iaii \r: ft" *■ iS^-''^^-^'^<^ 1-'- iillinriii 'j^ < ' '' "^ > 1 ISAAC FOOT 61 'K THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE LAFAYETTES THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE LAFAYETTES By EDITH SICHEL AUTHOR OF "CATHERINE DE MEDICI AND THE FRENCH REFORMATION'* "THE LATER YEARS OF CATHERINE DE MEDICI " " WOMEN AND MEN OF THE FRENCH RENAISSANCE " ETC. LONDON CONSTABLE & COMPANY LTD 1910 EDITION Contents PAGB Introduction « ■ • 3 CHAPTER I The d'Ayens ■ • ■ • Si CHAPTER n Lafayettb • • SS CHAPTER III Before the Revoi.utiox .83 CHAPTKi; IV The Revolution 103 CHAPTER V The Eve of the Ti:rror 127 CHAPTER VI Arrest . • 159 CIIAI^']"Kii \TI The Prisons of the Revolution 191 CONTENTS CHAPTER VIII ,^aa Emigres and Captives ......«• 227 CHAPTER IX Repose ........... 253 CHAPTER X Lafayette and Napoleon 277 CHAPTER XI Before the End 301 CHAPTER XII Conclusion 329 Introduction INTRODUCTION MUCH has been said, much has been written about the Ancien R(5gime — that shadowy system from which we are separated by the Gulf of the French Revolu- tion. History, fiction, poetry, philosophy have all busied themselves with it. It has acquired for us a conventional glamour, an almost legendary power, and we have done much to transfer it from solid historical ground to the domain of Magic — a picture-book country where every- body moves romantically and morals do not exist. To the unversed majority the Ancien Regime conveys an impression of enchanted vice and sensational starvation ; cupids and serfs ; deep curtseys, minuets, and high heels that crush human beings beneath them ; wax candles and intrigues ; ladies in patches and powder playing at les Graces with gentlemen in three-cornered hats and pink satin waistcoats— gentlemen who bought their clothes out of taxes wrung from the poor, and occasionally hunted their peasants instead of stags. Yet Human Nature, the one criterion we possess by which to judge unknown generations, was the same then as now, though it existed under different conditions ; and Human Nature, when consulted, can hardly accept as probable the strange pageant that our fancy too readily adopts. The reason is not far to seek. " Thfe evil that men do lives after them"; the lurid exceptions in human history are easiest 3 THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE LAFAYETTES to remember ; its unconspicuous normal side naturally slips out of sight. The vice, so much dwelled on, was certainly no fiction. There was a corrupt Court Party, whose vagaries can hardly be overstated ; but then there were almost as large a number of nobles — some Catholic, some philosophical — who led lives of saintly virtue and religious fervour — such virtue that it seems as if it should have saved the City. Still the mass belonged to the vast world of the Entre- deux, and spent average quiescent existences, good- naturedly enough, under a system which they never stopped to question. They did as others did, judging good and evil by the standards of the majority, and effected neither directly, much like their counterparts in our own day. We only seem less selfish because the public opinion that controls us has reached a higher plane, and to sink below the prescribed level often requires as much originality as to rise above it. Indeed, the aspira- tions, if not the actions, of the ordinary French noble of 1750 were usually strung at a far higher pitch than those of our contemporaries ; as a matter of fashion, he was penetrated by his Rousseau and his Voltaire, and there was more nobility of sentiment, even amongst the com- monplace of his class, than at any other period. The mistake in the popular picture of the Ancien Regime is easy to discover, and still easier to make. It is a common blunder. The people portrayed are con- founded with the system under which they lived. With this system, in all its details and its anomalies, every reader of De Tocqueville or Carlyle is familiar ; nor do we propose here to deal with it. Our task is a more congenial one. It lies with the personalities who make the exceptions to the rule, and with a restricted number 4 INTRODUCTION amongst those personalities. We have already spoken of the two extremes of aristocratic Society — of the (Eil-de- Bccuf, and of the company, so much less known, of holy- minded men and women irradiating the last years of the old order. Excepting by the readers of Memoirs, their names are seldom heard. Yet their actions still " smell sweet and blossom in the dust," if we will but stoop to pick them up. Their lives are recorded, often in detail — lives as exalted and as full of suffering as those of the canonized Martyrs, and better reading than theirs, be- cause they combine Christian sacrifice with social grace, and austerity with s)mpathy ; because their unction was of the heart, and sweetened not only their manners, but their inmost thoughts. The most winning of them are certainly to be found amongst the orthodox religious ; their personal piety has a distinction, an attraction, of its own. But they counted in their ranks philosophers, whose conduct was as pure and self-renouncing ; men who were practically more effec- tive, because more occupied with theories of enlighten- ment, and with public affairs. Of the former type, the De Noailles family are representative ; Lafayette and his friends are a fine embodiment of the latter. In an endeavour to revive in some of its charm and purity the figure of Adrienne d'Ayen, who afterwards became Madame de Lafayette, we shall have the best opportunity of seeing the two sides united. But stars can only be measured by their relation to lesser lights ; a study of the average mind is almost necessary to our full comprclicnsion of heroic souls. And it is only by understanding the social conditions of any period that we can do justice to the characters that lived under them, especially those of larger mould, who tried 5 THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE LAFAYETTES to master or to ennoble them. Biography, without this knowledge, has no more truth or vitality than a sermon on a text apart from its context. It will therefore, we hope, be pardoned us, if before assuming the directer functions of biography, we pause to look round and to take a bird's-eye view, however rapidly, of the aristocratic world as it then existed. That brilliant world was contained within the gates of Paris. There all the nobles congregated : Paris made their aims ; Paris made their pleasures. The roads from the city to the provinces were mere cart-ruts that looked as if a gentilhomme' s coach could never roll along them Unless it were to amuse a Parisian party by a boar-hunt and to fill their halls with the tinkle of Parisian witticisms, these grandees never approached their lands of their own free will. The iron persuasion of a lettre de cachet could alone induce them to remain there, and the two estates that were exceptions in prosperity were those of the exiled Dues de Choiseul and d'Aiguillon. It is only when we realize how stationary gentlemen then were, that we under- stand how they found time for incessant society, copious letter-writing and absorbing friendships. They did not so much as stir out of Paris with their families in the summer, till late in the eighteenth century ; and even then the annual visit to the country gave them no pleasure. Like all French arrangements of that day, it became an intellectual institution, due to the prevailing Anglomanie, Tx.n(\ still more to the influence of Rousseau. Nature meant to them no joy of hill and woodland, but a Theory of Education and a Social Millennium. Small wonder, then, that Arthur Young, travelling southwards in the France of 1787 covered 270 miles without meeting a single gentlemaa " Heaven grant me patience," cries that sturdy farmer, 6 INTRODUCTION " while I see a country thus neglected, and forgive me the oaths I swear at the absence and ignorance of the possessors ! " Yet those possessors were usually kindly men, although they left reckless substitutes in their Intendants. There is a story told of the Prince de Conti, who had a great reputation for cruelty. He was going to Mass with some ladies, when his bailiff came and informed him that a poacher had just been taken in the grounds of the chateau. He asked what he should do with him. " Give him a hundred stripes and imprison him in a dungeon for two years," was the prompt reply in unanswerable tones. One of the ladies, overflowing with sensibility, almost fainted, for she knew the poacher had a large family. She went to the bailiff to see what could be done. He laughed in her face. " The Prince only said that to keep up his reputation," he exclaimed. " His Royal Highness came to me directly after Mass, and begged me to see that the poor wretch was only sent away from the neighbourhood for two months, and that his family was well looked after during his absence." The Prince was no exception. Many of the high-souled jeunesse dor^e, who talked and walked, doubted and dreamed in the broad Places of their Paris, would have resented the wrongs done to the peasants, could they have grasped those wrongs as abstract ideas. It is but fair to them to remember that, apart from court duties, they were attracted to the city as much by intel- lect as by pleasure. There ideas vibrated ; there mind f(jund mind, and struck electric sparks ; there gathered, so it seemed to them, the men who could help mankind. Indeed, never before had there been such a Cult of Liberty. The youth of France dreamed they had drunk of a golden cup, and they were intoxicated. They wept, 7 THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE LAFAYETTES they perorated, they crowned each other with bay-leaves, they embraced — they beh'eved. Any cause that presented itself in the name of Freedom was welcomed by them with acclamation, and without enquiry, whether it was emanci- pation from slavery or from the marriage laws, restitu- tion of civil rights to the Protestants, or destruction of the altars of the Church. When America declared its independence, young Paris took fire, braved disinheritance, and offered its aid without interest or reserve. Voltaire blessed Benjamin Franklin's son ; it was one of his last actions, and the young men hailed it as a fitting consummation of his life. There was "a rage for simplicity" — a feeling too complex for its object. When Silas Deane and Arthur Lee, the American envoys, came over to Paris, with unpowdered hair and plain dark cloth coats, moving, we are told, like dignified farmers amidst this scintillating world, the young men of Versailles wanted to give up toupets and to adopt fustian. They would willingly have worn rags and eaten dry bread if they could have helped negroes, Huguenots, or abstract victims by such sacrifice. The only things they never thought of giving up were their privileges, their taxes and their game laws ; the only people they never dreamed of delivering, the haggard race at their gates. The intellectual part of their enthusiasm was the most successful. Events fostered it. Montesquieu had un- earthed many popular rights ; his Esprit des Lois became an object of earnest study. The Parlements of Paris were restored after a lapse of years by the callous old Maurepas, desirous of ease with all parties, and ignorant of the ball he had set rolling. Constitutional ideas became the fashion and England the rage ; English habits, English books, English drama, English dress were de Jiaut ton. The rain- 8 INTRODUCTION bow satins and frilled gilets, which had stood out in strong contrast to the black coats of the working classes, disap- peared before the levelling British frac, worn by all con- ditions of men. It even replaced the menial liveries, to the fury of the old peers at Versailles, who considered this as the high-water mark of degeneration. English simplicity was not enough for the younger spirits ; in their zeal for our moderation, they also adopted our luxuries. Racing al- most ousted gambling ; English lords came over with their horses, and taught French marquises how to breed them. The horses were soon followed by their attendant Jokeis — a wizened race of children stunted w ith drugs and wrapped in blankets to keep them of a proper size for their profession. The enthusiasm for the Turf was only rivalled by that for Freedom. Louis XVI. alone disapproved and refused to bet more than an eai upon a winning horse ; but his pro- test fell unheeded on the radiant luxury around him. Life had a fantastic charm for those who could pass so lightly from dream to reality ; from the " vague du salon " to the " rc'e/ du cabinet" at a time when between class and class " there was great familiarity and no equality," as the young Comte de S(^gur wrote in after years. " Liberty, royalty, aristocracy, democracy, prejudice, reason, novelty, philo- sophy ! " he exclaims, " never was awakening preceded by a sweeter sleep or more alluring dreams. ... In our chateaux, with peasants, guards, and bailiffs, we still found some vestige of our ancient feudal power ; at court and in town we enjoyed the distinctions of birth, . . . and yet, henceforth we could mix without pomp or trammel with our fellow-citizens, and enjoy all the gentleness of equalit)' with our peasants." Zeal for Humanity brought zeal for Science in its train. Science and all its semblances — astrology, chemistry, 9 THE HOUSEHOLD OF THE LAFAYETTES magnetism, and medicine — existed only to alleviate the sufferings of men. The same high-souled jumble corv. tinned. When the first balloon was sent up from the Tuileries Gardens, with Chemist Charles and Robert inside it, the applauding crowd was moved to tears ; relief of all distress was now to be instantaneous ; the arts of warfare were to be changed, towns besieged, and England invaded by balloon ; and sanguine ladies dreamed more selfishly, but not more irrationally, of Corsairs descending and romantic aerial courtships. The aeronauts were hailed as gods ; with the increase of material prosperity, men grew indeed to consider themselves as gods, secure and almost immortal. On the one hand, we find serious students and discoverers making solid progress in knowledge : Lavoisier in his laboratory, Laplace and Lagrange in their observatories, Cuvier and Buffon in the Jardin des Plantes ; on the other hand, appraised at the same value as themselves, stands a crowd of scientific virtuosi ; sincere charlatans and insin- cere charlatans, each with his panacea for the world's ills encased in big theory or small phial ; each believed in with the whole faith of the impressionable Parisian nature. And over all, glorifying dupes and even deceivers, burned this newly-kindled flame of philanthropy, the feeling for pain, the determination to abolish it. Most of the men who made empiric experiments in this cause, believed in them truly ; they were guilty of credulity rather than of dishonesty — of confused and undisciplined minds rather than of lawlessness. A certain aristocrat named Lauragrais, who brought over the first Jokei, was typical of the majority. Enormously rich, he had run through all the sensations of Paris, with enough nobility of nature to make a cynic of himself instead of a ral