UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA agricultural experiment Station 
 
 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE E - J - Wickson, d.rector 
 
 BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 
 
 CIRCULAR No. 48 
 
 BUTTER SCORING CONTEST 
 
 1909 
 
 HERBERT A. HOPPER 
 
 At a meeting of the California Creamery Operators' Association at 
 San Francisco in November, 1908, the discussion, on one occasion at 
 least, led ns to believe that the time was ripe to establish among Cali- 
 fornia buttermakers an Educational Butter Scoring Contest. Some 
 weeks later a circular letter proposing a contest was sent out to as 
 many buttermakers of the state as could be located, as well as to the 
 dairy and agricultural press. The original suggestion included a 
 Cheese Scoring Contest as well, but from the results of this first request 
 for an expression of opinion, it developed that there was little to 
 support a cheese contest but that the creamery buttermakers were 
 ready and willing to subscribe to any reasonable plan to inaugurate a 
 Butter Scoring Contest. So far, the creamery men of California had 
 had no opportunity to submit their butter in a systematic way to 
 scoring and criticism and the plan appealed to them. As will be seen 
 later, they came to the support of the plan adopted and continued 
 throughout the year as steadfast as conditions would permit them to 
 be. Those who are at all familiar with creamery and dairy conditions 
 throughout California know that there is a great opportunity for 
 educational work in the direction of improved methods in butter- 
 making. While our butter output has gone forward in the past few 
 years with leaps and bounds and now assumes immense financial 
 proportions, it is not true that sound theory and practice has kept 
 pace in every instance. For this reason, an educational contest for the 
 busy buttermaker who cannot often leave the churn long enough to 
 take a short course of instruction, seemed to offer admirable oppor- 
 tunities for improvement. At specified times he may ship an entry, 
 have it scored and criticised, and thereby profit greatly. It was with 
 these educational features in mind that the following plan was adopted. 
 
PLAN OF CONTEST. 
 
 1. One class only — Creamery butter. 
 
 2. The score card recommended by the U. S. Dairy Division to be 
 used. 
 
 3. The butter submitted to represent the regular run. 
 
 4. Each contestant limited to one 20-lb. cubical package. 
 
 5. To compete for. prizes, each contestant must submit an entry to 
 each of the six contests during the year. 
 
 6. Each contestant to prepay all express charges on his entries and 
 donate one entry to the premium fund; the receipts from all other 
 entries to be refunded. 
 
 7. Each entry to be scored, criticised and tested for moisture, and 
 the results reported to the buttermaker sending the entry. 
 
 PREMIUM. 
 
 In addition to the money obtained from the first entry, a few 
 supply and commission men responded to our call so that the premium 
 fund for the first year finally reached $123.96. This amount has been 
 drawn upon in purchasing the prizes, printing the certificates, and for 
 a few other minor matters concerned with the contest. "With this 
 small amount available, only two very modest prizes could be provided, 
 so that the following rules were adopted : 
 
 1. A first and a second prize cup will be awarded, respectively, to 
 the holder of the highest and the second highest average of the six 
 scorings during the year. 
 
 2. A certificate of merit will be awarded to each contestant whose 
 six scorings average 92. 
 
 3. The prizes in each case are to become the permanent possession 
 of the winner. 
 
 METHOD BLANK. 
 
 In order to make valuable criticisms, it is necessary for the critic to 
 have before him, not only the score given by the judges with their 
 remarks, but also an outline of the method followed in making each 
 piece of butter. To provide this information, we requested that each 
 entry be accompanied by the answers to the following questions, in so 
 far as they could be supplied. Only such facts are called for as seem 
 pertinent to the subject and it would seem that any creamery should 
 be so equipped that the buttermaker could answer them all. However, 
 some are not and we found cases where the buttermaker failed to 
 
report acidity and other tests through mere negligence to do so. 
 However, the method blank served a useful purpose and we hope has 
 been the means of stimulating interest in a systematic way of keeping 
 records. Sending an entry without a method blank robs the criticism 
 of three-fourths of its value. 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE. 
 EDUCATIONAL BUTTER SCORING CONTEST. 
 
 METHOD BLANK. 
 Fill in and return to Dairy Industry, University Farm, Davis, Calif, 
 Name of Creamery : __. Creamery at 
 
 Manager Buttermaker 
 
 Milk or cream received when 
 
 Date churned 
 
 What portion gathered cream 
 
 What portion milk 
 
 Condition of milk or cream Age 
 
 Per cent, of fat Pounds of fat 
 
 Pasteurized at what temperature Cooled to what temperature 
 
 Per cent, of starter added Eipened to what per cent, acidity 
 
 Cooled to what temperature Time held before churning 
 
 Buttermilk temperature Test ----- 
 
 Wash water temperature Size of butter granules - 
 
 Butter churned, pounds Overrun, lbs. Per cent 
 
 Butter color, brand Amount 
 
 Salt, brand Amount 
 
 Starter culture, brand — 
 
 Washing powder, brand.. -— 
 
 Milk heater, make 
 
 Separator, make — 
 
 Pasteurizer, make 
 
 Eipening vat, make 
 
 Churn, make 
 
 DIRECTIONS FOR SHIPPING. 
 
 Answer the questions on this method blank carefully. Your answer 
 will help us in criticising your butter. 
 
 Pack butter in 20-lb. collapsible cube or in a cube made from clean. 
 light lumber. The latter should be 9" x 9" x 6" inside dimensions, and 
 is conveniently constructed from material used in the unreturnable 
 butter cases. Line package with parchment paper after paraffining. 
 
 When shipping, place this cube inside a larger one, giving l"-2" 
 space on all sides. The space between should be packed solidly with 
 
paper. Cool cube of butter several hours before its final packing. 
 Never ship directly from churn. 
 
 Attach enclosed shipping tag to your package. .Prepay express. 
 The following score card was used : 
 
 SCORE CARD. 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE. 
 DAIRY INDUSTRY. 
 
 Name 
 
 No. 
 
 BUTTER SCORE CARD. 
 
 Date. 
 
 Perfect 
 
 
 Score 
 
 CHECK 
 
 
 
 FLAVOR 
 
 
 Rancid 
 
 - 
 
 
 Over-ripe Cream 
 
 
 45 
 
 Bitter Cream 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 25 
 
 BODY 
 
 
 Worked Too Much 
 
 Worked Not Enough 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 COLOR 
 
 
 Too High 
 
 Too Light 
 
 
 15 
 
 Mottled 
 
 
 
 Streaked 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 10 
 
 SALT 
 
 
 Too Much 
 
 Not Enough 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PACKING 
 
 
 Poor Packing 
 
 
 5 
 
 
 Poor Package 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 100 
 
 Total 
 
 
 
 % Water 
 Scored by 
 
METHOD OF JUDGING. 
 
 As soon as the entries arrived at the University Farm Creamery, 
 they were assigned a serial number which was recorded, then stripped 
 of all identifying marks and placed in cold storage. A day or so 
 later when placed before the judges, there was nothing to suggest to 
 them the origin of a single entry. In addition to this, the judges 
 worked independently of each other. The scoring was under the 
 direction of Mr. C. L. Mitchell, a representative of the Dairy Division 
 of the United States Department of Agriculture, who employed the 
 standards and methods recommended by that Division. 
 
 First Entry 
 
 One swallow does not make a summer, neither does the data col- 
 lected from one season's contests establish or disprove facts in butter- 
 making. It is hoped, however, that the data presented in the following 
 pages do have value at least in indicating the methods that California 
 buttermakers are employing and why certain individuals are uniformly 
 more successful than others. The data obtained from the method 
 blank accompanying each entry have been arranged in a simple, self- 
 explanatory fashion in the following tables. The score and per cent, 
 of moisture are our own determinations. The other facts are given 
 as reported. In each case, the per cent, of overrun has been computed 
 
from the reported pounds of cream, its per cent, of fat and the pounds 
 of butter made from it. Without stopping to call attention in detail to 
 each table, our purpose, which is to start the buttermaker thinking 
 along right lines, will be served if he will take up each entry separately 
 and trace out the relationship existing between the score, the condition 
 of the cream, its acidity, age, etc., and the way it was handled; i.e., 
 whether it was pasteurized or not, and the amount of starter used. 
 
 First Entry — February 25, 1909. 
 
 Creamery. 
 
 a 
 
 m 
 
 24 
 
 1 
 16 
 23 
 12 
 
 9 
 14 
 18 
 15 
 10 
 
 4 
 19 
 13 
 17 
 
 5 
 
 Gridley Creamery 
 
 Edenco Creamery 
 
 Colusa Butter Co 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co. 
 
 Denman Creamery 
 
 Homestead Creamery Co 
 
 San Pasqual Creamery 
 
 Hicks Valley Creamery 
 
 Pozzi Creamery 
 
 Suisun Creamery 
 
 Tomales Creamery 
 
 Sutter County Creamery 
 
 Good Luck Creamery 
 
 Bay View Creamery 
 
 Rose City Creamery 
 
 Smith's Creamery 
 
 94 
 93% 
 
 93 y 2 
 
 93 % 
 93 
 92 3/ 4 
 
 92% 
 
 92 
 
 92 
 
 92 
 
 91% 
 
 91 
 
 91 
 
 90% 
 
 90 y 2 
 
 90 
 
 88y 2 
 88y 2 
 
 88% 
 88% 
 86% 
 
 13.7 
 13.2 
 13.2 
 
 13.5 
 
 14.2 
 
 11.6 
 
 14.2 
 
 14.5 
 
 15.2 
 13.2 
 14.3 
 
 15 
 
 10 
 10 
 
 20 
 
 10 
 
 frp* 
 
 36. 
 
 36.5 
 
 30. 
 
 32. 
 
 32.5 
 
 31. 
 
 40. 
 
 37.5 
 
 33. 
 
 31.5 
 
 30. 
 
 35. 
 
 30. 
 
 31. 
 
 26.5 
 
 29. 
 
 31. 
 
 35. 
 
 29. 
 
 38. 
 
 1% 
 
 2-4 
 
 3 
 
 1-5 
 
 1-5 
 
 1% 
 
 4-5 
 1-3 
 
 1-3 
 
 6 
 
 3-4 
 
 1-2 
 
 1-2 
 
 1-3 
 
 1-2 
 
 O 
 Old 
 
 Sour 
 Faii- 
 Sour 
 Sweet 
 Good 
 Good 
 Old 
 Fail- 
 Good 
 
 Fail- 
 Fair 
 Fail- 
 Good 
 
 Sour 
 Good 
 Fail- 
 Fair 
 
 .24 
 .48 
 .50 
 
 .58 
 
 .56 
 
 .56 
 
 .56 
 
 & be 
 
 * a 
 
 12 
 
 4 
 14 
 18-24 
 
 1% 
 
 8 
 16 
 18-24 
 
 21 
 
 25 
 19 
 
 15 
 20 
 21 
 
 29 
 
 20 
 16 
 
 Average. 
 
 90.97 13.7 
 
 2% 
 
 12 
 
 20 
 
 The butter in the first entry that scored highest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 Gathered cream which was slightly old, and tested 36% fat, was 
 churned the day after it was received. Fifteen per cent, of starter was 
 added, then it was ripened and cooled to 52°. Churning was continued 
 until the granules reached the size of hazelnuts. The buttermilk 
 temperature was 53° and the wash water 60°. The cream was not 
 
pasteurized. Standard commercial culture and color were used. The 
 cream was ripened in an open vat. 
 
 The butter in the first entry that scored lowest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A fair grade of 38% gathered cream was churned the day after it 
 was received. Its age was from 2-4 days. Only 4% of starter was used 
 in this cream which was ripened to .6% acidity, cooled to 56°, and 
 held 12 hours. Churning was continued until the granules reached the 
 size of wheat kernels. The buttermilk temperature was 57° and the 
 wash water 56°. The cream was not pasteurized but ripened in a 
 modern ripener. A standard commercial culture was used but no 
 artificial color. 
 
 Note the difference between these two in score, age of cream, and 
 per cent, of starter used. Acidity in the latter was too high for such 
 old cream. 
 
 Second Entry — April 23, 1909. 
 
 Creamery. 
 
 Gridley Creamery 
 
 Western Yolo Creamery 
 
 San Pasqual Creamery 
 
 Bay View Creamery 
 
 Ceres Creamery 
 
 Pozzi Creamery 
 
 Edenco Creamery 
 
 Colusa Butter Co 
 
 Suisun Creamery 
 
 Pozzi Creamery 
 
 Rose City Creamery 
 
 Silva's Creamery 
 
 Laton Co-op. Creamery 
 
 Homestead Creamery 
 
 United Creameries 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co. 
 
 Denman Creamery 
 
 Elite Creamery 
 
 Antelope Creamery 
 
 CD 
 f* 
 O 
 
 
 96 
 
 14.5 
 
 95 
 
 14. 
 
 94% 
 
 14. 
 
 94 V 2 
 
 13. 
 
 94 % 
 
 13. 
 
 94 
 
 15.5 
 
 94 
 
 14. 
 
 94 
 
 15. 
 
 93% 
 
 15. 
 
 93 
 
 13.6 
 
 93 
 
 12.2 
 
 92% 
 
 13. 
 
 92 
 
 13. 
 
 92 
 
 15.5 
 
 92 
 
 13. 
 
 91% 
 
 14. 
 
 91% 
 
 13. 
 
 90% 
 
 12.5 
 
 90 
 
 11.5 
 
 89% 
 
 15. 
 
 89 
 
 12. 
 
 89 
 
 13.5 
 
 88% 
 
 14.5 
 
 
 
 3f* 
 
 O ft? 
 
 < C ft 
 
 XM- 
 
 Average. 
 
 13.6 
 
 
 
 2-3 
 
 Sour 
 
 
 5 
 
 
 35. 
 
 
 
 
 24 
 
 
 40. 
 
 %-2 
 
 Fair 
 
 .55 
 
 . 4 
 
 
 30. 
 
 5-7 
 
 Fair 
 
 
 24 
 
 2 
 
 
 1-2 
 
 Sour 
 
 
 12 
 24 
 
 10 
 
 36.5 
 
 3 
 
 
 .43 
 
 18 
 
 12 
 
 32. 
 
 2 
 
 Fair 
 
 .4 
 
 12 
 
 18% ... 
 
 39.4 
 
 1% 
 
 Fair 
 
 .58 
 
 5 
 
 
 32. 
 
 3-5 
 
 Faii- 
 
 
 12 
 
 12 
 
 29. 
 
 3 
 
 Sweet 
 
 .5 
 
 12 
 
 
 40. 
 
 2 
 
 Good 
 
 
 48 
 
 15 
 
 37. 
 
 %-l% 
 
 Sweet 
 
 
 2% 
 
 20 
 
 
 1 
 
 Good 
 
 
 24 
 
 
 32. 
 
 1-2 
 
 Faii- 
 
 
 12 
 
 
 33.5 
 
 3 
 
 Good 
 
 
 18 
 
 20 
 
 39. 
 
 1 
 
 Sweet 
 
 
 
 25 
 
 
 2% 
 
 
 . 5 5 
 
 14 
 
 12 
 
 25.5 
 
 2 
 
 Faii- 
 
 .56 
 
 14 
 
 14 
 
 32. 
 
 2 
 
 Good 
 
 .4 
 
 12 
 
 
 28. 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 12 
 
 10 
 
 40.5 
 
 3-4 
 
 Pair 
 
 .6 
 
 20 
 
 14 
 
 34.2 
 
 2% 
 
 
 .50 
 
 15% 
 
 4> U 
 
 c > 
 fcC 
 
 20 
 
 18 
 20 
 17 
 19 
 
8 
 
 The butter in the second entry that scored highest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 The cream which was partly sour was churned the day after it was 
 received. No starter is reported, though it was probably used. How- 
 ever, the cream was cooled to 51°, held only 5 hours, and churned until 
 the granules were the size of B.B. shot. The buttermilk temperature 
 was 56° and the wash water 57°. A standard culture is reported but 
 no artificial color. 
 
 The butter in the second entry that scored lowest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A fair grade of 40|% cream was churned the day after it was 
 received. It was then three or four days old. Ten per cent, of starter 
 was used, and the cream ripened to .6% acidity and cooled to 59°, and 
 held 20 hours before churning. Churning was continued until the 
 granules reached the size of a kernel of corn. The buttermilk was 60° 
 and the wash water 58°. A standard culture was used but no artificial 
 color. 
 
 Note the difference in time held before churning. Nothing is gained 
 by holding sour cream. Add the starter and churn promptly. Too 
 much acidity was allowed to develop in the cream of the low scoring 
 entry. 
 
 Third Entry— June 11, 1909. 
 
 The butter in the third entry that scored highest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A fair grade of gathered cream testing 32% was churned the day 
 after it was received and was only one day old. Ten per cent, of 
 starter was added; the cream was ripened to .5% acidity, cooled to 
 50° and churned immediately. The buttermilk temperature was 56° 
 and the wash water 58°. Standard culture and artificial color were 
 used. No pasteurization was employed. 
 
 The butter in the third entry that scored lowest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A cream testing 36% was obtained from sweet milk and churned 
 the day following. Twelve per cent, of starter was added; the cream 
 was ripened to .36% acidity, cooled to 54° and churned four hours 
 later. The buttermilk and wash water were 58°. Standard culture 
 and color were used. The cream was not pasteurized. 
 
 The highest scoring butter in this entry was made in accordance 
 with approved practices. Note the temperatures used and the prompt 
 churning. The butter scoring lowest seemed to have conditions in its 
 favor, though it was a small churning. It evidently shows the 
 disastrous effects of uncleanly practices and poor starter upon good 
 cream. 
 
Creamery, 
 
 Colusa Butter Co 
 
 Castroville Creamery Co 
 
 Gridley Creamery 
 
 Pioneer Creamery 
 
 Pozzi Creamery 
 
 "Western Yolo Creamery 
 
 San Pasqual Creamery 
 
 Homestead Creamery 
 
 Elite Creamery 
 
 Edenco Creamery 
 
 Tulare Co-op. Creamery 
 
 Orland Creamery 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co. 
 
 Hicks Valley Creamery 
 
 Salinas Creamery Co 
 
 Rose City Creamery 
 
 Ceres Creamery 
 
 Suisun Creamery Co 
 
 Laton Co-op. Creamery... 
 
 United Creameries 
 
 Average. 
 
 03 
 
 O 
 
 m 
 
 03 
 
 03 
 
 03 
 
 OS 
 
 Oj . 
 
 2 03 
 
 +- SI 
 
 a 03 
 
 95 
 
 12.5 
 
 10 
 
 
 94% 
 
 13.5 
 
 8 
 
 
 94 
 
 13. 
 
 16 
 
 
 93V 2 
 
 15. 
 
 20 
 
 150° 
 
 93% 
 
 12. 
 
 
 
 93 % 
 
 14.3 
 
 
 
 93 
 
 14. 
 
 
 
 93 
 
 14.5 
 
 12 
 
 
 92% 
 
 12. 
 
 20 
 
 
 92 3,4 
 
 12. 
 
 12 
 
 
 92 
 
 13. 
 
 
 
 92 
 
 11. 
 
 
 
 92 
 
 14.5 
 
 
 
 91% 
 
 13. 
 
 12 
 
 
 9iy 2 
 
 13. 
 
 10 
 
 
 91% 
 
 15.3 . 
 
 50 
 
 
 91% 
 
 13.5 
 
 10 
 
 
 91% 
 
 13.5 
 
 20 
 
 
 91% 
 
 12.5 
 
 15 
 
 
 90% 
 
 13. 
 
 
 
 89% 
 
 11.5 
 
 
 
 89% 
 
 12. 
 
 
 
 89 
 
 16.5 
 
 25 
 
 
 89 
 
 13. 
 
 
 
 88 
 
 13. 
 
 12 
 
 
 87 
 
 11. 
 
 12 
 
 
 32. 
 35. 
 32. 
 40. 
 34. 
 35. 
 40. 
 28. 
 29. 
 38. 
 
 23. 
 
 3 7. 
 30. 
 
 35. 
 
 42.3 
 36. 
 
 1 
 1-2 
 
 % 
 2% 
 
 %-2 
 % 
 3 
 1-2 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 1 
 1-2 
 
 %-l% 
 1-2 
 
 O 
 Fair 
 Good 
 Bitter 
 Good 
 Good 
 Fair 
 Faii- 
 Sweet 
 Sweet 
 Good 
 Fair 
 
 Fail- 
 Good 
 
 Good 
 Fair 
 
 .5 
 
 .53 
 
 .65 
 
 .61 
 
 .56 
 
 .54 
 
 .43 
 
 .6 
 .55 
 
 Good 
 Good 
 
 91.67 13.2 
 
 33.1 
 
 1% 
 
 .55 
 
 - r Z. 
 
 9<h3 
 
 — i" 
 
 u \ 
 - - 
 
 
 
 
 24 
 
 22 
 
 6 
 
 
 14 
 
 20 
 
 18 
 
 18 
 
 20 
 
 
 6 
 
 21 
 
 2 
 
 22 
 
 Good 24 
 
 2-3 15 
 
 1-3 Fair .61 12 
 
 1 Sweet .36 4 
 
 12% 
 
 Fourth Entry — August 17, 1909. 
 
 The butter in the fourth entry that scored highest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A 32% cream was obtained from sweet milk delivered daily, and 
 pasteurized at 160°. Twenty per cent, of starter was added, the cream 
 ripened to .6% acidity, cooled to 49° and held 14 hours before churn- 
 ing. The butter was churned to a coarse granular condition and 
 thoroughly washed. The buttermilk temperature was 57° and the 
 wash water 60°. Standard culture and a modern vat were used, but no 
 color. 
 
 The butter in the fourth entry that scored lowest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 The cream was 4-6 days old, testing 40-J% butter-fat. Only 7 per 
 cent, of starter was used; the acidity reached .61%; the cream was 
 then cooled to 50° and held 12 hours before churning. The butter 
 
 21 
 
 is 
 10 
 24 
 
 19 
 
 20 
 
 2 
 
 19 
 
10 
 
 was churned to fine granules, the buttermilk temperature being 59° 
 and the wash water 58°. Standard color and culture were used as well 
 as a modern ripening vat. 
 
 In comparing the above, notice the difference in the amount of 
 starter used in either case, and the age of the cream. In the former 
 there was less need for prompt churning after ripening than in the 
 latter, where the cream had never been under control, as it arrived 
 in bad condition. As shown later under "Cream Ripening," .6% 
 acidity is not too high for 32% cream obtained from sweet milk. 
 What we warn against is the tendency to further ripen cream that is 
 already quite sour and unclean. 
 
 Creamery. 
 
 Pioneer Creamery 
 
 Rose City Creamery 
 
 Tulare Co-op. Creamery 
 
 Suisun Creamery 
 
 Hicks Valley Creamery 
 
 Laton Co-op. Creamery- 
 
 Golden Creamery 
 
 Gridley Creamery... 
 
 Salinas Creamery Co 
 
 Castroville Creamery 
 
 Ceres Creamery 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co. 
 
 Western Yolo Creamery 
 
 Pozzi Creamery 
 
 Homestead Creamery 
 
 San Pasqual Creamery 
 
 95 
 
 941/2 
 
 941/4 
 
 94 
 
 94 
 
 931/2 
 
 931/2 
 
 93 
 
 93 
 
 93 
 
 92 1/2 
 
 921/2 
 
 92 
 
 9iy 2 
 
 91 
 
 91 
 
 89 
 
 88% 
 
 88 
 
 13.5 
 
 12.7 
 
 13.2 
 
 13.9 
 
 13. 
 
 12. 
 
 12.5 
 
 12.5 
 
 14.5 
 
 13.2 
 
 12. 
 
 12. 
 
 13. 
 
 13. 
 
 13. 
 
 12.4 
 
 13.2 
 
 11.1 
 
 12.3 
 
 10 
 25 
 25 
 10 
 15 
 10 
 10 
 40 
 
 20 
 10 
 
 o . 
 
 e S 
 P.J5 
 
 160° 
 
 180< 
 
 32. 
 
 176° 30. 
 
 41.7 
 
 31. 
 
 31. 
 
 33. 
 
 38. 
 30. 
 
 30. 
 
 30. 
 
 37.8 
 
 31. 
 
 40. 
 
 33. 
 40.5 
 
 1/2 Good 
 
 1/2-2 
 1/2 -1% 
 1-3 
 1 
 2 
 
 2-4 
 
 1 
 
 1-2 
 
 1-4 
 
 1-2% 
 1 
 1 
 
 1-3 
 4-6 
 
 Fair 
 Faii- 
 Fair 
 Good 
 Faii- 
 Bitter 
 Good 
 Good 
 Good 
 Fair 
 Faii- 
 
 Sweet 
 Good 
 Good 
 Fail- 
 Old 
 
 Average 92.31 
 
 12.8 
 
 33.9 
 
 iy 2 
 
 57 
 
 61 
 
 t-RC 
 
 3 o a 
 £*£ 
 
 14 
 
 18 
 
 3 
 
 24 
 
 12 
 
 2 
 
 1 
 24 
 14 
 14 
 20 
 
 iy 2 
 
 8 
 
 8 
 24 
 12 
 
 c 
 
 a 
 
 
 20 
 
 22 
 18 
 
 20 
 
 20 
 
 22 
 
 20 
 2 
 
 20 
 
 57 
 
 121/2 
 
 2 
 
 Fifth Entry — October 1, 1909. 
 
 The butter in the fifth entry that scored highest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A fair grade of gathered sweet cream containing 36% of butter-fat 
 was churned when one day old. A twenty per cent, starter was added ; 
 the cream was held at 60° for 4 hours, cooled to 50° and churned 
 immediately to fine granules and well washed. The temperature of 
 the buttermilk was 54° and of the wash water 56°. A modern ripening 
 
11 
 
 vat and standard color and culture were used, but the cream was not 
 pasteurized. The cream was practically sweet. 
 
 The butter in the fifth entry that scored lowest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 One-third sour cream and two-thirds sweet cream testing 30% fat 
 were mixed for this churning. Twelve per cent, of starter was added ; 
 the cream was then ripened, cooled to 60° and held 1^ hours before 
 churning. The cream was churned until butter granules the size of 
 wheat kernels appeared. The buttermilk temperature was 61° and 
 the wash water 62°. Standard color and culture were used and an 
 open ripening vat. 
 
 The mixing of sweet and sour cream, the use of a starter of question- 
 able purity, and the ripening of the cream in a common vat evidently 
 played havoc with quality in the lowest scoring entry. The practices in- 
 dicated in making the highest scoring entry are worth following. Butter 
 for the contest should be representative of the whole amount of cream 
 received. Mixing sweet cream with cream having a clean acid flavor, 
 in order to secure enough for a churning, is not necessarily objection- 
 able providing the mixture is evenly ripened before churning. Where 
 the quantity of each will justify, cream should be graded and the lots 
 churned separately. 
 
 Creamery 
 
 Golden Creamery 
 
 San Pasqual Creamery 
 
 Salinas Creamery Co 
 
 United Creameries 
 
 Hicks Valley Creamery 
 
 Laton Co-op. Creamery 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co. 
 
 Gridley Creamery 
 
 Rose City Creamery 
 
 Ceres Creamery 
 
 Pioneer Creamery 
 
 Suisun Creamery 
 
 Woodland Creamery 
 
 QQ 
 
 96 
 94 
 93 
 92 
 92 
 92 
 
 9iy 2 
 
 91% 
 
 91 
 
 90% 
 
 90% 
 
 90 
 
 90 
 
 89% 
 
 89 
 
 88 
 
 £ 
 
 w 
 
 s 
 
 £> 
 
 14.4 
 
 20 
 
 13.5 
 
 20 
 
 14.1 
 
 20 
 
 13.4 
 
 
 11.9 
 
 40 
 
 12. 
 
 
 12.1 
 
 
 12.9 
 
 
 13.5 
 
 20 
 
 13.4 
 
 10 
 
 14.7 
 
 20 
 
 13.6 
 
 28 
 
 12.9 
 
 
 13.7 
 
 10 
 
 13.3 
 
 10 
 
 12.5 
 
 12 
 
 
 160 ( 
 
 36. 
 42. 
 37. 
 30. 
 30.5 
 
 28. 
 
 34. 
 40. 
 33. 
 38. 
 30. 
 30. 
 
 CREAM. 
 
 G 
 
 c 
 
 
 T3 
 
 G 
 o 
 Q 
 
 'E 
 
 < 
 
 g W 
 <c . 
 
 £•& 
 
 u — 
 
 §«2g 
 
 1 
 
 Fail- 
 
 
 
 
 
 %-l% 
 
 Good 
 
 
 .6 
 
 8 
 
 2-3 
 
 Good 
 Good 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1-5 
 
 Good 
 
 
 
 20 
 
 1-4 
 
 Faii- 
 
 
 
 16 
 
 1-3 
 
 Sour 
 
 
 .5 
 
 12 
 
 1-2 
 
 Faii- 
 
 
 
 14 
 
 % 
 
 Good 
 
 
 .6 
 
 14 
 
 %-l% 
 
 Fail- 
 
 
 .57 
 
 8 
 
 %-l% 
 
 Fair 
 
 
 
 10 
 
 1-3 
 
 Faii- 
 
 
 
 24 
 
 1 
 
 Good 
 
 
 .7 
 
 2 
 
 %-2 
 
 Sweet 
 
 
 
 1% 
 
 20 
 
 20 
 
 23 
 
 20 
 20 
 
 Average. 91.26 
 
 13J 
 
 19.1 
 
 33.7 
 
 1% 
 
 M 
 
12 
 
 Sixth Entry — November 22, 1909. 
 
 H 
 
 1 
 12 
 
 6 
 16 
 18 
 
 11 
 7 
 15 
 10 
 19 
 13 
 14 
 17 
 
 Creamery. 
 
 Pioneer Creamery 
 
 Castroville Creamery 
 
 Golden Creamery 
 
 Meridian Creamery 
 
 San Pasqual Creamery 
 
 Suisun Creamery 
 
 Fresno Cream Co 
 
 Ceres Creamery 
 
 United Creameries 
 
 Salinas Creamery 
 
 Rose City Creamery 
 
 Hicks Valley Creamery 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co. 
 Laton Co-op. Creamery 
 
 m 
 
 ^ 
 
 96 
 
 15.2 
 
 95 y 2 
 
 11.7 
 
 95 
 
 13.6 
 
 94% 
 
 13.2 
 
 94 % 
 
 13. 
 
 94% 
 
 13.1 
 
 93 y 2 
 
 13.7 
 
 93% 
 
 14.8 
 
 93% 
 
 14.2 
 
 93 
 
 13.2 
 
 92% 
 
 14. 
 
 92 
 
 14. 
 
 91 
 
 13.5 
 
 90% 
 
 10.7 
 
 89 
 
 14.8 
 
 86% 
 
 11.3 
 
 86 
 
 12.2 
 
 86 
 
 12.4 
 
 2% 
 
 CCT" 
 
 a* 
 S « 
 EhP-i 
 
 Average. 
 
 92.05 13.3 
 
 25 
 
 160° 
 
 37. 
 
 16 
 
 
 38. 
 
 20 
 
 
 37. 
 
 15 
 
 
 29. 
 
 20 
 
 
 43. 
 
 25 
 
 
 34. 
 
 12 
 
 
 34. 
 
 10 
 
 
 
 20 
 
 
 40. 
 
 20 
 
 
 34. 
 
 17 
 
 
 25. 
 
 10 
 
 
 
 25 
 
 
 31. 
 
 16 
 
 
 31. 
 
 40 
 
 170° 
 
 22. 
 29. 
 
 5 
 
 176° 
 
 35. 
 
 18.5 
 
 
 33.3 
 
 <!t3 
 % 
 1-2 
 1 
 
 O 
 Good 
 Good 
 Good 
 Fair 
 
 ~ 91 
 
 Z 7 
 
 .-: 
 
 .60 
 
 53 - ■ 
 
 14 
 •J 4 
 10 
 
 %-l% 
 
 Fail- 
 
 . 5 6 
 
 4 
 
 1-5 
 
 
 .54 
 
 6 
 
 1 
 
 Good 
 Good 
 
 
 20 
 
 1-3 
 
 Good 
 
 
 3 
 
 2-5 
 
 Sweet 
 
 .5 
 
 9 
 
 1-4 
 
 Faii- 
 
 .6 
 
 12 
 
 1 
 
 Fair 
 
 . 5 5 
 
 14 
 
 
 Good 
 
 .8 
 
 
 3-8 
 
 
 
 24 
 
 1 
 
 Good 
 
 
 2 
 
 11% 
 
 The butter in the sixth entry that scored highest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A 37% cream was obtained from a good grade of whole milk and 
 pasteurized at 160° when 12 hours old, and then cooled to 74°. 
 Twenty-five per cent, of starter was added; acidity developed to .6% ; 
 cooled to 50°, and held 14 hours before churning. The buttermilk had 
 a temperature of 56° and the w 7 ash w T ater 60°. Churning continued 
 until the butter appeared in fine granules, when it w r as thoroughly 
 washed. Standard color and culture, and a modern ripening vat, were 
 used. 
 
 The butter in the sixth entry that scored lowest was made as 
 follows : 
 
 A good grade of gathered cream containing 35.2% fat. and of 
 questionable age, w r as pasteurized at 176° and cooled to 48°. Later it 
 was warmed to 66° and 5 per cent, of starter added, and allowed to 
 ripen until the following morning when it w 7 as cooled to 55° and 
 churned. Butter came in twenty minutes. The temperature of the 
 buttermilk was 56° and the wash water 58°. Standard color and 
 culture were used, as well as a modern ripening vat. Cheap soaps and 
 sal soda were used for washing the cans and the churns. Butter was 
 rated (fishy to oily). 
 
 The noticeable thing in contrasting these two entries is that starters 
 and pasteurization may be abused. Probably neither was responsible 
 
 20 
 
 22 
 
 19 
 
 20 
 18 
 
 15 
 
 22 
 23 
 
13 
 
 for the defects found in the low scoring entry. The result is an objecl 
 lesson. Never use soaps. Purify the churn with lime. 
 
 
 
 
 POINTS 
 
 > CUT. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total Cuts 
 
 Each 
 
 Entry. 
 
 
 Total for 
 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 the Year. 
 
 Flavor 
 
 191% 
 
 165% 
 
 206 
 
 138% 
 
 133 
 
 130% 
 
 965% 
 
 Body 
 
 8% 
 
 5 
 
 6y 2 
 
 4% 
 
 4V 2 
 
 5% 
 
 34% 
 
 Color 
 
 5 
 
 1% 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 1% 
 
 5 
 
 16 
 
 Salt 
 
 1% 
 
 1 
 
 i 
 
 % 
 
 % 
 
 l J /2 
 
 6% 
 
 Package 
 
 1 
 
 2% 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 y 2 
 
 
 
 7% 
 
 
 SUMMARY 
 
 OF SCORE AND CUTS FOR 
 
 THE SIX < 
 
 CONTESTS. 
 
 
 
 
 
 Possible 
 
 
 Total Points 
 
 Per cent. 
 
 
 
 
 Score. 
 
 
 Cut. 
 
 
 cut. 
 
 Flavor 
 
 45 
 
 
 5625 
 
 
 965% 
 
 
 17.2 
 
 Body 
 
 25 
 
 
 3125 
 
 
 34% 
 
 
 1.1 
 
 Color 
 
 15 
 
 
 1875 
 
 
 16 
 
 
 0.9 
 
 Salt 
 
 10 
 
 
 1250 
 
 
 6% 
 
 
 0.5 
 
 Package 
 
 5 
 
 
 625 
 
 
 7^4 
 
 
 1.2 
 
 TABLE SHOWING THE DISTRIBUTION OF CUTS FOR TEN BUTTERMAKERS 
 DURING THE SIX CONTESTS. 
 
 No. 1. 
 
 No. 
 
 No. 3. 
 
 No. 4. 
 
 No. 5. 
 
 
 
 
 ENTRIES 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ENTRIES. 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 F 
 
 6 
 
 6 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 7i 
 
 61 
 
 81 
 
 6 
 
 9 
 
 5 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 C 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 
 
 6. 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 P 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 6 
 
 4 
 
 6 
 
 61 
 
 8 
 
 5i 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 7 
 
 6 
 
 7 
 
 51 
 
 8 
 
 7 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 B 
 
 2 
 
 1 
 
 u 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 
 No. 
 
 7. 
 
 C 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 71 
 
 5 
 
 7 
 
 7 
 
 6 
 
 5| 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 ioi 
 
 10 J 
 
 8 
 
 52 
 
 11 
 
 ID 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 C 
 
 
 T 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 No. 
 
 8. 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 P 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 6J 
 
 8 
 
 7 
 
 7 
 
 81 
 
 8 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 10 J 
 
 71 
 
 8 
 
 61 
 
 - 
 
 8 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 B 
 
 1 
 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 
 
 9. 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 p 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 P 
 
 
 X 
 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 7 
 
 
 8 
 
 6 
 
 7 
 
 12 
 
 
 
 F 
 
 10 
 
 51 
 
 8i 
 
 71 
 
 9 
 
 61 
 
 B 
 
 
 
 
 
 2 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 B 
 
 l 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 C 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 No. 
 
 10. 
 
 C 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 t 
 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 P 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
14 
 
 AVERAGE DATA FOR EACH OF THE SIX CONTESTS. 
 
 Contests. 12 3 4 5 6 
 
 Score 90.97 92.34 91.67 92.31 91.26 92.05 
 
 Percent, Water 13.7 13.6 13.2 12.8 13.2 13.3 
 
 Per cent. Starter 8. 14. 16. 16. 19.1 18.5 
 
 Number using Starter 12 12 16 13 11 16 
 
 Number Pasteurizing 13 2 3 
 
 Cream, per cent Fat 32.7 34.2 33.1 33.9 33.7 33.3 
 
 Cream, Age-days 2% 2% l 1 ^ iy, iy 2 2 
 
 Cream, % Acidity ripened.. .52 .50 .55 .57 .59 .56 
 
 Hours held 12 15% 12y 2 12% 11 liy 2 
 
 Per cent. Overrun 20 20 19 20 *20 20 
 
 Note the gradual increase in the amount of starter used as the 
 contest progressed. There is also shown an increase in the number of 
 buttermakers interested in starters and pasteurization. 
 
 Educational Butter Scoring Contest, 1909. 
 scores — prizes — certificates. 
 
 1st 2d 3d 4th 5th 6th Ave. Buttermaker 
 
 Creamery. Order. Entry. Entry. Entry. Entry. Entry. Entry. Score. Received. 
 
 Colusa Butter Co., Colusa 1 93 % 94 95 1st Prize & 
 
 Golden Creamery, Etna Mills 93% 96 95 94.5 Certificate. 
 
 Gridley Creamery, Gridley 2 94 96 94 93 91% 94% 93.8 2d Prize & 
 
 Certificate. 
 San Pasqual Creamery, Escon- 
 
 dido 3 92% 94% 93 91 94 94% 93.2 Certificate. 
 
 Suisun Creamery, Suisun 4 92 93 % 91% 94 90 94 % 92.5 Certificate. 
 
 Rose City Creamery, Chico 5 90% 93 91% 94% 91 92% 92.1 Certificate. 
 
 Crystal Cream & Butter Co., 
 
 Sacramento 6 93% 91% 92 92% 91% 91 92.0 Certificate. 
 
 The above table shows the creameries at which the butter was made 
 in the first year's contest, that won for the buttermakers either prizes 
 or certificates. 
 
 In connection with reporting the results of this first year 's contest, 
 we are tempted to make some rather complete suggestions on the care 
 and handling of milk and cream under California conditions which, 
 if applied seriously, would greatly improve the quality of our butter. 
 However, as this material will appear in another circular, only the 
 briefest sort of an outline of a few important things to be borne in 
 mind is here appended. It is to the ambitious buttermaker, who is 
 unrestrained by commercial greed, that we look for much of the educa- 
 tional uplift we need in dairy and creamery work. The results of the 
 contest here reported we hope will encourage all California creamery 
 
15 
 
 men to renewed efforts as the secret of making good butter may, after 
 all, be reduced to a few simple principles. It is to sustain interest in 
 these essential things and to help the buttermaker in impressing them 
 upon his patrons and others with whom he necessarily comes in contact 
 that the following is offered : 
 
 Prize Cups. 
 
 FACTORS CONCERNED IN IMPROVING THE SUPPLY OF CREAM 
 
 AND BUTTER. 
 
 CARE ON THE FARM. 
 
 1. 
 
 ment 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 
 Sound cows; wholesome and regular food supply; kind treat- 
 
 Clean, well-lighted stables ; firm, dry yards and surroundings. 
 
 Removal of accumulated manure daily. 
 
 Soiled cows must be washed before milking. Milkers should 
 
 wash hands frequently, wear clean clothing and milk with dry hands. 
 
 5. Utensils for milk or cream must be simple in construction, easily 
 
 cleaned, and kept in a sanitary place. A suitable place for washing 
 
 and scalding all utensils is absolutely essential. 
 
16 
 
 6. A clean, well-lighted and ventilated milk house must be provided 
 (preferably) outside the barn, where the milk may be handled and the 
 cream kept cool until delivery. 
 
 7. The separator must be thoroughly washed and scalded each time 
 it is used. 
 
 8. The separator should be run carefully at the prescribed speed at 
 all times, to avoid loss. 
 
 9. A rich cream, about 35% butter-fat, gives best results. 
 10. Cream must be cooled immediately after it is separated. 
 
 DELIVERY OF CREAM OR MILK. 
 
 1. Deliveries should be frequent : 
 
 Milk daily; cream daily, if possible. 
 
 2. Holding cream three or four days, where conditions are in- 
 adequate for proper cooling and storage, renders it unfit for making 
 good butter. . 
 
 3. In hot weather, cream to be hauled long distances should always 
 be protected from the sun, and the cans should each be provided with 
 burlap or felt covers to keep out the heat. 
 
 4. When shipping by rail, the cream should be kept in the shade 
 at transfer points. 
 
 5. No shipper, distributor, retailer, or manufacturer, should be per- 
 mitted to return unclean or unsanitary cans to his patrons. Such a 
 practice should be considered a misdemeanor, and dealt with accord- 
 ingly. 
 
 CARE AT THE CREAMERY. 
 
 1. Cream grading is essential. Pay for cream on the basis of its 
 butter-fat content and its sanitary condition. 
 
 2. Don't accept bad cream. Let your unwise competitor have it. 
 
 3. Learn to make good starters and how to properly apply them. 
 
 4. Learn the use and value of the acid test. 
 
 5. Study the principles and practice of pasteurization. 
 
 6. Exercise a reasonable control over churning conditions so that 
 the resulting butter will be of an approved, uniform composition. 
 
 7. The buttermaker must keep himself and the creamery clean in 
 every particular. 
 
17 
 
 GENERAL SUGGESTIONS. 
 CREAM GRADING. 
 
 If the foregoing figures show anything, they indicate that butter 
 of good quality cannot be made from cream produced or subsequently 
 handled in an unsanitary manner. If the natural, rich, sweet flavor 
 of cream has in any way been lost by the contamination of the milk or 
 cream, or by neglect in handling, the butter suffers thereby. Inferior 
 cream can never be worth as much for butter-making as first-class 
 cream, except where the butter may be consumed by persons with 
 uneducated or perverted appetites. In the average creamery, the poor 
 cream received pulls down, unjustly, the quality which the careful 
 patrons are trying so hard to sustain. If the reader will take the time 
 to go through the data here submitted, he will find numerous cases 
 where the conscientious buttermaker has employed all the means at his 
 command to make a respectable grade of butter from cream that was 
 abused before it reached his platform — and he has failed. Such butter 
 uniformly scores low. What an argument this is for rational grading 
 and payment on the quality as well as the butter- fat basis ! Milk and 
 cream for direct consumption are in effect graded before they are sold. 
 The same is true of butter, cheese, and numerous other food products : 
 the consumer refusing to pay good money for poor products if he 
 knows it. Why should not the same logic hold for cream used in 
 butter-making? If the producer of clean milk is entitled to a premium 
 over his dirty competitor, the patron who delivers a clean, wholesome 
 grade of cream is entitled to a better price than his careless associate. 
 Paying a uniform price for all grades of cream, as is the general 
 practice in California creameries, is an ingenious device for the per- 
 petuation of bad methods, bad cream, and bad butter. The good cream 
 will come when there is a difference in price to attract it. The most 
 unpromising feature of the quality situation is an over-zealousness on 
 the part of creameries to obtain any and all kinds of cream. 
 
 STARTERS. 
 
 As the contest progressed, the beneficial results of an aroused 
 interest in starters became apparent, Not all starters are good, and 
 such as are not often do serious harm. By the careful propagation and 
 use of a standard commercial culture in clean skim milk with proper 
 attention to cleanliness and temperatures, the quality of the butter is 
 invariably improved. Frequent reinoculation into fresh pasteurized 
 
18 
 
 skim milk is essential to the vitality, purity, and effectiveness of the 
 starter. While in ripening fairly sweet cream for churning it may be 
 desirable to add the starter several hours before churning time, to 
 insure sufficient production of acid and flavor, this seems not to be 
 desirable with cream already too sour for churning. In such cases, the 
 opportunity for the starter to effect improvement is greatly reduced, 
 though it may still do considerable to enhance the flavor. With the 
 poorer grades of hand separator cream, the sooner they can be churned 
 after being brought to the proper temperature the better. For this 
 reason, starter is often added to the churn in as liberal amounts as the 
 cream will stand and churning proceeded with immediately. Where 
 a chance for ripening is permitted, it is seldom more than two or three 
 hours. It seems that some of our most successful buttermakers plan 
 to receive and ripen their cream, churn and mould their butter, all in 
 the same day. It is evident that a number of contestants allowed their 
 cream, which was poor when received, to ripen too much before 
 churning. 
 
 There seems to be no very satisfactory substitute for skim milk as 
 a medium in which to propagate a starter. Many of our buttermakers 
 complain of difficulty in obtaining enough skim milk for this purpose. 
 It is true that the addition of a twenty-five per cent, starter in our large 
 creameries means considerable skim milk, but it is worth the effort to 
 go to some trouble in getting it. 
 
 CREAM RIPENING. 
 
 The acid test and a knowledge of its application are essential to 
 systematic work in the creamery. Most creameries have modern 
 ripeners and one or two forms of acid tests. They should be used in 
 conjunction with each other to the end that the acidity be kept in 
 control. To be of equal ripeness, rich cream should show less acidity 
 than thin cream. Some of the contestants were careless about making 
 acidity tests, while still others made no tests at all. The acid test is 
 a guide to ripeness and should be followed closely. Don't insist on 
 ripening cream that is already too ripe. The following serves as a 
 useful guide to the amount of acid that may be safely developed in 
 creams of different richness : 
 
 Per cent. Fat. Per cent. Acid. 
 
 20 .72 
 
 30 .63 
 
 40 .54 
 
 50 .45 
 
 In commercial starter, .70 to .80 
 
19 
 
 PASTEURIZATION. 
 
 The* interest in this phase of buttermaking is growing faster than 
 our data would seem to indicate. With the present tendencies in 
 cream production, the practice is almost compulsory, and, where 
 properly carried on, has given positively beneficial results. It would 
 seem that the time is near at hand when every creamery will pasteurize 
 its cream for buttermaking. However, pasteurization evidently serves 
 no end as far as its effect upon quality is concerned, which could not 
 be attained by better methods of producing and handling the cream. 
 The temperature employed varies from 140° F.-180 F. continuous 
 flow, followed by rapid cooling. It has been found disastrous to cool 
 immediately to as low as 40° F. By cooling first to 70°, certain 
 defects and faults, otherwise produced, are obviated. A starter should 
 always be used in cream which has been pasteurized, to control the 
 flavor. Its omission will produce bad results, as the heating partially 
 clears the field for the effective work of starter. 
 
 COMPOSITION OF BUTTER. 
 
 This varies according to certain recognized conditions. While the 
 creamery operator is entitled to a liberal yield, he must keep within 
 prescribed limits of composition. The placing of 16% as the maxi- 
 mum water content of butter permissible under the present law, has 
 called attention in recent years to the control of w T ater in butter and 
 its effect upon the composition, keeping quality, and flavor of the 
 same. A recent, carefully prepared Experiment Station bulletin* 
 sums up some of these factors in a broad, general way, as follows : 
 
 1. It is possible to make butter from day to day of uniform and 
 desired composition. 
 
 2. There was no variation in water content between half worked 
 and worked butter, or after the third revolution of the churn until 
 working was completed. 
 
 3. There was no difference in composition of samples taken from 
 the middle or either end of the churn. 
 
 4. The per cent, of water in butter is affected by the make of churn. 
 
 5. There was no difference in composition of butter made from 
 cream held 1-3 hours and that held 12-15 hours at churning tempera- 
 ture. 
 
 * Illinois Agr. Exp. Station Bulletin 137. 
 
20 
 
 6. Butter of the same composition can be made from either pas- 
 teurized or unpasteurized cream. 
 
 7. Dry and wet salting methods are identical as far as composition 
 is concerned. 
 
 8. Churning butter washed with water, differing ten degrees in 
 temperature, produced butter with an average difference in water 
 content in forty comparisons of 1.99 ^ . 
 
 9. In terms of averages, samples taken from the butter in the churn 
 will contain nearly one per cent, more moisture than samples taken 
 from the butter in the tubs. The same decrease is true of samples 
 taken from tubs of butter before and after storage. 
 
 10. There is a variation in the water content ranging from 0.1 to 
 1.0% between different samples representing the same butter. 
 
 Each buttermaker must determine the details of practice that best 
 suit his local conditions, and with those under control he should have 
 little trouble in producing butter of uniform composition. 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. 
 
 The Dairy Division of the United States Department of Agricul- 
 ture has assisted us greatly in the Scoring Contest by permitting its 
 representative to engage in scoring the entries. 
 
 The contributions of various supply men, commission merchants, 
 and others to the premium fund has materially strengthened interest 
 in the contest. 
 
 EDUCATIONAL SCOEING CONTEST, 1910. 
 
 During 1910, the contest will be continued along lines as above 
 indicated. Probably more prizes will be offered than in 1909. All 
 California buttermakers are invited to participate. Address com- 
 munications concerning the contest to 
 
 Dairy Industry, 
 
 University Farm, 
 
 Davis, California.