1903 Agric. Dept. r B&ic e BIOLOGT UBRARY AGRICULTURAL llBftARY, CALJFORNI The Development of American Bacteriology BY H. L. RUSSELL MADISON, WIS. REPRINTED FROM MEDICINE WILLIAM M. WARREN, PUBLISHER DECEMBER. 1903 tfaic Lib, BIOLOGY LIBRARY G AGRICULT, ^LIBRARY, -- OF CALIFORNIA, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN BAC* TERIOLOGY. 1 BY H. L. RUSSELL, MADISON, WISCONSIN. Those of us who hail from the middle west, where the cross-currents of a mixed civiliza- tion have mingled many ethnic strains, have perhaps less appreciation of the pride of ances- try than those whose lot it has been to dwell in the shadow of the old family rooftree. Not often does the genealogical fever strike the pioneer or his immediate successors. Gener- ally he is too busy in hewing out a home for himself and family to bother with historical studies. It is only after he strikes it rich that he feels the need of a coat of arms, or his wife seeks admission to the Society of Colonial Dames. In large measure too are historical retrospects likely to be disregarded by those of us who have turned our attention to some of the newer lines of study that are now possible. The student of botany or chemistry or phy- sics has a long and glorious past in which he can revel. If he attempts to prepare a chair- man's address, he may go back in the history 1 Address of the chairman of the Laboratory Section of the American Public Health Association, delivered at Washington, D. C., Oct. 26, 1903. 265583 of his chosen field as far as he wishes to carry his hearers, and may readily gain momentum as he sweeps from the glorious achievements of one master to the next; but the student of a science which in itself is scarcely out of its pioneer days is much more sharply limited in such a retrospect. The science with which most of us who are here gathered have to do is hardly old enough to have a past. True it is that much valuable work has been done in the earlier decades of the century just closed, or even before, but as a scientific subject on a more or less exact foundation, the past two or three decades have given us nearly all the knowledge we have. Previous to this there was no science of bacteriology. The theories* and ideas then accepted were not based in any large measure upon scientific deductions made from closely controlled experimental work, but were more the result of hypothetical postulates, which were often the outcome of merely polemical disputes. The change which confronts the student of to-day is great. Now he finds a large mass of accumulated data, more or less completely or- ganized, and the underlying principles in many lines quite thoroughly marked out. The boun- daries of the province have been more or less sharply defined, and we are recognizing the limitations of even the germ theory of disease, 3 which in earlier days was strained to cover a much wider range of phenomena than future investigations sanctioned. Bacteriology is essentially a present-day sci- ence. The practical results which flow directly from its study need no emphasis, as they form so important a part of scientific endeavor that they cannot be overlooked. They strike home so closely to the life of every individual that the teachings of the science have been accorded a reception in the public mind which shows us the responsibility as well as the opportunity that is before us. The degree of activity which is to be noted indicates a virile, growing sub- ject. If one is to keep up in any considerable measure with the literature of the day, he finds a strenuous course laid out for him. The rapid progress accorded the science in our own country has led me to wonder whether it might not be worth our time to pause for a few moments to consider some phases of its growth. It seems to me if such a considera- tion is pertinent, it is doubly so before an asso- ciation which has done so much within the last few years to foster such development. The distinctively bacteriological societies that we have in America are not old enough to have much more than a kindergarten birthday; nevertheless, they have already been a power- ful means of crystallizing bacteriological effort in this country, and have undoubtedly stimu- 4 lated greatly experimental inquiry. I recall in this connection the earlier days of my own short scientific experience. A decade ago there was hardly any scientific meeting for the bac- teriological student who was not closely in touch with the medical aspect of the work. I remember some few of us used to attend the meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This was long be- fore the days of the Section on Preventive Med- icine. The botanists were our sponsors, but there was little time or opportunity for any discussion on things strictly bacteriological. In considering the development of American bacteriology, it is not intended in any way to intimate that there is an American school in the sense that the Berlin or Paris school used to be spoken of some years ago. The survival of the fittest in matters of technique has now led to the almost universal adoption of methods that have been found to be best adapted to the study of various problems, and these standard methods are more or less commonly followed everywhere. Fortunately, the training of the majority of our American bacteriolo- gists who have studied abroad has not been confined entirely to any one country, although, following the course of most American stu- dents, the larger number have been German trained. This more cosmopolitan training has had its impress on American work, and has 5 given a breadth of view that has been educa- tionally of great advantage. In America it is of course true that here and there individual workers have been engaged in bacteriological research for over a quarter of a century, but within the last few years there has been such an extension of activity, not only in the amount but in the scope of work per- formed, that we may fairly say that American Bacteriology is now on a footing that com- mands scientific attention from older centers of research. The one marked characteristic that is to be noted among the American bacteriologists is that they have been recruited from widely dif- ferent preparatory fields. Like the nation it- self, which has assimilated races and peoples of widely varying origin, the students of this sci- ence have had their preliminary training in lines of work which are strikingly remote from each other. Naturally the great majority of them have approached the subject from a med- ical point of view. This is true not only of those whose work has been in connection with medical schools, but with students of public health, particularly those in the board of health laboratories. The earlier develop-^X ment of the science in the field of medicine for \\r a long time controlled bacteriological activity, but it is fair to assume at the present time that bacteriology is no longer to be regarded simply ,u->^ as a protege of the science of healing, but that it should stand on its own foundation with other biological sciences. A considerable num- ber of our bacteriologists have come at their life-work from the botanical or general biologi- cal point of view. Others, recognizing the importance of this line of activity in the dairy or in general agriculture, have developed their bacteriology from this special standpoint. Several factors have been potent in contrib- uting to this many-sided development of the science in this country. One prominent feature has been in the introduction of the study of bacteriology into the regular science curricula of universities. DEVELOPMENT OF BACTERIOLOGY AS A BIOLOGI- CAL SUBJECT. In Europe the work is almost universally car- ried on in connection with the faculties of med- icine, but in our own country, in a number of universities, sometimes even those provided with medical colleges, bacteriology is taught in the regular science work as a part of biologi- cal instruction. In such institutions bacteriolo- gists may be trained just as are chemists or botanists. Where work of this scope is given, the bacteria are considered as living organisms and are studied as such. The fact that certain forms are capable of calling forth pathological processes, or are concerned in the production of 7 certain fermentative products which may pos- sess a utilitarian value, has no weight except as an expression of more or less highly special- ized physiological activity. If we consider the phenomena of parasitism broadly, it gives a breadth of perspective that is of greatest ser- vice to the student, even if later he should take up a more detailed study of pathogenic forms. So far as I have been able to learn, such pre- paratory work is especially valuable as a basis on which to raise a more technical or special- ized superstructure. It is the general experi- ence of teachers in medical schools that stu- dents who have had their elementary bacteri- ological training in such courses as these are able to make the most progress in their medical work, and obtain a, much broader grasp of the subject than the student who yields to the no- tion that it is much more profitable for him to spend his time wholly on the distinctively 'dis- ease-producing species. The importance of this aspect of the sub- ject in America is evident from a consid- eration of the higher degrees granted in bacteriology by American universities. Al- though the number of those who are specializ- ing in university work in .bacteriology is not large in comparison with those who have made this a subordinate line in their medical course, still it is worthy of note that the number has increased within recent years. Seven doctors of philosophy were granted their degrees in bacteriology at last commencement, and of this number the theses of the majority were on some phase of general bacteriology, more par- ticularly in their chemical relations. This con- dition marks a type of development in Ameri- can bacteriology that is more or less unique, and so far as I know is peculiar to our univer- sity system. Ten or fifteen years ago students who desired to specialize in bacteriology were obliged to go to European laboratories for their work, but with the great improvement which has taken place in this country in scien- tific work during this period, the American student finds the facilities of a number of American laboratories equal in many lines to anything he can get abroad. INFLUENCE OF APPLIED INDUSTRIAL LINES. Another factor which has been the means of bringing a number of bacteriological students from other than the usual field has been the demand for trained workers in connection with agricultural and engineering movements. Sci- entific work in agriculture has been greatly fos- tered by the development 'of the agricultural experiment station movement. Although this idea originated in Germany, the development of the system in this country has now far out- stripped that in Europe, particularly in bring- ing the knowledge of scientific advance within 9 reach of the tillers of the soil. Naturally in the study of soil and crop problems, economic dairying, etc., physics and chemistry especially were recognized as basal studies, but it is now realized that the soil is not composed of a mass of mere inorganic particles, but harbors myri- ads of living forms, which exert a profound effect upon the changes which go on therein. With this realization the importance of bac- terjology has come to be quite generally recog- nized. The same is true with dairy phe- nomena. Nearly all of the numerous dairy schools in our distinctively dairy States, in both this country and Canada, have more or less com- pletely organized and equipped bacteriological laboratories. The general importance of the experiment station movement may be recog- nized when it is known that in the latest pub- lished organization Irst of the station staffs there were over twenty-five persons classed as bacteriologists, a number perhaps small, but representing a growth from nothing a few years ago. In the application of bacteriology to engi- neering practice^ the matter of safeguarding the health of communities by the proper treat- ment of water-supplies and disposal of sewage has been given a marked impetus in this coun- try. Not an inconsiderable number of Ameri- can bacteriologists, particularly those of this association, are to be ranked among those 12 bacteriologist. In fact, we may say that the French idea is rapidly gaining ground, and that our science would be more correctly denomi- nated if it was called micro-biology, than restricted to the study of the bacterial forms. Naturally the most important contributions to this line of science have been in the field which has included the greatest amount of endeavor. The relative predominance of medi- cal inquiry has of course resulted in the maxi- mum degree of effort being spent in this line. In this field American workers have made great progress in attacking American prob- lems. It would be impossible and perhaps un- necessary to go into such a recital in detail, yet it may not be amiss to mention in passing some of the more' salient discoveries which have been made in the respective fields. Take the work of Theobald Smith and his associates on Texas fever. Te problem here was to unravel the mystery surrounding a disease which from a practical point of view seriously impaired the agricultural development of a large section of our country. At the time when the causal agent of this disease was discovered, the rela- tion of protozoan forms to pathological pro- cesses was not as well appreciated as it is now. The discovery of the causal organism and the working out of its life history, especially in relation to its intermediate host, will always remain as a classic example of experimental 13 inquiry, and the successful termination of such researches in the development of efficient pro- tective measures attest the value of these dis- coveries from a purely practical point of view. From the practical results that have followed from scientific investigations, no line of work has been fraught with more import than that which has been carried on by the lamented Reed and his associates on yellow fever. Curi- ously enough, the inception of the theory that this disease was transmitted by mosquitoes was American, yet the idea lay fallow for a consid- erable period of time, until the researches re- ferred to were so convincing that the whole system of prophylaxis was changed almost in a day. The curse which for centuries, has rested on the seaport towns of our sister republics as well as menaced our own borders seems likely to be removed as if by magic. In the line of problems that have engaged the attention of many other observers may be mentioned the venom work of Flexner and his associates, also the researches which have been made on Shiga's organism and their rela- tion to infantile disorders; the important mor- phological researches of Opie and MacCallum on the significance of the flagellated struc- tures in malarial parasites and other hemame- bae; the recent discoveries of Councilman on smallpox. The work of Smith and Ravenel on the 14 tubercle bacillus has been not only opportune but convincing, and the work of de Schweinitz, Trudeau, Pearson and Gilliland on immuniza- . tion of animals against this organism bids fair to make an advance step in the warfare against this disease that will be of greater importance than even the discovery of the causal organism itself. It is also a matter of considerable pride that American bacteriologists should have even been the pioneers in some of the fields of research. The demonstration of the etiology of plant dis- eases of a bacterial nature is to be credited to American bacteriology. The first studies on this subject were made on the fire blight of pears and apples by Professor Burrill, and to him and a number of other workers belongs the credit of proving the relation of this disease to bacterial agency. The etiology of this dis- ease has been as thoroughly proven as was that of anthrax, all of the canons of Koch being ful- filled, and yet this work is often not accepted by many European workers. They consid- ered the evidence as inadequate to show that a causal relation existed between the organism and the disease in question. It is surprising even yet to see the attitude which is taken by many foreign writers on this subject. Text-books of German origin often wholly ignore the relation of bacteria to plants, or pass it over with a brief reference in an '5 Anhang. It might be thought that this posi- tion arose from the fact that these diseases were less common in Europe than here, but since the experience of Harding, who found the well known bacterial black rot of cabbage distributed widely throughout all Europe and even in the botanical gardens of some of the universities, it seems that a failure to adopt the results of work carefully performed in this, country must rest upon some other reason than lack of opportunity to study these maladies. Another field in which American investiga- tion has been particularly fruitful has been in the study of the problems associated with puri- fication of water-supplies, and also in sewage disposal. Problems of this character press most earnestly for solution in older settled countries, and it is therefore a matter of some moment that American laboratories should have played so important a part in the develop- ment of this knowledge. The classical re- searches which were begun by the State Board of Health of Massachusetts in the latter part of the eighties,, at which time the Lawrence Ex- periment Station was founded, have always occupied a foremost position in work of this character. Many of the underlying principles relating to the proper methods of sand filtra- tion were first developed in this country. In technical methods, too, marked advances have been made. Particularly is this true with i6 reference to uniformity in methods, a condition which has been brought about largely through the efforts of the Bacteriological Committee and Standing Committees of our own Section. The development of American bacteriology has just begun, but we may fairly say it has been well begun. The present shows a strong school of experimenters, broadly trained, and approaching their problems from a wide range in point of view, a condition that enables them to obtain that proper perspective which is so essential to successful specialization. The future is even richer in promise. FUTURE PROSPECTS. Xhe great impetus which is now being given to medical instruction is sure to aid materially in the development of bacteriological work. Within the past decade the requirements of medical instruction have been greatly aug- mented, and among the sciences to which much more attention is being paid is that of bacteri- ology. The establishment of research labora- tories in connection with greatly improved hos- pital facilities gives an opportunity for gradu- ate work which will soon equal if not excel the facilities offered anywhere else in the world. One of the marked characteristics of Ameri- , can philanthropy has been its devotion to edu- cation. Of the millions that are annually given to this purpose, not an inconsiderable amount will naturally be used to foster and develop 17 such sciences as this which so strongly appeal to the practical man of affairs, and the estab- lishment of such institutions as the Rockefeller Institute, the Carnegie Institution, and the vari- ous foundations for the special study of re- stricted fields like tuberculosis will all aid greatly in the development of American sci- ence. For a number of years the government has been doing a large amount of bacteriologi- cal work along lines which are primarily of interest to agriculture, but the scope of these studies has been materially broadened within the last few years, through the formation of the Public Health Service in connection with the Marine Hospital Service. Work along these sanitary or hygienic lines will also doubt- less be greatly extended through the medium of State and municipal public health laboratories. The original function of these laboratories was largely of a routine character, but with the development of bacteriology the scope of their activity has been greatly increased, and already a number of them have become strong research centers. The opportunity for coopera- tive effort among a number of institutions carrying on allied work is excellent, and the auspicious beginning made in the diphtheria work of the Massachusetts and Minnesota boards of health augurs well for the advantage to be derived from such joint investigations. i8 The facilities of American laboratories now rival many of the most famous institutions in Europe, but in matters relating to publication American work has not been as fully recog- nized as it ought. We now have a number of journals which are more or less distinctively bacteriological, but they are concerned more particularly with certain phases of the science, such as the relation of bacteriology to medicine. It may not be possible, but the establishment of a medium of publication that would especially embrace the activity of American work would undoubtedly be of great service in bringing a more complete knowledge of American investi- gations to all American workers as well as aid- ing greatly the bibliographical labors of for- eign scientists. As it is now much of this work is reported in various journals and reports, many of which are not accessible to the great majority of other investigators. If we had in bacteriology a publication that would do for this science what the Experiment Sta- tion Record does for the American Agricul- tural Experiment Station, it would be invalua- ble. This publication is sustained by govern- mental aid, but it has undoubtedly been not only the means of widening the sphere of influ- ence of American agricultural work abroad, but it has greatly aided in the development of experiment stations in this country. It is to be hoped that the representative bac- 19 teriological societies in this country may agree on some feasible plan which will result in the consummation of this project. O the circulation desk of any 'ersity of California Library or to the N REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY Richmond Field Station of California CA 94804-4698 MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS s may be renewed by calling >233 Tiay be recharged by bringing books d recharges may be made 4 days e date JE AS STAMPED BELOW E JAN 15*87 3 1996 265583 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA