fi^^l ^ 1 A = ^=c:: AS c/: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^HHRnMT^^^ ^^H ^ ^^^^^^^^^HmMl. = = 4 — == 8 8 ■ li!! ill U[iiHIi)lil!i yiiiiai:*iii«tiiMiiifyiii^t ittn 1 11 ' ANTHONY ASTON STROLLER AND ADVENTURER To which is appended Aston's Brief Supplement to Colley Gibber's Lives; and A Sketch of the Life of Anthony Aston, written by Himself. By WATSON NICHOLSON, Ph. D. Author of "The Stru^^le for a Free Sta^e in London," "Six Lectures on American Liter- ature," "Sources of Defoe's /ournaZ of the Plague Year," etc.^ 19 2 Published by the Author South Haven, Michigan Copyright 1920 BY WATSON NICHOI-SON All Rights Reserved .'. « « • '» .', '' , I t t C i t • . • • • • • • • • • • • •• ••• • • « • « * * • • • 4 • • « 4 « 1 ••• « « ,*• • • • 4 * 4*4 4 t 4* •4 4 4 4 « « t « « 4 *. 4 4 « » * C t ( c «. t s- Q 0) ) \^5\\^ FOREWORD Writing twelve years after Milton's death, in hires of flic Most Famous English Poets, old Winstanley, the royalist, disposed of the author of Paradise Lost in exactly eighty-two words. Shakespeare, escaping the political odium en- veloping the blind poet, came off a trifle better. Other early biographers of the English Stage and Drama disclosed similar exaggerations and eccentricities; but when we find, later, one of them devoting twice as much space to Tony Aston as to Shakespeare and Milton combined, we are aware that proportion and perspective are wanting, or that there was a woful lack of material and judgment. However, when the editors of the latest edition of the Dictionary of National Biography reserve a niche for the effigy of Anthony Aston, we do not feel called upon for an apology for this brochure. 'i'his sketch of Astnn's h'fc is brief, but — Ther n'as naniorc to telle. Short as the account is, the details contained in the following pages represent nil that is 369461 ANTHONY ASTUN known about the once famous wag, and are now published for the first time since Aston's death. In addition to the Sketch, the discovery of which is herein recorded and the document itself printed in full, it has been thought opportune to reprint the Brief Supplement and also Chet- wood's account of Aston; thus collecting in one place all that is known of and about Tony Aston. W.N. "Deer Lodge" South Haven, Michigan, July 4, 1920. ANTHONY ASTON: STROLLER AND ADVENTURER The name of Tony Aston has been familiar to all men of letters, particularly to students of the Stage, for two centuries; and yet, so few real facts have been discovered, hitherto, concerning the man's life that we may assert with- out fear of contradiction, that practically nothing has been known about him, save that he was a strolling player for manv years, the author of an unsuccessful play and the much more important Brief Supplement to Colley Gibber's Apology. Chetwood's General History of the Stage (1749) has been, until now, the sole source of our knowledjj-e about Anthony Aston. This is the only reference mentioned by Baker in his sketch of Aston in Biographia Drrua.ry 22. 1717. 33 ANTHONY ASTON the Sketch that Ireland and Scotland were in- cluded in his itinerary, his condition "sometimes increasing, sometimes decreasing in Circum- stances, Hopes, Friends, Patience — and still have liv'd handsomely by God's Providence — Force of my undaunted Genius", we know little or nothing of the details of his life for some years following his adventure in London. It is worthy of record that Tony, while abhorring and lamenting the illiberal treatment bestowed upon him by the patentees in London, applied the same tactics to his competitors en route. Chetwood, a contemporary of Aston's, thus illumines his monopolistic methods: "He pretended a Right to every Town he en- tered, and if a Company came to any Place where he exhibited his Compositions, he would use all his Art to evacuate the Place of these Interlopers, as he called them. ... If he met with a sightly house, when he was Itinerant, he would soon find the Name, Title, and Cir- cumstances of the Family, curry them over with his humorous verse, and by this means get some- thing to bear his Charges to the next Station. ... If Tony by chance ever came to a Town where a Company of Showmen (as People call them) had got in before him, he presently de- clar'd War with them; and his general Condi- 34 AXTHOXY ASTON tions of Peace were, that they should act a Play for his Benefit, that he might leave the Seige, and march with his small Troop to some other Place. And as he was a Person of Humour, and a proper Assurance, he generally, like a Cat, skimm'd ofif the fat Cream, and left the lean Milk to those that stay'd behind." Tony was simply shrewder, not meaner, than the others, or, as Chetwood doggerelizes It: // various Dealers the same Goods exhibit, They wish each other dangling on a Gibbet. The same historian relates the story of the trunk full of "cabbage-stocks, bricks and stones" left by Tony with a certain landlord, as security for an unpaid board bill. To his credit, be it re- corded, as soon as his circumstances permitted, he returned and redeemed the pawn; for, "his Finances, like those of Kingdoms, were some- times at the Tide of Flood, and often at low Ebb". Scholars acquainted with the evolution of the theatre in England will recall that the first third of the 18th century was a critical period in the history of the Stage. In the first place, there was a determined effort to bring under the con- trol of the Crown (through the Lord Chamber- lain's office) all theatrical amusements through- out the kingdom; while at the same time, the 35 ANTHONY ASTON patentees of the two national theatres, claiming under the patents issued by Charles II to Killi- crrew and Davenant an absolute monopoly of stage performances in London, stubbornly de- fended their sinecures against royal encroach- ments, on the one hand, and on the other they were jealously alert to stamp out all competi- tion of every nature whatsoever. These contests culminated in the famous Licensing Act of 1737, rightly regarded as the most illiberal legislation ever enacted in connection with the acted drama in England. As the precursor of this Act, Sir John Barnard in 1735 introduced into Parlia- ment the Playhouse Bill, aimed ostensibly at a new theatre in the East End (the Goodman's Fields Theatre) erected by Thomas Odell to- ward the close of 1729. The real purpose of Barnard's measure was to clinch the monopoly of the Drury Lane and Covent Garden Theatres, and to bring under the control of the Lord Chamberlain "all common players of Inter- ludes" within the realm. Of course the bill met with stiff opposition; the term "interlude" was all-inclusive, taking in Jarley waxworks, Aston Medleys, and what not? Among others, was a "Petition of Anthony Aston, Comedian", read in the House of Commons April 14, 173.^. The petitioner conceived that he would be ruined if 36 AXTHOXy ASTOX the proposed act passed into law, and prayed that he might be heard personally, "he being poor, and having no Money to fee Counsel". This request was granted; and one wonders which it was, the desire to be entertained, or the love of justice, that moved the committee to grant Tony's plea. The speech was printed by its author, and shows the acumen and egotism of th-: man. He shrewdly saw the threatened danger to his profession in the Playhouse Bill: it would give to the magistrates "the whip-hand of us all, except the Patentees", who would still remain immune within the stronghold of their royal patents. Tony then launched upon one of his characteristic boasts: he was "esteem'd through the Kingdom as a Top Proficient, . . . and am now (without Gaul to any Actor) willing to contend from the Ghost in JIamlet, to Hob in the Country JVake", a fair cFK)u,<.>h challenge it would seem. He declared that his .Medley was a paragon of decency and good manners, "and hath been admitted and applauded . . . when and where common Players have been re- jected ; nay, I have been invited often into the Private Apartments of the Heads of Colleges, and Noble, and Cientlemen's Houses; so that if it had not been ff)r accumulated Misfortunes,] had been in easy Circumstances". He closed his ad- 369461 ANTHONY ASTON dress with the request that he be given a monop- oly of the Medley business in Great Britain, ''or be otherwise provided for, that I may not starve in my declining Years". There were numerous similar attacks on Barnard's proposed measure, and these were so successful that the bill was withdrawn on April 30, 1735. Tony's allusion to "accumulated mis- fortunes" had something to it more than the con- ventional hard-luck story. In addition to the harsh treatment at the hands of the patentees, complained of, at one time during his career Tony was afflicted with consumption, against which he seems to have put up a winning fight. At another period, the date of which I have been unable to fix definitely, he invested in a public house in Portsmouth. The money which he put into this venture must have been the in- heritance he received at the death of his father; for it is inconceivable that he ever should have accumulated a sufficiency of his own earnings to invest in any substantial business. Sometime prior to this diversion, it is possible that he was mitiated into the tapster's calling by Richard Estcourt, the actor, who at one time seems to have owned the Bumper Tavern in James St., Covent Garden. This conclusion is deduced from an advertisement in the Spectator No. 262 38 ANTHONY ASTON (January 1, 1712), in which a Mr. Estcourt recommends his "neat natural wines" to the pub- lic who will be served "with the utmost Fidelity by his old Servant Trusty Anthony, who has so often adorned both the Theaters in England and Ireland". If this be our Tony (and the allusion to his acting is justifiable grounds for suspecting that it is), it was his first service under the sign of a bunch of grapes, as the commendation (which carries also another sign of the times) says of him that, "as he is a person altogether unknowing to the Wine Trade it cannot be doubted but that he will deliver the Wine in the same natural Purity that he received it from the Merchants". The reference by Estcourt to his "old Servant Trusty Anthony", is a little mysti- fying. Aston makes but a single passing allusion to Estcourt in his Supplement; if the relation- ship between the two had ever been as close as that indicated in the advertisement quoted, it would seem that Tony would have made some direct reference to it. However, there is no doubting that Aston kept an "ele«jfant" tavern at Portsmouth, if \vc- may believe his own state- ment to that effect in the recentlv discovered Sketch. He appeared to like the Blue Flag as he called it, "where I was generously used by the worthy Corporation, Officers, and others, 39 ANTHONY ASTON and there might have continued, had some of my Family proved Honest". With this remark he drops the subject as suddenly as he intro- duces it. IV. Aside from the activities recounted in the foregoing outline, there is left to record the out- put of Tony Aston's pen. Here, again, the per- ennial characteristic of the man crops out: there is more of boast and promise than real achieve- ment. The verses scribbled during his school- days have not been preserved, save the half dozen couplets quoted near the beginning of this sketch ; but from these we may judge of the rest, as the man himself changed little from boyhood to old age. Indeed, if there is any marked dif- ference between his early effort and later com- positions, the balance tips in favor of the former. Not many of Aston's "plays" are extant. Baker {Biogrnphia Dramatica) , quoting Chet- wood, says that Tony wrote a piece called Love in a Hurry which was acted without success at the Smock-Alley Theatre in Dublin in 1709. Chetwood mentions no date in connection with this dramatic effort, and, so far as I know, Chet- wood is the sole authority for its existence. But there is no reason for doubting that the play was written and acted, for, as already pointed out, 40 AXTHOXY ASTOX Chetwood has been, until now, our only author- ity on Anthony Aston. It is probable that the piece had its title changed when it was printed, if it ever was printed, or, what is more probable, Love in a Hurry was the sub-title and was omitted from the printed edition. This I con- jecture from the fact that Aston did have a play printed in Dublin in 1709, bearing the title, "The Coy Shepherdess, a Pastoral, as it was Acted at the Theatre Royal." In 1712 this was reprinted in London with the followinfy title- page: Pastora: / or, th? / Coy Shepherdess. / An / Opera. / As it was Perform'd / By His Grace the Duke of / Richmond's Servants / At / Tunbridge-Wells / In the Year 1712. / Writ- ten by / Anthony Aston, Comedian. This piece is slight from every approach, and is beneath, criticism. It could not, in and of itself possibly have furnished more than a twenty minutes en- tertainment, without the addition of stage "busi- ness" for the real "show". It is difficult to con- ceive why it was called an "opera", or how it possibly could have formed the basis of amuse- ment of any sort in any age. But then wc have our own comic operas to answer for. Much later than The Coy Shepherdess ap- peared The Fool's Opera. I have placed this conjecturely in the year 1730, although it is pos- 41 ANTHONY ASTON sible that it appeared later than that date. Gay's Beggar 5 Opera was acted early in 1728, and as it was widely imitated it is possible that it fur- nished Aston with the suggestion, although the chief resemblance is in the titles. The full title of Tony's book is, The / Fool's Opera; / or, the / Taste of the Age. / Written by Mat. Med- ley. / And Perform'd by / His Company in Oxford. / To which is prefix'd / A / Sketch / of the / Author's life, / Written by Himself. / This is a very rare book, not on account of the intrinsic worth of the "opera", but because of the "Sketch" (which is suffixed, not prefixed as stated on the title-page). The British Museum probably possesses the only copy in existence. It is the only authoritative account of the life of Anthony Aston thus far unearthed, and its exist- ence was not suspected until I discovered it a few years ago. It has been largely drawn upon for the foregoing pages, and is of such singular importance as to justify a reprinting at this time. Its general characteristics are the same as those of tht Brief Supplement {which, is also reprinted in this volume), although more ragged in style, and less coherent and more crude in every way. The two pamphlets are alike in the vulgar tone which dominates them both, and in the egotism of the author. The two documents were appar- 42 ANTHONY ASTON cntly set up and printed on the same press. A "To the Reader", prefixed to the Fool's Opera, informs us that it "was first Acted with univer- sal Satisfaction in a Person of Quality's House, by People of the first Rank, for their own Diver- sion; who, I must needs say, did all the Char- acters Justice, especially the Fool, who out-acted himself. The "Person of Quality" is not des- ignated, but the "People of the first Rank" are set down as, Poet Mr. Aston Sen. Fool Mr. Aston, Jun. Lady Mrs. Motteux Maid Mrs. Smith The preface closes with this whimsy: "N. B. I hereby Own to have Received for the Copy of this OPERA One Thousand Three Hundred Forty Four Pounds, Nineteen Shilling and Eleven Pence Three Farthings, — All in Mr. Wood's Half-pence." Inset at the top of the frontispiece is a medallion efiigy, labelled "Tony Aston," but, although a rarity, its likeness to the original may be doubted. In passing, it is of interest to note that Aston's company was not confined to his own small fam- ily, as hitherto generally supposed. In addition U) the Mrs. Smith and the Mrs. Motteux men- tioned in the above cast of characters, four other 43 ANTHONY ASTON names appear in Tony's company at other times. These were Champneys and Leigh, Mrs. Dumene and Mrs. Lee. These names appear among the dramatis personae of the Coy Shep- herdess, and were probably the "additional com- pany" mentioned in the advertisements of 1717. The play which Tony says he wrote in South Carolina "on the Subject of the Country", as well as the poetry written in New York the fol- lowing Winter, probably never got printed. This may also be stated of the many songs, pro- logues, and epilogues which he composed to "fill up the chinks of the slender meal" served up in his Medleys. Some of these, doubtless, were never as much as written down, but were simply improvisations out of Tony's surplus audacity and waggery. However, belles-lettres have not suffered for the omission, if the extant samples of Tony's "undaunted genius" are rep- resentative of the others. On the other hand, his failure to write down his memoirs of the stage is a genuine loss, judg- ing from the quality of the Brief Supplement to Colley Cibber's Apology. The Brief Supplement is most unique. The criticisms of the actors and actresses included within the author's purview are, of course, partial, sometimes trivial, and sometimes exaggerated. But Aston here does 44 ANTHONY ASTON what scarcely another contemporary was able to do, namely, he hum.anizes the persons dealt with and of. Eschewing mere platitudes, he justifies or condemns by pointing to concrete excellences and palpable faults, — to specific tones and ges- tures, to glances and attitudes, to personal man- nerisms and even to physical defects and virtues which impeded or enhanced the effectiveness of the particular character he writes about. Bell- chamber, who first reprinted the Brief Supple- ment in his "Cabinet" in 1808,^ is very indignant at Aston's characterization of Betterton, but, in this instance, Bcllchamber's prejudice is so marked as to neutralize what might otherwise stand for an excellent judgment. Moreover, he ignores the fact that Aston takes for his text the quotation, Nemo sine crimine vivit, and empha- sizes that it is an antidote to Gibber's Apology that he is preparing. As for the depiction of Betterton, Tony states very clearly that he is writing about the great actor as he knew him, that is, as he appeared in his later years on the stage. And, after all, who has bestowed more intelligent praise, or, which is more to the pur- pose, wh(j has reproduced a living Betterton so well? The same is true of the other portraits in 1. At th