^^ 
 
 m\ 
 
 If ^ ' 
 
 S t 
 
THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 LOS ANGELES 
 

GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 AND OTHER STUDIES 
 
By the same Author 
 
 TWELVE SCOTS TRIALS 
 
 THE RIDDLE OF THE 
 
 RUTHVENS AND OTHER 
 
 STUDIES 
 
 III Ihe "Xotahle Trial" Spriefi' 
 DR PRITCHARD 
 DEACON BRODIE 
 CAPTAIX PORTEOUS 
 OSCAR SLATER 
 MRS M'LACHLAK 
 MARY BLANDY 
 P.IRKE AND HARE 
 
^t::^^^^ B^4^a^:^^s^. 
 
GLENGAIIilY S AVAY 
 
 AND OTIIKR STUDIES 
 
 BY 
 
 WILLIAM ROUGHEAD 
 
 AUTHOR OF 
 'TWELVE SCOTS TRIALS," "THK RIDnLE OF THE KUTHVE.NS," ETC. 
 
 With Nine Illustrations 
 
 I asked liini wliat might l)e his immediate 
 purpose, toucliing his future movements. He 
 answered, to go to sea again, in his old vocation. 
 — Herman Melville : Mohy-Dich, 
 
 EDTNBUR(JH 
 W. GREEN k SON, LIMITED 
 
 MCMXXTT 
 
PEIN-TKD IM GREAT BRITAIN BY 
 
 NKILL AND CO., LTD. 
 
 EDINBURGH 
 
h\RlS 
 
 To 
 HUGH WALPOLE 
 
 OLD LAMPS FOR NEW 
 
A PERSONAL PREFACE 
 
 rpiHERE is popular warrant for the belief that even of a 
 good thing we can have too nuicli, and this being my 
 third public appearance in the same role, the reader, how- 
 ever gentle, may be tempted to exclaim with the apocalyptic 
 martyrs, "How long?" But as in tins free and happy 
 country of ours the accused is no longer gagged, I claim 
 my statutory right to be heard in m}^ own defence. 
 
 In the last year of what has been termed on high official 
 authority the Bad Old World, my first volume of essays, 
 Twelve Scots Trials, saw the light. Greeted auspiciously, 
 they were doing as well as could be wished, and seemed 
 like to thrive, when their young promise was prematurely 
 blighted by the whirlwind of the Great AVar. After the 
 storm their youth was relatively renewed, and I am glad 
 to know that there is yet life in them. Juliet's brave pro- 
 nouncement touching the unimportance of a name has 
 passed into a proverb ; still, although a rose catalogued as 
 a cauliflower should lose nothing of its perfume, its appeal 
 to other than vegetarians would be largely nugatory. 
 Sharing as I do Mr. Shandy's opinion on the magic quality 
 residing in names, by which for weal or woe the fortunes of 
 their possessors are influenced, I luu'e always considered 
 that my venture suffered in its baptism, l^'or its title I, 
 though the only begetter of the contents, was not respon- 
 sible ; but I felt from the first, and experience has confirmed 
 the impression, that of those three fateful words two at 
 least were unhappily chosen. "Scots" tended to arouse 
 
viii A PERSONAL PREFACE 
 
 hereditary prejudice in such of "our auld enemies of 
 England " as might otherwise have been willing to lend 
 me an ear. '' Trials " suggested to the lay mind either the 
 bloomless technicalities of law reports or the raw and ribald 
 obscenities of the baser press. Had they been " a baker's 
 dozen " the game would have been up indeed. Upon the 
 first count, while I hold Scottish crime and our judicial 
 methods of dealing with it to be more dramatic and 
 picturesque — in both senses, more effective — than those 
 which obtain beyond the Border, I allow that my judgment 
 may not be free from patriotic bias. Upon the second, 
 while I admit to strict realism, I hope that the manner of 
 presentment is a redeeming feature. To an unwholesome 
 craving for " sensation " as such I have ever declined to 
 pander. They, the trials, were carefully culled as examples 
 from three centuries of Caledonian wickedness, and their 
 value resides in the light they cast upon the social history 
 of our race in its darker and less admirable aspects. The 
 repulsive blend of religious enthusiasm and abandoned 
 depravity observable in so many cases must, I fear, be 
 accepted as an unlovely national trait : one meets with It 
 again and again in studying our criminal annals. While 
 I acknowledge a general weakness for these black sheep 
 of mine, I regard Katharine Nairn as the flower of my 
 nefarious flock. She takes precedence, for me, of all her so 
 gifted sisters who have played their parts in the Justiciary 
 Opera, the unique performance of Madeleine Smith — our 
 20vima donna assoluta — alone excepted. The three bene- 
 ficiaries of the verdict Not Proven, selected as typical 
 instances of the abuse of that via media by incompetent 
 or feeble juries, have been to my surprise mistaken by some 
 reviewers for victims of our peculiar practice ! In these, 
 as elsewhere, I tried to state the facts impartially ; yet I 
 
A PERSONAL PREFACE ix 
 
 should have thoug-ht that here they spoke for themselves, 
 and that with no doubtful voice. The Dunecht and the 
 Arran cases were objected to as being essentially inadequate 
 to their striking and spectacular settings ; but for this, of 
 course, the narrator is in no wise to blame : it is not his 
 fault if criminals cannot always rise to the measure of their 
 opportunities. Not that I complain of criticism. No ; my 
 reviewers have ever tempered judgment with mercy, and 
 I am very sensible of their long-suffering. 
 
 The late Mr. Charles E. Green, whose firm in 1913 
 published my book, invited me to contribute to the 
 Juridical Revieiv, of wliicli he was then the editor, a series 
 of similar essays. Despite the belief expressed by an 
 optimistic critic of the volume that in it, and in other 
 separate contributions of mine to the literature of the 
 subject, I must have well-nigh exhausted the crop of 
 Scottish crime, I contrived to add to my former harvest a 
 number of fresh sheaves. These in the fullness of time 
 were duly garnered in The Riddle of the Ruthvejis and 
 Other Studies, published in 1919, as to which in view of its 
 comparative youth there is no need to say much now. I 
 was told that some apology is due to Robert Fergusson for 
 my exhibition of his engaging figure in such godless 
 company, an association which Avas justly termed incon- 
 gruous. I did so lor two reasons : I wished to speak a 
 good word for the lad, and the occasion served to say it ; 
 I also believed that his touching story would prove an 
 acceptable antidote to the naughtiness of his companions. 
 For the other subjects of Tlie Riddle I went somewhat 
 further afield than formerly ; the historical and the criminal 
 elements are better balanced, and I would fain hope that 
 the interest is thereby increased. Since then I have con- 
 tinued in tlie pages of the Juridical, with unabated zest, 
 
X A PEPuSOXAL PKEFACE 
 
 my criminous researches, and readers of that journal may 
 have been disposed to jib at my persistent appearances. I 
 can only plead that as a taste for these pursuits, like stamp- 
 collecting, wife-beating, and such recondite hobbies, grows 
 wdth indulgence, it is not surprising, seeing the evil com- 
 munications I have so long maintained, that I myself 
 should become incorrigible. 
 
 So here is a third gathering which I have the hardihood 
 to put forth, and as to which I must offer some justification. 
 Well, the paper on Glengarry was inspired by Raeburn's 
 splendid portrait, to the end that so imposing a person 
 should not lack some literary memorial ; that on Plagium, 
 by a curious instance of out-of-the-way wrong-doing. 
 The longest essay, in which an attempt is made to take 
 what is called a bird's eye view of the wide field of Scottish 
 poisoning, exemplifies the difficulty sometimes experienced 
 in seeino- a wood for the trees. I know that it suffers from 
 cono'estion, but I was wishful to cover so far as possible 
 the whole ground. Two papers of earlier date for which 
 no room was found in my last book are here reprinted : 
 "Poison and Plagiary" and "The Strange Woman." Of 
 these the Eaglesham case is important on legal, medical, 
 and psychologic grounds. It is the first trial in Scotland 
 and the third in Britain for murder by poisoning with 
 prussic acid. Mrs. Mackinnon's was a famous affair in its 
 day, and notwithstanding some disagreeable features is 
 perhaps worth recalling. I had grave doubts as to the 
 propriety of granting her admission, but certain local 
 admirers have desired her presence, so here she is. If she 
 be deemed unworthy of the entree, the reader is welcome, 
 with Professor Monro, to cut her dead. With the amiable 
 purpose of keeping him, the reader, in as cheerful a frame 
 of mind as is consistent with the character of his company, 
 
A PERSONAL PEEFACE xi 
 
 the paper on the Edinburgh students' " rag," which affords 
 some comic relief, has been included. As its object is 
 purely recreative and no appeal is made to the erudite, 
 I have in this instance dispensed with the formality of 
 footnote references. For the rest, " The Twenty-seven 
 Gods " is a comedy of manners municipal ; A[r. Oliphant's 
 case, legal farce with a tragic underplot ; M'Kean's, melo- 
 drama of the Grand Guignol school. In the last article, 
 that on the occasion of Lord Braxfield's bi-centenary, I was 
 handicap23ed by having written elsewhere at large upon 
 that great judge. I have tried, however, to present in a 
 true and fairer light the attaching picture of his personality, 
 hitherto so wantonly camouflaged b}' the party colours of 
 Lord Cockburn. 
 
 Finally, I am in honour bound to give the reader fair 
 warning : there is still grist for the mill, and it is by no 
 means certain that he is done with me even yet. 
 
 WILLL4M KOUGHEAU 
 
 12 Belgrave Crescent, Edinburgh, 
 April 1922. 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 PAGR 
 
 GtLengarry's Way : a Footnote to " Waverley " . .1 
 
 Plagium : A Footnote to "Guy Mannering" . . .27 
 
 Locusta in Scotland : a Familiar Survey of Poisoning, as 
 
 Practised in that Realm ..... 47 
 
 Poison and Plagiary . . . . .119 
 
 The Strange Woman ...... 143 
 
 The Last Tulzie . . . , .167 
 
 The Twenty-Seven Gods of Linlithgow . . .197 
 
 The Hard Case of Mr. James Oliphant . . . 227 
 
 The Hanging of James M'Kean : Lord Braxfield's Last 
 
 Case 251 
 
 The Bi-Centenary of Lord Braxfield . . . 275 
 
ILLUSTRATIONS 
 
 Lord Braxfiei.d ...... Frontispiece 
 
 Macdonell of Glengarry . . . Tofacfpuye 22 
 
 Plan of Agnks Montgomery's Housk . . . „ 123 
 
 Execution at Libbkrton's Wynd-Head . . ,, 160 
 
 The College Comp.at . . . . . „ 170 
 
 Patrick Robertson . . . . . „ 178 
 
 James M'Kean at the Bar . . . . „ 269 
 
 Braxfield House, Lanarkshire . . . ,, 282 
 
 Braxfield House, the Original Front and Court- 
 yard .......,, 296 
 
GLENGARRY'S WAY: 
 
 A FOOTNOTE TO "WAVERLEY" 
 
GLENGARRY'S WAY: 
 A Footnote to "Waverley" 
 
 Fight as lawyers plead, 
 Who gain the best of reputation 
 When they can fetch a bad cause smoothly off : 
 You are in, tind must through. 
 
 — A Cure for a Cuckold. 
 
 WHEN the Author of Waverley designed the romantic 
 figure of Fergus Maclvor he borrowed, we are told, 
 certain traits for that fiery and impetuous chieftain fi-om 
 the character of his old acquaintance, Glengarry. (a) 
 
 The last of the Chiefs, the typical Celt, the enthusiastic 
 upholder of the heritable and feudal braveries of a day that 
 was gone, Alastair Ranaldson Macdonell, fifteenth of Glen- 
 garry, was the son and heir of Duncan Macdonell and 
 Marjory, daughter of Sir Ludovick Grant of Dalvey. His 
 grandfather fell at Falkirk in 1746. The date of his birth 
 is not recorded, but we know that his parents were married 
 in 1772, and he was their eldest child. On the death of his 
 father in 1788 Alastair succeeded as well to the much 
 encumbered family estates, as to the no less burdensome 
 traditions of an ancient and, pace Mr. Andrew Lang, an 
 honourable house — his granduncle was "Alastair Ruadh," 
 the young Glengarry whom that historian seeks to identify 
 with the notorious Pickle. (6) Bereft thus early of paternal 
 guidance and restraint, the lad's indisciplined nature 
 flourished amain in the congenial atmosphere of his heredi- 
 tary position. His mother, a woman of imperious and 
 haughty temper, alternately crossed and petted him, and 
 until her death in 1792 did all that in her lay to spoil him. 
 
 (a) Mackenzie's History of the Macdonalds, p. 356 ; Crockett's The Scott 
 Originals, p. 11 n. Captain MacTurk in -S'^ i?onon's TFe/^ owes something to the 
 same source. 
 
 {b) Macdonald's I'he Clan Donald, ii. 480 ; Lang's History of Scotland, iv. 525. 
 
4 GLENGARKY'S WAY 
 
 Yet he was not without certain good qualities which, 
 like the virtues of some absolute monarch, tempered the 
 severity of his rule. Provided due respect were paid to his 
 pretensions, he was generous and placable enough ; he exer- 
 cised a lavish hospitality, having in such matters, as was 
 said, the heart of a prince, and he grudged nothing that 
 ministered to his ancestral pride. But whatsoever he chose 
 to deem an affront to his dignity or privileges awoke in 
 him the primitive passions of his Celtic sires, hardly to be 
 assuaged but by blood — a disposition which earned for him 
 the sobriquet of " Alastair Fiadhaich."(a) In the peaceful 
 times in which his lot was cast this idiosyncrasy tended to 
 involve its possessor with the law of the land, and like that 
 fair litigant Miss Rugg, Glengarry had his trials, one of 
 which it is here my main purpose to describe. He himself, 
 of course, wore always the " Garb of Old Gaul," and when 
 he went abroad was attended by a retinue of armed 
 followers in full Highland costume, popularly known as 
 " Glengarry's tail," including the family bard as professional 
 proclaimer of his patron's state. 
 
 In 1794, on attaining his majority. Glengarry was 
 authorised to raise a regim.ent, called the Glengarry 
 Fencibles, of which he was appointed colonel. They are 
 said to have been a fine body of men, more than half of 
 whom were enlisted from the Glengarry estates. The 
 corps was reduced in 1802.(6) Recruiting in the High- 
 lands was, after the failure of the Forty-five, a matter of 
 much difficulty ; Culloden had cooled the martial ardour 
 of the clansmen, and landlords had to give an extra turn 
 to the screw. Glengarry's method with the conscientious 
 objector of the day appears from his instructions to his 
 agent in Inverness regarding the eviction of such of his 
 tenants as either for themselves, their sons or their 
 brothers, declined the honour of military service. "Their 
 leases being expired by Whitsunday first," he writes on 
 
 (a) The Clan Donald, ii. 485. 
 
 (6) Stewart's Sketches of the Highlanders, ii. 397. 
 
GLENGAPtRY'S WAY 5 
 
 29th November 1794, "and having refused to serve me, 
 I have fully determined to warn them out, and turn them 
 off my property without loss of time ; and as this is the 
 first order of the kind I have given you since I came of age, 
 I have only to add that your punctuality and expedition on 
 the present occasion will be marked by me." (a) This hint 
 was not lost upon the agent; the cottars were presently 
 banished, and their kindly crofts knew them no more. 
 
 On 1st May 1798 a subscription ball was given at 
 Inverness by the officers of the regiment and gentlemen of 
 the county, which was destined to make more noise in the 
 world than is usual for such social functions. Thither, in 
 full panoply of chieftainship, came Colonel Macdonell of 
 Glengarry, his bosom swelling with the pride of all the 
 Macdonalds. Miss Forbes of Culloden, a famous beauty, 
 was the belle of the ball; and among the guests was 
 Lieutenant Norman Macleod of the Black Watch, son of 
 Major Macleod and Anne, daughter of the famous Flora 
 Macdonald. The chief, the damsel, and the lad — these are 
 the protagonists of the tragedy ; there was a lighter after- 
 piece played that night by Miss Bell Chisholm, daughter of 
 the Provost, supported by the gallant Captain Morrit, to 
 which I shall return when the graver matter is disposed of. 
 The circumstances of the fracas are shortly stated by Mrs. 
 Margaret Macbean, a lady who attended the ball, in a letter 
 written on 5th May to her husband in Edinburgh : — " Such 
 wonderful events have happened here within these ten days 
 past ; the like have not been heard of in this corner of the 
 world this many a year — an elopement and a duel in one 
 day. I am sure your curiosity is raised, but you must have 
 a little patience until I relate the circumstances as they 
 happened. Well, to begin, there was a grand ball, given by 
 the officers and some of the county gentlemen, among the 
 rest Glengarry. He payed Miss Forbes, Culloden, a deal 
 of attention. Lieutenant Macleod of the 42nd asked her to 
 
 {a) Fraser-Mackinto8h's Letters of Two Centuries, p. 328. 
 
6 GLENGAREY'S WAY 
 
 dance and she did. Glengarry wished her not, and spoke 
 rough to Macleod. After the ball was over they quarrelled. 
 Macleod challenged Macdonald ; they fought, and Macleod 
 has got a severe wound, but not mortal ; the other has 
 escaped without a scratch ; some people would not be sorry 
 if he got a slight wound." (a) Thus Mrs. Macbean gives the 
 current version, inaccurate as we shall find in several par- 
 ticulars. Young Macleod's injury proved fatal, and Glen- 
 garry was indicted for his murder. After the duel that 
 chieftain had gone into retirement, and through his Edin- 
 burgh " doer " he consulted Henry Erskine, the leader of the 
 Scots Bar, who two years before had been deprived of the 
 office of Dean of Faculty, as to whether or not it were safe 
 for him to stand his trial. Erskine was of opinion that 
 though the case was a very serious one, Glengarry ought to 
 face the charge, and said if he returned for that purpose 
 he (counsel) would do the best he could in his behalf. So 
 Glengarry, electing to " stake his chance on Harry Erskine," 
 surrendered to the criminal authorities. (6) 
 
 His trial, which naturally excited immense interest in the 
 North and among the Highland advocates and writers, 
 began at Edinburgh before the High Court of Justiciary on 
 Monday, 6th August 1798. The judge presiding was Lord 
 Eskgrove — (the Justice-Clerk, Braxfield, was then in his last 
 illness) — with Lords Swinton and Dunsinnan ; the counsel 
 for the Crown were the Lord Advocate (Robert Dundas), 
 the Solicitor-General (Robert Blair), and James Oswald ; 
 Hugh Warrender, W.S., was Crown Agent; for the pannel 
 were the Hon. Henry Erskine, James Montgomery, and 
 William Rae, instructed by Coll Macdonald, W.S. The 
 proceedings are fully reported in the local newspapers of the 
 day, upon which, and on the official record in the Justiciary 
 Office, Edinburgh, the following account is based. (c) The 
 
 (a) I.etters of Two Centuries, p. 335. 
 (6) Fergusson's Henry Ersldne, p. 395. 
 
 (c) Books of Adjournal, 6th and 7th August ; Caledonian Mercury, 9th August ; 
 Edinburgh Advertiser, 10th August ; Scots Magazine, September 1798. 
 
GLENGAERY'S WAY 7 
 
 Court was crowded to suffocation, and the temperature was 
 in keeping with the excitement of the auditory. The 
 indictment sets forth that on the 3rd day of May last, on 
 the Muir or Links between Fort George and Ardersier, the 
 pannel did wickedly and feloniously discharge a pistol 
 loaded with ball at the now deceased Lieutenant Norman 
 Macleod of the 42nd Regiment of Foot, in consequence of 
 which Macleod was wounded on the right side immediately 
 under the arm, the ball having penetrated through the 
 right armpit into the back; and notwithstanding every 
 medical assistance having been immediately procured, 
 Macleod did, in consequence of the wound so given him by 
 the pannel, expire on the 3rd day of June thereafter, and 
 was thus murdered by the pannel. The jury were above 
 the average in social condition, being twelve landed pro- 
 prietors in the neighbourhood of Edinburgh, a Writer 
 to the Signet, a writer, and a merchant. Mr. James 
 Home, W.S., the only member of his Society whom I have 
 encountered on an assize — they were and are exempt 
 from serving on a jury, — was elected clerk. Glengarry 
 pleaded Not Guilty. No objection was taken to the 
 relevancy of the libel, but Rae for the pannel argued 
 that the wound was given in a duel into which he was 
 drawn in self-defence, under the most imperious necessity, 
 and therefore craved that he be allowed a proof of all 
 facts and circumstances which might alleviate or exculpate 
 from the charge. The Court, while holding that by the 
 law of Scotland killing in a duel was murder, not culpable 
 homicide, and that a person tried therefor must either 
 be found guilty of murder or be acquitted, allowed the 
 proof craved. (a) 
 
 " The libel was laid for Murder at Common Law," says 
 Burnett in his account of the case ; " and the Court, before 
 pronouncing their Interlocutor on the Relevancy, and on the 
 plea of Self-defence being stated, expressed in clear terms 
 
 (a) Books of Adjournal. 
 
8 GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 their opinion that the plea of* Self-defence was inadmissible 
 on killing in a Duel."(<^) 
 
 The first Avitness called for the Crown was Mrs. Duff, 
 formerly Miss Sarah Louisa Forbes, daughter of Arthur 
 Forbes of Culloden, she in the interval between the ball 
 and the trial having married Mr. Hugh Robert Duff, younger 
 of Muirtown. Among other delightful reminiscences of 
 the eccentric Lord Eskgrove preserved by Henry Cockburn 
 is the manner in which Mrs. DuflP was sworn by his Lord- 
 ship : — " In the trial of Glengarry for murder in a duel," 
 he writes, " a lady of great beauty was called as a 
 witness. She came into court veiled. But before adminis- 
 tering the oath Eskgrove gave her this exposition of 
 her duty — ' l^'oung woman ! a^ou will now consider yourself 
 as in the presence of Almighty God and of this High 
 Court. Lift up your veil, throw off all modesty, and look 
 me in the face.'"(?>) In reply to the Lord Advocate, Mrs. 
 Duff deposed that she was present at the ball at Inver- 
 ness on the night in question. She danced both with 
 Glengarry and with Macleod that evening. She was en- 
 gaged for the dance /ifter supper to Mr. Kanald Macdonald. 
 Glengarry came up and said she had promised him that 
 dance ; she told him that she had no recollection of doing 
 so. He took this " a little warm," went off, and presently 
 returned to say that Mr. Macdonald had relinquished in his 
 favour the right to dance with her. She then said that she 
 would dance with neither of them ; but Glengarry persisting 
 to press his claim, Macleod, who was sitting beside her, 
 remarked, " Why do you teaze the lady ? can't you allow 
 her to choose for herself; you are one of the Stewards, and 
 may command as many dances as you please." Whereupon 
 Glengarry "in a passionate manner" retorted, "It is no 
 business of yours ; you should not interfere." Macleod 
 replied that he only did so in a friendly wa}^ and meant 
 
 (a) Burnett's Treatise on the Criminal Latv of Scotland, p. 51. 
 (6) Cockburn's Memorials of his Time, 1856, p. 122. 
 
GLENGAKRY'S WAY 9 
 
 no offence. Glengarry seemed warm, but Macleod was 
 perfectly calm ; she danced a reel with hhn before leaving 
 the ballroom, which on account of the dispute she did earlier 
 than she intended. 
 
 Eanald Macdonald, advocate, deposed that he dined 
 with Macleod and Glengarry in the mess of the 79th ; none 
 of the party was the worse of liquor. After dinner they 
 went to the ball. He was engaged to Miss Forbes for the 
 last country dance; Glengarry solicited the lady for his 
 partner, and he gave up his own right. Glengarry and 
 Macleod had words about the matter, but witness left the 
 room to see some ladies to their carriage. On returning, he 
 met the parties coming out of the ballroom ; they were 
 quarrelling. Later, in the messroom of the 79th, high 
 words passed between them ; Macleod said, " You are very 
 impertinent " ; Glengarry struck him on the bonnet with his 
 cane. They then came down the room, still abusing each 
 other — a long table was between them, and when they 
 reached the foot. Glengarry again struck Macleod on the 
 face, and kicked him. Macleod drew his dirk and the 
 witness came between them, saying he hoped Macleod would 
 not think of running a man through who was unarmed. 
 They were then separated and retired to different rooms, 
 Macleod exclaiming, " You shall hear from me, you damned 
 eternal rascal." Fearing the consequences, witness informed 
 Major M'Caskill, the Commanding Officer, with a view 
 to Macleod being put under arrest, which he believed 
 was done. 
 
 Captain Neil Campbell of the 79th Eegiment, Macleod's 
 second in the duel, described the quarrel in the messroom. 
 Glengarry said, "It was the height of presumption for 
 you to interfere." " Since you have followed it so far," 
 replied Macleod, "I must tell you you are most imper- 
 tinent." Glengarry then struck Macleod on the face with 
 his cane and kicked him twice on the breech with his 
 feet, saying, "You know what that's for; it is now day- 
 light, and you can use pen and ink." Macleod said he 
 
10 GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 could never have believed Glengarry would behave in so 
 ungentlemanly a manner, and drawing his dirk, added, " If 
 I were not more of a gentleman than you, I would run 
 you through the body." The company interposed, and 
 Macleod and witness went to another room, where a 
 challenge was drawn up, which he carried at once to 
 Glengarry. A meeting was arranged at a place called 
 the Long Loan, on the beach near Inverness, for six o'clock 
 that morning. Macleod and witness waited there an hour, 
 but Glengarry, because of some misunderstanding as to the 
 ground, did not appear, and they had to leave, owing to the 
 intervention of the magistrates, who arrived on the scene 
 to stop the duel. They next went to Sinclair's Inn, three 
 miles from Inverness, on the road to Fort George, where 
 at Macleod's request witness wrote a letter to Major 
 Macdonald, Glengarry's second, informing him of their 
 whereabouts, and that the place was "very proper" for 
 settling the dispute. No answer came ; so they returned 
 to Inverness, where witness waited upon the major, who 
 said that Glengarry was then at Culloden House, but a 
 reply would be sent in the morning. A meeting was 
 arranged next day on the links at Campbelltown, near 
 Fort George, where the parties met accordingly. Major 
 Macdonald proposed an amicable settlement, to which 
 Macleod agreed on condition that Glengarry should make 
 an apology in writing, to be dictated by Majors M'Lean 
 and M'Caskill, and also give up to him the cane with 
 which he struck him, " to be used as he (Macleod) thought 
 proper." Glengarry was willing to apologise, but refused 
 to give up the cane ; and as Macleod would not recede, the 
 affair had to go on. The witness produced pistols and 
 balls ; as the latter proved too small he proposed to wrap 
 them in leather, but to this the major would not assent. 
 They then placed their men, witness suggesting ten paces, 
 Macdonald twelve ; they agreed upon eleven, the witness 
 to give the word to fire. The parties fired almost together ; 
 Macleod was wounded but kept his ground, saying that 
 
GLENGARRY'S WAY 11 
 
 unless Glengarry would apologise they must load again. 
 The seconds, however, intervened, and on Macleod ad- 
 mitting sorrow for what he did at the beginning of the 
 business. Glengarry expressed regret for his share in the 
 later stages, so they shook hands and parted. Captain 
 Campbell was cross-examined as follows : — " (Q.) What use 
 do you think Lieutenant Macleod was to make of the cane 
 if delivered up?— (^.) Any use he chose. (Q.) Do you 
 mean that he might inflict a blow on Glengarry with it ? — 
 (A.) If he thought fit to do so, he might." At Sinclair's 
 Inn Macleod said that if Glengarry did not give him satis- 
 faction he would post him for a coward. There was a 
 report at Inverness that Glengarry had " shyed to fight." 
 
 Lieutenant Kymond Hicks of the 79th Eegiment gave 
 similar evidence regarding the quarrel in the messroom, at 
 which he was present. It was then past five o'clock in the 
 morning. 
 
 Major Duncan Macdonald of the 15th Regiment of Foot, 
 who acted as Glengarry's second, deponed that Macleod 
 said to Glengarry in the messroom, "You are damned 
 impertinent," whereupon Glengarry struck him with a 
 small cane on the bonnet. There were high words between 
 them and Glengarry struck him again ; witness interfered, 
 and took Glengarry away. After receiving the challenge 
 Glengarry put himself in his hands. They went to the 
 ground proposed, but nobody came : there was a mistake 
 as to the place of meeting. Glengarry did not see Captain 
 Campbell's letter, written from Sinclair's Inn, as he was 
 then at Culloden House. Later in the day witness met 
 Captain Campbell and proposed an accommodation — the 
 matter to be referred to Majors M'Caskill and M'Lean, 
 friends of Macleod ; but Macleod stipulated for a written 
 apology and for delivery of the cane, to be used as he saw 
 fit. The latter condition witness held to be inadmissible, 
 and the meeting at Campbelltown was arranged. Next 
 day when the parties met he again tried to effect a settle- 
 ment, but Macleod insisted on delivery of the cane, to 
 
12 GLENGAREY'S WAY 
 
 wliicli witness would not consent, as he never heard of a 
 British officer making such a concession. On the parties 
 taking the ground he objected to Glengarry's position, the 
 sun being in his eyes ; they tossed up for it, and Glengarry 
 won. It was agreed to fire at the word of command, which 
 they did nearly at the same time. Perceiving that Macleod 
 was wounded he ran up to him saying, " I'm afraid you are 
 hurt." Captain Campbell said, "It's only a scratch." "I 
 am able to stand," said Macleod ; " Glengarry, keep your 
 ground." But Macdonald protested : " Gentlemen, I did 
 not come here to see you commit murder. If you offer to 
 fire another shot, I'm off." Macleod said Glengarry must 
 apologise first ; Glengarry said that Macleod must first do 
 so. Macleod then said, " I am sorry for the beginning of 
 this affair"; " Then," said Glengarry, "I am exceedingly 
 sorry for the latter part of it." Finally Macleod remarked, 
 " You must be satisfied, Glengarry, that I received your 
 fire like a man." Witness was certain that Glengarry 
 entertained no malice against the deceased, and was con- 
 vinced that he always desired an accommodation. 
 
 Lieutenant Gordon Cameron of the 79th deposed that 
 he met Major Macdonald on 2nd May and walked with 
 him towards Sinclair's Inn, where they saw Macleod and 
 Campbell. Macleod asked him what 'people were saying in 
 Inverness about the matter ; he replied that it was thought 
 Macleod had acted very right and as an ofiicer should do. 
 " I'll give your friend one other opportunity of coming 
 forward," said Macleod to Macdonald, " and if he doesn't, I 
 shall expose him." While waiting for Glengarry's return 
 from Culloden House, Macleod asked witness his own 
 opinion. He answered, " If Glengarry can reconcile what 
 he has done to his own feelings, I think you have done 
 enough to vindicate your honour as an ofiicer and a gentle- 
 man, by sending repeated challenges, and he not coming 
 forward." 
 
 James Macpherson of Ardersier deposed that while 
 returning home from Fort George on 3rd May he met a 
 
GLENGAKKY'S WAY 13 
 
 soldier, who cried, " For God's sake run forward, and prevent 
 bloodshed ! " He heard the report of a pistol, and coming 
 to the place saw the parties. Glengarry said to Macleod, 
 "You must say you meant no insult"; Macleod replied, 
 " That is what I have always said," adding that Glengarry 
 must now consider him a gentleman and a man of honour. 
 Thereupon they shook hands and parted. 
 
 Ensign John M'Curry of the 7th Fencible Regiment, 
 who was in company with Mr. Macpherson, corroborated. 
 Lieutenant Andrew Miller of the 78th Regiment of Foot 
 deposed that on 2nd May, in the Muir of Culloden, he 
 received from Macleod, after he had left Sinclair's Inn, 
 a letter directed to Captain Campbell, pressing for an 
 immediate meeting with Glengarry, which he duly delivered. 
 Macleod said he would accept from Glengarry no apology 
 other than that formerly mentioned. 
 
 Ebenezer Brown, assistant surgeon, 79th Regiment, 
 deposed that he accompanied Captain Campbell in a post- 
 chaise to Campbelltown, where he understood a duel was 
 to be fought. He waited in the chaise for some time, and 
 when summoned to the ground, found Macleod wounded by 
 a pistol ball under the right armpit. He was carried to 
 Fort George, where the ball was extracted from below the 
 left shoulder blade. For the first fortnight he seemed to 
 be recovering, but on the fifteenth day he became worse, 
 and died on 3rd June, thirty -one days after receiving his 
 injury. James Roy, surgeon to the garrison of Fort George, 
 and James Moir, surgeon, 7th Fencible Regiment, who 
 attended Macleod in his illness, corroborated. They per- 
 formed a post-mortem and made a report, which they 
 identified. The reading of this document, entitled, "Note 
 of Appearances on the Body of Lieutenant Macleod, upon 
 Examination after Death," closed the Crown case. 
 
 Two witnesses only were examined for the defence : 
 Miss Jean Walecoat, daughter of Captain Thomas Walecoat, 
 residing in Inverness, who gave as to what happened at the 
 ball an account similar to that given by Mrs. Dufi', with the 
 
14 GLENGAKKY'S WAY 
 
 addition that she thought Glengarry then rather the worse 
 of liquor ; and Lieutenant William Macdonald of the 37th 
 Regiment, who corroborated what had been stated in 
 evidence as to the proposed posting of Glengarry as a 
 coward, and the reports circulated at Inverness to his 
 prejudice for declining to meet Macleod. 
 
 The proof being closed, counsel addressed, and Lord 
 Eskgrove charged the jury. No report of these speeches 
 has survived ; it is merely mentioned that " the Lord 
 Advocate summed up the evidence for the Crown in an 
 elegant and impressive speech, as did the Hon. Henry 
 Erskine for the pannel in his usual eloquent manner. Lord 
 Eskgrove charged the jury, and recapitulated the evidence 
 with great candour and impartiality." Thus the Mercury 
 reporter ; but from what Henry Cockburn tells us of his 
 Lordship's judicial methods, both jury and audience, which 
 included "a great number of Ladies and persons of Rank 
 and Fashion," must have had a trying time. " His tedious- 
 ness," writes Cockburn, "both of manner and matter, in 
 charging juries was most dreadful. It was the custom to 
 make juries stand while the judge was addressing them ; 
 but no other judge was punctilious about it. Eskgrove 
 however insisted upon it ; and if any one of them slipped 
 cunningly down to his seat, or dropped into it from inability 
 to stand any longer, the unfortunate wight was sure to be 
 reminded by his Lordship that ' these were not the times in 
 which there should be any disrespect of this High Court, 
 or even of the law.' Often have I gone back to the court 
 at midnight and found him, whom I had left mumbling- 
 hours before, still going on, with the smoky unsnuffed 
 tallow candles in greasy tin candlesticks, and the poor 
 despairing jurymen, most of the audience having retired 
 or being asleep ; the wagging of His Lordship's nose and 
 chin being the chief signs that he was still ' char-ging.' "(a) 
 At four o'clock in the morning of Tuesday, 7th August, his 
 
 (ffl) Memoriah of his Tirae, p. 123. 
 
GLENGAREY'S WAY 15 
 
 Lordship having exhausted at once his subject and the 
 patience of his hearers, the jury was " inclosed," and 
 ordained to return their verdict in the same place that day 
 at noon, " the pannel in the mean time to be committed 
 prisoner to the Tolbooth of Canongate," and the Court 
 adjourned, (a) 
 
 It appears that the line taken by Erskine in his speech 
 was an appeal to the jury on the point of honour, stress 
 being laid on the persistent efforts of Major Macdonald and 
 his principal to offer every kind of apology consistent with 
 their character as gentlemen. His biographer adds that he 
 was careful to note, and to make the most of in his client's 
 behalf, the animus displayed by the Crown witnesses ; but, 
 so far as reported, these seem to have given their evidence 
 with commendable fairness. Erskine began his address at 
 midnight and spoke for three hours. So confident was 
 Glengarry of the result of this "splendid appeal," that he 
 objected to await the verdict in the Tolbooth ; but Erskine 
 dryly remarked, " If Glengarry is wise he will return to 
 prison." (h) 
 
 When the Court met next day the crowd was greater 
 than ever ; popular sentiment, which hitherto had been 
 against the accused, now favoured an acquittal, and the 
 unanimous finding of Not Guilty was greeted with prolonged 
 applause. The verdict having been recorded, the Chancellor 
 of the Jury (Charles Brown of Coalstoun) explained that the 
 sole ground on which it proceeded was the anxious desire 
 latterly manifested by the pannel and his second amicably 
 to settle the matter, as the jury highly disapproved of 
 his conduct at the beginning of the dispute, and it was 
 fortunate for him that the duel did not take place so soon 
 as intended, before any attempt was made to apologise, as 
 in that case they would have returned a very different 
 verdict. Lord Eskgrove expressed approbation of the jury's 
 sentiments, adding some cliaracteristic observations on the 
 
 ^ (a) Books of Adjournal. 
 
 (b) Henry Erskine, p. 396. 
 
16 GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 illegal and dangerous practice of duelling ; Lord Swinton, 
 while assenting generally to the jury's views, deprecated 
 the tendency to turn a Court of Law into a Court of 
 Honour, and described duelling as " a horrid Gothic 
 custom," which the Legislature had done everything in its 
 power to discourage. The pannel was then assoilzied and 
 dismissed from the bar, and the Court rose, (a) 
 
 That Glengarry was lucky to escape so easily the con- 
 sequences of such a discreditable business was the opinion 
 of his contemporaries, professional and lay. The trial, in 
 the considered judgment of Burnett, " ought to have had a 
 very different issue " ; (h) and Fraser of Gortuleg writes on 
 7th August to the agent for the defence : "I cannot avoid 
 congratulating you on Glengarry's escape, which was narrow 
 indeed. ... I sincerely wish he may make good use of 
 the hairbreadth escape." (c) Glengarry's friends, with 
 questionable taste, gave him "a great dinner" at Oman's 
 Hotel in Edinburgh, to celebrate his acquittal. Henry 
 Erskine was invited, but declined, as his admiration of the 
 part played by his client in the late tragedy was not suffi- 
 ciently strong to admit of his being present. (c?) There is 
 an interesting letter, written on 14th August, by Glen- 
 garry's law agent and kinsman. Coll Macdonald of Dalness, 
 W.S., giving his own impressions of the case, which is 
 worth quoting : — " I have yet scarcely recovered from the 
 fatigues of Glengarrie's trial. You would have several 
 public as well as private accounts of it, but none can give 
 an adequate idea of the whole of what appeared in the 
 course of it. The Lord Advocate exerted the utmost pitch 
 of his abilities, and the verdict returned does not meet with 
 the general approbation of the public, though I for one am 
 convinced that it is a proper verdict, warranted by the 
 evidence adduced. The public voice was so much against 
 
 (a) Books of Adjournal. 
 
 (b) Criminal Law, p. 51. 
 
 (c) Fraser-Mackintosh's Antiquarian Notes, Second Series, p. 138. 
 {0.) Henri) Erskine, p. 397. 
 
GLENGAEEY'S WAY 17 
 
 Glengarry that not a single one among his friends thought 
 that he would have been acquitted by a unanimous verdict. 
 If you compare the Mercury and the Advertiser account, it 
 will convey a tolerable good criterion of the import of the 
 evidence, though several material things are omitted in 
 both — particularly no notice is taken of a letter signed 
 ' Neill Campbell, Captain, 79th Regiment,' which Captain 
 Campbell denied to be his subscription. It was wrote to 
 the publisher of the Courant. The evidence of Mrs. Duff 
 is the subject of general talk ; without doubt you will hear 
 it. She remained in court to the last. The Lord Advocate 
 paid very many compliments to her beauty, etc., in the 
 course of his speech, but the Chancellor of the Jury said 
 she was the best evidence for Glengarry of all that had 
 been adduced." (a) It is a curious fact that with the ex- 
 ception of a brief reference in Sabine's Notes on Duels and 
 Duelling, no mention of so notable an affair of "honour" is 
 made in any of the standard works on the subject.(6) 
 
 The other incident associated with the famous ball at 
 Inverness was the elopement of two of the other guests, 
 Miss Bell Chisholm, the Provost's daughter, and Captain 
 Morrit, who, as the writer of the letter already quoted 
 informs us, " set off at twelve o'clock at night in a carriage 
 and four " for Elgin, making for Aberdeen. It appears that 
 the captain's attentions had been discouraged by the young 
 lady's family, who declined his acquaintance. She was 
 not missed till eight o'clock the next morning, when the 
 Provost, accompanied by two friends, at once started in 
 pursuit. "Their intention is to marry her whenever they 
 meet her, and I hope that Captain Morrit never intended 
 anything but what was honourable," says Mrs. Macbean, 
 though she is not sanguine as to the issue of the adventure. 
 " Every person is sorry for Miss Chisholm," she significantly 
 adds, " for you know what Morrit is." (c) Let us hope, 
 
 (a) Antiquarian Notes, Second Series, ]i. 139. 
 (6) Notes and Queries, 12. S. v. 43. 
 {v) Letters of Two Centuries, p. 336. 
 
18 GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 however, that the captain proved better than his reputa- 
 tion ; history is silent as to the denouement. 
 
 Glengarry's high spirit was untamed by this experience 
 of the law. The next we hear of him is as the principal 
 defender in a civil action of damages for injury and oppres- 
 sion, at the instance of Dr. Donald Macdonald of Fort 
 Augustus, before the Court of Session. The pursuer, who 
 was tenant of one of Glengarry's sheep farms, was of a dis- 
 position as fiery as his laird. The ill-feeling between them 
 was of long standing, it culminated in a personal scuffle, 
 and notwithstanding the intervention of common friends, 
 the doctor, considering himself the aggrieved party, refused 
 Glengarry's demand for an apology. A favourable oppor- 
 tunity presenting itself at Fort x\ugustus market, on 30th 
 September 1805, the doctor was severely beaten by Glen- 
 garry and some of his " tail." The legal proceedings taken 
 by him to obtain redress dragged on until 23rd June 1807, 
 when the case was decided in his favour. The defenders. 
 Glengarry, his factor, his piper and three other retainers, 
 were found guilty of " a violent and atrocious assault on 
 the person of the pursuer, to the effusion of his blood and 
 danger of his life." As, according to the judgment of the 
 Court, this outrage did not originate in a sudden quarrel, 
 but was the result of long-premeditated resentment and a 
 deliberate purpose of revenge, and was moreover attended 
 with many circumstances of great barbarity and peculiar 
 aggravation, "especially on the part of the defender Alex- 
 ander Macdonell of Glengarry," the defenders were found 
 liable in £2000 sterling of damages, as well as in the 
 expenses of the process. Further, in respect that Glengarry 
 was at the time of committing the offence a Justice of the 
 Peace and Deputy-Lieutenant of the county, the Court 
 remitted to the Lord Advocate to consider whether, in view 
 of "the uno^overnable resentment and violence" manifested 
 by Glengarry, it was proper he should be continued in 
 those offices, and also whether he should not be prosecuted 
 criminally. " Though not recovered from the dismay of our 
 
GLENGARRY'S WAY 19 
 
 discomfiture," writes his agent, Coll Macdonald, " 1 think it 
 right to communicate a copy of the interlocutor. . . . The 
 malicious are now making an attack on Sir James Mont- 
 gomery [the Lord Advocate] for not taking it up criminally, 
 and to every one concerned a certain share of censure is 
 allotted in the conversation of the Parliament House. In 
 particular the ladies took a great interest for the doctor." 
 An appeal to the House of Lords was contemplated ; 
 whether it was ever taken, and if so how it fared at the 
 hands of that alien tribunal, is unrecorded. (a) 
 
 In any case Glengarry seems to have been none the 
 worse for the judicial thunders. Certainly his inveterate 
 desire to quarrel was unabated, for within the year we find 
 him on the brink of a duel with Kothiemurchus — there was 
 a lady in the case — which was only averted by the good 
 sense and offices of Colonel Halkett and other peacemakers, 
 who saw in the circumstances " no necessity for proceeding 
 to extremities."(/>) 
 
 One would have expected Glengarry to have had enough 
 of Inverness dances, yet an incident, in itself sufficiently 
 ludicrous, arising out of the Northern Meeting ball in 1810 
 which he attended, was to involve him in another criminal 
 prosecution. The Hon. Archibald Fraser of Lovat, also one 
 of the party, on leaving the ball took by inadvertence 
 Glengarry's hat instead of his own. So soon as he reached 
 his hotel he discovered his mistake, and at once sent the 
 hat to Glengarry's lodging. "Next day, being Sunday," 
 writes Lovat to his kinsman, the Sheriff of Inverness-shire, 
 "I went to the High Kirk, when I was summoned in the 
 middle of the sermon, and called out by a message that 
 Glengarry insisted on seeing me on pressing business. I 
 came out of kirk to the alarm of the whole congregation, 
 who concluded that I had got a military express or was 
 taken ill. Upon going to Fraser's Hotel, not two hundred 
 yards distance, I found Glengarr}'- gone out of town, after 
 
 (a) Antiquarian Notes, Second Series, pp. 139-142. 
 (6) Letters of Two C'enturie.% p. 3.55. 
 
20 GLENGARKY'S WAY 
 
 beating open my locked door, in which there was a good 
 deal of money and papers in a law contest I have with 
 him . . . my apartment being ransacked, and his hat 
 not found. The door was left open by Glengarry, who in a 
 supercilious, dictatorial tone of voice halloo'd to the land- 
 lord to have the lock mended at his, Glengarry's, expense. 
 The manners of the gentleman I overlook ; but as a public 
 man I demand Glengarry and all the world to be made 
 sensible that any man's apartment is his sacred castle, and 
 that it is criminal to break it open under any pretence 
 without legal warrant."(a) Here were the makings of a 
 pretty quarrel ; but owing to the delicate health of Glen- 
 garry's wife at the time — he had married in 1802 a 
 daughter of Sir William Forbes of Pitsligo, and a result 
 of that transaction was looked for — Lovat magnanimously 
 delayed action for three months. When the lady was out 
 of danger, however, he invoked the aid of the law. The 
 Crown refused to prosecute, but intimated willingness to 
 concur in a process of criminal letters to be raised by 
 Lovat, which was accordingly done. Later, on the advice 
 of friends, the proceedings were withdrawn. 
 
 In addition to these personal actions Glengarry, in his 
 capacity of landlord, was constantly involved in litigations 
 with his numerous tenants, in most of which he seems to 
 have been unsuccessful. He was hardly more happily 
 inspired in raising with Clanranald the vexed question of 
 the chieftainship of the Clan Donald, that controversy so 
 long and warmly waged, upon which so much ink and 
 temper have been wasted. 
 
 Scott's Letter Si Journal, and Life afford many and 
 more agreeable glimpses of Glengarry in social and friendly 
 relations with Sir Walter. On 3rd March 1816 the chief 
 writes offering to present to Scott the historic staghound : 
 " His name is Maida, out of respect for that action in 
 which my brother had the honour to lead the 78th High- 
 
 (a) Letters of Two Centuries, p. .361. 
 
GLENGAERY'S WAY 21 
 
 landers to victory. This dog is now in his prime, and has 
 been bled to deer and roe, and should you wish for more 
 of the deer blood for yourself, command me freely." Scott 
 accepted the gift, which on 12th April he describes to 
 Joanna Baillie as " a large bloodhound, allow'd to be the 
 finest dog of the kind in Scotland, perfectly gentle, affec- 
 tionate, and good - natured, and the darling of all the 
 children. I had him in a present from Glengarry, who 
 has refused the breed to people of the very first rank." (a) 
 Glengarry's brother was the celebrated General Sir James 
 Macdonell, K.C.B., " the bravest man in Britain," who is 
 remembered for his holding of the gate at Hougoumont.(5) 
 He it was who, when Landseer asked leave to paint him, 
 replied in the emphatic words of Scripture, " Is thy servant 
 a dog that he should do this thing ? " (c) Apart from 
 Raeburn's supreme presentment, the best portrait we have 
 of Glengarry is that given a few years later by Sir Walter 
 in his Diary : — " I had a call from Glengarry yesterday, 
 as kind and friendly as usual. This gentleman is a kind 
 of Quixote in our age, having retained in their full extent 
 the whole feelings of clanship and chieftainship, elsewhere 
 so long abandoned. He seems to have lived a century too 
 late, and to exist, in a state of complete law and order, 
 like a Glengarry of old, whose will was law to his sept. 
 Warm-hearted, generous, friendly, he is beloved by those 
 who know him, and his efforts are unceasing to show 
 kindness to those of his clan who are disposed fully to 
 admit his pretensions. To dispute them is to incur his 
 resentment, which has sometimes broken out in acts of 
 violence which have brought him into collision with the 
 law. To me he is a treasure, as being full of information 
 as to the history of his own clan, and the manners and 
 customs of the Highlanders in general. Strong, active, 
 and muscular, he follows the chase of the deer for days 
 
 (a) Familiar Letters of Sir Walter Scott, i. 358. 
 ^ (6) History of the Macdonalds, p. 355. 
 (c) Skene's Memories of Sir Walter Scott, p. 177. 
 
22 GLENGAKRY'S WAY 
 
 and nights together, sleeping in his plaicl when darkness 
 overtakes him in the forest. He was fortunate in marrying 
 a daughter of Sir William Forbes, who, by yielding to his 
 peculiar ideas in general, possesses much deserved influence 
 with him. The number of his singular exploits would fill 
 a volume ; for, as his pretensions are high, and not always 
 willingly yielded to, he is every now and then giving rise 
 to some rumour. He is, on many of these occasions, as 
 much sinned against as sinning; for men, knowing his 
 temper, sometimes provoke him, conscious that Glengarry, 
 from his character for violence, will always be put in the 
 wrong by the public. I have seen him behave in a very 
 manly manner when thus tempted. He has of late prose- 
 cuted a quarrel, ridiculous enough in the present day, 
 to have himself admitted and recognised as Chief of the 
 whole Clan Ranald, or surname of Macdonald. ... It is 
 absurd to set up the jus sanguinis now, which Glengarry's 
 ancestors did not, or could not, make good, when it was a 
 right worth combating for." (a) 
 
 It is probable that Sir Walter's sentiment for his friend 
 was coloured by the fact that Glengarry's wife was the 
 daughter of his own first love. The marriage was a happy 
 one, for contrary to custom Glengarry seems to have shown 
 himself most amiable in his domestic relations, and a family 
 of one son and seven daughters — six sons had died in 
 infancy— formed the home circle at Garry Cottage. Inver- 
 garry House and shootings were, owing to the chiefs 
 embarrassed circumstances, always let. ^neas Ranaldson 
 Macdonell, the son and heir, w^as a source of great pride 
 to his parents. He was a good scholar and distinguished 
 himself when at Perth x\.cademy.(6) Like his father, the 
 lad was a keen sportsman. "The young Laird of Glen- 
 garrie kill'd a hart shooting at a hind," the Duke of Atholl's 
 keeper reports to his Grace in January 1824, " which pleased 
 Glengarrie and the young man as much as if it had been a 
 
 (a) The Journal of Sir Walter Scott, i. 120. 
 
 (6) Antiquarian Notes, p. 147; History of the Macdonalds, p. 3.59. 
 
Macdonkll or Glengarry. 
 
 (Aller the portrait by !>ir Henrj' Raeburn in the National Galler.v of Scotland.) 
 
GLENGAKRY'S WAY 23 
 
 hart in season " ; and the same month Lord Charles Murray 
 writes to the Duchess : " Glengarry is in town, having 
 come up to bring ^neas to Eton. He tells me that he 
 has a good idea of the Gaelic, and that he killed his deer, 
 and slipped the hounds for his father before he crossed the 
 Tweed, according to an ancient vow made by a Glengarry 
 to that effect. To accomplish this they went to the Forest 
 of Atholl, and M'Intire's [the keeper] good generalship 
 proved quite successful." (a) 
 
 I lack space to recount the many anecdotes of Glengarry 
 which may be gleaned from the several authorities upon 
 whom I have so largely drawn, but of an incident men- 
 tioned by Sir Walter one would gladly have found room 
 for more. " We have had Marechal Macdonald here," he 
 writes to Skene from Edinburgh on 24th June 1825 ; "we 
 had a capital account of Glengarry visiting the interior 
 of a convent in the ancient Highland garb, and the effect of 
 such an apparition on the nuns, who fled in all directions." 
 Scott used to tell the story with great delight. (6) Some- 
 thing good, too, must underlie the following reference in 
 a letter to William Stewart Rose of 12th October of 
 that year : " Glengarry's helmet is true enough ; but 
 why speculate on what can come either in or on such an 
 extraordinary head ? " (c) 
 
 The visit of George the Fourth to Edinburgh in August 
 1822 — that regal orgy of snobbery m excelsis — provided 
 Glengarry with a part to play after his own heart. Scott 
 stage-managed what he terms " this most royal row " — " a 
 sort of grand ' Terryfication ' of the Holyrood chapters in 
 Waverley,'' is Lockhart's apt description — when the fat 
 Florizel (aged 60) appeared as Bonnie Prince Charlie, and 
 Sir Walter as the Baron of Bradwardine ; and we read how 
 the green room in Castle Street was " besieged by swelling- 
 chieftains," disputing fiercely as to the relative positions of 
 
 (a) Atholl Chronicles, iv. 348. 
 ^ (h) Skene's Memories, p. 132. 
 
 (c) Familiar Letters, ii. 356. 
 
24 GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 their clans at Bannockburn, which they held to be the 
 precedent for determining their respective places in the line 
 of the King's escort ; and with what unwearied good-humour 
 Scott adjusted their competing claims and smoothed their 
 ruffled plumage — a task beyond the ability of any other 
 man in Scotland. (a) Glengarry came well out of these 
 rivalries, for we find him in command of the Glengarry 
 Highlanders, of whom since 1808 he had been Lieutenant- 
 Colonel, guarding the royal carriage on the King's arrival 
 at Leith. "After his Majesty was seated in his carriage, 
 Glengarry on horseback forced his way through every 
 obstacle, and advancing close to the royal carriage exclaimed, 
 ' Your Majesty is welcome to Scotland ! ' a salutation which 
 was returned by a most gracious bow from the Sovereign. "(6) 
 In the State procession from Holyrood to the Castle on 
 Thursday, 22nd August, the Glengarry Highlanders, headed 
 by their chief, attracted much attention. " Glengarry has 
 a small, but select following ; twelve gentlemen of his house, 
 amongst whom we noticed the gallant Colonel Macdonell, 
 brother of the Chief, and famous for his achievements at the 
 defence of Hougoumont, where, assisted only by a serjeant 
 of the Guards, he slew or drove back six French grenadiers, 
 who had forced their way into the courtyard. Also we saw 
 Barrisdale, Scothouse, Major Macdonell, and other cadets of 
 this ancient line. Each had a gillie in attendance — tall, 
 raw-boned, swarthy fellows, who, besides the sword and 
 target, carried guns of portentous length. We believe they 
 are chiefly the foresters of the Chieftain ; and indeed they 
 look as if they had done nothing all their lives but lived by 
 hunting, and slept in the woods."(c) Glengarry must have 
 been gratified by this public appreciation of his "tail." At 
 the great banquet in the Parliament House on 24th August, 
 which rounded off the royal visit, immediately after the 
 toast, "The Author of Waverley, whoever he may be," 
 
 (a) Lockhart's Life of Scott, v. 192. 
 
 (b) Historical Account of His Majesty's Visit to Scotland, p. 101. 
 
 (c) Edinburgh Weekly Journal, 21st August 1822. 
 
GLENGARRY'S WAY 25 
 
 Glengarry, "in a warm speech, in which he dwelt at some 
 length upon the virtues and patriotism of one who, he said, 
 had been the patron of his early life," proposed the memory 
 of Lord Melville, (a) He dined more quietly with Scott in 
 Castle Street, when the poet Crabbe, who was so amazed by 
 the " Celtic invasion," was also of the party and took " Lady 
 Glengarry " in to dinner. 
 
 This was Glengarry's apogee. Like Fergus Maclvor, he 
 had "stretched his means to the uttermost to maintain the 
 rude and plentiful hospitality which was the most valued 
 attribute of a chieftain." Times had changed; his estates 
 were heavily burdened, and despite raised rents and the 
 constant stream of emigration to make way for sheep 
 farms, his circumstances became daily more straitened. He 
 realised too late the need for retrenchment. Visitino- his 
 kinsman, Captain Duncan Macdonell of Aonach, in the 
 summer of 1827, he remarked, "Duncan, I have been 
 thoughtless ; I have been, as I thought, sustaining the 
 honour of my ancestors ; but now I see that I have been 
 wasting the heritage that generations of them have left me. 
 I must turn over a new leaf, I am determined to do it ; I 
 am going south by-and-bye to have this business definitely 
 arranged."(6) But it was not to be. On 14th January 
 1828, the steamboat Stirling Castle, aboard which he ^vas 
 making the journey from Inverness to Glasgow, broke down 
 after leaving the Canal, and was driven ashore in a oale 
 at Corran, near Fort William. Glengarry, in attempting 
 to leap from the stranded vessel to the shore, slipped upon 
 the rocks, and in falling received a violent blow on the 
 head. He was able to reach safety with the help of his 
 companions, but died a few hours later, (c) He was buried 
 in the cemetery of Killionan, beside the chieftains of his 
 race, and the bards made loud lamentation for the tragic 
 fate of him who had striven so long and proudly to main- 
 
 (a) Historical Account, p. 243. 
 
 (6) History of the Macdonalds, p. 358. 
 
 (c) Edinburgh Advertiser, 25th January 1828. 
 
26 GLENGARRY'S WAY 
 
 tain the old magnificence of bygone days.(a) "I have 
 this day the melancholy news of Glengarry's death, and 
 was greatly shocked," writes Sir Walter Scott on 21st 
 January. " The eccentric parts of his character, the pre- 
 tensions which he supported with violence and assumption 
 of rank and authority, were obvious subjects of censure and 
 ridicule, which in some points were not undeserved. He 
 played the part of a chieftain too nigh the life to be popular 
 among an altered race, with whom he thought, felt, and 
 acted, I may say in right and wrong, as a chieftain of a 
 hundred years since would have done, while his conduct 
 was viewed entirely by modern eyes, and tried by modern 
 rules."(6) 
 
 On Glengarry's death his afiairs were found to be so 
 seriously involved that the estates had to be sold, and his 
 son and successor, by a strange irony of fate, emigrated to 
 Australia, as so many humbler members of the clan had 
 already done to Canada, in quest of the livelihood denied 
 them in their native land.(c) All that remained to the 
 family of the great territories of their forebears was the 
 blackened ruin of Invergarry Castle, the eyry of that eagle 
 race, ravaged, like the fortunes of its owners, by the 
 passions of the Forty-five. (cZ) 
 
 (a) The Clan Donald, ii. 488. 
 
 (6) Journal, ii. 113. 
 
 (c) History of the Macdonalds, p. 361. 
 
 {d) The Clan Donald, ii. 475. 
 
PLAGIUM : 
 
 A FOOTNOTE TO "GUY MANNERING" 
 
PLAGIUM : 
 A Footnote to "Guy Mannering" 
 
 "Pardon me," said Pleydell, " it \s plagium, and 'plagium is felony." 
 
 — Guy Mannering. 
 
 IN An Apology for Idlers, that delectable essay which is 
 to the Greeks foolishness, Robert Louis Stevenson, 
 lookinsf back on his own education, remarks, " I still 
 remember that Emphyteusis is not a disease, nor Stillicide 
 a crime." Whether or not his stock of legal knowledge 
 was so extensive as to embrace the true significance of 
 plagium or man-stealing, we cannot tell ; but it is beyond 
 the peradventure of a doubt that Mr. Ebenezer Balfour of 
 Shaws, falsely so-called, and Captain Elias Hoseason of the 
 brig Covenant, of Dysart, in kidnapping David Balfour as 
 they did for the delight of the posterities, were guilty, art 
 and part, of that unconventional offence, and jointly and 
 severally incurred whatever may be the precise penalty law- 
 fully thereto belonging. Such also, in the opinion of that 
 excellent lawyer Mr. Counsellor Pleydell, was the crime 
 committed by those earlier rascals, Gilbert Glossin, Esquire, 
 " late writer in . . . ., now Laird of Ellangowan," and 
 Captain Dirk Hatteraick of the Yung/ramv Hagens- 
 laapen, in their machinations against the person of little 
 Harry Bertram. 
 
 Eeaders of Scott's incomparable tale need not to be 
 reminded how the child Harry, accompanying Supervisor 
 Kennedy to the Wood of Warroch, was, after the ganger's 
 murder by the smugglers, kidnapped by them at Glossin's 
 instigation, and conveyed to Holland for a season ; and 
 how, after divers diverting adventures, mainly through 
 the good offices of Meg Merrilies he recovered the heritage 
 of his fathers, a consummation to which the genial Edin- 
 
 29 
 
30 PLAGIUM 
 
 burgh advocate materially contributed. When Glossin 
 was about to be committed to prison for his share in the 
 conspiracy, the wily ci-devant writer took exception to the 
 magistrates' decision. "Forgive me, Mr. Pleydell," said 
 he ; " there is only one case upon record, Torrence and 
 Waldie. They were, you remember, resurrection -women, 
 who had promised to procure a child's body for some young 
 suro-eons. Being upon honour to their employers, rather 
 than disappoint the evening lecture of the students, they 
 stole a live child, murdered it, and sold the body for three 
 shillings and sixpence. They were hanged, but for the 
 murder not for the plagium. Your civil law has carried 
 you a little too far." But Mr. Pleydell's statement of the 
 law as it then stood was sound, and Glossin, as we shall 
 see, was wrong. Torrence and Waldie's case was not the 
 sole authority. 
 
 The eminent Sir George Mackenzie, treating of " Some 
 Crimes punished amongst the Bomans, which are not 
 directly in use with us," observes : " Plagium was the 
 stealing of Men, and was punishable by death, which 
 agrees with the Law of God, Exod. xxl. 16, Deut. xxlv. 7. 
 And with us Egyptians and others stealing Children have 
 been Hkewise punished by death, and such as force away 
 Men to be Souldiers should be lyable to the same Punish- 
 ment, though the Council uses to punish them only by 
 an arbitrary punishment ; and such as take away men's 
 Children upon pretext to marry them, before they come 
 to the years wherein they may give a legal Consent 
 (which is 12 in Women and 14 in Men), ought in my 
 judgement to be so punished." {a) The crim.en plagii of 
 the Boman law might be committed either by selling a 
 free man into slavery, which was a capital crime, or by 
 enticing, conceahng, or buying the slave of another, whereof 
 the punishment was at first pecuniary by the lex Flavia, 
 and afterwards discretionary, according to the degree of 
 
 (a) Laws and Customs of Scotland in Matters Criminal, Part 1. tit. 36. 
 
PLAGIUM 31 
 
 the fault .(a) In modern practice ^9^a^mm or the theft 
 of a human being applies only to young children. The 
 penalty is incurred whether the child be enticed away or 
 carried off by force, and whatever be the motive. Sentence 
 of imprisonment varies with the degree of guilt.(6) In 
 former times, however, on the theory that it was a 
 treasonable usurpation of the Royal authority in detain- 
 ing the King's free lieges without his licence or commission, 
 it was punishable with death. (c) 
 
 Thus, as appears from the official records, on 12th January 
 1604, George Meldrum, younger of Dumbreck, who was 
 charged with invading, taking captive and carrying away 
 three persons, including Mr. Alexander Gibson of Durle, 
 one of the Clerks of Session, whom he conveyed out of Fife 
 by Kinghorn and Edinburgh, through Lothian, and by 
 Melrose into England, being convicted, was sentenced to be 
 beheaded at the Cross of Edinburgh and his estate forfeited 
 to the Crown. On 23rd November 1649, Lieutenant Mark 
 Ker and others were pursued for the rapt and taking away 
 of Robert Cunninghame, a boy of fourteen, from the pos- 
 session of his uncle and tutor, Harry Cunninghame. The 
 libel was sent to an assize after debate on the title of the 
 uncle to pursue, which was sustained. On 4th July 1664, 
 James, Viscount Frendi-aught, was indicted for carrying off 
 and detaining in a private prison, Alexander Gregory of 
 Netherdale, and for the nmrder of the said Mr. Alexander, 
 or being art and part of these crimes, and the libel was 
 found relevant, though the pannel was assoilzied. On 25th 
 March 1720, occurred the very curious and interesting case 
 of Sir Alexander Anstruther of Newark, which, as I propose 
 to deal with it later and at length, may meantime be passed 
 over. On 18th December 1727, David Colquhoun, maltman 
 in Dumbarton, and William Buntine, son of William 
 Buntine of Auchendennan, accused at the instance of John 
 
 (a) Dig. lib. 48, tit. 15, 1. 1.6.7. 
 
 (6) Macdonald's Criminal Law, p. 24, and authorities there cited. 
 
 (c) Hume on Grimes, 1819, i. 82. 
 
32 PLAGIUM 
 
 Campbell and John Ewing, wrights, burgesses of said 
 burg-h, and Archibald Porterfield, another burgess, were 
 charged with assaulting and trying to carry off Campbell 
 and Ewing from an election, but failing in the attempt 
 they cruelly beat, bruised, and wounded them ; and actually 
 carrying off Porterfield by putting him on board a boat, 
 swearing him to secrecy, and lodging him in the house of 
 Levenside, locked up in a room, and thereafter taking him 
 to one of the islands of Loch Lomond, and keeping him 
 there until the election was over, when he was set at liberty. 
 The Court found the libel respecting the carrying off of 
 Porterfield and keeping him under restraint relevant to 
 infer an arbitrary punishment, damages and expenses ; but 
 the charge was found not proven. These doings at Dum- 
 barton are even more remarkable than the electioneering 
 amenities of Eatanswill. 
 
 The next case upon record is that cited by Glossin : 
 His Majesty's Advocate against Helen Torrence and Jean 
 Waldie : of which a brief report is given by Maclaurin in 
 his instructive treatise, (a) A more particular account of 
 the circumstances is contained in the Scots Magazine for 
 February 1752.(6) It appears from these authorities that 
 Torrence and AValdie were brought to trial on 3rd February 
 1752 for the crimes of plagium and murder, committed 
 upon the person of John Dallas, a boy of eight or nine 
 years of age, son of a chairman in Edinburgh. The women 
 were sick nurses of the school of Mesdames Gamp and Prig. 
 In the preceding November they undertook to procure for 
 certain apprentice-surgeons a suitable subject ; they were 
 to sit up with a dead child, and proposed at the coffining 
 to substitute something for the body. The parents of the 
 subject, however, prevented the completion of this plan. 
 For some time the two hags had the boy Dallas under 
 observation ; he was ailing, and in the opinion of Torrence, 
 
 (a) Argu'iiients and Decisions in Remarkable Cases, pp. 152-153. 
 (6) Vol. xiv. pp. 98-99. 
 
PLAGIUM 33 
 
 if he were to die " would be a good subject for the doctors." 
 Repeated inquiries as to his health found him no worse, 
 and Torrence, becoming impatient, resolved to assist nature. 
 On 3rd December Mrs. Dallas called upon her, presumably 
 to thank her for the interest she took in the case. Waldie, 
 who lived in the flat above, happened to be present. She 
 went up to her own house and knocked on the floor, 
 whereupon Torrence followed her up and after a short 
 consultation returned to her visitor, whom she invited to 
 a neighbouring tavern to drink to the invalid's recovery. 
 While the mother's attention was thus engaged Waldie 
 went to her place of abode, found the boy looking over the 
 window for his mother's return, took him up in her arms, 
 and carried him "in her gown-tail" to her own house, 
 where she was immediately joined by Torrence. They 
 confessed that they then choked the child by a forcible 
 administration of ale. So soon as he was dead they went 
 to inform the young surgeons that they now had a subject 
 for them. The apprentices came, saw the body, and offered 
 two shillings for it. The hags protested against the in- 
 adequacy of the remuneration, " declaring that they had 
 been at more expenses about it than that sum " ; but when 
 the lads increased their ofier by " tenpence to buy a dram," 
 the bargain was closed, and Torrence carried the body in 
 her apron to their rooms, for which she received a bonus of 
 sixpence. The parents raised a hue and cry for the missing 
 child, and four days later the body, bearing evident marks 
 of having been in anatomical hands, was found " in a place 
 of the town little frequented." The parents were arrested, 
 and subsequently the two women. The apprentices told 
 their tale, the parents were released, and the women 
 committed for trial. 
 
 When the case came before the High Court on 3rd 
 February, counsel for the pannels represented that al- 
 though the actual murder might be relevant to infer the 
 pains of death, the stealing of the child could only infer 
 an arbitrary punishment ; and as to the selling of the dead 
 
34 PLAGIUM 
 
 body, it was no crime at all. (a) To this it was answered 
 that though the stealing of the child when alive, disjoined 
 from the selling of it when dead, might not go so far, 
 yet when taken together they were undoubtedly relevant 
 to infer a capital punishment. The Court found the libel 
 relevant, and after proof, which included the evidence of 
 the child's parents and of the apprentice-surgeons, the 
 jury returned the following special verdict: "Find that 
 the pannels are both guilty art and part of stealing 
 John Dallas, a living child, and son of John Dallas, 
 chairman in Edinburgh, from his father's house at the 
 time and in the manner libelled ; and of carrying him 
 to the house of Jean Waldie, one of the pannels ; and 
 soon thereafter, on the evening of the day libelled, of 
 selling and delivering his body, then dead, to some 
 surgeons and students of physic." Counsel having been 
 heard on the import of this verdict, the Court repelled all 
 the objections taken. Helen Torrence then "pleaded her 
 belly" in arrest of judgment ; upon which four midwives 
 were appointed to examine as to her condition. These 
 experts having reported that she was not with child, the 
 Court adjudged her and the other prisoner to be hanged 
 in common form. They were accordingly executed in 
 the Grassmarket on 18th March. "Both acknowledged 
 their sins, and mentioned uncleanness and drunkenness 
 in particular." 
 
 The case of Sir Alexander Anstruther to which I have 
 referred is in many respects remarkable and worthy of 
 notice. Though interesting and important it has left little 
 mark upon the law books ; only one or two brief references 
 to it are made by our criminal writers, (?>) and it may 
 well have escaped the learned eye of Mr. Glossin. Apart 
 from the singularity of the charge and the picturesque 
 quality of the evidence, the social and professional status 
 of the principal accused is in such a connection unusual ; 
 
 (a) Comfortable words these for Messrs. Burke and Hare. 
 (6) Hume, ii. 113 ; Burnett, pp. 109, 385. 
 
PLAGIUM 35 
 
 one seldom sees a knight, an advocate, and an official of 
 the Court of Session involved in a criminal prosecution. 
 The printed report of the proceedings, too, is rare ; 
 the small quarto pamphlet of fifty-one pages, to which 
 I am indebted for the facts, was at one time in the posses- 
 sion of James Maidment, the antiquary, who describes 
 it on the fly-leaf as " a very scarce Scottish Tryal," and 
 indeed I have never come across another copy. The title 
 page reads as follows: "The Criminal Process At the 
 Instance of Edward Copinger and Henr}^ Cowie, Sailers, 
 and His Majesty's Advocate ; against Sir Alexander 
 Anstruther of Newark, and James Black. Taken from 
 the Books of Adjournal. Edinburgh, Printed by James 
 Watson, His Majesty's Printer. 1720." 
 
 The protagonist was a scion of the ancient and honour- 
 able house of Anstruther of that ilk, one of the oldest 
 families in Fife. His father, Sir Philip Anstruther of 
 Anstruther, nephew and heir to that Sir William who 
 had been a gentleman of the bedchamber to James the 
 Sixth, was knighted by Charles the Second at Scone in 
 1650. A zealous Poyalist, he was taken prisoner at 
 Worcester, and his estates were sequestrated until the 
 Restoration. He had seven sons, of whom two were 
 baronets of Nova Scotia, and three were knights. The 
 creation of Nova Scotia baronets, a pleasant device of 
 King Jamie for raising the wind, ceased on the union of 
 the Crowns. (a) The members of this distinguished brother- 
 hood with whom we have to do are Sir Alexander of 
 Newark, Sir Philip of Anstrutherfield, Sir Kobert of 
 Balcaskie, and Sir John of Anstruther, who seemino-ly 
 succeeded his father in the estates. Wood remarks that 
 John "probably died before 1690"; but he was alive 
 and in the enjoyment of the lands and barony in 1720, 
 as appears from the record of the trial. (6) A family so 
 
 (a) " I ken the man weel ; he's one of my thirty-pound knights." — Eastward 
 Hoe, Act IV. Sc. i. 
 
 (6) Wood's East Neuk of Fife, pp. 359-360. 
 
36 PLAGIUM 
 
 handsomely endowed with titles and of such criminous 
 proclivities recalls the bad Baronets of Ruddigore. Sir 
 Alexander, with whose amiable eccentricities we are chiefly 
 concerned, was Sir Philip's fifth son. Admitted a member 
 of the Faculty of Advocates in December 1 692, he was 
 later appointed Principal Clerk of the Bills. He had a 
 charter, 23rd June 1704 (confirmed 12th February 1722), 
 from Sir George Brown of Coalstoun, Knight Baronet, 
 with consent of his spouse, of the lands of Newtonleys, 
 in the county of Haddington. In another charter of 
 1728 he is designed brother german of the deceased Sir 
 Philip Anstruther of Anstrutherfield.(a) This, apart from 
 the legal proceedings of which he was the subject, is all 
 that I have been able to glean anent Sir Alexander. 
 
 The prosecution is in the form of Criminal Letters, the 
 private prosecutors or complainers being Edward Copinger 
 and Henry Cowie, sailors, late on board the ship Anne and 
 Margaret of Leven, with concurrence of Sir David Dalrymple 
 of Hailes, Baronet, his Majesty's Advocate, against Sir 
 Alexander Anstruther of Newark, advocate, one of the 
 Principal Clerks to the Bills, James Black, skipper and 
 master of the said ship, and Bailie James Graham of 
 Anstruther, accused "of the most atrocious Crimes of 
 Hamesucken, Plagium or Man-stealing, and gross Oppres- 
 sion." The facts as stated in the charge are briefly these : 
 Sir Alexander, who for some time past, over and above his 
 professional and oflicial duties, " dealt in foreign Trade as a 
 Merchant," had an interest in the voyage of the Anne and 
 Margaret, which in the spring of 1719 sailed from the 
 Firth of Forth with a cargo of salt " for Ports beyond Sea." 
 On the return of the ship to Scotland in the autumn 
 "Brandy in prohibited Casks" was seized aboard her by 
 the Custom-house ofl^cers, and two of the crew, Copinger 
 and Cowie, were examined before the Barons of Exchequer 
 as to the " clandestine Importation " of the spirits. The 
 
 (a) Riddle's Baronetage of Scotland, MSS. Advocates Library, vol. viii. 
 p. 114. 
 
PLAGIUM 37 
 
 knight, the skipper, and the bailie, who were jointly interested 
 in this unlawful venture, perceiving that Copinger and 
 Cowie " might be made Use of as Witnesses in a judicial 
 Trial for discovering and punishing the said Frauds and 
 Imbezelments," determined " to withdraw the Complainers 
 as Evidences and disappoint the Effect of their Testimonies." 
 In pursuance of this natural but illegitimate purpose the 
 three merchant adventurers, having traced the intended 
 witnesses to Crawfordsdyke in Renfrew, " upon the River 
 of Glide," whither they had retired for rest and privacy, 
 came accoutred with swords, pistols, " or other invasive 
 Weapons," about midnight on Saturday, 27th November 
 1719, to the change-house of that village, where the two 
 sailors were "sitting in a peaceable Manner, preparing to 
 go to Bed." After threatening the inmates with a pistol, 
 the party forcibly seized and carried off the mariners, 
 dragged them on board a boat, and so " transported them 
 from Place to Place through the Country, sometimes under 
 Cloud of Night ; and unlawfully confined them as Prisoners 
 for several Weeks " in the houses of Newark, Anstruther- 
 field, and Balcaskie, from which imprisonment Cowie 
 ultimately escaped, and Copinger was liberated at the 
 instance of the Crown authorities. 
 
 It appears from a note on the report that " Tho' the 
 Criminal Letters are raised against Bailie James Graham of 
 Anstruther, yet he could not be got in due Time cited to 
 the 25th of March, which was the Day appointed for the 
 Trial." Hence the bailie's non-appearance at the bar along 
 with his brother bandits. A formidable array of counsel 
 was engaged in the proceedings, Walter Stewart, Advocate- 
 Depute, with Charles Erskine, Kobert Craigie and Peter 
 Wedderburn, conducted the prosecution; Sir James Stewart, 
 Alexander Hay, James Gordon and John Forbes appeared 
 for the defence. Erskine, as Solicitor-General, in 1736 
 assisted in the prosecution of the celebrated Captain 
 Porteous ; Sir James Stewart was the son of the Lord 
 Advocate Stewart invidiously known as " Wily Jamie." 
 
38 PLAGIUM 
 
 Copinger and Cowie were not examined as witnesses, 
 their evidence being adduced in the form of an affidavit 
 made by them on 7th October 1719, which deals only with 
 the question of the smuggled brandy. In this document 
 the complainers set forth on oath that in the beginning of 
 May last they were hired by Sir Alexander Anstruther to 
 sail in the Anne and Margaret from Scotland to Hamburg. 
 At Pittenweem the ship took on board 80 or 90 tons of 
 foreign salt. She then sailed round to St. Andrews Bay, 
 " betwixt Grail and the Red Head," where 60 or 70 tons 
 of the cargo were landed in fishing hoats, the master and 
 mate superintending the trans-shipment. She next sailed 
 for St. Martins in France, where the remainder of the cargo 
 was landed, after which she left in ballast for Bordeaux, 
 where a cargo of wine and brandy was shipped, which they 
 understood was for Scotland, " tho' they were all caution'd 
 by the Master (in case there was need) to say. That they 
 were bound for Bergen in Norway." From Bordeaux they 
 returned to St. Martins, where they re-shipped the salt 
 previously landed, and being thus loaded began their home- 
 ward voyage. When the ship reached the Forth about 
 the end of August, " there was a Man sent on Shore to 
 St. Andrews to give Notice thereof." On the two following 
 nights "eight Boats were loaded out of the said Ship with 
 Quarter Casks of Brandy, and sent on Shore," the son and 
 son-in-law of Bailie Low of St. Monans having charge of 
 the boats, and the captain and mate checking the casks. 
 
 Among other documentary evidence produced by the 
 complainers was a Custom-house Certificate of Cargo of 
 the Anne and Margaret on her outward voyage, which 
 bore that she sailed for Danzig on 25th May 1719 with 
 1657 bushels of foreign salt for account of Sir Alexander 
 Anstruther ; a Certificate of Seizure of 462 casks, con- 
 taining 4700 gallons of brandy, " being prohibited to be 
 imported " ; a Warrant for apprehending Sir Alexander 
 and his co-partners, upon which they were imprisoned in 
 the Tolbooth of Edinburgh ; and a Warrant for liberating 
 
PLAGIUM 39 
 
 the prisoners, they having found sufficient caution that they 
 would stand their triaL Appended to the Criminal Letters 
 was a list of 51 witnesses in support of the charge, of whom, 
 however, only 20 were called. The indictment was laid 
 both at common law and on the clause of the Act 1701, 
 c. 6, anent wrongous imprisonment, and concluded for fine, 
 deprivation of office, and incapacity of public trust. 
 
 On 25th March 1720, " when this Libel was called 
 before the High Court of Justiciary, the Procurators for 
 the Pannels offered some Objections against the Relevancy 
 and also some Grounds of Exculpation, and insisted on 
 several Pretences and Excuses for the Pannels ; To which 
 Answers being made, Parties were ordained to inform." 
 The Informations, or written pleadings for the parties, are 
 not less lengthy than learned. It was argued for the 
 defence that what occurred at Crawfordsdyke amounted 
 to no more than a common riot ; that there was nothing 
 in the nature of Hamesucken, "since they [the pursuers] 
 were not dragged from their own Dwelling-house"; nor 
 of Plagium, " since it was not luc7'i faciendi causa, and 
 in order to sell them into Slavery." The pursuers were 
 detained by the defenders as " necessary Witnesses for 
 proving an Exculpation in case of a Trial of the Frauds 
 alleged to have been committed." Their confinement could 
 not come under the Statute, which had no concern with 
 imprisonments made by private persons in privato carcere. 
 It was further pleaded in exculpation that no violence was 
 used to the pursuers at Crawfordsdyke, and even had such 
 been employed, " yet that was taken off and remitted by 
 their going voluntarily along all the rest of the journey," 
 during which they had several opportunities to escape had 
 they been so minded. 
 
 To this it was answered that in view of the "black and 
 detestable" character of the crimes charged, the pannels 
 ought to be thankful that they were no worse off, there 
 being " good Reason for heightening the Punishment to a 
 higher Pitch than is here done." Hamesucken was com- 
 
40 PLAGIUM 
 
 mitted, as the pursuers were invaded by men In arms in 
 their quarters at Crawfordsdyke, where the}'- had for some 
 time resided. As to Plagium, the motive was " the saving, 
 if possible, the Reputation of the Pannels and their Cargo, 
 by putting them [the pursuers] out of the Way, either by 
 sending them as Slaves to foreign Countries or disposing 
 of them in a worse Manner." The effect of the Act 1701 
 " is the same as to Restraint of personal Liberty both 
 with regard to those clothed with publick Authority, and 
 private Persons ; the Injury to the Person is the same, 
 and the Affront in the last Case is higher." As to the 
 facts : threats and violence were used in carrying the 
 pursuers out of the house to the boat ; they remonstrated 
 against that violence and " expressed their Griefs " to 
 divers persons by the way ; the pannels guarded them 
 as prisoners, riding before and behind them ; Copinger 
 offered money to one of the servants to inform the Sheriff 
 of their plight ; the later separation of the prisoners "and 
 shifting their Residence in the Night-time, is an undeniable 
 Mark that all these Doings were the Works of Darkness " ; 
 and finally, Cowie's escape, and Copinger's liberation only 
 in consequence of a complaint against Sir Alexander and 
 upon a Bail-bond for his appearance given by Sir Philip 
 under a high penalty to produce him, confirmed the truth 
 of the indictment. 
 
 On 1st April the Lord Justice-Clerk (Adam Cockburn 
 of Ormistoun) and the other Lords of Justiciary, having 
 heard parties, pronounced an interlocutor finding (l) the 
 invasion and threats at Crawfordsdyke, (2) the forcible 
 carrying-off and putting on board the boat, and (3) the 
 detention under restraint in the houses of Newark, Bal- 
 caskie and others, each relevant to infer an arbitrary 
 punishment, and in the last case, damages and expenses 
 also ; repelled the defenders' whole objections ; and remitted 
 the libel, as found relevant, to the knowledge of an assize. 
 On 4th April a jury was accordingly empannelled, which 
 included such " representative " Edinburgh citizens as Sir 
 
PLAGIUM 41 
 
 James Kochead of Inverleith (who, being himself a Nova 
 Scotia baronet, may be supposed to have had some 
 sympathy with the principal offender), and William Ged, 
 goldsmith, the inventor of printing from stereotype plates. 
 The prosecutors then adduced their proof 
 
 Elizabeth Kelburn, spouse to Robert Sinclair, Inn- 
 keeper in Crawfordsdyke, with whom Copinger and Cowie 
 had lodged, stated that between 11 and 12 o'clock on 
 the night in question certain strange men came to her 
 house and knocked civilly at the door, which was bolted. 
 When she drew the bolt they rushed into the house 
 and seized hold of her lodgers, who were sitting by 
 the fire making ready for bed. On her remonstrating 
 one of the invaders, producing a pistol, "desired the 
 Deponent to hold her Peace, for that should be her 
 Portion." They then took their prey by the arms and 
 carried them out ; Cowie had taken off his stockings, 
 and next morning her son found Copinger's hat lying 
 on the quay. She could not identify the pannels as her 
 invasive visitors, " there having been no Candle-light 
 in the House, nor other Light except the Light of the 
 Fire." 
 
 Richard Graham, merchant in Glasgow, said that in 
 November last he was desired by Sir Alexander and 
 Skipper Black " to provide a Boat and some Men to the 
 Key of Crawfordsdyke for carrying off the Pursuers 
 Copinger and Cowie," which he did, and was present 
 when they were taken prisoner at Sinclair's house. Both 
 pannels were armed, and he saw Black threaten the 
 woman with a pistol. Bailie Graham was also of the 
 party. The captives were marched down to the quay ; 
 " it being dark he did not see them put aboard the 
 Boat," but he heard a cry of " Murder ! " and another cry 
 "desiring them to stop his Mouth." He also heard 
 " a OTeat Strusfsle and Noise " durino^ the embarkation. 
 As the boat put off, he, rather gratuitously, " wished 
 them a good Voyage." Witness believed that neither of 
 
42 PLAGIUM 
 
 the men " would have gone away if they could have 
 shunned it." 
 
 James Boyd, sailor and a neighbour of Sinclair, heard 
 " a Noise of Feet, and saw a Bulk of People together 
 which went down the Key, and heard a Voice crying 
 ' Murder,' and a Voice crying, ' Toss them into the Boat,' 
 and did see a Boat go oif from the Shore." 
 
 James Smith, another neighbour, " was designing to 
 go to Bed," when he heard the cry and the trampling 
 of feet. He took a lantern and went down to the quay, 
 where he heard the sound of oars and also " Strokes 
 given, but whether they were upon a Man's Back or not 
 he cannot tell." 
 
 John Spiers, merchant in Greenock, said that on the 
 day on which Cowie and Copinger were captured he was 
 " in a Company at New Port-Glasgow " — presumably mean- 
 ing in a public-house — when Skipper Black and one who 
 resembled Sir Alexander were present. One of them 
 asked him " if he knew that two Stranger Sailers, who 
 were employed by the Commissioners of the Customs, 
 were at Crawfordsdyke ? " He replied " that the said 
 Strangers lodged in Mrs. Sinclair's." 
 
 So much for the seizure at Crawfordsdyke ; the captives 
 were rowed across the Clyde, and the story is taken up 
 by witnesses from the other shore. Elizabeth Porterfield, 
 spouse to Alexander Porterfield in Hill of Ardmore, said 
 that about midnight, her household being abed, there came 
 to her door some boatmen of New Port-Glasgow, with five 
 other persons, three of whom "looked like Gentlemen," 
 and called for lights and a fire. One of the other two 
 complained of a hurt knee, having been " taken uncivilly 
 from his Quarters." The boatmen addressed one of the 
 gentlemen as Mr. Black. They remained till the next 
 morning, when they left for the Ferry of Bonhill. 
 
 William Lindsay, " Ferrier at the Boat of Bonhill," 
 said that the pannels and some others, five in all, came 
 to his house about 10 a.m. and asked for a room. He 
 
PLAGIUM 43 
 
 identified Copinger and said that he wrote his name, 
 Edward Copinger, with chalk upon the back of a bed, 
 but Black came in with pistols " and rolled out the name." 
 Copinger complained of a sore knee which he had got 
 by being forced aboard a boat, and gave witness his keys 
 to deUver to the Collector of Customs at Greenock. That 
 evening there came a servant of Sir Alexander with four 
 horses, and next day, being Sunday, other two horses 
 were hired by Sir Alexander from witness for the prisoners' 
 use. Copinger said that if he was to be treated as he 
 had been the night before, " he would not go along 
 with them although he were dragged," and Sir Alexander 
 assured him that he need fear no harm. The party 
 then set out for Drymen, the captives riding the two 
 hired mounts. 
 
 John Stewart, Bonhill, who was in Lindsay's house, 
 corroborated. 
 
 Andrew Miller, maltman in Drymen, said that the 
 pannels hired two horses from him " the Length of Airth " 
 for Copinger and Cowie. Witness accompanied the party 
 to bring his horses back. At Mill of Touch Copinger 
 offered him a guinea to go to Stirling and ask the magis- 
 trates to rescue him, but witness declined to meddle in 
 the matter. 
 
 James Telfer, Sir Alexander's man, said that by his 
 master's orders he brought the horses to Bonhill. He 
 went with the party to Drymen, and so by Mill of Touch 
 to Airth; "thence to Higgins-nook, where they boated 
 all the foresaid Persons, and landed at Kincardine ; and 
 from thence they came to Anstrutherfield on Monday, 
 about 6 or 7 a Clock at Night." Horses were hired for 
 the captives' use from Bonhill to Drymen, and from thence 
 to Airth ; those hired at Airth " were carried over the 
 Water with them " to Kincardine. (The hiring of the 
 several horses was also established by other witnesses.) 
 After staying a night at Anstrutherfield the prisoners 
 were removed to Newark, where "the Deponent every 
 
44 PLAGIUM 
 
 Night he lay in the Room with the Complainers, bolted 
 the Door on the Inside." 
 
 Sir Philip Anstruther of Anstrutherfield gave evidence 
 as to the granting of a Bail-bond by him for the production 
 of Copinger. He instructed Bailie Murray of St. Monans 
 to enquire for the missing witness ; the bailie, who " had 
 been at some Pains to find him out," ultimately produced 
 him up to time, and the Bail-bond was discharged. Sir 
 Philip was asked no questions as to the scene of Copinger's 
 sequestration. 
 
 Anne Kilgour, maidservant at Newark, said that she 
 saw Copinger and Cowie in a room there several times 
 in November and December last. She had seen Telfer in 
 the chamber with them and sometimes found the door 
 locked. 
 
 William Galloway, servant at Newark, saw the com- 
 plainers brought there by Sir Alexander and Black. " For 
 the most Part they kept their Room." After a few days 
 Sir Alexander ordered witness to take Cowie " in the Night- 
 time to the House of Balcaskie," which, accompanied by his 
 fellow-servants Steedman and Knox, he accordingly did, 
 delivered him to John Fairfoul, servant to Sir Robert 
 Anstruther, and saw him put in a room there. Some days 
 later the same three men by Sir Alexander's orders " rode 
 along with Copinger to the House of Ardross, likewise in 
 the Nig-ht-time," and dehvered him to John Lorimer, 
 servant to Sir John Anstruther of that Ilk. After Cowie's 
 escape from Balcaskie, Sir Alexander ordered them to 
 remove Copinger from Ardross " to the House of Craighall 
 in the Night-time and on the same manner," where he was 
 delivered " to a Maid of the House and was carried up to a 
 Room." After remaining there some days he was by Sir 
 Alexander's orders brought back to Newark, where " he 
 staid in his Room as in the former Time," until his libera- 
 tion at the instance of the Crown authorities. 
 
 Robert Steedman and Robert Knox, both Sir Alexander's 
 servants, corroborated. They relieved each other and Telfer 
 
PLAGIUM 45 
 
 in "laying with the Complainers" at night at their various 
 places of pilgrimage. 
 
 John Lorimer, Sir John's servant, said that at Ardross 
 Oopinger was kept in a room about eight days. He was 
 locked in, except when Steedman lay with him, who told 
 witness "he had Instructions to take Care that Copinger 
 should not escape." 
 
 John Fairfoul, Sir Robert's man, said he put Cowie in a 
 room at Balcaskie, " in which Room he continued for Eight 
 or Ten Days, during which Space he neither went abroad 
 from the House nor from one Room to another." Witness 
 locked him in at night, but " at last he made his Escape 
 out of the said House by pulling off the Lock which was 
 upon the Chamber-door, and got away betwixt going away 
 of Day-light and the lighting of Candle." The servants 
 went in search of him but could not find him. 
 
 Thomas Dobie, a fellow-servant, corroborated. Cowie 
 was locked in his room and Fairfoul kept the key. He 
 added that Cowie had offered him half a guinea if he would 
 go and tell his wife where he was detained, " but he 
 [witness] refused to accept the Commission." 
 
 This closed the complainers' proof, and the defence 
 offered no evidence. The addresses of counsel are not 
 recorded. As it was not then the practice for the pre- 
 siding judge to charge the jury — a custom initiated by 
 Lord Kames at the trial of Katharine Nairn in 1765, (a) 
 — we have not the advantage of a judicial summing up of 
 the evidence ; but to me it humbly appears that the com- 
 plainers had fully established their case. Nevertheless 
 the jury did, upon 4th April, "by Plurality of Voices 
 find the first and second Parts of the Interlocutor not 
 proven," i.e. the charges relating to the violent seizure at 
 Crawfordsdyke, and the forcible embarkation there ; "and 
 with one Voice find it proven. That the Complainers were 
 carried from the Boat of Bonhill through the Country to 
 
 (a) Twelve Scots Trials, p. 128. 
 
46 PLAGIUM 
 
 the Shire of Fife by the Pannels, likewise that Mr. Cowie 
 was detained under Restraint in the house of Balcaskie, 
 but we do not find the Restraint to have been by the 
 Pannel's Orders " ! 
 
 This amazing verdict must surely have been the subject 
 of debate, but the report contains nothing further than the 
 interlocutor of Court, pronounced on 15th April, by which 
 the pannels were assoilzied and dismissed from the bar. 
 I should like to have had a word with my respectable 
 kinsman, Sir James Rochead, as to the jury's finding ; I 
 can only hope that at least he voted in the minority. 
 
 One wonders how Sir Alexander and his myrmidons 
 proposed to deal with their prisoners had the one not 
 been rescued from their clutches and the other effected 
 his escape. The Information for the complainers darkly 
 hints that "the w^orst was to be suspected, if by good 
 Providence the Contrivance had not been seasonably found 
 out and disappointed." The excuse urged for the pannels 
 that in acting as they did they were merely safeguarding 
 their own witnesses so as to prevent them being " got at " 
 by the Revenue officials, is sufficiently ludicrous ; but 
 they can hardly have been prepared, in their zeal for the 
 suppression of evidence, to go the length of murder. 
 
 Whether or not any further steps were taken against 
 them on the smuggling charge I have been unable to 
 discover. Those were spacious days, and it is probable 
 that Sir Alexander's reputation with the sporting baronets 
 who formed his family circle in no wise suffered from 
 his devotion to the Free Trade principles ; while among his 
 brethren of the Parliament House his professional standing 
 may even have been enhanced by reason of his unique 
 experience in criminal practice, and his familiarity with 
 both sides of the bar. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND: 
 
 A FAMILIAR SUEVEY OF POISONING, AS PRACTISED 
 IN THAT REALM 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND: 
 
 A Familiar Survey of Poisoning, as Practised 
 IN THAT Realm 
 
 Fie on these dealers in poison, say I ; can they not keep to the old honest 
 way of cutting throats, without introducing such abominable innovations from 
 Italy ? 
 
 — On Murder, Considered as one of the Fine Arta. 
 
 TT is strange that a critic so acute as De Quincey, while 
 -*- extolling the rude methods of the mere manslayer, 
 should hold in light esteem the poisoner's delicate and 
 nimble art. Such attaching cases as that of Miss Blandy 
 or of Captain Donellan shall never, he protests, have any 
 countenance from him ; and the instance which he selects 
 as a palmary example of the purest and most perfect style 
 is that of the savage Williams, who exterminated with a 
 carpenter's maul two whole families in Ratcliffe Highway. 
 As in the case of other artists before and since, quantity 
 rather than quality seems to have been Mr. Williams' note, 
 and his best bit of work was his last — the lianQ-ina; of 
 himself in a prison cell with his own braces. 
 
 Regard being had to the relatively rare occurrence of 
 poisoning in Scotland, it would appear that De Quincey 's 
 view was largely held by local exponents of the homicidal 
 cult. Possibly the national sense of thrift counted for 
 something in the matter ; drugs were dear and hard to come 
 by, but the meanest could command a knife. Be that as 
 it may, one of our chief connoisseurs, King -James the Sixth, 
 followed his native bent in employing the stake, the dagger 
 and the gibbet for the elimination of such of his Scots 
 subjects as were repugnant to the Royal pleasure — compare 
 his unnumbered witch-burnings, passim, and the butchery 
 of the Cowrie boys at Perth. Not until His Majesty 
 enjoyed the refining influence of the Ttalianate Court of 
 
 49 4 
 
50 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 England did Prince Henry eat at Woodstock the impoisoned 
 grapes, and Sir Thomas Overbury die lingeringly in the 
 Tower, attended by the King's mediciner, after a liberal 
 exhibition of realgar, mercury, white arsenic, and dust of 
 diamonds. The last named sounds the most attractive, but 
 doubtless it was all one to the patient : " What would it 
 pleasure me," asks the Duchess of her murderer in Webster's 
 great tragedy, " What would it pleasure me to have my 
 throat cut with diamonds ? or to be smothered with cassia ? 
 or to be shot to death with pearls ? " Queen Mary, so 
 amazingly James's mother, a princess, by reason of her 
 French upbringing and natural gifts, infinitely superior to 
 the gang of noble ruffians about her throne, wrote to 
 Bothwell once, deprecating his crude purpose of blowing 
 up her petulant spouse with gunpowder: "Advise to with 
 zourself gif ze can find out ony mair secreit inventioun by 
 medicine, for he suld tak medicine and the bath at Craig- 
 millar." Poison, she wisely implies, would make less noise 
 than powder ; but the hint was thrown away upon the 
 rude Borderer, and more than Darnley was exploded at 
 Kirk o' Field. 
 
 For the curious in homicidal pharmacy the accounts of 
 early cases preserved in our records are provokingly scant. 
 This is due as well to the ignorance of the amateur 
 practitioner, as to the ineptitude of physicians in failing 
 to detect him in his interesting pursuit. The pioneer of 
 poisoning groped his way, as it were, in a scientific wilder- 
 ness, where was "nor path nor friendly clue to be his 
 guide," while the professed man of medicine was better 
 versed in the mysteries of the heavenly, than in those of 
 merely human bodies. The first Scots Act to recognise the 
 crime of poisoning as such is that of 1450, (a) whereby all 
 persons are forbidden under pain of treason to bring home 
 poison for any use by which any Christian man or woman 
 may take bodily harm. " But notwithstanding of these 
 
 (a) 7 James II. c. 31 and 32. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 51 
 
 words," observes Sir George Mackenzie, "Apothecaries and 
 others do daily bring home Poyson " ; indeed, whatever 
 the Legislature might intend, the Statute was practically 
 a dead letter, for he adds, " I find no instances in the 
 Journal Books where any have been convict as Traitors 
 upon this account. "(a) Thus the provision was of no 
 benefit to poisoners, who suffered on the scaffold the com- 
 mon doom of homicides, without the added distinction of 
 mutilation and dismemberment. 
 
 Passing such hazy instances as the suspected poisoning 
 of Margaret Drummond, mistress of James the Fourth, in 
 April 1502, the earliest case of the kind in our records is 
 that of the Lady Glammis. Jean Douglas, grand-daughter 
 of " Bell-the-Cat " and sister of Archibald, sixth Earl of 
 Angus, a lady famous alike for beauty and virtue, had 
 provoked the wrath of James the Fifth by her attachment to 
 her brothers, the banished Douglases, of whom the King had 
 sworn that while he lived they should never find refuge in 
 Scotland. As the only member of her family on whom the 
 Royal hands could be laid, Lady Glammis was rancorously 
 harried by divers criminal prosecutions, and finally, upon 
 false evidence, done to death. Her first husband, John, Lord 
 Glammis, having died in 1527, she had married a Campbell. 
 In 1532 she was indicted for taking the life of her former 
 spouse "j9er intoxicationem'' : contriving his death not, as 
 might appear, by driving him to drink, but by means of 
 drugs, charms and enchanted potions. The lords and lairds 
 summoned as jurymen upon her trial, believing her innocent, 
 refused the office ; they were fined and the proceedings 
 dropped. (6) Five years later, however, the attack was 
 renewed in another form. One William Lyon, who unsuc- 
 cessfully had sought her favours, was found to bear false 
 witness against her; in July 1537 she was tried and con- 
 victed, upon what evidence we do not know, for conspiring 
 to destroy the King " be poysone," and for treasonably 
 
 («) Laivs and Customs of Scotland in Matters Criminal, tit. viii. 
 (6) Pitcairn's Criminal Trials in Scotland, i. 157--', 158*. 
 
52 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 assisting her Douglas brothers. (a) The judges delayed 
 sentence, and represented the case to His Majesty as one 
 meriting the Royal mercy ; but James was not inclined to 
 be clement — the law must take its course. So the hapless 
 lady was burnt alive upon the Castle Hill of Edinburgh, 
 "with great commiseration of the people, in regaird of her 
 noble blood and singular beautie."(fe) Her husband, in 
 attempting to escape from the Castle, fell down the rocks 
 and was killed ; her son, the young Lord, was kept a 
 prisoner till the King's death. The traditional belief that 
 Lady Glammis suffered for witchcraft is erroneous : she died 
 a victim to political spite, " as I can perceyve," Sir Thomas 
 Clifford, the English Ambassador, reported to King Henry 
 VIIL at the time, " without any substanciall ground or 
 proyf of mattir."{c) In the following month Alexander 
 Makke, convicted of making and selling poison, and of 
 concealing Lady Glammis' treason, was condemned to 
 have his ears cut off and to be banished for life to 
 Aberdeen. (cZ) One w^onders how the Aberdonians liked 
 the compliment. 
 
 During the troublesome reign of Queen Mary her 
 subjects were probably more occupied with politics than 
 with poison, for we find but two cases upon record : 
 Henry and Patrick Congiltoune, for "the cruel Slaughter 
 by Intoxication" of their nephew, in October 1554 ;(e) 
 and Adam Colquhoune, for the murder of a servant and 
 the attempted murder of his mother and stepfather "by 
 that secret method of Poison or Intoxication," in March 
 1562. (y) The wicked uncles escaped, but the other 
 practitioner was hanged and his body burnt to ashes on 
 the Castle Hill. 
 
 Under the Solomonic sway of King James the Sixth, 
 when evil-doers increased and multiplied and, reversing the 
 divine command, did their best to displenish the earth, 
 
 (a) Pitcairn, pp. 187* 191*. (b) Ibid., p. 195*. 
 
 (c) Ibid., p. 198*. (d) Ibid., p. 20.3*. 
 
 (e) Ibid., pp. 368*, 369. (/) Ibid., pp. 419* 420*. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 53 
 
 poisoning shared in the revival of naughtiness. The popular 
 belief in witchcraft, which by precept and example that 
 enlightened monarch did so much to foster, rose to un- 
 paralleled heights, and the Records of Justiciary for the 
 time abound in witch-trials, wherein charges of sorcery and 
 poisoning are inextricably mingled. An examination of 
 these, however entertaining and instructive, would take us 
 too far ; nor does space permit enquiry into the mystery 
 attending the death of the Earl of Atholl, after a feast of 
 " reconciliation " given in April 1579 by his rival the Regent 
 Morton, who was popularly credited with his taking-off. 
 Cases more strictly relevant are that of Helen Cunninghame 
 in January 15 79, (a) for " Ministering of Poysoun to William, 
 hir spous," and of Andro Glencorse in February 1580,(^) for 
 "the poisoning of Issobell Staig, his spous." Both were 
 convicted and duly suffered. In December the same year 
 took place the trial of Laurence, Lord Oliphant, for the 
 slaughter of Alexander Stewart, " schot with ane poysonit 
 bullet." He was acquitted. (c) The only other instance of 
 this peculiar form of crime occurred in June 1609, when the 
 turbulent Border baron, John, Lord Maxwell, treacherously 
 slew with two poisoned bullets Sir James Johnstone of that 
 Ilk, who had superseded him as Warden of the West 
 Marches. (c^) In neither case is any proof of preliminary 
 poisoning recorded ; perhaps it was inferred merely from 
 the symptoms, or from the morbid appearances. 
 
 The year 1590 is memorable for the Great Oyer of 
 Witchcraft — the series of trials following upon the Satur- 
 nalia at North Berwick, as to which King James was so 
 curious — but the case of Katharine, Lady Foulis, in July of 
 that year, must have occasioned more scandal in Scots 
 society. (e) This lady, a daughter of Ross of Balnao-owan 
 and the second wife of Munro of Foulis, was charged with 
 poisoning and witchcraft, the intended victims beino- her 
 brother's wife and her own stepson ; the object, to brino- 
 
 (a) Pitcairn, i. 80. {b) Ibid., p. 84. (c) Ibid., pp. 89, 90. 
 
 (d) Ibid., iii. 28 et seq. (e) Ibid., i. 192-201. 
 
54 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 about a marriage between her brother and her stepdaughter. 
 Fortunately matchmaking mothers seldom carry their 
 scheming to such sinister lengths. We are not here con- 
 cerned with the witchcraft charges, interesting and typical 
 though they are, based upon the dealings of Lady Foulis 
 with certain sorceresses, " lialdin and reput rank commoune 
 Vichis in the countrey." These hags, who varied their 
 necromantic practices by the purveying of poisons, were 
 employed by her ladyship to furnish " ane stoup-full of 
 poysonit new aill " for the destruction of the young laird of 
 Foulis ; but the lady, having tried its efficacy upon a boy, 
 who only " thaireftir tuik seiknes," commissioned the making 
 of "ane pig-full of ranker poysoune," which she sent to her 
 stepson by his "nourrice." The nurse, unluckily for herself, 
 " taistand of the samin, immediatlie thaireftir departit — " 
 upon a farther errand. In connection with the machinations 
 against the Lady Balnagowan, it is noteworthy that one of 
 the charges contains the first recorded mention of that 
 venerable and flowing-bearded excuse for the acquisition of 
 poison — rats. The fallacious use of the word in this relation 
 may have determined its value for modern slang. Lady 
 Foulis was accused of giving eight shillings to a man of the 
 congenial name of McGillieverie-dam " to pas to Elgyne 
 for hying rattoun poysoune" While the minor actors were 
 suitably " convict and brunt," the leading lady was 
 acquitted : her jury was composed of local burgesses and 
 family dependants — a characteristic example of justice as 
 administered under James the Just. 
 
 Very different was the treatment accorded in the 
 following year to another gentlewoman, whose estate the 
 o-ood Kinor coveted for one of his minions. Among the 
 North Berwick "witches" socially the most remarkable 
 was Euphame MacCalzean, daughter of Lord Cliftonhall, 
 one of the Senators of the College of Justice. This lady 
 was in June 1591 sentenced to be taken to the Castle 
 Hill, " and thair bund to ane staik and brunt in assis, 
 quick, to the death," for treasonably conspiring against 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 55 
 
 His Majesty's life by witchcraft ;(a) but the " Dittay " 
 against her contains another interesting charge : " Item, 
 Indytit of airt and pairt of the poysouning of the said 
 Patrik Moscrop, your husband, upon deidlie malice con- 
 tractit aganis him, the fyrst yeir of your mariage, be 
 o-ewing to him of poysoun, and cuist the rest thairof in 
 the closett ; quhairby his face, nek, handis and haill body 
 brak out in reid spottis, quhilk poysoun wes expellit be his 
 youth." Further attempts convinced Patrick that Scotland 
 was no place for him, so he fled beyond " the seais " and 
 spent the remainder of his days abroad. 
 
 In June 1596 the Master of Orkney was tried for con- 
 spiring to murder his brother Patrick, Earl of Orkney, by 
 poison at a banquet in Kirkwall. Though King James 
 personally insisted "in persuit " of the Master, and had 
 the Crown witnesses, in order to confession, tortured with 
 a ferocity which, as Mr. Pitcairn observes, " would disgrace 
 the most barbarous tribe of Indians," the prosecution 
 happily failed, (fe) A similar result attended the trials, in 
 October and November of the same year, of Alison Jollie 
 in Fala, for poisoning a neighbour with whom she had 
 quarrelled over " ane aiker of land,"(c) and of John Boyd, 
 burgess of Edinburgh, for the " slauchter " of a woman by 
 putting poison into the domestic meal-cupboard, on account 
 of "ane deidlie rancour" conceived against her.(cZ) In 
 November 1601 two men of Brechin named Bellie were 
 banished the realm for mixing poison with dough, " and 
 casting doune thairof in Jonet Clerkis zaird in Brechin for 
 destructioune of fowlis, be the quhilk poysoune they dis- 
 troyit to the said Jonet twa hennis."(e) Of a darker hue 
 were the deeds for which in July 1605 William Rose of 
 Dunskeith suff'ered doom.(/) This miscreant with the co- 
 operation of his mistress, Marie Rannaldoche, frankly 
 designed in the record " ane harlot," essayed to murder 
 
 (a) Pitcairn, i. 247-257. (h) Ibid., pp. 373-377. 
 
 (c) Ikid., pp. 397-399. (d) Ibid., p. 399. 
 
 (e) Ibid., ii. 336. (/) Ibid., pp. 481-484. 
 
56 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 his wife with " poysonet and tressonabill drinkis," and 
 failing in his purpose, " unmercifullie strangallit and 
 wirreit" her in her bed. As, in addition to murder under 
 trust, he was convicted of stouthrief or masterful theft, 
 reset, adultery and other crimes, Rose must have been a 
 very pretty villain. 
 
 No distinction appears then to have been drawn be- 
 tween the felonious administration of drugs to destroy 
 life and the giving of them with curative intent. Thus, 
 in November 1597, Christian Saidler in Blakhouse, "a 
 wyise wyffe," who had successfully treated sundry patients 
 by prescriptions obtained " frae ane Italean strangear callit 
 Mr. Johnne Damiet,"(a) thereby effecting cures "quhilk be 
 na naturall meanis of phisik or uther lawfull and Godlie 
 wayes" could, in the judgment of the authorities, have 
 been performed, was upon conviction "wirreit at ane staik' 
 on the Castle Hill. (6) It seems hard that she should have 
 suffered for the Crown lawyers' lack of faith. So too, in 
 the case of Bartie Patersoune, " tasker in Newbottill," 
 indicted in December 1607 for " ministring, under forme 
 of medecine, of poysoneable drinkis," the alleged murder 
 of two patients is charged along with the " cureing of 
 James Broun in Turnydykis of ane unknawin disease," as 
 also the treating of " his awdn bairne " and of one Alexander 
 Clerk, the remedy employed in each case being " watter 
 brocht be him furth of the Loch callit the Dow-Loche, 
 besyde Drumlanrig."(c) Upon this point a further illus- 
 tration of what was legally held to constitute the crime of 
 poisoning is afforded by the case of Issobell Haldane in 
 May 1623, charged with bringing water from the Well of 
 Ruthven, of which she " had gewin drinkis to cure bairneis," 
 one of whom, notwithstanding, died. For these charitable 
 acts she was " brunt " at Perth as a warning to sick-nurses 
 in general, (c/) 
 
 (a) Jehan Daniyte, the French or Italian priest and wizard who warned 
 Rizzio of his danger. (6) Pitcairn, pp. 25-29. 
 
 (r) Ibid., ii. 535, 536. (d) Ibid., pp. 537, 538. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 57 
 
 In November 1609 James Mure of Monyhagen was 
 " dilaitit " for having given to Mai-garet Wicht in 
 Dalraellington " ane Incliantit drink."(a) This person, a 
 kinsman of the celebrated John Mure of Auchindrayne, 
 "maist willinglie " offering himself to trial, " disassenting 
 fra all continuatioun," and alleging that the charge was 
 " bot maliciouslie inventit aganis him be the said Margaret 
 for hir awin previe advantage " — a defence worthy of his 
 redoubtable relative — was discharged owing to the non- 
 appearance of the " Persewar." Perhaps, knowing the 
 family, the lady thought it more prudent not to press 
 the matter: the Mures were ill folk to go to law with. 
 
 Leaving these nebulous and fantastic charges we reach 
 solid criminal ground in the case of the Erskines in 
 December 1613, Robert, Helen, Isobel and Anna, brother 
 and sisters, were branches of the godly tree whereof Mr. 
 John Erskine of Dun had been the stalwart trunk. That 
 inveterate Reformer, surviving till 1591, devoted, we are 
 told, his declining years to the moral and religious welfare 
 of his many descendants. Robert and his sisters were 
 probably then too young to profit by the good man's 
 precepts ; but if they were a fair sample of the stock, he 
 had his work cut out for him. Their brother David, the 
 last laird of Dun, died leaving two children, on whose 
 behalf the property was administered by a tutor, an office 
 to which the uncle Robert thought himself entitled — 
 doubtless a long minority would present opportunity for 
 pickings. But apart from this grievance, his sisters urged 
 upon him the hardship of being kept out of a fair estate 
 by the survivance of their little nephews. Beyond credi- 
 bility as it seems, repeated family counsels were held 
 within their house of Logic as to the best way of expe- 
 diting Robert's succession. The sisters — who might claim 
 kinship with their resolute countrywoman, Lady Macbeth 
 — finding it difficult to screw their less bloodthirsty 
 brother's courage to the sticking-place, approached one 
 
 (a) Pitcairn, iii. 68, 69. 
 
58 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 David Blewhouse with a proposal that if he could contrive 
 " be sum sinisterous meanis " the extinction of the two 
 young lives standing between Robert and the estate, he 
 should receive part of the lands and five hundred merks 
 in silver. Subsequently Robert himself called upon Blew- 
 house to homologate the offer, but that gentleman declined 
 to treat. Thereupon the sisters set out one summer evening 
 from the place of Logic, and passing over Cairn-o'-Mount 
 towards Muir alehouse, took counsel with a wise woman, 
 Janet Irving by name, reputed "ane abuser of the people," 
 From this sibyl they obtained " ane grit quantitie of herbis " 
 which, with instructions for use, they carried home to Logic. 
 Robert, sceptical as to the potency of the herbs, personally 
 interviewed the sorceress, who satisfied him that they were 
 " forceable aneuch " for his purpose. So as directed they 
 were steeped in ale for a long space, and the resultant 
 brew was taken by the family party to Montrose, where 
 the children were then living with their mother. After 
 drinking this beverage both boys were seized with pain 
 and violent vomiting, to which the elder presently suc- 
 cumbed, exclaiming with his ultimate breath, and a grasp 
 of the situation beyond his years : " Wo is me, that I evir 
 had richt of successioun to ony landis or leving ! fi"or gif I 
 had bene borne sum pure coitteris sone, I had nocht bene 
 sa demanet [treated], nor sic wikket practizes had bene 
 plottit aganis me for my landis." Only less immediately 
 fatal was the condition of the younger boy, " ofi" quhais 
 lyfe," says the indictment, " thair is na hoip." This 
 monstrous and sordid crime was fortunately too clumsy 
 to escape detection, so the uncle and aunts were forth- 
 with apprehended. Robert was tried first in December 
 1613, and having avouched the deed, was beheaded at 
 the Mercat Cross of Edinburgh. (a) His sisters, denying 
 their guilt, were in the following June convicted upon his 
 confession and on the direct evidence of BJewhouse and 
 others. Isobel and Anna shared their brother's doom ; 
 
 (a) Pitcairn, iii. 260-264. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 59 
 
 Helen, " being moir penitent, thogh less giltie, than the 
 rest," had her sentence commuted to banishment for life. (a) 
 The whole horrid business forms an instructive comment on 
 the state of Scots society in the golden days of "gentle 
 King Jamie." 
 
 Hitherto we have walked in the light of the admirable 
 Pitcairn, whose research has done so much to make plain 
 the way of the student of early Scottish crime. Sir Walter 
 Scott wrote in the Quarterly Review for February 1831 an 
 article warmly appreciative of "his patient and enduring 
 toil," but these labours, unfortunately for us, were carried 
 no further than the year 1624; and for subsequent cases, 
 other than such as are separately reported, until we reach 
 the first series of the ofiicial Justiciary Reports beginning 
 in 1826, we must rely on those respectively noticed in 
 the treatises of Burnett and Hume, and included in the 
 collections of Maclaurin and Arnot. The Proceedings of 
 the Justiciary Court from 1661 to 1678, published by the 
 Scottish History Society, are so barren in detail as to yield 
 little to the present purpose. The only grain I have been 
 able to glean from them is the case in May 1665 of 
 Margaret Hamilton, relict of Robert Bedford, merchant 
 in Leith, for the murder of her husband, an Englishman, 
 inspired by an intrigue with his friend, a local surveyor. 
 This lady " employed a servant to buy poison," but being, 
 as appears, of an impetuous habit, she anticipated its 
 action "with the canon bullet that she used for breaking 
 of her coalls," accounting afterwards for the deceased's 
 injuries by a pretended fall down stairs. She was very 
 properly beheaded.(?>) 
 
 From the inadequate data furnished by these early cases 
 it is impossible to tell the nature of the toxic substances 
 employed, while the common conjunction of poisoning and 
 sorcery does not tend to enlightenment ; but such indica- 
 tions as there are point to the poisons formerly classed as 
 vegetable. We now come to the first recorded Scottish 
 
 {a) Pitcairn, pp. 2GG-269. (6) Justiciary Records, i. 125, 126. 
 
60 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 case in which the poison used is definitely stated : that of 
 John Dick and Janet Alexander, his spouse, convicted in 
 March 1649 of the murder of his brother and sister by 
 poisoning them with arsenic, administered in a loaf or 
 bannock. (a) It is to be noted that, so curiously con- 
 servative is the criminal mind, this irritant has since 
 continued the standard medium in homicidal poisoning. 
 That it was early and widely recognised as such in other 
 times and countries appears from its adoption by the classic 
 school of Greek and Latin poisoners. Arsenic was the 
 favourite specific of the Borgias, the famed Aqua Tofi"ana 
 consisted of a solution of arsenic, and to arsenic Madame de 
 Brinvilliers owed her dreadful power. Its deadly properties 
 were well known ; it was readily obtainable and as easily 
 administered; and, until in 1836 Marsh discovered his 
 test, there was no certain method for its detection. (6) 
 
 An interesting case, disclosing unusual originality of 
 design, in which death was caused by the excessive adminis- 
 tration of drugs not in their nature poisonous, was tried 
 in January 1676. (c) Two menservants, John Ramsay and 
 George Clerk, were charged with the murder of their 
 master, John Anderson, merchant in Edinburgh, an old 
 bachelor, wealthy and infirm, with none to care for him 
 but his hired attendants, who basely abused their trust by 
 repeatedly robbing him when they had lulled his vigilance 
 with liquor. The season was "very sickly" — dysentery 
 raged in the town ; there were many deaths, and the 
 stricken were ignorantly shunned for fear of infection. To 
 these wicked servants the idea . occurred of counterfeiting 
 by medicine the symptoms of the disease in their master. 
 For this purpose they consulted in the King's Park a lad 
 named Kennedy, an apothecary's apprentice, whom they 
 induced to supply them with certain purgatives, which 
 
 (a) Burnett's Criminal Laiv, p. 9 ; Hume's Covivientaries, 1819, i. 284. 
 (6) Those curious in the poisons of the ancients may consult Edinburgh 
 Medical Journal, xxxiii. 315. 
 
 (c) Arnot's Criminal Trials, 1785, pp. 142-145 ; Burnett, p. 9 ; Hume, i. 285. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 61 
 
 speedily produced the desired result. The old man called 
 in his own physician, who treated him for the common 
 disorder. From Kennedy they also obtained syrup of 
 poppy, which they mixed with their master's drink, and 
 when he was unconscious, rifled his repositories of money 
 and jewels. They next gave him "powder of jalap and 
 crystal of tartar" to counteract the effects of his doctor's 
 prescriptions. But whether by the efficacy of these, or by 
 the strength of his constitution, the old gentleman beo^an 
 to mend ; so the murderers sought from Kennedy a more 
 potent drug. This the apprentice refused to give them, 
 "saying that the body would swell, and they would be 
 discovered " ; but he advised an increased exhibition of 
 jalap, which they accordingly mixed in a conserve of roses 
 prepared by the patient's own apothecary. So soon as 
 they perceived that the end was near they secured the 
 residue of his valuables, and " called in the neighbours to 
 see him die." Eamsay and Clerk were convicted and, con- 
 fessing their guilt, were hanged at the Cross ; Kennedy, 
 who had furnished the drugs and shared the spoils, was 
 in the following February indicted as art and part in the 
 crime. It was ingeniously objected for him to the rele- 
 vancy of the charge that the Act 1450 on which he was 
 tried applied only to poisonous drugs, not to such as were 
 given medicinally and were not intrinsically noxious. The 
 point was never judicially determined, for before judgment 
 Kennedy was upon his own petition banished for life ; but 
 Sir George Mackenzie in discussing the question observes : 
 " The best of Druggs, given in great excess, is Poyson ; for 
 Poyson consists in excess of quantity as well as quality, and 
 whatever overpowers our nature is poysonable to us. "(a) 
 The only similar case I have encountered is that of William 
 Paterson, tried in February 1815 for the murder of his wife 
 by repeated doses of sulphur, calomel, tartar emetic, jalap, 
 castor-oil and other purgatives. At the trial, a surgeon 
 
 («) Laws and Customs of Scotlniid in. Matters Criminal, tit. viii. 
 
62 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 swore that he was asked by the husband for such drugs to 
 dispatch the wife, and when these were refused with the 
 remark that this was tantamount to murder, Paterson 
 replied, "No; it was only helping her awa " ! He was 
 acquitted by a majority of one ; but his neighbours, taking 
 a diflferent view of the facts, well-nigh lynched him on his 
 return home. (a) 
 
 The attempt and not the deed, which confounded Lady 
 Macbeth, also caused some confusion in practice as regards 
 its proper penalty. Thus in the case of David Hay and 
 Dr. Thomson, March 1692, in which an attempt to poison 
 with laudanum was charged along with the actual murder 
 of Hay's wife, the doctor who had supplied the drug was 
 convicted of art and part. Both were sentenced to be 
 hanged, and to have their heads cut off and affixed to the 
 jail of Lanark. (6) In the case of Dr. Elliot and others in 
 January 1694, where the charge was "the designing to use, 
 and the use-making and buying of poyson," coupled with 
 a malignant conspiracy to fix the like crime on two innocent 
 persons, the accused were sentenced to death. (c) When, 
 on the other hand, in January 1728, Walter Buchanan of 
 Balquhan was charged with two attempts to destroy Jean 
 Dougal, Lady Branshogel, liferentrix of part of his estate, 
 by giving poison to an unwitting third party to administer 
 to her, the Court found the libel relevant to infer only an 
 arbitrary punishment. (cZ) The same course was followed 
 on the trial of Janet Ronald in May 1763, for an attempt 
 to poison her sister by mixing with her food verdigris, of 
 which by the timely use of antidotes she recovered. (e) 
 Since the Act 10 George IV. c. 38, however, the attempted 
 administration of poison with intent to injure or destroy 
 life is a capital offence. 
 
 (a) Hume, i. 285 ; ii. 318. 
 
 (6) Burnett, pp. 8, 10 ; Hume, i. 175, 269. 
 
 (c) Burnett, p. 10 ; Hume, i. 167, 175. 
 
 (d) Burnett, p. 10 ; Hume, i. 176. 
 
 (e) Maclaurin's Criminal Cases, pp. 211-249 ; Burnett, pp. 9, 10 ; Hume, 
 ii. 399. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 63 
 
 The case of Dr. Elliot above cited calls, on account 
 of its unusual features, for more than passing mention. 
 Daniel Nicolson, an Edinburgh writer, had a mistress 
 named Marion Maxwell, and with the view of regularising 
 their connection, he proposed to rid himself of his lawful 
 spouse. For this purpose the pair "seduced" Dr. John 
 Elliot to furnish them with the necessary drugs, which were 
 supplied accordingly by that venal physician. Some diffi- 
 culty was experienced in administering these, so the parties 
 formed an elaborate and complicated plot for the judicial 
 destruction of Mrs. Nicolson and her sister, Margaret 
 Sands, by fixing on them a design to poison her husband. 
 In pursuance of this scheme Nicolson waited upon the 
 Lord Advocate, Sir James Stewart, to complain that his 
 life was in danger from his wife and sister-in-law, who he 
 said had conceived a groundless suspicion of his infidelity 
 with Maxwell ; that they had applied for poison to Dr. 
 Elliot, who, being filled with horror at such a proposal, 
 informed the intended victim ; and asking his lordship's 
 guidance in this painful predicament. Summoned before the 
 Lord Advocate, the doctor confirmed the tale, adding that 
 so anxious were the ladies to obtain poison, they would not 
 hesitate to give a receipt for it in any terms he might 
 suggest. His lordship authorised Elliot to supply what 
 was wanted and to take a receipt therefor, intending to 
 secure the poison when in Mrs. Nicolson's possession. The 
 conspirators then placed poison in her repositories, where 
 it was duly "discovered" by the Crown ofiicials. Dr. 
 Elliot next produced a receipt in the required form, bearing 
 to be granted by the wife and her sister, who were forth- 
 with apprehended. But public opinion was less blind than 
 Justice ; when the story got abroad the known character 
 and conduct of Nicolson and Maxwell and the professional 
 repute of their medical adviser, raised suspicions which in 
 the end led to the unmasking of the plotters. The doctor, 
 under re-examination, collapsed and confessed ; and the 
 three malefactors were brought to the bar, charged with 
 
64 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 forgery, conspiracy, and attempt to poison. The legal 
 objection to Mrs. Nicolson giving evidence against her own 
 husband was ingeniously surmounted by taking her testimony 
 on oath before the Lord Advocate, the Sheriff, and the 
 Clerk of the Privy Council, and producing her deposition 
 at the trial ! His lordship's handling of this case goes 
 some way to explain his popular nickname, "Wily Jamie." 
 All three prisoners were convicted and suffered the extreme 
 penalty. 
 
 Resuming our chronological survey we find arsenic 
 playing the leading part in a series of cases the first of 
 which, that of William Bisset and Jean Currier, is of June 
 1705. (a) Jean, Bisset's mistress, bought from an apothecary 
 in Dundee "an ounce of arsenic unprepared," on pretence 
 of killing a dog, and gave it to Bisset, who administered 
 it to his wife by the hand of their maidservant, as a 
 medicine which her doctor had prescribed. The verdict 
 " finds that the powder found in the defunct's stomach, Mary 
 Murray, was the occasion of her death." Although Currier 
 was accessory to, and was indeed the instigator of the 
 crime, and both were convicted, their sentence was merely 
 whipping, the pillory, and banishment. 
 
 An interesting departure from the standardized methods 
 of crime occurs in November 1720 in the case of Nicol 
 Muschet, a villain whose name is familiar to readers of 
 The Heart of MidlotUan.(b) Before slaying his wife in 
 the King's Park, as commemorated by his cairn, Muschet 
 and his associates made repeated attempts to destroy her 
 by poisoning and other more violent means, from which 
 her amazing immunity might, but for the sequel, lead 
 one to think the lady bore a charmed life. Burnbank, 
 Muschet's infamous friend and adviser, recommended 
 corrosive sublimate as "far less dangerous to meddle 
 with than arsenic, on account arsenic both swelled and 
 
 (a) Burnett, pp. 9, 268 ; Hume, i. 270, 276 ; ii. 370. 
 
 (6) Criminal Triah Illustrative of the Tale entitled " The Heart of Mid-Lothian," 
 1818, pp. 323-344 ; Maclaurin's Criminal Cases, pp. 738-741. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 65 
 
 discoloured," and quantities of that poison were from time 
 to time administered to the unhappy woman in the sugar 
 she was in the habit of taking with her " dram." As she 
 recovered from the illness thus induced, it was decided to 
 increase the doses, so the conspirators put the poison into 
 a nutmeg-grater, from which they conveyed it into her 
 brandy and ale. But though afterwards the grater looked 
 " as if it had been burnt in the fire, by reason of the 
 corrosive mercury," the patient still survived, and physical 
 force had finally to be employed to terminate her miserable 
 existence. Muschet was sentenced to be hanged and his 
 body hung in chains to the terror and example of others, 
 a penalty reserved for crimes of singular wickedness. 
 
 In the case of Nicolas Cockburn in August 17 54, (a) 
 a wife was chargred with the murder of her husband and 
 stepmother by putting arsenic respectively into their kail 
 (broth) and porridge, to disappoint a beneficial settlement 
 in favour of the mother as a widow. In the husband's 
 case there was no sufficient proof; but on a post-mortem 
 examination of the mother, the surgeons detected in the 
 stomach " a whitish powder resembling arsenic," some of 
 which was also discovered in the bottom of a vessel used 
 by the deceased for food. A paper containing a similar 
 powder, ascertained on analysis to be arsenic, was found in 
 the prisoner's chest. Dundas of Arniston, the future Lord 
 President, who as Justice of the Peace had taken the 
 woman's dying declaration, deponed to her grounds of 
 belief that her stepdaughter had poisoned her. The 
 verdict was Guilty. In Andrew Wilson's case in August 
 1755 a man bought arsenic " for rats."(6) He was seen to 
 put something from a paper into a mug of ale, out of which 
 his wife drank and shortly thereafter died with the usual 
 symptoms of poisoning. She expressed strong suspicion 
 against her husband. A white powder, which was neither 
 analysed nor preserved, was noticed in the mug and tasted 
 by a witness, who presently suffered from vomiting, etc. 
 
 (a) Burnett, pp. 9, 544 ; Hume, ii. 392. (b) Burnett, pp. 9, 545. 
 
 5 
 
66 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 No medical man attended the deceased, nor was the body 
 opened, and no arsenic was found in possession of the 
 prisoner, who absconded. He was brought back, and 
 convicted on trial. The motive alleged for the crime was 
 the marrying of a younger woman. Like Muschet, Wilson 
 was condemned to be hung in chains. In two Inverness 
 cases, M'Coiler in September 1757, (a) and M'Kenzie in 
 1760,(6) where the poisons employed were respectively 
 laudanum and arsenic, the accused were acquitted. 
 
 The curious laxity which then obtained in regard to 
 medical evidence as to the cause of death, and the exist- 
 ence of any poison in the body of the deceased, is nowhere 
 perhaps more strikingly apparent than in the remarkable 
 case of Katharine Nairn in August 1765.{c). I have often 
 wondered why no enterprising novelist has laid hands upon 
 her story, such is the effective quality of the facts, so nice 
 the question of a just apportionment of the relative guilt 
 and innocence. " Readers of Mr. J. A. Symond's book on 
 the Eenaissance," wrote Andrew Lang once, " hold up 
 obtesting hands at the rich and varied iniquities of the 
 Courts of mediaeval Italy. But for complex and variegated 
 depravity the family of Mr. Ogilvy of Eastmiln could give 
 the Baglioni and other Italian miscreants a stroke a hole — 
 whatever view you take of the case." Katharine, daughter 
 of Sir Thomas Nairn of Dunsinnan, married at nineteen, 
 on 30th January 1765, Thomas Ogilvy, laird of Eastmiln 
 of Glenisla, in Angus, a gentleman in failing health and 
 more than double her age. There lived with them his 
 venerable mother and younger brother, Patrick, a lieutenant 
 invalided home from the East Indies. Alexander, the 
 youngest of the three brothers, was a dissipated surgeon 
 in Edinburgh, on bad terms with his family. A month 
 after the wedding there arrived from that city Miss Anne 
 Clark, a cousin of the Ogilvys, who was, though unknown 
 
 (a) Burnett, p. 10. (h) Ibid. 
 
 (c) Trial of Katharine Nairn and Patrick Ogilvie for the Crimes of Incest and 
 Murder, Edinburgh, 1765 ; Twelve Scots Trials, 1913, pp. 106-135. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 67 
 
 to her relatives at Eastmiln, a woman of flagitious life, 
 of evil disposition, and Alexander's mistress. He sent her 
 ostensibly to make his peace, but really to work what 
 mischief she could; failing his delicate brethren he was 
 next heir to the property. The first-fruits of her mission 
 were divers rumours regarding the relations of the bride 
 with the young lieutenant, but neither the husband nor 
 the mother paid much heed to their guest's scandalous 
 whispers. The two brothers, however, quarrelled over 
 money matters; the laird referred to Anne's reports, and 
 Patrick, indignantly denying their truth, left the house, 
 refusing to return though pressed by Thomas to do so. 
 Katharine, whose health was then indifl'erent — she was in 
 prospect of becoming a mother — asked Patrick to send her 
 some salts and laudanum which he had in his sea-chest at 
 Alyth ; and having got the drugs he sent them to Eastmiln 
 by Andrew Stewart, his sister's husband, who delivered 
 them to Katharine. Anne then informed the other members 
 of the family that Katharine had told her she meant to 
 poison her husband, and she (Anne), to put her oft^, had 
 herself promised to procure poison from Edinburgh, but 
 that Patrick had now supplied it. None of them believed 
 her " horrible tale," and no action was taken. Next day, 
 6th June, the laird, whose ailments had been increasing, 
 became seriously ill, with symptoms of acute gastric in- 
 flammation, and a doctor was summoned but arrived too 
 late ; Thomas Ogilvy was dead. Five days later, on that 
 fixed for the funeral, Alexander came post from Edinburgh, 
 sensationally stopped the burial on the ground that his 
 brother had been poisoned, lodged with the authorities 
 an information upon which Katharine and Patrick were 
 apprehended, and assisted by Miss Clark — who after the 
 death had been dismissed by Katharine — entered into pos- 
 session of the estate. On their trial at Edinburgh on 
 5th Auojust for the crimes of incest and murder, the evidence 
 relating to. the two charges was, wilfully or not, confused: 
 the intrigue, as appears, being inferred from the poisoning. 
 
68 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 and the poisoning assumed from the intrigue. The proof 
 occupied forty-three consecutive hours, but of upwards of 
 a hundred witnesses for the defence only ten were examined, 
 owino- to the undisguised impatience of the jury. To 
 establish the first charge, the prosecutor relied mainly on 
 the infragrant testimony of Miss Clark — than whom in 
 such a connection no witness could have been more com- 
 petent — and on that of a servant girl who had been dis- 
 missed by Katharine for theft and had sworn revenge. As 
 ref^ards the second charge, strangely enough, it was neither 
 proved that the deceased died of poison, nor that his wife 
 had the means of poisoning him were she " so dispoged." 
 The medical evidence as to the cause of death was quite 
 inconclusive — though three surgeons inspected the body, 
 a post-mortem had been prevented by Alexander — but the 
 awkward fact that Patrick, shortly before the death, did buy 
 half an ounce of arsenic, " in order to destroy some dogs 
 that spoiled the game," was clearly proved. The prisoners 
 havino- been found guilty on both counts, Katharine, in 
 the picturesque language of the time, " pled her belly " in 
 arrest of judgment, and sentence was in her case delayed. 
 The conduct and result of the trial was widely and adversely 
 criticised, and efforts were made to have the verdict reviewed 
 by the House of Lords, but this was found to be incom- 
 petent. After four several respites Patrick, protesting his 
 innocence, was hanged in the Grassmarket. Meanwhile 
 Katharine in the Tolbooth had given birth to a daughter, 
 who did not long survive. The night before she was to 
 appear for judgment, having changed clothes with the 
 midwife, she escaped from the prison. Her uncle, William 
 Nairn, an Edinburgh advocate, later raised to the Bench as 
 Lord Dunsinnan, doubtless knew something of his niece's 
 fiio-ht from justice, for his clerk accompanied her in a post- 
 chaise to England, whence she safely reached the Continent. 
 She is said to have entered a French convent, dying in the 
 end full of years and grace. Alexander did not long enjoy 
 his t^ood fortune ; presently he was banished for bigamy, 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 69 
 
 but being allowed some time to settle his affairs, met a 
 violent death by a fall from a window. Anne Clark, how- 
 ever, survived, retaining in her experienced bosom the 
 secrets of the house of Eastmiln. 
 
 Not every jury was so eager to convict as that which 
 sent Patrick Ogilvy to the gallows. On the trial at 
 Glasgow of Jean Semple in May 1773 for poisoning her 
 husband with arsenic, no less than fifteen grains of that 
 substance were found in the deceased's stomach.(«) "The 
 usual experiments," we read, " were made on it by hot iron, 
 and part of it was given to a chicken, which died soon 
 after." But this failed to convince the jury, who returned 
 a verdict of Not Proven. Even more curious was the 
 scepticism shown by an Aberdeen jury on the trial of Ann 
 Inglis in 1795.(6) In the homely household of a young 
 farmer, named Patrick Pirie, this woman combined the 
 offices of cook and concubine, but her master, desirous of 
 ranging himself, announced his intention to marry another. 
 This was deeply resented by his lady -help, who was heard 
 to make the ominous remark that " there would be a burial 
 before a bridal." Shortly before the wedding, Pirie, a hale 
 man of thirty-two, who had never had a day's illness, after 
 taking a draught of ale from the hands of Ann, was seized 
 with violent vomiting and internal pain ; he was attended 
 by a doctor, but died in nine days, declaring his belief that 
 his servant-mistress had poisoned him. A post-mortem 
 disclosed " much inflammation in the stomach, the inner 
 coat of which was corroded and separated from the adjoin- 
 ing one." No poison was detected in the body, but the 
 surgeons deponed that the appearances were such as might 
 have been produced by sulphate of copper or blue vitriol. 
 A search of Ann's chest brought to light a parcel of that 
 poison, which she said she had bought as a cure for tooth- 
 ache, though she was never known to suffer from that 
 ailment. The verdict of Not Guilty must have surprised 
 
 (a) Bunieit, p. 584. 
 
 {b) Ibid., pp. 9, 393, 547 ; Black Kalendar of Aberdeen, 1854, pp. 139, 140. 
 
70 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 hor as much as it did the prosecutor. Strangely enough, 
 another instance of the use of similar means occurred at 
 Aberdeen in 1830, (a) jealousy being also the motive of the 
 crime, where Catherine Humphrey, having quarrelled with 
 her husband about another woman, poured oil of vitriol 
 into his open mouth as he lay asleep. She was convicted 
 and hanged. This, too, was the poison employed by 
 Barbara Malcolm to destroy her own child, for which she 
 was condemned in January 1808.(6) 
 
 Such toxicological vagaries are rare ; arsenic resumes 
 its rightful place in the case of Matthew Hay, convicted at 
 Ayr in September 1780(c) of poisoning and attempting 
 to poison a whole family. Hay had seduced one of the 
 daughters, and to prevent discovery he did not hesitate to 
 sacrifice, not only the girl herself, but her father, mother 
 and sisters — five lives in all. The parents, however, alone 
 succumbed ; the others, after severe sufferings, recovered. 
 Hay, having bought arsenic " for killing rats," called one 
 day on his victim and found her boiling sowens for the 
 domestic meal. He sent her out to get him a drink, and 
 during her absence threw some of the arsenic into the pot 
 and the rest into the seed barrel. All who ate of the food 
 were seized with the usual symptoms of arsenical poisoning, 
 and the father and mother died that night. On a post- 
 mortem examination of the bodies no arsenic was found, 
 but Dr. Black, the eminent chemist, discovered that sub- 
 stance mixed with the sowens and seed ; so Hay was, 
 happily, hanged. It is interesting to note that it was upon 
 this trial that Lord Katnes made from the bench the 
 judicial joke about "'check-mate," which Lockhart in his 
 Life of Scott fathered upon Lord Braxfield ; also that the 
 counsel for the defence, not the prisoner himself, was his 
 lordship's old opponent at chess. (cZ) 
 
 (a) Black KaUndar of Aberdeen, pp. 207-209 ; Edinburgh Medical Journal, 
 XXXV. 298-316. (b) Burnett, pp. 9, 549. 
 
 (c) Ibid., pp. 9, 11, 546 ; Hume, i. 284 ; ii. 69. 
 
 (d) Hill Burton's Narratives from Criminal Trials in Scotland, ii. 64, 65, n. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 71 
 
 In the case of Marshall, on the Autumn Circuit at Perth 
 in 1796, the accused's wife died without suspicion of foul 
 play, which did not arise until two months thereafter, when 
 the body was exhumed and three grains of arsenic were 
 found in the stomach. The prisoner was convicted. (a) iV.t 
 Aberdeen, in 1797, a man named Stewart was found guilty 
 of an attempt to poison by administering arsenic in a ball 
 of oatmeal. (6) In 1800, at Glasgow, one Lockhart and his 
 servant-maid were charged with the murder of Lockhart's 
 wife.(c) No medical man attended the deceased and there 
 was no evidence of the cause of death. It was proved 
 that the husband had bought upon false pretences a large 
 quantity of laudanum, but the body was not opened until 
 a fortnight after death, when the physicians were of opinion 
 that even had laudanum been administered, it could not 
 have been discovered. The accused were acquitted. At 
 Ayr, in April 1810, John M'Millan, from Wigtownshire, 
 was convicted of poisoning with corrosive sublimate Barbara 
 M'Kinnel, a girl who was with child to him.(d) 
 
 As we advance into the nineteenth century the field of 
 our investigation, whether by the greater prevalence of 
 poisoning or by the improved methods available for its 
 detection, so largely widens that in the space at my disposal 
 I am able to deal only with the more interesting examples. 
 The crime for which, at Aberdeen, in October 1821, George 
 Thom was brought to book, presents, both as regards manner 
 of perpetration and comprehensiveness of scope, points of 
 resemblance to that of Matthew Hay previously cited. (e) 
 A well-to-do-farmer, who for sixty-one years had enjoyed 
 a high reputation for piety and worth, Thom married his 
 second wife Jean Mitchell, whose brothers and sisters lived 
 at Burnside, a farm in the parish of Keig. By the death 
 of a relation the Mitchells succeeded to a considerable 
 fortune, but the fifth share falling to Mrs. Thom seemed to 
 
 (a) Burnett, pp. 9, 548. (6) Ibid., pp. 9, 11, 584. 
 
 (c) Ibid., pp. y, 549. ((/) Ibid., p. 10. 
 
 (e) Black Kalendar of Aberdeen, pp. 173-180 ; Edinburgh Medical Journal, 
 xviii. 167. 
 
72 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 her spouse a very inadequate provision, and it was obvious 
 that the death of the other legatees would substantially 
 increase their sister's portion. With a view, therefore, to 
 accelerate her succession he called at Burnside on the eve of 
 the local " Sacramental Sunday," and announced his inten- 
 tion to stay the night. After a friendly supper the visitor 
 asked leave to sleep in the kitchen, but this his host would 
 not permit, and he was installed in the best bedroom. In 
 the small hours of the Sunday morning one of the brothers, 
 from his box-bed in the kitchen, heard somebody moving 
 about the cupboard, but did not trouble to open the shutter 
 of his insalutary cubicle to see who was astir so early. 
 When the family met for breakfast, Thom, hospitably pressed 
 to share the meal, declined on the plea that he must be oif 
 before folks were going to the kirk : it would never do for 
 one of his godly walk and conversation to be seen abroad 
 upon the Sabbath day. So, wishing his relatives a kind fare- 
 well, the worthy man set forth. On his way home he ate 
 at Mains of Cluny a hearty breakfast, though he said he had 
 been very bad at Burnside after something he had eaten 
 there, and that but for his promptitude in inducing sickness 
 with a crow's feather, he would not have lived to tell the 
 tale. Breakfast at Burnside was a simple meal, consisting 
 of porridge, eaten, in the good Scots fashion, with salt 
 instead of sugar. That morning one of the brothers thought 
 it had "sweet, sickening taste," the others noticed nothing 
 amiss. Presently all of them became unwell ; the sisters 
 stayed at home, but the brothers struggled to church. 
 James had to go out during the service, as he " felt himself 
 turning blind " ; he found William in the kirkyard, very 
 sick. All four were for some time seriously ill but three 
 recovered, William alone dying within the week. They 
 were attended by a doctor, who seems at first to have had 
 no suspicions. It appears that from a queer sort of family 
 pride the survivors wished to hush up the incident ; a post- 
 mortem examination, however, was made, and three surgeons 
 " concurred in opinion that the deceased had died by means 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND " 73 
 
 of some deleterious substance taken into the stomach." 
 From the beginning the Mitchells had suspected their 
 brother-in-law, and when Thorn, uninvited, came with cynical 
 audacity to the funeral, his presence was forbidden — he 
 "had done ill enough there already." Told that William 
 had been poisoned, he made the rather inept suggestion 
 that " poison might have been got in the burn from 
 puddocks," to which Helen Mitchell dryly replied that 
 there were no puddocks in the porridge, whereupon Thom 
 took his departure. He was later arrested, tried for murder, 
 found guilty, and sentenced to death. No arsenic was 
 traced to his possession, but an attempt to buy it "to 
 poison rats" was proved by an Aberdeen apothecary. After 
 conviction, Thom earnestly maintained his innocence, but 
 despite edifying behaviour in prison he attempted to get 
 his son to supply him with poison. Finally, the game 
 being up, he confessed that he had mixed arsenic with the 
 salt, not with the meal as had been assumed at the trial, (a) 
 When the execution was over, " the body was subjected 
 to a series of galvanic experiments of which a particular 
 account was afterwards published " — a shocking business 
 in more senses than one. 
 
 At Glasgow, in April 1822, Helen Rennie, a domestic 
 servant, was charged with the murder of her illegitimate 
 child.(6) The mother being in service, the little boy was 
 boarded with another woman. One day Rennie called for 
 him and took him away for some hours ; he was then in 
 perfect health, but when brought back seemed very ill. 
 She explained that she had given him " some brimstone 
 for the hives." The foster-mother sent for a doctor, who 
 found the child dying. A post-mortem was held, when 
 "two teaspoonfulls " of king's yellow (sulphuret of arsenic) 
 were discovered in the stomach. There w^as no indication 
 that the child had suffered from hives. Rennie declared 
 
 (a) Such also was the device of the gatekeeper Mi^arrl, in F.n Bete Humaine 
 )f Zola. 
 
 (6) Edinburgh Evening I'ouranf, 25th April 1822. 
 
74 LOCUSTA TN SCOTLAND 
 
 that she had bought a half-pennyworth of sulphur, and at 
 her trial a druggist's apprentice (who recalls the assistant 
 of the chemist juryman in Bardell v. Pickwick) deponed 
 that the sulphur and king's yellow were kept respectively 
 in a drawer and in a bottle ; he did not recollect having 
 served the prisoner, but was sure he never sold to anyone 
 a half-pennyworth of king's yellow. For the defence, two 
 doctors stated that by an unskilled eye king's yellow might 
 be mistaken for sulphur. The verdict was, by a majority, 
 Not Guilty, the judge, in discharging the prisoner, remarking 
 that he would have voted with the minority. 
 
 The criminal records of 1827 are notable for the occur- 
 rence of several important poisoning cases, of which the 
 first is that of Mary Elder or Smith in February of that 
 year, (a) She was the wife of a respectable farmer at 
 West Denside, near Dundee. Among the women employed 
 at the farm was a girl named Margaret Warden, who had 
 engaged the affections of Mrs. Smith's youngest son, a 
 fact which, when discovered by the mother, in view of a 
 previous lapse on the girl's part, that lady bitterly resented. 
 She dismissed Margaret with ignominy ; but fearing she 
 was enceinte, afterwards induced her to return for the 
 avowed purpose of attempting by illegal means to avert 
 the threatened scandal. Accordingly, with the girl's con- 
 sent, Mrs. Smith gave her sundry doses, particularly, in 
 presence of Jean Norrie, a fellow-servant, " something in 
 a dram glass" that looked like cream of tartar, with the 
 result that Margaret grew gravely ill, her symptoms being 
 those of arsenical poisoning. A doctor, brought by the 
 girl's mother who had learned of her state, thought she 
 was dying of cholera, which was then rife in the district. 
 Margaret, however, expressed both to her mother and to 
 Norrie suspicion of foul play on the part of her mistress. 
 " Ye ken wha is the occasion o' me lyin' here ? " were her 
 
 (a) Sytne's Justiciary Reports, p. 71 ; Account of the Medical Evidence in the 
 Case of Mrs. Smith. By R. Christison, M.D., Edinburgh Medical Journal, 
 xxvii. 141 ; xxviii. 84, 94 ; Twelve Scots Trials, pp. 160-190. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 75 
 
 last words; "but they'll get their reward. My mistress 
 oave me . . . " but death cut short the sentence. So far 
 as human retribution was concerned Margaret, as we shall 
 see, was not inspired. The girl died and was buried ; but 
 somebody talked, so the body was exhumed and examined 
 by three surgeons ; on a subsequent analysis the presence 
 of oxide of arsenic was unequivocally detected, and Mrs. 
 Smith was apprehended on the charge of murder. In her 
 declaration before the Sheriff she denied having known of 
 the dead girl's condition, and said she had given her nothing 
 except a dose of castor-oil, and that she (declarant) got no 
 drugs from any person on the Friday preceding the death. 
 All these statements were at the trial proved to be false. 
 In particular. Dr. Dick of Dundee stated that the prisoner, 
 whom he had known for many years, did on the day in 
 question apply to him for " poison for rats" ; he gave her 
 an ounce and a half of arsenic in a packet marked 
 "Arsenic — Poison," warning her at the same time to be 
 very careful how she used it. Jeffrey and Cockburn 
 conducted the defence, which rested on two disparate 
 bases — cholera and suicide. The opinion of the Crown 
 experts, including that of Dr. Christison who had made 
 an independent analysis, that the death was due to arsenic, 
 remained unshaken ; and Dr. Mackintosh, physician in 
 Edinburgh, called to maintain the theory of death from 
 natural causes, was utterly routed by the Lord Advocate 
 on cross-examination. It would seem that to the evidence 
 of this skilled witness the following amusing extract from 
 Dr. Ohristison's autobiography refers : 
 
 In a trial for poisoning with arsenic— the last occasion on which an 
 attempt was made to dispute the validity of the cheraical evidence in 
 arsenical poisoning— Dr. . . . was employed to make a muddle of the 
 professional testimony ; and this was how he set about it. The proof, 
 from symptoms during life and morbid appearances after death — apart 
 from irrefragable chemical proof of the presence of arsenic in the stomach 
 —was unusually strong, perhaps singly conclusive. But Dr. . . . had no 
 difficulties. "He had great experience of disease. Vast experience in 
 pathological dissections. There was nothing in the symptoms of the 
 
76 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 deceased during her life which he had not seen again and again arising 
 from natural disease : nothing in the appearances in the dead body which 
 he had not seen twenty times as arising from natural causes." "But, 
 Dr. . . . ," said the Lord Advocate, "the symptoms you have heard 
 detailed, and which you say may have arisen from natural disease, are 
 also such as arsenic may produce, are they not?" "They may be all 
 produced by natural disease." "So you have already told us. But 
 may they not also be produced by arsenic?" "They may; but natural 
 disease may equally cause them." "You need not repeat that informa- 
 tion. Doctor. Give me a simple answer to my simple question : May 
 these symptoms be produced by arsenic"? Yea or Nay?" "Yes." 
 " Now, Dr. . . . , you have also told us that the appearances found 
 after death were such as natural disease may produce. Are they not 
 also such as may be produced by arsenic?" "Natural causes may 
 account for them all," etc. etc., through the same round of fencing, until 
 he was compelled to admit that arsenic might produce them. " Now, 
 Doctor," continued the Lord Advocate, "you have heard the evidence 
 of arsenic having been found in the stomach of the woman. Are you 
 satisfied that arsenic was discovered there?" " My Lord, I am no judge 
 of chemical evidence." " Then, Dr. . . . , in that case I must tell you 
 that it will be my duty to represent to the jury and judges that arsenic 
 was unequivocally detected ; and I ask you this— Suppose arsenic was 
 detected, what in that case do you think was the cause of these symptoms, 
 and of these signs in the dead body ? " " Natural disease might cause 
 them all." " Yes ! Yes ! we all know that. But suppose that arsenic 
 was found in the stomach, what then would be your opinion as to their 
 cause?" A pause on the part of the Doctor, now run to earth. "Do 
 you not think, sir, that in that case arsenic was the cause?" Softly and 
 reluctantly came the inevitable answer, "Yes." "One more question, 
 then, and I have done : In your opinion, did this person die of poisoning 
 with arsenic ? " " Yes." " Have you any doubt of it ? " " No." " Then " 
 {sotto voce, yet audibly enough), "what the devil brought you here? "(a) 
 
 This instructive passage is in the official report reduced 
 to a couple of lines. 
 
 There was thus no contesting the fact that the girl died 
 of arsenic, and an attempt to show that she had committed 
 suicide broke down ; nor was Jeffrey more successful in 
 seeking to have the prisoner's declaration set aside on the 
 ground that at the time of making it she was unfit to be 
 examined. Yet, after a trial lasting twenty-two hours, 
 
 (a) Life of Sir Robert Christison, i. 286-288. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 77 
 
 the iury returned a unanimous verdict of Not Proven, 
 and the prisoner was discharged. Cockburn admits his 
 client's guilt. (a) It seems that she had at first meant 
 only to procure abortion, but — -facilis descensus — was led 
 on to employ the more radical remedy of murder. Sir 
 Walter Scott has recorded his impressions of the trial, 
 which he attended. (6) 
 
 A case of peculiar atrocity, exceeding in cold-blooded 
 wickedness even that which we have just considered, was 
 tried at Perth in April of the same year.(c) Two sisters, 
 Margaret and Jean Wishart, kept house together in the 
 High Street of Arbroath, supporting themselves by taking 
 boarders. The younger, Jean, was totally blind and quite 
 dependent on her sister. A young man named Andrew 
 Roy, a Wright or carpenter, had lodged with them for five 
 years. He was, as appears, originally the blind girl's lover, 
 and she had borne him a child, which died ; afterwards 
 Margaret secured his aff"ections, but later he returned to 
 his first love — which indicates in the words of the Lord 
 Justice-Clerk at the trial, " the most abominable footing on 
 which they were." The discovery by Margaret that Jean 
 was about to become again a mother aroused in her, to 
 quote the same authority, a " fiend-like jealousy," and she 
 determined at all costs to remove her rival. On Tuesday, 
 3rd October 1826, Margaret gave Jean, who was then in 
 bed expecting shortly to be confined, her supper of porridge, 
 in presence of a neighbour and one of the boarders. No 
 one but Jean ate of it. Twenty minutes after taking it 
 she was seized with sickness and other painful symptoms. 
 Next day she continued very ill, and on Friday gave birth 
 to a child, when Margaret was reluctantly forced to summon 
 a midwife. Jean begged her sister to send for a doctor, a 
 course also repeatedly urged upon her by divers sympathetic 
 matrons, but Margaret replied "that everything had been 
 
 (o) Circuit Journeys, p. 12. (6) Journal, i. 356, 361. 
 
 (c) Synie's Justiciary Reports, Appendix No. I. ; Edinburgh Medical Journal, 
 xxix. 18. 
 
78 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 done that could be done ; that a doctor would do no good, 
 and that she was not able to pay one." The gruel which, 
 durino- the illness, was given both to mother and child, was 
 prepared by her alone, and she showed throughout complete 
 apathy and indifference as to their sufferings. Jean died 
 on Sunday morning, and as it was obvious that the child 
 too was dying, with similar symptoms, one of the neighbours 
 '• brought in a doctor from the street." He said he could 
 do nothing, and being asked by Margaret — an excellent 
 ruse — to look at the dead body of her sister, refused, " as it 
 could do no good." He seems to have had no more con- 
 fidence in his profession than had the lady of the house. 
 The child died on the following day, and was buried with 
 its ill-fated mother. The authorities, apprised of these 
 doings, ordered an exhumation, and owing to the appear- 
 ances presented, certain organs were removed for chemical 
 analysis. These were divided into two parts, one being 
 tested by the local doctors and the other sent to Professor 
 Christison for separate examination. Meanwhile Margaret 
 was arrested, and emitted a declaration which the judge 
 afterwards described as "replete with misrepresentation, 
 falsehoods, equivocations and contradictions." On her trial 
 the local doctors stated that arsenic was present in the 
 deceased Jean Wishart's stomach and that her death had 
 been occasioned by that poison. As regards the child, no 
 arsenic was recovered. The tests applied by Dr. Christison 
 in the mother's case yielded incontestable evidence of 
 arsenic, though the quantity procured did not exceed the 
 fortieth part of a grain. The defence relied mainly on the 
 prosecutor's failure to trace to the prisoner the purchase or 
 possession of arsenic, and also upon a peculiar incident 
 connected with one of the Crown witnesses. This woman, 
 Mary Greig, an intimate friend of the Wisharts, had been 
 three times sent for to the prison by Margaret, who finally 
 prevailed upon her to say, in presence of the jailer and two 
 fellow-prisoners, that she (Greig) had gone with the blind 
 woman to three several doctors in the town to buy poison, 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 79 
 
 but without success, and that they had in the end obtained 
 some from a chemist. The truth of this sinojular statement 
 the witness on oath solemnly denied, explaining that she 
 had been induced to make it solely out of pity for the 
 prisoner, who " grat and urged sore upon her to say these 
 words." The jailer and the other felons were the chief 
 witnesses for the defence, and the judge, in charging the 
 jury, observed that he " had no hesitation in saying he 
 believed Mary Greig in opposition to him and his associates." 
 Andrew Roy had discreetly vanished ; but David Edward, 
 another boarder, who bore flagrantly false witness in 
 Margaret's behalf, was committed for perjury. The jury 
 found the pannel guilty of poisoning her sister, but found 
 the poisoning of the child not proven ; she was sentenced 
 to death, and was executed at Forfar. 
 
 In view of the part played by the prisoners' declarations 
 in the two cases last cited, it may be remarked that 
 although the ostensible object of a judicial declaration is 
 to enable an accused person voluntarily to explain such 
 circumstances as appear to tell against him, in practice it 
 is apt to prove merely a net to entrap him. The uneducated 
 criminal invariably gives himself away, and even intellectual 
 malefactors, however adroit and wary, often are tripped up 
 by its invidious meshes. The wise say nothing, or are 
 content simply to deny the charge ; but there is in human 
 nature a curious itch of self-justification which few so 
 situated, be they innocent or guilty, seem able to resist, 
 and to this amiable weakness the judicial declaration in- 
 geniously appeals. 
 
 The third poisoning case by which the year 1827 is 
 distinguished is that of Mary Ann Alcorn, a domestic 
 servant, tried in June for administering to her master and 
 mistress, Mr. and Mrs. Roach of Bath Street, Portobello, 
 with intent to murder them, tartar emetic or powder of 
 antimony.(a) Mrs. Roach had told the girl to make a 
 
 (a) Syme's Justiciary Reports, p. 221. 
 
80 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 beefsteak pie and to take it to the baker's to be "fired." 
 She did so, and in due course served the pie at table, when 
 it was noticed that the gravy looked white. Mr, Roach 
 ate heartily, his wife but sparingly ; after dinner both were 
 taken ill with similar symptoms — sickness, internal pain, 
 swelling, feet and hands cold, perspiration — the husband's 
 being much more violent than those of the wife. In the 
 course of the attack Mr. Roach successively took some 
 strong whisky toddy, two cups of coffee, a glass of brandy, 
 and also " Anderson's Pills," the menstruum being more 
 toddy ; but despite the drastic character of this treatment, 
 or perhaps because of it, he "suffered severely afterwards," 
 and for some days his life was in danger. Mary Ann, being 
 apprehended, at first denied, but later admitted having put 
 a powder, which she got from a neighbour's servant, into 
 the pie, " merely for a bit of fun." But for the recovery of 
 the subjects the joke would probably have been her last. 
 It appeared that she had been incited to the act by a 
 discharged servant, with a grudge against the Roaches. 
 The doctor who attended the patients held that some pre- 
 paration of lead, not antimony or tartar emetic, had been 
 employed ; and Dr. Christison, while unable to detect any 
 in the remains of the pie, had no doubt whatever that 
 poison of some sort had been swallowed. The prosecutor 
 withdrew the charge of attempt to murder, and upon that 
 of intent to do grievous bodily harm the jury found a 
 verdict of guilty. A sentence of twelve months with hard 
 labour must have gone some way to correct Mary Ann's 
 defective sense of humour, and was certainly, in the circum- 
 stances, lenient. The contemporary report describes her 
 as " surprised," but whether agreeably or otherwise does 
 not appear. 
 
 We have seen in the case of Mrs. Smith how a timid or 
 stupid jury may, by adopting the Scots form. Not Proven, 
 frustrate the ends of justice. An instance equally scandalous 
 is afforded by the case of John Lovie, tried at Aberdeen in 
 September of the same year for the murder of a servant- 
 
LOCIJSTA IN SCOTLAND 81 
 
 girl, (a) This scoundrel, a farmer near Fraserburgh, had 
 seduced one of his maids named Margaret McKessar, who 
 believed and expected that he would marry her. At the 
 date in question she was some five months with child, and 
 their relations were well known to the other inmates of the 
 farm. One of these, Alexander Rannie, a ploughman of 
 seventeen, was asked by his master how much jalap would 
 constitute a fatal dose, and also as to the relative merits of 
 laudanum and arsenic. The lad referred him for informa- 
 tion upon these points to one Suttie, " a kind of prophesier 
 in the country," but Lovie does not seem to have consulted 
 that expert. Pursuing his scientific enquiries, Lovie in the 
 beginning of August called at a chemist's shop in Fraser- 
 burgh. " Would an ounce of jalap be a good dose — not for 
 a beast but for a body ? " he asked ; being told that it 
 would kill any person, he bought an ounce and said he 
 would divide it. He then asked what was the best poison 
 for rats, and having learned that arsenic was deemed the 
 most efficacious, departed with his purchase. Next day, 
 after dinner, both the ploughman and the girl suifered from 
 a severe attack of dysentery, from which, however, they 
 recovered ; so Lovie paid another visit to the chemist, and 
 said he would now take the poison — " they were much 
 infested with rats." He was supplied, according to the 
 guileless fashion of the time, with an ounce of arsenic. On 
 Tuesday, 14th August, Margaret McKessar rose in her usual 
 health, and after breakfast was seized with violent pain and 
 sickness, which continued throughout the morning, till in 
 the afternoon her sufferings were terminated by death. To 
 the master who was " working at his neeps," Rannie the 
 ploughman brought word of her sudden illness, but Lovie 
 continued his labours, merely remarking that if she were so 
 bad as that, "she would not be long to the fore." The girl's 
 mother was at work near him in the same field, but not 
 only did he fail to acquaint her with her daughter's con- 
 
 {(() Syme'ti .Tusticiary Reports, Appendix No. II. ; Black Kalendar of Abtrdeen, 
 pp. 199, 202 ; Edinburgh Medical Journal, xxi.x. 415. 
 
 6 
 
82 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 dition, but expressly ordered Rannie not to tell her. When 
 they returned to the farm for dinner the girl was dead. 
 Meanwhile a doctor had been sent for by Lovie's mother ; 
 he was from home, but his apprentice came and saw the 
 body ; he " tried her mouth with a candle, and said there 
 was no breath there." Margaret was buried on Thursday ; 
 there had been some talk of having the body opened, but 
 to this Lovie strenuously objected, craftily representing to 
 the girl's relatives the scandal that would ensue should it 
 be found she was " with bairn." The authorities, however, 
 were less susceptible, and on Saturday the body was 
 exhumed in presence of two surgeons from Fraserburgh, 
 who removed certain organs for chemical analysis, parts of 
 which were sent for separate examination to Dr. Blaikie, 
 Aberdeen, and to Dr. Christison, Edinburgh. These 
 gentlemen duly reported that they found in the stomach 
 and its contents oxide of arsenic, which in their decided 
 opinion was the cause of death. When Lovie heard that 
 the body was to be " lifted" he asked a significant question : 
 " Would it swell if she got poison ? " ; and later, being 
 advised by a friend inconfident of his innocence " to take 
 the south road," i.e. to fly the country, he denied his guilt, 
 adding that he had never bought, used or seen any poison 
 in his life. As the result of the investigation Lovie was 
 arrested. In his declaration the prisoner took the customary 
 liberties with truth : he never had intimate relations with 
 the girl, and had no suspicion that she was with child ; he 
 told the chemist that he wanted stuff "to kill vermin upon 
 black cattle," and was unaware that the substance supplied 
 to him was poison ; he used some of it to rub the backs of 
 his cows and laid the remainder in the barn for rats ; he 
 knew nothinoj of the orirl's illness until he went home to 
 dinner, and he denied holding with Rannie and others any 
 conversation regarding poison. All these statements were 
 at the trial proved false, the testimony of the Crown 
 witnesses was unscathed by cross-examination, and the 
 defence called no evidence. Cockburn, who was Lovie's 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 83 
 
 counsel, addressed the jury in his behalf, but no report of 
 the speech survives. Mr. Hill Burton, who notices the case, 
 observes : " Mr. Cockburn made at that trial one of his 
 greatest efforts of persuasive oratory, and delivered an 
 oration which, in seductiveness to such a tribunal as he 
 addressed, has probably never been excelled."(a) The effect 
 of this eloquence — a unanimous verdict of Not Proven — 
 was doubtless for Cockburn no less a personal triumph than 
 had been for Jeffrey the acquittal of Mrs. Smith ; in the 
 interests of justice it can only be regarded as equally 
 deplorable. Cockburn makes no mention of the case 
 in his Journal; one would like to have had his private 
 opinion. 
 
 In the minds of most of us the Clyde passenger steamer 
 is associated with summer memories of days passed upon 
 the waters of that noble estuary, and the idea of wrong- 
 doing in such a connection is limited to the occasional 
 excesses of some too-festive voyager. The curious in these 
 matters, however, may recall that in the Ivcmhoe Lawrie 
 sailed to Arran with his victim Rose, whose body he was to 
 leave hidden amid the lonely corries of Goatfell ; and that by 
 one or other of the steamers on the " Royal Route " Monson 
 passed to and from Ardlamont upon Cecil Hambrough's 
 affairs, and the mysterious Scott made his exit from the 
 scene of the tragedy. These relations are something of the 
 remotest ; yet unlikely as it seems, murder and robbery 
 were once actually done upon a Clyde passenger steamer, 
 for which crimes two persons suffered the last penalty of 
 the law.(/v) The Toward Castle (like Sir Walter, I love to 
 be particular) was built by William Denny, father of the 
 great shipbuilding firm, at Dumbarton in 1822, ten years 
 after the pioneer Comet first threshed with her paddle- 
 wheels the waters of the Firth, and was engined by 
 M' Arthur of Glasgow. A wooden ship of some 79 tons and 
 
 (a) Narratives from Criminal Trials, ii. 61. 
 
 (6) Trial of John Stuart and Catherine Wright or Stuart. Edinburgh, 1829. 
 
84 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 45 horse-power, she plied between Glasgow and Loch Fyne, 
 upon the route so long followed by her famous sister, the 
 Cohimba. On 15th December 1828, there embarked at 
 Tarbert upon the Toivard Caatle, then on her return run 
 to Glasgow, a blacksmith and his wife, John and Catherine 
 Stuart, and a mother and daughter named M'Phail. The 
 parties had foregathered at the inn, where Mrs. M'Phail's 
 luggage was lightened by a ganger of two gallons of whisky 
 which she proposed to smuggle. The Stuarts sympathised 
 with her loss, and as the morning was cold upon the water, 
 they suggested a dram in the cabin. There, as she could 
 not read, Mrs. M'Phail consulted them as to the denomina- 
 tion of certain guinea notes. Her hospitable fellow-travellers 
 then pressed her to sample the ship's beer. " It was very 
 bitter," she afterwards told the jury, " I never tasted such 
 infernal strong beer in my life, and T spat out every drop, 
 and wiped my mouth with my apron." As the old woman 
 could by no means be induced to partake further of their 
 bounty, the pair turned their attention to another passenger, 
 a stout merchant from Ulva, Robert Lamont by name, on 
 whose broad bosom the outline of a bulky pocket-book was 
 plainly visible. He was travelling with a cousin, who 
 preferred to remain on deck. Lamont made no difficulty of 
 accepting gratuitous refreshment, but declined to pay for 
 drinks, deeming the price prohibitive — '' it cost 9d. a bottle " ; 
 and so generously did his hosts stand treat that, as appears 
 from the evidence of the steward, they drank the ship dry 
 — "three gills, three bottles of porter, and a dozen of ale; 
 there was no more on board." One tumbler only was in 
 use, and it was noticed that before Lamont drank, Mrs. 
 Stuart "put the tumbler in below her mantle," and once, 
 as her husband was about to drink, she " pulled it from his 
 mouth and spilt it over his breast, and he damned her for 
 it." When the steamer reached Renfrew Ferry, John 
 Lamont went below to look after his relative, whom he 
 found alone in the dark cabin, insensible, with his empty 
 pocket-book lying on the Hoor at his feet. John at once 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 85 
 
 informed the captain that his cousin had. been robbed, where- 
 upon the Stuarts were " laid hold off" and searched, £19, 7s. 
 in notes and silver, and a black purse, all afterwards proved 
 to have been Lamont's property, being found upon them. 
 When at 6 p.m. the Toivard Castle reached the Broomielaw, 
 Stuart and his wife were taken into custody, and two bottles 
 containing laudanum were discovered in their possession. 
 A doctor, summoned to attend Lamont, applied the stomach- 
 pump, but the patient never regained consciousness, and 
 died that nio;ht aboard the boat. On the trial of the 
 Stuarts at Edinburgh in July 1829, the facts already stated 
 were clearly established. Two surgeons, who conducted 
 the post-mortem, deponed that they saw no sign of natural 
 disease ; Drs. Ure and Corkindale, who made the chemical 
 analysis, reported that laudanum was present in the con- 
 tents of the stomach and probably caused the death. No 
 witnesses were called for the defence ; the jury found both 
 prisoners guilty, and sentence of death was pronounced 
 accordingly. To their own counsel before the trial the 
 couple fully acknowledged their guilt, and it further appears 
 that they had adopted "doping" as a means of livelihood. 
 The practice seems to have been prevalent at the time and 
 other cases are upon record. 
 
 The case of Elizabeth Jeffray, tried at Glasgow in April 
 1838, is noteworthy not only as one of double murder, but 
 from the fact that there was, in the ordinary sense of the 
 term, no motive for the first crime, it being purely experi- 
 mental and, as it were, a rehearsal of the second, (a) This 
 woman, whose " well-moulded form and beautiful counten- 
 ance " favourably impressed her biographer, was in her 
 youth seduced by a " titled villain." After divers less 
 distinguished experiences, she became the wife of a militia- 
 man named Jeffray, and settled at Carluke, where, being 
 unscrupulous and of a passionate temper, she was more 
 
 (u) Swiutoii's Justiciary Reports, ii. 113; A Sketch of the Life and Trial of 
 Mrs. Jeffray. Glasgow, 1838. 
 
86 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 feared than beloved by her neighbours. There lodged with 
 her an infirm old pauper, called Mrs. Carl, and a young 
 miner from Skye, named Munro, who had intrusted his 
 savings — some £10 — to his landlady's keeping, and as he 
 was about to leave Carluke, he naturally required restitu- 
 tion. This on various pretexts she delayed to make ; there 
 was the expense of her daughter's forthcoming marriage, 
 and it was inconvenient for her then to find the money. 
 Munro continuing to press his claim, early in October Mrs. 
 Jeffray sent to a local druggist by a neighbour's child " a 
 line for 3d. worth of arsenic to poison rats," and obtained 
 half an ounce of that specific. On the night of Wednesday, 
 the 4th, old Mrs. Carl being confined to bed, attended only 
 by a boy, her nephew, Mrs. Jeff"ray visited the invalid with 
 a drink of warm whisky, meal and cream of tartar, which 
 she said would do her good. The old woman demurred, 
 but Mrs. Jeffray gave a taste to the boy, who, inferring the 
 wholesomeness of the remedy from its repellent flavour, 
 advised his aunt to take it, which she did. Soon after she 
 became violently ill, and the boy, who was himself sick 
 during the night, roused the landlady to tell her that his 
 aunt was dying ; but Mrs. Jefi'ray refused to rise, as it might 
 waken the lodgers. Next morning Mrs. Carl was dead ; 
 she was buried and, as Lord Braxfield might have said, 
 " nae mair aboot it." A fortnight later Mrs. Jefi'ray called 
 upon the druggist and bought another threepennyworth of 
 arsenic, remarking that " she had killed one rat ivith the 
 first quantity, and she ivanted to try it again." On Saturday, 
 the 28th, Munro left work early in good health and spirits, 
 and ready for his dinner — porridge — which his landlady had 
 prepared. After eating it he was seized with acute pain, 
 vomiting, etc., and went to bed, from which he never rose. 
 Terrible thirst was throughout a marked symptom, and 
 from the first, as is expressively recorded, he " took a fear at 
 the porridge." Despite her lodger's sufi'erings, Mrs. Jefi'ray 
 would not send for a doctor, alleging to several persons who 
 urged her to do so, that Highland folk were " narrow- 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 87 
 
 minded" and Munro would grudge the expense, also that 
 she had been three times for Dr. Rankine, her own doctor, 
 but he was not to be found. On the Monday night, how- 
 ever, she summoned a surgeon, who "thought it was 
 diarrhoea " and prescribed a rhubarb powder, which he pie- 
 pared and left with her to be administered. Instead of 
 relieving the patient who was somewhat easier, the powder 
 made him much worse ; he died in great agony, and was 
 buried next day. Questioned as to Munro's money, which 
 was known to have been in her hands, Mrs. Jeffray explained 
 that she had given it to him to send to his relatives in 
 Skye. On 3rd November her daughter was married with 
 undue magnificence, the number of the bride's frocks pro- 
 voking envious comment. A further sensation was provided 
 next day by the exhumation of Munro's body, followed on 
 the 6th by that of Mrs. Carl. As in neither case was there 
 any indication of natural death, Mrs. Jeffray was appre- 
 hended, and in due course was indicted for the murders. 
 The chemical analyses, conducted as regards Munro by Drs. 
 Logan and Rankine, and as regards Carl by Professors Traill 
 and Christison, were conclusive of the presence of arsenic, 
 which in the opinion of those experts was undoubtedly the 
 cause of death. It was proved that the prisoner had never 
 called for Dr. Rankine, and that Munro had sent no money 
 home to Skye. For the defence, an attempt to give to the 
 supposititious rodents a local habitation in the garret was 
 unsuccessful. After a trial lasting eighteen hours the jury 
 by a majority found the prisoner guilty, but for some 
 inexplicable reason unanimously recommended her to mercy. 
 The judge in passing sentence observed that he could hardly 
 conceive how a double murder came within the limits of 
 mercy, and as the Home Secretary shared his Lordship's 
 difficulty, Mrs. Jeffray paid the full penalty of her crimes. 
 With characteristic firmness she refused to confess her suilt, 
 and died inflexible to the end and unrepentant. 
 
 A case of exceptional interest occurring in 1844 — the 
 trial of Christina Gilmour for the murder of her husband 
 
88 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 — is remarkable both in respect of its unusual features and 
 its surprising result, (a) The daughter of a substantial 
 farmer in Ayrshire, Christina had been educated somewhat 
 above her condition, and as she was as fair as accomplished, 
 her parents expected her to make a good marriage. A 
 suitable parti was found in John Gilmour, a Renfrewshire 
 farmer of worth and means, whom Christina was by her 
 family induced to accept, though she had fixed her heart 
 upon another. The wedding took place in November 1842, 
 and the pair set out for their future home at Inchinnan, 
 near Renfrew. They had no sooner arrived there than the 
 bride announced to her husband that she would never live 
 with him as his wife. How the situation might have 
 developed need not concern us, for six weeks later John 
 Gilmour was in his grave. On 26th December Mrs. 
 Gilmour ordered her maidservant, who was on leave for 
 a couple of days, to buy in Paisley " twopence worth of 
 arsenic to kill rats," which the girl obtained and on her 
 return delivered to her mistress. On the 29th John 
 Gilmour, a strong man of thirty in perfect health, was 
 seized with the symptoms characteristic of arsenical 
 poisoning. Notwithstanding the assiduous attentions of 
 his wife he grew gradually worse. On 6th January Mrs. 
 Gilmour went early to Renfrew for the alleged purpose of 
 getting " something that would do her husband good." 
 On her return she inadvertently dropped a black silk 
 bag, which was picked up by one of the farm hands. He 
 examined it and showed it to the maid, who gave it to 
 her mistress. The contents, a little phial of liquid that 
 smelt like scent and a paper packet marked " Poison," 
 Mrs. Gilmour explained as "turpentine to rub John with." 
 On the 7th a young lady, describing herself as "Miss 
 Robertson " of Paisley, obtained from a Renfrew chemist 
 twopence worth of arsenic upon the well-worn pretext. 
 
 {a) Broun's Justiciary Reports, ii. 23 ; Report of the Trial of Mrs. Oilmour. 
 Edinburgh, 1844 ; Twelve Scots Trials, pp. 191-220. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 89 
 
 At a later stage three witnesses identified the pseudo- 
 nymous purchaser with the fair Christina. 'J'hough during 
 the illness Mrs. Gilmour represented her husband as 
 refusing medical aid, he had without her knowledge sent 
 for a doctor from Renfrew, but that physician being when 
 he came the worse of drink, was in no condition to make 
 a diagnosis. On the 8th, by request of a relative. Dr. 
 M'Kechnie of Paisley visited the patient. He was not 
 satisfied with the case, and told Mrs. Gilmour to preserve 
 for his examination the vomited matter, etc. Calling next 
 day he asked for these, but she said there was so little 
 that it was not worth keeping. On the 11th the doctor 
 found the patient in a dangerous state. Soon after he left 
 John Gilmour died, expressing a wish " to be opened," and 
 exclaiming with his latest breath, " Oh, that woman ! — If 
 you have given me anything, tell me before I die I " The 
 funeral over, Mrs. Gilmour went home to her parents, and 
 resumed correspondence with her first love. Eumour was 
 busy with the farmer's mysterious fate ; his wife had told 
 several people that she had married him against her will 
 and "would rather have preferred one Anderson"; in the 
 whole circumstances, especially in view of her repeated 
 purchases of poison, an enquiry was deemed advisable, 
 and on 22nd April the authorities ordered exhumation. 
 Two doctors having reported that the deceased died from 
 the efi'ects of an acrid poison, probably arsenic, the police 
 w^ent down to Ayrshire with a warrant for the widow's 
 arrest. But tidings of what was afoot had been before 
 them, and Mrs. Gilmour had disappeared. She was traced 
 to Liverpool, from which port she had sailed in a packet- 
 ship for America, but her pursuers, taking a Cunard 
 steamer, reached New York before her. After lengthy 
 proceedings, caused by the feigned insanity of the fugitive, 
 she was extradited and brought back to Scotland. In her 
 declaration before the Sherifi' the prisoner, abandoning the 
 rat motif, said that being unhappy in her marriage, she 
 bought arsenic for the purpose of suicide, but changing 
 
90 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 her mind, destroyed it ; she gave none to her husband. 
 On 12th January 1844, exactly a year after his death, the 
 widow was brought to trial at Edinburgh. The medical 
 evidence as to the cause of death was incontrovertible ; the 
 analytical tests, conducted separately by Drs. M'Kinlay 
 and Christison, established the presence of arsenic in the 
 stomach, liver, and intestines. The defence maintained 
 that John Gilmour had poisoned himself either acci- 
 dentally or voluntarily, but neither proposition received 
 much support from the evidence. The unanimous opinion 
 of the four Crown doctors that arsenic had been given in 
 repeated doses, disposed of the question of suicide. As to 
 the theory of accident, it appeared that long before his 
 marriage Gilmour once poisoned some rats with arsenic, 
 which he got from a neighbouring farmer ; but there was 
 no proof that any of the poison remained in his possession. 
 The defence called no witnesses; and after a damning 
 speech by the Lord Advocate and a sentimental address 
 from the other side, the Lord Justice-Clerk (Hope) charged 
 strono-ly in favour of an acquittal, and the jury followed 
 the judicial lead. So Christina returned to her native 
 parish, where, though she did not after all get Anderson, 
 she lived to a ripe and venerable age. A certain clergyman 
 told me once that as a boy he often saw her in church — a 
 charming old lady, serene and beautiful, famed throughout 
 the district for her singular piety. 
 
 The curious unwillingness of juries to convict a woman 
 upon a charge of poisoning on evidence merely circumstantial 
 however cogent, is, as we have seen and shall continue to 
 find, a marked feature of such cases. A flagrant example is 
 that of Janet Campbell or M'Lellan, tried at Edinburgh in 
 November 1846 for the murder of her husband, James 
 M'Lellan, a weaver at Dunning, Perthshire, nearly thirty 
 years his wife's senior.(a) She had an intrigue with a 
 lodf^er, resulting in the birth of twins, and the domestic 
 
 (o) Arkley's Justiciary Reports, p. 137. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 91 
 
 atmosphere was in consequence perturbed. The goodman 
 made a practice at family prayers of referring pointedly to 
 her transgression, which, instead of comforting the fair 
 penitent, so exasperated her that on one occasion she pur- 
 sued the suppliant with an axe. On 3rd July, M'Lellan, 
 a hale man for his years, was taken ill, with symptoms 
 indicating arsenic, after breakfast prepared by his wife. 
 Next day, feeling "a good deal settleder," he was able 
 to rise, but after breakfast the symptoms recurred in 
 aggravated form. His wife was strangely annoyed when 
 he was sick in a vessel containino- " the sow's meat." 
 
 o 
 
 Advised to invoke medical aid, she refused to do so — " he 
 [her husband] was not so ready sending for skill to her 
 when she needed it"; but M'Lellan insisted on seeing a 
 doctor, as he believed he had been poisoned. Dr. Young, 
 when he came, formed the like opinion, which was confirmed 
 on his detecting arsenic in the vomited matter. The patient 
 died that night, and his widow was arrested. In her 
 declaration the prisoner denied that she ever had in her 
 possession, or attempted to procure, poison. At the trial, 
 it was proved that she applied personally to Dr. Young for 
 arsenic " to poison rats," which, owing to the notoriously 
 strained relations of the spouses, the physician declined to 
 give her ; that she then sent a girl, Davidson, to buy arsenic 
 from Dr. Martin, but without success ; and that on two 
 occasions within a week of the death she obtained from 
 a chemist by another girl, Aitken, twopence worth of that 
 poison. She explained the second purchase to Aitken by 
 saying that a mason who lodged with her " had tramped 
 upon the saucer in which the former quantity had been 
 placed," which the mason at the trial swore was false. No 
 trace of poison could be found in her house, nor was there 
 any evidence of how she had disposed of it. Dr. Thomson 
 of Perth and Professor Christison found arsenic " to a con- 
 siderable extent" in the stomach, liver and lungs of the 
 deceased, and were confident that it caused his death. For 
 the defence, Dr. Martin's assistant said that, when the twins 
 
92 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 were born, M'Lellan asked him for "'poison to kill rats," 
 which he refused to supply ; and an old flame of M'Lellan's 
 stated that once upon a time she had rejected his suit, 
 whereupon he threatened suicide. But as this incident took 
 place thirty years before, it seemed improbable that the 
 effects would be so far-reaching. The Lord Justice-Clerk 
 told the jury that looking to the whole circumstances of 
 the case, it was impossible to suppose the deceased had 
 poisoned himself; yet that enlightened tribunal returned a 
 verdict of Not Guilty ! One wonders what amount of proof 
 ivould have sufficed for those disciples of Didymus. 
 
 A case tried at Glasgow in January 1850 is an inter- 
 esting exception to the general rule I have mentioned. 
 The scene was the village of Strathaven in Lanarkshire : 
 the characters, Margaret Lennox or Hamilton, a young 
 married woman, and her sister-in-law. (a) Jean Hamilton, 
 lately in service with the Rev. Mr. Campbell, an Edinburgh 
 minister, had been seduced by that divinC; who paid her 
 £26 as aliment for her expected child. It is gratifying to 
 know that he was in consequence deposed. The girl re- 
 turned to her mother's house, where in due course she 
 gave birth to a child. She was attended by Margaret, but 
 instead of making a good recovery, she was attacked by 
 frequent sickness. On 7th July Margaret obtained from 
 a doctor for the invalid a calomel powder, upon taking 
 which Jean became violently sick. Margaret undertook to 
 bring the doctor to see her, but failed to do so, and next day 
 the girl died. A post-mortem was held, and on subsequent 
 analyses by Professors Penny and Crawford, twenty grains 
 of arsenic were found in the stomach. Shortly before the 
 death Margaret obtained from an apothecary's wife arsenic "to 
 kill rats," but in her declaration she altered the objective to 
 buo-s. The clerical endowment had been placed upon deposit 
 receipt in Jean's name wdth the local bank. Lord Cockburn, 
 who tried the case, gives the following account of it : 
 
 (a) Edinburgh Evening Courant, 12th January 1850. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 93 
 
 The poisoner had first stolen the bank deposit receipt, and finding 
 that she could not get the money without the owner's signature, she 
 forged it, and then, having committed these two offences, she murdered 
 the victim in order to hide them. She was tried for the whole three 
 crimes. The forgery and the administration of arsenic were very clearly 
 proved. But there was a doubt about the theft, and therefore the jury 
 found it not proved. Yet upon this fact a majority of them grounded by 
 far the most nonsensical recommendation to mercy that any jury known 
 to me ever made themselves ludicrous by. They first recommended 
 without stating any reason, and on being asked what their reason was, 
 they retired, and after consultation returned with these written words, 
 viz. : that they gave the recommendation " in consequence of the first 
 charge of theft not having been proved, which they believe in a great 
 measure led to the commission of the subsequent crime"! Grammatic- 
 ally, this means that it was their acquittal of the theft that did the 
 mischief, but what they meant was, that the murder was caused by a 
 theft not proved to have existed. It is the most Hibernian recom- 
 mendation I have ever seen. Though backed by the whole force of 
 the very active party opposed to capital punishment, it failed, and the 
 poor wretch' died. (a) 
 
 In July of the same year there was tried at Edinburgh 
 a case which, in its hideous blend of hypocrisy and cruelty, 
 anticipates and rivals that of Dr. Pritchard.(6) William 
 Bennison, an Irishman, when a lad of twenty, married 
 Mary Mullen at Armagh in 1838. He deserted her in the 
 following year, and at Paisley bigamously married Jane 
 Hamilton. A few weeks afterwards he returned to Ireland 
 and brought his first wife to Airdrie, where she fell sick 
 and died, probably by poison. He then rejoined his other 
 spouse, to whom he presented the wardrobe of her pre- 
 decessor as the clothes of " his deceased sister Mary." 
 Later, the second Mrs. Bennison learned that her sister- 
 in-law was alive and well ; but her husband explained that 
 the deceased of whom he had spoken was " only his sister 
 in the Lord." Thereafter the couple removed to Edin- 
 burgh, where they occupied a flat in Stead's Place, Leith 
 Walk. An enthusiastic Methodist, Bennison received from 
 
 (a) Circuit Journe.ys^ pp. 3()2, 363. 
 
 (6) Shaw's Justiciary lleports, p. 453 ; .1 Full RepoH of the Trial of JViUiam 
 Bennison. Leitli, 1850, 
 
94 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 his pastor at the trial a glowing character. He took 
 the keenest interest in the spiritual welfare of the flock, 
 never missed a meeting, was an eager proselytizer, visited 
 the sick, and possessed a notable gift of fluency in prayer. 
 His character was akin to those " holy Luthers of the 
 preaching North " of whom we read in Synge's Playboy of 
 the Western World. The favourite convert of this modern 
 Major Weir was a girl named Robertson, the sharer of 
 his pew in chapel and the consoler of his leisure hours. 
 "Their conversation," says Miss Robertson, "was always 
 of religion." Mrs. Bennison, thousfh not a strono- woman, 
 enjoyed fair health ; her sister, Ellen Glass, w^as surprised 
 to hear from Bennison on Sunday, 14th April, that his 
 wife had been seized with illness and that the doctor 
 despaired of her life. She hastened to the house and 
 found her sister, whom she had seen shortly before in 
 her usual health, violently sick and in great pain. She 
 remained with the suff"erer, as, in her own expressive 
 phrase, " she saw that death was on' her." As a matter 
 of fact no doctor had seen the patient, and when it was 
 suggested to send for one, Bennison said, " It's of no use ; 
 she is going home to glory." Mrs. Bennison told her sister 
 she was taken ill after eating porridge. She died that 
 night. During her last hours her husband, who had asked 
 for the prayers of the congregation, busied himself in pre- 
 paring " the dead clothes " and writing funeral letters, so 
 that when all was over the final arrangements were well 
 in hand. Advised of his loss — he had never entered the 
 sickroom — he piously remarked, "Thank God! She has 
 gone to glory." The burial took place forthwith, Bennison 
 drawing £11 from divers benefit societies of which he was 
 a member. He informed his tailor, from whom before the 
 death he had bespoken mournings, that he had never seen 
 a "pleasanter" deathbed. Now it happened that, when his 
 wife lay dying, Bennison put out some cooked potatoes, 
 which were devoured by two of the neighbours' dogs ; 
 these presently died in agony, the fact aroused suspicion. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 95 
 
 and a rumour spread that Mrs. Bennison had been 
 poisoned. The widower was much distressed. He called 
 upon a druggist named M'Donald, and referred to a recent 
 purchase by him from M'Donald's wife of half an ounce of 
 arsenic "for rats in the cellar," on which he feared the 
 authorities might put a false construction. He hoped 
 M'Donald would say nothing about it : "As 1 got it from 
 your wife, you can easily say I did not get it from you." 
 This casuistry not commending itself to the chemist, 
 Bennison said that God had carried him through many 
 difficulties, and would doubtless see him through this one. 
 He was, as will appear, mistaken. Next day the body 
 was exhumed in presence of the bereaved husband, who 
 identified it as that of his " dear Jane." He was subse- 
 quently arrested on the charges of bigamy and murder. 
 At his trial Dr. (afterwards Sir Douglas) Maclagan stated 
 that he found arsenic in the stomach and liver of the 
 deceased. He also detected its presence in a vessel into 
 which she had vomited, and in a piece of paper recovered 
 from the grate ; but he failed to find any in the bodies of 
 the dogs. From the symptoms, morbid appearances, and 
 results by analysis, he had no hesitation in attributing the 
 death to arsenic. Drs. Spittal and Anderson corroborated. 
 The jury unanimously found the prisoner guilty, and he 
 was sentenced to death. On leaving the dock he made a 
 canting speech, in which he declared his innocence before 
 God and forgave the sins of the Crown witnesses. 
 Bennison in the end confessed his crime — he had put 
 arsenic in the porridge — and was duly executed. Seldom 
 has a fouler scoundrel graced the gallows. His case is 
 the subject of an instructive article in the Edinburgh 
 Courant,{a) dealing with the strange atiinity between 
 religious enthusiasm and crime. 
 
 Apart from those criminals who by the incompetence or 
 pig-headedness of juries escape the grasp of justice, there is 
 
 (a) 29tli July 1850. 
 
96 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 a smaller class who owe their immunity from punishment 
 to some loophole in the law itself. Of such technical 
 acquittals three examples may here be noted. At Glasgow 
 in May 1843 Mary M'Farlane or Taylor was charged with 
 a double murder. (a) When the diet was called, ol)jection 
 was taken to the citation of the pannel in respect of an 
 error in date, and the case was certified to the High Court. 
 This certification was fallen from, and no further proceedings 
 were taken. Similar results followed in nineteen other 
 cases at the same circuit. Lord Cockburn, who presided, 
 observes : 
 
 There was also the case of a woman accused of murdering her husband, 
 but it was one of the twenty, and did not come on. It will be a famous 
 case in its day, however. She first committed the capital offence of giving 
 her husband a dose of arsenic, which very nearly killed him, but he 
 survived it. Thinking, truly, that it was her unskilfulness in administer- 
 ing that made this dose fail, she resolved to improve herself by a little 
 practice, and then to renew the attempt. She therefore experimented 
 upon a neighbour, whom she killed ; and having now ascertained how to 
 proceed, she gave another dose to her spouse, and killed him too. She 
 was indicted for the two murders and the abortive administration, an 
 awkward accumulation of charges. It being in her case that the motion 
 to put off all the trials was made, she was brought to the bar ; and, whether 
 it was fancy or not, struck me as having a very singular expression. She 
 was little, apparently middle-aged, modest and gentle looking, with firm- 
 set lips, a pale countenance, and suspicious restless eyes.(i) 
 
 This scandalous miscarriage of justice led to an amend- 
 ment in the practice of citing parties at circuit ayres. The 
 second instance is the case of Janet Hope or Walker at 
 Edinburgh in July 1845.(c) This woman, wife of the land- 
 lord of the Blue Bell Inn, Lockerbie, was charged with 
 poisoning by arsenic George Tedcastle, her son by a former 
 husband. While incarcerated in Dumfries jail the prisoner 
 confessed her guilt to the keeper, who had constituted 
 himself her spiritual adviser. At the trial, a question as 
 to what she said to him being disallowed, the prosecutor 
 
 (a) Broun's Justiciary Reports, i. 550. (h) Circuit Journeits, \\ 190. 
 
 (c) Broun's Justiciary Reports, ii. 465. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 97 
 
 abandoned the charge, and a verdict of not guilty was 
 returned. The third and most deplorable example occurred 
 at Inverness in April 1852, where Sarah Anderson or Eraser 
 and James Fraser, her son, were convicted of poisoning 
 William Fraser, Inver, Easter Ross, husband of one, and 
 father of the other pannel.(a) Fraser was sixty years of 
 ao-e, his wife forty, and their son seventeen. Purchases of 
 arsenic by Mrs. Fraser at Tain were proved, following upon 
 which the husband became suddenly ill. Before his death 
 she was heard to say that if she were a widow, there would 
 be none happier in Ross-shire. No doctor was sent for, 
 and the man died with all the usual symptoms. Forty-five 
 letters written by mother and son to each other were 
 recovered ; and on his judicial examination the son was 
 asked to explain certain passages : — " Hasten the day when 
 you will be a widow" ; " I pray to heaven I will soon have 
 it in my power to release you from the tyrant" ; " I wish 
 the world were rid of such a monster " ; " Many others 
 have wished my father's death as well as I " ; "If you have 
 any spunk you will not be long in your present condition," 
 etc. He declared that his father was unkind to his mother 
 — of which, by the way, there was no evidence — and what 
 he meant was, that he hoped soon to be in a position to 
 support her. The mother declared that all the arsenic was 
 consumed by rats. On their trial their guilt was clearly 
 proved, and the jury found accordingly ; but sentence was 
 delayed, owing to an objection taken for the defence to the 
 admission of certain evidence. In the list of productions 
 a packet of powder, sent to Dr. Maclagan for analysis, 
 which he found to be arsenic, was described as a " sealed 
 packet," whereas, though the seals were intact, the wrapper 
 had been cut by him in order that he might examine the 
 contents. The point was certified for the consideration of 
 the High Court. On 1st June, before that tribunal, it was 
 
 (a) Irvine's Justiciaiy Reports, i. 1,66; OouraiU ; Scotsman; 17th April 
 1852. 
 
 7 
 
98 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 further objected that no precise day had been fixed for the 
 diet being called, so the diet was held to have fallen, and 
 the warrant against the prisoners was discharged. On 12th 
 July an attempt by the Crown to proceed against them 
 upon a new indictment failed, the Court holding that, 
 havino- tholed an assize, they could not again be tried for 
 the same ofi'ence. Thus, thanks to these red-tape entangle- 
 ments, two convicted murderers were restored to society. 
 Lord Cockburn, who presided at their trial, has given his 
 impressions of the case : 
 
 The only interesting case was that of Mrs. and Mr. Fraser, a mother 
 and her son (a lad), who had chosen to poison their father, a shopkeeper 
 in Eoss-shire. They thought him a useless creature, and that they would 
 be better without him, especially as the wife had forged his name to bills, 
 in reference to which his removal before they became due would be con- 
 venient. I never saw a couple of less amiable devils. The mother, 
 especially, had a cold hard eye, and a pair of thin resolute lips, producing 
 an expression very fit for a remorseless and steady murderess. She saw 
 her daughter, a little girl, brought in as a witness, and heard her swear 
 that there were no rats in the house and that her father's sufferings were 
 very severe, with a look of calm ferocity which would have done no dis- 
 credit to the worst woman in hell. They were both convicted, but I fear 
 the gallows won't get its due . . . which will be a pity.(a) 
 
 We have seen that his Lordship's fear was justified. 
 
 As it too rarely happens that we have the advantage of 
 a judge's private opinion upon cases tried before him, I shall 
 give one other instance from Lord Cockburn's reminiscences : 
 that of Elliott Millar at Jedburgh in September 1847.(6) 
 
 The only curious case on this Circuit was that of a worthy husband 
 who wanted to get his spouse killed ; but instead of resorting to common- 
 place violence by himself, he tried to make the law do it. For this 
 purpose he fell upon the device of making it appear that she had poisoned 
 him ; for which she was committed for trial and was very near being tried. 
 But suspicion being excited, it was discovered that his whole statements 
 on precognition were false, and all his dexterous imitations of being 
 poisoned, utter fabrications. The result was that he was brought to trial 
 himself for fraud, and was transported for seven years.(c) 
 
 {a) Circuit Journeys, p. 377. (6) Arkley's Justiciary Reports, p. 355. 
 
 (c) Circuit Journeys, p. 333. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 99 
 
 It appears that this ingenious rascal complained of 
 illness after breakfast ; took an emetic, saying his wife had 
 poisoned him ; and preserved for examination the coffee and 
 vomited matter. These on analysis were found to contain 
 sugar of lead, which, as he subsequently confessed, he had 
 himself introduced from a supply obtained by his wife with 
 a view to suicide, in attempting which she was unsuccessful I 
 
 Confronted with the task of tackling in a single para- 
 graph the complexities of our greatest cause celehre, I envy 
 the skill of those caligraphists who within the compass of a 
 threepenny piece can depict our most familiar prayer. But 
 though it is impossible in such conditions to appreciate 
 Madeleine Smith's achievement, no paper on Scots poisoning 
 would be complete without her. (a) The daughter of an 
 architect of position in Glasgow, Madeleine at nineteen was 
 a dashing damsel, accomplished and attractive, an ornament 
 of middle-class society in that city. Her charms caught 
 the roving eye of a young Frenchman, L'Angelier, clerk in 
 a commercial house, and he contrived through a common 
 friend an introduction to her in the street. This ill-omened 
 meeting occurred in 1855. Socially, of course, L'Angelier 
 was impossible ; but he was a good-looking little " bounder," 
 and the girl fell in love with him. They corresponded 
 constantly, with that amazing mid-Victorian voluminosity 
 which, happily, is a lost art, and met as often as circum- 
 stances permitted. No one in Madeleine's set knew of their 
 intimacy ; but a romantic spinster friend of L'Angelier, Miss 
 Perry, acted as go-between, and one of the Smith's maids 
 connived at their clandestine meetings. In the spring of 
 1856 the flirtation developed into an intrigue, the changed 
 relations of the lovers being reflected in the tropical and 
 abandoned tone of the fair correspondent. They addressed 
 one another as "husband" and "wife," and there can be 
 little doubt that in the belief of L'Angelier, as well as by 
 
 (a) Irvine's .Justiciary Reports, ii. 641 ; Trial of Madeleine Smith, edited by 
 A. Duncau Smith, 1905. 
 
100 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 the law of Scotland, tliey actually were married. An 
 elopement was anticipated, but the gallant's official salary 
 amounted only to ten shillings a week and the lady was 
 quite dependent on her parents, so the prospect was none 
 of the brightest. In November 1856 the Smiths occupied 
 a main-door corner house, No. 7 Blythswood Square. The 
 stanchioned w^indows of Madeleine's bedroom in the base- 
 ment opened directly upon, and were partly below the level 
 of, the pavement of the side street ; it was the lovers' 
 custom to converse at these, the sunk part formed a con- 
 venient letter-box, and when the coast was clear she could 
 take him into the house. In the flat above lived a gentle- 
 man named Minnoch, who began to pay his charming 
 neighbour marked attentions. Whether or not the copious- 
 ness of her draughts of passion had induced satiety, Made- 
 leine v/as quick to realise that her position as the wife of a 
 prosperous Glasgow merchant would be very different from 
 her future with the little French clerk, so she gave her 
 responsible wooer every encouragement. On 28 th January 
 1857, with the approbation of her parents, she accepted his 
 hand. Meantime her correspondence with L'Angelier was 
 maintained at the accustomed temperature, till, early in 
 February, she made an efl"ort to break the " engagement," 
 and demanded the return of her letters. Rumours of Mr. 
 Minnoch's attentions had reached L'Angelier ; he suspected 
 what was afoot, taxed her with perfidy, and refused to give 
 up the letters to anyone but her father. The mere sugges- 
 tion drove Madeleine well-nigh crazy : the letters were 
 indeed such as no parent ever read and few daughters could 
 have written ; she poured forth frantic appeals for mercy 
 and solemnly denied that she had broken faith ; she 
 besought him to come to her and she would explain every- 
 thing. L'Angelier stood firm ; he has been called black- 
 guard and blackmailer ; as I read the facts, it was neither 
 revenge nor money that he wanted, but his wife. " I will 
 never give them up," he told his friend Kennedy, " she shall 
 never marry another man so long as I live " ; adding with 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 101 
 
 prophetic significance, "Tom, she'll be the death of me." 
 A reconciliation was effected on 12 th February, the corre- 
 spondence was resumed on the old footing, and L'Angelier 
 became again "her love, her pet, her sweet Emile." He 
 told Miss Perry he was to see Madeleine on the 19th. That 
 night he left his lodgings, taking the pass-key as he intended 
 to be late ; next morning his landlady found him writhing 
 in agony on his bedroom floor, with all the symptoms of 
 irritant poisoning. Whether the lovers had met or not is 
 disputed, but in his diary, production of which at the trial 
 was disallowed, L'Angelier wrote: " Thurs. 19. Saw Mimi 
 a few moments — was very ill during the night." He 
 recovered, but was never the same man afterwards. At 
 4 A.M. on Monday, 23rd, L'Angelier rang for his landlady, 
 who found him suffering from another similar attack. The 
 diary records : " Sun. 22. Saw Mimi in drawing-room — 
 Promised me French Bible — Taken very ill." This meeting 
 is otherwise established under Madeleine's own hand : " You 
 did look bad on Sunday night and Monday morning. 1 
 think you get sick with walking home so late and the long 
 want of food, so the next time we meet I shall make you 
 eat a loaf of bread before you go out." L'Angelier said to 
 Miss Perry, " I can't think why I was so unwell after 
 getting coff'ee and chocolate from her [Madeleine]," referring 
 to two different occasions ; "If she were to poison me I 
 would forgive her." He also told his friend Towers that 
 he thought he had been poisoned twice, after taking coffee 
 and cocoa. Now, prior to the first illness, Madeleine made 
 an abortive attempt to procure prussic acid — "for her 
 hands " — but no arsenic could then be traced to her posses- 
 sion. The day before the second attack she bought from 
 Murdoch, a druggist, one ounce of arsenic " to send to the 
 gardener at the country house " — Mr. Smith's summer villa 
 at Row, on the Gareloch. On 5th March L'Angelier, whose 
 jealousy had reawakened, wrote insisting on knowing the 
 truth about Mr. Minnoch ; that day Madeleine purchased 
 from Currie, another druggist, a second ounce of arsenic 
 
102 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAHD 
 
 "to kill rats in Blythswood Square," and on the 6th she 
 went with her family for ten days to Bridge of Allan. 
 Mr. Minnoch was of the party, and the wedding was fixed 
 for June. L'Angelier, on sick leave, had gone to Edinburgh, 
 impatiently awaiting Madeleine's return, when everything 
 was to be explained; on the 19th he followed her to Bridge 
 of Allan. But Madeleine had come back on the 17th, and 
 next day she obtained from Currie a third ounce of arsenic 
 — "the first was so effectual." On the evening of Sunday, 
 22nd, L'Angelier returned to his lodgings : a letter for- 
 warded to him from Glaso-ow had brous^ht him home in hot 
 haste ; he looked well and happy, and after a hasty meal 
 hurried away, saying he might be out late. At 2.30 a.m. 
 his landlady, aroused by the pealing of the door bell, found 
 him doubled up with agony upon the threshold. He was 
 put to bed and a doctor sent for, who formed a hopeful 
 prognosis; " I am far worse than the doctor thinks," cried 
 the patient. He said nothing as to the cause of his illness, 
 but asked to see Miss Perry ; when that lady arrived 
 L'Angelier's lips were sealed for ever. In his pocket was 
 found the last letter of a remarkable series : 
 
 Why my beloved did you not come to me. Oh beloved are you ill. 
 Come to me sweet one. I waited and waited for you but you came not. 
 I shall wait again to-morrow night same hour and arrangement. Do come 
 sweet love my own dear love of a sweetheart. Come beloved and clasp 
 me to your heart. Come and we shall be happy. A kiss fond love. 
 Adieu with tender embraces ever believe me to be your own ever dear 
 fond MiMi. 
 
 The postmark was Glasgow, 21st March. L'Angelier's 
 half of the fatal correspondence was discovered, Madeleine 
 fled to Row and was brought back by her fiance ; an 
 examination of the body pointed to poison, and she was 
 apprehended. In her declaration she said that she had 
 not seen L'Angelier for three weeks ; the appointment was 
 for Saturday, 21st, he came neither that night nor the 
 next ; her purpose in making it was to tell him of her 
 eno-ao-ement. As to the arsenic, she used it all as a 
 
 o o 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 103 
 
 cosmetic, on the advice of a school-friend. She admitted 
 giving cocoa to L'Angelier once at her window. Of the 
 nine days' wonder of her trial at Edinburgh in July 1 
 have small space left to speak. No less than 88 grains 
 of arsenic were found in the body, and the defence made 
 much of the fact that this was the greatest quantity ever 
 detected, arguing that so large a dose indicated suicide 
 rather than murder. The unsoundness of this contention 
 is proved by two subsequent English cases, (a) where 150 
 and 154 grains respectively were recovered. As regards 
 the first two charges — of administration — the Crown was 
 handicapped by the exclusion of L'Angelier's diary, and 
 in the murder charge, by inability to prove the actual 
 meeting of the parties on the Sunday night. There was 
 proof that L'Angelier had talked once or twice in a 
 vapouring way of suicide, but none that he ever had 
 arsenic in his possession. The prisoner's account of her 
 object in acquiring arsenic was contradicted by her old 
 school-fellow, and the fact that what she obtained was, 
 in terms of the Statute,(6) mixed with soot and indigo, 
 rendered it strangely uninviting for toilet purposes. On 
 the other hand, the doctors noticed no colouring matter 
 in the body, but to this point their attention was not then 
 directed. On the question of motive, it was maintained 
 that the prisoner had nothing to gain by L'Angelier's death 
 if her letters remained in his possession. These, however, 
 having neither address nor any signature except "Mimi," 
 afforded little clue to the writer's identity. But surely it 
 was his silence that was for her the supreme object : how 
 could that be ensured save by his death ? Lord Advocate 
 Moncreiff's masterly address, strong, restrained, convincing, 
 was then, as now, unduly eclipsed by the brilliant emotional 
 speech of John Inglis for the defence, held to be the finest 
 ever delivered in a Scots court. The one appealed to the 
 head, the other to the heart; each pledged his personal 
 
 (a) B. V. Dodds, 1860, and E. v. Hemtt, 1863. 
 
 (b) 14 Vict. c. 13, s. 3. 
 
104 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 belief in the rightness of his cause. Lord Justice-Clerk 
 Hope's charge favoured an acquittal ; the jury found the 
 pannel not guilty of the first charge, the other two not 
 proven. In the popular verdict, " If she did not poison 
 him, she ought to have done it," I am unable to concur. 
 The amazing self-command with which the prisoner faced 
 her ordeal, no less than her youth and beauty, inspired 
 the pens of contemporary scribes. During the trial she 
 received many proposals, lay and clerical ; her fiance was 
 not an offerer. A surgeon named Tudor Hora was pre- 
 ferred, with whom she emigrated to Australia. Returning 
 to England after his death, she was married on 4th July 
 1861 at St. Paul's, Knightsbridge, to Mr. George Wardle, 
 an artist. She is said to have died in Melbourne in 
 1893.(a) 
 
 There is in the trial at Glasgow in December 1857 of 
 John Thomson alias Peter Walker, known as the Eagles- 
 ham case — the first in Scotland for murder by hydrocyanic 
 or prussic acid — a curious echo of that which we have just 
 considered. (6) Thomson was employed as a journeyman 
 tailor in the village of Eaglesham, near Glasgow. A girl 
 named Montgomery had rejected his addresses and he 
 vowed revenge. Thomson was much interested in the 
 newspaper reports of Madeleine Smith's trial, discussed 
 the relative drawbacks attending the use of arsenic and 
 of prussic acid, and expressed his strong opinion that 
 she should have been hanged. Having obtained by the 
 carrier's boy from a Glasgow chemist 2 drachms of 
 Scheele's prussic acid, for use as a " hair dye," Thomson 
 on 13th September administered it to Montgomery in 
 beer, leavinsj the girl locked in her room. She was found 
 in a dying condition, and her death certified as due to 
 apoplexy. On the 23rd, after ordering a second supply, 
 he left his situation for Glasgow, where he attempted 
 
 (a) Notes and Queries, ii. S. iv. 311. 
 
 (6) Irvine's Justiciary Reports, ii. 747 ; Report of the Trial of John Thomson 
 alias Peter Walker Edinburgh, 1858 ; " Poison and Plagiary," infra, pp. 121-142. 
 
LOCUSTA TN SCOTLAND 105 
 
 gratuitously to poison in whisky Mr. and Mrs. Mason, with 
 whom he lodged. Suspicion was aroused, Montgomery's 
 body was exhumed and examined, and Drs. IM'Kmlay 
 and Maclagan detected prussic acid in the stomach and 
 spleen. Convicted on circumstantial evidence, Thomson 
 was executed, confessing his guilt. 
 
 Glasgow contributes further to our subject the case of 
 Dr. Pritchard, tried at Edinburgh in July 1865 for the 
 poisoning of his wife by repeated doses of antimony, and of 
 his mother-in-law by antimony and aconite. (a) " When 
 a doctor does go wrong," Mr. Sherlock Holmes once 
 remarked to his egregious colleague, " he is the first of 
 criminals. He has nerve and he has knowledge. Palmer 
 and Pritchard were among the heads of their profession." 
 A hypocritical charlatan with a German diploma, hand- 
 some, plausible, and unscrupulous, Pritchard, after a varie- 
 gated career, came to Glasgow in 1860. Though disliked 
 and distrusted by his medical brethren he acquired a con- 
 siderable practice; but his reputation suffered by his 
 "treatment" of certain lady patients, and a fire in his 
 house in Berkeley Terrace, involving the mysterious death 
 of a servant girl, followed by a fraudulent claim on an 
 insurance company, hardly enhanced his fame. An adept 
 at self-advertisement, he was an enthusiastic Mason and a 
 popular lecturer on his experiences of foreign travel, which, 
 as he was unhampered by the laws of truth, were rich in 
 surprising detail. His family worshipped him ; his wife, 
 to whom he was flagrantly unfaithful, was ready to accept 
 anything— even poison — at his hands, while of his mother- 
 in-law he is said to have been the idol In 1864 we find 
 Pritchard established at No. 131 (now 249) Sauchiehall 
 Street, the household consisting of himself, his wife and 
 children, a cook and a nurse- housemaid. The latter, Mary 
 M'I.eod, a girl of 16, had been the year before seduced by 
 him and the subject of an illegal operation at his hands. 
 
 (a) Irvine's Justiciary Reports, v. 88 ; Trial «/" Jh. Pritchard, edited by- 
 William Rougheai), 1906. 
 
106 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 Mrs. Pritchard was aware of the intimacy. Two medical 
 students boarded in the house. Mrs. Pritchard's illness 
 began in October with persistent sickness. In November 
 she went to see her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Taylor, at No. 1 
 Lauder Road, Edinburgh, where she stayed till Christmas. 
 During the visit she was greatly better, but on her return 
 home the sickness recommenced, occurring after food. 
 Pritchard ascribed her illness to gastric fever, and Dr. 
 Cowan of Edinburgh, her cousin, saw her ; he did not con- 
 sider her seriously ill. On 1st February 1865 she had a 
 violent attack of cramp ; Dr. (afterwards Sir William) 
 Gairdner was sent for. The case puzzled him — there were 
 no symptoms of fever, he thought she was intoxicated ; so 
 he wrote to the lady's brother. Dr. Michael Taylor, Penrith, 
 recommending her removal to his care ; but Pritchard 
 said she was not w^ell enough to travel. Meanwhile Dr. 
 Cowan had told Mrs. Taylor that she ought to go to 
 Glasgow to look after her daughter, and on the 10th the 
 old lady arrived from Edinburgh. She was a hale woman of 
 seventy, but in the habit of taking for neuralgic headaches 
 Battley's Sedative Solution, a preparation of opium. On 
 the 13th some tapioca prepared for the invalid was eaten 
 by Mrs. Taylor, who immediately became sick, remarking 
 that she must have got the same complaint as her daughter, 
 upon whom she was in constant attendance. On the 
 evening of the 24th Mrs. Taylor had tea with the family, 
 wrote some letters in the consulting-room, and walked 
 upstairs to her daughter's room, telling the maid to order 
 sausages for supper. A few minutes later she was seized 
 with illness, and rapidly became unconscious. Dr. Paterson 
 was summoned, to w^hom Pritchard falsely stated that the 
 old lady, while writing letters, had fallen off her chair in a 
 fit and was carried upstairs, adding that she was given to 
 liquor. Dr. Paterson examined her ; she was dying, said 
 he, under the influence of some strong narcotic, and 
 Pritchard explained that she was in the habit of taking 
 opium. Dr. Paterson was much struck by the ghastly 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 107 
 
 appearance of Mrs. Pritchard, sitting up in bed behind her 
 dying mother. He formed the opinion that she was being 
 poisoned with antimony, but " professional etiquette " pre- 
 vented him interfering, and he left the house. Mrs. Taylor 
 died that night. In her pocket was found the bottle of 
 Battley, of which Pritchard took possession, saying it 
 would never do for a man in his position to have it talked 
 about. After the death, he met Dr. Paterson in the street 
 and asked him to call on Mrs. Pritchard, which that 
 gentleman did, confirming his impression that she was the 
 victim of foul play. When Pritchard sent to him for Mrs. 
 Taylor's death certificate Dr. Paterson refused to grant it, 
 and wrote to the Registrar that the death was " sudden, 
 unexpected, and to him mysterious " ; this he thought 
 should open the eyes of the authorities, but the Registrar 
 destroyed tlie letter and did nothing further. So Mrs. 
 Taylor was buried by her disconsolate son-in-law in the 
 Grange Cemetery, Edinburgh. Mrs Pritchard's lingering 
 illness continued, " one day better and two days worse," 
 despite the unremitting care of her loving husband and 
 physician. On 13th March he sent by M'Leod to the 
 patient a piece of cheese, which she asked the girl to taste. 
 Mary did so, and experienced a burning sensation and 
 thirst. The cook, afterwards eating it, became violently 
 sick and had to go to bed. On the 15th Pritchard 
 ordered her to make egg-fiip for the invalid. He carried 
 two lumps of sugar from the dining-room into his 
 consulting-room, and from thence to the pantry, where 
 he dropped them into the fiip. Mrs. Pritchard took a 
 little and was sick ; the cook drank the rest and suffered 
 all night from pain and vomiting. On the 17th Mrs. 
 Pritchard had a severe attack of cramp and became 
 delirious. Dr. Paterson was sent for, and advised a 
 sleeping-draught ; as Pritchard said he kept no drugs in 
 the house. Dr. Paterson wrote a prescription and departed. 
 That night Mrs. Pritchard died in her husband's arms, 
 Mary M'Leod lying on a sofa at the foot of the bed. 
 
108 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 Pritchard took his wife's body to her father's house in 
 Edinburgh, where at his request the coffin was opened in 
 presence of the relatives, that he might kiss his "dearest 
 Mary Jane " for the last time. Not Webster nor Tourneur, 
 those masters of the horrific, ever conceived a scene so 
 cynically atrocious. Meanwhile someone had written to 
 the Procurator-Fiscal, calling his attention to these strange 
 deaths ; when Pritchard was in Edinburgh his house was 
 searched and the inmates examined, and on his return he 
 was arrested at Queen Street Station for the murder of his 
 wife. On the discovery of antimony in Mrs. Pritchard's 
 body that of Mrs. Taylor was exhumed, and the presence 
 of the same poison being also in her case ascertained, 
 Pritchard was further charged with her murder. The trial 
 took place on 3rd July before the High Court ; John 
 Inglis, who had so successfully defended Madeleine Smith, 
 presided as Justice-Clerk ; the Solicitor-General (Young) 
 prosecuted, and Mr. Rutherfurd Clark conducted the de- 
 fence. The medical evidence as to the cause of death was 
 in both cases conclusive. Pritchard had certified that of 
 Mrs. Taylor as "Paralysis, 12 hours; Apoplexy, 1 hour," 
 and that of his wife as " Gastric Fever, 2 months." Mrs. 
 Pritchard's symptoms, as observed by Drs. Cowan, Gairdner 
 and Paterson, directly negatived the truth of this, while 
 other witnesses proved that Mrs. Taylor was quite well 
 until her sudden seizure. There was no sign of apoplexy. 
 The medical and chemical examinations made by Drs. 
 Maclagan, Littlejohn, and Penny established the fact that 
 both bodies contained antimony — that of Mrs. Pritchard 
 being saturated with the poison. Antimony and aconite 
 were found in the bottle of Battley, but no aconite could 
 be detected in Mrs. Taylor's body. The unused tapioca 
 was largely mixed with antimony. As regards possession 
 of poison by the prisoner, despite his statement to Dr. 
 Paterson he was proved to have been from September 1864 
 to 16th March 1865 a constant purchaser of deadly drugs: 
 strychnia, conium, laudanum, morphia, tartarised antimony, 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 109 
 
 Fleming's tincture of aconite, atropine, etc. ; the quantities 
 of antimony and aconite alone being largely in excess of 
 those supplied to other medical men and much greater than 
 could have been required in any ordinary practice. The 
 opportunities for administration were obvious, but the 
 cheese and the egg-flip were the only poisoned articles 
 traced to Pritchard's hand. The Crown case, in other 
 respects impregnable, was weakest upon the question of 
 motive. Pritchard had promised to marry M'Leod if his 
 wife died, and under Mrs. Taylor's settlement he received 
 a life-interest in a few hundred pounds. That he would in 
 any circumstances have married the servant-girl he had 
 long before seduced is incredible ; and though his bank 
 account was overdrawn, Mrs. Taylor would have lent him 
 money, as she had previously done. It would be, for him, 
 a sufficient reason for becoming a widower that he was 
 tired of his wife and saw his way to a more attractive 
 match ; as for ]\Irs. Taylor, her presence interfered with 
 his scheme, and we know from his confession that she had 
 " caught M'Leod and him in the consulting-room " ; pro- 
 bably she proved less complacent than her daughter on a 
 similar occasion. An attempt by the defence to throw the 
 guilt upon M'Leod failed, and Pritchard afterwards declared 
 her complete innocence. After a five days' trial he was 
 convicted and sentenced to death. Before his execution — 
 the last public one in Glasgow — ^he confessed his crimes, 
 which he attributed to " the use of ardent spirits " ; but 
 there is no evidence of his intemperance : he was too cold- 
 blooded and crafty for that. He retained to the last the 
 cloak of religious hypocrisy which he had worn so long. 
 " 1 shall meet you in Heaven," said he to the Rev. Dr. 
 Bonar, whom he had asked to pray with him. "' Sir," 
 retorted the divine, " we shall meet at the Judgment Seat." 
 On 23rd November 1910, in connection with the demolition 
 of the old South Jail, the courtyard, in which were buried 
 the bodies of executed criminals, was excavated, and among 
 the remains exhumed were those of Dr. Pritchard, Oppor- 
 
110 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 tunity was taken to examine the skull, a " note " on which, 
 with interesting photographs, was published by Mr. Edington 
 in 19 12. (a) 
 
 Eugene Marie Chantrelle, teacher of French and amateur 
 physician, was a villain of a ruder type than Pritchard. (Z>) 
 While employed at Newington Academy, Edinburgh, in 
 1868 he seduced one of his pupils, a girl of fifteen named 
 Elizabeth Dyer, whom her family, saving her reputation at 
 the cost of her happiness, compelled him to marry. From 
 the first Chantrelle systematically ill-treated his wife, several 
 times she fled from his cruelty to her parents' home, but 
 for the sake of her children she as often returned to her 
 tyrant. As his infidelities were frequent and notorious she 
 could readily have obtained divorce ; there again, however, 
 she sacrificed herself to her children's welfare. So for ten 
 years the unhappy woman patiently endured her cross. 
 Chantrelle's teaching connection suff'ered from his profligate 
 and drunken habits, engagements grew scarce, he was in 
 debt and pressed for money, and in October 1877 he insured 
 his wife's life for £1000 with the Accident Assurance 
 Association, having previously ascertained from another 
 office what constituted "accidental" death. This step was 
 against the lady's wish : she told her mother that she was 
 afraid of the consequences, for her husband had more than 
 once threatened to take her life ; he was half a doctor, and 
 boasted that he could poison her without detection. The 
 Chantrelles occupied the two upper flats of a common stair, 
 No. 81a George Street, Edinburgh. On New Year's Day 
 1878 Madame Chantrelle gave the servant a holiday, re- 
 mainino; herself at home with the children. On the maid's 
 return at 10 p.m. Chantrelle told her that his wife, being 
 unwell, had o;one to bed. She found her mistress in 
 the back bedroom, " very heavy looking," with the baby 
 beside her. A tumbler of lemonade stood by the bedside, 
 
 (a) Glasgow Medical Journal, February 1912. 
 
 (6) Trial of E. M. Chantrelle, edited by A. Duncan Smith, 1906. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 111 
 
 and Madame asked her to peel an orange for her, which 
 was done. Chantrelle slept in the front bedroom with the 
 tw^o older children. Next morning when the maid rose at 
 seven she heard moaning from her mistress's room, the door 
 of which was partly open and the gas unlit— both contrary 
 to custom. Entering, she saw Madame lying unconscious 
 in the bed, with stains as of vomiting upon the pillow. 
 She called her master, who was in his own bed with the 
 three children. He went with her to the back room and 
 attempted to rouse his wife ; the maid advised sending for 
 a doctor. Chantrelle said he heard the baby cryino- and 
 told her to attend to it ; she left the room, but findino- the 
 baby still asleep, at once returned, and saw Chantrelle in 
 the act of coming away from the window. " Don't you 
 smell gas ? " he asked, and though she did not then do so, 
 immediately afterwards she noticed a slight smell, so she 
 turned off the gas at the meter. Dr. Carmichael was 
 summoned ; when he arrived the room was redolent of was, 
 and Chantrelle explained that there had been an escape. 
 The doctor sent for Dr. (afterwards Sir Henry) Littlejohn, 
 City Medical Officer, " to see a case of coal-gas poisonino-/' 
 and the patient, in a comatose state, was carried into the 
 front room. Dr. Littlejohn came ; he thought she was 
 dying and advised her removal to the Royal Infirmary. 
 Both doctors, in view of the smell and of Chantrelle's false 
 statements, believed her to be suffering from gas. At the 
 Infirmary, Dr. Maclagan, into whose ward she was taken, 
 diagnosed the case as one not of gas, but of narcotic 
 poisoning, probably opium, and it was treated accordincrly. 
 At 4 P.M. the patient died without having reo-ained con- 
 sciousness. Medical and chemical examinations of the body 
 negatived the suggestion that death was due to gas poison- 
 ing, but failed to detect the narcotic poison indicated by 
 the symptoms. Fortunately for the ends of justice, in 
 certain stains of vomited matter upon the nightdress and 
 bedclothes Drs. Maclagan and Littlejohn, as well as Pro- 
 fessors Crum Brown and Eraser, established by separate 
 
112 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 analyses the presence of opium, apparently in the form of 
 extract, together with orange pulp. Chantrelle was arrested ; 
 although his judicial declaration occupied thirteen hours, 
 the only important point was his statement that he left his 
 wife in her usual health at 1 a.m. ; for the rest, the por- 
 tentous document was devoted to gross and baseless slander 
 of the dead woman. On his trial at Edinburgh in May 
 1878, for murdering his wife by opium, in orange or 
 lemonade. Lord Moncreiff presided, the Lord Advocate 
 (Watson) appeared for the Crown, and Mr. Trayner for the 
 pannel. The defence maintained that the symptoms and 
 morbid appearances were consistent with gas poisoning, and 
 that the stains were not proved to be the result of vomit- 
 ing ; and indeed, upon the medical evidence alone, the 
 Crown mif^ht not have been certain of a conviction. But 
 it was proved that behind the window shutter, from whence, 
 before there was any smell of gas, Chantrelle had been seen 
 by the maid to come, was a disused gas pipe, freshly broken 
 throuo-h by wrenching, which, had it been for any time in 
 that condition, must have filled the house with gas; and 
 that while Chantrelle denied that he knew of the pipe being 
 there, he had in 1876 been present when it was repaired, 
 and discussed its position with the workman. It was 
 further proved that on 25th November 1877 Chantrelle 
 bouo-ht from a local chemist a drachm of extract of opium, 
 as to the application of which there was no evidence, though 
 a similar purchase by him in 1872 was found in his reposi- 
 tories ; also that he had stated to various witnesses that 
 before o-oing to bed he gave his wife a bit of orange and 
 some lemonade, and took the baby away as she was feeling 
 unw^ell. The jury unanimously found him guilty, and the 
 prisoner, in a rambling statement from the dock, demolished 
 the whole fabric of the defence by arguing that his wife 
 had taken opium voluntarily, and that someone had rubbed 
 the poison on her linen in order to incriminate him. He 
 was condemned to death, and notwithstanding strong efforts 
 made to obtain a reprieve, sentence was duly carried out, 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 113 
 
 the convict refusing to confess his guilt. Had Chantrelle 
 been content simply to turn on the gas that night in his 
 wife's room it is probable that, so far as her case is concerned, 
 he might have "cheated the woodie"; but it was under- 
 stood at the time that in the event of an acquittal the Crown 
 was prepared to indict him upon another capital charge. 
 
 After M. Chantrelle's enforced retirement from practice 
 the art of poisoning in Scotland sensibly declined. Since 
 his suspension no other artist of the same school has been, 
 if I may pursue the metaphor, hung on the line ; the 
 present generation furnishes but few performers, whose 
 work, in quantity inconsiderable, lacks the boldness of 
 design and finish of execution which distinguish that of 
 the older masters. 
 
 An unsatisfactory case was that of John Webster, 
 landlord of Newton Hotel, Kirriemuir, tried at Edinburgh 
 in February 1891, for the murder of his wife by arsenic.(a) 
 In the beo-innino; of Auo;ust Mrs. Webster had been 
 suddenly attacked with vomiting and persistent thirst, and 
 died after three days' illness, attended by her husband. A 
 doctor, called in, thought her suffering from gastritis, and 
 certified accordingly. Four months after interment the 
 body was exhumed ; it was unusually well preserved, there 
 were no signs of natural death, and on analysis arsenic was 
 found in all the organs examined. At the trial expert 
 evidence to that effect was given by Dr. Littlejohn, Mr. 
 Falconer King, and Professor Crum Brown ; death was due 
 to arsenic, administered in repeated doses. An error in 
 the chemical report as to the amount probably contained 
 in the body was corrected by the medical witnesses from 
 subsequent experiments. When the diet was first called 
 the Lord Advocate asked for a postponement, owing to 
 the disappearance of his principal witness, James Peacock, 
 barman at the hotel. Before the second trial Peacock was 
 discovered drowned in a reservoir, so his testimony was lost 
 
 (a) Scotsman, 18th, 19th, and 20t]i February, 1891. 
 
114 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 to the Crown. It was proved that the couple had been on 
 bad terms, and that Webster had insured his wife's life 
 for £1000. The bed linen used by the deceased had been 
 partially washed before being sent to the laundry. No 
 arsenic could be traced to the prisoner's possession, nor 
 any attempt on his part to procure it. The defence con- 
 tended that the presence of arsenic in Mrs. Webster's body 
 was due to her having taken Fowler's Solution ; she had 
 consulted in June an unknown medical man, who gave 
 her medicine which "might have been Fowler" — a likely 
 prescription for the ailment she admittedly had ; but, on 
 the other hand, it was not proved that she ever took any, 
 and none was found in the house. Taylor, by the way, 
 states that there is only one recorded case (1848) in which 
 Fowler's solution has destroyed life.(a) After a three days' 
 trial the jury returned a verdict of not guilty, and the 
 prisoner was discharged. 
 
 On 19th November 1906 Mr. William Lennox, Old 
 Cumnock, Ayrshire, received by post an anonymous gift 
 of shortbread, roughly covered with icing, in a parcel 
 containing a card inscribed, " With happy greetings from 
 an old friend." Four persons in the house who tasted the 
 shortbread became seriously ill, with symptoms of strych- 
 nine poisoning ; one, the housekeeper. Miss M'Kerrow, died 
 next day. Strychnine was ascertained to be the cause of 
 death, and enough of that poison to kill several people was 
 found in the icing. Thomas Mathieson Brown, whose wife 
 was a niece of Mr. Lennox, was arrested in connection with 
 the crime. (6) At the pleading diet, the Procurator- Fiscal 
 produced two medical certificates that the accused was of 
 unsound mind and incapable of pleading to the indictment. 
 It was insisted for the prisoner that he should be allowed 
 to plead not guilty ; and the Sheriff reserved the matter 
 for the consideration of the High Court. At the second 
 diet on 18th March 1907, the Solicitor-General left it to 
 
 (a) Medical Jihrisprudence, 1910, ii. 472. 
 {h) Adam's Justiciary Reports, v. .312. 
 
LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 115 
 
 the Court to order an investigation as to tlie prisoner's 
 mental condition. The defence objected, and moved that 
 he should be discharged, as he had not been called upon 
 to plead at the first diet. The Court repelled the motion, 
 and found that it was inexpedient to hold a preliminary- 
 enquiry into the panncl's state of mind. He then pleaded 
 not guilty, and the trial proceeded. Evidence was led to 
 prove that the pannel had bought an ounce of strychnine 
 from a Glasgow chemist, and that the card and the address 
 on the parcel were in his handwriting. Expert testimony 
 was given to the eifect that he had suffered for years from 
 chronic epileptic insanity. The Lord Justice-General 
 (Dunedin) directed the jury to answer the following 
 questions: — (l) Is the prisoner now insane? if not, (2) 
 Did he send the poisoned cake ? and if so, (3) Was he 
 insane at the time? The jury, by a majority, found the 
 pannel to be then insane ; he was accordingly ordered to 
 be detained during His Majesty's pleasure. Thus the 
 question of his guilt or innocence remained undecided. 
 
 A remarkable case which, owing to the self-effacement 
 of the criminal, was never brought to trial occurred at 
 Dalkeith, Mid-Lothian, in 19 11. (a) On 3rd February of 
 that year Mr. and Mrs. Hutchison, Bridgend, on the 
 occasion of their silver wedding, entertained a party of 
 friends at a whist drive. After supper coffee was brought 
 in by John Hutchison, the son of the house. Of the 
 eighteen persons present he and three of the guests took 
 none, the other fourteen, including John's fiancee, drank 
 the coffee, were immediately seized with violent sickness, 
 and quickly became prostrate. Medical aid was summoned, 
 and after treatment all but two — Mr. Hutchison and Mr. 
 Clapperton — recovered. Arsenic was ascertained to be the 
 cause of death, and that poison was traced in the remains 
 of the coffee as served. John Hutchison, who had been 
 prompt in administering an emetic to the sufferers, attended 
 
 (a) Dalkeith Advertiser, 9th, 16th, 23rd February ; 2nd March 1911. 
 
116 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 the funeral of the victims. He was formerly assistant to 
 his uncle, a chemist in Musselburgh, but though only twenty- 
 four had retired, as appeared, upon his winnings on the 
 Stock Exchange, and his motor car was a feature of the 
 district. On the 14th Hutchison left Dalkeith, ostensibly 
 to visit friends in Newcastle. Meantime the authorities 
 discovered that a bottle containing arsenic was missing 
 from the chemist's shop where he had been recently em- 
 ployed ; there were other suspicious circumstances, and a 
 fortnight after the tragedy a warrant was issued for his 
 arrest. Descriptions and photographs of the wanted man 
 were published broadcast ; he was tracked to London and 
 from thence to Guernsey, where on the 20th he was dis- 
 covered in a boarding-house under an assumed name. 
 Questioned by a police-sergeant, he denied his identity 
 and ran upstairs to his bedroom, pursued by the ofticer. 
 Before the latter could close with him he swallowed the 
 contents of a small phial which he had about him, and fell 
 dead on the spot. An inquest was held, when it was found 
 that death was due to prussic acid. Hutchison, so far 
 from being a man of means, was heavily in debt, and 
 had given way to drink ; if there was any financial 
 motive for the commission of the crime it was not dis- 
 closed, nor was any evidence as to his mental condition 
 made public. 
 
 The next crime to be considered was admittedly the 
 work of a mind deranged. William Watson and his wife 
 were charged at Glasgow in October 1912 with conspiring 
 to murder their children, and with murdering two of them, 
 by cyanide of potassium. (a) The wife pleaded insanity in 
 bar of trial, and upon expert evidence by Drs. Devon and 
 Parker she was ordered to be detained during His JMajesty's 
 pleasure. In the husband's case it was proved that he, 
 being a photographer, had obtained four ounces of cyanide, 
 which his wife had persuaded the children to take. After 
 
 (a) Official Sliorihaud Writers' Notes. 
 
LOCUST A IN SCOTLAND 117 
 
 medical evidence that Watson had long suffered from fixed 
 delusions by which his mind was still affected, the judge 
 (Lord Johnston) stopped the case, directing the jury to 
 say whether or not upon the evidence the prisoner was of 
 sound mind ; they found that he was insane, and he was 
 ordered to be confined accordingly. 
 
 The latest — it were sanguine to suppose the last — 
 poisoning case tried in Scotland is that of John Saunders, 
 gamekeeper, Gosford, Haddingtonshire, at Edinburgh in 
 April 1913, for attempting to poison his wife. (a) It 
 appeared from the evidence that Mrs. Saunders, who had 
 long been in a neurotic condition, began to complain of her 
 food having a strange taste, and displayed after eating 
 symptoms suggestive of poisoning. She was attended by 
 Drs. Gamble and Millar, who treated the case as one of 
 hysteria. To the nurse and others Mrs. Saunders indicated 
 certain articles of food and drink which she said had made 
 her sick, and these were secured for examination. On 
 analyses by Professor Harvey Littlejohn of marmalade, 
 cream, and biscuit, the presence of strychnine was detected 
 — the total quantity recovered being '323 of a grain. 
 There was no proof of administering or tampering with 
 food by the prisoner, or of his ever having had strychnine 
 in his possession, nor was any motive for the crime alleged. 
 For the defence, Drs. Martine and GuUand testified that 
 Mrs. Saunders suffered from hypochondria, and Sir Thomas 
 Clouston stated that an hysterical woman would do any- 
 thing to excite sympathy — the theory of the defence being 
 that the symptoms were simulated, and the poison intro- 
 duced by Mrs. Saunders herself. The prisoner, who bore 
 the highest character, gave evidence in his own behalf ; he 
 had patiently endured for many years his wife's peculiar 
 humours, and had never given or sought to give her poison. 
 The jury, by a unanimous verdict of not guilty, acquitted 
 him of the chargre. 
 
 (a) Haddingtonshire Courier, 25th April 1913. 
 
118 LOCUSTA IN SCOTLAND 
 
 So much for the past ; with regard to the future a recent 
 authority, in an entertaining chapter entitled " Comfortable 
 Words about Poisoning," remarks : — " Everything goes to 
 show that the poisoner of the future will not be a very 
 dreadful person — at any rate, will not be a more dreadful 
 person than the poisoner of the present, unless we credit 
 in the future all the scientific acumen to the villain, and 
 none to those engaged upon the side of justice. For this 
 one dilemma will always remain to the poisoner. If he is 
 ignorant entirely, sheer ignorance will hang him ; while, by 
 as much as he knows anything, by so much will he be a 
 marked man, upon whom suspicion will fall. "(a) 
 
 In concluding this rapid review of four centuries of 
 Scottish poisoning as recorded by various authorities, I am 
 fully conscious of the injustice done to the more important 
 and interesting cases by the compression which my scheme 
 entails ; yet I venture to hope that such a survey, bringing 
 together by name, date, and salient features the principal 
 trials of the period covered, may, despite its obvious dis- 
 advantages, subserve some useful end, 
 
 (a) Physic and Fiction. By S. Squire Sprigge, London, 1921, p. 285. 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 
 
 " It happens, unfortunately, that great crimes, leading to the discussion which 
 they must necessarily do, are often followed by the committal of the same offence 
 on the part of others ; and you will see how that comes out in a remarkable manner 
 in this case." 
 
 — Charge of the Lord Justice-Clerk. 
 
 "jl/TENTION of the year 1857 reminds the general reader 
 -^ -^ — that well-informed person — of the dark chapter in 
 British history known as the Indian Mutiny. For the 
 limited class versed in Scots criminal annals its association is 
 with that most attaching of our causes celebres, the trial of 
 Madeleine Smith. But even as the tale of the great revolt 
 surpassed in public interest at the time many events other- 
 wise sufficiently notable, so was the lustre of certain contem- 
 poraneous malefactors quenched in the exceeding Ijrightness 
 of the young lady of Blythswood Square. Between that 
 brilliant damsel and the "hero" of the judicial drama which 
 it is here proposed briefly to recall there would seem at first 
 sight to be nothing in common, except their respective 
 occupancy of the dock upon a charge of murder ; yet the 
 baleful influence of her example upon the fate of the obscure 
 country tailor is a curious and suggestive fact. 
 
 Apart, however, from any borrowed liglit, the Eaglesham 
 poisoning case is noteworthy as being the first trial in 
 Scotland for murder by hydrocyanic or prussic acid, only 
 two other cases of the criminous employment of that drug 
 having previously occurred in England. The first of these 
 was the trial of John Donellan on 30th March 1781 at 
 Warwick Assizes, before Mr. Justice Buller, for the murder 
 of his wife's brother, Sir Theodosius Boughton, at Lawford 
 Hall, Warwickshire ; the second that of John Tawell on 
 12th March 1845 at Aylesbury Assizes, before Mr Baron 
 Parke (Lord Wensleydale), for the murder of Sarah Hart 
 at Sal thill, Slough, near Windsor. 
 
 121 
 
122 POISON AND PLAGIAEY 
 
 Donellan, a cashiered army captain who had married 
 money and, in the popular phrase, hung up his hat, was con- 
 victed of administering to his brother-in-law, a dissipated 
 young baronet of twenty, in the medicine which the lad was 
 taking for a specific ailment precociously contracted at Eton, 
 a distillation of cherry-laurel leaves, commonly called laurel 
 water, the alleged motive being that by his death his sister, 
 Mrs. Donellan, would benefit to the tune of £2000 a year. 
 The verdict has been disputed. The evidence was purely 
 circumstantial ; the scientific testimony, as usual in those 
 days, was regrettably vague, and the sole proof of the 
 presence of any laurel water in the case at all was the 
 statement of Lady Boughton that her son's medicine smelt 
 like bitter almonds. Four physicians testified to their belief 
 that Sir Theodosius died from the efi'ects of poison, but, 
 for the defence, the celebrated Dr. John Hunter maintained 
 that no such inference could be drawn from the symptoms 
 and post-mortem appearances ; he attributed the death to 
 natural causes, (a) 
 
 Tawell, a benevolent and godly member of the Society 
 of Friends, famed for his acts of charity, was convicted 
 of poisoning with prussic acid, in a bottle of Guinness's 
 stout, his devoted and unselfish mistress, to rid himself of 
 the expense of a small quarterly allowance made to her, he 
 being a married man in easy circumstances. His case, as 
 we shall see, is in certain respects interesting with reference 
 to that which we are about to consider.(6) 
 
 In the village of Eaglesham, in the shire of Renfrew, 
 some nine miles from Glasgow, there stood at the date in 
 question a two-storey tenement, access to which was had 
 by a close or entry common to the whole building. Upon 
 the ground floor were two one-room houses, separated by 
 the close which ran through the tenement to a garden behind, 
 
 (a) The Trial of John Donellan, Esq. Taken in shorthand by Joseph Gurney, 
 London, 1781. 
 
 (b) Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning. By La thorn Browne and 
 Stewart, London, 1883. 
 
Q 
 
 
 W 
 
 
 r/; 
 
 
 -< 
 
 
 W 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 w 
 
 
 p 
 
 
 w 
 
 
 K 
 
 
 H 
 
 
 >^ 
 
 
 P3 
 
 
 P 
 
 
 W 
 
 
 H-l 
 
 
 Pi 
 
 
 ;^ 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 o 
 
 r/J 
 
 
 C« 
 
 w 
 
 W 
 
 
 
 r=!5 
 
 Ml 
 
 <J 
 
 H 
 
 w 
 
 O 
 
 rr 
 
 
 w 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 >^ 
 
 <1 
 
 OS 
 
 W 
 
 
 
 K^ 
 
 fa 
 
 o 
 
 O 
 
 ^K, 
 
 
 H 
 
 w 
 
 :^; 
 
 o 
 
 n 
 
 < 
 
 ^H 
 
 
 (^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^; 
 
 w 
 
 o 
 
 K 
 
 <i 
 
 H 
 
 
 !^ 
 
 
 '—1 
 
 
 W 
 
 
 r/; 
 
 
 D 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 ffi 
 
 
 o s-l 
 
 o ^ 
 
 IX. 
 
POISON AND PLAGIAEY 123 
 
 and respectively occupied by James Watson, tailor, and 
 Hugh Montgomery, carrier. The upper floor, reached 
 from the close by a turnpike stair, consisted of three 
 adjoining rooms, in which were accommodated a like number 
 of tenants, namely, David Clarkson, mole-catcher, James 
 Macdonald, joiner, and Agnes Montgomery, employed as a 
 " reeler " in the local cotton-mills. Her room was the 
 middle one above the close. Agnes, the sister of Mrs. 
 Watson and niece of the carrier, was, according to the 
 evidence, a hale young woman of twenty-seven, respectable, 
 of a happy disposition, and powerful physique. She main- 
 tained herself on her earnings at the mill, supplemented 
 by a monthly allowance of £2 from a sailor brother. Since 
 June 1857 there had lived with the Watsons as a journey- 
 man tailor a man calling himself John Thomson, aged 
 twenty-six, a native of Tarberb, Argyllshire. Eaglesham 
 would have been surprised to learn that the stranger within 
 its gates was in fact, as afterwards appeared, one Peter 
 Walker, an ex-convict, sentenced in 1853 to seven years' 
 transportation for stealing £22 from his employer. Adding 
 insult to injury, he had applied the proceeds of the theft 
 to winning the young affections of his master's daughter. 
 When he returned to Scotland on ticket-of-leave Peter 
 Walker, modestly sinking his identity in an alias, was 
 known to his new associates as Jack Thomson. He admired 
 Agnes Montgomery and had offered her marriage, but the 
 girl, who described him to her relatives as a liar and a 
 blackguard, declined his proposals. In the preceding 
 August she and a friend, Janet Dollar, had in a double 
 sense thrown cold water on his suit, with reference to which 
 attention he said he would be damned but he would be "up 
 to them " for that. The acquaintance temporarily ceased, but 
 later Jack and Agnes appeared to be on friendly terms, 
 and it was his occasional habit to visit her of a Sunday 
 afternoon. 
 
 On Sunday, 13th September 1857, Agnes Montgomery 
 was in her usual good health and spirits. She went to 
 
124 POISON AND PLAGIAKY 
 
 church twice, forenoon and afternoon, with her friend Miss 
 Dollar, returning to her own room at the close of the 
 second service, shortly after four o'clock. Having broken 
 coals in order to kindle her fire in view of the approaching 
 tea hour, Agnes went downstairs to the entry, where she 
 stood gossiping for half an hour, first with her sister, Mrs. 
 Watson, and afterwards with a friend named William Young. 
 It was her habit, on leaving her room, to lock her door and 
 take the key with her. About ten minutes to five Thomson, 
 who had been having his tea with the family of his employer, 
 left Watson's house, and passing Agnes and Young in the 
 entry, went up the turnpike stair to the flat above. Agnes 
 then went upstairs after him, and Young turned into 
 Watson's, Janet, Mrs. Watson's three-year-old child, was 
 not then " in " — she was playing about the stair. At five 
 o'clock Miss Dollar, who lived hard by, sent two little girls, 
 aged nine and eight, with an invitation to Agnes to go for 
 a walk with her. The children gave the message, and 
 Agnes replied that she would go. They saw that Jack 
 Thomson and little Janet were then in her room and that 
 the fire was burning brightly. Agnes asked the girls to 
 bring her a bottle of beer from Dollar's — the father of her 
 friend had a licence ; this they duly did, and delivered it 
 unopened to Agnes. Jack and the child were still with 
 her when they left the beer. 
 
 Agnes Montgomery's next-door neighbours were, as it 
 chanced, at home that afternoon — Clarkson, in his room on 
 the west of hers, and Mrs. Law (who lived with her son 
 Macdonald) in that on the east. The doors of both were 
 open. About ten minutes past five Mrs. Law heard a heavy 
 fall in Agnes's room, followed by " a sort of rumbling — feet 
 rustling along the floor." In a minute or two she heard 
 someone leave the room, lock the door, take out the key, 
 and go softly downstairs. She attached no importance to 
 the matter at the time, thinking that the person was Agnes 
 herself. Clarkson, sitting by his fireside, commanded across 
 the landing a view of Agnes's door. About ten minutes to 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 125 
 
 five he saw her enter her house, accompanied by Thomson 
 and the child Janet. She opened the door with her key, 
 and they all went in together. He next saw the two girls 
 call, and return later with the beer. A quarter of an hour 
 after they left he heard "a great rumble and a desperate 
 thrash on the floor," which, mentally deprecating such 
 conduct on the Sabbath day, he attributed to some horse- 
 play on the part of the visitor. It is noteworthy that no 
 cry or scream was heard either by Mrs. Law or by Clarkson. 
 In four or five minutes he saw Thomson come out with the 
 little girl, lock the door on the outside, and go downstairs. 
 Almost immediately Thomson returned alone and stood 
 listening for a moment at the locked door with his ear 
 against it, after which he went again downstairs. Clarkson 
 himself soon after went down for water from the well in the 
 garden, and on coming back a few minutes later heard a great 
 moaning, which he thought was made by Mrs. Montgomery, 
 who was lying ill in the room below. 
 
 Mrs. Macdonald also had been at the well, and returning 
 to the house, met Jack and little Janet in the garden, near 
 a rosebush. He remarked that it was a fine day and that 
 he was goino; to give the child some flowers. She thought 
 his face looked white. Mrs. Watson met her in the entry ; 
 their attention was attracted by the strange moaning, and 
 the two women went up together. On reaching the landing 
 they found that " the moans were from Aggie's." Her door 
 was locked, and their cries and knockings elicited no response 
 from within. Mrs. Law and Clarkson, alarmed by the noise, 
 had joined them, and it was decided to force the door, but 
 someone thought of trying Clarkson's key ; it opened the 
 lock and they all rushed into the room. Mrs. Watson on 
 entering noticed a peculiar smell like bitter almonds, which 
 aff'ected her throat and nostrils. She thus describes the 
 scene : " Aggie was sitting on a chair before the clock, her 
 head leaning to the right on the table, her right hand hang- 
 ing down, the left in her lap. A thick slaver was coming 
 from her mouth, and her eyes were staring. She was alone." 
 
126 POISON AND PLAGIAEY 
 
 Seeing in this dreadful state the poor girl whom half an 
 hour before she had left in perfect health, her horrified 
 sister, attempting to rouse her, cried, " Aggie, Aggie ! what's 
 this ? Have ye been taking anything ? " But Aggie was 
 to speak no more in this world. It is obvious that the 
 idea of natural illness was in the circumstances out of the 
 question and occurred to no one. The fire was burning 
 brightly, the room was in perfect order, nothing was visible 
 which could account for her condition ; but the key of the 
 door was missing. 
 
 Meanwhile, at twenty minutes past five, two friends of 
 Thomson, named Fulton and Muir, called for him at 
 Watson's house. Watson said he was "either in Aggie's 
 or down the green." They accordingly went upstairs, found 
 her door fast, heard the groans, and then went down to 
 the garden, where they met Jack, to whom they mentioned 
 the strange sounds in the locked room. He gave " a bit 
 smile" but made no comment. They were joined at the 
 instant by Mrs. Macdonald, who said Aggie was very ill 
 and someone must so for the doctor. Thomson volunteered 
 to do so. He ran across the public green to Dr. Scott's 
 house, some 200 yards distant, asked the doctor to come 
 at once, and, running back across the common, was seen by 
 two separate persons to stop at a certain tree, stoop down 
 to the ground for a moment, and then run on again. On 
 his return he remarked to others in the room that he had 
 felt so faint coming back he had to lean against a tree. 
 Dr. Scott reached the house at half-past five. He thought 
 the case one of apoplexy, and attempted bleeding but 
 without success. By his directions the patient was put to 
 bed, Jack willingly taking off his coat to help. Toddy was 
 exhibited to no efi'ect, and the doctor left, the case being, 
 in his opinion, hopeless. By six o'clock Agnes Montgomery 
 was dead ; the duration of the illness, so far as could be 
 ascertained, being under fifty minutes. Dr. Scott duly 
 certified the cause of death as apoplexy. 
 
 At the "coffining" next day Thomson, who was present. 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 127 
 
 said it was a serious call that Aggie had got, and he 
 was very sorry — he never saw a girl he thought more 
 of. Her sister, Mrs. Young, remarked, "You would be 
 the last person that saw her alive [i.e. conscious]?" to 
 which he replied, " I believe I was," adding that, when he 
 left her, she was breaking sticks to light her fire. He also 
 told his friend Fulton that he had been with her for a 
 quarter of an hour, but noticed nothing wrong. Whether 
 or not the sudden fate of Agnes Montgomery aroused at 
 the time among her friends a suspicion of foul play does 
 not appear ; as simple country folk, to whom the idea that 
 she had been deliberately done to death would hardly 
 occur, it is improbable that they presumed to question the 
 accuracy of Dr. Scott's certificate. So with the burial of 
 the dead girl on Thursday, 17th September, the village 
 tragedy was to all appearance played out. 
 
 A week later, Friday the 25th, Jack Thomson left 
 Eaglesham. The order of his going, though irregular, was 
 unconnected with the recent sensation. A letter containing 
 money had disappeared ; Watson suspected Jack of stealing 
 it, and advised him to go away. He did not propose to 
 prosecute, but refused any longer to employ him. Three 
 days before her death Agnes told her sister Mrs. Young 
 that Watson had missed money and would get his eyes 
 opened as to Jack yet. She stated to Janet Dollar that 
 she blamed him for taking money out of her sailor brother's 
 pocket, and her last word to her sister Mrs. Watson had 
 reference to a missing loaf, which was found hidden in his 
 bed. That he had not changed his nature with his name is 
 evident ; John Thomson's views of the distinction between 
 meum and tuum were as imperfectly developed as those of 
 Peter Walker. 
 
 At seven o'clock that night he set out to walk to 
 Glasgow. On the road he called at a spirit dealer's in 
 Clarkston and bought a pint bottle of whisky, which he 
 took away with him. Prior to his Eaglesham period 
 Thomson had lodged with a respectable couple named 
 
128 POISON AND PLAGIAKY 
 
 Mason, who lived in John Street, Glasgow, and at their 
 house he now presented himself half an hour before mid- 
 night. Mason was in bed. The visitor explained that he 
 had come back to occupy his former lodging, and to cele- 
 brate the occasion he poured out from his bottle a glass 
 of whisky, which he offered to his landlord. Mason barely 
 tasted it — the stuff was bitter, sourish, and he felt his face 
 instantly flush ; fortunately he declined to drain the cup. 
 The visitor, remarking that it was the best Paisley whisky, 
 then filled a glass for Mrs. Mason, who, having swallowed 
 a third of it, felt a bitter taste, presently became giddy- 
 saw double, and lost the power of her limbs. " Oh, John, 
 that's not good whisky ! " cried she ; but Thomson repeated 
 his assurance that it was the best Paisley produced. She 
 continued very ill for several days but ultimately recovered. 
 Thomson on his previous visit had appropriated some clothes 
 belonging to a fellow-lodger, and next morning Mason left 
 the house to communicate to the police the fact of the 
 prodigal's return. During her husband's absence the visitor 
 went up to inquire for Mrs. Mason, and pressed her to take 
 another glass of the Paisley blend. She refused, telling 
 him how ill she had been in the night ; whereupon he 
 observed that he himself drank what she had left and was 
 none the worse for it. The conversation was interrupted 
 by the arrival of the police and the removal of Mr. Thomson 
 to prison. He was, however, set at liberty on Tuesday the 
 29th, in what circumstances we do not know. 
 
 On that date, four days after Jack's departure from 
 Eaglesham, little Janet, playing on the floor at her 
 mother's feet, said something about Aggie's death which 
 applied the spark to Mrs. Watson's slumbering suspicions. 
 She questioned the child, and as the result of her answers 
 Mrs. Watson, having conferred with the neighbours, set out 
 next day for Glasgow. The Court of Justiciary, then upon 
 the Autumn Circuit, was sitting in that town. Mrs. Watson 
 went to the Court house and informed a detective officer 
 that she believed John Thomson had murdered her sister. 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 129 
 
 By a curious chance the very man of whom she spoke was 
 then in Court, having, as appears, a liking for the law ; she 
 pointed him out to the officer, who arrested him on the spot. 
 On 1st October the prisoner w^as brought before the 
 Sheriff- Substitute and emitted a declaration in regard to 
 the charge of murder. In this, inter alia, the accuse<l 
 declared that he did not enter Agnes Montgomery's house 
 on the day of her death, and that he never employed any 
 person to buy prussic acid. In the course of their inquiry 
 into the case the authorities lighted upon the curious 
 incident which took place at Mason's house on the night of 
 the prisoner's arrival from Eaglesham, as the result of 
 which, on 21st October, he again appeared before the 
 Sheriii'- Substitute and emitted a second declaration with 
 reference to the further charges of attempting to poison 
 Mr. and Mrs. Mason. Upon this examination he declared : 
 " I bought no whisky on said night, either in Eaglesham 
 or on my way from it to Mason's house ; and I had no 
 whisky with me when I went to Mason's house. I did not 
 give or offer any whisky to Mason or his w4fe." He re- 
 peated that on no occasion had he ever sent any person to 
 buy ]n-ussic acid, adding, " I don't know what it is." How the 
 facts stand with regard to the truth of these declarations we 
 shall see when we come to the evidence led at the trial. 
 
 The case against him being duly completed, on 22nd 
 December 1857 John Thomson, alias Peter Walker, was 
 placed at the bar of the Circuit Court of Justiciary at 
 Glasgow to answer the charges brought against him. (a) 
 The judge was the Lord Justice-Clerk, John Hope, who in 
 the preceding July had presided at the trial of Madeleine 
 Smith. There appeared for the Crown Messrs. F. L. 
 Maitland Heriot and Andrew Rutherfurd Clark, Advocates- 
 Depute, the pannel being represented by no less than four 
 counsel, namely, Messrs. Alexander Moncrieff, William 
 
 (a.) Repwt of the Trial of John Thotnson alias Peter Walker. By Hugh Cowan, 
 Advocate, Edinburgli, 1858 ; Irvine's .Justiciary Report.*, ii. 747 ; Lancet, 2nd 
 January 1858. 
 
130 POISON AND PLAGIAEY 
 
 E. Gloag, A. Dunn Pattison, and James Mure, Advocates. 
 Though taking no prominent part in this case, Mr. Ruther- 
 furd Clark was five years hater to distinguish himself by 
 his defence of Mrs. M'Lachlan on her trial for murder in 
 the same Court; he also in 1865 defended Dr. Pritchard in 
 similar circumstances, when even his ability could not avail 
 to save that villainous physician's life. Among the counsel 
 for the defence will be noticed the name of the future Lord 
 Kincairney. Moncrieff was junior counsel for Madeleine 
 Smith. 
 
 The indictment is peculiar in respect that the pannel 
 was charged with the two distinct crimes of murder and 
 of attempt to poison, not, as in the case of Miss Smith, 
 committed against the same person, nor, as in that of 
 Katharine Nairn, where the separate acts set forth, in the 
 words of Hume, " have a natural relation and dependence as 
 parts of one foul and nefarious story. "(a) Counsel for the 
 pannel, however, neither objected to the indictment nor 
 moved for separation of the charges, though had he done 
 so, as appears from an observation of the Justice-Clerk, his 
 Lordship would have sustained the objection, and proceeded 
 with the first charge alone. The charges were (l) on 13th 
 September 1857 administering to Agnes Montgomery in 
 beer a quantity of prussic acid, in consequence whereof 
 she died and was thus murdered by him ; (2) on 25th or 
 26th of that month administering to Agnes Stenhouse or 
 Mason in whisky a quantity of prussic acid with intent to 
 murder her or do her grievous bodily harm, whereby she 
 suffered severe illness and was put in danger of her life ; 
 and (3) administering on that date the same poison to 
 Archibald Mason with similar intent, whereby he was in- 
 juriously affected in his health and person. The last two 
 charges were laid alternatively at common law or under the 
 statute 10 Geo. IV. cap. 38. Annexed to the indictment 
 was an inventory of fifty productions, and a list of ninety- 
 one witnesses for the Crown. The diet having been called 
 
 (a) Commentaries on the Law of Scotland respecting Crimes, 1819, ii. 166. 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 131 
 
 and no objection stated, the Lord Justice-Clerk found the 
 libel relevant ; the pannel pleaded not guilty, a jury was 
 empannelled, and the trial proceeded. 
 
 The first witness of importance for the prosecution was 
 Mrs. Watson, who spoke to the circumstances of Af^nes 
 Montgomery's death as already mentioned. She described 
 in great detail the symptoms exhibited by the dying oirl — 
 insensibility, foaming at the mouth, clenching of the teeth 
 and hands, the eyes fixed and staring, the face red and 
 swelled "like to burst." She asked the doctor if he 
 thought Agnes had taken anything ; he said he didn't 
 know, and seemed unable to judge. She entered the room 
 at twenty-five minutes past five, and death occurred about 
 thirty-five minutes later. On Saturday the 12th, Thomson 
 asked her for pen and ink. He wrote a note which he 
 gave to the carrier's boy, who, she understood, was to brino- 
 him something from Glasgow, as she had seen him do 
 before. After Aggie's death no money, except twopence, 
 was found in her room. She identified a key produced as 
 that of the dead girl's door ; she knew it well, 
 
 James Watson, her husband, spoke to seeing the pannel 
 and little Janet in the garden at twenty minutes past five. 
 After Thomson had left the garden Watson noticed upon 
 the walk between the house and the well fragments of 
 broken glass, apparently crushed into the gravel by a foot, 
 the mark of which was visible. The glass was thin, that 
 of a small phial. He showed it to Mrs. Clarkson, who was 
 with him, and then threw it away. He remembered on 
 13th or 14th July last his wife reading aloud from a 
 newspaper report of Madeleine Smith's current trial the 
 evidence of that young lady's unsuccessful attempt to 
 purchase prussic acid. Thomson was present at the time 
 and seemed much interested by the incident. (a) With 
 
 (rt) It will be within the reader's recollection that prior to her repeated 
 acquisition of arsenic Madeleine had sent her father's page boy to a neighbouring 
 chemist with a. "line" asking him to give bearer half an ounce of prussic acid, 
 which the chemist wisely declined to do. 
 
132 POISON AND PLAGIARY 
 
 reference to this passage, Thomson inquired what kind 
 of stuff prussic acid was ; whereupon Watson replied that 
 if Miss Smith had given it to L'Angelier, he could not 
 have left her company alive. Apparently struck by the 
 rapidity with which the poison was said to act, Thomson 
 remarked that it was surely strong stuff, and asked where 
 it could be bought ; Watson answered, in an apothecary's, 
 but no one except " likeness- takers " could get it. 
 
 From the evidence of other witnesses it appears that 
 the academic interest in prussic acid aroused by this con- 
 versation stimulated Thomson to further inquiry touching 
 the properties and effects of the drug. Within a week, 
 19th July, he called upon Watson's brother, a photo- 
 grapher in Portugal Street, Glasgow, and broached the 
 subject of Madeleine Smith buying prussic acid. The 
 "likeness-taker" remarked that it was a very active poison, 
 and as such would not have answered her amiable purpose 
 — L'Angelier, had he taken it, would have dropped down 
 dead at her feet. A painter named Arneil, who took part 
 in this conversation, observed that prussic acid would have 
 suited Miss Smith better than arsenic, as it was not so 
 easily discovered ; on the other hand, it was more difficult 
 to obtain. Watson said both could be got with equal 
 facility, being sold as medicine by all druggists — by Mr. 
 Hart, for instance, a Glasgow chemist. Thomson listened 
 attentively, turning from one speaker to the other, and 
 putting in a word occasionally. The question of the 
 quantity required by Miss Smith arose, a newspaper was 
 sent for, and they found she had proposed to purchase 
 sixpence- worth. Mr. Thomson terminated the discussion 
 by expressing his strong opinion that Madeleine Smith 
 should be hanged, which, in view of the benefit he derived 
 from her experience, was not only ungallant but savoured 
 of ingratitude. 
 
 Mrs. Macdonald corroborated Mrs. Watson as to the 
 discovery and appearance of the dying girl. On entering 
 the room she noticed a sickening kind of smell which 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 133 
 
 afFected her nostrils and throat. She described it as 
 " blowing-like " from Agnes. On 5th November, in 
 presence of the superintendent of police and the Crown 
 doctors, some beer mixed with priissic acid was spilt in 
 her presence, when Mrs. Macdonald at once recognised the 
 smell, "as sickening, though stronger." Mrs. Young stated 
 that while attending Agnes during the illness she found 
 below the dresser in the room a bottle, containing about 
 two gills of beer, which she emptied out, as the bottle 
 was required for hot water for the patient. An un- 
 washed tumbler was found in the press by another witness. 
 The grass at the foot of the tree on the common at which 
 the prisoner, returning from the doctor, was seen to stoop, 
 disclosed on research by the police and others a key, later 
 identified as that of Agnes Montgomery's door. With the 
 evidence of the neighbours concerning what they saw and 
 heard on that fateful afternoon, and of the parties to the 
 conversations regarding Madeleine Smith, the first day's 
 proceedings closed. 
 
 When the Court met again on 23rd December the 
 Advocate-Depute proposed to examine the little girl Janet 
 Watson. The child alone could tell what happened in the 
 room between the pannel and the deceased ; she was barely 
 more than three years old, but he submitted it was for the 
 jury to judge of the value of her evidence after seeing and 
 hearing her in the box. The fact to which she would speak 
 was one eminently within the comprehension of the child. 
 A heavy fall was heard by others in the adjoining rooms, 
 the child was proved to have been in the room with two 
 persons whom she knew, and the question he proposed to 
 ask was. Who fell? The Lord Justice-Clerk said that he 
 was unable to admit her statement, this being a case of life 
 and death. Its admission was a matter of discretion in 
 the Court. if the child Jiad made the statement at the 
 time, it would have been in a different position, but sixteen 
 days elapsed before she spoke. Somethino- might have 
 been suggested to her in the interval, and she was too 
 
134 POISON AND PLAGIARY 
 
 young to explain why she had not spoken sooner. The 
 Advocate-Depute then proposed to ask the mother what 
 was the statement so made by the child, but the Lord 
 Justice-Clerk refused to admit the statement as part of 
 the mother's evidence. Fortunately for the ends of justice 
 the circumstantial evidence was so strong as not to require 
 the direct evidence of Janet Watson to make it convincing ; 
 but his Lordship's ruling was in some quarters deemed 
 wrong, the view being expressed that the whole case 
 ought to have gone to the jury, and that the judge had 
 no power arbitrarily to withdraw any part of it from their 
 consideration. 
 
 On the conclusion of the trial there was published in 
 the newspaper press, presumably by authority, the pre- 
 cognition of little Janet taken by the Crown : "Remember 
 my Auntie Aggie. She took me to the kirk. I ken Jack 
 (the prisoner). Was in Auntie Aggie's house on 13th 
 September. I ken Janet M'Gregor. She brought a bottle 
 of ' ffinp-er.' (Her mother explains that the child calls any- 
 thing in a bottle ' ginger.') Jack took out the cork and gied 
 Aggie ' ginger.' She fell down. Jack put her in a chair and 
 took me out. He had a nice little bottle in the garden and 
 put his foot on it. Jack told me not to tell and he would 
 give me a bawbee."(a) The precognition is interesting as 
 showing the child's intelligence, and there is little doubt 
 that the jury would have believed her statement. 
 
 John Ferguson, the Eaglesham carrier's boy, drove his 
 master's cart to Glasgow on Wednesdays and Saturdays. 
 On Saturday the 12th, the day before Agnes Montgomery's 
 death, the prisoner gave him a "line" for something to get 
 at Hart the chemist's, whose shop was at the corner of 
 Virginia and Argyle Streets, Glasgow, telling him to keep 
 the matter secret, and, if asked, to say "it w^as for a 
 portrait painter." He gave the boy sixpence. Ferguson 
 could not read, and showed the " line " to one Adam Gall, 
 a friend to whom he gave a " lift " that day on his way to 
 
 (a) Scotsman, 26th December 1857. 
 
POISOX AND PLAGIAllY 135 
 
 town. The contents were as follows: "Sept. 1857. — 
 Mr. Hart, — Please give the bearer 6cl. worth of prussic 
 acid, and oblige. — John Thomson." The writing was 
 proved to be the pannel's. Ferguson duly presented the 
 "line" at Hart's, and the assistant, Stirling, accepting the 
 portrait-painting as a sufficient reason, gave him 2 drachms 
 of Scheele's prussic acid in a glass phial. On the lad's 
 return to Eaglesham at ten o'clock on Sunday morning 
 the prisoner came to him at the stables, asked for the 
 parcel, and told him not to tell anyone about it. He 
 further said that he wanted the stuff to dye his hair black. 
 On AVednesday the 23rd Thomson gave Ferguson a similar 
 '"line," telling him to get another supply as before. At 
 Hart's the boy saw a different shopman. Young, who 
 demurred to selling poison in such circumstances ; but 
 Stirling, being consulted, said the boy had got it before and 
 mig-ht set it asjain. So another 2 drachms of prussic acid 
 were dispensed. Both "lines" were destroyed by Stirling. 
 The Lord Justice-Clerk, before that witness left the box, 
 told him he ought to have the death of the girl on his 
 mind all his life. Ferguson returned to Eaglesham on 
 Thursday morning, and at ten o'clock Thomson came to 
 the cart shed and got delivery of his parcel. He opened it, 
 uncorked the phial, and touched his hair with the cork, 
 telling Ferguson, if anyone asked what he had bought, to 
 say twopence worth of lozenges. Next day Thomson left 
 Eaglesham for Glasgow, where Mr. and Mrs. ^lason were 
 to experience the effects of this novel hair dye. 
 
 Several other witnesses were examined, from whose 
 evidence the foregoing; account is taken. There remains, 
 however, the medical testimony, which may be mentioned 
 briefly, as Mr. Hugh Cowan, who edited the trial, has 
 prefixed to his report («) exhaustive observations on the 
 medico-legal points of the case. This, being the first of 
 its kind in Scotland, naturally excited much interest in 
 professional circles. The evidence of iJr. Scott, the only 
 
 (a) Vide supra, p. 129, n. 
 
136 POISON AND PLAGIAKY 
 
 doctor who saw the girl alive, was regrettably vague, 
 and displayed, in the words of the Lord Justice-Clerk, 
 a strano-e want of recollection or observation. So far 
 as it went his account of the symptoms agreed with 
 those o-iven by the other witnesses present. He thought 
 at the time that death was due to apoplexy and certified 
 it as such. The body of Agnes Montgomery was exhumed 
 on 30th September — she died on the 13th and was buried 
 on the 17th — and that day within the parish church of 
 Eaglesham a post-mortem examination was made by Drs. 
 Daniel and Walter M'Kinlay of Paisley, assisted by Dr. 
 Scott. Dr. M'Kinlay, senior, had been a skilled witness 
 for the prosecution at the interesting trial of Christina 
 Gilmour for the murder of her husband by arsenic in 1844. 
 Owing to the advanced stage of decomposition the doctors 
 were unable to ascertain the cause of death, which, how- 
 ever, as they stated in their joint report, was neither from 
 external violence, protracted disease, nor structural change 
 in any of the important organs. Certain portions of the 
 body were therefore removed for chemical examination. 
 Dr. M'Kinlay stated that there was no appearance what- 
 ever of apoplexy ; all the indications of death from that 
 cause were absent. On opening the body a slight smell 
 of bitter almonds was perceived. With regard to the 
 subsequent analysis conducted by him and his son, they 
 found unequivocal proof of the presence of prussic acid in 
 the stomach. In view of the symptoms he had heard 
 described, coupled with the results of the post-mortem and 
 analyses, he had no doubt death was due to prussic acid. 
 In the course of a long cross-examination by Mr. Moncrieff, 
 Dr. M'Kinlay admitted that a patient who survived for 
 forty minutes generally recovered under proper treatment. 
 He had not expected to detect the acid at so long a period 
 after death. He repudiated Orfila's theory in regard to 
 the production of prussic acid in a dead body by decomposi- 
 tion. Dr. M'Kinlay, junior, concurred. Dr. (afterwards 
 Sir Douglas) Maclagan, who had made an independent 
 
POISON AND PLAGIARY 137 
 
 analysis of other portions of the body, said that he obtained 
 unequivocal proof of the presence of prussic acid in the 
 spleen. In his opinion the case was a typical one of 
 poisoning by prussic acid. In cross-examination by Mr. 
 Moncrietf, Dr. Maclagan refused to accept the theory of 
 Orfila. Each of the leading medical witnesses stated, as 
 the result of an independent analysis of the contents of 
 the whisky bottle left by the prisoner at Mason's house, 
 that it contained such a proportion of prussic acid as to 
 constitute a wineglassful of the mixture a fatal dose. At 
 the conclusion of Dr. Maclagan's evidence the Court rose. 
 
 The last day of the trial, 24th December, commenced 
 with the evidence of Professor Penny, who had given 
 expert testimony for the Crown in the' Madeleine Smith 
 case. He confirmed generally the evidence of the other 
 medical witnesses, approved the chemical tests employed, 
 and, in cross-examination, negatived Ortila's theory, which 
 he characterised as a mere assumption. This closed the 
 case for the prosecution, and as no evidence was led for the 
 defence, the Advocate-Depute addressed the jury. Directing 
 their attention to the first question in the case — Did Agnes 
 Montgomery die of poison ? — he dealt with the symptoms 
 exhibited by her, the duration of the illness, and the 
 suddenness of the attack, all of which, he maintained, were 
 characteristic of poisoning by prussic acid. On opening 
 the body no morbid appearances were found to account 
 for death, and the theory of the defence that the death 
 was due to apoplexy was excluded. Then there was the 
 odour of prussic acid perceived both in the room at the 
 time and upon the post-mortem examination. Apart 
 altogether from the result of the chemical analysis, the 
 facts justified him in asking a verdict against the pannel. 
 But prussic acid was found in the stomach by the two 
 Drs. M'Kinlay, and in the spleen by Dr. Maclagan. All 
 the medical men examined stated that the speculation or 
 assumption of Orfila was unsupported by any evidence 
 whatever. He therefore submitted that he had proved 
 
138 POISON AND PLAGIARY 
 
 beyond all reasonable doubt that Agnes Montgomery was 
 
 poisoned with prussic acid. Did she commit suicide ? Her 
 
 character and disposition rendered that improbable ; she had 
 
 no motive to take her own life, nor, unlike L'Angelier, had 
 
 she ever threatened to do so. She must, on swuUowing 
 
 the poison, have fallen at once insensible ; she could not 
 
 have raised herself so as to sit in the chair ; no phial was 
 
 found within her reach ; and she was locked into her room 
 
 from the outside. But in view of the pannel's whole 
 
 conduct the idea of suicide was out of the question, and 
 
 the fact that the Masons, at any rate, were not attempting 
 
 suicide was upon this point decisive. Was she murdered 
 
 by the prisoner at the bar? He had previous knowledge 
 
 of prussic acid, derived from the conversations about 
 
 Madeleine Smith ; he sent secretly for it an order in his 
 
 own handwriting ; he was proved to have been in the room 
 
 when the seizure occurred ; he left her, locked her in, and 
 
 returned to listen at the door. He admitted being the last 
 
 person who saw her alive, and said she was then breaking 
 
 sticks to kindle her fire, but it was proved that at the time 
 
 the fire was burning brightly. The missing phial was 
 
 found crushed on the path immediately after he had left 
 
 the spot, the missing key was discovered below the tree 
 
 where he was seen to stoop. He told Ferguson he wanted 
 
 the prussic acid for a hair dye ; in his declaration he denied 
 
 that he ever got any at all, or that he even knew what it 
 
 was. In Miss Smith's case there was some evidence to 
 
 prove that her alleged purpose in acquiring arsenic — for use 
 
 as a cosmetic — was possible, and that she had both heard 
 
 and read of it as such. In this case there was no evidence 
 
 of that kind. If the pannel gave a false reason, could there 
 
 be any doubt what was the true one ? With regard to the 
 
 question of motive, the Advocate-Depute suggested that the 
 
 pannel might either have desired to get possession of what 
 
 money the girl had in the house, or, as she had rejected his 
 
 advances and called him a liar and a blackguard, he might 
 
 have been actuated by feelings of hatred and revenge. 
 
POISON AND PLAGIAEY 139 
 
 Having reviewed the evidence concerning the Glasgow 
 charges, counsel remarked that if the jury were satisfied 
 of the prisoner's guilt upon these, they threw much light 
 upon the Eaglesham charge, which really was the important 
 one. Finally, he asked for a verdict of guilty on all three 
 charges. 
 
 Mr. Moncrieff, for the defence, said that he was not 
 bound to account for the death of Agnes Montgomery. 
 Suicide was a possible, apoplexy a probable explanation, or 
 there might have been some other undetected natural cause, 
 but murder was the greatest improbability of alh The 
 duration of the illness, if due to prussic acid, was un- 
 paralleled, and was new to the scientific world. They 
 were left in the dark by the purely medical evidence ; let 
 them see how far they were enlightened by the chemical 
 examinations. The Drs. M'Kinlay reported on the stomach 
 a week after Dr. Maclagan. They found prussic acid clearly 
 where he all but failed. They reported on the spleen three 
 weeks before him, and they failed to find it where he was 
 successful in his search. Having criticised the result of 
 the analyses at great length, counsel maintained that there 
 never was a case more favourable for the adoption of Orfila's 
 theory than the present. The fact that the pannel knew 
 the difficulty of getting prussic acid accounted for his 
 secrecy and false statements. "As to how he used it or 
 why he wished it, these are questions as to which, unfortun- 
 ately, I can give you no light." Nor was he (counsel) 
 bound to do so, the object of the inquiry being, whether the 
 prisoner used the poison to murder Agnes Montgomery ; if 
 that was not proved, it was useless to speculate. The 
 attempt to prove motive had utterly failed, but it was said 
 there was opportunity. The conduct of the parties was 
 unseen. On the evidence of two witnesses who heard certain 
 sounds, thev were asked to believe that the crime of murder 
 was committed. Excluding all subsequent discoveries, the 
 sounds themselves were worth nothing ; they aroused no 
 suspicion at the time. It was only an assumption on the 
 
140 POISON AND PLAGIAEY 
 
 part of the witnesses that Agnes did not lock herself in. 
 As for the key found at the tree, such keys were common — 
 one was readily obtained to open the door — and someone 
 might have put it there with morbid or malicious intent to 
 fill a gap in the chain of evidence. The fragments of glass 
 found in the path were of no importance against the 
 prisoner. His conduct and demeanour before and after the 
 death were, counsel contended, entirely inconsistent with 
 o-uilt. The evidence with regard to the Glasgow charges 
 was, he submitted, neither satisfactory nor conclusive, and 
 was only used by the prosecutor to strengthen his case on 
 the former charge. Finally, in a peroration more pious than 
 forensic, Mr. Moncrieff besought the jury not rashly to seek 
 to pierce the darkness in which Providence had seen fit to 
 enshroud that case of mystery and doubt. 
 
 A London medical journal in commenting on the case 
 praised the prisoner's counsel for having abstained from 
 those assertions of personal belief in the innocence of his 
 client so common south of the Tweed. 
 
 I have but space to glance at the charge of the Lord 
 Justice-Clerk. In refreshing contrast to the summing-up 
 delivered by his Lordship in each of the three great murder 
 trials at which it was his lot to preside, namely, those of 
 Mrs. Gilmour (1844), Dr. Smith (1853), and Madeleine 
 Smith (July 1857), the fullest possible weight is allowed 
 to facts proved against the pannel. Here, at least, the 
 judicial mind was free from such "reasonable doubts" as 
 unreasonably beset it in the cases mentioned, and his Lord- 
 ship's plain presumption that the Crown had substantiated 
 the truth of the charges recalls the forthright methods of 
 his Draconic colleague, Lord Deas. Well for the gentle 
 Christina, well for the ingenious physician of St. Fergus, 
 well even for the elegant Miss Smith, that they encountered 
 the Justice-Clerk in a different mood. The sophistries of the 
 defence were brushed aside like cobwebs : " It is a rash thing 
 to attempt to set a bound to man's malignity, or to suppose 
 that, because your honest and innocent hearts cannot enter 
 
POISON AXD PLAGIARY 141 
 
 into the motive of one committing sach a crime, guilt must 
 be excluded. We know not the depths of the depravity 
 and malignity of the human heart, and numbers of desperate 
 criminals would escape if we were to test things in this way, 
 and to lay aside evidence as to matters of fact from our 
 inability to understand what led the man to do the deed." 
 Thus his Lordship to this jury, upon the apparent absence 
 of motive. If they came to the conclusion, to which, as 
 Dr. Penny had remarked, they were inevitably driven, 
 that prussic acid was administered to the deceased, his 
 Lordship was afraid they could not escape the painful 
 result of the inevitable verdict merely because they were 
 unable to find a motive. There was nothing in the previous 
 history of the prisoner to render the commission of this 
 crime highly improbable, but what they had to deal with 
 were the facts of the case. 
 
 As these were too plain for misapprehension even by a 
 jury, a unanimous verdict of guilty was returned, and the 
 Justice-Clerk, remarking that the circumstances disclosed 
 on the part of the pannel a hardness of heart which his 
 Lordship could scarcely conceive, pronounced sentence of 
 death. The judge, we read, was deeply moved, but the 
 prisoner maintained to the last the stoical composure which 
 he had shown throughout his three days' trial. 
 
 The execution took place at Paisley on the 14th January 
 1858, Calcraft officiating, in presence of an immense con- 
 course of people. By the condemned mans reijuest no 
 religious service was held. Thomson, shortly after sentence, 
 acknowledged his guilt, and gave as his motive a desire to 
 possess himself of his victims' money ; but the day before 
 his death he confessed that he was driven to commit the 
 crime by an influence for which he could not account, and 
 that in his boyhood he had murdered a companion by 
 pushing him into a quarry-hole near Jiis native village. (a) 
 
 Though the story of Agnes Montgomery's fate, fearful 
 
 (a) Edmburgh Evening Gourant, 29th December 1857; Anniial Register, 
 December 1857, p. 255. 
 
142 POISOX AND PLAGIARY 
 
 as it is, admittedly lacks those dramatic and mysterious 
 elements which in other cases of poisoning have powerfully 
 possessed the popular mind, yet in point of medical and 
 psychologic interest it has an undoubted value. That the 
 criminal, a practised malefactor, was directly inspired by 
 the heroine of the recent "Great Oyer of Poisoning" is 
 certain. Even in the pretext alleged by him to the 
 carrier's boy as his reason for acquiring the poison, we hear 
 an echo of the cosmetic peculiarities of Blythswood Square. 
 "There is a strange morbid state of feeling created by the 
 discussion of such cases," the Lord Justice-Clerk told the 
 jury ; "it arises from a strange desire to possess that com- 
 mand over human life which the knowledge of such poison 
 produces, and sometimes leads, without one being able to 
 detect the object, to the commission of similar crimes." 
 And his Lordship was right ; the Glasgow cause celebre had 
 the same effect upon Thomson's mind as the discussion of 
 Palmer's case produced on the Leeds poisoner, Dove — a lust 
 of mastery over the lives of others, which from Madeleine 
 Smith's comparative acquittal he rashly inferred might be 
 indulged with impunity. As Madame de Brinvilliers began 
 her criminous career by poisoning the sick folk in the Hotel 
 Dieu, not grudgingly nor of necessity, but for mere pleasure 
 in the exercise of a diabolic power, so Thomson destroyed 
 Agnes Montgomery and attempted to destroy the Masons ; 
 and if the hideous deeds for which the marquise made so 
 terrible an expiation far outstripped the clumsy efforts of 
 the convict tailor, that was but the result of her environ- 
 ment, and nowise detracts from Mr. Thomson's performance. 
 He did what he could. France under Louis XIV. was richer 
 in possibilities of picturesque crime than mid- Victorian 
 Scotland. 
 
THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 She is loud aud stubborn ; her feet abide not in her house. 
 
 — The Book of Proverbs. 
 
 rriHIS is not a nice story ; but it is a short one, and for 
 
 a variety of reasons I think it worth the telling. To 
 
 begin with, the case to which it relates created in Edinburgh 
 
 intense interest at the time. Both Jeffrey and Cockburn, 
 
 those twin luminaries of law and literature, were associated 
 
 in the defence. Further, the matter throws some light on 
 
 the ways, not always of pleasantness, and the paths, here 
 
 other than peaceful, pursued by certain of our forebears in 
 
 the Auld Keikie of the early twenties. Finally, there is 
 
 a curious legal sequel. For which causes, pace Mrs. Grundy 
 
 and Mr. Podsnap, I propose to recall, as discreetly as may 
 
 be and without unduly fluttering the dovecots of propriety, 
 
 the forgotten circumstances of the affair. 
 
 Although no reports of the trial were published except 
 
 those which the newspapers and magazines of the day 
 
 supplied, the heroine's fate moved an anonymous scribe to 
 
 write A Biographical Account of Mary Mackinno7i, printed 
 
 and sold at the Observer office, Mound Place, Edinburgh, 
 
 in 1823. To this pamphlet, now rarely met with, I am 
 
 indebted for the few known facts regarding the life of the 
 
 unhappy woman that to some extent explain her tragic 
 
 end. Our author, too, even in a less squeamish age felt 
 
 the disadvantages attending his choice of a subject. " We 
 
 are fully sensible of the difficulty of the task which we 
 
 imposed upon ourselves when we undertook to give an 
 
 account of the unfortunate life and ignominious death of 
 
 Mary Mackinnon," he remarks in his opening sentence ; 
 
 but holding as he does that all history and biography 
 
 ought to afford either "models to regulate the conduct of 
 
 145 10 
 
146 THE STEANGE WOMAN 
 
 posterity, or examples which they ought to shun," his 
 labours are directed to the enrichment of the latter cate- 
 gory. For my purpose, however, it is regrettable that 
 his work is much fuller in moral reflections than in 
 biographical detail. 
 
 An appropriate dubiety obscures the origin of Mary 
 Mackinnon. She is believed to have been born in Ireland, 
 an only child, some thirty-two years before her earthly 
 punishment. At her trial Captain Brown, of the Edinburgh 
 City Police, stated that he had served with her father, a 
 quartermaster in the 2nd Battalion, 79th Regiment, in 
 which he himself was adjutant, and that he had known 
 her since her fifteenth year. It appears that this Mac- 
 kinnon, who had lost sight of his daughter for many years, 
 came to Edinburgh and interviewed the prisoner after her 
 condemnation, but failed to recognise her — "he unequivo- 
 cally and positively denied that the unfortunate woman was 
 at all connected with him." According to another account 
 she was the child of one Archibald Maclnnes, sometime a 
 lime-burner in Isla, where she was born, her mother being 
 a Hebridean damsel named Flora Macdouald, not, it is to 
 be presumed, the protectress of Prince Charles. From the 
 contemporary newspapers I gather that public opinion was 
 divided upon the question of her parentage ; but in the 
 notice of her execution given in the Scots Magaziyie for 
 May 1823, (a) it is said that at the last moment she admitted 
 that her name really was Maclnnes, and that her father had 
 been a private soldier. Re that fact as it may, Mary was a 
 daughter of the regiment, and as such successively visited 
 St. Helena, the Cape of Good Hope, and the East Indies ; 
 " but her recollection of these parts of the world was very 
 indistinct." When she was fifteen her mother died at 
 Dunbar, where the regiment was then quartered. Her 
 biographer gives us an ominous glimpse of the family on 
 the night of the funeral : the father hopelessly drunk, and 
 
 (a) Vol. xii. N.S. p. 637. 
 
THE STEANGE WOMAN 147 
 
 the daughter succumbing to the wiles of a young officer 
 who had for some time been paying her " very particular 
 attention." Soon after she was thus betrayed the regiment 
 left for England, and at Faversham her father consoled 
 himself with a second wife. Of this lady we are signifi- 
 cantly told that Mary had no cause for congratulation 
 on his choice of her stepmother. About a year later 
 her father quitted the army, and the family settled in 
 Glasgow. In that city Mary formed acquaintances " who 
 were not more tender of her reputation than the officer 
 who visited her on the evening of her mother's funeral"; 
 and as even the lax restraint of the parental roof grew 
 irksome to her, she left home never to return. A volun- 
 tary orphan, " without resources, without friends, without 
 religion," uneducated — she could hardly read or write — 
 impetuous, irresponsible, and attractive, her future in a 
 great city could easily be foreseen. The author passes 
 lightly over her subsequent adventures, which make but 
 sorry reading ; an expedition to Gottenburg in company 
 with a naval officer, "supposed to have been a Lieutenant 
 
 C ," is the most presentable. She returned to Scotland, 
 
 and in 18112 set up house in Edinburgh, where in due 
 course she became well if not favourably known under the 
 style and title of Mrs. Mackinnon, though it does not 
 appear that she was ever married. The character of an 
 establishment such as she maintained is best described in 
 the emphatic words of King Solomon : '" Her house is the 
 way to hell, going down to the chambers of death " ; and 
 so in very deed it was to prove, in the latter clause at 
 least, to one visitor in the year 1823. Her address was 
 No. 82 South Bridge, a common stair still extant, in which 
 she occupied a flat now appropriated to more legitimate 
 commercial uses. I have elsewhere had occasion to note 
 that the celebrated Mr. David Haoo-art visited her house 
 with a friend iti the last months of his eventful life. 
 
 On Saturday, 8th February 1823, two Edinburgh young 
 men gave a bachelor dinner party in the lodgings which 
 
148 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 they shared in Broughton Street. The hosts were Henry 
 Ker, a land-surveyor, and William Howat, a writer's clerk ; 
 the hour was four and the company mixed, the guests 
 including a cattle-dealer from Balerno named Alexander 
 Welsh, Walter Grieve, a medical student, and James John- 
 ston, described as an old man from the country. After 
 dinner the arrival of John Wilkinson, an innkeeper of 
 Bristo Street, completed the sederunt. In the course of 
 the proceedings " two or three " bottles of whisky were 
 consumed in the form of toddy, and when about nine 
 o'clock the revellers rose to convoy Mr. Wilkinson to his 
 home in Bristo, they were all visibly though unequally the 
 worse of liquor. At the trial each gentleman deponed, in 
 the manner of Baron Bradwardine after the symposion at 
 Luckie Macleary's change -house, that though personally 
 little affected by their potations, his companions were 
 " rather intoxicated," and by general consent Howat was 
 distinctly drunk. Now, Mr. Johnston, possibly because of 
 his years and rural habits, had a strong aversion from such 
 houses of entertainment as that over which Mrs. Mackinnon 
 so discreditably presided, and in accordance with the un- 
 refined humour of the age the others arranged a little joke at 
 his expense. As the party went up the North and South 
 Bridoes it was sugsested that the friends should take a 
 parting glass somewhere, and a " proposition was made of 
 going to Mr. Cooper, the boxer's." I know nothing against 
 the character of this exponent of the fistic art, but ap- 
 parently Mr, Johnston disliked its practitioners : he refused 
 to ao-ree — " he would go to a respectable house " ; where- 
 upon they crossed to the west side of the street and 
 entered No. 82, of the reputation of which the old man, 
 as a stranger, was unaware. "Mr. Johnston," says Ker, 
 " was not pleased at the company into which he had been 
 brought." He soon realised the trick that had been played 
 upon him, and took an early opportunity of retiring ; the 
 others remained in the house for twenty minutes or half 
 an hour. What happened during that time formed the 
 
THE STRANGE WOMAN 149 
 
 subject of the judicial proceedings which we are about to 
 consider. When the police appeared on the scene they 
 found that William Howat had been stabbed by somebody, 
 and was in a serious condition. All the persons present 
 in the house were taken into custody, and the wounded 
 man was removed to the Royal Infirmary, where in con- 
 sequence of his injuries he died on 20th February. On 
 the 10th of that month, in presence of Mr. George Tait, 
 Sheriff- Substitute, the dying man made a declaration as 
 to how he came by his wound, which he said had been 
 given him by Mrs. Mackinnon ; and when the prisoner was 
 shown to him, he identified her as the person referred to 
 in his declaration. 
 
 The evidence taken by the authorities led to the release 
 of all the parties concerned except Mrs. Mackinnon, who 
 on Friday, 14 th March 1823, was brought to the bar of 
 the High Court of Justiciary, charged with the crime of 
 murder, by having, on the evening of 8th February, 
 assaulted and stabbed in the breast with a table knife 
 William Howat, then clerk with Thomas Johnstone, writer 
 in Edinburgh, of which wound he languished in the In- 
 firmary until the 20th day of the same month, when he 
 died.(ct) The judges present were the Lord Justice-Clerk 
 (Boyle), and Lords Pitmilly and Meadowbank ; the counsel 
 for the Crown were the Solicitor-General (Hope), Duncan 
 M'Neil, Robert Dundas, and Archibald Alison, the future 
 historian of Europe. Francis Jeffrey, Henry Cockburn, and 
 Thomas Maitland, instructed by James Rutherford, W.S., 
 appeared for the defence. Excepting Jeffrey, the same 
 counsel had two years before defended David Haggart ; 
 of Lord Meadowbank and Mr. Rutherford we shall hear 
 further in the sequel. The pannel pleaded not guilty, and 
 no objection having been taken to the relevancy of the in- 
 dictment, a jury of Edinburgh merchants was empannelled. 
 In the written defences lodged for the prisoner it was stated 
 
 (a) The following account of the trial is given from the report of the case 
 published in the Edinburgh Literanj Gazette of 15th March 1823, pp. 97-108. 
 
160 THE STKANGE WOMAN 
 
 that she kept a licensed tavern in the South Bridge. She 
 had left her house on 8th February to visit a neighbour, 
 and during her absence a riot took place. The deceased, 
 alone with others, in a state of intoxication, came into her 
 house, she herself being absent, broke the furniture, and 
 violently assaulted certain females who lived in the house ; 
 when she returned she was herself knocked down, and if the 
 deceased sustained any injury at her hand, she knew nothing 
 of it. Her original explanation, given at the police office 
 after her apprehension, was that Wilkinson struck the fatal 
 blow, and that she had seen a knife in his hand, but this 
 statement was apparently not maintained by her at the trial. 
 
 The first witness called for the Crown was Sheriff Tait, 
 who deponed to the circumstances in which Howat emitted 
 his dying declaration, and his identification of the prisoner 
 as his assailant. This evidence was corroborated by Mr. 
 Scott, the Procurator-Fiscal. 
 
 Henry Ker was then examined. He described the dinner 
 party given by him and Howat, and the practical joke of 
 which old Mr. Johnston was meant to be the victim. He 
 himself was little affected by drink ; Howat was drunk, 
 but could walk ; Welsh and Johnston were less, Wilkinson 
 and Grieve were more, intoxicated — " all walked without 
 any assistance whatever." The whole party went up to the 
 house. They were admitted and shown into a room. An 
 order for a jug of toddy was immediately executed. This 
 was discussed with the assistance of divers damsels who re- 
 sided there under the equivocal auspices of Mrs. Mackinnon. 
 He identified Elizabeth M'Donald, Elizabeth Gray, and 
 Mary Curley as three of the girls in question. The toddy 
 dispatched and paid for, his party proposed to leave, but the 
 ladies said " it was a shame for them to go away for one 
 jug ; there ought to be jugs apiece." This discussion, which 
 at first was academic and conducted with good humour, was 
 continued in the passage and resumed in the kitchen, where, 
 appropriately, it increased in warmth. There they found 
 two other fair boarders, ^Margaret White and Margaret Orr. 
 
THE STEANGE WOMAN 151 
 
 Mr. Johnston meanwhile had prudently made his escape. 
 The ladies then locked the house door, and refused to allow 
 their visitors to leave unless more drink was forthcoming. 
 Ker was chiefly engaged in controversy with Miss M 'Donald, 
 a vigorous and stalwart nymph, who vehemently opposed 
 his going, laid violent hands upon him, tore his shirt frill, 
 spoilt his hat, and knocked him down l)ehind the kitchen 
 door. On his regaining his feet the amazon again fell upon 
 him, so Ker, determined to get out, tripped her up with his 
 foot. He remembered Grieve saying to him, " Don't strike 
 a woman," to which he replied that he would not do so. 
 This was all the violence used by him that night, and was 
 only what was necessary in order to extricate himself. He 
 rejoined Welsh and Wilkinson, who were in the passage. 
 M 'Donald at once followed, and made an attack upon 
 Wilkinson, striking him with her clenched fists. Ker went 
 back to the kitchen to bring out Howat, who was standing 
 at the fireplace, Grieve being also there. He heard no cries 
 of murder. There were candles in the rooms and passage, 
 but none of his party had a candlestick in his hand. At 
 this moment Mrs. Mackinnon, whom they had not seen that 
 night, entered the kitchen. " Stand back," she cried; "let 
 
 me get a knife, and I'll soon settle the b s ! " There 
 
 was then no disturbance going on, and nobody was attacking 
 M'Donald. Mrs. Mackinnon went straight to the dresser 
 and deliberately selected a knife from a tray. No one had 
 spoken to her at that time. He noticed a strange man 
 (Samuel Hodge) and woman (Jean Lundie) at the kitchen 
 door. With the knife in her hand Mrs. Mackinnon made a 
 spring at Ker ; he parried the blow aimed at him, and she 
 was then restrained by M'Donald and Lundie. No violence 
 was ofi'ered to her or to any of the women after that. The 
 man Hodge took no part. Welsh and Wilkinson were still in 
 the passage, and all the women were in the kitchen. He next 
 found that Howat, beset by both Mackinnon and M'Donald, 
 was keeping them at bay with his clenched fists. He saw 
 the pannel raise her right hand with the knife in it over her 
 
152 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 left shoulder, and make a sweeping thrust at Howat. He 
 at once seized her and tripped her up, but it was too late : 
 the blow was given suddenly, and took effect on the left side. 
 He went to his friend's aid. Howat said to him, " Henry, 
 she has given me a wound," and fainted. Blood was flowing 
 from the left side ; the vest was opened and he saw the 
 wound. No one but the pannel had a knife at the time. 
 He did not notice what became of the women after his 
 friend was struck ; none of them offered any assistance. 
 When the police arrived he asked to be taken to the office. 
 All his party went there willingly. He was almost con- 
 stantly with Howat till his death, and heard him name 
 Mrs. Mackinnon as his assailant. Only one question, as 
 to the length of time the party were in the house, was 
 asked in cross-examination. 
 
 John Wilkinson corroborated the evidence of Ker. He 
 and Welsh left the house when Johnston did, but hearing a 
 noise of quarrelling, they turned at the top of the stair and 
 went back. They did not enter the kitchen, but remained 
 in the passage. He saw Mrs. Mackinnon come in from the 
 street ; she seemed angry, and " scolded " as she passed him. 
 M'Donald came out of the kitchen and struck him violently 
 on the breast. Welsh prevented him from retaliating. No 
 violence was used to the girl. He heard Ker cry out that 
 Howat was stabbed. He then entered the kitchen, and saw 
 Mrs. Mackinnon and the women standing about, and Howat, 
 wounded and bleeding, in a chair. He did not recollect 
 noticing any strange man, nor did he see any person with a 
 knife. In cross-examination, Wilkinson admitted that at 
 the time he was " very much intoxicated," but said he had 
 a perfectly clear recollection of what happened. There was 
 no quarrel prior to his leaving the house the first time. In 
 reply to questions by the Court and jury, he stated that 
 personally he had no struggle with anyone that night. He 
 remembered the prisoner at the police office " charging him 
 with the murder." He was quite certain that while in the 
 passage he heard Ker cry that Howat was wounded. 
 
THE STEANGE WOMAN 153 
 
 Alexander Welsh corroborated the account given by the 
 previous witnesses. From the passage he could not see 
 what was going on in the kitchen. ^Irs. Mackinnon, with 
 a man and a woman (Hodge and Lundie) came in from the 
 street. "The landlady was apparently in a passion," but 
 he could not recollect the words uttered by her. He heard 
 Ker call out that Howat was stabbed, and he and Wilkinson 
 then entered the kitchen. Wilkinson was not in the kitchen 
 until after he heard the cry. He saw no one with a knife 
 that nioht. 
 
 Walter Grieve, medical student, corroborated the state- 
 ments of his friends. He went into the kitchen to get 
 the other two men away, but Ker would not leave with- 
 out Howat. Before Ker came in, he saw Howat strike 
 M'Donald on the head. M'Donald assaulted Ker and after- 
 wards Wilkinson ; she seized a candlestick, which witness 
 took from her. Mrs. Mackinnon came in with Hodge 
 and Lundie. He did not see the blow struck, but saw 
 Mackinnon falling down and heard her cry " Murder ! " 
 At the same time Ker called out that Howat was stabbed. 
 In cross-examination, he admitted that he did not notice 
 Mrs. Mackinnon's presence in the kitchen till he saw her 
 lying on the floor. There was nothing to prevent his 
 leaving when Johnston and the others left. 
 
 The declaration of Howat was then read, which agreed 
 generally with Ker's account of what occurred. He tried 
 to ward off the blow, but failed ; the knife struck him on 
 the left breast, below the collar. None of his companions 
 except Ker could have seen the thrust given. He was 
 certain Mrs. Mackinnon was the person who struck him. 
 
 Elizabeth M'Donald was next called. IShe alleged that 
 after the toddy incident Wilkinson " used her in a very 
 uncivil manner," smashed a chair, and followed her into 
 the kitchen, where he again attacked her. Ker came in 
 shortly after, took up a candlestick from the dresser, and 
 struck her with it on the breast, "which became black in 
 consequence." He afterwards twice assaulted her. Margaret 
 
154 THE STRANGE WOMAK 
 
 M'Innes (the servant) took the candlestick from him. The 
 witness's version of the episode became, upon further re- 
 search, so obscure that the Solicitor-General moved to have 
 her answers judicially taken down, and the Lord Justice- 
 Clerk warned her to be careful, remarking that a more con- 
 tradictory testimony had never been given in any Court. 
 After taking her in hand himself, his Lordship observed 
 that it was his sacred duty to tell the jury that her evidence 
 was not worth their attention. Cross-examined by Jeffrey, 
 M'Donald said Mary Curley went out for Mrs. Mackinnon, 
 who had been away two hours. When the latter returned 
 she ran into the kitchen crying, " In the name of God, what 
 is this ? " Wilkinson and Ker were then in the kitchen. 
 Wilkinson knocked Mrs. Mackinnon down and tore her cap. 
 Ker, in trying to strike Mrs. Mackinnon, struck witness 
 on the shoulder. Wilkinson held Mrs. Mackinnon down. 
 Howat was sitting on a chair, leaning his head on the 
 dresser. The police arrived, and he was carried to another 
 room. She did not see Mrs. Mackinnon with a knife in her 
 hand, nor standing opposite Howat. The latter was, in her 
 judgment, "tipsy"; the others were merely "hearty"; she 
 herself was sober. A long re-examination by the Solicitor- 
 General only involved Miss M'Donald's evidence in greater 
 confusion — even the reporter apologises for his inability to 
 render it intelligible. 
 
 The demoiselles Gray and Curley were also examined. 
 Their testimony added little to the facts already proved, 
 but each of them alleged that she had been assaulted by 
 some one of the visitors : they kept, in their evidence, as 
 much as possible out of the kitchen, and swore they saw 
 nothing of the murder. Jane Lundie, residing in Lover's 
 Lane, Leith Walk, said she was at Hodge's with Mrs. 
 Mackinnon on the night in question, and followed her to 
 the South Bridge house, where she " perceived a great con- 
 fusion in the passage." When she entered the kitchen 
 " there was a gentleman on a chair," and Mrs. Mackinnon 
 was lying on the floor. She assisted her to rise. Samuel 
 
THE STRAIS^GE WOMAN 155 
 
 Hodge, grocer, Cowgate, stated that when he reached the 
 house he found several men and women in the passage. 
 They seemed to be quarrelling with one another, but no 
 violent blows were given. His account of what he saw in 
 the kitchen tallied with that given by Lundie. 
 
 James Stuart, apprentice surgeon, deponed that he 
 entered the house along with the police. He found "a 
 great bustle of people" in the passage. Mrs. Mackinnon, 
 who seemed agitated, told him that some men had come 
 into the house and assaulted several of the inmates. The 
 police summoned him to the kitchen, where he saw a man 
 sitting in a state of stupor, with a large wound in his chest. 
 He attended to him at once ; none of the women offered 
 their aid. Ker and Grieve seemed quite sensible, and well 
 aware of what was going on. 
 
 Robert Allan and William Newbigging, surgeons to the 
 Royal Infirmary, described the nature of the wound and the 
 varying symptoms of the patient from his entry into the 
 infirmary until his death, as also the results of the post- 
 mortem examination of his body. The wound in the chest 
 was unquestionably the cause of death. Dr. William 
 Dumbreck corroborated their report. 
 
 Sir Robert Christison, in his notes upon the case re- 
 marks : " The body was examined in the Royal Infirmary 
 by warrant of the Sheriff, in my presence, but as an un- 
 concerned spectator only. A gash was found in the left 
 ventricle of the heart : whereupon the inspection was about 
 to be brought to an end by sewing up the body. But I 
 stepped up to the inspecting surgeons, and suggested that 
 they should fix exactly the direction of the wound. It was 
 then seen that the knife, after severing the cartilage of the 
 second left rib, had penetrated to the left, somewhat inward, 
 and very much downward. This fact proved to be of great 
 consequence. The friends of the murdered man were tipsy 
 at the time, and those of the woman were on other grounds 
 untrustworthy. The woman stated in her declaration that 
 the young man and his companions having become up- 
 
156 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 roarious and rude, she seized the knife in self-defence, and 
 held it before her with the point sloping forwards and 
 upwards, when he stumbled towards her upon its point. 
 One of his friends, on the other hand, swore he distinctly 
 saw the woman hold the knife daggerwise, raise her hand 
 towards her left ear, and strike towards her own right and 
 downwards — in which way exactly would such a wound as 
 was found be produced." (a) 
 
 The Crown case closed with the reading of the pannel's 
 declaration, in which she denied all concern in the murder 
 of Howat, and threw the whole blame of it upon his own 
 party. 
 
 Only five witnesses were examined for the defence. Dr. 
 Black, police surgeon, said he was called to Mrs. Mackinnon's 
 house, where a young man had been w^ounded. He saw 
 her that evening, and attended her professionally for several 
 days. She complained of pain in her head from having 
 been knocked down, and also of spitting blood. She seemed 
 distressed both in mind and body. He found one bruise on 
 her side. He had likewise attended Elizabeth M'Donald. 
 He found the mark of a blow, apparently from a fist, upon 
 her left breast, and her face bore marks of violence, but 
 these w^ere more evident on the night in question. He also 
 attended Margaret M'Innes, who complained of a violent 
 injury on the side, of which he could find no trace. James 
 Christie, keeper of the Lock-up House, deponed that on 
 the night when Mrs. Mackinnon was entrusted to his care 
 he observed blood on her cap, and she complained of pain 
 in her head. He saw her spit blood once only. Mrs. Sherifi", 
 wife of John Sheriff", upholsterer, Cowgate, stated that on 
 the night of the "accident" at Mrs. Mackinnon's, a boy 
 named John Smith, who resided with witness, was sent by 
 her on an errand to the Abbey. John Smith, aged four- 
 teen, said he knew the pannel, and had heard of the 
 "accident" in her house. She asked him to go an errand 
 
 (o) The Life of Sir Robert Christison, Bart, Edinburgh, 1885, i. 292-293. 
 
THE STRANGE WOMAN 157 
 
 that night about half-past ten. He saw her at Hodge's shop. 
 While there, the girl Curley came in and said some men 
 were in the house "putting M 'Donald into the fire." He 
 ran to the house before the pannel, and saw a man executing 
 that barbarous purpose upon the young lady in question. 
 When Mrs. Mackinnon arrived she sent him for the police. 
 He found a watchman at the head of Blair Street. On 
 leaving the house he heard cries of murder. Captain Brown, 
 late Superintendent of Police, stated that he had served for 
 several years in the same regiment with the prisoner's father, 
 and had known her ever since she was fifteen, when she was 
 seduced in atrocious circumstances by an officer. From that 
 time her father neglected her in the most shameful manner. 
 Her disposition was always humane and peaceful ; he knew 
 nothing peculiar about her house. 
 
 The exculpatory proof being here closed, the Solicitor- 
 General addressed the jury for the Crown. After some 
 general remarks upon the painful character of the case, and 
 certain moral observations thereon which need not detain us, 
 he commented severely upon the "wilful and horrible 
 perjury" committed by the witnesses for the defence. The 
 exhibition of Master Smith and the tale he told could not 
 be too strongly reprobated; and he was sure his learned 
 friend did not expect such statements to come from the boy, 
 which were flatly contradicted by his own witnesses. If 
 the jury believed that the pannel struck the blow, the 
 charge could only be evaded by the plea of self-defence, or 
 by evidence that there was such extreme provocation given 
 as justified a verdict of calpable homicide. It was clearly 
 proved that the blow was dealt by the pannel, and from the 
 evidence no conclusion could be drawn which would justify 
 the use of lethal weapons. He then examined the evidence 
 of Ker, which, he held, received great support from the state- 
 ment of Stuart, who swore distinctly to Ker's sobriety and 
 capacity of observation. With regard to the allegations of 
 M' Donald, all that Ker did was merely to extricate himself 
 from her grasp. To the pannel, before she struck Howat, 
 
158 THE STEANGE WOMAN 
 
 no violence whatever was used, but after the fatal blow 
 was given Ker tripped her up. It was natural for him to 
 spring forward to his friend's relief when he saw Howat in 
 such imminent danger. Her fall might well account for the 
 symptoms described by Dr. Black. After reviewing the 
 evidence of the rest of the party, which completely refuted 
 the insinuation that the blow was given by Wilkinson or by 
 any of the men, he said that their united testimony formed 
 a body of evidence strong and irresistible, agreeing in all 
 its substantial features. Each of the witnesses for the 
 defence, on the other hand, told a different story, and every 
 one more incredible than another. They contradicted each 
 other in every important fact, and it was material to note 
 that none of them alluded to the absurd idea of Wilkinson 
 being the murderer, which was the real groundwork of the 
 defence. It was clearly shown by the proof that no justi- 
 fication of a recourse to lethal weapons could be maintained ; 
 and he therefore submitted that if the jury were satisfied 
 the wound was inflicted by the pannel, they must find her 
 guilty of murder. 
 
 Jeffrey's speech for the defence has, unfortunately, not 
 come down to us. The proceedings had lasted for fourteen 
 consecutive hours, and the reporter pleads physical exhaus- 
 tion for his failure to supply even an outline of that " warm, 
 eloquent, and impassioned address." This is the more 
 regrettable that, in view of what Lord Cockburn well calls 
 " the bad elements in his hands," it would have been 
 interesting to learn how Jeffrey treated a case apparently so 
 hopeless. His efibrt must have been a brilliant one, for 
 Cockburn reckons the speech " beautiful," and says it is 
 "remembered to this hour."(a) Probably, as his Lord- 
 ship's adjective suggests, Jeffrey's appeal was directed to the 
 hearts rather than to the heads of the jury. He made the 
 most of the inevitable discrepancies in the evidence of the 
 Grown witnesses, which, he said, precluded an undoubted 
 
 (a) Journal of Henry Cockburn, i. 142 ; Circuit Journeys, p. 340. 
 
THE STKANGE WOMAN 159 
 
 conviction of guilt, and argued that, even in the most 
 unfavourable light, the circumstances in which the prisoner 
 was placed justified her having recourse to lethal weapons. 
 " Mr. Jeffrey concluded with a strong and energetic appeal 
 to the feelings of the jury on behalf of the unfortunate 
 creature, who early in life had been cast on the wide world 
 with a diminished reputation, and had been deserted by 
 those whose reclaiming discipline might have drawn her 
 from the dreadful course of iniquity in which she had 
 indulored." 
 
 The Lord Justice-Clerk then charged the jury "in a 
 luminous and comprehensive speech," of which the particulars 
 are not reported. His Lordship told the jury that more 
 credit ought to be attached to the evidence of the men than 
 that of the women upon those points in which the two 
 came into collision, and that there was nothing in the 
 circumstances of the case to render the act justifiable. The 
 jury, after retiring for twenty minutes, returned their verdict, 
 finding, by a plurality of voices, the pannel guilty of the 
 crime of murder ; but they, also by a majority, recommended 
 her to mercy. She was accordingly sentenced to be 
 executed at Edinburgh on 16th April, and her body there- 
 after to be given to Dr. Alexander Monro for dissection, his 
 Lordship adding that though he could see no grounds in the 
 circumstances of the case for the jury's recommendation, it 
 would be forwarded to the proper quarter. When the 
 verdict was returned the prisoner fainted, and after receiv- 
 ing sentence she fainted again ; as the Court rose she 
 was "lying extended, apparently lifeless, on the seat." It 
 must have been an ugly business. 
 
 The Edinburgh Evening Courant of 15th March 1823 
 ends its account of the case as follows: "The trial lasted 
 from ten o'clock yesterday until four o'clock this morning, 
 and so great was the interest excited that by an early hour 
 yesterday morning all the doors of the Court were crowded 
 with people. Strong bodies of the police were stationed in the 
 Court and at the doors to preserve order, but so great was 
 
160 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 the pressure and the anxiety to gain admission that once or 
 twice the Court had to announce that unless better order 
 was kept the room would be cleared. The Parliament 
 Square during the whole day, and even until the termina- 
 tion of the trial, was filled with people anxious to learn 
 the progress." It appears that the verdict met with popular 
 approval, but people were surprised that it was not unani- 
 mous. Application for a reprieve seems to have been made 
 in accordance with the jury's recommendation, and Cockburn 
 states that if certain circumstances which were established 
 in a precognition taken after the conviction by order of Sir 
 Robert Peel, then Home Secretary, had transpired on the 
 trial, it is more than probable that Jeffrey would have pre- 
 vailed on the jury to restrict their finding to culpable 
 homicide. " But in law it was a murder, and Peel, though 
 moved, was advised that she could not be spared. "(a) I 
 have failed to find any other reference to this extrajudicial 
 inquiry, of which no particulars seem to have been published. 
 The execution, which took place at the head of Libber- 
 ton's Wynd in the Lawnmarket on the appointed day, 
 attracted an immense concourse of people, estimated at not 
 less than 20,000, numbers of whom had arrived on the 
 preceding day from various parts of the country. "From 
 the site of the old Weigh House to the Exchange, the 
 multitude presented a solid mass ; and the windows and 
 house-tops within that space were also covered with 
 spectators."(?>) Cockburn has preserved a curious anecdote 
 of the occasion : " She died publicly, but gracefully and 
 bravely ; and her last moment was marked by a proceeding 
 so singular, that it is on its account that I mention her 
 case. She had an early attachment to an English Jew, 
 who looked like a gentleman, on the outside at least ; and 
 this passion had never been extinguished. She asked him 
 to come and see her before her fatal day. He did so ; and 
 on parting, finally, on her last evening, she cut an orange 
 
 (a) Circuit Journeys, p. 340. 
 
 (6) Scots Magazine, vol. xii. N.S. p. 637. 
 
An Iv\k(;i tion at Liddkrtox's Wynd-ITead, 
 
 (Alt-T an ftcliiiig by Walti-r Geikift.) 
 
THE STEANGE WOMAN 161 
 
 into two, and giving him one half, and keeping the other 
 herself, directed him to go to some window opposite the 
 scaffold, at which she could see him, and to apply his half 
 to his lips when she applied her half to hers. All this was 
 done ; she saw her only earthly friend, and making the 
 sign, died, cheered by this affection. Here the anecdote 
 ou^yht to have ended : and if it had been an invention, it 
 would have ended here. But see how nature's wonders 
 exceed those of art. She had left everything she had, 
 amounting to four or five thousand pounds, to her friend. 
 He took the legacy, but refused to pai/ the costs of her 
 defence, which her agent only screwed out of him by an 
 action, "(a) 
 
 The episode of the symbolic orange is also recounted by 
 George Combe, W.S., and may be read in his observations 
 on the cerebral development of Mrs. Mackinnon.(/>) The 
 philosopher makes a comparative analysis of the characters 
 of that lady and of David Haggart, another of Edinburgh's 
 black sheep, deduced by him from their "bumps," and 
 illustrated by certain grim engravings of their respective 
 heads, as shaved to facilitate the application of his art after 
 their owners had no further use for them. The woman's 
 features, of the Bourbon type, are surprisingly aristocratic, 
 and indicate an imperious temper. "It is impossible to 
 doubt," writes Combe, " that the murder of Mr. Howat was 
 committed on the impulse of the moment," and he finds upon 
 inquiry that Mrs. Mackinnon was " excessively prone to 
 rage," a weakness of which he gives several examples. To 
 her highly developed destructiveness he attributes the 
 complacency with which she viewed the death of her victim, 
 while her equally powerful secretiveness accounts in his 
 opinion for her persistent denial of guilt. Doubtless the 
 conclusions of the amiable scientist were not arrived at 
 without perusal of the Biograjohical Account before cited, 
 which furnishes many instances characteristic of the heroine's 
 
 {a). Journal, i. 142-143 ; Circuit Journeys, 340-341. 
 
 (b) Transactions of the Phrenological Society, Edinburgh, 1824, pp. 362-379. 
 
162 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 mentality. As might be looked for in one of her ill-regulated 
 life she was strongly emotional and superstitious, and her 
 volatile disposition was the despair of the ministers who 
 attended her while in prison. When they pointed out with 
 Whom all hope of mercy must ultimately lie, she remarked, 
 " But it can do no harm to try George IV. in the meantime " ! 
 
 Despite its more than prosaic circumstances the case 
 begot upon the local Muse a little progeny of ballads, neither 
 better nor worse than those to which similar occasions have 
 o-iven birth. Of these, Mackinnons Ghost and Mary 
 Mackinnons Lament are not of much account, but Mac- 
 kinnons Garland, " To the Tune of ' Catherine Ogie,' " 
 rinss throuo;hout its dozen stanzas with a robustious ribald 
 humour, unfortunately too untrammelled for quotation. 
 
 Cockburn's reference to the baseness of Mrs. Mackinnons 
 residuary legatee regarding the costs of her defence has 
 o-iven me some trouble, and is difficult of verification. 
 I find that on 31st January 1825 there was tried in the 
 Jury Court, before Lord Chief Commissioner Adam, an action 
 by James Rutherford, W.S., against Robert Baird, accountant 
 in Edinburgh, for payment of the expense of defending the 
 late Mrs. Mackinnon on her trial. («) The defence was that 
 the defender did not employ the pursuer, nor did he subse- 
 quently render himself responsible for payment of the 
 account. The issue submitted, which had been approved 
 by Lord Meadowbank, before whom the action was raised in 
 the Court of Session, was as follows : " It being admitted 
 that the pursuer was employed as agent to conduct the 
 defence of the late Mrs. Mackinnon, and did conduct her 
 defence accordingly, — Whether the pursuer was so employed 
 by, and on the credit and responsibility of, the said Mrs. 
 Mackinnon ? or by, and on the credit and responsibility of, 
 the defender? or by, and on the credit and responsibility 
 of, the defender and Mrs. Mackinnon jointly ? " Fullarton 
 and Rutherford appeared for the pursuer ; Jefi'rey, Skene, 
 
 (a) Murray's Reports of Cases Tried in the Jury Court, vol. iii. p. 489. 
 
THE STKANGE WOMAN 163 
 
 and Gillies for the defender. At the outset the Lord Chief 
 Commissioner observed that in this issue the only fact was 
 the employment ; the credit and responsibility were points 
 of law. He could not allow the jury to put a finding of 
 law upon the face of their verdict. The verdict might 
 either be on the fact, or a general verdict, the Court 
 stating the law. After evidence had been led, it was 
 argued for the pursuer that he was employed by Mrs. 
 Mackinnon and the defender, and that he did not deny 
 his liability till six months after her death, though there 
 had been frequent demands made upon him. Jeifrey replied 
 that no case had been made out ; it was only proved that 
 the defender assisted another person in defending Mrs. 
 Mackinnon, and made certain payments out of her funds. 
 The evidence showed that the pursuer was employed before 
 the defender saw him. His Lordship charged the jury, and 
 after reviewing the evidence, said : "As this is an issue 
 drawn in the Court of Session, I feel anxious as to the 
 verdict to be returned. If you think the pursuer has not 
 made out his case, you may find for the defender ; but if 
 you think he has made out his case, it is difficult to say 
 what finding you ought to return, as the verdict must be 
 returned to the Court of Session for that Court to find 
 the law. If a general issue had been sent, then a verdict 
 upon it w^ould have been a warrant for judgment here. 
 The issue would have been, whether the defender alone, or 
 along with Mrs. Mackinnon, undertook to pay, and the 
 jury could then have distinctly found oneway or other; but 
 here the question is so put, that if the jury make a return 
 in terms of the issue, it would be putting a point of law on 
 the face of the verdict. This you must try to avoid, and 
 will find for the pursuer or defender, according to the 
 opinion you have formed on the facts and circumstances." 
 The verdict, therefore, was simply " For the defender." 
 
 To the lay mind these particulars may perhaps, like the 
 bones to the prophet Ezekiel, seem "very dry," but they 
 are none the less relevant, as will presently appear. 
 
164 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 The Jury Court was then a comparative novelty in 
 Scotland. Instituted in 1816, it marked the introduction of 
 trial by jury in civil causes. "A separate court, a presiding 
 judge trained to English practice, special issues, and no more 
 extensive jurisdiction in matters of law than was indis- 
 pensable for the trial of facts, were all necessary at first," 
 says Oockburn,(a) and of the Chief Commissioner he 
 remarks : " Adam had the misfortune to come into this new 
 scene under exaggerated expectations of what he was to 
 do" ; but he adds, "No one else could have either launched 
 or piloted it. "(6) So dissatisfied was Adam with Lord 
 Meadowbank's conduct of the case that he took what must 
 have been the very unusual course of reporting the matter 
 at length to Lord Chancellor Eldon. From the matter as 
 represented by him, " it cannot fail to appear," he wrote, 
 " not only how little the framing of issues is understood in 
 the Court of Session, but it also serves to exhibit the 
 difiiculties which have presented themselves in tryiug special 
 issues, from the commencement of the institution to the 
 present moment." Naturally Lord Meadowbank was 
 exceeding wroth with the Chief Commissioner, and in his 
 turn he addressed an open letter to the Lord Chancellor 
 on the vexed question of the issue in Rutherford v. Baird, 
 annexins: thereto the condescendence and answers of the 
 parties to that process. Printed copies of these documents 
 were circulated privately, and to one of them I am indebted 
 for the details. It seems from the record that the " other 
 person " mentioned by Jefi"rey as associated with the defence 
 was one Abraham Lyons, " who took an interest in Mrs. 
 Mackinnon's fate." This must be the English Jew of 
 Cockburn's anecdote, "who looked like a gentleman on the 
 outside," but I can find no trace of any attempt to " screw " 
 the costs out of him by an action. Meadowbank stoutly 
 combated the charge of incapacity brought against him 
 by the Chief Commissioner, and complained with justice of 
 
 (a) Memorials of His Time, 1856, p. 295. 
 (6) Ibid., pp. 296, 298. 
 
THE STRANGE WOMAK 165 
 
 "that learned person" having refrained from all previous 
 communication with him on the subject, either before the 
 trial of Rutherford's case, or when preparing the address to 
 the Chancellor, and also of the circulation of the latter a 
 fortnicrht before it was brouorht to his notice. He maintained 
 that the issue was correctly framed, and that he was con- 
 firmed in that view by " the concurring opinions of the 
 whole counsel in the case." In conclusion, his Lordship 
 observed that he had formerly been obliged, in discharging 
 another public duty, to state to the Parliamentary Commis- 
 sioners " the great unpopularity of the Jury Court, and the 
 prejudices entertained against it, as well as the circumstances 
 to which those feelings were to be attributed." His doing 
 so could hardly fail to be remembered by its learned head, 
 who, like Queen Mary, may thenceforth have studied 
 revenge; but in 1830 the Jury Court ceased to exist as a 
 separate Court, and with it went the power of the Chief 
 Commissioner. A Parliament House wit likened it to the 
 garden of Eden : " because it was made for Adam." What 
 action, if any, the Lord Chancellor saw fit to take in the 
 matter does not appear. 
 
 Alexander Maconochie, Lord Meadowbank, second of that 
 judicial title and the friend of Sir Walter Scott, presided at 
 the famous Theatrical Fund Dinner in Edinburgh, on 23rd 
 February 1827, when the identity of " The Great Unknown " 
 was publicly revealed. " Meadowbank taxed me with the 
 novels," writes the Author of Waverley, "and to end the 
 farce at once I pleaded guilty, so that splore is ended."(a) 
 The first Lord Meadowbank was a man of great ability and 
 varied accomplishments, by whose shining qualities, in the 
 opinion of the Parliament House, his son and successor was 
 somewhat overshadowed. The latter is said once to have 
 interrupted the pugnacious John Clerk, who was pleading 
 before him, to ask the distinction between the words " also " 
 and "likewise," which counsel was reiterating in the course 
 
 (a) Journal of Sir Walter Scott, i. 364. 
 
166 THE STRANGE WOMAN 
 
 of his argument, and which the judge deemed synonymous 
 terms. " Your Lordship's father," came the unexpected 
 retort, " was Lord Meadowbank ; your Lordship is Lord 
 Meadowbank also, but not likewise ! " Cockburn, however, 
 calls him a curious and able man ; and Mr. Omond remarks 
 of him that, " although not equal to his father, he was a 
 painstaking and conscientious judge. "(a) 
 
 (a) The Lord Advocates of Scotland, ii. 255. 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 quale hoc hurly-burly fuit ! si forte vidisses 
 Pipantes arsas, et flavo sanguine breickas 
 Dripantee, hominumque heartas ad prcelia faintas. 
 
 — Polemo-Middinia. 
 
 THE causeway of Auld Eeikie was long regarded by 
 factious persons as an appropriate venue for the 
 settlement by combat of their private feuds, and the 
 resulting tulzies, to employ the technical term for such 
 rencounters, were of common occurrence in the capital. 
 Even readers unversed in the story of her turbulent past 
 will remember the conflict between the Seytons and the 
 Leslies, so vividly described in The Abbot, by which Sir 
 Walter illustrates and keeps in mind this old uncivil 
 custom. Contemporary annalists make repeated mention of 
 these public brawls. There was the famous street skirmish 
 in 1520 between the Hamiltons and the Douglases, known 
 as Cleanse the Causeway, when the latter, as Pitscottie 
 records, " keiped both the gaitt and their honouris"; and 
 that in 1551 between the Kerrs and the Scotts, 
 
 When the streets of High Dunedin 
 Saw lances gleam and falchions redden, 
 And heard the slogan's deadly yell — 
 Then the Chief of Branxholm fell. 
 
 We recall, too, how in 1593 Sir James Sandilands, one of 
 King James's minions, slew in a scuffle " at ye fitt of Leith 
 wynd " a Lord of Session against whom he bore a grudge, 
 and when in the following year the Lord Chancellor and 
 others sought to avenge the murder in a High Street tulzie, 
 his Lordship, finding the tide of battle unfavourable, " re- 
 teirit himself with glaydnes to the College of Justice," 
 
 169 
 
170 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 as the Historic of King James the Sext quaintly reports. 
 Sandilands was sorely wounded, " bot convalescit agayne." 
 Robert Birrel, the old Edinburgh diarist, notes divers 
 instances of such affrays: "The 24 of November [1567], 
 at 2 afternoon, ye laird of Airthe and ye laird of Weeims 
 mett upone ye heigh gait of Edinburghe ; and they and 
 ther followers faught a verey bloudey skirmish, quher ther 
 wes maney hurte one both sydes vith shote of pistol." — 
 "The 4 day of November [1601], being ane fair day in Edr. 
 [that is, not a dry, but a market day] ane combat foughten 
 betwixt the Keirs and the Turnbulls, qr. yair wes grate 
 bluid."— "The 17 of Junii [1605], ane combat or tulzie 
 foughten at the salt tron of Edr. betwixt the laird of Ogle, 
 zounger, and hes complices, and the zoung laird of Pitt- 
 arow, Wischart. The faucht lastit frae 9 hours at night 
 till ij at night, twa hours. Yair wer sundrie hurt one both 
 sydes, and ane Guthrie slaine, which wes Pittarow's man, 
 ane verie prettie zoung man." 
 
 Nor did the contentious citizens rest satisfied merely 
 with internecine strife : a favourite variation was to com- 
 bine against constituted authority. An " Account of Mobbs 
 at Edinbg.," preserved among the Newcastle MSS. in the 
 British Museum, prepared for the instruction of the Govern- 
 ment during the affair of the Porteous riot, gives a succinct 
 resume of these metropolitan disturbances. Thus, " about 
 the year 1701 the Mob rose in Edinburgh, burst open 
 the Door of the Tolbooth, and released what Prisoners 
 they thought fit. This is commonly called the Darien 
 Mob." The next example is that of the mob which, in 
 1705, insisted on the hanging of Captain Green and his 
 crew, whom Queen Anne was disposed to pardon. The 
 deliberations of the Privy Council were distracted by a 
 furious multitude clamouring at their doors ; the Lord 
 Chancellor was attacked with stones and sticks, "his Coach 
 being broke to pieces, and my Lord run up the stairs of a 
 house." During the debates upon the Treaty of Union, 
 " the Mob were so insolent as to beat with stickes and clubs 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 171 
 
 'S#: 
 
 The College Combat. 
 {From a Contemporary Drawing by Professor Edward Forbes.) 
 
172 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 at the very Door of the Eoom where the Parliament was 
 actually sitting," and the Lord High Commissioner and the 
 Lords of the Council, in passing between Holyrood and the 
 Parliament House, "durst not go in their coaches, but 
 were forced at the hazzard of their lives to walk with 
 their servants through the streets where the mob was 
 so assembled." Apparently the carriages of the great had 
 an inflammatory effect upon the passions of the Edinburgh 
 proletariat. Again, in 1734, "two Apprentices were put in 
 prison for a misdemeanour by the Magistrates," says the 
 same authority, with a fine disregard for the principles of 
 collocation, " upon which the Mob rose and marched 
 towards the Nether Bow Port, where Major Leighton met 
 them with the Canongate Guard ; the Mob attacked the 
 Troops with great stones and wounded the Major." Finally, 
 on the memorable night of 7th September 1736, the 
 citizens achieved international celebrity by the taking of 
 the Tolbooth and the lynching of Captain Porteous. That 
 was the last serious engagement, the mob in after years 
 finding sufficient relief for their unruly passions in the 
 periodic differences with the Town Guard, immortalised in 
 the poems of Robert Fergusson. 
 
 It is interesting to find from Steven's History of the 
 High School of Edinburgh, that even the scholars of those 
 times were rebellious beyond the common wont of boyhood, 
 and were often committed to prison and fined for their 
 misconduct. '' Barrinsi;-out " their masters was a regular 
 institution ; the pupils, well provisioned and armed, held 
 the old schoolhouse in the historic Yards, hard by the Cow- 
 gate Port, to which their long-suffering preceptors laid siege, 
 with varying success. Sometimes that seat of learning was 
 carried by assault, or the garrison, subdued by famine, would 
 surrender and be duly flogged ; sometimes, to the detriment 
 of discipline, the defenders enforced acceptance of their 
 terms, usually a week's holiday. In the general ameliora- 
 tion of manners brought about by the eighteenth century, 
 these academic tumults were commuted to the relatively 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 173 
 
 blameless bickers, of which in the preface to Waverley 
 Scott gives so engaging an account ; but during the 
 enlightened reign of James the Sixth the High School bovs, 
 participating in the general licence of that golden age, 
 pushed their " privilege " so far as to incur a criminal pro- 
 secution before the High Court of Justiciary. The facts 
 as narrated by Birrel in his " Diarey," being strikingly 
 characteristic of the ways of Jacobean Edinburgh, are 
 sufficiently curious to warrant transcription. "The 15 of 
 September [1595], Johne Macmorrane slaine be the shott of 
 ane pistole out of the schooll. This Johne Macmorrane 
 being baillie for the tyme, the bairns of the said gramar 
 schooll came to the tounes counsell [the patrons of that 
 institution] conforme to yair zeirlie custome, to seek the 
 priuiledge, quha wes refusit ; upone the qlk, ther wes ane 
 number of schollaris, being gentelmens bairns, made ane 
 mutinie, and came in the night and tooke the schooll, and 
 prouydit yameselfis wt. meit, drink, and hagbutis, pistolet, 
 and suord : they ranforcit the dores of the said schooll, sua 
 yat yai refusit to let in yr. mr. [master] nor nae uthir man, 
 wtout they wer grantit ther privilege, conforme to yr. 
 wontit use. The Prouost and Baillies and Counsell heiring 
 tell of the same, they ordeinit Johne Macmorrane baillie, 
 to goe to the gramar schooll and take some order yrwt 
 [therewith]. The said Johne, with certein officers, went to 
 the schooll, and requystit the schollaris to opin the doreis : 
 yai refusit. The said baillie and officers took ane geast 
 [joist or beam] and rane at the back dore with the geast. 
 Ane schollar bad him desist from dinging up the dore, 
 utherways, he vouit to God, he wald shute ane pair of 
 buUetis throw hes heid. The said baillie thinking he durst 
 not shute, he, with his assisters, ran still wt. the geast at 
 the said dore. Ther came ane schollar callit William 
 Sinclair, sone to William Sinclair chansler of Catnes 
 [Chancellor of Caithness], and with ane pistolet shott out 
 at ane window, and shott the said baillie throw the heid, 
 sua yat he diet. I'ntlie [presently] the hail tounesmen 
 
174 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 ran to the schooll, and tuik the said bairns and put yame 
 in the tolbuith : hot the haill bairns wer lettin frie wtout 
 hurte done to yame for the same, wtin ane short tyme 
 yairafter." 
 
 There is a gap in the Justiciary Records for the period 
 from 1591 to 1596, so that unfortunately no official account 
 of the prosecution survives, but I find the matter referred 
 to upon the trial in 1612 of a boy named James Middleton, 
 "for the crewall Slauchter of umquhile Clement Mauchane," 
 his comrade, " be streking of him with ane dirk under the 
 schorte ribbis, upon the diaphragma, quhilk is ane noble 
 pairt." Objection was taken to the indictment on the 
 ground that the accused was a minor of fifteen : " Lyk as, in 
 the accident that fell furth be the scolleris of the Grammer- 
 scole of Edinburgh, in slaying of Johnne Mcmorrane, being 
 ane bailzie, and in the execution of his office, this allegeance 
 being proponit in the persute intentit agains thame for the 
 said Slauchter, it was fi'und be Interloquitour of the Judge, 
 in respect of thair minoritie, that thai war nocht doli 
 capaces, and sa wer assoilzeit." To this the Crown replied : 
 " As to the practique allegit betuixt Johnne Mcmorrane and 
 the Chancellor of Caithnes Sone and the rest of the bairnes, 
 quhome the pannell allegis to haif bene persewit for the 
 said Johnne Mcmorranes slauchter, it is certain that all the 
 bairnes that war persewit and accuset for that slauchter 
 war within fourtene yeiris of age ; and thair was na Inter- 
 locutour gevin in that cause, bot the matter was tane up be 
 his Majesties expres Warrand." Further, the prosecutor 
 was able to prove that Middleton was in fact seventeen, 
 so the death penalty was pronounced, though afterwards 
 commuted to voluntary exile for life. 
 
 King James knew Macmorran personally ; he was fond 
 of dining with well-to-do citizens, and attended a few years 
 later a banquet given in the bailie's house in Riddle's Court, 
 a fine example of sixteenth-century domestic architecture, 
 unaccountably spared by the exterminators of our civic 
 treasures, who did not scruple to destroy the palace and 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 175 
 
 oratory of a Catholic Queen to make way for a Free Church 
 hall. His Majesty was early informed of the tragedy ; the 
 Provost himself took the news to Falkland next morning. 
 After a month's confinement in the Tolbooth the youthful 
 malefactors petitioned to be brought to trial, and James was 
 graciously pleased to appoint 1st December as a suitable 
 date for that end. The relative Act of the Privy Council 
 is printed by Steven. Whatever the form of the proceed- 
 ings, it seems that pressure was brought to bear in high 
 quarters by the boys' relatives, who were persons of influence 
 and position, so that the King was persuaded to pardon 
 them. The chief culprit became in course of time Sir 
 William Sinclair of Mey. He married Katharine Ross, 
 daughter of the laird of Balnagowan, a lady who, like him- 
 self, had some experience of judicial procedure, having been 
 implicated in the notorious case of Lady Foulis, " dilatit of 
 certane crymes of Witchcraft," in 1590. 
 
 The long list of these picturesque barbaric happenings 
 is brought to a close in the nineteenth century by an occur- 
 rence at Edinburgh which I here propose to commemorate. 
 The circumstances of the aff"air, as briefly set forth by Sir 
 Robert Christison, an eye-witness, in his Autobiography, 
 were as follows: "One morning in 1838 a knot of street 
 boys at the College gate snowballed the assembling 
 students, who repaid the compliment with interest. Bigger 
 than boys then joined the fray, which led to a change 
 of weapons. 'Jam[qae] fasces et saxa volant.' The 
 conflict soon reached such dimensions as to call for the 
 interposition of the police. But the police interposed on 
 one side only — mistaking their business, which is that of 
 peacemaker, not of partisan. By-and-by the plan they fell 
 upon was to storm the College quadrangle, in which they 
 signally failed. One would suppose that, at this crisis at 
 least, the civic authorities might have bethought them of 
 calling in the aid of the professors, but in place of that they 
 sought the aid of the mob. With their support the quad- 
 rangle was attacked again, and again the assailants were 
 
176 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 repulsed. Night put an end to the combat, which was 
 renewed next morning with increased animosity. Severe 
 injuries were now sustained on both sides. The conflict 
 continued till night again approached ; but, except that 
 a good many bruises were inflicted and some prisoners 
 taken, no impression was made on the defenders of the 
 quadrangle. A bright idea now took possession of the 
 magistrates in command. A wing of the 79th Highlanders 
 was summoned from the Castle, and the quadrangle was 
 carried by four companions of foot, with forty rounds of 
 ball-cartridge in their pouches. The students, retreating 
 to the terraces, cordially cheered the military, but con- 
 tinued in no mood to yield to the police. A professor 
 [Dr. Christison himself] now got leave from the magistrates 
 to address them ; and a few words directed to their 
 common-sense induced them all to retire to their homes. 
 The authorities of the city made so much of this disturb- 
 ance, as to try five chief ofi'enders for riot. But lawyers 
 generally laughed at this device. By the witty counsel 
 for the defence — Mr. Robertson, afterwards on the Bench 
 — the trial was turned into a farce ; and after four [three ?] 
 days' patient hearing, the judge discharged the prisoners. 
 Nevertheless, at a distance, the snow tournament and police 
 scuffle were long looked at as a formidable riot ; and 
 Louis Philippe's Ministers, it was positively alleged, made 
 inquiry whether the row was not part of a general revolu- 
 tionary insurrection among the University students of 
 Europe. The whole afftiir was really nothing else than the 
 natural effervescence of youth, mismanaged by blundering 
 functionaries and an ill-trained constabulary." 
 
 Some time ago, by the kindness of the late Mr. H. B. 
 Irving, whose interest in everything connected with trials 
 was perennial, I acquired a volume of pamphlets relating 
 to the Students' Riot. This collection, once the property 
 of the great " Peter" Robertson and presented by him to his 
 learned friend J. A. Maconochie, includes (l) a report of 
 the judicial proceedings, prepared from the shorthand notes, 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 177 
 
 and revised by the judge and counsel ; (2) " The University 
 Snowdrop : an Appendix to the Great Trial ; containing 
 a selection of Squibs, old and new, descriptive of the Wars 
 of the Quadrangle, and the Consequences thereof; with 
 magnificent Embellishments," consisting of eleven spirited 
 sketches of the chief scenes and characters in the drama, 
 two examples of which are here reproduced ; and (3) twenty - 
 three broad-side ballads, or war songs of the alumni, pub- 
 lished by certain Edinburgh stationers. From this so ample 
 reservoir my facts are drawn. 
 
 On Wednesday, 21st February 1838, Charles John 
 Dalrymple, Alfred Westmacott. John Aikenhead, Robert 
 Scott Skirving, and Edward Kellet, all students of Edin- 
 burgh University, appeared at the bar of the Sheriff Court, 
 charged upon the complaint of the Procurator Fiscal with 
 the crimes of mobbing, rioting, and assault, committed on 
 11th and 12th January, within the precincts of the College 
 and on South Bridge Street. Sheriff - Substitute Adam 
 Urquhart occupied the Bench ; Cosmo Innes, Advocate- 
 Depute, assisted by Archibald Davidson, conducted the 
 prosecution ; Patrick Robertson and Robert Whigham, the 
 defence. 
 
 The youthful prisoners were happy in their choice of 
 senior counsel. Patrick, familiarly "Peter," Robertson was 
 a notable personality at the Scots bar. Rotund and rosy, 
 jovial, wise, and humorous, he was the Andrew Jameson 
 of his day. Not only witty himself, but a source of wit 
 in others, "Peter" is the hero of many a good story, 
 some of which are preserved by Lockhart, by Professor 
 Wilson, and among the choice leaves of The Court of 
 Session Garland. You remember how " Peter," the centre 
 of a circle of unreverend juniors round the fireplace in the 
 Parliament House, saw approaching the high-domed head of 
 the Author of Waverley. " Hush, boys ! " cried he, " here 
 comes old Peveril, I see the Peak." " Ay, ay, man," re- 
 joined Sir Walter, " as weel Peveril o' the Peak ony day 
 
 as Peter o' the Painch." And at the Theatrical Fund 
 
 12 
 
178 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 Dinner in 1827, when Scott dropped his mask of anonymity, 
 he passed a note to "Peter": "Confess something too; 
 why not the murder of Begbie ? " Henry Cockburn often 
 mentions him, but the most lively picture of the man is 
 that given by Lockhart in Peter s Letters, as presiding, vice 
 two presidents retired in the course of the evening either 
 from exhaustion or other cause, at a Burns' Dinner in 1818 : 
 " Once in the chair, there was no fear of his quitting it 
 while any remained to pay homage due to his authority. 
 He made speeches, one chief merit of which consisted 
 (unlike Epic poems) in their having neither beginning, 
 middle, nor end. He sung songs in which music was not. 
 He proposed toasts in which meaning was not. But over 
 everything that he said there was flung such a radiance 
 of sheer mother-wit, that there was no difliculty in seeing 
 the want of meaning was no involuntary want. By the 
 perpetual dazzle of his wit, by the cordial flow of his 
 good humour, but above all by the cheering influence of 
 his broad, happy face, seen through its halo of punch-steam 
 (for even the chair had by this time got enough of the juice 
 of the grape), he contrived to diffuse over us all, for a long 
 time, one genial atmosphere of unmingled mirth. How 
 we got out of that atmosphere, I cannot say 1 remember." 
 Such was the champion whom the students delighted to 
 honour by the title of " Our Glorious Defender." 
 
 The evidence for the prosecution, as given by the magis- 
 trates, police, and selected citizens, tended to throw the 
 whole blame of the disturbances upon the students. The 
 first witness examined was Bailie Grieve — " asinus sed 
 hominus," a student squib proclaims him — whose shop at 
 the corner of Adam Square (the site is now occupied by 
 Chambers Street) adjoined the College on the north. On 
 Thursday, llth January, about 1 p.m. his attention was 
 directed to a riot in front of the College : the street was 
 crowded, snowballs were flying from the stairs and Quad- 
 rangle where the students were assembled, and the windows 
 of the opposite houses were being broken. He remon- 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 179 
 
 Patrick Robektson. 
 {From a Contemporary Drawing hy Professor Edward Forbes. 
 
180 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 strated with the students, but to no effect. At three 
 o'clock a large body of them marched towards the North 
 Bridge. They assembled in front of the Police Office, 
 where those who had been arrested earlier in the day were 
 liberated. Orders were given to the police to attend next 
 morning to prevent a renewal of the disturbance. On 
 Friday the 12th, at 2 p.m., the stairs of the College were 
 "crammed full of students" armed with sticks, "sharpened 
 at the end as if for stabbino;." He again remonstrated 
 with them on the impropriety of their conduct, but his 
 admonitions were received with disrespect. He returned 
 at three o'clock with the Lord Provost and Bailie Sawers ; 
 the Provost addressed the students, who took it "very 
 ill." They held the stairs, the police made repeated baton 
 charges, and at each charge prisoners were taken. The 
 magistrates then adjourned to his (Grieves) shop to consider 
 the situation ; they decided to send for the military, as it 
 was " a dangerous riot," so the Provost and Bailie Sawers 
 went up to the Castle in a coach ; at four o'clock the troops 
 arrived, and quiet was restored. The police were exhausted 
 by their duties in connection with the trial of the Cotton 
 Spinners. " That was the other great trial," interjected 
 " Peter," who had conducted the defence of those worthies 
 on their prosecution before the High Court of Justiciary 
 from 3rd to 11th January, the first day of the College 
 combat. Cross-examined by Mr. Robertson, Bailie Grieve 
 admitted that on Friday the police were sent to protect 
 the students from annoyance by the mob. There were 
 two parties to the quarrel : students and townspeople. The 
 Riot Act was read in the Quadrangle after the soldiers 
 came ; no attempt was made to communicate with the 
 professors. Some of the people were assisting the police. 
 The crowd extended from Adam Square to Drummond 
 Street ; it was doing nothing and was quite peaceable. 
 There was no " intemperance " on the part of the police. 
 
 Lord Provost Forrest — the "Frosty old Fogo " of 
 the ballads — said he saw nothing of the disturbance on 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 181 
 
 Thursday. At 2 p.m. on Friday, hearing that there was 
 
 a riot, he went to the College ; he found a great crowd of 
 
 people in the street, missiles flying from the College, and 
 
 windows crashing every minute. Police and students were 
 
 struggling on the stairs, the former were trying to force 
 
 the gates, which were shut against them. Captain Stuart 
 
 told him his men were exhausted. He then addressed the 
 
 combatants without effect, the tumult rather increasing, 
 
 and after consultation it was determined to summon the 
 
 troops, which he did in person. His Lordship was chaffed 
 
 unmercifully : 
 
 Studentes inquirant, " Si mater sua cognoscit 
 Filium out-esse?" Sed Frosty respondit nihil! 
 
 Cross-examined, the Provost was not aware whether or 
 not he was by virtue of his oftice Rector of the University. 
 It did not occur to him to communicate with the professors 
 before calling in the military. On Thursday afternoon he 
 saw a body of students, 600 strong, parading the North 
 Bridge. "You did not see me walking down at that time, 
 I presume?" asked "Peter"; "sed Frosty respondit nihil." 
 A crowd was expected in the city on account of the Cotton 
 Spinners' trial ; the coaches and canal boats were searched 
 for undesirables from Glasgow. He saw students bleeding 
 and with broken heads ; that, he supposed, was not done 
 by the military. 
 
 Captain Stuart, Superintendent of Police, said that on 
 Thursday a crowd of workmen gathered at the College. 
 He cleared the front of the building. Students were snow- 
 balling the crowd, and some of them were apprehended ; 
 they were liberated the same day. The police were sent 
 the next day to protect the students, who complained of 
 the tradespeople snowballing them. Learning of the riot, 
 he went to the College with an additional force. He found 
 a great crowd, the students holding the gates ; they made 
 a sally with sticks, and a conflict between them and the 
 police ensued. He considered the situation alarming and 
 dangerous to life. The students were driven back to the 
 
182 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 gates and some were arrested. Part of the crowd got into 
 the Quadrangle along with the police. He had to force 
 the gates in order to rescue his men within. Those appre- 
 hended resisted and were hurt ; there were injuries on both 
 sides. As his force was insufficient to quell the riot he 
 concurred in sending for the troops. Throughout, the 
 students were the aggressors, and the behaviour of the 
 police was temperate, "considering." Cross-examined, he 
 saw no impropriety on the part either of police or towns- 
 people. Two of the latter were arrested, one for throwing 
 a stone, another for assaulting a student, but they were 
 "helped off" by the crowd. The people who got into the 
 Quadrangle were assisting the police. They were perhaps 
 over-zealous and crushed forward violently ; some of them 
 had sticks and used them. Thirty-five students were 
 apprehended. The tumult lasted from two till four o'clock. 
 He himself was never in bodily fear. The police had 
 cleared the stairs before the troops came. If the students 
 had stopped resisting the police, the riot would have been 
 at an end. 
 
 Lieutenant Ker said that on Friday the students made 
 a rush from the College and attacked all and sundry with 
 their sticks. He himself was knocked down. The students 
 were driven back ; the police attacked the gates, got in, 
 and took the ringleaders. Professor Christison suggested 
 that his men should be withdrawn from the yard, and as 
 this was being done the students again attacked them. In 
 cross-examination, he admitted that the affair of Thursday 
 was merely a snowball bicker; the sally on Friday began 
 the trouble. The people were favourable to the police and 
 were assisting them to keep the peace. About 100 got 
 into the yard. The snowballing by the crowd did not con- 
 tribute to keeping the peace. No blame attached to anyone 
 but the students, and the general character of the crowd 
 was peaceable. 
 
 Lieutenant Thomson corroborated. Cross-examined, he 
 said that the police behaved with singular moderation and 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 183 
 
 propriety. He saw certain students hurt and bleeding, 
 but had no idea how they came by their injuries. A 
 person named Thomson was poking at the students with 
 an umbrella; he was not arrested, as he was helping the 
 police to keep the peace. On the same principle none of 
 the crowd who struck the students with sticks was taken 
 into custody. The before-cited bard thus commemorates 
 the prowess of this unofficial peacemaker : 
 
 Thomsonus, hullyus in domus ill-famse Cougatus, 
 Armatus umbrello poket Studentes frustra, 
 Umbrella shiverabunt, et Thomson cut like the devil. 
 
 Hugh Paton, " carver and gilder, not glazier," said that 
 the police were defied and obstructed; he considered the 
 behaviour of the students to their fellow-creatures brutal. 
 " Had these fellow-creatures batons or not ? " asked Mr. 
 Robertson ; witness admitted that they had, but said the 
 students struck first. He was told on Thursday by a 
 student named Jones that there would be a worse row 
 next day, as the students were to come with bludgeons 
 to attack the police. 
 
 This closed the first day's proof, in which the prosecutor 
 had things pretty much his own way ; but his next witness, 
 Mr. Hutchison, surgeon, put a different complexion on the 
 matter. Though invited to bless the Crown case, like the 
 prophet Balaam on another occasion, the defence got the 
 benefit of his benediction. He said that for two days before 
 the fracas there was a long slide in front of the College. 
 On Thursday morning a number of apprentices and work- 
 men assembled there. These pelted the students with snow- 
 balls as they were going to their classes. The students 
 complained of ill-usage, and went in procession along the 
 North Bridge to the Police Office. They arranged to bring 
 sticks next day as the police would not protect them. In 
 cross-examination, he said that the students' complaints 
 were well founded ; the crowd prevented them from getting 
 into the College, and assailed them with divers epithets 
 refiecting alike upon their breeding, morality, and political 
 
184 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 tenets. (These opprobrious expressions are discreetly 
 rendered by the learned author already quoted : " damnatos 
 puppies, catamitosque Torios"; the principles of the mob, 
 of course, were purely Whig.) He was frequently at the 
 College, trying to collect the scattered members of his class. 
 On Friday the same thing occurred ; the students were 
 abused by the mob, whom the police made no attempt to 
 disperse. He was refused by an officer admission to the 
 College. Many of the students were cut and bleeding ; 
 those taken prisoner were ill-treated by the crowd. Had 
 the mob been moved on there would have been no trouble. 
 It was largely composed of Tron Church loafers, " usually 
 denominated blackguards." 
 
 John Crearar, whose shop was opposite the College, 
 described what he saw of the fighting ; he could not say 
 who were the aggressors on Friday ; a number of black- 
 guard boys began the trouble on Thursday. 
 
 The next witness was P.C. Alexander Gunn, No. 18, 
 the most unpopular member of the force. A truculent 
 ruffian, who had savagely abused the students, he figures 
 prominently in all the ballads of the battle. " Fire away, 
 Gunn!" was "Peter's" greeting, when this paladin entered 
 the lists. After giving, in chief, the official version of the 
 riot, Gunn's fire was drawn by Mr. Robertson. No snow- 
 balls, he alleged, w^ere thrown at the students except by two 
 small boys, " who dispersed away immediately after." The 
 crowd used neither violence nor improper language ; there 
 never was any rioting on the part of the people and no 
 occasion to remove them. He did not know whether the 
 mob was right or wrong in pushing towards the College. 
 Macdonald, a baker, and others were assisting the police. 
 He could not tell how many students he himself knocked 
 down, whether 10, 20, 50, or 100. He did not remember 
 whether or not he had knocked down a professor : they 
 were all alike " depredators " to him. He had used no 
 abusive language. He did not know how many policemen 
 were on duty that day, perhaps 100 ; the opposing force 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 185 
 
 was 30 times as strong. Whereupon the cross-examination 
 continued as follows : " Do you mean to say there were 
 3000 men armed with sticks against you ? " — " If I had had 
 time to count them I would have been better able to tell 
 you." — "And you expect me to believe that?" — "I don't 
 care whether you believe it or not." — "You were quite cool 
 and collected at the time ? " — " I was cool in my mind, 
 though my body was warm " — an answer which afforded 
 the ballad-makers matter for endless mirth. 
 
 Half-a-dozen lesser satellites of the force told the same 
 tale, and identified the pannels as "depredators"; Macdonald, 
 the baker, who had received Is. lOjd. for assisting to keep 
 the peace with a stick, endorsed the ofticial story ; and Dr. 
 Black, surgeon of police, certified that he had treated two 
 constables for wounds received upon the field of battle. 
 Cross-examined, he admitted attending at the Police Office 
 four students who were severely injured and cut about the 
 head. With the putting in of the prisoners' declarations, 
 which were admitted by Mr. Kobertson, the Crown case 
 closed. 
 
 The evidence for the defence may be more briefly stated, 
 the rather that it entirely exculpates the pannels of the 
 crimes charged. The first two witnesses. Walker and 
 Maclachlan, whose places of business were opposite the 
 College, saw the whole proceedings. They said that the 
 trouble began by workmen snowballing the students, who 
 at first were very patient. Tradespeople, women, and boys 
 participated in the assault. On Friday afternoon a student 
 who was struck in the face ran out to catch his assailant ; 
 he was seized by the police, his friends made a sally to 
 rescue him, and a battle of batons and sticks followed. The 
 crowd and the police began the tulzie ; they were actino- 
 together, such students as were captured were very roughly 
 handled, and the police behaved with unnecessary violence. 
 Had they dispersed the crowd, there would have been an 
 end of the fray. 
 
 Mr. Lawrence Douglas, advocate, said that the students 
 
186 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 were hustled by the mob and had to take refuge in the 
 archways. The mob and the police were clearly acting in 
 concert, the conduct of the latter was unjustifiable through- 
 out, and their treatment of prisoners needlessly severe. 
 
 Captain Jones, R.N., who lived at the corner of 
 Drummond Street, saw workmen assemble at one o'clock on 
 Friday. Some occupied the entries opposite the College. 
 From their appearance and conversation he gathered that 
 they were met for a disturbance : they were armed with 
 bludgeons, and said that they expected " fine fun." At 
 half-past two an armed crowd rushed "in torrents" into 
 the College yard ; some had two hats on, " but only one 
 head each." He tried to stem the rush, but the police 
 refused his aid : their conduct was unjustifiable and dis- 
 graceful. When a student was captured, the behaviour 
 of the mob was of the most savage kind, and nothing 
 was done to repress it. 
 
 Professor Christison, whose appearance in the box was 
 hailed with cheers, said that from his room in the front of 
 the College he watched the Friday's melee. There was 
 a great crowd of workmen. One student ran out towards 
 Drummond Street, others followed in a wedge, the police 
 rushed upon them, and a conflict ensued. He afterwards 
 went out to the Quadrangle, where he found the police and 
 mob, who were acting together, fighting with the students. 
 He sussested to Lieutenant Ker to remove his men and 
 clear the area of the mob, which was partially done. No 
 communication was made by the magistrates to the Univer- 
 sity authorities ; there was nothing to prevent them doing 
 so. When the troops arrived the students withdrew to 
 the terraces ; he addressed them and they dispersed. Some 
 were thereupon apprehended, which they considered unfair. 
 He had a correspondence with Bailie Sawers on the subject, 
 with a view to their being leniently dealt with. These 
 letters were then read by witness ; and a passage in the 
 Bailie's, referring to the students as " a class of young men 
 who, when once they have passed the Ribicon [sic], have 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 187 
 
 shewn themselves to be somewhat troublesome customers," 
 delio"hted the audience, and became an "owercome" of the 
 students' song;s. The lads, continued Dr Christison, acted 
 throughout on the defensive and with 2;reat forbearance ; 
 they were under the impression that the magistrates had 
 no jurisdiction within the College area. Workmen of "a 
 very inflammatory appearance " took part with the police. 
 If the crowd had been dispersed there would have been 
 no disturbance. 
 
 Mrs. Kennedy, whose shop was opposite the College, 
 enjoyed the distinction of being, with the exception of the 
 Provost's mother who had not a speaking part, the only 
 lady in the cast. She saw a student dragged out of the 
 College by the hair and beset by three men, one of whom 
 was a policeman. 
 
 Mr. Eagle Henderson was at the College at 2 p.m. on 
 Friday. The mob and police were attacking the gates, 
 which the students were defending. The police, supported 
 by "blackguards, boys, and carter fellows," rushed the 
 gate. A butcher in a red nightcap led the charge. Such 
 prisoners as were taken were very roughly handled, the 
 police being unnecessarily severe. This closed the second 
 day's proof. 
 
 At the resumed hearing, seven students who had 
 sustaiijed injuries gave their several experiences of the 
 campaign. They proved aggravated assaults by the police 
 and their " concurrents," including a butcher, a baker, a 
 drunk carter, and the umbrelliferous Thomson. Some of 
 the students were rendered insensible by blows, many 
 were wounded, and it appeared that Gunn, " the eighteen 
 pounder," as Mr. Robertson pleasantly termed him, had 
 specially distinguished himself by his ferocity. One student 
 was arrested merely for calling, " Shame ! " when he saw a 
 companion ill-treated. The tale of Paton, the Crown wit- 
 ness, as to the students' preparation for Friday's fight, was 
 denied by the other parties to the conversation. The 
 defence closed with the evidence of the College janitor, who 
 
188 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 on Thursday complained to the police of the mob throwing 
 stones at the gates, but was told to mind his own business ; 
 they refused to arrest the offenders. On Thursday he went 
 to the Police Office to lodge a formal complaint ; he was 
 informed that they had no time to listen to him and that 
 if he persisted, they would take him up ! Later, in the 
 Quadrangle, he was assaulted by a collier with a piece of 
 coal in his hand, who said, " I am a constable ! " and tried 
 to apprehend him. 
 
 The Advocate-Depute then addressed the SheriflF, who 
 sat as judge and jury. The case, he said, was an ordinary 
 Police Court one, and was only brought in that form out of 
 delicacy, to allow the conduct of the police to be discussed. 
 The charge was of mobbing, rioting, and assaulting certain 
 police officers, and persons active in the riot were equally 
 guilty of the separate assaults committed. The attempt to 
 show that the magistrates were terrified and confused had 
 failed, but he admitted that their sending for the troops 
 was a mistake. The evidence of Captain Stuart and his 
 subordinates was unshaken ; no attack had been made on 
 their character or credibility except in the case of Gunn, 
 who might be censured for loss of temper but not for 
 wilful deceit or concealment of the truth — having no 
 precise knowledge on the subject of the questions put to 
 him, he did not choose to favour his interrogator with a 
 conjecture. As to Paton, he might have heard the state- 
 ment he spoke of from someone else and mistaken his 
 informant. Counsel then reviewed the facts of the case : 
 on Thursday, a general snowball bicker, in which the police 
 interfered and were grievously assaulted by the students, 
 and the resolution of the latter to bring sticks next 
 day ; on Friday, a phalanx of students rushing towards 
 Drummond Street, beaten back by the police, and holding 
 against them the gates, which, with the assistance of 
 persons in plain clothes, were forced. No doubt the 
 students thought that the College was their castle and that 
 they were entitled to defend it. As the magistrates could 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 189 
 
 not reach the professors they unwisely sent for the troops. 
 Of course, had the crowd been removed the riot would have 
 ended, but the police had to judge which party was to 
 blame. None of the witnesses for the defence saw the 
 be^inninff of the disturbance, and could neither know who 
 were the aggressors nor the provocation received by the 
 police which palliated what degree of roughness was used. 
 It was immaterial whether or not the magistrates acted 
 prudently, or whether the police executed their orders with 
 discretion ; such proved resistance to authority was im- 
 proper and illegal, and by every principle of law he was 
 entitled to a conviction against all the pannels. 
 
 In contrast to the prosecutor s colourless and half-hearted 
 address the speech for the defence was a psean of victory 
 in which ridicule and righteous wrath were happily com- 
 mingled. Mr. Robertson at the outset observed that this 
 was a case which it was difficult to treat except with scorn 
 and lauohter. Had he had the honour to be Advocate- 
 
 O 
 
 Depute— "which, indeed, I once had, but, alas! only for a 
 very short time " — he would have abandoned at an earlier 
 stage such a preposterous, pitiful, and contemptible pro- 
 secution. " We are here, my Lord, in a court of justice ; 
 we have a libel, we have a judge, we have two Crown 
 lawyers, and we have five prisoners. We have had nine- 
 teen witnesses examined on the one side, and eighteen on 
 the other. We have produced in evidence three ' or thereby ' 
 bludgeons, and we are engaged at the close of the third day 
 in an investigation which my learned friend says ought to 
 have been settled in the Police Court and in a few minutes. 
 He is right. It ought to have so terminated — yes, I say so 
 too — and that by the punishment of the police and the 
 mob." Of the evidence of the only unbiassed witnesses for 
 the Crown, Mr. Hutchison, the surgeon, and Mr. Crearar, 
 the grocer, his learned friend said not one word ; they were 
 important witnesses for the defence. Adding them there- 
 fore to his own list, and deducting students against police- 
 men, he had Professor Christison, Mr. Walker of the Agency 
 
190 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 Office, Mr. Maclaclilan, the bookseller, Mr. Douglas, the 
 advocate, Captain Jones, R.N., and his case was further 
 adorned by the presence of the fair Mrs. Kennedy, the pro- 
 cession appropriately closing with the College janitor. This 
 was a most serious charge which, if tried in another place, 
 might have been followed by transportation ; let them see 
 what were the terms of the indictment. " Whereas, by the 
 laws of this, and every other well-governed realm — " Mr. 
 Innes : "Is that in the indictment?" Mr. Robertson: 
 " No, it is not. It is omitted, and no wonder ; for the 
 present is not a prosecution, I admit, according to the laws 
 of this or any other well-governed realm. Well, then, after 
 naming the students, it goes on to say that they ' have been, 
 all and each, or one or more of them, guilty of the crimes of 
 mobbing and rioting and assault, or one or other of them, 
 actors, actor, or art and part : in so far as, on the 11th day 
 of January, 1838, or about that time, a mob or great number 
 of disorderly and evil-disposed persons did violently and 
 tumultuously assemble ' — that is the poor students, I suppose, 
 goino- to and from their classes — ' and did, within the area 
 and precincts of the College or University of Edinburgh, 
 and on South Bridge Street opposite or near to the said 
 College or University, conduct themselves in a riotous and 
 outrageous manner, to the disturbance of the public peace, 
 and to the terror and alarm of the lieges, and did throw 
 snowballs or other missiles at them ' — that is, at the lieges. 
 But the outrages did not stop here, for these evil-disposed 
 persons also did throw snowballs at ' several carts and 
 carriages passing along or near to the said street, and at 
 the windows and other parts of the houses or shops or other 
 premises in the said street.' That is on the Thursday, 
 and then the same horrible things are charged on the 
 Friday." (I omit, for lack of space, the "laughter" with 
 which each sentence of this passage is punctuated.) After 
 stating the law in regard to mobbing and rioting, as 
 laid down in Alison's Principles of Criminal Law, Mr. 
 Robertson said that all the elements which constitute that 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 191 
 
 crime were lacking. The students were met there for a 
 purpose perfectly lawful, namely, attending their classes ; 
 the extramural mob of Tron Church loafers — those delicate 
 creatures — were not lawfully assembled, and the magistrates 
 and police were bound to disperse them ; therefore, to add 
 to all the absurdities of that exhibition, the Crown had got 
 the wrong prisoners at the bar. Further, the crime must 
 be "to the fear of the lieges." Had any of Her Majesty's 
 subjects stated that he was at all alarmed ? Even Gunn, 
 though "hot in body," was "cool in mind." The Lord 
 Provost suffered no offence, albeit that " some kind inquiries 
 were made respecting the welfare of one who I trust has 
 lived to enjoy the exaltation of her progeny." When he 
 (counsel) asked the witnesses, " Were you in bodily terror ? " 
 they laughed in his face. " Bodily terror from a bicker of 
 the College students ? Come, come, you are a well-known 
 joker, Mr. Peter, but that is coming it too strong ! " Again, 
 Alison instanced "assemblies for purposes nowise illegal, 
 though sometimes contrary to good morals, as football " — 
 he wondered whether the Professor of Moral Philosophy 
 would agree that football was contra honos mores — "cock- 
 fighting, and the like " — which doubtless meant snowballing. 
 Then there must be " a common design." This was not a 
 meal mob, nor an election mob ; it was a mob in search of 
 learning : the students wished to get to their classes, that 
 was the common design. On no ground of law, therefore, 
 could a conviction in that case be secured. AVith regard 
 to the facts, his only difficulty was to know when to stop, 
 for he had everything to say in his clients' favour and 
 could not even imagine anything to be said against 
 them. Having, with characteristic comments, reviewed 
 the evidence with which the reader is already familiar, Mr. 
 Robertson said that the row was begun by the mob and 
 that the police behaved most shamefully. " The towns- 
 people were supported by a police which is the disgrace of 
 this metropolis, the most expensive, I believe, in Europe, 
 and at the same time, as these proceedings have proved, 
 
192 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 the most inellicient and the most brutal." Before the first 
 sally of the students the magistrates, to quell the forth- 
 coming riot, sent for Her Majesty's 79th Regiment of Foot. 
 It was a foolish, a preposterous step. The Provost and the 
 Bailie decided to pass the " Ribicon " ; they went up to the 
 Castle in a hackney coach. They were afraid of Cotton 
 Spinners concealed in canal boats and in the boots of 
 coaches, yet they sent the troops out of the way to quell 
 a college row ! These wiseacres never thought of reading 
 the Riot Act ; but the Procurator-Fiscal, knowing that it 
 was unusual to send for the military before that had been 
 done, put a copy in his pocket and marched down to the 
 College. " The drums are beating and the trumpets are 
 sounding while the Act is reading, in order to quell the 
 riot which the police themselves had created, aided and 
 abetted by their extramural force. For although they 
 were wearied out by the Cotton Spinners' trial, they had 
 able aid : they had the red-capped butcher, and the super- 
 numerary baker with his Is. lOjd., neither more nor less, 
 for one night's service. They had the drunken carter, they 
 had the chairmaker with his umbrella poking about, and 
 they had a collier dug up for the occasion. I trust 1 may 
 say without ofience that he is one of the loiver orders. 
 They had all this aid, and they were struggling — to do 
 what? They were struggling to force open the College 
 gates, in order that this ferocious mob and still more 
 ferocious police might get at the students who were only 
 doing what was lawful. They never thought of dispersing 
 the mob which was doing what was unlawful — oh, no ! — 
 but they gently put them back : ' Adieu, they cried, and 
 waved their lily hands.' They returned, however, again to 
 the charge. ' Come on,' quoth the butcher ; ' Strike hard,' 
 quoth the baker ; ' I'm a constable,' quoth the collier, with 
 a bit of diamond as his badge of office ; ' Remember my old 
 horse,' quoth the carter ; ' Follow me, I hope I don't 
 intrude,' quoth Paul Pry with his umbrella. And before 
 all this had taken place, before all this scene of blood, of 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 193 
 
 desolation and dismay, the Lord Provost, with Bailies 
 Sawers and Grieve, are coolly sitting in the latter's shop, 
 whence, after solemn deliberation, they send for the 
 military to quell that disturbance which was owing to their 
 own stupidity, the ferocity of the mob, and the mingled 
 absurdity and brutality of the police ! " He did not suggest 
 perjury on the part of Paton, who was merely a timid 
 blockhead and had dreamed of bludgeons ; yet it was the 
 stupidity and fear of this one man which had prevailed on the 
 Provost and Bailie Sawers to pass the " Ribicon." The Cotton 
 Spinners' trial was a tragedy ; this was a farce. But the 
 farce had its serious aspect. Were students to be insulted 
 in this way with impunity ? Was the University to be 
 thus disgraced ? Were the inhabitants to be taxed for a 
 police to beat out the brains of the students of Edinburgh ? 
 He called for an inquiry, he called for proceedings against 
 the police, and as a citizen and a gentleman he publicly 
 declared that the matter ought to be thoroughly investi- 
 gated. Every one of the unbiassed witnesses swore that 
 the police were acting in concert with the crowd and 
 against the students. "That impudent blackguard Gunn 
 — for blackguard I do call him — who did not know whether 
 the police establishment consisted of 100 or 1000 men, who 
 did not know whether he had knocked down 10 or 50 men, 
 who struck the blows, I doubt not, that laid some of these 
 young gentlemen on a bed of sickness — he would bully me at 
 this table, and would presume to talk before this Court in the 
 manner he did ; and yet would have you believe that the 
 evidence he gave was trustworthy." In a moving perora- 
 tion Mr. Robertson besought his clients when they were 
 dismissed from the Bar, as he was convinced they would be, 
 to bear their triumph modestly, and by orderly conduct 
 and attention to their studies to show the authorities that 
 they could exhibit that noblest sentiment of the human 
 heart, forgiveness for wrongs received ; and when the excite- 
 ment had passed away, which was not caused by them but 
 by the folly and recklessness of others, they would have the 
 
 13 
 
194 THE LAST TULZIE 
 
 satisfaction of knowing that on their side they had 
 acted an honourable part, and had done nothing incon- 
 sistent with that dignity and high honour a deep sense 
 of which he trusted the Scottish youth would always 
 cherish. 
 
 When the loud and long-continued cheering which 
 followed these remarks had subsided, the Sheriff pronounced 
 judgment. His Lordship observed that in trying the case 
 without a jury he was placed in the invidious position of 
 having to determine both as to the law and the credibility 
 of the evidence. In regard to the proceedings of Thursday, 
 he was satisfied that there was no evidence upon which the 
 first charge could be maintained. On Friday the magistrates 
 sent the police "to protect the students." From the 
 evidence of Captain Jones it was quite clear that a body of 
 workmen, armed with sticks, were employed by the police, 
 and that other persons so armed occupied the entrances and 
 doorways opposite the College. These preparations were 
 not for a mere snowball bicker. The students also had 
 sticks, but they had a perfect right to go to the College 
 and the people had no right to be loitering there. Their 
 demeanour and language convinced Captain Jones that 
 these persons were preparing for a fray. As the police 
 ofticers were not upon their trial his Lordship would not 
 comment on their conduct, whatever opinion he might have 
 formed of it ; but the violence to prisoners proved against 
 the policemen was certainly culpable in a very high degree, 
 and the behaviour of the mob was disgraceful. The snow- 
 balls thrown at the students by those who had already 
 exasperated them, which led to the sally, was the first 
 aggression ; after that, the police regarded the mob as 
 friends and supporters, and their joint energies were 
 directed against the students. Any damage done to property 
 being over, the police were not justified in forcing them- 
 selves, mixed with members of the mob, into the College 
 yard. The first provocation was not given by the students, 
 and consequently not by the accused. His Lordship there- 
 
THE LAST TULZIE 195 
 
 fore found the panuels not guilty, and dismissed them 
 simpliciter from the Bar. 
 
 So ended, in the triumphant acquittal of the 
 "depredators," the last action in that notable campaign, 
 which, if it redounded but scantly to the wisdom of the 
 City Fathers and the humanity of the ostensible preservers 
 of the peace, at least afforded the citizens three days' 
 amusement and inspired to entertaining purpose the song- 
 ful sons of Alma Mater. Not all their strains are admir- 
 able ; but the dog- Latin fragment in the Virgilian manner, 
 so often quoted in this paper, entitled Frosteidos and 
 commencing : 
 
 Frosty policeque cano, Reekie qui primus ab office 
 In High Street, ad College veniebant quellere riot, 
 
 is a worthy pendant to the racy jeu desjyrit of Drummond 
 which furnishes my inceptive tag. 
 
 The students' witty champion, who five years later as 
 Lord Robertson ascended the supreme Bench, was less 
 happy than his clients when he himself adventured upon 
 the perilous seas of poesy. Lockhart appended by way of 
 epitaph to a review in the Quarterly of his Lordship's 
 volume of reprehensible verse. Gleams of Thought reflected 
 from Milton, etc., the following pungent distich : 
 
 Here lies that peerless paper peer, Lord Peter, 
 Who broke the laws of God and man and metre. 
 
 It is recorded of "Peter" that he waxed exceeding wroth. 
 This probably was the sole occasion on which that genial 
 jester failed to see the joke ; but the man was mortal, and 
 had written a book. 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF 
 LINLITHGOW 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 Thou canst not slave 
 Or banish nie ; I will be free at home, 
 Maugre the bearde of greatnesse. 
 
 — Antonio's Revenge. 
 
 THIS title is not my own ; neither is it taken, as might 
 appear, from one of Lord Dunsany's delicate and 
 fantastic tales. It properly belongs to a curious scarce old 
 pamphlet by a learned scholar and grammarian, Mr. James 
 Kirkwood, in which he sets forth at length the story of the 
 " weel kenn'd " plea so long depending between himself and 
 his patrons, the Provost, Magistrates and Council of Lin- 
 lithgow, together with the manifold and grievous wrongs 
 sustained by him at the hands of that unconscionable 
 Corporation. There are in fact two accounts of this 
 memorable business, issued by Kirkwood in his own 
 defence: (1) "A Short Information of the Plea betwixt 
 the Town Council of Lithgow and Mr. James Kirkwood 
 School-Master there, Whereof a more full Account may 
 perhaps come out hereafter " ; and (2) " The History of the 
 Twenty-Seven Gods of Linlithgow : Being an exact and 
 true Account of a Famous Plea betwixt the Town- Council 
 of the said Burgh and Mr. Kirkwood Schoolmaster there. 
 Seria Mixta Jocis . . . Edinburgh, Printed in the Year 
 MDCCXI," in which the promise of the earlier tract is 
 amply fulfilled. 
 
 The author himself disclaims responsibility for his title. 
 In an "Advertisement" printed on the back of it he says : 
 "Pray, good Peader, do not stumble at the odd kind of 
 
 190 
 
200 THE TWENTY- SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 Title given this Book : It not being Mr. Kirkwood's Con- 
 trivance, but what the Members of the Town-Council 
 assume to themselves, as you'll see elsewhere " — which we 
 shall in due course do. Of the fuller account of the affair 
 he remarks that it "well deserves to be intitul'd Tlie 
 Histoiy of the tiventy-seven Gods of Lithgow ; wherein you 
 shall see such ridiculous and droll Stuff', such wild and 
 extravagant Acts, such cruel and illegal Pranks, that tho' 
 you made search into the whole Records of all the Burghs 
 in this Kingdom from their first erection to this day, you 
 shall not meet with any thing that can parallel this." 
 That it were idle to set bounds to the folly and wickedness 
 of mankind in general and of Town Councils in particular, 
 lovers of Old Edinburgh, lamenting the civic vandalism of 
 which she has been the victim, would be the last to deny ; 
 but Mr. Kirkwood's claim for the unique and pre-eminent 
 villainy of his municipal oppressors may be admitted. The 
 story, he further observes, " looks liker a Romance than a 
 Law plea, and would be no ill Subject for a Comedie, if it 
 could end well " ; and of a truth it does form a most divert- 
 ing interlude in the dour ecclesiastical drama of which 
 
 o 
 
 Scotland was so long the theatre. Unluckily the powers 
 responsible for the production of the piece forbade a happy 
 ending : Virtue indeed was vindicated, but Vice remained 
 practically triumphant and unpunished. 
 
 From the flight of King James in December 1688 to the 
 establishment of Presbyterianism in June 1690, known in 
 history as the Revolution period, the affairs of the Kirk in 
 Scotland were, even for them, in a state of more wild con- 
 fusion than usual. The Abbey Church at Holyrood was 
 plundered ; and the " rabbling of the Curates," as described 
 by Patrick Walker, the biographer of the Saints of the 
 Covenant, soon showed the Episcopal clergy what they had 
 to look for at the hands of their Presbyterian brethren. 
 The position of an established minister must at that date 
 have implied a very insufficient sense of stability. It is in 
 the early stages of those turbulent doings that the incidents 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 201 
 
 with which we are concerned took place. The popular 
 belief in the immense preponderance of the Presbyterian 
 element at the time has been well described as an interested 
 and modern assumption. Dr. Alexander Carlyle, the genial 
 minister of Inveresk, himself admits " that when Presbytery 
 was re-established in Scotland at the Revolution, after the 
 reign of Episcopacy for twenty-nine years, more than two 
 thirds of the people of the country, and most part of the 
 gentry, were Episcopals." (a) 
 
 A notable exception to his class was one Walter Steuart 
 of Pardovan, in the county of Linlithgow, a gentleman of 
 views violently Presbyterian, and the author of an 
 exhaustive (and exhausting) treatise touching the worship, 
 discipline and government of the Kirk. (6) His was the 
 moving spirit in the Linlithgow Town Council, and when 
 we first make his acquaintance he was about to be elected 
 Provost of the burgh. A young man for so considerable 
 an office, he had received his early education in the local 
 grammar school at the hands of Mr, James Kirkwood. 
 Whether or not the dominie had spared the rod, it is clear 
 that Pardovan was a spoilt child. 
 
 Since 1674 Mr. Kirkwood had held the post of school- 
 master at Linlithgow, bestowed upon him by the then 
 Town Council. At the time of his appointment he was 
 " Governour to my Lord Bruce," son of the Earl of 
 Kincardine, at the College of Glasgow, where he lodged 
 with Dr. Burnet, then Professor of Divinity there, and 
 afterwards the celebrated Bishop of Sarum. Kirkwood was 
 a scholar of repute, "being Famous for his special skill in 
 Teaching Youth, particularly by his framing and publishing 
 a new Latin Grammar (c) and E/hetorick,((i) very much 
 approved by most of all the Learned Men of this Kingdom," 
 
 (a) Autobiography, 1860, p. 249. 
 
 (b) Collections and Observations Methodiz\l . . . in Four Books. Edinburgh, 
 1709. 
 
 (c) Granimatica Despauteriana cum nova novi generis glossa. 
 
 {d) Ehetoricw Oompcndium, ciii siibjicittir de Analyst Tractatuucula. 
 
202 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 and it "was not without " very much entreaty and good 
 offers" that he was prevailed upon to accept the duty of 
 giving the young of Lithgow the benefit of his experience. 
 He was most particular as to the conditions of his service, 
 refusing to be " stinted " or limited as regards its duration ; 
 and he was admitted " in general and absolute terms, as 
 all Professors of Liberal Arts use to be, implying Ad 
 Vitam vel Culpam, as his Act of Admission bears." A 
 yearly salary of 400 merks was the measure of his 
 remuneration. So for fourteen years he continued to 
 discharge his functions " to the great satisfaction of that 
 place, living inoffensively without the least shadow of any 
 stain, and duly receiving all the Emoluments and Profits " 
 pertaining to his office. 
 
 But, alas, when King James so inconsiderately cast 
 away his crown he also disposed, among other things 
 more momentous, of the poor schoolmaster's peace of mind. 
 Among the minor consequences of the Revolution was the 
 turning out of the Jacobite Town Council, their place being 
 taken by Presbyterian Whigs of the deepest religious and 
 political dye. Kirkwood was something of a rare bird in 
 those days : a broad-minded tolerant man, of moderate 
 principles in Church matters, as became his philosophic 
 calling. Though himself adhering to the Episcopal Church 
 of Scotland as by law established, he tells us that " he 
 blames no Man for being of this or that Opinion, especially 
 in Things that are of themselves not simply necessary to 
 a Christian Life ; and craves the like Favour of them : 
 Humbly judging private Persons are to keep within their 
 Sphere, and for Peace's sake to submit to many things and 
 to comply with them, tho' inconvenient in their Judgment, 
 yet not sinful, such as are most of these Things which make 
 so great Stir in this Kingdom and destroy the very Life of 
 Christianity, which consisteth in Sobriety, Justice and 
 Devotion ; but these are eaten up and consumed by the 
 Unchristian Management and Prosecution of small and 
 inconsiderable Difterences. We tithe Mint and Cummin, 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 203 
 
 and omit the main and absolutely necessary Duties of 
 our Religion." These sentiments, however praiseworthy, 
 proved highly unpalatable to the new authorities, who, in 
 Kirkwood's phrase, " being all Biggotly Presbyterian," had 
 scant sympathy with such views, and determined to punish 
 their exponent by forcing him from ofEce and depriving 
 him of his means of livelihood. 
 
 On 12th April 1689 the pious and purified Town 
 Council "sent in a most tumultuous Manner a Party of 
 Musqueteers" to command the two parish ministers to 
 remove from their charge, " that they might place better 
 in their Room." Until possession of the parish church (a) 
 could be obtained it was arranged that the true evangel 
 should be preached " in the Provost's (6) own Kitchin " ; and 
 on the following day Pardovan " in a A^ery magisterial 
 manner" intimated to Mr. Kirkwood that unless he 
 attended these extra-mural lectures " he should not be 
 long Schoolmaster in Lithgow." Mr. Kirkwood very 
 properly replied that he had " no freedom " to go to their 
 meeting-house — probably he deemed the venue savoured 
 more of digestive than of devotional exercises. " He 
 refused to forsake the publick Place of Worship till either 
 the Convention of Estates that was newly sit down, or the 
 then ensuing Parliament, should make a change in the 
 Government [of the Church]." In whatever alteration 
 might so be made he was prepared to acquiesce, "for he 
 thinks it his Duty to follow, and not to run before the 
 Laws in these matters." There was certainly nothing 
 restrictive in his religious opinions. "He can hear 
 Presbyterian, Episcopal, Papist, yea, a Turk or Heathen 
 make a good discourse," but at that juncture he was sure 
 that his going to the meeting-house would give offence to 
 many on both sides ; " some were already stumbling to see 
 him so frequently conversing with the Provost, and he can 
 
 (a) The venerable Gothic Chapel of St. Michael, in which James the Fourth 
 received supernatural warning of the di,-a.ster awaiting him at Flodden. 
 (6) Pardovan was then Provost designate. 
 
204 THE TWENTY-SEVEN" GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 instance them that cry'd to him in the High Street, ' Turn 
 Coat, Turn Coat ! ' " Those who did so were strangely 
 ill-informed as to their fellow-townsman's character. 
 
 A fortnight later Pardovan was elected Provost. He 
 at once sent for the schoolmaster and urged him to attend 
 the meeting-house on the ensuing Sabbath, " to counten- 
 ance his Lordship's first Entry there " ; but Mr. Kirkwood 
 declined. To do so would be, he said, to forsake all his 
 own friends and learn a new language ; to abandon the 
 form of worship " establish'd by the supreme Powers of the 
 Nation and go to a private Meeting-House (Pardovan's 
 own Kitchin), then only connived at or at most tolerated, 
 neither Threats nor Allurements can prevail with him." 
 Pardovan used all methods and arguments to persuade 
 him to forsake the Church, " thinking if he left it many 
 would follow his Example. Frequent communing they 
 had about it, but all in vain." Finding him so firm the 
 Provost lost his temper, of which he appears to have had 
 imperfect control ; " You have," said he, " the most 
 malignant Spirit of any Breathing, and ought not to be 
 conversed with." This " in a great liage and Passion, on 
 the High Street, and in view of many People." 
 
 The magisterial vengeance was first manifested by the 
 Provost advising divers persons of quality to withdraw 
 their children from the school, in which spiteful scheme, 
 owing to the pusillanimity or sectarian bias of the parents, 
 he was partially successful. His next step was to quarter 
 on Mrs. Kirkwood, in her husband's absence " in time of 
 School Vacance," four men and four horses, although none 
 of the neigfhbourinpc households had a single soldier billeted 
 upon it. "Had Mr. Kirkwood been at Home, he would 
 have given them a better Stable in the middle of his 
 School, and he was sure to furnish them with as many old 
 Theams and Grammars as their Horses could eat several 
 Months." These measures failing signally to subdue the 
 dominie's spirit, the Provost and Council on 12th October 
 " made an Act, reducing his Salary from 400 to 300 Merks 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 205 
 
 a Year." This they did, not only without his consent, but 
 without his knowledge, the formal agreement between the 
 parties being treated, more Germanico, as a scrap of paper. 
 On 19th October the Provost sent for Mr. Kirkwood and 
 intimated to him the Council's decision. "If you will 
 not submit to it," said he, "you must flit and remove." 
 "That's another Question," replied the schoolmaster, and 
 a vexed one indeed it was to prove. Next day two of the 
 Bailies called upon him " to see if they could make up the 
 Peace." As the parties were coming to "a good Agree- 
 ment" the Provost burst in upon their deliberations. 
 "Master Kirkwood," said he, "you cannot but acknow- 
 ledge that you are exceedingly obliged to the good Town, 
 having gained in it all you are worth ; and therefore you 
 ought to do nothing that may any way tend to its Dis- 
 advantage." The dominie returned a dignified answer. 
 " That I am obliged to the good Town I will never deny, 
 for I have met with very much Kindness from all that I 
 have had to do with. Yet I hope you will give me leave 
 to say the Obligation betwixt the Town and me is 
 reciprocal. I am obliged to it, so it is to me ; and if I 
 have gain'd any thing 'tis with the Sweat of my Brows in 
 a most honest and lawful manner." So far from owing to 
 the burgh everything he possessed, he pointed out that he 
 had "a tolerable good Portion" from his parents, "got 
 considerably " with his wife, and to say nothing of other 
 services, came from a very honourable and profitable one 
 in Lord Kincardine's family, where he gained both gold 
 and silver. " So you see," he concluded, " I came not to 
 this Place like a Beggar, as your Words import." To 
 which the Provost rudely retorted, " You would rake Hell 
 for the 100 Merks we have taken from your Salary." 
 After some further expressions of magisterial tact and 
 delicacy " they parted not very good Friends." That 
 night Pardovan wrote to Edinburgh for a new school- 
 master ; and next day " one Mr. Binny " came from the 
 capital, who on 26th October was "settled Schoolmaster 
 
206 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 by an Act of Council, and Mr. Kirkwood ordained to 
 remove at Martinmas then next." 
 
 On another occasion the Provost, in face of the Council, 
 called Mr. Kirkwood " Sirrah," and " cry'd with a loud Voice, 
 ' Hurry him out, hurry him out ! ' " "I taught you English, 
 Latin and some Greek," rejoined the dominie, " and now 
 'tis not amis I teach you some Morals also. It would seem 
 your Lordship has forgot that Saying of the Heathen 
 Philosopher, Honor est in honorante." 
 
 Mr. Kirkwood continuing unshaken by these official 
 thunders, the Council passed an Act of Amerciament, 
 whereby they fined him in 200 merks as being " A Reviler 
 of the Gods of his People." " By Gods," he explains, " they 
 mean the 27 Members of the Town Council, the Provost, 
 Four Bailies, Dean of Guild, Treasurer, Twelve Counsellors, 
 Eight Deacons ; so that the Websters, Sutors and Taylors 
 in Lithgow are Gods, forsooth ! They alledging {for Mr. 
 Kirkwood positively denies it) he said, ' The Town Council 
 may think shame of their Actings.' " No doubt Mr. 
 Kirkwood was properly punished for his folly if he in 
 fact deemed the magistrates capable of contrition. On 11th 
 November they sent their officers to the school, " and most 
 violently extorted the Key from him"; on the 16tb they 
 summoned him to remove out of his house. " A very 
 seasonable Time indeed, in the Cold of Winter, betwixt 
 Terms to ffit with a Family of many young Children." 
 This did "a little chaff him," and made him think upon 
 "some Remedy for these Evils." He had too just ground 
 to appeal from them, who were both judge and party, to a 
 more impartial judicature. He therefore went to Edin- 
 burgh, where, having obtained legal advice, he presented 
 to the Court of Session a Bill to suspend the Act depriving 
 him of office, another to advocate (review) the cause of 
 removing from his house, and a third to suspend the Act 
 anent the fine. Thus were well and truly laid the founda- 
 tions of the great cause of Kirkwood v. The Gods of 
 Lithgow, which might have been cited as a precedent for 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN" GODS OF LINLITHGOW 207 
 
 the more famous but less flagrant case of Peebles v. Plain- 
 stanes. What sort of temple was raised thereon to Justice 
 we shall see in the sequel. 
 
 To show the kind of men with whom he was contending, 
 Mr. Kirkwood gives many instances of municipal unwisdom 
 and extravagance for which I have no space, but his fore- 
 cast of the entertainment provided in his longer tract is 
 sufficiently quotable. " Here you'l see one Baily causing 
 drag another to Prison for words that had past betwixt 
 themselves at Court ; and he breaking Prison, is hal'd to 
 it again by his own Officer to the great amazment and 
 laughter of hundreds of People. Here you may read how 
 one Baily calls two in face of Council, ' Perjur'd Villains 
 and Knaves.' Here you'l see some Burgesses, even of the 
 best rank in the Burgh, staged for not taking off their Cape 
 when they past by the Provost in the street, tho' standing 
 at a tolerable distance ; others, for taking it off and making 
 too low a leg. In a word, innocent, harmless, dumb Beasts 
 do not escape their fury, for Baily Turnbul shut up in closs 
 Prison within the Tolbooth a poor man's horse a night and 
 a good part of two days, for tasting a little of the grass in 
 the Churchyard, himself being Jaylor, not daring commit 
 the keys to an Officer, positively refusing to let the poor 
 man give his own horse a peck of draff that he had brought 
 for his supper." Such examples of sweet reasonableness 
 are indeed enlightening with reference to the treatment 
 later meted out to Mr. Kirkwood. 
 
 After the cause had been several times debated at the 
 bar, the Lords found that the Town could not remove him 
 either from his charge as schoolmaster or from his house 
 " at that Time, upon that Ground, and after that Manner," 
 as their interlocutor of 12th December more fully bears. 
 Next day the Town presented a petition desiring a new 
 hearing on other grounds, which was granted. The point 
 the Town had to prove was that Mr. Kirkwood did demit 
 or quit his charge, and the Court had found that his refusal 
 to serve upon a diminution of salary was no demission. At 
 
208 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 the next hearing Mr. Stewart,(a) counsel for the Town, 
 adduced two fresh arguments in support of his contention : 
 
 (1) that Kirkwood took leave of his scholars and exhorted 
 them to be obedient and submissive to their new master ; 
 
 (2) that he went into the school and welcomed that gentle- 
 man " by taking him by the Hand, and wishing him all Joy 
 and Happiness in his Charge." These allegations *' made 
 Mr. Kirkwood's Advocates look one to another " ; but being 
 matters of fact, he felt he was the fittest man to answer 
 for himself. He therefore solemnly assured the Court that 
 the statements were " meer Falsehoods and Lies, contrived 
 to carry on an unjust Cause." And plainly any such 
 congratulation of his successor, if offered, could in the 
 circumstances only have been intended as ironical. " Mr. 
 Stewart," said my Lord Aberuchill,(6) "speaks as he is 
 informed." " I'm sorry," replied Mr. Kirkwood, " that such 
 Liformers should be our Reformers." So the Lords con- 
 firmed their previous interlocutor, and suspended the fine, 
 " which before, upon a Mistake " had been decided in the 
 Town's favour. Thus in the first round the dominie was 
 completely victorious. 
 
 The next creation of the Provost's fancy was " a deep 
 Design or (to give it a more proper Name) a hellish Plot," 
 contrived by him against the schoolmaster " to prove him 
 Perjur'd, and thereby to make him Infamous for ever." He 
 was cited before the Council to hear the members judicially 
 declare that he did " demit his Charge in Face of the 
 Council without Qualification," and had therefore sworn 
 falsely before the Lords at Edinburgh. Some of the coun- 
 cillors hedged : " they did not distinctly remember " ; but 
 the majority supported the Provost, and the finding became 
 that of the whole. On 25th December they passed a new 
 Act ordaining Mr. Kirkwood to remove at Candlemas : 
 
 (a) Later Lord Advocate Sir James Stewart, popularly known as "Wily 
 Jamie " on account of his Lordship's singularly ingenious methods, professional 
 and political. 
 
 (b) Sir Colin Campbell, appointed a judge at the Revolution. 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 209 
 
 "Thus, when others were making merry with their fat 
 Goose Pyes and delicate Dishes, poor Kirkwood was amused 
 with terrible Threats." The dominie promptly sought 
 suspension in the Court of Session ; and the cause having 
 been several times debated before Lord Philiphaugh, (a) 
 his Lordship on 28th January 1690 ordered both parties to 
 lodge informations or written pleadings, when he would 
 report upon it. This order was duly implemented by Mr. 
 Kirkwood ; but the Town — " O Treachery, O Treachery 1 
 Treachery in its highest degree " — instead of lodging their 
 information presented a petition for a new hearing before 
 report. This the Lords, "suspecting no Deceit," allowed, 
 but in the meantime " discharged any Execution to be used 
 against the Suspender." That long-suffering litigant's 
 mind was thus comparatively at ease, but he reckoned, as 
 we shall see, without his Provost. 
 
 The debate began on Tuesday 4th February, and 
 immediately it was over Mr. Kirkwood received from his 
 wife a letter informing him that the magistrates had on 
 the 3rd forcibly ejected herself, her children and servants 
 from his house. The lady wrote in French, and "so 
 scrimply and overly" that it did not clearly appear 
 whether the outrage had actually taken place or was only 
 " minted " (aimed at), Kirkwood at once showed the 
 letter to Lord Philiphaugh, who summoned both parties 
 to the bar. The Lord Advocate (the Master of Stair) (b) 
 and Mr. Stewart represented the Town ; Sir Patrick 
 Hume,(c) Commissary Dalrymple (c?) and Mr. Wilham 
 Mony penny appeared for the schoolmaster. His counsel 
 "immediately fall upon the Points," challenging the 
 Town's proceedings as the height of injustice, "an 
 exceeding great Contempt of Authority, and an unparallel- 
 
 (o.) James Murray, appointed an ordinary Lord of Session in 1689. 
 
 (b) Sir John Dalrynijile, eldest son of Lord President Stair, and afterwards 
 first Earl of Stair. 
 
 (c) Of Polwarth, the friend of Pope, Swift, and Arbuthnot. 
 
 {(I) Sir He\v^ Dairy mple of North Berwick, third son of Lord Stair, who 
 succeeded his father as President of the Court of Session. 
 
 14 
 
210 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 able Instance of a treacherous and deceitful Dealino; with 
 the Lords." Stewart denied all knowledge of the Council's 
 action, and said it was "a mere Calumny." The Lord 
 Advocate, however, admitted that if it were true his clients 
 had "hugely prejudiced" their case — "and so went from 
 the Bar." Cn the 6th, the cause having been reported, 
 the Lords sent it back to the Lord Ordinary " to discuss 
 the Reasons of Suspension upon the Bill " — which one 
 would think had already been siifficiently done — and 
 meanwhile stopped all further execution. The points 
 remaining for discussion were, says Mr. Kirkwood, 
 " Whether or not 'tis in the Town's Power to lessen his 
 Salary ; Whether they can deprive him of his Office, with- 
 out a Fault, giving him a fair and legal Warning? etc." 
 
 He was anxious to know before returning to Linlithgow 
 "if now there was any Hazard from the Town"; but the 
 several Lords of Session, Advocates, Clerks and Writers 
 whom he consulted "all with one Voice said there was no 
 Ground or Cause of Fear." Still, to make assurance 
 doubly sure, he waited upon Lord Philiphaugh, and asked 
 for a protection under his Lordship's own hand. " ' 'Tis 
 not the Custom,' replied my Lord, ' nor is there any need 
 to give such a Paper ; I assure you, Mr. Kirkwood, they 
 dare not meddle with you.' 'My dear Lord,' said Mr 
 Kirkwood, ' I know them People better than your Lord- 
 ship ; Ignorance, Malice and Fury, what dare they not do ? 
 They are truly turn'd mad and distracted because I have 
 hitherto carried the Plea. A Paper, my Lord, under your 
 Hand, questionless, if anything can do it, will put a stop 
 to their Bage. Grant me this one Bequest for God's sake.' " 
 So the judge good-naturedly gave him the order he 
 required, and with this in his pocket the dominie set out 
 for home, his heart considerably lightened. 
 
 On his arrival there on 8th February Mr. Kirkwood 
 duly intimated his " protection " to the Council. He found 
 his family reinstated ; the ejectment, which had been 
 carried out at sight of Bailie Higgins, as explained to Mrs. 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 211 
 
 KIrkwood by that dignitary, was merely a legal fiction : 
 they were thrust out of doors, but nothing was done to 
 hinder their return. " () Heavens ! Earth ! " exclaims 
 the schoolmaster, "We must use, says he, the Formality 
 of Law ; and yet at the very Minute the Word is warm in 
 his Mouth he is trampling both Law and Gospel under his 
 Feet, he goes over the Belly of Law, and certainly acts 
 contrary to the Dictats of his own Conscience," being well 
 aware of the terms of the Lords' interlocutor. 8oon after- 
 wards, this legal formalist " retired into Holy Orders, and 
 was settled Minister of the Gospel, some place in 
 Tweedale" — the re-established Kirk at first found some 
 difiiculty in obtaining a suitable pulpit supply, as this 
 singular appointment proves — "What his Carriage has 
 been since, is out of our Road to enquire." 
 
 Now the technical tactics of Bailie Higgins had afforded 
 no satisfaction to the Provost's more practical mind. So 
 soon as he learned that Mr. Kirkwood had come home he 
 " caus'd ring the Council-Bell," and after a brief conference 
 with his colleagues, despatched four officers to the 
 dominie's abode with the view of giving substance to the 
 bailie's fiction. The magisterial myrmidons "in a most 
 violent manner break up the Chamber-door wherein he was, 
 and first take tlie Keys out of his Pocket and then drag 
 himself. Wife and Six young Children most barbarously 
 down Stairs. Mr. Kirkwood, thinking to save himself by 
 laying Hands on the Horns of the Altar (for indeed a 
 Man's own House is his Sanctuary), claspt his Arms closely 
 round about the Stoup of a Bed ; but these rude fellows 
 tug'd so lustily that had he not quickly let go his grip, 
 they had certainly carried away the Trunck of his Body. 
 Thus Mr. Kirkwood in a Moment's Time was made poorer 
 than Job, for he still kept his House and had something to 
 satisfy Hunger ; but Mr. Kirkwood could not come by one 
 Crum, as you shall presently hear." 
 
 Even more grievous was the case of his wife. Bare- 
 footed and clad only in her " Night-Cloaths," the poor 
 
212 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 woman, who was then in a delicate state of health, was 
 flung into the street, the ruffians refusing to let her put 
 on her shoes or " cast any loose cloath about herself" So 
 great a shock did she sustain by reason of this ill-usage 
 that the mere sight of these officers ever after caused her 
 extreme terror, " albeit her Husband used all the Rhetorick 
 he was Master of to discover the folly of that Passion ; 
 so that at last he was forced to send her to Edinburgh." 
 The lady, he points out, might have looked for better 
 treatment at Pardovan's hands, she being herself of gentle 
 blood, and her brother, Captain Van Beest, of Colonel 
 Ramsay's regiment, having " behaved so well at Killi- 
 chranky." This hero's name is pleasantly reminiscent of 
 Guy Mannering. One of the children, who had long been 
 ailing and was " so extenuated that it would have pitied 
 an Heart of Stone to see her sit by the Fire-side," was 
 cast out " to bath in the frosty Air of the cold Winter," 
 the mother not being suffered so much as to wrap her' in a 
 blanket. The child soon afterwards died, and its blood 
 was surely on the Provost's head. 
 
 Mr. Kirkwood, meanwhile, was dragged off to the 
 Tolbooth, and shut up in a cell along with a minor male- 
 factor, then in duress. His wife besought the magistrates 
 to let her have some food and clothing from her own house, 
 but this they flatly refused, " unless her Husband would 
 subscribe a Paper " — which was indeed to let the cat out 
 of the bag — the Provost further threatening to have him 
 driven furth of the town "by the Hand of the Hangman." 
 That night Jerome Hunter, the Treasurer, came to the 
 prison and invited the captive to sign his demission, when 
 all would be well ; but the doughty dominie indignantly 
 declined to do anything that might prejudice his just cause. 
 His spirit was unsubdued, and " tho' in no very merry Fit, 
 he drol'd a little with the Treasurer," telling him that if 
 the magistrates would shew no pity to him and his family, 
 who ivere rational creatures like themselves, yet they might 
 have mercy upon the harmless hens and chickens in his 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 213 
 
 house, that Avere Hke to starve for hunger : if they would 
 not feed them, it were more humane to kill and eat them. 
 The delightful irony of this passage was thrown away upon 
 the Treasurer, who doubtless was as thick-headed as his 
 colleagues. Charitable neighbours gave shelter to the 
 children and servants, and " by Intercession of a Gentle- 
 man " — probably a unique specimen in Lithgow at that 
 time — Mrs. Kirkwood was permitted to share her husband's 
 cell, where the afflicted couple lay on the cold stone floor 
 "all Saturday and Sunday nights," 8th and 9th February. 
 
 On Monday morning Pardovan sent his officers to tell 
 the prisoner " to provide an House within an Hour to put 
 his furniture in." Mr. Kirkwood replied that his furniture 
 was in his own house, and he had no mind to remove 
 it ; whereupon fresh orders were issued that he should be 
 haled out of the Tolbooth to see his goods ejected. " Out 
 I will not go," said he, " till I know who put me in, and for 
 what crime I am imprisoned." The matter being referred 
 to the Provost, that despot " refused to answer any of these 
 Questions." The captive was accordingly dragged back to 
 his dwelling-place, where he found eight men, led by James 
 Muckle, Deacon of the Wrights, " with Hammers and other 
 Instruments fit for ejecting his Goods." These ministers of 
 justice proceeded "to break open what Doors, Presses and 
 Trunks were fast in the House, and to throw out all the 
 Furniture, not into the Gloss, which was a Place of some 
 Security and not very nesty, but into the open Street, a 
 dirty, unsecure and disgraceful Place, in view of the World." 
 Fine Dutch presses were smashed in pieces, porcelain and 
 glass broken, bed and chamber hangings torn and spoiled ; 
 forty large illuminated maps and charts, many rare pictures 
 and other ornaments, were " pull'd down in a Moment's 
 time by ignorant and rude Fellows, design'dly abusing them 
 that Mr. Kirkwood might cede from his Right." Chiefly lie 
 laments the ruin of " 1800 Grammars in loose Sheets, printed 
 in London " — the remainder of his magnum opus. Some of 
 the furniture was thrown from the third and fourth storeys 
 
214 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 into the churchyard, many things were " carried away by 
 People and never afterwards seen," and the residue "sus- 
 tained by this Ejection great Hurt and Dammage." The 
 only room in the house to escape the fury of the Provost's 
 satellites was the dominie's own study or closet, which, as 
 we shall see, was to form the subject of a separate outrage 
 later. 
 
 AVhen at 6 p.m. the work of destruction was complete — 
 they had been at it since 10 in the morning — the prisoner 
 asked how he himself was to be disposed of " They told 
 him they did not know ; but he was to wait there until all 
 the Goods were carried off the Street into Houses, and then 
 they were ordered to go to the Provost to ask what to do 
 with him." So soon as the officers had withdrawn upon 
 this errand, Mrs. Kirk wood " went and came by the Loch 
 side (that she might shun the gazing Multitude)," where 
 she was forced to perform her necessary ablutions in the icy 
 water. Her husband meanwhile " slip't out and went up 
 to the Palace, about 20 paces distant, a Place of Security, 
 being a Sanctuary into which the Town's Officers dare not 
 set their Foot," where he took the freedom, " even in the 
 Earl of Lithgo's absence," (a) to call for and obtain some 
 much-needed refreshment and rest : he had been fasting for 
 twenty-four hours. " While he was very busy with a Dish 
 of good Collops in the Earl's House, one of the Servants 
 comes running, telling the Officers were going up and down 
 like distracted Men, crying, ' What will we do ? what will 
 we do ? the Provost will slay us ! '" After some hours' 
 repose Mr. Kirkwood, " about 2 or 3 in the Morning, by 
 the Help of the Moon, came stepping through Dub and 
 Mire (for he kept not the common Eoad for fear the 
 Provost's tlounds should have catcht him) into Edinburgh, 
 without Coat, Cloak or Staff, for he knew not what was 
 become of them nor in what House to cause seek them. 
 Thus he escaped out of Prison and yet did not break it ; 
 
 (a) The Earls of Linlithgow were hereditary keepers of the Royal palace 
 from the reigu of James the Sixth until their forfeiture in 1715. 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN OODS OF LINLITHGOW 215 
 
 got from the Hands of the Officers, yet run not from 
 them." 
 
 To explain how he thus made himself at home in Lord 
 Linlithgow's apartments, Mr. Kirkwood tells us that in 
 happier days he had enjoyed the familiar friendship of that 
 nobleman, being often invited by him to the palace, 
 " especially in the long Winter Evenings," on which occa- 
 sions " now and then they took a Game at Chess." No 
 doubt his Lordship {a) esteemed the worthy dominie's 
 learning, humour and good sense, qualities at the time 
 somewhat to seek in Lithgow. The Royal palace of which 
 he was the constable, the birthplace of Queen Mary, was 
 then intact and habitable, and so continued until its wanton 
 destruction by the Hanoverian troops in 1746, after the 
 rout of Falkirk. When Hawley's dragoons lit huge fires 
 in the rooms, Mrs. Glen Gordon, the chatelaine, who had 
 entertained the Prince there on his march upon Edinburgh 
 the year before, remonstrated with the General on the 
 reckless conduct of his men ; but that unhappy warrior said 
 they might burn down the palace for all he cared. " Weel, 
 General," rejoined the dame, " / can rin aiva frae fire as 
 fast as you!" and so took horse for Edinburgh. (6) 
 
 On the Saturday of his incarceration our indefatigable 
 litigant had found means to write to the Lord Advocate, 
 complaining of his ill-usage, and also to his legal advisers in 
 the capital, instructing them to proceed against the Provost 
 for wrongous imprisonment ; and by Monday morning the 
 news of the fresh outrage of which he was the subject "run 
 through the City as if it had been put by Tuck of Drum." 
 No sooner was the report spread abroad than the prisoner 
 himself appeared among the citizens on the causeway of 
 Auld Reikie, and "whether it was Matter of greater 
 
 (a) George Livingstone, fourth Earl of Linlithgow, who had commanded a 
 company of the King's Life Guards at Bothwell Bridge, and at the Revolution 
 was superseded by Pardovan as Provost of the burgh. 
 
 (6) Collie's Roijal Palace of Linlithgow, p. 23 ; Waldie's Hidory of Linlithgow, 
 p. 73. 
 
216 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 Astonishment to the Lords of Session, Advocates and many 
 Hundreds of other People to hear one Minute that Mr. Kirk- 
 wood was lying in Prison in Lithgo, or in the next to see 
 him walking at the Cross of Edinburgh, is not easy to tell." 
 If he had been his own ghost, he says, his appearance could 
 scarcely have caused a greater sensation ; " in a word, had 
 he return'd after 7 years' Captivity among the Turks, he 
 could not have received a more hearty Welcome and been 
 more troubled with Questions." And though everyone was 
 sorry to hear of the barbarous treatment he and his family 
 had met with, " yet the gravest of them, and his greatest 
 friends, could not contain themselves from laughing at the 
 odd Circumstances of the Story." Verily, but for his 
 possession of the saving grace of humour, the poor school- 
 master might well have sunk beneath the accumulating 
 burden of his woes. " If Men be thus used, or rather 
 abused," he quaintly observes, " they had better go keep 
 Sheep than be at vast Pains and Expence to fit themselves 
 for training up of Youth." 
 
 At a consultation with his counsel the learned gentlemen 
 were of opinion that the magistrates' behaviour " was a 
 more atrocious Crime than the Lords of Session could 
 punish, and properly belonged to the Secret Council." 
 The Town had in effect " thrown filth and mire at the Faces 
 of the Lords and spit in their very Countenances, bidding 
 them utter Defiance." 
 
 On Wednesday 12th February, "as he was coming out 
 of the Countess of Kincardin's Lodging" — Lord Kincardine, 
 it will be remembered, was his former patron — Mr. Kirk- 
 wood met the Lord Advocate, to whom he had written from 
 Linlithgow, pointing out that though his Lordship was 
 counsel for the Town, " yet now he [as Public Prosecutor] 
 behoved to turn Sail, and strike in with him [Kirkwood] in 
 Matters of Riot." If the metaphor was mixed, the argu- 
 ment was sufficiently sound. "'We are well met,' saith 
 my Lord, ' I received your Letter, I know the whole Affair ; 
 they arc wild People you have to do with ; I would advise 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 217 
 
 you to leave them. Will you accept of 50 Pounds Sterling 
 and pass from this Riot of imprisoning you, and be pay'd 
 up to this Day, of Salary, School- wages and any thing else 
 that is due you as School-master? and besides they will 
 pass from the Fine, for now they fear you. You need not 
 doubt but you will get a Place.' ' Alas, my Lord,' replied 
 Mr. Kirkwood, 'I find you know not all my Business. 
 That they did on Saturday is but Bairn's-play by what 
 they did Yesterday. - Fifty Pounds, my Lord ! many Fifties 
 will not repair my Loss. I'm ruined. They have thrown 
 all I have out into the open Street, broken and destroyed 
 every thing.' ' They are certainly gone mad,' said my 
 Lord, lifting up both his Hands ; and with that run away." 
 Alan Fairfbrd fled from Peebles v. Plainstanes ; this, as 
 we have seen, is the second occasion on which Kirkwood v. 
 The Gods of Lithgoiv put the Lord Advocate to flight. 
 
 Next day the dominie, being in the Parliament House, 
 was approached by Mr. Stewart. That wily counsellor, 
 "with a Smile, took him by the Hand very heartily," 
 and hoped that he would now " agree " with the Town. Mr. 
 Kirkwood dryly remarked that he (Stewart) had been 
 so far the chief obstacle to such agreement, having opposed 
 a settlement until the decision of the Court was obtained ; 
 he (Kirkwood) might now retort that the afl'air could 
 not be settled except by sentence of the Privy Council. 
 After some further discussion the schoolmaster was per- 
 suaded to submit the matter to the Lord Advocate, on 
 whom as " a discreet Person " he could rely ; whereupon 
 Stewart "again takes Mr. Kirkwood by the Hand and 
 leads him to the Advocate, who was sitting at a very 
 little Distance on a Bench in the Outer House." In 
 the end his Lordship consented to act as arbiter, though 
 the oflice was "sore against his Will." To the profane 
 this episode might seem to savour of what is vulgarly 
 known as a put-up job. Be that as it may, an arrange- 
 ment was come to that the parties should meet next 
 mornino- m the Advocate's chambers — the Provost, the 
 
218 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 Treasurer and Bailie Higgins being then in town — when 
 an effort would be made to bring about a settlement. 
 Kirkwood's magnanimity in thus consenting to meet his 
 adversaries half way served no purpose beyond furnishing 
 further proof of their stupidity, for Pardovan and his 
 fellow wiseacres declined to attend the conference or to 
 submit to his Lordship's judgment, unless the dominie 
 should first acknowledge it was in the Town's power to 
 remove him at their pleasure. This, of course, he refused 
 to do, so nothing came of "Wily Jamie's" motion. 
 
 On 19th February the great cause was again debated 
 at the bar before Lord Philiphaugh, Commissary Dalrymple 
 for the schoolmaster "beginning with these Words to 
 Mr. Stewart, 'Why did you eject me out of my House? 
 Why did you imprison me? Why did you cast all my 
 Goods out into the open Streets?'" Stew^art for the 
 Town refused to speak to any of these points ; he would 
 deal only with the question which the Lords in their 
 last interlocutor had sent for discussion : W^hether or not 
 it was in the Town's power to remove Mr. Kirk wood at 
 pleasure? " 'Tis in their poiver," said the Commissary, 
 with a smile. " It is indeed," added Mr. Kirkwood, " In 
 eorum potentia sed non potestate " — physically they could 
 cast him out, but not legally. It were tedious, as he 
 remarks, to set down here all that was said pro and con. 
 Stewart, " being sore pinch'd with the Commissary's Argu- 
 ments," admitted that the Town had no power to deprive 
 their master of his office, yet they had power to demit him. 
 This distinction between deprivative and demissive power 
 was received in Court with " a short laughter," the judge 
 observing " That it was Petitio Principtii, a meer begging 
 of the Question, a Quibble about Words." After hearing 
 counsel, his Lordship intimated that he would report 
 the cause on a later date ; but the Session rising on the 
 28th, no report was made, " And here Matters stand 'twixt 
 the Town and Mr. Kirkwood on the last of February 1690 
 as to Civil Law ; but as to Club Law it is as follows." 
 
THE TWEXTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 219 
 
 Destined equally a victim to both systems of juris- 
 prudence, our dominie returned to Linlithgow, where he 
 established himself in " an hired House " until he could 
 dispose of the wreckage of his furniture. At 9 a.m. on 
 Saturday Lst March, as he was "sitting in his Nightgown, 
 trimming himself," there came to him one of the Provost's 
 minions with orders that he should immediately present 
 himself before the Council. The schoolmaster replied that 
 he was shaving and could not then go ; the officer returned 
 with a summons even more peremptory. "They must 
 either let me stay here at Jericho," said Mr. Kirkwood, 
 " till that part of my Beard which is taken off grow again 
 like the rest, or give me Time to take off the whole. I 
 hope they mind not to affront me as Hanun did David's 
 Messengers." (a) His toilet at length completed, Mr. 
 Kirkwood repaired to the Town-house. " Come forward, 
 Schoolmaster ! " cried the Provost in a very loud voice — 
 ("for he had gotten such a check for saying 'Sirrah' 
 before, that he held off that"). "Schoolmaster I am," 
 rejoined the indomitable dominie, " and ought so to be 
 call'd, till the Lords of Session determine the contrary." 
 Pardovan then ordered him to remove by Tuesday next 
 the contents of his study (which, as the reader may 
 remember, had escaped the recent raid) and to deliver 
 the key to the Treasurer. Kirkwood pointed out that 
 until the cause was decided against him the whole house 
 and study were his, and that the Lords had expressly 
 forbidden the Council to meddle further with him. " If 
 you will not remove your Goods willingly," retorted 
 Pardovan, "we shall do it by Force," and so the matter 
 rested for the time. 
 
 On Tuesday following, the Treasurer, two bailies and 
 four officers proceeded to the schoolhouse and sent one of 
 their number to demand of Kirkwood the key, " which 
 
 (a) "So Hanun took David's servants, and shaved off the one half of their 
 beards, and cut otf their garments in the middle, even to their buttocks, and 
 sent them away." — 2 Samuel x. 4. 
 
220 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 they must either get or carry him to prison." He elected 
 for the latter alternative, and voluntarily set out for the 
 Tolbooth. " As he is going towards it he meets another 
 Officer with Orders to carry him to the Bailies. 'I'm 
 going to Prison,' said Mr. Kirkwood to the Officer. * You 
 must not go,' said the other. 'I will go,' replied Mr. 
 Kirkwood. ' You shall not,' said the other ; and with 
 this they began to struggle." This Gilbertian contest 
 terminated in presence of the bailies, who said that they 
 had given no orders for his arrest, a statement which the 
 officer " in their sight and audience " denied. " Whether 
 the Bailies or Officer be guilty of the Breach of the Ninth 
 Commandment they know best themselves and let others 
 make conjecture," is Mr. Kirkwood's comment upon this 
 "odd Passage." A quaint instance of the dominie's 
 pedantic humour concludes the scene. " ' Tho' we will 
 not imprison you,' said Bailie Main, 'yet you deserve it.' 
 'Upon what ground. Bailie?' answered Mr. Kirkwood. 
 ' For your Pervicacy,' said the other. ' I was once your 
 Master,' replied Mr. Kirkwood, 'and I think I must be 
 it again ; for you seem not well to understand what Per- 
 vicacy is. If all things were rightly considered it would 
 be found you are rather Pervicacious in this Matter than 
 I : for a Pervicacious Man is one that is so wedded to a 
 thing that, be it right, be it wrong, he will prosecute it. 
 But I find, Gentlemen, this is a needless Debate; and, 
 therefore, farewel.' " 
 
 While this was adoing Pardovan, "a Sword by him," 
 was majoring about at the Cross " in a very odd Manner." 
 As Mr. Kirkwood went towards him to protest against 
 this new outrage, an officer came up in great haste, saying, 
 " By no means go nigh the Provost, for he is in a Fury." 
 Whereupon the dominie turned aside: "the Provost, it 
 seems, was for Bloody War, Mr. Kirkwood only for Civil ; 
 but sore does he now repent he went not up to him, tho' 
 he should have got a broken Head." The old Adam stirred 
 beneath the cloak of the philosopher, and indeed Pardovan's 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 221 
 
 conduct had been such as, in the memorable words of 
 Mrs. Gamp, "lambs could not forgive, nor worms forget." 
 Meanwhile the civic forces, led by Deacon Muckle, " broke 
 open with Hammers and other Tools his Closet door," and 
 cast out into the open and dirty street all his books, 
 papers, and MSS., "being the Product of 30 Years' great 
 Labours." The only official expression of regret came 
 from Bailie Smith, who said that if the windows had not 
 been " all fast with Nails," he would have had the things 
 thrown from the third storey. Next morning Mr. Kirk- 
 wood, shaking the dust of Lithgow from his feet, went 
 to Edinburgh and took a house, " where he might live 
 with his poor distressed Wife and Children at some more 
 Ease, without the Reach of these bloody Canibals." The 
 term is a strong one, but I think it is warranted by the 
 circumstances. 
 
 The course of our dominie's protracted litigation recalls 
 another "ganging plea" — that of Hutchinson v. Mac- 
 kitchinson, of which mine host of the Hawes boasted to the 
 Antiquary : " It's been four times in afore the Fifteen, and 
 deil ony thing the wisest o' them could make o't, but just 
 to send it out again to the Outer House. Oh, it's a 
 beautiful thing to see how lang and how carefully justice 
 is considered in this country ! " In a " General Account of 
 the Dammage, Loss, Expence and Trouble Mr. Kirk wood has 
 met with by this Plea, preceding April 1690," appended to 
 his Short Information, the author thus surveys the field of 
 his judicial operations : " Know that he Raised and Discust 
 Three Suspensions, an Advocation, a Summonds of Reduc- 
 tion, a Declarator ; Cited to Edinburgh the whole Town 
 Council ; Gave in to the Lords Seven Bills, 82 Informa- 
 tions ; 'look 31 Instruments, Extracted 7 Acts made by 
 the Town, Got Doubles of their Bills, besides many other 
 Papers, as Minutes, Interlocutors, etc." The cause was 
 fourteen times debated at the bar, he attended the Court 
 of Session for fifteen weeks, and he travelled to and from 
 Edinburgh eighteen times upon that business. 
 
222 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 These things, observes Mr. Kirk^YOod, reflecting on his 
 late painful experiences, were not done in a corner, but 
 openly and avowedly " in Face of the Sun " ; not by an 
 ignorant rabble, but by men in public trust, magistrates of 
 a royal and ancient burgh, "a Company of Gods, as they 
 call themselves," whose duty it was to protect others from 
 cruelty and oppression. They were done, not to a stranger 
 or foreigner, " but to their Door-Neighbour, their familiar 
 Friend and most intimate Acquaintance, yea, to a fellow 
 Burgess and Gild-brother," who had, moreover, deserved 
 well of his country by publishing many useful works. 
 They were done to one " that was altogether innocent as to 
 what Man can lay to his Charge," w^ho had lived fifteen 
 years among them without the least stain on his character : 
 and all because he refused to forsake the public worship of 
 the Church for the service of the Provost's kitchen. For 
 this cause alone was he branded as " a Re viler of the Gods 
 of his People." " 'Tis worth the Enquiry to know," he 
 characteristically remarks, "the Antecedent or Substantive 
 to the Word ' His ' in this so singular a Phrase. At the 
 reading of the Information it was pretty warmly debated 
 by Persons of Honour whether it was God, Provost or 
 Kirkwood : a Reviler of the Gods of God's People, or the 
 Provost's People, or Kirkwood's people. Some were for 
 one, some for another, some for none of them, averring it 
 was not good Grammar considering the Context, and that 
 instead of ' His ' it should be ' The ' : a Reviler of the Gods 
 of the People. Others cry'd out it was the hight of 
 Blasphemy to call any Webster or Tailor in the Kingdom a 
 God." Posterity, however, so far at least as I may venture 
 to speak for it, is little likely to quarrel with that diverting 
 phrase, which, one is happy to think, must have been 
 wormwood to the magistrates for the term of their official life. 
 
 When in March 1690 it was known that Mr. Kirkwood 
 had left Linlithgow, several persons of position and influence 
 asked him to undertake the education of their children, so 
 that he soon came to have "a very frequent School, above 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOAV 223 
 
 Sevenscore of Noblemen and Gentlemen's sons." Nor was 
 this the only mark he received of esteem for his talents and 
 sympathy in his misfortunes. St. Andrews University 
 offered him the Chair of Humanity. He was called to be 
 Professor of Greek in the CoUeo-e of James Town, Virginia, 
 and his friend the Bishop of London urged him to accept ; 
 but he feared the climate for his young family. The 
 grammar schools of Duns, Kimbolton and Kelso contended 
 for the benefit of his teaching. Lord Tweeddale, the 
 Chancellor, was "very pressing" that Kelso should be the 
 favoured one, and to its claims, further supported by Lady 
 Roxburgh, Mr. Kirkwood eventually gave the preference. 
 But the most surprising overture made to him proceeded 
 from his old enemy the Provost, who commissioned a 
 minister " to deal with Mr. Kirkwood in order to get him 
 back again to Lithgow upon good Terms " ! The recipient 
 of this invitation "stood no less amaz d than if it had been 
 told him all the Rivers were running back again to their 
 Spring from whence they came." " We read," he con- 
 tinues, " of very many strange Things told us by Ovid in 
 his Metamorphoses; how Men, yea, Gods themselves were 
 transformed into the Shape of Beasts : Acteon was for no 
 very great Fault turned into a Hart, and devour'd by his 
 own Dogs ; Jupiter into a Bull, for his own carnal Ends. 
 But those are nothing if compared to this. Here bloody 
 and rampant Lions, wild and savage Boars, cruel and 
 greedy Wolves and Tygers are become harmless and 
 innocent little Lambs." Though the terms offered by the 
 Town were "very charming," it need hardly be said that 
 Mr. Kirkwood was unable to accept them ; no transforma- 
 tion the Gods of Lithgow might affect could deceive that 
 " burnt Bairn." 
 
 Hitherto Mr,- Kirkwood, like Daniel in the Lions' Den, 
 had been for the Council the centre of attraction, but on 
 the withdrawal of that bone of contention their natural 
 ferocity prompted them to turn upon each other, and their 
 war-cries were heard even in the Court of Session. In 
 
224 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 January 1691, meeting Bailie Beer one day in the Parlia- 
 ment Close, the dominie thus addressed him : " ' What's 
 this, Bailie, now fallen out among you ? I hear of very 
 horrid and dreadful Crimes laid to some of your Charges. 
 You are pursuing one another to Death. I thought if once 
 I had been removed from amongst you, you would have 
 agreed all like Lambs, whereas you are now worse than 
 ever.' 'If I had Time and Place convenient,' answer'd the 
 Bailie, ' I would give you a perfect account of all things.' 
 'Let's step into the Old Kirk,' replied Mr. Kirkwood. 
 'With all my Heart,' said the Bailie." So the pair entered 
 St. Giles Church, which then " was wont to stand open the 
 whole Day, that People may go into it Morning and 
 Evening to shut up their Prayers to the Almighty," and 
 there the bailie gave him the news of the recent " Battels '' 
 in the Council. For these, though highly entertaining, I 
 have no space. Moved by this recital of the Provost's 
 latest "Pranks" the schoolmaster exclaimed: "'Bailie, 
 Bailie, were it done to some of you as was done to the 
 unjust Judge, you would but get what you deserve ! ' 
 ' Pray, Mr. Kirkwood ' said the Bailie, ' tell me what was 
 done to that unjust Judge?' 'The Skin,' replied Mr. 
 Kirkwood, ' was taken off him and affix'd to the Bench 
 where Sentence was past, to scare others from doing the 
 like.' At this the Bailie lifted up his Hands and Shoulders 
 towards the very Heavens, saying, ' Good Lord deliver us ! 
 Cou'd such a thing be done to a Judge ? ' " And with this 
 he sunk down to the very ground, so that Mr. Kirkwood 
 "was truly fear'd to be alone with him." When he had 
 sufficiently recovered, his admonisher spoke very kindly to 
 him and gave him some sensible advice, for which the 
 bailie professed himself grateful, and so they parted. It is 
 to be hoped that he took the parable home with him to 
 Linlithgow. 
 
 Not until June 1692 was Mr. Kirkwood's cause con- 
 sidered by the Lords of Their Majesties' Privy Council. 
 In the course of the debate before that august tribunal 
 
THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 225 
 
 Mr. Stewart, for the Town, denied tliat the " treacherous " 
 petition of which we have heard was ever presented to the 
 Court of Session at all Mr. Kirkwood thereupon produced 
 from his pocket the original document, signed by Stewart 
 himself, "at which the Lords lookt one to another" — and 
 no wonder ; "so that the Town was quite defeat and 
 baffled, and their Advocates rendered speechless, not one 
 of them opening his Mouth." Even "wiliness" has its 
 occasional drawbacks. The Privy Council appointed Lord 
 Fountainhall,(a) one of their number, to take evidence as 
 to the amount of Mr. Kirkwood's claim, to which that 
 gentleman deponed as follows : — 
 
 lib. Scots 
 800 
 
 Imo. That he wanted of by-run Salaries preceeding Whit 
 Sunday then last, three Years, ...... 
 
 2do. His Profits in the School two Years and a half, viz 
 Quarter- Wages and three Candlemass OfTerings, with other 
 Casualties, 1800 
 
 Stio. His House and Garden, with Consideration of his 
 Advantage by Tablers [boarders], 500 
 
 j^to. The Spoiling of his Goods and their Imbazling; and the 
 Loss by the Auction, and the transporting them to Edinburgh, . 1500 
 
 5to. The Expense of Plea before the Lords of Session, . . 1200 
 
 Summa 5800 
 
 Over and above, there was " the Pretium affectionis of 
 Things, which is very considerable"; as well as "his own 
 indefatigable Pains both of Body and Mind." 
 
 Pardovan, for not compearing before the Privy Council 
 when summoned, was " denounced Rebel and put to the 
 Horn," and his movable goods ordered to be escheat and 
 forfeit to Their Majesties' use, all which was duly done at 
 the Cross of Lithgow on 11th July 1692. Though advised 
 to "put in for Pardovan's Escheat" the dominie, "looking 
 on it as an odious Thing," refused to benefit by his enemy's 
 so merited misfortune. The burgh was fined 4000 merks 
 for Mr. Kirkwood's use, and Lord Linlithgow was appointed 
 
 (a) Sir John Lauder of Fouiitaiiilial], the loariicd historian and judge. 
 
 15 
 
226 THE TWENTY-SEVEN GODS OF LINLITHGOW 
 
 to enquire whether the Provost and bailies only, or the 
 whole members of council were guilty of the several riots. 
 One would expect that our worthy friend's trials were 
 now over, and that at least materially he was recompensed 
 for all his tribulations. But, alas, he says in his History, 
 "to this Day, viz, 10th April 1711, he has not receiv'd the 
 Worth of a Farthing ! What he will get he knows not ; 
 however, he still lives in good Hopes." Of this amazing 
 miscarriage of justice the dominie offers the following 
 explanation : Lord Linlithgow died before making his 
 report ; and he himself entering at the time upon his 
 duties at Kelso, " fell into a vast Ocean of Troubles, was 
 tost as in a Blanket, hurried from Court to Court, from 
 one Judicature to another, for several Years." K full 
 account of this fresh embroilment was published by him in 
 1698. (a) Its 144 closely-printed quarto pages are devoted 
 to the story of his plea with the Kirk and Presbytery of 
 Kelso, from which it appears that he was even more 
 evilly entreated by the divines of that town than he had 
 been by the Gods of Lithgow. "Whether that Battel 
 Mr. Kirkwood had with the Burgh or that with the Kirk 
 was the most severe and bloody," he is at a loss to 
 determine ; but as regards mental suffering, " that with 
 the Kirk does infinitely surpass this with the Burgh." Of 
 the history of this new Holy War I lack time and space to 
 treat ; but if the reader be not weary of Mr. Kirkwood and 
 his woes, at some propitious season I may have a tale to 
 tell : how the dauntless dominie wrestled with wild beasts 
 at Ephesus, yet was not overcome of them, and how in the 
 end, like as the sun emerging from the morning mists, he 
 broke through clouds of calumny into a clearer sky. 
 
 (a) Mr. Kirkwood' s Plea before the Kirk and Civil Judicatures of Scotland, 
 Divided into Five Parts. . . . London, Printed by D. E. for the Author. 1698. 
 
THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
THE HAED CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 Second Clown. But is this law '? 
 
 First Clown. Ay, marry, is 't ; crowuer's quest law. 
 
 — Hamlet, Act V. Sc. 1. 
 
 "pvEGENERATE and disloyal Scots have been known to 
 -^-^ lament the absence from our legal usage of that 
 palladium of English justice, the coroner's court, as tend- 
 ing to foster in our lieges a taste for manslaughter and 
 to confer immunity on murderers. And while it may be 
 allowed that there have been, north of Tweed, one or two 
 notable cases in which a public inquest conducted by such 
 an official immediately upon discovery of the crime perhaps 
 might better have brought the criminal to book than our 
 more leisurely and private method of inquiry, yet in the 
 instances I have in mind it was not so much the system 
 that was at fault as the functionaries responsible for its 
 administration. Even Procurators-Fiscal are human ; they 
 make mistakes and have their weaknesses like lesser folk. 
 But had a coroner's jury sat upon the Sandy ford Place 
 murder of 1862, the subsequent proceedings of which Mrs. 
 M'Lachlan was the centre would probably have assumed 
 a different aspect ; a remark which, for other reasons, 
 equally applies to a more recent mystery that might have 
 been dispelled had prompter measures been taken to 
 investigate it, where the venue was thought to have been 
 chosen for the express purpose of avoiding the English 
 procedure. 
 
 Be these matters as they may, admirers of that system 
 must have been disagreeably surprised by the facts dis- 
 closed upon the trial in 1915 of George Joseph Smith, 
 commonly called the Brides-in-the-bath case. This modern 
 disciple of Bluebeard and King Henry VIII. married some 
 
 229 
 
230 THE HAED CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 seven wives, most of whom he was content to desei't after 
 robbing them of their ready money ; but his last three 
 victims, possessing some property and making wills in his 
 favour, were successively drowned in their baths. In each 
 case the murderer followed the same formula, and in each 
 case a coroner's jury after full inquiry pronounced a verdict 
 of death from natural causes. It w^as objected to Sir 
 Walter Scott that in characters of the Meg Merrilies type 
 he was "good, but good too often " ; the same may be said 
 of Mr. Smith's novel and ingenious device for solving the 
 chief problem involved in the successful commission of 
 murder : the disposal of the remains. Once was well 
 enough, twice might have passed as a coincidence, but 
 thrice was more than the most sanguine of assassins could 
 reasonably hope to compass. Still, for originality of design 
 and boldness in execution these crimes would have merited 
 the encomium of De Quincey. 
 
 I propose to give here a short account of the most 
 flagrant abuse of the coroner's powers with w^hich I am 
 acquainted. The fact that the sufferer was a Scotsman 
 " of an auld descent " has induced me, contrary to my 
 custom, thus to venture across the Border, in the belief 
 that the tale may go some way to reconcile malcontents 
 with our native and familiar practice. For the facts I am 
 indebted to a contemporary pamphlet, entitled : " The 
 Case of Mr. James Oliphant, Surgeon, respecting a Prosecu- 
 tion which He, together with his Wife and Maid 
 Servant, underwent in the Year 1764, for the suppos'd 
 Murder of a Female Domestic. Newcastle upon Tyne : 
 Printed for Mr. Oliphant ; and sold by B. Fleming, in 
 Newcastle ; J. Johnson, in London ; W. Drummond, in 
 Edinburgh ; and all other Booksellers in Great Britain, 
 &c. MDCCLXVIII." 
 
 The victim of this scandalous miscarriage of justice was 
 a scion of an ancient and honourable family, " a House 
 very Loyall to the State of Scotland," the Oliphants of 
 Gask. His father was James Oliphant, brother to the 
 
THE HAKD CASE OF ME. JAMES OLIPHANT 231 
 
 Jacobite laird who was governor of Perth in 1746 ; his 
 mother was Janet Austin of Kilspindie. In those times 
 the younger sons of the old Jacobite and Episcopalian 
 families, to whom all public and most professional careers 
 were closed, commonly entered some business or trade. 
 Thus James Oliphant pere became a wine merchant in 
 Perth. By 1749, as appears from a letter of his son, he 
 had taken a house and shop in Edinburgh " to dale in the 
 grocery way. "(a) He had three sons, of whom the eldest, 
 James, is to engage our attention. The lad first followed 
 the profession of arms, and in the letter above cited he 
 describes himself as "Cadet in Lieu. Generall Halkcts 
 Eegiment in Garrison at Ypres." The elder James 
 abandoned the grocery business in 1751; four years later 
 he asked his brother Laurence, the laird, then in exile in 
 Paris, to get a commission for young James in the Spanish 
 service. Whether or not the laird did anything for his 
 nephew does not appear, but he refused to allow his 
 brother James, whose circumstances were straitened, an 
 asylum at Gask.(6) " After passing a few of his juvenile 
 years in the army," James tells us in his Case, he 
 exchanged the sword for the scalpel, and in 1755 married 
 Margaret, daughter of Mr. William Erskine, a surgeon 
 in Gateshead, who had been in practice there for some 
 forty years, during which he enjoyed a high reputation by 
 reason of his sterling character and professional skill. He 
 took his young son-in-law into partnership, but by the 
 time in question the old gentleman had retired, and James 
 Oliphant carried on the practice alone. 
 
 In the month of May 1764 the household consisted of 
 Mr. and Mrs. Oliphant, their two children, old Mr. Erskine 
 and two maidservants. That month one of the maids fell 
 sick and had to leave, so a girl named Dinah Armstrong 
 was engaged, without a "character," to take her place. 
 It afterwards appeared that Dinah was other than a good 
 
 (a) The Oliphants of Gask, p. 163. (6) Ibid., p. 1G4. 
 
232 THE HAED CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 one, having been dismissed a few days before from the 
 service of Mrs. Heath, a widow resident in Newcastle, 
 upon suspicion of theft, a fact then unknown to her new 
 mistress. The plausible account which the girl gave of 
 herself, coupled with "a good countenance," was un- 
 fortunately deemed sufficient recommendation. On 5th 
 June Mr. and Mrs. Oliphant went to Scotland on a visit 
 to that gentleman's relations, leaving their children in the 
 care of a friend, Mrs. Milne, wife of a merchant in 
 Newcastle. Dinah went with the children as their nurse. 
 
 When Mrs. Oliphant came home on 10th July she was 
 told by Mrs. Milne that the maid had been detected in 
 certain pilferings by her, that lady having among other 
 things missed three damask napkins, " which from circum- 
 stances she strongly suspected the said Dinah of taking." 
 She therefore requested Mrs. Oliphant to examine the girl 
 strictly about them. Accordingly on Friday, 13th July, 
 Mrs, Oliphant spoke to Dinah on the subject, mentioned 
 the missing napkins and Mrs Milne's suspicions, and begged 
 her to be candid and declare the truth. The damsel 
 positively denied the charge. Asked if she would allow 
 her chest to be searched, Dinah reluctantly consented ; no 
 napkins were found there, but a linen sheet, " mark'd in 
 such a manner as if intended to be cut into shifts," and 
 bearing the initials A. H., was discovered. This, she said, 
 was " a gift of a relation's," but on the sheet being identified 
 by Mrs. Heath, her former mistress, as that lady's property, 
 Dinah confessed that she had stolen it, together with some 
 other trifles. On Monday, 16th July, Mrs. Oliphant pre- 
 sented her with certain underlinen, supposing the girl to 
 have been tempted by the inadequacy of her wardrobe in 
 that regard ; she also gave the culprit much excellent advice, 
 said she would keep her till her quarter had expired, 
 promised to intercede for her with Mesdames Heath and 
 Milne, " and only begg'd she would for her own sake restore 
 the three napkins to the owner." But Dinah persisted that 
 she knew nothing of them. 
 
THE HAKD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIl'HANT 233 
 
 Mrs. Milne, who seems to have taken the rape of the 
 napkins very hard, now intimated her intention to prose- 
 cute Dinah so soon as she left the Oliphants' service, and 
 urged that she be dismissed forthwith. Mrs. Oliphant, 
 unfortunately, as it proved, for all concerned, did not do so. 
 Anxious if possible to save the girl from public disgrace 
 and punishment, she thought that "if some person of 
 ingenuity w^as to interrogate her " the peccant Dinah might 
 be brought to confess her fault and make restitution. A 
 neighbour, John Green, tallow chandler in Gateshead, " a 
 gentleman of great humanity," w^as called in, and being 
 acquainted with the position of matters, on the forenoon 
 of Tuesday, 17th July, he "expostulated with the girl, 
 representing to her the natural consequences of her conduct 
 and of a prosecution." Dinah pleaded guilty to the sheet 
 but continued steadfast in her denial of the napkins. He 
 left her to think it over, saying he would return later in 
 the day for her final answer. Meanwhile the girl went 
 about her domestic duties as usual, brought up water from 
 the cellar several times — the house stood beside the river — 
 took the children to school, and fetched from the Queen's 
 Head in Pipewellgate ale for the mid -day dinner. 
 
 In order to appreciate the evidence as to what occurred 
 that day it is necessary to have some conception of Mr. 
 Oliphant's abode. " The house stands at the south end of 
 Tyne Bridge, on the first arch, and on the west side of the 
 street. In the second or middle floor is the kitclien and 
 parlour, whose doors are opposite each other. Next below 
 is the shop on the ground floor, and underneath the shop 
 is the cellar, into which the descent is by winding stairs. 
 The cellar has a door cut into two parts ; the upper part 
 opening for the purpose of receiving air and light, the under 
 part opening occasionally for convenience of loading or 
 unloading goods from thence into or from the river Tyne, 
 which at high tide runs deep and rapid almost close 
 below." (a) 
 
 (a) The case of Mr. James Oliphatit, p[). 5-6. 
 
234 THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 Between the hours of one and two on the afternoon of 
 Tuesday, 17th July, the family sat down to dinner in the 
 parlour. There were present Mr. Oliphant and his wife, old 
 Mr. Erskine, and Mr. Henry Thompson, a resident patient 
 under the doctor's care, who had been living with them 
 since June. Mary Shittleton, the other servant, a respect- 
 able girl enjoying her employers' confidence, attended the 
 table. The dishing of the dinner was done in the kitchen 
 by Dinah, whose demeanour was then noticeably dull and 
 sullen. Mrs. French, a staymaker, was also in the kitchen, 
 awaiting the return of the elder child from schoorto try 
 on a pair of stays. Finding the time hang heavily Mrs. 
 French was " amusing herself at the window," and paid 
 little attention to the movements of the sulky handmaid. 
 Mary Shittleton, coming from the parlour " for some things 
 which the said Dinah had been left dressing," found that 
 she was not in the kitchen and asked Mrs. French what had 
 become of her. The matron replied that she thought the 
 girl had gone downstairs. Mary called down the well of 
 the stair, and getting no answer proceeded to the shop on 
 the ground floor ; failing to find her there, she went down 
 to the cellar in the basement. As she descended the stair 
 she saw for an instant reflected on the east wall of the 
 cellar the shadow of a figure in the act of leaping from the 
 half-door into the river. The tide was out at the time, and 
 she heard the fall of a body upon the shore beneath. 
 Looking out, she saw Dinah Armstrong lying on the 
 sand upon her side. She called to her several times, 
 but receiving no reply, ran upstairs to alarm the 
 family, (a) The whole household was thrown into the 
 greatest consternation. They rushed down to the cellar, 
 but by that time the girl had disappeared. Neighbours 
 were summoned, the shore was examined, but though the 
 mark made by her body was plainly visible, no further 
 trace of Dinah could be found. " She had leap'd a height 
 
 (a) This is Mary Shiltleton's own account of the aflfair, as given by her at 
 the int[uest. 
 
THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 235 
 
 of about 13 feet, and the place she fell on was distant from 
 the then stream (it being low-water) only four or five 
 yards." There was no sign of her in the river, and a search 
 of the adjacent lanes and of the arches of the bridge yielded 
 no better result. Some boys fishing below the bridge had 
 seen nothing of her. The rest of the day was spent in 
 making fruitless inquiries in the neighbourhood after the 
 missing girl. 
 
 In these circumstances Mr. Oliphant naturally concluded 
 that Dinah had meant to drown herself by jumping into 
 the river, that her design being defeated by the lowness 
 of the tide, she had thought better of her purpose and 
 " escap'd undiscover'd by some of the passages leading from 
 the water side into the town," and that shame prevented 
 her returning to the family. That night word was sent by 
 Mrs. Milne's maid to acquaint her sister, Jane Armstrong, 
 who lived in Newgate Street, Newcastle, of what had 
 happened, and asking whether she knew anything of her, 
 to which the answer returned was in the negative. Next 
 morning Jane appeared in person to inquire into her sister's 
 "departure"; she informed Mrs. Oliphant that another 
 sister, Tamar, lived at Long Benton, 3| miles N.E. of 
 Newcastle, and suggested that Dinah might be there. The 
 following day, Thursday 19th, Jane called with a friend, 
 said she had heard nothing more of Dinah, and desired 
 delivery of her chest and clothes, which was given. As 
 Jane " discover'd no concern " as to Dinah's disappearance, 
 Mrs. Oliphant assumed that she had sufficient reasons of 
 her own for not being unduly anxious : the charges of theft 
 and the attempt at suicide might well dispose the girl's 
 relations to conceal her whereabouts. So for the time the 
 matter rested. 
 
 On the morning of Sunday, 22nd July, Joseph Barlow, 
 a "keelman," called at Mr. Oliphant's house. Mary 
 Shittleton opened the door, and he asked " if Dr. Erskine 
 had a maid that was drowned lately." Mary replied that 
 a maid had been missing since Tuesday, but she hoped she 
 
236 THE HAKD CASE OF Mil. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 was not drowned. Mr. Oliphant then coming to the door, 
 Barlow stated that he and another man had that morning 
 " taken up a woman floating in the middle of the river 
 Tyne," which he had carried ashore at Dunston, l|- miles 
 W. of Gateshead, on the Durham side of the Tyne, "where 
 a number of people employ'd about the coal-works live." 
 From Barlow's description Mr. Oliphant could not be certain 
 that the body was that of the missing girl ; he therefore 
 referred him to her sister Jane as the person most capable 
 of deciding the question. Meanwhile for his own satis- 
 faction he dispatched Mary Shittleton at once to Dunston ; 
 she went, saw the body, and identified it as that of her 
 late companion. With this intelligence Mary returned 
 home, where the news of the hapless Dinah's tragic end 
 was received with great concern. 
 
 Such were the facts, too plain, one would think, to be 
 misconstrued by anybody, upon which public malice and 
 official stupidity were to base a charge of murder against 
 three innocent persons. 
 
 The body, when taken up by Barlow and his fellow - 
 boatman, was laid by them across the gunwale, "the head 
 and shoulders hanging within the boat," and in this posture 
 the head and neck, which before were much sw^ollen though 
 not discoloured, rapidly assumed a dark reddish aspect. 
 " She spung'd at the mouth ; and from a contusion on the 
 back part of her head there appear'd a tittering of bloody 
 matter " (a) — the corpse had been knocked about in the 
 river for five days. She was fully dressed, her stays were 
 laced close, and " the string of her cap quite tight about 
 the neck, the cap hanging behind her head." (6) It is also 
 in evidence that the deceased always wore around her neck 
 a necklace or ribbon. There was noticed on the neck a 
 circular mark, "which at first appeared whiter than the 
 other parts of the skin, but in a short time turn'd into a 
 light purple colour." This mark caught the attention of the 
 
 (a) EvidL-nce of Barlow at tlie trial. (b) Ibid. 
 
THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 237 
 
 gaping idlers who gathered round the body when it was 
 brouoht ashore, and the inference was drawn that the girl 
 had been hanged. This popular belief received scientific 
 sanction from the wisdom of " a young practiser in surgery," 
 who, coming up at the time, expressed his confident 
 opinion that the deceased had been strangled, of which in 
 his judgment the mark on the neck afforded clear and 
 indisputable proof Wild rumours as to the supposed 
 circumstances attending Dinah Armstrong's disappearance 
 quickly spread abroad ; and as there is always a sufficient 
 number of charitable persons ready to take the worst 
 possible view of their neighbours' actions, the general voice 
 did not scruple to denounce her master and mistress as the 
 murderers. These reports reached the Oliphant family 
 who, though much distressed and justly indignant, were 
 unable to do anything to confute them. 
 
 On Monday, 23rd July, Tamar Armstrong called at 
 the house for the purpose of venting "the most scurrilous 
 abuse and threats " against the whole family, upon whose 
 subsequent fortunes the insensate wrath of this vituperative 
 virgin was destined to have a fatal effect. 
 
 On Tuesday, 24th, John Robson, Esq., one of the 
 Coroners for the County of Durham — " not the Coroner of 
 Newcastle, whose province it was" — came to Dunston to 
 hold an inquest, and a jury was empannelled " out of the 
 lowest people in the place, all strongly infected by the 
 popular prejudice." So virulent, indeed, was the contagion 
 that, as we shall see, even the coroner himself was not 
 immune. The court constituted, a constable was dis- 
 patched with a summons to Mary Shittleton to attend 
 and give evidence. By this officer Mr. Oliphant sent a 
 civil message to the coroner, tendering himself and his 
 family as witnesses if required, but no notice was taken of 
 his offer. Mr. John Green, whom the reader may remember 
 as the friendly admonisher of Dinah, attended voluntarily ; 
 but though his evidence was highly pertinent to the inquiry, 
 the coroner rejected it and refused to take his deposition, 
 
238 THE HAED CASE OF MR. JAMES OLTPHANT 
 
 for no better reason, as appears, than that it was favourable 
 to the OHphants. Mr. Oliphant was nowise anxious as to 
 the issue, believing that a magistrate and jury, solemnly 
 en<rao-ed in the elucidation of the truth, would discounten- 
 ance all malevolent gossip. That afternoon, however, 
 certain friends called, and strongly advised him to go 
 personally to Dunston " to justify himself from the 
 calumnious aspersions thrown out against him." Accord- 
 ingly, accompanied by Henry Thompson, the resident 
 patient, and by John Weatherburn, one of the neighbours 
 called in upon discovery of the occurrence, Mr. Oliphant 
 set forth. When he reached Dunston "he experienced 
 all the insolence of an enraged mob, and with difficulty 
 preserved his person from violence." Having at length 
 obtained speech with the coroner he gave that functionary 
 " a detail of the whole affair relative to the Deceas'd, so far 
 as he or any of his family had any knowledge." When he 
 had finished his statement the coroner observed : " Very 
 well, Sir; pray, what is all this to me? You should go 
 talk to the Jury." Mr. Oliphant found that impartial 
 tribunal, who were then considering their verdict, " stand- 
 ing by a hedge in the open air, surrounded by a crowd of 
 people who frequently intermixed with them." " It may be, 
 Gentlemen," said he, " you have not yet chosen a Foreman ; 
 no matter, I will, with your leave, and as Mr. Coroner has 
 referred me to you, speak to you all." He then attempted 
 to repeat what he knew of the business, but was prevented 
 by the interruption of the mob, of whom Tamar and Jane 
 Armstrong were moving spirits, "busied in inflaming the 
 populace." The gentle Tamar denounced him as "a 
 murdering dog," and subjected him to much vile oppro- 
 brium. Finding it impossible to obtain a hearing, Mr. 
 Oliphant returned to the coroner and requested that his 
 deposition, with those of Thompson and Weatherburn, 
 might formally be taken. This the coroner refused to do, 
 saying it was not necessary. Mr. Oliphant then insisted 
 upon knowing of what he was accused. The coroner 
 
THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 239 
 
 replied : "I. He was charg'd with confining the Deceas'd in 
 his cellar from the Friday till the Tuesday. II. That 
 when she leap'd out at the cellar window no measures 
 were taken to find her. III. That when Barlow came to 
 acquaint him with his having found a woman drown'd, he 
 (Mr. Oliphant) threw the door in his face and bid him 
 begone. IV. That he had not sent for him (the coroner) 
 as was incumbent on him." Further, that the deceased's 
 neck bore marks of strangulation. These four allegations 
 Mr. Oliphant offered instantly to disprove by the sworn 
 evidence of himself, his wife, Mary Shittleton, Thompson, 
 Weatherburn and several other responsible persons, whose 
 testimony would clearly demonstrate their utter falsity. 
 As to the marks of strangulation, he could prove that the 
 girl left his house alive and well ; he was neither able nor 
 obliged to account for any marks of violence appearing on 
 her body when found. But despite all that he could urge, 
 the coroner absolutely refused to take the evidence either 
 of Mr. Oliphant or of his witnesses. That gentleman 
 waited at Dunston with his friends till six o'clock, when 
 they sent to ask whether the coroner "had any occasion 
 for them." The reply was, that he had not; so they went 
 home in ignorance of the jury's finding. 
 
 From the oflicial record of the proceedings at this 
 remarkable inquiry it appears that the depositions of the 
 only five persons examined were to the following effect. 
 Jane Armstrong stated that on Monday, 16th July, she 
 visited her sister Dinah, who was " very dull and heavy, 
 and look'd down and said nothing." Returning later in 
 the week, Jane was told by Mrs. Oliphant that Green had 
 been sent for to "threaten" Dinah about some missing 
 linen, of which she denied all knowledge. Mrs. Oliphant 
 reported Dinah as saying, "I'm going downstairs, but I 
 won't stay." After the disappearance, Mary Shittleton 
 told witness that Dinah had been confined all the Tuesday 
 forenoon. Mary said that she saw her, after leaping from 
 the window, " rise up and run." They thought she had 
 
240 THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 " got upon the jettys of the bridge," and some men were 
 sent to look for her. 
 
 Thomasine Ehvell stated that on the afternoon of the 
 23rd (the day after the body was found) she was in Mr. 
 Oliphant's surgery. Mrs. Oliphant remarked "that it [the 
 aifair] was the greatest trouble that ever came to her family, 
 and further said that she did it [her expostulation] to a 
 good end, in hopes of reclaiming her and screening it [the 
 theft]." Mrs. Oliphant also said that three sheets and a 
 tablecloth were missing, and " that she had her there from 
 the Friday before to the Tuesday till she did that wicked 
 deed." 
 
 Mary Shittleton, examined, gave the account of her 
 connection with the affair which I have already narrated. 
 
 Jane Greeves stated that, three weeks before, she met 
 upon the quayside Dinah Armstrong, who said she was in 
 Mrs. Oliphant's service and was very well. On Monday, 
 23rd, witness accompanied Jane Armstrong when the latter 
 called to ask Mrs. Oliphant "what she had to lay to the 
 charge of the said Dinah." That lady informed them of 
 the finding of Mrs. Heath's sheet, and said that she herself 
 had missed some linen ; but Dinah had begged her not to 
 tell her relations. Witness then went to Mrs. Milne, who 
 said she had lost three dam.ask napkins, " but she did not 
 blame her, the said Dinah, for them. "(a) 
 
 Robert Somerville, surgeon in Swalwell, stated that he 
 was ordered by the coroner to inspect the body. "I 
 found," said he, " as follows : she had a circular mark on 
 her neck about half an inch in breadth, which has been 
 made (to my judgment) by a rope, or might have been 
 done by a ribband, necklace or the like nature, but there 
 was no such thing found upon her neck when taken up. 
 Her face was quite black, occasioned by a stagnation of the 
 blood, which is a concomitant of strangling or suffocation." 
 He observed no other appearances of violence. 
 
 (a) Yet the whole trouble was caused by that lady's inveteracy in the luatler 
 of the napkins. 
 
THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAIMES OLIPHANT 241 
 
 We have not the advantage of knowing in what manner 
 Mr. Coroner Kobson summed up this evidence for the 
 guidance of the jury. He must have been an expert in the 
 art of brick-making without straw, for the amazing result 
 at which that body arrived was this : " The Jurors do upon 
 their oath find and say, that James Oliphant, Margaret 
 OHphant, and Mary Shittleton, with force and arms, in the 
 cellar of the dwelling-house of the said James Oliphant at 
 Gateshead in the county of Durham, feloniously, wilfully, 
 and of their malice aforethought did strangle and suffocate 
 Dinah Armstrong with a certain cord of the value of 
 sixpence.) And so the Jurors aforesaid, upon their oath 
 aforesaid, do say, that the said James Oliphant, Margaret 
 Oliphant, and Mary Shittleton, her the said Dinah Arm- 
 strong, in manner and by the means aforesaid, wilfully, 
 feloniously, and of their malice aforethought, did kill and 
 murder." Thus, with magnificent disregard to the proved 
 facts, in the words of Hamlet's clown, " The crowner hath 
 sat on her, and finds it Christian burial." 
 
 In his comments on these strange doings Mr. Oliphant 
 justly points out that the evidence of the first four 
 witnesses contains nothing against either him or his family. 
 The verdict, therefore, must have proceeded solely upon the 
 evidence of the surgeon. That expert allowed that the 
 mark on the neck might have been caused by a ribbon or 
 necklace, but said that nothing of the kind was found upon 
 her. Had the coroner's zeal for truth prompted him to 
 examine Barlow and Southeron, the men who discovered 
 the body, they could have told him, as they afterwards did 
 another jury, " that the Deceas'd when found had a hand- 
 kerchief about her neck, and a cap tied under her chin with 
 tape or a small string. "(«) We know, too, from Mary 
 Shittleton that Dinah habitually wore a ribbon round her 
 throat. As for the discoloration of the face being " a 
 concomitant of strangling," Mr. Oliphant, himself a surgeon, 
 
 (a) Evidence of Barlow and SoulliL-nni at tlic trial. 
 
 16 
 
242 THE HARD CASE OF MR JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 remarks that the body had been in the water for five days, 
 that the stays were laced tight, and that an accidental 
 ligature was about the neck— facts amply sufficient to 
 account for such post-mortem appearances. Further, it 
 was proved that lividity occurred only after the body was 
 laid across the boat with the head hanging downwards, and 
 after being for some time exposed to the open air. Mr. 
 Somerville found no other marks of violence, yet Barlow 
 afterwards swore to an injury upon the back of the head — " a 
 bloody matter tittering out like froth. "(a) Some of the jury 
 later declared that their intention had been merely to find a 
 verdict of murder, and not against any particular person. (6) 
 But the coroner had no use for such fine distinctions. 
 
 The position of Mr. Oliphant and his wife was grossly 
 prejudiced by the involving of Mary Shittleton in the 
 charge, for thus the lips of their most important witness 
 were sealed and they themselves deprived of the inestimable 
 benefit of her testimony. No motive was suggested for the 
 alleged crime, no provocation given by the deceased, no 
 malice or sudden passion shown by the accused. That the 
 members of a reputable family should voluntarily combine 
 to destroy a poor servant girl for no conceivable reason and 
 by so unlikely a means as strangling, is, even allowing for 
 the eccentricities of human conduct, sufficiently improbable 
 to call for the clearest proof 
 
 Early next morning John Crozier the constable, with two 
 concurrents, came to Mr. Oliphant's house with a warrant 
 by the coroner for the arrest of the accused. The three 
 prisoners were conveyed to Durham, and as a preliminary 
 to being lodged in gaol were, at Mr. Oliphant's request, 
 taken before the coroner in the Bishop's Palace, where that 
 remarkable official resided, " he being household steward 
 to his Lordship." "What brings you before me ? " asked 
 the coroner haughtily, " Do you know your case is not 
 bailable ? " To which Mr. Oliphant replied, " We come 
 
 (a) Evidence of Barlow at the trial. 
 
 (b) Affidavits of Weatherburn and Green. 
 
THE HAED CASE OF ME. JAMES OLIPHANT 243 
 
 here in the light of murderers, in consequence of" your 
 proceedings and warrant, and we know that our case, as 
 you have made it, is not bailable ; but I desire that bail 
 may be taken for my wife." He then tendered the 
 evidence of Dr. Wilson of Newcastle, who was present, 
 prepared to certify as to the state of that lady's health and 
 the grave consequences likely to result from her confine- 
 ment in gaol. Some other friends of the prisoner there- 
 upon offered to enter into recognizances for any amount 
 that might be required, but the incorruptible magistrate 
 repeated that he could accept no bail and would commit 
 all the accused to prison. Mr. Oliphant said he was not 
 surprised, after the treatment he had already experienced. 
 "You are warm. Sir," retorted the coroner. "I have great 
 reason to be so," rejoined the prisoner; "the misfortunes 
 I now experience and foresee, in consequence of your 
 behaviour as a magistrate, are of the most serious nature 
 and of the most afflicting kind, and such, if I may be 
 allowed to judge, as you can never sufficiently repair. 
 My peace, character and fortune are not only materially 
 afiected, but likewise my liberty and life ; and what is still 
 more the life of my wife, whose tender frame and con- 
 stitution render her very unfit to sustain the shocks she 
 hath already felt and those that are likely to follow." 
 This dignified rebuke had some efiect upon the coroner, 
 who, apparently thinking that his zeal might be carrying 
 him too far, finally allowed the prisoners to go home, there 
 to remain in charge of a constable until their trial at the 
 forthcoming assizes. 
 
 Their situation was, in Mr. Oliphant's forcible phrase, 
 " replete with horror." To the mental agony caused by 
 the monstrous accusation under which they lay were joined 
 " the sudden stop put to his practice, particularly from the 
 country," the grievous injury done to his wife's health, 
 and what was to prove the fatal effect upon his father-in- 
 law, then " labouring under the complicated pangs of 
 bodily distress and anguish of mind." In these manifold 
 
244 THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 misfortunes Mr. Olipbant was sustained as well by the 
 sympathy and support of his personal friends, as by the 
 confident hope that his innocence would soon be clearly 
 manifested to the world. 
 
 The Durham Assizes, presided over by the Hon. Mr. 
 Justice Bathurst,(a) opened on 13th August 1764, and 
 the prisoners were now in gaol awaiting their deliverance. 
 The fourth day of the assizes came, and yet no bill 
 of indictment was laid before the grand jury. Mr. 
 Oliphant's witnesses, who had been in attendance since 
 the opening of the court, were thus put to much incon- 
 venience. This delay was, he says, due to the action of 
 the coroner, who, having constituted himself " sollicitor 
 in the prosecution," was busy beating up evidence against 
 the prisoners ; " he had gone a-hunting into the country 
 after witnesses other than those who were examined on the 
 inquest." The gross impropriety of these proceedings well 
 warrants Mr. Oliphant's strictures upon them. Not till 
 the 17th, the last day of the sittings, was the bill of indict- 
 ment presented to the grand jury, who found it to be a 
 true bill ; and in the afternoon of the same day the trial 
 of the prisoners began. Judging by the bag, the coroner 
 must have had but poor sport in the country, for the 
 quality of the birds was no better than those which he had 
 brought down at Dunston. 
 
 The first witness, John Southeron, who had helped to 
 land the body, narrated the facts with which we are now 
 familiar. When taken into the boat on the Sunday, 
 *' blood came out of her nose and mouth ; her face and 
 neck were black, with a circular white mark, half an inch 
 broad, like the mark of a cord or of something tied round 
 her neck tight." He did not see the body stripped. On 
 the Tuesday the face and neck were blacker. He was one 
 
 (a) Henry Bathurst (1714-1794), Solicitor-General lo the Prince of Wales, 
 1745 ; led for the Crown in the prosecution of Mary Blandy, 1752 ; Judge of the 
 Court of Common Pleas, 1754; Lord Chancellor, 1771 ; succeeded his father as 
 Earl Biithurst, 1775 ; and in the following year presided as Lord High Steward 
 at the trial of the Duchess of Kingston. He resigned the Seal in 1778. 
 
THE HAED CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 245 
 
 of the jury on the inquest that day. Next Joseph Barlow, 
 his partner, told the same tale. When he announced to 
 Mary Shittleton the finding of the body " the maid seemed 
 no way surprized." The deceased's cap was hanging behind 
 her head, tied under her chin with a tape or a small string. 
 Robert Somerville, surgeon, repeated the evidence he gave 
 at the inquest. Had the deceased been hanged on Tuesday 
 and lain in the water till Sunday he did not think any 
 blood could have come from the body. It might have so 
 swelled in the water that any ligature on the neck would 
 occasion the mark ; " the necklace or ribbon might have 
 broke." Jane Armstrong repeated, with unimportant 
 variations, her former evidence. After the examination 
 of three new witnesses, who had seen the body but had 
 nothing material to say, Sarah Ward stated that on 
 Sunday, 22nd July, she met Mary Shittleton on her way 
 to Dunston to view the body. To her Mary gave the same 
 account of what had happened as she did at the inquest, 
 but added that if she should find the body to be Dinah's 
 " she was to turn about her foot and make no discovery." 
 Jane Greaves and Thomasine Elwell, examined, had 
 nothing to add to their previous testimony. Tamar 
 Armstrong described her visit to Mrs. Oliphant and the 
 account given to her by that lady of Dinah's disappearance. 
 The facts, when stated on oath, did not justify Tamar's 
 extrajudicial gloss upon them. This closed the Crown case. 
 The defence called two witnesses only. Henry 
 Thompson stated that he had lived as a patient in the 
 doctor's house since June. All Tuesday forenoon, 17th 
 July, he saw Dinah going about her ordinary work, and 
 several times she went out of doors. She was under no 
 restraint or confinement whatever. He then described the 
 alarm when the family were at dinner, and the measures 
 taken to find the missing girl. She was always kindly 
 treated by the family, he never saw the least ill usage. 
 Margaret French stated how she came to be in the 
 kitchen that day ; Dinah was at full liberty, going about 
 
246 THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHANT 
 
 her business as usual. She seemed very dull. Witness 
 gave the same account as Mary Shittleton of what after- 
 wards happened. No further record of the proceedings 
 is available, Mr. Oliphant here concluding his report by 
 stating that " the prisoners were immediately acquitted 
 to the entire satisfaction of the whole court." 
 
 Upon the prisoners' acquittal Mr. Oliphant asked leave 
 to address the Court. He hoped that the law provided 
 some means of redress for the enormous injuries, losses 
 and expense he had sustained by that prosecution, and 
 also for the punishment of the coroner, who had led him 
 into those fatal proceedings by refusing to hear evidence 
 on the inquest and by other misbehaviour. Mr. Justice 
 Bathurst replied that these matters were not then regu- 
 larly before the Court, but he suggested that Mr. Oliphant 
 should take opinion of counsel as to his proper remedy. 
 "I am sorry for your misfortune," continued his Lordship, 
 "and believe you to be as innocent of the crime laid to 
 your charge as myself." The Court then rose. 
 
 Shortly after his release Mr. Oliphant addressed to the 
 Lord Bishop of Durham a letter calling his attention to 
 the conduct of his steward in the capacity of coroner, and 
 submitting that that person " ought to render what repara- 
 tion lay in his power for the injuries sustained from his 
 abuse of office." His Lordship took no notice of this 
 appeal, and the unjust steward was not called to account. 
 Mr. Oliphant next consulted several eminent lawyers as to 
 the best means of bringing his oppressor to book. The 
 learned gentlemen advised appHcation to the Court of 
 King's Bench for an information against the coroner, upon 
 affidavits verifying the facts, which were prepared accord- 
 ingly. In these, Mr. Oliphant, after dealhig fully with 
 the whole circumstances, stated that the expenses of the 
 defence amounted to over £90; that his practice had 
 severely suffered — "a great many people having since 
 refused or declined to employ or have any dealings with 
 this deponent " ; and that his wife was ill of a nervous 
 
THE HAKD CASE OF ME. JAMES OLIPHANT 247 
 
 fever, owing to the anxiety and trouble of mind she had 
 undergone. John Weatherburn and John Green swore to 
 the rejection by the coroner of evidence amply sufficient 
 to rebut the charge, and that to their knowledge the jury 
 were influenced or intimidated by him. Crozier the 
 constable corroborated the evidence of the others as to 
 way in which the inquest was conducted. Thomasine 
 Elwell denied that Mrs. Oliphant had ever said she had 
 confined Dinah in the cellar ; if anything appeared in her 
 deposition to that efiect, it was a misrepresentation of the 
 truth and contrary to her meaning. 
 
 In September 1764 Mr. Oliphant gave notice to the 
 coroner of his intention to exhibit a complaint against him 
 to the Court of King's Bench, and in Michaelmas Term 
 following counsel moved upon the affidavits for an informa- 
 tion. The Court refused the motion and referred Mr. 
 Oliphant to the Grand Jury, " as the subject matter of the 
 complaint appear'd to be more proper by way of indictment 
 in the county." From this course, however, and from the 
 alternative one of a special action for damages, which his 
 legal advisers deemed " very proper and eligible," Mr. 
 Oliphant was finally dissuaded, the sole certain result for 
 him of such proceedings being further expense. " A con- 
 siderable part of my small fortune," he writes, " the fruits 
 of years of honest industry, the provision of a numerous 
 rising family, dissipated in a necessary defence and 
 ineffectual endeavours to obtain redress : my business 
 greatly reduced ; my reputation sullied ; my peace of mind 
 deeply wounded ; my wife's health much impaired ; and to 
 complete my afflictions, deprived of the kindest and best of 
 fathers, who after languishing a few months in all the bitter- 
 ness of sorrow, fell a victim to his too great sensibility of the 
 injuries of his son : these are some of the triumphs of my per- 
 secutors, a few of the long train of evils that have resulted 
 from this most oppressive prosecution, the effects whereof I 
 must severely feel to the last moment of my life." (a) 
 
 (a) The Case of Mr. James Oliphant, pp. v-vi. 
 
248 THE HAED CASE OF MR. JAMES OLTPHANT 
 
 After three years' further struggle with misfortune Mr. 
 Oliphant, in the " ruinous " state of his affairs, was moved 
 to appeal to an impartial world, and " with an unreserved 
 confidence in the justice of the public," to print and publish 
 in 1768 a full statement of his wrongs. One hopes that it 
 met with a large sale and was the means of engaging in 
 behalf of its unhappy author the practical sympathy of 
 his countrymen. Mr. Oliphant notes in his introduction 
 the remarkable parallel between his case and the con- 
 temporaneous one of Jean Galas (1761-1765), that historic 
 instance of judicial error which in its day made as much 
 noise as L Affaire Dreyfus. "The misfortunes of the 
 parties in both cases," he writes, " took their rise from one 
 of the family's committing an act of suicide. In our case 
 the accident happen'd while the family was sitting quietly 
 at dinner ; in their's, whilst at supper. With each a 
 stranger friend was present, and both families equally 
 unsuspicious and ignorant of what was passing. The father 
 and relations of the son, the master and mistress of the 
 servant — persons whom of all others in the eye of cool 
 reason ought not to have been suspected — were the first 
 persons positively charg'd with the murder of the deceas'd 
 parties. A servant maid in each family was by the officers 
 of justice made a party in the alledg'd crime, and the 
 accus'd thereby depriv'd of the benefit of their respective 
 evidence. The uncharitable and false reports of an infatu- 
 ated multitude, notwithstanding their absurdity, gave rise 
 in both cases to suspicion and afterwards to the prosecution 
 of the parties. The groundless opinion of a surgeon in 
 each case serv'd to corroborate the ridiculous notions of 
 the populace, and gain credit to the fantasies of prejudice 
 and delusion. The Capitoul of Tholouse [Magistrate of 
 Toulouse] appears to have been much akin both in office 
 and complexion to our Coroner. The proceedings and 
 errours of these officers proved ruinous to the respective 
 parties. Fortunately for our fellow-subjects they were 
 tried before judges of different understandings from the 
 
THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIRHANT 249 
 
 judges at Tholouse, otherwise the catastrophy might have 
 been equally fatal, and the one case made a complete 
 counterpart of the other." (a) 
 
 Jean Galas was a respectable draper of Toulouse. He, 
 his wife, and two of his sons, Marc-Antoine and Pierre, 
 were Protestants; his servant, Jeanne Viguier, was a 
 Catholic. On the evening of 13th October 1761 the 
 family supped together, a youth named Francois Lavaysse 
 being of the party. After supper Marc-Antoine, a gloomy 
 and profligate young Calvinist, embittered by the failure, 
 on relic^ious grounds, of his ambition to become an avocat, 
 and disgusted with the mercantile pursuit which he was 
 compelled to follow, went out, like Judas, and hanged 
 himself. Unfortunately for their fate, when the others 
 discovered his body hanging behind the door in the 
 paternal shop, they cut it down, and for the protection 
 of the family honour agreed to conceal the fact of the 
 suicide. A doctor was summoned, who declared that 
 death was due to strangling. As Protestants in a city 
 violently Catholic the Galas were unpopular with the 
 faithful of the neighbourhood ; a rumour arose that these 
 heretics had slain their son in order to prevent him from 
 turning Catholic. This view was vehemently espoused by 
 the capitoul charged with the investigation, one David de 
 Beaudrigue, in whom Mr. Oliphant descries a strong 
 resemblance to Mr. Coroner Robson. This magistrate's 
 conduct of the case, however, was even more prejudiced 
 and illegal. The five persons in the house were arrested, 
 loaded with chains, and charged with murdering Marc- 
 Antoine in the interest of Protestant fanaticism. They 
 then told the truth about the matter, but it availed them 
 nothing. Marc-Antoine was buried with high solemnity; 
 the Church treated him as a martyr, the feithful considered 
 him a saint, miracles were wrought at his tomb. "The 
 author of this account," writes George Borrow m his 
 report of the affair, "has an a ttested case of a young man 
 
 (a) The Case of Mr. James Oliphant, pp. ix-x. 
 
250 THE HARD CASE OF MR. JAMES OLIPHA.NT 
 
 who lost the use of his understanding by remaining all 
 night in prayer on the tomb of this new saint, and not 
 obtaining any of the miracles which he implored. "(a) 
 One conceives the young man's understanding as from the 
 first not of the strongest. Meanwhile the capitoul, in the 
 absence of all proof of guilt, ordered that the most rigorous 
 torture should be applied to the three Galas, and that the 
 friend and the servant should be "presented to torture" 
 with a view, as appears, to the quickening of their 
 imagination. Though despite this atrocious treatment 
 they all persistently maintained their innocence, the 
 Toulouse Parliament sentenced Jean Galas to death, and 
 after undergoing torture ordinary and extraordinary, he 
 was finally, on 10th March 1762, broken alive upon the 
 wheel. Pierre was banished for life, the charge against 
 Madame Galas and young Lavaysse was found not proven, 
 and the maid, as a good Catholic, was acquitted. The 
 vindication of this hapless family was ultimately effected 
 by the unremitting efforts of Voltaire, who played in 
 L' Affaire Colas the part later taken by Zola in L Affaire 
 Dreyfus. Two years after the judicial murder of Galas 
 the King's Privy Council annulled the decision of the 
 Toulouse Parliament; and on 9th March 1765, the third 
 anniversary of Jean Galas' condemnation, his family, friend 
 and servant were upon a new trial formally " rehabilitated," 
 and their names erased from the criminal registers of 
 France. It is satisfactory to learn that the capitoul de 
 Beaudrigue, being dismissed from office, became insane and 
 committed suicide, and that Louis the Fifteenth gave the 
 survivors a grant of 30,000 francs. In these respects, as 
 Mr. Oliphant points out, the parallel is incomplete; the 
 English coroner went unpunished and George the Third 
 did nothing to indemnify the victims of his stupidity and 
 spite. But then, on the other hand, the case of Galas was 
 even a harder one than Mr. Oliphant's. 
 
 (a) Celebrated Trials, 1825, iv. 456. 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN : 
 
 LORD BRAXriELD'S LAST CASE 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN : 
 
 LOP.D BRAXFIELD'S LAST CASE. 
 
 " You're a young gentleman that doesna approve of Caapital Punish- 
 ment," said Hermiston, " Weel, I'm an auld man that does." 
 
 — Weir of Hermiston. 
 
 UNLH^E the roycal pair In Old Testament story whose 
 fate King David so touchingly laments, the subject of 
 this insignificant biography was neither lovely nor pleasant 
 in his life, and in his death he was divided — by the knife of 
 a professor of anatomy. The crime for which he thus so 
 suitably suffered lacks those elements, whether of romance 
 or mystery, which sometimes lend a factitious attraction to 
 the ugliest of deeds, and the criminal himself was as canting 
 and cruel a scoundrel as ever occupied a rope. But on the 
 other hand, there are in his case certain circumstances that 
 move me to evoke for a world comfortably ignorant of his 
 existence, his evil and repulsive image. It was his good 
 fortune to be the last man hanged by Lord Braxfield. The 
 dramatic quality of his capture in the delectable Isle of 
 Arran, while attempting to shun the embraces of "the 
 widow with the wooden legs " ; the curious narrative of 
 his career, afterwards published "as taken from his own 
 mouth" in Glasgow Tolbooth, five days before his execu- 
 tion ; the interest which the crime aroused in the mind of 
 Sir Walter Scott, who, as we shall see, was present at the 
 trial and actually interviewed the murderer; the sinister 
 and striking picture by John Kay of the prisoner as he 
 appeared at the bar — these are for me matters sufficiently 
 inviting, and will, I trust, by the reader be held to extenuate 
 the act. 
 
 When Robert Louis Stevenson was busy fashioning 
 from the dry bones of the historic Braxfield the grandly 
 
 253 
 
254 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 vital figure of his own Justice-Clerk, he wrote on 1st 
 December 1892 to his friend Mr. Charles Baxter: "I wish 
 Pitcairn's ' Criminal Trials ' quam primum. Also, an 
 absolutely correct text of the Scots judiciary oath. Also, 
 in case Pitcairn does not come down late enough, I wish 
 as full a report as possible of a Scotch murder trial' between 
 1790-1820. \JndiQX&tdind., the fullest j)ossihle.'\a) Pitcairn, 
 duly despatched to the Pacific, was read "from end to end 
 with vast improvement " ; but, alas ! he did not come down 
 late enough, his invaluable collection terminating with the 
 reign of our sixth James, and I have often wondered what 
 printed report, if any, Mr. Baxter sent out to Vailima. It 
 would preferably be one of a trial at which Lord Braxfield 
 himself presided, but reports of these are few. By far the 
 best and most instructive, that of Deacon Brodie in 1788, 
 is not a murder case; that of Major Kinloch in 1795 is 
 only technically such, the accused having been insane when 
 he committed the fatal act. Nor could the present case, 
 even had a report of it been available, have claimed the 
 high distinction of subserving the author's use, as that of 
 James Stewart of the Glen had earlier so admirably done in 
 the matter of David Balfour's experiences. It dealt, indeed, 
 with murder, it occurred in 1796, and it was the last, so far 
 as I am aware, which was tried by Lord Braxfield before 
 that mighty frame began to crumble beneath the onslaughts 
 of disease. No separate report was published, and beyond 
 the official record in the Books of Adjournal we have but 
 the accounts given in the contemporary local press. (6) 
 Further, there was no defence, the pannel judicially con- 
 fessing his guilt; and the Crown led evidence only "in 
 order to satisfy the Court and the country," and to warrant 
 the jury's verdict. 
 
 It is idle though pleasant to speculate upon how 
 Stevenson proposed to turn the " kittle " legal corner in 
 
 (a) Letters to His Family and Friends, ii. 273-274. 
 
 (6) Edinburgh Evening) Gourant and Caledonian Mercury, 15th December 1796 ; 
 Scots Magazine, vol. 58, p. 863. 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 255 
 
 the plot of his half-told tale. Trial scenes in fiction have 
 rarely been -successful ; even the supreme example, that 
 of Effie Deans, shows here and there some traces of the 
 limelight. From the letter to Mr. Baxter before cited it is 
 plain that despite the scantness of his professional equip- 
 ment the writer well knew that Lord Hermiston could not 
 himself preside at Archie Weir's trial. "The Justice- 
 Clerk tries some people capitally on circuit," he continues. 
 ''Certain evidence cropping' up, the charge is transferred 
 to the J.-C.'s own son. Of course, in the next trial the 
 J.-C. is excluded, (a) and the case is called before the 
 Lord Justice-General. Where would the trial have to 
 be ? I fear in Edinburgh, which would not suit my 
 view. Could it be again at the circuit town?" As Sir 
 Sidney Colvin has told us, the point was submitted to 
 Mr. Graham Murray, now Lord Dunedin, who was of 
 opinion that the second trial might take place at the 
 circuit town before two Lords of Justiciary, and that the 
 Justice-General, who was then a layman and but nomin- 
 ally the head of the Court, would have nothing to do 
 with it. Whereupon Stevenson wrote, " Graham Murray's 
 note re the venue was highly satisfactory, and did me all 
 the good in the world." The precedent of Argyll presiding 
 ^ at the Appin murder trial in 1752 would seem to have 
 been disregarded. Personally I think that the " people " 
 who were to be tried first by Lord Hermiston for the 
 murder of Frank Innes at the Weaver's Stone, were the 
 Four Black Brothers of the Cauldstaneslap ; that their 
 acquittal following upon new evidence pointing to Archie's 
 guilt, the Justice-Clerk granted a warrant for his son's 
 arrest, and in doing so pronounced his own doom ; and 
 that the next trial, at which Archie would be convicted, 
 was held before Lords Glenalmond and Glenkindie. That 
 Archie should be confined in the local county jail was 
 
 (a) At a late dramatic production iu Edinburgh of JVeir of Hermiston the 
 trial scene,, in which the father condL-inns his son to death, proved curiously 
 unreal and ineffective, and spoilt a performance iu other respects commendable. 
 
256 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 essential to his successful rescue by the Four Black Brothers, 
 who — as their creator divulged in a letter to Sir James 
 Barrie — were to " break prison " in his behalf. The Tol- 
 booth of Edinburgh had been broken once for all by Scott. 
 Stevenson was too fine an artist to renew the attack, 
 though he might try a crack at Portanferry ; hence his 
 relief on counsel's favourable opinion. All this, however, 
 is beside the present purpose, and like Lord Hermiston 
 " I must get to my plew-stilts." 
 
 Autobiography, even under conditions the most fortunate, 
 is a difficult art. It must choose between showing the 
 author as he really is, or as he believes himself to be, or 
 as he would fain hope that he appears to others. At best, 
 as I say, h ticklish business ; but pursued by one in the 
 invidious situation of a convicted murderer and executed 
 — appropriate term ! — in the condemned cell, beneath the 
 very shadow of the scaffold, an enterprise from which the 
 stoutest and most foolhardy might recoil. Yet did David 
 Haggart of adventurous memory, to whom I have else- 
 where paid a modest tribute, produce in circumstances 
 thus forbidding a work now regarded by all but namby- 
 pamby criticism as a classic of its kind. Through his brave 
 young pages blows much the same highway breeze as that 
 which keeps green and gracious the inimitable Beggars 
 Opey^a. The writer with whom we have to deal, however, 
 though so greatly older and more experienced than his 
 criminous successor, and in all respects the riper rascal, has 
 nothing of his junior's charm. A cold-blooded hypocrite, 
 certainly guilty of one, and probably of two more murders, 
 he interests in another way. A glance at their respective 
 portraits — David's drawn by himself in his cell, M'Kean's 
 by Kay at the trial — shows how little, even of wickedness, 
 they have in common. The one was, regrettably, a rogue ; 
 the other, merely an unmitigated rufiJian. 
 
 " The Life of James M'Kaen, (a) Shoemaker in Glasgow, 
 
 (a) So spelt by the owner and his publishers. I have preferred throughout 
 the more usual form. 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 257 
 
 who was executed at the Cross of Glasgow on Wednesday 
 the 25 th Jan. 1797, for the Murder and Robbery of James 
 Buchanan, the Lanark Carrier," a little book of seventy- 
 one pages, issued in Glasgow by Brash and Reid, is the 
 sole account we have of its author's history. Designed for 
 edification, it was dictated by him in Glasgow Tolbooth 
 and published at his own request, as a " full, accurate and 
 authentic " memoir. While in Edinburgh Tolbooth, being 
 " continually tormented by the turnkey and others to write 
 a History of My Life,'' he had agreed to be " interviewed," 
 but so little was he satisfied with the result that he 
 petitioned the Magistrates to prevent publication of the 
 Edinburgh document, he having been "in a perfect phrenzy 
 or delirium when it was taken down." Possibly his Glasgow 
 publishers were the parties most interested. Anyhow, the 
 Edinburgh " Life " was suppressed and Brash and Beid's 
 volume had the field to itself. 
 
 James M'Kean, who at the time of his trial was aged 
 forty-four, was born in the Gallowgate of Glasgow. His 
 father died when he was a child, his mother married again, 
 and on her second widowhood espoused, with unfortunate 
 results, a journeyman shoemaker. This gentleman, whom 
 she set up in business as a master craftsman, having abused 
 her generosity for a season, subsequently " ran off to 
 Dalkeith, carrying with him all the effects he could come 
 at." James, then ten years old, was bound apprentice to 
 a shoemaker. The deserted lady had still invested for 
 the boy's education a small sum of money which the 
 fugitive had overlooked. He therefore wrote professing 
 penitence, prevailed upon her to join him in Dalkeith, 
 and there tried to persuade her to " lift up " the fund and 
 apply it to his own use. Finding her maternal instinct 
 stronger than her sense of wifely duty he again absconded, 
 this time for good and all. Bereft of the benefit of his 
 stepfather's counsel and guidance the young M'Kean 
 continued his apprenticeship until, his master failing in 
 business, his indenture was transferred to a shoemaker in 
 
 17 
 
258 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 Dalkeith. Before the expiry of his time, however, he ran 
 away from home, taking with him, presumably for re- 
 membrance, " some few articles and one shilling," the 
 property of his mother, from which it would seem that 
 his stepfather's example had not been wholly thrown away. 
 M'Kean made his way to Lanark, where he remained two 
 years working at his trade. His mother meanwhile had 
 prospered, having then a considerable business in selling 
 smallwares, so the absentee thought it worth his while to 
 go home and was welcomed after the usual fashion of 
 returned prodigals. To his mother's folly in fitting him 
 out " genteelly as to apparel " and allowing him too much 
 liberty and pocket-money he attributes the taste for loose 
 company which ultimately led to his undoing. 
 
 M'Kean courted for some time " a sober young girl of 
 the neighbourhood," to whom he made oath that nothing 
 but death should part them. Wearying of her charms, he 
 determined to break with her ; so he took her one day 
 by a lane where lay a dead horse, and as she stood looking 
 at it he went to the other side of the body, pointing out 
 " that his vow was now entirely broken, for death had 
 made a total separation between them." The quaintness 
 of this conceit was so little appreciated by the damsel 
 that " she fell into a fever which nearly deprived her of 
 life." His mother now wanted him to marry a certain 
 dame "for the sake of a trifling sum of which she was 
 possessed," but whether he deemed the consideration in- 
 adequate or was too high minded to marry for money, he 
 secretly contracted an alliance with another. " A short 
 time after I was married," he says, " I fell into a criminal 
 correspondence with a girl who soon after proved with 
 child to me, in consequence of which she was deprived of 
 her place of service, and went home to her father's in the 
 parish of Liberton, about three miles from Dalkeith ; and 
 I was put away from my mother's house and was under 
 the necessity of taking private lodgings." His wife re- 
 mained with her own people. After the birth of the 
 
THE HATs^CtTNCt of JAMES M'KEAN 259 
 
 child, M'Kean awoke one morning to find that someone 
 had deposited the infant in his bed while he slept. He 
 returned the unwelcome guest to Liberton, but it was 
 again brought back to him. Finally his mother undertook 
 the care of it, M'Kean " made public satisfaction " in the 
 parish kirk of Liberton, compensated the girl's parents for 
 their charges, and settled down to domesticity with a 
 mind at ease. 
 
 The pleasures of home life must have soon begun to 
 pall, for presently we find him sallying forth with a friend, 
 James Pringle, an Edinburgh writer, " for a country walk 
 and to avoid company." They forgathered with one John 
 Bell, who was on his way to Musselburgh to enlist under 
 Major Menzies in Frazer's Highlanders, " which were then 
 raising during the time of the American War." It was 
 arranged that the friends should accompany the recruit in 
 order to participate in the reward. " He received six 
 guineas of bounty and we received half a guinea betwixt 
 us for our bringino^ him." The sergreant marked the 
 occasion by treating them to sundry bowls of punch, and 
 at a favourable stage of the entertainment " threw down 
 all the cash he had upon the table," inviting them to 
 help themselves and go along with him. " Meantime the 
 landlord coming to serve us, used a great many impreca- 
 tions, swearing that we were all of us the King's men. At 
 this I took up a candlestick and threw it at him with such 
 violence that it cut him through the cheek bone ; then all 
 the recruits and the sergeant got up at once to seize us, 
 and the table, candle, money and all were thrown to the 
 ground. In the confusion John Bell, the recruit whom we 
 had brought, gathered all the money he could from off the 
 floor and ran off and deserted, and was never more heard 
 of, though repeatedly advertised " (a). M'Kean and his 
 learned friend were less fortunate. Arrested by the 
 
 («)Iu a footnote to this passage the author frankly admits that his temper 
 was rarely in perfect control, and cites King Solomon on the unwisdom of yield- 
 ing to that infirmity. 
 
260 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 soldiers and taken to the commanding officer's quarters 
 they found that he had just gone to bed ; his servant 
 would not disturb him, and said they must be kept 
 prisoners till next day. This so enraged the man of law 
 that he, being of powerful build, knocked down several of 
 the party and rescued his companion, who in the scuffle 
 received a bayonet thrust in the thigh. Pringle, who 
 seems to have been anything but a dry-as-dust disciple of 
 Themis, was so elated at their escape that he lifted an ale 
 barrel from the door of a place of public refreshment, and 
 pushed it through the window. " The people were so much 
 alarmed that they came out of the house and ran after us 
 naked, excepting with their shirts, but they did not over- 
 take us." The pair reached Dalkeith safely, but next day 
 a military guard arrived and took them prisoner. Pringle 
 was carried off to Edinburgh, but M'Kean's mother obtained 
 his freedom from the sergeant at the expense of two 
 guineas. How the festive writer fared is not recorded. 
 
 After this escapade M'Kean settled down of new, 
 "behaving unblameably as to the world's censure." So 
 he continued, until the mysterious disappearance of his 
 child set local tongues wagging again. According to his 
 own account his mother, to remove the scandal of the 
 child's existence, " put it into an hospital at Edinburgh." 
 What became of it he is unable to state ; the child, like 
 Mr. John Bell of Musselburgh, was never heard of more. 
 The incident was the subject of unkindly comment, and 
 so sensitive was M'Kean to criticism that " in order to 
 escape the reproach " he removed with his wife to Glasgow, 
 taking with him "sufficient testimonials of his moral char- 
 acter " from the minister of his parish. These documents, if 
 genuine, afford singular evidence of the charity of that 
 complacent divine. M'Kean found employment with a 
 firm of shoemakers, until seven years later he set up in 
 business for himself He then invited his mother to come 
 and share his home in Glasgow ; this the old lady did in 
 1785, and they lived together, he says, in perfect amity 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 261 
 
 for four months. It afterwards appeared, however, that 
 the harmony of the household suffered somewhat from 
 the uncertain temper of the master, who, among other 
 regrettable outbursts, is reported to have boiled in a pot 
 his mother's favourite cat. But he was soon to lie under 
 an imputation yet more grievous. 
 
 At eight o'clock, on the evening of 25th September 
 1785, a man unknown decoyed old Mrs. M'Kean from her 
 home in the High Street; she never returned, and next 
 day her dead body was found " in the Grand Canal, about 
 half a mile beyond the Old Basin at Hamilton Hill." 
 M'Kean's account of this untoward family incident is as 
 follows. He was working in the house all that day until 
 about 8 P.M., "when, coming out of the door, I was about 
 three steps down my own stair when a person asked at me 
 in an ordinary tone of voice, ' if it was here or where Mary 
 Hogg lived?' this being my mother's maiden name. To 
 this question I made no reply, but turning about I pushed 
 up the door of her apartment and called to her, ' Mother, 
 here is a man wanting you,' or some such words as these. 
 She accordingly came to the door, for I saw her do so ; I 
 passed the man in the stair but paid no attention to him, 
 and stood for a little time to make water in the close. I 
 overheard the man speaking to my mother and her to him 
 on the stair, but recollect nothing of what he or she said, 
 nor yet do I recollect of their passing me in the close." 
 The perfunctory and inadequate character of this explana- 
 tion is most remarkable. The old mother, a stranger in 
 the city, summoned suddenly after dark by an unknow^n 
 man, and the son neither asks his business nor notes his 
 appearance, and though within earshot of their conversation, 
 fails to recall its purport ! It is also very singular that, 
 although the old woman had been thrice married, the 
 stranger should know, and enquire for her by, her maiden 
 name. M'Kean then went out, he says, upon his own 
 affairs for an hour and came home, making no comment on 
 his mother's continued absence. "I caused my wife to 
 
262 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 serve up supper to me and send out ibr a bottle of porter ; 
 all this was done by nine o'clock or a few minutes after 
 nine ; and then as our usual course was, we made ready to 
 make family worship, which was done accordingly," On 
 the conclusion of these devotional exercises Jean M'Kerran, 
 a friend of the old lady, called to see her. Learning that 
 she was abroad, Jean decided to await her return. Eleven 
 o'clock struck, and still there was no word of her ; M'Kean's 
 filial solicitude was aroused, he and the visitor went out 
 together to look for her. They tried sundry carriers' 
 quarters and taverns " where she used to frequent," but 
 without result. By midnight the son's anxiety was 
 increased ; he. Miss M'Kerran, and a friendly tobacconist 
 who lived in the close, resumed the search, which they 
 continued till the following noon. 
 
 At midday, returning from the ineffectual quest, Jean 
 heard casually in the Gallowgate that the missing woman 
 was found drowned in the Canal ; so the bereaved son went 
 to the Canal Basin, brought to his own house the body of 
 his mother, and, as he points out, " gave her a decent 
 funeral." What more could the best of sons have done ? 
 And yet so wicked is the world that, as he complains, 
 presently among the ignorant and the ill-willing a report 
 spread that he was his mother's murderer. "This rumour," 
 he says, " was principally caused by a girl who went 
 messages for the girls in the inkle factory (a) of Messrs. 
 David Dale & Co. as she was in the room with my mother 
 ivhen I unfortunately called her out." We may so far 
 agree with our author that but for the fact stated in the 
 passage I have italicised, we should have heard nothing of 
 his connection with the tragedy. No official enquiry into 
 the case appears to have been made ; but after the funeral 
 M'Kean, at the instance of some friends, caused to be 
 inserted in the Glasgow newspapers the following advertise- 
 ment, paying 4s. 3d. for each insertion : — 
 
 (a) Inkle. — A narrow linen fabric or kind of tape, formerly used for shoe- 
 ties, apron-strings, and the like. — Wright's English Dialect Dictionary. 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 263 
 
 A REWARD OF TWENTY GUINEAS. 
 
 Whereas Mary Hogg, relict of the deceased James M'Kaen, tanner 
 in Glasgow, who for some time past has been employed in selling 
 teas, was called from her house in Castle-pens Land, in the High 
 Street of Glasgow, about seven of the clock on the evening of 
 Monday the 26th of September last, to speak with a person at the 
 close-mouth ; and the said Mary Hogg having been found dead next 
 morning in the Great Canal, near Ruchhill, there is ground to 
 suspect that her death has been occasioned by some person who had 
 her at malice ; a reward is therefore offered of 20 guineas to any 
 person who can give information of the person who took her from 
 her house ; or of the person who was accessory to or concerned in 
 her death, to be paid on conviction by her son 
 
 James M'Kaen, Shoemaker in Glasgow.(a) 
 
 No such information was ever forthcoming, and M'Kean 
 regrets to state that his mother's death remained a mystery 
 
 "this is all that 1 know respecting that unfortunate 
 
 affair." 
 
 He devotes much more energy and space to dealing with 
 another calumny of which he was the victim. His niece 
 was married to one Watson, a butcher in Lanark. This 
 gentleman's affairs becoming involved, " he made an elope- 
 ment from her." The deserted spouse applied to her uncle 
 for advice ; M'Kean went to Lanark and obtained from her 
 " the rights of a land of houses and a piece of ground," m 
 security of an account of £14 for boots and shoes supplied 
 by him to her absent lord. The butcher seems to have 
 been somewhat nice in the matter of footwear ; but even so, 
 the amount of the security appears excessive. This friendly 
 move caused trouble with the other creditors, who were 
 further annoyed when they found that Mrs. Watson had 
 sent to her uncle by James Buchanan, the Lanark carrier, 
 a sack of valuables, "to prevent them being taken from 
 her." The wods were arrested in the hands of Buchanan, 
 who refused to deliver them to M'Kean; "several sharp 
 words passed," and it may be that the offence thus given 
 to the intemperate shoemaker contributed to the carrier's 
 death. The lady seems to have shared her uncle's infirmity 
 
 (a) Glasgow Journal, 6th October 1785. 
 
264 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 of temper, for so highly was she incensed by the action of 
 the creditors that she " threatened to burn their house 
 about their ears," for which she was apprehended on a 
 warrant, " but the deceased James Buchanan bailed her out 
 of prison." Subsequently she resided with her uncle, until, 
 upon his "discovering some instances of improper behaviour 
 in her," he advised her to seek a less respectable asylum. 
 
 Now it was part of Buchanan's business to convey 
 weekly from the Merchant Banking Company of Glasgow 
 to a manufacturer in Lanark certain sums of money. 
 M'Kean says nothing about this, but it is plain that he 
 became aware of the fact and began to cultivate the carrier's 
 acquaintance. The landlord of the inn at which, when in 
 Glasgow, Buchanan used to put up deponed at the trial that 
 he had seen the pannel and the carrier in company every 
 Thursday for three or four weeks previous to the murder. 
 M'Kean admits that Buchanan spent an evening at his 
 house the week before the crime : " I lighted him down- 
 stairs, and at parting asked him to give me a call next 
 week," The carrier probably owed his escape on this 
 occasion to his not then having the Bank's money upon him. 
 On the evening of the following Friday, 7th October 1796, 
 Buchanan came again by invitation to the dark house in 
 Castle-pens Land, and was received in the back room by 
 his host, who says he was writing a letter which, along with 
 a parcel, he intended sending by the carrier. As it chanced, 
 he was mending his pen with " a very big razor, indeed the 
 largest I ever saw in the blade," to which he had bound 
 with rosined thread "a piece of old file or risp at the back, 
 to keep it steady as a haft." Unluckily the visitor broached 
 the sore subject of the bankruptcy ; " a few sharp words 
 passed," and Buchanan, losing his temper, gave his host a 
 kick on the shins. M'Kean thus describes what followed : — 
 
 I started up, and lifted up the fatal weapon in my right hand with 
 which the deed was done, and struck him fairly on the throat with it. 
 I declare he received but one stroke from me ; but a dreadful stroke it 
 was, for it was given with great violence. He was sitting on a chair, and 
 
THE HANGEXC^ OF JAMES M'KEAN 265 
 
 I was standing upon his right-band side, and when I had given him the 
 stroke, in consequence of feeling it he suddenly lifted up his right hand 
 to defend himself and grasped me by the arm ; in his doing this the chair 
 he sat upon flew fairly from him to the left side, and I having the razor 
 still at his throat, followed the stroke and fell down above him, by which 
 he received the whole weight of my body and pressure and force of my 
 arm and the instrument together, as it never went from his throat till 
 I took it out after he was dead. (a) 
 
 Such is the murderer's version, which Sir Walter Scott 
 has well termed apocryphal. " Buchanan," he remarks, 
 " was a powerful man, and M'Kean slender. It appeared 
 that the latter had engaged Buchanan in writing, then 
 suddenly clapped one hand on his eyes, and struck the 
 fatal blow with the other. The throat of the deceased was 
 cut throup-h his handkerchief to the back bone of the neck, 
 against which the razor was hacked in several places."(&) 
 The deed done, the murderer seems to have lost his head. 
 He hurried into the front room where his wife and daughter 
 were sitting sewing, seized a green cloth from the table, 
 and ran back with it to wipe up the blood, bolting the door 
 behind him. His wife, suspecting something wrong, beat 
 upon the door, which the murderer, having thrust the body 
 of the carrier into a closet, opened to her. When she 
 entered with a lighted candle — the room was then in dark- 
 ness — and saw the great quantity of blood on the floor, her 
 repeated cries of "Murder! Murder!" alarmed the house. 
 M'Kean incontinently fled, taking with him his victim's 
 watch and pocket-book. Hardly was he gone than the 
 neighbours rushed in, and the hue and cry was raised. 
 
 The bells were ringing six o'clock as the murderer 
 crossed the Old Bridge ; through the Gorbals he sped, 
 never stopping till he was some three miles on his road. 
 In his haste and walking in the dark, he stumbled into the 
 river Cart, and wet and weary continued his way to Mearns, 
 where at a change-house he supped and slept. He shared 
 
 (a) Life of James ArKean, pp. 41-42. 
 (6) Lockhart's Life of Scott, 1837, i. 257. 
 
266 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 a bed with " a travellino- old man that was comino- to 
 
 O fc) 
 
 Glasgow." Had this venerable wayfarer known who was 
 his bedfellow he had passed but a restless night. Next 
 day the fugitive was up betimes, and going through Mearns 
 Muir, broke his fast at Kilmarnock. Thence he pushed on 
 to Irvine, in the hope of embarking for Ireland. He found 
 a ship in the article of sailing, " the last cargo of coals 
 being in its longboat to go out to the vessel, as she was 
 riding at anchor." The Friendshij), Captain Cowsie, was 
 bound for Dublin, and in her M'Kean, modestly veiling his 
 identity under the alias of James Hogg, obtained a pass- 
 age. That day, Saturday, 8th October, they weighed 
 anchor at four o'clock. There were four other passengers, 
 and it soon appeared that they were to have a stormy 
 voyage ; " the winds being very contrary, the sea ran 
 dreadfully high, and the captain declared that he never 
 saw the like." To sailing-ships outward bound from the 
 Clyde the influence of a south-west gale is not propitious ; 
 the Friendship spent the week-end in beating about the 
 Firth, and early on Monday morning was forced to put in 
 for shelter to Lamlash Bay, in the Isle of Arran. 
 
 This splendid natural harbour, which, I have heard, 
 could accommodate the entire British fleet, is practically 
 landlocked, the Holy Isle, which guards it on the east, 
 leaving but a narrow channel on either hand. Being- 
 brought safely to this desired haven the passengers per- 
 suaded the captain to land them in the longboat, and the 
 party made for the inn, where they ordered breakfast, (ct) 
 As there seemed no prospect of the gale abating, our traveller 
 decided to see something of the beautiful island upon the 
 shores of which fortune had cast him ; so having hired a 
 horse he rode over the hills by the old bridle-track to 
 Brodick, the bay adjoining that of Lamlash upon the north. 
 Biding round the noble estuary, which must then, for lack 
 of sundry modern improvements, have looked even more 
 
 (o) This was not the existing hotel ; the old inn, which adjoined the present 
 police station, is the hostelry referred to by M'Kean. 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 267 
 
 lovely than it does to-day, our horseman reached Brodick 
 Castle, "where," as he mentions, "the Duke of Hamilton 
 frequently visits " ; and having admired that famous 
 fbrtalice, he rested at the picturesque old inn, which, though 
 it has long lost its public character, still spreads its fair and 
 spacious front to the roadway below the Castle. "The 
 landlord of the house," he remarks, " was a fine, active old 
 man, who had excellent talents for conversation." These, 
 unfortunately, the guest was then " too dreadfully agitated 
 in mind " to appreciate. He was, however, composed enough 
 to " take a refreshment," the nature of which he does not 
 specify ; probably it was something more stimulating than 
 the beverage for which the house was noted, (a) After 
 leaving the inn he went " down by the sea-side to a piece 
 of level ground " — the present golf course — " and set off at 
 the full gallop." He had not gone far before his horse 
 stumbled and threw him, which he accepted as a proof 
 "that God Almighty was now pouring down His judgments 
 upon me, and that the very animal was armed against me 
 in order to execute His just vengeance upon me for my 
 sins." Apart from any question of " refreshment," the 
 incident, to one knowing the nature of the ground, is 
 susceptible of an explanation less awful. By four o'clock 
 he had regained his quarters at Lamlash, where after divers 
 further potations he spent the night. Next day he went 
 with a companion " a mile or two into the island to amuse 
 me, on purpose to raise my spirits " ; the expedition met 
 with no success. His supper that evening consisted chiefly 
 of brandy ; " but the force of this stimulus had no avail to 
 cheer me, for I believe I might have drank as much spirits 
 as would burn me up, without having that effect upon me." 
 Leaving the storm-stayed travellers to discuss their 
 liquor by the fire, let us now see what was doing on the 
 mainland. William Munro, Town Officer in Glasgow, 
 
 (a) " Good goat milk quarters may be had this season in the Island of Arran, 
 in a very coaimodious slated house, hard by the Castle of Brodick." — Glasgow 
 Journal, 12th March 1759. 
 
268 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 deponed at the trial that on 7th October, having learned of 
 the murder, he went with another officer to apprehend 
 M'Kean. When they reached the house their bird had 
 flown. They traced him to Irvine, where on Sunday they 
 found that a man answering to his description had sailed 
 from that port for Dublin the day before. In view of the 
 state of the weather they were advised that the ship was 
 probably lying-to in Lamlash Bay. The officers then went 
 on to Saltcoats, the nearest point for Arran, and tried to get 
 a boat to take them over to the island, " but the sea was so 
 tempestuous they [the boatmen] would not venture out." 
 Next morning, Tuesday, the weather was still very boister- 
 ous and no boat could be had, but the officers, determined 
 to cross at all risks, " got an order from a Justice of the 
 Peace and impressed a boat." With much danger and 
 difficulty they reached Lamlash about 8 p.m. There, sure 
 enough, lay the Friendship at anchor in the bay, under 
 the lee of the Holy Isle, but the sea was running too high 
 to permit of them boarding her, so they landed and made 
 for the inn, " where they called for a room and a fire as 
 they were very wet." On the officers being shown into 
 the kitchen they saw, among the party sitting round the 
 fire, the wanted man, whom they knew by sight. Munro 
 whipped out a pistol and bade him surrender, which, per- 
 ceiving that the game was up, he did. He was taken into 
 a private room and searched, when the carrier's watch and 
 pocket-book — the latter " sewed into his greatcoat " — were 
 found upon him. At 8 A.M. next day, the weather having 
 moderated, the officers took their prisoner back in their 
 boat to Irvine, whence they conveyed him in a postchaise 
 to Glasgow, and by 6 p.m. he was safely lodged in the 
 Tolbooth. John Graham, Munro's fellow-officer in the 
 expedition, " concurred in everything with the preceding 
 witness." There M'Kean remained, undergoing, as he 
 avers, certain spiritual experiences which he describes with 
 unctuous particularity, until removed to Edinburgh for 
 his trial. 
 

THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 269 
 
 The proceedings began in the High Court of Justiciary 
 on Monday, 12th December 1796 (a). The Right Honour- 
 able Kobert M'Queen of Braxfield, Lord Justice-Clerk, was 
 on the Bench ; Robert Dundas of Arniston, His Majesty's 
 Advocate, appeared for the Crown ; the pannel, as we shall 
 see, was not represented by counsel. The indictment 
 charged him with the crimes of murder and robbery : 
 
 In so far as the late deceased James Buchanan, carrier between 
 Lanark and Glasgow, having waited on you on the evening of the 7th 
 of October last in this present year 1796, in the house then possessed by 
 you in the High Street of Glasgow aforesaid, in consequence of a previous 
 invitation by you, you conducted him into a back room in your house, 
 when you the said James M'Kean immediately thereafter upon the said 
 evening . . . did wickedly and inhumanly murder the said James 
 Buchanan by cutting his throat with a razor from ear to ear which 
 occasioned his immediate death, and after giving this mortal wound you 
 the said James M'Kean did, time and place foresaid, wickedly and feloni- 
 ously rob the said James Buchanan by taking out of his pockets his silver 
 watch and black leather pocket-book, containing £118 Sterling or thereby 
 in Bank Notes and promissory Notes of Banking Companies, besides 
 sundry Bills and Receipts ... all which you the said James M'Kean 
 carried off and immediately fled, and being then pursued, you were traced 
 to Lamlash in the Island of Arran, where you were apprehended and 
 brought back to Glasgow. 
 
 A declaration emitted by him on 1 2th October, in which 
 he denied his guilt, as also the watch, pocket-book and 
 money, were libelled as productions. The indictment 
 having been read the pannel pleaded guilty to both 
 charges, handing in a written and signed acknowledgment 
 of his guilt. " Have you any counsel ? " asked the Justice- 
 Clerk ; " No," replied the prisoner, " nor do I desire any 
 but the Almighty." The usual interlocutor finding the 
 libel relevant having been pronounced and a jury em- 
 pannelled, the Lord Advocate said that although from the 
 judicial confession by the pannel there was full evidence 
 of his guilt, yet in order to satisfy the Court and the 
 country in general of the enormity of the crime his Lordship 
 
 (a) This iiccount of the proceedings is derived from the report in the Cale- 
 donian Mercury of 15tli December 1796. 
 
270 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 would adduce such proof as would, independent of the 
 prisoner s admission, clearly establish the fact and furnish 
 a sufficient warrant for the jury to return a verdict of 
 guilty. 
 
 Several of the neighbours who lived in the tenement 
 were then examined. They all told the same tale. Shortly 
 before six o'clock M'Kean came home to tea ; in a few 
 minutes were heard cries of " Murder ! " and the noise of 
 someone rushing down the common stair ; entering the 
 house they found Mrs. M'Kean "in an ecstasy of grief, 
 crying she was ruined and undone ; her man had murdered 
 James Buchanan, and fled ; the body was in the back room 
 closet." They saw the blood upon the floor, also the fatal 
 weapon ; and, in the closet, the dead body of the carrier. 
 
 William Nimmo, surgeon in Glasgow, stated that he 
 was summoned to M'Kean's house on the night in question 
 and saw the body of Buchanan, whom he knew. " He 
 discovered a great wound in the throat. The carotid 
 arteries were cut on both sides extending almost to the 
 backbone, which, he had no doubt, occasioned instant 
 death. There was no other wound on the body." 
 
 Hugh Allan, change-keeper in Glasgow, deponed that 
 Buchanan w^as in use to put up at his house. Buchanan 
 told him that M'Kean had invited him [the carrier] to 
 drink tea at his house on Friday, 7 th October. In the 
 course of that day Allan delivered a parcel of money to 
 Buchanan, who put it up in his black leather pocket-book. 
 He last saw him alive at twenty minutes to five o'clock that 
 evening. He had seen the pannel in company with Buchanan 
 weekly for a month before the murder. The prisoner, 
 being asked whether he had any questions to put, said that 
 the witness had not told the truth, " but he forgave him."' 
 
 Ofticers Munro and Graham gave evidence as to the 
 pursuit and capture of the prisoner, and divers witnesses 
 proved that the watch, pocket-book and money found upon 
 him had been in the possession of Buchanan on the day of 
 the carrier's death. This closed the Crown case, and the 
 
THE HANGING OF JAIMES M'KEAN 271 
 
 Lord Advocate stated that he would not trouble the Court 
 or jury with any observations, as the case was so clear that 
 it required no comment. The jury were then enclosed, and 
 appointed to return their verdict next day at one o'clock. 
 
 On Tuesday, 13th December, when the Court met, the 
 pannel was found guilty as libelled ; whereupon Lord 
 Braxfield " delivered his sentiments " in few words, but 
 in such forcible language as to affect in a very powerful 
 decree the feelinj^s of the audience. " On the mind of the 
 prisoner," we read, " they were calculated to make a very 
 strong impression indeed." His Lordship observed that 
 the enormity of the crime, the calm deliberation with which 
 the pannel followed out his purpose and the circumstances 
 attendant upon this foul murder, indicated a mind sunk to 
 the last degree of depravity, and the ghastly deed which 
 he had perpetrated threw a stain upon the human char- 
 acter and reproach upon our country. In pronouncing 
 sentence his Lordship, addressing the pannel " in a suitable 
 and affecting manner," pointed out that the crime he had 
 committed was such as to preclude him from all hope of 
 mercy in this world, and therefore earnestly entreated him 
 to make his peace with God, whose mercy would, if he 
 were truly penitent, be extended to him, great as his crimes 
 had been. 
 
 It will be remarked that we have here no sign of the 
 coarse and brutal exultation over convicted prisoners which 
 Henry Cockburn would have us believe to have been upon 
 such occasions the habitual manner of Lord Braxfield. 
 
 The Justice-Clerk then pronounced sentence as follows : 
 — That the pannel should be taken from the bar to the 
 Tolbooth of Edinburgh, there to be fed on bread and water 
 till Monday, 26th December, on which day he should be 
 delivered to the Sheriff of Edinburgh and be transmitted 
 from Sheriff to Sheriff till he be lodged in the jail of 
 Glasgow, there to remain until Wednesday, the 25tb day 
 of January, on which day, between the hours of two and 
 four o'clock, he should be hanged at the common place of 
 
272 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 execution and his body delivered to Dr. James Jeffrey, 
 Professor of* Anatomy in the University of Glasgow, to be 
 by him publicly dissected and anatomised. The Court 
 then rose. 
 
 " During the whole course of the trial," concludes our 
 reporter, " and at pronouncing sentence, the unhappy 
 prisoner conducted himself with becoming resignation. 
 He is a decent-looking man about 44 years of age, 5 feet 
 6 or 7 inches high, was dressed in a brown coat, black silk 
 waistcoat and breeches, over which he wore a striped green 
 greatcoat. The Court was uncommonly crowded both days, 
 and an astonishing crowd attended to see the prisoner go 
 into the Parliament House." (a) 
 
 Among the familiar Edinburgh figures that filled to 
 overflowing the narrow limits of the old Justiciary Court- 
 room was a young advocate of no great distinction at the bar, 
 to which he had been some four years called. But lately 
 crossed in love, he had just published his first literary 
 venture, a little book of ballads after Biirger. This incon- 
 siderable junior was Walter Scott, who, as his son-in-law 
 afterwards recorded, had the curiosity to witness the trial. 
 All his life, indeed, as we know on the same authority, Sir 
 Walter had a passion for reading murder cases, and attended 
 such celebrated trials as were held in Edinburgh in his 
 time. " I have heard Scott," writes Lockhart of the pre- 
 sent case, " describe the sanctimonious air which the 
 murderer maintained during his trial — preserving through- 
 out the aspect of a devout person, who believed himself to 
 have been hurried into his accumulation of crime by an 
 uncontrollable exertion of diabolical influence." {b) The 
 library at Abbotsford contained, among a large collection 
 of criminal trials, a copy of The Life of James M'Kaen, 
 doubtless bought by Sir Walter on its publication, upon 
 which he had written the following interesting marginal 
 note : — 
 
 (ft) Cahdnnian Mercury, 15th December 1796. (/') Lockliart, i. 256. 
 
THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 273 
 
 I went to see this wretched man when under sentence of death, along 
 with my friend Mr. William Clerk, advocate. His great anxiety was to 
 convince us that his diabolical murder was committed from a sudden 
 impulse of revengeful and violent passion, not from deliberate design of 
 plunder. But the contrary was manifest from the accurate preparation 
 of the deadly instrument, a razor strongly lashed to an iron bolt, and 
 also from the evidence on the trial, from which it seems he had invited 
 his victim to drink tea with him on the day he perpetrated the murder, 
 and that this was a reiterated invitation. M'Kean was a good-looking, 
 elderly man, having a thin face and clear grey eye ; such a man as may 
 be ordinarily seen beside a collection-plate at a seceding meeting-house, 
 a post which the said M'Kean had occupied in his day. All M'Kean's 
 account of the murder is apocryphal, (a). 
 
 The remainder of the note I have already quoted. Scott 
 and his friend Clerk were not the only people whom M'Kean 
 sought to persuade that he was less black than the facts 
 painted him. Not content with appending to his auto- 
 biography a lay sermon on sin, in which lie particularly 
 warned his readers to beware of pride and passion, he 
 furnished as a sort of moral bonus a selection of Bible 
 texts bearing on bloodguiltiness, "which," he thoughtfully 
 remarks, " will save the reader the trouble of collecting 
 them himself, as the verses lye scattered in various parts 
 of the Sacred Volume." Four days before his execution 
 he wrote a farewell letter to his wife and children. The 
 Last Letter of James M'Kaen was printed as an eight- 
 page penny pamphlet by Brash and lleid, the publishers 
 of the Life, (h) and was advertised as containing " striking 
 particulars respecting his dreadful situation immediately 
 after he committed the horrid deed, which he omitted to 
 state in his Narrative." On perusal, it appears to have 
 been framed more with the view of catching the public 
 pence than of affording comfort to his afflicted family. As 
 a contribution to our knowledge of the case these reflections 
 of " a hell-deserving creature " — the phrase is the author's 
 — are disappointing, and except from the collector's point 
 of view the tract is but a poor pennyworth. 
 
 (a) Lockhart, i. 257. 
 
 (6) James Brash and William Eeid, publishers of the "Penny Poets," carried 
 on business in the Trongate from 1790 for nearly thirty years. 
 
274 THE HANGING OF JAMES M'KEAN 
 
 On Wednesday, 25th January 1797, the murderer, in 
 pursuance of his sentence, ceased to burden the earth. 
 
 Yesterday James M'Kean was executed at the Cross of Glasgow on a 
 new erected gibbet, for the murder and robbery of James Buchanan, the 
 Lanark carrier. He appeared on the scaffold dressed in white, about ten 
 minutes after three, proceeded to the front with a firm and undaunted 
 air, holding a paper in his hand, and after saying a few words to the 
 multitude, which was immense (about 20,000), he gave it to one of the 
 Town Officers. About ten minutes thereafter he mounted the platform 
 with much indifference, and after praying for a few minutes was launched 
 into eternity, without one sympathising tear from the surrounding 
 multitude.(a) 
 
 Scarcely was he cut down than his indefatigable 
 publishers announced " A Particular Account of M'Kaen's 
 Execution and Final Address on the Scaffold, price One 
 Penny." No copy of this bibliographical rarity has 
 rewarded my research ; it is unlikely, however, that we 
 have lost much. What with the Life, "price Ninepence," 
 running to three editions, the Last Letter, and the 
 Particular Account, Messrs. Brash and Reid seem to have 
 made the most of their ugly customer, and might well have 
 spared on the occasion of his last appearance one of those 
 tributes of regret which the Mei^cury reporter missed. 
 
 If Mr. Archibald Weir, that supersensitive youth, when 
 he strayed one day into the Justiciary Court, had chanced 
 upon the trial of James M'Kean instead of that of Duncan 
 Jopp, it is just possible that his tortured spirit might have 
 found the business less "hideous." The hanging of the 
 carrier's murderer need not have had so disquieting an 
 effect upon his gorge, and in the subsequent debate at the 
 Spec, his views on the subject of capital punishment would 
 perhaps have been more happily expressed. But then we 
 should lack Weir of Hermiston ; and although we have 
 plenty of plain truth, where could we find fiction thus 
 superbly coloured ? 
 
 (a) Caledonian Mercury, 26th January 1797. 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAX FIELD 
 
 We honour your old Virtues, conformable unto times V)efore you, 
 which are the noblest Armoury. And, having long exyierience of your 
 friendly Conversation, void of empty Formality, full of Freedome, con- 
 stant and generous Honesty, 1 look upon you as a Gemme of the old Rock. 
 
 — Sir Thomas Browne. 
 
 A PHILOSOPHER of the carpe diem school has acutely 
 ^^-^ remarked that we are a long time dead. But it by 
 no means follows that we are long remembered, and indeed 
 the facility with which the world can forget the dead is 
 only surpassed by its reluctance to forgive the living. The 
 vainest of us, having cast into the stream of Time our more 
 or less considerable pebble, must realise the transitory 
 nature of the consequent disturbance, and we may w^ell 
 marvel at the force of a personality so potent as to compass, 
 amid the welter of the generations, the distinction of a 
 bi-centenary. Of the several ways by which such eminence 
 may be attained there is one that surely leads to post- 
 humous renown, a road, however, for obvious reasons none 
 but the boldest dare to travel. A high reputation for 
 wickedness is an unfailing passport to immortality. While 
 the dust gathers deep upon many a fair and gracious 
 memory, you, if only you be bad enough, may count on 
 being remembered. This, you observe, means more than 
 merely not to be forgotten, which is but a cold and 
 negative reward, very different from the lively coronal 
 of remembrance. Whether you proudly reign with 
 Ahab and Caligula, or take humbler rank with Blue- 
 beard and the Tichborne Claimant, the benefit of infamy 
 is assured. 
 
 Something of this invidious fame has been conferred by 
 Lord Cockburn upon Lord Braxfield. Cockburn was in no 
 
 277 
 
278 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 sense of the term a great judge, but he was a good man and 
 a writer of much charm, so he justly enjoys wide popularity 
 and his opinions are generally received. These two Senators 
 of the College of Justice had, beyond the judicial office 
 which they so variously filled, nothing in common. No 
 temperaments could be more disparate. Braxfield, a rough 
 diamond, inelegant of manner, broad, convivial, strong in 
 mind as in body, humorous after the fashion of Ben Jonson, 
 passionately patriotic, an inveterate Tory, and above all a 
 great lawyer, was the full-blooded son of the Eighteenth 
 Century. Cockburn, well bred, urbane, fastidious, physic- 
 ally shght, a resolute Whig of the Reform brand, and both 
 intellectually and professionally less distinguished than the 
 other, was a child of the new era. Had they met as men — 
 for Cockburn was a boy when Braxfield died— my Lord 
 might conceivably have called his learned colleague a 
 "daam'd auld wife" ; Cockburn's retort, if more genteelly 
 phrased, would have been none the less unflattering. But 
 they never did so meet, for Cockburn was not admitted to 
 the Bar till the Justice-Clerk was in his grave, and the 
 forbidding portrait of "the Jefl'reys of Scotland" in the 
 Memorkds is painted by a partisan brush with other 
 people's colours. Hearsay, and political at that, is, as a 
 Lord of Session ought to know, not the best of evidence. (a) 
 Happily there is direct testimony on the other side. In 
 this age of compromise and coalition we can hardly conceive 
 the inflammatory eflect upon our forebears of divergent 
 political views. The Scot of those days regarded differences 
 in politics and doctrine as equally vital, and imported into 
 the one a bitterness more properly reserved for the other. 
 Cockburn, in writing his ex j^arte account of the sedition 
 trials, says that he recognised " the duty of never letting 
 Braxfield and the years 1793 and 1794 be forgotten," and 
 that he only refrained from publishing it in his lifetime 
 out of consideration for the feelings of the other judges' 
 
 («) Examination of Trials for Sedition in Scotland, Edinburgh, 1888, i. 87. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LOKD BRAXFIELD 279 
 
 relatives. (a) His endeavour thus to perpetuate the memory 
 of "this coarse and dexterous ruffian," a singular labour of 
 love, might have failed of its purpose. Fortunately for 
 Lord Braxtield's fame there was exhibited at Edinburgh one 
 autumn in the 'seventies a collection of paintings by Sir 
 Henry Raeburn, into which a certain young advocate with 
 nothing better to do found his way. The half-length of 
 Robert M'Queen of Braxfield irresistibly attracted him ; 
 the result was the delightful sketch in Some Portraits by 
 Raeburn, and the living picture in Weir of Hermiston. 
 So, for numbers who cared neither for Cockburn nor his 
 works, was the Justice-Clerk made a homely and familiar 
 figure, and his name imperishably embalmed in literature. 
 
 I don't suppose Lord Braxfield ever gave a thought to 
 the verdict of posterity. He enjoyed life as he had it, 
 heartily and wholly ; he did his duty as he saw it, staunchly 
 and unflinchingly, in the face of much public opprobrium. 
 Like him or not as you will, you are bound to yield to him 
 the tribute of your respect, for if not beyond reproach he 
 was indisputably without fear. There are few finer things 
 told of him than that in the letter of his friend John Mow- 
 bray of Hartwood, W.S., which I have elsewhere printed. (6) 
 All day long Mowbray had sat in the thronged Justiciary 
 Court, listening to the sedition trial, before Lord Braxfield, 
 of Citizen Margarot, the Friend of the People. The case 
 lasted till four o'clock of a black winter morning ; that 
 truculent demagogue had been sent to Botany Bay, amid 
 furious threats of personal violence against the judge vented 
 by an excited mob in the gallery, and Mowbray anticipated 
 trouble. When the Court rose the Justice-Clerk put on 
 his greatcoat and trudged away home to George Square, 
 " down Libberton's Wynd and up Hume's Close, two very 
 dark and dangerous passages." Apprehensive for the old 
 man's safety, Mowbray followed. At the head of Hume's 
 
 (a) Examination of Trials for Sedition in Scotland, Prefatory Note. 
 
 (b) "The Real Braxfield," Juridical Review, May 1914; reprinted in The 
 Riddle of the Ruthvens and Other Studies, 1919, pp. 39-65. 
 
280 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 Close Braxfield became aware of him, and turning round 
 said, " Is this you, Mr. Mowbray ? What brings you here 
 at this time ? This is not the road to your house." 
 Whereupon Mowbray explained that he could not be at 
 ease until he had seen his Lordship safe to his own door. 
 But Braxfield would have none of his convoy. He thanked 
 him ; there was no danger, he was only doing his duty, 
 which, he added with a characteristic chuckle, he couldn't 
 have done had he paid any regard to the mass of threaten- 
 ing letters he received daily ; " but they gaed a' the same 
 gate." And so the stout old judge strode off alone. 
 Memories of Captain Porteous and of how an Edinburgli 
 mob could deal with unpopular officials did not disturb 
 him. Let us, despite his Lordship's inhibition, follow 
 him home. 
 
 I often think it is a pity that in a place of such historic 
 interest as Edinburgh the houses do not bear upon the 
 fronts some record of their more famous occupants. In a 
 city relatively so small many a house has held from time 
 to time divers distinguished tenants, whom one lacks patience 
 to search for in the columns of old directories. Indeed, 
 even these guides are not infallible. The first Edinburgh 
 Directory of 1773-74 gives Braxfield's address as George 
 Square, tout court, and so do all later issues, till his death 
 in 1799. How No. 28 acquired the honour of being known 
 as his house does not appear, but the legend was crystallised 
 by Harrison in his Memorable Edinburgh Houses, where 
 he categorically states the " fact," and other writers have 
 followed suit. That B. L. S. himself was a victim of this 
 vulgar error is manifest from his references to the position 
 of Lord Hermiston's house in the Square. Often must 
 devout Stevensonians, pausing before No. 28, have imaged 
 the stalwart figure mounting those steps, or beheld, in a 
 fervour of enthusiasm, the gurly face glowering with its 
 " small quick eye " from out that dining-room window. 
 I, myself, fresh from reperusal of the magic tale, have 
 seen these things ; and, alas ! unless Lord Braxfield visited 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BEAXFIELD 281 
 
 at that house he had no more to do with it than you or I 
 — a fine commentary on the value of tradition and the 
 veneratins: of landmarks. Lawyers and others throuo^h 
 whose hands the title-deeds of the real and of the reputed 
 residences chanced to pass must, of course, have been con- 
 versant with the truth ; but nobody took the trouble to 
 proclaim it, and not until Mr. Forbes Gray examined the 
 writs of the property, and communicated his discovery to 
 the press in an interesting article, (a) was the matter made 
 common knowledge and the fact established once for all. 
 Thus No. 13, so long kept out of its rights, received due 
 recognition, and No. 28, deprived of its spurious fame, sank 
 into deserved obscurity. 
 
 When in the last quarter of the eighteenth century 
 Edinburgh began, in Robert Fergusson's phrase, to " spread 
 around : her bonny wings on fairy ground," her earliest 
 flights were towards the Meadows. Brown Square, at the 
 west end of the present Chambers Street, was her first 
 venture beyond the Cowgate valley ; the formation of 
 George Square, a more notable improvement, was the next 
 advance. Theretofore people had lived piled up one above 
 another in the flatted tenements of the Old Town, and 
 well-to-do citizens were quick to see the convenience of 
 having a " self-contained " house. Curiously enough, as 
 an instance of Time's revenges, the greater mansions of 
 Edinburgh are nowadays being "reconditioned" into separate 
 flats. Amono- the first emip'rants from the real Auld 
 Reikie to the southern fields, flitting from the historic 
 but insalubrious purlieus of Covenant Close, was Mr. Robert 
 M'Queen of Hardington, advocate (who had not yet suc- 
 ceeded to the paternal acres), then the leading counsel of 
 his day, and in receipt, as Ramsay of Ochtertyre has 
 recorded, of prodigious fees. (?>) In 1770 he acquired from 
 James Brown, architect in Edinburgh, for £1500, a piece 
 
 (a) Scotsman, 2nd April 1921. 
 
 (6) ScotlcMcl and Scotsmen, i. 380-393. This reference embraces my further 
 citations from Ramsay. 
 
282 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 of ground on which he built No. 13, "the third house 
 from the west in the north row of the great Square, building 
 by the said James Brown," Here, then, lived my Lord 
 for the remaining twenty-nine years of his life ; here he 
 laboured at his law papers, and entertained his friends 
 upon many a glad occasion ; here his two consorts succes- 
 sively reigned — more happily, let us hope, than Mrs. Weir 
 — and his children grew up to be well seen in the world ; 
 here his last days were dragged out beneath the fell shadow 
 of disease, and after long, painful passage of the dark 
 vale his strong soul found rest. The house, materially 
 unchanged, continued down to our own time in private 
 occupation, until in 1904 it was transformed into a College 
 of Agriculture. As the required structural alterations were 
 mainly at the back, the principal rooms look much as they 
 must have done in Braxfield's day. My Lord, who, as 
 Ramsay relates, was an enthusiastic farmer of his own 
 lands in Lanarkshire, would have acknowledged the fitness 
 of the appropriation, and the spirit of the old judge may 
 be supposed all genially to preside over the studies of the 
 incipient husbandmen. 
 
 Kobert M'Queen coming, a landward lad, to the then 
 close corporation of the Parliament House, had none of the 
 hereditary advantages enjoyed by the aristocracy of the 
 robe. His grandfather was a gardener, his father a country 
 writer, and he himself got his education at Lanark grammar 
 school. John M'Queen, from being baron -bailie to Lord 
 Selkirk — a post similar to that held by Bailie Macwheeble 
 in Waverley — rose to be Sheriff- Substitute for the Upper 
 Ward of Lanarkshire, married the daughter of a county 
 laird, and bought the lands of Braxfield, a small but 
 picturesque property upon the banks of Clyde, within a 
 mile of Lanark. There on 4th May 1722 his eldest son 
 Robert, first of a brood of seven, w^as born. The boy was 
 destined for the father's office ; by-and-by he was sent to 
 Edinburgh and apprenticed to Thomas Goldie, W.S., under 
 whose care, according to his first biographer, the future 
 
LuAXriKLD llul'bK, LANAllKSJllia;. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 283 
 
 Justice-Clerk thus early " began to perceive and to appreci- 
 ate the beauty and systematic order and arrangement of 
 the feudal law, a branch of professional knowledge in which 
 he was far superior to any lawyer of his time."(a) These 
 recondite joys, Ramsay tells us, were varied, on holidays 
 at Braxfield, by bird-nesting in the paternal trees. It 
 happened that Robert Dundas of Arniston, son of the first 
 Lord President Dundas, having married the heiress of 
 Bonnington, an estate about a mile from Braxfield, got to 
 know the lad, and became enamoured of his company and 
 conversation. From these he augured that Robert was too 
 promising a boy to be made a mere country lawyer, and 
 urged his father to send him to the Bar. " The advice of 
 such a man," says Ramsay, " w^as equal to a command " ; 
 and after the usual course of study at Edinburgh College, 
 Robert, in his twenty-second year, was on 14th February 
 1744 admitted a member of the Faculty.(6) 
 
 Many fledgling advocates, for lack of brains or backing 
 or of both, are doomed to attenuate their souls (in more 
 senses than one) by long unproductive pacing of our national 
 Salle de Pas-Perdus. Not so the young man from Lanark. 
 He had the capacity, and the chance of showing it was not 
 delayed. We are not here concerned with the momentous 
 happenings of the Forty-five except as they affected his 
 fortunes. The forfeitures of the estates belonging to the 
 Jacobite lairds who had taken part in the Rising pro- 
 duced a heavy crop of litigation in the Court of Session. 
 M'Queen's abilities led to his employment in these law- 
 suits, and he was retained as counsel on the part of the 
 Crown. Here he found a field for the full display of his 
 knowledge and skill as a feudist. His appearances engaged 
 general attention ; he deservedly attracted the notice of prac- 
 titioners, and soon came into high estimation as a sound 
 lawyer. Agents liked his easy unaffected manners, his 
 
 (a) Biographical Sketch of the late Rt. Hon. Robert M'Queeu of Braxfield, 
 Lord Justice-Clerk, Scot^ Magazine, May-June 1801, Ixiii. 303-304. 
 (6) Faculty Records. 
 
284 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 luminous and convincing mode of stating his opinions, and 
 his happy and energetic method of pleading his causes. (a) 
 The fact that Dundas, his friend and patron, was now 
 Solicitor-General for Scotland would no doubt contribute 
 to the young counsel's rapid rise. In the same year he w^as 
 installed as Sheriff- Substitute at Lanark to assist his father 
 in that office, which he continued to do until his increasing- 
 practice required his whole time and attention. (5) 
 
 In the thirtieth chapter of La Dame de Monsoreau, 
 that intriguing romance, the great Dumas justifies by the 
 custom of the time his introduction of so many of his 
 characters into so many hostelries. Eighteenth-century 
 Edinburgh resembled in that respect the Paris of the 
 Valois. The important part then played by taverns in the 
 daily life of the citizens can now- hardly be conceived. Not 
 only were they, the taverns, as the old-time equivalent of 
 the modern club and refreshment bar, places of social 
 pleasure and recreation, but in them was conducted all 
 sorts of solemn business. There the merchant made his 
 bargains, the physician met his patients, the lawyer 
 interviewed his clients. As Sir Alexander Boswell has 
 pleasantly sung : — 
 
 O'er draughts of wine the Writer pen'd the will ; 
 And Legal Wisdom counsel'd o'er a gill.(c) 
 
 Indeed so identified was the tavern with the law that it 
 had become the very vestibule of the Temple of Themis. 
 " The usual manner of preparing counsel was to convene in 
 a tavern, where they were met by the agent who conducted 
 the cause. At these consultations Mr. M'Queen peculiarly 
 shone ; abstract and difficult points seemed to vanish before 
 him, and the openness and candour with which he gave his 
 opinion were highly to his honour. "(c?) In addition to his 
 other qualifications the future Justice-Clerk had as good a 
 
 (a) Biographical Sketch, pp. 304-305. 
 
 (b) MS. History of the House of Braxfield, by Thomas Raid. 
 
 (c) Edinburgh, or The Ancient Royalty, 1810, p. 24. 
 
 (d) Biographical Sketch, p. 305. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAEY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 285 
 
 head for liquor as for law and was equal to any amount of 
 either, which gave him a great advantage over his weaker 
 brethren. It is interesting to know that as a matter of 
 etiquette the choice of the beverage consumed at consulta- 
 tions was left to counsel, who usually condescended upon 
 sherry in a mutchkin stoup (a) as "mellering to the organ." 
 Ramsay, M'Queen's contemporary at the Bar, has 
 preserved his impressions of the popular pleader. His 
 judgment as a Whig gentleman of the old school, free 
 from the rancorous spirit which later informed Scots 
 politics, is of special value. Among the many eminent 
 lawyers of the day, he says, M'Queen's merits were con- 
 spicuous. His frankness and honesty commended him to 
 agents who preferred substance to show. With the judges 
 he was equally a favourite. " It was obvious to every- 
 body that his papers and pleadings made a deep im- 
 pression on the Court, from his keeping close to the 
 matter at issue, without any rhetorical flourishes or 
 digressions." In the fields of feudal and civil law he 
 was easily first. Another authority tells us that M'Queen 
 "liked pleadings before the Lord Ordinary better than 
 Inner House memorials," which, being interpreted, means 
 that he preferred oral argument before the judge of first 
 instance to the written pleadings whereby cases were then 
 presented to the whole Court — the old Fifteen. " Of 
 these pleadings he had a very large share ; he is known 
 to have repeatedly pled from 15 to 20 causes in one day." 
 The labour involved in mastering the legal points as well 
 as the relative facts and circumstances of so many con- 
 current cases demands mental and physical powers of 
 singular strength. Busy counsel before and since, having 
 accepted more work than they could conveniently attend 
 to, have been accused of sacrificing their less lucrative 
 cases. Not so M'Queen, who " never declined doing his 
 duty in any cause ; he was remarkably diligent and active. 
 
 (o) Somerville's Own Life and Times, p. 373. 
 
286 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 The numerous papers which he wrote are proofs of this. 
 His style of writing was extremely clear, distinct, and 
 energetic, although neither his language nor his pro- 
 nunciation were much polished." (a) As an oral pleader 
 Ramsay thought that he undervalued rhetoric too much, 
 trusting chiefly to the strength of his intellect and his 
 skill in supporting unadorned facts by principles. This 
 was the reason why he so seldom figured in the Courts of 
 Exchequer and Justiciary, where a more ornate style of 
 oratory obtained. He lacked the silver tongue, the 
 plausible and flowing eloquence of the popular advocate. 
 Throughout his long loquacious life M'Queen sturdily 
 adhered to the natural and kindly Scots which as a boy 
 he had learnt at his Lanark school in the Broomgate, and 
 both as counsel and judge he scouted the nipperty-tipperty 
 English aflected by the followers of fashion. But this 
 foible of his had little influence on his success, for it is 
 said that few important and remarkable cases occurred 
 during his thirty-two years' practice in which on one side 
 or the other he was not employed. A consideration of 
 these would take us too far, but mention must be made 
 of the great Douglas Cause, that Brobdingnagian lawsuit, 
 which absorbed for eight years the energies of all the big 
 wigs of the Bar. M'Queen was of counsel for the claimant, 
 and his hand may be traced in the admirable memorial 
 prepared on behalf of his young client. The oral pleadings 
 in the Court of Session occupied the then unprecedented 
 space of twenty-one days ; seven counsel addressed the 
 Court for the pursuers, the Duke of Hamilton and others, 
 and seven for the defender, Archibald Douglas of Douglas, 
 McQueen's speech being delivered on Friday, 18th July 
 1766.(6) As everyone knows, the Scots judges were 
 equally divided and Mr. Douglas lost his case by the 
 casting vote of Lord President Dundas, to the high in- 
 dignation of the populace, who indicated their dissent 
 
 (a) Biogiapliical Sketch, p. 305. 
 
 (b) The Douglas Cause, A. Francis Steuart, 1909, p. 19. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 287 
 
 from the judgment by smashing his Lordship's windows. 
 On appeal to the House of Lords, however, the decision 
 was reversed, and Mr. Douglas was found to be his mother's 
 son and the heir of his uncle, the Duke of Douglas. 
 
 When Dundas became Lord Advocate in 1754 he 
 appointed M'Queen one of his deputes, an office which 
 the latter filled with his wonted efficiency and zeal. In 
 1760 Dundas succeeded his father as Lord President. 
 Both he and his brother Henry (a) were old friends of 
 M'Queen, and having the highest opinion of his abilities, 
 were long desirous of seeing him on the Bench. "Mr. 
 M'Queen for some time resisted their importunities. Being 
 in the receipt of much more money as a barrister, he 
 conceived that duty to his family required perseverance 
 in that situation." The salary of a Scottish judge was 
 then but £640 ; the appointment would present few- 
 attractions to the best-paid counsel at the Bar. In 1776, 
 however, a vacancy occurred on the death of Lord Coalston, 
 and M'Queen was at last prevailed upon reluctantly to 
 accept a judgeship, yielding to the solicitations of the 
 Dundas brethren — Henry Dundas was then Lord Advocate 
 — " aided and seconded by the Earl of Suffolk, Secretary 
 of State." So sensible was Lord Mansfield of this acquisi- 
 tion to the Scots judiciary and of M'Queen's disinterested 
 action in the matter, that he spoke of it in the highest 
 terms of approbation. (^) On 13th December 1776 the 
 new judge took his seat with the judicial title of Lord 
 Braxfield, after that of his Lanarkshire estate.{c) The 
 old judges used always to be known by their territorial 
 designations, a custom nowadays for divers cogent reasons 
 pretermitted. One regrets the change ; Lord Smith or 
 Lord Brown may be as learned lawyers, but their titles 
 are surely less euphonious than those, say, of Lords AUer- 
 
 (rt) Henry Dundas, afterwards Lord Melville, was Solicitor-General for Scot- 
 land in 1766 and Lord Advocate in 1775. 
 (6) Biogvaplucal Sketch, p. 306. 
 (c) Books of Sederunt. 
 
288 THE BI-CENTENAEY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 muir and Caerketton. Lord Hermiston, you remember, 
 took his title from his wife's lands. (a) 
 
 Though M'Queen had sacrificed so much in leaving the 
 Bar no further advancement came his way until on the 
 resignation of Lord Auchinleck, father of the great little 
 Boswell, he was made on 1st March 1780 a Lord Commis- 
 sioner of Justiciary, (?>) an office which, together with that 
 of ordinary Lord of Session, he held for several years. 
 Lord President Dundas died In 1787 ; his place was taken 
 by Lord Glenlee, the Sheriff Miller of Catriona, who thus 
 became head of the Court, and was on 15th January 1788 
 succeeded by Braxfield as Lord Justice-Clerk of Scotland.(c) 
 This was the highest round of the professional ladder which 
 he was destined to reach. 
 
 The achievement of M'Queen has been insufficiently 
 appreciated. In these democratic days anyone may go to 
 the Bar, and if he have the requisite brains and luck there 
 is no honour to which he may not aspire. It was far 
 otherwise in the bad old times. The Parliament House 
 was then a highly exclusive club, into which the entrance 
 of a member lacking the indispensable qualifications of birth 
 and breeding called for unique self-confidence and courage. 
 Yet this gardener's grandson, with his rough manners and 
 landward speech, won not only his professional spurs, but 
 the friendship and esteem of his brethren and of the judges, 
 and rose by distinguished stages to be president of the 
 criminal Court. How great must have been the qualities 
 of head and heart which, despite so heavy a handicap, 
 enabled their possessor to win the race. Well might young 
 Walter Scott, in the dedication of his thesis on admission 
 to the Faculty, thus address his Lordship : — 
 
 Viro nobili Roberto Macqueen de Braxfield, inter qusBsitores de rebus 
 eapitalibus primario, inter judices de rebus civilibus, senatori dignissimo, 
 perito baud minus quara fideli juris interpret! ; adeoque, in utroque 
 
 (a) Another difference between the real and the imagined judge is that Weir 
 was Lord Advocate, an office never held by M'Queen. 
 
 (6) MS. List. (c) lUd. 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BEAXFIELD 289 
 
 munere fungendo, scelera sive debita severitate puniendo, sive suum 
 cuique tribuendo et tuendo, prudentitia pariter atque justitia, insigni ; 
 hasce theses juridicas, surama cum observantia, sacras esse voluit 
 Gualterus Scott.(a) 
 
 Before entering upon the vexed question of Lord Brax- 
 field's conduct on the Bench let us see what manner of man 
 he appeared to his contemporaries, whose judgment is 
 worth bushels of posthumous censure, in the Elizabethan 
 sense of that term. And at the outset I may say that it 
 is not here proposed to invite the reader to eat of the 
 chestnut tree which is in the midst of Braxfield's garden : 
 the harvest is plenteous, but the fruit has lost by reason of 
 repeated gatherings its pristine flavour, and much of it 
 must be rejected as apocryphal. Yet a brace of anecdotes, 
 which I myself was the first to publish, may, if the citation 
 is permissible, be recalled without satiety. My Lord pre- 
 sided one Saturday at e'en at a circuit dinner in the King's 
 Arms, Dumfries. It was the last day of the sittings ; the 
 company was of the best, the fare and the wines were 
 equally commendable, and the sederunt was prolonged far 
 into the small hours of the Sabbath. Lord Hailes, the 
 other judge, for some reason had not been of the party and 
 probably bemoaned his loss. He called it "a shameful 
 debauch " — the grapes were sour — and remarked that at 
 least one reveller, Alexander Young, then acting as Clerk of 
 Justiciary, was too unwell to go to church next morning. 
 Braxfield, despite the heavy weather of the night before, 
 had been prominent among the worshippers, and took 
 occasion thus to admonish Young, who tells the story : "At 
 a rates ye should hae cam' to the kirk, for though mony 
 a scoondrel cams there regular, few honest men stays 
 away. "(6) The other tale I have in mind relates to old 
 James, Lord Braxfield's confidential man and long in his 
 service. One day James gave his master notice ; he must 
 
 (a) Latin Thesis on a Title of the Pandects: "De Cadaveribus Dainnatorum," 
 lull July 1792. — Advocates' Library. 
 
 (b) The Riddle of the Ruthvens, p. 51. 
 
 1<7 
 
290 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LOKD BEAXFIELD 
 
 leave at the next term. "What's wrang noo, James?" 
 inquired my Lord. " Naething but your Lordship's 
 temper ; ye're sae passionate,' was the reply. " Hoots, 
 man, what needs ye mind o' that?" said his master; "ye 
 ken weel it's nae sooner on than it's aff." " Very true, my 
 Lord," rejoined James, " hut then it's nae sooner aff than it's 
 on! "(a) 
 
 One of the earliest and best appreciations of Lord 
 Braxfield is that contained in the Scots Magazine already 
 cited. Published on the second anniversary of his death 
 and for readers who would be familiar with the personality 
 of the subject, it is absurd to suppose that the portrait is 
 not a more faithful likeness than Cockburn's. 
 
 Lord Justice-Clerk was an affectionate husband and a tender parent ; 
 he had a warmness of temper and benevolence of heart which made him 
 highly susceptible of domestic attachment. As a companion and a friend 
 he was peculiarly beloved by such as stood in those relations to him. He 
 had an openness of manners and was so easy of access that his friends 
 were never disappointed when they wished to have his advice. His 
 engaging, we may say fascinating manners rendered him a most agreeable 
 member of society. The company was always lively and happy of which 
 Lord Justice-Clerk was a member, (i) 
 
 I wonder whether Stevenson ever saw that statement, 
 which to me has about it the ring of truth, and whether had 
 he done so it would have affected his judgment, patently 
 taken captive by Cockburn. But what then would have 
 become of Archie Weir's tragedy ? 
 
 Lord Justice-Clerk was of middle size and robust make ; he was what 
 is commonly expressed by the terms hard featured, but had a small quick 
 eye and expressive countenance, impressive of mildness and intelligence.(c) 
 
 This description is borne out by the Raeburn portraits. 
 
 Hamsay, who walked the Parliament House with him, 
 says that when called to the Bench M'Queen was one of 
 the most popular characters at the Bar, " and what was 
 rare indeed, seemed to have no enemies." He describes 
 
 (a) The\Riddle of the Ruthvens, p. 64. 
 
 (b) Biographical Sketch, p. 388. (c) Ibid. 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 291 
 
 him as a man of vigorous, comprehensive mind, warm 
 affections, and communicative disposition ; a pleasing and 
 interesting companion. 
 
 If his wit and humour would have revolted Lord Chesterfield as 
 coarse and at times unseemly for his station, yet in his highest glee he 
 WHS always pleasant and good natured, most desirous to oblige and 
 inform. As a proof of his social powers there was a number of people 
 warmly attached to his person, who praised the qualities of his heart no 
 less than those of his head. Nothing, indeed, could exceed his zeal or 
 industry to serve the interest of his friends and allies. And he had reason 
 to plume himself on his success. 
 
 All his life he was fond of pleasure and not very 
 delicate or guarded in its pursuit. Though long accus- 
 tomed to mix with persons of good breeding and position 
 " he never could shake off his original manners or smooth 
 his rough corners." But it is probable from what we know 
 of the man that this was largely deliberate, and was 
 persisted in as a protest against the preposterous affecta- 
 tion of Anglicanism with which in the second half of the 
 century genteel Edinburgh was so fatuously smitten. 
 When Auld Reikie's "best" people were taking lessons 
 in the English tongue from an Irish actor (a) — whose only 
 title to remembrance it is to have begotten Richard 
 Brinsley Sheridan — we can imagine how Braxfield would 
 exaggerate his broad Scots and fortify the quality of his 
 humour. As Mr. Francis Watt has well observed of him 
 in his admirable study : " His seemed the voice of old 
 Scotland protesting against a degenerate and effeminate 
 time." (6) He swore "like an ensign of the last age in 
 his teens " and his after-dinner stories scandalised the 
 godly. Ramsay thought that in some ways he resembled 
 Robert Burns. At least, as we know on other authority, 
 he shared the poet's passion for Scottish song — and 
 doubtless also for " sculduddery," which a respectable 
 antiquary once defined for me as the universal language. 
 
 (a) Scots Magazine, 1761, p. 391. 
 (6) Terrors of the Law, 1902, p. 105. 
 
292 THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 The truth is that the so-called social amelioration which 
 Braxfield had lived to laugh at was mainly sham. 
 Fashionable folk read high-flown poetry and flatulent 
 novels, and rigidly observed a fantastic code of etiquette, 
 but despite their vaunted culture and refinement their 
 morality was even worse than their fathers'. " In no 
 respect," writes William Creech, " were the manners of 
 1763 and 1783 more remarkable than in the dignity and 
 delicacy of the one period, compared with the looseness, 
 dissipation and licentiousness of the other. Many people 
 ceased to blush at what would formerly have been 
 reckoned a crime."(a) He adds divers examples of 
 deterioration in manners and morals among the citizens 
 whom as Lord Provost he was called upon to govern, 
 ranging from the multiplication of brothels and the 
 alarming increase of serious crime, to the building of a 
 public cockpit. "The Ten Commandments," he quaintly 
 laments, " were as little known as obsolete Acts of 
 Parliament." In such a society Braxfield's failings would 
 seem less flagitious than they did to Henry Cock burn. (6) 
 
 A new and valuable light is thrown upon the personality 
 of Lord Braxfield by a manuscript memoir of his Lordship 
 written by Alexander Young of Harburn, W.S., which I 
 discovered in Edinburgh University Library and printed 
 for the first time in 1914.(c) Young, a lifelong friend of 
 Braxfield, knew Sir Walter intimately, and his assistance 
 is acknowledged by Lockhart in the preface to Scott's Life. 
 He wrote his reminiscences in 1838, as a protest against 
 the misrepresentation and injustice from which Lord 
 Braxfield's memory then suflered in connection with the 
 movement to erect on the Calton Hill a public memorial 
 to the "martyrs" of the political trials of 1793 and 1794, 
 
 (a) Edinburgh Fugitive Pieces, 1815, p. 101. 
 
 (6) "Coarse and illiterate; of debauched habits, and of grosser talk than 
 suited the taste even of his gross generation." — Sedition Trials, i. 86. 
 
 (c) Memoir of Robert Macqueen of Braxfield, Lord Justice-Clerk, by Alexander 
 Young Esq. of Harburn, W.S., Edinburgh, 1838.— Edinburgh University Library, 
 David Laing MSS. Div. ii. 113. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LOED BRAXFIELD 293 
 
 and for the purpose of vindicating his Lordship's character 
 as a man and a judge from undeserved aspersion. He also 
 wished to refute the famous "checkmate" story, fathered 
 upon Braxfield by Lockhart in his first edition. As to 
 the anecdote he achieved his purpose ; in his larger object, 
 so far as my judgment goes, he was equally successful. 
 
 During the whole of Lord Braxfield's progress from the time he left 
 the Bar until his death, I was in habits of strict intimacy and friendship 
 with him, in so much, that I believe hardly one week passed in all that 
 time in which I had not some intercourse with him either in town or 
 country, both during Session and Vacation. I humbly think, theiefore, 
 that unless I was totally unqualified to form a correct judgment of 
 character or had a very undue partiality and affection for him, I must 
 have known whether or not he merited that odium and reproach which 
 of late years has been cast on his conduct as a gentleman and his 
 proceedings as a judge. 
 
 This however I will take it upon me to say, that he was one of the 
 most kind, benevolent, cheerful and agreeable men I ever knew, most 
 hospitable and attentive in an eminent degree to all his neighbours, and 
 as a judge, I never till lately heard a public opinion uttered concerning 
 him except in praise. He was a great friend to dispatch in business, and 
 there never was insinuated any complaint of undue favour or partiality 
 displayed by him in the whole course of his judicial career, which is more 
 than I can say of some very eminent judges who sat on the Bench at the 
 time with him. 
 
 He was a very good scholar and particularly conversant with the Latin 
 classics, of which, as I was then pretty much master of the Latin language 
 myself, I thought I could form a correct judgment. In general literature 
 it appeared to me that he was somewhat deficient, and I remember well 
 that Shaftesbury's Characteristics, the works of Sir William Temple and 
 some of Swift's prose works were the only English authors which he said 
 to me he had read out and out and dipped into oftener than once. 
 
 The defects in his Lordship's character, I either had not the penetra- 
 tion to discover, or they were such as I at the time viewed with great 
 toleration and charity. In regard to his conviviality, admiration and 
 praise of the fair sex, having been often in Ireland, I thought his Lord- 
 ship as to these very much resembled some of the jovial spirits with 
 whom I had associated in that country. 
 
 Against this direct testimony to Lord Braxfield's 
 scholarship is the ipse dixit of Cockburn : " Except Civil 
 and Scotch (sic) Law, and probably two or three works 
 
294 THE BI-CENTENAEY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 of indecency, it may be doubted if he ever read a book 
 in his life '" ! {a) 
 
 Young introduced to Braxfield one of his Irish acquaint- 
 ances, named Patrick, "a considerable merchant in Dublin, 
 chiefly in the wine trade." This expert nicely differentiated 
 between the festive habits of Lord Braxfleld and those of 
 his fellow Senator, Lord Newton, the most eminent toper 
 in the annals of the Parliament House : — 
 
 Amongst the number of his acquaintances in Scotland Mr. Patrick 
 ranked several of my friends and particularly Lord Justice-Clerk M'Queen, 
 his son-in-law Lord Armadale, and Mr. Charles Hay of Newton, with all 
 of whom he said on his different visits to Scotland he could scarcely tell 
 whether his head or his heels were uppermost. Both Lord Braxfield and 
 Mr. Hay, he remarked, took a considerable quantity of wine, of which 
 the former was a judge, and the latter the greatest drinker ; that Lord 
 Braxfield was a great admirer of the fair sex, of which he thought Mr. 
 Hay made little account. . . . 
 
 That my friend Mr. Patrick had made a just estimate of two of his 
 Scotch acquaintances I think no doubt could be entertained, especially 
 that though they both indulged in taking a good deal of claret, Mr. Hay 
 was the most copious in his libations. In fact, much as I was in company 
 with Lord Braxfield, I can hardly say I ever saw him the worse of liquor 
 except on one particular occasion. 
 
 The exception occurred at Dumfries, when his Lordship 
 reproved Young for not going to church "the morning 
 after" ! Chambers mentions Braxfield as one of the habitues 
 of the famous house-of-call in the Potter Row kept by Lucky 
 Flockhart, immortalised as the Mrs. Flockhart of W^avei^ley ; 
 other constant customers were Lord Melville and the father 
 of Sir Walter Scott. (/>) Cockburn admits that Bacchus 
 had no easy victory over Braxfield, who never allowed his 
 potations to interfere with his work. " He was all his life 
 accustomed to rise at an early hour ; he was regular in his 
 attendance to business as a judge ; even in winter he was in 
 use to be upon the Bench at nine o'clock in the morning."(c) 
 Counsellor Pleydell, you remember, was equally precise in 
 
 (a) Sedition Trials, i. 87. 
 
 (6) Traditions of Edinburgh, 1825, ii. 292. 
 
 (c) Biographical Sketch, p. 388. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 295 
 
 his punctual daily attendance at the Parliament House. 
 Indeed, in view of the fierce and endless debaucheries of 
 the Edinburgh of that day, which killed Robert Fergusson 
 and permanently damaged Burns, Lord Braxfield should be 
 regarded in respect of liquor as a shining example of 
 moderation. It is said that after his death a subsequent 
 occupier of No. 13 George Square complained to the pro- 
 prietor who then owned the house that the wine cellar 
 was always full of water, and was informed that his late 
 Lordship, finding the cellar inadequate, had caused deepen 
 it, hence the invasion of the alien element. Of my Lord's 
 wine cellar at Braxfield there will be a word to say later. 
 
 Young gives us other interesting glimpses of Lord Brax- 
 field's tastes and ways. He was, it appears, so devoted 
 to cards that he carried a whist-table with him in his 
 travelling-coach when he " rode the circuit," and played 
 innumerable rubbers with his colleagues and the advocates- 
 depute, whereby the tedium of the journey was agreeably 
 beguiled. Sometimes the conditions were more arduous, 
 for in 1784 he and Charles Hope, afterwards Lord President, 
 literally rode a whole North Circuit, and the Findhorn 
 being in flood, were obliged to go twenty-eight miles up 
 the bank before they could find a bridge, (a) Four years 
 earlier, on Braxfield's appointment as a Lord of Justiciary 
 in succession to Lord Auchinleck, that gentleman's irre- 
 pressible offspring, James Boswell, published his amazing 
 pamphlet, in which he inveighed against the vices of the 
 criminal judges in general and their methods of conducting 
 circuits in particular. (6) How his Lordship viewed this 
 tactful and well-timed effusion is not recorded. 
 
 Braxfield was particularly fond of old Scots songs, 
 " taking equal delight in words and music," and Young has 
 preserved a pleasant picture of the post-prandial symposia 
 arranged " for providing entertainment to his Lordship in 
 
 (a) Cockburn's Circuit Journeys, 1889, p. 323. 
 
 (b) A Lttter to Robert Macqueen, Lord Braxfield, on his promotion to be one of 
 the Judges of the High Court of Justiciary. Edinburgh, 1780. 
 
296 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 that line." " Muirland Willie," " Fye, Let us a' to the 
 Bridal," and "My Jo Janet" were his special favourites, 
 with one rendering of which my Lord was never satisfied, 
 demanding repeated encores. We know, too, as appears 
 from a list of membership, dated 1st May 1775, (a) that he 
 belonged to the Edinburgh Musical Society, which met 
 in St. Cecilia's Hall at the foot of Niddry Street in the 
 Cowgate, described by Cockburn as " our most selectly 
 fashionable place of amusement." 
 
 There is no record of Braxfield's connection with sport, 
 and we cannot tell whether like other busy lawyers he 
 enjoyed on Bruntsfield Links " a turn at the golf on a 
 Saturday at e'en " ; but it is said that when at the Bar 
 he was captain of a Volunteer corps. His learned friend 
 Andrew Crosbie, the original Counsellor Pleydell of Guy 
 Maifinering, was likewise capable of other than purely legal 
 combat, being in command of the Edinburgh Defensive 
 Band during the American War — 
 
 Colonel Crosbie takes the field. 
 
 To B>ance and Spain he will not yield. (J) 
 
 Sir Walter Scott was an equally zealous volunteer. 
 
 Pious persons have been surprised and shocked by 
 Kamsay's remark that Lord Braxfield was in his own 
 estimation a sincere Christian. As a boy he had received 
 a strict religious upbringing, and of this, says Ramsay 
 quaintly, " he retained all along a due sense, being 
 thoroughly persuaded of its truth, though it did not 
 always produce suitable fruits or make him set a watch 
 on his lips." That his Lordship regularly conformed to 
 common religious practice appears from the fact that he 
 occupied as a heritor a pew of ten sittings in Lanark 
 Parish Church, of which he and all his family were 
 members. (c) In Edinburgh, both as advocate and judge, 
 
 (a) Saint Cecilia's Hall, 1899, p. 296. 
 (6) Chambers Traditions, ii. 257. 
 (c) MS. History of Braxfield. 
 
'A O 
 
 < r- 
 
 X z 
 
THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LORD BKAXFIELD 297 
 
 he was a seatholder in the Trou Kirk,(a) and subject to 
 the "jarrin' twang" of the doleful bell which so distressed 
 poor Fergusson. When on circuit, as we have seen, he 
 was punctilious in the article of church-going. Into 
 Lord Braxfield's spiritual state we are not here concerned 
 to pry, but it may be pointed out that he was wholly free 
 from any taint of that canting hypocrisy which has dis- 
 figured so many eminent professors. Neither was he in 
 the same case with such natures as Fergusson and Burns, 
 who were victims of the abnormal mental condition known 
 to experts in psychiatry as cyclothymia, wherein, to the 
 confusion of their biographers, remorse and despair alternate 
 with reckless realisation of the joy of living. Braxfield 
 was entirely sane. " So exuberant were his spirits," says 
 Ramsay, " that even in his sober hours he might be said 
 to be in a state little short of inebriety." No clouds of 
 so-called religious melancholy ever darkened that powerful 
 mind. Yet we cannot read his impressive judicial addresses 
 in passing sentence of death on such hapless criminals as 
 Deacon Brodie and James M'Kean without a very real 
 sense of my Lord's sincere concern for the eternal future 
 of the condemned. The famous obiter dictum touching 
 the Founder of our faith, alleged by Cockburn to have 
 been uttered upon the trial of Gerrald, has been accounted 
 blasphemous ; I shall have something to say about it later. 
 As Mr. Francis Watt has well observed of that and similar 
 sayings attributed to Lord Braxfield, they were probably 
 asides uttered during the proceedings, and meant only for 
 the private ear of his colleagues on the Bench, which, told 
 and retold out of Court, lost nothing in the telling. The 
 worst of them, the celebrated "checkmate" anecdote, has 
 been finally exploded. 
 
 In pronouncing moral judgments on the great figures 
 of history the mistake is often made of applying our 
 modern standards to their so difierent conditions. It is 
 
 (a) Butler'3 Tro7i Kirk of Edinburgh, 1906, pp. 306, 312. 
 
298 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORB BRAXFIELD 
 
 absurd, for instance, to estimate the conduct of Mary, 
 Queen of Scots, by the twopenny measuring- tape of to-day's 
 proprieties, or to regard the doings of Rob Roy from the 
 standpoint of a Collector of Customs and Excise. Those 
 who condemn Lord Braxfield as a crapulent and foul- 
 mouthed old pagan — " his religion railing and his dis- 
 course ribaldry " — are strangely ignorant or forgetful of the 
 manners of eighteenth-century Edinburgh. Everybody 
 drank too much, swore too hard, laughed at everything, 
 believed in little, and blushed at nothing. But one thing 
 Lord Braxfield did do, faithfully, with a single eye and an 
 undivided heart — his duty. It was a corrupt age, most 
 officials had their price, and he was above suspicion ; it 
 was a self-indulgent age, and he wrought late and early 
 at what work was given him to do ; it was a naughty age, 
 and he was a good husband, an affectionate father, a loyal 
 friend, and he left to his children the heritage of his high 
 reputation and an unstained name. If he sat too long 
 over the decanters, and if the raciness of his humour was 
 inordinately pronounced, these were foibles which many 
 of his contemporaries, honourable and upright men, were 
 content to share. His critics may be more nice of speech 
 and less robust of stomach, but most of them would be all 
 the better for some of his Lordship's brains. 
 
 It is in his capacity of a criminal judge alone that Lord 
 Braxfield's judicial deportment has been impugned ; the 
 ability and integrity of his conduct of civil causes is un- 
 questioned. Even Cockburn admits him a dexterous and 
 practical trier of ordinary cases, but calls him as a Lord of 
 Justiciary " a disgrace to the age," the " indelible iniquity " 
 of whose doings it is impossible too severely to condemn. 
 Harsh alike to prisoners and counsel, he was never more in 
 his element than in hounding with brutal and insulting 
 jeers some wretched culprit to the gallows. (a) Now I have 
 had occasion in another connection minutely to examine the 
 
 (a) Memorials of His Time, 1856, p. 115. 
 
THE BI-CENTENAEY OF LOKD BRAXFIELD 299 
 
 records of three capital cases at which Braxfield presided as 
 Lord Justice-Clerk, namely, those of Deacon Brodie in 
 1788, Major Kinloch in 1795, and James M'Kean in 1796, 
 and as all these trials, being very notable in their day, were 
 fully and accurately reported, they afford an excellent 
 opportunity to test the truth of Cockburn's allegations. 
 And with regard to Brodie's case, the thing that strikes 
 the professional reader is the amazing mildness of Lord 
 Braxfield in the face of John Clerk's intolerably rude and 
 violent demeanour to the Bench. When I first read the 
 suppressed passages, now printed in the report of the 
 trial, (a) I trembled at the doom which must await the 
 counsel who should so beard the savage Braxfield in his 
 lair, and expected Clerk to be sent straightway from 
 the bar to Botany Bay. (You perceive that I was yet in 
 thrall to Cockburn.) But my Lord bore these minatory 
 insults with dignified composure, and his leniency to the 
 offender speaks loudly for his patience and good nature. 
 As to the pannels, both the gallant Deacon and the pitiful 
 partner of his recreations were plainly guilty and the pre- 
 judice against them was intense, for what sympathy could 
 such housebreakers expect from a jury of responsible house- 
 holders ? Yet Braxfield saw to it that they had a fair trial, 
 and every latitude was given by him to the defence. The 
 admirable spirit of his final address to the prisoners I have 
 already commended. The Kinloch case is remarkable as 
 being the first in Scotland in which the criminal responsi- 
 bility of the insane was seriously considered. (6) Tried by 
 an incompetent or careless judge the result might well have 
 been a tragedy. The case was at once difficult and delicate 
 — the murder of a reigning baronet by his brother and heir, 
 a victim of delusional insanity, with lucid intervals — and 
 the position of the family, whose evidence was indispensable, 
 was peculiarly painful. Here, if anywhere, was the occa- 
 sion for a " coarse and dexterous ruffian " to let himself go. 
 
 (a) Trial of Deacon Brodie, 1906, pp. 177-180. 
 
 (b) Trial of Sir Archibald Gordon Kinloch, Edinburgh, 1795. 
 
300 THE BI-CENTENAEY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 But Lord Braxfield conducted the trial with the utmost 
 discretion and tact, and his statement of the law applicable 
 to the facts, as laid down in his charge to the jury, strikes 
 the modern mind as singularly sound and enlightened. 
 Should the Advocatus Diaholi object that in this case Lord 
 Braxfield's natural ferocity would be tempered by the 
 social rank of the parties, in the third of my trials at least 
 he had a free hand. (a) It was his last chance, for shortly 
 thereafter his health broke down and the High Court of 
 Justiciary knew him no more. The prisoner was a sancti- 
 monious shoemaker who butchered a carrier for banknotes, 
 with every aggravation of craft and cruelty. He admitted 
 his guilt, but in view of the enormity of the crime Braxfield 
 directed evidence to be led, and the pannel was allowed to 
 cross-examine witnesses and to make a canting appeal for 
 mercy. My Lord, in pronouncing sentence, sought to bring 
 home to the wretch the dreadful nature of his act, and 
 earnestly exhorted him to repentance, in words which 
 might well befit a righteous judge of to-day. 
 
 I lack space for even a cursory examination of Lord 
 Braxfield's conduct of the trials for sedition in 1793 and 
 1794, of which I have elsewhere given some account,(?>) 
 and shall here confine myself to a brief relation of the 
 rebuttino- evidence offered to Cockburn's indictment of 
 the Lord Justice-Clerk. I wish that every reader of the 
 Memorials might supplement its perusal by a review 
 written on its publication with admirable sense and judg- 
 ment, which ought to be reprinted as a prophylactic 
 appendix in all future editions of that work.(c) The 
 defects under which Cockburn labours as an historian — 
 party prejudice and partiality for telling good stories — and 
 the errors and exaggerations into which he is thereby 
 
 (a) Report of the trial of James M'Kean, Caledonian Mercury^ 15th December 
 1796. 
 
 (6) The Riddle of the Ruthvens, pp. 56-63. See also Biographical Sketch in 
 the Scots Magazine, before cited, and the volume for n9i, passim. 
 
 (c) The Laiv Magazine and Laiv Review, 1856, i. 233-252. 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXEIELD 301 
 
 betrayed, are convincingly exposed. I am not, however, 
 concerned with these faihngs further than as they affect 
 our " subject." As to his strictures upon Lord Braxfield's 
 behaviour on these occasions the reviewer says : — 
 
 We have examined the Reports, which are all to be found in Vol. 
 XXIII. of the State Trials, so ably and carefully edited by Mr. Howell, 
 and we find nothing whatever to maintain the charge against Lord 
 Braxfield. He concurs in the sentences moved and supported by his five 
 brethren ; and it must be observed of those sentences, that excepting in 
 the cases of Muir and Gerrald, perhaps also of Margarot, the sentences 
 about the same time pronounced in England were more severe, and even 
 long afterwards, for the same offences. . . . That Lord Braxfield had 
 any more prominent share in those sentences than his brethren does in no 
 manner of way appear. (a) 
 
 Of the " blasphemous " story before referred to about our 
 Saviour as a reformer, for which Cockburn is the sole 
 authority, the reviewer remarks — 
 
 Now we have made full inquiry into this most extraordinary assertion, 
 and we find that the words put into the judge's mouth were known in 
 Edinbui'gh to be a mere invention, a jest that passed current at the time 
 and was by all who heard it known to have — most men said — no founda- 
 tion at all, while some few believed, or affected to believe, one part of the 
 dictum, saying that Lord Braxfield might have muttered, " Muckle he 
 made o' that"; but all, without exception, utterly denied the grossly 
 indecent addition. . . . But for our peremptory contradiction of the 
 story we refer rather to what is well known to all who lived at the time, 
 that the speech was universally treated as a mere jocular invention, by 
 way of very gross caricature of the chief. (6) 
 
 The "checkmate"' anecdote was killed long ago; I 
 hope that this "blasphemous" myth may join it in limbo. 
 Finally, with regard to Cockburn's general vituperation of 
 the Justice-Clerk the reviewer observes — 
 
 The holding up Lord Braxfield as " the Jeffreys of Scotland " is if 
 possible more intolerable. None, even of that most able and learned, 
 though coarse and even violent judge's enemies, ever presumed to insinuate 
 the least suspicion of corruption against him. Nay, all who were 
 acquainted with him have borne testimony to his amiable and kindly 
 disposition. He is described by the late venerable Lord President Hope, 
 
 (a) 27ie Laiv Magazine and Law Review, 1856, i. 244. 
 (6) Ibid., p. 246. 
 
302 THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 in a letter which appeared in the first number of the Law Review, vindicat- 
 ing him from another calumny circulated on Sir Walter Scott's authority 
 [the "checkmate" story], as a person of a kindly nature, and a warm and 
 steady friend. He is well known to have had an extreme abhorrence of 
 anything mean and base, and his feelings were more warm than even his 
 temper was hasty. That he was of the most scrupulous integrity, of the 
 highest sense of honour in all respects, both public and private, none have 
 ever doubted ; and this is the person whom Lord Cockburn, inspired with 
 the bitter feelings of party, thinks it fit to compare with the worst man, 
 the most profligate and corrupt judge, that ever polluted the Bench. (a) 
 
 Young's prophetic refutation of Cockburn's calumnies 
 may be read at large in my former article. His defence is 
 of great weight, as stated by an eyewitness, a lawyer, a 
 gentleman and a Whig ; its length forbids quotation here, 
 but the concluding paragraph, in which he sums up his 
 case, must be repeated — 
 
 Of all men that ever lived, I think the greatest injustice has of late 
 been done to the memory of Lord Justice-Clerk M'Queen. I knew him 
 intimately from the first moment I came to Edinburgh, and I can truly 
 declare that he was not merely a great lawyer and an excellent judge, 
 but a most humane, kind-hearted and benevolent man, a friend and 
 benefactor to all the lower classes, a most hospitable and excellent land- 
 lord ; and in my humble opinion, though he was a Tory and sometimes 
 rallied me on being a Whig, he never allowed political feelings to influence 
 his conduct as a judge. When he acted in that capacity in the trials of 
 the men, who are now termed the " Scots Martyrs," I do not remember 
 that there was any diff"erence of opinion betwixt him and the other judges 
 on the Bench. They all joined in the same exposition of the Scotch law 
 of sedition, nor did I then hear of one imputation on the characters of any 
 one of them, or of the imputed "martyrdom" of the poor enthusiasts 
 Muir and Gerrald, or the democratic agitator and blackguard Margarot. 
 
 Now, indeed, the Justice-Clerk is represented as having been an 
 unprincipled, despotic judge, and placed on the same level with Jeffreys 
 and those who had formerly figured in that line, whilst the most atrocious 
 falsehoods are daily circulated regarding his brutal conduct to criminals 
 in the Court where he presided ; all which I solemnly declare, as far as I 
 know, and I had the best cause of knowledge as to most of them, as I slmll 
 answer to God, are false and utterly destitute of truth. 
 
 When the sedition trials were discussed in Parliament, 
 Lord Mansfield, who then held the office of Lord Justice- 
 
 («) The Laiv Magazine and Laiv Review, 1856, i. 247. 
 
THE BI-CENTENARY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 303 
 
 General, said : "I have not the pleasure of personal 
 acquaintance with the Lord Justice-Clerk, but 1 have long 
 heard the loud voice of fame, that speaks of him as a man 
 of pure and spotless integrity, of great talents, and of a 
 transcendent knowledge of the laws of his country."(a) 
 
 Of my Lord in his social relations Cockburn declares 
 that his fellow judges " were no friends to Braxfield 
 privately. His mere indecency was sufficient to debar 
 much personal intercourse. Abercromby, in particular, 
 abhorred him."(6) Yet by his own account not any of their 
 Lordships were worthy of respect or likely to be nice in 
 their company. Dunsinnan and Henderland were "undis- 
 tinguished," Abercromby was "absurdly" called by Baron 
 Hume an ornament of the Bench, Swinton was " heavy and 
 slow," and Eskgrove " an avaricious, indecent old wretch. "(c) 
 It should be superfluous to add that all these gentlemen 
 were Tories. Lord Cockburn's judicial colleagues might 
 indeed pray to be delivered from the scope of his remin- 
 iscences. As Bosola says in the play — 
 
 The office of justice is perverted quite 
 When one thief hangs another. 
 
 We know from Alexander Young that Sir David Dairy mple. 
 Lord Hailes, a man of high lineage, wide culture and 
 acknowledged worth, was on the best of terms with Brax- 
 field, despite the fact that my Lord said of him that he 
 " kent naething o' a cause but the neuks"; and that the 
 only judge with whom he had no personal intimacy was 
 Lord Kames, whose charming vale to his brethren on his 
 retiral from the Bench — "Fare ye a' weel, ye bitches!" — 
 one might have expected to appeal to Braxfield. 
 
 Lord Braxfield was twice married. By his first wife, 
 a niece of Sir Andrew Agnew of Lochnaw, the last 
 hereditary Sheriff of Galloway, he had two sons and two 
 daughters. The elder son, Robert Dundas, was bred to 
 the Bar but never practised, married Lady Lilias Mont- 
 
 (a) Pari Hist., xxxi. 283. (6) Sedition Trials, i. 86, n. (c) Ihid. 
 
304 THE BI-CENTENAKY OF LORD BRAXFIELD 
 
 gomerie, daughter of the twelfth Earl of Eglinton, succeeded 
 on his father's death to the lands of Braxfield, Broughton 
 and Hardington, and died without issue in 1816. John, 
 the second son, entered the Army, became a captain in the 
 28th Regiment of Foot, and married an Irish lady of good 
 family, their son succeeding to the entailed estates. Mary, 
 the elder girl, married Sir William Honyman of Armadale, 
 a Lord of Session; the younger, Catherine, married 
 Macdonald of Clanranald. By his second marriage with a 
 dauo-hter of Lord Chief Baron Orde, Braxfield had no 
 children. High alliances these, for Cockburn's "coarse 
 ruffian " and his family to compass. 
 
 New evidence as to the social consideration in which 
 Lord Braxfield was held came to light on the discovery, 
 during alterations at No. 13 George Square, of certain 
 visiting- cards and dinner invitations addressed to the 
 Justice-Clerk and his wife, which were found beneath the 
 flooring of one of the upper rooms. It is curious that by 
 the chance preservation of these pieces of pasteboard Lord 
 Braxfield's position in Edinburgh society should be ascer- 
 tainable. For particulars of this trouvaille I am indebted 
 to the article by Mr. Forbes Gray already cited. Among 
 the calling cards are those of the wife of Admiral Duncan, 
 the hero of Camperdown ; of Lady Christina Graham ; and 
 of Mrs. Brown, wife of the architect of George Square — 
 the latter, by the way, a forebear of the present writer. 
 The invitations include two from Sir James and Lady 
 Colquhoun of Luss to their house in St. Andrew Square, 
 one from the Lord Advocate and Mrs. Dundas, George 
 Square, and another from Mr. and Mrs. Macdonald of 
 Clanranald, Princes Street. For " an illiterate ruffian of 
 debauched habits" this company is pretty well. 
 
 One of Lord Braxfield's most intimate friends was Sir 
 Andrew Agnew of Lochnaw, whose niece he afterwards 
 married, (a) The Justice-Clerk's relations with his first 
 
 (a) The Hereditary Sheriffs of Galloway, 1893, ii. 354 358. 
 
THE r,r-CEXTEXAKY OF LORD BKAXFIELD 305 
 
 wife's family were always cordial, and when in 1789 Sir 
 Stair Agncw's daughter was to be married, all arrange- 
 ments as to settlements were placed in Lord Braxtield's 
 hands,(a) The only letter of liis which I have seen — 
 probably he was no great letter-writer — was upon this 
 occasion. Written in a clear, almost feminine hand, its 
 genial tone shows his Lordship's character in a benignant 
 aspect : — 
 
 Stirling, 10 l:iept. 1789. 
 
 Dear Sir, — Yours I received this morning. I have perused the scroll 
 with attention, and in general think it well drawn. However, in order 
 to prevent any dispute [he otters various pertinent suggestions, concluding 
 thus :] And now permit me to wish you and your daughter much joy 
 and happiness in the intended marriage. She is an amiable young person, 
 and possessed of the sweetest temper and disposition, which bids fair for 
 making a happy marriage. Indeed she is so much possessed of my good 
 opinion that if it should prove otherwise — which God forbid ! — I should 
 pronounce it not the fault of her. So there is no reason to be apprehensive 
 of any such event. 
 
 Mrs. M'Queen, who is with me here, desires to join with me in love 
 and best wishes to you and the bride. And I am, dear Sir, your most 
 
 obedient humble servant, 
 
 Robert M'Queen. 
 Sir Stair Agnew of Lochnaw, Bart. (ft) 
 
 I will leave it at that : the reader has now before him 
 both sides of the Braxfield case and can pronounce his 
 own judgment. Lord Cockburn has had the Bench to 
 himself lono' enouoh. 
 
 For two years before his death Lord Braxfield, whose 
 physical powers had been as great as those of his intellect, 
 fell a prey to a complication of diseases. Li the summer 
 of 1798 these complaints were much increased, and by the 
 New Year his condition was hopeless. He died at No. 13 
 George Square on 30th May 1799, having just crossed 
 the threshold of his seventy-eighth year, and on otli June 
 was laid to rest in the family burial-place at Lanark. 
 
 {a\ The llereditarij Sheriffs of (InUov-ay, 1893, ii. 387. 
 {b) Ibid., pp. 388-381). 
 
 20 
 
306 THE BI-CEXTEXARY OF LOKD BEAXFIELD 
 
 What his fellow-countrymen thoug-ht of him as a citizen 
 and a judge may be read in his obituary notices. (a) 
 
 I made one autumn day a sentimental journey to bis 
 grave and birthplace. He lies beneath the ruined walls 
 of St. Kentigern's forsaken shrine, over against high Tinto 
 and the sunset. Strangely enough, although three of his 
 descendants are commemorated, the headstone does not 
 bear his name. The house of Braxfield stands upon the 
 pleasant slopes of a green and watered valley, shaded by 
 immemorial trees and girt about with undulating pastures, 
 while ever on the ear falls the murmurous song of Clyde. 
 The mansion, four square, with a courtyard in the centre — 
 the back said to be older than the front — is now unoccupied, 
 and fast tending to decay. With its many chambers, 
 curious stairways, and stone-vaulted passages, it would be 
 in the past a very paradise of childhood. At some personal 
 risk I penetrated to the subterranean secrets of the wine 
 cellar — a commodious catacomb, whither my Lord, candle 
 in hand, must often have preceded me in quest of buried 
 treasures. Bat the goodly bins hold nothing now save 
 cobwebs and the detritus of their ancient strength. At 
 some distance from the house, in a sheltered hollow of 
 the park, is a great old-world garden, its masoned walls 
 enclosing flower-embroidered borders and wandering alleys. 
 You can fancy the old judge pacing these paths on sunny 
 afternoons in vacance time, unmindful of Lord Stair and 
 of the Dutch civilians. For it is here, amid the scenes so 
 close to his affections where every hour he could command 
 was spent, that his memory peculiarly abides. The Edin- 
 burgh that he knew has vanished ; George S(|uare is trans- 
 formed, the courtroom in which he so long held sway is 
 gone. Only here, under these age-old trees beside the 
 ageless river, would Lord Braxfield's spirit feel at home. 
 
 By a singular irony of circumstance Braxfield House 
 was after 1808 tenanted for a time by Robert Owen (1771- 
 
 {a) Edinburgh Magccdne, July 1799, p. 80; Scots Mayazine, July 1799, p. 496. 
 
THE BT-CENTENARY OF LOKD liEAXFIELD 307 
 
 1858), the father of* New Lanark, a pioneer of Socialism 
 and a harbourer of Iladicals.(a) How my Lord would 
 have regarded this invasion of his sacred hearth may be 
 awfully imaoined. In 1914 the property passed from the 
 Braxfield f^xmily into other hands. Of the last M'Queen 
 of Braxfield, John Rainier M'Queen, great-grandson of the 
 Justice-Clerk and last lineal inheritor of his lands and Tory 
 principles, an interesting account is given by Mr. Bernard 
 Holland. (/j) It is the end of " an aidd sang." 
 
 I have ever pitied the hard fortune of the dead in their 
 incapacity to combat posthumous aspersion. The nimble 
 brain, the ready arm, so vigilant to justify and to defend, 
 no longer guard the citadel from presumptuous foes. Once 
 a man is buried any dog may bark about his grave. Our 
 memories are at the mercy of the first comer minded to 
 cast a stone, and our hope rests only in the charity of our 
 survivors. De mortuis is comfortable counsel ; but Sir 
 Thomas Browne's plea for civility to the ashes of our 
 forefathers too often falls upon deaf ears. Elsewhere 
 I have sought to rescue Robert Fergusson from the 
 opacities of purblind editors. Li the present case my task 
 has been less onerous : on the one hand is the white 
 light of contemporary evidence ; on the other, the partial 
 ra}^ of Lord Cockburn's Whiggish lantern. "Whoever 
 puts Fergusson right with fame," wrote Stevenson once, 
 "cannot do better than dedicate his labours to the memory 
 of Burns, who will be the best delighted of the dead." 
 Wherefore I am bold to devote to the creator of AVeir of 
 Hermiston this essay in vindication of his great exemplar. 
 
 ((() Life of Robert Owen, 1857, passim. 
 
 (h) Blackwood's Magazine, December 1913, pp. 816-823. 
 
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BV 
 
 NEILL AND CO., LTD. 
 
 EDINBURGH. 
 
By the Same Author 
 
 The Riddle of the Ruthvens 
 
 AND OTHER STUDIES 
 
 By WILLIAM R0U6HEAD 
 
 With 13 Illustrations. 8vo, 544 pages, buckram, 10s. 6d. net 
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 The Riddle of the Ruthvens 
 
 The Real Braxfield 
 
 The Husband of Lady Grange 
 
 The Pack of the Tkavelling Mek- 
 
 CHANT 
 
 auld auchindrayne 
 "Antique " Smith 
 The Abduction of J^an Kay 
 The Witches of North Berwick 
 Bargarran's Daughter 
 
 The Devil in Pittenwekm 
 The Law and Mrs. Yelvekton 
 NicoL MuscHET : His Crime and Cairn 
 The Master of Sinclair and the 
 
 Fifteen 
 The Toll of the "Speedy Return" 
 The Adventures of David Haggart 
 Mackcoull and the Begbie Mystery 
 With Braxfield on the Bench 
 A Note on Robert Fergusson 
 
 SOME PRESS OPINIONS 
 
 The Bookman. — "Mr. Roughead is a lawyer after Scott's own heart. Had Sir 
 Walter been alive to-day it is easy to conceive how these two perfervid investigators 
 would have worked to each other's hands, and the collaboration would have been a 
 fortunate one for Scottish Letters. Mr. Roughead is a perfect mine of information on 
 the criminal annals of Scotland. In that connection he has already done important and 
 admirable service. Had ]\Ir. Lang lived to read this latest volume, he would have 
 rejoiced over it as a contribution to Scottish Criminology unsurpassed by the in- 
 defatigable Pitcairn himself. Mr. Houghead is not merely a diligent researchei' in a 
 domain which he has made peculiarly his own. He is also au accomplished literary 
 stylist, and has in him the makings of an acceptable and successful novelist were he so 
 minded to turn his pen in that direction. Witliin his vast and erudite storehouse — the 
 gatliering of years — there is no lack of material in respect of intrigue, and incident, and 
 human characterisation, for tlie business of a modern romantic. Mr. Lang, as one 
 happens to know, peru.sed Mr. Roughead's ' Trials" with avidity ; and it is certain that 
 H. L. Stevenson, no less than Walter Scott, woidd have been glad to seek for treasure in 
 the same rich and varied fielil. All'. Roughead, however, confines his attention almost 
 entirely to the purely legal aspect of his studies and only to what is genuinely historic 
 
 in the episode with wiiich he is dealing An exceptionally notable jiiece of work. 
 
 It is by far the best thing Mr. Roughead has done. There is not a dull page in his 
 book, nor can there be a reader who will not ask for yet another series of these so 
 satisfying and fascinating mystery tales of a country that contains so much of the 
 mysterious and romantic elements." 
 
 The Spectator. — "Mr. Andrew Lang is no longer here to guide us down tiie 
 byways of .Scottish history, but he has a worthy disciple in Mr. Roughead, wliose new 
 book is of absorbing interest. Mr. Roughead is well known to students of criminology 
 by his editions of famous trials, including tliose of Captain Porteous and of Deacon 
 Brodie, and by his collection of Twelve Scots Trials. In his new volume he begins with 
 the grim mystery commonly known as tlie Cowrie Conspiracy, and discusses other 
 episodes that receive passing mention from the historinn. But h^ also deals with some 
 of the stranger cases in Scottish triminal records, which will lie new, we imagine, even 
 to most Scottish readers. His concluding chapter on Robert Fergusson, the gifted 
 young Edinburgh poet wlio might, had he lived, have rivalled Burns, is interesting and 
 sympatlietie 
 
 "Mr. Roughead's fascinating book includes, among other tilings, the murder of a 
 travelling pedlar in Assynt, Sutherland, by a young schoolmaster, notable for the fact 
 
SOME PRESS OPINIONS— contmued 
 
 tliat the j)efllar's missing pack was discovered by means of a dream. In tliis case the 
 evidence was purely circumstantial, Imt the criminal, after being condemned, made a 
 full confession. There is, too, the strange matrimonial case of Mrs. Yelverton, which 
 interested our fatheis in the "sixties.' We must add, in conclusion, that the author's 
 vindication of Lord Braxfield is convincing." 
 
 The Saturday Review.— "Scotch crime is not yet exhausted. The present 
 volume consists of studies reprinted from the Juridical Jli:ineu\ with one added from 
 the Scottish HUtiirircil. There is no want of variety. Tlie Gowrie Mystery, the 
 Yelverton Case, the character of Lord Braxfield, the murder of Begbie, the Bank Porter : 
 these are specimens. The book begins and takes its title from the Gowrie conspiracy : 
 that is the riddle of the Ruthvens . . . , 
 
 "'The Real Braxfield,' along with 'Braxfield on the Bench,' a latei- essay, puts 
 forward a new view of the great Lord Justice Clerk, Mr. Rfiughead's volume reminds 
 us, often, of Paget's Paradoxes and Puz.Ics ; and as that acute historian added to his 
 collection of old crimes a study of "Whig exaggerations in Macaulay, so Mr. Roughead 
 sets himself to correct the similar, though much slighter, injustice of Henry Cockburn 
 towards the judge who took such pleasure in trying Friends of the People for 
 sedition 
 
 " But this notice of ilr. Roughead is turning into mere repetition of his stories ; and 
 what el.se can one do] One must not stop, however, without acknowledgment and 
 thanks for the last essay in the book, which is the story of Robert Fergusson, the young 
 Edinburgh poet, including plenty of quotations, and helping (as Mr. Roughead indicates) 
 to make up the strange omission of the poet's name, and neglect of his valuable evidence 
 by ' Edinburgh '.« Latest Historian.'" 
 
 The Outlook. — "Mr. Roughead is already well known as the author of Twelve 
 Scots Trials and other books dealing with crimes and criminals, and any work from his 
 pen is assured a ready welcome from the reading public. In the present book Mr, 
 Roughead opens with the story of the Gowrie 'Conspiracy,' that mysterious attempt 
 upon the life and liberty of James VI., Avhich has occupied the attention of the curious 
 and the sceptical for many years 
 
 " Interesting, however, as is this story of the Gowrie conspiracy, and good as are those 
 of other crimes, involving lesser people, which follow, the most valuable papers in the 
 book are those in which quite a new light is thrown upon the character of Robert 
 M'Queen, Lord Braxfield, who. vilified by Cockburn, and libelled by almost everyone 
 who has written of him, has been immortalised by Stevenson in IFeir of Hermiston. 
 The figure that emerges from Mr. Roughead's inquisition is that of a great lawyer, a 
 shrewd if coarse wit. a just judge, and a man of strong and respectable character, A 
 man, in fact, whose mental and moral attitude is in harmony witli his physical appear- 
 ance as handed down to us by Raeburn. Of the other papers that go to make up a most 
 interesting volume, we may single out for especial mention, 'The Pack of the Travelling 
 Merchant,' which deals with the murder of Murdoch Grant, a Scots pedlar, by a young 
 schoolmaster ; and the story of ' Antique Smith,' whose forgeries of valuable autographs 
 in the last decade of the last century cre;ited considerable stir in Edinburgh. But, after 
 all, these are but two out of many, all good. The book, indeed, should prove a mine of 
 wealth for the novelist and playwright." 
 
 The Times Literary Supplement. — "This is an ingenious and entertaining 
 book, by a wiiter who has already introduced large numbers of interested und often 
 amused readers to the intricacies of Scots law and the complexities of Scottish murder 
 cases 
 
 " In ' The Toll of the " Speedy Return" ' .Mr, Roughead deals with the once famous 
 case of Captain Green, an English mariner who was hanged in Edinburgh in 170r>, on a 
 charge of piracy. The English Government did not dare to advise Queen Anne to send 
 a reprieve ; if she had done so ' there is little doubt that the Porteous tragedy would 
 not have lacked a preeedent,' so strongly did po}iular feeling run against the prisoner. 
 ilr. Roughead brings fresh evidence to show that Green was probably a pirate ; but he 
 agrees with previous investigators that he was not proved to be guilty of the particular 
 otience for which he suffered death, Mr. Roughead deals largely with cases of witch- 
 craft. These, indeed, are less of a puzzle than they were ; for incidents in the 'spy 
 mania' of the early years of the war have shown that the sources of human credulity, in 
 times of excitement, are not yet dried uj), and it is easy to understand how the accusa- 
 tions against the witches received credence. In "'A Note on Robert Fergusson' he 
 touches a theme outside the general purport of the book and gives us a sketch wliich errs 
 only in being too short and is full of understanding knowledge." 
 
 W. GREEN AND SON, LIMITED, EDINBURGH 
 
By the Same Author 
 
 Twelve Scots Trials 
 
 By WILLIAM ROUGHEAD 
 
 With 13 Illustrations. 8vo, 302 pages, buckram, gilt top, 7s. 6d. net 
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 The Parson of Spott, 1570 
 
 The Doom of Lady WAraiisTON, 1600 
 
 Touching one Major Weik, a Wak- 
 
 LOCK, 1670 
 The Ordeal of Philii- Stanfield, 
 
 1688 
 The Gho.st of Sergeant Davis, 1754 
 
 Katharine Nairn, 1765 
 
 Keith of Northfield, 1766 
 
 "The Wife o' Denside," 1827 
 
 Concerning Christina Gilmouk, 1844 
 
 The St. Fergus Affair, 1854 
 
 The Dunecht Mystery, 1882 
 
 The Akran Murder, 1889 
 
 SOME PRESS OPINIONS 
 
 The Spectator.— " Tlie dark places of Scots ciinjiiiolo<j;3' have already yielded 
 literary treasure to those who, like Scott and Stevenson, knew wjiere to look lor it. But 
 the store is iuexhaustiblu, and personally we tind a flavour about the criminous annals of 
 the nortliern kingdom which is absent from the Newgate Calendars of more populous 
 lands. Mr. itougliead, wlio has done some excellent work in this branch of historical 
 research, gives us in the present volume a collection of short studies ranging from the 
 days of the Reformation to the recollection of our own age. He has precisely tlie kind of 
 style which is suited for a legal historian who would also be popular — clear, urbane, 
 witty, pleasantly allusive, reminding us now of J, B. Atlay and now of Andrew Lan^. 
 Indeed, of all writers living he seems most to have caught Lang's curious grace. He is 
 also an excellent teller of a story — no small gift in the chronicler. The studies, as we 
 liave said, cover a wide area, and embrace crimes into which some element of strangeness 
 entered, crimes which are still obscure, and crimes where the guilt is not seriously in 
 doubt." 
 
 The Saturday Review. — "Mr. Roughead, an able Scottish lawyer, has won a 
 reputation for his talent in the kind of work of which these trials are so excellent an 
 example. xMr. Andrew Lang claimed him as a fellow-student of legal and historical 
 mysteries, and these 'criminal biographies' were suggested by J\lr. Lang ; they were read 
 by him in manuscrijit, and he had intended to write an Introduction. They are not 
 edited reports, but studies by .Mr. Roughead based upon the facts, the personages, and 
 the times of tl;e particular trials. Most of them owe very much of their interest to 
 Scottish historical, legendary, and traditional events, and to public and family ejtisodes 
 and })ersonages which give a picturesque and more than a forensic environment to the 
 actual trial. Mr. Roughead is, in short, as much antiquary as student of criniinolofy, 
 and he has a literary taste which avoids tlie unnecessarily sordid and brutal. None of 
 these trials is hackneyed ; they are all unfamiliar and of first impression." 
 
 The Outlook. — "Mr. Houghead has secured a great reputation for hi.s admirable 
 editing of notable Scottish trials, especially those of Deacon Brodieand Captain Porteous ; 
 and in the present volume, in spite of the fact that the recorded trials are of less intrinsic 
 
 consequence, he has fully maintained the high quality of his previous work 
 
 Each case presents some peculiar point of interest, either of evidence or criminal 
 psychology, and the analysis of the motives for the crimes and the evidence j)roduced 
 is excellent. Mr. Amlrew Lang read the book in manuscriiit. and had he lived would 
 have contributed an Introduction ; and we cannot give the author higher praise than to 
 say it is, in our opinion, a work in eveiy way worthy of the commendation of that line 
 connoisseur of mysteries and keen sifter of evidence," 
 
 W. GUKEN A.\D 80^', LLMITED, KDIJN ULKGH 
 
^t^' 
 
 .,^v^ 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 Los Angeles 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below 
 
 
 Form L9-Series 4939 
 
1 1 II null II ill nil II mill III nil 
 
 3 1158 00752 
 
 III! nil II nil III 
 
 5008 
 
 i/iC.^ 
 
 SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACIl 
 
 See Spine for 
 Barcode Number