UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA agricultural experiment Station COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE E - J - Wickson, d.rector BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA CIRCULAR No. 48 BUTTER SCORING CONTEST 1909 HERBERT A. HOPPER At a meeting of the California Creamery Operators' Association at San Francisco in November, 1908, the discussion, on one occasion at least, led ns to believe that the time was ripe to establish among Cali- fornia buttermakers an Educational Butter Scoring Contest. Some weeks later a circular letter proposing a contest was sent out to as many buttermakers of the state as could be located, as well as to the dairy and agricultural press. The original suggestion included a Cheese Scoring Contest as well, but from the results of this first request for an expression of opinion, it developed that there was little to support a cheese contest but that the creamery buttermakers were ready and willing to subscribe to any reasonable plan to inaugurate a Butter Scoring Contest. So far, the creamery men of California had had no opportunity to submit their butter in a systematic way to scoring and criticism and the plan appealed to them. As will be seen later, they came to the support of the plan adopted and continued throughout the year as steadfast as conditions would permit them to be. Those who are at all familiar with creamery and dairy conditions throughout California know that there is a great opportunity for educational work in the direction of improved methods in butter- making. While our butter output has gone forward in the past few years with leaps and bounds and now assumes immense financial proportions, it is not true that sound theory and practice has kept pace in every instance. For this reason, an educational contest for the busy buttermaker who cannot often leave the churn long enough to take a short course of instruction, seemed to offer admirable oppor- tunities for improvement. At specified times he may ship an entry, have it scored and criticised, and thereby profit greatly. It was with these educational features in mind that the following plan was adopted. PLAN OF CONTEST. 1. One class only — Creamery butter. 2. The score card recommended by the U. S. Dairy Division to be used. 3. The butter submitted to represent the regular run. 4. Each contestant limited to one 20-lb. cubical package. 5. To compete for. prizes, each contestant must submit an entry to each of the six contests during the year. 6. Each contestant to prepay all express charges on his entries and donate one entry to the premium fund; the receipts from all other entries to be refunded. 7. Each entry to be scored, criticised and tested for moisture, and the results reported to the buttermaker sending the entry. PREMIUM. In addition to the money obtained from the first entry, a few supply and commission men responded to our call so that the premium fund for the first year finally reached $123.96. This amount has been drawn upon in purchasing the prizes, printing the certificates, and for a few other minor matters concerned with the contest. "With this small amount available, only two very modest prizes could be provided, so that the following rules were adopted : 1. A first and a second prize cup will be awarded, respectively, to the holder of the highest and the second highest average of the six scorings during the year. 2. A certificate of merit will be awarded to each contestant whose six scorings average 92. 3. The prizes in each case are to become the permanent possession of the winner. METHOD BLANK. In order to make valuable criticisms, it is necessary for the critic to have before him, not only the score given by the judges with their remarks, but also an outline of the method followed in making each piece of butter. To provide this information, we requested that each entry be accompanied by the answers to the following questions, in so far as they could be supplied. Only such facts are called for as seem pertinent to the subject and it would seem that any creamery should be so equipped that the buttermaker could answer them all. However, some are not and we found cases where the buttermaker failed to report acidity and other tests through mere negligence to do so. However, the method blank served a useful purpose and we hope has been the means of stimulating interest in a systematic way of keeping records. Sending an entry without a method blank robs the criticism of three-fourths of its value. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE. EDUCATIONAL BUTTER SCORING CONTEST. METHOD BLANK. Fill in and return to Dairy Industry, University Farm, Davis, Calif, Name of Creamery : __. Creamery at Manager Buttermaker Milk or cream received when Date churned What portion gathered cream What portion milk Condition of milk or cream Age Per cent, of fat Pounds of fat Pasteurized at what temperature Cooled to what temperature Per cent, of starter added Eipened to what per cent, acidity Cooled to what temperature Time held before churning Buttermilk temperature Test ----- Wash water temperature Size of butter granules - Butter churned, pounds Overrun, lbs. Per cent Butter color, brand Amount Salt, brand Amount Starter culture, brand — Washing powder, brand.. -— Milk heater, make Separator, make — Pasteurizer, make Eipening vat, make Churn, make DIRECTIONS FOR SHIPPING. Answer the questions on this method blank carefully. Your answer will help us in criticising your butter. Pack butter in 20-lb. collapsible cube or in a cube made from clean. light lumber. The latter should be 9" x 9" x 6" inside dimensions, and is conveniently constructed from material used in the unreturnable butter cases. Line package with parchment paper after paraffining. When shipping, place this cube inside a larger one, giving l"-2" space on all sides. The space between should be packed solidly with paper. Cool cube of butter several hours before its final packing. Never ship directly from churn. Attach enclosed shipping tag to your package. .Prepay express. The following score card was used : SCORE CARD. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE. DAIRY INDUSTRY. Name No. BUTTER SCORE CARD. Date. Perfect Score CHECK FLAVOR Rancid - Over-ripe Cream 45 Bitter Cream 25 BODY Worked Too Much Worked Not Enough COLOR Too High Too Light 15 Mottled Streaked 10 SALT Too Much Not Enough PACKING Poor Packing 5 Poor Package 100 Total % Water Scored by METHOD OF JUDGING. As soon as the entries arrived at the University Farm Creamery, they were assigned a serial number which was recorded, then stripped of all identifying marks and placed in cold storage. A day or so later when placed before the judges, there was nothing to suggest to them the origin of a single entry. In addition to this, the judges worked independently of each other. The scoring was under the direction of Mr. C. L. Mitchell, a representative of the Dairy Division of the United States Department of Agriculture, who employed the standards and methods recommended by that Division. First Entry One swallow does not make a summer, neither does the data col- lected from one season's contests establish or disprove facts in butter- making. It is hoped, however, that the data presented in the following pages do have value at least in indicating the methods that California buttermakers are employing and why certain individuals are uniformly more successful than others. The data obtained from the method blank accompanying each entry have been arranged in a simple, self- explanatory fashion in the following tables. The score and per cent, of moisture are our own determinations. The other facts are given as reported. In each case, the per cent, of overrun has been computed from the reported pounds of cream, its per cent, of fat and the pounds of butter made from it. Without stopping to call attention in detail to each table, our purpose, which is to start the buttermaker thinking along right lines, will be served if he will take up each entry separately and trace out the relationship existing between the score, the condition of the cream, its acidity, age, etc., and the way it was handled; i.e., whether it was pasteurized or not, and the amount of starter used. First Entry — February 25, 1909. Creamery. a m 24 1 16 23 12 9 14 18 15 10 4 19 13 17 5 Gridley Creamery Edenco Creamery Colusa Butter Co Crystal Cream & Butter Co. Denman Creamery Homestead Creamery Co San Pasqual Creamery Hicks Valley Creamery Pozzi Creamery Suisun Creamery Tomales Creamery Sutter County Creamery Good Luck Creamery Bay View Creamery Rose City Creamery Smith's Creamery 94 93% 93 y 2 93 % 93 92 3/ 4 92% 92 92 92 91% 91 91 90% 90 y 2 90 88y 2 88y 2 88% 88% 86% 13.7 13.2 13.2 13.5 14.2 11.6 14.2 14.5 15.2 13.2 14.3 15 10 10 20 10 frp* 36. 36.5 30. 32. 32.5 31. 40. 37.5 33. 31.5 30. 35. 30. 31. 26.5 29. 31. 35. 29. 38. 1% 2-4 3 1-5 1-5 1% 4-5 1-3 1-3 6 3-4 1-2 1-2 1-3 1-2 O Old Sour Faii- Sour Sweet Good Good Old Fail- Good Fail- Fair Fail- Good Sour Good Fail- Fair .24 .48 .50 .58 .56 .56 .56 & be * a 12 4 14 18-24 1% 8 16 18-24 21 25 19 15 20 21 29 20 16 Average. 90.97 13.7 2% 12 20 The butter in the first entry that scored highest was made as follows : Gathered cream which was slightly old, and tested 36% fat, was churned the day after it was received. Fifteen per cent, of starter was added, then it was ripened and cooled to 52°. Churning was continued until the granules reached the size of hazelnuts. The buttermilk temperature was 53° and the wash water 60°. The cream was not pasteurized. Standard commercial culture and color were used. The cream was ripened in an open vat. The butter in the first entry that scored lowest was made as follows : A fair grade of 38% gathered cream was churned the day after it was received. Its age was from 2-4 days. Only 4% of starter was used in this cream which was ripened to .6% acidity, cooled to 56°, and held 12 hours. Churning was continued until the granules reached the size of wheat kernels. The buttermilk temperature was 57° and the wash water 56°. The cream was not pasteurized but ripened in a modern ripener. A standard commercial culture was used but no artificial color. Note the difference between these two in score, age of cream, and per cent, of starter used. Acidity in the latter was too high for such old cream. Second Entry — April 23, 1909. Creamery. Gridley Creamery Western Yolo Creamery San Pasqual Creamery Bay View Creamery Ceres Creamery Pozzi Creamery Edenco Creamery Colusa Butter Co Suisun Creamery Pozzi Creamery Rose City Creamery Silva's Creamery Laton Co-op. Creamery Homestead Creamery United Creameries Crystal Cream & Butter Co. Denman Creamery Elite Creamery Antelope Creamery CD f* O 96 14.5 95 14. 94% 14. 94 V 2 13. 94 % 13. 94 15.5 94 14. 94 15. 93% 15. 93 13.6 93 12.2 92% 13. 92 13. 92 15.5 92 13. 91% 14. 91% 13. 90% 12.5 90 11.5 89% 15. 89 12. 89 13.5 88% 14.5 3f* O ft? < C ft XM- Average. 13.6 2-3 Sour 5 35. 24 40. %-2 Fair .55 . 4 30. 5-7 Fair 24 2 1-2 Sour 12 24 10 36.5 3 .43 18 12 32. 2 Fair .4 12 18% ... 39.4 1% Fair .58 5 32. 3-5 Faii- 12 12 29. 3 Sweet .5 12 40. 2 Good 48 15 37. %-l% Sweet 2% 20 1 Good 24 32. 1-2 Faii- 12 33.5 3 Good 18 20 39. 1 Sweet 25 2% . 5 5 14 12 25.5 2 Faii- .56 14 14 32. 2 Good .4 12 28. 2 12 10 40.5 3-4 Pair .6 20 14 34.2 2% .50 15% 4> U c > fcC 20 18 20 17 19 8 The butter in the second entry that scored highest was made as follows : The cream which was partly sour was churned the day after it was received. No starter is reported, though it was probably used. How- ever, the cream was cooled to 51°, held only 5 hours, and churned until the granules were the size of B.B. shot. The buttermilk temperature was 56° and the wash water 57°. A standard culture is reported but no artificial color. The butter in the second entry that scored lowest was made as follows : A fair grade of 40|% cream was churned the day after it was received. It was then three or four days old. Ten per cent, of starter was used, and the cream ripened to .6% acidity and cooled to 59°, and held 20 hours before churning. Churning was continued until the granules reached the size of a kernel of corn. The buttermilk was 60° and the wash water 58°. A standard culture was used but no artificial color. Note the difference in time held before churning. Nothing is gained by holding sour cream. Add the starter and churn promptly. Too much acidity was allowed to develop in the cream of the low scoring entry. Third Entry— June 11, 1909. The butter in the third entry that scored highest was made as follows : A fair grade of gathered cream testing 32% was churned the day after it was received and was only one day old. Ten per cent, of starter was added; the cream was ripened to .5% acidity, cooled to 50° and churned immediately. The buttermilk temperature was 56° and the wash water 58°. Standard culture and artificial color were used. No pasteurization was employed. The butter in the third entry that scored lowest was made as follows : A cream testing 36% was obtained from sweet milk and churned the day following. Twelve per cent, of starter was added; the cream was ripened to .36% acidity, cooled to 54° and churned four hours later. The buttermilk and wash water were 58°. Standard culture and color were used. The cream was not pasteurized. The highest scoring butter in this entry was made in accordance with approved practices. Note the temperatures used and the prompt churning. The butter scoring lowest seemed to have conditions in its favor, though it was a small churning. It evidently shows the disastrous effects of uncleanly practices and poor starter upon good cream. Creamery, Colusa Butter Co Castroville Creamery Co Gridley Creamery Pioneer Creamery Pozzi Creamery "Western Yolo Creamery San Pasqual Creamery Homestead Creamery Elite Creamery Edenco Creamery Tulare Co-op. Creamery Orland Creamery Crystal Cream & Butter Co. Hicks Valley Creamery Salinas Creamery Co Rose City Creamery Ceres Creamery Suisun Creamery Co Laton Co-op. Creamery... United Creameries Average. 03 O m 03 03 03 OS Oj . 2 03 +- SI a 03 95 12.5 10 94% 13.5 8 94 13. 16 93V 2 15. 20 150° 93% 12. 93 % 14.3 93 14. 93 14.5 12 92% 12. 20 92 3,4 12. 12 92 13. 92 11. 92 14.5 91% 13. 12 9iy 2 13. 10 91% 15.3 . 50 91% 13.5 10 91% 13.5 20 91% 12.5 15 90% 13. 89% 11.5 89% 12. 89 16.5 25 89 13. 88 13. 12 87 11. 12 32. 35. 32. 40. 34. 35. 40. 28. 29. 38. 23. 3 7. 30. 35. 42.3 36. 1 1-2 % 2% %-2 % 3 1-2 1 2 1 1-2 %-l% 1-2 O Fair Good Bitter Good Good Fair Faii- Sweet Sweet Good Fair Fail- Good Good Fair .5 .53 .65 .61 .56 .54 .43 .6 .55 Good Good 91.67 13.2 33.1 1% .55 - r Z. 9