5mrTnrrmTBinBmrfimnifm^rmtii'r''rT*r*r! "vTrf'infifi'i!!' o O \>^h "7f .^ %i THE ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR : BEING A GUIDE TO BuilUers, iiraugljtsmtn, ^tuUents, antj SSaoriimtn, STUDY, DESIGN, AND EXECUTION OF ARCHITECTURE CONTAirs'INO COMPREHENSIVE COMPARATIVE TABLES OF THE RESPECTIVE PROPORTIONS OF EACH MEMBER OF THE ORDERS OF ANTIQUITY, AND THOSE OF THE MODERN MASTERS ; AND DETAILED TABLES PRESENTING THE DIMENSIONS OF EVERY MOULDING IN THE ORDERS OF VIGNOLA. TOGSTHER WITH i^Iatee stiotoiiig tfjc l^artirular jform of cacfj Dtstiiirt i3art, AND THE DIFFERENT METHODS OF TRACING THEM ; WITH ARCADES ADAPTED TO THE SEVERAL ORDERS, WHEN EMPLOYED EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT PEDESTALS THE PUREST EXAMPLES OF ALL THE OTHER PARTS WHICH ENTER INTO THE COMPOSITION OF EDIFICES ; THE -WHOLE REDUCED TO MODULES AND MINUTES, OR PARTS; POLLO-WED BT ?3Ian6, (Slebattons. anU Sections of barious JSuiltrtugs anU iSUifires : TO WHICH ARE ADDED, A HISTORY OF THE ART FROM ITS ORIGIN: A DESCRIPTION OF, AND OBSERVATIONS ON. THE MOST CELEBRATED ANTIQUE AND MODERN EDIFICES: A DEVELOPMENT OF TH ESSENCE OF THE ART, EMBRACING THE IDEAS OF ORDER, SYMMETRY, VARIETY, HARMONY, UNITY, BEAUTY, INVENTION, ETC. : A MINUTE EXAMINATION OP THE PARTICULAR QUALITIES AND SUITABLE EMPLOYMENT OF THE CONSTITUENT PARTS OF EDIFICES: A GLOSSARY OF ARCHITECTURE, CARPENTRY, JOINERY, MASONRY, BRICKLAYING, SLATING, PLUMBING, PAINTING, GLAZING, PLASTERING, ETC. By JOHN BILLINGTON, Architect. SerontJ ISUition, cyiratls enlarged. ILLUSTRATED BY NEARLY ONE HUNDRED PLATES AND TABLES. LONDON: HENRY G. BOHN, YOIIK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1848. ■ PREFACE. A WORK on Architecture which would supply the place of a great number of books that treat only on distinct parts of the subject, and also present a clear and perspicuous detail of the theory and practice of the art, has long been a desideratum, both to the practical man and the student. Indeed, a knowledge of the theory and beauties of architecture, concerns almost all ; since it is only by the possession of this knowledge, that architectural productions can be appreciated. In order to give au increased interest to the present work, and to facilitate the attainment of a correct taste, a comprehensive history of the art is given, from its origin to the present time ; con- taining an ample description of the most celebrated antique and modern edifices, a comparison of the .styles of the different artists who executed them, and a brief notice of their beauties and defects It furnishes a body of useful and interesting information, which is rendered still more complete, by the com- parative tables thitt accompany the detailed explana tions of the orders; in which will be found a com- parison of the general proportions, according to which the different parts of each of the orders were executed, in the most celebrated edifices of antiquity. To these are added the proportions assigned to them ])y modern masters. Each of the constitutcnt parts of edifices, and also what relates to distribution and decoration, IV PREFACE. are treated on at considerable length. The sources whence the art derives its means of expressing- character are fully developed ; and are offered to the notice of the student, as worthy his most serious attention. In illustration of the historical portion of the work, the examples furnished by Italy have been offered. These are not given as copies for servile imitation, nor are they supposed to be entirely exempt from faults ; neither must it be forg'otten that our climate, mate- rials, and customs, often prescribe other forms than those which they exhibit. The liberty has been taken of divesting them of everything that might be considered injurious to their good effect. On construction, the necessary information will be found in the glossary ; which also contains an expla- nation of the terms used in the theory and practice of the art ; and comprises separate treatises on every branch relating to building. Landscape gardening, as connected with architec- ture, is not omitted. The Author's object has been to produce a complete body of information ; in doing which, he has availed himself of assistance from the most valuable and authentic sources, both in England and France ; and he has endeavoured to condense and simplify the opinions of others, in uniting them with his own. Should his labours conduce to the advancement of architectural knowledge, his desires will be realized ; and his labours will be repaid by the gratifying con- sciousness of their utilitv. CONTENTS PAGE What arcliUectiire is ; and the knowledge requisite to an architect ___---- 1 In what architecture consists - - - - - 10 On the origin of each of the constituent parts of archi- tecture - - - - - - - -15 A brief review of the progress of the antique achitec- ture, from the earliest oeriod to the last century - 49 The antique orders - - - - - -115 Of the five orders in general - - - - .117 P'pTe I . The five orders of Vignola. The general divisions of the five orders of architecture 118 The extreme proportions of the five orders of architec- ture. -" - - 119 The Tuscan order .,_._- 121 Comparative table of the general proportions assigned to the Tuscan order, by the most eminent modern masters. Table presenting the names and detailed proportion of the members and mouldings of which the Tuscan order is compored, according to Vignola. Manner of drawing the orders _ > « - 125 I'late 2. Mouldings 3. Tuscan order 4. Details of the Tuscan order. Of the arrangement of mouldings - - - - 127 The Doric order - - - - - - -130 Comparative table of the general proportions of the Doric order, from the most celebrated edifices of antiquity, together with those assigned to it by the most eminent modern masters. Detailed table of the mutule ana dencicu.ated Doric entablatures of Vignola, and the column and pedestal common to both. Plate 5. Miitulp Doric order. 6 Details of the mutule Doric order. ■ 7. Denticulated Doric order. ' 3. Details of the denticulated Doric order. The Ionic order. .-_.-. 142 Comparative table of the general proportions of the lonir order. VI CONTENTS. TAGS Detailed table of the Ionic order. Plate 9. Ionic order. 10. Details of the Ionic order. Of pikisters - - w - - - - 153 Plate 11. Capital of the Ionic pilaster. Method of tracing the Ionic volute - - - - 158 Plate 12 Drawing of ditto. The Corinthian order - - - - » -159 Comparative table of the Corinthian oruer Detailed table of the Corinthian order Method of tracing the Corinthian modi'iJion - - 174 Drawing of ditto. Corinthian order Details of the Corinthian order. Method of drawing the Corinthian capital - •• 1 74 Plate 15. Plan and elevation of the Corinthian capital «n front and at the angle. Corinthian pilaster - - - • - -17B Plate 16. Capital of the Corinthian pilaster. The Composite order - - - - - -177 Comparative table of the Composite order. Detailed table of the Composite order. Plate 17. Composite order. • 18. Details of the Composite order. Method of drawing the Composite capita - - 183 Plate 19, Plan and elevation of the Composite capital, in front and on the angle. Plate 20. Detailed elevations of the Corinthian and Composite capitals. Plate 21. Details of the soflBts of the five orders. To obtain a proportional gradation of the orders - 184 Plate 22. Gradation of the orders. Diminution and entasis of the shafts and columns - 185 Plate 23. Method of tracing the diminution and entasis of columns. Comparative table of the diminution of columns, taken from the be.st antique examples - - - - 186 Rules of proportion for the diminution which should be given to the superior diameter of the shafts of the different columns, according to their height, from fifteen to fifty feet 187 Plate 24. Manner of tracing ditto. Proportion of entablatures, according to the heights of olumns, after the manner of Vitruvius - - 188 P'ate 25. Drawing of ditto. Intercolumniations for sacreo and other public edifices, according to Vitruvius - - . - l90 Pediments, according to Vitruvius - - - - 191 late 26. Pronortion of pediments. CONTENTS. V:i PAGE Comparative table of the inclination of pediments and roofs, from antique and modern edi-fices - - 193 Intercolumniations, equally distanced, for edifices ot less importance, according to Vitnivius - - 193 Intercolumniations, given by Vignola - - - 194 Plate 27. Plans of intercolumniations of each of the orders. Application of columns to arcades - - - - 194 Plate ^17 . Plans of intercolumniations of columns without pedes- tals, applied to arcades. Plate 28. Elevations of the intercolumniations of the Tuscan order. with and wthout arcades. Plate 29. Doric ditto. 30, Ionic ditto. 31. Corinthian ditto 32. Plans of the intercolumniations of columns with pedes tals, applied to arcades. Plate 33. Elevation of the intercolumniation of the Tuscan oider with pedestals, applied to arcades. Plate 34. Elevation of the intercolumniation of the Doric order with pedestals, applied to arcades. Plate 35. Ionic ditto. 36. Corinthian ditto. 37. Imposts and archivolts of the five orde Comparative tible of the respective relations in the heights of columns, when employed above each other, with arcades in the same facade, taken from the most celebrated antique and modern examples - 197 Of rustics - - -_ - - - -liiii P.'ate 50, figures 7 and 8. Examples of the fonn and proportion of iiistics. Of doors 200 Plate 50, fig. 2. General proportion of doors. 40. Door under the portico of the pantheon, at Rome. 41. Rustic door of Vignola. 42. Doric door. — — 43. Door of S. Lorenzo in Damaso, at Rome. ■ 44. Details of ditto. ■ 45. Door of the saloon of Farnese palace. 46. Details of ditto. Of windows _-_..-- 203 Plate 50, fig. 1 . General proportion of windows. — — 50, fig. .3. Mezzaninas. 47. Window of the ground story of Farnese palace, in the fd¥)dicula ib. /Egicranes ib. iEolus ib. ./El arium jb. Agora ib. .*.ireeraent ib. Aisle ib. Air-holes ib. Air-trap il). .■Vlabaster 13 Alcove ib. .\lder ib Algebra ib .\IIcy 14 .\lms-house ib. Altar ib. Altar-piece ib. Altar-.' Axiom Authority Axis Axis Back of a Hip ib. Back of a Slate ib Backer ib. Balcony lb. Raluster ib. Balustrade - Ib. Band 36 Pt.aa Base 36 Basement ib. IJasilica ib. 3ass-relief 37 Bastard Stucco ib. Batten ib. Bitten Door ib. Batter. Battering ib. Bay ib. Bay Window ib. Bead ib. Beaking-joiat ib. Beam ib Bear 38 Bearing ib Bearer ib. Bed 39 Bed-moulding ib. Bed of a Slate ib. Bevel ib Bevel-joint ib. Biuding-j .ists ib. Bitumen ib. Bond 40 Bond of a Slate. Lap of a Slate 41 Bond-timber ib. Bottom-rail ib. Brace ib Breaking-joint ib. Breakinp-down or Cut . . . . ib. Breastsummer, Bressummer 42 Brick ib. Brickwork 44 Brick Trimmer 59 Bridire ib Bridging Joists 51 Bring-up ib. Building Act ib. Butment ib. Butt-joint. Abuttin,' ib. Cabinet 52 Cable Ib. Caisson lb. (Camber ib. Camber Beams ib. Cantilevers ib. Capital ib. Carcass of a Building ib. Carpentry ib Carry-up 59 Caryatides ..... lb. ( asting. Warpinjr ib. Cavetto ib. Caiilicoli ib. Celling ib. Ceiling-joists ib. Cement 60 Centering 62 Chimney ib. Cistern 63 u PAOB City 64 Clamp ib. Clear 65 Clear Story Windows ib. Clinkers ib. Closer ib. Closet ib. Coarse Siuff ib. Coat ib. Cockle Stairs ib Coffer ib. Coin ib. CoUarin. Collarino ib. Collar-beam ib. Colonnade ib. Column ib. Compartment Ceiling ib. Composite Order ib. Conxe ib. Cono-conic .\rch ib. C'lno-conic Groin ib. Conservatory ib. Console ib. Construction ib. Ciintinued ib. Contour G6 Coping ib. Cope-over i b. Coib.ils ib. Cordon ib. Core ib. Corinthian Order i h. Cornice ib. Corona ib. Corridore ib. Cortile ib. Cottage ib. Counter Fort ib. Counter Lath ib. Countersink ib. Country House ib. Coupled Columns ib. Course 67 Course ib. Court ib. Cousinet. — Cushion ib. Cove Bracketing ib. Coved and Flat Ceiling .... ib. Cover ib. Cover Way ib. Cradling ib. Cramp ib. Cross-grained Stuff ib. Cross-vaulting ib. Cro'.vn-post. Joggle -post. King-post ib. Cupola ib. Curb ib. Curb Plate ib. Curtain Step ib. Cylindrie Ceiling. Waggon- headed Ceiling ib. Cylindrie Groin ib. Cylindro-cylindric Arch . . ib. Cylindro-cp'indric Groin .. ib. Cylindro-spheric-Arch ....ib. Cylindro-spheric Groin .,,,ib. Cylindroldic Groin ib. Cyma Uecta .^...ib. Cyma Reversa ..,...»,o-. . 68 Cyma Taloa , ib. Deil ib. Decastyle ib. Decoration ib. Dentils ib. Design i^. De ails ib. I>' -sty'e '.'.'. ih. Die. ,b. ALPHABETICAL LIST. PAOB Die 68 Diminished Bar ib. Diminished Arches ib. Diminution ib. Dining Room ib. Dipteron ib. Discharge ib. Discbargin? Arches ib. Discharging Struts ib. Dishing-out ib. Disposition ib. Dog-legged Stairs ib. Dome 69 Door ib. Door Frame ib. Doric Order ib. Dormant, or DormerWindow ib. Dormitory ib. Double Fir Laths ib. Dove-tailing ib. Dragon Beam, or Piece ib. Drag. Dragging ib. Drawing, or Withdrawing Room ib. Dressing ib. Dressing Room ib. Drift. Ihrust. Shoot ib. Drip ib. Dripping Eaves ib. Drops ib. Droved Ashlar 70 Dwarf Walls ib. Eaves ib. Eaves Lath, or Board ib. Rchinus ib. Edging ib. Edifice ib. Elbows of a Window ib. Embossing ib. Embrasure ib. Engaged Columns ib. En>emble ... lb. Entablature ib. Entasis ib. Equi-a!titudinal Groin ....ib. Equi-angular Groin ib. Equi-Iateral Groin ib Eurythmy ib. Eustyle 71 Exchange ib. Extrados ib. Eye of a Volute ib. Fagade Face Mould Face of a Stone Facings False Roof Fascia Feather-edged Boards .... Fence Walls Fillet Filling-in-pieces Fine Stuff Finishing «. Fir-in-bond First Coat Flatting Floated Lath and Plaster set for Paper Floated Work Floating Floor Flooring Boards Flue Flush Flutings Flyf rs PAOB Foliage .,., 75 Footings ib. Foot-pace ib. Forum . ib. Foundation 76 Fox-tailed Wedging ib. Franking ib. Free Stuff. Frowy Stuff ib Frieze ib. Frieze-panel 77 Frieze-rail ii> Furrings ib Fut ib Gathering of the Wings ib Geometrical Stairs ib Girder ib. Glazing ib Ground-joists 78 Ground-niche ib. Ground-plate, or Sill ib. Grounds ib Grout ib. Half-space ib. Hall ib Halving ib. Hanging Stile ib. Headers . ib. Head-way ib. Heart-bond ib. Helix ib. H exastyle ib. Hick-joint Pointing ib. Hips 79 Hip-moulds ib. Hip-roof ib Holing ib Impost. Springing ib. Intercolumnialion ib. Intertie ib. Intrados ib Inverted Arch ib. Ionic Order ib. Jack Timber ib. Jack Rafters , Ib. Jack Ribs ib. Joggled Joint ib. Joggle Piece ib. Joinery ib. Joists ib. Key-stone King-post , Lap Lath floated and set fair Lath layed and set Lath plastered, set, and co- loured Lath pricked-up, flouted, and set for Paper Laying Light-house. Fanal. Pharos Lime Lime and Hair, CoarseS;u£f Lintel Lower Rail Lucarne, Luthorn, or Dor- mer Window Lying Panel ib. I Margin Margins, Marten .Masonry .Midide R^il ... Mitre PAGE Modillion, Modillion Cornice 82 Modiaature t'>. Mor ar S3 M uMiiigs :b. Moiihiings in. Mullion ib. Mu nio.i i'^. Mu.it. IIS. Moiitiiiits ib. Mutules- ib. Mutuie Cornice ib. Nakod Flooring ib. Naked of a Wall ib. Nave ib. Niche ib. Oak ib. Oclastyle ib. Off-set ib. Ogee ib Orders ib. Ord )iina-.ce ib. Oriameiits ib. Ovolo ib. Painting 84 Paving 85 Ptfde-tal ib. Pediment ib. Perip'eron ib. Peristyle ib. Pia/ja ib. Pier ib. Pilaster ib. Pitch ib. Plastering ib. Platband ib. Plate ib. Plinth ib Plumbery ib. Polvslyle 86 Por. h ib. j Portail ib. ' Portico ib. I Pon ib. ! Pricking up ib. i'liiic pal Kafiri ib. Prostyle ib. Pseudo-Jipteron ib. Pseudo-perip'eron 87 uggiiig ib. ALPHABETICAL LIST PAGE Punchton S7 Purline i ■• Push ib. Putty ib. rycnostylo ih. Quarters v> Quarteriiiif ih. tjuarier-roiind ib Quoius ib. Rafters ib. RaiU 8S Raising Plates. Wall Plates. Top Plates ib Random Courses ib. Rectangular Groin ib. Rendered and floated. — Floated, rendered, and set ib. Rendered, fioaied, and set ib R ndered and Set ib. Return ib Ridje ib. Risers ib. Roof ih. Hough cast ib. Hough rendering ib. Ri'unh Stuoco ii). Roughing-in ib. Rud^nture. Cable 89 Rules ib. Rustics ib. Rnstic Coins ib. Rustic Door ib. Sail- over ib. Scanll'.ng ib. Scotia ib Set fair ib. Set Work. Layed and set . . ib. Setting Coat ih. Sewer ib. Sifoot. Push. Thrust Jb. Skew Back ib. Skirs ib. Slating ih. Sleepers SO Somi lb. S»n-.mering ib. Spars. Common Raften .. ib. PAOE Spheric Oroin 9j •^pher'c v. ur =,,. Sph.^rocvlind io .-loiii .. jb taif.... .b" ■Stai'-s i.> St mche i ib. Si:,e it," St'C'cliers ib St.)ie 91 >trength <)2 Struts \ 93 Summer ii,_ Stuci-ii. Finishing ib. Stucco i Stud Work 94 Systyle ib. Tail ib. Temple jb. Templets 95 Te'rastyle ib. Through Stones ioi Tie ib! Tie Beams ib. Timber ib. looling jo.j Toothing ib. Toius ib. Transon Window )b Trimmers ib. Trimmer )b Trimming-joist ib Truncaed lioof ]04 Truss lb Truss Post ir). Tu-can Order ib. Tusk lb. Tusk Tenon ib. Valley ib Vault lb. Vestibule lb. Volute lb. V 'ussoirs. Voussors .... ib. Wall b Wall lb. VV:.l! PlatHS 105 Aater Table ib Window , , lb THE ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ViHAT ARCHITECTURE IS ; AND THE KNOWLEDGE REQUI- SITE TO AN ARCHITECT, Architecture is generally defined to be the art of building , but this definition does not carry with it a sufficiently positive and extended meaning. If the art of building be considered relative to architecture, it is nothing more than construction ; if it be considered relative to our wants, it appertains to all ages and to all countries : but the art of architecture, according to the etymology of the Greek w^ords apxv reKrovia, far from being common to all nations and to all ages, is confined to a few centuries, and only to a few privi- leged countries ; and ouo-ht to be defined the art of building according to certain rules and proportions, determined by natural causes and the perfected facul- ties of man. The art of building: is found amono;st all savage nations ; but the art of architecture can only be the result of society, enlightened by civilization and the other arts. Architecture is an art that requires great judgment and diversity of studies, to enable a person to form correct opinions of the works of others appertaining to it. Ir is acquired by theory and practice. 2 ARCHITECTURAL DI RECTOR. The theory of arcliittcture is that knowledge of it^ acquired by the study of the remains of antiquity, by the writings of the most learned authors, by travels, and by meditation. Ttu- «, practice, is the knowledge which is gained by the cxecutino' and conducting of buildings. The etymology of the word architect indicates that the person thus designated is the inspector and chief of those employed in the erection and completion of edifices ; and that he has the general direction of the works and of their execution ; which supposes a union of rare qualities and very extended knowledge. The knowledge Vitruvius required of an architect, shows the idea the ancients formed of architecture, and the dearee of esteem to which those might aspire who professed it. Pythius, one of the most celebrated architects of antiquity, required of an architect a more profound knowledge of each particular branch con- nected with the construction and decoration of edifices, than he considered necessary to him who exercised only one of these. But Vitruvius, more judicious, required only a medium knowledge of each. When we consider the time required for the study of architecture, the necessary expence incurred, the travelling and difficulties incident to the attaining of that degree of talent, which warrants the assumption of the title of architect ; how few resources does it present, to those who follow it as a profession, notwitli- standing that its utility doubtless ranks it, first amongst the Arts. Furnish a painter with a small piece of canvass, pencils, and a few colours, and if he be a talented artist, he will in a short time produce a painting of considerable value ; his fame and fortune ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 3^ resting entirely witliin the power of his pencil. But an architect is placed in a very ditTerent situation; his talent is obstructed and confined by a multiplicity of circumstances. His first business is to examine well the site of the intended edifice ; after this he forms his designs, which he studies, finishes, and then arranges the whole for execution. His attention is next directed to the quality of the materials that may be necessary, their judicious appropriation and value; as also the choice of workmen whose abilities he has to appreciate and direct ; and finally that his design when executed shall possess solidity, convenience, and beauty ; and which, generally, must be efiected by an economical application of resources. What are the gains of a talented architect, after his com- pletion of an edifice that shall be a credit to the age, and which shall have cost him so much exertion and care ? That portion of fame awarded to those who follow with talent and disinterestedness, the practice of the fine arts. More fortunate still if he can peace- ably enjoy this fame. Perhaps he is attacked by that envious calumniator, detraction ; his edifice is cri- ticised, and its cost exaggerated ; he is accused of having studied to enrich himself; whereas probably he has sacrificed his fortune to ensure his fame. Hence all confidence is destroyed, and his talents lie unsolicited and neglected. The same remarks will partly hold good as respects public works ; the designs that may be tendered, will perhaps be examined, commented upon and passed ; but when the final selection is made that is to deter- mine the design intended for execution, then it is that me man of talent is driven away to make room for 4 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the patronized. Hence arise those productions which are found so unworthy of being transmitted to posterity. Literary knowledge and history are much more useful to a modern, than they were to an ancient architect. Vitruvius required that an architect should be able to assign a satisfactory reason for the employ- ment of every architectural object, which his designs might present. How much more indispensable then are these studies at the present day, since by the adoption we have made, or rather ought to make, of the antique architecture, an architect finds himself perpetually necessitated to employ an infinity of parts or ornaments ; the common and parasite use of which can only become ridiculous, if not directed by a judi- cious and enlightened mind. The science of history, as it includes that of architecture, discloses the revo- lutions of an art which, more than any other, is linked to the destiny of the nations that employ it. In fol- lowing its origin, progress, and decadency, the student will distinguish the changes of taste, and varieties of style, adopted in different ages by different nations ; he will habituate himself to the discernment which the monuments of antiquity require, and the studies he ouo-ht to make from them. Drawing ought to fornt the basis of his education ; and some authors have insisted that no one can become a good architect without having a perfect knowledge of painting or sculpture. It is astonishing to contemplate how great a number of celebrated architects, who, to a proficiency in architecture, united a superiority in other arts, of which it is rare at the present day to attain eminence in one. But ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. O without going so far back as to the Greeks and Romans, do we not find this union of superior talents in individuals in the flourishing centuries of modern Italy ? Do not all the arts related to drawing, dispute the right to the renowned names that Fame has inscribed on the records of each? To make a just enumeration would be almost to except none. It was as rare at that time to profess but one art, as it is in our days to possess more than one. It would form too long a list to mention all the celebrated painters and sculptors who also possessed, to a very high degree, a knowledge and taste in architecture, and who have left posterity in doubt under which of the arts their names ought to be inscribed. Amongst them we read the names of Giotto, Orcagna, Mantegna, Michael Angelo, Rafl'aello, Giulio Romano, Polidoro, Vasari, Volterra, Pellegrini Tibaldi, Cigoli, Giovanni Bolognese, Domenichino, Cortona, Algardi, Bernini, and Carlo Maratti. Opposite to this list may be placed the gi-eat masters of architecture, who, to a knowledge of that art, united, in a more or less emi- nent degree, a practical knowledge of the other arts related to drawing ; at the head of which stand Brun- neleschi and Ammanati, who left more than one monument of their knowledge of sculpture ; Sanso- vino, Palladio, and San-Gallo, who were equally able sculptors ; Bramante, Vignola, Alberti, and many others, who exercised in turn the pencil and com- passes. In fine, it may be proved that there exist few beautiful architectural productions, which are not the result of a combined knowledge of the arts in those who were their authors. The reason of this union of talent in several arts, 6 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. formerly so common, but at the present day so rare in one individual, was, that in former times, one spirit presided over the arts, one chain connected them, and this common bond was, drawing, or a practical knowledge of natural proportions, which forms the base of architecture, sculpture, and painting. By consulting the memoirs of the lives of the celebrated artists of that early period, the truth of what is here advanced will be discovered ; namely, that their early education was the same, and that the most able architects formed themselves in the school of the most eminent painters. Modein institutions, in extending and rendering the mechanism of each art more diffi- cult, and in contracting genius within a limited circle, have not broken this fraternity, though at the present day it has no more than a name, and no longer exists but in the writings of those who treat on the subject. The arts at that time were really fraternal, and the artists formed a family that enjoyed and enriched themselves from a common patrimony. Instructed in the principles of all the arts, they passed indiffer- ently from one to another, or confined themselves to that with which their taste or circumstances rendered them most familiar; but always preserving the analo- gies which their first studies had tauoht them. It often happened that chance alone caused them to exercise an art in which they had not until then had any practice, and suddenly developed a talent, the acquisition of which at the present day seems to require the exertions of a whole life. " The cause of the facility which painters and sculptors have in learning architecture," says Yasari. " is that the one and the other, whether in tlie rela- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 7 tion of Statues to edifices, or the necessity of drawing and composing architecture in their paintings, are obliged to acquire a knowledge of this art, and to study the rules and proportions relative to it." But a more immediate relation unites the arts tooether — that of drawing ; and it may be easily perceived in what manner it necessarily applies to architecture. If the proportions given to this art were partly the result of those offered in nature, then he who habit- uated himself to the study of them in the book of nature itself, would make more correct applications of them, than they who are impelled by a mere prac- tical imitation of works and edifices, in which they are less sensibly imprinted. It is inexpressible how much this practice is useful to an architect, in the execution of drawings ; even independent of the great light which may be derived from the study of the other arts, for invention, correct expression of character, and resources of decoration. A knowledge of chiaroscuro effects of light, contrast of parts, and their accord or antipathy, furnishes him with all kinds of resources ; it shows him the faults, which a flat and mute manner of shading and colour- ing designs, will never' make him perceive ; which only discover themselves in the execution, when it is too late to remedy them. Professed architects have justly reproached some painters of having rendered the spirit of architecture unnatural in their edifices, by substituting decoration ; and of having made the resources of their art pre- dominant in the edifices. It is well known that for a long time painting and sculpture governed architec- lure, by which it lost its greatness and intrinsic 8 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR beauty : but this circumstance must be attributed to the bad taste reigning at that time in all the arts, to which indeed the painters materially contributed. If the edifices invented and conducted by the painters and sculptors of the flourishing centuries be examined, they will be found to exhibit the correct taste which reigned in their other works. It was not because Cortona and Boromini were painters, that they em- ployed licentious architecture, since Raflaello, Giulio Romano, and many other painters and sculptors, have left us models of the most regular and best reasoned architecture : but the one and the other applied to architecture the taste and style of the other arts which they professed, the principles of which, good or bad, according to the time, were common to architecture. But Avhatever may be the strength of these autho- rities, and the consequences that may be drawn from them, a union of the different arts cannot be made at the present day. For though nature has united them, and their common interests draw them together, yet the modern form of education and manner of study, tend to insulate and divide them. Timidity and weakness, the result of method so fatal to genius, makes the idea of re-uniting the sister arts chimerical; as they are separated by barriers which are become insurmountable. But if we can no longer require of an architect, with Vitruvius and Vasari, that he excel at the same time in painting and sculpture, at least ought not a theoretical knowledge of these arts to be required of him ? The art of drawing cannot be too much practised by him, whether it be for the figures which ought to ornament his designs, for ornaments ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. U of all kinds, the composition of which belongs only to him, or for the direction of the workmen and artists, to whom he ought to communicate his ideas, and transmit his taste and style. All the branches of knowledge hitherto enumerated, form but the accessories of the art ; but architecture, above all other things, requires discernment, and the talent of invention. What fineness of taste, what energy of mind does it demand ! The same feelings which animated Homer and Raffaello ought to have inspired Palladio, and must be possessed by every architect who aspires to appear in the first ranks of an art which is the base of all the others, and which first announces a degree of civilization, taste, and intelligence in a nation. The genius of an architect developes itself on contemplating the monuments of antiquity, which he ought to examine with reason and discernment ; and should endeavour to discover the few rules which they dictate ; for originally the rules were but few in number, though subsequently routine and precedent have greatly multiplied them. A student ought to commence early to invent and produce. As soon as he has acquired a general idea of architecture, a facility in drawing, and a know- ledge of the most beautiful models, antique and modern, he should apply himself to compose. Inven- tion, in architecture, is to produce from the imagina- tion an idea of an edifice which is not copied from any other already in being; and the invention will be good if the parts are distributed with order, proportion, and convenience ; if the ornaments are combined with correctness, elegance, and propriety ; if the edifice in its pa.rts and total be appropriate to its intended uses; c 10 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. and if it has the requisite solidity. To invent so that the designs may be executed without difficulty, and may obtain the approbation of persons instructed in the principles of the art, is that degree of knowledge in architecture at which he ought to aspire. But it is much more difficult to attain than is imasfined. Tlie eiforts and ambition of those who are destined for this art, cannot be too soon directed to this object: they too often lose the most precious of their years in copying the works of others — working through life on barren traces, without fruit and honour. IN WHAT ARCHITKC'I URE CONSISTS. Architecture consists in forming an edifice or building, so that it shall be solid, agreeable to the view, convenient, have all its parts in perfect relation to each other, and be of a convenable character, which is always determined by the uses for which it is destined. By a solid building is understood one which has all its parts bound with exactness, is of sufficient thick- ness to give them a proper consistence, and in which the footings, retreats, and necessary exterior inclina- tion, are not neglected ; so that the whole is fixed by an invariable equilibrium. But as a building that is merely solid will have riothinff ao^reeable to the view, or useful for the pur- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 11 pose to which it is destined, it is therefore necessary to produce beauty in the ordonnance, or proportion and decoration of the parts, and convenience in the distribution. A building which is convenient is one whose parts are such as its destination require ; and this destina- tion determines the number and situation of the apart- ments, stairs, passages, and communications ; which latter should be free and easy, each part showing its use and importance in the respective proportions, when compared one with the other. A well-proportioned building is one which in all the parts of its plan presents such harmony in its divisions, that each of its parts has evidently an essential relation to the others ; it is also necessary, in the elevations, that the heights should be adapted to the lengths, and that the apertures should be sup- ported by symmetrical and proportioned planes. The genius of the art consists in proportion. It requires the deepest study, with a correct taste. Thus, eurithmy, or proportion, is the agreeable relation of the parts to each other, and with the whole. From this accord, unity, and modulation, results the harmony of all the parts of an edifice, whether it be in the general division of the elevation, or in the interior and exterior decoration. Symmetry is the uniform correspondence of similar parts, which ought to be the same in number and disposition at each side of an edifice, in order that the whole may have an imposing appearance, and be easily understood. To eurithmy and symmetry belong unity, variety, order, simplicity, and the progression from the simplest 12 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. to the most ornamented. But architecture having necessity for its foundation, there results — Firstly, That its beauty ought to imprint this character of necessity : and the necessity of all its parts ought also to be apparent. Secondly : That the ornaments ought to be derived from the nature of the edifice itself, and result from the want which it might have of them. Hence to ascertain the merits of architectural com- positions, the following rule may be advantageously employed. Examine if each and every part separately and collectively unite to the greatest possible extent : a characteristic expression of beauty; convenience; and a real and apparent solidity. Whoever adopts these principles, which are founded on reason, will neither be imposed upon by authority, celebrity, nor custom. They will also observe the two following rules : — The first is of indispensable necessity in all kinds of buildings, and in each of their parts, and cannot be neglected without the risk of incurring censure ; such as false bearings, planes over apertures, shapeless and misplaced pediments, penetration of pilasters, bastard orders, different orders on the same plan or in projec- tion, as also the most solid placed under the most delicate, or the heaviest under the lightest, without their intermedials. These are necessary deductions, drawn from the true principals of beauty, propriety^ and solidity, which properties ought to be found in every building ; and not only exist, but be apparent. The second is useful or agreeable on certain occa- sions, and may be used when required, or according to circumstances. The relations of the dimensions in the orders are not of a precision that admit of no variation. What necessity is there, for example, that ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 13 the Ionic columns should be exactly nine diameters? and why the metopes perfectly square ? But as it before has been observed, it is only in cases of the greatest necessity that these licences should be taken; for care should be observed to give to them only a latitude of a certain circumference, and to endeavour to produce beauty by various means ; at the same time being attentive to those invariable principles and necessary rules, the transgression of which can only produce wanderings that will serve rather to shock our sight, than enlighten and conduct our reason. Justness of sight decides the second rule which may be omitted or modified, according to circum- stances, not only in the harmony of the dimensions, but in the choice and number of the ornaments, and the quality of the forms. Is there a reason for not applying the Doric frieze to the Corinthian order? Yes ; the delicacy of the one would be injured by the expression of strength in the ornaments of the other. The application of the above-mentioned rules relates to the principal ordonnance of the edifice, which is the form, proportion, and distribution of its parts, as also to the decoration of the whole and of its parts, interior as well as exterior. After an architect has formed a precise idea of the required conveniences of any edifice, it rests with him to design it in the best possible manner A sound judgment will enable him to determine, in aL cases, the particular expression of character which his edifice should assume ; how to dispose the accessories and adjacent objects; to overcome all obstacles by for- tunate inventions, according to the nature of the site; to give it a uniform and yet varied appearance, and 14 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. to prevent confusion in those parts where the different wants are found to be in opposition. To the arclii- tect also belongs, if the locality permit, the privilege of determining the extent of the edifice, and the number of its principal parts ; of giving them a suit- able size, according to the uses to which they are to be appropriated ; of afterwards distributing and re^- uniting them so as to form a whole, in such a manner that each part will be found placed where it is most suitable or convenient, and that the total will present interiorly and exteriorly, a convenient, solid, and beautiful edifice, analogous to its kind and destination. No one part ought to predominate to the detriment of another ; and while there is no appearance of excess, still nothing should be omitted that could be desired for its completion. It will thus manifest the genius of the artist ; and thus alone will it be beautiful in its details and total ; and so much the more so in pro- portion as the total and its parts present distinctly and at the first glance a free accordance, and a combination that agreeably fixes the sight. The appearance of such an edifice gives rise to an inexpressible pleasure and fascination in the beholder. It awakens in the mind exalted and enlarged ideas. The spectator feels those delightful emotions and agreeable transports which are excited by productions bearing real marKs of superiority of mind. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ON THE ORIGIN OF IIACH OF THE CONSTITUENT PARTS OF THE ANTIQUE ARCHITECTURE. Architecture, says M. Quatremere, did not com- mence to be an art in the countries into which it was introduced, till its inhabitants had attained a certain degree of civilization, opulence, and luxury. It was then that man, removing more from rustic labours and occupations, and seeking society in cities, endeavoured to substitute for the pleasures of nature, which were lost to his view, those of the arts, which are the imitators of nature. Before this epoch, architecture ought to rank only amongst the occupations necessary to the wants of life, which in those early days being very limited, its use was confined to making shelters from the inclemencies of the seasons. It was from these rude shelters, which varied in form in most countries, that those remarkable differences originated which we find impressed on the architecture of different nations. The first model, rude as it was, had in it certain characters which have never been lost sight of, and which may be traced in edifices of the highest gran- or tim])ers, placed horizontally upon each other ; the interior was then filled with earth and levelled. From this contrivance, pedestals, and continued base- ments, had their source. But as this elevation might become dangerous, and alter the solidity of the edifice, its height was stayed by spurs, which have since been adapted to walls of brick and stone. Thus also in the buttresses or water-breakers which defend the piers of stone bridges, and cut the current of the water, are seen the imitation of the stakes placed for the same effect in wood bridges, of which the famous bridge of Julius Caesar, upon the Rhine, gives us an example. In following the traces of imitation, many other details may be discovered, that carpentry has communicated to architecture. In order to preserve the doors and windows of the primitive simple huts from the dripping of rain, small projecting pieces were placed over them, in the manner of a shed, hanging aslope from the wall, or in the form of a small roof, so as to throw off the water either in front or on each side of the opening ; this was the model of the pediments and cornices, which have since ornamented doors, windows, and niches. The entrance of houses, above all, required such precautions : and these first inventions were continued in many coun- tries till they became metamorphosed by art. There may yet be seen in many places over doors, large projecting roofs, convenient for different uses, which suggested, according to the climate, the various methods of decoratins: the entrances to buildino^s. The horizontal and transverse joists have been the model for the compartments of ceilings, and all the ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. J^l accessories of soffits. In Italy the ordinary method of forming a ceiling proves the incontestability of this origin. There mio'ht be drawn from this unerrinor and fruitful principle, a number of other applications to the art of architecture, as in the variety of the proportions, the invention of the orders, the origin of the decora- tions, and a multitude of ornaments, such as flutings, grooves, foliage, leaves, &c. But it is unnecessary in this place to proceed further into the minute details of this subject, many of the applications made to orna- ments being mixed and equivocal ; and numbers of them, being the posterior inventions of pleasure rather than necessity, and not entering into the general system of architecture, ought to be excluded from this theory. It is sufficient to have proved that carpentry is the sole principle of the Grecian archi- tecture. It remain} now to be shown, that this imitation of the carpe itry of the primitive construc- tions of wood, is one of the principal sources of the pleasure produced by architecture, the spirit of which can be neither renounced, changed, nor misapplied, without affecting the laws of nature and verisimility. It is evident that of the two substances, stone and wood, which were employed, according to the different countries, in the first essays at constructing habitations for man ; that wood furnished for the art of imitation the greatest variety of modifications and resources ; and when stone was substituted for wood, the art, in preserving all the forms of the first sub- stance, enriched itself still more by the suggestions of the latter, and so united the qualities of both. It may be further remarked, that it owes to the other arts t32 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the combinations of proportion and beauty, the germ of which existed in carpentry. There are many persons who blame this imitation of the first constructions in wood; they dishke that stone should be the representative of another material, and complain of marble being thus degraded by taking an inferior character, and being made to assume the poor and miserable forms of the first wooden build- ings. They wish that the art should draw upon the properties of each substance for diversity of forms and taste. It has already been shown that in copying from stone itself, it has offered no pleasing forms to the art, no variety to the eye, no agreement to the mind. This is proved by the cold sameness, and tasteless elevations in the Egyptian architecture. But it would show little knowledge of the essence of the arts, the nature of their power on the imagi- nation, and the means by which they please, to take from architecture this agreeable fiction, and happiest of inventions ; to deprive it of this ingenious mask, which associates it to the other arts, permits it to appear on their theatre, and to rival them in useful- ness and excellence. By this happy delusion, man enjoys in architex^ture a most delectable pleasure. Divest it of the imita- tive art, which is its most pleasing charm, and that pleasure is lost to him. The habitual fictions of architecture are in part the cause of the pleasure this art procures him, by tlie imitation of the primitive carpentry, which is at once delusive and real. Even if it were proved that this imitation does not exist, and that it is only an ingenious system, the product of af^er invention ; yet all that can be drawn from this ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 33 proof is, that, though the early buildings were not so constructed, necessity demands that they should have been ; and this would be conceding to the art the merit of having created a model, the imitation of which would convey still greater pleasure, inasmuch as the supposed primitive constructions ought to ha\'e been its prototype. But it is not thus that things are invented : all the inventions of man are drawn from nature; and if this principle may be perceived even in those things, the traces of whose origin are lost, w^ould it not be absurd to refuse it to an art which has faithfully preserved the happy tradition of its origin, and all the titles of its genealogy? But what is this pretended imitation? demand some persons who would throw off the yoke of rules. Is it not a sophism — a theory founded on precedent and custom? Nature ought to be the basis of all imitation; but can the first rude essays in the art of building be ranked amongst its productions? Nature does not produce the columns, capitals, and entablatures of habitations ; all these, in their origin, are the product of an imperfect art: why then give the first rough sketches of the art as a model to it? If nothing in Nature presents a perfect type, the art can have no laws but what are imposed by itself; why then enslave it to those laws? It is, doubtless, well known, that this imitation is much less absolute in architecture than in the ( thcr arts, which model directly after Nature ; and it will shortiy be seen that it is not precisely in this way that architecture ranked amongst t!ie imitative arts, but by a law of imitation much superior to that which governs the others. Yet if this model is not in Nature, F 34 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. • as insisted upon above, she is nevertheless its author- for though not her work, it results from her laws ; if not produced, it was at least suggested by her. This art and nature are so united, that to renounce the one would be to reject the other. What is understood by the primitive wooden construction, which is asserted to be the model of architecture? And what is meant by the imitation ot it? It is not a servile copy which the art has adopted ; and though the period at which the model existed is distant, the tradition of it has been pre- served, and the imitation is so much superior, as to leave the model far behind. The trees cut in the manner of supports, have not been, nor could they ever have been, faithfully copied. The invention of the orders and proportions has greatly surpassed the first type ; indeed, to such a desfree, that to return to the type would be endeavouring to attain perfection by conforming to that which is not perfect in itself Thus, though this imitation of the first forms of the carpentry is an unquestionable tr th, and demon- strated by architecture, there may still be found those that will not be prevailed upon to admit it. Though, however they may refuse to acknowledge in the matter and form of the early buildings the original model of the art, the judgment which presides in its composition, in the principles of utility, propriety, order, and symmetry of disposition, are not the less manifest. If we could not prove that the primitive wooden construction had been materially copied, is it not evident that the simple and correct maxims which directed its fabrication exist in the principles of the art? Nature certainly did not form the early carpentry ; but ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. S)o it guided man in its formation by a principle which could not mislead him, and which caused him to transmit its impressions in his first rude essays. This piinciple is to architecture what an axiom is to a moral. But if it could be established, that this is only a fictitious data, and a sign of convention, what would it amount to? The principles on which the carpentry in question is constructed, are to architec- ture what fjo'ures are to mathematics ; and thoujrh this shell be abandoned, yet the principles on which it is established are so impregnable, that to attack them would be as idle as to combat a shadow, or to contend with a chimera. Those who have endeavoured to proscribe the imitation have succeeded only in cor- rupting it ; and have adopted, in spite of themselves, and without perceiving it, the laws they conceived they had rejected, but which it is impossible to renounce. They repulsed the rigour of its laws, which, by setting limits to fancy, are the happiest safeguards of the art. But in their vain innovations, what have they changed or effected, since they liave always preserved all the constituent parts of that which they reproved ? All they have effected has been to trans- pose the parts, or rather to discompose them. They have changed simple combinations into those that are complicated, natural order into fantastical disorder, symmetrical forms into irregular ones, proportions easy to be understood into others difficult and compound ; and yet they never could substitute other members for those of the early constructions. In these dis- organizing; proceedings it lias been their mistake to suppose, that to confound was improving ; to displace, inventing; and to innovate, making perfect. But 36 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. their efforts have proved, that a rude imitation of the laws of nature has the advantage over their unmean- ing inventions, and that the imitation of the carpentry, real or fictitious, cannot be abandoned, without renouncing the principles which it has demonstrated to be strictly correct, and abjuring the natural causes which prompted and imprinted them. Can tliose who make exceptions against the primi- tive carpentry, and reject its imitation, dispute the following maxims, which are manifested in its con- struction ; viz. That the strong; ouo^ht to bear the weak : The solidity ought to be real and apparent : The employment of all the parts ought to be justified by necessity: Unity and variety are constituents of beauty : Nothing is beautiful in architecture but what is useful, or serves some end : The parts ought to be subordinate to the total : Symmetry and regularity are inseparably connected with order and solidity : And that simple proportions are the most beautiful. To these might be added other rules resulting from the first essays of necessity, and the subsequent operations of the art. Whether the existence of the type in question be real or imaginary, it is certainly th2 theorem of all these truths : and who would proscribe its imitation, if it be a visible rule, and a material and evident example of the principles which constitute architecture ? The excellency of the imi- tation is clearly proved by the reality of the model, the necessity of the copy, the utility of its principles, and the pleasure man finds in it. The artist, unless ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ^7 he entirely change the model, ought rigorously to follow the rules and laws which it prescribes. It cannot be followed in certain parts and abandoned in others; obliged to be consequent in the imitation, it ought to be conformed to in all that it exacts, or be entirely renounced. It is only by placing the model before him, and tracing the object of his imitation, that he can hope to please. If he happen to lose sight of this rule of conduct, or pass an instant the bounds of an exact imitation, he may be seen falling by degrees into a disorder and confusion of ideas which render him the sport of the most extravagant and false combinations. No more clear and precise ideas present themselves ; all is unnatural : the forms are continually changing ; the signs of which alone remain, and become at last unintelligible. The columns are no longer the natural supports which the proportions between them, and that which they have to sustain, ought to make apparent ; they become objects that might be dispensed with, the frivolous accessories of a needless ostentation, of which the disposition appears no longer to appertain to archi- tecture. The entablatures are no more the represen- tation of the parts which compose the roof, but are broken and turned in a thousand ways ; the pediments also cease to represent the gables of the roofs ; straight lines are succeeded by curved surfaces of all descriptions; and the plans of edifices being perverted, unity, regularity, and proportion no longer exist. All the unskilful forms that the pencil can produce are realized in durable substances, and the strength and skill of workmen are prostituted to a warped imagi- nation. The ornaments absorbing the members, and 38 ARCHITECrrxAL DIRECTOR. the accessories e'jminanding the principal, there can be no law between the parts, nor correspondence between tliem and the total ; and the construction itself must disappear under this profusion of licentious decoration. From this destruction of the principles of architecture, and introduction of confusion into it, the art would become a puerile exercise for the artists, and an enigma for the generality of mankind. On the contrary, the edifices, both ancient and modern, that possess the most general and least contested reputation for beauty, are those in which this scrupulous imitation of the primitive type has been most carefully observed. The esteem in which they are held depends on the degree in which the principles of the model have been applied. There remains in France, says Laugier, a most beautiful monument of the ancients ; this is what is called at Nismes the Maison quarre. The beauty of this edifice is admired, not only by the connoisseur, but by those also who are ignorant of the rules of the art. Why ? Because the whole of it is according to the principles of the early constructions. A prolonged square, where thirty columns support an entabla- ture, and the roof terminated at the two extremities by a pediment, are all that it presents; exhibiting a degree of simplicity and nobleness that strikes all beholders. In thus retracing the history of architecture to that point of which we have just been speaking, we have discovered only the crude types which constitute, as it were, the skeleton of the art. I'he concurrence of other arts, more direct imitators of nature, was neces- sary to bring architecture from the point where it ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTO; . 39 vvonUl have rested witiiout them, to that degree of perfection in which it was found among the ancients, i^efore this necessary junction with the arts, architec- ture resembled the celebrated statue formed by Prometheus, that waited only the torch of Minerva to communicate to it movement and life. Jt was from this union that it received animation, and was made to participate in those riches which the arts had de- rived from their common imitation of nature. In the appropriation, however, of these riches, and the choice and comparison of these new models, of which archi- tecture previous to that time was entirely ignorant, considerable knowledge and judgment was required. Restrained to the forms commanded by necessity, it followed only the rude proportions that its limited knowledge enabled it to perceive. It could not, however, rest at this point amongst the Greeks, as it lias done with many nations where it is yet in its infancy. Greece, fertile in genius, could not be an unfruitful soil for any art. Blessed with a mild and beautiful climate, and enjoying political and civil institutions the most favourable to genius, sculpture was marching at a slow but sure pace, having followed a route until then unknown. Raising itself by degrees from the most shapeless signs to the principal dimensions in the termes, from the termes or iierma^ to the figures called dedales, it at length attained a tolerably accurate knowled2:e of the true proportions of the body of man, in the imitation of which architecture discovered, if not a fresh model, at least a new analofry of imitation. In the applica- tion of this system of natural })roportions and relations, a similitude of principles was discovered, 'by the 40 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. appropriations of which the art became more imme- diately the adopted of nature, and enlarged its capf- biJities of effective design. In the formation and imitation of types, architecture knew only the simple dimensions of necessity. In its progress towards perfection, a model of proportions applicable and conformable to its first disposition became necessary, which, without contradicting the spirit of its original, would embellish the form. The application of human proportions was eminently cal- culated to answer this piu'pose : it afforded such means of perfecting the first essays of the sketch, that one is almost tempted to regard the excellence which followed, as the result of previous computation and reflection, rather than the concurrence of successive and unforeseen causes. Nevertheless, experience proves that the principal inventions of men are the result of a fortunate application of fortuitous disco- veries. To this imperceptible conjunction of cau.^es, which were beyond the reach of human foresight, and which determined, in a great measure, the destiny of the arts, architecture was subordinated more than any other art. In adverting, however, to the commence- ment of the arts amongst the Greeks, it may be remarked of them generally, that they contained in themselves the seeds of perfection ; nor is it easy to discover any cause that could have operated to prevent them from arriving at maturity. The rude representations of Thespis were preludes to the master-pieces of Sophocles ; and the architecture of Greece, unlike that of modern nations, which received from the Gothic a vicious principle, advanced from its origin, urmiarked by vacillation, and without retro- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 41 grading in that course which naturally led to per- fection. Architecture, constituted and founded upon the types of carpentry, offered to the art of imitation a fertile field, which required but more favourable circumstances, and a more fortunate cultivation. The art of proportions ought to perfect the work. The ancients were sensible that the forms of the carpentry could be improved by bringing them to points of comparison of another kind. Estimating the form of man as the most perfect in nature, they perceived that in imitating the plan, disposition, conformity, and the means that nature had employed in its most perfect work, the art would, in some measure, become its rival. Believing they had discovered the secret by which nature pleases, and from whence she derives her beauty, they conceived that an edifice disposed after the same spirit and principle that nature itself had pursued, would be alike beautiful, and please from the same reasons. Thence an edifice was regarded as a form which ought to have its members, divisions, and parts subordinate to the total. Observ- ing that nature has disposed the form of man in such a manner, that there exist a necessary correlativeness from the smallest part of his body to the whole, they would not from that time admit in architecture any thing which could not, as in nature, be justified by a necessary employment, or was not dependent on the general order. [t was on this plan that all the forms invented by necessity were put in order, and consecrated by the imitation of types, the employment of which had not as yet found a basis in reason and enlightened senti- o 42 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ment. Hence that happy division into three paits, that ternary distinction, which may be remarked "n the form of the original model, was afterwards founded upon nature itself, in the works of which this same division is generally adopted. Architecture, says M, D'Hencarville, is composed of three parts ; the column, entablature, and pediment, to which a basement has since been added. Each of these parts are subdivided into three others. The reason of this division is, that it contains the greatest number of proportions that the eye of man can embrace at once, and may observe with attention, without being fatigued. Nature has given to sculpture a determined measure of relations, a scale of proportions of the human form, which, whether it be taken from the foot or the head, will serve as a module to the whole figure : it rules the slightest shades of proportions, in establishing a constant accord of the parts, independent of the variety of the models, and the errors of the sight. Architecture also has created for itself a scale of proportions of a similar nature, which in the different ordonnances, was the inferior diameter of the columns of the order employed. From that time an edifice became a kind of organized object, subordinate to constant laws, in which it found the principle and reason. It made a code of proportions which assigned to each part its measure and ratio, according to the design of the total ; connecting in such a manner the whole with the part, and the part with the whole, that it placed them in a reciprocal dependance, and secured to them an inviolable accord. The study of the human form having been investigated in all its ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 43 varieties, caused sculpture to perceive the differences of age and nature, which form the diverse manners that Polycletus has described in his treatise of sym- metry, and of which the antique statues have preserved to us the visible rules. Architecture has formed for itself a similar expression of character in the invention of the orders, which are reduced to these three : the one expresses strength, the other elegance, and by the union of these two qualities, the third exhibits the expression of nobleness and majesty. Such was the progressive advance of architecture. It was in assimilating itself to another model, that it succeeded in producing one much more perfect than the first It is useless to remark that it never traces materially upon the model of the human form, but only makes an intellectual copy. The imitation is not posi- tive, but figurative. It is not the form that architecture appropriates, but the proportions and principles that are contained therein. When Vitruvius tells us that the Doric order was made in imitation of the body of man, and the Ionic in that of a woman, it must be understood that this vvas an imitation of analogy, and not of resemblance. Hence he gives us to understand, that in one was imitated the neglected and naked simplicity of the body of man, and in the other the delicacy and ornaments of that of woman. But when he endeavours to establish a similitude between the column without base and the naked foot of man ; between the ornamental base of the Ionic, and the elegant sandals of women ; between the folds of their dress, the ringlets of their hair, and their bracelets, and the Ionic volutes and flutings, the comparison is pursued too far. It becomes an abuse of analogy 44 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. that banishes reason, or at most an ingenious allegory, intended to disguise truth, but which tends rather to alter and render it unnatural. Others, reversing this order of imitation, have pretended to see in the capital of a column, the head of a man, and his body in the shaft ; and have attempted by a fictitious and absurd interpretation to prove the truth of their hypothesis. It is evident that man, in seeking a model of proportions to apply to the rude delineations of carpentry, could not possibly have found one more sensible, or more within his power, more analogous or happy than the human form. This analogy is so natural, that in praising the human figure, it is generally compared to a well-eauty so much admired in his productions, and which has L 74 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. raised his work on the orders of architecture, into universal repute. The basilica di Vicenza, houses Tiene, Trissino, de Porti, and Valraarana, at Vicenza ; Foscari house, monastery de' Canonici della Carita, refectory de' Monaci di St. Giorgio Maggiore, churches di St. Giorgio Maggiore, St. Francesco della Vigna, II Re- dentore, Olimpico theatre, and many other edifices at Venice, were constructed by Palladio. It appears to have been his object, to shew that the principles of beauty and design exhibited in the antique edifices, are suitable to all periods and to all European coim- tries, with the modifications that the ancients them- selves have admitted in their works. From his manner of imitating them, he seems to have had no other system than that of making such a judicious application of their principles, as they themselves would have made had they exercised their art amongst the moderns. Thence the free, easy, and elegant application of the masses, lines, plans, and ornaments of the antique in all his constructions. The style of Palladio has been imitated in England by Inigo Jones, Wren, Gibbs, Chambers, and many others, who have modified his plans, fa9ades, adjustment of his forms, profies, ordonnances, and details. The Pitti palace, at Florence; houses Ruspoli, Sacripanti, Negroni, and Romano college, at Rome, by Bartolomeo Ammanati. His works are admired for the judicious ordonnance of their details, beauty of their forms, disposition of the planes, apertures, profiles, and the harmony of the parts with the total. The chapel del Presepio in St. Maria Maggiore, villa Negroni, Vaticana library, facade of St. Gio. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 75 Laterano, palaces Vaticano, elevation facing the city, and Albani, at Rome, by Domenico Fontana. This artist cannot be considered amongst those masters of the art whose works are classic. In his edifices a great knowledge of construction is developed, and a taste which, without being absolutely pure, wanted neither simplicity nor greatness. The college della Sapienza, churches del Gesu, St. Luigi de' Francesi, St. Maria in Via, Madonna de' Monti, St. Paolo alle tre Fontane, and de' Greci, at Rome, by Giacomo della Porta. The architecture of his churches presents a great number of projections, pediments above each other, and other similar extra- vagances. In his mansions the style of this architect is very unequal. Some are passable, such as the Sapienza, and the houses Gottofredi, Nicolini, and the Belvedere at the villa Aldobrandini ; others again abound with the ordinary abuse that he made of pediments, projections, mezzaninas, &c. as the houses Marescotti and Serluppi. That of Chigi has a majestic vestibuivi, and a spacious and commodious court. There are many fountains designed by this architect, which are situated in the squares Navona, Colonna, Popolo, Rotonda, Campidoglio, and Madomia de Monti. The best are, that in the Piazza Mattei, and another in the Campidoglio, where the statue of Marforio is placed. '^I' he houses Cornaro, Trissino, Molini, Pisani, Strozzi Ravaschieri, Fino in Bergomo, and many others at Vicenza, Venice, Florence, Padua, and Genoa, by Vincenzo Scammozzi. It is easy to perceive that his style is formed from that of Palladio, but it is repro- duced by this learned author with great discernment and purity. 76 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. It was in this century, during which England, France, and Germany, were a prey to religious wars, that ten pontiffs, in succession, contributed to the erection of St. Peter's church, at Rome. (^See the Frontispiece, and pi. 71 to 74 ; in which the defects exhibited in the details of the original, are omitted, and the whole modified.) This celebrated edifice was erected on the site of that which was built by Constaatine, and which, from the plans that remain, appears to have been divided into five parts, by a hundred Corinthian columns ; and presented two isles at each side of the nave. Its entrance consisted of a large square area formed by a colonnade. Pope Nicola V. finding it in a most dilapidated state, formed the idea of erecting another church, that should surpass the former in magnificence. He con- fided the important trust to Leon Battista Alberti and Bernardo Rosellini. The first-mentioned architect wishing to prepare for the execution of this great enterprise, first constructed a spacious apsis at the extremity of the site of the former : and for this pur- pose he demolished the temple of Probus, which was situated near it. The work, however, was not raised more than three cubits in height when Alberti died. In a short time afterwards Nicola V. died, without having enjoyed the satis^faction of seeing the designs of Alberti executed; and one of his successors, Giulio II., laid the first stone of this edifice. After having employed the most able architects in Italy to furnish designs for the intended church, the preference was given to those offered by Bramante ; notwithstanding Michel Angelo Bonarroti, who had lately arrived in Rome, openly condemned them. To accelerate the construe- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 77 tion of this new church, Bramante demolished the materials of the former church, together with the columns; the latter, Michel Angelo asserted might have been preserved and employed. Nevertheless Bramante raised the edifice in a short time to the entablature of the principal pillars. Leone X. successor to Giulio H., gave all his atten- tion to this new undertaking. He confided it to the care of Giuliano da Sangallo, Fra Giocondo Veronese, and the celebrated Raphaello, who had studied archi- tecture under Bramante. Already this pontiff despaired of seeing the entire execution of the designs of Bra- mante, when Baldassare Peruzzi advised him to make several alterations in the project; this architect stating that the plan of Bramante was defective in its solidity. In his alterations, he preserved the great cupola, but gave the edifice a square form instead of a rectangular one, which was the form Bramante had assisrned it. About this period, namely, 1521, Leone X. died. Adriano VI. only survived him a year: the troubles with which the pontificate of Clemente VII. was dis- quieted, did not permit him to forward the execution of this edifice. Paolo III. testified his taste by the embellishments which the capital of his states re- ceived ; and showed much zeal for the construction of the new church. After the death of Peruzzi, Antonio Sangallo made a new project and model, which were agreed to by Paolo III. In this plan, which was more extended than that of Peruzzi, he totally perverted the designs of Bramante. Sangallo dying in 1546, the pontiff was for some time undecided to whom it should be intrusted At length Paolo III. appointed Michel Angelo to be the architect of St. Peter's, with 78 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. full power to make such alterations in what was already built, as he might judge necessary ; and to be guided solely by his own judgment in prosecuting the remainder of the design. Michel Angelo altered the plan of this church to that of Peruzzi ; namely, a cross, with its four ex- tremities of an equal length, in the centre of which are placed four piers to support the cupola. He suppressed a great portion of the beauties exhibited in the designs of Bramante and Peruzzi, and augmented the dimensions of the different parts, without increas- ing the solidity in an equal ratio. He had not super- intended the construction of this edifice more than three years, when Paolo III. expired. Giulio III. succeeding him,- continued to Michel Angelo the trust. Shortly afterwards Giulo III. died ; and the pontificate of Marcello II., w^ho succeeded him, was of still shorter duration. Paolo IV. was elected to the pontificate, at which time Michel Angelo was studying the con- struction of the cupola. The model was finished, but its execution was retarded by the death of Paolo IV. This pontiff was succeeded by Pio IV., who continued the trust to Michel Ano:elo. The church of St. Peter's was raised to the height of the spring of the cupola, when Michel Angelo died, in 1564; when he had superintended the erection of this edifice seventeen years. Some time before his death, he caused a detailed model to be made in wood, to which he affixed the drawings and specifi- cations. After his death Pope Pio IV. appointed Pirro Ligorio, and Giacomo Barozzi, known by the name of Vignola, to succeed Michel Angelo ; and he enjoined them to follow with exactness the project of ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 79 their predecessor. It was an opinion so generally entertained that no additional improvement could be made in the model of Michel Angelo, that at the expiration of two years, Pio V. dismissed Ligorio for having departed from it. Vignola alone remained, and occupied himself for the rest of his life in execut- ing the exterior accordino' to the desions of Michel Anofelo. After the death of this architect, which took place in 1579, Gregorio XIII. deputed in his place, Giacomo della Porta, who had been the pupil of Vignola. This pontiff did not continue the con- struction of the cupola, but preferred terminating the decoration of the interior parts of the church. Sisto V. having succeeded Gregorio XIII., wished to have the reputation of erecting the celebrated cupola de- signed by Michel Angelo. Besides Giacomo della Porta, he engaged Domenico Fontana, whose talents had been proved on several occasions. They com- menced to work at the attic of the great cupola, on the fifteenth of July, 1588. Sisto V. being anxious to finish this cupola, employed six hundred work- men, who relieved each other, so as to work night and day without intermission. The undertaking was forwarded with such ardour, that in a year and ten months, the attic and two cupolas were completed to the basement of the lantern. The pontiff gave solemn thanks over the last stone, which was laid the fourteenth of May, 1590; the cannon of the castle of St. Angelo announcing the circumstance. He caused the exterior of the cupola to be covered with lead, and decorated the seven projecting sides in face of the entrance with gilt bronze. Notwithstanding the celerity with which Sisto V. caused this work to be 80 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. erected, he had not the satisfaction of seeing it com- pleted; for he died in the month of August, 1590; and the lantern, globe, and cross were not completed before November in the same year, under Urbano VII. The rest of the parts were executed by Gia- como della Porta, in the pontificate of Clemente VIH. Afterwards Paolo V. caused the church to be length- ened after the designs of Carlo Maderno; but he constructed the facade from those of Michel Angelo. All the different works were completed in 1614. Urbano VIII., Innocentio X., Alessandro VII., and several other pontiffs, enriched this temple with chapels, sepulchral monuments, and other embellish- ments; which were executed after the designs of the most celebrated artists of Italy. The merits of this great work are exhibited, in the plan previous to its alteration : in the employment of only one order, and in the tambour of the dome ; which are beauties that compensate for a portion of the following defects presented in this edifice. In the interior: the projection of the imposts ex- ceeds that of the pilastres; the continuity of the principal entablature is interrupted by numerous breaks ; and the ornaments with which the whole of the interior is decorated, are too abundant to be effective, and not in a correct style. At the exterior : first, in its plan, by the distribu- tion of its entrance, as also by the massives placed in the exterior of the circular parts of the three principal branches ; secondly, in the elevations, by an erroneous application of pilastres, as also the numerous breaks in the entablature over them ; by the ordonnance of its facade, which, although possessing the advantage ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 81 of presenting only one order, produces but little relief to the elevation, from the circumstance of its columns being engaged in the masonry ; and the disproportion of the members of the entablature, which is said to have arisen from the extraordinary module of the columns. Lastly, the attic is too high ; added to which, the employment of windows in the same, together with their defective form, and decoration ; as also the decoration of the lantern of the dome. The bad effects which result from Maderno adding three arcades in length to the western extremity of St. Peter's, which from a Greek became a Latin cross, are : first, that it no longer presents the spec- tator with a point of sight from whence any portion of the tambour of the great dome can be discovered ; not even from the extremity of the immense area fronting the church ; so that the most beautiful parts of this edifice remain concealed : secondly, the interior of the church is entered, under the expectation of enjoying the effect of the grand cupola, of which so much has been said, and which expectation is in a great measure disappointed. For the spectator, per- ceiving only a curved aperture in the vaulted ceiling, is obliged to advance a considerable distance before he obtains a perfect view of this rotundo, which ought to present itself from all points. There have been a multitude of embellishments successively added to the interior of this temple, which, however, from the profuse gilding, the stuc- coes of the arches, and the walls being covered with different kinds of marble, have not merely destroyed the harmony, but have lessened, very materially, the general effect. Nevertheless tlie faults and errors M 82 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. which are met with in so great an undertaking, ought not to excite astonishment, when it is considered tliat its construction was the work of three centuries, carried on under the direction of different individuals, several of whom made considerable innovations in the simplicity of the original design. A mixture of beauty and deformity, of greatness as well as littleness of design, might naturally be expected to result from the amalgamation of so many grades of genius and talent in the erection of one edifice. It cannot be denied, that no church has yet been erected, the area of which is equal in extent to that of St. Peter's ; yet it by no means exhibits that apparent magnitude which a spectator, previous to entering it, expects to witness; and it is often matter of dispute whether it is equal in extent to the cathedral at Milan, or even St. Paul's at Rome. It is however sufficient to state, that the principal nave of St. Peter's is 610 feet in length, and the transverse 457 feet ; and that the total length of the basilic of St. Paul at Rome is scarcely 267 feet. Nevertheless, St. Paul's appears to be of greater extent than St. Peter's. Place two ranges of insulated columns in the interior of the latter, as is the case with the former, and you will immediately discover St. Peter's to be the most spacious church in the world. The employment of insulated columns in an edifice increases its apparent extent ; they fill up the vacancy of an extensive area, and form a lengthened perspective, by furnishing the eye with objects on winch it can rest, and from which the mind is enabled to form an estimate of the extent of space which they occupy, whicli is apparently increased by their number; Tliis deme»"''t of St. Peter's is derived from modern ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 83 architecture, which, having proscribed the forms of the ancient basihcae and Hnes of insulated columns, employed only pillars and massives ; which producing but little effect, present heavy and monotonous struc- tures. At the commencement of this century, celebrated for the prosperity of trie arts and hence the cultivation of a correct taste, archi-;€ cture exhibited a very promising display of genius and talent at Rome. Bramante and Sangallo treated architectural decoration with the reserve which a study of the antique remains, as yet little known, inspired. Peruzzi, Raphaello, and Vig- nola, advanced with more liberty, and greater intelli- gence : thus the proportions of the orders were more correctly delineated ; the beauty of insulated columns was discovered ; the use of arches placed upon the capitals of columns was condemned ; a great variety of forms for churches and palaces was introduced, and their distribution enlarged ; presenting at this period real and important advantages to architecture. These benefits and this progress were increased by the translation of the work of Vitruvius, and the commentaries made by Alberti, Serlio, Vignola, Palla- dio, Scamozzi, and many other professors of architec- ture. Every thing appeared favourable for the establishment of a correct architectural taste, and the opportunity seemed at hand to give permanency to whatever was excellent in the art ; \vhen Michel Angelo appeared, wlio, with the capricious sublimity of his genius, oveithrew all and introduced the most fantastic forms. lie prescribed to and governed Fontana, Porta, Ammanati, and a multitude of others ; corrupted the taste of this century, and influenced that 84 ARCHITECTURAr. DIRECTOR. of the following by the evil of his example. The abuses which he introduced, or that he and his parti- zans raised into credit, are, niched and coupled columns, together with others supporting little or nothing. A repetition of the same order in several stories. Those of different heights and species in the same story; a single order which embraces several stories, others without character, or again mingled with different characters. An injudicious application of pedestals and pilasters of various kinds, and some even reversed, being larger at the upper extremity than the lower. An absence of proportion ; capricious profiles ; and a superfluity of mouldings; together with a profusion of insignificant ornaments. Pediments of different descriptions employed without discrimination, both in the interior and exterior. The application of entablatures to irregular plans, as also oflfering a con- tinued series of breaks. And lastly, churches with facades, presenting two stones, and interiorly encum- bered with heavy pillars instead of columns, which form one of the greatest beauties of architecture. The architecture of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries adopted many of these imperfections ; so that a detailed description of their edifices would be tedious. A chronological list of those which are most deserving of notice will suffice. The chapel Paolina in St. Maria Maggiore, Basilic di St. Sebastiano fuori le mura, and Sciarra Colonna palace, by Flaminio Ponzio. In the last-mentioned production, the fine division of the different stories, the judicious and noble proportioned distances of the apertures, a reasonable employment and distribution of ornaments, at once simple and majestic, are generally admired. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 85 At this period the system of the antique architec- ture was introduced into England by Inigo Jones. It had been introduced into France during the preceding century by Serlio, Primaticcio, and Pierre Lescot, in the construction of the Louvre and other edifices. In the year 1620, Inigo Jones was charged with the repairing of St. Paul's cathedral, at London. This old Gothic church was falling into decay in many places. Our architect erected a portico of the Corin- thian order at each side of the Gothic frontispiece that he repaired. We find amongst his works the plan and elevation of one of these porticoes (that of the western side), which construction disappeared with that of the ancient cathedral, at the time of its re-construction by Sir Christopher Wren. We are obliged to acknowledge the justice of the critique that has been passed on the style employed in these addi- tions. Nothino' is so unbecomino: in the restorations which are obliged to be made in Gothic edifices, as this medley of different styles, and above all of antique ordonnances, the system of which is totally different, and can produce no other effect than that of a contra- diction, which offends the sight as much as the understanding. Inigo Jones was afterwards charged with the construction of the great enterprise of the royal palace at Whitehall, the designs for which he nad commenced and finished in the reijjn of James I. It is from this production that we are best enabled to judge of the genius of our architect. It may be affirmed, that a greater or more magnificent ensemble of a palace was never conceived and projected by any modern architect; and if the disasters of the period had not interrupted its execution, London might have 86 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. boasted of possessing the most magnificent palace in Europe. Unhappily, it is but in his designs that we can form an idea of its merits. The combination of variety and regularity, of greatness and simplicity, exhibited in the plan of this immense edifice, which was intended to form a perfect quadrangle, are truly admirable. The space occupied by this plan is divided into three equal parts. That in the centre is a spacious court? which traverses the whole of the palace : the other two are each composed of three courts, environed by buildings, the masses of which correspond in their general appearance. The elevation of this total offers the most perfect symmetry in its four exterior facades, each of which is formed of masses of buildings, of which the dispositions and ordonnances are balanced by a general, uniform, and always greatly varied motive, either by the advance or retreat of the parts, or by the diversity of the elevations. Each fa9ade is similar to the other exteriorly. The interior of the palace presents in its different elevations, details which seem to present all the variety that good taste could unite. To gain a more precise idea of this design, it will be necessary to examine the works of Inigo Jones, published by Kent in 1770, where the beautiful details of this great enterprise are engraved. It is in these designs that we may discover how much Inigo Jones appropriated the style of Palladio. Every part of this immense composition brings to mind, in the em- ployment of the orders, porticoes, bossages, basements, profiles, details, form of the windows, doors, &c. that rich and simple, noble and elegant style, that Palladio and the architects in Italy of the (sixteenth century, ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. O . applied in the palaces of the great, and also in the dwellings of private individuals. We may be convinced by that beautiful fragment of Whitehall palace, named the banqueting-house, with what ability Inigo Jones appropriated the beauties of the great masters from whom he copied. It is composed of a very high rustic basement, on which rise two stories, each of which has seven vvindow.5. The height of each story is occupied by an odonnance of columns and pilasters; the lower are Ionic, and those above Composite. The whole is surmotinted by an attic and balustrade. Some of the details in this ensemble give rise to criticism. It woi.ld be better if the cornice was not in projection over the engaged columns and pilasters. It is also to be wished that Inigo Jones had not followed the bad practice of a swelled or cur\ ed frize in the entab- lature of his Ionic order. Notwithstanding these little irregularities, the aspect of tliis edifice is rich, and exhibits a nobleness of character. The windows have elegant architraves ; the execution is pure and choice ; and a person of adequate judgment acknow- ledges at once tlie .style of a Palladio. The church of St. Paul, Covent Garden, is mentioned as being; constructed from the desio:ns of Iniiio Jones. This edifice presents a portico of columns, of what is called the Tu.scan order ; which is of great sinijdicity. It cannot be denied that this mass bears a sufficiently serious character, yet neither the interior nor exterior is distinguished by any merit either of composition or execution. • The Royal Exchange, at Lojidon, built after ♦.ho great I. re in this city, is also said by some to have 88 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. been erected from the designs of this artist ; though others attribute both the design and execution to Sir Ciiristopher Wren ; but if it be the design of Inigo Jones, it is considered at the same time as not beina: one of his best productions. This edifice has an arcade in the centre of its facade, accompanied by a smaller one on each side, the latter extending round the front and lateral elevation forming a piazza, the whole of which is decorated with the Corinthian order. It is from the middle of this part of the Exchange that a lofty tower is raised, ornamented with the Ionic, Corinthian, and Composite orders. The superior part of the structure is terminated by a balustrade and ornamented with statues. The large arcade in the centre of the two elevations, serves as entrances to a noble area, in which the merchants assemble ; and is surrounded by a piazza, that serves as a convenient shelter from the sun and rain. A staircase in the north and another in the south front, communicates with a gallery on the second story, which runs round the whole building, and leads to various offices occupied by underwriters and merchants. One of the greatest and most remarkable edifices in England is Greenwich Hospital, situated on the south bank of the Thames, at the distance of five miles from London bridge. It was designed by Inigo Jones, and completed from his projects by Webb, his pupil. Tliis immense total of buildings, which at the present day serves as an hospital for invalid seamen, was originally destined for another purpose. Inigo Jones had pro- jected it for a palace for Charles I. It appears that he had but completed a part of this vast construction, when its continuation was interrupted by political ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOll. SU circumstances. It remained in this state until ^\'illiam in. resolved to grant the land and buildings intended for a royal palace, for the establishment of an hospital for invalid seamen ; and accordingly the part executed by Inigo Jones was accompanied with the corres- ponding parts and buildings which constitute the whole of the present plan. It cannot be affirmed that all the parts of this edifice are executed accord- ing to the original designs of our architect, since the change of its destination would necessarily require particular disposition. The present ensemble is com- posed of two spacious square masses of buildings, situated on an extensive terrace, on the south bank of the Thames. Each of these buildings, which are perfectly symmetrical, has a court in its centre. Their anterior and posterior facades are formed of a basement, upon which the Corintliian order is placed, tliat occupies the height of the two stories ; an attic, surmounted with a balustrade, crowns this ordonnance. Two parts in advance, with four engaged columns supporting a pediment, are disposed in the facade at eacli side of the entrance, flanked with coupled pilas- ters, corresponding with others at (he angles, which are also coupled. These pilasters accord with four others in return, which terminate the ordonnance and delineate the dimensions of the facade. The two anterior and posterior elevations just mentioned, are united at each sitle by a mass of building less elevated, by the height of the attic, and perforated in each of the two stories with windows cut in the bossages, which give to these wings a very masculine character. The centre is occupied by four columns in advance, similar to those of the facade. As the whole of this 90 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ensemble is composed of two parts perfectly symme- trical, the description of one, as above, will serve to convey a just idea of the other. The grand area or esplanade which separates the two above-mentioned buildings, discovers two domes of considerable elevation, which rise over insulated porticoes. These domes terminate a long range of buildings at each side, evidently of a style posterior to Inigo Jones. The whole ends in an avenue, which leads by a slight ascent to the royal observatory. From a view of all the parts of which this great edifice is composed, it becomes evident that it is the work of different times and successive artists. The style of Inigo Jones is only found in that part of the edilice of which a more special description has been given, and in which the style of Palladio is evident, particularly in the bossaged wings before-mentioned. Criticism would find somethino; still further to observe respecting the facades, both as to the disposition of the columns and pilasters, and the distribution of the masses and parts in advance, which leave the prin- cipal entrance with a secondary decoration. The weight of the attic also, which appears too heavy for the ordonnance, is objectionable. But this composi- tion has, nevertheless, great beauties ; it presents a noble and masculine character, greatness in its masses, and tha t symmetrical and complete total in its lesser parts, which it is rare to find in extensive structures. M. Milizia, in speaking of this edifice, blames it as regards its character, w^hich^ according to him, ought to have been simple, and without luxury, conformable to its uses. The critique is just; but it is necessary to observe that this fault cannot be attributed to Inigo ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 91 Jones, who could not foresee this change in its employ- ment. We find, in some Itineraries, frequent mention of extensive country seats, erected in the different counties of England by Inigo Jones ; but these notices are not of sufficient authority. The collection of liis works, published by Kent, contains indeed a great number of plans and elevations for public and private buildings, but the publisher has omitted to state whether these designs are those of buildings executed, or merely pro- jects found in the portfolio of the artist. All that can be said of these designs is, that if they have not been executed it is to be regretted, as there is not one the erection of which would not have been creditable. Thev all exhibit the taste, style, purity, and elegance of Palladio, and the best architects of the sixteenth century. This collection maybe usefully consulted by those who wish to apply to architecture the forms, ordonnances, and particular character which distin- guish the works of the Greeks and Romans. It may indeed be said of the character of the ancient archi- tecture, that it was imitated with more success in the course of the sixteenth century, than at any period from the time of its restoration to the present. The churches St. Carlo de Catenari, St. Gresforio, and St. Caterina da Siena, at Rome, were erected from the designs of Battista Soria, whose works exhibit sumptuosity and irregularity. The churches della Pace, St. Maria in via lata, St. Martina, or St. Luca, and Sacchetti ad Ostia palace, at Rome, are by Pietro Bcricttini da Cortona. His works present great abuse of decoration, and all that viciousncss of style that an indolent mind, corrupt and irregular in its taste, cannot 92 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. fail to introduce. The frontispiece of the church des Feuillans, rue 8t. Honore, the palaces de Berny and de Baleroy, in Normandy ; de Blezancouit, a part of tiiat of Choisy-sur-Seine, de Petit-Bourg, de Blois, part of the interiors of the palaces de Richelieu and de Coulomniers, the exterior of the palace and gardens de Gesvres en Brie, the principal part of that of Fresne, together with a chapel which was, in some respects, the model of the church du Val-de-Grace, at Paris. The palace de Maisons, hotel de la Vrilliere, and de Jars, the church des Filles-Sainte-Marie, in the rue St. Antoine, part of the hotel de Bouillion, the frontis- piece des Minimes de la Place Royale, to the second order exclusively, termination of the hotel Carnavalet, and its fa9ade, the church du Val-de-Grace, and the projects for the competition of the Louvre, at Paris^ are all by Francois Mansart. He has produced no work which, from its merit, is capable of fixing the attention of posterity ; and the history of good taste in architecture is as little indebted to him as to many other modern architects. The facade of the church di St. Ignazio, and the villa Pamfili, at Rome, are by Alessandro Algardi. Alaardi, in the decoration of this seat or casino, has avoided the faults of the architects of his time, which consisted in covering the fa9ades of palaces with bass reliefs and antique statues, confusedly placed, which injured the ordonnance and symmetry. This disposi- tion in the works of Algardi is the result of a correct and judicious taste. The interior presents details of decoration which might serve as models for their species. Algardi also passes for the designer of the superb gardens of this country seat, which are disposed ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 93 in the most picturesque and varied manner, accordino- to the iiiequahty of the situation. They abound with fountains, cascades, and amphitheatres of water, which embellish and render them the most delightful at Rome. The churches di St. Agnese, decoration of St. Gio. Laterano, the oratorio de' PP. della Chiesa Nuova, di St. Carlino alle quattro Fontane, di Propaganda, della Sapienza, and della Madonna de' Sette Dolori, the palaces Falconieri a Strada Guilia and Panfili or Doria, at Rome, are by Francesco Borromini. He reduced architecture to a species of mechanical operation, and obeyed no law in the forms which he had adopted; but that of his own caprice. His fantastical elevations present a mass of vicious forms, which were never em- ployed previous to his time, the only merit of which con- sists in the possibility of executing them. The fertility of his invention ceases to astonish us, when we reflect that it is much more easy to form designs for an edifice, unshackled by the rules of art and correct taste, than to produce such as will bear the test of an enlightened criticism, and exhibit judgment, ability, and propriety of disposition. His style of decoration resembles that of a gold or silversmith, which is capricious, and without any immediate relation to necessity or propriety. It obeys no other authority than that of an indetermined and puerile pleasure. The only principle which Borro- mini cither practised or possessed, was that of contra- dicting all who had preceded him. The palaces Barberini, di Monte Citorio, and di Bracciano, churches del Noviziato de' Gesuiti, nell' Ariccia, and Gandolfo, and the fountains di Piazza Navona, and in Piazza Barberini, at Rome, were from 94 ARCIIITECTUIIAL DIRECTOR. the designs of Gio. Lorenzo Bernini, who also executed in St. Peter's at Rome, the tombs, chair of St. Peter, and the high altar. It may be remarked, that in the disposition of the chair of St. Peter, he has been very successful in the judicious choice of its situation. A window is situated behind the four colossal statues of the doctors that support it, the light of which produces considerable effect. Of the high altar, or rather that senseless production of four twisted columns, which sustain a canopy, as if placed expressly to encumber and obstruct the grand intersection of the four branches of the temple, it may be further observed, that it is difficult to conceive how such an absurdity could have originated with that same Bernini who constructed the colonnade of the Piazza di St. Pietro. The Piazza di St. Pietro, or place of St. Peter, is of an elliptical form, surrounded by four rangesof insulated columns, which bear an entablature crowned by a balustrade and statues. There is an obelisk at its centre, on either side of which is an immense fountain, which emits, with great force and sound, a considerable body of water. The immense area, terminated by the facade of the church, the spacious steps of which form two spaces resembling terraces, presents one of those rare productions and fortunate conceptions which impart the greatest delight to the spectator ; yet how much more enchanting would it be, were it not for the bad taste exhibited in the facade of the church, and the mass of the pontifical palace which overload one of its sides. Notwithstanding the faults and licences which this place offers, in spite of the bellied columns, and Ionic cornice with the Doric order, it is one of the finest productions of modern architecture. The archi- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 95 tects wp to this time, had never employed so many columns to such advantage. The facades of the entrances at the extremities, and in the middle of the colonnade, are agreeable, and the lateral arches, with architraves, very judicious. The pilasters in the two porticoes of communication between this colonnade and the frontispiece of the church, do not appear to advan- tage in their inclined situation, and accord badly with the decoration of the facade. The royal staircase erected by Bernini, in the best possible manner that the situation would permit, namely, in the middle of old constructions, is very remarkable ; the light is arranged with great art, the steps easy and little raised, and the ensemble majestic. What a view in descending ! The insulated columns, in perspective, upon the first ramp, and the coupled pilasters upon the second, show the talent by which the artist has overcome the difficulty with which he had to contend, in a given and limited site. The part that he has taken is admirable, but not imitable. The style of Bernini, in architecture, presents more licenses than absolute errors, and his graces prevent us from dwelling' too lono; on his faults. The peristyle du Louvre, and observatory, at Paris, are by Claude Perrault. This artist, in the facade of the Louvre, has presented toour notice coupled columns, which may serve as a useful example to show their inconsistency. They add nothing to the strength, under which pretext they have been employed, since, if equally divided, they would have afforded much greater solidity, iiidependentof their increase of beauty, by having a considerable less portion of the soffit to support. The peristyle du Louvre, indeed, as origi- 96 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. nally designed by Peirault, that is, before the windows were made under the colonnade, seems to Iiave been erected to exhibit the pompous magnificence of a court, and not for the purposes for which similar erections are employed. Yet notwithstanding the greatness of the style which is expressed, the proportions of the windows of its basement, and also the application of the pilasters which are employed at the angles of its pavilions or extremities, are not in correct taste. In the rest of its details, however, we are indebted to Per- rault for having revived with great ability the justness and beauty of the antique proportions ; a purity in the profiles, elegance in the forms and ornaments, and a correctness and finish in the execution. The palaces Renuccini, Aitieri, Astalli, and Muti, and the chapel del Monte della Pieta, at Rome, were erected from the designs of Gio. Antonio de' Rossi, whose style in architecture was great, and of large division. None showed more ability in lighting the interiors. His taste in decoration was correct. He particularly possessed the art of accommodating his designs to, and of drawing an advantage from, the different situations of his productions, and of giving an appearance of greatness even to the least spaces. The bridge de Saintes, the gate of St. Denis, and the restoration of those of St. Bernard and St. Antoine, at Paris, are by Francois Blondel. The celebrated gate St. Denis exhibits an architectural character between that of gates and arches ; custom has how- ever sanctioned the name of gate. It was according to this character that it was composed and that it ought to be examined. Its just denomination will then be a triumphal gate. Some details of its archi- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 97 lecture, as also the fine execution of the sculpture, are composed after the antique style, whilst the adjustments are according to the style in vogue at the time of its erection, which consisted in observing certain systems that have for a long time impeded the progress of architecture. Francois Blondell, being a learned ma- thematician, in designing the masses and general dimensions for this gate, professes in his treatise on architecture to have subjected them to, and deter- mined them by, a rigorous calculation, although in the execution the measures do not altogether correspond. He has inscribed the general mass in a perfect square, and intended that the width of the aperture of the gate should be equal to that of the piers. The height of this gate is twice its width, the pedestals are a fourth of the height of the mass, and the impost of the arch is one half of its height. He conceived that he had demonstrated, by the exactness of his relation^, that the eye ought to be satisfied ; because the science of numbers did not permit of the least doubt, in his estimation, as to the beauty of the forms so determined. When, therefore, an enlightened traveller, whose taste has been formed from the noble character of the antique architecture, presents himself before this monument, and criticises the mass as having a little meagreness, he may be immediately answered, It forms a perfect square. If he finds the width of the aperture of the gate too contracted, and not bearing suflScient propor- tion to the planes, he is as quickly informed, It is equal to the piers. But its aperture is proportionally too high. It is of twice i/s tvidtli, and this is an ad- mirable dimension. 'JTlie massive > ants thickness, and does not convey a su'Iicient idea of resistance. I^his o 98 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR thickness is exactly the sixth of its face, Sfc. SfC. The observer is obliged to agree that the calculations are just, but not entirely satisfactory ; in which exampie he proves for himself that beauty in architecture can- not be founded solely on the relation of numbers. Is it not, on the contrary, evident, that this equality of mea- sures destroys the government which the essential parts ouo-ht to have over the proportion of the rest, and gives a monotony which is injurious to the effect of this great composition ? Indeed a mind exempt from the preju- dice of false systems, and conversant with the impres- sions which bodies, happily modified, make upon the eye from the effect of perspective, and the combination of light and shade, would, in judging of a piece of architecture, feel itself authorized to say that numbers do not suffice to determine the proportions of archi- tectural designs. As to the decoration of this triumphal entrance, although great and majestic, it presents dis- similar and compound ideas. Such are the pyramids, which ornament the faces of this monument, whose mixed forms partake of that of an obelisk, and the principal fault of which is in being applied to a tri- umphal entrance. This form being dedicated to tombs and funeral objects, imparts a sepulchral expression to this monument, which is evidently in contradiction with its real character. The palaces Royal de Clagny and de Versailles, the establishment de Saint Cyr, church des Invalides, and the place de Louis-le-Grand, or Vendome, at Paris, were constructed from the designs of Jules- Hardouin Mansart. The palace de Versailles presents only an architectural total in the elevation fronting the gardens. The fa9ade in face of the avenue, which ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 99 forms the principal entrance, conveys rather the idea of a number of different edifices than of a palace. The masses are so dissimilar, both as regards the style and proportion, that the attempt which has been made to form a regular total of the whole has been without effect. If we examine the facade facing the garden, its disproportion strikes us at the first glance ; it pro- ceeds from the want of relation which exists between its length, which is about thirteen hundred feet, and its height, w hich does not exceed sixty feet. Every one must feel the insipidity of this long line, in the disposition of which there is neither relief nor move- ment. The columns, forming small parts in advance, which are disposed at intervals, produce no effect; the basement, ordonnance of the principal story, and continued attic, possess no other merit than that of a contracted conception of regularity and symmetry, which displays a very ordinary taste, and is not at all suited to give value to the composition of this great edifice. The master-piece of Jules-Hardouin Mansart is the dome of the Invalides, at Paris. It appears certain that the project of a cupola did not at first enter into the views of the projector of this edifice, nor in the designs of the architect of the church and hospital des Invalides. The manner in which the church was conceived and executed by Liberal Bruantis the proof; and when it was desio^ned to embellish the total of the establishment dcs Invalides with a cupola, this cupola could not be placed elsewhere than at the extremity of the church, which produced in reality a union of two churches, without any relation existing between them. Jules-Hardouin Mansart being more at liberty, in 100 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the conception of his cupola, than the other architects of similar edifices, since this cupola only became an addition of the then existing church, was led to design it as a separate construction, with dispositions solely in relation with itself So that in considering the plan, we find, by the distribution of the chapels which surround this dome, that it presents a total which is different from any that has ever been erected in a similar situation. The dome des Invalides being carried perpendicularly from the pavement, and the great solidity which the architect found in the accessory massives with which he could dispense, gave him the means of practising a new manner of distribution in the four piers of his cupola. He penetrated them with arcades, without injuring the strength of his supports, and these aper- tures not only served as entrances to the chapels situated at each angle, but also gave a lightness which on the whole produces a more varied and picturesque effect than is often met with elsewhere. It cannot be denied that in this respect Jules-Hardouin Mansart has given proofs of considerable talent. The extravagances and inaccuracies with which Michel Anofelo infected the architecture of the sixteenth century, were increased in the seventeenth by the caprices of Borromini, of which the following enume- ration forms a part. Twisted, bellied, and intricated columns, placed without motive upon heaps of pedes- tals, socles, and plinths ; fantastical capitals with the volutes reversed ; interrupted and undulated entablatures; misplaced, broken, and deformed pedi- ments ; inverted balusters, with facets, multiplied even to the summits of pediments; the facades of ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 101 churches in caricature, and their interiors heavy and without expression, together with a superfluity of ornaments. The simplicity of Ponzio, Algardi, and Jones, and the elegance of Bernini, ought to have had some influence in the architecture of tlie eighteenth century. How far that elegance and simplicity were imitated will be seen as we pursue our researches. The churches di St. Marta, and the fa9ades della Beata Rita and di St. Marcello al Corso, palazzi Gri- mani a Strada Rosella, and Bolognetti, and the fountain di St. Maria in Trastevere, and another near the gate Cavallegieri, at Rome, are by Carlo Fontana. The taste of this architect is the same as that of Bernini his master. Like him he was incorrect ; he neHected like him the purity of his details, and wasted to sacri- fice essential forms to the spirit of decoration. But his elevations wanted neither greatness in the masses nor a certain eleoance in execution. It was at this period that the erection of St. Paul's cathedral was completed by Sir Christopher Wren. It is situated on the site of a former church, that is said to have been built on the ruins of an ancient temple of Diana ; and had been embellished, at consi- derable expense, about the year 675, by Erkinvald, the fourth bishop of London. This church was second in extent only to the then existing basilic of St. Peter's, at Rome, and was afterwards destroyed by fire. Maurice, of this city, undertook to construct a second, worthy, from its magnificence, of the worship to which it was intended to be consecrated ; and he caused it to be erected on the same foundations. The carpentry and belfry of this church also were consumed in the 102 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. middle of the sixteenth century. After this accident, and during the time it was undergoing the necessary repairs, the whole was burnt by the great fire at London. It is related that this second church contained many valuable ornaments; and that the festivals and obse- quies of the kings and princes were solemnized in it with great pomp and magnificence. After the entire ruin of this edifice, Christopher Wren was employed to give designs for a third church, to be subjected to the former foundations. For the space of two years Sir Christopher repeatedly advised those who were interested in the erection of this new edifice, to demolish the old foundations, at the end of which time he obtained their consent, and immediately after desisfned and constructed a church more worthv of his talents, and of the nation for which it was intended. The plan of this edifice is a species of cross composed of four branches. That at the principal entrance, and the one at the opposite extremity, are much longer than the other two. Each of these is divided by two ranges of arcades into a great nave, and two lateral ones, the pillars of which are decorated with Corin- thian pilasters. It has three porticoes, one at the principal entrance, facing the west, and the other two are situated opposite the north and south at each extremity of the cross. The western portico consists of twelve Corinthian columns below, and eight Com- posite above, supporting a pediment ; the whole resting m an elevated base, the ascent to which is by a flight of steps running the entire length of the portico. At each of the two extremiti s of this facade is placed a Ksmall cupola, after the example of those of St. Peter. The porticoes of the northern and southern entrances ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 103 are semicircular, and consist of an entablature supported by six Corinthian columns. At the eastern extremity of the church is an apside, or semicircular part, within which the communion table is placed. The walls are ornamented with two ranges of coupled pilasters, one above the other, the lower being Corinthian, and the other Composite. It is at the intersection of the four branches of which the plan of the edifice is composed, that the dome or cupola is situated. Its plan at the lower extremity forms a regular octagon ; each of its faces is occupied by large arcades, forming the com- munication of the naves. Four of these arcades, which aie those situated opposite the angles of the cross, are constructed as immense niches ; the low er part of each is penetrated by two smaller arcades, forming a right angle. These arcades correspond to the lateral naves of the two contiguous branches. This ingenious dis- position procures very interesting overtures, the idea of which was probably derived from the plan of the cupola di Maria del Fiore, at Florence : be that as it may, this arrangement is much better than that of placing a massive in each angle, which has been adopted in almost all modern cupolas. There is a further advantage of forming a more solid base, and of the pendentives having less projections, by being composed of eight points of support instead of four. The interior of the lower part of the cupola is deco- rated with a continued stylobate, upon which are placed Corinthian pilasters at equal distances, and sur- mounted by a complete entablature ; over which is placed a second stylobate, from which springs the cupola. The thirty-two equal spaces between the pilasters arc occupied by twenty-four windows and 104 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. eight large niches. In the exterior decoration of this part of the dome, Wren wished to apply the effect ot a regularly disposed colonnade of equal intercolumnia- tions, and supporting a continued entablature, instead of being interrupted by projections resembling those of St. Peter's at Rome, and the Invalides at Paris. In saying that he wished to produce an effect similar to a colonnade, the expression is justifiable, for it is rather the appearance of one, than one in reality. First . the columns, which are placed on a continued stylobate, perfectly similar to that of St. Peter's, are engaged in piers from which arches are sprung that bind them to the dome, and massives are placed between every fourth intercolumniation, in the angles of which they are eno:ao:ed. In the interiors of these massives are windino^ staircases, beino- in the whole eis^ht in number. This disposition, particularly at a distance, gives a very rich effect to the dome, which appears to be surrounded by a circular colonnade. The passages in the massives permit of free circulation round the whole of the dome. The regularity of the intercolumniations, and continu- ance of the entablature, give a value to this decoration, which on a nearer inspection, is perhaps slightly in- jured by some irregularities. Be that as it may, it cannot be denied that the whole produces a fine effect. The attic is in retreat the whole widih of the colon- nade, which latter is ornamented with windows of rather a correct taste. The calotte, or exterior of the dome, has its sides decorated with flutings. The lantern presents nothing very remarkable. The curve of the dome is very fine, and nearly equals that of St. Peter's. Of late years, there have been placed in the interior ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 105 of this church a number of statues and sepulchral monuments, which partake of the same false taste of invention as those in Westminster abbey, among which it is difficult to discover any considerable number that are consistent with the correct taste, and appropriate sentiment, which these species of monuments ought to present. In this country these kind of productions are in want of a principle of imitation, to form a regulating type. Religion does not at all enter into the first conceptions ; and the more a taste for these monu- ments has increased, within the last half century, the more the artists have felt this want of a fundamental idea to serve as a base for their compositions. These monuments, whatever be the merit for their execution, are almost always dramatic compositions, in which we see contrasted, in a manner the most revolting to good taste, unsuitable costumes, mi-placed allegories, and a style of composition altogether at variance willi an enlightened judgment. Independent of the monuments just mentioned, the decorative part of St. Paul's is the least striking part of this celebrated edifice. This cathedral derogates in the most evident manner from that purity of style which ought to enter into the composition of such edifices. At the exterior, the frontispiece is decorated with two orders raised one above the other, the columns of which are coupled in a line parallel to the horizon. In the interior, the piers of the naves and choir are enriched with pilastres of large and smaii dimensions. The entablature is complete only per- pendicularly over the large pilasters. The arcanes which repose upon the lesser pilasters, enter into the height of the architrave and frieze of the entablature. 106 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. The supports of the dome, decorated also with pilas- ters, are perforated by a first range of arcades, which is placed directly upon the cornice of the large pilas- ters, and penetrates its acroteria. A second range of arcades, the curves of which are of different species from those of the first, rises upon the same acroteria. These are striking dissonances in the style of this cathedral, otherwise so justly celebrated for its great extent and the judicious execution and beauty of its cupola, which furnish lessons by the study of which may be formed just ideas of the digressions from purity of stvle. The fountain of Trevi, at Rome, the greatest that this city presents, was constructed from the designs of Nicola Salvi. The subject of this fine composition is the ocean personified, gigantic in stature, and in an upright and commanding position, proceeding from a fine niche decorated with Ionic columns. Neptune borne on a shell, and draw^n by sea-horses, which are guided by Tritons, appears to be forcing his way over a mass of rocks, from all parts of which issue streams of water. In the midst of tumultuous currents, the horses appear at full speed, with their Triton guides, labouring through the troubled element, which falls with considerable effect into an immense basin beneath. This beautiful production is situated imme- diately contiguous to the palace of the Duke di Poli, which forms its extremity, and is decorated on each side of the Ionic niche with Corinthian columns, which embrace two stories, and contain in their intercolum- niations statues and bass reliefs. Upon the two sides, but in retreat, are four Corinthian pilasters, which also embrace two ranges of windows. Upon their ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 107 entablature is an attic, which is lower than that part in advance. This description may suffice to make known its beauties. The hospital II gran Reclusorio, and cemetery of the hospital II Tredici, at Naples; the palaces Gior- dan! and Caramanica, near Spadaletto ; and the villa Jaci, at Resina, near Portici ; the churches Maria Maggiore, del Bambin Gesu, Maria dell' AppoUinare, and della Morte, hospital St. Spirito, and the palaces della Consulta, Petroni, and Corsini, at Rome, were erected from the designs of Ferdinando Fuga, whose works partake, in their decoration and details, of the vices and abuses of the school of Borromini. The interior distribution, and exterior disposition of the last-mentioned palace is, however, admired ; and it may be remarked, that few palaces have been better conceived, or executed more at large, than this. Its three overtures, great staircases, and the proportions of its facade, all exhibit greatness of design. More correctness and purity in the details and style would have increased the merit in the eyes of artists and men of taste. At the commencement of the eighteenth century flourished Lord Burlington, who was not only dis- tinsruished for his correct taste and o:eneral knowledge of the fine arts, but also celebrated for his skill in architecture, which he had cultivated with great success. He travelled for a considerable time in Italy ; during his residence in which country he studied with particular attention the immortal remains of this classic soil, as also the works of Palladio, sixty of whose original designs he collected and published, together with a volume of the Antique Thermae. To 108 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the above designs of Palladio, Lord Burlington also added several of his own compositions, at the lower part of which he modestly inscribed " Burlington, architectus invenit." This great man, who was a most zealous patron of the arts, was prouder of that title, which he derived from his favourite art, and which he had deservedly acquired by a long and diligent study, than of that which he possessed from his noble ancestors. In 1724 he furnished designs for the stately mansion of General Wade. The ground story is decorated with rustics, which gives to it a very imposing effect ; and the story above is ornamented with well-distributed Doric pilasters, supporting a simple frieze. The windows with balustrades possess great simplicity. The whole of this total presents a degree of solidity, correctness, and unity, that affords considerable pleasure to the spectator. His beautiful villa at Chiswick, which was erected from his own designs, and which he embellished with a number of fragments of architecture, is an ensemble, capable, by the happy motives which are manifest in its distribu- tion, of doing honour to most of the architects of the century. He furnished designs for the arcade and front of the dormitory at Westminster and Burlington House, London ; together w ith several other classical productions, which will be lasting memorials of the talents of this celebrated, zealous, and enlightened patron of the arts. The most important production of its kind in this century was the palace of the king of Naples, at Caserte, by Van Vitelli ; being the only enterprise of this century which for the simplicity of its plan, immensity of its superficies, and greatness of its mass ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 109 and elevation, brings to mind the eminent productions of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The principal work at the close of the eighteenth century was the completion of St. Genevieve's church at Paris, com- menced from the designs of Soufflot. The plan of this church is in the form of a Greek cross, composed of four principal naves. A hundred and thirty fluted columns support its arches, under which are galleries. The cupola is placed in the centre of the edifice, and is sustained by four triangular pillars, the angles of which are fortified by engaged columns ranging with those of the naves. The interior faces of these pillars are decorated with pilasters of the same order and diameter of the columns, which are Corinthian. These four pillars form, at the exterior of the angles, a large square, the interior angles of which are inter- rupted by a third face. The four principal sides are opened by large arcades, between which, and over the interior faces of the pillars, rise the four parts of the arch termed pendentives, which serve to form the circular plan of the tower of the dome. These arcades and pendentives are crowned by a large entablature with modillions. The interior of this tower is deco- rated with a continued stylobate, which serves as basement for a colonnade composed of sixteen Corin- thian columns placed at equal distances. These columns are almost insulated, being only attached to the wall of the tower by a kind of tongue, which does not appear from any point of view, and which serves to strengthen the wall to which they are joined. Be- hind this stylobate, and between the bases of the columns, are a species of galleries. In the interco- iumniations above are sixteen large windows, four of 110 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. which are feint, and correspond with the four pillars previously mentioned. The colonnade is crowned by a complete entablature, over which is a large socle, which rises to the height of the spring of the interior cupola. The arch is decorated with octangular com- partments and roses, and is terminated at the summit by a large circular aperture. Through the opening of this first cupola the extremity of an intermediate arch may be perceived, upon which a subject in painting is executed. The exterior of this church presents at its principal entrance a peristyle composed of twenty-two Co- rinthian columns, which support an entablature and pediment ornamented with bass reliefs. Behind this peristyle, and from the centre of the edifice, a circular gallery rises, which is placed upon a stylobate of the same form, and is composed of thirty-two insulated Corinthian columns. The four massives which serve as buttresses, and in the middle of which are staircases, are situated directly under the gallery. Although this colonnade is in a manner divided by these massives into four equal parts, nevertheless there remains suffi- cient space between them and the columns to admit of free circulation under the gallery ; where no column is either strengthened or engaged, and the appearance of a colonnade effectively exists in all its reality, both near and at a distance. In retreat from this colonnade rises an attic with circular-headed windows, immedi- ately above which rests the cupola, surmounted by a lantern. The church of St. Genevieve loses greatly as re- gards style, both in the massives of its plan, and in the proportions of the order employed. Firsts at the ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. I ! t exterior, the peristyle of the frontispiece is vicious in its plan. Tlie columns which accompany its extremi- ties are in retreat. A species of pilaster is also pidced at all the projecting angles of the church, and the angles which join its four branches are interrupted. Such are the faults committed in the masses against purity of style. Afterwards the essential parts of the orders, interior and exterior, are altered in their prin- cipal members. Lastly, the arches, penetrated l>y a multitude of lunettes, and covered with ornaments of an improper kind, destroy the purity of style which ought to exist in so important an edifice. Rome, if we except some of the buildings and edifices erected in Great Britain and France during the present century, possesses more numerous examples of arciii- tecture capable of supporting the severity of criticism^ than can be found elsewhere. The examples which It presents are formed of parts so great and beautiful, that no other country can vie with them in quality or number. Such of its edifices as may be censured with the greatest reason have still some merits ; and often fewer faults than those which are considered master- pieces in other countries. They offer a judicious conception, happy and picturesque dispositions, beauty in the total and details, and an almost never-ending variety. It is true that all the epochs of its history have not been equally remarkable, nor distinguished by a similar purity of taste ; but genius has always presided in the conceptions produced in this beautiful country. Italy presents a multiplicity of delightful habitations, which, under the most simple forms, bear the marks of genius, and show that it is possible to exhibit talent 112 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. even in the least productions. This observation ought to console those who profess an art in vvl.iich only a very rare concurrence of fortunate circumstances, can afforvl them an opportunity of displaying their talents in the erection of any important edifice. If Bramante, Vignola, Palladio, Sangallo, and Per- ruzzi, have .Wnd models in antiquity for the edifices that they have erected ; if these great masters have been enabled to employ even in the least dwellings, that beauty of ordonnance, happy disposition, and re- search, which constitute the charm they possess; why has not their example been more generally followed ? No one can behold, without the most lively interest, the works of the able men just mentioned, who in the construction of a simple habitation, manifested the same talent, care, and research, that they displayed in the erection of churches and sumptuous edifices. They have embellished all ; and in their hands the modest retreat became as agreeable as the magnificent palace. They were sensible of the importance of their art, and from their works may be learned how to redeem it from the prejudices of routine and extravagances of caprice. They adopted nature for their guide, and its imitators for their models ; they have, in a manner, restored architecture, by reclaiming it to its real end. We behold them everywhere profit from the difference of site, and fill with an admirable skill the wants which the object requires. They were ingenious even in ttie most minute details, and never executed at hazarci^ They perceived that nothing can be beautiful in archi- tecture, unless commanded by an acknowledged uiiiity: that true genius is manifested, not as some moderns have believed, by making war upon reason to creiite ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 113 noveltj' and produce fantastical extravagances, but in happily employing in tlie art the means that the nature of the intended uses of a structure indicates, and that the site commands. It was by fulfiiling' these condi- tions that they were enabled to give to each object its proper character; and being always thus guided by a correct taste, they have succeeded in overcominir the difficulties which they had to encounter. The greater part of their productions bears the stamp of that rare simplicity that enchants the mind like an unveiled truth, which appears always easy to those to whom it is disclosed. It appears to have been their endeavour to produce the greatest effect by the simplest means ; whilst the artists of other nations appear often to have sought its production in the contrary extreme. These erroneous ideas were by no means favourable to economy ; for it is evident that such architectural productions are more expensive, as the buildings and edifices designed by the above-mentioned architects, owe their splendour rather to the arrangements of their plans and aspect of their mass, than to any vain profusion of ornaments. It is no proof that the fine arts have made their abode in a city, because a number of sumptuous l)uildings may be found therein. Powerful individuals mioht for a time have favoured the ait from pride or caprice ; but when at each step we are arrested by a master- piece of magnificence or simplicity ; when, above all, we meet with structures erected for public utility ; when the most minute details bear the marks of that delicate taste which announces that an entire people has cultivated the fine arts; fhon it is that we know we are in Itdy. in which beautiful region the arts 1 114 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. were for a long time domesticated. It is there alone that the most modest habitation offers to the observing artist beauties which are less imposing from their extent, than by the correct distribution which they present; satisfying all that necessity requires. It is that refined taste, so long possessed by this ingenious people, that ought to be emulated. Our century, although enlightened by so great a degree of scientific knowledge in construction, has not made a propor- tionate progress in architectural design. Indeed, until there are places instituted, either public or private, where the student can receive instructions in its general principles, and also compete with others, the whole to abide the decision and remarks of qualified individuals, the rising architects cannot be expected to possess any great degree of talent in architectural design. The instruction to be gained in an architect's office, is inadequate to produce a talented artist. A knowledge of the different branches in construction, and the general routine of an office, are certainly essential ; but to be able to conduct the execution of buildings, without possessing the ability requisite to produce judicious and skilful designs, allowing each of these to be unquestionably necessary qualifications, the former is certainly of minor import- ance, during the limited period allotted for a pro- fessional education, inasmuch as it is remediable by a little experience ; while the latter quality rarely can be acquired, except when enjoying peculiar advantages for its study. The spirit of improvement manifested in London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, and the principal towns of Great Britain, during the last sixteen years, has ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. Il5 of'^red such frequent opportunities for the display of architectural talent, that a mere enumeration of the principal edifices erected during* that period, could not be given in the present work. THE ANTIQUE ORDERS. HwiNG reviewed the productions of the most celebrated artists, as fully as the nature of the present work will permit, and endeavoured, whilst doing justice to the merits of their works, to draw a useful lesson from their errors as well as from their beauties, we shall now proceed to the consideration of each of the constituent parts of architecture, and to the de- velopment of those rules by which their employment is regulated. An architectural order, and the particular expres- sion of c haracter attached to it, should not be con- sidered as exclusively confined to a certain kind of columns, but is exhibited in all the parts of an edifice ; nevertheless, the column is the regulator. For this reason, the name of order is given to sup- ports which differ from each other both in proportion, form, and decoration; and are distinguished by the terms Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. Each of these, from the nature of the proportions attached to it, and the characteristic effect which these proportions pro- duce, serves to express a principal quality, with which the relation of its parts, its form, and orna- ments concspond. Yet it is not to be concluded that the particular expression of the quality belonging to IIG ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. each of the three styles, is not susceptible of a great variety of modifications. Thus, the Doric order, which is characteristic of strength, may be made to express many degrees and shades of this quality, by the variations practicable in its proportions and profiles. The antique remains of this order are a sufl^icient proof of what is here advanced. The Ionic presents the medium quality, being that of elegance. Whilst the Corinthian order, exhibiting delicacy and richness, possesses every requisite to produce the various degrees expressive of the par- ticular quality belonging to it, in the modified em- ployment of its proportions, forms, and ornaments. It does not follow from what has been advanced, that the information and methods given by Vitruvius, Yignola, and Palladio^ should be rejected ; but that the orders allow of a great variety of expression, without injury to the uniformity of the character of each ; and that architecture cannot, either in its total or details, be subjected to geometrical relations. It is perhaps unnecessary to observe, that the sup- posed Composite order has the same proportion as the Corinthian, being only a mixed composition of this order and the Ionic ; that the Tuscan is nothing more than a simplification of the Doric ; and that, in reality, there are but three orders in architecture, namely, the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. Never- theless, the proportions and different expressions of these five orders, in conformity to the usual method, will be treated of, commencing with the Tuscan, and ending with the Composite, without regarding the different dates of their origin. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 117 OF THE FIVE ORDERS IN GENERAL. PLATE I. A GENERAL idea of the five orders will be obtained from this plate, in which they are all reduced to the same height, thereby rendering their comparative proportions more apparent, and exhibiting at one view the difference of diameter and general expression. The Tuscan order is distinguished by the sim- plicity of its members, and its massive proportion; the height of the column being but seven times its diameter, or fourteen modules, which is its extreme height. The Tuscan order may be employed in prisons, barracks, hospitals, entrance gates, magazines, markets, &c. The column of the Doric order has for its extreme height eight diameters, or sixteen modules ; and is distinguished by the triglyphs which are distributed in the frieze of its entablature, and by a less equivocal expression of originality than the preceding order. It might often be judiciously employed in the different kinds of sacred, public, or private edifices; such as churches, tribunals, and banks ; or in commercial edifices, as halls or exchanges, and in all other erec- tions that require a character either of solemnity or of stability and security. In the Ionic order the column has nine diameters, or eighteen modules, in height, and is characterized by the volutes of its capital, and by its proportions being lighter than those of the Doric. It may be suitably employed in the exterior of edifices requiring 118 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. an expression of elegance, and in the interior of apartments, and may also sometimes be placed as the second order in the exterior elevation of buildino-s. The Corinthian order is still lighter than the Ionic, its column having ten diameters, or twenty modules, in height. It is characterized by the delicacy of its forms and proportions, and the richness of its orna- ments. The Corinthian order may be employed in the decoration of palaces, in the interior of churches, &c. and generally in all situations where delicacy and magnificence ought to be preferred to strength, solemnity, simplicity, or elegance. Lastly, the Composite order, being of the same proportions as the Corinthian, distinguishes itself by the ornaments of the medium and delicate orders, of which its capital is composed. This order might be appropriately used in the decoration of triumphal arches, theatres, public fetes, and on all occasions where symbolical ornaments ought to have the pre- ference over those essentially consecrated to the other orders. THE GENERAL DIVISIONS OF THE FIVE ORDERS OF ARCHITECTURE. PLATE I. An order of architecture is generally composed of three principal parts ; namely, of the column, which assigns to all the rest of the ordonnance its propor- tions ; the pedestal ; and the entablature. a O :; O n f) S ^ *n « n «; rn i H W ^J f / S g lo a 11 i3 i4 j^ j£ 17 iS 10 -VKr'^ g Dumulirs or it Meiliilt.t . '4.V.1./.1 Mii/amin f-ji 1^^ /!» TtiamrTfKt »/• to Mixliile^ I .i .VoJuLv j ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 119 In each of these three parts are comprehended three others, namely, the pedestal, which is com- prised of a base, die, and cornice ; the column, the parts of which are the base, shaft, and capital ; and the entablature, consisting of the architrave, frieze, and cornice. These different parts are composed of several others, to which is generally given the name of mouldings. By this word is understood all the lesser parts of archi- tecture, which constitute the art of profiling, whether the application be made to the orders, or to the ordonnance employed in the decoration of buildings. Mouldings, in general, take their expression of solidity, elegance, or delicacy, from the different orders to which they belong. They are reduced to seven dif- ferent kinds, the names of which, together with their respective dimensions, centres, and manners of tracing, will be found in the tables and plates of the details belonging to each of the orders. See also pi. 2. THE EXTREME PROPORTIONS OF THE FIVE ORDERS OF ARCHITECTURE. PLATE I. According to Vignola, the height of the pedestal ought to be one-third of that of the column, and the entablature one-fourth. To find this relation, it will be most expedient to divide the total height of the ordonnance into nineteen equal parts, appropiiating 120 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. four for the height of the pedestal, twelve for that of the cohimn, and reserving the three remaining parts for that of the entablature. Three being the fourth of twelve, and four the third of this number, and these three quantities, four, twelve, and three, being equal to nineteen, form a division which serves as a general rule ; not only to determine the heights of the Tuscan pedestal, column, and entablature, but also the relations of those of all the other orders. To determine the expression of the Tuscan, Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, and Composite column, the height of the Tuscan must be divided into seven parts, the Doric, into eight, the Ionic into nine, and the Corinthian and Composite into ten. These divisions being made under a given height, which is common to the whole, as in plate 1, the different diameters which each order ought to possess will be immediately found ; the pro- portions of which will be — the Tuscan one-seventh, the Doric one-eighth, the fonic one-ninth, and the Corinthian and Composite one-tenth of the height of the column. That being determined, each of these diameters will be divided into two equal divisions, and one of these divisions will form a module, destined to measure the principal parts and details of the order. This module is again divided into twelve parts or minutes for the Tuscan and Doric orders, and into eighteen for the Ionic, Corinthian and Composite orders, in order to avoid fractions. The system most generally adopted for the diminution of columns, is that which commences from a third of their height. A COMPARATIVE TABLE OF THE GENERAL PROPORTIONS ASSIGNED TO THE TUSCAN ORDER, BY THE MOST EUINEtiT MODERN MASTERS. PALLADIO SCAMOZZI. 1 SERLIO. VIGNOLA. Hfighl 1 Projection' Height. .Projection of the from the 1 of the from the Mem- 1 axis of the Mem- axis of the bers. 1 Columns.' hers. 1 Columns Height Projection of the from the Mem- axis of the bers. Columns. Height Projection of the from the Mem- axis of the bers. Columns » i 3 CO '^ 1 1 (£ b S i|S b 1 -^ 1 1 . J 2 \\ - e 11 -2 i 1 i 2 i 9 '.'. "3 1 1 1 1 3 1 10 1 12 'T IE i 1 1 Jl '- 'i li 1 '. 1 S la. b. . 1 1 !22' il .]....'22' J .]^;22JJ '■ (!•|'^^^ 1 12 .. 1 4 ] i\S I 110. 1 5 . 1 .. . lis" 1 .. . 12.. . 1 .. . 14 - - nisT .. 15 . •a 1 '. 2 1 {i- 1 £|£ 9'.. 24 .. 24;.. ~r iifj l'l3 t 2 6 .... 22 .... 27 ..' 111. i' l! 9. i'3J_ . 1 323 1 5. 3 14 1.. . 12.. . 1 .. . 14 - - 17 14 ) 1 10 . 1 .. . i 13... '. 1 .. . - 15 - - .i 18 22 i . . . 22 i 1 1 Column < Shaft f Base .1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 4 — -: - ) 1 1 21|1 " i 21; i 2.. . 1 13 . 2 .. . 1 .. . - 3 22 ^ q 3 8 . . . 15 . (, Base ? 2I - - T± j~i~ lilt: Height jf.Mem bers. From fac of Arcades e Height of Mem bers. From face of Arcades Hei(,ht 1 From face ofMem- ' of bers. 1 Arcades. Height of Mem bers. From f:4ce of Arcades. ArchfVoIt . 26. .... 3 . . . 25 i |::;: .... .... . 25 .. 3 .. Key of Arcades without Pedestals r r Key of Arcades with Pedestals ....!..! . 1 1 16 .. i::;:::i:: 1 Intercolumniations from axis to axis Height Width. Height Width. Height Widlh. II Height Widfii. I (6 2 »8 . 12 . 7 2 13 1 8 2 .. 10 1 6 |20 . . 9 15.. 6 |15 .. 12 22 { Columns of Arcades withoi'.t Pedestals, from axis to axis. . \" Apertures of Arcades without Pedestals . 14 26 . . '. i? "e 'i 1 3 .. .. Columns of Arcades with Pedestals, from axis to axis 12 25 . 9 13 . 3 .. \'.'.'.'. ' ' w St i,|.„j.. J .. 8 22 i i „r ,Z . ^^1, . A A^ "mains of the Tuscan order amongst the antiquities, il is only possib le to nre-ent in this Table the opinion of the most celebrated modem njasters ; who. with the exception of Vignola, have divided the module into thirty parts or minutes To hrm a comet comparison, therefore ,t is necessary that his also be subjected o the same divisions-excep" in the detailed Tables and fil- , H -"^'hod of V.gnola has been strictly adhered to, namely, of dividing the modules of the Tuscan and Doric orders .mo orr cC'mn^s ?o'?hrfa/.htt ^^^^^^n^^^Zil^ '"'» »'^'"-- ''^^ ^'"'^-^"^ '" »" "- "^^"s ar. ^ken from the axis ^rUi':\Xt':lt^:T:^\^i'^Zu^^^^ •'^''"'»"' •"" ■ « '°«"' -"" *"- ""O -« -"^o'^ - he**", and .ne module twelve ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. i2i THE TUSCAN ORDER. The clearest and most incontestable proofs which remain for us of the style of the Etruscan architecture is, without doubt, that ordonnance of the Tuscan temple, employed at the time of Vitruvius ; who has given the measures and details, not as if this style were out of use, but in language similar to that which he employed in describing the other temples existing at his time. This ordonnance of the Tuscan temple, the only monument that we have of the Etruscan architecture, as preserved at Rome, has been the source of great error in the modern systems of the orders. To this may be attributed the appearance of a pretended Tuscan order, whicii has been placed as the first in the scale ol' the orders. From a similar error, a supposed Composite order, which has never had existence as a distinct order, has been raised to the highest place in the scale. The Tuscan ordonnance, as given by the moderns, is not, however, purely of their invention ; but, as will be shown, the error has been committed by taking that for a separate order which is, and always was, tlie order called Doric ; but practised in Etruria with some variety of proportion and slight modifications, independent of the imitation of the carpentry, or con- structions of wood, which constitutes the special and original character of the Grecian architectuie. In order to be convinced of this identity of origin between the Tuscan ordonnance and that of the Greeks, it is necessary to consult the specimen of R 122 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the Tuscan temple designed from the description given by Vitruviiis, a drawing of which may be found in Piranesi's work on the magnificence of the Romans. The reader shall, however, be presented with a faithful translation of the text of the Roman architect, on the ordonnance of the Tuscan temple. Vitruvius, b. 4, c. 7. " The diameter of these columns, taken at the bottom, should be the seventh part of their height. Their height should be a third of the breadth of the temple. Their diminution at the top should be a fourth of the diameter at the bottom. Their base should be half a diameter in height ; it is composed of a circular socle or plinth, having the half of the base in height, and of a torus which, with its fillet, should be of the height of the plinth. " Upon the columns should be placed coupled beams, the thickness of which should be propor- tionate to the size of the edifice, and the breadth equal to that of the coUarin of the column. These beams should be joined together by a dovetail, so as to leave between them a space of two fingers breadth ; for if they are placed so near that the air cannot pass between, they will produce heat, which causes the wood to rot. Upon these beams, and upon the masonry which is placed thereon, should project the mutules, having a projection equal to a fourth of the diameter of the column. To their ends may be applied the usual ornaments, over which should be placed the tympanum, with the pediment, either of masonry or carpentry. Upon the pediment should be disposed the pans and boards, in such a manner that the stillicidium or eaves may correspond in projection ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 128 to the tertiarium (that is to say, to the eighth part of the total of the tectum.)" Nothing is easier, as may be seen, than to restore the Tuscan ordonnance, after such a detailed descrip- tion; and such a restoration can have nothing arbi- trary, since not only the whole, but each of the parts of which it is composed, have been described by Vitruvius, who has taken great care to give us the measures and relations of their proportions, which the moderns have certainly departed from. Indeed, the designs which all the translators and commentators of this writer have placed to his text, most satisfactorily demonstrate, that the modern Tuscan sensibly differs from the ordonnance of the Tuscan temple as des- cribed by Vitruvius. A faithful drawing of this ordonnance, such as would necessarily result from the description and pro- portions given by Vitruvius, would exhibit all the parts and details of the Grecian arclutecture. 124 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. TUSCAN ORDER OF VIGNOLA Ileigh's. Proj Iron Co ections axis of uinus. Plates 3 and 4. Names and detaiUd Proportion of the Members and Mouldings of which the Order is composed. '3 •0 1 i « :3 •a 2 2 2 1 \" " 1 1 1 1 ..... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V 3 3 a 1 4 - 2 Entablature 3 mod. 6 parts. ' Column J 14 modoies. A. CORNICE. 4 1 Fillet 11 in 10 9 7- 2 1 9 11 9 9 T 1 1 10 9 9 11 JO 9 9 i ! * * "i' i i i i i i i i i i i "i' i 1 5 1 «Canal *Klute Fillet 4 4 2 2 2 8 1 1 2 3 1 1 "T B. FRIEZE. 1 1 C. ARCHITRAVE. Tenia Conae D. CAPITAL. ^Fillet 1 Conge. Quarter Round Fillet Coildrin SHAFT. A =*rapai , . . , 1 IM.e Conge 1 8 1 1 5 6 2 4 6 6 2 1 5 1 ^ 2 Shaft from Conge to Conge Conge 11 1 4 4 8 8 4 4 6 8 i i i i i i 4 4 E. BASE. Fillet 12 Torus I, Plinth F. CORNICE. Fillet 1 Cyma Talon Pedestal 4 mod. 8 parts 1 DIE. ( Pie 3 Conge G.BASE. Fillet 3 > Piimb , I Total.... 23 • The dimenMons of the canal and flute should not be included in that of the cornice, as the height of the canal is taken from the corona, and that of the flute in the height of the tillet. j^ The moduls of the Tuscan order is divided into twelve parts. ARailTECTURAL DIRECTOR. 125 MANNER OF DRAWING THE ORDERS. After having constructed the scale of the modules, in such a manner that the total height of the order may be contained in the given height or surface to be employed, draw a line of base for the pedestal. In the middle of this line raise a perpendicular, Avhich w^ill form the axis of the column. Having proceeded thus far, draw the heights of the different parts, as given in the tables, parallel to the base, observing that it is more correct to take the dimensions of the different heights from the base, than to add them successively to each other. Thus, 4 modules and 8 parts (of the Tuscan order for example) should be taken with the compasses, and placed on the perpendicular from the line of base, to obtain the top line of the pedestal ; 5 modules and 8 parts for the upper part of the fillet of the base of the column ; 17 modules and 8 parts for the top part of the astragal of the column ; 18 modules and 8 parts for the top line of the capital ; and lastly, 22 modules and 2 parts for the top line of the cornice of the en- tablature. These principal divisions being once determined, it will be easy to find the sub-divisions of each part, with the aid of the table. That done, the projections only remain to be determined. These are contained in the same tables in which the dimensions are given from the axis of the column ; whilst in the plates 4, H, 8, 126 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 10, 14, and 18, of the details, they are given from the face of the entablature. The profiles which result, ought always to be made on both sides at the same time : for the same opening of the compasses being employed in all the parts which are of the same projection, greater correctness will be the result, than when they are taken at different times. Plate 2 gives the drawings of the different mouldings, which enter into the composition of the members of the different orders. To describe the torus, fig. 1, divide the line mn into two equal parts, which point will form a centre from whence to strike the semicircle ; observing that its projection should not be greater than that of the face of the plinth. The height of the quarter round, fig. 2, and the projection of the fillet below being de- termined, raise a perpendicular from its face until it intersects the line above atp, which is the centre. The projection of the lower extremity, and height of the cavetto, fig. 3, being given, draw a line from the two points till they meet at p, which gives the point of centre from which to strike the moulding. Having determined the two points, b, of the cyma talon, fig. 4, divide it into two equal parts at a, which line will serve as base for two equilateral triangles, the summits of which, as at c, will be the centres for the segments, d. The cyma reversa, fig. 5, is generally employed below the eye, as in the base of pedestals; and is traced after the same method as fig. 4, which also applies to the cyma recta, fig. 6. The fillet, fig. 7, is a square member, consisting of right angles. DETAITLS 0]F TIKLE Tl^SCA^ OMlD'EiR. Mi!M FtrSmtr^lkn-s ybihSi^^iTal IHreibr Try Ji>f.-3imnett!, Three JiatyJ'as.'ui^e,Tater/t, TT'.s r \-^- 'D]E]D]EiR '^■:-'/,wm«^y .iu,J -V- '-• » ' / £ MfiJ . ' piw/ i^. k- :^^ Ml '"5 -i +11"'^" -Hit- •a J /> J 3 J ^ J nia^ I'TLb'U.z'kei Ffff "B-CP^Stm. ■ s A^^^Zat-nral X'vrtclir' k^- J'Ay. J:en^uj6t. ^a^tarryCS'^er Jto'w , Uc3'4 / p:oiuiLi])i]K'&§ t WMMjM Fiq. to Fuj A? Fig 14 -mrm ^B < --i •S£-<\'la- K Y M>^^^^^^ f I^ffttiat. I^'uiZtihad, 1^^ ST-Xtctft^n.- s ^y^chHst^co^tiL Jh^^oCffr ~hy ^oh.'>i. 3e7in>fsct>, J'iCterTicstcr' JRow,J.BS£ . ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 127 The astragal, fig. 8, is traced by the same method as fig, 1, except that the face of the part below should have the same projection as the vertical line passing through the centre o. The conge, fig. 9, of the shaft of the column > of the eastern elevation present bass-reliefs, repre- senting', in ten designs, the labours of Hercules, and on eight of the metopes situated in return, are sculptured the achievements of Theseus. Casts, taken from four and twenty of its metopes, forma part of the collection in the British Museum. In conclusion, it may be obser\ed, that the general harmony of this temple is so well preserved, that it may be considered a very valuable model of its kmd. The temple of Minerva at Athens, also named the Parthenon, was erected by Ictinus and Callicrates, during the time of Pericles ; to replace a former temple, which had been burnt by the Persians. Ictinus wrote a work, which has not descended tons, giving a descrip- tion of this celebrated edifice. It is to the emperor Adrian that we are indebted for the repairs made in this, as also in the other edifices that this city contained ; and of which, from their former good state of preservation, not- withstanding the ravages they h-ave undergone, many remains still exist. This temple the situation of which was on an emimence in the centre of the citadel, elevated on all sides above the city, presents a plan in the form of a parallelogram, like the generality of those of the ancients, extending from east to west. Its peris- tyle consisted of a range of eight columns at the prin- cipal facade and opposite extremity ; and seventeen at the sides. The entrance to the cella, either by the eastern or western facade, was preceded by a second range of six columns; in addition to which, at the latter entrance, was a .spacious vestibule. The superior part or frieze of the exterior of the wall of the cella, is decorated by a basso rilievo, representing a procession to the same temple during the Panathenaic festival 13t5 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. The whole was covered by a roof, extending in a straight hne from one extremity of the pediment, situated above the entablature at each entrance, to the other ; forming one imposing total. The ordonnance is Doric, the columns of which are raised upon three lofty steps, having a medium be- tween a half and one third of a module in height; the uppermost of which is 101 feet 2 inches in breadth, and 227 feet 7 inches in length. The diameter of the columns is 6 feet 1 inch and 8 lines, and their height, including their capitals, which is 2 feet 9 inches 9 lines, is 34 feet 2 inches and 6 lines. The height of the entablature is 12 feet 1 inch and 10 lines, of which the architrave is 4 feet 5 inches and 1 line, the frieze 4 feet 5 inches 1 line, and the cornice 3 feet 3 inches and 8 lines. The inter- columniations are 4 modules 20 parts from axis to axis. The metopes are decorated with designs executed in alto rilievo, representing the battles of the Centaurs and Lapithee, at the nuptials of Pirithous. Each metope contains two figures grouped in various attitudes. Each of the pediments was equally orna- mented with sculpture. The one represents the birth of Minerva ; and the other relates to a dispute between Minerva and Neptune, concerning the pos- session of Attica, which is executed in extraordinary hiofh relief The principal of the remaining fragments of these sculptural productions, have been transferred to the British Museum. They consist of some of the figures that formed a part of the compositions of the pediments ; a number of the metopes ; the whole remaining ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 137 frieze before mentioned, of whicli about two hundred and fifty feet is original ; the remainder being in casts executed on the spot. From the excellence of their execution, there is little doubt that they were super- intended by Phidias, and finished by his chisel ; and perhaps, for the greater part, wrought by Alcamenes, his distinguished pupil. This temple, from the beauty of its total, is one of the most esteemed edifices of this ordonnance existing in Greece. Many of the examples of the Doric order discovered in Greece, are, however, of a very difficult application, scarcely conformable to modern wants and customs, and can only with propriety be employed in such edifices as admit of great simplicity of plan, and a character of strength and solemnity. One of the best examples of this order in Italy, was found at Albano, near Rome. The height of the column is seven diameters and a half, or fifteen modules; the capital of this column has a collarin, and its abacus is crowned with a fillet and cyma talon. The architrave is one module, the frieze one module and a half, and the cornice a module and one-fifth. With the exception of the defect in the architrave, this example may undoubtedly be pronounced a master- piece. It appears to have served as the model for Vignola's mutule Doric, and is cited in the present instance in preference to the theatre of Marcelius, or the Thermae of Dioclesian, the composition of which appears inferior. It is true that the order of the first of the two last-mentioned edifices has been generally and deservedly esteemed ; but that of the latter has its capital soft and effeminately profiled ; its cornice, which is too high, is composed of too many mcmoers, T 1R8 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. and is of a proportion that disfigures the essential ciiaracter of the order. The cokimns of the theatre of Marcelkis, at Rome, have nearly sixteen modules, or eight diameters, in height ; their entablature is nearly four modules, which establishes its height at almost one-fourth of that of the column; and this proportion of one-fourth of the column, is still more precise in the Thermae of Diocle- sian. This rule is also observed with as much fidelity in the column belonging to the fragment found at Albano ; it has but fifteen modules in height, and the entablature three and two-thirds, which also ap- proaches to one-fourth. Another example of this order, found in a tomb near Terracina, exhibits great beauty and largeness of division, in each of its parts. 'J'he columns are seven diameters in height. The Doric columns at the quarters of the soldiers at Pompeia, are also seven diameters in height. These are the principal and best examples of the Doric order, which the existing remains of Greece and Italy at this time present ; in the whole of w hich examples it is employed without base. There were doubtless many temples and other edifices erected at Rome, of this order, which were destroyed during the middle ages. Labaco, in his work, published at Rome, in 1559, presents us with plates of the remains of three temples of this order which existed at that late period : and they were situated in the vicinity of the theatre of Marcellus. Vignola's Doric entablature is of two kinds ; the one is called mutule, and the other denticulated. The lirst is taken from the antiquities found in Italy, and is ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 139 ornamented with miitules, which are a kind of bracket, and serve to crown the triglyphs. The frieze is deco- rated with triglyphs of a module in breadth, sub- divided into triangular flutes and half flutes. They should be placed directly over the columns, and divided from each other by a space called metope, equal to the height of the frieze. The shaft of the column is sometimes ornamented with flutings, or por- tions of a circle, to the number of twenty, which, in meeting, form a sharp angle. The second Doric entablature is called denticulated, because its cornice is ornamented with dentils ; it was taken from the theatre of Marcelius, at Rome. It differs from the mutule in its architrave, which has but one fascia ; and in its cornice, in the lower part of which is placed a cyma talon, whilst the mutule has a quarter round ; and in the upper part is placed a cavetto, whilst the other has a cyma recta. As the column and pedestal are the same in each of these two examples, to prevent repetition, their details will be given in the table and in plate 8, as being common to both. The exclusive employment of the Doric and Ionic orders, discovered amongst the remains of Greece, as also of those presented in Italy, has each its partisans. The one party disclaims all but the examples offered in the former country; amongst which may be enume- rated our English travellers, to whom we are mostly indebted for the discovery of them ; whilst the other decries all but the latter. This party may be said chiefly to consist of such as are disinterested in the introduction of the former. In proof, reference may be made not only to the "r40 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. Uterary works of the first mentioned class, but like- wise to their professional productions; in which the Grecian Doric, of the exact measurements of existing examples, has been introduced on almost all occasions, however injudicious the application. As regards the opposite party, if equal reference be made to their writings, as also to the buildings and edifices designed by them, the same exclusive spirit will be manifested. Truth, as is commonly the case, lies midway between the two parties. For architec- ture, unlike those arts in which the rules are impera- tive, admits of modiHcations in all its constituent parts, which are governed by the character of the edifice, the situation of the site, &c., as is fully proved by the various examples of antiquity quoted in the accom- panying tables. If the proportions of architecture could be reduced to a determinate calculation, it would cease to be an art of invention and taste, and become nothing more than a mechanical art, in which every thing is sub- jected to rigorous rules. Though, by a strict obser- vance of the rules and proportions of the ancients, we might succeed in producing examples similar in their abstract form ; yet without the attendant circum- stances which governed those artists in the choice of proportions and ordonnance, the application of such proportions and ordonnance would be a breach of the fundamental law of architecture, which demands that they shall be governed by the character and object of the edifice. The principles of calculation being abso- lute, can never be applied to architecture as the sole governing power. Such an application, by enslaving the artist to a system unchanged by circumstance, and ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 141 absolute in its rules, would destroy at once the prin- ciple of invention, and give a death-blow to the powers of the art. The orders of architecture, and the rules which govern the proportions of their details, are means only whereby an expression of character is given to an edifice; the judicious application of which characterizes genius, and distinguishes the man of talent from the mere copyist. Such of the constituent parts of architecture as apparently rest on a system of the most fixed proportions, and between which a constant and uniform relation exists, though unvary- ing in their regular and symmetrical organization, are nevertheless susceptible of being modified in their application according to the expression of character required. Architecture does not merely permit, but demands a latitude in the application of its parts, which is governed by the general intention. A com- parison of the different edifices of antiquity, will prove the truth of these remarks, and render them more striking by exhibiting the fact. Whilst we discover in their works a uniformity of principles, we shall also find that variety in the details of the constituent parts which has been alhided to, and from which exam- ples may be derived that knowledge of general ex- pression, and judgment in distribution, which will serve to restrain the digressions of imao:ination within proper bounds, without enslaving the efforts of genius. Hence, it is possible judiciously to profit from the spirit exhibited in the best examples found in both Greece and Italy. The Doric of the former country, in edifices presenting a simplicity of plan, and requir- ing a masculine and solemn expression ; while those presented in the latter country are well calculated for 142 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. edifices that demand less severity of character. It may, however, be remarked, that there are but few modern edifices, in which the extreme of the expres- sion of strength and solemnity can be judiciously ap- plied, in proportion to the number of those requiring the intermediate shades. THE IONIC ORDER. It will easily be perceived, by a minute investigation of the progress of the Ionic order, that it has not been subject to the same variations in its principal divi- sions as the Doric ; because the art had made some progress in the proportions of this first of the orders, and they served as a principle to the ancients in the composition of the two last. Freart de Chambray, in treating on the origin of the Ionic order, says, " The first productions of the arts have always been very limited ; because it is more difficult to invent than to imitate. After that regular buildings and the famous Doric temples had appeared, of which Vitruvius and some others have made men- tion, architecture did not long remain in its infancy : the competition and emulation of the neighbouring people caused it to make rapid progress in its advance towards perfection. The lonians were the first com- petitors against the Dorians in this divine art ; and as these people had not the fame of its invention, they endeavoured to enrich it more than its authors had CH THE ORDEE lights Projections from axis of Columns. « 3 j-g a ~ ' 2 IONIC ORDER OF VIGNOLA, WITH THE NAMES AND DETAILED PROPORTIONS OP THE MEMBERS AND MOULDINGS OP WHICH THE ORDEB IS COMPOSED. PLiTES 9, 10, 12. and 2) Heights Projections from axis of Columns. COLUMN AND PEDESTAL. Heights Projections 1 from axis of 1 Columns. | ENTABLATURE. 1 . 5 i 2 10 &, 1 1 . 2 . 1 . 3 . 5 . 12 . 2 . 1 . 2 . 15 2 . 1 6 - 5 . " 1 1 1 ... '. 1 1 i ^ 1 1 ' \ ,1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 2 1 17 17 4 17' 15 15 "2' 4 2 2 4 4 4 3 6 7 17 16 15 12 11 9 8 7 7 7 9 10 9 13 15 1 'i i EolAblature , 4 mod. 9 parts C A. CORNICE. Fillet Cyma Recta Fillet Column IS modules. Pedestal j 6 modules. 1- D. E. CAPITAL. Fillet Cyma Talon Fillet i 'i i i i 'i 'i i 2 2 2 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 2 11 10 7 6 3 6 2 1 15 2 1 17 16 15 8 17 'i i i i 'i 'i 'i i Cyma Talon Corona •Fillet Quarter Round Astragal Fillet . 2 . 6 . 1 4 1 Canal of the Volute Quarter Round SHAFT. Astragal Fillet . . . 7 i t String of the Dentils Dentils RestofBandbehindDentils . Cyma Talon B. FRIEZE. I . 6 1 . 4 1 13 1 9 1 9 I . S . 7 6 . 4 1 4 1 I 1 1 i 'i 'i i 'i 'i 'i i Shaft between Conges . . . Conge 15 Fillet F. BASE Torus 16 C. ARCHITRAVE. Fillet Cyma Talon First Faicia Second Fascia Third Fascia D. Section of the Capital and Baluster of the Volute E. Side elevation of the Ca- pital and Baluster of the 1 Volute 1 Fillet 2 . Fillet Two Astragals Fillet ^ 2 . "2 . Fillet .Plinth 6 . .... i 1 i 3 . . i G. CORNICE. Fillet 1 Cyma Talon Corona • Fillet '' 1 Quarter Round Astragal Fillet 3 . 1 . 1 . 10 - T i 12 3 2 . 16 - 1 . 1 i 3 . • The heigut of the fillets in the cornice of the entablature and of the pedestal, are included in those of each corona 1 The height of the string is included in that of the dentils. The flutings of the shaft of the column of this order are separated bv a mia. The attic base may be judiciously substituted for that given by Vignola to this order. For the form and dimensions of the attic base. DIE. J. Die .;;::;:::;.■::;;;•■■ 4 H. BASE. Fillet 4 Astragal Cyma Reversa Fillet -Plinth 4 . lo" i 9 " Total 28 The module emp'oyed in this Table is divided Into eighteen parts. IIMTI'TT^X"? '-.r.i^Tc ni^-iiT.'w luj f^TitUat^Jm.- ^-rc'Vhiiiml Oi»«i>- ii .'iV J»i/Mee.i»»YwJloi JSn d:etai]ls of tede :i>njTnJE ©oiric o:ri31^,:r. 7^ riMlilttd. T'r BOUyrn .■ ^rAtttOH-jJ Mfilrr »• rrii, :B •nat-'-X; jnrrr An J-i-.-Mf-fan'm^ BENTKDCI. ATjEB JlDdD^RIC ©IRIDEIR o l-tn •'.-n i^oLi:, i«) y," Hilhitat't-n '■ -^V^c?ij,-5»*a/J>'vr^' ji^,.j,.-« rhf,^ Tu^- ."..- JETMIS OiFTEE BEF'Tjri'T^^TEUDOJOr OlEOi)EK .^ee.Jltre^ 2%' ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 143 done." To this remark of Chambray's, it will not be uninteresting' to add the grounds of his opinion. Vitru- vius informs us, that Hermogenes, of Alabanda, hav- ing a great quantity of marble, intended for building a temple to Bacchus, and not having at that time any other models than the Doric order, but inspired by his genius, he discovered a mode not differing sensibly from the rules of this order, and executed it on a new design. As he was an inhabitant of Caria, of which the lonians had made themselves the possessors, this manner of building acquired the name of Ionic. Without proceeding further in this inquiry, or attaching any credit to the above fabulous account, it may be asserted, that this order, as forming a part in the system of the antique architecture, owes its in- vention neither to a single indi^'idual nor city ; but to the general progressive results of experience and talent at a very remote period. The characteristic distinctions of the Ionic from the Doric order, are, firstly, in the form of its capital, the outline of its shaft, together with the addition of a base ; and also in the profile of its entablature. Secondly, in the proportion of its column, and the relative proportion between this and the parts of the entablature. And thirdly, in its decoration, in the sculpture of the capital, as also of the mouldings in the entablature : the frieze either presenting a continued plain surface, or decorated with sculpture. Hence the Ionic differs from the Doric, both in its form, propor- tion, and decoration. Tliis second order, in some dci^rce a rival to the first, made great progress. Experience having taught them to raise the Doric order in its proportions, the 144 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. Ionic also underwent additional improvement. Genius perfected both. The means were multiplied by ob- servation, whence sprung that variety in the relations of the different orders ; and these relations, taken and employed with judgment, became the source of an almost innumerable number of agreeable effects. After having made thus far an, inquiry into the conjectural origin of this order, it is not less essential that the various shades of character it exhibited be also examined; in doing which, recourse must be had to the examples presented to us, in the different antique edifices. Minerva was held in such reverence by the Athe- nians, that they erected to this divinity two temples in the citadel ; one of which has been described iu treating of the Doric order, and the other, which was of less extent, was dedicated to Minerva Polias. The order is Ionic. Columns are employed only at its en- trance ; six of which form its peristyle, and four are engaged in the wall of the cella, forming the opposite extremity or posticum. The peristyle is situated upon a flight of three steps ; each of which are rather more than two-thirds of a module in height ; the lower torus of the bases of the columns, are placed direct upon these ; being without plinths. The bases are formed of three divi- sions, the heights of which decrease in a small degree as they rise ; namely, a superior and inferior torus, having a scotia and two fillets intervening. It is pro- bable that this base has served as the type for the one named attic. The columns, each of the shafls of which are decorated by twenty-four flutings, are two feet three inches and one line, in diameter, and in ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 145 heig-ht twenty-one feet, seven inclies, and six lines, which includes the base and capital ; the former of which is one foot, ten inches, and the latter eleven inches and three lines. That part of the capital, between the abacus and echinus, whence spring- the volutes, is composed of three fillets, forming different curvatures ; two of which descend very low. These three fillets present themselves in the volutes, and considerably augment the number of their revolutions, which gives the capital more variety and richness. Both these qualities are increased by the addition of a large collarin, placed under the echinus, and which descends lower than the volutes. This collarin is decorated with the palmetta ; and the abacus and echinus are sculptured in oves. The nett height of the volutes is one foot four inches. The entablature is four feet, ten inches, and ten lines in height ; of which the architrave, composed of three fascias, is two feet one inch ; its frieze is of a still greater height, when compared with the cornice, being one foot, eleven inches, and nine lines. The cornice is composed of a corona of large proportion, having a bold cyma talon sunk in the thickness, and under the soffit of this member. Above the corona is a fillet and echinus, which, from their smallness, makes it more than probable that the whole was terminated by a cyma recta ; of which we have examples in the cor- nices of the portico of Philip, and in the temple of Apollo, at Delos, although of the Doric order. This moulding from its being the uppermost of an ordon- nance, is necessarily the first which is subject to decay. The height of the cornice as it now remains, is only ten inches and one line : great relief is u 146 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. given to the corona, by means of the small moulding, under and over, being sculptured. Tlie whole was surmounted by a pediment. The intercolumniations are eiffht modules from axis to axis. Against the left side of this temple, is another of snail dimensions; dedicated to Pandrosia, one of the three daughters of Cecrops, who had continued faithful to the order of Minerva. Its fa9ade presents the statues of four female figures, commonly named Caryatides, (one of which is in the British Museum,) there being also two in return on each side, (counting the one at each angle a second time,) which are situated upon a lofty continued pedestal ; having a species of capital adjusted to their heads, for the better receiving the architrave and cornice. The frieze is suppressed, apparently to decrease the height of the part supported, and thereby to establish a just har- mony between this and its supports. The height of this imperfect entablature exceeds a third of that of the figures, the cornice being 1 foot, 6 inches, and the architrave 1 foot, 5 inches; the height of the statues are 7 feet, 1 inch; and of the total, including the pedestal, and the three steps 0. on which it is planted, is 9 feet. The socle of the statues is 2 feet, 1 inch square, and the distance between them 3 feet, 4 inches, and 1 line. Some amongst the moderns have endeavoured to institute a new order on the authority of these antique remains. This vain determination proceeded from a misunder- standing on the part of such individuals, in what the necessary constituents of an order consist. The introduction of these objects in an architectural composition, and their occupying the place of one of ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 147 the most essential parts, namely, the column, is of itself a license ; and hence it is, that it can bur, rareiy be judiciously employed. The temple of Erectheus, situated at the opposite flank or right side of the temple of Minerva, was erected to replace a former one ; the site of which likewise occupied a part of the Acropolis; and was destroyed by Xerxes on gaining possession of the citadel. This temple is composed of four columns in front, and two at its sides ; counting the angular one a second time. The details of this temple are similar to those of Minerva Polias. The columns, the diameter of which is 2 feet, 5 inches, and 9 lines, in their height, including the base and capital, are 22 feet, 8 inches; the entablature is one-fourth of this height, and is surmounted by a pediment. The intercolumniations are 51 modules from the axis. The architects of these two temples, in order that the capital at the angle might offer two similar faces, the one at the front of the edifice, and the other at its side in return, extended the outer volute in a curved line, in such a manner, as to be enabled to execute a volute exactly similar in the elevation in return. This arrangement, which is intended to decrease the degree of iiregularity in the form and appearance of the Ionic capital, and which renders its employment so difficult at the return of an angle ; is so far overcome as to be much more striking in plan than elevation. The Ionic columns (of which the capitals form so striking a feature) in the small temple, situated near the river llissus, may serve to shew the great varieties that the few existing: remains of Greece offer in this order, wiien 148 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. coraparea with the two examples just described; and which may be further illustrated by a comparison of the remains above cited with those of the temple of Apollo Didymaeus, near Miletus. The capitals of the columns of the temple of Apollo, are composed of an abacus sculptured in oves, and a fillet and band forming a straight line ; from which spring the volutes, together with a quarter round, de- corated with oves, and an astragal with berries. This example presents as great a degree of simplicity as most of those offered in the remains of Greece, if we except the example at Athens, designated by the name of the aqueduct of Adrian ; which is of a similar design to the one last mentioned, only tiiat its orna- ments are confined to the large quarter-round of its capital, which is sculptured in oves. This example resembles the one mentioned by Yitruvius. The temple of Manly Fortune, at Rome, now S. Maria Egiziaca, presents a rectangular plan, 58 feet, 1 inch in length, and 30 feet, 7 inches in breadth; situated upon a basement 1 1 feet, 1 inch, and 6 lines in height. The cornice of this basement is composed of too many small mouldings ; its lower part ofiers a larger style. The fa9ade, of the fiight of steps leading to which only two remain, was composed of a portico, having four columns in front, and two in projection ; the third being engaged at the angle of the wall of the cella, which was repeated at the three remaining sides, by ten others that projected half their diameter from the wall. The ordonnance is Ionic, the columns of which are fluted, having 3 feet, 6 lines in diameter, and 28 feet, ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 149 4 inches, and 8 lines in height ; comprising their attic base, which is 1 foot, 6 inches, and 2 Hnes in height, together with that of their capital, being 1 foot 1 inch and 4 lines. The capitals of the columns situated at the angles, have each an angular volute, so as to present at each side of the portico, the same appear- ance. Many of the modern masters, and amongst others Palladio and Scamozzi, have, under similar circumstances, imitated this disposition. The intercolumniations are 6 modules, 6i parts ; that of the centre being 7 modules, and 5 parts, from axis to axis. The height of the entablature is nearly one-fourth of that of the columns. The architrave has three fascias. Tlie frieze is judiciously ornamented with candelabra, festoons, and genii ; the situation of the last of these, corresponds to the middle of each column. The relative proportion of the cornice is very great, being three parts more in height than that of the architrave and frieze, when taken together. The ornaments, sculptured on the mouldings of the pediment, are perpendicular in their position. The entablature of this edifice appears massive; yet on further examination, it will be found to express, by the distribution of its mouldings, the particular character of the order to which it belongs. Some of the mo- dern masters have profited from this example, by reducing the height of the cornice, and increasing that of the other two members. The exterior of the wall of the cella is wrought in rustics. The erection of this edifice takes its date from Servius Tullius, one of the first Roman kings. The Temple of Concord, situated at the capitol, near 150 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. Campo-Vaccino, presents, in its remains, a portico composed of six columns in front, and one in return on each of its sides ; with some vestiges of a founda- tion on its southerly side, being all that is left of this edifice. Tlie precise date of its erection is uncertain, though attributed to Fabius Camillus. From the following inscription : " S. P. Q. R. Incendio consump- tum restituit," cut in the architrave and frieze, which present in their entire length one united and uninter- rupted surface, it appears to have suffered from fire, and afterwards to have been either wholly or in part rebuilt. The ordonnance of this temple is Ionic, and the diameter of the columns is 4 feet 5 inches and 6 lines ; which is given as a proportional measure, as their dimensions are not uniformly the same. Their height is 42 feet, 8 inches, including the capital and base. The latter is composed of an upper and lower torus, and two intervening scotias in all the columns, except those at the angles, which have the addition of a plinth, the dimensions being equal, by means of a reduction in the upper mouldings of the same. The capital is of a mixed character, partak- ing in its lower part of the expression of the Doric, and its volutes are angular, and therefore without balusters. The architrave of this temple, which on its right side is profiled, forming three fascias, with astragals similar to that on the corresponding side, under the soffit of the portico, is in projection beyond the superior diameter of the columns, the whole of their diminution. The proportion of the cornice, when compared with the rest of the ordonnance, presents a meagre appearance. The compartments formed in ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 151 its soffitj are ornamented with some very fine roses, and the modillions by which they are separated, are placed independently of any correspondence with the columns ; indeed the intercolumniations themselves are unequal ; that in the centre is 3 modules, 25 parts, for the others the medium proportion is 3 modules, 15 parts. In the construction above the cornice, arches are employed that extend from one column to the other, in order to secure the entablature in the width of the intercolumniations, from being injured by the weight of the pediment. In the Ionic order, at the theatre of Marcellus, the superior mouldings of the cornice to the lower part of the corona being decayed, the proportions of the part wanting have been supplied in the table of this order; where this part is given, according to the spirit of the rest. Its columns are 18 modules in height, and the entablature 4 modules, 25 parts, and two-thirds ; in which the architrave is 1 module, and 13 parts, the frieze 1 module, and 6 parts and two-thirds, and the cornice 2 modules, and 6 parts. The part of the cornice which remains, is well proportioned and profiled ; the lower extremities of the fascias retire inwards ; the capital of the column is graceful, and in perfect relation with the rest of the order; the base is attic. This example of the Ionic order appears to have served as a model to many modern authors. The entablature of this order at the Colosseum, is 4 modules, and 16 parts, and the column 17 modules, and 9 parts and a quarter. The whole of this example is without ornaments ; and the volutes of Its capital are without the ordinary spiral Huangs, 152 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. depending entirely on the harmony of its proportions for effect. The base is attic. The example of this order at the Thermae of Dio- clesian, has its entablature supported by a pilaster, which was doubtless placed in the angle of one of the saloons of this immense edifice, corresponding with columns or pilasters. The entablature is 3 modules and 18 parts in height, and the pilaster 17 modules. Some of the mouldings of the entablature are deco- rated with sculpture, the quarter round of the pilaster with oves, and its shaft with flutings. Its base is attic. Vignola, in making his researches amongst the antique remains, on meeting with this example, appears to have benefited from its profile, if we may judge from the similarity which exists between this part and that of his Ionic order. Of the Ionic order, Greece itself offers great variety of expression, as has been just before remarked, and which is proved by comparing the columns, (the capitals of which form so conspicuous a feature in this order,) of the temple on the Ilissus, with those of Minerva Polias and Erectheus, and these latter with those of the temple of Apollo Didymaeus, at Miletus. Between the example last-mentioned and that of For- tuna Virilis, at Rome, there exists an almost incom- parably less degree of difference, than between that of Apollo, just cited, and of Minerva Polias, both of which are of Greece. In fine, architecture demands, in the numerous com- positions that are intended to exhibit a conformity to modern customs and wants, that the different shades comprehended in the character of each order be applied according as the nature of each edifice may ]D):etaixs dy tjte iqt^it: dirdish. Ar ol'Oif Volute I mdm JtMUUm Tsr SiHfii^ftm s ArMZtdurxl DircA-'^ Ti; JAn, Scnm-trtC: X7ira- TTtn.l'a.j-s.v^e,I-yy Z.^ i©:st:c o]K3j):e,]r r-..J\tblu:hi.i F^ J^iTUn f:- Men*ietC. Three* jlAn/ ^G*ssa*3^. Jtat^rrrose&r J^< ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 153 require; and these shades are nothing more than varia- tions in the expression of the special quality which constitutes the prominent feature in each architectural ordonnance. Thus, in the execution of the Corin- thian, a degree of simplicity may be given, without losing the characteristics of the order; and so in like manner, a less masculine expression may be given to the Doric, without detriment to its distinguishing features. OF PILASTERS. Pilasters, according to their present employment, present nothing more than square pillars, supposed to be engaged in a wall, which may be employed in this state, in the ordonnance of edifices, with as much reason and propriety as columns may, when placed aorainst, or eno:aored in a massive. Pilasters may also be considered as a fictitious representation of columns, superseding them in many cases. Some persons have wished to exclude the em- ployment of pilasters in architecture, on the ground that the Grecian edifices which exist do not exhibit this species of ordonnance. On this subject one obser- vation may be made. Few original productions of this part of architecture, as practised in Greece, have descended to us, from which any thing either general or absolute can be concluded on this subject. The works which have been cited as peremptory precedents against the employment of pilasters, are mostly temples of considerable uniformity in their plans and elevations ; from which nothing can be determined, except that X 154 ARCHITECTURAL DiRECTOR. the general custom of their ordonnances only admitted of insulated columns. The antique architecture at Rome, presents many examples of the employment of pilasters. There also exists great diversity, in the numerous structures in which they have been employed. Examples may be cited in which pilasters were used as a decorative ordonnance, without any connexion with columns; whilst in others they have been placed in correspond- ence with insulated columns; besides a multitude of cases, where the columns of a portico, or a part in advance, have been suitably repeated by corresponding pilasters. When the soffit of an architrave finishes against the face of a wall, who would not approve of it resting upon the capital of a pilaster of the same order, instead of remaining without any apparent support ? With regard to the projection of pilasters, Perrault observes, "that those which present but one face from the wall, should have half of it in projection, or at least a sixth part, when there is no necessity for a greater thickness, as in the frontispiece of Nero." The pilasters at the exterior of the Pantheon, have but the tenth part of their surface in projection ; whilst in other examples the fourteenth part only is given, as was practised in the pilasters of the forum of Nerva. But when it is intended to profile imposts against their sides, they have one-fourth of their diameter given for projection. This proportion is convenient, because it prevents an irregular diminution of the Corinthian capital ; for it then causes the inferior leaf and stem of the capital to be cut exactly in their centre For the same reason, when semi-piiasters are employed ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 155 in internal angles, it is essential to their symmetry that they should project more than half their diameter. The diminution of pilasters is essentially connected with their form. There is on this point a diversity of opinions. "Pilasters," says Perrault, "do not ordi- narily diminish, when they present but one face from the wall. Those at the exterior of the portico of the Pantheon, are without diminution. But when pilasters are on the same line with columns, and it is intended to continue the entablature upon each, without break, as at the two sides of the exterior of the Pantheon, it is then necessary to give the same diminution to pilasters as to columns, but to the front face only, leaving the sides without diminution, as is observed at the temple of Antoninus and Faustina. When pilasters, situated at an angle, present two faces from the wall, if one of the fiices be opposite a column, this face should be diminished in the same proportion as the column, whereas that which is not opposite, is left undiminished ; as at the portico of Septimus Severus. There are, nevcitheless, examples in the antique, where pilasters have no diminution, as in the interior of the Pantheon ; and others where they have very little, or less than that of the column, as at the temple of Mars the Avenjrcr, and the arch of Constantine. On these occasions it was sometimes the practice of the ancients to place the architrave over the face of the columns, which caused the face of the pilasters to retire inwards. The temple of Mars the Avenger, interior of the Pantheon, and portico of Septimus Severus, present us with examples of this description. At other times they divided it into half, by making the architrave pro- ject in false bearing, beyond the fiice of the column 156 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. one half; and retire the other half from the face of the pilaster, as at the forum of Nerva. When pilasters are employed in ordonnances of columns, they are submitted, as has been shown, to the same forms and proportions. As to flutings, there exists a greater liberty in their application to pilasters ; the ancients having left us more than one diversity. Sometimes pilasters with flutings, are found associated with columns without, as at the portico of the Pan- theon; which doubtless may be explained by the difference of the materials. The pilaster being of white marble, and the columns of granite ; which latter material will not admit of being worked in flutings ;. its principal worth and merit consisting in its fineness and polish. There are also at other times fluted columns accompanied with pilasters without flutings ; examples of which may be seen at the temple of Mars the x'lvenger, and the portico of Septimus Severus. It may be added, that when pilasters have less pro- jection than half of their diameter, fl,utings are not practised in the part which is termed i?i return. If we consult the authority of the antique as to the number of flutings in pilasters, we find nothing deter- minate. For example, there are seven in the pilasters of the portico of the Pantheon, the arch of Septimus Severus, and that of Constantino. The pilasters in the interior of the Pantheon have nine flutings ; although, according to the ordinary practice, columns have but twenty-four. Flutings in pilasters are always employed in an uneven number. If they be semi-pilasters, forming an internal angle, four are placed instead of three and a half; and five instead of four and a half, when the entire pilasters of the same ordonnance have ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 157 seven or nine. It is thus arranged, to avoid the bad effect that would otherwise result in adapting the capital to the angle, the centre of wliich should coin- cide with it, and without which, an inequality would take place that would prevent the full extension of the capital in its upper members; particularly a capital ornamented with foliage, for, without this arrangement, it could not be sufficiently developed. The proportion of capitals is the same in pilasters as in columns, as regards the heights; but the breadths are different, and the developments of their forms gives a greater space to each of their faces, because they are quadrangular. In the design (pi. 11) of the Ionic pilaster, the volutes are placed in projection from its face ; in like manner as in the column of the same order. In its height, the same proportions and mouldings are observed; the only difference being in the fillet, astragal, and quarter-round. If the projec- tion wliich this last moulding has beyond the face of the shaft be strictly followed, it would be seven parts ; but in this design it is fixed at six, that the curve which it is necessary to give it may be softer, and cut less upon the right lines against which it finishes. But it may have seven parts given to it, by observing that the extremities be brought to the same point ; namely, to the superior point of the quarter round. A, at the intersection of the perpendicular to the axis of revolution, at the height of B. The fiutings have the same breadth as those of the lower part of the shall of the column, and the angle of the pilaster may be ter- minated as shown in the design ; or otherwise by increasing the breadth of the fiutings, so that the part which is next to the angle be equal to the others. It 158 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. may be further observed, that the canal, marked two parts in depth over the horizontal line of the quarter round, (see section) ought to decrease in depth, ac- cording as the spiral of the volute approaches towards the eye. METHOD OF TRACING THE IONIC VOLUTE. PLATE XII. After having drawn the mouldings of the capital, the eye of the volute should be placed upon the hori- zontal line E, at the intersection of the vertical line D ; afterwards from this centre should be drawn a circle, a part of the radius of the vertical diameter of whicli is named cathetes, and forms the diagonal of a square, the sides of which are divided into two equal parts. From these points should be drawn the subdivisions of the axis, 1, 3, and 2, 4 ; which are to be divided into six equal parts : these points will be the centres, which serve to describe the exterior contour of the volute. Placing one point of the compasses on the point 1, and extending the other to D, describe the quarter of the circle DA. Afterwards take the point 2 as a centre; and then in the same order, as fig. I, pi. 10. To find the centres for the interior contour of the volute, the divisions which served for the first should be divided into four parts. The first subdivision under each of the former points, will serve as centre for the interior of the spiral fillet. The total height of the volute is sixteen parts of a module; nine of which are over the horizontal line E, and seven below it. Plate 12. CAPITAl, OF IIDPTIC ]PII^\§T1EI^ s ^, -^—4 fiE, \M«fulrs CORINTHIAN ORDER OF VIGNOLA, THE NAMES AND DETAILED PROPORTIONS OF THE MEMBERS AND MOULDINGS OF WHICH THE ORDER IS COMPOSED. PlATES 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, and 21. Heights. Projections from axis of Columns. COLUMN AND PEDESTAL. Heights. 1 Projections from axis of Columns. ENTABLATURE. S ■S a i 9 II "i 't i i 'i i i 'i "i * * 1 J 1 6 6 2 1 2 3 2 1 12 3 £ i 'i i i i i i i i 'i 'i i i i i i 3 i i i "5 ■§ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 II 9 ii' 15 15 "'2' 4 2 2 3 4 3 3 5 7 7 15 15 14 12 8 7 7 8 8 7 7 7 8 9 8 12 14 14 1 Entablature 5 modules. ' (■ A. CORNICE. Fillet 2 i 1 1 5 "i 5 1 6 4 1 "e 1 "»' 1 i' 6 ~9~ 1 4 1 2 6 1 5 9 'i i i i 'i 'i i 'i i I 2 2 2 2 2 {? 2 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 17 12 U 10 9 11 S 10 10 7 6 6 5 2 1 16 16 15 i5 2 I 17 16 16 15 15 15 Column , 20 modules. ^ Pedestal , 6 mod. 12 parts. r CAPITAL. Capital (For DelnUs see Plates 13, 15. & 20) SHAFT. Cyma Recta Fillet Cyma Talon Cyma Talon Modillion Rest of Band behind Modil- Fillet . . . . Shaft between Conges . . 16 Astragal Fillet Fillet E. BASE. 16 Dentils » String of Dentils Rest of Band behind Dentils Cyma Talon B FRIEZE. Astragrf. Fillet Fillet Fillet .. Two Astragals Fillet Fillet -^ C. ARCHITRAVE. Fillet Cyma Talon Plinth F. CORNICE. Fillet 1 Cyma Talon First Fascia ,,. Astragal Fillet Astragal ...., V. Third Fascia 14 DIE. Fillet . • T\e height of he string of dentils is taken In that of the dentils. 15 Die 4 Fillet G. BASE. 5 3 6 14 12 Cyma Reversa Fillet _, Torus .Plinth The fiuMngt o a ftll«t. r the snalt of the column of th dera epara fed h y Total 31 The module employed in this Talile is divided into eighteen oarts A COMPARATIVE TABLE OF THE GENERAL PROPORTIONS OF THE CORINTHIAN ORDER. 'ICES OF AMIQUITr. TOGETHEll »ITH THOSE ASHKNED TO IT Br THE MOST EMINENT MODERN MASTERS. I f Capital u^ ::: I Atliem. \\jujjitrr Olymytu till \ Height Prujcetion Neio, at Rome. From face Arcade e. II \W^\ PALLADIO. SCAMOZZI. c proJccUoD of the a or Constantlne. which la 1B| pvl§ in height, and I d e moduJFi i>mployed ii lodulo and S parte in height, and 3]nii>(!lule« i ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR, ]59 THE CORINTHIAN ORDER. It has already been remarked, that all the orders take their origin from the Doric ; — that the Ionic itself is but a richer and more varied composition of this first order ; and it will not be difficult to prove the same assertion with regard to the Corinthian, which is the subject of this article. The circumstance of the basket covered with a flag, which was placed upon the tomb of a young maiden ; and the fortunate chance which occasioned the composition of the capital known by the name of Corinthian, has been treated as a fable by many writers. But in the Corinthian capital two things must be distinguished which are greatly different, and very independent of each other ; namely, its form and decoration. As to its form, it is certain that the Corinthian existed a long time before Callimachus, its supposed inventor ; and it is the opinion of some, that the idea of its form and decoration, has been imitated from the capitals of the Egyptians ; which were sur- rounded with leaves and sacred plants. On the sup- position, however, of the truth of the circumstance above alluded to, it is not improbable that Callima- chus, on seeing the effect of the plant on the sides of the basket, derived from thence the idea of substi- tuting the acanthus for the other plants or leaves which had been employed previous to his time ; and the accidental arrangement of this acanthus might also 160 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR have suggested that order and disposition of the leaves, which custom has since established as a law for this capital. Nevertheless, the great variety ob- served in the decoration of the Corinthian capital amongst the ancients, sufficiently proves, that its form or type was always independent of the accessory orna- ments, that religion, allegory, and the taste of the sculptors, caused to be applied in so many di^erent ways. Amongst the antique edifices that time has spared at Athens, the two most remarkable are the tower of the Winds, and the small monument commonly called the Choragic momument of Lysicrates. The capitals of the tower of the Winds are very different, in the arranorement which their foliao^e offers, to that agreed upon to distinguish the Corinthian capital. The general form of the capital is well expressed, and is ornamented with one range of olive and another of water-plant leaves. Neither volutes, cauliculi, nor roses, are to be found. The capital of the Choragic monument has volutes, it is true, but not resembling the ordinary composition of the Corinthian capital. The first, or lower range, is, water-plant leaves ; there is no astragal ; and nothing of the acanthus appears in its decoration. These two examples are sufficient to prove, how much the decoration of the capital was at this time arbitary, although its form was always the same. If the primitive state of the order be examined, does not it appear that the only invention for which Calli- machus is entitled to credit, is, that of having substi- tuted acanthus leaves for those of the olive or others 'i lie certainly did not invent the form of the vase, nor ARCHITECTUKAL DIRECTOR. 161 the manner of decorating it with fohage : since, in the remains of different edifices, there are examples pre- served, where this form exists withont foliage ; and otiiers where the foliage is not of the acanthus. It would be contrary to the ordinary progress of inven- tion, to suppose that the most complex forms of deco- ration should precede the simplest, or that the per- fecting of this capital has consisted in diminishing the richness of its decoration. What is related of Calli- machus, in the discovery of this capital, proves, that its form, and the custom of ornamenting it with foliage, already existed at the time that he by chance saw this basket covered with a tile ; under the edges of which were bent the leaves of the acanthus. It is indeed improbable, that in a country where no capital of this kind had ever existed, that the feeble indica- tion just spoken of, could have given rise to the con- ception and composition of the Corinthian capital. Tha human mind does not thus effect its discoveries. On the contrary, it may be presumed that Callimachus was already acquainted with, and habituated to, the form of a vase as a capital ; and as it was the usage to surround it with ornaments of foliage, he, on meet- ing accidentally with the basket surrounded by acan- thus leaves, might indeed be struck with the analogy between it and a capital ornamented with other leaves. From the descriptions and dates of the edifices of this order, sufficient may be deduced to convince us, in what the discovery of Callimachus consisted. The different accounts concerning this architect, do not agree as to the period at which he lived ; but there can be little doubt that it was before the ninety- fifth Olympiad ; for at this epoch, Pausanias places Y 162 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the construction of a temple by Scopas ; in which, over the first range of cokimns, a second was placed, of the Corinthian order. It is not, however, in Greece, but at Rome, that we must look for the most beauliful models of the Corinthian order. The temple of Jupiter Tonans is the first that shall be described ; it is situated near the capitol, and is said to have been erected in fulfihnent of a vow, made by Augustus on his return from Spain; from the cir- cumstance of the electric fluid having' struck one of his attendants dead by his side. It appears to have been afterwards either rebuilt or repaired, from the word — estituer,\\\nc\i is inscribed upon the remaining frao"ment of the architrave and frieze. Of this majestic edifice, there remains but three columns with their entablature of the Corinthian order ; forming in their plan a right angle. Their diameter is 4 feet, 7 inches, and two lines, and their height 47 feet, 1 inch, and 5 lines ; which includes the base and capital. The base, like the generality of those applied to the Corinthian order, is composed of an upper and lower torus, two astragals, and two scotias, together with fillets, employed in the usual manner. The capital, and above all, its upper part, presents the greatest elegance ; but it may perhaps be observed, that the disposition of the leaves with which it is decorated, inclines too much in an outward direction. The volutes at the angles rise a little hiofher than the under side of the abacus. The proportion of the entablature is between one-fourth and three-quarters, to one -fifth part of the height of the columns. The architrave and frieze, at the front, present an even face, surrounded by a moulding ; the ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 163 extent of which finishes perpendicularly over the centre of the last column, at the angle of the facade, serving as the place for an inscription. The rest of the architrave at the front, as also that at the side, offers three fascias with mouldings ; which latter are richly sculptured ; the ornaments wrought on its soffit, both as regards design and execution, are exquisite. Upon the frieze on the side, are sculptured heads of animals, as well as the instruments used in sacri- fices ; the whole is arranged with the greatest taste. All the mouldings of which the cornice is composed, are sculptured in ornaments ; they are even applied to the corona and the modillion band. The corona is finished by a small cyma talon and fillet ; without hav- ing the ordinary crowning moulding, the cyma recta ; which makes it more than probable that it was sur- mounted by a pediment. There is no correspondence cither between the ornaments or modillions, with which this cornice is decorated, and the middle of the columns. The intercolumniation at the front is 5 modules, 3 and a half parts, from axis to axis ; that at the side is rather less. In fine, the whole of this ordon- nance presents an example of the highest degree of richness that it is possible for architecture to assume. The temple known by the name of Jupiter Stator, though it is probably that of Castor and Pollux, is situated in the forum at Campo Vaccino ; which, according to the tradition preserved, was erected by Romulus, and dedicated by him to Jupiter, in com- memoration of his having, on the spot occupied by its site, arrested the incursions made by the Sabines. Of this edifice, there remain but three insulated columns, bearing a fragment of their entablature, which are of 164 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the Corinthian order. Whatever credit be attached to the tradition, both the design and execution, most indubitably prove that the present remains are of the Augustan age. The diameter of these columns is 4 feet, 9 inches, and 4 lines ; and their height, including the base and capital, is 48 feet, 3 inches. The base resembles that of the preceding example. The form and proportion of this capital are of the most elegant description, and present in the execution of its foliage, volutes and interlaced helixes ; a decided masterpiece of art, both as regards finish and effect. The height of the entablature is rather more than one-fourth of that of the columns. The architrave is divided into three fascias ; the second of which is decorated with light ornaments, which it is desirable should be plain. The cornice is of large division, and the ornaments, modillions, and dentils, regularly correspond to each other, and to the middle of the columns ; being the only antique example, where this degree of exactness is observed. The whole of this ordonnance presents a noble and imposing character. The Temple of Mars the Avenger, erected by order of Augustus, in memory of his victory over Brutus and Cassius, the remains of which are situated at the Foro Transitorio, consists of three columns, a pilaster, and a semi-pilaster, forming a portion of its portico ; all that remains of its entablature being the architrave and a fragment of the frieze. This edifice was of the Corinthian order. There still exist some vestiges of the wall of its cella, together with that of the forum of which it formed a part. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 165 The diameter of the columns is 5 feet 9 inches and 4 lines. The foliage of their capitals is com- posed of olive leaves, that have but little projection, which serves to increase the apparent projection of the abacus ; and the principal contours of this foliage are subdivided into few divisions. The total of this capital presents a largeness of design, added to an elegant simplicity in its composition, which makes it a valuable model of its kind. The architrave, the soffit of which, as also the compartments under the portico, are sculptured in beautiful ornaments; it is formed of three fascias, the divisions of which are marked by suitable mouldings ; the inferior part of each fascia is inclined inwards, and the frieze is plain. The intercolumniations are 4 modules, 28 and a half parts, from axis to axis. The small circular edifice known by the name of the Temple of Vesta, situated near the Tiber, has the wall of its cella round in its plans, as also is that of the peristyle of columns with which it is surrounded. These columns are twenty in number, and of the Corinthian order ; having 3 feet, 11 lines, in diameter, and 21 modules in height; comprising their base and capital. Their base is attic, without plinth, placed upon a continued socle, below which it is probable there might have been others, forming a flight of steps around the whole. The capitals are decorated with olive leaves, the lower range of which exceeds in height those of the second range. The abacus also, instead of being pro- filed at its angles, in the ordinary manner, presents an acute angle. There exists no remains of the entabia- 166 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. til re. The intercolumniation of these cokimns is 5 modules from axis to axis. Tiie height of the wall of the cella is divided by a small cornice, having below it a die and base ; thus forming a kind of stylobate, 7 modules in height. The remaining portion of the wall is wrought in rustics ; and its thickness is 1 module and 14 parts. The diameter of the cella is 18 modules ; and the aperture of the door is 4 modules and 28 parts ; the head or horizontal part of which, instead of following the curve of the wall, is straight ; by which any appearance of false bearing is avoided. Although there remains no indication of the cover- ins: of this small construction, the wall of the cella being destroyed considerably below the height of the columns ; yet there can be little doubt, but that it was terminated by an hemispherical arch. The remains of the temple of Antoninus and Faustina, in the Via Sacra, now S. Lorenzo in Miranda, presents a por- tion of the lateral walls of its cella, which are wrought in rustics ; and a facade, formed of a range of six Corinthian columns ; having at the return on each side, two other columns ; giving to the peristyle three intercolumniations in projection, together with a corresponding pilaster at each angle of the wall. The diameter of the columns is exactly 4 feet, 10 inches, and 8 lines : and their height, including their capi al and attic base, is 46 feet, II inches, and 8 lines. The intercolumniation of the tw^o columns at the centre of the peristyle, is 5 modules, 12§ parts ; the others are 5 modules, 1 part, taken from axis to axis. The entablature, which is rather less in height than one-fourth of that ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 167 of the columns, has its architrave composed of two fascias : a portion of which, in the centre of the fa9ade, is left undivided, bearing the latter part of the following inscription, the rest being immediately above, upon the frieze : " Divo Antonino, et divee FaustinaB ex S. C." The beauty of the frieze, which is deco- rated in a large style with griffins, candelabra, and foliage, is seen to the greatest advantage at the side of the temple ; as also is the whole of the entablature; being uninterrupted, and offering one continued line. The cornice of this example, unlike the generality of others of the same order, presents under its corona, which is of a large proportion, neither modillions nor dentils ; but a bold quarter round, sculptured in oves; below which are other mouldings. The capital of this example may be classed amongst the best models of its kind. At the front of this temple was an inclosed area, the centre of which was embellished with the bronze equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius ; now at the capitol. The Forum of Nerva was also of this order. This forum was inclosed or terminated by a wall decorated with an ordonnance of columns, surmounted with statues ; a temple occupying one extremity, and a colossal figure the centre of the area ; there rest only two fluted columns with their entablature and attic, the shafts of which are buried half their height. This fragment formed a portion of the innclosurc just men- tioned. The diameter of these columns is 3 feet, 5 inches, and 10 lines, and they project from the face of their corresponding pilasters, situated against the wall, of wliich the capital of one alone remains, 3 168 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. modules, 23J parts, taken to the axis of the columns. The intercolumniation of the two columns, the entab- lature and attic being profiled over each, is 12 modules, 27 parts, from axis to axis. The architrave is composed of three fascias, the mouldings of each being delicately sculptured, and the frieze is decorated with figures in basso- rilievo, representing Minerva superintending the manufac- ture of different articles. The cornice is very richly ornamented ; and the modillions, oves, and dentils, of which its lower parts are composed, offer no exact correspondence, either to each other, or to the centre of the columns ; the capitals of which produce a most admirable effect, and the modinature of the entab- lature strongly resembles that of the portico of the Pantheon. In the centre of the attic is a quadrangular niche, containing a statue of Pallas ; and the cornice of this attic presents dentils in the place of a corona. When such beauty is exhibited in the inclosure of these edifices, what must their principal parts have presented ? The next example is, the remains of what is generally named the Basilica of Antoninus, the accu- racy of which denomination is however very doubtful ; consisting of eleven Corinthian columns, supporting a portion of their entablature ; and which now form a part of the Custom-house at Rome. The diameter of these columns is 4 feet, 9 inches, and 6 lines, and their height, including their attic, base, and capital, is 48 feet, 8 inches, and 7 lines. The lower extremity of the shafts of the columns is terminated by an astragal, which is situated imme- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 16^ diately upon the upper torus of the base ; and the capital is distinguished by the smallness of its volutes, which project considerably beyond the lower part of the abacus ; as also by the inclined position of the leaves that decorate its sides. The architrave at the exterior is composed of two fascias ; in the interior it has three ; the superior part of each of which, projects beyond the lower ; perhaps with the intention of preserving their real dimensions to the eye of the spectator ; as they could only be seen under a very acute angle. The frieze, with the exception of a small portion at its upper and lower extremities, is curved ; it was doubtless left in that state, to receive the labours of the sculptor ; hence, the ignorant and unmeaning adoption of a curved frieze in modern architecture. A few of the inferior mouldings of the cornice still remain ; the rest have been destroyed. These columns are situated upon two socles ; the upper part of the superior one, which is two-thirds of a module in height, is equal with the pavement of tne edifice. The intercolumniation is 5 modules, 10^ parts. Many other examples might be enumerated of this order, presented in the antique remains of Rome ; for the general proportions of which the reader is referred to the Comparative Table of the Corinthian order. '"The Corinthian capital," says Perrault, "differs in every respect from those of the two other orders ; for it has neither al)acus nor echinus ; which are the essential parts, and are common both to the Doric and ionic. It has indeed an abacus, but it is totally dif- lererit from two others, its four faces forming segments z 170 ARCIUTECTURAL DIRECTOR. of a circle, having a rose in the centre of each, and each face incliiiing inwards from its upper to its lower edge. In the place of echinus and fillets it has but the edge of a vase; the body of which occupies the part of the coUarin, and is of a considerable height ; beino; decorated with a double rano;e of ei^ht leaves, the upper extremities of which are bent outwardly. Between these leaves issue stalks, from whence spring the volutes, which have no resemblance, either in form or number, to those of the Ionic capital ; being in the Ionic, four, and in the Corinthian, sixteen. One diameter and a sixth is given for the height of the capital. This height is divided into seven parts, four of which are given for the height of the leaves, namely, two parts to the first range, and the same to the second. The height of each leaf is divided into three, the highest of which is given for the descent of its curve. The three parts which remain of the seven are for the stalks, volutes, and abacus. These parts are again subdivided into seven others ; the uppermost two of which are given to the abacus, the three next to the volute, and the two last to the stalks or cauliculi ; one of which is given for the descent of the curve of its leaves. Under the angles of the abacus, where the volutes join, there is a small acanthus leaf, between the volutes and the abacus ; which inclines towards the angles of the latter, so as to fill the vacancy that there would otherwise be between the volute which descends, and the underside of the abacus, which remains horizontal. The proportions of this capital, as found in the remains of antiquity, differ from many of \}wse pre- sented in the works of different arcUiiecis. in in^ ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 171 former, the height of the capital is sometimes lower by a seventh part ; being but the diameter of the column as is seen at the temple of the Sibilla, at Tivoli, which accords with that given by Vitruvius. Sometimes it is higher, as in the temple of Vesta, at Rome, and at the frontispiece of Nero, where it is nearly two-sixths more than the diameter of the column, whilst at other times they are found of the height which is here given ; as at the portico of Septimus, and at the temple of Jupiter Tonans. At others it is somewhat less, as at the Pantheon, the three columns of Campo Vaccino, at the temples of Faustina and of Mars the Avenger, at the portico of Septimus, and at the arch of Constan- tino. There are other examples where it is higher, as at the Thermae of Dioclesian. The moderns also differ in their opinions on this point ; for some have made it the height which is here given, as Vignola, Palladio, Scamozzi, Viola, and De Lorm ; whilst others, such as Bullant, Alberti, Cataneo, Barbaro, and Serlio, have made them low, after the manner of Vitruvius. The abacus, in Vitruvius, as also in the three columns of Campo Vaccino, and at the temple of Faustina, is the seventh part of the height of the capital. It is sometimes less, having but an eighth part, as at the Pantheon, at the Basilica of Antonius, and at the Market of Nerva. In others, it has from a fifth to a sixth, as at the temple of Vesta, at Rome, and that of the Sibilla, at Tivoli. The leaves of this capital have suffered no less variation. Vitruvius divides or outlines them after the manner of the acanthus ; those of the temple of the Sibilla, at Tivoli, are of this kind. The gicater part of the antique edifices present the olive leaf 172 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. divided into five. In some, they are divided into four, as at the temple of Mars the Avenger ; others into tliree, as is seen at the temple of Vesta, at Rome. These leaves, amongst the antique examples, are sometimes unequal in their heights, the lower range being the highest ; in others, the second range is the highest, and others present them perfectly equal. The part which occupies the centre of the leaves is very often cut or w orked, as is observed at the Pantheon and other places. At other times it is left plain, as at the temples of Vesta, of the Sibilla, &c. The first range of leaves have ordinarily a slight projection near the inferior extremity. This form is very remarkable at the temple of Vesta. The base which is often applied to the Corinthian column, and which is considered by some authors as most suited to this order, is that named the attic. This base is composed of an upper and lower torus, having between them a scotia, which is separated from each torus by a fillet. The base commonly assigned to this order differs from the attic in having a second scotia, two additional fillets, and two astragals. The entablature is commonly divided into ten parts, three of which are given to the architrave, three to the frieze, and the remaining four to the cornice. These proportions are variable, and the antique edifices present much diversity in this respect. The frieze is higher than the architrave at the temple of Jupiter Tonans, as also at that of the Sibilla, w hilst, on the contrary, it is less at the portico of the Pantheon, the temple of Peace, and at the Basilica of Antoninus ; but the frieze is equal to the architrave in the interior of the Pantheon. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 178 The architrave is divided into three fascias ; never- theless there are examples where there are only two. The frieze of the Corinthian order has this pecu- liarity, that whilst it is susceptible of the greatest ricliness, it may also with great propriety be executed plain. The shaft of its column is often ornamented with flutings, although it is not uncommon to find it without ; its base either receives ornaments, or offers its profiles plain. Its cornice and frieze are ordinarily the parts where the luxury of decoration has the best effect ; nevertheless, there are many examples of the gi'eatest simplicity in their embellishment, without either incoherence or disparity resulting from it. The character of richness attached to the Corinthian order belongs to its proportions, its forms, and to their numerous and varied disposition, as much as to sculp- ture, which is employed only in embellishing its details. As this order presents considerable power in the extent of its details, by which expression is given in archi- tecture ; it may be observed that it is susceptible of a very great variety of modified expression, according to the taste which presides in its composition, and the employment of its means. There exists a greater power of characterizing the intermediate shades of expression, from the simplest Doric to the richest Corinthian, than is generally imagined. The Doric, when it is necessary, is suscep- tible of considerable richness and elegance, of which we have many examples in Italy and in Greece, whilst considerable gravity of expression may be given to the Corinthian, as at the portico of the Pantheon ; or a noble and imposing character, by the projection of its profiles, as in the fragment of the frontispiece of Nero, 174 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. METHOD OF TRACING THE CORINTHIAN MODILLION. PLATES XII. AND XIV. Outline the part upon which the modillion rests, as also the rose which ornaments the soffit, or under side of the corona. Take six parts for the height of the modillion, and sixteen for its projection. Form a small scale, three parts and a half in height, as in plate 12, and divide it into sixteen parts. The figure in plate 12 shows the dimensions to be given to the small squares, the angles of which serve as centres from which to describe the curved parts of the modil- lion. Draw the line AB, and divide it into four equal parts by perpendicular lines, which, at the intersection of the verticals coming from AB, will give the points from whence to draw the segments of the circle which completes the form of the modillion. The acanthus leaf which supports the modillion, and the profile of the rose which ornaments the soffit, may also be drawn with the compasses. method of drawing the CORINTHIAN CAPITAL. PLATE XV. The half of the plan is given as seen in face, and the other half upon the angle. After having drawn the axis of the plan to correspond with the axis of the elevation of the capital, describe a circle of a radius IMETMOU) OT TMACIEr THE lOS'IC VOX.1IJTE ti'it/ >'j — 7- j V I V ■ N - , 1 ii -' ^^^v^.^ -^ M« € Ol^lIS'TIIIAF' OIRID 3? l«l , .>«a« . ^rOiOaira l>irtt>r »> Jt>n Bmmrte Tirn-^ X)IETAIX,§ OJF THE COKI^THIAK' 01UDJS3?. J ^ rMf^ , i . . f ,, f ,, ^ !, ^<.y«Ar :.>n- r h ia :^' p :i n_,,A ^^ t kr , --u-+-^ t^^^-4it A COMPARATIVE TABLE OF THE GENERAL PROPORTIONS OF THE COMPOSITE ORDEK, FROM THE MOST CELEBRATED EDIFICES OF ANTIQUITY, TOGETHER WITH THOSE ASSIGNED TO IT BY THE MOST EMINENT MODERN MASTERS. Arch of Titus at Rime. Arch of Septimus S'erc at Rome. ..s ThernuB of Dioclesian,at Rom^. PALLADIO SCAMOZZI. VIGNOLA. Height of the Mem- bers. Projection from the axis of the' Columns- Height of the Mem- bers. Projection from the [ axis of the Columns.] Height of the Mem bers. Projection from the axis of the Columns, Height of the Mem- bers. Projection from the axis of the Columns. Height of the Mem- bers. Projection from the axis of the Columns. Height of the Mem- bers. Projection from the axis of the Columns. S 2 1 5 2 16 : 14 16 1 1 4 i 1 •a S .... 1 1 28 10 19 26 ii i 4 i i _l 'i S 2 1 2 16 1 23 s B 25 15 !! 8 1 10 29 1 i i i i 1 2 1 1 1 21 26 6 16 26 12 i i J 1 1 1 4 2 16 1 19 24 2lL. 14'.. i9;_4 ii'.. 17 i > i 29, i 1 1 1 ~^ 1 {r 1 18'. .1 27'.. 1 a' 4 16 .. 26..; ", i -1- _Ei 1 1 1 4 2 16 1 20 24 20 10 10 18 1 25 4 i i 2 1 1 w 1 IS 5 4 1 S 1 1 1 3 2 16 1 19 23 1 16 9 27 10 5 .. 15 12 25 1 i i 4 "a t s 2 1 z f 13 26 3 £ 2 .. l'l5 115 2 10 16 20 'I- 1 1 1 S 2 1 z 1 (i- 1 s 25 25 6 16 25 ii 1 i z i Jl 15 .. 26'.. ..i.. 12 .. ~i" -1- ■1- 22 .. 29 J 6] - wr. ^ Base 20 25 1 - S i 25, - - 26 ~23 5' 6 ..'20 620 i i 5 1 1 : 25 11 25 i ! ■ 26 i 22j i 28 21 25 i 2 1 2 12 15 13 - 8 1 1 4 20 4 4 2 1 2 10 15 12 i - 4 1 25 4 20 i i 1 1 1 27' 12 .. 27[.. 3 1 22 24 15 i 1 1 1 28 11 25 - 4 2 8 1 121 H|4 - -1 ' 20 - • -i- 6 1 4 - Height ofMem- bers. Krom face of Arcades. Height of Mem- bers. From face of Arcades. Height ofMera- bers. From face 1 of 1 Arcades. Height ofMem- bers- From face 1 "' 1 Arcades. Height ofMem- bers. From face of Arcades. Height ofMem- bers. From face of Arcades. 1 1 11 r^ 22 8 » 2 10 2 12 4 .... 20 1 2 .... 7 .... 10 i "i } } ..!.. .... ;; 1 1 9 i i 15 6 1 1 2 1 28 25 4 .... 13 6 4 1 1 ■• 10 8 Key of Arcades without Pedestals 3 |(2 1 5 1}.... '••■■ 2 .... 1 utercolumniatioDs from axis to axis J| , Kelgnt. Widlh. Height. ] Width. Height. Widlh, Height. Width. Height. Width. Height. Width. 1 1 1 5 20 18 25 23 15 20 16 12 8 14 10 > 12 ! 24 .. 28 .. 28 .. 18 6 12 9 16 12 20 1 Columns of Arcades without Pedestals, from axis to axis Apertures of Arcades witlvout Pedestals l"" ...::;:: Columns of Arcadeswilh Pedestals, from axis to axis Apertures of Ai cades with Pedestals 29 26 15 5 i / 8 \21 1 16 24 18 24 'i }29 2 13 4 (12 \21 6 21 i 10.. 23 .. 1 } 24 20 14 9 15 li 4 ■■ir-TT' ^ __ __ „ irus is a second plinth, or socle, which in the former is 25 parts in neight. ami odule and 14} parts in projection. The arch of Septimus Severus has als( Between the bases of the columns and cornices of the pedestals of the Arches of Titus and Sepli 1 module and 15J parts in projection from the axis of the column ; and in the latter 20 parts in height ^ . -- unoer the bases of its pedestals 1 module and 11 parts in height, and 2 modules and 12i parts in projection, which dimensions are not included In the separate proporlions of the ccl psdestal, but in the height given of the columns of arcades with pedestals. There is lilrewise a s.icle un-ier the bases of the columns withou pedeilols nf the arcades of Scamoai ', m-ille • taken from the axis of the column, which dimension will be found include<: 'n its proper place W The modu> employed in this table is divided into lliirlv r«rt» height, and 1 module and 14 parts in projecti( COMPOSITE ORDER, WITH THE NAMES AND DETAILED PROPORTIONS OF THE MEMBERS AND MOULDINGS OP WHICH THE ORDER 18 COMPOSED. PtiTEs 17. 18. 19. 20. and 21. Heights. Projections from axis of Columns. COLUMN AND PEDESTAL. Heights. Projections ftomaxisof Columns. ENTABLATURE. 1 S 2 1 1 II 1 5 1 2 5 I 4 "i' 7 1 5 z i 17 7 9 1 2 3 1 10 2 8 9 i 'i "i 'i 'i 'i 1 S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .... 1 1- 1 ■si 15 15 10 9 7 7 5 15 M 11 8 11 5 4 17 16 15 15 4 4 2 2 17 17 16 15 1 'i i 'i i 'i 'i i 1 2 2 6 6 2 1 2 3 2 1 12 3 1 'i 'i i i i i i i i 'i i i 4 1 1 ■{■}• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I ] 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 £s £ 9 .. 17' '.'. 15 .. 15 .. "'2' '.'. 2 .. 4 .. 2 i 2 .. 3 i 3 1 3 i 2 i 5 .. 7 .. 7 .. 15 .. 14 i 13 4 10 i 8 i 7 i 7 .. 9 8 * 7 .. 7 .. 9 .. 9 .. 9 i 12 i 13 i 15 .. 15 .. Entablatitre 5 modules. C A. CORNICE. Fillet Column 20 modules. Pedestal , 6 mod. 12 parts. C CAPITAL. Capital (for Delaili tee P(alMl7,19.i20).... SHAFT. Fillet Cyma Talon Astragal Corona Cyma Recta under Corona . Fillet Shaft between Conges . . . 16 • String of Dentils Dentils RestofBand behind Dentils Quarter Round B FRIEZE. Astragal Fillet Fillet E. BASE. 16 1 Conge Frieze Conge . . C. ARCHITRAVE. Fillet 2 4 6 P. CORNICE. 1 Cavetto Aat/sgai First Fascia Cyraa Talon Cyma Talon 1 3 1 ^ Second Fascia ,,,.. Cyma Recta [ • The height of the string of dentils is taken 7 1 5 1 14 1 1 16 2 1 4 1 3 1 3 4 12 12 Frieze Astragal DIE Fillet n that of the dentils. Die^ 4 G. BASE. 5 Cyma Reversa Fillet Total 31 • The module employed in this T»bl« i. Mv ded Into eighteen parU ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 17? space at the angle of the pilaster would become too large, if not ornamented with an astragal which ex- tends the whole height of the shaft of the pilaster, [f it is found necessary to the regularity of the soffit to diminish the superior diameter of the pilaster A, according to that of the column behind which it is intended to be placed, the disposition of the leaves will then change their place to B, and become narrower. All the projections in the proportions given by the line drawn from the extremity of the diagonal of the abacus C to the astragal D, equally retire ; but the height of the whole still remains the same. It may sometimes happen, in decorating a facade with pilasters, that according to this first design, the abacus may not have sufficient projection ; in such cases it may receive the same apparent projection as that of the abacus of columns, from the face of the architrave E, to the extremity of the diagonal F, giving the same projections to all the leaves and volutes on the line GH, so as to give it greater development, since on these occasions there is no necessary restraint on ac- count of its being employed independent of columns. THE COMPOSITE ORDER. The order named Composite owes its origin entirely to the moderns. More than one cause has operated in giving rise to the unnecessary distinction of this supposed order ; and among the most prominent may be enumerated an erroneous mode of reasoning, re- sulting from a want of adequate knowledge of the true principles on which invention in architecture is founded 2 A 178 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. together with a hasty assumption of the existence of this order from equivocal examples ; an ignorance of the character of numerous antique edifices, in which the greatest variety of decoration may be found in the same order; and a consequent erroneous judgment. The orders are to architecture what tones are to music, or the proportions of the human form to painting and sculpture ; and it would be equally as ridiculous to seek new modes of architecture, as to assume new proportions in the structure of man. This false idea of invention, which has so gratuitously employed the genius of certain architects, has indeed been the real origin of the pretended Composite order. The principal mistake of those who believed in the invention of new orders, rested upon an illusion very easily dissipated. They imagined, in their inventive mania, that to compose a capital in the taste of a new adjustment, was sufficient to produce a new order ; they believed that to change the profiles of a base, in substituting one moulding in the place of another, or of adapting to the capital of a column some few allegorical emblems, was sufficient to entitle them to the honour of having formed a new order. The three orders of architecture possess the entire means whereby this art renders sensible the various o:rades of character or expression ; and though that expression or character may be considerably varied, and something novel pro- duced, yet it will be found upon close examination, to result only from a combination of the means contained in the three primitive orders, and not from invention. Thus, the pretended Tuscan order, which the moderns have believed to be a superlative of the Doric, exhibits in reality but a diminution of the cha- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ]79 racter of strength of this order ; whilst the supposed Composite has been placed from its conformation between the Ionic and Corinthian, without possessing either the elegance of the one, or the richness of the other. It is not intended to deduce from the above, that architecture is confined to three distinct ratios of pro- portion in the three orders, or that it cannot nor ought to modulate them, when necessary to express the various shades requisite to characterize the different edifices. On the contrary, it is in the happy combi- nation of different proportions, &c., that the talent of the architect displays itself; the proportions of each order being so susceptible of variety, that the art draws from thence its most numerous resources for the ex- pression of difference in character. And since it cannot be denied that the proportions are the true characteristics of each order, it must be left to taste sometimes to vary the accessories, which are still more distinctive in appearance than the substance of the order itself The decoration of the capitals of columns may be placed amongst the number of these accessory parts ; for it is neither by the echinus, the volutes, nor the foliage alone, that the intelligent mind will determine the essentially distinguishing character of the orders. In speaking of the Corinthian order, it was shown that the decoration of the capital of this name, is entirely independent of its form ; and it shall now be proved that the ancients, without changing its essential form, have diversified its decoration ad injinitum. If the opinion be erroneous that decoration consti- tutes the capital, and that any new ornament applied l8U ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. to lU form may produce a new species of capital, it is still more erroneous to make the existence of a new order depend, not in a new composition of proportions, nor in a particular distribution of the modinature and forms, neither in a characteristic formation of a capital, but solely in a new combination of ornaments, or of the parts of capitals. Now the pretended Composite order has the same proportions, the same modinature, the same principles, and the same form of capital as the Corinthian order ; it differs only in the combination of the ornaments of two capitals, and therefore does not contain that which is requisite to constitute a new order. It is not amongst the Romans, with whom this new order is pretended to have had its origin, that we must seek for examples and authorities to justify the suppo- sition ; for it may be shown, in the most satisfactory manner, by a deep and accurate investigation of the varied symbolical compositions employed by the Ro- mans in the decoration of capitals, to mark more strongly the character of particular monuments, that they who are represented as its inventors did not so much as suspect its existence. If the architecture of the Arch of Titus be examined, there will not be found either in the profiles of the entablature, or in those of the base of the column, in the proportion, or in the decoration of the ordonnance, greater variety than is frequently found between one antique edifice of the Corinthian order and another. There is in every respect a greater difference between the Corinthian of the frontispiece of Nero and that of the Pantheon, or of the Thermae of Dioclesian, than between the pretended Composite of the Arch of Titus and the ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 181 frontispiece of Nero above-mentioned ; that difference being only in a part of the decoration of the capital. But if the difference of the capital constitutes an order, it follows that there must be as many different orders as there can be found capitals ; consequently several hundreds may be enumerated. The ancients, considered the capitals of columns rather under a significant relation, (of which allegory might avail itself to characterize the particular uses of edifices,) than as the characteristic types of archi- tecture. The Corinthian capital, by the extent of its developments, variety of its aspects, facility of modi- fying its decoration to the purposes of allegory, and the richness of its sculpture, was that which best answered their taste for symbols and the magnificence of attributes. To prove what has been asserted, reference may be made to the collection of antique fragments by Piranesi, to shew the fertile invention of the ancients in the composition of capitals, and the decoration of the Co- rinthian order. These examples are taken from hun- dreds of the same kind, which have escaped the general destruction of Roman magnificence, and which will serve to show that the existence of a pretended Composite order, is in reality but a precedent trans- mitted to us by the renovators of architecture, the existence of which as a distinct order is instantly de- stroyed by the indicated comparison. The only just inference that can be deduced from these facts and authorities is, that the pretended Composed or Composite capital, is but one of the thousand and more capitals invented amongst the Romans ; and which has no more claim to a distinct 182 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. place amongst the orders than those which have just been referred to. There are three things very distinct in the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian orders; their form, ornament, and proportion. These three distinguish themselves from the other two, the supposed Tuscan and Com- posite, in all these points : therefore it must be a great mistake to pretend to invent a new order by changing one of these characteristics only. For if the form be changed without changing the ornaments, or the orna- ments without the form, or both without changing the proportion, the production would be nothing new. In architecture, as in other arts, the ancients acknow- ledged only three points of comparison ; the greatest, the least, and the medium between the two. All the edifices of which we have any knowledge, or that it is possible to invent, always express in their appearance more or less solidity, gravity, simplicity or elegance, lightness, grace or magnificence. As between the greatest and the least there can be but one mean term that unites in a certain degree these opposite qualities, the ancients have done nothing more than fix these three terms. In the Doric, by the characters which convey the idea of solid supports, grave orna- ments, and strong or short proportions. In the Corin- thian, by the most delicate forms, by rich decoration, and by light and graceful proportion. In the medium, or Ionic order, by the medium employment of forms, ornaments, and proportions equally distant from the strength and simplicity of the one, and the lightness and richness of the other. f r^iM Ql m ill __«J, v^ jDETAIILS OJF THE COMPOSITE 0]RIi)M., 3«j^*», JTt^cff 2hrv Ta^-sa^e T^Xforyi.osvtr- 2c-c-^. . >r DJ^TF r£n.'f34 C OjR M'THIAIS' C AFITAI. . nnnnn mnnpor COMP© SITU TAPJ TAL iTICUI-ATEL. ECEI~ : :. 1 : CORI!' Pi-i^ K »i o o o loe;0 100^0 OOQOOO @0QO0O GO Wmif; MUTULP: riORIC. TUS CAII. I VI P O S I T E J/^,^c^~ ^ -^» t ' ■ < 1— I 1 1 1- ^ .^ \,M^«f. t^W, ^P>^^, ^,U.wtC^ H ©F TMIB ®TKM?,K8 3 s t J f 1 ; \ 1 ■ "x ' ■i 1 ^ ?• ■?. — ' ■ "? - \ a \ r < 1 : \ M ]\ =8 1 '' '" . X > I: I ; ^^ I ■\ I i 1 \ L=.^= / \ : / Y~ — ;^ ■- n. 1 . 1 \^ -- 'B > ' " - \ r \ ^ M W- / - \ 1 i i ' ^ -f- ^ r '^ n ■ '1 1 " ^ « .. ■ » - ' ■■ - f- ^ ^ ^ -1 - J.. \ \ /=^ J -.^ ^ N ' '( K \p _|Z__ Y^-^ ►J I s > -- h' 3 \ 3 - !1 i \ i -* / \ — 5' - - !! A I:-:-C/.u IjOKI'"' IC'ITIC . C r> R UJT HL\1 1 ■ruSINIHlAN OP ^.-iLL-iDI'J. \ Z fiv» Vui Sfole "bAx Vu''hd«klr^^Si» Cefot^um^ {?rd^r . 7^--id-i JitStihfA- Tt^^iUknfim ' ^i\iita»^ J/u'tti^ ^ J?,-^ ienridO. Thr^ iow. jl...... ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 185 Having proceeded thus far, raise at equal distances between them two other vertical lines, to form the axis of the Doric and Ionic orders. Draw a line from the top of the axis of the Corinthian order to the top of that of the Tuscan, and the points of intersection between this line and the two axes of the Doric and Ionic will give the corresponding heights of the parts of these intermediate orders, as is shown in plate 22. The Composite order being of the same dimensions as the Corinthian, it was considered better to substitute upon the same plate, the proportions of the Corinthian of Palladio, as presented in some of the edifices erected in Italy. DIMINUTION AND ENTASIS OF THE SHAFTS OF COLUMNS. PLATE XXIII. The ancients have diminished and imperceptibly curved the outline of the shafts of their columns; commencing; either from a third of the heiorht of the shaft, taken from the top part of the superior torus of the base, or otherwise from its lower diameter, and likewise from the astragal, if there be one, to the under part of the astragal upon which the capital is placed. The fillet over the base always forms a part of the shaft, as also does the astragal at the upper extremity ; the projection of which from the centre of the column always corresponds to half the lower diameter of the shaft, which is of one module. The outline of those which diminish from the bottom to the top is not pre- cisely straight, but is slightly curved, as may be seen 2b 186 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. by the first figure. The second example is most practised, and may be employed when the diminution is intended to commence from one-third of the heijiht. This last means may serve for any height, by multi- plying the divisions from the inferior to the superior diameter. A TABLE OF THE DIMINUTION OF COLUMNS, TAKEN FROM THE BEST ANTIQUE EXAMPLES. SHAFTS OF COLUMNS /■Temple of Theseus, at Athens Doric ) Temple of Minerva, at Athens J Theatre of Marcellus Ionic , Temple on the Ilissus, at Athens .... Temple of .Minerva Pjlias, at Athens Temple of Fortuna Virilis T^mpie of Concord . Theatre of Marcellus Corinthian ' Temple of Jupiter Tonans Temple of Jupiter Stator Interior of the Pantheon . . Altars of the Pantheon Portico of the Pantheon . . , Temple of Vesta Temple of the Sibilla Frontispiece of Nero Temple of Peace Colosseum Temple of Faustina Basilica of Antoninus .... Portico of Se])timus ^ Arch of Constantine Composite Arch of Titus Arch of Septimus .... I ThermJe of Dioclesian Temple of Bacchus . . OP THE SHAFTS. Proportion. Height. 17 1 31 1^ 23 4i 18 lOi 24 4i 38 5 21 1 I 39 3i 40 8 29 4 11 7i 40 2i 29 3 20 Si 52 5i 52 65 21 4* 38 7| 40 5 28 9 23 i 17 4 23 U 38 4i 11 5 Dimi- nution. The diminution of the shafts of the columns, in all the antique edifices at Rome, commences from their inferior diameters ; except in those at the Colosseum, Arches of Severus and Con- stantine, and Temple of the Sibilla, at Tivoli, where it commences from a third of their height. N. B. The above Table presents both the height and proportion of each of the shafts of the difTerent orders of columns it contains, thereby facilitating the comparison of their diminution, which is of the whole of the superior diameter of the shaft. The module employed is divided into thirty parts. IDIMIMIUTItD:?5r OiF coiLir&fErs J'?" ^9'^- \ :>* A, >■ 5. d. : * * / • »»»»- 1 « V.rf- ^?.^....i.. Af-^ /•*rr rhra* RtA T.' . i.utf 7. v Z,r X)::ii>Ji:^rTio:^ dt tub shafts ot cDX-r:Mi-T§» '^-'W^ \... „ ^^fr-.-r I ■ I L lAi_L-. a-L-l-i- ir ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 187 RULES OF PROPORTION FOR THE DIMINUTION WHICH SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE SUPERIOR DIAMETER OF THE SHAFTS OF THE DIFFERENT COLUMNS, ACCORDING TO THEIR HEIGHT, FROM FIFTEEN FEET TO FIFTY. PLATE XXV. The shafts of columns of fifteen feet should have the inferior diameter of their shaft divided into six parts ; five of these same parts given to the superior diameter of the shaft will determine the diminution. Those of twenty feet, being divided into six parts and a half at their lower diameter, should be reduced at their upper diameter to five parts and a half Those of thirty feet must be divided into seven parts at their lower diameter, and reduced at the upper to six. Those of forty feet, being divided at their inferior diameter into seven parts and a half, must be reduced at the superior diameter, under the astragal, to six parts and a half Lastly, those of fifty feet in height, should be divided into eight parts at their inferior diameter, seven of which should be given for the superior diameter. The same plate likewise explains the reason why columns of different hei2:hts should varv in their dimi- nution ; by showing that the lines which proceed from that part of any object which is situated at a con- siderable elevation, forms a more acute angle to the sight than those connected with one of equal dimen- sions, but which is less elevated. These are the rules and opinions given by Vitru- vius ; yet the remains of antiquity do not furnish us tS8 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. with examples where they have been strictly applied (^see the Table) ; which serves to show that rules of this kind, as well as all others, require a suitable modification, according to the attendant circum- stances, which the judgment of the artist can alone determine. These different proportions do not change in the least those fixed upon for modern capitals. Those which are antique may be consulted under the dif- ferent relations of the heights of the columns, nearly all of which vary, either in their general proportions, or in those of their details. (^See the Table of each of the Orders.) PROPORTION OF ENTABLATURES, ACCORDING TO THE HEIGHTS OF THE COLUMNS, AFTER THE MANNER OF VITRUVIUS. PLATE XXV. For columns from twelve to fifteen feet high, the architrave should have half a diameter in height; and dividing the architrave into four parts, three should be given for the height of the frieze. Those from fif- teen to twenty feet should be divided into thirteen parts, one of which will be the height of the archi- trave. Divide this part into four others, and appro- priate three for the height of the frieze. For those from twenty to twenty-five feet, the columns must be divided into twelve parts and a half, and one of these parts will be the height of the architrave. The frieze Fm®TP®KTI®IT <0)]P ]EMTA]Bl,A.TinR'Ef'' L^^ U TO THE HEI9HTS OF COLTMl- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 189 has the same proportion as the example last men- tioned. Columns from twenty-five to thirty feet must have their height divided into twelve parts : one of these parts will give the height of the architrave. The frieze has the same proportion as the preceding example. If it is wished to place a basso-relievo, or any other ornament, on the frieze, it is then necessary to make it equal to the whole height of the architrave, and to give to the cornice such a proportion as is stated below. The different proportions that Vitruvius assigns for each of the mouldings which compose his entablatures, do not coincide with any other adjustment. The proportional heights are as follow. The architrave and frieze, being already determined by the rules before given, must be divided into eight equal parts ; and taking five for the height of the cornice, in which height its mouldings must be distributed, observe that their total projection, perpendicular from the face of the frieze, must be equal to the height of the cornice ; so that if the cornice have two modules in height, it will also have two modules of projection. The columns in this plate are drawn to an equal height, having only marked on each the relative proportion which ought to exist between the column and entablature ; it being considered more easy to judge of the differences in the proportion of entabla- tures when compared one with another, than when each is compared with its column. The proportion of entablatures may always be the same with relation to columns; but the members of 190 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. which they are composed ought to have more or Jess expression, at all times avoiding confusion, according to their different dimensions. This rule for the entablatures supported by columns^ is applicable more or less to those employed in the generality of buildings, which may be characterized either by simplicity or richness ; and also by the ordonnance of the details, in such a manner that they will clearly express the character of the order to which they belong, although there be neither columns nor pilasters employed. INTERCOLUMxNriATIONS FOR SACRED AND OTHER PUBLIC EDIFICES, ACCORDING TO VITRUVIUS. The intercolumniation for the Ionic order of six columns in front, should be six modules, or three diameters, from the axis of one column to that of the other ; the centre one being four diameters. In the Corinthian order of eight columns in front, the intercolumniation should be six modules, or three diameters from axis to axis ; the centre one being three diameters and a half In the Ionic order of eight columns in front, the intercolumniation should be three diameters and a quarter from axis to axis; the centre one five dia- meters. The intercolumniation for the Corinthian order of ten columns in front, should be two diameters and a half from axis to axis ; the centre one three diameters. The reason assigned by Vitruvius for making mc PROPOMTIOIf OF PEJ3IMJ31N"T§, J^t4iU:\tdr Fer SiCxr^ten.' f ^rcKitecZtxrxt Dxwacirr hy Jjhiv J3enn'ttt&, Th^ft^ J5t7t-Sfc.-.Ci^(-,_S?,i*?Ti^-'C«.-_l.'^ ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 191 centrfc :ntercolumniation larger tlian the others, ap- pears to he frivolous; as hy it the entire symmetry of an ordonnance is sacrificed, merely to allow of (and that from only a single point of sight) the whole of the aperture of the entrance door being seen. The intercolumniations of the Doric order in Greece are, at the Temple of Theseus at Athens, live modules, six parts, taken to the axis or centre of each column. The portico of the Temple of Minerva at Athens, four modules, and twenty parts. And at the portico of Philip, in the Isle of Delos, seven modules and five parts. The intercolumniations of the Ionic order at Athens are, at the temple on the Ilissus, six modules, fifteen parts. The Temple of Erectheus, five modules ; and at the Temple of Minerva Polias, eight modules. The only principle of taste that can be advanced as regards intercolumniations, is governed by the effects which ought to characterize the compositions in which the columns are employed. PEDIMENTS, ACCORDING TO VITRUVIUS, PLATE XXVL If it be required to crown these intercolumniations with pediments, it is necessary, after having deter- mined the proportion of the entablature, (whether it be a fourth, or between a fourth and a fifth, or a fifth of the height of the columns, or of whatever other proportion it may be,) to divide the space in the 192 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR whole length of the cornice, from the extremity of one cyma to the other, M'hich form the opposite angles, into nine equal parts ; taking one for the height of the tympanum, and placing the height for the cornice above it, observing that the tympanum is measured from the top part of the fillet which covers the small cyma. Between Vitruvius and Scamozzi there exists a medium proportion, which is given by Serlio : it con- sists in taking for a point of centre the half of the space, A, between each extremity of the cyma, form- ing the two two extremities of the cornice, B, markmg it below by intersecting the perpendicular, C, of the centre ; opening the compasses from this point to the extremities of the cymas, B, and describing a segment of a circle, passing through the upper part of the perpendicular line of the centre. The intersection D will give the height of the pediment, the cornice being also included. In conclusion, it may be remarked that the propor- tion of pediments is subordinate to the climate, as well as to the order to which they are applied, and also to the extended or limited dimensions of their base. But as two extreme terms, their height may be varied from one-fourth to one-sixth of the length of their base. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 19? A TABLE OF THE INCLINATION OF PEDIMENTS AND ROOFS, FROM ANTIQUE AND MODERN F.PIPICES. Antique Eililices. Modern Edifices. Degrea* ^ Temple of Miner\-a . . ~ " Krectheus Theseus . . Athens •? Temple of •*'''®°^ S Temple of (^Propylea Portico of Septimus Severus Temple of Concord Tem])le of Mars the Avenger Tem, le of Fortuna Virilis Tem le of the Pantheon Temple of Antonmus and Faustina ' Roof of the Basilica of S. Paolo fuori delle ' niura I Roof of tlie Academy of France, at Rome Roof of the Theatre U'Ar^enliiia 16 15i 15" 14i 23 23* 23i 24 24 24i 23 21V INTERCOLUMNIATIONS, EQUALLY DISTANCED, FOR EDIFICES OF LESS IMPORTANCE, ACCORDING TO VITRUVIUS. Corinthian order of si.x columns in front, five modules, or two diameters and a half, from axis to axis. Ionic order of six columns in front, six modules, or three diameters, from axis to axis. Ionic order of four columns in front, eight modules, or four diameters, from axis to axis. Doric order of four columns in front, ten modules, or five diameters, from axis to axis. Ionic order of four columns in front, six modules and a half from axis to axis; the centre one eigni modules. The Doric intercolumniations are governed by the vision of the tiii^^lyphs. 2 c i^4 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. INTERCOLUMNIATIONS. The plates 27 and 32, fig. A, present the distances which ought to be observed for each order between the axis of the cohimns of porticoes, and those applied to arcades, according to Vignola. Fig. B represents the intercohimniations arranged to one common axis, so as to facilitate their execution, when it is found necessary to employ them in the same facade. The plates 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, and 36, contain the elevations, drawn according to the proportions given in the plans, fig. B, plates 27 and 32. APPLICATION OF COLUMNS TO ARCADES. Arches have been more or less employed in modern architecture, according to the country and the nature of the materials which it furnishes. The difficulty of finding architraves of a single block from column to column, or of supplying it by the artifice of voussoirs, at the decline of the antique architecture, had sug- gested the idea of raising centres upon detached cohimns. Thence, doubtless, may be dated the employment of continued arches, which afterwards became so general in the construction of the interiors of spacious churches ; which require solid supports for the weight of the vaulted ceilings, and materials destined to serve for their covering or roof Rut arches forming arcades, submitted to the pro- portions of, and decorated with, the several orders of architecture, as employed at the exterior of edifices, ~ ■-:n'thia>7 »,'^ - M'Jf -■-.i.Mffi), CORINTKIAU n v^^^! M^-—r--£S£i*-i --^ii ^Z. '—-yM4^-— x\f^ ft ^ ft 31f9 *■ SMfi ■ » -J^y an- - • -r'- v^"^ -.yJW- V Jtt.*- £mJ/> J^iiUiKU Ff JhOn/tn i ^tniOtJli'tl Dvi.t.' •• Ikr*m iWir Afcrx«^#. TtttrnttAttmr Ji^. I -in fnlU.iit trr AOMylM r A-rMXtJb^ia Th- TX'SrAJ?- DRjDT'.Pv, AF.CaDES with COLUM'WS and PE1jESTaL3. F*u»U/\^el Ftr SUUn^t^n s AnMUtZaraZ ^irM^pr ty 7thn 3ma%im^. ITir^m ^m TAssjt^f . I>y Zahj^ DDEin OMBZBK. ^ 'j4 MpJ ^tf part% 411,1.^9 t 3 4 i 6 7 S U M M 21 1^ l4 t' Iti .lf,'Ju/-:i 7/:tk "^ -i.::\A.\'s J?- F lOlTIC OMBZEIR. » J i S 4 ^ i / 3 ,f M) M iM j3 j4 iJ j$ J- j3^t-JtJe^ rrtde^ r%tb.:\4d. Frr HOiJia^; ^TiTutMitUnZ 7y\na»r t;, 'A1..&' C©]R.lKTHIAir OJRlDEm. ■■T-l-i-JudF^BUUn^.-'^ % j'j ki/ 1 34 ZT, 'M#' J !«{/ J « j^ U fe-Jb 3 ■ 3 fi :li' , 3%ra) 3m,Ta«-sa^e .I'atxrTuoslxr liow . i;):e tai 1. 3 dt a td o ok . AT S.IORENZO IN DAX-rASO.AT HOME. -cMil^^MtrM, J.yi-redar ey I3DDR. 1 \ '^^^1 1 ( L J L 1 1 , LJ ^ 1 IJc?®^ 1 1 1 i 1"^ 1: i i! ' 1 r — — ^ 1 '' \ [ = 1 :> \ 1 11' •« 3 ' Mod. 7/i SuL gl. ■ 1 ' 1 ! f Im ATS.LOJlEtsZC IH DA.MAS0,AT RCilZ. 7Z ^rfzUffn. J^izhli^rkMl, J^^- ^TZiiv^lirK' ' J ^rrSrJZe^ucriu, l^vsi^'' ov Tffhn. ^sn^ioeG, IJir££'Tv^^ Fa^^if^lh&^mosScr Ki}v/ X) d:ric d o d k Xmisn. TTiiKskiJ. Tsr 3-aKr^Tm-s .^clalicSir:^ IHraT.^ J,- J^s'k-^ £c7inea>,X)u-a>Tuny:Ba.!. KTC^STIC IDOOjR, ealeoflKedetft' 2L end'Sn Tixh'Uc'h^d' JPffr 4o/i;et W i iSjcet Am. lol. ^ s*«««i?/bi»Jilj4«».it W O 5/i SiA sL «/<- tfiji. 7^ BO'[J)RS,'WII?B'm\"3 ,BA]LI7§T]E1^§ S? :8TUgTICS. n-K,^^t- _Puilui7i.o^^ T^rr 3Ultna!^&w'r -^rc.'hiZeclxinJ/ J>itecZcr "hy Jihn. Scren^ettr. Chirac Tien, ^a>sstufffi,£^-t ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 203 Having been designed for the Cancelleria palace. It would be difficult to imagine any thing more simple or better arranged than this example ; which offers nothing forced, all the parts of its composition appear- ing naturally placed. The order which forms its decoration is taken from his denticulated Doric. The continuation of the astragal between one column and the other, gives a finish to the horizontal architrave, that produces a good effect. The door of S. Lorenzo, in Damaso, pis. 43 and 44, may be considered as forming the principal entrance of an edifice, and is a valuable model of its kind. All its proportions are well preserved, and in good relation with each other ; and it is susceptible of being enriched by the application of ornaments to its mouldings, according to the character of the edifice to which it is intended to be applied. The door of the saloon of t'arnese palace, pis. 45 and 46, offers the same excellences as the foregoing example ; with this difference, that the former was intended for exterior, the latter for interior decoration ; having the general and detailed proportion of their parts regulated accordingly. OF WINDOWS. Of all the parts of an edifice, the windows have the most immediate relation with the interior distribution. To disregard all but external decoration, and to neglect the relation which ought to exist between the 204 archite:ctural director. exterior and interior of an edifice, would at best pro- duce a very defective structure. The first duty being to satisfy the laws of symmetry, the windows, which form a part in the regular ordonnance at the exterior, should be conformable to the interior of each apart- ment ; so that the piers be of an equal proportion, and the spaces be symmetrical and corresponding in the saloons, apartments, cabinets, &c. Without this discri- mination, the art of distribution, and also that of architecture, would return to that state of infancy and barbarism, which characterizes the edifices erected from the fourth to the fifteenth century ; during which period light was admitted into the difierent apartments through apertures, the distribution of which did not bear the least external relation to each other. As symmetry at the present day holds its due rank in the ordonnance of buildings and edifices, distribu- tion has become an art that requires the highest degree of judgment in those who wish to profit by all the resources of which the art is capable. It is not suffi- cient to observe that all the windows be placed per- pendicularly over each other, but that there also exist a relation of proportion between them. It is for this reason that in buildings of any importance, blank or imitation windows are often employed, above, below, at the side, or directly opposite those which are loiown to be necessary ; in order to preserve the laws of symmetry in the exterior of their fa9ades. Vitruvius, Palladio, Scamozzi, and many other architects, have variously treated the proportions of windows. Their opinions must necessarily differ, according to the custom of the countries treated on in their writings. Nothing effectively admits of greater variety, accord- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 205 ing to the climate, degree of temperature, duration of light, purity of the atmosphere, commercial occupa- tions, customs, and the wants of society, than the aper- tures bv which lio;ht is admitted into the interior of apartments. In warm climates, windows are few in number, and small in their dimensions. According as we advance towards those countries where the sun has less power, and the winter season is of longer duration, it may be remarked, that the windows are employed so as to derive all possible advantage from the light. If windows are, of all the parts of edifices, those which are the most governed by the laws of necessity, it is no less certain, that notwithstanding these impe- rious reasons, they are also susceptible of receiving from the art the most harmonious relations. An edifice may be considered exteriorly as a com- position of planes and apertures, independently of the wants and conveniences of the interior. There are some laws prescribed by solidity, and others that propriety and a perfect accord of the parts, render evident to all who are exercised in the research of this description of beauty. For example, solidity prescribes that the piers between windows be at least equal to the breadth of their aperture. In countries where it is customary to give to piers but one- half or one-third of the breadth of the opening of the window, it must be evident, from the aperture exceeding the plane, that the con- struction must be weakened ; and consequently the buildings must require more frequent repairs. In other countries, where it is customary to give to piers twice the width of the aperture of the windows, the 206 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. houses present a massive and serious appearance, which is inconsistent with their character. For good effect in architecture, it is, however, better to fall into the last-mentioned excess than the former. The greatest evil in all constructions is a want of solidity, and the appearance alone of this defect is almost as great a fault as when it exists in reality. The medium term for the proportion of windows consists in giving them twice the width of their aper- ture in height, as in pi. 50, fig. 1 ; where the breadth of the antepagmenta, or architrave, is a fifth, and may be employed from this to a sixth of the width of the aperture. The height of the entablature, from the soflSt of the architrave to the upper fillet of the cyma in the cornice, may be from one-third to one-fourth of the height of the aperture. The architrave and frieze should be equal in their height ; and the cornice may be augmented one-fifth or one-sixth, but rarely one-fourth more than the height of the two other members, according as it may be judged neces- sary for its character and effect. This rule has generally been adopted in the most celebrated edifices at Rome and Florence. These proportions, however, vary according to the nature of the stories. Windows of the ground story are generally reduced an eighth part less in their height than double their width ; whilst those of the superior story receive an eighth, and sometimes two, more than the lower story ; and the heights of the windows in the stories above gradually decrease according to the width of their apertures. In the distribution of windows in the parts in advance, and those in retreat of a facade, it ought ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 207 always to be observed, that one should occupy the centre, or that they be of an uneven number ; it being much more consistent for an aperture to be in the centre of the different divisions of all facades than a pier. Notwithstanding the examples in which this rule has been neglected, it ought in general to be regarded as inviolable ; except in private dwellings, where the total is subordinated to the irregularity of the site, and the necessary wants and conveniences, which renders it impossible to follow the rules of an exact symmetry. The distribution of windows is not confined only to the relation of the horizontal position of their ordon- nance in a story ; there is another relation no less important, which is that which regulates their intervals and correspondence from one story to another. As an edifice is displeasing to the sight in which there is too great a portion of aperture, or when the open- ings exceed the surface of the piers ; so in like manner it is repugnant to solidity, and also to correct taste, to separate the stories only by a trivial intervening space. There ought to exist between the inferior and superior stories, a space which indicates not only the thickness of the floor, but likewise a space necessary to make the sill of the window serve as an easy support. In this respect, the windows which have their sill as high as it is convenient in the interior of an edifice, give to the exterior a more happy distribution. This part of architecture, however, is subordinate to the manners of the nation in which it is employed. Win- dows amongst the ancients only served to admit light into their apartments, and not to render the view into the street their principal object; therefore the inter- 208 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. vening height of the space between the head of one window to the sill of the window immediately above it, was very considerable. Nothing can be more favourable to good effect in architecture than this: whether the walls be plain, or decorated with an ordonnance of columns or pilasters. It is impossible to give precise rules for the distri- bution of windows in the interior of apartments. The only one is to follow symmetry. By this is meant the most exact correspondence between the intervals or piers which separate the windows, as also their uniform repetition in such apartments as occupy the whole breadth of a building. The principal difference in the forms of windows, consists in the diversity of their apertures : amongst which are those which serve as doors, and those that Serve only as windows. 1'he first are employed in the ground story, and have ordinarily the form of arcades ; though sometimes they are employed with horizontal or straight heads. Of the second description, or those which serve as windows only, there are three kinds ; namely, those with semicircular heads, those that have their soffit or head straight, and those in which it forms the segment of a circle. Semicircular windows are only employed with success in large masses of buildings, of which the edifices at Florence present us many fine examples. They are also often employed in churches that require very large apertures. Windows with straight heads are those most gene- rally used; being the least expensive in their con- struction. (^See pis. 50, fig. 1, and pis. 47 and 48.) ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 209 Segmental windows are the least elegant in their form, being an equivocal medium between the two former. Semicircular-headed windows, when employed in the ground story, often serve also as doors. They are generally employed to admit light into vestibules, and at the same time to serve as their entrance ; as also in laige saloons, galleries, or any other extensive apart- ment. Those that are placed at the exterior of a fa9ade, whose decoration requires the same ordonnance, ought to correspond in their base or plan with the arcades that ornament the other parts of the edifice. (^See, for the respective proportions of the arcades belonging to each of the orders, when employed without pedestals, pis. 27, 28, 29 30, and 31.) This description of windows may likevvise be employed in the second story of an edifice ; in which case the columns forming their decoration, if any be employed, may have pedestals, and the intervening spaces be occupied by balusters. (^See arcades with columns and pedestals, pis. 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36 ; their impost and archivolts, pi. 37 ; and the balusters, pi. 50 ; fig. 5 and 6.) When the dimensions of some of the apartments in such buildings do not require or admit of openings so large as those of the aperture of the arcades, these latter are feint, leaving such a proportion of aperture as is necessary for the admission of the light required in the interior. If the form of the head of the window so situated be semicircular, it ought to have the same point of centre as the arch of the arcade; if it be straight, and employed with a cornice, the upper member of the cornice ought to be equal in height to 2£ 210 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. that of the impost; if the aperture be plain, it ought likewise to extend to the height above-mentioned. To proportion these windows to their restricted width, it is necessary to raise them upon a plain continued pedestal, bahistrade, or elevated string-course ; the feint arcade being employed only when essential to the symmetry of the general ordonnance of the rest of the facade. Mezzaninas are stories of low dimensions, employed in Italy, and generally placed betvveen two loftier ones ; sometimes between the ground and second story, and at others between the second and third story, which serve as small apartments for winter, for wardrobes, or as chambers for servants. The part where these can be employed with the greatest pro- priety, which in other respects are generally to be condemned, is in the basement story, when it is not intended to be employed for any particular purposes; as also in different situations in commercial building's, and private habitations of less importance. Light is admitted into this description of rooms by means of small square windows, (^see pi. 50, fig. 3,) whose apertures are equal in width and height, and divided into six parts, one of which determines the breadth of the architrave. If an architect be not always at liberty to appro- priate the form, proportion, and disfX)sition of windows, to the general character of the ordonnance of an edifice, this is not the case with regard to their deco- ration. There are many degrees of character, from the naked window finishing with the face of the wall, to that where the architrave is employed, on the mouldings of which are sculptured the richest orna- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR 2ii ments. Windows without architraves ought ne\er to be employed but in private houses, where architecture and art are no way connected; or in such extremely simple parts of edifices as do not admit of embellish- ment. It is in the degree of richness or simplicity of the architraves of windows that means may be found, which will conduce to give to edifices the particular expression that marks their uses. The Doric order, in presenting a masculine cha- racter repugnant to all delicacy of decoration, does not necessarily demand a total exclusion of ornament. Harmony requires that all edifices which present this expression, be accompanied in the different parts which enter into the ordonnance, by profiles and orna- ments exhibiting a similar character. Many exam- ples present themselves in the Florentine architecture, that may be proposed as models for this description of windows. The manner of decorating windows after the rustic style of'ordonnance, consists in surrounding them with bossages or rustics, of more or less projection, rough- ness, &c., according to the degree of strength or rusticity required to be expressed in the general mass. The edifices of Tuscany present imposing and almost terrifying models of this style ; which can rarely be judiciously employed, and only in extensive edifices; on which occasions, if an ordonnance of cohimns is employed, the architraves of the windows ought to be plain and unbroken, and to present a character of strength consistent with the style adopted. The Ionic architraves ouo'ht to exhibit more elegance than richness, and to follow a progression of form, as also of ornament. Windows of the Ionic ordonnance 212 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. may present an entablature without pediment. (^See pi. 47.) All the delicacy and richness of form, proportion^ and decoration, are reserved for the windows of the Corinthian ordonnance, as in pi. 48; which pre- sents an example decorated with an entablature and pediment, supported by columns, having composed Corinthian capitals. The pediment may be traced as in pi. 50, fig. 4 ; by taking for a centre the point C, which is half the distance between each extremity of the cyma, MN, intersecting the vertical line below at F, with a radius of CM ; afterwards placing the point of the compasses at F, and extending them to M, describe the arc MN, whose intersection at D will determine its height; or, according to the method given by Vitruvius, by dividing the whole length between the two extremities of the pediment into nine equal parts, and taking one of these divisions for the height of the tympanum. (^See pi. 26.) For nume- rous examples of the form, proportion, and decoration of windows, see the different elevations and sections, commencing with pi. f56. OF BALUSTERS. There are no examples of the employment of ba- lusters amongst the ancients. Their origin can only be assigned to the different fences or parapets executed in wood, and employed in situations not requiring other or more expensive materials. Modern architec- VV'J^V .\J U \\' PIJ7 OF FaRHESE ?AT_A.CE in the rACAUE FK0!ITIN3TH CAUE f: »jrfrf«';«^ -7i>-, 7uiu.Jui /> j^jiutfU,. ■■ >trju,,aiu^ i>v-M2>' }> ^'«/> .Smu>««'. rv>^ ^//t ru. i^riiri&ow. l±SJJt I , I I . . C; THESSCCWIi SIOEOfOF FAKNESE PA.I.AC l.mim rmtU:\ti Tr^ TiiOtn^C^ , ^^.JnO.JU'^ ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 2] 3 ture has not only adopted and imitated these forms in stone and marble, but has likewise given to each different proportions, according to those of the order, which they are intended to accompany. The earliest productions of balusters are those exe- cuted at Florence, and a few other cities in Italy; which take their date from the first centuries of the restoration of the arts, and represent small columns. This method, though puerile, is perhaps better than that which custom appears to have confirmed. Modern balusters present no other reason for their peculiar forms than caprice. Balusters are ordinarily a species of column, occu- pying the place of the die in a continued pedestal, composed of three principal parts, a capital, shaft, and base ; which, when placed upon a socle, and sur- mounted with a cornice, forms what is termed a balustrade. Balusters, as also balustrades, should partake of the character of the edifice in which tliey are employed. They are best situated when placed between the sides of the apertures of arcades, above the ground story, or between the pedestals of a range of cohimns forming a gallery ; in balconies, staircases of important edilices, enclosures for altars, thrones, state-beds, &c. ; and not upon the entablature of buildings or edifices, except when their roof is con- structed in the form of a terrace. Balusters should be of an even number, never ad- mitting tlie half of a baluster at the extremities of each range ; and the distance which separates them be- tween their greatest diameter should be equal to one- half of that diameter, so that the aperture may be equal to the plane. There are five species of balus- 214 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. trades : the socle of the Tuscan is plain, and the cor- nice is an even face, surmounted with a fillet ; its baluster is massive in its proportions, and has few mouldino:s. The Doric is lis-hter and more ornament- ed ; and the other three species present a similar gra- dation. The proportions and mouldings of the cornice and socle are governed by those of the pedestals of the different orders. To find the general heights of balusters, divide the die of the pedestal, which will be the height of the baluster, into five parts, one of which will give that of its base, dividing the remaining four parts into five, one of which will determine that of the capital. Again divide the space between the capital and base into five other parts, three of which will give the height of the neck, and two that of the swell. The plinth should be one-third of the height of the base, and the abacus one-third of that of the capital. These are the general proportions common to the five species of balusters; the number of their mouldings, their ex- pression, the outline or swell of their shafts, the ele- gance or strength of their forms, being governed by the order to which they belong. The Tuscan balus- ter is of the greatest diameter, has the least number of mouldings, and is generally square in its plan. Its height is divided into five parts, two of which are given for the diameter of its swell. As the Corinthian baluster ought to present a degree of elegance, its greater diameter is but a third of its height ; the Doric, Ionic, and Composite balusters, have the same com- parative proportion. For example, if the height of the baluster be divided into sixty parts, the greatest diameter or swell of the Tuscan should be twenty- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 215 four of these parts; that of the Doric twenty-three; that of the Ionic twenty-two ; and those of the Corin- thian and Composite twenty-one. Each of these diameters should be divided into two equal parts, one of which will give the diameter of the collarin of the capital, scotia of the base, and the lesser diameter, or upper part of the shaft ; that of the plinth of the base is equal to the greater diameter of the shaft, and the abacus of the capital one-fifth or one-sixth part less. In the employment of balustrades to principal stair- cases, care should be taken always to preserve the horizontal position of the mouldings of the balusters, making the inclination, caused by the stairs, in the heighth of the plinth of the base and the abacus of the capital. As to the number of balusters that should be employed between any two solids or planes, namely, between pedestals and sides of apertures, it should never exceed twelve, nor be less than four. The figures 5 and 6, pi. 50, may serve in some degree to illustrate the general expression of the two extremes in balusters, that of strength and lightness. For ex- amples of their employment and form, see the dif- ferent elevations and sections which follow. OF NICHES. The employment of niches, when considered as to their primitive form, is of the highest antiquity ; but their employment as an object in architectural deco- ration is much less ancient. The Greeks gave tne first proportion to niches, according to their situation, 216 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. at the exterior or interior of edifices. They intro- duced statues in characterizing the different edifices ; and the employment of niches in architectural decora- tion very naturally followed. The proportions of their statues determined those of the niches ; which were, however, subjected to the order and ornaments of the edifices in which they were employed. There can be few examples of niches cited amongst the existing remains of Greece. In their temples the statues were colossal, and placed at the extremity of the cella ; being insulated, as at the temple of Jupiter Olympus, and that of Minerva, at Athens. Amongst the exam- ples of niches presented in different edifices, there are some which are square, as at the choragic monument of Thrasyllus, and likewise at the monument of Philo- papus ; where there are one circular and two quad- rangular niches, which are still ornamented with statues. But if we had not these references, as proofs of the employment of niches in the antique edifices, there could be nothing adduced against their exten- sive employment, from the number of those discovered amongst the existing remains, erected at a certain epoch, being small ; as all the edifices of Greece, such as the Gymnasii, Agorai, Stadia, &c., as also all the magnificent productions belonging to private indivi- duals, have perished. Those examples presented in the remains of the antique edifices, erected in the Roman empire in the most flourishing centuries of the art, and for the greater part by Grecian artists, will serve as proofs of the manner in which niches were employed by the ancients, of which there are two Kinds. The first serve for the placing of statues ; the second are destined to different uses, as the exedrce, ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 217 or hollow spaces of greater or less dimension, of a square or semicircular form, in walls of a considerable extent. The first are situated in temples, saloons, and basilicas, between the intercolumniations of por- ticoes, and in plain walls ; being' generally about seven feet in height, so as to contain a statue the size of life, as those at the temple of Mars the Avenger. This is the most suitable dimension, since it serves as a scaJe of comparison to judge of the exact dimensions of the edifice. Niches of this size were often em- ployed in the interior of temples, when constructed of brick, as at the temple of the forum of iVntoninus, and that of Venus, at Rome ; together with a great number of other constructions of brick, where this description of niche has been adopted, both at Rome in the thermae, and of Tivoli, in the private buildings of the villa of Adrian. Of this first kind of niche there were both round and s^i«Jlare ; when they were square in their plan, they weie'^ square also in their elevation; as likewise when they presented a semi- circular plan, their elevation terminai^ed in the same manner. Sometimes they were without U^rA',?ments, at others decorated with architraves, as at the arch of Janus: they were also employed with columns and pediments, as at the Pantheon and thermae, and also at a temple at Nismes, generally named that of Diana. The interior of this edifice has its two sides decorated with six Corinthian columns engaged in the walls. Each intercolumniation is occupied by a niche, placed upon a stylobate, and ornamented with an arcliitrave, formed by two pilasters tliat support an entablature with a pediment; presenting one of the most beau- tiful models of its kind with which antiquity has 2 F 218 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. furnished us. {See pi. 49.) At other times, when employed with columns which were situated at too great a height to admit of pedestals, the columns were placed upon consoles, as at the thermse of Dioclesian, and at the facade of t'le Temple of Peace. The second kind of niche is of large dimensions, having the pavement for its base. It is employed at the exterior of edifices, to contain groups of figures, or colossal statues ; as those under the portico of the Pantheon at Rome. Others of this descrifjtion, though of still greater dimensions, were sometimies placed at the extremity, in the interior of templ/es, for the re- ception of colossal figures ; as at t\ie cella of the temple of Venus at Rome ; and at /Other times in the basilicas, to contain the seats of tire tribunal, as at the misnamed Temple of Peace ; ''which Constantine em- ployed as a basilica; and .-in the basilica at Pompeii. In these last instances, it is named the chalcidicum. Those presented in *{\\q saloons of the thermae were surrounded by se^ts, for ease and conversation ; ex- amples of whichi may be found in the different thermae, and in sp\^j2;1 saloons at the villa of Adrian, and are distinguished by the term exedrse. Lastly, niches of greater dimensions than the preceding were con- structed in the walls which served as inclosures for the thermae, answering as abutments : some were semi- circular, others square in their plan ; and were often employed alternately. When their dimension was very considerable, they were left open at the top, and contained many rows of seats placed above each other, serving as amphitheatres for the delivery of public discourses, or the exhibition of particular o-ames; examples of which may be seen at the ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 219 tnermae Caracalla and Dioclesian: this kind of niche is also termed exedra. They were also employed in Greece, in the inclosures surrounding the temples, as at the temple of Jupiter Olympus, repaired by Adrian ; which presents niches of this description, some of which are square and others semicircular in their plan, and are placed alternately. Their front was decorated with columns, and their summit presented a covering of wood; their dimensions not being great, and the soffit was divided into compartments, and ornamented with paintings. The antique examples above cited furnish models of each of the different kinds of niches; and what has been said will doubtless show what character they ought to bear, according to the nature of the edifice in which they are to be employed. This cha- racter ought to be governed by the same judgment which presides in determining the form and decoration of doors and windows; not as regards utility, but as decorative objects entering into the ordonnance of the same edifice. Of those amongst the first kind mentioned in this article, employed by the moderns, there are three classes. The first expresses strength and simplicity, the third delicacy and richness, and the second the medium : their form, in their plan and elevation, is either quadrangular or semicircular. The first is without any decoration ; the second class is orna- mented with an archivolt; and the third class com- prehends that which is ornamented with an entabla- ture and pediment supported by two columns. This classification of niches is similar to that of all the other parts of architecture, expressing three dis- 220 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. tinct characters corresponding to each of the orders. Each of these niches ought to be of a proportion con- sistent with the ordonnance to which they relate ; which is alone determined by judgment. It has in vain been attempted by many authors to determine the invariable proportion of niches, as also the other parts of architecture, without success. 1 he general rule given for the proportion of niches is twice and a half their width in height ; but the particular rule is, to divide the width of each of the three classes of niches into twelve parts, giving twenty-eight of these divisions in height to the first, thirty to the second, and thirty-one to the third. This determination of the proportions of niches, like those of the orders and the other parts of an ordonnance, are only a species of medium terms, established to serve as approximate measures to the combinations of the artist. For ex- amples of their employment, see the different plates of plans, elevations, and sections, which follow. OF CROWNING ENTABLATURES. The expression of character, suitable to each edi- fice, is greatly aided by tlie entablature. This ex- pression may be given in two ways ; namely, by the details of the modinature, and by the choice of the ornaments. The details of the modinature are what are termed the profiles ; and by the combination of these profiles, their number, greater or less projection, strength or lightness, a solemn or gay, light or strong, * simple or composed character, may be produced. It ITICHE M? %:-\' ■^K. " .i!-V'-ml. 7«>U« 7S>«i.ik>£ /'V l,aim*m ' .^tlMfcW J>» ^ ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 221 is from these details of the ordonnance that the con- noisseur, in part, forms his judgment of the ability of the architect. No part of architecture is capable of receiving such variety in the application of ornaments. Their union with the profiles, and the due proportion of richness and repose that ought to be observed accord- ing to the nature of each edifice, is but rarely to be met with. The principal mansions of Italy are almost all crowned with sumptuous and magnificent enta- blatures; yet amongst this great number, two only have become classic ; namely, that of Strozzi palace, at Florence, and that of Farnese palace, at Rome. (^See pi. 39.) The entablature, pi. 38, given by Vignola, the proportion of which is the eleventh part of the whole height of the elevation, is well adapte(/ for crowning an extensive facade. Its total, partak ing of the Doric and Corinthian, is judiciously com- bined ; and it will bear enriching or simplifying with equal propriety, according to the employment to which it may be destined. But care must be taken not to support it with columns. It is too rich for the Doric, and of too great strength for the Corinthian ; and not proper for orders to which their own entabla- tures are alone suitable, or others which are analo- gous and well combined. It is not always judicious to follow step by step the compositions of authors, although they may have been adopted and acknow- ledged as classical. Tlie ancients did not slavishly copy even the most esteemed examples ; that which was acknowledged as beautiful and perfect, was sometimes repeated, but never in a servile maimer. The mechanical method often adopted to determine the proportions of crowning members for ordinary 222 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. buildings, in which neither columns nor pilasters are employed, is to divide the total height from the line of base to the level of the ceiling of the uppermost story into about eight parts, giving one of these for the height of the entablature ; but when it is intended to suppress the architrave, the last division is subdivided into five, two of which are given for the cornice, and the half of the remaining three for the frieze ; and likewise when the cornice alone is employed, the same practice is followed in the subdivisions, two of which are given for its height. OF THE FORM AND PROPORTION OF THE INTERIORS OF BUILDINGS AND EDIFICES. The general forms and proportions assigned by modern authors to the different apartments are, that the forms of spacious cabinets, dining, drawing, and ball-rooms, be rectangular ; and that their length be equal to the diagonal of a square formed on their breadth ; whilst those of saloons may be square, cir- cular, elliptical, or octagonal. The proportions of great galleries and extensive libraries may extend from four to seven times their breadth in length. The general height of apartments is given by taking one-half of their length and breadth ; for those of galleries and libraries of considerable length, once and a half their breadth. The proportions of stair- cases and passages or corridors (the breadth of the latter may be from one-third to one-fourth of that of the principal rooms) are determined by the extent c Row:^ IW-& E :^ tab il at ur e . r : S; 1 ^\ ■ /: p "S^SSSS^U^lPSSL ^JSS^JjS^^SOSiiSoT^il^JXiJ^ TjasaJS^cga^j^i^Ko-;: ^os®&MX^>pm;^'£^ WAJiWW^Sii f t ..La..j y^'i 1 ' 1 1 « CjROWliTIITfGr E:^TAB]LATX^Ii:E FI.S9. -/- !>■' ^'i- (^^i L'**d*i* ^m^tt^*d r«* aa»Li^f»'%'j ^rabU»*tue»l Dt ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 223 of the buildings and apartments; it being essential in architecture, always to observe a strict relation between the parts and the total. The height of the chambers on the second story are, according to the common methods, made about one- twelfth part less than that of the rooms below; and the height of a third story three-fourths of that of the second. As all the rooms of the same story are com- monly of an equal height, while convenience requires them to be of different lengths and breadths ; the proper relation between their height and the other dimensions cannot always be preserved without addi- tional expense. Where this is not an obstacle, the height of the story may be governed by that of the prin- cipal rooms ; while the proportions of the lesser rooms may be regulated, and their appearance improved, by means of coved and flat, groined, arched, or vaulted ceilings. Vitruvius gives three diiferent rules for the propor- tion of vestibules. The first consists in dividins; the length of the vestibule into five parts, three of which are given for the breadth ; the second into three parts, giving two for the breadth ; and the third in taking the diagonal of a square for its length, whose side is equal to the breadth of the vestibule. Their heiji'ht is less by a fourth part than their length. The pteromata (a range of columns at each side of the vestibule, leaving a passage between them and the wall,) situated on the rioht and left, should have in breadth, if the length of the vestibule be from thirty to forty feet, each a sixth part of its length ; if it he from forty to fifty feet, a .seventh part ; if from fifly to sixty feet, an eighth part ; if from si.^ty to 224 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. eighty, a ninth part ; and lastly, if from eighty to one hundred feet, each one-tenth part of its length for their breadth. The architrave placed upon the columns forming these passages should be of such an elevation as to make the height equal to the breadth. The intercolumniations should not be less than three diameters, nor more than four. If the Doric order be employed, they are governed by triglyphs. The tablinum, or cabinet, should be, if the width of the vestibule be twenty feet, of two-thirds of that dimension; if it be from thirty to forty, one-half; and if from forty to fifty feet, the proportion of the cabinet should be two-fifths of the width of the vestibule. The height of the cabinet should be an eighth part more than its width. The principal entrance of the least vestibules, should be two-thirds of the width of the cabinet, and that of the large vestibules one-half of the same width. The triclinia, or dining-rooms, the ceci, or banquet- ing-rooms, and the exedrae, or drawing-rooms, should have double their breadth in length, and their height should be equal to half of their length and breadth taken together. The pinacotheca, or picture-gallery, like the drav/ing-room, should be spacious,. The oeci, or Corinthian, and the tetrastyle, or Egyptian apartments, though of similar proportions to those prescribed for dining rooms, should be of great di- mensions, on account of the columns employed. The Corinthian and Egyptian apartments differ from each other, by the Corinthian having but one order of columns placed upon a pedestal, or otherwise upon the pavement, and supporting their architrave and cor- nice of wood, or coated with stucco ; above which is an ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 225 arched ceiling. But the Egyptian apartments have an architrave upon their cokimns, and above the architrave is a floor, which extends from the columns to the wall. This floor is constructed in such a manner as to form an open terrace around the whole. Above the architrave, and perpendicularly over these columns, others are placed, whose height is less by a fourth part than those beneath them. There is an archi- trave, with other ornaments, upon the upper range of columns ; and the roof has a straight ceiling. Be- tween the upper range of columns are windows, which give to it the appearance of a basilica, and this constitutes the diff'erence between the Egyptian and the Corinthian apartments. The Greeks, adds Vitruvius, have a room which they name Cyzicene. It has a northern aspect, with a door in the centre, and is surrounded by gardens. Its length and breadth should be suflScient for the convenience of placing two tables in opposite but similar situations to each other. On the right and left are windows in form of doors, for the accommo- dation of enjoying the exterior aspect. Its height is once and a half its breadth. Thus the cyzicene of the Greeks answered the same purposes as the tric- linium of the Romans. It would be diiflcult to assign, even to the most ex- tensive and remarkable rooms in modern architecture, either particular forms or a general character, which would furnish the basis for a theory of a detailed description. Palladio states, that the most elegant forms for apartments and rooms are seven in number ; namely, 2 G 2*26 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the round, which are the most rare ; the square ; those whose length is equal to the diagonal of the square formed upon their breadth ; those of a square and a third ; a square and a half; a square and two- thirds ; and lastly, of two squares ; and that the best proportion for the height of these -different apart- ments, when they have flat ceilings, is in giving their breadth for their height. But if those which are square in their plan be terminated by semicircular or vaulted ceilings, they should have one-third more than their breadth to the key of the arch ; and the height of those whose length is greater than their breadth is given by adding the length to the breadth, and taking the half. Scamozzi observes, that the ancients made their apartments square, or otherwise twice their breadth in length, and that their general heighth at the least was their breadth ; or, at the most, the half of the length and breadth together. The following are the five different proportions which he proposes for apart- ments. The first, says he, are square ; the second have once and a quarter their breadth in length; the third, once and a half; the fourth, once and three- quarters; and the fifth, twice their breadth in length. For the height of the first, he prescribes their breadth ; to the second, an eighth more than their breadth ; to the third, a fourth ; to the fourth, three-eighths more than their breadth ; and to the fifth, once and a half their breadth ; and he further adds, that the first, or ground-story, ought to have the greatest elevation, which agrees with the opinion of Palladio, who says, that each story ought to have a sixth less in height than that immediately below it. iiRCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 227 OF DISTRIBUTION, One of the most important parts of architecture, the aim of which is to render its various productions healtliful, convenient, and agreeable, consists injudi- cious distribution. This branch of the art, as prac- tised by the ancients, is that of all others, of which we have the least knowledge. Private habitations are not constructions of a nature capable of surviving the overthrow and revolutions which destroy cities. Was it not for the discoveries made of the cities buried by the eruptions of Vesuvius, our knowledge would be confined to the obscure and problematic descriptions given by a few writers of antiquity. The small number, and the state of preservation of those houses which have been discovered, have, however, tended to throw but little lio'ht on the distribution of interiors. Nothing is more subordinate to domestic customs and habits than this part of architecture. What is remarked in the plans of these houses is, a very simple and almost uniform distribution. At the villa of Pompeii, however, the studied and skilful application of ornaments, and the judicious distribu- tion of offices and interior conveniences, make it pre- sumable that this part of comfort and pleasure must have been carried to a great extent, both in town and country houses belonging to wealthy individuals. Modern artists concur in the probability of this conjecture, from an examination made of the plans of the villa of Adrian, at Tivoli. The apartments are distributed with the greatest art ; the baths, and all the other conveniences, arc arranged in the most 228 AUCIIITECTURAL DIRECTOR. diligent and able manner; those rooms which were of a large dimension were li<5hted in a manner very appropriate to the climate ; and with great art accom- modated to the djnereiit hours cf the day during which they were employed. These shapeless ruins prove to us, that the art of distribution, and the luxury of conveniences, were carried to the greatest extent in the Roman empire. Vitruvius, treating on this subject, c. 7, b. 6, makes the following observations. The winter triclinium, or dining-room, and the bath, should be situated oppo- site to the winter's declining sun, because its light is there useful; besides, the western sun shining thereon, produces heat, and makes the aspect warm and pleasant in the evening. Bed-chambers and libra- ries should face the east, for in these the morning light is required ; it is also necessary in order that the books in libraries may not decay, for in those that are situated to the south and west they will be damaged by the damp and by the worms which the humid winds generate and nourish. The rooms destined to be employed during spring and autumn, should face the east ; for the windows being then turned from the sun, proceeding westward, render those apartments temperate at the time they are generally employed. The summer dining-room should be situ- ated towards the north, because this aspect is not, like the others, rendered hot at the summer solstice ; for being turned from the course of the sun, it remains always cool, and when used, is salubrious and plea- sant. The same aspect is also the most proper for the pinacotheca, or picture-rooms or galleries, on ac- count of the equality of light. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 229 The most general observations, as regards aspects in our own country, are, that the south-east is the most esteemed ; and that the south and due east rank next. Again, the south-west is regarded as the most objectionable, because the rains proceed more from that point than from any other. An aspect due north or west, has equally a disadvantage ; the former from being deprived of the sun, and the latter by being incommoded with it, during a considerable portion of the day. Distribution is intimately connected with the cli- mate, customs, social habits, and the precedents of ostentation and vanity; and if these differ in each age and nation, it is difficult to conceive how this part of architecture can be submitted to rule, or any positive examples be proposed. One point only can be agreed upon, which is conveniency ; as this doubtless consti- tutes the base of distribution. Nevertheless, even conveniency is local and dependent on habit ; which differing every where, mu^t necessarily produce dif- ferent results. A summary of the different opinions of those who have treated on this subject, more particularly as re- gards residences, is contained in the following general remarks. A building ought to present itself in an advanta- geous manner, and have a good entrance. The best situation for the body of the house, is between (if it is intended that there should be each of these) the court and garden. The offices and stahles should be placed in such a manner that the apartments may not be incommoded ; which may be avoided by placing them so as to range 230 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. with each side of the court. One of these sides, that on which the offices are placed, should be connected by a passage or vestibule that leads to the dining- room ; in order that the service of the table may be conveniently attended to. Irregularity in the forms of the different rooms or apartments should be avoided : it ought only to be permitted when its application to some detailed part may procure a greater space or more desirable situa- tion to any of the principal apartments. When, in a spacious mansion, it is intended to form an extensive range of apartments, it is necessary to avoid placing any rooms destined for the use of servants in the same range. In interior as in exterior distribution, symmetry ought generally to be observed, except in some cases of interior distribution ; on which occasions the neces- sary relation of the opposite sides should be judi- ciously arranged. It is an indispensable rule, that the interior distribu- tion accord with the exterior decoration. In concluding this subject, which, as before re- marked, forms one of the most important parts of architecture, it may not be superfluous to offer some further observations. If a vestibule, gallery, or any other part, present itself at the entrance of a house or edifice of more than one story, the staircase ought to be conspicuously situated, and the distribution of each story should be so judiciously conceived and arranged, that the landing may afford the greatest facility to each principal or private room or apartment. But as this subject will not admit of a detailed indication, it is necessary, before forming plans of the distribution ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 231 of either public or private edifices or buildings, to ascertain the particulars of all that is required, the general and detailed relations of locality ; and of the situation, ^vhich is no less essential, so as to profit by the different prospects that may present themselves from the interior, as also for the aspect of the exterior. For a judicious composition of a plan cannot be ex- pected to result from an inaccurate knowledge of the desired conveniences, or an inadequate study of the advantages or disadvantages of the site. To effect this desirable end, no design should be attempted without previously forming a correct and detailed memorandum of all the exigencies. OF DOMES. Before proceeding to pass any observations on the nature and employment of the dome, it will, perhaps, be necessary to give a history of the form and appli- cation to which the arch was subjected amongst the ancients, and afterwards that which it presents in the middle ages ; and lastly, the differences it underwent, in its form and application, on its introduction into modern architecture. The generality of writers who have visited Egypt, agree as to there being no indication of a real arch amongst the constructions of that country. There are, however, many examples that present a kind of essay or rude attempt at this method of construction. In the pyramids are found a species of raised ceilings, vvhich terminate in a point by means of stones, which 232 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. are laid flat, and project the one over the other. The uppermost, or centre stone, instead of forming a key, that is to say, being dressed conically, is laid flat upon the others, without forming any stay whatever to the superior part of the masonry. All the different erections of the same period, which present this form in their construction, offer the same arrangements. Pliny, in speaking of the repairs which the subter- rains of the labyrinth had undergone, employs the word fornex, which is applicable to straight ceilings. The remains of a bridge over a canal leading to Coptos, exhibits flat stones of considerable length, extended from one pier to th^ other. Those disco- vered by Pocock, are of a date posterior to the ar- rival of the Greeks in that country; and the arch spoken of by Lucus, was erected at the decline of the Roman empire. As the climate of Egypt accorded well with the early custom of forming excavations, and subterra- neous constructions, so likewise it was very favourable to those which were afterwards erected in imitation of the same type and slyle. The employment of flat coverings is also justified by the absence of rain, which is substituted by the periodical overflow of the Nile. In constructing the coverings of galleries, slabs of stone were used ; extending in one piece from the columns to the wall. The temples do not appear to have been composed of interiors requiring immense coverings ; and, indeed, independent of the practices which were already established, the scarcity of wood in this country must have prevented its extensive employment in their edifices. The inclined carpentry, on the contrary, with which ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 283 the constructions of Greece were surmounted, gave rise to the pediment ; and in like manner the arched covering was suggested by the roof. Hence we may account for their absence in Egypt. In the last-men- tioned country, the soffits of the ceilings present only a smooth surface, without indication, as in Greece, of the framing of the carpentry producing compartments. This indication of the employment of wood particu- larly characterizes this part of tlie Grecian architec- ture. Its absence sufficiently proves that of the material in the model of the Egyptian architecture. Carpentry affords simple and economical means of uniting; under one coverins: the most extensive inte- riors ; and this being once established by necessity, the natural progress of ideas must have endeavoured to replace it, by constructions more solid and durable. That the Greeks have constructed what we de- signate rotundas is beyond a doubt, as also that they have employed carpentry to cover similar interiors. The Odeon furnishes us with an example. Pausanias describes a circular edifice named Philippeum, erected in honour of Philip, king of Macedonia, the covering of which was likewise of wood ; having at its summit a species of ornament of bronze, to which the ends of the rafters were secured. The same writer makes mention of a circular structure at Epidaurus, the whole of wliich was constructed of white marble. Also of another of the same form and materials, but of a more ancient date, at Orchomenos ; covered with an he- mispherical arch, or what is termed a cupola of stone; having its key of the same material. Thus hemispherical arches were constructed in Greece, not only of wood, but of stone. 2 II 234 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. This manner of construction was afterwards adopted at Rome, and, as forming a part in the thermae, pa- laces, &c. received new modifications, which gave rise to arches presenting other forms than those which had hitherto been employed. Such were the sur- based arch (testudo), the hemispherical arch, applied to elliptical and octagonal plans with pendentives (hemisphserium), and the arch with lunettes, or groins (camera lunelata). The employment of this last species became indispensable in the construction of immense interiors requiring large openings for the admission of light; the windows naturally being in- scribed within the space formed by the intersecting arches. There is no example of this description of arch on an extensive scale, anterior to the construc- tion of what is commonly, though doubtfully, named the Temple of Peace. The same species was Hkewise employed in the thermae. 'I'hose bearing the name of Dioclesian are the best preserved. The great saloon in the centre of this thermae exists in its entire state, and is used at the present time as a church. If this construction be minutely examined, the germ and principle of the pointed, or what is more gene- rally termed the Gothic arch, to which such trivial and improbable origins have been assigned, may be discovered. This saloon is covered by a groined arch or vault; the springing points of which are supported by eight granite columns, which decorate it sides. The whole of this vaulted covering is composed of three large compartments, formed by a longitudinal and transversal, or by intersecting arches. This example, which has been selected in prefer- ence to any other, on account of its being moie ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 235 generally known, may serve to show, that necessity aione, which requires that extensive interiors be con- structed after this solid manner, suggested long before the time of the Gothic, the system of intersecting arches. By comparing the naves of Gothic churches with the above-mentioned example, no other differ- ence will be found than what results from the nature and employment of the materials. The springing points of the arches of the thermae rise from cohimns, in the same manner that Gothic arches rest upon pillars. We shall now resume our researches into the alterations that the forms and employment of the hemispherical arch of the ancients underwent, in its application in modern architecture, from the restora- tion of the arts to the present time. The general form of the antique temples, saj^s M. Quatremere, is that of a parallelogram. But a con- siderable number were erected that were circular in their plan. This last-mentioned form appears more particularly to have been observed in temples dedi- cated to certain divinities, such as Vesta, Sybilla, Bacchus, &c. The most celebrated, and also the best preserved, of the antique rotundas, is that at Rome which bears the name of the Pantheon, supposed to have been dedicated to all the deities. The ancients executed no edifices, cither of a curvilineal, or any other form, presenting the particular character which distinguishes the modern cupolas or domes from the antique rotundas. The worship of the ancients con- sisted of sacrifices, followed by torrefactions, libations, and many other customs, which from the smoke, odour, and cleansino^s, that attended (hem, would have been 2S6 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. insupportable in the interior of a confined edifice, and which alone could he practised in the open air. Thus a temple amongst the ancients was in reality but a species of sanctuary, generally of a limited extent, and in some cases without covering. The sacrifices were made at the front of the temple, in an inclosurc which was often of great extent, and by which it was sur- rounded. It is even doubtful whether the rotundas, or other edifices of this kind, have been temples. The Pantheon is suspected, and not without great proba- bility, as having formed part of the thermae of A grip- pa. It is the only one of the saloons that has escaped destruction, amongst all those whose remains are ap- proximately situated, and the great total of whose plan is known to the generality of artists. The difference of the mode of worship introduced by the Christian religion, required interiors of a suf- ficient extent to contain the number of those who attended the ceremonies; and as instruction formed a principal portion of that worship, it became necessary that the limits of their extent should be such as to admit of the minister being heard by all the indivi- duals present. Amongst all the ancient edifices, none presented a form so well adapted for that which was required as the basilica, whose spacious interiors were proportionate to the nature of the ceremonies. The disposition of their plans being in the form of the letter T was alone sufficient, independently of their analogy with the sign of Christianity, to cause the form of a cross to be adopted in the plans of the first churches afterwards erected. The desire which they manifested to retrace in this form the sign which was the principal object of their ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 237 veneration, caused them to depart from time to time, from the simplicity of the basiHca, by the addition of a transversal nave crossing the principal nave at riffht angles. This point of the intersection of the two naves, presenting itself from all parts of the edifice, necessarily formed one of its most prominent features. And if the custom of placing the principal altar in this situation was for a time undetermined, it was because time had sanctioned its anterior disposition in the semicircular recess at the extremity of the edifice ; whence the construction of a plan thus disposed, na- turally conduced to the decoration of this part in a particular manner, and which could not fail to foster and give rise to the idea of erecting domes or cupolas. The first cupola with pendentives, after the antique constructions, was that of St. Sophia, at Constanti- nople, which exhibits the progression observed in pro- ductions of this kind. It cannot be positively asserted that this dome is situated precisely in the centre of a cross, as the four branches have not the extent which it has since been customary to give to naves; in other respects the exterior form of this edifice is square, except that one of the parts is prolonged more than the others, and terminated by a hemicycle, wherein the altar was placed. 'J'he first employment of pen- dentives, as forminjT a portion of the base of a cupola, is not of modern invention ; the antique presents us with an example in a saloon of the thermae Caracalla^ the plan of which forms an octagon having eight pen- dentives, constituting a part of the base of the hemi- spherical arch with which it was covered. The church of St. Mark, at Venice, which is sup- posed by some to have been formed from that of St. 238 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. Sophia, at Constantinople, expresses in its plan the form of a cross still more distinctly. In reality there is but little similarity between the flat curved cupola of St. Sophia, and the five domes which rise in so sin- gular a manner above the church of Venice. The plan of St. Sophia is of a form resembling those of the square saloons of the antique thermae ; having a por- tion of its sides decorated with a range of columns, and at each extremity there is a large semicircular niche. The pendentives, which form the circular base of the dome, spring from internal angles. Those of St. Mark are in projection, the principal nave being- intersected by a transversal one at right angles. Last- ly, the greatest similarity which exists between these two edifices, consists in the style of their architecture, and certain parts of their decoration. The cupolas of these two churches, even those of St. Mark's, not- withstanding their elevated curve, present nothing resembling modern domes ; namely, the elevation of a cupola upon a circular basement, forming a tower in- teriorly and exteriorly. Passing over the numerous Gothic attempts, such as those at the cathedral of Milan, formed of ogives, the situation of which is announced at the exterior, by a species of decoration rising above the edifice, the cathedral of Pisa presents the first example. If Bus- chetto acquired any degree of fame in the erection of this cathedral, it was not on account of its cupola, which forms so puerile and uninteresting an accessary of an edillce, that in other respects presents so im- portant a feature in the history of architecture, but by the disposition and extent of its naves. Brunelischi, who raised the cupola of St. Maria del ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 239 Fiore, at Florence, was the first that presented the idea of double cupolas, as also their elevated curva- ture ; which has generallj^ been imitated in those since erected. The church of the Augustines, situated at Navonnf. Place, at Rome, is supposed by some writers to be thi^ ,-<..».i-».-. y*^-- >■>.. CVKA >]R]^AMEI^T OrTL^Ii^O.^ PAS^ \\ \{^,^.\\mi u.^^ \ \ I #yi^ iai.iiiw^ .d^ T'aUi'hi'^orAainfJSiiv.^.WbBr'd /> OjRPfAMIEJ^TS. .v^XL' ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 25 i are equally applicable to the exterior and interior parts of edifices ; and those which may be derived from painting'. The resources of decoration are indeed so considerable, that they may be said to comprise even a part of the means employed in construction, and to exercise some degree of power over the quality of the materials. But all these means, far from serving to characterize edifices, or to make their uses distinguishable,^ become only the instruments of confusion, if their application be not directed by an enlightened understanding. Decoration in itself is the art of appropriately em- ploying the ornamental resources of architecture; and as richness in architecture is one of the signs repre- sentative of power, greatness, and majesty, to employ the same species or proportion of richness or decora- tion to all edifices, would be a manifest and glaring impropriety. It must be evident, therefore, that an architect is not at liberty to employ these resources indiscriminately ; and that the nature of each edifice indicates the kind and the proportion of decoration which appropriately belongs to it. Considered in its partial resources, or in its details, decoration is a language the signs and expressions of which ought to present a precise signification, capable of conveying to the mind the intended ideas. With- out this, it forms but an unintelligible jargon, com- posed of puerile and insignificant formules, or of signs that are mute to the mind ; the capricious and fortui- tous distribution of which is calculated only to attract the sight, at the expense of shocking the under- standing. It is in vain that the arti>t possesses the most 252 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. energetic means of expressing his ideas, and of giving to his edifices a species of visible, though mute elo- quence, in the resources of decoration; unless he endeavours to attain that intelligence, which is re- quisite to profit ably by those resources. The origin of decoration, taken generally, may be deduced from the passion for variety, and that ad- miration of beautiful forms so natural to man, which impelled him to devise the means of multiplying and varying his sensations, and consequently of increasing the sources of his pleasure and happiness. The utility of decoration becomes manifest from a consideration of the necessity of characterizing edi- fices, according to the ends for which they may be designed. To construct a prison and a palace alike, is an absurdity that needs but to be mentioned to be admitted ; and to say that because the decoration and construction of the one is characterized by largeness of division, and whatever may contribute to the ap- pearance of strength, &c., the other ought not to be characterized by elegance of form and proportion, and richness of decoration, would be to deny the utility of architectural character in buildings, and to destroy one of the most classical sources of pleasure which this art possesses. Hence two general rules may be inferred. First, that decoration ought at least to appear necessary. Secondly, that it ought to employ only such objects as are in relation with the general design to which they are applied. In saying that decoration ought at least to appear to be necessary, is meant, that all the parts of edifices cannot be considered as being alike susceptible of receiving ornaments. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 253 By a necessary decoration is understood, that just application of ornaments, the absence of which would produce a vacancy in the mind ; and the presence of which tends to express the nature of the object to which it is applied, by developing its character, in a direct appeal to the sense of sight. It derives the motives of its inventions or combinations from the particular properties of that which it is intended to embellish, or from the circumstances relating to them ; and it draws its objects, and the necessity of varying them, from three sources, which it is important should be well understood ; namely from the passion for variety, from analogy, and from allegory. Indeed, in the decoration of the antique architecture, which of all others is the best systematized, there may be found a considerable number of forms and details for which no other apology can be offered than that of the pleasure which is produced by the variety. There is an effect which ornaments of all kinds pro- duce in architecture; it is that of multiplying and of strenfjthening the impressions which they are capable of exciting in the mind, by the variety in their forms and application. These impressions depend on the qua- lities which are developed in decoration, and which may be reduced to those of greatness, harmony, rich- ness, and variety. Indeed, it must be evident, that the absence or presence of ornaments in architecture, like colours in painting, modify the appearance of the total ; and give to an edifice all the variety of expres- sion that our minds arc capable of receiving. The disposition of the objects employed in decoration, is another means which contributes to the production of agreeable sensations. A judicions arrangement of 254 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. decorative objects, resulting from a correct taste in forming combinations, and an adequate conception of order and harmony, cannot fail to produce corres- ponding sensations in the mind of an observer. The details of ornaments form so important a part of the pleasure w^hich results from a perfect accord in an architectural composition, that the effect which would otherwise result from correctness of proportion and harmony of design, may be totally destroyed by the confused application, or the injudicious employment of decorative objects. There are many edifices which would be acknowledged as good architectural pro- ductions, were they stripped of their decorations ; and those decorations replaced by others chosen with judgment, and applied with taste. A beautiful edi- fice may be defined to be an object of harmonious relations of order and disposition. It is essential, however, to its correctness as an architectural pro- duction, that its ornaments be in unison with the order according to which it is constructed ; and it is there- fore important to bear in mind that each of the orders has its appropriate ornaments ; the character of which corresponds to that of its form and proportion. The Doric order, which expresses strength and simplicity will in some instances, admit of ornaments being placed on the contour of its capital, on its frieze, and on dif- ferent mouldings of its cornice ; but they must partake of its general style and proportion. The Ionic, which from its proportions, forms, and modinature, is con- sidered as the medium order, admits of the application of a greater number of lighter and more varied orna- ments on its capital, and the mouldings of its entab- lature. The Corinthian, by a more abundant and ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 255 diversified employment of all the details of ornaments, on its base, capital, and the other parts of its ordon- nance, establishes such an accord between its pro- portions and forms, that gives it the property of expressing th.e qualities of richness, lightness, and magnificence. Sculpture is the great means which architecture employs to decorate its productions. The ornaments wliich are applied to the different parts of an edifice by this means, may be divided into two kinds. The first consists of compartments, which may be sub- divided into large and small, of which tiie former are panels of considerable dimension, arranged with others that are smaller ; the latter is a compartment of much less extent than the former, containing a rose, or other ornament, conformable to its figure ; and which occu- pies the centre of the first It may be employed in the form of a square, lozenge, pentagon, hexagon, octagon, or circle ; and the larger compartment may also assume an equal variety of forms. PI. 55 pre- sents examples adapted both for flat and cylindrical surfaces, together with the details of sculpture appli- cable to this description of ornaments; the enumeration of which may be concluded by referring to pi. 2, fig. II and 12, for examples of those applicable to the sofll^its or platbands of architraves ; and to pi. 21, for those to the soflfits of cornices. The second kind of ornaments may also be divided into two species. The first consists of posts, or scrolled foliage, composed of acanthus leaves and flowers, with which genii, tripods, or animals, are sometimes com- bined. These ornaments are generally applied to the hieze of the Ionic and Corinthian entablatures. 'I'o 256 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. this species likewise belong festoons and garlands, composed of flowers and fruits ; which may be em- ployed either together or separately. Sometimes they are simply formed of oak or laurel leaves. Festoons and garlands are applicable to the same parts as scrolled foliage, and may be also adapted to decorate some portion of extensive plain surfaces, such as the faces of walls. This first species of the second kind of ornaments, may be terminated by adding the roses applied to the compartments of ceilings, those which belong to the abacus of the Corinthian capital, and the culots, or masses of upright leaves ; whence the different foliage, in general spring, and may be applied according as the nature of the compositions appear to require them. The last species of ornaments of the second kind are, acanthus, olive, and water-plant leaves ; which possess the particular qualities of not materially altering the forms of the mouldings to which they are applied; and are the cyma, cavetto, and sometimes the talon. This latter moulding is occa- sionally enriched with trefoil, and flower- work, with water-plant leaves. The quarter-round is generally sculptured in oves, or other ornaments presenting a similar appearance, which are ordinarily separated by darts, and on some occasions by small flutings. To the astragal, chaplets or beads are commonly applied, the forms of which are susceptible of a very great variety. The pine apple is the last description of ornament belonging to this species, and is employed to detach dentils at their angle or return. It may easily be conceived that it is neither possible nor necessary to give a more particular definition of each of these ornaments, the form of many being ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 257 sufficiently designated by their own denominations ; a knowledge of which will be more easily and effec- tually obtained by an inspection of the examples presented in pi. 2, fig. 13 and 14; and pi. 20, 21, 38, 39, 52, 53, 54, and 55. Independently, however, of the possibility of assign- ing any particular origin to some portion of these objects, or the reason of their employment in decora- tion otherwise than from the passion for variety ; it is, nevertheless, required from the artist, that he be capable of making their utility apparent, in the effect which they should produce in the total of architectural compositions. If;, therefore, tne application of these different ornaments be not guided by judgment, and a proper consideration of the relation which ought to exist between the extent of their employment and the destination of an edifice, the true expression of the character of the total will be proportionately injured ; and consequently the general effect, which might otherwise result, be destroyed In order to perfect its decorative language, architecture is obliged to draw upon another source ; and to increase its means of expressing character by an appeal to analogy. The aid of analogy, however, could only have been called in after a considerable diffusion of knowledge, as it was necessary to understand this analogy, or it would fail in its intended effect. This was not the case with simple variety. The language of analogy is progres- sive in its nature, and is not the same in all countries, as it has its origin in the connexion which exists between certain forms and the purposes to which they have been, or are, usually applied. The gloom of a prison is proverbially and inseparably connected with massive 2 L 258 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. walls and imperfectly lighted apartments; whilst ideas of pomp, magnificence, pleasure, and gaiety, are as inseparably connected with the elegant form and proportion, and the rich decoration of a palace. The idea of pleasure on the one hand becomes asso- ciated with edifices of elegant form and proportion, richly decorated, and beautifully executed ; whilst on the other, the rough-hewn massive walls of a prison are associated with misery, afl^iction, and gloom. Be- tween the two extremes, a palace and a prison, there exists many grades — to characterize which appro- priately, will call forth the judgment of the artist. If it be required that an edifice should express one of the intervening qualities, such a disposition of the parts must be adopted, and such ornaments chosen, as are in unison with the intended eft'ect. The em- ployment of such ornaments as present the most finished execution, and are light in their details, gives rise to that idea of richness, which is a never-failing source of pleasure to the beholder. If, on the con- trary, the intended effect be that of resistance or strength, few ornaments must be admitted ; because that division of the parts which results from their employment weakens the idea of strength, and some- times also reduces that apparent solidity which is necessary to its character. The only ornaments ad- missible in this case are such as present but few details, or that appear to be principally dependent on the construction itself The objects of decoration, drawn from the analogy of the primitive constructions of necessity, have in the commencement of this work been sufficiently made known, and therefore require no farther enumeration. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 259 The bases, shafts, and capitals of columns, parts of ihe entablature, soffits or ceilings, and pediments, bear with them such incontestible marks of their origin, as not to require further proof Thus modinature forms a very important part of architecture, as also one of the bases of decoration, proceeding from the system of analogy, which constitutes the principle of imitation in the art. It is doubtless possible, by the scrupulous employ- ment of the indicative types of the origin of the art, to join all the variety that the taste of decoration requires, and, without altering their forms, to multi- ply, almost indefinitely, the shades of character which each edifice ought to receive. The system of archi- tecture, and its division into three styles, proves how capable the forms of necessity are of admitting in their decoration a well-characterized expression — liovv well they are adapted to receive a progressive gradation of richness or simplcity, of variety or uniformity. This constitutes a very intelligible language, the value of which is proportionately enhanced when the artist knows how to express his ideas, and the spectator is able to comprehend them. Ornaments, in the sense in which they have been hitherto considered in this article, are particularly composed of objects sculptured upon mouldings and profiles, and those which are applied to the surfaces of the principal forms of archi- tecture. The effect, however, may be considerably modified in the execution of these kinds of ornaments. Tlicy are a species of characters, the expression of which sculpture is enabled to render more or less striking, by giving to them, in the execution, more or less projection ; tracing them lightly or deep, or 260 ARCHITECTURAI. DIRECTOR. exhibiting in their contours a greater or Jess degree of sharpness, and consequently detaching them with more or less vivacity. Thus all the different shades which may be produced in their effects, contribute, in some measure, to the expression of character. In the execution of ornaments, it is also essential to take into consideration the dimensions or extent of the edifice, and the distance of the parts, intended to be sculptured, from the sight. There is a soft and light, strong and deep, a rough and a finished manner of executing ornaments, which is governed, like that of statues, by their dimensions and the point of sight. Another great source whence architecture has enriched its decorative powers, and draws its most numerous and best adapted means of hieroglyphic expression, is allegory. Allegory is the simple and natural language of the imitative arts, which convey their meaning through the medium of signs and figures. From the applica- tion which architecture makes of this language of the arts, and the symbols which it affords, the most abundant means are obtained of giving to the deco- ration of edifices, as determined a signification and distinct property, as is possessed by, each of the arts from which those means are drawn. The resources which allegory presents in decoration, are such as enable an architect to characterize all species of compositions by its symbols. It is in its decorative appropriations that architecture becomes a powerful auxiliary and handmaid to history. It explains thereby the general and particular object for which an edifice was destined ; informing us of the moral or physical purpose for which it was employed. A.KCH1TECTUKAL DIRECTOR, 261 Allegorical decoration is more expressive than all tlie inscriptive matter which it may be possible to make use of. When the suitable compositions employed in the decoration of an edifice have been drawn from alle- gory, we are enabled even from its ruins, to discover its original destination. How many of the antique edifices would have sunk into a nameless oblivion, and their destination have remained for ever unknown, if some fragments of their allegorical decoration, found amongst their remains, had not explained to us what they were, and the uses for which they were em- ployed ! The principal objects made use of in alle- gorical decoration, whether employed by means of painting or sculpture, may be divided into three classes. The first comprehends attributes, the second is com- posed of figures, and the third embraces subjects of composition. Under the name of attributes are comprehended all the symbols and emblems, rendered visible by means of painting or sculpture ; which become, by their conciseness, a species of monograms in the figurative composition of architecture. At the head of attributes may be placed the greater part of foliage and plants, which form so important a feature in the composition of ornaments. It was from the religious ceremonies of the primitive race, from their desire to deck and embellish, by the productions of nature, the construc- tions dedicated to their deities; and also from the offering of fruits, plants, and roots, at their oblations and sacrifices , that the greater part of compositions presenting scrolled foliage bearing fruits and flowers took their origin. It would be difficult to contradict 262 ARCHITECTURA.L DIKEGTOU. such an etymology, since even at the present period and in the midst of an artificial luxury of decoration in edifices, the natural decorations just mentioned are employed in civil and religious /e^e*. Thus garlands, festoons, flowers, wreaths, and the foliage of capitals, owe their origin to the same source. Each of these objects may, as an attribute, or emblem of a known and expressed custom, be employed in decoration with a special and characteristic signification. The instruments of sacrifice, ornaments of the sacri- ficer, sanctified vases, heads of the animals sacrificed, fillets, paterae, and all those objects that were employed in that part of the worship of the ancients, have been transmitted as attributes in the decoration of sacred edifices. Architecture has made conventional signs of all these emblems, which, notwithstanding the differ- ences of custom adopted in modern worship, are no less received as a metaphorical means of indicating the destination of the edifice to which they are applied. Among the ancients, each divinity had its particular attributes. Indeed, the divinities were but a species of attributes expressive of the different properties of nature, or the physical or moral relation of things. Although there is no longer any faith in the powers of Jupiter, Venus, Neptune, Nymphs, Diana, Apollo, the Muses, and the other figurative beings, the ideas at- tached to these allegorical forms, and their relations to the different qualities, &c., of which their names and figures are the representation, cannot be dispelled. The attributes which form their retinues, have, indeed, long been admitted as so many devices or emblems, which constitute the figurative language of the imi- tative arts. Architectural decoration, above all, profits ARCHITECTUBAL DIRECTOR. 263 by them to characterize its productions. The eagle and thunderbolts were, with the ancients, the symbohc representatives of eternity and almighty power ; the myrtle-branch and the dove characterized affection: the lyre and the laurel-branch were the symbols of harmony and of fame ; and the employment of shells, dolphins, &c. in an edifice, indicated its devotion to aquatic purposes. The helmet and lance were the symbols of war ; the palm-branch and wreath an- nounce victory ; and the olive, peace. The balance is the natural and beautiful representative of justice ; the quiver and arrows, the synonyms of Cupid ; and the serpent, of ^^sculapius. Ears of corn, of Ceres ; the owl, of Minerva ; and the cock, of Mercury ; who were themselves considered as the presiding divinities over abundance, science, and vigilance. The instruments belonging to the arts and sciences, are all objects which may be employed, as the natural ensigns of those purposes for which an edifice may be destined. The matter that the combination and em- ployment of attributes affords to decoration, is as varied as it is extensive. They may be changed, modified, and reproduced under difTerent forms, by the genius of the artist ; taking care not to sacrifice the clearness of their expression to novelty of combi- nation. There is in this respect a medium to be ob- served ; so as not to present to the sight enigmas in place of inscriptions. There are certain given forms and acknowledged attributes which require to be judiciously applied ; as well as precedents which it is necessary to respect. But the most essential thing in their application, is, that the greatest possible judgment and discretion be observed in their distribution ; and 264 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. in the choice of them, as regards the relation which tney bear to each other. How inconsistent it must appear to apply sphinxes to a fountain, to throw out water ; trophies to a monument, not triumphal ; or the symbols of the arts, and those of the virtues, to places serving as receptacles for neither art nor virtue ! Indeed, the inconsistencies which have been, and even now are practised, in the decoration of modern archi- tecture, are almost innumerable. The second class of objects which architecture em- ploys in its allegorical decorations is composed of figures. Figures may be considered either as relates to the subjects that they express, or the manner in which they are emyloyed. Figures, with respect to the subjects intended to be expressed, may be divided into two kinds, simple and composed. Composed figures are those which have taken their orig^in from the hieroglyphical style of writing, and w ere originally figures of objects, serving as real characters ; but which, by an early license, were transmitted into ar- chitectural decoration, although their literal value was lost. It is named the arabesque style, and is for the greater part composed of capricious, fantastical, and imaginary objects, represented in architecture by painting or sculpture, and employed in the decoration of walls, panels, sides of doors, surfaces of pilasters, friezes, and sometimes to the soffits of flat and cylin- drical ceilings. This style consists of three things which are very independent of, and present themselves in a distinct manner from, each other. The first comprises those representations and ar- chitectural compositions, the irregular and capricious forms of which are mostly taken from oriental monu- ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 265 meiits and edifices, and were introduced into decora- tion amongst the Romans, as the absurdities of the Cliinese have been introduced into this country. The second is composed of all kinds of figures, and imaginary animals ; having the head and foreparts of one species of animals joined to the body of another ; of which sphinxes are examples. Such forms served, in the early ages, as signs of a language ; or the allegories which they represented belonged to the dogmas of the Egyptian and oriental mythology. The third comprehends scrolled foliage, festoons, leaves, and other similar objects; invented by the Greeks and Romans, and employed by them in their edifices, either by the means of painting or sculpture. The most numerous examples of this species of architectural decoration, as practised by the ancients, are those presented in the remains of the thermae of Titus, and those at Pompeii. Almost the whole of the interiors are decorated with views and perspectives of edifices ; the singular forms and compositions of which, instead of having excited researches into their true cause and origin, have given rise only to erroneous opinions, and strange conjectures. The Romans, like all nations habituated to luxury, sought pleasure in the novelty and variety produced by differences in style and taste. Yet this is certain, that they never extended their caprice, as has been practised in this country, to such acts as those of realizing, in a durable manner, designs of edifices presenting the most barbarous styles ; the contrast produced by which would have been considered by them as too revolting. The most severe critic can find nothing to condemn 2 !VI 266 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. in that description of arabesque which is composed of scrolled foliage, leaves, and running ornaments ; the origin of which can only be attributed to the same causes as ornaments in general. The best examples of this kind, executed in painting, are those of the thermae of Titus, and those at Pompeii. Those exe- cuted in sculpture, are the face of the pilasters of the arch ofPola, in Istria ; the arch of Titus, at Rome; and the fragments of the villa Medici. These exam- ples are models of taste and execution, in which the trtist will always find fresh resources for the embel- jishment of his edifices. Such compositions as the foreo'oins: should not be confounded with those so justly reproved by Vitruvius, which present an ex- travagant compilation of objects, composed of unna- tural forms. After having spoken on the taste of the ancients in decoration, who, in all subjects of painting, represented the objects as they naturally were, this author remarks, " I know not from what caprice the rule which the ancients adopted is not still followed, of always taking such things for models as are con- sistent with nature. For the paintings that are at the present time executed upon walls, instead of forming real and regular imitations of objects, present nothing but extravagances. In place of columns, reeds or stems are substituted, bearing interwoven fluted branches of plants, and having their leaves divided and turned in imitation of volutes. Small temples are placed upon the summits of candelabra ; whence, as if they had roots, scrolled foliage rises, upon which fio'ures are seated. In other places flowered work is represented as connected with half figures : some of which bear the heads of men, and others those of ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 267 animals; which are things contrary to the laws of nature. Such is the power of habit or mode, whether it proceeds from indolence, or from want of judgment, that the greater part of mankind shut their eyes to the true principles of the arts. For how can it be sup- posed that these reeds sustain a roof; that the can- delabra support an edifice ; that weak branches bear figures ; or that half-formed figures could spring from stems, roots, or foliage ? Notwithstanding their in- consistency, no one corrects these impertinences ; on the contrary, they are encouraged, without questioning their consistency ; so little are the generality of minds capable of judging of that which merits to be approved and authorized. For myself, I think that painting ought only to be esteemed in proportion as its repre- sentations are natural and true ; that it is not suflficient that the execution be good ; but it is also necessary that the design be reasonable ; and that it present nothing to shock the understanding." In this passage, Vitruvius has defined the nature of arabesques, in as correct a manner as he has also indicated their origin and history. From it may be perceived, that this style, which was introduced at the period at which he wrote, had not as then attained that point of perfection, for which it was afterwards distinguished. Nevertheless, wiien we reflect on the superiority that accompanied all sorts of decoration amongst the ancients, on the character of originality which they always presented, and when we examine the astonishing variety that the antique arabesques oflcr, their masterly execution, the charming details which they contain, the htippy ideas and valuable analogies which they afi'ord, it will be seen why the 2G8 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR minds of so many able men have been led away by them. Nor will it be difficult to discover, why the greatest man of whom modern painting can boast, did not judge them with so much severity as Vitruvius. About the fifteenth century, when the arts had reached a higher degree of perfection than they have ever since attained amongst the moderns, Raphaello, on the discovery of arabesques, presented in the frag- ments of the thermae of Titus, though they offered but a sketch of antique painting, discovered therein what was sufficient to inspire a mind so acute and penetra- ting. He succeeded in restoring and redeeming the taste of decoration ; and all the details of ornaments condemned until then to the arid monotony of the Gothic. The secret of stuccoes was discovered ; the preparations of the ancients reappeared ; and ara- besques were employed in the decoration of the most magnificent palaces. This style, executed by Ra- phaello, guided by an exquisite and delicate taste, and aided by his able co-operators, who prided themselves in being his disciples, could not fail to obtain that reputation by which it was distinguished amongst the ancients as well as amongst the moderns. Raphaello has had many copyists in this branch of the art, but not one successful imitator. The best modern examples of arabesques in Italy are his pro- ductions, or those of his school. Such are those of the Doria palace, at Genoa; Cancelleria, Villa Lanti, and the Villa Olgiati at Rome ; with several others. The arabesque style ought to be governed in its caprices, so that the union of things possible and im- possible form not too striking contrasts. Arabesques should be employed in the decoration of superfices, or ARCniTECTUKAL DIRECTOR. 269 apartments, whicli are only of medium dimensions. When applied to immense surfaces, this style loses all the effect of its details, and that species of verisimili- tude which is not objected to when on a lesser scale ; without however being able to attain the propriety, harmony, and just relation which the decoration of large apartments requires. Arabesques should never be employed in the deco- ration of any situations that require solemnity, and ought to inspire respect ; as this style presents a di- versity of discordant subjects and objects, whicli are incompatible with such sentiments. It is in small apartments that the application of its resources are best employed. In such situations will be found, by means of ingenious compositions, suitable occasions for the display of the most vaiied motives. Allegory furnishes it with inexhaustible means, by the meta- phorical decoration of each apartment, and the dedi- cation of it to the divinity that presides over the use to which it is applied. The different emblems of sleep, Apollo, Bacchus, the Muses, &c. ; the plants which are consecrated to them, their attributes, w hich together with the animals, birds, and insects, that bear an affinity to each of these deities, ought to be dis- tinctly and separately represented in each apartment; indicating the reigning subject and proper character of the locality ; the appropriate use of which is in- tended to be expressed. This manner of decoration has the advantage of being adapted to the irregularity and disproportion of apartments. In the hands of an intelligent artist, it seldom fails in concealing the most striking and disa- greeable forms ; and it affords the means of decorating 270 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. any surface. If the height of the part to which it is intended to be applied be not of a suitable proportion, it may be subdivided, so as to reduce it to a more apparent relation with its length. If the length of the apartment be too great for its height, this inconvenience may be remedied, by dividing its length according to the proportions prescribed by the least spaces ; which will form those of pilasters, friezes, and panels. The last permit of being filled, either with figured drapery, or with round, oval, or square forms ; that receive paintings attached from space to space by ribands ; or by draperies forming folds at each part from which they are suspended. By these means a regularity of proportion, and also a symmetry of design, may be given to apartments. The vacant spaces w^ill permit of the insertion of rising ornaments composed of leaves, flowers, branches, &c., executed either in painting or sculpture. This style of ornaments requires the greatest care on the part of the artist, both as regards composition and execution. When scrolled foliage rises to the height of from ten to twelve feet, it is necessary to avoid gaining that elevation at one cast, or from one point at the lower extremity ; and to distribute the height into three parts. The stem should be of such a sufficient consistence, as reasonably to produce all that may be introduced along the surface until it reaches where it is divided by means of a cameo, or by a painting; the total should be terminated by objects bearing some analogy to the rest. It should be observed, not to make the scrolled foliage too rich or too heavy ; as flowing forms and simple contours constitute its greatest merit. The ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 211 different branchings or ramifications which may be introduced, to give variety to a composition, should be motived and authorized ; the parts ought to follow each other, and be naturally introduced, making the reason of their situation evident. The choice of lea\ es may be ranked among the means which afford the greatest abundance and variety of contours, and of striking effects. Such are the wild acanthus, artemisia, matricaria, hemlock, large parsley, &c. ; all of which produce sharp outlines and effective touches. In the employment of these leaves, it is necessary to study the natural order and gradation of their masses. The first masses should be small, the others succes- sively increasing as they approach the centre, after- wards diminishing as they reach their extremities, which should be weaker ; it being requisite that the stronger bear the weaker parts. The imiiation ought to be sufficiently perfect to make known the different plants which have served as models to this style. Although such licenses may be taken in their execution as characterizes this branch of decoration, yet from this departure from a scrupulous imitation of nature, one of the greatest pleasures which their employment is capable of producing, is lost. The details of the arabesque style are so numerous, tlie combinations by which they are modified so various, that the precepts of taste in their employment might almost be infinitely multiplied. The greater lart of them being: common to the other branches of decoration, they will be found treated upon in the different parts of this article. But it is harmony, (hat great principle of the arts, which ought to be most observed in the composition, execution, and arrange- 272 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. ment of arabesques, I'his liarmony may be divided into three classes ; namely, the harmony of ideas, of colours, and of masses. The harmony of ideas, in the unity of motive or design, in the intelligence of the details, the intellectual relation of each of the parts, and the concert of all the attributes and accessories ; w^hich, when guided uni- formly towards the same end, gives to this style a forcible symbolical expression. Harmony of colours results from a skilful accord of all the parts which form the composition and grounds presenting a variety of colours ; the agreeableness and mellowness of the tones, judicious introduction of stuc- coes, bassi-rilievi, scrolled foliage and figures ; and from the manner of executing them according to the situation, effect of the light, and the distance of the objects. Harmony of masses is that which presides most predominantly in the arrangement of arabesques ; it consists in the distribution and employment of the parts, so as not to let too great a portion of the ground be perceived, or unequally covered. It is from this judicious disposition of the lines, that arise the agree- able impressions afforded to the sight ; the execution presenting nothing either wanting or out of place. That part of arabesques, of which the scrolled foliage of the ancients offers the most beautiful models, is the most difficult ; and but rarely introduced in modern arabesques. Simple figures, which constitute the second kind ot the second class of allegorical objects, are those that possess an evident model in nature. It is in this class, more than in any other, that allegory becomes ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 273 unlimited It furnishes decoration with matter which is as rich as it is inexhaustible. To whatever use an edifice may be destined, or whatever be the style of its architecture, figures, if they be characteristic, will add greatly to its effect. A triumphal arch, entrance gates, theatre, hospital, market, fountain, palace, church, &c., are all suscep- tible of receiving allegorical motives or designs. Simple figures, in decoration, comprehend bassi-ri- lievi, together with figures in rilievo, as statues. The latter are too generally considered as objects purely decorative. Niches, pedestals, and colonnades, in which statues are placed, are often employed merely to give effect to a composition ; without the least question as to the propriety of the subject of the design with the use of the edifice. The application of statues, as being one of the greatest luxuries of decoration, should be principally confined to publi ; monuments, and public edifices. The third class of allegorical subjects, or extensive compositions in painting or sculpture, has been the one most employed by the moderns. It is not probable that the ancients ever introduced, in the interior decoration of their edifices, allegorical compositions of such gigantic dimensions as the moderns have. It is true that the ancients applied subjects in painting to the interior of their edifices ; but it may be affirmed, that they consisted only of such compositions as could easily be taken in by the sight, and as easily understood by the mind. They were by no means so extensive as those executed by the modems, particularly in the decoration of cupolas and ceilings. These immense compOvsitions have no other 2 N 274 ARCHITECTURAFv DIRECTOR. value than the effect ot'tlie colours, and the cleception of the perspective. In such applications it is indeed difficult to develop a correct taste, and the true principles of imitation. The too great extent of a composition in painting, has the disadvantage of not being able to address the comprehension of the spectator. For how is it pos- sible that the mind should be able to comprehend the total of a composition at an elevation of three hundred feet, and comprising also a circumference of three hundred feet? When it is necessary to represent objects at such a distance, it is better to employ simple allegorical characters ; or the ornaments that archi- tecture furnishes, as being more suitable to such situ- ations. Sculptured figures, and subjects executed in basso- relievo, have sometimes been introduced in the deco- ration of cupolas and cylindrical ceilings. Nothing can be more improper than this employment of sculp- ture, the heavy appearance of which seems to menace the safety of the spectator. Sculpture, when injudiciously employed in deco- ration, is fatiguing ; both to the sight and the under- standing. Equally offensive are misplaced allegorical characters and subjects of composition ; which, when applied with discretion, are invaluable to architecture, as being one of the most natural and appropriate means of decoration. The greater part of the antique edifices, and some modern ones, prove what a degree of expression may be attained in their decoration by means of sculpture in basso-rilie\ o. The Greeks and Romans applied a considerable portion of the riches of sculpture to the pediments of ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 275 their edifices. The Partlienon, at xA.thens, has pre- served some fragments of the decoration of its pedi- ment ; which exhibits to us an example of perfection in execution, united to greatness in composition. The metal cramps in the tympanum of the portico of the Pantheon, at Rome, indicates that its pediment was decorated with a basso-rilievo. The columns of Trajan and Antoninus, and the triumphal arches, may be further cited as varied examples of the inexhausti- ble resources of sculpture. These last-mentioned pro- ductions exhibit to advantage, the resources of the art as a medium of historical communication ; its monu- mental inscriptions serving as records of past events. There are three kindsof relief by which figures are more or less detached from the ground upon which they are sculptured, namely, the alto-rilievo, or bold relief; mezzo-rilievo, the medium or half-relief; and the basso-rilievo, or low relief; but each of these is at the present day indiscriminately termed a basso-rilievo. Although the execution of this style particularly relates to sculpture, yet, from the frequent, necessary, and varied employment of it in architectural decoration, both internally and externally, it would have been a blameable omission not to have mentioned it in this article in its proper place. An architect, doubtless, stands in less need of being familiarly acquainted with all the details and precepts of execution in this branch of art than a sculptor ; but, he ought not to be igno- rant of the origin, nature, and correct rules of taste, which constitute the perfection of this part of decora- tion. By this knowledge he will be enabled to direct the sculptor in the form, disposition, and style, suitable to ba.ssi-rilievi ; according to the maniici in which he 276 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. may judge requisite to employ them, and the accord which ought to exist between them and the ordon- nance, conformably with the character of each edifice. Amongst the ancients, bassi-rilievi were never em- ployed independently of architecture. Whether this branch of art displayed its riches in the pediments of temples, or on the triumphal arches — whether it decorated the face of a frieze, or the more confined space of a metope, in its applicatian to pedestals and stylobates, vases, altars, and tombs, ornamenting their contours, designating their employment, or giving movement to their aspect, yet it will be found invari- ably to be subordinate to the architecture, or to the forms of the objects to which it is applied. The principle followed in the application of bassi- rilievi to the triumphal arches is the same as that which is manifested in the construction of the Trajan column, and all other monuments presenting the same spirit of design. The bassi-rilievi employed in these examples constitute a long and visible narration of the actions of this emperor ; they form an ocular recitative ; a material and strikins; historv of his actions and vie- tories, The division w^hich the historical sculptor should make of the portion of this style belonging to art, and that part of it which properly belongs to history, ought to be such as to induce him to regard his figures under a double relation ; endeavouring to make them express the reason of their employment, rather than to draw admiration ; they ought to instruct rather than please. He should make them speak to the nnderstanding, in the clearest manner, all the language which they adopt ; rather than employ his skill to render their contours more agreeable. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 277 It should be observed, not to employ a multitude of ornaments around bassi-rilievi ; as these attract the sight and attention from the principal subjects which they offer. If they are not insulated by means of a moulding, there should be an even surface left around them to give repose to the sight, and effect to their relief; likewise similar arrangements ought to be made between them and the different members of architec- ture. The proximity of the principal parts, the pro- files and details, injures the effect of bassi-rilievi, and introduces discord in the total. The relation of the proportions of bassi-rilievi, and the figures of which they are composed, with an ordonnance, is another point which ought not to be neglected by an architect. There might result, from this want of an exact and judicious relation, a striking disproportion in the whole of the composition. The figures in bassi-rilievi serve as a sort of scale, whereby to appreciate the different dimensions. The small or exagro^erated size of the figures would render DO O th'3 appearance of the ordonnance either trivial or colossal; and by this means injure the propor- tions of an edifice, which in themselves might be beautiful. The same may be said as regards the greater or less |)rojection that bassi-rilievi ought to have. An archi- tect ought to regulate it according to the degree of strength or delicacy of his ordonnance, greater or less expression of force and energy of the profiles, the general character of the style adopted, the point of view of the edifice, and also the situation of the bassi- rilievi ; the light they may receive, the effect it is ticressjuy to j)ioduce, and its accordance with the 278 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. reigning style of the ornaments, and the quality or value of the surrounding parts or details. The rules of taste relative to a good and judicious employment of sculpture, whether allegorical or his- torical, in edifices, equally appertain to all the pre- ceding precepts and observations. The importance of this article, the subject of which constitutes a great portion of the art of architecture, will form a sufficient apology for its being so conside- rably extended. It shall, however, be concluded by offering a few remarks on decorative painting, and the imitation of all that is employed in the embellishment of edifices by that means. This part of decoration consists in the imitation of another imitation. Indeed, if we except figures, landscapes, flowers, and some other objects which sometimes form a portion of the combinations of the decorator, the principal parts of this branch of the art consist in perspective or geometrical views of archi- tectural ornaments in relief; of statues, niches, vases.^ altars, monuments, &c., produced by painting, under different forms. This imitative decoration has the same principles, and is governed by the greater part of the rules which are applicable to the original deco- ration, which serves as its model. An arcV.ltect, who ought always to guide the deco- rator, should only permit the employment of feint decorative architecture on walls and superfices ; of which the point of view is common to a great number of spectators ; admitting nothing in his compositions inconsistent with correct taste. The decorator may be less restricted in the embel- lishment of the interior apartments and galleries, where ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 279 his art is not subjected to any pre-existing ordonnance. Under these circumstances, decorative painting has two different ways of employing its resources. It may either be considered as presenting architectural paintings, or as replacing the different parts of an or- donnance by an exact and deceptive imitation of them. In the first, the decorator paints on the walls ideal views of edifices, representations of well-known monu- ments, or ruins. This part is dependant on painting, and enters into the ordinary rules of imitation. This species of illusion, which tends to conceal, by the effect of aerial and lineal perspective, the apparent consistence of the surface to which it is applied, is not suitable to all kinds of interiors, and would often be misplaced in the decoration of certain apartments ; which, by being destined for important uses, require an expression of gravity. It is adapted for the deco- ration of dining-rooms, and others of a similar use. In the second way, the decorative painter replaces, by the effect of imitation, the resources of real archi- tecture. In place of columns in relief, entablatures, pilasters, niches, and real statues, all these objects may be executed in painting. This style of decora- tion is then subjected to the same rules of proportion and propriety as real architecture : none but an archi- tect should conduct its execution. Its great merit consists in the purity of its forms, and the truth of its tones. This species of illusion, when well executed, will sometimes at the first glance deceive the most experienced eye. There are examples of this kind of deception, which are so ably combined with real architecture, that it is difficult to avoid being deceived thereby. 280 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. All the other objects of which decoration is com- posed, forming an assemblage of ornaments which, by means of painting, are employed to embellish edifices, too nearly appertain to the art of painting itself, to claim a more extended notice in this work. An architect should superintend each branch of decora- tion applied to his design ; directing and making choice of such subjects as are conformable to the locality they are intended to decorate, and to the character of his edifice ; so that the entire decoration of an edifice may present a harmonious conformity to the general design and taste of its architecture. ON THE PRINCIPLES AND BEAUTY OF ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITION OR DESIGN. All edifices and buildings are destined for some use ; and it is the apparent adaptation to this use, that constitutes their proper or relative character. This adaptation excites, and serv^es as a guide to the public mind, in estimating their value ; and enables men to judge of the precise degree of importance of each to society. Nature has given to all its produc- tions a peculiar physiognomy ; which makes them distinguishable from each other, and serves to indicate their several properties. The mind of man naturally follows this general law, in the formation of a multitude of its productions ; which though produced by neces- sity, yet make apparent the particular use for which they were destined. The effect of this law may be Pjlat?' ak'i:) :eijetat]lo:k'§ oifa jklousk. O D D D C PLAN OF A SMALL HOUSE IN THE BORGO DEL POPOLO.AT KOME . EiXVATIOM rROHTIirOTHE STREET. imJIenJtMjijS'/iirJkSu^^n.tjIrriUrnrtjr.i/ /7/-^Ti«r fy.Z>A^ Jttnnt*!' Three JVw .iBhnftyDiJVy tovt AttrTiamr-A-. EUETATIOS'S OlFaomSES, rlAZZA TlA.y.l'WETTA.AZ V;0M:E. . •nmfjtnJba^mmZ y. vraHr. TtnrBat ^. •.juMX'Jri-^ J' _ EJLEVATIOjJT ©F^HOTUSIE. HEAP. BOi- ."JLACE AT ROME. 3^ i°. Z^fn^vn/,Aii£ur^^ArAZitMtcn^'s./irrAtttxturaZJ)irtrt^ 2>y John, Stmnetr. JTirm Ik*n A j.^S . Liij i 1 — 1 — v*«/ Zm4ltm.hMMfuA fur SQUtujton's Art^ittrtiiral Ikrnrtw. hy SohivBemturTPan- tim Li^Mi.;- T-. T.tnrjtitmi ei.etatid:^ & SErTao>' op a hdi'se. [Ui: :l^iii': ['im-'ji'A': ::5^!>immJ1, ^ 1 ! . — i_L_ \' '^ ■ I: 1 n s Z-.''uhwv,2lJihA7u^fbr3^vt^timijAri-9xxr^XtdrdlJhrtvtiV'. 2>y .^>^ Jiraituxt . JTirt^ J)^t'J'tti(^ttH uy^-\ .liUL'§35, .^,iTinnririrfimrT^ n n n M ^ ^/°^l f;^u — ir^ -f^»^ -I -I-*' ■filliutytt>tij!jlrtfu«ainiral,3)ir«otcrltyJ(>hnS'9uuee, nnoJiinHuau/ti^ZiiintJIMmxttarJs^iw PiAJS- o:f &UISTIMIAI^I EAX.AC]E |ri u 1 Kji.-n-k! u-i| ".R THE P>^7THEON AT ROUE T6D3fgnr X^^tdm^Aiii y.jl far Mf/tnytrm .>• jl/r •JatrcturaZJlirator. i v John JiyiAnr, Thrf 2linTa.sjai/eJvyZatuCPatBrru.vttr£im I ! • ■ VI P]L.A^^ DP Arr AJRCAJDE,. Arcades. SiOom/tD serve ti^ JBaaodff-. <^ar^juraZafpurpaft>. Soz^xisas. ibr'&ta aiisy ixffttnwrdtx^umr'wz&vo it!r^0&^s. is^Yv iT .finaZtir it .Stazraz^tvttr>3iavs^mil'Aieltr^tyfJ?f : d/!_TV^i j-,drvifair**^*".iA/>i>wra?»^jiBJbt^-m /.-^: I! n KM m OS ESS M gn ESS IBBB IH ES! TB mi j ^' ->B^ © 5 ^ ijiir OP stp'St' ^H R'S ^JHLIIll^. m '■TiETTteraCS" FJLAK OF A CHiLJRCH. Lf>ai^a^ by John. Billmg SngrnTcd "hy E .BrookAd . Z^mdtm-. .Riiitirh^ ibr 3Clhn^-^'s Jtroktib»ceurdL I>tjr m3 t Kn\ "by Jchn. S^rm^ttr Ti%r*^ Jhn Ihjsa^^eutemoJtvrf Jtom I®H ©3" ^ (SJSIlffm€2 < ~r i»i*< r %,. W^—. — — — . — — — >- ». — -«. «r—- r-r_-««-«r-. -r— r«. fs|i3;!iJ5?l3S3'3M^^lP3^^ mM) mttMltf''^'-^-' '^^^' ■ ' ■ r^m' ^^^^^J^^^^J^ , \ /\ ^\ -- — I *" - - ^^"-^^-- --t\ :\ iX^XA i-jii^i^Li . . ^JfiL^L ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 281 discovered, even in the utensils and furniture, which have been formed to supply our wants, except where their form has been changed by caprice. There is necessarily then, a rule of taste dictated by nature, which prescribes to each kind of edifice, the character that it ought to present, in correspond- ence to the use for which it is intended. There is another law of nature, that architecture has followed ; which is, that beauty should be con- sistent with utility. Hence, if nature has joined a pleasure to the satisfying of every want, architecture has equally established a law, that the details of con- struction in serving their office, shall at the same time present a pleasing object to the spectator. Thus this art requires that all ornaments, by being applied on the principle of utility, shall indicate their purpose ; in order that its productions may satisfy our imagina- tion and judgment. Without entering into all the causes of character ; whether in nature, in painting or sculpture, or in the architecture of different countries ; it is intended to confine the present article to edifices constructed according to the principles of the antique architecture ; which is intended to be examined theoretically and practically. The best modern productions exhibit merit, only in proportion to their judicious imitation of the antique The most celebrated men have not failed to render a just acknowledgment to the great masters of antiquity, for the success which they have obtained, in following the spirit of their invaluable models. Far from envying them of their desert, let us rather acknow- ledjre the eminence at which these talented men 2o 282 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. have arrived, and imitate the immortal lessons they have left us. It is solely from the study of the antique, that the eminent architects of Italy, gained that judgment and taste, which presents itself in the productions erected in that country, during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. It is from this study, that Vignola, Serlio, Scamozzi, antl Palladio, owe the style and character which pervade the generality of their works. It is again, from it that Michel Angelo acquired his know- ledge of construction ; and attained that greatness of manner which his works exhibit, notwithstanding the many licences that disfigure them. In fine, it was from this study, that Alberti, Ligorio, Bruneleschi, Eramante, Sangallo, Peruzzi, and other celebrated artists and connoisseurs, gained their knowledge of architecture. But this study of antique remains, requires a greater degree of critical discernment than is generally admitted. What may be recommended on this sub- ject, can be reduced to two principal observations. The first relates to the choice of objects proposed for imitation. The second, to the spirit which ought to direct this imitation. These remains require, in their choice, a distinction of two kinds ; the one relates to the period from which they take their date , and the other, to the people by and amongst whom they were erected. Like empires, the arts and sciences have their revo- lutions; cultivated in one age and nation, neglected and forgotten in another ; their improvement was necessarily the result of the labours and exertions of many generations. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 283 We are, generally speaking, ignorant of the origin of an art or science, because the earliest essays are effaced by those more perfect attempts which imme- diately follow. In the arts and sciences nothing is produced suddenly, or without a preparatory step ; and all discoveries are made in such a gradual manner, that they appear almost imperceptible. Nevertheless, there are periods at which observations accumulate, and the necessity of improvement being more generally felt, induces those, gifted with a more perfect organi- zation and placed under more favourable circum- stances, to discover more powerful means of giving a new and better direction to preconceived ideas, and forms a remarkable feature in their advancement towards perfection. These distant intervals of time, are termed epochs ; and the preference given to any one, is determined by the merit of its productions. The epoch of Grecian art, designated by the term antique, is generally extended from the century of Alexander the Great, to the reign of the Emperor Phocias, or near the sixth century of the Christian era; but which, perhaps, may with more justice be supposed to have terminated with the fourth century. It is reasonable to suppose, that during so many centuries, the causes which contribute to the perfec- tion of the arts, could not have been equally favour- able. Hence, it is necessary to become acquainted, through the medium of their remains, with those ages that were the most propitious ; without which know- ledge, we should be equally liable indiscriminately to adopt the early essays of the art, and also to be misled by the abuses that cliaracterized its decline. 284 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. Ill order to be possessed of this necessary discern- ment, it is requisite to be acquainted with the princi- ples upon which the art is founded ; which are of three kinds. The tirst is founded upon the nature of things, or necessity ; and is required for the satisfac- tion of the most uncultivated minds, and consists in the solidity of its parts; such is the perpendicularity of columns, the parallelism of stories, and natural symmetry. The second is, the principles of beauty and suit- ableness. These are derived from experience and comparative excellence. The third is termed, principles of taste. They more immediately relate to that portion of the art, connected with ornament and decorative details. These principles will be found sufficiently treated on, under their respective articles. They are mentioned in this place, to shew that not only a knowledge of these principles is necessary, but likewise that they should be adhered to, in the study of imitation of the antique. Two powerful motives ought to influence this observance. The first is, the slowness with which the human mind attains a correct knowledge of what is really beautiful. The attempts made to arrive at this point, often produce no other effect than a further removal from it, when not in possession of a rule where- by to direct our researches ; and the principles just named are this rule. The second motive is, the abuse which may be made in the application of the most fortunate discoveries. Experience proves that man, from the time he has attained the highest and most ex- tended degree of intelligence, being unable to improve further the productions which are (he result of his ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 28d discoveries, commences innovations, and abandons those principles that constituted the perfection of his former works. From this cause proceed those arbi- trary rules, which mislead many individuals ; and who from a deficiency of proper information, make an indiscriminate choice, as shall be immediately sheuii. But independently of falling into these errors, which are almost inevitable, the student is compelled to follow a slow and monotonous imitation, the result of which is always uncertain. The truth of this observa- tion is much more important as regards architecture, because the imitation which this art makes of nature, is less direct than in painting and sculpture. Hence it is necessary to be possessed of fixed principles, which produce that degree of excellence, of which this art is capable. Nothing can be more valuable than such examples amongst the antique remains; in which genius has transmitted the immutable rules of beauty. Nothing is more reasonable, than the pre- ference which has been given to these productions ; founded on the suffrage of so many generations and so many countries. It doubtless required the concurrence of the most favourable circumstances, in order that the same form that was determined by necessity, should be likewise that which was the most capable of exhibiting pleasing proportions. If we consider antique architecture, as regards its beauty, we shall be inclined to conclude, that the sole object in its formation was to convey pleasure to the sight, and that it had never been subjected to the laws of necessity. If it be examined as respects utility, no other architecture presents in so clear a manner, the stamp of necessity ; which in the 286 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR Grecian, is satisfactorily proved never to have been sacrificed to appearance. Thus it must be admitted, that this fortunate union of necessity and ornament, is one of the most valuable discoveries of the Greeks ; and that this art is one of the most valuable results that man has deduced from nature. It is from these antique remains, that the archi- t ctural taste adopted by this and other nations, has drawn its resources, since the restoration of the arts. The experience of modern times has too often proved the necessity of this imitation. Every artist up to the present century, who has lost sight of this imitation, has invariably incurred the reproach of his successors. The spirit of caprice may for a season applaud novelties, but the judgment of posterity never fails to hold him up to just contempt, who has contributed to prevent the progress of a correct taste There are few abuses but may find countenance even in the antique, when it is imitated without dis- crimination. Hence the necessity of the strict em- ployment of the principles of the art ; without which exceptions would be changed into laws, and the abuses of rules would themselves become precedents for our observance. It is from the antique, that in- ventions the most opposite to its real spirit, are sup- posed to find justification. It must therefore appear eviaent, tnat the antique remains require in the student a cultivated mind, to distinguish those objects most worthy imitation, and which, when suitably employed in the composition of edifices, will gain the admiration of the present age, and serve as models to posterity. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 287 It has been stated, that the antique requires a distinction of two kinds ; that the first relates to the time at whicli these structures were erected, the necessity of which has just been shewn ; the second regards the artists by whom, and the country in which, they were erected, which remain to be proved. There exist fragments of a considerable number of edifices in Greece, which take their date from a period considerably anterior to that distinguished by the per- fection which the art afterwards attained : amonast others, are the ruins which maik the decline of the art in Italy, as also that of the Roman empire ; such as the thermae of Dioclesian at Rome ; also the remains at Spalatro in Dalmatia, and Palmyra and Baalbec in Coelosyria. These, nevertheless, present parts, from which a well-instructed mind might derive profit; but v.'ithout just discrimination, a risk is incurred, of falling into the grossest errors. The following enumera- tion will afford a proof of what is here advanced, by shewinof the liberties and abuses that have been intro- duced from an indiscriminate imitation. Thus the width of the intercolumniations at Spalatro, has given rise to the distancing of columns in the most faulty manner. Friezes prepared to the hand of the sculptor, but left without receiving his embellishing aid, gave rise to the introduction of a curved frieze, as an archi- tectural form. At the decline of the arts and of Rome, from the scarcity of marble and the insufficiency of materials necessary for the construction of architraves, arches were raised from column to column. This custom has been continued, notwithstanding the con- trary examples exhibited in the productions of the previous centuries. A few coupled columns amongst 288 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. the remains of Palmyra, have been sufficient authority for this abuse in their employment. Two mutilated pediments at Baalbec have been imitated, though they are in contradiction to the system of carpentry, and the laws that tradition have transmitted to us, in the edifices of Greece and Italy. In conclusion, it may be observed, that it is to the edifices erected in Greece during- the advanced state of this art, and to those at Rome in the reigns of Au- gustus, Trajan, and Adrian, the greater portion of which were conducted and executed by Grecian artists, that the attention should be directed in the choice of models for imitation. It has already been remarked, that the antique requires observations of two kinds. The first relates to the choice of the remains proposed for imitation, the remarks upon which have just been concluded ; and the second to the spirit that ought to direct this imi- tation, which shall be forthwith treated upon. The antique may be imitated in two ways; one in imitating its style, and the other in embracing the principles and genius which it exhibits. It has been elsewhere asserted, that the imitation of these remains is indispensable to the artist ; as we do not enjoy a union of the same causes which promoted the perfection of this art amongst the ancients. These remains have become the focus in which are concen- trated the scattered and fugitive beauties of nature. The gift of making a free imitation, is possessed by only a few individuals : and it is almost inseparable from invention. Indeed, those only who have given the most incontestable proofs of the latter, possess the former qualification. Thus a servile imitation, far ARCHITECTUKAL DIKECTOR. 289 from leading to excellence, soon diverts us even from the path which conducts to it. A blind routine takes possession of the mind, and destroys the germ of invention. It is difficult to conceive a more servile imitation, or a more injudicious application of the antique, than in the frequent and almost exclusive employment of the early Grecian doric, in most modern edifices. Such of our structures, the real character of which consists in an expression of lightness and elegance, almost invariably exhibit a servile imitation of the heaviest style of Grecian art, which would induce an observer to conclude, that their authors were totally ignorant of an appropriate style. The imitation of the antique should not be servile, but free ; that is, we should use its essence and appropriate its means ; and not repeat without motive its details and forms. For how can it be supposed possible, by the last-mentioned means, to raise the art to that excellence, which it attained in countries, whose successful cultivation of it has rendered them immortal, when the extreme difference is considered, which exists between our manners, customs, and laws, and those of the ancients. In order to be enabled to attain the same eminence, there must be a corres- ponding conception ; but the servile imitator, heavily and blindly pursues his course, without having any praiseworthy object in view. From the resources of this art and the inexhaustible variety of their application, why, in imitating the an- tique, should we restrict the whole merit of invention, so congenial to the feelings of an artist, and so neces- sary in stimulating his exertions, to the servile talent 2p i^90 AllCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. of copying, without modification, a limited number of forms and combinations ? It is granted, that the pro- portions exhibited in the best remains of the antique, are eminently calculated to captivate the mind ; and further, that credit is due also to those who imitate them, in preference to those of any other system of architecture. But it is essential to remember, that amongst the ancients, these proportions constituted only a means ; and that the real end of the art was to adapt their employment to the manners of the period, and to local circumstances. They thus produced an art, previously considered purely geometrical, whose means of communication were as rich and expressive as those of painting and sculpture. It was from a profound study of the different effects, characters, and expressions, that resulted from the application of these forms and proportions, that the ancients succeeded in laising architecture to a sublime art. In this it is highly commendable to imitate them ; and from their example, to study the alterations that the progress of time, manners, and information, have produced amongst the moderns; drawing from the immediate and in- variable resources of the art which have been trans- mitted to us by the ancients, those secret analogies that nature may have established between these resources and our wants. Whatever difference there may exist between our customs and theirs, they were, nevertheless, of the same human nature, and sus- ceptible of the same sentiments and efforts. The art of characterizing, that is to say, of rendering evident, by material forms, the intellectual qualities and moral ideas required to express in edifices, or to make known, by the harmony and suitableness of al". ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 291 the constituent parts tliat enter into their composition, the use for which they are intended, is perhaps, of all the secrets of architecture, the most difficult to developeorto attain. This happy talent of conceiving and of communicating the conception, in the physiog- nomy suitable to each edifice ; this sure and delicate discernment, which exhibits the distinguishing parts of such edifices, that at first appear susceptible of no characteristic distinctions ; this judicious employment of the different styles, which are as the tones of archi- tecture ; this skilful application of the signs, which the art employs to affect the sight and understanding ; this exquisite feeling, which errs neither in the just disposition of the masses and employment of the details, nor in the just dispensation of richness and simplicity ; and which is able to combine true expres- sion of character with the harmonious accord of all the qualities susceptible of being represented by archi- tecture ; all this requisite talent, which study perfects, but does not produce, is a gift possessed by few. Tliis suitable expression presents itself under two relations; the one appertaining to architecture in general, and the other to edifices in particular. The first consists in the expression of the qualities or intellectual ideas, which are the result of the art metaphysically con- sidered. The second, in the true indication of the uses for which edifices are designed; that i.s, in con- sidering architecture as a certain mode of expressing or painting. This expression, according to the nature of the buildings and edifices, maybe produced by the gradation of richness and greatness proportionate to their nature, and the object for which they were ericted ; bv the indication of (he ?>»()rnl o'laHties 292 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. attached to each edifice, the manner of expressing which, is beyond the reach of rules ; by the general and particular forms of architecture ; by the species of the construction and the quality of the materials that may be employed in their execution ; and lastly, by the resources of decoration. The first and most important rule in expressing the proper character of buildings and edifices is, doubtless, to know their nature and analogous qualities. If the character and use of any edifice be examined, they will be found to present a necessary relation to, and a decided analogy with, some of the qualities that archi- tecture is enabled to express. From the simple hut of the husbandman, to the sumptuous palace of the sovereign ; from the habitation of the citizen to the temples of the Divinity ; from the least public estab- lishment to the great monuments which form the embellishment of cities ; there exists an extensive variety of grades, to each of which the art affords an appropriate character. The want of this proper character in the different classes of edifices of which cities are composed, cannot always be attributed to the artists. Public manners have a very decided influence in causing this striking disproportion in, and confusion of, the scale of propriety in the appearance of edifices. When the acquirement of power and the possession of riches afford men the means of obtaining luxuries, the simplicity of the style adopted in the habitations of their fellow-citizens is rejected ; they w^ill no longer inhabit constructions which designate them as being mortals, but they raise for their dwellings, temples and other similar edifices. At Athens, the houses were simple, and the public ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 293 edifices sumptuous. Rome also retained, for a long period, this same moderation in the residences of individuals. Architecture suffers great injury from these customs and mistaken ideas of luxury ; which tend to destroy the arts, although they may be profitable to the artists. This art is injured by the influence of corrupt manners ; by the apparent decrease of richness and greatness in public edifices, which is caused by the increase of these qualities in the residences of individuals. For how can it be expected that the characteristics of an edifice will be observed amongst a nation which does not observe even the most ordinary gradations in the order of the distinctions belonging to the different classes of buildings ? Again : greatness, elevation, extent, richness and luxury of decoration, are the means by which edifices are characterized. If an injudicious melange of these means be applied to all kinds of constructions; if the residence of an individual presents in its peristyle the appearance of a church ; if the magnificence of the richest of the orders be applied to buildings, the nature of which is in contra- diction with their employment, is it not evident that the most material of the distinctive signs of edifices will disappear ? What means could be employed to express that this edifice is a church ; or that that is destined to some important public use ; if the signs which are absolutely necessary for the expression of these qualities, be indiscriminately employed in all kinds of buildings ? There is no doubt, that the manners of a people influence the character of their architecture. Where there exK«ts a great inequality of niu^ and fortune 294 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. amongst a people, it is strongly marked in their architecture. Where public edifices are neglected, this art only exhibits the luxury of individuals. If we consider the antique cities, where the arts took up their abode, how modest and unassuming- appeared the residences ! But how immense were their public edifices; how their temples, tribunals, &c., majestically distinguished themselves from the adjacent habitations ! It was in them that the public pride and enjoyment was placed, being considered as the property of each citizen ; and the fame and pleasure attached to their magnificence, was not in- dividual, but national. The Greeks have left us the following proof of their ideas on this subject : " He who erects a residence that shall exceed in splendour and majesty the tem- ples of the deities, or the edifices destined to public service, far from being worthy of esteem, merits but reproach. No private construction ought to insult, by an appearance of importance and magnificence, the public edifices." — Laivs of Charondas. The public edifices form a history of the taste of each generation. Every generation, like every indi- vidual, desires to leave marks which may serve to shew^ the epoch of their existence upon the earth ; and also that they weie rich, powerful, and favoured by nature in the possession of talent. The love of immortality, vvhich is next to that of life, exists amonsrst all classes of men. In fine, the public edifices represent the nation itself; inasmuch as they attest the degree of taste, wealth, and refinement, at which it had arrived. It must not be imagined that to give the proper ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOK. 295 character to public edifices, incurs a greater expense. Talent may supply expense. Wiien funds are in- sufficient for the ordinary means, still it is possible to display a certain magnificence ; for there is a mag- nificence which is unattended with expense, it is that of taste. By these means, the energy of the character proper to each edifice, would acquire more value. Independently of their particular elevation and real dimension, they would gain upon the public opinion, by the striking contrast they would oifer to the sur- rounding buildings ; exhibiting at once to the eyes of the spectators, the real character and importance of each. If the peristyle with a pediment was exclusively dedicated to churches, what a majestic influence, and, as may be said, sanctity^ would it not acquire, by the certain and determined idea that it would awaken in the mind of the spectator. If the employment of columns, judiciously arranged, were reserved for the decoration of public edifices; how imposing and significant would they not be- come ! The resources of sculpture would be ef- fective according to the greatness of the design to which they might be applied. This gradation in the different edifices of towns and cities, is the first means of indicating their relative character. Thus an architect is not at liberty arbi- trarily to dispose, and indistinctly use, all the resources of his art, in the edifices which he erects. So that in the composition of any design, he should bear in mind, that each edifice must possess relative qualities, which architecture is enabled to express and manifest to the sight. F.vtcU of ihvsc qualities will accordingly serve 296 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. him as a type in his invention. By displaying an ignorance of them, he will draw upon himself the just criticisms of those who are versed in the art. The residences of individuals may be varied by presenting appearances of simplicity, together w ith a certain elegance free from luxury ; though still con- forming to the general type which habitations ought to present. The palaces and mansions of sovereigns and nobles, are governed by the rank and quality of those who it is intended should occupy them. Palaces, and large mansions in general, ought not to exhibit other forms or style than are applied to private houses ; the difference should only exist in their scale and proportions. The palaces of Florence and some other cities in Italy may be adduced as examples ; they all present houses that are more lofty and spacious than ordinary, yet always exhibiting the same style as the other habitations. All the riches of architecture ought to be reserved for the public edifices. In them, like- wise, an artist should exhibit all his talent and pene- tration, in proportioning and modifying his resources, according to the nature of the edifices ; indicating in them their analogy with the moral qualities which they ought to represent. It is very important that the language of architec- ture have its value, so that its signs be understood and produce those effects of which they are capable. Therefore it follows, that to express a particular quality by means of certain objects, it is necessary that the same means be not indiscriminately employed for the expression of any other quality. An architect ought then, in order to characterize his productions, to apply all his diligence and study to the perfect ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 297 attainment of the expression of the respective quali- ties in edifices. The analogy of some edifices with the qualities which they ought to present, are of so decided a nature, as not to be easily mistaken. Thus it is evident that a prison ought to inspire terror, and an assembly and concert room, pleasure. If the impression of the ideas which should be conveyed by such edifices, fail in their effect ; it is not from the individual's ignorance of the evident quaHties that tliese ought to express, neither that they do not offer sufficient scope for the exercise of his talents, nor that he is wanting in suitable re- sources from the art ; but is caused by the absence of that requisite qualification, ability. To form an exact and distinct idea of the special and proper qualities of the different numerous edifices, in which the similarity of their uses seems to strengthen their affinity, re- quires considerable talent to accomplish. Often false ideas, even in the judgment that ought to conduct the student in the choice of character, cause liim to err ; from a conviction that all the richness of his art ought to be applied to edifices which, in reality, require but a very inferior and subordinate portion. The evident gradation of richness or simplicity in aichitecture, is one of the most striking means that can be employed to characterize objects; but this and other means are applied, or at least ought to be applied, to the metaphorical or ideal expression of edifices. It is this progression of opinion relative to the employ- ment of edifices, as respects their uses, and the ideas attached to them, by which a student should be guided in the distribution of the resources of the art. Churches present themselves as the first objects of 2 Q 298 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. consideration. In them tne artist ought to express all the sentiments of greatness, power, and majesty, attached to the Being to whose honour they are erected. Now, richness in architecture is one of the sisrns representative of power. Richness, and the greatest richness, is then appHcable to churches. By richness is not understood a confused mass of decoration, com- posed of marbles and metals ; the vain display of which, only serves to convey an idea of luxury and superfluity ; and for this reason it tends to impoverish the sentiment which is wished to be expressed. Richness consists in the multiplied employment of the columns of those orders that present the greatest number of ornaments, and the greatest magnificence. The Greeks assimi- lated the several orders to the different characters of their divinities. They possessed the art of exhibiting this expression of the different qualities susceptible of being represented by architecture. Strength, great- ness, and majesty struck the astonished spectator in the temples of Jupiter. Nobleness and gravity, in those of Hercules, Mars, and of Minerva. Pleasure, gaiety, and grace, presented their fascinating smiles at the temples of Venus, Flora, and the Naiades By a judicious employment of the different styles, they succeeded in exhibiting a precise expression in their productions, even when the divinities to which they were dedicated, offered a mixed character ; and therefore requiring very minute and particular shades to make the indication apparent. Such were the temples of Juno, Diana, Bacchus, and others of the same class. No people ever carried to such perfection the poetical language of architecture. But what other ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 299 people ever existed under circumstances so favourable to this development? As each divinity was itself but the emblem of some moral quality; the religious, in consecrating temples to them, imposed on architec- ture the task of expressing and making evident each of their qualities, which were to form a particular feature in the composition of each edifice. Thus an architect charged with the erection of a temple to a divinity, employed by study the whole powers of his mind in order to gain a just and accurate conception of the real character of this divinity ; that is, the qualities that had been given by the imagination to these allegorical beings; and thus to employ such means as would enable him to fix, through the medium of architectural forms, these fugitive results of the mind. Although we have not in tliis respect all the re- sources that result from polytheism, we may, notwith- standing, vary the aspect and ordonnance of churches, by applying to each, as motive for their styles, some one of the attributes of the divinity corresponding to the qualities which are within the bounds of the art. If, then, columns produce the greatest degree of richness in architecture, the artist that is economical and discreet in the employment of his means, will readily conceive that all edifices, of whatever nature they may be, do not require the same degree of this species of richness, as sacred edifices ; and lastly, that all objects which convey any idea of, or approach to, the form of a church, when applied to other purposes, presents a contradiction. It doubtless requires considerable study to attain a knowledge of the propriety ^vhic]l should be observed 300 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. in each edifice ; to determine the style applicable to its uses ; and to establish the physiognomy which it ought to have, on the nature of the qualities attached to it. Thus an exchange, where merchants, bankers, brokers, &c., meet to ncgociate their affairs, ought to express the qualities of those branches related to it. Opulence without luxury, convenience and commo- diousness without elegance, and gravity without majesty, should be the characteristics of such an editice : presenting a spacious interior, surrounded by a piazza. It would be erroneous to establish the expression of the proper qualities of an edifice, either upon undeter- mined ideas, or puerile relations between the appear- ance of the edifice and its uses : as for example ; to suppose that the place appropriated to the coinage of money, that in which it is circulated, or that which serves as a depot, should announce by an exterior richness of architecture, the material and metallic riches which may be contained in it. Thus, then, to determine the proper expression of character in edifices, their nature and propriety should always be consulted. By their nature is understood the rank which they hold in the public opinion ; by propriety, the degree of suitableness that their employment requires. If dedicated to the cultivation of the Sciences, the study of the Belles Lettres, and of the Arts ; a noble appearance, without too much gravity, agreeable without voluptuousness, and simple without austerity, at once make known its destination ; galleries, form- ing colonnades, surrounding the principal parts of the edifice, enlivening its avenues, and embellishing its interior areas. Amongst the number of those erected ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 301 for similar uses in cities, there are many grades to be observed. If it be a place for education, it requires a greater degree of modesty, temperance, and economy. If an hospital destined as a receptacle for the indi- gent, or the curing of their diseases ; the great extent of the plan, exterior simplicity, convenience in all the ac- cessory parts, numerous apertures for the circulation of air, a large and solid style of construction, presenting great and uninterrupted surfaces, constitute the cha- racteristic contrast between this and other edifices. If a store-house, custom-house, or warehouse ; all that enters into their composition requires a character more of massiveness than strength, and a style pre- senting more rusticity than severity. The employment of columns is altogether in contradiction with their character ; no degree of ornament whatever ought to present itself in these productions. Their mag- nificence consists in massive proportions, elevated arches and strengthenings forming chains, or bonds of projecting stones. If a theatre, museum, or concert-room, all the graces of architecture may be called into action. Pleasure, gaiety, and delicateness, may in turn decorate its walls ; but ought rather to be produced by taste than luxury. The amenity and lightness of the muses, and the sentiment of harmony, of which these edifices are the abode, are sufficient to inspire the real artist with a knowledge of the style suitable to them. The type for tribunals, ought to present an expression of irravitv, decorum, nnd austeritv. Their noble and .serionsly imposing ordonnance, should produce a sen- timent of respect and awe. If a town-hall ; it ought to represent the wealth 302 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR, and extent of the town or city, and the commerce and opulence of its inhabitants ; serving as their rendez- vous, and the principal place for the settling of their affairs. This kind of edifice ought to partake of the forms applied to palaces, but surpassing them in greatness, elevation, richness, and decoration. There are many other edifices, the particular phy- siognomy of which might be given, were it not for increasing the length of this article which is already of considerable extent. These details may be easily supplied by a careful examination of the nature of edifices, and of the most proper means to render it apparent. By following this rule, neither the resources of architecture will be found too limited, nor its signs too few in number ; but will afford all the variety of expression which the different compositions require. Architects, doubtless, stand in need of being sup- ported in their attempts to express the delicate senti- ment of propriety of character in their designs, by the enlightened taste of the public ; by the intimate in- telligence between their manner of expressing, and that of comprehending, on the part of those to whom the signs are addressed. Notwithstanding which, architects have greatly contributed to corrupt and mislead the understanding of the public, by the abusive application of the means necessary to characterize edifices ; and above all by the confused employment of the general and particular forms of architecture. To characterize edifices, it does not suffice to have observed the necessary gradation of richness which propriety demands ; nor to conceive the qualities ana- logous to the nature and suitableness of each. But when a student has determined in his mind the just ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 303 proportion of these grades ; when his imagination has attained an exact idea of the scale and style proper for each edifice ; it is then requisite that he be ac- quainted with the active and material means, whereby he may be enabled to fix his thought and give it consistence. There exists between the nature of the greater part of edifices and many of the general and particular forms of architecture, a relation of conformity, with which it is extremely important to be acquainted ; so as to prevent their employment in a contradictory sense ; and also to derive an advantage by their judicious application. It does not suflSce that this distinctive character should alone be indicated by the resources of decoration ; though this aid, when judi- ciously employed, may, it is true, add to its perfection. But it is likewise required that the disposition of the total of a composition be judicious; that the forms employed be appropriate ; and the whole harmonious ; in order to produce the suitable expression of character necessary for each particular class of edifices. It is upon the composition of the plan that depends the merit that ought to be apparent in an edifice; and firstly, that desirable quality, conveniency. It should be disposed so as to satisfy the wants and degrees of suitableness that the uses for which it may be intended require. In this respect, a talented artist is one that succeeds in uniting conveniency for the service of the interior, and the necessary depeudances; so as to present a regularity is always desirable. Nevertheless, there is a pleasure produced by symmetry, in tlie uniform correspondence of all the parts of a plan ; to effect which, it would be injudicious to sacrifice the 304 ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. conveniency and propriety of its distribution. This exact observance of a symmetrical distribution, which is so agreeable to the sight, is seldom so connected as to present itself in the elevation. Inasmuch as this exactness ought to be observed, when unopposed by any reasonable motive ; so likewise it should be re- nounced when it is found to interfere with that first obHgation in all compositions, its relation to the wants and employment of the edifice. In the composition of a plan, there exists a merit of another kind ; which more particularly depends on taste. It is the general motive adopted, which deter- mines the form of the edifice, its character, and what may be termed its particular physiognomy. This merit depends chiefly on the form that the artist may employ for his plan. An edifice of a cir- cular form will convey a totally different idea to one that is quadrangular. It may be remarked further to depend on what may be principally required that the plan should present ; on the number of columns em- ployed, and the solidity of the masses, to characterize an edifice ; by making known that such dispositions are in relation with such and such uses. In the plan of an edifice that is well conceived, as it determines the elevation, there must result from the vertical masses which arise from it, an agreeable aspect ; by the mutual relation alone which the mind may perceive in it. It may be generally observed, that upon the sim- plicity of a plan depends that of the elevation ; and that this quality is the principle of greatness. A capricious and irregular plan, produces a multiplicity of projections, vicious forms, and interrupted lines ; ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. HO-) and destroys, from the number of details it introduces, the effect of the architecture. In fact, the great effect in the antique temples, proceeds from the simplicity of their plans. Indeed, there is no edifice, the use of which does not determine the general and particular forms that should concur in its formation. Churches, for example, are considered the terrestrial abodes of the Divinity ; but they ought not to resemble in any respect human habitations. Their plan should be simple, and uniform. The ancients never employed other forms for this purpose, than those which were either round or square. Thus, as regards our customs, the parallelogram appears the best adapted. Nothing is more in contradiction with the interior arrangement of churches, than the form of a cross : whatever may have been the religious opinion, on which its appli- cation has been so injudiciously established. This form interrupts their unity ; introduces a union of, as it were, two edifices ; and is in opposition to that necessary law of suitableness, which requires that the minister may be seen from all parts of their interior. It follows, that from these precepts of propriety, and the idea attached to the Being to whose service they are erected, that the less their details resemble those applied to our habitations, the more they will contri- bute to the expression of their true character. Also, the less the apertures for the admission of light, &c., be multiplied the greater will be their contrast with ordinary buildings. Or, if the manner of service re- quire a considerable degree of light in the interior, the windows should differ as much as possible in form, distribution, and appearance, from those of houses ; which serve at the same time for the intro- 2 R 300 ARCHITECTUKAL DIRECTOR. duction of light, and to open to the inhabitants the agreeableness of the prospect which their situation may afford. All the other objects which enter into their composition, and which hkewise form a part in the ordinary wants of Hfe, should be dignilied as much as possible in their application to these edi- fices. The ancients were strict observers of these principles of propriety ; inasmuch as the general, as also some particular forms, were exclusively reserved for the temples of their deities. The essential differ- ence that exists between the religious service of the ancients and that of Christianity, necessarily gave rise to the adoption of those peculiar distributions, remark- able in the temples of the former, and the churches of the latter. Thus the principal service of the ancients was performed in the enclosed area at the front of their temples; the temple itself forming but a species of sanctuary. Whilst the religious service of the Christians, required spacious interiors, capable of con- taining those who assembled to assist at the devotions; likewise that the officiating minister might be visible to all present ; and also that each individual might possess the advantage of distinctly hearing those public discourses, which formed a part of the service. Amongst all the edifices employed at that time for different uses, none seemed to present a total so capable of satisfying all the exigences of the then newly established religion, as the basilica. Hence, the principal reason for the adoption of the form of the basilicas in the erection of the churches of the early Christians, in preference to that of the tem- ples, was, independently of their aversion to the wor- ship of the ancients, their want of interior capacity. ARCHITECTURAL DIRECTOR. 307 Some writers have remarked, that the early Christian emperors caused the antique basiUcas to be employed for the celebration of the new worship, which is evi- dently incorrect ; for if this had been the case, some of these edifices must necessarily, from being- applied to this service, have been preserved ; however, far from there being any existing remains, it is even difficult to discover the sites which they occupied. The most ancient Christian basilicas, or those which date their erections from the first centuries of the public exercise of this religion, were constructed expressly for the uses to which they were applied. This statement is indubitably confirmed in the details of their architec- ture, which remain as undeniable proofs of the period at which they were executed. In the erection of these new edifices, the disposition of the antique basi- licas was followed ; and whether they retained their denomination, from the impossibility of changing a name, which custom had established for centuries, this appellation was given to those afterwards raised. The finest churches at Rome still retain this name, and take their date from the reign of Constantine. This disposition was afterwards imitated in the con- struction of Gothic churches ; presenting a principal nave elevated above the side aisles, tooether with o'al- leries, apsis, &c. The basilical form gradually disap- peared in those churches erected after the revival of the arts ; the principal reason for which proceeded from the desire that the moderns manifested, to unite the dimension of the western basilicas with the con- struction of the churches of the east; of which St. Sophia at Constantinople presents one of the earliest examples. The