JTHE CAREER OF THE GOD-IDEA IN HISTORY BY HUDSON TUTTLE, AUTHOR OF "ARCANA OF NATURE," "ORIGIN AND ANTIQUITY OF MAN," ETC. Dwelling in the light that no man can approach unto. . . . Canst thou, by searching, find out God? . . . Touching the Almighty, we cannot find him out. BIBLE. Nothing of him that doth fade, But doth suffer a sea-change Into something rich and strange. SHAKESPEARE. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY ADAMS & CO. No. 25 BROMFIELD ST. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1869, by ADAMS & CO., in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts. PREFACE. MANKIND, having wearily traversed the marsh-lands of metaphysical and theological speculation, are gaining the firm shore of positive science. The sun of a new era is dawning on the mental horizon of the world. Before its beams can fully penetrate our being, we must discard the old, and turn, self-reliant, to the new. I have written this volume because I think it is demanded. HUDSON TUTTLE. CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION >:.:;* 7 I. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE HINDOOS . . . .23 II. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE EGYPTIANS, CHALDEANS, AND PERSIANS 37 III. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE JEWS 53 IV. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE ARABIANS .... 63 V. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE GREEKS AND ROMANS . . 70 VI. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE ALEXANDRIAN SCHOOL AND EARLY CHRISTIANITY 109 6 Contents. VII. PACK THE GOD-IDEA OF THE LATER PHILOSOPHERS . 131 VIII. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE BIBLE . . . . . .145 IX. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE BORDER-RELIGIONS, CHI- NESE, DRUIDS, SCANDINAVIANS, AND AZTECS . .151 X. . CONCLUSION ULTIMATE OF THE GOD-IDEA . . 181 INTRODUCTION. ^ I^HE first great religious idea is the idea of JL God. Samuel Longfellow. Every miracle, if it existed, would lead to the conviction that the creation is not deserving the respect which all pay to it ; and the mystics would necessarily be obliged to deduce from the imperfec- tions of the created world the imperfections of the Creator. Cotta. Miracles are great horrors in the domain of sci- ence, when not blind faith, but conviction derived from knowledge, is of any value. Jouvenal ob- serves, " There is neither chance nor miracle : there exists but phenomena governed by laws." Giebel. No force can originate from nothing. Liebig. An absolute nothing is not cogitable. Ozolbe. Matter is uncreatable, as it is indestructible. Vogt. 8 Career of the God-Idea in History. God is a blank sheet, upon which nothing is found but what you have yourself written. Luther. Man depicts himself in his gods. Schiller. Matter and its laws are eternal. Arcana. " What and where is God ? " is a question which has been reiterated by the sage and the savage, the wise and the foolish, from immemorial time. It was one of the first great problems presented* for solution, and is now the first to which childhood requires an answer. Who can fathom its depths ? Which of the countless attempted solutions is the true ? Are any correct ? This is a vast subject, and leads at once to forbid- den fields. The traveler is constantly in danger of being decried as sacrilegious, as though the gods in their high estate can be harmed by the efforts of puny mortal. If they can, theirs is the fault, not the mortal's whom they have created. The discussion of the God-idea, to the scientist, is the same as that of any principle. A rock, a tree, an insect, are as sacred as God, being a part of him, or portions of his work. It is time the sickly sentimentality of holy places and sacred things should yield to the new and sterling conceptions of the divinity of man, and the Godhood of nature. My endeavor is to treat the gods of the nations and ages with equal respect and equal scrutiny. Therein lies the danger. It is unobjectionable thus Impartiality of View. 9 to speak of all others except our own. The theolo- gies of other peoples are mythologies and subjects of ridicule. Ours is the only true theology ; and to speak of God in the same breath with Jupiter, Brahma, or Vishnu, is profanation. But our true theology^ is., a ridiculous myth to the Hindoo, the Persian, or Buddhist. There are as many theologies as there are peoples ; and the devotees of each are equally devoted, equally exclusive, and certain that they have the only sacred system in the world. All rest on the same basis, and stand or fall together. A greater devotion and earnestness can- not be claimed for one than another. Those sys- tems which we regard as the most false, paradox- ical as it may appear, awaken the greatest intensity of zeal. The worshiper of Brahma will suffer death with equal fortitude as the Christian martyr. Death has been preferred by every heathen nation to be- stowing worship on a foreign god. Callisthenes vehemently opposed paying divine honors to Alexander, because such adoration would confound human and divine worship, which had been preserved by his nation inviolable. The Greeks, when sent on embassies to the kings of Persia, regarded it as mean and base to prostrate themselves before the throne, as such homage was allowable only to the gods.* Isocrates reproached the Per- sians for doing it themselves, because they thereby prostituted the homage of the gods to men ; and not even by violence could Xerxes compel Sperchius * Plutarch. io Career of the God-Idea in History. and Bulls to pay him honors, because it was against the laws of their country to bestow such honors.* Such was the reverence for the gods at Athens, that they executed Timagoras for paying honors to man. The idea of a supernatural cause, a divine being^ omnipotently swaying the religious feelings, and thereby the destiny of the world, has been considered universal. More careful and unprejudiced observa- tion has brought forward many examples to the con- trary. On the universality of this belief is based a proof of the existence of God. The critical study of the present has destroyed this oft-repeated evidence, f The tribes of the lake districts of Central Africa " admit neither God, angels, nor devil." \ The Tasmanians have no word for a Creator. The South-American Indians of Grau Chaco have no religious or idolatrous belief or worship whatever, neither do they possess any idea of God or of a supe- rior being. They make no distinction between right and wrong, and have therefore neither fear nor hope of any present or future punishment or reward, nor any mysterious terror of some supernatural power whom they might seek to assuage by sacrifices or superstitious rites." || * Herodotus. f " Prehistoric Times." Lubbock, p. 467. t Burton. Trans. Ette. Soc., N. S., vol. L, p. 323. Rev. T. Dove, Tasmanian Journal. I " Voice of Pity," vol. ix., p. 220. NOTE. I am indebted to Lubbock for guiding me to many of the quoted authorities. Savage Views of God. 1 1 The Caffres have no form of religion or worship. They think everything makes itself; and the only idea they seem to possess on the subject is a vague notion of an evil spirit. * The Brazilian Indians entertain a similar idea, f The Lepchas of Northern India have no religion, \ nor have the Khasias. The religious ideas of the Indians of Oregon are exceedingly low. Attempts were made to translate the word " God," but in no dia- lect in that vast territory could missionaries and skillful interpreters find an equivalent word. Their highest God was a wolf, an ideal hybrid of animal and divinity. The Kalashes Indians believe God to be a raven. Of the Tusks, a Mongolian tribe dwelling in Northwestern Asia, it is said, " Whether they have any conception of a divine providence, of a governor of the world, could not be ascertained, nor a trace found whether they worship a benevolent spirit, or demons." |j The Indian population of Rio de Janeiro have no desire for religion. The aborigines receive baptism without understanding its meaning. ^[ The Australian has no idea of a Creator,** nor have the Bechuanas, the most intelligent tribes of the interior * Burchell, " Travels in South Africa," vol. ii., p. 249. f Spix and Martius. Bates and Walace. | Hooker. " London Athenaeum," July, 1849. |( Lieut. Hooper. IT Burmeister. ** Australian und Seine. Colonien, 1849. 1 2 Career of the God-Idea in History. of Africa. Moffat, the indefatigable missionary, could not awaken the least idea of a divine being in the South African. * Of the Bechuanas he says, " They have no word in their language properly denoting God. They have no idea of an infinite being. I have often wished to find something by which I could lay hold on the minds of the natives, an altar of the unknown God, the faith of their ancestors, the im- mortality of the soul, or any religious associations ; but nothing of this kind ever floated in their minds. They looked on the sun with the eye of an ox. To tell the greatest of them that there was a creator, the governor of the heavens and earth, of the fall of man and the redemption of the world, the resurrec- tion of the dead, and immortality beyond the grave, was to tell them what appeared more extravagant, fabulous, and ludicrous, than their own vain stories about lions, jackals, and hyenas. To tell them that these (referring of course to the different elements of our creed) were articles of our faith, would extort an interjection of superlative surprise, as if it were too preposterous for the most foolish to believe." And Opperman says of the Kaffirs, " They have not the least notion of a supreme being, their chief being their God." f The Hottentots believe in a good spirit, and at the full moon worship with dancing. The Kariens of India do not believe in God, but only in the influence of two evil genii ; \ nor do some of the Sumatrian * Moffat, " South Africa." t Quo. in Staft und Stoft. Buchner. tlbid. Savage Views of God. 13 tribes. The God of the Negroes of Oucareyanua is their chief, to whom they sacrifice animals and hu- man beings. The God of the Fiji is a being with- out any feeling except hunger. He dwells with his companion in a cave, eats, drinks, and answers the questions of the priests. The reports of travelers are generally prejudiced on the religious side, and they take for granted ideas of God exist. Their not finding such ideas strength- ens their testimony. Those savage tribes said to have a God are far from possessing the Christian's idea. There is nothing infinite, eternal, connected with it. When a savage worships a snake, a stone, or bunch of rags, for a God, can it be supposed that he has any clear ideas of the God of the universe ? The Damaras are said by travelers to have a God whom they call Omakura ; but the ideas they enter- tain of him are such as children might form, and have no similarity to the Infinite whom we recognize. His attributes vary with each tribe ; each having its own Omakura, to whom it ascribes all its supersti- tions, habits, and peculiarities. The worship of Om- akura consists of many puerile observances and sac- rifices. Animals, when sacrificed, are speared to death, while those used for food are suffocated. They keep a sacred fire burning before the chiefs tent, and every possible care is taken to prevent its being extinguished. Should this calamity occur, the whole tribe are assembled, and, after large expiatory sacri- fices, the fire is again lighted by friction. 14 Career of -the God-Idea in History. When a new tribe is thrown off, they carry with them a portion of fire from the old altar. The duties of a vestal devolve on the daughter of the emigrant* There are disbelievers in the existence of a God in the midst of the highest European civilization ; and the recent census shows that six million people in England alone never enter a church, and know not to what religious sect they belong. These men are sincere, and many of them are among the great thinkers of the age. They deny, in opposition to the intense force of education and public opinion. Even those who believe find it impossible to state and prove their belief in clear and unmistakable lan- guage. The first great religious idea is that of God. From it arise all the grand systems of worship in the world, and around it cluster the hopes and aspirations of mankind. There are races who have not any defi- nite conception of God. There are others who have advanced to Fetichism ; and thence onward all grades of progress are discoverable to the most orthodox creed of the present. There is a religious element in man's nature, the product of his unanswerable aspirations, subject to the same growth and progress as his other faculties. The savage looks out on nature as an animate being. To him it has life and intelligence. He at once per- sonifies that intelligence. The air, the water, the earth, become something more than simply air, water, *Lake Ngami, pp. 219, 20. Personification of Forces of Nature. 15 earth : they are possessed of a spirit. Man sponta- neously assigns reasons for the effects he observes ; and this reference to spiritual moving agencies satis- fies the savage as perfectly as the doctrine of a final cause did the superficial philosophers of twenty-five years ago. The multitude of spiritual beings were subordi- nated to the control of superior intelligences in the desire to unitize the powers or forces of creation. Submissiveness, humility, grow out of contact with nature. The matter-of-fact scientist does not escape this feeling when witnessing the grand phe- nomena of storm or ocean. The savage is a child ; and, like a child, he falls prostrate in fear. He debases himself Before the invisible spirits who shout in the wild winds, or growl in the thunders. He believes everything to be governed by the arbi- trary will of these beings ; and, if they are interested in mortal welfare, they will heed his prayers. That they are, he does not doubt. His first conception of the object of creation is that it was designed for the especial benefit of man. Everything that conflicts with his pleasure or purposes is evil. Entirely, ex- clusively designed for man. In the sequel it will be seen how diametrically erroneous this idea proves to be. Out of it grows the priesthood, men who by superior holiness can intercede with better grace, and more hope for success, than ordinary mortals, soiled and begrimed with contact with the world. All races have acknowledged this necessity ; and 1 6 Career of the God-Idea in History. we see the germ of the priestly order in the medicine- man of the rude American Indian, and the rain- maker of the still ruder Central African. It is a wonderful history which traces from that beginning the progress of the order to the colossal proportions it assumed in India, in Egypt, or, at one time, in Catholic Europe. The priest is blameless. He did not create the organization of the human mind. The worship of idols grows out of nearly the same faculties as create the desire for priestly orders. The savage mind cannot imagine existence without personality. His" deities must be men and women. These deities being his friends, he desires, as a token, a representation of them. Between the image and the person represented, they always imagine a secret bond. Many believe, that, by making a representa- tion of their enemy, they can inflict any violence they please by simply attacking the image. To this day the custom lingers, though thoughtlessly regarded, in the popular method of expressing disapprobation by burning or hanging in effigy. The childish mind cannot worship a blank ab- straction : it makes an image of the being, worships that, feeling assured, that, by this secret connection, whatever devotion is expressed for it will be felt by the being represented. Voltaire truly remarks,* that no nation ever took the name of idolaters. It was always bestowed as a term of reproach. When the Roman and Cartha- ginian captains made a treaty, they called the gods * Phit. Die, vol. ii., p. 27. Origin of Idolatry. 1 7 to witness. " It is in their presence," said they, " that we declare peace ; " yet no image of these gods was present. They never supposed for a moment that the image constituted the divinity. Dio Chrysostom makes Phidias answer, when called to account for making a statue of Jupiter Olympus, " Mankind do not love to worship God at a distance, but to come near and feel him, and with assurance to sacrifice to and become like him : chil- dren newly weaned from their parent, who put out their hands towards them in their dreams as if they were still there, so do men, out of the sense of God's goodness, and their relation to him, love to have him represented as present with them, and so to converse with him. Thence have come all the representations of God among the barbarous nations, in mountains, trees, and stones." M. Tyrius observes in regard to statues and their worship : * " A divine nature has no need of statues or altars ; but human nature, being very imbecile, and far dis- tant from divinity, devised these symbols, in which it inserted the names and the renown of the gods. Those, therefore, whose memory is robust, and who are able, by directly extending their soul to heaven, to meet with Divinity, have perhaps no need of statues. This race is, however, rare among men ; but few of whom are not in want of this kind of assist- ance. * Quoted in "The Zendavesta and Solar Religions," by M. E. Lazarus, M. D. 1 8 Career of the God-Idea in History. " For Divinity indeed, the father and fabricator of all things, is more ancient than the sun and the heavens, more excellent than time and eternity ; is a legislator without law, ineffable by voice, or invisible by the eyes. Not being able to comprehend his essence, we apply for assistance to words and names, to animals and figures of gold and ivory and silver, to plants and rivers, to the summits of- mountains and to streams of water ; desiring indeed to understand his nature, but, through imbecility, calling him by the names of such things as appear to us to be beau- tiful. And, in thus acting, we are affected in the same manner as lovers who are delighted with sur- veying the images of the objects of their love, and with recollecting the lyre, the dart, and the seal of these ; the circus in which they all ran ; and every- thing, in short, which excites the memory of the beloved object. "What then remains for me to investigate and determine respecting statues ? Only to admit the subsistence of Deity. If the art of Phidias excites the Greeks to the recollection of Divinity ; honor to animals, the Egyptians ; a river, others ; and fire, others, I do not condemn the dissonance : let them only know, let them only love, let them only be mindful of the object they adore." Maximus of Tyre, who flourished under the An- tonines, thus wrote of God : " When men are questioned concerning the nature of the Divinity, their answers are all different : yet, notwithstanding all this prodigious variety of opin- Origin of Idolatry. 19 ions, you will find one and the same feeling through- out the earth ; viz., that there is but one God, the Father of all." The Emperor Julien made this remark on reli- giously venerating statues : " Statues and altars, and the preservation of the unextinguished fire, and, in short, all such particulars, have been established by our fathers as symbols of the worship of the gods ; not that we should believe that these symbols are gods, but that through these we should worship ..the gods." - Said a Brahman to M. Bernier : " We do not believe these statues to be Brahma or Brahm, but only their images and representations ; and we only give them that honor on account of the beings they represent. They are in our temples because it is necessary, in order to pray well, to have something before our eyes that may fix the mind ; and, when we pray, it is not the statue we pray to, but the thing represented by it" Sallust makes the admi- rable remark that " the honors which we pay to the gods are performed for the sake of our own advan- tage : and, since the providence of the gods is every- where extended, a certain habitude and fitness is all that is requisite in order to receive these benefi- cent communications ; but all habitude is produced through imitation and similitude. Hence temples imitate the heavens, and altars the earth ; statues resemble life ; prayers imitate that which is intellec- tual ; but characters, superior ineffable powers ; herbs and stones resemble matter ; and animals which are 2O Career of the God-Idea in History. sacrificed, the inactional life of our souls : but, from all these things, nothing happens to the gods beyond what they already possess ; for what occasion can be made to a divine nature ? but a conjunction be- tween our soul and God is produced." The Catholic worship of saints shows this inherent tendency of the human soul to recognize gradations of spiritual beings, and local tutelar deities ; and, in grossness of conception, it exceeds the monstrosities of any heathen religion. The progress of the God-idea, commencing, as we have seen, in utter ignorance and inconception, passes through certain stages of growth. If the histories of various peoples are examined, it will be found that this idea, beginning at the same point, runs an almost parallel course. The illustrations of this truth are fully detailed hereafter. The savage is a believer in Fetichism. He beholds in nature the manifestation of innumerable spiritual beings, unseen, irresponsi- ble, and powerful, which he regards with feelings of unmitigated fear. Knowing nothing of law, he places the gods in its place, and thus renders events mere arbitrary acts, dependent on their changing wills. This is not^antheism, which makes nature the external garb of an omnipotent being. It differs as much from that as present science differs from the charlatanism of the alchemists. It is not Polythe- ism, which is more unitary in its grasp. From it Polytheism arises by growth, by the subordination of the inferior spirits to superior beings, grading them into successive orders, reaching from the highest Rise of Pantheism. 2 1 gods down to man. Out of Polytheism sprang Dual- ism, a belief in a good and an evil deity. From Dualism springs monotheism, in regular sequence, a sublime generalization, unitizing creation, material and spiritual, under the control of one omnipotent, self-existent being. Last, in this extended series of advances, arises what may be called scientific Pantheism, which re- gards nature as one divine whole, controlled by fixed and absolute laws inherent in the constitution of matter, and which are the only expressions of divine will man can ever recognize ; a Pantheism which bestows itself on the external manifestations of law, f~~r well knowing that in that manner only can it learn anything of the divine nature, and confessing its incapacity, as finite, of ever understanding the infi- nite. _The extension of this phase of thought is re- served for the closing chapter. To fill up from the history of the world, the outline thus hastily sketched, is the purpose of the succeed- ing chapters. The antique religion of Hindostan, as the mother of a line of offspring still vigorous, claims our first attention. Egypt, her direct descendant, and Greece and Rome, follow each other. Outside of this direct line are many barbarous races, inter- esting, though not directly connected with the grand tide of progress which rolls in one continuous stream from ancient Hindostan to the present time. I do not propose to treat of religious forms, creeds, and ceremonies, except as they illustrate the ideas re- ceived of God. To separate the forms of worship 22 Career of the God-Idea in History. from their object has been a task most difficult in execution. Perhaps I have admitted such illustra- tions, in places, to an extent which mars the symmetry of the work, but no further than seemed necessary for a complete understanding of the worshiper as well as worshiped. I. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE HINDOOS. FOR God goes forth, and spreads throughout the whole, Heaven, earth, and sea, the universal soul ; Each at its birth from him all beings share, Both man and brutes, the breath of vital air ; To him return, and, loosed from earthly chain, Fly whence they sprang, and rest in God again ; Spurn at the grave, and, fearless of decay, Dwell in high heaven, and star the ethereal way. VIRGIL. To frame an adequate conception of Deity, and set this forth in words, is not only above human capability, but impossible in the nature of things. The abyss of God is not to be fathomed save by him who is All-in-all. THEODORE PARKER. IF the high antiquity claimed by the Hindoos is considered as fabulous, still they must be regarded as among the oldest of peoples. The sacred Sanskrit alone would prove them to be among the first of civilized races. Not, however, to discuss this point, we will consult their sacred books, which they believe to be as old as the crea- tion of the world.* The Vedas they hold in great- est reverence. The book is not allowed to come in * William Jones thinks the Vedas were not written before the flood ; but that they are the oldest specimen of Sanskrit, and date about a hundred years before the birth of Moses. The learned Heeren says their date is entirely obscure. His- torical Researches. 24 Career of the God-Idea in History. contact with any animal substance, nor to be read in the presence of a wicked man. Brahmans alone are allowed to read and interpret them. If a soudra impiously should open their divine pages, or even hear a passage read, the code of Menu ordains that heated wax, oil, and tin shall be poured into his ears. Inherent sacredness and supernatural pow- ers are ascribed to every word, and it is sacrilege to make the least alteration. Such is their regard for a book bearing the seal of the inspiration from high Heaven. Of God, it teaches one Supreme Being, who is one with nature, or thorough Pantheism. He is manifested in the grand phenomena of the external world, the phenomena of which are invoked as separate deities. Sun, moon, fire, air, water, and other elements and forces of nature, each have sepa- rate deities subordinate to the " One Immutable," and who are manifestations of his being. The devout worshiper comes in unison with him by contempla- tion, and subjugation of the bodily senses. In the words of the Vedas, " Any place where the mind of man can be undis- turbed is suitable for the worship of the Supreme Being." " The vulgar look for gods in water ; the ignorant think they reside in wood, brick, and stones ; men of more extended knowledge seek them in, celestial orbs ; but wise men worship the universal soul. " There is one living and true God : everlasting, without parts or passions ; of infinite power, wis- dom, and goodness ; the maker and preserver of all things." God-Idea of the Hindoos. 25 " What and how the Supreme Being is, cannot be ascertained. We can only describe him by his ef- fects and works ; in like manner as we, not know- ing the real nature of the sun, explain him to be the cause of the succession of days and epochs." " That Spirit, who is distinct from Matter, and not contained in Matter, is not various. He is ONE, and he is beyond description ; whose glory is so great there can be no image of hint; " He is the incomprehensible Spirit who illumin- ates all, and delights all ; from whom all proceed, by whom they live after they are born, and to whom all must return. Nothing but the Supreme Being should be adored by a wise man." " He overspreads all creatures. He is merely spirit without the form either of a minute body or an extended one, which is liable to impression or organization. He is ruler of the intellect, self-exist- ent, pure, perfect, omniscient, omnipresent. He has from all eternity been assigning to all creatures their respective purposes. No vision can approach him, no language describe him ; no intellectual power can comprehend him." "As the web proceeds from the spider, and is absorbed again by her ; or vegetables proceed from the earth ; as hair and nails grow from animate beings, so is the universe evolved from the one eternal and supreme Soul." " Without hand or foot, he runs swiftly, and grasps firmly ; without eyes, he sees all. He knows what- ever can be known, but there is none that know 26 Career of the God-Idea in History. him. The wise call him the great, supreme, pervad- ing Spirit." Under whatever form it may be presented, the mind wearies of the contemplation of the Infinite. It is like gazing off on a boundless sea, where noth- ing but interminable and shoreless waves fasten the attention. The overwrought faculties are palsied by the strain. Only in the contemplations of philoso- phers was the Eternal One Brahm sought or ques- tioned. He represents the ultimate of Hindoo spec- ulation. Brahma, who is one degree lower, has many points of attachment for the mind. He was a direct off- spring of the Eternal, who, after creating the waters by a thought, placed an egg in them, which, after remaining millions of years inactive, until by the energy of his own thoughts, Brahma burst its envel- ope, and sprang forth, a divine mate, famed in all worlds as the forefather of spirits. Sharing the essence of the divine mind, he is far removed above mortals, and not until a lower circle of divinities is reached do we find qualities which awake the tender sympathies of the heart. Brahm and Brahma are cold abstractions of the intellect : Vishnu and Siva are personations of human passions, and are hence beloved and feared. Brahma, although the priestly caste receive from him their name, has no temples erected to his honor, no festivals, no especial sect. Vishnu and Siva, the gods of good and evil, form, with Brahma, the Hindoo trinity. Both are repre- sented as having been incarnated many times. The God-Idea of the Hindoos. 27 former is the favorite deity ; the latter has many wor- shipers. He is the destroyer, the source of evil and misery, and is throned among the inaccessible crags of the terrible Himalaya. The idea his name calls forth is emblematized by giving his statue five faces, or one with three eyes ; with serpents suspended in his ears like jewels. His companion, Doorga, is the chief among the female deities in the Hindoo Pantheon. She is the Minerva of Greece, but more warlike and powerful. Her altars, unlike those of other gods, stream with blood ; and human sacrifice in ancient times was resorted to. By the interposition of this trinity, -the perplex- ing problem, how evil came into the world, was per- fectly solved. If the supreme Brahm is infinitely good and powerful, how can evil exist ? Siva is the god of evil; and Vishnu is not only mediator between the Supreme and man, but between the two and the Evil One. As in all other religious systems, man forms the centre around which gods and the creation of gods revolve ; but his destiny, as taught in the Vedas, is not consoling to our manner of thought. As God is everything, the human spirit must be a part of his essence ; and the most desirable termina- tion of this state of fever pains and anxieties is final absorption into him. This will be the result, if the body is perfectly subdued. The flesh is base and evil ; and, the more it is made to suffer, the more the spirit approaches the one pure Source. This idea of the sinfulness of the body was taken up by Chris- tianity, and carried to its extreme length in monastic 28 Career of the God-Idea in History. seclusion, hermitage, flagellation, and self-inflicted tortures too horrid to mention. It is still seen in penance, fasting, and prayer, and the general tone of the most liberal religions, which teach that happiness is gained, not through pleasure, but pain, by bearing a heavy and grievous cross. Buddha was an incarnation of Vishnu, and thus the Buddhists are attached to the original religion. They are the most important sect that has appeared in India. They worship spiritual intelligences, de- scended on earth in the form of saints, the greatest of whom is Buddha Sakia Mouni, from whom they de- rive their name. He is thought by scholars to have been a great reformer, who, seeing the tyranny and evil of the law of castes as taught by the Vedas, strove to abolish those various distinctions. The date of his birth is fixed differently by various nations. In Cashmere, they say his appearance dates two hun- dred years later than Chrisnu, whose advent is placed back five thousand years. The Moguls say he was born two thousand one hundred and thirty-four years before the Christian era, and the Chinese fix it at one thousand and twenty-nine years. The gigantic temples of great antiquity show that this belief in remote times possessed a strong hold on the people of India. The statues of Buddha, found in such edifices, represent him in an attitude of profound meditation, with knotted hair after the manner of hermits. He was born of a virgin named Maia : miracles announced his birth, and his life is involved in a maze of fable. The flights of imagina- God-Idea of the Hindoos. 29 tion are indulged to picture the wonderful advent. The joyful tidings were announced in the animal world ; and the birds of the Himalaya winged their way to the Palace of Kapila, and there rested, singing on the terraces, arches, and galleries. The sands were covered with the lotus ; the delicious stores in the houses, however much used, remained undi- minished ; musical instruments gave forth music by unseen fingers ; and gods and hermits hastened from all parts of the horison to await on Buddha. He descends, accompanied by hundreds of millions of divinities. The three thousand regions of the world are illuminated with an immense splendor, eclipsing that of the gods ; fear and suffering are banished ; every being is content, and has none but affection- ate thoughts. Hundreds of millions of gods bear up the car of Buddha. At the moment of his mortal birth, all the flowers open their cups ; young trees spring from the soil ; scented waters flow in all direc- tions ; young lions run to the palace from the moun- tain, unharmed and harmless ; five hundred young elephants, white as snow, come, and with their trunks touch the feet of the king, the father of Buddha ; the sons of the gods, adorned with girdles, appear in the apartment of the women, coming and going from either side ; the wives of the nagas, exposing half of their bodies, show themselves waving in the air ; ten thousand daughters of the gods, with fans of the peacock's tail in their hands, are seen against the blue of the sky ; ten thousand full urns appear, mak- ing the circuit of the great city of Kapila ; a hundred 30 Career of the God-Idea in History,. thousand daughters of the gods, with shells, drums, and tambourines about their necks, stand motionless ; all the winds hold their breath ; all the rivers and brooks stop their flow ; sun, moon, and stars cease to move ; a light of a hundred thousand colors, causing happiness in body and soul, is diffused abroad ; fire does not burn ; from the galleries, palace, terraces, gateways, arches, are suspended pearls and precious stones ; the crows, vultures, wolves, jackals, cease their cries ; none but sweet and soothing sounds are heard ; all the gods of the woods of Salas, thrusting their bodies half-way out from the foliage, show them- selves bending motionless ; parasols, great and small, are displayed in the air on every side. The queen, meantime, walks in the garden of Loumbini ; a tree bends, and salutes her ; the queen seizes a branch, and, looking graciously towards heaven, Buddha is- sues from her right side without wounding her ; a white lotus pierces the sod, to receive him ; a par- asol descends from heaven to cover him ; a river of cold and a river of hot water flow to him for a bath.* Such is the language of the sacred records of this incarnation of divinity. To us it may appear puerile ; but in humility let it be remembered a vast empire for immemorial time have bowed in implicit faith to his shrine, and, holding his earth-life as an ideal, make their best endeavors to actualize his devoted disinterestedness in themselves. * Lalitavistara, translated^ by M. Edward Foucaux, quoted by Renan, " Rel. Hist. Criticism." God-Idea of the Hindoos. 3 1 The fancies of uncultured youth have reveled in the field ; but there is bread-corn there, else it never would have satisfied, for so many generations, count- less swarms of people. It may not afford spiritual nourishment for us ; but, for its recipients, nothing can be better. How this incarnation was effected, and for what reason, is thus recorded : " It was at the close of the Dwapar Yug, that he who is omnipotent, and everlastingly to be contem- plated, the Supreme Being, the Eternal One, the Divinity worthy to be adored, appeared in this ocean of natural beings with a portion of his divine nature." Filled with compassion for the sufferings of man- kind, he took on himself the mortal garb, and sought to lead them into better paths. He took on himself infinite sufferings, that theirs might thereby be mit- igated. As whatever suffering one endures may be placed to the account of those he wishes, Buddha took terrible punishments on himself. So great was his sympathy, that he descended even into hell to teach the sufferers there. The Brahmans accuse him of atheism ; but he really taught their own doctrines of creation. Out of the original source of being, called by Buddhists the void, Brahma and the inferior creation were evolved ; and, after an immense interval of revolving ages, all things in the universe, even Brahma him- self, will be absorbed into the infinite void. At the age of seventy-nine years, Buddha Sakia's whole nature attained such complete absorption in the Di- 32 Career of the God-Idea in History. vine Being, that he ascended to celestial regions without the usual process of dying. " The Buddhists believe in one absolute existence, including both God and nature. When they speak of Providence, they mean an intelligence inherent in nature by which her movements are regulated. To avoid attaching any idea of form or limit to the ori- ginal Source of Being, the Buddhist calls him by a name signifying the void or space. They are, how- ever, divided on this subtile question into several schools. Some call this absolute existence the Su- preme Will, the Superior Intelligence. They suppose that he has alternate periods of activity and repose. When active, he creates, not from any will to do so, but from inherent laws of development. Thus ema- nate successive worlds, all changeable, illusory, unreal, destined finally to return again to the void. Spirit- ual existences are evolved in descending gradations down to man. Human beings may become so plunged in error and ignorance, as finally to lose all power of perceiving what is good and true. From this low condition they can never be raised without the aid of superior intellegences. The Supreme cannot descend to their relief, for he is incapable of motion or change ; but his first emanations, a high order of spiritual existences, change themselves with this mission of salvation. They descend to the inferior worlds, even down to the lowest hells, to give wretched creatures an example of virtue, explain the cause of their misery, and teach them how to attain supreme happiness." God-Idea of the Hindoos. 33 Their cosmology is evolution from void, and a resolution back again to void after a cycle of ages. Their ideas of nature are entirely anthromorphitic. The perfection of a world depends on the moral character of its inhabitants. In proportion as the beings of a world are saved, and ascend to superior worlds, that world disappears. Thus, after infinite ages, all return to the Supreme Essence, to re-appear in new successive emanations. All these ascending and descending movements have their source in laws of inherent necessity. Buddha has already been four times incarnated in the present world. His worshipers call him " The Saviour," and anxiously await his coming to restore the world to order and happiness. India, as well as Europe, has its school of Ration- alists. They deny the authority of the Vedas ; reject the doctrine that God is everywhere in nature ; main- taining, that, though nature is an emanation from God, she is entirely independent and distinct, con- taining within herself the laws and principles which regulate her phenomena. The body and spirit represent, finitely, such a dualism as God and nature represent infinitely ; and by withdrawing the senses from the external world, without help from the Vedas, a superior life of holi- ness can be attained, a union with the Supreme Soul be formed, and revelation of his will be obtained. The ultra school deny the existence of one Supreme, holding that there are many. All, how- ever, believe in the existence of a multitude of infe- 3 34 Career of the God-Idea in History. rior deities, but represent them as very inferior to human saints who have united themselves with the Supreme by a life of contemplation and virtue. In the extreme East, as well as the farthest West, among the oldest as well as the newest people, mind has been subject to the same law of growth, and passed through a similar cycle of change. The Hindoo stands before us with the concentrated beliefs of innumerable ages. Those remote times are the scaffoldings by which he has arrived at his present faith. They are impenetrable ; and we look upon the result as a whole, and ask, How avoid admitting its divine claims ? In this study, as in all others, analogy furnishes important clews. As the oak and the' acorn are connected by the series of trees of all stages of growth, from the germinating sprout to the giant tree, so the perfected doctrines are connected with the grossest superstitions by the intervention of savage races. Take any savage peo- ple, at random, and find what they believe ; and you have the belief of all other races at their stage of growth. The Hindoo theology began in the aspirations of the savage, and terminates in the extreme of Ration- alism. Its various stages of growth are plainly marked. It has followed a groove similar to that pursued in its progress by the Western mind. The mark of divine thought is manifested in its creeds ; but it is the divine and ever-advancing thought of man. We believe this, because it is a foreign system we are discussing. The Hindoo be- God-Idea of the Hindoos. 35 lieves the same of our theology : can we examine the latter with the same calm, unprejudiced spirit ? But how was evolved this intricate maze of wor- ship ? Very simply and inevitably, from the begin- ning. Old as is Hindoo civilization, it had a com- mencement ; and the ancestor of the believer in Brahm was a wild savage, believing in no god, but only terrified by fear at the irresistible power of the elements. This was his course of thought, the same for all races : He gave to everything a con- scious existence. Rocks, trees, mountains, lakes ; the winds, the waves ; whatever excited attention by beauty, loveliness, or deformity, were endowed with intelligence. The child repeats this phase of thought. The next step is the individualization of this intel- ligence. A host of invisible beings supply the mov- ing power to the visible world. Man ever regards nature as created for his especial use ; hence what- ever conflicts with his interests is evil, and whatever administers to his wants is good. Both these condi- tions exist in nature. There is good and evil : there must be good and bad invisible beings. There is a dualism in nature : there are two sources of power. By generalizing, there is a good and an evil deity. It is a long, long road, and one beset with pain, before the necessity of one supreme control is recog- nized. The advance is, however, made ; and Brahm, the Eternal One, unchanged amid all changes, serene amid obscurity, calm in the storm of the world, is grandly seen as the parental source of all being. 36 Career of the God-Idea in History. The steps in this magnificent ascent are clearly and deeply cut : the personification of invisible power ; the dualism personified by Brahma and Siva, with the mediation of Vishnu ; the incarnation of the good principle ; and, lastly, the unitizing of all phe- nomena in the eternal, immutable Brahm, the pri- mal source and termination, are way-marks of this progress. It is usual to begin to reason from the other side ; to commence with Brahm, and end with the lowest emanations of spirits : but nothing can be more opposed to the reality. To be able to grasp the idea of the Omnipotent One, necessitates ages of culture. It is the great idea to which all others are secondary. To suppose it to be first is like inferring that a child can comprehend a problem in the calculus before it can perform an operation in addition. There is growth, not from the great to the small, but from the small to the great. The Hindoos began with the forces of nature, and from the constitution of their own minds, by the slow growth of their mental powers, wrought out a theological system suited to their needs, just as they did their systems of science, art, and government. All bear the impress of the same master, and that impress is entirely human. II. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE EGYPTIANS, CHALDEANS, AND PERSIANS. THE first form of religious belief is nothing else but a horror of the unknown. . . . No natural religion appears to have been able to develop, from a germ within itself, anything whatever of real advantage to civilization. WAITZ, " ANTHROPOLOGIE." The universe is an harmonious whole, the soul of which is God. Numbers, figures, the stars, all nature indeed, are in unison with the mysteries of religion. KEPLER. r I "'HE geographical position of Egypt made it im- J- possible for its people to escape the influence of foreign religions. It was the gateway between Asia and Africa, and a vortex of nations. For ages it was a grand battle-ground, where contending races fought for supremacy. The original substratum on which was imposed the shepherd races is indetermi- nate in the night of countless centuries which gath- ers over the dim myths of history. The matured theology of Egypt resembled, in many essential points, that of India, of which it un- doubtedly was a branch. The paternal tree did not remain stationary, neither did the scion ; but, al- though both changed, the common characteristics were preserved. Both countries had a powerful hereditary priesthood, who held exclusive possession 38 Career of the God-Idea in History. of the sacred books, and all the learning extant in their time ; and were the judges, physicians, and as- tronomers. In both countries, society was divided into castes, the sacerdotal being the highest. The priests were allowed in both to marry, and neither tolerated female priests. Both held their rivers to be sacred ; that there was a reservoir of water above the firmament ; that there was a fifth element above our atmosphere called ether ; that the castes were successive emanations from one universal soul ; and that transmigration was the destiny of the soul. Their architecture was similar, copying the gloomy cavern, and taking the firmly based pyramid as a model. Their sacrifices were similar, and their as- tronomical systems nearly the same. The Hindoos exerted a great influence on Egyp- tian religion, as is thus seen. Egypt was originally governed by the gods, the last of whom was Osiris and his son Horus ; but, by gentle gradations, it descends from this sublime height to mortal kings. Osiris was the representative of the active and passive powers of nature. He was the fructifying power of the universe. The sun was his sacred em- blem, as was the Hindoo sign of reproduction, and a serpent emblematic of immortality. He was the " oldest son of Time, and courser of the day." While incarnated, he fulfilled a glorious mission, in- structing men how to cultivate and prepare the corn and the grape, and other secret arts of agriculture ; after which, through the regions of the dead, he as- Good and Evil. 39 cended to higher life, first overcoming the evil princi- ple. Henceforth he became judge of the dead, and ruler over the souls of good men. He was thus made the dispenser of immortal life. As the only deity who had become incarnated, he was more reverenced than all the eight higher gods. It was irreverent to utter his name. Herodotus speaks of him as " one whose name I am not at liberty to disclose." Ra represented the visible sun, and was wor- shiped with splendid ceremonials at Heliopolis. Troth, representing the moon, presided over learn- ing, and was the mediator between gods and men. The perplexing problem of the origin of good and evil was solved by the Egyptians by supposing Ty- pho, the God of Destruction, to be the twin brother of Osiris, the Creator. He was the god of darkness and eclipse ; the source of drought, disease, deluge, conflagration, and every malign influence affecting the happiness of man. He ruled the terrible, destruc- tive energies of the sea, the storm, the whirlwind. He was sculptured as a frightful monster, or sym- bolized by the ravaging hippopotamus. The most exalted goddess was Neith, who reigned inseparably with Amon in the sphere of ether. She was the mother of the gods, and the feminine origin of all things. Her especial province was wisdom, philosophy, military tactics, and morals. Her tem- ples at Sais exceeded in colossal grandeur any before seen, and her power was written on their walls in characters deciphered by Champollion : " I am all that has been, all that is, and all that 4O Career of the God-Idea in History. will be. No mortal has ever raised the veil that conceals me. My offspring is the sun." Isis was universally worshiped, and held in pecu- liar reverence. She was the universal passive prin- ciple of generation, as Osiris was the active. She was the recipient or mold of the life imparted. She was the origin of the form of all good, as Osiris was the soul. She was Nature, the prolific mother containing the germs of all life ; hence her symbol was an egg. Both she and Osiris were represented as bearing the Egyptian cross, emblem of life. The most beautiful representation pictures her nursing the infant Horus, son of Osiris. This is the holy family of Egypt, which the artists loved to depict. She is always by the side of that god in Amenti, when he presides as judge of the dead. She reigned with him on earth ; and, when she died, her soul was transferred to Sirius. As that star is accidentally connected by its risings with the inundations of the Nile, it was taken as the cause of that event, and received divine honors. The forces of nature were distributed among the innumerable host of inferior deities and spirits. The stars were animated with souls who took a deep interest in human affairs. Nilus presided over the Nile ; Canopus, over the waters ; Khan and the god- dess Ranno, over gardens and vineyards ; Anouke, over purity and household ties ; and every month, corresponding to the signs of the zodiac, had its at- tendant and ruling spirit. To every human being was awarded an attending spirit ; and, in a descend- Belief in Immortality. 41 ing scale, air, earth, water, stones, plants, and ani- mals, all had their attending genii, good or bad according to their qualities in reference to man. The masculine and feminine elements were a dualism of forces universally diffused. The presid- ing deities of every place formed a trinity. At Thebes, it was Amun, the creative wisdom ; Neith, the spiritual mother ; and a third, supposed to repre- sent the universe. At Philae, it was Osiris, the generating cause ; I sis, the receptive mold ; and Horus, the result. The future of man, in his relation to the gods, was similar to that taught by the Brahmans. After many transmigrations, completed in three thousand years, the soul would be absorbed into the Eternal Soul, and enter the original body it had left. Hence the care bestowed in embalming the dead, and the rev- erence in which their bodies were held. The belief in immortality is closely allied with that of a supreme being, and is of very ancient date. On a monument dating ages before Abraham is this epitaph : " May thy soul attain to the Creator of all mankind ! " The two beliefs growing out of the same faculties of the mind go hand in hand. Of the animal worship for which Egyptian my- thology has become famous, little need be said. The bull Apis was an object of veneration, and had tem- ples erected to him. The cat, alligator, and other animals, were also venerated in certain localities. Such worship awakens our mirth, as it called forth the satire of the Greeks and Romans, who might 42 Career of the God-Idea in History. better have directed their shafts against the absurdi- ties of their own beliefs. Our own mythology is not exempt from ridicule. All dogmas and beliefs grow out of the necessities of their times, are un- questioningly received, and satisfy an ardent want. We cannot sympathise with the worshipers of Apis ; but they were honest believers, and acted accord- ing to their highest knowledge. The sacred books of Hermes were as holy to the Egyptians as the Bible is to the most devout mod- ern Christian. The Pantheistic idea of the univer- sality of God made them abhor the shedding of blood ; and, from the symbolical representation of spiritual ideas by animal forms, their worship became degraded to idolizing the brutes themselves. The Egyptian mythology clearly indicates its der- ivation from grossest Fetichism by the hold that be- lief retained, even during the most splendid epoch of their civilization, and the tendency of the masses towards that simple form of expression of faith. In the light of her glory as the seat of learning, Egypt could boast of all grades of worship, from the ignorant rustic, bowing in abject devotion before a a leek or garlic, to the adoration of the sage for an abstract idea. The gulf dividing these extremes was greater even than at present. CHALDEA. It is interesting to learn the beliefs of these old races, almost concealed and lost in the night of Chaldea. 43 time ; for, by this means, we find that what we call new is only one of the countless forms of the old, which, like water, takes the form of the containing vessel. The world is ever a new world to the child, or the new race. We cannot, therefore, comprehend the new, unless we learn the past ; for it is the prod- uct of a germ deeply buried in the past, and its roots strike down through the interminable superimposed strata of past civilizations. By understanding the beliefs of contemporary peoples, we comprehend the doctrines of the Jews ; and, as the latter are the basis of Christianity, the subject is to us of vital interest. The Chaldeans were of the Semitic stock, and were impressed with the grand idea of Monotheism in common with their race. The vast plains and des- erts which formed their home, by the sameness of the scenes nature presented, re-acted on the minds of this singular people. With awe we exhume the grand sculptured cities of their creation, whose age ante- dates the chronology of history, and idly conjecture of the builders. What little is known of them can be briefly stated. They believed in one supreme being, from whom, by successive emanations, a multitude of subordinate deities were evolved. The human soul was a portion of this supreme, and originally had wings, which must be reproduced before it can return to its source. This idea came from received notions of a better past, lost by the spirit coming to earth, connected with a childish longing for the swift wings of a bird, which seemed most desirable, and, if gained, would 44 Career of the God-Idea in History. enable the spirit to wing its way through the ether to its original happy home. The world was created in six successive periods. Whenever all the planets meet in the sign of Capricorn, the whole earth is overwhelmed by a deluge of water ; and, whenever they all meet in Cancer, it is consumed by fire. In this statement is discernible the rude outline of what was afterwards worked into the Jewish cosmogony, the six days of creation, the deluge, and final destruc- tion by fire. A shepherd race, wandering over the deserts, above which spreads an almost cloudless sky, through which the stars glow with uninterrupted splendor, they early observed the stars, and at length came to regard them as disembodied spirits, and to worship them. What object in the entire range of startling phe- nomena presented by nature is as astonishing as the rising of the sun ? The breaking light wakes all nature from slumber, and infuses life and joy. It is the fountain of life, from which flows all activity, and seems the most worthy object of worship in creation. The orb of night is second only in position, and is closely followed by the planets wandering through the sky, yet ever returning. All of these commanded and received adoration. The highest deity was Baal, prince of the heavenly luminaries. The Egyptian emblem of a winged circle, or Sun, was his symbol, and on his altar animals and probably human beings were sacrificed. The magnificent temple erected by Semiramis Persia. 45 contained three golden statues, one of Baal; one supposed to be the Goddess of Nature ; and one the goddess representing the planet Venus, who presided over generation. The Goddess of Nature, the recipient and pre- server of the life principle of the world, sat in a golden chair, with two lions by her side, and two huge serpents at her feet. The forehead of the other goddess was surmounted by a star : in her right hand she held a serpent ; in her left, a sceptre adorned with gems. By such symbols did the souls of the old Chaldeans strive to embody their inchoate and inex- pressible conceptions of the Divine. . PERSIA. History furnishes many examples where one man, emerging from obscurity, has suddenly elevated his people to the broad platform of the world's activities. Among these great minds, that shine athwart the ages like beacons from some Eddystone light, few were as Celebrated in antiquity, yet so little known in the present, as Zoroaster, the saviour of the Per- sians. His doctrines slaked the thirst of many ancient philosophers, created schisms in the ranks of early Christianity, and present, in many respects, unsolved problems to the learned. The period fixed for his advent varies by thousands of years, some authors stating it at five thousand years before the Trojan war, or six thousand before 46 Career of the God-Idea in History. the Christian era;* while others maintain that he flourished only fifteen hundred years before that epoch, f The solution of this contradiction is found by some scholars, by supposing that there were two personages of that name, one very ancient, and an- other who must have lived before the commencement of the Median Empire, or at least eight centuries before Christ. \ The advent of this God-man- is enshrined by a halo of myths. His mother was alarmed in dreams that evil spirits sought to destroy the unborn babe, but was assured by a good spirit, who said to her, " Fear nothing. Osmuzd will protect this infant. He has sent him as a prophet to the people. The world is waiting for him." In early life he retired to a solitary mountain to attain holiness. One day fire descended from heaven on this mountain, and the King of Persia approached to worship, when Zoroaster came down out of the flame, bringing with him a book of laws, revealed by Ormuzd himself. This book is the Zendavesta, or living word. It is believed to be a part of the pri- meval word by which creation was produced, and that every syllable possesses inherent virtue. If the priests fail to perform the ritual, or recite the pre- scribed prayers, it is supposed the order of the universe will be disturbed, and all things fall into confusion. Of his death, it is said that he invoked the spirit of * Aristotle, Pliny, Plato. f Plutarch. J Heeren. Advent of Zoroaster. 47 the constellation Orion, and ascended on a thunder- bolt. This belief existed long before the advent of Moses, and it is easy .to discern the parts which were taken to build the fables of the Pentateuch. Zoroaster looked through the confusion of phenom- ena, and sought to find the unitizing power in one supreme essence, invisible, incomprehensible, named Zeruane Akerene, or Unlimited Time, Eternity. From him sprang Primeval Light, which gave birth to Ormuzd, the King of Light. He is the "All-See- ing," the "Just Judge," the " Sovereign Intelligence." He pronounced the primeval word, and his own abode of light sprang into existence. He then cre- ted six resplendent spirits or holy ones, of whom he was the seventh, or highest. The deities of Benev- olence and Wisdom stand by his throne, and bear to him the prayers of inferior spirits and of men. He then created twenty-eight inferior spirits to pre- side over the sun, moon, and stars ; and, while they protect mankind from evil influences, they serve as messengers between them and the superior spirits. The third order of spirits are more numerous, and are personifications of the idea of Ormuzd before the creation of the world. Hence they are the archetypes of everything which exists, the vivifying principle of nature. Every mortal as well as spirit, even Ormuzd himself, has one of these attending spirits. Khor, the sun, was called the eye of Ormuzd, and was an object of universal adoration. The universe 48 Career of the God-Idea in History. was thus intrusted to a chain of spiritual beings, ascending from man to Ormuzd. Minerals, plants, insects, earth, water, air, fire, the months, and the days of the month, all had presiding spirits. The spirits of the stars were benevolent guardians of man and infirm creatures, and were endowed with intelligence superior to the spirits of the earth. They foreknew the events of the future, and saw whatever was occurring or going to occur in the universe. The destinies of men were intimately connected with their motions ; and the Persians held them in such affectionate reverence, that, whenever they looked at them, they devoutly kissed their hand. To account for good and evil mingled in nature, and avoid the seeming inconsistency of referring both to one source, was the great problem, or rather mystery, of the ancient world. In reality, it is no problem at all ; but to a people who have not ad- vanced to the understanding that nature is controlled by unchangeable laws, that evil and good are alike results of law, and have only relative relation as affecting man, they appear in absolute antagonism. The Egyptians solved the mystery by supposing the Destructive and Beneficent Principles were twin brothers. The Persians satisfied themselves by say- ing Ormuzd, the King of Light, was the first ema- nation from the Eternal One ; and Arimanes, the Prince of Darkness, was the second. Arimanes becoming jealous, the Eternal One condemned him for three thousand years to the dark realm of shad- Creation of the Devs. 49 ows, during which time Ormuzd created the firma- ment with its orbs of light. When the period of his punishment expired, Arimanes approached the light, and its dazzling beauty renewed his jealousy. He set himself at counteracting the works of the Benefi- cent. He created seven archdevs, and attached them to the planets, to paralyze the works of the good spirits, and substitute evil. He then created twenty- eight devs, to spread all species of disease and distress ; after which he made a multitude of genii, that every object might have an evil as well as good spirit. Ormuzd saw the disastrous results, and, in his beneficent thought, sought to arrest the increase of evil by the creation of an egg containing kindly spirits : but Arimanes created another, containing evil spirits ; and then, to make the confusion com- plete and irreparable, he broke the two together. " The cosmogony of the Zend is nearly the same as that revealed to the writers of the Bible at an indefinitely later period. " Ormuzd created the material world in six succes- sive periods. He first spread out the firmament with its orbs of light ; second, he created the water ; third, the earth ; fourth, trees ; fifth, animals ; sixth, man. When all was finished, he devoted a seventh period to festivities with the good spirits. Arimanes as- sisted in the creation of the earth and water. Or- muzd, by his will, created a bull, the symbol of all life upon the earth. Arimanes slew him ; but drops of his blood, falling on the ground, afterwards pro- 50 Career of the God-Idea in History. duced various plants and animals. When the ele- mentary particles of his body had been purified in the light of the sun forty years, they became the germ of the Ribas tree, consisting of two closely entwined stems. Into these Ormuzd infused the truth of life ; and they became the first man and woman, named Meshia and Meshiane." This pair were created in perfect purity ; but were seduced by the evil spirits, and discord and death were introduced into the world. The duration of time is fixed by the Eternal One at twelve thousand years. During the later times, Arimanes, notwithstanding the activity of the good spirits, will gain the ascendency ; and the pure in heart have nothing to fear, for the Eternal has de- creed the ultimate triumph of good. At the end of time, a star with a tail will strike the earth, and set it on fire. The fierce heat will cause the metals to run down the mountains, and flow in rivers. All men are compelled to pass through these. The good will experience only pleasure, but the bad will suffer indescribable anguish. All however, even the incor- rigible Arimanes, come out purified, and join in a universal chorus of praise to the eternal source of all blessings. On that day the Holy One judges the world, each one according to his works ; after which the new earth will be a source of indescribable beauty, and inno- cence and happiness everywhere prevail. Fire, as the ethereal emblem of the orbs of the sky, and especially of the sun, was worshiped with Persian Sacrifices. 51 peculiar reverence. It was considered the most purifying of all things. No dead bodies were allowed to be burned ; and to cast dirt into the sacred fire, or to blow it with the breath, was punished with death. The identical fire received by Zoroaster from Or- muzd was said to be preserved, and was sustained by aromatic oils and wood, and was carried in front of the army by the priests when they went out to bat- tle. The Persians sacrificed vegetables, fruits, and flow- ers. Human beings were buried alive as an offering to a subterranean deity. To Mithras, the Mediator, they sacrificed beautiful white horses. In early times, worship was always performed in the open air, it be- ing considered irreverent to confine the Deity within walls ; but in after times temples were erected, and numerous oratories, where the sacred fire was kept burning for the people to go in and pray. In these Persian and Chaldean myths, we discern the source of what may be called the substratum of Christian beliefs. It is usual for divines to escape this conclusion by reversing the table, and supposing the laws were the original, and every other belief in the world to be derived from them. This is very convenient when a certain infallible creed is to be sustained, but it is neither the philosophical nor true method. Chronology gives the Zoroasterian doc- trines the precedence ; and, if the Jewish agree with them, it proves their derivation. It would be strange indeed, if a neighboring people, brought in contact by the arts of peace, and for centuries amalgamated 52 Career of the God-Idea in History. by the influence of conquest, scattered, as the Bible says, over the whole Persian Empire, should not ab- sorb some, at least, of the ideas of their conquerors. An examination of their beliefs will show the subject in clearer light, and strengthen the conclusion of the human source of the Hebrew myths. III. THE GOD- IDE A OF THE JEWS. THE words translated " God," " Devil," etc., in the various dialects of sav- ages, simply mean the manifestations of the unseen world, and have no relation to personal being. Two things are necessary to render religion possible, namely, a religious faculty in man ; and God out of man, as an object of that religious fac- ulty. THEODORE PARKER. IT is assumed by popular theology, and advocated by noted critics, and generally received, that the Jewish nation was selected by the Almighty to car- ry down to later ages the knowledge of the one true God. The entire Semitic race is thought to be mon- otheistic, and to have enacted an important part in the history of the world by introducing this other- wise foreign element. Paley, Milman, and Renan, speak glowingly of the pure monotheism of the Jew, contrasted with the polytheism of surrounding nations. Only the dust which gathers over theological glasses could so ob- scure men's minds, otherwise clear, to the truth. The Jews at the beginning were not monotheists, nor did they ever obtain the conceptions of divinity revealed by the philosophers of Greece. Their his- tory reveals the fact, traced in that of all nations, of 54 Career of the God-Idea in History. a gradual progress from fetichism to a grand concep- tion of one Almighty Power. The individual first sets up a god, which becomes a god of his family ; and, when the family enlarges into a tribe or nation, the family penates becomes the national deity, and from thence ascends to the position of the God of the universe. It is expressly said that the father and grandfather of Abraham worshiped other gods ; and Abraham himself was doubtless taught the planetary worship of the Chaldeans, and accustomed to pay devotion to images. In the entire course of Abrahamic history, his God is represented as acting so meanly and des- picably, that it is difficult to avoid concluding that he is anything more than the reflection of the mind of his devotee. God sits at the door of Abraham's tent ; partakes of a repast ; is angry because Sarah laughs ; and, after discussing the case of Sodom and Gomorrah, says he is going down there, to prove the reports that have reached him. The expression " Jehovah Elohim, the God of gods," indicates the Jewish beliefs in other gods. When Jacob stole Laban's gods, the latter pursued him. Then Jacob made a condition on which he select- ed Jehovah for his God : he made him a confidant in his trickery, and wrestles and extorts by main force a blessing. Out of a host of deities, Abraham selects one, and promises obedience to that one. When his tribe mul- tiplies, his individual god becomes a national deity. In the hands of Moses, educated in the sacred Egyp- Abrahamic Legends. 55 tian mysteries, this god improves in character, and the national worship becomes more monotheistic. But all Moses claimed for his God was superiority. " Who is like unto thee, Jehovah, among the gods ? " He writes in the commandments, " Thou shalt have no other gods beside (or before) me." Joshua does not represent the desertion of Jehovah as atheism, but simply as ingratitude. With all the energy displayed by their intrepid leader, they, however, constantly relapsed into idol- atry. With the advance of culture, the same difference between the God of the educated and ignorant man, as seen in Greece, occurs. One is an intangible spirit, the other an enlarged man. Of the ideas of the rude patriarchs concerning Deity, little is known. Abraham seems to have obtained a glimpse of the eternal power of creation, and to have believed that all the deities of surround- ing peoples were only subordinate beings. By pay- ing devotion directly to the Supreme, and thus be- coming his chosen people, they at once became exalted above all other nations. Wise and sagacious as Abraham is said to have been, he still retained the traditions of his education. He held to the popu- lar belief in the sacredness of groves, and planted one "at Beersheba." Wherever he sojourned, he erected an altar, and sacrificed to the Lord. He even was imbued with the notion, universal among the ancients, that human sacrifice was acceptable to the gods, and so nearly consummated that of his son Isaac. 56 Career of the God-Idea in History. The sale of Joseph by his brethern first brought the nomadic Jews in historic contact with Egypt, then the bright focus of all the world. During a residence of four hundred years, they must have ac- quired many of the names, customs, and myths of that people. Joseph married a daughter of a priest of On, and was skilled in magic. When he died, his body was embalmed. Moses is said to have been " learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians." As the adopted son of the king, he was allowed free access to the sacred knowledge of the priests, and was initiated into the Great Mysteries, where he learned the most secret doctrines of the Sacerdotal Order. From the fitful glances of fragmentary his- tory, we learn that those mysteries taught the exis- tence of one Invisible, all-powerful God, whose attributes were symbolized by the numerous deities worshiped by different nations. This ALL Moses adopted as his particular guardian and friend. In this he was sanctioned by the long series of patriar- chal teachings. But, exalted as was this conception, the ritual he prescribed bore a strong resemblance to its Egyptian model. He called his God " Jehovah," a word containing the past, present, and future tenses of the Hebrew word " to be," signifying " I was, am, and will be." This strikingly resembles an inscription on a very ancient Egyptian temple, "I am what- ever is, was, and will be." The names of Egyptian deities were never expressed in the popular language, and in the sacred dialect were not pronounced as written. The same reverence for the name of their The Tabernacle and Ark. 57 deity is felt by the Hindoo. The Jews followed the example of their Egyptian masters in their rever- ence for the name "J enova h/' expressing it by a short mark which they read " Lord." The priestly judges of Egypt always wore a breastplate ornamented with jewels ; and this breastplate, set with the Urim and Thmmim, was retained by Moses. The tabernacle was a copy of the Egyptian temple, with its tank of water, its holy of holies, veiled from vulgar gaze. In the innermost sanctuary of the temple was a chest, or shrine, on which was placed a sacred image, overshadowed by creatures with wings, transposed into Hebrew mythology as cheru- bim. Scholars have arrived at the conclusion, after much discussion, that these cherubim were similar to the winged bulls so common in Chaldean and Egyptian sculptures. The ark had rings, through which poles were slipped, that it might be carried on the shoulders of priests. The Egyptian priests are represented in the sculptures as carrying shrines in the same manner. The anointing of kings and priests with sacred oil was an Egyptian custom, as was the lineal descent of the high-priesthood, the setting-apart of lands, the wearing of pure white linen at certain sacrifices, and the festival to welcome the new moon. Their offer- ings to their gods were precisely like those prescribed by Moses. They believed that burnt offerings were a grateful savor to the gods. The scape-goat, and purification by the ashes of a red heifer, were pecu- 58 Career of the God-Idea in History. liar Egyptian observances imitated by Moses. From time immemorial, traveling parties in Hindostan carry with them a pole with the image of a serpent wreathed around it. The Egyptians connected the serpent with the healing art. The emblem of the Greek god of medicine was a serpent wreathed around a staff. Moses made a serpent of brass, and placed it on a pole ; " and it came to pass, that, if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass he lived." The Egyptians abhored swine, and considered them unclean above all food : if a priest touched one accidentally, he went through the ceremonies of puri- fication. Moses commanded the Israelites not to eat nor touch the flesh or carcass, and prescribes ceremonies of purification should this be done. Circumcision was a peculiar Egyptian rite, and at the time of Moses was considered by them to be of more importance than by the Hebrews. The destruction of Egyptian records severs Hebrew theology from that of the Nile ; but these fragments show how intimately they were interwoven. Moses made a great step in advance. He erected a priestly caste. His whole nation became a holy people. The sacred mysteries of religion were freely divulged to all, at least the concealed portion was reduced to a minimum, and the invisible God was worshiped without the intervention of images. This God dwelt in the midst of the people, sustaining, overwatching, rewarding, and punishing them. The prevalent idea of masculine and feminine deities he discarded, and, Chaldean Gods. 59 with it, the impurities of popular mythology. But we must speak gratifiedly of the purity of his ideas of God. If removed from the passion of love, he was not from those of hate, jealousy, and revenge. He is changeable, and can be conciliated. His charac- ter is that of the Jew, intensified. As the gods of Greece were embodiments of the ardent imagination of the Greeks, Jehovah assimilated the iron complex- ion of the Hebrew. He commands them to smite surrounding nations, and spare not ; to kill the men, and take the women for themselves ; and enjoy the " vineyards they had not planted, and harvests they had not saved." The patriarchs were on most familiar terms with God. They often saw him and talked with him. He wrote the Ten Commandments on a tablet of. stone, and enters into the minutest details of rules and ob- servances, even to the fringe on the priest's garments ; yet they constantly reverted to idolatry, or the wor- ship of other gods. Aaron erected an altar to a golden calf, which they worshiped, in imitation of the Egyptian Apis ; and in the next generation, after making the most binding compact with Jehovah, they fell into the worship of the Chaldean gods of the sun and moon. Restored by Gideon, the true worship was again deserted at his death for Baal-Berith. When the Hebrews dwelt in tents, a tent served for their God : but, when the king built a house for himself, it occurred to him that his God ought not to dwell less honorably ; and this idea, broached by 60 Career of the God-Idea in History. David, was fully carried out by Solomon in the tem- ple that Sacred Writ has made famous. The idea was similar to that of the surrounding nations, all of whom had temples, many far surpassing in size and splendor that of Solomon. It was not in accordance with Jewish policy to multiply their temples. The one God must have one temple, to which the nations must come, around which it must gather, and far from which it could not expand. Their God was wholly exclusive. The Mosaic religion was for a tribe, a small nation circumscribed in its territory. In their most depressed state, the Jews asserted their lofty and exclusive claims as the only chosen people of God. They sought not to convert, but to repel. Adopted by a single family on the plains of Chaldea, when that family became as the sands of the sea- shore, he still maintained his supreme place. In what may be called the vulgar rendering of the great cardinal principles, the Hebrews were as lost, and conjectured as childishly, as any of their despised neighbors. They adopted the prevailing idea of subordinate spirits, employed by God as mediums of communication with man. Their most ancient name for God, " Elohim," means " more than one ; " and God is represented by a plural pronoun in the Bible, as, " Let us make man after our image ; " " Man is become as one of us." The Hindoo sacred books describe the grand, beautiful " spirits of singing stars," who rejoice together when a good deed is accomplished. Their counter part is found in Job, who says, " When the The Cabala. 61 foundations of the earth were fastened, and the corner-stone thereof was laid, the [spirits of the] morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy." The captivity in Babylon exerted a marked influ- ence on the Jews. Previously they believed in the existence of evil spirits, but not until then did they form a conception of a great rebellious spirit in oppo- sition to God. They then transplanted the Persian Arimanes into their mythology. Daniel considered Michael the protecting spirit of the Jews ; thereby showing, that, like all the surrounding nations, he believed each people had a guardian spirit. Tobit borrows the Persian Amshaspands, and alludes to their office when he causes Raphael to say, " I am one of the seven holy angels which present the prayers of the saints, and go in and out before the holy one." The Cabala embodies the traditions which through the passing ages attached themselves to the Mosaic writings, and may be called the mythological part of Hebrew theology. According to it, God was pure uncreated light, existing by necessity of his nature, filling all space, and having inherent life and motion. He was the infinite, of whose ideas beings were rep- resentatives, and in whom they always existed. Wisdom was the feminine infinite ; and from the two sprang the first Adam, the " express image of God." From the latter was evolved ten spirits and four worlds, the lowest of which is the earth. Planets and stars are animated by spirits, who were inter- ested in the affairs of men, could communicate with 62 Career of the God-Idea in History them, and prophesy. One of the most conspicuous of them was Netraton the Mediator, who recorded the good deeds of men. There were lower orders of spirits, the evil ones, whose chief was Belial. They constantly sought to destroy the labor of the good. God was thus removed by the interposition of spirit- ual agencies from matter, and man became the end and care of creative energy. So great was the veneration of the Jews for their sacred writings, that they did not allow the book of the law to be written on parchment made from the skin of any unclean- animal, or prepared by any one but an Israelite. When copied, not a word must be written from memory, and every word must be pro- nounced before written. Before they wrote the name of Deity, they always washed the pen. Before they touched the book, they washed their hands, and not then unless it was first covered. The value of the Jewish belief is estimated in a masterly manner by De Wette. They never reached a high degree of culture, not even as high as sur- rounding nations. Their literature was entirely in the hands of the priests, and essentially theocratico- mythological. They set out with the idea that God miraculously interposed in the affairs of men, and thus unitized all their writings by this theocratic o- religious pragmatism. " Thus saith the Lord," makes the Old Testament a history of God. Its miracles have their origin in ignorance, and in the distance of time between the events and their narrative. IV THE GOD-IDEA OF THE ARABIANS. WILL our line reach to the bottom of God ? There is nothing on earth or in heaven to which we can compare him : of course we can have no im- age of him in the mind. THEODORE PARKER. THE Arabians are a branch of the Semitic stock ; and, as theology partakes decidedly of the char- acters of race, their conceptions of Deity resemble those of their near relatives, the Jews. Previous to Mohammed, they were worshipers of the stars, angels, and their images ; which they hon- ored as inferior deities, and mediators between man and the supreme God. They acknowledged one Creator and Lord of the Universe, Allah Taala, the Most High God, to whom all other deities were sub- ordinate. These inferiors were called Dahat, the goddesses ; and the Greeks, according to their usual custom of resolving the religions of all countries into their own, stated that the Arabs worshiped but two deities, Orotalt and Alilat, names synonymous with Bacchus and Urania.* The veneration of the Arabs for the stars natu- rally gave rise to the pre-eminence of the latter di- vinity. The prayers they usually addressed to the * Koran. Sale. Pre. Discourse. 64 Career of the God-Idea in History. Supreme ran thus : " I dedicate myself to thy ser- vice, O God ! Thou hast no companion, except thy companion of whom, thou art absolute master, and of whatever is his." When they sacrificed, however, they divided their offerings between the supreme and the inferior deities, the Koran upbraiding them for giving the most and best to the latter. This is com- mon to all mankind, for the Infinite Creator is too far removed from humanity to awaken more than a cold and vague appreciation. They erected seven temples to the seven planets, each tribe having some special deities. Several of these were typified by large rude stones. Some believed neither in creation past, nor resurrection to come. They referred the origin of things to nature, and their dissolution to age. Others received both ; among whom were those who had their camel tied to their sepulchre, and allowed to perish, that they might not be obliged to go on foot. Some believed in metempsychosis ; and, from the blood of the brain of the dead, a bird was found called Hamah, which once in a hundred years visited the sepulchre ; though others say that the bird is animated by the soul of the person unjustly slain, and constantly cries, " Give me to drink," meaning the murderer's blood, until his death is avenged, when it flies away. The stars shining through the clear atmosphere of the desert, by their corresponding appearance with certain expected events, naturally evoked devotion. The Arabs were early acquainted with the magi, and were not loath to receive portions of their religion. God-Idea of Arabia. 65 The Hamyarites were devoted to the sun, and had a temple at Aden, where the enthusiasm of the devo- tee could be kindled by seeing from the rocky pre- cipice the glorious luminary rising like an orb of fire from the bosom of the Indian Ocean.* The moon, the dog-star, the planets, all were held by certain tribes as special deities, and their religious festivities were fixed by terms of the equinox and solstice. The stars were dispensers of the weather, and in- habited by angelic beings intermediate between man and the supreme God. Hence the divine honors to propitiate their favor. Of these siderial divinities, the Koran mentions three who were worshiped under female names, Al Lattah, Al Uzzah, and Manah. The great tribes of Arabia were divided in the worship of these. Manah was represented by a rough block of stone, of a black color, fixed on a golden pedestal. The Koran spe- cifies five other deities, Wadd, worshiped under the human figure by the tribe of Kelb ; Sawah, a female deity adored by the tribe of Hamadan ; Yauk, bear- ing resemblance to a horse ; Masr, that of an eagle ; and Yaghuth, a popular deity of Yemen, that of a lion. Hobal was a famous deity whose statue was brought from Belka in Syria. It was the image of a man cut from red agate, and placed on the top of the Kaaba near those of Abraham and Ishmael. Having by accident lost the hand which held the divining arrows, the lost member was supplied by one of gold. He was surrounded by three hundred and sixty infe- * Hist. Arabia. Harper & Brothers. Vol. i., p. 19. 5 66 Career of the God-Idea in History. rior deities, and thus the devout of Mecca were en- abled to worship a new divinity every day in the year. The Hanifites worshiped a lump of dough for a god, and only ate it in cases of extreme famine. Like the Greeks and Romans, the Arabians had household gods who received their last adieux when they went abroad, and their first salutation when they returned, after whom they named their chil- dren, and gloried in being counted servants and vo- taries.* On the altar of these gods victims were sacrificed, and some were stained with human gore, f From this gross fetichism the Arabians were ele- vated by the teachings of their great prophet. The book he left them has served them for a sacred and infallible oracle. The Koran was neither written consecutively, nor did it slowly mature from a vague and indeterminate text : it is rather a complication of Mohammed preach- ing, bearing the impress of his daily thoughts and necessities. The daily recitations were written down by his disciples on skins, the shoulder-blades of sheep, or polished stones ; or preserved in their memory by his principal followers, who were called bearers of the Koran. Not till the Caliphate of Abou Bekr were these fragments joined together. There can be no dispute that the compilation was made in good faith, and with strict honesty of purpose. No attempt at reconciliation was made. The longest * Sale. Pre. Dis. Selden de Diis Syriis. \ Porphyry. The Prophet Mohammed. 67 chapters were placed first, and the shortest at the end. A second revisal was made under the Caliphate of Othman. Some changes in spelling were made ; the text fixed according to the dialect of Mecca ; and then, to prevent farther discussion, all the other cop- ies were collected and burned. The book is thus presented as a record of the sayings of the prophet, and by its glaring contradictions conclusively proves that it has not met with any important change. Mohammed is a subject of history. His advent was so recent that his origin has not been lost in myths. The Arab is free from paying divine honors to man, and hence delights in the human side of his proph- et's character. Nothing is concealed. His infirmi- ties and humiliations are unflinchingly recorded. He begins life as a commission merchant. Could the mythic personages of the past be brought under the same blaze of historic light, how rapidly would with- er the grand fables by which they are enshrined ! Of his morality, the severe rules of a European must not be applied to a child of the desert. He was up- right, just, and honest, par excellence, according to the Arabian standard. Whatever may be the opinion of his character and mission, it cannot be disputed that his religious system is a great advance on that of ancient times. It was such an advance as Christi- anity made on paganism, and equally great. It was made in the only direction the Arabians were capa- ble of going. The Koran breathes the loftiest conceptions of the 68 Career of the God-Idea in History. supreme Deity. God brings forth the living out of the dead, and the dead out of the living. All things in heaven and on earth are subject to him. He justly challenges the most exalted comparison. He is the Mighty and the Wise.* He sends the winds, and raises the clouds, and spreads them over the heavens as pleases him. " It is God who created you in weakness, and after weakness has given you strength ; and after strength he will reduce you to weakness and gray hairs : he createth that which he pleaseth, and he is the wise and the powerful, f He is a witness over all things, and knows whatsoever occurs in heaven or earth. He forms the unseen party to the most private discourse. " He is the first and the last ; the manifest and the hidden. It is he who created the heavens and the earth in six days, and then ascended to his throne He is with you wherever you be He is the kingdom of the heavens and the earth, and unto God shall all things return. He causeth the night to succeed the day, and he causeth the day to succeed the night ; and he knows the innermost part of men's hearts.":}: He knoweth the past and the future. His goodness is boundless, and his wrath terrible. His mercy is unlimited. His words, laws, and sentences, unutter- able. He is the only giver of victory. " God is one God : he begetteth not, neither is he begotten ; and there is not any one like unto him." * Koran, p. 334. % Ib. p. 438. f Sale's Koran, p. 332. Koran, chap. 112. The God of the Arab. 69 Such was the sublime utterance of the great prophet, the speech of a wonderful people, who gave voice to the wild solitude of the desert, and saw, in the monotony of surrounding nature, the reflection of the ONE God. V. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE GREEKS AND ROMANS. DIEU est plus quo la totale existence, il est eu meme temps 1'absolu. II est 1'ordre oil les math^matiques, la m&aphysique, la logique sont vraies : il est le lieu de l'idal, le principe vivant du bien, du beau, et du vrai. Envisag6 de la sorte, Dieu est pleinement et sans reserve ; il est et&iiel et immuable, sans progres ni devenir. RENAN. You shall come to the knowledge of God when you show yourself worthy of it. POTHINUS, Bishop of Lyons. GAY, imaginative, plastic, the Grecians seized the mythologies of surrounding races, and, out of all, wove a pattern, fascinatingly beautiful, and full of golden threads. Their ceremonies and rites were thus an aggregation of fragments. They had no sacred books, though Minos received his laws direct from Jupiter. Their early poets fur- nished a substitute. Homer and Hesiod fixed their theology. The dreams of poets and the embellish- ments of fancy became sound orthodoxy. Hesiod has beautifully expressed the aspirations of the hu- man heart for happiness ; and, not finding it in the present, looked to the remote past, to the Garden of Eden, for the golden age. Then men lived like gods ; and there were neither passions, vices, vexation, nor toil. Then all were happy in companionship with divine beings. The earth was beautiful, and spon- The Brazen Age. 71 taneously yielded an abundant harvest. Man was afflicted with none of the infirmities of age ; and, when called to a higher sphere, he simply slumbered. Then followed the silver age, when men's lives were shortened because of their neglect of the gods, and injustice towards each other. Then came the brazen of turbulence and insin- cerity. The present is the iron age, still more de- generate, the Cali Yug of the Hindoo, when the life of man is shortened to a span, and all manner of crimes, violence, fraud, and disease, everywhere abound. Homer assigns similar attributes to the gods as Hesiod. They are actuated by human de- sires, passions, and motives, and are admirable far more for superior power than moral excellence. In their system, a direct supernatural agency guides and controls all things, from the greatest to the smallest. Every thought of the poet and philosopher was received by inspiration : even to laugh was to become subject to the influence of a god. Between gods and men there was a living intercourse. They often vis- ited cities disguised as travelers. Gods from other countries were constantly being adopted into the Greek Pantheon. All their deities bear traces of a foreign origin, and the stories told of them are the mixed legends of various nations. They adopted the seven planetary spirits of the Egyptians and Hindoos, Apollo the sun, Diana the moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, Mercury, and Venus, and consecrated suc- cessive days to them. The seventh day was sacred 72 Career of the God-Idea in History. to Saturn from time immemorial : Hesiod and Homer call it the holy day. Zeus, or Jupiter, was differently represented' at different periods. As the supreme god, his aspect varies with the foreign elements introduced. He- siod and Homer describe him as the supreme creator of heaven, earth, and sea ; the father of the gods and men ; omnipotent to all except the unchanging de- crees of the Fates. He never appears on the stage of human affairs, being so exalted that there must be a mediator between him and man. The transpo- sition of Indra from the Hindoo to the Greek Pan- theon is indicated by the conception of Jupiter as the son of Ether, armed with a thunderbolt, sur- rounded by the moon and stars. He is in this con- ception married to his sister Juno, who represents the air, and had Iris, the rainbow, for an attendant. Minerva was goddess of wisdom, presiding over the sciences, arts, poetry, and philosophy. Bacchus was god of wine and the vintage. Ceres was the goddess of the harvest ; Mercury, of orators and thieves ; Pan, of generation ; Venus, goddess of beauty and pleasure ; Cupid, god of love. Apollo was the central figure in Grecian mythology, and was adored as the god of light, eloquence, medi- cine, and prophecy. The theology of Greece and Rome was a vast accu- mulation, which it is tedious to explore, and foreign to our purpose. It is replete with vague strivings and wandering flights of the imagination, like the crude conjecturings of children ; the essence of the Doctrines of Orpheus. 73 poetry of Nature. To those antique men, Nature was a living, thinking, acting being, and they were children prattling at her breast. We can amuse ourselves by unraveling the web of fable, but let us not treat lightly what to them was purest truth. The popular theology was only the external garb. The philosophers passed through it, and sought the deep, underlying principles of nature. To them we turn for the solution of the grand problem of creation. Perhaps they make a final and conclusive statement; perhaps only what, at best, are personal opinions. The earliest of the Grecian teachers was Orpheus, who flourished about 1200 B. C. He taught that there was one invisible God, who contained within himself the germ of all things, and was alternately active and passive. In his active state, successive grades of beings emanated from him by inherent necessity, all of whom in different degrees partook of his divine nature, and ultimately returned to him. The universe would be destroyed by fire, and re- newed. " The empyrean, the deep tartarus, the earth, the ocean, the immortal gods and goddesses, all that is, all that has been, and all that will be, was originally contained in the fruitful bosom of Zeus. He is the first and the last, the beginning and the end. All beings derive their origin from him. There is only one power, one only Lord, one universal king." Thales taught about 636 B. C. He is justly con- 74 Career of the God-Idea in History. sidered as the father of Greek speculation. Only fragments of his doctrines remain, but enough to show that from them was woven the variegated and splendid web of Hellenic philosophy. He said, " The principle of all things is water." This proposition will undoubtedly bring a smile by its apparent absurdity, but it probably possessed a deep meaning to him. He strove to find the primary substance, the one principle from which all things are evolved. He saw with his penetrating glance that existences are but modes, and that these modes undergo constant transformations. Beneath all this fluctuating external, he sought an unchanging in- ternal power. Water is the most universal ele- ment. It fills the earth, seems generated in the at- mosphere, and life itself appears to be the direct product of moisture and warmth. Hence he, mis- guided by appearance, maintained that water was the beginning of all things. Cicero has no right to interpret this proposition by supposing Thales " held water to be the beginning of things, but that God was the mind which created things out of water." Such an interpretation is the growth of later times. Aristotle * expressly denies that the early physicists made any distinction between matter and its moving cause, and adds that Anaxagoras was the first who arrived at the idea of a formative intelligence. Thales could not have had any idea of such creative power. He believed in the gods and generation of the gods ; but they, like all things else, had their origin in * Metaph. i. 3. Speculations of Anaximenes. 75 water. Beyond that powerful element he saw noth- ing. By it he sought to unitize the diverse phenom- ena of nature. ANAX i MENES followed and developed tbp doctrines of his master, Thales.* He pursued the same meth- od, but arrived at different results. To him, water was not the most significant element. He felt with- in him something, he knew not what or wherefore, but which was ever present. This he called his life, and life he believed to be air. There was also, with- out, an invisible but ever-present air. The air with- in him was individualized life ; but was it not a part of that without ? Then was not this external air the universal life ? was it not the beginning of things ? He met confirmations of his ideas. The earth like a broad leaf rested upon it. All things were pro- duced from it, and all were resolved back into it. When we breathe, we inhale a portion of this univer- sal life. The universe became, to this philosopher, a living, breathing structure. It was an advance on the teachings of Thales, and even scientists of to-day repeat and prove its proposition. From air all things are created, and back to air all things are resolved. f Air answers a better purpose as a universal element than water. To Anaxagoras and his followers, it stood for God ; though any idea of such an intelli- gence they had not conceived. Air was their high- est ideal. DIOGENES, of Apollonia, flourished about 460 B. C. * Ritter. f Liebig. Chemical Lectures. Dumas. 76 Career of the God-Idea in History. He followed the preceding, but extended his spec- ulations. He was deeply impressed with the analogy between the soul, or life, and the air ; and he pushed this to its limits. What constitutes air, the creative origin of all things ? Its life. It has a soul higher than itself, and must consequently be prior in point of time : it must be the primordial element sought. The universe is a living creation, self, evolved by its own vitality. Thus obscurely is expressed the first dim concep- tion of a creative cause. Air as life did not neces- sarily possess intelligence. Diogenes endowed it with thought. "It knows much," he said ; "for, with- out reason, it would be impossible for all to be arranged duly and proportionally ; and whatever objects we consider will be found to be arranged and ordered in the best and most beautiful manner." As order can only originate in intelligence, there must be a soul. This was a great advance ; but how child- ish the application he made of it ! As air gives us life by respiration, worlds and the universe must respire. The attraction of moisture to the sun, or iron to the magnet, was a kind of respiration. Man's superiority over brutes is caused by his erect posture, enabling him to breath a purer air than animals whose heads are near the ground. Thus step by step did these oldest of philosophers painfully tread the misty uncertainty, and approach the conception of a universal soul. It was reached by means of a mistaken notion that the breath was the producer of life, and hence was, itself, living ; a Speculations of Anaximander. 77 notion growing out of superficial observation, and a childish appreciation of nature.* ANAXIMANDER, of Miletus, taught that " the Infi- nite is the source of all things." What he meant by the term " infinite," we cannot determine ; and even the ancients themselves were equally in the dark. We can readily see how he arrived at such a conclu- sion if we place ourselves in his position. He was a mathematician, and as such delighted in the purely abstract. Water, he argued, could not be the all ; for it was a thing, and a thing cannot be all things. Only the unlimited ALL could supply the conditions. The production of individual things resulted from the motion of the Infinite. This Infinite is one, yet all. Within it is com- prised the multiplicity of elements, which need only separation to appear as distinct phenomena. The decomposition of the Infinite is creation ; and this is the result of motion. " He regarded the Infinite as a being in a constant state of incipiency, which, however, is nothing but a constant secutive and con- cretion of immutable elements ; so that we might well say the parts of the whole are ever changing, while the whole is unchangeable." Lewes remarks, " The idea of elevating an abstrac- tion into a being the origin of all things is base- less enough. It is as if we were to say, there are numbers one, two, three, four, twenty, eighty, one * Ritter. This idea of the air being endowed with life is ex- pressed in the Bible : "And God breathed in his nostrHs, and he became a living soul." 78 Career of the God-Idea in History. hundred ; but there is also number in the abstract, of which these individual numbers are but concrete realization : without number there will be no num- bers. Yet so difficult is it for the human mind to divest itself of its own abstractions, and to consider them as no more than as abstractions, that this error lies at the root of the majority of philosophical sys- tems." * In modern times the doctrine of this phi- losopher has been revived by Hegel, who has only changed the words by which it is expressed. Anaximander's conception was not ideal. His " All Things " was purely physical. It was the de- scription of a fact, rather than the statement of a principle. His creation had existence, but -not infi- nite intelligence. He advanced a step, but the latter idea was to him unknown. PYTHAGORAS flourished about 500 B. C.f He is classed with the founders of mathematics. His sci- entific skill has been grossly exaggerated, as has been every portion of his life. He was called a worker of miracles, a teacher having more than hu- man wisdom ; and his birth was referred to a miracu- lous interposition of the gods. These fables show in what high estimation he was held by his contempo- raries. He taught in secret, and, like Christ, never wrote. His method was purely deductive, and deigned only to consider the most refined abstractions ; and hence his school has been styled the mathematical. The * Biog. Hist. Phil. f A very uncertain date. See Anthon's Class. Diet, p. 1 153. Speculations of Anaximander. 79 greatest mathematicians and astronomers of anti- quity were among his followers. With our present clear and positive knowledge of things, it is difficult to understand the doctrines of these early sages, who thought intently, but seeking to unravel the myste- rious web of creation by an evolution from their own minds, rather than by observing facts, were entirely befogged. They were children only, and were con- tent with the same reasoning which contents a child. Pythagoras taught that numbers were the principle of things." * Anaximander saw beyond this, that numbers were not final. In attributes and position, they are con- stantly changing. They are variable, while the eter- nal cause cannot vary. Pythagoras saw the neces- sity of such an unvarying existence, and called it number. An individual may change its position and attributes, but its numerical existence cannot be de- stroyed. It can never be less than one. Resolved into the minutest particles, each particle is one. Nu- merical existence, hence, is the only invariable exist- ence, and all things are but the copies of numbers. Analogies cannot be carried farther than this in re- lation to finite things, nor to the Infinite. The Infi- nite, therefore, must be one. One is the absolute number. It exists in and for itself. All others are but numerical relations of one. As one contains all other numbers, it contains the element of the whole world. One must be the beginning of all things ; for, with whatever we commence, we must start with one. * Aristotle, Metaph., i. 6. 8o Career of the God-Idea in History. It will be seen that the whole system rests on a verbal quibble ; but it was a quibble too profound for detection by the greatest of the Greeks. Unac- quainted with any other language, they fell into the natural mistake of making distinctions of words cor- respond to distinctions of things, and then reasoning from the words instead of the things. What Anaximander calls the Infinite, Pythagoras calls the One. Neither recognized mind as an attri- bute of the Infinite. The latter has been supposed to have taught that there was a " soul of the world," but no solid ground exists for such an opinion. This is an idea of much later date. His doctrine of the soul refutes it. He regarded mind as a phenom- enon. It is a self-moving monad, which in the planet or the brute loses its intelligence. If such concep- tions were held of finite mind, there could have been no idea of infinite intelligence. The interpretation given by Cicero, that Pythagoras conceived God to be the all-prevading soul of nature, of which human souls were portions, is refuted by Aristotle. * The Pythagorean God was the number one, the infinite measure of all other numbers. XENOPHANES, contemplating the blue arch above him, inclosing the world, unchangeable and eternal, pronounced the wonderful sentence, " The Infinite is a sphere." There was no anthropomorphism in his system. He was pantheistic. The universe was self-moving, self-existing. PARMENIDES taught that there was but one being. * Metaph., b. L, chap. 5. Speculations of Heraclitus. 81 Non-being was impossible. Hence the one is all existence, neither born nor dying. Zeno was born about 500 B. C., and was one of the most celebrated sages of antiquity. He was the inventor of that logic renowned as dialectics, so ably handled by Socrates and Plato. His doctrines may be thus briefly stated : * " There is but one being existing necessarily indivisible and infinite. To sup- pose that the one is divisible, is to suppose it finite. If divisible, it must be infinitely divisible. But sup- pose two things to exist, then there must necessarily be an interval between these two ; something sepa- rating and limiting them. What is that something ? It is some other thing. But then, if not the same thing, it must be also separated and limited ; and so on ad infinitum. Thus only one thing can exist as the substratum for all manifold appearances." Heraclitus declared the Infinite One to be fire. To him it was the type of spontaneous force and motion. He says, " The world was made neither by the gods nor man ; and it was and is and ever shall be an ever-living fire, in due measure self-en- kindling, and in due measure self-extinguished." This is only a modification of the previous systems. The water of Thales, and air of Anaximenes, is the fire of Heraclitus. Fire ever springing into flames, and passing into smoke and ashes, is a beautiful and striking emblem of the ebb and flow of being ; the restless changing flux of things which never are, but always becoming. This flux and reflux, he finely ex- * Lewes. 6 82 Career of the God-Idea in History. presses in his symbol of a river : " No one has ever been twice on the same stream, for different waters are constantly flowing down : it dissipates its waters and gathers them again, it approaches and recedes, it overflows and falls." " All is motion : there is no rest or quietude. As all life is change, and change is strife, the strife between opposite tendencies is the parent of all things." He was the first to teach the inherent vitality of nature ; that, while matter and its forms underwent endless .mutations, supreme har- mony ruled over all, and the Infinite Being remained changeless and undisturbed. ANAXAGORAS made some remarkable speculations on the origin of things, and anticipated by glimpses, as it were, many of the generalizations of modern science. He held, that, so far from the all being the one, it was the many. In the beginning the many were unmixed. What was to change their condition, and from their isolation evolve a harmonious state ? That power he declares to be intelligence, the mov- ing force of the universe. He rejected fate, and de- clared chance to be the cause unrecognized by hu- man reasoning. In a passage preserved by Simpli- cius, he says, " Intelligence is infinite and auto- cratic : it is mixed' up with nothing, but exists alone in and for itself. Were it otherwise, were it mixed up with anything, it would partake of the nature of all things ; for in all these is a part of all, and so that which is mixed with intelligence would prevent it from exercising power over all things." We here catch a glimpse of the modern idea of Deity acting Speculations of Empedocles. 83 through fixed and undeviating laws on matter, but not mixing otherwise with the matter acted on. Again he says, "Intelligence is of all things the subtlest and purest, and has entire knowledge of all. Everything which has a soul, whether great or small, is governed by intelligence. Intelligence knows all things separated ; and the things that were, and those which now are, and those which will be, all are arranged by intelligence." In this pas- sage, he anticipates, by hundreds of years, the ideas of his age. The infinite intelligence not only knows, but acts. There is only one intelligence, there can be but one ; but of substances there must be many. It must, however, be borne in mind that this intelli- gence bore no resemblance to human intelligence. It was an abstract term, and might with equal pro- priety have been called number, or the one. EMPEDOCLES, born at-Agrigentum /j/j/j B. C, re- sembled Pythagoras in the manner in which fable has surrounded his name. To him are ascribed the same august demeanor and power over the laws of nature. He proclaimed himself a god, and was so received by the citizens of a city at the time the rival in arts and, intelligence of Syracuse. He was trans- lated, amid a flood of great effulgence, during a sacred festival. Like all the sages of antiquity, he traveled in the East, and there learned the potent secrets of medicine, magic, and the wonderful art of prophecy. Each generation of philosophers made some advance on their predecessors, and Empedocles took 84 Career of the God-Idea in History. long strides ahead. Of the divine nature, the infi- nite All, he reasoned in the same manner we reason to-day. He maintained that like could only be known to like. By each element we learn the qualities of itself: as of fire, through fire ; of strife and love, through strife and love. Hence the divine can only be known through divine reason. That the divine is recognized by man, is proof that the divine exists. Knowledge and existence mutually imply each other. * He declared God to be destitute of all organs. " He is wholly and perfectly mind ineffable, holy, With rapid and swift glancing thought pervading the whole world." Of the creation, he beautifully said, " Fools, Who think aught can begin to be which formerly was not Or that aught that is can perish and utterly decay. Another truth I now unfold. No natural birth Is there of mortal things, nor death destructive final : Nothing is there but a mingling, and then a separation of the mingled, Which are called a birth and death by ignorant mortals." This creation, by mingling, presupposed certain primary elements, which were the material mingled. These elements were four in number, earth, air, fire, and water. Out of these, all things were created. The formative power was love. Of course there must be an antagonist to produce separation. This * Lewes. Speculations of Democrites. 85 was hate. Harmony was the perfect state ; discord the imperfect. Love was the creative, hate the de- structive, principle. " All the members of God war together, one after the other." His idea of God, of the One, was that of a " sphere in the bosom of harmony, fixed, in calm rest, gladly rejoicing." This sphere of love exists above and around the world. Hate has power over only the smaller portion of existence, only over those parts which become disconnected from the whole. DEMOCRITES, equally famous as the preceding, uttered some remarkable generalizations on creation. He rejected the preceding theories, and declared atoms, invisible, intangible, and indivisible, to be the primary elements ; thus anticipating, by a dream, one of the highest scientific conceptions of the pres- ent. The formation of things he attributed to des- tiny, but it is doubtful if he assigned intelligence to that destiny. The attempts to prove that he believed in an intelligence somewhat similar to the Anaxago- rian doctrine are not satisfactory ; and it is probable that the idea of a formative intelligence, held by all these early philosophers, has been over-drawn, and received an anthropomorphitic tinge from translators and commentators. We may smile at the boldness with which they rushed to the explanation of nature's profoundest secrets, but we cannot doubt their sincerity. They possessed few facts, and they did not use those they possessed. They trusted to intuition. The Greek 86 Career of the God-Idea in History. mind, like that of a child, was deductive rather than inductive. It struck at first at primary principles. Not content with the life long-toil of the accumula- . tion of facts, it made a direct dash at the underlying principles. As from generation to generation we observe its progress, it never throws off this incubus, but is filtered by its scorn of the primary instru- ments of thought, facts. The Greeks are diligent inquirers, and merit the praise which has been be- stowed upon them ; but, the moment they philoso- phized, they cast facts aside. The daring strides they made widened the bounds of human thought, and, by the constant mental warfare they created, make these sages, scattered along a thousand years, shine in a splendid galaxy across the millenniums since they passed away. From the obscure wordings of their doctrines, we may be wide of their meaning in our translations. Of this much we are certain : the early sages scorned the idea of a god with human qualities. They probably had no conception of such a being. The idea of an infinite and all-pervading cause existed in their minds. Like the child, they asked "Why?" "How?" "Wherefore?" They found no answer to the indefinable thoughts which existed inarticulate in their minds. The water of Thales, air of Anaximenes, the number of Pythago- ras, meant more than the words express. They stand for a great, unutterable thought. They stand for a struggle of a great soul endeavoring to express its half-formed, dimly seen ideas. Let us not smile, nor judge them, unless we first pass the gulf which di- Socrates. 87 vides the clear and precise thought of the present from the half-articulate efforts of olden time. We now approach SOCRATES, the most renowned philosopher of Greece. His ideas of Deity, as ex- pressed by Xenophon,* were as follows : " I will now relate the manner in which I once heard Socrates discoursing with Aristodemus, sur- named the Little, concerning the Deity ; for observ- ing that he neither prayed nor sacrificed to the gods, but, on the contrary, ridiculed and laughed at those who did, he said to him, " ' Tell me, Aristodemus, is there any man whom you admire on account of his merit ? ' Aristodemus having answered, ' Many,' ' Name some of them, I pray you.' ' I admire,' said Aristodemus, ' Homer for his Epic poetry, Melanippides for his dithyrambics, Sophocles for tragedy, Polycetus for statuary, and Zeuxis for painting.' " ' But which seems to you most worthy of admira- tion, Aristodemus, the artist who forms images void of motion and intelligence, or one who hath the skill to produce animals that are endued not only with activity, but understanding ? ' ' The latter, there can be no doubt,' replied Aristodemus ; 'provided the production was not the effect of chance, but of wis- dom and contrivance.' ' But since there are many things, some of which we can easily see the use of, . while we cannot say of others to what purpose they were produced, which of these, Aristodemus, do you suppose the work of wisdom ? ' 'It should seem * Memorabilia, i. 4, as rendered by Lewes. 88 Career of the God-Idea in History. the most reasonable to affirm it of those whose fitness and utility are so evidently apparent/ " ' But it is evidently apparent that He who at the beginning made man endued him with senses be- cause they were good for him ; eyes, wherewith to behold whatever was visible ; and ears, to hear what- ever was to be heard ; for say, Aristodemus, to what purpose should odors be prepared if the sense of smelling had been denied ? or why the distinctions of bitter and sweet, of savory and unsavory, unless a palate had been likewise given, conveniently placed, to arbitrate between them, and declare the difference ? Is not that Providence, Aristodemus, in a most emi- nent manner conspicuous, which, because the eye of man is so delicate in its contexture, hath therefore prepared eyelids like doors, whereby to secure it, which extend of themselves whenever it is needful, and again close when sleep approaches ? Are not these eyelids provided, as it were, with a fence on the edge of them, to keep off the wind, and guard the eye ? Even the eyebrow itself is not without its office, but, as a pent-house, is prepared to turn off the sweat, which, falling from the forehead, might enter and annoy that no less tender than astonishing part of us. Is it not to be admired that the ears should take in sounds of every sort, and yet are not too much filled by them ; that the fore-teeth of the animal should be formed in such a manner as is evi- dently best suited for the cutting of its food, as those on the side for grinding it to pieces ; that the mouth, through which this food is conveyed, should Socrates. 89 be placed so near the nose and eyes as to prevent the passing unnoticed whatever is unfit for nourish- ment ; while Nature, on the contrary, hath set at a distance, and concealed from the senses, all that might disgust or any way offend them ? And canst thou still doubt, Aristodemus, whether a disposition of parts like this should be the work of chance, or of wisdom and contrivance ? ' 'I have no longer any doubt,' replied Aristodemus ; ' and, indeed, the more I consider it, the more evident it appears to me that man must be the masterpiece of some great artificer ; carrying along with it infinite marks of the love and favor of Him who hath thus formed it.' "'And what thinkest thou, Aristodemus, of that de- sire in the individual which leads to the continuance of the species ; of that tenderness and affection in the female towards her young, so necessary for its preservation ; of that unrequited love of life, and dread of dissolution, which take such strong posses- sion of us from the moment we begin to be ? ' 'I think of them,' answered Aristodemus, ' as so many regular operations of the same great arid wise Artist deliberately determining to preserve what he hath made.' " ' But farther (unless thou desirest to ask me ques- tions), seeing, Aristodemus, thou thyself art con- scious of reason and intelligence, supposest thou there is no intelligence elsewhere ? Thou knowest thy body to be a small part of that wide extended earth which thou everywhere beholdest : the mois- ture contained in it, thou also knowest to be a small 90 Career of the God-Idea in History. portion of that mighty mass of waters, whereof seas themselves are but a part, while the rest of the ele- ments contribute out of their abundance to thy for- mation. It is the soul then, alone, that intellectual part of us, which is come to thee by some lucky chance, from I know not where. If so, there is in- deed no intelligence elsewhere ; and we must be forced to confess, that this stupendous universe, with all the various bodies contained therein, equally amazing, whether we consider their magnitude or number, whatever their use, whatever their order, all have been produced, not by intelligence, but by chance.' 'It is with difficulty that I can suppose otherwise,' returned Aristodemus: 'for I behold none of those gods whom you speak of as making and governing all things ; whereas I see the artists when at their work here among us.' ' Neither yet seest thou thy soul, Aristodemus ; which, however, most assuredly governs thy body : although it may well seem, by thy manner of talking, that it is chance, and not reason, which governs thee.' '"I do not despise the gods,' said Aristodemus : 'on the contrary, I conceive so highly of their excellence, as to suppose they stand in no need either of me or of my services.' ' Thou mistakest the matter, Aristodemus: the greater magnificence they have shown in their care of thee, so much the more honor and service thou owest them.' ' Be assured, ' said Aristodemus, ' if I once could be persuaded the gods take care of man, I should want no monitor to remind me of my duty.' ' And The Divine in Man. 91 canst them doubt, Aristodemus, if the gods take care of man ? Hath not the glorious privilege of walking upright been alone bestowed on him, whereby he may with the better advantage survey what is around him, contemplate with more ease those splendid ob- jects which are above, and avoid the numerous ills and inconveniences which would otherwise befall him ? Other animals indeed they have provided with feet, by which they may remove from one place to another ; but to man they have also given hands, with which he can form many things for his use, and make himself happier than creatures of any other kind. A tongue hath been bestowed on every other animal ; but what animal, except man, hath the power of forming words with it, whereby to explain his thoughts, and make them intelligible to others ? " ' But it is not with respect to the body alone that the gods have shown themselves thus bountiful to man. Their most excellent gift is that soul they have infused into him, which so far surpasses what is elsewhere to be found ; for by what animal, except man, is even the existence of those gods discovered, who have produced, and still uphold in such regular order, this beautiful and stupendous frame of the universe ? What other species of creature is to be found that can serve, that can adore them ? What other animal is able, like man, to provide against the assaults of heat and cold, of thirst and hunger ; that can lay up remedies for the time and of sickness, and improve the strength nature has given by a well- proportioned exercise ; that can receive, like him, 92 Career of the God-Idea in History. information or instruction, or so happily keep in memory what he hath seen and heard and learned ? These things being so, who seeth not that man is, as it were, a God in the midst of this visible creation ? So far doth he surpass, whether in the endowments of soul or body, all animals whatsoever that have been produced therein : for, if the body of the ox had been joined to the mind of man, the acuteness of the latter would have stood him in small stead, while un- able to execute the well-designed plan ; nor would the human form have been of more use to the brute, so long as it remained destitute of understanding. But in thee, Aristodemus, hath been joined to a won- derful soul a body no less wonderful ; and sayest thou, after this, the gods take no thought for me ? What wouldst thou then more to convince thee of their care ? ' " He seems to have entertained the mechanical theory of nature, which Paley taught with such suc- cess, but now becoming obsolete. Such a being at once becomes a personality, a man. It can only be grasped by the mind after the loss of its infinite qualities. EUCLID maintained that there was but one unut- terable being, to be known by reason only. This being was not simply The One, nor simply intelli- gence : it was The Good. This being received various names : sometimes Wisdom, sometimes God, at oth- ers Reason. This one Good is the only thing which exists. All else is phenomenal and transitory. The doctrines of PLATO, the ardent disciple of Speculations of Plato. 93 Socrates, have peculiar interest ; as they have been recently revived, and are considered by many as the most profound ever enunciated. They also exerted a great influence on infantile Christianity. Lewes presents the following masterly summary of his doc- trines : " In the same way as Plato sought to detect the one amidst the multiplicity of material phenomena, and, having detected it, declared it to be the real essence of matter, so also did he seek to detect the one amidst the multiplicity of ideas, and, having detected it, declared it to be God. What ideas were to phe- nomena, God was to ideas, the last result of gener- alization. God was thus the One Being, comprising within himself all other beings ; the > xJ Tto'kl.d ; the cause of all things, celestial and terrestrial. God was the supreme idea. Whatever view we take of the Platonic cosmology, whether God created ideas, or whether he only fashioned unformed matter after the model of ideas, we are equally led to the conviction, that God represented the supreme idea of all existence ; the great intelligence, source of all other intelligences ; the sun whose light illumined creation. God is perfect, ever the same, without en- vy, wishing nothing but good ; for, although a clear knowledge of God is impossible to mortals, an approx- imation to that knowledge is possible. We cannot know what he is : we can only know what he is like. He must be good, because self-sufficing ; and the world is good, because he made it. Why did he make it ? God made the world because he was free 94 Career of the God-Idea in History. from envy, and wished that all things should resem- ble him as much as possible : he therefore persuaded necessity to become stable, harmonious, and fash- ioned according to excellence. Yes, " persuaded " is Plato's word, for there were two eternal principles, intelligence and necessity ; and from the mixture of these the world was made. But intelligence per- suaded necessity to be fashioned according to excel- lence. He arranged chaos into beauty ; but as there is nothing beautiful but intelligence, and as there is no intelligence without a soul, he placed a soul into the body of the world, and made the world an animal. " Plato's proof of the world being an animal is too curious a specimen of his analogical reasoning to be passed over. There is warmth in the human being : there is warmth also in the world. The human be- ing is composed of various elements, and is there- fore called a body ; the world is also composed of various elements, and is therefore a body : and, as our bodies have souls, the body of the world must have a soul ; and that soul stands in the same relation to our souls as the warmth of the world stands to our warmth. Having thus demonstrated the world to be an animal, it was but .natural he should conceive that animal as resembling its Crea- tor, and human beings as resembling the universal animal, TO nav coov. " As soon as the world, that image of the eternal gods, as soon as that vast animal be- gan to move, live, and think, God looked upon his work, and was glad. Platonic Sol' ,tion of Problem of Evil. 95 " But, although God in his goodness would have made nothing evil, he could not prevent the exist- ence of it. Various disputes have been warmly carried on by scholars, respecting the nature of this evil which Plato was forced to admit. Some have conceived it nothing less than the Manichaean doc- trine. Thus much we may say : The notion of an an- tagonist principle is inseparable from every religious formula : as God can only be good, and as evil does certainly exist, it must exist independently of him ; it must be eternal. Plato cut the matter very short by his logical principle, that, since there was a good, there must necessarily be the contrary of good ; namely, evil. If evil exists, how does it exist, and where? It cannot find place in the celestial region of ideas. It must therefore necessarily dwell in the ter- restrial region of phenomena : its home is the world it is banished from heaven. And is not this logical ? What is the world of phenomena but an imperfect copy of the world of ideas ? and how can the imper- fect be the purely good ? When ideas are " realized," as the pantheists would say ; when ideas, pure, im- mutable essences, are clothed in material forms, or when matter is fashioned after the model of those ideas, what can result but imperfections ? The ideas are not in this world : they are only in a state of becoming, OVTVXJ ovxa, not ^vo^sva. Phenomena are in their very nature imperfect : they are perpetually striving to exist as realities. In their constitution there is something of the divine : an image of the 96 Career of the God-Idea in History. Idea, and some participation in it ; but more of the primeval chaos. " Those, therefore, who say that Plato thought that ' Evil was inherent in matter/ though express- ing themselves loosely, express themselves, on the whole, correctly. Matter was the great necessity which intelligence fashioned. Because it was neces- sity, and unintelligent, it was evil ; for intelligence alone can be good. " Now, as this world of phenomena is the region where evil dwells, we must use our utmost endeav- ors to escape from it. And how escape ? By sui- cide ? No : by leading the life of the gods. And every Platonist knows that the life of the gods con- sists in the eternal contemplation of truth, of ideas. Thus, as on every side, are we forced to encounter dialectics as the sole salvation of man. " From the above explanation of evil, it will be seen that there is no contradiction in Plato's saying, that the quantity of evil in this life exceeded that of the good : it exceeds it in the proportion that phenomena exceed noumena, that matter exceeds ideas. " But, although evil be a necessary part of the world, it is in constant struggle with good. What is this but the struggle of becoming ? And man is endowed with free will and intelligence : he may therefore choose between good and evil. And ac- cording to his choice will his future life be regulated. Metempsychosis was a doctrine Plato borrowed from Pythagoras ; and in that doctrine he could find argu- Ideas of the Stoics. 97 ments for the enforcement of a sage and virtuous life, which no other afforded at that epoch." The stoics said there two elements in nature. The first was primordial matter, out of which every- thing is formed. The second is the active creative principle, reason, destiny, God. The divine reason acting on nature bestows the laws which govern it. God is the reason of the world. From this date they deduced their system of ethics. If the divine reason bestows the laws which govern matter, to live in conformity to reason must be the practical moral law ; and there is but one formula for morals,, and that is, " Live harmoniously with nature." A better con- clusion, no matter from what data derived, cannot be attained. In the conflicting atmosphere of wordy dispute and rash speculation, it gleams like a living thought torn from the present. Thus far we have spoken only of the ideas of the sages, men of thought, who possessed all the know- ledge and culture of their times. There is another and more common view known as the mythology of Greece and Rome : the system known to the common people, and worked into form by the poets. The philosophers regarded the great truths of religion as too sacred to be given to the common people. They shrouded them with mystery. The myths they encouraged they did not themselves entertain. Just as at present there is a religious system, with creeds and dogmas and myths for the mass of the people, while the best thinkers of the age are above them, tolerating them only from policy and expediency. 7 98 Career of the God-Idea in History. The cultivated nations of antiquity founded their religion on mystery. Where and how the "Mys- teries " were founded has created much discussion. Their origin is lost in the night of time. They were supported by the Egyptians, and perfected by the Greeks, growing, little by little, under the guidance of a priesthood, who, by dealing with things pertain- ing to the divine, came to be regarded as personally divine, and nearer the gods than other men. The priests were educated in all that was known in science and art. This knowledge, enveloped in a sacred dia- lect, and exciting reverence by its unintelligibility, was marshaled to work miracles before the terri- fied initiates. Electricity, fulminating compounds, hydrostatical pressure, and secret mechanical con- trivances, were commanded by their exhaustless wealth. Such charms and attractions were thrown around the system, so vividly were the secrets of life and death presented to the votary, that Cicero says, " Men came from the most distant shores to be initiated at Eleusis ; " and Sophocles remarks, " True life is to be found only among the initiates : all other places are full of evil." The Mysteries was the great church of the ancient world, in which concentrated all its spiritual ideas, around which clustered all its hopes, and from which Christianity drew the major part of its doctrines. The efforts of Julian to stay the tide of Christian reform, and restore the old doctrines ; the numerous protests furnished by history, show how deeply rooted were the Mysteries in the hearts of the people. The Sacred Mysteries. 99 What were these Mysteries ? From their secret character little can be gathered of their most esoteric parts ; but, from the allusions made by different classic authors, a faint idea can be gathered of their surpassing beauties and awful terrors. As celebrated at Eleusis, by their singular magnificence and impos- ing grandeur, they far eclipsed all others of the world, and ancient writers take delight in exalting, and with false learning gathering clouds around them. These Mysteries were established about fourteen centuries before Christ ; and such was their hold on the popular mind, that for eighteen hundred years they were celebrated, and were only abolished by the severity of the bigoted Theodosius the Great. He would not have the old faith linger otherwise than in the Church. During all that period, the Mysteries were held in superstitious reverence. If any one revealed the secrets intrusted at initiation, the ven- geance of the gods fell on his head, and it was deemed unsafe to dwell in the same house with such a wretch, whom, if the gods spared, was ignominiously put to death. The stigma of non-observance was far greater than that attending the infidelity at present. It was a weighty charge brought against Socrates, that he neglected the worship of the gods. Every five years, all Athens assembled at Eleusis, in Attica, to celebrate those solemnities. The vast concourse gathered on the plains, around a splendid temple erected over a cavern, in which, at an earlier day, the rites were first held. This cave was exca- vated into a labyrinth of passages, in which th ioo Career of the God-Idea in History. novitiate could be led through darkness, until bewil- dered and overcome with terror and fatigue. This temple was of the purest Doric architecture, its end- less colonnades chiseled from snowy marble, without spot or stain. It stood on a swell of ground, and could be seen, rising in crystal beauty, by all the mighty multitude. Over its front was a colossal head of Jupiter, calm, beneficent, all-powerful. On either side a statue of Ceres smiled on the passing worshiper. All the effect produced by grandeur of architec- ture, or beauty of form, was lavishly bestowed. Per- sons of both sexes, and without regard to age, were initiated. They had first to enter the lesser mysteries of Agrae on a previous year ; then, at the expiration of which, subject themselves to a rigid system of purification. For nine days they bathed and fasted, keeping themselves uncontaminated by the world. Then they presented themselves before the temple of the greater mystery. Athens has assembled-; old men and young, husband and wife, and prattling babe. Athens has betaken herself to the field for a time, to indulge in free communion with nature and the divine spirits whom she believes govern the world. Those who await initiation the indoctrin- ization into their subtile wisdom have crowns of flowers, and offer sacrifices and prayers. Under their feet they wear the skin of some animal offered to Jupiter. Then they offered a sow to Ceres, in thankfulness for the influence for good she exerts. They were then prepared to enter the presence of The Sacred Mysteries. 101 the gods, having overcome the sins of the body. Night settles over the mountains of the most beau- tiful spot on earth. They silently repose, overlooked by the brilliant stars. A multitude of fires glimmer over the plain, but the people have gone to the tem- ple. They are assisting the uninitiated in their first lessons. With crowns of myrtle, these were led into the temple. At the door was a fount of holy water, in which they washed. Above this, in a recess, sat a priest. With a calm, low, but terrible voice, he asked the candidates, one by one, the following ques- tions, all of which they must answer in the affirma- tive, or be at once expelled : " Have you passed the mystery of the Agrae ? Are you pure and spotless from the world ? Are you free from crime ? " Then, in an impressive tone, he chanted, " He who enters must be pure, or the gods will destroy him. He who passes this portal goes into a shadow, from which only the just return. O weak, thoughtless, and improvident mortal, daring to penetrate the realm of the gods, aspire to truth and perfection, and strive to discard the flesh and the world." Then they were led onward, in front of a lofty tribunal, when the mysteries, or laws, were read to them. These were written on two stones cemented together. Then they were led before another tribu- nal, more lofty and imposing than the other. Above it was a zone, on which was painted the twelve signs of the zodiac : on its front was a blazing sun, on either side of which was a winged globe. The in- tense light beneath revealed the priest seated in an IO2 Career of the God-Idea in History. ivory chair, his dark mantle embroidered with gold, and a silver crown on his temples. All else was blackness and profoundest gloom. The awe-struck initiates could see nothing but the form of the priest glittering in the terrible darkness. As they paused before him, he asked them a series of questions referring to the conduct of their lives. When they were answered, he waved them onward into the pro- found gloom. As they advanced, a terrific blast extinguished their dim torches ; the darkness became stifling ; the trembling worshiper was blinded with lightning, that seemed to hiss through the void. The crash of thunders deafened their ears ; the earth swayed and quaked under their feet, and from its bowels came the most frightful bowlings and meanings, as of myriads of lost souls writhing in the agony of scorching flames. Out of the darkness leaped spec- tres of gigantic and awful outline. Sometimes these shades threatened to destroy the pale and trembling worshiper : at others, they mockingly laughed and derided, and the vaulted rocks echoed their demoniac merriment. Then others would spring up, like a body of flame, and as instantly disappear. Then a thousand would arise out of the blackness, and with a sound of a whirlwind rush towards the intruders. As they came near, they vanished, and the place was left in night, and from afar came the most dismal and terrifying wails. Such were the sufferings of those who were un- true to the Mysteries, by revealing the secrets there The Sacred Mysteries. 103 revealed, of those who were unjust and evil on earth, and who disregarded the rights of their fellow-men. No one, not even the stoutest-hearted soldier, imbued with superstition as they were, could endure the terrible ordeal. They sank, stupefied, on the marble floor, and stared vacantly at the horrid forms of men, the flying dragons and scorpions, the huge and ravenous beasts and birds of prey, which winged hissingly above them. Their hair stood upright, the cold perspiration beaded on their rigid foreheads. Their guide assumed the form of a demon ; and they arose, and mechanically followed through long and winding passages and labyrinthine mazes. Hoarse voices shouted and shrieked behind them, to seize and destroy the outcasts, to drag them with vul- ture-beaks into the abysm of fire. The hissing of their breath was close upon them ; the swift sound of myriads smote the ear ; their very touch could be felt by the initiate, too frightened to escape. Then in an instant light broke in a glittering flood of silver over the scene. They stood in a magnificent hall, lighted from an azure dome above, by a light like the sun's. Marble pillars supported it on every side, be- tween which, in various attitudes, the gods and god- desses were chiseled from Parian. Surges of most exquisite melody filled the place, and thrilled the soul with its perfection. With unspeakable joy they beheld a being clothed in white, with silver embroi- dery, descending from a throne, and, taking each by the hand, pronounce the words, " It is finished." * * Apaleius. IO4 Career of the God-Idea in History. Out of the blackness and turmoil ; out of the in- sane madness, the death-grappling of this life ; out of its seething trials, and groans of anguish, its night of sorrow and pain, comes the light, the bright day of joy, the beautiful day of peace and ever- enduring happiness. In ourselves we are nothing. The gods are all in all. Rely on their guidance,, and reject the sham of this life. Such was the lesson burned into the heart ; branded indelibly into the fibres of the soul. All that was awful, terrific, amazing, dreadful, was presented ; and after it the sinking soul was lifted to heaven, on the wings of all that please and de- light. What were the words read from the tablets of stone, for which these mysteries were an introduc- tion and a safeguard ? So profoundly was the knowledge of them concealed, that historians have never obtained a syllable. They were, probably, the rules for moral conduct, similar to those which Moses gave the Israelites, principles which man early learns, and which naturally arrange themselves into a moral code. The Mysteries were celebrated for nine days, dur- ing which all distinctions of rank and wealth were abolished. Lycurgus passed a law that any woman who should attend in a chariot should be fined six thousand drachmas. These nine days were filled with interesting and curious episodes. The meet- ing on the first day was that of a social gathering. Afterwards they bathed in the sea, to purify them- The Sacred Mysteries. 105 selves ; offered a sacrifice to the gods, and a small quantity of barley to Ceres, the goddess of the har- vest. Every ceremony had a meaning to the enthu- siastic worshipers. The processions following the basket of Ceres, of women carrying the various products of the earth, the pausing on the bridge Cephissus to deride the passer-by, the games where- in the reward for the victor was a measure of barley, possessed meanings, which, however dim to us, were significant to their votaries. They have been charged with immorality by big- oted sectaries who wished thereby to prove the ne- cessity of revelation ; but the concurrent voice of antiquity confirms their pure morality. Men like Plato, Sophocles, Lycurgus, and Cicero, eulogize their influence. Minor branches may have de- scended to vile practices ; but it was always said of the great Mysteries, that they purified the heart, inspired and calmed the mind, and, with an exalted morality, taught the hopes of sublime realities of a higher life. * Such was the religion Christianity supplanted, not Judaism. From it was drawn the primary doctrines of the Orthodox faith, such as the trinity, the incar- nation, the resurrection of the dead, the atonement, hell, heaven, purgatory, and the judgment-day. Such was the magnificent esoteric system of the ancients. It was only open to the aristocrats of in- tellect. The commonality received another form more consistent with their mental conceptions * Cicero. De. Leg., lib. ii. cap. xiv. io6 Career of the God-Idea in History. With them Jupiter ruled the vaults of air, Neptune the ocean, and Pluto the dark and shadowy under- world. From the Thunderer on high Olympus, down the interminable distance to man, there was a succes- sion of deities, possessing all grades of intelligence and power. Some writers argue that these myths were inventions of priests, and others that they are symbolic : both explanations are unnecessary, for they are spontaneous creations of a buoyant fancy, brought in its youth and immaturity in contact with the startling phenomena of nature. Poetry ruled. Rocks, rivers, streams, woods, trees, fountains, all were personified. The child afraid of the dark per- sonifies night, and fear of the dark forest peoples the wood with dryads. The " Mysteries " are of a much later growth. There can be no priests until the accumulation of a rude mythology renders their mediation necessary. Jupiter was regarded by the people as the central power, gathering around him the other deities in a family of the gods. He assigns their provinces, and controls their power. Their combined efforts do not change his purpose, and even when he rebukes them the serenity of his soul is undisturbed. His might is irresistible, and his wisdom unsearchable. He holds the golden balance in which is poised the des- tiny of nations and men. The eternal order of events and earthly kings receive their power from him. But, omnipotent and infinite as he is repre- sented, he has his human side, and is subject to all the passions. The Family of the Gods. 107 Though secure from dissolution, and exceedingly beautiful and strong, and warmed with a purer blood, his celestial power is sensible to pleasure and pain. In common with all the inferior gods, he needs the refreshment of ambrosial food, and the savor of sac- rifices is grateful to him. He loves, hates, is jealous, wavers in his purposes, is overreached by artifice, blinded by desire, and, by resentment, hurried into disreputable violence. * He is nothing more than a Greek intensified and given the largest ideal power. As the gods are in every respect human, the an- cients believed that to gain their favor required the same manners as to approach a powerful mortal, homage and tribute ; or, in the language of reli- gion, worship and sacrifice. The gods were re- galed with the fragrance from the altar ; and, the more sumptuous the offering, the better were they pleased. If the god was thought angry, the offering was unusually large. If exceedingly wroth, nothing less than a human life would serve the purpose. With the Greeks, the immolation of human victims was early discarded for milder forms ; but there can be no doubt but their altars were once stained with human gore, as were those of all the surrounding nations. Jupiter, the supreme, becomes the father of the inferior gods and goddesses. Minerva sprang from his head ; Themis bore him the Seasons and Fates ; the ocean-nymph Eurynome bore him the Graces ; * Thirwall. 1 08 Career of the God-Idea in History. Ceres, by him, became mother of Proserpine ; Mne- mosyne, of the Muses ; Latona, of Apollo and Diana ; and his last wife, Juno, bore him Mars, Hebe, and Slithgia. Homer says that Venus was the daugh- ter of Jupiter and Dione. Mortal women also bore him a numerous progeny, and his purposes were often effected by disguise and deceit. The application of this to the supreme God may seem sacrilegious ; but we must remember, and pass judgment with proper reservation, that Jehovah the Supreme God is represented in the Bible with human passions and frailties. He ate " veal " with Abra- ham ; " wrestled " with Jacob ; talked familiarly with Moses on the most common topics ; smelt a " sweet savor " from the burning sacrifice ; " repented " making man ; was cruel, wrathful, jealous, and re- vengeful. We have in this chapter condensed the progress of opinions in relation to God of nearly a thousand years. From the simple conception of water as the Infinite, to the Eternal Infinite Intelligence of Socra- tes, is a gulf spurned by the most gigantic labors of the human mind. We shall now see how these lines of advance converge, and re-appear through the Alexandrian school in Christianity. VI. THE GOD-IDEA" OF THE ALEXANDRIAN SCHOOL AND EARLY CHRISTIANITY THOSE who adore me devoutly are in me, and I in them. Crishna is at all times present everywhere ; just as fire, though concealed in wood. BHAGAVAT GEETA. To know that God is, and that ALL is God, this is the substance of the Vedas. VEDAS. EVERY violet blooms of God ; each lily is fragrant with the presence of Deity. The awful scenes of storm and lightning and thunder seem but the eternal sounds of the great concert, wherewith God speaks to man. PARKER. I HAD foolishly hoped that I should soon behold the Deity. JUSTIN MARTYR. r I "*HE Alexandrian school of Dialectics stood be- J- tween the philosophers and the Christian world. In its teachings we discover the dawn of those abstruse speculations which early engaged the church fathers in never-ending discussion. PHILO was the first of the Neo-Platonists. A Jew by birth, he mingled, in a strange mysticism, Greek philosophy and Oriental imagination. He dis- trusted the truth of sensuous knowledge, and denied the value of reason as a criterion of truth. He be- lieved in a higher faculty in man, which he called faith. He taught that God is ineffable and incomprehen- 1 10 Career of the God-Idea in History. sible. We may learn his existence, but not his na- ture. The simple knowledge that he exists, in it- self, is the knowledge of his being one, perfect, immutable, and without attribute. But this is not a knowledge of the elements of his perfection. This finite eye cannot penetrate. We can only believe. If we cannot learn this, we can his essence. We learn this in the Logos, or word. The word forms a strange feature in the mystical system, and was in- serted in the Bible. God being wholly inapproach- able, there must be something intermediate between him and man, and this is supplied by the word. According to Philo, the word is God's thought. This thought is twofold. The thought embracing all ideas, and the realized thought : thought became the world. In this statement, the trinity of Plotinus is foreshadowed : first, God the Father ; second, God the Son, or the word ; and, third, the World. He agreed with the Cabalists, that there was a mother of the universe, whom he called Sophia, or wisdom. Ideas or types, according to which the Logos formed the world, originated from the two. The Logos he calls " the Son of God," " the express image of God." No created being resembled the Supreme Father. Man was created in the image of the Logos. Such were the vague dreams of one who lived near the eventful dawn of the present era. Plotinus, who per- haps represents the school better than any other of its adherents, held, with Plato, that there could be but one science of universals. Individual things were but phenomena swiftly passing away ; had no real exist- Speculations of Plotinus. 1 1 1 ence, and were hence unworthy of the attention of the philosopher. Ideas were the only universals. The ideal world is the perfect expression of the mode of God's existence. The sensible world is un- real to us through our senses. Of the ideal we gain glimpses through the reminiscence which the sensi- ble world awakens ; but how are we to take the last step ? how are we to understand the Deity ? As we are finite beings, to comprehend the Infi- nite, we must become infinite ourselves. It cannot be through reason ; which necessarily is finite, and embraces only finite objects. It must be through some higher and altogether impersonal faculty which identifies with its object. * The only possible ground for knowledge is the identity of subject and object, or, in other words, of the thought with the thing thought of. Knowledge and being are identical. " If," says Plotinus, " knowledge is the same as the thing known, the finite, as finite, can never know the Infinite, because it cannot be the Infinite. To attempt, therefore, to know the Infinite by reason is futile : it can only be known in immediate presence. The faculty by which the mind divests itself of its personality is ecstasy. In this ecstasy the soul be- comes freed from its material prison, separated from individual consciousness, and becomes absorbed in the infinite intelligence from which it emanated. In this ecstasy it contemplates real existence : it iden- tifies itself with that which it contemplates." * Plotinus, En. v. lib. 5, c. 10. 112 Career of the God-Idea in History. This speculation, while it savors of Platonism, in- dicates its Oriental origin. Thus the Alexandrians answered the world-old question, " How do we know God?" That man has a knowledge of God, is proof that there is some method of obtaining such knowledge. Reason is inadequate because finite. It must be obtained through ecstasy, in which the soul lost its conscious individuality, and came in contact with, and was absorbed by, the infinite intelligence. To understand the Infinite, man must for the moment become the Infinite. Absurd as this conslusion appears, it is not as ab- surd as the opposite, which degrades the Infinite, instead of exalting the finite. It is not as absurd as the anthropomorphic, which is universally entertained by Christendom. The Alexandrian school, in their speculations on the nature of the Infinite, furnished material for the church dogma of the holy trinity ; the basis, as M. Saisset remarks, of all Christian metaphysics. Almost all the important heresies have grown out of it, and therefore it is of deep interest to determine its parentage. It is maintained by one party, that the church received it from the Alexandrians ; and, by another, that the latter received it from Christi- anity. The first party are certainly in the right, for the doctrine is traceable through preceding centuries of thought, and in that school is more completely developed. The doctrine of the trinity may be stated thus : Speculations of the Alexandrians. 113 God is three, and at the same time is one. His nature contains within itself three distinct sub- stances, that is, persons, which make one being. The first is not being, nor the one being, but sim- ply unity. The second is intelligence; which is iden- tical with being. The third is universal soul, cause of all activity and life. * These strange and seem- ingly conflicting conceptions are obtained by an in- genious method of reasoning. Man looks abroad over the realm of nature, and sees change every- where. This change is not fortuitous, as the most cursory investigation shows, but proceeds to fixed ends and purposes. He asks for the cause, and the most apparent is life. The world is alive with a life similar in kind to his own. Proceeding farther in the investigation, and inquiring into the origin of life, he finds that it is motion. But this motion does not work by chance. It is directed, and directed intelligently. Here, then, is the cause he has been seeking : it is intelligent motion. What is this but the wonderful power residing in man himself? What is it but a soul ? Is it not a fragment like in kind, different only in degree, from the universal and eternal soul of the world ? And what is this universal and eternal soul, but God ? This is the first person of the Alexandrian trinity. But men who were bred in the schools of Plato and Aristotle could not rest here. Trained to wrestle with the most abstract thoughts, they soon discovered that the term # intelligent activity " was * Biog. His. Philosophy, Lewes, p. 321. H4 Career of the God-Idea in History. capable of farther reduction. There are two distinct ideas expressed. Intelligence is referable to the mind of some intelligent being. Motion is the di- vine soul ; intelligence, the divine mind. It is pure thought abstracted from all thinking. It does not reason, for to reason is to acquire knowledge. It sees the consequence simultaneously with the prem- ises. It is eternal existence embracing all ideas. Here, seemingly, is the ultimate of abstraction, pure thought abstracted from thinking, and pure being abstracted from existence ; but the Alexandrian Di- alecticians saw a still higher form. God, as exist- ence and thought, is God as conceived by human reason ; only a hint of the pure unity, its highest ideal. Its type is human reason. An examination of thought reveals that to think is to distinguish our existence from some other existence. But noth- ing can be external with God. In him there can be no distinction, determination, nor relation. Hence, he must be superior to thought, or being ; must be a unity, which is not existence nor intelligence. Unity is omnipresent, and the bond which unites all complex things, the absolute universal one. It is the highest perfection and supreme good. Plotinus saw that God was not defined by this effort of logic. What he really is cannot be known. It is folly to strive to comprehend him. What is this unity ? It is " absolute' negation ; " it is the ul- timate of logic ; what Hegel would call the " abso- lute nothing," the immanent negative. There only can the mind rest ; for, when it predicates anything Why God Creates. 115 of the point at which it stops, it is forced to admit something beyond. Its course is roughly drawn by the fable of the world resting on the back of an ele- phant, that stands on the back of a tortoise, that reposed on nothing. At the absolute negation only, can such logic find repose. Plotinus had discovered the necessity of unity as the basis of existence. If the unity had ever re- mained alone, the many could not have been created. The many implies the one, as the one implies the many. Each principle engenders that which follows a power ineffable, and exercised from generation to generation, till its utmost limits are attained. The Christians were satisfied by saying, God created the universe by the simple effort of his will ; for with omnipotence all things are possible, and one effort is no greater than another. The Alex- andrians said that the world was a manifestation of God. It is distinct from, yet a part of, God. A ready answer was found for the question, " Why should God create ? " Aristotle says, " A God who does not think is unworthy of respect. If intelligent, he must be active. A force, to be such, must engen- der something." The creation, therefore, springs from the very nature of God. He is of necessity a cre- ator. He is like a sun, constantly throwing off rays, without diminution of substance. All change, the ceaseless flux and reflux of things, is perishable, and has no absolute truth or duration. To die is to live. It is to throw off the individuality with its pitiable limitations of space and time, and be absorbed into 1 1 6 Career of the God-Idea in History. the bosom of the Infinite One. In the momentary thrills of ecstasy the soul is thus for the time ab- sorbed, and feels the exquisite rapture of the immor- tal being, and becomes conscious of the divine light struggling to break through the fetters of flesh, and free itself. Imbued with such conceptions, the dy- ing Plotinus exclaims, ." I am struggling to liberate the divinity within me." The slow development of these convictions in re- gard to God, and man's position and relations, is ob- servable through long centuries of painful thought. All the great minds, from Heraclites to Plotinus, were oppressed by a sense of their own littleness, and the fruitlessness of the attempt to arrive at ab- solute truth. They felt a contempt for themselves, and hence the popularity of the stoics and cynics. This life is nothing, the future is the all. . But we love life too well to destroy it. We are too mysteri- ously connected with the web of the world to cast it from us ; but we can become moral suicides, and hence asceticism. If man cannot command courage to leave the world, he can withdraw himself from its influence. He can become a stylite, or a hermit. Greek philosophy expired with the Alexandrian school. Beginning with Thales, it stretches over the long centuries in a complete circle of endeavor. However successful in other fields, in the solution of the nature of God, it made scarcely any advance. Mistaking the path of true investigation, its colossal genii wandered over an arid desert, boundless, awful, enchanting, but destitute of life or beauty. Thales Failure of the Greek Sages. 117 at the threshold saw as clearly as they who came seven centuries after him. They failed in solving this problem : but the human mind was cultivated by their efforts, as an athlete is strengthened for useful labor by the exertions of the gymnasium ; and the soil was prepared for the true method. They elevated ethics to the rank of a science, and extended the exceedingly narrow views of morality entertained by the Greeks, and prepared the way for the reception of those more perfect and complete conceptions of individual responsibilities and social relations known as Christianity. From the portico of the philosopher these ques- tions passed to the early Christians, who, in the ar- dent fervor of a new belief, sought their solution by ecstasy more than by reason. Plato, unable to solve the problem how from a di- vine unity the diversity of creation could arise, ana- lized this unity into three parts, the cause, the rea- son or Logos, and the soul or spirit of the universe. These metaphysical abstractions in his ardent imagi- nation were clothed with personality, and consid- ered as three gods, united with each other by mys- terious and ineffable generation. The Logos was the Son of the eternal Father and Creator, and Governor of the world. This doctrine was received and exemplified by the Alexandrian school, where the Mosaic doctrines met Grecian philosophy on equal grounds. The belief was a simple abstraction until the incarnation of the Logos in the person of Christ demonstrated its truth to the astonished Pa- 1 1 8 Career of the God-Idea in History. gans. The theology of Plato, anticipating by three hundred years that of Christ, naturally excited the curiosity of the early Christians, and by them was eagerly studied. The mysterious triad, or trinity, was vehemently agitated in the schools of Alexandria. With intense curiosity they sought the solution, but with results disproportioned to the labor expended. The great Athanasius confesses that in the vast undertaking he is lost, and that the more he thinks the less he understands. When the human mind measures it- self with the Infinite, it comprehends how inade- quate are its powers. Yet it was the boast of Tertullian that a Christian mechanic understood this subject better than a Gre- cian sage ; and it may be truly said, that, when the subject is so 'great, there is slight difference between what the wise or the foolish know. The salvation of the soul depended on the reception of this doc- trine ; and the more ignorant a person was, the more unthinkingly was the doctrine received. The trinity was the only escape of the early fathers who claimed the divinity of Christ. This was early made ; as the Christians of Bithynia, only fourscore years after the death of Christ, declared before the tribunal of Pliny that they received Christ as a god, and worshiped him as such. They could not believe that the Great Eternal One had become incarnated. They held the worship of a created be- ing in horror, but the Platonic trinity completely met the difficulty. It was gratifying to contemplate Three Aspects of the Trinity. 1 1 9 the Supreme as undisturbed, while the Logos be- came incarnated and a mediator between God and man. The disputants at first confined themselves more to the distinctions than the quality of the persons of the Godhead ; but they afterwards exhausted the latter subject as well. They next investigated the eternity of the Logos, and the wild flames of ecclesi- astical discord were awakened. The learned, pure, and blameless Arius preached the unity of God, and was condemned as a heretic, a sentence confirmed by the Council of Nice. When this subject is investigated, it is found to receive three distinct forms in the human mind, and is presented by Gibbon in the following masterly manner : * " I. According to the first hypothesis, which was maintained by Arius and his disciples, the Logos was a dependent and spontaneous production, created from nothing by the will of the Father. The Son, by whom all things were made, had been begotten before all worlds, and the longest of the astronomi- cal periods could be compared only as a fleeting mo- ment to the extent of his duration ; yet this dura- tion was was not infinite, and there had been a time which preceded the ineffable generation of the Logos. On this only-begotten Son the Almighty Father had transfused his ample spirit, and impressed the efful- gence of his glory. Visible image of invisible per- fection, he saw, at an immeasurable distance beneath * Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 1 20 Career of the God-Idea in History. his feet, the thrones of the brightest archangels : yet he shone only with a reflected light ; and like the sons of the Roman emperors, who were invested with the titles of Caesar or Augustus, he governed the universe in obedience to the will of his Father and Monarch. " II. In the second hypothesis, the Logos pos- sessed all the inherent, incommunicable perfections, which religion and philosophy appropriate to the Supreme God. Three distinct and infinite minds or substances, three co-equal and co-eternal beings, composed the Divine Essence ; and it would not have implied contradiction, that any of them should not have existed, or that they should ever cease to exist. The advocates of a system which seemed to establish three independent deities attempted to preserve the unity of the first cause, so conspicuous in the design and order of the world, by the perpet- ual- concord of their administration and the essen- tial agreement of their will. A faint resemblance of this unity of action may be discovered in the so- cieties of men, and even of animals. The causes which disturb their harmony proceed only from the imperfection and inequality of their faculties : but the omnipotence which is guided by infinite wisdom and goodness cannot fail of choosing the same means for the accomplishment of the same ends. "III. Three Beings, who, by the self-derived ne- cessity of their existence, possess all the divine at- tributes in the most perfect degree ; who are eternal in duration, infinite in space, and intimately present Attempts to Escape. 121 to each other, and to the whole universe, irresisti- bly force themselves on the astonished mind, as one and the same Being, who, in the economy of grace, as well in that of nature, may manifest himself under different forms, and be considered under different aspects. By this hypothesis, a real substantial trin- ity is refined into a trinity of names and abstract modifications, that subsist only in the mind which conceives them. The Logos is no longer a person, but an attribute ; and it is only in a figurative sense that the epithet of Son can be applied to the eternal reason which was with God from the beginning, and by which, not by whom, all things were made. The incarnation of the Logos is reduced to a mere inspi- ration of the divine wisdom, which filled the soul, and directed all the actions, of the man Jesus. Thus, after revolving round the theological cycle, we are surprised to find that the Sabellian ends where the Ebionite had begun ; and that the incomprehensible mystery, which excites our adoration, eludes our in- quiry." As drowning men grasp at straws, these early dis- putants seized the most fanciful resemblances to support their conflicting claims. Augustine consid- ered the creation of the world in six days as a proof of the trinity, because " six days is twice three." Ambrose argued that " Jesus appeared to be the son of a carpenter to signify that Christ the Son was the maker of all things. The Arians quoted the early fathers to prove that there was a time when the Son did not exist : but this idea was decided to be 122 Career of the God-Idea in History. heresy. Then arose the question, if Christ was co- eternal with God, how came he to say, " Of that hour knoweth no man ; no, not even the Son, but only the Father." This difficulty was removed by the Coun- cil of Chalcedon, which decided that Christ pos- sessed two perfectly harmonizing natures, the divine and the human. As God, he knew everything ; but, as a man, many things were concealed from him. The ancient unbelievers in the divinity of Christ continually asked why the prophets and apostles, or Christ himself, had not spoken definitely on the trinity ; and why he only made the most vague allu- sions to it. Some of the fathers replied, it was on account of the material tendency of the Jews ; and others, that it was necessary to keep the Devil igno- rant of the fact Athanasius says, " that the apostles were ignorant of his being God ; " and Chrysostom thought it ab- solutely necessary for them to have been ignorant. All the fathers agree that for this design it was ne- cessary for Mary to have a nominal husband. They seized the Egyptian mystical numbers as proof. The number three, the Deity in his com- pleteness. One of the most ancient symbols in Egypt and Hindostan, of the Infinite, was a triangle with an eye in the centre. The Hindoos represent their three great gods by an image with three faces. The Cabalists expressed the idea of Plato in Hebrew style by Jehovah, the wisdom of Jehovah, and the habitation of Jehovah. In all countries, philosophers Speculations of Origen. 123 and mystics have yielded ascent to the idea that God was one in three. The Arians, followers of the great and exemplary Arius, believed, either without reserve or according to the Scriptures, that the Son differed from all other creatures, and was similar only to the Father. But he denied that he was of the same or similar sub- stance. The dispute between the Athanasians and Arians was not an unity or trinity, so much as the word " substance," and other verbal distinctions. But these were sufficient cause for endless dispute, and the life of Athanasius was consumed in his opposition to the madness of Arius and the promulgation of a doctrine eventually to triumph. Origen acknowledged a personal God, within whose consciousness all things that exist are em- braced ; who created by the exercise of his will. The Logos was to the Father what reason is in man. He was the concentration of the glory of God, reflected from thence to the world of spirit ; the agent employed in creating the world ; the truth, the wisdom. The Holy Spirit was the divine energy of Deity : with the Son it was as much exalt- ed above all other spiritual existences as the Father was above them. He considered Christ a perfect man with a rational soul, a sensitive soul, and a body like other men. The Logos united himself with Christ's rational soul. By this means the Logos came into communication with the sensuous nature, and Christ received divine power. The Holy Spirit descended on Christ at his baptism. 124 Career of the God-Idea in History. The minds of the early converts were prepared by their Pagan beliefs to receive the doctrine of the incarnation of Christ. They believed that the spirits of sages and heroes watched over the welfare of their favorite people, and hence their deification. That these spirits could return and become incar- nated was also universally received. The incarnation was not of doubtful solution, but its manner in this particular instance became as dif- ficult of solution as the trinity itself. The Ebion- ites were deeply imbued with the material ideas of the Jews in regard to a temporal Messiah. They could not invest the son of a carpenter with divin- ity. If, as some supposed, he was an offspring of a virgin and the Holy Ghost, then, with faculties en- larged by the Father to meet every requirement, he was super-mortal. But those who had conversed with Christ as with a friend, had seen him mature from infancy, could not free themselves from the prejudice of their senses, which declared him like other men. When the doctrine of his divinity was transplanted from the sterile soil of Syria to Rome, where men had not come in direct contact with Christ or his apostles, it met a ready acceptance. The philoso- phers of that age were accustomed to contemplate a long succession, an infinite chain, of angels or dei- ties, as emanations from the eternal. The incarna- tion of a god was not out of the supposed order. They were prepared to receive the doctrine of a new and recent advent of the Logos. They were too Repugnance to Matter. 125 deeply impressed with the inherent corruption of matter to suppose the pure spirit could come in di- rect contact with it. They sacrificed the humanity of Christ to his divinity. While his blood was still recent on Calvary, the Dqcetes, a numerous and learned sect of Asiatics, broached the system which afterwards became famous under the various names of the Gnostic sects. They summarily denied all those parts of the gospel relating to the birth and youth of Christ, claiming that he first appeared on the banks of the Jordan in perfect manhood, but in appearance only. He was an illusion created by the hand of the Omnipotent. The rage of the Jews was wasted on a phantom. Their Jehovah became trans- formed by the Gnostics into a rebellious and igno- rant spirit ; and the son of God came to overthrow his power. The Armenians still retain this belief, holding that the manhood only of Christ existed without creation of a divine substance. The religious feelings of the East connected moral with spiritual ideas, and regarded spirit as essentially pure and divine, while matter was inherently corrupt and evil. Christianity first came in conflict with Orientalism at Ephesus, which, working insidiously into its structure, threatened to entirely subvert its design. Of these opponents, Cerinthus, placed on the con- fines of the Jewish and Gentile worlds, the first who admitted the tenets of Christianity, strove to recon- cile Gnosticism with the Ebionite faith, or Chris- tianity with Oriental mysticism. Christ he believed 126 Career of the God-Idea in History. to be of a higher order than those secondary and subordinate beings who presided over the older world. The Father could not be contaminated by contact with matter necessitated to a mortal birth and death. The visible Christ was flesh and blood. He consid- ered him the son of Joseph and Mary ; human, but the last of his race, to restore the worship of the true and Supreme Deity at his baptism in the Jordan. The Christ, the first of the eons, the son of God himself, descended, in the form of a dove, to inhabit his mind, and direct his actions for the allotted space of his ministry. The Christ left the solitary Jesus alone to suffer the agony of the cross. The taunts called forth by this ingratitude were variously met. It was said, Jesus, being human, deserved to suffer ; that he would be fully repaid, and that he was ren- dered insensible to pain. The body and the spirit furnish a type of that more imposing union by a divine power with a body. There is nothing contradictory in the doctrine of in- carnation, but the consequences of its admission were dangerous to opposers of Arianism. It did not accord with their sublime theology to acknowledge that God himself was manifested in the flesh, matur- ing in foetal growth through manhood, scourged, crucified, felt the mortal agony, and expired. Apol- lonius met the issue fairly, and admitted in full its broadest consequences. He uttered the memorable words, still heard in theological warfare, "One in- carnate nature of Christ." Speculations of Gnosticism. 127 But his heresies, and those of the Ebionites and Docetes, were proscribed ; and the double nature, as taught by Cerinthus, was modified and received, fashioned as it is at the present day, the substan- tial, indissoluble^ union of a perfect God with a per- fect man. In the second century, these doctrines, under the name of Gnosticism, had matured, and divided the believers in Christianity, and its dogmas have never lost the tinge it gave them. Its tenets were sublime and imposing. The primal Deity remained aloof in inapproachable majesty. He was the unspeakable, the infinite. The fullness of the godhead, the Ple- roma, expanded in ever-enlarging circles until it em- braced the universe. From this Pleroma sprang all spiritual beings, and back to it they would all return. By their entanglement with vile and degrading mat- ter, evil existed, and all outward existence had become degraded. To restore them again unsullied to the bosom of the Deity, freed from the stain of matter, was the mission of Christ. Pushing these fancies to their consequences, they were compelled to reject the Jewish Jehovah, who could not be the father, but must be some inferior God. He was left undis- turbed to the Jew. To them, Christ revealed a De- ity hitherto unknown in a world the creation of an inferior being. The whole school of Gnostics were perplexed at the human nature of Christ. They seized on the distinctiveness of his divine and hu- man natures. Even the virginity of his mother pol- luted him, and the union was offensive to them. 128 Career of the God-Idea in History. They escaped by suffering : the divine came down on the man Jesus at his baptism, and ascended after his death. The Christ whom men saw was but a phantom. Influenced by the spirit of Gnosticism, Celsus, supposed to have been an Epicurean philosopher, living towards the close of the second century, urged many cogent reasons against the Christian's ideas of divinity. The pictures they drew of God's vengeance were, to him, very offensive ; for the philosophers de- lighted to represent the Supreme as incapable of mor- tal passions. Nor could he be reconciled with the idea that the Logos could have been born of woman. He also objected to the pure anthropomorphic idea of creation entertained by the Church : " It is not for man, more than for lions and eagles, that every- thing was created. It was in order that the world, as the work of God, might present a perfect whole. God provides only for the whole ; and that his prov- idence never deserts. This world never becomes worse. God does not return to it after a long inter- val. He is as little angry with man as with apes and flies. The universe has been provided, once for all, with all the powers necessary for its preservation, and for developing itself after the same laws. God has not, like a human architect, so executed his work that at some future period it would need to be repaired." He placed the Supreme Being above the world and all created things, and regarded the worship of different gods as only the varying expression of the Origin of the Holy Ghost. 129 same worship. " The unity of the Supreme Be- ing remains, even if it be admitted that each na- tion has its gods, whom it must worship in a certain manner, according to its peculiar charac- ter; and the worship of all these different dei- ties is reflected back to the Supreme God, who has appointed them, as it were, his delegates and representatives. Those who argue that men ought not to serve many masters, impute human weakness to God. He is not jealous of the adora- tion paid to subordinate deities. His nature is su- perior to degradation and insult. Reason itself might justify the belief in the inferior deities, the objects of established worship. For, since the Su- preme Being can only produce that which is immor- tal and imperishable, the existence of mortal beings cannot be explained unless we distinguish from him those inferior deities, and suppose them to be the creators of mortal beings and of perishable things." Some difficulty was encountered in the evolution of the Holy Ghost ; and, with the difficulty, its seem- ing importance grew in tenfold ratio. Did it origi- nate with the Father or Son ? This was a vexed question with the early converts. It could not come from the Father ; for in that case the Logos and Spirit would be brothers, and it was affirmed that the Logos was the only-begotten. But to have it pro- ceed from the Son would make God its grandfather. Nevertheless a sect was established on the last hy- pothesis. Ambrose thus decides the query satisfactorily to 9 1 30 Career of the God-Idea in History. himself: "The holy individual trinity never does anything separately. The Father, the Son, and the Spirit created the body of Christ. The Father, be- cause it is said, " God sent his Son made of a wo- man ; the Son, because it is said, " Wisdom has builded her house ; " the Spirit, because " Mary was with child by a Spirit." That the spirit was a per- sonality, was considered fully proved by its taking on the form of a dove at the baptism of Christ. Endless theological discussions occurred and end- ed in still more completely befogging the disputants, who wandered over the trackless desert in an ever- returning circle. The 'cradle of churchianity was rocked by these childish disputations, which were simply a war of words, enlivened by the phantom of ideas. After centuries of angry combat, not always con- fined to words, and the repeated resolutions of coun- cils, the Platonic trinity became the Orthodox creed : as might have been predicted from the first ; for, granting the premises, it was the only logical solution of the incomprehensible problem. VII. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE LATER PHILOSOPHERS. There is one God. MOHAMMED. God is Love. JESUS. The great Positive Mind of the universe, Father God and Mother Na- ture. A. J. DAVIS. FROM the great struggle between Athanasius and Arius, the ascendency of the former, and triumph of the mysterious doctrine of the trinity, to the present, little advance has been made in the development of the god-idea. As established by the early Catholic councils, it has descended unchanged. The history of its career would be a barren and tedious repetition of unintelligible formulas and un- meaning distinctions. Whenever a belief becomes a creed, and that creed sacred and infallible, there is an end to progress. During this bleak interval outside of the Church, a few thinkers have endeav- ored to gain the truth, but they have generally made the attempt entirely independent of estab- lished beliefs. Previous to the revival of learning in Europe, or for the space of the whole millennium, the question was discussed theologically, and the chatter of a flock of jays would be as interesting and quite as intelligible. 132 Career of the God-Idea in History. With the revival of learning, really great and earnest thinkers, though treating it in a metaphysical manner, explored its profound depths, and exhausted an amount of labor and research that in any other field would have been richly rewarded. Giardino Bruno taught a pure Pantheism, and no- bly met the flames prepared by an enraged priest- hood, who sought to blot out his truths with his life's blood. God to him was the infinite intelligence, the cause of causes, the principle of all life and mind ; the great activity, whose action we name the universe. But God did not create the universe : he informed it with life, with being. He is the universe ; but only as the cause is the effect, sustaining it, causing \\., but not limited by it. He is self-existing, yet so essen- tially active as incessantly to manifest himself as a cause. Between the Supreme Being, and the infe- rior beings dependent upon him, there is this dis- tinction : He is absolutely simple, without parts ; he is one whole, identical and universal : whereas the others are mere individual parts, distinct from the great whole. Above and beyond the visible universe there is an infinite invisible, an immova- ble, unalterable identity, which rules over all diver- sity. This being of beings, this unity of unities, is God : " Deus est monadum monas, nempe entium en- titas" ^ Bruno says, that, although it is impossible to conceive nature separated from God, we can con- ceive God separated from nature. The Infinite Be- Speculations of Bruno. 133 ing is the essential centre and substance of the uni- \ verse, but he is above the -essence and substance of all things : he is superessentialis, supersubstantialis. / Thus we cannot conceive a thought independent of a mind, but we can conceive a mind apart from any one thought. The universe is a thought of God's\v mind: nay, more, it is the infinite activity of his J^ mind. To suppose the world finite is to limit his power. " Wherefore should we imagine that the di- vine activity (la divina efficacia) is idle ? Wherefore should we say that the divine goodness, which can communicate itself ad infinitum, and infinitely dif- fuse itself, is willing to restrict itself? Why should his infinite capacity be frustrated, defrauded of its possibility to create infinite worlds ? And why should we deface the excellence of the divine image, which should rather reflect itself in an infinite mir- ror, as his nature is infinite and immense ? " * Descartes' demonstration of the existence of God has become famous. It is thus presented in the form of a syllogism. All that we clearly and distinctly conceive as con- tained in anything is true of that thing, f Now we conceive clearly and distinctly, that the~\ . existence of God is contained in the idea we have \ ' of him. Ergo, God exists. This may satisfy a metaphysician, but it has no positive element of certainty. Spinoza arose from the study of Descartes, and, looking at nature, asked * Del' Infinite, opp. Ital. ii. 24. f Lewes. 1 34 Career of the God-Idea in History. what meant the ever-flowing tide of change. It was all phenomenal, depending on external change or the state of the perceiving mind. Under the phe- nomena, must be a noumenon. The reality of all ex- istence is substance ; not gross materiality, but the substance which stands under all things. What this substance is of itself, we can never know, because to know it would be to bring it under forms and conditions of the mind, and thus make it a phenom- ena. SPINOZA, while admitting an intelligence acting in and forming a part of matter, supposed that it was neither thought nor extent exclusively of each other, although both were its necessary attributes. Descartes, in common with most philosophers, as- sumed a duality, God, and a world created by God. Spinoza affirmed that extension and thought were only attributes of matter, and by subtile sympathies reduced the duality to a unity, an infinite one. God is the absolute substance. From him arises all existence. He is the fountain from which flows the endless successions of living forms. The uni- verse is a simple manifestation. The finite reposes on the bosom of the Infinite. There is but one re- ality, and that is God. Lewes thus laconically presents the Spinozian speculations on God. There is but one infinite substance, and that is God. Whatever is, is in God ; and, without him, nothing can be conceived. He is the universal be- ing, of which all things are the manifestations. He Speculations of Spinoza. 135 is the sole substance : everything else is a mode ; yet, without substance, mode cannot exist. God, viewed under the attributes of infinite substance, is the nat- ura naturans : viewed as a manifestation, as the modes under which his attributes appear, he is the natura naturata. He is the cause of all things ; and that immanently, but not transiently. He has two infinite attributes, extension and thought. Exten- sion is visible thought, and thought is invisible ex- tension : they are the objective and subjective of which God is the identity. Every thing is a mode of God's attribute of extension ; every thought, wish, or feeling, a mode of his attribute of thought. That extension and thought are not substances, as Des- cartes maintained, is obvious from this : that they are not conceived per se, but per aliud. Something is extended : what is ? Not the extension itself, but something prior to it ; viz., substance. Substance is uncreated, but creates by the internal necessity of its nature. There may be many existing thingsf-x, but only one existence ; many forms, but only one substance. God is the idea immanens, the one and all. Spinoza has been charged with atheism by those who misunderstood his obscure sentences, and he was compelled to suffer persecutions for ideas which would have met a better fate had they been clearly expressed. His profession of faith reads like that of Fenelon, rather than of the cold atheistical philoso- pher : " If I also concluded that the idea of God, com- 136 Career of the God-Idea in History. prised in that of the infinity of the universe, released one from obedience, love, and worship, I should make a still more pernicious use of my reason ; for it is evident to me that the laws which I have received, not by the relation or intervention of other men, but immediately from him, are those which the light of nature points out to me as the true guides of a ra- tional conduct. If I failed in obedience in this par- ticular, I should sin, not only against the principle of my being, and the society of any kind, but also against myself, in depriving myself of the most solid advantage of my existence." " With regard to the love of God, so, I conceive, is this idea from tending to weaken it, that it is more calculated to increase it, since, through it, I know that God is intimate with my being ; that he gives me existence and my every property : but he gives them liberally, without reproach, without interest, without subjecting me to anything but my own na- ture. It banishes fear, weariness, distrust, and all the effects of a vulgar and interested love. It in- forms me, that this is a good which I cannot lose, and which I possess the more fully as I know and love it." It may be placed with the singular freaks of hu- man judgment, that, with this refined idea of every- thing being an extension of God, Spinoza rejected the doctrine of final causes. Perhaps on this ac- count he received the designation of an atheist. Schelling thought the whole value of science was in its speculations, meaning by that term the con- Schelling and Fichte. 137 templation of God as he exists. Reason, inasmuch as it affirms God, cannot affirm anything else, and annihilates itself at the same time as an individual existence as anything out of God. Thought is not any thought, and being is not any being ; for every- thing belongs to God or the all. If nothing exists\ out of God, then must the knowledge of God be only the infinite knowledge which God has of himself in , the eternal self-affirmation. God is not the highest, but the only one. He is not to be viewed as the summit or the end ; but as the centre, as the all in all. Consequently there is no such thing as be- ing lifted up to the knowledge of God ; but the knowledge is immediate recognition. * Fichte rejected design. He rejected the world as the objective existence of the Ego ; and in that man- ner we are, ourselves, creators of it. Design being applicable to finite things is wholly inapplicable to the infinite. " God," says Fichte, " must be believed in, not in- ferred. Faith is the ground of all conviction, scien- tific or moral. Why do you believe in the existence of the world ? It is nothing more than the incarna- tion of that which you carry within you, yet you believe in it. In the same way God exists in your consciousness, and you believe in him. He is the moral order of the world : as such, we can know him, and only be as such. For, if we attempt to attribute to him intelligence or personality, we at once neces- sarily fall into anthropomorphism. God is infinite ; * Jahrbucher der Medicin. Quoted by Lewes. T 38 Career of the God-Idea in History. therefore beyond the reach of our science, which can only embrace the finite, but not beyond our faith." We realize God by doing our duty. True religion is the realization of the universal reason. If we had perfect liberty, we should be one. If we had the same conditions, we should be one in thought, there would be but one will, and perfect harmony. * This grand result should be the aim of mankind. Hegel, in his " Philosophy of Religion," applies his method to the solution of the problem of the nature of God. He accepts the trinity, with his interpre- tation. God the Father is the eternal idea, or un- conditioned abstraction ; God the Son, engendered by the father, is a conditioned reality ; " God the Holy Ghost is the identity of the two, the negation of the negation and perfect totality of existence." God the Father existed before the world, and created it. He created it because it is the essence of his being to create. He creates not by an act, but an eternal moment : he is forever creating. It is through crea- tion that the abstraction passes into activity. It is the realization of God. Voltaire affirmed that the knowledge of a God was not impressed upon us by the hand of nature, else we should all have the same idea. This knowledge does not come like our perceptions of light, or the earth, which we receive as soon as our understand- ings are awakened ; nor is it a philosophical idea, * Sittenlehre. Gerichtliche Verautwortung ss chriften ge- gen die Auklage des Atheismus. Voltaire on a Final Cause. 139 for men believe in a God before they become phi- losophers. The idea is derived from that natural logic which is met with among the rudest of mankind. Our idea of divinity is wholly inadequate ; and, as we pass from conjecture to conjecture, we find few certainties. " There is something : therefore there is something eternal, for nothing is produced from nothing. Here is a certain truth on which the mind reposes. Every work which shows us means and an end announces a workman : then this universe, com- posed of springs, of means, each of which has its end, discerns a most mighty, a most intelligent work- man. Here is a probability approaching- the great- est certainty." While Voltaire was thus easily satisfied with the reasoning fully developed by Paley, that of a final cause, he could not believe this being capable of cre- ating matter, and quoted the Grecian philosophers to sustain his position. But here arose an unfortu- nate dilemma. If God and matter existed independ- ently, there are two necessary beings ; and, if there are two, there may be thirty. With this strange inference, he acknowledges, with Cicero, his own ignorance, and the vanity of the discussion. He could not understand how Spinoza could re- ject final causes. " If this infinite universal being thinks, must he not have design ? If he has design, must he not have a will ? Spinoza says, We are modes of that absolute, necessary, infinite being. I say to Spinoza, We will, and have designs, we who 1 40 Career of the God-Idea in History. are but modes ; therefore this infinite, necessary, absolute being cannot be deprived of them ; there- fore he has will, design, power." * Doubter as he was, he could not, as he declares, deny that the eye was made to see, the stomach to digest, etc. " For my part, I see in nature, as in the arts, only final causes ; and I believe that an ap- ple-tree is made to bear apples, as I believe that a watch is made to tell the hour." f Voltaire was unquestionably a great thinker, but he could not escape the ideas of his age. Had he known the wonderful developments of science made within the last fifty years, he might perhaps have had his implicit faith in the similarity of appearance shaken. There is not the remotest analogy between the apple-tree and a watch, between the design man- ifested in one and that of the other. Growth by natural laws and artificial construction have nothing in common, and their similarity is only superficial. A careful investigation of all Voltaire has said about God would lead us to conclude, that, after all, he refined God to "truth itself;" but the anecdote with which he illustrates his position leaves us un- decided, whether to believe him to have been a theist, or an .atheist whose theism was only as- sumed. " I had just built a closet at the end of my garden when I heard a mole arguing thus with an ant : " Here is a fine fabric," said the mole : " it must have been a very powerful mole that performed this *Phil. Die. ii. 381. fib. Failure of Voltaire. 141 work." " You jest," returned the ant : " the archi- tect of this edifice is an ant of mighty genius." With this seemingly close appreciation of the sit- uation, Voltaire consented to become like the ant or mole, and, when gazing over creation, see only the work of a final cause, and insult with satire, which came from the meanness of a narrow soul, those who did not receive it. Swedenborg, notwithstanding his illumination, ac- cepted the trinity in its grossest form. " The trinity, then, is in and from Jesus Christ, the new name of our God. The Father is his divine love ; the Son is his divine wisdom, that is to say, the divinely human form in which he is self-adapted to his creatures, or a personal God ; the Holy Spirit is the influence which he communicates to churches. This trinity is imaged in the soul, body, and operation of every man. The Father is inaccessible to us out of Christ, even as our own souls are not to be reached by others except through our bodies." The Father entered the world by real means, by the gates of generation, and became incarnate through the Vir- gin Mary. Every human soul experiences the same changes, and the end is the same, the passions are subdued by the trials of this life, and the pure divin- ity arises into the next life. The idea of God is thus expressed in the articles of faith of the New Church : " That Jehovah God is the creator and preserver of heaven and earth, is love itself, and wisdom itself, a God itself, and truth itself: that he is one both in essence and in person ; 142 Career of the God-Idea in History. in whom, nevertheless, is the divine trinity of Father ; Son, and Holy Spirit, which are the essential divin- ity, the divine humanity, and the divine proceeding, answering to the soul, the body, and the operative energy, in man ; and that the Lord and Saviour Je- sus Christ is that God." " Man, it is clear, must think of God as a man ; must think from his own experience towards divine virtues ; from his own deeds towards God's deeds, which are creation. The must in this case is a ne- cessity of our being ; which is the same thing as to say, that it is God's ordinance, and the true method. It is therefore a verity substantial as our souls ; nay, consubstantial with their Maker. No idealism then here intervenes ; but we touch the solidity of eternal truth, and in our minds and bodies we have an at- testation and vision of the Creator. But, if God be the infinite man, the universe which proceeds from him must represent man in an image, and all the creatures must likewise so represent. Mineral, vege- table, and animal forms, nay, atmospheres, planets, and suns, are then nothing less than so many means and tendencies to man, on different stages of the transit ; and finite man resumes them all, proclaims visibly their end, and may connect them with their fountain. It is throughout a system of correspond- ences, all depending upon the activity of a personal God, as the substance of the latter depends upon the intervention of God in history, as Jesus Christ. Re- move from the centre of the system the position that God is a man, and he becomes necessarily unintelli- Speculations of Swedenborg. . 143 gible to mankind. He has made them think of him otherwise than he is. They communicate with him by no religion ; but the beginning of their knowledge is darkness, its object a mere notion, and their love falls into a void, there is, in short, no correspondence be- tween the Creator and any creature. Maintain, how- ever, that master position ; and humanity is the way to the divine humanity, the high road of the living truth. " The path by which God passes through heaven into nature is laid down in distinct degrees, and ' the doctrine of degrees' furnishes a principal interest with Swedenborg in these elucidations. Degrees are the separate steps of forms or substances, the measured walk of the creative forces. Thus the will in one degree is the understanding in the next, and the body in the third ; the animal in the highest is the vegetable in the second, and the mineral in the lowest ; and all these are one, like soul and body, and are united, and each uses the lower, by the han- dles of its harmony with inferior utilities, just as a man is united with, and makes use of, the various instruments which extend the powers of his mind and arms through nature. The world, therefore, is full of interval and freedom ; and in the movements of each creature, whereby it lays hold of whatever supports it, the whole becomes actively one, and marches forward in the realms of use, where it meets the omnipotent again." Thus traversing the gulf of almost two millenni- ums, bridged as it were by the great thinkers, we 1 44 Career of the God-Idea in History. find, that, after bestowing their best thoughts on the subject, they have arrived at no satisfactory results ; not even satisfied themselves. The doctrines which the Church is supposed to receive with unquestioning faith were once in the most unsettled state ; and not by reason, but by the arbitrary decrees of councils and synods, often meet- ing with drawn swords, were their inspired character determined. VIII. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE BIBLE. WHITHER shall I go from thy spirit ? or whither shall I flee from thy pres- ence ? If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there. If I make my bed in hell, behold thou art there. Through God we shall do valiantly : for he it is that shall tread down our enemies. PSALMS. For in him we live, move, and have our being. PAUL. THE necessity for a divine revelation is supposed to exist on account of the fallen and corrupt condition of mankind. * If this revelation super- sedes reason and nature, and flows from an infalli- ble source, it must present a perfect view of the di- vine Being. If we examine it critically, in the same unprejudiced manner that we do any other book, we shall find that such is not the fact. It bears the un- mistakable evidence of human origin. If God gave a revelation to Moses, and another to Paul, he would represent himself the same in both. The Bible should be a unit throughout, although its inspired writers were scattered over a thousand years. We find, sad fact, the very reverse. It is a book com- posed of many fragments ; and each of these con- tains, not the absolute view of God, but the writer's * Diet, of Bible, by Rev. John Brown. Edinburgh. 293. 1 46 Career of the God-Idea in History. ideas of God. Man changes ; the ages come and go, bringing new ideas : but God is eternal. The rude Israelites in the wilderness, and the disciples, thought far differently from each other. They wrote differ- ently. Hence the Bible is contradictory ; and, if we ask it to give us the character and attributes of God, it gives him the most diverse and conflicting attri- butes. If called on to decide the unity or trinity of the Godhead, it yields many texts for both, though more strongly favoring the latter. He is repre- sented as satisfied with his works, and as dissatis- fied ; * as dwelling in temples, and as not : f as dwell- ing in light, and in darkness : $ as seen and heard, and as impossible to be seen or heard : as being weary, and resting ; and as never requiring rest : || as being omnipresent and all-knowing, and as limited in presence and knowledge : ^[ as being all-powerful, and the reverse:** as changeable, and unchangeable : |f as just and impartial, and unjust and partial : \\ as the author of evil, and as not the author : as war- like, and as peaceful : || j| as cruel, unmerciful, destruc- * Compare Gen. i. 31, with Gen. vi. 6. f Comp. 2 Chr. vii. 12, with Acts vii. 48. i Comp. i Tim. vi. 16, with I Kings viii. 12. Comp. Ex. xxxiii. u, with John i. 18. || Comp. Ex. xxxi. 17, with Is. xl. 28. IT Comp. Prov. xv. 3, Job xxxiv. 22, with Gen. xviii. 20, 21, Gen. Hi. 8. ** Comp. Matt. xix. 26, with Judges i. 19. ft Comp. Gen. vi. 6, with Sam. i. 17. %% Comp. Deut. xxxii. 4, with Sam. ix. 25, and Matt. xiii. 12. Comp. Is. xlv. 7, with i Cor. xiv. 33. UK Comp. Ex. xv. 3, with Rom. xv. 33. God of the Bible. 147 tive, and ferocious ; and as kind, merciful, and good : * as being vindictively angry and unforgiving, and as merciful, f With true heathen relish, he is described as de- lighting in burnt-offerings, sacrifices, and the observ- ance of holy days ; and .again, when a sudden gleam of spirituality pierces the darkness, as disapproving all of these : $ as accepting human sacrifice, and for- bidding it : he is also described as tempting man, as lying and deceiving ; and again as neither lying nor deceiving. || The unity and plurality of gods are both indorsed by the Bible. ^[ The Creator, repre- sented as the author of all things, is an eternal spir- it, infinite, omnipresent, ** almighty, perfectly good, merciful sincere, faithful ; who upholds and governs all things, good or bad. It shows us that this Crea- tor subsists, of his own simple and undivided essence, in three distinct persons, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost ; " the same in substance, and equal in all divine power and glory." The Father is the true God, that from eternity be- gat his only son, ff consulted with and fore-ordained * Comp. Jer. xiii. 14, with Sam. v. II. f Comp. Jer. xvii. 4, with Ps. ciii. 8. i Comp. Ex. xxix. 36, Lev. xxiii. 27, i. 9, with Jer. vi. 20, Ps. v. 13, 14, Is. i. 13. Comp. 2 Sam. xxi. 8, 9, 14, Judg. xi. 30-39, with Deut. xii. 30, 31. || Comp. Gen. xxii. I, I Kings xxii. 23, with Heb. vi. 18, James i. 13. T[ Deut. vi. 4, Gen. i. 26, i John v. 7. ** Job xi. 7. ft Ps. ii. 7- 148 Career of the God-Idea in History. him before the foundation of the world. He sent him into the world,* supported him through his earthly struggle, speaking in and working through him, f gave him up to death, and raised him from the dead, and crowned and gave him all power in heaven. The Son is equal to the Father as a person, \ but one in essence. He is called God, the only god, the King of kings, and Lord of lords ; and all the di- vine attributes of omnipotence, omnipresence, and unchangeableness, are ascribed to him. Though, as son, he is equal to the Father, through his human nature, as mediator, he is inferior. In that state, he undertakes to pay our debts, and ful- fills the obligation. He is the husband, shepherd, friend, and physician, the all-in-all, to his people. Christ is God and man, united so as to enable him to be a true mediator between the infinite and finite. The Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and Son. || He is omnisicent, omnipresent, and al- mighty, ^f He is recognized, not as an energy, but as a person, reproving, executing, and being grieved. Such is the trinity as recorded in the Bible, and received by all Orthodox Christians. Its mystery they do not attempt to solve ; but receive it with a blind, uncriticising faith. * Luke i. 35. f John v. 19-22. % Zech. xiii. 7. .Matt. xviii. 20, xxviii. 20, Phil. iii. 21, Heb. xiii. 8. || John xv. 26. H i Cor. ii. 10, 11, Eph. ii. 17, 18, Luke i. 35. God of the Bible. 149 But the Unitarians claim the Bible furnishes ab- solute proof that God is one. Christ is the son of God, and the Holy Ghost is the power and divine in- fluence of God. They hold that the early fathers for the first three centuries were on their side, and that the Bible has received its trinitarian cast from con- tact with pagan philosophy. Justin Martyr, the most distinguished and the earliest writer next to the apostles, says, " We wor- ship God the maker of the universe, offering up to him prayers and thanks. But assigning to Jesus, who came to teach us these things, and for this end was born, the ' second place ' after God, we not with- out reason honor him." From the beginning to the present, the discussion of the unity and trinity of the Godhead has more or less disturbed the quiet of the church ; and there is now a gradual movement, through Unitarianism, to- wards a more reasonable, not to say understandable, view of Divinity. The God-idea of the Bible would not be complete were the Devil omitted. That personage fills a most important position, by solving the problem of the existence of evil. The scheme would be im- perfect without him. The belief in his existence is passing away, but his name cannot be blotted from the pages of Scripture. It remains as a remnant of the influence of Persia and Assyria on the Hebrew mind. The Bible recognizes the duality in nature, the good and the evil deities ; and Lucifer, fallen as he is, is believed by the Orthodox and Catholic 1 50 Career of the God-Idea in History. world to be the stronger, if the number of souls he leads be a sign of power. The Biblical idea of God is anthropomorphic. By placing Christ as a mediator, it is intensely so. The Jewish idea recorded in the Old Testament is dis- gustingly tainted with this belief. God, through human nature, sacrificed for man, is the same in Crishna and in Christ. The human mind, weary with contemplation of infinity, seeks the divine man, and deifies ideal human nature. We again have come to the same result. The study of the Bible brings us to the same point we reached in our investigation of the doctrines flowing from the Shaster and Zendavesta. Human nature returns to itself. The God at last is only a man. Afar off, he looked huge and un- real ; near, and he dwarfs to human size. IX. THE GOD-IDEA OF THE BORDER-RELIGIONS, CHI- NESE, DRUIDS, SCANDINAVIANS, AND AZTECS. GOD resides in the heart of all creatures. MAHABHARATA. Talk, talk much as you please ; but who, what made and governs those unnumbered worlds that pasture in the illimitable fields of heaven ? NAPOLEON. r I A HERE are great religions which have sprung -1- up, and swayed the destinies of millions, seem- ingly isolated, and having no historical connection or relation to our own. In all of them, however, we can trace the same human elements, the same strug- gle for knowledge, and in their successes and fail- ures learn the unity of human intellect and circum- stances in all ages and races. The numbers who embrace a religion prove noth- ing. A million men are as liable to receive a false idea as one : the only necessity is, that that idea be on their plane of understanding. If numbers prove anything, the Christian religion is false : for it has never been received except by a moiety of mankind ; while Buddhism and Moslemism have been received by hundreds of millions, undisputed from generation to generation. The almost innumerable population of China hold 152 Career of the God-Idea in History. to crude and erroneous notions, and vigilantly defend them against every innovation, refusing even to examine any other system ; but their rever- ence for them, because taught twenty-five hundred years ago by Confucius, proves as little as the obe- dience of the urchin proves the truthfulness of the command he obeys. As a rule applying to the past, the more followers a system has, the greater proba- bility that it is false ; and another equally applicable is, that, the older an idea is, the greater the probabil- ity that it is false. These startling propositions are proved by an ex- amination of some of the outlying religions of the pagan world. The most notable of these forms of belief are the Druidic, Scandinavian, Chinese, and Aztec. Though it is very easy to decide the religious forms and ceremonies of a people, to seize on their peculiar ideas, for the moment taking their place, and receiving thoughts as fashioned by their train, is a most difficult achievement. The civilized man judges all opinions and policies, found among the di- verse race of the globe, by his own standard ; a method most unjust and objectionable. Every race of people have ethical systems, grow- ing out of their own wants and desires ; good for them, though possibly bad for others. The Chinese un- doubtedly would form as unfavorable an opinion of our religious system as we do of theirs. Of their system the most that can be said is that it is nega- tive. The active impassioned religious sentiment God-Idea of the Chinese. 153 of the West is unknown to the celestials. The cere- monial is nine-tenths of their religion. They fur- nish almost the only example of a people who have never offered human sacrifice ; nor have they ever personified or deified any of the vices or passions, like the ancient Greeks and Romans. Their mythol- ogy is far from those tales of loves and hates of the gods by which the latter brought their deities down to the sphere of humanity. Because of this deficiency, no hierarchy has ever been able to rise to the power and influence of a caste, as in India, although Budhists and Rationalists have been patronized and admitted into imperial confidence.* There is a state religion which from remote antiquity has undergone little change ; which consists, not of dogmas and doctrines to be learned and believed, but in rites and ceremonies, f The ob- jects of state worship are chiefly things, although persons are sometimes included. There are three grades of sacrifice, the great, medium, and inferior. The great sacrifices are applied to four objects only, the heavens or sky, the earth, the great temple of ancestors, and the gods of the land and grain, the special patrons of each dynasty. The medium are offered to the sun, moon, the names of emperors, Confucius, the gods of heaven and earth, and the passing year. The inferior are offered to the an- cient patron of the healing art, innumerable spirits of eminent departed men, the elements, rivers, moun- tains, etc. * The Middle Kingdom. Williams. f Dr. Morrison. 154 Career of the God-Idea in History. The emperor performs the ceremonial worship of the four superior objects, as Pontifex Maximus, as- sisted by members of the imperial clan and the board of rites. The hierophants are required to pre- pare themselves for the occasion by fasting ; ablution ; change of garments ; separation from their wives, all pleasurable scenes, and the dead : " for sickness and death defile ; while banqueting dissipates the mind, and unfits it for holding communication with the gods." The sacrifices consist of calves, bullocks, sheep, pigs, and the offerings of silks. The flesh- offering is usually cooked before being placed on the altar. Severe penalties are annexed to any infor- mality or neglect, and still heavier to the common people should they state their wants to the four su- perior objects of imperial adoration. The vulgar may worship as they please ; but, if they join in the worship of the son of heaven, death is their punish- ment. This worship is supposed to be the concrete ex- pression of the early worship of the universe. By the adoration of the heavens, the earth, and terres- trial gods, they sought to include and propitiate all superior powers. The original idea of a supreme in- telligence, or Shangti, seems to have been lost. The state religion of China is only a mere pageant : all its members, however, are learned men, disciples of Confucius, or the Ju kian. These have no tem- ples, priests, or creed, in the common acceptation of the term ; and hence worship at the Buddhist shrines, with the Rationalists, or even with the Romanists, Speculations of Chu Hi. 155 without losing connection with their countrymen. The influence of Confucius was momentous on the intellectual development of his countrymen ; but he was not a religious teacher in any sense of the word. Although he believed himself commissioned to re- store a better state, he never taught the duty of man to any higher power than the head of a family or state. He said he did not comprehend the myste- rious ways of the gods, and that the duty of man lay in fulfilling his obligations to his relations and soci- ety rather than worshiping unknown spirits. " Not knowing even life, how can we know death ? " When dying, his disciples asked to whom they should sacrifice : he nobly answered, " I have already wor- shiped," giving utterance to the grand truth that a well-ordered life is the best offering man can render the Infinite. The great metaphysician of China is Chu Hi, only surpassed by Confucius in influence. This philoso- pher, perhaps partially acquainted with the specula- tions of India, resolved the obscure references to Shangti, in the Shu King, into pure materialism ; making nature the first principle, which, by operat- ing on itself, evolves the dual powers Yin and Yang. The method of this celestial metaphysician can be best seen by a quotation, in which his system is ex- pressed. It is an interesting fact, that, adopting a similar method as the Western sages, he wanders for a time in the same fog of uncertainties, and draws his conclusions in the same positive manner. Many 156 Career of the God-Idea in History. of his propositions would not discredit the finest in- tellects of the West. " Under the whole heaven there is no primary matter (li) without the immaterial principle (kt), and no immaterial principle apart from the primary mat- ter. Subsequent to the existence of the immaterial principle is produced primary matter, which is dedu- cible from the axiom that the one male and the one female principle of nature may be denominated tau or logos (the active principle from which all things emanate) : thus nature is spontaneously possessed of benevolence and righteousness (which are inclu- ded in the idea of tau) " First of all existed tien li (the celestial principle or soul of the universe), and then came primary mat- ter: primary matter accumulated constituted chih (body, substance, or the accidents and qualities of matter), and nature was arranged. " Should any ask whether the immaterial principle or primary matter existed first, I should say that the immaterial principle, on assuming a figure, ascended ; and primary matter, on assuming form, descended. When we come to speak of assuming form, and as- cending or descending, how can we divest ourselves of the idea of priority and subsequence ? When the immaterial principle does not assume a form, pri- mary matter then becomes coarse, and forms a sedi- ment. " Originally, however, no priority or subsequence can be predicated of the immaterial principle ; and yet, if you insist on carrying out the reasoning to the Speculations of Chu Hi. 157 question of their origin, then you must say that the immaterial principle has the priority. But it is not a separate and distinct thing: it is just contained in the centre of the primary matter, so that, were there no primary matter, then this immaterial principle would have no place of attachment. Primary mat- ter consists, in fact, of the four elements of metal, wood, water, and fire ; while the immaterial principle is no other than the four cardinal virtues of benevo- lence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom. . . . " Should any one ask for an explanation of the assertion that the immaterial has first existence, and after that comes primary matter, I say, it is not ne- cessary to speak thus : but, when we know that they are combined, is it that the immaterial principle holds the precedence, and the primary matter the subsequence ? or is that the immaterial principle is subsequent to the primary matter ? We cannot thus carry our reasoning : but, should we endeavor to form some idea of it, then we may suppose that the pri- mary matter relies on the immaterial principle to come into action ; and, wherever the primary matter is coagulated, there the immaterial principle is pres- ent. For the primary matter can concrete and co- agulate, act and do ; but the immaterial principle has neither will nor wish, plan nor operation ; but only where the primary matter is collected and coagulated then the immaterial principle is in the midst of it. Just as in nature, men and things, grass and trees, birds and beasts, in their propagation invariably re- quire seed, and certainly cannot without seed, from 1 58 Career of the God-Idea in History. nothingness, produce anything. All this, then, is the primary matter ; but the immaterial principle is mere- ly a pure, empty, wide-stretched void, without form or footstep, and incapable of action or creation : but the primary matter can ferment and coagulate, col- lect and produce things. . . . " Should any one ask, with regard to those ex- pressions, ' The Supreme Ruler confers the due me- dium on the people, and when Heaven is about to send down a great trust upon men, out of regard to the people it sets up princes over them ;' and ' Heaven, in producing things treats them according to their attainments, on those who do good, it sends down a hundred blessings, and, on those who do evil, a hundred calamities ; ' and, ' When Heaven is about to send down some uncommon calamity upon a generation, it first produces some uncom- mon genius to determine it,' do these and such like expressions imply that above the azure sky there is a Lord and Ruler who acts thus ? or is it still true that Heaven has no mind, and men only carry out their reasonings in this style ? I reply, these three things are but one idea : it is that the immaterial principle of order is thus. The primary matter in its evolutions hitherto, after one season of fullness, has experienced one of decay ; and, after a period of decline, it again flourishes, just as if things were going on in a circle. There never was a decay without a revival. " The great extreme (tai ki/i) is merely the imma- terial principle. It is not an independent separate The Great Extreme. 159 existence ; it is found in the male and female prin- ciples of nature, in the five elements, in all things : it is merely an immaterial principle, and, because of its extending to the extreme limit, is therefore called the great extreme. If it were not for it, heaven and earth would not have been set afloat. . . . From the time when the great extreme came into opera- tion, all things were produced by transformation. This one doctrine includes the whole : it was not be- cause this was first in existence, and then that ; but altogether there is only one great origin, which from the substance extends to the use, and from the sub- tle reaches to that which is manifest. Should one ask, ' Because all things partake of it, is the great extreme split up and divided ? ' I should reply, that originally there is only one great extreme (anima mundi} of which all things partake, so that each one is provided with a great extreme : just as the moon in the heavens is only one, and yet is dispersed over the hills and lakes, being seen from every place in succession ; still you cannot say that the moon is divided. " The great extreme has neither residence nor form nor place which you can assign to it. If you speak of it before its development, then previous to that emanation it was perfect stillness : motion and rest, with the male and female principles of nature, are only the embodiment and descent of this princi- ple. Motion is the motion of the great extreme, and rest is its rest ; but these same motion and rest are not to be considered the great extreme itself. ... 1 60 Career of the God-Idea in History. Should any one ask, ' What is the great extreme ? ' I should say, it is simply the principle of extreme goodness and extreme perfection. Every'man has a great extreme, everything has one ; that which Lao-tse called the great extreme is the exemplified virtue of everything that is extremely good and per- fect in heaven and earth, men and things. " The great extreme is simply the extreme point, beyond which one cannot go ; that which is most elevated, most mysterious, most subtle, and most di- vine, beyond which there is no passing. Lienki was afraid lest people should think that the great ex- treme possessed form, and therefore called it the boundless extreme, a principle centred in nothing, and having an infinite extent. ... It is the imma- terial principle of the two powers, the four forms, and the eight changes of nature : we cannot say that it does not exist, and yet no form