L 
 
 %HA
 
 t THE ADVERTISEMENT SHEET OF 
 
 This day is Published, 
 BY R. ACKERMANN, 96, STRAND, 
 
 A NEW ANNUAL, ENTITULED 
 
 THE HUMOURIST, 
 
 BY W. H. HARRISON, ESQ. 
 
 AUTHOR OF "TALES OP A PHYSICIAN," &C. 
 
 Illustrated by Fifty Wood Engravings, exclusive of numerous Vignettes, 
 from Drawings by the late THOMAS ROWLANDSON. 
 This volume is handsomely printed in post 8vo. price 12*. bound in morocco. 
 
 ALSO, 
 
 FORGET-ME-NOT FOR 1831, 
 
 Containing nearly 400 pages of Letter-press, consisting of between Sixty and 
 Seventy articles in prose and verse by the most eminent popular Writers of 
 both sexes, embellished by fourteen exquisitely finished Engravings on steel, 
 executed after designs by eminent painters. Price 12. 
 
 ALSO, 
 
 ACKERMANN'S JUVENILE FORGET-ME-NOT 
 
 FOR 1831, 
 
 Embellished by Ten Engravings on steel by eminent Artists. The universal 
 commendations of the public press, and the sale of a large impression of the 
 first Volume, attest the strong claims of this work to the notice of parents, 
 guardians, teachers, and the friends of youth of both sexes, who wish to put 
 into their hands an Elegant Miscellany, expressly adapted to their ;r_'i- and 
 capacity, and conducive alike to moral improvement and pleasing instruction. 
 Price 8s. 
 
 This day is published, the (ith edit. 
 12mo., price lo.v. fxl. bds. 
 
 A GRAMMAR OF ^ HE GER- 
 MAN LANGUAGE. By GEORGE 
 HENRY NOEHDEN, Ph. D. LL.D. 
 
 Printed for Longman, Rees, Ormt, 
 Brown, and Green; T. Cadell ; T. and 
 T. Boosey; J. Booth; Baldwin and 
 Cradock ; J. Booker; Dulan and 
 Co.; Trenttel, Wnrtz, and Co. ; Simp- 
 kin and Marshall; Black, Young, and 
 Co.; and W. J. and J. Maynard. 
 
 Of whom also may be had, 
 
 EXERCISES FOR WRITING 
 GERMAN, according to the Rules of 
 Grammar. By Dr. NOEHDEN. 5th 
 edition, 12mo. price 8s. bds. 
 
 RABENHORST'S POCKET 
 DICTIONARY of the GERMAN and 
 ENGLISH LANGUAGES. By G. 
 H. NOEHDEN, LL.D. Ph.D. 3d edit, 
 price 13s. bound. 
 
 NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY op 
 
 NORTHUMBERLAND, DURHAM, 
 
 AND NEWCASTLE. 
 
 This day is published, in quarto, If. Is. 
 TRANSACTIONS nr THE 
 \ VTIUAL HISTORY SOCIETY of 
 NORTHl MBKKLXM), 1)1 RH AM, 
 and NEWCASTLE-l PON-TYNK, 
 Voluire I. Part I: containing Articles 
 by the Hon. H. T. LIDDEI.I,, Dr. 
 JOHNSTON, Rrv. W. TURNER, P. J. 
 SELBY, W. C. TREVELYAN, JOHN 
 BUDDLE, N. J. WINCH, \\ . Hi TTON, 
 J. ALDER, M. PORSTEH, F. FORSTER, 
 R. R. WINGATE, and H. L. PATTIN- 
 SON ; and illustrated by eleven Plates. 
 
 ** The First Report of the Society, 
 including the Laws, is given with the 
 Transactions. 
 
 NrwraMle: Printed by T. and J. 
 Horizon, for Kineisiin Charnlry ; 
 T.on'j!!!, ii an 1 Co., London; and \V. 
 Blackwood, Edinburgh.
 
 DR. LARDNER S CABINET CYCLOPEDIA. 
 
 This day is published, 
 Price 6. 
 
 THE 
 
 EDINBURGH REVIEW; 
 
 OB, 
 
 CRITICAL JOURNAL, 
 
 No. 103. 
 
 Printed for Longman & Co., London ; 
 and A. Black, Edinburgh. 
 
 TO CLERGYMEN 
 AND PUBLIC ORATORS. 
 
 MONSIEUR MALLAN & SON, SUR- 
 GEON-DENTISTS, No. 32, GREAT RUS- 
 SELL-STREET, BLQOMSBCJRY, and No. 
 0, HALF-MOON-STREET,PICCADILLY, 
 respectfully solicit the attention of 
 the Nobility and Public of the British 
 Metropolis to their newly -invented 
 MINERAL TEETH, which are inca- 
 pable of DISCOLORATION or CORRO- 
 SION; which, when fixed in the 
 mouth, either singly or in sets, give 
 perfect sound of articulation, more par- 
 ticularly the DENTOLINGUAL doable 
 Consonant (TH). Messrs. M. submit 
 that these are advantages of the ut- 
 most consequence to CLERGYMEN, 
 PUBLIC LECTURERS, and PARLIA- 
 MENTARY ORATORS. Dissenting from 
 the practice of all other Dentists, 
 M. use neither wire nor 
 other ligature, but fix the Teeth on a 
 peculiar principle, so as to support the 
 adjoining ones, whilst pressure on the 
 "inn is avoided. Messrs. M. are like- 
 wise the INVENTORS of an INVU.I- 
 ABLE MINERAL SUBSTANCE for FILL- 
 ING DECAYED TEETH, which, whilst 
 il instantly relieves the agony of 
 TOOTH-ACHE, and prevents the ne- 
 < , -Mty of Extraction, arrests the pro- 
 ;,-re>s uf decay, and identifies itself 
 with the body of the Tooth in the form 
 of a hard and durable enamel. They 
 also FASTEN LOOSE TEETH in a man- 
 ner -insularly efficacious, even in the 
 most apparently hopeless cases, aris- 
 ing from age, neglect, or disease of 
 ; and to the latter they i;i\e 
 a tone of elasticity and BimMM, bj 
 the application of medicaments in- 
 vented by and known only to them- 
 
 selse-. 
 
 Charges the same as in Paris. 
 
 In 1 vol. 4to., on royal drawing paper 
 with 7 Plates, by E. Finden, 
 
 price 2/. 12*. 6d. 
 London, 1830 : J. Hearne ; and W 
 
 Blackwood, Edinburgh, 
 ILLUSTRATIONS CF THE 
 ANGLO-FRENCH COINAGE, from 
 A.D. 1152 to 1454. Bv LIEUTENANT 
 GENERAL AINSLIE, F.A.S.S. Lond 
 et Scot., of the Royal Societies 01 
 France, Normandy, &c. &c. 
 " Sparsa Colleyi." 
 The London Literary Gazette, May 
 15, says, " To this very beautiful, and 
 to the lovers of Numismatics, most 
 interesting and invaluable work, we 
 cannot this week pay the detailed at- 
 tention it so rightly deserves; we wil 
 therefore only say, that it illustrates 
 the Mintage of the English Kings in 
 r ranee for three centuries, from A.D. 
 1152 to 1454, in a manner beyond all 
 praise. The author, by his amazin" 
 industry and skilful comments, has 
 corrected errors and added some most 
 curious particulars to this most memo- 
 rable period of English History." And 
 again, on June 12, the same celebrated 
 Journalist continues : " It is a vast ac- 
 cession to our Numismatic knowledge ; 
 indeed, we deem it a perfect treasure 
 of its kind, and extremely honourable 
 to individual enterprise, both in mak- 
 ing so extraordinary a collection, and 
 affording so beautiful an account of it 
 to the public. It is full of singular 
 antiquarian matter." " But we have 
 said and extracted enough to put every 
 Numismatologist, and, we trust, many 
 readers of other literary habits, on the 
 qm cite to examine this estimable work. 
 
 INGENIOUS AMUSEMENT. 
 
 S. and J. FULLER beg to 
 recommend .to the ingenious, their 
 newly invented TRANSFER VAR- 
 NISH, such as has been used of late 
 with so much success and admiration 
 in Paris, for the transferring of all 
 kinds of prints and engravings to 
 wood, as if the same were printed 
 thereon ; adapted for ornamenting ca- 
 binets, work-boxes, pier-tables, chess- 
 boards, face screens, &C. 
 
 Made, and sold in bottles, with 
 printed directions, price Is., by S 
 and J. FULLER, at the Temple of 
 Fancy, 34, Rathbone Place; where 
 every description of white wood-work 
 i? sold for the above purpose. 
 f arnishing done in a superior manner.
 
 THE ADVERTISEMENT SHEET, &C. 
 
 PUBLICATIONS 
 
 OP 
 THE RELIGIOUS TRACT SOCIETY, 
 
 No. 56, Paternoster-Row. 
 
 PUBLICATIONS ADAPTED FOR 
 ANNUAL PRESENTS. 
 
 Just published, 
 
 THE FLOWERS OF THE 
 FOREST. By the Author of " Little 
 Henry and his Bearer," hf-bonnd calf, 
 gilt edges, or in silk, 2s. Si/. 
 
 To be published in November, 
 THE DAILY SCRIPTURE 
 INSTRUCTOR, boards, 1*. 6d., bound 
 in silk, Is. M. 
 
 DEWDROPS, a very small 
 Selection of Daily Texts, 1*. locks, 
 stiff covers, 4d. 
 
 GEMS OE SACRED POE- 
 TRY. &4rao. tacks, 2s. stiff covers, 1*. 
 
 DAILY FOOD ron CHRIS- 
 TIANS. 64mo. tucks, Is. 6d., stiff 
 covers, M. 
 
 DAILY TEXTS FOR GENERAL 
 USE. 64mo. tucks Is. 4d., stiff covers 6d. 
 
 THE DIARY, INTERLEAVED. 
 Olnio. tucks, l.s. srf. 
 
 MASON'S CRUMBS. 64mo. 
 
 tucks, 1*. 6d., stiff covers, Sd. 
 
 SI BBS' MEDITATIONS. 
 
 fitino. tucks, Is. 6d., stiff covers, Sd. 
 
 PRAYERS FOR EVERY 
 DAY. 64mo. tucks, Is. 4d., stiff covers, 
 64. 
 
 THE DAILY SCRIPTURE 
 EXPOSITOR. 32mo. boards, Is. 6d. 
 silk, 2s. 6d. 
 
 PERSUASIVES TO EARLY 
 PIETY. 32mo. boards, I*., calf gilt, 
 
 iv. \'l. 
 
 FLETCHER'S ADDRESS. 
 32rao. half calf gilt, Is. 
 
 SERMONS ON THE SEA- 
 SONS, for the Young. 32mo. half 
 calf, Is. 4d. 
 
 MALAN'S NARRATIVES, 
 
 for the Young. 32mo. half-bound, 2s. 
 
 RICHMOND'S ANNALS. 
 
 32mo. 3s. 6d. bound in cloth, or 5s. 6d. 
 in ornamented silk. 
 
 NEALE'S EMBLEMS, for 
 the Young. 32mo. 2s. half-bound. 
 
 MARY ANNE. 32mo. 8<Z. 
 
 THE RED BOOK. 32mo. 8rf. 
 
 GRANDFATHER GRE- 
 GORY. 32mo. Is. red sheep. 
 
 A PRESENT FOR THE 
 YOUNG. 18mo., half-bound, 2s. 
 
 THE TWO SISTERS. 18mo., 
 half-bound, 2s. 
 
 STORIES FROM SWITZER- 
 LAND. 18mo., half-bound, 2s. 
 
 CHRISTIAN BIOGRA- 
 PHY, Eight volumes, 18mo., h r -bd. 
 4s. each. 
 
 This day is published, in 3 vols. 12mo. 
 price 18s. 
 
 THE QUEEN'S PAGE. A 
 
 Romance. By Selina Davenport, Au- 
 thor of " Italian Vengeance," " Pre- 
 ference," " Hypocrite," " Original of 
 the Miniature," "An Angel's Form," 
 and " Devil's Heart," &c. 
 
 Printed for A. K. NEWMAN and Co., 
 London : 
 
 Where may be had, just ready, 
 
 CAMDEN, a Tale of the 
 
 South, 3 volj. 16s. 6d. 
 
 CICELY; or, the Rose of 
 Raby, a Romance, 4th edit. 4 vols. II. 
 
 SECRETS IN EVERY 
 MANSION. 2d edit. 5 vols. \l. 10s. 
 
 WEIRD WOMAN, By Mr. 
 
 COITES, 4 vols. II. -4s. 
 
 SAILOR BOY. By ROSALIA 
 'ST. CLAIR, 4 vols. I/. 4s. 
 
 London: Printed by S. Manning & Co., London-house-yard, St. Paul's.
 
 ttts/& 
 
 jft/& 
 
 THE 
 
 CABINET CYCLOPAEDIA.
 
 LONDON : 
 
 Printed by A. ft U. Spottiswoode, 
 New-Street. Square.
 
 THE 
 
 CABINET CYCLOPAEDIA. 
 
 CONDUCTED BY THE 
 
 REV. D1ONYSIUS LARDNER, J,L.D. F.R.S. L. & E. 
 M.R.I.A. F.L.S. F.Z.S. Hon. F.C.P.S. M.Ast.S. &c. &c. 
 
 ASSISTED BY 
 
 .EMINENT LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC MEN. 
 
 FRANCE. 
 
 BY 
 
 EYRE EVANS CROWE. 
 VOL. I 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 PRINTED FOR 
 
 LONGMAN, KEES, ORME, BROWN, AND GREEN, 
 
 PATEBNOSTER-ROW ; 
 
 AND JOHN TAYLOR, 
 
 UPPER COWER STREET. 
 
 1830.
 
 On the 1st of December will be published, 
 
 THE 
 
 FIRST VOLUME 
 
 OF THE 
 
 CABINET JLIBRARY, 
 
 CONDUCTED BY 
 THE REV. DIONYSIUS LARDNER, LL.D. F.R.S. &c. 
 
 ASSISTED BY EMINENT LITE K A 11 Y AND SCIENTIFIC MEN. 
 
 TO BE CONTINUED IN MONTHLY VOLUMES, SMALL 8VO. PRICE 5s. 
 
 BEING THE FIRST VOLUME OF THE 
 MILITARY MEMOIRS OF 
 
 FIELD-MARSHAL THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON. 
 In Two Volumes. By CAPT. MOYLB SHBREH. 
 
 TO BE FOLLOWED BT 
 
 THE FRENCH RBVOLUTION IN 1830. By T. BABINGTON MACAULEY, Esq. M.P. 
 THE LIFE AND REIGN OF GEORGE THE FOURTH. 
 
 In Three Volumes. 
 *#* A Biographical Work by THOJCAS MOOKB, Esq. will be among the early Volumes. 
 
 PROSPECTUS. 
 
 IN announcing for publication another Monthly Series, similar in external 
 appearance to THE CABINET CYCLOPEDIA, it will be expected that the Pub- 
 lishers should explain the different objects which they have in view in these 
 two works, and show that neither is intended to interfere with^or to 
 intrench upon the other. 
 
 The object of THE CABINET CYCLOPAEDIA is to form a systematic work, 
 including, within moderate and definite limits, every subject of utility and 
 interest in the circle of human knowledge. A proportion will be observed 
 among its several divisions, and each subject will be treated, as nearly as 
 possible, with that degree of detail to which its general importance and its 
 relation to the other parts of the Cyclopaedia entitle it. By this arrangement 
 it is hoped that THE CABINET CYCLOPAEDIA will form a valuable Library of 
 reference, supplying all that is expected in a Cyclopaedia, while the peculiar 
 plan of publication will sustain a continued interest during the progressive 
 appearance of the volumes, and thus stimulate and gratify the appetite for 
 useful information. 
 
 It has been found, however, that besides the subjects, numerous and 
 important as they are, which such a plan embraces, others have, from time 
 to time, presented themselves, possessing considerable claims to attention, 
 and requiring to be treated with a different degree of detail Amongst these 
 may be mentioned Personal Memoirs, detached Historical Pieces, and Voy. 
 ages and Travels. These subjects, and others, frequently receive an im- 
 mediate and powerful interest from their relation to passing events, and the 
 Public not only require to be informed concerning them, but ought to get 
 that information at the time when they most need it. 
 
 With a view, therefore, to open a field for such useful and interesting 
 subjects, the Proprietors of THE CABINET CYCLOPAEDIA have" determined on 
 publishing at an equally cheap r.tte, and In the same form a COMPANION 
 to that Work, under the title of THE CABINET LIBRARY. By this means, 
 without disturbing the plan or arrangement of the Cyclopaedia, they hope 
 to enable the Subscribers to enlarge their Collection to any extent that may 
 be desired, and to offer to the Public in general, a Series of useful and en- 
 tertaining Volumes at an unusually moderate price. 
 
 The Volumes of THE CABINET LIBRARY will be supplied by the>ame 
 class of Literary Contributors as those of THE CABINET CYCLOPEDIA, and 
 it is hoped that the embellishments and typographical qualities of the work 
 will not be inferior to those of any similar" publication of the present day. 
 
 Printed for LONGMAV, REES.ORME, BROWN, and GREEN, Paternoster- Row
 
 DR. LARDNER'S 
 
 CABINET CYCLOPEDIA. 
 
 PUBLISHED IN MONTHLY VOLUMES, SMALL 8vO., PRICE 6s. 
 
 VOLUMES PUBLISHED. 
 
 1. 4. The HISTOKY of SCOTLAND, in 2 Vols. By Sir Walter Scott 
 
 2. 11. The HISTORY of MARITIME DISCOVERY, in 3 Vols. Vols. 1. and 2. 
 
 3. DOMESTIC ECONOMY. By Professor Donovan, VoL 1. 
 
 5. MECHANICS. By Capt H. Kater and Dr. Lardner. 
 
 & LIVES OF EMINENT BRITISH LAWYERS. By H. Roscoe, Esq. 
 
 7. CITIES and PRINCIPAL TOWNS of the WORLD, in 3 Vols.' VoL 1. 
 
 8. The HISTORY of ENGLAND, in 8 Vols. By the Right Hon. Sir James 
 
 Mackintosh. Vol. 1. 
 a OUTLINES of HISTORY. 
 10. The HISTORY of the NETHERLANDS, from the Earliest Times to the 
 
 Battle of Waterloo. By Thomas Colley G rattan. 
 12. The HISTORY of FRANCE to the Deposition of Charles X., in 3 Vols. 
 
 By Eyre Evans Crowe. VoL 1. 
 
 FORTHCOMING VOLUMES. 
 
 A PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE on the STUDY of NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. By 
 
 J. F. W. Herschel, M. A. of St John's College, Cambridge. 
 The HISTORY of MARITIME DISCOVERY VoL 3. 
 The HISTORY of FRANCE. VoL 2. 
 The HISTORY of ENGLAND. VoL 2. 
 
 VOLUMES IN IMMEDIATE PREPARATION. 
 
 The HISTORY of ENGLAND. By Sir James Mackintosh. VoL 3. 
 
 The HISTORY of IRELAND. By Thomas Moore, Esq. 
 
 LIVES of BRITISH NAVAL COMMANDERS. By Robert Southey, Esq. LL.D. 
 
 Poet Laureate. 
 ATs 
 LIVES i 
 
 the principal "Literary and Scientific Contributors to the Cyclopa^iia. 
 A PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE on the USEFUL ARTS and MANUFACTURES. By 
 
 the Baron Charles Dupin. 
 
 HYDROSTATICS and PNEUMATICS. By Dr. Lardner. 
 LIVES of BRITISH MILITARY COMMANDERS, in 2 Vols. By the Rev. O. R. 
 
 Gleig, Author of " The Subaltern." 
 The COTTON MANUFACTURE. By Dr. Ure 
 The HISTORY of GREECE, in 3 Vols. By the Rev. C. Thirlwall, Fellow of 
 
 Trinity College, Cambridge. 
 A TREATISE on OPTICS. By Dr. Brewster. 
 LIVES of the MOST EMINENT ARTISTS. By W. Y. Ottley, Esq. and T. Phillips, 
 
 R. A. Professor of Painting to the Royal Academy. 
 
 A COMPLETE SYSTEM of NATURAL HISTORY, in 12 Vols. By the most emi- 
 nent Naturalists of the Age, Fellows of the Linnsean and Zoological 
 
 Societies. 
 
 TO SUBSCRIBERS. 
 
 SOME Subscribers to the CABINET CYCLOPEDIA having expressed dissatis- 
 faction that the several volumes of each work are not brought out in unin- 
 terrupted succession, the Editor assures them that every exertion will be 
 made to abridge the interval which must elapse between the appearance of 
 the succeeding volumes of the same work. The Subscribers will, however, 
 see the impossibility of attaining the object of their wishes in every instance. 
 The volumes of the same work being the production of the same author, a 
 reasonable time must elapse after the publication of one volume, for the 
 completion of the next ; otherwise no volume of a work could be published 
 until the whole work were written ; a circumstance which would be, in 
 most cases, as little desired by the Subscribers as by the Publishers.
 
 Jinr OF 
 
 r 
 
 ; ''YJL'tfB 'J-"f. 
 
 
 
 r.r . PATE?Orc.ST; 
 "VKR 3THEET.
 
 Stack 
 Annex 
 
 PC 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAP. I. 
 The Merovingians and Carlovingians .... Page 1 
 
 CHAP. II. 
 
 9871226. 
 From the Accession of Hugh Capet to that of Saint Louis. - - 23 
 
 CHAP. III. 
 
 12261325. 
 From the Accession of St. Louis to that of the Race of Valois. - 62 
 
 CHAP. IV. 
 
 13281461. 
 From the Acession of Philip of Valois to that of Louis XI. . 91 
 
 CHAP. V. 
 
 14611515. 
 
 From the Accession of Louis XI. to that of Francis I. - - 144 
 
 . 
 
 CHAP. VI. 
 
 15151547. 
 
 Francis the First .. . . 192 
 
 CHAP. VIJ. 
 
 15471559. 
 Henry the Second - .... 262
 
 VI CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAP. VIII. 
 
 15591574. 
 Francis the Second and Charles the Ninth . - 296 
 
 CHAP. IX. 
 
 15741589. 
 
 Henry the Third ..... 328 
 
 CHAP. X. 
 
 15891610. 
 
 Henry the Fourth . . . . - - 343 

 
 THE 
 
 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE MEROVINGIANS AND CAKLOVINGIANS. 
 
 GAUL was reduced by Caesar under subjection to the 
 Romans about fifty years previous to the birth of Christ. 
 The country remained for the space of five centuries 
 under their sway, troubled, nevertheless, during the 
 latter half of the period by the incursions, conflicts, and 
 finally by the settlement, of barbarian invaders. Under 
 its first- conquerors Gaul made rapid progress in improve- 
 ment. It received the advantages of political union, of 
 an enlightened system of justice, of a long interval of 
 peace ; and wealth, industry, agriculture, and commerce 
 soon followed as necessary consequences. The very cli- 
 mate was wonderfully ameliorated, and the soil rendered 
 capable of producing and maturing those choice fruits 
 which the Romans introduced. The vine, the olive, even 
 the useful plant of flax, were brought thither from the 
 south. The Christian religion, too, was amongst the 
 boons, which Rome gave to her subject lands in return 
 for their political independence : nor can the conquests of 
 >'hat ambitious city be said to have been, on the whole, 
 structive of liberty ; since by her were sown these pre- 
 us seeds of municipal union and rights which were 
 T altogether stifled, and which sprang, vjp after the 
 inter of the dark arcs, to offer the earliest bud- 
 " civilisation, and to bear the first fruits of modern
 
 2 HISTORY OP FRANCE. A. D. 400. 
 
 Of the natural and well-known boundaries of the Ro- 
 man province of Gaul, the Rhine was the most important. 
 It was the great barrier which defended the empire 
 from the errant tribes and nations that swarmed beyond. 
 Wealth and civilisation were on one side of the stream ; 
 want and barbarism upon the other. Betwixt such 
 neighbours the natural state is war. The disciplined 
 legions of Rome, however, quelled the turbulence of 
 the German tribes, penetrated far and at different in- 
 tervals into their country, fully avenged one or two 
 defeats, and long held their rude enemies in salutary 
 awe. 
 
 The Germans, though little versed in policy, began 
 after some time to perceive that their frequent defeats 
 were in a great measure owing to their disunion, to their 
 dispersion in different tribes, and to the want of any 
 solid or lasting bond of connection, whilst they were op- 
 posed by the united mind and forces of a large empire. 
 The mutual leagues hitherto formed amongst the barba- 
 rians were not sufficiently knit and woven together. The 
 consciousness of this defect produced in the third cen- 
 tury those confederacies, in which many tribes united, 
 not occasionally but lastingly, under one common name, 
 and often under one monarch or chief. Some assumed 
 the appellation of Allemanni, or All- Men ; others, the 
 simpler distinction of Franks, that is, Brave or Free 
 Men. 
 
 The chief seat of the confederacy of the Franks was 
 that marshy territory, overflowed and divided into islets 
 by the Rhine, from the spot where the river commences 
 to turn westward, to its junction with the sea. The first 
 mention of them by the historians of the empire takes 
 place A. D. 241. In nearly forty years after, Probus 
 quelled one of their incursions, and drove them back into 
 their morasses. The civil war betwixt Magnentius and 
 Constantius, which occupied and wasted the Roman 
 forces in mutual slaughter, allowed both Franks and Alle- 
 manni to establish their desolate rule on the left bank 
 of the Rhine. The emperor Julian defeated and sub-
 
 A. . 410. GAUL OVER-RUN BY BARBARIANS. 3 
 
 dued them, drove the Allemanni within their ancient 
 bounds, but allowed the Franks to settle permanently 
 on the Roman side of the Rhine, in the province of 
 Toxandria, supposed to be the modern Brabant. 
 
 The commencement of the fifth century is marked by 
 the great and victorious irruption of all the barbarian 
 hosts into Gaul. They poured, like a long pent up and 
 gathering tide, in a thousand destructive torrents through- 
 out the land, sweeping away and overwhelming in a 
 mass, life, property, and institutions. Were it not for 
 the Christian church, which held itself aloft and alive 
 above the general inundation, the very memory and pre- 
 cious traditions of the past would have perished amidst 
 the universal ruin. Years elapsed, ere the agitation sub- 
 sided and the inebriety of conquest was over.- When 
 calm was restored, the Visigoths were in possession of 
 Aquitaine and the lands southward of the Loire, with 
 Toulouse for their capital. The Burgundians held the 
 provinces bordering on the Rhone, from the lake of Ge- 
 neva to the Mediterranean. Brittany had established a 
 kind of independence. The Franks, who had looked on 
 themselves as the allies more than as the enemies of 
 Roman power, and who had at first bravely stood forth 
 in its defence, had advanced their establishments over 
 the present Netherlands to the limits of modern France; 
 whilst the central provinces, preserved to the empire by 
 the victories of yEtius, were, like Britain, gradually aban- 
 doned to themselves, and came to obey, under Roman 
 forms and titles, the wealthiest and most powerful of the 
 native provincials. It was thus that count uEgidius, and 
 after him his son Syagrius, governed, and were even said 
 to have reigned at Soissons. 
 
 It is singular to observe that, of all the nations which 
 over-ran Gaul, that which eventually subdued the rest, 
 and gave its name both to the land and to the general 
 race, was the least united, and the least advanced in 
 the arts of life and policy. Both the Goths and the 
 Burgundians were more civilised than the Franks. Each 
 of the former was a nation, forming one race, and obey- 
 * 2
 
 4 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 485. 
 
 ing one monarch and family of monarchs. The Franks, 
 on the contrary, were but a looser kind of confederacy, 
 which held together still less as they advanced from the 
 Rhine. Each town or territory had its petty and inde- 
 pendent sovereign ; and previous to Clovis, we meet 
 with no sign of supreme chief or capital town amongst 
 them. This, no doubt, was advantageous to them. They 
 were thus more free to emigrate and to invade. It left 
 the throne of chieftaincy open to the first leader of pre- 
 eminent talents ; whilst the vagueness and comprehen- 
 siveness of their name was calculated to congregate and 
 admit beneath their banner any roving bands, or even 
 whole nations, of barbarians that might be in search of 
 plunder or establishments. 
 
 Such is the secret of the rise of Clovis, the founder of 
 the French monarchy. He was the young chief or king 
 of a small colony of the Franks established at Tournay. 
 In conjunction with the Frank chief of Cambray, he 
 attacked Syagrius, the provincial governor of the Sois- 
 sonnois, defeated him, and took possession of his territory 
 and capital. (A. D. 485.) It was on this occasion the cir- 
 cumstance took place, so often narrated and alluded to as a 
 proof of the piety of the king, and the independent habits 
 of the barbarians. A silver vase, reserved for sacred uses, 
 had been taken, amidst other plunder, from the church 
 of Rheims. It was at Soissons that the distribution of 
 booty was to take place. Thither came Saint Remy, 
 bishop of Rheims, supplicating for the restoration of the 
 silver vase. Clovis was favourable to the bishop's request, 
 and sought to gratify it. He addressed his assembled 
 soldiers, and begged of them, in addition to his share, 
 to grant him the vase in question. Ere the assembly 
 could answer, a cholerous soldier, jealous of his rights, 
 struck the vase with his axe, exclaiming that the king 
 had no right to more than fell to his allotment. Despite 
 the rudeness of the act, it was still consonant to the 
 habits and laws of the free barbarians. Clovis was 
 obliged to dissemble his resentment, and defer his venge- 
 ance. It was not until several months after, that, at a
 
 496. CLOVIS. 5 
 
 review, he took an opportunity to find fault with the 
 breaker of the vase for the bad condition of his arms. 
 Clovis flung the soldier's axe to the ground, and whilst 
 the latter stooped to pick up the weapon, the monarch 
 slew him with a blow of his own, exclaiming, " Thus 
 didst thou serve the vase of Soissons ! " 
 
 Clovis, like all the heroes and eminent men of those 
 ages, paid great respect to the church, and received con- 
 siderable advantage from its aid. The Franks had been 
 hitherto heathens; but Clovis, having married Clotilda, 
 a Burgundian princess, became instructed in the rites 
 and religion of the Christians. In the heat of a battle 
 against the Germans in the neighbourhood of Cologne, 
 Clovis recalled the example of Constantine, who in a 
 doubtful moment of action invoked the God of the Chris- 
 tians, and was heard. The king of the Franks imitated 
 the example of the Roman, prayed for victory to the 
 God of Clotilda and of Constantine, won it soon after, 
 and was baptized, with the greater number of his 
 followers, in grateful acknowledgment of the divine 
 aid. Clovis had the good fortune to imbibe Christianity 
 at its pure source. The Visigoth and Burgundian 
 monarchs, though Christian, were Arians at this time. 
 Clovis received the orthodox faith, which brought to him 
 the zealous support of the Gaulish clergy, and gave to 
 him the title of Most Christian King, worn by his suc- 
 cessors to the present day. 
 
 The comparison between Clovis and Constantine might 
 be followed farther. Their embracing of Christianity 
 had a similar effect upon both. Instead of tempering 
 their passions, and inspiring them with the virtues of 
 mildness and mercy, it seems to have rather given rein 
 to their ferocity and blood- thirstiness. The domestic 
 murders committed by Constantine, that of his wife, and 
 of his son, are known. To assassination Clovis united 
 perfidy. All the rival monarchs or chieftains whom he 
 could conquer or entrap were sacrificed to his jealousy 
 and ambition. The whole race of a rival family was 
 extirpated, in some instances, by the hand of Clovis him- 
 B 3
 
 6 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 511. 
 
 self. How could Christianity be made conducive to such 
 crimes ? By being coupled with the corrupt doctrine of 
 personal confession and absolution, which, by superseding 
 the voice of conscience, took away all natural obstacles 
 to crime, and held forth, in a barbarous age, the certain 
 prospect of impunity. 
 
 Although Clovis won a great battle over the Visigoths 
 in Aquitaine, and obtained a nominal dominion over a 
 portion of that province, nevertheless, his kingdom can- 
 not be said to have really extended beyond the Loire. 
 His system, though favourable to conquest, was by no 
 means so to extended sway. Whilst the Gothic and 
 Burgundian chiefs dispersed, and settled on the soil, a 
 considerable portion of which they forced from the na- 
 tive proprietor, the Franks remained in a warlike body, 
 a kind of standing army, about their king. Even if 
 they did scatter and divide, for the greater convenience 
 of pasturage and provision, into winter quarters, in spring 
 they never failed to re-assemble in their Champ de Mars; 
 \ a kind of half parliament, half review, at first use<l for 
 I discussing and arranging plans of conquest. But in time, 
 I as the inferior order of warriors ceased to attend and the 
 \ prelates appeared there in greater numbers and influence, 
 the national assembly gradually came to exercise judicial 
 and legislative functions, to elect sovereigns and officers, 
 and to sanction laws. 
 
 Clovis reigned until the year 511. He had first 
 fixed his residence at Soissons, and was crowned in the 
 cathedral of Rheims. About the middle of his reign he 
 transferred the seat of sovereignty to Paris. Its central 
 situation and security, owing to its being surrounded by 
 the Seine, proved the wisdom of the choice. Clovis 
 ended his days in his new capital, and was buried in the 
 church of St. Genevieve, its patron saint, so honoured 
 for having defended it successfully by her prayers 
 against the menaces of Attila. 
 
 The descendants of Clovis, or the Merovingians, as 
 they are called from Merovee their supposed founder, 
 reigned over the Franks for nearly two centuries and
 
 600. SUCCESSORS OF CLOVIS. 7 
 
 a half. That long period occupies but a brief space in 
 history : its annals offer but a succession of barbarism 
 and crime. From Clovis to Charles Martel, the grand- 
 father of Charlemagne, there existed not a personage 
 worthy of the reader's attention or memory; there is not 
 recorded an event or anecdote which could excite any 
 feeling save disgust. 
 
 Nevertheless, if we were to esteem a nation by its 
 conquests and extent, the empire of the Franks would 
 command our highest consideration. The sons of 
 Clovis subdued Burgundy and Aquitaine, and extended 
 their dominions, with the exception of a small province 
 round Narbonne retained by the Visigoths, to the 
 Pyrenees and the Mediterranean in the south, whilst 
 Switzerland, Bavaria, Saxony, and the German nations 
 as far as the Baltic and the Elbe, acknowledged their 
 authority towards the north. This large empire divided 
 itself naturally into two great portions; Austrasia to the 
 east, Neustria to the west : the former clinging to Ger- 
 man habits, language, and independence; the latter, adopt- 
 ing the tongue and manners of the Romanized Gauls, 
 made great advances in civilisation, whilst it at the same 
 time retrograded, and fell behind its Austrasian neigh- 
 bour in martial spirit, and consequently in political 
 influence and power. The wars, which never ceased to 
 harass France during the reigns of the Merovingians, 
 were kept up principally by the rivalry betwixt these 
 two portions of the empire. In the struggle which 
 preceded and produced the establishment of the race 
 of Charlemagne, the Latin or western portion of 
 France may be considered to have been reconquered 
 by the Germans or Austrasians; and thus a fresh in- 
 fusion of the ruder spirit of the Transrhenane race 
 came to invigorate the already degenerated Franks of 
 Gaul. 
 
 The race of Clovis became effete from gross licen- 
 tiousness, and was thinned by mutual slaughter. As is 
 the case with the Turks of the present day, the first act 
 of a monarch was to put to death his brothers, uncles, 
 B 4s
 
 8 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 752. 
 
 and nephews. Consanguinity, instead of being a bond 
 of attachment, was the cause of a deadly and always 
 fatal enmity. Such a succession of murders naturally 
 produced the reigns of kings under age. Monarchs or 
 monarchs' sons could not long escape the sword of the 
 assassin : whilst to intrust an infant king to the care of one 
 of his own race, or of royal blood, even if such survived, 
 was to deliver him to certain destruction. Hence came 
 the necessity of electing regents amongst the Frank 
 chiefs. The office fell to the only magistrate or mini- 
 ster existing in that rude state of society. This was the 
 mord-dom, or major domus, as it is rendered in Latin, 
 who was at once a royal judge and a kind of steward of 
 the household. At one time appointed by the king, at 
 another chosen by the aristocracy, the major domus, or 
 mayor of the palace, soon became more formidable than 
 the monarch himself. And when, during a long minority, 
 he had legally exercised the royal functions, the mayor 
 found it not difficult to prolong his power by reducing 
 his ward and sovereign to imbecility, through physical 
 indulgence and the absence of education, as well as by 
 other obvious arts calculated to strengthen his own per- 
 sonal influence. The family of Pepin succeeded in 
 rendering the office hereditary in their race, and long 
 wielded the power, without assuming the name and 
 honours, of royalty. These belonged to the race chevelue, 
 the long-haired race, as the descendants of Clovis were 
 called, from the custom of never cutting the locks of the 
 young princes. In the year 752, Pepin at length threw 
 off the mask, dethroned Childeric III., the roi faineant 
 or mock king of the moment, and the last of the Mero- 
 vingians, and caused himself to be crowned in the pre- 
 sence of the assembled nation. As his right, Pepin 
 pleaded the long possession of all the realities of regal 
 power in his family : to this he added the free election 
 of his countrymen ; but, above all, he relied upon a bull 
 issued by pope Zachary, which declared him the legiti- 
 mate monarch of the Franks. It was upon this occasion 
 that the popes first assumed that usurped right, which
 
 752. PEPIX. 9 
 
 they afterwards so used and abused, of throning and de- 
 throning kings. 
 
 Previous to entering upon the reign of Charlemagne, 
 that great epoch from whence modern history dates, it 
 is advisable to take a brief view of that new state of 
 society, then in its infant growth, which, in the prodi- 
 gious development that ourselves and our fathers have 
 witnessed, so differed from, and so surpassed, that of all 
 preceding ages. We shall thus afford the reader a 
 clew which may guide him through the perplexed mazes 
 of fact and event give him a scale by which he can 
 mark the progress of society and make him acquainted 
 with those hidden springs of action, which can be ob- 
 served in masses of men as well as in individuals. 
 
 Four chief powers will be found, on examination, to 
 influence and divide political society, thejdngjy^ the 
 sacerdotal, the aristocratic, and the democratic. The 
 necessary limits~oT this worlc will not allow space to prove 
 
 \ the justice and accuracy of this division, or to explain the 
 
 \ foundation of its principles in human nature. In the re- 
 cords of antiquity we can never find the example of a state 
 in which these powers were all and separately developed. 
 In very remote times, the regal and sacerdotal jpowers 
 were most generally united, or subject one to the other ; 
 !"^uhited, as in the race of the caliphs; royalty subject to 
 the priesthood, as in ancient Egypt, and vice versa, as 
 many examples show. In the oriental monarchies, of 
 
 1 :ancient as of modern times, democracy is of course null ; 
 
 ; ; aristocracy, deprived of hereditary rights, but an ephe- 
 meral and insecure distinction. 
 
 In the republics of Greece and Rome society took 
 
 V another course. Royalty was abolished; the sacerdotal 
 ^ power was united and rendered subservient to the pa- 
 trician ; the democratic itself was much less in action 
 than we are given to suppose. In the palmy days of the 
 Roman and Athenian republics, when the lands of Italy 
 and Attica were cultivated, and almost solely inhabited 
 by slaves, the free and privileged citizens of the common-
 
 10 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 752. 
 
 wealth can scarcely be regarded in any other light than 
 in that of a dominant and cruel aristocracy. Their 
 poverty, their moblike character and attributes, cannot 
 save them from the odious appellation. 
 
 In Europe, and in modern times alone, were the four 
 principles fully and separately developed, and the classes 
 which they respectively animate raised into independent 
 existence. From the balance of power kept up between 
 these, their mutual jealousies, alliances, collisions, have 
 principally arisen the superior civilisation and policy of 
 Europe. Such is the great characteristic that distin- 
 guishes modern from ancient society. It is the great 
 fact to be borne in mind the great key for solving many 
 a political problem. 
 
 If it be asked, why these natural principles of social 
 amelioration lay, some of them at least, dormant in 
 ancient, whilst they were completely developed only in 
 modern times ; the answer is, there was one great cause 
 producing, but many minor ones aiding. The new 
 world certainly profited by the example of the old. Tra- 
 ditions of liberty, of law, and of social order, floated 
 down from the wreck of Roman greatness to dark 
 and barbarous times, when they were gathered, and 
 helped to build up the fabric of a new state. From the 
 forests of Germany, too, and the savage life of hunter 
 and pastor, the invading tribes themselves brought the 
 germs of more political wisdom than could have been 
 hoped for, those of monarchy without despotism, of 
 allegiance without the sacrifice of personal independ- 
 ence. But the great and leading cause, which an- 
 tiquity may be said to have wanted altogether, was 
 Christianity. 
 
 No doubt the Christian religion, having man for its 
 agent, has been accompanied by many evils, and has 
 been perverted to grievous abuses ; but the observer of 
 history, amidst the many crimes and ills which he will 
 have to lay to the charge of some of the agents in its 
 promotion, cannot avoid at the same time confessing
 
 768. EFFECTS OF CHRISTIANITY. 11 
 
 that, even when so perverted, it still was productive of 
 inestimable and often unperceived good ; and that to it 
 principally, above all other causes, is owing the superior 
 state of modern morals, liberty, and civilisation. This 
 is an assertion of which the proofs must be sought in the 
 ensuing pages. But we may anticipate so far as to observe, 
 that had Christianity done no more than to war with 
 polygamy and slavery, as it did, to the abolition of both, 
 it would fully deserve the praise here bestowed. Nothing 
 contributed so much to change the face of Europe, and 
 to bestow upon it its present benign and happy aspect, 
 as the raising of one half of mankind to their natural 
 equality and rights, and by the same act rescuing the 
 other from the inhumanity and barbarism ever charac- 
 terising the despotic masters of their fellow-men. The 
 abolition of slavery, without effecting which it would 
 have been idle preaching against polygamy, instantly 
 raised woman in the scale of being. From this alone^ 
 sprung all the virtues of chivalry, whilst those of pri- 
 vate and domestic life were created anew. It was then 
 that a brighter charm spread around the hearth, that 
 a genius came to preside over it, as far superior to the 
 dumb, dull lares of antiquity, as the worship of the 
 invisible God was to their pagan sacrifices. 
 
 We have seen what great use both Pepin and Clovis 
 Biade of the church in establishing their power. It was 
 the church alone that could then enable royalty to lift 
 itself on the shoulders of the aristocracy. Charles, sur- 
 named the Great, and better known under the appella- 
 tion of Charlemagne, succeeded to his father Pepin in 
 "the year 768, at first conjointly with his brother Carlo- 
 man, whose death, which took place soon after, left the 
 elder brother sole monarch of the Franks. The first act 
 of Charles showed the warrior eager for conquest. He 
 raised an army, and advanced with it beyond the Loire. 
 For centuries barbarism had been continually making 
 war upon civilisation, conquering, destroying, or blend- 
 ing with it. The contest was not yet over, the amalgam-
 
 12 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 770." 
 
 ation not perfect. The rude Austrasians of the Rhine had 
 lately subdued the more polite Neustrians of the banks of 
 the Seine. But Aquitaine and the southern provinces 
 were, with respect to Neustria, what Neustria had been 
 to Austrasia, far more civilised and Latinised ; and the 
 hate on one side equalled the desire of conquest and 
 domination on the other. Pepin .had vanquished the 
 Aquitanians. Upon his death they rebelled, rallying 
 round one of the family of their ancient dukes. But the 
 courage of the southerns failed before the approach of 
 Charles and his northern army ; their troops dispersed, 
 and their chief remained a prisoner. Charles, ere he 
 retired, built the strong castle of Fronsac, on the banks of 
 the Dordogne, and garrisoned it, to keep the malcontent 
 province in subjection. The Franks had hitherto a 
 hatred of towns, and a contempt of fortifications. This 
 is the first instance amongst them of dominating a 
 country by means of a fortress, and marks how advanced 
 were the views of Charles beyond those of his time. 
 
 Charlemagne's next enemies were the Saxons the most 
 formidable and obstinate that he encountered during his 
 reign. For the present, however, after a successful 
 campaign in their wild country, his attention was called 
 away towards Italy, where his conquests and alliances 
 produced events as important in their consequences, per- 
 haps, as any to be found in modern history. 
 
 If we contemplate the church from the fall of the Ro- 
 man empire, we shall perceive that in the dark ages its 
 struggle was unceasingly for dominion, authority, and 
 wealth. Unable, perhaps, to make the barbarians feel 
 the superiority of their sacred character, of their creed, 
 and the morals that they taught by eloquence or argu- 
 ment alone, the priesthood felt it requisite to gain 
 temporal power, in order that their spiritual influence 
 might be greater and more salutary. Some wealth was 
 certainly necessary for them, as was some power. But 
 this portion proved but a bait for the avarice and violence 
 of the barbarians, and could only be rendered secure by
 
 77*. CHARLEMAGNE. 15 
 
 its being rendered equal or superior to that possessed by 
 the lay aristocracy. 
 
 As Rome was considered superior to all western cities, 
 so was its bishop placed above other bishops. An im- 
 perial edict sanctioned this supremacy, which the 
 Romanists vainly seek to found upon the text of the 
 Gospel. Like other prelates, the pope endeavoured to 
 support his spiritual authority by temporal power; but 
 whilst their position allowed them only to acquire ter- 
 ritorial wealth and judicial independence, he aimed at 
 sovereignty. When the head of the empire abandoned 
 or was driven from the dominion which he exercised 
 over Rome, as over other cities, the bishops, from the 
 absence of other magistrates, and the total ruin of 
 respectable families, laid hold of the authority thus 
 abdicated, and ruled as delegates or inheritors of the 
 imperial rights. Such was the claim put forth by the 
 early popes. They aimed at sovereignty not only in 
 Rome, but in the Imperial province or Exarchate, as the 
 territory attached to Ravenna was called. The Lom- 
 bard kings, however, sternly resisted these claims ; and 
 themselves, or their vassals, the dukes of Nepi or Spo- 
 leto, were in the habit of plundering, enslaving, of 
 making or unmaking pontiffs, according as their interest 
 prompted, or the fortune of war allowed. 
 
 In vain did the popes, with all their sacred cha- 
 racter, struggle against the power of the sword. 
 When Pepin, however, thought fit to apply to Rome 
 for a title to his crown, the prospect of gaining so 
 powerful an ally was eagerly laid hold on. Every wish 
 of Pepin was granted, and in return his aid was ought- 
 against the Lombards. The grateful monarch led an 
 army into Italy, and obliged Astolphus, their king, to 
 yield up not only the territory round Rome, but the 
 Exarchate, to the._pope. We may suppose how reluc- 
 tantly and imperfectly these stipulations were performed, 
 especially after the departure of Pepin, who never after- 
 wards found leisure to turn again his attention or arms 
 towards Italy.
 
 14 HISTORY OP PRANCE. 774. 
 
 After the death of Pepin, the solicitations of the 
 pope were renewed to his son, whose youthful ambition 
 and piety were soon inflamed. Charles summoned his 
 captains to meet him in the spring at Geneva. Under 
 the Merovingians, these assemblies were the Champs de 
 Mars, March being the month of meeting. But as the 
 Franks, from serving on foot, became cavaliers under 
 the second race, the time was changed to May, for the 
 sake of forage, and the assemblies were called Champs 
 de MaL From Geneva, Charlemagne passed the Alps, 
 routing the Lombards, who opposed his passage. Their 
 king, Desiderius, did not dare to meet the German 
 monarch in the open field, but shut himself up in his 
 capital, Pa via. The Franks invested it; but, unskilled 
 in the art of attacking fortified places, they contented 
 themselves with a strict blockade. Whilst it lasted, 
 Charles advanced to visit the ancient seat of empire. 
 He was received by pope Adrian with such honours as 
 were paid to the Patrician or viceroy of the emperors. 
 Every homage and attention were lavished, and Charles 
 gratefully confirmed the gifts of Pepih to the church,. 
 gifts, however, which he considered more in the light 
 of a fief or benefice than as an absolute cession. He 
 then returned to Pavia, which surrendered, together 
 with its king. Thus ended the kingdom of the Lom- 
 bards, and Italy became a province of the empire of the 
 Franks. 
 
 No sooner was Italy conquered, than we find Charle- 
 magne engaged with the Saxons, routing and slaughter- 
 ing their armies, over-running their country, and sum- 
 moning his warriors to the Champ de Mai at Paderborn, 
 and other remote places far within the German borders. 
 Some historians consider this inveterate thirty years' war, 
 which Charlemagne carried on against the Saxons, as 
 proceeding from his hatred of barbarism, and his ardent 
 desire to extend the pale of civilisation. But this is 
 too advanced and statesman-like an idea for the age. 
 It seems to have been more from a wish to propagate 
 Christianity that Charles wielded his sword so ruthlessly
 
 784. CHARLEMAGNE. 15 
 
 against the Saxons. The exploits and example of the 
 Saracens had a great influence over him ; and his wish 
 to rival them is far more manifest in his acts and cha- 
 racter than has been noticed. 
 
 It was long since the Saracens had completed the 
 conquest of Spain, extended their dominions beyond the 
 Pyrenees, and menaced even the empire of the Franks. 
 Charles Martel, the grandfather of Charlemagne, in a 
 bloody victory gained over them near Poitiers, put a 
 final check to the advance of the Saracens in that 
 direction, and introduced the rival nations to the dread 
 and esteem of each other. In that campaign, the Franks 
 
 ; suffered greatly from the light horsemen of the Arabs; 
 and it is very probable that the circumstance led them 
 to adopt the mode of fighting on horseback, which soon 
 
 {after became general, and laid an essential foundation 
 
 I of the chevaleresque spirit. 
 The love of letters, and of those who cultivated them, 
 with the ambition of founding learned institutions, was 
 another trait of Charlemagne's character, caught in part, 
 though not exclusively, from the Saracens. And his 
 system of propagating Christianity by the sword, such 
 as he practised against the Saxons, may be regarded as 
 another principle of conduct and of glory imitated from 
 the warlike votaries of the caliphs. 
 
 The same motive would induce him still more, no 
 doubt, to direct his arms against the Saracens them- 
 selves. Such an expedition he did undertake. In 778, 
 he passed the Pyrenees, took and dismantled the towns 
 of Pampluna and Saragossa, and compelled all the Arab 
 princes of the region to swear fealty to him. On his 
 return across the Pyrenees, nevertheless, they prepared 
 an ambuscade. The Basques and Gascons, more hostile 
 to the Franks than to the Saracens, joined their aid to 
 the latter; and the united forces awaited Charlemagne 
 and his victorious army as they traversed the valley of 
 Roncesvaux. There never was a combat of which his- 
 tory has given so few details, and fable and poesy so 
 many, as that of Roncesvaux. It appears that the
 
 16 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 784-. 
 
 rearguard of Charlemagne was attacked and cut off. 
 With it perished some of his bravest captains, or, as 
 the romancers afterwards called them, his paladins. 
 Amongst them was his nephew, the famous Roland, 
 the hero of Ariosto, precisely chronicled by Eginhard, 
 as prefect of the frontiers of Brittany. The bad success 
 of this expedition inspired Charlemagne with a disgust 
 of warring against the Saracens. Their frontier was 
 far from Charles's Austrasian province on the Rhine, 
 which furnished his best and most attached soldiers, 
 whilst he could expect nothing save disaffection and trea- 
 chery from his subjects of Aquitaine. 
 
 The land of the Saxons bordered, on the contrary, 
 upon his native dominions, and was not far from his 
 chosen capital, Aix-la-Chapelle. This it behoved him 
 to make the centre of his monarchy, and to repel from 
 it by force of arms the dangerous vicinity of pagans and 
 barbarians. Charlemagne had already led two expe- 
 ditions against them. In the first, he had overthrown 
 their great idol, and ruined his temple. In the next, 
 he established fortresses and garrisons, compelling the 
 people to be baptized, and to swear fealty to him. The 
 Saxons, however, were not to be quelled by the same 
 "facile means as the civilised citizens of Gaul. Again 
 and again they rose in insurrection, headed by Witikind, 
 a hero worthy of being the rival of Charlemagne. As 
 long as Witikind found the spirit of independence alive 
 amongst the Saxons, or as often as he could awake it, 
 he led them against the Franks ; and when his van- 
 quished countrymen submitted to the conqueror, he alone 
 disdained to stoop, and fled across the Baltic, from 
 whence he returned more than once to excite the 
 Saxons against Charlemagne. The monarch of the 
 Franks vowed to extirpate the stubborn pagans alto- 
 gether, and for many successive years he wasted their 
 country, that is, its population and cattle, with fire and 
 sword. Even the proud spirit of Witikind was forced 
 to bow before the conqueror ; the Saxon hero appeared 
 at the Champ de Mai, and vowed obedience to Charles.
 
 800 CONQUEST OP THB SAXONS. 17 
 
 The latter, however, could not trust the Saxons. He 
 transported immense numbers of them from the banks 
 of the Elbe to the interior of his dominions, and at the 
 same time divided their country into benefices, which he 
 distributed to his prelates, that the remnant of the 
 Saxons might become Christian as well as subject. 
 
 This is a fit place to mark an important point in 
 Charlemagne's policy. As he conquered himself the 
 greater part of his empire, he had to appoint the rulers 
 or lords of provinces and districts; in other words, 
 counts and dukes. He dreaded the aristocracy, which 
 had raised his family on the ruins of the Merovingians ; 
 and his object was to prevent the great charges of the 
 empire, and the governments of provinces, from be- 
 coming hereditary. He wanted to form a monarchy on 
 the oriental plan, in which the nobles, enjoying privileges 
 attached to their persons, not to their race, were unable 
 to perpetuate and consolidate their power. This plan, 
 obviously tending to despotism, was fortunately frus- 
 trated. Charlemagne's views in this respect led him 
 to lean so much to the church, and to prefer bestowing 
 territorial commands upon prelates rather than upon 
 lay nobles. And the same principle governed both him 
 and Pepin in their Hmaccountable generosity to the pope 
 of Rome. 
 
 The year 800 is the date of a ceremony which, 
 though but a ceremony, and produced in a great mea- 
 sure by accident, has had more influence upon the state 
 of Europe than all the victories of the century. A 
 conspiracy broke out in Rome against pope Leo III. : 
 he was taken prisoner, maltreated, but contrived to 
 escape. He fled for protection to Charlemagne ; and 
 that monarch, receiving the fugitive with his wonted 
 piety, led him back to Rome at the head of an army, 
 reinstated him, and took vengeance upon his enemies. 
 It was on the following Christmas that Charles, accom- 
 panied by his court and an immense assemblage, heard 
 mass performed by Leo in the church of St. Peter's. At 
 its conclusion, the pope advanced in procession towards 
 
 VOL. i. c
 
 18 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 814. 
 
 the monarch, placed on his head a crown of gold, and 
 saluted him by the titles of Emperor and Augustus. 
 Thus was the empire of the west restored in the person 
 of Charlemagne. The Frank was seated on the throne 
 of the Caesar. Nor was the ceremony, as we might 
 deem it, an idle pomp; it gave rights and dignity and 
 power. Precedent and authority were the only logic of 
 the age ; and the magic of a name, not without influence 
 in this day, was all-powerful in that. No very con- 
 siderable event afterwards occurred to mark the declin- 
 ing years of Charlemagne. He died in 814, at Aix-la- 
 Chapelle, and was buried in the famous Munster or 
 cathedral which he had founded. 
 
 Charlemagne was a man of extraordinary mind and 
 powers. To the characteristics of a hero and a con- 
 queror, he united those of a monarch and legislator. 
 In an age when the monastic virtues had superseded all 
 others, he alone made those of the statesman temper 
 them ; and though so devoid of early education as to be 
 unable to write, he supplied the defect by study through- 
 out the whole course of his busy reign, and became a 
 judge and a patron of letters at a time when the taste 
 seemed utterly extinct save in him. Three hundred 
 years were yet to elapse ere chivalr^ was to flourish, 
 and yet Charlemagne anticipated its spirit ; and the 
 romancers of after time had recourse to him and to his 
 paladins as the fittest models of knightly conduct and 
 chivalrous valour. 
 
 The descendants of Charlemagne shall here be treated 
 with as little notice as those of Clovis. Both degene- 
 rated, and were trampled under foot by the aristocracy. 
 But the changes which the nation underwent during the 
 reign of the Carlovingians are far better known, and far 
 more important. There is this peculiar character in their 
 history; that personages and incidents, with one excep- 
 tion, that of Hollo and the cession of Normandy, are 
 utterly unattractive, whilst the silent progress of society 
 offers a picture full of interest. We can afford to take 
 but a cursory glance at the latter.
 
 841. SUCCESSORS OP CHARLEMAGNE. 19 
 
 There is no political truth more fully known and 
 admitted, than that slaves and freemen cannot continue 
 long to form together the labouring class of the com- 
 munity. Universally, in a generation or two, the free- 
 men disappear ; the slaves alone remain upon the soil. 
 Such was the case under the successors of Clovis. The 
 conquests of Charlemagne spread a new race of freemen 
 over the face of Gaul : under his successors they gra- 
 dually disappeared. Compelled to join the army at 
 their own expense, unprotected from violence, as slaves 
 were, by a powerful master, and disdaining those agri- 
 cultural occupations practised by bondsmen, the freeman 
 soon abandoned his little property, or saw it wrested 
 from him by force. Most generally he perished, or 
 perhaps was sold to pay off the weight of fines which 
 his poverty forced him to incur. 
 
 Of the class of freemen the armies of Charlemagne 
 were composed. There remained still sufficient to carry 
 on the civil wars betwixt his grandchildren : between 
 them the battle of Fontenay was fought in 841, in which 
 forty thousand men are said to have perished ; and all 
 the historians of the time agree that the whole force of 
 France perished with them. Henceforward the Nor- 
 mans and Saracens^ met nowhere with resistance, and 
 the entire kingdom was exposed defenceless to pillage. 
 How was this ? The surviving population, excepting 
 the class of prelates and nobles, were serfs and villains, 
 and consequently forbidden and unused to bear arms. 
 The state was without a defender, the melancholy and 
 inevitable consequence of slavery. 
 
 The lesser aristocracy also had greatly decayed. The 
 equal division of property amongst brethren provetLaearly 
 as destructive to the noble as to the monarch. In the 
 mifl{ne~"of the ninth century, the church stood alone 
 unimpaired, and seemed at once to be possessed of all 
 property as of all power. The kings, however, inhe- 
 rited the right, tenaciously held and exercised by Charle- 
 magne, of appointing the superior governors, or dukes 
 and counts of provinces. In the reigns of his weak 
 c 2
 
 20 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 850. 
 
 successors, and principally in that of Charles the Bald, 
 his grandson, the sovereign, in order to gain the support 
 of the leading nobles against his competitors, found it 
 necessary to abandon to them their commands, with 
 hereditary rights thereto. Here the system of Charle- 
 magne, and of the old and oriental monarchies, was 
 departed from, and an hereditary aristocracy formed, 
 possessed, each in his county, of all the attributes of 
 sovereignty, and wanting nothing but the name. 
 
 Previously to this, the proprietors of the provinces 
 held their lands of the monarch, and professed allegiance 
 exclusively to him ; but now, the dukes and counts 
 came to stand in the royal place. Finding a great por- 
 tion of the lands destitute of cultivators, owing to the 
 devastations of the Normans, they distributed them to 
 their followers, demanding in return personal allegiance 
 to themselves rather than to the common sovereign. 
 Thus were formed the sub-infeodations, the essential 
 principle of the new political state, the fibre, as we 
 may say, which soon grew forth into the vast body of 
 the feudal system. 
 
 The feeble characters of the Carlovingian monarchs, 
 together with those frequent partitions and exchanges 
 of territory amongst them, which prevented any power 
 from being consolidated in their hands, or any feeling 
 of loyalty from taking root in the bosoms of the people, 
 was the chief cause of their fall, and of the weakness 
 which abandoned their rights to the possessors of the 
 great fiefs. The frequent invasions of the Normans 
 contributed powerfully, however, towards the same 
 effect. 
 
 Almost from the reign of the Antonines to that of 
 Charlemagne, the current of barbaric conquest had con- 
 tinued to overflow the Danube and the Rlu'ne. The 
 great effort of this hero's life was to check its torrent; 
 and he succeeded. For the first time the northern 
 nations became inspired with a dread of the south, and 
 despaired to force their way, by land at least, into the 
 fertile regions where their ancestors had emigrated.
 
 911 ROLLO INVADES FRANCE. 21 
 
 The tide, excluded from its ancient channels, opened 
 new outlets for itself. Denmark andScandinayia haf} 
 been long accustomed to fear a surplusTpopulation, and 
 
 ^^taM^ Mw d0*^MM^ MI HMMMM^M^ MBVMM ^ H ^MWMMHWM^MMd^HMM58MV * 
 
 to eject it upon foreign climes. The way by land was 
 nov,- closed ; the more perilous path of sea lay open, and 
 the barbarians took to it in their rude galleys, every 
 reader of English history knows with what success. 
 Even Charlemagne had the mortification, towards the 
 close of his reign, to hear that two hundred of their 
 vessels had landed their crews on the coast of Friesland, 
 that the province had been ravaged, and the marauders 
 re-embarked ere an army could be mustered to repel or 
 revenge the insult. Under his successors, the Danes or 
 Normans met of course with more success and more 
 impunity. They sailed up the mouths of all the navi- 
 gable rivers, the Rhine, the Seine, the Loire, burning 
 and pillaging all the great towns, laying waste the pro- 
 vinces, and dragging the population along with them. 
 They met with no resistance. The reason has been i 
 previously stated. The inhabitants of the country were j t 
 
 almost all reduced to the servile state, were denied, and , 
 jgnacaat,o the use of arms. 
 
 The absolute*~necessity of resisting these invaders, 
 which the monarch was never equal to, excited at length 
 the efforts and talents of the nobles. They exercised 
 themselves to arms, fortified their dwellings, and made 
 strongholds of them. They converted their serfs into 
 soldiers ; gave them land, with a partial property or 
 durable tenure of it, that they might be more attached 
 to their chiefs, and more interested to defend them. 
 Feudality, in fine, arose ; and, it is to be remarked, 
 principally in the exposed and invaded provinces. All 
 these foundations of it were laid before the conclusion 
 of the ninth century. In the tenth they became conso- 
 lidated. 
 
 In the year 91 1* when Charles the Simple, whose 
 
 name bespeaks his character, reigned in France, the 
 
 celebrated Rolf, or Rollo, sailed up the Seine with 
 
 a numerous navy of Danes or Normans, with the usual 
 
 c 3
 
 22 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 91 1. 
 
 purpose of pillaging and levying contributions. He 
 besieged Paris and Chartres : the word marks the pro- 
 gress that fortifications, and, what is more important, 
 the defence of them, had made ; for formerly the Danes 
 penetrated into every town without resistance. He 
 ravaged even the distant province of Burgundy. Whilst 
 king Charles the Simple sent an archbishop to offer 
 Rollo an entire province of his dominions as the price 
 of peace, Robert, Count of Paris, the ancestor of Hugh 
 Capet and of the present dynasty of France, assembled 
 an army, and attacked the Norman near Chartres. If 
 Rollo gained the victory, it was dearly purchased ; and 
 the circumstance rendered him more inclined to accept 
 the offer of Charles the Simple. He was to possess 
 Normandy as its hereditary duke, swearing allegiance to 
 Charles, and suffering himself to be baptized, with his 
 whole army. After three months' negotiation, Charles 
 and Rollo met upon the banks of the river Epte, the 
 boundary of the future duchy, and the treaty was con- 
 cluded; the French monarch at the same time giving his 
 daughter Gisele in marriage to the Norman duke. The 
 ceremony of swearing allegiance was found to be the 
 only difficulty, Rollo declaring that he would never bow 
 the knee to mortal. One of his followers was ordered, 
 by way of compromise, to perform the humiliating act. 
 The surly Norman obeyed reluctantly ; and in the act of 
 raising the monarch's foot to his mouth, lifted it so 
 rudely and so high as to upset the new liege lord of his 
 master. The Normans on the occasion could not refrain 
 from loud laughter. The French dissembled, passed 
 over the insult, and the treaty was not interrupted. 
 
 Rollo divided the lands of Normandy amongst his 
 principal followers, and demanded of them an oath of 
 .service and allegiance similar to that which Charles had 
 sought of him. These again imitated their chief with 
 respect to their inferiors. Duke Rollo had for advisers 
 the French bishops, whom he had established in his 
 dominions; and they instructed him in all the laws and 
 habits then prevalent in France, which they were natu-
 
 911. DIVISION OP THE EMPIRE. 23 
 
 rally anxious that he should adopt, in preference to the 
 rude and pagan manners of his native land. In the 
 formation of a new state of society, as in that of a new 
 city, order and system could more easily be introduced 
 and observed; and the people, who last received the 
 principles of feudality, first brought them to that regu- 
 larity and perfection, unknown as yet, and afterwards 
 imitated, throughout the rest of France. Thus, as the 
 ravages of the Danish marauders aided most materially in 
 laying the foundations of the feudal system, so their final 
 settlement served to complete and crown the edifice. 
 
 CHAP. II. 
 
 FROM THE ACCESSION OF HUGH CAPET TO THAT OF 
 SAINT LOUIS, 987 1226. 
 
 THE reign of Charlemagne resembles the course of a 
 meteor, which sheds a brilliant light around the heavens 
 for a space, but leaves the darkness still more dreary_as 
 it disappears. Despite the place aricPranF "which it 
 assumes, it is a stranger to the great system athwart 
 which lies its track, and whose progress it may be said 
 more to disturb than promote. Soon after the death of 
 Charlemagne, his large empire fell asunder by its own 
 weight. The mutual antipathies of different and neigh- 
 bouring races seconded the rivalry of the Carlovingian 
 princes. The great division was into the German and 
 the French : the first knit together by their old Teutonic 
 tongue ; the latter nurtured in the mixed language of 
 a race descended from Gaul, Roman, and Barbarian 
 blended. The Meuse, the Saone, and the Rhone, formed 
 the line of demarcation betwixt them. The elder branch 
 of Charlemagne's descendants chose the country east of 
 this, and brought to it the title of Emperor, with all the 
 vague prerogatives attached to the name. The Carlo- 
 vingians lost the throne of Germany, even ere they were 
 driven from that of France. The Germanic habit of 
 c 4
 
 24- HISTORY OF FRANCE. Q12 18. 
 
 holding diets and national assemblies was preserved to 
 the east of the Rhine, whilst it fell into disuse in the 
 west. And there, in consequence, the aristocracy ac- 
 quired a more united and organised system of supe- 
 riority, and succeeded not only in rendering their own 
 rights hereditary, but also in making the monarchy 
 elective. A duke of Franconia, a duke of Saxony, were 
 raised successively to the imperial throne ; and their 
 example emboldened the family of Hugh Capet to usurp 
 the place of the dwindled Carlovingians of France. 
 
 In the reign of Charles the Bald a kind of union was 
 effected, under his sway, of all the countries west of the 
 Meuse and the Rhone. They composed a heterogeneous 
 mass. The link of even a common name applied to the 
 land was wanting. Not only the Carlovingian monarchs, 
 but the Capetians themselves, were long styled kings, 
 not of France, but of the Franks. This circumscribed 
 and ill-united realm it was beyond their power to keep 
 together in obedience to them. A territorial aristo- 
 cracy had every where arisen, by their very nature inde- 
 pendent. Of the great connecting principles of society, 
 neither commerce, nor letters, nor arms, flourished in 
 force sufficient to create general sympathies or interests. 
 Each baron isolated himself in his castle. The life of 
 towns, prevalent in classic times, was exchanged for 
 that of solitude and retirement. With the dignity of 
 the monarch, that of the courtier naturally perished. 
 Power lay in castle and domain. No marvel that the 
 high-born and highly-gifted sought to realise their 
 fortunes, and to erect for themselves, in the provinces, 
 that solid influence which the favour of the monarch 
 could no longer bestow. This is the true cause why 
 those who administered the provinces under Charles the 
 Bald made their several jurisdictions independent ; con- 
 verting rights, in their origin vicarious, into personal 
 and hereditary ones. This final migration of the great 
 nobles from the court to the provinces, bringing with 
 them all the regal attributes of high judicial, financial, 
 and administrative power, was the last blow given to
 
 987- PROVINCIAL NOBLES. 25 
 
 royalty, and reduced it to the empty prerogative of a 
 name. Yet we shall soon see this degraded principle 
 of authority gradually rise, gathering strength from its 
 unity and fixedness of purpose, so superior in influence 
 to the separated and distracted powers of the nobles ; 
 gradually attracting to itself their waifs, whether of 
 privileges or property ; rallying around it, now the 
 clergy, now the people ; and chiefly supporting itself 
 upon that reverence " which doth hedge a king," 
 on that mysterious and superstitious feeling of loyalty, : 
 which, if unabused, so naturally takes root in the bosoms 
 of a people. 
 
 The period of two hundred and forty yearSj 
 from the accession of Hugh Capet to that of St. 
 Louis, is described by Sismondi as " a long in- 
 terregnum, during which the authority of king was 
 extinct, although the name continued to subsist." A 
 history of France, during this period, is a history, not 
 of its monarch, but of its nobles. And as yet these 
 details are neither heroic nor important enough to be 
 interesting. A duke had sprung up in Aquitaine, a 
 king in Provence. The establishment of the Norman 
 princes has already been narrated. Betwixt- them and 
 Aquitaine, Anjou obeyed a warlike count. To the 
 north, the first Baldwin possessed the County of Flanders 
 betwixt the Somme and the Meuse. The Duchy of Bur- 
 gundy was formed in the east; whilst that of Lorraine 
 was altogether independent of France, and held by 
 tongue as well as regime to the empire of Germany. 
 Taking away these provinces from the map of France, 
 a central portion will be found to remain betwixt the 
 Loire and the Flemish border. Even here, however, the 
 last Carlovingians possessed scarcely a castle which they 
 could call their own. The Counts of Paris possessed 
 that city, as well as Orleans. The Counts of Verman- 
 doisTwhose capital was St. Quentin, at this time ruled 
 Champagne also ; but soon after that province came to 
 increase the territories of the Counts of Blois. The 
 only town that obeyed the last reigning descendants of
 
 26 HISTORY OF PRANCE. 987- 
 
 Charlemagne was Laon, and here they usually resided, 
 unless when obliged to take refuge at Rheims, under the 
 protection of the archbishop, against the attacks of the 
 surrounding nobles. 
 
 Of this dominant and independent aristocracy, the 
 most fortunately placed, if not the most powerful, was 
 the Count of Paris. The family had always distinguished 
 itself. Robert the Strong, its supposed founder, had 
 combated the Normans when every other Frank fled at 
 their approach. Eudes had defended Paris against them 
 during a year's siege ; and such was the renown ac- 
 quired by the feat, that he was crowned king during the 
 minority of Charles the Simple. It seems as if this 
 new dignity diminished rather than increased the power 
 of the Counts of Paris, by the envy and enmity which 
 it excited. For when Hugues, of the same family, 
 might with equal ease have worn the crown, he preferred 
 bestowing it upon Louis, surnamed Outre-mer, a boy 
 of Carlovingian blood. In the next generation the 
 family grew more powerful. The eldest brother pos- 
 sessed the duchy of Burgundy; the second, Hugh Capet, 
 was Count of Paris and Orleans; whilst their sister, mar- 
 ried to the Duke of Normandy, secured the friendship 
 of that powerful prince. Louis V., or le Faineant, held 
 the title of king of Laon. He was without offspring; 
 whilst his uncle, Charles, the sole heir of Carlovingian 
 rights, held the duchy of Lorraine of the emperor, and 
 might be supposed a stranger to France and to its suc- 
 cession. In 987, Louis died at Compiegne, poisoned, it 
 is said, by his wife. As history is silent as to the cause, 
 conjecture ha's attributed the crime to the ambition of 
 Hugh Capet. That noble took advantage of the oppor- 
 tunity, assembled some of his compeers at Noyon, where 
 the form of an election was gone through in his favour, 
 and soon after Hugh caused himself to be crowned in 
 the cathedral of Rheims. 
 
 Charles of Lorraine, though thus prevented of his rights, 
 was neither friendless nor vanquished. He soon took 
 forcible possession of Laon and of Rheims, from which
 
 987- HVGH CAPET. 27 
 
 Hugh Capet was unable to drive him by forte of arms. 
 He adroitly, however, contrived to attach to his interests 
 Ascelin, bishop of Laon, whom Charles, somewhat mis- 
 trusting, kept "with him at Rheims. A conspiracy, 
 formed by Ascelin, was attended with complete success. 
 Charles was seized in his bed, and, together with his 
 nephew, the archbishop of Rheims, delivered over to 
 Hugh Capet. That monarch placed his prisoners in 
 confinement at Orleans, where his competitor, Charles of 
 Lorraine, soon after died. 
 
 These, if we except a long quarrel respecting the 
 archbishopric of Rheims, are the sole events of the reign 
 of Hugh Capet, which is supposed to have occupied 
 nine years. Some modern historians regard the founder 
 of the third dynasty of French monarchs as a hero 
 and a master spirit, whose talents won for him a crown. 
 Others, amongst whom is Sismondi, represent him as 
 a pious sluggard, indebted to fortune solely for his eleva- 
 tion. Both are in extreme. We see no proofs of his 
 heroism. But his was an iron age, in which the ex- 
 ertions of individuals had slight power in changing the 
 course of events. Nor does it follow that, because he 
 was pious, he w r as pusillanimous. He made war on the 
 Count of Montreuil, to recover the relics of St. Riquier, 
 which that Count had stolen. Hugh Capet compelled 
 him to surrender them, and bore himself the venerable 
 remains on his royal shoulders to the abbey of the 
 saint. Such is the account of the chroniclers. But if 
 we observe that Hugh at the same time built and forti- 
 fied Abbeville, the monarch will not seem altogether 
 sunk in the superstitious votary. 
 
 " Who made thee Count ? " demanded Hugh Capet 
 of a refractory noble, supposed by some to be Talleyrand, 
 Count of Angouleme. " The same right that made 
 thee king," was the bold reply. Such was the mea- 
 sure of the new monarch's authority. The great feud- 
 atories, in consenting to place the crown on one of 
 .their own body, thought less of his elevation than of 
 humbling the throne. Their views were sound, if they
 
 28 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 
 
 considered but themselves, short-sighted, if they looked 
 forward to posterity. Feudality ascended the throne 
 with Hugh Capet; and, despite the precautions or inten- 
 tions of the founders, the head of so powerful a system 
 could not long remain powerless himself. Organised as 
 society now was in regular and successive gradations of 
 inferior and superior, a supreme chief became necessary 
 to complete the whole. There was something wanting 
 to crown the structure. The nobles imagined to adorn 
 it with the lifeless image of royalty. But their sta- 
 tue, like Pygmalion's, took life as it became the object of 
 veneration, and grew at length to wield its sceptre with 
 a muscular arm. 
 
 Hugh Capet had taken the precaution to have his son 
 crowned and consecrated during his own lifetime. 
 Thus, on the demise of the former, Robert found him- 
 self the undisputed king of France. The young monarch 
 was one of those soft, domestic tempers which fate so 
 often misplaces on a throne. He had married Bertha, 
 the widow of the Count of Blois, and was tenderly at- 
 tached to her. The spouses had the misfortune to be 
 distantly related, and Robert had been godfather to one 
 of Bertha's children by her former husband. The pope 
 considered these circumstances sufficient to render the 
 marriage incestuous ; and he accordingly issued a com- 
 mand to Robert, desiring him to put away Bertha, 
 under pain of excommunication. The popes had erected 
 themselves into the censors of princes, and they were 
 especially rigid in prohibiting the marriage of cousins. 
 Such unions, they said, drew down divine vengeance, and 
 were to be avoided, lest they should produce national ca- 
 lamities. Nor was this mere superstition on their part : 
 it had its policy. It was chiefly by intermarriages that the 
 great aristocracy at this time increased their territories 
 and influence. Every obstacle thrown in the way of 
 these alliances consequently checked the growth of their 
 exorbitant might ; every difficulty or scruple, being in 
 the power of the pontiff alone to remove, brought con- 
 siderable advantage, both in revenue and respect, to the
 
 1031. ROBERT THE WISE. 29 
 
 holy see. Robert struggled for four or five years in be- 
 half of his legitimate wife, against the terrors of excom- 
 munication ; but he was at length compelled to yield, to 
 chase poor Bertha from his presence, and to take another 
 wife, Constance, the daughter of the Count of Toulouse. 
 With her, a woman of more spirit than her predecessor, 
 Robert was less happy. The monarch dreaded her, 
 and was even obliged to do his alms in secret for fear 
 of her reproof. His chief amusement was the singing 
 and composing of psalms, to which the musical taste of 
 that age was confined. In a pilgrimage to Rome, Ro- 
 bert left a sealed paper on the altar of the apostles. The 
 priesthood expected it to contain a magnificent donation, 
 and were not little surprised and disappointed to find 
 it to contain but a hymn of the monarch's composition. 
 The piety of Robert was most exemplary. He was 
 anxious to save his subjects from the crime of perjury : 
 the means he took were, to abstract privately the holy 
 relics from the cases which contained them, and on 
 which people were sworn. He substituted an ostrich's 
 egg, as an innocent object, incapable of taking vengeance 
 on the false swearer. 
 
 Such are the facts which we have to relate of a reign 
 of nearly thirty-five years. The good king Robert slum- 
 bered on his throne, with a want of vigour and capacity, 
 that would have caused a monarch of the first two races 
 to totter from his seat, or at least would have transferred 
 his authority to some minister or powerful duke. The 
 Capetians as yet, however, unlike the Carlovingians, had 
 neither power nor prerogative to tempt the ambition of 
 an usurper. The very title of king was unenvied. And 
 whilst the sovereign led the choir at St. Denis, France 
 was not the less vigorously governed by its independent 
 and feudal nobility. 
 
 The obstinacy of the pope in breaking the marriages 
 of princes produced its natural consequences on the 
 death of Robert. Henry, known as the First of France, 
 was that monarch's son by Bertha, and had been 
 crowned in the lifetime of his father. Constance, how-
 
 30 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1037. 
 
 ever, attached to her own son Robert, made a league 
 with Eudes, Count of Champagne, and offered him half 
 the town of Sens for his assistance against Henry. The 
 circumstance marks the limit of the duchy of France. 
 Henry, unable to resist so powerful a noble, fled with 
 only twelve companions to the protection of Robert, 
 Duke of Normandy. The Duke furnished the young 
 king with an army, which soon reduced Constance and 
 her supporter to submit and make peace. Henry I. 
 took possession of his circumscribed kingdom, ceding 
 in fief to his brother Robert the duchy of Burgundy, 
 and to the Duke of Normandy, as the price of his 
 aid, a territory called the Vexin, comprised between the 
 Oise and the Epte; thus bringing the Norman frontier 
 within a few leagues of Paris. The Vexin proved after- 
 wards the great subject of contention betwixt the Norman 
 dukes and their sovereign. 
 
 Thus settled on his throne, Henry, like his father 
 Robert, sunk into quiet and insignificance. The Count 
 of Champagne, Eudes, eclipsed and overshaded the mo- 
 narch, who was unable to drive him from Sens. Eudes 
 sustained a long war with the emperor, as a pretender to 
 the throne of Aries and Provence. And when the nobles 
 of Lombardy came to France in search of a sovereign, 
 they made offer of their crown, not to Henry, but to 
 Eudes. Yet, despite of the feebleness both of their 
 power and character, the French monarchs already 
 drew to them a greater share of respect. Henry made 
 war upon the Count of Champagne, and afterwards 
 upon young William the Bastard, Duke of Normandy. 
 His warlike efforts could make no impression on those 
 powerful feudatories : and yet Eudes never attempted 
 to retaliate. The Norman duke, though he routed and 
 slaughtered one of the royal armies, refrained from 
 attacking that which the monarch commanded in person. 
 The feudal system had grown to its full vigour : its 
 laws were established in superstition as well as custom; 
 and it was considered both impolitic and impious for a 
 vassal to war, without flagrant cause of injustice, against
 
 1037- HENRY THE FIRST. 31 
 
 his suzerain. Thus the feudal creed and institutions 
 raised a protecting fence around the feeble plant of 
 royalty, and so enabled it to attain that maturity and 
 height which were hereafter to suffice for its own exist- 
 ence and defence. 
 
 This new growth of the monarchic principle, how- 
 ever, had at this time scarce raised itself from the ground. 
 Like a well-born infant, it inspired at most a tender 
 respect. It had neither authority nor influence : these 
 the aristocracy had for a century monopolized. The 
 power of the nobles alone flourished or subsisted in the 
 state. The church first rose to combat them ; and this 
 epoch the reigns of Robert and Henry marks the 
 commencement of the struggle. In the rude tenth cen- 
 tury, the priesthood had been completely trodden down. 
 Duke and baron and chevalier had usurped their 
 lands, seized churches and convents, and appropriated to 
 themselves the right of presentation at least, which they 
 sold or bartered, when one of their own family did not 
 hold the benefice. The national clergy was utterly 
 unable to withstand their powerful lay brethren. The 
 crown, their natural protector, was not in a condition to 
 aid them. In this state of helplessness they looked to 
 the pope of Rome for support. There they applied 
 thither they appealed. In rallying round the chair of 
 the Roman pontiff they saw the only hopes of rescuing 
 themselves, their remaining property and privileges, 
 from the hands of the nobles. From near and temporal 
 tyranny, they appealed to the far and the spiritual. 
 The popes took advantage of the movement, and soon 
 erected thereon their supreme and infallible authority. 
 To effect this great end, they left no means unemployed. 
 War was declared against simony ; councils were held ; 
 prelates deposed; and all the thunders of the church 
 dealt forth on whoever traded in or usurped ecclesiastical 
 benefices. The formation of an electoral college of car- 
 dinals secured the papal chair itself from the influence 
 of the emperors. The celibacy of the clergy was at the 
 same time preached and enjoined, in order to separate
 
 32 HISTOBY OF FRANCE. 1037. 
 
 them still more from worldly and local interests, and to 
 unite the church into a compact body, such as might vie 
 with feudality itself. The priesthood throughout Europe, 
 who, had they been independent and uninjured at the 
 beginning of the eleventh century, would have been 
 inclined to resist the growing authority of their superior 
 of Rome, in the then dire and spoliated state of the 
 church seconded it with all their might. Royalty was 
 unable to struggle against it, except in Germany, where 
 it did so with very doubtful success. The nobility, 
 scattered, ignorant, and engaged in mutual hostilities, 
 though able to plunder the ecclesiastics of their district, 
 could offer to the united force of the hierarchy but feeble 
 and partial points of resistance. The papal see, like 
 Briareus, attacked them with an hundred arms. Vice- 
 gerent of celestial power, it held out in either hand 
 salvation and perdition. Absolution and anathema were 
 both in its gift. Frequent miracles were made to sanction 
 its divine authority ; so frequent, indeed, that the pious 
 frauds of that age resuscitated the belief and practice of 
 magic. Having thus formed for itself such an arsenal 
 of arms as no power could oppose, the Roman see 
 framed such a moral code as called for and necessitated 
 their use. Man's natural conscience, with its simple 
 teachings and its unerring warnings, was superseded; 
 the Gospel, so harmonious with its voice, was set aside ; 
 and the obsolete canons of Judaism, with the arbitrary 
 glossings of an ill-informed and interested body of men, 
 substituted in its stead. 
 
 On such foundations, by such accidents and means, 
 did the Romish church raise up the bulwarks of its 
 authority. The priesthood are not, more than any 
 body of men, to be accused of universal selfishness. 
 The intentions of early pontiffs were no doubt good, 
 pious, and philanthropic. In putting a curb in the 
 mouth and a bar in the way of the aristocracy, they 
 produced the best effects upon the prospects of Europe. 
 A pity it was, that in the combat they found it necessary 
 to lay waste and to prostrate the minds of men, as tern-
 
 1037- POWER OF THE CHURCH. 33 
 
 poral tyrants did to ravage their properties and enslave 
 their persons. Certain it is, that they corrupted the 
 sources both of rational and moral sense. They removed 
 and destroyed the very landmarks of reason, that they 
 themselves might be the only and arbitrary meters of 
 it. They rendered right undistinguishable from wrong ; 
 truth from falsehood and administered, by way of an- 
 tidotes to incredulity, the deadliest poisons of bigotry 
 and superstition. 
 
 These accusations should, perhaps, instead of being 
 directed against one class, be extended to man and to the 
 age. The church then took upon itself the difficult and 
 ungrateful task of legislating and improving, which, in 
 our own times, is not accomplished with any wonderful 
 degree of either enlightenment or disinterestedness. And, 
 perhaps, if we consider attentively the legislators and 
 moralists of later days, we shall feel less entitled to 
 declaim against the ecclesiastical sins and errors of the 
 past. 
 
 Still, the means employed by the priesthood of this 
 century to subdue and to rule mankind were pernicious 
 and unjust. The ends they had in view were far 
 otherwise ; and the first use which they made of their 
 new power proves it. This was to establish the Treve 
 de Dieu, or Truce of God ; by which some check was 
 put to the unceasing warfare of the nobles, some res- 
 pite and security procured for the unfortunate pea- 
 santry. From Wednesday at sunset till sunrise on 
 Monday it was ordained that all military operations 
 and acts of violence should cease. Feast days were 
 included amongst those devoted to peace, as well as 
 the long intervals of fast and penitence which occur 
 in the Romish church. The persons of all professing 
 a religious life were rendered sacred ; and, what per- 
 haps shows the humanity and wisdom of the measure 
 more than any of the regulations, all implements of hus- 
 bandry were put under the protection of the truce. In 
 any case it was forbidden to destroy them. These laws, 
 
 VOL. I. D
 
 34 HISTORY OF FRANCE, 
 
 promulgated by the clergy, were enforced under pain of 
 excommunication ; and for a certain time they proved 
 effectual in restraining the violence of the nohles. Even 
 when the Truce of God was forgotten, it left behind 
 some principles of national or military law. It first 
 taught the soldier to blend humanity with courage, 
 generosity with daring ; and accustomed men to observe 
 eome rules of justice, even in hours and acts of violence. 
 Chivalry soon after took up these maxims, which the 
 clergy were not fully able to enforce ; and the gallant 
 sons of the aristocracy gave their aid in repressing the 
 most flagrant abuses of the supremacy of their order. 
 
 Henry I. died in the year 1060. He had married 
 Anne, a Russian princess ; apparently determined to 
 allow the pope no cause of spiritual warfare against 
 him. For, had he espoused a French wife, he could 
 never be certain that she was not related to him in some 
 distant yet forbidden degree. 
 
 Henry was succeeded by his son Philip I., who 
 was but seven years of age when he began to reign. 
 Baldwin, Count of Flanders, had married king Henry's 
 sister, and was left guardian to the infant; a charge which 
 he honourably and successfully filled. The minority of 
 Philip was marked by a most important event the con- 
 quest of England by William, Duke of Normandy. For 
 the English reader, it is here sufficient to indicate its 
 date. With this exception, there is scarcely an event 
 in the first thirty-five years of the reign of Philip that 
 demands attention. Whilst the Normans were laying 
 the foundations of their sway in England, the famous 
 Hildebrand, who had been pope under the titJe of 
 Gregory VII., was establishing the papal supremacy ; and 
 the long and important quarrel betwixt pontiff and 
 emperor was then commencing. Philip, whose scanty 
 revenues obliged him to retain and convert to his own 
 use the ecclesiastical revenues of his duchy wherever 
 pretext or opportunity was afforded, was often, during 
 that time, the object of the invectives and menaces of 
 the imperious pontiff. But the French king fortunately
 
 1069- P11IMP THE FIRST. 35 
 
 knew how to temporise and yield, and so avoided the 
 misfortunes of his cotemporary the emperor Henry IV. 
 From the reign of Philip dates an important change 
 in the manners and feelings of the French. For cen- 
 turies back the general tendency of nations and of pro- 
 vinces, as of individuals, had been to isolate, to separate 
 their interests from those of their neighbours, and to 
 establish a surly and unsocial state of independence. 
 There was no common bond of union, even amongst the 
 French. The feudal system, indeed, generally prevailed ; 
 but so rude was its state, so unfixed its laws, and so 
 uncertain the security which it gave, that hitherto the 
 efforts of every individual were required to preserve his 
 rank and his rights. Beyond selfish interests none had 
 leisure to look. About this epoch, however, the feudal law 
 became consolidated : the rights of princes and vassals 
 were somewhat more respected ; the habits of mutual 
 warfare were checked by the interference of the clergy, 
 whose frequent assemblies and journeyings, joined with 
 the centralisation of ecclesiastical authority in the pope, 
 rendered communicationsbetwixtdifferent provinces more 
 frequent and more facile. The nation, in short, began 
 to re-knit the links that had long been broken. Reli- 
 gion formed one point of sympathy : another was that 
 warlike spirit, which the age and the system generated, 
 but which was allowed no worthy scope or field in which 
 to display itself. A treacherous ambuscade laid for a 
 neighbour, or the tedious siege of his almost impreg- 
 nable castle, were the only opportunities for exercising 
 the restless spirit of a rude and uninstructed race. Even 
 these opportunities the church, with its Treve de Dieu 
 and the regularisation of the feudal code, were daily 
 taking away. In this time of forced and dissatisfactory 
 quiet, the chivalrous spirit was created. Poets and nar- 
 rators sprung up, and were rewarded. The hour of 
 inaction was filled by listening to the recital of stirring 
 deeds. In the absence of real war, the mimickry of it 
 was eagerly sought after ; and the field of tournament 
 was made a substitute for that of battle. Here was 
 D 2
 
 36 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1 060. 
 
 another pretext and cause for assembly, for communi- 
 cation, for society. But even the perils of a tournay 
 had not interest enough for many. Of these, some be- 
 took themselves to far and painful pilgrimages ; others, 
 to combat the infidels in Spain ; others, to wander at 
 home, and afford protection to the weak and the op- 
 pressed, to the damsel and the orphan. 
 
 To a public mind thus at length united in common 
 sympathies, and which was at once so restless, so spirited, 
 and so eager, the most welcome offer was a field of ad- 
 venture. This was found in the East. Pilgrimages 
 had been long the mode. They were the natural conse- 
 quence of the worship of saints and relics, and of the 
 notion that bodily privations and perils encountered would 
 be considered by the deity as a set-off against sin. It 
 was an age of great crimes and great remorses, and pil- 
 grimages formed then the only medicine of the guilty 
 mind ; the Romish church not having yet broached the 
 doctrine, that the payment of money to it was sufficient 
 to purchase a plenary indulgence. For a long period 
 previous to this, pilgrims had been in the habit of flocking 
 to celebrated shrines ; but the holy sepulchre at Jerusalem 
 eclipsed all others in honour and efficacy. In 1054, 
 Lithbert bishop of Cambray had led three thousand 
 Flemish pilgrims to the Holy Land. Some years after, 
 double that number performed the same difficult voyage 
 from the Palatinate and the banks of the Rhine. The 
 sufferings which they endured were unheard of and un- 
 equalled even in the annals of feudal violence. The recital 
 of them by the pilgrims who had escaped provoked the 
 indignation of their compatriots at home; whilst the im- 
 mense spiritual advantages, as well as honour, gained by 
 the achievement of such a journey, excited their warmest 
 emulation. 
 
 These unarmed expeditions, with the cruelties exer- 
 cised upon them by the infidels, suggested armed and 
 hostile ones. The universal thought of an age is often 
 referred to the first bold utterer of it. To Peter the 
 jHermit is attributed the honour of the first crusade. He
 
 1095. PETER THE HERMIT. 3J 
 
 was one of those who had undergone the sufferings and 
 escaped the dangers of pilgrimage. Of an ardent, enthu- 
 siastic character, he conceived the idea of bringing an 
 army of European Christians to rescue the holy sepulchre. 
 With this view he procured letters from the patriarch of 
 Jerusalem to the pope and the princes of Europe, bewail- 
 ing the captivity of the land hallowed as the scene of the 
 Saviour's birth and life, and supplicating the aid of the 
 faithful to its deliverance. Peter the Hermit bore this 
 mission to pope Urban, who replied that he would second 
 the demand to the utmost of his power. Peter did not 
 rely on the pope's support alone, but traversed Europe 
 himself, preaching in every city, depicting in indignant 
 eloquence the sufferings of Christian pilgrims, and the 
 insolence of Turk and Saracen; representing, at the 
 same time, the merit and advantages of acting upon such 
 just resentment, and of marching, under the banner of 
 the Lord, to the defence of his followers and the rescue 
 of his holy sepulchre. The Greek emperor Alexis sent 
 at the same time an embassy, demanding aid against the 
 infidel. A council was held at Placentia to take these im- 
 portant questions into consideration. It proved not con- 
 clusive, however. The Italians, more civilised and less 
 superstitious than surrounding nations, from being near 
 to witness the little sanctity of the existing heads and 
 fathers of the church, as also from the spirit of freedom 
 and commerce which had of late sprung up amongst 
 them, were less enthusiastic than the pope or hermit had 
 hoped. They could not sympathise with the general 
 hatred against the Orientals, with whom they at the time 
 carried on a lucrative trade. They raised neither vote nor 
 acclamation in favour of the crusade. 
 
 The council was, therefore, transferred prudently to a 
 more rude and more devout region. Clermont, in Au- 
 vergne, was that fixed on. The knights, barons, and 
 bishops of France hurried, full of enthusiasm, to the ren- 
 dezvous. Peter the Hermit first addressed the assembly 
 with the heat of his wonted eloquence. Pope Urban fol- 
 lowed him, and the words of the pontiff seemed more 
 D 3
 
 38 HISTOBY OP FRANCE. 1097- 
 
 replete with unction than even the hermit's. No mo- 
 tives of worldliness, of self, or prudence, checked the 
 enthusiasm of the assembly at Auvergne. When Urban, 
 in the midst of his harangue, introduced the verse of the 
 Gospel, "Whosoever shall quit house, or father, or mother, 
 or wife, or lands, for my name, shall receive an hundred 
 fold," the whole audience interrupted the speaker with 
 one burst of assent; and the universal cry of " God wills 
 it ! God wills it ! " came from the crowd. Urban 
 took up the cry, and declared it to be immediately dic- 
 tated by the Divinity. It was a miracle, a striking ma- 
 nifestation of the will of Heaven. The painter's art, 
 better than the historian's, might represent the scene 
 that occurred ; the holy frenzy, the devout resolve, the 
 tear of penitence, the rapt emotion. The pope imposed 
 silence with his hand, and a form of general confession 
 was read to them openly, and repeated by them. They 
 then arose. The bishop of Puy was the first to assume 
 the cross, and his example was followed by every chief 
 of importance present. The brother of king Philip, the 
 Count of Toulouse, Godfrey of Bouillon, Duke of Lower 
 Lorraine, and his brothers, and Robert, Duke of Nor- 
 mandy, son of the Conqueror, were amongst the most 
 renowned undertakers of the crusade. A year's interval 
 was allowed for the preparations necessary to the expe- 
 dition. The zeal of the hermit Peter could not tarry, 
 however, for the lapse of that time. He collected many 
 thousands of the poorer adventurers, who had neither 
 affairs to arrange nor estates to sell. At their head he 
 set forth, following the course of the Danube, towards 
 Constantinople. The Greeks hastened to transport the 
 tumultuous throng over the Bosphorus. In Asia they 
 soon fell victims to their want of discipline and means, 
 and to the vengeance of the Turks. In a few months 
 after, the better ordered army of the crusaders marched 
 under several commanders. In May 1097 they van- 
 quished the soldan of Nicea in battle, avenging the 
 rout of Peter the Hermit and his followers. In June 
 of the following year the crusaders were masters of An-
 
 1108. THE FIRST CRUSADE. 39 
 
 tioch ; and in 1099 they made their victorious entry 
 into Jerusalem, of which Godfrey of Bouillon was de- 
 clared the king. 
 
 While the best blood and interests of France were thus 
 engaged in a chivalrous war, king Philip was occupied 
 in obscure quarrels with pope Urban and William Rufus 
 of England. In the last year of this century, rinding 
 his vigour decline, he associated his son Louis with him 
 in the government, and henceforth became a cipher. 
 Philip died in 1108. Feebleness and inertness mark 
 the reign of the four first Capetians. In the successor 
 of Philip the race began to partake in the general ac- 
 tivity of the age. 
 
 The reign of Louis VI., better known as Louis le 
 Gros, or the Fat, began in the lifetime of his predecessor. 
 He was the first French monarch that entertained any 
 settled maxim of government, or whose ideas reached a 
 system of policy. His predecessors had been the crea- 
 tures, the followers, of events. Louis knew how to control 
 these. The whole effort and aim of his reign was to re- 
 duce the barons of the duchy of France to obedience. His 
 views did not extend to the kingdom. He prudently 
 limited his exertions to the counties within or bordering 
 upon his power. History may disdain to recount minutely 
 the wars carried on by Louis against the barons of Mont- 
 morenci, whose castle rose within view of his capital, or 
 against the lords of Puiset, of Montlheri, or of Couci, 
 possessors of strongholds within a few leagues of Paris, 
 from whence they w y ere wont to sally forth to the plun- 
 der of travellers and merchants. And yet, of all the wars 
 that adorn or sully the French annals, none were more 
 wise in aim, more useful or important in consequences, 
 than these petty enterprises of Louis. His first attempt 
 was against the Burchards, lords of Montmorenci, who 
 were continually in quarrel with the abbaye of St. Denis; 
 and, if we are to believe the chronicles of the day, 
 written for the most part in that famous convent, the 
 Montmorencis were impious spoliators and enemies 
 of the church. Louis stood forth the champion of the 
 4
 
 40 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1108. 
 
 clergy, and brought the Burchards to reason. His next 
 efforts were directed against the chateau of Montlheri 
 and its rapacious owners, who interrupted all communi- 
 cation betwixt the royal towns of Paris and Orleans, 
 greatly to the detriment of commerce and the annoyance 
 of the townsfolk. Louis here took care to have a pretext 
 also. He did not assert his royal authority, and arm to 
 avenge it. It was as the ally of the clergy that he sub- 
 dued the Montmorencis ; it was as the friend of com- 
 merce, and the avenger of the plundered burgesses, that 
 he besieged Montlheri. Louis XI. did not use more 
 policy and feint in Lls undermining of the aristocracy, 
 than did Louis VI. ; the latter, unfortunately for his own 
 fame, having only the smaller sphere of action. 
 
 Nevertheless, the name of Louis the Fat stands con- 
 nected with one of the most important revolutions in the 
 civil history of France, viz. the enfranchisement of the 
 communes or commons, as the early municipalities were 
 called. From him towns received their first charters ; 
 from his reign their first liberties date. We have seen 
 that, from the earliest period of this history, the mass 
 of the people enjoyed no influence or consideration. 
 Utterly enslaved at first, the feudal system somewhat 
 improved their condition, and admitted them to partial 
 privileges. Still the aristocracy pressed them down 
 with an iron hand. Serfs in the country, villains in the 
 town, their property and life were held under suffer- 
 ance of the seignor rather than as sacred rights. Man's 
 natural pride alone might cause him to revolt against 
 such injustice : but the towns of Europe were not 
 without traditions of a more equitable state of things. 
 They had enjoyed freedom as municipalities under the 
 Roman empire ; and, however politically dependant, all 
 local authority had been exercised by the civic council 
 and magistrates. To the remembrance of these days 
 the townsmen held with obstinacy. The precedent was 
 recorded, if not on parchment, at least in the hearts of 
 the oppressed. It was handed down from father to son ; 
 and not all the ignorance and violence of the dark ages
 
 1108. LOUIS THE FAT. 41 
 
 proved sufficient to erase or tread out the old vestiges of 
 municipal freedom. It happened, too, that the struggle 
 betwixt church and aristocracy was maintained more 
 especially in towns. The bishop and the count almost 
 always disputed the sovereignty of the town ; and po- 
 pular rights, in consequence, must have been at times 
 invoked by the weaker party. In Italy, where this 
 struggle was fiercest, owing to the quarrels betwixt pope 
 and emperor, the cities took the earliest advantage of 
 this position. The citizens, leagued together in their 
 own interest, formed communes or municipal councils, 
 and, balancing their attachment and support betwixt the 
 contending parties, succeeded in establishing their inde- 
 pendence. Security thus gained from their rapacious 
 masters, commerce, wealth, order, respect, the natural 
 consequences of liberty, were found to follow. The 
 south of France first caught this spirit from their neigh- 
 bours on the other side of the Alps. The towns of 
 Provence and Languedoc early erected themselves into 
 little republics, more or less independent of neighbouring 
 princes, under the rule of their own consuls. But Lan- 
 guedoc or Provence could not as yet be considered as 
 making part of the French monarchy. Under Philip I. 
 the towns of the north began to imitate those of 
 the south. Mantes, according to some, was the first 
 commune ; according to others, Noyon. It was in the 
 reign of Louis the Fat that the communes openly 
 asserted and established their civic privileges. The 
 only revenues of that prince were drawn from his good 
 cities ; and it behoved him, on this account, to set them 
 free from the yoke of other masters or spoliators. The 
 formation of the civic magistracies and militia checked 
 mightily the arrogance of the barons : and Louis, with- 
 out supposing in him any principle of policy too profound 
 or foreseeing for his age, could not but perceive this 
 tendency, and encourage it. Eeauvais, Noyon, Laon, 
 Amiens, and Soissons, had all charters granted them by 
 Louis the Fat. In some towns the bishops favoured, in 
 some they opposed, the enfranchisement of the com-
 
 42 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1115. 
 
 mons. The barons were in general averse. The 
 king was obliged to wage a tedious war against the 
 family of Couci, which, by means of a fortress, kept 
 possession of the town of Amiens. He at length took 
 and razed it; and the seignory of the De Coucis merged 
 in the township of Amiens. 
 
 It was not merely by military exploits, and by the 
 elevation of the tiers etat or third estate, that the royal 
 authority progressed during the reign of Louis VI. 
 The judicial authority attributed to the monarch by the 
 feudal system, and exercised by him in his court or 
 council of peers, made him the arbiter of disputed suc- 
 cessions. It was thus that Philip I. had extended 
 his influence over the province of Berri. His son Louis 
 interfered in the quarrels of the house of Bourbon, where 
 a minor struggled against the usurpation of his uncle. 
 Louis entered the Bourbonnois with an army in 1115, 
 took Germigny, the principal fortress of Aymon of 
 Bourbon, and compelled him to submit. Not since the 
 early Carlovingians had the banners of a king of France 
 been seen so far from his capital. The continued rivalry 
 betwixt the Normans or English, and the French, 
 excited and kept alive the warlike spirit of both na- 
 tions. Henry I. reigned in England, and also in Nor- 
 mandy, which he had usurped from his brother Robert. 
 Louis took the part of the latter, as well as of his son 
 William ; and mutual wars, or rather ravages, were 
 frequent, with intervals of peace, betwixt the nations. 
 
 One event that occurred during these wars marks 
 strongly the cruel spirit of the age : Henry I. 
 was struggling against an insurrection of the Norman 
 barons in favour of his nephew : this was the moment 
 chosen by the Count of Breteuil to demand of the king 
 the fortress of Ivry, which adjoined his possessions. 
 The count had married Henry's natural daughter Ju- 
 liana, and hence esteemed that he had a claim upon his 
 generosity. It was not the moment to refuse the demand 
 of a noble. Henry, however, was reluctant to give up 
 Ivry; but, in order to content Breteuil, he ordered
 
 1121. DEFEAT OF LOUIS AT BRE.VXEVILLE. 43 
 
 Harenc, the royal governor of the town, to deliver up 
 his son to the lord of Breteuil ; at the same time making 
 the count deliver his daughters by Juliana, as counter- 
 hostages, to his own keeping. He thus ensured that 
 Harenc would not sally from his place of command, or 
 otherwise make use of it to annoy or injure the Count of 
 Breteuil. The latter, however, was not satisfied with 
 the arrangement. He laid siege to the fortress of Iviy, 
 and threatened to put his hostage, the governor's son, to 
 death, in case the latter did not surrender his trust. 
 Breteuil reasoned that his children would, at all events, 
 be safe in the custody of their grandfather. Harenc 
 would not deliver Ivry ; and the Count of Breteuil, in 
 pursuance of his threat, put out the eyes of his young 
 hostage. Raoul de Harenc flew to the feet of Henry, 
 and, in the rage of sorrow and resentment, demanded 
 the daughters of his enemy, that he might use the ter- 
 rible right of reprisal. Henry hesitated. The monarch 
 was cruelly situated : but the ideas of feudal justice pre- 
 vailed in his mind over attachment to his kin. The 
 monarch delivered his grandchildren, the daughters of 
 the Count of Breteuil, and Harenc tore out their eyes, 
 and cut off their noses, in execution of the vengeance 
 that he deemed just. 
 
 The principal feat of the war betwixt Henry and 
 Louis was produced by accident. The two kings, each 
 at the head of some five hundred knights, encountered 
 one another in the plain of Brenneville. An engagement 
 ensued, in which Louis was routed, and most of the 
 French made prisoners. Only three were killed : to 
 such perfection had defensive armour been brought so 
 much had war sunk to the mimickry of a tournament. 
 Another enterprise of Louis, in the year 1121, marks 
 the rapid increase of the king's influence. A few years 
 since he had established his authority in the Bourbonnois: 
 now he extended it to Auvergne. In a quarrel betwixt 
 the count and bishop of Clermont, the latter appealed to 
 Louis, who summoned the count to his supreme court, 
 and, on his refusal to appear, marched with an army and
 
 44 HISTORY Or FRANCE. 1137- 
 
 subdued him, as he had previously the lord of Bourbon. 
 The counts of Anjou and of Nevers aided him in the 
 expedition. They felt no reluctance in carrying into 
 effect the decrees of that court of peers of which they 
 formed a part. Louis VI. died in 1137- It is strange 
 that history could find for this monarch no epithet save 
 that of the Fat, at the same time that it records innu- 
 merable proofs of a talented mind, of an active and 
 enterprising spirit. 
 
 Towards the conclusion of this monarch's reign, for- 
 tune came to reward and crown his efforts for the ex- 
 tension of the royal authority. William, Count of Poi- 
 tiers, about to undertake a pilgrimage, from which he 
 had the presentiment that he never should return, offered 
 his daughter Eleonora in marriage to Louis the Young, 
 son of Louis the Fat. She was the heiress of her father's 
 possessions, which surpassed in extent and importance 
 those of the king of France himself, comprising Guienne 
 and Poitou, all the country, in fact, betwixt the Loire 
 and the Adour. The marriage was celebrated at Bour- 
 deaux ; and soon after it arrived tidings of the deaths 
 both of the king and of the Count of Poitiers. Thus 
 Louis VII,, or the Young, succeeded to dominions and 
 authority infinitely more ample than those which his 
 father had inherited. But the want of talent in the son 
 did away with all these advantages. Nevertheless he 
 commenced his reign with spirit. He chastised several 
 refractory nobles, and resolved to support the queen's 
 rights to the county of Toulouse. Louis besieged that 
 town. He failed in taking it, indeed : but the king of 
 France, at the head of an army, made his name and 
 power known for the first time to the inhabitants of the 
 south. During a war carried on about the same time 
 against Thibaud, Count of Champagne, an accident oc- 
 curred, which had a marked effect upon the future conduct 
 and character of Louis the Young. He had taken by 
 storm the castle of Vitry, and set fire to it. The flames 
 chanced to catch the neighbouring church, into which 
 the population had crowded, to preserve themselves from
 
 1147- THE SECOND CRUSADE. 45 
 
 the fury of the soldiery. It appears that they had no 
 means of escape. Thirteen hundred men, women, and 
 children, perished in the conflagration. Louis was 
 horror-struck on beholding the mass of half consumed 
 bodies, and the weight of the remorse hung ever after 
 upon him, and weighed down his spirit. It was the 
 chief cause that induced him to assume the cross, and to 
 lead that expedition to Jerusalem which is known in 
 history as the second crusade. 
 
 Edessa, one of the principal towns possessed and 
 garrisoned by the French in Palestine, was taken by the 
 sultan of Aleppo, and the inhabitants put to the sword. 
 The tidings stirred up all Christendom to vengeance. 
 Assemblies and councils were called, and a final one 
 met at Vezelay, in which the enthusiasm of that of 
 Clermont was equalled. The celebrated Saint Bernard 
 was the eloquent haranguer upon this occasion, and filled 
 the place of Peter the Hermit ; having, however, unlike 
 his predecessor, the good sense to refuse the conduct of 
 the expedition when it was offered to him. The em- 
 peror Conrad and Louis VII. each led an army 
 of upwards of a hundred thousand men through the 
 valley of the Danube to Constantinople. No sooner, 
 however, had they passed into Asia, than the Germans, 
 who preceded the French, were routed and cut to pieces. 
 The army of the latter took a more circuitous path, but 
 scarcely with better fortune. One half of their number 
 was cut off; the rest reached Satalia, a sea-port opposite 
 to Cyprus, where the king and his nobles, weary of the 
 tedious march by land, took shipping for Palestine, 
 leaving their followers to make the best of their way on 
 foot, without guide or leader. All that remained pe- 
 rished. And of the two hundred thousand warriors 
 who had left the west of Europe, bold of spirit and 
 resplendent in arms, Louis only, with a band of some 
 hundred of cavaliers, reached the Holy Land. The ig- 
 nominy of this ill success, and the desertion of his 
 followers, fell upon king Louis ; and he felt it, not to 
 rally and redeem his character, but to sink under the
 
 46 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 11 47- 
 
 shame. He abandoned the feelings of the monarch and 
 the warrior for those of the pilgrim; refused at first to 
 undertake any enterprise against the infidels; and stole 
 from Antioch to Jerusalem like a craven. If his sub- 
 jects were discontented with such weakness in their 
 sovereign, Eleonoraof Aquitaine was still more disgusted 
 with such a husband : she refused longer to remain on 
 any friendly terms with him. The historians of France, 
 who detest the memory of her who transferred half the 
 provinces of the kingdom to the Plantagenets, accuse her 
 of lightness of conduct on this occasion; but their tes- 
 timony is much to be mistrusted. Not a single feat of 
 arms marked the stay of Louis in Palestine, where 
 he lingered until 1149, ashamed to return. He did so 
 at length, and it was to show that all prudence had 
 forsaken him as well as courage. The quarrel betwixt 
 him and Eleonora was at its height. He withdrew his 
 garrisons from Aquitaine, more in spite than policy. A 
 divorce was pronounced betwixt the spouses by an as- 
 sembly of prelates at Beaugency, and Eleonora soon 
 after married Henry II. of England, bringing with her 
 the rich dowry of her inheritance. 
 
 Hence dates the rivalry betwixt the kings which fills 
 up the rest of their reigns. In perusing their history, 
 and beholding the superior activity, talents, and power 
 of the English monarch, we expect to see him crush his 
 rival and usurp his place. But in that age war tended 
 more to mutual annoyance than to conquest : it was a 
 livelihood to the needy, a portion to the powerful; and 
 neither were very serious or bent upon the destruction 
 of an enemy. A prisoner that could afford a large 
 ransom, was chiefly looked to by each soldier in the 
 event of a battle. Feudal rights and supremacy were 
 also held in high respect; and the name of suzerain, 
 though but a name, often supplied to Louis the place of 
 the armies of his vassal Henry. In time the church 
 came to fling itself into the scale. The persecution and 
 murder of Thomas a Becket roused all the clergy in 
 enmity to Henry, and Louis took advantage of their aid.
 
 1180. DEATH OF LOUIS THE YOUNG. 47 
 
 Later still, the French monarch used the more unworthy 
 expedient of exciting the sons of Henry to rebel against 
 their parent ; and throughout, he contrived to supply 
 by intrigue what he wanted in martial spirit, activity, 
 and power. Although the divorce of Eleonora deprived 
 Louis of the possession of Aquitaine, still the marriage 
 was not useless to him : it made the monarch's name to 
 be known, and his authority invoked, in the south. 
 When Henry endeavoured to make good those same 
 rights of Eleonora upon Toulouse that Louis himself 
 had supported, the latter took the part of the Tou- 
 lousans, and defeated the intentions of his rival. And 
 he was equally successful in support of the people 
 of Auvergne. Louis VII. was long without a son, 
 and at length obtained one by dint of prayer. When 
 the life of the prince was threatened by a fever, the 
 anxious parent undertook a pilgrimage to Canterbury, 
 to the tomb of St. Thomas a Becket, for his recovery. 
 The young Philip recovered ; but Louis, on his return, 
 was struck with a palsy, under which he lingered for 
 the space of a year, and died in 1 1 80. 
 
 Two centuries had now elapsed since the accession 
 of Hugh Capet. At that period France was divided 
 into a thousand petty states, each shut up in its bar- 
 barism. Selfishness, violence, and want of faith, were 
 general characteristics. Courage was the only virtue 
 prized ; independence the only boon sought after. Now, 
 however, a union, a concentration, had taken place. The 
 unforeseen development of the feudal system had raised 
 the king supreme above the aristocracy; and this, to- 
 gether with other causes, amongst which the crusades 
 rank foremost, had assimilated the formerly disjointed 
 parts of the state, and given a general bond of sympathy 
 to the nation. Social habits and frequent intercourse 
 excited emulation of a kind less coarse and more varied 
 than the mere struggle betwixt strong and weak. The 
 creation of wealth and luxury suggested the more re- 
 fined wants of the imagination and the heart. Selfish- 
 ness and fraud gave way to the chivalrous virtues. A
 
 48 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1180. 
 
 general tendency to enthusiasm and devotion distin- 
 guished the rising age ; and both were extreme, to 
 whatever object directed, whether towards religion, to- 
 wards royalty, or to the fairer sex. 
 
 Philip Augustus, who was about fifteen years of age 
 when he began to reign, was already the nursling of 
 court adulation and homage. His predecessors had not 
 attained dignity sufficient to expose them to this bane of 
 the royal nature. Congratulations, couched in the lan- 
 guage of oriental hyperbole, had greeted his birth. He 
 was styled the Dieu-donne, the august ; and self-con- 
 stituted laureates began already to celebrate the majesty 
 of the monarch of the French. Formerly, the sur.- 
 rounding nobles had disdained to dispute court favour 
 or influence ; but the first years of Philip's reign were 
 taken up with the rivalry of the houses of Flanders and 
 Champagne, which each sought to be the masters and 
 ministers of the young sovereign. Henry II. of 
 England gave his support to the Counts of Cham- 
 pagne, and the partisans of Flanders were obliged to 
 retire from Paris. They formed a league, and menaced 
 war ; but Philip, with the English monarch's aid, easily 
 overcame the malcontents. Henry showed generosity 
 on this occasion. Instead of profiting by the divisions 
 of the French, and keeping them alive, he frankly sup- 
 ported the young king against his refractory barons. He 
 was king himself, and sympathised with royalty. Philip 
 ill repaid this kindness : he imitated his father's policy 
 in seducing the sons of the English monarch from their 
 allegiance; and their frequent ingratitude at length broke 
 the heart of the sensitive and passionate monarch. 
 Richard, Duke of Aquitaine, known as Cceur de Lion, 
 and his father's successor on the throne, was the especial 
 friend and ally of Philip in these quarrels ; and for a 
 long time the princes shared the same tent and the same 
 bed. 
 
 Meantime a third crusade began to be preached. This 
 prevalent enthusiasm, like the rebellions of an oppressed 
 yet brave people, was sure to arouse itself and re-awaken
 
 1190. THE THIRD CRUSADE. 49 
 
 as soon as time had elapsed sufficient to allow the disasters 
 of the past to be forgotten. Saladin had recently taken 
 Jerusalem. Fugitives instantly filled Europe with the 
 dismal tidings. The cry for a crusade became general: 
 it was no longer, however, the church that called a 
 council to debate and decide upon the question ; another 
 power had arisen to rob the clergy of their initiative. 
 The king called a parkment of his barons at Gisors, and 
 there a third crusade was determined upon. Cceur de 
 Lion was the first to assume the cross ; and king Philip, 
 only hurt at being anticipated, followed his example. 
 Frederic Barbarossa also took the same resolution. That 
 emperor died, owing to imprudently bathing in a river 
 of Asia Minor, ere he reached the Holy Land. 
 
 In June of the year 1 1 90, Philip Augustus received 
 the pilgrim's scrip and staff from the hands of the abbot 
 of St. Denis. Richard received his at Tours; and it was 
 remarked, as an omen, that, as he leaned on the staff, it 
 broke under his weight. In order to avoid the disasters 
 of former crusades, they were to proceed to Palestine by 
 sea. The two kings wintered in Sicily on their voyage 
 thither, and there laid the foundation of their future 
 jealousy and hate. The crusaders found the barons 
 of Syria engaged in the siege of Acre. Their arrival 
 hastened its surrender, and at the same time marked it 
 with crime. Richard caused upwards of two thousand 
 captives to be massacred in cold blood, and Philip was 
 guilty of a similar piece of cruelty. The monarchs, 
 indeed, had some slight breach of stipulations to allege, 
 or might excuse their conduct as a reprisal for that of 
 Saladin, who put to death many of the prisoners whom 
 he made at the battle of Tiberias, more especially all 
 those whose tonsure marked them to belong to the order 
 of the Templars. It was thus that the ferocity of ori- 
 ental manners came to alloy the more generous spirit of 
 chivalry. In Palestine the French learned to be san- 
 guinary and merciless towards their religious enemies, 
 and hence it was that the fair page of their history was 
 
 VOL. I. E
 
 50 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1 1 99- 
 
 soon afterwards stained by the massacre of those whom 
 they called heretics at home. 
 
 Philip Augustus could not long endure the superior 
 renown and prowess of Cceur de Lion. He seized the 
 pretext of an illness to quit Palestine and abandon the 
 field of glory to his rival. Returning home, he besought 
 the pope to release him from the oath which bound him to 
 respect the rights and territories of a brother crusader. 
 The pontiff refused: but Philip felt himself sufficiently 
 absolved by the Machiavelian law of monarchical policy. 
 And fortune, in making Richard fall captive to the Duke 
 of Austria, in his return from the Holy Land, seemed to 
 favour the envious designs of the French monarch. 
 Philip no sooner was informed of Richard's captivity, 
 than he leagued with his brother John, and invaded 
 Normandy. He took several towns and castles, but was 
 repulsed from before Rouen. At length Richard was 
 released, or, as Philip wrote to his confederate, " the 
 devil broke loose." We expect on this occasion to 
 read of a furious war betwixt the sovereigns. And yet 
 no brilliant feat, no general engagement, marked that 
 which ensued. Petty treason and short truce, varied by 
 a skirmish or a marauding party, were all the effects 
 produced by the envy of Philip and the resentment of 
 the lion-hearted king. The death of the latter by an 
 arrow-shot, as he besieged a castle in the Limousin, 
 left a less formidable rival to Philip in the person of 
 king John. 
 
 The writer of fiction never imagined a baser cha- 
 racter than that of John. His cowardice and meanness 
 form a phenomenon and an exception in the feudal ages. 
 The nullity of such a rival converted Philip Augustus 
 from the powerless intriguer to the conqueror and the 
 hero. The latter, who knew the character of John, no 
 sooner heard of his succession than he prepared to take 
 advantage of it. And yet intrigue was the first weapon 
 he employed. As he had seduced Richard from his 
 father's allegiance, and John from that of Richard, 
 Philip now espoused the cause of Arthur of Britany,
 
 1204. CONQUEST OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 51 
 
 the nephew of John, proclaiming his right not only 
 to Britany, but to Poitou, Anjou, and Touraine. War 
 ensued, during which chance made Arthur prisoner 
 to his uncle. All acquainted with the pages of Shak- 
 speare know too well the young prince's fate. Philip 
 was in the mean time checked in his projects by 
 the court of Rom ?> which had laid an interdict upon 
 him, on account of his divorce from Ingeburga of Den- 
 mark. And the preaching of a fourth crusade about 
 the same time took from him the interest and the aid of 
 many nobles and chevaliers. This expedition scarcely 
 belongs to our history. It was undertaken in con- 
 cert with the Venetians ; but, instead of contributing 
 to the defeat of the Saracens, the crusaders turned 
 their forces against the Greek emperor, and made them- 
 selves masters of Constantinople, where they estab- 
 lished a Latin dynasty. By the taking and sack of 
 Constantinople the cavaliers of the West did more in- 
 jury to the Christian cause than ever their victories in 
 Palestine worked detriment to the power of the followers 
 of Mahomet. 
 
 Philip was, during the same interval, engaged in the 
 conquest of Normandy, which the imbecility and cowardice 
 of John delivered to his arms without defence. Roger 
 de Lascy held the fortress of Andelys for several months 
 against the French, and was the only valiant servitor of 
 an unworthy monarch. The barons and warriors of 
 England disdained to fight under his banner. There 
 was as yet none of that rivalry which afterwards sprang 
 up betwixt the nations. The monarchs of both were 
 French princes, speaking the French tongue : and, al- 
 though subsequent historians have given a national colour 
 to the combats and conquests of Philip, the struggle was 
 almost purely personal. Rouen, the capital of Nor- 
 mandy, surrendered to him (1204), without John's mak- 
 ing a single effort to preserve it. And thus a few years 
 of the reign of one weak prince more than counter- 
 balanced the long established superiority of the monarchs 
 of England. 
 
 E 2
 
 52 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1204. 
 
 It has been seen what use the French monarchs made 
 of their courts of peers, and of the judicial supremacy 
 allowed them, in extending their authority over barons 
 heretofore independent. Philip dared to apply the same 
 principle to the dukes of Normandy, which his father 
 had successfully done with regard to the counts of 
 Bourbon and Auvergne. He summoned John before 
 his suzerain court, to answer for the murder of Arthur 
 and other crimes. Henry II., or Richard, would have 
 given fit answer to such a summons. The Xorman 
 princes always held their homage to be that by parade 
 or courtesy, not homage-liege. But John had neither 
 the sense of his dignity, nor the spirit to maintain it. 
 He allowed the jurisdiction of Philip's court, though he 
 feared to obey his summons ; and he thus seemed to 
 allow a legal right to the usurpations of Philip. The 
 latter, indeed, appeared to feel the want of dignity in the 
 assessors of his court. All nobles holding their lands 
 directly of the king were peers in his parliament ; and 
 thus the petty lords of the counties of Paris and Orleans 
 ranked equally with the dukes of Burgundy or the counts 
 of Flanders. Philip remedied this, by appointing twelve 
 great peers, or rather by pretending that such a number 
 had always existed since the twelve paladins of Charle- 
 magne. Of these, six were clerics, six laics; the latter 
 being the dukes of Normandy, of Aquitaine, of Bur- 
 gundy, the counts of Toulouse, Flanders, and Cham- 
 pagne. This division of the aristocracy in the high 
 and low nobility, was, however, as yet but nominal ; 
 the lesser barons still continued to consider themselves 
 as the peers of the greater, and to have an equal voice 
 in the royal courts. It is important for the reader to 
 mark the rise of this feudal institution, and equally so 
 to mark the difference of its fate and progress in France 
 and in England. In the former country, the parle- 
 ment became amalgamated with lawyers, and preserved 
 fo the last its judicial functions, whilst its legislative 
 authority became but a shadow. In England, on the 
 contrary, it guarded the more precious privilege of legis-
 
 1204. PHILIP AVGUSTUS. 53 
 
 lation, abandoning a considerable portion of its judicial 
 rights. 
 
 By the discomfiture of John, Philip Augustus united 
 to the monarchy of France not only Normandy, but the 
 provinces of Maine, Anjou, Touraine, and Poitou. Artois 
 he had acquired as the dowry of his wife, Isabella of 
 Hainault. The counties of the south remained still in- 
 dependent of his sway. They looked to the king of 
 Aragon as their suzerain ; and there existed far more 
 congeniality of feelings and habits betwixt the Spaniards 
 and Provencals, than betwixt the Provencals and French. 
 Certain events of the reign of Philip, which we are about 
 to relate, destroyed the independence of the people of the 
 south, as well as their connection with the Aragonese, 
 and extended the authority of the French monarch to 
 the Mediterranean and the Pyrenees. 
 
 Whilst Philip Augustus adroitly wrested Normandy 
 and its dependencies from the hands of John, a series of 
 events took place in Languedoc, which had the effect of 
 destroying its independence, and of bringing that fine 
 region not only nominally, as it had hitherto been, but 
 really under the dominion of the kings of France. The 
 countries bordering on the Mediterranean had ever been 
 foremost in the path of civilisation. They were still so. 
 The inhabitants of that part of France so situated far 
 surpassed their northern neighbours in refinement, in 
 enlightenment, and wealth. A thriving commerce was 
 the chief source of these advantages, joined with the 
 municipal liberty, which they enjoyed even to a greater 
 degree than countries around them. The towns were 
 governed by consuls, like those of Italy; and, being freed 
 from either papal or imperial pretensions, were far more 
 tranquil than the republics of that land. The feudal lords 
 lived in amity with the bourgeoisie, and shared its wealth; 
 communicating at the same time to the middling ranks 
 no small portion of their own chivalrous spirit. Little 
 agitated, at least for that age, by the tumults and conten- 
 tions of war, the Provencals gave thems'elves to the cul- 
 tivation of those intellectual employments which wealth 
 E 3
 
 54 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1204. 
 
 and leisure, peace and a fine climate, suggest. In their 
 valleys the muse of modern times had taken birth. They 
 were the first poets of modern tongues. Nor did the 
 troubadours confine their strains to the celebration of 
 heroic deeds or the pleadings of love ; they were 
 moralists and satirists, and undertook to lash as well as 
 to amuse the age. The church was the chief object of 
 their alternate ridicule and resentment. Dante and 
 Petrarch, as well as our own Chaucer, afford samples of 
 this spirit. They exclaimed against the licentious lives 
 of the clergy; rallied them on their rigid upholding of 
 abstract dogmas, and their lax observance of moral ones. 
 The troubadours stood forth as the asserters and avengers 
 of common sense. And thus the earliest of modern poets 
 perhaps merit the honour of being esteemed the first 
 reformers. 
 
 The speculations of the theologian and the scruples 
 of the devout soon came to swell a passing disgust into 
 permanent dissent. A numerous sect sprang up in 
 Languedoc, which, abjuring much of the corrupt mo- 
 rality and absurd tenets of the Romish church, was led 
 of course to deny the authority of the pope and of his 
 priesthood. For a long time the Holy See seemed not 
 alive to the importance of this sect. It was pope Inno- 
 cent III. who first perceived its dangerous tendency, 
 and who took certain steps for its destruction. He issued 
 interdicts against such princes as should favour them, 
 and offered the spoil of the heretic to whoever should 
 subdue and slay him. The principal lord of the south 
 of France was at that time Raymond VI. count of 
 Toulouse ; and he at least tolerated the Albigenses, as 
 those primitive reformers were called, aware of their 
 moral purity and sincere devotion. Peter of Castelnau, 
 the pope's legate, reproached the count of Toulouse with 
 his want of zeal, and was indignant at his forbearance 
 to extirpate the new opinions by fire and sword. The 
 legate used no measured language ; he not only excom- 
 municated Raymond, but insulted him in his court, 
 and then took his departure. The count of Toulouse
 
 1209- CRUSADE AGAINST THE ALBIGEXSES. 55 
 
 expressed his indignant feelings before his followers as 
 Henry II. did after the insolence of Thomas-a-Becket, 
 and with the same fatal effect. On the day after, Peter 
 of Castelnau fell under the dagger of a gentleman of 
 the count's, in a hostelry on the Rhone, where he had 
 stopped. 
 
 Pope Innocent was driven to transports of rage on 
 learning the assassination of his legate. He not only 
 excommunicated the count of Toulouse, but promulgated 
 a crusade against him. He called on all the nobles of 
 France, on its princes, and its prelates, to join in the holy 
 war, to assume the cross, as being engaged against infi- 
 dels. And the same privileges and indulgences were 
 granted to the crusader of this civil war, that previously 
 were bestowed on those who embarked fortune and life 
 in the perilous attempt to rescue the Holy Land from 
 the Saracen. Spoil, wealth, and honour in this world, 
 together with certain salvation in the next, were now 
 offered at too cheap a rate to be refused. Crowds of 
 adventurers flocked to the standard; and a formidable 
 army was assembled at Lyons in the spring of 1209, 
 under the command of the legate commander, Amalric 
 abbot of Citeaux. The pope at the same time created 
 a new ecclesiastical militia for the destruction of heresy. 
 The order of St. Dominick, or of the friars inquisitors, 
 was instituted; and these infernal missionaries were let 
 loose in couples upon the hapless Languedoc, like blood- 
 hounds, to scent their prey and then devour it. 
 
 Raymond count of Toulouse had neither the force 
 nor the courage to oppose so formidable an invasion. He 
 repaired to the crusader's army, delivered up his fort- 
 resses and cities, and suffered the humiliating penance 
 of a public flogging in the church of St. Giles. The 
 count's relative and feudatory, Raymond Roger viscount 
 of Beziers and Carcassonne, regions infected with the 
 heresy of the Albigenses, came also to make submission. 
 The abbot of Citeaux, who was prudent enough to accept 
 that of the count of Toulouse, feared to lose all his prey. 
 He refused to admit the exculpation of the viscount of 
 E 4
 
 56 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1209. 
 
 Beziers, and plainly told him that his only chance was 
 to defend himself to the utmost. The young viscount 
 courageously accepted the advice. He summoned the 
 most faithful of his vassals, abandoned the open country 
 as well as towns of lesser consequence to the enemy, and 
 restricted his efforts to the defence of Beziers and of 
 Carcassonne. He shut himself up in the latter. The 
 fury of the crusaders first fell upon Beziers: they had 
 scarcely sat down before the unfortunate town, when a 
 sally of the garrison was repulsed with such vigour that 
 the besiegers entered the town together with the routed 
 host of the citizens. Word of this unexpected success 
 was instantly brought to the abbot of Citeaux, and his 
 orders were demanded as to how the innocent were to 
 be distinguished from the guilty. " Slay them all," ex- 
 claimed the legate of the vicar of Christ ; " the Lord 
 will know his own." The entire population was in 
 consequence put to the sword; nor woman nor infant 
 was spared. Upwards of 20,000 human beings perished 
 in the massacre the sanguinary first fruits of modern 
 persecution. Carcassonne was next invested, bravely 
 attacked, and as valiantly defended; the young viscount 
 distinguishing himself in defence of his rights, while 
 Simon de Montfort earl of Leicester was the most pro- 
 minent warrior of the crusaders. At length the legate 
 grew weary of the viscount's obstinacy, and offered him 
 terms. He gave him a safe-conduct, sanctioned by his 
 own oath and that of the barons of his army. Raymond 
 Roger came with 300 of his followers to the tent of the 
 legate. " Faith," said the latter, " is not to be kept with 
 those who have no faith ;" and he ordered the viscount 
 and his friends to be put in chains. The inhabitants of 
 Carcassonne found means to fly. In a general assembly 
 of the crusaders, the lordships of Beziers and Carcassonne 
 were given to Simon of Montfort, in reward of his zeal 
 and valour ; and to make the gift sure, it was accom- 
 panied with the person of his rival. The unfortunate 
 viscount, the victim of the legate's perfidy, soon after 
 perished in prison.
 
 1217- 8IMON DE MONTFORT. 5? 
 
 The victory of the crusaders was of course followed 
 by executions at the stake and on the scaffold. The 
 friars inquisitors of the order of St. Dominick did not 
 relax their zeal. A general revolt against De Montfort 
 was the consequence, in which the people of Toulouse 
 joined. The Provencal army was headed by Peter king 
 of Aragon, the uncle of the late viscount of Beziers. It 
 was he who had persuaded the unfortunate viscount to 
 trust himself to the legate, and to him in consequence 
 fell the duty of taking vengeance. The cross, however 
 the profaned cross was still successful. The Provencals 
 were routed by Simon de Montfort at the battle of Muret, 
 and the king of Aragon was slain. This victory seemed 
 to establish the power of De Montfort in Languedoc. 
 He took possession of all the provinces of his rival, even 
 of the town of Toulouse ; and an assembly of prelates 
 sanctioned the usurpation. But the cruel spirit of De 
 Montfort would not allow him to rest quiet in his new 
 empire. Violence and persecution marked his rule ; he 
 sought to destroy the Provencal population by the sword 
 or the stake, nor could he bring himself to tolerate the 
 liberties of the citizens of Toulouse. In 1217 the 
 Toulousans again revolted, and war once more broke out 
 betwixt count Raymond and Simon de Montfort. The 
 latter formed the siege of the capital, and was engaged 
 in repelling a sally, when a stone from one of the walls 
 struck him and put an end to his existence. The death 
 of De Montfort was of course considered a martyrdom 
 by the clergy, and his fame in their chronicles far out- 
 shines that of Godfrey of Bouillon or of Richard the 
 Lion-hearted. 
 
 King Philip was in the mean time pursuing his 
 darling object, the humbling the power of the princes of 
 England. He had already driven John from the west 
 of France. That monarch, at variance with his barons, 
 and at the same time excommunicated by the church, 
 seemed an easy prey to Philip. The French king me- 
 ditated the conquest of England. He leagued with the 
 malcontents of that country, and formed a powerful
 
 58 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1214. 
 
 army for the purposes of invasion. John, to ward off 
 the blow, not only became reconciled to the Roman see, 
 but made himself and his kingdom feudatory to the pope. 
 A papal legate immediately took John under his pro- 
 tection ; and the French monarch, rather than risk a 
 quarrel with the church, turned his armies towards 
 Flanders, which he wasted and plundered impitiably, 
 from hatred to its count. The emperor Otho, then in 
 alliance with king John against France, came to the 
 relief of the Flemings ; and thus, for the first time 
 since the accession of the new dynasty, the armies of 
 France and Germany found themselves arrayed against 
 each other in national hostility, each commanded by its 
 respective monarch. The rival hosts met at Bouvines, 
 in the month of August 1214. Twenty thousand com- 
 batants on either side, together with the presence of two 
 monarchs, gave gravity and importance to the action. 
 It was sharply contested. Wherever the armed knight 
 met the comparatively defenceless burgess the latter 
 was defeated ; the militia of the commons had not yet 
 acquired discipline and hardihood sufficient to compete 
 with the iron-clad warriors of the aristocracy. It was 
 thus the cavalry of Otho broke through a band of mi- 
 litia, and reaching king Philip, threw him from his horse, 
 and would have killed him, but for the excellence of his 
 armour and the devotion of several brave followers. The 
 emperor Otho, on his side, encountered equal peril from 
 the French knights, and escaped with difficulty from 
 the field. The rebel counts of Boulogne and Flanders 
 both were made prisoners. The army of Philip gained 
 a complete victory. Bouvines was the first important 
 battle of the monarchy ; the first in which the king 
 appeared in his place, at the head of his barons, leading 
 them on to conquest. It materially increased the dig- 
 nity and authority of the French king ; whilst, to Philip 
 Augustus personally, it brought not only its just meed 
 of praise, but an exaggerated portion of renown. 
 
 The brilliant success of Bouvines seems to have con- 
 tented and allayed the hitherto restless ambition of
 
 1223. DEATH OF PHILIP AUGUSTUS. 59 
 
 Philip. In a year or two after, the barons of England, 
 discontented with John, offered their crown to Louis, 
 the son of Philip Augustus. The old monarch hesi- 
 tated ; he dreaded the anathema with which the pope 
 threatened him, if he attacked his vassal, John of Eng- 
 land. Prince Louis was obliged to undertake the ex- 
 pedition with but scanty aid from his parent. He was 
 at first successful. Almost all England owned his so- 
 vereignty. The castle of Dover alone held out. But 
 the death of John, which took place during the siege, 
 and the proclaiming of his son, Henry III., soon 
 obliged the French prince to abandon his claim and his 
 conquests in England. 
 
 In the south, Philip Augustus showed himself equally 
 dead to enterprise and lost in spirit. Amaury de Mont- 
 fort, son of Simon, offered to cede to the king all his 
 rights in Languedoc, which he was unable to defend 
 against the old house of Toulouse. Philip hesitated to 
 accept the important cession, and left the rival houses to 
 the continuance of a struggle carried feebly on by either 
 side. He at length expired, in 1223, after a reign of 
 forty-three years. This period of half a century was 
 one of uninterrupted progress to the French monarchy, 
 and to its sovereign power. Though much of this was 
 due to the age, to circumstances, and to the natural de- 
 velopment of the country's political system, still much 
 remains due to the personal character of Philip, to his 
 activity, his prudence, foresight, and courage. The 
 mere list of the provinces which he subdued and united 
 to the monarchy forms the fittest monument to his fame. 
 These were Normandy, Maine, Anjou, Touraine, and 
 Poitou, wrested from John ; Picardy and Auvergne, 
 won in the commencement of his reign ; Artois, acquired 
 by his marriage with Isabella of Hainault ; and, finally, 
 the influence over Languedoc which the crusaders 
 brought him, and which nothing but Philip's age and 
 declining strength prevented him from converting into 
 sovereignty. In minor matters the active spirit of 
 Philip Augustus equally displayed itself. He put the
 
 G'O HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1223. 
 
 police on an efficient footing ; he walled and paved 
 Paris and the principal towns under his sway ; he 
 built and fortified ; he encouraged literature by the 
 foundation of professorships ; improved the discipline of 
 the array ; and, with all his enterprises and expenses, 
 so ordered his finances as to leave a considerable trea- 
 sure at his death. 
 
 When Louis VIII. succeeded his father Philip on the 
 throne, it was remarked with joy by the lovers of le- 
 gitimacy, that he was descended by his mother, Isabella 
 of Hainault, from Charles of Lorraine, the last prince 
 of Charlemagne's blood, and that he thus united the 
 rights of Carlovingian and Capetian. He was feeble 
 in person, and is said not to have been endowed with 
 much capacity ; but the sage policy of Philip Augustus, 
 together with the impulse he had given to affairs, con- 
 tinued to direct them, and to render France triumphant 
 over her enemies. Henry III. lost the towns of Niort 
 and La Rochelle, and was driven by Louis from Poitou ; 
 yet so little did the English feel the loss of this province, 
 that it is scarcely noticed by the historians of the island. 
 The barons were so much occupied with jealousy of 
 their sovereign and of his power, that Henry could pro- 
 cure or send no aid to his French provinces. A feeble 
 expedition was at length fitted out, which preserved 
 Gascony to England, but recovered no part of the lost 
 province. 
 
 A singular cause of contention arose about this time 
 in Flanders. Baldwin, its last count, had been one of 
 the leaders of that crusade, which, in the commence- 
 ment of the century, took Constantinople from the 
 Greeks. He had been elected emperor of the East, and 
 had been the first of the Latin dynasty which reigned 
 over that city. Soon after, in the year 1205, he had 
 been taken prisoner by the Bulgarians, and had not since 
 been heard of. His daughter Jeanne succeeded to the 
 county of Flanders, and had married Ferrand, who had 
 opposed Philip Augustus, and who was taken prisoner 
 by that monarch at the battle of Bouvines. Jeanne
 
 1226. SIEGE OP AVION OX. 6l 
 
 took no steps to liberate her husband, or to pay his ran- 
 som, when an aged man appeared in Flanders, calling 
 himself count Baldwin, and giving an account of his 
 long captivity and recent escape from the Bulgarians. 
 Jeanne denied the identity of this person with her father ; 
 Louis VIII. was of the same opinion ; while Henry III. 
 treated and allied with him as the veritable Baldwin. 
 The self-entitled count appeared before king Louis at 
 Peronne, offering proofs of his identity ; but unfortu- 
 nately he could not recall the place where he had done 
 homage to Philip Augustus, nor the place where he had 
 been knighted, nor yet the place and day of his mar- 
 riage. Whether he really could not make answer to 
 these questions, or whether age had troubled his me- 
 mory, the old man was condemned as a pretender, and 
 the countess Jeanne soon after caused him to be hanged. 
 The common people still persisted in giving credit to his 
 identity with count Baldwin, and looked on Jeanne as 
 the murderer of her father. Henry III. in no way sup- 
 ported this his unfortunate ally. 
 
 The sovereignty over Languedoc was still undecided. 
 King Louis was anxious to undertake a crusade in that 
 country, with all the indulgences and advantages of a 
 warlike pilgrimage to the Holy Land. The hostilities 
 with England and the fickleness of the pope delayed 
 the execution of this purpose. Both obstacles were re- 
 moved at length. Amaury de Montfort being driven 
 from the conquests of his father by the sons of count 
 Raymond, re-animated the zeal of the pope and the old 
 crusaders. Amaury retired to Paris, and made cession of 
 his claims to king Louis, who, in return, promised him 
 the office of constable. A new crusade was preached 
 against the Albigenses ; and Louis marched towards 
 Languedoc at the head of a formidable army in the 
 spring of the year 1226. The town of Avignon had 
 proffered to the crusaders the facilities of crossing the 
 Rhone under her walls, but refused entry within them 
 to such an host. Louis, having arrived at Avignon, 
 insisted on passing through the town : the Avignonais
 
 Gl- HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1229- 
 
 laid, in the thirteenth century, the firmest foundations 
 of absolute power. 
 
 The French nobles were not yet reconciled to their 
 new state of dependence and subordination. The present 
 seemed a favourable opportunity for recovering their 
 influence. Louis IX. had not reached the age of twelve. 
 His mother, Blanche of Castile, assumed the regency. 
 A woman and a minor did not seem formidable enemies; 
 but Blanche was a person of capacity and firmness : all 
 their efforts proved unavailing against her. Peter duke 
 of Britany, surnamed Mauclerc, was the enemy that gave 
 her most trouble. Theobald count of Champagne was 
 another; a young knight of more gallantry than firmness. 
 He professed a tender and chivalresque devotion towards 
 queen Blanche, which some chroniclers have maliciously 
 construed. And certainly his conduct was capricious as 
 a lover now rising in insurrection and anger, the next 
 at the feet of the queen in abject submission, deserting 
 Peter of Britany and his other allies. These civil wars 
 led, however, to few important consequences. The ter- 
 mination of the war with the Albigenses, and the pacific- 
 ation, or it might be called the acquisition, of Languedoc, 
 was the chief act of queen Blanche's regency. 
 
 Louis VIII. had over-run the country without re- 
 sistance in his last campaign ; still, at his departure, 
 Raymond VII. again appeared, collected soldiers, and 
 continued to struggle against the royal lieutenant. For 
 upwards of two years he maintained himself; the atten- 
 tion of Blanche being occupied by the league of the 
 barons against her. The successes of Raymond VII., 
 accompanied by cruelties, awakened the vindictive zeal 
 of the pope. Languedoc was threatened with another 
 crusade ; Raymond was willing to treat, and make con- 
 siderable cessions, in order to avoid such extremities. 
 In April, 1229, a treaty was signed: in it the rights of 
 De Montfort were passed over. About two thirds of the 
 domains of the count of Toulouse were ceded to the king 
 of France ; the remainder was to fall, after Raymond's 
 death, to his daughter Jeanne, who by the same treaty
 
 1242. MARRIAGE OP THE PRINCES. 65 
 
 was to marry one of the royal princes : heirs failing them, 
 it was to revert to the crown. On these terms, with the 
 humiliating addition of a public penance, Raymond VII. 
 once more was allowed peaceable possession of Toulouse, 
 and of the part of his domains reserved to him. Al- 
 phonse, brother of Louis IX., married Jeanne of Tou- 
 louse soon after, and took the title of count of Poitiers; 
 that province being ceded to him in apanage. Robert, 
 another brother, was made count of Artois at the same 
 time. Louis himself married Margaret, the eldest daugh- 
 ter of Raymond Berenger count of Provence. Though 
 the king had nearly reached the age of one and twenty, 
 still queen Blanche was not less strict in her tutelage. 
 The young spouses were not allowed freely to enjoy each 
 other's company, and many of their meetings were 
 obliged to be stolen ones. Louis had been reared with 
 almost monkish rigidity, not only in reverence of re- 
 ligion and performance of its duties, but in the whole 
 conduct and views of life. Many dispositions might 
 have rebelled against this irksome discipline, and com- 
 pensated it by an unprincipled and licentious manhood. 
 Louis IX., however, remained unchanged. The same 
 rigid principle and sentiments, imbibed in childhood, 
 continued to regulate his acts and life, and obtained for 
 him the title of Saint Louis, by which he is more gene- 
 rally known. 
 
 The last of his barons that resisted the French king 
 was Hugh of Lusignan count de la Marche. He had 
 married Isabel, widow of king John of England, and 
 mother of Henry III. When Louis accompanied his 
 brother Alphonse to his county of Poitiers, and sum- 
 moned his vassals of these regions to attend his court 
 and do the customary homage, the dowager queen of 
 England felt mortified at thus being reduced to act a 
 subject's part. .She instigated her husband to rebel; 
 and the French princes, who had reached Poitiers in 
 perfect confidence, were obliged to sign a' disadvantage- 
 ous treaty ere they were allowed to escape. The count 
 de la Marche, elated by his success, formally renounced 
 
 VOL. I. F
 
 66 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1243. 
 
 his allegiance to Louis, formed a league of nobles, and 
 called on Henry III., his step-son, to support him. That 
 monarch did come with an army to his defence, whilst 
 Louis advanced to chastise the refractory vassal. The 
 two kings met on the banks of the Charente, at a castle 
 called Taillebourg, which commanded a bridge over the 
 river. Some negotiations went forward : and it appears 
 that the English, afraid of being surprised or betrayed, 
 abandoned the post in a panic and fled. They were 
 pursued by Louis, on the following day, to Saintes. A 
 battle ensued, in which Henry III. and the count de la 
 Marche were defeated. The latter, as well as his proud 
 wife, was compelled to submit to the conqueror. The 
 count of Toulouse had also been engaged in this re- 
 bellion : he submitted in time, however ; as did ah 1 the 
 great vassals, on learning the victory of Saintes. 
 
 Another marriage completed for the royal family the 
 acquisition of the south. A considerable portion of it 
 obeyed Raymond Berenger, as count of Provence. He 
 had no male heirs. Of his five daughters, the eldest 
 was queen of France; another queen of England. 
 Jealous of having his patrimonial country swallowed up 
 in a great kingdom, Raymond Berenger, by testament, 
 constituted his youngest daughter, Beatrix, his heir. It 
 was arranged that she should espouse Raymond count 
 of Toulouse, who would thus restore the fallen grandeur 
 of his house, and unite all the south beneath his sway. 
 These plans of Raymond were frustrated. Count Ray- 
 mond Berenger died unexpectedly. Charles count of 
 Anjou, Louis IX.'s youngest brother, became a suitor 
 of Beatrix, and advanced with an army to woo. Louis 
 seconded him. The Provencals, dreading more the enmity 
 of France than that of the count of Toulouse, favoured the 
 pretensions of the young prince ; and Charles, with the 
 hand of Beatrix, secured to himself the county of Provence. 
 
 Louis IX. was in the mean time diverted from plans 
 of policy and domestic aggrandisement. In the year 
 1244, he fell seriously ill at Pontoise, and was reduced 
 to the last extremity. Some of his attendants deemed
 
 1244. BATTLE OF GAZA. 67 
 
 him already dead. He recovered, however; and his 
 first words were a vow to take the cross and lead a 
 crusade against the infidels. No entreaties could dis- 
 suade him from this resolve ; and while yet on his bed 
 of sickness he received the cross from the bishop of 
 Paris. The events of the East were indeed such as to 
 call for the sympathy and aid of all Christian knights. 
 It was at this period that the Moguls had left the pas- 
 turages of Tartary, to over-run and spoil the nations of 
 the West. They had invaded Muscovy, Poland, and 
 had even penetrated into the dominions of the emperor 
 Frederic. The Greek empire was equally menaced by 
 them. The Khorasmians, a nation driven by the Mo- 
 guls from the east of the Caspian, and fleeing from their 
 conquerors, as the Goths from the Huns of old, flung 
 themselves upon Syria. The Saracens and the Chris- 
 tians of Syria leagued against the barbarians ; the cres- 
 cent and the cross fought for the first time in alliance; 
 it proved unfortunate. The Khorasmians defeated their 
 opponents on the plain of Gaza. More ruthless than 
 Saladin, they almost entirely destroyed the Knights 
 Templars and Hospitallers, and massacred all the 
 Christians of Jerusalem. Europe, during these re- 
 verses of her creed and sons, was convulsed with the 
 quarrel betwixt pope Innocent and the emperor Frederic. 
 The latter was most eager to fly to the relief of the 
 Holy Land ; but the pontiff, bent on his own selfish 
 schemes, his own views, and the church's aggrandise- 
 ment, was deaf to all offers and treaties of accommo- 
 dation. He sought to draw Louis into his party against 
 the emperor, and even undertook a journey to France 
 for that purpose ; when the illness and piety of the king 
 bound him in a vow, which he resolved not to neglect, 
 even for the exhortations or dispensations of the father 
 of the faithful. 
 
 The mind of Louis was henceforth bent on the cru- 
 sade, and the preparatives necessary. He made peace 
 with Henry III., formed alliances with all neighbouring 
 princes, and offered to restore any possessions that the 
 p 2
 
 68 HISTORY OF FKANCE. 1248. 
 
 crown had usurped. He induced the greater number of 
 his turbulent barons to accompany him; Peter of Britany 
 amongst the rest, the count of Toulouse, and Thibaud 
 count of Champagne, who, by inheritance, had become 
 king of Navarre. Thibaud, or Theobald, had not long 
 returned from an unfortunate crusade, which he had led 
 into the East : with him went his vassal Joinville, the 
 well known historian of St. Louis. The good king spared 
 no pains to enlist followers; he had even recourse to arti- 
 fice for that purpose, being necessitated to it by the decay 
 of that devotional and chivalresque zeal which alone had 
 furnished so many thousands to the early enterprises of 
 the kind. At Christmas it was the custom of great lords 
 to distribute new dresses to their followers; from whence 
 comes the word livree, livery. Louis prepared a great 
 number ; and inviting his courtiers to attend mass with 
 him before daybreak, mantles were distributed to them 
 previously. When day broke, and the sun's rays illu- 
 mined the church, each person was surprised, on looking 
 at his new mantle, to discover that the badge of the 
 cross was attached. They were ashamed to tear off the 
 sacred symbol, and thus found themselves tricked into 
 the warlike pilgrimage by the devout humour of the 
 monarch. 
 
 In August, 1248, Louis sailed from Aigues Mortes, 
 a port that himself had founded. He directed his course 
 to Cyprus, where Henry 'of Lusignan reigned, and 
 reached it in four and twenty days. The island was 
 the general rendezvous of the crusade. Louis wintered 
 there, collecting information, and forming plans for his 
 future campaign. 
 
 Instead of disembarking in Palestine, Louis formed 
 the project of attacking Egypt. The most powerful of 
 the Saracen chiefs reigned at Cairo. Syria, to use a 
 baronial expression, was in reality but a fief held under 
 the soldan of Egypt. To attack the latter was to aim 
 at the head, and to give the most deadly blow to Ma- 
 hometan power. In June, 124O, the crusading force, 
 filling 1800 vessels, mere boats we must suppose many
 
 1249- BATTLE OP MAXSOURAH. 69 
 
 of them, bearing nearly 3000 knights, with their war- 
 like and domestic suites, sailed from Cyprus. Their 
 first misadventure was to be assailed by a tempest, and 
 separated. Louis, however, arrived with a certain por- 
 tion of the fleet off Damietta. There was a show of 
 resistance. Many were against disembarking, but the 
 French king would not remain on board ; he sprang 
 ashore, himself among the foremost, to withstand the 
 charge of the Saracen cavalry, and routed them. Da- 
 mietta was found to be evacuated, and was occupied on 
 the following day. 
 
 The great object of the crusaders was the seizure of 
 Cairo, the soldan's capital, styled Babylon by the monk- 
 ish writers of the day. The rise of the Nile, however, 
 kept them for many months inactive at Damietta. It 
 was not until November that they began their march. 
 The lassitude endured under that burning climate caused 
 them to linger, and another month elapsed ere they reach- 
 ed Mansourah, not many leagues up the Nile. Here was 
 a canal or river to cross, called the Thanis. The Sara* 
 cens defended the passage; wooden fortifications were 
 raised on both sides ; but the crusaders suffered infinitely 
 more than their enemies, from the Greek fire with which 
 the latter assailed them. To the great joy of the French 
 a ford was discovered. King Louis's brother, Robert 
 count of Artois, passed it the next day. He took the 
 Saracens by surprise, routed them, and in the heat of vic- 
 tory pursued them rashly into the town of Mansourah. 
 Their chief was killed ; but in the narrow streets and em- 
 barrassed passages the Egyptians rallied. The count of 
 Artois, lord Salisbury, and Robert de Vere, who carried 
 the banner of England, were here slain : the grand master 
 of the Temple lost an eye. A thousand knights perished 
 in the rout, amongst whom were almost ah* the English. 
 After this defeat the project of advancing on Cairo was 
 abandoned. To retreat was equally difficult. A pesti- 
 lence seized on the army, and paralysed it. Ah 1 that 
 was left to the pious monarch to perform were his 
 prayers. 
 
 F 3
 
 70 HISTOKY OF FRANCE. 1254- 
 
 The retreat to Damietta was commenced after Easter, 
 but it was found impossible to accomplish it, so closely 
 were they pressed. In a few days the army and its chief 
 were prisoners. Every Christian under the rank of 
 knighthood had to choose between apostasy or death. 
 Such was the untoward consequence of a war under- 
 taken for the propagation of religious belief. 
 
 Another circumstance came to complicate the king's 
 disaster. The Mamelukes grew suddenly jealous of their 
 young sultan. He favoured his French prisoners, and 
 they suspected him of seeking to reserve their ransom to 
 himself. They conspired, attacked him in a tower, 
 and pursuing him thence into the Nile, where he had 
 flung himself, massacred him before the eyes of the 
 French. One of them tore out the victim's heart, and 
 presented it to the king, asking a reward for having 
 slain his enemy. This increased the difficulties of an 
 accommodation; but it was at last effected. Louis 
 restored Damietta as the price of his own ransom, pro- 
 mised 400,000 livres as that of his followers : the count 
 of Poitiers remained hostage for the fulfilment. A truce 
 was agreed on for ten years. 
 
 Louis, after his delivery, sailed for Palestine, deter- 
 mined to see his barons free ere he quitted the Levant. 
 The obligation of his vow held him also, perhaps, as 
 well as the shame of returning with the news of so dis- 
 astrous an expedition. Four years Louis sojourned in 
 Palestine, endeavouring to effect by policy that which he 
 had failed to accomplish by arms. He fortified Acre, 
 Sidon, Jaffa, and other principal towns held by the Latins. 
 He negotiated with the Arabs, and laboured to reconcile 
 the differences betwixt the chiefs of Syria. At length, 
 on learning the death of his mother, queen Blanche, who 
 had been regent in his absence, he sailed from Pales- 
 tine, arriving in France during the autumn of the year 
 1254. It was remarked, that amidst all the joy and 
 congratulations of his return, Louis preserved the aspect 
 of profound melancholy ; he would not admit of consol- 
 ation, listen to music or to gaiety. He still retained on
 
 1254. TUB PASTOUREAVX. 71 
 
 his habit the symbol of a crusader; thus marking that he 
 considered his vow as unaccomplished. He reproached 
 himself with the ill success of his expedition, as with a 
 crime. 
 
 The love and respect borne by his people to Louis 
 were not diminished by his reverses ; on the contrary, 
 his captivity excited general sympathy. The ardour to 
 avenge his indignities upon the infidel was general. 
 The devout opinions of that age, which saw the imme- 
 diate hand of Providence in every event, distributing 
 good fortune as the reward of piety, and disaster as the 
 punishment of infidelity, at once attributed the failure 
 of the crusade to the profligate lives of. the barons and 
 clergy. Both were considered unworthy to advance the 
 cause of heaven. It was for the innocent and the hum- 
 ble, for those untainted with the vices of the time, 
 luxury, avarice, violence, and pride, to come forth and 
 support the standard which they did not disgrace. The 
 same idea had formerly prevailed, when many thousands 
 of children were collected in a kind of crusading expe- 
 dition, and perished miserably. Shepherds were now 
 the class looked to as the fittest to recruit a divine army. 
 Numbers of these assembled, and were joined by the poor 
 and idle of all kinds. 
 
 Their first purpose was to combat the infidel and 
 rescue Louis. But the Pastoureaux, as they were called, 
 soon abandoned the conquest of the Saracen for the plun- 
 der and abuse of their betters at home. Their fanaticism 
 naturally adopted the popular tone of hatred to the 
 clergy, and distaste of their creed and yoke, which has 
 ever existed a smouldering fire, always quenched with 
 blood, at least in France, though never to utter extinc- 
 tion. MTienever the people rose by insurrection to 
 enjoy the free utterance of their opinions, these were 
 found to resemble the religious and political heresies of 
 the unfortunate Albigenses. By the measures of queen 
 Blanche, the Pastoureaux were exterminated, and their 
 chief slain as he was preaching publicly in the capital. 
 
 The death of Raymond count of Toulouse was another
 
 72 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1254. 
 
 event that took place during the absence of Louis. The 
 king's brother Alphonse, who had married Jeanne, suc- 
 ceeded to the peaceable possession and dignity of the 
 counts of Toulouse. Thus two of the royal princes 
 divided the south betwixt them : Charles of Anjou pos- 
 sessing Provence, or the eastern portion bordering on the 
 Rhone ; Alphonso the western. They united their forces 
 in a war against the free cities of their region. Avignon 
 was reduced, and Aries; Marseilles itself submitted: 
 but it does not appear that any were harshly treated, or 
 deprived of their privileges and franchises. 
 
 The remainder of St. Louis's reign is marked by few 
 incidents, although it forms the most important epoch in 
 the legislative history of France. The monarch, as he 
 advanced in years, became still more absorbed in reli- 
 gious views and scruples. He came to have no other 
 maxim of policy than the preservation of his own soul, 
 and that of his fellow men. He consulted his conscience 
 rather than his ministers, and preferred its counsels to 
 those even of prudence or of patriotism. Such un- 
 worldly policy was likely to lead to most foolish acts. 
 He had promised, on setting out for the crusade, to 
 restore all that the kings of France had usurped. 
 Henry III. of England claimed Normandy and Poitou in 
 accomplishment of the offer, and Louis for a moment 
 meditated ceding them : but the impolicy of the act 
 struck him, as well as its justice. He could not recon- 
 cile his duties as Christian and as sovereign ; he deter- 
 mined in consequence to abdicate the throne, and to enter 
 a cloister. It was with difficulty he was dissuaded from 
 the resolve, and brought to reign according to less 
 rigid maxims of political honesty. He made peace, how- 
 ever, with Henry, and ceded to him the provinces of 
 Perigord, the Limousin, the Agenois, and a part of 
 Saintonges. In return Henry abandoned his right to 
 Normandy and Poitou. 
 
 The good sense of Louis in this instance overcame the 
 absurdity of monastic notions, and prevailed over the nar- 
 row precepts of his conscience and confessor. His views
 
 1255. LAW OP ST. LOUIS. 73 
 
 enlarged ; they opened to the wide prospects of philan- 
 thropy; and in lieu of confining himself to the observ- 
 ance of ascetic, I had nearly said of selfish duties, the 
 monarch gave himself to the more noble task of amelior- 
 ating the condition of his people. The ttablissemens 
 of St. Louis, as his laws are called, form the earliest 
 considerable attempt at legislation in France. The first 
 of them was directed against the right of priyajgjga^ 
 asserted and practised by the DarOn's. It' established, 
 after the commission of any crime or act of violence, 
 forty days of truce to be observed towards the relatives 
 and friends of the criminal. This obliged the retalia- 
 tion or vengeance to be personally confined to the of- 
 fender, and not, as usual, extended to his kin and clan. 
 This ordinance, known by the name of quarantaine le 
 rot, was succeeded by the total abolition of the right of 
 private war. Subsequent monarchs, however, unable to 
 enforce the latter prohibitions, were content with up- 
 holding the former. The duel, or judicial combat, was 
 another relic of barbarism and violence that St. Louis 
 attacked by his enactments. The legists, his new coun- 
 sellors, the modern lords of parliament and of the judica- 
 ture, evidently dictated these ameliorations. Versed in 
 the pandects and the Roman law, the licence and inde- 
 pendence of feudal customs were odious to them. They 
 swept all these away, substituting for intricate rights 
 and turbulent privileges their own processes and verdicts. 
 St. Louis has been lauded and censured for having, 
 through them, undermined the power of the aristocracy, 
 and for having converted a government, originally feudal 
 and free, into an absolute monarchy. But Louis, with 
 all his sagacity, saw not whither his enactments tended. 
 He issued them more from a love of order, and from 
 principles of piety, than from any Machiavelian craft or 
 kingly policy. Even his legal counsellors may share 
 this exculpation. They did but labour in the spirit of 
 their calling. What most detracted from the influence of 
 the barons was net the object of an express law. This 
 was, chawing away the trying of causes from them and
 
 74 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1255. 
 
 their courts to those of the royal judges and the parlia- 
 ment. It was effected tacitly and gradually. Appeals 
 were encouraged ; cases in which they were allowed 
 were extended and multiplied ; and the lower and mid- 
 dling orders were taught to look to their sovereign for 
 that impartial justice and protection, which they could 
 not expect from the very noble with whom they were 
 perhaps in litigation. 
 
 Another of the enactments of Louis showed, what was 
 still less to be expected of him, his resistance to the 
 usurpation and pernicious immunities of the church. 
 Here the hand of the legists is clearly seen, defending 
 their jurisdiction against that of the clergy, and declar- 
 ing their law and its royal source independent of the 
 Holy See, its canons and decretals. In the year 1268, 
 was published an edict called the Pragmatic Sanction, 
 which is considered as the foundation of the liberties of 
 the Gallican church. This declares the right of colla- 
 tors to benefices, of cathedral churches, and of such 
 as enjoyed the privilege of electing their superior, to 
 be independent of the pope ; that all church preferment 
 and promotion shall be guided by ancient custom, de- 
 spite of any modern decree issuing from Rome. It 
 restricts in the same manner the money levied in the 
 kingdom for the papal treasury. The words of the edict 
 are simple enough, and moderate ; but in the reading, the 
 French legists afterwards took care to construe it so as 
 to oppose and frustrate every attempt at exaction or 
 usurpation on the part of the Holy See. It is singular 
 that the most formidable bulwark against the grasping 
 pretensions of the popedom, should have been raised by 
 the only monarch of Christendom whose virtues and 
 piety have placed him on the saintly calendar. 
 
 England and France, those restless neighbours, re- 
 mained at peace during these years. He.nry III. was 
 engaged in a struggle with his barons, headed by Simon 
 de Montfort earl of Leicester, a descendant of the con- 
 queror of the Albigenses. Louis IX. never took advantage 
 of the weakness of the rival kingdom or monarch, and
 
 1255. NAPLES CONVEYED TO THE HOUSE OF ANJOU. 75 
 
 did not interfere except with his good offices. In 1264-, 
 both parties referred their cause to his arbitration. The 
 king held his court at Amiens for the purpose, and 
 patiently heard the pleas on both sides. With all his 
 sense of justice, it was not, however, to be hoped that a 
 monarch could give an impartial verdict in a cause 
 where monarchy and liberty were at issue. Louis de- 
 cided against the English barons, ordering, that all his 
 castles and powers should be restored to Henry. This 
 " equitable sentence," as Hume calls it, was not sub- 
 mitted to by the barons ; and the civil war in England 
 was in no wise allayed or terminated by Louis's arbi- 
 tration. 
 
 About the period of the king's departure for the 
 crusade, Italy and Germany were convulsed by the 
 deadly quarrel between the pope and the emperor Fre- 
 deric II. This monarch died soon after at Ferentino. 
 The pope's enmity was continued against his son Conrad, 
 who died suddenly in 1254, poisoned, as some suppose. 
 He left a son, Conradin, then but three years of age, the 
 last relic of the house of Suabia. Manfred, the natural 
 son of Frederic, held possession of Naples, and defied 
 all the efforts of the pope to drive him thence. Innocent 
 IV. had promised Naples to a prince of Parma, if he 
 succeeded in subduing Manfred. Alexander IV., his 
 successor, transferred this promise to Edmund, second 
 son of Henry III., who contributed all the money he 
 could raise to the conquest of a new kingdom, at a time 
 when he could scarcely retain the one over which he 
 reigned. Manfred, however, was still successful ; and 
 the pope felt the necessity of raising up a more power- 
 ful competitor. He despatched an envoy, offering the 
 kingdom of Naples to St. Louis. The good king would 
 not consent to usurp the right of the young Conradin ; 
 but when his brother, Charles of Anjou, whose ambition 
 was not contented with the country of Provence, lately 
 acquired by him in marriage, offered himself as the con- 
 queror and sovereign of Naples, Louis would not inter- 
 fere. He left Charles to act with his own resources;
 
 76 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1270. 
 
 and this prince formed a treaty with the pope to the 
 effect proposed. A crusade, the usual pontifical resource, 
 was preached against Manfred ; and a large French 
 army marched under the united banners of the cross 
 and of Charles to the conquest of Naples. Manfred, at 
 the head of his troops, a great number of whom were 
 Saracens, met his rival in the plain of Grandella. One 
 
 , battle decided the war. Manfred bravely perished in 
 
 '. the field : Charles of Anjou and the French remained 
 masters of Sicily and Naples. Such was the commence- 
 ment of those conquests in Italy, which continued so 
 long the object of French ambition, and of which the 
 first brilliant results were always doomed to end in sub- 
 
 sequent disappointment and defeat. 
 
 TVTiile Christians, calling themselves crusaders, and 
 
 'so constituted by the pontiff, were thus engaged in 
 slaughtering their brethren, tidings arrived that Palestine 
 had been invaded by the soldan of Egypt ; that Cesarea, 
 and, at last, Antioch itself, had fallen. Upwards of 
 100,000 Christians had been put to the sword, or 
 sold to slavery. Europe was thus periodically frighted 
 from apathy, and roused to enthusiam and vengeance, by 
 some fearful calamity in the East. Louis IX. was deeply 
 moved ; and, despite of his feebleness and age, instantly 
 undertook to head another crusade. His relatives and 
 nobles, even the pope himself, endeavoured to dissuade 
 him; but to no purpose. He employed three years in 
 preparation. It was in this interval that Naples was 
 invaded by young Conradin, the last prince of the house 
 of Suabia. Charles of Anjou advanced to defend his 
 newly-acquired kingdom, and defeated his rival in battle. 
 Conradin was taken, and instantly sent by his ruthless 
 conqueror to perish on the scaffold. 
 
 St. Louis embarked with his three sons and a con- 
 siderable army at Aigues Mortes, in July, 1270. Pales- 
 tine or Egypt was considered to be the object of the 
 expedition. The king surprised his followers by de- 
 claring his intention of disembarking at Tunis. The 
 l>ious king's object was said to be ; the assurances he had
 
 1270. DEATH OP ST. LOUIS. 77 
 
 received of the willingness of the king of Tunis to become 
 Christian. Charles of Anjou had also an object in con- 
 quering that district of Africa, which was immediately 
 opposite to his kingdom of Sicily. Whatever was the 
 expectation, it was not fulfilled. Omar king of Tunis, 
 instead of welcoming Louis as an apostle, prepared to 
 oppose him as an invader. The French effected a land- 
 ing, however, and in a few days attacked and took what 
 is called the castle of Carthage. The ancient rival of 
 Rome still existed as a town, and was defended by two 
 hundred men. Louis established himself within its walls, 
 and was soon besieged there by the Tunisians. The 
 plague, a more formidable enemy than man, at the same 
 time attacked the French. Numbers of the chiefs of the 
 expedition fell immediate victims to it. The king and 
 his sons caught the infection. One of the latter, the 
 count of Nevers, died. Louis lay twenty-two days ex- 
 tended on his couch of death, displaying that patience, 
 piety, and presence of mind, which have given him 
 in history the mingled character of a great man and a 
 saint. In his dying moments he caused himself to be 
 removed from his couch and placed upon ashes. In 
 this situation he expired. 
 
 The character of St. Louis is one of the noblest 
 that occurs in modern history. He possessed all the 
 virtues of his age, untarnished by its vices : he was 
 brave without cruelty or violence, pious without bigotry 
 or weakness. Although more the hero of the legend 
 than of romance, he commands our admiration by his 
 rare disinterestedness, his bold attempt to rule his 
 actions as a monarch by the rigid maxims of private 
 honour, and by the great good sense that tempered his 
 devotion, and that never allowed him to sacrifice hu- 
 manity or justice to the interests even of that church 
 which he revered. There was one defect in his cha- 
 racter, however, rendered more striking when we com- 
 pare him with another saint and hero, Charlemagne * : 
 
 * The fact of Thomas Aquinas dining and being familiar with Louis is 
 scarcely in contradiction to this censure.
 
 78 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1270. 
 
 this was his neglect of letters ; shown not only by the 
 silence of history as to his reading and acquirements, 
 but by the fact that the education of his son and suc- 
 cessor Philip was utterly neglected. Even his monkish 
 contemporaries found the ignorance of the prince " la- 
 mentable," and his reign corroborates the assertion. 
 
 Robert, the youngest son of St. Louis, was count of 
 Clermont ; he married the heiress of the county of 
 Bourbon, and took that title. Although disordered in 
 his intellect from a blow received at a tournament, he 
 left a numerous progeny. His descendants succeeded 
 to the throne of France, which they still occupy, in the 
 person of Henry IV. 
 
 Philip III. or the Hardy, called so apparently from 
 no other cause than that of having survived the war 
 and pestilence of Tunis, was still sick when St. Louis 
 expired. The conduct of the army devolved on Charles 
 of Anjou, who by a treaty put an end to the war. 
 Philip journeyed through Italy accompanied by five 
 coffins, those of his father, brother, brother-in-law, 
 wife, and son. It was during this journey that Henry, 
 nephew of Henry III. of England, was assassinated by 
 Guy de Montfort in the church of Viterbo. 
 
 The principal, almost the only, events of the reign of 
 Philip the Hardy sprung from the rivalry of the royal 
 families of France and Aragon : that of Castile also 
 mingled in the quarrel ; but all the circumstances are 
 far too minute and unimportant to be given. The suc- 
 cession of the counts of Champagne to the crown of 
 Navarre has been mentioned. Henry the last king left 
 a daughter, who, as heiress of that powerful house, was 
 sought by many competitors; amongst others, by the 
 prince of Aragon. As yet but a child, her mother fled 
 with her to the court of France, where being brought 
 up, she was afterwards married to Philip the Hardy's 
 son, and thus brought her rich heritage to swell that of 
 the French crown. The king of Aragon was of course 
 wroth at this abduction ; and other causes contributed 
 to aggravate his enmity. France, however, was not the
 
 1282. SICILIAN VESPERS. 79 
 
 most vulnerable point for attacking the French. The 
 followers of Charles of Anjou, since their conquest of 
 Sicily and Naples, had conducted themselves so as to 
 excite the discontent and hatred of a vindictive people. 
 Peter of Aragon received the Sicilian exiles with the 
 greatest friendship ; amongst the rest, John of Procida, 
 their chief. He incited these malcontents to avenge 
 themselves, and promised them his support. John of 
 Procida passed over to Sicily, where, in the disguise of 
 a Franciscan friar, he prepared measures of revolt and 
 vengeance. On Easter day, 1282, when the church bells 
 sounded for vespers at Palermo, the Sicilians rushed on 
 all the French they could meet, and massacred them 
 with every aggravation of cruelty. The same scene was 
 imitated and repeated all through the island. Eight 
 thousand French are said to have perished in this mas- 
 sacre, well known by the name of the Sicilian vespers. 
 Peter of Aragon soon after arrived in Sicily with a 
 fleet and army. Charles, who had hurried from Naples 
 to avenge his countrymen, was compelled to retreat with 
 the loss of his fleet ; and Sicily was not only lost to the 
 house of Anjou, but the Aragonese began to pass the 
 strait and to establish themselves in Calabria. The 
 anger of the two competitors was not satisfied in the 
 field ; they exchanged insults and defiances, and chal- 
 lenged each other to single combat. Bordeaux was fixed 
 as the rendezvous, and Edward I., a neutral monarch, 
 was to guard the field, and guarantee the princely duel- 
 lists from unfair advantage. This chivalresque mode 
 of settling their differences never took effect ; Edward 
 refused to sanction it : and although Charles of Anjou 
 made his appearance at the time and place appointed, 
 Peter came but to enter his protest and instantly dis- 
 appear. 
 
 Philip the Hardy took up the quarrel of his uncle 
 Charles. He made immense preparations, resolving to 
 overwhelm his enemy, and entered Spain with a nu- 
 merous army. He advanced, however, no farther than 
 Gerona, which he took, and thence was compelled to
 
 80 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1285. 
 
 retreat. A fever, the consequence of disappointment 
 and fatigue, seized upon Philip, and he expired at Per- 
 pignan, in October, 1285. The rival princes, Charles 
 of Anjou and Peter of Aragon, died the same year. 
 
 Little is known of the internal state of France or of 
 its court during the reign of Philip. From Matthew 
 Paris and Joinville to Froissart, there is a breach in 
 the succession of chroniclers ill filled up by the dry 
 pages of William of Nangis. History had, in fact, 
 outgrown its, ancient scope. Provinces were lost in 
 kingdoms ; barons and counts in royalty : wars, from 
 provincial quarrels, became national ones. To compre- 
 hend this wide field, and follow the march of such 
 events, became impossible for a monk ; the information 
 of the cloister no longer sufficed : history henceforward 
 demanded the pen of the statesman or the warrior ; and 
 such were not always found, possessed of the leisure 
 and the learning requisite for the task. 
 
 There is, nevertheless, one domestic circumstance of 
 Philip's reign preserved to us. It seems that he ho- 
 noured with his peculiar favour Pierre de la Brosse, a 
 chirurgeon-barber of St. Louis, who became chamberlain 
 to the king. The ignoble favourite was of course the 
 object of hatred and jealousy to the court, and to the 
 queen also, who endeavoured to counteract his influence. 
 Pierre de la Brosse made use on his side of insinuations 
 against the queen ; and the king's eldest son Louis dying 
 somewhat suddenly, poison was whispered to be the 
 cause. Pierre de la Brosse was the origin of the report 
 that the queen sought to remove her step-sons, in order 
 to make room for her own. His boldness or his male- 
 volence, which, cannot be decided, proved fatal to 
 the favourite : he was tried by a commission, and hanged 
 on the common gibbet at Montfaucon. 
 
 Philip the Fair, the fourth monarch of his name, 
 succeeded at the age of seventeen to the vacant throne. 
 The retreat and disasters of the French army might, at 
 any other time, have proved most fatal to the monarchy; 
 but neighbouring kingdoms were not then actuated by
 
 1285. PHILIP THE FAIR. 81 
 
 any rivalry towards France. Roclolph of Hapsburg, the 
 ancestor of the present house of Austria, lately called by 
 his merits from the humble station of a private knight 
 to the imperial crown, was busied with establishing his 
 power and family in the east of Germany. Edward I. 
 of England, though he showed himself ambitious and 
 usurping towards the Welsh and Scotch, preserved to- 
 wards France a kind of paternal forbearance and pro- 
 tection. Instead of taking advantage of Philip's youth 
 or misfortunes, he came to Paris to do him homage, 
 proffered his services as arbitrator to settle the differ- 
 ences betwixt France and Aragon, and sincerely laboured 
 to bring about a peace. The causes of quarrel were 
 complicated, and rendered adjustment so difficult, that 
 ten years elapsed before a final treaty was concluded. 
 Charles II. of Naples, son of Charles of Anjou, was a 
 prisoner to the king of Aragon. Edward induced the 
 latter to release him on divers conditions, which, though 
 sworn to solemnly, were of course broken. War con- 
 tinued, in the mean time, languidly. In conclusion, 
 Sicily was nominally restored by treaty to the house of 
 Anjou, but really kept possession of by Frederic of 
 Aragon, brother of the reigning monarch. Charles of 
 Naples at the same time ceded his county of Anjou to 
 Charles of Valois, king Philip's brother, contenting him- 
 self w r ith Provence and Naples. 
 
 Philip the Fair very much resembled his ancestor 
 Philip Augustus in character. Both having succeeded 
 young to the throne, entertained a high idea of their 
 prerogative ; and hence were proud, irritable, over- 
 bearing, rapacious. Both added craft to violence ; and 
 whilst they overwhelmed inferiors, they spoiled and 
 cheated the more powerful by artifice and falsehood. 
 The two monarchs made use of law as their favourite 
 weapon : lawyers were the chief counsellors and minis- 
 ters of Philip the Fair. Philip Augustus redeemed his 
 habits of crooked policy by valour in the field : the 
 victory won by him at Bovines procured for him the 
 name of hero. Philip the Fair was not so successful; 
 
 VOL. i. o
 
 82 HISTORY OF FKANCB. 
 
 his propensities were those of the statesman rather than 
 of the warrior. 
 
 Notwithstanding the friendly and disinterested conduct 
 of Edward I. towards France, Philip was jealous of that 
 monarch. He saw with pain that Edward was rounding 
 and completing his dominions at home, by the conquest 
 of Scotland and of Wales. The French king sought to 
 follow the example; and he accordingly laboured and 
 intrigued to win the affections of Edward's subjects of 
 Guienne. Thirty-five years of peace had now existed 
 betwixt England and France; but points of rivalry, 
 casual insults, and collisions, could not fail to keep alive 
 and stir up, from time to time, the natural jealousy of 
 neighbours and rivals. For some of these causes, true 
 or pretended, Philip summoned Edward to appear and 
 answer before the parliament of Paris. The latter, 
 occupied with the Scotch war, replied more in a tone of 
 expostulation than of anger. He sent his brother Ed- 
 mund to Paris to satisfy these griefs. The politic Philip 
 pretended to be grievously insulted and hurt in his feudal 
 rights by the insults he had received from the people of 
 Guienne ; his honour was piqued, as he affected, more 
 than his interest was concerned. He demanded that one 
 or two of his officers should be admitted, with merely 
 nominal power, into the chief towns of that duchy. It 
 was at the same time proposed, that Edward should 
 marry Margaret, Philip's sister, and that Guienne should 
 be the heritage of the offspring of the marriage. Ed- 
 ward, who sagely valued such a province as Scotland 
 or Wales far more than those continental ones, which 
 he was reduced to hold in fief, agreed to these con- 
 ditions; and, in drawing up the stipulations, was 
 not keen enough in mistrusting the legal counsellors 
 of Philip. The consequence was, that missives were 
 issued for delivering up the chief towns of Guienne to 
 the French; who were no sooner in possession of them, 
 than Philip threw off the mask, and, instead of fulfilling 
 the conditions of the treaty, summoned Edward afresh 
 to appear before his parliament of Paris. War remained
 
 1297- FLANDERS CONQUERED. 83 
 
 as the only alternative : but it was languidly carried on. 
 Edward was engaged at home with Baliol and Bruce. 
 The monarch and barons of England had ceased, in a 
 great measure, to be French. It was on this occasion 
 that, on Edward's ordering the earl of Hereford to 
 Guienne, he added, seeing the earl's reluctance, " Sir 
 earl, by God, you shall either go or hang ! " and Here- 
 ford replied, " By God, sir king ! I will neither go nor 
 hang." It had been well for England, if her future 
 monarchs and nobles had persevered in that disregard of 
 foreign possessions which marked Edward's conduct as 
 well as Hereford's. Still the former was not pusillanimous 
 enough to abandon his rights : he excited continental 
 princes against Philip, whilst he devoted himself to the 
 pursuit of his advantageous and peculiar policy at home. 
 
 One of Edward's projects was to obtain Philippa, 
 daughter of Guy de Dampierre count of Flanders, for 
 his son ; a large dowry, Flanders being then the richest 
 country in Europe, and a powerful ally would thus be 
 gained. But Philip intervened with his wonted craft: 
 he sent word to the count of Flanders, that he should 
 feel insulted unless Philippa visited Paris on her way to 
 London ; expressing, at the same time, no objection to 
 the match. When the daughter of the count of Flan- 
 ders, however, arrived in obedience to the monarch's 
 invitation, she was immediately conducted to prison ; 
 and the English prince was thus baulked of his bride. 
 The count renounced his allegiance in consequence ; but 
 Philip, invading Flanders with an army, compelled him 
 to submit. Finally, he was made prisoner, and the 
 county of Flanders annexed for the time to the crown. 
 Philip had leagued with the Scotch, and Edward with 
 the Flemish ; but both monarchs abandoned their allies 
 respectively to each other. 
 
 Whilst Philip made princes and nobles feel the weight 
 of his injustice, he was no less oppressive to the com- 
 monalty from his exactions. Two Florentines, whom 
 he consulted and trusted as financiers, brought to the 
 royal employ the arts of private cunning and experience. 
 o 2
 
 84 nisronv OF FRANCE, 1302. 
 
 All foreign merchants were seized in one day, terrified 
 into paying a large fine, and then banished the kingdom. 
 The Jews were similarly treated. The contributions 
 levied on the towns or communes, in which all wealth 
 now began to concentrate, were swelled by every possible 
 expedient. This, though a source of great oppression, 
 might have proved the commencement of public liberty. 
 The burgesses or tiers 6tat were called to assemble, in 
 order to give their consent to new taxes. The same 
 custom began in England about the very same time : 
 with what different fate and consequences the institution 
 was attended in the different kingdoms, is known to 
 every one. The towns of Flanders were far more ad- 
 vanced than those of France in wealth and independ- 
 ence ; they were turbulent and jealous under their counts; 
 and Philip was welcomed at Bruges and Ghent as a de- 
 liverer. But when the French monarch, or his lieu- 
 tenant, commenced in his new province the system of 
 exaction and violence practised in France, the Flemish 
 rebelled, all the French were massacred at Bruges, and 
 a grandson of the captive count was called to head the 
 insurgents. Robert d'Artois marched with the army of 
 Philip to chastise them. The Flemings posted them- 
 selves at Courtray, behind a canal. The impetuosity 
 of the French did not allow them to reconnoitre ; they 
 charged into the canal ; and in the confusion that ensued, 
 were put to the rout and slaughtered by the Flemings. 
 Robert d'Artois himself, and many of the first nobles of 
 France, perished in the action. This defeat punished 
 Philip, and took from him all the advantages of his 
 mean policy. Bordeaux rebelled ; he was obliged to 
 make peace with England, and restore Aquitaine to 
 Edward. A serious quarrel with the pope at the same 
 time came to occupy and trouble him. He afterwards 
 gained two battles over the Flemings ; but the populous 
 and stubborn province instantly opposed a fresh army to 
 Philip. The artizans of Ghent, Bruges, Ypres, and the 
 other towns, abandoned their callings, " to die in battle," 
 as they vowed, " rather than live in servitude." The
 
 1303. POPE BONIFACE SEIZED. 85 
 
 French king, thus convinced of the impracticability of 
 subduing the Flemings, granted them peace, liberating 
 and acknowledging the son of Guy de Dampierre as 
 count of Flanders. The river Lys was declared the 
 boundary of France and Flanders. 
 
 The most inveterate enemy of Philip was pope Bo- 
 niface VIII., Cajetan by name. Pontiff and monarch 
 were equally haughty, irritable, and possessed with high 
 ideas of their sovereign power. A tenth that Philip 
 raised on his clergy without the pope's consent, and a 
 refusal of the French king to abide by the arbitration of 
 Boniface betwixt him and England, were the first causes 
 of rupture. The pope sent a French bishop as legate 
 to expostulate ; the bishop took the opportunity to insult 
 his sovereign. Philip in revenge ordered his lawyers 
 to indict the bishop ; and crimes were soon raked up 
 wherewith to accuse him : heresy, sorcery, atheism, 
 those vague crimes so easily imputed and so difficultly 
 proved, were instantly laid to the prelate's charge. He 
 was arrested and imprisoned to answer it. The pope 
 was wroth, and menaced the king with excommunication. 
 The latter called a council, and commanded his lawyer 
 favourites to accuse the pope as they had accused the 
 bishop ; and immediately the same charges of heresy 
 and infidelity were brought against the pontiff. But 
 it was difficult to bring the head of the church be- 
 fore a tribunal of Philip's choosing, or to hope to have 
 him condemned upon such a mendacious and impudent 
 accusation. The king, therefore, employed one of his 
 agents, also a man of law, to excite a conspiracy against 
 the pope. He united with the Colonnas, levied an 
 armed troop, and surprised Boniface at his country re- 
 treat in Anagni. Making themselves masters of his 
 guards and person, they bound, insulted, and menaced 
 him. The pontiff bared his neck to their swords, but 
 they feared to strike ; and even found that to bring him 
 away captive was impracticable. At length a body of 
 the faithful subjects of Boniface rose and delivered hira 
 from the conspirators. The vengeance of Philip was 
 o 3
 
 86 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1305. 
 
 complete, however, despite of this rescue. Boniface died 
 soon after of a fever caused by the indignities, the 
 hunger, and privations he had suffered. 
 
 The events of the reign of Philip the Fair form but 
 a series of acts of injustice. He was called the Faux 
 Monnoyeur, or falsifier of coin, from his continual 
 tampering with the standard. He frequently ordered 
 the coin and plate of his subjects to be brought to his 
 mint, and paid for it in new coin so much debased, that 
 the marc of silver, from being worth only two livres 
 fifteen sous, came to be worth eight francs eight sous 
 of the debased coin. When the king's purpose was 
 answered, and his engagements discharged, he decried 
 his own coin. This caused an insurrection in Paris : the 
 mob attacked the palace of the Temple, where the king 
 lodged, and menaced his person. But the police had 
 been too well regulated : the royal archers and ser- 
 geants dispersed the mob, seized the ringleaders, and 
 hung them to the trees in and around the capital. 
 
 Resentment had carried Philip the Fair, in his attack 
 upon pope Boniface, far beyond the bounds of prudence. 
 He dreaded the retaliation and just enmity of a suc- 
 ceeding pontiff, and laboured with all his might to bring 
 about an election favourable to France. The king's 
 crime was, however, viewed with too much horror in 
 Italy. Benedict XI. was elected pope ; and he pre- 
 pared to excommunicate those who had attacked Bo- 
 niface at Anagni. Philip took the alarm, and pope 
 Benedict was opportunely destroyed by poison adminis- 
 tered in a plate of figs. A new conclave was summoned, 
 in which the two parties were found to be equally ba- 
 lanced in numbers, as well as in violence and hate. 
 They remained confined, as is the custom until a pope 
 is chosen. Nine months elapsed without hope of agree- 
 ment. At length it was arranged that the anti-gallican 
 party should choose three prelates, and that the oppo- 
 site side was to select one of the three. Three prelates, 
 noted enemies to Philip, were designated. Information 
 of this was despatched to the French monarch. Amongst
 
 1307- THE TEMPLARS DISSOLVED. 87 
 
 the three was Bertram! tie Goth, archbishop of Bordeaux : 
 he was immediately sent for by Philip, who showed 
 him that he was master of the election, and could ensure 
 the elevation of the archbishop, provided the latter 
 would become his partisan. Bertram! de Goth grasped 
 at the high offer, and refused no terms : he promised to 
 fulfil five demands that the king made of him, amongst 
 which one was to condemn the memory of Boniface and 
 exculpate his assaulters ; and another to grant a sixth, 
 which Philip reserved the liberty of thereafter specify- 
 ing. Bertrand de Goth became pope Clement V. in 
 consequence of this intrigue. To be near his patron 
 Philip, he fixed the pontifical court first at Poitiers, and 
 finally at Avignon. 
 
 No monarch was more successful or more ruthless in 
 his revenge than Philip the Fair. His most signal act 
 of this kind was the destruction of the order of Knights 
 Templars. History does not inform us of the origin of 
 the monarch's hatred towards this body ; avarice, the 
 cause generally assigned, is not sufficient. But there 
 was a rage at that time for judicial processes ; it was the 
 fearful amusement of the age, as judicial combat and 
 tournament had been in more warlike periods. Philip 
 and his lawyers could not rest without some great cri- 
 minal prosecution, some mysterious inquest. His object 
 in seizing pope Boniface had been to drag him before 
 a council, to accuse, and judge him. The monarch and 
 his counsellors were disappointed in this ; and they 
 singled out the Templars, against whom some vague 
 charges of scandal gave sufficient plea. When the 
 Templars were despatched, Philip, having no living an- 
 tagonist to accuse, attacked the dead Boniface with his 
 lawyers and pleadings. 
 
 On the 13th of October, 1307, the Templars were 
 seized in all parts of France ; the grand master and 
 sixty knights in Paris : they were thrown into prison, 
 and all the possessions of the order confiscated. The 
 most abominable charges were brought against them ; 
 those of committing the most indecent of crimes, of 
 G 4
 
 88 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1313. 
 
 worshipping a head, spitting on the cross, and avowing 
 infidelity. Torturing the accused, and promising him 
 pardon if he confessed, were the chief and only modes 
 of proof. Many, in order to escape torment, confessed 
 what their torturers put into their mouths ; and these 
 avowals were considered conclusive of their guilt. Fifty- 
 nine Templars were burnt in Paris ; a proportional 
 number in the provinces. Clement V., in obedience to 
 Philip, abolished the order. 
 
 It is here melancholy to reflect, that the cruel and san- 
 guinary spirit of barbarism, which the natural progress 
 of civilisation had been softening from the tenth to the 
 thirteenth century, should during the latter period have 
 been re-awakened by the agency of two principles most 
 averse from violence or blood these are religion and 
 law. The church, by its persecutions and burnings of 
 the Albigenses and other heretics* lawyers, by their 
 adopting the torture and other legal customs of the in- 
 quisition, as well as by their blind servility to royal power, 
 accustomed the people to see blood shed juridically for 
 trifling or for no causes. The great, for the same reason, 
 came to have still less respect for human life. He who 
 dared to be the foe or the opponent of a prince expiated 
 his crime, for such it was considered, with death. The 
 observance of certain forms of justice seemed to give full 
 excuse for dispensing with the spirit. The three fol- 
 lowing centuries of blind law and religious bigotry sur- 
 pass the times of Brunehaut or Domitian in bloodshed 
 and violence. Murders and assassinations, hitherto rare, 
 begin to thicken on us, and the pages of history become 
 for a long period disgustingly smeared with blood. 
 
 The last important act of Philip was his annexing the 
 town of Lyons to the kingdom of France. The emperor 
 was the nominal sovereign, the archbishop the actual 
 ruler. Philip interfered betwixt the latter and the 
 townspeople, and usurped the sovereignty of the town, 
 then, as now, the second of the kingdom in importance. 
 
 * John XXII. burned hundreds of both sexes for the crime of professing 
 absolute poverty.
 
 1314. PARLIAMENT AT PARIS. 89 
 
 When the venerable James de Molay, grand master 
 of the Temple, was brought to execution, he was said to 
 have uttered, amidst protestations of his innocence, a 
 solemn summons to his chief accusers, king Philip and 
 pope Clement, to appear before the throne of the Almighty, 
 one in forty days, the other in the space of a year and a 
 day. They died within these periods respectively. Philip 
 expired at Fontainebleau in November, 1314. 
 
 Notwithstanding the cruel and crafty character which 
 the acts of his reign stamp upon Philip the Fair, still 
 much that is beneficial owes its origin to him. The par- 
 liament, a court of judicature, was established and fixed 
 at Paris : personal servitude was abolished by a decree ; 
 serfs attached to the soil existed, it seems, up to this pe- 
 riod, in Languedoc. Philip the Fair is generally considered 
 the founder of the etats gcneraux, or states-general, an 
 assembly corresponding to the English parliament. He 
 called them together when preparing to resist pope Boni- 
 face, and caused each estate to answer the papal bull, 
 denying the pope's right of supremacy or interference. 
 He favoured the burgesses of towns, whom he found at 
 once wealthy and submissive, two qualities that his no- 
 bles wanted; and his frequent summonses established the 
 commons as a third estate. 
 
 Philip chose his ministers from the lower or middling 
 classes; selecting those versed in law, the new and chosen 
 science of the day. The management of the royal 
 revenues had hitherto appertained to the office of cham- 
 berlain. Philip appointed a superintendent of finance 
 in the person of Enguerrand de Marigny. The circum- 
 stance marks an important change. Of old, kings lived, 
 like other nobles, on the produce of their domains, 
 stewards and bailiffs were their most useful officers ; the 
 barons contributed to the support of the state by mili- 
 tary service : but now money had come to supersede 
 service of all kinds. Money was demanded, in lieu of 
 produce, for rent : money was demanded to carry on 
 war, rather than knights and men at arms. To raise 
 money thus continually, and for all purposes, was an
 
 90 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 13l6. 
 
 anomaly in the feudal system. It had made no pro- 
 vision for a yearly budget ; and hence the financial mea- 
 sures of the monarchs of the time consisted either in ex- 
 tortion, or in an appeal to the generosity of their subjects. 
 
 Philip the Fair left three sons, all of whom reigned in 
 succession. The eldest was Louis, surnamed Hutin from 
 his disorderly youth. His reign of two years is almost 
 unmarked by events. Charles count of Valois, brother 
 of Philip, held the chief influence over his nephew. He 
 employed it to destroy Enguerrand de Marigny, minister 
 of Philip the Fair, whom he accused of malversation 
 and sorcery, and whom he caused to be hanged upon the 
 common gibbet. Louis led an army against the Fle- 
 mings, but was obliged to disband it without a single 
 action or conquest. The three sons of Philip were un- 
 fortunate in their wives. It was discovered that all 
 three had been guilty of adultery. The three princesses 
 were imprisoned, and their paramours delivered to tor- 
 ture and death. The wife of Louis was strangled by 
 his order, to make way for another marriage. Louis 
 himself died in June, 1316, of a disease caught by 
 having descended to a cellar to drink wine when heated 
 by a game at ball. 
 
 Philip, the next brother, instantly took possession of the 
 palace. The lately married queen, however, now a widow, 
 announced herself with child, and Philip was obliged to 
 content himself with the title of regent. It was agreed 
 that he should govern for the infant about to be born, 
 should it prove a prince ; if birth was given to a princess, 
 Philip was to assume the crown. The queen brought 
 forth a son, which died soon after, and is known in the 
 list of French monarchs as John I. Louis Hutin had 
 left a daughter ; nevertheless her rights were passed 
 over. Philip made a compromise with his uncle, the 
 duke of Burgundy, and caused himself to be crowned 
 king. This is the first instance of the crown descend- 
 ing to the exclusion of females, by what is called the 
 salic law. This maxim was by no means previously 
 established, known, or understood. Chance, the mature
 
 PHILIP OF VALO1S. 91 
 
 age of Philip, the friendless state of the daughter of 
 Louis, together with the circumstance of her mother's 
 infidelity, were the true origin of a rule so unique and 
 important. The salic law was confirmed by a decree 
 of the states-general, which the new king summoned 
 for the purpose. The circumstances attending the suc- 
 cession of Philip the Long are the only important ones 
 of his reign. He died in January, 1322. 
 
 Philip left daughters, but no son. In obedience to 
 the salic law, that he had himself established, his daugh- 
 ters were set aside, and Charles IV., or the Fair, the 
 third son of Philip the Fair, succeeded to his brethren. 
 His reign of six years is equally a blank, marked only 
 by the expedition of queen Isabella of England and her 
 son against the unfortunate Edward II. Charles had 
 no offspring. Of the fine family left by Philip the Fair 
 there remained not a male descendant. The people con- 
 sidered this extinction of his race as a punishment 
 for the crimes of that monarch. Charles the Fair died 
 in the commencement of 1328, leaving his queen in a 
 state to produce an heir. " Should it be a son," ordered 
 the dying Charles, " let Philip count of Valois, my 
 cousin-german, be his tutor and the kingdom's regent. 
 If it be a daughter, let the twelve peers and barons of 
 France decide to whom the kingdom shall belong." 
 
 CHAP. IV. 
 
 1328 14,61. 
 
 FROM THE ACCESSION OF PHILIP OF VALOIS TO THAT OF 
 LOUIS XI. 
 
 THE thirteenth century was in Europe a period of com- 
 parative repose. Each nation was for the most part 
 occupied at home, reconciling discordant interests, strug- 
 gling to form some kind of system, and developing the 
 natural resources of commerce and industry. In France 
 the royal power obtained ascendancy over its rivals, re- 
 pressing the great feudatories, putting the yoke of its
 
 Q2 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1328. 
 
 legal authority over the necks of all, balancing the power 
 of the nobility in the mass, by calling the commons into 
 political existence, and securing the co-operation of the 
 clergy in resisting the encroaching power of Rome. This 
 rapid growth of despotism was favourable to order, to 
 wealth, to the external and material part of civilisa- 
 tion. But it was lamentably deficient in producing in- 
 tellectual improvement : whilst the turbulent freedom of 
 the cities of Italy not only allowed the increase of riches 
 and luxury, but awoke the dormant minds of its child- 
 ren, so as to give to the world such poets as Dante and 
 Petrarch, and a proof, perhaps, oi' still greater advance- 
 ment an historian of sense and judgment such as Vil- 
 lani, France remained undistinguished by genius or 
 learning. At the epoch to which we refer, the country 
 betrayed symptoms of deterioration in more than one 
 respect : public morals grew more corrupt, as is evident 
 from the wickedness universally imputed and believed; 
 crime generated crime, and vice reproduced itself, 
 prompted by no passion more lively than ignorance. A 
 stupid and pusillanimous dread of sorcery shed torrents 
 of human blood. The church burned thousands of 
 heretics for a logical blunder ; and became itself degene- 
 rate in purity, and power, and wisdom, from the mo- 
 ment of its alliance with persecution. The law rivalled 
 the church in absurd and capricious condemnations. Even 
 the spirit of chivalry ceased to actuate so base an age : it 
 expired with the crusades ; and was only reinstated by the 
 warriors of the next generation. 
 
 The period of history that we now enter upon is 
 marked by the rivalry that sprung up betwixt France 
 and England. Hitherto their quarrels had been those of 
 men speaking the same tongue, and actuated merely by 
 provincial interests ; but between Philip of Valois and 
 Edward III. the quarrel became national. In the breasts 
 of both countries it kindled the fire of patriotism and 
 emulation; and though it infused into the strife a spirit 
 of bitterness and inveteracy which usually characterises 
 party dissensions, yet many of the generous effects of
 
 1328. PHILIP vi. 93 
 
 chivalry were produced in the characters of those en- 
 gaged. It is customary to lament wars, and the blood 
 shed in them ; and yet peace, which comes fraught with 
 blessings and virtues to those nations that are far 
 advanced in civilisation, is sometimes pernicious to a 
 people but half emerged from barbarism. Stagnation is 
 then most to be dreaded : the virtues of a rude age are 
 all warlike, or at least war-born. France most certainly 
 degenerated in public spirit and national character, whilst 
 unvexed by her neighbour. 
 
 The following century of war, though it increased the 
 trophies of England, was not so wholly disastrous to 
 France as her historians represent. They see the great- 
 ness of one country but in the depression of another. 
 Often as the nation was humbled by defeat, her energies 
 were still called forth, her chivalrous spirit was kept 
 alive, her several provinces were knit together and united 
 by one common bond of feeling. Nothing so ennobles 
 a land as a valiant struggle for honour or independence ; 
 the blood that is then shed in the field, is neither idly 
 nor fruitlessly expended. 
 
 Philip of Valois, who succeeded to the French throne, 
 was the son of Charles count of Valois, who had been 
 brother to Philip the Fair. The last monarch had left 
 his queen enceinte; but a daughter having been born, 
 Philip, acting upon the salic law, assumed the crown 
 lately worn by his cousin. His chief competitor was 
 Edward III., son of Isabella daughter of Philip the 
 Fair. The English monarch's claim, though first sup- 
 ported by a strong protest, was not insisted on by Isa- 
 bella, who was too much occupied with enemies in 
 England to allow of her raising up others abroad : it 
 was nevertheless considered valid in France, even by 
 many of the doctors summoned by Philip to decide the 
 point.* The count d'Evreux, who had married the
 
 94 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1328. 
 
 daughter of Louis Hutin, entertained pretensions also. 
 The kingdom of Navarre was ceded to him in apanage. 
 Philip of Valois was crowned as king Philip VJ. at 
 Rheims, in May, 1328. He was a prince devoted to 
 magnificence and faste. His prodigality and love of 
 splendour formed such a brilliant court, that even kings 
 preferred sojourning at it to enjoying the independent 
 sovereignty of their own realms. The kings of Na- 
 varre and Bohemia took up their abode in Paris; the 
 dauphin, or prince of Dauphiny, though a feudatory of 
 the emperor, preferred following the king of France 
 both in peace and in war. This conduct of princes, 
 we may well suppose, was imitated by the aristocracy 
 in general, who soon came to exchange the solitary 
 pomp of feudal independence for the show and servility 
 of a court. 
 
 The romances of chivalry came at the same time 
 into vogue. The monarch and courtiers had need of a 
 manual of gentility, and precedents for their pompous 
 ceremonials and solemnities. They found them in these 
 volumes. 
 
 Here then begin the times of the second or resusci- 
 tated chivalry, which surpassed the old in magnificence 
 and refinement, if not in valour. One difference in 
 the spirit of chivalry in this and in the past century 
 is, that formerly it manifested a lordly contempt for 
 the ignobly born. The commons, however, had now 
 risen to wealth and importance, and the nobles were 
 gradually losing their hold of both : contempt, therefore, 
 was converted into hatred, and the chevalier regarded 
 the villein with the jealousy engendered by an unwar- 
 rantable encroachment on privileges presumed to be 
 hereditary and exclusive. This was much more the 
 case in France than in England. Nor did the hostility 
 which arose out of this mutual antipathy cease to waste 
 the former country, and to influence its character and its 
 destinies, till it at length exploded in the tremendous 
 phenomena of the Revolution. 
 - At Philip's coronation, Louis count of Flanders at-
 
 1340. WAR WITH FLANDERS. 95 
 
 tended as one of the great peers. He demanded the king's 
 aid against the Flemings, the citizens of Bruges and 
 Ypres, who insisted on their municipal privileges. Philip, 
 eager to lead an armry, grasped the opportunity : his 
 nobles, anxious to tread down the commonalty, seconded 
 him. He accordingly marched against the Flemings, 
 who, to the number of 1 6,000, attacked his camp in the 
 night near Cassel. After the first surprise the French 
 rallied, surrounded and slaughtered the enemy : 13,000 
 are said to have fallen in the field, and 10,000 on the 
 scaffold. The count was re-established by the victory. 
 Despite the just claim to the crown of France that 
 Edward III. considered himself to possess, he hesitated 
 for a long time to enforce it by arms. Philip, embold- 
 ened by his victory at Cassel, required Edward to come 
 and do homage for Guienne. The English monarch 
 obeyed ; nor did Edward, who was prudent as brave, 
 determine to wage war with the French king, and put 
 forth pretensions to his throne, till he was prompted 
 thereto by the advice and aid of Robert d'Artois. This 
 prince, a descendant of St. Louis, had claimed the county 
 of Artois. A female heir had, however, been preferred 
 to him ; and two judgments had so decided the question. 
 Robert, seeing the salic law prevail with respect to the 
 throne, thought it must equally apply to a great pro- 
 vince, and again agitated the matter. It was asserted 
 that he brought forged documents to support his right ; 
 that the fraud was discovered, and its author disgraced. 
 Such is the general account of historians, which Sis- 
 mondi, however, doubts. Accusation in those days was 
 seldom confined within limits of moderation or truth. 
 Of whatever crime a man w r as declared guilty, sorcery 
 was always added to fill up the measure. Robert was ac- 
 cused of making against Philip a voute, in other words 
 a waxen image, which he pricked, tortured, and burn- 
 ed ; supposing that the consumption of the model would 
 occasion the destruction of the original. This is the com- 
 mon crime or accusation of the age. Robert, who refused 
 to appear, was condemned and exiled. He sought refuge.
 
 96 HISTORY OP PRANCE. 1340. 
 
 first in Flanders, then in England, where he was well 
 received by Edward, and became his counsellor and in- 
 stigator against France. Causes of quarrel multiplied 
 betwixt the two countries. Philip favoured the Scotch : 
 Edward formed an alliance with the Flemish citizens, 
 whose count was attached to France; more especially with 
 Artaveldt, a brewer of hydromel or metheglin, one of 
 their leaders. The Flemings, who carried on a thriving 
 trade with England, preferred joining that country; but 
 scruples of allying with a foreign prince against their 
 feudal lord, the king of France, checked even the licen- 
 tious citizens. To obviate this difficulty, Artaveldt 
 advised Edward to assume the title of king of France, 
 which he claimed as a right. Edward was not backward 
 in adopting the brewer's suggestion ; an act by which 
 war was virtually declared.* Notwithstanding the mag- 
 nitude of the preparations, the first campaign was sig- 
 nalised by no action or enterprise. Both kings were 
 paralysed by the greatness of the stake ; and the armies, 
 which faced each other, separated without coming to 
 blows. Philip, who had purchased the aid of the Ge- 
 noese and collected a fleet, burnt and pillaged South- 
 ampton. Edward gathered a few ships, crowded them 
 with knights and archers, and sailed in pursuit. He 
 found the French fleet drawn close to the Dutch shore 
 near Sluys. He instantly bore down upon it, hooked 
 vessel to vessel, and by forming the decks into a platform 
 converted the engagement into one partaking of the cha- 
 racter of a land fight. After an obstinate struggle, the 
 French were defeated with immense loss, and their fleet 
 was destroyed. This was the only engagement of the 
 war. A truce immediately followed, which was subse- 
 quently prolonged. The enmity so often regarded as 
 natural to these two great nations does not yet appear to 
 have sprung up, and they now seemed to be far more 
 desirous for repose than swayed by mutual animosity or 
 ardour for martial enterprise. 
 
 Disturbances in Britany meanwhile implicated the 
 
 * 1337.
 
 1343. THE ENGLISH RELIEVE BRITANY. 97 
 
 monarchs in fresh quarrels. John duke of Britany died 
 in April, 1341, without children: his second brother 
 had left a daughter, married to Charles of Blois, Philip's 
 nephew : another brother, the count de Montfort, was 
 living and in the flower of his age. The uncle and 
 niece disputed the succession ; and the uncertain validity 
 or extent of the Salic law, which each party interpreted 
 in the manner favourable to themselves, produced another 
 domestic quarrel. The count de Montfort was first in 
 the field, and took possession of the chief towns of the 
 province. Charles of Blois remained in Paris to plead 
 his cause. De Montfort was summoned, and the court 
 of peers decided in favour of the king's nephew, Charles. 
 It was necessary to vindicate this right by arms. Philip 
 supported Charles of Blois ; De Montfort had recourse 
 to England, and did homage to Edward as king of France 
 for his duchy of Britany. The scene of war between 
 the nations was thus transferred to this province. The 
 commencement proved unfortunate to De Montfort ; he 
 was surprised in the town of Nantes by his rival, taken 
 prisoner, and conveyed to the Louvre. But the countess 
 de Montfort, who, in the words of Froissart, " had 
 the courage of a man and the heart of a lion," presented 
 her infant son to her followers, and promised that he 
 would prove a generous prince to them, and an avenger 
 of his sire. She shut herself up in Hennebon, and was 
 besieged by her enemies. She made a valiant defence ; 
 and, in a sortie which she headed in person, burnt the 
 camp of her enemies. The English fleet arrived to her 
 assistance under Walter de Manny, and compelled the 
 French to retire : Robert d'Artois soon after landed in 
 Britany and took the town of Vannes ; but it was re- 
 taken by De Clisson, and Robert received such severe 
 wounds that he did not long survive. A truce con- 
 cluded, in 1343, between Philip and Edward partly 
 caused hostilities to cease ; it was ill observed by the 
 Bretons of either party. 
 
 The internal administration of Philip in the mean time 
 resembled that of his predecessors, both in good and in 
 
 VOL. I. II
 
 C)8 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1345. 
 
 evil : he resisted the usurpations of the clergy, confirmed 
 the authority of parliament over inferior courts, and 
 consulted the true interests of the monarchy by the 
 purchase of Dauphiny. But he oppressed his subjects 
 by debasing the coin, and by every means of raising 
 money. It was he who established the gabclle, that 
 most odious regulation, which reserved to the king the 
 sole right of making and selling salt throughout the 
 realm, forcing each family to take a certain quantity at 
 an exorbitant price. This too he established by an 
 ordonnance, without having recourse to an assembly of 
 the states-general. The deference which Edward III. al- 
 ways manifested to his own subjects, as well as his respect 
 for their liberties, is contrasted with the contempt shown 
 by Philip for the body of the nation and its privileges. 
 During the present truce, the French king decoyed a 
 number of Breton knights to a tournament, seized upon 
 them, and executed them without even the form of a 
 trial, disdaining to assign reason or plea for his conduct. 
 It was presumed that they had entered into communi- 
 cation with England. 
 
 In 1345 the war again broke out. The earl of Derby 
 fought in Gascony against the count of Lille- Jourdain ; 
 the latter besieged Auberoche. The garrison sent a 
 page to summon the English to their aid ; the poor en- 
 voy was taken, placed in one of the besiegers' huge 
 engines, and literally shot back into the town. Derby, 
 however, came unawares on the French, defeated them, 
 and made prisoners of the greater part of the nobility 
 of Languedoc. The death of De Montfort relaxed the 
 fury of the war in Britany. Edward turned his arms 
 first to Flanders ; but his ally Artaveldt had lost his 
 influence over his fellow citizens, and being soon after 
 slain by them in a tumult, the English king left that 
 part of the country. The following year Edward mus- 
 tered his best forces ; resolving no more to harass the 
 frontiers of the enemy, but to penetrate boldly into his 
 land, and strike, if possible, a decisive blow. He landed 
 at La Hogue, took Caen, and was almost incited to
 
 1316. BATTLE or CUECY. 99 
 
 massacre the inhabitants on finding that an engagement 
 hail lately been entered into betwixt the Normans and 
 Philip to reconquer England. He allowed himself to 
 be dissuaded. Edward, from Caen, marched along the 
 left bank of the Seine to Paris ; he stopped at Poissy to 
 find means for passing the river, and burnt all the towns 
 in the vicinity of the capital, St. Germain and St. Cloud 
 amongst others. A body of German auxiliaries having 
 reinforced Philip, Edward thought it best to retreat 
 northwards through an unravaged country. The ex- 
 pedition was one of hazard. Philip was now pursued 
 by his enemies with a far superior army; numbers were 
 in advance to intercept the English king, more especially 
 to prevent his passage of the Somme. Edward, how- 
 ever, crossed a ford below Abbeville, notwithstanding 
 the resistance of one of Philip's lieutenants, and the 
 following day established his camp at Crecy, where he 
 resolved to await the enemy. 
 
 On the morning of the 26th of August, 1346, Ed- 
 ward drew up his army in three lines on a gentle slope, 
 with a wood behind, where he placed baggage and 
 horses. His cavaliers were to fight on foot; as, from the 
 smallness of the English numbers, " one eighth of the 
 French," says Froissart, but at most one third, it 
 was requisite they should keep together and fight on 
 the defensive. Edward, after riding through the ranks 
 and exhorting his soldiers, cheerfully commanded them 
 to sit down, to take ample refreshment, and in repose 
 await the enemy. Philip in the mean time was leading 
 forth his numerous host from Abbeville : it was an army 
 lately gathered, obeying many chiefs, some Genoese, 
 some Germans; undisciplined, weak, and disorderly, from 
 its very numbers. From Abbeville to Crecy was a march 
 of three or four leagues. The hour was late, and the 
 French were tired ere they approached the English line. 
 Philip was advised to halt and await the following day : 
 he gave orders for so doing ; but such was the rivalry of 
 the chiefs, that each would have his banner next the 
 enemy, and in the disorder they approached too near 
 H 2
 
 100 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1346. 
 
 the English to retreat or defer the action. The choleric 
 Philip, too, when he saw the English array, and its" 
 small extent, became anxious to annihilate his enemies. 
 He ordered the Genoese cross-bowmen to begin the 
 action ; they were reluctant, and pleaded fatigue. " Kill 
 the lazy ribalds ! " said the count d'Ale^on ; and the 
 Genoese were compelled to attack : they did so with a 
 loud clamour, which was increased by a storm of rain 
 and thunder, and by an immense flock of crows which 
 hovered over the armies, and was regarded as an evil 
 presage. The English archers advanced each one step in 
 silence, and by one volley slaughtered and discomfited 
 the Genoese. The French knights, enraged, drew their 
 swords on the unfortunate auxiliaries, and cut their way 
 through to arrive at the enemy. They encountered the 
 first line of the English under the prince of Wales ; and 
 here was the heat of the battle. Edward was sent to 
 for aid ; but he, who saw the strife and knew the mettle 
 of his men, refused. " Let my son win his- spurs ! " said 
 the monarch ; and bravely did young Edward, afterwards 
 the Black Prince, earn these symbols of knighthood. 
 The French were beaten, despite their immense numbers; 
 and as darkness soon came on to increase the confusion 
 and render it impossible to recognise knight or noble, 
 the slaughter was great. Eleven princes fell in the 
 field ; also nearly an hundred nobles bearing banners, 
 twelve hundred chevaliers, and thirty thousand soldiers. 
 Amongst them were the kings of Bohemia and Majorca, 
 the dukes of Lorraine and Bourbon, the counts of Flan- 
 ders and Alen9on. Godfrey of Harcourt, who was in 
 Edward's army, saw his brother the count of Harcourt 
 and his two sons perish in the opposite ranks. Philip 
 was compelled to take flight. Such was the battle of 
 Crecy, remarkable for the noble blood shed in it, and 
 for the brief space in which it was decided. Though 
 the defeat was owing in a great measure to the want of 
 discipline and ill assortment of Philip's army, the chief 
 cause in this, as in other instances, was the contempt 
 of the French princes and nobles for the peasant levies
 
 1350. SIEGE OF CALAIS. 101 
 
 and infantry, to which they evidently preferred the 
 rabble of foreign mercenaries. The day after the action 
 large bodies of the militia of neighbouring municipalities 
 arrived, and were slaughtered by the English. Edward, 
 on the contrary, relied upon his country's yeomen, and 
 compelled his knights to dismount and fight on foot 
 with them. 
 
 After his victory Edward laid siege to Calais. The 
 tide of fortune was turned every where against the 
 French by the tidings of Crecy. John, the son of Philip, 
 besieged Walter de Manny in the town of Aiguillon ; 
 he was now obliged to raise the siege. De Manny 
 asked John for permission and safe conduct to traverse 
 France in order to reach his master's army : John 
 granted the safe conduct; but his father Philip broke it, 
 and arrested De Manny in his passage through Orleans. 
 John, an honourable prince, was shocked at his father's 
 want of faith, and vowed no longer to bear arms unless 
 De Manny was released ; and Philip, despite his choler 
 and feelings of petty vengeance, was obliged to liberate 
 him. Charles of Blois was about the same time taken 
 prisoner in Britany. The circumstances attending the 
 siege of Calais, its distress, the devotedness of its six 
 burgesses, and its final surrender, are known to every 
 English reader.* Edward seemed contented with this fruit 
 of his victory, for a truce of ten months was soon after 
 agreed on between the monarchs. The remaining years 
 of the French king's reign are marked chiefly by the 
 plague which devastated Europe, and which compelled 
 a prolongation of the truce. Philip of Valois died in 
 August, 1350. 
 
 John was upwards of thirty when he succeeded his 
 father Philip. The new king was feebler in character 
 than his predecessor, less choleric and astute. He 
 was at the same time more valiant, more amiable, more 
 the preux chevalier, for already romance reading had 
 created a peculiar morality and ideal perfection at 
 which gentle and noble aimed. The same neglect of 
 
 See Cab. Cyc. Hist. Eng. vol. i. p. SCO. 
 H 3
 
 102 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1355. 
 
 justice reigned, however, and was observable even in 
 John, whose first steps were to adulterate the coin, and, 
 in imitation of his father, to decapitate, without trial, a 
 nobleman, the count de Guines. The states-general were 
 called together, and they voted a pernicious mode of levy- 
 ing money on every sale that took place. In their assembly 
 of the year 1355, when the necessities of the monarch 
 had increased, the states established receivers-general, 
 who should give them an account of the levy. They 
 ordered, moreover, that nobles and prelates should pay 
 it as well as the commons, and that they should re- 
 assemble at the end of a year to vote new taxes. This 
 was a bold attempt to acquire the same privileges which 
 were possessed by the English commons. 
 
 The court was in the mean time agitated by the 
 turbulence of Charles the Bad, king of Navarre. In 
 imitation of the sovereign's custom of putting his ene- 
 mies to death without trial or accusation, Charles assas- 
 sinated his rival, Louis of Spain, a favourite with John, 
 and constable of the realm. He was powerful enough to 
 obtain pardon ; nevertheless his intrigues continued. The 
 kingdom was in a state of the greatest discontent against 
 the new taxes, especially against the gabelle. The king 
 of Navarre, the count of Harcourt, and others, fomented 
 these disturbances. Charles, eldest son of John, called 
 the dauphin, as lord of Dauphiny, which Philip of Valois 
 had purchased for him, was at that time governor of 
 Normandy. He entertained the king of Navarre and 
 the lord of Harcourt at dinner. John arriving in the 
 midst of the feast, armed and well attended, ordered 
 none to stir on pain of death. He seized the king of 
 Navarre " by the skin," dragging him towards him, and 
 exclaimed " Out, traitor ! thou art not worthy to dine 
 at my son's table. By my father's soul ! I have a mind 
 never to eat or drink while thou livest." John then 
 ordered the king of Navarre and his followers to be led 
 out and imprisoned, despite the supplications of the 
 dauphin, who said he should be dishonoured if people 
 suspected him of such treachery. King John then
 
 1356. FIELD OF POITIERS. 103 
 
 seized a mace, struck count Harcourt with it between 
 the shoulders, and told him to " get to prison in the 
 devil's name;" whereupon calling the " king of the 
 ribalds," as the captain of the royal guards was then 
 characteristically denominated, John gave him orders. 
 Those orders were to behead Harcourt and his followers : 
 they were executed in the king's presence, after he 
 finished the dinner at which his son's unfortunate guests 
 had been sitting. The family of Harcourt, that of the 
 king of Navarre, and many Cobles, renounced their alle- 
 giance on learning this act of violence. The people 
 were equally enraged against John ; but their murmurs 
 and commotions were hushed by the tidings, that the 
 Black Prince had ravaged Auvergne and the Limousin, 
 and had entered into the central province of Berri. John 
 had a respectable army on foot against the partisans of 
 the king of Navarre. He summoned his barons and 
 knights to reinforce it. All crowded under the banners 
 of the new monarch to avenge the defeat of Crecy. 
 Prince Edward had left Bordeaux with no more than 
 2000 men at arms, and 6000 archers and infantry. 
 With this small force he thought it prudent to retreat ; 
 but John had already intercepted him, and the En- 
 glish, instead of having left their enemies behind, found 
 them in advance of the town of Poitiers, blocking their 
 retreat. 
 
 The French army, composed of the flower of the na- 
 tion, mustered 60,000 strong. The prince of Wales, to 
 compensate for his inferiority of numbers, took post on 
 a rising ground, which was surrounded with vineyards 
 and enclosures, and was only approachable through 
 narrow roads flanked with hedgerows. Talleyrand 
 cardinal of Perigord endeavoured to bring about an 
 accommodation. The Black Prince was not reluctant 
 to escape from an enemy ten times exceeding his own 
 force. He offered to restore all his conquests, and bind 
 himself not to serve against France for seven years. 
 John insisted that Edward should surrender himself his 
 prisoner; and the proposal was rejected by the prince 
 H 4
 
 104- HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1356. 
 
 as disgraceful. He gained a day's delay by these ne- 
 gotiations, which he failed not to employ in casting 
 up entrenchments and fortifying the sides of his po- 
 sition. 
 
 On the 19th of September, a corps of French knights 
 was ordered to clear the road leading to Edward's 
 camp. They were commanded by D'Andrehen and 
 De Clermont, the two marshals of France. They 
 spurred on, not more than four being able to go abreast. 
 The English archers, who lined the inside of the hedge, 
 soon stopped the career of the cavalry by their arrows; 
 and the footmen, creeping through, stabbed knights and 
 horses with their knives in the confusion. The troop 
 was routed, and fell back upon the dauphin's corps ; a 
 body of English cavalry and archers, which Edward had 
 placed in ambuscade, then charged upon the French 
 flank : those commanded by the dauphin were seized 
 with a panic and fled- The English knights, who were 
 hitherto on foot to receive the enemy, now mounted 
 their horses, and abandoning their position, charged 
 down the narrow road upon the enemy, whom they put 
 to the rout and drove before them ; the young princes 
 and many of the French nobles taking flight. The 
 reserve or hindmost line, however, commanded by king 
 John in person, still remained unbroken. Its numbers 
 doubled those of the English army. John, imitating 
 his enemy's mode of fighting, and desirous to cut off 
 from himself and followers all possibility of flight, gave 
 orders to dismount and combat on foot. The fresh di- 
 vision of the French charged the English under their 
 marshals lords Suffolk and Warwick, the French mo- 
 narch striking down enemies with his mace, while his 
 youngest son Philip, afterwards duke of Burgundy, 
 piously kept eye and arm busied to defend his sire. 
 Here the battle raged with the greatest fury and 
 slaughter, the English striving to make the king of 
 France prisoner. At length, when most of his nobles 
 were either slain around him or taken, John called out, 
 " Where is my cousin the prince of Wales ?" Edward
 
 1356. BATTLE OF POITIERS. 105 
 
 was not near, and the king was obliged to give his right 
 glove, in token of surrender, to Morbec, a knight of 
 Arras. Others crowded to claim and dispute so rich a 
 prize, not without danger to the person of the monarch, 
 until lords Warwick and Cobham arrived to defend him. 
 The battle of Poitiers, according to Froissart, was better 
 fought than that of Crecy, though not so bloody. The 
 duke of Bourbon was the only prince slain, though 
 many nobles perished. The number of prisoners was 
 immense, more than doubling that of the English army ; 
 amongst them, thirteen counts, and seventy barons, 
 besides the king and his son. The conflict lasted from 
 morn till noon. That of Crecy began at the time of 
 vespers. The Black Prince earned more honour by his 
 treatment of the captive king than even by his victory. 
 John was treated in every way as a sovereign : he was 
 c'heered, praised, and even waited on at table, by Edward. 
 The entry of the royal captive into London was marked 
 by the same deference. Nor was this mere empty po- 
 liteness. The king of England and his son did not take 
 the utmost advantage of their victory. The right to 
 the crown of France, which they denied to John at the 
 head of his armies, they no longer disputed with John, 
 a captive. A truce was concluded for two years. The 
 English were content with their booty, their rich prize, 
 and their ample renown. 
 
 Charles, the dauphin, who had escaped from the 
 field of Poitiers, now took upon him the government 
 of the kingdom. His first act was to summon the 
 states-general, which met in two assemblies ; those of the 
 south at Toulouse, those of the north at Paris. The 
 southern states voted levies of men and money : the 
 northern proved more refractory, and demanded, as the 
 price of a subsidy, that the ministers should be tried ; 
 that a committee of their own body should be permanent, 
 to aid the dauphin with its counsel ; and, finally, that 
 the king of Navarre should be released. The king of 
 Navarre was the first noble who sought in popularity a 
 counterpoise against the royal authority. The popular
 
 106 HISTORY OF PRANCE. 1357- 
 
 party was headed by Stephen Marcel, provost or chief 
 of the municipality of Paris. The king evaded these 
 demands, and tried the old experiment of issuing new 
 and debased money. An insurrection was the conse- 
 quence : Marcel made his way to the presence of the 
 dauphin; and, by his order, the marshals Clermont and 
 Conflans were massacred in Charles's presence. Marcel 
 made the young prince put on the chaperon or cap, 
 which was the symbol of insurrection, a circumstance 
 repeated in after times of similar turbulence and misfor- 
 tune. It is remarkable how far advanced the Parisians 
 were at this time in their aims at freedom, and in what 
 has been called revolutionary tactics. The other towns 
 and provinces did not, however, approve of the bold 
 notions of the Parisians. Champagne, especially, de- 
 clared against them, and the dauphin was enabled to 
 collect an assembly of states at Compiegne, which con- 
 demned the acts of those of Paris. The provost Marcel 
 released the king of Navarre from prison, in order to 
 procure an eminent leader for the party. Despite of 
 this, the dauphin's influence prevailed ; Marcel was slain 
 in a tumult, and the king of Navarre driven from the 
 capital. 
 
 Mutual hatred betwixt the nobles and peasants was at 
 this time general in France. The latter enjoyed their 
 feudal privileges and superiority as guerdon for defend- 
 ing the country in arms. The defeats of Poitiers and 
 Crecy showed them unequal to this task ; and the 
 French peasantry, who were not considered by their 
 lords as worthy to wield a sword, looked on the dis- 
 comfited knights and barons with contempt. This spirit 
 of discontent was increased by theweight of the taxes ; not 
 only the public taxes of the gabelle, and the duty on sales, 
 but the private taille, which possessors of fiefs levied on 
 their tenants, and which were now exorbitant on account 
 of the ransoms requisite for so many captives : then the 
 disbanded soldiers of both armies increased the disorder 
 by robbery and pillage. The reclamation of the states- 
 general, the effervescence of the population inhabiting
 
 1358. THE JAQUERIE. 107 
 
 the towns, set the example of licence ; and every where 
 throughout the kingdom the peasants were vowing 
 vengeance on all nobly born, storming castles, massa- 
 cring gentlemen and their families, and putting many 
 to the torture. This popular insurrection was called 
 the Jaquerie, from the name of Jaques Bonhomme, or 
 Jaques, given in derision to the French peasant. The 
 hatred and contempt of both classes was mutual ; Frois- 
 sart tells triumphantly, " how the gentlemen of Beau- 
 vaisy killed great plenty of Jaques." Three hundred 
 ladies of rank, with the duchess of Orleans, were 
 obliged to take refuge in Meaux from the exasperated 
 peasantry. Captal de Buch, a Gascon knight in Ed- 
 ward's service, flew to their rescue, slaughtered seven 
 thousand of the assailants, and, to crown his revenge, 
 burnt the town of Meaux " with all the villeins he 
 could shut up in it." 
 
 After two years captivity, king John sought to release 
 himself by treaty. He agreed to cede to Edward the 
 entire west of France in sovereignty, together with four 
 thousand crowns ransom. The dauphin wisely rejected 
 conditions so injurious to the monarchy, and Edward 
 prepared for fresh hostilities. He landed at Calais in 
 October, 1358, resolved to ravage those parts of France 
 that had not yet seen his banners. He entered Cham- 
 pagne ; sat down before Rheims, as if with the wish of 
 having himself crowned king of France in its cathedral ; 
 but, abandoning the tecliousness of a siege, he penetrated 
 into Burgundy, which, like many towns, purchased an 
 alliance with him, and exemption from ravages. Edward 
 then directed his march towards the capital, encamped 
 before it, and defied the dauphin to battle. That cau- 
 tious prince replied by burning the suburbs and keeping 
 himself within the walls ; and in a little time Edward 
 was obliged to retire towards the Loire in search of 
 provisions. 
 
 The English king had now traversed the whole cir- 
 cuit of France as a conqueror. He had full opportunities 
 for observing that he could never establish his authority
 
 108 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1360. 
 
 elsewhere than in those provinces which he might claim 
 by hereditary right. He w r as in years, and was naturally 
 anxious to establish a permanent peace. Perhaps, too, 
 he was somewhat stricken by remorse at so much devas- 
 tation and bloodshed. Edward announced, that during 
 a thunder-storm he had made a vow to restore peace to 
 the world. Commissioners met on both sides, and a 
 treaty was concluded at Bretigny between France and 
 England, in May, 1360: Edward gave up his pretensions 
 to the crown of France, as well as to Normandy. All 
 Aquitaine and the provinces south-west of the Loire 
 were ceded in full sovereignty to England, as was the 
 country on the sea-coast from Calais to the Somme. 
 Three millions of crowns were to be given as the ransom 
 of king John, who was within a short time liberated. He 
 reigned three years after the recovery of his freedom ; a 
 period marked chiefly by the decline of the family of the 
 old dukes of Burgundy, which became extinct. They 
 were descended from Robert, son of Hugh Capet. The 
 crown took possession of that rich duchy; but John, 
 overlooking the true interests of the monarchy, or igno- 
 rant of them, gave Burgundy in apanage to his fourth 
 son Philip, who had been taken prisoner with him at 
 Crecy. Though the peace concluded at Bretigny was 
 not broken, still many of its stipulations remained un- 
 fulfilled. The most flagrant instance of bad faith was 
 the escape from England of one of the hostages, the 
 duke of Anjou : either from this cause, or from a wish 
 to negotiate with Edward, John returned to London, 
 and died at the Savoy palace in the Strand, in April, 
 1364-. 
 
 King John's was an inconsistent character; valiant 
 though weak, generous and honourable in many instances, 
 but cruel, and even perfidious in his treatment of count 
 d'Harcourt. His reign is remarkable as being the 
 period in which the states-general professed the boldest 
 maxims of freedom, and made the most vigorous efforts 
 to establish them. They decreed their recognition of 
 the great principle, that no subject should be compelled
 
 1364. ACCESSION OF CHARLES V. 10[) 
 
 to pay a tax to which he had not legally assented. This, 
 to which England held as to an anchor through every 
 political storm, was soon torn from the grasp of the 
 French, or abandoned by them. The years 1355 and 
 1356 may be considered the only period during which 
 the French monarchy marched in the path of constitu- 
 tional freedom. They were the moments of a brief and 
 ill-contested struggle, in which royalty prevailed. This 
 advantage it never afterwards lost or conceded. From 
 the days of Marcel to the Revolution, all attempts to 
 wrest from despotism its iron sceptre proved vain. The 
 most pernicious and unjust prerogatives were in course 
 of time held to be sacred ; and henceforth the internal 
 peace and happiness of the nation came to consist in the 
 forbearance of the master and the submission of the 
 slave. 
 
 It was fortunate for the independence, though not for 
 the liberties of the country, that a prudent and crafty 
 monarch succeeded to the throne of John. His son, 
 Charles V., is known by the name of the Sage : he had 
 already reigned as dauphin, and had learned wisdom 
 from adversity and experience. His first act was to 
 attack that intriguing grandee, Charles king of Navarre, 
 who had troubled John's reign by avowing himself the 
 supporter of popular rights. The continuance of the war 
 had called forth warlike talents. Du Guesclin, a knight 
 of Britany, had signalised himself in the troubles of 
 the province. Charles, with his characteristic prudence, 
 selected him as general, and sent him to dispossess the 
 king of Navarre of the towns which he held in Nor- 
 mandy. John de Grailli, called the captal (lord) de 
 Buch, a famed captain of Gascony, was opposed to him 
 by Charles of Navarre. In a combat where great mili- 
 tary skill as well as courage was displayed on both sides, 
 the captal was defeated and taken by Du Guesclin. The 
 war was then transferred to Britany. Du Guesclin and 
 Charles of Blois marched against the troops of De Mont- 
 fort most of them English, and commanded by Robert 
 Knolles. Against these enemies Du Guescliu was not
 
 110 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1365. 
 
 so successful: he was taken prisoner, and Charles of 
 Blois slain. The victory of Auray gave complete peace 
 to France. John de Montfort was recognised duke of 
 Britany by Charles, who at the same time made peace 
 with the king of Navarre. 
 
 The worst consequences of war continued to afflict 
 and weigh upon France, notwithstanding the conclusion 
 of these treaties. The bands of mercenary soldiers, or 
 great companies, which lent their support on hire to the 
 respective monarchs, were now left without pay or ser- 
 vice to prey upon the land. Charles employed Du 
 Guesclin to treat with these bands, and bribe them to 
 accompany him across the Pyrenees to support Henry of 
 Castile against his brother Peter the Cruel. They were 
 tempted by the plunder of Avignon, which lay in their 
 route. The pope endeavoured to avert their march by 
 absolutions, which he lavished on this army of scoun- 
 drels. They accepted the religious immunity, but were 
 not less severe in their exactions. Du Guesclin, at the 
 head of these bands, drove Peter the Cruel from Castile. 
 But the Black Prince and his warriors, impatient of re- 
 pose, espoused the part of Peter, and attacking Du 
 Guesclin, vanquished and took him prisoner. All these 
 events turned to the advantage of France. The prince 
 of Wales, lavish of his resources as of his valour, was 
 distressed by the expenses of his expedition. He sought 
 to levy, in consequence, an additional tax on every hearth 
 throughout the province of Aquitaine. His subjects 
 resisted. The malcontents appealed to Charles V., who, 
 seeing the infirm state of health both of prince Edward 
 and his father, listened to the complaints of the barons 
 of Aquitaine. He summoned the Black Prince to Paris 
 to answer them. The reply was, a resolve to obey the 
 summons at " the head of sixty thousand men." The 
 threat was vain. War w r as declared. The prince 
 caused himself to be carried in a litter at the head of 
 his army, and in this state took Limoges. But Ills 
 malady gained upon him, and he was obliged to return 
 and embark for England, where he soon after expired.
 
 1376. PROVINCES REGAINED FROM THE ENGLISH. Ill 
 
 Edward III. was not long in following his heroic son to 
 the grave ; and the sceptres of England and Aquitaine 
 were left in the feeble hands of a minor. 
 
 Charles the Sage was not a monarch to let pass such 
 advantage. Du Guesclin was made constable, and com- 
 manded against the English. Still he had strict orders 
 to avoid giving battle. Instead of confining their efforts 
 to a defence of their provinces, the English marched 
 from Calais across the whole extent of France to Bor- 
 deaux, ravaging the country, and exciting the hatred of 
 the population, without gaining their object of exciting 
 the prudent Charles to a general engagement. The 
 strength of the English armies was thus wasted in 
 marching and bravado. Du Guesclin watched every 
 opportunity of gaining a partial advantage. The pre- 
 sumption of the English garrison of Chizey, which at- 
 tacked very superior forces under the command of the 
 constable, afforded a triumph to the latter. The capital 
 of Poitiers revolted and opened its gates to the French. 
 Rochelle followed its example ; and this province, the 
 prize of the victories of the Black Prince, was again lost 
 to the English. 
 
 It is evident that the kings of England were struggling 
 against the course of nature and of events, in endeavour- 
 ing to hold possessions in France : whatever was ac- 
 quired by the greatest efforts of the statesman, and the 
 most brilliant victories of the hero, was lost again with- 
 out a single action of any importance. The Angli- 
 cised provinces again became French, as waters return 
 to their level. It required but a word, a decree on the 
 part of the king of France, and all that he had alienated, 
 again became his. Thus, whilst the victorious cam- 
 paigns of the English fill the most brilliant pages of 
 history, those in which France recovers her provinces 
 are merely a succession of petty skirmishes and treasons, 
 in which there is little glory and less interest. The 
 wars of the reign of Charles V. are of the latter kind ; 
 so that it is sufficient to indicate their result. Du 
 Guesclin alone appears amongst the French to claim the
 
 112 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1 380. 
 
 honour of a hero. He is the first warrior of modern 
 France the earliest name in the bright annals of her 
 military fame. He was strong, and of a clumsy and even 
 awkward make. When this redoubted warrior was a 
 prisoner at Bordeaux, after his defeat in Castile, the 
 Black Prince heard it whispered that he retained Du 
 Guesclin because he feared him. Edward bade him 
 name his own ransom, and go to seek it. It was fixed 
 at 100,000 crowns. The princess of Wales paid a 
 considerable portion of it as did John Chandos, the 
 English champion next in repute for valour to prince 
 Edward. Du Guesclin survived his brave enemies 
 but a few years. He died in 1380, at the siege of 
 Randan. 
 
 One of the last achievements of Du Guesclin was to 
 drive the newly-acknowledged duke, De Montfort, from 
 Britany. He took refuge in England; but Charles 
 having shown an inclination to destroy the independence 
 of the province by uniting it to the crown, the pride of 
 the Breton nobles was alarmed. Du Guesclin himself 
 felt, for the first and only time, his feelings of loyalty 
 abate. The duke was summoned back from England 
 by the people of the duchy, and welcomed with more 
 enthusiasm and attachment than he had ever yet excited. 
 It was to support the duke of Britany that the duke of 
 Gloucester led an army into France in the year 1380. 
 Following the usual tactics of the day, he traversed the 
 country, daring the French to action. They were said 
 to be preparing to accept the challenge when tidings of 
 the dangerous illness of the king came, to turn the zeal 
 and anxiety of princes and nobles from patriotic to 
 selfish views. Charles, when dauphin, was said to have 
 been poisoned by the king of Navarre. An antidote 
 taken opportunely had saved his life, but left him still 
 weakly. His hair and nails had dropped off at the time. 
 The remembrance of this peril and the potency of the 
 poison were said to be the cause of the timidity of his 
 character, as well as of his early death. It took place in 
 September, 1380, at the castle of Beaute, on the Marne.
 
 1380. RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE DESTROYED. 113 
 
 It was not undeservedly that Charles V. obtained the 
 title of Sage. He succeeded to power in one of the 
 most critical periods of the monarchy, when, humbled 
 by the English, it was at the same time threatened by 
 the people, who had risen to know their rights and to 
 demand them. To have conceded those rights was not 
 to be expected from a monarch of that day, scarcely 
 to be hoped, indeed ; for liberty, so valuable as a con- 
 quest, is precarious as a boon. The predecessors of 
 Charles had raised up the commons to be a counterpoise 
 to the aristocracy, and had favoured the passage of 
 wealth and importance into plebeian hands. When, 
 however, to ensure this wealth, the commons sought for 
 political privileges and influence, the monarch turned to 
 crush them. They had established their rights in the 
 reign of John ; but Charles succeeded in putting them 
 down, and effectually destroying them. 
 
 In England the aristocracy had always taken the lead 
 in asserting and defending the liberties, not only of their 
 own order, but of the country generally. There was a 
 strong community of feeling between the English nobles 
 and the great body of the people, who were raised above 
 the corresponding class in France by their ancient Saxon 
 laws and free institutions, by a larger exemption from the 
 evils of war, and by the greater compactness and unity 
 of the country, which favoured the equal distribution of 
 justice. In France, on the contrary, the peasant was a 
 despised, oppressed creature. The walls of a town alone 
 defended the plebeian ; and to the town every peasant 
 hied that had the least property to enjoy or to preserve. 
 Hence the face of the country was deserted by all, 
 save the destitute. Those substantial husbandmen, who 
 formed the class of yeomen in England, disappeared in 
 France, or were converted into burgesses. In the latter 
 country, accordingly, the spirit of liberty was confined to 
 the municipalities, each of which, from the extent and 
 poverty of the land, was isolated, having no communica- 
 tion or sympathy with those around it. The partisans 
 of freedom, collected into partial knots and masses, were
 
 114 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1380. 
 
 thus either easily overawed and crushed, or, finding 
 themselves superior in force, asserted their independence 
 and privileges with all the licence of a town rabble. 
 They stopped not short of riot and bloodshed, rendered 
 the name of freedom synonymous with disorder, and 
 rallied to the side of royalty all the lovers of security 
 and peace. 
 
 Such is the history of events in France. The states- 
 general wrested from John an acknowledgment of their 
 political rights. When the monarch or his son sought 
 to withdraw these concessions, it was the population of 
 the capital that rose against their bad faith. The nobility 
 kept aloof; the peasantry were ignorant of what was going 
 forward. The Parisians under Marcel, finding them- 
 selves in possession of power, made a turbulent and licen- 
 tious use of it, massacred those whom they suspected, 
 and stained their cause with violence and bloodshed. 
 
 Charles took advantage of this : he made an appeal 
 to order ; and, calling a patched-up assembly of states at 
 Compiegne, he succeeded in crushing the Parisians. 
 During his reign the cry of liberty was stifled. Charles 
 the Sage seldom called the states together, or, when he 
 did, it was upon a few chosen deputies that he bestowed 
 the name. He usurped to himself the power of levying 
 taxes by proceeding in state to the parliament, there 
 holding what was called a bed of justice, and ordering 
 his laws or levies to be registered. 
 
 Such was the new mode of legislation invented by 
 Charles, and which endured until the Revolution. The 
 ancient mode of promulgating a law was to register it in 
 the books of parliament, which was the high court of 
 justice of the kingdom. Charles assumed this form of 
 promulgation to have the entire force of legislation ; and 
 thus by a trick converted a government, that hitherto 
 at least contained the germs of freedom, into an absolute 
 monarchy. 
 
 Charles the Sage left two sons : Charles VI., who 
 now succeeded him, and had not attained twelve years 
 of age; and Louis, afterwards duke of Orleans. The
 
 1380. REGENCY. 115 
 
 infant king had four uncles to dispute his tutelage, and 
 the direction of affairs : these were the dukes of Anjou, 
 Berry, and Burgundy, brothers of the late monarch, 
 and the duke of Bourbon, his brother-in-law. Charles 
 the Sage, foreseeing the ambition of his relatives, had 
 ordained that the kings of France should attain their 
 majority at the age of fourteen. He had regulated that 
 the duke of Anjou should be regent, whilst the dukes 
 of Burgundy and Bourbon should have the care of the 
 young king. 
 
 The duke of Anjou commenced by pillaging the 
 royal treasure, A great proportion of the late monarch's 
 savings was concealed in the chateau of Melun. The 
 duke summoned the treasurer, and under menace of the 
 torture compelled him to point out the part of the wall 
 in which the ingots were built, and which he immedi- 
 ately tore down. At the ceremony of the coronation the 
 duke of Anjou claimed to be at the right hand of the 
 king, as eldest prince of the blood ; the duke of Bur- 
 gundy, as first peer of the realm, seized the place, and 
 kept it. Upon their return to Paris the quarrel con- 
 tinued, but the people paid for it. The treasury was 
 left empty, and the soldiers were compelled to prey on 
 the country for support. The peasants as well as the mu- 
 nicipality of Paris rose; but there seems to have been no 
 understanding between bodies so distinct as the citizens 
 and the peasantry. The dukes were obliged to repeal the 
 new taxes ; but the government could not proceed with- 
 out them. Fresh ones were proclaimed. The mob 
 attacked the receivers, broke into the arsenal, seized t 
 quantity of leaden mallets the only weapons at hand, 
 -and forced all the palaces and prisons. Rouen imi- 
 tated the example of Paris, but was severely punished 
 by the duke of Anjou. The young king and his uncle 
 made a kind of compromise with the Parisians, and were 
 permitted to enter the capital. The duke of Anjou saw 
 that spoliation became more difficult in France. His 
 cousin Jeanne, queen of Naples, had bequeathed to him 
 by testament all the rights of the first house of Anjou 
 i 2
 
 116 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1382. 
 
 the kingdom of Naples, and the county of Provence. 
 The sovereignty was, nevertheless, claimed by Charles 
 of Durazzo. The duke of Anjou departed from France 
 with all his wealth and a brilliant army, to conquer 
 his new heritage. He marched through Italy, invaded 
 Naples, his rival retiring before him. But being seized 
 with a malady, brought on by his fatigues, he died ; and 
 his army, dispersing itself, made the best of its way 
 home in scattered bands. 
 
 Philip duke of Burgundy, though the youngest son 
 of king John, was by far the most powerful of the bro- 
 thers. In addition to the duchy and county of Bur- 
 gundy, (the latter is known as Franche-Comte,) he 
 had married the daughter and heiress of the last count 
 of Flanders, and was thus heir to that wealthy province. 
 The Flemish burgesses were foremost in supporting their 
 privileges and independence : they were always at war 
 with their count, who, from his alliance with Burgundy, 
 naturally sought the aid of the king of France. The 
 young Charles was delighted at the idea of a campaign ; 
 an army was levied ; the oriflamme, or royal standard, 
 hoisted ; and the French, under their monarch of four- 
 teen, advanced northwards. The object of the expe- 
 dition was not only to restore to the count of Flanders 
 his authority, but to punish the turbulent commons, 
 who stirred up those of France to imitate their example. 
 Froissart avows it to have been a war between the com- 
 mons and the aristocracy. The Flemings were com- 
 manded by Artaveldt, son of the famous brewer the ally 
 of Edward. The town of Ghent had been reduced to 
 the extreme of distress and famine by the count and the 
 people of Bruges, who supported him. Artaveldt led the 
 people of Ghent in a forlorn hope against Bruges, de- 
 feated the army of the count, and broke into the rival 
 town, which he took and plundered. 
 
 After this disaster, the count had recourse to France. 
 The passage of the river Lys, which defended Flanders, 
 was courageously undertaken, and effected with some 
 hazard by the French. The Flemings were rather dis-
 
 1382. VICTORY OF HOSEBECQUE. 117 
 
 piritcd by this first success : nevertheless they assem- 
 bled their forces; and the two armies of French knights 
 and Flemish citizens met at Rosebecque, between Y pres 
 and Courtray. The 2~th of November, 1382, was the 
 day of battle. Arta veldt had stationed his army on a 
 height, to await the attack of the French, but their im- 
 patience forced him to commence. Forming his troops 
 into one solid square, Artaveldt led them against the 
 French centre. Froissart compares their charge to the 
 headlong rush of a wild boar. It broke the opposite 
 line, penetrating into its ranks : but the wings of the 
 French turned upon the flank of the Flemings, which, 
 not having the advantage of a charge or impulse, were 
 beaten by the French men at arms. Pressed upon one 
 another, the Flemings had not room to fight : they were 
 hemmed in, surrounded, and slaughtered : no quarter 
 was asked or given ; nearly 30,000 perished. The 
 9000 Ghentois that had marched under their banner 
 were counted, to a man, amongst the slain : Artaveldt, 
 their general, was among the foremost who had fallen. 
 Charles ordered his body to be hung upon a tree. 
 
 It was at Courtray, very near to the field where this 
 battle was fought, that Robert of Artois, with a French 
 army, had perished beneath the swords of the Flemings, 
 nearly a century previous. The gilded spurs of the 
 French knights still adorned the walls of the cathedral 
 of Courtray. The victory of Rosebecque in the eyes of 
 Charles had not sufficiently repaid the former defeat : 
 the town of Courtray was pillaged and burnt; its famous 
 clock was removed to Dijon, and formed the third won- 
 der of this kind in France, Paris and Sens alone pos- 
 sessing similar ornaments. The battle of Rosebecque 
 proved more unfortunate for the communes of France 
 than for those of Flanders. Ghent, notwithstanding 
 her loss of 9000 slain, did not yield to the conqueror, 
 but held out the war for two years longer ; and did not 
 finally submit until the duke of Burgundy, at the death 
 of their count, guaranteed to the burghers the full enjoy- 
 ment of their privileges. The king avenged himself on 
 i 3
 
 118 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 the mutinous city of Paris ; entered it as a conqueror ; 
 took the chains from the streets, and unhinged the gates : 
 one hundred of the citizens were sent to the scaffold; the 
 property of the rich was confiscated ; and all the ancient 
 and most onerous taxes, the gabelle, the duty on sales, 
 as well as that of entry, were declared by royal ordon- 
 nance to be established anew. The principal towns of 
 the kingdom were visited with the same punishments 
 and exactions. The victory of Rosebecque overthrew 
 the commons of France, which were crushed under the 
 feet of the young monarch and his nobles. 
 
 The wish of Charles the Sage had been, that his son 
 should marry a German princess : Isabella of Bavaria was 
 mentioned. She was induced to make a pilgrimage to 
 Amiens, where the young king saw her and admired her 
 beauty. His marriage took place in a few days after. 
 The following year was spent in mighty preparations 
 for an invasion of England : a large fleet and army was 
 assembled at Sluys, and every province was drained of 
 men and provisions to complete the expedition. The 
 king himself was eager to embark ; but his uncle, the 
 duke of Berri, not famed for courage, purposely delayed 
 the departure, and the project was finally abandoned. 
 
 At length the young king liberated himself from the 
 tutelage of his uncle. He declared in council that he 
 alone would conduct the affairs of the kingdom for the 
 future : he changed his ministers, and gave the post 
 commanding the chief influence to the constable De 
 Clisson, a friend of Du Guesclin, and like him a Breton. 
 De Clisson was a grim old veteran ; brave, unyield- 
 ing, and having many enemies, among whom was the 
 duke of Britany, lately reconciled to France. One night 
 the constable was attacked by a band of assassins in the 
 street, and left for dead. The perpetrator of this out- 
 rage, De Craon, fled to Britany ; the king vowed ven- 
 geance, and raised an army to punish the duke of Bri- 
 tany and De Craon. As he was leading it from the 
 town of Le Mans, in a burning day of August, a maniac 
 rushed from an adjoining wood, seized his bridle, and
 
 1392. INSANITY OF CHARLES VI. 119 
 
 told him he was betrayed : soon after, the spear of one 
 of his attendants fell on the helmet of another ; the 
 king was alarmed, and thought of the menaced treachery. 
 The fright disturbed his reason, and, drawing his sword, 
 Charles attacked his followers, slew some of them, who 
 made no resistance, till he flew at his brother the duke 
 of Orleans ; they then perceived his loss of reason. 
 He was deprived of his arms, and reconducted to 
 Paris. The royal dukes resumed their hold of power : 
 Burgundy menaced the constable, threatening to beat 
 out "his other eye;" and De Clisson fled to his castle 
 for safety. During the recovery of the king, another 
 accident happened, to which his madness has been ge- 
 nerally attributed. There was a masquerade, in which 
 Charles and some of his courtiers appeared in the dis- 
 guise of satyrs, dressed in shirts daubed with pitch and 
 covered with flax : these happened to take fire. The 
 king's unlucky garment was quenched in time, but se- 
 veral of his companions perished. Though this acci- 
 dent did not immediately affect him, yet the malady 
 soon after returned with increased violence, and for the 
 remainder of his life Charles VI. continued a maniac, 
 though his phrensy had lucid intervals of short dura- 
 tion. 
 
 The beginning of the century marks the breaking 
 forth of the differences between the dukes of Orleans 
 and Burgundy. The former, though brother to the 
 unfortunate king, and now at the mature age of thirty, 
 was deprived of all influence in the council or in affairs 
 of state. When Charles had thrown off the authority of 
 his uncles, the duke of Orleans and De Clisson succeeded 
 to their influence. The malady of the king threw 
 Orleans into the shade. This was the original cause of 
 rivalry ; they were two political parties struggling for 
 power. The duke of Berri was of a peaceable and 
 timid character. Burgundy took the lead. Valentine 
 Visconti, the duchess of Orleans, who had great power 
 over Charles even in his phrensy, was accused of ac- 
 quiring it by sorcery : the party of Orleans used recri- 
 i 4
 
 120 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1400. 
 
 mination : then a mutual hatred existed between the two 
 duchesses ; and divers causes, some of them scandalous, 
 are recorded. The duke of Orleans was a libertine : to 
 one of his amours at this period, France owes Dunois 
 the famous bastard of Orleans, founder of the house of 
 Longueville. The duke of Burgundy was sumptuous, 
 prodigal, and choleric.* In the struggle between uncle 
 and nephew all feelings of the public good or public 
 services were lost sight of; each pillaged the treasury, 
 when an opportunity occurred, and then blamed his 
 rival for the distress that ensued. The duke of Orleans 
 brought a body of troops to Paris ; his uncle imitated 
 him ; and for several weeks the respective armies occu- 
 pied the capital, neither daring to strike the first blow. 
 A peace was patched up between them. The duke of 
 Burgundy, taking this opportunity to visit his duchy, 
 Orleans levied a new tax, putting the name of Burgundy 
 to the ordonnance. The latter duke protested against 
 the forgery, disclaimed all knowledge of the tax, and 
 refused to share in it, alleging that the people were 
 overburdened already. This conduct and his apparent 
 disinterestedness endeared Burgundy to the Parisians, 
 and to the commons in general, while Orleans was pro- 
 portionally hated. Chance, more than the merits of 
 either duke, threw the whole weight of popularity into 
 one scale, and for the moment it prevailed. The king, 
 however, incapable as he was of using his reason or dis- 
 cretion, even in his lucid intervals, or of making himself 
 cognizant of affairs, was still allowed to recover author- 
 ity, when his senses returned. In one of these moments 
 edicts were issued, admitting the queen to the council, 
 and ordering that she should be obeyed. The duke of 
 Orleans by these means regained the ascendant, and 
 availed himself of it to pillage the treasury of a sum 
 lately raised by a severe and distressing tax. The 
 schism of the popedom at the same time contributed to 
 embroil the princes. The death of Philip duke of Bur- 
 
 * The ,'frt-nm-s, or new-year's gifts, presented by him on the 1st of Janu- 
 ary, 1W2, amounted to 40,000 crowns.
 
 1 i()7- DUKE OF ORLEANS ASSASSINATED. 121 
 
 gundy occurred about this period, and the absolute power 
 of misrule devolved, without dispute, on his nephew. 
 
 To follow minutely the alternate ascendancy of the 
 two parties, and their selfish struggle for power, would 
 but weary and disgust the reader. John, the new duke 
 of Burgundy, succeeded to his father's position ; he was 
 called John the Fearless, an epithet which spoke suffi- 
 ciently his audacious character. Not many years pre- 
 vious he had led a crusade against the Turks, and was 
 taken prisoner, with many nobles of France, by the 
 famous Bajazet. It cost the good towns of Burgundy 
 a large contribution to release him. The rapacity of 
 the duke of Orleans threw the appearance of right on 
 the side of Burgundy, who moreover professed himself 
 the foe of tyranny and the friend of the suffering com- 
 mons. New armies were raised, and again disbanded 
 after a hollow truce and forced reconciliation. The 
 princes slept in the same bed in token of perfect amity. 
 The very evening that succeeded this close renewal of 
 intimacy, a band of assassins, headed by Raoul d'Au- 
 quetonville, stationed themselves, by order of Burgundy, 
 in a street through which the duke of Orleans must 
 necessarily pass in repairing to visit the queen. They 
 sent him a false summons from her : he hastened to 
 obey it with few attendants; and was instantly set upon 
 by the assassins, who killed and even mangled him with 
 their hatchets. Great was the alarm : the duke of 
 Burgundy exclaimed against the authors of so infamous 
 a murder ; but when the provost of Paris declared before 
 the council that he had a clue to discover the perpe- 
 trators, and that he would not fail to bring them to 
 justice provided he was permitted to search the hotels 
 of the princes, Burgundy grew pale. The other princes 
 declared that their palaces were open to the provost's 
 search; but the duke hesitated, and calling aside his uncle, 
 the duke of Berri, confessed that, tempted by the devil, he 
 had instigated the murder. On the first avowal of this 
 audacious crime the princes were thunderstruck, and 
 looked at one another in silence. Natural indignation
 
 122 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1407- 
 
 was called forth. A council assembled, from which the 
 duke of Burgundy found himself excluded ; he instantly 
 fled from Paris to his nearest fortress, Bapaume, and 
 there collected forces. The princes were obliged to 
 smother their resentment. Burgundy returned to Paris, 
 openly avowed and justified the assassination of his 
 nephew, hiring at the same time a university doctor to 
 argue publicly the justice and praiseworthiness of the 
 act. " Tyrants," said the doctor, " place themselves 
 above and beyond the law ; to punish them recourse 
 must be had to means beyond the law. It is only the 
 very powerful and noble who can command these means; 
 and, consequently, with them principally it becomes a 
 duty." But what chiefly emboldened the duke to avow 
 such a crime, was the fact that the legal process of trial 
 was itself but a tedious kind of assassination ; and the 
 midnight vengeance of the bravo about as equitable and 
 respectable as the noon-day decisions of judge and execu- 
 tioner. Some time after, Burgundy committed a no less 
 atrocious act in causing Montague to be tried and hanged. 
 He was a man sprung from the people, a financier, and 
 a minister beloved by the king, who in his phrensy could 
 not protect him : his crime was his wealth ; and the im- 
 mediate cause of his death was a festival in which he had 
 eclipsed in splendour those of the princes of the blood. 
 
 The insurrection of the people of Liege against their 
 bishop, a creature of the duke of Burgundy, called the 
 latter from Paris. His influence had caused John, a 
 younger brother of the house of Bavaria, to be elected 
 bishop ; John took deacon's orders to entitle him to 
 assume the episcopal sovereignty, but he refused to be 
 priested, preferring the helmet to the mitre. The 
 Liegeois were discontented at having a profane knight 
 in lieu of a bishop ; they entreated and petitioned John 
 to take upon him the sacerdotal character. He laughed 
 at them. They rebelled and drove him out. Such was 
 the crime of the Liegeois. The duke of Burgundy 
 marched against them ; a battle was fought at Hasbain, 
 in which the burgesses of Liege were as unfortunate as
 
 1413. ORLEANS PARTY I.V LEAGUE WITH ENGLAND. 123 
 
 those of Ghent had been at Rosebecque. It is said that 
 26,000 dead were counted on the field of battle. 
 
 This victory, won by the duke of Burgundy, inti- 
 midated the party of Orleans that had already raised its 
 head in Paris. New submissions were made to him, 
 and a reconciliation, hollow as preceding ones, took place 
 at Chartres. Meantime the young duke of Orleans had 
 attained the age of manhood ; he married the daughter 
 of count Armagnac, a Gascon nobleman, of influence in 
 his rude land, warlike, fierce, and not unfitted to lead a 
 party in these days of open strife. By his aid the party 
 of Orleans was revived. Armagnac called towards Paris 
 a little army of his Gascon followers, a savage, sanguin- 
 ary race; in cruelty they far surpassed the Burgundians : 
 murder, torture, every species of violence and des- 
 truction, marked their steps. The opposite party would 
 not be surpassed in vengeance, and the civil war between 
 Burgundians and Armagnacs became marked with in- 
 human ferocity. 
 
 The city of Paris, according to its old predilection, 
 favoured Burgundy. Still its respectable citizens were 
 found wanting in zeal. Arms were entrusted to the 
 company of butchers, who formed themselves into re- 
 giments, and soon became the terror of the city. The 
 Armagnacs penetrated north of Paris. The Gascon 
 soldiers, preferring a plundering life in the midst of 
 France to their own rude and poor homes, were constant 
 to their banners. The duke of Burgundy, on the other 
 hand, could not get his Flemings to quit their families 
 and crafts for more than forty days ; he was therefore 
 obliged to call in the English. Henry IV. sent a body 
 of archers to his aid, with whom he drove his enemies 
 from the north of the capital ; this was in February. 
 In May we find Henry in league with the Orleans party, 
 who were to restore to the English, in recompense, 
 all their ancient possessions in France. The emissary 
 who bore this treaty was seized at Boulogne ; its con- 
 tents were made public, and great odium was in conse- 
 quence excited against the Armagnacs. The hapless
 
 124 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 14-13. 
 
 monarch, Charles, recovering for a moment from his 
 phrensy, joined in this indignation : he called an army, 
 displayed the oriflamme, and marched with the Bur- 
 gundians to besiege Bourges. The campaign, as usual, 
 ended without an action, in a kind of treaty. Both 
 parties felt the thirst of pillage and of blood ; both 
 wanted the courage to decide their differences in a ge- 
 neral combat. No period of history manifests such an 
 utter want of talent ; no prowess was shown except in 
 tournaments ; no statesmanship save in the planning of 
 a murder. Although the passions of men possessed of 
 power and means were excited to the utmost, yet not a 
 decisive blow was struck in policy or in arms. The 
 fortune of the struggling parties was left to events 
 to chance. Success and reverse, the former at least, if 
 not both, unearned, alternately ensued ; conquerors and 
 conquered, pursued and fled, rolling like destructive 
 waves over the necks of a prostrate and ruined people. 
 Civil wars in general, destructive as they are of peace 
 and prosperity, beget at least the virtue of courage ; yet 
 it was not so in France. The peasantry were crushed and 
 trodden down ; the nobles and knights feared to trust 
 them with arms. The Bretons and the Gascons, natives 
 of distant provinces, were the only foot-soldiers, the 
 sole infantry of France at this time ; and a handful of 
 Engh'sh sufficed in these quarrels to give the advantage 
 to either party. 
 
 The Burgundians next experienced evil fortune. They 
 had gone too far in letting loose the democratic spirit of 
 the Parisians. The butchers, whom they had made 
 paramount, abused their power, broke into the palace 
 of the dauphin, insulted him, and rendered the young 
 prince as well as the better order of the citizens weary of 
 the yoke of Burgundy. The Armagnacs were embold- 
 ened to advance upon the capital ; some of the citizens 
 took arms against the butchers. The dauphin favoured 
 the re-action, and Burgundy was obliged to fly ; his 
 party, deprived of the support of the Parisians, was 
 routed. Charles VI. marched in person against him at
 
 1415. HENRY V. SEIZES HARFLEUR. 125 
 
 the head of the Armagnacs, besieged and took Soissons, 
 of which the inhabitants of every age and sex were in- 
 humanly massacred. Arras was next invested ; but the 
 Armagnacs becoming disgusted at the tediousness of the 
 siege, as the Burgundians had been the previous year at 
 that of Bourges, an accommodation ensued, the duke of 
 Burgundy making verbal submissions. 
 
 Whilst France was thus occupied and torn by civil 
 contests, Henry V. had succeeded to the throne of Eng- 
 land : his youthful ardour prompted him to emulate the 
 third Edward and the Black Prince ; and in the year 
 1415 he embarked with an army at Southampton, and 
 landed at the mouth of the Seine. He sat down before 
 Harfleur, and took it after a month's siege. The season 
 was already too far advanced for any serious enterprise, 
 and Henry contented himself with the project of march- 
 ing from Harfleur to Calais. The French had suspended 
 their quarrels in the presence of a foreign enemy. The 
 king himself fixed his quarters at Rouen, and summoned 
 thither his knights and nobles, who thronged in numbers 
 sufficient to treble the English army. Henry endeavoured 
 to cross the Somme, but every ford and passage was 
 guarded, and he was obliged to ascend the river nearly 
 to St. Quentin ere he was able to ford. During the delay 
 caused by this march the French had ample time to throw 
 their whole force between the English and Calais. They 
 had challenged Henry to fix a clay and a field of action : 
 he replied with sarcasm, that he did not skulk within walls 
 or towns, but held his way and pitched his camp in the 
 open field ; and that they might choose any post between 
 him and Calais; if impeded, he would force his way. 
 
 The French, under the constable D'Albret, followed 
 Henry's suggestion, and posted themselves on the road 
 which the English monarch must pursue, between the 
 villages of Agincourt and Framecourt : they were 50,000 
 strong. Except the king, the dukes of Berri and Bur- 
 gundy, all the princes of the blood were present. There 
 were, however, but few Burgundians ; and a corps of 
 6000 burgesses that Paris offered to furnish was rejected
 
 126 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1415. 
 
 with contempt. On the 24th of October the English 
 army approached ; its strength is estimated by Lefebvre 
 St. Remi, who fought in the action, at 1000 men at 
 arms and 10,000 soldiers. In the night of the '24th the 
 armies encamped a league apart, under a heavy rain, 
 neither side exulting ; and the French observed, as an 
 unusual fact and an evil omen, that not a steed was 
 heard to neigh during the night. On the following 
 morning Henry, mounted on a grey pony and wearing 
 a helmet adorned with a crown, ordered his battle, 
 placing his little band of knights in the centre, so that 
 their banners were thick together, his archers at the 
 sides and strewn along the front. The French, as usual, 
 were drawn up in three lines: princes, nobles, and che- 
 valiers thronged to the front; and being flanked by two 
 woods, they had not room to extend their line or to fight 
 as they stood. Still they determined to remain on the 
 defensive. The battles of Poitiers and Crecy had been 
 lost by the French assuming the offensive and commenc- 
 ing the attack ; now they resolved to await it. Henry 
 was therefore obliged to advance, and his archers soon 
 began to send their deadly showers of arrows amidst the 
 the thick ranks of the French. Clignet de Brabant 
 and the count de Vendome were ordered to advance 
 with a body of knights to clear away the archers. In 
 this they met with bad success. The field, which had 
 been lately sown, was soaked with rain ; the trampling 
 had converted it into deep mud, and it was with diffi- 
 culty that the horses, bearing men in heavy armour, 
 could extricate themselves or perform aught like a charge. 
 The English archers were defended by stakes which 
 each man stuck before him. The French could not 
 force them. Their horses, galled and maddened by the 
 arrows, rushed back on the main body of the French and 
 threw it into confusion. The English advanced ; the 
 archers with hatchets and leaden mallets, leaping into 
 the trenches of the line, commenced the massacre. 
 Fixed in the mud, without room to wield their arms, or 
 discipline to hold together and afford mutual aid, the
 
 1415. BATTLE OF AGINCOURT. 127 
 
 French knights were either slain, or, by uncovering their 
 heads, made themselves known and surrendered. The 
 second and third lines, composed of the least eminent of 
 the French, made no resistance, but instantly fled. The 
 English dared not to pursue. They were outnumbered 
 and surrounded by their prisoners and vanquished ene- 
 mies ; and a body of them having presented a show of 
 resistance, Henry felt obliged to give orders that each 
 man should kill his prisoners. This was refused ; and 
 he commanded 200 archers especially to execute this 
 odious task. Thus, many of the French were massacred 
 in cold blood, until Henry, seeing that his fears were 
 not founded, put a stop to the slaughter. It has been 
 said by historians, and has been generally repeated, that 
 the three great defeats of the French were principally 
 owing to the mad impetuosity, the absurd courage, of the 
 nobles. Hume, a favourer of the French nation and of 
 gentility, has accredited this. It is not easy to see in 
 this the cause of their reverses. At Agincourt certainly 
 they showed rather a want of manhood. Caution was 
 observed in every movement. Though five times more 
 numerous than the English army, they still kept on 
 the defensive, and, when attacked, they surrendered 
 in a panic : they had here no Du Guesclin, no Bayard, 
 no gallant king John ; even the barbarous and san- 
 guinary quarrel between Orleans and Burgundy had 
 stifled courage as well as humanity in the national 
 character. 
 
 It is but fair to remark, that in these days of shame 
 the family of Bourbon bore their escutcheon without a 
 stain. One duke had fallen at Crecy ; another in the 
 subsequent war ; and a prince of the house, at Poitiers. 
 The reigning duke of Bourbon had shown honest indig- 
 nation at the murder of the duke of Orleans, and had 
 retired from court and public life, rather than counte- 
 nance the murderer or submit to him. He re-appeared 
 at Agincourt, and was made prisoner there, together 
 with the young duke of Orleans. 
 
 Agincourt proved a victory more for the Burgundians
 
 128 HISTORY OP FRANCE. J 11.3. 
 
 than for the English. Henry marched to Calais without 
 seeking farther advantages. But Burgundy, though he 
 had lost two sons in the action, had his army of fol- 
 lowers unbroken ; whilst the captivity of the duke of 
 Orleans, and the death of the constable and other leaders, 
 left their side destitute. The activity of count Armagnac 
 sufficed, however, to rally and support the party. He 
 was appointed constable; and he still held possession of 
 Paris, and kept the Burgundians at bay. The Parisians, 
 wearied with the tyranny of the Armagnacs, regretted 
 their infidelity to the cause of Burgundy. Count Ar- 
 magnac, who saw their fickleness, redoubled his cruel- 
 ties, and resolved to repress treason by terror. Never- 
 theless, some of the citizens opened one of the gates of 
 Paris to the Burgundians in the night. The Armag- 
 nacs were routed ; the count himself, and his principal 
 supporters, were seized and imprisoned. The butchers 
 and all the Burgundian rabble that had been exiled 
 returned, and vengeance on the Armagnacs became the 
 general cry. Those suspected of favouring the Orleans 
 party were massacred. The prisons, full of unfortunate 
 victims, were forced by the populace, and all found 
 within were slaughtered. When the populace had got 
 possession of the Chatelet, the prisoners were summoned 
 one by one, and as they issued forth their heads were 
 struck off. Four bishops and two parliamentary presi- 
 dents perished in this sanguinary prelude to scenes that 
 disgraced the same spot at a period nearer to our times. 
 Count Armagnac himself did not escape. After massa- 
 creinghim,the Burgundians cut from his body an echarpe, 
 or sash of flesh, in derision, a white sash being the em- 
 blem of the Armagnacs. The pen shrinks from exciting 
 disgust by detailing the horrible cruelties committed. 
 
 The reader is, no doubt, surprised at the total silence 
 of the church amidst these feuds : but the power of the 
 popedom was divided and nullified at this period by a 
 schism ; and rather unfortunately, for there never was 
 a period during which its authority might have been 
 used with greater advantage to the public peace.
 
 DUKE OF BURGUNDY ASSASSINATED. 129 
 
 Henry V, returned to follow up his victory. He 
 made himself master of Normandy ; Rouen surrendered 
 to him in January, 1419; and he thence advanced 
 towards Paris. These successes of a foreign enemy 
 naturally tended to unite the adverse parties. That of 
 Orleans had now at its head Charles the dauphin. He 
 was the fifth son of Charles VI. that had borne this 
 title, his four elder brothers having died successively. 
 Charles was a mere stripling, surrounded by the old 
 captains of the Armagnacs, who, under cover of a re- 
 conciliation in order to repel the English, meditated 
 to satisfy their private revenge upon the duke of Bur- 
 gundy. A conference was agreed on between the 
 duke and the dauphin. They were to meet on the 
 bridge of Montereau, each attended by ten knights. 
 The duke was repeatedly warned not to trust himself 
 to his enemies; but it was remarked, that, since the 
 massacre of Paris, he seemed infatuated, and that he 
 had lost his usual activity and prudence. He had no 
 sooner bent his knee before the dauphin, than Tanneguy 
 du Chatel pushed him down, and struck him with his 
 axe : the blow was followed up by others ; and the duke 
 of Burgundy fell murdered at the feet of the dauphin, 
 who did not deny his participation in the deed. Thus 
 John the Fearless encountered a fate similar to that 
 which he had inflicted on his rival and nephew, the 
 duke of Orleans. 
 
 Never was crime more impolitic. Paris became ir- 
 reconcilably hostile to the dauphin, Philip, the young 
 duke of Burgundy, thought but to revenge his father ; 
 and, hastening to Henry V., tendered to him the crown 
 of France, with the promise of his utmost aid to support 
 his claim. The treaty of Troyes was soon after con- 
 cluded between them, queen Isabel acting and signing for 
 the king. By this treaty, Henry V. espoused Catherine, 
 the daughter of Charles VI., and was to succeed to the 
 throne of France, the government of which immediately 
 devolved on him as regent, pending the incapacity 
 of the king. The duke of Burgundy did homage to
 
 130 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1422. 
 
 Henry for his fiefs, and acknowledged him his future 
 sovereign. The magistrates, the people of Paris, and 
 the states-general assembled, were witnesses and parties 
 to the treaty ; nor did they murmur to see the kingdom 
 conveyed to a stranger, so profound was their hatred 
 of the dauphin and the party of Orleans. Henry V., 
 however, did not live to wear the crown of France ; he 
 expired at Vincennes, in August, 1422. The helpless 
 Charles VI. survived him nearly two months. 
 
 There is no progress to record ; no institutions took 
 birth during this melancholy reign : civilisation, in a 
 moral view, much retrograded ; in a political view, made 
 no advance. A total want of principle or rational mo- 
 tive was equally observable in the individual and in the 
 mass. The sentiment of patriotism was utterly extin- 
 guished ; and with it the esprit du corps, the spirit of 
 caste or class, which gives vigour to the social frame, 
 and which, in a rude age especially, is far preferable to 
 that baser spirit of party, which consists not in principles 
 or political views, but in a mere blind attachment to 
 individuals or families, to a badge or a name. Church 
 and king, aristocracy and democracy, fade from the 
 scene as the reign of Charles VI. advances. The Bur- 
 gundian, indeed, for a brief space, gives to his cause a 
 popular colour, but soon ceases to affect this, or even 
 recollect it. The burgesses and nobles themselves be- 
 come too much absorbed in the quarrel, to form a third 
 or a national party. The nation, splitting itself to abet 
 personal feuds without a single principle or true interest 
 at stake, continuing them from that savage love of ven- 
 geance and that eagerness to retaliate crime by crime 
 which characterise the most barbarous and unformed 
 state of human society, disappears, and becomes extinct. 
 On the contrary, the parties both of Lancaster and York 
 were obliged not only to flatter the people, as Burgundy 
 commenced by doing, but to sanction their privileges 
 and to amend the abuses of government ; and thus 
 England, either from her compactness, public spirit, or 
 better fortune, acquired at a critical period an immense
 
 1424. BATTLE OP VERNEUIL. 131 
 
 advantage over her neighbour in the race of political 
 civilisation. 
 
 France was now openly divided between rival monarchs. 
 The infant Henry VI. was proclaimed in Paris, and all 
 the northern parts of the kingdom obeyed his uncle, the 
 duke* of Bedford, as regent. The countries south of 
 the Loire acknowledged Charles VII., the late dauphin, a 
 youth of affable manners, amiable, and naturally weak in 
 character. Adversity, remedying the latter defect, had 
 rendered him prudent, crafty, and even bold j for with 
 the slaying of the duke of Burgundy he commenced his 
 career. WTienever the pressure of his foes relaxed so as 
 to allow him tranquillity, he manifested that love of plea- 
 sure which was the characteristic of the house of Valois. 
 He could not indulge, however, in the prodigality of his 
 uncles : the difficulty with which, at this time, he even 
 furnished his table is recorded. He rather inclined to 
 the pursuit of gallantry, the most venial of kingly vices. 
 
 By his enemies Charles was called, in derision, " the 
 little king of Bourges," from the town in which he 
 chiefly resided ; and so low had fallen his prospects and 
 resources, that this raillery to him must have had all the 
 bitterness of truth. Such were the neglect of discipline 
 and want of confidence in the French, since the day of 
 Azincourt, that he placed small reliance on them. Sol- 
 diers were solicited from Milan and from Scotland. 
 The earl of Buchan had arrived with 5000 or 6000 of 
 his countrymen to aid the dauphin, before the death of 
 the late king. He had defeated the English at Beauje, 
 where the duke of Clarence was slain. Charles was so 
 delighted with this first success of his cause, that he 
 created the earl of Buchan constable of France. These 
 advantages did not continue. A body of Scotch and 
 Spaniards, in the service of the dauphin, was defeated at 
 Crevant. At Verneuil a general engagement took place 
 between the English under the duke of Bedford, and 
 the united French and Scotch under the count de Nar- 
 bonne and the earls of Douglas and of Buchan. The 
 K 2
 
 132 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1424. 
 
 French abandoned their custom of drawing up in se- 
 parate lines. Both armies gathered in a mass, the En- 
 glish flanked by their archers, the French by Lombard 
 horse. The Lombards appear to have been successful, 
 but soon abandoned fight for pillage. The mass of both 
 armies charged together, and there ensued a furious 
 melee, which lasted an hour. The French were routed. 
 Harcourt, Aumale, and Narbonne, as well as the earls 
 of Douglas and Buchan, were slain. 
 
 This was a dreadful blow for Charles : not a town 
 north of the Seine held out against the duke of Bedford; 
 and it was apprehended that, should he attempt to cross 
 that river, Charles was without an army to oppose him. 
 Fortune interfered, however, at this time, interrupted 
 the successes of the English, and finally broke off that 
 powerful alliance with Britany and Burgundy which 
 rendered them masters of the north. Jaqueline, heiress 
 of Hainault and Holland, had been given in marriage 
 by the duke of Burgundy, her feudal guardian, to the 
 duke of Brabant ; she was a woman of spirit and beauty, 
 and soon began to despise her husband, who was a 
 feeble character. She left him, fled to England, ob- 
 tained a nullification of her marriage vow from pope 
 Martin, and married the duke of Gloucester, brother of 
 the duke of Bedford, and his colleague in the regency. 
 Gloucester claimed his wife's heritage of Hainault, and 
 raised an army to support his pretensions ; thus expend- 
 ing in his private cause the resources which might have 
 been employed for the subjugation of France. Still 
 worse than this, the claim brought an English prince in 
 hostility with the duke of Burgundy, -who supported 
 his vassal of Brabant. Charles about the same time 
 won over the duke of Britany from England, through 
 the means of the count De Richemont, his brother ; 
 this prince had been taken at Agincourt, and had con- 
 ceived a mortal hatred to the English. The king gave 
 him the office of constable, vacant by the death of the 
 earl of Buchan ; and in return for this, the count de- 
 tached Britany from the interests of England. These
 
 1428. SIEGE OF ORLEANS. 133 
 
 ill-timed quarrels and crosses checked the progress of 
 the duke of Bedford, who was obliged to return to 
 England; and Charles VII., in his retreat beyond the 
 Loire, enjoyed a couple of years' respite from the attacks 
 of his formidable adversaries. 
 
 Yet the interval was not occupied in defensive pre- 
 parations, but in those petty intrigues and struggles for 
 power which haunt even the shadow of a court. Charles 
 was much given to private friendship : this, which is a 
 virtue in ordinary life, proved a vice upon the throne ; 
 and the stern warriors, or the proud nobles, who would 
 not stoop to win the personal affection of the monarch, 
 looked with eyes of hate on those w r ho did. The new 
 constable, above all, could not bear a rival ; and the 
 king, who liked not his domineering character, always 
 offered one to him. De Giac, the favourite, was sur- 
 prised and carried off by order of the constable, who 
 put an end to his life by drowning. The king could 
 not exist without a private friend : he accepted one from 
 the constable, in Louis de la Tremouille, whom Riche- 
 mont soon found to be a rival and an enemy as trouble- 
 some as Giac. 
 
 The English at length resolved to strike a blow that 
 should decidedly crush the hopes of Charles. They 
 laid siege to Orleans, the principal town and support of 
 his party, its chief and last strong hold. Charles now- 
 felt that the struggle was for his crown. His bravest 
 captains flung themselves into the place, and every 
 exertion was made for a vigorous and successful resist- 
 ance. The enterprise undertaken by the English was 
 arduous. Orleans, washed by a broad and rapid river, 
 could not, but with great difficulty, be invested. The 
 earl of Salisbury first endeavoured to carry it by assault, 
 but was slain by a stone from an engine. Lord Suffolk, 
 who succeeded him, undertook the hopeless task of a 
 blockade ; but as the town was always free to ingress 
 and egress, at least of warriors, this operation was rather 
 a campaign than a siege. The bastard of Orleans, La 
 Hire, and Saintraille, were the heroes of the French. 
 K 3
 
 134 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1428. 
 
 As the war ceased to be civil and grew national, heroism 
 and military talent sprung up. By the acknowledgment 
 of their own historian, the French learned skill and 
 discipline from their enemies. The three French leaders, 
 with John Stuart, constable of the Scotch, attacked an 
 English convoy under sir John Fastolffe : they were 
 routed ; and the Scotch, with their leader, were slain to 
 a man. It being time of Lent, the convoy was of her- 
 rings, and the action is known by this name. The 
 English still retained their superiority, and Orleans was 
 not likely long to hold out, when a personage, entrusted, 
 according to popular belief, with a celestial mission, came 
 to pluck courage from the hitherto stout hearts of the 
 besiegers, and give it, with all the enhancing force of 
 superstition, to the French. 
 
 This was Joan of Arc, a native of Domremi on the 
 Meuse, whose low condition, that of tending oxen, could 
 not stifle an enthusiastic and devout temperament. Pro- 
 phecies floated about the country that a virgin could 
 alone rid France of her enemies. Similar prophecies 
 respecting children and shepherds had prevailed during 
 the crusades, but had not proved fortunate. At an 
 early period these prophecies had fixed the attention of 
 Joan. In her lonely way of life, her imaginative spirit 
 dwelt on them ; they became identified with her religious 
 creed. During the state of ecstasy which devotion causes 
 in persons of such sensitive and enthusiastic character, 
 aught that flatters or exalts self is grasped with wild 
 avidity ; so closely is mortal baseness allied with our 
 aspirations after immortality. It could not but occur 
 to Joan, that she might be the object of these prophecies; 
 it was but a short and flattering step for her credulity 
 to suppose, to believe, that she was. The idea was 
 bright and dazzling ; she gazed upon it ; it became 
 the object of her constant meditation. When we see 
 that ill success or contradictory events can seldom dis- 
 sipate illusion in such cases, how strongly must her 
 successes have confirmed hers ! The prophecy, too, was 
 one that realises itself. To inspire confident hope of
 
 1429- JOAX OF ARC. 135 
 
 victory was the surest way to win it ; and this she ef- 
 fected. Never, by human means alone, was miracle 
 wrought more effectually or more naturally. 
 
 Joan won first upon a knight to believe, at least not 
 to contemn, the truth of her mission ; which was to 
 deliver France from the English, to raise the siege of 
 Orleans, and bring Charles to be crowned at Rheims. 
 Her credit soon extended from knights to nobles. 
 Charles himself, in that crisis when men grasp at straws, 
 still dreaded the ridicule of being credulous, and the 
 danger of meddling with sorcery; a priest re-assured 
 him. The simple, modest, and pious conduct of Joan 
 herself gained upon the monarch, and even upon his 
 warriors. She was provided with armour, attendants, 
 troops ; and in this train entered Orleans. The besieged 
 were elated beyond measure ; the English, whom her 
 fame had already reached, were proportionally cast down. 
 Superstition was then the ruler of men's minds, the 
 great dispenser of hope and fear ; the immediate hand 
 of providence was seen in every event. The world did 
 not comprehend, nor could it have been reconciled to, 
 that long chain of causes and effects which separates, 
 it might be said which exiles, us of this day from 
 heaven, and renders the Deity, like his Platonic shadow, 
 careless and uncognizant of human destinies. 
 
 Joan soon sallied forth against the English entrench- 
 ments. Already, since the rumour of her presence, 
 they had abandoned the offensive, and even allowed a 
 convoy of provisions to enter the town between their 
 posts. The inactivity of superstitious terror was attri- 
 buted to Joan's magic influence, and became morally 
 infectious. Suffolk was driven from each of his bastilles, 
 or wooden towers, successively. A fort held by sir 
 William Gladesdale made the most stubborn resistance. 
 In vain, for a day's space, did the flower of the French 
 continually renew the assault ; Joan herself led them, 
 when she was transfixed by an arrow ; she fell, and 
 a woman's weakness for an instant showed itself: 
 she wept ; but this paroxysm of sensibility was akin 
 K 4
 
 136 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1429. 
 
 to that of devotion. Her visions came, her protector 
 saint Michael appeared ; and, if we are to believe the 
 testimony of the French knights, she got up and fought 
 till the gallant Gladesdale was slain and his fort taken. 
 The English immediately raised the siege. Joan, hav- 
 ing accomplished so considerable a portion of her pro- 
 mises, would not allow the enemy to be pursued. 
 
 The gratitude of Charles was proportionate to the 
 benefits he had received. He no longer doubted the 
 divine mission of his preserver. A fresh victory gained 
 over the English at Patay, in which Fastolffe showed 
 a want of courage, and the gallant Talbot was made 
 prisoner, greatly increased the confidence of Charles. 
 Joan proposed to conduct him to be crowned at Rheims. 
 It was distant ; many strong towns, that of Troyes for 
 example, intervened, all garrisoned by hostile troops. 
 Still Joan prevailed and kept her word. Troyes sur- 
 rendered, and Rheims also, where the coronation of 
 Charles VII. fulfilled the mission of the maid of 
 Orleans. Paris itself was next attacked; but this was 
 too hardy an enterprise. Joan was wounded in an 
 assault upon the gate and boulevard St. Honore, and 
 the French were obliged to retreat. The exploits of 
 Joan were drawing to a term ; she was herself aware, 
 and hinted, that much longer time was not allowed her. 
 She was taken by the English as she headed a sortie 
 from Compiegne. Her capture was considered tanta- 
 mount to a victory : it was one, however, replete with 
 dishonour to the English. They bound and used every 
 cruelty towards the hapless maid of Orleans ; raised 
 accusations of sorcery against her, whose only crime 
 was man's first duty, to make a religion of patriotism. 
 With all the meanness and cruelty of inquisitors, they 
 laid snares for her weakness, and employed every effort 
 to shake her confidence in her own purity and vir- 
 tue. She yielded a moment under their menaces and 
 false promises, through exhaustion and hunger, but she 
 always rallied back to courage, averred her holy mis- 
 sion, and defied her foes. She was burnt in the old
 
 14-37- CHARLES VII. RE-ENTERS PARIS. 137 
 
 market-place of Rouen, " a blessed martyr" in her 
 country's cause.* 
 
 In Joan of Arc the English certainly destroyed the 
 cause of their late reverses. But the impulse had been 
 given, and the crime of base vengeance could not stay 
 it. Fortune declared every where and in every way 
 against them. In vain was Henry VI. brought to Paris, 
 crowned at Notre Dame, and made to exercise all the 
 functions of royalty in court and parliament. The duke 
 of Burgundy, disgusted with the English, became at last 
 reconciled to Charles, who spared no sacrifice to win 
 the support of so powerful a subject. The amplest 
 possible amends were made for the murder of the late 
 duke. The towns beyond the Somme were ceded to 
 Burgundy, and the reigning duke was exempted from 
 all homage towards the king of France. Such was the 
 famous treaty of Arras, which restored to Charles his 
 throne, and deprived the English of all hopes of retain- 
 ing their conquests in the kingdom. The crimes and 
 misrule of the Orleans faction were forgotten ; popularity 
 ebbed in favour of Charles ; the prudence and success 
 with which he had retrieved his fallen fortunes augured 
 well for the firmness and wisdom of his reign. One of 
 the gates of Paris was betrayed by the citizens to the 
 constable and Dunois. Willoughby, the governor, was 
 obliged to shut himself up in the Bastile with his gar- 
 rison, from whence they retired to Rouen. Charles VII. 
 entered his capital, after twenty years' exclusion from it, 
 in November, 143?. Thenceforward the war lost its 
 serious character. Charles was gradually established on 
 his throne, and the struggle between the two nations was 
 feebly carried on, broken merely by a few sieges and 
 enterprises, mostly to the disadvantage of the English. 
 
 * Among the memorials of the defeat of the English preserved in 
 France, was a statue erected to Joan d'Arc in Orleans, and a rich banner 
 taken from the earl of Warwick at the siege of Montargis, which the inha- 
 bitants of the latter town were accustomed to bear in procession every year. 
 At the commencement of the Revolution, however, as Anquetil informs us, 
 it was considered unworthy to celebrate triumphs over England, the " classic 
 land of liberty ;" Warwick's flag was burned at Montargis, and the men of 
 Orleans threw down the statue of the Pucelle. In six months after (aads 
 he) the two nations were at war.
 
 138 HISTORY OP PRANCE. 1437. 
 
 This return to order, this removal of civil discord 
 and a foreign enemy, restored to action the natural 
 springs of the political machine. The king, resuming 
 his power, gradually exerted it in ordonnances ; the no- 
 bility, or rather the princes of the blood, began to unite 
 and present remonstrances to the monarch. With the 
 view of forming an aristocratic party, the duke of Bur- 
 gundy procured the release of the duke of Orleans from 
 captivity, and a reconciliation took place between them, 
 which gave such umbrage to Charles, that he forbade 
 the latter to repair to court. A conspiracy was soon 
 after formed between the princes and La Tremouille 
 against the constable : Louis the dauphin, afterwards 
 Louis XI., joined in it. The activity of Charles, 
 however, anticipated the treason. The dauphin was 
 obliged to make submission. His friend, the bastard of 
 Bourbon, was tried, condemned, sewn up in a sack, 
 and drowned. The other planners of this disturbance, 
 called the Praguerie, were pardoned. 
 
 The church, too, was roused from her long slumbers, 
 but appeared inclined rather to limit than renew her 
 usurpations. A council was then assembled at Bale, 
 which was anxious to correct the most flagrant abuse 
 of the popedom by limiting its power. Notwithstand- 
 ing the opposition of the reigning pontiff, they decreed 
 divers propositions, which they forwarded to king 
 Charles for his adoption. The king held an assembly 
 of nobles, peers, prelates, and magistrates, and by them 
 the decrees of the council were accepted. They or- 
 dained, that a general council was superior in authority 
 to a pope ; they deprived the Roman pontiff of the right 
 of appointing to benefices, ruling that vacancies should 
 be filled up by the ancient mode of election. Annates, 
 or first year's revenues, were forbidden to be paid to the 
 pope : appeals to him were limited, almost prohibited ; 
 and papal bulls were declared of no authority in the 
 kingdom without the monarch's consent. These, drawn 
 up under the title of Pragmatic Sanction, similar in 
 name and spirit to the Pragmatic Sanction of St. Louis,
 
 1444. BATTLE OF ST. JACQVES. 139 
 
 secured for many years the liberties and independence 
 of the Gallican church. 
 
 There had been frequent endeavours and conferences 
 towards a peace between the French and English. The 
 demands on either side proved irreconcilable. A truce 
 was however concluded, in 1444, which lasted four years; 
 it was sealed by the marriage of Henry VI. with Margaret 
 of Anjou, daughter of Rene, and grandaughter of Louis, 
 who had perished while leading an army to the conquest 
 of Naples. Such were the early graces and talents of the 
 young princess, afterwards so unfortunate, that, instead 
 of receiving a dowry with her, Henry gave the county of 
 Maine to her uncle. The truce embarrassed Charles by 
 the quantity of troops, which it was difficult to pay and 
 dangerous to disband. Austria was loudly calling for 
 aid against the Swiss. The opportunity was seized of 
 getting rid of the most turbulent of the bands. The 
 dauphin Louis led them to Bale on his march to the 
 mountains of Switzerland, and Burchard Monch, a rene- 
 gade Swiss, and an envoy of Austria, was to guide the 
 way. The free mountaineers, nothing alarmed by their 
 new enemies, and ill appreciating their force, despatched 
 1600 men against the 20,000 of the dauphin. The little 
 band in advancing were warned by the people of Bale of 
 their rashness. " Our souls, then, to God, and our bodies 
 to the Armagnacs," replied the gallant Swiss ; " for we 
 must on." They attacked the immense army of the 
 dauphin, and routed the two advanced divisions of it; 
 but, deserted by the militia of Bale, and surrounded by 
 numbers, all were slain. The battle of St. Jacques, as 
 this was called, gave to the French the first experience 
 of Swiss valour. The dauphin thought proper to pro- 
 secute the war no farther. Monch, the Swiss who had 
 guided the French, rode over the field of St. Jacques after 
 the action, and enjoyed the sight of his slaughtered foes 
 and compatriots. " We shall sleep to-night on roses!" 
 exclaimed he, exultantly. The exclamation roused to 
 life the indignant spirit of a captain of Uri, who lay 
 mortally wounded : he collected his remaining strength,
 
 140 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1448. 
 
 lifted a huge stone, and throwing it at Monch, dashed to 
 pieces the eyes and face of the traitor, who soon after 
 expired. 
 
 The French king was wearied with the expense at- 
 tending the troops he had hitherto employed, and with 
 their want of discipline. All were gentlemen, forsooth; 
 the very archers rode on horseback, and were followed 
 by valets. The militia of the towns formed the only 
 infantry ; and they, from their nature, could absent them- 
 selves from their callings but for a short campaign. 
 Charles resolved to imitate the English, by training the 
 country population to arms. He, first of the French kings, 
 dispensed altogether with the feudal mode of raising 
 forces, and established a regular and a standing army. 
 He formed what were called companies of ordonnance, of 
 which there were fifteen, each commanded by a captain, 
 and consisting under him of 100 lancers and men at 
 arms; each man at arms followed by three archers, a 
 valet, and a coutillier, or short-sword man, similar to 
 those formerly called brigands, who used to penetrate 
 amongst cavalry in confusion, slaying men and horses 
 with their knives. In addition to this, the king soon 
 after ordered that each village of the kingdom should 
 furnish its most expert archer, who was to be paid in 
 time of war, and in peace was to be exempt from faille 
 or tax. These were the franc archers, an important 
 institution, which armed the peasants and called them 
 forth, not at their lord's bidding, but at the king's. 
 
 These reforms were a principal cause of the disaf- 
 fection among the nobility, of which the dauphin took 
 advantage to disquiet his father. Charles, however, now 
 that he was triumphant over the external enemies of the 
 state, no longer stooped to compromise differences with 
 internal foes. He caused the duke d'Alen9on, a prince of 
 the blood, to be arrested, for having formed a secret al- 
 liance with England : the duke was tried and condemned. 
 Charles kept him ever after in confinement. Prince 
 Louis retired to his government of Dauphiny, and con- 
 tinued his intrigues and reclamations. The king mani-
 
 1453. DEATH OF TALBOT. 141 
 
 fested equal spirit and forbearance. He was ready to 
 pardon his son, but never to submit or concede to him. 
 
 In 1449 the truce was allowed to expire. The 
 quarrels of York and Lancaster had commenced, and 
 England was unable to defend her foreign possessions. 
 Normandy was invaded. The gallant Talbot could not 
 preserve Rouen with a disaffected population, and Charles 
 recovered without loss of blood the second capital of his 
 dominions. The only blow struck by the English for 
 the preservation of Normandy was at Fourmigny near 
 Bayeux. They had been successful in driving back 
 the count of Clermont, when the constable appeared with 
 a fresh army, attacked the English in turn, and routed 
 them. In the result of this action, Charles saw clearly 
 the advantages of his reform in the army. Native French 
 archers here faced their ancient rivals. Normandy was 
 for ever lost to the English after this action or skirmish. 
 The following year Guyenne was invaded by the count 
 de Dunois. He met with no resistance. The great 
 towns at that day had grown wealthy, and their maxim 
 was to avoid a siege at all hazards. Thus Bordeaux, 
 after having summoned the English by their public crier 
 to come to their assistance, a voice as likely to be heard 
 by the battling Yorkists and Lancastrians as if it had 
 been trumpeted in their isle, surrendered to Charles. 
 The submission of the Bordelais was, however, but short. 
 They rebelled; the veteran Talbot came to their aid, at 
 the head of 5000 English. The French were engaged 
 in the siege of Castillon, when Talbot marched against 
 them. His first approach drove in the franc archers. 
 This success emboldened him to attack the entrenched 
 camp of the French. Though now eighty years of age, 
 Talbot on foot led his men at arms to the assault. 
 The fight was bravely sustained on both sides, till the 
 English general was struck down by the fire of a culverin. 
 His son, lord Lisle, flung himself on the body of his 
 parent. " Fly, my son," said the expiring Talbot; " the 
 day is loet. It is your first action, and you may with- 
 out shame turn your back to the enemy." Lord Lisle,
 
 142 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1453. 
 
 nevertheless, together with thirty nobles of England, 
 was slain befpre the body of Talbot. With that hero 
 expired the last hopes of his country in regard to 
 France. Guyenne was lost, as well as Normandy ; and 
 Calais remained to England the only fruit of so much 
 blood spilt and so many victories achieved. 
 
 Charles VII. reigned nearly ten years after he had 
 thus completed the conquest of his kingdom. During 
 that time the perverseness of the dauphin chiefly occu- 
 pied and plagued him. When the king advanced into 
 Dauphiny against his son, the prince fled to the court 
 of the duke of Burgundy, who received him with hospi- 
 tality and kindness. The duke himself had a similar 
 cause of uneasiness in the frowardness of his son, the 
 count of Charolois, afterwards Charles the Rash. How- 
 ever, the young count's turbulence was but the efferves- 
 cence of passion and hot temper ; that of the dauphin 
 was cold blooded, unrelenting, and full of guile. The 
 two young princes formed an intimacy that afterwards 
 broke out into rivalry and hate. 
 
 King Charles had seen so much of the licence and 
 spirit of insubordination of great towns, that he always 
 avoided to sojourn there. The burgesses of Paris, espe- 
 cially, rigid in their ideas of domestic virtue, looked with 
 evil eyes upon the monarch's gallantries, and even in- 
 sulted the beautiful Agnes Sorel, who has redeemed in the 
 eye of history her degradation as Charles's mistress, by 
 her patriotism, and by the zeal she displayed in rousing 
 the monarch from pleasure to the active duty of recover- 
 ing his kingdom. Agnes, called demoiselle du roi, was 
 the first of the subsequently long and disgraceful list of 
 king's mistresses. For the above reasons Charles resided 
 at remote chateaux, far from the capital, an example 
 followed by his successor. This rustication of king and 
 court was attended with important consequences, and 
 was not the least of the causes that contributed to render 
 absolute the royal authority. Charles suffered from an 
 abscess in the mouth at one of these retreats, Meung- 
 sur-Yevre : word was secretly brought to him that an
 
 1461. CHARACTER OF CHARLES VII. 143 
 
 attempt was to be made to carry him off by poison. 
 Possessed by this idea, he refused all sustenance for 
 several days ; and when the physicians used force, the 
 action of the stomach could not be restored. He expired 
 on the 22d of July , 1461. 
 
 Charles VII. is represented in history as a weak cha- 
 racter, for whom fortune and friends did every thing. 
 Yet, had the record of his youth been lost, we should 
 esteem him the most politic, the most firm, the most 
 valiant of princes. His chief weakness was, that he 
 seemed willing to reconcile himself to adversity, and 
 even to amuse himself under its pressure. He was not 
 of a nature stubborn enough to struggle against a driving 
 tide ; but when it became somewhat favourable to him, 
 he was alert and sagacious to take it at the turn, and 
 it triumphantly bore him on to fortune. In no reign 
 was such progress made by the kingdom in the acquisi- 
 tion of force, solidity, and order, though not of freedom. 
 One enactment principally produced this effect : it was 
 that which re-organised the army. Not only was a 
 standing force created by this means, but a standing 
 revenue also. The financial part of the regulation, 
 though apparently subordinate, was by far the most im- 
 portant. The companies of ordonnance, or cavalry, 
 were paid by a taille levied on towns. And this tax, 
 from its evident utility, being universally submitted to, 
 placed in the hands of the government a revenue, which 
 was afterwards raised, increased, and applied at pleasure. 
 Charles VII., according to Comines, never levied more 
 than 1,800,000 livres in the year. His successor in- 
 creased it to 4,700,000. This tax, imposed by the royal 
 will, was the cause of the extinction of freedom in 
 France. No votes of money being required, the states- 
 general became useless : they were never summoned ; 
 a shade of their dignity was transferred to the parlia- 
 ment, which affected to represent them ; and all their 
 legislative functions were usurped and exercised by the 
 monarch. No writer of the present age could express 
 himself with more indignation on this subject, or with a
 
 144 HISTORY OF FRANCE. l-l6l. 
 
 fuller sense of its injustice and evil consequences, than 
 Philip de Comines, the historian of that day. The 
 French nobles, says he, consented to this faille, for the 
 sake of pensions granted to them out of the sums levied 
 in their respective domains. Henceforward the French 
 gentleman held and supported the maxim, that the king 
 alone had the right of levying taxes without the consent 
 of the subject; a principle the reverse of that -which 
 ivas maintained in England by all the classes of the com- 
 munity. Here, then, did the two countries diverge into 
 different paths; the one towards despotism, the other to 
 constitutional freedom. 
 
 CHAP. V. 
 
 1461 1515. 
 
 FROM THE ACCESSION OF LOUIS XI. TO THAT OF FRANCIS I. 
 
 THE rivalry between the French and the English formed 
 the chief action of the period which we have just tra- 
 versed. During that time the political regards of France 
 were directed northwards. She had few relations with 
 the kingdom separated from her by the Pyrenees. Italy 
 was almost equally neglected : despite the claims of the 
 house of Anjou upon Naples and Sicily, which were en- 
 forced neither by alliances nor by arms. The king, se- 
 parated by Burgundy from the dominions of the emperor, 
 seldom, if ever, extended his views beyond the Rhine. 
 The monarchy was struggling on its own soil for its 
 existence. Now, however, we enter upon another period, 
 when, delivered from the hostile weight of England, 
 increased and united in territory, its powers and re- 
 sources placed at the disposal of an absolute sovereign, 
 France began to seek conquests and enemies beyond her 
 own limits. She turned her views south towards Italy, 
 whither the French monarchs were carried by their pri-
 
 1 -l6l. ACCESSION OF LOVIS XI. 115 
 
 vatc claims and passions, rather than by the interests or 
 wishes of their people. It was during these wars that 
 the great states of Europe found themselves, for the first 
 time, interested in the same struggle, and in the imme- 
 diate relations of either alliance or enmity with each 
 other. During this ensuing period, therefore, was formed 
 that European confederacy which still exists, and of 
 which the republics of ancient Greece offer, on a dimi- 
 nutive scale, the only prototype. 
 
 Louis XI. was at the court of Burgundy when he 
 heard of his father's death. The duke, who had always 
 afforded him hospitality and protection, now showed the 
 submission of a subject ; he did homage to the new 
 king for his possessions, and proposed to accompany him 
 to Rheims with his court and army. The suspicions of 
 Louis made him dispense with the attendance of the 
 latter. The duke and the Burgundian court alone were 
 present at the coronation. 
 
 The new king was of an ungainly and ill-favoured 
 person, with large head, small limbs, and an unprepos- 
 sessing deportment. Consciousness of those defects 
 made him contemn personal qualities in general, as well 
 as those who prized them : thus he despised courts and 
 courtiers, knights and tournaments; he shunned men of 
 noble and princely rank choosing in lieu of them, for 
 his ministers and officers, people of low birth who dis- 
 played talent, and who could be attached and submis- 
 sive. His first acts showed more self-will than pru- 
 dence : he felt great indignation against the counsellors 
 of his father ; they were all obliged to fly, and Louis 
 carried his resentment so far as to annul the political 
 acts of the late reign. Thus he repealed the pragmatic 
 sanction, and sought to restore to the pope the right of 
 nominating prelates ; but his parliament resisted, and 
 Louis soon after abandoning ah 1 his selfish resentments, 
 the law against clerical usurpations remained in force. 
 The same contrariety to his father's opinions and mea- 
 sures contributed to bind the king in gratitude to the 
 duke of Burgundy, and in friendship to the duke's son 
 
 VOL, I. I,
 
 146 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1 162. 
 
 the count of Charolois : but this soon gave way to the 
 jealous and encroaching temper of Louis. He sought to 
 levy the gabelle tax in Burgundy. The duke sent his 
 ambassador, De Chimay, to protest. " Who is this 
 duke of Burgundy ?" exclaimed the king; " is he of a 
 different metal from the other nobles of my kingdom ? " 
 " Yes, sire," replied De Chimay, "he is of a very dif- 
 ferent metal ; for he alone amongst them received and 
 supported you, when you excited and fled from the 
 anger of king Charles, your father." " How dared you 
 use such language to the king ?" exclaimed Dunois to 
 Chimay. ' ' Dared ! " said the Burgundian ; " I tell you, 
 were I fifty leagues off, and thought the king had an 
 idea of using to me the words he has used, I would have 
 returned to answer him." 
 
 Duke Philip was now in years, and age had robbed 
 him of his wonted firmness and sagacity. Louis found 
 that in personal interviews he could soothe, persuade, 
 and wheedle the old duke ; the king, therefore, paid 
 frequent visits to the court of Burgundy, during which 
 he effected many of his schemes. One of them was the 
 recovery of the towns on the Somme, Amiens, Abbeville, 
 and St. Quentin, which had been mortgaged to the duke 
 for a large sum. Louis paid it, and recovered posses- 
 sion. The son and heir of Burgundy, the count of 
 Charolois, was highly enraged at these intrigues of the 
 king and the weakness of his father, and great enmity 
 sprang up between the prince and the king of France. 
 
 Almost all the great nobles were discontented with 
 Louis. A despot from natural character as well as from 
 policy, self-willed, jealous alike of rivalry or control, 
 his continued efforts had been directed to humble them. 
 He had stripped them of all their influential offices, 
 their commands, their pensions. The duke of Bour- 
 bon was deprived of the government of Guyenne ; the 
 count Dunois found himself a cipher at court, without 
 place or power ; other nobles were in prison. Louis 
 intrigued against the duke of Britany, against the 
 prince of Burgundy, and he even despatched an emis-
 
 " WAR OF THE PUBLIC GOOD." 147 
 
 sary to seize and carry off the latter. The nobility, 
 universally malcontent, united against the king, who 
 was alarmed when he saw the storm about to burst. 
 Louis hurried off on a pilgrimage to some shrine, al- 
 ways his first resource when in difficulties; sought to 
 intimidate the duke of Britany; and at length marched 
 to crush the weakest of the leagued princes, the duke of 
 Bourbon. In the mean time the king's brother, the 
 duke of Berri, made his escape, and joined the army of 
 the league. Proclamations were scattered, addressed to 
 the people, complaining of the tyranny and faults of the 
 government, and declaring that the nobles had taken up 
 arms, " solely for the public good." Hence this war 
 was called " the war of the public good." The king on 
 his side issued counter-manifestoes ; and this appeal, 
 the first instance of the kind, made by both sides to the 
 people, shows the growth of the commons in respecta- 
 bility and importance, although they were shut out from 
 political power. 
 
 Whilst the king was in the Bourbonnais, the count 
 of Charolois led his army before Paris, and passed it, 
 in order to intercept Louis, who was returning to the 
 defence of his capital. The two armies met at Monti 
 Iheri ; a skirmish commenced ; and aid coming to both 
 parties, the action became general. The king defeated 
 the wing of the Burgundians opposed to him ; and 
 Charles, equally successful on his side, was engaged in 
 hot pursuit when he was recalled by the news of his par- 
 tial defeat. The long peace had destroyed warlike 
 habits and skill ; and the generals knew as little how 
 to command as the soldiers how to fight. The king 
 succeeded in his' purpose of entering Paris, and a 
 treaty was concluded, in which he yielded to Burgundy 
 the towns on the Somme for which he had paid so 
 dearly. The government of Normandy was given by 
 Louis to his young brother the duke of Berri ; and 
 towns, domains, in short all that they demanded, to the 
 other princes. The count of St. Pol, general and friend 
 of the count of Charolois, was created constable by
 
 148 HISTORY OF FRANCE. l-iG8. 
 
 Louis, not without some hopes of exciting jealousy be- 
 tween him and Burgundy by so rich a boon. Thus, as 
 Comines remarks, was the war of the public good 
 turned and terminated to private advantage. 
 
 The king, however, had yielded solely to the pressure 
 of circumstances. He ceded every thing ; aware that,as 
 Boon as the league was dissolved, he should find means 
 of recovering all that had been wrested from him. Thus, 
 in the following year, having won over the duke of 
 Bourbon, Louis took Normandy from his brother, and 
 deprived the duke of Britany of all his advantages. 
 Duke Philip of Burgundy had died in the mean time ; 
 the count of Charolois, known in history as Charles the 
 Bold, or the Rash, was his successor. The new duke 
 was wroth against the king, on account of the non- 
 execution of the treaty, and menaced war. Louis, who 
 had a high opinion of his own address, and who remem- 
 bered that he had always soothed and won the good will 
 of duke Philip in personal interviews, resolved to try the 
 the same means with duke Charles. The constable St. 
 Pol, who negotiated between them, and was anxious for 
 an accommodation, represented the duke's temper and 
 demands as less extreme than they were. The king re- 
 quested a safe conduct, and galloped, with few followers, 
 to Peronne, where the duke of Burgundy then held his 
 court. He was received with all outward deference, yet 
 had reason to suspect that the enmity of the duke was 
 much deeper than had been represented to him. His 
 enemies were numerous, and in favour at the duke's 
 court ; and some troops, under the command of the 
 marshal of Burgundy, his declared foe, were encamped 
 near Peronne. The king, beginning to be alarmed, de- 
 manded to have his head-quarters removed to the castle. 
 In the interview of the next day Louis found that he 
 had over-rated the duke's flexibility, as well as his own 
 address ; it was impossible to bend him, or win a single 
 concession. Meanwhile tidings arrived that the people 
 of Liege, stirred up by the emissaries of the king, had 
 rebelled; had seized their bishop and the duke's lieute-
 
 1468. IXH7IS XI. AT PERONNE. 149 
 
 r.ant, and had committed many atrocities ; report added 
 that the bishop had been slain : the truth, however, was 
 that an archdeacon, who was the prelate's standard- 
 bearer, was the principal person murdered. Charles 
 ilew into a rage at this news ; he declared that the 
 king had come thither to lull him into false security, 
 whilst his intrigues excited rebellion in his dominions. 
 The gates of both the town and the castle were instantly 
 ordered by him to be closed. Shrinking, however, from 
 the act of imprisoning his sovereign, the duke pretended 
 that these measures were taken merely for discovering a 
 casket of jewels that had been lost. Charles had now the 
 late of the kingdom in his power : the monarch was his 
 prisoner ; and such was the bad faith of Louis, as well as 
 the general hatred borne to him, that to deprive him of 
 his crown would have been an act neither unpopular nor 
 wholly unjustifiable. The duke of Bern, the brother, 
 whom Louis had just deprived of Normandy, might 
 ascend the throne : a messenger, prepared and booted, 
 was in readiness to bear a message to this prince ; but 
 duke Charles hesitated: he wanted courage or decision 
 for so serious a step. Anger inflamed and inclined him 
 to listen to vengeance. His sage and prudent counsellor, 
 Comines (the historian of the period), soothed his ire, 
 and recommended an accommodation. Charles could 
 not sleep with irresolution ; he would not retire to rest, 
 but continued for the whole of the third night pacing 
 up and down his chamber. At length he became calm, 
 and consented to release the king, provided Louis would 
 accompany him against the Liegeois, whom he had 
 stirred up. The king, who passed days and nights of 
 melancholy and anxious suspense, confined in a tower in 
 which a count of Vermandois had murdered Charles the 
 Simple, was glad to obtain release on any condition, 
 however galling ; and he accordingly marched in com- 
 pany with Charles against the mutinous burgesses of 
 Liege. These unfortunate men offered to submit, but 
 Charles would not listen to them. They were worsted 
 in an attempt to surprise the duke and the king ; their 
 i. 3
 
 150 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1468, 
 
 city was taken by storm, and suffered all the pillage and 
 massacre practised on such occasions. After having 
 thus been an involuntary witness of the destruction of 
 his allies, Louis was allowed to depart. 
 
 It had been agreed at Peronne, that the duke of Berri 
 should have the government of Champagne, in lieu of 
 Normandy, of which he had been deprived. Cham- 
 pagne being on the borders of Burgundy, the prince 
 would have had always a ready support in the duke 
 against the king. This reason made the monarch ag 
 unwilling to grant Champagne as Charles was inexorable 
 in demanding it. Louis offered to his brother the pro- 
 vince of Guyenne in lieu of Champagne ; and by gain- 
 ing the prince's favourite he succeeded in making him 
 agree to the exchange. It was upon this occasion 
 that the king discovered the treachery of one of his 
 ministers, La Balue, the son of a tailor, whom he had 
 raised to the dignity of cardinal. His ecclesiastical 
 character saved his life ; but Louis confined him in an 
 iron cage, in the castle of Loches, for the rest of his 
 days. 
 
 The blunder which the French king committed in 
 trusting himself to the duke of Burgundy was the 
 thought uppermost in his mind : to have been outwitted 
 was more galling than a substantial loss to him, who 
 prided himself in his sagacity, and whose power was 
 founded much upon his character for wisdom. He 
 never would allude to the treaty of Peronne, nor would 
 he bring himself to utter the name, ordering his Serjeants 
 to wring off the necks of some poor jays, that had been 
 taught to cry " Peronne" in derision. Pretexts for war 
 against Burgundy could not be wanting. In the quarrel 
 then raging between the factions of York and Lancaster, 
 Louis and Charles espoused different sides, which led to 
 mutual recrimination. The king feared, however, to 
 combat singlehanded against so potent an adversary. 
 An intrigue which alienated, or appeared to alienate, 
 from the duke many of his allies, emboldened the king 
 to declare war. Duke Charles had an only child, Mary,
 
 1472. DUKE OF BERRI POISONED. 151 
 
 his (laughter and heir : she was eagerly sought by the 
 king's brother, late duke of Berri and Normandy, now 
 duke of Guyenne. Burgundy, who was chagrined by 
 the prospect that his rich inheritance might pass into the 
 hands of another race, would by no means promote this 
 marriage, though he did not object to the suitor. The 
 duke of Guyenne urged the king to war, hoping that 
 Burgundy's distress would compel him to grant lu's 
 daughter's hand in order to obtain friends and aid. The 
 constable St. Pol excited the king against duke Charles 
 for the same reason, also for the sake of the emolument 
 and importance of which peace deprived him. War was 
 declared. The count de St. Pol won St. Quentin for 
 the king by treachery ; and Amiens was lost to the 
 duke by the same means. A truce followed, in which 
 Charles and Louis communicated with each other, and 
 found they were both tricked by the constable. A com- 
 plicated intrigue ensued ; the duke of Burgundy consent- 
 ing to give his daughter to the duke of Guyenne, pro- 
 vided that he, with the duke of Britany, the constable, 
 and Edward of England, would unite against the king. 
 Louis was here well nigh over-reached for the second 
 time. To appease Charles, who advanced with a pow- 
 erful army, he agreed to give up Amiens and St. Quen- 
 tin, as also the constable, to the duke of Burgundy; the 
 latter abandoning his allies, the dukes of Britany and 
 Guyenne. Both determined not to execute the part of 
 the treaty which was disadvantageous to them. Charles 
 wrote to the dukes of Britany and Guyenne, declaring 
 that he would not abandon them. Louis either ex- 
 tricated himself, or was extricated, from all difficulties 
 respecting his brother, by the death of that prince, which 
 took place suddenly and opportunely. A poisoned peach, 
 which was presented to him, and of which he himself 
 and his mistress partook, occasioned the death of both. 
 Louis, who always compensated a crime by a signal act 
 of piety, invented on this occasion the angelus,. or mid- 
 day prayer to the Virgin. After such a passage of his- 
 tory as the foregoing, one may be permitted to doubt 
 i. 4
 
 152 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 14-75. 
 
 that Italy was the original birthplace of political trea- 
 chery and intrigue. Machiavel, by whose writings 
 France is supposed to have become infected with du- 
 plicity and the habitual dereliction of all public morals, 
 was only born about this period ; and truly Louis XI., 
 the constable St. Pol, and even the headlong Charles of 
 Burgundy himself, seem personages most qualified to 
 afford a lesson to the Florentine secretary himself. 
 
 The death of the duke of Guyenne broke off the 
 treaty. Charles was enraged, and entered Picardy, ra- 
 vaging and massacring the population by way of 
 revenge. His cruelty here acquired him the name cf 
 Charles the Terrible. He was repulsed, however, in an 
 attack on Beauvais. A woman named Jeanne Hachettc 
 was the first to give the alarm, and to repel the Bur- 
 gundians. An annual procession, in which females take 
 precedence, still subsists in memory of her valour. A 
 truce concluded the campaign. 
 
 It was manifest, that either from want of military 
 hardihood and skill, or from the lukewarmness of sol- 
 diers and commanders, a decisive blow could not be 
 struck between France and Burgundy. Both parties 
 grew weary of bringing armies into the field to no pur- 
 pose ; and although nominal war and real enmity sub- 
 sisted, the rival princes had leisure to turn their views 
 in another direction. Louis was at variance with the 
 king of Aragon respecting the province of Roussillon, 
 which he held by a species of mortgage, and which the 
 Aragonese had attacked. A compromise was effected, 
 the province being divided between the competitors. 
 But the object to which the French king chiefly applied 
 himself was the humbling and punishing of his refrac- 
 tory nobles. The duke of Alen<^on was thrown into 
 prison, and his duchy confiscated : the count of Ar- 
 magnac, grandson of the famous constable, was next 
 aimed at ; but, shut up in Lectour, he defied the power 
 and vengeance of the king. The royal troops besieged 
 the place, and its reduction was found impracticable : 
 icrms were therefore offered to the count. During the
 
 1473. ARMAGNAC ASSASSINATED. 153 
 
 negotiation the besieged relaxed in their vigilance, and 
 the king's general treacherously attacking, Lectour was 
 carried, and the inhabitants were massacred. Two 
 officers suddenly entered the apartment where the count 
 and his countess were sitting. The former saluted 
 them. They replied by striking the count, and putting 
 an end to his life. His unfortunate wife, saved for the 
 moment, was found to be enceinte. To her a potion 
 was administered to destroy in embryo the heir of the 
 house of Armagnac ; and it also proved fatal to the 
 countess. 
 
 The duke of Burgundy was weary of playing the 
 subordinate part of a feudatory of France. He sur- 
 passed the king himself in wealth and power, and yet 
 was curbed and humbled in dignity by a suzerain, and 
 especially by Louis, who took every opportunity to 
 thwart and encroach upon his overgrown vassal. To 
 conclude a treaty which should define the duties and 
 at the same time guard the independence of the latter 
 was impossible. Charles, seeing no other way to extri- 
 cate himself from this awkward and mortifying state, 
 aspired to sovereignty. He hoped that by extending 
 his dominions on the side of Germany he might be 
 able to renounce his subjection to France, and induce 
 the emperor to acknowledge him as an independent 
 sovereign. The bribe by which he hoped to influence 
 that potentate was certainly a great one : it was the 
 hand of his daughter and heiress Mary, who, if united 
 to Maximilian, the emperor's son, would convey to the 
 house of Austria the extensive territories of Burgundy. 
 By purchase Charles obtained the duchy of Gueldres, 
 as also the county of La Ferrette and a part of Alsace, 
 from the duke of Austria. He meditated to seize upon 
 Lorraine, of which the last duke of the house of Anjou 
 had died without heirs. Rene count of Vaudemont 
 pretended to the succession of that duchy in right of his 
 mother, daughter of Rene d' Anjou. The people of the 
 province preferred him to the duke of Burgundy, and 
 opposed the latter, who failed in getting possession of
 
 154- HISTORY OF FRANCE. 14-70. 
 
 the town of Metz. Still Charles pursued his ambitious 
 schemes. An interview took place between him and the 
 emperor Frederic, in which the duke was to have been 
 declared Icing of Belgic Gaul, and lieutenant-general of 
 the empire: Charles, however, here defeated his own 
 views by his ostentation and finesse. The emperor and 
 his ministers were disgusted with both. Charles wished 
 to have his title acknowledged ere he allowed his daugh- 
 ter to be betrothed ; and, whilst he held out stubbornly 
 on this point, the emperor departed abruptly without 
 leave-taking. Thus did Charles over-reach himself. 
 All the rich regalia that he had prepared to honour his 
 new dignity became useless. 
 
 The duke of Burgundy resolved not to be wanting in 
 the pride and arrogance of a monarch, though the title 
 was denied him. His new empire was to include the 
 whole course of the Rhine from its source. Sigismund 
 duke of Austria abandoned to him willingly those claims 
 of sovereignty over Switzerland which he himself could 
 not make good. Hagenbach, Charles's governor in his 
 new province, used every species of extortion and vio- 
 lence towards the Swiss ; and the duke, when appeal was 
 made to him, offered insult in lieu of redress. " We 
 must skin this bear of Berne," said he, " and clothe 
 ourselves in his fur." While causes of irritation between 
 the duke and the Swiss formed a prelude to war, and 
 while the enmity of the latter towards Louis still conti- 
 nued so inveterate that an alliance was formed between 
 him and Edward of England for conveying the crown of 
 France to the latter, Charles and Louis came to a mo- 
 mentary understanding for the sake, of avenging them- 
 selves on the constable St. Pol, who had betrayed each in 
 turn, and was equally odious to both. The constable, who 
 had possessed himself of St. Quentin, made overtures 
 to both parties, and offered the town to make peace with 
 either. He had an interview with the king on the 
 bridge of Noyon, with a wooden barrier raised between 
 them, which was adduced as a criminal piece of arro- 
 gance on the part of St. Pol. He afterwards fled to
 
 I IT'"'- WAR OF CHARLES AGAINST THE SWISS. 156 
 
 the protection of Burgundy ; but the duke delivered 
 him to the king, who caused him to be tried before his 
 parliament, and afterwards beheaded in the Place de 
 Greve. 
 
 Edward IV. was induced to invade France by the 
 duke of Burgundy, who, instead of joining with the 
 English, kept his troops employed in the conquest of 
 Lorraine. Edward, who loved pleasure even more than 
 glory, was bought off by Louis, who observed on the 
 occasion, that no sum could be ill expended in bribing 
 the English to keep within their isle.* " As to money, 
 that can be regained," said Louis ; " but never will I 
 yield up towns or lands to such enemies." He at the 
 same time treated with the Swiss, paid them subsidies, 
 and even succeeded so far in exciting enemies to Bur- 
 gundy, that he reconciled those free mountaineers with 
 the house of Austria, and united both in league against 
 the duke. The inhabitants of La Ferrette were excited 
 to rebel against Charles's lieutenant, Hagenbach, whom 
 they took and beheaded. The Swiss aided the insur- 
 gents, declared war against the duke, and defeated his 
 troops at Hericourt. 
 
 Charles of Burgundy had never yet encountered an 
 enemy superior to him. The gallant knights of France 
 and the stubborn burgesses of Flanders had alike been 
 quelled by him in the field. His rage was proportionate 
 to his surprise on finding himself braved by the Swiss 
 mountaineers. He marched against them from Lor- 
 raine, the conquest of which he had completed, at the 
 head of 40,000 men. Charles's natural pride of cha- 
 racter was inflated by the study of the Roman classics, 
 the taste for which was just then reviving and super- 
 seding that for feudal romance. The reader must 
 be aware that the fall of the Greek empire and the in- 
 vention of printing were events anterior to this period 
 by some years, and had contributed to render even more 
 
 * Six hundred pipes of excellent wine formed part of the bribe which 
 tenrpted Kdward upon this occasion; this caused many railleries against 
 the English.
 
 156 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 known and popular the names and achievements of Rome. 
 Hannibal was the hero whose prowess then caught 
 the fancy of Charles ; and to surmount the Alps, like the 
 Carthaginian general, was now his glorious aim. The 
 patriotism and valour that armed the Swiss in their own 
 defence was equally enthusiastic, though unlearned and 
 indigenous. Still they sent envoys to avert the wrath of 
 Burgundy, and to offer amends and submission in return 
 for justice. " You have little to gain with us," said 
 the Swiss ambassador to the duke ; " the golden bits of 
 your bridles, the spurs of your knights, are more in 
 value than all our land contains." The duke would 
 neither listen to counsel nor hear of submission. He 
 marched into Switzerland through the valley of the 
 Arve, in the month of February, 14-76'. He besieged 
 Granson, the first place that made resistance. The 
 garrison, though brave, were tricked by a renegade Swiss 
 called Ramschwag, then in the duke's service, to sur- 
 render. They were in number about 500. Charles 
 instantly ordered them to be put to death ; some were 
 hanged, some drowned. This cruelty exasperated the 
 Swiss. Each canton furnished its contingent, and an 
 army of 20,000 men marched against the Burgundians. 
 The duke had a strongly entrenched camp at Granson, 
 but scorning such advantage against the Swiss peasants, 
 he advanced to meet them on the road to Neufchatel; 
 thus offering battle in a hilly region, where his numerous 
 cavalry could prove of no advantage. The two armies 
 met on the 2d of March. The Swiss foot, embodied in 
 large masses, and armed with long halberds, bore down 
 the Burgundian knights, who in vain resisted. Charles 
 had a few archers, and no infantry in the advance ; thus 
 committing the usual mistake of the French, in deeming 
 mounted gentlemen able to repel twice their number of 
 peasants on foot. The Burgundian flank was soon 
 turned by other bands of the Swiss mountaineers, 
 amongst whom the huge and terrific horns of Uri and 
 Unterwalden were heard to blow. The battle became 
 instantly a rout : the Burgundians and their duke fled ;
 
 DEFEAT AT GBANSON. 157 
 
 losing, indeed, few of their numbers, as the Swiss had no 
 cavalry to pursue, but leaving to the conquerors the 
 plunder of a camp which rivalled that of Xerxes in lux- 
 ury and splendour. Silken tents attached with cords of 
 golden wire, velvets, tapestry, pearls, and jewels in 
 profusion, became the property of the amazed victors. 
 Plate was flung away as pewter. The large diamond 
 which the duke wore customarily at his neck was found 
 in a box of pearls ; it was at first rejected as a bauble, 
 then taken up again, and sold for a crown. It was 
 afterwards purchased by the pope for 20,000 ducats, 
 and still adorns the papal tiara. Another equally beau- 
 tiful diamond, won at Granson, was bought by 
 Henry VIII., afterwards given by his daughter Mary to 
 her husband, Philip II., and now belongs to Austria. 
 As duke Charles fled from the Alps and their fierce in- 
 habitants in the rout of Granson, his fool cried to him, 
 " Ha ! my lord, are we not finely Hannibalised ?" 
 
 The king of France had taken up his residence at 
 Lyons, in order to watch the motions of the duke and to 
 profit by his reverses. One of Charles's schemes for 
 aggrandisement was to induce Rene d'Anjou, who was 
 dissatisfied with Louis, to make a bequest of Provence 
 and his other possessions in favour of Burgundy. Rene 
 had shown himself obsequious in this respect, as did 
 the duchess of Savoy and the duke of Milan ; but on 
 the disaster of Granson all the allies of Charles forsook 
 him, and Louis secured to himself the rich succession 
 of the house of Anjou, then about to be extinct : he at 
 the same time encouraged the Swiss with subsidies and 
 fair words. 
 
 Charles was during this period at Lausanne, recruiting 
 his shattered army. He was so dreadfully dejected, 
 that he allowed his beard to grow ; and, though con- 
 stitutionally of that hot temperament which forbids all 
 vinous indulgence, his chief refection being conserve of 
 roses, yet he now took copious draughts of wine to 
 drown and dissipate his chagrin. By degrees, however, 
 he remoulded his army, recovered his spirits, his cou-
 
 158 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1 \~C). 
 
 rage, and almost his confidence ; and in June of the 
 same year, three months after the defeat of Granson, 
 Charles marched with a fresh army into the heart of 
 Switzerland. He encamped at Morat, within six leagues 
 of Berne, and instantly invested the place. The Swiss 
 collected their forces and marched to its relief. Rene 
 de Vaudemont duke of Lorraine had now joined his 
 aid to theirs, and brought them what they most wanted, 
 a formidable body of cavalry. The force of the Swiss 
 exceeded 30,000 : the duke's force was scarcely so nu- 
 merous, and was far inferior in confidence and hardi- 
 hood ; but, like a desperate gamester, he would play his 
 stake although every chance was against him. 
 
 The captains of Burgundy counselled Charles to lead 
 his force into the plain, where his cavalry might act; 
 but he was now impatient of dictation. Near the lake 
 of Morat he stationed his left, chiefly composed of 
 Italian mercenaries ; the centre was commanded by 
 Crevecceur ; he himself kept the right, with a body of 
 English under the duke of Somerset, and his archers on 
 horseback. The Swiss, as was customary with them, 
 knelt down in line, uttered a short prayer, and then 
 rushed against their enemies. On this occasion the re- 
 doubtable infantry of the mountains were kept in check 
 by the Burgundian knights, fighting under cover of their 
 artillery and camp entrenchments. The action was 
 for a time doubtful ; but the cavaliers of Burgundy 
 having all dismounted to defend their entrenchments, 
 the Lorraine horse swept the right wing ; and a body 
 of Swiss, being thus enabled to turn it, attacked the 
 camp in flank and rear whilst it was still vigorously 
 assaulted in front. Cannon and entrenchments here 
 became useless ; the struggle was hand to hand. So- 
 merset and his English, together with the best knights 
 of Burgundy, perished ; and victory was completely in 
 the hands of the Swiss : they were merciless in their 
 triumph ; they took no prisoners, and spared not an 
 enemy. All were massacred ; and the vanquishers being 
 now provided with cavalry, the flight was more destruc-
 
 1477. BATTLE OF MOHAT. 15Q 
 
 -tive than the action. Many sought refuge in the lake ; 
 and even thither they were pursued by their mer- 
 ciless enemies. The Swiss were resolved that the Bur- 
 gundians should not rally a second time, to attempt a 
 third invasion. " Cruel as at Moral," was for a long 
 while a Swiss proverb. When time had decomposed the 
 bodies of the slain, the bones were collected in a chapel 
 called the Ossuary of Morat, which for ages remained 
 as a trophy to Swiss valour and independence. The 
 French revolutionary army destroyed it in 1798. 
 
 Charles escaped this field also, and for a long time 
 concealed his grief and mortification at Salins. Like 
 Napoleon in his reverses, neither humbled nor schooled, 
 but merely angered by ill fortune, he called on his sub- 
 jects for levies, for armies ; not to secure their safety, 
 but to avenge his own disgrace. Every where, in Bur- 
 gundy as in Flanders, he found discontent and lack of 
 zeal. Rene de Vaudemont seized the opportunity of 
 recovering his heritage of Lorraine : though he was 
 unable to raise an army, yet such was the discouragement 
 of the Burgundians that he still met with success ; and 
 Nancy, the capital of the province, surrendered to him. 
 This roused the duke of Burgundy ; he quitted Salins, 
 and with such force as he could muster, amounting to 
 about 6'000 men, laid siege to Nancy in October of the 
 same fatal year, 1476. Rene de Vaudemont flew to 
 the Swiss, his allies and comrades, for aid. Although 
 interest and gratitude urged them to support him, still 
 the soldiers of the confederacy would not stir till large 
 payments and larger promises were made to them. This 
 barter of their valour for gold is the great blot on the 
 Swiss character. Charles in the mean time was losing 
 his temper and his little army before Nancy in vain, 
 during one of the most rigorous winters ever known. 
 It was not till January, 1477, that Rene with his allies 
 could come to the relief of the town. Charles was 
 counselled, in the present weak state of his army, to 
 avoid his formidable enemies ; but he scorned to retreat. 
 He was attacked by the Swiss and by Rene, in a me-
 
 l62 HISTOBY OF FRANCE. 1-182. 
 
 them from the field. The infantry on either side re- 
 mained on their ground ; but the Flemish burgesses 
 were far superior to the French franc archers, and ad- 
 vancing, routed them with ease. The previous success 
 of the cavalry yielded no advantage, and the Flemings 
 gained a decided victory. 
 
 It was after tlu's defeat that Louis abolished the in- 
 stitution of franc archers altogether ; he disliked the 
 fashion of arming the French peasantry. Instead of re- 
 quiring from each village an archer, Louis levied a cer- 
 tain sum, with which he proposed to pay an army of 
 Swiss. The French infantry, still maintained, was armed 
 by him after the Swiss fashion, with pike, halberd, and 
 two-handed sword. At any rate, a change was univer- 
 sally taking place, by which the arquebuss superseded 
 the bow and arrow. 
 
 The defeat of Guinegate humbled the hopes of Louis. 
 The war was no longer prosecuted with vigour. Even 
 the death of Mary of Burgundy, which soon after took 
 place, afforded him no opportunity of adding to his 
 usurpations. A treaty, called the treaty of Arras, was 
 concluded between him and Maximilian, in December, 
 1482. Its stipulations were, that the dauphin Charles 
 should espouse Margaret of Austria, Maximilian's daugh- 
 ter ; and that France should acquire, as her dowry, the 
 county of Artois, and that of Burgundy (or Franche- 
 Comte), with other territories; those possessions reverting 
 to Austria in case no heirs came of the marriage. Inde- 
 pendently of these cessions, Louis acquired the duchy or 
 province proper of Burgundy, as well as that of Picardy, 
 as his share of the spoils of Charles. About the same 
 time, on the death of the good king Re'ne, he inherited 
 Provence and Anjou. Rene II. of Lorraine made some 
 efforts to establish a claim, but in vain. Good fortune 
 never crowned political craft more completely than in 
 the instance of Louis XI. That monarch had now 
 brought all his favourite schemes to their completion : 
 his nobles were humbled ; his great rival was destroyed. 
 He still gave his restless spirit occupation in the chase.
 
 1483. DEATH OF LOUIS XI. 1 63 
 
 Retired in his castle of Plessis removed altogether from 
 his family without a court isolated even from his 
 ministers, who inhabited the neighbouring town of Tours, 
 he amused himself in his domain with agriculture : 
 he established a Flemish dairy, and gave his royal atten- 
 tion even to the making of butter. Executions, of which 
 he was equally fond, mingled with these more innocent 
 amusements ; and Tristan the hermit, his provost, was 
 one of his most constantly occupied attendants. An 
 anecdote of the king's summary justice is told by Bran- 
 tome. Once, when in public, he perceived a certain 
 captain whom he knew to be ill affected to him. The 
 monarch winked to his provost: Tristan thought that 
 the object of the king's justice was a fat monk who stood 
 next to the captain ; accordingly, the good monk was 
 forthwith seized, sewn in a sack, and flung into the 
 river. The captain, who saw the mistake, had in the 
 mean time fled to Amiens. The king reproached Tristan, 
 who avowed the error. " Paques Dieu!" exclaimed the 
 monarch ; " 'twas the best monk in my dominions. Let 
 half a dozen masses be said for him to-morrow." 
 
 The hand of the great executioner was at length laid 
 on Louis, who showed all the alacrity of his most timid 
 victim to avoid his fate. He made numbers of pilgrim- 
 ages, and was incessant in his vows. It was said that he 
 had recourse even to earthly aid, and drank blood drawn 
 from the veins of infants, to revive the failing current of 
 his own. He was twice struck with apoplexy : the last 
 attack proved fatal to him. Louis died on the 30th of 
 August, 1483, having survived his contemporary Ed- 
 ward IV. of England but a few weeks. 
 
 The union of oddness with sagacity forms a mixture 
 of human character, which, by a perverse kind of taste, 
 we like to contemplate. Such a specimen of this com- 
 bination as Louis XI. exhibited was never seen upon a 
 throne. Although he was as tyrannical, as crafty, and as 
 cruel, as our Henry VIII., still the French king is almost 
 a favourite with the reader of history, whilst Henry is 
 abhorred. Louis possessed a bonhonmtie, a comic humour, 
 .11 2
 
 l6'l HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1483. 
 
 which has thrown his atrocious cruelties into the shade. 
 His very absurdities plead against an unfavourable judg- 
 ment ; and in smiling at the weaknesses, we almost par- 
 don the iniquity, of his nature. That strange contrast of 
 profound sagacity in all sublunary concerns, with the 
 childish folly and pusillanimity in ideas of religion and 
 celestial influence, which were pretty much the charac- 
 teristics of the age, was carried, in Louis, to the far- 
 thest verge of all that can provoke ridicule or command 
 admiration. His crimes, also, were partly those of the 
 age ; and, in a political view, they were scarcely more 
 than proportioned to the great end that the monarch con- 
 templated. Such a compound of weakness and wisdom, 
 policy and superstition, cowardice and courage, joined 
 with all that is strange in person, manner, habiliments, 
 thoughts, makes Louis a character ready drawn to the 
 hand of the imaginative writer. It defies exaggeration, 
 and rivals in boldness and humour aught that fiction 
 can create. 
 
 The son of Louis XI. was but thirteen years of age 
 when he ascended the throne, with the title of Charles 
 VIII. Brantome calls him Charles the Little: he was 
 weak, ill-formed, and sickly ; his mind was not more 
 developed than his person, the jealous Louis having 
 denied the young prince all education as well as exer- 
 cise. The last dispositions of Louis had entrusted the 
 care of the king to his daughter Anne, wife of the lord of 
 Beaujeu, a brother of the house of Bourbon. She found 
 a competitor in the duke of Orleans, who, as first prince 
 of the blood, pretended, at least, to share the sovereign 
 authority. The principal nobles espoused the duke's side. 
 It was agreed to summon the states-general to decide 
 the question. No mention has been made of the great 
 council of the nation during the last reign. It had been 
 held nevertheless, but the members had been so packed 
 and culled as to offer no efficient resistance to the despot 
 who reigned. A fair and real assembly of the states was 
 now, however, convoked at Tours. The government 
 used every means of previous conciliation. Oliver the
 
 1483. MINORITY OF CHARLES VIII. l65 
 
 barber, one of the obnoxious ministers of Louis, was 
 hanged ; taxes were reduced ; and a body of 6000 
 Swiss was disbanded. The disorders of the reign of 
 Charles VI., and their melancholy consequences, had 
 disgusted men with the reign of princes of the blood. 
 The states conferred the care of the king's person, and 
 the influence accruing from it, upon the lady of Beaujeu. 
 The Orleans party, being dissatisfied, questioned the 
 competence of the states. " To whom does it belong to 
 decide," cried Pot, one of the members, " if not to the 
 same people who first elected their kings, and in whom 
 the sovereign authority thoroughly and territorially re- 
 sides ? " Here breaks out the republican spirit which 
 the revived study of the classics had already produced. 
 
 The three orders presented their several grievances ; 
 and we have thus an opportunity of marking the state of 
 each. It has been before remarked, that the French 
 noblesse became at an early period divided into the 
 greater and the less ; the former possessing territories, 
 apanage, sovereignty, almost independent power ; here- 
 ditary qualities, in short, more royal than aristocratic. 
 This took from them the true spirit of an aristocracy ; 
 they opposed the king, as potentate might attack poten- 
 tate, with force alone. Arms and fortifications were 
 their bulwarks. The English nobles, on the contrary, 
 from the compactness of the island and the early despot- 
 ism of the Conqueror's race, remained essentially subjects, 
 all with similar interests and views. Hence they were 
 united ; hence they aimed at common privileges, which 
 laws and institutions alone, not individual might, could 
 guarantee. As the great nobility disappeared in France, 
 either from natural decay, or by chance of war, or under 
 the hand of the executioner, the princes of the blood 
 took their place and authority : and thus a class of 
 magnates was placed at the head of the noblesse, having 
 interests quite distinct from theirs. From that time 
 opposition and rebellion no longer strove to limit the 
 royal authority. The struggle of the nobles, on the 
 contrary, was to share it, to have a seat in the council, 
 M 3
 
 lG6 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1483. 
 
 and acquire preponderance. In these selfish and per- 
 sonal quarrels, nation and class both lost sight of their 
 peculiar interest as well as of the public advantage. 
 But the danger of giving apanages was soon perceived. 
 Princes and nobles were no longer indulged with pro- 
 vinces : places and pensions were bestowed in lieu. 
 Charles VII. had begun this system ; and he was enabled 
 to do so, being the first monarch who levied a fixed and 
 perpetual tax. In this arrangement, the great nobles 
 were to have a share in the public contribution, while 
 the smaller, forming the great mass of the nobility, were 
 to be exe-ipt from paying their quota. Thus were all 
 those of iiigher birth in the nation attached to despotic 
 royalty by -i:e simple and stubborn tie of self-interest. 
 The demands of the nobles in the present assembly of 
 states were merely against being summoned by the ar- 
 riere-ban to war at their own expense. Louis XI., who 
 found that they paid no faille under the modern system 
 of collecting revenue, thought they might at least afford 
 their ancient contribution of feudal service. But no : 
 they insisted upon being freed from both, and they were 
 freed. 
 
 The clergy prayed that the pragmatic sanction might 
 be upheld, and the privileges of the Gallican church 
 defended, especially the right of election, and the non- 
 payment of annates. The tide of opinion even among 
 ecclesiastics was against Rome. Striking examples oc- 
 curred during the reign of Louis, showing how low the 
 papal authority had fallen. When Charles of Burgundy 
 aspired to a throne, it was not to the pope, that an- 
 ciently received fabricator and hallower of crowns, that 
 he had recourse, but to the emperor. When cardinal 
 Bessarion came on a mission from the papal court to 
 Louis XL, he was admitted, after a delay of two months, 
 to the royal presence. When he had made a most learned 
 speech richly garnished with quotations, the king for 
 answer sei-jd the venerable , .rdinal by the beard, and 
 repeated an absurd line from the Latin Grammar of that 
 day. Bessarion, it is said, died of chagrin at this in-
 
 IIS.'). ASSEMBLY OP THE STATES. l6j 
 
 suit ; and we hear of no indignation on the part of the 
 pope. 
 
 The tiers etat, or commons, were equally loud against 
 the pope, and prayed that no legate should be allowed 
 to enter the kingdom. They made the usual complaint 
 respecting the tail/e, and solicited the abolition of so 
 hateful a word. They hinted, that if the royal domains 
 could not suffice for the national expenditure, they would 
 be ready at all times to come forward and vote supplies. 
 Considerable difficulties nevertheless existed as to the 
 sum now to be granted. In short, the states seemed 
 most willing to adopt the economical resistance of an old 
 English parliament, when the lady of Beaujeu, growing 
 alarmed, dissolved the assembly. 
 
 The discontent of the duke of Orleans was not ap- 
 peased by the decision of the states. He was a hand- 
 some, frank, amiable man, not naturally inclined to be 
 turbulent : but as first prince of the blood, and heir 
 presumptive to the throne, it was derogatory to his 
 pride and spirit to remain tranquil, while deprived of 
 all influence by a woman. Dunois, son of the famous 
 bastard of Orleans, was his chief friend and counsellor ; 
 a man as fond of intrigue, apparently, as his stout sire 
 had been of battle. The dukes of Lorraine and Bour- 
 bon seemed at first inclined to join him, but both were 
 won over by the lady Anne ; Bourbon, the elder brother 
 of the lord of Beaujeu, being made constable. Orleans 
 tried every expedient to shake the authority of the 
 king's sister. He sought to make himself popular in 
 the capital, and to bring its citizens to declare in his 
 favour. He tried the parliament also; but its president, 
 La Vaquerie, replied, that it was not their interest or 
 duty to interfere in a private struggle for power. Or- 
 leans was soon after closely pressed by La Tremouille 
 at the head of a superior army, and obliged to make 
 submission ; Dunois being banished to Asti, a town in 
 Italy which the duke of Orler-is inherited from his 
 grandmother, Valentine of Milan. 
 
 Such a forced submission co Id not conduce to a lasting 
 M 4
 
 168 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1188. 
 
 peace. Dunois soon afterwards returned from exile. 
 There was a plot for carrying off the king, which failed, 
 and the duke of Orleans was obliged to take refuge in 
 Britany. The gay and fascinating manners of the 
 French prince entirely won the good will of Francis, 
 the reigning duke. He was without male heirs ; and 
 his daughter, as inheritor of the duchy, was a rich 
 prize for an ambitious prince. The duke of Orleans 
 became a suitor for the hand of Anne, and duke Francis 
 favoured his pretensions. But the native nobles of the 
 province were jealous of the duke of Orleans and of his 
 influence with their prince. They leagued with the 
 lady of Beaujeu against both; and a French army, sup- 
 ported by a great body of Bretons, soon after besieged 
 the dukes of Britany and Orleans in Nantes. There 
 were two other pretenders to the hand of the heiress of 
 Britany: the sieur d'Albret, a rich lord of Gascony, into 
 whose family the crown of Navarre had passed from 
 that of Foix. The duke of Orleans, in prosecuting his 
 own suit, affected to support this competitor. The 
 other was Maximilian king of the Romans. A timely 
 succour sent by this prince obliged the French to raise 
 the siege of Nantes ; and the lady of Beaujeu betraying 
 a disposition to conquer the duchy, and to garrison and 
 appropriate its towns, the Bretons became suspicious, 
 abandoned her, and resumed their allegiance to the 
 duke. The war nevertheless continued. The troops 
 on both sides met at St. Aubin, and a battle ensued. 
 The French were commanded by La Tremouille ; the 
 prince of Orange and the duke of Orleans led on the 
 Bretons. With the latter were 300 English ; 1200 
 Bretons also clothed themselves in the English garb, 
 the more to intimidate their enemies. The Bretons 
 were celebrated as foot-soldiers. At St. Aubin they 
 supported their character ; but the French gendarmerie, 
 having routed the cavalry opposed to them, took the 
 Bretons in flank and rear, and routed them. The duke 
 of Orleans and the prince of Orange were both taken 
 prisoners. They were startled to perceive a confessor
 
 1491- MARRIAGE OF AXXE OF BRITA.VV. l6Q 
 
 enter their tent in the evening. Lrf Tremouille, who 
 saw and enjoyed their consternation, reassured them by 
 observing that it was only for the inferior rebels to clear 
 their consciences and prepare for death. 
 
 An accommodation followed this defeat. The duke 
 of Britany made submissions, and survived but a short 
 time. He was the last duke of the province, which 
 now descended to his daughter Anne. There was an- 
 other sister, who, as she died soon after, need not be 
 more than mentioned. Affairs were now as unsettled as 
 ever. The count d'Albret, seconded by a strong party 
 of Bretons, who above all things aimed at the indepen- 
 dence of their duchy, pushed his suit with the young 
 heiress. The addresses of this aged noble could not be 
 agreeable to a princess of fourteen. The duke of Or- 
 leans, the object of her predilection, was in prison. The 
 armies of France were invading the duchy, and it be- 
 hoved her to espouse a prince capable of defending her 
 dominions. The resolution was taken that she should 
 be married to Maximilian king of the Romans, and the 
 ceremony was accordingly performed by proxy ; the 
 archduke's ambassador, to conclude it, putting a naked 
 leg into the couch of the young duchess. Hitherto the 
 aim of king Charles and his regent sister had been to 
 conquer the duchy by force of arms, laying claim to it 
 as a male fief. Charles had been long betrothed to 
 Margaret of Austria, Maximilian's daughter, who was 
 then receiving her education in the French court, and 
 awaiting the years of nubility. The stubbornness of 
 the Bretons, however, made the lady of Beaujeu despair 
 of her project. The ever-ready Dunois, in order to 
 make his own peace and procure the liberty of the duke 
 of Orleans, proposed that Charles should espouse the 
 young duchess himself, and thus unite Britany to the 
 kingdom. Charles and his sister instantly entered into 
 this scheme. The king, with a kingly generosity, began 
 by setting the duke of Orleans, his secret rival, at liberty. 
 This the monarch did without consulting his sister ; 
 nor was his generosity abused, for the duke remained
 
 1~0 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 ever afte. faithful to him, and even seconded his pur- 
 pose of espousing Anne. Dunois, on his side, laboured 
 to render the duchess less hostile to France. Anne still 
 held with all the faithfulness of a wife to Maximilian, 
 to whom she was nominally betrothed. An ostensible 
 act of compulsion was deemed requisite to overcome her 
 reluctance. A royal army besieged her in Rennes. 
 One of the conditions of the capitulation was, that she 
 should espouse the king of France. This marriage 
 really as well as ceremoniously took place.* The inacti- 
 vity of Maximilian lost him a richly endowed consort, 
 and at the same time brought a severe mortification upon 
 his daughter Margaret. She, who had been brought 
 up as the future queen of France, was now sent home, 
 as she herself expressed it, " a widow ere she was a 
 wife." This rejection was not unattended with loss to 
 the French monarch, who was compelled to restore 
 Artois and Franche-Comte, acquired as the dowry of 
 Margaret. Thus, within a short period, were the two 
 most considerable fiefs of the ancient feudal kingdom of 
 France, viz. Burgundy and Britany, united finally to 
 the crown. Flanders, the remaining province, followed 
 other fortunes ; for while France gradually extended 
 her dominions eastward, by encroaching on the empire, 
 the house of Austria gained possession of the rich pro- 
 vince of Flanders, originally French, which gave her the 
 advantage of seaports, and one of the richest manufac- 
 turing and commercial regions in the world. 
 
 There never was a period of history in which the ef- 
 forts of individual minds were so important in their 
 effects as the present. The inventions of one or two 
 artisans on the banks of the Rhine presented mankind 
 with the art of printing ; an idea, a theory, springing 
 up in the manly mind of Columbus, led to the discovery 
 of another hemisphere ; a whim conceived by Charles 
 VJII., who, from hearing tales of Caesar and Charle- 
 magne, ! ddenly became desirous of turning conqueror, 
 had more effect on the destinies of Europe than all 
 
 * Dec. 1491.
 
 CHABLES VIII. INVADES ITALY. 171 
 
 those occult causes of human progress which the philo- 
 sopher of history loves to fathom. It has been related, 
 how the first house of Anjou conquered Naples, and 
 how Jeanne, its last princess, conveyed her right to 
 Charles of Anjou, brother of the unfortunate Charles VI. 
 His right descended to his grandson Rene, who be- 
 queathed it to Louis XI. In short, the claim of the 
 reigning house of France to Naples was such as only a 
 powerful monarch could assert. An illegitimate branch 
 of the royal house of Anjou was then in possession of 
 Naples. There was enmity between him and Ludovico 
 Sforza, who then governed Milan. The latter, in t^ : 
 meddling spirit of Italian intrigue, sent ambassadors to 
 excite Charles of France against the king of Naples; 
 but the French king, instead of menacing or intriguing, 
 entered seriously into the project, summoned his bravest 
 soldiers and captains, and invaded Italy at the head of 
 a large army. No one was more surprised and alarmed 
 at this promptitude, to which Italy was so little accus- 
 tomed, than Ludovico himself, whose authority in Milan 
 was merely usurped over his nephew, then in prison. 
 He temporised, however, and received Charles with all 
 signs of gladness, and with great display. Most histo- 
 rians of the time describe the pomp and grandeur of 
 his reception ; and the rich habiliments of the duchess of 
 Milan are not forgotten. The first act of Charles on 
 his introduction to this dame was to ask her to dance 
 with him. This gallant example was followed by the 
 French, who were prodigal of admiration and attention 
 to the fair. Such conduct awakened the suspicions of 
 the Italians, and added to the natural want of harmony 
 between nations so opposite in character. 
 
 Italy at this time formed a federation which may 
 be regarded as the prototype of the system subsequently 
 established in Europe, where power is equally parcelled 
 forth, and where the efforts and policy of all are directed 
 to preserve the general equilibrium. The intervention 
 of a foreign potentate perplexed and terrified all the 
 members of that implied confederation : but to unite at
 
 172 HISTORY OF FRAXCE. 1494-. 
 
 once against him demanded a reciprocal confidence, a 
 readiness and resolve, which were not to be expected. 
 Those who could venture on such an act of policy, tem- 
 porised. To await another conjuncture of circumstances 
 was the favourite and timid maxim of the Italians. The 
 Venetians replied to Charles, that they were in too great 
 dread of the Turk to aid him. The Florentines, through 
 whose state lay the route between France and Naples, 
 could not follow this example of neutrality : Pietro de' 
 Medici, the man of chief influence among them, knew 
 not what path to pursue. He had an understanding 
 with both Charles and the king of Naples, and was 
 afraid to oppose or to desert either of them. Being sent 
 at the head of an embassy by the Florentines to procure 
 the king's friendship and alliance, he delivered up the 
 frontier fortresses to Charles, to gain the monarch's good 
 will for himself, thus setting aside the interests of the 
 republic. The pusillanimous traitor was soon after 
 obliged to fly from the public indignation. Meantime 
 Charles entered Lucca and Pisa. Florence opened her 
 gates to him, without surrendering her independence. 
 Charles, however, attempted to take advantage of having 
 an army within their walls to impose conditions upon 
 the Florentines. When these were proposed by Charles 
 to the principal magistrates of the town, Capponi, one 
 of them, snatched the injurious scroll from the hands of 
 the secretary, tore and trod it beneath his feet. " Since 
 such are your conditions," cried he to Charles, ' ' sound 
 your war trumpets, we on our side will ring the bells of 
 alarm." Such promptitude and courage in an Italian 
 functionary made Charles conclude that the Florentines 
 were too strong for him. Capponi was recalled, and 
 reprimanded for his wrath, but the harsh conditions 
 were no longer insisted on. 
 
 The pope Borgia, Alexander VI., stood next in 
 Charles's way. He in vain endeavoured to turn the 
 French monarch from his purpose of entering Rome, 
 but the latter asserted that he had vowed to visit the 
 tombs of the holy apostles. The terrified pontiff shut
 
 1495- NAPLES OCCUPIED BY THE FRENCH. 1JS 
 
 himself up in the castle St. Angelo whilst Charles en- 
 tered the city in the night by torchlight ; his men all 
 armed, with lance in rest, betokening that he came as a 
 conqueror. In the present day, when a place is won 
 the flag of the victors is hoisted. The first order of 
 Charles was to erect gallows in divers directions, on 
 which his provost hung a few turbulent Romans, thus 
 asserting and exercising the French king's right of juris- 
 diction. Naples itself seemed equally disinclined to re- 
 sistance. Although Ferdinand, its young prince, showed 
 himself not wanting in either prudence or valour, his 
 troops betrayed an insurmountable reluctance to face the 
 French. They fled from their posts at the first indica- 
 tion of attack. Ferdinand escaped to Ischia ; and Charles 
 made his triumphant entry into Naples, in the month of 
 February, 1495; having thus traversed all Italy at the 
 head of an army, without any bloodshed except by the 
 hand of the executioner. 
 
 To retain and perpetuate conquests is a more difficult 
 matter than to make them. Charles and his captains 
 took no pains to establish their government in Naples : 
 on the contrary, the partiality of the French monarch for 
 his countrymen, his dissipation and restlessness, as well 
 as their gallantry and violence, rendered the Italians 
 averse to their yoke. The king of Aragon in the mean 
 time leagued with the Venetians and Ludovico Sforza 
 of Milan, to drive the French from Italy. Philip de 
 Comines, then Charles's envoy at Venice, warned him 
 of the danger. It was considered most prudent to re- 
 turn to France. Gilbert de Bourbon, count de Mont- 
 pensier, cousin of him whom we have known as lord of 
 Beaujeu, was left governor of Naples. Garrisons were 
 placed in the chief towns. And thus providing for the 
 security of his new kingdom, Charles departed on his 
 return homeward at the head of scarcely 10,000 com- 
 batants. His enemies awaited him near Parma, com- 
 manded by Gonzaga, marquis of Mantua. They were 
 more than double the French in number. Charles en- 
 deavoured to negotiate, but in vain. Gonzaga posted
 
 174 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 14-95. 
 
 his men near Fornova, to the right of the road which 
 must be taken by their enemy, who, commanded by 
 La Tremouille and their monarch, did not retard their 
 march. The Italians, divided into two bodies, attacked 
 the French in front and rear. Those io front showec 
 little activity ; the rear-guard was, however, vigorously 
 assaulted by the marquis of Mantua. The French made 
 a valiant resistance. Charles himself was exposed to 
 considerable danger, as he fought in the midst of the 
 action. The Stradiots, who formed the infantry of the 
 marquis, forsook the combat in order to plunder the 
 French baggage. The knights and cavaliers of Charles 
 took this opportunity to charge a"nd beat in the Italian 
 cavalry, which soon fled. Thus a partial victory re- 
 mained to the French. They had the honour of en- 
 camping for that night on the disputed field. The next 
 morning, however, they continued their retreat ; nor did 
 they allow themselves repose until they reached Asti, 
 where the duke of Orleans was to have awaited them 
 with reinforcements. That prince had, however, made 
 use of the troops under his command to attack Milan. 
 He was now shut up in Novara. Charles, instead of 
 receiving support, was obliged to march to the duke's 
 aid. His liberation was effected by a treaty with Louis 
 Sforza. Charles returned to France, and the north of 
 Italy relapsed into its usual state of quiet vigilance. 
 
 Meantime Ferdinand was recovering his kingdom of 
 Naples from the French, who had been left to guard it. 
 His first attempt was, however, unsuccessful. He passed 
 over from Sicily into Calabria with 5000 men under 
 Gonsalvo de Cordova, known in Spain by the name of 
 the great captain. Stuart count of Aubigny, great 
 grandson of the Scotch constable killed at the fight of 
 Herrings, marched against Gonsalvo, defeated him, and 
 Ferdinand escaped with difficulty. This prince, not 
 discouraged, soon returned with a fleet, showed himself 
 before his capital, which rose in his favour, and expelled 
 the count de Montpensier. War, however, still con- 
 tinued, from the pusillanimity of the Italian troops.
 
 1498. ACCESSION OP LOUIS XII. l~i) 
 
 Ferdinand and Gonsalvo both fearing to encounter the 
 French in the open field. Charles made an effort to 
 succour his partisans in Naples. An army was raised, 
 and the command of it given to the duke of Orleans ; 
 but this prince, observing the weak state of the king's 
 health, refused to enter on a distant expedition at a time 
 when he might be suddenly called to the throne. Mont- 
 pensier, thus abandoned, saw his forces gradually di- 
 minish : he himself was shut up in Atella, and soon after 
 obliged to surrender upon conditions, ill observed by Fer- 
 dinand. Stuart of Aubigny made good his retreat to 
 France with his troops. Montpensier died soon after of a 
 malady which carried off numbers of the captive French. 
 
 Thus terminated in defeat all the ambitious schemes 
 of Charles, all his dreams of rivalling the fame and 
 conquests of Charlemagne. His sons perished in infancy 
 one after the other ; the name of the last, Charles Or- 
 lando, marking the favourite studies and thoughts of the 
 monarch. In the spring of 1498 a game of ball, which 
 interested the king, was jplayed in the fosse of the castle 
 of Amboise, where he resided. Charles, an affectionate 
 husband, brought the queen to witness it. Passing in 
 haste through the low archway of a gallery, he struck 
 his head somewhat violently against it ; for the moment 
 the blow did not seem to affect him, but soon after he 
 was seized with a stroke of apoplexy, and died at the 
 early age of twenty-seven. " Charles," says Comines, 
 " was of a small person, and little understanding ; but 
 a better creature was not to be seen." 
 
 The crown of France had now descended from father 
 to son in an uninterrupted succession of seven monarchs 
 from Philip of Valois. Charles VIII. leaving no pos- 
 terity, the direct line was broken. Louis duke of 
 Orleans, he who had been murdered by his uncle of 
 Burgundy, left two sons, the duke of Orleans and the 
 count of Angoulcme. The former, one of the captives 
 of Azincourt, and long a prisoner in England, was the 
 father of the prince who now ascended the throne as 
 Louis XII. The count of Angouliime also left a son,
 
 176 HISTORY OF F15ANCK. 1498. 
 
 cousin-gentian of course to Louis, and now heir pre- 
 sumptive : he afterwards became Francis I. Whilst 
 engaged in royal genealogy, we may glance at the house 
 of Bourbon. The sieur or lord of Beaujeu had became 
 duke of Bourbon by the death of his elder brother ; his 
 issue was limited to a daughter. The male heir to the 
 duchy was Charles of Bourbon, count de Montpensier, 
 son of him who had defended Naples for Charles VIII., 
 and who had died in that capital. By the intervention 
 of the new monarch, the young Charles count de Mont- 
 pensier married Susanne de Bourbon, thus preserving 
 united the titles and heritage of this illustrious family. 
 
 Louis XII. formed in person a contrast to his prede- 
 cessor. He was tall, agile, strong, and equally accom- 
 plished in the exercises and graces of knighthood. He 
 had sustained all those fevers in his youth that spring 
 from a quick and generous temper. He had been dissi- 
 pated, extravagant, turbulent. Like our fifth Harry, he 
 discarded these vices ere he ascended the throne, and a 
 similar spirit of forgiveness marked his accession. A^lien 
 some of his courtiers urged him to disgrace La Tre- 
 mouille, the general who had defeated him at St. Aubin, 
 Louis replied, " The king of France must not remember 
 the injuries offered to the duke of Orleans." His first 
 step was one strongly urged by poh'cy, as well as private 
 affection. He had been compelled by Louis XI. to 
 espouse that monarch's daughter Jeanne, a princess 
 deformed in person though amiable in disposition. 
 Through the pope's dispensation, as well as by the de- 
 cree of a commission, this marriage was broken, though 
 poor Jeanne pleaded with all the eloquence of injured 
 womanhood against it ; and Louis married the widow 
 of his predecessor, to whom, as Anne of Britany, he 
 had formerly paid court. Thus was secured an im- 
 portant province, which the duchess might have carried 
 to another suitor. 
 
 This great point settled, Louis published a number 
 of ordinances regulating and new modelling the army, 
 the revenue, and the judicature. In his former capacity
 
 1498. VIEWS OF LOUIS ON ITALY. 177 
 
 as a subject, an oppressed and malcontent subject, he had 
 made himself acquainted with the defects of the system, 
 which, as a king, he now applied himself to remedy. 
 The council of state, among others, he re-modelled, 
 filling it with the sage and experienced of all ranks. 
 Poor Philip de Comines, who had intrigued and suffered 
 captivity for the duke of Orleans, was now, however, 
 slighted by the king. Louis turned his back on the 
 fickle and astute politicians, the old accomplices of his 
 treason, as Harry the fifth forsook the companions of his 
 dissipations. We, however, should be grateful for a ne- 
 glect which gave Comines leisure to compose a history 
 of his times, less finished, detailed, and clear than that 
 of Guicciardini, but certes far more lively, forcible, and 
 entertaining. The chief authority under Louis was 
 given to George, now created cardinal of Arnboise, the 
 first person who ostensibly bore the character of prime 
 minister. Hitherto any attempt of a monarch to de- 
 legate his authority was considered pusillanimity and 
 crime ; but now, as foreign relations became more 
 extended and more complicated, it was seen that not 
 the weakness of private friendship, but the urgency of 
 the public weal required an experienced and influential 
 minister. 
 
 The domestic and internal affairs of the kingdom thus 
 regulated, Louis turned his views towards Italy. He 
 was eager to renew the successes and avenge the defeats 
 of his predecessor. He had not only to support the 
 claims of the house of Anjou upon Naples, but to main- 
 tain his own private right to the duchy of Milan, which 
 he pretended to inherit from his grandmother Valentine 
 Visconti. The Sforzas, soldiers of fortune, had usurped 
 the duchy, and founded their right on the marriage of 
 the first Sforza with Blanche, the natural daughter of 
 the last Visconti. Louis XI. had allied with them, and 
 had refused to permit the duke of Orleans to insist upon 
 his heritage. No sooner did the latter become Louis XIL 
 than he assumed the title of duke of Milan, and pre- 
 pared, by arms and alliances, to prosecute his claim, 
 
 VOL. I. N
 
 178 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1501. 
 
 Ludovico Sforza had usurped the duchy, and secured it 
 by poisoning his nephew : he was peculiarly hateful to 
 the French, from having been the first to entice Charles 
 VIII. into Italy, and afterwards the first to betray him. 
 His crimes made him equally odious to his countrymen. 
 The pope was won over by the gift of the duchy of 
 Valentinois, which the king gave to his notorious son, 
 Caesar Borgia. The Florentines were in the French 
 interest, and the Venetians leagued with Louis in order 
 to share the spoils of Ludovico. In short, when a 
 French army entered the Milanese in the summer of 
 1499> it raet with no resistance. The duchy submitted 
 almost without a blow, and Ludovico fled to Inspruck, 
 to his only ally, Maximilian. 
 
 The supple Italians, who never failed to stoop their 
 heads under the fury of the French storm, were sure to 
 raise them when the tempest had subsided. Ludovico 
 returned with an army in the ensuing year. The capital 
 rose in his favour. Trivulzio, who had been left gover- 
 nor of the duchy, was besieged in the town-house, and 
 was only rescued by the audacious gallantry of some 
 sixty knights, his followers. The French were obliged 
 to evacuate the province. At the first tidings of the 
 insurrection, La Tremouille marched from France to 
 succour Trivulzio. Ludovico sought to intercept this 
 aid by posting himself at Novara. But when the out- 
 posts of both armies touched, the Swiss in Ludovico's 
 service learned that their comrades in the French army 
 were better paid and treated. On the eve of action these 
 mercenaries declared their intention of deserting to the 
 French. Ludovico Sforza used the strongest entreaties 
 to dissuade them ; but finding them determined, he 
 merely begged not to be delivered to the enemy. How 
 was he to escape from Novara, in which he was in a 
 manner besieged ? The Swiss consented to allow him to 
 mingle in their ranks, clothed as one of their soldiers. 
 Their treachery, however, or the vigilance of the French, 
 discovered the unfortunate Ludovico in the Swiss ranks, 
 as they marched out of Novara. He was taken, and
 
 1501. TREATY WITH ARACON". 179 
 
 conveyed to France, where he was confined in the castle 
 of Chinon until he died. Thus Louis, having fortunately 
 made himself master of the person of his rival, subdued 
 for the second time the duchy of Milan. 
 
 The conquest of Naples still remained to be achieved ; 
 but the present enmity of Maximilian king of the Ro- 
 mans rendered it inexpedient to undertake at present so 
 distant an expedition, which would leave Milan exposed 
 to the hostility of the Germans. This inability to con- 
 quer, joined with the impatience to possess, caused Louis 
 to commit an egregious blunder. He formed an alliance 
 with Ferdinand king of Spain, to divide between them 
 the kingdom of Naples, to the exclusion of its reigning 
 monarch, who was of the illegitimate race of Aragon. 
 Louis was to have the better or northern half of the 
 kingdom, the city of Naples included. Ferdinand, who 
 merely wanted a pretext to obtain a footing in the Pen- 
 insula, and introduce forces, was to content himself with 
 Apulia and Calabria. Accordingly, Ferdinand sent 
 Gonsalvo de Cordova, and Louis despatched Stuart of 
 Aubigny, each to conquer their respective portions, which 
 they effected; the reigning monarch at first confiding to 
 Gonsalvo, who of course betrayed him. Frederick of 
 Naples, being driven from his capital and kingdom, fled 
 first to Ischia and thence to France, where Louis gave 
 him the duchy of Anjou as a compensation for the loss 
 of his crown. 
 
 Conquest is like gambling. The excitement of the 
 game being pleasure greater than even the possession of 
 the prize, the winner is ever driven to venture on a 
 fresh stake. Louis now turned his views towards the 
 Venetians. They had obtained Cremona, Bergami, 
 Brescia, the eastern territories of the duchy of Milan, as 
 the price of their co-operation against Sforza. The king 
 envied them this portion of his duchy, as they hated and 
 feared the newly grown power of a foreign monarch in 
 Italy. He endeavoured to bring Maximilian of Austria 
 to join in an alliance against them ; and a treaty was 
 concluded, by which Maximilian promised the investi- 
 N 2
 
 180 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1502. 
 
 tore of the duchy of Milan to Louis. Maximilian'* 
 grandson Charles (afterwards emperor) was to marry the 
 princess Claude, the daughter of Louis. The designs, 
 however, which the monarchs entertained against Venice 
 were interrupted by the bad faith of Ferdinand of Spain, 
 which began to manifest itself in Naples. The agree- 
 ment by which this kingdom was partitioned between 
 two rival powers, without any fixed line of demarcation, 
 was necessarily rather a source of war than a seal of 
 peace. A great portion of the country's revenue pro- 
 ceeded from the tax on the herds of cattle, which were 
 yearly collected in the plains. Quarrels arose about this, 
 and about the limits of the provinces ; and war soon 
 broke out between Gonsalvo and the duke de Nemours, 
 who was viceroy for the French. 
 
 Never was a prince more benevolent and wise in 
 his domestic and internal policy than Louis XI I.; yet 
 never was prince led astray by ambition to commit 
 greater blunders and injustice than he in his relations 
 with foreign princes. He was now leagued with the 
 Borgias the father, the execrable pope Alexander VI.; 
 his son Caesar Borgia, one of the heroes of Machiavel. 
 They betrayed Louis at every turn ; crushed and mur- 
 dered his friends. Still the French king temporised ; 
 and in a treaty concluded with them at this period, 
 he agreed to sacrifice to them several of the independ- 
 ent nobility of Italy among others, the Bentivoglios 
 and the Orsini. One of the causes of this blindness 
 in Louis was the care which the pope took to win the 
 favour of the cardinal of Amboise, the French minister, 
 whom he cajoled in a manner which was afterwards 
 practised on Wolsey, by flattering him with the hope 
 of succeeding to the popedom. The French were at first 
 the strongest party in Naples. Gonsalvo retired before 
 D'Aubigny, and shut himself in Barletta. There were 
 several combats : one, in which the brave La Palisse 
 was taken ; another, of thirteen French against thirteen 
 Italians, in which the Italians had the best, although 
 their enemies assert that the advantage was won by
 
 1503. NAPLES SURRENDERS. 181 
 
 treacherously stabbing the horses of the French knights. 
 The Spanish monarch had recourse to artifice, his usual 
 weapon. Seizing the opportunity of his son-in-law 
 the archduke Philip's travelling through France, he pro- 
 posed a new treaty to Louis, by which Naples was to be 
 brought as the princess Claude's dowry to young Charles, 
 the grandson of Charles and Maximilian. Louis XII., 
 who seemed as fond of negotiations and treaties as he 
 was certain to be duped in them, gladly and confidently 
 agreed to these proposals. He relaxed in his exertions 
 for reinforcing his army in Naples, while Ferdinand 
 made use of the interval to send potent succours to 
 Gonsalvo. The continued hostilities and successes of 
 this captain, notwithstanding the pacific declaration and 
 arrangement of his master, awakened Louis from his 
 supine confidence. But it was too late. D'Aubigny was 
 beaten by the Spaniards and taken prisoner at Seminara 
 in Calabria, the scene of one of his former victories. On 
 the same day of the ensuing week, the hostile com- 
 manders, Gonsalvo and the duke de Nemours, met at 
 Cirignola. It was towards evening, and the Spaniards 
 threw up an entrenchment before their position. The 
 duke de Nemours would not tarry. He ordered an in- 
 stant attack, which was at first successful. He himself, 
 leading on another to support it, was slain by a bullet 
 from an arquebuss ; and his followers failing in the 
 assault, a rout ensued, in which the French army were 
 for the most part dispersed. Naples surrendered to 
 Gonsalvo. Its castle was taken by mining, a mode of 
 offence invented in these wars. Shortly afterwards, the 
 fortress of Gaeta was the only post in the kingdom that 
 held for the French. 
 
 Louis was exasperated to the utmost. He raised 
 armies to attack Ferdinand in the Pyrenees and in Italy; 
 but equally without a result. La Tremouille, the French 
 general, fell ill, and Gonzaga marquis of Mantua, who 
 took the command, from want of either zeal or talent 
 did nothing. The army, too, was delayed near Rome 
 by the intrigues of the pope, and the unwillingness of 
 N 3
 
 182 HISTOttV OF FRANCE. 1504. 
 
 the cardinal of Amboise to break with him. The reign 
 of the Borgias was immediately after brought to a tra- 
 gical close. The pope and his son had invited several 
 rich cardinals, their intimates, to sup with them in a 
 vineyard. The Borgias intended to poison them ; and 
 Caesar Borgia sent some bottles of medicated wine, under 
 the especial care of a domestic, to the spot. The pope 
 arrived first ; he was thirsty, and called for drink. The 
 poisoned wine was poured out for him ; and his son, 
 coming in at the moment, partook of it. Pope Alexan- 
 der expired soon after, and his son's life was saved only 
 by means of antidotes and a strong constitution. Great 
 intrigues agitated the conclave. An aged and infirm 
 pope was elected by way of compromise. In another 
 conclave the cardinal of Amboise was not more success- 
 ful. An Italian prelate was preferred, who soon dis- 
 played his imperious, ambitious, and warlike spirit, under 
 the name of Julius II. Cssar Borgia had contributed 
 to his election, in return for a promise of protection ; 
 and Julius showed his gratitude by arresting Borgia 
 immediately afterwards. He escaped, however, and fled 
 to Gonsalvo, who, receiving him with friendship equally 
 insincere, put an end to the career of this prince of in- 
 trigue by sending him prisoner to Spain. In the mean 
 time the French army remained inactive for want of a 
 chief. Gonzaga had been driven from the command by 
 the taunts of the French : the marquis of Saluces suc- 
 ceeded him, but with no more success. The campaign 
 served but to display the valour of the brave Bayard, 
 who alone defended the passage of a bridge against a 
 body of Spaniards for a considerable time. Gonsalvo 
 was every where successful ; and Gaeta, the last fortress 
 of the French, surrendered in a panic. 
 
 The tidings of this ill-fortune, and especially of the 
 loss of Gaeta, so affected Louis that he fell into a dan- 
 gerous illness. He was tended with exemplary affection 
 by his queen, Anne of Britany. But that prudent 
 princess, seeing his death imminent, despatched much of 
 her valuables to be conveyed down the Loire to Britany.
 
 1504. ILLNESS OP LOUIS. 183 
 
 The heir to the crown, young Francis count of Angou- 
 leme, then inhabited, with his mother, the chateau of 
 Amboise. The marshal de Gie was the chief counsellor 
 and influential man of this embryo court. Over-zealous 
 for the interests of the future king, and deeming Louis 
 past hope, de Gie stopped the valuables of the queen as 
 they descended the Loire past Amboise. Anne never 
 forgave the insult. Louis recovered, and the marshal de 
 Gie was pursued by the vengeance of the queen for years. 
 He was tried ; and it is a great proof of the improve- 
 ment of the judicature, that he escaped with life from 
 so powerful an enemy. This circumstance increased 
 the hatred between the mother of Francis, Louisa of 
 Savoy, and queen Anne. By the last treaty with Maxi- 
 milian it had been agreed that his grandson Charles 
 should marry Claude, the daughter of Louis, and with 
 her inherit the Milanese. Some time previous to the 
 last illness of the king, Maximilian had sent an embassy 
 to conclude and enlarge this treaty. The monarch was 
 at the time sorely vexed by his disasters in Naples, and 
 greatly enraged against the fickleness and bad faith of 
 the Italian powers. Above all he was incensed against 
 Venice ; and in order to be avenged on this proud re- 
 public, he granted to Maximilian all that he asked. The 
 cessions then made or stipulated by Louis are so enor- 
 mous as to be incredible. The heirs of his daughter 
 Claude by Charles of Luxembourg were to possess not 
 only Milan, but the duchies of Burgundy and Britany, 
 which thus dismember the monarchy of France, and 
 reduce it almost by one half. De Seyssel, the minister 
 and biographer of Louis, excuses his conduct on this 
 occasion, by saying that the king merely wanted to gain 
 Maximilian's aid against the Venetians, and that he 
 never intended to fulfil these conditions. I do not credit 
 this would-be exculpation, which sacrifices the king's 
 good faith to his patriotism. It seems much more pro- 
 bable that these stipulations were owing to the influence 
 of Anne of Britany ; to the love of that queen for her 
 own daughter, whose exaltation she preferred to that of 
 N 4
 
 184 HISTORY OF FBANCE. 1506. 
 
 France; and at the same time to Anne's hatred of Louisa 
 of Savoy, and of her son Francis, the heir to the throne. 
 Every Frenchman was shocked and terrified at the pro- 
 spect of these provinces being conveyed to a foreign 
 power. Louis himself, listening to the voice of his 
 counsellors, was struck with remorse at the folly and 
 want of patriotism which characterised such measures. 
 The states-general were called together : they drew up 
 a strong remonstrance against them, and supplicated that 
 the princess Claude should be given in marriage to 
 Francis. The king consented to this. But so long as 
 Anne of Britany lived, she never allowed the marriage 
 to take place. 
 
 Maximih'an was of course extremely wroth on learn- 
 ing that the king of France and the assembly of the 
 nation refused to fulfil the treaty. He resolved to 
 attack the French in Italy. Genoa about this time had 
 rebelled against Louis. The Genoese had for very many 
 years been oscillating between freedom and a state of 
 dependance on France. Equally intolerant of either 
 condition, they changed from one to the other, and 
 knew no repose. Louis, however, conquered and re- 
 duced them to submission. Maximih'an was too late to 
 support their insurrection. The Venetians, then allies 
 of the king, barred the passage of the Austrians into 
 Italy. They defeated Maximih'an, and compelled him 
 to purchase a treaty, resigning his conquests. They 
 concluded it without awaiting the consent of Louis, or 
 allowing him to derive from it any advantage. 
 
 This was a new grievance added to the many already 
 entertained against these republicans by the French. 
 Maximilian was of course ready to join against them. 
 Pope Julius was at variance with them on account of 
 Faenza, and other towns, the wreck of the Borgian 
 usurpations, which they held. Between these powers 
 and Ferdinand of Spain was formed the famous league 
 of Cambray for the destruction of Venice. It was called 
 famous from having nearly attained its aim, a distinc- 
 tion which could be applied to few treaties of the time.
 
 1509. DEFEAT OF THE VENETIANS. 185 
 
 In raising his army for this enterprise the king made 
 an important improvement in his levies. He began to 
 mistrust the Swiss, whose mercenary and turbulent spirit 
 was scarcely recompensed by their character for courage. 
 Therefore, although he hired a corps of them to the 
 number of 6000, he at the same time endeavoured to 
 resuscitate the French infantry. Louis XI. had aban- 
 doned the good custom of training the French peasants 
 to arms, which had so contributed to the victories of 
 Charles VII. The despot dreaded a national army. The 
 armiesof Charles VIII., and hitherto those of Louis XII., 
 were composed of mounted gentlemen, who formed the 
 cavalry, and of hired Swiss, or perhaps a few Gascons, 
 for infantry. This was the principal reason of the first 
 success and subsequent defeats of the French in Naples. 
 Cavalry force, so superior when in good condition, is 
 liable to be unhorsed, and is more easily disorganised 
 than infantry. Louis now levied a body of infantry 
 in France of from 12,000 to 14,000 men. To give 
 spirit and respectability to this force, he induced his 
 bravest captains, Bayard, Molard, and Chabannes, to 
 fight on foot and command these new brigades ; and 
 it required all his influence to make them submit to such 
 degradation. The French cavalry amounted to 12,000 
 men. With this army he marched against the Venetians. 
 Their army, no wise inferior, was commanded by the 
 count de Petilliana, whose policy accorded with the 
 orders of the senate to avoid a battle. Alviana, the 
 Venetian general second in command, risked an attack 
 in despite of this at Agnadel. An action took place, in 
 which the count feebly supported his lieutenant. Louis, 
 who fought in the thickest of the engagement, was vic- 
 torious. The Venetian army was utterly routed ; and 
 the French king, advancing to the brink of the Lagunes, 
 enjoyed the satisfaction of sending from his cannon 
 some vain shots against the discomfited but still un- 
 subdued queen of the Adriatic. 
 
 This success dissolved the league. The fickle Maxi- 
 milian found some other phantom to pursue. He wished
 
 186 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1511. 
 
 to become pope. Julius II., having obtained possession 
 of the towns which he coveted from the Venetians, 
 leagued with them against Louis ; and a war, or a suc- 
 cession of skirmishes, ensued between the French and 
 him, which is amusing by the scruples of the French 
 generals, who feared to make the most of their advan- 
 tages. It is singular how much more free from idle 
 superstition the middling orders were than the higher. 
 The king, the queen, and even the gallant knights Bay- 
 ard and de Chaumont, shrunk from warring against 
 the sovereign pontiff. The states-general, the commons 
 of France, on the contrary, urged the war, and de- 
 clared that Julius, who himself wielded the sword, 
 might be made to suffer from it. Louis, in consequence, 
 sent a powerful army against the pope, under the com- 
 mand of Gaston de Foix duke of Nemours, his sister's 
 son, then twenty-two years of age. Gaston showed 
 himself worthy to command. His army, upwards of 
 20,000 strong, counted in its ranks 5000 lansquenets 
 in Maximilian's service. That prince wrote to them to 
 retire. Gaston intercepted and destroyed the letter, and 
 without loss of time laid siege to Ravenna, in order to 
 induce the enemy to risk an engagement for its relief. 
 His artifice succeeded. The troops of the pope, the 
 Venetians, and the king of Spain, marched towards Ra- 
 venna, and Gaston faced about to meet them. The 
 battle of Ravenna ensued, the most serious that had 
 been fought for many years. The two armies con- 
 fronted each other on the 1 1th of May. The Spaniards 
 being entrenched, Gaston hesitated to attack, and the 
 action began with firing and cannonade. When it had 
 lasted some hours, Fabricio Colonna, who commanded 
 the papal troops, weary of seeing them mowed down 
 without striking a blow, rushed over the entrenchment 
 to charge the French : Bayard, Gaston, and his com- 
 panions, withstood the attack, and after half an hour's 
 combat the Italians were put to the rout. The Spaniards, 
 however, under Peter of Navarre, held their ground. 
 They consisted chiefly of infantry, being but 400 horse
 
 1512. BATTLE OP RAVENNA. 187 
 
 to 4000 foot. Ferdinand, in his Moorish wars, had 
 imitated Charles VII.'s wise policy in arming the pea- 
 sants and creating a national infantry. In the pre- 
 sent action the Spaniards had suffered little; being 
 entrenched, they had lain down during the cannonade, 
 and had, with ease, repulsed the lansquenets. Even 
 now, when deserted by their allies, they retreated step 
 by step, showing a bold front to their enemies. Gaston 
 de Foix, elated with his victory, was enraged to see the 
 Spaniards escape unbroken. Gathering in haste a few 
 cavaliers, the young general himself charged furiously 
 iipon the retreating phalanx to break it. The hero met 
 his death, being pierced with fourteen pike-wounds. 
 Yves d'Alegre, another celebrated French captain, pe- 
 rished with him ; and Lautrec, afterwards so famous, 
 lay pierced with a number of wounds. The French, 
 nevertheless, were victorious. The two generals, Peter 
 of Navarre and Fabricio Colonna, were prisoners ; and 
 we also mark in the list the marquis of Pescara and 
 the cardinal de' Medici, soon after Leo X. 
 
 The sack of Ravenna was almost the only fruit 
 reaped by this signal victory. Julius II., undaunted by 
 defeat, refused to yield. He raised up the English 
 and the Swiss against Louis, who was threatened with 
 invasion from both these countries. Maximilian let 
 loose upon Milan his namesake Maximilian Sforza, son 
 of Ludovico ; and the Swiss espoused the youth's pre- 
 tensions. The cantons were enraged against Louis for 
 attempting to substitute French soldiers for them. When 
 he sent La Tremouille to negotiate with them, they de- 
 manded that 15,000 Swiss should be yearly hired, and 
 paid by France in peace and war. They demanded 
 also the Milanese for Sforza, and the abolition of the 
 pragmatic sanction for the pope. It is said, they also 
 resented some injurious words spoken by Louis. What- 
 ever was its cause, their resentment was but too well 
 seconded by their force. The French under La Palisse 
 and Trivulzio were driven out of the Milanese, and even 
 Genoa again declared itself independent. The feats of
 
 188 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1513. 
 
 Bayard during this unfortunate campaign might be 
 made to fill pages, but they availed nothing. Navarre 
 was at the same time wrested by Ferdinand from Jean 
 d'Albret. Although the king of France still bears 
 the title, the province has ever since remained to the 
 Spaniards. 
 
 The death of Julius II. occurred about this time, to 
 give some respite to Louis. His successor, Leo X., was 
 not unfriendly to France, The enmity between Louis 
 and Ferdinand burned less fierce, and a truce was agreed 
 on. The king's darling object was the Milanese, which 
 he had twice lost ; his efforts were now exerted to re- 
 cover it for the third time. An army marched thither 
 under La Tremouille and Trivulzio ; and the Milanese, 
 as usual, submitted to the superior force. Sforza shut 
 himself up with 6000 Swiss in Novara, and was soon 
 besieged there. Those mountaineers were actuated by 
 implacable hatred against the French : they sallied forth 
 before daybreak from Novara, to surprise the invaders 
 in their camp ; it was defended by a formidable park 
 of artillery, which did great execution in their dense 
 ranks, until, with undaunted perseverance, they carried 
 the entrenchments and turned the guns on the French. 
 The cavalry escaped ; but all the infantry, the body most 
 odious to the Swiss, perished. The veteran La Tre- 
 mouille lost a leg. Thus once more did the fabric 
 of French conquests in Italy fall in ruins to the 
 ground. Louis had no longer spirits to return to the 
 charge ; nor, if he had, would his enemies have allowed 
 him leisure. Henry VIII. of England had invaded 
 France in concert with Maximilian. He laid siege to 
 Terouenne. The French succeeded in throwing supplies 
 into the town ; but being attacked suddenly some days 
 after by the English and imperialists, they were seized 
 with a panic and fled. This has been called the battle 
 of Spurs. Bayard, who refused to join in the flight of 
 his compatriots, was made prisoner after a gallant de- 
 fence. Terouenne was the sole conquest of Henry. 
 The Swiss at the same time had burst into Burgundy :
 
 1514. DEATH OP THE QUEEV. 189 
 
 La Tremouille had no forces to oppose them, and he 
 was soon besieged in Dijon. He offered to treat; and 
 they demanded the most exorbitant conditions. In the 
 present distressed state of the monarchy, La Tremouille 
 thought deceit warrantable : he promised the Swiss all 
 their demands, aware that the king would afterwards 
 disavow them ; and at the same time offered a large 
 sum, at which the Swiss greedily caught, and decamped 
 to their mountains. Never did a more fearful storm 
 menace France ; happily, however, it blew over. For- 
 tunately too for Europe, at that time when ambition 
 reigned uncontrolled by any maxim of either justice or 
 prudence, the means of warlike defence were so much 
 superior to those of offence, that conquests were never 
 permanent, unless where they were salutary and natural 
 extensions of territory or empire. 
 
 In January, 1514, Louis lost his queen, Anne of 
 Britany, to whom he was tenderly attached. She was 
 a woman of distinguished beauty, though she limped in 
 her gait. She possessed great influence over Louis ; was 
 proud, independent, and obstinate, qualities character- 
 istic of the Bretons. Anne was at the same time a 
 pious, chaste, and exemplary queen. It was through 
 her influence and importance that the female sex, 
 hitherto excluded, were introduced into society : she 
 formed a court, and collected around her the principal 
 young ladies of rank in the kingdom, whose manners 
 and principles she loved to form. Unfortunately, the 
 successor of Louis saw in this collection of beauty but a 
 prey for his licentiousness ; and Francis thus speedily 
 corrupted an institution intended by its virtuous pa- 
 troness to purify as well as adorn society. The esta- 
 blishment of a court, that is, of a court in which woman's 
 presence was allowed and her influence felt, was, trifling 
 as it may seem, the most important innovation of the 
 age. 
 
 Louis, attached as he had been to Anne, did not long 
 delay to fill up the place by her left vacant. Policy 
 joined with other reasons to prompt this step. As the
 
 190 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1515. 
 
 seal of a reconciliation and alliance with Henry VIII., 
 Louis espoused that monarch's sister Mary, a princess 
 then in the flower of her age. The gay habits of a 
 bridegroom did not suit the constitution of the king, 
 then turned of fifty-four. In a few weeks after his 
 marriage he was seized with a fever and dysentery, 
 which carried him off at the palace of the Tournelles, in 
 Paris, on the first day of the year 1515. 
 
 Never was monarch more lamented by the great mass 
 of his subjects than Louis XII. He was endeared to 
 them principally by his economy and forbearance in levy- 
 ing contributions, and by his strict administration of jus- 
 tice, so different from the sanguinary executions which 
 characterised the reign of Louis XL, when no man 
 could be certain of life. He reduced the taxes more 
 than one third in the early part of his reign, and even 
 in his distresses preferred selling the crown lands to any 
 of the usual expedients for exaction.* Hence Louis 
 earned the appellation of Father of his people. His 
 popularity was much greater with the middling than 
 with the higher classes. The latter called his economy 
 parsimony, and his sympathy with the commons forget- 
 fulness of his rank. Writers of the reigns of Louis XIV. 
 and XV. seek to depreciate the character of Louis XII. 
 and to elevate that of his successor. Louis XII. they 
 consider as the roi roturier, the plebeian king ; Francis 
 as the aristocratic and chevaleresque. The nobility cer- 
 tainly do not appear prominent in this reign. New 
 names arise and become illustrious as in the time of 
 Charles VII. The lesser noblesse or gentry were in 
 fact treading on the heels and taking the places of the 
 higher aristocracy. The latter rallied or were re-created 
 
 * The imposts on the accession of Francis I. were as follows : 
 
 1. The tail/,; amounting to 1,075,000 livres. 
 
 2. ThegabeUe, being one fifth of the value of salt superadded to it 
 
 3. The aides, a tax (of Spanish origin) on the sale of wine, wood, fish 
 and meat. This was a sou per livre, or one twentieth on the gross sale, 
 and one third in addition on the retail. 
 
 Francis increased the gabelle hy one half; the tattle was also augmented. 
 " His levying of the aides," says Rcederer, " destroyed the vineyards of 
 France for two centuries, and was one of the causes of the revolution of 
 1798." We should add to this the sale of offices by Francis, a lucrative 
 source of revenue to him.
 
 CHARACTER OF LOUIS XII. 1 .<)! 
 
 in the days of Francis, but these tendencies were as 
 much the effect of opposite states and circumstances, as 
 of the opposite characters of the two monarchs. 
 
 The writers of the Revolution reverse the system of 
 favouritism : they choose Louis, the father of his peo- 
 ple, to be their hero, and they depreciate the kingly 
 Francis. A living author of this school, Rcederer, has 
 seen every perfection in Louis XII., and he considers 
 that the commons of France were in possession of per- 
 fect constitutional freedom during his reign : history, 
 however, does not present this view of the question. 
 Although Louis did certainly seem to allow in the par- 
 liament a power of examining and objecting to his 
 edicts, yet the assembly of states in his reign was far 
 from assuming or being allowed aught like a consti- 
 tutional control. The very virtues and moderation of 
 Louis were inimical to political freedom, since, by ren- 
 dering the commons contented, they took from them, with 
 the wish, the right of remonstrance. Had a prodigal 
 and an unpopular king been reduced to the same distress 
 as Louis was in the latter years of his reign, the com- 
 mons of France might opportunely have made a stand 
 for their privileges, and at least kept alive their tradi- 
 tions of freedom ; but nothing that took place during 
 this reign can induce us to retract the opinion, that in 
 the period of Charles the Wise and of John, French 
 constitutional freedom had reached its zenith, from 
 whence it declined and sank, until every ray was lost in 
 the night of despotism.
 
 192 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 CHAP. VI. 
 
 15151547. 
 
 FRANCIS THE FIRST. 
 
 WE have hitherto traversed the early centuries of French 
 history with a hurried step, our pages necessarily from 
 their brevity affording more information than interest. 
 Yet, as the remote ages of a foreign country must occupy 
 but a limited space in our memory, we have perhaps 
 not been too brief for Englishmen. To follow closely 
 the progress of those political institutions, fortunately 
 not our own, which were doomed to perish and merge 
 in mere despotism, would have been an ungrateful and 
 a needless task ; while to give a lively picture of chival- 
 rous personages and times would have required the 
 space and leisure, with the simplicity and detail, of the 
 ancient chroniclers. The idlest student too may give 
 an hour to Froissart, whilst few there are who can de- 
 vote time and thought to the study of Guicciardini and 
 De Thou. 
 
 For this reason greater space has been assigned to 
 the period we now enter upon. It may be called the 
 frontier line of modern history : it is the horizon 
 which bounds our historical view ; all within it stretch- 
 ing in continuance up to the very present, separated only 
 by three centuries, an interval which, however great it 
 may seem to us, is in reality no very extended portion 
 of time. To this epoch may be traced the different 
 political systems and fortunes of the European states. 
 They had then, each of them, attained their national 
 limits. Nations, like men, when they arrive at ma- 
 turity of growth, seek to exert their force externally. 
 To encroach upon, to conquer, to reduce their neighbours, 
 is the natural impulse of the many as of the few. 
 Laws and civilisation have restrained the frowardness of 
 man : it is to be hoped that a still greater degree of 
 enlightenment may yet equally tame the envious and
 
 1515. ACCESSION OF FRANCIS i. 193 
 
 ambitious spirit of nations ; and that man in the ag- 
 gregate may at length be taught the moral wisdom and 
 forbearance which have been forced upon the individual. 
 
 At that time aggrandisement was the only aim that 
 policy could propose to itself. Unfortunately the same 
 maxim, however refuted, is far from being exploded; 
 although the great lesson of modern history is the hope- 
 lessness of pushing conquests beyond geographical limits. 
 What quantities of blood were spilt in vain attempts of 
 English kings to seize part of France ; in the efforts of 
 French princes to hold portions of Italy ! If it was the 
 mad policy of one nation to conquer, it became that of 
 the other to defend, and of the third to interfere in 
 favour of the weakest. Hence the great principle of 
 the balance of power, first acted upon by the Italian 
 states, and from them extending, in this period, until 
 it became the policy of Europe. It began to be under- 
 stood and to prevail at the very time when monarchs, 
 growing universally despotic, and wielding the mature 
 powers and resources of their kingdoms, felt themselves 
 naturally inclined and urged to conquest. This great 
 principle neutralised their efforts ; and by rendering 
 universal dominion impracticable, completed the final 
 demarcation between ancient and modern times. 
 
 Francis I. ascended the throne at the age of twenty- 
 one : he was tall, handsome, robust. Reared in retire- 
 ment at Amboise under the care of his mother, Louisa 
 of Savoy, a gallant dame, he. received the education of 
 a knight rather than that of a monarch. While young 
 Charles, his future rival, was made to study history and 
 political science under an active statesman, Francis 
 was merely taught the accomplishments of chivalry, 
 garnished with such lighter studies as romance and 
 rhyming story, and the feats of classic heroes told in 
 modern fashion. He thus ascended the throne with no 
 more solid principles than a love of pleasure and of 
 glory. Francis was, however, of a kind and friendly 
 nature. For his mother he ever entertained the most 
 obsequious regard ; and his piety in this respect was 
 
 VOL. I. O
 
 194 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1515. 
 
 unfortunate : it was her influence that displayed itself 
 in the first appointments of the new reign. Duprat was 
 made chancellor ; and the duke of Bourbon, a young 
 man of handsome person but austere manners, was no- 
 minated constable. An agreeable exterior was equally 
 the passport to the favour of Francis and to that of his 
 mother. Bonnivet, the future favourite and admiral, 
 was the handsomest man of his time. The family of 
 Foix were equally distinguished for personal attractions : 
 the three brothers, one of whom was Lautrec, were ad- 
 vanced to the command of armies, and their sister be- 
 came the mistress of the young monarch. 
 
 It is singular, that almost the first political act of 
 both Francis and of Charles, then but count of Flanders, 
 was to enter into a mutual treaty: Charles promised to 
 restore Navarre when he should succeed to the throne 
 of Spain ; which succession Francis, on the other hand, 
 guarantied to him. Charles was so gratified by the 
 conduct of his ambassador, Henry of Nassau, upon this 
 account, that he asked and obtained for him from Francis 
 the hand of Claude de Chalon, sister of Philibert prince 
 of Orange. It was this marriage that transported the 
 title and estates of Orange to the house of Nassau. 
 
 The first thought that naturally occurred to a young 
 monarch like Francis was to reconquer the Milanese, 
 and avenge the defeat of his predecessor. Alliances 
 were the first consideration, and the French ministers 
 used every art to lessen the number of their enemies. 
 The projects of invading Italy were kept a profound 
 secret, and the fears of the Italian princes were allayed 
 by the peaceable declarations of the French envoys. The 
 learned Budaeus was the ambassador sent by Francis to 
 pope Leo on tin's occasion. The Swiss, enraged at the 
 nonperformance of the stipulations accepted at Dijon 
 by La Tremouille, threatened France with an invasion. 
 Francis grasped at the pretext to raise and assemble an 
 army in Burgundy. This alarmed Ferdinand of Spain, 
 as well as Maximilian of Austria, and his namesake 
 Sforza, then in possession of Milan. The revolt of
 
 1515. All MY ASSEMBLED AT LYONS. 195 
 
 Genoa to the French at the same time betrayed their 
 views upon Italy. And the Swiss accordingly, instead 
 of invading Burgundy, poured down into Piedmont, and 
 occupied all the known passes of the Alps. 
 
 In raising funds for the equipment of his army, 
 Francis already displayed his reckless and imperious 
 character. He shrunk from assembling the states, 
 which had usually been the first act of a new reign. 
 At the same time he feared to commence by the un- 
 popular measure of augmenting the faille. As an 
 expedient, Duprat proposed to render the offices of the 
 judicature venal. A new chamber of twenty counsel- 
 lors was created, and the seats were put up to auction. 
 There had been previous instances of principal offices 
 being purchased, but Francis was the first king that 
 appointed judges in parliament for money. Strange it 
 is, that a corruption so gross and so revolting had an 
 effect rather beneficial. It increased the independence 
 of French judges, and gave them politically much 
 greater weight than they had before possessed ; while 
 sentiments of honour, traditionally cherished and ob- 
 served by the great families of the robe, enforced of 
 course with a due reverence for public opinion, proved 
 sufficient to keep the source of justice pure even purer, 
 perhaps, than in countries where the Domination de- 
 pended oii the royal will. 
 
 The army now assembled by Francis at Lyons was 
 estimated at 60,000 men, the most formidable in num- 
 ber that France had yet equipped. There were 2500 
 gentlemen cavaliers, each attended by his suite of four 
 or five horsemen. These were the Gcnsdarmerie. The 
 lansquenets, or hired German infantry, amounted to 
 22,000. Six thousand Gascon infantry, as many more 
 French promiscuously levied, and 3000 pioneers, com- 
 pleted the army. The rear-guard advanced under the 
 constable Bourbon to clear the passage of the Alps, and 
 to force the Swiss from the post of Susa, which blocked 
 up the only two known roads across the mountains. To 
 find or make another path became necessary, in order
 
 196 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1515. 
 
 to turn the impregnable position ; and fortunately a 
 guide undertook to lead the French over the Cottian 
 Alps into the marquisate of Saluces. Even for the 
 army to pass was a work of difficulty, but their artillery 
 was what the French captains chiefly relied on to dis- 
 comfit the Swiss. To drag cannons over deep valleys 
 and precipitous steeps was more than Hannibal had 
 achieved, and was afterwards one of the principal boasts 
 of the army that conquered at Marengo. The soldiers 
 of France accomplished the task, however, and pene- 
 trated into Italy by the sources of the Po. The Italians 
 did not suspect the possibility of so hardy an enterprise. 
 Prospero Colonna was traversing Piedmont at the head 
 of the papal cavalry to join the Swiss, and was reposing 
 at Villefranche, when the town was surprised, and Colonna 
 himself, and his troops, taken prisoners by La Palisse 
 and d'Aubigny. The news of this surprise soon 
 reached the Swiss, and they abandoned in a rage their 
 now useless position, retreating to Milan, and pillaging 
 the towns they were obligetl to evacuate. Their disap- 
 pointment produced quarrels between the chiefs. The 
 cardinal of Sion reproached one of the captains of Berne 
 with partiality to the French. The captain and his 
 soldiers, by way of retort, demanded their pay ; and the 
 cardinal, the sworn enemy of France, was obliged to 
 fly from their clamours. 
 
 This opened the way for negotiation. The king, 
 with the rest of his army, had in the mean time crossed 
 the Alps, and lay encamped at Marignano. The prow- 
 ess of the Swiss was dreaded, and the terrific day of 
 Novara was held in remembrance. Consequently, 
 when they demanded a large sum of money for them- 
 selves, and a pension for Maximilian Sforza, in return 
 for evacuating the Milanese, the terms were granted. 
 Francis raised the money instantly by borrowing of his 
 officers ; and envoys were already despatched with the 
 stipulated sum, when tidings were brought to the con- 
 stable, that the Swiss, in lieu of concluding a treaty, 
 were meditating an attack. The cardinal of Sion had,
 
 1515. BATTLE OF MARIGNANO. 197 
 
 in fact, hurried back to Milan on the first news of the 
 accommodation. lie called his countrymen round him, 
 harangued them, and rekindled that hatred to the French 
 for which history assigns no sufficient cause. 
 
 The Swiss determined to surprise the French, to 
 carry the artillery in the first attack, and turn it on 
 their enemies, an operation so successful at Novara. Bour- 
 bon, however, was prepared for them. The artillery, 
 consisting of seventy pieces, were placed behind an en- 
 trenchment, commanding the road ; the lansquenets 
 were stationed to guard it, while the cavalry, drawn up 
 behind, and on each side, waited to observe the order 
 of the Swiss. They came on in silence, without drum 
 or tnimpet ; a cloud of dust, raised by their speed, an- 
 nouncing, nevertheless, their approach. It was the 
 middle of September, several hours after noon. The 
 Swiss came in one compact column, rushing on the artil- 
 lery, and against the lansquenets, those rivals in their 
 mercenary profession of war, whom they hated, and 
 whom they swore that day to exterminate. At first 
 the lansquenets recoiled from the furious charge of the 
 Swiss : some of the cannon were already captured ; when 
 the cavalry and the black bands, the king himself amongst 
 them, extended in the form of wings, and took the pha- 
 lanx of the Swiss on either side in flank. The lans- 
 quenets, thus supported, took courage. The first charge 
 of the Swiss, so universally victorious, was here not de- 
 cidedly successful, and having no longer the advantage 
 of an impulse, their pikes became less formidable. Obliged 
 to face enemies that almost surrounded them, their pha- 
 lanx was split into numerous bodies, which continued the 
 combat, not only till sunset, but even till the moonlight 
 failed them. Some of these bodies succumbed, however: 
 one yielded to a charge led by the king himself; the 
 Swiss throwing down their halberds, and crying " France ! " 
 in token of submission. Towards midnight, utter dark- 
 ness stopped the combat, and both parties, intermingled, 
 slept or kept watch in little bands amongst their ene- 
 o 3
 
 198 HISTORY OF FR.AXCE. 1515. 
 
 mies. The king himself reposed on the stock of a 
 cannon. 
 
 When day broke, both armies rallied; the Swiss to 
 form their original phalanx ; the French round their can- 
 non, which were again plied with true aim and fearful 
 alacrity. The Swiss renewed the attack. The lans- 
 quenets still held the entrenchment ; the rest of the 
 army assailed the enemy in flank. After some hours' 
 fighting, the Swiss began to despair. They now con- 
 descended to manoeuvre, and despatched a consider- 
 able body to turn and attack the French camp in rear : 
 but it was too late ; the division was beaten back, and 
 naught was left for the Swiss but to retreat. This they 
 did in good order and undaunted ; though pursued not 
 only by the victorious French, but by the Venetians, 
 who arrived at the close of the action. The count de 
 Petigliana, the Venetian general, desirous to share in tht 
 combat, charged the retreating Swiss, and perished. 
 
 Thus did the young monarch signalise the very com- 
 mencement of his reign by a splendid victory gained 
 over the most renowned soldiers in Europe, and those 
 whom the French had most to fear. The veteran Tri- 
 vulzio, who had seen seventeen pitched battles, called all 
 of them " child's play," in comparison with that of 
 Marignano, which he designated as the " battle of 
 giants." Yet it is more remarkable for the glory won, 
 than for the blood spilled in it. Trivulzio, the king, the 
 constable Bourbon, the duke of Lorraine, and Bayard, 
 were all wounded or unhorsed, or in imminent peril. 
 He who most distinguished himself was Claude count 
 de Guise, brother of the duke of Lorraine : he com- 
 manded the black bands, and had fallen, pierced by in- 
 numerable wounds ; from which he nevertheless recovered, 
 and lived to found an illustrious name. The principal 
 of the slain were, a prince of the house of Lorraine, one 
 of the house of Bourbon, and the prince of Talmont, 
 elder son of La Tremouille. One of the first acts of 
 the king, after the action, was to receive knighthood 
 from the hand of Bayard, " the chevalier without fear
 
 1515. CONCORDAT. 199 
 
 and without reproach." Sensible of the honour done 
 to him by the choice, Bayard vowed that the sword 
 which had knighted so valiant a monarch should never 
 be wielded except against the infidels. " When he had 
 uttered this vow," quoth his secretary, who was his his- 
 torian, "he took two leaps, and returned the sword to 
 its scabbard." 
 
 The duchy of Milan was conquered by the victory of 
 Marignano. The Swiss, who held the fortress of the 
 capital, surrendered it, being hard pressed by the armies 
 of Peter of Navarre, which were now in the service of 
 the French king. Maximilian Sforza abandoned his 
 rights in return for a pension of 30,000 crowns, which 
 he was to enjoy in France, " no wise discontented," he 
 said, " to be delivered from the tyranny of the Swiss, 
 the caprices of the einperor, and the bad faith of the 
 Spaniards." It now behoved pope Leo to make sub- 
 mission. He had long temporised, and ill concealed his 
 adherence to that patriotic policy which was averse to 
 the establishment of any ultramontane power in Italy. 
 The pope sought an interview with the young monarch, 
 hoping to repair by address the weakness of his po- 
 sition ; nor did he fail. The king and the pontiff met 
 at Bologna. Francis was inexorable as to the fortresses 
 and territorial possessions : the pope was obliged to 
 give up Parma and Placentia, of which Julius II. had 
 taken possession after the battle of Ravenna. On other 
 points Francis was not averse to the wishes of Leo : he 
 agreed to protect the influence of the Medicis in Flo- 
 rence; the sovereignty of a family being far more agree- 
 able to the king's ideas than democratic freedom. But 
 it was chiefly in procuring the repeal of the pragmatic 
 sanction, that bulwark of the rights of the Gallican 
 church, that Leo showed his sagacity. This law, which 
 secured the appointment of French prelates by free elec- 
 tion, was superseded by an agreement, called the Con- 
 cordat, which conveyed the right of nominating prelates 
 to the king, who in return conceded the annates, or 
 first year's revenue, to the pope. Both sovereigns gained 
 o 4>
 
 200 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1518. 
 
 by this transaction, at the expense of the nation the 
 pope, a revenue of which he stood much in need; the 
 king, the means of gratifying and providing for the 
 younger members of the nobility. 
 
 Here we may pause to remark that the old aristo- 
 cracy had almost disappeared ; not only the sovereign 
 or ducal families, but the great territorial noblesse. And 
 this was owing, in a great measure, to the necessity of 
 either dividing the family possessions amongst many 
 brothers, the younger having no professional resource 
 but the honourable rather than lucrative profession of 
 arms; or else to the provident care, arising from the 
 same motives, of not rearing a numerous family of noble 
 rank. The court and favouritism of Francis created a 
 new noblesse, which fortunately his wars distinguished; 
 whilst his policy, reserving to them the benefices and 
 prelacies of the church, hitherto open to the democracy, 
 gave encouragement to the production and perpetuation of 
 noble families, which soon caused a great and pernicious 
 excess. The policy of Francis, however, in abrogat- 
 ing the pragmatic sanction, was not so far-sighted. The 
 popes had been long hostile to France on this account : 
 they were of the first influence, not only in Italy, but 
 with the Swiss. To win over the pope to his side, and 
 secure so potent an ally in support of his designs upon 
 Italy, was the chief aim of the king. The parliament, 
 however, made an obstinate resistance : they refused to 
 register the concordat. The king sent the Bastard of 
 Savoy, his uncle, to expostulate and menace. They 
 would not consult in his presence: they sent a deputa- 
 tion to Francis, who was then at Nampont. He made 
 them an angry reply, " I am king, as well as my pre- 
 decessors," said he, " and will be obeyed, as they were. 
 You are incessantly vaunting to me Louis XII., and 
 his love of justice; know that I love justice as much as 
 he. That monarch, so exemplarily just, drove those 
 who rebelled against him out of the kingdom, though 
 they were members of the parliament : oblige me not to 
 do the same." The king insisted that they should de-
 
 1518. RESISTANCE OF THE PARLIAMENT 201 
 
 liberate in the presence of the Bastard of Savoy. They 
 obeyed : but it was to come to the conclusion, that they 
 would not register the concordat ; and they appealed to 
 a national council. The university seconded the wish, 
 and joined in the resistance of the parliament. This 
 new resolve of the judicature was made known to the 
 monarch in February, 1518 ; and his fury was greater 
 than before. " My parliament would erect itself into a 
 senate of Venice," said he ; " let it confine itself to the 
 administration of justice, which is worse than ever. I 
 must drag the parliament in my suite, as I do the great 
 council, and watch over its conduct." After prolonging 
 the contest some time, the members were at length in- 
 duced to yield to the menaces of the king. The ob- 
 noxious concordat was registered in the presence of La 
 Tremouille ; but they at the same time entered into a 
 secret engagement to adhere in their decisions to the 
 pragmatic sanction, and not to the concordat. This 
 secret engagement they kept. When an ecclesiastical 
 vacancy occurred, the king nominated on one side, the 
 chapter elected on the other ; and the parliament, to 
 whom the dispute was referred, never failed to decide 
 in favour of the latter. The king was at length wearied 
 by this obstinacy, and ended by depriving the parlia- 
 ment of all jurisdiction over ecclesiastical appointments, 
 ordering that all disputes on these matters should be 
 referred to his council. 
 
 Francis was here made to feel how much his sale of 
 judicial offices had made the judicature independent. 
 The disinclination to meet the states-general, had thus 
 raised up in their place another body of functionaries, 
 who felt .themselves entitled and emboldened to offer at 
 the least a shadow of a national opposition. It was in- 
 deed but a shadow. The famed legal resistance which 
 the parliament henceforward claimed the right of mak- 
 ing, proved rather a cause of irritation and delay, than 
 an effectual bar to the pernicious exertions of the royal 
 will. Nevertheless it shows the effort, the tendency of 
 a great and civilised nation to establish some kind of
 
 202 HISTORY OF FRAXCE. 15I9- 
 
 check to the absolute authority of the prince. Through- 
 out all empires, however despotic, we find human nature 
 making that effort, entering that protest against utter 
 servitude. And thus we may infer, that political free- 
 dom and its guaranty form a want, a necessity, and a 
 law of his kind, towards which, as towards society or 
 self-preservation, man always, however unsuccessfully, 
 aims. 
 
 The thoughts of the French monarch were wholly 
 bent upon external policy. He had conquered Milan, 
 won over the pope, and reconciled the Swiss to his 
 interest by the promise of a large pension. He cared 
 not what sacrifices were made at home for the accom- 
 plishment of such desirable objects. The enmity of 
 Ferdinand of Spain, and of Maximilian king of the 
 Romans, still remained. The latter undertook a cam- 
 paign, in 1516, against the Venetians and French; but, 
 as usual, his attempt ended in discomfiture. Ferdinand 
 of Spain died about the same time. The first act of his 
 grandson Charles was to form a new treaty with Francis: 
 it was agreed on at Noyon. By it Claude, the infant 
 daughter of the French king, was betrothed to Charles, 
 and the French claims on Naples were to be given up as 
 her dowry. There was a vague promise that Spain should 
 restore Navarre. But the principal point to Francis was 
 a siun of money and a pension to be paid him by Charles. 
 It is evident, on looking at the treaty, that Francis gave 
 all his advantages, his own claim to Naples, those of his 
 relative to Navarre, and all, apparently, for a beggarly 
 sum of money and an annual stipend. Could he have 
 confided his wants to an assembly of the nation, he 
 would not have needed thus basely to barter his own and 
 the nation's dearly won glory. Peace was, however, 
 purchased by it, and Europe enjoyed a short interval of 
 repose. 
 
 The death of Maximilian king of the Romans took 
 place in January, 1519- It left the throne of the empire 
 vacant ; and thus a new apple of discord was flung 
 between the two great monarchs of Europe. Charles
 
 >. CHARLES V. DECLARED EMPEROR. 203 
 
 aspired to the imperial crown as heir of the house of 
 Austria; Francis as a powerful and independent monarch. 
 Both candidates employed all the means capable of 
 influencing the electors, omitting neither bribes, pro- 
 mises, nor intimidation. The question was decided by 
 a person superior to the influence of such motives : this 
 was Frederic duke of Saxony, the patron of Luther. To 
 him, for his virtues, his brother electors decreed the 
 imperial crown : but he magnanimously refused, gave 
 his voice to Charles, and brought his colleagues over to 
 this decision. Charles V. was declared emperor in 1520. 
 Francis had declared that he would woo the ambitious 
 prize, as a mistress, with chivalrous and generous feelings 
 towards his rival. Nevertheless he deeply felt the dis- 
 appointment, and by no means forgave the young emperor 
 his success. Hitherto the French monarch had enter- 
 tained feelings of friendship for Charles ; now he trans- 
 ferred them to Henry VIII., a monarch more congenial to 
 his temper. A meeting took place between them, at the 
 request of Francis, some leagues from Calais, at a spot 
 called ever after the" Field of the Cloth of Gold," from the 
 magnificence displayed by the two courts at this inter- 
 view. The time passed in festivities, and tournaments. 
 Although mutual acts of courtesy and tokens of confidence 
 passed between the princes, still the object of Francis was 
 not gained. Henry, though passionate and headlong, 
 had still the suspicious and selfish temper of his father 
 and of the Tudors : he was little given to friendship, 
 and was moreover infected with that insular prejudice 
 which represents the French as the natural enemies of 
 the English. Above all, he was jealous of the military 
 fame of Francis, and never espoused his interest till the 
 battle of Pavia humbled the gallant monarch, and erected 
 the emperor into a fitter object of envy. In short, to the 
 vanity of her king was chiefly owing England's observance 
 at that time of the great principle of the balance of 
 power. Henry met the emperor both before and after 
 his interview with Francis; and his leaning, as well as
 
 204 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1520. 
 
 that of his minister Wolsey, was evidently towards 
 Charles. 
 
 Squabbles and skirmishes were the prelude to a general 
 war. An insurrection breaking out in Spain, was con- 
 sidered as affording a favourable opportunity for recover- 
 ing Navarre. Lesparre, one of the brothers of the house 
 of Foix, marched into the province and conquered it ; 
 but, elate with success, he imprudently entered Castile 
 and besieged Logrono. This roused the pride of the 
 Spaniards. An army marched against Lesparre. A 
 battle ensued, in which, despite the French superiority 
 in cavalry and artillery, the Spanish infantry routed that 
 opposed to them, and won the victory. Navarre was 
 again lost. This expedition was not considered as a 
 formal infraction of peace, the French having reserved to 
 themselves, by treaty, the right of succouring Navarre. 
 
 A difference at the same time arose between the em- 
 peror and the family of De la Mark, dukes of Bouillon. 
 Their estates were on both frontiers, and Francis sup- 
 ported De la Mark. The latter insolently defied the 
 emperor in full diet, and afforded him ample pretext to 
 arm and to march. Italy, however, was the true centre 
 of intrigue, the chief scene of political as well as of war- 
 like events. The ambitious spirit of the popes, each 
 eager to distinguish liis reign by some signal acquisition, 
 would not allow that country to remain at peace. Leo X. 
 first leagued with Francis to conquer Naples, and 6000 
 Swiss were enlisted under pontifical banners, the king 
 furnishing half their pay. Francis, however, either 
 cooled in the project, or had reason to suspect the pope's 
 intentions. He stopped the pay of these Swiss. Recri- 
 minations and angry despatches passed between them ; 
 and Leo, piqued, flung himself into the alliance of 
 Charles. It was agreed between them to reconquer 
 the Milanese for Francis Sforza ; to restore Parma and 
 Placentia to the Holy See; in short, to banish French 
 power and influence from Italy. 
 
 The government of the conquered province had been 
 such as to render the French yoke odious to the Milanese.
 
 1520. INTRIGUES OF THE COURT. 205 
 
 The cause lay in the intrigues and corruption of the 
 court. As soon as the government has grown despotic, 
 we are instantly compelled to look for the causes of 
 events in the scandalous chronicle of harlotry. It has 
 been related that Anne, queen of Louis XII., had assem- 
 bled around her the daughters of the French nobility ; 
 and a court was" thus gradually formed, no longer com- 
 posed solely of warriors and statesmen, but of the gay 
 and idle also of both sexes. This sudden freedom had 
 an ill effect upon public morals. The principles and 
 habits of courtiers were not prepared for the increased 
 temptation. The grossness of the age did not yet admit 
 of that true and pure enjoyment of female society which 
 modern cultivation allows. Francis, when he was sud- 
 denly released from Amboise, and found himself possessed 
 of all power, and endowed with all attraction, in the 
 midst of an assemblage of beauty, gave a loose rein to 
 his passions. His wife Claude, daughter of the late 
 king, never had the command of his affections ; and the 
 court of Francis soon arrived at that state of dissolute- 
 ness which we find recorded in the pages of Brantome, 
 and from which we shrink in incredulity and disgust. 
 
 Francoise de Foix was one of those high-born maidens 
 whom Anne of Britany had reared near her person. 
 That queen had given her in marriage to the count de 
 Chateaubriand, who retained her at his remote chateau, 
 far from the fascinations of a court. Francis, however, 
 insisted on the presence of the beauty. The countess de 
 Chateaubriand was summoned to the capital, and soon 
 became the avowed and chosen mistress of her sovereign. 
 Her brother Lautrec was made governor of Milan, the 
 constable Bourbon being recalled to give place to him, 
 and the veteran Trivulzio being passed over. Thus were 
 two powerful men slighted, in order to make room for 
 the brother of the countess of Chateaubriand. Lautrec 
 was a gallant soldier, but he was tyrannical and insolent: 
 he became jealous of Trivulzio, who in his private station 
 still preserved the dignity and influence attached to his 
 years, his services, and his rank. Lautrec rendered the
 
 206 HISTORY OF FHAXCE. 1521. 
 
 French king suspicious of Trivulzio. The mistress aided 
 the insinuations of her brother. The veteran marshal 
 instantly repaired to court. Being denied admittance to 
 the royal presence, he placed himself in the way of the 
 king near Montlhery. The monarch averted his regard 
 in silence when he perceived Trivulzio. The latter, 
 stricken by the injustice and ingratitude thus mani- 
 fested, and weighed down with eighty years of trial, took 
 to his couch and died. He was buried at Chatre, near 
 Montlhery, with this epitaph over his remains 
 
 Hie quiescit qui nunquatn quievit 
 
 Lautrec's government throughout was marked with simi- 
 lar injustice. The principal inhabitants of Milan were 
 in exile and in captivity. All sighed for the restoration 
 of the Sforzas. An act of insolence and imprudence on 
 the part of Lautrec's brother afforded the pope a pretext 
 for openly breaking with the French. He suddenly 
 attacked Reggio, the chief retreat of the Milanese exiles, 
 hoping to surprise it; Guicciardini, the governor, was 
 too vigilant, however, and the injustice of the aggressor 
 was all that was gained by the French. 
 
 At this critical period the general war broke out. 
 The imperialists invaded Champagne, but were repulsed 
 from before Mezieres by the gallantry of Bayard. The 
 young Montmorency, playmate of the king, here distin- 
 guished himself. Bonnivet the favourite, and Guise, 
 warred on the Spanish frontier. Milan was the spot 
 most vulnerable, and most threatened. Still Lautrec was 
 at court, demanding money, and declaring that he would 
 not depart without a supply. He was aware of the 
 enmity of the duchess d'Angouleme, who detested 
 madame de Chateaubriand and the house of Foix : he 
 knew that she was capable of intercepting, from hate to 
 him, the funds that were destined to the defence of the 
 Milanese. Lautrec was but too clear-sighted in this. 
 Still he was persuaded to depart ; the most solemn pro- 
 mises both of Francis and his mother guarantying the 
 despatch of the necessary funds. They never came.
 
 1521. EFFORT TO RECOVER MILAN. 207 
 
 The confederates, consisting of Spain and all the Italian 
 powers, Venice alone excepted, commenced by the siege 
 of Parma. They were obliged to raise it. Lautrec was 
 at first successful, and he even lost an opportunity of 
 destroying the enemy. The Swiss served in both armies; 
 and their Diet at this time recalled them from either 
 service, to prevent the mutual slaughter of compatriots. 
 The message reached the Swiss in Lautrec's army ; that 
 addressed to the army of the confederates was inter- 
 cepted by the cardinal of Sion. Lautrec was thus aban- 
 doned by his best troops ; he was compelled to retreat ; 
 and the French were driven out of Milan. Pope Leo, 
 on his part, took Parma and Placentia. He had been 
 often heard to say, that he should die contented, could 
 he gain possession of these towns. When he won them, 
 his joy was so excessive that it brought on a fever, of 
 which he died. 
 
 The death of pope Leo gave some respite to the 
 French, and allowed Lautrec to rally. He received re- 
 inforcements from France; and induced 10,000 Swiss 
 to rejoin him, on promises of pay from the sum that had 
 not yet arrived. With these forces he pushed on to 
 recover Milan, driving before him the imperialists and 
 Sforza, who took refuge in a chateau and entrenched 
 park called the Bicoque. Lautrec's wish was to turn 
 this position ; he knew it to be too strong to carry by 
 assault. The Swiss demanded orders to attack. Lau- 
 trec used every means of dissuasion. Their reply was, 
 " Our pay, or the signal for action." The first of these 
 alternatives was not in Lautrec's power, and he was thus 
 forced to abide by the second. The Swiss, in whose 
 front rank Montmorency marched, attacked the en- 
 trenchments with their wonted fury. They would not 
 even wait for the filling up of the fosse. A tremendous 
 fire of artillery swept away whole ranks, while the 
 musquetry brought down, one by one, the brave fellows 
 who had descended into the ditch, and were vainly 
 poking the walls with their lances. Their general, de 
 la Pierre, and twenty-two of the Swiss captains, perished.
 
 208 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1522. 
 
 Montmorency, wounded, was almost smothered under a 
 heap of slain. The rest of the Swiss, indignant against 
 Lautrec for the consequences of their own temerity, in- 
 stantly abandoned him, and marched off for their moun- 
 tains. Thus were the French once more driven from 
 Italy. 
 
 The rage of Francis against his unsuccessful general 
 was extreme. He refused to see him. The duchess d'An- 
 gouleme exasperated the king's animosity by her cen- 
 sures ; while madame de Chateaubriand dared not inter- 
 cede for her brother. At length the constable procured 
 Lautrec admission to the king, who covered him with 
 reproaches. " It is not I who am to blame," said Lau- 
 trec ; " the gendarmerie have served eighteen months 
 without pay ; and the wilfulness of the Swiss, both in 
 fighting against my wish, and then abandoning me, was 
 owing to my inability to pay them." " And the 
 400,000 crowns?" said the king: "Were never received," 
 was the answer. Francis summoned his treasurer, 
 Semblancay, and asked him sternly, how came it that 
 the promised sum had not yet reached Lautrec ? The 
 treasurer replied, that the duchess d'Angouleme had 
 made him pay it to her. The king then rushed to the 
 apartments of his mother : " It is to your avarice then, 
 madam, that I owe the loss of the Milanese." The 
 duchess could not deny the receipt of the sum, but she 
 alleged having received it on her private account. The 
 excuse did not satisfy the monarch, and Semblancay 
 kept his station. The vengeance of the queen-mother 
 henceforth unremittingly followed the unfortunate trea- 
 surer. Heads of accusation can never be wanting against 
 a man entrusted with the finances of a kingdom ; and 
 five years after, Semblancay, an honest and irreproach- 
 able minister, fell a victim to the intrigues and iniquity 
 of the monarch's mother, and died as a malefactor on 
 the common gibbet. 
 
 Whilst Francis met with these reverses, which were 
 the natural consequences of the blunders and reckless- 
 ness of his administration, the emperor Charles was
 
 1523. THE CONSTABLE BOURBON OFFENDED. 209 
 
 carefully securing every friend, and improving every 
 advantage. The new pope, Adrian, was his creature : 
 Wolsey's resentment, on being disappointed of the tiara, 
 was soothed for a time; and Henry VIII. was induced 
 not only to break with France, but to send thither an 
 army under the duke of Suffolk, which, however, 
 achieved nothing remarkable. The Venetian republic, also, 
 the last of the Italian powers that inclined to France, 
 was estranged from his friendship, and joined the 
 alliance against him. 
 
 Not content with making every foreign potentate his 
 foe, the French monarch had at the same time the im- 
 prudence to alienate the most powerful of his subjects. 
 Trivulzio, we have seen, expired beneath his neglect. 
 Charles, duke of Bourbon, and constable of the king- 
 dom, was now driven by injustice to league with the 
 enemies of his country. The last duke of Bourbon 
 had left a daughter, Suzanne. The title, and a certain 
 portion of the heritage, went by law to the male heir ; 
 but as a considerable part would be inherited by Su- 
 zanne, the paternal care of Louis XII. arranged a mar- 
 riage between Charles, the existing duke, and Suzanne 
 de Bourbon, thus preserving unbroken the heritage and 
 title of that illustrious family. The duke was of a 
 handsome person ; and on the death of his duchess, Su- 
 zanne, without issue, the duchess d'Angouleme made 
 advances to fill her place. This she was the more for- 
 ward in doing, as, being descended in the female line 
 from a previous duke of Bourbon, she considered herself 
 to have claims on that part of the property which might 
 descend to a female. The constable, however, was blind 
 to her advances, backed by this tacit menace. And the 
 slighted duchess instantly put forward her claim to the 
 Bourbonnais as appertaining by right to her. 
 
 Bourbon had previously received affronts from the 
 king, who disliked his cold temper and reserved de- 
 meanour. The duke was grave and dignified, fond of 
 war and business, and averse to join in the follies of a 
 court. It appears, too, that Francis amused himself at 
 
 VOL. i. p
 
 210 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1523. 
 
 the duke's expense ; and the latter bore raillery with so 
 little good humour, as to be called the " Prince of small 
 endurance." Whatever was the cause, they certainly 
 disliked each other; and Francis manifested this feeling 
 first by recalling Bourbon from the government of Milan, 
 and afterwards by giving the command of the vanguard 
 in one of the northern campaigns to the duke of Alen- 
 con, although that post of honour was the constable's 
 right. 
 
 Bearing all this in mind, when his hitherto unques- 
 tioned right to the Bourbonnais was called in question, 
 the duke instantly apprehended that a league to destroy 
 him had been planned by the king and his mother. Du- 
 prat, the chancellor, was but a creature of the latter ; 
 and to hope for justice in the event of trial was absurd. 
 Bourbon was, therefore, driven to look abroad for a 
 refuge or for vengeance. The emperor's emissary was 
 at hand, proffering him that prince's sister in marriage, 
 and many advantages, if he would join the emperor's 
 party, and raise a civil war in France against its mo- 
 narch. Bourbon hesitated long, but finally acceded to 
 the proposals of Charles. Francis in the mean time had 
 been roused from the lap of pleasure by the league of all 
 Europe against him. He was at Lyons, on his way to 
 Italy at the head of an army, when Bourbon was about 
 to take the fatal step. Francis tried to soothe him : he 
 showed his confidence by appointing him lieutenant- 
 general of the kingdom; and assured him, that whatever 
 might be the result of this unfortunate process, he would 
 not see him despoiled. The object of Francis seems to 
 have been the gratification of his mother, and the driving 
 of Bourbon to a marriage with her. This failed, how- 
 ever, like every act of the monarch's policy. The con- 
 stable determined to join the emperor. But Francis was 
 now near, accompanied with forces ; and as circum- 
 stances had awakened his suspicions, he called on the 
 constable to accompany him to Italy. Bourbon feigned 
 sickness, and took to his couch, as a pretext for delay ; 
 till at length, seeing that it would be dangerous to trifle
 
 1524. BOURBON JOINS THE EMPEROR. 211 
 
 any longer with the impatient Francis, the constable 
 dispersed his suite and fled, followed by a single attend- 
 ant, into the dominions of the emperor. Francis gained 
 by this desertion, as he confiscated the wide domains of 
 Bourbon. Charles acquired what he least wanted, a 
 general, and an unfortunate claimant. 
 
 Bonnivet, the personal enemy of Bourbon, was now 
 entrusted with the command of the French army. He 
 marched without opposition into the Milanese, and might 
 have taken the capital had he pushed on to its gates. 
 Having by irresolution lost it, he retreated to winter 
 quarters behind the Tesino. The operations of the 
 English in Picardy, of the imperialists in Champagne, 
 and of the Spaniards near the Pyrenees, were equally 
 insignificant. The spring of 1524 brought on an action, 
 if the attack of one point can be called such, which 
 proved decisive for the time. Bonnivet advanced rashly 
 beyond the Tesino. The imperialists, commanded by 
 four able generals, Launoi, Pescara, Bourbon, and Sforza, 
 succeeded in almost cutting off his retreat. They at the 
 same time refused Bonnivet's offer to engage. They 
 hoped to weaken him by famine. The Swiss first mur- 
 mured against the distress occasioned by want of pre- 
 caution. They deserted across the river ; and Bonnivet, 
 thus abandoned, was obliged to make a precipitate and 
 perilous retreat. A bridge was hastily flung across the 
 Sessia, near Romagnano; and Bonnivet, with his best 
 knights and gensdarmerie, undertook to defend the pass- 
 age of the rest of the army. The imperialists, led on 
 by Bourbon, made a furious attack. Bonnivet was 
 wounded, and he gave his place to Bayard, who, never 
 entrusted with a high command, was always chosen for 
 that of a forlorn hope. The brave Vandenesse was soon 
 killed ; and Bayard himself received a gun-shot through 
 the reins. The gallant chevalier, feeling his wound 
 mortal, caused himself to be placed in a sitting posture 
 beneath a tree, his face to the enemy, and his sword 
 fixed in guise of a cross before him. The constable 
 Bourbon, who led the imperialists, soon came up to the 
 p 2
 
 212 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1524. 
 
 dying Bayard, and expressed his compassion. " Weep 
 not for me/' said the chevalier, "but for thyself. I die 
 in performing my duty ; thou art betraying thine." 
 
 Nothing marks more strongly the great rise, the sudden 
 sacro-sanctity of the royal authority in those days, than 
 the general horror which the treason of Bourbon excited; 
 whilst not very many years previous, the frequent con- 
 spiracies of Louis XII., when duke of Orleans, are 
 related as common occurrences, of no extraordinary cri- 
 minality. The fact is, that this sudden horror of treason 
 was owing, in a great measure, to the revived study of 
 the classics, in which treason to one's country is univer- 
 sally mentioned as an impiety and a crime of the deepest 
 dye. Feudality, with all its oaths, had no such horror 
 of treason. Thus it happened, singularly, that these 
 classic writings, considered, and rightly so, as replete 
 with a spirit hostile to tyranny, nevertheless afforded to 
 the modern world a maxim which has proved one of the 
 strongest supports of kingly power. 
 
 Bonnivet had evacuated Italy after this defeat at Ro- 
 magnano. Bourbon's animosity stimulated him to push 
 his advantage. He urged the emperor to invade France, 
 and recommended the Bourbonnais and his own patri- 
 monial provinces as those most advisable to invade. 
 Bourbon wanted to raise his friends in insurrection 
 against Francis ; but Charles descried selfishness in this 
 scheme of Bourbon, and directed Pescara to march with 
 the constable into the south of France and lay siege to 
 Marseilles. Although in this his views were thwarted, 
 still Bourbon promised that the terror of his name should 
 bring the burgesses with the keys at the first cannon- 
 shot. The boast was idle ; Marseilles made an obstinate 
 resistance ; and Pescara, who envied the exiled prince, 
 did not spare his railleries on the occasion. Whilst 
 mass was performing in the general's tent, a shot from 
 the town swept away the officiating priest and several 
 officers. On hearing the bustle, Bourbon came forth to 
 ask the cause : ' ' Oh ! " replied Pescara, " it is the bur-
 
 1524. SIEGE OF PAVIA. 213 
 
 gesses of Marseilles, who bring us the keys of their 
 town." 
 
 Francis, in the mean time, alarmed by the invasion, 
 had assembled an army. He burned to employ it, and 
 avenge the late affront. The king of England, occupied 
 with the Scotch, gave him respite in the north; and he 
 resolved to employ this by marching, late as the season 
 was, into Italy. His generals, who by this time were 
 sick of warring beyond the Alps, opposed the design : 
 but not even the death of his queen, Claude, could stop 
 Francis. He passed Mount Cenis ; marched upon Milan, 
 whose population was spiritless and broken by the plague, 
 and took it without resistance. It was then mooted 
 whether Lodi or Pavia should be besieged. The latter, 
 imprudently, as it is said, was preferred. It was at 
 this time that pope Clement VII., of the house of Me- 
 dici, who had lately succeeded Adrian, made the most 
 zealous efforts to restore peace between the monarchies. 
 He found Charles and his generals arrogant and un- 
 willing to treat. The French, said they, must on no 
 account be allowed a footing in Italy. Clement, im- 
 pelled by pique towards the emperor, or generosity to 
 Francis, at once abandoned the prudent policy of his 
 predecessors, and formed a league with the French king, 
 to whom, after all, he brought no accession of force. 
 This step proved afterwards fatal to the city of Rome. 
 
 The siege of Pavia was formed about the middle of 
 October. Antonio de Leyva, an experienced officer, 
 supported by veteran troops, commanded in the town. 
 The fortifications were strong, and were likely to hold 
 for a considerable time. By the month of January the 
 French had made no progress ; and the impatient Francis 
 despatched a considerable portion of his army for the 
 invasion of Naples, hearing that the country was drained 
 of troops. This was a gross blunder, which Pescara 
 observing, forbore to send any force to oppose the ex- 
 pedition. He knew that the fate of Italy would be de- 
 cided before Pavia. Bourbon, in the mean time, dis- 
 gusted with the jealousies and tardiness of the imperial 
 p 3
 
 214 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1525. 
 
 generals, employed the winter in raising an army of 
 lansquenets on his own account. From the duke of 
 Savoy he procured funds ; and early in the year 1525 the 
 constable joined Pescara at Lodi with a fresh army of 
 12,000 mercenaries. They had, besides, some 7000 
 foot, and not more than 1500 horse. With these they 
 marched to the relief of Pavia. 
 
 Francis had a force to oppose to them, not only in- 
 ferior in numbers, but so harassed with a winter's siege, 
 that all the French generals of experience counselled a 
 retreat. Bonnivet and his young troop of courtiers were 
 for righting; and the monarch hearkened to them. Pavia, 
 to the north of the river, was covered in great part by the 
 chiUeau and walled park of Mirabel. Adjoining this, 
 and on a rising ground, was the French camp, extending 
 to the Tesino. Through the camp, or through the park, 
 lay the only ways by which the imperialists could reach 
 Pavia. The camp was strongly entrenched and defended 
 by artillery, except on the side of the park of Mirabel, 
 with which it communicated, and which was occupied 
 by the duke of Alencon, commanding what was called 
 the rear-guard. 
 
 The night of the 23d of February was employed by 
 the imperialists in sapping the park-wall. At daybreak 
 on the 24th a large breach appeared, and the marquis 
 del Guasto rushed in, surprised the duke of Alencon, 
 and carried the chateau of Mirabel. Brion succeeded 
 in rallying the French, and keeping del Guasto in check, 
 until de Genouillac, the master of the artillery, brought 
 his cannon to bear on the park and its breach. His 
 vigorous and well directed fire discomfited del Guasto, 
 slaughtered the imperialists, and drove them in rout and 
 retreat back through the breach. This was victory 
 enough, could the French king have been contented with 
 it. But the impatient Francis no sooner beheld his ene- 
 mies in rout, than he was eager to chase them in person, 
 and complete the victory with his good sword. He 
 rushed forth from his entrenchments at the head of his 
 gensdarmerie, flinging himself between the enemy and
 
 1525. BATTLE OF PA VIA. 215 
 
 his own artillery, which was thus masked and rendered 
 useless. The imperialists rallied as soon as they found 
 themselves safe from the fire of the cannon: the other 
 French chiefs advanced to the succour of their monarch ; 
 Alencon supported by the Swiss on the left, Chabannes 
 on the right ; and thus it was no longer the attack and 
 defence of an entrenched camp, but a drawn battle upon 
 an open plain. 
 
 The famous black bands of Germans in the French 
 service found themselves to the right of the king, be- 
 tween him and the marshal de Chabannes. They were 
 opposed by Bourbon and his lansquenets, who bore 
 toward the brother mercenaries of their country a deadly 
 hate. Bourbon's vengeance led them on, and the black 
 bands were annihilated in the struggle that took place. 
 Their leader, the attainted duke of Suffolk, perished 
 with them, as well as a brother of the duke of Lorraine. 
 Bourbon then turned upon the corps of Chabannes, 
 whom he had separated from the centre; and his lans- 
 quenets were here equally successful. Chabannes was 
 made prisoner, and slain in a quarrel between two cap- 
 tains, who disputed the honour of having taken him. 
 The king, in the mean time, fought with undaunted 
 courage. He slew the marquis St. Ange with his own 
 hand, and routed the Italian troops. But he was ill 
 seconded on his left by the Swiss, who unaccountably 
 forgot their ancient valour, and by the duke of Alencon, 
 who fled disgracefully from the field. The Spaniards 
 pressed him, but could not vanquish the French knights 
 resolved to perish around their monarch. At length 
 Bourbon, victorious over the entire right wing, turned 
 the stream of his lansquenets against the centre. They 
 broke the remaining mass of gensdarmerie, and separ- 
 ated them into knots, which still fought desperately, 
 and refused to fly. The battle, confined to this one 
 point, became a confused butchery. Chaumont, Hector 
 de Bourbon, perished : the marechal de Foix, Lautrec's 
 brother, received his death wound, while he was seeking, 
 with his drawn sword, Bonnivet, the enemy of his house, 
 p 4
 
 216 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1525. 
 
 and the cause of this disaster. Bonnivet himself, un- 
 willing to survive, flung himself on the pikes of the 
 lansquenets. The sight of his dead body gratified the 
 gloomy vengeance of Bourbon. The king, in the mean 
 time, behind a heap of slain, defended himself valiantly; 
 so beaten and shattered, so begrimed with blood and 
 dust, as to be scarcely distinguishable, notwithstanding 
 his conspicuous armour. He had received several wounds, 
 one in the forehead ; and his horse, struck with a ball in 
 the head, reared, fell back, and crushed him with his 
 weight : still Francis rose, and laid prostrate several of 
 the enemies that rushed upon him. At this moment he 
 was recognised by Pomperant, the only companion of 
 Bourbon's flight. This gentleman sprang to his aid, 
 fell an instant as if for pardon at the monarch's feet, 
 and then rose to defend him. He at the same time 
 counselled Francis to surrender, telling him that Bourbon 
 was near. The king, enraged at the name, protested he 
 would rather die than surrender to the traitor. Pom- 
 perant therefore sent for Lannoi, the viceroy of Xaples, 
 to whom Francis yielded his sword. 
 
 Such was the signal defeat that put an end to all 
 French conquests and claims in Italy. Francis wrote 
 the following brief letter to his mother: " All is lost, 
 madam, save honour and life." He was removed to the 
 castle of Pizzighitone, till the emperor's pleasure should 
 be known. Though humbled, the king did not lose his 
 equanimity : he even received Bourbon without giving 
 vent to indignation ; Pescara he welcomed with admir- 
 ation and esteem. The first act of the emperor, on 
 learning the captivity of his rival, was to conceal his joy, 
 to forbid rejoicing, and to affect moderation. Charles's 
 instinct was dissimulation. His next act was ta pro- 
 pose the harshest terms to Francis, the cession not only 
 of Milan and of Naples, but also of Burgundy. Francis, 
 who flattered himself that such a want of generosity 
 proceeded from the crafty counsellors of Charles rather 
 than from himself, longed for an interview with that 
 prince. The desire was eagerly caught up by Lannoi,
 
 IS 25. TREATY WITH ENGLAND. 217 
 
 who was anxious to remove Francis from Italy, where 
 his guard was uncertain, and where either Sforza, 
 Bourbon, or Pescara, might conspire to liberate him for 
 their own advantage. The headlong Francis gave in to 
 the snare. He himself furnished galleys for the voyage 
 to Spain, and his mandate prohibited the rest of the fleet 
 from attempting to intercept him. Arrived at Madrid, 
 Francis was still kept closely guarded. The interview, 
 for which he had made such efforts, was denied him ; 
 and many weeks elapsed, without the emperor's deigning 
 to visit his captive. Such unexpected neglect cut the 
 sanguine Francis to the soul. His spirit sunk under 
 his misfortune and defeat ; and a fever, occasioned by 
 despondency, threatened to put an end at once to the 
 Life of Francis and the advantages of Charles. The 
 latter at length gave to interest what he refused to ge- 
 nerosity. He visited Francis, affected cordiality, and 
 was profuse of the kindest promises. Obvious as were 
 the motives and the insincerity of this friendship, the 
 royal captive trusted to it, and recovered his spirits and 
 his health. 
 
 France in the mean time, though stunned and dis- 
 ordered by the first news of the disaster of Pavia, was 
 recovering its composure and force. The 'duchess of 
 Angouleme was regent; the count de Vendome, cousin 
 of the constable Bourbon, did not take advantage of his 
 being first prince of the blood, to embroil the kingdom. 
 The parliament, indeed, displeased with the imperious 
 character of the king, and angered on account of the 
 concordat and other causes, gave the regent some 
 trouble. But new allies flocked to France in her dis- 
 tress. The Italian states were all ready to combine 
 against the emperor, whose power they now dreaded. 
 Henry VIII. of England instantly flung his support into 
 the scale of the discomfited Francis, and concluded a treaty 
 with the regent, stipulating that the kingdom should 
 on no account be dismembered. Large numbers of the 
 people of Alsace had taken advantage of the opportunity 
 to rise and invade France, excited by that religious
 
 218 HISTORY OF FRANCE. j 526. 
 
 zeal which scorns restraint. The count of Guise mus- 
 tered some forces, fell upon them in time, and cut them to 
 pieces. It was for this service that Francis afterwards 
 created the county of Guise into a duchy-peerage, an 
 honour heretofore granted solely to princes of the blood. 
 The parliament made great opposition to this novelty ; 
 but the king was resolute in his friendship, and Guise 
 became one of the high noblesse of France, a duke and 
 peer. 
 
 Negotiations for the liberation of the king proceeded, 
 with little prospect of success, at Madrid. Bourbon 
 had betaken himself thither ; his presence and his claims 
 were no small source of difficulties. The emperor had 
 promised him his sister Eleanora, queen-dowager of 
 Portugal, in marriage ; but as Francis, to disappoint 
 Bourbon, offered to marry this princess himself, the 
 constable was obliged to forego the honour. The marquis 
 Pescara dying at this time, the emperor offered the com- 
 mand of his Italian armies to Bourbon, who was urged 
 to accept of it, and was thus got rid of. Still the terms 
 offered to Francis were so harsh that he could not 
 accede to them. His sister, the duchess of Alencon, 
 had come to tend him in his illness and captivity. She 
 was now about to return ; and Francis put into her hand 
 his absolute resignation of the kingdom, that he might 
 be considered as dead, and no farther efforts be made for 
 his liberation. This alarmed the emperor, who became 
 willing to relax in some degree. Still his demands were so 
 exorbitant and unreasonable, that Francis at length con- 
 sented to extricate himself by a breach of faith, and to 
 swear to a treaty, the stipulations of which he was deter- 
 mined not to perform. 
 
 With these opposite views, grasping severity, that 
 over-reached itself, on the one side, and premeditated 
 bad faith, the almost compulsory resource of Francis, on 
 the other, the treaty of Madrid was concluded. By it 
 the king agreed to give up Burgundy, to renounce all 
 right to Milan and Naples, as well as to Flanders and 
 Artois. He was to be set at liberty, and to espouse
 
 1526. FKANCIS RELEASED. 219 
 
 Eleanora of Portugal, the emperor's sister. He was, more- 
 over, to abandon his allies, the king of Navarre, the 
 dukes of Gueldres, of Wirtemberg, and De la Mark ; 
 and he was to re-establish Bourbon in all his property 
 and privileges. Moreover, the two sons of Francis were 
 to remain as hostages for the performance of these con- 
 ditions, the king himself promising to return into cap- 
 tivity if they were not fulfilled. On the 14th of 
 January, 1526, the treaty was signed; Francis taking the 
 precaution to protest secretly, in presence of his chan- 
 cellor, against the validity of such exactions. Charles 
 himself could not but mistrust the sincerity of Francis, 
 and he even retained him prisoner a month after the 
 signature. The king's health again declined in conse- 
 quence ; and at length Charles, in a hurried and irreso- 
 lute way, gave orders for his final liberation. He was 
 led to the river Bidassoa, which separates the countries: 
 his sons, who appeared on the opposite bank, were ex- 
 changed for him, and Francis, mounting a horse of ex- 
 treme swiftness, galloped without drawing rein to St. 
 Jean de Luz, and thence to Bayonne. 
 
 Thus freed from captivity, on terms which, if fulfilled, 
 must ruin his kingdom, and if unfulfilled must stain his 
 honour, Francis, it might have been expected, would be 
 instantly occupied in the duty of defending himself and 
 retrieving his affairs. His first act on arriving at Bor- 
 deaux, however, was to become enamoured of made- 
 moiselle d'Heilly, better known as the duchess d'Etampes, 
 who superseded the countess of Chateaubriand in his 
 affections, and held thenceforward the greatest influence 
 over the monarch 
 
 The liberation of Francis was the signal for a general 
 league against the emperor. The Italian powers were 
 ever disposed to unite against the strongest. Sforza had 
 already rebelled against Charles, and had been driven 
 from Milan by Pescara. All of them, the pope, the 
 Venetians, the Florentines, now formed an alliance with 
 the king, on condition that Sforza should remain in pos- 
 session of Milan. A treaty to this effect was signed at
 
 220 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1526. 
 
 Cognac, but was kept secret for some time. The states 
 of Burgundy had assembled, to protest against the trans- 
 fer of their province to the emperor. The king, they 
 said, had no right nor power to make such a stipulation 
 without their consent. When Lannoi, on the part of 
 Charles, demanded the cession of Burgundy, Francis 
 referred him to the answer of the states. The emperor, 
 on learning this evasion of the treaty, caUed on Francis, 
 as a man of honour, to redeem his word and return into 
 captivity. 
 
 This was a trying moment for Francis, who piqued 
 himself on possessing all the chivalric virtues. He could 
 not openly deride the credulity of Charles, as Louis XI. 
 or Ferdinand the Catholic would have done. He was per- 
 plexed, distressed, and could only allege the necessity of 
 the case ; a plea which by no means satisfied his nice 
 notions of honour. He therefore resolved on taking the 
 advice of his subjects. Despotic as he was, he felt in 
 this case at least the necessity of having the nation to 
 participate his responsibility. To call together the 
 states-general of the kingdom was obviously the natural 
 step in such a case. But no; Francis dreaded the 
 very name of that assembly, in which the vulgar tiers 
 6tat, or people, had a voice. The legists and judges of 
 the parliament had for some time taken upon them to 
 represent the nation, in demurring to taxes and to edicts. 
 Francis, and his minister Duprat, though not wholly 
 contented with the parliament, yet deemed that prefer- 
 able to an assembly of burgesses. It was resolved 
 therefore between them, that the voice of the nation 
 should now be taken, not in the good old states-general, 
 but in what has since been called an assembly of nota- 
 bles one of the most unfortunate inventions or inno- 
 vations that despotic craft could have imagined. 
 
 This assembly of notables, or, as some historians will 
 call it, this bed of justice, was held in December, 1526. 
 It consisted of prelates, nobles, courtiers, gentlemen, the 
 parliament of Paris, and the presidents of the provincial 
 parliaments; the only admixture of democracy being
 
 1526. ASSEMBLY OF NOTABLES. 221 
 
 the provost of merchants and the four sheriffs of the city 
 of Paris.* Before those Francis made a long discourse ; 
 entering at large into the affairs of the kingdom, its 
 finances and resources. He recounted the misfortunes 
 of his captivity, and declared his readiness to return to 
 it, if his people thought that either their interest or his 
 honour so demanded. The reply of each class, for all 
 answered separately, was, that he was absolved from an 
 unjust and compulsory oath, against which he had pre- 
 viously protested, and the fulfilment of which the privi- 
 leges and welfare of his people alike forbade. They at 
 the same time accorded to him the liberty of raising 
 two millions for the ransom of his sons, assuming in this 
 particular all the rights of the states-general. Thus 
 satisfied, Francis published the general league against 
 the emperor, denominated Holy, because the pope was 
 at its head. Not only the Italian states, but the Swiss 
 and the king of England acceded to it ; so that the 
 reverses of Francis, if they had stripped him of terri- 
 tories, rendered him much stronger in alliances than his 
 rival. The emperor, on his side, promised to Bourbon 
 the investiture of the Milanese, if he succeeded in ex- 
 pelling Sforza. This the constable accomplished, sub- 
 sisting his mercenary troops on the unfortunate inhabit- 
 ants of Milan for of money Charles had as notorious a 
 lack as his grandsire Maximilian. Milan taken, pillaged, 
 and wasted, how was Bourbon to support his army that 
 army by which he lived ? for since his exile the prince 
 had inhabited camps, and was averse to any more orderly 
 way of life. He loved his soldiers, rapacious and licen- 
 tious as they were ; and was beloved by them, as a valiant 
 and successful leader inclined to tolerate the license of 
 the freebooter. Since his treason, Bourbon had met 
 every where with insults and ingratitude from the French, 
 the Spaniards, the emperor, and his brother generals. 
 This situation made him misanthropic, and his character 
 degenerated into that of the reckless and ferocious corsair. 
 
 * We may judge of the independence of these only representatives of the 
 commons by the fact that Francis caused his learned follower, Budseus, to 
 be elected provost of the merchants of the city of Paris.
 
 222 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1527- 
 
 To obtain plunder for his army of lansquenets, in lieu 
 of pay, became indispensable ; and he accordingly led 
 them south, menacing all the great cities of the peninsula, 
 and uncertain which he should attack. Florence and 
 Rome had both declared against the emperor : Bourbon 
 fixed upon the imperial city as the most glorious prey, 
 and accordingly marched thither his mercenary army. 
 Pope Clement was terrified at his approach, and used 
 all his country's artifices to avert the danger. It ap- 
 proached nevertheless, and Clement shut himself up in 
 the castle of St. Angelo. The army of Bourbon attacked 
 Rome in the morning of the 5th of May, 1527- Bour- 
 bon himself applied the first scaling-ladder, and was in 
 the act of mounting it, when the first shot from the 
 walls struck him and put an end to his disastrous 
 career. His army passed over his body to the assault, 
 and Rome was carried by storm. The pillage was 
 general, so merciless were the soldiery. Not all the 
 ravages of Hun and Goth surpassed those of the army 
 of the first prince in Christendom. The cruelty of the 
 German soldiers was unequalled : they indulged in the 
 most horrid extravagance of debauch and impiety. For 
 two months they remained masters of the city; and the 
 pontiff himself was finally obliged to surrender himself a 
 prisoner. 
 
 This new triumph of the emperor, over the head of 
 the church too, roused the zeal of Henry VIII. He 
 already meditated a divorce from Catherine, Charles's 
 aunt ; and it therefore became his policy to befriend and 
 protect the pope, whose assistance he would chiefly re- 
 quire, against the emperor. Wolsey was therefore des- 
 patched to France ; the treaty between the crowns was 
 renewed ; and a joint army was raised, to march into 
 Italy under the command of Lautrec. That general 
 now compensated for his former ill success. He made 
 himself master of Genoa by the aid of Andrew Doria; 
 and took Pavia by assault, abandoning it to pillage, in 
 revenge for the defeat which the French had suffered 
 under its walls. The conquest of Milan would have
 
 1528. OPERATIONS ACAINST NAPLES. 223 
 
 been easy ; but as that city was now to belong to Sforza, 
 the French general turned from it towards Rome, in 
 order to procure the liberation of the pope. His ap- 
 proach effected this : the emperor became less harsh in 
 his terms, and Clement soon found himself free at 
 Orvieto. 
 
 It was about this time, towards the commencement 
 of 1528, that challenges and defiances passed between 
 Charles and Francis. The former, in his reply to the 
 French envoy, reproached the restored king with an in- 
 famous breach of faith; and hinted that he was ready to 
 support his charge as a true knight, sword in hand. 
 Francis, indignant, sent a reply, that the emperor " lied 
 in his throat;" and demanded a rendezvous, or champ 
 clos, for the duel; but notwithstanding the choler of both 
 parties, it never took place. It is singular, that in this 
 affair of the single combat the cold and politic Charles 
 seems to have been most in earnest, whilst the obstacles 
 and delays were raised by the headlong and chivalric 
 Francis. 
 
 Lautrec in the mean time advanced to the conquest 
 of Naples. He marched to the eastern coast, and 
 soon reduced the provinces bordering on the Adriatic. 
 The command of Bourbon's army had devolved on Phi- 
 libert, the last prince of Orange of the house of Chalons, 
 another French chief of talents and influence, whom the 
 petulance of Francis had alienated from him and driven 
 into exile. With some difficulty this prince withdrew 
 his army from the spoils of Rome to the defence of 
 Naples. He was not strong enough to face Lautrec in 
 the field: the prince of Orange, therefore, and Mon- 
 cada the new viceroy, shut themselves up in Naples, 
 where they were soon besieged by Lautrec. Andrew 
 Doria, a faithful partisan of France, held the sea with 
 his Genoese galleys, and blockaded the port. It was 
 proposed to reduce the town by famine. After some 
 time Moncada, fitting out all the galleys in port, made 
 an attack on the Genoese, then commanded by Philip- 
 pine Doria, Andrew's nephew. The attempt failed ;
 
 224 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1528. 
 
 the Spaniards were beaten, Moncada slain, and most 
 of the captains taken ; amongst others, the marquis del 
 Guasto, and two brothers Colonna. Naples thus became 
 in prospect an easy prey to Lautrec. Its fall might have 
 brought the final submission of the kingdom ; but the 
 same blunder which Francis persevered in committing 
 throughout his whole reign, lost him this advantage, 
 among so many others. 
 
 Such was the fatal habit of the French king to dis- 
 gust and alienate his best and most attached friends. 
 Doria, for example, like Trivulzio, was an Italian who 
 united with a love of his own country a firm attachment 
 to the French. His exertions had but just torn Genoa 
 from the emperor to give it to Francis : he was now 
 doing the very same by Naples, when it pleased the 
 French court to insult and disoblige him. The prisoners 
 he had won in action were taken from him, and no 
 allowance was made for their ransom. These insults to 
 himself Doria might have passed over ; of wrongs 
 offered to his country he was more sensible. The French 
 undertook to fortify Savona, and to raise it into a rival of 
 Genoa. They removed thither the trade in salt, one of 
 the most lucrative sources of the Genoese commerce. Doria 
 expostulated ; and another admiral, Barbescenas, was 
 sent to supersede him and bring him prisoner to France. 
 When the admiral arrived, Doria received him, saying, 
 " I know what brings you hither : the French vessels I 
 deliver to you ; the Genoese remain under my command. 
 Do the rest of your errand if you dare ! " The conse- 
 quence of this blindness and ingratitude on the part of 
 Francis was soon seen ; Genoa declared herself free, 
 and allied herself with the emperor. The blockade of 
 Naples by sea was raised ; and the influx of fresh troops 
 and provisions enabled the city to defy its besiegers. 
 These, encamped under a midsummer sun, ill supplied, 
 and harassed, were soon attacked by pestilence. Lau- 
 trec their general died of it. The marquis of Saluces, 
 who succeeded him, raised the siege and retired to 
 Aversa, where he soon after surrendered to the prince of
 
 1529- PEACE OF CAMERA Y. 225 
 
 Orange ; and thus another unsuccessful Italian expedi- 
 tion was added to the long list of French disasters. 
 
 Another army led by the count of St. Pol into the north 
 of Italy met with as little success. Francis felt that he 
 could not re-establish his fortunes : he sickened of the 
 love of glory that had hitherto animated him, and 
 showed himself willing to treat for peace on any terms, 
 provided the cession of Burgundy was not insisted on. 
 Charles by this time saw that the nation would never 
 consent to such a sacrifice : he therefore waved this part 
 of the treaty of Madrid. The negotiations on both sides 
 were carried on by the duchess of Angouleme and Mar- 
 garet of Austria. The king gave up all his claims to 
 possessions in Italy, Milan, Naples, and even Asti, 
 and abandoned all his allies in that country ; he re- 
 nounced all right of sovereignty over Flanders or Artois ; 
 he ceded Tournay and Arras ; two millions were to be 
 paid as ransom for the young princes ; the lands of the 
 house of Bourbon were to be restored to the heirs of 
 that family (a stipulation, by the by, never performed) ; 
 and, finally, the treaty was to be sealed by the marriage 
 of Francis with Eleonora, the emperor's sister. This 
 peaceof Cambray, called also the "Lady's Peace," was con- 
 cluded in August, 1 529 : it was as glorious for Charles, 
 as it was disgraceful to France and her monarch. The 
 emperor remained supreme master of Italy ; the pope 
 submitted, and obtained the re-establishment of the 
 Medici in Florence, with hereditary power ; the Vene- 
 tians, who said that Cambray was destined to be their 
 purgatory, were shorn of their conquests. Charles for- 
 gave Sforza, and left him the duchy of Milan. Henry 
 VIII. reaped nothing save die emperor's enmity by his 
 interference : the English monarch showed himself ge- 
 nerous to Francis, by remitting to him, at this moment, 
 a large debt. Thus was Europe pacified for the time. 
 
 On a retrospect over more than half a century pre- 
 ceding, we may contemplate a stirring and eventful 
 period. War appears with all its variety of achieve- 
 ments and fortunes. Ambition, conquest, reverses, 
 
 VOL. I. Q
 
 226 HISTORY OF PRANCE. 1520. 
 
 intrigues, the rise and fall of families, the extension of 
 territories and powers, the most prominent materials 
 of history are there to be found ; and yet all this is but 
 an idle pageant. Scarcely one of these mighty events 
 forms a link in the great chain of cause and effect. 
 They are inconsequential, merely a web woven to be again 
 unravelled, like Charles VIII.'s conquest of Italy, of 
 which not a vestige now remained to Francis. Why 
 is this ? because the selfish wills and views of indivi- 
 dual monarchs had become the sole grounds of policy, the 
 sole motives of action. Every thing like principle was 
 extinguished. The people, the aristocracy, the church, 
 had each and all humbled themselves in the dust be- 
 neath the monarch's foot In them there is no change 
 or progress to record. The monarch alone " playing 
 his fantastic tricks before high heaven," occupies the 
 stage ; and the historian has but to handle the ro- 
 mancer's pen in following the steps, detailing the motives, 
 describing the achievements and disasters of his hero. 
 It is relief to have this selfishness, this monotonous 
 operation of the same cause, here interrupted by a great 
 principle that began to agitate all classes, and to give 
 fresh life to the public mind in Europe. This was the 
 great maxim of religious freedom, the groundwork of 
 the reformation. 
 
 The present limits do not allow space to discuss the 
 supreme authority and infallibility usurped by the popes. 
 The most enlightened Romanists defend it more as an 
 expediency than as a right. In barbarous times it might 
 have had its utility, and might also have continued 
 useful, had it been exercised according to the common 
 rules of humanity and justice. Unfortunately no earthly 
 throne was ever stained with more crime than the papal 
 chair, no judgment-seat gave more iniquitous verdicts, 
 no philosopher and logician united ever uttered dogmas 
 more absurd. It pleaded the same prescriptive right to 
 rule the thoughts of men that kings put forth to rule 
 their actions; and both were allowed by man's igno- 
 rance or inertness as long as such pretensions galled him
 
 1520. HOSTILITY TO PAPAL DOMINION. 227 
 
 not. In all ages, however, were spirits found to call this 
 authority in question. Around the northern shores of 
 the Mediterranean especially, traditions of the greater 
 freedom of the primitive church were preserved. In 
 Spain we find the doctrine of the real presence denied 
 almost as soon as it was promulgated. In Provence a 
 sect existed for centuries unnoticed, who held tenets 
 anterior and opposed to those of Rome. We have seen 
 the creed of the unfortunate Albigenses extinguished in 
 blood : England had its Lollards : the higher classes 
 of society when they flung off their respect for Rome 
 sunk into atheism and unbelief; for the accusations 
 against the Templars cannot be considered as totally 
 void of foundation : and it is recorded that Italy, 
 uniting congenial extremes, produced frequent instances 
 of unbelief in high places, even in the very chair of St. 
 Peter, by the side of a bigoted and credulous faith, 
 which it is trite but not unjust to call idolatry. 
 
 As civilisation advanced, the moral power and au- 
 thority of the popes gradually declined. The long 
 schism, and the lives and characters of the pontiffs, with 
 many analogous circumstances, contributed to this. And 
 later popes, by endeavouring to supply the loss of moral 
 power by the acquisition of temporal authority, aggravated 
 the growing disrespect for the Holy See. At the be- 
 ginning of the sixteenth century France was, perhaps, 
 the country most in advance with respect to views of 
 reform. Though the fate of the Albigenses warned 
 men from absolute schism, still all classes showed a dis- 
 trust and enmity towards Rome. The commons remon- 
 strated against the pope s usurpations ; the nobles and 
 even the national clergy joined in the sentiment ; and 
 the monarch, instead of dreading excommunication, was 
 never more popular than in warring against the papal 
 power. Louis XII., the father of his people, had struck 
 a medal to perpetuate his own and the nation's abhor- 
 rence of papal bad faith. Its circumscription was, 
 Perdam Babylonia nomen, " I will destroy the very 
 name of Babylon." It served as a motto afterwards 
 Q 2
 
 228 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1521. 
 
 for Luther, who thus borrowed his anathema against 
 Rome from the Most Christian King. 
 
 The papal tree was then like the vine, it bore fruit only 
 at its extremities. While the pontiff was warring at 
 home with the Colonnas, and his imperial city itself 
 was sacked by Bourbon ; while France refused her 
 annates, and was jealous even of the presence of a legate; 
 the emissaries of Rome were collecting tribute round 
 the shores of the Baltic. A monk who came to vend 
 billets of salvation for crowns would have been received 
 in France with a shout of derision : in Germany, on 
 the contrary, he found a large market of credulity. In- 
 dulgences professing to remit all punishments in this 
 world and the next, and consequently efficient to save the 
 souls of the living or the dead, were disposed of in 
 thousands. The avarice of the popes was still greater 
 than the credulity of the Germans. Martin Luther 
 called in question the efficacy of these indulgences ; 
 and his word, like a talisman, broke the spell of Romish 
 supremacy. 
 
 To enter at large into this event and its causes belongs 
 to the historian of Germany. Luther published his 
 celebrated propositions in 1517- In 1521 they were 
 condemned by the Sorbonne, the preamble of whose 
 censure declares, " that flames and not reasoning ought 
 to be employed against the arrogance of Luther." And 
 what is more singular, the jurists of the parliament were 
 equally zealous for punishing schism by death. The 
 new doctrines came to them blended with democratic 
 principles ; and the parliament, now the court of peers, 
 and reconciled to the aristocracy with which it was 
 almost identified, would hear of no innovations. The 
 king was at first inclined to be tolerant. He was a 
 patron and lover of letters, and of learned men ; and 
 as the scholastic theologians hated the revivers and cul- 
 tivators of learning equally with the Lutherans, and 
 confounded both under the same name, Francis re- 
 sisted both the parliament and the Sorbonne, and 
 rescued more than one victim from their hands. While
 
 1528. PROTESTANTS PERSECUTED. 229 
 
 he was prisoner in Spain, however, the pope took an 
 opportunity of sending two vicars of the Holy See to 
 pursue heretics ; and a certain Le Clerc, the first martyr 
 of reform in France, was burnt at Metz in 1525. Bri- 
 connet, bishop of Meaux, was at the same time attacked 
 by the parliament as a favourer of heresy. He had 
 attracted to his diocese the men of his time most cele- 
 brated for learning. This was enough to stamp the 
 bishop and those whom he protected as heretics. They 
 were obliged to fly, the celebrated Henry Etienne, or 
 Stephanus, was one of them, and the good bishop him- 
 self never could wipe off the stigma. Margaret, the 
 king's sister, duchess of Alencon, was early imbued with 
 the principles of the reformers. She afterwards became 
 queen of Navarre by her marriage with Henry d'Albret, 
 and it was thus that her descendant Henry IV. was bred 
 a protestant. Her influence with the king, whom she 
 tended in his captivity, preserved the clemency of his 
 disposition, and even was said to have rendered him 
 not disinclined to the reformation. Zuinglius, relying 
 on the general opinion, dedicated one of his works to 
 the French monarch ; and Francis for a long time de- 
 fended both Erasmus and his friend Berquin from the 
 persecuting Beda, the syndic of the Sorbonne. 
 
 The magnanimity and tolerance of Francis abandoned 
 him with his good fortune. The year 1528, in which 
 he despaired of recovering Italy or the advantages lost 
 by the defeat of Pavia, wrought a sensible change in his 
 conduct. He became despondent and careless in poli- 
 tical matters, cruel and morose in temper, more licen- 
 tious, if possible, in his morals, and at the same time 
 ostensibly far more devout and more attentive to the 
 mere offices of religion. He erected images of the 
 Virgin; allowed poor Berquin, whom he had formerly 
 defended, to be burned ; and, notwithstanding the efforts 
 of his sister, who herself was not secure from accusa- 
 tions, he let loose on his people the bloodhounds of per- 
 secution. 
 
 Francis, in these alternate moods of tolerance and 
 Q 3
 
 230 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1530r 
 
 intolerance, acted chiefly according to his humour. 
 Charles never lost sight of policy. The reformation 
 had originated in his dominions ; and its adherents had 
 taken advantage of his absence and his occupation in 
 wars to proceed in its establishment. He now turned 
 his whole attention to the extinction of heresy, not only 
 to please the pope, who had of late become his ally, but 
 to strengthen his own authority. The empire, too, being 
 elective, it was obvious that, should a majority of princes 
 become protestants, the house of Austria would neces- 
 sarily be excluded. Charles showed himself at first 
 lenient. He tried fair means ; those failed, and recourse 
 was had to severity. The protestant doctrines were 
 condemned. The princes professing them formed a 
 league in consequence, called the League of Smalkalde. 
 The emperor was obliged to temporise, and have re- 
 course to tolerance again, hoping to effect by means of 
 a general council what his imperial authority dared not 
 risk. 
 
 The league of Smalkalde naturally sought the alliance 
 of Francis. The French monarch, though unprepared 
 as yet for war, did not refuse clandestine support to that 
 powerful knot of protestants. In order to satisfy the 
 pope and his conscience for thus making the interests of 
 the faith stoop to those of policy, he covered the sin by 
 burning a more than ordinary number of heretics in 
 Paris. He was amazed and angered to find that, in- 
 stead of quenching reform, he had by these means 
 multiplied and emboldened its adherents. When the 
 passions are excited, a near or frequent view of death 
 brings about a contempt rather than a fear of that ine- 
 vitable catastrophe. Execution or slaughter in the mass 
 will always create an indifference to the worst, amount- 
 ing to heroism. Mingle with this the leaven of religious 
 enthusiasm, the pride of suffering for conscience-sake, 
 the strong hope of eternal life and heavenly recompense, 
 and you place at once man and his faith above the power 
 of despot or inquisitor. From this very fact of our 
 mental organisation we may argue, that religious opi- 

 
 1530. LITERATURE PATRONISED. 231 
 
 nions are uncontrollable. But centuries were to elapse 
 ere rulers could learn the expediency of toleration. 
 
 Amidst all these faults Francis gave marks about this 
 time of that love and patronage of letters which forms 
 the redeeming trait of his character. He established 
 the Royal or Trilingual College, as Marot calls it, from 
 the three endowed professorships of Hebrew, Greek, and 
 Latin. To found this institution was less difficult and 
 praiseworthy than to defend it, which Francis did against 
 the envy of the university and of the Sorbonne, whose bigots 
 looked upon the knowledge of Greek as a crime ; upon 
 that of Hebrew as a heresy worthy of the stake. It was 
 in dread of their persecution that Erasmus refused all 
 the invitations and proffers of the king to settle in 
 France. The latter was obliged to be contented with 
 Budseus as his chief counsellor and friend in these 
 matters. 
 
 The same epoch is marked by several improvements 
 in the administration of justice, and by an attempt of 
 Francis to remodel his army after the fashion of the 
 ancients. He ordered the formation of seven legions, 
 one to be raised in each of the great provinces of the 
 kingdom, each legion to consist of 6000 men. But 
 bodies of such unwieldy size were afterwards found 
 unmanageable, and fell into disuse. 
 
 A lasting peace between such rivals as Charles and 
 Francis was not to be expected. Even if the latter 
 could have confined himself to the pursuit of pleasure, 
 to the internal regulation of his kingdom, to the pa- 
 tronage of the arts and letters, for which, after the peace 
 of Cambray, he manifested great regard ; the spirit of 
 Charles, ever restless in the cabinet, could not fail to 
 have provoked him. At one time the emperor sent him 
 a summons, requiring his aid against the Turks, and 
 ending with the accusation that he had called Solyman 
 to invade Europe. Francis was now on the closest 
 terms of alliance with Henry VIII., who was bent on 
 divorcing the emperor's aunt. The French king used 
 all his influence with the pope to procure the necessary 
 Q 4
 
 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1533. 
 
 license for Henry, but was still baffled by the influence 
 of Charles. Clement VII. was the potentate whose 
 alliance was most warmly disputed by the rival sove- 
 reigns. And both assailed the pontiff on a pontiff's 
 weak side, by the offer of aggrandisement to his family. 
 Charles proposed that Clement's niece, Catherine de' 
 Medici should espouse Francis Sforza, duke of Milan; 
 by which means the Medici would necessarily be ever 
 adverse to the claims of the French kings on Milan. 
 Francis, in opposition, offered his second son, Henry, 
 duke of Orleans, as a husband , for Catherine ; and 
 Clement, elated by the honour of an alliance with the 
 royal house of France, exulted at the proposal. The 
 emperor, who knew the proud character of Francis, 
 could not believe that he would sincerely permit his son 
 to ally with such upstarts as the Medici ; and this 
 incredulity neutralised the exertions that he might other- 
 wise have made to obstruct the match. It took place, 
 however, at Marseilles, where Clement and Francis 
 met to honour the ceremonial, and to arrange the con- 
 ditions of their future friendship. One of these, there 
 is no doubt, was the vigorous prosecution and extirpa- 
 tion of heresy. Francis, however, reaped as usual little 
 advantage from the negotiation. He failed to obtain 
 for Henry VIII. the dispensation required, and that 
 impatient monarch broke with the church in conse- 
 quence. Clement himself died in the year following, 
 and was succeeded by Paul III. of the house of Farnese. 
 An event soon after occurred, which was calculated 
 to rouse all the indignation of Francis. He had of 
 course no envoy at the petty court of Sforza, duke of 
 Milan, on whom he could scarcely look with aught save 
 a jealous eye. A man of fortune, named Merveille, set- 
 tled at Milan, where his uncle was chancellor, aspired 
 to the diplomatic dignity of ambassador of France. 
 His uncle, the Milanese chancellor, was equally anxious 
 on this point, and is said to have asked it as a boon of 
 the French king. It was granted. In that age of 
 intrigue Francis could not refuse to have an agent who
 
 1533. FRANCIS PREPARES FOR WAR. 233 
 
 might prove useful at the court of Milan. The cha- 
 racter of ambassador was to be kept a secret ; but Mer- 
 veille, a vain man, betrayed it in every way, and made 
 the most ostentatious display. It came to the ears of 
 the emperor, who instantly fulminated menaces against 
 his creature, Sforza. The latter endeavoured to excul- 
 pate himself. Charles was too well informed, and per- 
 sisted in his resentment. The duke then determined to 
 satisfy him. Merveille had had a quarrel with a Mi- 
 lanese nobleman, who was now urged to attack the 
 ambassador and his suite. The nobleman was killed ; 
 but, in return, Merveille was seized, imprisoned, and 
 without further trial or delay, decapitated. This it may 
 be supposed fully satisfied Charles. Francis felt the 
 full atrocity of the insult. He wrote instantly to all 
 the powers of Europe, and to the emperor. The latter 
 replied by marrying his niece, the princess of Denmark, 
 to Sforza, as if in reward for his zeal. 
 
 The French king from this moment determined upon 
 war. He busied himself in raising money, and in levy- 
 ing and exercising troops. He forebore, however, to 
 commence the attack, while the emperor was engaged 
 in his expedition against the infidels on the coast of 
 Africa. It may be perceived that these rival monarchs 
 were the first who paid attention to the public mind in 
 Europe, the first who propitiated popular opinion, at that 
 time a novel means of support, and stood in awe of its 
 hostility. Charles departed on this distant expedition 
 immediately after the insult offered to Francis in the 
 affair of Merveille. By the enterprise the former hoped 
 to raise his character with the Christian community ; 
 and should Francis, obeying his resentment, make an 
 attack whilst he was absent, there was the reproach at 
 hand, that the French king was always in league with 
 the infidel, and armed in his support. Francis, how- 
 ever, at this crisis fought Charles in the emperor's own 
 politic manner. He himself remained quiet, but by in- 
 trigue and the aid of money he enabled the duke of 
 Wirtemburg to recover his duchy from Charles's bro-
 
 234 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1534. 
 
 ther, the king of the Romans. The duke belonged to 
 the protestant league, and thus the imperial party was 
 doubly weakened in Germany. 
 
 " It was the fate of Francis," says a catholic writer, 
 " to befriend the enemies of his religion." He now 
 aided the Genoese in throwing off the yoke of the duke 
 of Savoy, his uncle, another friend and relative, whom 
 Francis had contrived to alienate from him. And it 
 was the freedom of Geneva that spread far and wide 
 through France the principles of reform. Those prin- 
 ciples or tenets had hitherto been confined in that king- 
 dom to men of letters, whose studies and consequent 
 exercise of reason at once unveiled the absurdities of 
 Rome, and to personages of influence, whose taste led 
 them to patronise learning. Thus Meaux under its 
 enlightened bishop, was truly considered a nest of he- 
 resy. Thus Stephanus, Ramus, and Marot were pro- 
 testants, as were also the ladies of the court, who, from 
 their sex, had more opportunities than men had of 
 knowing the hypocrisy and corruption of the prelates 
 of the church. The queen of Navarre, the king's sister, 
 Renee, duchess of Ferrara, his sister-in-law, even the 
 duchess d'Etampes, his mistress, were all openly de- 
 clared for tolerance, and secretly inclined to the Reform- 
 ation. When Marot, almost the first of French poets, 
 was obliged to quit France for his religious opinions, he 
 took refuge at Ferrara with the duchess. At the same 
 time, a young deacon, whose name Cauvin was ren- 
 dered in Latin Calvinus, though a native of Noyon in 
 Picardy, protected as well as Marot by the queen of 
 Navarre, sought the same place of safety. 
 
 Men of letters and courtly dames, however, personages 
 naturally tranquil, if not timid, were very unfit propa- 
 gators of a new religion ; although, perhaps, if ideas of 
 reform had taken birth in this class of society only, and 
 thus gradually spread lower, their aim might have been 
 effected more gradually indeed, but far more generally. 
 In Germany, however, owing to the state of society and 
 government there, as well as to the character of Luther,
 
 1534. CRUELTY OF FRANCIS. 235 
 
 the appeal was at once made to the popular mind. The 
 class of the burgesses was in that country most numerous 
 and uncontrolled. The emperor was absent. Autho- 
 rity was divided among many princes, some wise and 
 patient enough to hear reason, others grasping at a pre- 
 text for independence, none chained down by policy, as 
 Francis was, to a fixed line of orthodoxy. The people 
 were there at liberty to listen ; and the antipapal doc- 
 trines spread with a rapidity that nothing could check. 
 
 In France, on the contrary, there was no Luther, nor 
 any scope for a Luther. Reform lurked, like a treason- 
 able secret, among a few trembling conspirators. The 
 difference of language prevented the spreading of the 
 popular flame across the Rhine. And if in a few cases 
 an individual or two brought, or caught, or attempted to 
 spread the contagion, the crime was instantly expiated 
 and silenced at the stake. As soon, however, as a town, 
 in which the French language was spoken, and which 
 was situated beyond French authority, became free, as 
 was the case with Geneva, a foyer, as the French say, 
 or a hearth, was found, where the fire might be freely 
 lit and kept burning, so as to send sparks and spread 
 combustion throughout the whole of the neighbouring 
 kingdom. 
 
 On a certain morning in October, 1534, placards ap- 
 peared, abusive of the mass and of the clergy. The 
 eucharist itself was scouted ; a fact which marks the 
 opinions as coming from Switzerland, where Zuinglian 
 tenets prevailed. These placards were affixed to the 
 gates of the castle of Blois, where the king was. In a 
 rage he departed for Paris. Similar placards imme- 
 diately appeared on the pillars of the Louvre. The 
 insult awoke all the monarch's zeal : he ordered a solemn 
 procession, in which he appeared in person. He him- 
 self declared in public, that he would cut off his own 
 arm, or slay his very son, could he suspect either to be 
 infected with heresy ; and he concluded the religious 
 ceremony by burning six heretics, after a new and more 
 cruel fashion than ordinary. On an erect pole another
 
 236 H1STORV OF FRANCE. 1531. 
 
 was transversely balanced. To one end the unfortunate 
 heretic was tied, and a fire lighted under him, into 
 which and out of which he was alternately dipped and 
 raised, that his torments might be sufficiently acute 
 and prolonged.* 
 
 Francis, however, was more hurt in his dignity than in 
 his religious faith, by the insult that had been offered. 
 He had been early warned of the popular and democratic 
 nature of reform, and he hence took a special dislike to 
 the Zuinglian or Swiss reformers. About the very time 
 that the solemn processions and burnings took place in 
 Paris, Francis was inviting Melancthon to that capital, 
 in order to devise some reconciliation between the con- 
 tending parties. No doubt this was partly to conciliate 
 the protestant league, on whose alliance Francis de- 
 pended. But from the letter, which the king himself 
 wrote to Melancthon so late as June, 1 535, it is evident 
 that his opposition to reform was moderate and en- 
 lightened ; and that when he persecuted, it was more 
 from heat and haste of temper than from settled bi- 
 gotry. 
 
 Whatever were the motives or principles of Francis, 
 he forwarded the cause of reform in France by aiding 
 Geneva to throw off the yoke of Savoy, certainly more 
 than he could check it by edicts or condemnations. Ge- 
 neva gained its liberty about 1534. No sooner was it 
 independent than the city renounced its allegiance to 
 Rome. Farel became its minister of religion ; and he 
 appointed Calvin as his coadjutor. A squabble about 
 the communion having disturbed that solemn ceremony 
 at Easter, both ministers were banished from the town. 
 But Calvin, who was equally eloquent with tongue and 
 with pen, was the very person needed by a rising sect 
 as a defender and a guide. He had courage, zeal, and 
 learning. Educated at one time for the church, and at 
 a later period for the law, he united the information re- 
 quisite for both professions. He had travelled, and seen 
 
 * Francis issued a decree at this time, condemning those who concealed 
 heretics as themselves guilty of heresy, and promising one fourth of the 
 confiscated property of heretics to the informer.
 
 15J1. CALVIN RECALLED TO GENEVA. 237 
 
 two courts ; had been the friend of the queen of Xa- 
 varre and of the duchess of Ferrara; and was much 
 more fitted than Luther to be the effective preacher of 
 a new doctrine to civilised France. He was soon re- 
 called to Geneva, where he succeeded in establishing 
 that form of religion which bears his name, and which 
 soon spread from thence over the greater part of his 
 native kingdom. 
 
 The enmity of the duke of Savoy proved a serious 
 obstacle to Francis. He could no longer penetrate to 
 Milan, without subduing that duchy. In the summer 
 of 1525, the admiral, de Brion, attacked Savoy, and 
 took several towns, while the duke in vain summoned 
 the emperor to his assistance. When the French, how- 
 ever, had reached the summit of the Alpine ridge, tidings 
 were brought of the death of Francis Sforza. The king 
 was thus left without an object of vengeance. His rights 
 to Milan revived also : he had waved them but in fa- 
 vour of Sforza, who had recently died without offspring. 
 Francis, indeed, did not claim the duchy for himself, 
 but for his second son, who, by his mother Claude, was 
 descended from Louis XII. and Valentine Visconti. 
 He hoped by putting forward his second son, rather 
 than the dauphin, to remove all jealousy in the Italians, 
 who would dislike to see Milan attached to the dominion 
 of France. 
 
 An ambassador was sent to the emperor, claiming the 
 investiture of Milan for Henry duke of Orleans. That 
 prince, without an idea of granting the request, hesitated 
 to refuse it altogether ; and, practising the subterfuges, 
 the forms, and delays of the papal court, wasted months 
 in negotiating, whilst he was all the time arming and 
 making preparations of a hostile character. Francis, 
 on his side, pushed the war in Piedmont, took Turin, 
 and encamped before Vercelli, hesitating to break openly 
 with the emperor, or invade his dominions. Charles 
 was in the mean time cajoling the French ambassadors, 
 and leading them to hope for the grant of Milan to the 
 duke of Orleans. In expectation of this they attended
 
 238 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1535. 
 
 him from Naples to Rome. There in full consistory, 
 not only before the pope and cardinals, but in the 
 presence of the public he would allow no one to be 
 excluded the emperor at once threw off dissimulation, 
 and burst forth in furious reproaches against the French 
 king. He recapitulated the whole history of their dif- 
 ferences, his victory, their treaties, the bad faith of 
 Francis, and his tacit enmity ever since he had been 
 guilty of it. With little consistency, he at one moment 
 admitted the possibility of his granting Milan to the 
 duke of Angouleme, third son of the king ; at the next 
 he gave full vent to hig choler, and proposed to fight 
 Francis in single combat, in a boat, or on a bridge, with 
 poniards, in their shirts, offering, at the same time, 
 to stake the duchy of Milan against that of Burgundy on 
 the issue. Not content with this, Charles descended to 
 the meanest and most puerile scolding : " Had I soldiers 
 and generals such as his, I would go with my hands tied, 
 and a rope round my neck, to ask mercy of my anta- 
 gonist." Thus, for the second time, did Charles show 
 that the most politic and strictly controlled temper is apt 
 to fall into the grossest extremes of indecorum and vio- 
 lence when passion is allowed to overpower habitual 
 reserve. 
 
 The ambassadors of France and the ministers of 
 Charles himself were alike astonished at this unexpected 
 gust of reproach. The latter endeavoured to soften and 
 excuse it ; as did Charles himself during a subsequent 
 interview : and the account of it must have been also 
 much softened to Francis, for that prince showed no 
 susceptibility or passion, but replied with coolness and 
 moderation. The negotiations were continued, notwith- 
 standing a scene so well calculated to put a stop to them, 
 but, as may be supposed, they proved ineffectual. 
 
 The causes of the previous dissimulation and sudden 
 arrogance of Charles now became manifest. The army 
 of De Leyva, that had hitherto been inferior to the 
 French, was, during these delays, augmented by rein- 
 forcements to 50,000 men. The admiral was obliged
 
 1536. CHARLES INVADES FRANCE. 239 
 
 to retire before it. Charles was puffed up with pride, 
 and certain of success. He determined on invading 
 France, which he had vague hopes of conquering. As 
 to Provence, at which he immediately aimed, he already 
 looked upon that part of the kingdom as his. 
 
 At the same time, Charles exerted himself with his 
 usual activity to blacken his rival in public opinion. In 
 Italy he accused him as the enemy of the church ; in 
 Germany he aggravated his burning of protestants, and 
 with such success, that Francis could not raise a single 
 lansquenet in that country. Switzerland, now in a great 
 measure protestant, was no longer to be regarded as a 
 school of mercenary soldiers ; and the French king, 
 though he congratulated himself on his own foresight in 
 the establishment of national legions, had as yet but 
 little confidence in this untried infantry. 
 
 Francis therefore repressed his own natural impe- 
 tuosity, and determined not to hazard a battle. Pied- 
 mont was evacuated, except Turin and a few towns 
 intrusted to the marquis of Saluces. He may be enu- 
 merated among the early friends of the king, who now 
 proved faithless to him. In this instance historians do 
 not discover the cause in the conduct of Francis : the 
 marquis, a believer in astrology, had reason to conclude 
 from the stars that the fortunes of France were on the 
 decline. He therefore deserted to the emperor, and be- 
 trayed, as far as lay in his power, the trust reposed in 
 him. Annebaut, however, still defended Turin. Con- 
 trary to the advice of his ablest generals, Charles resolved 
 to pursue his conquests and march into France. Even 
 the veteran De Leyva flung himself from the chair, to 
 which the gout confined him, and fell at the feet of his 
 sovereign to dissuade him ; but in vain. That monarch 
 was, in his own imagination, an emperor of ancient 
 Rome, and, like the original Caesar, marched to subdue 
 Gaul. In order to preserve the analogy, he drew up his 
 troops on passing the Alps, and harangued them after 
 the forms exemplified in the Latin historians. 
 
 Montmorency was intrusted by Francis with the de-
 
 240 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1.")"iG. 
 
 fence of Provence. That noble soldier, who had hitherto 
 given ample proofs of valour, now resolved to act the 
 part of Fabius. He formed a strong camp below Avig- 
 non, at the confluence of the Rhine and the Durance. 
 He ordered all the open country to be laid waste, and 
 the smaller towns to be dismantled; Avignon itself, 
 Aries, and Marseilles, being the only places garrisoned 
 and defended. This order was executed most mercilessly ; 
 and the towns which resisted the general's orders of de- 
 vastation were stormed by their own troops and destroyed. 
 Even Aix, the capital of Provence, was not spared. The 
 emperor proceeded through the desolate country, harassed 
 by the peasantry, but unable to meet with the army of 
 his enemy. He advanced to Marseilles and to Aries, 
 and showed an inclination to besiege those towns. But 
 he was repulsed from Marseilles ; and his rear-guard, 
 commanded by the duke of Alva, was severely handled. 
 At Aries he had no better success. 
 
 Francis was in the mean time at Valence with a part 
 of his forces. Bad tidings were arriving day after day 
 from the north. The town of Guise had been taken. 
 The imperialists were making progress on the deserted 
 frontier. A family disaster occurred about the same 
 time to oppress Francis. His eldest son, the dauphin, 
 died, having taken a draught of cold water when heated 
 with a game at ball : poison, however, was loudly 
 declared to be the cause ; even the emperor was accused 
 of a crime that could bring him no advantage. Cathe- 
 rine de' Medici, wife of the king's second son, who now 
 became dauphin, was also accused, with more plausibility, 
 but on no stronger proof. 
 
 The success of Montmoreucy's plan of defence, and 
 the retreat of the emperor, brought consolation to 
 Francis. The duke of Orleans, now dauphin, begged 
 permission to repair to the camp at Avignon. When 
 he arrived there, it required all JVfontmorency's firmness 
 to prevent the French youth with the prince at their 
 head from sallying out to give battle to Charles. Francis 
 himself came to Avignon some time afterwards. Charles
 
 1537- FRANCIS CLAIMS FLANDERS AND ARTOIS. 241 
 
 was then in full rout, retreating along the shores of the 
 Mediterranean, his way strewn with dead bodies (for 
 pestilence had begun to thin his ranks), and also with 
 horses, arms, baggage, and all the wreck of a ruined 
 army. Francis could not take advantage of his enemy's 
 discomfiture. He was recalled to the north by the 
 danger of Peronne, then besieged by the count of 
 Nassau, and defended by De la Mark, mareschal de 
 Fleuranges. The valour of the mareschal obliged the 
 enemy to raise the siege ; but this gallant knight and 
 soldier did not long survive : he died, leaving behind 
 him those chivalric memoirs of the reign of Francis 
 which bear his name. The emperor in the mean time 
 continued his retreat : he had lost the better part of his 
 army, and De Leyva himself amongst other generals. 
 Charles instantly embarked for Spain to conceal his mor- 
 tification from the Italians, who had so lately witnessed 
 his arrogance and heard his bravadoes. 
 
 Francis had not replied to the insolence and vituper- 
 ation of the emperor. The defence he made was indeed 
 the best answer. The next campaign, 1537, was 
 opened or preceded by a scene correspondent to the 
 public invective of Charles in the Roman consistory. 
 The French king held a bed of justice, or solemn sitting 
 of parliament, in which his advocate, allowing the ces- 
 sion that Francis had made of his suzerainty over 
 Flanders and Artois, argued and declared that such ces- 
 sion was nuU ; that the monarch had not the power to 
 forego the rights of his crown, and that Charles was in 
 consequence the vassal of the king of France for those 
 provinces. This being established to the satisfaction of 
 the court, Charles, as a refractory and disobedient vassal, 
 was summoned to appear and answer for his conduct ; 
 and on his non-appearance, Flanders and Artois wtie 
 declared forfeited to the crown, an empty mimicry of 
 the forms by which in a ruder age Philip Augustus 
 thought fit to sanction those acquisitions, made by the 
 sword. 
 
 Francis attempted to follow this part of the example
 
 242 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1537- 
 
 also, and marched into Flanders, as if to fulfil the decree 
 of his court. He at first met with some success, and 
 afterwards, by a blunder of his own in impatiently 
 raising his camp, lost the advantage. His enemies laid 
 siege to Therouenne. Montmorency and the dauphin 
 were marching to its relief, when the queen-dowager of 
 Hungary, sister of the emperor and regent of the Ne- 
 therlands, proposed a truce. It was concluded in July, 
 but was confined to the northern frontiers of France. 
 In Piedmont the interests of the king were forgotten in 
 the dissensions of the Italian generals, whom he found it 
 necessary to employ. One of these having been assailed 
 by a libel of the notorious Aretino, attributed it to the 
 malignity of the other ; a challenge and dire feuds were 
 the consequence. The marquis of Saluces met the fate 
 he merited for his treachery. He was slain by a shot 
 from a window of the castle of Carmagnola. The way 
 in which his death was avenged is characteristic of the 
 marquis del Guasto, the Spanish general. When the 
 gallant garrison of Carmagnola surrendered, the marquis 
 expressed the greatest admiration for their valour, espe- 
 cially he added for those who defended a certain win- 
 dow. " For my part," exclaimed a soldier, " I was 
 there, and fired many a shot." Del Guasto ordered 
 him instantly to be hanged up to the window. Those 
 Italian wars altogether corrupted the high honour and 
 generosity of the ancient Spanish character. The Ita- 
 lians themselves, in consequence of their unfixed and 
 divided rule, their ever-changing allegiance, and the 
 petty warfare of intrigue, incessant amongst them, had 
 deteriorated in character ; and the Spaniards adopting 
 the lax morals and contempt of honour which they here 
 found, and which their command of mercenary troops, 
 as well as their own subjection and service to an astute 
 and politic sovereign increased, compounded their own 
 pride with other bad qualities, and formed a character 
 as depraved as history can well paint. When in course 
 of time 1C imbibed the zeal of religious persecutions, i 
 became truly demoniacal. Pescara and Del Guasto
 
 1538. MEETING OF FRANCIS AXD CHARLES. 243 
 
 united perfidy with cruelty, but in both respects the 
 name of Alva was destined soon to eclipse theirs. 
 
 During the following year the truce was extended to 
 Piedmont, each party guarding what they held. Charles, 
 in addition to his ill success, his total want of funds, 
 and the rapid progress of the reformation among the 
 German states, while war prevented the emperor from 
 checking or interfering with them, was induced to 
 treat by the alliance which Francis had newly formed 
 with the Turks. Those barbarians, flushed with recent 
 conquest, were the terror of eastern Europe ; and Hun- 
 gary was already in their power. In these circumstances 
 the pope undertook to mediate a peace. Both sovereigns 
 joined the pontiff at Nice. They refused to see each 
 other, and it was found impossible to fix the terms of a 
 treaty ; but a truce for ten years was proclaimed in July, 
 1538. Charles, while at Nice, was so full of suspicions, 
 that he lodged on board his galley. He now sailed in 
 it for Barcelona, but being driven by the wind upon the 
 coast of Provence, he sent a messenger to Francis, de- 
 siring an interview. A little reflection had calmed his 
 resentment and removed his mistrust ; and it is pro- 
 bable that Charles already began to meditate that passage 
 through France, which he soon afterwards made. A 
 personal interview with Francis could best inform him 
 as to the prudence of such a step. The French king 
 hastened at Charles's invitation to meet and to welcome 
 him. The monarchs met at Aigues Mortes, visited 
 each other, forgot their mutual quarrels, insults, chal- 
 lenges, and hate. Francis even consented to receive 
 Andrew Doria, and the good nature of the monarch 
 showed itself when he said, " Here we are united, 
 my brother the emperor and' I. We must henceforth 
 have the same friends and the same enemies ; we must 
 equip together a naval armament against the Turks, and 
 you, Doria, shall have the command." 
 
 On his return to Compiegne, Francis was taken dan- 
 gerously ill, of the same malady, it is said, which after- 
 wards occasioned his death. He gradually recovered, 
 R 2
 
 244 . HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1541. 
 
 however, from this attack. Early in 1539, the people 
 of Ghent applied to him, offering to become his subjects. 
 Those turbulent citizens were meditating a revolt 
 against the emperor. They complained of certain war- 
 taxes, that had nevertheless been voted by their repre- 
 sentatives in the states of Flanders, refused to pay them, 
 and defied the emperor's authority. Francis, it might 
 be thought, would have eagerly embraced such an op- 
 portunity to annoy his rival. Peace, however, had been 
 just concluded, and Charles had evidently made many 
 fair promises at Aigues Mortes ; besides, the chivalric 
 Francis detested the burgesses, as a class of whose turbu- 
 lence and fickleness he had full experience in the Ge- 
 noese. In lieu, therefore, of encouraging the malcon- 
 tents, he at once conveyed intelligence of their intrigue 
 to the emperor. 
 
 That prince, anxious to crush the rebellion at Ghent 
 ere it spread or gathered force, was perplexed how 
 to get thither, an embarrassment which strongly demon- 
 strates the absurdity of scattered dominion. If he 
 went by sea, he feared the ports of England and of 
 Flanders, both hostile. By land, through his own do- 
 minions, the protestant states of Germany, equally 
 unfriendly to him, were to be traversed. Through 
 France lay the shortest path ; and Charles, on receiving 
 the amicable warning of Francis, no longer hesitated. 
 Resorting to his usual bait, he sent to promise the in- 
 vestiture of Milan to the king's second son, and at the 
 same time asked permission to pass through France : it 
 was of course granted. The two princes and Montmo- 
 rency met the emperor at Bayonne. Francis himself 
 advanced as far as Chatelherault in Poitou to receive 
 him, and magnificent festivals celebrated their entry 
 into each town : that given at Paris excelled every thing 
 of the kind in splendour. The prisoners were every 
 where liberated at the emperor's approach. In the 
 midst of all this gaiety, the mind of Charles was ill at 
 ease. Francis was counselled by many to retain the 
 emperor till he fulfilled his promise of granting Milan ; 

 
 15-1-1. CHARLES'S CONDUCT AT GHENT. 245 
 
 at least till that promise was solemnly renewed in 
 writing. But Francis scorned to take so base an ad- 
 vantage, and Montmorency was firm in the same honour- 
 able opinion. The latter was now constable of the 
 kingdom, and possessed the chief influence with the 
 king. A soldier of high honour himself, he coincided 
 with his master in placing implicit reliance on the 
 emperor's word. 
 
 " Do you see that fair lady?" said Francis, pointing 
 out to Charles the duchess d'Etampes : " she advises 
 me not to let you depart from Paris until you have 
 revoked the treaty of Math-id." The emperor was at 
 first disconcerted, but rallied, and replied coolly, " If 
 the advice is good, it should be followed." Charles, ne- 
 vertheless, contrived, on the following day, to let fall a 
 diamond ring at the feet of the duchess; and when she 
 picked it up, and proffered it to him, he obliged her to 
 retain it. 
 
 Triboulet, the court fool of Francis, set down Charles 
 on his tablets as one of his own class, for risking to 
 pass through France. "But if I let him pass?" observed 
 Francis. " Then," said Triboulet, " I will rub out his 
 name, and write yours in its place, as the most egregious 
 fool of any." 
 
 Francis acted the noble part, and refrained from press- 
 ing for the Milanese till Charles had reached his own 
 frontier ; and then the affair of Ghent was so pressing, 
 that the emperor had time to think of no other. Mont- 
 morency was obliged to return with this excuse. Charles 
 reaped all the benefit he could expect from his speedy 
 movements. The people of Ghent were terrified, and 
 submitted. It was supposed that he would spare his 
 native city. He entered it, however, and on his very 
 birthday, with no feelings of clemency : twenty-six of 
 the ringleaders were put to death. All the ancient pri- 
 vileges and rights of Ghent were abrogated, and a fort- 
 ress was raised to keep the town in subjection. So much 
 had municipal and kingly power changed their relative 
 situations in little more than a century. 
 B 3
 
 246 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1542. 
 
 No sooner was this triumph gained, than Charles threw 
 off the mask, and not only refused to keep his promise 
 as to the Milanese with Francis, but denied that he had 
 ever made it. He even endeavoured to take a base 
 advantage of the friendly and cordial reception given to 
 him by that monarch. Venice had been, of all the 
 powers of Italy, the staunch friend of France. The mar- 
 quis del Guasto now represented to the Venetians the 
 firm alliance between Charles and Francis, and accord- 
 ingly pressed them to join the emperor against the 
 Turks. But the wary Venetians put no faith in the re- 
 conciliation of the two monarchs, and were deaf to all 
 the proffers of del Guasto. In order to counteract this 
 intrigue, Francis despatched as ambassadors Fregose and 
 Rincon, the former to Venice, the latter to Constantino- 
 ple ; to explain to both courts, that although the emperor 
 had visited Paris, yet so far was this from being a sign 
 of strict alliance, that it had rather, through the bad 
 faith of Charles, produced a contrary effect. Del Guasto 
 resolved to intercept those ambassadors, hoping to dis- 
 cover all the views of Francis in their despatches : lie 
 expected also to find, in that addressed to the sultan, a 
 document which, if published, would disgrace Francis 
 in the eyes of Christian Europe. The ambassadors were 
 accordingly waylaid, by order of del Guasto, as they de- 
 scended the Po in a bark, and murdered. 
 
 When Francis exclaimed against this fresh outrage, 
 the emperor justified del Guasto for the deed. The 
 former could find no retribution but in declaring war, 
 which accordingly ensued in 1542. Before entering 
 upon its details, let us cast a glance at the intrigues and 
 revolutions of the court. The dauphin Henry, not con- 
 tent with his wife, Catherine de' Medici, had followed 
 his father's example, in selecting and supporting a mis- 
 tress. Catherine was young, accomplished, and not un- 
 lovely. Henry preferred a lady (Diana of Poictiers) old 
 enough to be his mother. Great rivalry arose between 
 the king's mistress and the prince's mistress, an exem- 
 plary and edifying emulation ! The duchess d'Etampes
 
 1542. DISGRACE OP THE ADMIRAL. 247 
 
 sliglitingly observed, that she was only born on the day 
 that Diana was married; and the insult was not forgiven. 
 The former felt that at the death of Francis she must 
 suffer the resentment of his successor. She therefore 
 sought to create a friend and supporter in the duke of Or- 
 leans, next brother to the king ; and she intrigued and 
 corresponded with the emperor, to procure for him an 
 independent appanage either in Milan or in the Low 
 Countries. 
 
 These intrigues of the duchess d'Etampes, but par- 
 tially known to history, were no doubt one of the causes 
 of the tergiversation of the emperor respecting the so 
 much debated investiture. The court was thus broken 
 into two parties; the king, his mistress, De Brion, and 
 others, on one side; the dauphin, with Diana, supported 
 by the constable Montmorency, on the other. Just be- 
 fore the war broke out, Montmorency fell into disgrace, 
 through the play of this intrigue. Historians have attri- 
 buted that misfortune to his advice of letting Charles go 
 free; but such a reason is improbable and insufficient. 
 He was exiled to Chantilly; a palace of which the 
 princely splendour has been attested by lord Herbert of 
 Cherbury. 
 
 The temper of Francis became much soured at this 
 time. He was worn down by a malady, under which he 
 pined without hopes of cure; and in his treatment of 
 friends, as well as of religious dissidents, he approached 
 somewhat to the savage disposition of Henry VIII. Not 
 only Montmorency was now disgraced, but Chabot, ad- 
 miral de Brion, an especial favourite, and the friend of 
 the duchess d'Etampes, was imprisoned for a trifling 
 crime. It seems as if a sense of impartiality actuated 
 Francis to humble one of each party a friend of either 
 mistress. Poor De Brion, more sensitive than Montmo- 
 rency, died under his disgrace, and Francis was afflicted 
 at his fate. The monarch granted him the vain repar- 
 ation of a splendid tomb. The vengeance of the duchess 
 d'Etampes fell upon Poyet the chancellor, who had been 
 inveterate against De Brion. The king, however, whose 
 R 4
 
 248 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1542. 
 
 conscience smote him for having abstracted cle Brion 
 from his rightful judges in parliament, and sent him 
 before a commission, would not suffer the same injustice 
 to be done to Poyet. He was tried for malversation, and 
 condemned to five years' imprisonment, and a fine so 
 considerable, that it stripped him of all his wealth. The 
 cardinal of Lorraine, brother of Guise, at the same time 
 lost his credit. Francis seemed to have conceived a dis- 
 gust against all his old friends. In his present stern and 
 serious mood he could not tolerate the license and rapa- 
 city which he had formerly encouraged. 
 
 The persons now intrusted by Francis with the man- 
 agement of his affairs were d'Annebaut, recently created 
 admiral, and the cardinal de Tournon. Their probity is 
 unimpeached, but their talents were unfortunately me- 
 diocre. The war languished in Piedmont. Conquests 
 in Italy were considered unlucky; and it was resolved to 
 attack Roussillon in the south and Luxembourg in the 
 north. Charles, as he had subdued Tunis at the com- 
 mencement of the last war with France, now led an ex- 
 pedition against Algiers, either to show his contempt for 
 the king, or to prove his greater zeal in the cause of 
 Christianity. It strikes me that both enterprises were 
 owing to a superstitious desire to earn, by defeating the 
 infidels, a store of merit and good fortune, to be ex- 
 pended in the war with France. The expedition, how- 
 ever, proved unfortunate : Charles lost his fleet, his 
 artillery, and a great portion of his army. His brother 
 Ferdinand, king of the Romans, was at the same time 
 equally unsuccessful against the Turks in Hungary. 
 
 Notwithstanding the low state to which the emperor's 
 affairs were thus reduced, the French arms made little 
 progress. The dauphin commanded the expedition 
 against Roussillon. His brother, the duke of Orleans, 
 supported by the duke de Guise and the count d'En- 
 ghien, entered the province of Luxembourg, which they 
 over-ran and conquered. But hearing on a sudden that 
 a battle was to be fought in the south, the young prince 
 abandoned the army, and weakened it in his haste to
 
 1542. BURTHENSOME TAXATION. 249 
 
 participate in the triumphs of his brother. It was a false 
 report. The dauphin, instead of vanquishing, was 
 obliged to raise the siege of Perpignan, and Luxembourg 
 was reconquered by the imperialists. The brothers, du 
 Bellay, one of whom wrote the history of these wars, 
 alone supported the credit of the royal arms in Pied- 
 mont. 
 
 The effects of these great efforts of the king to sustain 
 the war against so potent an adversary became evident 
 in the discontents of his people, produced by the pres- 
 sure of extraordinary taxes. The English reader can- 
 not have failed to remark how the power of levying taxes 
 fell into the hands of the sovereign. It was under 
 Charles VII., the king who reconquered France from the 
 English, that the taille became perpetual, as a war-tax. 
 The gabelle, an impost on salt, the aides, a kind of ex- 
 cise, grew in the same manner to be under the control 
 of the king, who raised them at pleasure. Francis in- 
 creased all these taxes to an extent which it is difficult 
 to ascertain : and this revenue not meeting his expenses, 
 he borrowed large sums, and sold many of the domains 
 of the crown. The gabelle, or salt-tax, was, however, 
 what pressed most heavily on the people j not only by 
 reason of the dearness of that necessary of life, but 
 also through the vexations practised by the collectors 
 and overseers, a tribe ever hateful to the people. The 
 provinces in which salt was raised had hitherto enjoyed 
 various advantages : they exported it duty-free to other 
 countries ; and as the tax was raised on the sale, not on 
 the production of the commodity, the inhabitants of 
 those parts could easily secure a store sufficient for their 
 own consumption without paying the duty. Francis, 
 however, ordered that the tax should be levied at the 
 raising or making of the salt. The sufferers were indig- 
 nant ; and those of llochelle, who considered this an in- 
 fringement of their privileges, rebelled. Francis did 
 not lose a moment in marching to put down this insur- 
 rection ere it gained ground. He appeared with an 
 army of lansquenets before Rochellej and the town sub-
 
 250 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1545. 
 
 mitted. The king was at that time engaged in rivalry 
 with the emperor Charles, who had drawn down upon 
 himself the condemnation of Europe by his harsh treat- 
 ment of the people of Ghent. Francis, therefore, obe- 
 dient to this policy, as well as to the natural generosity 
 of his temper, pardoned the insurgents of llochelle. 
 " Speak no more of revolt,"* said he, to the humbled and 
 penitent citizens : " forget it, as I do. I see here none 
 but my children ; in me you behold a father. My rival 
 may spill the blood of his unfortunate subjects of Ghent: 
 it is a pleasure worthy of him. My delight, on the con- 
 trary, is to recover the hearts of my subjects." Here 
 was one signal benefit produced by the progress of civil- 
 isation, and the communication of events throughout 
 Europe. The cruelty, and consequent unpopularity of 
 one monarch, served as a beacon to warn the other, and 
 direct him into the path of clemency. 
 
 The campaign of 1 543 brought Francis another enemy 
 and another ally : the enemy was Henry VIII., whose 
 natural hatred to France rose in proportion as its mo- 
 narch proved victorious. The two kings had not been 
 friends since the affair of Catherine's di vorce ; but the 
 receipt of a pension from France, under the treaty of 
 1 525, as well as the mortal quarrel between Henry and 
 the emperor, preserved the former from openly breaking 
 with Francis. Nevertheless the marriage of James 
 king of Scotland with a princess of France was felt 
 sorely by Henry's jealous temper. When this princess 
 died, James was allowed to espouse another lady of 
 royal blood, Mary of Lorraine. This was a new griev- 
 ance. The Tudors, at least Henry VIII. and his 
 daughter Elizabeth, were peculiarly jealous of any one 
 who sought the happiness of marriage ; such an event 
 always caused them a pang. When a rival or an enemy 
 met with good fortune in a match, their envy was sure 
 to vent itself in hostility. Henry could not forgive 
 Francis his alliance with Scotland, and his patronage of 
 its young king ; and when the pension to England 
 ceased to be paid, owing to the necessities of the French
 
 THE ENGLISH JOIN THE IMPERIALISTS. 251 
 
 monarch, another tie of interest was converted into an 
 hostile claim. Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn 
 were both dead by this time, and thus were removed the 
 obstacles to an alliance between Henry and the emperor. 
 It was concluded. They agreed to announce it to Fran- 
 cis, by summoning him, in the face of Europe, to give 
 up his odious alliance with the Turk. 
 
 Ten thousand English came to swell the army of the 
 emperor in Flanders. With these he crushed the duke 
 of Cleves, who had espoused the side of Francis, and 
 who was to have received in marriage the hand of 
 Jeanne d'Albret, heiress of the crown of Navarre. 
 Francis was either inactive or unfortunate in the support 
 of his friend : the duke was obliged to make the most 
 humble submissions. Charles, after this, advanced and 
 formed the siege of Landrecies, which was stubbornly 
 defended. Francis approached with an army : he was 
 no longer anxious to give battle with the impetuosity of 
 youth ; and, after throwing succours into Landrecies, he 
 retreated. Charles raised the siege ; but, in return, suc- 
 ceeded in surprising the more important town of 
 Cambray. 
 
 It will be recollected that the ambassadors despatched 
 by Francis to Venice and to Constantinople, to explain 
 the hollowness of his reconciliation with the emperor, 
 were intercepted, and slain by del Guasto. A messen- 
 ger was now selected of the most enterprising character, 
 a man calculated to perform the perilous journey and 
 accomplish the difficult negotiation.' He was an adven- 
 turer whom we shall hereafter have occasion to recog- 
 nise as the baron de la Garde. He reached the court of 
 Solyman : after enduring much indignity he obtained a 
 hearing ; exculpated his master ; and induced Solyman 
 to despatch Barbarossa to the coast of Provence. There 
 a junction was formed between the French and Turkish 
 fleets ; and Nice was besieged by them in concert ; but 
 even that insignificant town they failed to take. Francis 
 incurred the dishonour of an alliance with the infidels,
 
 252 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1544. 
 
 without reaping any advantage. Solyman committed 
 some vain and not triumphant ravages as he retreated. 
 
 The army in Piedmont was now intrusted by Francis 
 to the young count d'Enghien : he was brother to An- 
 toine de Bourbon duke de Vendome, afterwards, by his 
 marriage with Jeanne d'Albret, king of Navarre. The 
 count was an active commander, and he continued his 
 operations against del Guasto, the imperialist general, 
 during the whole winter. 
 
 In the spring of 1544, he besieged Carignano. Del 
 Guasto, aware that the French had orders not to fight, 
 marched to its relief. The count instantly despatched 
 Montluc, afterwards mareschal, to court, to obtain the 
 permission of Francis to offer battle. The council de- 
 cided against risking it. Montluc, who was present, 
 showed his impatience at their timidity by all kinds of 
 contortions. The king was amused, and ordered him to 
 speak. The Gascon (Montluc was of Gascony) did so, 
 with a peculiarity of accent and gesture that amused his 
 hearers, and that did not mar his eloquence : he warmly 
 recommended a battle; and Francis, caught by an en- 
 thusiasm once so natural to himself, was won by Mont- 
 luc's zeal, and, despite the dissuasions of his council, sent 
 D'Enghien permission to fight. No sooner was this 
 known than the court became a desert ; every young 
 lord and courtier set out post to Piedmont to share in 
 the perils and the glory of the action. 
 
 The battle was fought at Cerisoles on the 14th of 
 April. The imperialists far outnumbered the French ; 
 but mercenaries composed the greater part of the strength 
 of either army. All the forenoon was spent in the firing 
 of the arquebuss, in manoeuvres, and in vain attempts 
 of either army to turn and take its antagonist in flank. 
 Neither army wished to advance, as each was appre- 
 hensive that by so doing its artillery would be in a mea- 
 sure masked, while itself would be fully exposed to the 
 guns of the enemy. This evinces the immobility of ar- 
 tillery in those days, and the little skill with which it 
 was managed. The French, most impatient of the con-
 
 1544. BATTLE OF CERI SOLES. 253 
 
 tending parties, ordered the Swiss of their centre to ad- 
 vance. They were discouraged by the fire of the 
 artillery ; and the lansquenets, opposed to them in supe- 
 rior numbers, repulsed them. To the left of the Swiss 
 were posted, first the French infantry, and beyond them 
 light troops, either Italians or men of Gruyere. When 
 the centre wavered, the count led the French infantry 
 to its support. The Italians and the men of Gruyere, 
 thus abandoned, turned and fled. And d'Enghien, on 
 looking round, seeing himself deserted, and the enemies 
 advancing in his flank, was in despair. He placed his 
 sword so that he might fall and die upon it. On re- 
 flection, he thought it better to perish by the hand of 
 the enemy : collecting, therefore, an hundred straggling 
 horse, he charged the lansquenets with that desperation 
 which the search of death inspires ; when lo ! before his 
 furious charge, several times repeated, the lansquenets 
 shrunk, became disordered, and at last fled. The fact 
 was, that the rest of the French line had been victorious, 
 and an elevation of the ground had concealed their ad- 
 vantage from d'Enghien. This success was in a great 
 manner owing to an order given in the beginning of the 
 day by del Guasto to the prince of Salerno, to keep 
 back, and not to engage his Italians, in whom the com- 
 manders had little confidence. Del Guasto had lost his 
 presence of mind, and forgot to issue any later order ; 
 through which neglect a great portion of his army re- 
 mained inactive. Indeed, the prince of Salerno with- 
 drew his troops from the field without having struck a 
 blow. Del Guasto fled early, and displayed a consi- 
 derable lack of courage, although Paulus Jovius, of 
 whom he is the hero, represents him as a very Mars. 
 Del Guasto presents the example of a general, able and 
 ingenious in planning and conducting a compaign, but 
 incapable of cool discernment in the heat of action. 
 Since the day of Marignano, victory had been a stranger 
 to the French ; and the count D'Enghien reaped a har- 
 vest of glory by the achievement. Unfortunately the 
 young prince did not live to fulfil the hopes entertained
 
 254 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1544. 
 
 of him. In a year or two afterwards, whilst at la 
 Roche-Guyon, supporting a mock-siege against the 
 dauphin and other young men of the court, a box, in- 
 advertently flung from the window, fell upon him and 
 caused his death. 
 
 Francis was assailed on so many points by so many 
 and such powerful foes, that he could not take advan- 
 tage of the victory of Cerisoles. Twelve thousand men 
 were instantly drawn from the army of d'Enghien, to 
 reinforce those of the north, and no progress was made 
 towards Milan. The emperor and Henry VIII. had 
 agreed, each to lead an army, the one through Cham- 
 pagne, the other through Picardy, straight to Paris, 
 without staying to make conquests or form sieges. The 
 first part of the plan was performed, not the latter. 
 Charles invested St. Dizier, and Henry besieged Bou- 
 logne. Had they executed their original intention, they 
 might have dictated peace to Francis in his capital. 
 The emperor at length perceived his mistake. He 
 marched towards the centre of the kingdom, summoning 
 Henry to do the same. The latter showed no inclin- 
 ation to second him, and still remained before Boulogne, 
 of which he made himself master. 
 
 The emperor had gained possession of St. Dizier by 
 artifice ; for he sent a false order under the seal of the 
 duke of Guise to the commander of the town, ordering 
 him to surrender. Some historians assert that it was 
 the duchess d'Etampes that furnished this means of 
 victory to the emperor, from jealousy to the dauphin. 
 The king, confined to his chamber by illness, was in 
 despair at the capture of St. Dizier. " Ah ! my God," 
 he exclaimed, " how dearly do you sell me my king- 
 dom. Get you to church," he continued, addressing 
 his sister the queen of Navarre, " and there utter for 
 me my prayer to God, that since it is his will to favour 
 the emperor, I may at least be spared the grief of seeing 
 him encamped under the walls of my capital." The 
 dauphin was charged with the defence of Champagne. 
 He took the opportunity of beseeching bis father to
 
 1544. TREATY BETWEEN FRANCIS AND CHARLES. 355 
 
 pardon Montmorency ; observing, that the defender of 
 Provence could best defend Champagne. The request 
 angered, without persuading, the king. The emperor 
 advanced as far as the Marne, which it was his object to 
 cross. He succeeded in seizing the magazines of Eper- 
 nay and Chateau Thierry, owing, it is again asserted, 
 to information derived from the duchess d'Etampes. 
 Paris was in alarm. The king rode about, and endea- 
 voured to re-assure the citizens. " The Lord defend 
 you from fear, my children," said he; " I will defend 
 you from the enemy." 
 
 The emperor's sudden spirit of enterprise had in the 
 mean time given way to his usual habits of caution and 
 delay. Instead of pushing across the Marne, fighting 
 and advancing upon Paris, he retired in search of pro- 
 visions. The heart of Charles having failed him, and 
 the opportunity being at the same time lost, negotiations 
 were willingly entered into by both monarchs. They 
 sent a despatch to Henry, then on the point of cap- 
 turing Boulogne, but he disdainfully refused to join 
 in an accommodation. Charles and Francis, therefore, 
 concluded a separate treaty at Crespy, in September, 
 1544. It chief stipulation was, that the duke of Or- 
 leans should espouse either the daughter or the niece of 
 the emperor, who in return should give as a dowry either 
 the Milanese or the Low Countries. A peace thus ter- 
 minating to the advantage of the duke of Orleans alone, 
 plainly denotes the intrigues and interests of the duchess 
 d'Etampes, who sought, in the lung's second son, a sup- 
 port against the enmity of the dauphin. The delay, 
 however, and the loose manner in which the fulfilment of 
 the terms was secured, showed that the emperor was 
 not sincere ; and at the same time that the king was not 
 a dupe. One desired to retire with impunity ; the 
 other was glad to allow this. The dauphin protested 
 strongly against this treaty, of which he did not perceive 
 the hollowness. 
 
 Between the English, who held Boulogne, and the 
 French, the war still continued, Francis, for the first
 
 256 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1 .'> 14. 
 
 time, made his greatest efforts on a new element. 
 Ordering his Mediterranean galleys to join those of 
 the western ports at Havre, he collected a fleet of 136 
 ships : the king went with his court to behold it put 
 to sea, and gave a banquet on board the largest vessel, 
 one of 800 tons, which accidentally took fire, and was 
 burned ere it quitted the harbour. Annebaut," who, 
 as admiral, commanded the fleet, sailed for the Isle 
 of Wight. The English fleet, amounting to about 
 sixty sail, came out from Portsmouth to cannonade, 
 but avoided an action with such a superior force. The 
 French landed and insulted the English, in order to 
 provoke them to come out ; but failing in this purpose, 
 the fleet sailed back to its own shores. By land they 
 endeavoured to retake Boulogne, but with no better 
 success. In one of the skirmishes near this town, the 
 comte d'Aumale was struck in the face with a javelin, 
 the whole head of which entered between his mouth 
 and nose. His recovery appeared a miracle to the chi- 
 rurgeons of that day. His son, afterwards duke of 
 Guise, was signalised with the appellation of Lc Balafre, 
 for a far more trifling scar. Peace was the result of 
 this campaign. Francis agreed to continue to Henry 
 the usual yearly tribute, and an additional sum was to 
 be paid for Boulogne, which was to be restored to the 
 French after the lapse of eight years. 
 
 The opinions of the reformers in the mean time, 
 though they made progress in France, were not openly 
 avowed. Francis was a popular prince : his clemency 
 at Rochelle, joined to his general character and personal 
 qualities, made him beloved ; and the strong feeling of 
 loyalty, which in Germany promoted religion, in France 
 kept the people from dissenting openly from the faith 
 of the monarch. A few heretics were burned from time 
 to time to grace a festival, or display the zeal of the mo- 
 narch ; but wholesale persecution was as yet unknown. 
 Unfortunately the reign of Francis was at this period 
 stained w T ith the blood of a whole province, wantonly and 
 unjustly spilled. The reader cannot have forgotten the
 
 1515. PERSECUTION OP THE VAUDOIS. 257 
 
 crusades against the Albigenses, those primitive reformers 
 of the thirteenth century. Great as had been the 
 slaughter, they were not all extinct ; and, under the name 
 of Vaudois, the sect subsisted from that day chiefly in 
 the provinces eastward of the Rhone, where the per- 
 secution had been little felt. Forgotten by the inquisitors 
 of the church, that simple people had preserved in their 
 remote valleys their original hatred of Rome, and denial 
 of its most absurd doctrines. They now learned with 
 delight, that a large portion of Europe had awakened to 
 opinions somewhat similar. They enquired for guides, 
 or else missionaries sought them out. Farel visited them 
 from Geneva : they conceded, in deference to his preach- 
 ing, whatever little differences existed between their pri- 
 mitive belief and the modern ideas of reform, and thus 
 became united to the great body of protestantism. 
 
 This communication and religious alliance with fo- 
 reigners awakened the zeal of the parliament of Aix, 
 the capital of Provence. That tribunal, in consequence, 
 condemned the leaders to be burned, the population to 
 be banished, and the town of Merindol, their principal 
 hold, to be destroyed. This decree of the year 1540 
 was not put into effect. The learned Sadolet, who had 
 a diocese in the neighbourhood, and Dubellay, interfered 
 with Francis and stayed the execution. Five years 
 elapsed, and the cardinal de Tournon was in power, a 
 narrow-minded bigot : he pressed the king to, what he 
 considered, the pious and politic act of rooting out 
 heresy ; and Francis, in a moment of zeal, despatched 
 the order. The parliament of Aix were not tardy in 
 fulfilling it. The president, the baron d'Oppede, him- 
 self undertook to direct the massacre. The baron de 
 la Garde, the adventurer so successful in his mission to 
 Constantinople, commanded the troops chosen to execute 
 d'Oppede's bidding. They marched to the banks of 
 the Durance, and the work of devastation began ; the 
 villages were every where set on fire, and the flying po- 
 pulation massacred. Merindol was destroyed. Cahrieres 
 made some resistance : but those who combated and
 
 258 HISTORY OF FHANCK. 151-7. 
 
 those who yielded met with the same inexorable fate. 
 After the conquest, d'Oppede and his assistant set about 
 murdering the captives. They varied the monotony of 
 their horrid task by strangling some, and shutting up 
 others in barns, which were set fire to and burned. 
 AFomen were not more spared than men. With forks 
 and halberds ah 1 were thrust back into the flames who 
 attempted to escape. Three hundred were hanged, and 
 about twice that number spared to man the galleys. 
 Attempts were made to awaken Francis to a sense of 
 these atrocities, but in vain. The conduct of d'Oppede 
 was approved. De Thou indeed says, that Francis, 
 tormented on his death-bed by the recollection, recom- 
 mended his successor to examine into the conduct of 
 the president, and de la Garde. It was the subject of 
 a prolonged enquiry in the subsequent reign ; but a short 
 imprisonment was the only castigation inflicted on the 
 perpetrators. 
 
 About the period of this atrocious massacre, Francis 
 lost his second son, the duke of Orleans, who died of a 
 pestilential fever. He was a youth of gay temper and 
 fascinating manners ; consequently, a favourite with his 
 father. It was to him that the duchy of Milan, or the 
 Low Countries, had been promised in dowry with an 
 Austrian princess at the treaty of Crespy. His death 
 almost annulled that treaty. Francis despatched an 
 embassy to Charles on the occasion, making some fresh 
 demands. " If the king will leave me in peace," replied 
 the emperor, then harassed by the league of the protestant 
 princes, " I will leave him so." 
 
 In the beginning of the year 1547, Francis received 
 tidings of the death of Henry VI 1 1., for whom he had 
 always entertained a friendship, though the jealous tem- 
 per of Henry prevented him from returning it. The 
 French king ordered a magnificent mass to be said 
 for the deceased monarch, although he had died out of 
 the pale of the church. He felt Henry's death to be 
 the forerunner of his own, which now advanced rapidly. 
 Francis tried, like Louis XL, to shun his fate, or at
 
 1547. CHARACTER OF FRAXCIS I. 259 
 
 least to dissipate his chagrin,by frequent change of scene, 
 and by the amusement of the chase. Whilst he was re- 
 turning to St. Germain, his malady suddenly grew worse 
 at Rambouillet, where he died on the 3 1 st day of March, 
 1547- His last counsel to his son was, to lighten the 
 burden of taxes, and to beware of the ambition of the 
 Guises. 
 
 Francis I. was remarkable for a large and noble per- 
 son. The qualities of his mind corresponded. He was 
 brave, generous, confident, splendid in his tastes, gallant 
 in his pleasures. He was warm hearted ; his devoted- 
 ness as a son, his attachment as a friend, partook of 
 tenderness. The same frank and undissembling temper 
 that bound to him those he loved, made speedy enemies 
 of those whom he disliked. Although prodigal and 
 unfortunate as well as despotic, he was still a popular 
 king ; a distinction which he owed to the neiy spring of 
 loyalty that now actuated men's minds, as well as to his 
 own personal character, of which the failings were as 
 amiable as the virtues. He was a fair type of his age, 
 the ideal of its perfection. He forms the point and 
 marks the epoch in which chivalry and gentility meet, 
 the former subsiding gradually into the latter. 
 
 Some writers accuse Francis of being an aristocratic 
 king; whilst others, his own contemporaries, accuse him 
 of sacrificing the aristocracy to favouritism. The fact 
 is, Francis was opposed to an oligarchy, or to a few 
 high, powerful chiefs. Past history, as well as the 
 revolt of Bourbon, gave him a natural dislike to this 
 kind of cabal, for which reason he exiled Montmorency, 
 as eager to grasp at power, and bade his son to beware of 
 the Guises. But the institution of a wide aristocracy 
 was what Francis loved, the class of noble as distin- 
 guished from that of base. It was he who drew the 
 strong line between these castes, less marked before, on 
 account of the gradations which rank and birth filled 
 from the lowest to the highest ranks. But Francis made 
 it a maxim, that all nobles were equal ; he called himself 
 " the first gentleman of France ;" and whilst his pride
 
 260 HISTORY OF FKANCE. 1 54?7 
 
 degraded the peasant and artisan far below him, his 
 generosity raised to his own level all those of gentle 
 birth in his dominions. It was owing to this mode of 
 viewing and of classing the French, that the nation soon 
 became divided into two castes ; the one apparently that 
 of conquerors, the other that of the conquered. One 
 represents the Franks, the other the Gauls ; and eru- 
 dition lent its weight to sanction, by a false theory, that 
 pernicious division, the result of royal whim and aris- 
 tocratic arrogance. 
 
 The formation of a court, begun by Anne of Britany, 
 but accomplished by Francis, had a great share in pro- 
 ducing and strengthening this state of things. Men 
 may form opinions, but it is women who foster them 
 into prejudice. The court became a school of manners, 
 of morals, and political conduct, with immense influence 
 over the nation ; but with still greater over the monarch, 
 whose personal character and feelings were speedily 
 merged in that of the little world around him. It soon 
 matured a scheme of moral, as well as of political prin- 
 ciple, for itself, such as it found to be convenient. The 
 political code we find in Machiavel ; the moral is the 
 worst and most corrupted state of Catholicism. Prelates 
 thronged at court. It counted no less than twelve car- 
 dinals at the death of Francis, of which number seven 
 were instantly got rid of by his successor. Those, as is 
 related of the Jesuits, adopted the habits and morals 
 of their sphere, were amongst the most gallant and cor- 
 rupted, and accordingly were allowed to lirect the con- 
 science of that high-born race whose licentiousness they 
 countenanced and absolved. VFhile the church was 
 chicaning Henry upon his marriages, Francis was in the 
 full career of licentiousness, as an orthodox and most 
 Christian king. 
 
 To such a court, the very name of reform was dis- 
 tasteful. Not but that reform itself was made subser- 
 vient, as well as Catholicism, to the lusts and passions of 
 mankind, but the passions of Francis had full play under 
 the wing of the orthodox church. His interests, too,
 
 154-7- CHARACTER OF FRANCIS I. %6l 
 
 after the concordat had given him the nomination of 
 benefices, agreed with those of that church. And what 
 was more important, the French nobility had the same 
 interests : for the right of election, sanctioned hy Cal- 
 vinism, would take away those rich ecclesiastical offices 
 now reserved exclusively for them. Had Lutheranism 
 made its way into France, as it had into England, it 
 might have been tolerated ; but Calvinism roused at 
 once the king, the court, the prelates, nobles, legists. 
 The object of Francis in inviting JMelancthon was per- 
 haps to inoculate his subjects with a milder species of 
 heresy, the distemper in one shape or other being un- 
 avoidable. But Geneva succeeded in communicating its 
 religious tenets to a great portion of the French people. 
 Francis has been not unjustly accused of despotic 
 propensities. The royal person and authority acquired 
 a kind of sacro-sanctity in his reign ; and yet the ge- 
 neral progress of opinion, formed upon a mixture of 
 romance and classic reading, and taking consistency 
 from the facilities which the institution of a court 
 afforded to the noble class for communicating and com- 
 paring their peculiar ideas, is more the cause of this 
 than any policy or conduct of the monarch. " Do 
 what we will," said Louis XII., in his declining days, 
 " that big fellow Francis will spoil ah 1 ." Yet it is dif- 
 ficult to say what he did spoil. He certainly refrained 
 from calling the states together ; yet Louis had but once 
 adopted that measure : and Francis certainly did no 
 more than follow the steps of his predecessor in the 
 mode of levying taxes, however he might surpass him in 
 the measure. The people were not discontented with 
 Francis ; unfortunately they did not regret the states. 
 It was to sedition, and to a lack of authority, that most 
 of the past divisions and disasters of France were to be 
 ascribed ; and the people congratulated themselves upon 
 having a powerful king, who had humbled the chiefs of 
 the aristocracy, and who secured to all an~equal distri- 
 bution of justice. Unfortunately, too, the tide of the time 
 ran towards despotic power in a monarch, and the mon- 
 s 3
 
 262 HISTORY OF PRANCE. 1547- 
 
 arch went with this tide. But I cannot look upon 
 Francis as selfishly or designedly culpable of under- 
 mining the liberties of France. 
 
 The glory of the monarch's reign is his patronage of 
 letters and of the fine arts. Primaticcio, under whose 
 direction so many noble edifices sprung up in France, 
 was an architect whom his liberality had enticed from 
 Italy ; and Leonardo da Vinci, more famed, though less 
 prolific, as a painter, won from the same country by 
 Francis, reflects honour on his patronage and taste. Of 
 literature, unfortunately for the fame of the munificent 
 king, the rude foundations were yet to be laid ; and 
 these he applied himself to establish, in endowing col- 
 leges, in opening schools, in inviting men of learning to 
 his capital, and rewarding them. As yet there were not 
 materials, there existed not that refinement of tongue, 
 that maturity of taste, requisite for the production of great 
 works. Still Rabelais indulged his coarse wit with im- 
 punity, being in this respect more fortunate than Marot. 
 This first of the French poets early espoused the principles 
 of Calvin, and materially helped to disseminate them by 
 his translation of the Psalms, which soon became the 
 favourite chant of the people. To sing them, however, 
 was considered a crime worthy of the stake; and Marot 
 was obliged to save himself from that punishment by 
 voluntary exile. 
 
 CHAP. VII. 
 15471559. 
 
 HENRY THE SECOND. 
 
 HENRY II. was thirty years of age when he ascended 
 the throne. He resembled his father in size and 
 strength, but had not the same graces of person ; neither 
 had he the taste, the warmth, the talents, or the amia-
 
 1547- MONTMORENCY RECALLED. 263 
 
 bility of Francis. Still he had commanded armies 
 without disrepute, and was violently attached to those 
 rude and warlike exercises which had been a pastime of 
 his father. Although passionless, he had thought fit to 
 follow the example of Francis in selecting a mistress. 
 This was Diana of Poitiers, soon after created duchess 
 of Valentinois, a dame who was of an age to be his 
 mother, and who really exercised a kind of maternal 
 authority over him. Francis, having observed with 
 pain his son's dullness and uncouthness, had rejoiced at 
 seeing him devote himself to an accomplished woman, 
 who might form his manners and awaken his taste. 
 The charms of Diana, however, were productive of little 
 effect upon Henry, save that of establishing her own 
 influence. She had, even in the lifetime of the late 
 monarch, engaged Henry in a kind of unmeaning rivalry 
 or hostility towards the court, or rather towards the 
 duchess d'Etampes. The existence of these parties has 
 been noticed, and the constable Montmorency owed his 
 long disgrace in part to their intrigues. 
 
 The first act of the new king was to summon Mont- 
 morency to court and to re-establish him in authority; 
 which, however, he shared with the Guises, and with 
 the marechal Saint Andre, the playmate of Henry, and 
 the son of his governor. The duchess d'Etaaapes was 
 deprived of all the rich possessions that she owed to the 
 favour of the late king ; and her husband was even 
 urged to institute a law-suit against her, in which Henry 
 himself had the meanness to appear as a witness. This 
 proceeded from the triumphant rivalry of Diana. The 
 severe spirit of Montmorency showed itself in the exe- 
 cution of de Coucy, and of the marechal du Biez, for 
 not having defended Boulogne with more vigour. Mont- 
 morency affected the character of Cato the Censor : 
 it was the fashion to adopt classic heroes as models ; 
 hence he gave full scope to a rude and merciless temper. 
 Jealous of the influence of prelates and cardinals, he 
 banished them from court, and would willingly have 
 passed the same decree against the ladies who thronged 
 s 4
 
 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1547- 
 
 thither ; but Diana of Poitiers was not to be resisted, 
 and the constable, instead of opposing, rather courted 
 her favour. Another point of Montmorency's character, 
 for which, too, he might plead the example of his Roman 
 model, should not be omitted, this was avarice. He 
 laboured and intrigued to add to his rich domains, and 
 terrified the count de Chateaubriand so as to compel 
 that nobleman to bequeath his possessions to the Mont- 
 morencies. Thus, as Francis robbed the unfortunate 
 man of his wife, the minister of Francis robbed him of 
 his heritage. The Guises acted a different part from 
 that of Montmorency : they were, indeed, equally urgent 
 for place and pension, but then their purpose was to 
 lavish, not to hoard. They were generous, and ex- 
 pended largely in gaining friends and partisans ; as if, 
 from the commencement, they had been actuated by the 
 ambition of raising their family to the first rank in the 
 state. When these greedy and contending chiefs of 
 parties came to divide at once the gifts of royalty, and 
 the spoil of the people, Diana of Poitiers, for example, 
 received all the fines paid for the renewal of offices and 
 privileges under the new reign, men at once perceived 
 and regretted the prudent policy of Francis, who had 
 exiled the constable, and mistrusted the Guises. Acting 
 contrary to his example and advice, and allowing the 
 great aristocratic chiefs to acquire influence and wealth 
 in the administration, instead of changing his ministers, 
 and preventing the undue pre-eminence of any subject, 
 Henry laid the foundation of those party intrigues and 
 civil wars which proved the destruction of his race. 
 
 It was the care of the new king to celebrate the ob- 
 sequies of his predecessor in the most magnificent style. 
 The bishop, who pronounced the funeral oration, used 
 a bold metaphor, which gave occasion to the bigots of 
 the Sorbonne to show their zeal. King Francis, accord- 
 ing to the worthy prelate, had been of so holy a life, 
 that his soul had gone straight into paradise without 
 passing through the flames of purgatory. The denial 
 of purgatory was a favourite tenet of the reformers.
 
 1547- JAUXAC AND CHATAIGNERAIE. 265 
 
 The Sorbonne forthwith accused the preacher of hen 
 they sent a deputation to St. Germain to make known 
 their complaint to the king. Mendosa, a chief officer 
 of the court, first received it ; and, by a facetious speech, 
 saved Henry from an act of injustice. " Calm your- 
 selves, gentlemen," said he to the deputies of the Sor- 
 bonne ; " if you had known the good king Francis as 
 well as I did, you would have better understood the 
 words of the preacher. Francis was not a man to tarry 
 long any where ; and if he did take a turn in purgatory, 
 believe me, the devil himself could not persuade him to 
 make any thing like a sojourn." 
 
 The famous duel between Jarnac and Chataigneraie, 
 was the first striking event of Henry's reign. They had 
 both been pages in the court of Francis I. Chataigne- 
 raie was a stout youth, given to quarrel, skilled at his 
 weapon, and renowned for his hardihood : he excelled 
 in those rude and martial exercises which the dauphin 
 Henry loved, and was consequently a favourite with 
 him. Jarnac, on the contrary, was a beau, given to 
 gallantry, and fond of dress and elegance ; a taste which 
 he indulged to an extent beyond his apparent means. 
 1 1 happened that once in the society of Henry, Chataig- 
 neraie, contemning such taste and such a mode of life, 
 asked Jarnac, where he found resources for such expense? 
 Jarnac replied, " that although his father was liberal 
 in his allowances, yet that he obtained an increase of 
 funds through his step-mother, with whom he had made 
 himself a favourite." This passed. But Chataigneraie 
 construed the words of Jarnac into an insinuation that 
 he enjoyed the favour of his step-mother in a criminal 
 sense. He mentioned this to Henry, who repeated it to 
 Diana of Poitiers. The calumny circulated in whispers, 
 and at length reached the ears of Jarnac's father. The 
 son was summoned. In horror he disavowed the crime, 
 and succeeded in exculpating himself. He followed 
 this up by appearing before Francis in the presence of 
 the court, and declaring, that whoever had given birth 
 to such a report, " lied in his throat." The dauphin
 
 266 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1548. 
 
 took this deadly insult to himself : he, however, could 
 not come forward. The rude Chataigneraie did, and 
 asserted, that he had heard Jarnac boast of having been 
 too intimate with his step-mother. A challenge, of 
 course, was the consequence, and Francis was besought 
 by the antagonists to appoint the field for a combat, the 
 issue of which was to decide the guilt or innocence of 
 Jarnac. Francis, however, forbade the duel, either 
 averse to the absurd principle of judicial combat, or 
 aware how much the imprudence of his son had been 
 the occasion of the quarrel. On Henry's accession 
 Jarnac renewed his challenge and demand. The king 
 consented. The lists were prepared at St. Germain : 
 Henry and his court were witnesses. When the an- 
 tagonists met in the enclosed field, the slender Jarnac 
 seemed unable to resist the powerful Chataigneraie : 
 he retired before his blows, covering himself with 
 his buckler, until seizing an opportunity he wounded 
 his adversary in the back of the leg, and completely 
 .disabled him. The victor, however, spared his ad- 
 versary. Having in vain asked Chataigneraie to recall 
 the calumnies that he had uttered, Jarnac advanced to- 
 wards the monarch, and, by the usual courtesy of placing 
 it at the sovereign's disposal, waved his right to his 
 enemy's life. The fierce Chataigneraie scorned to be 
 thus spared : he refused chirurgical aid ; even tore his 
 wounds open when they had been dressed, and died. 
 Such was the judicial combat, in which may be said to 
 have originated the modern duel. 
 
 The new reign was signalised by a number of new 
 edicts. Robberies and assassinations had become more 
 common : commerce with Italy, and the recent inven- 
 tion of the pistol, that convenient weapon for conceal- 
 ment and menace, contributed to this. Severe laws for 
 seizing murderers were enacted, and the condemned were 
 to be broken on the wheel. Arms were forbidden, ex- 
 cept for the military. The jurisdiction of the provost of 
 police was extended, to the dissatisfaction of the parlia- 
 ment, who protested, and could only be brought to register
 
 lj-18. INSURRECTION AT BORDEAUX. 2(>7 
 
 the law by considering the wickedness of the age. A com- 
 plete poor-law was at the same time enacted for the 
 capital ; and sumptuary edicts prohibited the use of 
 silk and velvet, with curious exceptions in favour of dif- 
 ferent garments and personages. To call together the 
 states was no more the policy of Henry than of Francis; 
 and to impose new taxes was an unpopular commence- 
 ment of a new reign : nevertheless, the fixed revenue 
 did not suffice ; war was becoming daily more expensive. 
 An increase in the current value of coin, the sale of 
 the crown lands, and the demand of a .free gift from 
 the good towns, were the first financial measures of 
 Henry. 
 
 After his consecration the king proceeded to make the 
 tour of his dominions, visiting his strong places, and re- 
 viewing his armies. He had reached Turin, Avhen tid- 
 ings arrived of a serious insurrection in Angoumois and 
 Saintonge. The gabelleurs, or collectors of the salt tax, 
 had commenced their operations in the new reign with 
 increased rigour. The inhabitants of the little town of 
 Lorignac first thought proper to resist : they beat the 
 collectors, and put them to flight. The whole country, 
 on learning this success, fell on the odious gabelleurs : 
 the peasants armed and mustered ; and the collectors hav- 
 ing disappeared, they proceeded to attack the chateaux 
 of the gentry. The insurrection at length reached Bor- 
 deaux ; and its governor, Monneins, found it necessary 
 to shut himself in Chateau-trompette, the fortress of the 
 town. Imprudently coming forth soon afterwards to par- 
 ley with the insurgents, he was slain. The people salted 
 his mangled remains, to mark the cause of their sedition. 
 
 The king, on learning these excesses, instantly re- 
 turned to Lyons, and despatched the constable with an. 
 army to crush the insurrection. The Bordelais, who 
 knew his severe temper, were terrified at his approach. 
 They sent a splendid bark for his conveyance, with their 
 keys, in token of submission, and a prayer that the lans- 
 quenets, whose violence they dreaded, might not be 
 allowed to enter their walls. f< My lansquenets are
 
 2GS HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1 5 1$. 
 
 loyal servitors of the king," replied Montmorency ; " take 
 back your keys ; here are those I intend to make use of." 
 He pointed to a formidable train of artillery. The con- 
 stable's entry was like his answer, menacing. His 
 first care was to erect gibbets and scaffolds. One hundred 
 citizens were thereon executed. Two peasant leaders 
 died on the rack. The city was to lose its privileges ; 
 and its chief magistrates were compelled to disinter, A\ itli 
 their nails, the body of Monneins, and transport it for 
 honourable burial to the cathedral. Montmorency 's 
 progress through the insurgent provinces was marked 
 by equal severity. Henry made afterwards some com- 
 pensation for this rigour. Bordeaux recovered its pri- 
 vileges ; and the gabelle itself was diminished. After 
 this success the court celebrated at Moulins the marriage 
 of Antoine de Bourbon duke de Vendome with Jane 
 
 'Albret, daughter and heiress of the king of Navarre. 
 
 'rom this union Henry IV. was destined to spring. 
 
 The peace with England and with the emperor had 
 subsisted during the two first years of Henry's reign, 
 notwithstanding the determination of all parties to re- 
 engage in war. But the emperor, though victorious over 
 the protestants, was yet occupied in establishing and 
 confirming the superiority that his arms had acquired. 
 The English flag, waving on the walls of Boulogne, was 
 what chiefly touched and occupied Henry. His views 
 were turned in that direction, rather than towards Ger- 
 many. The cautious counsels of Montmorency alone 
 kept the young king from open war with England. The 
 policy of France, however, acquired a victory over her 
 enemy at this time, greater than any that her arms could 
 effect. This was the abstraction of Mary, heiress of 
 Scotland, from that country to France, where she was 
 betrothed to Francis, eldest son of Henry II. In the 
 following year the French attacked Boulogne with a 
 large force, while, the duke of Somerset, occupied with 
 the discontents and dissensions at home, was unable to 
 despatch an army to its relief. Nor could the emperor be 
 induced to aid or interfere. A wet season, and an hum-
 
 1550. TREATY BETAFEEN FRANCE AND ENGLAND* 2^9 
 
 dation, which broke up the camp of the French, and dis- 
 persed their forces, alone saved Boulogne for that year ; 
 and in the next a treaty was concluded between the crowns, 
 greatly to the advantage of France. Boulogne was sur- 
 rendered ; a certain sum was paid by France, who never- 
 theless refused to continue the pension that Francis I. 
 had paid to Henry. Scotland was included hi the 
 treaty. 
 
 Hume remarks, that during these negotiations the 
 emperor observed that the prerogatives of an English 
 king were more extensive than those of a king of France. 
 The emperor, in one respect, spoke truth. The English 
 king had more power over his nobles, to ruin, or cause 
 them to be beheaded. This proceeded from the late civil 
 wars, from the change of dynasty, and from the frequency 
 and danger of treason. Hence the king of England 
 was more dreaded in his court, the etiquette of which 
 was most severe. Vieilleville, sent as an envoy to Eng- 
 land by Henry II., observed with wonder that the 
 British monarch was served by lords on the knee. The 
 debonnaire Francis had established for nobles much 
 greater equality with the crown. But if the English 
 kings were more powerful judicially than the French, or 
 rather, if they made more use of that authority, the 
 English commons, on the other hand, preserved their 
 principal right and custom of granting taxes ; and how- 
 ever base and obsequious were the parliaments of the 
 Tuclors, still they did wisely in not risking their exist- 
 ence and influence in a premature struggle with the 
 crown, such as had proved the ruin of the French 
 states-general, until the public mind had gathered the 
 information and consistency requisite to support them 
 or until religious dissent and freedom of opinion had 
 arisen to give a new and stubborn principle of force to 
 the people. 
 
 France had now remained for six years at peace with 
 the empire. Charles had well employed this interval 
 of leisure in humbling and subduing the protestant 
 league of German princes. With the aid of Maurice of
 
 270 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1550. 
 
 Saxony, he hail defeated tkem at the battle of Muhlberg, 
 in l.jJ-7- He ha.il l)een severe,, and even unjust, in his 
 treatment of their chiefs, whom he retained prisoners. 
 But his efforts had been zealously and not illiberally 
 directed towards the impracticable task of reconciling 
 and uniting the two hostile sects. Had the debate been 
 even confined to Germany, any arrangement short of 
 toleration would have been impossible. But the rights 
 and claims, the spiritual and temporal interests of the 
 pope, joined with his bad faith and intrigues, might 
 have deterred even the politic and powerful Charles from 
 the attempt. A general council was summoned at Trent. 
 The protestants disowned, and the pontiff dreaded its 
 authority. The appearance of a pestilential disease 
 afforded Paul a pretext to remove it to Bologna. Months 
 passed in discussions. The pope and the emperor could 
 not take the same views. The pope would not yield a 
 jot of his authority ; and the emperor, sincerely inte- 
 rested in its consequences, was bent on restoring peace 
 to the church. Enmity broke out between them. The 
 assassination of the pope's nephew Farnese, by some 
 malcontent nobles of Placentia, and the subsequent occu- 
 pation of that town by the emperor, completed the 
 disgust of Paul, who applied to Henry for his alliance 
 and aid. But the French monarch was not yet pre- 
 pared ; besides, the great age of the pontiff deterred him. 
 The emperor, in the mean time, tried his plan of con- 
 ciliation. He caused to be drawn up such a series of 
 religious tenets, as he imagined both parties might accept 
 from a love of peace. These, known under the name of 
 Interim, were presented to a diet : they were dissatis- 
 factory to both parties ; but the emperor insisted on 
 submission to them, until a general council should 
 decide. 
 
 Henry II. had hitherto forborne to interfere in 
 these religious quarrels. He wisely determined on 
 first settling his differences with England. Neverthe- 
 less his edicts against heretics, and his pursuit of them 
 in his own dominions, manifested his orthodoxy. In
 
 1551. WAR WITH THE POPE AND EMPEROR. 271 
 
 March, 1548, numbers of people from Auvergne were 
 burned in Paris for heresy ; and the gorgeous ceremony 
 of Henry's public entry into his capital was terminated, 
 as all festivals and holidays were, by a similar sacrifice. 
 The king had as yet no feeling but contempt for the 
 reformation. None but the lowest and most ignorant 
 of his subjects professed it, at least openly. And the 
 absence from court of that host of prelates, who had 
 urged Francis to persecution, left the monarch for a 
 time happily ignorant, or careless, of a disease, that had 
 already gained the vitals of the kingdom. 
 
 The peace between France and England excited, not 
 without reason, the emperor's jealousy and fears. Henry 
 now turned his view to oppose Charles, and many little 
 causes T)f difference had arisen between them. The 
 affair of Parma was left unsettled by pope Paul, who 
 died in 1550. The new pontiff, Julius III., was em- 
 barrassed by the conflicting interests and desires of 
 Francis and of Charles. The Council of Trent was 
 summoned to meet in the following May. But both 
 monarchs and the pontiff forgot alike the peace of the 
 church and the repose of Christendom, in their desire 
 to preserve influence or dominion in one town. Julius, 
 after much hesitation, inclined to the side of the em- 
 peror, who flattered him with the idea of making Parma 
 a principality for one of his family. Charles accord- 
 ingly, with the pope's acquiescence, besieged Farnese 
 in Parma. Henry instantly ordered troops to his aid; 
 and thus the war commenced in 1551, though no mili- 
 tary feat signalised the brief campaign. 
 
 Henry, now at enmity with pope and emperor, look- 
 ed round in search of allies. He succeeded in gaining 
 the Swiss, except those of the protestant cantons of Berne 
 and Zurich, and in exciting the Turks against the em- 
 pire, although this league was of course kept as secret 
 as possible. The protestant princes of Germany were 
 those whose alliance was most important in resisting 
 and diverting the forces of Charles. That party had 
 been humbled, but not destroyed. The emperor, in the
 
 272 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1551. 
 
 arrogance of victory, had alienated from him Maurice 
 the new elector of Saxony, himself a protestant, al- 
 though hitherto the chief cause of the downfall of the 
 protestant league. Maurice, having secured from Charles 
 the pre-eminence agreeable to his ambition, which was 
 all the advantage he could hope to gain, now meditated 
 on rallying the vanquished party, in order to put himself 
 at its head, and defy the emperor. In secret the pro- 
 testant league was renewed ; and envoys were sent to 
 Henry to conclude an alliance with him. It is asserted 
 in the memoirs of Vieilleville, that the king and the con- 
 stable were both averse to this alliance, and wished to 
 retire from the war, until Vieilleville himself spoke, and 
 not only decided the council in favour of the alliance, 
 but proposed the seizure of the three imperial towns of 
 Metz, Toul, and Verdun, agreeably to a suggestion of 
 count Nassau. Vieilleville probably exaggerated his own 
 influence, and miscalculated respecting the backward- 
 ness of Henry and Montmorency on this occasion. At 
 any rate, the league was concluded against the emperor, 
 and Maurice of Saxony was declared its chief. The 
 king promised to pay 240,000 crowns at the commence- 
 ment of the war, and a monthly subsidy afterwards. 
 He was also to attack the Low Countries, and possess 
 himself of the imperial towns above mentioned. This 
 treaty, concluded in October, 1551, was kept secret until 
 the subtile Maurice declared the moment favourable for 
 throwing off the mask. 
 
 Henry's resentment against the pope was excessive. 
 He sent Amyot, the translator of Plutarch, to Trent, 
 where the council was to assemble on the 1st of Sep- 
 tember. Amyot protested in a public speech against 
 the authority of an assembly, which the French prelates 
 were prevented from joining by the war which the pon- 
 tiff himself had excited. In a speech, of which the 
 aim is not very clear, though the ill temper is evident, 
 Amyot enumerates a long list of papal iniquities and 
 usurpations. He alluded to the pragmatic sanction as 
 still in vigour, declared Henry's contempt of excom-
 
 1551. EDICT AGAINST HERETICS. 273 
 
 munication, and entreated the fathers toapplysome remedy 
 to this rifting schism. The French king showed his in- 
 veteracy not only in word but in act, by issuing an edict 
 forbidding the despatch of annates, or any tribute 
 money to Rome. These menaces intimidated the pope 
 more than the arms of Henry. Ere the year elapsed, 
 Julius sued for a reconciliation, which took place, and a 
 cessation of hostilities left France in possession of Parma. 
 But lest the partisans of the reformation should be em- 
 boldened in the kingdom by this enmity towards the 
 pope, and by the king's league with the German pro- 
 testants, soon to be made public, he issued about this 
 time the celebrated edict of Chateaubriand against he- 
 retics. This, besides recapitulating and sanctioning the 
 old punishments againsts innovators in religion, declares 
 their crime cognisable both by the common courts of 
 law and the ecclesiastical courts. The favourers or con- 
 cealers of heretics, even those who interceded for them, 
 were declared equally criminal with the principals. 
 Great pains were taken to discover any such leanings 
 among men in office. A system of espionage was or- 
 dered for this purpose. A profession of faith was pub- 
 licly and frequently demanded, and no new functionaries 
 entered on their employments without a certificate of 
 catholicity. The property of all fugitives was declared 
 to be confiscated, as well as all money sent to Geneva. 
 Severe laws were enacted against the press ; and that 
 of Lyons was more especially watched and fettered, 
 owing to its vicinity to Switzerland. A Dominican friar, 
 named Orri, was confirmed in the office of grand inqui- 
 sitor, and he was allowed to appoint subaltern agents 
 throughout the kingdom. This fearful body had in 
 France, however, no greater power than that of enquir- 
 ing and denouncing : condemnations could only be passed 
 in the regular laic or ecclesiastical courts. 
 
 The winter of 1551-2 was employed by Henry, as 
 well as by Maurice of Saxony, in secret preparations for 
 attacking the emperor. Henry held a bed of justice, a 
 kind of solemn meeting of the king and court with the 
 
 VOJL. i- T
 
 274 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1552. 
 
 parliament, in February. Notwithstanding the now 
 established despotism of the French king, the necessity 
 was felt of making publicly known new and important 
 measures of policy or finance, to a body that represented, 
 or might affect to represent, the nation. The king in a 
 speech explained the cause and purpose of the war on 
 which he was about to enter ; recommended the main- 
 tenance of justice and the suppression of heresy ; and 
 stated his intention of leaving the queen as regent in 
 his absence, the first time that Catherine of Medicis 
 appears to have been invested with authority. The con- 
 stable, who spoke after the king, detailed at greater length 
 all the improvements and policy of the reign : he enu- 
 merated the forces then in active service ; stated the ad- 
 ditional force that would be requisite ; and concluded by 
 asking those assembled, as if they were the states-general, 
 what they could do in return, and in support of such 
 wisdom? The cardinal of Bourbon then rose, and an- 
 nounced that the French church had agreed to offer a 
 considerable sum to meet the present necessities of the 
 kingdom. The fact was, that an edict, framed by chan- 
 cellor Poyet, was issued by Francis I. in 1539, con- 
 siderably curtailing the jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical 
 courts; and the sum now offered by the clergy was the 
 price of the repeal of the obnoxious law. The repeal 
 was promised, but the parliament never would allow it 
 to be registered, or to have force. At present, in answer 
 to the constable's exhortation, the parliament made no 
 offer of their purse; they merely promised obsequiousness 
 and obedience; which were soon put to the test when the 
 financial scheme of the constable was announced. This 
 was the establishment of sixty minor or presidial courts, 
 as they were called, throughout the kingdom, for the 
 hearing and deciding of all suits, in which the value to 
 be recovered did not exceed 500 livres. Divers other 
 vendible offices and courts were also ordained ; and thus 
 was created a lasting annual charge upon the state, for 
 the sake of a momentary sum. The parliament were 
 thunderstruck, and made some demur; but, as they
 
 1552. HENRY SEIZES METZ. 275 
 
 could propose no better plan in the exigencies of the 
 moment, they allowed the new edict to be registered by 
 express command of the king, thus recording at the same 
 time their own dissent. 
 
 The king summoned his army and noblesse to meet 
 him in March, on the borders of Champagne. At that 
 very period Maurice of Saxony threw off the mask and 
 turned his arms against the emperor, who was reposing 
 in confidence at Inspruck, without any means of defence. 
 Never was a cunning prince so taken in his own toils. 
 Maurice entered Augsburg on the 1st of April, and In- 
 spruck in May, Charles being obliged to make a pre- 
 cipitate retreat to avoid being taken prisoner. Henry, 
 on his part, commenced by making himself master of 
 Toul, which opened its gates. Metz, more important, 
 made more difficulties. The French army was beneath 
 its walls, and the citizens feared alike to submit and to 
 resist. They permitted the constable, however, to enter 
 with a guard of honour. Montmorency, by stratagem, 
 multiplied his guard into a strong division : the burgher 
 sentries, who objected, were pushed aside, and Metz 
 was in the power of the French. All Lorraine was over- 
 run by them, and the young duke of that province was 
 conveyed to Paris to be educated with the dauphin. 
 The Guises were too honourable to allow of the spolia- 
 tion of their helpless relative. Strasburg, however, 
 warned by the fate of Metz, refused to admit the French 
 troops : tidings arrived, in the mean time, that Maurice, 
 having failed in his project of taking the emperor, had 
 concluded a treaty with him. This was the peace of 
 religion, or of Passau, by which liberty of conscience 
 was secured to the German protestants. Never was 
 nobler aim gained by war : we even pardon, in consider- 
 ation of that great end, the dissimulation and falsehood 
 of Maurice. 
 
 Henry now discovered that he was abandoned by his 
 
 new allies, who had made their peace with the emperor, 
 
 without including him or consulting his interests. They 
 
 perhaps reasoned, that the towns which he had taken 
 
 T 2
 
 276 HISTORY CF FRANCE. 
 
 were ample payment for the assistance that he had ren- 
 dered. The French king soon began to feel himself ex- 
 posed to the sole fury of the war. The emperor's sister, 
 who governed the Low Countries, sent two armies; one 
 to ravage Picardy, the other Champagne. Instead, how- 
 ever, of defending his subjects, Henry advanced to an- 
 noy those of his enemy. He entered the province of 
 Luxembourg, overran it, and took several towns. The 
 emperor, in the mean time, had mustered his forces. 
 An event that spoke well for the character of Charles 
 was, that his captains, and the subjects of his various 
 kingdoms, rallied to his aid instead of deserting him in 
 his distress, and he soon found himself at the head of 
 an army of 60,000 men. With this force he advanced 
 to the Rhine, sedulously endeavouring to conceal the ob- 
 ject of his march. But Henry was at no loss to discover 
 this. The possession of the towns lately captured was 
 of the first importance to his kingdom, which they 
 covered on the side of Champagne, a frontier compara- 
 tively open without them ; and the sarne reasons which 
 prompted Henry to return and defend them obstinately, 
 must have equally stimulated Charles to recapture them, 
 even if ideas of retaliation and vengeance had not been 
 a sufficient impulse. 
 
 To put Metz into a state of defence was now the sole 
 thought of the French. It is singular, that giving bat- 
 tle to the emperor was never once proposed by any officer 
 of that gallant nation. But with all the valour dis- 
 played by individuals," nothing could be more timid than 
 the general operations of war in those days ; a misfor- 
 tune doubtless attributable in a great measure to the 
 limited and almost exhausted finances of Henry. 
 
 Francis duke of Guise, who had not long succeeded 
 to his father Claude, the first duke, took upon him the 
 command of Metz. A great part of the warlike noblesse 
 of France hastened to serve under his command, and, 
 with 6000 chosen troops, composed the garrison. The 
 exertions of Guise to conciliate the inhabitants of the 
 new conquest, to repair and complete the fortificationSj
 
 1552. METZ INVESTED BY CHARLES. 2? 7 
 
 and to provide ample store of victuals, were strenuous. 
 He gained on this occasion the reputation of a hero, by 
 his activity, a quality not less excellent than courage. 
 
 It was the middle of October ere Charles invested 
 Metz, the duke of Alva having the chief command under 
 him. Albert of Brandenburg was in the neighbourhood 
 with a body of mercenary troops. Both parties en- 
 deavoured to gain him, but the emperor succeeded. 
 Albert signalised his adhesion by routing a French 
 corps, and taking prisoner the duke of Aumale, the 
 brother of Guise. The defence was not less obstinate. 
 A month elapsed ere any thing like a breach could be 
 effected, but the activity of Guise had raised new for- 
 tifications. Not even the presence of the emperor could 
 inspire the audacity requisite for the attack. Winter 
 at length surprised the besiegers, and it came with un- 
 usual rigour. The army, encamped under tents, soon 
 suffered from the severity of the weather; and provisions 
 began to grow scarce, the supplies being intercepted by 
 hovering bodies of French cavalry. Early in December 
 a vigorous sortie of the garrison had discomfited the im- 
 perialists. The latter, notwithstanding their position as 
 besiegers, confined themselves to the defensive, whilst their 
 enemies were ever ready to rush out to the attack. The 
 difficulty, indeed, was to restrain them, ani l thisimpe- 
 tuosity it was which chiefly employed the ingenuity of 
 Guis Charles atlength tried to undermine the walls 
 atuTto effect a breach ; but the French countermined, 
 and wore out his patience as well as his force. After 
 a sorry Christmas Charles raised the siege, and the 
 glory of Guise was complete. He made a generous use 
 of victory ; provided necessaries for the wounded and 
 famished enemy, and contrived to become as popular 
 with the foe as he already was with the French. His 
 troops imitated him. A squadron engaged in pursuit of 
 the flying enemy came up with a band, who asked, 
 simply enough, what the French wanted ? " We 
 seek to exchange a few blows, to be sure," was the reply. 
 " We are in no condition for any such amusement," 
 T 3
 
 278 HISTOHY OF FRANCE. 1554. 
 
 rejoined the imperialists: " go away, and let us retire 
 in quiet." The French were generous enough to follow 
 the advice. 
 
 Charles shut himself up in Brussels, devoured with 
 mortification, and tormented by the gout. " 1 see that 
 fortune is a woman," exclaimed he : " she abandons my 
 grey hairs." The emperor's spirit rallied, however, 
 when the season arrived for again entering the field, and 
 he succeeded in taking partial vengeance. He made 
 himself master of Terouanne ; and in his anger rased 
 and obliterated it so completely, that not a vestige of it 
 now remains. This was an important loss. Terouanne 
 in the north, and Aix in the south, were considered the 
 bulwarks of the kingdom, or, in the words of Francis I., 
 they were " the pillows on which a king of France 
 might lay his head."* Hesdin, a strong town on the 
 borders of Picardy, was also taken by the emperor. 
 There seems to have been no army, to oppose to him ; 
 the want of troops being still owing to the low state of the 
 finances. The revenue was not sufficient for the defence 
 of the kingdom. The government feared to increase 
 the taxes, and had recourse to temporary expedients for 
 raising money ; while they feared to convoke the states- 
 general, who might have adapted the revenue to the 
 advance and exigencies of the time. Besides the usual 
 expedient of creating new offices, and of rendering the 
 old offices hereditary, for money, a kind of stamp or 
 registry duty was established ; and an iniquitous law 
 obliged the subject, in certain cases, to yield up his in- 
 come to the king in lieu of uncertain and long-dated 
 drafts on the salt fund. 
 
 In policy Charles still showed himself to have the 
 advantage. The marriage of Philip, his eldest son, with 
 Mary queen of England, in the commencement of 1554, 
 menaced Henry with a renewal of that league which 
 had crushed his father. The French, however, seemed 
 determined to repair the ill success of the last campaign. 
 
 * It is curious here to observe that Napoleon looked on Antwerp, May. 
 ence, and Alessandria, as the bulwarks of liis empire
 
 1554". SIEGE OF RENTI. 2~9 
 
 Montmorency, whom the loss of Therouanne had thrown 
 into a fit of sickness, spent the winter in the collection 
 of funds and forces ; and Henry, accompanied by the 
 constable and the duke of Guise, entered the Low Coun- 
 tries. They laid siege to Marienburg, and took it : 
 Bovines and Dinant were also won. Philibert Emma- 
 nuel prince of Savoy, the son of that duke whom the 
 arms of Francis I. had dispossessed, cannonaded the 
 imperialists, but had no force competent to oppose the 
 French. In those days of narrow resources and unsettled 
 finances, contending powers seldom made a simultaneous 
 effort. Previous bad success, or a sudden impulse, excited 
 one of them to a great exertion, which, until an interval 
 had elapsed, it was impossible to renew. Thus advan- 
 tage alternated from side to side, and even victory 
 brought no decision. This year the French were in 
 sufficient force for battle, and it was the desire of Guise 
 to fight ; but the prudent Montmorency, to whose opi- 
 nions the king paid great deference, would not admit of 
 risk. The veteran constable began to entertain consi- 
 derable jealousy of Guise, and of the fame he had ac- 
 quired by the defence of Metz. Montmorency put 
 forward his nephew Gaspard de Coligny as a competitor 
 of Guise, placing Coligny under the duke's command, to 
 watch and witness his proceedings. 
 
 The French invested Renti, a frontier town of Artois, 
 and warmly pressed the siege. Charles himself advanced 
 to throw succours into it, and encamped near the French, 
 The duke of Guise commanded the wing or division next 
 to the emperor. He conceived a plan for drawing on a 
 general action by means of an ambuscade, to which he 
 enticed the enemy's cavalry. A partial engagement 
 ensued, in which Guise was victorious ; but as the con- 
 stable refused to march to his assistance, or make the 
 contest general, the emperor retired to his camp and 
 fortified it. To take Renti in his presence was imprac- 
 ticable, and the siege was therefore abandoned. It was 
 the cause of a lively dispute between Guise and the con- 
 stable, and their mutual enmity became henceforth de- 
 
 T '1
 
 2SO HISTORY OF FRAXCE. 1555. 
 
 clarcrl. In Italy the principal event of the war was the 
 revolt of Sienna in favour of France, and the gallant 
 siege sustained for more than six months by that town 
 against a far superior force. The siege, as recorded hy 
 Montluc himself, the commander, is renowned. Montluc 
 v.-as the Gascon whose impatient oddity and eloquence 
 had won Francis I. to give permission for the battle of 
 Cerisoles. He was a brave but reckless and cruel ad- 
 venturer : he fully displays in his Memoirs that quality 
 of his native province which has become proverbial, 
 viz. gasconading. He was in the end obliged to sur- 
 render Sienna. The French indemnified themselves 
 soon afterwards by the conquest of Corsica. 
 
 The year 1555 commenced with an attempt at con- 
 cluding a peace, under the mediation of cardinal Pole. 
 It failed, but not owing to the spirit or inveteracy of the 
 belligerents. As to Charles, he soon after gave the most 
 convincing proofs that ambition and revenge were alike 
 dead within him. He resigned the crown of Spain, with 
 his possessions in Italy and the Low Countries to his son 
 Philip. He endeavoured to unite the empire in the same 
 hands, but his brother Ferdinand, already emperor elect, 
 was resolute in supporting his right to the full dignity. 
 The time chosen for these resignations was towards the 
 close of the year 1555. Ere they took place, the intrigues 
 of the pope, Paul IV., Caraffa by name, awakened those 
 dormant hopes of conquest in Italy which the French 
 never could altogether abandon. The elevation of a new 
 pope was the signal for his relatives to aim at princi- 
 palities. The nephews of Caraffa might indulge in such 
 aspirations, but the Roman territories had been suffi- 
 ciently curtailed by the cession of Parma to Farnese. 
 From the emperor, who was hostile to Paul's election, 
 they had nothing to hope. Recourse was therefore had 
 to Henry, and temptations were held out to him to 
 undertake the conquest of Naples, the native country of 
 Caraffa. Henry hesitated, and Montmorency strength- 
 ened his prudent resolve not to embroil France again in 
 the unlucky politics of Italy. The Guises were of a dif-
 
 1555. PROGRESS OF CALVINISM IN FRANCE. 281 
 
 ferent opinion : the duke was eager for fame, for victory, 
 and conquest ; his brother the cardinal saw in French 
 success his own elevation to the popedom. Their war- 
 like counsel prevailed against the prudent advice of the 
 constable. A treaty was signed with the pope ; but its 
 fulfilment was interrupted by the retirement of Charles, 
 and the wish that he expressed to leave his empire at 
 peace. This led to negotiations, and finally to a truce 
 of five years, highly advantageous to Henry, whom it 
 left in possession of Savoy, as well as of his important 
 conquests in Lorraine. 
 
 Notwithstanding the numerous and severe edicts of 
 the king, Calvin was daily gaining disciples in France. 
 Hitherto, fearing to show themselves in the capital, 
 they had propagated their opinions amongst the peasantry 
 and provincial burgesses. An edict was issued in 1 552 
 against the hedge-schools (ecoles buissonnicres") which 
 the reformers were in the custom of holding in the coun- 
 try. The unlimited sale of offices, however, counter- 
 acted the severity of Henry's laws. In order to multiply 
 places in the parliament, the judges were to sit but half 
 the year, and to be succeeded by a fresh set altogether. 
 Men of all ranks and opinions had purchased these places 
 of trust. Many who held or favoured reform had thus 
 crept into influence ; and the bigotry of the government 
 was neutralised by its misrule and venality. In 1555, a 
 church or congregation of protestants was formed in 
 Paris after the model of Geneva; and several towns, as 
 Meaux, Poitiers, and Angers, followed the example. The 
 new tenets had even reached the court. Montmorency's 
 nephew, Coligny, the admiral, became a convert, and he 
 made use of his office to despatch a protestant colony to 
 Brazil, which failed, however, in the attempt to form a 
 settlement. The court soon became aware of the pro- 
 gress and boldness of the reformers. The cardinal of 
 Lorraine, on enquiring, found that the provincial and 
 inferior courts, chiefly ecclesiastical, were neutralised in 
 their pursuit of heretics by the liberty allowed of appeal- 
 ing to the parliaments or higher courts, who appeared to
 
 282 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1557- 
 
 be by no means zealous or severe. He therefore pre- 
 pared an ordonnance, declaring the ecclesiastical judges 
 and inquisitors competent to try and condemn without 
 reference or appeal. This, however, the parliament in- 
 stantly refused to register. They sent a deputation to 
 present a remonstrance to the king, conceived in the 
 genuine spirit of toleration, declaring, that " the punish- 
 ment of heretics had increased their number ; and that 
 it would be far preferable to imitate the primitive 
 church, who made proselytes and preserved the faith, 
 not by fire and sword, but by the pure doctrine and 
 exemplary lives of the bishops." The king showed him- 
 self indignant at their opposition ; but the parliament 
 remained unshaken in its determination to resist the 
 establishment of an inquisition. 
 
 The truoe of five years concluded with Charles was 
 doomed not to last out the first twelve months. The 
 Caraffas renewed their solicitations and their offers to 
 tempt Henry to the conquest of Naples ; Guise supported 
 their arguments, and, despite of the constable, war was 
 again resolved on. It was not until the commencement of 
 the following year, 1557, that the duke of Guise could 
 enter Italy at the head of an army. He advanced with 
 it to Rome, bent upon the conquest of Naples. But the 
 pope, on his side, had made no preparations ; his con- 
 tingent of troops was not raised, and Guise's own force 
 was too weak to wrest Naples from the duke of Aha. 
 
 Philip II. in the mean time raised an army in the 
 Low Countries to try his first fortune in war. It 
 amounted to 50,000 men ; and he showed his sagacity 
 in giving the command to Philibert duke of Savoy. He 
 had influence enough with his spouse, queen Mary of 
 England, to make her join him in the war, which she 
 formally declared, sending a large body of English troops 
 to swell Philip's army. The duke of Savoy opened the 
 campaign by laying siege to St. Quentin, a strong town 
 of considerable importance on the Somme. Coligny, 
 whom his uncle Montmorency always pushed on to rival 
 Guise, flung himself into the town, resolved to rival by
 
 1557- SIEGE OP ST. QUENTIN. 283 
 
 its defence that of Metz. The admiral, however., had 
 not so gallant a garrison under his command, and the 
 duke of Savoy pressed the siege with such activity and 
 skill, that Coligny communicated to the constable his 
 fears for the result. 
 
 Montmorency accordingly advanced to succour the 
 admiral, 18,000 troops being the utmost force that he 
 could muster. The flower of the army was in Italy. 
 The walls of St. Quentin adjoined a deep marsh, on 
 which, of course, the besiegers did not take post. 
 Through the marsh flowed a kind of rivulet ; the con- 
 stable proposed embarking his succours on this stream, 
 which would float them towards the walls ; and he cal- 
 culated, that to gain the town from thence would not be 
 difficult. A difference, however, arose in the council. 
 Every measure was fiercely disputed in this reign of 
 rivalry. The constable intended to lead the whole army 
 to the bank of the marsh, in order to protect the troops 
 destined to enter the place. The marechal St. Andre 
 wisely, as it appeared, deprecated the risk, and recom- 
 mended that a body of infantry only should make the 
 ? -jmpt under favour of night. Montmorency, however, 
 led on the whole of his little army, and committed the 
 first blunder in not arriving at the appointed spot until 
 the morning was advanced. However, Dandelot, brother 
 of Coligny, embarked with the succours on the unlucky 
 rivulet, which did not flow near enough to the walls. 
 Most of the troops returned ; many were drowned ; not 
 more than 500, among whom was Dandelot, gained 
 St. Quentin. The duke of Savoy was not idle in ad- 
 vancing on the small army of the French ; while Mont- 
 morency, too tardy in retreating, was equally so in at- 
 tacking. On their passage over a causeway through the 
 marshy grounds, the imperialists might have been as- 
 sailed with advantage ; but the time was lost. The 
 French were surrounded on every side by superior num- 
 bers ; still they fought with obstinacy : Montmorency 
 and St. Andre' charged the enemy with furious courage ; 
 the veteran constable was unhorsed, and taken prisoner ;
 
 284 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1557- 
 
 the count d'Enghien and 600 gentlemen that name 
 now superseded the designation of knight perished. 
 Some of the highest noblesse of France were made cap- 
 tives. 
 
 Philip soon after arrived in his victorious camp, and 
 showed the utmost gratitude towards the duke of Savoy. 
 When the latter sought to kiss the monarch's hand, 
 Philip prevented him, replying, that it was himself who 
 ought to kiss the hands of one that had procured him so 
 glorious a victory. Still he did not pay entire deference 
 to his general's opinion ; for when the duke proposed to 
 abandon St. Quentin, and march without delay towards 
 Paris, the monarch hesitated, and shrunk from the bold 
 enterprise. Philip here showed himself a descendant of 
 the cold and cautious house of Austria. St. Quentin, 
 now closely pressed, was taken by assault, notwithstand- 
 ing all the efforts of Coligny, who was made prisoner 
 while righting in the breach. The French king, amidst 
 these reverses, exerted himself to rally his affairs, and 
 dispel the panic of his people. Despatches were in- 
 stantly sent to Italy, recalling the duke of Guise and his 
 army. The ban and arriere ban were called out, r*.d 
 the fortresses garrisoned. It was the queen, Catherine 
 of Medicis, who showed her activity and presence of 
 mind on this occasion. She summoned the burgesses of 
 Paris, restored confidence to them by her words, and 
 obtained from them the grant of 100,000 crowns; con- 
 sidering that sum necessary for raising and supporting a 
 corps of 10,000 men. The king, at the same time, in 
 his panic, promised his subjects to convoke the states 
 general in the ensuing year. Either the fears of the 
 French were groundless, or their exertions for defence 
 effectual. Philip made no use of his brilliant victory ; 
 and his army dispersed in autumn without even capturing 
 another town. 
 
 By that time the duke of Guise had returned to Paris. 
 His departure had obliged the pope to become reconciled 
 to Philip, who testified that reverence for the church 
 which education had instilled into him, by exacting no
 
 1558. CALAIS TAKEN FH03I THE ENGLISH. 285 
 
 harsh conditions. It was now winter, a period when 
 hostilities ceased ; but the active spirit of Guise could 
 not rest, till he had taken revenge for the defeat of 
 St. Quentin, and he determined to make use of that 
 army of Swiss and Germans which the money of the 
 Parisians had raised. His design was to surprise Calais, 
 and thus not only punish queen Mary for espousing her 
 husband's quarrel, but achieve a feat for which the French 
 would assuredly be grateful, that of driving the English 
 from their last fortress on the Continent. It was cus- 
 tomary to weaken the garrison of Calais in the winter 
 months, when the overflowing x>f the marshes rendered 
 the town approachable only by a single causeway. De- 
 spite the warnings of king Philip, and of Wentworth 
 the governor, Calais was left with a garrison of merely 
 500 men. Guise fell suddenly upon it in January, 
 1558, took the external forts by assault, and then the 
 citadel : the town itself surrendered after a siege, or 
 rather attack, of eight days. 
 
 It now becomes necessary to recur to the history of 
 the reformation, since the reformers, as a party, hence- 
 forth began to influence not only the wishes of the 
 nation, and the remonstrances of parliament, but the 
 intrigues of the court itself. The protestants of Paris 
 had taken courage from the successful opposition of the 
 parliament to the edict establishing the independence of 
 ecclesiastical judges. The defeat of St. Quentin, and 
 the distress of the government, still more emboldened 
 them. Henry had ordained public processions in the 
 capital, in order to avert the wrath of Heaven, mani- 
 fested in the success of the enemy. The protestants 
 derided this mode of propitiating the Deity ; and, as if 
 to provoke comparison, celebrated their own simple rites 
 more openly. Four hundred of them met in the Rue 
 St. Jaques to celebrate the communion, and to hear one 
 of their noted preachers. Curiosity collected a crowd 
 of citizens of the old faith in the street. Zeal, by de- 
 grees, influenced them ; they menaced and besieged the 
 congregation within. The stoutest of the protestants.
 
 286 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1558. 
 
 however, rushed forth, and the mob fled from them. 
 The women and the timid portion of the congregation 
 remained in the house of assembly. Some had come 
 prepared to pass the night there for concealment, as well 
 as to avoid traversing the city at a late hour. The crowd 
 again collected, and again besieged these unfortunate 
 beings : breaking in upon them at length, they beat and 
 abused them, until a force arrived to take the unfortu- 
 nate sectaries to prison. The most atrocious calumnies 
 were, as usual, circulated concerning their ceremonies of 
 worship. These were said to be licentious, and even dia- 
 bolical : all the crimes of the German anabaptists were at- 
 tributed to them ; and some paillasses, which a few of the 
 infirm and aged votaries had brought, being found, were 
 adduced as proofs that the new doctrines were merely a 
 pretext and a cloak for gross corruption of morals. 
 
 Among the prisoners government was astonished to 
 find a number of respectable persons, ladies of the 
 court, and even attendants on the queen ; a circumstance 
 that threw some suspicion on Catherine of Medicis. The 
 cardinal of Lorraine was wroth. Anxious to commit 
 the knot of heretics to the flames, he still feared that if 
 he sent them before the parliament many would be ac- 
 quitted. He therefore employed a certain judicial police 
 officer, technically called a lieutenant civil, named Mus- 
 nier, to try the prisoners summarily, and in the case of 
 an appeal to parliament, to act himself as reporter of the 
 case, which would necessarily tell against the accused. 
 The parliament opposed all these manoeuvres of the car- 
 dinal, and took the trial of the prisoners into their own 
 hands. The case against them was too clear, and the 
 popular feeling, which now declared itself in the capital 
 against the reformers, too strong to be resisted. The 
 parliament accordingly condemned five of the congrega- 
 tion of protestants to be burned in the Place de Greve. 
 The rest recovered their liberty. 
 
 While the duke of Guise was engaged in his expedi- 
 tion against Calais, Henry fulfilled his promise of con- 
 voking what he called the states-general, in Paris.
 
 15inS. THE STATES-GENERAL CONVOKED. 28? 
 
 They wanted, nevertheless, the essential characteristic of 
 a national assembly, viz. representation. In lieu of 
 deputies, chosen expressly in the different provinces, and 
 sent with their usual store of grievances and instructions, 
 the mayors and sheriffs of the different great towns were 
 summoned to constitute the commons, or tiers etat. By 
 another innovation, the parliament of Paris, to whom 
 were joined the presidents of the provincial parliaments, 
 were constituted into a fourth estate, taking rank between 
 the noblesse and the commons. This was artful policy 
 on the part of the cardinal of Lorraine, who had especial 
 reasons for ingratiating himself with the parliament, and 
 winning it over to the views of the court. There was a 
 kind of precedent for the act, as in reality the judicial 
 body had formed a separate class in the assembly of 
 notables convened by Francis I., when the provost of 
 merchants and the sheriffs of Paris alone represented the 
 commons of the kingdom. It is easy to perceive how 
 this artifice of the court undermined the growing power 
 of the parliament, and deprived them for ever of the 
 pretence of representing the body of the people. Had 
 they understood their own interests, or been endowed 
 with sagacity to look into the future, they would have 
 considered it their highest privilege to be confounded 
 with the commons, and they would have defended it with 
 the stubbornness which they could display on more 
 trivial points. But vanity led them astray. It was for 
 their vanity that the court baited the hook, at which 
 they leaped : they considered themselves honoured by 
 being separated from the commons, and brought nearer 
 to the noblesse, with whom they afterwards succeeded 
 in getting themselves confounded. It was not, however, 
 with any profound views of undermining the parlia- 
 ment's authority that they were now nominally elevated 
 in grade ; it was for a purpose that will soon appear. 
 The assembly, replying to the king's message by its four 
 estates, thanked him in humble language : the address 
 of the judicial body was conveyed in the most high- 
 flown terms of gratitude; they made a grant of 3,000,000
 
 288 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1558. 
 
 of crowns, a tax to be raised under the name of a loan. 
 The sum was partitioned among the different communal 
 districts, each mayor and municipality levying their por- 
 tion. Notwithstanding an express prayer of the commons, 
 the most rich and powerful, otherwise the nobles, found 
 means to be relieved from their share, thus throwing the 
 extraordinary supply, as they did the ordinary taille, 
 upon the shoulders of the people. 
 
 When this assembly of states-general, as the historians 
 of the time call it, or of notables, as modern writers will 
 have it, was dissolved, the reason for flattering the par- 
 liament became obvious. The king held a bed of justice 
 in that court, and proposed an edict for establishing an 
 inquisition, after the manner of Rome; the cardinals of 
 Lorraine, Bourbon, and Chatillon being the inquisitors., 
 with full power to arrest, try, and condemn heretics. 
 The parliament were here taken by surprise. It was 
 ungracious to make resistance after the boon they had 
 received. Nevertheless they did demur, and so far mo- 
 dified the edict, as to abandon ecclesiastics altogether to 
 the jurisdiction of the inquisition, but to reserve still to 
 laymen the ancient and sacred privilege of appeal. 
 
 If schism could have been crushed, or put an end to 
 by violence, there was every cause for these severe edicts j 
 for it soon appeared that the most powerful men of the 
 kingdom had embraced the principles of Calvin. Great 
 jealousy rankled in the minds of the princes of the blood, 
 or rather of the house of Bourbon, to which the name 
 was confined. They were kept in a kind of disgrace, 
 without influence, and eclipsed by the Guises. The 
 eldest of the family had become king of Navarre, by 
 right of his wife. He resided in his dominions, and 
 there, in a provincial court, the emissaries of the re- 
 formation had insinuated themselves, unwatched, and 
 uncontrolled for the prelates of the kingdom universally 
 forsook their dioceses for the court and succeeded in 
 converting the king to the reformed faith. His brother, 
 the prince of Conde, followed the same example. Loyalty 
 or attachment to Henry might have prevented this step;
 
 1559- HENRY'S CONDUCT TO DANDELOT. 289 
 
 but of this they were destitute. Jealousy of the duke of 
 Guise, and of the cardinal of Lorraine, was .their predo- 
 minant feeling. 
 
 It was incumbent on these princes to repair to the 
 capital in order to attend the marriage of the dauphin, 
 Francis, with Mary, the young queen of Scots, which 
 took place in the spring of 1558. They there gave 
 courage and countenance to the protestants who were 
 emboldened to assemble publicly in the open air, chaunt- 
 ing the psalms of Marot, and indulging in all the enthu- 
 siasm of heterodox devotion. A serious tumult occurred 
 on one occasion, and the parliament were obliged to 
 excuse themselves for not enquiring into it by avowing 
 the terror which the menaces of the protestants against 
 informers produced. It was reported to the king, pro- 
 bably by the Guises, that Dandelot, brother of Coligny, 
 was a convert to the new religion. Henry, who esteemed 
 Dandelot, sent for him to Monceaux, a palace belonging 
 to Catherine of Medicis. At supper the monarch took 
 an opportunity to address his guest in a solemn tone of 
 affection, warned him of the accusation, and begged of 
 him at once to deny it, arid exculpate himself. Dan- 
 delot was moved by the monarch's earnestness and friend- 
 ship, but nevertheless resolutely avowed his crsed, and 
 scrupled not to declare " the sacrifice of the mass an 
 abomination." Henry started up at the word, and 
 thrust Dandelot from him as a viper. He instantly or- 
 dered him to prison, and gave his place of colonel-gene- 
 ral of the infantry to Montluc. The pope on learning 
 this was delighted at the prospect of so illustrious a 
 person suffering at the stake. But Henry relented, and 
 used every effort to bend Dandelot, who at length con- 
 sented that mass should be said in his prison. He was 
 immediately liberated and restored to favour. 
 
 The family of Guise was now all powerful. The 
 duke, popular for his victories and his liberality, was 
 soon to be still more popular for his orthodoxy. The 
 constable, his nephew Coligny, and the marechal St. 
 Andre, were prisoners of Philip, and none at court dared 
 
 VOL. i. u
 
 290 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 155Q. 
 
 to rival or oppose the duke of Guise and his brother the 
 cardinal. Such prosperity is apt to bring on the canker 
 of arrogance, which works its ruin. The duke failed in 
 the respect that he had hitherto paid to the duchess of 
 Valentinois. The mistress was not insensible to this, 
 and Guise had soon cause to regret his neglect. He took 
 the command of the army in May, and invested Thion- 
 ville, a fortress of Luxembourg, which he took. But the 
 French received about the same time a much more 
 serious check. The marechal de Termes, governor of 
 Calais, had invaded the literal of Flanders, and had 
 plundered Dunkirk. He thought proper, however, to 
 retreat before the count of Egmont. The delay caused 
 by the passage of the river Aa allowed the Spaniards 
 to come up with him near Gravelines, and to force him 
 to an action. It was fought with valour on both sides, 
 ""Iffld with uncertain success, until some English vessels 
 of war, cruising off the coast, heard, and made sail to- 
 wards the quarter whence proceeded the reports of artil- 
 lery. Perceiving the engagement, the English ascended 
 the river with the tide, and placed themselves so as to 
 cannonade the French. The consequence was, their 
 complete defeat, a disaster that cut short all the san- 
 guine hopes of conquest entertained by the duke of Guise, 
 and opened the way for peace. 
 
 The king regretted Montmorency, son bon compere, 
 f< his good gossip," as he used to call him. The arrogance 
 of Guise, the imperiousness of the cardinal of Lorraine 
 disgusted him ; and the duchess of Valentinois now took 
 care to aggravate his dislike. Henry kept up a familiar 
 correspondence with the constable, and informed him 
 of passing events, not disdaining to act as a kind of spy, 
 betraying the petty intrigues and views of the Guises. 
 The constable panted for his liberty, and resolved to 
 make use of his influence to obtain it. He was liber- 
 ated on parole. There was a cessation of hostilities ; 
 and commissioners met at Cercamp to arrange the con- 
 ditions of a treaty. The Spaniards presumed on Mont- 
 morency's influence, united with his desire to be free.
 
 1559- PEACE OF CHATEAU CAMBRESIS. 201 
 
 Their demands were exorbitant ; and the constable re- 
 turned to prison. Not long after, however, we find him 
 with the court at Beauvais, celebrating the marriage of 
 one of his sons with the grand-daughter of the duchess 
 of Valentinois. Negotiations for peace were not relaxed. 
 The ransom of the constable was fixed at 200,000 
 crowns; but it was to be diminished by one half, if peace 
 should be concluded through his medium, a stipulation 
 that leaves somewhat like a stain on Montmorency's 
 honour. 
 
 By the peace of Chateau Cambresis, signed April, 
 1559, France ceded all her conquests and claims in Italy 
 and Savoy. She restored Luxembourg and the Charolois. 
 In return she kept Metz, Toul, and Verdun, and what 
 was more important than all, Calais ; the restitution of 
 which, when Philip no longer insisted on, Elizabeth, the 
 new queen of England, was in no state to make good. 
 This peace, inveterately opposed by the Guises, and 
 cried down by their partisans, is generally condemned 
 by historians, who have taken up the cry as injurious to 
 France. Her interests, say they, were sacrificed to the 
 freedom of her superannuated constable. In this respect 
 they exaggerate, wilfully putting Calais out of consi- 
 deration, which was ceded more by Philip than by the 
 English. The treaty was sealed as usual by marriages. 
 
 Emmanuel Philibert, the hero of St. Quentin, and 
 now the restored duke of Savoy, espoused the king's 
 sister. His daughter Elizabeth, once the destined bride 
 of the infant of Spain, was given to that prince's father, 
 Philip ; and Claude, another princess, was betrothed 
 to the duke of Lorraine. 
 
 Had the life and reign of Henry II., destined to be 
 of not much longer duration, closed here, he would have 
 left the character of a severe but not a perfidious prince. 
 As yet, the noble sentiments, the chivalric feeling of 
 good faith, that Francis I. had professed and rendered 
 popular, prevailed. Neither Henry in all his weakness, 
 nor his ministers in ah 1 their ambition and mutual quar- 
 rels, had forgotten the plain laws of manly uprightness 
 u 2
 
 292 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1559' 
 
 and honour. These were destined soon to be forgotten. 
 To be brave, candid, generous, loyal, soon ceased to be 
 the mode. The volumes of chivalry were soon thrown 
 aside as puerile, and Machiavel was studied in their 
 place. Another ideal of perfection, and another model 
 of conduct, were established. By it dissimulation, cun- 
 ning, and fraud, provided they proved successful, were 
 declared to be the most estimable qualities. Superiority 
 of intellect was measured by depth of guile. All moral 
 considerations were of course set aside. The end was 
 in every case found to justify the means, however base; 
 and, as a natural consequence of such views, the end 
 that each politician proposed to attain by these extreme 
 measures soon dwindled down into mere self-interest. 
 
 No where, in fact, can be pointed out so sudden and 
 complete a change of national character as that which 
 took place in France at this epoch. The contemporaries 
 of Francis I. seem separated by centuries from the men 
 who figured in the days of his grandson : even the same 
 men present different characters m the two epochs. The 
 Guise of Henry II.'s reign is not the Guise of Charles IX. 
 What effected this sad change? Religion, Catholicism, 
 it must be answered : the established faith of Rome, 
 and its supporters, who finding that the common weapons 
 of reason and justice would not suffice to crush reform, 
 and that the common principles of religion and morality 
 could not be brought to bear against it, perverted both, 
 more, if possible, than they had already perverted them 
 in the iniquitous contest. 
 
 The act of Henry II., now about to be narrated, is the 
 first flagrant outrage against honour, the first open demon- 
 stration of Machiavelisin, and may well mark the point of 
 juncture between the two epochs, the substitution of 
 the law of fraud for the law of honour. The treaty 
 between Philip and Henry was not concluded without a 
 solemn agreement between the monarchs, sufficiently un- 
 necessary, indeed, considering their character, for extir- 
 pating heresy. The great obstacle in Paris was the 
 apathy or leniency of the parliament. Many of the
 
 1550. BED OP JUSTICE. 293 
 
 members were supposed to favour the reformation ; but 
 how were they to be discovered? The cardinal of Lorraine 
 conceived a plan for this purpose. It by no means be- 
 spoke a want of cunning. The only wonder is, how he 
 could persuade the king to become the instrument of such 
 baseness. But sacerdotal reasoning in such cases is 
 conclusive. 
 
 Henry, accompanied by the great officers of his court, 
 proceeded unexpectedly to the hall of parliament: he 
 took his seat, to the great astonishment of the members, 
 and formed what he called a bed of justice : he then, 
 hi a tone of the utmost kindness and condescension, 
 announced to them that he came merely to ask the advice 
 of the sage members of his parliament on an important 
 matter, viz. a due treatment of heresy. He urged all 
 present to offer~thelr~several opinions. They unsuspect- 
 ingly obeyed him. Those of the highest consideration, 
 the presidents Harlai, Seguier, and De Thou, boldly and 
 generously avowed their sentiments in favour of tolera- 
 tion ; professing .at the same time their attachment to the 
 faith of their fathers, but declaring that they deemed it 
 equally impolitic and unjust to punish the errors of 
 thought or the misgivings of conscience. The zealots, 
 on the other hand, recommended persecution, and cried 
 out for blood. Two counsellors, however, excited most 
 attention, by openly avowing their predilection for the 
 new opinions. These were Louis Faur and Anne 
 Dubourg. The latter complained, that whilst men were 
 dragged to the stake for simply praying to their God, 
 the orthodox were busied in blasphemy, perjury, 
 debauch, and adultery. The last words, though levelled 
 at the cardinal, were instantly referred to the king. His 
 anger instantly overcame his dissimulation. He ordered 
 Montgomery, captain of his guards, to arrest the two 
 counsellors and drag them to prison. The parliament saw 
 the trap which had been laid for them, and trembled. 
 Faur and Dubourg were both hanged. Several judges 
 were arrested, while others took flight. 
 
 A very short time after this a festival took place in 
 u 3
 
 29* HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1559- 
 
 honour of the late royal marriages. A tournament was 
 Henry's chosen pastime, and one was prepared in the 
 Rue St. Antoine on this occasion. The king and the 
 duke of Guise were among those who held the -lists 
 against all comers. They were victorious. The monarch 
 especially had signalised his address, and no new adven- 
 turer appeared. Henry, however, wished for more of 
 the game, and accordingly ordered Montgomery to 
 break a lance with him. The stout captain obeyed. 
 The king and he ran together : their lances shivered in 
 the shock, when a splinter penetrating Henry's vizor, 
 inflicted a deep wound over his left eye. He was imme- 
 diately carried to his palace, where he lingered for twelve 
 days, and expired on the 10th of July, 1559- Mont- 
 gomery, the innocent cause of the disaster, thought it 
 prudent to fly. He was taken some years after, and 
 executed by the cruel Catherine of Medicis, in most un- 
 just retribution. 
 
 The character of Henry was neither so distinctly 
 pronounced nor so peculiar as to require a delineation 
 separate from his reign. He wanted the splendid qua- 
 lities of his parent, nor did he compensate for that want 
 by more solid qualities. In the bustle, the feats, and 
 the reverses of the reign of Francis, we are apt to over- 
 look his policy, or forget that he had any, until the reign 
 of his son places in strong contrast his prudence in 
 maintaining the ascendancy over his ministers, and keep- 
 ing himself superior to court intrigue. Henry allowed 
 himself to be so overcome and controlled by favouritism 
 and arrogance, that we can never look for causes in 
 his individual will or views. These were lost in the 
 stronger wills of the chiefs who surrounded him. He 
 was more of a bigot than Francis, as Philip was more 
 of a bigot than Charles, and for the same reason. The 
 priesthood that had their part in the education of the 
 princes inspired them from the cradle with an abhor- 
 rence for heretics, which could not have been acquired 
 by their sires without being tempered with the expe- 
 rience of manhood. Yet Henry did not deal generally
 
 1559- ACCESSION OF FRANCIS n. 295 
 
 in bloodshed like his father. The population of a whole 
 province was not extirpated in his reign. Even to his 
 last mean and culpable deceit, the bed of justice, he was 
 absolutely forced by the cardinal of Lorraine, " who 
 held to him such language," said Vieilleville, "such com- 
 minations of the ire of God, that he esteemed himself 
 already damned if he forbore to go." 
 
 CHAP. VIII. 
 
 15591574. 
 
 FRANCIS THE SECOND AND CHARLES THE NINTH. 
 
 IF the late king, of a character naturally masculine, was 
 overborne and nullified by the nobles his contemporaries, 
 who divided the court, it is not to be supposed that his 
 son, Francis II., a youth of sixteen, could really hold 
 much authority. The thoughts of the young monarch 
 were all centred in his lovely queen, Mary of Scotland, 
 who, fond of gaiety and pleasure, naturally transferred 
 to her uncles of Guise and Lorraine the influence per- 
 taining to her new dignity : they, in fact, became com- 
 plete masters of king and kingdom. Montmorency, 
 received coldly, was allowed once more to retire to 
 Chantilly. The duchess of Valentinois was also exiled ; 
 her jewels and estates were confiscated in favour of 
 Catherine of Medicis, who, contented with this triumph 
 over her rival, did not yet dare to dispute the ascend- 
 ancy of Guise. The neglect of the court that had 
 weighed on the princes of the blood, the king of Navarre 
 and his brother of Conde, was now aggravated by insult. 
 The family were, however, of a tranquil, generous tem- 
 per, brave indeed, but very unfit for conspiracies and for 
 court intrigue. The king of Navarre was apathetic and 
 fond of ease ; the prince of . Conde was given to plea- 
 sure. The nephews of Montmorency, Coligny the 
 u 4
 
 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 admiral, and Dandelot, were not of this pacific dis- 
 position : they were indignant at their uncle's disgrace, 
 and discontented with their own. Communicating their 
 griefs to the Bourbons, they stirred the dormant passions 
 of those princes, and imparted to them their own rest- 
 less and ambitious spirit. Conde, in particular, was 
 won by Coligny, a man of a bold and imposing cha- 
 racter. They consulted how best they might humble the 
 Guises, and dispossess them of power: the malcontents 
 were all inclined to the reformation, except Montmorency. 
 They resolved to take advantage of this important cir- 
 cumstance, and place themselves at the head of a reli- 
 gious faction hostile to the court : this was unfortunate 
 for France. The cause of civil liberty had been be- 
 trayed and lost in the reigns of Charles V. and VI. by 
 the princes of the blood, who put themselves at the head 
 of the popular parties, and confounded the interests of 
 the people with their own. Now religious freedom was 
 doomed to perish in the same manner. Instead of being 
 allowed to make gradual progress in the public mind till 
 it had assumed force to command respect and conquer 
 intolerance, it was prematurely excited to revolt by the 
 intrigues of discontented princes. A conspiracy against 
 royalty became the first act of protestantism in France ; 
 and thus hundreds of loyal subjects and rational minds 
 were alienated from it, and their dislike was strength- 
 ened by prejudice. The court, with some reason, hence- 
 forth declared against it an eternal war. 
 
 Many of the noblesse had already joined the party of 
 Coligny and of Conde, though the king of Navarre and 
 the constable hesitated and held back. La Rochefou- 
 cault, Jarnac, and the vidame de Chartres declared for 
 them. An atrocious impertinence on the part of the 
 cardinal of Lorraine, opportunely occurring, swelled this 
 band of foes to the Guises. Tormented by demands, 
 some for debts due, and some for places promised, the 
 all-powerful prelate in a fit of spleen published a pro- 
 clamation by sound of trumpet, ordering all petitioners, 
 of whatever rank, to quit Fontainebleau, where the court
 
 156'0. MEETINGS OF THE PROTESTANT PARTY. 2$7 
 
 then was, without delay, and this under pain of being 
 hanged. The cardinal, perhaps, meant to be facetious ; 
 for the court instantly became a desert. The host of 
 noble suitors, proud though mendicant, could not forgive 
 the threat, and many joined the discontented. 
 
 The party had numerous meetings in the chateau of 
 Vendome, and in other places. La Renaudie, a gentle- 
 man of Perigord, and an agent of Coligny, was employed 
 by him to be the ostensible leader. A meeting was 
 secretly convened at Nantes, where the protestants and 
 enemies of Guise united to the number of 600, and 
 took counsel together. It was agreed to attack Blois, 
 where the king then was, obtain possession of his per- 
 son, and get rid of the odious Guises. Amongst such a 
 host of conspirators secrecy was almost impossible : the 
 duke received warning of the plot, and removed the 
 court to the castle of Amboise. The cardinal of Lor- 
 raine was terrified: he proposed to summon the ban and 
 arriere-ban, and gather an army against the rebels. All 
 the anxiety of Guise, on the contrary, was, that his ene- 
 mies should show themselves ; and for that purpose he 
 affected confidence. Coligny and Conde both repaired to 
 Amboise, where Guise received them without betraying 
 the least mark of suspicion, and he appointed them to 
 different posts of defence about the castle ; each, how- 
 ever, watched by his own trusty partisans. The rising 
 had been appointed for the 15th of March: it took 
 place on the 1 6'th : the baron of Castelnau seizing the 
 castle of Noize, not far from Amboise. La Renaudie 
 was marching to join him : they hoped to surprise the 
 court ; when on a sudden the royal troops sent by Guise 
 made their appearance, attacked la Renaudie, slew him, 
 and besieged Noize. 
 
 An amnesty was now published in the hope of allay- 
 ing the insurrection : but, as if in contempt of it, the 
 chateau of Amboise was attacked on that very night. 
 All the vigilance and valour of Guise were required to 
 repel the rebels. By secret information he had time 
 to prepare for them, and they were routed. The am-
 
 298 . HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1560. 
 
 nesty was revoked, and no mercy was shown to the 
 captives. Twelve hundred of them were hanged, or 
 otherwise despatched : even Castelnau, who had surren- 
 dered on the faith of the duke of Nemours, was executed 
 in the presence of the court. In the confessions forced 
 from many by the torture, none of the real chiefs of the 
 conspiracy were mentioned except the prince of Conde. 
 History is even in doubt to decide if those chiefs were 
 concerned in the attack: the protestant party will not admit 
 that they by this rash and unwarrantable act produced the 
 civil war. Conde was brought to trial in presence of 
 the court : he disdained to defend himself but as a 
 knight. " Let my accuser appear," said he, regarding 
 Guise, " and I will prove upon him, in single combat, 
 that he is the traitor, not I, and that he is the true 
 enemy of the king and of the monarchy." Guise rose 
 to reply to this challenge : " I can "no longer suffer 
 these dark suspicions to weigh upon so valiant a prince ; 
 I myself will be his second in the combat against who- 
 ever accuses him." Most of those present were as per- 
 plexed, as no doubt the reader is, to comprehend this 
 conduct in the duke of Guise. Some called it chivalric 
 generosity, others the perfection of guile. 
 
 In the trouble excited by the conspiracy, the young 
 king, for the first time, manifested an opinion of his 
 own. He was shocked at finding himself the object of 
 hatred, and he began to mistrust the Guises. The queen- 
 mother, Catherine, after the example of her son, also 
 took courage ; and the chancellor Olivier, as well as 
 Vieilleville and other courtiers, joined her party. Hence 
 arose the first amnesty, a concession on the part of the 
 Guises which was recompensed by the duke's appoint- 
 ment as lieutenant-general of the kingdom. The exe- 
 cutions which followed, especially that of Castelnau, 
 which the court witnessed, shocked the princesses (the 
 cardinal Lorraine hoped that the sight of heretic blood 
 would have had an opposite effect), and they, with the 
 young queen Mary, flung themselves into the scale of 
 mercy. Guise was unable to resist this influence : he
 
 1560. THE STATES- GENERAL SUMMONED. 2 99 
 
 saw that the prince of Concle must in consequence be 
 released, and he sought to take to himself full credit for a 
 generosity that was forced upon him. Here then Catherine 
 of Medicis, for the first time, appears as the leader of a 
 party. Notwithstanding our prejudices against her, she 
 appears also, on this first occasion, as the supporter of 
 mercy. 
 
 The continued mistrust and independence of the 
 Guises shown on the part of the queen-mother and the 
 young king produced an assembly of notables, summoned 
 soon afterwards at Fontainebleau to take the affairs of the 
 kingdom into consideration. In it the protestant leaders, 
 even prelates, spoke openly the apology for reformation ; 
 and Coligny demanded tolerance for the sectarians, re- 
 lying upon the neutrality of the court. Guise could no 
 longer command his temper, as he did at Amboise : 
 mutual recrimination and menaces were heard in the 
 assembly of peace. Both parties struggled in their dis- 
 courses to convince the monarch of the justice and 
 expediency of their counsels; but the weakness and 
 indecision of the court was at the same time seen by 
 both ; and an appeal of equal earnestness was made by 
 them to the people. The protestants continually cried 
 out for the states-general, and a national council. And 
 now the cardinal of Lorraine forgot his nature so far as 
 to join in the cry, and make the same demand. The 
 independent attitude of the queen rather forced the 
 Guises to strengthen themselves by popularity. 
 
 Such appear the true reasons why the states-general 
 were summoned to meet at Orleans, in October, 1560. 
 Historians in general perceive in them merely a snare to 
 catch the protestant chiefs. They served that purpose 
 indeed, but they had been already summoned ere Conde, 
 just released, could have recommenced his intrigues. 
 The arrogance and boldness of the protestants, and of 
 Coligny, in the assembly of notables at Fontainebleau, 
 were revolting to Catherine and Francis. Between 
 August, when that assembly was held, and October, 
 the period for the assembling of the states, the Guises
 
 300 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1 566. 
 
 had completely won the court to themselves, and re- 
 gained their influence. The prince of Conde attempted 
 during that interval to seize Lyons, and convert it into 
 a strong hold of rebellion. He failed, however ; and his 
 traitorous enterprise became thoroughly known at court. 
 Notwithstanding this, the brothers of Bourbon, the king 
 of Navarre, and the prince, were induced to join the 
 assembly of the states. Though full of mistrust, they 
 still ventured on the secret favour or neutrality of 
 Catherine, who joined in enticing them to come. They 
 were ill received by the king. Catherine was troubled, 
 and shed tears on beholding them, knowing them to be 
 victims betrayed by their confidence in her. The king's 
 mind had been filled with the bitterest calumnies against 
 them : he accused Conde of having attempted his life, 
 and ended by committing that prince to prison. The 
 king of Navarre instantly complained, and expostulated 
 with the queen-mother j but she could not now retract 
 the consent she had given, or unbend the mind of the 
 young monarch. Conde was tried by a commission, 
 and refusing to answer, was condemned to death. The 
 day was appointed for the execution, and Catherine of 
 Medicis betrayed to all who approached the agony ami 
 misgivings of her mind. Historians will maintain that 
 this sensibility on the part of Catherine was affected : 
 they think, with Davila, that it would be a dishonour, or 
 at least an inconsistency, in the queen, that she should 
 have felt a particle of the natural tenderness of her sex, 
 even in the commencement of her political career. I 
 beg to think that she was sincere in now wishing to 
 save the life of Conde ; and fortune placed this in her 
 power. The young king was stricken with sudden ill- 
 ness, arising, it is supposed, from the formation of an 
 abscess in his head. The supreme authority rested with 
 the queen-mother. The Guises urged her to execute 
 the sentence upon Conde ; but she hesitated, and 
 resolved to save him. She determined, however, to turn 
 her mercy to advantage ; summoning the king of Navarre, 
 she offered to spare the life of his brother, provided
 
 1560. ACCESSION OF CHARLES ix. 301 
 
 he signed an agreement renouncing all claim to the re- 
 gency in case of the young king's death. Navarre signed ; 
 and Francis II. expired on the 5th of December, 1 560. 
 
 Charles IX., a boy ten years of age, now succeeded 
 his brother Francis. Catherine of Medicis, according to 
 her promise, liberated the prince of Conde ; and as the 
 king of Navarre, according to his promise, supported the 
 queen's pretensions, she took upon her .the office of 
 regent. The Guises, though shorn of their paramount 
 influence, and mortified by the escape of Conde, were 
 still formidable as a party. To make the balance more 
 even, Catherine recalled to court the veteran constable, 
 Montmorency. Nothing could be more successful or 
 happy than the policy of this princess hitherto, nor was 
 it as yet made subservient to her own cruel measures : 
 her interest as well as that of the kingdom recommended 
 to her a middle course, between the extremes of con- 
 tending parties. This was a task that required infinite 
 prudence, and led to the necessary vices of dissimulation 
 and guile : these, combined with the measures of blood 
 in which she was afterwards induced to join, have ren- 
 dered her in the eyes of posterity a very monster of cruelty 
 and deceit. Her enemies have exaggerated their represent- 
 ations from hate ; her friend and secretary, Davila, has 
 done the same from a preposterous desire to raise the in- 
 tellectual character of his mistress at the expense of her 
 moral worth. Whatever differences there may be on this 
 point, there can be none as to the talents of Catherine : 
 her choice of followers is an ample proof of them. One 
 of the first uses she made of her incipient influence was 
 to raise de 1'Hopital to the chancellorship, against the 
 wishes of Guise ; and when we record that this upright 
 man was now her friend and counsellor, the fact goes 
 far to prove, that she was not at this early stage such a 
 demon of guile as she has been represented. 
 
 There is no task more impracticable than that of 
 holding the balance between two zealous and active par- 
 ties. The states now assembled leaned against the 
 Guises. The king of Navarre proposed, as a measure
 
 302 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1561. 
 
 of offence, to extinguish the debts of the crown, now 
 considerable, by resuming the grants of the two last 
 reigns. This blow was chiefly aimed at the Guises, 
 but it also reached the marechal St. Andre and the 
 constable. -Catherine in vain endeavoured to stifle the 
 imprudent proposal. Montmorency was avaricious : he 
 felt himself in the same predicament with Guise, in being 
 forced to render up his acquisitions. Sympathy united 
 them. The constable abandoned the party of his 
 nephews, and also that of the reformation to which he ever 
 had a repugnance ; and thus was formed, of the constable, 
 the marechal, and Guise, a triumvirate that disquieted 
 Catherine and menaced the protestants. The queen 
 immediately determined to strengthen the protestant 
 side; and an edict appeared, granting them some slight 
 favour, and substituting the pain of banishment for that 
 of death in common cases of heresy. The Guises, on 
 their part, having secured the constable, and opened a 
 communication with Spain, resolved no longer to trouble 
 themselves with petty court intrigue, but leaving Ca- 
 therine to pursue her o.wn plans, waited till some fla- 
 grant blunder of hers would afford them an opportunity 
 to interfere with advantage. The queen took the quiet 
 and apparent content of the Guises to be real. She 
 proposed an accommodation between the duke and Conde, 
 which took place in form, the princes separating as ene- 
 mies no less bitter than before. The queen then flat- 
 tered herself that all went on admirably. In concert 
 with her counsellor, de 1'Hopital, she pursued, and 
 sincerely pursued, the beneficent work of establishing 
 religious peace and toleration. The divines of both 
 persuasions met at Poissy. The cardinal of Lorraine 
 and Theodore Beza disputed, and, as usual, separated 
 each more bigoted than he was when he came. A de- 
 putation from the different parliaments met at the same 
 time at St. Germain. Under the influence of the chan- 
 cellor they approved of toleration ; and, strengthened 
 by their approval, the government issued the famous 
 edict of January, 1562, granting tolerance to the Hu*
 
 15G1. CIVIL WAR. 303 
 
 guenots, and allowing them to assemble outside the walls 
 of towns. 
 
 This was the signal for the Guises. They departed 
 from the capital in indignation, and retired to Lorraine, 
 that they might not be witnesses of the triumph of he- 
 resy. While Catherine had been engaged in her phi- 
 lanthropic endeavours at toleration, they were not idly 
 employed in winning over to their side the weak-minded 
 king of Navarre. Catherine, on other occasions, had 
 courted him, and long held him by the charms of one 
 of her maids of honour, a culpable mode of influence 
 much practised by the queen-mother. At the present 
 conjuncture she could not have suspected that Anthony 
 of Bourbon, unfixed as he was in his religious opinions, 
 could desert his brother, his family, and the Huguenot 
 party, with which he had so long acted. But the pro- 
 mise of their restoring that part of Navarre beyond the 
 Pyrenees, which Spain had conquered, was held out by 
 tbft_jjiiises. ajid Philip; and the king was dupe enough to 
 trust to it. 
 
 -Th"e"two parties were by this time excited throughout 
 France to the highest pitch of mutual exasperation. Al- 
 ready, numbers of petty insurrections, skirmishes, mur- 
 ders, the usual preludes to civil war, had occurred. 
 The court having retired to the queen's country-house 
 of Monceaux, the duke of Guise determined to try the 
 pulse of the Parisian population; and for that purpose 
 set out thither. During his journey an event occurred, 
 which fell like a spark upon the combustible minds of 
 the Huguenots, and served as a signal for war. In pass- 
 yig through the little town of Vassy, on the borders of 
 Champagne, at an hour when the protestants were as- 
 sembled, outside the walls according to the edict, in 
 prayer, the duke felt especially indignant : his suite 
 partook of his resentment, and began to insult the crowd. 
 From insults, blows ensued. The duke ran to quell 
 or to see the disturbance, and was struck in the cheek. 
 The sight of his blood called forth fresh anger on the 
 part of his followers: troops joined him; and a mas-
 
 304 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 156l. 
 
 sacre of the unfortunate inhabitants of Vassy took place, 
 which the duke was either unable or unwilling to stop. 
 The protestants were aroused by accounts of this event. 
 They began, however, by sending a deputation to the 
 queen. The king of Navarre, in his stupid zeal, insulted 
 them, and excused the massacre. Theodore Beza an- 
 swered him, with a happy allocution, " that the protest- 
 ants, if they could not defend themselves, had, at least, 
 the strength to endure ; and that religious liberty was an 
 anvil which had worn put many hammers." 
 
 The entry of the duke of Guise excited the greatest 
 enthusiasm among the Parisians. They declared with 
 one voice against the Huguenots ; and he was now as- 
 sured that catholic opinion would find a fortress in the 
 capital. Their demonstrations of zeal were so extreme, 
 that Catherine of Medicis thought it best to retire to 
 Melun, and thence to Fontainebleau. But even here she 
 was not safe. The triumvirate marched to Fontaine- 
 bleau, and brought back the king and the queen-mother 
 to Paris. The prince of Conde at the news took posses- 
 sion of Orleans, summoned his partisans, and made that 
 town the head-quarters of the Huguenots, as the capital 
 was of the catholics. In the south and west of France, 
 the Huguenots had the advantage ; these provinces de- 
 clared for them. The superiority of the catholics con- 
 sisted in the possession of the king, the x capital, and the 
 greater part of the regular troops. There was still a he- 
 sitation in commencing the war. Catherine, who clung 
 tenaciously to power, and who, in order to retain it, 
 now joined, or affected to join, the triumvirate, tried to 
 negotiate with Conde. The prince was weak enough to 
 listen to her ; but his followers would not allow of his 
 becoming a dupe. Dandelot uttered a piece of advice, 
 that might be true of any quarrels save religious dis- 
 putes. " We can never be friends with the catholics," 
 said he, "till we fight our quarrel out." Unhappily, 
 it was not by combat, but by massacre, that the war 
 commenced. The Huguenots took Beaugenci, and com- 
 mitted every atrocity: their enemies retaliated; and
 
 1561. BATTLE OF DREUX. 305 
 
 hus a religious war at once assumed all that savage 
 character which usually distinguishes it. At the same 
 time the prince of Conde', to counterbalance the aid 
 which Philip of Spain now openly held out to the Guises, 
 concluded a treaty with queen Elizabeth, to whom he 
 delivered Havre de Grace in return for a corps of 6000 
 men. 
 
 The catholics opened the campaign in the autumn with 
 the siege of Rouen, where Montgomeri commanded. The 
 chiefs would not lose sight of Catherine and the king, 
 who accordingly accompanied them ; and the queen, 
 surrounded by gaiety and beauty, showed every sign of 
 contentment and zealous orthodoxy. The town was vi- 
 gorously attacked and gallantly defended. Many women 
 of the protestants were slain. In one of the assaults, 
 Anthony of Bourbon, king of Navarre, received a wound 
 which proved mortal. This weak prince, slain in the 
 ranks of the catholics, left an infant son, who, under the 
 care of his mother, Jeanne d'Albret, was reared to be the 
 support and glory of the protestant cause. This infant 
 was the future Henry IV. Rouen at length surrendered, 
 Montgomeri escaped ; but ten of the principal hugue- 
 not inhabitants were executed. Conde used reprisals 
 at Orleans ; and thus the parties warred, each spilling 
 blood upon scaffolds of its own erection. 
 
 The prince, however, having received a reinforcement 
 of 7000 Germans under his brother Dandelot, at length 
 marched out of Orleans. He first insulted the capital, 
 burning the villages in its vicinity, and then turned to- 
 wards Normandy, in order to draw near to the English. 
 He was followed by the constable; and the first battle 
 was fought on the 19th of December, at Dreux. The 
 principal force of Conde was in cavalry, his infantry 
 being chiefly Germans, a circumstance which indicates 
 that it was among the middling class, or the wealthy 
 burgesses, that the soldiers of the reformation were re- 
 cruited. Vieilleville corroborates this. The royal army 
 was composed chiefly of infantry, in number about 
 1 8,000, and in this respect superior to the enemy. The 
 VOL. i. x
 
 306 HISTORY OF FHAXCE. 1562. 
 
 two armies contemplated each other for a considerable 
 time, till at last Conde, with the courage of a captain, 
 but with none of the method or foresight of the general, 
 fell upon the main body under the constable. He routed 
 it after an obstinate struggle, in which the Swiss, of whom 
 it was chiefly composed, rallied at each opportunity. The 
 constable, however, was taken, and led off the field, 
 Guise, who was on the right, never moving to his suc- 
 cour. The duke waited until the huguenots were com- 
 pletely wearied and exhausted with the resistance of the 
 Swiss, and then advanced with his fresh division to 
 restore the action. This he effected with the utmost 
 success. The undisciplined cavalry of Conde were in 
 total disorder ; Guise swept them before him, and took the 
 prince prisoner. The admiral Coligny made good his 
 retreat, however, with the Germans, and rallied the 
 fugitives. The marechal St. Andre, in endeavouring 
 to harass him, was taken and slain. The singularity 
 of the battle of Dreux was, that each of the two generals 
 became prisoner to the opposite party. Guise gained 
 both ways ; not less by the removal of the constable, 
 whose rank entitled him always to the superior com- 
 mand, than by the captivity of Conde. This prince 
 was treated with the utmost generosity by his rival : 
 they shared the same tent, the same bed ; and while 
 Conde remained wakeful from the strangeness of his 
 position, Guise, he declared, enjoyed the most profound 
 sleep. There were, indeed, heroic traits about the duke 
 of Guise, that mark him to have been naturally of a 
 generous and noble disposition. It appears that, espe- 
 cially when in arms and away from his brother, he 
 could shake off the hard-heartedness, the guile, and even 
 the ambition, which in the cabinet rose to stifle every 
 better quality. But we are now engaged with scenes 
 and men that would demand, if full justice were to be 
 done to them, the amplest page of history. Guise fol- 
 lowed up his victories by laying siege to Orleans. 
 While he was engaged in reducing this strong hold 
 of his enemies a huguenot gentleman named Poltrot
 
 1563. EDICT OF ABIBOISE. 307 
 
 treacherously shot the duke with his pistol. He lingered 
 nine days, and expired with exemplary fortitude and 
 piety. He was a brave and great man, with such power 
 of nerve and concentrated pride, that, notwithstanding 
 his equivocal rank in France, the stern constable himself 
 and the princes of the blood quailed before him. His 
 virtues were his own ; his vices those of his party. The 
 death and captivity of the chiefs on both sides, Coh'gny 
 excepted, necessarily brought on an accommodation. 
 Peace was declared ; and the edict of Amboise, issued 
 in March, 1563, granted full liberty of worship to the 
 protestants within the towns of which they were in 
 possession up to that day. Thus ended the first religious 
 war, which, in addition to the events we have recorded, 
 deluged the entire south of France with the blood of 
 the contending parties. 
 
 The conclusion of peace restored Catherine of Medicis 
 to the supreme authority. In order to exercise it under 
 a less invidious title than that of regent, the parliament 
 of Rouen, by her order, declared king Charles, now 
 thirteen years of age, to have attained his majority. 
 Reared by the crafty and prudent Catherine, he early 
 acquired, in perfection, the power of dissimulation ; but 
 he never imbibed that utter indifference to both religious 
 parties which distinguishedhis mother, and which allowed 
 her to consult her own interest or the public good in leagu- 
 ing with either, or in balancing and alternating between 
 them. On the contrary, Charles, thrown among the 
 catholic party at an age when a bias is soon and strongly 
 gained, amidst the bustle of war and of a camp, which 
 pleased him, soon imbibed the zeal of the partisans of 
 Guise. He had the sagacity to perceive that orthodoxy 
 was much more favourable than the doctrines of the 
 reformers to his kingly authority. A worse effect on 
 his character was produced by sights of cruelty ; for at 
 this tender age he beheld the atrocities practised on the 
 protestants at the siege of Rouen, and during the cam-, 
 paign. The young king was thus led to adopt, in hip 
 x 2
 
 308 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1563. 
 
 sober counsels, the sanguinary measures that the heat of 
 war engendered but could not excuse. 
 
 This decision of her son in favour of the catholics 
 had a very great influence in finally drawing over Ca- 
 therine to that party. Other causes also impelled her : 
 the catholics were without leaders; there was a place, 
 therefore, for her at their head : and, in a little time, 
 the pope and Philip of Spain both declared so strongly 
 against the protestants, that the queen was driven, from 
 a principle of self-preservation, to adopt the winning 
 side. This abandonment of her impartiality, Catherine, 
 however, delayed as long as it was in'her power. After 
 the conclusion of peace, she endeavoured to soothe Conde, 
 and win him over to moderate demands; thus preparing 
 the way for an accommodation. Conde was a man of 
 pleasure, prone to indolence, in which he gladly indulged 
 whenever an interval occurred in war or in business. 
 Catherine held out to him her usual bait, the charms of 
 her maids of honour ; and Conde loitered, like another 
 Rinaldo, in the toils of this Armida, until the ministers 
 of the reformed religion recalled him from licentiousness 
 and compelled him to marry. These stern disciplin- 
 arians were said to have hanged one of their flock for 
 the crime of adultery. This alone was enough to alien- 
 ate the courtiers of France and the demoiselles of Ca- 
 therine. 
 
 The edict of Amboise had not long been issued, when 
 a modification of it was found necessary. That edict 
 had allowed to the protestants the celebration of their 
 worship in towns which they possessed. It was found 
 that several bishops and clergy, construing its terms in 
 their favour, had established the new rites in their cathe- 
 drals and churches. This would have outraged the pope 
 and the catholic princes. Indeed, notwithstanding the 
 clamours of the protestants, so great a concession was 
 not to be expected ; and accordingly the privilege was 
 withdrawn. The ancient cathedrals were not allowed 
 to become temples of the reformed religion. New differ- 
 ences consequently arose : the Guises accused Coligny of
 
 1564. EDICT OF ROUSSILLON. 309 
 
 instigating the murder of the duke ; and the admiral 
 arrived to answer the charge with his suite, which almost 
 amounted to an army. Either Catherine or Charles 
 himself took this opportunity of increasing the usual 
 royal guard of 100 Swiss, into upwards of 1000 men. 
 The old constable came to instigate the Parisians, and 
 a tumult ensued, in which lives were lost. 
 
 In the following year, 1564, the young king resolved 
 on making a progress through his dominions, especially 
 in the south. The cardinal of Lorraine went to Rome 
 at the same time, and Charles was met at Bayonne by 
 his sister, the queen of Spain, and the duke of Alva. 
 This meeting, in which the minister of Philip commu- 
 nicated the views of his master, completed in the mind 
 of Charles his hatred of the reformation, and instructed 
 him concerning the means by which it might be event- 
 ually crushed. The edict of Roussillon *, which ap- 
 peared while the court was in the south, imposed new 
 restrictions on the toleration granted by that of Amboise j 
 so that, as Pasquier observes, " edicts took more from 
 the protestants in peace than force could take from 
 them in war." The huguenots, therefore, despairing 
 of impartiality or justice from the court, began already 
 to look forward to another struggle. 
 
 During this state of things an assembly of notables 
 was held at Moulins. Catherine, who, notwithstanding 
 her sagacity, very ofteii mistook the form for the reality, 
 insisted on a public reconciliation between the Guises 
 and Coligny. It took place at her bidding ; the cardinal 
 and the admiral embraced; but young Henry duke of 
 Guise showed even there, by his cold and mistrustful 
 demeanour, that his first ideas were those of vengeance 
 and hatred. It was in this assembly, that the chancellor 
 de 1'Hopital proposed his improvements in the admin- 
 istration of justice. Whilst all others, prince, noble, 
 and functionary, were absorbed in the spirit of religious 
 party, de 1'Hopital alone, professing at once Catholicism 
 
 * It was this edict which ordered that the year should commence on the 
 1st of January, instead of, as heretofore, commencing at Easter. 
 
 x 3
 
 310 HISTORY OF FRAXCE. 1567- 
 
 and tolerance, but unable to obtain attention, followed 
 the unambitious track of judicial amelioration. 
 
 Religious troubles, similar to those of France, began 
 to agitate the Low Countries. Philip, resolving to pre- 
 sent a high example to France, established the inquisi- 
 tion among his Belgic subjects in all its vigour ; and as 
 this only made matters worse, the duke of Alva was 
 despatched to those provinces with an army in 1567- 
 The French court affected to fear this force, and raised 
 an army as if against it. When the duke of Alva, 
 however, appeared on the frontiers of France, he was 
 treated as a friend ; and the huguenots immediately 
 perceived that the troops were levied, not for the defence 
 of the kingdom, but for the oppression of themselves. 
 They accordingly leagued and armed in secret, deter- 
 mined to meet the perfidy of the court with correspond- 
 ent guile. Their consultations ended in a project to 
 surprise the court at Monceaux, and get possession of 
 the king. It failed, however, as the similar plot had 
 previously failed at Amboise, through the postponement 
 of a single day. The queen had warning ; the Swiss 
 were summoned ; and the court retired to Meaux, and 
 from thence to Paris, pursued and menaced by the dis- 
 appointed Cond^. 
 
 Thus commenced the second religious war, in Sep- 
 tember, 1567- " Catherine," says Renault, " caused 
 the first civil strife by favouring the reformers, and the 
 second by irritating them." She was now at least zea- 
 lously hostile to them. She had been provoked by the 
 numerous calumnies and libels which the huguenots di- 
 rected against her, and she cordially joined in the opinions 
 of her young son, and of his and her ally, Philip. She 
 no longer sought an habitual adviser in the moderate de 
 1'Hopital, who was of opinion that the reformers were 
 unfairly treated. The chancellor always asserted their 
 loyalty. After their attempt to surprise Meaux, the 
 queen asked de 1'Hopital " Would he now answer 
 that their sole aim was to serve the king ?" " Yes,
 
 1567- SECOND RELIGIOUS WAR. 311 
 
 rnadam," replied he, " if you assure me that they will 
 be treated with good faith." 
 
 Conde took up his quarters at St. Denis. The ca- 
 tholics under Montmoreucy were posted at La Chapelle, 
 a village that is now the suburb of Paris on that side. 
 The constable wished as usual to procrastinate, but the 
 impatience of the Parisians forced him to attack. The 
 battle was fought in the plain of St. Denis : it began 
 with a cannonade ; but the huguenots, to avoid the 
 destructive effects of the artillery, charged the Parisians 
 furiously, and routed them. Their flight left the con- 
 stable unsupported ; Conde turned on him his victorious 
 cavalry, and Montmorency defended his position, when 
 Stuart, the captain of the Scotch company in the service 
 of the huguenots, coming up close to the constable, 
 against whom he had cause of hate, fired his pistol and 
 shot him. A furious and confused melee, somewhat 
 like an Homeric fight, immediately took place around 
 the dead body of the constable the huguenots with 
 savage zeal seeking to carry it off. They were beaten, 
 however, and driven from the field in the attempt. 
 Thus fell, in civil strife, and engaged against his own 
 nephews, the veteran warrior of France. His years, his 
 hardihood, and his name, have rendered him deservedly 
 celebrated. His defence of Provence against Charles V. 
 is particularly memorable. By French historians he is 
 characterised in terms of the highest encomium : they 
 commend his sternness, his courage, his orthodoxy, and 
 forget that avarice and selfishness sullied and almost 
 neutralised each of his virtues. 
 
 The constable's death was a victory to Conde, who 
 was able to offer battle to the catholics on the following 
 day. He denied having lost that of St. Denis. Young 
 Charles, who was witness to a dispute on this point, 
 asked Vieilleville "who had won the battle?" 
 " Neither catholic nor protestant," responded the mare- 
 chal ; " it is the king of Spain who has won by our dis- 
 cord." The huguenots had neither pay nor provisions, 
 and were therefore obliged to quit the vicinage of Paris, 
 x 4
 
 512 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1568. 
 
 directing their course across Lorraine towards the fron- 
 tier of Germany, as they expected a body of auxiliaries 
 from that country. They were pursued, but not much 
 harassed in their retreat. Catherine endeavoured in- 
 cessantly to decoy them into negotiations, the depart- 
 ment of warfare which she felt herself most competent 
 to direct. She restrained the warlike disposition of the 
 king ; arguing with truth, that, from the violent animo- 
 sities of the time, the leaders of armies marched to meet a 
 certain fate, either in battle or at the hand of the assassin. 
 The king's brother., Henry duke of Anjou, was created 
 lieutenant-general. Catherine, who knew the weak and 
 yielding nature of her second son, would gladly have 
 made him the hero of the catholic party in preference to 
 young Guise, whose name she dreaded. 
 
 After much privation, during a march in winter, the 
 huguenots fell in with their German auxiliaries ; and 
 as they now outnumbered their enemies, they marched 
 back into France. They laid siege to Chartres, which, 
 being stoutly defended, kept the army fixed before it, 
 and gave the queen full opportunity for employing her 
 favourite efforts at negotiation. Coligny saw plainly the 
 perfidy of these overtures ; but their followers and sup- 
 porters, anxious for peace, obliged them to listen to terms. 
 A treaty was concluded at Longjumeau, in March, called 
 the Lame Peace, as well from its infirm and uncertain 
 nature, as from the accidental lameness of its two nego- 
 tiators. Its terms were a medium between the edict of 
 Amboise and that of Roussillon. 
 
 The peace was, as Coligny already saw, but a trap to 
 ensnare the huguenot chiefs as soon as their army should 
 be disbanded. They were on their guard, however, keep- 
 ing away from the court, and far apart from each other, 
 that at least one might escape in case of treason. Not- 
 withstanding this resolve, Conde and the admiral found 
 it necessary to consult together, and for this purpose met 
 at Noyers, a little town in Burgundy. The court was 
 soon informed of it; and orders were instantly despatched 
 to Tavannes, and to the other governors in the south, to
 
 1568. HENRY OP NAVARRE. 313 
 
 arrest them. Tavannes was not vigilant in the execution 
 of their commands, and Conde' and Coligny escaped. By 
 this order, the queen had thrown off the mask ; though, 
 indeed, without such an indication, the executions and 
 murders throughout the south sufficiently proved that 
 the lame peace was never intended to be observed by the 
 catholics. Through inconceivable difficulties, the two 
 chiefs traversed the country, and reached Rochelle in 
 safety, where the protestants now found themselves 
 obliged, for the third time, to raise the standard of 
 revolt. Troops did not fail to join them from all quar- 
 ters ; but the most welcome aid came from Beam, the 
 queen of Navarre and her young son arriving at the head 
 of 3000 of their subjects. 
 
 This young prince, destined to run so glorious a career, 
 was born at Pau, in 1553. His father was Anthony of 
 Bourbon, king of Navarre, slain at the siege of Rouen. 
 Chroniclers never forget to relate, that his mother sung 
 at the birth, and that old Henri d'Albret, the infant's 
 grandfather, held up the child in delight, rubbing its 
 lips with garlic, and moistening them with wine. Ex- 
 cepting a short period spent at court, the boy lived the rude 
 and healthy life of a mountaineer, and imbibed from his 
 mother the rigid principles of the reformation. It was 
 in September, 1 568, that he accompanied her to Rochelle. 
 
 As if to add to the horrors of civil war, winter was 
 always chosen as the period of operations. The duke of 
 Anjou was at the head of the catholic army, with the 
 marechal Tavannes for his adviser. When Conde and 
 the huguenots approached, the cold was so extreme as 
 to chill the zeal of both armies. They found it impossible 
 to engage in battle. Mutual pillage, and cruelties too 
 horrid in many instances for the pen to record, were the 
 only feats of the soldiery. During the inaction that en- 
 sued (for the winter grew to that extreme rigour which 
 is seldom known even in France), the numbers of the 
 huguenots' army dispersed : the burgesses and volun- 
 teers, of whom it was principally composed, each betook 
 himself to his own home. The catholic troops, on the
 
 814 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1569- 
 
 contrary, were soldiers by profession, paid and disci- 
 plined. Hence, in the spring, Conde was far inferior in 
 force to his enemies, before whom he was obliged to re- 
 tire towards Rochelle. In his retreat, the prince, having 
 crossed the Charente, took post at Jarnac, determined to 
 keep the river between himself and the enemy, and to 
 dispute his passage. The duke of Anjou, however, suc- 
 ceeded, by rapid marches and feigned attacks, in deceiv- 
 ing the vigilance of the prince ; and, passing the Charente 
 on the morning of the l6'th of March, attacked with 
 26,000 men the huguenots, who did not exceed 1 5,000. 
 At the first intelligence that the duke had passed the 
 river, the retreat was ordered. Conde was already a 
 league distant, with half the army : Coligny was follow- 
 ing, but waited too long for some stray companies of 
 horse. The consequence was, that he was attacked by 
 an overwhelming force of cavalry. The battle here began 
 between the chiefs on either side, who singled each other 
 out. Dandelot seized Monsalez, the leader of the catho- 
 lics, knocked his visor up, and shot him. La Noue, a hu- 
 guenot captain, the celebrated writer of the " Discours," 
 was taken, and, as no quarter was given, escaped with 
 difficulty. Conde, in the mean time, hearing the sounds 
 of an action already engaged, checked the retreat, and, 
 leaving his infantry to follow, galloped with his cavalry 
 to support the admiral. But by this time the whole 
 army of the catholics had come up; and the protestants 
 had no alternative but to die valiantly. The prince of 
 Conde, inspired with this sentiment, was preparing for 
 a charge, when a kick from the horse of one of his of- 
 ficers broke his leg. He stifled the exclamation of pain, 
 charged with his troops, and was overthrown in the 
 struggle. He continued in the midst of the enemy, 
 defending himself, though fallen, until a captain of the 
 duke of Anjou's guard shot him with a pistol. 
 
 The protestants lost the battle and their chief. Their 
 infantry, which Conde had left behind, and which had 
 not fought, now covered the retreat, and served to rally 
 the party. The loss of the prince threatened to prove
 
 1569- CONFLICT AT LA ROCHE-ABEILLE. 315 
 
 more serious than that of the army, the independent 
 captains and nobles refusing to obey Coligny. The cou- 
 rage of Jeanne d'Albret, queen of Navarre, opportunely 
 contributed to the relief of her party. She brought them 
 funds; stimulated them by the example of a woman's 
 intrepidity; and leading her son, prince Henry, accom- 
 panied by his cousin the young prince of Conde, amidst 
 the huguenot chiefs, she exclaimed, " Despair not : be- 
 hold the new chief that Heaven has sent to command 
 you ! " They caught her enthusiasm, and acknowledged 
 Henry of Bourbon as their new leader. 
 
 An army of Germans soon after entered France under 
 the duke of Deux-Ponts. This called the attention of 
 the catholics, and divided their forces. King Charles 
 was already jealtfus of his brother, the duke of Anjou, 
 for the laurels he was gaining, and or the favour shown 
 to him by the queen-mother. The cardinal flattered these 
 feelings of jealousy; and one half of the court was thus 
 employed in counteracting the exertions of the other. 
 The duke of Anjou, in consequence, was unable to fol- 
 low up his victory; nor was the march of the Germans 
 arrested. In a sharp combat that took place at La Roche- 
 Abeille, the huguenots had the advantage. They were 
 exasperated by the knowledge that a body of papal troops 
 had come to swell the royalist army. Their fury and 
 eagerness to welcome the papists made them victo- 
 rious, and at the same time merciless : they gave the 
 Italians no quarter. It was here that young Henry of 
 Navarre was first allowed to mingle in the combat. After 
 this check, the catholics determined on a singular mea- 
 sure, that of throwing strong garrisons into the neigh- 
 bouring towns, and disbanding the rest of the army, with 
 orders to re-assemble in October. It was now but July. 
 Want of funds might have been one of their motives; but 
 the principal reason was, perhaps, to avoid another battle 
 until the German auxiliaries had worn out the resources 
 of the huguenots and their own patience, and had fol- 
 lowed the ordinary custom of such troops, by returning 
 homewards.
 
 31 6 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1569- 
 
 These measures of the court obliged Coligny to under- 
 take a siege, now almost the only mode of carrying on 
 the war. He was averse to it, and would rather have 
 made a bold march toward the capital ; but the noblesse 
 of the province compelled him to lay siege to Poitiers. 
 The young duke of Guise had thrown himself into the 
 town, and the besiegers soon found that he had deter- 
 mined to emulate his father in the celebrated defence of 
 Metz. An epidemic disorder began to ravage the hu- 
 guenot army; and even the life of the admiral, the last 
 resource of his party (Dandelot having been dead some 
 months), was threatened by it. He was at length forced 
 to raise the siege. 
 
 The army of the duke of Anjou re-assembled at the 
 appointed time. It was fresh, healthy, and superior in 
 numbers to that of the huguenots. The purpose of 
 Coligny was to avoid a battle ; but, as had been fore- 
 seen by their enemies, the German troops had by this 
 time grown weary of the service, and, with a view of 
 concluding the war, or of finding a pretext to desert it, 
 they demanded to be led to battle. The catholics 
 were pressing upon them, and there had been a sharp 
 skirmish on the preceding night. In obedience to the 
 will of his army, Coligny turned and faced the enemy 
 in the plains of Montcontour. An action took place ; a 
 confused and headlong fight, in which all the duties of 
 a general, save that of valour, were set aside and for- 
 gotten. There was a single combat between Coligny and 
 a German leader called the Rheingraf. He shot away part 
 of the jaw of the admiral, who slew his adversary. Such 
 was the exasperation, that the servants and suttlers of 
 the huguenot camp mingled in the ranks, or rather in 
 the press, and fought. The catholics were too strong 
 and too disciplined for their enemies. They defeated 
 them, drove them from the field, and, remembering 
 Roche-Abeille, slaughtered without offering quarter. 
 
 This was the fourth battle lost by the protestants. It 
 shook their constancy and courage ; and at St. Jean 
 d'Angeli, where the wreck of the army rallied, thoughts
 
 1569- THE DUKE OP ANJOU DISPLACED. 317 
 
 were universally entertained of at length submitting to 
 the authority of the king, and to the yoke of the catho- 
 lics. The indomitable spirit of Coligny, however, roused 
 his party. Wounded as he was, he could still enumerate 
 the resources that remained : the cavalry, that had 
 escaped with little loss from Montcontour ; the army 
 with which Montgomeri had just reduced Beam ; and 
 also the aid of foreign powers ; above all, of England, 
 with whose support Rochelle, the principal strong-hold 
 of the huguenots, was impregnable. The eloquence of 
 Coligny was convincing ; his fortitude shamed away all 
 thoughts of submission ; and, retreating farther into the 
 south, the protestants showed themselves as formidable 
 in defeat as in victory. 
 
 The royalists did not pursue their advantage with 
 vigour. The new success of the duke of Anjou rekin- 
 dled the jealousy of Charles. The monarch joined the 
 army, set aside the duke of Anjou from the command, 
 and sent his partisan Tavannes to the insignificant 
 government of Boulogne. Instead of pursuing the ad- 
 miral, the catholics weakened themselves through the very 
 fault which he had committed in the preceding summer, 
 by engaging their force in sieges. They invested St. 
 Jean d'Angeli. The petty fortress held out for the 
 space of two months ; and, instead of being able to re- 
 duce llochelle, la Noue, the huguenot governor of that 
 town, was able to make conquests and gain partial vic- 
 tories. La Noue, on one of these occasions, sustained 
 the loss of one arm, which obliged him to use an iron 
 hook for holding his bridle, and he thence acquired the 
 name of Bras de Fer. 
 
 From the small results of this year's campaign, in 
 which he had gained two decisive victories without in 
 any sensible degree checking the progress of the re- 
 formation, Charles began to perceive that war was inef- 
 fectual, and that it was a vain hope to reduce the religious 
 malcontents by force. To pardon, or grant them tole- 
 rance, was foreign to his envious and malicious temper, 
 as well as repugnant to his bigot principles. The only
 
 318 HISTOKY OF FRANCE. 15?0. 
 
 means left were to recur to the favourite policy of the 
 queen-mother, that of negotiating with the huguenots, 
 concluding a treaty, affecting reconciliation, and artfully 
 getting possession of the persons of all the chiefs. Da- 
 vila says that Catherine impressed this advice upon her 
 son at this juncture, on perceiving that the Montmorency 
 family were wavering, and already meditating a desertion 
 of the party of the court for that of the admiral. Most 
 historians assign to Charles another counsellor in these 
 matters : this was an Italian, Alberto Gcndi, count de 
 Retz, whom the queen had placed about the person of 
 the young monarch, and who failed not to instil into 
 him those Machiavelian principles, that were considered 
 in his country as including the only honourable maxims, 
 the only rules of action worthy of the statesman. In 
 this he most probably went beyond the wishes of Ca- 
 therine ; for Gondi cordially joined the king in his jea- 
 lousies and suspicions against his mother. 
 
 Events soon occurred to render the crooked policy 
 meditated by Charles more necessary. Cosse-Brissac, 
 commanding the catholics, was beaten by Coligny, 
 who, avoiding the fatal measure of a siege, advanced 
 upon the capital. The veteran admiral was by this time 
 weary of the war j he was sick of shedding the blood of 
 his fellow-countrymen ; his avowed object was peace a 
 treaty in which the rights of the French protestants 
 should be guarantied, and which, allowing them to join 
 their arms to those of their catholic brethren, might open 
 an opportunity for gaining victories over a foreign ene- 
 my, instead of those which now, whatever side claimed 
 or won them, were equally disastrous to France. An 
 envoy from the court found Coligny disposed to enter- 
 tain these sentiments. The terms he had to offer were 
 favourable in the highest degree. However the sus- 
 picions of the admiral might be awakened by this facility 
 of concession, he had no pretext for showing them. If 
 Catherine of Medicis had recurred to her former plan of 
 entrapping the chiefs of the huguenots, who now re- 
 mained of them but he ? It was selfishness, then, and
 
 1570. TREATV WITH THE HUGUENOTS. 319 
 
 personal timidity, in Coligny to object on this account. 
 The treaty was, in consequence, concluded. Amnesty 
 and liberty of conscience were granted to the protestants : 
 their worship was allowed in all towns held by them 
 during the war, and, at any rate, in two towns of each 
 province ; and they were allowed to preserve and gar- 
 rison four strong places in the kingdom, viz. Rochelle, 
 Montauban, Cognac, and La Charite, as guaranties that 
 these conditions would be observed. Such was the 
 treaty signed in August, 1570. It is impossible to sup- 
 pose that Charles could have granted, as his mother 
 advised, such terms, especially the last of them, without 
 some secret determinations of vengeance. After the vic- 
 tories of the preceding year,- the late defeat of Brissac, 
 which had led to negotiations, might have been itself an 
 artifice, such concessions would be utterly inconsistent 
 with the known sagacity of those who made them, un- 
 less we suppose that their intention was to cover the 
 perfidious designs that were approaching their maturity. 
 Anquetil asserts that the admiral manifested entire 
 confidence ; and adds, that he, immediately after the 
 peace, retired with the queen and the prince of Navarre 
 to Rochelle. He could not have given a stronger proof 
 of mistrust. 
 
 The object of the court was not peace, but vengeance, 
 To draw the protestant leaders to the capital became 
 the principal effort of policy. To entice the queen of 
 Navarre an ample pretext was found. It was proposed 
 that her son Henry should espouse Margaret, the king's 
 sister, which marriage would in itself be a bond of union 
 between the parties. To Coligny Charles held out what 
 he knew to be the darling project of the admiral, a war 
 against Spain, undertaken by the French of both re- 
 ligions, for the purpose of annexing the ancient fief of 
 Flanders to the crown. The queen of Navarre was 
 mistrustful : she abhorred taking a wife for her son from 
 amidst so corrupt a court. Still she hesitated to refuse 
 so high an offer : she came to negotiate. Catherine of 
 Medicis lavished all her smiles, made use of all her
 
 320 HISTORY OF FRANCK. 1570. 
 
 cajoleries, in vain. Her power of address and artifice 
 failed before the stern and conscientious doubts of 
 Jeanne of Navarre. This princess died after a short 
 illness, and the objections raised by her ceased to be 
 urged. The protestant writers do not doubt that she 
 was poisoned ; no proof, however, corroborates the sus- 
 picion. 
 
 Coligny in the past troublesome times had appeared 
 as the valiant though often unsuccessful soldier, full 
 of resources, and never more formidable than when 
 overwhelmed by defeat or surprise. Still we might 
 have mistaken him for a zealot, for one of those fiery 
 spirits born but to breathe the atmosphere of civil 
 strife, had not his later days shown him the patriot, 
 sacrificing self-interest to the public weal, forgetting 
 his just suspicions in his love of peace, and only medi- 
 tating how the disgrace of intestine war might be ob- 
 literated by the glory of foreign conquests. There is 
 even an admixture of romance in his life. A noble lady 
 of Savoy became enamoured of his heroism, and escaped 
 to espouse him. By this she lost her rich possessions, 
 which were confiscated. Neither she nor Coligny showed 
 regret at the loss. He gave his daughter at the same 
 time to Teligny, a gallant young soldier, who had fought 
 under his own eyes, but who possessed neither birth 
 nor fortune. Full of his schemes of wresting Flanders 
 from Philip II., Coligny appeared at court, and was 
 received by Charles as a son might receive a forgiving 
 parent : " My father," said the perfidious young mo- 
 narch, in a tone that did not betray the real irony of 
 the expression, " we hold you now, and you shall not 
 escape us." 
 
 Coligny was in fact treated as the father of the court : 
 the king consulted him on every occasion, while young 
 Guise, his uncle of Lorraine, and their party, concealed 
 their disgrace, and affected the deepest resentment against 
 Charles. So perfect was the dissimulation, and so pro- 
 foundly played was the game, that the catholic historians, 
 who wish to excuse or palliate the atrocity of Charles,
 
 1570. COLIGNY MURDERED. 321 
 
 have room to pretend that he was really won over 
 by the noble bearing and the patriotic views of Coligny; 
 and that the Guises and Catherine, afraid of the admi- 
 ral's influence, forced the young monarch into the 
 conspiracy against him. There is an -absurdity in the 
 supposition, whether it be regarded generally, or examined 
 in detail. There could be no object in enticing Coligny 
 to court except that act of vengeance through which his 
 enemies hoped " by one fell swoop" to get rid of him 
 and his principal adherents. The Spanish war, which 
 served as a pretext, could never have been sincerely me- 
 ditated, and was evidently a rumour, intended to last 
 for a short time, until the catastrophe should occur by 
 which it was to be dissipated. 
 
 The pope, however, was really deceived by the ami- 
 cable bearing of Charles towards the huguenots, by the 
 inexplicable lenity of the treaty, and above all, by the 
 marriage. The legate expostulated with the French 
 king, who was embarrassed how to frame a reply, not 
 daring to betray his intentions. " I wish to Heaven, car- 
 dinal, that I could tell you all," were the words of Charles ; 
 " but you and the pope shall soon know how beneficial 
 this marriage shall prove to the interests of religion. 
 Take my word for it, in a little time the holy father 
 shall have reason to praise my designs, my piety, and 
 my zeal in behalf of the faith." 
 
 The ill-omened marriage at length took place. Co- 
 ligny went not without warnings : he pretended to have 
 good reasons for his confidence, and accused the mis- 
 trustful of folly. " I would rather save myself with 
 the fools," said Langoiran, " than die with such sage 
 people." The admiral remained, and was present at 
 the wedding of the prince of Navarre with the princess 
 Margaret on the 17th of August. Festivities of the 
 utmost splendour followed the ceremony. Catherine of 
 Medicis showed her taste and ingenuity in them at the 
 very time that a murder was planning. On the 21st, as 
 the admiral was proceeding home on foot from the 
 Louvre, an arquebuss, discharged at him from a window, 
 
 VOL. i. Y
 
 S22 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 15?2. 
 
 wounded him dangerously in two places. He was never- 
 theless able to reach his residence. It was evident who 
 was the immediate instigator of the murder. The as- 
 sassin was known to be Maurevel, one who had been 
 before employed to shoot Mouy, a huguenot general. 
 The shot was fired from the house of one attached to 
 the duke of Guise. 
 
 When the king was informed of the event, he ex- 
 claimed, " Shall I never be left in repose ? " He paid 
 no attention to the duke of Guise, with whom he was 
 at the moment playing, and who had no doubt by his 
 orders planned the mode of putting to death the admi- 
 ral. Charles had hoped that the murder of Coligny 
 would have roused the huguenots to take instant ven- 
 geance upon Guise, and that in the tumult his troops, 
 aided by the Parisians, would soon master them in the 
 moment of insurrection, to which he could easily affix 
 the appearance of treason. Thus the king would be rid 
 of the importunate chiefs of both parties. But the ad- 
 miral wounded and not killed was the worst that could 
 happen. His indignant followers might retire with him, 
 and recommence the civil war. This was to be pre- 
 vented at all hazards. Charles undertook to soothe Co- 
 ligny : he visited him, expressed the utmost resentment 
 at the murderous attempt, and vowed to take vengeance 
 on the perpetrators when he should discover them. " To 
 discover them cannot be difficult," replied the admiral, 
 coolly. 
 
 Whatever had been the plans of the king and of Ca- 
 therine, it was evident that something had gone wrong 
 in them. Their aim had been to get rid of their ene- 
 mies, yet escape the odium. It now became necessary 
 to brave the odium, and execute the essential part of the 
 project, if they would not run the risk of frustrating the 
 object of all their negotiations, concessions, and treachery. 
 In a consultation, therefore, held by Charles with his 
 brother the duke of Anjou, the Guises, and Catherine, a 
 general massacre of the huguenots was decided on. The 
 queen-mother was for slaying merely the seven or eight
 
 1572. THE EVE OP ST. BARTHOLOMEW. 323 
 
 leading chiefs j but Charles, who had hitherto hesitated, 
 at once became furious with the foretaste of blood, and 
 ordered an indiscriminate slaughter. This was but too 
 congenial with the sanguinary spirit of the Guises, who 
 undertook the execution. Tavannes was charged to 
 muster the city guards on the appointed night, and in- 
 struct them in the task and the order of slaughter. 
 
 The eve of St. Bartholomew, the 24th of August, 
 was the night appointed. The prince of Navarre and 
 the prince of Conde were the only protestants to be 
 spared : yet Charles, on observing the young count de 
 la Rochefoucault, whom he liked, about to leave the 
 Louvre, laid his hand upon him, and besought him to 
 stay that night at the palace. The count refused : 
 the king entreated ; but fearing to awaken suspicion, he 
 abandoned his friend to his fate. All was wakeful that 
 night in the Louvre. The orders were issued ; and 
 Charles, restless and agitated, watched the hours in hor- 
 rible suspense. The queen-mother and the duke of 
 Anjou were with him. The latter has left a record of 
 the moment, and describes the stunning effect of the 
 first pistol shot that broke the stillness of the night. 
 Guise and his band of cut-throats rushed out at the 
 sound towards their appointed prey, whilst the tocsin of 
 St. Germain 1'Auxerrois called the catholic citizens to 
 the massacre of their brethren. 
 
 Guise soon reached the admiral's abode, and forced 
 his way in, crying, " To death ! to death !" but feared 
 himself to face Coligny. It was Berne, a German fol- 
 lower of the duke's, who rushed up stairs, and entering 
 an apartment, beheld a venerable man engaged in prayer. 
 " Is't thou who art Coligny ? " asked the assassin. " It 
 is I," replied the admiral : " young man respect my grey 
 hairs." Berne, for answer, plunged his sword into the 
 admiral's body, and exclaimed through the window, ' ' He 
 is done for." " Let us see, though," cried the sanguin- 
 ary Guise ; and the bleeding corpse of Coligny was flung 
 down to him : he wiped the face with his handkerchief, 
 in order to recognise the features, and then was satisfied. 
 y 2
 
 HISTORY OF FKAXCB. 1572. 
 
 The same scene was repeated in every street, almost 
 in every house. The catholics, with the sign of the 
 cross in their caps, or the image of the Virgin round 
 their necks, to distinguish them, pursued all those that 
 bore not these symbols of the assassin, and murdered 
 them without pity. Yeomen were not spared, nor youth ; 
 and the child that could wield a mallet, it is recorded, 
 was directed to dash out the brains of the infants of 
 heretics. What is surprising, the victims made no 
 resistance ! The most valiant captains bared their throats 
 to the knife ; they would not derogate, at such a mo- 
 ment, from their character of martyrs. Most were 
 murdered as they slept, or when just starting from their 
 beds. Teligny, to whom the admiral had given his 
 daughter, was shot on the tiles of his house. One old 
 noble, Caumont de la Force, who had himself received 
 his death- wound, saw one of his sons slain : ere his 
 strength left him, he had presence of mind to fling him- 
 self upon his other son, still sleeping, and thus concealed 
 and preserved him with a parent's dead body. A hu- 
 guenot, pursued by a captain of the king's guard, in the 
 very palace, rushed towards the chamber of the king of 
 Navarre, forced it open, and flung himself into the bed 
 for safety. Charles's sister, Margaret, the bride of the 
 late spousals, was in it alone. She sprung up in affright, 
 the huguenot still clinging to her for safety. The cap- 
 tain arrived with his drawn sword, but was so struck 
 with the ludicrous position of the princess and the terri- 
 fied huguenot, that he burst into laughter, and was 
 induced to spare his victim. 
 
 No allowable space would suffice for the records of 
 such indiscriminate massacre. Charles, by his missives, 
 ordered the same scene to be renewed in every town 
 throughout his dominions. And the principal cities 
 but too zealously responded. Fifty thousand protestants 
 re said to have fallen victims of the monarch's order. 
 A few commanders refused. The viscount d'Orthe wrote 
 back to the court, " that he commanded soldiers, not 
 assassins." And even the public executioner of a cer-
 
 1572. MASSACRE OP THE PROTESTANTS. 325 
 
 tain town,, when a dagger was put into his hands, flung 
 it away, and declared himself above the crime. The 
 family of the Montmorency, though catholics, showed 
 their abhorrence of these acts, and had the courage to 
 take down the body of the admiral, which had been hung 
 to the common gibbet, and to give it burial at Chantilly. 
 Charles IX. had not failed to visit it, while yet sus- 
 pended. His followers complained of the odour. " The 
 body of a dead enemy cannot smell otherwise than 
 sweet," was his reply. And yet this is the monarch 
 whom some historians uphold to have been sincere in 
 his demonstrations of friendship to Coligny ; and who, 
 say they, was but subsequently induced, by an intrigue- 
 of Catherine and of Guise, to consent to the massacre. 
 He now avowed that all was committed by his orders ; 
 and even held a bed of justice in his parliament for the 
 very purpose. The trembling judges, with de Thou, 
 their president, could not but applaud his zeal. As for 
 de 1'Hopital, who had long been banished from court, 
 and who had abandoned the friendship of Catherine since 
 she had joined the Guises, he expected not to be spared, 
 and ordered his domestics to throw open the gates. They 
 disobeyed, aud the murderers were unable to reach him. 
 But de I'Hopital did not long survive to deplore the 
 miseries of his country. His words were, " After such 
 horrors, I do not wish to live." The joy of the pope, on 
 the other hand, and of Philip of Spain, knew no bounds. 
 The supreme pontiff went in state to his cathedral, and 
 returned public thanks to Heaven for this signal mercy. 
 Charles had spared his sister's husband, the young 
 king of Navarre, and his companion the prince of 
 Conde. It was only at the price of being converted. 
 Death or the mass was the alternative offered to them ; 
 and both, after some resistance, yielded in appearance. 
 On the other hand, mere abhorrence of the massacre 
 caused many catholic gentlemen to turn huguenots. 
 Amongst these was Henry de la Tour d'Auvergne, vis- 
 count de Turenne. After all, the crime, from which so 
 much was expected, produced neither peace nor advan- 
 y 3
 
 1 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1573. 
 
 tage. The huguenots were, indeed, paralysed by the 
 blow ; but the catholics were no less stupified by remorse 
 and shame. King Charles himself seemed stricken al- 
 ready by avenging fate. He was nervous, and agitated. 
 The blood he had spilled seemed ever to stream before 
 his eyes. A continual fever took possession of him, and 
 henceforth never ceased to consume him. The chiefs 
 were equally languid, equally disunited. The huguenots 
 had time to rally, and to prepare for defence. Rochelle 
 and Montauban shut their gates. Charles in hisblindness 
 sent la Noue, the huguenot, to Rochelle; he became its 
 commander. The town was at length besieged, and 
 thousands of the catholics fell before it ; among them, 
 not a few of the murderers who assisted in the massacre 
 on St. Bartholomew's eve. At length Charles, unable 
 to conquer, and incompetent to carry on war with vigour, 
 granted the huguenots a peace. Rochelle and JMontau- 
 ban preserved the freedom of their religion ; and Charles 
 had the pain of perceiving that his grand and sweeping 
 crime had but enfeebled the catholic party, instead of 
 ensuring its triumph. 
 
 Catherine, in the mean time, had the address to pro- 
 cure the crown of Poland for the son of her predilection, 
 Henry duke of Anjou. She had lavished her wealth 
 upon the electors for this purpose. No sooner was the 
 point gained than she regretted it. The health of 
 Charles was now manifestly on the decline, and Cathe- 
 rine would fain have retained Henry ; but the jealousy 
 of the king forbade. After conducting the duke on his 
 way to Poland the court returned to St. Germain, and 
 Charles sunk, without hope or consolation, on his couch 
 of sickness. Even here he was not allowed to repose. 
 The young king of Navarre formed a project of escape 
 with the prince of Conde'. The due d'Alencon, youngest 
 brother of the king, joined in it. A body of horse were 
 to wait in the forest of St. Germain for the princes, and 
 protect them in their flight. The vigilance of the queen- 
 mother discovered the enterprise, which, for her own 
 purposes, she magnified into a serious plot. Charles
 
 1574. DEATH OF CHARLES XX. 327 
 
 was informed that a huguenot army was coming to 
 surprise him, and he was obliged to be removed into a 
 litter, in order to escape. " This is too much," said he : 
 " could they not have let me die in peace." 
 
 Conde was the only prince that succeeded in making 
 his escape. The king of Navarre and the due d'Alen- 
 con were imprisoned. The former, accused of conspir- 
 ing against the king's life, defended himself with mag- 
 nanimity, and asked, was it a crime, if he, a king, 
 sought to free himself from durance? This young 
 prince, or monarch, had already succeeded by his ad- 
 dress, his frankness, and high character, in rallying to 
 his interests the most honourable of the noblesse, who 
 dreaded at once the perfidious Catherine and her chil- 
 dren ; who had renounced their good opinion of young 
 Guise after the day of St. Bartholomew; and who, at the 
 same time professing Catholicism, were averse to hugue- 
 not principles and zeal. This party, called the Pott- 
 tif/nes, professed to follow the middle or neutral course, 
 which at one time had been that of Catherine of Medicis ; 
 but she had long since deserted it, and had joined in all 
 the sanguinary and extreme measures of her son and of 
 the Guises. Hence she was especially odious to the new 
 and moderate party of the Politiques, among whom the 
 family of Montmorency held the lead. C atherine feared 
 their interference at the moment of the king's death, 
 whilst his successor was absent in a remote kingdom; 
 and she swelled the project of the princes' escape into a 
 serious conspiracy, in order to be mistress of those whom 
 she feared. Lamole and Coconas, both confidants of the 
 princes, were executed for favouring their escape. The 
 marshals of Cosse and Montmorency were sent to the 
 Bastile. In this state of the court Charles IX. expired 
 on the 30th of May, 1574, after having nominated the 
 queen-mother to be regent during his successor's ab- 
 sence. 
 
 The character of Charles is graven in the events of 
 his reign. He was a cruel and perfidious monsters 
 and although a great portion of the burden of his crime;
 
 328 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1574. 
 
 must fall on the religion which prompted and absolved, 
 nay, nominally hallowed them, yet to have been instru- 
 mental in perpetrating such atrocities is sufficient to 
 damn him. One should think there was no need for 
 this severity of language ; one might suppose that the 
 mere facts, the massacres of the time, would sufficiently 
 provoke the judgment of every reader. But the memory 
 of Charles IX. has never wanted defenders. Brantome 
 describes him as a pattern of amiability and virtue. 
 Catholic writers have not ceased to vaunt and to excuse 
 him ; and even a modern historian, Anquetil, begs us 
 tc to excuse his extreme vivacity," and informs us that 
 " his good qualities were far more in number than his 
 bad ones." 
 
 CHAP. IX. 
 
 15741589- 
 
 HENRY THE THIRD. 
 
 THE career of the new king, while duke of Anjou, had 
 been glorious. Raised to the command of armies at the 
 age of fifteen, he displayed extreme courage as well as 
 generalship. He had defeated the veteran leader of the 
 protestants at Jarnac and at Montcontour ; and the 
 fame of his exploits had contributed to place him 
 on the elective throne of Poland, which he now occu- 
 pied. Auguring from his past life, a brilliant epoch 
 might be anticipated ; and yet we enter upon the most 
 contemptible reign, perhaps, in the annals of France. 
 Notwithstanding the valour of Henry, occasionally di- 
 rected by a mind sagacious enough when awakened, 
 there was a weakness, a fatuity about him, that looked 
 like a curse, for it was unaccountable. He seemed to 
 have faculties, but no spirit to direct them. Pleasure
 
 FIFTH CITIL WAR. 329 
 
 was with him the sole end of existence. He inherited 
 from his mother a complete indifference to any principle 
 or party. But this want, of motive, which she amply 
 supplied by profound and active selfishness, in him be- 
 came apathy, combined with a distaste for aught saVe 
 sensual and frivolous enjoyment. The maternal feeling 
 that led the astute Catherine to centre her affection in 
 this weak and infatuated son must have wrought for 
 her much of the pain and mortification that her perfidy 
 deserved. 
 
 Henry was obliged to run away by stealth from his 
 Polish subjects. When overtaken by one of the nobles 
 of that kingdom, the monarch, instead of pleading his 
 natural anxiety to visit France and secure his inherit- 
 ance, excused himself by drawing forth the portrait of 
 his mistress, the princess of Conde, and declared that it 
 was love which hastened his return. At Vienna, how- 
 ever, Heriry forgot both crown and mistress amidst the 
 feasts that were given him ; and he turned aside to 
 Venice, to enjoy a similar reception from that rich re- 
 public. In these pleasures he lingered, lavishing money, 
 and even giving away the fortresses of his kingdom in 
 liberality to his -hosts. 
 
 The hostile parties were in them ean time arming 
 The Politiques, or neutral catholics, for the first time, 
 showed themselves in the field. They demanded the 
 freedom of Cosse and of Montmorency, and at length 
 formed a treaty of alliance with the huguenots. Henry, 
 after indulging in the ceremony of being crowned, was 
 obliged to lead an army into the field. Sieges were un- 
 dertaken on both sides, and what is called the fifth civil 
 war raged openly. It became more serious when the 
 king's brother joined it. This was the duke of Alencon, 
 a vain and fickle personage, of whom it pleased the 
 king to become jealous. Alencon fled, and joined the 
 malcontents. The reformers, however, warred but lan- 
 guidly. Both parties were without active and zealous 
 leaders; and the only notable event of this war was a 
 skirmish in Champagne, where the duke of Guise re-
 
 330 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 ceivecl a slight wound in the cheek. From hence came 
 his surname of Le Balafre. 
 
 Since the massacre of St. Bartholomew's eve, at least 
 since his frustrated attempt to escape, the young king 
 of Navarre had remained a captive at court, under the 
 watchful and envious eye of Catherine. Forgetful of 
 his high destinies, Bourbon gave himself up to pleasure : 
 some of his admirers assert that he affected to be dead 
 to ambition, in order to lull the suspicions of the queen- 
 mother, thus acting the part of Brutus at the court of 
 Tarquin. His desire to escape could not have slept. 
 To support the presence of his wife must alone have 
 been bitter humiliation to him : Margaret was at once 
 as debauched and as cruel as her royal brothers ; and 
 about this very time Duguast, one of the king's infamous 
 favourites, fell under the dagger of a person hired by 
 her to avenge an insult. Still Bourbon endured all 
 with his characteristic gaiety. " I must abandon the 
 mass and my wife," said he, " but, with the help of 
 friends, I hope to be able to do without either." When 
 the duke of Alencon escaped, he pressed the king of 
 Navarre to accompany him ; but the latter would not 
 trust himself again to one who had before betrayed him; 
 and it was not until some time after the duke's flight, 
 that Bourbon succeeded in leaving the court. He bent 
 his course towards Guienne, and at Niort publicly 
 avowed his adherence to the reformed religion, declaring 
 that force alone had made him conform to the mass. 
 
 It was about this time that the king, in lieu of leading 
 an army against the malcontents, despatched the queen- 
 mother, with her gay and licentious court, to win back 
 his brother. She succeeded, though not without making 
 large concessions. The duke of Alencon obtained Anjou, 
 and other provinces in appanage, and henceforth was 
 styled duke of Anjou. More favourable terms were 
 granted to the huguenots : they were allowed ten towns 
 of surety in lieu of six, and the appointment of a certain 
 number of judges in the parliament. 
 
 Such weakness in Henry disgusted the body of the
 
 1576. DEPRAVITY OP HENRY III. 331 
 
 catholics ; and the private habits of his life contributed 
 still more, if possible, than his public measures, to ren- 
 der him contemptible. He was continually surrounded 
 by a set of young and idle favourites, whose affectation 
 it was to unite ferocity with frivolity. The king showed 
 them such tender affection as he might evince towards 
 woman : they even had the unblushing impudence to 
 adopt feminine habits of dress; and the monarch passed 
 his time in adorning them and himself with robes and 
 ear-rings. The licentiousness of the court, and the 
 demoralisation arising from the total absence of female 
 virtue, Avhich, since the reign of Francis I., had been 
 notorious, were carried to such extent under Charles IX., 
 that the higher ranks of the sex ceased to have charms, 
 and became objects of disgust, even to the licentious. 
 Hence came the indescribable tastes and amusements of 
 Henry and his mignons, as his favourites were called, 
 which raised up throughout the nation one universal cry 
 of abhorrence and contempt. 
 
 The populace of Paris had from the first declared 
 against the huguenots : the blood they had spilled on 
 St. Bartholomew's eve was enough to fix them in their 
 opinions. They cordially sympathised with the catholic 
 chiefs, and with young Guise, who lived in a kind of 
 exile in his government of Champagne, resentful on 
 account of the lenity and concessions of the king in the 
 late treaty. Their religion was menaced, and an asso- 
 ciation was formed to support it, which afterwards grew 
 into the famous league. The idea might have been 
 taken from the protestants, who at this time formed a 
 closely united body. But many trace the origin of the 
 league to a date some years anterior, and attribute it to 
 the cardinal of Lorraine and his brother, the first duke 
 of Guise. In my own view, if the league had any 
 model, it was the institution of the Jesuits, of which, 
 about this period, it adopted the leading principle, viz. 
 the necessity of an absolute chief. The first document 
 of the union that was signed in Picardy lays stress on 
 this as the chief point. It is curious to mark the dif-
 
 332 HISTOUY OF FRANCE. 1576. 
 
 ferent tendencies of the two religions. Rochelle at the 
 same time refused to receive the prince of Conde as 
 king of Navarre, otherwise than with only a few fol- 
 lowers, stipulating that their leader should have no more 
 authority over them than the judges in Israel. The 
 catholics, however, at once looked to Guise as their 
 chief. And when Henry, by his conduct, rendered 
 himself utterly contemptible, when his brother showed 
 a character equally null, and when, in fact, the race of 
 Valois seemed likely soon to become extinct, the catholics 
 began to look to the duke of Guise, not merely as a 
 party leader, but as their future monarch. The Bour- 
 bons, the natural heirs to the crown, were set aside as 
 heretics. The genealogy of the Guises was blazoned 
 forth, as showing their descent from Charlemagne. It 
 was argued that they were the true inheritors of the 
 crown, the race of Capet being declared usurpers from 
 the commencement. Such were the general reasonings 
 of the leaguers. Their immediate plan was to force the 
 king to summon the states-general, to employ their 
 utmost efforts to secure the election of catholic members, 
 and, by means of this majority, to revoke the privileges 
 granted to the huguenots. Some also proposed to shut 
 up the king and his brother in a convent, and offer the 
 crown to the duke of Guise. The raore experienced 
 members of the party were, however, well aware that 
 the time was not yet arrived for such extreme measures. 
 The states-general met at Blois in December, 1576. 
 The huguenots themselves were eager for their meeting, 
 from a recollection of the sentiments favourable to mo- 
 deration and to tolerance, evinced by the last states, 
 summoned at Orleans. They forgot the influence exer- 
 cised at that period by the chancellor de 1'Hopital, as 
 well as by Coligny. Now the league had spread its 
 ramifications throughout the kingdom : the provincial 
 assemblies and elections were completely influenced by 
 them. The states were in the interest of Guise, as ap- 
 peared from the nature of their first demands : these 
 were the repeal of the edicts, and a declaration of war
 
 1577- EDICT OP POITIERS. 333 
 
 against the heretics. They sought to obtain the force 
 of law for their decrees, and conducted themselves in 
 every way as an artful and factious assembly. Henry 
 was roused from his apathy by these intrigues, and 
 showed at once the sagacity of his mother. Instead of 
 combating the league, he drew it forth from its secrecy, 
 subscribed to it, and declared himself its chief. This 
 was the most adroit blow that he could give to the 
 ambition of Guise, who had no longer an excuse for 
 being disloyal. To the demand of the states for war 
 Henry acceded : he declared himself eager to begin it, 
 and begged funds for that purpose. This request cooled 
 the ardour of the states ; and the commons avowed, that 
 since war must be supported by taxes, they were not so 
 averse to peace. The king thus countermined all the 
 intrigues of the Guises. He was enabled to dismiss the 
 states, and to grant, by the edict of Poitiers, such con- 
 cessions as satisfied the huguenots, without being so 
 disgraceful to the crown as the preceding treaty. 
 
 After this momentary exertion of prudence and acti- 
 vity Henry relapsed into his frivolous habits, and again 
 sought the society of his minions. Jealousy still existed 
 between the king and his brother ; and the favourites 
 increased it. One day when the king, accompanied by 
 his young companions, all " desperately frizzed and 
 starched, covered with gold and diamonds," was attend- 
 ing a ceremony, Bussy d'Amboise, a follower of the 
 duke of Anjou, made his appearance, simply clad, but 
 attended by six pages, frizzed and starched also, and 
 clothed in cloth of gold, after the fashion of the mignons. 
 The king was wroth at the insult ; but the favourites 
 vowed vengeance. After some combats and quarrels, 
 the duke of Anjou and Bussy quitted the court together. 
 The mignons did not want courage : three of them en- 
 gaged soon after in a duel with three partisans of the 
 duke of Guise. They were all slain after having killed 
 two of their antagonists. The king was inconsolable, 
 wept over their bodies, cut off their locks, and erected 
 magnificent tombs for them. Another favourite, St.
 
 SS4 HISTOBY OF FRANCE. 1580. 
 
 Megrin, was a lover of the duchess of Guise. He was 
 assassinated ; and his fate was a new source of grief for 
 Henry, who consoled himself by causing Bussy d'Amboise 
 to be despatched in the same way. 
 
 The king of Navarre, in the mean time, who resided 
 at Nerac, was strengthening his party. The greatest 
 disorder reigned in Languedoc, the governors yielding 
 obedience to neither of the kings, and threatening, upon 
 the slightest pretext, to join one party and oppose the 
 other. Nevertheless, peace subsisted, and there seemed 
 really to exist no matter for negotiation. Catherine, 
 however, could not rest in the idle court of her son. 
 Under the pretext of conducting her daughter Margaret 
 to her husband, the king of Navarre, she took a jour- 
 ney to Nerac, and proposed to bring Bourbon into a 
 more amicable understanding. The consequence of her 
 attempts was the breaking out of a new war, called the 
 war des Amoureux or of the Lovers, it being excited by 
 Margaret in revenge for the king's betraying to her hus- 
 band her intrigues with the viscount de Turenne and the 
 duke of Anjou. This war, which was confined to the 
 capture of a few towns, and which served but to exer- 
 cise and make known the valour and generosity-of the 
 king of Navarre, occupied the year 1580, and terminated 
 in a peace little different fromlthat which concluded the 
 former war. 
 
 The league had slumbered since its first defeat at Blois. 
 It was now to be roused into activity by the king of 
 Spain. The duke of Anjou, that fickle and restless 
 prince, not content with pretending to the hand of the 
 queen of England, also grasped at the offer made by the 
 revolted Flemings to proclaim him count and inde- 
 pendent sovereign of Flanders. The French reformers 
 crowded under his banners, and he marched northwards 
 at the head of 12,000 men. He seized Cambray, ac- 
 quired the dominion of the Low Countries, and might 
 have reigned there in despite of the Spaniards, had it 
 been possible for a son of Catherine to follow the rules 
 of common honesty or prudence. But having conceived
 
 1 585. TREATY OF THE LEAGUEBS WITH PHILIP II. 335 
 
 a jealousy of the prince of Orange and of his new sub- 
 jects, the duke attempted to make himself master of 
 Antwerp. A massacre of the citizens took place by his 
 orders ; and the general indignation expelled him from 
 the Low Countries. The duke of Anjou soon after died, 
 in disappointment and shame. 
 
 This enterprise of a French prince, aided by French 
 protestants, and not opposed by Henry/ made a deep 
 impression upon Philip II. : he vowed to give, thence- 
 forward, occupation to the French at home. He first 
 endeavoured to make use of the reformers themselves, 
 and to induce the king of Navarre to attack Henry. On 
 the other hand, but with more sincerity, he resuscitated 
 the league by aid and by promises. Philip hoped thus 
 to occupy and consume both parties in mutual war ; but 
 Bourbon resisted and rejected all his treacherous offers. 
 Guise was less scrupulous. Towards the end of the 
 year 1584 that duke retired from court, followed by 
 all his adherents and the zealots of the league. Henry, 
 unconscious of danger, though not blind to their inten- 
 tions, pursued them with jests, not arms. Nancy, the 
 capital of Lorraine, was their rendezvous ; and here a 
 solemn- treaty was concluded in February, 1585, be- 
 tween the French leaguers and Philip of Spain. By 
 this it was stipulated, that in case of Henry III.'s death, 
 the cardinal of Bourbon, the only catholic of that family, 
 should be called to the throne, to the exclusion of the 
 king of Navarre ; that he should renew the peace of 
 Chateau-Cambresis, restore all subsequent conquests, 
 and assist in the subjugation of the Low Countries. In 
 return, Philip agreed to furnish an army, and to pay 
 50,000 crowns a month by way of subsidy. 
 
 The league had but to declare itself in order to be 
 victorious. The towns of the north fell at once into 
 the hands of its partisans. Burgundy was equally fa- 
 vourable to them. The south-west alone held for the 
 reformers, yet rallied but feebly to the king of Navarre. 
 The huguenot towns were in fact inimical to royalty, 
 and longed to imitate Geneva in the establishment of a
 
 336 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1585. 
 
 republic. This was one great cause of the superior 
 forces with which the leaguers now overwhelmed their 
 enemies. As for Henry III., independent of the rival 
 parties, he was not master of a fortress or a soldier. He 
 had foreseen the coming storm, but had taken no pre- 
 cautions for procuring shelter or support. He first 
 wrote to the king of Navarre for aid against the Guises, 
 and ended by throwing himself into the arms of the 
 league, and declaring against Navarre. Catherine's ad- 
 dress, and the imbecility of Guise, (for Le Balafrc, the 
 assassin of St. Bartholomew's eve, wanted the talents 
 and the courage as well as the generosity of his father,) 
 saved Henry from being set aside as a cipher. He was 
 allowed to place himself at the head of the league. In 
 obedience to it, he issued ordonnances, prohibiting the 
 reformed worship on pain of death, and banishing out 
 of the kingdom all who previously adhered to it. Ten 
 principal fortresses of the kingdom were given up to 
 the leaguers, and war was declared against Henry of 
 Navarre. 
 
 That prince was astounded on learning the success of 
 the league, and its absorption, as it were, of the royal 
 power. His first thought was the hopelessness of resist- 
 ance; his next, that but one path was open to him to 
 perish gloriously. In his indignation against the perfidy 
 of Guise he despatched a challenge to that duke, defying 
 him to single combat, and calling heaven to witness that 
 he took that step, not from vain bravado or despite, but 
 for the sake of deciding briefly a quarrel, which would 
 otherwise cost the lives of thousands. Guise returned 
 no answer to the chivalrous appeal. Friends in the 
 mean time rallied to support the king of Navarre. Mont- 
 morency declared for him. His companions, La Roche- 
 foucault, De Rohan, Biron, and Turenne, joined him. 
 Conde and his friend la Tremouille also hastened to 
 his court. Knights were not wanting. But the days 
 were past when the noblesse were of themselves all-suf- 
 ficient for war. A sturdy and disciplined infantry was 
 wanting as well as funds for its maintenance. Bourbon
 
 1587- BATTLE OP COUTRAS. 337 
 
 was without either. Rosny, his friend, set out to sell 
 his woods in Normandy : the countess of Grammont, 
 his mistress, exchanged her jewels for gold; both to con- 
 tribute their mite to the scanty treasures of the prince 
 in his distress. 
 
 Notwithstanding the love universally borne to the 
 king of Navarre he was unable to collect more than 
 four or five thousand men to resist two armies, each of 
 them 20,000 strong, commanded by the duke of May- 
 enne, the brother of Guise, and by the marechal de 
 Matignon. Fortunately the leaguers had neither union 
 nor vigour, and were without military talents of any 
 kind. Whenever they succeeded in surprising Bourbon, 
 and in surrounding his small forces, his nimble Basques 
 separated at a word. He himself imitating them, made 
 his way through the hostile lines, and the leaguers soon 
 heard of the distant exploits of one whom they deemed 
 in their power. He had at the same time to defend 
 himself with other weapons against other foes. Pope Six- 
 tus issued excommunications against him and the prince 
 of Conde. This gave him the opportunity of sending 
 forth an indignant and eloquent defence, which he suc- 
 ceeded in getting affixed to the palace of the pontiff. 
 
 Henry III. was not displeased at the ill success of 
 the generals of the league. It allowed him to assume 
 more power; and he took upon him to give the com- 
 mand of the army, in the following year, to one of his 
 favourites, Joyeuse, a brave and rash stripling. Thus, a 
 victory would bring triumph and influence to one imme- 
 diately attached to him, whilst a defeat would humble 
 the overbearing party that constrained him to war. Joy- 
 euse was eager to distinguish himself. With a small army 
 he pressed closely upon the king of Navarre, who was at 
 the head of still smaller numbers. The battle took place 
 at Coutras, a little town, not many leagues from Bor- 
 deaux. The army of Joyeuse was chiefly composed of 
 young nobles and gay courtiers, covered with finery and 
 unused to war, although not lacking courage. The king 
 of Navarre placed his infantry on either side, in columns,
 
 338 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 158?. 
 
 his cavalry in the midst, divided into squadrons, each 
 presenting a rank of fifty in front, though not six deep. 
 His tactics were evidently of the old chivalric kind : he 
 depended on the valour of the mounted gentlemen, rather 
 than on the mass of vulgar infantry; whilst his own 
 personal courage was not his least resource. After a pre- 
 lude of cannon, Sully directing ably the artillery of his 
 sovereign, the catholics began to attack with such fury, 
 that they broke the squadrons on the right under Tu- 
 renne. The army of Navarre forming a semicircle, the 
 king was in the centre, considerably behind his wings, 
 and concealed by a rising ground. Joyeuse, seeing the 
 success of his first attack, led on his battle, or principal 
 squadron. But the horses were fatigued ere they reached 
 their enemies. In consequence, the charge was languid ; 
 the lance became useless ; while, with the sword, the 
 king of Navarre and his hardy warriors were far more 
 formidable than the effeminate courtiers of Henry III. 
 These were speedily vanquished, and Joyeuse himself 
 was slain. Bourbon grappled with the standard-bearer 
 of the enemy, crying out, " Rends-toi, Philistin!" "Sur- 
 render, Philistine !" No doubt the preachers that thronged 
 and fought in the field had compared him, in their ser- 
 mons, to king David ; and Henry preserved a humorous 
 recollection of the comparison even in the heat of action. 
 The battle had begun, on the part of the huguenots, with 
 a prayer and a psalm. It was made to end with one ; 
 the ministers shouting forth, as their paean, one of the 
 psalms of Marot 
 
 La voici 1'hcurcuse journ^e, 
 Ou Dieu couronne ses I'lus! 
 
 Bourbon was unable to follow up this splendid vic- 
 tory: he was totally without funds. In some pacific 
 conferences, Gonzaga duke of Nevers, one of the Italians 
 introduced into France by the queen-mother, taunted 
 him with his inability to raise the smallest sum, even in 
 Rochelle. Not being able to deny the fact, the king of 
 Navarre replied with sharpness, "That is because we 
 have no Italian financiers among us." The army of
 
 1587- TUB VICTORY FRUITLESS. 339 
 
 the huguenots was thus composed merely of volun- 
 teers. After the victory of Coutras, chief and soldier 
 were eager to return home. They disbanded, and Bour- 
 bon was obliged to retreat. An army of German pro- 
 testants had entered France in the commencement of 
 the campaign, and had marched across the country to 
 aid their allies in the cause of the reformation. They 
 found the passage of the Loire impracticable, and were 
 obliged to abandon their design. Harassed by the duke 
 of Guise, who watched and followed them, without 
 a leader of talent or authority, this powerful army of 
 auxih'aries was likely to produce no advantage to the 
 huguenots. Could the king of Navarre have joined 
 them, he might have crushed the league in its birth, 
 But he was now without a force. Henry III. joined in 
 person the army led by Guise. Neither the king nor the 
 duke attempted battle or exploit, until the Germans, 
 worn and dispirited, began to make their retreat in se- 
 parate bands. Guise attacked some of these, and in- 
 dulged his propensities for slaughter. His partisans 
 extolled his success, which considerably increased his 
 popularity; whilst the imbecile monarch of France sunk 
 deeper every day in absurdity and insignificance. Like 
 many silly persons, the king was prodigiously fond of 
 sumptuous funerals. That of Joyeuse was magnificent 
 beyond example, and consoled the monarch for the loss 
 of his friend. Epcrnon, created duke, was now the sur- 
 viving minion; and he monopolised the extravagant fa- 
 vour of Henry. His insolence and prodigality accorded 
 with his situation, and tended to increase and keep alive 
 the contempt entertained by the people for their so- 
 vereign. Henry now created him admiral of France, 
 and gave him the government of Normandy. 
 
 Such absurd prodigality of honours, towards a mere 
 minion, at the very time when the successes of Guise 
 claimed reward, excited the indignation of the duke, and 
 of the Parisians, who adored him. The catholics had in 
 part caught up the religious fervour, the scriptural allu- 
 sions, and the turns of expression, peculiar to the hu- 
 z 2
 
 340 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1588. 
 
 guenots. Guise was their Gideon, their Maccabeus, the 
 rod of the heretics, the saviour and support of the ortho- 
 dox. The citizens of Paris, at the instigation of the 
 league, had organised their means of resistance. The 
 town was divided into sixteen quarters, each of which 
 appointed a deputy; and thus was formed a council of 
 sixteen, or seize. The body was known by the name of 
 the Seize. They drew up a muster-roll of the armed 
 citizens, and found their numerical amount to be 20,000. 
 This was an army on which the league might depend. 
 
 In the commencement of 1588, the Guises sum- 
 moned a meeting of their partisans at Nancy. The 
 Parisians were earnest in entreating the duke to de- 
 clare himself openly, and dethrone the imbecile Henry. 
 But Guise still hesitated. Catholic historians vaunt, 
 amongst other virtues, the resolution of the duke; yet 
 never was conspirator more deficient in that necessary 
 quality. In reply, the duke urged the Parisians of them- 
 selves to seize the king, while they joined in one of his 
 devout processions ; and he sent some of his followers to 
 organise and direct the attempt. The sixteen did not 
 want either zeal or courage to follow this advice, by 
 which Guise sought to reap the advantage, without in- 
 curring the peril. But the citizens had one amongst them, 
 named Poulain, who betrayed all their measures to the 
 court. Henry, in consequence, kept himself close in the 
 Louvre, and the plans of capture became impracticable. 
 Epernon was despatched to Normandy to make sure of 
 the principal towns, and to muster such a force as might 
 awe the capital. 
 
 The sixteen, finding their intrigues discovered, were 
 moved by fear of punishment, in addition to their zeal 
 and their hatred towards the king : they therefore sent 
 a fresh summons to Guise, entreating him to proceed to 
 Paris, and brave the monarch openly. The duke could 
 no longer recede, without fear of disgusting his party. 
 He summoned resolution, though without any very fixed 
 plan, and advanced towards Paris. On his way he received 
 a mandate from Henry not to approach. He, however.
 
 1588. GXJISE ENTERS PARIS. 341 
 
 continued his march, for the purpose, he said, of plead- 
 ing his own cause. His entry into Paris took place on 
 the 9th of May. No troops accompanied him ; but the 
 citizens soon formed around him the most formidable 
 escort, even kissing his garments, and displaying other 
 signs of extravagant affection. 
 
 Instead of proceeding to his own hotel the duke 
 alighted at that of the queen-mother, who was startled, 
 and even terrified at the visit. Guise, however, appeased 
 her fears by such good humour and gaiety, and such 
 professions of loyalty, that Catherine proposed that they 
 should both set out to the Louvre to visit the king. 
 Catherine loved above all things to effect reconciliation, 
 to be herself the arbiter, and to negotiate the terms. 
 Guise consented. His consent strikes me as an act of 
 irresolution, not of courage. Catherine sent word pri- 
 vately to the Louvre, that she was coming thither with 
 the duke of Guise. Henry was thunderstruck at his 
 enemy's boldness. What did he seek ? For what pur- 
 pose did he thus come, to brave him? The king 
 asked advice of those near him. A colonel of his guards 
 declared that he was ready to run Guise through the 
 body. Henry applauded his zeal, but bade him wait 
 the signal. The abbe d'Elbene gave the same advice. 
 " Strike the shepherd," said he, " and the sheep will 
 disperse." But Henry was irresolute ; and his other 
 counsellors, who feared the consequences of exasperating 
 the populace, advised that no attempt should be made 
 upon the duke's life. In the midst of this consultation 
 the queen and Guise arrived. The Louvre was full of 
 guards, whom the duke took care to salute with his 
 wonted affability. But Crillon, their commander, gave 
 way to a gesture of impatience and contempt, which 
 startled Guise, and showed him all the danger of his 
 position. Consultations were still going on in the king's 
 chamber, when Catherine and the duke entered. There 
 was no time for dissimulation. Henry showed all his 
 anger. " Did I not forbid you to approach Paris ? " 
 were the words with which he addressed the duke. The 
 z 3
 
 342 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1588. 
 
 latter partly denied having received the express order, 
 and partly excused himself for disobeying it. Henry 
 listened to something that Bellievre whispered to 
 him, still looking steadfastly on the duke. Catherine 
 approached the king at the moment, and Guise could 
 hear her using the language of dissuasion. He saw that it 
 was a question whether to slay or spare him ; and saw 
 also that fear of the multitude, whose clamours were 
 heard from without, alone saved him from the medi- 
 tated blow. Henry seemed convinced by the arguments 
 of Catherine. Guise, pretending fatigue, hastily retired. 
 
 Whatever were the previous views or resolves of 
 Guise, the danger that had menaced him in the inter- 
 view determined him in future to keep no terms with 
 the king. On reaching his hotel, in the rue St. Antoine, 
 he summoned the sixteen, and made arrangements for 
 an immediate revolt. He had, nevertheless, two days 
 after, another interview with Henry, when he took care 
 to be well guarded : it was Catherine who arranged it, 
 in the hope of an accommodation ; but it proved 
 fruitless. 
 
 On the morning of the 12th of May, a large body of 
 troops arrived to reinforce the Swiss and French guards. 
 Henry ordered them to occupy the principal positions of 
 the capital. The sight of the soldiers was a signal plain 
 enough for the Parisians, who, instructed by Guise, 
 instantaneously set about forming barricades in every 
 street. Chains extended from house to house ; carts 
 and barrels formed their hasty intrenchments, which 
 were heaped and filled with earth. Crillon, who had 
 orders to keep the communication open betwixt the 
 Louvre and the Bastille, was obliged to retreat from the 
 rue St. Antoine. Notwithstanding his reinforcements 
 the king was prisoner in his palace. Almost whilst I 
 write, Paris has seen a renewal of these identical barri- 
 cades, which tradition might have counselled. Some 
 coincidences are singular. The barricade of the rue 
 St. Antoine was in both cases first attacked. The 
 Louvre has been in the nineteenth, as it was in the six*
 
 1588. FLIGHT OP THE KINO. 343 
 
 teenth century, the head-quarters of French and Swiss 
 guards mingled. The Swiss were doomed then, as since, 
 to slaughter. A post of them was surrounded in the 
 Cemetery of the Innocents, now the market of the same 
 name, and slain by the partisans of the league, notwith- 
 standing their supplicating cries of Bon catholique, 
 bon catholique ! The king was at length obliged to fly 
 from his palace, and take refuge, first at Chartres, and 
 then at Rouen. 
 
 Many of the historians of the time cast blame alike 
 on Henry for not having assassinated Guise, and on 
 Guise for allowing Henry to escape. The crime out of 
 the question, Guise was not sorry for the king's flight. 
 The traitor wanted audacity, and always crouched in 
 his sovereign's presence ; but now he was master of the 
 capital, and of a potent force, he was no longer over* 
 shadowed or controlled. His efforts were directed to le- 
 galise his usurpation, and his first attempt was to bend 
 the president, Achille de Harlai, to his views. De 
 Harlai looked at Guise, and then replied, " 'Tig 
 pitiable when the valet expels his master ; as for me, 
 my soul belongs to my Maker, and my fidelity to the 
 king ; my body alone is in the hands of the wicked. 
 You talk of assembling the parliament : when the ma 
 jesty of the prince is violated, the magistrate is without 
 authority." 
 
 This opposition, as well as the inch'nation of the 
 Parisians themselves, after the excitation of their revolt 
 was over, to treat with the king and make use of his 
 name at least, led Guise into more moderate measures. 
 He proposed an arrangement, on condition that he should 
 be appointed lieutenant-general of the kingdom, and 
 that the states-general should be summoned at Blois to 
 decide existing differences. Henry was weak enough to 
 accede to these terms, and to sanction them by an edict 
 of union, to the great discontent of Epernon, who at 
 this juncture showed an indignant spirit that did him 
 honour. As for Guise, his whole attentions were wisely 
 directed towards the composition of the states, and the 
 z 4
 
 344 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1588. 
 
 appointment of deputies in his interest. For this he 
 postponed the war against the king of Navarre, and 
 overlooked the feeble acts of the king, who showed his 
 authority at this time by totally changing the members 
 of his council. 
 
 The opening of the states took place at Blois on the 
 l6th of October. The duke of Guise, as grand master 
 of the household, presided over the arrangements. The 
 king, than whom no one knew better how to support 
 dignity upon occasion, spoke with mildness and address, 
 venturing a slight reflection upon the turbulence of the 
 late events ; as if to try the temper of the assembly. 
 Their silence showed them fully in the interests of the 
 league ; and Henry was obliged to retrench the offensive 
 words in the copy of his speech that was printed. Guise 
 henceforth began to advance in his demands. He wish- 
 ed to be constable as well as lieutenant-general, and to 
 have a guard ; but Henry showed adroitness in parrying 
 all these attacks against his authority on the part of the 
 states, as well as on that of the duke. The king, indeed, 
 was superior in sagacity at this time to his rival, who 
 proceeded irresolutely and vaguely, but gradually, to- 
 wards the goal of his ambition. Henry saw clearly that 
 it was now a struggle for life and death between him 
 and the usurper. One must fall ; and he, in falling, 
 would probably not be spared. He therefore made his 
 resolve, one from which it might be said that an 
 accomplice of Charles IX. on St. Bartholomew's eve 
 need not shrink. It was a crime ; yet if the past 
 weakness of Henry had not constituted the force of 
 Guise, never would crime have been more amply excused 
 by a sense of self-preservation 'and necessity. 
 
 Henry determined, in a word, to assassinate the duke. 
 He consulted the brave Crillon. That soldier proposed 
 to challenge Guise, and by sacrificing his own life in 
 the combat make sure of slaying his adversary. He 
 spurned the proposal to act the assassin, but promised 
 to keep the king's secret. Henry found others less 
 scrupulous than Crillon. Guise, in the mean time, was
 
 1588. GUISE ASSASSINATED. 345 
 
 repeatedly warned of these hostile intentions : he affected 
 to despise them, but he took every precaution. The 
 king summoned a council to be held on the morning of 
 the 23d of December : he wished, he said, to have the 
 rest of the day for a party of pleasure. So early, Guise 
 was not attended by his intimate band. As he mounted 
 the stairs to council, the officers of the guard surrounded 
 him, and used the most supplicating entreaties that he 
 would procure for them their month's pay. This crowd 
 of petitioners kept off the duke's friends, and he entered 
 the council chamber alone. Here, however, were num- 
 bers : the council was, in fact, assembled. Yet Guise, 
 it is said, felt a misgiving : he was even unwell, and 
 was obliged to call for a restoring draught. Perhaps he 
 recollected the entreaties of his mistress, who that morn- 
 ing in vain endeavoured to dissuade him from attending 
 the council. At this moment the king sent to summon 
 Guise to his cabinet : the duke obeyed, and was engaged 
 in lifting the tapestry of the door, when he was beset, 
 his sword seized, and his body pierced by a number of 
 wounds. His brother, the cardinal de Guise, was sent 
 to prison, where he was soon after despatched by the 
 halberds of his guards. Thus perished the original 
 planners of the massacre of St. Bartholomew. Those 
 who see the vengeance of heaven declared in the violent 
 deaths of the perpetrators, in the misfortunes and ex- 
 tinction of their race, are not contradicted by these events. 
 Twelve days after the assassination of the Guises 
 expired the queen-mother, Catherine of Medicis, almost 
 forgotten in the turmoil of the moment. Indeed, for a 
 long time she had been usee, according to the French 
 expression, which may mean " morally worn out." No 
 individual had ever produced a more pernicious effect 
 upon a country, than she had produced upon France. 
 She introduced those habits of dissimulation and Ma- 
 chiavelian policy for which her country was famed. 
 She taught them to her children, and communicated 
 them to her court. When united, as they were in her, 
 to extreme licentiousness of private morals, we can
 
 346 HISTORY OF FHAXCE. 1589- 
 
 scarcely imagine a more perfect combination of wicked- 
 ness. Such she became in the acts of her later life, 
 which, from their enormity and blackness, have cast a 
 shade over her earlier career ; so that whilst struggling 
 for tolerance, or listening to the counsels of de 1'Ho- 
 pital, Catherine is depicted as, even at that time, per- 
 fidious and ill intentioned. Truth is here sacrificed to 
 the unity of the picture, to the imaginary consistency of 
 a character. Human nature contradicts this, and sanc- 
 tions the common proverb, " That no one of a sudden 
 becomes a monster." * 
 
 The exasperation of the Parisians on learning the 
 fate of the Guises knew no bounds. It was at first, 
 indeed, stifled by fear ; but, as the king showed no 
 vigour to follow up the blow, grief soon burst forth in 
 the accents of rage. The church was not slow to avenge 
 its martyrs. The murder of Guise was an inexhaustible 
 theme of eloquence to the preachers ; that of his brother, 
 a cardinal, was an impiety beyond the power of language 
 to execrate. Henry was declared an heretic, an idolater. 
 Processions were ordered to call down vengeance on the 
 royal assassin ; the nudity of both sexes, who mingled in 
 them, being considered the attribute of the ceremony 
 most acceptable. The church, in its rage, seemed to vie 
 in absurd frivolity with the monarch whom it attacked. 
 The priests of one of the principal churches in Paris 
 made a route, or waxen image, of Henry of Valois, so 
 the king was now designated ; and the people were told 
 to prick it devoutly with pins, in order to kill this 
 modern Herod. More rational measures of hostility 
 were at the same time taken. The duke of Mayenne, 
 one of the surviving brothers of Guise, was declared 
 head of the league. The loyal chiefs of the judicature 
 were committed to prison. Rome was summoned to 
 issue its anathemas ; Spain to send her aid ; and an 
 army marched against Henry, who was now at Tours, 
 beyond the Loire. 
 
 For that monarch there was now no refuge but to fling 
 
 - * Nemo repentc fuit turpissimus.
 
 1589- THE KING JOINS HENRY OF NAVARRE. 347 
 
 himself into the party of the huguenots and the king 
 of Navarre. He dreaded and hesitated to take this step. 
 He was superstitious, and shrunk from an alliance with 
 heretics ; but the leaguers would not listen to his pro- 
 posals of accommodation. Bourbon advanced with an 
 army. He was warned not to trust himself to the 
 assassin-prince, the perfidious son of Catherine ; but 
 he dared all, won instantly by his frankness upon the 
 king, dissipated his mistrust, and the two monarchs 
 entered into the most cordial understanding. Many 
 nobles, disgusted with the Guises, and encouraged by 
 the late acts of rigour, however criminal, rallied to 
 Henry ; and the latter soon found himself at the head 
 of a formidable army of united protestants and catholics. 
 Mayenne had as yet no force capable of resisting him. 
 Henry marched without opposition to Paris, invested it, 
 and took up his own quarters at St. Cloud. 
 
 The rage of the Parisians increased with their impo- 
 tence. They had been beaten near Senlis, and could 
 not hope to defeat the royal army. They made prepar- 
 ations, however, for a vigorous defence. Of all the par- 
 tisans of the league none regarded its present distress 
 with so much impatience as the sister of the late duke 
 of Guise, the duchess of Montpensier. She had ever been 
 enthusiastic in its behalf; and was known to wear a pair 
 of golden scissors for the purpose, she was wont to say, 
 of marking the tonsure on the head of Henry of Valois, 
 and thus converting him into a monk. She had now, 
 however, her brothers to avenge, and all means seemed 
 justifiable to her. 
 
 Among those whom her penetration discerned as fit 
 instruments of her vengeance, was Jaques Clement, a 
 young Dominican friar, zealously attached to his reli- 
 gion, sombre, fanatic, voluptuous. He always announced 
 the purpose of slaying with his own hand the great 
 enemy of his faith. But he was far from being resolved 
 or nerved for the attempt, until the duchess of Mont- 
 pensier, learning his vague purpose, sent for him, and 
 excited him by all the inducements of favour, flattery,
 
 348 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 1589- 
 
 and condescension, to carry it into execution. Thus 
 wound up to resolution, and emboldened by the leaguers, 
 who pretended to imprison one hundred of the most no- 
 table citizens as hostages for his safety, Clement set out for 
 St. Cloud. He was provided with letters for Henry from 
 de Harlai, and from the count de Brienne, both pri- 
 soners, who were made to consider him a trusty mes- 
 senger. The friar, thus provided, was taken by the 
 outposts, of whom he boldly demanded access to speak 
 with the king. There were some objections made to the 
 admission of a stranger; but Henry over-ruled them, 
 observing, that he could not refuse to see an ecclesiastic. 
 Clement was, therefore, introduced : he fell on his knees, 
 presented his letters, and whilst Henry was engaged in 
 opening them, the friar stabbed him in the lower part 
 of the stomach. The king exclaimed, " The wicked 
 monk ! he has killed me ;" and, drawing out the knife, 
 struck Clement with it. The attendants rushed in at the 
 moment, and slew the assassin. At first the wound was 
 not considered mortal ; but on the following day its 
 fatal effects became evident. Henry of Bourbon was 
 summoned to the dying monarch, who declared him his 
 successor ; but warned him, that he would never reign 
 over France unless he abandoned the creed of Calvin. 
 Henry III. expired on the 2d of August, 1589. 
 
 CHAP. X. 
 1589 1610. 
 
 HENRY THE FOURTH. 
 
 So far beyond the bounds of common sense and judgment 
 were men carried by the excitation of party, that the 
 late imbecile monarch was lamented as a hero in the 
 camp, whilst among the citizens his murder was cele- 
 brated as the most glorious triumph. The duchess of 
 Montpensier flung her arms round the neck of the mes-
 
 1589^ ACCESSION OF HENRY IV. 349 
 
 senger who brought the welcome tidings, crying, " Ah, 
 my friend, is it true ? is the monster veritably dead ? 
 what a gratification ! I am only grieved to think he 
 did not know it was I that directed the blow." She 
 herself then went forth to spread the news. Of all or- 
 ders of men the priesthood were most delighted : they 
 were in ecstasies. Clement was declared a saint and a 
 martyr, nay a deity. A statue was erected to him, with 
 the inscription, " St. Jaques Clement, pray for us sin- 
 ners ! " His mother was addressed with the same scrip- 
 tural salutation that was applied to the mother of our 
 Lord. Nor was this the mere enthusiasm and fanatic 
 madness of the subordinate pastors ; the great shepherd, 
 their infallible head, the pope himself, joined in all 
 the impiety. The pontiff Sextus V. pronounced in 
 person a public eulogium on St. Jaques Clement, and on 
 the act of regicide, which he represented, from the very 
 chair of St. Peter, as comparable with the incarnation 
 and resurrection of the Saviour. 
 
 The first act meditated by Henry of Bourbon, now, 
 on the extinction of the line of Valois, king of France 
 as well as of Navarre, was to give assault to the guilty 
 capital. But dissension was in his camp. Such im- 
 pression had the arguments of the league made even 
 upon its opponents, that the catholic royalists in the 
 service of the last king hesitated to recognise Henry IV. 
 as king of France. They at last acknowledged his title; 
 but this act of acquiescence was accompanied with a re- 
 quest that he would again adopt the catholic faith. 
 Henry had never been a bigot ; he was not much 
 attached to any form of faith. In his childhood he was 
 a catholic, in his boyhood a protestant, in youth forced 
 to be a catholic again ; and when he embraced the re- 
 formed religion on his escape from court, we may sup- 
 pose him to have been more influenced by resentment 
 towards his enemies and gratitude towards his friends, 
 than by any profound conviction. A gallant and a sol- 
 dier, he was but little addicted to study or reflection ; 
 and although Henry yielded not to the zealots of either
 
 350 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 158Q. 
 
 side in practical piety, and in truly Christian benevolence, 
 yet it may be supposed that he was very indifferent as 
 to tenets. In all his manifestoes, from the very com- 
 mencement of the troubles, he shows himself not averse 
 to Catholicism. It was the compulsory adoption of it 
 that he resented. " How," he asked, " was his conver- 
 sion attempted ? With the dagger to his throat." 
 Henry had, years before, offended his friend Mornay, a 
 stern calvinist, by his indifference on this point, and 
 even previous to his alliance with the late king he had 
 declared himself open to conviction. He, in fact, al- 
 ways contemplated his conversion to the catholic faith as 
 a possibility. His principle was to do this with honour, 
 to make his conscience yield voluntarily, but never under 
 circumstances of constraint. He, therefore, at the pre- 
 sent moment, rejected the demands of the royalists : and 
 they, with Epemon at their head, abandoned the new 
 monarch to his h'ttle band of huguenots ; and even that 
 force, too insignificant to be called an army, Henry was 
 obliged to divide ; a detachment under one of his cap- 
 tains being required to oppose the Spaniards, who 
 threatened an invasion of Picardy. Issuing, therefore, 
 his first edict, which promised every surety and support 
 to the catholic religion, and which summoned the states- 
 general of the kingdom to meet at Tours, in October, 
 the king retreated towards the sea-coast, resolving to 
 await, in the neighbourhood of Dieppe, the succours 
 that he had requested from Elizabeth of England. 
 
 The duke of Mayenne, now chief of the league, 
 caused the cardinal of Bourbon to be declared king, by 
 the return of the parliament. He was proclaimed under 
 the unlucky name of Charles X. As this mock monarch 
 was a prisoner at Tours, Mayenne had no one to inter- 
 fere with his authority ; and he was himself declared 
 lieutenant-general of the kingdom. The duke lost no 
 time in endeavours to signalise his new command. At 
 the head of upwards of 20,000 men he marched in 
 pursuit of the huguenots, promising the Parisians to 
 bring the A r avarroin captive in a few days.
 
 1589- BATTLE OF ARQUES. 351 
 
 Henry was near Dieppe with his little army, consist- 
 ing of 3000 French infantry, two regiments of Swiss, 
 some lansquenets, and a troop of gallant followers, con- 
 stituting his cavalry. As soon as he learned Mayenne's 
 approach he retired from the town, the defences of 
 which his little army could not man, and posted himself 
 in and around the castle of Arques, which is northward 
 of Dieppe, and about four miles distant. Many present 
 counselled Henry to embark, and put himself in safety 
 beyond the sea, but Biron opposed this with all his 
 might. " Here we are in France ; and here let us be 
 buried," exclaimed he : " fly now, and all your hopes 
 vanish with the wind that bears you." The words 
 which Biron spoke were accordant to the resolution of 
 his master ; and every effort was henceforth directed to 
 entrench the camp, which stretched from the chateau of 
 Arques to the little village of the same name. The 
 advanced post was a lazaretto or hospital for lepers. 
 
 Mayenne arrived with his army in sight of Arques, 
 about the middle of September, and betrayed the dila- 
 toriness of his disposition in hesitating and making 
 divers partial attacks. The cannon of the chateau pro- 
 tected the royal army; and Mayenne, with all his supe- 
 riority, was not confident that he should carry the 
 intrenchments. At length, on the 23d, he prepared to 
 keep his promise of overpowering the king. He attacked 
 the lazaretto with a large force of lansquenets. On 
 Henry's side fought also a few of those German merce- 
 naries. After some skirmishing the lansquenets of the 
 league advanced ; not, however, in hostile attitudes, but 
 with their caps on their pikes, and shouting " Vive Je 
 roi !". in token of amity. Their compatriots within the 
 intrenchments welcomed them, and even helped them 
 to get between the lines. The assault being at the same 
 time given on other points, the lansquenets, either chang- 
 ing their minds, or acting upon a treacherous intention, 
 formed at the very first, and ran upon the Swiss with their 
 pikes. The leaguers poured over the intrenchments in 
 the confusion : Biron was surrounded : from the very first
 
 352 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1589- 
 
 the stoutest friends of Henry gave up the battle, and 
 looked upon his cause as lost. The monarch was almost 
 deserted ; his nobles had sallied out to charge the cavalry 
 of the enemy, and there was, at the very moment, a 
 sanguinary conflict and melee of cavaliers upon the 
 plain. " In all France are there not fifty gentlemen to 
 die with their king ?" cried Henry in despair, and he 
 seized a lance to fight with the Swiss. Chatillon, the 
 son of Coligny, had just come up, and was near enough 
 to hear his prince's ejaculation. He answered it by 
 uniting his efforts to those of Henry. The Swiss by 
 this time had rallied : the fifty gentlemen whom the 
 king in despair had summoned were by his side ; Henry 
 charged at their head the successful leaguers, routed the 
 lansquenets, and drove them back over the intrench- 
 ments. The lazaretto itself was soon freed, and May- 
 enne was completely worsted. 
 
 It was after this victory that Henry IV. wrote to 
 Crillon, " Hang thyself, brave Crillon ! we have fought 
 at Arques, and thou wast not there. Adieu ! brave 
 Crillon ! je vous aime a tort et d trovers." 
 
 The leaguers retreated to Picardy, in hopes of being 
 supported by the Spaniards. Henry, reinforced by the 
 long expected English, advanced to Paris, and well nigh 
 surprised the affrighted capital. The tower and gate de 
 Nesle, situated where the Institute now stands, was then 
 the limit of Paris.* La Noue swam his horse round by 
 the river, but was driven back by musketry ; whilst the 
 petard applied by Chatillon to the gate would not ex- 
 plode. The royalists avenged themselves by the plunder 
 of the Fauxbourg St. Germain, which yielded a rich 
 booty. Sully had 3000 crowns for his share. There 
 was much cruelty on both sides ; the Parisians hanging 
 those whom they suspected, and Biron retaliating on the 
 prisoners he had made. Winter did not interrupt the 
 fury of the war, which raged all through the kingdom. 
 Henry employed his arms in reducing several towns in 
 
 * There is a picture by Wouvermans in the Louvre, which represents the 
 Tour de Nesle, then the gate of Paris, with the Pont Neuf in the distance.
 
 1590. BATTLE OF 1VRY. 358 
 
 Normandy. In the spring of 1590 he was engaged in 
 the siege of Dreux, when the duke of Mayenne, rein- 
 forced by a body of Spaniards, advanced to relieve the 
 town, and try his fortune once more in war against 
 Bourbon. 
 
 The king did not tarry at Dreux, but advanced to the 
 rencontre. The two armies came in presence on the 
 evening of the 13th of March. Both encamped on the 
 plain of Ivry, destined, on the morrow, to be the field of 
 battle. The leaguers amounted to 1 6,000; the royalists 
 were far inferior in number. On the eve of action, 
 de Schomberg, the general of the German auxiliaries, 
 was pressed by his troops to ask Henry for their pay. 
 The king, destitute of funds, was irritated at the request. 
 " A man of courage," he replied, " would not have 
 asked for money on the eve of battle." The next morn- 
 ing, while preparing for action, Henry perceived the 
 general, and thus accosted him : " Schomberg, I have 
 insulted you, and as this day may be the last of my life, 
 I would not carry away the honour of a gentleman, and 
 be unable to restore it. I know your valour, and ask 
 your pardon : embrace me." " Your majesty wounded 
 me yesterday you kill me to-day," replied the veteran, 
 overcome ; and he spoke truth, for he perished in the 
 battle. 
 
 The king was most in dread of the Spanish lances. 
 His own cavalry, composed of gentlemen volunteers, had 
 long since rejected the lance as troublesome, and fought 
 with sword and pistol. Henry, therefore, divided them 
 into small squadrons, that if one was broken, it might 
 rally to the others ; and he thus favoured his mode of 
 fighting, which was rather the ordering of combats man 
 to man, than the manoeuvring and shock of masses.* 
 Cavalry and infantry were mingled, regiment supported 
 regiment, and Biron commanded a corps of reserve. 
 After a prayer, in which Henry joined, he addressed his 
 officers ere he gave the signal, desiring, that if they 
 
 * This, no doubt, is the reason why Bonaparte spoke so slightingly of 
 Henry Quatre as a general. 
 
 VOL. I. A A
 
 354 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 
 
 should be obliged to quit the field, they would rally 
 towards three trees, which he pointed out on the right ; 
 " and if astray," added he, " follow my white plume ; 
 you will find it ever on the road to honour and to vic- 
 tory." 
 
 There was little order in the action : on one wing the 
 Germans of the league behaved ill and yielded ; on the 
 other the royalists were beaten, but Biron rallied them 
 with reinforcements. The combat was decided by the 
 central force of either army ; the count d'Egmont lead- 
 ing the Spaniards, and Mayenne the gentlemen of his 
 party, against the king. The leaguers were marshalled 
 too closely together. Henry's squadron got among them, 
 and a sanguinary melee ensued. The king was reported 
 to be killed, but soon showed his white plume in the 
 path that he had promised. Egmont was slain. The 
 standard-bearer of Mayenne fell by Henry's own hand ; 
 and the army of the leaguers was routed and driven from 
 the ground. Biron had overlooked the fight, reinforced 
 weak points, and rallied fugitives, whilst the monarch 
 himself fought. " Sire," said Biron, after the action, 
 " we changed places : you did Biron's duty ; Biron 
 yours." Sully, the friend of Henry, was found dis- 
 abled by a number of wounds on the field of battle. 
 
 The victory of Ivry enabled the king to reduce ah 1 the 
 small towns around Paris, and finally to invest the ca- 
 pital. His soldiers were anxious to take the city by 
 storm, and wreak vengeance on the stronghold of the 
 league. But Henry sought to spare his capital, and to 
 reduce it by winning rather than by forfeiting the esteem 
 of its inhabitants. He at the same time formed a 
 blockade, purposing, through famine, to subdue his ene- 
 mies. Mayenne had gone to Flanders, to seek aid from 
 Farnese, prince of Parma, general of king Philip in that 
 country. The duke of Nemours, uterine brother of the 
 Guises, commanded in the capital, supported by the 
 Spanish ambassador Mendoza, and the legate of the 
 pope. These personages exerted themselves to the ut- 
 most in engaging the Parisians to support the privations
 
 1590. PARIS BESIEGED. S55 
 
 of a siege. The priesthood walked in procession, armed 
 with sword and casque, and were reviewed by the legate, 
 who was much alarmed by the joyous firing of these 
 awkward recruits. Henry tried, by negotiation, to bring 
 the Parisians to terms, but the fanatical party was too 
 powerful. By way of menace, the huguenots assaulted 
 and took all the fauxbourgs, or suburbs, in one night ; 
 the king overlooking the general attack from his quar- 
 ters on Montmartre. The besieged were at length re- 
 duced to extremities, and began to eat all kinds of 
 loathsome aliments, carrion, ground bones, and even 
 human flesh. Their numbers were estimated at 230,000.* 
 The duke of Nemours sent away the useless mouths : 
 Henry took pity on the people thus driven forth, and 
 suffered them to pass his lines ; nay, he was even moved 
 with compassion towards the stubborn city, and granted 
 a passage to several convoys of provisions for its relief. 
 
 Mayenne, however, approached with the prince of 
 Parma, and Henry was obliged to leave his quarters 
 at Montmartre to combat the Spaniards. This diversion 
 was the sole aim of Farnese, who, retreating from the 
 king, fell suddenly upon Lagny, a town commanding 
 the course of the Marne, and took it. Provisions of all 
 kinds immediately floated down to Paris. In vain the 
 king challenged Farnese to action. The latter replied, 
 " It was the business of the king to force him." This 
 Henry could not do ; and the prince, having fully suc- 
 ceeded in relieving Paris, retired again into the Low 
 Countries. 
 
 This disappointment, at the moment when the royal- 
 ists were expecting to make themselves masters of the 
 capital, was almost tantamount to a defeat. The army, 
 as usual, became in a great measure disbanded when its 
 aim was gone; and, in the state of languor and inac- 
 tivity imposed on both sides, fresh parties sprang up, 
 
 * Perefixe estimates the population of Paris in that day at 300,000 ; but 
 this must appear an exaggeration, if we consider that the fauxhourgs were 
 not included. He says it was double that number in Louis XIV. 's reign, 
 an estimate also exaggerated, since Paris at the present moment does not 
 contain 900,000 inhabitants. 
 
 A A 2
 
 356 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1590. 
 
 and fresh intrigues were die consequence. Mayenne was 
 crossed by the Spaniards and the duke of Nemours. Henry 
 was pestered on one side by the catholics, who besought 
 his conversion ; on the other by the huguenots, who 
 threatened to abandon him if he took such a step. That 
 he had long meditated it, there is no doubt. On his ac- 
 cession he had promised to re-examine his conscience, 
 and to listen to the arguments of the orthodox. Policy, 
 not conviction, was now the chief, if not the only argu- 
 ment with him, in estimating creeds. The old cardinal 
 of Bourbon, the Charles X. of the league, was dead. His 
 nephew, now cardinal of Bourbon, began, though in the 
 interests of Henry, to entertain projects of ambition. He 
 succeeded in forming a new third party of catholics, op- 
 posed, however, to Mayenne, to Spain, and to the league; 
 attached to Henry, yet insisting on his conversion as in- 
 dispensable. The act which had been loudly demanded 
 by queen Elizabeth and the German princes, from whom 
 the king was then expecting aid, that celebrated edict 
 in favour of the protestants, the first that Henry issued, 
 at once offended the new party and strengthened the 
 league. The king was glad to escape from these in- 
 trigues to feats of war, by which, had he possessed funds 
 or armies, he would have soon decided the question, and 
 cut the Gordian knot of religious differences. He was 
 this year, however, obliged to confine himself to petty 
 enterprises. He took Chartres, and laid siege to Rouen. 
 Mayenne instantly summoned the prince of Parma to 
 march to the relief of this town. The prince negotiated, 
 and refused to stir until the town of La Fere was de- 
 livered to him. Philip II. had, in fact, separated his in- 
 terests from those of Mayenne : he now sought to turn 
 the league to his own advantage ; a selfish policy, that 
 contributed more than any other cause to establish Henry 
 on his throne. To this throne Philip hoped to elevate 
 his daughter the infanta, whom the young duke of Guise 
 was to espouse. The pope's legate seconded his views, 
 and Spanish gold gained the sixteen, who governed the 
 municipality of Paris.
 
 1592. SIEGE OF ROUEN. 357 
 
 The duke of Mayenne was at Soissons, expecting the 
 army of Farnese, when the sixteen sought to consum- 
 mate their authority. The personages who most stood 
 in their way were the chiefs of the parliament, and 
 Brisson, who, during the captivity of Harlai and of the 
 loyal members, had been promoted to the presidency. 
 He had become disgusted with the ferocity of the six- 
 teen, and had shown this in his judgments. A surrep- 
 titious order was procured for the execution of this 
 magistrate and two of his fellows ; and it was instantly 
 carried into effect by Bussi, a red-hot leaguer. This out- 
 rage disgusted and roused the citizens. Mayenne was 
 called to the capital. The murderers of Brisson, with 
 the exception of Bussi, were themselves hanged, and the 
 Parisians applauded the retribution. The sixteen were 
 deprived of their authority; and Mayenne, now aware 
 of the perfidy of Spain and the fickleness of the mob, 
 regained the influence with which he might either oppose 
 or treat with Henry. 
 
 The king pressed the siege of Rouen, when word was 
 brought that the prince of Parma had again entered 
 France. Leaving Biron in command of the siege, Henry 
 marched to meet him ; but had not force sufficient to 
 warrant his giving battle. At the head of merely a re- 
 connoitring party of an hundred horse, he was surprised 
 at Aumale by the prince of Parma's advanced guard. 
 Sully begged him to retire; but Henry, ever anxious to 
 exchange blows, fought in the rear; was exposed to the 
 most imminent danger ; and received a wound, fortun- 
 ately but slight, from a pistol-shot. It was on this occa- 
 sion that queen Elizabeth begged of him not to expose 
 his person so rashly. Mornay wrote, that " he had long 
 enough played the part of Alexander : it was time for 
 him to act Augustus." 
 
 This glory, however, served but to veil the disasters 
 of the campaign. Biron's force was routed by a sally of 
 the Rouennois, and the siege was completely raised. 
 Henry's bravest captains now began to fall around him. 
 La Noue had not long before perished in battle. Biron 
 A A 3
 
 358 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 
 
 was carried away by a cannon-shot at Epernay. The 
 force of the royalists alone could never, without con- 
 cessions, reduce the stubborn spirits of the league in 
 obedience to Henry. He therefore began seriously to 
 meditate on the expediency of taking the grand step of 
 recantation. 
 
 The states-general assembled at Paris in the com- 
 mencement of the year ] 593. The duke of Mayenne, 
 who trembled for his influence, attempted to divide the 
 assembly into five estates, placing the court, the great 
 officers of the crown, and governors of provinces, apart 
 from the small noblesse. The judicial body, or pre- 
 sidents of parliament, were also to be apart, as in the 
 time of Henry II. But this was over-ruled ; and the 
 ancient division of three estates prevailed. The avowed 
 object of the assembly was to elect a king. All agreed 
 that the existence of a protestant king was inadmissible; 
 a principle not irrational for zealous catholics, consider- 
 ing that the monarch was to possess absolute power, and 
 that his ordinances were to be laws. The wonder is, 
 that no guaranty was imagined in the form of a repre- 
 sentative body, invested with the right of assembling 
 and of sharing in legislative functions. But this amal- 
 gamation of monarchy and liberty was not yet consi- 
 dered feasible. Anxieties for freedom were lost in the 
 zeal for religious ascendancy; and all those fiery dema- 
 gogues, who represented the popular spirit, were in- 
 oculated with the bigotry, and bought with the gold, 
 of Spain. 
 
 There were, in fact, but three parties in the states. 
 First, the politiques, or catholics ; anxious not to inter- 
 rupt the legitimate line of succession, provided Henry 
 would recant. At the head of this were the great per- 
 sonages of the judicature. The second was the party 
 of Mayenne, the aristocracy of the league ; wavering 
 and unfixed in their choice and determinations. The 
 third, and the most powerful, was that of Spain, sup- 
 ported by the legate. They argued, that the Salic law 
 was not fundamental ; that females might succeed and
 
 1593- POLITICAL PARTIES. 359 
 
 reign in France ; and that Philip's daughter, the infanta, 
 had the best claim to the crown, in the right of her 
 mother Elizabeth, daughter of Henry II. 
 
 The views of the latter party were crossed by an 
 expedient which the king adopted, that of despatching 
 a request for an interview between the catholic nobles 
 of the army and those of the states. It took place at 
 Suresne, notwithstanding the dissuasions of the legate, 
 and the opposition of the Spaniards, who were still more 
 mortified at learning that Henry, in the very opening 
 of the conference, gave it to be understood that he was 
 willing to be converted. In fact, he was already en- 
 gaged in listening to the most learned doctors of the 
 catholics; while very many of the protestants, even of 
 the protestant divines, counselled him to accept Catho- 
 licism rather than perpetuate the civil war. The legate 
 and the Spanish party exerted themselves to do away 
 the effect of this concession. The legate threatened to 
 withdraw from the city, if negotiations were entered 
 into with a relapsed heretic, so he styled Henry. The 
 duke of Feria, relying too confidently on the Spanish 
 party in the states, proposed openly that the crown 
 should be voted to the infanta, who was to marry a 
 German prince. This proposal, though often mooted, 
 and not disapproved in private meetings, excited the ill 
 humour of the assembly, and especially incensed the 
 bishop of Sens, who, though a zealous leaguer, burst 
 forth into an invective against the selfishness of the 
 Spaniard. The old party of the league were highly of- 
 fended at the condition coupled with the proposal, by 
 which a German prince was to be brought forward. An 
 amendment was devised; and the Spanish party pro- 
 mised that the infanta, in the case of her election, should 
 espouse a prince of France or of Lorraine. This flattered 
 many competitors. The duke of Savoy became one of 
 their number, as did the cardinal of Bourbon, one of the 
 royalists of Henry's camp. The young duke of Guise, 
 had, however, the fairest hopes of the rich prize, when 
 the royalists of the league took a. decisive step in Henry's 
 
 A A 4
 
 30 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1593. 
 
 favour. Incited by the president Lemaitre, and Mole, 
 one of its chief officers, the parliament of Paris issued 
 a decree, declaring that the Salic law was in force, and 
 could not be abrogated ; and that the crown of France 
 could not pass to a stranger. Such a step as this required 
 eminent courage, considering that the successive chiefs 
 of the parliament had been imprisoned and murdered 
 for opposing the league. The fate of Brisson was of very 
 recent occurrence. At present, fortunately, the sixteen 
 were no more; and the demagogues in the Spanish in- 
 terest had lost influence over the people, who suffered 
 for want of provisions, and who now at last began to 
 long for peace. This act of courage on the part of the 
 judicature gave a severe check to the league ; and, by the 
 abjuration of the king, which took place in July, in the 
 cathedral of St. Denis, it received a blow from which it 
 could not be recovered by all the money of Spain or the 
 anathemas of the legate. 
 
 Henceforward almost the only victories of Henry 
 were those which he won over the hearts of his subjects 
 by his generosity, magnanimity, and patience. He 
 granted a truce ; he extended it, and showed the utmost 
 reluctance to use the sword, though the Parisians still 
 refused to receive him. The irresolute Mayenne had 
 again united his interests with those of Spain; but the 
 zeal of both had cooled; and the duke still remained at 
 enmity with the king, more from shame to submit than 
 from any hopes of successful resistance. Henry un- 
 ceasingly pursued the paths of conciliation. His am- 
 bassadors wore out the hostilities of the court of Rome, 
 where cardinal d'Ossat supported by his talents the 
 interests and character of his master. The extrava- 
 gant enthusiasm of the league had evaporated ; in part 
 it had been reasoned down by the mild and rational 
 philosophy promulgated in the Essays of Montaigne, 
 and in part scouted by the poignant ridicule of the 
 Satire Menippee. These are the two chief literary 
 works of the epoch ; the former sufficiently known to 
 every reader, the latter one of the finest specimens of
 
 1594. BRISSAC TREATS WITH HEXRY. 36l 
 
 political satire to be found in any language. It proved 
 to the leaguers what Hudibras proved to the English 
 puritans ; it exposed the absurdity and hidden sel- 
 fishness of fanaticism, and showed that ridicule might 
 be made a more effectual weapon than the sword. 
 
 As the influence of the league daily declined, even in 
 the capital, its remaining zealots exerted themselves to 
 stay the downfall of their cause. An assassin was su- 
 borned to make away with Henry IV. by the same 
 mode in which Henry III. had been removed. The 
 chief of the Jesuits in Paris, and a popular curate, 
 united to hire a person named Barrere for this diabolical 
 purpose. But Barrere wanted the zeal of Jaques Cle- 
 ment; missed his opportunity at one time, became faint- 
 hearted at another, was seized, and confessed his purpose 
 and its instigators. The open measures of defence 
 adopted by Mayenne were not more successful. He in 
 vain endeavoured to secure Paris to the league by re- 
 suscitating the power of the sixteen and of the rabble, 
 which he himself had formerly crushed. He removed 
 the military governor, and appointed in his place Brissac, 
 who might, he thought, be trusted. The duke's own 
 want of confidence, however, was betrayed by his quit- 
 ting the capital and bringing his family along with him. 
 Brissac failed not to treat with Henry ; and it was 
 arranged between them that the king should make his 
 entry into Paris on the 22d of March. 
 
 On the day previous Brissac took occasion to despatch 
 a body of the Spanish garrison to surprise a convoy of 
 provisions which, he pretended, were for the army of 
 Henry. Under similar pretexts he dispersed and wearied 
 the troops most attached to the league. The Spanish 
 envoy, the duke of Feria, conceived some suspicions, 
 and communicated them to Brissac, who affected the 
 utmost zeal and activity, and summoned the principal 
 citizens to the Hotel de Ville. To them he frankly 
 disclosed his intentions, which were warmly seconded 
 by L'Huillier, provost of the merchants, and by the 
 sheriffs of the city. Every preparatory measure was
 
 862 HISTORY OF FUAXCE. 1 5Q4:. 
 
 taken. The troops of Henry were to arrive by two in 
 the morning at the gates, which were opened and un- 
 blocked. Henry hesitated long ; he was fully aware of 
 the danger of engaging in the narrow streets of a city, 
 which had shown itself so inveterate, and amidst a 
 population whose fanatic zeal might be roused by a 
 chance word or a random shot. The enterprise pros- 
 pered, however, beyond his wishes. The sixteen and 
 their partisans were either scattered, or blockaded in 
 their houses : every gate and post of importance through- 
 out the city was in the hands of the royalists ere day 
 lighted up the triumph of the king to the awakened 
 eyes of those who were not in the secret. But a single 
 post of Spanish troops made resistance, and theirs was 
 the only blood that was shed upon this joyous occasion. 
 Henry having been presented with the keys by the 
 provost L'Huillier, and having invested Brissac with 
 the white sash of the Bourbon party, in lieu of the 
 embroidered one, of which the marshal made an offering, 
 entered his capital by the Porte Neuve, or New Gate, 
 which was opposite the Tuileries, and within the pre- 
 cincts of that palace. No voice save those of acclama- 
 tion hailed him, whilst he proceeded to return thanks 
 in the cathedral of Notre Dame. He then took up his 
 quarters in the Louvre, and dined in public. In the 
 afternoon of the same memorable day, he proceeded to 
 a window near the gate of St. Denis, in order to see the 
 Spanish garrison march out of the city. " Commend 
 me to your master," said Henry, saluting these sullen 
 auxiliaries of the league : " depart in peace, but let us 
 never see you here again." 
 
 To subdue the provinces was an easy task after the 
 reduction of the capital. None could longer make re- 
 sistance on the plea of principle, and Henry was forward 
 to satisfy the selfishness or ambition of every noble. 
 Montmorency, who had declared for the king before his 
 conversion, was created constable : he was governor of 
 Languedoc, and his influence kept the proud duke of 
 Epernon in check. Bretagne still held out under the
 
 1594. CONQUEST OF LA ON. 363 
 
 duke of Mercosur ; but the surrender of Rouen by 
 Villars secured the important province of Normandy. 
 Villars demanded the place of admiral as the price of 
 Rouen : Henry had already bestowed this office on Bi- 
 ron, a brave young follower, the son of the late marshal. 
 Biron, impetuous and quick, but rash and fickle in 
 temper, instantly resigned ; a generous act of sacrifice 
 that he failed not speedily to regret. Henry marched 
 against Mayenne, besieged and took Laon, before which 
 town he lost the gallant Givri, who exposed himself 
 from the hopeless love which he bore to one of the 
 daughters of Guise. A letter of Henry to this young 
 noble ran in these terms : " Thy victories prevent my 
 sleeping. Adieu Givri ! Here's food for thy vanity ! " 
 
 The conquest of Laon, notwithstanding the efforts of 
 the Spaniards to relieve it, might serve as a demon- 
 stration throughout the kingdom, that the league and 
 its chief, Mayenne, possessed no longer the force to 
 resist. Picardy therefore submitted, not, however, 
 without an arrogant stipulation made on the part of 
 Amiens, that no troops should be admitted within its 
 walls. In a little time the towns of Champagne also 
 resumed their allegiance. The young duke of Guise 
 bowed the knee before his sovereign, and made a merit 
 of bringing the adhesion of the town of Rheims. 
 
 After the capture of Laon, Mayenne returned into 
 Burgundy, where he confirmed his strength by decapi- 
 tating the principal burgesses of Dijon, who meditated 
 a surrender to the king. The war also continued in 
 Provence, where Lesdiguieres, Henry's general, opposed 
 the duke of Savoy, who had aimed, during the troubles 
 of the civil war, to carve out for himself a little sove- 
 reignty from the south-east of France. Negotiations 
 continued with the pope, to whom Henry was most 
 anxious to be reconciled. The pontiff held out hopes in 
 secret, whilst he publicly maintained the most frigid 
 and insulting demeanour towards the French ambas- 
 sador. The king used every means of evincing the sin- 
 cerity of his recantation. He joined in public proces-
 
 364 HISTOnY OF FRANCE. 1 5Q5. 
 
 sions, and paid the most devout attention to the cere- 
 monies of the church. The same spirit of conciliation 
 led him to be lenient towards the Jesuits, whom the 
 university now persecuted before the parliament as the 
 abettors of regicide and assassination. They were pro- 
 tected by the quiescence of the king, who already forgave 
 the attempt made by Barrere upon his life. He had 
 reason to regret his forbearance, when in the December 
 of this year, amidst the felicitations of his court, who 
 crowded round him on his return from Picardy, a stroke 
 of a dagger was aimed at his face. It pierced his mouth, 
 and fortunately came against a tooth, which it broke. 
 The assassin was Jean Chatel, a native of Paris, and a 
 pupil of the Jesuits. He had, it seems, been an aban- 
 doned sinner, so deep in crime, that no penance could 
 be devised by his priestly confessor great enough to 
 expiate his faults, save that of slaying an heretic prince 
 with his own hand. He undertook to perform this act 
 of penitence on the person of Henry ; and, happily for 
 his country, failed. He was tortured and torn by four 
 horses, and the order of the Jesuits was expelled from 
 the kingdom. " Was it necessary," said Henry, al- 
 luding gaily to his wound, " that the Jesuits should be 
 convicted by my mouth ? " 
 
 The following year was employed by the king in 
 subduing the provinces of the south-east. He marched 
 against Mayenne, who was supported by the Spaniards, 
 under the constable of Castile. There was no regular 
 engagement, and but two skirmishes took place ; in the 
 first of which, at Fontaine Francaise, Henry fought as 
 at Aumale, with a few hundred horse against the enemy's 
 van-guard, and completely routed it. Biron had similar 
 success on another occasion, and the Spaniards were 
 driven out of France. Mayenne was about to retire to 
 Spain, when a message from the king allowed him to 
 return to Chalons, and gave assurance that the door 
 of reconciliation and pardon was yet open even to him. 
 In a short time afterwards, the pope granted full abso- 
 lution to Henry, and acknowledged him as the Most
 
 1595. DISCONTENTS OF THE HUGUENOTS. 365 
 
 Christian King. Mayenne, upon this, pretended that all 
 his scruples were removed. He made submission, and 
 received pardon ; and this stubborn chief of the league 
 proved afterwards far more faithful to Henry than the 
 huguenot comrades who had fought with him from the 
 commencement of the war. 
 
 The king was now doomed to find enemies in his 
 ancient partisans ; and it must be owned that the pro- 
 testants had some cause for discontent. All the great 
 offices and governments at the disposal of the state had 
 been distributed to the catholic leaders, as the price of 
 their submission. Not only to obtain that submission, 
 but to conciliate the pope, Henry consented to follow 
 the counsel of the catholics chiefly. He had not issued 
 to the calvinists a satisfactory guaranty of their rights ; 
 and whilst even Mayenne, the crushed and conquered 
 Mayenne, had provinces under his command, as well as 
 towns and fortresses of surety, the huguenots had still 
 to confide solely in the honour and forbearance of the 
 king. Doubtless to these just causes of complaint the 
 selfish cravings of private ambition were added. The 
 party of the reformers began in consequence to raise its 
 head, no longer in support of the king but in inde- 
 pendence of him, and manifested a kind of inert oppo- 
 sition. The chiefs of the huguenots were La Tremouille 
 and the duke de Bouillon. The latter has been known 
 to the reader, in our recital of the early part of the war, 
 as La Tour d'Auvergne viscount de Turenne. By mar- 
 rying the heiress of the de la Mark family, he inherited 
 the duchy of Bouillon, which Henry, indeed, secured to 
 him ; but, nevertheless, against which there were many 
 rival claimants to disquiet the new duke. 
 
 Owing to this discontent of the reformers, and to their 
 withholding the aid on which he always counted, Henry 
 was unable to carry on with vigour the war which he 
 had declared against Spain. The open resistance of the 
 league did not distress him so much as the neutrality of 
 the huguenots. The Spaniards, commanded by the 
 archduke Albert, took Calais, and ravaged Artois. The
 
 366 
 
 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 king applied to queen Elizabeth on this occasion, who 
 immediately demanded the restitution of Calais as the 
 price of her aid. " You must excuse me," answered 
 Henry; " I would rather be robbed by my enemies than 
 by my friends." But Elizabeth was at that time still 
 indignant on account of Henry's recantation. 
 
 Acknowledged by the pope and by the chiefs of the 
 extinct league, the king no longer feared to convoke a 
 national assembly in order to recruit his funds. It was 
 not the states-general, however, that he summoned. Both 
 Henry and his minister Sully hated the democracy, not 
 without reason, indeed, during the fanaticism of the 
 league. An assembly of notables was therefore in pre- 
 ference appointed to meet, not in Paris but at Rouen. 
 Henry, who particularly admired Francis I. amongst his 
 predecessors, showed that he entertained the peculiar 
 aristocratic feelings which we have noticed In that 
 prince * a jealousy of the higher aristocracy, but a 
 love for the class of the nobly born. In his opening 
 discourse, when mentioning his " noblesse," the king 
 added, " from which I do not distinguish the princes of 
 the realm, the quality of gentleman being the noblest 
 title we possess." This indication of royal sentiments is 
 the most important circumstance in the assembly, which 
 was productive of little effect. They voted no funds, and 
 left the government to stop the salaries of its officers, 
 in order to supply the wants of the moment. Here 
 it is a wonder that the sagacity of Sully did not perceive 
 the uselessness of an assembly of which the aristocratic 
 members feared to vote supplies for a people whom they 
 did not represent. But Sully was blinded by aristo- 
 cratic pride. The absence of the huguenot chiefs, then 
 almost in open revolt, prevented any thing like an edict 
 in their favour. 
 
 In the commencement of the following year, Philip II., 
 sinking in years, mortified by the ill success of his ma- 
 nifold schemes, and insulted by the English who had 
 taken Cadiz, one of the principal towns in his do- 
 minions, made some indirect advances towards peace.
 
 1597- HENRY INVESTS AMIENS. 367 
 
 Henry was not adverse to an accommodation ; when the 
 enterprise of a Spanish officer, named Telle, the com- 
 mander of Dourlens, who succeeded in surprising and 
 capturing the town of Amiens, put an end for the time 
 to all prospects of amicable adjustment. The king was 
 dreadfully cast down by the news, and the court was 
 struck with stupor. " I have been playing the part of 
 king of France long enough," said Henry to the fair 
 Gabrielle, for whom the love of the monarch was such 
 that it had caused his vigilance to slumber, " I must 
 now act the king of Navarre." He meant that he 
 must mount his horse, be alert, and incessantly com- 
 bating. Sully exerted himself to find the supplies ; yet, 
 notwithstanding the recent assembly of the notables, he 
 could hit on no expedient, save that of creating and 
 seUing useless offices. The parliament thought proper 
 to expostulate against this, and talked of " God having 
 confided to them the keeping of justice." " You make 
 a mistake there, sir," cried the king, interrupting the 
 president ; ' f it is to me that God has confided the 
 keeping of justice, and I entrust that keeping to you" 
 This quick and just assertion of prerogative startled de 
 Harlai. There is no feeling to be found more strongly 
 marked in the Memoirs of Sully (and the monarch no 
 doubt participated in these prejudices of his minister) 
 than the contempt felt by the noble and the soldier for 
 the lawyer, even though the latter could trace his de- 
 scent from a race of magistrates. The noblesse of the 
 robe was disdained by the noblesse of the sword ; and 
 yet Henry owed his crown as much to the firmness of 
 the one as to the valour of the other. 
 
 The king now turned all his force towards Amiens, 
 and invested it. The archduke marched to its relief, 
 but was disinclined to venture a battle. A few skir- 
 mishes, merely, took place ; and the Spaniards failing 
 to throw succours into the town, it surrendered. The 
 duke of Mayenne and the old leaguers showed their 
 sincerity on this occasion by combating in the ranks 
 of the king. Their rencontres with the Spaniards, so
 
 368 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1597- 
 
 lately their friends and allies, brought on new proposals 
 for peace. Commissioners on both sides met at Vervins 
 to arrange preliminaries. Henry took advantage of the 
 truce to lead in person an expedition against the duke 
 of Mercoeur, who still held out in the remote province 
 of Britany. The approach of the king intimidated him, 
 however : he offered to submit ; and adroitly proposing 
 to give his daughter and heiress in marriage to Henry's 
 son by Gabrielle d'Estrees, he obtained favourable 
 terms. That illegitimate son was Caesar, created duke of 
 Vendome. 
 
 On his return from thus pacifying the internal trou- 
 bles of his kingdom, Henry found his commissioners 
 partly agreed with those of Spain, as to the terms of a 
 treaty. The only obstacle was raised by his allies, the 
 queen of England and the states of Holland, as Spain 
 persisted obstinately in not acknowledging the inde- 
 pendence of the Dutch, and objected equally to a cessa- 
 tion of hostilities. The king certainly did not show 
 himself inclined to make much sacrifice or exertion for 
 these insurgents, to whose remonstrances he replied, 
 that they were very well able to defend themselves 
 without aid ; and that after so many troubles and so 
 long a war, his kingdom had such absolute need of 
 repose, that he could not sacrifice the hopes of it to any 
 foreign consideration. The treaty of Vervins was there- 
 fore concluded in May, 1598. The Spaniards restored 
 all the towns that they still held in Pi card y, Calais 
 included, whilst Henry gave up Tranche Comte and the 
 C'harolois together with Cambray. The duke of Savoy 
 was included in the accommodation ; the disputed point 
 of the marquisate of Saluces being left to the arbitra- 
 tion of the pope. 
 
 Previous to this conclusion of peace with foreign 
 countries, Henry had applied himself to remove all dis- 
 content at home, by satisfying the just desires of the 
 huguenots. On his return from Britany he received the 
 deputies of the protestants at Nantes, and consulted them 
 as to their wants and the guaranty which they desired.
 
 1598. EDICT OF NANTES. 369 
 
 Acting on their advice, tempered by his own prudence, 
 and guided by the wisdom of de Thou and other coun- 
 sellors, Henry drew up and issued the famous edict of 
 Nantes. By this the reformers were to enjoy free- 
 dom of worship in all the towns where their creed then 
 prevailed. They were allowed to have meetings of their 
 representatives, as well as to raise sums for their clergy, 
 paying at the same time the tithe due to the established 
 church. In suits -at law their judges were to be half 
 catholic half protestant ; and several towns of surety 
 were left to them for a certain time. The parliament 
 made considerable opposition to the registering of this 
 edict ; and the king was obliged to use menaces as well 
 as persuasion to overcome their obstinacy. 
 
 Having thus established his throne, and by an admir- 
 able mixture of firmness and conciliation silenced the 
 two contending parties, or at least left them no pretext 
 for troubling the repose of the state, Henry apph'ed 
 himself to regulate the internal administration of the 
 kingdom. All indeed was not as he wished. He had 
 been compelled to parcel out the provinces among the 
 high aristocracy, of whose fidelity he could be ill assured. 
 To break faith with them was neither advisable nor 
 practicable ; and therefore his efforts were employed in 
 husbanding his resources and ordering his revenues, 
 that these sinews of war might not be wanting at need. 
 The baron de Rosny, better known as the minister Sully, 
 was created sur-intendant of finance. The old jobbers 
 and administrators of the revenue ridiculed the idea of 
 thrusting a soldier into such an office ; but Sully soon 
 convinced the monarch and the nation that probity, 
 economy, and activity, were qualities more efficient in 
 a financier than all the arts of fiscal experience. His 
 first operation was to remit all arrears due on the taille ; 
 his next was to annul the leases for farming out the 
 revenue, and to order all pensions or other allowances to 
 be paid direct from the treasury, whence all payments 
 were to be made, and not as heretofore from different 
 funds and provinces. Great clamours of course were 
 
 VOL. I. B B
 
 S70 HISTORY OF FRANCE. -1599- 
 
 raised against these innovations, so unfavourable to the 
 grandees and to the provincial authorities. The proud 
 duke of Epernon insulted Sully, who was not slow to 
 touch his sword. " If Epernon challenges you/* wrote 
 Henri Quatre to his minister, " I will be your second." 
 
 The debts of the state were found to amount to up- 
 wards of 300 millions of livres, tantamount to nearly 
 three times that sum in the present day, and this at the 
 enormous interest of ten or twelve per cent. The re- 
 venue to liquidate this and support the charges of the 
 state did not exceed 25 millions. Yet Sully in five or 
 six years had cancelled this debt, and had begun to 
 amass funds in anticipation of a future war. Not only 
 was this effected, but in a very short time he relieved the 
 people from the onerous tax of the sous per livre on all 
 goods sold. Sully was eminently aristocratic ; so much 
 so, that he vehemently opposed the introduction of those 
 manufactures which enriched the civic class at the ex- 
 pense of the landholders. Henry, however, over-ruled his 
 minister in this, and founded the silk manufacture of 
 the kingdom as well as that of tapestry. Yet Sully, 
 though he despised the lower orders, did his utmost to 
 alleviate their burdens. He diminished the faille, or 
 tax, from which the nobles were exempt, and preferred 
 the dixme royal, a kind of capitation tax, which was 
 more equitably levied. The monarchy, in fact, never 
 flourished under a more sage or more upright minister ; 
 and yet this administrative virtue of Sully gave a greater 
 blow to the liberties of the French people than even the 
 astute despotism of Richelieu. The economy of Sully 
 rendered the states-general and even the notables useless ; 
 and all hopes vanished that the late troubles would ter- 
 minate to the advantage of national freedom. 
 
 Who has not heard of the fair Gabrielle ? Henry 
 saw her first at the chateau of her father, during one 
 of his campaigns, and became enamoured. He fre- 
 quently stole from his camp in disguise, and crossed the 
 enemy's lines to visit her. An hundred stories are told 
 of the romantic adventures he underwent whilst wooing.
 
 1599- THE FAIR GABRIELLE. 3?1 
 
 He won, and was happy. Never had illegitimate love 
 a more flattering excuse. Compelled to espouse, when 
 a boy, the abandoned sister of Charles IX., his wedding 
 feast had been stained with the blocd of his friend, and 
 the dissolute Margaret led a life such as might be ex- 
 pected from such a race and such espousals. Henry 
 consoled himself in the affections of Gabrielle d'Estrees, 
 whose society he loved, and to whom he was constant. 
 She had borne him several children. And now the wish 
 of Henry was to obtain a divorce from his queen, and 
 to sanction his connection with Gabrielle by a marriage. 
 So serious and sincere was he in this that all his cour- 
 tiers applauded the determination. Sully alone looked 
 cold. Henry consulted him, and besought his advice ; 
 and the minister represented to him all the dangers of 
 a disputed succession, of the pretensions of the young 
 duke of Vendome, who could not be legitimated, and of 
 all the obvious objections to such a step. Henry was 
 grieved : he saw the justice of the counsel, and remained 
 irresolute. Gabrielle broke forth in invectives against 
 Sully, and at length demanded his dismissal. Henry 
 brought his minister by the hand into the apartment of 
 Gabrielle, and entreated her to be reconciled to him. 
 She persisted in her pride and in bursts of resentment. 
 " Know, madam," said Henry, harsh for the first time, 
 " that a minister like him must be dearer to me than 
 even such a mistress as you." Gabrielle henceforth gave 
 herself up to grief. The king was true and kind as 
 ever. In the spring of the year J 599 she was advanced 
 in a state of pregnancy. Henry, about to go through 
 the pious ceremonies of Easter at Fontainebleau, felt it 
 decorous to separate for a few days from his mistress. 
 She retired to Paris, weighed down by despondency and 
 the blackest presentiment. Astrological predictions were 
 then the mode ; and some imprudent or malevolent 
 information of this kind tormented her: " We shall never 
 meet again," were her words on parting from the king, 
 and they proved true. She was taken with convulsions, 
 delivered of a dead child, and expired in a few hours. 
 
 B B 2 '
 
 372 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 1599- 
 
 Henry had mounted on horseback at the first news, and 
 was half way on the road to Paris, when he was told 
 " it was too late." The brave Henry could not sup- 
 port this blow : he well nigh fainted, and was obliged 
 to be conveyed back to Fontainebleau. There he re- 
 tired, and shut himself up to indulge his grief. Sully 
 alone was able to console him, and rouse him, after a 
 time, to the affairs of the kingdom.* 
 
 It were to be wished, for Henry's character, that his 
 amours had ended here. His intention was to marry ; 
 and the niece of the grand duke of Tuscany, Mary of 
 Medicis, had already been mentioned. But the divorce 
 had not yet been expedited by the pope ; and the in- 
 flammable temperament of Henry took fire in the mean 
 time with a new passion. Mademoiselle d'Antraigues 
 was the object, a being lovely indeed, but wanting alike 
 the modesty, the sweet temper, and unambitious conduct 
 of Gabrielle. She long enticed and tormented the mo- 
 march. Her father, the count d'Antraigues, affected 
 resentment and vigilance ; and Henry how the old love 
 to live their youth o'er again ! had recourse to such dis- 
 guise as he had formerly used to gain admission to Ga- 
 brielle d'Estrees. Henrietta d'Antraigues had not the 
 same taste : she is said to have so disliked the monarch 
 in the humble dress of a gardener that she turned him 
 from her presence. At length she obtained from Henry 
 a promise of marriage in case that a son was born to 
 her within the year, and Mademoiselle d'Antraigues be- 
 came marquise de Verneuil. Henry showed the contract 
 to Sully, who, without other comment, tore and cast it 
 under his feet. The king felt bound to write another ; 
 but in consequence of a stroke of lightning which fell 
 on the house where the marquise resided it ultimately 
 became void. The fright which the lightning occasi- 
 oned had the effect of destroying the hopes she had 
 entertained of fulfilling her part of the contract, a sti- 
 pulation indecent and unworthy of the monarch. Henry 
 
 * The memory of Henry IV. 'a mistress is preserved in the song of " Char- 
 mante Gabrielle," which her royal lover himself composed for her.
 
 iGOO. HENBY ESPOUSES MARY OF MEDICIS. 373 
 
 soon after was roused to a fuller sense of his dignity 
 and of the nation's weal. A divorce was by this time 
 obtained ; and he espoused Mary of Medicis in the 
 course of the year 1600. The king describes her in one 
 of his letters to Sully as " terribly robust and healthy." 
 She had some reason to be jealous, for the marquise de 
 Verneuil still retained a share of influence. Sully was 
 more than once called in to quiet their domestic broils. 
 The birth of a son, afterwards Louis XIII., soon oc- 
 curred to allay the fears of a disputed succession, and 
 also contributed to bind Henry to his queen. The 
 Spanish ambassador, a grave Castilian, was once ushered 
 into the king's presence at Fontainebleau rather ab- 
 ruptly, and found the monarch running on all fours 
 with the little dauphin on his back. " Are you a father? " 
 was Henry's first salutation to the diplomatist. " Yes, 
 sire." " Then I may finish my play ; " and Henry took 
 another scamper with his son around the apartment. 
 
 The chief obstacle to the security and happiness of 
 the monarch lay in the intrigues of his grandees. The 
 people gave him little trouble ; the turbulence of the 
 civic class was over : they were ashamed, as well as 
 weary, of the long disorders of the league, and in no 
 way sought to renew them. Satisfied by the mild and 
 economical management of the revenue by Sully, they 
 applauded so beneficent a power, and forgot, or regretted 
 not, that it was absolute. None clamoured for the states- 
 general ; they made loyalty a part of their religion ; and 
 abandoned all doctrines of liberty and republicanism to 
 the hated huguenots, who professed them. 
 
 The nobles, who were the contemporaries of Henry, 
 could not find the same repose : they had lived a life of 
 turbulence and war ; they had been bred in intrigue, 
 and in all the excitement of contending parties ; peace 
 could not content them. Then the life of a camp had 
 placed them on a kind of equality with their monarch, 
 who had terminated the war by yielding up the ad- 
 ministering authority in the provinces to the several 
 grandees. He had compounded with them, as much as 
 
 BBS
 
 374 HISTORY OF FflANCE. 1601. 
 
 conquered them ; and the protestant nobles had taken 
 a position of equal independence with that of the ca- 
 tholics. The high aristocracy, in fact, that Francis I. 
 so prudently kept down, had reconstituted itself in the 
 subsequent reigns. They now made a covert, but not 
 less serious proposal to Henry, choosing the duke of 
 Montpensier, a stripling and a prince of the blood, to 
 be their spokesman on the occasion. This demand was 
 no less than to re-establish the old feudal system, by al- 
 lowing the present governors of provinces to hold them 
 in fief, and transmit them to their descendants. Henry 
 was not a monarch to tolerate such a demand ; and his 
 angry reply struck young Montpensier with terror. 
 
 The grandees determined to win by union and force 
 what gentler means could not obtain. They conspired, 
 leagued with Spain, with the duke of Savoy, and eveto 
 with England, endeavouring to excite a malcontent party. 
 Protestants as well as catholics joined in this : the duke 
 of Bouillon at the head of one, the proud Epernon re- 
 presenting the other. Such, however, was Henry's 
 power, and such his character for courage as well as 
 promptitude, such, too, was the vigilance of Sully, that 
 this intrigue could never be matured into a conspiracy. 
 Henry's frank and amiable temper won over many ; and 
 he never proceeded to punish the guilty until he had 
 used every gentle means to admonish, to pardon, and 
 recall them to duty. 
 
 The mareschal de Biron was almost the only one of 
 his nobles who still persisted in treasonable views. The 
 king, on one occasion, had summoned him, charged him 
 seriously, but not severely, with the crime, and showed 
 him that he was well informed of his intrigues. Biron 
 fell on his knees, confessed his weakness, but vowed that 
 he would never more forsake the path of loyalty. Henry 
 pardoned and embraced him. But Biron, vain and fickle, 
 jealous even of his monarch's fame, was weak enough to 
 listen once more to the insinuations of Spain. The 
 duke of Savoy, on a visit to Henry, manifested every 
 sign of admiration for die king, while he occupied himself
 
 1601. TREASON OF BIRON. S75 
 
 in corrupting the French courtiers, and in fomenting a 
 party. He was ably seconded by the Spanish count de 
 Fuentes. Biron was fascinated by the mighty promises 
 of these intriguers : he was to have Burgundy as an in- 
 dependent s'tate. The constable Bourbon himself never 
 received more magnificent promises. Nothing more 
 displays the baseness and declension of Spain, than her 
 recourse to such weak and dishonourable machinations. 
 Henry soon after, wearied with the bad faith and subtle 
 subterfuges of the duke of Savoy, made war on that 
 prince. Biron was entrusted with the command, and 
 in conducting it his treachery became manifest. One 
 day, when Sully rode with him to view the siege of a 
 fortress belonging to the duke, the former could perceive 
 that the fire from the ramparts slackened, and was di- 
 rected from them. Sully took the same ride alone on 
 the following day, and was received with a heavy and 
 well-directed cannonade. It afterwards appeared that 
 the marshal had intended to entice the king into an am- 
 buscade, where the fire of the enemy would have cer- 
 tainly proved fatal. The duke of Savoy, worsted by 
 the arms of Henry, made his submission, and obtained 
 peace. Biron continued his intrigues with Spain, in 
 concert with the duke of Bouillon, with the count 
 d'Auvergne, bastard of Charles IX., and probably with 
 Epernon, and the whole body of the malcontent no- 
 blesse. 
 
 The king was perfectly aware of these intrigues. 
 Biron was betrayed by his chief counsellor and insti- 
 gator, a person named Lafin. Henry saw Biron once 
 talking with Lafin, and warned him, saying, " I know 
 that man ; he will lead you into evil." But the marshal 
 was deaf to advice. Henry did not at first place much 
 credit in the revelations of Lafin, who accused Sully him- 
 self among others of the court. But the informer pro- 
 duced written documents, proofs of Biron's connection 
 with Spain. Biron was summoned to court. It was 
 the king's intention to reproach his ancient comrade, to 
 endeavour to awaken his loyalty, shame him into a con- 
 
 B B 4
 
 376 HISTORY OF FHAXCK. l60I. 
 
 fession of his treason, and again pardon him. Sully 
 received instructions to pursue the same conduct, and to 
 try every means short of letting the marshal know that 
 Latin had confessed ah 1 . Biron and the count d'Au- 
 vergne came to court boldly. Henry drew the traitor 
 apart, led him into familiar conversation, showed him- 
 self open, frank, forgiving, yet suspicious. Biron be- 
 trayed no misgivings, no repentance, no wish to remove 
 his sovereign's distrust. At last, as they arrived before 
 an equestrian statue of Henry lately erected, which was 
 ornamented with trophies, the king asked, " What would 
 the king of Spain say were he to see me thus ? " Biron, 
 who felt that this was meant to try him, insolently re- 
 plied, " Sire, he scarcely fears you." Then correcting 
 himself, he stammered out, " I mean in that statue, not 
 in this, your person." Henry smiled sorrowfully, and 
 gave up his merciful and friendly purpose. Sully, on 
 his side, exerted himself to the same effect, but in vain. 
 Biron was hardened. It was only then that Henry gave 
 orders for his arrest, and that of the count d'Auvergne. 
 As they left the king's chamber, their swords were de- 
 manded. They were conveyed by water to the arsenal. 
 Biron was tried before the parliament, condemned,, and 
 executed. He evinced the greatest rage on the scaffold : 
 it amounted to frenzy, and was excited by his horror of 
 so disgraceful a death. The executioner was obliged to 
 hide his sword, and strike off the head of the culprit 
 unawares. 
 
 The last years of Henry's reign are scarcely marked 
 by any important incidents. The few that did take place, 
 such as the conspiracy of the family d'Antraigues, and 
 the weaknesses into which Henry's amorous disposition 
 led him, are exaggerated in importance, and narrated by 
 historians with a detail they little merit. The punish- 
 ment of Biron, which Henry meant as a warning to his 
 discontented nobles, succeeded in keeping them in awe. 
 If they intrigued, it was in fear, and with a caution that 
 marred all progress or purpose. The count d'Auvergne 
 alone, though pardoned for being implicated with Biron,
 
 1609- INTRIGUES OF THE COURT. 377 
 
 renewed his schemes in conjunction with the marquise 
 de Verneuil : this mistress treated the king with the 
 capriciousness and severity which a wronged beauty 
 might use towards a gallant more advanced in years : 
 the monarch construed her caprice into infidelity; and a 
 loving quarrel grew to be a serious misunderstanding. 
 Henry withdrew the written document of the promise 
 of marriage. The father and daughter, joined by the 
 count d'Auvergne, plotted against the king, it was said 
 against his life ; and, as usual, they found support in a 
 Spanish emissary. They were all three arrested, tried, 
 and condemned to death ; but Henry pardoned his mis- 
 tress, as well as her relatives, and commuted their punish- 
 ment into exile. The restless and false d'Auvergne 
 was confined permanently in the Bastille. 
 
 Squabbles with his queen, Mary of Medicis, on ac- 
 count of her Italian favourites, Concini and his wife; 
 distrust of Sully, excited by the envious courtiers ; these, 
 with national improvements, negotiations, festivals, and 
 hunting parties, bring the reign of Henry IV. nearly to 
 its close. In l6'09, its happy and glorious monotony 
 was varied by the enthusiastic admiration which the 
 aged monarch conceived for mademoiselle de Mont- 
 morency, the young and lovely daughter of the constable, 
 who had just appeared at court, and eclipsed all its 
 beauties. There is some difference of opinion as to the 
 nature of Henry's admiration : the memoir writers of 
 the age saw scandal in every connection ; and certainly 
 Henry's past life and his known failings incline to the 
 worst side. Bassompierre, then a young man, relates that 
 he himself became a suitor for the beauty's hand, and that 
 he was induced by the entreaties or commands of the 
 enamoured king to desist. Bassompierre was a babbler, 
 however, whose vanity breaks out in the arrogance of the 
 mere pretension. The young prince of Conde was also 
 smitten, but shrunk back from so formidable a rival as the 
 monarch. What belies the account of Bassompierre 
 is, that Henry came forward, and assured Conde, " that 
 he might woo in all confidence, and that he had nothing
 
 378 HISTORY OP FRANCE. 
 
 to fear on that score from his king." If Henry had 
 licentious views, Bassompierre, and not Conde, would 
 have been the convenient husband of mademoiselle de 
 Montmorency. 
 
 Conde was the successful suitor, and the marriage 
 was celebrated at court with unusual splendour. Henry, 
 having given his word to the prince, indulged his pre- 
 dilection for the lovely bride by showering presents and 
 favours upon her and her husband. The court, full of 
 the malevolent, amongst whom the followers of the 
 jealous queen were not the least forward, construed all 
 these symptoms to be the homage of a guilty passion : 
 they poured this in the prince's ear ; and Conde, alarmed 
 for his wife's honour, carried her off from the court by 
 stealth, first to Picardy, whence, on receiving a summons 
 from the king to return, he made a second flight, and 
 gained the Low Countries. The king showed himself 
 strangely affected by this incident : the discovery of 
 Biron's conspiracy did not cause him more trouble. 
 Sully was called up in the night ; and the whole court was 
 roused by the agitation of the monarch, who was pacing 
 and stamping up and down the chamber of the queen, 
 while the courtiers stood " pasted to the walls," says 
 Sully, lest they should interrupt the monarch's passion. 
 The flight of the first prince of the blood, and his 
 taking refuge with the Spaniards, was certainly a grave 
 question, love and jealousy being set aside. The king 
 demanded Sully's advice, who hesitated, but being forced, 
 advised him to "do nothing." " Nothing!" said Henry, 
 " call you that advice ? " Sully replied, that the escape 
 of the prince was a matter of little importance, unless 
 the king chose to make it important by raising a clamour, 
 and showing that he took an interest concerning it. 
 Henry, however, was not in a humour to treat the 
 matter thus slightly and thus wisely : he instructed his 
 ambassador to demand of the archduke to deliver up 
 the prince and princess of Conde ; and, as Sully fore- 
 saw, the court of Brussels, in refusing, filled Europe 
 with calumnies against Henry; asserting that he wanted
 
 l609- PREPARATIONS FOR WAR. 3?9 
 
 to take by force the wife of the first prince of the realm 
 and of the blood. When Henry, immediately after- 
 wards, menaced war, the outcry was that Europe was 
 about to be deluged in blood for another Helen. 
 
 It was, indeed, unfortunate, that Henry, who had 
 remained so many years at peace, no doubt preparing 
 and amassing the materials and resources of war, and 
 cautiously awaiting fit pretext and proper season, should 
 now draw the sword for a cause at once criminal and 
 absurd. To reduce the power of the house of Austria 
 was part of an universal scheme, long meditated by 
 Henry, and concerted by him with the politic Elizabeth. 
 This scheme, which was to parcel Europe out into 
 divers states, equal in extent and balanced in strength, 
 to be afterwards held together by a general congress, or 
 Amphictyonic council, existed more in the fancy than 
 in the intentions of the French monarch. It had slum- 
 bered, but now started into life. He resolved to realise 
 his dream: but this, which had been a vision of heroism 
 and philanthropy, was now degraded and sullied by the 
 immediate motive. Henry, who was passionately fond of 
 glory, saw the stain that was to rob his achievements of 
 their brightness and purity. The accusation of the Spa- 
 niards troubled him : perhaps there was even truth in the 
 reproach, that the love of a sexagenarian king for a 
 princess, and a married princess of twenty, was the 
 only cause and pretext for convulsing Europe and shed- 
 ding its best blood. This weighed upon Henry, and 
 fretted him : his gaiety disappeared. Remorse and 
 mortification came to cloud the heaven of his declining 
 days. A dark presentiment, similar to that which had 
 forewarned his loved Gabrielle of her fate, now gathered 
 around Henry : he could not shake it off. 
 
 He intended leaving the queen as regent during his 
 absence at the head of his army ; and her previous co- 
 ronation, a ceremony that had not yet taken place, was 
 considered requisite. This detained him in the capital ; 
 and Mary of Medicis, fond of state and ceremony, in- 
 sisted on it, and delighted in it. Henry was annoyed
 
 380 HISTORY OF FRANCE. . l6lO. 
 
 and fretted : he frequently said he should never leave 
 Paris alive, and he longed to contradict his presentiment. 
 The coronation of the queen at length took place. On 
 the following day, the 14th of May, ifilO, he manifested 
 strong feelings of despondency. Despatches brought 
 him word that his enemies were making no preparations 
 for defence, and that they gave out that the delivery of 
 the prince and princess of Conde would at once allay 
 his choler and arrest his schemes. This increased his 
 ill humour : he called for Sully ; but learning that his 
 minister was ill at the arsenal, the king's coach was 
 ordered to convey him thither. Seven of the suite oc- 
 cupied with the king his ample carriage. The duke of 
 Epernon was in one corner, and Henry next to him. 
 The vehicle proceeded, but was stopped in the narrow 
 rue de la Ferronnerie by two loaded carts. This was 
 the moment chosen by an assassin, Ravaillac, who, 
 mounting on the step, and leaning full into the carriage, 
 struck the king with a poniard, first in the stomach, 
 and then in the breast. One of these stabs pierced the 
 heart of the noble Henry. 
 
 To paint the rage and despair of the people would be 
 impossible. The once detested Henry had won every 
 heart ; and the general grief for him partook of the 
 character of madness. Tears were the least tokens of 
 sorrow ; many died on learning the_catastrophe, amongst 
 others the brave De Vic, the comrade of Henry. The 
 lifeless body was borne to the Louvre, whilst Ravaillac, 
 who made no attempt to escape, was taken, brandishing 
 his dagger, and only preserved by the guards from being 
 instantly torn in pieces. He had been a monk, strongly 
 imbued with the king-killing principles that the Jesuits 
 had broached. His crime had been long meditated by 
 him ; but no proof exists that he had been instigated 
 either by Spain or by any knot of malcontent courtiers. 
 Suspicion, indeed, has scattered its stain on all with an 
 unsparing hand. Epernon, the queen, Concini, and 
 many others, were accused as being privy to the deed ; 
 and die record of Ravaillac's trial having been destroyed,
 
 lOlO. CHARACTER OF HENRY IV. 381 
 
 whilst these personages possessed the chief influence, 
 gives some colour to the charge. But the tortured cul- 
 prit might idly or malevolently cast imputation on the 
 powerful, as indeed he menaced to do. For when some 
 one pressed him to name his accomplices, Ravaillac an- 
 swered, " Suppose I name you." The seed of his crime 
 was the diabolical maxim to which the fanaticism of the 
 league had given birth, and which it had rendered po- 
 pular. It had germinated and grown in the dark soli- 
 tude of a rancorous and fanatic spirit. 
 
 The character of Henry, if not altogether the most 
 perfect, is certainly the most interesting that history 
 presents. To enumerate his qualities were to repeat all 
 that we admire in the perfection of the modern gentle- 
 man. Such was he, another Francis I., with more good 
 fortune, more military talent, more humanity, more re- 
 finement, and with a career far more calculated than 
 that of Francis to illustrate the heroic virtues. Then 
 the interior and domestic life of Henry, made known to 
 us in the simple and sublime memorials of Sully, makes 
 us intimate with the man as with the monarch, and 
 endears him to us as the warm friend, the devoted lover, 
 the generous master, the frank and witty companion. 
 His contemporaries, who gave him the epithet of the 
 Great, must have admired, even more than they loved 
 him. In our days, when the warlike feats of the past 
 have been thrown so much into the shade, we are in- 
 clined to reverse those feelings, and to love more than 
 to admire him. 
 
 Henry was no tyrant ; but his reign had certainly a 
 despotic tendency. He summoned no assembly of the 
 states where the tiers etat had a voice ; but his position, 
 much more than his nature, influenced him in that line 
 of policy. He had suffered much from popular violence: 
 he had had experience of the fury of the sixteen, and 
 the fanaticism of the mob hired by the money of Spain. 
 It is not to be expected, that from remote or theoretic 
 views of the public good he should have awakened and 
 given life to this hydra. Besides, even in the plenitude
 
 382 HISTORY OF FRANCE. l6lO. 
 
 of his power, he was harassed by the insubordination 
 of the protestant towns and the assemblies of the re- 
 formers. The wish of all good men was for peace and 
 order. The license of the past had thrown into dis- 
 grace the very name of liberty, whose lasting victories 
 can be won only under the banners of moderation. 
 To judge Henry or his age then with our ideas would 
 be absurd ; as to condemn him because the circum- 
 stances of his reign were unfavourable to the public 
 liberties is unjust. 
 
 Aristocratic as Henry was in feeling, he was still less 
 so than his minister Sully, many of whose prejudices in 
 this respect he over-ruled. But the exclusive maxim of 
 gentility nevertheless prevailed. The civic class trodden 
 down in this reign were for nearly two centuries unable 
 to rise. The cause of this depression may be traced to 
 their want of union and firmness, and notwithstanding 
 the majority of the capital adhered to Catholicism : we 
 must also take into account the blindness with which 
 both parties, choosing princes for their leaders, allowed all 
 public and general principle to be forgotten and lost in 
 the private interests and views of those chiefs. 
 
 END OF THE FIRST VOLUME.. 
 
 LONDON : 
 
 Printed by A. & R. Spottiswoode, 
 N ew-Street- Square.
 
 CABINET OF HISTORY. 
 
 CONDUCTED BY THE 
 
 REV. DIONYSIUS LARDNER, LL.I>. F.R.S. L. & E. 
 
 M.R.I.A. F.L.S. F.Z.S. HoaF.C.P.S. M.AstS. &c. &c. 
 
 ASSISTED BY 
 
 EMINENT LITERARY MEN. 
 
 THE 
 
 HISTORY OF FRANCE. 
 
 BY 
 
 EYRE EVANS CROWE. 
 VOL. I. 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 rnt\TEi> FOR 
 LONGMAN, REES, OKME, BROWN, AND GREEN, 
 
 PATERNOSTER-ROW ; 
 
 AND JOHN TAYLOR, 
 
 UPPER OOWER STREET. 
 
 1830.
 
 Lovnov : 
 
 Printed by A. & R. Spottiswoodc, 
 New-Street- Square.
 
 ^EUNIVERy/A 
 
 &v JS*& 
 
 ij 
 
 O uL 
 ?3 O