond those who were actually present in the Council. They were in the nature of a representative body ; and it may be remarked by the way, that the Church councils are perhaps the first decided instance in the w r oiid's history of the adoption of that mode of government. The three hundred and eighteen were but so many out of the eighteen hundred prelates of the Roman world, whom circumstances per- mitted to be present at the Council y and their decisions were scrupulously communicated to their absent brethren, and formally approved by them, with very trifling excep- tions. " Know, O prince beloved of Heaven," writes St. Athanasius to the emperor Jovian q , " that these things have been preached from the beginning, and this Creed the Fathers who assembled at Nicaea confessed ; and to these have been awarded the suffrages of all the Churches every where in their respective places : both in Spain, and Bri- tain, and Gaul, and all Italy and Dalmatia, Dacia and Mysia, Macedonia and all Greece ; and in all Africa, and Sardinia, and Cyprus, and Crete, Pamphylia and Lycia, and Isauria, and those in Egypt and the divisions of Libya, and Pontus and Cappadocia, and those near us, and the Churches in the east, all besides a few persons who take part with Arius. For as to all the aforesaid, we know by their conduct what their judgment is ; and more- over, we have their letters. And thou knowest that should there be some few who speak in opposition to this faith, they cannot create any prejudice against it, the i I. 781. Even the Arian Philostorgius bore witness to their unanimity. Ad crt/r. Thpodoret, E. H. 409. B. Ed. Vales. 410 A 7 o prevailing political influence at Niccea. whole world maintaining the Apostolical Creed." We need not, therefore, hesitate to accept the Nicene formula as the testimony of all the Churches. Any suspicion which might arise, of the proceedings having been tainted by political influence, is sufficiently obviated by what remains of Constantine's own corre- spondence at that time. Whether from ignorance, he being yet a catechumen and recent convert, or from the habit of looking at all things with the eye of a mere statesman, or from whatever reason, he was far, indeed, from entering into the views of St. Athanasius and those who acted with him. His language in the letter to Alexander, whereby he at first endeavoured to stifle the controversy, was such as this r : "A certain empty question, w r hich ought neither to have been asked nor answered . . . an argument kindled not concerning any main point of the Divine com- mands .... no new heresy brought in ... a dispute about matters trifling to an excess of insignificance . you may keep up communion with each other, however decidedly your opinions vary in some minute point of detail." And it is too well known how easily he was afterwards perverted by the arts of Eusebius. The agreement, therefore, among the Bishops was in no sort the result of state influence : it can only be explained by the fact, that such was in reality the tenor of the traditional confessions of their several Churches. Now such a harmony of statements all over the world, even beyond the limits of the Roman Empire, (for the In- dians too are mentioned as allowing the Creed 8 ,) admits of no account but a common origin ; and that common origin can only be the first Gospel, as it was every where preached ' Ap. Socr. i. 7. p. 15. D. E ; 16. C ; 17. C. 8 St. Ath. ad Afros, . 2. avrri iraffav ryv o\KOv^vt]V irewh-fipuKf ravrrjv eyvwffav Knl 'I/5ol, ol fcVot irapa rots &\\ois ftapfidpots (Vt Xptffnavol. i. 892. B. The Nicene Creed, a Moral Demonstration. 411 by Apostles and apostolical men. It is, in fact, a complete instance of successful application of the triple test of Vincentius. The " uUque" is insured by the Council representing all Churches ; the " semper" in each Church, by the succession of Bishops, each receiving the Creed as a trust at his consecration ; the " ab omnibus" by the like delivery of the same Creed to every Christian at his Bap- tism. The whole together constitutes an infallible tradi- tion, of the same sort as that which induces us to receive the Scriptures themselves as genuine. And the comparison of it with Holy Scripture, which took place at Nicasa, and has been since repeated over and over, is the same kind of satisfactory confirmation to it, as when, in sur- veying a country, a line on being actually measured is found to be exactly of the length, which it ought to be on computation, perhaps through a long series of triangles. Such an operation strengthens the surveyor's confidence, on the one hand in the goodness of his instruments, on the other in the accuracy of his figures : just as the coin- cidence of Scripture and Tradition at Nicaea tends to prove (may we not say morally demonstrates ?) both that the tradition is apostolical and that the interpretation is sound. Nor does it appear that the Arians of that time often, if ever, questioned this broad statement of Church practice ; they commonly satisfied themselves with meta- physical and critical objections to particular words in the Creed, or particular constructions of the text of Scripture. Now because the Romanists make bold with the word Tradition on very diiferent matters from this mere in- structions of a part of the present Church, in no wise able to stand the test of Vincentius, even supposing them uncon- tradicted in Scripture are we therefore to throw aside or depreciate a tradition, established as we see the Nicene Creed is ? Can we fairly say it is of small use, either in 412 Tendency of the Doctrine of Primitive Tradition, confirming the natural interpretation of God's word, or in directing us what sort of points to esteem fundamental ? Can any one of us soberly say y with any degree of con- fidence, where he himself might now have been without it? Take a case but too possible : suppose an inquiring person, not scholar enough to detect the falsehood and sophistry of the Arian and Socinian interpretations, nor to follow the argument when others detect them; must not this man rest his faith on Tradition ? i. e. on the assurances of better scholars than himself, that the words of Scripture really mean what the Church says they do ? And which Tradition would be safer and more consoling, that of a few scholars and their writings, or that of the Apostolical Church, pro- perly so called ? Surely this latter, rightly understood, is a great blessing, and touches the foundation, and we cannot be too thankful for it. Surely men know not what they are doing, when they go about to shake our reliance on it. In conclusion, a few words shall be offered to those who recoil from Tradition not so much on argumentative grounds, as because they seem to feel that whatever is introduced, over and above the words of Holy Scripture, lessens the sacredness of any religious contemplation, and hinders it from being altogether devotional. Such persons would do well to consider, whether the view which they depreciate would not tend to put them more entirely in possession of the words of Scripture, exempting them once and for ever from haunting doubts, and leaving them free to such thoughts as piety delights in. Let them once fairly endeavour to imagine themselves convinced that the Nicene Tradition is true and divine, and see what would then be their feelings on the subject. It would be with them in some measure as if a voice came from Heaven, to say, This and this only is the meaning of the Scriptures touching the foundation of the faith. Were such a miracle to keep our enquiries devout and humble. 413 to be vouchsafed, would it take away veneration from the Scriptures ? Would it shake our confidence in them ? Would it not be welcomed by some as a deliverance from doubt ; by others as' superseding in a great measure all necessity for that kind of critical discussion of God's Word, which is continually leading them into peril of irreverence ; by all, as a most merciful addition to the supernatural treasure of Faith and Hope ? Now the case of the Nicene Tradition is perhaps as near an approach to the realization of this supposed miracle, as might consist with the ordinary course of God's moral government. Perhaps, had the evidence for it been more overpowering, no room would have been left for the requisite trial of our faith. It follows, that we obtain in this way not only more entire conviction of understanding than if we were left to the unaided study of Scripture, but more also of that which is, on earth, Faith's appropriate sanction and encouragement the reverential sense of the immediate presence of God. We discern an echo, as it were, of the Divine voice, remote but unquestionable, and infallibly guiding us towards the true and only temple : a ray, not from Antiquity only, but from the very Source of light, falling on the pages of the Bible, and bringing out in its full lustre that high and sacred Truth, which many might otherwise have failed to discern, and many more feared to enunciate. As things are, we see it so clearly, that we can hardly understand how any one should ever miss it ; and so, as in many other instances, the very abundance, anticipating our want, hinders our being duly thankful. But it is the part of Faith to remedy this ; and the part also of Charity to remember our brethren, who feel, many of them, and own their need of such guidance. Of course, if so it had pleased Almighty God, the Scriptures might have been all clear of themselves ; or 414 Tradition, God's providential Way with us. their meaning might have been clearly revealed to indivi- duals at a certain stage of their progress in the Christian life : or there might be somewhere in the present Church an unerring court of appeal to fix their interpretation. Men may go on imagining the advantages of such a dis- pensation, until they have persuaded themselves that things are really so ordered. But theories of that kind, after all that can be said in their favour, must they not incur the censure of true wisdom, as partaking of " that idle and not very innocent employment of forming imaginary models of a world, and schemes of governing it 1 ?" How much better, humbly to acquiesce in God's dispensations as we find them ! How much more dutiful, with all seriousness to use our privilege of belonging to a Church, which on the one hand refers us to Scripture as the standard and treasure of all necessary doctrine, on the other hand " ties her doctors, as much as the Council of Trent does, to expound Scripture according to the consent of the ancient Fathers"." t Bp. Butler, Pref. to Anal sub fine. Bp. Taylor's Works, x. 322. Note: Ancient Form for holding Church Synods. 415 Note, see page 399. It may be well to insert here the whole of the formulary for the opening of a synod, as it is given by Isidore, and from him by Hardouin in the Preface to his " Concilia," t. i. col. 610. The order according to which the sacred Synod should be held in the Name of God, At the first hour of the day, before sunrise, let all he cast out of the Church ; and, the entrances being harred, let all the door-keepers stand at the one door, through which the Prelates are to enter. And let all the Bishops, assembling, go in together, and take their seats according to the time of their consecration. When all the Bishops have come in and taken their places, next let those Presbyters be summoned, whose admission the nature of the case in hand seems to warrant. And let no Deacon intrude himself among them. After these, may be admitted the more eminent among the Deacons, whose presence is required by the regular form of proceeding. And a circle being made of the Bishops' seats, let the Presbyters sit down behind them : those, namely, whom the Metropolitan has selected to be his assessors ; such, of course, as may act with him both in judging and in pronouncing sentence. Let the Deacons stand in sight of the Bishops : then let the laity also enter, who, by choice of the Council, have obtained the privilege of being there. Moreover, the Notaries must also come in, as is directed by the regular form, for reading documents and taking notes. Then, the doors being fastened, and the Prelates sitting in long silence, and lifting up their whole heart to the Lord, the Archdeacon shall say, Pray ye. And presently they shall all fall on their faces to the earth, as well the Bishops as the Presbyters ; and they continuing long in silent prayer, with weepings and mournings, one of the elder Bishops shall arise, and pour out a supplication aloud unto the Lord, they all lying still on the ground. He shall say, " Behold, we are here, O Lord the Holy Ghost, we are here: bound indeed by our sinful nature as men, yet in Thy name especially assembled together. Come to us, and be Thou with us, and deign to pour Thyself 416 Note: Ancient Form for into our hearts; teach us what we are doing 1 , whither we are going; and shew us what measures it is our duty to take: that, hy Thine own aid, we may he ahle to please Thee in all things. Be Thou alone both the Prompter and the Executor of our decisions, Who alone, with God the Father aud His Son, art Possessor of the glorious Name. Suffer us not to he perverters of justice, Thou, Who most exceedingly delightest in equity. Let not ignorance draw us the wrong way, nor favour hias us, nor acceptation of gift or person coriupt; hut unite us to Thyself effectually, hy the gift of that grace which is Thine only: that we may be one in Thee, and in nothing swerve from the truth ; so that, as we are assembled in Thy Name, we may in all things uphold Justice under the sway of Religion ; so that here our sentence may in nothing depart from Thee, and in future for things well done we may obtain eternal rewards." In this supplication, the prayer of * Our Father' is not to be recited, nor the Blessing, but the supplication only itself to be confirmed [by an 4 Amen.' J But when there are more Metropolitans than one, then by another the following prayer is repeated. " O Lord, Who commandest us to speak justice, and to judge the things that are right ; grant unto us, that neither iniquity be found in our mouth, nor corruption in our mind ; that with a pure heart we join discourse yet more carefully purified ; that justice may go forth in our doings, and no guile be found in our tongue." And by the third Metropolitan, in the third place, the following prayer is recited. " O Lord Jesu, Who hast promised by the sacred oracle of Thy Word, that where two or three are gathered together in Thy Name, Thou wouldest vouchsafe to be present in the midst of them ; be Thou graciously preseut in our assembly, and illuminate our hearts by Thy mercy; that we may so keep the straight path of righteousness, as not in any measure to err from the excellency of mercy." Another : " Unbind, O Lord, the chain of our souls, aud break the bond of wickedness wherein we are held; that for our deliverance we may render praise to Thee, whose chastisement we fear for our trans- gressions. " God, Who wiliest that the truth should be spoken by the sons of men, and whose delight is, that they should deal purely in judgment; holding Church Synods. 417 vouchsafe unto us to have an upright mind, that we may he ahle to utter with our lips the true justice." The supplication being ended, and all having answered ' Amen,' the Archdeacon says again, ' Stand up.' Immediately let all arise, and with all fear of God, and orderly discipline, let Bishops and Presbyters both take their seats. And thus, all in their places sitting silently, a Deacon, wearing the Albe, bringing forward in the midst the Book of the Canons, reads aloud the chapters on the manner of holding Councils; i. e. from the Third Council of Toledo, No. 18: also, from the Canons of the Oriental Fathers, which Martin, [Bishop of Braga,] translated into Latin ; No. 1 8, Of the manner of holding a Synod. Also from the Fourth of Toledo, No. 3. Also from the Council of Chalcedon, No. 18. Also from the Council of Agatha, (Agde in Languedoc,) No. 25 or 26 : or any other of the Canons, which may seem to the Metropolitan fitter to be read. And the extract from the Canons being ended, the Metro- politan Bishop shall address the Council with an exhortation, thus saying : " Behold, most holy Prelates, having first offered our prayer to God, I present myself to your brotherhood with words of affectionate exhort- ation, and by the name of God beseech you, that whatsoever things you shall hear spoken by us, concerning the Deity, and concerning sacred orders, or religious conduct, you will receive with all piety, and with entire reverence strive to fulfil. Should it so happen that some one of you should differ from any opinion expressed, when we come all of us to mutual conference, let him, without any scruple about making dis- turbance, propose, to be conferred on again, the subjects of his scruple : in order that by God's favour he may either give or receive instruction. In the next place, with the like adjuration, I approach and entreat you, that none of you in judgment either accept persons, or depart from the truth, smitten by fear or favour. Take care that you handle so religiously whatever shall occur to be judged of by our assembly, that neither peevish contention, to the overthrow of justice, find any place among us, nor yet in long searching for equity, the vigour and vigilance of our order begin to grow lukewarm." After this exhortation, wherewith the Metropolitan is wont'to address the whole synod, presently the King, with his nobles, enters into the Council; and first, dismissing the attendant Bishops to a station behind him, turning to the altar, there says a prayer; and the prayer being over, he turns to the Council and speaks. And, falling on his face to the ground, and then raising himself, he both recommends himself to E e 418 Note: Ancient Form for the prayers of the Bishops, and also, addressing the whole Council, with religious exhortation urges on them the duty of acting by the highest rule of justice. His exhortation being ended, the Deacon says, * Let us pray.' Then, the King having turned to the east, let all the Prelates together fall prostrate as before ; and so let the following prayer, with the Lord's Prayer, be recited. " O God our King, who swayest the dominion of kings, by Whose governance it is exalted, and by Whose abandonment itgroweth frail; let Thy servant N. have Thee present as his Director. Give unto him, O Lord, a right and firm faith, and never to grow weary of watching over Thy law. Let him so excel in uprightness of life, that he may be pleasing in the eyes of Thy Majesty: so rule over the nations in this life, that after his departure he may be crowned with the elect. Our Father," &c. The Blessing. " Be thou blessed, most serene Prince, by the Lord of all Powers, and the Almighty God. Amen. May He inspire thee to do mercy, and [therewith] to temper justice. Amen. He who hath assigned to thee the kingdom, may He Himself keep thine heart unharmed from the mischiefs of all people. Amen. And thou in whose sight our assembly is venerable for the Lord's sake, mayest thou, with all thine, after long ages, receive the crown. Amen. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Who, with God the Father, and the Holy Ghost, One God, is glorified for ever." This Blessing having been pronounced, the Deacon says to him, * In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, depart in peace.' Thereupon all shall answer, < Thanks be to God.' And immediately the King retires from the assembly of the Council. After the departure therefore of the King, and the exhortation of the Archbishop before mentioned, shall enter in all who are Priests, Deacons, or in religious orders of any kind, to the hearing of doctrinal discussion. Then the Archdeacon shall read the Canon of the Eleventh Council of Toledo, (No. I.) against tumultuous excitement in Councils. After the reading of this Canon, the proceedings of the Council of Ephesus shall be regularly read over ; then a comparison and explanation shall take place concerning the mystery of the Holy Trinity, and also concerning the orders which relate to [ecclesiastical] offices; to ascertain whether holding Church Synods. 419 or no unity be maintained in all the sees of the aforesaid assembly. In relation also to those causes, as the time of day may allow, shall be read the Epistles of Pope Leo to the Bishop Flavianus, concerning the errors of Eutyches and the mystery of the Trinity; the Canons also concerning unity of offices. Nor shall the Council pass to any other business, until all these have been gone through. Provided always that in the whole three days of solemn supplication nothing else be transacted or discussed, but only the comparison [before mentioned] concerning the mystery of the Most Holy Trinity, and concerning sacred orders, or regulations of offices, so as that these subjects be entirely gone through in the course of those three entire days : that, as aforesaid, nothing else be done, but simply the inquiry carried on which relates to the aforesaid matters: provided also that in every case the proceedings commence with the reading of some document suitable to the order and cause which is to be discussed. A Prayer to be said on the second day at the opening of the Council* " We bow unto Thee, O Lord, the knees of our hearts, and beseech Thee that we may obtain the blessings which we most need at Thy hands ; namely, that walking in watchful care before Thee, we may be of exact judgment in the arduous discrimination [of doctrine], and loving mercy, may be eminent by zeal in such a course as shall please Thee." Also a Prayer y on the third day, rehearsed at the opening of the Council. " From Thee, O Lord, with the words of an inward cry, we ask with one accord, that, being strengthened by the countenance of Thy grace, we may be made fearless heralds of the Truth, and have power to speak Thy word with all boldness.*' After these things, on the fourth day, other causes shall be admitted in order. And thereupon all the religious persons, who on the former days had been present in the Council for spiritual instruction's sake, shall go out; some Presbyters keeping their seats in the Council, whom the Metropolitan shall have appointed to that honour. In any case, throughout the aforesaid three Litany days, both Bishops and Presbyters, with the Minister who bids the prayers, shall begin by prostrating themselves in supplication. And then, after a collect, or a recapitulation of their prayers by the Metropolitan, they shall arise, and discuss, as was said, divine things only. But on other days, all standing 420 Note: Ancient Form for by, the Collect shall be pronounced. And so sitting down they shall judge the matters brought in question. But let no disturbance be allowed, either among those who sit in the Council, or the by-standers. Further, they are to enter into the Council each day in the same manner and order as is herein-before appointed. For the rest, whether they be either Presbyters or Deacons, Clerks or Laymen, not themselves members of the Council, who think themselves bound to appeal to it in any matter, let them give notice of their caftuse to the Archdeacon of the metropolitan church, and let him mention it to the Council ; then let them severally be permitted to come in and state their case. But let none of the Bishops retire from the general assembly until the hour come for all to retire. Again, let no one presume to break up the Council, unless all things shall have been so determined, as that every point which has been settled by common consultation, be subscribed by the hand of every Bishop severally. Provided always, that two or three days before the Council be dissolved, they revise with diligent consi- derations all the Canons they have drawn up, lest haply they may have stumbled in something. Also, that on the day appointed for the breaking up of the Council, the Canons which have been decreed in the holy Synod be read publicly before the Church. And when they are ended, there shall be a choral response of ' Amen.' Then returning to the place where they sat in Council, let them sub- scribe the same Canons. The Metropolitan also must give them notice concerning the next following Easter, on what day it comes on; also of the time in the next year when they shall come to hold Council. Certain of the Bishops, too, must be selected, to assist the Metropolitan in the celebration of the feasts of the Nativity and of Easter. After these things, the Archdeacon saying, * Pray ye,' let all together cast themselves down on the ground ; and when they have there prayed for a considerable time, let one of the seniors recite this prayer : " There is not, O Lord, in any conscience of man such virtue as may be able, without offence, to declare the judgments of Thy will. There- fore, seeing that Thine eyes have beheld our frailty, account it for perfection, we beseech Thee, that it is our chief wish to decide by the perfect rule of justice. Thee in our beginnings we did ask to meet us [with Thine aid] ; Thee again in this termination of our decisions we beseech to be present, making allowance for our deviations. For why? to spare our ignorance ; to allow for our wandering ; to crown the full service of our prayers with full practical efficacy. And because, through the galling of our conscience, we pine away, fearing lest either ignorance holding Church Synods. 421 should have drawn us into some error, or haply too eager will should have urged us to swerve aside from justice: for this we supplicate and beseech Thee, that if we have contracted any offence during the solemn- ization of this Council, by Thy pardon we may find it venial ; and that whereas we are about to give release from attendance on this assembled Council, we ourselves may first be released from all the bands of our own sins : so that as transgressors Thy pardon may attend us, and as confessing our faults to Thee, Thy eternal recompense." To this prayer the prayer called Pater Noster shall be subjoined; and over them still prostrate the following Blessing shall be pronounced : " Christ, the Son of God, Who is the Beginning and the End, vouchsafe unto you the fulness of charity. And may He Who hath brought you safely to the completion of this Synod, cause you to be absolved from all infection of sin. Amen. So that, freed more entirely from all guilt, absolved also by the gift of the Holy Ghost, you may return happily, and seek again unharmed the resting places of your own habitations. Amen. Which may He vouchsafe to grant, Whose kingdom and dominion abideth for ever and ever. Amen" These directions having been observed, and the Archdeacon having said, In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, let us go in peace ;' presently all shall arise together, and the Metropolitan still keeping his seat, all alike, beginning from him first, shall mutually bestow on each other the kiss [of peace]. And thus, with the mutual giving and receiving of peace, the meeting of the Council shall be dissolved. The above document most probably belongs to the good days of the Spanish Church, when it first recovered from Arianism. It must have been drawn up after the llth Council of Toledo, A.D. 675, and apparently before 714, at which time the Saracens began to overrun Spain. This would settle its probable date within about 40 years. THE END. BAXTER, PRINTER, OXFORD. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY PARKER, OXFORD; AND 377, STRAND, LONDON. By the Rev. T. W. ALLIES, M.A., Rector of Launton, Oxon. The Church of England Cleared from the Charge of Schism, By the Decrees of the Seven Ecumenical Councils, and the Tradition of the Fathers. Second edition, much enlarged, with a notice in answer to Mr. Thompson's book on the Episcopate. 8vo. 12*. N.B. This edition is so much enlarged as to amount to a new work. 7^ THE PRESS, By the Rev. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. A New Volume of Sermons. By the Rev. FREDERICK W. MANT. Reginald Vere, a Tale of the Civil Wars, in Verse. By JOHN DAVID MACBRIDE, D.C.L., Principal of Magdalen Hall. Lectures Explanatory of the Diatessaron. THIRD EDITION, ENLARGED. By the Rev. CHARLES MARRIOTT, M.A. Analecta Christiana In usum tironum. Part 2, completing the work. By the Rev. EDWARD BURTON, D.D. The Greek Testament, with English Notes. SECOND EDITION, REVISED. In the Press. Four Sermons Preached at the General Ordinations of the Lord Bishop of Oxford : December, 1845. December, 1846. Trinity, 1846. Trinity, 1847. By the Ven. C. G. CLERKE, Archdeacon of Oxford, The Rev. R. C. TRENCH, Rector of Itchenstoke, The Rev. JAMES RANDALL, Rector of Binfield, .The Rev. E. M. GOULBURN, Vicar of Holywell, Chaplains to the Lord Bishop. By JOHN LOCKHART ROSS, M.A., Late Vice -Principal of the Diocesan College, Chichester. Reciprocal Obligations of the Church and the Civil Power. Inscribed (by permission) to the Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone, M.P. for the University of Oxford. 8vo. 12*. FEBRUARY, 1848. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY PARKER, Of tdt VOLUMES PUBLISHED. S. AUGUSTINE. CONFESSIONS. Svo. Third Edition, price 9s. ; to Subscribers 7s. HOMILIES on the NEW TESTAMENT. Two vols. Svo. Price 2Ss. ; to Subscribers 20s. SHORT TREATISES. Price 16s. ; to Subscribers 12s. ON THE PSALMS. Vol. I. Price 10s. 6d. ; to Subscribers 8s. Vol. II. in the Press. S. ATHANASIUS. SELECT TREATISES AGAINST THE ARIANS. Two vols.Svo. Price 19s. 6d. ; to Subscribers 15s. HISTORICAL TRACTS. Price 10s. 6d. ; to Subscribers Ss. S. CHRYSOSTOM. HOMILIES ON ST. PAUL'S EPISTLES. Vols. 1 to 6, Svo. Price 31. 9s. 6d. ; to Subscribers 21 12s. 6d. Vol. VII, on 2 Corinthians, is in the press. THE STATUES. Price 12s; to Subscribers 9s. ST. MATTHEW. Vols. 1 and 2. Price 11. 4s. ; to Subscribers 18s. S. JOHN. In the Press. S. CYPRIAN'S WORKS. Two vols. Svo. Price 11. 2s. 6d. ; to Subscribers 17s. S. CYRIL OF JERUSALEM. CATECHETICAL LECTURES. Third Edition. Price 10s. 6d.; to Subscribers Ss. S. GREGORY THE GREAT. HOMILIES ON THE BOOK OF JOB. Vols. 1 and 2, Price 30s. ; to Subscribers 22s. . Vol. III. Part 1. Price 10s. 6d. ; to Subscribers 8s. Vol. III. Part 2. completing the Work, in the press. TERTULLIAN'S WORKS. Vol.1. Price 15s. ; to Subscribers 11s. Persons sending their names as Subscribers to this Work are entitled to the Volumes as they are published at one fourth less than the Publication price, payment to be made on the delivery of the books, but no annual subscription required. Twelve months' notice is expected previous to the withdrawal of a name. Persons desirous of becoming Subscribers are requested to transmit their names and the name of their Bookseller to the Publisher, and the Volumes will be forwarded as soon as published. It is feared that some subscribers, either through change of residence or other causes, may not have received the whole of their volumes regularly ; should such be the case, it is requested that the Publisher may be informed in order that the volumes required to complete the set may be forwarded. ** A few complete sets may now be had by new Subscribers at the original Subscription prices. SELECT WORKS OF S. EPHREM THE SYRIAN, Translated out of the Original Syriac. With NOTES and INDICES. Svo. 14s.; to Subscribers to the Library of the Fathers, 10s. 6d. OXFORD; AND 377, STRAND, LONDON. BIBLIOTHECA PATRUM ECCLESI^E CATHOLICS. S. AUGUSTINI CONFESSIONES. 8vo. Price 9s.; to Subscribers 7s. 3 Vols. Svo. Price 21. Is,; to Subscribers II \\s. 6d. S. JOANNIS CHRYSOSTOMI HOMILI^E IN MATTHEUM. Edidit F. FIELD, A.M., Coll. S.S. Trin. apud Cant, nuper Socius. CHRYSOSTOMI HOMILLE in S. FAULT Epistolam primam ad Corinthios. Price Us.; to Subscribers Ws. 6d. S. CHRYSOSTOMI HOMILLE IN D. PAULI EPIST. II. AD CORINTHIOS. Price Ws. 6d. ; to Subscribers 8s. The remainder of the Text of S. Chrysostom's Homilies on S.Paul's Epistles will follow in due course ; Collations having been obtained for the whole at considerable expense. A COMMENTARY ON THE FOUR GOSPELS, COLLECTED OUT OF THE WORKS OF THE FATHERS. TRANSLATED FROM THE CATENA AUREA OF THOMAS AQUINAS. Four Volumes in Eight Parts, 31. Us. DEVOTIONAL WORKS, ADAPTED TO THE USE OF THE ENGLISH CHURCH, FROM THE WORKS OF FOREIGN DIVINES, EDITED BY THE REV. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. The Spiritual Combat, and the Supplement : with the Path of Paradise ; or, The Peace of the Soul. By Scupoli. (From the Italian.) With Frontispiece. 3*. 6d. The Year of Affections. Or Sentiments on the Love of God, drawn from the Canticles, for every day in the year. By Avrillon. 6*. 6d. The Foundations of the Spiritual Life. (A Commentary on Thomas a Kempis.) By Surin. 4s. 6d. A Guide for Passing Advent Holily. By Avrillon. With Frontispiece. 6s. A Guide for Passing Lent Holily. By Avrillon. Second Edition. With Frontispiece. 7s. Paradise for the Christian Soul. By Horst. 2 vols. 6s. 6d. The Life of Jesus Christ, in Glory. Daily Meditations from Easter Day to the Wednesday after Trinity Sunday. By Nouet. 8s. SOME MEDITATIONS AND PRAYERS Selected from the "Via Vitae ^Eternae," to illustrate and explain the Pictures hy BOETIUS A BOLSWERT. Translated from the Latin, and adapted to the use of the English Church. By the Rev. ISAAC WILLIAMS, B.D. With the curious allegorical engravings. 8vo. 10s. 6d. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY PARKER, 81 Hfbrarg of $ftglotfat$*lic Volumes published 1841 to 1846. BISHOP ANDREWES' S ERM O N S, 5 vols. 21. 16s. BISHOP ANDREWES' Pattern of Catechistical Doctrine, &c. 10*. BISHOP BEVERIDGE'S WORKS. Vol. I. to VIII. 4. 8s. ARCHBISHOP BRAMHALL'S WORKS. 5 vols. 3/. 3s. BISHOP BULL'S HARMONY OF THE APOSTLES ST. PAUL AND ST. JAMES ON JUSTIFICATION. 2 vols. IS*. BISHOP COSIN'S WORKS. Vols. I. and II. II. Is. BISHOP GUNNING on the Paschal, or Lent Fast. 9s. HAMMOND'S PRACTICAL CATECHISM. Ws. 6d. HICKES'S TWO TREATISES, On the Christian Priesthood, and On the Dignity of the Episcopal Order. Vol. I. 9s. JOHN JOHNSON'S WORKS. Vol.1. 12*. ARCHBISHOP LAUD'S WORKS. Vol.1. 6*. L'ESTRANGE'S ALLIANCE OF DIVINE OFFICES. Us. MARSHALL'S Penitential Discipline of the Primitive Church, 6s. BISHOP NICHOLSON ON THE CATECHISM. 6s. BISHOP OVERALL'S CONVOCATION BOOK. 8vo. 8s. THORN DIKE'S WORKS. Vols. I. and II., 4 Parts. 21. Volumes for 1847. BISHOP BEVERIDGE'S WORKS. Vol. IX. 10s. 6d. CRAKANTHORP, DEFENSIO ECCLESI^ ANGLICANS. 14*. HICKES'S TWO TREATISES. Vol. II. 9*. JOHN JOHNSON'S WORKS. Vol.11. 9s. BISHOP WILSON'S WORKS. Vol. II. 10*. 6A Vol. III. 10s. 6d. % Vol. I. containing Life, &c. will be published last. Should any Subscriber not have received all the Volumes due for 1847, he is requested to write to the Publisher. Works in course of publication. ARCHBISHOP LAUD'S WORKS. Vol.11. Conference with Fisher. BISHOP COSIN'S WORKS. Vol. III. A Scholastical History of the Canon of Holy Scripture. BISHOP BEVERIDGE'S WORKS. Vol. X. Thesaur. Theol. Vol. XL Codex Canonum Eccl. Prim. Vindicatus, &c. BISHOP WILSON'S WORKS. Vol. IV. BISHOP BULL. Defensio Fidei Nicaenae. Translation. BISHOP PEARSON. Vindiciae Ignatianae. HAMMOND. Of Schism, &c. THORNDIKE'S WORKS. Vol. III. Of the Covenant of Grace. HICKES'S TWO TREATISES. Vol.111. Appendices. JOHN JOHNSON'S WORKS. Vol. III. A Collection of Ecclesiastical Laws, Canons, &c. FRANK'S SERMONS. Subscribers paying two guineas annually in advance are entitled to all the pub- lications without further payment. It is proposed to publish six volumes (of 400 pages on the average) for each year. Persons wishing to become Subscribers are requested to send their names, and those of their booksellers, to the Secretary and Treasurer, CHARLES CBAWLEY, Esq., under cover, to the Publisher, Mr. PARKER, Bookseller, Oxford. *** New Subscribers can select volumes to complete sets. THE VALIDITY OF ENGLISH ORDINATIONS. By P. F. LE Coup AVER. A new Edition, Svo., 10s, 6d. ; to Subscribers OXFORD ; AND 377, STRAND, LONDON. ACADEMICAL AND OCCASIONAL SERMONS, with a Preface on the Present Position of the English Church. By the Rev. JOHN KEBLE, M.A. Second edition, 8vo. 12s. SERMONS and ESSAYS on the APOSTOLICAL AGE. By the Rev. A. PENRHYN STANLEY, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of University College. 8vo. 12s. SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE the UNIVERSITY of OXFORD. By EDWARD HENRY MANNING, M.A., Archdeacon of Chichester, and late Fellow of Merton College. Second Edition. 8vo. 6s. SERMONS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS AND OTHERS. By the Rev. T. W. ALLIES, M.A. 8vo. 10*. 6d. SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE the UNIVERSITY of OXFORD, and in OTHER PLACES. By the Rev. C. MARRIOTT, M.A. 12mo. 6s. SERMONS ON THE FESTIVALS. By the Rev. J. ARMSTRONG, M.A. 12mo. Gs. The TEMPORAL PUNISHMENT OF SIN, and other SERMONS. By the Rev. C. H. MONSELL, M.A. 12mo. 6s. PAROCHIAL SERMONS. By the Rev. W. JACOBSON, M.A., Vice-Principal of Magdalen Hall. Second Edition. 12mo. 6s. SERMONS, chiefly Expository, by R. E. TYRWHITT, M.A. With Notes. In Two Volumes 8vo. l. 4s. A COURSE OF SERMONS on SOLEMN SUBJECTS chiefly bearing on Repentance and Amendment of Life, preached in St. Saviour's Church, Leeds. Second edition, 8vo. 7s. 6d. AN INQUIRY INTO THE MEANS OF GRACE, their Mutual Connection and Combined Use, with Especial Reference to the Church of England; in EIGHT SERMONS at BAMPTON'S LECTURE, 1844. By R. W. JELF, D.D. 8va 10s. 6d. THE WITNESS OF THE SPIRIT WITH OUR SPIRIT. Illustrated from the eighth chapter of St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans: in EIGHT SERMONS at BAMPTON'S LECTURE, 1846. By the Rev. AU- GUSTUS SHORT, D.D., Bishop of Adelaide. 8vo. 7s. 6d. LECTURES ON THE ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF THE THREE FIRST CENTURIES. By the late EDWARD BURTON, D.D. Third Edition, complete in one volume 8vo. 15s. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY PARKER, WORKS BY THE REY. WILLIAM SEWELL, B.D., FELLOW AND TUTOR OF EXETER COLLEGE, OXFORD. A JOURNAL OF A RESIDENCE AT THE COLLEGE OF ST. COLUMBA, IN IRELAND. With a Preface. 12mo. 4*. THE DANGER AND SAFEGUARD OF THE YOUNG IN THE PRESENT STATE OF CONTROVERSY. A SERMON preached be- fore the University of Oxford. 8vo. Is. Also by the same Author. CHRISTIAN POLITICS. 12mo. 6s. CHRISTIAN MORALS. 12mo. Third edition. 5s. THE FIRST VOYAGE OF RODOLPH THE VOYAGER. 12mo. 4s. 6'd. THE SECOND VOYAGE. 12mo. 6s. A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF BUTLER'S ANALOGY, On the plan of Dr. Mill's Analysis of Pearson on the Creed. By JOHN WILKINSON, B.A., Of Merton College, Oxford, and Curate of Exmouth, in the Diocese of Exeter. 8vo. 5s. WORKS OE THE LATE ARCHBISHOP LAURENCE. Third Edition, 8vo. 10s. 6d. AN ATTEMPT TO ILLUSTRATE THOSE ARTICLES Of the Church of England which the Calvinists improperly consider as CAL- VINISTICAL ; in Eight Sermons, preached before the University of Oxford in the year 1804, at the Lecture founded by J. Bampton, M.A. 8vo. 7s. 6d. LIBRI ENOCH PROPHET^ VERSIO ^THIOPICA, Quse seculi sub fine novissimi ex Abyssinia Britanniam advecta vix tandem litterato orbi innotuit. 8vo. Third Edition, 7s. 6d. THE BOOK OF ENOCH THE PROPHET, Now first translated from an Ethiopic MS. in the Bodleian Library. 8vo. 9s. PRIMI EZR^E LIBRI, Qui apud Vulgatum appellatur quintus, versio Ethiopica; nunc primum in me- dium prolata et Latine Angliceque reddita. 8vo. 6s. 6d. ASCENSIO ISALE VATIS, Opusculum pseudepigraphum, multis abhinc seculis, ut videtur, deperditum, nunc autem apud ^thiopas compertum, et cum Versione Latina Anglicana- que publici juris factum. Part I. Second Edition, Price 5s. And Part II. Price 5s. THE DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND UPON THE EFFICACY OF BAPTISM, Vindicated from Misrepresentation. OXFORD ; AND 377, STRAND,~LONDON. DISCOURSES ON PROPHECY, in which are considered its Structure, Use, and Inspiration. By the Rev. J. DAVISON, B.D., late Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford. Fourth Edition, 8vo. 12s. REMARKS ON BAPTISMAL REGENERATION. By the same Author. 8vo. cloth, 2s. 6d. REMAINS AND OCCASIONAL PUBLICATIONS. By the same Author. 8vo. 15s. THE ENGLISH THEOLOGICAL WORKS OF G. BULL, D.D., sometime Lord Bishop of St. David's. A new Edition, 8vo. 10s. 6d. THE DEFINITIONS OF FAITH, and Canons of Discipline of the Six (Ecumenical Councils, with the remaining Canons of the Code of the Uni- versal Church. Translated, with Notes. To which are added, THE APOSTOLICAL CANONS. By the late W. A. HAMMOND, M.A. 8vo. 7s. 6d. PR^LECTIONES ACADEMICS OXONII HABITS, a J.KEBLE, A.M., Poeticae Puhlico Praelectore. 2 vols. 8vo. 21s. LETTERS FROM A TUTOR TO HIS PUPILS. By W. JONES, of Nayland. A New Edition, edited by the Rev. E. COLERIDGE, M.A., Eton College. 18mo. 2s. 6d. ; morocco, 5s. THE PASTOR IN HIS CLOSET; Or, a Help to the Devotions of the Clergy. By the Rev. JOHN ARM! Vicar of Tidenham, Author of "Sermons on the Festivals." 18mo. 2s. 6d. PRAYERS AND OTHER DEVOTIONS FOR PENITENTS, Compiled by the Rev. J. LEY, B.D., Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford. 18mo. Is. 6d. THE CHRISTIAN YEAR. Thoughts in Verse for the Sundays and Holydays throughout the Year. The Thirty-first Edition, 18mo., 6s.; morocco, 8s. 6d. Also Foolscap 8vo. 7s. fid. ; morocco, 10s. fid. And 32mo. morocco, 5s. ; cloth, 3s. 6d. LYRA INNOCENTIUM, or Thoughts in Verse on the Ways of Providence towards Little Children. By the Author of the Christian Year. Fourth Edition, 32mo. 3s. 6d. ; morocco, 5s. Also foolscap 8vo. cloth, 7s. fid. ; morocco, 10s. fid. THE BAPTISTERY, OR THE WAY OF ETERNAL LIFE. By the Author of the Cathedral. Third Edition, 8vo. 15s. cloth; 11. Is. morocco. Also 32mo. 5s. morocco. HYMNS FOR THE WEEK AND THE SEASONS. Translated from the Latin. 12mo. 4s. SOME OF THE 500 POINTS OF GOOD HUSBANDRY AND HUSWIFERY. By THOMAS TUSSER, Gentleman. 12mo. 2s. 6d. BOOKS PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY PARKER. THE PRACTICAL CHRISTIAN'S LIBRARY; A SERIES OF CHEAP PUBLICATIONS, FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION. s. d. LEARN TO DIE. [SUTTON. J ...... 10 PRIVATE DEVOTIONS. [SPINCKES.] . . . . . 16 THE IMITATION OF CHRIST. [a KEMPIS.] . . . . 1 MANUAL OF PRAYER FOR THE YOUNG. [KEN.] . . . . THE GOLDEN GROVE. [TAYLOR.] . . . . . o DAILY EXERCISES. [HORNECK.] ..... LIFE OF AMBROSE BONWICKE LIFE OF BISHOP BULL. [NELSON.] ..... COMPANION TO THE PRAYER BOOK ..... SELECTIONS FROM HOOKER. [KEBLE.] ..... ADVICE TO A FRIEND [PATRICK.] REPENTANCE AND FASTING. [PATRICK.] ON PRAYER. [PATRICK.] ..... 2 PRACTICAL CHRISTIAN, PART I. [SHERLOCK.] . . . . 2 PART II. [SHERLOCK.] .... 2 MEDITATIONS ON THE EUCHARIST. [SUTTON.] .... 2 LEARN TO LIVE. [SUTTON.] ... 1 THE HEART'S EASE. [PATRICK.] ...... l DOCTRINE OF THE ENGLISH CHURCH. [HEYLIN.] . ', HOLY LIVING. [Bp. TAYLOR.] f . .2 HOLY DYING. [Bp. TAYLOR.] . .2 CONFESSIONS OF ST. AUGUSTINE 2 CHEAP BOOKS FOR PAROCHIAL USE. s. Berens' History of the Prayer Book - - 2 Beveridge's Sermons on the Church S Beveridge on the Catechism - l Cotton's Explanation of Obsolete Words in the Bible - - Hammond's Paraenesis, with a Discourse of Heresy in Defence of our Church against the Romanist - 1 Henshaw's Meditations, Miscellaneous, Holy, and Humane - - 1 Laud's Speeches on the Liturgy, &c. - - 2 Le Mesurier's Prayers for the Sick ...... 3 Scandret's Sacrifice the Divine Service - -1 Sherlock on the Catechism ----...0 Sparrow's Rationale on the Book of Common Prayer - - 2 Spelman's Rights of Churches ---.__ l The Seven Penitential Psalms ---._. Vincent of Lerins against Heresy ...... 1 Wilson's Sacra Privata (entire) .... 1 Wilson on the Lord's Supper (ungarbled edition) - - 1 bound, with gilt edges - 1 Winslow's Remains, or the Catholic Churchman in his Life and Death - 4 Wither's Hymns of the Church ..__._ 2 " Select Hymns - . . _ _ . l 14 DAY USE RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED LOAN DEPT. This book is due on the last date stamped below, or on the date to which renewed. Renewed books are subject to immediate recall. lan'63ZL .3 '' NOV2-1966 3 SCIENCES LIB. OCT28 mi DISC DEC 13 M LD 21A-50m-12,'60 (B6221slO)476B General Library University of Calif or Berkeley VC 44821 GENERAL LIBRARY -U.C. BERKELEY BDOOflbS2S7