FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS A PATRICIAN OF THE PAST FANCIES FASHIONS AND FADS RALPH NEVILL AUTHOR OF "THE MERRY PAST," "LONDON CLUBS," ETC. EDITOR OF " UNDER FIVE REIGNS " WITH A FRONTISPIECE NEW YORK BRENTANO'S CONTENTS PAGE I. SOCIETY . i II. POLITICS ...... 28 III. BOHEMIA . . . . . .57 IV. RESTAURANTS .... 92 V. PARIS . . . . . . -123 VI. ART, YESTERDAY AND TO-DAY . . .160 VII. FASHION 189 VIII. UNIFORMS OLD AND NEW . . . 212 IX. FADS 248 X. DEMOCRACY . . . .277 INDEX . . . . . . - 305 2055792 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS SOCIETY NOTHING in this world is entirely new: the generations of men as they glide along like the waves of a rapid stream resemble each other far more than is generally conceived. Making allowances for the different conditions of various epochs, the sum total of vice and virtue, joy and sorrow, remains about the same. Of late we have been surfeited with plaints as to the sins and shortcomings of the wealthier classes and the frivolity of London Society. In all proba- bility it is not a bit worse or better than in the past : its sense of dignity, however, has completely disappeared. " The two chief characteristics of London Society are its simplicity and heartlessness. It is amused with marvellous ease. The smallest of practical jokes is enough to set it in a roar. The slightest eccentricity of demeanour plunges it in a paroxysm of laughter. Gossip that is perfectly puerile delights it. Any trivial scandal, the tale of which is told with- 2 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS out point, epigram, or even antithesis, is welcomed as the best thing in the world. In Paris a certain flavour of wit or humour is expected. There is no necessity of anything of the kind in London. These grown-up men and women, who laugh at the recital of imbecilities and ineptitudes, are as easily enter- tained as children. Like children, too, they love to parade their own vices, and to make themselves out a thousand times more wicked than they are. No society could exist if it was half as corrupt as the members of London Society, to judge from their casual talk, or from the significance which their comments and illusions are intended to convey. But it is talk only the lax garrulity of a race which is still laboriously endeavouring to emancipate itself from the fetters of Puritanism." This view of Society, it should be added, was not written yesterday, but in 1885; and the people criticized are those who now deplore the frivolity of the present generation. If the critic had pointed out how the Upper Classes were letting their tra- ditional power slip from their grasp, he would have been doing them a greater service, for, though at the date in question, " Society," in the old meaning of the word, was already well on the down-grade, it still played a very considerable part in ruling England. Many of its members, it is true, were unthinking and frivolous, but there were quite a number of serious and high-minded men and women who drew a hard-and-fast line against many things which are freely tolerated to-day. "MON MONDE" 3 Money, though thoroughly appreciated, did not command the power which it at present enjoys ; besides, people were rather particular how it had been got, or, at least, pretended to be so a great difference this from the present state of affairs of seeing " no filthiness in any lucre." Millionaires were not allowed to ride rough-shod over others by reason of their wealth ; indeed, many of them were merely tolerated, like " Louis Quatorze " a nickname conferred upon a certain rich alien, whose Christian name was Louis, because he was never asked to dinner except when an extra guest was required to prevent the party being thirteen. To-day, at least among that ridiculous section known as the " Smart Set," millionaires of no matter what race are indisputably lords paramount by right of superabundant cash. The days indeed have gone when any attempt at arrogance on the part of men or women of Semitic extraction was sternly and promptly repressed. " I am sorry I cannot send Mr. X an invitation to my party," wrote a wealthy heiress of Hebrew parent- age to one of her husband's relatives who had asked for a card for a friend. "As you must realize, he is not of mon monde" 11 1 agree with you about Mr. X not being of your monde" came the reply ; "his father was not a Jew banker, but only an English gentleman of ancient family." The late King Edward, who regarded the best class of Hebrews with conspicuous favour, first assured 4 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS them the social consideration they now enjoy. In that, as in other matters, he set a fashion which has had far-reaching social effects. To-day, numbers of people, whose ancestors would not have sat down at the same table with anyone of Semitic lineage, bow the knee before the descendants of the tribes. English Society, indeed, is now dominated by a plutocracy to a considerable extent Hebraic in its composition. Though no sensible individual can approve of attempts to arouse racial hatred or view Anti-Semitism with anything but disgust, there is no doubt but that something akin to an Oriental social domination is half on its way to being brought about in modern England. I doubt, however, whether our conquerors are entirely at their ease. Though great wealth may bring influence and power, it brings also care and apprehension. The Colchian ram with the golden fleece, though furnished with wings, was probably in constant fear of getting sheared. More breezy and irresponsible are the wealthy Americans who make England their playground. These happily appear to have little effect upon our national life. American ideas do not seem easily to acclimatize themselves on British soil. Not- withstanding our close connexion with the United States, expressions or words only with great difficulty become part of our daily speech. " Swank," an expressive adjective most appro- THE MODERN HEAVEN 5 priately of pure transatlantic origin, has gained a speedy popularity at least among the masses, but other anglicized American words are comparatively rare. Railroad, of course, shares an almost equal popu- larity with our own railway, which, nevertheless, is unquestionably more fitting and expressive, as well as more euphonious. Telegram, a Greek compound which cannot grammatically be justified, is another American invention which has gained a permanent foothold. Though on the whole our friends from across the Atlantic have not affected the habits of the people at large, they have certainly done a good deal to alter our aristocracy, a considerable portion of which has unconsciously assimilated various American ways and notions. In addition to this, quite a number of our younger peers are of semi-American origin. If, as Carlyle said, the modern hell is the hell of not making money, the making of money to an unlimited extent is certainly the modern Yankee heaven. Not unnaturally, many exposed to wealthy transatlantic influences are dominated by the same idea. Americans, like the representatives of the Hebrew race, also largely benefited by the affability of the late King, who had a particular liking for visitors from across the Atlantic, especially if they were rich or beautiful. Many of the latter, having married into the peerage, have become more or less English, but nevertheless they generally keep in touch with their countrymen and women. They are, however, prone 6 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS to become jealous of any new arrivals who contrive to achieve a like social success. Marriages between Englishmen of good family and wealthy heiresses from the States have of late years been so frequent that a large number of old families are now connected by ties of blood with the great millionaire-producing country across the Atlantic. An American plutocrat, of no matter what origin, has now come to look upon the purchase of an English peer for his daughter as a perfectly natural appanage of great wealth. The difficulty with mothers and fathers of good-looking daughters with plenty of dollars is not to get a peer but to get a good one. Wise parents, it is understood, keep a list of eligible young noblemen, and, as a handy American guide now gives a full account of those best suited for marriage- able purposes, there is really no excuse for mistakes. A plan likely to yield good results is to keep two or three strings on the bow, thus if one aristocratic bridegroom fails another can be at once secured. Meanwhile an intermediary in England is instructed to see how things are going, and, if necessary, pack off eligible suitors to any given point. This system was not very long ago employed in the most efficient manner possible. The mother of a very wealthy American young lady had for some time hesitated whether her daughter should marry a rather dissipated foreign grandee or a thoroughly impe- cunious but quiet and gentlemanlike English peer, absolutely warranted to give no trouble. Owing to unsatisfactory reports concerning the A GOOD BARGAIN 7 foreign grandee, choice ultimately fell upon the English peer. A telegraphic summons " Grandee off, send along peer " dispatched to an accommo- dating English friend caused the jubilant nobleman to sail for America at a day's notice. He is now married, and in every way has turned out a most satisfactory bargain. Such a transaction as this could not have occurred in former days. The old English aristocrat always chose ; rarely did he consent to be chosen. While the system of re-establishing the family fortunes by tacitly consenting to be purchased by American dollars has saved a few estates, it is undoubtedly a proof that the English aristocracy has degenerated in character and backbone, the pitiful ideal of a considerable section of it being " What does anything matter as long as I have a good time ? " Attached though one may be to the idea of a dominant aristocracy, it is impossible to be enthusiastic about many of its modern repre- sentatives "Who have mildewed in their thousands doing nothing. . . . Why, the greater their disgrace ! Fall back not upon a name ! Rest, rot in that ! Not keep it noble, make it noble ! Fools, With such a vantage-ground for nobleness ! " Born into an age when an alert mentality counts as it never counted before, the vast majority entirely fail to grasp the situation, and are content, notwithstanding the considerable advantages which 8 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS their position still gives them, to allow the reins of power, on which their caste formerly kept such a firm hold, to slip completely from their grasp. I do not know that, even from a physical stand- point, they are as a class as well developed as their predecessors, who, of course, lived more in the country and spent more time in the open air. Not that the aristocracy or Smart Society of to-day despises sport ; on the contrary, not a few devote their whole lives to one form of it or another, frequently to the entire exclusion of far more important interests which they have the colossal folly to declare merely " bore them " ! It may be taken as a more or less general rule that people who are always talking about being bored should be classed among what Nietzsche called "slave people." Individuals of this type, consumed by dread of ennui and a desire to kill time, are not really fitted to be entrusted with the priceless boon of leisure at all, nature having only fitted them to be hewers of wood and drawers of water. Those who declare that they find the day too long invite ill-luck. A sort of strange fatality seems to be attached to persons who fail to appre- ciate the gifts of fortune. Many who complain that time hangs heavy on their hands are unable to find enough of it to take the most ordinary care of their own affairs, the consequence being that in the end they contrive to outlive their characters, their constitutions, and their properties. Living always in the same kind of world makes MILDEWED BRAINS 9 certain individuals as unfit for living out of it as always living out of it does for living in it, all sense of proportion being annihilated. Idlers who mix only with other idlers ready to agree with them become more and more fixed in their admiration for certain ideals of a petty and unimportant nature, while attaching little importance to the things which really matter. I myself have heard an owner of a large landed estate, who ought to have known better, hold up as an ideal to his little son (whose natural bent did not appear to me to lie in the direction of sport) " the making of the biggest bag of partridges on record." Considering the conditions under which modern shooting is conducted, he might just as well have pointed out to him the glory of going to Chicago and converting pigs into sausages quicker than it had ever been done before. Like the majority of his class, this thoughtless father entirely failed to realize the tendencies of the age. Endowed with very fair brains, unlimited leisure, and ample wealth, he was, as it were, content to mildew away. Had he chosen to adopt a public career, and if he had anything worth saying, full publicity was at his command. Everything, in fact, went in his favour, and what did he do ? spent his time firing off his gun (it must be admitted, with considerable accuracy) at interminable flocks of partridges and pheasants in order to outdo some of his friends who were obsessed by a similar mania ! Well might Dr. Arnold declare that there was 10 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS no earthly thing more mean and despicable than an English gentleman destitute of all sense of his responsibilities and opportunities, and only revelling in the luxuries of our high civilization, and thinking himself a great person. It is sad to think how~much the great families of England might have done, and how small are their actual performances in recent times. With their inherited wealth and prestige they could easily have retained the power that their ancestors used not amiss. Unfortunately, as a clever Radical writer once said, " their translation of the phrase noblesse oblige seems to be ' Nobility obliges us to do nothing.' " Shooting, in spite of humanitarian twaddle, is an excellent sport which, besides, provides very palat- able and wholesome food for numbers of people, but to make it an all-engrossing hobby is ignoble and utterly unworthy of a really civilized man. It would be a good thing for a large proportion of the wealthier class if this were realized. The old-fashioned aristocracy, though it liked its pleasures, clearly perceived the wisdom of gaining the support of its humble neighbours. The less far- seeing aristocrat of to-day too often sees nothing of the small local gentry, and thus alienates a valuable political ally. No wonder that many a landowner, having had to exchange his luxurious mansion for a small London flat, sits bewailing that Radical legislation is ruining the country by which, of course, he means himself. MARRYING FOR MONEY 11 The fashion of despising the small squirearchy, which was formerly such a prop of the large land- owners, is responsible for much ill-feeling. After all, numbers of poor countryfolk are in reality of better blood than most of our newly manufactured peers. They are, however, ill-equipped with means and there is nothing to be got out of them, which, of course, constitutes a fatal defect in the eyes of an aristocracy "on the make." Owing to various sources of income, such as sine- cures and revenue from land, being greatly lessened, the upper classes have of late been forced to look about for some means of replenishing their depleted coffers. Rich marriages, a perfectly correct and time- honoured way of reviving failing fortunes, cannot always be brought off. The alternative is, there- fore, either to work or live upon somebody else. High-spirited scions of noble descent cannot extract cash from foreign financiers so easily as their ancestors pillaged the Jews of the Middle Ages a number of whose descendants, by the way, have since taken an ample revenge. This being so, it naturally chooses the time-honoured method of making a rich marriage. The aristocracy of Eng- land, as a matter of fact, has always recruited its fortunes by marriages with young ladies of great wealth, often, even in the past, of very obscure birth. It had no liking, however, for marrying girls of no family with no money, and would have been \ 12 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS horrified at the behaviour of some of the younger generation of the English aristocracy who have foolishly reversed this policy. Instead of following their ancestors' examples and marrying heiresses, it has become quite usual for young fellows of good family to espouse minor stars of the theatrical profession whom their ancestors of the eighteenth century would have thought only good enough to wile away a stray hour or two by dancing to the music of a blind fiddler. Though alliances between the stage and the peer- age were not unknown after the latter part of the eighteenth century, previous to that period they were almost unheard of pride of birth prevented that. Look at Hogarth's pictures of the old nobleman (Lord Scarsdale of the first creation) with his coroneted crutch pointing to his family-tree while he is arranging the marriage of his son with the rich merchant's daughter. He is bestowing an honour for which any amount of bags of gold are but a paltry remuneration. It was this pride of birth, absurd as it may be, which kept the old English aristocracy, now so sadly apologetic, in a position of power and command. As the old emperors and kings absolutely believed that they ruled by right divine, so did these old noblemen believe that they were really and truly formed of a clay superior to that which went to the making of their more plebeian fellows. This may have been a nonsensical idea, but if you believe a thing implicitly it is already half true at ARISTOCRATIC BLOOD 13 all events, you will certainly get a number of other people to believe it. The old-fashioned English aristocrat considered himself of an entirely different type from the rest of the world, whom at heart he tolerated only on sufferance. The unswerving and unconscious pride of such a man did not prevent him from being just and kindly in his relations with those beneath him in the social scale. His ideas of duty were rigidly defined. One of the best definitions of the characteristics of this type was the criticism which the Due de Broglie passed upon the great Duke of Wellington. " He was a thorough Englishman, and one of the old stock; downright, straightforward, stable, circumspect, but stiff, austere, and rather narrow." It may here be remarked that, from a purely scientific point of view, the idea that aristocratic blood is superior to plebeian, though now a good deal exploded and jeered at, is in one way not so entirely erroneous. It used to be an accepted adage in the Navy that in expeditions involving much trying exposure and hardship the men always succumbed before the officers, while in journeys to high latitudes the latter, nine times out of ten, had to drag the former back. Numberless and convincing instances of the constitutional superiority of the individual of gentle blood over his fellows of lowly birth could be given. It is, indeed, almost a law of nature that the gentleman survives where the plebeian dies. The reason, quite unromantic, is after all simple, 14 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS the whole thing being merely a question of feeding and care in early years. For a good many generations the child of gentle birth has had an abundance of suitable food. For countless generations the children of the poor have been either very badly nurtured or given the wrong kind of nourishment. What wonder, then, that the aristocratic constitution, well fortified in early youth, should be vastly superior to that of the majority of the proletariat, in whom the lamp of life, during childhood, has been kept alight by a very poor or unsuitable kind of oil? In addition to this, the upper classes usually have some fairly sound ideas as to the treatment of infantile maladies. The lower classes, on the other hand, though things perhaps are now a little better than they were, have always been, and to a great extent are still, permeated by mediaeval ideas as to medical treatment, the administration of medicines, and the dangerous effects of fresh air, the result being that their offspring are often at a dis- advantage in fighting against even trifling ailments. Besides a certain physical superiority resulting from suitable environment and from a healthy life for great landowners in old days passed much of their time on their estates education and training imbued the heir to great possessions with the conviction that as a superior kind of being there were certain things which he must on no account do. There can be no doubt that in the majority of instances the result was a strength of character sadly wanting in the aristocracy of the present day. SOMETHING FOR NOTHING 15 The old English gentleman was, as a rule, honour- able and, according to the traditions of his caste, just, his main fault having been a lack of that flexibility of mind which is unfortunately too superabundant in the modern patrician. Though the innate pride of birth which distinguished the old English aristocracy is now but a thing of the past and to-day merely a matter for wonder and amusement, I think that from a business-like point of view its disappearance has been a very great misfortune to the so-called upper classes, who, if they had kept abreast of the times and retained the acquisitive and shrewd mentality of their forefathers, would have exploited it to good advantage even under the altered circumstances of to-day. Instead of rushing with open arms to welcome wealthy people of no matter what origin as they emerged from the slums, they should have remained as judiciously exclusive as possible, by which means they would have kept a good deal of power, while acquiring wealth on far better terms than those they have sunk to accepting to-day. It was their women who began the degringolade, imbued as they were with the feminine idea that it was possible to get something for nothing ; they could not resist the comparatively trifling gifts and ostentatious hospitality of the new millionaires, for which in the long run the aristocracy has had to pay such a heavy price. Great discredit has also been brought upon what used to be recognized as the ruling class by the lavish 16 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS bestowal of titles upon wealthy nobodies. We can still re-echo the words of Tom Moore : " Tis pleasant, while nothing but mercantile fractures, Some simple, some compound, is dinned in our ears, To think that, though robbed of all coarse manufactures, We keep up our fine manufacture of peers." Not a few wealthy men are quite shameless in the methods they adopt to obtain a peerage, and the coterie which considers itself Society considers this sort of thing quite legitimate. Some little time ago I was discussing a certain Radical who recently received a baronetcy with some friends who are by way of being stanch Conserva- tives. I said that the way this individual, a member of Parliament, wealthy and of good family, went about preaching the most advanced Radicalism and sup- porting all sorts of canting measures which in private life he was known to laugh at, was contemptible. I was told that I was both silly and unkind. " Everyone knows," said they, "that Sir (such a charming man, and his wife so nice too !) is really not a Radical at all, but only anxious to get a peerage. As you know, he is already well on the way towards one ; when he reaches the House of Lords all that nonsense he talks about his love of the people will be put aside." In plain words, this man's life is passed in bambooz- ling various constituencies (for, one or two having found him out, he has had to change his seat) in order ultimately to obtain a seat in that House of Lords which he devotes so much energy to abusing. THE PEERAGE 17 Anything more disgraceful from an honest point of view it is impossible to conceive. Peerages were originally never intended to be conferred upon wealthy manufacturers who have made their money by getting other people to work for them on the cheapest possible terms. On the other hand, though austere Radicalism may hold up its hands in horror, it was certainly recognized in ancient days that a king should ennoble such of his illegitimate offspring as he chose. Taking the whole system of European aristocracy as it then existed, it would have been very strange had any other idea prevailed. Approve or not, everyone with the slightest tinge of romance thinks sympathetically of the grandes amoureses who beguiled the monarchs of the past. On the whole, with, of course, the excep- tion of the hateful old Maintenon, whose cruel bigotry caused Louis XIV to drive the clever, hardworking Huguenots out of France, I do not believe they did as much harm as our jabbering, self-seeking, meddling politicians do in the modern world. Thank goodness, not one of the latter seems likely to be remembered as sympathetically as Nell Gwyn, the pretty Hereford lass, who, from selling oranges at the theatre, rose to be not merely the favourite actress of the time, but the mother of a duke and the ancestress of a bishop. Personally, I prefer peers descended from pretty girls and Stuart Kings to some of our newly manu- factured ones, whose forbears went about dabbling in minor industries of a dubious nature associated with the basement. 18 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS For some reason or other, probably atavism, there is a tendency for the sons of millionaires sprung from the gutter to be particularly uncouth and unpresent- able. Before a peerage is conferred it is now, indeed, usual for some one in a responsible position to have a good look at the prospective peer's sons. A remark made by the chauffeur of one of our new nobility proves what a necessary precaution this is. His master, who had bought a fine property in the West of England, had, after the manner of his kind, made himself thoroughly unpopular with his neigh- bours. Though a Radical, he was more particular about anyone coming on to his land than any of the wicked Tory landowners of the past had ever been. So far did he carry his selfishness that for the first time for a long number of years the Yeomanry were not allowed to camp in his park. What wonder that the newly made peer was re- garded with contempt and dislike by almost everyone in his neighbourhood. The chauffeur one day discussing this unpopularity with a friend, however, defended his master, against whom he had little reason for complaint. " I tell you," said he, " they may say what they like: the old man ain't so bad, but, by Jingo, you should see our eldest son ! " " He is so rich ! " is often heard as an apology for the bestowal of some particular undeserved honour. Why in these professedly democratic days mere wealth alone should entitle an individual to have a voice in legislating for his less fortunate fellow-creatures, THE OLD SCHOOL 19 nobody is quite able to explain. The result of all this is that while the aristocracy, as a class, is as rich or richer than it ever was, its prestige, most precious possession of all, except amongst Jew millionaires and American snobs (who, having purchased the stock, naturally dread a slump), has passed almost completely away. The people of England, a large number of whom, I am glad to say, retain the straightforward non-toadying spirit which distinguished the fine old English of the past, laugh at it, and well they may. The old-fashioned aristocrat, proud, narrow, but with well-defined principles and an innate conviction that he was in some vague way responsible for the well-being of England, was to many a sort of superior being, not quite of the same kind as the people they saw every day. His vices and failings generally of what has been somewhat snobbishly termed an aristocratic kind were not blazoned abroad, while, to do him justice, he was quite prepared to incur any amount of trouble or inconvenience in order to fulfil such duties as his class were expected to perform. His pride, though often great, was never blatant or vulgar with many, indeed, it was a sort of second nature. The real old-fashioned aristocrat, indeed, never for a second doubted that he represented a class which was the very salt of the earth. Just, and not unkindly, he held very strong views as to the necessity for keeping himself rather aloof from his social inferiors, whose lot in life was not to push them- selves forward, but to do their duty in that state of life to which it had pleased God to call them. 20 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS He expected respect and often inspired it, for, with all his faults, there is no doubt he was a valuable national asset. Unlike the modern peer, he had no idea of assuming a defensive " I am not so bad after all " attitude. Providence had placed him above other men, and that was enough. This system of a privileged class, while probably better suited to the needs of old-fashioned England than people of to-day are prepared to admit, was, of course, accompanied by certain abuses which ac- cording to modern ideas were quite indefensible. Wealthy noblemen, unless they took an interest in politics, served the State or went into the Army or Navy ; they were virtually excluded from following any profession. It was tacitly understood that men of their class, provided they committed no real crime, were quite entitled to lead any sort of life they liked, but they could not go into trade, which was then taboo to a man of gentle blood. The latter idea, one of the most absurd which ever existed, made loafers of numbers of well-born younger sons, who, owing to their ancestry, found themselves obliged either to live upon sinecures or upon their relatives. The bad old system by which men of good family received handsome salaries, not for doing anything, but for being the sons of their respective fathers, up to the end of the eighteenth century existed in pro- fusion not only in England but all over Europe. Under the old French monarchy all offices were sold, and the great nobility, being for many ages the SINECURES 21 only opulent persons in the kingdom, enjoyed a monopoly of all places of trust and emolument. For a time they did very well. Gradually commerce and industry creating and bringing together the materials of luxury, the nobles were tempted to exhaust their fortunes in procuring personal enjoyments, by which means they became gradually impoverished. They were consequently unable to purchase places at Court, which passed, therefore, into the hands of the middle classes, who rose in wealth as the aristocracy declined. This was the first step towards the events of 1789. In England, though things never reached such a bad pitch, numbers of the aristocracy lived upon the State. A member of one noble family, for instance, was Secretary of the Council, Remembrancer of the Court of Exchequer, Clerk of Common Pleas in Barbados, also Registrar in Chancery, and Clerk of the Patents in Jamaica, all which duties were of course discharged by deputy and brought their for- tunate holder an annual income of over five thousand a year. The Governorship of Virginia was in the eighteenth century a military sinecure, the holder of which could remain in London. In 17 28 the troubled state of that province would no longer admit of a non-resident Governor, and its Assembly, while voting the salary, had made complaint that they received no service in return. With the unanimous consent of the Cabinet the Governor of the day was informed that the King must call upon him to resign his post, but was willing to grant him an adequate pension until another 22 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS appointment of the same value could be found for him. Numbers of individuals contrived to keep their nests well feathered by drawing money from an ap- preciative country, while the number of persons of gentle birth who managed to make some comfortable little addition to their income by means of Court appointments, ornamental colonelcies, or other offices was extremely large. Very shocking all this, no doubt, but as matters stood then there was not much cause for surprise. As a matter of fact, a country is, of course, in a minor degree, always exploited by somebody. Whether a peer or a democrat takes the money is really unim- portant, and certainly the old-fashioned peers generally spent the money obtained by sinecures very freely ; also they had a number of individuals lesser fleas who lived upon them. The author of the Greville " Memoirs " drew ^500 as late Naval Officer at Demerara, with ,2,000 more as Clerk of the Privy Council, and with yet ^3,000 more as Secretary and Clerk of the Enrolments at Jamaica. Another Charles Greville drew 600 per annum as Comptroller of Cash in the Excise at London, ^600 more as Receiver of Taxes at Nottingham, ^350 more as Secretary of the Island of Tobago, and yet again ^572 allowance as Naval Officer at Trinidad. About the best example of a first-class holder of sinecures, however, was the third Marquis of Hertford Thackeray's Lord Steyne. No doubt in a great SEYMOUR PLACES 23 measure owing to his friendship with the Prince Regent, he held a number of public offices, the duties of which probably troubled him little. He was Vice- Chamberlain, Lord Warden of the Stannaries, Lord Steward and Vice-Admiral of the Duchy of Cornwall, Chief Commissioner of the Duchy, and even Recorder of Coventry and Bodmin until the reform of the municipal corporations. A most stinging epigram upon the sinecures of this nobleman was the one written by Tom Moore ; it purported to be a conversation between a dowager and her maid : " ' I want the Court Guide,' said my lady, ' to look If the house, Seymour Place, be at 30 or 20 '; ' We've lost the Court Guide, ma'am, but here's the Red Book, Where you'll find, I dare say, Seymour Places in plenty.' " In those days there was much truth in this epigram. The Seymours figured in every capacity, from am- bassadors to wharfingers and from serjeants-at-arms to housekeepers. The old-fashioned peers, if they enjoyed large benefits, were, in return, generally ready to give their lives for their country. Many met their death on hard-fought fields ; many more cheerfully faced exile and hard knocks in search of reputation, and the majority were always ready for any rough work. The old English aristocracy was essentially adven- turous and, though some of them managed to get through a good deal of public money, taking one thing with another, did much for their country. 24 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Thirty or forty years ago, when younger sons of good family realized the absolute necessity for doing something to make money, the City first claimed their attention, and since then a gradually increasing crowd of impoverished young fellows of good family have been flocking into the City to earn a livelihood by commissions. While the aristocracy has now long ceased to despise trade, it is remarkable that none of the wealthier amongst them have striven to assure the prosperity of their family fortunes by themselves founding- businesses. Had they had the sense to emulate the merchant princes of the Middle Ages, which many might have done, who knows but that they would not have rehabilitated their class ? Some rich peers, more farseeing than their fellows, it is true, have invested large sums in Canada and other portions of that Greater Britain beyond the Seas which, in the future, will probably enjoy great prosperity, but such enterprise does not appeal to the majority, who, merely groaning at the increase of taxation, have no idea of marching with the times. As for the considerable class of younger sons, who have no regular occupation at all, they strive to keep things going in all sorts of ways, but a few being none too particular as to what those ways may be. " I don't believe in noblesse oblige," I once heard one of these young fellows say ; " that's all gone by the board now you've got to get what you can." This remark, though jokingly said, was sadly OLD BEAUX 25 significant of the mental attitude of the class to which the speaker belonged. A noticeable symptom of the changed habits of the last two generations is the disappearance of that somewhat worthless type who, under various names buck, dandy, swell, masher, and dude was once such a feature of West End life. His nearest equivalent to-day, I suppose, is the democratic " Nut," who slouches along where erst- while stalked the patrician beau. Except from a picturesque point of view this disappearance is perhaps scarcely to be deplored. The old beaux of the past in particular would be thoroughly out of place to-day. Though many a one had fought gallantly for his country, as a class they were for the most part somewhat disreputable and selfish old men. There were, however, exceptions who were charming. Such a one was the late Mr. Mackenzie Grieves, who lived mostly in Paris, where for many years he was a leading figure in everything relating to the French turf. Highly popular and respected, his memory is kept green by a race at Longchamps which in his honour was named " le Prix Mackenzie Grieves." His affability to everyone, his charm of manner and immaculate appearance made a great impression upon my boyish mind. Though he had taken up his residence in Paris and paid but occasional visits to this country, he remained the complete and perfect type of the old-fashioned English gentleman. As a young man he had served in the Life Guards, and 26 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS to his last days he retained much of the smart military bearing which was such a characteristic of the British officer of a past generation. Very different in appearance, manners, and ways, however, were most of the old beaux who lingered on into the early eighties of the last century. I can just remember some of these padded and bewigged old fellows as they were tottering to the grave. Some of them who had been brave soldiers fought as gallantly against the ravages of Time as they had done at Inkermann and Balaclava for their Queen. The effect as a rule was, however, pitiable. As is now sensibly recognized, it is more seemly and decent for a man of pleasure after a vie orageuse to view life through the mellowing medium of philosophy. A sensible man, with his appetites curbed by the stern discipline of time, provided he retains the faculty of appreciating humour, can lead a life of considerable happiness and calm. Such an idea did not, however, at all appeal to the majority of the old bucks, devotees of Bacchus and Silenus, who lingered about West End thoroughfares as late as the early eighties. Some of them, known by sight to many Londoners, had almost become institutions of the town. They ogled and occasionally attempted to enter into conversation with pretty women about the streets, but I do not think much harm was done. True virtue can afford to laugh at fossilized vice, and the old wrecks were easily sent to the rightabout. While the morality of such men was very low, they MERETRICIOUS PLEASURE 27 were probably at heart not a whit worse than the more restrained and more careful men of to-day. It should be taken into account that up to the early part of the nineteenth century a very free morality formed a great, almost the principal, part of the life of rich Englishmen, without any offence being given to the conscience of the community. Princes took their own course along the line of limitless desires and their courtiers followed. Lord Pembroke, who was well known for his elopement with Miss Kitty Hunter, was universally esteemed as an "accom- plished nobleman " ; the Earl Bishop of Derry, the Duke of Devonshire who died in 1811, Lord Egre- mont, Lord Hertford, and, not least, Lord Darlington, were all, to use the phrase of Wraxall, "well known in the annals of meretricious pleasure." Their point of view perhaps was best expressed by Renan when he wrote : " Le monde, dont les juge- ments sont rarement tout a fait faux, voit une sorte de ridicule a etre vertueux quand on n'y est pas oblige" par un devoir professionel. Le pretre, ayant pour e"tat d'etre chaste, comme le soldat d'etre brave, est, d'apres ces idees, presque le seul qui puisse sans ridicule tenir a des principes sur lesquels la morale et la mode se livrent les plus Granges combats." Be this as it may, it is impossible to deny that in the past the majority of public men, even the cleverest, were prone to be ardent devotees of him whom Buddha called the Lord of Pleasure and the God of Death. II POLITICS THE old-fashioned idea of politics at least that held by people of property was that by a sort of tacit agreement it should be kept as much as possible a game, the principal players in which should belong to some of the great titled houses, strong enough to move about the rank and file of their respective parties like pawns. Never- theless there was, however, more independence in the House of Commons then than exists to-day, when members have sunk to being mere voting- machines. The sums which were spent by wealthy noblemen in capturing or holding seats for their party were often enormous. To-day peers have comparatively little influence in politics, and the sturdy independent Member of Parliament of former days is as extinct as the dodo. The old England which this type of man loved is but a memory. As a matter of fact it vanished years ago. " Avec Lord Londonderry [Lord Castlereagh]," wrote Chateaubriand, "expira la vieille Angleterre, A GLOOMY FORECAST 29 jusqu'alors se d^battant au milieu des innovations croissantes. Survint M. Canning : 1'amour-propre 1'emporta jusqu'a parler a la tribune la langue du propagandiste. Apres lui parut le Due de Welling- ton, conservateur qui venait demolir : quand 1'arret des societe"s est prononce", la main qui devait elever ne sait qu'abattre. Lord Grey, O'Connell, tous ces ouvriers en ruines, travaillerent successivement a la chute des vieilles institutions. ReTorme parlemen- taire, emancipation de 1'Irlande, toutes choses excel- lentes en soi, devinrent, par 1'insalubrite des temps, des causes de destruction. . . . " Lord Liverpool avait lui-meme de tristes pressentiments. Je dinais un jour chez lui : apres le repas nous causames a une fenetre qui s'ouvrait sur la Tamise ; on apercevait en avance de la riviere une partie de la cite" dont le brouillard et la fume'e elargissaient la masse. Je faisais a mon hote 1'eloge de la solidite de cette monarchic anglaise pondere"e par le balancement egal de la liberte* et du pouvoir. Le venerable lord, levant et allongeant le bras, me montra de la main la cite" et me dit : * Qu'y a-t-il de solide avec ces villes e'normes ? Une insurrection serieuse a Londres, et tout est perdu.' " This gloomy forecast, happily, has not yet been realized. At the same time disquieting symptoms of unrest were not wanting during the great railway strike. Agitators abound, and slippery-minded politicians do not scruple to make speeches intended to inflame the lower class against the upper. 30 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS I have heard this defended on the plea that in order to obtain the necessary driving force for social legislation enthusiasm and excitement are indis- pensable. Moderate men who sanction such dangerous methods should remember the words of the old coloured preacher, descanting upon the difficulties of the sinner: " My brudrin," said he, " it am easy to row a boat ober Niagary Falls, but a tremenjus job to row it back again." With the insincerity which, unhappily, seems the appanage of political life, a number of public men are ready to abuse anybody or anything in order to pander to the electorate. To pull down from above is easier than to build up from below. Curiously enough, some of those who are the most vehement in calling for equal rights for all are the least democratic in their private lives. Catherine Macaulay, who wrote a " History of England from the Accession of James the First to the Elevation of the House of Hanover," in the second half of the eighteenth century, had Republican ideas and was fiercely democratic in her writings. One day at her house Dr. Johnson pretended to be a convert to her doctrines. " I am convinced, like you, madam," he said, " that all mankind ought to be upon an equal footing, and to give you an un- mistakable proof, madam, that I am in earnest, there is a very sensible, civil, well-behaved fellow-citizen, your footman. I desire that he may be allowed to DOWN, NOT UP! 31 sit down and dine with us." Catherine Macaulay resented the suggestion. " I showed her the absurdity of her levelling doctrines," said the Doctor, "and she has never liked me since. Your levellers wish to level down as far as themselves, but they cannot bear levelling up to themselves." When all is said and done it must be admitted that, considering the enormous power enjoyed by the upper classes before the passing of the great Reform Bill, the almost unlimited opportunities they had for plunder and the usual effect of such oppor- tunities upon human nature of no matter what class, the wonder is that they showed so much moderation. In return for steering England into a position of commanding power risking and giving their lives freely by land and sea, running the government of the country admittedly with more consideration and fairness to the humbler classes than prevailed anywhere else in Europe, they were, according to their lights, surely entitled to see that their younger sons and relatives without means were provided for for life. I believe that no Radicals or Socialists of the present day would have, under the circum- stances, shown such self-restraint. So-called democratic government, owing to what seems an almost inevitable tendency of popular leaders to make money, generally proves the most expensive of all. The business of government, as conducted in old days, was intimately connected with a number of social forms and usages which are now completely 32 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS obsolete. Society exercised real political power, and almost every politician of eminence, more or less, bowed to its decrees. Even thirty-five years ago distinguished statesmen attached serious importance to social ordinances, and, following the example of their predecessors, dined out and gave dinners regularly. A prominent public man had to do an enormous amount of dining-out. Lord Beaconsfield's doctors were of opinion that the multitude of dinners he had been forced to attend shortened his life. The London season was coincident with the Parliamentary Session, and from February to July the dinner-parties and other entertainments arranged for the amusement of the politicians and their belongings exceeded the sum of those given in all the other European capitals put together. A certain amount of formality still prevailed. Dinner- parties were regarded as serious functions, and throwing over people at the last moment, or being late, regarded as grave breaches of good manners. Occasionally, Cabinet Ministers who were expected to dinner were prevented by stress of Parlia- mentary business from putting in an appearance, but that was the rare exception ; and in a general way the dinner-party and the evening reception were institutions not less stereotyped and sacred in the London spring and summer than the sittings of both Houses of Parliament. In short, Politics and Society then went hand in hand. I do not know, however, that the affairs of the Empire suffered in consequence. CASTING OF NETS 33 London Society as at that time constituted was of immense service to the Conservative cause, all sorts of useful people being adroitly drawn into its net, a process which was greatly assisted by the tactful manoeuvres of a certain number of recognized hostesses, the like of whom do not exist to-day. The Conservatives, indeed, may be said to have possessed a regular social organization devoted to forwarding the interests of the party. Many ladies prominent in Society, for instance, spared no effort to make the wives and daughters of the parvenus actually in Parliament or anxious to get into Par- liament, on the Tory side, at home. On the other hand, the wives and daughters of Liberal M.P.'s on the same social level were neglected or cold- shouldered, or treated only with frigid and con- ventional civility, by the grandes dames of Whiggism or the smart ladies of Liberalism. Consequently those who entered political life, as many did, at the promptings of social ambition or to gratify the ladies of their family could count upon a more definite social reward by joining the Conservatives, whose ranks were thus recruited by numerous astute individuals. The hob-nobbing between men of the rival parties which is such a significant and none too reassuring feature of modern English social life did not then prevail. A real antagonism seemed to exist between the two parties, and a large part of the conversation at Conservative dinner-tables consisted in abuse of Mr. Gladstone, whom numbers of violent people regarded as a kind of Beelzebub. 34 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Modern Tories have now long modified their views as to the statesman in question. Quite a number of them, indeed, declare that Mr. Gladstone would have opposed certain measures passed by the present Liberal Government ; nevertheless, it must not be forgotten that it was Mr. Gladstone who paved the way for what has occurred since his time. Though an excessively clever man, there can be no doubt that, even when facts were against him, he would never admit himself to be wrong, and always cherished the comfortable conviction that what he did or what he abstained from doing was right. Imagination he strangely lacked, as well as the faculty of making allowances for race or climate, historical antecedents, national peculiarities. A striking proof of this is the behaviour of Mr. Gladstone's " interesting nationalities " his favourite Balkan States who have lately been so busy cutting one another's throats. His impassioned plea for the simple-minded Christians who were subjected to the brutal rule of the unspeakable Turk, and his horror at " Bulgarian atrocities," roused a large section of England to a state of outraged indignation. What, I wonder, would he say to the well-authenticated and horrible atrocities committed not on but by his pet Bulgarians during the recent war ? That " interesting nationality" has at least been far from justifying the faith which the Grand Old Man reposed in her. No parallel, it is said, can be found for the horrors committed by her soldiers in and about Adrianople, AN INTERESTING NATIONALITY 35 outraging, killing, and burning in the most fiendish manner wherever they went. When the Turks reoccupied the town Enver Bey and his men were received with rapture by 100,000 inhabitants. This is the first, time in history that Europeans, Greeks, and Armenians have received Moslems with open arms as their long-hoped-for protectors, rending the air with their shouts of joy. "Europeans declared that they would rather go through a whole year of a siege with shot and shell flying about than endure a single month of the Bulgarian reign of terror. " Not a single one of the Turkish prisoners survived. Certain is it that hundreds of fettered Greeks were every day dragged through the city. If one of them just bent down to pick up a scrap of food from the ground, he received a prod from a bayonet, and dozens of corpses were every day carried off the two or three miles of road from Karagatsch to Adrianople and hurled into the rivers. " The ingenuity Mr. Gladstone's favourites put into their martyrdoms of the poor people baffles description. According to the Press, Turkish women were crucified, and before the breath had left their bodies carved and flayed even in their death-agonies they were not safe from fresh tortures. Many wells were filled to the brim with the bodies of Turkish women, and many others were poisoned in different ways. " Robbery and extortion ran riot. In the Mosque of Selim at Adrianople only the worthless carpets 36 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS were left, and even these had pieces cut out of their corners or middles. Bulgarian officers of all grades simply stole just as it seemed good to them. When General Christowitch was asked by a European merchant for protection against the robbers, he replied : ' What can you expect ? the young fellows, are, after all, only taking away mementoes.' Which reply gained for him the nickname of ' General Memento.' " About two hundred trainloads of goods ' requisi- tioned ' from Adrianople steamed back to Bulgaria. Pianos, carpets, curtains, spoons, forks,* chairs, tables in short, everything movable was carted off. If a mob of the invaders came across anything that was not worth taking, they just cut it in pieces or burnt it." The results of the emancipation of the Balkan States seem to have had anything but a mollifying effect upon their inhabitants. According to the Press, something like 200,000 non-combatants, including thousands of men and children, were massacred in the province of Thrace alone. This historic butchery, it should be thoroughly realized, was the work of the simple-minded Christians whom Radical sentimentalists have persistently held up as displaying the most praiseworthy and for- giving fortitude under the oppression and brutality of the wicked Turk but then, careful examination of facts more or less proves that sentimentalists are always wrong. For Mr. Gladstone, with his sincere but exagge- A GUARDED FLAME 37 rated indignation concerning the Bulgarian atrocities of the past (most of which were never proved), there was, of course, a great excuse. Native Christians under Mohammedan rule he always imagined as law- abiding, religious folk, leading much the same kind of orderly life as his own villagers at Hawarden, to whom he read the lessons every Sunday. His knowledge of foreign countries was of necessity extremely limited, and in a great measure gleaned from informants anxious to tell him what he wanted to hear ; his whole bent of mind and disposition resembled that of a very cultured ecclesiastic rather than that of a practical and farseeing statesman. During his latter years, at least, the old statesman "a guarded flame," shielded from all annoyance by his intimates had little opportunity of learning any unpleasant truths. Everything of a nature to irritate or annoy him was kept out of his way ; even the daily papers were subjected to a kindly censorship by his devoted wife, who took care to prevent his attention being called to any paragraphs likely to disturb him. One result of this was that he went to his grave believing that parliamentary institu- tions and representative government were not only the supreme end at which to aim, but the regime to which all nationalities were instinctively capable of adapting themselves. In foreign politics his view would seem to have been that every male child born into the world, whether British or Bulgarian, Armenian or African, Egyptian or Zulu, Aztec or Esquimaux, was capable of being educated 38 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS into a free and independent elector for an English borough. Mr. Gladstone, largely no doubt owing to his entourage of worshippers, was to a great extent self- centred. Whether at heart he was ever really a Radical in the modern acceptation of the term seems rather doubtful. Notwithstanding a blind and almost pathetic belief in representative institutions, any form of government which might have declined to take his own views into account would have aroused his wrath. Perhaps the most Radical characteristic about him was a love of unlimited freedom of speech, espe- cially for himself. He might have been said, indeed, to have lived in an agreeable world of his own, in which everything he said or did was in the nature of things right. How can a man whose whole life is passed with one particular set of individuals, who always agree with him, ever have the slightest conception of what existence really is ? Can the social reformer understand why the bar-lounger cheerfully leads a life of sodden inebriety, or can the racing-man realize that even the certainty of backing several really good things has no power to tempt the student from his books or the scientist from his laboratory? Byron said of Napoleon that what he most liked in his character was his want of sympathy, which proved his knowledge of man, as those only could possess sympathy who were in happy ignorance of human nature. Unlimited sympathy with suffering humanity, which was a peculiar characteristic of Mr. A SOPHISTICAL RHETORICIAN 39 Gladstone, undoubtedly warped his judgment and dis- torted his sense of proportion. Notwithstanding all his wonderful intellectual gifts, there was ever a certain ingenuousness about some of the great statesman's ideas. I believe that he once in print actually advo- cated a line of rail running all round the English coast- line as being the best form of national defence, because artillery could thus be easily moved from point to point ! About the real characteristics and failings of the world in general he was very hazy indeed. The intense insularity of his point of view occasionally rather inclines one to doubt whether Mr. Gladstone was a great statesman at all ; at any rate, his widespread sympathy with nationalities, especially small ones, about which he was in reality profoundly ignorant, causes him to be almost better remembered outside England than at home, where his memory is, perhaps, not as green as his commanding intellect and fine character deserved it to be. Probably, as a new and clever writer (Mr. Esme Wingfield Stratford) has recently declared, it was a certain incoherence and lack of backbone which has consigned nearly every- thing that Mr. Gladstone ever wrote or spoke to oblivion. Definite principle or a coherent system of thought seems to have been positively repugnant to this great statesman, whom his rival once not inaptly dubbed "a sophistical rhetorician." Like the modern Japanese, he got his theories and ideas from widely different sources his theology from Oxford, political economy from Liverpool, his love of liberty from 40 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Naples. To sustain any pet contention he was apt to draw support from books. A fine scholar, few have ever known so much about them as he did. There was, however, one important exception the Book of Life. If Mr. Gladstone is not sufficiently remembered by a new generation, no man received more appreciation than he during his lifetime. Not infrequently his admirers, indeed, attributed to his influence reforms and innovations which had never been carried out at all. Going into a village shop one day, I happened to embark upon a chat with its proprietor as to the merits and demerits of the Grand Old Man, who had just made a speech which had attracted great attention. " Well, sir," said this tradesman, a note of warm admi- ration in his voice, " whatever people may say against Mr. Gladstone, I for my part can never forget that he gave England 'one man one vote.' " I thought it useless to point out that this was exactly what Mr. Gladstone had never brought about, and passed on to topics of a less controversial nature. One great merit Lord Beaconsfield's rival undoubtedly had to which full justice has never been done. He was not a sentimentalist in a hurry ; that is to say, he was not ready to crush out personal liberty in order to redress some vague grievance without thoroughly going into the pros and cons of the matter. I fancy that a good deal of our latter- day humanitarian legislation would have been little to his taste. At the same time, in international COMMON SENSE 41 matters, Mr. Gladstone certainly represented uncalculating and over-enthusiastic altruism, just as the late Duke of Devonshire represented that scarce and precious attribute in these days, alas! so rarely to be found " ordinary common sense." It was for this reason that when the latter was Lord Hartington, he possessed such overwhelming influence in the House of Commons. Though nominally a Liberal, the Duke had all the characteristics of his class, including a somewhat cynical contempt for his social inferiors, whether Radicals or Conservatives. It is said that, being once asked whether political demonstrations ought not to be forbidden in Hyde Park on Sundays, he replied, with a characteristic sneer, which had in it nothing that was affected, offensive, or insincere, that he could not for the life of him see why, if you were to admit a well-dressed mob into the "Park on week-days, you should exclude from it a less well- dressed mob on the Sabbath. From this utterance it may be gathered that he was somewhat con- temptuous of humanity in the mass, which in reality merely proves that he was a true aristocrat ; for if vulgarity is merely a form of sympathy with the greatest number, it is equally true that sympathy with the greatest number is merely a form of vulgarity. In these days when (in the writer's opinion largely by reason of their own ineptitude, slackness, and lack of intelligence) peers have come to be of small account, the old conception of a great English 42 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS aristocrat has almost ceased to be remembered. The old-fashioned nobleman of other days was a type apart. Frigidity and hauteur were often his characteristics, but, unpleasant as these qualities usually are, there was something so high-bred about many of the stiff old peers that much could be forgiven. Many a one, after passing through a period agitated by wild indiscretions, seemed to have bidden a last farewell to folly, and, as it were, frozen into the exemplar of an immaculate, unemotional, self-possessed British nobleman. A curious charac- teristic of not a few of this class who had been dandies in their youth was their apparent contempt for clothes ; the love of some of them for ancient raiment was remarkable. The late Duke of Devonshire almost exactly realized this conception. True to the type, after a joyous youth he became the very incarnation of British stolidity. His whole attitude latterly was one of detachment from all mundane things ; and though he continued to go out a good deal he generally seemed to be bored. Assemblages of his fellow-creatures, of no matter what kind, appealed to him but little. It was once shrewdly said that the Duke's attitude towards society was rather that of a man reconciled to it than anything else. He, as it were, acquiesced in it, even as he acquiesced in, and was reconciled to, the politicians with whom he had cast in his lot, the exalted station to which he had been born, and the dukedom which he undoubtedly adorned. Nevertheless, his manner remained suggestive of a semi-contemptuous protest IN WOEFUL PLIGHT 43 against politics, society, the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and everything else. He put up with them all, however, and his absolute integrity and detachment from self-interest, together with his great common sense, gave him a unique position as a man to be looked up to and trusted. This being so, it was no wonder that even in his latter years, when he had become a Liberal- Unionist, the Duke remained a tower of strength to his party, which at the present time, notwithstanding having had numberless opportunities (missed), is in such woeful plight. Considering, indeed, the chances which the Conservatives have let slip, it would seem as if they did not really wish to come in at all. For years their main idea has apparently been merely to abuse their opponents for remaining in office and to shrink from taking their place. The main Conservative characteristic since the death of Lord Beaconsfield has been to show complete lack of courage. Their pitiable tactics deceive no one, not even King Demos, with whom they are always seeking to outbid their opponents. Luck has also deserted them. As a matter of fact, it was quite by accident that Disraeli, a man of commanding genius, found himself at the head of the Conservative party, for at heart he was probably not more of a Conservative than he was anything else. The career of this really great man is one of the most extraordinary in our political history. No one could have started with greater odds against him than the author of "Lothair." To begin with, his descent 44 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS put him at a considerable disadvantage, though of course the stock he came from was of a totally differ- ent kind from that which has produced so many of our modern Hebrew millionaires. Disraeli sprang from the aristocratic section of the Jews, which has given the world many a fine and lofty intellect. He had, moreover, none of the less edifying qualities of his race. He entirely lacked the Semitic instinct for accumulating wealth, and as a young man was so careless about money that during a great portion of his life he was worried to death. Though never a rich man, his generosity was sometimes quite quixotic. Happening to be taken ill while staying at a country house, the local doctor was sent for and came twice. On his return to London, Lord Beaconsfield's secretary, having reminded his chief of the fee, was told to send the practitioner ten guineas. " I dare say he doesn't get much practice down in the country I should like to do him a little good," was the old Tory leader's kindly remark. The acceptance of Lord Beaconsfield's leadership by the real English aristocracy was the more remark- able insomuch as he had not received the training which was then considered almost indispensable to an English statesman. Old Isaac Disraeli had not given him what is usually understood by the term " a liberal education " ; and his son was never reared in the Eton and Oxford of his favourite heroes, but was taken from the suburban academy, in which he had mastered some of the elements of learning, to be articled in the office of a metropolitan attorney. LORD BEACONSFIELD 45 When the young Disraeli first entered politics his somewhat flamboyant style of dress must have pre- judiced many people against him. His appearance and dandified air in the early days have often been described. His ringlets of silken black hair, his coat of black velvet lined with white satin, his white kid gloves, his ivory cane, of which the handle, inlaid with gold, was relieved by more black silk, in the shape of a tassel, must have all counted to his disad- vantage. Gradually, as the years crept on, all of these frip- peries were abandoned, and when as a boy he shook hands with me for the last time in my mother's drawing-room, where he was such a frequent visitor, he wore, I remember, the most shocking overcoat possible, and was altogether very shabbily dressed. I shall never forget the old statesman's sphinx-like look and his half-closed eyes as he sat huddled up in a little chair. There was something fascinating about him, and one felt that he was some one entirely different from ordinary men. A real political leader, if ever there was one, Lord Beaconsfield, at a time when the Conservative party possessed a far greater number of shrewd and virile captains than it does to-day, absolutely dominated his party, not by overbearing methods or temper, but by tact. Those who worked with him like his intimate friends, still cherish his memory with the warmest affection. My cousin (Lord Abergavenny), indeed, only a short time ago, speaking to me of his dear 46 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Dizzy, said : " Ah ! there was the most charming man to work with I ever knew. If he disagreed with you, he put things so nicely that you could not be annoyed. He was the most tolerant and most pleasant of men." I have always heard the same story from people, and I have known a good number, who were in close touch with the great statesman. The lapse of years since his death has not shaken his admirers in their ardent enthusiasm for their lost leader, and it is easy to realize the strange, almost mysterious, influence which Dizzy exercised over many contemporaries who had never even caught a glimpse of him. Many, indeed, like myself, who belong to a later generation and have a profound distrust of all politicians, even now grow enthusiastic concerning the genius of the wonderful man who, starting with everything against him, lived to become Benjamin Disraeli, first and only Earl of Beaconsfield. The brilliant personal triumph which Dizzy achieved reflected its lustre upon his political followers. Naturally, therefore, when he departed the whole fabric was shaken, and to-day Conservatism as a serious fighting force has almost ceased to exist. Within recent years the Unionist party has been peculiarly unfortunate. To begin with, it seems to have no clear or settled policy, while the old-fashioned sturdy solidity which was once one of its principal characteristics is a thing of the past. This state of affairs, however, will not be bettered by a policy of shuffle and retreat. To have the best chance of rising once more NEW AND OLD 47 Phoenix-like from its ashes the Conservative party must first of all perfect its organization and also hold out more tempting inducements for young men to join its ranks. In this it would merely be follow- ing the example of Lord Beaconsfield, who spared no pains to win over promising young men. Disraeli was a man of commanding genius, who by an accident found himself at the head of the Conservative party, but he himself was something more than a hidebound Tory. Nevertheless, it is to the credit of the old Conservatives that, conscious of their own limitations, they accepted the leadership of the cleverest man they could find. On the other hand, their successors of to-day are inspired by a disastrous loyalty to leaders who, owing to various causes, have ceased to be in touch with modern needs. What wonder that the country, unmoved by second-rate Unionist blandishments, trusts itself to the Liberals, not because it likes them or admires them, but because, of two evils, it prefers the evil which, rightly or wrongly, it considers the less? The uncompromising attitude of the old-fashioned Conservatives is said to be out of date at any rate it served the cause far better than compromise and would-be artful tactics have served the new school. The Unionists, indeed, when it comes to a question of superior cunning or adroit falsification of fact, are no match for their more wily opponents of " Chinese labour " fame. A more shameless cry than this never disgraced 48 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS any political party ; even Mr. Gladstone (who generally managed to convince himself of the justice of anything he advocated, however doubtful) would have recoiled at such a deliberate falsification of the truth. The fact that many high-minded and sincere Liberals connived at this piece of chicanery shows what a demoralizing influence party politics exert. " Lies always come first in everything," and attract the imbecile by the law of universal vulgarity. The blind see the unknown, the incredulous believe the false. " Few are they who look to the inside of things, which are usually very different from what they seem. Alas, that Truth generally comes in only very late, limping along, as it were, on the arm of Time ! " This infamous Chinese labour cry was undoubtedly one of the greatest factors in the Liberal triumph of 1906, yet we find Mr. Lloyd George having the face to tell his countrymen at Aberystwyth May 25, 1912 that "In politics, lying might be a good gamble, but it was a bad investment. On the Stock Exchange they had people who were called Bears, and their function was to run down a security, to circulate falsehoods about it, and then try to break it." On the market, " the only chance of making money," continued the Chancellor, "was to sell out before being found out." All things considered, the effrontery displayed in this oration was nothing short of stupendous. Mr. Lloyd George, however no man better knew MR. LLOYD GEORGE 49 exactly what would go down with the public he was addressing, Abuse of the leisured classes is always popular with a certain section of the proletariat, and whether as a chastiser of unearned increment or defending that " stainless honour " which Mr. Winston Churchill told the National Liberal Club was one of the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer's principal characteristics, Mr. Lloyd George in his own line, at least, is quite inimitable. No man better than he understands how 'to hold the attention of the electorate. When he is not amusing them with his quips, he moves them with his pathos. It is pretty certain that his having taken part in the late Ministerial gamble will do his career little harm. Voters always have a very short memory where anyone who flatters and amuses them is concerned. Quite recently the Chancellor of the Exchequer received a unanimous vote of sympathy at a recent political meeting passed I suppose as a mark of regret at the failure of the " Marconi gamble." There, as in many other instances, the "stormy petrel," as he called himself, was certainly " all at sea" ! With all his faults Mr. Lloyd George has at least the merit of being amusing in his speeches, most of which are readable enough to cause the press to report them almost in full; a compliment only accorded to one other speaker Lord Rosebery. The rise of the Chancellor is very much to his credit, and though he shows few signs of being a 50 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS really serious politician, he must possess some of the qualities which go to the making of a great man, for, otherwise, he would never have surmounted the many and great difficulties which have shadowed his path. At the present time the Chancellor has become almost a national institution, which even those opposed to him accept. It is, however, to be hoped that we shall not have any more politicians of his peculiar bent. One Lloyd George is all very well, but a House of Commons with several would be unbearable. The recent Marconi scandal is but a proof of how fallible such courtiers of the people as Messrs. Lloyd George, Isaacs, and Lord Murray of Elibank always are. We are told that in former times patriots prided themselves on two things their own poverty and the riches of the State. But, poor as these men were, there were kings not rich enough to purchase them nor powerful enough to intimidate them. In modern times it would be easier to find a patriot rich enough to buy a king than a king not rich enough to buy a patriot. A noble Roman is said to have torn to pieces with his own teeth a woodpecker, because the augur, being consulted, had replied that if the bird lived his house would flourish, but if it died the prosperity of the State would prevail. I wonder what some of our modern patriots would do under the same circumstances. I think a roast woodcock at the Savoy grill-room would be more to their taste than a raw woodpecker! CHARLES BRADLAUGH 51 There are two trades, a friend once told a member of the Cabinet, which seem to be inevitably connected with deterioration of character. Horse-dealing is one, and you know all about the other ! The superiority of the Liberals in thoroughly bamboozling the electorate is almost an admitted fact. The Conservatives, no doubt, though they have some scruples, are almost as anxious to do it, but unfortunately for them they have not the brains. Their attitude in the Marconi affair proved this. Besides wearing the subject to death, the Opposition assumed a self-righteous attitude which at times became little short of ridiculous. As was pertinently remarked, the British public were regaled with the spectacle of the Conservatives pretending to be shocked at speculations which many of them in their innermost hearts thought of no con- sequence at all, while, on the other hand, a number of austere Radicals, who really disapproved, found them- selves obliged to condone, if not actually defend, Stock Exchange gambling. The tone adopted by the Unionist party with regard to the whole affair was not dissimilar from that once taken up by the late Sir Henry Drum- mond Wolff. The latter, though no bigot in religious matters, sought to make party capital by opposing the taking of the oath by Charles Bradlaugh, a man who, notwithstanding his aggressive atheism, was one of the most high-minded and sincere indi- viduals who ever lived. A strange compound of good and evil, poor Brad- 52 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS laugh was really a good Christian, though he was the last to know it. He did good without knowing why, and practised all the virtues of religion, at the same time he continually attacked its doctrines and called all its advocates impostors. It might have been said of him, as the satirist said of one who was always railing at everything good, kind, and beneficent " His honest features the disguise defy, And his face loudly gives his tongue the lie." Being by disposition hostile to dogma, Bradlaugh wasted a good deal of time combating religious dogma and faith. The great Akbar wrote : " In every temple they seek Thee, in every language they praise Thee. Each religion says that it holds Thee the One. " But it is Thee whom I seek from temple to temple, for Heresy and Orthodoxy stand not behind the screen of Truth." Perhaps the Member for Northampton was closer to the latter than many professed believers. Well might John Bright exclaim, " It is not Bradlaugh's atheism which they hate, but his un- conscious Christianity." Sir Henry Drummond Wolff, to whom I acted as attache" in Teheran and Madrid, and who was through his mother a cousin of mine, was a most generous and good-hearted man, not at all fanatically fond of religion, narrow-minded, or bigoted in any way. An excellent raconteur, he justly enjoyed a great A NOBLE SPEECH 53 reputation for telling amusing stories of a frivolous kind, many of which would certainly not have been to the taste of the Bench of Bishops. Yet here was this tolerant and kindly man who, had he met Mr. Brad- laugh outside political life, would no doubt, like most sensible people, have appreciated and liked his many good qualities doing everything he could to put the newly elected Member for Northampton to unlimited trouble and expense. Religious conviction or detestation of Mr. Brad- laugh's unorthodox views did not, in my opinion and I knew Sir Henry as well as anyone have the slightest share in causing the latter to pursue his relentless and ultimately futile opposition to the Member for Northampton taking his seat. It was during one of the Bradlaugh debates that Mr. Gladstone made a speech which must endear his memory to all who admire toleration in its best and most difficult form. Nothing is more honourable to his reputation than his masterly plea for one whose religious opinions were in direct opposition to his own. Mr. Glad- stone was without doubt a really religious man, and nothing could have been more painful to him than to find himself even indirectly identified with atheism. According to his lights, however, he was strictly just, and feeling it was his duty to speak, he spoke. All honour to him for having done so. The trumped-up and insincere opposition to Bradlaugh and the " Marconi affair " are the two 54 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS salient instances of the pitch which demoralization has reached in modern parliamentary life. The House of Commons, indeed, has now long ceased to be a place for a man of sturdy and indepen- dent views. Such a one is not wanted in this nest of catchpenny intrigue and pitiful evasion. Were it otherwise, Mr. Harold Cox would not be without a seat. He, at any rate, comes in for no share of that growing contempt which most of our politicians so richly deserve. It is, at all events, some consolation to reflect that no class of men becomes so completely forgotten after their deaths as politicians, while their speeches, like out-of-date theological literature, are only dragged out of obscurity to light fires or to be made into pulp. The country is rapidly becoming disgusted with the humbug and trickery of the party system, while thoroughly tired of the House of Commons, its super- abundant legislation and make-believe ways. No wonder that recently when the House rose for five months a psean of joy went up from all sensible people, most of whom sighed to think this home of futile talk could not be shut up for ten years. The Government (some of the members of which are really clever men, who, if unhampered by the House of Commons, would govern the country well enough) are obliged to keep on pushing forward un- necessary measures in order to satisfy their supporters. The Opposition is in a still worse plight, having no policy and acute differences in its ranks. In 1885 an acute observer declared that the great PARALYSIS AND IMPOTENCE 55 fact in the political situation in England was that the party system which underlay political life for three centuries had broken down. " Its machinery," said he, " is exhausted or hopelessly out of repair. Its energies are distracted. What was once a whole is split up into fractions and sects, which reduce each other to paralysis and impotence." This may have been partially true then, it is certainly wholly true now. Particularly impotent is the Unionist party. The main hope of the Unionists is based upon an idea that the country will eventually become sufficiently disgusted with the present Government to put them in office, but what on earth they are going to do when they get there it is increasingly difficult to divine. The repeal of the Parliament Act and drastic im- provement of Mr. Lloyd George's insurance scheme will, we are assured, form important features of the Unionist programme. One Government, however, very rarely reverses anything which its predecessor has done, and in all probability the advent of the Unionists to power would find them too much oc- cupied with minor legislative tinkerings, bickerings as to Tariff Reform and the like, to effect any serious change in the Acts which they profess to hate. The late Lord Salisbury was undoubtedly a source of enormous strength to the class to which he belonged; the methods of the clever Cecil family have not been equally successful. Certain of Lord Salisbury's off- spring, indeed, whilst endowed with brilliant mental gifts, often seem to be all at sea in the modern world. 56 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Lord Robert's keenness for Woman's Suffrage actually caused him to join in the most un-English demand for names in the highly discreditable agitation concerning the Piccadilly flat. Lord Hugh's energies are cramped by the influence of an ecclesiasticism which is unsuited to the needs and ideas of the present age. From a certain point of view, no doubt, the fact that this is so is to be deplored ; but politicians, to exercise real influence, must, to a great extent, swim with the tide. On the other hand, a pernicious influence in modern politics is that exercised by extreme timidity. "La peur accroit les maux : si I' on ne sttait pas si fort effrayt des menaces, on eut pu resister avec un certain succes" This particularly applies to the Unionist party, a section of which is always trying to show the electorate how anxious it is to yield to any passing whim, and goes poking about to discover some scrap of meddle- some social reform overlooked or rejected by the Radicals. Many a voter, I feel sure, would willingly vote for a real Conservative party, but there is at present none for the poor fellow to vote for, and so, not from any admiration for Radical principles, but preferring the lesser of two evils, in despair he is forced into supporting the other side. Ill BOHEMIA IT is all very well to say, as the late Sir Walter Besant said of Murger, the author of the " Vie de Boheme," that the life of a true Bohemian is usually sad, mistaken in its aims, bankrupt in its aspirations, ruined by its follies. Without some sympathy for Bohemianism man is a dull dog indeed. In addition to this, those whose youth is austere can seldom or ever understand humanity and make allowances for its faults and failings. A century ago and later, even great statesmen made occasional incursions into the land of Bohemia, and the youth of the governing classes, as a rule, were thoroughly acquainted with all its ways. Those, of course, were rough days, and the expe- rience gained in queer resorts produced a very different sort of Englishman from the one, we see to-day. An instance of the stern point of view taken up by the old school was the remark of the second of a certain duellist, who, after killing his man, began to express sorrow. " Sorrow indeed ! For what ? " rapped out the 58 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS fire-eater in question. " Damme ! you shot him like a gentleman, and there's an end on't. What the devil do you want ? You can't kill him again ! " Though in point of time we are not very far away from the earlier part of the nineteenth century, it is difficult to estimate the change in manners and habits which since that period has occurred. Men of fashion delighted in paying nocturnal visits to St. Giles's, where the knives and forks were chained to the table, and for twopence you could have a plate of hot ox-cheek, a tumbler of small beer, and a platter of Basilican salve. The buck or dandy, who formerly was a recognized figure in West End life, has dis- appeared, and the days of wild sprees, knocker-wrench- ing, and the like do not seem likely to return. Though the Corinthian of the last days of the Regency belonged to a leisured class which was little concerned with the question of having to earn its own living, he was usually a virile, full-blooded specimen of robust manhood, in reality far superior to the dandy of Victorian times or the " nut " of to-day, too often mere languid poseurs of the " nil admirari " order. The "nut," moreover, unlike the dandy of the sixties, takes a pride in appearing to be cunning and cute. The best description of his ideals, curiously enough, is that given by Byron in Canto XI of " Don Juan " : "Who, on a lark, with black-eyed Sal (his blowing), So prime, so swell, so nutty, and so knowing ? " Though he had a number of good qualities unknown to his successors, the buck of the past had some A BIBULOUS GENERATION 59 very bad ones the worst, his .fondness for consuming large quantities of strong liquor. Intemperance was more or less rife among all classes, and from 1770 to about 1820, not only men about town, but people in highly responsible positions habitually drank deep. Certain judges were noted for their potations. Of the drinking judges of the day, Lord Hermand was the most famous. "A case of some great offence was tried before him, and the counsel pleaded extenuation for his client in that he was drunk when he committed the offence. ' Drunk ! ' exclaimed Lord Hermand, in great indignation ; ' if he could do such a thing when he was drunk, what might he not have done when he was sober ? ' evidently implying that the normal condition of human nature, and its most hopeful one, .was a condition of intoxication." The amount of drink swallowed by this bibulous generation was amazing, and there was a regular cult of articles connected with the consumption of alcohol. A punchbowl was once considered an article of furniture necessary to the humblest household. It was usually given as a present to young people on their marriage ; and the punchbowl with the ladle, with a guinea fixed in the bottom of it, were generally the most cherished of the Lares and Penates of our great-grandfathers. In Dissenters' families the punchbowl was frequently used as a kind of baptismal font. There are some bowls 60 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS which have acquired a rare value from their historic reminiscences. The original receipt for punch is said to have been brought back by a traveller from the Coro- mandel coast some two hundred and fifty years ago. "Punch" (which he is supposed to have declared was the favourite tipple of the inhabitants of this region) had obtained its name from " paunch," a word in their language meaning five the number of the ingredients of which it was compounded. These five component parts of punch were spirits, water, lemon, sugar, and spice ; but we have now reduced the elements to four by leaving out the spice. Thus we have, as one poet suggests, " four striking opposites the strong, the weak, the sour, the sweet." The basis of properly made punch is spring water (hot or cold, as the season may incline the taste of the company), to which is added lime or lemon juice and sugar, thus forming a kind of sherbet. The spirit, which may be either brandy, whisky, rum, or arrack, is then poured in, and the liquor becomes punch. When lemon juice is used instead of lime juice, it is called punch royal ; and, whatever may be the value of the statement, it is said to be less liable to affect the head as well as more grateful to the stomach. Milk punch is made by adding nearly as much milk to the sherbet as there is water. Some prefer tea punch, in which a decoction of green tea takes the place of water. There is a punch called chambermaid's punch (though why so named no one seems to know) which is THE MISPLACED H 61 made, without water, of lime juice sharpened with a little orange and lemon juice, twice as much white wine as lemon juice, and four times as much brandy, sugar being added to the taste. The large amount of spirituous refreshment consumed by a long past generation would seem to have made it choleric and quick to resent a slight by the display of physical violence. Fighting with watchmen or, indeed, no matter who, was at one time considered almost a legitimate form of amusement for a young fellow of spirit. The old-fashioned Englishman was rather blood- thirsty ; it used to be said that when he got up on a fine day his first idea was to go out and kill some- thing. At the present time it could, with more justice, be said that his first idea is to go out and reform somebody. In the early part of the nineteenth century every young buck prided himself upon being able to hold his own with his fists, handle the ribbons of a four-in-hand, and talk slang as glibly as a professional coachman. London slang, indeed, had quite a literature of its own, and the public delighted in imaginary characters who, like that creation of a later age, Sam Weller, had a peculiar pronunciation of the King's English. Perhaps the best instance of the habit of misplacing the h was a conversation supposed to have been held at the Zoological Gardens : Young Lady: "La, ma, here's a heagle!" 62 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Mama (reproachfully) : "A heagle ! Oh, you hignorant gal. Vy, it's a howl." Keeper of the Menagerie (respectfully) : " Axes parding, mum, it's an 'awk ! " The bucks, while they pronounced their #s, never- theless delighted in speaking a sort of special language of their own, the best professor of which may be said to have been a writer with a fine typi- cally English name. This was Pierce Egan, who enriched it with many amusing terms. He was a clever man, and some of his happiest efforts betray a strength of sense, and an inclination to support honour and correct feelings which show him to have been something more than a mere frivolous man of pleasure. Not a few of his writings are replete with gaiety information, and spirit ; and there are few authors who have made social history the vehicle of so much life and whim. Personally he is said to have been an intelligent man in conversation, as well as a pleasant singer in his day a gift highly esteemed. Singing and health-drinking were then important features on all convivial occasions. About the last instance, of a regular old-fashioned function of this sort, with songs and special toasts, was the traditional Cambridge Beefsteak Club dinner, to which the members sat down in blue coats, brass buttons, and buff waistcoats. The president always sang a song composed, I believe, early in the eighteenth century. In addition to much health drinking, there were four regular toasts, the newest MUND1G 63 of which was the health of Mr. Bowes, the only undergraduate who ever won the Derby. When drinking this in my Cambridge days I was not aware that I was toasting the defeat of my own grandfather, who lost a large sum of money by the defeat of his horse, the Angelica colt, beaten by half a neck -as the old-fashioned term ran in the Derby of 1835 by Mr. Bowes's horse Miindig. As Mlindig is a German word signifying " of age," the owner was probably just about twenty-one at the time. In after life he became a great collector of Oriental china. As a picture of the life led by a man of fashion in the early part of the nineteenth century " Tom and Jerry" is no doubt somewhat overdrawn, but the spirit of life is .there. Pierce Egan knew all the haunts of pleasure of his day, and was especially at home in Bohemian circles. In the chronicles of the life about town of his day there is a deal of matter for the student of social development. People were more simple and credu- lous, there was a strong hankering for physical violence and a decided predilection for noise. On the whole, however, the populace were much the same as they are now, but there was more coarseness, more massiveness, and less grace. Brutality to animals was viewed with unconcern. London abounded with low haunts devoted to all kinds of spurious and cruel sports. This taste spread across the Channel. For the convenience of bucks 64 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS visiting Paris a regular arena was installed on the Barriere du Combat, a picture of which appears in another "Tom and Jerry" book describing life in Paris. A regular performance, known as " Le Combat des Animaux," was held on Sundays, Mondays, and fete- days. The brutal show, such as it was, took place in an enclosure, round which was a gallery, and under it dens of beasts, together with a kennel of dogs, who were always ready for battle. Wolves, bulls, and bears, the latter with their teeth filed down, encountered trained dogs ; but the latter seldom killed their opponents, as amusement, not destruction, instigated the combats. The bulls had their horns sawn off. There were also fireworks exhibited, in which was to be seen a bull-dog, raised fifty feet by a rope, which he held between his teeth, regardless of the flames which surrounded him. The spectacle commenced at three to four o'clock, and the admission was i fr. and 2 fr. "Tom and Jerry" has attracted many who would have loathed taking part in most of the scenes it describes. Thackeray confessed that he always re- tained a great liking for the book, and especially the pictures. The costumes of the period, as was demonstrated in Sir Conan Doyle's excellent play, " The House of Temperley," were certainly very picturesque as compared with the sad-coloured clothes of to-day. The popularity of "Tom and Jerry" was quite phenomenal, and the result was that all sorts of other volumes in the same style were offered to SIMON PURE 65 the public. An extra series of twenty-three addi- tional coloured plates, with descriptive verses by Heath, are occasionally, or rather very rarely, found with the first edition. These extra plates, it is probable, were designed by Robert Cruikshank, whose portrait, as well as that of Pierce Egan (depicted as Bob Logic the Oxonian), is to be found in many of the scenes. The twenty-three plates in question, with the title "Fashion or Folly, or the Buck's Pilgrimage," were published separately, however, in 1832. They now command a considerable price. Another very scarce Tom and Jerry pamphlet is " Death of Life in London, or Tom and Jerry's Funeral," by T. Greenwood, published by Lowndes without date. It is embellished with a coloured fold- ing front by George Cruikshank. In connexion with the latter artist an amusing error was formerly to be found in an early edition of that famous work, " Nagler's Kunstler Lexicon." An English review had some time before contrasted the merits of the famous caricaturist with those of his brother Robert. In the course of this article George had been alluded to as "the real' Simon Pure." Unaware of the real significance of a quotation which has become proverbial amongst us, the German editor of that edition of the " Kunstler Lexicon " began his memoir of Cruikshank by gravely informing the public that he was an English artist "whose real name was Simon Pure"! In another part of the Lexicon, under the letter P, was to be found: 66 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS " PURE (SIMON), the real name of the celebrated caricaturist, George Cruikshank." " Tom and Jerry's Funeral " must, of course, not be confused with the " Finish to the Adventures of Tom, Jerry, and Logic," by Pierce Egan, published in 1830, of which there are two good reprints (1869 and 1887). In this volume we see the end of Corinthian Tom, killed by a fall out hunting, and the retirement from life in London of Jerry Hawthorn, after taking unto himself a blooming squire's daughter as wife. " Life in Paris," comprising the Rambles, Sprees, and Amours of Dick Wildfire, Squire Jenkins, and Captain O'Shuffleton in the French metropolis, with twenty-one comic vignettes and twenty-one coloured engravings of scenes from real life, by George Cruikshank, written by D. Carey and pub- lished in 1822, is now a scarce work of which no reprint has appeared. The coloured plates, spirited and well done, undoubtedly convey a good idea of a certain side of life in the French capital during the early part of the nineteenth century. The letter- press, whilst of course tinged by the " we show vice in order to induce virtue " pose a rather canting spirit, by the by is at times amusing as well as not uninstructive to the reader fond of delving into the more trivial ways and customs of an epoch now as remote from us as that of the ancient Assyrians. Another less-known volume written in the same style as "Tom and Jerry" was "Life in Dublin," MIDDLEMEN 67 which includes an account of the landing of George IV when he visited Ireland. The place of Logic who, by the way, Pierce Egan drew more or less as a picture of himself is here occupied by a somewhat impecunious officer who does not possess the charm of the Oxonian. This same visit of George IV produced a consider- able stir among certain agents then known as " middlemen," who had a free hand in the manage- ment of properties owned by absentee landlords, some of whom chose the occasion to pay one of their rare visits to their Irish domain. The harvest some of these " middlemen " reaped is even now legendary in those parts of the country where they had power to oppress. One great landowner about to visit Ireland to welcome King George IV desired his middleman to put his castle in order for his reception. " My lord," was the reply, " I burned it down twenty years ago as the readiest way to come at the lead which covered it, thinking your lordship, after a thirty years' absence, would never come here alive to look for a resting-place." By the tenant " the middleman " was too often regarded as a sort of rapscallion placed between his landlord and himself, merely for purposes of oppression. Not a few, it is true, were intolerable extortioners and tyrants, who stuck at nothing to gain money ; they kept hounds, and assumed an authority far superior to the law, their employer, the real landed proprietor, being very seldom accessible for purposes of appeal. A conspicuous instance was 68 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS the Earl of Bristol, Bishop of Londonderry, who held that office during a long life, and spent the revenues of his bishopric and estates in Italy. Dublin produced its own contribution to " Tom and Jerry " literature. In 1822 was published there " Tom and Jerry ; or, Life in London ; with a Copious Vocabulary of Flash and Cant." This has a coloured frontispiece. Other similar publications were : " Corinthian Parodies, by Tom, Jerry, and Logic, illustrative of Life in London." Published in 1823. With a folding coloured frontispiece by J. R. Cruikshank." " Real Life in London ; or, The Rambles and Adventures of Bob Tallyho, Esq." This is generally attributed to Pierce Egan. First edition, 2 vols., 1821-2, 8vo. Originally published in fourteen parts in pink pictorial wrappers, afterwards in pictorial boards as above. Some copies on large paper. Vol. i. has nineteen coloured plates (in- clusive of frontispiece and title). Vol. ii., thirteen coloured plates (inclusive of frontispiece and title), by Heath, Alken, Rowlandson, and others. " Doings in London ; or, Day and Night Scenes of the Frauds, Frolics, Manners, and Depravities of the Metropolis," by George Smeeton, 1828. This volume, which was republished in 1840, contains thirty-three plates after R. Cruikshank. >> Lowndes published a number of burlesques (now scarce) founded upon " Tom and Jerry." The most worthy of attention is " Tom and Jerry ; or, Life in TOM AND JERRY 69 London ; an entirely new Whimsical, Local, Melo- dramatic, Pantomimical, Equestrian Drama, in Three Acts, entitled ' Life in London,' by Pierce Egan. . . . As performed at Davis's Royal Amphitheatre, London" (1822). It cost a shilling, and had one coloured print. A play was founded upon the adventures of the two heroes, and after having had a great success in London, was played all over the British Isles. In Dublin, where it ran for more than fifty nights, an amusing incident occurred. In the part of Corinthian Tom, Barry wore Russian duck trousers, originally white, which, however, as the run went on, began to assume rather a dusky appearance, indicating their innocence of soap and water. At last, when those long-enduring duck trousers made their appear- ance about the twentieth night, encasing Barry's legs as if they grew there and were never to undergo a change (" sea-change," fresh-water, or other), one of Barry's persecutors cried out to him in the gallery : " Whist, Barry, you divil ! " " What do ye want, ye blackguard ? " said Barry, nothing moved by a style of address with which he was perfectly familiar. " Wait till I whisper to you," said the voice. All the house was silent. " When did your ducks take the water last ? " The audience roared with laughter for several minutes, and Barry, for the first time in his life, was beat by the gallery. The popularity which the Rambles and Sprees of Tom and Jerry obtained in England very soon made 70 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS its way across the Channel, where it became the topic of general conversation ; nay, it crept so much into favour with the gay folks of Paris that " Life in London " was speedily translated into French, and the translation had a most extensive circulation in France. The French version of " Life in London," published by Thierry, is entitled " Le Diorama Anglais, ou Promenades Pittoresques a Londres," 8vo. The vast popularity of this sort of literature abated with the dawn of the Victorian Age ; nevertheless, reprints of various " Tom and Jerry " books attest that the popularity of this sort of book has not entirely waned. Modern imitations of Pierce Egan's masterpiece have also been attempted at intermittent periods. By far the best of these was a cleverly written skit which appeared in Punch some two-score, years ago. For several weeks readers of the London Charivari were entertained with the rambles of Tom and Jerry and Logic around the metropolitan haunts which had taken the place of those popular in their own day. The writer of the skit in question, which was admirably illustrated, was peculiarly successful in catching Pierce Egan's style ; the whole thing was very clever and amusing. Since those days many of the resorts visited by the resuscitated Corinthians have become as obsolete as Tom Cribb's parlour, Cannot Mr. Owen Seaman, who, to the delight of THE FINISH 71 many, has put new life into Mr. Punch, persuade the gallant trio to pay another visit to modern London ? I am sure their views of modern customs and ways would make most amusing reading. Between 1820 and 1840 a great revolution took place in social manners and customs. The advent of that commercialism which is so triumphant to-day was fatal to the Corinthian spirit. Taste became less coarse, if less robust, and gradu- ally, in many old houses owned by bucks long grown old, the sporting pictures so much admired by a rougher generation were sent down to the steward's to make way for some modern gewgaws, groups of opera- dancers, Italian Venuses, and half- naked waltzers. To the horror of the old school the sporting motto of " May those who protect game never want it " was often removed to make way for some frivolous work of art. The flash kens and prize-fighters' haunts began to be cleared away. The last of the Covent Garden night-taverns, the noted " Finish," kept by Mrs. Butler upon the south side of the market sheds, ceased to exist in 1829. Up to comparatively recent times, however, it was not unusual for young fellows about town, who had been up all night at Bohemian clubs or at a fancy ball, to go and obtain refreshment at one of the hostelries which formerly had special permission to open early for the convenience of market porters and others. This, no doubt, like a similar fancy for breakfasting after a late night at a cabman's shelter 72 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS (now, I understand, strictly prohibited), was merely a survival of Tom and Jerry traditions. " Life in London," as pictured by Pierce Egan, really came to an end with the creation of the modern police force by Sir Robert Peel. Rows with the wheezy and rather disreputable old watchmen seldom entailed any serious consequences or loss of social prestige, but coming into conflict with the new police was an entirely different matter. Also the tolerance which condoned almost any kind of exuberance manifested by hot-blooded patri- cian youth was going out of fashion ; the West End was ceasing to be the special playground of the aris- tocracy, whose former almost unlimited licence to do as they pleased was being gradually but surely curtailed. A less brutal if less robust tone was beginning to pervade all classes, which recoiled at many of their ancestors' rougher ways. Old bucks in vain complained that the age was too refined. The spirit of progress was against them, and some of the new generation even dared to hint that a gentleman who only took a delight in the style of his team and in the "rattling of the bars " was nothing but a rough, unaccomplished clown. Gradually the Corinthian ceased to have any prestige. The Champagne Charley of the mid-Victorian era could not be compared to his predecessor, the patri- cian hero whom Pierce Egan had described ; and with the disappearance of the night-houses in the early seventies, larks and sprees ceased to be con- sidered good form. THE SHERIDAN CLUB 73 Something of the Tom and Jerry spirit, however, lingered on much later than this, and hot-blooded young men about town as late as the early eighties would occasionally invade supper places with the deliberate intention of provoking a fight. I have seen a wild young fellow, out for what he thought a lark, hurl a chair into the middle of a room full of people at supper, and afterwards engage in a spirited bout of fisticuffs with the officials who tried to turn him out. Though the well-to-do classes have given up knocker-wrenching and the like, some equivalent of this most silly and undesirable form of horseplay is still thought great fun by the modern hooligan. Fun and frolic, however, are not extinct. It is, I believe, more or less an error to think that the ways of the present are very different from those of the past. People who lead quiet, regular lives are always imagining and declaring that the wild ways of a former generation have for ever passed away. This may possibly be the case to-day, but it certainly was not so a few years ago in Dublin, where at the now defunct Sheridan Club scenes and incidents very similar to those so amusingly described by Irish novelists of the past constantly took place. I never remember having seen anything like this institution anywhere else. Within its hospitable walls all sorts of jokes and hoaxes were carried out by members full of Celtic vivacity and humour, amongst whom, of course, one of the proprietors, the late Charles Barrington affec- 74 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS tionately known as C. B., himself in many ways a most gifted man was easily first. It was difficult to be dull in the company of this joyous spirit full of originality and wit. At the "Sheridan," as late as the eighties of the last century, could be seen phases of the Irish life pictured in the pages of " Charles O'Malley," " Harry Lorrequer," and other of Lever's enlivening books. Its membership then comprised a number of real characters, some rich, some poor, but all of them more or less bent upon pulling the devil by the tail and having a good time ; and a good time most of them certainly had. Except to attend race-meetings, however, few of the frequenters went far afield. The Continent appealed to them but little. " What struck you most, Tim, in Paris and Rome ? " a certain newly returned member was asked. " Statues of soldiers and generals Caesar and Napoleon, Napoleon and Caesar, but I didn't see a statue of ," naming a well-known whisky distiller. " Why the devil should you have done so?" "Sure," came back the apt reply, " you'll not be denying that he's killed more men than the lot of them." The Club was full of unconventional members, whose escapades and eccentricities were typically Hibernian. One of these had a small streamlet running through his domain into a fine bay about two miles away. Ambitious to have a yacht built from the timber off his own ground, he consulted an Irish country ship- 36,000 OVERDRAWN! 75 builder upon the best mode of doing it on a certain spot. The thing was soon arranged, a ship laid upon the edge of the brook, and a vessel begun and finished in less than a year ; but, behold ! when the time for launching the newly built craft into the river came, it was found the vessel drew five feet of water, and there was only one in the river. The gentleman reproached the architect for deceiving him : " It's sorry I am," said the old ship-cooper ; "had you ordered me to build a ship upon the Sugarloaf Mountain I'd have done it; but as to water for floating her in, sure that was none of my business, but rested with God Almighty and yourself to look after." The yacht was converted into a summer-house. Many queer tales of Irish landlords were to be heard at the " Sheridan." Some of the ideas of this class as to financial matters were very curious. One old peer, who went bankrupt, persisted in tracing all his misfortunes to a certain bank manager who had been instrumental in causing his cheques to be stopped, merely because he was some .36,000 overdrawn. " Of course I brought an action against the bank," said his lordship, " but that rascally manager, who drove me into the hands of the moneylenders, must have got at the jury, for I lost my case." Nothing would ever soften this old peer's anger against the manager in question, who, as some of his friends frankly told him, had in reality acted as his best friend. 76 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS One of the most remarkable characters at the " Sheridan " was a member who was well known for never rising from lunch till seven in the evening. At the age of eighty this Irishman of the old school stood (and was elected) for Parliament, the reason he gave for seeking election being that " a little change of whisky might suit him." C. B. was at his best when expatiating to a visitor on the attainments and merits of his fellow-members. He never failed to point out a Mr. Rooney, who, he would declare, had played whist thirty-five years and had never yet been known to make a mistake. Another great whist - player was Mr. Bennett Little, a clever, well-read man, whose knowledge of Shakespeare has probably never been equalled. It used to be said that there was no line of any of Shakespeare's plays to which, if quoted, he could not quote the next. Unlike his friend C. B., who even at whist was a bit of a gambler, Mr. Little played for the love of the game. The latter, who was a convert to Buddhism, was a highly cultured man in many fields of knowledge ; indeed, there was no subject as to which he was not well informed a proof of which was given one evening at the Rotunda. During the interval in a great boxing tournament got up there by the Trinity College students, C. B., who was unknown to most of those present, rose to his feet and in his best oratorical manner said, " Gentlemen, we have seen a wonderful exposition of the ' noble art.' I think it right to let you know, however, that there is among us here CAPTAIN MACHELL 77 to-night one who being the most wonderful pugilist in the world, is ready to take on all comers." This was followed by loud cries of "Name!" from the students and other excited youths. " Since you ask for his name," continued C. B., " I shall give it ; I refer to my friend Mr. Bennett Little." The latter, who was no boxer, being well used to C. B.'s ways, was not at all disconcerted by the loud cries of " Speech ! " which followed. Getting on to his legs, he told the audience that though unused to fighting, he knew something of the history of the " noble art," the development of which, from the days of ancient Greece and Rome down to those of Sayers and Heenan, he traced with such consummate cleverness that while his address lasted you could have heard a pin drop. The Sheridan Club was originally started by the late Colonel McCalmont and Mr. Barrington. At first it was located in Harcourt Street, from which it was moved to a house on Stephen's Green. In a way the Sheridan took the place of the old-fashioned hotels which had been social centres for sporting men coming up to Dublin for business or pleasure. The Sheridan, however, was a meeting-place for Irishmen from all parts of the country, whereas each of the old hostelries used to have a clientele drawn from a particular district from Limerick, Galway, and the like. Bilton's Hotel enjoyed great popularity in its day, as did Mappin's. It was here that the late Captain Machell, for a bet, performed the wonderful feat 78 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS of jumping on to an old-fashioned high narrow mantelpiece. During race-meetings there was at times a good deal of gambling. I still see in my mind's eye a certain sporting character, noted for his knowledge of horse- flesh, from a somewhat remote part of Ireland. Sitting down to take a baccarat bank, he produced from his capacious pockets two bags filled with gold, almost exactly resembling those pictured by Cruikshank in one of his famous illustrations to Harrison Ainsworth's " Miser's Daughter." On such evenings as there was play the room was usually filled with a crowd of high- spirited and amusing Irishmen, apt at witticism and repartee ; the scene was one which could have been witnessed nowhere else than in Ireland. Very often what seemed to the uninitiated visitor terrible rows used to occur. A good half of these rows, it should be added, were not quarrels at all, but merely hoaxes got up to take in other members, or more usually visitors. Supper, late at night or early in the morning, usually consisting of champagne and grilled bones, was a go-as-you-please entertainment, songs being often sung as only the Irish, with their inimitable gift of humour and pathos, can sing them. The old head waiter was a regular institution at the Sheridan and, as such, highly privileged. On one occasion, in the small hours of the morning, when the supper-table had been cleared for baccarat and the game was in full swing, one of the players having left the room for a few minutes, old "Richard," with the remark " that after waiting for forty years he NO BACCARAT! 79 didn't see why he shouldn't have some fun," sat down in the vacant place, and was only induced to get up by C. B. sternly exercising his authority and kicking him out of the room. Bad language was prohibited in the Sheridan, and a certain Major having aroused C. B.'s ire by swearing, the latter told the cashier to return the offender his subscription. The Major having gone off with the money, it suddenly struck C. B. to inquire whether the subscription had ever been paid. "Oh no, sir; not for five years!" was the reply. C. B. was off after the Major like a shot, caught him, and won all the subscriptions back at billiards. C. B. could never resist a good game of cards. This was never better exhibited than during one evening at the Sheridan when he himself took the lead in breaking his own rules. This happened at a period when a wave of Puri- tanism had swept over the club. The intermittent games of baccarat played there had attracted atten- tion, with the result that C. B., after a consultation with his co-proprietor, decided that the illegal game must be rigorously prohibited. Accordingly, on a certain evening members were surprised to see the club placarded with notices stating, "No baccarat allowed." A party of rather wild fellows, however, determined not to be beat by what they called a piece of damned nonsense, and, going upstairs, called for cards as usual. The steward, how- ever, refused to provide any packs, and, finding neither threats, entreaties, nor blandishments of any use, the 80 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS party adjourned to the whist-room, where C. B. and his co-proprietor were indulging in a quiet rubber. Here, at least they must be given cards, and, having obtained the required number of packs, the leader of the band sat down and said, " A pony in the bank." The co-proprietor of the club at once told him to stop, at the same time drawing C. B.'s atten- tion to the fact that in spite of the new regulations which he had so warmly supported baccarat was about to be played. " Monstrous!" said C. B. " I must see to this at once." Rising from the whist table with great dignity, he strode over to the lawbreakers and in a stern voice said, " What are you doing ? What's going on ? " " What's going on ? " replied the banker. " Why, there's fifty pounds in the bank." " Banco," said C. B., and, having lost, he continued to play, with the ultimate result that he did not leave the baccarat table till between seven and eight the next morning. His co-proprietor was furious with rage at all this, and determined to pay out C. B. for his laxness. Accordingly, when the old man at length did come downstairs, he found himself surrounded by several members, his colleague at their head. " Well, C. B.," they shouted, " you've had your bac- carat ; now you're going to have a Turkish bath." 11 Poor old C. B. never takes one," was the reply. " Never mind, he's going to this morning," shouted the crowd, and in due course C. B. was huddled into a four-wheeler and driven off to the baths, where, after A MYSTERIOUS BOTTLE 81 he had undressed, his companions, having hung him all over with his own placards, " No baccarat allowed," ran him round the place, one of their number flicking him with the cabman's whip, much to the sur- prise and consternation of the attendants. Poor old C. B. was much too tired to make any effectual protest. C. B., notwithstanding his constant complaints that he was a poor old man whom every one got the best of, was seldom caught napping. On one occasion, however, he was fairly served out. He himself delighted in telling the story. He had taken a shooting with a friend, and undertook to look after the housekeeping at their shooting lodge. Some good brown sherry formed part of the supplies which he laid in, a bottle always standing on the sideboard. After a week or so it was observed that even when no one had drunk any sherry the bottle in question was never more than two-thirds full. C. B. pointed this out to his friend, and said to him, "It's that rascally butler of mine. You see how I'll serve him out." He then took the bottle and having filled it up with slops, " I fancy one glass of that will settle him," said he, as he replaced it on the sideboard. One glass, however, did not seem to have " settled him," for at dinner the next evening the butler, a quiet and good servant, was just as calm as ever, while the bottle, as before, was only two-thirds full. Neither C. B. nor his friend could make it out, and finally, when dinner was over, they determined to 82 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS thrash the matter out. Accordingly they sent for the butler. "What have you been doing with the sherry?" demanded C. B. "The bottle was full this morning; we haven't touched a drop, and a third of it is gone." " Yes," said the butler, " I put three glasses in your soup. Ever since we came here I have done so. The cook makes such poor weak stuff, I thought it best to give it some flavour." The feelings of C. B. and his friend, who had unwittingly swallowed so much nastiness, may be imagined. C. B. possessed quite marvellous resource. No man better than he knew how to get out of an awkward predicament or scrape. One of the most striking proofs of this was the way in which he once avoided having a serious quarrel with an old friend. This gentleman, though none too well endowed with the world's goods, was, like C. B., very fond of an occasional game. One evening when baccarat was being played he began bidding for a bank, and eventually secured one for a hundred pounds. C. B., who was in the room, knowing that his friend could ill afford to risk such a sum, showed signs of strong disapproval, and during play went and stood behind the banker. When the latter had lost the first hundred pounds and said he would renew, C. B. became more and more anxious. Finally, after two more renewals, he could not restrain himself any longer, and abandoning all muttered admonitions said : C. B. WITHDRAWS 83 " Don't be a fool, old boy, you know very well you can't afford to lose so much." Upon this the banker, who was naturally sore from losing, turning round in his chair, told C. B. he was a liar. "Gentlemen," then said the latter, putting on his dignified air, " owing to the opprobrious term which has just been applied to me I shall withdraw." In the most solemn manner in the world he then went downstairs to the supper-room, where a heated dis- cussion as to the outrage took place between him and several sympathisers. Every one agreed that such an insult could never be atoned for, and matters seemed about to take a most serious turn. Half an hour later down came the banker with his friends, the party seating themselves at a table not very far away. They also discussed the affair, the offender and offended being close enough to hear what one another were saying. "He called me a liar before you all, before my friends I can never forgive such an insult," C. B. kept repeating. " What's the use of calling you a liar before your friends?" retorted the banker; "they know you're one." C. B. heard these words, but the rest of his party, who were engaged in earnest discussion, did not very well catch what had been said. C. B. noticed this, and quick as lightning said : "Very well, under the circumstances, I will accept 84 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS your apology." Though nothing of the sort had ever been offered, every one except C. B. and the man who had insulted him thought it had. With great dignity and betraying some signs of emotion, C. B. went and shook the latter by the hand, and the evening ended amidst general harmony and good fellowship. On the whole I do not think much harm was done by the gambling ; most of the players, indeed, were very wide awake and well able to take care of themselves. All sorts of tales were current as to the stratagems of certain wily spirits anxious to retire after a good run of luck. On one occasion an old and very popular gambler, having won about three hundred pounds at loo, was, to the consternation of his fellow-players, seen to reel in his chair and collapse upon the floor, his eyes closed and his limbs gave convulsive move- ments of a very alarming character. " Poor old chap ! after all he's died in harness," cried his fellow-players as they mournfully carried him out of the room. The sufferer, however, while being driven home seemed to rally slightly, but his fellow-players at least such as were strange to Dublin ways never expected to see him again. What, then, was their surprise upon 'a subsequent visit a month later to find the invalid, who, they believed, must either be paralysed for life or dead, sitting at the card table as blithe and vivacious as a boy of twenty. Once more they played loo with him and once more they lost. When he had A TERRIBLE HOAX 85 won something over two hundred and fifty pounds the alarming symptoms again supervened ; but this time a different mode of treatment was adopted. Betaking themselves to the lavatory, two of the most stalwart losers returned laden with enormous cans of cold water, which they poured over the prostrate and twitching form of the invalid till he was soused through and through from head to foot. At last, being able to stand it no longer, with the remark that he would change his clothes and go to bed, he got up and left the room with all the sang-froid in the world. In addition to being full of all sorts of original ways, C. B. was a rare sporting character of the old school. On one occasion, in company with another queer celebrity well known at the Sheridan (" Colorado " Hewson), he walked in evening dress and pumps nine miles within an appointed time, by doing which the pair won a considerable sum. This walk, it should be added, took place about two in the morning as the result of a wager laid the same evening at supper. " Colorado " Hewson obtained his nickname owing to having passed a certain time in America, where he had had many curious adventures, one of which, terrible if comic, was said to have turned his hair grey. While out prospecting and taken to see a mine, he was told to take great care in making a descent in a rough lift. Of a sudden his companions at the top shouted to him to clamber out and clutch hold of a bar he would find fixed to the rocks at the side. 86 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Something, they added, had gone wrong with the lift, which, to his horror, then swiftly flew up, all lights being extinguished. From the top of the shaft he now heard shouts urging him to hold on like grim death, for below him lay a chasm five hundred feet deep. Though constantly encouraged by shouts and cries, no help came. The tension of holding on with certain destruction beneath his feet, combined with the physical exhaustion of the effort, quite exhausted the poor man, and, after a considerable time, which seemed like eternity itself, yielding to fatigue he let go, resigned to drop into the jaws of death. He fell exactly a foot, the bottom of the shaft being, in reality, just beneath his feet. The mental strain engendered by this mischievous and cruel joke turned Hewson's hair grey. This adventure, which would have sobered many a weaker man, had had little effect upon a naturally genial disposition. Hewson, indeed, had many an amusing tale to tell of his adventures in America, where at one time, he declared, he had run a show, the financial ruin of which was brought about by the arrest of his principal attraction, " The Great Human Opticon," for debt. He had many stories of the shrewd ways of various people he had met in Colorado, a country, he said, where every man and boy was able to track an old hen ten miles over pebbles. Though a very amusing companion at social gather- ings, Hewson, who, as the old saying goes, "only THE FLOWER OF DUNBLANE 87 knew two tunes, one of which was ' God Save the Queen ' and the other wasn't," unlike C. B., had not a note of music in his composition. The musical evenings at the Sheridan were at one time one of the features of the place ; a great deal of talent was to be heard there. Colonel L' Estrange, as a singer and player, could not be beaten at the piano. When distinguished actors came to Dublin special suppers were organized for them. Irving and Toole were the most popular guests, the recitation of " Eugene Aram " by the former never failing to evoke tumultuous applause. Every one who was able was expected to sing or play at these entertain- ments, which were constantly enlivened by the songs of the late Mr. Bob Martin (" Ballyhooley ") and the recitations of Mr. Johnnie Parker, one of the most amusing members of the Sheridan a most original character with a wonderful memory and a good voice. His " Robinson Crusoe " was a thing never to forget. A wonder at singing and playing the piano was Jerry Perry, who, some declared, could beat all the world at a comic song no entertainment at the Sheridan was complete without him. C. B. himself was full of music, and had a very good, high baritone voice. It was worth going a long way to hear him sing " Jessie, the Flower of Dunblane." He possessed, in a great degree, that peculiarly Irish gift of humour and pathos which was one of the causes of his success as an after-dinner speaker. The talent at the Sheridan evenings was, as a rule 88 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS entirely amateur. On one occasion, however, C. B., having invited a number of officers of the Scots Guards to dinner, told them that Captain Kelly, of the " Roscommon Fusiliers," was going to drop in later. About 9.30 the gallant officer in question arrived, and vastly entertained every one by his excellent playing of the banjo. All the officers declared the captain was a most amusing man and capital fellow. As a matter of fact, C. B. told them the next day he was no captain at all, but a man who had been hired from the Grafton Varieties a Dublin music-hall of that day. C. B. was an excellent sportsman and had been a keen hunting man in his youth. When Master of the Ward Hunt Staghounds, no rider was more dashing than he, or more popular with the hunt. As a jockey he had also had considerable success. He won the Ward Hunt Cup more than once, and had two other racing cups on his table, each of which had had to be won three times to become the winner's own. Fifteen years after he had relinquished the mastership the late Mr. John Waldron came into the Sheridan Club one evening, two days before the entries for the Ward Hunt Races were to close. A discussion arose as to the merits of various horses, during which Mr. Barrington broke in with " Who'll bet poor old C. B." (the way he always spoke of himself) " that he doesn't win the Ward Hunt Cup this year ? " As the entries were to close in forty- eight hours, and C. B. was known not to have possessed a horse for many years, the challenge GREY MALAHIDE 89 produced considerable amusement. Several fantastic bets were offered, some of the long odds being at once, however, taken by C. B. There was much jeering and laughter, in the midst of which Mr. Waldron exclaimed : " Well, now, perhaps you would like to back yourself to ride the winner as well, C. B. ? I'll lay you five hundred pounds to one that you don't ! " " Done," said C. B., and, after some more betting, the evening ended amidst general merriment. As his friends left the club-house they agreed that age (he was well over fifty) was beginning to tell upon C. B. If he did not stand to lose so little and win so much, such bets as had been made seemed to them to be almost unfair. " The old man doesn't understand what he is doing," was the general opinion. As it happened, however, the old man understood very well what he was doing. Once the money was on he did not waste an hour. Like a shot from a gun he left Dublin for a place a hundred miles away, where he knew of a splendid steeplechaser, Grey Malahide by name, he bought and entered it. On the appointed day C. B. was at the post in capital trim. Before the start his chances of winning became much fancied, and no more than even money could be obtained against the redoubtable Grey Malahide and his plucky rider. Though the three and a half miles of the race must have been a great effort for C. B., who had not been on a horse for so many years, he rode 90 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS with the greatest determination and judgment, finally coming in a winner by fifteen lengths, amidst a scene of enthusiasm such as has hardly ever been witnessed, even on an Irish racecourse. The whole thing was a wonderful performance. As a young man C. B., when out with hounds, could never bear to be beaten, and one day, out hunting with the Cheshire, the Master became very irascible at seeing the dashing Irishman, whom he did not know, pressing too close upon the hounds. "Hold hard!" shouted old Corbet. "Hold hard, you damned tailor ! " " I beg your pardon, sir. Not a tailor," retorted C. B. ; "a soap-boiler from Dublin." This was to some degree true, for at the time he was a partner in a firm of wholesale soap and candle merchants. When a very fit young man, C. B., thinking he would like to do some mountaineering, set out for Zermatt he had heard that the Eiger had never yet been ascended, and consequently thought it would be the very place for him. Having engaged two guides, he started on the ascent early one morning, but when he got some- where near the top the men refused to go on. C. B., however, finished the climb by himself and planted his alpenstock on the summit, with his handkerchief tied to its head. When he got back to the hotel and told the people there of his adventure, they declined to believe him. "Well, look for yourselves," said C. B., WELL BOUND AT THE LAST 91 and, sure enough, when they put their glasses up there was the alpenstock and the handkerchief. This feat of C. B.'s, it should be added, is mentioned in Mr. Whymper's book, but by a mistake the name " Harrington " has been sub- stituted for " Barrington." About the best epitaph which could be written for this genial and original Irishman would be some lines from Pierce Egan's farewell to one of his best characters, Bob Logic. Of Charles Barrington, as of the witty Oxonian, it may well be said that mirth and good humour were always at his elbows. He certainly played the first fiddle in all companies and was never out of tune. Mankind had been C. B.'s study, and he had thoroughly perused the book of life. As a choice spirit he was unequalled, and as a sincere friend never excelled ; above all, he was under all circumstances a man. Let us hope that the Great Auditor of Accounts will find poor C. B.'s balance- sheet correct, and, as the whole tenor of his life had been a volume of pleasure that it will be well bound at the last. IV RESTAURANTS THERE can be no doubt that the general level of cooking in London has been improved by the modern restaurant. Before the days of that Napoleon among hotel-keepers M. Ritz few private dinners were really well chosen or well cooked ; now, amongst wealthy people at least, culinary matters are dealt with in a satisfactory one might even say, artistic style. Our more remote ancestors do not appear to have understood gastronomy, for when Cardinal Campeggio came to England in connexion with the divorce of Catherine of Aragon, his report to his master the Pope, who had instructed him to make an exhaustive investigation into the state of English culinary affairs, was merely two words, " Niente affatto." There was nothing whatever to report about English cookery. During the mid- Victorian period, when there was a partiality for quantity rather than quality in food, culinary matters'had sunk to a very low ebb, though, of course, there were always a select few who pre- served the great gastronomic traditions of a more TAVERNS AND COFFEE-HOUSES 93 critical age. Our ancestors of the eighteenth and early nineteenth century were very particular about having nothing but excellent material. A little over a hundred years ago the catering for dinners was good ; not only in London itself but in suburbs such as Highgate, Hampstead, Chelsea, Greenwich, Putney, Twickenham, and Richmond, were taverns which provided good dinners and excellent wines. Gradually, however, as the old-fashioned coffee- houses and taverns closed their doors, and with the abandonment of leisurely ways, owing to increased competition, people in business at least became care- less about what they ate. The result affected all but the most wealthy class, and a good lunch or dinner except at one's own home became difficult to procure. In the early seventies an observant visitor to the Metropolis wrote : " It must be confessed that there is no continental capital so poorly provided as London with establishments where the stranger may obtain a fairly good dinner for a small sum, or an excellent dinner for a great price. In the western districts of the town, millionaires and spendthrifts may fare delicately, as well as sumptuously, at the few private hotels which draw their prodigious profits from a small class of luxurious and opulent visitors. But to test the capabilities of the chef retained in any one of these exclusive and decorous taverns, it is necessary that the curious inquirer should take an apartment and attain the status of a guest ' staying in the house.' Even when he places a coffee-room at the service of casual visitors, the keeper of a private hotel is little 94 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS studious to please callers who only 'drop in for dinner' before going to the opera." At that time, except at one or two resorts such as the Cafe" Royale, French cookery was not to be obtained. A few small Italian restaurants existed about Leicester Square and Soho, but except for these there was nothing but the old-fashioned chop- houses, whose arrangements, though acceptable enough to early Victorian people, were quite unsuit- able to the needs of a more luxurious generation. At antiquated hotels of the Covent Garden quarter and in some of the principal thoroughfares between the City and Hyde Park, there were quantities of dingy coffee-rooms where a substantial dinner from the joint and a pint of inferior wine might be obtained for eight or ten shillings. The Strand and Fleet Street also abounded in long, low, dirty rooms where economical feeders, seated on the narrow benches of a dozen or more little pews, could satisfy their hunger with plates of meat and vegetables in the din and heat of company three times too numerous for the space. There were also a number of modern, flashy, pretentious dining- rooms, where, in saloons splendid with cheap gilding and fly-flecked plate-glass mirrors, a weary mortal might get a piece of fish, a cut from a lukewarm joint, and a bottle of thin claret at an exorbitant charge. While the dining accommodation for even wealthy people was inadequate, the lower middle and working classes were catered for in a quite execrable manner, and practically forced into the public-house. In the OLD ENGLISH DINNERS 95 early eighties of the last century, however, quite a stir was caused in philanthropic and temperance circles by the starting of what were called coffee- taverns in many towns in England. Among the promoters were Lord Shaftesbury and the Baroness Burdett-Coutts. All bright anticipations as to those places proving successful rivals to the ordinary public- house were, however, doomed to swift disappointment. Like so many other enthusiastically welcomed schemes for the improvement of the people, their failure was complete. The causes were not far to seek. The refreshments were bad, the attendants slovenly, and the coffee execrable. I remember one being started at Eton when I was at school there, and at first it was a good deal patronized by Etonians. When, however, the novelty wore off the boys fought shy of it, and before I left, for some reason or other, we were forbidden to enter it at all. The worthy founders of these coffee-taverns were probably not happy in their selection of managers and other servants, looking more for piety than business capabilities. At any rate, with very few exceptions, most of the new ventures were ghastly failures. At that time, though elaborate cookery was rather difficult to get, there were one or two small, old- fashioned, rather expensive eating-houses which had a great reputation for providing a first-class old English dinner chops, steaks, and old port. About the best of these comfortable little resorts was the " Blue Posts," but far away was the " Bristol," then a great Cork Street resort of men about town for lunch and 96 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS dinner. It was situated almost opposite the late Sam Lewis's famous bow-window, and expectant heirs short of ready money seemed to have a particular fondness for the place. Sam himself also was not an infrequent visitor at luncheon, and at one time ephe- meral celebrities, such as the poor Jubilee Juggins, were regular features of the place. The cooking was quite good, but the arrangements primitive. There was no foyer, and those bringing ladies to dine had to wait for them in the small hotel smoking-room. Till the creation of the far more pretentious restaurant, as we see it to-day, the " Bristol " did very well, but with the opening of the " Savoy " it began to lose its popu- larity. It has now been closed as a restaurant for a good many years. The original Savoy restaurant was certainly one of the most agreeable dining-places the world has ever seen, for in addition to the excellent food the eye was gratified by hosts of pretty women. Compared to the present palatial dining-halls, it was, of course, quite a small place, but those who remember the halcyon days of 1895 will agree that nothing so bright and pleasant has been seen since. Few, alas, of the habitual frequenters who waited in the little passage (on the walls of which hung framed the first sovereign ever taken at the Savoy) while (after the manner of her kind) a fair companion lingered in the cloak-room, are still enlivening the West End, the fall in stocks and shares which followed the South African War sent many of them to far less amusing places. Most of the fair companions also now probably dine THE OLD SAVOY 97 amid less luxurious and more sedate surroundings. A few survivors, however, either making a brave fight against the hand of Time, or philosophically content to be frankly middle-aged, are still occasionally to be observed revisiting the scene of their lively youth. While the food and company made a strong appeal to habitues of the old Savoy, the decoration of th. original restaurant might justly have been called artistic, the general scheme of the room having been designed, I believe, by Whistler. The mahogany inlaid panelling, removed some years ago to make way for the present nondescript white woodwork, was very agreeable to the eye. This panelling, I believe, is still owned by the Savoy Company, who, it is said, have been offered as much as ,6,000 for it. The reason for changing the interior of the restaurant was, I understand, an idea that the public grow tired of lunching or dining amidst the same surroundings ; all people of artistic taste, however, regretted the alteration. The crowd which frequented the old Savoy was much more Bohemian than that which is to be seen there to-day, but care was taken to exclude any visitors likely to disturb the harmony which always prevailed there. Restaurants, I believe, have no legal right to refuse to serve any one, no matter how he or she is dressed, if sober ; and according to the strict letter of the law there is nothing to prevent a navvy from entering the Savoy, Carlton, or Ritz, sitting down at a table and eating a lunch there. This legal obligation, however, is, in the case of 98 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS persons for any reason undesirable in a first-class restaurant, surmounted by the manager declaring all the tables to be full. This very old trick was in former days carried to its farthest limits at Stephen's Hotel in Bond Street, a very fashionable and exclu- sive resort which, in its best days, was chiefly fre- quented by smart officers and men about town, who resented the intrusion of any one not of their set. Consequently, if a stranger came in to dine there he was stared at by the waiters like a wild beast, and solemnly assured that all the tables had been engaged beforehand. People are always lamenting the disappearance of spontaneous fun and unconventional ways. Genera- tion after generation of Londoners tells stories of a more amusing London which it has never known ! About 1895, however, at the height of the South African boom, the London of the pleasure-seeker was certainly gayer and more animated than it had been for years. Stockbrokers, when things are good, are notoriously very open-handed, and quite a number of them, who had made fortunes in no time, threw their money about like water. The " Pinafore " and other private rooms were often used for vivacious dinner-parties. Here it was that a gorgeous repast was given by a well-known South African financier to celebrate his triumph at Monte Carlo, where he had won a considerable sum by backing the red. Some of the ladies who were constantly to be seen at supper were not so decorous in their behaviour as A PRACTICAL JOKE 99 their successors of to-day. I remember one pretty girl who, by way of paying out her attendant cavalier, who had been giving her a scolding, seized a cham- pagne bottle and raised it to her lips, of course to the great scandal and horror of those at tables close by. Music during meals was then an innovation, and humming and whistling softly to the music of the band, which in those days played inside the dining- room, was a well-known way of irritating the manager ; one or two mischievous little ladies brought the art of modulating their tones, according to his proximity to their table, pretty near perfection. Practical jokes were frequent. The most amusing of these I always thought was that played by a well- known man about town (now a Member of Parlia- ment) at the Covent Garden Ball, which was then highly popular with the jeunesse dorde. Taking a box on the second tier, he filled it with a large party, into the centre of which he smuggled a most lifelike dummy of the late Sir Augustus Harris, at that time lessee of Covent Garden. This dummy, worked from behind, was made to perform such antics that a crowd soon assembled below, astounded and scandalized to see such behaviour on the part of the well-known manager, who at intervals appeared to be toasting those below. All of a sudden an altercation seemed to arise, and Sir Augustus was seen to be engaged in a bout of fisticuffs, which, amidst cries of " Shame ! " terminated in his falling over a chair at the back of the box. Suddenly, with a wild shriek, his opponent was 100 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS seen to raise the prostrate manager in his arms, and coming forward, to the horror of onlookers, hurl his struggling figure down to the floor below. At this stage of the proceedings, however, the real Sir Augustus, who had been informed of what had been going on, made his appearance at the door of the box and told the party within that they must leave the ball. In the earlier days of restaurants the advertising was not on nearly such a considerable scale as it is to-day ; the consequence was that the world of the outer suburbs rarely frequented the Carlton and Savoy. Some years ago, however, the latter em- barked upon a very ingeniously conducted campaign of publicity, consisting of a series of cleverly written articles inserted in various papers, including The Times. The purpose of these was to prove that dining at the restaurants puffed in them could be done well at a very moderate price, to demonstrate the excellence of the material, and to set forth the attention which any one partaking of even the most modest meal was sure to receive. In addition to the advertisements in question, attractively designed coloured pictures repre- senting the delights of dinner at the Savoy and the luxurious foyer (always thronged, it would seem, by a crowd of beautiful women and handsome men) intermittently appeared in the best illustrated papers. At first it appeared as if this campaign of advertise- ment (deplored, it should be added, by most of the old frequenters) was having little effect. But in reality it was not so. HALF-TONE CELEBRITIES 101 Bayswater, Balham, and other suburbs gradually sent their more prosperous residents to seek for luxury in the West End, and before long the dining- rooms of the smart restaurants became thronged for dinner on Sundays and supper on weekdays by crowds of visitors, belonging to a class which, thirty or forty years before, would as soon have thought of supping in the same room with actresses as dining with the devil himself. The well-cooked food, the artistic decorations and lighting, and the excellent band naturally made a strong appeal to those of the visitors who had a soul above the early Victorian surroundings of their own homes. Besides this, well-to-do Suburbia was also attracted by the prospect of seeing in the flesh a number of the smart or titled people whose doings are chronicled in the daily papers. Whether celebrities are present or not makes little difference. Visitors from the suburbs are often only acquainted with the physiogomy of their social idols from snapshots and half-tone plates, and Mrs. Jones of Bayswater is pretty safe in showing her knowledge of the great world by pointing out various diners as being Lord This or Lady That for the benefit of her guest, Mrs. Brown of Balham. The presence at supper, after the play, of one or two celebrated actors or actresses is a never-failing source of interest to such simple folk. Thoroughly alive to the various attractions of the gastronomic palaces of the West End, even the less opulent outer suburbs now make incursions into smart 102 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS restaurants. The expense is often lessened by a party sharing the cost of a small omnibus to convey them to the play, supper, and back to their homes again. As such parties, however, not infrequently exercise great economy, it does not seem certain whether they much benefit the finances of the more expensive restaurants, which are run on the presumption that its clientele rather likes getting rid of cash than looking after it. I remember once seeing a scene which to an old- fashioned maitre d } hotel would have been agonizing in its tragic novelty. Round a large supper-table at the Savoy, stolidly consuming every item of an excellently set supper, sat five men and three women, the latter, of course, in their cloaks. On the table, in place of the champagne, stood five carafes of water. To judge from appearances these people, who had evidently perfected the art of getting full value for their money, were anything but profitable to the coffers of the Savoy, which, spending large sums on decora- tion, linen, flowers, and the like, quite legitimately draws a great part of its profit from costly wines. Restaurant suppers, I believe, pay very well, for, owing to our absurd licensing laws, it is almost impos- sible for those partaking of them many coming in late from some theatre to eat very much ; at the same time they order just as much as if they were going to sup in peace. Those who manage the big restaurants fully realize this, and also the saving in wages and lights. In consequence, I believe, they rather prefer our ridiculous closing hours to the more SUPPER 103 sensible plan of giving people plenty of time for supper which prevails abroad. I have, indeed, been told that, had they not been of this opinion, the present Government would have been willing to make some modification in the law by which a first-class restaurant would be no longer treated as an ordinary public-house, and allowed to keep open long enough for its clients to eat their suppers without indecent haste. A feature of supper or dinner is now the great age of some of the frequenters. I fancy that it is becoming a regular suburban practice for young men with expectations to entertain elderly relations of both sexes who are likely to cut up well. The latter class, who have come to regard dining at a restaurant on Sunday night (which their immediate progenitors would have considered extravagant and scarcely proper) as a social function of extreme respectability and importance. Such parties generally contain a few freaks, with a tendency towards the flimsy wraps and meaningless embroidery, which for some reason or other is popular with their class ; it must be admitted, however, that most of the old ladies are handsomely dressed. Unfortunately, a number of them spoil the effect by retaining their cloaks in the restaurant. The only reason for this horrible trick must be a desire to avoid tipping the cloak-room attendant. While the incursion of Greater London has, in the opinion of many, had rather a bad effect upon both cuisine and service, it has in addition made the great 104 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS restaurants much duller than they were some years ago. They are no longer thronged by gilded youth and its attendant beauty, which have fled before the crowds of stolid-looking middle-aged people. The popularity of golf and motoring is probably responsible for the comparative absence of the frivolous habitut who of yore made a point of taking the object of his adoration to a sumptuous Sunday feast, the only note of exuberance being struck at a few tables by obese Hebrews with over-bejewelled matrons. The chorus of the musical comedy theatres, which brightened the restaurants of ten years ago, has to a large extent betaken itself elsewhere. For several reasons it prefers grill-rooms, where it is more at its ease lolling opposite an admirer. The "masher" of the eighties is now represented by youths whose mission and privilege (after an expensive supper) is merely to deposit immaculate beauty on her maternal doorstep. Musical comedy is more austere than burlesque, and the old-style chorister, fond of fun and champagne, is pretty well a thing of the past. Numbers of girls, quite rightly regarding the musical- comedy stage as the best marriage market in the world, go on the boards though they have no need to do so. An authority on the lighter forms of the drama recently said to me : " After all, the Gaiety and Daly's are about the best finishing academies for girls in England." So great is now the run on these two elevating London institutions, that parents now put their daughters' names down for them, as fathers do those of their sons for good houses at RESTAURANTS OF TO-DAY 105 Eton ! The competition has become very keen, and many homes of austere respectability have been saddened by a daughter's rejection. In spite of their increased popularity, restaurants have, I think, somewhat deteriorated of late years. To begin with, the late M. Ritz's maxim "Le client n'a jamais tort," which so largely contributed to the prosperity of the establishments over which he presided, does not now seem to be sufficiently emphasized the waiters are not so attentive or thoughtful as those of other days, when they were very carefully trained. A number of them, indeed, rush about as if taking part in a football match ; one is also frequently kept waiting for the minor acces- sories of dining. The quality of the materials has not improved, while the food does not seem to be so carefully cooked as in the past. The maitres cf hotel are less urbane, and do not take so much trouble to humour the fancies of visitors. The far-seeing policy of M. Ritz seems to be abandoned and everything has become rather slipshod and slack except the prices, which are higher than ever. There is, of course, a good reason for this, the cost of provisions having risen more than 25 per cent within the last few years, though nobody knows exactly why? What, however, there is no excuse for is the little tricks which would scarcely be in place in a night restaurant of Montmartre, such as obliging a client who calls for a cigarette to purchase a box. Why cannot he be allowed to pay twopence (100 per 106 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS cent profit to the restaurant) for one cigarette, instead of being made to buy a number of a kind he may not like, for, for some reason or other, the choice of cigarettes in the modern smart restaurant is very limited ? The price of the cigars is outrageous ; the res- taurant cigar, indeed, which has never been very good, is now, no matter what is paid for it, rarely smokable at all, no care being apparently exercised to keep it in condition. Anything more pitiable, indeed, than these Havanas after a few minutes' smoking it is impossible to conceive. When such a large profit (usually well over 50 per cent) is made, trouble might surely be taken not to provide sodden cigars. No doubt it is difficult to keep the boxes in an equable temperature, but an improve- ment on the present system, or lack of it, might probably be effected without much difficulty. In spite of such lapses as have been indicated above, the restaurants of to-day, though they may- have fallen below the standard set up by the incom- parable Ritz, are undoubtedly a great improvement upon those at which people lunched and dined previous to the opening of the old Savoy Hotel. There are many still connected with the business who are well acquainted with the system inaugurated by M. Ritz. Let them remember his methods, and reflect that it was their excellence which created a special public. The latter, should it ever realize that attempts are being made to extract money from its pockets without giving adequate value in PARIS RESTAURANTS 107 return, will inevitably desert the smart restaurants, which after all are mere luxuries and not necessities of daily life. Within the last twenty-five years nearly all the small Parisian restaurants which were noted through Europe, such as the Cafe" Anglais, Cafe" Riche, the Maison Doree, Bignon's, Durand's, all of which were not only on the boulevard, but at the corner of the boulevard have disappeared. A list of the distinguished people who have regaled themselves at these vanished shrines of gastronomy would make interesting reading. In 1867 five kings are said to have supped together in a cabinet particulier at Durand's, and, at the con- clusion of the banquet, discovered that not one of their majesties had money enough about him to pay for his supper. One restaurant used to be renowned for the number of royalties who came to dine there. A traveller once laughingly asked the landlord what he could give him in the way of kings to which the restaitranteur jocosely replied that he was very sorry, but that he was then out of crowned heads, and that the utmost he could offer him in the way of exalted rank was the Prince of Tour and Taxis. Those were the great days of gastronomy. Never since the days of Vatel had the amour propre of cooks reached such a pitch of sensibility. " Je lui ai compose^" said the great Careme bitterly of an unappreciative master, " une longe de veau en 108 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS surprise. II 1'a mangee ; mais il n'a pas su la com- prendre." So the disgusted cook " composed " a last sauce, which he called " La Derniere Pense de Careme," and shook the dust of the barbarous household from his feet. About the greatest compliment which was ever paid to a gourmet was the saying of the chef of the Brevoort House, New York. This culinary artist declared that he always knew when His Excellency Lord Lyons was staying in the hotel from the ex- ceptional tastefulness of the dinners selected from his bill of fare by the occupant of the suite of apart- ments on the first floor of the hotel. " Milor Lyon he arrive," the chef would remark to his roasting cook. "Je vois la le main du mattre" Some gourmets attached such importance to their dinner that they made a point of always eating it alone. If they only ordered for one, they frequently ate enough for a small dinner-party. To this school belonged Handel, the composer, who, having ordered dinner for three at a tavern, and being asked by the waiter when the rest of the company were coming, tranquilly replied, " I am de gompany." First-class cooking puts people into a good temper, and diplomatic manoeuvres have often owed their success to the softening effects of a good dinner. No one knew this better than the great Duke of Wellington, who, in July, 1815, when Blucher wanted to blow up the bridge of Jena, dissuaded the rough A SUCCESSFUL DINNER 109 old soldier over a dinner at Very's in the Palais Royal. " I must and will blow it up," grumbled old "Marshal Vorwarts " over his bisque soup. But when he got to his parfait au cafe and his third bottle of Moe't and Chandon, and was preparing to light his meerschaum, he seized the Duke's hand and cried, " Never was there such a dinner ; I will not blow up the bridge of Jena." Ordinary matters have from time to time had considerable influence upon politics. The Governor of the Palace of Fontainebleau appointed after the Revolution of 1848 was M. Auguste Luchet, well known both as a Republican and a gourmet. In consequence of this reputation he was accused by the anti-Republican newspapers of having fried and eaten the historic carp that Francis I fed with breadcrumbs, and to which the Duchess d'Etampes had thrown golden rings. In the days of Louis Philippe and even during the Second Empire the Palais Royal contained more first-class restaurants than all the rest of Paris put together. Dinners could be procured there to suit any price, and every culinary luxury was at the command of those willing to pay for it. Ve*ry, Vefour, and the Freres Proven9aux, though unknown to the present generation, deservedly occupy a great place in the annals of gastronomy. After the fall of the Empire, however, the first-class restaurants began to feel the effects of the decadence of the famous pleasure-resort, which gradually became 110 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS a mere lounge for tourists. To cater for this latter class, announcements of cheap dinners from i franc 50 centimes stared one in the face all over the old arcades. In the early eighties, however, there were still a few places, notably the Cafe d'Orleans in the famous gallery of that name, where a fair dinner could be procured. This cafe, I recollect, used to be much frequented by old-fashioned English visitors, the majority full of all sorts of queer traditional tricks which they supposed were a guard against any attempts at extortion. The class in question, for instance, had a great horror of hors d'ceuvres, which they would never allow a waiter to place on the table for a moment, the reason being a legend that an English family had been made to pay 25 francs because one of their number had eaten a prawn from a little dish containing 25, which a certain restauranteur priced at a franc apiece. Hors d'ceuvres and candles the old-fashioned traveller always connected with robbery and extortion ; indeed, some old ladies used to carry candles in their boxes, but I do not believe they ever got the best of any hotel proprietor. Ordinary English refreshments were then difficult to get in Paris and had to be heavily paid for. At one time a pint bottle of Hodgson's " East India Ale " at the Cafe de la Madeleine the only establish- ment where the beverage was sold cost four francs. At present, at many of the fixed-price restaurants, you are allowed to exchange the bottle of wine to which you are entitled for a quart bottle of English THE CAF& ANGLAIS 111 bitter beer ; and vast numbers of Frenchmen prefer what they facetiously term le champagne anglaise to that very dubious vintage, restaurant win ordinaire. The cheap dinners, two francs and upwards, which attracted unwary tourists, were in the number of their component parts wretched imitations of the lordly feasts of the Cafe Anglais and other noted shrines of gastronomy. All things in these terrible and strange meals wore an aspect not their own. Most of these dinners, indeed, resembled a really good dinner only about as much as a monkey resembles a man. At that time, however, there were many small restaurants where an excellent dinner could be ob- tained at a moderate price. Most of these, together with almost all the old-fashioned first-class restaurants, such as the Maison d'Oree, Cafe" Anglais, and Durand's, have now disappeared. Of the old-fashioned first-rate Parisian restaurants Voisin's, in the Rue St. Honore, now almost alone survives. The famous Cafe" Anglais, where in the cabinet particulier No. 16, known to all the viveurs of the Second Empire as the "Grand Seize," so many joyous suppers had been given, closed its doors for ever but a short while ago. On the last night of its existence a number of old habitues were entertained at a farewell dinner. While the old restaurants with the sober scheme of decoration and unmistakable air of refined calm 112 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS have disappeared, a number of new establishments of a more flamboyant description have arisen in their stead. Though the cooking at these places is occa- sionally excellent, it is certain that the new genera- tion of gourmets is rarely able to dine so well or so comfortably as the old. To dine on decent fare, in a richly but rather gaudily decorated room, where the conversation is impeded by the din of a noisy band, the diner must submit to pay what is often a ridiculous and outrageous price as well as to the scandalous exactions of an impudent wine carte. The decadence of Parisian cooking had already commenced in the early eighties of the last century, at which time M. Abraham Dreyfus, a high authority on culinary matters, writing in The XIX mc Siecle, pointed out how difficult it was be- coming to secure the services of really accomplished cooks, for the reason that first-rate chefs could always command much larger salaries in London, in Berlin, in Vienna, in St. Petersburg, in New York, and in San Francisco than they could obtain in Paris; and that at the slightest reprimand which they received from their patrons they threatened to " rendre le tablier" The Cafe" du Roi, once a celebrated restaurant in secret much patronized by the Royalists under the Empire, acquired its name in rather a strange fashion. One warm evening in autumn a young man, somewhat overdressed, with a very considerable border of pinkish silk stockings seen above the margin of his low boots, and a most inordinate amount of coat-collar, lounged along the Boulevard des Italiens, occasionally ogling THE CAFti DU ROI 113 the passers-by, but, oftener still, throwing an admiring glance at himself as the splendid windows of plate- glass reflected back his figure. He had just reached the angle of the Rue Vivienne, and was about to turn, when two individuals advanced towards him. They were both young, and, although palpably men of a certain rank and condition, were equally what is called out-at- elbows ; hats that exhibited long intimacy with rain and wind, shoes of very questionable colour, coats suspiciously buttoned about the throat, being all signs of circumstances that were far from flourishing. " Chopard, Brissole," cried the first of the three, " how long have you been in Paris ? " " About two hours," replied the first. " Just as I stepped out of the Place des Victoires I met our old friend here ; and now, strange enough, we meet you. Three old schoolfellows ! " " An instant later and we should have missed each other," said Brissole. " I was about to take my departure for Nancy." " To quit Paris? " " Yes ; I've had enough of it." " Don't be a fool," said Chopard. " Why, man, I've come to make my fortune!" " So much the worse ! " rejoined Brissole. " I have tried it for five years, and now look at me." " And you ? " said the dashing young man. " I have just had a piece hooted off the stage at Lyons, and so have come to Paris." "But what has been your luck?" cried Brissole. "You are, to all appearances, more fortunate." 114 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS "Aye, Jerome, how fares the world with you ? " " Pretty well," said the other, laughing. "Just now I'm King of Westphalia." " The deuce ! " exclaimed the two unfortunates, bowing respectfully; "and where is this country?" "Bah!" added Brissole, "what matters? It pro- duces fine hams." "Come and sup with me," said the new-fledged king. "This is Villaret's I'm the host. Be easy ; you, Brissole, I appoint my private secretary ; you, Chopard, my maitre de chapelle" The young men bowed their thanks, and, nothing loath, followed the king in to supper. The pleasant hours flew rapidly by bright visions of the future lent charms to happiness ; but, still, day- break came at last, and with it the sleepy waiter and the bill eight hundred francs. " The deuce ! " said Jerome, " and I have no money. You, Brissole, pay the fellow." " Your majesty, I have no money." " Then you must do so, Chopard." " I haven't a sou." "Send the landlord in," said Jerome, with a groan. " Ah, Villaret, there you are ! We have forgotten our purses, but as soon as I reach home I will send a servant with the money." " I have no doubt of it, gentlemen but it would please me better to receive it now, particularly as I have not the honour to know the distinguished company." In vain the trio found fault with the wine and attendance. THE IMPERIAL WATCH 115 "If I had the happiness of knowing messieurs," said Villaret, " I should hope on another occasion to please them better." "I am the maitre de chapelle to the King of Westphalia," said Chopard. Villaret bowed. "And I private secretary and privy purse to His Majesty," said Brissole. The restaurateur again bowed, but sarcastically. "And pray what office does this gentleman hold in His Majesty's service ? " he said, with mock humility. " I am the King of Westphalia," replied Jerome, with an attempt at dignity which the effects of a copious supper rather marred. " Frangois," cried the indignant Villaret, " fetch the police ! " "No!" said Jerome, springing to his feet, "you do not need them take my watch, it is worth double your bill. I will send for it." The landlord rather reluctantly agreed, but im- mediately after their departure, on examining the watch more minutely, he found the emblematic " N " of the Emperor. Fearing it had been stolen, he hurried to the commissary of police, who sent to Fouche, who went to Napoleon and told the whole story. The watch was a present from Napoleon to Jerome, but it was the want of dignity which characterized the whole affair that enraged the Emperor. King, secretary, and maitre de chapelle were sent 116 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS off to Westphalia, with strict injunctions to keep the story to themselves. A typical French restaurant of the past was the Maison d'Ore'e, the proprietor of which, when I first remember it in the early eighties, was old M. Verdier, who at dinner-time walked about looking after his guests in a frock-coat and black skull-cap. The appointments and decoration of this resort of gourmets always seemed to me admirably designed. On the walls was a paper of white stripes relieved by small golden stars. I have never seen one like it since. A rich carpet of a very subdued tone of colour was on the floor, and the whole place conveyed an impression of refined luxury. As at the Cafe Anglais, the plate was of silver. At that time the restaurant was lit by wax candles, but when old M. Verdier died and was succeeded by his brother, not very much younger than himself, much to the dislike and dismay of old patrons, electric light made its appearance. Absurd as it may seem, this was the beginning of the decadence of this famous dining-place. Up to the time of its installation quite a number of gourmets of the old school made a regular practice of dining at the same tables night after night. When the wax candles went a number of old clients said they would go too, and I have no doubt this did the place harm. In old days the ground-floor rooms of this restaurant were frequented mostly by men though, of course, ladies occasionally went to dine there. Foreigners visiting Paris generally made a point of dining at the Maison d'Oree, rather to the disgust of the regular THE MAISON D'OR^E 117 habitue's, who regarded them as interlopers. Cocottes, except those of the very highest class, were seldom seen, though frequent visitors at supper-time to the cabinet particulier upstairs, where so many viveurs of the Second Empire had held their revels. It was after dining in one of these rooms that the Duke of Hamilton met his death by falling down the stairs. In consequence of this tragic accident his successor would never enter the place. The regular clientele of the restaurant in its pros- perous days consisted of well-to-do gourmets, including a number of rich boursiers, who came to lunch there every day. When, however, the young Verdiers came into power, they tried to bring the place up-to-date ; the old waiters, some of whom had been there more years than anyone remembered typical Parisian char- acters who knew the exact tastes of their older clients gradually disappeared ; various innovations improve- ments no doubt, but quite unsuited to the old-world spirit of the famous restaurant were effected in many directions, with the result that the old habitue's went elsewhere to dine, their place being taken by a hetero- geneous crowd, amongst which were many Americans. The old restaurant, however, was too small, and its rooms too decorous in character to become a popular cosmopolitan resort ; and so, eventually falling between two stools, the proprietors, who in the meanwhile had started the very unsuccessful Maison d'Ore"e Club in London, were eventually forced to close it, and the place where so many admirable dinners had been eaten is now, I think, either a post-office or a boot- 118 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS shop. In its flourishing days the Maison d'Oree was the most satisfactory restaurant I ever remember. If you were known to the house they would serve you with a boiled egg and a piece of toast with the same ceremony as accompanied an elaborate and costly dinner. The way in which the old waiters brought in the dishes was almost sacramental certain special dishes there were, the secret of which the chef alone knew. One felt, indeed, that there was something more than a mere dinner in a restaurant, and everything was done to promote this impression. The scale of charges, I may add, though of course not cheap, was nothing like that ordinarily met with in modern caravanserais. From the Maison d'Ore"e it was that in the eighties I witnessed the destruction by fire of the Opera Comique, in which hundreds of people met their death a friend of mine in Paris at the time escaped death by the merest chance. A constant frequenter of the Opera when in Paris, an engagement luckily pre- vented him from that night occupying his usual seat. I can still see in my mind's eye the gallant little firemen climbing about the burning roof, the streets thronged with people, and the whole building opposite one blazing furnace filled with flame. The loss of life was appalling ; very few escaped. For days afterwards people declared that the vicinity of the burnt-out theatre smelt like a kitchen after a dinner had been cooked. This, however, was probably fancy. PINK CHAMPAGNE 119 A speciality of the Maison d'Ore'e was a certain pink champagne champagne rosd " St. Marceaux." It was, I remember, the particular brand, exceedingly good and quite different from the usual wine of this kind, which as a rule has little to recommend it except its attractive appearance. " Lily on liquid roses floating, So floats yon foam o'er pink champagne," as an American poet once wrote. A hundred years ago or so pink champagne enjoyed great popularity, but by 1825 this was rapidly fading away, and at the present day champagne of this colour is scarcely ever to be seen. The famous vintage of 1874, owing to the excellence of certain pink brands, due to a portion of the colouring matter having been extracted from the skins of grapes, for a time partly restored the fortunes of champagne rosJ, the cruder forms of which were also produced by the admixture of a small quantity of pink wine. In former days it was only very rarely that the ordinary Frenchman touched champagne. The wine in question, indeed, was often alluded to contemptuously as " le vin des cocottes" and more frequently "/al Boulanger ") was, on the other hand, rather a poor composition. Its popularity, I think, was largely owing to the fact that it really did describe the doings, or what the public imagined might be the doings, of a French lower middle-class family after witnessing the great Longchamps review. The end of poor Paulus, who, in his time, gave pleasure of a healthy, virile sort to thousands, was rather an unhappy one. Not content to be the shining constellation of the Cafe* Concert, he went into management and became the proprietor of the Bataclan, a rather second-rate sort of music-hall, which he was never able to make pay. This unfortunate enterprise, together with a wine business in which he was foolishly induced to dabble, eventually ran away with pretty well all his savings. He fell into ill-health and could not command his old salary when he tried to sing again. Finally, a broken-down invalid, he retired to the Midi where he had first seen the light, and shortly afterwards died in BOULANGER 145 the arms of a devoted friend who had soothed his last hours. Of the ill-fated General, for whom Paulus's song had done so much, I saw a good deal at the old Hotel de Louvre. Here he lived for a time, and once or twice he was accorded a sort of small ovation as in full uniform he descended the great staircase into the courtyard. Most of the staff of the hotel, however, were not at all impressed by him or his methods. I well remember being told that the changes which he made in the equipment of the French Army merely put money into certain people's pockets. They certainly did one thing, which was to keep the General's name before the public. The changes in question, as far as I can recollect, consisted in painting the sentry- boxes red, white, and blue, allowing soldiers to wear beards and giving them latitude in the matter of gloves. Besides this, alterations mostly useless and inartistic, were made in uniforms. At one time great excitement was caused by the announcement that the gendarmerie was to have its traditional headdress, the cocked hat, worn en battaille, replaced by a helmet of General Boulanger's own design. There was great opposition to the idea of any innovation of the sort and the proposal was dropped. Since then the cocked hat has gone. I suppose it would seem even more ridiculous to English travellers of to-day than it did to their predecessors, who used to laugh at what they called the Punch-like appearance of the gendarme who, with his yellow belt and huge sword, was one of the first figures which struck their sight on the old landing-stage at Calais ? 146 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS General Boulanger, though he may have wanted to do away with the cocked hat of the gendarmes, fully understood the artistic value of his own general's cocked hat and handsome uniform. He certainly cut a fine figure on his black horse Tunis at the famous Longchamps review. For a time it really seemed as if the brav Ge'ne'ral might succeed, but from the evening when he failed to march upon the Elysee his fortunes steadily de- clined The story of that famous evening when General Boulanger with his friends at Durand's was expected to sally forth by the crowds assembled outside, I heard from the lips of the proprietor, M. Sylvain, who, before retiring to a country house at Brie Comte Robert, where I hope he still flourishes, entertained me at lunch in the very room where the famous dinner had taken place. He described to me the enthusiastic crowd beneath the windows, the exulta- tion of the Boulangists, and how it gradually turned to dismay as they saw their leader's disinclination to march, culminating in complete despair as they saw that nothing would make him take immediate action. " Alors" said M. Sylvain, " le Ge'ne'ral a pris son paletot, et le mouvement Boulangiste e"tait mort" As a matter of fact Boulanger, as I happen to know from one who was deep in the counsels of the opposing party, was far better informed as to the reception which awaited him at the Presidential Palace than his followers. A considerable number of picked soldiers, every one of them heart and soul M. CONSTANS 147 devoted to the Republic, were stowed away in various parts of the building, from which they could havo fired with deadly effect. The arrangements in case of attack were far more complete than any one had any idea of except the President, M. Constans, his lieutenants, and General Boulanger himself, whom the Minister of the Interior, with his usual astuteness, took care should know through the medium of certain casual acquaintances, apparently mere irresponsible chatterboxes, but in reality clever spies, who, while keeping the Republicans informed of everything which went on in the Boulangist camp, on occasion fright- ened the General by letting slip, as if by accident, news of stern measures about to be put in force by his opponents. One of the greatest stumbling-blocks to Boulanger's success was the fact of the Military Governor of Paris being opposed to him. Besides this, the troops, who had been carefully canvassed by clever spies, were on the whole faithful to the Republic. The Government and General Boulanger knew this, the mass of the Boulangist party did not. At every turn the General was confronted by the clever machinations of the astute and well informed M. Constans, who eventually put his adversary to complete rout. Nothing could have been more methodical than the way the former managed the electoral campaign, the result of which practically ended the General's career. Some time before the election, M. Constans, summoning his agents, spread out the map of 148 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS France upon a table before them, after which he proceeded to mark the Departments with a pencil. " These, gentlemen," said he, indicating various Boulangist strongholds, "are hopeless, and therefore it is useless to spend a sou in trying to win them. They should be placed in the same category with these other Departments which, as they are absolutely certain to return our candidates, should make no tax whatever upon our war chest. " Now we come to the doubtful Departments to win these we should concentrate all our energies and spend all our funds. Do as I say, and victory is assured." The eventual success of his party at the polls showed how rightly M. Constans gauged the situa- tion. Once the campaign had begun he neglected no means to defeat the Boulangist party. Some of the methods employed would have appealed to English boroughmongers of the eighteenth century, and quite a number of seats were won by cunning diplomacy. In a certain constituency of considerable importance secret service agents reported "that a redoubtable prop of Boulangism was a certain lawyer, who, owing to his excellent relations with the small farmers and peasants, would exercise great influence upon the result of the election. This lawyer, though well off, lived very simply and knew little of Paris. His wife for some time past had been suffering from some obscure malady which the local doctors were unable to diagnose." In consequence of this AN INTERESTING INVALID 149 report a great Parisian doctor, known to be devoted to the Republic, was sent off to stay as a friend with a gentleman, secretly also of strong anti- Boulangist principles, who lived not far from the lawyer, to call upon whom the doctor was taken shortly after his arrival. During the visit the host, speaking enthusiastically of the certainty of triumph for le brav General at the polls, said the only thing which now de- pressed him was the continued indisposition of his wife, which medical advice seemed powerless to cure. "Will you let me see her?" said the doctor. "I have a large practice in Paris, and possibly I may be able to throw some light upon the case. I may add that I shall esteem it a favour to be allowed to see her, not as a medical man, but as a friend." The lawyer, delighted, took the doctor to the sick-room, and the latter, after making a prolonged and careful examination of the patient, begged to be allowed to see her again in three days, in order to be able to give a definite opinion. Meanwhile he reported to the wire-pullers in Paris that the woman's malady was not serious, and he felt sure that he could cure her with great ease what was he to do ? The answer came back : 44 Cure the woman, but do not cure her too quickly bring her up to Paris and arrange that the husband should visit her there at frequent intervals." The doctor in due course went to the lawyer's house, and after another and prolonged examination of the invalid, told the husband that he had dis- 150 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS covered what was the matter. " Madame," said he, " will never get well in the country ; she needs most careful attention from specialists who could not come down here. Her case, I may add, is so interesting that I should esteem it a favour to be allowed to take her to Paris and put her into good health without making any charge. Rest assured she shall be well looked after, and I hope, monsieur, that from time to time you will do me the honour of being a guest under my roof, in order that you may see how she is getting on." The woman was taken to Paris and placed in a luxurious " home," where she was kept for six weeks till the eve of the elections. During that time her husband came frequently to see her, being on every occasion regally entertained and brought in contact with clever and diplomatic agents of the anti-Boulan- gist party. The result of all this was that gradually the lawyer quite lost faith in Boulanger, and eventually went all over his district exhorting every one he had ever met to vote for the Republican candidate, who, principally owing to the lawyer's influence, came in by a large majority. This was one instance out of many of the astute if rather unscrupulous ways in which the Republic was saved. As a matter of fact it is very doubtful whether the people of France as a whole would ever have tolerated any attempt to substitute any other form of Government. In spite of considerable peculation and intermittent FRENCH RULE 151 tripotage the Republican regime is certainly not unpopular among the proletariat, who, in spite of showering abuse (for the most part no doubt quite deservedly) upon politicians, are perfectly contented with the present regime. In spite of many tedious formalities which are the results of a somewhat overdeveloped system of bureaucracy, French rule is amazingly popular as compared with that of any other nation. Love of France, it is said, of late years has increased rather than diminished in the lost provinces of Alsace and Lorraine, many inhabitants of which have made enormous sacrifices in order to remain Frenchmen. Sentiment of course plays a large part in this romantic attachment for France, but the question of sentiment does not concern the Savoyards, who, in reality Italian by race, are happy and proud to be Frenchmen by nationality. At the time of the late President Carnot's assassi- nation, when discussing the crime with a Savoyard boatman on Lac Bourget, I was astounded to hear the way in which he spoke of the Italians as he said, countrymen of the assassin. Murderers, thieves, swindlers no term of abuse did he leave unemployed at the same time express- ing the greatest delight that his dear Savoy formed part of France. Since 1789 the French have tried so many forms of government that they may be said to respect none. Driving back from Longchamps after the Grand 152 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Prix not many years ago, I was much amused at the anger of my cocker when his fiacre was forced to draw aside in order to let the Presidential carriage go by. In a furious rage the man called poor M. Faillieres every insulting name he could think of; he then went on to denounce public men in general tas de voleurs, who passed their lives swindling the poor ! And what scandalous salaries these salops received. I pointed out that at any rate the Presi- dent, who was merely preceded by a few bicycle police, did not keep up any wasteful state ; but far from soothing the cabman, this made him more angry, his idea being, as far as I could make out, that the Presi- dent of the Republic ought to give the people some show for their money. I then asked him did he think he would like a Louis XIV better? To this, after a moment's hesitation, he replied, " Yes." The men- tion of the Rio Soleil, indeed, quite soothed him down, and putting his long-suffering horse into a gentle trot, he jogged peacefully back to Paris in a capital temper. The fact is, in spite of their democratic ideas, the French have an idea that a president is a sort of rather expensive second-class imitation of a king. Most of the Presidents of the French Republic, indeed, have been regarded with the greatest indiffer- ence. M. GreVy was always being sneered at for his love of economy ; he was never liked. Sadi Carnot, however, partly by reason of his name and partly by reason of his sympathetic personality, did attain to some degree of popularity, while his tragic death at Lyons evoked a good deal of real sympathy. The cir- SADI CARNOT 153 cumstances of his terrible end stabbed by the dagger of the infamous Caserio, who, on the pretext of offering a bouquet of flowers, climbed on to the step of the presidential landau, proved that the state carriage- builders of the past, who built chariots with bodies suspended a good way from the ground, had their wits about them. Had the poor President been driving in an old-fashioned conveyance of this sort he would most probably have escaped. By some mischance that fatal day President Carnot had elected to use a landau, hung low with a fixed step a high slung vehicle with step folded up when the carriage was in motion would have baffled the designs of the assassin. Sadi Carnot, endowed oddly enough with a coun- tenance of rather a Persian type, had not the appear- ance of a lucky man. I remember seeing him at Longchamps and noting his sad, almost melancholy, look. He was a good President, and partly no doubt on account of his name, which recalled the glorious doings of the Republican armies, enjoyed a much larger share of popularity than his predecessor or successors. The state funeral which was accorded to him was a wonderful affair. I watched it literally for hours as it passed along the Rue de Rivoli. As a matter of fact, it never had any actual end, for there were so many deputations, etc., that the latter portion of the procession a confused mass broke up before it got anywhere near Notre Dame. Lord Dufferin, I remember, was a conspicuous figure among the 154 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS diplomats, all of them on foot. He was dressed in the scarlet coatee of a lord-lieutenant, the effect of which picturesque old-world dress he had, however, completely spoilt by substituting an Indian feathered solar topee the cocked hat is of course an essential feature of the uniform he wore that day. The authorities were very apprehensive of some Anarchist outrage on the line of route, and in the Place du Palais Royale, the guns of the horse artillery were loaded ready to fire in case of need, while the soldiers stood by armed as on active service. Before the procession arrived there was a considerable display of military force; dragoons kept galloping up and down the street, pushing back stragglers into the road in anything but a gentle manner. The theatrical instinct of the French, generally to the fore on such occasions, was in this instance, I remember, exemplified by a handsome young general who, sitting his horse well, intermittently cantered from point to point, accompanied by a brilliantly uniformed staff. For some time after the death of President Carnot stringent precautions were taken to protect public men in France. I remember seeing Casimir Perier driving along the Boulevard closely surrounded by a large escort of Cuirassiers, each man near the carriage holding a loaded revolver in his right hand. Altogether an extraordinary state of affairs prevailed during this anarchist craze the real history of which movement, I fancy, will never be written ; there is, however, little doubt but that the peril was ANARCHISM 155 somewhat exaggerated by various persons having political axes to grind, some of whom even went so far as to manufacture bogus outrages in order to serve personal ends. There were, of course, a number of true anarchists, dangerous characters who, like Michel Bakounine, the founder of their strange and incoherent creed, were mainly swayed by inordinate ambition and an inordinate desire to attract public attention by no matter what means. In these days, when all sorts of cranky fools are taken seriously, the story of the founder of the anarchist party is well worth remembering. A Russian aristocrat, he left the army at an early age to study the works of Hegel and Schopenhauer, and settling at Moscow, came in contact with many clever young men, a number of whom, such as Alexander Herzen, the romantic revolutionary who founded the Kolokol in London, Bjelinski, afterwards a great Liberal publicist, the Panslavist brothers Aksakoff, and Katkoff, in later years director of the Moscow Gazette and chief of the old Russian party, cut a considerable figure in the world. The various ideas and con- victions of his friends seem to have entirely muddled Bakounine's brain. At one time he was a fervent Panslavist (in the contemporary Larousse he is described as Bakounine, " patriote russe "), at another, influenced by Herzen, he was wildly socialistic and revolutionary. Every- thing he did was indeed a contradiction pessimist, socialist, and internationalist in theory, in practice he was nothing of the sort. A warm advocate of the 156 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS restoration of the ancient kingdom of Poland, he took part in the Panslavist Congress held at Prague in 1848, where he sat cheek by jowl with Vladika of Montenegro pensioner of the Czar and representa- tive of the Servian Prince together with many others who had not the least sympathy with democracy. A year or two later he took part in the Saxon revolution and was only saved from execution by Russia, which, for some reason or other, got him handed over to her and sent him to Siberia in 1851. In 1 86 1, however, he was in London, and the next year once more he was pleading for Panslavism. A few years later began his struggle with Carl Marx, which at first resulted in the triumph of the latter at the Hague Congres de 1' Internationale in 1872. Bakounine being a refugee in Switzerland, and France and Germany, through which he would have had to pass, being closed to him, he could not appear to meet his rival face to face. In 1873, however, when the "Congres" was held at Geneva, Bakounine routed his enemy, whose principles were discarded by the majority in favour of his antagonist's wild ideas, mainly resting upon federalism and active opposition to all authority. Bakounine's Anarchism is entirely different from Revolutionary Socialism, Collectivism, or Positivism as a matter of fact it is little more than a wild chaotic and destructive nightmare. After Bakounine's death, in 1876, Elisee Reclus, Paul Brousse, and others carried on the propaganda. Soon, however, the anarchists split into two parties. EVERYBODY OWNS EVERYTHING 157 The first, entirely negative in its ideas, may be said to have arrived at nothing, its programme being aimed against 1. Property, capital, the exploitation of man by man. 2. The idea of a fatherland, no more frontiers or wars between nations. 3. The State war against all authority, whether elected or not, dynastic, or constitutional. The second party was more affirmative in character, its two chief principles being, however 1. Do as you like, and 2. Everything belongs to everybody. It was in 1876 that two Italian anarchists first mooted the idea of propaganda by deed. At the Congres of that year, Carlo Capiero and Enrico Malatesta read a declaration, in which they set forth that the insurrectional deed destined to affirm socialist principles by acts is the only effectual method of propaganda. The next year both these men converted their words into deeds by heading a revolt in Italy and burning the archives of Tetino and San Galo. This was the earliest outrage produced strictly by the monstrous and insane creed, the devotees of which hailed Ravachol and Vaillant as ill-used martyrs. For a considerable period of time Anarchism was an ever-present danger, real or supposed, to the Parisians. Once, however, that the Dreyfus affair had begun to run its course little more was heard of it. The whole "affaire" arose through racial hatred and the personal unpopularity of Captain Dreyfus. 158 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS A Frenchman who had held high office under the Republic and who had been at the Ecole Polytechnique with Dreyfus, told me that the latter was always cor- dially disliked by his fellow-students. While nothing in particular could be brought against him, his unsympathetic manner and ways, and his habit of poking his nose into matters which did not concern him, made him an object of general detestation, while he was suspected of being capable of any dirty trick. Walking on the Boulevard at the time when "T affaire" was first beginning, the above-mentioned Frenchman having read a placard " Trahison (fun Officier Juif " at once said to his friend (also an old Polytechnicien), " I bet you that's Dreyfus." "I'm certain of it," was the reply; "and also certain of something else, which is, that he is not guilty." The truth of the latter remark is now generally acknowledged. Captain Dreyfus in matters of routine was a first- rate officer. No battery was kept in better order than his. He had, however, no tact, and retained his old student habit of rummaging about after matters which did not concern him. Not unnaturally (the more so as he was the first Jew ever appointed to the General Staff), he was thoroughly unpopular with his colleagues. His persecution and trials are now mere matters of history. All that can be said is that Dreyfus, besides having the misfortune of possessing an unsympathetic nature, had the even worse one of being a most unlucky man. ZOLA 159 The only good which resulted from the whole miserable affair was to show the splendid character of Emile Zola. At the time of the second Dreyfus trial, in consideration of his noble fight for justice, he received from some admirers a medal on which was inscribed a fine saying of William the Silent : " // nest pas ndcessaire d'espdrer pour entreprendre ni de rdussir pour per severer" VI ART, YESTERDAY AND TO-DAY I FANCY that at heart most English people think that applied art, that is to say fine architecture and the like, is something that matters very little is not worth troubling about, in fact! We spend millions on educational schemes, the results of which are in a large degree futile, and at the same time do little or nothing to promote one of the very best forms of education, which is an apprecia- tion of artistic and harmonious design in architecture and things in ordinary use. Notwithstanding our boasted progress, the taste of the people at large is hopelessly below that of their predecessors of the eigh- teenth century. Pictures of public rejoicings of that date show that the decorations customary on such occa- sions were always appropriate and often artistic; under similar circumstances to-day, poverty of design and tawdry details are invariably predominant. The people of the eighteenth century always had a style, sometimes no doubt feeble, but yet a style. We of to-day have none, and, when old styles are copied, for the most part they are copied wrong. While enormous prices are paid for cunningly advertised FOLLOWERS OF FASHION 161 masterpieces, the majority regard any attempt to import an artistic spirit into the minor necessities and accessories of daily life as being needless and out of place. Quite a number of modern collectors who believe themselves to be fond of art are merely followers of fashion. If a man is really artistic he is interested in every kind of well-executed work, from a Gothic cathedral to a French print, and can appreciate good design of no matter what style or period. Many wealthy collectors who pay large sums for objets d'art, at heart do not care a scrap for beautiful things. Out in the country with one of this type, who, to do him justice, was not an indiscriminating buyer, and chancing to pass a little village church, I attempted to call his attention to one of its singularly fine windows, the tracery of which was of a most elaborate and charming pattern, the stonework, well and truly laid by long-forgotten craftsmen in the ages of faith, being in addition delightfully mellowed by the hand of Time. Nothing, however, would induce my friend to stop. He had never heard of the church, and the window did not bear the hall-mark of general recognition, therefore why should he bother about it ? had, how- ever, its weather-beaten tracery (after some adroitly arranged puffing) been on view at one of the famous West End art dealers, I am sure he would have been amongst the first to rush and see it. The idiotic ideas which the craze for antiques, merely because they are antiques, occasionally inspires, 162 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS were best, perhaps, expressed by the lady who, on being shown a very beautiful piece of furniture (frankly described as modern) by an honest dealer, exclaimed, " Oh, what a sad pity ! If it had only been old I would have bought it at once." Decorators and furnishers are, no doubt, greatly to blame for not trying to lead public taste into better channels, but they often have to contend with colossal stupidity and fathomless ignorance. The designer attached to one well-known firm, being asked to furnish plans for an Oriental smoking-room, incorporated some careful reproductions of the splendid work to be found in the Alhambra at Granada. The people who had ordered the room, however, did not like this at all. " We don't want copies," said they, "but original work ; besides, we don't care about the ' Alhambra ' the ' Empire ' is built in a more cheerful style ! " Side by side with a veritable craze for collecting and paying enormous prices for furniture, pictures, and prints, there exists a complete indifference as regards ancient architecture and the fittings of old houses and churches, unless they have been widely boomed, after which process, as in the case of the Globe Room at the Reindeer Inn at Banbury, they become valued at some sum quite disproportionate to their real worth. The circumstances connected with the sale of this room, which Lady Algernon Gordon Lennox and Lord Curzon tried so hard to save, were indubitably highly discreditable to the town of Banbury and to the well-to-do residents of the surrounding district. THE GLOBE ROOM 163 Not one of these, with the exception of the lady mentioned above, seems to have made the very slightest effort to save the room from being carted away. As for the town, putting aside all considera- tions of art or sentiment, it would have been a good investment for it to have purchased the old inn as it stood. Carefully renovated by competent hands, the old house would undoubtedly have attracted visitors who would have been a source of profit. The local authorities, however, were apparently too dense or too indifferent to pay any attention to the matter, and so the Globe Room, sold by the firm of dealers who purchased it at an extravagant price, has been packed away to the other side of the Atlantic, no doubt to form a smoking-room for some American millionaire ! A large quantity of old, or reputedly old, woodwork must have been sent over to America within the last fifteen years ; but I believe it is doubtful whether in half a century much of it will be left, the climate in most parts of the United States being unfavourable to the preservation of furniture made of old wood. As, however, no small portion of the old cabinets, tabfes, and chairs bought by Yankee millionaires have in reality been made a few years ago, there is a good chance of the descendants of these connoisseurs inheriting a fair number of masterpieces of Sheraton and Chippendale in fair condition. Up to quite recently old English woodwork was held to be of small account. The careless treatment which has been accorded to 164 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS the fine old fittings of churches and chapels is a proof of the artistic incompetence of clerics and others respon- sible for the upkeep of our colleges and schools. Much fine old woodwork has disappeared from Oxford and Cambridge, and most glaring instances of vandalism have occurred at two of our great public schools. In the forties of the last century, Eton (which very re- cently ran up a monstrous building of the " municipal lavatory " type as a Memorial Hall) cheerfully ac- quiesced in the wilful destruction of the interior fittings of her chapel, the design of which is said to have been furnished by the soaring genius of Wren. In 1877 Winchester committed an act of unparalleled vandalism in casting out of its chapel the magnificent panelling, which is now not many miles away at Hursley Park ! The panelling in question which has been valued, I believe, as high as ,100,000 at the so-called " restoration " was allowed to become the property of the contractors, who eventually sold it for ^50 to an ecclesiastical dignitary who hoped to be able to preserve it. Not, however, being able to make use of it, he eventually sold it again. That ardent fighter against vandalism, Mr. Arthur Leveson- Gower, found it in 1903 in the possession of the next owner, who was willing to part with it for ; 1,200. Mr. Leveson-Gower then used his best endeavours to get the Winchester authorities to buy back this price- less treasure, but they refused to listen. He next approached the authorities at Eton, having some idea that the fine old woodwork might be utilized for the Eton memorial ; this suggestion, however, was MR. LEVESON GOWER 165 not considered practicable, and it was then bought by an architect and sold, but for something approaching ^"30,000. To-day it is the glory of a private house within a few miles of Winchester. There is a roll of shame as well as a roll of honour ; the names of the governing body which allowed the removal of this panelling certainly deserve to figure on the former. To the honour of the Warden, the Rev. Godfrey Bolles Lee, he was not among the ignorant men who approved of the removal of the beautiful Grinling Gibbons carving from the chapel in order to carry out Mr. Butterfield's scheme for increasing the ac- commodation. The removal of the panelling remained a grievance to Mr. Lee for the rest of his life, and he never ceased to deplore the fact of the chapel having been spoilt by the substitution of sham Gothic fittings. He opposed the alterations in every possible way, but his objections were ruthlessly overruled by the majority, whose vandalism he was powerless to check. Unfortunately at that time the Warden was not ex officio chairman of the governing body, but only an ordinary member. In a despairing letter to The Times, Mr. Leveson- Gower, to whom all honour is due, recently pointed out that nothing seems to stem the current of this ruthless " restoration by continual acts of vandalism." Even while he wrote, two old city churches were closed for "restoration" and the removal of their galleries ; while but a few weeks before, the noble old 166 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS church of St. Mary, in Rotterdam, held on a perpetual lease and founded in the reign of Queen Anne, sub- scribed for by the Queen, by Admiral Sir George Rooke, and many other eminent Englishmen, possibly built by Wren, and at all events an excellent type of church of his date and in a perfect state of preserva- tion, had been ruthlessly torn down, all its fine wood- work offered for sale a landmark in Rotterdam gone for ever in order to satisfy some passing whim, and to provide a modern, up-to-date church for the use of the British residents of that town. This latter act of vandalism was a disgrace to every one concerned. Much the same kind of thing, unfortunately, has, from time to time, taken place in England, the prin- cipal offenders having generally been the clergy, owing to whom most of the picturesque village churches, so many of which, up to the middle of the last century, were full of highly interesting details, have been completely spoilt. In some cases, where dilapidation prevailed, so- called "restoration" may have done good; but, as a general rule, it has merely vulgarized and spoilt the buildings to which it has been applied. The word " restoration " is really a misnomer for the attempt of one age to recreate that which essentially belongs to another and entirely different age, and cannot of necessity prove successful. At best restora- tion, even of a thoughtful kind, can only be considered as a sort of antiquarianism diverted into a mischievous channel ; it should also not be forgotten that were it ever completely successful it would be but a falsifi- " RESTORATION " 167 cation of history and a fraud to take in future generations. There is, however, little fear of this; "restorations" may shock, but they hardly ever deceive. The struggle to preserve fine old buildings gains comparatively little sympathy from the public, the excellent Society for the Preservation of Ancient Buildings not receiving anything like the support its most judicious efforts deserve. The war which it wages against vandalism in general is more or less an unequal fight, for, like the legendary Phcenix, the Philistine is always rising afresh from his own ashes, as destructive, as incapable of appreciating relics of the past as were the cavemen of dim prehistoric times. Ignorance is one of the most active agents in promoting the destruction of fine things. The incendiary who had gleefully taken part in the burning of the library of the Louvre in 1871 really had a very good excuse when he defended his conduct by the remark : " After all, what do you expect? I cannot read." For the "restorer," however, there is no excuse in the sixties and seventies he probably did more harm, from an artistic point of view, than the rough old Puritans had ever done. One of the peculiar crazes of the restoring architect was laying down encaustic tiles. The resuscitation of the art of making this form of artistic pavement, which was indirectly due to the influence of Sir Charles Barry and of the elder Pugin, has produced some deplorable results. Coloured 168 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS tessera arranged in a classically geometrical pattern were used by the first-named architect more than forty years ago for the pavement of the atrium of the Reform Club. The erection, all over the country, of a vast number of public buildings and ecclesias- tical structures of so-called mediaeval design, and the restoration of a large number of churches, gave great encouragement to the tile industry; tiles, indeed, more suitable to public lavatories than venerable buildings were laid down almost everywhere ; artistic ineptitude ran riot. Unfortunately this ineptitude is still more or less a persistent characteristic of modern English art. Even when a design is beautiful it too often exhibits triviality or inconsequence. A striking example of the latter is the Lord Kelvin Memorial Window in Westminster Abbey a gift of the Civil Engineers of Great Britain and the United States, which was dedicated on July 15, 1913. This window, beautiful enough in its way, is in a very suitable position, overlooking as it does both the grave of the great Irish scientist and that of Sir Isaac Newton. It would, however, have been thought that some attempt would have been made to commemorate the scientific achievements of Lord Kelvin, but to this can it be believed? not the slightest attention has been paid ! With reference to this deplorable omission, an "Old Student of Kelvin," writing to an evening paper, said : " Representations of Henry V, Abbot William INEPT ARCHITECTURE 169 Colchester, St. George and St. Denys, the Dukes of Gloucester, Exeter, Bedford, and Sir Thomas Erpingham ; also of Richard of Cirencester, William of Sudbury, John Lakynheth, Thomas Merkes, Peter Combe, Richard Harweden, and Richard Whitting- ton. I find, on the other hand, nothing to symbolize science or the career of Lord Kelvin. A red-and- green presentment of Peter Pan would have been quite as appropriate." Westminster Abbey possesses what I fancy is a unique specimen of painted glass in the form of a representation of a great Victorian engineer George Stephenson, if my memory is not at fault wearing a top-hat ! Ineptitude also extends to our modern architecture. What could be more unsuitable to London than the style of the Piccadilly Hotel and other huge modern erections ? Well might a discriminating critic, "Sir William Eden," write to the Saturday Review : " Let us obliterate, if we can, the reproach of the South Kensington Museum, the horror of Harrods' Stores, and that worst of all disgusting objects, the Victoria Memorial." I cannot, however, agree with him when he adds : " Let us try to forget Mount Street," for that thoroughfare, whatever may be the demerits of its architecture, is at least an attempt to produce a complete modern street in a style of its own. This, at all events, is something ; for since the eighteenth century we have had no style at all. What is 170 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS sorely needed is a decorative idea, characteristically English, but based upon the best classic models of antiquity. It should be remembered that the British imitation of the Grecian style, which prevailed towards the close of the sixteenth and the beginning of the seven- teenth centuries, was improved by Inigo Jones, nay, almost carried by him to perfection. This he effected by elevating ceilings and altering the shape of windows, by which means he removed the gloom and darkness which characterized the preceding period of architecture. What was begun by him, Sir Christopher Wren completed. It is an extraordinary thing that the plans for build- ing streets left by this great architect have not been utilized in new thoroughfares, such as Kingsway. The whole history of modern London architecture, indeed, is merely a long series of wasted opportunities. In the matter of preserving ancient buildings of historical interest things, however, are not so bad. Owing to the exigencies of modern life in great towns, it is, of course, often very difficult to save them. London lost much when she lost Temple Bar, which should, of course, never have been parted with by the Corporation ; and at the present time, accord- ing to the Press, we are threatened with the loss of one of the only two blocks of genuine Tudor domestic architecture still in existence. If this report be true, Cloth Fair, which contains the Dick Whittington Inn, housed in a building of Henry VIII date, is to disappear, together with the IMPROVEMENTS 171 adjacent streets like Cloth Fair erected by Lord Rich in the reign of " Bluff King Hal." The contemplated demolition, it is stated, will be undertaken for the purpose of making way for " cold stores and offices in connexion with the market," and to provide more standing room for carriers' carts. St. Bartholomew the Great, of course, will remain, but if the scheme of demolition be carried out, it will really become little more than a show-place for tourists, as the entire resident population of the parish, which it was built to serve, will have been practically wiped out. The estimated net cost to the ratepayers of this "improvement" will be about two hundred thousand pounds. If the scheme be completed in its entirety, the last surviving remnant of the old City of London as it existed before the Great Fire, will vanish, for Staple Inn, the only other Tudor building now left, is with- out the City boundary. The County of London contains few really old houses. An old court in Bow Lane, Poplar, was built in 1616. There are only one or two tiled-roof houses in Wool- wich and two in Plumstead. A few old almshouses are all that remain in Lewisham ; the oldest parts of Rotherhithe and Bermondsey are late Jacobean. Westminster, once rich in old buildings, has not one left ; there are none in Islington, and only a few on the fringe of St. Pancras. So rapid and frequent are the changes in London at 172 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS the present time that many comparatively modern buildings which have been erected at great cost are already making way for newer and bigger structures. Amongst recent demolitions of this sort, the old General Post Office must not be forgotten. Every one interested in architecture and culture in general should obtain and read an article which clever Mr. Filson Young wrote as to this demolition in the Saturday Review that " lively weekly " which of late has regained the vivacity of its brilliant youth. With all its faults the present age undoubtedly takes more interest in architecture than was the case in Victorian days, when a purely utilitarian spirit pre- vailed, akin to that displayed by the Dey of Algiers, who, after Lord Exmouth had bombarded half his city into a mass of ruins, offered to bombard the other half, if the British Government would compensate him for his trouble. Old buildings, no matter how beautiful, fared very badly when they could be put to practical use. The mixture of utilitarianism and simplicity which characterized England almost throughout Queen Victoria's wonderful reign was very curious. In the great towns men were entirely absorbed by their business, conducted, of course, in a far less speculative way than to-day, but still very strenuous and even exacting. Combining a stern private morality with sharp business practice, art had no meaning for the majority most of whom rather despised it as immaterial to success. In the smaller towns and villages a peaceful and THE MID-VICTORIAN ERA 173 sheltered existence was the general rule. There was practically no social unrest, and the majority were quite content to drone out their lives with scarcely any variation as year succeeded year. The men hunted and shot at the proper seasons, and, with their womenfolk, paid an annual visit to town. Social affairs, and the exchange of rather heavy dinners with neighbours, occupied most of the rest of the time. Interest in gardens "a beautiful and refined taste" was not then what it is now, and those who did go in for gardening seldom achieved anything like perfection. As understood in those days, a fine garden consisted of huge blocks of gaudy flowers, chosen quite irre- spective of their colours. Most of the Mid-Victorian country gentlemen were quite indifferent to science, art, or modern improve- ments. They had, it is true, mostly got past the stage of actually hating anything new merely because it was new, but, nevertheless, they heartily mistrusted innovations. Not a few doubted whether the inven- tion of the steam-engine had not been a mistake, and would have cheerfully gone back to the ways of their fathers or grandfathers. The country gentry which at that time still lived upon its estates regarded itself as the very salt of the earth. The sons, if they did not go into the Army, Bar, or the Church, stayed at home and did nothing. The daughters, till they were married at least, led a life of modified seclusion which was almost Oriental, whiling away their very abundant leisure with semi- useless occupations, such as tatting, crochet, and 174 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS working appalling fire-screens, the designs adopted being, in almost all cases, hideous to a degree. The pretty, often beautiful, little arts practised by their grandmothers of the eighteenth century, who produced some real masterpieces in the way of dainty decorations, were regarded as childish and out of date. Taste in art changes as rapidly as fashions in dress. What is admired by one generation is despised by the next, and the Victorian rather scorned the pretty trifles which it had known in its childhood. At heart its spirit was eminently serious, as was shown by the somewhat morbid way in which its writers have treated death. A curious love of being harrowed by grief permeated all classes. The interest which Queen Victoria showed for funerals, memorials, and her pro- tracted mourning for the Prince Consort undoubtedly enhanced her popularity with the British proletariat. The undertaker's business has always made a great appeal to the lower-middle and lower classes ; indeed, it is well known that the crowning ambition in the labourer's life is a handsome funeral. Coffins, shrouds, hearses, and nodding plumes delight him. He and his wife are enthusiastic over what they will call a beautiful corpse. The pomp and apparatus of mortality made a like appeal to Queen Victoria, who seemed to find a kind of bliss in tears, and numbers of well-to-do people were of the opinion that this was the proper thing to do. Art of no matter what kind was regarded as being essentially frivolous, if not sinful, and unworthy of the attention of serious folk. PLUSH 175 The beauties of pre-Revolutionary objets dart were little appreciated, except by a cultured few, and the work of even the great dbdnistes of the Louis XV and Louis XVI period was contemptuously classed as Rococo and undeserving of serious appreciation. William Morris, it will be remembered, called the magnificent productions of the old French cabinet- makers "bankers' furniture," For Chippendale or Sheraton masterpieces few wealthy Victorians cared a jot. Admirably designed chairs, bureaus, and the like were sent downstairs to the servants' hall or upstairs to the attics. The same procedure was often adopted with regard to master- pieces of the engraver's art. Mezzotints made little appeal to the Victorian fancy, which liked to let its complacent gaze rest upon heavy mahogany couches and chairs ranged stolidly against a gaudily papered wall, relieved by some totally meaningless pictures, or coloured prints showing imaginary Italian peasants in stiff and conventional poses. About the most hideous (of many hideous) features in a Mid- Victorian room was the fire-place with its heavy mantelpiece. In the late seventies a craze arose for having a board placed on the top, covered with plush or stamped velvet embellished with gilt nails, in addition to which there were often curtains at the side, full of meaningless embroidery. The raison d'etre of the latter, I suppose, must have been that they were intended to hide the ugly grate with its rounded top, but as they were never drawn there was no valid reason for them at all. 176 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Victorian lack of taste in many cases made a clean sweep of valuable and artistic relics of the eighteenth century, and many delicately designed mantelpieces were swept away to make place for ponderous con- structions embellished with decoration of that pecu- liarly meaningless school of design which seems to have been so much admired by the visitors to the Great Exhibition of 1851. A short time ago, in company with an expert, I was looking at two huge marble Victorian mantel- pieces enriched with ponderous carving of the usual inartistic character. " They must have cost a good deal," said I, "at least ^100 apiece, and now I suppose they wouldn't fetch ^25. " "They cost," said the expert, "over 500 the pair, and if you could get any one out of a lunatic asylum to buy them, they would not fetch more than ^10." Sic transit gloria Victoria mundi. The artistic outlook of the Victorian was in certain respects childlike. For instance, when mechanical methods came to be perfected, people took great delight in imitations of hand-wrought work being produced by machinery. Fine old iron railings which had been deftly con- trived by skilled and clever craftsmen of the past were discarded in favour of cast-iron monstrosities, the conventional designs of which lacked the slightest grace or sign of imagination. The charm of old work is that it bears the definite imprint of its maker's personality ; the defect of the new, its entire lack of character. MACHINE-MADE 177 To those, however, who had passed their childhood amidst hand-made things, the idea that a machine could actually produce that which, superficially at least, answered all requirements seemed marvellous. The last survivors of the old craftsmen, who even in the earlier portion of the nineteenth century were not many in number, discovered that their day was gone, and soon the fine tradition which prompted good workers to put their very best work into anything they undertook was supplanted by a new and bad ideal of turning out everything as quickly and in as large quantities as possible. The factory system which thus arose has, except to the very limited number of individuals who have made colossal fortunes, artistically proved little less than a curse. The only thing that can be said for it is that it has been necessary, in con- sequence of the enormous increase of population unfortunately in the main composed of indifferent specimens of humanity. For this increase, however, the system itself is indirectly responsible. No one, I suppose, would hold up the average worker in a huge manufacturing town as being, either physically or mentally, the ideal type of man. While the goods turned out are, on the whole, fair in quality, many of the cheaper products have little to recommend them ; extensive puffing, however, will sell most things. The reputation of an article is seldom achieved merely by its excellence. It requires many years of advertising years of continual and expensive 178 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS advertising to convince the public of anything ; and if any article which has achieved popularity ceases to be advertised, the sale of it at once sensibly decreases. This was proved years ago by the head of a certain enterprising firm, who when, after some years, its reputation had spread throughout the length and breadth of the land, conceived the idea that the time had come to put a stop to this expensive process of advertising. "In future," said this gentle- man, " I mean to take the full interest from my capital instead of paying part of it to the printers." And he set at once about it. Accordingly that year the firm spent a few thousand pounds less than usual in advertisements. The consequences immediately made themselves felt, and as month followed month they became still more disagreeably perceptible. The head of the firm then realized that in London virtue is its own reward only provided it keeps a trumpeter : and as he was not an obstinate theorist, he again had recourse to the printing-press. Determined not to spare expense he paid as much as ^900 for the insertion of his advertisement on the back of the wrapper of the Catalogue of the Great Exhibition, with the result that his business again became as prosperous as ever. The articles turned out by this firm were, of course, quite as good during the period when they were not advertised, neverthe- less the public came near overlooking them, for advertising is an indispensable item in the expendi- ture of a great London firm. Fashion as well as advertisement has, no doubt, AESTHETES OF THE "SEVENTIES" 179 a good deal to do with influencing the public taste ; reaction against the taste of a previous generation also affects it. Most of the Victorian designers, indeed, not a few of whom had passed their child- hood amongst tasteful surroundings, produced by cultured eighteenth - century craftsmen, actually despised the work of their talented predecessors. There was an almost entire lack of artistic symbolism in most of the furniture and decorations produced between 1830 and 1875, born, no doubt, of the attempt to draw inspiration from the machine-made goods, which were such a source of pride to the generation which had complacently witnessed the almost complete extinction of individual taste and skill. I think, at a time when there is so much to be deplored, it is a highly reassuring symptom that the public in general are slowly but steadily coming to value good hand-made things at their proper value. The aesthetic movement of the seventies, at which so much fun was poked, undoubtedly contributed to this artistic awakening ; we should, indeed, be grateful that the type immortalized as Bunthorne ever existed. About this time it was that the word " artistic," now in such constant use, came into vogue. Oddly enough, this word, as was recently pointed out in an interesting article in The Times, is one of the words which have no right to exist, because they have come into use to express not a thing or an idea, but a mere vagueness or confusion of thought. "The word 'artistic' usually implies (said the 180 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS writer) that all art is a mystery which only a few initiates can understand. The rest of us must not expect to enjoy a work of art ; the best we can do is to enjoy our own recognition of the fact that it is a work of art, and we express that recognition by calling it artistic. We must feel for it the same kind of reverence which the savage feels for a hideous idol. He believes that the idol is powerful because the priest tells him so, although he has never seen it exercise any power ; and we must believe that a picture is artistic because we are told so, although it produces upon us no effect whatever. But there is this to be said for the savage : that he does believe what he is told by a particular person who is sup- posed to be an expert in such matters ; whereas no one knows who are the people who decide whether a work of art is artistic or not, or on what grounds they decide it." To the aesthetes of the late seventies " artistic " meant blue and white china, Japanese fans, and green or yellow curtains. They were, indeed, much given to swathing all kinds of things in what was termed "art drapery" of those colours "greenery- yallery" as they were called. Nevertheless, it was the " greenery-yallery " school which made the first attack upon plush picture frames, plush - framed mirrors plastered over with crude paintings of fruit and flowers, and other similar horrors ; the so-called art decorations and blue china which supplanted these atrocities, in spite of the satire they evoked, paved the way for better things. OLD-FASHIONED ! 181 The Victorians loved covering up everything with little mats, generally decorated with flimsy tassels or pompons, care apparently being taken to select a material which might be relied upon to attract the greatest quantity of dust. They were also very partial to painting mahogany doors or bureaus black and gold, cutting up fine prints to make screens, and affixing modern china plaques to elaborately decorated cabinets. Numbers of people, who prided themselves upon their taste, relegated beautiful pieces of eighteenth-century furniture to the lumber-room. The art of the eighteenth century was considered merely as " old-fashioned," a word which people were fond of scornfully using in con- nexion with old furniture, prints, and other objets d'art, now worth untold gold. A striking demonstration of what the Mid-Vic- torians thought of the artistic furniture which is now so highly prized is afforded by the criticism which the late George Augustus Sala a man, be it remem- bered, in many things by no means wanting in taste passed upon a room in the old style, designed and furnished by two ladies (the Miss Garrards, I believe) in the English Section of the Paris Exhibition of 1879. "The section of a poky little English room is shown, furnished in the angular and uncomfortable style pertaining to the end of the last or the begin- ning of the present century a style of which I thought that we were well rid, but for the revival of which there seems to be at present a partial 182 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS craze. These rickety, 'skimping,' spider-legged chairs, tables, corner cupboards and ' whatnots,' these sofas too narrow for purposes of flirtation and too short to put your feet up are all very well in the delightful pictures of Mr. George Leslie, R.A., and Mr. G. H. Boughton. In actual oak, walnut, mahogany, or rosewood I object very strongly to them ; and, if the lady-decorators will study even the rudiments of the History of Decoration, they will find that this kind of furniture belongs to a period when a succession of long and cruel wars had virtually shut us out from the Continent, and had left us a people almost entirely ignorant of the art of design and wholly destitute of taste. The carpet in the lady-decorators' model room is a significant illustration of our deplorable condition at the period which the apartment is supposed to illustrate. It is a carpet substantially without a pattern, and there is a good reason for the absence of pattern. In the age in question we did not know how to draw carpet patterns, and we could import no pattern-draughtsmen from abroad. The two ladies may be complimented on the scrupulous fidelity with which they have reproduced a number of poverty-stricken and weak-kneed little models ; but the value of their work is diminished by the extravagant prices which they have affixed to the examples of upholstery exhibited. Sedulous rummaging among the brokers' shops round Lincoln's Inn and behind the Waterloo Road would buy for so many shillings what these ladies have charged so many pounds for. On the whole, this little exhibition of THE CRAFTSMAN OF THE PAST 183 a state of domesticity to which it is to be hoped we shall not return is interesting." Many things have changed since the days when this was written, and sedulous rummaging in London back streets now very seldom procures any genuine old furniture at all. What cost shillings then is now, in the majority of instances, worth a very large sum. The contemptuous reference to the carpet substan- tially without a pattern is typically characteristic of one of the worst features of Victorian taste, which delighted in meaningless patterns running riot over all sorts of unsuitable material. On the other hand, rich Victorians who deemed themselves art-connoisseurs paid large prices for suites of furniture and heavy cabinets of the style which attracted such admiration in the Great Exhibition of 1851. Though almost invariably of execrable design, the workmanship, up to the seventies at least, was ex- cellent. It is a curious coincidence that the passing of the first Education Act should have coincided with the complete disappearance of the old spirit which caused craftsmen to take a pride in putting their very best work into whatever they took in hand. With very few exceptions the workman of to-day is quite unable to comprehend the fine ideal of his pre- decessor, who made it a point of honour that nothing bad or skimpy should be found in anything with which he had had to do. This type of craftsman, which has been practically extinguished by the democratic system, reached his highest development under the daimios of old Japan and in the days of French 184 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS aristocratic rule before the Great Revolution ; another proof, if proof is needed, that aristocracy fosters Art while democracy kills it. Blame the ancien regime as you like, it gave to the world numbers of enduring monuments of real beauty, together with objets (fart many of which are so mar- vellously well wrought as often to defy exact repro- duction. The creators of these beautiful things took a delight in their handiwork. The modern craftsman with his " get money as quickly as you can " spirit, does not care a jot about any one's opinion. He only wants to get as much pay from his employer as possible, and under present conditions it is difficult to blame him for doing so. As a rule (mainly, it must be admitted, through no fault of his own) he starts im- measurably lower than the skilled craftsman of a past age who, whether he was making much or little money, whether his accounts were paid or unpaid, scorned to turn out anything, no matter how small or trifling, into the workmanship and design of which he had not put his whole heart and soul. An enormous quantity of valuable objets d'art was destroyed during the Napoleonic wars ; even more fatal to Art were the immediate results of the French Revolution, when a clean sweep was made of so much that was beautiful and interesting. Even men of high talents and culture, carried away by frenzy, rejoiced in the wilful destruction of everything in any way connected with the old regime, and witnessed acts of mad vandalism with complete complacency. " WARMED MYSELF LIKE THE REST " 185 The engraver Wille, for instance, an individual of high mental and artistic attainments, wrote in his journal (date June 19, 1792) : " To-day an immense quantity of the chronicles of the noblesse were burnt in the Place Vendome, before the statue of Louis XIV. I went and saw the cinders still glowing. There was a huge crowd near by, who were warming their feet and hands. There was a very cold north wind, and I warmed myself like the rest." At this period many municipalities, when ordered to furnish inventories of objets dart and historical documents appropriated by the State, saved themselves the trouble by committing them to the flames. The effects of the French Revolution, owing to various reasons, were highly destructive to many beautiful relics of the past. The young Republic, amongst many other things, lacked gold for its coinage, for which reason the authorities of the City of Lyons did not for a moment hesitate to melt down a priceless collection of ancient medals. Superb fabrics and magnificent tapestries containing gold thread were ruthlessly destroyed in order to obtain a few pounds of the precious metal. In accordance with two orders issued in Flore"al and Prairial of the year V, some of the most ancient tapestries of the Royal Collection were cynically burnt in the courtyard of the famous Gobelins manufactory itself, the object being the extraction of a certain quantity of gold and silver. The tapestry in question, 186 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS consisting of sixteen sets (180 pieces!) was of incom- parable beauty. The populace in general showed itself brutal and stupid as regards works of art. The wonderful stag of the Chateau d'Anet, by Benvenuto Cellini, now happily safe in the Louvre, was in 1793 roughly handled by a crowd of peasants. Feudalism, they declared, had disappeared, and a stag, even of bronze, being a survival of the ancient sporting rights, must be ruthlessly destroyed. The zeal shown by many of these peasants for destruction well illustrated the boundless limits of human stupidity. They carried their idiotic ideas even into the peaceful realm of garden life. In their disordered minds certain choice plants bore the hated brand of aristocracy. Orange-trees and cacti were special objects of abomination to these savages. "Republicans want apples, not oranges!" was the insensate reason given for the attempted destruction of 180 superb orange-trees which, being at that period of great rarity, were with difficulty happily saved. Perhaps the most striking instance of Republican brutishness was an incident at thejardm des Plantes, where a number of fools mutilated the bust of that friend of Nature, the great and gentle Linnaeus. At the same time ignorance and cupidity sacrificed chefs-doeuvres of Titian T and of Leonardo da Vinci. 1 A Titian of enormous value was burnt at the Chateau of Caumartin, and a fine bronze of Leonardo da Vinci was mutilated at Fontainebleau. AN ASTOUNDING REPORT 187 It would be tedious to enumerate the many acts of deliberate vandalism which disgraced the French democracy. Suffice to say that if it warred against tyrants, it warred also against art, science, and letters. It should be remarked that a large number of the men who were at the head of the Revolutionary movement (many of the ideas of which were ad- mirable) did everything possible to check the destructive folly of the people. The Convention, indeed, issued decree after decree enjoining the populace to respect works of art. These, however, could not entirely arrest the violence of a maddened proletariat, for the most part quite unable to under- stand anything except that they were free to pillage and destroy as they liked. The manner in which Revolutionary ideas turned the heads of intelligent and artistic men may be judged from the astounding report which, on the 6th Messidor, year II, Bouquier submitted, in the name of the Committee of Public Instruction, relative to the repair of pictures and objets dart in the National Collections. In this document he demanded the elimination of sickly pictures, such as the productions of Boucher and Van Loo and others of the same schools, whose effeminate brushes were not calculated to inspire the masculine and nervous style which should characterize defenders of Liberty. " To depict the energy," said he, "of a people who, by breaking its chains has voted the freedom of the human race, fierce colouring, 188 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS a nervous style, and volcanic brush could alone suffice. " It is time," continued he, " to abandon the French routine, essentially monarchical, which, making the arts minister to the caprices of false taste, of corruption, and of fashion, has shackled their genius, imparted affectation to their methods, and diverted their real end." As a matter of fact, the beautiful Louis XVI style had already been succeeded by that at first known as Directoire, and later as Empire ; Percier and Fontaine having in 1793 furnished the Ebeniste Jacob with designs for the furniture for the Con- vention, inspired by a spirit of classic art, modified to suit more modern needs. VII FASHION WITHIN the last few years fashion, as regards both man's and woman's dress, has certainly become more elastic and tolerant. During the Victorian Era, though oscil- lating from full to narrow skirts and from draped to undraped, sometimes elaborate and sometimes simple, the mode of feminine dress, within certain limits, was always strictly defined. When crinolines, for instance, went out, they practically disappeared altogether, the only exception being Spain, where the ladies retained the huge hooped skirt, originated by their countrywoman, the Empress Eugenie, long after it had ceased to be worn elsewhere. To-day more latitude prevails, with the result that, ladies dressing rather to suit themselves than to con- form with the dictates of fashion, feminine costume has become more artistic and graceful than of yore. The grotesque combinations of colour which were to be seen in the seventies and early eighties no longer offend the eye, and the days of wild eccen- tricity in millinery seem to have passed away. In 190 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS former days ladies often had queer manias in con- nexion with minor items of their toilet ; some, for instance, wore queerly coloured gloves. The least harmful from an artistic point of view was the idiosyn- crasy of Lady Caroline Lamb. " How many pairth of thtockingth do you think I've got on ? " once lisped out this lady to an astonished partner at a ball " thikth ! " A peculiarity of modern feminine dress is a costly simplicity which was unknown in less luxurious and extravagant times. All classes of women, indeed, now spend more on their clothes than was the case in former days, and almost every young woman down to the working class occasionally goes in for "stripping for dinner," as the old Irishwoman termed evening dress. While feminine costume has become more elaborate, man's dress, on the other hand, has deteriorated in every way. It was an ill day for sartorial display when George IV decreed the adoption of trousers. The First Gentleman in Europe, who was Regent at the time, is said to have arrived at this momentous decision, which entailed the abandonment of the aristocratic knee-breeches, only after a prolonged conference with a select committee of ladies, with Lady Conyngham at its head. All over Europe and even Asia a craze for uniformity is evident in male costume. The quaintly garbed characters who in the past gave a note of colour to the streets of great cities have gone or are THE COLOUR OF ROME 191 going. Even in Rome, of which in the past they seemed to be a sort of appanage, the guardian of the law, who many years ago exchanged his plumed cocked hat for a copy of the London policeman's helmet, views such people with no friendly eye. Rome, before the abolition of the temporal power of the Pope, was an incomparably more picturesque city than it is to-day. Its streets were full of life and colour, thronged by peasants with steeple-crowned hats set off with ribbons and flowers ; scarlet waist- coats adorned with gay buttons and embroidered with gold and silver ; breeches tied at the knee with ribbons or fastened with silver buckles ; their legs were pro- tected with gaiters, and their waists by woollen scarves, bright cravats gave an additional note of colour. Peasant women sported coloured bodices, laced in front by ribbons, and short petticoats which, if they did not hide their thick ankles, showed a bright buckle on the shoes ; most of them wore a square fold of white linen lying on the top of the head fastened to the hair by a silver arrow. Priests of every rank monks, cardinals, monsignori, abbes, friars perambulated the streets in every garb. To-day almost the whole of this motley crowd has vanished. All over Europe, with some few exceptions, national costume is being abandoned altogether or worn only on gala occasions, as stage dresses are worn. In Hol- land, however, I understand that the peasants in certain districts, in consideration of retaining their national dress, are subsidized by a certain great agency 192 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS of travel, the object of course being to provide tourists with something to look at. In the general abandonment of old-world and national costumes England has lost least of all. Except the smock-frock, there does not appear to have ever been a real English national costume. The Highlanders, of course, had their kilt, but I am not sure that either the Welsh or the Irish ever possessed any distinctive dress of their own. It is true that in connexion with recent attempts to revive Gaelic in Ireland a sort of kilt has been worn, and probably those who devised it had some authority for its pattern. Many years ago, during a previous craze for Gaelic, an amusing incident occurred. A little German tailor amassed quite a small fortune by teaching visitors to the Emerald Isle the "old Irish language," of which, as a matter of fact, he knew not a single syllable. Nevertheless, one of his pupils, an English officer, after being taught by him for twelve months in Dublin, was announced to be a complete master of the real Gaelic tongue. Gaelic is only spoken in remote districts, and a sudden call took the pupil abroad without his ever having an opportunity of trying his powers in conversation with a real Gaelic- speaking Irishman. A short time later this officer, abroad with a friend, and walking through the streets of a German town, remarked, "Well, I'm blessed if these Germans don't all talk Irish!" " Whatever do you mean ? " rejoined his companion. MOTOR DRESS 193 "Why, I speak Irish, and to convince you they do the same, I'll address the first person I meet." He did so, civilly inquiring the hour of the day, and receiving a polite answer ; at the same time the native asked if the officer were German. " No," replied the latter, "but are you from Ireland?" The native had never heard of such a place. An ex- planation ensued, and the officer found that his Dublin tutor had made him a perfect German scholar, while swindling him into the idea that he had been learning Irish ! The automobile is, of course, largely responsible for the present slackness of fashion as regards clothes. It has, indeed, entirely changed the dress of the man about town, who, even a dozen years ago or so, was wont to pride himself upon the perfection of his tail coat and the immaculate shininess of his top-hat. Walking in Piccadilly in former days one could not help being struck by the little groups of smartly turned-out men who were wont to perambulate the old thoroughfare. To-day it is becoming quite rare to see people dressed in anything but what were once called country clothes. Such an equipment was sup- posed to be not at all the thing to be seen in in town, but such a prejudice has now completely disappeared. As for the cuffless shirts of soft material, the mashers of the eighties would have been horrified at the mere idea of appearing in them in any part of London. All the time-honoured traditions of London dress have been outraged since motoring became popular. If with some loss of distinction, this revolution has 194 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS undoubtedly been accompanied by a considerable increase in comfort. It is, however, a pity that, owing to the sinister influence of that inartistic spirit which seems to be inseparable from modern civilization, something more agreeable to the eye has not been evolved, for, if comfortable, man's newest form of dressing is undoubtedly somewhat slovenly and un- dignified. To wear bowlers and straw hats would have been considered as the acme of bad form in the Rotten Row of the past. To-day a rider in a top-hat has become almost an object to stare at, a strange sloppiness of attire being the object aimed at by most of the male and female riders. When this tendency comes to be analysed it is seen to be but another proof of the lack of robustness of the present age and its contempt for everything which makes for dignity and order. The old school of riders, in their tightly buttoned coats, trousers with straps, and shining hats, belonged to a different type altogether. They felt they represented the aristocracy of England and must therefore keep up a well-turned-out appearance before the outside world. The modern school either have no traditions or are contemptuous of such traditions as they have. In brief, their ineptitude and sloppiness of mind expresses itself even in their dress. In the West End of London the top-hat still more or less holds its own, especially in the evening, when it has triumphed over the opera-hat. Nevertheless it does not occupy the exclusive position it did thirty years ago ; out of the season in particular, top-hats in THE TOP-HAT 195 the daytime, except as part of the insignia of a professional man, are growing rare. Any one entering a good West End club wearing this form of headgear during the daytime in August is liable to be chaffed. This, I think, bodes ill for the future of the hat in question, for there is no more potent destroyer of time-honoured things than chaff. It was this, no doubt, which drove the picturesque cocked hat out of fashion. For years, after it had been abandoned in the daytime, a small form of cocked hat was worn in the evening by men of fashion ; and an ill portent for the survival of its successor is that it seems to be going exactly the same way. The top-hat is an English invention. It began to be worn in England, in the morning, about the year 1757 ; and after the French Revolution, because it was adopted by the Parisians probably from an idea that it was an outward sign of equality and less ostenta- tious than the cocked hat it became popular in both countries and has maintained its popularity ever since. The artistic eye has denounced it as being unsightly, and scientists have accused it of promoting baldness. On the other hand, it has found defenders to declare that it is the most healthy head-covering ever worn, on account of the cooling atmosphere which it produces above the head in summer and the warm one in the winter. Many efforts have been made to banish it, but in spite pf time and change it has hither- to held its own. Originally the top-hat was of beaver, gradually, however, this gave way to silk. 196 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS One of the earliest hats of velvet-pile silk, the precursor of the velvet-napped silk now in general use, was made for Lord Lyndhurst, who is said to have been the first English nobleman to adopt the silk hat. Originally the material on which the silk was fixed was of stuff or felt ; but after a time these were supplanted by the perforated willow body, giving rise to the well-known "gossamer hat." Messrs. Lincoln and Bennett, however, were the first to have recourse to muslin and cambric securing thereby the much- desired lightness as well as to a chemical composition technically known as " coodle " for proofing in lieu of the customary size, glue, resin, pitch, oil, and naphtha, the presence of which was apt to become unpleasantly obvious when the warmth of the head made itself felt. It is curious that man's headgear probably an unnecessary adjunct should be a symbol of civiliza- tion. One of the most ancient forms of it would appear to have been the Phrygian cap. Italy gave the world the Cap of Liberty and the fool's cap Venice the Doge's cap. Coverings for the head were little cared for -by the hardy Celtic and Teutonic tribes, but a cap or bonnet, answering the double purpose of a hat and helmet, was occasionally worn by their chiefs as much, perhaps, for distinction as for defence. Its material was originally leather, and its shape, among the Britons and Irish, conical. The flat bonnet now worn in Scotland, anti- quarians do not consider to have formed part of the primitive costume. If ancient, it is of Saxon, Norman, THE CAP 197 or Danish introduction. One shape, though not the best known of the Scotch bonnet, bears a curious affinity to the still earlier Phrygian cap worn by the Saxon, the Anglo-Norman, and most probably the Dane. The cap of antiquity has undergone many trans- formations during the ages. The old-fashioned Highland bonnet, the Turkish fez, the Hussar's busby and the kalpak of the Cossacks, the cloth top of which protrudes above the fur, are all modifica- tions of the original cap, which never had a peak or brim. The Greeks, Phoenicians, and Gauls stiffened the point. Old-time sailors all wore it, no doubt because it was ndt easily blown off. The cap, it should be added, has always remained peculiar to countries directly or indirectly influenced by Greece or Phoenicia, for which reason, I suppose, like most nations quite indifferent to historical traditions, the modern Greek Army wears a kfyi, though the cap of the ancient Greeks from whom they claim descent was under no circumstances ever peaked. The cap was unknown in ancient China and Japan, though modified forms of it were to be met with in India. The top-hat, really identical with the shako, the bowler or billycock (originally, it is said, Billy Coke), the sou'-wester and other modern forms of headgear, all have their histories. The dignity imparted to man by a striking head- dress is nowhere better exemplified than by the case of the judge's wig, the abolition of which, even in this iconoclastic age, no one has ever yet ventured to 198 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS propose. Nothing, jndeed, is more extraordinary than the enormous air of authority and weight which is imparted to a quite insignificant-looking individual by this head -'covering a fact with which no one was better acquainted than Louis XIV, who, without his enormous wig, appeared a very poor creature indeed. The gorgeous costumes worn by public functionaries, nobles, and kings were part of a policy which aimed at making an imposing impression upon the prole- tariat. Humanity like bright-coloured raiment and gor- geous plumes, and the wearer of such finery no doubt reaps some reflected glory. In the East an individual in a position of importance loses prestige if he appears in public slovenly dressed. One of the cleverest of our younger administrators proved a complete failure largely owing to the fact that he was in the habit of dressing in a cap and flannels and riding about Eastern towns on a bicycle. The effect which fine uniforms produce upon the masses is undeniable. I have personally experimented in this direction. When attached to the old Shah of Persia (Nasreddin), during his visit to England some twenty- four years ago, I observed that his reception by the crowds in various manufacturing centres varied from extreme cordiality to complete indifference. The Shah was growing a very old man, and found it more comfortable to abandon a good deal of the gorgeous clothing coats stiff with gold lace, pearls, THE INFLUENCE OF COSTUME 199 and diamonds which had been the traditional garb of his ancestors. The diamond jika, a plume emblematic of sovereignty which is worn in the kola, or lambskin cap, however, still remained an essential part of his state costume, though he did not, as in former days, always wear it. When he drove through the streets. I observed that the reception of the King of Kings and his suite was rather cold some of the Persians, indeed, expressed surprise at the coldness of their reception by the crowd. " Well," said I, " if your Shah were to put on the splendid uniforms he wore during his first visit to Europe, you would find the crowd more enthusiastic ; they come out expecting to see him one blaze of diamonds, and only catch sight of an old gentleman in a black frock-coat and black cap. Make him at least wear his jika and diamond belt with the great emerald clasp." My remonstrances bore fruit, and though the Shah said the diamond-plumed cap made his head ache, he wore it several times during the rest of his trip ; also he wore his. famous diamond belt and other ornaments which were part of his regalia at Teheran. His reception by the populace varied in about direct proportion to the magnificence of his dress, and during the remainder of the tour neither he nor his suite had any reason to be dissatisfied. In connexion with Persian costumes, it would be 200 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS curious to know exactly what the Persian fashion of coat introduced by Charles II was. Some of this king's costumes were artistic in the extreme, and he seems to have had a partiality for subdued colours. A picture which was formerly at Strawberry Hill, represented the Merry Monarch in the customary dark wig, a point-lace cravat and a tasselled hand- kerchief hanging from a low pocket of a brown coat lined with orange. The picture in question representing a most curious incident, seems to have disappeared, inquiries having totally failed to discover where it is. Of small landscape size and very well painted, it showed Rose, Charles II's gardener, presenting the first pineapple raised in England to his royal master. This highly interesting painting, which had been presented to Horace Walpole by Mr. Pennicott, was sold at the Strawberry Hill Sale for 22 is. 6d. in 1859, when it passed into the possession of Mr. Labouchere, afterwards Lord Taunton. Loudon, a great gardener in his day, had be- queathed it to his grandson, who had left it to Mr. Pennicott. The scene of the presentation was laid in a garden with a view of the country house (Dorney Court) to which it belonged, and it must have been a most appropriate picture for a gardener to possess. It is to be hoped that some day this curious painting, a print of which exists, will be rediscovered. The Government, of course, should have bought it. "Well STAGE DRESS 201 might a critic write at the time of its sale : " If our Governments were only as highly cultured as John Rose's pineapple, such a picture could not fail to be in the possession of the nation." The reign of Charles I 1625-48 brought with it what has often been termed the most elegant and picturesque costume ever worn in England. Owing to its being in fashion at the time when Vandyke was painting, it is generally known as the Vandyke dress, which, of all costumes, perhaps, is the one the best. adapted for the stage, and therefore generally selected for such plays as are not fixed by their subject to any particular date. In Mid- Victorian times it was even more popular than it is to-day, and many plays founded on incidents in the reign of Charles II were often acted in cos- tumes of the reign of Charles I. John Kemble, actually hashed up the costumes of 'three reigns those of Elizabeth, James, and Charles to form a conventional costume for the whole of Shakespeare's historical plays from " King John " to " Henry VIII." At any rate this was a distinct artistic advance upon the custom of the eighteenth century, which decreed that Shakespeare should Ije played in the modern costume of the day. Garrick first broke away from convention by wearing a fancy dress for the part of Richard III, but he played Macbeth to the last in a Court suit of sky-blue and scarlet, laced with gold. Kemble's good sense and determined spirit induced him to 202 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS reform this altogether ; and though, to the antiquary, it was as ridiculous to see the " gracious Duncan " in a trunk-hose as in velvet breeches and silk stockings, the absurdity was not so striking to the million, and stage effect was infinitely heightened by the change. One of the most striking symptoms of the deca- dence of modern European male costume is the popularity of the cloth cap, surely the most hideous and inartistic head-covering which the mind of man has ever devised, in addition to which it has the disadvantage of being utterly unsuited for wet weather. Essentially vulgar and plebeian, this cap unredeemed by any single merit except its lightness seems to me to be one of the most suitable signs of the ascendancy which democracy, of necessity devoid of imagination and appreciation of art, has contrived to attain the appanage of an errand-boy of the sixties of the last century, this cap is now quite freely worn by Cabinet Ministers, statesmen, and others, whose predecessors in a more dignified age would have shrunk in horror from any idea of such a kind. Striking and gorgeous crowns were always worn by monarchs of the ancient world, especially in the East. Within the last fifty years, however, the head-dresses of Oriental sovereigns have greatly shrunk in size, the shrinkage in question, in two instances at least, coinciding with the decay and downfall of dominance and world power. These instances are Turkey and Persia. In Turkey, till the reign of Mahmoud II, THE TURBAN 203 huge and picturesque turbans were worn. About 1848, however, the Sultan of that day led the way in discarding the stately and dignified old robes which had been worn by the Turks ever since Mahomet II had captured Constantinople, at the same time adopting the somewhat meaningless fez in the place of the beautiful old turban. The sartorial revolution which ensued produced what may be called " the bottle-of- Bordeaux Ottoman " his closely buttoned black surtout re- presenting the body of the bottle and his fez the red-sealed cork. A huge turban of shawls was also generally worn in Persia up to the fall of the Sefavee monarchy, on the capture of Ispahan by the Afghans in the eighteenth century ; but when the Kadjars had managed to capture the throne they brought the black kola, or astrakhan cap, into general use, its shape varying from time to time. To-day, when his country seems to have fallen into a most -pitiable state of impotence and anarchy, the high Persian official sports a small black cloth cap, which is a mere shadow of the original Kadjar kola, which, under Fathi AH Shah, was of considerable height. Quite lately China, or at least those Chinese sympathizing with the spread of modern ideas, have taken to substituting the hideous European cloth cap for its ancient picturesque and appropriate head- dress, the substitution in question, as in other cases, coinciding with social anaichy and complete loss of world power. 204 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS The case of Japan, where a large number of the inhabitants now wear cloth caps, is, however, widely different, for in that country, before the advent of Western ideas, the populace at large wore no hats at all ; this was probably in a great measure due to the elaborate way in which the hair of a Japanese was arranged, before the craze for European costume was inaugurated by those at the head of affairs. In this instance, therefore, there has been no re- linquishing of any historical head-dress, but merely the assumption of a singularly inartistic and vulgar article of costume, absorbed together with many other things and ideas some good, many bad from that Western world with which the old Japanese declined to have any intercourse or dealings. The adoption of Western clothes by the subjects of the Mikado has been defended on the grounds of expediency for working purposes, there is no doubt, a loose jacket is more convenient than a flowing- robe with long sleeves. It is, in my opinion, a highly significant symptom of the low estimation in which, at heart, the modern world holds true culture, that the passing of beautiful national costume, the design of which, unlike the arbitrary creations of costumiers and tailors has gradually evolved, should evoke scarcely an expression of genuine regret. Quite recently, when the so-called Chinese Republic was proclaimed, not a protest was made against the adoption of the frock-coat and top-hat and European uniforms in place of the highly artistic and beautifully CHANGING CHINA 205 embroidered robes which for centuries had been the recognized dress of Chinese officialdom. The run upon the Western cloth cap, probably the most com- plete manifestation of sartorial degradation, which many of the lower-class Chinese immediately took to substituting for their own very appropriate and not unpicturesque head-gear, was even said to be highly satisfactory as promoting the interests of European traders. At the same time the illustrated papers complacently published pictures showing Chinese officials in their new garb, as if this development (in reality a retrogression) were a matter for congratulation. The far-reaching effects which this lamentable change must have upon the general culture of the people of China cannot be otherwise than bad. To begin with, a whole class of designers and embroiderers find their occupation gone, in addition to which the disappearance of the ancient costumes must inevitably convey an impression to the populace that an essential part of the new civilization which they are to adopt is complete indifference to colour and design. For military purposes, on active service at least, China has no doubt been well advised to adopt a thoroughly workmanlike dress ; but for official occa- sions surely the gorgeous old robes should have been preserved. A wise measure, which would have shown the world that the young Republic sincerely desired to be in the forefront of true civilization, would have been the institution of a special department to see that Chinese art, as applied to ordinary things and to the costume of the people, should be fostered and 206 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS developed to its utmost extent. As it is, every effort seems to be made to induce the populace to equip themselves in the trappings of our own squalid East End.. It is a most unfortunate thing that the mania of Oriental nations for adopting European dress should have arisen just at the very time when Western male costume has developed into the most inartistic and hideous form ever devised. From the point of view of real civilization, there is something especially depressing about the recent adoption of Western costume in China. A French visitor to Yuan Shi Kai recently noted, with disgust, that not only was the Chinese President rigged out in a khaki uniform, but the room in which he received visitors was entirely European in style and had not a single Chinese thing in it. This at a time when cultured and wealthy Western people are searching eagerly for Chinese works of art ! The adoption of European costume by ladies of the Japanese Court about 1886 (in which year the Empress Haruko first appeared in a costume fabri- cated by some modiste of Berlin) was, from an artistic point of view, lamentable in the extreme. Pierre Loti has admirably described the charming appearance which the consort of the late Mikado and her ladies presented at the last official garden party before the change. For some time before this horrible piece of bar- barism was decided upon, the Japanese Court had been trained in an adaptation of Western ceremonial, VULGARIZING JAPAN 207 a German lady having been imported to revise the ancient manners and ways. The adoption of Western dress, against which, to her honour, Mrs. Cleveland, the wife of the then President of the United States, made a tactful protest, was the natural outcome of this German influence and of the unfortunate mania of the Japanese for imitating any modes and customs which chance to catch their fancy. After the Empress had assumed a garb which invariably disfigures and vulgarizes the women of her race, a great craze for Western costumes seized the ladies connected with the Court, the more so as an order, still, I fear, in force, rigorously prescribed Western dress on all official occasions. The inno- vation not infrequently produced ludicrous effects ; the Japanese, unused as they were to tight bodices and the other paraphernalia connected with Western fashions, made all sorts of ludicrous mistakes. Stays in Old Japan, much to the profit of the national health, quite unknown were occasionally worn upside down underneath bodices of thick red plush and the like. At official banquets where the poor little ladies had to sit on chairs, some of them would occasionally be seen furtively drawing up their legs till they reached the more comfortable position beneath them, which for untold ages has been the national method of squatting on the spotless Japanese floors. To me these Japanese women, tricked out in European dress, seemed so dreadful that 1 always avoided seeing them as much as possible. It gave 208 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS me much the same impression as would a beautiful work of art pasted over with cheap machine-made scraps of t tawdry decoration. When I lived with a friend at Nikko, I was one day, in our garden, appalled by coming across what I at first took for a large monkey dressed up in a short red flannel skirt, thick blue stockings, and shoes. I immediately sent for our major-domo, and asked him the meaning of the horrible apparition outside. Bowing in the customary manner, he told me that the parents of his little niece had scraped together enough money to buy her a European dress, and thinking to please us (for we encouraged all children to come and play around our house) he had bidden her come and show herself in her new costume. After sharply telling him that if such an outrage ever occurred again he would have to leave our service, and delivering a brief but forcible lecture on the horror and barbarism of copying bad Western things, I gave him a present for the child and told him to tell her to buy a good obi (the beautiful broad girdle which is such an essential part of a Japanese woman's costume), and, in return, burn the ridiculous travesty which had spoilt my morning. My order was obeyed, and during the rest of our stay the little lady never appeared before us unless dressed in the graceful robes so admirably suited to the face, figure, and gait of the gentle and charming women of Japan. At the present time I understand there is a distinct tendency among the cultured class in Japan to revert to their old and picturesque costume photographs THE MIKADO 209 of the present Emperor and Empress in ancient Court costumes have even been reproduced in English illus- trated papers ; for state functions, however, Western garb has still to be worn. The spectacle of a Japanese in a cocked hat is as strange a sight as a Highlander wearing a pigtail. Why on earth such a clever people as the Japanese should ever have adopted the head-gear which our ancestors wore in the eighteenth century is quite inconceivable. Our generals, diplomats, and other high functionaries retain it because it has been handed down to us from the past. The ancestors of the Japanese, however, would never have dreamt of wearing such a head-dress, which is therefore meaning- less, and must be worn merely from the idea of aping other nations. The late Mikado, I believe, after 1868, only put on the full dress worn by his ancestors three times every year, on which occasions he went through a solemn religious ceremonial before the shrine of his ances- tors. Though in public he invariably wore uniform, in his private apartments he adhered to a pure white kimono. These kimonos were never worn more than once ; when taken off, they were given to various Court functionaries, who set great store upon such gifts. It is curious to observe that in their funerals the Japanese still adhere to the fashions of their ancestors. Few of the ancient ceremonies were omitted at the burial of the late Mikado, whose illness had inspired such fanatical devotion. 210 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Four days before his death, when all hope seemed pretty well gone, a middle-aged woman committed suicide, wishing to give her life for that of her Imperial master. Instances of fanatical devotion to Mutsushito were quite common among the Japanese people. Just before the close of his reign a local stationmaster killed himself because the Mikado's train had been delayed for half an hour. General Nogi performed his final act of self- sacrifice in national costume. I do not, however, know whether he donned the special ceremonial dress worn by those about to commit hara-kiri in Old Japan. It was strange to see how the news of the General's self- dispatch, so totally alien to the modern spirit, was received in Europe. On the whole the attitude of most people was, I fancy, one of puzzled admiration. In Japan itself his heroic sacrifice provoked neither astonishment nor regret. During the war with Russia the stern old warrior a Samurai of Samurais and his wife, though passion- ately devoted to their two sons, had actually gloried in their bereavement when death snatched both boys away while they were campaigning. Not a tear fell from the weather-beaten old General's face when they brought him the news that his second and last son had given his life for his country before Port Arthur " I am glad," said he, "that he has died with honour!" The overwhelming majority of the Japanese deemed TO THAT BOURNE .... 211 Count Nogi's suicide a magnificent deed and a fine patriotic act of self-devotion. Speaking of what according to Western ideas was a deplorable tragedy, a Japanese gentleman, labouring under deep emotion, said, "You in England cannot understand it, but we can." General Nogi and his wife were old. Their children had died in the service of Japan and the Emperor, and when the latter passed away, no doubt there seemed to them nothing more to live for. Accordingly they decided, after the example of their brave ancestors, to accompany their lord on his last great journey. Europe may not approve, but it must at least bow in respectful silence before the unfathomable and heroic spirit which prompted these two brave hearts to seek a tragic end. VIII UNIFORMS OLD AND NEW FASHION, if she has ceased to exercise as much influence as of yore over masculine clothes, is still paramount where uniform is concerned. The history of military costume as told by old pictures and prints is very curious and interesting, its cut, colour, and design have varied at different epochs in much the same style as woman's dress. From the beginning of the nineteenth century to about 1850 the coatee ruled supreme ; the tunic was then introduced in France and spread all over Europe. The triumph of the Germans in 1870 caused us to discard the infantry shako for the present hideous helmet. At the present time khaki, a mud-coloured cloth, is having a great vogue, all ornamentation being suppressed. I am convinced that had the people of the eighteenth century found it expedient to dress their soldiers in this sad-coloured stuff, they would have evolved a uniform which would at least have possessed some striking and distinctive features of MILITARY COLLECTORS 213 its own. The khaki costume now in use is, indeed, scarcely a uniform at all ; anything less inspiriting than a regiment dressed in this gloomy convict garb it is impossible to conceive. The wars of past ages though, like all wars, full of horrors, were at least not wanting in an element of the picturesque. The wars of the future, on the other hand, seem likely to be merely a contest of death-dealing machines managed by individuals clothed in the most depress- ing style that human ingenuity has ever been able to devise. It is a relief to turn from the unattractive fighting dress of modern armies to prints and pictures represent- ing the fine and artistically designed uniforms of the past. At the present time, when all sorts of hitherto unconsidered trifles are eagerly sought for, it is strange that so few devote their energies to collecting prints of old military uniforms, badges, belt-plates and other ornamental relics of armies which have marched away for ever. In France, setting aside the splendid assemblage of relics at the Invalides, there have been many great collections of this kind, notably that of the late M. Detaille, which, by the terms of his will, is to be thrown open to public view. In this country, private collectors seem rather to have overlooked this highly interesting field. Major-General Terry formed a fine collection of military prints, as did the late Mr. Milne, whose books and pictures, forming a most valuable record of the British Army, were not very 214 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS long ago dispersed at Messrs. Sotheby's, where a three days' sale realized something over ^"8,000. The study of past military dress, while highly instructive from an historical point of view, cannot fail to demonstrate the artistic taste with which even the military tailors of other days were imbued. Their often admirable designs indeed make one realize how pitiful are the efforts of their successors of to-day, who, considering the large amount of money spent on uniforms in the majority of instances, produce but meaningless and gaudy effects. Nations which spend enormous sums upon their armies should at least get as much value as possible for their gold and take care that the parade dress of their soldiery, in addition to being ornamental, should be designed upon principles which should demonstrate the con- tinuity of national history. Germany, it is true, though she has adopted the comparatively new-fangled spiked helmet or Pickel- haube, seems to have in some degree realized the value of such an idea, the dress of the army, especially as regards certain details, bearing traces of evolution from that worn by the soldiers of Frederick the Great. The Pickelhaube itself has now also its traditions, for this not very ornamental head-dress was generally worn in the war of 1870, when the victories of William I laid the foundations of the powerful German Empire which we see to-day. France, on the other hand, except for her Cuiras- siers, which, notwithstanding modern ideas, she still THE PANTALON ROUGE 215 retains partly, I fancy, because they are so closely connected with glorious episodes of her national history clothes her soldiers in a very slovenly manner ; the red trousers, it should be added, though now regarded as an essential characteristic of the infantry dress, possess very little historic interest. They were first worn by the French Army about the time of the Algerian campaign and never formed part of the uniform of Napoleon's veterans, who were clothed entirely in blue. The army of the old French kings, or at least a portion of it, wore white, a colour which did not commend itself to Napoleon because he considered that it showed blood-stains too conspicuously, and so led to the demoralization of troops when in action. The knapsacks of the French and German Armies were made of calf-skins, tanned with the hair left on. They shed the rain better than those formed of plain leather, and they were not so much affected by heat and cold as those made of waterproof fabrics, because the hair is a good non-conductor. The French cavalry helmet, the design of which is similar to that worn at Waterloo, has been pro- nounced by modern experts to be the best and most practical cavalry head-dress in existence ; in fact, only a year or two ago there was an idea of giving the whole of the French cavalry, including the Hussars and Chasseurs, some form of it. French explorers, it may not be generally known, have been in the habit of bestowing military head-dresses upon friendly native chiefs as badges of honour. At the present 216 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS day the chief of a certain tribe in French Africa, as confirmation of authority over his people, receives from France the cocked hat of a French general, which, on ceremonial occasions, he wears over his primitive coiffure. This custom of giving natives military head-dresses as symbols of rulership must have been practised by French explorers for a long series of past years. A friend of mine, who did much rough work pushing his way into the interior on the East Coast, told me that during a punitive expedition he found in a village, to the best of his knowledge hitherto unvisited by Europeans, a beau- tifully fashioned French cuirassier helmet, which from his description -would appear to have once formed part of the equipment of an officer of Napoleon's army. While in its design it followed that still worn by the French Cuirassiers, its details were highly finished, whilst the ornamentation showed that it had been carried out by some skilled and artistic crafts- man. To my very great regret my friend went on to say that in the presence- of the vanquished inhabi- . tants of this village he had had this beautiful work of art hacked into little pieces, it being necessary to impress them with the idea that their ruler's power to work his destructive way was for ever broken. In all probability the helmet in question had been given to the tribe many years before by one of some adventurous French officers who had first penetrated into this unexplored part of the country. Cast-off military trappings and costumes are highly valued by savage and semi-civilized States. A con- A QUEER REGIMENT 217 siderable trade, I believe, is done in second-hand uniforms of every kind. A good customer for dealers in this sort of thing must be the Ameer of Afghanistan, who has a com- plete regiment of cavalry dressed in the cast-off garb of guards of our various lines of railway. The ap- pearance of this corps upon parade, with its diver- sified insignia, " L.B.S.C.," " L.N.W.R.," and the like emblazoned upon various portions of its equip- ment, is said to be indescribably quaint. Of late years many officers have told me that they consider uniforms mere useless survivals of the past good only to go to balls in. According to some, all regiments should be dressed alike in that joyless convict garb "khaki," an inconspicuous plume or badge alone serving to distinguish a regiment from its fellows. The soldier, in short, is to be equipped merely as a drab unit in a general scheme of un- emotional scientific butchery. Old-fashioned war was a fever full of vivid, if wild and disordered, dreams. Modern war is to be a sort of ague which kills as much by dull leaden depression as by any- thing else. When the world has reached such a pitch as this, it is undoubtedly time that wars should cease altogether. It is impossible to imagine that any khaki-clad conqueror of the future, swordless, wearing a hygienic cap and probably goggles to guard his eyes from the sun, will ever go down to history as has done Napoleon in his famous cocked hat and effective uniform of the Chasseurs of the Guard. 218 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Khaki, though undoubtedly a useful and workman- like dress, cannot be called an inspiriting garb, or one calculated to promote esprit de corps ; there can be little doubt but that the adoption of this hideous material is largely responsible for the Territorial breakdown. The marches out of the old Volunteers in full dress produced many recruits. It was a fine thing to see a smart corps swing along, the band at its head, and civilian friends stepping out to the music by the side of the regiment. About the Territorials, on the other hand, there is little of the brighter side of soldiering no pageantry, and no smart uniform to attract recruits. The whole Territorial system, indeed, well-thought- out and clearly devised as it undoubtedly is, takes little account of human nature, which is the main reason that it has proved such a failure. The authorities apparently are at last beginning to remember that red coats have always proved an attraction to men not indisposed to join the Army, for attempts have recently been made to promote recruit- ing in Birmingham by granting extra pay to soldiers who wear their uniform on furlough. The value of a smart uniform as an inducement to enlist was generally recognized in the past. The Times of September 25, 1801, contained an advertisement addressed to young men likely to join the Light Dragoons. Among the attractions specified were the prospect of being mounted " on the finest horses in the world, wearing superb clothing and the richest accoutrements. MARTIAL MUSIC 219 Your pay and privileges " (so ran this appeal) " equal two guineas a week ; you are everywhere respected ; your society is courted ; you are admired by the fair, which, together with the chance of getting switched to a buxom widow or brushing with a rich heiress, renders the situation truly enviable and delightful." Not content with garbing our soldiers like convicts, there have been suggestions of late years that military bands should cease to exist. A more ridiculous suggestion was never made. Napoleon, the greatest master of war who ever lived, attached extraordinary importance to martial music. Before a battle he always caused his bands to strike up airs recalling the memories of many vic- tories, and the cries of "Vive l'Empe>eur!" which followed clearly showed what an effect this produced upon the spirits of his men. The bands of the Austrian Army have always been noted for their' excellence. The big drum used to be carried on a sort of little trolly drawn by dogs, and up to about the sixties of the last century the bandmasters always wore a white feathered tricorne as a badge of their office. Military music is essential in an efficient army, and were bands to be abolished it would certainly not be for long. The experiment made some years ago by General Thibaudin, who did away with the traditional French drummer because he said he took too long to train, proved a complete failure, and at the present time every* French regiment of infantry 220 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS has its roll of drums as of yore. The glories of the tambour major, who was such a conspicuous figure during the Second Empire, have, however, not yet been revived. Under the Second Empire the Paris streets were rendered gay by the multitude of varied and brilliant uniforms. Stately Cent Gardes, with their shining casques, their buckskins, and their jack-boots ; soldiers of the Guides, rivalling in the tight fit of their jackets and overalls, and the abundance of their embroidery, our Hussars of the Regency ; Grenadiers, Voltigeurs, Chasseurs, Eclaireurs, Zouaves, Sapeurs, cantinieres of the Imperial Guard, Chasseurs de Vincennes, Chasseurs d'Afrique, Spahis, Turcos. Of splendid appearance also were the Dragons de 1'Imperatrice, a regiment most of the younger officers of which were dashing viveurs. Only a few years ago I found on the floor of my bedroom at Trouville, where it must have lain for many years, one of the pretty buttons of that vanished regiment. Napoleon III naturally did all he could to keep alive the military traditions connected with his great uncle, and therefore created a new Imperial Guard. The costume of this corps did not exactly resemble that worn by the famous old soldiers who had formed the backbone of La Grande Arme'e the huge bonnet a poil grenadier cap, was, however, retained. The little Prince Imperial, curiously enough, entertained an extraordinary aversion for this AN OBNOXIOUS CAP 221 picturesque head-dress. As a child in 1863, after having been promoted to the rank of corporal of the Imperial Guard, he went to a review of his regiment with the fur cap replaced by the light kfyi, still, though altered in shape, worn by French infantry, and also by schoolboys. As the trumpet sounded for the commencement of the review, Madame Bruat, who had held the grenadier cap upon her knees ready for this opportunity, imme- diately began to remove the ktpi, in order to substitute the head-dress belonging to the uniform he wore. But the action gave rise to such a storm of indignation, such a burst of rage and anger, such shrieking and screaming on the part of the little hero, that, had resistance to his wishes been main- tained, the most dire results might have occurred. As it was, nothing happened more serious than throwing the offensive grenadier's cap far out among the crowd of soldiers. Good-humour was restored with the replacing of the ktpi, and the usual demure and quiet demeanour of the little Prince was notice- able for the remainder of the day. To-day, like the great tambour majors and the gorgeous Hussars with their furred pelisses and heavily plumed caps, the Imperial Guard is but a picturesque memory. The Cuirassiers, however, still exist, and to the unconcealed amazement of foreign military critics still retain their cuirasses made at the Creusot works and supposed to be sufficiently strong to turn a bullet. For the cuirassier and dragoon helmet with long 222 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS horsetail hanging behind, the modern French, indeed, appear to have a great affection. Quite recently it was reported that a helmet closely resembling that worn by heavy cavalry during the Monarchy of July was to be adopted for the gendarmerie, who, since the abolition of their picturesque cocked hat (worn en bataille in Napoleonic fashion) some dozen years ago or so, have had to content themselves with the unpretentious kfyi. The helmet which they are to wear is not unlike that worn under the Second Empire by the Cent Gardes, a picked body of men, who were more of a personal bodyguard of the Emperor and Empress than anything else, and disappeared with the Im- perial Court. The dress of this famous cohort, who, motionless as statues, lined the grand staircase of the Tuileries on gala days, was probably the most ornate cavalry uniform ever worn. The equipment of these giants included silvery casques and flowing plumes, sky-blue tunics and pink facings, bright steel cuirasses and golden epaulettes and aiguillettes, spotless gaunt- lets and buckskins, lustrous jack-boots and embroidered hammercloths. The last colonel wrote an interesting history of the corps. The light blue of the Cent Gardes was very likely suggested by the white formerly worn by the French Army of the ancien regime. Though very attractive-looking when new, on service it produced a bad effect ; except in the crack regiments the men were ragged and dirty. White is a difficult colour to keep clean one of the reasons, no doubt, why Austria abandoned its CARNOT 223 white tunics in the sixties of the last century. After the Revolution (though the troops in the earlier battles fought by the young French Republic were dressed in pretty well anything they could find) blue came to be adopted as the national colour. About the most picturesque innovation at that time was the huge plume of tricolour feathers which surmounted the hats of general officers. Such a frivolous, if ornamental, head-dress was worn by the serious-minded Carnot, " far-planning, imperturbable, and indomitable," who organized vic- tory by means of his cool mathematical head and iron, indomitable will. It is said that the direction of the movements of sometimes as many as fourteen armies at once were controlled by him. This true patriot and gentleman was a poet as well as a writer on military tactics, geometry, and mechanics. He was, besides, a man of great personal courage, as was proved by his leading on foot an attacking column of the army which forced the Austrians to raise the siege of Maubeuge. With the rise of Napoleon to power less laxity was allowed in the dress of the French Army, David and other artists being specially called in to design uniforms for certain specially selected regiments. The infantry of the time received the shako in lieu of the plumed cocked hat, while various new corps, such as Lancers, were called into being. The great value, of imposing head-gear as a means of impressing the populace appealed to Napoleon, who gave his soldiers the most stupendous plumed hats 224 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS which the world has ever seen. In addition to this the cocked hats of his staff, worn fore and aft, were enor- mous, forming at the same time a most effective con- trast to his own bicorne (always worn en bataille], which has come down to us almost as part of the personality of the Great Captain. Though Napoleon himself wore a uniform of great simplicity, the cost of which, I believe, did not exceed fifteen pounds, he liked to be surrounded by a bril- liantly dressed staff. Most of his generals vied with one another in gorgeousness of dress. One or two, however, paid little attention to their appearance notably General Count Dejeau, one of the Emperor's aides-de-camp. This gallant soldier was a keen entomologist and never lost an opportunity of acquiring any rare speci- men, being continually occupied in collecting insects and fastening them with pins on the outside of his cocked hat, which was always covered with them. The Emperor, as well as the whole army, was accus- tomed to see General Dejeau's head thus singularly ornamented, even when in battle. But the departed spirits of those murdered insects once had their revenge on him ; for in the battle of Wagram, in 1809, and while he was at the side of Napoleon, a shot from the enemy struck Dejeau's head and precipitated him senseless from his horse. Soon, however, recovering from the shock, and being asked by the Emperor if he were still alive, he answered, " I am not dead ; but, alas ! my insects are all gone ! " for his hat was literally torn to pieces. SCIENTIFIC BUTCHERY 225 General Dejeau, however, was an exception, for those were the halcyon days of uniform, and no troops ever marched to battle in braver array than the armies of the First Empire. It would seem, indeed, that he considered pomp and ceremony in- dispensable to successful soldiery. For uniforms intended to protect his troops from observation, the Emperor had the most profound dis- like and contempt. At one time some well-meaning officer (probably of much the same mental type as some of our military faddists of the present day) actually devised a uniform for the Emperor which should make him less conspicuous among his staff. The petit caporal, however, would have none of it. " If," said he, "I were to go in for this kind of thing, I had much better give up going to war at all." Not for an instant would he even consider such an idea, continuing to wear his green coat and little cocked hat and to be accompanied by a brilliant staff. A fundamental principle of his military policy, indeed, lay in fostering a certain pomp and display. This, however, be it remarked, was always in good taste, for the uniforms of his armies, as has already been mentioned, were designed by first-class artists, and the Emperor himself had a fine sense of what was fitting and picturesque. War, and especially successful war, is after all based upon nothing but sentiment, and its conversion into scientific butchery, as it were, knocks the bottom out of the whole idea. Napoleon well understood this, and, in consequence, did everything possible to 226 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS make his armies as splendid and imposing as he could. The lofty plumes which crowned the shakos of the Grande Armee were, it should be added, not devised entirely for the sake of producing an im- posing appearance, something of a utilitarian idea being also connected with them. In those days of firing at close range it was said that a body of troops equipped in very high shakos with tall plumes had a better chance of escaping bullets fired from very unreliable muskets than soldiers wearing small caps. In the heat of battle, amidst volumes of smoke, the aim of those firing a volley became confused, and it was difficult to distinguish exactly where the man ended and his head-dress began. Another reason which no doubt prompted the Great Conqueror to favour gigantic bearskins, gor- geously plumed helmets, and huge shakos was the attraction which such trappings have always had for the people at large. During quite recent years a similar consideration has caused the Russian military authorities to restore to certain regiments the head- dresses which they wore a hundred years ago, while at the same time adopting a modification of the uniforms of the same period. One of the high officials responsible for this change, to which at one time he had been opposed, assured me that in practice it had proved the greatest success. Putting aside the fact that the initial cost, contrary to general opinion, is no more than that of the ordinary modern equipment, and that, owing to the pride of the soldier in his M. DETAILLE 227 picturesque kit, it lasts longer, thanks to the care bestowed upon it, this change had done much to make the army popular among the people. About two years ago the French military authorities, after a short trial of a reseda-coloured uniform, designed, like khaki, to save troops from being observed, decided to reclothe the French infantry in a more attractive dress. The task of preparing designs was confided to the late M. Detaille, an expert on such matters, who, of all men, one would have imagined was best fitted for the task. The result, however, was not satisfactory, the main objection to his scheme being a rather ugly helmet of Cromwellian type, which he named " La Bourgui- gnote." The new tunic, more ornamental than the old, revived some of the features of the dress of the Voltigeurs of the Second Empire. Worn in conjunction with putties (which the artist had adopted from the English model), the general effect was not good. Owing, indeed, to the criticisms which the new equip- ment evoked, it was not carried out much, I believe, to the mortification of the designer. It was said by some that the rejection of his designs hastened M. Detaille's death. In spite of the failure of our friends across the Channel to evolve a satisfactory dress for their troops, there is no doubt it could have been done had only old uniforms been judiciously adapted. Would that our English uniforms could be re- modelled upon the lines which were followed in the past ! Within the present year a very sensible minor 228 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS change has been made in infantry dress. Since about 1872 up to quite recently privates and non-com- missioned officers of line regiments wore shoulder- straps of the same colour as their tunic. At the present time, however, the shoulder-straps are of the same colour as regimental facings, the result, from a decorative point of view, being eminently satisfactory. Old facings have also been restored to certain regiments within the last few years. On the whole, indeed, those responsible for the clothing of the British Army have shown a little more sense than their immediate predecessors. This being so, and some slight desire to restore some of the picturesque features of parade uniforms appearing to exist, it seems strange that there is no idea of reviving the convenient and artistic costume which was worn by general officers during the earlier portion of the last century. At that time, unlike the vast majority of the army, general officers wore no epaulettes or wings, one rich aiguillette worn on the right shoulder being the peculiar and highly ornamental appanage of their rank. In place of the tunic now in use, such officers sported a coatee, cut somewhat more gradually away than that of other ranks ; a double row of buttons and a sash worn in the same manner as to-day completed a very comfort- able equipment, which accorded admirably with the cocked hat and feathers, which, in spite of much unmerited abuse, in an altered and smaller form, happily still survive. While our uniforms are always undergoing a process THE SLASH 229 of simplification, strangely enough their cost does not appear to show any substantial decrease. I have not the bills before me, but I would willingly wager that the full-dress uniform of a subaltern of the Grenadier Guards of to-day is far more costly than that of his predecessor of a hundred years ago. In spite of this, the dress of a lieutenant of that age was far more ornamental and artistic than that now in use, besides which, it embraced several traditional features closely connected with the history of English military costume. The gorget (abolished about 1830), an ornament of comparatively small cost, represented the last remnant of the armour worn by mediaeval soldiers ; the sash not a mere piece of ribbon as at present was a real sash of considerable dimensions, of hygienic value in cold weather, and besides, at a pinch, capable of being used to bear a wounded man off the field of battle. To-day the Guards regiments, almost alone, retain the slash with buttons on their sleeve. This, it is true, is a relic of old military costume ; but in 1812 they wore the far less expensive and more historical turn-over cuff with buttons, which the band of one regiment of Guards still retains in a modified form. Within the last few years, it is pleasant to note, the Royal Marine Light Infantry have had the slash restored to them. It is to be hoped that other distin- guished regiments will before long be accorded a like privilege. The bearskin (contrary to ordinary belief, light, comfortable, and a perfect protection against sunstroke), 230 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS within the last hundred years has shed nearly all the ornamentation which in former days relieved its fur. Except in the Scots Guards (in 1812 merely the 3rd Guards), the plume, it is true, remains, but the picturesque front plate, the cords, tassels, and cloth patch at back, a relic of the original top, have one by one gradually disappeared. The front plate (abolished about 1838) was probably discarded from an idea that it pressed too heavily upon the foreheads of the men ; but surely, as in Fusilier regiments, some light badge might have been retained, while, for full dress, the picturesque gold cords, contrasting so admirably with the dark fur, might well form part of an officer's equipment. The return to the simple and artistic old-fashioned gauntlet cuff with buttons, far less richly embroidered with gold than the present one, would be a considerable economy ; in addition to this, if officers were obliged to purchase their uniforms in a rational manner, the epaulette, once such a distin- guishing feature of their dress, might, at very small additional expense, take the place of the meaningless shoulder-strap. No infantry has ever worn such a hideous and unpractical head-dress as the cloth helmet. Some little time ago designs for a shako were under con- sideration, and it was almost decided to issue a certain pattern in lieu of the helmet. The present Minister for War, I believe, put his veto upon the idea. Though a man of great personal bravery, like most modern politicians he is timid about doing anything likely to arouse criticism. TO BLUE 231 At present, when the design of officers' uniforms and equipment is entirely in the hands of army tailors, any changes, good or bad, undoubtedly entail serious inroads upon the pockets of those who lead our men. The whole system is iniquitous to an inconceivable degree. If the authorities are really desirous of assisting economy, why do they not (as prevails in efficiently managed armies) institute a special de- partment of the army clothing factory, from which officers should be obliged to purchase all uniforms at the very moderate figure at which a properly managed tailoring department could easily supply them? To combat the vast and costly influence of the army tailors seems, however, to be an almost superhuman task ; their power to-day, indeed, is probably little less than in 1856, at which date it was openly said that they alone were responsible for changing the colour of the 6th Dragoon Guards (the Carabiniers) to blue. When this entirely unnecessary change, made, it would seem, merely to put money into certain West End tradesmen's pockets, was effected, some outspoken people did not hesitate to say that certain officials shared in the profits which resulted from every officer being compelled to purchase an entirely new equipment. This, however, was possibly mere malicious talk, it being more likely that certain officers of high rank and straitened means did not dislike assenting to anything calculated to please the tailors and cause them to be lax about sending in their bills. Be this as it may, for years past there has been, 232 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS and still is to-day, a kindly feeling towards sartorial pockets in the hearts of those who are constantly making alterations in British officers' dress. The Carabiniers, of course, were so called from the fire-arm they carried. Their embodiment began in James II's time, and they were formed into regiments in the reign of William III. They \vore breast and back plates, and iron skull-caps sewn in the crowns of their hats. They were armed with swords, and carried pistols in holsters, the carbine being slung behind by a belt. A curious thing is that during the Indian Mutiny the Carabiniers wore their brass helmets in action, though they were without any other cover or pro- tection against the sun. Contrary to what might be imagined, there were very few cases of sunstroke, the burnished surface of the elaborate head-dresses apparently causing the rays of the sun to deflect. The fifties of the last century, when the gallant regiment mentioned above had the colour of its uniform altered for no reason at all, was essentially an era of sartorial change. It was then that the coatee was replaced by the tunic, then that epaulettes most handsome of military ornaments ceased to be worn, and then that the Hussars were stripped of their traditional pelisse. For a time, indeed, it seemed as if no old uniforms would be spared. In September, 1858, an announcement appeared in the papers to the effect that it was intended to deprive the warders of the Tower of the rich costume which SILENT BANDS 233 they had worn since the days of Henry VIII. They were no longer to appear in scarlet and gold, adding to the pomp of a royal procession or state visit. They were to wear, in future, a blue tunic with scarlet facings and a pair of blue cloth trousers with a red stripe. The velvet bonnets were not to under- go any alteration. This change was announced to be caused by considerations of economy, the old uniform having cost the country ^52 per man. Happily, in the end the fine old yeomen were allowed to retain their smart uniform at least on state occasions. I am sure the stately and imposing effect produced by their old-world dress is well worth the money which it costs the country. The expense of the English Army is greater than that of any other, but the British taxpayer gets very little display for his money. Military bands, it is true, play in the parks at fixed times, but now that the Volunteers have been abolished, it is rarely that a regiment is seen marching through the street with its band at its head. Those responsible for the mise en scene on festival occasions seem, in these days, not to be very happy in their methods. After the recent review of the Guards, when the King was returning to Buckingham Palace the road- way through Green Park was naturally thronged by a crowd which had been unable to obtain an entrance to Hyde Park. The King and his staff closely preceded the band of one battalion, which, however, did not play, but 234 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS carried its instruments. The effect was not good, and I heard murmurs of disapprobation from working people who had sacrificed half a day's pay to come and see the troops go by. It may be urged that the musicians were tired from playing in Hyde Park, but surely one band should have been held in reserve, in order that the return from the review might take place to the sound of martial music. On the occasion of the visit of the French President the musical arrangements were somewhat more en- livening. Outside St. James's Palace, just before M. Poincar returned from the Mansion House, the excellent band of the King's Royal Rifle Corps delighted an expectant crowd with the " Gaby Glide," to which some of the spectators, presumably under the impression that the tune in question was the French National Anthem, listened hat in hand. Up to about twenty-six years ago the privates of the Guards, and, indeed, of all regiments, wore their full-dress head-dress when walking out on Sundays an admirable custom which imparted a little picturesqueness to our streets. Suddenly, however, from reasons of economy, soldiers were ordered to wear their undress caps as on ordinary days ; and so the British public, which pays more heavily than any other nation for an army which affords less spectacular show than any other in the world, was robbed of this slight return for the enormous sums spent in inartistic uniforms. Almost the only time at which the public is granted a glimpse of the elaborate head-dresses for which it THE FEATHER BONNET 235 pays is during strikes, the idea of the authorities being, of course, to afford protection to the soldiers against brickbats and other missiles. A very good effect was produced during the last great railway strike by the bearskins of the Guards worn in conjunction with khaki. For once this depressing garb looked quite soldier-like, its essentially unmilitary appearance being redeemed by the bear- skin cap. The whole thing would have formed an excellent subject for a sketch by Detaille. On the other hand, khaki does not go well with the kilt, that important feature of a Highlander's dress, which some have declared to be of comparatively modern origin. Be this as it may, the tartan, which is now so characteristically Scotch, is almost certainly derived from the variously coloured garment of the Gauls described by Diodorus. At one time this was the ordinary garb of every Celtic tribe. The feather bonnet is not very much more than a hundred years old, having originated from Highland soldiers sticking ostrich feathers in their caps. Old or new, however, it is certainly the most handsome military head-dress ever devised. Let us hope that our gallant Highland regiments will never cease to wear it. In the early eighties of the last century it was in great danger, and had it not been for Queen Victoria would have disappeared. Happily she stoutly refused to sanction the adoption of some new-fangled head-dress submitted for her approval. 236 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS It is to be regretted that she ever consented to the introduction of the ridiculous so-called Terri- torial system, introduced in 1881, which, for some unknown reason, entailed the abolition of the practical regimental numbers associated with a glorious past, and gave nothing but long-winded and inconvenient appellations in return. It was well known that the Duke of Cambridge, Commander-in-Chief at that time, deeply deplored this change. However, he made no serious effort to oppose it, the real cause of this being that the consti- tutional spirit which had become part of Queen Victoria's nature and was as the breath of his nostrils to the late King, in the main dominated the Duke, who on several occasions acquiesced in much that he cordially detested merely because the Constitution of the realm demanded it. For this reason, although most distrustful of so-called reforms, during his career he accepted various periodic revolutions which at heart deeply grieved him. Though the harm done to esprit de corps by the introduction of the cumbersome so-called Territorial system was almost irreparable, great good might still be effected by giving numbers to the regiments as they stand now. By such an arrangement the first twenty-five regi- ments would recover their original numbers. In any scheme of this sort certain distinguished regiments, such as the 6oth, 42nd, and others, might well be allowed to resume their old nomenclature. At the same time, if it should seem advisable, there would be FAMOUS REGIMENTS 237 no objection to the present long-winded and often inappropriate titles being retained in the Army List side by side with the far more convenient and historical numbering. The present familiar names of the regiments com- prising the British Army commenced in the reign of Charles II. The Life Guards were raised in 1661 on the plan of the Gardes du Corps of the French, being formed chiefly of gentlemen of family and dis- tinction who themselves, or their fathers, had fought in the Civil War. In the same year the Blues were also embodied, and called the Oxford Blues, from their first commander, Aubrey, Earl of Oxford. The Coldstream Foot Guards date their formation from 1660, when two regiments were added to the one raised about ten years previously by General Monk at Coldstream, on the borders of Scotland. To these were added the ist Royal Scots, brought over from France at the Restoration ; the 2nd, or Queen's, raised in 1661 ; the 3rd, or Old Buffs, from their accoutrements being composed of buffalo leather, embodied in 1665; the Scotch Fusiliers (now the 2ist Foot), raised in 1678, and so called from their carrying the fusil, a firelock lighter than the musket, invented in France in 1630; and the 4th, or King's Own, raised in 1680. During this reign the bayonet was invented at Bayonne, whence its name. In 1678 Evelyn informs us that the Grena- diers were first brought into our service. " They were so called," he says, "because they were dexterous at flinging hand-grenades, every one having a pouch 238 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS full." The Dragoons derived their name from dragon, a fire-arm of Elizabeth's time, ornamented with the head of that fabled monster. In 1632 European cavalry was divided into four classes " the Lancier, the Cuirassier, the Arquebusier, the Carbineer, and the Dragon e." Even in those days people seem to have been hard at work inventing new equipment and weapons. Before, and up to the time of the Revolution (1688), there existed a company entitled "The Hollow Sword-blade Company," which was chartered for the professed purpose of making swords of this construction. Though it is uncertain whether these hollow sword-blades (with running mercury enclosed to gravitate to the point when a blow was struck, and so increase the weight and momentum of the stroke) were ever adopted in actual warfare ; it is certain that " The Hollow Sword-blade Company " ultimately resolved itself into a great land-purchasing company, and invested large sums in the purchase of the Irish forfeited estates, eventually sold at Chichester House, Dublin, in the years 1703-4. These were resold again to different purchasers, and I believe there are still estates in Ireland which depend on what is called " The Hollow Sword-blade Title " ; that is to say, deeds showing their repurchase from the original company." Uniform as we know it to-day is of course a compara- tively modern invention ; the mediaeval archer probably wore any clothes he could get, though commanders gave their troops a special badge. INFANTRY 239 A white cross was generally worn by the English men-at-arms in the time of the Crusades, being after- wards retained as late as the reign of Edward IV. Stowe says the City Archers wore the red cross, the arms of the City, on the back and breast of their coats. As armour became abandoned, the necessity for uniform became more apparent, and scarlet was definitely established as that of the British Army in the reign of Queen Anne, at which time, also, the pike ceased to be carried and the musket and bayonet became the general weapons of the infantry. The rose was adopted as an emblem of England in the time of the Tudors, after the cessation of the Wars of the Roses; the thistle, from the incident of a Dane treading on one, and, by his cries of pain, alarm- ing the Scottish camp, and saving the army from destruction ; the shamrock, or three-leaved grass, was by the early Irish considered an emblem of the Trinity, brought to Ireland by St. Patrick, and so became the badge of the nation. Both in Norway and in Denmark the infantry soldiers had red cloth ; the English infantry red is said by some to be copied from that once worn by Norwegian troops. The term " infantry " is said to have taken its origin from one of the Infantas of Spain, who, rinding that the army commanded by the King her father had been defeated by the Moors, assembled a body of foot-soldiers, and with them engaged and totally defeated the enemy. In memory of this event, and to honour the foot-soldiers, who were not before held 240 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS in much consideration, they received the name of " infantry." To realize the change which the British military uniform has undergone during the last two hundred and fifty years one has only to take a regiment like the Life Guards. The dashing Cavalier guardsman, as enrolled by Charles II, entered into London in 1661 with a round sombrero hat, drooping feather, long curling hair, lace collar, cuirass, gold-embroidered scarf, flaunting shoulder-knot, buff belt and bandolier ; gradually he developed into the steady, sturdy soldier of 1742, with pigtail and smartly cocked hat, long sword, and gold- laced frock. Later on came the life-guardsman of the early fifties, his tails not yet cut off or his coatee converted into a short tunic. His jack-boots, leather breeches, shining cuirass, and glittering helmet, how- ever, are with us still. The cavalier rode the old Flemish horse ; the dragoon of Malplaquet jogged sturdily along on a Suffolk Punch, the favourite steed of that day; while the life-guardsman of 1853 bestrode a black warhorse of the true Smolensko strain, strong in body, heavy in limb, but clean at the fetlock. We occasionally hear complaints as to the luxurious- ness of our officers ; in all probability, however, it never reaches anything like the pitch to which it was brought by some of the smart purchase soldiers of a long-past day. The laments of one distinguished commander when piteously appealing for various luxuries still wanting to ULTIMA RATIO REGUM 241 complete his commissariat made him the laughing-stock of Europe. Lord Cardigan, before Balaclava, lived on his yacht, nor were the minor amenities of life despised by officers of what is generally accounted to have been a more hardy and rougher age. In the Peninsula, for instance, quite a number of the younger captains and subalterns carried umbrellas expensive dressing-cases were also often taken on a campaign. As for display and luxury in dress, that, of course, was a far more prominent feature of a military career than it is to-day. An earlier age even strove to make its cannon orna- mental. Louis XIV emblazoned their breaches with his crown and cipher, while within an ornamental scroll was contained the significant words, " Ultima Ratio Regum." An even more characteristic inscription was that which Oliver Cromwell had cast upon some of his artillery : " Lord, open Thou our lips, and our mouth shall shew forth Thy praise." In old days officers' trappings and swords were often real works of art. Up to quite recent times accoutrements, as well as swords of honour, used to be presented to prominent personalities as a sort of testimonial. In 1 86 1, for instance, the Lancashire Rifle Volun- teer Corps presented a set of accoutrements to Ricciotti Garibaldi, son of General Garibaldi, the great Italian patriot. The accoutrements consisted of shoulder-belt, sword-belt, and frog-belt, with silver ornaments. 242 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Some still surviving military accoutrements are of curious origin the two pins in a lancer officer's shoulder-belt were originally worn in order to clear out the touch-hole of the flint-lock pistol. The origin of aiguillettes has given rise to much controversy ; the most generally accepted theory is that an aide-de-camp was given these trappings so that he could rest his arm in the cords while writing with a pencil suspended from another cord. Every army has, of course, got something from some other army, and as in the past some of our regiments consisted largely of foreign officers and men, it is not extraordinary that we should in some cases have copied foreign equipment. One of the first lieutenant-colonels of the 6oth Rifles, when it was the Royal American Regiment, was Henri Bouquet, a Swiss, who had served in the Dutch and Sardinian Armies. The 6oth, in its early days, had a peculiarly foreign character, composed as it was of Lowenstein Fusiliers, Waldstein's Chasseurs, and the regiment of Hompesch, the latter of whom, I believe, bestowed upon it its badge. The Rifle officers' dress, in any case, was originally merely that of a German hussar. Many regiments possess pieces of mess- plate recalling glorious incidents connected with their history. One of the most interesting of these is the centre- piece of the ist Battalion of the Buffs, the subject of which is the heroic deed of an officer, Latham by name, at Albuera, in which battle he kept his LATHAM 243 hold on the colours even when one arm had been cut off. The gallant soldier, in fact, rigidly followed the rule of conduct which used to be laid down for ensigns during the Thirty Years' War. At that period, when a colour-bearer for the first time received the regimental colour, he was ad- monished " to treat it as a bride and daughter ; if need be to take it from the right hand to the left, or if both arms were shot or cut off, to hold it in his mouth ; and when neither help nor hope remained, wrap himself in it, and after commending his soul to God, to be stabbed and die in it as befitted an honest man." Latham recovered from his wounds. He appears to have considered himself an ill-used man, for, leaving the army, he married a Frenchwoman and settled down in France to farm, I have an idea that Latham, the aviator, who died in 1912 while hunting big-game in Africa, was related to the gallant colour-bearer of Albuera. Neither the adjutant of the ist Buffs nor that kindliest of men, Lieutenant-Colonel Newnham Davis, who is an authority on such matters, could give me any definite information. One thing, however, is certain both Lathams, whether related to one another or not, were exceptionally brave men. It is pleasant indeed to learn that a singularly appropriate monument is about to be erected at Sangatte to the memory of Hubert Latham. The gallant aviator who was the first who attempted to 244 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS fly across the Channel will be represented standing on a rock, a cigarette between his fingers. At the foot of a column nearly 40 feet high there will be a figure representing Aviation, pointing with outstretched hand towards the English coast. A number of picturesque and stately ceremonies formerly inaugurated a military career. One of these, " the blessing of the swords," still prevails at Wiener Neustadt in Austria. During a recent review held at the Military Academy to celebrate the eighty-third anniversary of the Emperor Francis Joseph's birth, a number of young officers took a solemn oath of fealty over their drawn swords held out towards a chaplain, after whom they repeated " Faithful unto Death." All this is akin to the spirit which animated the brave Charles XII of Sweden. When for the first time that monarch was under fire, he inquired what the hissing he heard about his ears was, and being told that it was caused by the musket-balls, "Good!" he exclaimed; "this henceforth shall be my music." Much of our military ceremonial came from the Continent. In all probability that picturesque sur- vival, the presentation at Windsor Castle of the Waterloo banner, by which Strathfieldsaye is held by the family of the first Duke of Wellington, is of foreign origin. A banner similar to that carried by Napoleon's army is suspended over the bust of the illustrious Duke in the Guard Chamber, opposite to that of the Duke of Marlborough, where it remains until replaced by its successor. THE POMP OF THE PAST 245 A similar ceremony is observed in connexion with the tenure of Blenheim, the banner bearing, however, the lilies of France, in reference to the army van- quished by Marlborough. In both cases a new banner is presented every year. At present a general idea prevails that all this sort of thing is merely archaic folly. The spirit of the age is indeed rather inclined to laugh at all military display as childish folly. In England I think this has been largely brought about by officers never wearing their uniform off duty. The eighteenth-century English officer was proud of his scarlet coat, and did not rush to doff it when he had gone off duty. Previous to the latter forties of the last century officers appear to have worn a uniform blue frock- coat even in everyday life. They had then, however, ceased to wear their swords, which even many years before they had come to regard as an inconvenience in private life. The Duke of Wellington is supposed to have discouraged officers wearing their regimentals, as the term then was, his idea being that the sight of too many red or blue coats would arouse feeling against the Army, which was already not too popular with a large section of the population. The world has always associated a soldier with pomp and show, and the old school of colonels attached great importance to their officers and men being the pink of smartness both in and out of uniform. 246 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Not a few commanders were veritable martinets with regard to even quite trifling matters of equip- ment ; a sash tied wrong or a button out of place was capable of throwing them into almost a frenzy. The health of the soldier was even sometimes sacrificed to the exigencies of show and smartness ; for instance, the old-fashioned high stock must have been most uncomfortable to wear. Up to the middle of the fifties of the last century, for instance, the Guards wore white trousers in summer, the effect of which must have well con- trasted with the scarlet of their coats. At the time of the remodelling of British uniforms after the Crimean War, the present dark-coloured trousers were adopted for wear all through the year. One of the chief reasons for the change, I have been told, was the contention that the trousers needed constant washing, and in consequence the men often put them on wet, with the result that rheumatism and chills were very prevalent throughout the brigade. What a change from the present state of affairs, when all sorts of hygienic safeguards are enforced in the Army, and all vestiges of the old " pipeclay " system are discouraged ! It is a relief to turn from the inartistic and often childish vagaries of those responsible for military uniforms to the sensible system which regulates the costume of our Navy. Beyond some slight altera- tions, a naval officer's dress has not been seriously altered for some sixty years. NAVAL UNIFORM 247 Regular uniform for seamen would appear to have only been introduced into the Navy in 1857, although for many years previously captains used to dress the crews of their principal boats either in a fanciful way or in a style appropriate to the name of the ship they commanded. Admiral Dundas, for instance, rigged his men out in the Dundas tartan, and a certain captain of the Tiger had jerseys with yellow and black stripes served out to the crew of his boat. The familiar term "blazer" takes its origin from this old naval custom, the captain of H.M.S. Blazer in 1845 having equipped his ship's company in blue and white striped guernseys, which originated the expression now in general use. Some captains carried eccentricity to great lengths. The gig's crew of the Harlequin in 1853 were dressed as harlequins, and about the same time the captain of the Constance rigged out his own boatmen in dungaree suits with red sashes and long sheath-knives in their belts. This costume however, the Com- mander-in-Chief at Rio declined to sanction. Irregularity in naval uniform continued to prevail for some time after the issue of the official circular of January 30, 1857, but for many years now the prescribed pattern has been strictly followed. Never- theless as late as the early seventies ships' bands were dressed according to the taste and fancy of captains and officers. IX FADS IT is no exaggeration to say that this is the golden age of the fad. Never before in the world's history has this particular form of egotism had such chances of flourishing as it has to-day. In rougher and more matter-of-fact times our ancestors did not give it much chance of developing, but to-day even the most insensate little fad has a good chance of reaching honourable maturity. When a fad grows up it becomes what the Press calls a "movement," has its own society, its secretary, and sometimes its own little balance-sheet. In accordance with the demand for them fads naturally multiply ; at the present day their name is legion. Besides the great, big, flourishing, and financially prosperous fads, based upon some real foundation of truth, like Woman's Suffrage, Temper- ance, Cruelty to Animals, and other varieties of social reform, there are quantities of lesser fads which do very well indeed. Such are Anti-vivisection, Anti-sport, Anti- gambling, the craze for licensing and controlling 348 "PROGRESSIVE" FADS 249 everything and everybody, and numberless others based upon an imaginary right to make people vir- tuous by Act of Parliament. A rather old-fashioned fad of this sort is the one which seeks to make the Sabbath a day of complete dullness and gloom, the whole of it to be spent either in church, contemplation, or sleep. Some formerly carried this fad so far that they disliked papers being opened or read in their house on Sunday. The anti-corporal punishment fanatics are another group. I wonder what they have to say to the recent report of the Governor of Delaware, a State which still retains the old-fashioned whipping- posts ? These relics of a brutal age, far from exercising a demoralizing influence, according to the report in question, reduce crime to a minimum, there being a great fear of the public disgrace attached to a sentence of public castigation. The London County Council has had many expen- sive fads ; happily most of these have now been squashed. Quite recently a little-known fad of theirs, " the Farmfield Colony for Drunkards," has been closed. This interesting social experiment in an existence of ten years cost the ratepayers ; 100,000, without, of course, materially affecting drunkenness. Only 19 per cent of the six hundred cases dealt with proved amenable to treatment whatever that may mean the percentage of cures being considerably lower. 250 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Wholesale faddism may be said to be the peculiar appanage of the so-called Progressives, who seem ready to take up all sorts of wild schemes. No one has ever spent so much money upon fads as they ; witness the London steamboats, which, costing an enormous sum, had, owing to lack of passengers, to be sold for a song. The fads of the past were purely insular, but pre- sently we shall be confronted with the international fad. The substantial, if inartistic, result of this particular craze is the Palace of Peace at the Hague, the building of which, by the way, was immediately followed by the especially sanguinary Russo-Japanese War. This dream of perpetual peace among the nations, however, is no new thing. When it first became known to the world that very important improvements had been made in cannon and fire-arms, while leading military authorities were of opinion that the art of war would undergo an entire change, altruists and peacemakers went so far as to hope that war would become impossible, as certain death awaited all combatants. This is the halcyon age of legislative Paul Prys, who stick at nothing in their advocacy of various fads. Many of these people, while perfectly sincere, live in the impulse of the moment, and if facts constitute an obstruction either declare that they are no longer facts or ignore them altogether. Their own ideas for the most part are based upon half fact and half fiction ; so many a good man or woman fights a life- EXPERIMENTAL FADDISTS 251 long battle, the result of which must, of necessity, be hopeless. Such people, however self-sacrificing and well- meaning they may be, are as a rule quite incapable of taking a sane view of the questions with which they deal. Imbued with an uncritical spirit of enthusiasm for righting wrongs and moralizing all the world, they entirely disregard or disguise the experience of past ages. No disorders have employed so many quacks as those that have no cure, and no sciences have exercised so many pens as those that have no certainty. Trying social experiments upon the less fortunate classes (for the very wealthy are little affected by grandmotherly legislation) has now almost reached the pitch of having become one of our national sports. Thousands of people belong to some society or other for the reform of somebody or something, thereby, of course, indirectly supporting a secretary and his family, perhaps about the only satisfactory result of the whole thing. Quacks with legislative cures for every kind of social evil are now as plentiful as Jews on the Stock Exchange. One consolation is that, owing to our super- abundant reformers, we shall soon have so many meddlesome laws and regulations that the lot of them will fall into abeyance. A study of the Bills annually brought forward in 252 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS the House of Commons is an excellent demonstration of the pitch to which faddism can be carried. Happily for England, most of the more outrageous Bills promoted by private members are never allowed to come to maturity. A large number always deal with the repression of forms of sport odious to sentimentalists. The earliest legislation for the protection of animals of the brute creation was one of the most salutary and just legislative innovations ever brought forward. All credit to Lord Erskine and Richard Martin for having been the foremost in the England of the past to im- prove the lot of the brute creation. The legislative proposals of many modern animal lovers, however, go much too far ; some, indeed, seem to set a higher value on the life of a brute than on that of a man. Said one of these to me : "If I saw any one ill- treating a horse, I should consider myself perfectly justified in killing him." Ill-balanced fanaticism can go no further than this. Of Bills dealing with so-called temperance, there is, of course, no end. Private members' Bills drafted with the intention of making people moral by Act of Parliament also abound. Mr. Josiah King is a great promoter of this sort of legislation, which, for some curious reason, generally has the support of the Labour party the English proletariat, which it claims to represent, cannot justly be called hypo- critical or canting. Of late years a tendency towards this particularly AN EMOTIONAL FOX-HUNTER 253 futile and rather nauseous form of faddism has also made its appearance in the House of Lords. Oddly enough, about its warmest supporter there seems to be that genial, if somewhat emotional, fox-hunter, Lord Willoughby de Broke, who was carried away by the hysterical movement which manufactured the outcry as to the really non-existent English " White Slave Trade." This, after all, is merely a new name for an evil of immemorial antiquity. Like the " Cobra Corrugata of the Yangtze-kiang," for a view of which the old showman refused to take the Iron Duke's shilling : " It's only the Old Sarpint with a new coat of paint." The lamentable thing is that social reformers who deal with this evil will never trouble to inves- tigate the unfortunate results which have invariably followed upon every attempt at compulsory moral- ization. The measures they advocate are too drastic, their promoters frequently carrying an extreme desire to stamp out vice beyond reasonable bounds. Many who should be diverting their energies into more useful channels, become like that holy Pontiff, Pius V, who is stated by a chronicler to have been so occu- pied in re-establishing and improving "his admirable Inquisition," that the concerns of the people went to ruin. The real truth as to the White Slave agitation was admirably exposed by Mrs. Billington Greig in the June number of the English Review. It is highly regrettable that Lord Willoughby de Broke, 254 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Mr. Arthur Lee, and others instead of being gulled by the sensational statements which Mrs. Greig has so ably proved to be mere hysterical fabrications, do not devote their energies to a real evil and attempt to deal with the terrible hidden scourge which constitutes a real danger to the national health. Untold human suffering might be alleviated if serious attention were paid to the de- mands of those who appeal for a Royal Commission to investigate the facts concerning these diseases. This appeared in the Morning Post of July 22, 1913, signed by the President of the Royal College of Physicians and the leaders of the medical pro- fession. To their eternal shame, with scarcely an exception, our politicians and so-called reformers, fearing un- popularity, dare not allude to what is, undoubtedly, a national disgrace. To the honour of the British Press, a certain more enlightened section of it has of late done its best to arouse public opinion as to the penalty which England pays for its wilful blindness. Up to quite recently, any one who attempted to call public attention to the present terrible state of affairs in print was vilified and given to understand he had much better leave the subject alone. I ought to know when some years ago I wrote a special chapter in " Piccadilly to Pall Mall," dealing with what has now come to be regarded as a real and grave scandal, most (but not all) social reformers received it with scornful abuse. GOOD FADS 255 Well might the great Goethe say that, "If any one advances anything new which contradicts, per- haps threatens to overturn, the creed which we have for years repeated and have handed down to others, all passions are raised against him, and every effort is made to crush him ! " A fad well worthy of respect demands prison reform and giving people who have been in prison a fresh start in life. The spirit of this agitation is akin to that which caused the relaxation of the old criminal law which besides being terribly severe upon malefactors, dealt much too ferociously with any one who, even with good reason, troubled the public peace. A favourite remedy for social disaffection was then not to remove its causes, but to imprison, transport, and hang without mercy. While Lord Sidmouth held the post of Home Secretary fourteen rioters were hanged at York in 1813, eight more at Leicester in 1817, three more at Nottingham in the same year, and five more at Ely in 1819. As for ordinary crime, any tampering with pro- perty was punished in quite savage fashion and many people were executed for theft. On one occasion, it is said, a jury, under the judge's direction, brought a woman in guilty of man- slaughter for stealing a pair of breeches ; the real fact was that they were all determined to save her from the halter, and it was just as well to do it in this manner as any other. Those were rough days, and curious scenes took 256 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS place in courts of justice, as the following speech by a judge to a jury well shows : " Gentlemen of the jury, in this case the counsel on both sides are unintelligible, the witnesses incredible, and the plaintiffs and defendants are both such bad characters that to me it is indifferent which way you give your verdict." Brevity, satire, and point were here admirably displayed. Another brief, witty summing-up was that of a judge who was trying a boy for having stolen a pudding. " Gentlemen," said he, pointing to the prisoner, " there's the boy and there's the pudding ! " A bad fad is the one which seeks to make heroes out of criminals, demands the abolition of capital punishment, and a too lenient treatment of crime. Some years ago there was a fad which sought the reduction of sentences, but I believe the conse- quences were so disappointing that it died away. Still, the judges of to-day are more lenient than those of the past. About the last representative of the stern old school, who was a real terror to evil-doers, was the late Lord Brampton, a judge who dispensed justice with a stern hand and was entirely free from judicial sentimentalism. Carrying out the idea that criminals should be severely punished in order to check crime, he took no account of chatter about environment, well-meaning ideas, and chimerical fancies, which, in the end, seemed to him to lead towards social anarchy. There is no doubt that his methods were to a great extent justified by FRESH AIR 257 results : the most extraordinary thing about them was that they apparently pleased the criminal classes themselves, with whom " Old Hawkins," as they familiarly spoke of him, enjoyed great popularity. Lord Brampton, it must, however, be remembered, was essentially a very just judge. It is a pity that so few men of his stamp are alive to-day to combat the tendency towards ridiculous leniency. The hysterical faddists who make a criminal more interesting than his victims are merely hindering the execution of justice, and giving the criminal class to understand that the proceedings of the judicial bench and the condemnation of a jury are a solemn farce. It is inconceivable that importance should be attached to the protests of persons moved by maudlin sentimentality or pious hypocrisy. Among minor social fads there are several which, properly controlled, have a positively beneficent effect. Such are Fresh air, exercise, and vege- tarianism the two last, within certain limits, good ; the first, excellent at all times and for all people. Unfortunately, owing to antique prejudice, the beneficial effects of keeping windows open is not realized by most of the population. Go down any street in London and you will find the majority of windows shut. A large number, indeed, are very fond of the opposition fad of, under all circumstances, keeping windows shut. Curiously enough, if these lovers of stuffiness fail to notice that a window is open they are perfectly content, but let a sash creak 258 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS and they immediately indulge in peculiar pantomimic movements expressive of disgust. While the fad for fresh air can, no doubt, be carried too far, it should be remembered that "just as a fish cannot flourish in dirty water, so man cannot flourish in foul air." The most convincing proof, however, of the relation between a free current of air and health is the remarkable and well-authenticated fact that in warfare the wounded placed in tents always get well far more quickly than those tended within four walls. The proportion of recoveries amongst those who have been nursed in tents is also far greater. The purely modern fad for exercise, while bene- ficial to some, makes no difference and is positively hurtful to others, mainly for the reason that they do not know when to stop. Hard exercise in the case of a man over forty is more or less contrary to nature ; no animal which has reached full maturity goes tearing about merely for the love of the thing. A charming friend of mine, poor fellow! un- doubtedly owed his death to exercise. For some reason or other, although as thin as a lath, he made it a practice to run round the Park every morning before breakfast. As he got older and thinner some of his friends begged him to desist. Nothing, however, could make him listen to their remonstrances, and so at the comparatively early age of forty-eight, he was one morning found in a state of collapse on his doorstep, from which he was never to start again. VEGETARIANISM 259 Vegetarianism, when carried to excess, is liable to upset certain constitutions, but as a check upon the modern habit of eating enormous quantities of meat it has its uses. Devotees of this particular fad seem, for the most part, to be people of a gentle, refined, and often clever disposition, and there is no doubt that a number of them are better without meat, for which they have an instinctive dislike. On the other hand, when it is taken up with immoderate enthusiasm by any one who has been accustomed to a generous and unrestricted diet, it is liable to produce weakness and depression, causing uneasiness to relatives. In such cases tactful measures are the best. Lunching with a friend fond of food fads, I observed that he touched no meat, but ate only certain strange vegetarian dishes, which had evi- dently been prepared for his special consumption. Later on, I inquired of his wife if this new diet agreed with her husband. "It didn't at first," she replied, "but it does now." " From his looks he certainly seems to thrive on it. He never looked more robust in his life." " I take care of that," she went on, " though I hope he won't find it out. No man partakes of a more carnivorous diet than he. Every one of those vegetable courses you saw to-day was full of the strongest meat juice which, by my orders, is put into everything served to him before it appears on the table." 260 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS This pious fraud, I understand, still continues, with evident benefit to my friend's health. Conscientious scruples as to the killing of animals causes a certain number of people to be vegetarians. I have known some, indeed, who, owing to ex- aggerated considerations of this kind, would not wear boots made of leather ! This idea of not destroying life is of course very much akin to the spirit of Buddhism, which now has a certain number of followers in England. There is, indeed, one Buddhist peer, a cousin of mine, who some years ago adopted the religion in question. The tenets of Buddhism in its highest and purest state are very fine. The ordinary idea that the ultimate aim of the Buddhist is to attain peace by means of annihilation is scarcely fair. The grand finale the ultimate consummation set before the minds of Buddha's worshippers is deification, apotheosis, absorption of the soul into God, but not its annihilation. When they plead that man's soul should seek its last consummate perfection in deification, in union and communion with the In- finite Deity from whom it sprang, they state that, in order to do so, it must " get rid of self and selfishness, or its separate conditions and interests " ; but not that it must get rid of its essence of being, which is to be glorified and expanded by union with Deity, and by no means to be reduced to nothing. The Buddhists continually compare the human soul to a drop of water, severed from the great ocean of BUDDHISM 261 Deity by a transitory individuality of selfism ; and they believe that this drop must regain its original state by mingling once more with the essential Fountain of existence from which it issued. They allow, indeed, that this drop may pass through many changes, metamorphoses, and revolutions before it recovers its original union with God ; but they do not acknowledge that it can ever utterly perish, though some of their metaphysical phrases on this topic are extremely subtle and ambiguous, and often misunderstood. True Buddhism is a lofty, noble, and altruistic creed which cannot be classed with the fad religions, mostly manufactured in America, which during the last fifty years have attracted so many. No matter how absurd may be its tenets, a brand- new religion (as a rule, cooked up from some old one) is sure to have a certain amount of success. Man has need of something wonderful, Napoleon is reported to have told O'Meara, and it is this need which causes many who are indifferent to religion to consult those claiming to possess occult powers and follow the charlatans who start new creeds. They would not have had much success with some of the stolid old school of Churchmen. One of this type once said to me, " Never bother yourself about disquieting speculations ; they only lead to doubt and unhappiness ! Go to church regularly on Sunday, and leave the rest to the parson, whose business it is to think out these things. I go to the best bootmaker in London 262 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS for my boots, to the best tailor for my clothes, and the best gunmaker for my guns, and I don't bother them as to the details of their work, provided it is properly done. I have been brought up in the Church of England and, therefore, am naturally perfectly satisfied to follow the man who knows most about it you may be sure the Archbishop of Canter- bury wouldn't be paid the salary he gets if he wasn't an expert about the whole thing." Crude as it is, such an attitude is undoubtedly more healthy than being carried away by one of the numerous forms of fad religion which, for some curious reason, attract a large number of people. There is at all events dignity about the old-established faiths ; about the new, none. The ritual of the latter is merely a hotchpotch of scraps, picked out of more dignified forms of worship. It is, indeed, for the most part but a very cheap form of spiritual patent medicine, the prescription for which has been prepared by an unlicensed and sometimes designing quack. In this age of fads it might be worth while for some crank to revive a curious form of religion which some fifty years ago was started by a Dr. Edward Lowenthal. This sect, which was called the " Cogi- tants," had as their motto: "Our knowledge is our faith ; our dignity is our morality ; our worship is life ; and our religion is our secret." A few of their doctrines and practices were as follows : Neither theft nor fraud could be punished with imprisonment. Women were to have a part in the Church govern- MATERIALISM 263 ment. Only the lower part of a coffin should be buried in the earth. All good Cogitants (the head of whom was to wear a black camlet cloak with upright collar and three silver stars on it) were to have a good dinner for nothing, and dine in public on Christmas Day, Easter Sunday, and Whit Sunday. Materialism, as a fad, seems now rather out of fashion, but it had a considerable vogue in the seven- ties after Darwin had published his "Origin of Species." It does not seem to be so active now, perhaps owing to the harmony between religion and science inter- mittently discovered by the English Press. Materialism is the concomitant of religious apathy rather than its cause. There is no doubt, I think, that the apathy in question is largely produced by the tendency of the Church to attach more importance to dogma and ceremonial forms than is in consonance with the age or with the spirit of the Protestant Church, which, after all, should be widely progressive and not a mere copy of Roman Catholicism. The High Church clergy are no doubt very devoted and sincere, but in spite of their self-sacrifice and fervour they have unconsciously shaken the founda- tions of the Church of England. Numbers of people, in disgust at the slavish copying of Roman Catholic ceremonial, cease to go to church at all. In particular, the labouring classes in country districts, as is well known, prefer the simpler and more austere worship of Nonconformist chapels. Numbers of others, becoming accustomed to ornate worship, finally determine to go the whole hog and 264 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS betake themselves to Rome. Not so very long ago almost all the congregation of a High Church in Brighton embraced Catholicism, and quite recently a brotherhood of so-called Church of England monks in Essex did the same. The progress which Roman Catholicism has made among well-to-do people of late years is a highly significant social symptom. This going over to Rome, however, is essentially a Society fad. Among the masses the Roman Church draws comparatively few recruits, and they still retain a good deal of that prejudice which was so actively displayed in the Gordon Riots. Even in Mid- Victorian days Anti- Romanism was a common and rather powerful fad. The announcement in 1859, for instance, that the then Prince of Wales, the late King, was to reside in Rome a few months gave rise to not a little feeling in English religious circles, a portion of which frankly declared that he would be injured by what he saw and heard in the Eternal City. A more tolerant section was of opinion that the Romanism which he would witness might provoke his antagonism and strengthen his faith. Those who were most alarmed at Roman Catholic ceremonial showed the greatest feeling on this subject ; those who were not so much alarmed said that the young Prince had received a Protestant education which would effectually preserve him from being tempted. The fanaticism and intolerance aroused by the controversies which followed on the Reformation, itself perhaps a sort of superior kind of fad, had not HARMLESS FADS 265 then totally subsided to-day most people seem to have forgotten what was undoubtedly one of the most striking events in the history of the human mind. Every pen was engaged in the dispute, and the faddists of that day had plenty to employ their energies. Protestants, alternately with Catholics, used the stage and drama as instruments of contro- versy, each party, of course, complaining of their licentiousness. The Protestant Liturgy, restored at the accession of Elizabeth after its suppression under Mary, was attacked by innumerable .ballads and interludes. The opposite party had their poets, and every day produced some popular ballad for or against the Reformation. "The stage," observed Dr. Percy, " in those days literally was, what wise men had always wished it to be a supplement to the pulpit. Chapter and verse were as formally quoted as in a sermon." On the other side, " the new Gospellers" were ridiculed by the Catholics, and found support in the elder part of their audience, who still clung to their old doctrines, the young adopting the Reforma- tion in its fullest sense. The conduct of the Catholics called down a proclamation from Edward VI (1549), wherein we find that the Government was most anxious that these plays should be performed in " the English tongue " ; nothing was said about Latin, because probably few could be affected by treasonable utterances in that language. There are many quite harmless minor fads which have an amusing side. Such a one is the " phonetic spelling fad " ; many words spelt in the new fashion, 266 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS which it seeks to make general, are often irresistibly comic. Phonetic spelling, of course, is quite an old- fashioned thing. In the eighteenth century, accurate spelling was a rare accomplishment, and especially amongst fashion- able ladies. Playing at the old parlour-game of " I love my love with a letter," three ladies Ladies Cheere, Fielding, and Hill are supposed to have answered as follows : "I love," began the first, "my love with an N, because he is a night ; " Lady Fielding followed with, " I love my love with a G, because he is a gustice ; " "and I love my love with an F," said Lady Hill, " because he is a fisishun." No modern devotee of phonetic spelling could do better. While what may be termed public fads that is, fads which seek to interfere with the lives or doings of other people have enormously increased in number, the purely private fad of personal eccentricity is not nearly so common as in the past. About the most curious fad of this kind was the craze which wealthy old gentlemen used to have for keeping an enormous balance at their bankers'. " I want to borrow ^40,00x3," said an old peer, strolling into Coutts's one day. " Rather a large sum, your lordship. May I venture to inquire why you need it?" said the partner into whose private room the nobleman had been shown. " That's my business," was the reply. 11 Of course, your lordship can have the money ; A SUFFICIENT BALANCE 267 I only asked because I thought you might have forgotten that your balance here is ,30,000 ! " " And always will be ! " snapped out the old peer, as he brusquely got up and left the room. The truth of the matter was that, certain inevitable expenses threatening to reduce the balance in question, he determined to take measures to keep an even larger sum at his immediate command. Another similar mania was a craze for keeping great sums in private houses, often not even under lock and key. A relative of the present writer, who died in the forties of the last century, for instance, had a love for putting bank-notes in books, and a sum amounting to little short of ,30,000 was extracted from between the leaves of his library by his executors. This passion for ready cash sometimes amounted to something like a mania. A former Lord Dysart, who lived more or less an invalid's life in a house on the outskirts of London, carefully watched over by a lady who acted as a sort of companion-nurse, one day asked her to go to town and get a cheque cashed for him at the Bank of England. When she was ready to start, the old peer sat down at his writing-table, and, having written out a cheque for ; 100,000, told her to be sure and see that she got one note for the whole amount. The nurse, as may be imagined, was somewhat staggered at the largeness of the sum ; but, having in due course of time arrived at the Bank, presented the cheque for payment, with the request that the drawer particularly wanted a single note for it. 268 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS The cashier communicated with the manager, who asked the nurse to step into his private office. Having satisfied himself as to her authority for making such a request, he said that if she did not object he would much rather send a clerk to accompany her with the note. She gladly assented to this arrangement, and in due course the clerk in person handed the ; 100,000 note to Lord Dysart. After having done so, he told the peer that only three such notes were in existence. "One," said he, " we have at the bank, another I have just handed to your lordship, and the third, which some time ago disappeared from circulation, we have never been able to trace." " Perhaps I can help you," said Lord Dysart, and, hobbling over to a bureau, he unlocked a drawer and took out the missing ; 100,000 note, which had been lying there for many years. The craze for having an unlimited sum of ready money at immediate command, no matter at what cost, occasionally affects the young as well as the old. According to one account, taking advantage of this idiosyncrasy laid the foundations of the late Sam Lewis's fortune. In the earlier portion of this great moneylender's career, when he was making a livelihood by selling jewellery on commission at Brighton, he came across a rich young subaltern, who, in addition to being fond of purchasing costly trinkets, possessed a regular craze for ready money. SAM LEWIS 269 This young officer was the very incarnation of laziness, and could not bear the trouble of going into his affairs drawing cheques even when money was at the bank to meet them was almost too great a tax upon his energies. He was, however, quite prepared to pay handsome interest for money which could be obtained without bother. Sam, with that shrewdness which was his character- istic, quietly made exhaustive inquiries into the young soldier's affairs, and finding that the latter possessed ample assets if he chose to realize them, advanced the simpleton whatever he wanted at a very remunera- tive rate, with the result that the investment (it could hardly be called a speculation) proved highly profit- able in the end. While the nucleus of Sam's large fortune was, of course, made by moneylending, a very con- siderable portion was the result of successful flutters in the City, where Sam was very fortunate. He, too, had one dominating fad gambling. At cards and on the turf he lost many thousands ; nevertheless in an indirect way his passion for high play rather paid him, for it undoubtedly acted as a big advertisement and brought him prominently into notice. At Monte Carlo, where he was a well-known figure, his sensational way of playing in maximums always caused him to be surrounded by an admiring and envious crowd. His craze for card-playing once cost him many thousands. At a club on the Riviera, organized, it was said, especially for Sam's benefit, he lost one 270 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS night many thousands at baccarat. Though he was afterwards informed that it was highly probable he had been robbed, he characteristically declined to investigate the matter. " Anyhow," said he, "I lost the money and I'm going to pay." As his will showed, he had a somewhat superior mind. He would, indeed, have probably succeeded in any line he had chosen to adopt. " I don't understand, Sam," once said an old client of his to him, " why you don't retire and go in for politics or something. With your money and brains you would be sure to get on." " My boy," was the reply, " it would be hopeless for me to try a new line. Everybody knows what I am; even if I became Archbishop of Canterbury, I should be Sam Lewis the moneylender still." Although in his latter years he had virtually retired from business, only negotiating very large loans on good security, the genial little moneylender had become a regular West End institution. His death resulting from a chill caught looking at Queen Victoria's funeral procession gave many a great shock. " Good gracious me ! " said a well-known man about town on hearing the sad news; "here's the poor old Queen gone at one end of the week and Sam Lewis at the other! Whatever's going to happen next?" In his own particular line Sam was a master of diplomacy and tact. A proof of this was that his name very rarely figured in cases of bankruptcy or MONEYLENDERS 271 the like, nor was he ever heard of as suing any one for small sums. His knowledge of men about town was so accurate that he very seldom made a mistake. A would-be borrower whom he did not wish to offend he would often get rid of by lending him a small sum at no interest at all ; others he would contrive to foist off on to some humbler member of the moneylending tribe. " I don't feel like doing business to-day, my boy," Sam would say; "but why don't you give a turn? His place is only a stone's-throw from here, and I'm sure you'll find him reasonable." Sam, of course, was head and shoulders above all the moneylenders of his day. There is an aristocracy among usurers as in other professions. The old-fashioned Shylock, who used to try and get his unfortunate clients to take part of a loan in bad sherry or indifferent cigars, might justly have been placed at the bottom of the scale. I remember such a one an obese Hebrew who tried to dazzle youthful clients by flashing about a sham gold cigar-case, ornamented with a huge mono- gram of bogus stones. He was also in the habit of telling them that though he never ate anything, he kept an expensive French cook. Why he should have thought this detail of his domestic life likely to impress would-be borrowers was an insoluble mystery. This kind of usurer often used to indulge in specious advertisements, which no doubt originated the circulars which modern moneylenders, or more often their touts, shower broadcast to-day. 272 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS A new fad, championed by Lord Newton, now seeks to make the sending of these circulars an offence. It is regrettable that this clever peer, who is justly regarded as a most valuable asset of the Unionist party, should have fallen a victim to the modern craze for unnecessary legislation. Curbing the rapacity of moneylenders on the old mediaeval principle of occasionally drawing a Shylock's teeth is no doubt a very salutary thing, but attempting to suppress what, after all, is merely a nuisance by legislation is surely going too far. Only a few years ago a rather sensible Bill dealing with moneylending became law, but, though a good deal was expected from it, I fancy it had little effect. This, of course, was before Lord Newton had . begun to direct his energies towards safeguarding the pockets of the public from the unscrupulous in- roads of the bookmaker and the usurer. One of his pet theories seems to be that, if people are not exposed to temptation by advertisement or circular, they will neither bet nor borrow money. Ever alert for evidence as to the widespread harm done by these two evils, what must have been the excitement when some poor imbecile usurer sent a circular to the reforming peer's own daughter ! Such a shameless piece of effrontery naturally called for drastic measures, and her father at once drafted a Bill to smite Shylock hip and thigh. Of one thing he may be sure whether his Bill eventually passes or not, it will have little or no effect. If he will study the history of European laws against CENT PER CENT 273 moneylending, he will discover that the only result of attempts at drastic repression of moneylending is an increase in the rate of interest demanded from borrowers. Legislation has always proved completely im- potent in preventing impecunious or foolish people from being entangled in the tentacles of the octopus of cent per cent, which, in the nature of things, is after all but a necessary monster. I say necessary, because, in spite of the denuncia- tions of Lord Newton and of bankers (themselves merely a privileged class of moneylender), the usurer is an unavoidable product of civilization. Lord Newton, no doubt, having plenty of money does not see this, but there are many who, at times, find it absolutely essential to negotiate a loan, even upon what may appear to be ruinous terms. A delay of twenty-four hours in paying a large sum may mean the social ruin of an individual, and under such circumstances small wonder that he should be only too pleased to pay a heavy rate of interest for an immediate loan. Moneylenders are abused for charging a heavy percentage 25, 40, 60, even 100 per cent for lending their money. Is there any tradesman, I should like to know, who does not expect to make just as high a profit on his goods? If I go into a West End shop and buy a gold cigar-case, the seller will certainly not make less than 30 per cent out of the sale ; why should 274 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS money the most precious of all commodities be sold at a smaller rate of profit than anything else ? The agitation against moneylenders has been over- done. Their profession exists because of the weak- ness and fallibility of human nature, and nothing will seriously affect it. An even more futile and meddlesome fad of Lord Newton's in his Anti-Betting Bill. He does not, of course, call it by that name, nevertheless it best indicates what it is expected to effect. The Betting Inducements Bill, as its official title runs, did not receive the support of any prominent patrons of the Turf in the House of Lords ; they all (with the exception of Lord Durham, who was absent) voted for Lord Derby's amendment. Nor does there appear to be any particular enthu- siasm for it in the House of Commons. Mr. James Hogge, M.P. for East Edinburgh, and the most fanatical of anti-gambling faddists, is of course its warm supporter ; on the other hand, a few very advanced Radicals, much to their credit, are going to fight it tooth and nail. The ostensible object of this latest specimen of faddist legislation is to prevent the " writing, printing, and publishing or circulating in the United Kingdom of any advertisements of any betting or tipster's business," nevertheless, as in reality it is merely an attempt to prohibit betting amongst the poor, the best name for it would be " A Bill for the Restriction of Betting to the Wealthy Classes." What is the Stock Exchange but a huge gaming- A NOBLE FADDIST 275 house? Indeed, what in any society or in any place is the pursuit of money, unaccompanied by industry, but trading on chances, sheer gambling ? Lord Newton, in short, is content to allow the rich to speculate and gamble to their hearts' content, and avowedly limits his restrictive efforts to the poor, whom, like many other people with plenty of time on their hands, he thinks capital subjects for his experi- mental legislation. I am informed by several members that numbers of their working-class constituents are bitterly opposed to Lord Newton's Bill, which has also been severely criticized by the sporting Press. His lordship, however, apparently ignoring the meaning of the words " individual liberty," seems genuinely unable to understand why any one should be opposed to his proposals. In the course of a speech he made when opening a new Savings Bank at Stockport in August, he deplored the unfashionable- ness of thrift, which Parliament did not encourage. In the past Session (he added) he himself had been an unsuccessful worker in the cause of thrift, but his betting and moneylenders Bills, which were intended to protect the ignorant and the credulous, had caused him to be described as a "most abandoned person" and as a "socialist." Though one cannot approve of the former at least of these two terms being applied to the speaker, it is pleasant to learn that Lord Newton is being made to realize how deeply many Englishmen resent his attempted destruction of personal liberty by legislation. 276 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS The attitude of the Nonconformist conscience towards betting is, with all its narrowness and limita- tions, after all, perfectly logical. The same cannot be said of this new form of Unionist faddism. How, for instance, can Lord Newton, who holds such strong views as to the evils produced by betting, justify his position in remaining in a party which runs Mr. Robert Sievier a perfectly frank and self-confessed gambler as official candidate for Hoxton ? One thing I think we may be sure of, and that is, that the proprietor of the Winning Post, who is certainly not a humbug, should he get into the House of Commons, will stanchly oppose all futile and meddlesome inter- ference with the liberties of the people. Be this as it may, one thing is certain : Lord Newton may frame any Bill he likes, but he will never check betting or gambling. Further, if he and his fellow-spoilsports continue to indulge in making unnecessary laws, an inevitable reaction against being made virtuous by Act of Parliament is sure to follow. Human nature is too strong to be dragooned into virtue, and, let faddists do what they may, the people will eventually resent the dreariness of a world trans- formed into a reformatory by educational philanthropists or into a paradise designed by prigs. DEMOCRACY YEAR by year the struggle for existence grows keener, the population greater, and life more strenuous. There is undoubtedly more com- fort and luxury, but there is also more social unrest. On the other hand, that general indifference to the wellbeing and habits of the community at large which characterized our ancestors has been succeeded by an almost frenzied desire to improve the conditions under which the people live. We have got rid of town burial-grounds, multiplied windows, analysed poisonous victuals, poured down the ears of the multitude streams of knowledge about drains, sewers, fresh air, and good water, and generally attempted to teach the masses to live in accordance with the laws by which men's bodies are governed. If good drainage, sanitary reform, and laws for the regulation of everything and everybody could make humanity happy, the inhabitants of our great cities ought to be the happiest people in the world. There is, however, a dark side to the picture. To begin with, what can be more pitiable than the condi- tion of the "genteel poor," who have to sacrifice so 278 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS much for the sake of keeping up appearances ? The terrible strain of making both ends meet on a small fixed salary kills the soul of many a poor clerk or office underling with a wife and children to support. The lot of such a man is, in some respects, worse than that of the factory operative, for, with the excep- tion of a brief holiday, he passes his life in the dull drab work of making money for others to spend. There is no variety or excitement except domestic worries in his existence ; one morning is like another, and every evening he reaches home so tired both mentally and bodily that he cannot be expected to take interest in the affairs of the community at large. The result is a class, the majority of whom are practically indifferent to social, political, or religious questions ; utterly tired out by having to remain in a groove, sleep is probably the only real relaxation they enjoy. Hope is crushed out of them with the progress of years ; indeed, the only thing the older ones have to look forward to is the time when they can go to sleep for ever. No doubt a certain number of clerks do contrive to rise to better positions, but the overwork, worry, and meagre salary kill initiative and imagination in the vast majority, who become mere machines for register- ing and supervising the increase of wealth, such a minute portion of which finds its way into their poor shabby pockets. Their lot is a most miserable one, and at present there seems little prospect of its being improved. The condition of the working classes, on the other FACTORIES 279 hand, has undoubtedly improved ; to begin with, their hours are shorter and they get more pay. If, however, their wages are higher, they are looked upon more as mere moneymaking machines than they were in the past. In the eighteenth century the social bonds between master and man were promoted by many things which would now be considered out of date. Employers and workpeople, both in town and country, were in close touch. Employe's often lived with their master and his family, while in the farmhouses it was quite usual for a farmer to work and take his meals with his labourers. Many industries were carried on in the people's own homes. Machinery put an end to all this. Its introduction was at first anything but welcome. It would almost seem as if the working classes, when they wrecked new labour-saving inven- tions, had some kind of premonition of the soul- crushing factory system which in a way has effectually enslaved their descendants. Notwithstanding this the workers, though in strict justice they may not have received quite their fair share of the increased commercial prosperity which has produced so many millionaires, have more reason to be satisfied than other classes with appearances to keep up. The present factory system in the future will probably be much improved and humanized. Progress in the storage of energy and the perfection of machinery may enable a great output to be produced with a very moderate amount of work. Nevertheless, thoughtful people, while reluctantly 280 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS recognizing its necessity, must always regret the days when even the simplest necessities of life were made by craftsmen, many of whom took a real delight in the perfection of their handiwork. If factories continue to exist and under modern conditions, and as far as we can see, they must exist I do not for a moment believe that posterity will allow enormous profits to be made out of them by one man, his family, or by a group of shareholders, without those who produce the wealth having a larger share the factory hand will receive more pay and have more leisure, by which means his class will be levelled up. Not Socialism but Co-operation will probably bring this about. When in ancient days an individual accumulated so much wealth or land that he seemed likely, owing to his power, to become a danger to the State, which at that time really meant the King, his wings were very soon clipped. In mediaeval times monarchs were found to load their favourites with enormously valuable gifts, but the lavish grants of the Crown were checked by the power of resumption. Most of the vast estates seized and retained by William the Conqueror were dissipated by William Rufus. The Crown was at one time com- pelled to resume the grants, portions of its ancient inheritance, which had been alienated by Edward III and Richard II. The same kind of thing occurred in the reigns of Henry VI and Henry VII. No one ventures to dispute that this power of resumption in connexion with properties and land RESUMPTION 281 on the whole worked out for the benefit of the country. But there is no resumption of the enormous fortunes made out of labour by modern owners of capital. The freedom of a comparatively few to make exaggerated profits at the expense of the whole com- munity is practically unchecked. I am not, of course, denying that a number of manufacturers are useful to the community or advocating confiscation ; I cannot, however, help thinking that the day will come when at least a moderate proportion of the gigantic fortunes made out of factories will in some form or other be allocated for the benefit either of those who spend their whole existence in them or for the general purposes of the State. A regular scale will, I believe, be adopted for every trade and profession, setting forth the minimum pro- portion of profit which must be paid to the individuals who produce it. Though in many things strongly opposed to what are claimed to be the ideals of modern democracy, I can never understand how sensible and thoughtful people can be surprised at the efforts of the worker to obtain better wages for his work. Self-preservation is the first law of nature, and he who finds himself born into a state of life where he is obliged to slave for other people is undoubtedly justified in seeking to improve his condition. Workmen, and even labourers, are better paid than of yore, but when all is said and done, the fact remains that there are more people in England to-day 282 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS leading wretched and poverty-stricken lives than there were a hundred years ago. The objection that, considering the great increase of population, the proportion is less, is a mere quibble. If there had been any great amount of real progress, poverty and misery would have been reduced to a minimum ; as it is, the sum of human suffering stands higher than it ever stood before. Of course it is ridiculous to think (as some visionaries like to do) that poverty and misery will be entirely swept away. There will always be poor people and also wretched ones, but under a proper system there should be no reason why any really worthy man, woman, or child should be insufficiently fed or clothed or lack a decent roof over their heads. On the other hand, the utterly worthless Nature's mistakes after being given several fair chances, will be segregated under special discipline suited to their needs. The only true remedy for social ills, though many dispute it, is education. I do not mean what usually passes for it, but real practical training devised to meet the needs of various types. At present children of widely differing mental capacity are all lumped into the same educational boat. Under a proper system only those showing signs of real intelligence would be taught advanced subjects, and thus much energy, ability, and time would be saved to overworked teachers. Self-improvement is not a mere empty sound ; the reward in some shape or other must be satis- NATIONAL NON-EDUCATION 283 factory. The humblest ranks have their heroes as well as the titled and noble. Knowledge will obey the call made upon her, whether it be by rich or poor. But knowledge cannot be induced by mere cramming. Plato observed that the minds of children were like bottles with very narrow mouths if you attempted to fill them too rapidly much knowledge was wasted and little received, whereas, with a small stream, they were easily filled. Those who would make young children prodigies act as wisely as if they would pour a pail of water into a pint measure. The whole of our system of national education, which is really the most important thing of all, needs careful revision. After all, as Schopenhauer said, you can teach a child to worship anything even a teapot. Why should we not be able to teach the children of Eng- land to worship the ideal of good citizenship, efficiency, and general knowledge ? Socialism, whether Revolutionary or Fabian, ad- mirable as are a number of its aims, will probably never effect any serious amelioration of the present really miserable state of affairs. A body of strong, powerful, ruthless, matter-of-fact but highly intelligent men, on the other hand, might do it, and in spite of my own mental bent, which inclines me to believe that the future of the world will be something of the kind pictured in the pessi- 284 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS mistic "1'Ile des Penguins" of Anatole France, I believe that some day they will. In the accomplishment of such a great purpose, much top-hamper in the shape of traditional ideas, now very dear to many, will have to be swept away. Much which now influences our lives and thoughts, born of ecclesiastical influence and the dead hand of medisevalism, will have to go. The real democracy of the future which it is to be hoped will in reality be an aristocracy of intelli- gence, intellect, and common sense drawn from all classes will probably discard many shibboleths dear to so-called democratic leaders of to-day. My im- pression is that in the far future we shall go back to some modification of the old slave system, in which worthless people will be obliged to work for those of higher mental development. Also I am convinced that, in the ages to come, population will be very strictly limited. To my mind there is nothing so symptomatic of the collective idiocy of humanity than the congratulations which follow upon any announcement of some town having doubled its population since the last century, or the laments over the failure of the French to multiply themselves with indecent speed. The only real reason for desiring an enormous population is a secret wish to be able to browbeat or overpower some other nation, and, with the alteration in modern ways of fighting, it is becoming doubtful whether even this will remain a good reason. With changed methods of fighting, numbers do not tell as they did in old days. MILLIONS OF WEAKLINGS 285 The population of a country, strictly speaking, according to the decrees of Nature (which the modern world thinks of small importance), should be limited to its natural food supply. England, I believe, is at most able to support some twenty millions. The number of inhabitants at present is a good deal more than double that figure, but, of course, allowance must be made for emigration and wastage. At present thousands have to live upon preserved foods and the like, which probably have a tendency to weaken the national stamina. The true race-suicide is the multi- plication of feeble individuals. A dozen men of strong constitution are worth fifty weaklings. The objection that limiting the population is con- trary to Nature cannot seriously be sustained the ants limit the size of their communities in accordance with their food supply. Ecclesiastics, of course, are always urging the populace to marry early and have large families. This, no doubt, was an excellent thing for the nomadic Jews of the Bible, roaming about with their flocks and herds, with huge tracts of country to wander over, but for the modern town-dweller it generally means the annihilation of all comfort, decency, and health I will not add culture ; a man and woman living with a large family in poverty in a slum cannot of necessity, except in very rare cases, be expected to rise much above the level of their ancestors of a primaeval age. This partiality of the Church for a high birth-rate, undoubtedly the main cause of enormous misery and 286 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS poverty, must alienate many who attach less im- portance to mere traditional superstition than to ordinary common sense. The newly developed habit of calling for legislation against immorality, which the Church confesses itself impotent to check, is another cause which, if carried to an extreme, will further weaken its prestige. The principal exponent of this new school of Churchmen is the Bishop of London, a good and sincere man, capable of exhibiting an almost savage ferocity as regards the moral lapses of men. His ruthlessness towards illicit love in some respects resembles that of the austere priest in Zola's charming and poetic " La Faute de 1'Abbe Mouret." No better picture of certain dehumanizing effects of celibacy has ever been drawn than this. Over-population is, undoubtedly, the main cause of all the misery which produces Revolutionary Socialism, many apostles of which, paradoxically enough, become dangerous fanatics, owing to their sensitive natures and goodness of heart, which cannot bear the con- templation of so much apparently needless suffering. From a merely selfish point of view the well-to-do classes, which themselves have of late begun to manifest a partiality for small families, should realize the danger which looms ahead. A single snowflake who cares for it ? But an unlimited mass of snowflakes obliterating the land- marks, drifting over the doors, gathering upon the mountains to crash in avalanches who does not care for that ? FALLACIOUS FORECASTS 287 Is it not better to face facts as they are, and thus pave the way for avoiding the crash, than to com- placently say, " Well, after all, nothing very much will happen in my time ! " When discussing this question people usually argue that "disease or war will keep the population down if it grows inconveniently big," This is "the everything comes right in the end, don't you know " attitude. War, though sometimes sport to the rich, it is true, has always been death to the poor, but though it on occasion undoubtedly develops splendid and virile qualities, it can scarcely be relied upon as an ideal instrument of progress. Disease, with all its mental and physical torture, is an avowed curse of human existence which every one, without exception, would like to see mitigated to the greatest possible extent. Nevertheless, we are bidden to cheerfully look to these two curses to control the future of the human race. Another and more thoughtful school of sociologists pins its faith to democracy, by which it means various ideas and nostrums thrust upon the proletariat by rather clever faddists drawn from an entirely different class. As a matter of fact, it seems to me very doubtful if the present brand of democracy, as it is understood to-day, will count for anything in the future. Much was expected from the extension of the franchise by ardent Radicals of a past generation which relied too much upon representative govern- 288 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS ment. In reality, the form of a government is of little importance the essential thing is that it should govern well. Up to the present time democracy has settled nothing. With its rise to power, the House of Commons, how- ever, has lost much of its prestige, while many sensible people openly declare their disgust with so- called representative institutions. It must, however, be remembered that what we call " democracy " is, after all, of but quite recent origin a thing of yester- day, indeed, born of the great French Revolution and the weakness of Louis XVI. Contrary to current opinion, the collective judgment of the masses is far from being infallible they have so little time to think. Why any sane people should imagine that a number of fools should produce more wisdom than a selected few, except if it be granted that one fool counteracts another, I have never been able to understand. We have got to look at the world not as we would wish it to be, but as it is. It has always abounded with idiots too dull to be employed and knaves too sharp to be trusted. It is absurd to pretend that the masses are an exception to this rule. They are no better and no worse than the classes above them, but the conditions of their existence are unfavourable to culture and thought ; they are therefore easily led by the nose, and have few independent opinions about anything, except the pressing necessity not to starve. The aristocratic system of government in the past at least assured the ease and happiness of a certain AN UNATTAINABLE IDEAL 289 amount of privileged and fortunate individuals ; undoubtedly, it also greatly promoted art. The democratic system of the future, if it develops on the lines laid down by its leaders of to-day, bids fair to produce nothing but general mediocrity. The claim that reducing every one to the same level levelling down, not up will produce universal happi- ness would be pathetic were it not so absurd. Universal happiness is a consummation which cannot happen unless the entire nature of things is changed. When romantic generosity shall be as common as gross selfishness ; when love of power shall no longer goad men on to restless action ; when passion and will, hope and fear, love and hatred, good and evil, shall no longer sway the hearts and heads of men then, and then only, can such a forecast be realized. If, however, universal happiness on earth is an unattainable ideal, a great and general improvement in the conditions of human existence is more than probable. We stand now as regards posterity much as the cave man in his time stood to us. In the days when man, a rude, semi-savage, wandered through the primeval forests, a visitor from another world would never have anticipated the civilization of to- day, imperfect and faulty though it be ! Accordingly, looking forward over the gulf of coming centuries towards the unborn, generations of the remote future, we may fairly anticipate that they will have solved many pressing and essential problems of to-day. If to us the conditions of life entail much 290 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS sorrow, much suffering, and much needless injustice, with but a small dole of pleasure, it is at least some compensation to think that humanity in the future will move in a brighter, better-adjusted, and more cultured world than that which witnessed the struggles of its ancestors towards the light. Religion, were it to become broadminded and tolerant, might greatly assist progress ; unfortunately the reluctance of its teachers to moderate the rigidity of their tenets rather tends to minimize its influence among the masses. As John Bright once said, " The working people of the country do not care any more for the dogmas of Christianity than the upper classes care for the practise of it." Sentimentalism is another barrier in the way of real civilization we lack that robust spirit which prompted Charles Kingsley to write : "Welcome, brave North-easter, shame it is to see Odes to every zephyr, not a line to thee." Signs of a reaction against sloppy sentimentalism are not wanting ; in this direction, no one has done better service than Mr. Charles Whibley with his admirable " Letters of an Englishman." It is a pity that more clever public men do not cultivate a reputation for being stanch upholders of law, order, and the defence of property. The modern attitude towards disorder, and even towards crime, is perhaps one of the most disquieting symptoms of the times. Any one who pleads that he has a social or a political grievance seems to become, THE PROLETARIAT 291 in a way, a privileged, lawbreaker, and self-seeking agitators who make incendiary speeches are far too leniently treated. One of the great curses connected with so-called government of the people by the people is that it invariably produces a greater number of charlatans and swindlers than the worst forms of autocracy. In the heat and frenzy of the French Revolution the sordid struggle for place and power never sustained the smallest diminution ; appointments and offices were never pursued with more eagerness and intrigue than when the heads of those who gained them sat loosely on their shoulders, held on, as it were, merely by pieces of sticking-plaster. Demagogues sprang up like mushrooms, and the crop seemed to be fecundated by blood. Heads fell in all directions. It repeatedly happened that the guillotine finished off an individual newly risen to fame before the artist who had been commissioned to prepare a bust had finished his work. Frequently the original was dead before the plaster was dry. The proletariat itself cannot govern, for, owing to the struggle for existence, the workers cannot find time to reason out the many complicated problems connected with law-making and the like. Blandilo- quent agitators with a glib tongue apt at flattery naturally come to the front together with a certain number of rather clever faddists full of totally erroneous ideas as to the aspirations and needs of the class which they claim to represent. These faddists, though generally perfectly sincere, are even 292 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS more dangerous than the self-seeking representatives of the people (humanity swindlers, Bismarck called them) who make a living by stirring up class against class. Sentimentalists in a position of power are rarely able to form very just estimates either of others or of themselves. Their knowledge of themselves is obscured by egotism and pride in their fancied mission to the world ; their knowledge of others is equally clouded by lack of knowledge of human nature. Such men often live in a land of dreams, believing that the selfishness and stupidity, the deformities and disasters of humanity of the present can be easily rectified by gentleness and remonstrance. Not a few often profess unbounded sympathy for every one in general and criminals and malefactors in particular. At heart the masses, though they allow both these types of men to pose as their representatives, do not, I believe, repose any real faith in their honeyed words and abundant promises. Humanity has ever loved and will ever love a strong man, and were he to arise the whole country would be at his feet. What is wanted is a figure like Cromwell, " whose rule was to seek out men for places, not places for men." He had faith in his mission, and endeavoured to fulfil it to the utmost of his ability. Cromwell was indeed that rarest of men, an honest politician. His soul was too mighty to need a cloak, and there is no evidence he was ever actuated by ulterior motives. CROMWELL 293 From the point of view of the party which he represented he was scrupulously fair to Charles I, whose death he conscientiously considered necessary for the honour and salvation of England. By this act he deliberately exposed himself to the resentment of quite half the kingdom, and that fact ought to weigh heavily against any supposition that he was actuated by merely sordid motives. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy how little the mob appreciated all that Cromwell had done for England. After the Restoration, it was dangerous to express any sentiments favourable to the regime which had just passed away. The country at that time re- pudiated virtually every act of Cromwell and his associates, and in all legal documents the existence of the Commonwealth was sternly ignored. The super- stitious discerned the finger of Providence in the unhappy lives of most of the regicides, and the infamous ends of several of them even the glorious Milton, who entreated Cromwell to spare the King's life, narrowly escaped being hanged at Tyburn. A somewhat parallel instance in later times was the ill-fortune which seemed to attach itself to so many of those who were mainly instrumental in bringing Louis XVI to the guillotine. There is, however, little analogy between the two revolutions. The bulk of the French people thirsted for the blood of their monarch and rejoiced at his downfall. The great majority of the English nation was opposed to the dethronement, much more to the execution, of Charles, and bitterly mourned his untimely end, which even 294 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS some of his most bitter enemies deplored as a lamentable necessity. The Great Revolution of 1789 had nothing in common with the struggle between Cavalier and Roundhead. In the first-named social upheaval it was the common people against the aristocracy in the second the gentry of England were fairly dis- tributed on both sides indeed, the proletariat, except for probably suffering a good deal of inconvenience and rough treatment at the hands of both armies, were little concerned. The English aristocracy, as should be remembered to their credit, never oppressed those in a humble position of life as did the noblesse across the Channel. Considerate treatment of social inferiors in perhaps a primitive form existed in England even during the Middle Ages. After a battle, as Philip de Comminges noted, the English knights cried, " Kill the nobles, but save the men-at-arms ; " abroad it was, " Save the nobles, but kill the common soldiers." The English nobility of those far-off days practised none of the brutalities which French seigneurs con- sidered as part of their rights. Property was re- spected except after the Reformation, when the monasteries were broken up. No doubt the nobility then managed to grab a vast quantity of Church lands, but I do not see why modern Radicalism should urge that as a legitimate reason for pillaging the aristocracy of to-day. Two wrongs never yet made a right ; besides, it is doubtful whether it was not more advantageous for the people GRAB 295 at large that the vast estates accumulated by monks should pass into the hands of a nobility which, at all events, was likely to make a better use of them than the monks had done the opposition to the breaking up of the monasteries was not serious. The monks, though we surround them with a halo born of picturesque ruins, old fishponds, green lawns, and peaceful old gardens, were not popular, also they were often rapacious. At one time or another they must have owned a very large proportion of all the land in England. They were notorious grabbers, which was the reason that the populace were rather pleased than otherwise when the nobility grabbed in their turn. About the only individual indeed, other than the monks, whom this last process of grabbing seems to have upset is Mr. Lloyd George, who is never tired of alluding to the appropriation of Church lands by the wicked aristocracy. In toleration of religions, or the lack of them, England, to her honour, has always been ahead of other nations, and if the monks had deserved to remain the country would not have tolerated their expulsion. In the days when the Roman Church claimed to rule in every hamlet in the country, she inspired a deep resentment, which generations later caused an enthusiastic welcome to be accorded to the Hugue- nots, whom the insensate policy of Louis XIV, prompted by the Jesuits and old Madame de Main- tenon, drove out of France. No finer stock of men than those earnest and 29(5 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS sincere fighters against persecution ever existed, and it is pleasant to see that their strenuous and gallant efforts were not all in vain. All over Europe their descendants have done much for the cause of true liberty and true progress. We have only to glance at the history of our manufactures to see how enormously these French exiles benefited England. This is not the place to deal with technical matters, but indirectly a large number of modern conveniences and inventions are the outcome of Huguenot brains. As soldiers, the descendants of the brave French Protestants are still unrivalled : witness the Boers and many gallant English soldiers. The military history of numbers of Huguenot families is glorious in the extreme, and in this age of monuments and of the entente cordiale it seems a pity that, somewhere on the cliffs facing France, there should not be erected a memorial giving the names of the many gallant men of French descent who have given their lives for the country which sheltered their fofefathers in the dark days of bigotry and persecution. Personally, I have such an intense admiration for the Huguenots that I at once feel interested when- ever I meet any one coming of that stock. I believe if a complete record could be found, it would be dis- covered that a very large proportion of those who have contributed to modern civilization and progress are of Huguenot descent ; besides this, as a rule, no matter what position in life they occupy, they are generally real gentlemen at heart the Boers, in spite of their uncouth ways, are described as having a THE HUGUENOTS 297 certain innate dignity, which, considering their up- bringing and surroundings, is only to be explained by their French ancestry. It is curious to speculate as to how France would have developed had Roman Catholicism never been its State religion. At one time such a state of affairs was not entirely without the bounds of possibility, for it is said that almost one-third of the population belonged or were favourably inclined to the faith which Henri IV abandoned. "Paris vaut bien une messe," said he; and no doubt, in addition to personal considerations of great weight, there were many other reasons for ending the fratricidal struggles which distracted his country. At the same time a Protestant France would have been far more formidable from every point of view. As it was, Roman Catholicism triumphed for a while, but the result to-day is that modern France is practically an agnostic nation which regards clerical- ism as a relic of an unenlightened age. Napoleon at one time hesitated as to what form of religion he should impose upon the French. His decision to revive Roman Catholicism was based upon the conviction that it was the most likely to ensure the continuance of the Imperial regime. The persecution of the Huguenots is yet vaguely remembered by the French proletariat ; how else can the complacent acceptance of the law abolishing the monasteries be accounted for? Even in the district where was situated the Grande Chartreuse, most of the monks of which were retired military 298 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS men who spent their lives in doing good, the Deputies who voted for the expulsion were after- wards returned by enormous majorities ; this must have been almost purely atavistic hatred of the Roman Church, for nothing could have been more beneficial to the interests of the countryside than the famous clerical manufactory of chartreuse, the receipt for which was originally given to the Car- thusians in the seventeenth century by the Marechal d'Estr^es. In connexion with this expulsion, all sorts of reports were circulated to arouse public feeling against the monks. The most absurd of these was the gross libel that they promoted intemperance by the distri- bution of their famous liqueur ! The real truth was that they very rightly allowed their workpeople to have one glass of chartreuse a day if they cared to do so. Many other similar libels were current, but in all probability none of them much influenced the electorate, who were quite determined to make an end of monastic institutions. The monks of the Grande Chartreuse had been expelled once before. Will they ever return ? At present it seems unlikely, but monks have a curious way of slipping back to their old resting-places, and anything is possible in France. The French Government, I believe, mindful of the homing tendencies of religious congregations, have drafted all sorts of drastic ordinances designed to prevent such a return. No Englishman (prob- ably no foreigner), I believe, is allowed to purchase RETROSPECTION 299 any of the buildings which have been confiscated by the State, and even a French purchaser has to give a guarantee that he will not allow or connive at such buildings being devoted to any but purely secular purposes. In England there are many legends of ill-luck attached to old country houses standing on the site of monasteries, and in a minor degree the same tradition seems arising as to confiscated French monastic property to-day. A large hotel on the site of a monastery near Paris, I was told, has been singularly unfortunate, and all sorts of superstitions as to old convents which have been put to secular uses prevail. There are certainly quite a curious number of tragic incidents connected with places like Newstead Abbey, Cowdray, Coldham Hall, and many other buildings. The ground on which the Carlton Hotel stands, it is said, was, up till recently, under a curse owing to out- rages committed upon a religious community in a long- past age. When, however, the present Carlton Hotel Company was formed, one of the directors, being a pious Catholic, by means of a diplomatic intermediary, got the Catholic authorities to remove the curse, with, I believe, benefit to the dividends. *#=**# During the eighteenth century, though the working classes showed some slight symptoms of awakening from political sleep, there was little social unrest. The people being for the most part totally uneducated had, of course, no share in the government. To 300 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS most people at the present this seems wrong and unjust, but it must be remembered that owing to various causes lack of communications, of training colleges, and many other institutions popular educa- tion as we see it to-day would then have been an impossibility. On the other hand, to have allowed the illiterate labourers, artisans, and workmen of that day to vote would have been madness in its most virulent form. The consequence was that members of the House of Commons were for the most part the nominees of great nobles, wealthy landowners, and people with a large stake in the country. In theory this system was indefensible, but in practice it did not work out ill. The third Earl of Darlington, afterwards Marquis of Cleveland, though a wise and statesmanlike peer of very liberal views, when taunted with being a borough- monger, freely owned that he had purposely, at great expense, obtained the control of his boroughs because such property was so often used for improper purposes, and there was no other mode of counteracting those who thus used it. A certain Lord Lonsdale reduced boroughmonger- ing to a science. He held some property in the little rotten borough of ftaslemere, now disfranchised, and in order to return its two members he actually im- ported into it forty Cumberland colliers who were provided with cottages and were paid half a guinea a week each for twenty years, in return for which they only had to record their votes for two of the Earl's nominees, who each drew some thousands annually of LIGHT AND AIR 301 public money. This same Lord Lonsdale at one time returned the two members for Cumberland, but at one election the Duke of Portland started an opposition candidate. The result was that the two noblemen spent between them no less than ; 100,000 in the contest, and would no doubt have spent a good deal more. Happily for their pockets, however, they agreed to save their money in the future by each nominating one member. Altogether Lord Lonsdale managed to return no less than nine members to the House of Commons, where they were known as 41 Lord Lonsdale's people." All this sounds very shocking to modern ears ; but it may be asked, considering that the great majority of the population was totally ignorant and uneducated and also that the upper classes then possessed a real political sense of governing according to the needs of that day, what other system would have been possible? Though morally indefensible, the boroughmongering really amounted to but a side issue ; the electorate as we see it to-day had no vote and were not fit to vote ; all that was to come later on, bringing with it the results that we now see. The worst effect produced by the pre- Reform Bill system of government was in my opinion the enclo- sure of so much common land. Our ancestors of course did not know of what benefit open spaces would be to a posterity much of which lives cooped up in towns. This shortsighted policy deprived a section of the populace of its rightful share of light and air. 302 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS During the reigns of the first three Georges, the House of Commons was constantly passing Enclosure Acts. It did not, it is true, always do so from motives of greed; in many cases there was a justifiable desire to increase production. The result, however, was that far too many acres of common land were taken away from their rightful owners and in this matter the people have a real grievance against their rulers of the past. On the other hand great landlords and landowners within more recent times have been very generous in presenting public parks and facilitat- ing the acquisition of open spaces this, however, does not wipe out injustice sustained in the past. Another mistake made by a large number of old- fashioned peers and landowners was keeping the newly made railways as far on the outskirts of their estates as possible, thus, unwittingly, hindering the prosperity of small country towns and impoverishing their suc- cessors. The very last speech which Lord Eldon probably one of the greatest reactionary extremists who ever lived made in the House of Lords was against the Bill authorizing the Great Western Railway rail- ways being, as he told his fellow- peers, dangerous innovations. Nevertheless, taking it all in all, the England of the past was happy and content. " I have seen," wrote Chateaubriand, " the famous British Parliaments in all their power. What will they become ? " I have seen England with its ancient customs THE CHARM OF ENGLAND 303 enjoying its ancient prosperity : everywhere the solitary little church with its tower, the country churchyard of Gray ; everywhere roads narrow and well kept, valleys teeming with cattle, fields dotted over with sheep, parks, mansions, towns, few great woods, few birds, and the breeze from the sea. . . . " Enfin, telle qu'elle etait," continues he, " cette Angleterre, entouree de ses navires, couverte de ses troupeaux et professant le culte de ses grands hommes, etait charmante et redoutable." INDEX Abergavenny, Lord, 45 Advertising, 177, 178 Esthetes of the seventies, 179, 180 Afghanistan, Ameer of, 217; his strange regiment, 217 Americans, 4, 5, 6 Anarchism, its theories and leaders, 155-7 Anti-Betting Bill, Lord Newton's, 274, 276 Anti-Moneylending Bill, Lord Newton's, 272-6 Architecture ineptness of modern English, 169 Aristocracy, 7, 8, 10, n, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 23 Art, indifference of the English to, 160 Automobile, influence of on clothes, 193 Baccarat, 79 Bamboozling constituencies, 16 ; superiority of Liberals in, 51 Bands, silent, 233 Bank balance, mania for large, 266, 267 " Bankers' furniture," 175 Barrington, Charles, the late Mr., seeC. B. Beaconsfield, Lord, 32, 43-6 ; his generosity, 44, 47 Bearskin cap, its evolution, 229, 230 Beefsteak Club (Cambridge), 62 Bennett, Little, the late, 76, 77 Besant, the late Sir Walter, 57 Bignon's, 120 ; supper-party at, 121, 122 Billington Greig, Mrs., her ex- posure of the White Slave Trade agitation, 253, 254 Blackwood, 137 Blessing of the swords, the, 243 Bliicher, effects of a good dinner upon, 108, 109 Blue Posts, the, 95 Bois de Boulogne, its memories, 140 ; appearance during the Second Empire and later, 140, 141 Boulanger, General, 144, 145-7 ' cunning manoeuvres employed to defeat his schemes, 148-50 Bouquet, Lieutenant-Colonel, 242 Bouquier, astounding report fur- nished by, 187 Bowes, Mr. (owner of Derby winner, 1835), 63 Bradlaugh, Charles, 51-3 Brampton, Lord, 256, 257 306 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Brebant's, 1 19, 120 Bright, John, 290 Bristol (restaurant), 95, 96 Bucks and Beaux, 26, 58 Buddhism, 260, 261 Bulgarians, atrocities on and by, 34-6 Burdett-Coutts, Baroness, 95 Byron, 38 Cafe Anglais, in, 116 Cafe de la Madeleine, no Cafe des Ambassadeurs, 120 Cafe d'Orleans, no Cafe du Roi, concerning the, 112 Cafe Royale, 94 Cambridge, late Duke of, 236 Campeggio, Cardinal, 92 Cannon, ornamental, of Cromwell and Louis XIV, 241 Cap, modern cloth, 202 ; a vulgar and plebeian head covering, 202 Cap, various forms of, 196, 197 Carbineers, 231, 232 Cardigan, Lord, 241 Careme, 107 Carl ton Hotel, 299 Carlton Restaurant, 100 Carnot, the great, 223 Carnot, the late president, 151, 152, 153 ; recollections of his funeral, 153, 154 Casimir Perier, president, 154 Cavalry helmet, French, 215, 216 C. B. (the late Mr. Charles Barring- ton), anecdotes concerning, 73-91 Cecil family, 55, 56 Cent Gardes, 220, 222 Champagne Charley, 72 Charles I, costume during reign of, 201 Chartreuse, Grande, the, 297, 298 Chateaubriand, 28, 302 Chinese, abandonment of national dress by officials, 204, 205, 206 Chinese Labour, a shameless and infamous cry, 47, 48 Clerk, hard lot of the, 278 Cleveland, Mrs., her protest against abandonment of ancient Japanese court costume, 207 Cocked hat, 195 Coffee taverns, 95 Cogitants, the, 262 Combat des Animaux, le, 64 Comminges, Philip de, 294 Common land, 301, 302 Conan Doyle, Sir A., 64 Conservatives, futile tactics of, 43, 46 Constans, M., the late, 147 ; his astuteness in defeating General Boulanger, 147, 148 Cork Street, 95 Covent Garden Ball, practical joke at, 99, 100 Cox, Harold, Mr., 54 Craze for antiques, the, 161, 162 Cromwell, 292, 293 Curzon, Lord, his efforts to save "Globe Room" at Banbury, 163 Daly's, 104 Darlington, Lord, 300 Dejeau, Napoleonic general fond of entomology, 224, 225 Detaille, M., strange failure of his designs for dress of French army, 227, 235 Devonshire, Duke of, 41-3 Dorney Court, 200 Dreyfus, M. Abraham, 112 Dreyfus, Captain, 157-9 Drummond Wolff, the late Sir Henry, 51, 52, 53 Drunkards' colony, 249 INDEX 307 Duels, curious, 140 Dufferin, the late Lord, 153 Dundas, Admiral, 247 Durand's, 107 Dysart, Lord, anecdote concern- ing, 267, 268 Edward VII, 3, 5 Egan, Pierce, 62,63, 7> 7 2 Eiger, ascent of by C. B., 90 Eldon, Lord, 302 Empire, people who preferred it to the Alhambra at Granada, 162 "En Revenantde la Revue," famous song sung by Paulus, 144 English of Victorian Era, 172-4, 181-3 English Review, 253 Erskine, Lord, 252 Eton, 95, 105, 164 Exercise, 258 Exhibition of 1851, 176 Factory system, 177, 279 Fad, development of a, 248 Faillieres, M., 152 Fashions, feminine, 189, 190 Fathi Ali Shah, 203 Feather bonnet saved by Queen Victoria, 235 Filson Young, Mr., an able critic of modern methods, 172 France, Anatole, 284 Francis I, 109 French rule, popularity of, 151 Freres Provcncaux (restaurant), 109 Fresh air, 257, 258 " Gaby Glide," the, 234 Gaelic, anecdote concerning, 192, 193 Gaiety Theatre, 104 Garibaldi, 241 Garrick, stage costume of, 201 Gendarmerie, French, 222 George IV, King, 67, 190 Globe room at Banbury and in- difference of inhabitants of latter town to its removal, 162-3 Gladstone, Mr., 33-41, 48 ; noble speech of, 53 Gordon Lennox, Lady Algernon, her efforts to save "Globe Room" at Banbury, 163 Grande Seize, a famous private room in the Cafe Anglais, in Graphic, the, 137 Gray, the ipoet, 302 Grevy, M., 152 Hamilton, Duke of, 117 Handel, 108 Hand-made goods, 177 Harris, Sir Augustus, 99, 100 Haruko, Empress, 206 Hebraic domination of Society, 2, 3 Henry IV, 132, 297 Hewson, late Mr., 85, 86, 87 Hogarth, 12 Hogge, Mr. James, 274 Hollow Sword Blade Company, 239 House of Commons, faddist legis- lation in, 252 House of Temperley, 64 Huguenots, 295, 297 Human Opticon, the Great, 86 Japanese, adoption of European dress by, 204, 206-9 Jubilee Juggins, 96 Kelly, Captain, 88 Kelvin memorial window, strange design of, 168, 169 308 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Kemble, John, invents composite stage costume, 201 Khaki, 217, 218, 235 King of Westphalia, anecdote of, 113-16 King, Mr. Josiah, 252 Kingsley, Charles, 290 Kiinstler Lexicon, Nagler's, 65 Latham of the Buffs and his gallantry at Albuera, 242, 243 Latham, Hubert, aviator, 243 Lee, Mr. Arthur, 254 Lee, the late Rev. Bolles, and his protest against removal of Winchester College panelling, 165 L' Estrange, 87 Leveson-Gower, Mr., his efforts to combat vandalism, 164-6 Lewis, Sam, 268-7 1 Light Dragoons, 218 Liverpool, Lord, his gloomy fore- cast, 29 Lloyd George, Mr., 48-50, 55, 295 London, Bishop of, 286 Lonsdale, Lord, 300, 301 Loti, Pierre, 206 Louis XIV, 198, 241 Louis Philippe, 109; attempt upon, 133 Louis XVI, 288, 293 Lowenthal, Dr., his curious re- ligion, 262 Luchet, M., 109 Lyndhurst, Lord, 196 Mabille, 141, 142 McCalmont, Colonel, 77 Macaulay, Catherine, 30, 31 Mackenzie Grieves, late Mr., 25, 26 Maintenon, Madame de, 295 Maison d'Oree, in, 116-19 Maison d'Oree Club, 117 Malahide, Grey (steeplechaser), 89, 90 Marat, his house, 134 Marconi affair, 49, 50, 51, 53 Marrying for money, 6, 7, 1 1 Martin, late Mr. Bob (Ballyhooley), 87 Martin, Richard, 252 Materialism, 263 Mikado, the late, 209 ; devotion to, 209, 210 Milne, the late Mr. and his collec- tion, 214 Milor of the past, 127 Moneylending, 271-4 Moore, Tom, 16, 23 Morning Post, 254 Mundig (racehorse), 63 Murray, Lord, 50 Napoleon, 38, 132, 137, 215, 216, 217, 219, 223-7 Napoleon III, 132, 134, 135, 141 Nasreddin, Shah of Persia and his dress, 198, 199 Navy, 13 Neitzsche, 8 Newton, Lord, 272-6 Nikko, author's experience at, 208 Nogi, General, his heroic self- sacrifice, 210, 211 " Nut," the, 25 ; description of his ideals by Byron, 58 Officers' uniform, cost of, 231 Opera Comique, author's reminis- cences of its being on fire, 118 Overpopulation, evils of, 284-6 Palace of peace, 250 Paris, recollections of, 123, 154 ; hotels of, 123, 124 INDEX 309 Paul Prys, legislative, 250 Paulus (famous cafe concert singer), 120, 143-5 Peel, Sir Robert, 72 Peers, old and new, 17, 18, 20, 24, 28, 41, 42 Phonetic spelling, 266 Pickelhaube, 214 Pineapple, first raised in England, 200 Poincare, M., 234 Preservation of Ancient Buildings, the Society for, and its admir- able but little appreciated efforts to check vandalism, 167 Prince Imperial, his dislike to the Grenadier cap, 220-1 " Progressive " fads, 249, 250 Protestantism, 265 Punch, its composition, 60 Punch, its youth revived under new editor, 71 Renan, quotation from, 27 Restaurants of London, 92-107 ; of Paris, 107-22 " Restoration," artistic horrors of, 166 Resumption, 281 Revolutionary vandalism, 184-8 Richard (waiter at Sheridan Club, Dublin), 78, 79 Rifles, 6oth, 242 Ritz, M., 92, 105 Roman Catholicism, 264, 297 Rome, 191 Rose, gardener of Charles II, 200 Rosebery, Lord, 49 Rotten Row, 194 Rotterdam, recent destruction of old English church there dis- creditable to everyone con- cerned, 166 Rue de Rivoli, the, 129-31 Russian military uniform (modern), 226, 227 Sala, George Augustus, 181 Sam Lewis, 96 Savoy restaurant, 50, 96, 97, 100, 102, 106 Scarsdale, Lord, 12 Schopenhauer, 283 Seaman, Owen, Mr., 70 Seymour, Lord Henry, 128, 133 Shaftesbury, Lord, 95 Shako, designs for new, 230 Sheridan Club and its members account of, 73-91 Shooting, 9, 10 Sievier, Mr. Robert, 276 Simon Pure, 65, 66 Sinecures, 20-3 Slash, the, 229 Smart set, 3 Socialism, 280, 283,286 Society, i, 2, 8, 32, 33 Stephen's Hotel, 98 Stratford, Esme-Wingfield, Mr., 39 Sylvain, M., proprietor of Durand's, 144 Tcheng-ki-Tong, the late General, 135 Temperance, 248 Territorial system, 236 Terry, Major-General, 213 Thibaudin, General, abolishes drums in French army, 219 " Tom and Jerry," 63-72 ; amusing skit in Punch, 70, 71 Toole, the late Mr., 135 Top-hat, its rise and survival, 194, 195 Tourist, the English, 126, 127 310 FANCIES, FASHIONS, AND FADS Tuileries, the, 131, 132 Turban, 203 Uniform, 212-47 Uniform, naval, 246, 247 Unionist party, impotence of, 55 Valentin le Desosse, recollections of this celebrated dancer, 141-3 Vandyke, 201 Vefour (restaurant), 109 Vegetarianism, 259 Verdier, M., 116 Very (restaurant), 109 Victorian taste, 172-4, 181-3 Virginia, governorship of, 21 "Wacht am Rhein," sung by Bavarians after entry into Paris, 138 Waldron, Mr. John, 88, 89 Ward Hunt, staghounds, 88 ; cup, 88 Warders of the Tower, their uniform, 232, 233 Wellington, Duke of, his dinner to Bliicher, 108, 109 ; his habit of discouraging officers from wear- ing uniform, 245 ; other refer- ences to, 13, 29 Whibley, Mr. Charles, 290 Whipping-posts, 249 Whistler, his designs for Savoy Restaurant, 97 White Slave Trade, agitation con- cerning, 253, 254 Wille, 185 Willoughby de Broke, Lord, 253 Winchester College panelling, re- moval of, 164, 165 Winning Post, 276 Woman's Suffrage, 56, 248 Yuan Shi Kai adopts European dress, 206 Zimmermann, General, taken for the Emperor William I, 137 Zola, Emile, 159 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. NO PHONE RE MAR 12 1986 1997 MEW;. A 000028257 4