« %^ ^ 11 0^ ^ v.^ 5jt '?* i» -^-Si !^ ^S^ I 0-^ 15 FROM THE c o I T T E O F vs E c R E c y. Appointed to Enquire into the CONDUCT of ROBERT Earl of OR FORD, During the laft Ten Years of his being Firft Commiflioner of the Treafury, and Chancellor and Under -Trealurer of His MAJESTY'S Exchequer. Puhltjhed by Order of the House of Commons. LONDON', Printed for Thomas Co;: under the Royal Exchanoe in CoryjhtUt Ch A R L E s t>A T H L R s T cv*; ale Croji Kc^s, and John Pemberton at the Buck in Fleet-Hreet. MDCCXLII. Jovis 13 Die Maii, 1742. BT lArtue of an Order of the Houfe of Commonsy this Day made, I do appoint Thomas Coy, Charles Bathurft, and John Pemberton to print this Report, with the Appendix ; and that no other Per/on do prefume to print the fame. Ar' Onslow, Speaker. ( I ) A ' REPORT From the Committee of Secrecy, Made on Thurfday the 13 th Day of Ma'y^ 1742. "^ '7' O U R Committee finding themfdves obflrufted in their En- ^' quiry, by the obftinacy of Mr. Nicholas Paxton upon his fe- ■ veral Examinations, are under a Neccdity of laying that whole Tranfadion before the Houfe, (together with a fhort State of his Beha- viour, as Solicitor of the Treafury and a pubhc Accomptant) as alfo an Account of the Behaviour of GwynVaughan Efquire, on his Exami- nation. Your Committee now think proper, in order to avoid Repetition, to ac- quaint the Houfe, that, in purfuance of their Orders, all the Perfons exa- mined before the faid Committee, were examined in the mod folemn Man- ner-, and Mr. M/V/jj^/ GiWow being examined, faid, he was Agent to 7(?/6;/ Bolder Efquire, who flood Candidate at the Eledlion for a Member of Parliament for the Borough of TFendover in the County of Bucks, in 1755-, that Mr. Boteler did, the Saturday Night before it came on, ad- vife with the Examinant, what was proper to be done -, that the Exami- nant told him, nothing could be done without 5 or 600/. that on this, he believes, y[r. Bolder to\<\ him, that he had not fo much Money, but he would write a Letter to Mr. Paxton; that the next Morning one Mr. John Jones, who was a Friend of Mr. Boteler\, was fent to Lon- don, and returned on the Monday Morning to TFendover, and on his Return told the Examinant, that he had delivered a Letter to Mr. Pax- ton, and Mr. Paxton had given him 500/. he having at the fame time in his Hand great Numbers of Bank Notes, which he told the Exami- nant was the 500/. in Queftion, and which he immediately carried in to Mr. Bt'teler, who foon after came out, and informed the Examinant the 500/. was come, Mr. John Jones, being examined, faid, that he had no Intereft in the Borough of fFoidover, but was employed by Mr. Bolder as a Friend ; that, before the Day of the Ek(5tion, Mr. Boteler defired the Examinant B to 1 o:^.9p.of) ( ^ ) •to gc to Town with a Letter to Mr. Nicholas Paxlofi for Money; that he tbund Mr. Paxton at Fulham, and gave him the Letter, and Mr. :P-axt6n^ on reading it, defired the Examinant to meet !iim the next '■Day at Roger IVilliam/^ ColFee-houfe ; th:U he did meet him according- Jy, and Mr. Paxton gave him a Parcel of Money (of which tlie great- • eft Part, if not the whole, was in Bank Notes) and told him, on deli- • veringit, " Here is your Anfwcr-, " the Sum, he believes, might be about • 500/. that he carried it the lame Morning to JVendovrr, and delivered the fime, or the greatcft Part thereof, to Mr. Boteler. John Bote! er Efquire being examined, faid, that, when he ftood Can- didate at fi-^endover, in 1735, he did, on occafion of that Election, and not long before it, make an Acquaintance with Mr. Paxton Sollicitor to the Treafury •, that the Examinant was pufhed at the Election, and v/anted Money, and thinking he had fome Pretenfions to Favour, on account of his having been ill uf.'d in his former Eleftion, and knowing Mr. Paxtcn was a Pcrfon about the Treafury that might have an Interelt where the Money might be had, the Examinant, as he could not come away from JVcndover without Money to defray his Charges, fcnt Mr. John Jones to London, with a Meflage to Mr. Paxton for Money, which MefHige, the Examinant believes, was a Letter for 500/. that Mr. Jones returned with the Money to the Examinant a little before the Eledion ; that the Examinant did never give either Bond, Note, or Receipt for the Money, nor has Mr. Paxton at any Time fince made a Demand either of the money, or any Security for the fame, no- did he confider himfclf as a Debtor for the Sum thus received. Mr. Nicholas Paxton being examined, faid, that he knows Mr. John Jones very well, and has known liim for fome Years ; that he likewife knows Mr. Boteler, formerly a Candidate at (Vendover, and has known him feveral Years; he believes, that Mr. Boteler flood Candidate for JVendover in the Year 1735, but that he was not an Agent for Mr. Boteler, Mr. Paxton being further afked, if he advanced any Money to Mr. Jones, on the Account of Mr. Boteler, about the Time of that Ekcftion.; He faid, " I will notanfwer that Queftion, as it may tend to accufe myfelf. " The Comniittee defired he would ccnfider of it. To which he an- fwered, " I defire no Time to confider of it." Then he was ordered to withdraw. And bei.g again called in, the Queftion xvas read to him, and he was informed by the Chairman, that it was the unanimous Opinion of the Committee, that an Aniwcr to this Queftion did not tend to accufe himfelf ; and therefore the Committee did infill on an Anfwer. To which He faid, " I defire to be excufed." Then he was again ordered to withdraw. And being agiin called in, the Chairman repeated the Queftion to him, and informed him, that the Committee did infift on an An- fwer, and would not excufe him. To which He faid, " I will not an'w^r that Queftion-," and. perfifting in his Refufal, was ordered to withdraw. Mr. Paxton being, on the nextDav, taken into the Cuftody of the Ser- jeant at Arms, by Ordu of the Houfc, was on the Day following, brought (3) brought before the Committee, in Order to be examined, and being jigain aflvcd, if he did advance any Money to Mr. John Joires, on the Account of Mr. Botekr, about the Time of the Elecflion at IVcndovery in the Year 1735. He fiid, "• 1 adhere to my former Anfwer ; " upon which he was or- dered to withdraw. And being again called in, the Chairman by the Dircftion of the Com- mittee, repeated the fame Queflion to him, and acquainted him, that they expefted he fhould give a pofitive Anfwer thereto. Upon which He fa id, " If you will have me give a pofitive Anfv/er, I do fay, I will not anfwer that Qutftion, as it may tend to accufe myfelf " Your Committee in the next Place, proceeded to examine Mr. Rich- ard Banks, late Partner with Mr. Paxton, who laid, that he became a Partner in Bufinefs with the faid Mr. Paxton, about the Year 173 1 or 1732, and continued toadlv;iih him as fuch, till within thefefouror five Years -, that in their private Bufinefs he (Banks) generally received the Money from the Clients, tho' not always -, that in other Bufinefs, which he apprehended related to the Publick, he gave the Bills to Mr. Paxton, who allowed them to the Examinant upon Account, as Money ; that the Examinant had one Bill of near 3000/. for Profecutions relating to the Borough of Orford in Suffolk, in which Mr. John La-ixjlon, of the Ex- chequer, appeared to be the Client; that Mr. Lazvton paid the Ex- aminant feveral hundred Pounds for carrying on this Profecution, and fometimes he had Money for the fame Purpofe from Mr. Paxton, for which the Ex.'minant gave him a Receipt; but this was, for the mofl: Parr, wl en Mr. Lawton was out of the Way, and when they met again, Mr. Paxtcn ufua'ly gave up fuch Receipts to the Examinant, who then gave Mr. Lawton others in Lieu thereof; that twice Mr. Majlerman received Cofts from Mr. Moxon, who was concerned on the other Side, about 200/. the firll, and about 500/. the fecond Time, and thefe Cofts being allowed to the Examinant by Mr, Mafterman, who taxed th; Bills, the Examinant gave Mr, Laivton a Receipt to their Amount, and, the Examinant believes, that he gave no Receipt to any Perfon, excfp: as atorefaid, for money advanced in this Affair, but to Mr. Lawton, from whom molt of the money came ; that at firll the Examinan' did not know whether this Profecution was a public or pri- vate one, but he did at laft believe it was anfwered by Public money; that it was underllood by all Mr. Lawton\ Friends, as the Examinant believes, that the faid Profecutions were carried on with Public money, and that Mr. Lawton di(i not bear the Expence thereof ; that the Ex- aminant, bring at Bury, was one Evening in Company with Mr. Prime and Mr. Lawton, when Mr. Prime took occafion to talk to Mr. Laiv- ton, as not thinking he had received enough in that Caufe, Mr. Lawton told Mr. Prime that Mr. Banks had Orders to fee him handfomely, and asked Banks, what he had given him, wh'b anfwered. Five Guineas on each Information ; and the Examuant intormed the Committee, that there were feveral Informations; he further added, that Mr. Prime faid to Mr. Lawton, I do not doubt, but this is an Exchequer, or Trea- fury Profecution (one or other Fxprtffion the Examinant was fure of") Mr. Lawton tfien faid c Mr. Prime, Why cio you ask me that Que- llion ? Mr. Prime replied, I fee there is Abundance of Care taken in thefe Profecutions, and a thing carried on by a private Purfe would fcarce have had two Sollicitors.; that thereupon angry Words palTed between Mr. Lawton (4) 'Lawtcn and Mr. Prime, and that at lad Mr. Laivtcn h\d to hxm, "I afllire you, there has been no money dilburfcd hitherto, but what h;is been out ot my Pocket, but I do not pretend to fiy, I fliill not be reimburf- ed it again;" that the Examinant has fometim'es jocularly afked Mr. Paxton, it rhefe Profccutions were not on the Public Account, but that Mr. Pi~.xton has been on the Referve, and evaded it by telling the Examr- nant, ''-What is that to you, as long as you are paid ?" that there remains Seven hundred and odd Pounds unpaid of the Bill for thefe Profccu- tions i that Mr. Paxton has likewife charged himfelf with another Bill of the Examinant's as money in an Accompt to pafs between thtm I in a Profecution againft a News Writer for defaming Sir Cbarhs Gunler Nichol, juft after his Death, for having accepted of a Red Ribbon •, that CounfcJlor Chute recomniended Mr. Paxton to Lady Nkbol, and Mr. Paxton gave Orders to the Examinant tor this Profecution ; and that a good while afterwards, the Examinant afked Mr. Chute, \A\o he fliould make out the Bill to-, that Mr. Chute told the Eximinant, that he fhould be no Lofer by it, but that he thought it was to coft Lady Nichol no- thing -, and that he apprehended Mr. Paxton was to pay it -, on which the Examinant went to Mr. Paxton, who at firft made a little demur about it, but after a while he did agree to allow the Bill to pafs in Ac- count, as aforefaid ; but the Examinant never did apprehend it to be at Mr. Paxton's, own Expence ; nor doth the Examinant know, that Mr. Paxton ever charged himfclt with the Examinant's Bills as Money, be- fore he had actu-dly received them, unlefs in what the Ex.uninant ap- prehends was iiilcharged with Publick Money ; but that Mr. Paxton has engaged himfelf under his Hand, to anfwer fir the bcfbre-menticned Bills as Money in his Account with the Examinant. Mr. Leonard /Martin, who has been Partntr widi his Father in-I aw Mr. Paxtoii fince Aiuhaelmas 1737, being examined, faid, that he was concerned tor the Borough of Radnor, but not till they came to apply for a new Charter-, that he received his Dirciftions trom Thomas L/^wis Efquire, who told the Examinant, as he believes, that he fhould bt paid by the Government ; that he conlulted Mr. Paxton, as well as Mr. Lew- is, and, to the beft of his Remembrance, Mr. Leiiis told him, Mr. Paxton was to pay him ; that the Examinant's Bill tor folliciting, and pafling the new Charter, and for defending three Informations in the Nature of ^w l^arranto, againft three Members of the Corporation, was 12S4/. ot which upwards ot iiool. was on Account of pafTmg the Charter, and it was paid him by Mr. Paxton above a Year ago ; th.At this new Charter was for an Incorporation, the old Corporation being broke up by Profccutions and Judgments of Outlier; that he apprehends the Petitioners for this Charter were only Perlons fet up by Mr, Lewis , for he was the Perfon that had it at heart, and who chiefly follicited, and puflied it forwards. Thomas Lewis Efquire, a Member of this Houfe, being examined, faid, that he applied to have the Expenoes of an intended new Charter for the Borough of Radnor born by the Crown ; that he had a favourable Anfwer; and believes Mr. Paxton has told him, he had Dircdions to take care of it; that Mr. Martin adt l: as Sollicitor in procuring and patTing the Charter, and furnifhed the Money tor that purpofe ; but the Examinant believes, Mr. Paxton pud Mr. Martin again; that the Exa- minant paid fome Fees to the Couriftl for attending tht Attorney andiSc/- liciLor General in this Afiair, which amounted to about 40 er 50/. that he fi ( 5 ) lie delivered a Bill for the fame to Mr. PjxIcu, who repaid him -, that Mr. Paxtoji in the fame manner fupportcd the Expence of defending three Informations which were brought during the paffing of the Char- ter, againft the BaiHff and two Aldermen of Radnor; on which Infor- mations they were oufted from their Offices as Biyliff and Aldermen. Your Committee proceeded, in the next Place, to examine into Mr. Paxton's Behaviour as a publick Accomptant; and find, that he entered on his Office of Sollicilor of the Treafury on the 22d of December 1730, from which time till the Month of July 1734, being four Years and upwards, they find that he had paiTed no Account, nor was he in Readinels to pafs the fame ; for it appears to your Committee, that, on the 2d of July 1734, he procured a Warrant from the Treafury for flopping Procefs till the Hillary Term following ; but it does not appear to your Committee, that, fince that Time, Procefs has ever been revived againft him, or that any other Steps were taken towards his paffing any Ac- count, till about twelve Months ago, when his Account, ending the 2 2d of December 1732, was delivered into the Auditor'^ Office. That, befides the Account juft mentioned, there is another of Mr. Paxtoit's, ending the 22d of December 1734, now under Examination, a which was delivered in to the faid Office lall April was twelve Months ^ there lies alfo before the Auditor a third Account, ending the 2 2d of December 1736, which was delivered in the 8th Day of February laft. And your Committee find, that, on the 8th of February lafl, a State of the Account of Mr. Paxton, from the 22d of December 1730 (the Day of his Appointment to his Office) to the 22d of December 1732, amounting to the Sum of 28,235/. 00 ^d. i and the Difcharge whereof amounted to 26,630/. 4J. c,d. was fubmitted to the Lords of the Treafuryh^f Mr. Edward Bangham, Deputy-Auditor, who has obferved at the Foot of the Account, that for 3251 /. 17 j.Part of the Cravings of the faid Mr. Paxton, no Receipts, or Bills of the Particulars, were produced ; and that it appears by the Warrant of the Treafury, which diredl the Accomptant's Allowance of 500 1, per Annum, payable out of the Exchequer, that the faid Allowance is to be, as well in lieu of Termly, and other Fees and Allowances, which he might claim for his own Pains and Service, as for Clerks, Coach-hire, and fuch other the like Charges, incident to the Exe- cution of the faid Office ; but that it is alledged by the Accomptant, that the Services beforementioned are foreign to his Bufinefs as Sollicitor of the Treafury, and that he was direded, by fpecial Orders, to attend the fame; the greateft Part of Vv'hich were betore his Appointment, and required his Attendance in the Country ; and it appears, that this State of the faid Account, though it bears Date on the 8th of February, was not in Fad deliverc'd into the Treafury till the 9th of February laft, when your Committee, to their great Surprize, find, that, notwith- ilanding thefe Obfervations laid betore the Commiffioners of the Tr^^- fury by the Deputy Auditor of the Impreft, they did, the very fimc Morning, ifiue their Warrant to one of the Auditors of the Impreff, to authorize the paffing and allowing of the faid Account. But though, by this Means, tlie Treafury did grant to Mr. Paxtcr. all the Favour in their Power, his Accounts are not yet pafTed ; for they mull be firft declared, and the Declaration is the judicial Aft of the Chancellor of the Exchequer; in which he can revife, and, if he fees Guife, difailow them, or any part of them, notwithftanding the Warrant of the Treafury, and the Allowance of the Auditor, founded thereon. C Your ( 6) Your Committee finding, that Mr. Paxlon had aflually paflTed no Ac- count, during the whole Time of his being SoUicitor to the Treafury, proceeded to enquite, whether any large Sums of publick Money had been intrufted to him, and find, that he Itands Infuper 5,382/. i8j. id. for Money paid over to him by Mr. Cratcherode, when the faid Mr. Paxton was his AHillanc; they alfo find, that he ftands charged upon the Im- preft Rolls with a Sum of 89,31 + /. 19^. ^d. 1. upon Account; fo that the whole Sum of publick Money, with which he ftands charged, is no Icfs than 94,697/. 17^. 3^. t- It alfo appears to your Committee, that, befides the fiid Sums, they have already difcovered, that Mr. Thomas Ixwthcr., one of the Melfen- gers of the Treafury, l;as paid to the faid Mr. Paxton one Sum of 1500/. by Virtue oi a Minute of the Treafury; for which Sum neither the {x'A Lo'-JJther, nor the faid Paxton, are publick Accomptants. But your Committee are utterly unable to difcover, by what Arts and Methods Mr. Paxton could evade paffing any Account duiing the Time of his being SoUicitor to the Treafury, which is upwards of eleven Years; efpecially as it appears to your Committee, that it was the Duty of the faid Treafury to oblige him to profecute all fuch Accomptants, as Jhould appear to be in Arrear by the Certificates of the Auditors ot the Imprells; for your Committee find, from a Report of the faid Auditors, (which is hereunto annexed hy w.\y oi Jppe/:dix J that, by a Warrant of the Treafury, dated the 1 6 of Aiiguft 1 7 1 1 , and fiii,ned Oxford, the SoUicitor of the Treafury is direfled to take Care, that the Procefs be regularly ifllied ag.iinit fuch impreft Accomptants as fhall appear to be in Arrear, by the Certificates of the Auditors ot the Imprelb, to the Queen's Remembrancer ; as alfo againft all Perfons Handing Infuper upon any Impreft, or other Accounts ; which Warrant was confirmed in his hie Majefty's Reign, as follows, viz. IVbitehaU, Treafury- Chambers iS November, 1717. Prefcnt Lord Stanhope, L.ord Torrington, John WaUop, Mr. Eadlie. " Renew the Order to the SoUicitor of the Treafury to profecute Supers <.' upon Accountants, " And your Committee are at a L.ofs to determine, what Motives could induce the Commiftioners of the Treafury, to continue the faid M.r. Paxton fo many Years in the Office of SoUicitor of the Treafury, a.nd to dired, that fuch large Sums of publick Money fhould, from time to time, be lodged in his Hands; when they muft have been infoimed, by the Half-yearly Certificates, delivered in to them by the Auditors of the Imprefts, that he had paft no Accounts from the Time of his firft Appointment to be SoUicitor of the Treafury, which was on the 22d of December 1730. Your Committee, the better to be enabled to difcover, by what Ser- vices the faid Mr. Paxton could deferve fuch fingular and extraordinary Indulgenc,', did, on Friday laft, direcfl the Keeper of Nezi'jate to brir.g him ciore them; and, upon his being called in, the former Queftioa was gain repeated to him, viz. " Did you advance any Money to Mr. John Jones, on the Account of Mv. Boleler, about the Time of the Election at f-Fendovcr in lyss^" Upon ■ (7) Upon which he defired, that his former Anfwer to the Citd Queflion might be read. Which being read accordingly ; He repeated the very fame Words, viz. " I will not anfwer that «' QuelVion, as it may tend to accufe myfclf." Whereupon he was asked. Whether the Apprehenfion, that it might tend to accufe himfelf, was his only Reafon for not anfwering ? He fiid, " That is my principal Reafon." Whereupon he was ordered to withdraw. Gwyn Vatighan Efquire, being examined, he was asked, If he knew of any Sum, or Sums, of Money, paid out of the Salary, or Profits, of any Place, or Office, under the Government ? To which he an- fwered, " I do not know of any, at this time." Being then further asked. If he knew of any paid within thefc ten Years ? He defired to know. Whether he was to include himfelf, or only others ? He was then informed, that the Queflion was general, and included all Perfons. Then he faid, that he was apprehenfive, an Anfwer to that Que- ftion might in part affccfl himfelf i and therefore defired to be excufcd anfwering. Whereupon he was ordered to withdraw, .^^^ -., And upon his being called in again ; He was acquainted by the Chairman, that the Committee had con- fidered of his Objeftion to the Quellion put to him, and would not prefs it further at that time. Your Committee are now proceeding, with all poffible Difpatch, in profecuting the Enquiry into the Conduift of the Earl of Orford, du- ring the laft ten Years of his being firft Commiffioner of the Treafurj, and Chancellor and Under-Treafurer of His Majetly's Excbeiiuer ; but they cannot conclude this Report, without reprefcnting, to the Houfe, the great Difficulty they labour under, from this obiUnate and con- temptuous Behaviour ot Mr. Paxtoii, who appears to have been dircdt- . ]y or indirectly concerned in moft of the Tranfaclions, into which they have hitherto enquired-, and whei^ they confider the very large Sums, which have been ilfued to him, during the Time of his being Sollicitor to the Ti-eafitry, and that no efleflual Methods were ever taken to oblige him to account for any Part thereof, (a Circumllance, which could not arife from mere Negligence or Inattention) when they confider that the (Irong and well-grounded Remarks made on his Accounts by the De- puty Auditor of the Impreils, were inlbntly followed by a Warrant of the-TreAfury, directing the Auditor to allow his Accounts ; when they confider, what ftrong Sufpicions muil: arife from the foregoing Evi- dence, that fome Part, at leall, of the Money in his Hands, may have been employed in Pradlices dangerous to the Liberties of this Nation, and defl:ru6live of the Independency of Parliaments •, they cannot help ob- fcrving, that this Perfeverance in refufing to anfwer, feems to take its Rife from a premeditated Sclieme, to obflruCt and fruftrate their En- quiry, and, (hould it pafs unregarded, may probably communicate ic felf ( s ) felf to otiier Perfons, whom they fhall have occafion to cail before ■diem •, and, by that means, render it impolTibie to lay a clear State of Affairs before tlie Houfe. Your Committee therefore thought themfelves obliged in Duty to Report thefe Matters fpecially to the Houfe, and do humbly fubmit the ame to their Confideratioa. THE APPENDIX. GentlemeHy MY Lord Treafurer is pleafed to Order, that you, together with Mr, Borret tlxe Sollicitor for the Affairs of the Treafury, do at- tend Mr. Attorney, and Sollidtor General, and advife with them of the mod effe<5tual Methods for making out the Procefs of the Exchequer from Time to Time, againft Accomptants in Default, and for Execu- tion of the fame. I am, Treafury Chambers, Gentkinen, 4 June, 1 71 1. lour moji humble Servant^ William Lowndes. f To the Right honourable Robert Earl of Ox- j^uditors Imprejl \ ford and Earl Mortimer, Lord High Trea- l fiirer 0/ Great Britain. IN Obedience to your Lordfliips Order of the 4'" o^ June, vre have attended Mr. Attorney, and Sollicitor General, and advifed with them of the moft effectual Method tor making out the Procefs of the Exche- quer, againft Accomptants in Default, and for the due Execution of the fame •, and by whofe Approbation do humbly propofe. That the Sollicitor of the Treafury be dire<^ed to take Care that the Procefs be regularly iffued, againft fuch Impreft Accomptants, as lliall appear to be in Arrear, by the Certificates of the Auditors of the Im- prefts, to the Queen's Remembrancer; as alfo ag.iinft all Perfons ftand- ing Infuper, upon any Impreft, or other Accounts. That the like Diredions be given with Refpeft to the Receivers of the Land-Tax, who are behind with their Accounts ; as alfo to the SoUicitors of the Cuftoms, Excife, PoftOffice, Salt and Stamp Duties, with Refpeft to the Perfons ftanding infuper upon the Accounts ot the Revenues ; and that the Effect of fuch Procefs may appear, It is hum- bly propofed, that the fame may be reprefented, by each Sollicitor, in the Beginning of every Term to your Lordfhip, in the following Method, (9 ) Method } and that a Copy thereof, be each Term tranfmitted to the Auditors of the Imprefls, and the Auditor of the Land Revenue. And whereas many of the Accompraots have no vifible Eftate in Land, and it has been found by long Experience, that the iffuing Di- Jiringas ad Computandum, have had very Httle Efted ; It is therefore propofed. That in all Cafes, where a Diftringos has once been ilfued without Effeft, the feveral Sollicitors fhould be directed to take out a Capias ad Computandum the next Term, to fecure the Perfon of the Ac- comptant, till he gives Security for his rendering a due Account. E. Harky, A. Mainwairing^ I approve of the method propofed Edward Northey, July 20"", 171 1, I likewife approve of this method, Robert Raymond, July 30'\ 1711. Accomptants ap- pearing to be in Arrear by the Certificates of the Auditors of the Impreft. Perfons Handing infuper upon the Accounts of the Army, (jfc. for which no Ac- count has been xendred. Procefs ifllied a- gainit, and exer cuted upon fuch Accomptants. Procefs ifllied a- gainft, and exe- cuted upon fuch Accomptants. Reafon why Pro- cefs has HOC been executed. Reafon why Pro- cefs is not exe- cuted. Accounts brought into the Auditors fince the ifluing of Procefs. Infuper Accounts brought in fince the laft Certifi. cate. After ( lo ) After my hearty Commendations, having confidered the Reprefenta- tion, of which the within written is a true Copy, and approving there- of; thefe are to authorize and dircLT: ycu to t:^k.e Care, that all Mat- ters and Things therein and thereby prcicribed, for the Sollicitor of tJie Treafury to do, be carefully and duly done and performed by you; and that your Proceedings thereupon be, from Time to Time, repre- ftnted in the Manner, and according to the Method thereby propofcd, and, for fo doing, this fhall be your Warrant, Whitehall Treafury Chambers i6t)\ Augujl lyii. Oxford. To my very loving Friend William Borret Efquire, Sollicitor for the jiff airs of the Treafury. Which Warrant was confirmed in his late Majefly's Reign, as follows, viz. , Whitehall^ Treafury Chambers, 1 8 November 1717. Prefent Lord Stanhope Lord Torrington John Wallop Mr. Baillie. Supers upon Accomptants, 7 Renew the Order to the Sollicitor of the about Frofecutions. 3 Treafury, to profecute Supers upon Ac- comptants. It is fubmitted, whether the Certificates from the Sollicitors, fhould not be every ifluable Term, inftead of every Term. The foregoing, are true Copies from the Entries in the Books in the Office of the Auditors of the Imprefts t • Edw.lBan^hafn 7 y,, , a a-. cy M * S- Deputy Auditors. J a. ^immas 3 ^ •^ FINIS', A FURTHER R E P O R T FROM THE COMMITTEE ^ O F S E C R E S T, A FURTHER REPORT FROM THE COMxMITTEE O F S E C R E S T, Appointed to enquire into the CONDUCT of ROBERT Ezvl of OrFORD, During the lad Ten Years of his being Firft Commiflioner of die 1 reafury, and Chan- cellor and Under-Treafurer of His MA- JESTY'S Exchequer. irtth the A P P E N D I X. L O N D O ]>i : Printed in the Year MDCCXLII. .'// ( I ) A FURTHER E P O R T FROM THE Committee of Secrecy. -TT T-O U R Committee having in their former Report laid before the Houfe ^Ll the Obftrudions they met with in the Courfc of their Enquiry, and find- W ing that the Lords had refufed to concur in the Means propofed by this Houfe to remove them, by rejedling the Bill for indemnifying fuch Pcr- fons as {hall upon Examination make Difcoveries touching the Difpoiltion of pub- lick Money, or concerning the Difpofition of Offices, or any Payments or Agree- ments in Refpcft thereof, or concerning other Matters relating to the Conduil of Robert Earl of Orford, have not thought it advifeable to enter upon any new- Matter relating to the Tranfadions of the Earl of Orford. But as previous to the rejeding of the faid Bill by the other Houfe, they had feveral Matters before them of the higheft Confequence and Importance to the Succefs of the War with Spain, and to the domeflic Oeconomy and good Order of the Kingdom, to the Payment of the Troops abroad, to the Freedom of EleiElions at Home, and to the Quantity and Method of iiRjing publick Money for the fecret Services of the State, in all which the faid Earl appears to have had the principal, if not thflk fole Direftion. Your Committee thought it their abfolute Duty to lay thefe Mat- ters before the Houfe, and were preparing to do it with as much Clearnefs and Perfpicuity, as the many notorious Difficulties and Difcouragements this Enquiry has laboured under would permit. But in the Execution of this Dcfign, they were again interrupted by a new and unforefeen Obftru£tion to one of the moil material Points in QueiHon, which therefore, together with the other Matters abovcmen- tioncd, they find themfelves under a Neceffity of laying before the Houfe. As the vigorous and fuccefsful Profecution of the War in America feems to have been the great Objedl of the Interelh and Inclination of the People of Great- Britain ; and as an Expedition to a Climate fo dilfant and dangerous, muft unavoidably be attended with an immenfe Expence both of Men and Money to the Nation, Your Committee therefore, confidering how efTentially it muft afFeft the Glory of His Majefty's Arms, and the Juftice due to this Nation, that thofe of their Countrymen, who chearfullv undertook a Service, where the Enemy was the leaft Danger they were expofcd to, fliould be juftly and fully paid the great Sums raifed to fiipport them, have thought it their Duty to enquire into the Ccntrafl: made for fupplying His Majefty's P"orces going upon the Expedition with Lord Lathcart, and to examine whether it had been eftablifhed on the mofl: juft and advantageous Foot, for Troops fo peculiarly deferving the Care and Atten- tion of the Publick. And in proceeding therein, Your Committee find. That the Money, or rather the Currency oi^anwica, is of a lefs Value than Sterling Money : and by the Examination of Merchants it ap- pears, that for fome Years before the Commencement of the War with Spain, the Rate of Exchange between 'Jamaica and England ■was from 135 to 140, but gcno- rally at 140, very ftw Bills having been drawn under that Rate ; that is, Perfons ^t Jamaica generally paid 140/. of the Currency of that Country, for a Bill which intitled them, or their Agents, to 100 /. Sterling in England. Your Committee find, that on the gth of July 1740, the following Propofal was made to the Treafury for furnifhing Money at 'Jamaica for the Expedition un- der Lord Cathcart, by Peter Burrell and John Brijlow, Efqrs. Members of this Houfe. ( 2 ) To the Right Honourable, the Lords Commijftoners of His Majejly's Treafury^ The Propofal c/ Peter BurrcU and John Briftow. " That they are ready to furnifh at "faynaica His Majefty's Forces going upon " the intended Expedition with Lord tV-v/jcY/// with any Sums of Money, and at " the Times which the Service fhall require, at. the Rate ot'ipoA Sterling for " every i2o/. paid at Jamaica in tlic Currency of that Ifland ; that the Sum of " 27,000/. be paid to them before the Departure of the Troops, they furniihing " their Bills at Sight on Jamr.ica for the Amount thereof, at the abovementioned «' Rate of 100/. S/er/w^for 120/. Jamaica (Znriencv. That the fubfequent Pay- *' ments be made upon their producing the Deputy- Paymafter's Bills or Receipts, " who Ihall be dired:ed to give the f.une, for the Sums they fhall receive from " Time to Time. <■<■ P E T E R B U R R E L L, *<■ J O H N B' R I S T O JV. " London, July gth, 17+0." This Propofal was the fame Day agreed to by the Commiffioners of tlie Trea- fury, the Earl of Or/srrt' being then prefentat the Board, which appears the more extraordinary to your Committee, becaufe the Commiffioners of the Treafurv (had they thought fit to enquire) muft have found, that for fevcral Months pre- ccdin<^ the Date of this Propofal, all the Bills drawn from Jamaica for the Service • of his Majefty's Navy and Ordnance, were drawn at the Rate of 140/. for lool. Sterling, as appears bv the Appendix (No. i.) Your Committee alfo obfcr\c, that at the Time of the Delivery of thi; Propo- fal, it could be no Secret to Mr. BurrcU 2ud Mr. Brijiow that the Exchange from Jamaica was 140/. for your Committee find in the Minutes of a Court of Direc- tors of the South Sea Company, when Mr. Burrell Sub-Governor, and Mr. Bri- Jiow Deputy- Governor, were prefent, the following Order. " Friday, ibth oi March, 1738-9. "Ordered, " That it be referred to the Committee of Correfpondence, to confid«r and " report their Opinion concerning the Exchange from Jamaica, which is now " at 140/. for 100/. Sterling, and yet the Company are not credited for the Dol- " lars, Piftoles, and Bar-Gold, more than when the Exchange was at 135/. " per Cent" The Circumftances which preceded and occafioned this extraordinary Tranfac- tion, as far as your Committee have been able to trace them, are of a very fin- gular Nature; for it appears by the Examination of Captain Alexander JFilfon, vho was Agent to Lord Cathcart, when he was preparing for the Expedition to the Wejl-lndies, (which is annexed to the Appendix, No. 2.) That in \\\c May or June preceding this Contract, the Pay-Mafter-General communicated to Lcrd Cathcart a Method of paying the Troops which his Lordlhip ap- proved of; this was by fending a Sum of Money by the Dcputy-Pay-Mailer who was to attend the Expedition, and impowering him to draw what Bills fhould be neccffary, and directing the Troops to be paid at Jamaica at fuch a Rate of Exchange asihould appear to Lord Cathcart and the fuperior Officers to be moft advantageous to the Troops. And it beina; intimated fome time after to Lord Cath- cart that a Contract for paying the Troops at 120/. Jamaica Money for ico l.Jier. was then depending before the Treafurv, he immediately procured a Meeting with Mr. Hanhury (Filfiams, Pdy-Maller of the Marines, Mr'. Burrell, and Mr. Brijlnu, with a View, if poffible, to get the Troops paid in a more advantageous manner, for he did not apprehend the Contract was at that time palTcd. At this Meeting he mentioned the Inconveniencies which might arife from the paying Men at a Race fo much lower than the known Exchange, and the Danger there was from what he had obferved abroad, of its producing Difcontcnt and Alutiny. And after feveral Arguments ufed on both Sides, their Meeting ended on Mr. Burrell or Mr. Briftcw's dDclarin'J that they had made an Agreement with theTreafury already on the 'I'crms o; 20 /. ^a.v:rica Mo:i2y for lOo/. /Icr. and that they could not do it for lefs Profit, i'ro. -. ninaaons of Mr. Burrell and iMr. Brijhw (which are annexed in ihc .'■. :■. ' '1 i: ap-JCiirs that thev applied for this Contract to the Earl of ( 3 ) of OrfcrJ, and to no other Perfon ; for when it was publickly known that the Troops were going to Jamaica, Mr. Burrell acquainted the faid Earl that he had Corref- pondents in Jamaica, on the South-Sea Company's Account, who were Men of great Credit, and had the greateft command of Money of any in the Place; and he thought if Money was wanting there, he could fupply the Government as well as any body, and that afterwards confidering the great Importance of the Affair, he thought it too much hazard for himfelf alone, and mentioned it to Mr Brijiow, and they together fettled the Terms of their Propofal ; and about the Month of June 1740, the Parliament being then prorogued, they waited on the Earl oiOrford, and propofed to him the fanieTerms, which were afterwards agreed to by the Trea-' fury. The faid Earl afked them if thefe were the loweft Terms, and hoped they would not afk more than was reafonable, or what any body elfe fhould complain of, that he would not take it on himfelf, but defired them to make their Propofals to tlie Treafury, which feems to your Committee to have been intirely|Matterof Form. For it appears that when this Propofal was accordingly delivered to the Treafury, the Gentlemen cannot recolleft to whom it was delivered, nor when nor by whom they were informed of its being accepted ; nay, one of the Gentlemen even does not remember whether they themfelves went with their Propofal when it was pre- fented. And your Committee having alfo examined Charles Hanbury IVilliams Efq; a Member of this Houfe, touching the Converfation that pafled between Mr. Burrell, Mr. Bri/lmv, znd Lord Catbcart, at Mr. JyHliams's Office, have alfo added his Exa- nfination to the others in the Appendix, (No. 3.) to which they beg leave to refer. Your Committee cannot find that any Notice or Intimation was given to any Perfon except what pafled between the Earl of Orford and the Contraftors as is be- fore mentioned, of the Intention of the Treafury to make this Contra£l ; for it ap- pears by the Examination of James Knight Efq; (which is annexed in the Appen- dix, No. 4.) that when he heard the Troops were going to Jamaica, and was to!d the Treafury would contra£t- with private Perfons for paying them, he did himfelf intend to make an offer of furnifhing the Money ; but in a very few Days after, he heard the Treafury had agreed with R'lr. Burrell and Mr. Bri/low, at the rate of 120 /. and he did not believe the Trealur^ ever gave any Notice of their Intentions to make any fuch Contraft. That what he expefled was not a formal publick No- tice, but that it fhould have been communicated to Merchants, as he has heard has been pracftifed in Queen Amte's Wars : And had this been done, he believes feveral befides himfelf would have propofed, and that he himfelf would have furnifhed the Money at 1^0 I. per Cent for 100 /. Sterling, and fhould have thought it a good Bargain, provided he could have had the fame Money advanced to him which he has heard was advanced to Mr. Burrell and Mr. Brijiow. That after the firfl dif- ficulty, which would be on the Arrival of the Troops, was over, he did not doubt but he could have contracted with the People of the Ifland to furnifli the Money at the rate of 137^. and if the whole Money was advanced to him here before-hand, and he was only to fend it over and furnifh it at Jamaica at the Rate of 1^0 per Cent, he thinks hefhouldmake 12 or 15 />fr Cent /nr ^«n«m of the Sums he fur- nifhed by returning the fame Money twice a Year. This led your Committee into a computation of the Profits which might have been made in this ContraiS, which they conceive to fland thus : If the value of 100 1. Jier. be fent to Jamaica in Moidores, it appears they will produce 143 l.ios. Jamaica currency ; but by this Contrail only 120 /. Jamaica cur- rency was to be paid at Jamaica for every 100 l.Jhr. received here. To this 120 /. Jamaica currency, all the necefTary Charges muft be added, which your Committee conceive to be i per Cent CommifTion, 2 h-per Centlnfurance, i per Cent Freight, and %. per Cent tor the Charges of Shipping, in all 4/. 15 s. per Cent, which on 120/. Jamaica currency is 5/. li^s. of the fame currency, in all 125 /. 141. Ja- maica currency. So that the Profit to be made on fending Moidores was the differ- ence between 125/. 14 j. and 143/. 105. which is 17/. 16 j-. Jamaica currency, or 111, Zs. id. Jier. out of every 100 I. Jler. which is 14/. 3^-. 2d. j;. per Cent ller. And your Committee obfcrve, that if half of the Sum fent had been in Six and Thirty-fhilling Pieces, and only half in Moidores, 100/. Jler. lb fent would have produced \i^\ I. Jamaica currency, which is only 2 /. \0s. Jamaica currency Ms than Moidores alone would have produced. And your Committee cannot help obferving that if the Treafury had thought fit to fend in Moidores to Jamaica, on the account of the Public, the fame Sums of Money Money-wliich they ai^ual'.y advanced to the Contra^^orf;, then ertry lOO I. Jfer. fo fcnt would have produced 143/. and an half, Jamsi.ri currency, except what may be allowed for Infurance, which your Committee is informed amounts to about 2/. and 3.n\\Ai per Cent on Money fent by Ships of War. Nor could fre- quent Opportunities have been wanting of fending on Board his IMajeftv's Ships fuch farther Supplies of Money as might at any time have been neceilary for that Service. But if it had heen thought more advifeable to have fupplicd part of this Expence by Draughts from thence, there can be no doubt but that the Deputy Pay-Mufler being furnifh'd with a proper Proportion of Specie from hence would have been able to keep up the Exchange at 140/. and in tliat Cife no Charge would have attended that Part fo fupplied. It further appears that in the Courfe of this Affair, and before tlie departure of Lord Cathcart, iHU greater Indulgences were granted to the Contra»itors ; for by their firft: Propofal the Sum of 27000 /. only was to be advanced tlieni by the Trea- •furv before the departure of the Troops, but the fubfequent Pavments were not to be made to tiiem till they produced the Deputy Pay-Maftcr's Bills or Receipts : And yet on tlie 30th of September following, which w.is before the departure of the Troops, iicool. was furtlier advanced to them by the Pay-Mafter General, for their Bill of that date ; and on the ift of October 9500/. more was advanced to them by tlie Pay- Matter of the Marine:, for their Bill of the 30th oi' September ; and on the 23d of December a Sum of i2coo/. was advanced by the Pay-Maflef General, for their Bill of that Day's date ; and on the 6th of January, a farther Sum of 9000 /. was advanced by the Pay-Mafter of the Marines for their Bill of the 31ft of December, All in Conl'equence of Alinutcs of the Trcafur}', as in the Ap- pendix, No. 5. Here youv Committee cannot he'p obferving that the paying thefe Sums amount- ing to 42,50c /. over and above the 27,000/. originally advanced before there had been any Difburfemejus on the Part of the Contractors, altered the mture of the Contract, and rendered it much more beneficial than as it was originally pro<- pofed by the Contractors themfelvcs. Mr. Burre'J f.iid, he did offer half of his Share to his Brother, and a Gentleman engaged in Bufinefs with him, but tliey thought it too great aRifque for them to run : He likewife mentioned it to another Gentleman (whom he did not namej who would not accept of it, that thefe Refufals were very early before anv thing was done in it, more than palling the ContraiSt, and that he mentioned them, to fhcw that he thought he had no great Bargain of it. And from the Examination of Mr. Burrell, and Mr. Br't/hw, it farther appears, that fome time after the making of the Contract, they offered Mr. Monfon, a Member of this Houfe, one fourth Part of it, as far as it related to the Pa)'ment of the Troops in the Office where he is Deputy, which he accepted of, and has fhared accordingly the Profits of this Con- tract. from the beginning ; and fome time after the Earl of Orford mentioned to M , Burre'd, that Mr. Hanbwy JV'd'aams h.id defircd him to fpeaic to him, Mr. Burrell, that one of Mr. JfilUami'i Friends might have a Share in the Remittances, but he added. You are to do juft as you pleafe, I don't alk you to let any body in, for the Contra£t is yours ; and foon afterwards, Mr. Hanbury IVtU'iami fpoke to the Con- tractors, and told them, that he had a Relation, one Mr. Hanbury, a JVeJl- India IVIerchant, to whom he had Obligations ; and as he had Money anJ Effedts at 'Ja- maica, he defircd he might be concerned one fourth Part with them for the future, which he has accordingly been, in what relates to the payment of the Marines in Mr. Hanbury IFilliams's Office. And it appears to your Committee, that neither the one nor the other of thofe Gentlemen advanced any Money, or were concerned in the Management, but were to be Sharers of the Profit or Lofsonly. And it further appears to your Committee, that on the Arrival of the Troops at Jamaica, and the tendering the Money to them at 120 /. Jamaica Currency, great Dilcontents were exprelfed by the Officers, and fome aiStually rcfufed to re- ceive it, and with time the Difcoiitent increafed, and nothing was t.ilked of fo much amongft the Officers of the Army, as the Hardfliip of being paid at 120 /. when the exchange was at 140 /. every one of them became a Calculator, and complained that he loft 16 /. 6x. on every 100 /. he being paid his 120 /. Jamaica Money, with 62 Moidores, which is no more than 83/. 14 i. Sterling ; all which appears by the Letters of ColehrcAe and General IVenfworth, annexed in the Ap- pendix, (No. 6.J fo truly were tlie Fears of Lord Cathcart verifyed. And (5) And tliis Uneafinefs among the Troops was greatly increafed by the peremptory Refufal of the Agents of Mr. Burrell, and Mr. Bri/hw, to furnifh the Deputy Paymattcr zt Jamaica With any Money upon their Credit, arifing, as Mr. Cokbrooke Lvfs in his Letter of the 20ih of February, 1740, M.irk (B) in the Appendix, (No. 6) from their Views of appropriating the Profit Jo themfelves, and being dazled with the Profpeft of getting 15 or 20 per Cent, inftead of 2 per Cent their C'ommiffion. Upon this the Deputy Paymafter took up Money from other Perfons, and gave them Bills on the Paymafter General ; and tho' there were, as appears by the Extradfs of Letters of the Deputy Paymafter, of the 20th of February, and the 2 -^fi of March, 1740-1, which are mark'd (B and D) in the Appendix (No. 6.) Combinations to diftrefs him, yet the firft Bills he thus drew were at the rate of 130 /. and he by degrees raifed the Exchange, fo that at laft he drew at 140 /. whilft the Troops ftill continued to be paid at I20 /. And it farther appears to your Committee, that on the 5?^ of jfune, 1741, there is entred in the Treafury Books the following Minute : " Mr. Brijimu, oneof the Remitters for the /^i//-/«^;«, is called in, and ac- " quaintsmy Lords, that he and Mr. 5«rr^//havedifcharged fuch of their Fadlors " and Agents at Jamaica, as mifbehaved themfelves in their Conduct about fup- " P'y'"g "^'^s Money for the Publick Service there ; and that as General IVetitvdorth " has applied for the Troops to be paid at the rate of r25 per Cent, he will take " care that the Remittance (hall be made accordingly ". And on the lOth of July following, the Commiffionersof the Treafury agree and order, " That Meif. Burrcll znd Brijiow pay the Troops in /America at the " Rate of I 25 /. Jamaica Currency for I 00 /. Sterling, from the 24th of April pre- " ceding." Now yoiir Committee obferve on this aew Contraii, firft propofed on the 5th of June, 1741, and finally regulated on the loth of July following, that Mr. Cole- brooke, the Deputy-Paymafter at yiiOTj/fi?, did on the 24th of i^£'i;-«<7, )) preceding, being nineteen Weeks before the fettling of the faid Contract, draw Bills on the Paymafter- General to the Amount of 1250/. all at the Rate of 130/. and did in his Letter of the 23d of March beforemention'd, acquaint the Paymafter-General, that he had happily overcome all Oppofition, and could allure him, on good Grounds, that whatever Money might be necellary to be raifed for the Service would be found at Jamaica for Bills on the Paymafter-General, for 130/. and upwards ; and this laft Letter is dated above ten Weeks before the Propofal cf Ml. Burrell and Mr. Brijlow to amend their Contraft, and above fifteen Weeks before the final Acceptation of that Propofal by the Treafury : And it is worthy of Obfervation, that in the Months of January, February, March, April and M.iy, preceding the July iw •w\\\z\\ this fecond Con trad; at 125/. was eflabliflr'd by the Treafury, there were drawn from Jamaica no lefs than thirty- nine Bills for the Service of his Majefty's Navy, moft of them at the Rate of 135/. and the Re- mainder at the Rate of 140 /. And it appears to your Committee, that feveral Bills, amounting to the Sum of 1 1,392 /. 17 s. were drawn on the Paymafter of the Marines, by his Deputy, betwc.n i8th of ivir«ffr^, 1740, and i ft of y/«^/y?, 1741 ; Part of which Bills, a- mouTiiing to 5000/. were drawn in the Month of February preceding the new Contradt, that thefe Bills were paid by Mr. Burrell and Mr. Brijlow, and that Money was illued to them for that Purpofe by the Paymafter of the Marines. But your Committee have not been able to difcover at what Rate of Exchange they were drawn ; nor does it appear whether Mr. Burrell and Mr. Brijlow have been allowed to take the Profit arifing from the Difference between 120/. the Rate of. the Contract, and the Rate of Exchange the Bills were drawn at. And it farther appears to your Committee, that tjie Bills drawn by the Dcputy- Paymafter from Jamaica on the Paymafter-General, when the Agents of Mr. Burrell and Mr. Brijlow refufed to iupply him, amounting to the Sum of 29,216 /. 5i-. 3^. and which were drawn in the Months of ivii«/fl;7 and Afarc/j, 1740, and in April, May, June, July and AuguJi, 1741, at 130, 135, 137 i-half, and at Icaft at 140 /. were fent for Payment to Mr. Burrell and Mr. Brijlozu. And alfo that Money was ifTued from the Pav-Office to thein to difcharge the faid Bill j al- tho' it docs not appear to 'your Committee what Pretence of Right the ContraiSlors could have to the Profit arifing from any of thefe Bills, after the Forfeiture of their Bargain by the Refufal of their Agents to furnifti the Deputy- Pay mafters at J aynaica. B I But ( 6 ) But tho' thefe Bills were thus paid by Mr. Burrell and Mr. BiiJIozv, yet your Committee find, that on the 15th of December lall, the Pay mafter- General made a Rcprefentation of this Matter to the Treafury, as in the Appendix (No. 7.) pray- ing a Dircdlion of the Commiffioners, whether the Profit or Difference arifing by the Exchange on the faid Bills ftiould be accounted for and paid to the Agents of the faid Contraftors, or referred in the Hands of his Deputy for the Ufe and Be- nefit of the Publick. And your Committee find the following Minute in the Books of the Treafury. " TmtehallTreafury-ChaniberSy 2qth December, 1741. " Read alfo to my Lords a Memorial from the fame Paymafter, dated the 15th " Inftant, relating to the Remittance of Pay for the Troops in Jmerica with re- " fpeiSl to the Jamaica Currenc)', and order'd a Copy thereof to be fent to the " Remitters for their Anfwcr thereto." To which the Remitters gave in their Anfwer annexed in the Appendix (No. 8.) in which it is remarkable, that in ftating the feveral Charges upon fending over ^;pecie to Jamaica they make one Charg'i in the following Words, " Tliree per " Cent. Commiffioji we pay in Jamaica." Wheri.as it appears by their Examina- tions, that they paid One per Cent, only to their Agent, Mr. Cdehrookc, for the Money fent out with Lord Cnthcart. This Anfwer was received on th.e 5th of February laftj and nothing appears to have been done upon it while the Earl of Orford continued in the Treafurv. Your Comnjittee have been ob!i2,ed to dwell the longer upon this Contract be- caufe tlie wholeBijhavicur of the Earl of Orford, who had the fole Diredtion of it, feems fo extraordinary, that they fear this Part of their Report would want Credit if they had not defcenued into the moll minute Particulars ot it. ^ere they find a Contra£t enter'd into upon the good Faith of the Propofers, only with an Ignorance of the Value of the Exchange, whether real or afF.cted, does not appear to your Committee. And that Defe(?i: fo far from being endea- voured to be fupplied by admitting Propofals or information from any otlver Mer- chants, that it feem'd a dctennin'd Point to fhut it cut even when it feem'd to obtrude itfelf upon him from the very Oi5ces fubject to his Infpedion. But, as if this Injury to the Troops and Injuitice to the Nation had been too little, he render'd this Contract mure advantageous to the Contractors than tlieir moit (anguine Expedtation origiiiallv fuggefted to them. For tho', by the Terms of the ContracTr, the Publick was to advance 27,000 /. only in Money, yet we find the further Sum of 42,000/. advanced to them before the Arrival of the Troops in America. And your Committee obferve, that the Shares of the Profits of this Contract were deidt out to the Deputy of the Pay-Office, and to a Friend of the Pay- mafter of the Marines, at the Requeft of the faid Paymafter, without any Advance of Money or Trouble on their Part. And it is very remarkable, that thefe Shares were confined to the Sums iffued from the refpeftive Offices. And here your Committee muft obferve, from the whole Courfe of the Pro- ceedings, that neither the Intercft of the Soldier, or the Publick, feeni to have been the Objedl of the Earl oi Orford' s Attention. The Cries of the injured Soldiers, wiio had loft one Day's Pay in feven, where Provifions of all kinds bear an excciTue Price, made fo little Impreffion, th-t the only Relief they obtained, was an Advance of their Pay upon the Contradt, from 120/. to 125/. though there had been drawn upon the Navy-Office, during the fix Months preceding, feveral Bills, none at Jefs than 135/. and fome at 140/. And tho' the Deputy of the Paymafter-General likewife, 19 Weeks before, had drawn upon the Oiiice at 130/. and 15 Weeks before had written to the Pav-Mafter- General, that he might depend upon being furnifhed with whatever Sums Ihouid be wanted at 130/. and upwards, nor could there be any Reafon to fc.ir a Difap- pointmcnt in relying upon thofe Aflurances of the Deputy-Paymafter, becaufe to his Care wholly it was owing that they were not difappointcd upon the Refufal of the Contractors Agents to furnifh him. with Money. Your Committee cannot but obferve, tliat the Treafury in eftablifhing this new Contract, v/here the Contrafiors propofed the Advance from 120/. to 125/. to commence from the 5th ^i June 1741, order it with a Rctrofpedt, and to com- mence ( 7 ) mence from the 24th of Jpril preceding, arid are greatly at a Lofs to find if the firft Contraft was upon juft and equal Terms, why the ContratStors fubmitted to any Advance at all; and if it waf, not upon equal Terms, why the Treafury did not extend their RetrofpecSl, and order it to be reiSifyed from the Commence- ment. And fo little was the Publick to aw.il itfclf of this Injuftice to the Soldier, that when the Contradors could furnifh no Money at all, from their Agents refufing to anfwer Credit, and confcquentiy the Contrail was diffolved, and the Army muft have flarved, if the Deputy-Paymafter, who is the Officer of the Publick, had not procured Money by Draughts upon the Pay-Office, at 130/. 135/. up to 140/. 'Jamaica Currency, for 100/. Sterling \ yet thoie very Bills were fuffered to be paid by the Contractors, and publick Money ifiued to them to pay the f.ime, but by whofe Order does not appear to your Committee, as if the Pro- fits arifrng from the advanced Prices of thcife Bills, drawn by a publick Officer upon the Publick, had belonged to the Contraftors. And )our Committee obferve, that when on the 15th of December lafl the Pay- mailer praved Direftions from the Treafury, whether the Piofits on thofe I5il!s Ihould be paid to the Contraifors, or referved ior the Benefit of the Publick, even that could not be obtained while the Earl oi Orford remain'd in the Treafury. Your Committee now proceed to lay before you the great Part which the Earl of Or/irrf appears to have had in feveral Tranfaitions which nearly concern the Freedom of Eletfions, and the Independency of Parliament, and they ha\e 'the greateft Reafon to believe that had the Perfons employed in thefe dark Tranfa£i:ions been properly indemnifyed, many Difcoveries would have been made of the utmoft Importance. Your Committee having in their former Report laid befoYe you the Share which Mr. Paxton and Laivton had in carrying on the Profecutions relating to the Borough oi Orford, and particularly that Laivtonhiii declared, that he did not pretend to fay he fliould not be reimburfed his Expences on that Head, think fit now to acquaint you, that Mr. Abraharn Farley being examined, faid, that about "January 1736, Mr. Lawion told him there was an Order made out at theTreafury in his [Farley's) Name for 120c/. and bid him go and receive it, which he did, and paid it over immediately to the faid Latvian. And Mr. Richard Banks upon his Examination faid, that John Laxvton Efq; of the Exchequer, appeared to be his Client in the Profecutions relating to Orford, tho' he did not know v.'hat relation Mr. Lawton had to the Borough of Orford, but he believed that what Mr. Lawtcndid was to oblige Sir Robert IValpole., to whom he appichepMcd Latvian was under Obligations, that the whole Bill of near 3000 /. which the Piofecuuons amounted to, was never fatisiyed ; that Mr. Laivton., Paxton, ar.ii he [Banks,) met about it, and after a good deal of llrr^e allowed to ex- amine the Bill, they on the 15/A of December, 1736, came to a ftated Account, when there was a Ballancc of 1200 and odd Pounds in his (Banh's) Favour, whicli Mr. LaiL'tan agreed he would pay in a Fortnight's time, and he did foon after pay 500/. to Paxtov., who paid Banks 100 1. thereof, and promifed foon to par more. The remaining 7 00 and odd Pounds have notyct been paid, that he (Banks) d'ld about two Years ago file a Bill zgamil Paxton in Chancery, to bring him to an Account, that in this Bdl A of January laft, and did imagine thefe Profecutions were with a View of influencing the Eleftion, and to turn the Borough, and to get out the Mayor, and get the returning Officer. By all this it appears thnt the Management of this Affair was lodged in the hands of Paxtori's Partner and Son in Law, and the Expences attending it were in part paid by the faid Paxton in Confequencq of a Warrant of the Treafury, But tho' your Committee here met with a ixe\t\ Inrtance of the Sollicitorof the Treafury inter- medling in Matters relating to Elections, yet they did not think fit to examine him again, having little reafon to expect he would make any Difcoveries after the other Houfe hadreje,aae in illicit Ex- •-pcnces, are Uibjecl to heavy penal Laws, but there are none particularly adapted to the Cafe of a Minifirer who clandeftinely employs the Money of the' Publick, and tlie whole Power and profitable Eniployments that attend the collecting and difpoiing of it againli liic People ; and by this Profuiion and criminal Diflribution of Offices, in fome meafure, juflifics the Expence that particular Perfons are o- bliged to be at, by mal.ing it ncceflary to the Prefervation of all that is valuable to a Free Nation. For in that caie the Conteff is plain and viiihlc. It is, whether the Ccmmon:, fhall retain the Third State in their own Hands, whilff this whole Difpute is carried on at the Expence of ihe People, and on the Tide of the Mi- niffer. ( 12 ) nifler, out of the Money aranted to fupport and fccure the Conrtllutional la- dcpenJency of the Tlirje Branches of the Legillature. This Method of Corruption is as fure, and therefore your Committee apprehends as criminal a way of fubvertin-:; the Conititution, as by an armed Force. It is a Crime produdlive of a total Dcftruction of tlie very Being of this Government ; and is fo high and unnatural, that nothing but the Powers of Parliament reach it ; and as it can never meet with parliamentary Animadverfions, but when it is uu- fucccfsful, it mult feek for its Security in the Extent and Efficacy of the Mif- chief it produces ; and therefore your Committee apprehend it is the more ne- cellary for your Confideration, while it wants of Succefs, yet leaves an Opportu- nity to preferve and maintain your Independency for the future. Your Committee now proceed to lay before you the Conduift: of the Ear! of Orford, with relation to the quantity and manner of ifluing and receiving that Part ot the publick Money, granted for the Support of the Civil Government, which has been employed in what is commonly called Secret Services. Your Committee, having been informed that this Money had been iflued under three different Denominations, called for an Account hereunto annexed, (No. lO.) of all the Sums ill'ued for Secret Service, or for his Majefly's immediate or fpecial Service, (the Money ill'ued to his Majelly's privv Purfe excepted) or to reimburfe Expenccs during the lalt ten Years in which Robert Earl ot Orford was fiift Com- miffioner of the Treafury, iSc. And the Account having been laid before them from the Auditor of the Exchequer's Office, there appeared to be iflued under thefe three Heads only, including the annual Sum ot 3000 /. paid to eacli oi tho Secretaries of State for Secret Services, the Sum of 1,453,400/. bs. -^d. The ifluing fuch an immenfe Part of the Money, given tor the Support of the Civil Government, to thefe particular Ui'cs, during a time of profound Tranquility till the late Rupture with Spain, greatly alarmed ycur Committee, and put them upon examining what Sums had been iflued for tl;e fame Services in a former Pe- riod of the like number of Years. And your Committee beg leave to rcprcfei.t to you that exorbitant as this Sum may fecm, they would have fupprefled this part of their Report, if, by the Comparifoii they had entred upon, th;y couIJ anv w.ivs h.ive reconciled their Silence upon tliis head, to their Duty to this Houfe, and tjie Nation ; and your Committee hope, that the Period they have pitched upon, will evince the Truth of this Intention, as it comprehends a general and moft ex- pcnfive War abroad, a Dcmifc of the Crown, the happy Elfablilnment of the prefent Royal Family upon the Throne, and an open and dangerous Rebellion at home ; in ihort, everv Event that can happen to juftify extraordinary Expences in carrying on tiie Bufinefs of Government. And it is not cafy to exprefs the Surprize of your Committee, when they found by an Account laid before them, which is annexed, (No. 11.) that from the iji day of Aiiguji, 1707, to the \Ji day of Aiiguji, 1717, there was iflued under the aforefaid Heads, no more than the Sum of 337,960 /. 4^. 5 d. halfpenny. Your Committee, obferving that the Sollicitors of the Treafury for the time being, are the only Perfons to whom any of thefe Sums have been iflued that are accountable for tlie fame ; and there having been iflued to Mr. Pnxton, the prclcnt Sollicitor 68,8co /. in the lait ten Years, in which the Earl of Orford w.is hrlt Commiilioner of tlie Treafury, and the Sum of 58,516/. 2 j. 10;/. to Mr. Borret, and Mr. Cratchcrodc iucceflively Sollicitors, oetween the iji of /i:/g"./i, 1707 and the firft of Augiid i-fi]. Thefe Sums fubftradtcd from their refpective Tot:ds, the Remainder will be 1,8484,600/. b s. ^d. ifilied for Secret Services, during the lail ten Years, and 279,444 /.li. 7 d. halfpenny, iflued for the like Services f/om the Year 1707 to the Year 1717 ; by which it appears, that the Sum expend- ed on thefe Services during the lait Ten Years, amounts to near Fi\e Times as riuch as what was expended for the fame Services in the Ten Years ending the lit of Aagujl I'ji'j ; an.i your Committee cannot fee that any Exigency of Atfairs, any Diminution of the national Debt, or Acccffioii ofWealtlito tlie N.ilio;i, has liappencd 10 juitify fuch Profiilion. And though your Committee very well apprehend, that no Form ot Govcrn- mcnt can fubfilt, without a Power of employing publick. Money for Services, which arc, in their Nature, fecret, nnd ought always to remain fj ; yet v/hen fijcli ex- orbitant Sums are ill'ued lor thofe Services, as by pjfling tlirough the Hands of a Miniltcr, may become dangerous to tlie Liberties of the People, your Commit- tee thought themfelvcs inuilpenf-.bly obliged to lay it before ) lor 5047 /. 16 J. 31^. hali'iJ-nny, ~tiiere being thca otlur ( ^7 ) other Orders in the f.'.ul Revenue, Ihinding cut and nncomplied with ; for the t^um of 1562/. gs. H d. amounting; in the whole to the Sum of 30,257/. 12 s. II i/. hahrpcnny, notwithflanding, that on th;it ])ay there was but 14,284/. 17 j-. tliree P'arthings in the Exchequer, ?.ppUcab!e to the Uies of his Alaiclty's Civil Government, as appeared to your Committee, by a State laid before them of the Cafh of the Civii-Liil-Rcvcnues, on that Day ; and in order to f!icw the Irregu- larity which the fiid Earl was guilty of in the Courfe of this Affair, it is neceiiary to lay before the Iloiife, an Account of the regular Courfe of Pa\ment at the Exchequer. 'John S/bcphei d hc\ngcx3.m\ucd, fiid, that the Courfe of receiving Money in the Exchequer, is tiius : The King ifiues iiis Sign Manual for a certain Sum, which js counterfigned by the Lords of the Treafury, and thereon the Lords of tlic Treafury direfl a Warrant, figned by them to the Auditor of the Exchequer, wlio on the Receipt of it makes out an Order, fignifying that Order is taken that Payment fliaii l)e made ; this Order is fent to the Treafury, and figned by tJie Lords, and then one of the Secretaries of the Treafury figns a Letter to the Au- ditor, directing tlie Money to be ilFued when. the before-mentioned Sign Manual, V/r.iTant, and Order, are produced ; tiiat thefe Liftruments, together with the Letter,- arc carried to tlie Auditor, who dire£ts tlie Payment of the Order to one of the Tellers, and tiien fends it to the Clerk of the Fells, in order to its being recorded, but keeps the Sign Manual and the Warrant till the next Morning, x-hen upon applying to him he delivers them up to the Perfon who is to receive ■the Money, , who carries them to the Clerk of the Pells, where they are compared with the Order, and then the Clerk of tiie Pells writes them upon the Order, Gnder the Auditor's Direction, recorded fuch a Day ; then the Order beino- carried to the Tellers, the Money is paid. By this it appears that according to the regular Courfe of the Exchequer, there muft be'many Steps thro' the different Offices between the iffuing of the War- rant and the Receipt of the Money from the Tellers, which were not obferved in the cafe of the Sum, which the Earl of (Jyford did, on the gth oi February, get into his own Hands ; for it appears, tiiat this Sum was received in confequence of two ^'v^arrants, iflued in the Name of il'/r. 5i.-r<5/)i', for Secret Services, one for 8442 /. and the other for 5969 /. and one other Warrant, ifiued in the Name of Sihpha-d for Special Service, f .r 3050, and was paid to the Earl of Orford on the very Day the Warrants were ligned by him the faid Earl. This was efteiSed by depofiting the Oillers with the Bank-OfHcer at the Exchequer, before they were properly directed by the Auditor iov Mr.Mathew Collet, the principal Bank-Clerk, who at- tends at the ExchequCT', and being examined, faid, tha the paid the Money for thofe Orders to Mr. Fane, on Tuejday the g/A of February Uft, that the Orders were not direfted by t!ie Auditor, till the nth oi February following, and he did not receive the Sums for thofe Orders at the Exchequer, till the I'jth ; and Air. F^ane being examined, faid. That he received on the gth of February laft the three Sums of 8442/. of 5969/. and 3050/. as Secret Service Money. That it was from the Bank-Olficer that he received this Money, and left the Orders with him, and that the fame Day betv/een the Hours of 11 and i, he paid them altogether in one Payment to the Earl o^ Orford in his Clofet at his Houfe in Doiuiiiiig- Street ; that he took his Direftions from the faid Earl, to prepare the Warrants for thefe three Sums, and was at the fame time ordered to bring the Money to him ; and he being again further examined, faid, that on the Thurfdny preceding the Earl of Orford's Refignation of his Employments, being the ^th oi February, Mr. Scrope ordered Mr. Fane, to draw a Warrant for a Penfion of 4000/. per Annum, to Lord Orford, during the joint Lives of the King, and of the Earl, which he accordingly did, and gave it to Mr. Scrope, who returned it him the next Day, and faid, the Earl of Orford had perufcd it, and approved of it with fome imma- terial Alterations ; and when it was wrote fair, Mr. Scrspe took it again, and as Mr. Fane believes, left it with the Earl of Orford. It appears to your Committee, that one ol the other Orders, fign'd by the faid Earl on the gth of February, was for 2000 /. payable to Major Forth, under the Head of feimburfmg Expences for his Majefly's Service. And Major Forth being examin'd, faid. That he advanc'd a Sum of Money to the Duke of Bolton, for which he was to receive 7000/. at looo/. each half Year ; and that the Duke draws a Bill, direfted to Sir Robert IValpole, which runs thus : •'' I defire you will pay to Major Forth 1000/. or his Order, every half Year, for E " three ( i8 ) •" three Years and a half, to commence from Lndy-Day lad, Value receivM, " l6 Mjy., 1738." That 5/V Robert JValpole verbally accepted this Bill, but would not indorfe it : That he has receiv'd 50CO /. at five diitcrciit Payments, froia Sir Robert IFalp'Je's own Hands in Bank Notes; and that Li-rd Orford fold him, about the g//j of February lall, That a ^Varrant w^s fign'J tor the 2CC0 /. unpaid^ which was the firft Order that had paf>'d through the 'IVeafuiy. Your Committee being further deilrous to inform themfelves in what Manner the vafl: Sums iifued for Secret Service \'-::z accounted for to iiis Majefty, fent for Mr. Tilfon^ who being examin'd, faid. That when his Majefty fign'd a Sign Manual for the paying of any Sum of Money to Mr. Scrope, for Secret Service, he alfo llgn'd at the fame time a Receipt to A'lr. Scrape for the fame Sum, but that there v/as alv/ays a Blank left for the Date, and the Dates are at the fame time put in at the Treafury to the Warrant, the Order, the Sign Manual, and the Kinii's Receipt ; and this is uTuallv done by the Entering-Clcrk, who wrote the Sign Manual, that it may all appear in the lame Hand : 'J'hat the Date of the Receipt is always made the fame as the Date of the Order. And he produc'd to vour Committee a Paper, the Copy whereof is here inserted, and is as foliov/s ; ''GEORGE R. " We acknowledge to have receiv'd of our trufiy and well-heloved 'John Scrape, " Efq; the Sum of 5969 /. being the fame Sum which in purfuance of an Order, " bearing Date this Day, was ifl'aed to him, at the Receipt of Our Excheqiur " for Our Secret Service. Given at our Court of ^i.^rtwi^^'j, ths^thoiFsbrmrry, " 1741, in the 15th Year of Our Reign. ''GEORGE R. " Examined. O p. F o p. d. " And your Committee being inform'd, that the Paper dcliver'd by Mr. Tilfon •was the Hand-writing of A'lr. Thzmas irHkim, fent for him ; and he being ex- amin'd, faid. That the faid Paper was his Hand-writing, and was by him copied -from a Paper deliver'd to him by Mr. Tilpn, and which he believ'd was an Ori- ginal : 1 iiat lie has never feen the King write, but he has fecn many Sign Manuals, and he thinks there was the fjme Hand to that Paper : That he has never feen the Earl of Orford wiite, but what was to the Paper, he copied, was like what he had (a^n for the Earl of Orfard's Hand : That he believes the Copy he fliade was not examin'd, but he copied it exadlU', Word for Word, and took the Sums and Dates exa<5lly, and b'.lieves it was a true Copy. Your Committee cannot but obfervc, that this Receipt is for one of thofe very Sums which Mr. Fane receiv'd bv Anticipation of the Bank-OScer, the gth of February, and which was not really ifJ'ued at the Receipt of the Exchequer tdl the lyth ol February, and never went into the Hands oi Mr. Scrcpe, but was immedi- ately carried to Lord Orford. \o\\- Committee were at a Lofs to know, what was meant by thofe W'ords, Examined, Orford, it being impo'Iible to mean the witnefling to his Majelty's Receipt of it from Air. Scrape on that Day ; for JWr. Scrape nev,er had the Money, and therefore could not pay it Into his Majelly's Flands, as that wculd imply. Nor have your Committee been able to inform themfelves, whether or no this is con- formable to any antient and regular Way of difcharging Perfons for the Receipt offuch Sums, or a modern Invention. And in order to clear up this, and other Matters of far greater Importance, your Committee rpply'd to the Houfe for Leave to examine John Scrape, Eki; in con- fequence whereof he did attend on the ^th of June, inftant, when he did acquaint the Committee, That he had read the Oath and found it to be a flrong one, and defir'd the Opinion of the Committee how he was to behave : That if they in- tended to examine him about the Secret Service Jvloney, he doubted he could not anfwer without having his R4ajeity's Leave : And he faid he was tender of doi.ng any thing that might leave a Stain upon his (ilharacler ; thougb he believes he can give no Information to the Committee more than what they have already got. And then he withdrew. And then Mr. Scrape was again call'd in, and the Chair- man inform'd him, Tiiat the Coi^imicttee had confider'd of what lie had faid, and he ( ^9 ) he was direfled to acquaint liim, tliat they did not think themfelves to be in a Si- tuation to dirc(5l or advife in the Affair ; but the Committee defir'd to know, whether he would fubmit to take the Oath or not ? To v/hich A^r. Scrope an- fwer'd, I hope you will give me Time to ccnfuler of it, as being a Matter of great Confequence ; and then he witlidrevv : Upon wliich the Committee appointed huii to attend on the 14!'/-' inllant 'June ; on which Day he did accordin'^Iy attend, and your Committee being inform'd, that he defir'd to (peak with the Chairman and the Committee, he v/as call'd in and ask'd, V\^hat he had to fay ? Whereupon jVI?-. Scrope faid, He was cxtrcamly forry that he fliould give the Committee fo much Trouble, for he did aflure them, that his Refufal was not pre- meditated, for he came tlie other Day refolved to take the Oath, tho' he had then Doubts if he fliould anfwcr in what related to Secret Service Money, and he thought he might have made his Objcdions, when he was examin'd to it ; and ac- cordingly began to take the Oath ; but when he came to the general Words, he found them to be fo ftrcng, and general, that he doubted if he fhould not be guilty of Perjurv, if he fnould take the Oath and not anfuer. That he had improved the Time theCommitree had been fo kind to give him, and had confulted with the abkfr Lawyers and Divine;:, and they have made h.is Scruples flronger ; and tiiat he did not do it to obllrudt the Enquiry, but could not as an honeftMan, and with a fafe Confcience, take tiie Oatli ; that he had laid liis Cafe before the King, and was authorized to fay, " That the Difpofai of Mo- " ney ifiu'd for Secret Service, by the Nature of it, requires the utmoft Secre- " cy, and is accounted for to His Majefty only, and therefore His Majeily cou'd " not permit him to difclofe any Thing en that Subject." That he had well confidered with himfelf, and confulted other Pcrfons, and thinks lie fhould be criminal if he took a general Oath, when there were parti- cular Queitions Vi-hich he did not intend to anfwer ; that he hoped he fhould not incur tlie Difpleafure of the Committee, for if the Oath was confined, he was ready to be examined. Which Behaviour of Mr. Scrope greatly furpriz'd your Committee, confider- ing the Information they had received from the many Papers relating to the Se- cret Service, which had been laid before them, and from the Examination of the Mefiengers, and the moft knowing and a£live Clerks in the Office where he is Secretary. Mr. Scrope ha\ing thus refufed to anfwer to this material Part of this Enquiry, your Committee beg Leave to obferve, that thofe Sums which are fpecify'd to be for Secret Service, and v^hich lia\e always been ifl'u'd in Mr. Scrape's Name, are the only Money for which His Majefty gives a Receipt, and may therefore be all that the Crown conceives to be ifiu'd without Account ; for the fpecious Titles of Special Service, and to reimburfe Expences, feem, from the very Phrafe, to imply fome Account ; and what is iflu'd to the Sollicitor of theTrea- fur}', under the Head of reimburfing Expences, is actually accounted for, fo that His Majefly may poffibly be led to believe, that all the Money iilu'd under thefe Heads is accounted for, as he gives no Receipt for the fame; and that it may happen, that I'y the Artifice of a Minifler, fuch Sums of Money may b« ifTu'd under the Heads of Special Service and to reimburfe Expences, as may endanger the publick Liberty, while the Crown may be ignorantof the fame, and by attending only to wliat is fpecify'd to be for Secret Service, may believe that Service is kept within reafonable Bounds. Thefe are the moff remarkable Particular? that your Committee think proper to lay before you, relating to the Head of Secret Service, which, if it be confi- dered either by Comparifon, or by its Conl'equences, either by the Sum, or the Manner of its IlTue and Receipt, are equally exorbitant, dangerous, and defiructive. If it be confidered by the grofs Comparifon, then it ffands as above ; as 1,384,600/. bs. 3^. to 279,444/. is. jd. Halfpenny; if by defcending into Particulars, then it will appear, that the two remarkable Years 1733 and 1734, amount to 312,128/. 19^. ']d. being confidcrably more than tlie Total of the whole Ten Years, from 1707 to 17 17. And what is moft afionifhing, the Demands for Secret Service, in the fix Weeks inimediately preceding the Pvefignation of the Earl of Orford, amount to more than the whole Expence, upon that Head, in the Three Years ending AuguJ} 1710, and the Draughts upon the Exchequer for that life, in one Day on- ly, being the gth Day of February laft (the laft indeed he fat at the TreafuryJ amount shiount to a gre.iter Sum th.ir was ilTued for that SL-rvicc, in any one of the afore- :nTeiition'd Three Years, fo gloriouflydiftinguHhed by repeated Victories. And if the Confeqiicnces of this Profufion be confidered, what can they be biit the Alteration of a Government, which fo lately was fiipportcd in that Branch for one iifth Part of the Expence upon the medium of the ten ^'ears. \our Committee have informed you how the Power, the Influence, the Offices of the Government have been imployed by him towards violating the Freedom of your Eledions ; and they apprehend thcv have juft Grounds to fufpecl that Part ofthefe immenfeSums have been expended for the fame moft pernicious Purpofe ; and the rather when they coiifuler from what Queftion the obftinate Silence oi Paxton took its Rife, as alfo what Sums luue been given towards the defraying tlie Expences of the new \2\vxrx.cr At Radnor, and to carry on theProfcculions at Culchefter, as alfo the ftron;; Probability of the fame Practice being carried on with Regard to th? Borough cit" Or ford ; befides the remarkable Sum to Lever, as a Reward to a moft unjull re- turning OiEcer, ceni'ur'd by, and aftually under the Punifiim.ent of I'arliament, ' as a Violator of the Liberties of his Country. Nor are the Appreiienfions of your Committee at all lefl40 Date of the Bill,. By 'whom draivn. 21 3 '3 '7 18 >9 '4 7 1 1 12 13 '4 zi 23 24 25 27 29 30 I '9 22 23 26 24 27 28 30 3' >S 16 '3 14 «7 18 >9 29 6 u 12 '5 18 19 20 ZI 27 28 4 5 8 '4 Feb. 1740.^ March Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. April 1741. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. May Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. June. Ditto. July Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Auguft Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Sept. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. , )Mr Geo. Hinde. Sum. /. . /. zoo 00 250 00 ioo 00 200 00 200 00 100 00 50 CO 150 00 100 CO r -^N 2CO 200 150 248 00 00 100 00 200 00 150 00 150 00 200 00 ICO 00 IOO 00 50 00 170 00 400 00 600 CO 150 00 100 00 200 00 00 00 IOO 00 200 00 400 00 600 00 150 00 130 00 200 00 150 CO 160 00 150 00 200 00 70 00 100 00 ICO 00 70 00 70 00 162 II 200 00 500 CO 250 00 200 00 IOO 00 IOO 00 IOO 00 200 00 IOO 00 2C0 00 150 00 150 00 n n 3 150 200 00 00 I oco 00 400 00 co- co 00 00 00 CO 00 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^35 00 00 00 CO 00 00 CO CO 00 00 00 00 00 COy O0~\ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 / 26' oa. 40 ( 2) ^ 1 ^ Dale of the By ivhom Sum. Date of the By luhom Sum. Bills. Jraivn. Bill!. draixn. ^ I. s. d. j^ I. s. d. 26 Oa. I74I.S 800 00 oo"> •c 29 Dec. 1739.^ 200 00 00 ■ 1 3 27 Ditto. 16S 4 I 18 March ICO 00 CO 1 ' 29 Ditto. 200 00 00 Q 14 July 1740. 90 00 00 Lo 31 Ditto. 400 00 00 a Ditto. no 00 00 3 Ditto. 170 00 00 23 Sept. 150 00 00 1 21 Ditto. 2000 00 00 27 Nov. 200 00 00 J Ditto. 100 00 00 >4o 14 Apr. 1741 . By Roll. Kerhy, 200 00 00 ■ 1 23 Ditto. \ Mr Geo. Wtnie. 300 300 00 00 22 Ditto. \ Naval-Officer \ at Port Jnto- 100 00 00 •39 22 January 00 00 24 Ditto. 100 00 00 1 6 February 1000 00 00 13 June ma. loo 00 eo 1 Ditto. 500 00 00 22 Ditto. loo 00 00 i / Ditto. 200 CO 00 28 Auguft loo 00 00 \ Ditto. ■ 1 000 00 CO 31 Ditto. 100 00 00 > 8 Ditto. 100 00 00 3 Sept. 13 Oftober 100 00 00 1 9 Ditto. J 1200 00 00 100 00 00 V L J 19 Ditto. J 100 00 00 , ) Richard Haddock, John Foster, J a. Achworth, John Fhillipfon, Thomas Pearfe. An Account of the Sums of Money drawn by Bills from, or by Bills remitted to, Ja- maica., for the Service of His Majefty's Ordnance, fince the Commencement of the War againft Spain, and at what Rates of Exchange the fame were drawn. Drawers. Dates. Rate of Exchange, ^1 o e B o O 'Capt. William Douglas --.-....-- 1739 Dec. 28 Thomas Broderick Eebr. 23 George Berkeley - 31 Charles Windham ........23 Edward Bofcawen March i F. Percival 19 Thomas Watfon - 22 Digby Dent 1740 May 8 Charles Knowles --------- 30 Edward Bofcawen - 1739 Feb. 3 Charles Windham 1740 May 8 George Burrifh --- 1739 Dec. 20 Edward Bofcawen 1740 June 21 P. Mayne Aug. 20 Thomas Trevor ----.. -.--20 William Knight - - - - 25 George Berkeley Sept. 4 Digby Dent --23 William Douglas 'Oft. 8 M. Stapykon June 19 140 per Cent. In Sterling 140 per Cent. In Sterling 140 per Cent. Sum Sterling. /. s. d. f. '4 Drawers. John- Rogers, Storekeeper at Jamaica. \ Dates. 1 740 oa. Jan 1741 June 18 Rate of Exchange. I 140 per Cent. 135 per Cent. Sum SterUng. 100 00 00 300 00 00 500 00 00 f 1 741 June 26 John Tuhter, Commifiary and Pay-mafter to the / Train of Artillery. Dec. oa. 130 per Cent. 140 per Cent. 1 400 00 00 500 00 , 00 700 00 QO 200 00 00 1 00 00 00 200 00 QO 400 00 00 ! 00 00 00 1 00 00 00 1 82 10 00 Nov. 9 137 10 per Cent 100 00 00 Drawer. (3 ) Drawers. John Turnir, Commiflary and Pay-mafter to the , Train of Artillery. > Dates, Rate of Exchange. Sum Sterling.' /. X. V. f 1 741 Dec. 18 ^ ' 200 00 00 Jan. 26 400 00 00 Feb. 9 29; 8 6 9 75 00 00 9 9 > HOI^rCent. -° - - 9 1 34 00 00 9 365 3 9 9 250 00 00 V 9J ^ §00 00 00 All the foregoing Bills are drawn from Jamaica. No Bills have been remitted to Jamaica. Received Advice of the following Bills drawn from Jamaica, but as they are not yet arriv'd, the Rates of Exchange are not known. Drawers. Dates. John Turner. • . - Major Jonathan Lewis. {1741 Oa. 27 ■) Dec. 4 J Sum Sterling. /. s. J. 100 00 00 429 10 00 1 74 00 00 150 00 00 600 00 00 Office of Ordnance, jipri/17, 1742. W. R. E A R L E, Clerk of the Ordnance. Nu M Bfi ft (3) Number II. CAPT. Alexander JPllfon being examineJ in the mod folemn Manner, this 2ift Day of ylpril, 1742, faid, that he was an Agent to Lord Cathcart, when he was preparing for his Expedition to the JVeJl-Ind'ies. That in or about May or 'June, 1740, Lord Cathcart received from Mr Pelbam a rough Draught of Iiiftruflions, which Mr Pelham propofed to give to his Deputy Pay- jnaftcr, that was to attend the Troops under Lord Cathcart. That this Exami- nant perufed the faid Draught together with Lord Cathcart. That it contained Diredtions to the Deputy to pay the Troops at Jamaka, at fuch a Rate of Ex- change, as ftiould appear to Lord Cathcart and the fuperior Officer?, to be moft ad- vantageous to them. That this Rate of Exchange fhould be conftant and invaria- ble ; and that the faid Deputy fiiould keep an Account current of what he thus paid ; and if any Advantage accrued from the Currency thus fettled, the Publick were to be entitled to it, but if there vvas any Lofs, the Publick were to make it good ; and it was alfo propofed, that the Deputy fhould carry with him a Sum of Money for this Purpofe, and fhould be authorized to draw the necefTary Bills on the Pay- mafler-General. That Lord C(7//;^(7r/ approved of thefe Inftrudlions ; but on or about the latter End o( June, or the Beginning of July, 1740, it was intimated to Lord Cathcart from the Pay- Office, or by Meflieurs Burrell or Briflow, that the Treafury were of Opinion, that the Troops were not to be left to the Uncertainty of finding Money abroad, fmce Merchants might make their Advantages of the Neceflities the Troops might be fometimes under, and that in Confequence of thij Opinion, a Contract for paying the Troops at the Rate of 120/. Jamaica Money, for 100/. Sterling, was then dependijig before the Treafury. That Lord Cathcart immediately on this Information, applied, by this Examinant, to Mr iniliams and Mr Monfons Offices for a Meeting. His declared Purpofe in procuring this Meeting, was, if poffible, to get the Troops paid in a more advantageous Manner; for he did not apprehend, that the Contract was already pad, but only that it was then depending. That at this Meeting, which was at Mr IVilliami's Office, be- tween the 4th and 13th of July, 1740, there was prefent Lord Cathcart, Mr Han- bury [Filliams, Pay-mafler of the Marines, Mr Burrell, and Mr Brijlow, and this Examinant, Mr Pelham was then in Tork/hire with Mr Arundel, as he believes. Lord Caihcart'took notice of the Inconveniences which might arife by paying Men only 120/. Jamaica Money, for 100 A Sterling, when by the concurring Reports from Jamaica, and of Merchants, the Exchange was at 13S to 140. That he men- tioned hereupon what he had obferved in Armies abroad, particularly what hap- pened at Ghent and Bruges in 17 12, where the Troops mutinied, on Account of fome fmall Dedudtions for Camp NecefTaries and Bread, which were taken from fome Regiments and not from others. That this Examinant faid at the fame Time, that as the Troops from North America, under Colonel Blakeney, were paid at the full Currency of the Exchange in thofe Parts, he apprehended, that if they re- ceived lefs Money, when they joined Lord Cathcart, than what they had before, they might begin a Muting', and by informing Lord Cathcart's Men, might occa- fion Difcontents or Mutiny amongft them alfo. The Contraftors arWwered to this, that the Difference of Currency in the North Provinces of America, from whence Colonel Blaiene)'s Troops came, was rather more to the Advantage of thofe Troops, than the intended Payment of 120 per Cent. That the Contraflors ex- plained themfelves on this Particular, in a Manner that this Examinant could not anfwer, nor indeed underftand. That Lord Cathcart was filent. The Con- tra<3ors reckoned up feveral Articles of the Charge it would be to them, fome of •which were the Infurance of the Money, the Freight, the Commiffion, which they ■were to pay their Correfpondents in Jamaica, with other incident Charges, which this Examinant cannot remember. All thefe together, they faid was the Caufe that they could not contradt for lefs Profit, than what they fhould get by paying 120/. Jamaica Currency, for 100/. Sterling. There was fome other Talk upon this Affair, which all ended in A-Ieffieurs Burrell and BriJIow (but thinks it was Mr Burrell) declaring, that they had made an Agreement with the Treafury al- ready upon thefe Terms, and that they could not do it for lefs Profit. That this Declaration of Mr Burrdl's put an End to the Debates, and the Meeting ; for ( 5) for Lord Cathcart acquiefced in what the Treafury thought fit, as he was under Orders. He was a polite Man, and did not choofe to fignify his Difapprobatioa when it was of no Confequence. So on the faid Declaration, he faid he was to be determined by fuperior Powers ; but in private Converfation afterwards with this Examinant, he wiflied it had been better. That this Examinant cannot of his own Knowledge fay, what Steps had been taken with the Treafury, with Relation to the firft intended Inftruiflions, nor does he know of any publick Notice given by the Treafury for receiving Propofals, nor has he heard of any Propofals from others, but Meflieurs Burrell and Brijlow : But he is not in the Waf^f Treafury Affairs. Being further examin'd on the 27th Day oi April 1742, in relation to the rough Draught of the Inftrutive of that Refufal was, that thefe Faftors had in View the appropriating the Profits to arife by fuch Supply, to themfelves. What Reafons they may have given to their Principals, I cannot fay ; but at this Place, to juftify, or at lead excule, fo uncommon a Procedure, they fay Mcffieurs BurrdL and Bri/Iow did not propofe to allow them a fufficient Commiffion or Provifion ; that it was not worth their while to undertake it for a Confideration of One per Cent, to each of them. The Truth is, they were dazzled with the Profpct^ of get- ting 15 or 20 inftead of 1 per Cent, and reckoning that a much greater Sum than thofe Gentlemen receiv'd from the Treafury, in July., would be due to the Forces before they arrived here, finding Novetnbcr almofl: out, they made their Calcubtion, that they fhould be able to fet their own Price upon what they imagined the De- puty Pay-mafters would be under a Neceflity of taking from them. But the fur- ther Supply you ifiued to Meffieurs Burrelt and Brijiow in September, and for which they gave their Bill upon me, has put me in a Condition to anfwer all Occafions hitherto, and difconcerted all their Meafures. I perceived the General inclined to think favourably of the Intentions of thefe Perfons, and yet it was not till the 25th of January, that he appeared convinced that they never intended to furnifh Money upon the Account of the Gentlemen in England; at which Time Mr Manning declared in exprefs Terms, in the Pre- knc^ oi GtntxA IVentworth, Mr Stewart, Lieutenant-Governor of this Ifland, and other Gentlemen, that they would not anfwer Meffieurs Burrell and Brifiow'^ Credit. This was the i6th Day after I delivered Meffieurs 5a?rf// and 5r//?(jw;'s Letters of Credit to them, and made my Demand on them. What pafl between me and them, and with General IFentivorth, in that Interim, you will pleafe to fee by the Copies of the Letters I fend herewith. Upon the Refufal of Mereiuether and Manning to furnifh Money, General IFent- ivorth defired me to flay in this Place, and endeavour to raife Money for the \]k of the Troops, which I have undertaken, purfuant to the Inffrudfions you have ho- noured me with ; and I hope my Zeal for His Majcfty's and your Service, will receive your Approbation. I have Reafon to think, that as Merewether and Manning expedted to fupply what Money the Troops might have occafion for, at an immoderate Profit to themfelves, that I fliall meet with all poffible Oppofition from them and their Ad- herents, otherwife I could not have failed of finding all the Money I can poffibly want, for Bills. What the Event will be, I cannot fay, with fufHcient Certainty, more than that my Endeavours will be faithful, and I hope efFcdual. Meffieurs Mereivether and Manning acquainted me the gth of January, that they had fo long ago as the End of November, wrote to Meffieurs Burrell and BriJloWy to tell them, that whatever Sums were wanted here for the Forces, mufl be fent in Specie from England. They knew, that an Anfwer to thofe Advices could not well come back to this Ifland till Jpril or May, and expefled in the mean Time to ( i6 ; to have fupplied Money to the Troops upon their own uiijuft Terms, This faith- lefs Treatment of their Principals, muft have aitoniflied and deceived Meffieurs Burrell and Brljlow, till the Truth comes to be developed by fubfequent Letters ; and upon what you will have heard from them, you have certainly been induced to fend over more Specie, a thing that would have in no Cafe been neceflary, if thefe Perfons had not entred into the moft ungrateful and unnatural Combination, to difcredit their Benefadtors, and diftrefs the publick Service ; and infinuating to Brigadier Blakeney, that themfelves only were in a Condition to fupply the Troops, which for the Sake of the Service, as an Act of great Merit, they would find Means to do at the Rate of no, this Currency, for loo/. Sterling. (C) Mr COLEBROOKE to Mv P E L H A M. Kingston, Febr. 24, 1740. SIR, I Gave Notice that I had occafion for a Supply of Money for the Service, and offered my Bills at 130 Jamaica Currency, for lOoA Sterling; and not- withftanding feveral things combine to make Money fcarce, I have made a Beginning, and pafled Bills upon you for 1,250/. Sterling, as is noted at the Foot. ^. 500 to John Hamilfon, Efq; value of the fame. 200 to Robert JFilfon, value of John Ham'tlton. 300 to John Eajl, value of Samuel Spofforth. 100 to Samuel Spofforth, value of the fame. 150 to Jacob Mendes da Cojia, value of David Bravo. £. 1250 all under this Day's Date, payable at three Days Sight. Which Sum of 1250/. Sterling, at the Rate of 130, making 1625/. Jamaica Car- rency, I pafs to the Credit of the Right Hon. Henry Pelham, Efq; Mr COLEBROOKE to Mr PELHAM. Kingston, Jamaica^ March 23, 1740. SIR, I Have now the Pleafure to acquaint you, that the Combination that had been formed here to reduce the Price of Bills for the publick Service to no, is en- tirely diflipated. The Confederates lately made a new Effort to put a Stop to the Supplies of Money, which they found coming into my Hands, by endeavour- ing to borrow all the Money they could hear of; but I have now happily overcome all Oppofiticn, and can afilire you on good Grounds, that whatever Money may be neceflary to be raifed for the Service, will be found hfire for Bills on you at 130 and upwards. I fay this with Confidence from the State and Courfe of the Trade here ; and I dare venture to advife you not to fend any more Money from England in Specie, upon Account of any Doubt of my findinj; all that can pofTibly be wanted for the Ufe of His Majefly's Forces ; and I think I am not miftaken in my Conclufion, if a War fhould break out with France, I fhall find Money at 140 this Currency, for every 100/. Sterling; becaufe as the Rifque of fending Money ( 17 ) Money Home will be greater, the Premium of Infurance muft rife in Proportion, and People will give a grt'.ter Price for fach Bills of Exchange, as they find by- Experience are regularly difcharged. Here-under is an Account of all the Bills I have pafTed upon you ; the 24th of February, for 1250/. at 130, is 1625 /. the Qth of March for 2420/. at 130, is 3146; and the liih oi March, for 1285/. Sterling at 130, is 1670/. lo^. for all which Sums I make myfelf Debtor according to the refpedive Dates. BILLS drawn by John Colebrooke, for the Ufe of His Majejlfs Forces in America, iipoti the Right Hon. Henry Pelham, Efq; Fay-majler General of His Majejiy's Forces. Feb. 24. N'. I. 500/. Sterling, Order John Hamilton, Efq; value of the fame. 2. 200 /. Order Robert JVilfon, value of 'John Hamilton, Efq; 3. 300 /. Order John Eaji, value of Samuel Spofforth. 4. 100 L Order Samuel Spofforth, value of the fame. 5. 150 /. Order David Mendes da Cojla, value of David Bravo. 1250/. Sterling at 130, makes y^^wtf/Va Currency. — 1625/, Mar. 9. No, 6. 500 /. Sterling, Order Edward Trelawney, Efq; value of the fame. 7. 120/. OtAet John Hamilton, value of the fame. 8. 250/. Order Pat. Taylor, value of the fame. 9. 200/. Order John Douce, value of John Peete. 10. 500/. Order Juda Supino and Son, value of Jac. Pareira I.-iendii. 11. 500 /. Order James Douglas of London, value of Murray Crimhle. 12. 300/. Order James Murray, value of the fame. 13. 50 /. Order Jof. Nott, value of the fame. 2420/. Sterling at 130, makes Currency at Jamaica, — 3146/. Mar. 18. No. 14. 200/. Sterling, Order Strachan and TVilfon, value of the fame. 15. 200/. Order Papillon and Benjamin Ball, value of Murray Crymble. 16. 200/. Order John and James Porter, value of the fame. 17. 100 /. Order Robert de Lap and Comp. value of the fame. 18. 80/. Order James Taylor, value of the fame. ig. 130 /. Order Alexander Barclay, value of David Barclay. 20. 325 /. Order Robert and John Hamilton, value of the fame, 21. 50/. Order Matthew Cleveland, value of Robert and John Hamilton. I. s. 128^1- Sterling at 130, mikes Jamaica Currency. 1670 10 Total 6441 10 . , . , ^ Mr COLEBROOKE to Mr PELHAM. Kingston, Jamaicay May I, 1741. SIR, 1 Advifed you the 23d of March, of having drawn upon you 21 Bills of Exchange, ■'■ under fcveral Dates, amounting to 4955 /. Sterling. I have fince drawn 7757^- 1 1 ^. 2d. in other 24 Bills, as here-under, and make myfelf Debtor for the refpedive Sums under each Date. E .lam ( i8 ) I am now quite fure of raifing Money at 130/. and upwards, to any Amount, that fliall be required, provided a proper Notice is given". Account of B IL L S drawn by John Colebrooke, upon the Right Ho7ioiirable Henry Pelham, EJq-, Pay-majler General^ for the life of the prefent Expedition. I74I March 24. No. r 22 1 300 1500 /. ^^3 100 24 100 L25 1000 April 6, ~ 26 500 27 200 28 50 29 100 30 150 31 400 D7 /. II 5. 2^.< 32 33 300 450 34 1000 35 36 200 150 37 38 207 800 39 500 40 200 . 41 200 JprU 24. %a 100 850/. J 43 ^ 44 200 350 45 200 300 Sterling to Alexander Campbell, value of the fame, to Ditto — — — Ditta to Abr' Van Hoorn, yohn Hamilton, to David Tavares himfelf. to Pandofo and Paniero themfelves. to yohn Fergufon, Thomas Stratton. to ynhn Hamilton himfelf. Ditto — — Ditto. Ditto — — Ditto. Daniel Dias Fernandas, A. and S. Dias Fernandas. Aaron Loufada, J. and B. Loufada. Samuel Stork, John Curtin. Ifaac Fuertado himfelf. Ab. de For^feca, M. and A. La Mera. Pereira (S Li?na, A. La Mera. 112 Jacob Brandon himfelf. Daniel Mendes da Cojla himfelf. , Juda Supino and Son, Ifaac P. Mendes. 'Pat. Taylor himfelf. Ditto — — Ditto. I Villi am Groves himfelf. Jac. Mcrides da Cojla, David Bravo. J of. Polander himfelf. Taylor and Jack/on themfelves. Which Sums of 1500/. Sterling, drawn the 24th of Af arch, and 5407/. lis. 2d. the 6th o( Jpril, and 850/. the 24th o( April, I pafs to the Credit of the Right Honourable Henry Pelha.mt Efq; at the Rate of 130 Jamaica Currency for 100 /. Sterling, in his Account of Exchanges, under the rcfpeflive Dates. John Colebrooke., Mr COLE- ( 19) ( F ) Mr COLEBROOKE to Mr PELHAM. Dated Sept. i, 1741. SIR, IN purfuance of your Command, in the fecond Paragraph of your Letter of the Twenty fifth of jl//7y, about the Difcontent of the Troops, on Occafion of their being paid at the Rate of 120 /. Jamaica Currency, for 100 /. Sterling, it is my Duty to acquaint you, that the Par of Money between England and Ja- maica is I s. d. I. s. d. Piftoles at o 16 8 Sterling 139 Jamaica 142 i '' Guineas at i i 189 ^38 1 Moedas i 7 ■ 118 9 143 ^ Portugal Pieces — i 16 2 10 138 To which adding 6 per Cent, for Freight and Infurance from Jamaica to London, the Medium upon Gold is — — — — — — — — 149 Pieces of 8, 7^-3 '^- per Ounce Jamaica ^ f. 6 d. London Vii — — — — — — ^39^6 S Hi 11 Pieces 7 J. id. — — ^ s. 6 d. — — — ^34 .'i Medium 135 } to wtiich adding G per Cent, for Freight and Infurance as before upon Silver, is — — • — — — — — — — — 143 I mentioned in my laft of September 12, that the Officers of the Independant Companies here draw for their Pay according to the Courfe of Exchange, now 140, ardpay the private Men at 125. I have learnt, that when the Regiments of Cope and Hay arrived in this Hand, the Affembly, in Confideration of the Dearnefs of all Neceffaries, then pafTed an Adt to make them an Allowance of Provifioiis at the Country's Expence ; and I am well informed, that Provifions are at tliis time fifty per Cent, dearer than they were then. I confirm, that the OfKcers of the Independant Companies, have an Allowance of twenty Shillings, and each private Man five Shillings per Week, for which 10,000/. is raifed annually by the AfTembly. My Duty requires me to fecond your Zeal in His Majefty's Service to the utmoft of my Ability, in the Deportment you have pleafed to honour me with ; and it is with Joy that I can inform you, that by Oicafion of the great Sum of Money ifTued by you, and brought to this Place in Spc-cie, the Combination entered into to diflrefs me in raifing Money for the Ufe of the Troops by lowering the Exchange, has been entirely broken ; and from thence, and the State of the Trade to the Spanijh Coaft, there is Reafon to be afTured that the Exchange will keep up to 140, not without a Probability of its being raifed higher by proper Management ; and as this favourable Circumliance may be the Rieans of producing very confiderable Relief to the Troops by paying them at a higher Rate hereafter ; I hope you will look upon it as an Inftance of my Ambition to make my Services agreeable to you, that I offer myfelf to undertake to draw Bills upon you at the beft Courfe of the Ex- change. The Intereft of the Merchants fending Goods to Jamaica is againft the Rife of the Exchange, but I perfuade myfelf I fliall be as fuccefsful in this Attempt, as I have been hitb.erto in your Service; and I am fo well afTured ot what I advance, that fhould you prefer the having a certain Price fixt, I am ready to furnifh any Sum of Money wanted for His Majefly's Forces at 135 certain Price, without anv Charge, and that my Bills bear no lefs Term than fdur Months after Date, or fixty Days after Sigiit ; and that I will not trouble the Office with fmall Bills, but pafs one i)i two Months, or one Month theohenclt. I fent ( 20) I fent farther to Mr, Pitt, for the Ufe of the Forces on Cuba 6285 /. 15 s. by the Defiance, Capt. Trevor, which failed yefterday. / am Sir, Tour mji Obedient, and Kingjlon, Jamaica^ mojl humble Servant Sept. I, 1 741. John Colebrooke, (G ) Mr COLEBROOKE to Mr PELHAM. Dated "Jamaica^ Sept. 7, 1 74 1. SIR, THE DifTatisfaftion of the Officers receiving their Pay at I20 this Currency, for every 100/. Sterling, increafes every Day, and now I have found Means to bring the Exchange to 140, they complain of it as a very great Hardfliip. I had formerly reprefented to the General upon this Occafion, that the Price of 120 was fixed by Contrad of the Treafury with MefTrs. Burrell and Brifiow. That your Inftruftions to me to pay the Troops at that Rate was in Con- formity to that Contradt, under the Suppofition, that it was the moft that could be obtained. That it was not to be imagined, that you could order the Troops to be paid at a higher Exchange than the Price fixt with the Contralei/iber lad ; alfo a Letter from Brigadier-General Guifi, dated the 4th a\ Seplc?nbcr, to all which your Lordfliips are pleafed to require our Anfwer ; in Obedience thereto, we beg Leave to lav before you, in the firft Inftance, the Reafons upon which our Contradt was founded in its original Price of 120, and Augmentation afterwards to 125. The RuJj for fixina; any Price of Exchange could only be found by the Probability of the Rate at which Monev might be raifed in 'Jama'ua; and in order to attain that Knowledge, we endeavoured to procure Bills here on "Jamaica, but could not fucceed even at 120 I. It is well known, the Ifland of Jamaica has no Species of its own* but is fupplied chiefly, if not intirely, by what it draws from the Spanijh J'/eJi- Iiidies, for Ballance of Trade, and of this a very fmail Quantity does or can remain in the Ifland ; for this Reafon, becaufe Silver in which that Ballance is paid, bears a higher Pries in England, in Proportion to the Exchange, than it does at 'Jamaica; and the Currency of the IHand is fo inconfidcrable, that it is extremely difficult to recover Debts of any Kind, but in Sugar, or fome other Produce of the Plan- tation. The Par of Exchange between England and 'Jamaica is deemed to be 125 /. for every lOo/. Sterling; but as the Exchange between any two IMaces depends upon many Contingencies, and Incidents, no fixt Price or Courfe can be afcertained, but as more or Icfs Money is to be paid at one Place or the other, it mufl eternally vary. The Exchange might be at 125 cr higher, whilft the Illand of Jamaica re- mained on the fame Footing with regard to England, which it had been for many Years ; but the Moment England was obliged to pay fo large a Sum in 'Jamaica, for Subfiftance of the Troops, the Cafe muft; alter, as it did with regard to Col. Blakeney, who, before the Arrival of the Forces under General jyentwsrth, could with Difficulty raife a fmall Sum for Subfiftance of the American Regiment at 120; and had not this inevitable Confequencc been tbrefcen by us, and the Money for the whole to have been raifed upon the Ifland, no Man can fay at what Rate the Perfons in PofTeffion of the Currency would have given ir, or what Price the Exchange would have fallen to ; but if a Judgment may be formed from the above Inftance, it muft have been greatly under 120. The Pay of an Independant Com- pany cannot bear a Parallel with the prefent Cafe, as there is no Proportion in the Sums to be raifed. Upon thefe Confiderations it became incumbent upon us, for the Publick Service, as well for our own Safety, to remove the Difficulties, which attended the raifmg the Money there. And the only Expedient left to avoid the Impofition of the Perfons, who were in Pofleffion of the Currency, was to provide a new one, in fome Meafure, independent of them. This we did, by fending cut, at our own Rifque and Charge, the proper Funds for that Purpofe. And your Lord- fhips were pleafed to direct the Payment of a Sum of Money to us, upon our fur- nifliing the Pay-mafter- General our Bills on Jamaica for the Amount; which was accordingly done, and the Bills puniTlually difcharged. The Receipt of this Money at Jamaica had the defired Effect, as it broke a Combination, which was adtually entered into, to lower the Exchange and diftrefs the Service, and by which Monies were foon raifed by Draughts from thence at 130, which enabled us alter the Price from 120 to 125. And as this Money was the fole Caufe of fupporting the Exchange in the Begin- ning, fo that, together with what has been fmce fcnt out, and the great Re- duftion of the Pay from the fatal Mortality among the Troops, muft be attribu- ted the further Rife of the Exchange to 135 and 140. And we beg leave to re- mark, that had the Money fent out by us mlfcarried, the Exchange muft have been governed by the arbitrary Will of the Perfons pofl(;l]ed of the Currency of the Ifland. Meffieurs Mcriwelher and Manning, whom we appointed our Agents at Jamaicay did refufe to comply with a Demand made on them by Mr Cohbrookc, for the im- mediate Payment of a Sum of Money, and alfo what might be further wanted for the Service of the Expedition, at 120 ; and the Reafon alledged for this Refufal was, Mr CoUbrooke\ abfolute Denial of their Requeft to be informed what Part of the Money brought out by the Deputies, had been iflucd, what Sums were then wanted, and what Sums would be neceflary from time to time to be raifed for carrying on the Service. This Denial of Mr dlcbnoke, and his peremptory Demand withouc Limitation, we conceive mu!t have been calculated to deter our Agents from the Execution of our Orders, and he thereby get tin; Tranfadlion of the whole Affair into his own Hands. As ( 25 ) As foon as we received Notice of what had happened between the Deputies and Meflleurs Mernucthcr and Maimmg, we made an Alteration in our Agency acquainting your Lordftiips therewith, and in the Room of the former appointed Mr John Gray our Agent, who made an immediate Offer of all fuch Sums as were or fliould be wanting for His Majefty's Service, at 125, agreeable to a new Engage- ment we iiad entered into with your Lordfhips. As Mr CoUbrooke could no longer pretend Refufa! on the Part of our Agents, of the Payment of any Sum of Money, which hefhould require, he pleads the Want of Orders, and that our Contract was at an End, notwithftanding Notice was given him of the new one made with your Lordfhips at 125, and under thefe Pretences he refufed to accept of the Offer made him by our Agent, and continues to drawr himfelf on the Pay-mafter-General. The AfTurance that Mr Colebrooke gives to the Pay-mafter-General, that the Ex- change muft be kept up at 140, appears to us mofl extraordinary, as we think nothing in a Nature moie precarious or uncertain, than the Courfe of that Ex- change. The Computations made by Mr Colehroole in his Letter the id Sept. are errone- ous in Part, and extremly fallacious in the whole. Piftoles, inflead of the Price which he mentions o{ 16 s. 8 d. are not to be bought under 17 /. 2 cl. and Moidores of 27 s. not to be found for any large Sum, the Non-Coinage of this Particular Specie for many Years having rendered it very fcarce. The Addition of 6 per Cent. to this Computation for Freight and Infurance from Jamaica to London., is placed direflly contrary to what it ought to be. It is a nec^flary Charge upon the Re- mitter, who fends it from hence, and at whofe Expence it got thither, and by which means alone the Exchange bears any Price at all. His Computation on Silver is equally erroneous; the Price which he mentions to be 5 j. bd. in En- gland, lias been, fince the Commencement of the War with Spain, and will proba- bly remain fo during the Continuance of it, from 5;. j d. to 5 j-. -jhd. for Pieces of Eight, and fo in Proportion for fmall Pieces, wliich upon a Medium of 7 r. 3 d. and y s. 2d. Jamu'tca Currency, forms an Exchange of about 128 \ per Cent. Mr Colebrooke, to complete the whole, ventures, in his Letter September 7, to •write to the Pay-mafter-General, that by his Succefs, His R/Iajefty's Troops had been fupplied 20 to ■^o per Cent, better or cheaper than they would have been by our Agents. In order to give your Lordfhips all the L'gbt in Our Power, we beg leave to lay before you the real State of the following Species mentioned in Mr Cdebrooke's Letter, in refpeiS: to their Price here, their Value in Jamaica, and what the Produce is to the Remitter, after Dedudion of the Charges they pay for the fame, wz. s. d. I. Piftoles at 17 2 each Sterl. pafs in Jamaica at i Jamaica Currency. Guineas at I i Ditto. i Moedas at i 7 Ditto. i Ditto. I 16 Ditto. 2 The Medium of the above Species produce for every 100/. Sterling Jamaica Currency about — — — — — '39^ Dedu(3 there-out the following Charges paid by us on Remittances to Jamaica : £ I per Cent. Shipping and other Charges in England, 2 i per Cent. Infurance. I per Cent, Freight to Jamaica. 3 per Cent. Commiflion we pay in Jamaica, £ "J i per Cent, Computed on 139! the above Medium is about — 105 129 The Price contrafled for now being 100 /. Sterling for 125 Jamaica, de- duct the faid — — .^. — — 125 Then their Remains a Profit, Jamaica Currency, the Sum of 4./. on 139 j not qiike 2 p(r Cent, which we prefume will not be thought by your LorJfliips unrea- fonable, confidering the Truft we are obliged to put in Agents, at that Diftance, and the great Hazard that attends all Tranfaclions in thofe Parts ; to which we muft again repeat, that as the Rife of the Exchange was entirely owing to the G Monef s. d. /. 3 9 is for ICO Sterl. 108 1 8 9 136 i4 18 9 U3i 10 1381 ( 26 ) Money fent only by us, had that Money mifcarried, we muft have felt the Incon- veniency of a want Currency for the Subfiftance of the Troops, and been expofed to the Mercy of thofe Perfons, who were engaged in a Combination to maicc their Advantage of it, and the Profit now made, no way equal to what we muft in that Cafe have fufFered. And this leads us to take Notice of what the Pay-niafter-Ge- neral defires in his Memorial, that your Lordfhips will give Orders, and Diredtiuns, for difpofing of the Profits for Difference by Exchange, on the Bills drawn upon upon him by his Deputy, As we humbly conceive by our Contra£t, with your Lordfhips, we engaged and obliged ourfelves to furnifti the Pay of the Troops, at a certain Rate, and had the before- mentioned Combination taken Effe6f, and the Exchange thereby fallen under that Rate, or the Funds fent out been attended with Lofs, fuch Difference or Lofs muft: neceffarily have been borne by us. There- fore we humbly fubmit it to your Lordftiips, that we are in Equity entituled to the Profit, that fliall arife from fuch Draughts, and that the fame be carried to our Account and paid over to our Agents at 'Jamaica, Peter Burr ell. John Brijiow. Number IX. 5 /ij INclofed is the Affidavit as defined. I fhould be glad to know how the Petition fucceeds for Cofts out of the Juftices Fines. I am exceeding forry for the Death of Mr Lawton. Where to have fuch another for publick Affairs, I am at a Lofs. Sure I am, had he been living and well, our Commiffion of Juftices would have been determined one way or other, e'er this Time. If you have any Intereft, I beg you would profefs it ftrongly. With it, the Corporation is our's j without it, it is hazardous, and will be attained (if ever) with great Difficulty. I beg you'd proceed no farther in any of the Motions you and I have been con- cerned in, than Mr Brooksbank anfwers Payment for both to you, and me, who am. SIR, Your humble Servant, William Daniel, My Clerk was in London, when I firft received your Letter for the Affidavit. Colchejler, Jan. 17, 1740. Number ( 27) Number X. or An ACCOUNT of all Sums ifTued for fecret Service, for His Majefty's immediate or fpecial Service, the Money iffued to His Majcfty's Privy Purfe excepted, or to reimburfe Expences for His Majefty's Service, diftinguiOiing the Caufe aflign'd for iffuing the fame, the Time when, and Perfons to whom, the fame has been iffued, from the i oth Day of February 173 1, to the loth Day of February 174-1, Viz. Sums liTued for His Majefty's fecret Service. Sums iflued for His Majefty's Service,or fpecial Service. Sums iflued to re- imburfe Expences. /. s. d. /. 1. d. /. s. d. 1 0000 2000 600 • 600 — ■ — 739 12 — 75 II — 1228 19 8 497 10 — 285 4 6 112 6 — 199 3961 2700 2000 II 6 6 8 224 12 — 10500 — — 427 2231 17 — 4 6 3000 — — 2000 — — 5000 2000 615 18 4 1200 — — 2IIO II 6 1 1000 — - — 3000 2000 5358 12000 18 6 2016 6 — 743 2000 19 — 5000 3800 4000 I981 4 6 The Time when iffued 5 July 1 739 29Aug. 741 2 7 Mar. [732 2oApr. ^733 5 Aug. 1 [732 15 Jan. ] 732 27June 1 733 1 3 July] 734 3oSept. ] 738 1 5 Dec. ] 73^ 3oSept. ^73^ 23 Dec. iy^6 23Aug. '737 6 Sept. '737 140a. 17411 6 April f7H 7 Feb. 1739 5 Feb. 1740 21 July 1741 4 Jan. 1741 260a:. '737 4 Jan. [741 2 7 Apr. '734 1 7 Jan. iys6 29Apr, '73^ 22 Jan. '738 22 Apr. '734 140a. '741 9 July 739 i4May '737 3oMar. '73^ ifDec. 738 4 Jan. J [741 26 061. '737 12 Jan. ^739 i3May 1740 26June [740 Perfons to whom iffued. Richard Allen Robert Adams, Gent, Thomas Bowen ditto Samuel Buckley ditto ditto ditto ditto John Barnaby ditto William Blair Edward Bryant ditto ). Burton, Efq; William Catton Abraham Caftres George Campbell,Gent. Henry Carleton George Denton John Egerton Francis Edwards Thomas Ford Abraham Farley Will. Frazier, Gent. Andrew Forfter William Farmer W.Frammingham,Efq; Thomas Gibfon John Hall, Efq; Jofeph Hardifty Will. Lord Harrington Rich. Harrifon, Efq-, Robert Jackfon William Johnfon Will. JefFerfon,Efq; Will, Jackfon, Efq; Sums ( 28 ) Sums iflued for His Sums iflued for His Sums iffued to re- The Time when Majefty's fecret Majefty's Service.or imburfe Expences. iffuL-d. Perfons to whom ifTued. Service. fpecial Service. /. s. d. /. s. d. /. S. d. 428 12 — 6 Sept. 1737 Peter Leheup, Efq; 2IIO 13 iiApr, 1739 . ditto 500 iiMar. 1731 Thomas Lowther 1000 22 ditto ditto 1500 29 dit. 1732 ditto 1000 • 20 April ditto lOOO — 15 May ditto 500 26 ditto ditto 1500 8 June ditto 500 I July ditto 1000 27 ditto ditto 500 9 Auguft ditto lOOO ■ 19 ditto ditto 1000 20 Sept. ditto • 1000 — — 1 9 Oftober ditto 1500 6 November ditto 500 1 1 Decemb. ditto 1000 — ■ — 30 ditto ditto 1000 — — 12 January ditto 1000 • 8 February ditto 1000 28 ditto ditto 1000 — — 22 March ditto 1500 17 Ap. 1733 ditto rooo — — 2 June ditto 500 19 ditto ditto 2500 30 ditto ditto 500 • 2 July ditto 1000 14 Auguft ditto 1000 15 ditto ditto 500 11 Sept. ditto 1000 ' 2 Odober ditto 1500 ig ditto ditto 1000 16 Nov. ditto 1000 19 ditto ditto 1000 15 Decemb. ditto I coo — - 4 January ditto 2000 17 ditto ditto 1000 26 ditto ditto 1000 22 Feb. ditto 2000 • 2 6 Mar. 1 734 ditto 2500 - — ' — II April ditto 2000 3 May ditto 2000 13 ditto ditto 1000 — ■ — ID July ditto 2500 18 ditto ditto 500 — • — 7 Auguft ditto 1000 24 Sept. ditto 1000 8 Oflober ditto 1000 — ■ — 25 ditto ditto 1000 6 November ditto 1000 12 Decemb, ditto 1500 — — 4 January ditto 1500 1 7 Feb. ditto 1500 26 ditto ditto Sums Sums ifTued for His I Sums Iffaed for Ilj. Majefly's fecret Majefly's Service, or Service. fpecial SerWce. (29 ) Sums ifmed to re- ; Tiie T'me when 1 imburfe Expences. iffued. /. /. d. Perfons to vvhotn iiuied. /. S. 1000 — 3000 ' — 1500 — 2000 — 1500 — 2500 — 2000 — 1000 — 1000 — 1000 • — ' 1000 — • 2000 — • 1000 — - 1500 — - 1500 ^ . 15CO — - 1500 1000 — - 1500 — - 1500 — - 2000 — ■ - 1000 — _ 1200 — . _ lOOO 1500 1500 2000 2300 2000 1500 1500 2000 — _ 1000 — _ 20Q0 _ 1000 1000 500 — _ 2000 1000 2600 lOOo 1200 — i 1000 1500 — _ 1000 1200 1500 _ 1500 3500 1000 1000 3500 — -_ 2000 . . 1500 H 19 April 16" May 14 June 10 July 20 Aus;. 27 ditto 5 Sept. 26 ditto 20 oa. 7 Nov. 29 Dec. 3 f eb. 5 ditto 4 iVIar. 1735 16 Ap. 1735 5 June 9 ditto 30 ditto I r Aug. 6oa. 10 Nov. 18 Dec. ■ 18 Jan. 19 Feb. 29Mai-. 1737 14 May 9 July 22 Sept. 7 Nov, 3 1 Dec. I Feb. 22 M-ir. 19 Ap. 1738 4 May 10 ditto 22 June 12 July 16 250a 7 Dec. 17 Jan. 24 ditto 3 Feb. 28 ditto 7 ^Pr. 1739 12 May 20 June II July 22 Aug. 5 Sept. 3 Nov. 23 Jan. 15 Feb. Aug. Thomas Lovvther. ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto Sums Sums iffued for His Majefty's fecret Service. /. S. d. (30) Sums iffued for His sums iffued to re- The Time when Majefty's Service.or mburfe Expences. iffued. fpecial Service. /. s. d. /. s. d. 2000 8 March 1000 2 April 1 740 1500 22 ditto 1200 22 May 1500 — — 3 July 1300 — 22 ditto 3110 II 6 29 ditto 2000 — — 23 Auguft. 2000 — — 19 Sept. 1000 6 Novem. 1500 22 Dec. 1000 — — 9 Febuary 1500 — ■ — 28 ditto 1500 13 March 1500 1 5 Apr. 1 741 1500 21 May 1000 • — — 2 July 500 — — 4 ditto 2000 — — 16 ditto 1000 — — 20 Auguft 1500 — • I September 2000 ■ — — 30 Dec. 2000 21 January 2400 2 July 1733 5000 — 3oApr.i734 1675 22Apr.i735 1966 12 2oOa;. 1735 2090 19 — 3 July 1736 2090 19 23 Dec. 1736 2090 19 1 1 May 1737 2090 19 • — 28 Jan. 1737 2090 19 27Ju'yi738 2090 19 3 Feb. 1738 2090 19 ' igMay 1739 2090 19 250^.1739 500 ■ II Aug. 1 735 3030 4Marc. 1736 243 7 June 1 740 5Z^ iS - 3oSept.i735 638 16 6 230^.1736 g6 — 6 19 Jan. 1736 256 15 — 40a. 1738 469 5 Sept. 1 74 1 1000 — ■ — 4 Marc. 1 73 1 . 1500 24Apr. 1732 1000 ■ i7junei732 1000 19 Auguft 1200 — — 4 Oftober 2000 22 January 1000 — — 2 June 1733 1000 • 25 ditto 1200 — — 30 ditto 1000 — — 25 October 1000 20 Novem. Perfonj to whom iffued. Thomas Lowther. ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto George Middleton. ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto William Marfhal. Thomas May. Horatio Mann, Efq; James Payzant. Daniel Prevereau. ditto J. Burnaby Parker, Efqj ditto Nichlas Paxton. ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto ditto Sum.s ( 31 ) Sums iffued for His Majefty's fecret Service. /. s. d. Sums iflued for His Sums iffued to re- The Time when Majefty'sService,or imburfe Expences. iffued. Perfons to whom iffued. fpecial Service. /. S. d. /. 5. d. 1200 4 Jan. Nicholas Paxton. 1000 • 7 Mar. dit. 1000 9 May 1734 dit. 1000 16 July dit. 500 2 oa. dit. 1200 6 Nov. dit. 1000 ■ — • 27 ditto dit. 1500 22 Ap. 1735 dit. 1000 1 7 May dit. 1000 ■ — 10 July dit. 1000 8 Nov. dit. 1000 ■ — 29 Dec. dit. 1500 — — 18 Feb. dit. 1500 II Mar. dit. 1000 . 12 June 1736 dit. 1000 — 17 July dit. 1000 — ' 3 I Aug. dit. 1000 4 061. dit. 1500 — ' . — 3 Nov. dit. 1000 3 Feb. dit. 2000 — — 15 M.ir. dit. 2500 . — — 30 Ap. 1737 dit. 1500 12 July dit. 1500 24 Sept. dit. 1000 6 Dec. dit. 1500 I Feb. dit. 1500 23Junei73S dit. 1500 — . — 1 2 July dit. 1500 40a:. ' dir. 2000 " 26 ditto dit. 1500 • 19 Feb. dit. 1000 4 Mar. dit. 1500 26 May 1739 dit. • 1500 ' II Aug. dit. 1000 26 oa. dit. 1500 — • ■ — ■ II Mar. dit. 1500 30 May 1740 dit. 1500 — — 7 oa-. dit. 1500 13 Dec. dit. 2000 i— — 4 July iJA^l dit. 1000 — — • 18 Aug. dit. 2000 — . — 19 Jan. 1741 dit. 800 8 Mar. 1731 "William Richards. 5000 15 Apr. 1732 dit. 2700 — ■ 5 Aug. dit. 2100 31 oa. dit. 2065 . 22 Feb. dit. 3000 5 May 1733 dit. 2700 . — ■ 1 6 Aug. dit. 15000 28 ditto dit. 2000 • 1 7 Sept. dit. 1000 ■ 21 Nov. dit. 3800 9 Mar. 1733 dit. 3722 _ _- .12 July 1734 1 dit. Sums ( 32 ) Sums ifi'aeJ for His Sums ilTued for His Sums iflued to re- The Time when Majefty's fecret Majefty's Service, or imburfe Expences. iflued. Service. fpecial Service. /. s. d. /. S. d. /. s. d. 300 — — 30 July 1734 1276 10 6 8 January 42S 12 — 13 February 1812 27 dit. 3004 22Apr.i735 6000 19 May 1476 5 J"'y S62 i6 — 7 November 5452 25 Feb, 1 73 1 5810 22 March 4800 — ■ — i9Apr.i732 5990 2 May 6700 • 13 dit. 6800 2 July 667S 28 dit. 5000 16 Auguft 5905 17 dit. 2000 • 16 Sept. 7255 19 0(5tober 1 0000 • 31 dit. 7600 23 Decemb. 1200 19 January 6222 — — 5 February 5160 ■- 2 March 5450 ■ 7 Apr. 1733 4800 5 May 7100 23 dit. 7700 8 June 5400 21 dit. 1 1500 28 dit. 7610 2 Auguft 10000 — — 14 dit. I 0000 22 dit. 5493 19 Sept. 6399 10 Odlober 6876 10 Novem. 6067 22 Decemb. 6000 12 January 6850 19 dit. 7328 19 — 1 1 February 7822 9 March 10300 13 Apr. 1 734 7650 22 dit. 2000 — — 2 May 5250 6 June 6800 12 July 6732 26 Auguft 6000 I ^ Sept. 4518 3 0aober 6621 6 Novem. 6059 * 10 10 Decemb. 5750 5 February 5600 27 dit. 1500 2 6Mar, 1735 Perfons to whom iffiied. William Richards dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. John Scrope, Efq; die. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit, dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. Sums (33 ) Sumsiffiicd for His i Sums ifTued for His Majefty's fecret Majefty's Service, or Service. fpecial Service. 17 — /. S. d. 5300 — ^ 8150 3600 . — 7QOO ■ — 6000 ■ — 7200 — 6500 — ■ 7500 5165 5000 6471 7000 6400 6600 8000 8725 7750 5300 6450 3000 5000 4857 5792 3850 1000 13 4 /. Sums iflued to re- imburfe Expences. /. s. 10 . — — 4390 — — 6320 — . — 8250 7790 6200 — ■ — S050 50CO • 2523 — — 3557 10 4690 17 — 2861 12000 — • — 4560 — — 3941 — — 5-^44 12 — 6950 7250 4300 — — 8000 — — ■ 5800 . 1 1000 ■ 6890 ■ 3200 6000 ■ 8159 16 — 12000 8900 — ■ — • 6620 — — 3220 The Time when iflbed. Perfpns to whom iflued. 2 2 April John Scrope, Efq 12 May dit. 19 dit. dit. 28 June dit. 6 Auguft dit. 16 dit. dit. 30 dit. dit. 30 Septem. dit. 20 October dit. 8 Novemb. dit. 16 Dec. die. 3 January dit. 25 Febuary dit. 29Mar. 1736 dit. 17 April dit. 13 May dit. 27 dit. dit. 3 July dit. 6 Auguft dit. 15 Sept. die. 15 oa. dit. 6 Novemb. dit. 4 Dec. dit. 17 January dit. I Febuary dit. 4 March dit. 9 April 1737 dit. 27 May die. 20 June die. 7 July die. i7Aug.i737 dit. 5 September dit. 30 Dec. dit. 26 Odtober die. 3 Dec. die. 22 dit. die. 7 January die. 1 1 Febuary dit. 8 March diit. 12 Apr. 1738 dit. 10 May dit. 31 dit. dit. 7 July die. 10 Auguft die. 30 Sept. die. 1 3 Oftobcr d'ie. 6 Novembe r die. 2 3Decembe r die. 27 Febuary die. 3 iMar. 1 73( ) die. 2 May dit. 30 May die. 23 June die. 5 July die. Sums Sums iflued for His Majefty's fecret Service ■ /. s. d. 7800 — — 7200 6414 15 5 1195 — — 4250 — — 8700 6600 — — 7850 ■ 8000 — — sees 12 — 6000 . — . — 6000 — — 6000 — • — 6000 — — 6000 . 8000 • 7250 8474 • 7233 16 4 7718 18 10 7300 — — 5000 — ■ — 5000 — — 5000 — • — 5000 ■ — ' — — 5000 — ' — " 5000 — . - — ■ 7994 5 5 8544 — ' — 2000 - - ( 34 ) Sums iffijeJ for Hia Sums iflued to re- Tiie Time when Majefty'sService,or imburfe Expences. iflued. Perfons to whom ilTued, fpecial Service. /. s. d. /. s. d. 9 Aug. John Scrope, Efq; 15 Sept. dit. 23 oa. dit. 24 Nov. dit. 29 Dec. dit. 12 Jan. dit. 4 Mar. dit. 2 8 Apr. 1740 dit. 13 May dit. 5 June dit. 28 dit. dit. 16 Aug. dit. 10 Sept. dit. 130a. dit. 7 Nov. dit. 25 dit. dit. 31 Dec. dit. 24 Jan. dit. 3 Mar. dit. 2oApr. 1 741 dit. 9 May dit. 6 June dit. 8 July dit. 8 Aug. dit. 25 dit. dit. 150ft. dit. I Dec. dit. II Jan. 1 741 dit. 23 dit. dit. 4 Feb. dit. 5000 — 4 May 1732 James Sarkey 4160 — • — 21 June 1733 Francis Smith 2900 ■ — — 9 Jan. 1734 John Shepherd. 1500 lojan. 1735 dit. 2000 — — 21 dit. dit. 2900 — — 4 Feb. dit. 3269 15 7 25 dit. dit. 4000 ■ 7 Apr. 1736 dit. 2820 26 June dit. 2000 1 1 Aug. dit. 2979 18 — 3 Sept. dit. 2900 — ■ — 150ft. dit. 1400 1 7 Dec. dit. 640 • i3Jan. 1736 dit. 2900 3oSept.i737 dit. 3054 29Aug.i738 dit. 5286 7 3 16 Dec. dit. 2000 17 Mar. dit. 2583 16 — 7 June 1 739 dit. 2983 6 — 23 dit. dit. 1321 2 — 3 Oft. dit. 2900 7 Nov. dit. 1900 29 Dec. dit. 1321 3 6 8 Jan. dit. Sums Sums iflued for His Majefty's fecret Service. /. d. Suras ifTued for His Majefty'sService, or fpecial Service. /. S. d. 3600 1322 3 6 1322 3 6 739 6 6 2715 8 lo 1059 7 — 1584 19 — 3600 2350 2900 323 5 — 3112 I 6 3^ SO — 2141 2 2 541 16 8 500 — — — 4150 — 79 iS — 53^ 18 ioooo — 1963 8 8 849 2 — 5000 — — 5058 — 2000 — 1000 — ( 35 ) Sums iffued to re- imburfe Expences. 795 1500 II 389 10 3 533 658 692 131 8 6 6 — 8 6 - 6 500 IOOOO 323 The Time when iflued. Perfons to whom iffued. 9 — i7Mar. 1739 3 April 1740 6 May 22 dit. 8 Auguft 23 February 21 March 4 April 1741 21 May 30 dit. 21 July 4 Jan. 1 74 1 7 dit. 18 dit. 17 Feb. 1738 i9May 1739 ioMar.1740 1 Feb. 1 74 1 2 June 1732 7 July 1733 23 Mar.i 733 3 Jan. 1734 1 2 June 1736 28Apr.i737 21 Jan. 1737 5 Feb, 1739 4 Apr. 1 734 7 July 1737 15 Feb. 1 734 26Aug. 1734 i6Aug. 1735 20 Oft. 1 735 3 Nov. 1735. 4 July 1738 3 Sept. 1 74 1 4 Jan. 1741 John Shepherd dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. John Scrope, Efq. dit. dit. dit. John Shepherd William Sperrin John Smith Arthur Stert, Efq; George Stephens, Efqj Henry Wilfon John WafTe dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. dit. John Williams dit. Jofias Wordfworth Edw, Williamfon Henry Walters Andrew Wilfon, Efq; George Wilkins, Efq; Daniel White Thomas Wilkin, Gent. Charles Watfon, Gent. Memorand' THERE is iflued to the two Principal Secretaries of State, by Privy-Seal, the Sum of Z/. 3000 per Ann. each, payable Quar- terly, for His Majefty's Secret Service. Exchequer, ylpril 19, J 742. J DAWSON. ( 36 ) N UMBER XL An ACCOUNT of all Sums iffued for fecret Service, or for the immediate or fpecial Service of the Crown, the Money iffued for the Privy Purfe excepted, or to reimburfe Expences for the Service of the Crown, diftinguilTiing the Caufe alUgn'd for iffuing the fame, the Time when, and the Perfons to whom the fame has been iffued, from the ift of Atigtiji 1707, to the \^ oi Augujl 1720, Viz. Sums jfTued for fe- Sums iflued for Ser- Sums iflued to re- The Time when cret Service. vice, or fpecial Ser- imburfe Expences. iflued. Perfons to whom iflued. vice. /. S. d. /. S. d. /. s. d. 1339 15 — 1 1 Nov. 1 7 1 3 Daniel Arthur, Efq; 1032 2 6 1 6 Jan. 1713 ditto II35 15 3 April 1714 ditto 1237 5 13 May ditto -^91 13 1 6 June 1 716 Mofes Berenger, Efq-, 300 — -^ 7 Aug. ditto 1500 — 6 July 1717 ditto 546 6 6 16 Nov. ditto 217 8 2 29 Jan. 1717 ditto 500 — — 1 3 March ditto 861 — — 13 Dec. 1 7 16 Samuel Buckley 6000 — — 1 1 Jan. 1 7 1 7 Henry Bendyfh 127 10 — 22 Jan. 1 71 6 George Eubb, Efq; 500 — 19 July 1 708 Henry Baker ' 150 — — 23July 1719 Jac. de la Motte Blagny 500 — — 2 3Sept. 1707 William Borret 500 — — 6 Dec. ditto 400 — — 4 Feb. 1 707 ditto 1000 — ■ — 19 May 1 708 ditto 500 ■ 25 Nov. ditto 5000 7 Jan. 1708 ditto 500 — — 4 May 1709 ditto 500 — — 7 J"'y ditto 500 — 27 Aug. ditto 500 ■ 21 Nov. ditto 200 — — 5 Apr. 1 7 10 ditto 300 10 May ditto 150 14 June ditto 350 ■ 12 July ditto 500 — • — 260a. ditto 500 — — i4Mar. 17 10 ditto 500 28 July 171 1 ditto 500 — — 18 Aug. ditto 500 23 Nov. ditto 250 7 Mar. 1 7 1 1 ditto 250 27Mar.i7i2 ditto 300 19 April ditto Sunis (37) Sums ifiued for fe- Sums ifTued for Ser Sums iffued to re - The Time when cret Service. vice, or fpecial Ser- ;vi.e. imburfe Expences iffued. Perfons to whom ifTued. /. s. d. /. s. d. /. s. d. 200 9 May William Borec. 500 — 2 July dit. 500 31 Od. dit. 500 — - 29 Nov. dit. 500 31 Jan. 1712 dit. 500 6 May 1 7 1 3 dit. 700 14 Aug. dit. 1000 — — 1 1 Nov. dit. 500 I Feb. 1713 dit. 500 26 ditto dit. 500 29AP. 1714 dit. 500 — — 22 June dit. 500 1 Sept. dit. 500 13 ditto dit. 100 1 7 ditto dit. 300 2 Oft. dit. 600 1 1 dit. dit. 2000 12 Nov. dit. 177 7 6 1 6 dit. dit. 1000 6 Dec. dit. 6000 — — 1 7 Feb. 1 7 14 dit. , 1000 5 May 1715 dit. 83 5- i6July 1719 Col. Ralph Congreve. 1500 — — 27Aug.i7i5 William Cadogan,Efq; J 706 10 — 4 May 1 7 1 7 Will. Lord Cadogan. 466 10 — 7 Apr. 1718 dit. 530 4 10 25 May 1 71 7 James Craggs. 16300 25junei7i9 George Clifford, Efqj 27000 2 July 1720 dit. 441 8 6 ioAug.1709 Charles Callmell. 500 — • — i6Junei7i5 Anth. Cratchrode, Efq; 1738 15 4 22 July dit. 500 22 dit. dit. 500 220a. dit. 500 10 Nov. dit. 500 • I Dec. dit. 1500 24 dit. dit. 1000 — • — 18 Feb. dit. 2000 9 Mar. dit. ICOO 1 1 May 1 7 1 6 dit. 2000 7 June dit. 2000 6 July dit. 1000 25 Aug. dit. 2000 24 Sept. dit. 3000 19 Nov. dit. 2000 7 Jan. dit. 4000 ir Feb. dit. , 2500 4 May 1717 dit. 1000 15 June dit. 1000 13 July dit. 2000 8 Aug. dit. 1500 — — 1 7 Dec. dit. 1500 3iMar.i7i8 dit. 1000 • ly May K dit. Sums ( 38) Sums ifTued for fe- Sams iffned for Ser- Sums ilTued to re- The Time when cret Service. vice, or fpecial Ser- vice. imburfe Expences. ifl'ued. Perfons to whom iJTued. /. S. d. /. S. d. /. S. d. 500 10 July Anth, Cratchrode, Efqi . lOOO 9 Aug. dit. 1000 21 ditto dit. lOOO • 24 Sept. dit. 1000 11 Dec. dit. 1000 — — 5 Ja"- dit. 2000 9 March dit. 1000 — • ■ — 25junei7i9 dit. 2000 — ■ — ■ 10 Oft. dit. 800 29 Feb. dit. 500 2 1 May 1720 dit. 500 31 ditto dit. lOOO 4 June dit. 1300 I J Dec. 1711 John Drummond, Efqj 1237 *° 24 Apr 1 71 2 dit, I038 14 May Matthew Decker, Efq; 1038 21 Auguft dit. 389 18 3 30 061. dit. 1038 4 tVb. 1 7 13 dit. 2064 5 — i3M.iyi7i4 dit. 34 28Mar. 1716 George Dumereqiie ICO • 2 1 Mar 1709 Charles Harrifon, Gent. 100 ■ loMay 1 7 10 dit. 200 — • ■ — 19 July dit. 100 10 Sept, dit. 100 3 Jan, 1 7 10 dit. 50 4 Sept. 171 1 dit. 100 19 March dit. 100 — ■ — 31 Jan. 1712 dit. 100 — — ■ 7 Odl, 171 3 dit. 200 1 1 Nov. 1714 dit. 3000 — — 7 Jan. 1715 dit. 1320 1 5 Dec. 1 dit. 500 19 July 1 71 6 William Leathes, Efq; 25^ 17 — 1 1 Apr. 17 1 7 dit. 263 14 6 1 1 June 171 8 dit. 500 2 Aug. J 707 Will. Lowndes, Efq; 1000 — ■ — 3 Sept. dit. 1500 26 ditto dit. 1000 21 Oft. dit. 2000 1 9 Nov 1707 dit. 1657 15 1^ 25 ditto dit. 2161 12 10 27 ditto dit. 1000 — 2 7Mar.i7o8 dit. 500 15 April dit. 1000 — 4 May dit. 1000 12 ditto dit. 1000 • 19 June dit. 1000 6 July dit. lOOO 21 Aug. dit. 500 3 Sept, dit. 500 — 9 ditto dit. 500 16 ditto dit. 500 7 0(fl. dit. Sums ( 39) Sums iflued for fe- Slims iffued for Ser- Sums ilTued to re- The Time when cret Service. vice, or fpecial Ser- vice. imburfe Expences. jffued. Perfons to whom ifTued. /. s. d. /. S. d. /. s. d. 500 140(51.1708 Will. Lowndes, Efqj 500 27 ditto. dit. 500 30 ditto dit. 1000 1 1 Decemb. dit. 1000 • 27 ditto dit. 1000 — — 10 Feb. dit. 1000 22 ditto dit. 2000 — ■ — - I Apr. 1709 dit. 838 7 ih 13 ditto dit. 161 12 lOi 10 May dit. 750 19 ditto dit. 1000 — — 30 June dit. 1000 ■ 13 July dit. 500 3 Auguft dit. 1500 12 ditto dit. 1500 • — • — 3 Sept. dit. 2000 I Oftober dit. 1000 — • — 6 ditto dit. 500 12 Nov. dit. 500 • 3 Decemb. dit. 1000 29 ditto dit. 700 • — • — 22 March dit. 2000 — — 5 Ap. 1710 dit. 2000 — ■ — 3 May dit. 1000 — ■ — 10 ditto dit. 2000 — — 14 June dit. 888 7 ih 21 ditto dit. 1611 12 102 28 ditto dit. 1000 — • — 19 July dit. 500 9 Auguft dit. 1000 9 Sept. dit. 2000 27 ditto dit. 1000 — — 19 Oflober dit. lOOO — ■ — 24 ditto dit. 1000 3 November dit. 4000 — • — ■ 13 Decemb. dit. 1000 10 Jan. 1710 dit. 650 1 7 ditto dit. 1000 — ■ — 3 Feb. dit. 1350 1 5' ditto dit. 1200 7 March dit. 1000 24 ditto dit. 688 7 li 2 6 Apr. 1 71 1 dit. 1000 ■ ditto dit. 2000 • — ■ — V 28 dit. dit. 1000 12 June dit. 1000 — — 30 ditto dit. 3000 — — 4 July dit. 2000 26 ditto dit. 500 18 Auguft dit. 1200 6 Sept. dit. lOOO 13 ditto dit. 1000 20 ditto dit. 1 000 — • — 26 ditto dit. Sums ( 40 ) Sums iffued for fe- Cret Service. Sums iiTued for Ser- sums iflued to re- rhe Time when vice, or fpecial Ser- mburfe Expences. (Tued. Perfons to whom- iflued. vice. /. S. d. /. s. d. /. s. d. lOOO — — II Oaober Will. Lowndes, Efqi lOOO 21 Nov. dit. 2500 ■ 800 24 dit. 4. Decemb. dit. dit. 1200 II dit. dit. 1500 — 1000 15 dit. 24 dit. dit. dit. 1500 ■ — ■ — 1250 17 Jan. 171 1 8 May 1712 dit. dit. 1000 14 dit. dit. 1500 20 dit. dit. dit. 1000 4 June 1000 — • — 18 dit. dit. 1000 — — 25 dit. dit. 1000 ' 9 July dit. 1250 — — 18 dit. dit. 1000 ■ 12 Auguft dit. 500 — — 1500 20 dit. 6 Sept. dit. dit. 1000 25 dit. dit. 1800 ■ 22 Odober dit. 1200 30 dit. dit. 1000 12 Novem. dit. 1000 24 Decemb. dit. 1000 22 January dit. 1650 • — ■ — 12 February dit. 1500 19 dit. dit. 500 — • — ■ 25 dit. dit. 1600 30 Mayi7i3 dit. 2000 — — 10 June dit. 1000 2 July dit. 1000 8 dit. dit. 1000 • 16 dit. dit. 1700 — 1200 • 28 Julyi7i3 dit. 14 Auguft dit. icoo — — • 19 dit. dit. 1000 — . — 29 dit. dit. 650 1000 10 Sept. dit. 16 Odober dit. 2500 — ■ — 1000 12 Novcm. dit. 17 Decemb. dit. 1000 — ■ — 19 dit. dit. 1000 29 dit. dit. 2500 — — 13 January dit. ; 1200 • — — 29 dit. dit. 3500 1 1 March dit. 1500 23 dit. dit. 3000 ( 8 May 1714 dit. 500 13 July dit- 1000 17 dit. dit. 4287 24 dit. dit. lOOCO 20 Auguft dit. 1000 i7Dec. 1715 dit. 5000 — — 10 March dit. ^ Sums :fq-, IS Number. XIII- O Money paid by Mr LciL'ther of the Trealuiy to the following Perfons for printing, publiOiing, and writing of News-Papers, e'c. by 'them delivered at the General PolVOffice in London, between Feb, lo, 1731, and Ftb. 10, 1741, 'viz. tfiiJiaM Arnal, for Frtc Brirnis, and Wriling. 13 April .3 J-^'y 12 Oflober II January ! April ■ July Oflober ) January II April II July 5 Pepwmber n Oflober I I February 1-35 17 May 23 February Jd't ira/ihtt, for printing and pub- IjlTiing Dait} Ceuranti. J38 6 : 730 750 7SS 860 9SJ 9SS ISO Sjo 950 3960 fioo +00 Jvhn H'a/iht, for printing anJ publi/hiog Cc/rCul iiri Journali. 21 Febtuery a 2 ,\Uy zz Auguft 21 Novembrr 10 February 276 19 May aSj 6 8 19 June io3 iS ai Auguft 300 2z November 395 16 8 21 February 614. 10 8 21 May 647 1 2 2 Aogull 693 21 November 710 22 February 738 28 June 99") 30 September 846 13 4 30 Dectmber 853 6 8 |-;j6 30 Match ig June 30 September 30 Detciaber 849 916 13 4. 909 3 4 3601 1737 i° J"' 6 May 13 July 27 Oflober 29 September 15 December 739 25 March 2+ June 2; December 18 February 1000 1000 i5oo 1008 6 8 894 3 4 2 J March 975 Midfummer 975 Michaelmas loz; Chiillmu 970 Touli L. 10997 6 S 394i LaJy Day 2j December 16] 6 8 2; MMch 216 2j June 222 24. September 247 24 December 238 6 8 920 16 8 J,', Jm 4 NJay j Nutcit t.n \'J^hnPa>i. for Mom Wn I pcnded un Dii .M. 276 13 4 ■234 3 4 $60 16 8 9 March 2j8 6 8 /. M.iy 2S9 11 8 3 JJ^cember 363 16 8 (25 March J38 SGaxitluis begun between June and iirpt. 173;. 8193 16 2 J-J Jane 14S6 ! 21 Nuvember :, j..ir 7J5 6t 4460 13 4 (5, 6 8 6 Stplembit 1-50 L. ij;2 10 L. J9!j i6 8 3 January ijo ; November j:i s 8303 6 7i;g II « 36:. 4 . 4370 ' 4 981 ij 4 47657 7 10 1731 38 April, ,734 6 April. ■73! =8 A.8>.ll, '739 3J AuguH, 1740 '7 J"iy. Paia 10 Mr Cot' //«.(.... for I , CO Prrfuat.e. lo In,pa.lii.lil, and Candour in judging of the prcfrni Adniimjlramn S MonCcor 2 Or,//,, tor a Pamphl.t in Viodica.i.n of .h. Mi»i»ry. dcl,.or Orders in his own Name 5 1 . for Orders in Air. Scrape's Name . __ for Orders in the Names of Perfons moflly? unlaiown to the faid Shepherd S John Richards, late a Meffenger to the Treafury, Shepherd's 7 Predeceflbr i Air. Fane, for Orders in A'Ir. Scrape's and Shepherd's Name, -| dated the 8th and 9th of February lafl, which Orders Mr. I Fane pawn'd with the Bank-Officer, at the Exchequer ; | there not being Money in the Hands of the Tellers fuffi- ^ cient to anfwer the faid Orders ; which Money Mr, Fane I. s. d. 78.633 14 z 815,819 5 1 1 19,211 8 4 4S>546 18 6 17,461 carried to the faid Sir Robert JValpole, the faid 9th of February, amountina; to the Sum of -j By Shepherd and other Perfons, which there is likewife great ? Reafon to believe was paid to the faid Sir Robert Walpok 5 The Sum ilTued to Mr. Lowther, one of the Rdeffengers to the ; Treafury, which have been difpofed of by him, under the Diredions of Alinutcs of the Treafury ; viz.. To Authors and Printers of News-Papers , fuch as Free Britons, Daily Courants, Perfuafives to Candour and hn- f- partiality, Corn-Cutters Journals, Gazetteers, and other Pdilical Papers, delivered at the General Poll- Office, amounting to 50,077/. 15 i. and for Bounties, i^c. I27,!;32i. lbs. bd. In bath M 53>6i9 19 7 177,610 II 6 The ( 46 ) The two Secretaries of State for fecret Services, 313000/. ;> , per Annum, each, for 10 Years, is 5 ' The Secretary of the Poft-Office for Decypherers, ^c. 455675 Mr. Middlcton, Banker, in tlie Strand, ^ '^ for Orders made out in his Name, but V- 27,769 4 I on L—-d /---^''s Account 3 ^^ 7o/;« 5/;«^/(w^, for an Order in his Name, p c" 30>"9 4 which he paid into the faid Middlfton^s > 2,350 | on L — d / — y^s Accowit -> j 'John Shepherd, for an Order in his Name, which he paid -^ to Sir Charles IVager, t!ie 2d of "January laft, for John | Lever, High-BailifF of JFcJlminJlcr, as a Reward to a , moft unjuft returning Officer, cenfured by, and a447'736 6 3 Whereas the Sums ifTued under the like Heads, from the ift o^ Augitjl, 1707, to the I'H vii Aiigiift , 1717 ; in wliich Interval of Ten Years, A/l the Circum- Ihmces occurred vvhicli can be urged in JuJi'ijication of the aforefaid Account ; "(fuch as u General War, the Negotiations for a General Peace, Two Total Changes of the Adminiftration, violent Party-Struggles, a Royal Demife, the happ^^Acccffion of the Prefent Royal Family, many popular Commotions, and a Rebellion, amounted to no inore than the Sum of 279,444 /. i i. 7 d. f . So that it appears there has been iflued for SECRET SERVICE, t^c. du- ring the lajl Ten Tears, in which the faid Robert, Earl of Orjord, was Firft Commiffioner of the Treafury, and Chancellor and Under-Treafurer of the Exchequer, more t}m,n in die Ten Years to the ift of Augujl, 1 7 17, notwith- ftanding all the aforefaid Confiderations, the Sum of 1,168,292/. \s. -j d. 4. Such an enormous Sum, fo much exceeding the former Allowances of this Kind, obliged the Committee to make the ftridteft Enquiry imaginable in relation to the Perfons to whom this Money was ifTued ; and as well from the Exami- nation of the faid Perfons, as from the Particulars aforefaid, they found the llrongeft Reafons Co conclude, that great Part of it, amounting to the Sum of 1,076,672/. ()S. ^d. was paid into the Hands of the faid Sir Robert IValpole, or to his Order ; and that with fuch Circumftances as greatly aggravate the Sufpicions which had univerfally prevailed of a Rlifapplication of the Civil-Lift- Revenues, to the Deftruftion of the Conftitution, inftead of maintaining the Honour and Dignity of the Crown. T II E (47) THE PROTEST, Relating to Major-General Anstruther. Die Jovis 28 January, 1741. THE Order of the Day being read, refumhig the adjounid Debate, which arofe Te/ierday, upon a Motion then tnade in the Words following, (viz ) ^' A S 'f appears to this Houfe, by the Lift of the Officers belonging to the •^ " Y.i\-i.h\\ihmtnt oi Minorca ; Tiiat out of Nineteen Offiers, only one Adjutant, one of the joint Secretaries, the Provoft Marflial, and one Sur- geon's Mate, and the Signal Man, are attending their Duty in the Ifland ; it is the Opinion of this Houfe, that the permitting fo many Officers to be abfent in Time of profound Peace, would be a great Negleft of the publick Service, tending to tiie Deftruftion of military Difcipline ; but that the fufFering them to be abfent in Time of War, at ajunfture, when the Ifland of Minorca has been threaten'd with an Invafion from the Spaniards, renders the Polleffion of that important Place precarious, and is highly injurious to the Honour and Intereft of thefe Kingdoms." And alfo, ^' A Motion for the Attendance of Major General Anjiruther ; who attending " accordingly wascall'd in, and having been fvvorn, the Lift of the Officers " belonging to the Eltablifliment of jMwori-fl, laid before this Houfe the 20th " Lrftant, diftinguiihing which of them are upon the Place, and which of " them are abfent, was fhewn to hi;n, and he was directed to give an Ac- " count of the Perfons abfent, the Nature of their Offices and Employ- " ments, and the Reafons of their being fo abfent ; and having given an Ac- " count thereof, was examined further in general as to the State and Con- " dition of the faid Jfland, the Number and Condition of the Forces tirere, " the Manner and Method of Recruiting, and other Matters ;" And then he ivas dircSled to withdraiv, and the foregoing Motion made Yejlerday being infifted on. After Debate, The Queftion was put thereupon, and it was refolv'd in the Negative. Contents • 57 Not Contents . 69 Dijfentient. I. OECAUSE We conceive. That as the Faft ftated in the former Part •L* of the Qiieftion, appear'd plainly from the Paper laid before this Houfe by the proper Ofncer, and neither was nor could be controverted by any one Lord. The Cenfure contain'd in the latter P..rt of the Qiieftion was not only ?/ ( 48 ) Juft, but as Gentle as Co eviJeiit a Neg!c6t of (o imp iit.-iit a Pl.icc, at L> cri- tical a Time, could poffihly allow. The principal, it not the only, Argument made uTe of by tiiofe Lords who oppofed the Motion was, That the Cenfure was general, and pointed at no particular Ferfons, which we rather apprehend to be a Proof of the Judice and Moderation cf that Cenfure, as it could then only liiiht upon the Guilty whoever they were } and we arc inclin'd to believe, tiiat had the Cenfure been applied to ;.ny particular Perfons, the contrary Argu- ment would have been urs^ed, and the Injuflice cf a particular Cenfure, with- out Proofs, founded high, tho' puffibly, at the fame time, the neccfiary Means of setting at thofe Proofs might have been render'd difHcult ; That out of Nine- teen Officers paid upon the Eftablifliment of Minorca, Fourteen were abfent, amono^ whom were the Governor, the Deputy-Governor, and the Governor of Fort St. Philip, was a Fad difputed by none, tho' the flighteli: Cenfure of it was oppofeJ by the Majority of the Houfe. We therefore hope, that Pofterity, to whom We thus Appeal, will not only approve of our Conduit in this Mo- tion, but will likewife, from the ill Succefs of it, find Realons to excufe our not attempting many others of the like Nature. 2. Becaufe, when we confider the tender Apprehenfions of the Admlniftra- tion for the Ifland of Minorca in the Year 1740, when, upon Information receiv'd, that a few Troops were marching to the Coaifs of Catalonia, and a few Tartanes afl'embled in the Port oi Barcelona, Orders (pofllbly obfcure from tliat Precipitation which the Emergency rcquir'd) were fent to our Admirals in the Medittrranca/i to provide imn-.ediatcly for the Defence of that Ifland, even hy going there with their ivhok Force if nccejj'ary. By tile Execution or Miibke of which Orders, the Spanijh Squadron was fufi'er'd to fail from Cadiz to xheJVeJl- hdies, to the imminent Danger of our Fleets and PoUefTions there. We cannot well account for that profound Security in which the Adminiflration fcem'd to be the laft Year, with regard to that valuable PoirelTion, when an Embarkation of fourteen or fifteen thoufand Men, and above two hundred Tranfport-iliips was publickly preparing at Barcelona, and confeqaently withni four and twenty Hours Sail oi Minorca, which Embarkation foon after went undillurb'd to Italy : But we fear this inconfiftent Ccnduft may give too much Credit to Inimuations lately fcatter'd in the Publick, that the Britijh Minilters were as fecure that Minorca would not be attack'd bv the Spaniards, as the Spanijh 'Miniilers were that their Embarkation would fail to Italy unJii^urb'd by our Squadrons in the Mediterranean. 3. Becaufe it appears. That about the fame Time that Major General An- Jlruther left that Ifland, by Leave from the Secretary at War, which was on the 15th of February laii:, Admiral Haddock informs the Secretary of State, in a Letter of the loth of the fame Month, that by the lateft Letters from Mr. Conful Births, he mentions, " That a Spanifh Embarkation is aHually in- " tended, c^nd tho' the firjl Defign was on a fudden dropped, the lajl Intelligence " declares the fame to be renewed again ; " which Information, we conceive, was fuiTicient to have excited greater Apprehenfions for the Danger of tliat Illand, than feem to have been entertained, lince no one Step appears to have been taken thereiipcn for its Defence, or any Leave of Abfcnce recall'd ; but the v.'hole Government was fufFer'd to devolve to a Lieutenant Colonel of one of the Regiments there. 4. Becaufe it appear'd, by the Examination of Major General Anflruther at the Bar, that when he \iii\. Minorca, about the 15th oi February lail, above feven hundred Men were wanting to complete tiie Regiments tliere, and near the fame Proportion of OfHcers abfent : That the pTi\ate Soldiers were lb uneafy at having been there (0 long, that many deflroy'd theinfelves from Dc- fpair, and many maim'd themfelves to get difchargevl. That fliould the Illand be attack'd, the Inhabitants would, in his Opinion, certainly join the Spaniards : That, in his 0;)inion too, t'l.it Illand was always in Danger when our Kaeaiits wee: fuperior in the Mediterramaii, which has bjc.i f..r fome Tune, and is il;il (49 ) h\\\ the Cafe. All which Circumftances concur to prove the Dano-er, the Neg- lect, and the Juftice of cenfuring fuch Negledl at fuch a Time. 5. Becaufe it v/as faid in the Debate by thofe whofe high Stations bed: -enable them -to know, That a general Relaxation of Government, and Ahufes of this "Nature, luere the Vices of the prefent Age. A melancholy Truth ! which We conceive is fo far from being an Argument for Impunity, that it evinces the NeccfTity, at leaft, of cenfuring fuch as We can attain to the Knowledge and Proofs of. And indeed We have but too much Reafon to believe, that the feveral Abufcs committed in the feveral Branches of the Government, un- punifh'd at leaft, if not conniv'd at, have already produc'd Eft'c:(Ss too fenfibly felt by this Nation ; which Abufcs, from the Nature of Things, neceffarily multiply themfelves, and if not fpeedily check'd, muft foon forge a Chain of reciprocal and criminal Dependancy, too ffrong for even the Authority of this Houfe to break, too heavy for the Conflitution to bear. 6. Becaufe the Motion for an Addrefs ofFer'd in Lieu of this Queflion, in •which the fame Fatt is ftated in its full Extent, but without the leafl Cenfure annex'd to it, is, in our Opinions, not only unprecedented, but inconliflent with the Honour and Dignity of this Houfe, as it may feem calculated to fcreen the Guilt it avows ; and as it may be thought to intimate future Impunity for publick Crimes, if ballanc'd by private minjfterial Merit. Artifice may elude Enquiries, or prevent Detection ; Lenity may cenfure a Crime, yet fpare the Criminal ; but Mankind, we fear, may be at a Lofs to account from what Motives fo criminal a Neglc 1 roxies — — 17 •^ ' DiJJenttenf. MACCLESFIELD. I. TlECAUSE the Rejecting of this Bill, founded, as we conceive, upon D Reafon and Jullice, warranted by Precedents, authorifed by Neceflity, and call'd for by the e;eneral Voice of the Nation, may appear a manifcil: Ob- flrutlion to publick Juii:ice, in the prefent great and important Cafe, and a molt certain Deleat of it for the future, in all Cafes of the like Nature. 2. Becaufe it is an uncontroverted Maxim of the Law of England, That the Publick has a Right to every Man's Evidence, and vet, by the fame Law, no Mar is obliced to accufe himfelf ; and as the Accomplices of Guilt are frequent- Iv the only Witnefles of it, v/e conceive, that both Prudence and Juftice point out this -Method c.f Impunity to feme, as abfolutely necelTary towards difcovering the Guilt of others, and thereby diiTob.ing thofe Confederacies, which, formed by common Guilt, can only fubhlt while they are cemented by common Danger. From thefe undeniable Principles we apprehend this Bill ought to have paiTed, in order to preferve the Rights of the Publick, and the Rights of the Individuals. 3. Becaufe this Bill is juftified by many Bills of a much flronger Nature, in Cafes of much Icis Conlequence to the Publick, fuch as the Cafes of Sir Thomas Cooke, the Mafters in Chancery, Sir Robert Sutton, Tljompjon, and others, in fome of which, the Perfons indemnified, in order to give their Evidence, were, at the lame time, compelled, under fevere Penalties, to give it. And as there is a Power not only of Indemnifying, but Revi^arding, necelTarily lodged in the Crown, in order to bring Crimmals to Juftice, by Evidence known to, and within the Reach of the Laws ; fo we apprehend, that in an Inquiry after Crimes, that .may affe£l the Being of the VV hole, the People hax'e a Right to the Exertion of that Power with which the Legiflature is undoubtedlv vefted, to come at fuch Evidence as make that Enquiry effciiUial to their future Security. 4. Becaufe the Legiflature has e:cercifed this Power in many Inftances, re- ■ iating to paiticular Branches of the Revenue, in. order to prevent Frauds, the Per- fons concerned in fuch Frauds are not only mdemnified, but rewarded alfo ; and for the private Utility of one Company, the Legiflature, by the gth of George the Firit, after forbidding any Perion to be concerned in promoting an Ea/{- India Company in the Aujtrian Netherlands, gives to our Ei'.ft-India Comp-iny a Power to profecute, by Bill in Chancery, or Court of Exclitqucr, any Perfon whom they fhall fufpecT:, obliging fuch Periijn to make Diicoverv upon Oath, tho' fuch Difcovery fubjedls him to a Forfeiture. As alfo for the better Dif- coVery of Felonies the Legiflature has thought fit by an Act, 5th of Anne, to pardon any Perfon not only of the Felony diicovcred, but of all other Felonies he has ever been guilty of, upon his making a Difcovery of two Perions who ihall thereupon be convicted of any Burglary or PVlony, and that Dilcoverer is alfo intitled to a Reward. >. Becaufe ( 52 ) 5- Becaufe the rejcfling this Bill may prove a dangerous Prefidcnt of" fatal Coiifcquence to this Coii(l-itution, fince, whenever this Nation fhall be vifitcJ by a ivicked Minijier, thofe who (hall have fcrved him in defr.uuiingaiid opprd- iing the Pubiick, and in corrupting Individuals, will be furiiifiicd with an Ex- cufe (or ref'ufing their Evidence, their Danger will produce his Security, and he may enjoy wjtii Safety the Plunder of his Country ; nay, we even apprehend, that the rcjeding of this Bill may be mifunderffood by thofe who can riiake any Difcovery, as if this Houfe dehgned to difcourage any Evidence whatfoever, that could afJett the Perfon whofe Condudt the Secret Committee was appoint- ed, by the Houfe of Commons, to inquire into. A Minifter may be rerrioved from his Place, and not from his Power ; he may be removed from both, and not fr«m the Favour of his Pi ince ; nay, he may be deprived of all three, and yet his Succtllbr may think his Interefl and future Safety, and his P/ince may imagine his Autliority concerned in prott 2nd on the 3111 of December, I74i' } EXCHEQ^UER. ANnuities for long Terms, being the Remainder of the orignall Sum contributed and unfublcribedi to the South-Sea Company. Annuities for Lives with Benefit of Survivorfhip, being the original Sum contributed. Annuities for two and three Lives, being the Sum remaining after what is fallen in by Deaths Annuities at 9 fer Cent, for ftiort^ Terms j* Annuities on the Lottery ^ano 1710 ) for i/ii/o *y Annuities on the Plate Afl, 6 GcorgH / \. Regis \ Annuities for AW/; and St Chrijlo- ) pber's Debtntures, at 3 fer Cent fer Annum Annuities at 3 /. 10 s per Cent. Anno'/ ■73' S Annuities at 3 fer Cent. Anno 1736, > charged on the Sinking Fund ^ Annuities at 3 per Cent. Anno 1738, i chaiged on ditto < Duties on Salt continued Anno I734 D/V/o further continued Anno 1735 Ditto further continued Anno 1741 Exchequer Bills made out for InteO rell of old Bills exchanged ^ Exchequer Bills on the Viduallers^ Aft Anno 1726 •^ Exchequer BiUs charged on the Du-T ties on Sweets, Anno ly^,"/ J Note, Tie Land-Taxes and the Du- ties on Malt, being Anuual Grants, are not charged in this Account, nor the 100,000 /. charged upon the Deduilions «/" 6 d fer Pound on Penjions, (s'c. EAST-INDIA COMPANY. By two Afls of Parliament, 9 H'il/. Ill, and two other Ads 6 and g ' Anna- Regin^ BANK«/ENGLAND. ' By their original Fund at 6 per Cent.', per Annum < For cancelling Exchequer Bills, 3", Geo. I Regis < Purchafed of the South Sea Company Annuities at 4 per Cent, charged on the Duties on Ccals, ijc. fince ' Lady Day yy^g Ditto charged on the Surplus of the , Funds lor the Lottery i 7 • 4. < Ditto at 3 per Cent for the Lottery , . ^niio I 7 3 1 . ^ SOUTH-SEA C O NT P A N y On their Capital Stock and Annuities 9 G;o. I, P.egis Amount of theiVa- tional Debt on the 3 ill o( De eember, i 740. 1836275 17 10 108100 109447 8 2 i6uo8 6 8 109290 3 1 2000 37S2' 5 1 400000 600000 300000 84500 500000 2200 481400 499600 3200000 1600000 500000 4000000 Increas'd between the 31 II of Dec. I 740, and the 31ft of Dec. 1741. Paid off within what Time. S 00 I 1200000 84500 102500 1 Sooooo 27302203 5 6 Amount of the National Debt on the 31ft of December 1741. 1836275 17 10 108100 108647 8 2 161108 6 S 109290 312000 37821 s I 400000 600000 ] 300000 397500 1200000 2200 481400 499600 3200000 1630000 500000 4000000 1750000 1250000 800000 27302203 5 6 45943946 3 5 1200000 187800 46956246 3 5 TH E Exche- quer to Ca(hi on the Sinking^ Fund, on the 3 ilt\ oi Dec. I 740. To the Produce of the Sink. Fund between the 3irt( of December 1 7 40, and the 3 1 It ol December 1741. Surplus of the. General Fund Z^;//oofthe Ag-7 _ gregate Fund \ ^ Ditto of the ) South - Sea Com- V 99802 pany's Fund 3 Dr 18563; ■^361487 54247 16 4 19 6( .1165538 7 13 I 42 13 I £ '35i'73 '5 3 9000 1 0000 Per Contra Cr. I- '■ nb:r, 1740, and and the 3111 oi Duember, 1741 Jnfullof^ i?o,ooo granted for ^ ^0836 14 4 the Service of the Year 1740 ^^ In fu!l of j^ 1,200,000 granted ^ lall Scilian of Parliament for j> icoooco the Service of the Year 1741. \ To pay the Annuities at 3 per~y Cent, on ^600,000 granted^ 18000 ^tino 1736, for one Year due^ at Michaelmas 174 1 J To the Ufher of the Receipt of \ the Exchequer, for Necefla-^ ries deliver'd for the Service^ ofthefaid Annuities j To pay the Annuities at 3 per \ Cent on jT JOO.OOO granted^ Jnm 173b, for one Year due?" at Michaelmas 1741 j To the Bank oi Enrland for In-^ tereft of ^^ 500, 000 lent by 1 them on tne Credit of the Du- ties on Salt continued Anno '" 1735, for fix Months Interell I due the 8th o( March, 1740 -> To the f-id Bank of England to > make good the Premiums or Rewards for circulating Ex- chequer Bills charged on the "s, 1Q018 4 11 Duties on Vifluallers granted ^ ^ ^ Anno 1726, between the 24th I ■ of Jutj, 1739. and Michael ' mas, 1741 To the fiid Bank of England,^ to make good the Premiums I or Reward.-., fur circulating | Exchequer Bills charged on y 2785O I 4' the Duties on Sweets, granted 1 Anno 1737, between the 24th I of July, 1739, and Michael-^ mas, 1741 To make good the Deficiency ~^ of the Lottery Annuities ^^««oV 4048 147 I 73 1, at Chrifimas, 1740. J To pay Interell on the Loans charged on the Duties on S ilt/ continued .^««o 1741, for fix^ 21000 Months Intereft due the 5th' ofi\W. 1741. To make good the Deficiency of ) Annuities on the Plate Art to C • 1984 13 z Ladj day, 1741 3 -^— ^1190781 7 4 Ballance in Cafh the 31ft of De- cember, 1741 160392 13 II jC'35"73 'S 3 F INI S. ':^^3 D 000 010 315