*» )Qil \INfl-3\W =*3 CC ^ahvmih^ •^ ^imhm^ ' ^ <#■! •JO 5 !* ^lOSANCELfj> %aMiNfi-]\\v ^0FCALIF(% ^Aavaan-T^ ^UIBRARYQ^ ^/OJIWJ-JO^ & ^E-UNIVERS//, ^\1L Ulll YLn0//O .^0FCAIIF(%, y (?Aavaan-^ ,*WE-UNIVERS//, -n i_> V Jj uJNViOr \INIH\W ^OF-CALIFOfi >&AHvaaiH^ 5 '' v /\VJ T UUI 1 J * v^lOSANCELfj> -< smainihwv* ^UIBRARY^ «$UIBRARY0/ ^OJIIVO-JO^ ^/OJIIVDJO^ ^WEUNIVERX^. ^JHDNV-SOV^ ^lOS-ANCELfj^ CO SO SO ^OF-CALIFOBfc, .^0FCALIF(%, ^>. \Y\E-UNIVERS//j » c c THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL ■:>&&& THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL The Ancient Book of Genesis WITH ANALYSIS AND EXPLANATION OF ITS COMPOSITION BY AMOS KIDDER FISKE AUTHOR OF " THE JEWISH SCRIPTURES," ETC., ETC. Nciu ffotfe THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON : MACMILLAN & CO., Ltd. 1897 All rights reserved Copyright, 1897, By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. C » I TCortoooH IprfBS J. S. Cusliing & Co. - Berwick & Smith Norwood Mass. U.S.A. PREFACE Modern critical research into the sources and character of the ancient scriptures of the Hebrews leaves no reasonable doubt that the Book of Gen- esis, which was used as an introduction to the old Jewish law, is a composite production made up largely of myths and fragments of myths em- bodying the conceptions of the earliest writers of Israel, regarding the relations of that people to their deity. Study of it in this aspect gives it a new interest and significance, while persist- ence in the old view of its origin and meaning is in danger of sinking it from reverence to de- rision. This would be a calamity, because no more re- markable production of ancient genius has been preserved to us, and we may well be grateful for the devoutness, even the superstition, which has kept it through the ages from being buried in the special " sacred writings " of a particular race and a " peculiar " faith. So preserved and made V 41 7°30 VI PREFACE widely familiar, by the gloss and glamour of a sanc- tity which concealed or perverted its real mean- ing, it now becomes of extreme interest to the sane student of human development, not only be- cause it contains the early notions of a remark- able race concerning its own origin and destiny, but because within it were planted the first germs of religious conceptions which have grown and expanded through human history and become one of the powerful factors in the gradual elevation of mankind. The moral tone which pervades the Book of Genesis is not high, and the ethical conceptions of the writers were far from exalted ; their ideas of divinity and its working were crude, but, con- sidering the time of the production, the height attained was lofty and luminous amid a vast ex- panse of moral and religious gloom. The great founders of the Jewish faith laid hold upon the eternal principle of "righteousness" in human conduct and of submission to divine law, so far as it is revealed to human intelligence, and sought to give it a potent sanction in the story of their people. The story is mythical, the product of imagina- tion and race pride, but in the compact with Abra- ham and the promise to Jacob was the anchorage PREFACE Vli of a mighty cord upon which hung the law and the prophets, and to which was appended the gospel of love and peace. Surely it is worthy of study in all the candor of broad enlightenment, and such a study the present writer has endeav- ored to give it, hoping to lead others who love light rather than darkness to study it in the same spirit. The text used in this volume is in the main that of the English translation which has been so long familiar, but the two principal versions have been collated with renderings by learned Hebraists, in other languages as well as in Eng- lish, and liberties have been taken here and there where the real meaning could be made clearer, while some obsolete words and phrases have been superseded, as no special sacredness attaches to the phraseology of King James's time. But an effort has been made not to mar the diction, which has become in a sense consecrated by long famil- iarity. The old division of chapter and verse, which is largely arbitrary, has been discarded, and a division according to subject has been adopted, without disturbing the traditional ar- rangement of matter. For the sake of a readier understanding, the comments and explanations have been interspersed viii PREFACE in the form of introductions to the several pas- sages, under new headings. It is the hope of the writer that his labor may contribute to a revival of the study of the oldest of "sacred literature," more intelligent and not less truly devout than that which so long prevailed but which seems to have been dying out because it did not sufficiently appeal to the " common mind " in an age of in- creasing enlightenment. A. K. F. New York, April, 1897. CONTENTS Modern Light on Ancient Scriptures . Material and Composition of the Book of Genesis; I. Earliest Writings of the Hebrews II. Stories of the Patriarchs III. Putative Ancestors of Tribes IV. Origin of the Written Tales V. The First "Sacred History" VI. The Judean Version . VII. Blending the Two Versions VIII. Evidences of Late Origin . PAGE 3 J 7 19 23 2 7 3i 34 37 39 The Tales And Myths: I. The Elohist Account of the Creation II. The Jehovist Story of the First Family III. The Antediluvian Generations . IV. The Mixed Account of the Flood V. Post-diluvian Generations . VI. Abraham takes Possession of the Land VII. Abraham as a Warlike Chief VIII. First Account of the Covenant . IX. First Story of Hagar and Ishmael X. The Elohist Account of the Covenant XL Another Version of the Promise of Isaac XII. The Cities of the Plain and the Family of Lot XIII. Abraham and Abimelech .... 47 54 67 7i 84 93 100 106 no 114 120 123 133 CONTENTS XIV. Second Story of Ilagar and her Son XV. Compact between Abraham and Abimelech XVI. The Story of offering Isaac XVII. The Sacred Burial Place . XVIII. The Story of Rebekah XIX. Varied Progeny of Abraham XX. Isaac and Abimelech . XXI. The Twin Peoples XXII. Jacob's Journey to Syria . XXIII. Jacob's Double Marriage . XXIV. The Birth of Jacob's Sons. XXV. Jacob and Laban — Israel and Syria XXVI. The Division and Treaty . XXVII. Jacob and Esau — Israel and Edom XXVIII. At Shechem — The Story of Dinah XXIX. Bethel and after XXX. Edomite Ethnography XXXI. Joseph and his Brethren . XXXII. Judah and his Family XXXIII. Joseph a Slave and in Prison . XXXIV. Joseph's Elevation to Power XXXV. Joseph's Brothers seek Relief in Egypt XXXVI. The Second Journey to Egypt . XXXVII. Jacob's Migration XXXVIII. Settled in Egypt XXXIX. Strange Results of Famine XL. Adoption of the Tribes of Joseph XLI. Poetical Description of the Tribes XLII. The Burial of Jacob . XLIIL The End of Joseph . The Unknown Homer of hie Hebrews . MODERN LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES MODERN LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES It is more than two hundred years since Rich- ard Simon, the greatest Oriental scholar of his time, in his " Histoire Critique du Vieux Testa- ment," presented the conclusion to which his study had led him, that the so-called " Books of Moses " were put together by the Scribes of the time of Ezra, making free use of older material. He was assailed by the whole Christian world with such a storm of denunciation, that though he defended his position valiantly, and with a wealth of learning and argument to which his assailants were deaf, he was so overwhelmed with sheer abuse that scholarship was practically silenced on the subject for a century. Though silenced, it did not cease its explorations. Among its discoveries was a certain difference in what was palpably the oldest material of the Pentateuch in the use of the name of the deity. There was nothing new in the observation that this name was sometimes Elohim and sometimes 3 4 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Jehovah (Yahweh), but it was found that other marked differences characterized the material in which these terms were severally used in the Book of Genesis and the first chapters of Exodus. The first to set forth these differences in a critical way, and to analyze the material with a view to a clear separation of the component parts, was Dr. Jean Astruc, in the middle of the last century. But such a study of scripture was still so severely discountenanced as to give encouragement rather to the sneering cynicism of Voltaire, than to the conscientious study of devout scholars. It was not until De Wette began to present the results of his study early in the present century in Germany, that real learning and thought upon this most interesting subject gained sufficient hearing to enter upon the career of conquest which the close of the century is likely to accept as a complete triumph. The two greatest workers in the field for a long time were Ewald at Tu- bingen and Reuss at Strasburg. Ewald not only had a vast command of Semitic and Oriental lore, but he shrank from no conclusion to which know- ledge and reason led him, and he had the courage to state and to defend any position at which he arrived. A great deal still depended upon infer- ence from incomplete data, and upon conjectures LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES 5 supported by uncertain indications, and much of what Ewald put forth was subject to later cor- rection. The next great advance was made when Abra- ham Kuenen of Leyden began the publication in 1 86 1 of his history of the origin of the Old Testa- ment books. Other learned scholars were working simultaneously in the same field in Germany and France, notably Noldeke, Schrader, Graf, Kayser, and Reuss, all tending to the same goal. Kuenen in his later work, the " History of the Religion of Israel," benefited by the results of their labor, and modified some of his earlier conclusions. Pro- fessor Edouard Reuss of Strasburg, a Protestant theologian, in his monumental work, " La Bible, Traduction Nouvelle avec Introductions et Com- mentaires," — the result of fifty years devoted to study and labor in this field, — candidly accepted the results of research and of honest reasoning and presented them without reserve. Dillman in his laborious commentaries, though conservative in spirit, and cautious in exegesis, accepted the main facts as to the composition of Genesis and other ancient books without dispute. Francois Lenormant, the French archaeologist, author of "The Beginnings of History," versed as no other man of the present generation has been, perhaps, 6 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL in Chaldean, Syrian, Egyptian, Phoenician, and Hebrew antiquities, and a devout Catholic in his faith, published a translation of " Genesis " in 1883, not only recognizing the composite char- acter of the book, but presenting its component parts distinguished by differences of type. Finally, the late Ernest Renan, in his " Histoire du Peuple d'Israel," — the crowning work of a lifetime devoted to Semitic learning and to the study of the sources of Judaism and Christianity, — having the advantage of all that had been achieved by his forerunners and contemporaries, and applying to his task the powers of a mind of remarkable lucidity and vigor, adopted the con- clusions as to the time and manner of the produc- tion of the literature of the Old Testament with the same confidence with which the author of a new history of the people of Ancient Greece would accept the established conclusions of schol- ars regarding the origin of the early literature of that people. That is practically the attitude on this subject of the present generation of learned theologians and special Biblical scholars on the continent of Europe, of whom the most conspicu- ous representatives are Julius Wellhausen and Bernhardt Stade. It was after the results of the research and LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES / critical acumen of Ewald had become familiar, and the riper fruits of the studies of Reuss, Kue- nen, and Graf had begun to appear, that Bishop Colenso, in the comparative isolation of South Africa, gave evidence that at least one learned English mind, and that within the pale of the church, was open to the truth on this subject and possessed the candor of its scholarship and the courage of its convictions. But so little pre- pared was the English mind in general and the sentiment of the English Church in particular, thirty years ago, for an appreciation of such work, that Colenso encountered treatment which was little short of persecution, and which would have embittered the life of a prelate of less patient and serene a spirit ; but his work on " The Pen- tateuch and the Book of Joshua " has conquered its place in the literature of this subject, and is now acknowledged to be "a monument of sound learning, unwearied industry, and of keen critical insight." The excitement caused by Colenso's writings had scarcely subsided in ecclesiastical circles when Professor William Robertson Smith's con- tributions to the Encyclopaedia Britannica on various Biblical subjects, kindled another, though of much less violence. It was sufficient in the 8 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Presbyterian Church of Scotland to cause his deposition from the professorship of Hebrew at Aberdeen by the General Assembly, but the time had gone by for intolerance toward a scholarship which merely insisted upon telling the truth, and the result for Professor Smith was virtual pro- motion, for his learning and high character won him a place of honor in the teaching body of one of the great universities of England. This country has been singularly slow, not merely in accepting the fruits of investigation into the origin of the Jewish Scriptures, but even in acquiring knowledge of them, and sentiment on the subject seems to be backward and un- formed, rather than actually hostile, save perhaps in ecclesiastical precincts where traditional views are still tenaciously held. One theologian and scholar within the pale of an orthodox denomi- nation who has candidly and fearlessly taught what he has learned has been rewarded with trials for heresy and efforts to depose him from the Seminary which he has persisted in enlighten- ing, but there have been many evidences that public sympathy even in the Church is largely on his side. Nevertheless, few clergymen venture to tell the truth as many of them know or believe it, because of the unpleasant if not damaging LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES 9 consequences which it is likely to bring upon them. It had long seemed to the present writer that it would be an acceptable service for some one in this country who was under no restraint of authority and no prescribed obligations, but ac- countable only to his own intelligence and con- science, to set forth for the common understand- ing - the view of the Old Testament which modern knowledge justifies. He has thought it an ad- vantage that this should be done by one who was not only free from theological preposses- sions, but whose working life had not been ab- sorbed in the special study which is liable to narrow the view and impair the sense of pro- portion. It would be a rare gift if one who had devoted years to close research and a profound study of details should be able to present the broad general results attractively to the unlearned reader. In short, the present writer had the pre- sumption to consider himself particularly qualified to do just what he thought ought to be done and what he has attempted to do in his little work upon "The Jewish Scriptures." Now he undertakes, perhaps with still greater presumption, to present one example of the an- cient Hebrew books, so analyzed and examined 10 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL as to demonstrate the manner of its production, and, as it seems to him, convincingly to justify the general view which he has taken of the whole collection. Among the conclusions which he takes as established beyond further dispute are these : The first six books of the Old Tes- tament — the Pentateuch and Book of Joshua, or the Hexateuch — which embody the ancient cove- nants and the Jewish law, were put into their present form after the return from the exile in Babylon, when the Levitical system of the sec- ond temple was developed. The code which constitutes the bulk of the Book of Leviticus, but parts of which are reiterated in the last chapters of Exodus and scattered through Num- bers and Joshua, was then formulated, and woven somewhat crudely into the old narratives of the early history of the people, which were modified and adapted for the purpose, especially the last sixteen chapters of Exodus and consid- erable passages in Numbers. The Book of Deu- teronomy, which was included in the " Torah," contained the statement of the law, which was put in form in the time of Josiah's reforms, and which the High Priest, Hilkiah, pretended to have found in the temple. The old primitive or " Sacred " history of the people was used as LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES 1 1 the framework of narrative for the entire system of prescriptions and requirements, and of laws and ordinances for restored Judaism, which it was the special purpose of the priests and Scribes to consecrate. This Sacred History had been compiled in the time of Hezekiah, after the fall of Samaria, and near the end of the eighth century B.C., mainly from two older ver- sions, one of which had been produced in the Northern Kingdom, and the other at Jerusalem, from half a century to a century before. This material constitutes the bulk of the Book of Genesis and the first part of Exodus, and is traceable in fragments through the other books. In regard to the matters dealt with in the present volume, there is now little dispute among candid scholars, so far as the main facts are concerned. The chief differences ,of opinion, even among theologians of real learning, relate to what they call the "divine element" working through human means and agencies toward an ultimate result. The present writer has no dis- pute with those who contend for this " divine ele- ment," and who indulge in controversies as to its extent and potency. He acknowledges a divine element in all humanity, a divine energy work- ing in all human history, as it wrought in the 12 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL development of the physical universe before human history began. He has no doubt of a divine power in the mighty ethical and religious development of the ancient Hebrews, in the beautiful aesthetic development of the ancient Greeks, in the development of the capacity for organization and government in the ancient Romans, and in the combination and inter-working of these factors under the blending influence of Christianity in modern civilization. Equally divine to his mind is the extension of knowledge through science, research, reasoning, and philosophy in these latter times, correcting the errors of the past, and clearing the eternal verities from the incrustations of ignorance and super- stition. It is no less a sacred duty to accept the truth as it is revealed now, than to accept so much 06 it as may have been contained in what was "said by them of old time." "The eternal years of God " are on the side of truth, and time was never so old and so laden with wis- dom as it is to-day. Divine revelation has not been confined to one age or one people, and it never employed human elements and human agencies with more effect than at present. In analyzing and explaining the Book of Gene- sis the writer has pursued the same method in LIGHT ON ANCIENT SCRIPTURES 13 detail which he followed in a broad general way in dealing with the whole Old Testament collec- tion. He has studied the work of others with a view to enlightening himself, and then he has studied the production in hand by the light which he has gained. He has not summarized what others have said or discussed their conclusions, and he has felt entirely free to think for himself and present the views which he has reached. The one claim he makes is that of sincerity of purpose and a desire to serve the cause of truth, which is everlasting and always divine. MATERIAL AND COMPOSITION OF THE BOOK OF GENESIS EARLIEST WRITINGS OF THE HEBREWS It is a matter of inference from a variety of indications how early in the history of the an- cient Hebrews writing came into use among them. Their language was substantially the same as that of the other Semitic peoples about them, including the Canaanite tribes which they had subjugated, and which were akin to them in ori- gin, and their alphabet was derived from their neighbors on the northwest, the Phoenicians. It must have been late in the period of the "Judges," from eleven to twelve centuries before the Chris- tian era, and two or three centuries, at least, after the invasion of the country of the Canaanites, when the language was reduced to written form, and there is no trace of literary production in that form before the time of David, unless it be found in the statement that the prophet Samuel made a record of the manner of setting up the first king- dom, a statement which is contained in an account compiled long after the event. The first writings of which we have any actual trace were those which embodied the traditions c 17 1 8 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL of the escape from bondage in Egypt and the struggle for the possession of the land occupied at the time the writings were made. These tra- ditions had been preserved by oral repetition, as was common everywhere in primitive times, until they could be gathered up in a more enduring vehicle of transmission. The " Book of the Wars of Jehovah " and the "Book of Jasher" — whether these were indepen- dent productions or parts of one collection cannot be clearly determined from the scanty references — were the first receptacle of the legends con- nected with the invasion and conquest of Canaan, and the conflicts which preceded the establishment of the Kingdom. The lament of David over the death of Saul and Jonathan is said by the compiler of the Book of Samuel to be written in the " Book of Jasher," which indicates, at least, that the col- lection had not been closed when David became the King of Judah. This collection of the tra- ditions of Israel's heroic age appears to have furnished much of the material or many of the suggestions for the narratives of the Books of Judges and Samuel, and for some of the episodes of the escape from Egypt and the conquest of Canaan, including those of the late and artificial account of Joshua's exploits. II STORIES OF THE PATRIARCHS It is pretty clear that it was after the division of the Kingdom and the establishment of Jero- boam as the first ruler of the Northern realm that the ethnic myths, known as the " Stories of the Patriarchs," first appeared. It has been com- mon, even for those who admit that their original production could not have been earlier than that time, to assume that they were based upon traditions of the Nomadic days before the migration into Egypt, preserved from generation to generation by oral transmission, but that is extremely doubtful. Considering the variety of ethnic and mythic mean- ings still traceable in these tales and their many points of contact with the relations, purposes, and ideas of the time and place of their production, it is more likely that they were the imaginative offspring of the genius of that time and place. The aspects of Nomadic life were still familiar in the neighboring plains on the east, and the Nomadic instinct of the Hebrews was always yearning for its freedom and simplicity. It in- 19 20 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL spired the ideals which determined their aspira- tions and rendered them weak as an organized nationality. And yet, there is no clear evidence that they carried memories or definite traditions of their own Nomadic days through the dark bondage in Egypt and the long struggle from the deliverance to the conquest. The impress of the infant days of their race was" indelible ; the tendency then begotten never died, and there were, no doubt, cherished associations of name and place that survived through ages of trial, but the actual persons and deeds of their ancestry were utterly forgotten. When their first writers began to supply this lack by their own creations, the two kingdoms of Judah and Ephraim, the latter monopolizing the ancient name of Israel, were at the height of the antipathy engendered by the division of the first kingdom, and were engaged in their earliest rivalry as separate nations, with Ephraim the stronger and more confident. Being the immedi- ate neighbor of Phoenicia and having as its ruler a man of uncommon ability and energy, who had enjoyed the advantage of a long sojourn in Egypt under the favor of the monarch of that country, Ephraim entered upon a period of intellectual and literary activity of which Judah, under the STORIES OF THE PATRIARCHS 21 feeble and reactionary reign of Rehoboam, the son of Solomon, showed no sign. It was at this time, in the Kingdom of the North, that the patri- archal stories first appeared. They are usually spoken of as a collection, but they seem to have formed a series with no clear sequence or cohe- rency, and they underwent variations which in time produced different versions. If we recall the situation of the time we shall find the Kingdom of Israel (Ephraim) in the first flush of its pride and power, with a sense of superiority over Judah, mingled with a degree of fraternal enmity ; with a kindly feeling toward Egypt, and friendly relations with Syria, and with a scorn for the subjugated tribes of Canaan. Associated with Ephraim was the closely related tribe of Manasseh and the North- ern provinces, which had names that were rather territorial than tribal, and there was a disposi- tion to detach from Judah, the warlike com- munity of Benjamin, which lay on the division line, and which had furnished the first king of all Israel, whose dynasty had been cut short by David. There were rooted enmities for the Edomites and Moabites, which were common to all the tribes, and had been inherited from the time of 22 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL the long struggle through the deserts on the way to the conquest of the land of the Canaan- ites, for the hostile spirit of those peoples had added to the length and the hardships of the struggle. There had been many a conflict with the Ammonites who were akin to Moab, and with the predatory Amalekites of the South, and these also were rated as hereditary enemies. The dominant sentiment of Israel was pride of race and a sense of superiority, though the ancient relationship of the Semitic peoples of the whole region from the " Great River " to the sea, and to the " River of Egypt," including the Ishmael- ites and Midianites of the Arabian desert, was acknowledged, save that the subjugated and de- spised Canaanites were cut off from that noble stock. The victims of conquest and of the sen- timent engendered by it, were relegated to an inferior origin, and ejected from the family in which they were born. Knowledge of the great eastern Empire of the Tigris and Euphrates was imperfect and somewhat vague, and all beyond to the east and north, was mystery. There was a tradition that the Hebrews — a name that signified " from beyond " — had origi- nally migrated from the northern plains of Meso- potamia ( Paddan-aram). Ill PUTATIVE ANCESTORS OF TRIBES Abram, or Abraham, was a revered name among all the Semitic peoples, and the Syrians, Arabians, and Phoenicians, as well as the He- brews, had their separate lines of tradition con- necting with it. It even figured in the fabulous history of the Chaldaeans. When the Israelites began to produce their ethnic myths, explain- ing and glorifying their origin, their superior- ity, and their special claim to the land of which they had taken possession, and to exalt their God above all other deities, they appropriated as peculiarly their own the fatherhood of Abraham and relegated to an inferior position all the other reputed progeny of Terah, who had come from the mysterious land of "Ur of the Chaldees." The Ishmaelites and Midianites were allowed to be of a direct descent from Abraham, but in an inferior sense. A close relation was permitted to the Edomites, but they were humiliated to a sec- ondary place. The Syrians were set off on a collateral branch as descendants of Abraham's 23 24 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL brother Nahor, while the hated Moabites and Ammonites were placed on another line with the stamp of death and incest on their origin. The Israelites alone were of the pure strain of Abram, the " high father," who became Abraham, the "father of many," the favored offspring of Sarai ("the princess"), doubly sanctified by divine prom- ise and by birth in her old age, after a long life of barrenness. There were traditions of an ancient branch of the Hebrew family on the Philistine border in the south, about the old fane of Beersheba, or the Seven wells. This had died out, and the tradi- tions were dim, but the name of Isaac ("laughter") remained, and the Beersheba region, though in the south, was associated much more closely with Ephraim than with Judah. The general name for the Hebrew tribes in their union had been Israel from a time that is immemorial now, if it was not then. Many writers assume that it ante- dated the Egyptian bondage. According to the generally accepted etymology it meant " warrior of God." The Hebrews were not essentially a warlike people, and they could hardly have given themselves that title in the Nomadic days. It more probably sprang out of the one era in their history, when they were nerved to desperate ANCESTORS OF THE TRIBES 25 battle for the possession of a country which they claimed by inheritance and divine promise, and when their deity became a " God of battles." It is more likely that Israel was adopted as a general title by a people engaged in a war of conquest, than by one roaming about with flocks and herds, or dwelling in servitude in a foreign land. Jacob was a poetical designation for the same people, and used only in rhetorical language. It was derived from a word meaning " heel," and was applied to one who supplanted or superseded another. There is no indication of its use before the tribes were established as a nation, and its adoption probably had reference rather to the crushing or supplanting of the Canaanites than to any relation with the comparatively remote Edomites. The dominant tribes of the Northern Kingdom were poetically designated as Joseph, the double derivation of which may have a spe- cial significance. It is explained as meaning both taking from and adding to. It may imply an original joining to the other tribes, or a separation from them in their later history, and it was used with apparent reference to both senses. There were traditions of a tribe or branch of the Hebrew people which had settled in the south under the name of Simeon, but which had faded out, and 26 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL of two that had remained to the east of the Jor- dan after the conquest, designated as Reuben and Gad, which had also lost their distinct identity. There was a class of persons scattered over the country, and wandering from place to place, asso- ciated chiefly with the oracles and shrines of wor- ship, and known as sons of Levi, that being a general term borrowed from Egypt for those who served at altars. Most tribal and territorial names in those days had some meaning derived from characteristics of the people, or of the country which they occupied, or from some incident in their history, though derivations were frequently assumed from the superficial resemblance of proper names to words in common use, with which they had really no etymological relation. Both tribal and territorial names were often personified, and taking posses- sion of a land was sometimes represented as the marriage of a man bearing the name of the tribe with a woman bearing the name of the country, while clans and provinces figured as their children. IV ORIGIN OF THE WRITTEN TALES Jeroboam had established his seat of power at Shechem, which had been the scene of the turbu- lent effort of Abimelech, the son of Gideon, to make himself king. Near by was Shiloh, where it was said that the Ark of the Covenant had long "rested," and where the priests had received their offerings and made their sacrifices in the old days, but the temple at Jerusalem had become a centre of worship, and Jeroboam deemed it expedient to establish his principal altar farther away. He placed it on the height at Bethel, which, under the name of Luz, had been a sacred place of the Canaanites, and sought to make it attractive by symbols of worship similar to those of Egypt. The material for the stories of the patriarchs existed in the names of places, of nations, tribes, and clans, in the various characteristics of these and their relations with each other, and in tradi- tions of events and circumstances to many of which we have found no tangible clue. Their 2 7 28 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL chief motive was to exalt Israel and degrade its enemies, to trace its possession of the country to divine promise and divine aid, and to explain, in a manner that glorified rather than degraded it, the falling into Egyptian slavery. Incidentally, in their development they were made to impress lessons and warnings relating to the ethics and religion of the time of their production. In outline, the ancestral story was that the father of Abraham had wandered from the remote and mysterious land of " Ur of the Chaldees " in the East and settled in Aram of the rivers (Paddan-aram). There the brother of Abraham, Nahor (that being the name of a place), had be- come the ancestor of Syria, and another brother, Haran (also the name of a place), had died. With his wife Sarah (princess) and his orphaned nephew (Lot), Abraham went into the land of Canaan, where he was to become the progenitor of many peoples, and the specially sanctified ancestor of the Israelites, and where the nephew was to become the forefather of the Moabites and Ammonites on the other side of the lower Jordan and in the region beyond the Dead Sea. Abraham took possession of the land by pass- ing through it and setting up altars at Shechem and Bethel and at Beersheba, and went on into ORIGIN OF THE WRITTEN TALES 29 Egypt, where the divine care over his life was exhibited. The Judean version of the story asso- ciated him especially with Hebron, the first scene of David's royalty, where his possession of the land was consecrated by purchasing a permanent burial place. The name of "Isaac," associated with the Beersheba region, was given to the son of Abra- ham's old age, and for him a wife of the blood of his father's family was obtained, and from that union came Jacob, who married in Syria and begat the heads of all the tribes. Joseph was a favorite son and had been carried captive to Egypt, as the result of the envy and spite of his brothers, there to be exalted to power and to be- come the saviour of the family. In filling in this outline with a variety of details the first writers took occasion to explain in the forms of personal story not only the separation of Lot from Abraham and the opprobrious origin of Moab and Ammon, but the elimination from the heritage of the chosen people of Ishmael and Edom and the birth of Midian and the kindred people of the desert. They undertook to account for the division of possessions with Syria in the northeast and with the Philistines of the south- west, and to explain the origin of the " Cove- nants," which were assumed to be the peculiar 30 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL bond between the people of Israel and their God, and the basis of their worship and their sacred law. How much of this kind of literature may originally have existed in oral form, and how much may have been altogether lost in the pro- cess of preservation in writing, we have no means of knowing, but we can plainly see that what was preserved became wrought into a marvellous patchwork. The seams are still visible and the colors do not entirely harmonize, but the effect produced has been deeper and more lasting than that of any other creation of human genius in its pristine vigor. V THE FIRST " SACRED HISTORY " The most striking single embodiment of the early Hebrew genius appeared in the writer who produced the first "sacred history" of the " peculiar people." He was of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, and his time, as nearly as it can be determined, was that of the reign of Jehu, at Samaria, in the middle of the ninth century B.C., when the spirit of "prophecy" was first awakened, and a fierce conflict was waged against the tendency to lapse into the ways and the worship of Phoenicia, to which a strong impulse had been given in the days of Ahab, when the Tyrian queen Jezebel exercised so much influence. This writer, whose name and identity are lost in the mists of antiquity, was contemporary with the mysterious personality be- hind the legendary names of Elijah and Elisha, and it is a fascinating conjecture that he may have been identical with that personality. His main purpose was to lay down rules of 31 32 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL conduct and requirements of worship for the people of Israel, and to give these the most solemn and impressive sanction. This sanction was to be derived from the covenants of Jeho- vah with the ancestors of the people and his promises to their posterity, and to be confirmed by the deliverance from Egyptian bondage and the possession of the land of Canaan in fulfil- ment of promise. The worship of Jehovah was to be exalted and sanctified and made a matter of such terrible obligation as to be a bulwark against the enticements of Baal and Astarte ("Ashtoreth"). This writer had some familiarity with the fables of Babylon and Nineveh, and with the mythology of Phoenicia, and he began his story with the creation of the world and the origin of the human race, deriving his material from those foreign sources, but giving it the impress of his own potent genius. He made large use of the legends already existing in written form, of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the sons of Jacob, develop- ing and varying them to suit his purpose, and he used, in a continuance of his history after the period of Egyptian bondage, material from the " wars of Jehovah," and traditions of Moses, Miriam, and Aaron, and the trials of the long THE FIRST SACRED HISTORY 33 journey through the wilderness, blending these elements into a narrative which had a certain epic grandeur. So much as has been preserved of the pro- duction of this Northern writer forms what is called the Jehovist material in the Hexateuch, and from it a considerable part of the Book of Genesis was derived. The term Jehovist (or "Yahwist")is employed because the writer used the name Jehovah, or Yahweh, for the deity, that being the name in common use at the time, which was assumed to have been first adopted in the wilderness, when Moses had just rescued the peo- ple from their servitude within the borders of Egypt and was rallying them to the tremendous effort of making their way to the possession of the promised land. VI THE JUDEAN VERSION It was but a few years after the time of the Jehovist that the writer known as the Elohist put forth at Jerusalem the Judean version of the " Sacred History." Such of his work as has been preserved is known as the Elohist material, or from the " Elohist document," because he used the word "Elohim " for the deity down to the point in the narrative at which the appellation of Jeho- vah was said to have been revealed to Moses. There had been as yet no such religious ferment in Judah as had been going on in the Northern Kingdom, and the prophetic spirit had not begun that vigorous development which culminated in Isaiah. Writing had been mainly devoted to genealogies and rude annals, and the Elohist was rather of the priests than the prophets. He was familiar with the common traditions of the Hebrew people, and with some of the stories which had sprung up around the names of the tribes, and had some knowledge of the fabulous lore of Babylon and Assyria. He had much 34 THE JUDEAN VERSION 35 less familiarity than the Northern writer with the learning of Egypt, and possessed little of the creative faculty of the Jehovist, his form of state- ments being more prosaic. He began with an account of the creation, derived from the Chal- dean cosmogony, but it had rather the quality of an infantile science than of a poetic mythology. The Chaldean division of time into periods of seven days, fourths of the lunar month, and the Assyrian practice of devoting the seventh day to rest and worship had come into vogue, and this writer sought to give it a special sanctity in his description of the creation. He it was who em- bodied the "decalogue" in his narrative, and in it consecrated the Sabbath as the day on which the Lord rested after creating " heaven and earth and sea and all that in them is." When this little code in a somewhat different form was incor- porated in the law in Jeremiah's day, the Sabbath was hallowed in remembrance of the deliverance from Egyptian bondage. Both the Jehovist and the Elohist adopted with some variation the Babylonian story of the de- struction of mankind by a universal flood, and the latter endeavored to fill the intervals between the creation and the flood, and between the flood and the migration of Abraham, with regular gene- 36 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL alogies, or " generations," of the families of the earth before Israel was born, using for the purpose the geographical names within his knowledge. In fact, the Elohist's work was largely genea- logical and ethnographical, and he made scanty use of the patriarchal stories. The Northern ver- sions of them were probably unknown to him, and he did not have the genius for developing such tales which the writer of Ephraim possessed. He was more intent upon tracing religious customs to an ancient origin, and it was he who sanctified circumcision as the seal of the covenant with Abraham. The practice was neither religious nor Israelite in its origin, but the Israelites had brought it into the land of Canaan, and there insisted upon its sacredness as a badge of their separation from all other peoples, and made it the most rigidly observed rite of their peculiar faith. VII BLENDING THE TWO VERSIONS After the fate of Samaria in 721 B.C., such of the literary treasures of the Kingdom of Is- rael as were fortunately preserved were added to those of Judah, which had been accumulat- ing at Jerusalem, and a few years later, during the active and productive period of the reign of Hezekiah, some writer, probably of the tem- ple scribes, undertook to combine into one, the two versions of the sacred history. He appears to have had other material at his command, and did not refrain altogether from injecting state- ments of his own. He was by no means a skilful or painstaking compiler, and he preferred copying and piecing together his material to recomposing it into a new and harmonious nar- rative, and even when he attempted to modify a statement of his predecessors, he often did it so clumsily as to leave evidence of inconsist- ency. This writer had the Judean point of view, and was accustomed to the use of Jehovah (or Yahweh) 37 38 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL as the name of the Deity ; but the shorter Elohist document was the basis of his compilation, so far as it went, and where he pieced passages of the other into it he made no changes in the divine name. Where he had two versions of the same proceeding, he usually adopted one in preference to the other, but sometimes he undertook to combine them in order to save dif- ferent details, and sometimes where they varied rather widely he used both, as if they referred to different proceedings. Occasionally he intro- duced fragments of material quite independent of his two main documents, and formed connect- ing links of narrative of his own. That so much of the Northern production was preserved, notwithstanding its exaltation of Ephra- im and disparagement of Judah, was due in part to the perfunctory manner of the compiler, and in part, no doubt, to the softening of old antipa- thies after the calamities of Israel and the de- struction of Samaria, and to the hope that was now cherished of the ultimate reunion of the tribes under one king of the house of David. VIII EVIDENCES OF LATE ORIGIN There is little evidence that, during the in- terval between the compilation of this sacred history and the taking of Jerusalem by the Babylonians, its contents had become familiar even to the prophets and writers of the period. One of the strongest evidences that the oldest material in the narrative was later than the time of Solomon, and was unfamiliar until after the captivity, is to be found in the absence of all allusion to what it embodies in the other writings of the time of the kingdoms. In the books of Judges, Samuel, and Kings there is no sign of a knowledge of the venerable ancestors of the race, or even of Moses and his " law," save for the latter in passages of the later annals distinctly traceable to redaction after the exile. Not only is there no sign of such knowledge, but the whole tone and spirit of the narratives and the character of their contents are inconsistent with its existence. In the later literature we meet with the names Israel and Jacob and 39 40 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Joseph, as well as Ephraim and Judah, in their general national application, but with no refer- ence to such personalities as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the sons of Jacob. The prayer put in the mouth of Solomon at the dedication of the temple by the late compiler of the annals of his reign, is anachronistic and out of keeping with the character, but while it con- tains repeated appeals to the "God of Israel," there is no recognition of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In the strange passage which represents the prophet Elijah as praying to Jeho- vah in competition with the prophets of Baal, he invokes the "God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Israel," but elsewhere in the annals, from the conquest to the doom of the kingdom, these venerable names do not appear, and the appear- ance of this phrase in the story of Elijah reminds us of the coincidence of time and similarity of character in the production of the Jehovist docu- ment and the legend of the prophet of Carmel. The phrases, "the posterity (or seed) of Abra- ham, Isaac, and Jacob" and "the covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob," are common in the Book of Deuteronomy, and the former appears once in the writings of Jeremiah, who was almost certainly associated with the production of that EVIDENCES OF LATE ORIGIN 41 book, at a time when the literature of the temple already contained the "sacred history" as it had been compiled in the days of Hezekiah. Isaiah used the names Abraham and Jacob only in the ethnic sense, and the former occurs only once in the writings of the first, or real, Isaiah. He shows no knowledge of the patriarchs of Israel. Micah uses the name of Abraham once, but in the strictly ethnic sense. Hosea alone of the prophets shows some evidence of familiarity with the legend of Jacob, but he was of the Northern Kingdom, and near the time of the legend's origin. Amos, who dwelt near the Beersheba region, where the Isaac tradition prevailed, is the only one to use that name even in its ethnic sense before the captivity, save in the phrase of Jeremiah already referred to. The conclusion is irresistible that nothing was known, in the land of Israel, of the patriarchs, or of the stories in which their names figure, until after the period which is now assigned by learned critics for the production of those stories, and that knowledge of the Sacred History in which they were incorporated was confined to a small class until after the captivity, when the books of the law were promulgated. There is no trace of an oral tradition of the personalities or the families of the so-called ancestors of the Israelites during 42 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL the long period anterior to the division of the kingdom, and the development of written litera- ture, and if it had existed it could hardly have escaped some passing allusion. The use of per- sonal names to designate tribes or bands, and the putting of tribal history into the form of personal story, were common everywhere in primitive times, especially among Oriental peoples. The Israel- ites usually spoke of the people of a land as the children of the land, and the Hittites, a much older people than themselves, were called the children of Heth, Heth being assumed to be the name of an ancient personage. There is a curi- ous illustration of the practice of the first writers in personifying tribes in their ordinary language, at the beginning of the Book of Judges, where, several generations after the era assigned to Jacob's family, "Judah said unto Simeon his brother, ' come up with me into my lot, that we may fight against the Canaanites, and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot.' So Simeon went with him." Apparently the Book of Genesis underwent little change after the compilation in the time of Hezekiah. It must have been among the literary treasures of the temple, which were carried from Jerusalem to Babylon and preserved through the EVIDENCES OF LATE ORIGIN 43 captivity, and after the return it was made the first section of the Torah, as containing the an- cient covenants upon which the early writers had based the law in its rudimentary form.. It needed little change to adapt it to the purpose. It was designated only by its opening words, and the present title was first attached to it in the Greek version of the Pentateuch known as the Septua- gint. The circumstances and method of its pro- duction make it the most compact and remarkable repository of the first conceptions of primitive genius that has been preserved in human history. The seal of sacredness put upon it by the doctors of Judaism deterred for ages all attempt at an analysis of its composition, but the daring of mod- ern scholarship has at last resolved it into its elements. THE TALES AND MYTHS THE ELOHIST ACCOUNT OF THE CREATION The compiler, as we shall call the writer who in the time of Hezekiah wrought the "Sacred His- tory " out of materials furnished by his prede- cessors, began with the Elohist's account of the creation, which occupies the first chapter and the first three verses of the second chapter of Genesis, as it came to be divided long afterwards. The author of this knew something of the Chaldean fable on the subject. It is not necessary to assume that this knowledge came through long tradition from the time when the Semitic tribes wandered as Nomads on the borders of Mesopotamia, for there was not an absolute lack of communication with that land in the writer's own day. The system of six days for labor and the seventh for rest was of Chaldean origin, had long been in use in Assyria, and was already established in Judah. The account of the creation was made to give a special sanction to the observance of the Sabbath, which had come to be a requirement of the religion of the temple. Otherwise, there is an 47 48 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL infantile simplicity in the quasi science of the description, in marked contrast with the mystical tendency of the Jehovist writer. The infantile simplicity of the writer's concep- tion of the physical universe is manifest in every phase of the six days' work of creation. He con- ceives first of the earth as a mass of water welter- ing in darkness, and of the appearance of light and the alternation of day and night in advance of the existence of the luminaries that were to rule the day and night and determine the seasons. His notion of the firmament was that of a solid barrier holding a mass of water above the earth, forming the reservoir of rain and storms. The same general idea appears in the Book of Job and some of the older Psalms, writings of sub- stantially the same age as this. In order to keep to the six days for labor two processes are crowded into the third day. The dry land is made to appear by the simple process of gathering the waters that were left below the firmament into one place, which hardly conforms to any real physical geography, and then vege- tation is brought forth in advance of the creation of the sun with its vivifying influences. The classification into grass assumed to be seedless, plants that bear seed, and fruit trees, is of the ELOHIST ACCOUNT OF CREATION 49 most primitive order. The sun, moon, and stars are created after there have been three alterna- tions of night and day, and after the earth has been clothed with vegetation. A day is devoted to the production of the denizens of the water and the air, and on the sixth day the animals that occupy the earth are brought into being and roughly classified as cattle, reptiles, and beasts. Then comes the crowning work of man's creation in the image of God. This was strictly according to the anthropomorphic conception of the ancient He- brews. Other divinities might have the likeness of beasts, but their deity had the semblance and qualities of an exalted man. The exaltation was so sublimated as to make it the height of pre- sumption to provoke comparison by material representations of God. Hence the aversion not only to idols, but to all portrayals of the human form. The account closes with assigning the grass or "green herb" to the animals for suste- nance, and the cereal plants and fruit of trees to man. In the mind of this writer there was no eating of flesh in the infant days of the world. It is needless to say that the physical science of this account is the fancy of a primitive age, and bears no relation to the actual origin of 50 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL things. But the real significance of the produc- tion lies in its embodiment of an exalted con- ception of the almightiness of God, who wrought all things out of nothing by the mere exercise of his will, and in the acceptance of the work of God as altogether good. The sublimity of this conception of monotheism so glorifies the account of creative processes that we lose sight of the crude absurdities of the details. [I-II 4I In the beginning God [Elohim] created the heaven and the earth. The earth was waste and void ; and darkness brooded upon the face of the deep ; and the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light : and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good ; and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was an even- ing and a morning, one day. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament : and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was an evening and a morning, a second day. ELOHIST ACCOUNT OF CREATION 51 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, that the dry land may appear : and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth ; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas : and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let the earth put forth grass, herb yielding seed, and fruit tree bearing fruit after its kind, wherein is the seed thereof, upon the earth : and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, herb yielding seed after its kind, and tree bearing fruit, wherein is the seed thereof, after its kind ; and God saw that it was good. And there was an even- ing and a morning, a third day. And God said, Let there be lights in the firma- ment of the heaven to divide the day from the night ; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years ; and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth : and it was so. And God made the two great lights ; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night ; he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness ; and God saw that it was good. And there was an evening and a morning, a fourth day. And God said, Let the waters bring forth abun- dantly the moving creature that hath life, and let fowl fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created the great sea-monsters, 52 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kinds, and every winged fowl after its kind ; and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. And there was an evening and a morning, a fifth day. And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after its kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after its kind ; and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth after its kind, and the cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the ground after its kind ; and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness ; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. And God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him ; male and female created he them. And God blessed them ; and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it ; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed ; to you it shall be for food ; and to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl ELOHIST ACCOUNT OF CREATION 53 of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for food : and it was so. And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And there was an evening and a morn- ing, the sixth day. And the heaven and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished his work which he had made ; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and hallowed it, because that in it he rested from all his work which God had created and made. [These are the generations of the heaven and of the earth when they were created.] II THE JEHOVIST STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY If the Jehovist gave any account of the creation of the earth, it was omitted by the compiler, who apparently interpolated the statement " these are the generations of the heaven and of the earth," with reference to what precedes and for the purpose of connecting the two fragments. He left traces of a radical difference of view as to the origin of things, for where the Elohist represents the land as emerging from a waste of waters, the Jehovist assumes an arid waste of land in need of rain to make it fruitful. The latter's conceptions were more mythological in quality and he was evidently more familiar with Babylonian and Phoenician fable, which he used in a fragmentary way and transmuted with the touch of an original genius. The peculiarly anthropomorphic character of his conception of the deity is evident throughout. In- stead of the mysterious Elohim bringing all things into being by the fiat of his will, we have the Yah- weh who forms man out of the dust of the ground and breathes into him the spirit of life. He plants a garden and places the man in it to dress and 54 STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY 55 keep it. Out of the ground he makes the trees to grow for the delight of the eye and to furnish food, and out of the ground he forms the birds and beasts, after he has made man from the dust, and brings them to man to receive their names. Woman he creates to be man's helpmeet by tak- ing of his substance and moulding it (" building" in the original) into her form. It is a story-book account of making living things. In it there are suggestions of primitive deriva- tion. The notion that man came from the dust and returned to the dust was prevalent in the Hebrew philosophy, and an etymological relation was assumed between adam, the general term for man, and adamah, earth. Hence the making of man from the dust of the ground. Such a relation did exist between is, man, in the special sense of "vir" as distinguished from "homo," and issah, woman. Hence the making of woman from the substance of man, in conformity with the saying already proverbial, bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh. The saying that a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife can seem appropriate in a being who has had no father and mother and beholds a woman for the first time, only as a mythical embodiment of general truths concerning human society. 56 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL The word "Eden" meant rather a place or con- dition of delight than a special location, and the matter-of-fact description with reference to the rivers of the primitive world (in brackets below) is an interpolation of the compiler. The Hiddekel was the Tigris, but the rivers Pishon and Gihon, which were made to compass the regions of the East and South, correspond to no actual streams. In the writer's imperfect geography the names may have stood for remote rivers of which he had only a vague notion. The mythic significance of the story of the first human couple was lost for ages through a perver- sion of its meaning to serve the ends of a dogma wrought in perfect good faith by the early teachers of Christianity. It symbolizes the infancy of the race as a state of childhood, in the innocence and delight of " Eden," unconscious of either good or evil, knowing neither wisdom nor folly, caring not for its nakedness. But it cannot remain in its "clouds of glory." The unhappy time comes for the stirring of the insidious desire for knowledge of good and evil and the impulse to liberty of action. That suggestion of developing human nature is symbolized in the serpent popularly credited with subtlety and wisdom among animals by the ancients. STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY 57 The stirring and yearning of that time of change comes sooner in woman than in man, and she is apt to afford the incitement and stimulus to it in him; and, when it comes, the state- of guileless innocence is ended. With the knowledge of good and evil comes the consciousness of shame in nakedness. On that day, too, comes death, — not literally, but in apprehension and sense of cer- tainty, and man is turned out of his garden of delight to face the toil of life and woman to meet the pain and sorrow of motherhood. But why was the eating of the fruit forbidden ? Is there not in this an expression of sadness that man should persist in knowing and doing for him- self, and so incur the penalties of achievement, and of a divine solicitude that he might remain innocent and happy and forever a child? Once tasting of knowledge and coming to the choice of good and evil, he is debarred from the tree that would furnish the antidote to the bitter penalty. The cherubim and a flaming sword guard the domain of innocent childhood which he has left. In this symbolizing of a universal truth in human nature and human life there is no suggestion of individual sin or even of general sin. There is no suggestion of a spirit of evil in the serpent, but his supposed subtlety as a beast is used to figure the 58 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL first awakening of the desire for knowledge of good and evil; and the antipathy between him and man is attributed to a primal curse. When the strangely man-like God walks in the garden the shrinking from his presence is not from a sense of guilt, but of nakedness. The sad turn has come in human life and character when nudity implies shame. " Who told thee that thou wast naked ? " The doctrine of original sin, of the fall from a state of perfection, and the loss of an immortal condition, was never drawn from this myth by the Jews, because it was not embodied in it by their genius. It was not in keeping with their ideas, and the story was really an allegory of the growth and not the fall of man, — an expression of human development and not of relapse. The later doc- trine was laboriously wrought to serve as the basis of another, — that of the redemption of a fallen race, whose fall was thus accounted for. The Cain and Abel myth is separate from that of Adam and Eve, and had in part the purpose of illustrating the tendency of the human race to violence and bloodshed. The innocent offspring of the first couple was destroyed and the depraved and vengeful was sent forth into the land of wander- ing (Nod) to people the world alone. There is a curious naivete in the assumption that it already STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY 59 contained people from whom he needed protection and among whom he must have found the wife that bore Enoch, which was the name of a city- still known in the time of the writer. Incidently this story is used to enforce the idea that the " firstlings of the flock and the fat thereof," rather than the "fruit of the ground," were the proper and accepted " offering unto the Lord " ; and it contains the undeveloped germ of the primitive division of human occupations into tilling the soil and caring for flocks, and gives a sort of sanctity to the latter as having been that of the forefathers of Israel. The obscure traces of myth in the brief passage relating to Cain's descendants are from a Phoeni- cian source, and bear upon the supposed origin of pastoral people and of artificers of tools and weapons, and of musical instruments, the sole products of primitive mechanical skill. Tubal- Cain and Naamah are believed to have had a remote relationship to Vulcan and Venus, but the material, of which the words of Lamech to his wives appear to be an ancient rhythmical frag- ment, was used so sparingly as to leave the whole passage in obscurity. The statement as to the birth of Seth does not belong to the Jehovist document, but was drawn by the compiler from 60 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL the Elohist to supply the place of Abel, and to connect this with the passage which follows in the compilation. The assumed etymology of the name is fanciful. The Jehovist knew no Seth and the Elohist no Cain and Abel. [iU-iv] In the day that the Lord God [Vahweh-Elohim] made earth and heaven, no plant of the field was yet in the earth, and no herh of the field had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground ; but there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life ; and man became a living soul. And the Lord God planted a garden eastward, in Eden ; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food ; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. [And a river goes out of Eden to water the gar- den ; and from thence it is parted, and becomes four heads. The name of the first is Pishon : that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold ; and the gold of that land is good ; there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY 6 1 name of the second river is Gihon ; the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Cush. And the name of the third river is Hiddekel ; that is it which goeth in front of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.] And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat ; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it, for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone ; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air ; and brought them unto the man to see what he would call them ; and whatsoever the man called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And the man gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field ; but for man there was not found an help meet for him. And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept ; and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place; and of the rib, which the Lord God had taken from the man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And the man said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh ; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of man. There- fore shall a man leave his father and his mother, 62 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL and shall cleave unto his wife ; and they shall be one flesh. And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed. Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat, but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die, for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat ; and she gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat. And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked ; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves girdles. And they heard the sound of the Lord God walk- ing in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden. And the Lord God called unto the man, and said unto him, Where art thou ? And he said, I heard thy footsteps in the garden, and I was afraid, be- STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY 63 cause I was naked ; and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. And the Lord God said unto the woman, What is this thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, cursed art thou above all cattle, and above every beast of the field ; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life ; and I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy offspring and her off- spring : it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy pain and thy conception ; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children ; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast heark- ened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it : cursed is the ground for thy sake ; in toil shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life ; thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee ; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field ; in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground ; for out of it wast thou taken : for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. [And the man called his wife's name 64 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Eve ; because she was the mother of all living.] And the Lord God made for Adam and for his wife coats of skins, and clothed them. And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is be- come as one of us, to know good and evil ; and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever — Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man ; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden the Cheru- bim, and the flame of a sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life. And the man knew Eve his wife ; and she con- ceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord [Yahweh]. And again she bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. And Abel, he also brought of the first- lings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering ; but unto Cain and to his offering he had not re- spect. And Cain was very wroth, and his counte- nance fell. And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well? — Sin coucheth at the STORY OF THE FIRST FAMILY 65 door, and lieth in wait for thee, but thou shouldest rule over it. And Cain said unto Abel his brother — And it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him. And the Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother ? And he said, I know not ; am I my brother's keeper? And he said, What hast thou done ? The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground. And now cursed art thou from the ground, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand ; when thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength ; a fugitive and a wanderer shalt thou be in the earth. And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the ground ; and from thy face shall I be hid ; and I shall be a fugi- tive and a wanderer in the earth ; and it shall come to pass, that whosoever findeth me shall slay me. And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sev- enfold. And the Lord appointed a sign for Cain, lest any finding him should smite him. And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod [wandering] in front of Eden. And Cain knew his wife ; and she conceived, and bare Enoch ; and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch. And unto Enoch was born Irad, and Irad begat 66 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Mehujacl, and Mehujael begat Methushael, and Methushael begat Lamech. And Lamech took unto him two wives; the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. And Adah bare Jabal : he was the father of such as dwell in tents and have cattle. And his brother's name was Jubal : he was the father of all such as handle the harp and pipe. And Zillah, she also bare Tubal-cain, the forger of every cutting instrument of brass and iron ; and the sister of Tubal-cain was Naamah. And Lamech said unto his wives : Adah and Zillah, hear my voice ; Ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech : For I have slain a man for wounding me, And a young man for bruising me : If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, Truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold. [And Adam knew his wife again ; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth : For, said she, God hath appointed me another offspring instead of Abel ; for Cain slew him. And to Seth, to him also there was born a son ; and he called his name Enosh. Then began men to call upon the name of the Lord.] Ill THE ANTEDILUVIAN GENERATIONS The fifth chapter of Genesis is from the Elohist document and its close connection with the pas- sage from the same source with which the book opens is quite obvious. While the reference to the creation of man, as male and female, in the plural, is repeated, the personification of the father of mankind in Adam is made definite in accordance with a plan which pervades the whole book. The Elohist was much given to genealo- gies personifying places and peoples. According to him there were ten antediluvian generations of long life. A distinct relation has been traced be- tween the names of the heads of these generations with their durations, and those of the antediluvian dynasties of Chaldean legend, but it is no part of the present purpose to follow this out. The cor- respondence of the years of Enoch's age, after which he "walked with God" and "was not," with the number of days in the year is noticeable, and suggests an astronomical myth, of which the Chaldeans had many. 67 68 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Lamech, the father of Noah, appears in the seventh generation after Seth, while the Jehovist made him the descendant of Cain in the fifth generation. The intermediate names in the two genealogies vary in their form and order, but evidently had a common source. The northern writer was less familiar with geographical and legendary appellations than the author of the Elohist document, and there was no system or direct purpose in his slight use of them. [V] This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God [Elohim] created man, in the likeness of God made he him ; male and female created he them ; and blessed them, and called their name Adam [man], in the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image, and called his name Seth ; and the days of Adam after he begat Seth were eight hundred years, and he begat sons and daughters. And all the days that Adam lived were nine hun- dred and thirty years, and he died. And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enosh ; and Seth lived after he begat Enosh eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters; and all the days of Seth were nine hun- dred and twelve years, and he died. ANTEDILUVIAN GENERATIONS 69 And Enosh lived ninety years, and begat Kenan, and Enosh lived after he begat Kenan eight hun- dred and fifteen years, and begat sons and daugh- ters ; and all the days of Enosh were nine hundred and five years, and he died. And Kenan lived seventy years, and begat Ma- halalel ; and Kenan lived after he begat Mahalalel eight hundred and forty years, and begat sons and daughters ; and all the days of Kenan were nine hundred and ten years, and he died. And Mahalalel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared ; and Mahalalel lived after he begat Jared eight hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters ; and all the days of Mahalalel were eight hundred ninety and five years, and he died. And Jared lived an hundred sixty and two years, and begat Enoch ; and Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters ; and all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years, and he died. And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah ; and Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters ; and all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years, and Enoch walked with God and he was not, for God took him. And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech ; and Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty JO THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL and two years, and begat sons and daughters ; and all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years, and he died. And Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son, and he called his name Noah [saying, This same shall comfort us for our work and for the toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed]. And Lamech lived after he begat Noah five hundred ninety and five years, and begat sons and daughters ; and all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years, and he died. And Noah was five hundred years old ; and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth. IV THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD In the old days when the memories of mankind first began to take form in myths and legends, which were ultimately preserved in writing, there seems to have been in the East a wide-spread tradition of a great cataclysm of nature, accom- panied by an overwhelming flood of waters. It is not unlikely that this had come down from actual occurrences in the valleys of the great rivers, and on the shores of the seas some time in the early history of the human race. It is no more than natural if the inhabitants of regions in which this tradition prevailed, with their limited knowledge of the world's area, vastly exaggerated the extent of the destruction attending such catas- trophes, and nothing could be more useful to the makers of myths than the terror they inspired. The ancient Hebrews had no tradition of their own of this kind, but the Chaldeans of the Eu- phrates valley had one of the most highly devel- oped of the diluvian myths, and it has been sufficiently traced to put beyond doubt that it 7i 72 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL furnished the material of the story of " Noah's Flood." The compiler adopted the Elohist ver- sion of this story, but interpolated in it some fragments and phrases from the other, which he seemed to regard as necessary to complete it, but which really confused it. If the passage given below, which constitutes the four chapters, vi.-ix., of the Book of Genesis, is read without the frag- ments that are bracketed or italicized, it will be found to be complete and harmonious in itself. It represents Noah as taking the animals into the ark two by two, male and female, for preserva- tion, with no distinction of clean and unclean. The Elohist, in his account of the creation, rep- resented God as giving to man the " herb yielding seed," and the fruit of every tree to be "for food," and the "green herb" for food for animals. In preparing the ark for its perilous voyage Noah is directed to take two of every sort of living things "to keep them alive," and to gather "of all food that is eaten" for himself and for them. The same writer describes God as blessing Noah after the flood, and delivering into his hand the beast of the earth, the fowl of the air, and the fishes of the sea, and giving him "every moving thing that liveth" for food. This appears with him to be the origin of animal food for man. He repre- THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD J I sented the deluge of waters as the result of a general cataclysm, a breaking up of the fountains of the great deep, and an opening of the windows of heaven, and he allows a hundred. and fifty days for the rise of the overwhelming flood, and a like period for its subsidence. He leaves Noah and his family in the ark more than a year. In the Chaldean legend there appears to have been an association of this period with an astronomical myth. The other account, doubtless that of the Jeho- vist, represents Noah as taking seven pairs of " clean beasts " into the ark, the overplus beyond what was necessary for the preservation of species being presumably for food. The inadequacy of accommodations in the ark, as it is described, for what it was to contain, is a detail of no account, if we recognize the mythical character of the whole story. Such incongruities are common in antique fable. The writer, who had conceived of the earth at the creation as a barren waste of land waiting for moisture, instead of a chaos of waters from which the land was to emerge, conceived of the flood as the result of a steady down-pour of rain. According to him Noah entered the ark and waited seven days, and then the flood of waters came in a rainfall of forty days and forty 74 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL nights, when it subsided, and the ark rested "upon the mountains of Ararat." To him belong the incidents of opening the window and sending out a raven and a dove, and finally looking forth and finding the face of the ground dried. The time of waiting on the mountain top was made up of three periods of seven days, and seventy days covered the whole time of the stay in the ark. The difference in the two accounts of the flood, which the compiler mixed up, is plainly discernible when we separate the broken frag- ments of the one from the continuous fabric of the other. The passages and phrases which do not belong to the Elohist version are printed below in italics, those which were wrought into it as a part of the same narrative being put in brackets. At the beginning and at the end of the whole story are two separate interpolations which are bracketed and left in Roman type. The first is a curious bit of antique material with no direct relation to the context and is in- consistent with the post-diluvian genealogies in the decree of shortened life for man. The last shows Noah in a wholly different aspect from that of the story of the flood, and is apparently a scrap from the old patriarchal legends, intro- duced for the sake of the curse upon the peo- THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD 75 pie of Canaan, who were to be made subject to the offspring of Shem, from whom the Israelites were descended. It incidentally reflects a gross and sensual character imputed to. the Southern races, or descendants of Ham, and rebukes a special form of disrespect for fathers. The statement of Noah's age which follows connects with the genealogy of Chapter v., and seems to have been broken off from it by the insertion of the story of the flood after the preliminary statement of his age when he "begat Shem, Ham and Japheth." [VI-IX] [And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all that they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not strive with man for ever, for that he also is flesh ; yet shall his days be an hundred and twenty years. The Nephilim (giants) were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them : the same were the mighty men which were of old, the men of renown.] And the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. J6 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom L have created from the face of the ground; both man, a?id beast, and creeping thing, and fowl of the air; for it repent- eth me that L have made them. But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord. These are the generations of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, and blameless in his generations. Noah walked with God. And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And the earth was cor- rupt before God, and the earth was filled with vio- lence. And God saw the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt ; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me ; for the earth is filled with violence through them ; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth. Make thee an ark of gopher wood ; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch. And this is how thou shalt make it : the length of the ark three hun- dred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits. A light shalt thou make to the ark, and to a cubit shalt thou finish it upward ; and the door of the ark shalt thou set in the side thereof; with lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it. And I, behold, I do bring the flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven ; every thing that THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD y>J is in the earth shall die. But I will establish my covenant with thee ; and thou shalt come into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee. And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee ; they shall be male and female. Of the fowl after their kind, and of the cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the ground after its kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive. And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and gather it to thee ; and it shall be for food for thee, and for them. Thus did Noah ; according to all that God commanded him, so did he. And the Lord said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark ; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation. Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, the male and his female ; and of the beasts that are not clean two, the male and his female ; of the fowl also of the air, seven and seven, male and female, to keep the ?-ace alive upon the face of all the earth. For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living thing that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the ground. And Noah did according unto all that the Lord commanded him. And Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth. And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters 78 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL of the flood. Of [clean] beasts, [and of beasts that are not clean,'] and of fowls, and of every thing that creepeth upon the ground, there went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, male and female, as God commanded Noah. [Audit came to pass after the seven days, that the waters of the flood zvere upon the earth. ,] In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. [And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.'] In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark ; they, and every beast after its kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after its kind, and every fowl after its kind, every bird of every sort. And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh wherein is the breath of life. And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God commanded him ; [and the Lord shut him in. And the flood was forty days upon the earth ; and the "waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the eart/i.] And the waters prevailed, and increased greatly upon the earth ; and the ark went upon the face of the waters. And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth ; and all the high mountains that THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD 79 were under the whole heaven were covered. Fif- teen cubits upward did the waters prevail ; and the mountains were covered. And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both fowl, and cattle, and beast, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man : [all in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. And every living thing was de- stroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and creeping thing, and fowl of the heaven ; and they were destroyed from the earth ; and Noah only was left, and they that were with him in the ark.~\ And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days. And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that were with him in the ark; and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters assuaged ; the fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped ; \_and the rain from heaven was restrained ; and the waters returned from off the earth continually .•] and after the end of an hundred and fifty days the waters decreased [and the ark rested] in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month [upon the mountains of Ararat.'] And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month. In the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen. {And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the windotv of the ark which he had made; and he sent forth a raven, and it went SO THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth. And he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were aim ted from off the face of the ground; but the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him to the ai'k,for the waters were on the face of the whole earth ; and he put forth his hand, and took her, and brought her in unto him into the ark. And he stayed yet other seven days ; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark ; and the dove came in to him at eventide ; and, lo, in her mouth an olive leaf pluekt off : so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth. And he stayed yet other seven days ; and sent forth the dove ; and she returned not again unto him any more.] And it came to pass in the six hundred and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth ; \_and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dried.'] And in the second month, on the seven and twen- tieth day of the month, was the earth dry. And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee of all flesh, both fowl, and cattle, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth ; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him. Every beast, THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD 8 1 every creeping thing, and every fowl, whatsoever moveth upon the earth, after their families, went forth out of the ark. And Noah bit ikied an altar unto the Lord ; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. And the LORD smelted the sweet savour ; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake, for that the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth ; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease. And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air ; with all wherewith the ground teemeth, and all the fishes of the sea, into your hand are they delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be food for you ; as the green herb have I given you all. But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. And surely your blood, the blood of your lives, will I avenge ; from every beast will I exact retribution for it ; and at the hand of man, even at the hand of every man's brother, will I exact retribution for the life of man. Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed, for in the image of God made he man. And you, be ye fruitful, and 82 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL multiply j bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein. And (iod spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, And I. behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your posterity after you ; and with every living creature that is with you, the fowl, the cattle, and every beast of the earth with you ; of all that go out of the ark, even every beast of the earth. And I will establish my covenant with you ; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of the flood ; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations : I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud, and I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh ; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud ; and I will look upon it, that I may remem- ber the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth. And the sons of Noah, thai went forth of the ark, were Shan, and Ham, and Japheth : and Ham is THE MIXED ACCOUNT OF THE FLOOD 83 the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah : and of these was the whole earth overspread. [And Noah began to be an husbandman, and planted a vineyard ; and he drank of the wine, and was drunken, and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father ; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his youngest son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan ; A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem ; And let Canaan be his servant. God enlarge Japheth, And let him dwell in the tents of Shem ; And let Canaan be his servant.] And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years. And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years : and he died. V POST-DILUVIAN GENERATIONS Chapter x. of the Book of Genesis is purely eth- nographical and was intended to account for the distribution of population within the range of the writer's geography. Its basis was no doubt in the Elohist document, as a genealogy of the de- scendants of Noah, but it appears to have been expanded by the compiler to conform to a some- what more definite knowledge in his day. The names were partly those of places, some cities and some broader territorial designations, and partly those of tribes or peoples. Japheth, which implied vast extent, compre- hended the Northern and Western peoples, of which comparatively little was then known. Magog was a term applied to the distant Scythians, and Javan included the Ionians. Dodanim seems to be iden- tical with the Rodanim of the Book of Chronicles, and is supposed to mean the Rhodians. Ham, which implied a hot climate, comprehended the people of the South and the distant East, in- cluding Egypt under the name of Mizraim. The Canaanite tribes did not properly belong to this 8 4 POST-DILUVIAN GENERATIONS 85 division, but to the Semitic race. They were remotely akin to the Israelites, but their subjec- tion and the hereditary antipathy engendered by it led to placing them among the progeny of Ham and putting a special opprobrium upon their name. The reference to Nimrod and the founding of Nineveh was an interpolation derived from the prolific source of Chaldean myth, in which the mighty hunter was an astronomical figure cor- responding to Orion. The phrase " before the Lord" is simply an intensive or superlative form of expression. Zidon is mentioned both as the son of Canaan and as a place on " the border of the Canaanite " ; and the personal names for the tribes of Canaan did not go beyond Heth, the supposed ancestor of the Hittites. Shem, meaning simply "name," implied the noble strain in the descendants of Noah. Arpach- shad was the name of a place, Shelah signified "emigration," and Peleg "division." The ethnog- raphy is by no means systematic or clear, and there is a repetition of names. Sheba and Havi- lah are given both as descendants of Ham and of Shem. The former represented the people of Southern Arabia, who are supposed to have be- come the progenitors of the Nubians and Abyssin- ians. Uz and Jobab, which irresistibly suggest S6 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL Job and the land of Uz, appear again in the gene- alogies of Seir and Edom (Chapter xxxvi.). The whole scheme was a rough attempt at accounting for the origin of the nations " divided in the earth after the flood," according to the imperfect geo- graphical knowledge of the writer, and the slight revision of the compiler probably produced the repetitions. The compiler followed this with a fragment (xi. 1-9) bearing the distinct characteristics of the Jehovist, with his fondness for the fabulous in dealing with the perversities of man. The pre- ceding genealogy distinctly implied a diversity of language in the division of the races, " after their tongues," as well as their families, but this frag- ment assumed "one speech" until it was "con- founded " in consequence of a rash attempt to keep the people from being scattered over the earth, by building a tower which should reach heaven. This picturesque bit of mythism was undoubtedly suggested by the unfinished temple of Bel in "the land of Shinar," and the assumed derivation of its name from the Hebrew verb "to confound " was mere fancy. It really meant the gate (or the house) of Bel, the deity of the Baby- lonians, and had no etymological relation to "balal" or any other Hebrew word. POST-DILUVIAN GENERATIONS 8? After this a characteristic piece of genealogy from the Elohist (xi. 10-32) was introduced, trac- ing the direct line of descent from Shem to Abram. Exactly what significance might be attached to the definite statement of the ages of the several begetters of these generations — ten in number like those before the flood — we cannot say, but they furnish the means, if any is neces- sary, for exposing the utterly unhistorical charac- ter of the whole scheme. It represents the time in which Abram lived as being only three to four centuries after the destruction of all mankind ex- cept one family, from which he was descended in the tenth generation. And yet in that brief period had grown up many nations scattered over a wide area, with their various "borders" and cities, and "the great City of" Nineveh had been long ago founded. We know now that still existing pyramids must have been built a thousand years before the time assigned to Abram by the Hebrews them- selves, and their own account of his career implies antiquity in the "Chaldees," and the establishment, for an indefinite time, of the Kingdom of Egypt. Apart from the absurdity of supposing that all the development implied in these narratives, and well ascertained from other sources, had taken place in three or four centuries of time, 88 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL if we note that this genealogy itself would make Shem, the son of Noah, a survivor of Abraham by thirty-five years, and a living contemporary of Pharaoh, Abimelech, and the other potentates of their time, the assumption takes a ludicrous aspect. The subject can, however, be regarded seriously without being taken as even intended to be matter of fact. The first eleven chapters of Genesis consti- tute a work by themselves, composite, irregular, and fragmentary, but forming a prelude to the mythical history of Israel's ancestry. [X-XI] Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah : Shem, Ham and Japheth ; and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth : Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. And the sons of Gomer : Ashkenaz, and Ri- phath, and Togarmah. And the sons of Javan : Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. Of these were the isles of the nations divided in their lands, every one after his tongue ; after their fami- lies, in their nations. And the sons of Ham : Cush, and Mizraim, and Put, and Canaan. And the sons of Cush : Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sab- teca ; and the sons of Raamah : Sheba, and Dedan. POST-DILUVIAN GENERATIONS 89 [And Cush begat Nimrod. He began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord ; wherefore it is said, Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the Lord. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. Out of that land he went forth into Assyria, and builded Nineveh, and Rehoboth-Ir, and Calah, and Resen between Nine- veh and Calah (the same is the great city).] And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim, and Pathrusim, and Casluhim. [whence went forth the Philistines], and Caphtorim. And Canaan begat Zidon his first-born, and Heth, and the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girga- shite, and the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Si- nite, and the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite ; and afterward were the families of the Canaanite spread abroad. And the border of the Canaanite was from Zidon, as thou goest toward Gerar, unto Gaza ; as thou goest toward Sodom and Gomorrah and Admah and Zeboiim, unto Lasha. These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, in their nations. And unto Shem, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, to him also were children born. The sons of Shem : Elam, and Asshur, and Arpachshad, and Lud, and Aram. And the sons of Aram : Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Mash. And Arpachshad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber. And unto Eber were born two sons ; the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days was 90 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL the earth divided ; and his brother's name was Jok- tan. And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah ; and Hadoram, and Uzal, and Diklahj and Obal, and Abimael, and Sheba; and Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab : all these were the sons of Joktan. And their dwelling was from Mesha, as thou goest toward Sephar, the mountain of the east. These are the sons of Shem, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations. These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations; and of these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood. [And the whole earth was of one language and of one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar ; and they dwelt there. And they said one to an- other, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and bi- tumen had they for mortar. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city, and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven, to make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. And the Lord said, Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language ; and this is what they begin to do, and now nothing will be withholden from them which they purpose to do. Go to, let us go POST-DILUVIAN GENERATIONS 91 down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore was the name of it called Babel ; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth ; and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.] These are the generations of Shem. Shem was an hundred years old, and begat Arpachshad two years after the flood ; and Shem lived after he be- gat Arpachshad five hundred years, and begat sons and daughters. And Arpachshad lived five and thirty years, and begat Shelah ; and Arpachshad lived after he begat Shelah four hundred and three years, and begat sons and daughters. And Shelah lived thirty years, and begat Eber; and Shelah lived after he begat Eber four hundred and three years, and begat sons and daughters. And Eber lived four and thirty years, and begat Peleg; and Eber lived after he begat Peleg four hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters. And Peleg lived thirty years, and begat Reu ; and Peleg lived after he begat Reu two hundred and nine years, and begat sons and daughters. And Reu lived two and thirty years, and begat Serug; and Reu lived after he begat Serug two 92 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters. And Serug lived thirty years, and begat Nahor ; and Serug lived after he begat Nahor two hundred years, and begat sons and daughters. And Nahor lived nine and twenty years, and begat Terah ; and Nahor lived after he begat Terah an hundred and nineteen years, and begat sons and daughters. And Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran. Now these are the generations of Terah. Terah begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran ; and Haran begat Lot. And Haran died in the presence of his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chal- dees. And Abram and Nahor took them wives. The name of Abram's wife was Sarai ; and the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah. And Sarai was barren ; she had no child. And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran, his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife ; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan ; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there. And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years ; and Terah died in Haran. VI ABRAHAM TAKES POSSESSION OF THE LAND With Chapter xii. begins the story of Abraham, transformed from the mythical Chaldean king, father Orham, and from the putative ancestor of the kindred Semitic peoples, from the river to the sea, into the personal forefather of the Hebrew- tribes. The different elements in this production are not so clearly distinguishable as those of the preceding section of the book, but there is plain evidence of their existence in the many inconsist- encies of the narrative. The compiler wrought his materials together more completely, but not much more harmoniously, and the work of his own hand is more manifest. The Elohist docu- ment appears to have been rather meagre so far as it related to the Abraham legend, and the three episodes of Chapters xii. and xiii. are mainly from the Jehovist and derived by him largely from the original patriarchal idyls. The first episode describes Abraham's departure from his own country to Shechem, where the land was promised to his progeny. The event was 93 94 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL commemorated by building an altar, and then the possession of Bethel was consecrated by the same means. The passage in brackets is of different material from the rest and doubtless from the Elohist. Having taken possession of the North, Abraham journeyed south. The second episode, beginning with xii. n, is quite disconnected from this, and illustrates the divine favor supposed to be bestowed upon Abra- ham to protect him in a foreign land and to give him wealth. The device of a famine to account for his going into Egypt, and of plagues to explain his departure, was afterwards applied in a developed form in the case of his posterity. The incident of representing his wife to be his sister, as a means of protection to himself, throws light upon the moral ideas of the writer's time. There was no safeguard for the chastity of an unmarried woman, whether maid or widow, but any violation of the exclusive rights of the hus- band was regarded with horror. There appears to have been no sense of outrage if a sister should be appropriated for the harem of a sensual mon- arch, and Abraham is represented as being willing that his wife should meet the fate that might befall a sister to save himself from the fate of having her made a widow. The moral aspect of ABRAHAM TAKES POSSESSION OF THE LAND 95 the case is somewhat mitigated by the fact that the writer was dealing with symbolical characters rather than real persons, but it nevertheless re- flects the habit of thought of the time. Perhaps the aesthetic aspect of the case may also be re- lieved by the lack of reality in the characters ; for the charms of Sarai must have been somewhat mature, as she was said to be sixty-five years of age when they left Haran. The third episode (Chapter xiii. ) explains the division of the land between Abraham, as the an- cestor of Israel, and Lot, as the ancestor of Moab and Amnion, and the former's exclusive possession of the land of Canaan, albeit the " Canaanite and Perizzite" then dwelt there. There are traces of two diverse accounts of the division, one attribut- ing it to the increase of the substance of the two chiefs, and the other to strife between their herds- men. Notwithstanding all his wealth and sub- stance in flocks and herds, the patriarch is described as passing through the land to revisit his altar at Bethel and as moving his tent to Hebron, the place which first became the centre of consecration for the Kingdom of Judah. This latter is apparently a touch from the Judean com- piler, but the whole is in the true spirit of legend, typifying in a sweeping way the original occupa- 96 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL tion of the country. The interpolated statement as to the wickedness of Sodom appears to be the compiler's preparation for the story of its destruc- tion introduced farther on. [XII, XIII] Now the Lord said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto the land that I will shew thee ; and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great ; and be thou a blessing, and I will bless them that bless thee, and him that curseth thee will I curse, and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed. So Abram went, as the Lord had spoken unto him ; and Lot went with him : [and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran. And Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all their substance that they had gathered, and the souls that they had gotten in Haran ; and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan ; and into the land of Canaan thev came.] And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Shechem, unto the oak of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land. And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy posterity will I give this land : and there builded he an altar unto the Lord, who appeared unto him. And he removed from thence unto the mountain on the east of Beth- el, and pitched his tent, having Beth-el on ABRAHAM TAKES POSSESSION OF THE LAND 07 the west, and Ai on the east ; and there he builded an altar unto the Lord, and called upon the name of the Lord. And Abram journeyed, going on still toward the South ; and there was a famine in the land, and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there, for the famine was sore in the land. And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon ; and it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife, and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive. Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister, that it may be well with me for thy sake, and that my soul may live because of thee. And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. And the princes of Pharaoh saw her, and praised her to Pharaoh ; and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. And he dealt well with Abram for her sake ; and he had sheep, and oxen, and he-asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she-asses, and camels. And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? Why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? Why saidst thou, She is my sister, so that I took her to be my wife ? Now therefore behold thy wife, take H 98 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL her, and go thy way. And Pharaoh gave men charge concerning him ; and they brought him on the way, and his wife, and all that he had. And Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and his wife, and all that he had, into the South, and Lot was with him. [And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold.] And he went on his journeys from the South even to Beth-el, unto the place where his tent had been at the beginning, between Beth-el and Ai ; unto the place of the altar, which he had made there at the first ; and there Abram called on the name of the Lord. [And Lot also, which went with Abram, had flocks, and herds, and tents. And the land was not able to bear them, that they might dwell together, for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell to- gether.] And there was a strife between the herdmen of Abram's cattle and the herdmen of Lot's cattle : \_and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the land.'] And Abram said unto Lot, Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and be- tween my herdmen and thy herdmen ; for we are brethren. Is not the whole land before thee? Sepa- rate thyself, I pray thee, from me ; if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right ; or if thou take the right hand, then I will go to the left. And Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the Plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where be- fore the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, like the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt, as ABRAHAM TAKES POSSESSION OF THE LAND 99 thou goest unto Zoar. So Lot chose him all the Plain of Jordan; and Lot journeyed east; [and they separated themselves the one from the other. Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelled in the cities of the Plain,] and moved his tent as far as Sodom. \_JV01a the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners against the Lord exceedingly^ And the Lord said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art, northward and south- ward and eastward and westward ; for all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy posterity for ever. And I will make thy race as the dust of the earth, so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy race also be num- bered. Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it ; for unto thee will I give it. And Abram moved his tent, and came and dwelt by the terebinths of Mamre, which are in Hebron, and built there an altar unto the Lord. VII ABRAHAM AS A WARLIKE CHIEF The passage which stands apart as the four- teenth chapter of Genesis presents Abraham in a character and aspect that appear nowhere else. Whether the compiler found it as a legend com- plete in itself, or extracted it from some longer document, or whether he composed it from existing material, written or oral, with a purpose of his own, is matter only of conjecture. Most critics assume that it was contained in the Jehovist document, but two widely different views have been taken of it. Some have regarded it as a fragment of ancient chronicle, revealing glimpses of an antique world in the light of reality, — a scene torn from a pano- rama of prehistoric life in the weird region of the Dead Sea. Others see in it a myth later than the main substance of the story rather than earlier, illustrating, like many another legend of the kind, the invincible might of the favorite of Israel's God as against the heathen. In support of this view is cited the extravagant improbability of the exploit of IOO ABRAHAM AS A WARLIKE CHIEF IOI pursuing through the length and breadth of the land the armies of the confederated kings, with a band of three hundred and eighteen trained men "born in his house," and recovering their plunder. The use of the name " Damascus " was relatively modern, and Dan, at the northern border of the land, was established late in the period of the judges. Of the country devastated by the invad- ing kings from the East was that of the Amale- kites. In the ethnographical system of the book, the Amalekites were the descendants of Amalek, and in the eponymic genealogies of the Elohist, farther on, Amalek was the grandson of Abra- ham's grandson Esau. These anachronisms appear inconsistent with the assumed antiquity of the composition, what- ever may be said of the traditions from which it might have been derived. The vivid picture of Melchizedek, blessing Abraham, and receiving from him a tenth of all, is so different from all other references in Hebrew story to alien rulers and pagan priests, as to suggest a device for giving an ancient sanctity to Salem, the site of the Judean capital, to the union of the functions of king and priest in one person, and to the pay- ment of tithes for the support of his beneficent sway. Moreover, the significance of the name, 102 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL " King of righteousness," would rather imply a symbolical character in the whole story than a recognition of superior sovereignty in an ancient Jebusite monarch on the height of Salem (peace). These suggestions, if they point to the truth, indicate a relatively late composition for this pas- sage, though wrought upon an antique pattern. The term " El-Elion " (God most high) was in use in Phoenicia. The writer of the letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament, erroneously credited to St. Paul in the canon, plainly regarded Melchizedek as an allegorical character, " being first, by inter- pretation, King of righteousness, and then also King of Salem, which is King of peace ; without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like unto the Son of God." Doubtless the whole story of the slaughter of the kings, and the giving of a tenth of all the recovered spoil to this king of righteousness and peace, was a symbolical representation of the power and sanc- tity of Israel's mythical ancestor, and of the obligation of his descendants to devote a tithe of their substance to the consecrated impersona- tion of an authority derived from the God of Abraham. One of the incidental touches which ABRAHAM AS A WARLIKE CHIEF 103 seem inconsistent with the special antiquity of this production is the prosaic statement that one who had escaped "told Abram the Hebrew." The word " Hebrew " did not come, into use as a designation of the people of Israel until after the establishment of the kingdoms. The main features of the narrative were doubtless suggested by one of the many invasions of the Southern country from Shinar (Chaldea) and Elam (be- yond the Tigris). The original author perhaps made use of real traditions and wove into them the exploits of Abraham. [XIV] And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of Goiim, that they made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela \_the same is Zoar\. All these joined together in the vale of Siddim [the same is the Salt Sea~\. Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled. And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer, and the kings that were with him, and smote the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim, and the Zuzim in Ham, and the Emim in Shaveh-kiriathaim, and the Horites in their mount Seir, unto El-paran, which 104 THE MYTHS OF ISRAEL is by the wilderness. And they returned, and came to En-mishpat [the same is Kadesh~\, and smote all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amo- rites, that dwelt in Hazazon-tamar. And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela [/// e^P lANCElfjJ 3 ^58 01080 5769 =o r^n r-n UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY AA 000 377 686 — • -— Y-SOr A ^OF 30 !£ ;U %] WIF(% _v ^EMIVERS//